Loading...
Agenda 03/10/2015 Item #11C 3/10/2015 11 .C. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to accept a status report regarding existing and proposed off leash dog parks within the County Parks system. OBJECTIVE: To provide nonintrusive, safe places for residents and visitors to take their dogs. CONSIDERATIONS: An established recreational trend in Parks and Recreation systems throughout the country is to allow dogs on leashes within parks and to create confined, off-leash sections within selected locations. These off-leash areas provide socialization for dogs, socialization for the owners, and to provide an open space where dogs both large and small can exercise. The following is a summary of previous policy direction by the Board regarding the programming of space and access for dogs within County parks: • On December 14, 1999 (agenda item 16C3),the Board directed staff to establish a gated off leash dog park within Veterans Park,which thereafter became known as"Rover Run". • On September 27, 2011 (agenda item l0B), the Board adopted a master plan for future parks development that identified two additional future off leash dog park sites (Manatee Community Park and Big Corkscrew Island Regional Park). • On May 14, 2013 (agenda item 17H),the Board adopted ordinance 2013-35 allowing dogs on leashes within most neighborhood, community and regional parks. As part of this action, the Board directed staff to post signage and other information instructing owners to clean up after their pets. Subsequent to the adoption of Ordinance 2013-35 nearly two years ago, staff has received minimal complaints and several "thank-your" in response to the change in policy. Maintenance staff has identified specific areas where dog owners have not cleaned up after their pets. These locations generally have less staff presence. Accordingly, staff is considering the use of various corrective measures to ensure owners follow through with the requirements of the ordinance. The primary purpose of this executive summary is to focus on two topics: 1. To address issues regarding sound emanating from the Rover Run park; and 2. To examine the prospect of locating an off-leash dog park within existing County property on Whitaker Road in East Naples. ROVER RUN This facility has a large number of users. Over the years, some neighbors living within the Stonebridge Community have identified a noise issue related to barking that is heard from the dog park. Recently the Parks and Recreation Division contracted with ESA to conduct a Noise Study focus on the issues related to Rover Run and that study is attached. The test was conducted at Rover Run over the weekend of January 31s` and the primary conclusions and recommendations of the study reveal the following: • Sound levels resulting from the operation of the Rover Run dog park do not appear to cause an overall increase in the community noise levels experienced by the Stonebridge Community. Packet Page-171- 3/10/2015 11 .C. • The relocation of Rover Run to a more northern location in the park would result in a 5-6 db(A) reduction in noise levels resulting from barking dogs, which would be perceptible to the adjacent residences within the Stonebridge Community. • If Rover Run were to remain in its current location, a noise barrier of 21 feet in height, 783 feet in length at an estimated cost of$660,809 would be required to provide similar noise level reductions. • Some reduction in noise could be gained by further adding acoustic fencing around the entire small dog area to further minimize the interaction between the large and small dogs. With regard to relocating Rover Run to another location within the park, staff had previously evaluated the option to move the dog park to the volleyball area at an estimated cost of at least$100,000.However, this would result in a considerably smaller foot print (approximately one third of the size of the current site)for the re-located dog park. Accordingly, staff does not recommend this action. ESA's ultimate recommendation is that the most cost effective method would be to keep Rover Run in its current location and revise the gates for big dogs and small dogs so that they have limited interaction. The close proximity of the large and small dog entrances during the study seemed to result in the most barking from the animals.Furthermore,the ESA report recommends if Rover Run is relocated,that the current space be left vacant and not replaced with another activity or use that may cause a similar level of annoyance to the adjacent residences. WHITAKER ROAD On February 10, 2015, the Board of County Commissioners was presented with a public petition to develop a dog park on land within the Growth Management Department roadway inventory on the corner of Whitaker Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The petitioners have gained signatures from others who are interested in the concept of a dog park at that location. In addition,the petitioners indicate that MHK Architecture and Planning has agreed to donate the conceptual plans for the site once a site is selected. Also, they have indicated that they would be willing to raise funds for the construction of the park. Currently, it is estimated that developing the Whitaker site into a dog park would cost approximately $223,432. Please consider the following estimated operational costs associated with the off-leash park at Whitaker Road: Elements FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Personnel Costs $25,000 $25,500 $26,010 $26,530 $27,060 Operating and Maintenance $30,000 $30,600 $31,212 $31.836 $32,472 Capital Outlay $223,432 N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Operating Costs $278,432 N/A N/A N/A N/A Minus Cost Savings N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Minus New Revenues N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Net Operating Effect $278,432 $56,100 $57,222 $58,366 $59,532 New Personnel (FTE) .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 Packet Page-172- 3/10/2015 11 .C. Staff is still in the process of identifying all costs and issues associated with the Parks Division developing and maintaining this property as a dog park. While this site may have potential, there are several issues that would have to be worked through in order to place the park within the available right of way, including the placement of required buffers, setbacks,the use and placement of chain link fencing and the provision of water,shade and parking within the site. As an alternative, staff has been working with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board on the concept of building a dog park within Golden Gate Community Park. Though there may be some limitations with this site as well, it would appear to have sufficient space,water, shade and parking available for this use. The following is a summary of future year operating costs associated with Golden Gate Park site: Elements FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Personnel Costs $12,500 $12,750 $13.005 $13,265 $13,530 Operating and Maintenance $15,000 $15,300 $15,606 $15,918 $16,236 Capital Outlay $93,000 Total Operating Costs $120,500 $28,050 $28,611 $29,813 $29.766 Minus Cost Savings N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Minus New Revenues N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Net Operating Effect $120,500 $28,050 $28,611 $29,813 $29,766 New Personnel (FTE) .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 Given these considerations, staff believes that the Golden Gate Park is a better location to pursue at this time, should the Board so desire. Should the Board direct staff to pursue development of a dog park at either site, staff would complete the analysis and bring a follow up recommendation back to the Board for final action. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval.—CMG FISCAL IMPACT: The recommended improvements to the current Rover Run site are estimated to cost between $12-14,000. Annual operating costs for the Whittaker Road site are summarized in the table above. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Community and Regional Parks are counted within the AUIR. Dog parks developed outside of the Community and Regional Parks would increase lands associated with these parks and count toward additional level of service. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Direct staff to leave Rover Run in its current location and complete the acoustic fencing to further separate the small and large dogs at the park. 2. Provide direction on pursuing the development of the Whitaker Road or Golden Gate Community Park as a site for a future off-leash dog park. Packet Page-173- 3/10/2015 11 .C. 3. Continue to pursue the development of other future off leash dog parks in accordance with the current Parks Master plan. Prepared By:Barry Williams,Director,Parks and Recreation Attachments: Rover Run Noise Study Technical Memo Packet Page-174- 3/10/2015 11 .C. COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 11.11.C. Item Summary: Recommendation to accept a status report regarding existing and proposed off-leash dog parks within the County Parks system. (Barry Williams, Parks and Recreation Division Director) Meeting Date: 3/10/2015 Prepared By Name: BetancurNatali Title: Operations Analyst,Beach&Water 2/27/2015 3:07:38 PM Submitted by Title: Director-Parks&Recreation,Parks &Recreation Name: WilliamsBarry 2/27/2015 3:07:39 PM Approved By Name: MottToni Title: Manager-Property Acquisition&Const M,Facilities Management Date: 3/2/2015 12:46:19 PM Name: WilliamsBarry Title: Division Director-Parks &Recreation,Parks &Recreation Date: 3/2/2015 2:40:39 PM Name: AlonsoHailey Title: Operations Analyst,Public Services Department Date: 3/3/2015 9:06:55 AM Name: BetancurNatali Title: Operations Analyst,Beach&Water Date: 3/3/2015 9:12:30 AM Packet Page-175- 3/10/2015 11 .C. Name: TownsendAmanda Title: Division Director-Operations Support,Public Services Department Date: 3/3/2015 9:49:18 AM Name: GreeneColleen Title: Assistant County Attorney,CAO General Services Date: 3/4/2015 11:01:51 AM Name: CarnellSteve Title: Department Head-Public Services,Public Services Department Date: 3/4/2015 12:57:20 PM Name: GreeneColleen Title: Assistant County Attorney, CAO General Services Date: 3/4/2015 2:27:23 PM Name: IsacksonMark Title: Division Director-Corp Fin&Mgmt Svc,Office of Management&Budget Date: 3/4/2015 2:37:52 PM Name: KlatzkowJeff Title: County Attorney, Date: 3/4/2015 3:56:42 PM Name: OchsLeo Title: County Manager, County Managers Office Date: 3/4/2015 4:11:29 PM Packet Page-176- 3/10/2015 11 .C. Final VETERANS COMMUNITY PARK - ROVER RUN Noise Study Technical Memorandum Prepared for March 3, 2015 Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Packet Page-177- 3/10/2015 11.C. Final VETERANS COMMUNITY PARK - ROVER RUN Noise Study Technical Memorandum Prepared for March 3, 2015 Collier County Parks and Recreation Department 15000 Livingston Road Naples, FL 34109 4350 West Cypress Street Suite 950 Tampa,FL 33607 813.207.7200 www.esassoc.com Los Angeles Oakland Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Santa Cruz Seattle Woodland Hills D140348.00 Packet Page-178- 3/10/2015 11.C. OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions.ESA is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry,a Climate Leader,and founding reporter for the Climate Registry.ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S.Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change(BC3).Internally,ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations.This document was produced using recycled paper. Packet Page-179- 3/10/2015 11.C. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Sound Level Monitoring 2 2.1 Methodology 2 2.2 Monitoring Results 4 3. Predictive Computer Modeling 8 3.1 Methodology 8 3.2 Modeling Results 9 3.3 Abatement Analysis 9 3.4 Effective and Cost Efficient Noise Reduction Measures 10 4. Conclusions and Recommendations 12 List of Tables Table Page 2.1 Observed Number of Dogs Using Rover Run 4 2.2 Summary of Rover Run Sound Level Monitoring 4 2.3 Comparison of Select Intervals 6 2.4 Typical Noise Levels 7 3.1 Maximum Predicted Sound Levels 9 List of Figures Figure Follows 2.1 Project and Monitoring Location Map Page 2 3.1 Predicted Sound Levels with Rover Run at Current Location Page 9 3.2 Predicted Sound Levels with Rover Run Relocation Figure 3.1 3.3 Predicted Noise Contours with Rover Run at Current Location Figure 3.2 3.4 Predicted Noise Contours with Rover Run Relocation Figure 3.3 3.5 Predicted Sound Levels with 21-Foot Noise Barrier Page 11 List of Appendices Appendix A: Additional Dog Count Survey Data Appendix B: Measured Sound Levels and Observation Sheets Appendix C: Noise Barrier Cost Estimate and Sketch Veterans Community Park—Rover Run I ESA/Project No.D140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page-180- 3/10/2015 11 .C. SECTION 1 Introduction A concern has been raised by adjacent homeowners in the Stonebridge Country Club in Naples, Florida resulting from noise emanating from barking dogs utilizing the"Rover Run" dog park located within the Veterans Community Park. The park is located at 1895 Veterans Park Drive, Naples, FL 34109. Rover Run is located in the southeast corner of Veterans Community Park, with the Stonebridge County Club located south of Veterans Community Park. In response to these concerns,ESA has been retained by the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department to conduct a noise study consisting of sound level monitoring and computer modeling. The goal of the study is to determine the sound levels that result from barking dogs within Rover Run, at the adjacent residences and at a potential relocation site for Rover Run;to predict(using a computer model)the potential sound levels at the adjacent residences in question that may result from the relocation of Rover Run to another area within Veterans Community Park, and finally;to determine if noise abatement would provide a meaningful amount of sound level reduction to those residences in question. It should be noted that Section 54-87 of Article IV(Noise)of the Collier County Code of Ordinances specifically exempts"Authorized School,Park or Playground activities....."from the noise ordinance. As such, it is not the intent of this study and report to determine if a standard or criteria has been exceeded and/or violated by the operation of the Rover Run Dog Park. Noise is defined as unwanted sound. Sound is the sensation produced by auditory organs in humans or animals resulting from the transmission of vibrations through the air or another medium. Sound is measured in decibels (dB), a unit that denotes the ratio between two quantities that are proportional to power. As such, a decibel is not an amount like a weight or a distance, but a difference between pressures. A common misconception is that dB values can be added using simple arithmetic, which is not the case. For instance, if you have two sound sources of 50 dB each and combine them,the resultant sound level is 53 dB,not 100 dB. Unless otherwise indicated,all measured and modeled sound levels in this section are expressed as dB on the A-weighted scale, or dB(A). A-weighting accounts for the perception of the human ear with regards to loudness, as it is less sensitive to very high and very low frequencies. Veterans Community Park—Rover Run I ESA/Project No.D140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page-181- 3/10/2015 11 .C. SECTION 2 Sound Level Monitoring 2.1 Methodology The first part of ESA's approach was to conduct simultaneous sound level monitoring at four locations in and around the Rover Run Dog Park. The monitoring was conducted on Saturday January 31, 2015 from 8:40AM until 11:40AM. The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department staff worked with the effected homeowners to schedule the monitoring during a time that was thought by the homeowners as the optimum period to evaluate the noise from Rover Run. The Department had rescheduled the time from its original schedule in summer 2014,to October 2014,December 2014, and finally at the arrived date of January 31, 2015 in order to accommodate the homeowners' perceptions of when the noise was at its peak. Staff did receive feedback that even after rescheduling on multiple occasions, a representative of the homeowners indicated that the January 31,2015 was not a representative date to monitor the noise due to the ambient air temperature. The low temperature that day was 52 degrees Fahrenheit and the high was 77 degrees Fahrenheit. Figure 2.1 provides the location of Veterans Community Park and Rover Run as well as the four monitoring locations,which are described below. • Site 1: Located north of Rover Run, adjacent(to the west)of the sand volleyball court. This location represents a potential relocation area for Rover Run. • Site 2: Outside the screened patio/lanai of the residence located at 1845 Pondside Lane in the Stonebridge Country Club. • Site 3: At Rover Run Dog Park, approximately 8 feet outside the fence(to eliminate dogs and their owners interfering with equipment). • Site 4: Outside the screened patio/lanai of the residence located at 1861 Pondside Lane in the Stonebridge Country Club. The monitoring equipment used consisted of two(2)Larson-Davis Model 720 Sound Level Meters(SLM) and two (2)Larson Davis Model 820 SLMs. The Model 720 SLMs were calibrated before and after the measurement period with a Larson Davis Model CAL150 Sound Level Calibrator, and the Model 820 SLMs were calibrated before and after the measurement periods with a Larson Davis Model CAL200 Sound Level Calibrator. The SLMs were mounted on a tripod with the microphone located approximately 5 feet above ground,which corresponds to the average height of the human ear. Meteorological conditions, including temperature,relative Veterans Community Park—Rover Run 2 ESA/Project No D140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page-182- 3/10/2015 11 .C. Pry - - . . f ri 411. ..1 , 1 a... NM eommunity , ' N40112110 t s rw !F. @q . - A 0 Stonebridge eountry 0 100 200 400 Feet Veterans Community Park Large Dog Area - s Monitoring Sites —7,—/Small Dog Area «n. lb°:2 [ ap�r� '� ." z (fir � a '�3, n co Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study.D140348.00 Figure 2.1 Project and Monitoring Location Map Packet Page-183- 3/10/2015 11.C. humidity and wind speed and direction were observed and recorded before and after the monitoring period. The time of day on each SLM was synchronized to allow for a direct comparison of the results for each of the one-minute intervals obtained. The SLM at each monitoring site was staffed by an individual tasked with making observations and taking notes of dominant sound sources,unusual events, etc. Seven metrics/descriptors of the acoustical environment were obtained at one-minute intervals during the entire three hour measurement period, described below: • Leg=the equivalent steady state sound level over a period of time that contains the same acoustic energy as a fluctuating level during the same time period. Equivalent to the total sound energy over a period of time. • LMIN=the minimum recorded sound level during the measurement period • LMAx=the maximum recorded sound level during the measurement period • L01 =the sound level exceeded 1%of the time during the measurement period • L10=the sound level exceeded 10%of the time during the measurement period • L50=the sound level exceeded 50%of the time during the measurement period • L99=the sound level exceeded 99%of the time during the measurement period. Generally accepted as the"background" sound level. Each of the metrics described above were obtained in one-minute intervals for the duration of the three hour monitoring period. In doing so, intervals where extraneous sound sources other than barking dogs occurred(such as aircraft over flights, golf course activity, dog park gates opening/closing, etc.)could be removed from the data that were used as part of this study as they were often louder than and are not related to the barking dogs within Rover Run. When viewing the results of the sound level monitoring, it should be noted that the SLM's do not "discriminate"or only measure certain sounds. All activity in the area of the SLM will be measured and recorded,whether it is desired or not. This may include birds chirping, motor vehicle traffic, leaves rustling with the wind, etc. in addition to those extraneous sources noted above. In the case of Site 3 within Rover Run,one source that was consistently noted was the opening and closing of the gates that provide access to each of the dog park areas(there are two— one for"big"dogs and one for"little" dogs, separated by a chain link fence). Each entrance has two gates. To obtain a general idea on number of dogs utilizing Rover Run, casual observations were made by the individual attending the SLM at Site 3 (at Rover Run). Table 2.1 provides an estimate of the number of dogs within both the"little" and"big"dog parks at the time noted in the column on the left. For comparative purposes, additional dog counts were conducted on the two following Saturdays (February 7 and February 14, 2015)between the hours of 8:00AM and 12:00PM. Those data are provided in Appendix A. Veterans Community Park—Rover Run 3 ESA/Project No.D140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page-184- 3/10/2015 11 .C. TABLE 2.1 OBSERVED NUMBER OF DOGS USING ROVER RUN NUMBER OF DOGS OBSERVED TIME "LITTLE"DOG PARK "BIG"DOG PARK 9:00AM 6 10 9:02AM 11 11 9:08AM N/A* 12 9:30AM 5 11 9:38AM 4 N/A 9:45AM 6 11 9:51 AM/9:52AM 9 12 10:08AM 8 N/A 10:15AM N/A 14 10:27AM 12 N/A 10:46AM 12 N/A 10:56AM 7 N/A 10:59AM N/A 13 11:08AM 2 N/A 11:10AM N/A 12 11:14AM 3 N/A 11:16AM N/A 10 11:30AM 2 6 11:40AM 2 5 AVERAGE 6.3 10.6 Source: ESA,2015 N/A Indicates that a count of the number of dogs was not obtained at the time indicated. 2.2 Monitoring Results A summary of the results of the sound level monitoring at the four locations is provided in Table 2.2 below and is inclusive of all one-minute intervals obtained,regardless of the presence of extraneous or unusual sources. A full list of the measured sound levels at all locations, including the observation sheets from each location are provided in Appendix B. TABLE 2.2 SUMMARY OF ROVER RUN SOUND LEVEL MONITORING Sound Level dB(A) SITE# LEO Lmax Lmin Lot L10 140 L99 Minimum 42.7 44.8 41.5 44.0 43.6 42.6 41.5 1 Maximum 61.2 79.4 47.8 76.3 58.1 52.3 48.0 Minimum 45.6 46.7 44.0 46.7 46.7 45.0 44.0 2 Maximum 83.5 97.1 55.4 96.4 87.3 73.5 55.4 Minimum 43.1 46.0 40.5 46.0 44.8 42.6 40.5 3 Maximum 61.5 73.1 47.4 72.0 64.9 60.0 47.4 Minimum 45.8 47.3 44.5 47.3 46.8 45.5 44.5 4 Maximum 70.4 88.3 49.1 85.7 72.4 52.3 49.1 Minimum 42.7 44.8 40.5 44.0 43.6 42.6 40.5 OVERALL Maximum 83.5 97.1 55.4 96.4 87.3 73.5 55.4 Source: ESA,2015 Veterans Community Park-Rover Run 4 ESA/Project No.D140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page-185- 3/10/2015 11 .C. It should be noted that at Site 2,there are several outliers in the data that cannot be accounted for. As shown in the full list of measured levels in Appendix A, an Lmax level of 97.1 dB(A)was recorded at approximately 10:34AM. However,the Lmax level recorded at Site 3 (at Rover Run) was 57.9 dB(A). While dog barks were observed during that interval,the intensity was not enough to result in an Lmax level of 97.1 dB(A)at Site 2, especially in light of the recorded Lmax level of 57.9 dB(A)at Site 3,which is much closer to the source(i.e.,barking dogs). If the Lmax level of 97.1 dB(A)recorded at Site 2 was directly attributable to barking dogs within Rover Run, the corresponding Lmax level recorded at Site 3 would have been higher since the SLM was much closer to the source. Similar events were recorded at 9:48AM, 9:49AM, 9:57AM, 10:09AM, 10:25AM and 11:01AM. It is assumed and probable that strong wind gusts contributed to the high Lmax levels. Additionally,there were several intervals between 9:30AM and 10:54AM where a wind gust caused the windscreen on the microphone to come off, and its' subsequent replacement by the observer at Site 2 caused a spike in the measured levels that can be seen in the full list of measured levels in Appendix B. These intervals were eliminated from further consideration as part of this study. As previously mentioned, a SLM was also placed at Site 1 near the sand volleyball court. This location has been determined as a possible relocation site for the Rover Run dog park. The sound levels recorded at Site 1 are consistent with what is to be expected given the activity in the area at the time. To the north of Site 1,there are basketball and tennis courts that were utilized during the monitoring period, in addition to motor vehicle traffic in the parking lot to the north. There is also a roller hockey rink immediately to the east and a playground to the southeast. Based on the notes from the observer located at Site 1, it does not appear that barking dogs within Rover Run were audible, possibly due to the presence of other more dominant sound sources in the vicinity. To further reduce the data to meaningful events,the observation sheets were reviewed in detail to isolate the one minute intervals where barking dogs were observed at Site 3 while no other unusual events occurred at the residential monitoring locations that would not allow for a direct comparison of the results. Table 2.3 provides a comparison of those select interval data. For the purpose of this exercise, data was only compared between Sites 2, 3 and 4; as Site 3 is within Rover Run and Sites 2 and 4 are adjacent to the residences in question within Stonebridge County Club. Veterans Community Park—Rover Runt ESA/Project No.D140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page-186- 3/10/2015 11 .C. TABLE 2.3 COMPARISON OF SELECT INTERVALS Interval Measured Sound Level-dB(A) Begin Time SITE# LEO Lmax Lmin L01 L10 L50 L99 2 49.3 55.3 46.6 55.0 51.6 48.2 46.6 9:06AM 3 52.7 61.7 44.9 61.0 57.2 48.9 45.0 4 47.8 50.4 46.3 50.4 49.2 47.5 46.3 2 47.8 50.2 46.1 50.2 49.3 47.4 46.1 9:08AM 3 56.9 65.9 43.4 64.8 60.7 55.0 43.4 4 47.5 49.9 45.6 49.8 48.7 47.3 45.6 2 48.1 51.7 46.1 51.5 49.9 47.5 46.1 9:10AM 3 51.0 62.5 44.6 61.6 52.6 46.3 44.6 4 47.6 50.1 46.3 49.9 48.7 47.3 46.3 2 48.0 50.4 46.6 49.9 48.9 47.7 46.6 9:11 AM 3 53.2 62.2 45.0 60.0 56.7 51.3 45.1 4 48.5 50.6 47.2 50.6 49.7 48.4 47.2 2 48.4 53.4 46.4 53.0 50.3 47.8 46.4 9:13AM 3 51.1 62.0 45.4 58.8 55.5 47.0 45.4 4 48.1 50.1 46.3 49.9 49.3 48.1 46.3 2 49.4 55.3 47.0 54.8 51.9 48.4 47.0 9:19AM 3 61.5 71.4 44.1 69.4 64.9 60.0 44.1 4 49.2 53.9 46.3 53.8 51.9 48.3 46.3 2 49.1 52.5 47.0 52.5 50.9 48.6 47.0 9:45AM 3 52.6 59.5 44.6 58.8 57.0 50.1 45.0 4 46.9 48.4 46.0 48.4 47.8 46.7 46.0 2 48.1 53.6 45.8 53.2 50.6 47.2 45.8 10:24AM 3 56.7 65.4 46.0 64.7 60.8 53.1 46.4 4 46.6 49.3 45.5 49.2 47.7 46.5 45.5 MINIMUM 47.5 49.9 43.4 49.8 48.7 46.3 43.4 MAXIMUM 61.5 71.4 47.2 69.4 64.9 60.0 47.2 Source: ESA,2015 As previously stated,the Lmax level is the maximum sound level recorded during the given monitoring period-in this case each respective one-minute interval. Since the data above are representative of those in which unusual events have been removed, direct comparisons were made. Additionally,the L99 level (the level that is exceeded 99%of the time during a given monitoring period)can generally be considered the"background" level in absence of any unusual or extraneous sources. Even though the L.level is instantaneous and the L99 level is representative of the entire one-minute interval, for the purpose of this exercise, it is assumed that the difference in the Lmax and L99 levels is attributable to barking dogs within Rover Run, since the data above represent intervals where no unusual sound sources were observed. Looking at the 9:06AM interval data, an Lmax level of 61.7 dB(A)was recorded at Site 3 within Rover Run. The corresponding Lmax levels for Sites 2 and 4(residential locations)are 55.3 and 50.4 dB(A),respectively. The L99 levels for Sites 2 and 4 are 46.6 and 46.3 dB(A), respectively, which corresponds to differences ranging from 4.1 to 8.7 dB(A)when compared to the Lmax levels. For reference,the human ear typically cannot perceive sound level changes less than 3 dB, even though a 3 dB change represents a 50%increase or decrease in the amount of acoustic energy. A 4-5 dB difference is considered"readily perceptible", and a 10 dB increase(or decrease)is a doubling(or halving) of the amount of acoustic energy. Veterans Community Park-Rover Run 6 ESA/Project No.0140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page-187- 3/10/2015 11.C. Performing the same exercise for the remaining intervals listed in Table 2.3 shows that the difference between the L,,,a„and L99 levels ranges from 2.4 to 8.3 dB(A). The highest Lmax levels recorded at Sites 2 and 4 were 55.3 and 53.9 dB(A),respectively. While the difference in the levels on the higher end, if presumed attributable to barking dogs within Rover Run,may still cause a certain degree of annoyance(depending on the individual due to the subjective nature of sound),these levels are not considered unusual and can be expected during daytime hours in a suburban setting such as this. Finally, in looking at the Leq levels from Table 2.3,they range from 47.5 to 49.4 dB(A). As previously defined,the Leq level can be interpreted as the total amount of sound energy during a given period of time(in this case,the one-minute intervals). These Leq values are consistent with what can be expected during daytime hours in a suburban setting such as this. This is not to say that the sounds of the barking dogs is not perceptible at the residences,but from the data evaluated above it does not appear to be related to an increase in the overall community sound levels, as the frequency and duration of the barking dogs is not enough to cause an overall increase in community levels. True,the barking from the dogs is audible,but it is instantaneous in nature and over longer periods of time is not significant enough to generate increases in the overall community sound levels. Table 2.4 provides a list of common noise levels for comparative purposes. TABLE 2.4 TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS COMMON OUTDOOR NOISE LEVEL COMMON INDOOR ACTIVITIES dB(A) ACTIVITIES Rock Band Jet Fly-over at 1000 ft ---110--- Gas Lawn Mower at 3 ft ---100--- Diesel Truck at 50 ft, at 50 mph ---90--- Food Blender at 1 m (3 ft) Garbage Disposal at 1 m (3 ft) Noise Urban Area (Daytime) ---80--- Gas Lawn Mower at 100 ft Vacuum Cleaner at 10 ft Commercial Area ---70--- Normal Speech at 3 ft Heavy Traffic at 300 ft ---60--- Large Business Office Quiet Urban Daytime Dishwasher Next Room ---50--- Quiet Urban Nighttime Theater, Large Conference Room Quiet Suburban Nighttime ---40--- (Background) Library Quiet Rural Nighttime ---30--- Bedroom at Night, Concert Hall (Background) ---20--- ---10- - Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing ---0--- Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing Source: California Dept.of Transportation Technical Noise Supplement,Oct.1998,Page 18. Veterans Community Park—Rover Run 7 ESA/Project No.D140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page-188- 3/10/2015 11.C. SECTION 3 Predictive Computer Modeling 3.1 Methodology The final aspect of our approach was to conduct computer modeling using the sound levels measured at Site 3 (closest to the barking dogs within Rover Run). As previously stated,the one minute intervals that were influenced by activities other than barking dogs were not included in this portion of the study. Noise modeling was performed using the SoundPLAN Essential model(SoundPLAN)to estimate the maximum noise levels that would be generated from dogs barking at the two identified single- family residences within Stonebridge Country Club. The use of SoundPLAN allows for noise levels from a source to be estimated at specific receptor locations based on the sound power level of the noise source and the distance of the propagation path between the noise source and receptor. Additionally, SoundPlan also allows for certain environmental factors that are specific to the project area that could affect sound transmission, such as ground elevation,presence of existing walls,vegetation, ground types (e.g.,hard or soft surfaces), and on-site structures,to be accounted for in the noise level predictions at the receptors. For the purpose of this analysis,noise levels generated from barking dogs were measured at the Rover Run dog park within Veterans Community Park over a period of three hours. To provide a conservative(worst-case)assessment,the instantaneous maximum(i.e.,L,,,a.)noise level of 71.4 dB(A)recorded during the monitoring period was used as a reference noise level in SoundPLAN to determine the noise exposure at the two identified residences.The maximum noise level of 71.4 dB(A)that was measured during the monitoring period at 9:19AM and at an average distance of approximately 150 feet from the SLM was converted to a sound power level of 115.6 dB(A)using a directivity factor of 1,which applies to a noise source that is able to radiate acoustical energy in all directions(e.g.,barking dogs). The sound power level was then used as input to SoundPLAN for the dog park, which was modeled as an area noise source at both its current and future(i.e.,relocated)locations.Receiver points were placed at the two residential structures of concern to determine the resulting noise levels at these receptors. Additionally, an approximately seven-foot earth berm running adjacent to the existing dog park site to the south was set up in the noise model to account for the noise attenuation that would be achieved by this existing feature. Furthermore, an existing pond located further south of the current dog park was also accounted for in the noise modeling whereby the entire pond was assigned a ground factor of 1,which represents the water feature as an acoustically hard surface. Veterans Community Park—Rover Run 8 ESA/Project No.D140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page-189- 3/10/2015 11 .C. 3.2 Modeling Results The results of the SoundPlan modeling are presented in Table 3.1 and depicted on Figures 3.1 and 3.2. As shown,the relocation of Rover Run to the north would provide an approximate reduction of 5.0 to 6.5 dB(A), a difference that would be readily perceptible at the residences to the south. It should be noted that these results can be considered a conservative worst-case approach since the entire dog park was modeled as an"area source"with the calculated sound power level being emitted over the entire dog park area,vs. a"point source" in which the sound power is emitted from a single, discreet location within Rover Run. TABLE 3.1 MAXIMUM PREDICTED SOUND LEVELS Rover Run at Current Rover Run Moved to Site Location Alternative Location Difference 2 56.1 dB(A) 51.1 dB(A) 5.0 dB(A) 4 57.6 dB(A) 51.1 dB(A) 6.5 dB(A) Source: ESA,2015 Furthermore,when compared to the measured L99 levels(generally considered"background" levels) at Sites 2 and 4,the predicted sound levels with the dog park relocated to the north would be essentially the same. That's not to indicate that barking dogs would be 100% inaudible at the residential locations if the dog park were relocated,but rather that they would not result in an overall increase in the background or community noise levels in the area. An additional level of analysis was performed using the SoundPlan model and is presented on Figures 3.3 and 3.4. These figures depict the noise contours, or areas of noise exposure as it radiates in all directions from the area source that is Rover Run. Figure 3.3 shows this exposure with Rover Run at its current location, and Figure 3.4 provides the exposure with the relocation of Rover Run as previously discussed. The location of the residences in question(Sites 2 and 4)are shown on the figures for reference. 3.3 Abatement Analysis As a supplement to the analysis presented above, SoundPlan was also used to determine what, if any,the acoustical benefits would be to providing a noise barrier along the south side of Veterans Community Park. For the purpose of this evaluation,a sound level reduction goal of 5 dB(A) was desired since anything less would not provide a meaningful reduction in sound levels. Additionally,this exercise was only performed with Rover Run at its current location. Noise barriers (and other similar attenuation devices)typically only perform well when they are either close to the source or close to the receptor,not somewhere in the middle with distance between the two. Based on the analysis conducted using SoundPlan, it would take a noise barrier(or combination of an earth berm/noise barrier)21 feet tall at a length of 783 feet to provide a 5 dB(A)reduction at both residences resulting from noise generated by Rover Run(and not inclusive of other sources). Veterans Community Park—Rover Run 9 ESA/Project No.D140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page-190- 3/1 0/2!0,7,1;5i. 11.C. a it J 1]! @ E � aD Z3 t 4 _ & Cc 2 aO o. re x a a Z. 2 ° a oN: o O N yz w Q) ti E W y ._ ,k • , tD ti emu- , III i . Y = `.4 .. ICJ ,l Lim. I rat- - " 1, ; • :.t, a tiff .sk�a �..+a ° ' FRS LPL Packet Page-191- 3/10/2o N-015 O 11 .0. C m�j. ° d ;R 7 N V ❑0 j N ,.LL dc2 9 N Z N > O O riP C C 2 Ce Y d i . X4`1 e. A. " - E o v ltl bd v x t., d d ¢ ao m 3. o 7 ti A" . bM , . ar 9 1 ® ..tee { v. xY , , i ' ,,, 1 !,.- -, 1 I 111 i. tix ,. f', tai 1,' _ t. Ote 4AA�+Y a f ort„ l 0,7,„4.7i.,,,,.... Packet Page-192- 3/10/2013 5 11 .C. o .t 0 E rno(V o _1 a� U) w o _ U 3 C1 E z a U CO - r cis 0 ''•,` 0 - __J -0 cc lq./ C) CV LC) CO . tf� OM"Cr) °'" CO -. N m C') d"�hd' If) If) If) COCOCOCOtiN- N- 00070 N c '''''I ° V II a r r r ,1 i" r r - r I i r I I A �' a a� V CANtf) W r '4t1` 0C'') COO) NCf) N-' E C'�) ct 41P .vs- 1.4c) Cf) If) co CO co co‘ts- P�- N- O Cl, Q CO (o C7 co ,cam. O x;4'x�' #' 4` sup �� x t its�t,T p,r�' Y� 1�,�5^ � r �" � .5 M ,5,:4 fi, ' .r.d ,; ' 44 µt T -' c,.� et t i,r si .yea ,, 4. ' 7 1 � 3.A'`F 1� � i - e'er h f t',"k .' M§'r l ea x � f'.: f .T'iF `r' et { _ i k F€ °f } ri 1-2 '�, ,,f : f -� r it' a � -�°'� t 3 d ik f� - � � .�'� C 1. ,%Y�, 5 9 r c.aAF R - �$ �' � 8 �� � .,x?� ``€`! �4 {F'i� x- .7a���` `�`Y aa^� ��€'°r.r�^`y °� �'+���; tA^' ' a 1 5 r 1 s J€' T L £ T ;Ppk�'�'X�a'kr� ,H�'°fi „� $.N "� .t d t .3.1 t F Lh ., t� b. r r .. ' s3'i�#',p.� ,r2}'.rz"''s�y. �. 1. F t`tt �u5" "";, Y � 7`3 P T � tk d Packet Page -193- 3/10/2015 11 .C. o<. C 4--Z-- OE md; i."1- , � o o,g_° O G C 0 3 O O Hi O J `.�- OCV111OOr— crNsCD 7000DNtC) CD — r' a 2 cn o Ca M �td' erul11) LC) CO CO CDC Ns Ns .'000O CD x J C.3 C 0) NIC) CO - Cf N.- 0C') CDC) N Ill OD N .� C) d' d' ' U) 0() CO CD CO CO Imo- Imo.ti c 0 0 0D M O T „, �;Y E W pia CO O m, ,,.!:?.,. ..._1 „:„_:,.... : _:‘,........., v... C) TT irte _ .. S .7. t ': O s a r Y :� ICJ PP, ,: •. t t;:... 7 e :, • b4 c �' _..... Y ' ,:,s °a r 4c ' ,fit • Packet Page-194- 3/10/2015 11 .C. The total estimated cost to construct the barrier is $660,809, including materials and labor. The location of the evaluated noise barrier is shown on Figure 3.5. A breakdown of the cost estimate and a sketch are provided in Appendix C. When compared to the relocation of Rover Run, a noise barrier, or combination of an earth berm with a noise barrier placed on top would result in a similar reduction in noise levels. Since this abatement feature would require an overall height of 21 feet, it may be aesthetically disproportionate and out of character with the surrounding land uses in the area. The cost to relocate Rover Run is approximately $100,000, and does not include the relocation or reconfiguration of the existing uses that currently occupy the proposed relocation site. 3.4 Effective and Cost Efficient Noise Reduction Measures Based on observations made during the noise monitoring and additional dog count days, as well as data collected from park users as part of the Facility User Surveys, indicate minor modifications made to the existing dog enclosures could result in a substantial reduction in sound emitted from the dog park enclosures. Dog Enclosure Layout: The entrance to the large dog enclosure is directly adjacent to the small dog enclosure.The small dogs routinely bark when they see and hear the large dogs and dog owners enter the large enclosure entrance feature. Attempts to minimize the interaction between the two areas have been made by using a visual barrier which minimizes interaction. While this deterrent significantly reduces visual element of interaction,the small dogs still hear the large dogs entering the facility and are drawn to the area which results in barking. The following steps are recommended to improve the situation and reduce the barking which occurs at this interaction point: 1. Add visual barrier to close"gaps" in visual barriers in the corners of the small dog enclosure o Cost: Minimal (Approximately $500) o Time to Implement: Immediate 2. Increase limits of visual barrier along small dog enclosure to reduce dog interaction o Cost: Minimal(Approximately $2000) o Time to Implement: Immediate 3. Place visual barrier along west side of large dog entrance feature to decrease"large dog-large dog" interaction during the entering/exit period o Cost: Minimal(Approximately $1000) o Time to Implement: Immediate 4. Relocate entrance to large dog enclosure further west(non-adjacent)to avoid interaction area. o Cost: Minimal (Approximately $7,500-$10,000) Veterans Community Park—Rover Run 10 ESA/Project No.D140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page-195- 3/10/2015 11 .C. o Time to Implement: Minimal Planning/Design Time/Construction Time required 5. Additional Signage indicating dog park user rules`Be cognoscente of neighbors""Keep dogs quiet"etc. o Cost: Minimal (Approximately $500) o Time to Implement: Minimal Planning/Design Time/Construction Time required o Time to Implement: Immediate Observation by noise monitoring staff along with discussions/surveys of dog owners indicates that the above noise reduction measures would result in an immediate reduction in"barking" caused by small dog and large dog interaction. These"outbursts"tend to result in the highest Lmax levels and longevity of barking which can be heard by the residents. Veterans Community Park—Rover Run 1 1 ESA!Project No.D140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page -196- 3/10/2015 11.C. o I) N W m� m E J y m 4 m T{tCN a y Z telk er T N m ar ¢ 3 .cE, D a_ to pp 'C c & J E,..€. "; - E Co" d' Z OD (j k. d I'CO' is to r; . , ' { a I i 0, 'a ,.. „_ L_ , , 4 `; ■ ``" 0 6 ' ' t3; 1 i ' 1L)F i tr 1 i c CO 3., Ca ..... y .. � � I � " ° ,°i �� Packet Page-197- 3/10/2015 11 .C. SECTION 4 Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the measured sound levels and the predictive computer modeling that has been conducted and presented in this report, it does not appear that sound levels resulting from the operation of the Rover Run dog park result in an overall increase in the community noise levels experienced by the Stonebridge Community. As discussed,that is not to say that barking dogs within Rover Run are inaudible,but the duration and frequency does not appear to be significant enough to result in an overall increase in community noise levels. Due to the subjective nature of sound levels and how they are perceived by different individuals,there may, or may not be a certain degree of annoyance associated with the activities at Rover Run. Computer modeling was also conducted as part of this analysis. The two scenarios evaluated predicted sound levels if Rover Run is relocated to the north of its current location, and what the possible benefit and cost of providing noise abatement along the southern edge of Veterans Community Park if Rover Run remains in the current location. The relocation of Rover Run to the north would potentially result in an approximate 5-6 dB(A) reduction in noise levels resulting from barking dogs. This is a reduction that would be considered readily perceptible to the adjacent residences within Stonebridge Country Club. If Rover Run were to remain in its current location, a noise barrier(or combination of an earth • berm and a noise barrier)of 21 feet in height and approximately 783 feet in length would be required to provide a similar reduction in noise levels. At that height and length,the total cost is approximately $660,809. Since it appears that both abatement measures(Rover Run relocation and a noise barrier)would provide similar noise level reductions,relocation of the park is preferred over the noise barrier since a 21-foot tall abatement feature may be aesthetically disproportionate and out of character with the surrounding land uses. The cost to relocate Rover Run is approximately $100,000, and does not include the relocation or reconfiguration of the existing uses that currently occupy the proposed relocation site. As such,a direct comparison cannot be made between the two abatement measures. Since the results of this analysis have concluded that it does not appear that Rover Run causes an increase in the overall community noise levels experienced by the Stonebridge Community, no action on the part of the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department is recommended. However,the recommendations in Section 3.4 are considered much more cost effective and could provide a greater return on investment when compared to a noise barrier. Furthermore, if Rover Run is relocated to the north, it is advised that the current space be left vacant and not replaced with another activity or use that may cause a similar or greater level of annoyance to the adjacent residences. Veterans Community Park—Rover Run 12 ESA/Project No.D140348.00 Final Noise Study Technical Memorandum March 2015 Packet Page-198- 3/10/2015 11 .C. APPENDIX A Additional Dog Count Survey Data Packet Page-199- 3/10/2015 11 .C. ROVER RUN DOG PARK: DOG SURVEY* Performed by: CH2M HILL Date: 2/7/2015 Weather: Sunny LARGE DOG SMALL DOG TIME (Total) (Total) TOTAL DOGS 8:00 7 3 10 8:15 6 2 8 8:30 7 6 13 8:45 8 7 15 9:00 9 5 14 9:15 10 8 18 9:30 9 10 19 9:45 9 8 17 10:00 15 7 22 10:15 15 3 18 10:30 8 3 11 10:45 10 8 18 11:00 10 7 17 11:15 12 4 16 11:30 11 6 17 11:45 10 6 16 12:00 10 5 15 Average I 10 6 16 * Survey performed to validate usage documented during Noise Monitoring (Performed on 1/31/15). Counts taken at 15 Min Intervals between 8:00 AM and 12:00 PM Packet Page-200- 3/10/2015 11 .C. ROVER RUN DOG PARK: DOG SURVEY* Performed by: CH2M HILL Date: 2/14/2015 Weather: Sunny - Cold** LARGE DOG SMALL DOG TIME (Total) (Total) TOTAL DOGS 8:00 6 3 9 8:15 5 4 9 8:30 7 3 10 8:45 9 1 10 9:00 11 2 13 9:15 11 2 13 9:30 8 6 14 9:45 5 7 12 10:00 6 6 12 10:15 13 10 23 10:30 9 9 18 10:45 6 8 14 11:00 9 3 12 11:15 13 0 13 11:30 13 0 13 11:45 13 2 15 12:00 11 2 13 Average 9 4 13 * Survey performed to validate usage documented during Noise Monitoring (Performed on 1/31/15). Counts taken at 15 Min Intervals between 8:00 AM and 12:00 PM * * Cold weather effected usage per users who were surveyed Packet Page -201- 3/10/2015 11 .C. APPENDIX B Measured Sound Levels and Observation Sheets Packet Page-202- 3/10/2015 11.C. nom �o.� � ooT eoe �,°n°0ccceevmea acacacce ,noccce a �ncc eaav a as a e ea e v va a ce a a as u'�i e .nomu+u+e aaa v"'i u+ v u+ aevena�n v�v �n vu"ia a v°+�n v+e ev e .n u+vvi aav v+�n v+u+ v+ va J m m m v o.n m v e m o m .n o o m m v moo in e o w ., n o m m m °u au�i.on v�'i in v+e a a�"n vei u°+ i°n.n •,m m �� m�inw a N �uriN a v e in v+.nee ur u+�n wv+ .n�n a N w ; .E e v e v e e a a e v a e v v e e e e v e e v e J m o o a Ev J .+ory mmo � am a mm n u? n o or o.. m m ^Nmu amm.� u ov1 e c m ^ env u°+i°n Iona a vv "'.°n° inm�n�,°neon ,non ,nmminee �°n�umiu+Ciumiumi�ne�nv� �n �nmvv �nu��nvv �n o av ve .n�nev eeu+ �ne v eevv+ .n u+ v+ u+ m o m o m m N o v mm nm r .mi;; ;°u nv,mm ;nm m in ; :nmmm ;n ;; m ev —u�"i e a a �n vmi a a v^'i c uri u .n u+u+a .n m u+ .n m m m m m�n m .n mo ^. ! a evo� a ; a E e v v e < a v a a a a°v i a°e v e l a v;e v e v v e v e e v v v e °v v e e e e v v e e v e e e e e e v m v .. °� ;; mm�o nom m ;;;; nrn u.m m ;n ion �l; ; u+ ici1 i; .n m ee u�ia < eu,u� m u+ui.n m min.n m.n�o�nm u N� vaae°e eaaaa°e�°n�°necacau°+ eu"i .n�n e .n�nvv+ e�n.n .n v.�+ ✓+u+ eacev�ia v^'i .n viv ein u+e u+NCV .°n v"i u+ vcaev I — eveaaevvevvevveaevu�veva�nvevveveeveevvev vv .nv • a v ev v v a eu,v vc�°n v .°n u+�n.n u+evaa��i+�n u+v+ev even�n v .n u+�on uo+�✓+�+v+ ✓+ �++u+ �+v e a u�i ao e a a umi.n .n u+ u+e a «m .n o m m e m �•, e � m — e ,ne ,neee ,nv,.nee ,n,n,nv„n,n ,n�aa ,n,n,n,n,n,n ,ne,n,n,nu„n,n,n.n,n .n,n ,n�,n ee .E e E v a .n v .n v a a .n v+.°n aamv+�n.n u+.n �n .n eav��n vi u+in �N �� inm�NUi min�NVimNm�n v°'ia a .n �nm non.n u+v� m �n �n.n v+ m <m d O n a<e V n lO u�i m c V N OG ri aG<N Q ni OD oG m T uC n � e e v v v < e a ev a v ee a a a ce eveevva ca a u`{ie umi viaw< e a v°+n rove ine Ina e n a .+eMm oo a movv m e.. w oao 1i ev`red; a e • v v v v e e a v v v v e v e v e v v v v v a vc °v v v v v e v v v e v v v v e v e e v v v v v v v e o v v v e a c v v v a a a e v e v v v v e c c a e v v v v v e v e e v v e a a a c< e v c v e e v v a c a v v e v v v v v v v m n o m e m e0 � ocvveeeeeaceeeeeaau^ evuv.n avavvaevvvvvavvaaenneaae^< eeveeveaaa — �neacea evcaaun'icacu'"i v+v+a�n'n v+�n u"'iaeevac u+evevasaaac eac a cv, Nm v o e N mein u+in,na a v eacu�u`"ia e v a veecacu+�nv v+ �nvc v°+✓"'i vc ace a c ern�n E v a e a a a e v c c vvi c a e u�'i 88888888888888888 888 ,988$ 8S88 88 88S88$ 88$ 8SB888888888g8.S8°00°°0888885°0 °o• .n e .n m o mo u E m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m c m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Packet Page-203- 3/10/2015 11 .0. — eeeeeeeeeeaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeQ a aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee J .v N you o ry n v m r+ — mn N» e .nv v e e .n ui.nve e .n env e.n e .onv veve ev ee v '� .on e .ne v v v v.n vvv one env v+v�°nae <aava e e e "' m o m m N n o m m o m m o m v a a r o r a a< v v v e a a a e v v e v v v e v v e e v v a a e e a a e v e e v v e v v a a c e a e a S a e v e v v e v v e a v v E e v»ie umi ,n,n my �n vu+u+v�a umieeu+v+ve ve ev .n u��nve vu+u»i v°ia ui°i a one env ern ev �n vie a v»i .n u+ u°+�o+ � e .n a v .n E — eeeeaaeSSSa< SSSSeSeeaaeaaSS<Seaa<SaeevSeecaeea<eeeeeaeccacee J n v e » m m m m J m o m n o n m o .n a .n in u+�o �o m.n in�n.n�n.n m.n�n u+u+ m�n min vin m .o m.n.n v�vi.0 �c one �n�o ui n m .o ui �o win v+ u'"i °u ain.n vmi goo uni vi u�u+ .n in E v e S S v< v S a e e a S S S S e e v e a e c e v a e e S e e v e e v v e v v e v e e e v e a a e v e v v e v v v v v v 1a .nm .n; uu .n.nu+ v� t7qinu3 ,n ; u� a ; mmm;; m .n om ;a7 mHmu .n u�o;; ; mm: E v v l L e e a v e e v .n e v e v m e e e v e v e N; .n v v v v a m o.n m o n m v e v e v e v v v e e e e v e v v e v e e v v e v e e v v e e v e v e ee S S v v v e v v e a a N o v o a o • en�N�mmmm� �� �m ��m��me .n �+ ��mmmn� � � mm ,nnne� � � vmi $ uriu+mnaeu»immmnim � mn mac N m m m o m e m �e a n m one a m m m v v v v v c c a e a a e e v v< a c e v v v e v v e v v v v v e v a e v v e v v e e v e v v v v v v v v v v v vvv v v v E Ev • e�ova.on°rnvv .nvvn�, v+ v v v v v ev c.°n.°mm� m v e v n n e m m.n c�.°n au"i�°na vmi Svc <v v �n m n .n .en n .e mu, D o m .e - » v o m m o m • v v v v v v v v a S e S v v v v v e v v v v e v v v v v v v e S a S v e v v v v c a a a e ve c v v v v v v v v e v e v .n o v ry �+a .n�n n no m m N L — e v e v v e a a e a v e a vmi v e v v v e a c a c e v v.n v v e v v v e v v e v v v v v e v .n v v a c e < c a a v f �v m o .n o o n o o a e o e m e; eevvicea ace vvve v e va eav vu"'ia ion a ec�°ocvccc .ne �°n ;;;,; a u°i,; e e v e v a u»i ;" .n a.n moo, nemom vi E v eeee eeSSa eeee eeee ee eeee eeeeeee v e eeeeeeeee SSeSSeeeeeeeeeeeeeee E m env a v a ,nvvv ea a �°o evvevvevc ac cauiDi �n v»ia eemvv a vvv`"ic v»iaa vmia u°�i umi vav a ve e .n u� .n vin m o » ..a n o m • v < S c v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v e S e e S S e v v e S S e S S<e S< v v v v v v v v v v < v v v e B88888888888888888888888888888888B888E888888888888888Eg888888 Packet Page-204- 3/10/2015 11 .C. • aaeaa<Qaaeaaeeeaaeaaeaaaeaaeaaaeaaeaaaaeeaaaaaeeaaaaaeaeaa e — m ea a m m in e a m � via u, e .na m.nm� e�n� mv+ mmmuai v. .na mv+ m v,v,� m�� ma m v, e a�rvn v. a a a a ae u,aa N � m e m .n o o a o m e a v; ae as a e a a a e; c a a< a e a w ; v e a c e e a a e a a e a a e a e v a a e a e e a v a a a e a<e a < E E o N m m a n m • e a e e a a e a a a a i ee e e v e c a e v a a a e a a e e a a e a e e a a a w, a —e i as v e a a e;a a e a a a a e a e a a a a as ; a c e e a a e a a a c.on e e a e a v e e ; a e a a e a a e 4 v '� m one mine m.nea v+inNV+ v+v+v+v+v+ eea�n a u, a ee a e.n�nae Ana u,Ana ern �v+ v+�n murvi .on c�nea mm v+�n e .n r o e o r in m o m N E ,n ma �a°v am e a mut m� � as a v a e u, aa<evae as aea a eu, v+ e��e e a a a' J ae a a e e a a e e a a e e a a e a a a e a a e a a a a v,a e e a a v, eaaenev, eeaev,u, aaeaav, ev,��< v, v,�v, v, v,� mv,mu,v,v, � v,u, a v, mmu,a u,�v,m� av, ea �v°, n a m — m mmu,m v,m� N m m.n mu1°+.on u4Oi � �m me � m mu+mmm m� mm m.cm m m�m .n m mmmn m�� mmmv+ �nm in v+ o� — ut in m ,n minm�� m n.nn mm m.n �nm m.n m m m m ran n mm.ommm m mnmm ran n.�'emm mm m m mm.n me �v°`i �� E• a E , ;m En ;r ; m n w n i m ; ; .o v,;;;; m m m .e m n n n m a m v+; v, m m m vn m o 0 m o ry e a a e e a a e a a a a a a a a a e a a e e a a e a e e a e a a e a a e ; a e e a a e e a a a a a a e a a a m o o m o a m m o m a v+ • m v,a.n.n�.°n� �m.ne � u, .n v�'ia vrvim .n v+ v+ vnia v"i a inm v+ a .n a .n non � v, ut.n a e v,a av, amaemm.n v,,n ,nm mo m m e e a n rva rvmom.-nom a a a a a a a a a e a as e a a a a a a e a a a a a a e a a a e a a a e e a e e a c e c ea as<ea a a e E .rvn.en cu+ m�v+� u,� v,a u,v,.n .na mm m m m� ut m a m.n u, a v.e .nn v,v+ m.nma.n �.°nv umia vrviae inn m v�v+m m.nm E 888 88888888888888888 °08888888888 °o o S °88888888888 Packet Page -205- Site#: f ESA Noise Measurement Data Sheet 3/10/2015 11 .C. Date: January 31,2015 Measurement Taken By MSM Project: Veterans Community Park,Rover Run Noise Study Site ID: 1 � % .C 1 r A ! g1° 4-2 . 00q 1.rit" W t.., voi 1- i!?a( 6'L i Weather Conditions: Clear: Partly Cloudy: Cloudy: Other: Temperature: Start: ? End: -7 t (°F) Wind Direction: Start: /U C; End: ` ' f. Wind Speed(Start): Min: LI Max: Average: . (mph) Wind Speed(End): Min: Max: I 2_ Average: K , 4. (mph) Humidity: Start: 3-62. End: r..a 2- Equipment Data ^� Sound Level Meter: �J 1 2-t Serial Number: 0 �V Date of Last Traceable Calibration: 3 . 2,7 . . t q Calibration: Start: it `I , End: /i LI*0 " ,/ J �j Battery: Start: I f t`°` End: (",) Weighting Scale: A Response: Slow Calibrator: Lr) - ii /f' Serial Number: 2-2.-(? Results: Leq: Lmin: Lmax: Lpeak: in dB(A) L01: L10: L50: L99: Major Noise Sources: , .X:r(% 01.95e,0../ T7C4 c .e Background Noise Sources: Other Notes/Observations: Packet Page-206- l Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study 3/10/2015 11 .C. Measurement Observations / Site# / Observed BY: (7d ' ate:January 31,2015 _ '7 7 y,� -) • Time Observation `' ;"70. 1 M1,,, ` t4:Cty, 41tGt .- ji . __ ( , t - �, s ,,,, >, 11 >k-.1tr tl ) 1 . a �'�r,>f"i�� � rlk�tn �1✓c r., c �, c vfr'� lrt.,tlt`� -fit.✓ir)i) (vu✓t �1'"'--. r,4 , t.,_.. f it'.- ---- (\t.71,1,1A `-c:.r^(.t' C.' t 5 C 1 {V.)L. k 1 1Ci S e. -t't,,.N I t,r1✓+r c k'-i,Le.Q U'c '4'C.:^1 i.L'r^1/' J I/,c k' ^ 1'ti,.f 04. 1,ce t Li r t,Z E n-- v„A..v, 1,, 6-vvsf-- _ id - :(z Ci,, , - c,.../ pelt, i:i' jL- x l9rk-5 Ds E c,n'J"— r _ "'� Z F ",'�` /3'.`1 I.�V14 ,---r C7 i C 1 ' / i� iin `j ,5`""� it krv1 !<: (Icy pare r-� (`)<-„h bi,r4 .) ,.iv i>.,l■ 1.:1.,,, t t.- 4K1 - -- ? , `f-( Cc' ,0"r'<tC.,. ( „4 cr,,r,.. ‘-'! }''''' .- -- 1`r /CGS;✓ cfv {U ;( l .bi r ice. t�� y), r't t.�-t 1 -' , � ',,f i ' 1 C1 1}f( Qv L- 1-1..,/t'r L.--t 101 i h 2. IL) 2 c { 0 ' 1 t r 2 7 0,1.---.-F' 1`f,I f .x.ar `-}_. 01 4..' e t tc/ Rc".G;t 1!'"' ( iL Kr x ,1 1. \5 C.0-\,.'17 ., ' { C�,�2 (c`,, "" K• ii C �" /1<k" ,.- �.�1 �.L� L I ( ,' 30 7C/f!7 (,�1G, /2-70,--ell...-44-1 / l !C[,-? to .` 1),k G. /../1 SfJjG ,/ ,,,,err /' ,0:,,,,. 6, Ae)c-- ‹-(c.,,-€..._, 1-I —..,.ik-.-I,- /C)-1--4...fr"" 13 3 ( ( f'.,.- 7) ;/ 13 : 3 `l (--,r Rt-,v : 3r 6): tit' (w1' e.20"`` 1 /0 r U/U/ ' 5i',=.)1, 5,— ci 2 t'' 2 A-t;.t: :,� . ! --.. 1 0 <- Htrc'kCit [2C1,,„) 1,1'_,"-ic C ' .3t�''1- v'' s , rcVt t& 1 ^, ` Packet Page-207- !! 1;i ^ Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study 3/10/2015 11.C. f Measurement Observations Site# f Observed BY: 0 4C 1,1/ Date:January 31,2015 Time Observation t . ()C° (Cy- Day" C(, I rov ho;o. lroc. : OA Yno 11-r, (C\\\vt r��._ ?. f I 11— f v" chi'?rr 1` C V to, ) 1 10 -Peers �v\ Packet Page-208- Site#: ---- ESA Noise Measurement Data Sheet 3/10/2015 11 .C. Date: January 31,2015 Measurement Taken By: MSM Project: Veterans Community Park,Rover Run Noise Study Site ID: .2L /6 . 12 f`) ed o -1-7. o 3 i '/C P M_ ct1 G (, a,Y - , Weather Conditions: Clear: ) Partly Cloudy: Cloudy: Other: Temperature: Start: J 2- End: 7 ( (CF) . ..' ."K rr" Wind Direction: Start: End: (✓ G Wind Speed(Start): Min: g Max: i/ Average: (.4. ..S- (mph) Wind Speed(End): Min: Max: t 1 2.-' Average: `! (mph) Humidity: Start: LS-1 End: 40-2, Equipment Data (� Sound Level Meter: i? �` Serial Number: L1 f Cl Date of Last Traceable Calibration: J , 2 L.Oi `t Calibration: Start: I(`i . t''''End: f j(LI. (.) c r. / Battery: Start: t / 5� 749- End: 6°37c Weighting Scale: A Response: Slow Calibrator: L-1) (%fl /CV Serial Number: r .- Results: Leq: Lmin: Lmax: Lpeak: in dB(A) L01: L10: L50: L99: Major Noise Sources: Sc l 0 V9-C.,`"--" ,(16't S l's-1--c-t5 Background Noise Sources: Other Notes/Observations: Packet Page-209- Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study ,Jc / 3/10/2015 11 .C. Measurement Observations Site# Observed BY: fiD�' Date:January 31,2015 el r ' / Time (r7A Observation S.`.' 1 C,. ;:1 . 74;,,-,1/ 7',. i{ Y Li I. /1 E� LI Y T) ,/ . & /Al ,, ,P •4" 1., si ti.cam (14' /1)4._ T., ,/,Z,/,.(;... fly' .-17 C i -:f! l'7 L".., /v...'1,: 1,1 4 AIL r74,7,(/`'J .i._ I 3- - .0- 3 C .,. J-c `, /1 >J A. ,,k Y: s` S' 7-/i,/( %,., /(' ,o 4/,,,.,,i T J 1 J .r 7 /,.-4,L i( 1,-_, 1,,,,- 1 `I c'"A I ur) c. n / / . l) ( IJ'' o4°,r`J �. ,ze,/,1i/ ` 1- iA !) "j ie ( .j /�1 ,„, J" . C,cl7/ ' , 1 3 i), . I;.-: 14 /,,le .4.:C c 1 ( Li h 1. - 1g 7,.k 1,y . , ci ' I1, , ' 1/..;r. ,y7 rdh ,�, 1P,. , c"I 17 1,),-,...,0 'Y• - rJ ...7,- ■,- i^r'r, it.." -j I v- c, /R., ,iJt ,, �4/X 7 • 1 5 r) < < �'^,l/I , ',//{ 1 : >J et({ti/, J,, / /ith. ' 3 , Z. . / n `,' ? p 7 j'.:{f 1)c i��-,(( - / Xci 3 o - 9 J / t-', 4) !> ., .., iiiit �J. ,:•JtC ''!' 'A' 1,.i 70,.-?,i1 I I r.,,/r,' L'� 1�/I> I! L4I�,44,,.e -5✓ 9 . , r D, Z.I( (..4K�\ Ir/ I., C X 5 .' 3 7 (,j,r 0 £iL c-(/' 1✓✓ r (,✓; 4(,9 r r% 7� ( .; 4�6,.1i,,/ `1 . ] `I ,si .14: rK.r c' . 1 L- t S , '-, f • t ` i !::>,,' c v-u1 Packet Page-210- Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study 3/10/2015 11 .C. Measurement Observations / 4,-c°2 Site# r� Observed BY: ("f ate:January 31,2015 1,i. ,a.1) ✓7>,i;,/ 7C„, -, Time Observation Y c/ q G/ N /-; Ce f r.1 4 1 1ci„, ti IV of 17 ., ` ,rei .6K1 lb tit_ej f., ✓r cl,° )-" 74,,,i{ ,A,,d'4f 4-t,a,0., 1 'VC. i) r,i i.,t,,'- <.4 X 9 y 7 D., I,41/ /r.%'/i `" rt.t f t.!l _ t." ,.7✓ , r( It %l ff /l / X .S"v (---cr✓e'," 1 Ise„.1 G�''rJ J t o/,-,.,/ Li 5`,4k, ✓ ,A�( 1 . /L .t 7r tf;r' fA' `1 . T`5-- ,/,. C/,t�. ., # q L,j ks v.- * s7 Pp), ACe{<<- 4s.,,.i -- ,44.„ ' /// 4. // 1.--. .(/I- I 1U.4V � r IAl ` 1_4,,,/ ! : cL,.. D,..: ci,-r-- 1 --/,r E,,,,,-`' 71-7:),.-.)'---v—,''- /0 u.\ 1)d, /� (r+ K./._x/ - A,,,/ /0-£0 I, , -e4 (IQ) 4/ Id 31 )- Vii; /1 -4/'°..4R' 'il,7 1 �:'r r /1,A,d ,e6,, .r- -- C,,c 4- eg, 4:_,I/ a ys-Y 1 d /� /0: 0=-01 v,�-Jl 41-(,./-(,./ � I V,'i ,-, -- „r� 4-,-/A y:.,,.' "4--).tin az,fa. c. !) , ., .4 -T-;,,:,,t. / , (�/ L,. ( 'sCF// ,F�T L".._. C f � f f 9 , LI ,i r ,�,.0� -" (4y . G'-.7.4�- C '. j I)EL;f 4 — 'r sx-a-1 ,,, 11 fu.^47 IC I'r v(ci j)44 ,,.r cc,/ -/ .t_((.1-:(___# -___,,1-) ajo f(' !'.,t�rT7,'- / .7 -07,i .r' - l��C- L:Tic ,•,✓f. XImo? . 3 t ' , .°i ca' , L 1, - c://r q.7,1S, ,.,'- /0 ( 1e Fl./ - r. _ ,, -- `_,..) /U ' , .> D, 1 :s i',,,.f k 1 ,>1 7- ` ' ',z,, ti l,? /�/r-7 l 'i 2, /,,,.r -r' 10 34- Di;; . i_4 16)4 .n r..7 - -���� ?1 ) Y 'GI 31- %� �i 7 ',� s. i /0- 210 v..'1( 1i c t 1ft C r-'c- w T"'f r !oo-i-- 6 I. ,--- r Packet Page-211- Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study 3/10/2015 11 .C. Measurement Observations Site# " Observed BY: 6'" Date:January 31,2015 Time / Observation Id rH t` Dci, ,4,f1( /lf k f,,,-„1 Ic, '-f-7 br E._41( ,1, 1,,,1 c-, _ /Gr 11 ° rJit ,2-.i(/( P `'e/\ -(G / 1!Y S /u : y D,f.. A_z/l /:4 Kf i�,, t 1 cr• )-0 Oct 1 ✓ /l e-1, .t l 6, ./ f.5.),A g. 1/��11 /,�(`f:Irt I ,/" p . lam.- 3-3 'Y '.,,, Lr ///.-- `7 !'„ 1/7-3 C4Ie .a. 17�..- . G„jSy., t�.+<.l,4•” '4 taA4, _ /4 } /0 ' ? b, 11 44' ; ,,/ I ( 4„,,,.., f t0 .7:7 P9rr_. 4% ivy -ferlrT /tr:.,,t d l,t! 2 i i. /t1 S - ? � .,r r 7 .. .. ( I,..) '. .si 6� yid/ 1 /�4J( f'.., '" ..,i- � fj h�I1 %- . ...r /c L /n7 7`r J( `i I h G, G .I�� fF e.1,-;,,,7 c ,V,.. r f r ,r1-1 (. 37, , 0. a -0, 7 ,i1,-,.. I( .0,)-- 1)e e; I/. . /�.(4' -I,', 7 r C 'u `i <<c 4 4/( /4 /�1 ,,. 1" .,L (, <<1-'/� /l i 1:e1/�. �,.°t.J'—r:r�; 'h,, , Ai,.'Tit «.J z• .4.-a' G' (//• 1 !,-/r;4,J,I - /,),..,,...., --�,? i,, c i 1I:l( e ,/ / . 67,J-ri � 1),.1-2.... ci ,..1 ,.E-- (nzt-) ( I 1,; / r (, f I:I. 13I:c /J—1 (' ,,-4 1 / 1 j ): it Da g4,K 14,4i -- 7c; r i c 7t D 7 1'... ! 4.4 -- l /-,).. .it,) ,i, jar°I bi A'_} , ✓�, fr. ,2-)-- it tr-- ft if 11 7 1 t)rl.- (. � - Yr1iid - i�-W kf.t , r ii:„7 i 1 ;eb IA v if -.- . x ' ' ,R. ',,`t ckA- "Fn 6.>Jer ,It„,,i.0 ‘1-1121' ;04” (:).14 1v 11141''' � "- /12 ,>L De ..(IC -.,t-7 , jj_'3( It r( t1 Packet Page-212- Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study 3/10/2015 11 .C. Measurement Observations Site# Observed BY: ate:January 31,2015 Time Observation // 31 , -f �f f` ,-tee r?L l PS(` )j f i gf jryit( !p( (� /� � /1 :90 l�r 14.4 r-4,( ��., ,t, ,,7- ..rp,al 11. jib 3 Packet Page-213- Site#: ESA Noise Measurement Data Sheet 3/10/2015 11 .C. Date: January 31,2015 Measurement Taken By: MSM Project: Veterans Community Park, Rover Run Noise Study / / NI C� 1Grr( wit t , �� / 1 /_ P6.-4- Site ID: 2W` L7, 1ZZ , t Ul °►fir, Itu1 Vv ji,t5t of,,. Side ejoi ��116.�., 1 ` J Weather Conditions: Clear: Partly Cloudy: Cloudy: Other: Temperature: Start: 5 Z,. End: -"7 ( (SF) Wind Direction: Start: 1%.1( End: �1\Jr;, c Wind Speed(Start): Min: q Max: Average:(.o- (mph) Wind Speed(End): Min: "7 Max: t . Average: c". s4 (mph) Humidity: Start: r(,. End: (,a�. Equipment Data Sound Level Meter: '` ". `" Serial Number: 761 7(.7 Date of Last Traceable Calibration: J ., /.3 , (`t Calibration: Start: fl • 0 End: Il g.° Battery: Start: its End: J 15 ., Weighting Scale: A Response: Slow Calibrator: c t} Serial Number: e1 1 Results: Leq: Lmin: Lmax: Lpeak: in dB(A) L01: L10: L50: L99: Major Noise Sources: ;;'%')t u`v::J"i Cry J tiz.c, Background Noise Sources: Other Notes/Observations: Packet Page-214- G) Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study 3/10/2015 11 .C. Measurement Observations Site# Observed BY: 04 st- ate:January 31,2015 /,, rr_ �l,":r, (t L.(r,C (7,12-1' 13 DIG .,�I G Lv, ff V' t'J (f✓1 I b.(( b�'G T_C c_ 12(Kr ll. Time Observation S (q S--c. >tc(i. 11 a0,1 S 8 S-3 Lam-(• S S(�. „ "c),-, tr'' = yS_- Oda g'j Sv.-c( Li 'L 2. e Ser. f-c 5(c_w, et f /170(4-, / ( S (c-rf sic.P� J `/ Lf� � `: 5~� ��I" do t Jej ,df7 -4(f 3 63 . 01 , le)111. 116 Iv (a=‘lI 1! 0`) .Sh'6If zinc t �c4 'a J ,. `- Ccft. S([1A . J ('te 64,4 ci, -, r , � 7 '. (-7 cC.-fC J( < F{- �/r' i' I.15 ()(if-1(` i(t i lI' k� +- r1 J i 1/1,-k 1'� (r '.-2A-) t- �k In, c- V if . '. 2:5 %• V K-S T ,• L (G f T "r v 1 .2 r �t L c c, c 5 ( • 2, i1G . ) J'z ,,,,,,, ,, cf r. -•'-\ e,, , . ....,r U may. ,L: S ALu i�`; . ) �� 5(I,., t 7 r,-, i ( ( ,1, 0 _`., Packet Page-215- ),' r c, ,s/c L Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study 3/10/2015 11 .C. ,Z Measurement Observations Site# , Observed BY: VIA ,1,11/'` Date:January 31, 2015 c..-i•,.-J, arts+) L tt'14.-c3 I -M- i J C L J L Time Observation Y qr.-(c SI'v'( i do(5 f ":iQ- (fv.(,..l i h>l�) h'. y_ •, , 1 1". ‘-(Y 1,1 v< + ,y,..4-.e..._ P'. s- ( rry k i - q'..5-1-- L<t� (r.-,' L. .l �.") ,c f� y e ? L 6�(k. v , ir- 14, ,,A-- ,, U (J f L. -AN' fr G-) -.0-? 11-,,,.J(6"S /V !/+-) rjo,K'- I- 0,..ai-,,'` 1zl�-,`r ( �c.r� IC) '• -2--) OU.7i--t'/ i'i.e(7ihI t I �_✓k- 5 I0 Ly `�U'' S J -=-, iO •. LC n) -•' =5 (0 `• LL '` r t 6,,i-.e_- (0 `. 3(2 j^),=' V-S I '.1 ( ncf ►=5 ( 0 ,7h r?G k.y (0 , cI R U %/{! ic, ht — i '- C "1 k_2vi fi-(LIf) T 6°(cf)Or'll _ t 1)c, c I- ° frt ---) , , 6 'u ' ' r 11/'''''° 4 1 r. 6'J 61(/" ;. 1(1<i' (0 L.,((cl J_� - � ` ( II• o C) ,,k ; -f- C.�`+ `' 1 C11� I k .' t. ,',b 1, ' ."1„..0 uruski ;✓�'h “ a,Q--`' l ( c` `1 ys 6 5I ,l ( F `� . -( S g ' ' , -3 0 s6 L 11 k k i c L i, -mot s ' Packet Page-216- ` I Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study 3/10/2015 11.C. Measurement Observations Site# Observed BY: 111,S OA- Jte:January 31,2015 Time Observation Cip 1/ {/ J f f L) 13£-J I ' 3L1 ry " ." 3 Packet Page-217- Site#: Li ESA Noise Measurement Data Sheet 3/10/2015 11 .C. Date: January 31,2015 Measurement Taken By: MSM Project: Veterans Community Park,Rover Run Noise Study Site ID: 26 C l ti 'm.5 31 f`a J o Li/. 0 Z� ' Kr / 1 Pc id& L h—L., / i Weather Conditions: C......' r: Partly Cloudy: Cloudy: Other: Temperature: Start: ,5 Z End: —71 (°F) Wind Direction: Start: kJ L:', End: eI , Wind Speed(Start): Min: Max: 3 Average: (,i• S (mph) Wind Speed(End): Min: 2 Max: 12 Average: '. J (mph) Humidity: Start: S ) End: is 7i Equipment Data Sound Level Meter: Lb cc.s 2'``�'� Serial Number: / ,7 C, 2 Date of Last Traceable Calibration: . I . 2... f l Calibration: Start: it�C( U End: I H ,0 Battery: Start: 11 5 f " End: ?iU! (0 Weighting Scale: A Response: Slow Calibrator: 6'1) CJ— 2,-(31) Serial Number: _7ca Results: Leg: Lmin: Lmax: Lpeak: in dB(A) L01: r L10: L50: L99: Major Noise Sources: C.,..6 0& e'✓ %/...-' 6'4 (1ti2..t. "}` Background Noise Sources: Other Notes/Observations: Packet Page-218- Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study 3/10/2015 11 .C. ,/ Measurement Observations Site# / Observed BY:, )11(.5 ate:January 31,2015 IJ CA'7t-: (0 n,46--,11-- �f 1 'i p a' e/ I Time Observation f3: 3 p)01.11, fti. li!.li Pa i 8.,c"-) 1 ,'u \ r ()`‘St Clidilen TALe,ir L >,►'�C :i4r\ 1,1,-,ral Do 1 IY 1 C. .( r ow ) I tl 'ect i 2 / /2ac'4c (f?j/cr.E ©,:of I hon -i-7 YY (-L CCL(,' 11 tiI,e 1Z'i,vcLI(c" :J (i't'J izti k ,. e 1-7 a KA: I rj)irl S n- a l- (t !I r<• c /Oq />l-i'n( ci: y`/ eL,L1-) 4i/ de q L4L--•f/f (iY d/if CI- cS 19(111C (nil fxaj' 1cc'ir( e: IL, n)C14,y1& 3( /filtni'aicL', rOLqc i': 4/ 7 ,..5C.r c ani S -6/ail c(c!y .4-i'L 6: 7 h GVl K -iv-u-)1 i, Ca i hi eve nvva.i-di!J (76-,.)Li p?C2i /L h 4-I S1ra U do j Pa r K 1301 t J 8; Ici c..i0 q btu lc 1ri.rn nt,1 CioIx -hoOda 9 IDA 1,' k- 11' ('Y ,s /1-0_". a ( 1C? j / S2 g : /7Ctli(G h ill lac; l� 1ic=- C`. 55 /w f /,�C/K--- ft' ' '/ ' G'-/(-"("/ /--74,-( t' C V . '5� 4.4 ,i `(C (-14:11-) .3/11c/.(r ("1)6:7 1 C/K-, F<)`1 -10 Y-W\u hi1VY '‘'‘AC- )C. CA..0! Nit' I`.11'\ J ("✓u111\ ,C)1'\ CUU (t d i')I t I( l c- (I,'w 1:)lti LA 11,0 f' %11 lip i 'ggt' ( INi 1^(r/1` G 01 19(( ( /C i 1-1 ``j F7-rr ..,f e,/,-,'," pa i = ` j J ct• 0 041 tAl ''I (-1,1 )1 .-(,0 f2aifL u C 1 L; i 7 Ci l' "� . C`� I� �i( 1 if 1 -(c t'1 �i t,�� i F c- ct;lL DOt lc (l�L j h!U1') (T(' 0:a (it ik_ C-,.t1 ID A V -16)(11 F-1^ :'`,'1 -h: 1 5( 'I1 1 b a t iC i (1./14(-) f\-z-( ti Ala or.c rt 0 ci cl ., A Z, t1, i GI-1ho (S 10:i( ((TA 0 ± G.,1 Da( ((1 1,(_ /4 io Cl i Ic ( ','L-Y■ 0 0,--'7 pa tic 'fi n C t ab f 2 dv s do G, NVN \`.1-1 Oa iC f/i'Lt '1 Int i k14ZS ct 7(L± a`•Z ) 'i7(.jt r hi \-,ei 111 0 (1bq r1:22 \-r l.'r .fyi,r'1 {(1 I Gf,Ii I�2('r-S r'1'�2 r 1 l'.L', �I 1\(_ ("Jc'' \`)'a'i, 9 "( `ri c ! ! v 1 Packet Page-219- Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study 3/10/2015 11 .C. I( Measurement Observations Site# f Observed BY: 9-- 7 Date:January 31,2015 G`G� Time Observation °i.LL, hjA1- \(\ CO1 ring ?G‘! '\;j 1xk\b∎'\(\ c A)\-1' (\oC \p a\ : °C.),,-.-) CA 0:i 611 tC (1A)(Y\ 4-t,fIC i)a vi - `i:,-/1(r; I1el i-51.7)0-J c/OCI I-,Xc-(/v,K f' r:/ ("NI'"II' /O( ld-1i c(TJ/ -r-r-zy i 4 _26-c-1 L ,., 121. 161 )(7;_l'?i;C1,10 fvtlivN l k0ik, p(t,till, el 1 ; 5-1 hp01,,4r\q' ;y '\ Rio parK^' tG'\0 10% 0\ t aa,u (i t'ItiJi , 0,1--- (i/ i,v,ir i-«IO %ai'r'y i i e .1 E .6e- i Krr,'( ►6 t)f,c-3 t L(I'is�i} 'i (t3) pa tic l 0 l 0 _-_-42:G;t- f/'7irv1 ,,/a,/ .!C.-s�-` 1 c.1: l L r)0I-Ce- -4% -) / c4,?%7U4'r i 01..3 hail; fra'n cr; x.,,i, , o :/5 az plc from, do,7 t t r!c_ (C)- 2-0 6-t /c. ii-K.04 do=-l7.z{.l'Z i U % N A 0 \I(:{S. UG l,-)ck .`ii - (1 , . (` ) If\a(D..�_(.1 \f,\r) y cx_i'< (`,.0 I) ari: r�i J1 5 1,�ri* ,l'f=-f:.(�`t 1i 1_ (AM 00•,1L 631c- \- ( .`~tiJ ` 0' 2-7 -1-t U:%() I'�.�'U h iodrs o ci t 6 G.c t, L-:e_(:1 \N ? s 0,0 u( c\?r t\,C Ci())r to )ruti u t,( L.. ,ij•.Li 4�C�t ��' Y�Ji'11 "'� i i` 'Gi r`� t o-5 NE G ll(X.x': s)-)e_ Z. L.t 0' 1` /•_\b(;\ V.WY: (" - lVj r.?i );1)/l\(‘Q. i 1 u 1l 01k V L. 1-y'1 A()'T6 c:t D I 0 Cd I' t`=- . 11,a L2Ct v/L- (7C1'n n ct q I'lb'( Y -DD c4' I i ; G7 'D( I'2 //'7)h'1 '09 /J l/7 Packet Page-220- Veterans Community Park-Rover Run Noise Study 3/10/2015 11 .C. 4 Measurement Observations Site# ! Observed BY: R `-- ate:January 31,2015 P c(c,/c- 3 Time Observation i 1 07 11 On/a •(i' '(n !of)0-, ,(>eez_c =-f., razc-( i ) OR j04 !�''r ' ti , 11 ' r)if-ccs 11 (L. (v\mlq \, DA AC 0,,'\' -k Y1. t, `�}tk\V:✓ ' ` 1 I`7 C�\ -\-e v\ Q.�v\g h,\ n\70 I \-o .V k ; . ILi �l0(.106\vref.t (A ,- cA ' 6,u 11 � IPA L. R - a V'i\ - 1.1.. \5 1t1 1N Ot 'p.,h A- jr\(' 'I irl\1\ 1rS 1 : 10 r all 0 (.\ `■) L-, \".)A,-t1;.\- ' \-)6k V L' t‘'' 'C) Mk.)n \*t)Y .C..Q L and pi ( (C e d k L(.ki Lip it: Z1 (1 061 --Iii4L-_, f1'v;/1 1. file f)1_. t lC \ I i, 1 ,A \')\V�\ ' .11 ), \c(,k 1 L 11`n,.,(Th 010 1' c 1. 1 '.Lz\ hc`,1 crY'31Y ç) \'\: 1t lc COD \-)C,4 IL ci'Onr1 °ai' 11 L i) 10,1-1 19(( 1,L. r rr ' cm'.& 11 Z,c1 ( 101,31 boo a, KN—N...\ ' oav K-• 11 '.275 ((-\-yq- 1'.)C.&11'i, Ci ) (\ 't-\r `;1'a\ .-1 1 1*-`j i M i\ L--f,A\( \r \\1\,"S'iC4CX,Ki `,1',1-)i \DC,C. \., ,,\` { , 1(10.1 Di\ ,1, 1 )% `''1 l ' 1(# i'i Li Y:S '1 v7"Vi l,f1 j.--) G 1 Jai I I . �/f c1, 0(1 L-2(4 {'1.1-, ' (."- 7 (L r i'F" f 1 f'. Jr �f",i .l �.'9? ;� 1/ /) � r' ( iii c; ?%.Jc. .;�'7,%'c'4 ^I; ?r 7`on )'?�71.�:i tri I)=�f1 11 'U 2 fc:i (/' 14:1;1 'Oil i, t'r'c'i ' i C 1 r ; orn _ ,) c e_, 11 = `i 3 `►\(\:Ao,)r41 lii i;1 » ('for\N2.Y V'A Hi If)1 #i ':U\-. on i-A-1-0 H '1`' hr/1,i; h''l�t Imhf-t. i \ ti I , , I �C C,\'' ''1 iCkr p�. Cwt w L . 1 Packet Page-221- 3/10/2015 11 .C. APPENDIX C Noise Barrier Cost Estimate and Sketch Packet Page-222- 3/10/2015 11 .C. 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`CO ON 'G 0, eY T Lit M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0') 00 `O N ‘nn 0 E" 0 0 0 0 O O O O N 0.0 � , N C 00 0 0 0 00 LN O O O M 0 0 00 O P F. 00 O U) d' W N 0 N 'n M .O — 0' N 0 N 00 L� O .N-' N LNn 0 iLn N t.y P-, ,9-, u) an 00 Gil J x U tf, EA EA H, di H, ,9 to H, H, fA tf, U, '0 Ell Yi CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 8.Q. g W M O 0 11) 0 0 0 0 0 'n e 0 0 V CO 0 0 ~ M .... n In N N O V) c, M O O O F M z y W F � 0 .5 O 1 U N Cr y {LGGO..'00 j V is O 0 a, m ..5 n G 2 z R z w o °U o a ] U 021 4 ; z w 0 c E w o cra a; y o m 6 O 0 C. .a v w a ❑ o Gi, r. ,,., Z 5 r 9 0 z x N ° F - Z F w 0 e� -' -" + N g G o E. C, z r , 0 a rn $ m .5 U U V W 0 o d Cr U a - 3 m 417 Q y' � "GG '� p Ln re 0 W F Or m flfl E w m E o o° o Ln U] Gil Z WM. g_ G N .. C. ti ��.j z 4 d o0 O . 0 d b z z c •'•, , ,0 g v o W W 5, W m v '..= 0 3 — a a c v 7 w C ib " m on Z 0 0 - d Z o p . X i v U a N H o m O b. Ln o, ~ Z 3 Z z O °o H. F. p 3 u 0 O O Z w j W W W Z Q U o NwZZ "'-' : � CC Z 'c _ dd L0 Z U ,g o' ,, 2 u . NR a nOzeW.. L". wm0 a a. U u) Z w c. 2 u. :. U O � O e..4 '4 n 0 '0 O 00 00 a d y 0 4 -' N M �' N L\ O" OO�c.. Fzzzzzzzzzz ,ou zz Packet Page-223- 3/10/2015 11 .C._ j- I % 2 \ C0 1 / ~ / / k § K I tu t o't ©L 0 \ @ \ \ \ \ 7 2 - PL o }( / p .E. . . . §§ =7;' 03 -- JM - . . . , )\ ;w \ \ : \ ( % § Q. -i/ rc rc [ 3 �} \ ir, ) . ` NL,!! / \ ZEST; \ \ V E((\ \ j z7 ! i \ � \. \ i d »< , . l - ' •r- • f a. W. - ' : ?f #1i v , �r \ , :: } `% 0 L4 Packet Page -224-