The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 04/28/2015 Item # 9A 4/28/2015 9.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to deny the single, 2013 Cycle 3 Growth Management Plan Amendment specific to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict petition. (Adoption Hearing) (Companion to rezone petition PUDZ-PL20130001726,Vincentian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development). OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to deny (not adopt) the single petition in the 2013 Cycle 3 of amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) and not to approve said amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. CONSIDERATIONS: • Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government's adopted Growth Management Plan. • County Resolution 12-234 provides for a public petition process to amend the Collier County GMP. • For this Adoption hearing, the sole petition in the 2013 Cycle 3 of GMP amendments being considered is PL20130001767/CP-2013-10,Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. • The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the "local planning agency" under Chapter 163.3174, F.S., held its Transmittal hearings for the subject petition on August 21 and September 4, 2014. The BCC held its Transmittal hearing on October 14 and 28, 2014. Their respective transmittal recommendations/actions are contained in the CCPC adoption hearing Staff Report. • The CCPC held its adoption hearing on March 19, 2015. The staff and CCPC adoption hearing recommendations are presented further below. • After review of the Transmitted GMP amendment, the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) rendered its Comment Letter indicating "no comment" within the agency's authorized scope of review, as did the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC), Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (DACS), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), and South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD). The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) conducted a planning level analysis and rendered comments within their authorized scope of review. FDOT indicates that the proposed amendment is not anticipated to adversely impact important State transportation resources or facilities, and provided an additional comment regarding FDOT access standards; and, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) rendered comments within their authorized scope of review, indicating that the proposed amendment is not anticipated to adversely impact important State resources. The Florida Department of Education (DOE) rendered comments within their authorized scope of review, as follows: The Department recommends the changes associated with the proposed amendment CP- 2013-10 be reviewed as required by Section 8 of the Collier County Interlocal Agreement Packet Page-23- 4/28/2015 9.A. for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency before adoption consideration. In response to the DOE Comment, staff notes the Transmittal package of materials was provided to School District representatives and subsequently reviewed in accordance with Interlocal Agreement Section 8. Determinations from their Section 8 review are found in a letter dated January 22, 2015, as attached hereto and summarized below. In accordance with Interlocal Agreement subsection 8.2, Collier County notified the School District of the proposed GMP amendment that may increase school enrollment. In accordance with Interlocal Agreement subsection 14.2, the Collier County School District subsequently conducted the school planning level review per the Collier County Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency and responded. The School District response indicates at this time there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development for the elementary, middle and high school levels. This finding is for planning and informational purposes only and does not constitute either (sic) a determination of concurrency for the proposed project. At the time of site plan or plat the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity either within the concurrency service area the development is located within or adjacent concurrency service areas such that the level of service standards are not exceeded. The remaining review agency (Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources) did not provide a Comments Letter. All review agency Comments Letters received are contained in the back-up materials. • This adoption hearing considers amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) text and Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series. Note: Because the support materials are voluminous, and some exhibits may be oversized, the Agenda Central system does not contain all of the related documents pertaining to this GMP amendment petition. The entire Executive Summary package, including all support materials, is included in the binder that is available for review in the Comprehensive Planning Section office at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, as well as in the Clerk of Courts/Minutes and Records office at 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 401,Naples. Petition PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 is a petition submitted by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, for Global Properties of Naples, LLC requesting amendment to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE)to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. The Vincentian Subdistrict site comprises 30.7 acres and is located south and east of Southwest Boulevard, south and west of US 41 (Tamiami Trail East), and west of the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. With this re-designation, the property would allow for entirely commercial development, for entirely residential development, or for mixed use (commercial and residential) development. Commercial development is limited to 250,000 square feet of gross floor area, one hotel of up to 150 rooms and an assisted living facility. Commercial uses allowed are the permitted and conditional uses of the C-3 zoning district, plus hotel, dental labs, skilled nursing facilities, and department stores from the C-4 Commercial General Zoning District, in the Collier County Land Development Code. Residential development is limited to a maximum of 224 market rate multi- Packet Page-24- 4/28/2015 9.A. family units. Mixed use development limits commercial intensity to 128,000 square feet of gross floor area, one hotel of up to 150 rooms and an assisted living facility ❑ all on no more than 10 acres, and residential density based on 7.3 units per non-commercial acre. The Subdistrict also provides for conversions if the project is developed with a hotel or assisted living facility, automobile fuel pumps accessory to a grocery store or membership warehouse-type facility larger than 15,000 square feet of gross floor area, and a recreational site no greater than 3 acres for use by residents of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks. Note:A companion PUD rezone petition is scheduled for this same hearing. Staff analysis of this petition is included in the Transmittal CCPC Staff Report. There was one public speaker at the CCPC adoption public hearing, who spoke in support of the request. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This GMP amendment is authorized by, and subject to the procedures established in, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The Community Planning Act, and by Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: (1) consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, including analysis of impact on public infrastructure; (2) consistency with the Land Development Code, including compatibility analysis; and (3) review of data and analysis to support the proposed amendment. This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires an affirmative vote of four for approval because this is an Adoption hearing of the GMP amendment. [SAS] FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the County resulting from this amendment if it is adopted. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This is an adoption public hearing for the single petition in the 2013 Cycle 3 of amendments to the GMP. Based upon statutory changes that occurred during the 2011 Florida Legislative session, this GMP amendment is presumed to be "in compliance" with applicable Florida Statutes. After adoption, the DEO and other applicable review agencies will have 30 days (from the date DEO determines the adoption packages are complete) to review the adopted Plan amendment and, should they believe the amendment is not "in compliance," file a challenge [appeal] to the presumed "in compliance" determination with the Florida Division of Administrative hearings. Similarly, any affected party also has 30 days (from the date of BCC adoption) in which to file a challenge. If a timely challenge is not filed by DEO or an affected party,then the amendment will become effective. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: The majority of the subject site is forested with native vegetation. Also on-site are approximately 12.66 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. Wetlands on- site are isolated with no hydrological connection to wetlands or waters off-site. No documented occurrences of listed wildlife species or signs of listed wildlife species were observed on the property. The proposed GMP amendment allows for the off-site retention of a portion of the native vegetation required to be retained on the subject property, thus requiring only 15 percent of the native vegetation to be retained on site verse 25 percent, should the property be developed as residential or mixed use. To insure the portion of the preserve can be satisfied off-site, an exemption to the LDC provision allowing off site retention of native vegetation has been included in the GMP amendment. Packet Page-25- 4/28/2015 9.A. HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: According to the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, no significant archaeological or historical sites are recorded for or likely to be present within, the subject area, and that it is unlikely that any such sites will be affected. The property is subject to the requirement for accidental discovery of archaeological or historical sites as required by the CCME and LDC. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the CCPC forward petition PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 to the BCC with a recommendation not to adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and reviewing agencies that provided comments. IF the Planning Commission chose to recommend adoption, staff recommended revisions to portions of the Subdistrict text to remove an unnecessary intensity standard for the hotel use no longer contained in the LDC. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The Collier County Planning Commission, also acting in their capacity as the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC), held its required Adoption public hearing on March 19, 2015. At that hearing, the petitioner proposed several changes for clarification, to which staff recommended minor edits. The CCPC recommended that the BCC adopt petition CP-2013-10, including the petitioner-proposed changes and staff-recommended revisions (vote: 5/0). The CCPC- recommended text is reflected in Exhibit A to the Adoption Ordinance,and is shown below. Words underlined are added-as approved for transmittal by BCC; Words double underlined are added,words a are deleted—both as recommended for adoption by CCPC. 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres. is located on the south/west side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for neighborhood, community, and regional commercial development; residential development; and mixed use (commercial and residential) development. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and to provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In order to comply with Policy 1.10 of the Housing Element of the Growth Management Plan, residential development shall be limited to market-rate units so as to avoid the concentration of affordable housing in one location in the County. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The development of this Subdistrict shall comply with the following restrictions, limitations and standards: a. Allowable uses: The maximum intensity of commercial uses shall be limited to those allowed in the C-3 zoning district, both by right and by conditional use, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict. Additionally., the following uses are allowed: 1. Department store (5311), 2. Hotel (7011. hotel only). 3. Dental laboratories (8072),and Packet Page-26- 4/28/2015 9.A. 4. Nursing and personal care facilities (8051). b. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), owl one hotel (maximum F AJ ^ ` -d V.,.,...:-_,.•-.-., of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre. or portion thereof, of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet, or portion thereof for fractional amount under an acre_ 2. Residential development shall be limited to a maximum density of 7.3 units per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the property exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 224 multi-family dwelling units. 3. If the project is developed as mixed use (residential and commercial uses), the residential density allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses, owl a 150-room hotel `o o..cood n, and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. Additionally, for every acre, or portion thereof, of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet, or portion thereof for fractional amount under an acre. 4. A stand-alone automobile service station (i.e. retail fuel sales in conjunction with a convenience store) is prohibited; however, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery store fSIC 541 1)or membership warehouse type facility (SIC 5311, 5331j greater than 15,000 square feet of GFA are allowed. 5. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts. c. Site Development: 1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The rezone ordinance shall contain development and design standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses, and shall include additional restrictions and standards necessary to ensure that uses and hours of operation are compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be submitted with the first Site Development Plan. 3. The unified planned development submitted at time of the first Site Development Plan will reflect. -:----- - : ---- -- • -:-, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. 4. Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties, where feasible, and between internal buildings. 5. At the time of Site Development Plan approval, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1(13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. At a minimum, 15 percent of the on-site native vegetation must be retained on-site. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, Packet Page-27- 4/28/2015 9.A. a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: Same as to the CCPC — Not to adopt and transmit petition PL20130001767/CP-2013-10, as submitted or as revised at the CCPC meeting, to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, as it is staff's opinion that the petitioner has not demonstrated, through data and analysis: 1) there is a need for additional commercial in this area; and, 2) it is appropriate to increase density at this location which is within the Coastal High Hazard Area. (Note: These concerns were discussed and vetted at the transmittal hearing.) Prepared by: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, and David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division, Growth Management Department Attachments: 1) CCPC Adoption Staff Report; 2) Adoption Ordinance with Exhibit "A" text and maps; 3) DEO and Reviewing Agency Comment Letters; 4) Transmittal Executive Summary; 5) CCPC Transmittal Staff Report; 6)Approved Transmittal Resolution; 7) CP-2013-10 Application Backup Information (petition only) ❑ due to the size of the entire document, the complete back- up is accessible at: http://www.colliergov.net/ftp/AeendaApri12815/GrowthMgmt/PL20130001767_CP-2013- 10_Application Petition.pdf. Packet Page-28- 4/28/2015 9.A. COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.9.A. Item Summary: Recommendation to deny the single, 2013 Cycle 3 Growth Management Plan Amendment specific to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict petition. (Adoption Hearing) (Companion to rezone petition PUDZ-PL20130001726,Vincentian Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development) Meeting Date: 4/28/2015 Prepared By Name: SchmidtCorby Title: Planner,Principal, Comprehensive Planning 3/30/2015 12:55:43 PM Submitted by Title: Planner, Principal, Comprehensive Planning Name: SchmidtCorby 3/30/2015 12:55:44 PM Approved By Name: WeeksDavid Title: Manager-Planning,Comprehensive Planning Date: 4/7/2015 1:34:53 PM Name: BosiMichael Title:Division Director-Planning and Zoning, Comprehensive Planning Date: 4/10/2015 8:02:22 AM Name: PuigJudy Title: Operations Analyst, Community Development&Environmental Services Date: 4/10/2015 4:05:11 PM Name: StoneScott Title: Assistant County Attorney, CAO Land Use/Transportation Date: 4/14/2015 3:55:02 PM Packet Page=29- 4/28/2015 9.A. Name: CasalanguidaNick Title: Deputy County Manager, County Managers Office Date: 4/15/2015 8:02:55 AM Name: KlatzkowJeff Title: County Attorney, Date: 4/15/2015 1:47:46 PM Name: IsacksonMark Title: Division Director-Corp Fin &Mgmt Svc, Office of Management&Budget Date: 4/15/2015 1:59:30 PM Name: CasalanguidaNick Title: Deputy County Manager, County Managers Office Date: 4/16/2015 10:46:38 AM Packet Page-30- 4/28/2015 9.A. ORDINANCE NO. 15- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY ESTABLISHING THE VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT IN THE URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ONLY, COMMERCIAL ONLY OR MIXED USE PROJECT AT THE FOLLOWING DENSITY/INTENSITY: UP TO 7.3 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR A MAXIMUM OF 224 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, UP TO 250,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES, A 150 ROOM HOTEL, AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF 0.6. THE COMMERCIAL USES ALLOWED BY RIGHT ARE ALL PERMITTED USES AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-3 COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE ZONING DISTRICT, AND THREE PERMITTED USES AND ONE CONDITIONAL USE IN THE C-4 COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WITH CONVERSIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND U.S. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST) IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 30.68±ACRES, [PL20130001767/CP-2013-10] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Community Planning Act, formerly the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Petitioner, Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, PA on behalf of Global Properties, LLC, have initiated this amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series; and [14-CMP-00931/1167684/1] 101 1 PL20130001767/CP-2013-10—rev.416/15 Words underlined are additions; Words she are deletions *** *** *** ***are a break in text Packet Page -31- CA 4/28/2015 9.A. WHEREAS, Collier County transmitted the Growth Management Plan amendments to the Department of Economic Opportunity for preliminary review on November 10, 2014, after public hearings before the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Department of Economic Opportunity reviewed the amendments to the Future Land Use Element to the Growth Management Plan and transmitted its comments in writing to Collier County within the time provided by law; and WHEREAS, Collier County has 180 days from receipt of the Comments Report from the Department of Economic Opportunity to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendments to the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, Collier County has gathered and considered additional information, data and analysis supporting adoption of these amendments, including the following: the Collier County Staff Report, the documents entitled Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendments and other documents, testimony and information presented and made a part of the record at the public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission held on March 19, 2015, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners held on April 28,2015; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of the law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby adopted in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, and shall be transmitted to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after the state land planning agency notifies the local government that the plan [14-CMP-00931/1167684/1] 101 2 PL20130001767/CP-2013-10—rev.4/6/15 Words underlined are additions;Words strums are deletions *** *** *** ***are a break in text Packet Page-32- 4/28/2015 9.A. amendment package is complete. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the state land planning agency. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of 2015. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk TIM NANCE, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: q,yibi15 Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—Text and Maps [14-CMP-00931/1167684/1] 101 3 PL20130001767/CP-2013-I0-rev.4/6/15 Words underlined are additions;Words stRick-threu0 are deletions *** *** *** ***are a break in text Packet Page -33- �� 4, 4/28/2015 9.A. PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT [Page 10] Policy 1.1: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1 Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict 5. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict 8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict 11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict [Page 26] 12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban - Mixed Use District, PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict, Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed • Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial lnfill Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict, Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict; and, in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston RoadNeterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict; Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay; and, as allowed by certain FLUE policies. ***. **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** ***. [Page 46] 1 Words underlined are added:words sta4e14-thfaug14 are deleted, Row of asterisks(**** **** ****)denotes break in text. Version Date: 3-20-2015 Packet Page-34- Pc., [ o� 4/28/2015 9.A.- PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, is located on the south/west side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for neighborhood, community, and regional commercial development; residential development: and mixed use (commercial and residential) development. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and to provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In order to comply with Policy 1.10 of the Housing Element of the Growth Management Plan, residential development shall be limited to market-rate units so as to avoid the concentration of affordable housing in one location in the County. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The development of this Subdistrict shall comply with the following restrictions, limitations and standards: a. Allowable uses: The maximum intensity of commercial uses shall be limited to those allowed in the C-3 zoning district, both by right and by conditional use, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict. Additionally, the following uses are allowed: 1. Department store(5311), 2. Hotel (7011, hotel only), 3. Dental laboratories (8072), and 4. Nursing and personal care facilities (8051). b. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), one hotel (maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre, or portion thereof, of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet, or portion thereof for fractional amount under an acre. 2. Residential development shall be limited to a maximum density of 7.3 units per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the property exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 224 multi-family dwelling units. 3. If the project is developed as mixed use (residential and commercial uses), the residential density allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses, a 150-room hotel, and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. Additionally, for every acre, or portion thereof, of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet, or portion thereof for fractional amount under an acre. 4. A stand-alone automobile service station (i.e. retail fuel sales in coniunction with a convenience store) is prohibited; however, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery store (SIC 5411) or membership warehouse type facility (SIC 5311, 5331) greater than 15,000 square feet of GFA are allowed. 5. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts. 2 Words underlined are added;words stfuek-through are deleted Row of asterisks(**** **** ****)denotes break in text. Version Date: 3-20-2015 Packet Page-35- - - 4/28/2015 9.A. PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 c. Site Development: 1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The rezone ordinance shall contain development and design standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adiacent external uses, and shall include additional restrictions and standards necessary to ensure that uses and hours of operation are compatible with surrounding land uses. 2 The subject site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be submitted with the first Site Development Plan. 3 The unified planned development submitted at time of the first Site Development Plan will reflect internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. 4 Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties, where feasible, and between internal buildings. 5. At the time of Site Development Plan approval, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site,pursuant to Policy 6.1.1(13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan. At a minimum, 15 percent of the on-site native vegetation must be retained on-site. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However,a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee will not be required. ***x **** r*** *x** *.*xh *-*t* **tt* **** *x** **** *t** [Page 141] Urban Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Livingston RoadNeteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map Coastal High Hazard Area Map Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map I 3 Words underlined are added; words struck thretgt:i are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **`* ****)denotes break in text. Version Date: 3-20-2015 Packet Page -36- -Pmt 3 13 4/28/2015 9.A. EXHIBIT A PETITION PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 ARET VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT _J, �-''� COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA F • rf � \\-‘,<,,,,,,e/2\i,.‘,,,,,,f,'�"' '�.Y.�\.may ! `t ',..>, i A.,..'—�. .!-�,. rte, � r,,f ^, , y„,,,,,v,,,,,,,\` `/V� , 1 f x r / v �. Z ,-r. \ \l 1 �.. am }, \.,. • ,- \,..„. � f . ,f h„ r i\t ' ,,,....,,-^,-,„\--'AK- I r --„,, v ti r� ti ; ?r ■ _ i, rte J t LEGEND t. • SCALE \\\ SUBDISTRICT 1 PREPARED HY: CIS/CAC 1iAPP*4G SEC110H GROWTH MANAGEMENT DINSIDN/PW'IMNG AHD REGUt.AT)0H I O 1000 FT. 2000 FT. DATE: 7/2014 FILE CP-2013-10A.DMC Packet Page -37- Page 4 of AIL 4/28/2015 9.A.VVV I bib ■ ,.. . g 1,3 T 50 r.;ii;;':' S T 48 5 IInir...'.,.',,,, .; ,C g5451%:;I: T 48 Q „, .;?`-'r.,.;T-1:4. k;.; - ,..-1-,7:1-tz'l .1., -g.,-!.- ,:' i ;...v S-- 41 !iiC;., T;,i''Fplifflr,ii,:l iPi:l'EH 0 T 46 S ; T 47 S 1 11.1:'- Lillk•I •$ ': ';'?..'. 'if"11..!16!``-'-'k '.=:1,11;';`,' klko ; ..., 'i ,i;1'; '-2-;'`I'.■ :,7, ip: I's v ,f , -- - c.') I-1 '1,”'I' .,■,.....'21'.7.1§gi .t--1- 'LZ 1". ,5 ;:.4 < : ' I211I'l'IiIi lit- ;1-!'iI-I'l t 1,1_ - I-1.-- --°'''' Ila■IiIIISIOlitr11.1 • ..'I ' , " ' ''' .'.'-, _ • -• - 1' ''''. ' , ... . .,... , , , , ..... . .. . . .. , , . . . Z "-,,.: -:t i.' J i ,,,,„„,e# ' 1 7k* EE [1 m 11 D f t' = (Nk v 1 * . 8 g x ti.'. 5 5 g , ,' -v./ 3 . : I ' 5' 'Ir 8Iil I ' I I ' ' ' • ' 0 : I.6, g P — .#' '''', 1. 1 11-!"J.,; P 'f' '.',=''';',:,,!-.li, :vv i,:'N','''.'' ;I.' ri.i.,N1 ''.:-. '-,;"' i '; i -,i`,.;! " ' ''.'"'„ " - , , ' , ''',','''' , , '' ,., ''-''''',',„ , ',•,' ' ,,,, w = . ''o... ,., ,, i,i'....-..„§, '~'...- ' .,.'7."If ,.; :7 : ?..",,s:::-• 1.-'',;1 ' ''.1.''.'.. . ' ' ''' ',: ' ' ' ' -' ' ' <•4 I I , ' ' ' ' : ,' .1■1'.V., ' ' I :, i !i*Iit6 I--, _ . .,-,. . k P.,i ir, II" I ;I, '§ I5iI,,IiII 7,", i t iI;F:"2,,i , ..,!, ,,, 'Itt,',!311.!'l ' : ' ", , • cc W :I *;• l'': ; IiI,II.,' ,i:" -.5; ; '.'1.§"I''';I'15; PIt" ,!',':•.-.;;;p„13:, ' , ,, , ,,' , : -, ‘ -, ,,.. . . ' 17,1•;: :,:,,,,, : aZ-1.-i-...,-. .,- , ,.,., , ... i 11.= i ! '-`• r.,..c,,t. '' ..11 .11/,,.,Inn 4 . . .,,,!- '- ''gr-------unr,-:',.t.t It& . NL...-. ..- cc .. .. . , . ... .... , • V ' it .., ' ;'Z I • t rl .,,,#`1e , — I`*, ,/ ' ---- 1 - • , t ' ' . ,t , 1 1 , .,-4- ..'''''' J''''' r= X ' 1= ,,, - - "' I ,'- . ' a' '. -t ti,',*-,* - ; - 1 .: ; i L.' '''', ' '-; ' ' '1 LTII 1'"`" ' . , t. 1 1 . '"';` "01.11 .`"'''' -' - ' • i g t,14.:-V,<=-() , , -1,,. I ,1:11 c.■ 111111 '--1.'''''''''`III: ' ' ' 'II ' i.'.11.1'111"1,1 "r8.. _.,i1 t- '5-0,• . f': I ' . .. -.'77*,- .' i ,H1 '.5,..'P'' - • l.11!..,. -`,,..-.. .i. j _.,'',-. '-'-' - I ' ', i / Tfl..,- , ...,., LIJ C13 / , j (,. . CC ' , . - ''-.-' ■ ''.- .'",,, ,,,- . . ,.., , i ' .'•-,,`', ,,,: -- -., ,,,J.,n;,,,.,,,,7.-p....- -,- ...--i. ,, .. .-----44,1,4: ,• -' '',.. * '',:,:j. '-•,'...:+`,,e,—'-';'' ' '''' ''- ''rIA '--,;sw, _.,..., ■ .,;.1-' ' ,! ..T?"-‘,..^ -..,73,11',f:- :7;::.: ,..,,-:,,..v-i '':' '2 „,4rdi-,-,,v ..1*,-,3v.;',. . --,.-..-::,:v., 4..):. -,,,,,-,,,,,,-.' v,''''' a. ,,,Rzz-t!, .d_--- . 1.-,.1..i,.',,r--...- 4.1.,F,41:,:4i::;,.F, '' ' .' '''' • - ,,:-::•,',,,,,a,,,,,NNvri,..„;;:,-,-i,, `',0,#:,,-,.. .,-.,i,–)(' ,. ' ., ' cr i • A ,Lvt,,i,,,,iii,..-f7,1,11:1-, :.:L'W';',1i(t.i !-'.::''',,,.. : ' '''' . , .. ¢ it) 0 8 : Fcl.is IL: !, -- eNI Ei-- 1 ,'`.4,,'.•`L' 11 joirAciL: =.;;;•::-,= .......,;;•17 ,,,,s,,',,^••,,',J,i :1.,i.',' i - 'i! -il- 0 itil -!=t.'.i: ``' f'•:10 '' ', &'igi /-1:----,-;...:-1• 7,JF)16;-.,-.' . --,,, ,-- ',',,--;'-',',-.,...---'` 0 r...i (..) co v ....- u.111-1. e4 •ts —.It,' cA.' co c7)C;i u.1 C) t'S•;:-=-g D 0_ (f) 0 `”, = t a L. .. r ‘,1 S CS 1 . i''' () ; ' - I ' " ,‘; ,../i• (; ii;., .....,___-. page 5 °I. 5-- i et 1 Packet Page -38- I s at i s Li, 1 s ig I i S ZS I 1 4/28/2015 9.A. tfr' STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/PLANNING AND REGULATION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: MARCH 19, 2015 SUBJECT: 2013 CYCLE THREE, SINGLE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (ADOPTION HEARING) ELEMENT: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES Transmittal hearings on the subject amendment were held on August 21 and September 4, 2014 Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), and on October 14 and 28, 2014 Board of County Commissioners (BCC). The respective Transmittal recommendations/actions are presented further below, following the petition number and title. Within CCPC materials provided you will find the Transmittal Executive Summary from the BCC hearings and certain attachments referenced therein, plus the Transmittal CCPC staff report for the petition, which provides staff's detailed analysis of the petition. REVIEW AGENCY COMMENT LETTERS After review of the Transmitted GMP amendment, the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) rendered its Comment Letter indicating "no comment" within the agency's authorized scope of review, as did the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC)], Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (DACS), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) conducted a planning level analysis and rendered comments within their authorized scope of review. FDOT indicates that the proposed amendment is not anticipated to adversely impact important State transportation resources or facilities, and provided an additional comment regarding FDOT access standards; and, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) rendered comments within their authorized scope of review, indicating that the proposed amendment is not anticipated to adversely impact important State resources. The Florida Department of Education (DOE) rendered comments within their authorized scope of review, as follows: The Department recommends the changes associated with the proposed amendment CP- 2013-10 be reviewed as required by Section 8 of the Collier County interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency before adoption consideration. In response to the DOE Comment, staff notes the Transmittal package of materials was provided to School District representatives and subsequently reviewed in accordance with - 1 - STAFF REPORT ON 2013 CYCLE THREE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (ADOPTION HEARING) Packet Page-39- 4/28/2015 9.A. Interlocal Agreement Section 8. Determinations from their Section 8 review are found in a letter dated January 22, 2015, as attached hereto and summarized below. In accordance with Interlocal Agreement subsection 8.2, Collier County notified the School District of the proposed GMP amendment that may increase school enrollment. In accordance with lnterlocal Agreement subsection 14.2, the Collier County School District subsequently conducted the school planning level review per the Collier County Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency and responded. The School District response indicates at this time there is sufficient capacity for the proposed development for the elementary, middle and high school levels. This finding is for planning and informational purposes only and does not constitute either a determination of concurrency for the proposed project. At the time of site plan or plat the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity either within the concurrency service area the development is located within or adjacent concurrency service areas such that the level of service standards are not exceeded. The Comments Letters received are located within materials provided to the CCPC. The remaining reviewing agency, Department of State, Bureau of Historic Preservation, did not provide a Comment Letter. Within CCPC materials provided is an Ordinance with Exhibit "A" text and maps for the petition; those exhibits reflect the FLUE text and maps as approved by BCC for Transmittal. PROPOSED AMENDMENT PETITION CP-2013-10 / PL2013-0001767, requesting amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan, to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. The subject property, consisting of±30.68 acres, is located south and east of Southwest Boulevard, south and west of US 41 (Tamiami Trail East), and west of the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. This petition seeks to establish the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict to allow for entirely commercial development, for entirely residential development, or for mixed use (commercial and residential) development. Commercial development is limited to 250,000 square feet of gross floor area, one hotel of up to 150 rooms and an assisted living facility. Commercial uses allowed are the permitted and conditional uses of the C-3 zoning district plus hotel, dental labs, skilled nursing facilities, and department stores. Residential development is limited to a maximum of 224 market rate multi-family units. Mixed Use development limits commercial intensity to 128,000 square feet of gross floor area, one hotel of up to 150 rooms and an assisted living facility on no more than 10 acres, and residential density based on 7.3 units per non-commercial acre. The Subdistrict also provides for conversions if the project is developed with a hotel or assisted living facility, for automobile fuel pumps accessory to a grocer or membership warehouse-type facility larger than 15,000 square feet of gross floor area and, for a recreational site for use by residents of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks. Note: A companion PUD rezone petition is scheduled for this same hearing. TRANSMITTAL STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Not to Transmit to DEO. CCPC RECOMMENDATION: Transmit to DEO (vote: 4/2), with the density reduction [from 11.74 DU/ac. to 10.0 DU/ac.] and with further modification of the amendment to reduce the maximum number of dwelling units from 360 to 307 DU, remove maximum building heights from Subdistrict provisions, calculate residential density on non-commercial acreage only, prohibit affordable-workforce housing, reduce commercial intensity from the initially proposed C-5 -2- STAFF REPORT ON 2013 CYCLE THREE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (ADOPTION HEARING) Packet Page-40- 4/28/2015 9.A. commercial uses to C-3 and other additional specific uses, prohibit a stand-alone automobile fuel station and, introduce conversion factors for certain uses. BCC ACTION: Transmitted to DEO (vote: 4/1), with the density reduction [from 10.0 DU/ac. to 7.3 DU/ac. for a maximum 224 DU total] and with further modification of the amendment to reduce the number of additional specific commercial uses allowed. ADOPTION STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the CCPC forward the single, 2013 Cycle 3 petition to the BCC with a recommendation not to adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and reviewing agencies that provided comments. IF the Planning Commission chooses to recommend adoption, staff recommends the following revisions to portions of the Subdistrict text to remove an unnecessary intensity standard for the hotel use no longer contained in the LDC. [Words underlined are added—as Transmitted; Words double underlined are added, and words double stRak4iweiiej14 are deleted—as recommended by staff] 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, is located on the south/west side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for neighborhood, community, and regional commercial development; residential development; and mixed use (commercial and residential) development. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and to provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In order to comply with Policy 1.10 of the Housing Element of the Growth Management Plan, residential development shall be limited to market-rate units so as to avoid the concentration of affordable housing in one location in the County. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. *** *** *** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** b. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), and one hotel (maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. 2. Residential development shall be limited to a maximum density of 7.3 units per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the property exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 224 multi-family dwelling units. 3. If the project is developed as mixed use (residential and commercial uses), the residential density allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses, and a 150-room hotel and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS This staff report has been approved as to form and legality by the Office of the County Attorney. [HFAC] -3 - STAFF REPORT ON 2013 CYCLE THREE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT(ADOPT70NHEARING) Packet Page-41- 4/28/2015 9.A. PREPARED BY: PA 1 DATE: ;24 ELL 1�7 CORBY SCH IDT,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER COMPREHE SIVE PLANNING SECTION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: _ 4\ DATE: DAVID WEEKS, AICP; GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: DATE: 2- 2 S - MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: DATE: NICK CASALANSUIDA "ADMlN1STRATOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 2013 Cycle 3 GMPA-Adoption (petition CP-2013-10/PL2013-0001767). Staff Report for the March 19, 2015, CCPC Meeting. NOTE: This single petition 2013.3 Cycle GMPA has been scheduled for the April 28, 2015, BCC Meeting. -4 - STAFF REPORT ON 2013 CYCLE THREE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT(ADOPTION HEARING) Packet Page -42- 4/28/2015 9.A. . �'(N.FN rbG OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER �� u THE CAPITOL (850)617-7700 r'o -aq 400 SOUTH MONROE STREET ' if 4+"`3' TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-o800 0 Mr�h'sum„ FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES COMMISSIONER.ADAM H. PUTNAM. December 10, 2014 VIA EMAIL(davidweeks @colliergov.net) Collier County Growth Management Division Attn: David Weeks 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: DACS Docket#--20141117-484 Collier County CP-2013-10/PL20130001767 Submission dated November 10,2014 Dear Mr.Weeks: The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services(the"Department") received the above- referenced proposed comprehensive plan amendment on November 17, 2014 and has reviewed it pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes to address any potential adverse impacts to important state resources or facilities related to agricultural, aquacultural,or forestry resources in Florida if the proposed amendment(s)are adopted. Based on our review of your county's submission, the Department has no comment on the proposal. If we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 850-410-2289. Sincerely, 1 _ ' . / / ' 4.i....., " i Stormie Knight Sr. Management Analyst I Office of Policy and Budget cc: Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (SLPA#: Collier County 14-5 ESR) `qtr, Fresh t-800-H ELPFLA Florida www.FreshFromFlorida.com Packet Page-43- 4/28/2015 9.A. Rick Scott Jesse Panuccio GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FLORIDA DEPARTMENT‘f ECONOMIC OPPORTUNriY December 10, 2014 The Honorable Tom Henning, Chairman Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 Naples, Florida 34112-5746 Dear Chairman Henning: The Department of Economic Opportunity has completed its review of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment for Collier County (Amendment No. 14-5ESR), which was received on November 12, 2014. We have reviewed the proposed amendment pursuant to Sections 163.3184(2) and (3), Florida Statutes (F.S.), and identified no comments related to important state resources and facilities within the Department's authorized scope of review that will be adversely impacted by the amendment if adopted. The County is reminded that pursuant to Section 163.3184(3)(b), F.S., other reviewing agencies have the authority to provide comments directly to the County. If other reviewing agencies provide comments, we recommend the County consider appropriate changes to the amendment based on those comments. If unresolved, such reviewing agency comments could form the basis for a challenge to the amendment after adoption. The County should act by choosing to adopt, adopt with changes, or not adopt the proposed amendment. Also, please note that Section 163.3184(3)(c)1, F.S., provides that if the second public hearing is not held within 180 days of your receipt of agency comments,the amendment shall be deemed withdrawn unless extended by agreement with notice to the Department and any affected party that provided comment on the amendment. For your assistance, we have enclosed the procedures for adoption and transmittal of the comprehensive plan amendment. Florida Department of hconomic Opportunity Caldwell 13zu1dm1; 107 Madison Street Tallahassee,FL 32399 866.11.;1.23.15 850.245.7105 ; 850.921.3223 Fax n;•,zz_mitrcr.corn lI;3 yVO W.tac:eboOk.coin 11)FO Packet Page-44- The Honorable Tom Henning, 1 4/28/2015 9.A. December 10, 2014 Page 2 of 2 If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact Scott Rogers, Planning Analyst, at (850) 717-8510, or by email at scott.rogers@d.eo.myflorida.com. Sincerely, Ana Richmond, Chief Bureau of Community Planning AR/sr Enclosure: Procedures for Adoption cc: Michael Bosi, Director, Collier County Planning& Zoning Department Margaret Wuerstle, Executive Director,Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Packet Page-45- 4/28/2015 9.A. SUBMITTAL OF ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR EXPEDITED STATE REVIEW Section 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes NUMBER OF COPIES TO BE SUBMITTED: Please submit three complete copies of all comprehensive plan materials, of which one complete paper copy and two complete electronic copies on CD ROM in Portable Document Format (PDF)to the Department of Economic Opportunity and one copy to each entity below that provided timely comments to the local government:the appropriate Regional Planning Council; Water Management District; Department of Transportation; Department of Environmental Protection; Department of State;the appropriate county (municipal amendments only); the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (county plan amendments only); and the Department of Education (amendments relating to public schools); and for certain local governments,the appropriate military installation and any other local government or governmental agency that has filed a written request. SUBMITTAL LETTER: Please include the following information in the cover letter transmitting the adopted amendment: Department of Economic Opportunity identification number for adopted amendment package; Summary description of the adoption package, including any amendments proposed but not adopted; Identify if concurrency has been rescinded and indicate for which public facilities. (Transportation, schools, recreation and open space). Ordinance number and adoption date; Certification that the adopted amendment(s) has been submitted to all parties that provided timely comments to the local government; Name,title, address, telephone, FAX number and e-mail address of local government contact; Letter signed by the chief elected official or the person designated by the local government. 1 Effective:June 2, 2011(Updated March 11, 2013) Packet Page-46- 4/28/2015 9.A. From: Stahl, Chris [mailto:Chris.Stahl @dep.state.fl.us] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 1:57 PM To: WeeksDavid Cc: Craig, Kae; DEO Agency Comments Subject: Collier County 14-5ESR— Proposed [CP-2013-10, Vincentian] To: David Weeks, Growth Management Plan Director Re: Collier County 14-5ESR—Review of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment The Office of Intergovernmental Programs of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (Department) has reviewed the above-referenced amendment package under the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes.The Department conducted a detailed review that focused on potential adverse impacts to important state resources and facilities, specifically: air and water pollution;wetlands and other surface waters of the state; federal and state-owned lands and interest in lands, including state parks,greenways and trails, conservation easements;solid waste; and water and wastewater treatment. Based on our review of the submitted amendment package,the Department has found no provision that, if adopted, would result in adverse impacts to important state resources subject to the Department's jurisdiction. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Chris Stahl Office of Intergovernmental Programs Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS 47 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 (850) 245-2169 +►, Customer ` Service Survey DEP Transmittal Review Comments 12-1-14 G:ICDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA Comp Plan Amendments12013 Cycles&Small Scale Petitions12013 Cycle 3- October12013.3 Letters to or from DEO_State-Trans&Adopt dw/12-1-14 Packet Page-47- 4/28/2015 9.A. SA FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF lop EDUCATION State Board of Education fldoc.org Pam Stewart Commissioner of Education Gary Chartrand,Chair John R.Padget,Vice Chair Members Ada G.Armas,M.D. John A.Colon Marva Johnson Rebecca Fishman Lipsey Andy Tuck December 4, 2014 Mr. David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Plan Manager Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Via E-mail: davidweeks(a�colliergov.net Re: Collier County 14-5 ESR Dear Mr. Weeks: On November 14, 2014, the Department of Economic Opportunity(DEO) notified me of its receipt of the Collier County proposed 14-5ESR comprehensive plan amendment. Because the county did not provide a copy to the Florida Department of Education, I accessed the proposed amendment package through the DEO's online plan amendment archive, Florida PAPERs. According to the department's responsibilities under section 163.3184(3)(b), Florida Statutes, I reviewed the amendment package considering the provisions of chapter 163, part II, F.S., and to determine whether the proposal, if adopted, would have the potential to create adverse effects on public school facilities. The amendment relates to petition PL2013001767/CP-2013-10, which proposes an amendment of the future land use element text and map to establish the Vincentian Mixed-Use District. Although the application and staff report assert that there are no effects on public school facilities,the proposal's intent to permit up to an additional 307 residential dwellings appears to have the potential to increase demands for public school capacity, and thus must be analyzed for such effects. Given this, I contacted Amy Lockhart, AICP, with the Collier County Public Schools, to request an analysis. Because she had not received the proposed amendment, she was not able to provide one. Prior to considering adoption of the amendment, the county and the applicant should complete the school planning level review required by section 8 of the Collier County Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School Concurrency. If the planning level review indicates that a planning solution is necessary to address any estimated deficit, the county should revise the amendment to adopt an appropriate solution. Thomas H.Inserra Director,Office of Educational Facilities 325 W.Gaines Street,Suite 1 Packet Page-48-32399-0400 1 850-245-0494 ©2014,Florida Department of Education.All Rights Reserved. 4/28/2015 9.A. Mr. David Weeks, AICP December 4, 2014 Page Two Section 163.3184(1), F.S., defines the department as a reviewing agency to receive comprehensive plan amendments that relate to public schools. It has been my understanding that amendments that relate to public schools include those that propose an increase in residential density(whether by text or map amendment), propose a change in land use proximate to an existing or future public school site or to accommodate a future school, or propose policy revisions that would affect intergovernmental coordination with the school district regarding public educational facilities. Please direct such future amendments to my attention at the letterhead address. If you prefer to save the costs of copying and mailing amendments, I would welcome transmittal via e-mail to the address listed below. If you have questions about this letter, or if I may be of assistance,please contact me at 850-245- 9312 or tracy.suber a,fldoe.org. Sin erely, / 4 �, ' , Tracy It. Suber Growth Management and Facilities Policy Liaison TDS/ cc: Ms. Amy Lockhart, AICP, Collier County Public Schools Ms. Brenda Winningham, DEO/State Land Planning Agency Mr. Scott Rogers, DEO/State Land Planning Agency Packet Page-49- 4/28/2015 9.A. DO •.. Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT 10041 Daniels Parkway ANANTN PRASAD,P.E. GOVERNOR For Myers,FL 33913 SECRETARY November 25, 2014 Mr. David Weeks,AICP Growth Management Plan Manager Collier County Growth Management Division/Planning&Regulation Planning &Zoning Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples,Florida 34104 RE: Collier County 14-5ESR Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Expedited State Review Process)— FDOT Comments and Recommendations Dear Mr. Weeks: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District One, has reviewed the Collier County 14-5ESR, Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment, transmitted under the Expedited State Review process (transmitted by the Board of County Commissioners on October 28, 2014) in accordance with the requirements of Florida Statutes (F.S.) Chapter 163. The Department offers Collier County the following comments and recommendations for your consideration regarding the proposed amendment. CP-2013-10 (Text and Map Amendment): The subject site comprises 30.7 acres, lies within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA), and is generally located south and east of Southwest Boulevard, south and west of US 41 (Tamiami Trail East), and west of the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park in Collier County, Florida. The comprehensive plan amendment proposes to amend the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to introduce a new Subdistrict and to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Mixed Use District (UMUD), Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict (UCFS) to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict (VMUS). The subject property (Vincentian project) was initially approved as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) per Collier County Ordinance 99-37. The approved Vincentian PUD includes 57,500 square feet of commercial uses, 57,500 square feet of general office and 40 single family residential dwelling units, which would result in 447 p.m. peak hour trips (after the reduction of the internal capture and pass-by trips). \xrxxrxxr first ctatn fl nc Packet Page-50- 4/28/2015 9.A. Mr. David Weeks Collier County 14-SESR—FDOT Comments and Recommendations November 25,2014 Page 2of5 Based on the information provided in the traffic study and the staff report, the proposed Vincentian PUD Amendment will continue to develop as a mixed-use commercial project. The proposed land-use includes 190,000 square feet of commercial uses, a hotel (100 rooms) and 57,500 square feet of general office, which would result in 851 p.m. peak hour trips (after the reduction of the internal capture and pass-by trips). As indicated in the following tables, the proposed development could result in a net increase of 404 p.m. peak hour trips. TRIP GENERATION AS PROPOSED ITE Size of Development Land Use Land PM Scenario Peak Designation Use Acres Allowed Code Development Trips s SF 210 40 DU's 46 Residential General 710 30.7 57,500 sf 143 Office Shopping 820 57,500 sf 413 Center Existing internal Capture Trips 58 Pass-By Trips= 97 Total(Existing Condition) 447 Hotel 310 100 Occ. 70 Rooms General 710 30.7 57,500 sf 143 Office Shopping 820 190,000 sf 921 Center Proposed Internal Capture Trips 60 Pass-By Trips' 223 Total(Proposed Condition) 851 Change in Trips +404 1. Trip generation based on the rates and equations obtained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition). 2. A pass by rate was limited to a maximum of 25% of the trips generated by the shopping center, per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures. As seen in the following tables, a planning level analysis was prepared to establish whether state roadways in the vicinity of the project will operate at their adopted level of service (LOS) www.dot.state.fl.us Packet Page-51- 4/28/2015 9.A. Mr.David Weeks Collier County 14-5ESR—FDOT Comments and Recommendations November 25.2014 Page 3of5 standards, as identified within the Collier County's comprehensive plan during the existing (2013), short-term (2019).. and long term (2035)horizon year conditions. YEAR 2013 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2013 Conditions From To SIS? Count} LOS Roadway Std. Service' PM Peak No.of Lanes LOS Acceptable? Volume Hour L'ol. CR 864; US 41 Rattlesnake Tree Tops N E 6 5,660 3,105 C Yes Hammock Rd. Dt, CR US 41 Tree Tops Dr. 951 Collier N E 6 5.660 2,520 C Yes Blvd. North of SR 951 Championship US 41 N D 4 3,759 2,565 C Yes Dr. 1. PM Peat;Hour Two-lfay Service Volume at the County Adopted LOS Standard. YEAR 2019 SHORT-TERM HORIZON ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2019 Conditions Roadway From To No.of Service' 20142 Project' Project Total Background % OS Acceptable? Lanes Volume Dist./o Ti Tatfic Traffic Traffic CR 864 US 41 Rattlesnake Tree ops 6 5,660 3,474 60% 242 3,716 C Yes Hammock Rd CR US 41 Tree Tops Dr. 951/Collier 6 5,660 2,826 35% 141 2,967 C Yes Blvd North of SR 951 Championship US 41 4 3,759 2,871 10% 40 2,911 C Yes Dr. 1. PM Peak Hour Two-Way Service Volume at the County Adopted LOS Standard. 2. The short-term planning horizon year 2019 background volumes were obtained using trends analysis based growth rates. 3. The project traffic distribution percentages were obtained based on the information provided in the traffic study. wWw.dot.state.fl.us Packet Page -52- 4/28/2015 9.A. Mr. David Weeks Collier County 14-5ESR—FDOT Comments and Recommendations November 25,2014 Page 4 of 5 YEAR 2035 LONG-TERM HORIZON ROADWAY CONDITIONS 2035 Conditions From To 20352 Roadway No.of Service' Background Project' Project Total LOS Acceptable? Lanes VON rne Dist./u Traffic Traffic Traffic CR 864/ US 41 Rattlesnake Tree Tops 6 5,660 4,473 60% Di 242 4,715 C Yes Hammock Rd CR US 41 Tree Tops Dr. 951/Collier 6 5,660 3,627 35% 141 3,768 C Yes Blvd North of SR 951 Championship US 41 4 3,759 3,690 10% 40 3,730 D Yes Dr. 1. PM Peak Hour Two-Way Service Volume at the County Adopted LOS Standard. 2. The long-term planning horizon year 2035 background volumes were obtained using trends analysis based growth rates. 3. The project traffic distribution percentages were obtained based on the information provided in the traffic study. FDOT Comment# 1: The Department has determined that the changes associated with the proposed amendment CP-2013-10 are not anticipated to adversely impact important state transportation resources or facilities. FDOT Comment#2: The subject property is located along the west side of US 41. Any access to US 41 will be subject to FDOT permitting process as described in Rule 14-96 FAC The FDOT may require that the applicant provide mitigation for any such impacts as a condition of a permit. The FDOT Access Management standard for US 41 is access class 3 from CR 864/Rattlesnake Hammock Road (M.P. 15.834) to Joseph Lane (M.P. 23.188). The FDOT standards for access class 3 require a minimum spacing of 2,640 feet (one half of a mile) for signals and full median openings, 1,320 feet (one quarter of a mile)for directional median openings, and 660 feet (one eighth of a mile) between access points for any single parcel, at posted speed limits greater than 45 MPH. www.dot.state.fl.us Packet Page -53- 4/28/2015 9.A. Mr. David Weeks Collier County 14-5ESR—FDOT Comments and Recommendations November 25,2014 Page 5of5 Thank you for providing FDOT with the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed amendment. If you have any questions please free to contact me at(239) 225-1981 or sarah.catala @dot.state.fl.us. Sincerely, (Sc,,\-4g Sarah Catala SIS/Growth Management Coordinator FDOT District One CC: Mr. Ray Eubanks, Florida Department of Economic Opportunity www.dot.state.fLus Packet Page-54- 4/28/2015 9.A. From: Hight, Jason [mailto:Jason.Hight©MyFWC.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:45 PM To: DCPexternalagencycomments; WeeksDavid Cc: Wallace,Traci; Chabre, Jane; Poole, Mary Ann Subject: Collier County 14-5ESR (CP-2013-10) Mr. Weeks: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission(FWC) staff has reviewed proposed comprehensive plan amendment in accordance with Chapter 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes. We have no comments, recommendations, or objections related to fish and wildlife or listed species and their habitat to offer on this amendment. If you need any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Jane Chabre either by phone at(850)410-5367 or at FWCConservationP lanningServicesaMyFWC.com. If you have specific technical questions, please contact Mary Ann Poole at(850) 488-8783 or by email at maryann.poole(&:MyFWC.com. Sincerely, Jason Hight Biological Administrator II Office of Conservation Planning Services Division of Habitat and Species Conservation 620 S. Meridian Street, MS 5B5 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1600 (850) 228-2055 FFWCC Transmittal Review Comments 11-24-14 G:ICDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments12013 Cycles&Small Scale Petitions12013 Cycle 3- October12013.3 Letters to or from DEO_State-Trans&Adopt dw/11-24-14 Packet Page-55- 4/28/2015 9.A. 44-:.„sr,,,,—P4EC OQ • SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT �r. . s December 4, 2014 Nick Casalanguida, Administrator Growth Management Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Collier County, DEO #14-5ESR Comments on Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Package Dear Mr. Casalanguida: The South Florida Water Management District (District) has completed its review of the proposed amendment package from Collier County (County). The amendment creates the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict by adding policies and changing the land use designation on a 30.7 acre parcel. There appear to be no regionally significant water resource issues; therefore, the District forwards no comments on the proposed amendment package. The District offers its technical assistance to the County and the Department of Economic Opportunity in developing sound, sustainable solutions to meet the County's future water supply needs and to protect the region's water resources. Please forward a copy of adopted amendments to the District. For assistance or additional information, please contact Deborah Oblaczynski, Policy and Planning Analyst, at (561) 682-2544 or doblaczy(c�sfwmd.gov. Sincerely, 09,--- Pv\e-0 Dean Powell Water Supply Bureau Chief DP/do c: Ray Eubanks, DEO Deborah Oblaczynski, SFWMD David Weeks, AICP, Collier County Brenda Winningham, DEO Margaret Wuerstle, SWFRPC 3301 Gun Club Road,West Palm Beach,Florida 33406 • (561)686-8800 • FL WATS 1-800-432-2045 Mailing Address: P.O.Box 24680,West Palm Beach,FL 33416-4680 • www.sfwmd.gov Packet Page-56- 4/28/2015 9.A. 1826 Victoria Avenue Fort Myers, FL P 239.335.2550 I F:239.33t1.25S01 3,19fli $ , wv.11.v,Rwrremorn x December 18,2014 Mr. D. Ray Eubanks Adniini strator Plan Review and Processing Department of Economic Opportunity 107 East Madison Street—MSC 160 Tallahassee. Florida 32399-4120 Re: Collier County /DEO 14-5ESR Dear Mr. Eubanks: The staff of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council has reviewed the requested amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). The review was performed according to the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act. The Council will review the proposed amendments to the Collier County (IMP at its January 15, 2015 meeting. Council staff has recommended that Council find the changes described in CP- 2013-1011'120130001767 as riot regionally significant. and consistent with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan (SRPP). Council staff has recommended that the Council find that the requested changes do not produce adverse effects to significant regional resources and support the recommendation of the Collier County Emergency Management requiring that the developer provide a one-time developer contribution of a generator to mitigate impact for hurricane evacuation concerns. The generator as specified by the Collier County Emergency Management allows for additional evacuee capacities at various shelter(s) that can be used based on the storm factors associated with development in the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). Council staff also recommended that Council find that the requested changes do not produce adverse effects to facilities found in the SRPP and that the proposed changes do not produce extra-jurisdictional impacts that are inconsistent with the comprehensive plans of any other local government A copy of the official staff report explaining the Council staffs recommendation is attached. if Council action differs from the staff recommendation, we will notify you. Sincerely, (lnuthwest Florida Regio al Planning Council 400. Margare AICP Ex ecuti ireCtOr MAVIMAD Attachment Cc; Nick Casalariguida, Administrator, Growth Managernem Division,Collier County Packet Page-57- 4/28/2015 9.A. LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS COLLIER COUNTY The Council staff has reviewed proposed changes to the Collier County Growth Management Plan DEO 14-5ESR. The changes were developed as a result of the 2013 Cycle 3 Growth Management Plan amendments. A synopsis of the requirements of the Act and Council responsibilities is provided as Attachment L Comments are provided in Attachment EL Site location maps can be reviewed in Attachment III. Staff review of the proposed amendments was based on whether they were likely to be of regional concern. This was determined through assessment of the following factors; 3. Location—M or near a regional resource or regional ;activity center, such that it impacts the regional resource or facility; on or within one mile of a county boundary; generally applied to sites of five acres or more; size alone is not necessari 1 y a de term i n ant of regioail significance 2. Mannitude--equaI to or izreatcr than the threshold for a Development of Regional Impact of the same type (a DRi-related amendment is considered regionally significant); and 3. Character—of a unique type or use, a use of regional significance, or a change in the local comprehensive plan that could he applied throughout the local jurisdiction; updates. ediiorial rcvision . ;lc. arc not regionally significant. A summary of the results of the review follows: Proposed Factors of Regional Si enificance Amendment Location Magnitude Character Consistent. DEO 4-5ESR no no no (I) not regionall,y significant; and (CP-2013-10/ P1 20130001767)) (2) consistent with SRPP RECC)141=NDED ACTION: Approve staff comments. Authorize staff to forward comments to the Dcp •artment-of Economic Opportunity and Collier County. 1/15 Packet Page-58- Y6 51.0Z/8Z/t7 Attachmei COMMUNITY PLANNING ACT Local Government Comprehensive Plans The Act requires each municipal and county government to prepare a comprehensive plan that must include at least the following nine elements: 1. Future Land Use Element; 2. Traffic Circulation Element; A local government with all or part of its jurisdiction within the urbanized area of a Metropolitan Planning Organization shall prepare and adopt a transportation element to replace the traffic circulation; mass transit; and ports, aviation, and related facilities elements. [9J-5.019(1),FAC] 3. General Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element; 4. Conservation Element; _ 5. Recreation and Open Space Element; 6. Housing Element; 7. Coastal Management Element for coastal jurisdictions; 8. Intergovernmental Coordination Element; and 9. Capital Improvements Element. The local government may add optional elements (e. g., community design, redevelopment, safety,historical and scenic preservation, and economic). All local governments in Southwest Florida have adopted revised plans: Charlotte County, Punta Gorda Collier County, Everglades City,Marco Island,Naples Glades County, Moore Haven Hendry County, Clewiston, LaBelle Lee County,Bonita Springs, Cape Coral, Fort Myers,Fort Myers Beach, Sanibel Sarasota County, Longboat Key,North Port, Sarasota,Venice Page 1 -65-aSed }aNaed 4/28/2015 9.A. Attachment I Comprehensive Pi211 itrendments A local government may amend its plan at any time during the calendar year. Six copies of the amendment are sent to the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for review. A copy is also sem to the Regional Planning Council, the Water Management District, the Florida De-partment of Transportation, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The proposed amendments will be reviewed by DEO in two situations. In the first, there must be a wrritten request to DEO. The request for review must be received within forty- five days after transmittal of the proposed amendment. Reviews can be requested by one of the following: • the loeal government that transmits the amendment, • the regional planning council, or • an affecteel person. In the second situation, DEO can decide to review the proposed amendment without a request. In that case, DEO must give notice within thirty days of transmittal. Within five working days after deciding to conduct a review, DEO may forward copies to various reviewing agencies, including the Regional Planning Council. Regional Nanning Cecina aeview lie Regional Planning Council must submit its comments in writing within thirty days of rezeipt of the proposed amenerni ent from DLO. It must specify any objections and may make recommendations for changes. The review of the proposed amendment by the Regional Planning Council must be limited to "effects on regional resources or facilities identified in the Strategic Regional Policy plan and extra-jurisdictional impacts which would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan of the affected local government. After receipt uf comments from the Regional Planning Council and other reviewing aucticies, DEO has thirty days to conduct its own review and determine compliance with state law. Within that thirty-day period, DEC) transmits its written comments to the local government_ NOTE: THE ABOVE IS A SiliPLIFIED VERSIOI°,: OF THE LAW, REFER TO THE STATUTE(CH. 163, FS) FOR DETAILS. Pizge 2 Packet Page -60- "Vd'6 S L.0Z/8Z/i Atta tent II SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW FORM 01 LOCAL GOVERMENT: Collier County DATE AMENDMENT RECIEVED: November 12, 2014 PATE AMENDMENT MAILED TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND STATE: Pursuant to Section 163.3184,Florida Statutes, Council review of proposed amendments to local government Comprehensive Plans is limited to adverse effects on regional resources and facilities identified in the Strategic Regional Policy Plan and extra jurisdictional impacts that would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan of any affected local government within the region. A written report containing the evaluation of these impacts, pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, is to be provided to the local government and the State land planning agency within 30 calendar days of receipt of the amendment. 1. Amendment Name Collier County Vincentian Mixed Use Sub-District GMP 2. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT(S): This petition was submitted by Collier County staff at the Board of County Commissioners direction to amend the County's Growth Management Plan (GMP). The amendment would change the,Future Land Use Element, and Future Land Use Map. The specific the change to the Collier County GMP follows. Growth Management Plan Amendment (CP-201340) Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and the Future Land Use Map(FLUM) This petition was submitted by Christopher Shucart, do Global Properties of Naples, LLC, and is requesting an amendment to the County's Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to re-designate the 30.7 acre subject site from the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Sub-District to the Vincentian Mixed Use Sub- District. The site is comprised of 30.7 undeveloped land, located South of US-41, East of Southwest Boulevard, West of the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park and North of a single family 1 -19-aged 1951Ded 4/28/2015 9.A. subdivision. The existing land uses in the area immediately surrounding or directly opposite the site are predominately residential in nature. The subject site will be served by Collier County Water District potable water treatment and distribution system, Collier County Sewer District wastewater collection and treatment system, and by Collier County Solid Waste Management. If adopted by the County, the amendment would allow the site to develop entirely as commercial (250.00 square feet and 150 unit hotel, and assisted living facility at 0.6 FAR), entirely as residential (224 dwelling units or 7.3 DU/A), or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. This amendment would allow new rights to the property which is located in the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHIIA) to develop with residential density not presently allowed by the FLUE. Council staff reviewed the proposed amendment request and found that the request was not regionally significant due to its lack of magnitude, location and character; that the proposed development would not substantially impact any regional resources or facilities; and that the proposed changes would not impact any adjacent jurisdiction. Staff further supports the recommendation of the Collier County Emergency Management to require that the developer provide a one-iime contribution of a generator, meeting county specifications, to mitigate impacts from hurricane evacuation concerns. 3. ADVERSE EFFECTS TO SIGNIFICANT REGIONAL RESOURCES AND FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN TILE STRATEGIC REGIONAL POLICY PLAN: The re nested change to the GMP is determined by the Council staff to he consistent with the Goals of the SRPP. Council staff finds that the proposed amendment does not adversely affect any significant regional resources or facilities that are identified in the Strategic Regional Policy Plan. 4. EXTRA-,:' IRISDICTIONAL IMPACTS IINCONS STFAT WITH THE COPtIPRe:LiENSWE PLANS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WITHIN TILE REGION Council staff has reviewed the proposed amendments with respect to extra-jurisdictional impacts on surrounding local government Comprehensive Plans and finds that the proposed amendment does not negatively impact and is not inconsistent with adjacent local 14ol,ernmentzd Comprehensive Plans. Re,4tlest a ccily of tie adopted version cf the amendment? X No Packet Page-62- '`o/'6 S L-0Z/83/i7 Attachment III a s Collier County DEO 14-4ESR Growth Management Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment -E9- aSed laced 4/28/2015 9.A. Attzehment M Collier County DEO 14-5ESR ,.. r a — ' FLI '.,, ,.' ' Z • ' , . . ,- , ....... . _ . flit; 7 - , 0, •,, '- r . r.. , ...- , Ititain 1 Immt , ^ VArkrarte7TArttlePul .; ' """ !,-, ,-... Zeourp.7,141 ,.. ..,..... . . _ ......,_ .„. ., .... , : - ... ,, „ '''''• . .--,-......- --... ,. . .. '• • ,=• 1 / ..... . • •„ „ . , /Vi.n.certtian Itillted.Use Sub-T)istriet . . . . . . , .. Packet Page -64- 'Y 6 51,OZ/2Z/17 Attachment Collier County EO 14-5 SR V r & 4 ✓ nbf mod. � . e r at yjs, k..14:;'1,5„.:,,, 1 k'' y. •: _ a if d 411` '�31 '*fin a -W �' ' re,amibw. , ��bir ■arr. +*: , S0'444134°4.x t # �. f. `" '' a �➢ ,�yp_ �T�y yiHf xlh iRT � 9� x ,m " baiiJ�,,gae xy,PJY*.ITn ..y3 f ,� x ^ _ .ems - Iltst9lsit41+s 'P Ck n r Ri tr.rH�s r . :`,. -- r�awT bxxw► #A A rax 0,01404-001=.7,,, ,,,ter..+ A. '-T t ,,, r d ,,,,/,,,,,,„ --da ;5' - vincentian ylised Use Sub-District -Sg-aSed la1Jed 4/28/2015 9.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to consider approving the 2013 Cycle 3 of Growth Management Plan Amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for review and Comments response, one petition only Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict, Transmittal Hearing. OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to review the 2013 Cycle 3 amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan(GMP) and consider approving said amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. CONSIDERATIONS: • Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government's adopted Growth Management Plan. • The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the "local planning agency" under Chapter 163.3174, F.S., held their Transmittal hearing for the 2013 Cycle 3 petition on August 21 and September 4, 2014. • This Transmittal hearing for the 2013 Cycle 3 considers an amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map. Note: Because the support materials (petition only) is voluminous, and some exhibits are oversized, the Agenda Central system contains as noted, "confidential" the related document pertaining to this GMP amendment. A link has been provided to the `I' drive on page 4 of this document in order to view the document. The entire Executive Summary package, including all support materials, is available for review in the Comprehensive Planning Section of the Planning & Zoning Department office, located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, including the Comprehensive Punning Section GMP Amendments web page, via http://www.colliergov.net/index.aspx?page=2460. The entire Executive Summary package is also available in the Clerk of Courts/Minutes and Records office at 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 4th floor, Suite 401. Petition PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 is a petition submitted by Christopher Shucart, requesting Future Land Use Element (FLUE) amendment to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. The Vincentian Subdistrict site comprises 30.7 acres and is located south and east of Southwest Boulevard, south and west of US 41 (Tamiami Trail East), and west of the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. Among the factors analyzed are Background and Considerations, Commercial Analysis, Apartment Analysis, Residential Density and Land Use Intensities, Appropriateness of the Site, Consistency with Coastal High Hazard Area Policies within the Growth Management Plan, Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Impact Study Analysis, and Public Facilities Impact. The following findings and conclusions result from the reviews and analyses of this request: • The subject site was approved in 1999 for mixed use development only — not stand-alone commercial or residential development. • More than 12,000 approved, but un-built dwelling units are proximate to this site. Packet Page-66- 4/28/2015 9.A. • The proposed Subdistrict proposed limiting residential development to market rate rental apartments only, prior to the CCPC meeting, which correlated with the submitted apartment study. Now, the petition proposes market rate residential development of any ownership type, which means the type of residential development could be the same as the already approved+12,000 units proximate to this site. • The proposed Subdistrict would allow residential density of 10 [12 prior to CCPC meeting] dwelling units per acre in a Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) location where additional dwelling units (beyond 4 DU/A) can only be attained when qualifying for a density bonus, but no qualifiers for density bonuses are met. • Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Objective 3 and related Policies limit public expenditures in the CHHA for certain public facilities needed to support new development permitted by the Future Land Use Element. Approval of the proposed density does not limit, but potentially expands, public expenditures in the CHHA. Florida Statutes provide the basis for this CCME Objective and Policies, with specific provisions found in: Section 163.3178(1), providing that local governments limit public expenditures in areas subject to destruction by natural disasters, and Section 163.3177(6)6, requiring local governments to limit public expenditures that subsidize development in coastal high hazard areas. • Based on data and analysis submitted for the supply of existing and potential commercial development and demand within the market area for the subject site, the additional need for the proposed commercial uses contemplated by this amendment to serve the surrounding residential areas cannot be ascertained/has not been demonstrated. Staff found the data and analysis for the subject Growth Management Plan amendment does not support the proposed changes to re-designate the subject site from the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict. The proposed Vincentian Subdistrict is not consistent with Coastal High Hazard Area policies or Future Land Use Element provisions within the Growth Management Plan. Additional staff analysis of this petition is included in the CCPC Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts to Collier County as a result of this amendment, as this is for the Transmittal of this proposed amendment. Petition fees account for staff review time and materials, and for the cost of associated legal advertising/public notice. Fiscal impacts to the County may result from this amendment if it is adopted. The Vincentian Subdistrict proposes residential density of ten (10) dwelling units per acre in a location where only three or four dwelling units per acre of market rate housing are allowed [within the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict(UCF) and the Coastal High Hazard Area(CHHA)]. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality.A majority vote of the Board is needed for adoption of the Resolution. [HFACJ GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of the proposed amendment by the Board for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity will commence the Department's thirty (30) day review process and ultimately return the amendment to the CCPC and the Board for Adoption hearings to be held early in 2015. Packet Page -67- 4/28/2015 9.A. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: The site of petition PL20130001767/CP-2013-10 contains approximately 12.66 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. Wetlands on-site are isolated with no hydrological connection to wetlands or waters off-site. As part of the process of obtaining subsequent development orders (e.g. site development plan), the site will be subject to all applicable local, state and federal environmental protection regulations, including applicable portions of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and the Land Development Code. HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: No significant archaeological or historical sites are recorded for or likely to be present within the Vincentian Subdistrict subject area, and it is unlikely that any such sites will be affected. The site is subject to the requirement for accidental discovery of archaeological or historical sites as required by Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 11.1.3. If found to be present or affected, as part of the process of obtaining subsequent development orders (e.g. site development plans), the site will be subject to all applicable local, State and Federal protection regulations relevant to historical and archeological sites. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the CCPC forward Petition CP-2013-10 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation not to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC was provided with the recommendation not to approve and transmit the GMP Future Land Use Element (FLUE) amendment as proposed by the petitioner. Staff also provided the CCPC with revisions to the applicant's proposed Subdistrict text (for proper code language, format, clarity, etc.) if they chose to recommend transmittal. The CCPC heard CP-2013-10 during two separate hearing dates. During its initial hearing, the applicant's agent presented a revised version of Subdistrict text. That version incorporated land uses, intensity, density and other key Subdistrict provisions summarized as: allowing an entirely residential development, an entirely commercial development, or mixed use (residential and commercial) development; increasing residential density to a maximum of nearly 12 dwelling units per acre (= 360 units); basing residential density upon total site acreage; removing the residential limitation to only allow rental apartments; increasing commercial intensity to a maximum of 250,000 sq. ft. of uses as allowed to the C-1 through C-3 zoning districts; allowing for an automobile service station and other commercial uses outside the C-3 District; and, retaining a minimum of 15%native vegetation on site. During its continued hearing, a different version of Subdistrict text was presented by the applicant's agent. This substantially revised version incorporated changes to: (a) limit the increased residential density to a maximum of 10 dwelling units per acre (= 307 units); (b) base residential density only upon non-commercial acreage; (c) relax the residential limitation to allow any market-rate dwellings, not just rental apartments; (d) limit the increased commercial intensity to a maximum of 250,000 sq. ft. of uses as allowed to the C-1 through C-3 zoning districts, with hotel and ALF conversions reducing this maximum; and, (e) allowing for Packet Page -68- 4/28/2015 9.A. automotive fuel pumps accessory to another, larger commercial facility, and other commercial uses outside the C-3 District. There were a number of public speakers, expressing concerns about impact upon owners of businesses and residences in the area. In particular, speakers addressed the low residential density of existing neighboring developments, and contrasted it with the high residential density proposed in the Vincentian Subdistrict. Incompatibilities were identified and ways to minimize them were discussed. Interconnection was another issue discussed, as access to the commercial development to the southeast would be beneficial, without having to use US 41 for every trip. Emphasis was put on the growing traffic on both US 41 and Southwest Boulevard, and the accompanying traffic problems. Speakers located in the Hitching Post Mobile Home Park addressed the possible collaboration on land uses adjacent to, on and through their recreation/storage area. Speakers were apprehensive of such a wide-open proposal, where no specific plans for development of the site were known or proposed. The CCPC forwarded petition CP-2013-10, with the petitioner's changes, to the Board with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (vote: 4/2), subject to a few clean-up changes to the text. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: Same as to the CCPC —not to transmit petition CP-2013-10, as revised at the CCPC meeting, to the Department of Economic Opportunity. Prepared by: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, and David Weeks, AICP, GMP Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section, Planning and Zoning Department, Growth Management Division Attachments: 1) CP-2013-10 CCPC Staff Report; 2) CP-2013-10 Resolution with Exhibit"A"text and map 3) Application Backup Information (petition only); due to the size of the entire document it is accessible at: http://www.colliergov.net/ftp/AgendaOctl 414/GrowthMgmt/op- PL20130001767 CP-2013-10 Petition Applica.pdf a Packet Page-69- 4/28/2015 9.A. \\bcc.colliergov.net\data\GMD-LDS\CDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2013 Cycles& Small Scale Petitions\2013 Cycle 3-October\2013.3 BCC Transmittal\13-10 Trnsmttl BCC exec summ_DRAFT.docx c Packet Page-70- 4/28/2015 9.A. RESOLUTION NO. 14- 2 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP ANI) MAP SERIES, BY ESTABLISHING THE VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT IN THE URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ONLY, COMMERCIAL ONLY OR MIXED USE PROJECT AT THE FOLLOWING DENSITY/INTENSITY: UP TO 10 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR A MAXIMUM OF 307 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, UP TO 250,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES, A 150 ROOM HOTEL AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF .60 AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF .60. THE COMMERCIAL USES ALLOWED BY RIGHT ARE ALL PERMITTED USES AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-1 GENERAL OFFICE THROUGH C-3 COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICTS IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WITH CONVERSIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND US 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST) IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 31 ±ACRES. [PL20130001767/CP-2013-10] WHEREAS. Collier County, pursuant to Section 1613161, et. seq.. Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WI-IEREAS. the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Petitioner, Robert J. Mulhere FAICP of Hole Montes, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, PA on behalf of Global Properties, LLC, has initiated this amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map Series; and [14-CMP-00931/1 1 291 73%1] 58—Rev. 10/31/14 1 Words underlined are additions;Words struck t ret are deletions *** *** *** ***are a break in text Packet Page-71- 4/28/2015 9.A. WHEREAS, on August 21, 2014 and September 4, 2014, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners, at a public hearing, approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S.;and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty (30) days pursuant to Section 163.31.84,F.S.; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty(180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment. attached hereto as Exhibit "A'' and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote this day of cf.) — , 2014. ATTEST: BOARD OF C UNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER C JNTY ORIDA t I( 7'; B Y. ^•- �' T -r ' D�ut r - TOM HEIv'NING, Chairman Attest as lo- , acl s4inature.only. 7 [14-CMP-0093111129173/'1] 58—Rev. 10/31/14 2 Words underlined are additions; Words atruck through are deletions *** *** *** *** are a break in text Packet Page -72- 4/28/2015 9.A. Approved as to form and legality: t \ Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit"A"—text and maps CP\14-CAMP-0093 1\2 114-CMP-0093 1/1 1 29 1 7311] 58—Rev. 1031/14 3 Words underlined are additions;Words struek-thf 4"are deletions *** *** *** *** are a break in text Packet Page-73- 4/28/2015 9.A. PL20130001767 t,r-Zu i s-i u EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT [Page 10] Policy 1.1: The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict 5. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict 8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict 11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict *** ,.*** **** **** **** **,.* **** **** **** **** **** [Page 26] 12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban - Mixed Use District, PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict, Office and Infil! Commercial Subdistrict, Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict, Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict; and, in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston RoadNeterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict; Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay; and, as allowed by certain FLUE policies. **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** 1 Words underlined are added; words strk-us -sue#are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **** ****) denotes break in text. 28 Oct Version Packet Page-74- 4/28/2015 9.A. PL20130001767 yr-Lu 1,3-11J [Page 46] 17. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict This Subdistrict contains approximately 30.68 acres, is located on the south/west side of Tamiami Trail East (US 41) and is depicted on the Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow for neighborhood, community, and regional commercial development; residential development; and mixed use (commercial and residential) development. The Subdistrict is intended to include commercial uses to serve the emerging residential development in close proximity to this Subdistrict, and to provide employment opportunities for residents in the surrounding area. In order to comply with Policy 1.10 of the Housing Element of the Growth Management Plan, residential development shall be limited to market-rate units so as to avoid the concentration of affordable housing in one location in the County. The property may be developed entirely as commercial, entirely as residential, or as a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The development of this Subdistrict shall comply with the following restrictions, limitations and standards: a. Allowable uses: The maximum intensity of commercial uses shall be limited to those allowed in the C-3 zoning district, both by right and by conditional use, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict. Additionally, the following uses are allowed: 1. Department store (5311), 2. Hotel (7011, hotel only), 3. Dental laboratories (8072), and 4. Nursing and personal care facilities (8051). b. Additional use restrictions and intensity standards: 1. Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250.000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), and one hotel (maximum FAR 0.6 and a maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. 2. Residential development shall be limited to a maximum density of 7.3 units per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the property exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 224 multi-family dwelling units. 3. If the project is developed as mixed use (residential and commercial uses), the residential density allowance is as provided for in Number 2. above, and the commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses, and a 150-room hotel not to exceed 0.6 FAR, and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. Additionally, for every acre of hotel or ALF, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet. 4. A stand-alone automobile service station (i.e. retail fuel sales in conjunction with a convenience store) is prohibited; however, accessory fuel pumps in association with a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility greater than 15.000 square feet of GFA are allowed. 5. A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of 3 acres. The recreational site may include facilities such as a pool, clubhouse, and tennis courts. 2 Words underlined are added; words&truck through are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **** —*") denotes break in text. 28 Oct Version Packet Page -75- 4/28/2015 9.A. PL20130001767 Lt-zuii-1V c. Site Development: 1. Rezoning of this Subdistrict is encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The rezone ordinance shall contain development and design standards to ensure compatibility with internal uses as well as adjacent external uses, and shall include additional restrictions and standards necessary to ensure that uses and hours of operation are compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The subiect site will be developed with a common architectural and landscaping theme, to be submitted with the first Site Development Plan. 3. The unified planned development submitted at time of the first Site Development Plan will reflect, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. 4. Pedestrian connections are encouraged, both with perimeter properties, where feasible, and between internal buildings. 5. At the time of Site Development Plan approval, the required on-site vegetation retention may be satisfied off-site, pursuant to Policy 6.1.1(13) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME) of the Growth Management Plan. At a minimum, 15 percent of the on-site native vegetation must be retained on-site. If the portion of native vegetation satisfied off-site is met by land donation to the County, the specific off-site property shall be taken to the Board of County Commissioners for acceptance. However, a hearing before the Conservation Collier Land Acauisition Advisory Committee will not be required. **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** [Page 141] Urban Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map Gocdlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Livingston RoadNeteran's Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map Coastal High Hazard Area Map Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map 3 Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted. Row of asterisks (**** **** ****) denotes break in text. 28 Oct Version Packet Page -76- ' I; 5D $ 1 ;1 :.1 i5:1 : 1'5'2". $ , T 47 S • l' 48 S ' „..; . • ' r-• ' • IR, ' 1E, •E! , !„, • - q i, _z.7.....ft,,5_1,.,,,,.,' , T 46 S ' c> -- -:-S---- ' T 4:9 S1-1 111'.:"..`11;,°-;;Ii,4:1:7,■',,:il.,-,; i01:4'-il?ti,°,, r0.'i;',1 C) . Ci..11iiilYi-l'-'1~I'i i.g. g!...,- ..7, I ,i,1 , ,,,1 , i ;','1 :,0,L,„,„3!...4 tl .,.,.. .2.r.s.ltrv4g1it q 1 o r71.Nt15-1Vti -ig-- It ;; i 4-,---1 '- ' i"h6111-LiiiiIiIELi,CiLi1- $ $- $ -$,_ $ t --- . :--, IL E; ; t i q Ld; ; i gl .11 i'; i i i g.:ig E Erf ,d,Inc:,. OLIVAtOde 8I -', .°■! . ,°.' '*' .,". .t .,Iii =4 , . ;t6. t''.*!I ! 1! 1 g. gq ''-- ';', "' :."‘ t - t -att. , i t $' ..---0.- - L ic § —1 t'' Eir,§: iilIDL 1 ;',7'L.O't /70° 011110,,,. - .., I r --- ..„. i — 5 0_ 1 ,' Z ; '---' ii• ; c' tS t- __ ' ,,E 7 ° F.: — ; lc' V i ii 4 'Z . 1, t. g 2 1 Cg t- 1 : ' ''f ■!'"4; F'"LI bi'AF E - i:-. !' ., uJ 1 ; ;"1. 1•'-'4!-,,.'1, tl F °: E, if,L P i i.]]: f i ,0, F.f, — ;,'•=1 'E:'.11 gr-i`th' A. g, .t.i, ..' ,. :!.i.? ,..,$ 1, 1 i ''''e''' 1 r--, iffi I E35E ;E -„ii..,..'i E . E ool;ti,-JE UDE -_,. Er F-'1::4, 1 z1 g ..,,, -E,,-1' .,' t E § 1 w ..._.. ti 'ct' $ I s , '- i -.. I 1-: . L, ,' , p4;::';:t 0.4 . 0, 1 Li ',:'''g ; , vri- , 4.krAFi, . 1 i 8 tit' 'ig!iigt,,' g i 1 .,, ,t;,3' ..i.i !IfIiii i ii "f„ #,tt: : '1 6EtI; Ogil;r1 ,!1!„?.1!is!,iSIE,t =4,1,,i. , — s i F E ' A :•=t iv g ..,Z.,%1 4ift P.,• , 1- '' " ip E 1,.:. ]rt g .;.] ,. ,-. 0 fr''R ,,:eqi"a 11.' S!$;'..i"5 1 iF$ .'? ZX'''''■ 1 .__________j izi i "' •'lie - '. - ''`'?F°,1= limn' ffiP,MIME a. ...■ - ,.., ,.,i,.... ‘,......) 1E I.AO..... ,..i ..... CC ■-■,-.-''. K..' ' .:Cr it ) / . , .,-... . , 1 f. i ■ .•, t . ■ -- ; , . ... : — , - ti '' - '- - ' il `1 'di.li' '--- '-• 1 iltiH, ...*' „Thit.,„_41,4 •', ' '§' ' , - ,. ' „:••:-, / .11111M .l:] ] - ' .: ]] . ] - ]7,-,],i.']1;Iii„'l - i - . --.];-. ;1]:•11 II - -- ] ..]; 1,], 1,---- , , ] 0i. . ,,,:,„ ] ,. ]‘ Hi 1.1r,4 I . . , .,.]:,..„,]]],,,,;,],i.,..].,], -t].0,--.]: ] - ,] ]]'] ]-'• - ] . . ,,., . „ i r„, „ , ,,,,,..,-]]]]]...--.,4,',,]..]:„--;,..]: , ...]: ]': ., ., . . . , .. , .,.. - - , . ''' "r",:ekfIltll: 11 4Y:,... . -, : , ': ' :".. ... •,,,.--;,'4L.,'.."..- I"' (L. -:;:'•'I"'•:4141:-71L4.516, --.3,:..':',,,!''''' ,•1_;_,._:._.4 = .-,.i-1IlflL'LIW3L,'4..IL j liL,•,iiL L':ii,,1,.;,f l+.'i::',1 i'L i r,.L j i!1:t,tk,zvi: a:',k;.i.t.;."t'%-\r•''''I t''',t:' 0,Lg:°g- t,;':,A,I,":.',L.I„,,-L,'--'L--:- '-,-..L:..':.-.,-7.L!----.:.-.:-,.4'r.'4L...4.;.L.,'--'!.,.-,,1,',.,„.-L,':',„.--F,-a....•..-_..-..',,:..•:.--:..L'.-''-v-”.\'--:"■Z l:,__'-i--.t'.."i--,-;:"";.;.';,:.‘..,\,;..m._.,..-.;7.-,.-...f4'174..11..N4....‘.t.A,...t,,,.7.,tl.7,Li..,a.i o-/,..i...r.7 A';_'w,'z-k'N'v4-..4,-.*,5 0;-',i if*-/-:%,//,3,.''-,,', ',/-1.,.'.-„1':-,_-L.\,4.,.4„.-4..--.),.,'....'4.1 t.`','",,f•i'1'‘c.'-,'',,•1 A'.--,,.:f"•,,,:,-,-,--2.--.,%t.k-,,.(.-.>-==5,••\,•••;,;;!,,,!(,-,.„4--.-•'.,„1 1 i^..... I 5, 1-';`,,,,,,& ! , -.-,,,,-„,..---,,.--.7417-10mii . . - . , z, • ...i 7 ; iNg:` 21.i--1 :•'_-.:,_.,,,,sirit . --",.- ,, ,...„,r. (, t-..._-----i l'" '''' CM t"c 'l Fiil 1; •!--,:,. •-'.%-.::: ,,,„, ., , . , g4 r, c;:,,S 0,- aft,,,- ,.,..,. ii,... ,.._....11010......-, 7/ lti iNIOP''. t"t99,-' = CC c) • .g Z-'-' r ''',. — ...ir --- c) t- T..1',.. r4t •,- I &".---,'E .i.44, ,i, , -firill' 1 ' ' I— 7 Ei -111 !'"lgl. 4 r-,-, 1 ,--„,---. , ,..___ i3 Lij ce> -Z■Etr"'".'",,',,4' .,--.` NMI ‘'tfl -'- -->i---0 ..„ CO cr)C;1 M i It .1 C° D cl, i.... 1 ' (f) t) = gti si. , t. •t-., ,, = - rr. . „...,,.. , Packet Page s st i s LI, i ' s at 1 -77-; it,t .1. S LS 1. S Zg i S t g i EXHIBIT A PETITION PL2 4/28/2015 9.A. � VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA \'' '.... '‘..." \:>>>\'' ' >7:<<:\\* / / 0 I , i 1 , , ,- Z,-, >> '‘ \\466.11 ■ \ I 1 1-- 'j , '� ` yam ✓ ^7! I ' Y ■ r \�\ \ I i \-\ x i �;\�� Vi y /-\ - ../S \-- /yi l 'sue/)! / N. / N. v G „,---� _ ,/;\\'',,, ,,<:„2\-‘� `III 1 I II II ��'' p 1 � 1 �� 11 ; ij tl \\`'‘,/,,, \\ �°'. -F \\'A LEGEND SCALE \ 1 1 I \`L. SUBDISTRICT PREPARED BY GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION 10Qt3 FT. 2000 FT. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION /PLANNING AND REGULATION DATE 7/2014 FILE CP-2013-10ADWG Packet Page -78- 4/28/2015 9.A. PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE • NOTICE OF MEETING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCES Notice is hereby given that the Collier County•Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on Tuesday,April 28,2015 in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 E.Tamiami Trail,Naples,FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COWER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA,SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND'USE MAP AND MAP SERIES BY ESTABLISHING THE VINCENTIAN MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT IN THE URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ONLY, COMMERCIAL ONLY OR MIXED.USE PROJECT AT THE FOLLOWING DENSITY/INTENSITY: UP TO 7.3 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR A MAXIMUM OF 224 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS,UP TO 250,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES,A 150 ROOM HOTEL,AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY AT A FLOOR AREA RATIO OF 0.6. THE COMMERCIAL USES ALLOWED BY-RIGHT ARE ALL PERMITTED USES AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-3 COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE ZONING DISTRICT,AND THREE PERMITTED USES AND ONE CONDITIONAL USE IN THE C-4 COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WITH CONVERSIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT;AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND U.S.41(TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST)IN SECTION 32,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 30.68*ACRES, [PL20130001767/CP-2013-10] • AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41,, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PUD)ZONING DISTRICT TO • w A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE z KNOWN-AS-THE-VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD,TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 224 } MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS,UP TO 250,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL -J LAND USES,A HOTEL LIMITED TO 150 ROOMS,AND AN ASSISTED LMNG FACILITY(ALF)AT 0.6 FAR. Q THE COMMERCIAL USES ARE SUBJECT TO CONVERSIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF THE PROJECT IS 0 DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE OR IF A HOTEL OR ALF IS CONSTRUCTED_THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ut IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND U.S. 41 IN SECTION w 32,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,CONSISTING OF 30.68+/- a ACRES;PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-37,THE VINCENTIAN PUD;AND BY <t PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL2 01 30001 7 26] z 1r) , NAVIES MANOR LEEY,• Two C9MNUNTV N Y za 2e 27 p fV yrn (s) u Nm E V N000z ws TEENS NEE s PROJECT Q LOCATION , ACRES cd 32 \ 13 K to NNUwnAN c Y[MTMMTN ESTATES All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed •RDINANCES will be made available for inspection at the Zoning Division,Comprehensive Planning Section,2800 N. Horseshoe Dr.,Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.,Monday through Friday. Furthermore the materials will be made 4 available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,fourth floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 03 East Tamiami Trail,Suite#401 Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the Zoning Division,Comprehensive Planning Section.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Tuesday,April 28,2015,will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS-COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA TIM NANCE,CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK By:Teresa Cannon Deputy Clerk(SEAL) No.231121302 April 8.2015 Packet Page-79-