Agenda 04/01/1997 R COLLIER
~L ~GZI~ ~LZC SPaS ~LL
(S) ~:-~S ~llS ~l~lSIO~ FOR
AVAZ~LE ~ ~E CO~ ~SSZO~XS' OFFICE L~ ~CESS S~~ FOR ~2,00 ~
1. ~NVOCATION
March 11, 1997 - Regular meeting.
S. PROCLAMATIONS A~D SERVICE AWARDS
A. ~
(1) Proclamation proclaiming March 30 - April S, 1997 aa
Master Gardener Appreciacio~ Week. To be accepted by
Bob PeCerson, Urban Horticulture Agent; L ·
Lindaberry, Florida Cer~£f£ed Master Gardener; Waida
££senbud, F orida Certified ~aaCer Gardener; Wanc~
Otto, Florida Cerci[ied Master Gardener and Earl
Garrett0 Florida Cerci[ied Master Gardener.
(2) Procla~ation proclaiming April al Conservancy
¥olunteer Month in Collier County. To be accepted by
David Guggenhei~, President & CEO.
B. Service Awards
Jan Bennett - Agriculture - 20 years
£rvin Collins - Road & Bridge - 1S years
¢. prefencaciona
6. ~PPROVAL OF ChERK'S REPORT
%. ANALYSIS OF CKANGES TO.ESE/YES FOR CONTINGENCIES
April 1, 1997
Oenar·l P'~nd0 (003.) £or FY 96/9?
2, Coatmiflity Devllopmen~ Fund, (113) for FY 9~/~?
3, Facilities Construc~ion Fund (30~) for FY 9g/07
A, t~e~3NITY DEVE~OPM~3~T & KIi~R~AL fEltVl~S
(1) Staff rev~ev &nd recommendations relative to
Ordinance Si=SS, as a~4nded, also known ·s Victoria
Falls PUD which, accord~flg to ~h· required PUD
Report sutxul~tedby~heprolxrtyovner/agsnt0 ha· no~
commenced construction as defined in Section
of tbs Collier County I4~d Development Cods resulting
in several possible cours·s o! action for the Board
of County Coes~ssioners to co~sidsr.
(2) Staff revie~ and reco~mendations rslativt to
Ordinance 91-*S, as amended, also known as Radio
Square PUD which, according to the required PUD
Status Report submitted by the property owner/agent,
has no% commenced construction ss defined in Section
2.?.3.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code,
r~sulting in several possible courses of action for
the Board of County Comissioners to consider.
(3) Staff review and recommendations relative to
Ordinance 92-4, as amended, also known as The Nsc·ks
PUD which, according to the required PUD Status
Report sub~itted by the property owner/asset, has not
commenced constructicn ·s defined.in Section 2.7.3.4
of the Collier County Land Development Code,
resulting in several possible courses of action for
the Board of County Commissioners to consider.
(4) County support of the proposal by the Florid· Game &
Fresh Water Fish Commission to post shorebird
pro~ection areas near Tiger~ail park.
(5) Recommendation Co waive the security for Excavation
Permit ~o. 59.244 "Florida Spor~a Park Lake" located
in Sec. 14, 750S, R26E. (Con~inued ~rom the meeting
of 3/25/9?)
(1} Report to the Board on the st·tuB of the County-wide
Signal System Contract and on-going problems and
research for traffic management improvements within
Collier County.
(2) Adopt · Resolution authorizing the County Man·gar to
enter into a Landscape Maintenance Memorandum of
Agreement with the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) for landscaping ·nd irrigation
located on · portion of State Highway 84 (Davis
Boulevard).
(3) Status report on odor control at SCRWTP.
D. SUPPORT SERVICES
~. CO'ONTYMANAGER
2
April 1, 1997
9 · ~NTY ATTO~h'EY' ·
A. Select,on o~ f~nal~m~m (ex~e~a~ c~d~da~) ~o
in~e~le~d ~or ~n~y ~nager ~mi~lon.
B. P~sen~a~lon ~ Clarence S. Tears, ~r,, DIreC~Or Of Big
~reso B&oin Board, for Wa~er Restriction ~lnance.
(~issioner ~c' Xle)
C. Ap~in~men~ of me. rs ~o ~he X~okalee En~e~rise Zone
~velopmen~ Agency,
Re~es~ f~ H~ard g. Rice, ~arco Xola~d Lions Cl~ ~o
waive I~S ~l~ fee ~or nonp~i~ ~l~ me.Ace
o~aniza~ion, (C~, ~orrAs)
11. ~R ~N~TX~O~
PUBLIC KIARINOS WILL BE KEAAD IHMKDLATELY FOLLOWLNO ·TAFP ~
16.
All -~tttors listed under this lien ars considered to be routine
lad action will be taken bF one ~otion without separate
discussion of each lt~. If discussion is desired by · ~tmber of
the Board, that item(s) will bo re~ovsd from tho Consent Agenda
and considered aaparitel¥.
A. CONli'Ol~ DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMI~qTAL SErViCES
(1) Recommendation to approve affairs hauling of excess
material under Excavation Permit No. $9.597, "Naples
Dodge" located in Sec. 11, T49S, R25E, bounded on the
north end west by lots zoned I/Ind. (Pine Ridge
Indus=rial Park), on the south by PUD (Pine Air
Lakes) end on the ers= by Airport-Pulling Road.
(2) Recommendation to approve Lien Resolution for Code
Enforcement Case No. 6060~-049; owner of record
Beulah Nee Coleman.
3
April 1, 1997
(3} Reco~mendation approve for recording the final plat
of "Pelican Bay Bend'.
(4) Recommendation to grant final acceptance of the
' rosd~ay, drainage, water, and se~er l~ro~ments for
the f~nal plat of 'Timber Ridge Unit Two'.
Water facilities acceptance for Temple Shalo~.
Water facilities acceptance for Bt. ~eorqe One, Phase
II.
Water facilities acceptance for L~lique et The
Vineyards.
Approve a construction ~reement ~ith Naples National
Oolf Club for access i,~rovemente with C.R. 951 Four
I, aning Improvements, Bid No.
Recommendation to approve the acquisition of the NaIL
property to meet South Florida
District permit mitigation requirements for the
~aples Landfill.
Reco~mendation to accept surety bonds submitted
pursuant to con~ract
D. SUPPORT SERV~CE~
(2)
(2)
Recoev~endat£on to award Surplus Bid #S97-2648 for two
(2) surplus generators.
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners
approve and execute the Satisfactions of Notice of
Promise to pay and agreement to extend pa~ment of
~ster and/or Sewer System Impac~ Fees.
(:))
Recommends=ion tha~ the Board of County Commissioners
authorize the Chairman to execute Satisfaction of
Lien documents filed against real property for
abatement of nuisance and direct the Clerk of Courts
record same in the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners
authorize the Chairman to execute Satilfaction of
Lien documents filed ~gainst real property for
abatement of nuisance and direct ~he Clerk of Courts
record same tn the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida.
(S)
Request that the Board approve an engine module
overhaul and designate T~rbo~eca Engine Corporation
as the Bole source vendor.
(2)
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners
approve a Budget ~mendment for the rental of portable
pumps and authorize an increase to the contract wi~h
Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson. P.A.
(2) Budget Amendment Report.
April 1, 1997
Office, ~~ ~PROV~,
il) Rec~nd ~ ~he Boa~ ol ~nty ~losionero
oe~e mo ~he l~al c~lnm~lng ~i~ o~ gove~n~ in
the 8~mCe of Florl~'w ~pmr~MnC o~ ~lCy
(1) Rec~enda~on ~ha~ ~he Board ot ~cy ~llionero
co~ltder for approval a Ic~ula~e~ leC~lemen~
agreamen~ ~tveen Florida ~par~men~ of ~vl~nmen~al
Protection and Collier Co~2, Florida, for ~he
pu~se of se~lin~ ~ Case ~o. ~-5~ORP, ~herein
~he Coun~ has challenged pro~aed adoption of a ~le
~ha~ ~uld appl~ a w~er vessel 'slo~ e~ed' zone
throu~hou~ R~ke~
April 1, 1997
CONTI~UI TO &/8/97 II:E~NI~I IT]~( 16(&)(?)- WATER FACILITIES
ACCEPTANCE FOR LALIQUE AT THE VINEYARDS. (STAFF'S REQUEST).
PR OCL~MA TIOIV
Master Gardener volunteers are an tntegral part of Collier County Government;
and
I~tIEREAS,
the Collier County Master Gardener program offers opportunities for clttzens
who wish to volunteer in a vartety of different ways; includtng plant clinics,
garden workshops, recycling garden demonstrations, authoring articles for the
newspaper's garden pages; and
F,'HE~, Master Gardener volunteerlsm results in the resolution of over 3,000problems
for ctttzens of the community; and
N~tIERF_.AS,
last year Master Gardener volunteers contributed in excess ofl, 800 hours Of
service tn the plant clinic alone, or the equivalent of one full-time employee; and
~tlEREAS,
last year Master Gardener volunteers contributed over $21,000 tn services to
Collier County Government; and
our community has as one of its major attributes the lushness of its horticulture;
and
without volunteer services of Master Gardeners, the quality of our community
wouM be greatly reduced.
NOtV THEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County, Florida. that extreme gratitude and appreciation is extended to all the
Master Gardener volunteers who give of their time and energies to Collier
County Government. We, the Board of Collier County Commissioners do affirm
our commitment to the Master Gardener program and value our partnership
with the University of Florida in brtnging these special opportunities to our
residents and visitors, and therefore proclaim March 30 - ,4pril $ as
MASTER GARDENER APPRECIATION ;WEEK
DONE AND ORDERED THIS 1st Day of,4pril, 1997.
BO,4RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDa4
DY/IGHT K BROCK, CLERK
T MOTH¥ L. L NCOCX, AtC ,r - !
NrHERE4S,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WIIERF. AS,
PROCLAMATION
The Conservancy of Southwest Florida is the region '$ leading non-profit
environmental organization: and
The Conservancy ha~ helped protect nearly $00.000 acres of environmentally
sensitive land in its 33 year history ar an advocate far the environment; and
more than $,$00 members xupport The Conservancy of Southwest Florida: and
The Conservancy now includes: an Environmental Protection Division; the
Briggs and Naples Nature Centers; the Wildlife Rehabilitation Center; th~
Nature Discovery Center Museum; an Environmental Education Dlvtrion; a
Nature Store and the Upscale Resale Shoppe; and
The Conservancy '~ work in envlronmental protection tncludes working with the
Flortda Department of Environmental Protection to a~slst in the acquisition of
environmentally ~ensitive lands in South Florlda; and
The Conservancy'~ Sea Turtle Rescue Project, now entering tts l Sth year, hat
helped protect more than 80, 000 hatchlings from natural and man.made
hazards; and
WHEREAS, The
7tEREAS,
a rpectal horpltalfor native
animals each year; and
docents,
givers, ~peciai
o. ce tpers
business
t$7tEREAS, to The
WHERF_.AS,
pertov~
durtng that time
NOIF THEREFORE, be it proclaimea Comml.trtoner$ of Collier
County, Florida, that the month of ~4pr~l, 1997 be designated . A., ... '......~ -
CONSERVANCY VOLUNI'EER MONTH I
DONE AND ORDERED THIS 1st Day of ~pril, 1997, I"
BOARD OF C00N77'
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIEISIONERE
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
April 1, 1997
CLERK'8 REPORT
AnaJyall of Change~ to Relewll for Co~tlngen~let
General Fund (001) fro' FY 96/97
Community Development Fund (113) for g~/97
Facilltlel Conltructlon Fund (301) for FY 96/97
APR - 1 1997
ANALYBII OF CHANGES TO GENERAL FUND (001)
R~ERVE FC~ CONTINGENaES
Far Ihe mMeng cM. d AFl 1.1ge7
m.A.
11-27-e6
48
EXPLANATION OF REDUCTIC)N8
$
$
4.675,900
5,816,419
1.14Q519
(16,50000)
12-11-M
64 To pay Ln~ty mpmme fm k~,mkMN Chid Cm.e Centre
(11,000.00)
12-11-ge
68 To mpelr ~'~e CenlrM L~ Ch4er
(14.47S, 00)
12-31-96
1-22-g?
t10
119
R_,~__~_,~_ ~armf~ to Road and Br~;~ ~to ~1
revenue mceiv~ fm roadway =w~,~g and mowing.
To execu~ Ihe FMr Labor SIm~lerd~ Act eetlleme~ ~grNment
m~d rMe, mmt w~h pMntlf~ no ~ emp~yed by EM S.
To mcog~ze ~ fore.rd and reduce required
budget re~e~'~e~.
41,300.00
(42,770.00)
1-31-97
143 To p.x=#d ~ Tax Deed Al~i~t~nt fo~ delinquent
lax~ for 1~94 tax
2-11-g7
183 To fund g~in eharlng wwmd. as approved by BCC 12-17-g6
3-17-97
187
To fund em~gency repairs to the Im("r~lullN Jail. Naple= Jail
and building K ice n'mchiM.
202 To pay the co~t of hk~g m new County Admint~Vatc~.
(12.50000)
~ments M~dng to ~ th~n
$10,000 each: (No.: 2~, 17. e6. 69, S1,161,162,)
Total R educ'dor~
APR - 997
ANAd. Y$1S OF CHANGEB TO COMMUNITY Dr%'ELOPMENT FUND (t ¶3)
REIIERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES:
Ottgin.I Buclg.t ~ 0.'01~g6
Cuffent B~i.nce 3/21/97'
~educllont) or Incr~ ~ .~:~l~tnecl t~low
B~.
Date Request
1-22-97
RF.~ERVE FOR CONTINGENCIE~
Fo~l~ rn#~g ~Ap4 1, 1997
FY 1l~447
EXPLANATION OF R,EDUCTION~
Expl~natton
112 Fund~ pro,/~cled by exce~ cmty fonq~rd
$ 4e5,200
Total Reductiont
N:~dtNn~xm 113_~4~I
II0o~
APR - 1 Igg7
ANALYS~ OF CHANQE~ TO FACfl.mFJ CONSTRUCTION FUND (:301)
REIERV~ FOR CONTINOENCIEI
FY t~447
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES:
~ Bdlnce
(R~k)m) o~ Incr~ m ~d
Request
2-11-07
2-24-07
3-5-97
148
EXPLANATION OF REDUCTIONS,
ExplanaUon
Addrdm c~rry forwi'd kl needed fo~ ongoing projects
997.
not ne.deal fo~ ~ Reb'ofJte, rltumed
Fund~ needed t~ co~r the cost ~f prof~itonll
ll,~d~clping for E#t 41.
Amendments Imouflt~g to It$~ than
$10,000 each: (No.: 25)
$ 294,400.00
I~33,733~09.
15,000
(32,000)
$
(2,2Ol)
Total rlduc~
$ 239.333
EXECUTIVE SUMM~RY
~BTAFF REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATIVE TO ORDINANCE 9t-~6, AS
ANENDED, ALSO KNOWN AS VlC~rORIA FAILS PUD, WHICH, ACCORDING TO THE
REQUIRED PUD STATUS REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT,
HAS NOT COMMENCED CONSTRUCTION, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2.7.3.4 OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, RESULTING IN SEVERAL POSSIBLE
COURSES OF ACTION FOR THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO CONSIDER.
~ 8taft I~ requesting that the Board review staff's findings end
regarding the Victoda Falls PUD.
_CONSIDERATIONS: This PUD was originally approved on September 16, 1991. Section
2.7.3.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the project developer submit
an annual report on the progress of development, commencing on the fifth anniversary of the
PUD approval by the Board of County Commissionem. The singular purpose of this report is to
evaluate whether o? not the project his commenced in earnest in accordance with the criteria
~et forth in Section 2.7.3.4. For those PUDs approved prior to the effective date of adoption of
Ihs Land Development Code, the five year approval period commenced on the adoption date,
October 30, 1991. Therefore, the conditions set forth In Section 2.7.3.4. are applicable as of
October 30, 199~.
The above referenced PUD has been identified as a project which was approved prior to
October 30, 1991 and which has not commenced construction as defined in Section 2.7.3.4.
Staff has utilized the required PUD status (monitoring) report, supplemented by field observation
and review of in house records to redly the current status of the PUD and es the basis of a
recommendation to the Board consistent with the options provided in Section 2.7.3.4 (1) & (2).
Section 2.7.3.4 reads as follows:
Time iimlt~ for approved PUD masts? plans. In ~e event that s PUD
ma~ter plan la given approval, and the landowner(s) shall:
Fall to obtain approval for Improvement plans or & development order
for all Infrastructure Improvements to Include utilities, roads end
similar Improvements required by the epl~roved PUD master plan or
other development orders for et least 15 percent of the gross land
area of the PUD alta every five years o~ the date of approval by the
Board of County Commissioners; end
Fell to receive final local development orders for at least f $ percent of
I~e total number of approved dWelllng unlt~ In the PUD, or In the case
of PUD# consisting of nonresidential uses, 30 percent of the toMI
approved gross leasable floor area within ~e PUD every six years
the ~ of appmvel by ~e B~ of C~ Comml~lone~
-z- I APR 0 1
_ ~.~
The prelect developer shaft submit to the Planning Services D/rector
· status report on the progrs~a of development annually commencing
on the fifth anniversary date of the PUD approval by the Board of
County Commissioners. The singular purpose of the report wi'; b~ to
evaluate whether or not the project has commenced in e~r~',est In
accordance with the criteria set forth above.
Should the Planning Services Director determine that the
development has commenced In esrne~ then the land shall re. ~ln It~
existing PUD approval and shall not be subject to additional review
end consideretion of new development standards or use modification.
Should the Planning Services Direr;or determine that the
development has not =ommei,¢ed in earnest, then upon review snd
consideration of the report provided by the owner end any
supplemental Information that may be prevfded, the Board of County
Commissioners shall elect one of the following:
To extend the current PUD approval for a maximum period of two
years; st the end of which time, the owner will again submit to the
procedure as defined herein.
Require the owner to submit an amended PUD In which the
unimproved portions of the original PUD ·hall be consistent with the
grew'th management plan. The existing PUD ·hall remain In effect
until subsequent action by the Board on the submitted smendmenl~ of
the PUD.
ff the owner fails to submit an amended PUD within slx months of
board action to require such an amended submittal, then the Board
may Initiate proceedings to rezone the unimproved portions of the
original PUD to an appropriate zoning classification consistent with
the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan.
In the cas~ of Developments of Regional Impact, time limit restrictions
· hall be superseded by the phasing plan and/or time limits contained
within the application for development approval end approved ss pert
ore development order In conformance with F.S .~ 380.05.
Synoo~l~ of Aoomved Lanai IJse$; This 25.41 acre PUC ~s approved for 78 mul~fami~
~lling uni~. The gross density of ~e PUD is 3.0 ~lling u~i~ ~r
Consistency ~h Comomhenslve Gro~h Manaaem~nt Plan' ~e subJe~ PUD
designated U~an Coastal Fdnge on ~e Future Land Use Map of ~e GMP. The Densi~ Rating
System pm~des for a maximum densi~ in ~is area of 4 ~lling units per acm. ~e pmje~
~in ~e Traffic Congestion Ama, ~ich subtm~s I d~lling unit per a~e. Based on
m~ of ~e approved land uses, the PUD has been datelined to be consistent ~th
~llier Coun~ Gm~ Management Plan. The PUD is deemed ~nsistent ~t ~ ~,~
GMP Elements: F~m ~nd Use Element.
APR 0 1 1997
Consistency with the Collier Countv L~nd Deyelo;)ment C;<l~ The PUD has been
(ll~trlbuted to the ~pproprl~ta Ju~lictior~l review entries ~,i~lly for review of tt~ PUD for
=orml~ency v~th current I~nd development reguietlons.
lqSCAL IMPACT: A two year axtension of this PUD, Is recommended by It~ff w~l h~ve no
~ ~ on Collier County.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on a compmhensiva review of this PUD cloc~Jment, Staff
i~=ommendl that the Board of County Commissionem grant a two year extension to the Victoria
Flltl PUD.
~ PLANNER II
CURRENT PLANNING
z.,-. ~7
DATE
· z,.. ~' '~--~ '~ ~
~HERE, ~ ~u~,NAGER DATE
CURRENT PLANNING
DONALD W. ARNOLD, AICP, DIRECTOR DAI'E ~
PLANN~ SERVICES DE P,~/~3'MENT
VINCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMMUN~ DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
Iq JO ~JN~=T: ~ F~ PUD
-3-
APR011Sg7 !
L~
Z --J
AGEN
N~
APR 0
1997
THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE H~P.~IN
DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROH 'PUD# TO
~PUD', PLANNED WIT DZVELOPHENT, ~lO~ AS
VICTORIA FALLS PUD, FOR 76 NULTI-FAHZLY
D~LLING U~ITS, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH BIDE OF US-41 FAST AND ON ~l~ EAST
SIDE OF BAREF~ NZLLI~ ROAD, LYZNG ZN
SECTION 33, TO~I~SHIP S0 SOUTH, R~GE 26
EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING
OF 2 5 · 41 ACRES; ARD BY PROVID2NG AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Ifl~S, the Victoria Falls Planned Unit Development (I:~D),
which per~tts 157 dwelling units at a density of 6.18 unlts per
acre, has been found to bi inconaistent with ~ha Density Rating
System contained in the Futura Land Use Element of the GroUch
Nanagenent Plan~ ''
~REAS, the Collier County GroUch Planning Department
petitioned ~he Board of County Conlssionera to change the
zoning classification of the herein described real proper~y to
be consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Gro~h
~anagement Pla~;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COH~ISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA;
The Zoning Classification of the herein described real
property located in Section 33, Township 50 South, Range 26
East, Collier County, Florida, ia changed fron 'PUD' to 'PUD",
Planned Unit Development, in accordance with the PUD document
attached hereto as Exhibit #A# which ia incorporated herein and
by reference Bade part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas ~ap
Number 0633S, as described in Ordinance Number S2-2, is hereby
amended accordingly.
Ordinance ~u~ber 80-62, known as the Vlctorls Fells PUD,
&dopted on July 2g, lgl0 by ~e ~ of County C~Xss/one~ o~
Collier County, T~orid~, LB hereby repe~led Xn i~s en~Xre~y.
Th~s Ord~n~nc~ sh~ll btco~t ~fftc~lv~ upon rec~p~ of
~ission~ ~f Co, liar Co~y, Florida, ~is ~ day of
~arJo~ ~. Student
Assistant County Atto~e7
VI~ORI~ FA~ O~
BOMID OF COUNTY CO~HISSIO~
COLI~£R COUNTY, FLORIDA
PATRICIA ANNE GOODNIGHT~'
APR 0 1 1997
VX CTOP..TA FALLS
P~ I;IqXT DL"VZLOPICZ:NT
FOR
NULT Z - FA/CZ L¥
CONDOHZNZU'~ Dt¢XLLXN¢3 COICPLEX
PR,EPA.q,ED BY
WZT.~.,Z~ B.D, PAT'~Z~ON
P,Z"qtZSED S'EPTE24BER 16, 1~91
.BY COL.T.,.TER COUlq'Z"Y GROWTH
'APR 0 ! 1997~
ITAT2:2~'~FT OF ~~CE, , .......
eeleeee ~
eeee ~
eeeeeeeeeeeee ~
~?~LAW. .......... · ......
'APR 01 1997
STA?EHEI~ OF COHPLIAN¢£
Township S0 South, Range 26 East, o£ CollLer County, Florida,
&e 1:he Victoria Falll Planned Unit Developlent v~ll comply vith
the Collie~ County Grovth Kanagamant ~lln £orthe tailoring
The proposed land vii ii compatible vith the surrounding
2. The project ahallcomply ~lth ell applicable County. State
and Federal la~a regulating development of the property.
3. The pro, act w~ll be eer~ed by County approved potable
rater.
4. The pro, ecsc vii1 be served by an amoebae ValteWatar
S. & de-acceleration lane Il to be conltructad on U.S. 4~ to
eecondar~ road leading to entrance o£ propoaed
condoLtniunaite.
development orders ira requested for thl pro, eot.
The property ii located in the Urban Coastal Fringe Area
and the Traffic Co~gestion Area &a deel~nated on the
~ture Land Uae Hip and in the l~uture Land Uae Element of
the Grov~h Hanaqament Plan. The pro, act density at 3
contained In the Futura Land Usu Element. Interconnec~lon
vita adjacent propartiel ii not appropriate.
APR 0 1 1997'"".
PROPERTY OWNZRSI~XP .~D ~ESC~.XPTXOT!
214 ~n~ ~ve~ Nip,es. r~orlda.
The average elevation ~rithXn ~he property 18 4.~ ree~ above
uean sea level.
Scattered ouall tx-ees wAth OOBe palwet~oo.
Rock], oand¥ ooil.
APR 0 ! 1997'
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A p&rc·l of lind lying vithin Section 33, ?ovnship 50 South,
Range 26 E<, Collier County, Floridl, being Bore specifically
d··cr~bed ·· follovi:
Froa thl Iouthellt corner of Ilid Section 33, heir
89'53'49" Neet ·long th· South·fly Line of ·aid Section ·
Th·ace continue Nol~:h 19'$3°49" Neet il·ag
Section line · dietlnce of 1720.16 feet to the
Southveitirly corner of the Southeast quarter of I·ld
Section!
Thence North 09'59°22" Nest along slid Section line
diitlnci st 94.59 feet to the Kaltirly right-st-ray
line of Barefoot Nillia~e Hoed. Having · S0 foot
rlght-of-t~ay ·0 it presently ixietl!
Thence North 9'03°22" Wist ·long said Easterly
right-of-way line · distance of 158.~1 feet to ·
point of curvature of · circular curve concave to the
Neet having · radius of 760
Thincl No~'chirly ·long the arc of laid curve through
· centr]l angle of 28'28'07", · diet&ace of 3?7.62
feet to the Southeasterly rights·f-ray line of ·
proposed 60 feet wide road, and to the point of
tanqency of said cvrve~
Thence l~or~h 52'28'31~ East along'~aid Southeasterly
right-of-way line · distance of 207.99 feet to ·
point of curvature of · circular curve concave to the
Northwest having · radius of 1030.00 feet.
Thence Northtaetirly along the arc of said curve
through · central angle of 16'53'32", · distance of
303.67 feet ~o · point of tangency of said curve~
, Thence Nor~ch 35'34'$9~ East, · distance of
feet~
Thence South 5¢'25'01' East, parallel with end 400
... feet from the Southeasterly right-of-way line of U.S.
41 ae it presently exists, and a distance of 1804.32
feet to the POINT OF S£GINNXI~G.
Containing 25.41 acres, ~or· or lees.
Bearings aa senti·ned herein are baaed on the Boundary sap
prepared by Tri-¢ounty £ngineerinq, Xnc., Drawing Po. ¢-1439-1
and do not refer to true Beridian.
No.
APR 0 1 1997
D£VZLOPM£NT R£GULATIONS
1. Purpole= The purpose of this lection is to set forZh the
regulations for the development of the property covered by
~ll Planned Unit Development.
h~tted Ulel and St~c~ureiz No build~ or it~ctur~,
or ~ ~eriot, ihall be erected, altered or uied, or
land or rater uied, ~n vhole or ~n par~, for other ~ln
~e Eoll~lng ~
a. ~e~t~ed Principal Uses and S~c~ures.
3. ~X~B~ ~nsity - 76 units
a. ~p~h of s~ctu~s fr~u ~riueter ~a~ lanes -
. ~A~y-Flve (3S) fee~.
b. ~Amkance ~tveen o~c~ureo - l'f ~tre lo a
separation between any two (2) principal structures
on the same parcel, said separation shall be a
mLnLuun of thirty (30) feet.
c. In the case of clustered buildings with a common
architectural theme, these distances Bey be less
provided that a site plan is approved in accordance
with th~ site development plan req~lations in the
zoning ordinance in effect at the time of
application.
S. Mlni~u~ and Naximum Floor Area of'Principal
'(a) Nlnimu~ Floor Area -7SO equate feat
" "(bi Maximua Floor Area - None
6. Naximum Height of Structures:
a. Two (2) living floors above required flood elevation.
7. Minimum Landscaping Requirements:
Aa required in Section 8 of the Collier County Zoning
Ordinance 82-2, as amended.
8. Nlnimum Off-Street Parking:
a. Two (2) parking spaces per unit.
9. Water Supply: Potable water shall be supplied by service
from the existing County water Bain in the Bedlam strip of
U.S. 41 or supplied from an existing water line supplying
the Hitching Post Hoblle ~ome Park immediately west of
this Planned Unit Development.
10. Water Management: The water Banagement system shall
comply with the requirements of the South Florida Water
Management District and Collier County. The final water
eanaqement system design shall Be reviewed and approved
the County Engineer prior to the commencement of the
development.
fAPR 0 1 1997
11.
12.
~ 12.
Sanitary Sevag rovided
colle¢~£on and ~rea~uent eys~au shall bo
licable local and s~a~e recpjlrement~=~
com 1 wl~h all app .... lin preeen~
wes~ o~ this Planned ~n£~ Developuen~.
Road Xnproveuen~a~ The proposed nay Eoad connec~ing ~his
pro~lc~ ~o ~.S. A1 shall be couple~ed ind ivllll~lO ~o
trattic before iny cir~itici~el ot occupancy ire ~lSUld,
Xes lnte~eect£on vlth U.S. A1 shall be at an exietinq or
FDOT appFoved Be~ian opening.
Su~ec~ ~o F~T approval, the developer Ih&ll provide a
rl~h~ ~u~ ~eceleFa~ion lane, Xet~ tufa s~orage lane and a
ney aegean opening on ~.S.
~he ~eveloper B~all, at,er
~a Count2, ~pF~e an~ e~en~ ~Fet~ WAIIAans Road to
~e eas~e~edge of his prope~Y line.
Floo~ Elevation: Buildings shall ~a elevated ~o Bee~ ~e
Coun~2'o Flo~ ordinance ~ using rill trou the pcopose~
laXe o~ Mring in additional rXll ~o False ~e buildings to
~e Fevered ~1oo~ elevation st AE ?'.
,APR 0 1 1997
DEV~LOI:~L'~FT STAI~DARDS
~he purpose of thin section ~s ~o sa~ £or~h ~he e~andarda
for ~he developnant of the pro~ect.
All nscsssar~ saseuents, dedications, or o~her
~nstru~snts shall be qranted to Insure the continued
operation o£ all service utilities.
Sits Plan Approvail
shall be subnitted to and approved by the Collier ~un~y
Be ~n ha~on~ v~th ~e Varietal lnten~ and
p~ose of ~a do~en~. Such ~terlal ~ ~clude, bu~
~z not l~nl~ed to, s~te plans at an app~pr~a~e scale
shoo,nV proposed placenta2 of at~ures on
provisions for ~nqresa a~d eq~esa, parking areasf and
re,Ired yards and o~er open
Des~ an~ Operat~on~
~e pro~ec2 viii be a cond~ln~ apa~en2 conplex.
B. ~e desi~ o~ ~e apa~nen2 bu~ldinqs, landscapin9
and recreational facil~iee, as yell as ~e narke~ng
and adve~s~ng ~es, rill be d~cted
B~erate income vork~nq Fes~denks of Collier C~n~y.
c. ~ho conplex shall Include tvo bedroon
RtCFOIt~C~.i rnc~tleo shall ~ncludt a ch~ldren*s
play area, ~enn~s cou~ and shu~rleboa~ coups
conta~n~nq not less ~an 3/4 of an acre.
E. ~ldren shall be
),tTFUD?.2291
Mo. ~
APR 0 ! 1991
3
4
S
6
?
t
!
2.2
~-3
RESOLUTION gl'__--
A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COHHISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, PU~SUAIAT TO SECTION 2.7.3.4
OF THE COLLIER COUNTY lJ~
DEVELOI~(ENT CODE ~.FFECTING O~DINANC~
91-86 K~4OWN AS VICTORIA F~tLL$ PUD,
EXTENDING THE CU~NT PUD APPROV~ TO
APRIL 1, 1999; /~ND pROVIDING ~
EFFECTIVE DATE.
14
~s
20
2'1
2S
26
29
30
33
34
3S
3&
2l
39
4O
41
42
43
44
#aERY. AS, the Victoria Falls PUD, Ordinance 91-86 adopted on
September 16, 1991, is subject to the provisions of Section
2.7.3.4., of the Land DeVelOpment Code {LDC), Time Limits for
Approved PUD Zonin9 Districts together with their respective
Master Plans; and
WHEREAS, the PUD was adopted consistent with and under the
provisions of the Collier county Growth Managemen~ Plan; and
#HERF. AS, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the
PUD and has determined to extend the current PUD Ion~'~ for two
years, until April 1, 1999; and ~
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT P. ESOLVED, by the Board of Zoning
Appeals of Collier County, Florida that:
1. The above recitals are ado?ted herein by reference
as if fully set forth herein.
2. This Resolution shall constitute evidence of
compliance with the review requirements of Section
2.7.3.4 of ~he LDC.
3. Pursuan~ to said section o! the LDC, the current
PUD approval is hereby extended to April 1, 1999;
at the end of which time the owner shall submit to
the procedures in LDC Section 2.].3.4.
This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
approval.
BE IT FU~THE~ RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in
the minutes of this Board and in the records o! the Petition for
which the extension is granted.
-1-
APR 0 11997
This Resolution adopted sfter motion, second and ms~ority
vote.
Done this day of
4
S
?
10
11
~4
20
:~2
2S
..... , 199~.
BOARD OF COUNTT CCHHISSIO~-P~
COLLIER C(:~)I~I'Y, FLORIDA
ATTEST~
DMIGHT E. BROCK, CLEI~
~IMOTHY ~. IU~COCK, C14A. IMtAN
-2-
A(HN~k r'~M
No. ~
APR 0 1 199~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
STAFF REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATIVE TO ORDINANCE 91-66, A8
AMENDED, ALSO KNOWN AS RADIO SQUARE PUD, WHICH, ACCORDING TO THE
REQUIRED PUD STATUS REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT,
HAS NOT COMMENCED CONSTRUCTION, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2.7.3.4 OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, RESULTING IN SEVERAL POSSIBLE
COURSES OF ACTION FOR THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO CONSIDER.
~ Staff i~ requesting that the Board review staff's findings and recommendations
regarding the Radio Square PUD.
CONSIDERATIONS: This PUD was originally approved on October 8, 1991. Section 2.7.3.4 of
the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the project developer submit an annual
report on the progress of development, commencing on the fifth anniversary of the PUD
approval by the Board of County Commlssioner~. The singular purpose of this report is to
evaluate whether or not the project has commenced in earnest in accordance with the criteria
let forth in Section 2.7.3.4. For those PUDs approved prior to the effective date of adoption of
the Land Development Code, the five year approval period commenced on ~ adoption date,
October 30, 1991. Therefore, the conditions set forth in Section 2.7.3.4. are applicable as of
October :~0, 1996.
The above referenced PUD has been Identified as a project which was approved prior to
October 30, 1991 end which has not commenced construction as defined in Section 2.7.3.4.
Staff has utilized the required PUD status (monitoring) report, supplemented by field observation
and review of in house records to verify the currant status of the PUD and as the basis of a
recommendation to the Board consistent with the options provided in Section 2.7.3.4 (1) & (2).
Section 2.7.3.4 reads as follows:
d)
2.7.3.4.
Time llmlt~ for approved PUD master plans. In the event that a PUD
master plan is given approval, and the landowner(s) shall:
Fall to obtain approval for Improvement plans or a development order
for all Infrastructure Improvements to Include utilities, roads and
similar Improvements required by the approved PUD master plan or
other development orders for st least 15 percent of the gross land
area of the PUD site every five years of the date of approval by the
Board of County Commissioners; end
Fall to receive final local development orders for st least 15 percent of
the total number of approved dwelling units in the PUD, or in the case
of PUDs consisting of nonresidential uses, 30 percent of the total
approved gros~ leasable floor area within the PUD every slx year~
the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners.
APE 0 ! 1997
2.
The project devc,loper shall submit to the Planning Services DlrecT;~,r
sctatua report on the progress of development snnusily commencing
on the fifth anniversary date of the PUD approval by the Board of
County Commissioners. The singular purpose of the report will be to
evaluate whether or not the project has commenced In earnest In
accordance with the criteria set forth above.
Should the Planning Servicss Dlrec-;or determine that the
development ha= commenced In earnest, then the land shall retain Its
existing PUD approval and shall not be subject to additional review
and consideration of nsw development standards or use modification.
Should the Planning Services Director determine that the
development has not commenced In earnest, then upon review and
consideration of the report provided by the owner and any
supplemental Information that may be provided, the Board of County
Commissioners shall elect one of the following:
To extend the current PUD approval for · maximum period of two
years; at the end of which time, the owner will again submit to the
procedure as defined herein.
Require the owner to submit an amended PUD In which the
unimproved portions of the original PUD shall be consistent with the
growth management plan. The existing PUD shall remain in effect
until subsequent action by the Board on the submitted amendment of
the PUD.
ff the owner fails to submit an amended PUD within slx months of
board action to require such an amended submittal, then the Board
may Initiate proceedings to rezone the unimproved portions of the
original PUD to an appropriate zoning classification consistent with
the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan.
In the cass of Developments of Regional Impact, t/ms limit restrictions
shall be superseded by the phasing plan and/or time limits contained
within the application for development approval and approved as part
ora development order in conformance with F.S. :~ 380.06.
-2-
NO.
APR 0 1 1997
I~,,~t~sla ~f A~orov~d Land
perk u~es.
This 9.4 mca PUD w~s ~pproved for indust~ mid
Ggnelst~ncv with Comprehensive Growth Manmaement Plmm Based on =~ff ~ ~ ~
~ ~nd u~s, ~e PUD ~s ~n dlte~ln~ to ~ consls~nt ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~gement ~an. ~i~ PUD ~s deemed ~nsistent ~use ~ is ~n e~nsl~ ~
~1. ~ PUD is d~m~ ~nsistent ~ ~e foiling GMP E~n~: F~ ~ U~
~_-,.qaistencv with the Collier County I.~nd Dtvelooment C~e: ~ PUD ~ ~n
~~ ~ ~ ~ppmpd.te Judsdi~on~l m~ enUUes ~~lly for m~ ~ ~ ~D ~
~s~n~ ~ ~ent ~nd develop~nt mgul.~ons. ~sed on ~at m~. ~ f~
~~s ~ ~n ~en~fied:
Planning: Umited archit, lctural standards. The architectural standards of the LDC apply to
commerc~l components of PUDs. Since this is an industrial PUD, the etandlrd$ would not
apply, even Ittough them are permitted uses such as professional office, financial institutions,
end medical offices.
Note: A Preliminary Subdivision Plat was approved by the Collier County Planning Commission
of~ March 6, 1997 which reconfigured lot size and shapes within the Radio Square PUD.
FISCAL IMPACT: An extension of this PUD, as recommended by staff will have no fiscal
impact orl Collier County.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on · comprehensive review of this PUD document, S,afl
,~quam PUD, w~ tt~e cor~rtfofl mat ~e erch~ecturat ~andam's of~ 2.8 ofa'~e LDC sttal'
-3-
APE 0 ! 1997
FRE~HL, PLANNER
CURREI~r PLANNING
s.,/.9 7
DATE
I~OBIERT J. MULHERE, AICP, MANAGER
CURRENT PLANNING
3,-- &
DATE
DATE
DONALD W. ARNOLD, AICP, DIRECTOR
~,1 ~N ~RVICES DE~PARTMENT~ ~:::~
VINCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
PUO SUN,~"T: Radio 8qu~m PUD
-4-
APR 0 1 1997
APR 0 1
ORDINA~C£ NO. ti- 9~ .
AN ORDINANCE AKENDING ORDINANCE NUHBER
CO~Y, ~RIDA BY ~NG ~E O~ICZ~
~ONING AT~S ~P ~ 0S01N~ BY
~G~NG ~E ~ONING ~SSZ~TZON OF
~IN DES~IBED ~ PROP~ ~OH
~O aP~" P~ED ~IT D~P~ ~0~ ..
~ ~IO SGU~ P~ ~R A B~SIN~S
~OR PROP~TY '~T~ AT ~
C.R. 856) ~ ~A ~, ~
~E~ION 1, ~SHZP SO S)U~, ~GE 25
CONSISTING OF 9.4 A~; ~D BY
~ E~E~ DATE.
'" WHEREAS, Rober~ L. Duane of Role, l~ontes & Associates,
Inc., representing Earl L. & Shirley A. Frye, petitioned the
Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning
classification of the herein described real proper~y;
'.-',. ".'..;':'i~ .'NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County
~"::-.';'~..:~'property located in Section 1,' Tovnenlp 50 Sou~n, aange ~
'~ ,," ",'~% East - .Collier County, Florlda,~s changed from A-2 to 'PUD
'. ' ,..-...'. Planned Unit Development in accordance with the Radio Square
· ':f VPUD document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorPorated
"by reference herein. The Offic'~al Zoning Atlas ]~ap Number
"' :':~'~'lN,"ee described in Ordinance Number.82-2, is hereby
emended accordingly.
T~is Ordinance aha11 ~ecome effective upon receipt of
~otice from 'the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has
been filed vith the Secretary of S~ate.
-1-
NO, ~
APR 0 1 199{
I'"-
... ,,:'.:-::! ?.: .....:...... ·
· ,, .~'. ,.: :.....,:~,'~ .'.,... ~.-.~ ........ .
· ...... ; ,.~ ..,. , .. . RADIOSQU, K.~I'UD
' .-:':,?,,~-~..-.' ~: , :... ..,. ~ .
:'i .".;.'.'-~;~'Y."-'.' ~ ,.'.': '
'..' . )'.'i"..'. ='.' · Prepared For:
::. :: :. (.;' ·: . ,..., ..
~?.:.":~'~' "~.' "ii ".'..' '.. · ' ... ¢O!~_r~A ¢OUN'I'Y PLANNING SERVICES
':,~'~.~.',~j !.:,;~-:.~'.;! :' .'[ .-..!.'..~ · .' .?:, 2S00 North Horseshoe ~
~? ':.-~-..~;.-.~ ,~ .; .,,... - ...,....,j~.... ~,.;, ,:.".- ....... ~. , .
'~5.~4~.. ~-,~....r,.-...~ ...~...,., ,_ ..~ ~, -.- : . . ....
:f-;~,_"'.4'~ -Z'~;';,~,'i--'*".' ',': :'.: ~ ,;.'."'~."',-~: :. '. '.'"' .. - · '
~-~ ~i~ ~.,.'.'-'. :.-,.'~..-'.'. -'. ~."':'.=' .: .:'. ' - ' - - '
· ',¥~-'~ ~ .........~'..-%~r?.- .. ~..,...'. · .....,... ,~,,,~. ~j:...... , .
'~ ,~:~,,/~..~:.:.:'..:.~.~-...-.. ,. ~.:,.:I-IOLE, l~Oh'Tr=S & A.~~, INC.
.~. ,r,~.~;.~;,,,, ,..,.~:.....;.=-,-;..~,.....=, .,,:...~..~. = :....., . .
· ~,~;,~,.~.-,_,:,~.~.~ :., o.;: .-. =.. : .-..~ ...... ?15 Tenth Street South
:.-F.,.r',,:: .~:',~> -.',,:. ':..~ "=- -.' ..'..'.. "-. ·Nap]es, ~or~da 33~40
· ~,.~, ..~.,,~ ~., .¢,,.,~.-,,,:: 4..... ..... . . . .
~,"~ , ,,~-"~'-.~'~.,~.. ,= ~.,- ....... · >-..-' ~, . .' (8133 262-4~1'/ .
· ..'F~"~,tt'.~ 4..'~':'.~..~!~"r' "', .'~:.' ."..~ ' . .... .. ~"' · ' · ~ - - '
"~,ff-.'~-:' C.."~_:;*".' "F' :'.' .. ',-.~' ." .'.'.' ' ' .
""!b:'~;; i'..'. ~?;'/t~.": . ['..' 'f' ' '.' '.- '
J'k": .Y ~:~:.'.'~;-'.:' ~':' · "' '.: HI~ Fflc No. ~0.80 ':
.~.)~.::~ ~f~,,¥;,'g.-' -: .... :.... . . .
~.._:".~' '~ ~,'~'."S, '~* -' ~ . · ' " ' '
, :..
· ! for
Date lr~ed: March 21.1~9_1
Date Reviewed By
CCP~ September 19. 1~1
Da~e Appr~d By
October 8. 1~1
~endm~nls & Repeah
No. ~
APR 0 1 1997
TA.~I~: OF CO~
SECTION I
b'TA~ OF COM~'LIANCE · ~
SECTION Il
PROPERTY oWNERsHIP, LEGAL DESCRIFTION AN'D SHORT TrrLE ..
SECTION ITl
STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PRO)ECT DESCRIlrrION ............
SECTION IV
GENERAL DEVELOPM~:2~rr REGULATIONS ' · ....
· ..._ .~. ~ SECTION V ..
· ,~ .' . .,..:,.~,:.::.:: , .
· -'.. :-.:.?.:.-. :. ENV]:RO~'TAL STANDARDS ...............................
· l .' . ~"-'..'~:~-"~" '"'" '." '.."', ';';, ,'. '"'''.~""
'".:' · ~ ":."~:";~: "~;;."';'"~" :'¢'"'! .... ' ': :- " '
':'-:' .'..'.: ";.:; t.-'i ::i': TRA.NSP..0.,RTAT~ON R.EQ~N'~
:!.'. ~'c .....-.~'-,:~'.~ ,:-;';~,'.--?:',..:...'~-'.'~ ..j . ,...' · '
· SECTION VII ': :.'.,'.'(; ,~." '
· - ' ' .'~:.'%::t~' '.,';??,'~ ' 5" '. :'.'"..: ·
: "' '":.':'.'!:"~UTE,n'IF,,S'RE(2t.rIRE~,fE?~"rS ................................... 1
SECTION VrlI
'- SECTION IX
'.,. ' SUBDrV'ISION EXCEPTIONS ..... · ..............................
LIST OF IDfliiBITS
ATTACHMENT A - CONCEPTUAL PUD MASTER I)LAN
ATTACHMENT B - LEGAL DESCRIPTION
APR 0 1 lCJg7
BOX3~ OT COUNTY COKHISSZONI~IS
CO~.T-TZR coulr~, FLOIt3DA
BYt~
P~TP. ICIA A,qHE GOOD~tlGlfr,
AJ4~ LEGAL S~f73:CXI34CY
°%*.
!. ;: '...~:, · .
end ecl,.,m~edg~Mnt of ~
-2-
NO. ~
APR 0 1 1997
SECTION I
STATEMENT OF COIvfl'LIAN~
· The dcvclol~nent of this l~'O]ea wS21 be
of Co. ct County ss set forth In th~. Growth. L4ans~ment lqsn. *l'Ms con~lhn~ includes:
· .i. The subject prop~rt7 is J~ated 2n an tru Identtikd as Urban in the Growth
· .... Mana~ment Plan for Collier County. .;
'.. Growth ~nn~mcnt Plan.
.:.: 3.
· ..... thc CountT.
:. "~ :: '. · ' tracu, the placement of land us~ buffer~ Md Iht proposed development
'""' ":":'~ .. ,.~. :,,..:' ]VIannSement ?lan penal~ to the ~ o! la~d uses. Speci~ca]ly, the pmlx~ proj
:' L: · Th~- rcq.¢s~¢d re-'r~nin~ ~ In 0~¢ form of · PUD as rcquirtd.
: ' b. iT he pwp~s'ed sit~'h not .spot industrial' and it a. djacen~ to cxis6n~ land zoned
c. The propolld' ~lev~iopment is compare'hie wl~ ,djacenl land uses in general
Specific development standards and limltntbns on
Section IV G¢~.¢ral Development Requirements to er~ur~ compare'it7
exist/nj non-industrial rypc uses loc~tcd alo~j Donna Strcct east of thc project.
.o.
APR 0 1 1997
f--.-
.. SECTION
· '., '::, i". ).-' ." definitions set forth in Collier C~unty ~ Otdissn~ in tff~t at t~ ~ o
· .' ; ' .'[': ' bu~dtn~ permit'applf.cation.
'..' ":"C, ',A~I c~n'ditio~ tmposed and all ~phi~ ~t~l ~ ~i ~ ~
" "Sovcm ~e m~ncr h w~ ~h site ~ ~ ~
D. R not s~ ~t fo~h or pr~d~ [~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P~= of ·
~llicr ~un~ ~ Or~n~ ~ ~ ~ s~ a~.
3.4 S~ ~~O ~ DRA~A~
Oeadnl, grading, ennh~r~ and iile drainage ~rk s~H ~ ~o~ed in n~rdanl
~lh applicable Collier Cot~n~ C~es and ~i~nces nd the stnndnr~ ~
APR 0 1 1997
//
commitments o! this document '.~t thc time of co~truaion plans approval
3.5 EASF_MENT8 FOR UTT'L.rrlF..5
:: ~c~munucu ~p,c,,. ........ L. ---- ~ t~Lta amd ~t
~ ". ' i~ ?~' .~e ~r~siom of Scion 10~ of ac Zo~g O~inan~ shall app~ to
f?'" .~.;}~J;~'bf a~platled ~ac~, 0r parceh of lan~ ~ pro~dcd ~.sald Section
~'.."~'::. ~e tea ~ated ~ I detengon area on AtroVent 'A' sh~
' ~:~ ~'.~p~ thereof ma~ be ~mlm~cd ~ sha~~ dcprculom for ~ter ~lcntion pu~
' '..;..',~ lon~ ~ ~ meet thc ~um ~qutrcmcnu for ~t and d~ retention
' ~' ". ic~rdance ~ ~u'h ~odda Walcr Mana8ement Di~ ~teH~ Such are~
· ~ ~d shfll~ dep~iom sh~ ~ ~ ~e ~e ~ne~l ~nfl~gon and contain
~ addition t0 ~e ~gom a~ ~d s~c ~t~ sh~ in At~chment '~, easemen
APR 0 1 1997
3.8 SUNSL:'T AND ),ION1TQJ~ING. PRO%risIONS
Radio Square ~PUD sh~ b~ required to stbide by any p~io~ in the Unified ~nd
~lopment ~e ~ to suma~nj ~d monitoflng ~ scheduled for adoption
~ ~e F~ of 1~1.
APR 0 2 1B~7
S~ECI'ION IV
· "..'. '-"';-.-'.~:.Therc trc ten'tracu of land pla'~cd for'dc~,c]°pment wkhin this PUD. The full rLn~e
· - ': '~ '~ ~cs~ o~ce uses, wuchouse and dtstn'budon facPkles, including other land usc~ which
: '.: .' O~ Tract l, a n~t'dznum floo~, irea r~fio of.35 for'office uses t~ peT~Tt~ed tn ac~orda~c~
'" ': ~.w~th the prov~sfon3 set forth in Section IV, Subsection 4.4't)f th~s PUD doc~nent. Tract
· . :. .~ .' c'..2 to 10 vn'lJ a]]ow a n3axiznum floor arel r~t[o of .45 for ~ uses.. Propcrt~ is projected · . .~-. '??.o be dcvclopcd over a ten y~ar period or as n~ntket condi[bns dictate.
· ~ 4.4 USES PERMITTED
."" :No building or str~cture, or pan thereof, sh~ll be erected, altered or used, or land used,
· ....'..in whole or p.irt, for other than the follow~ng:
'"' A. PHnc~_~nl UsC]
1. Corporate headq~3ar~crs;
2. Assembling, packaging, nnd fabrknting epcrations c, nly w~thin full)' enclosed
str~c,'~rcs;
6
APR 0 1 1997
I~.
3. ]Fiaanc~l institutions;
enclosed structta'es;.
· . ,.. 5.
".i' ' ,*' .'::'. '~ '.....':" 6, ' Medical laboratories, c1~c3, treatment t~c~t~ Led rascal, ch and
· '.:.-';*.~ ..~') '.:: ~. ceate~; .
,., :,.;.. ';..:. '~. :;,~ . , . ....
· ~ .'..* o.'.'. · . '. .... .: ~ · . % . .o
., · ;~..'..- .~.'~..,~,~; '. ;. . *. .
· '~" & Wazchotub~. wholcsatin& stomp and dtstrttmtion facQiflfl, inciuc~
' """' ; Comparable ~ on~ within fuay enclosed
" -.'-' 9. ']~u~cts and professional officcs~ ban~ financial tmtftuffom;
"..'· -";/'"..' ~0. McdJcal'l~boramrics; mL'~ical ciistcs;, mcdic3] office= fo~ human~;
· '...,~ .." ~;.'.;..;~/..; ,:, ..:.?'.~ ;,.-. .........
· -~'."..'. -.....~.-..~/ *~ ..~.....',..o... o .. · ; ... ..' ...../ o -
· ':';'. ~.,~:!'.~'.~.:'.2;~'i'~',,~ ~;2"..:'t,4.~.'~.'.~..~ ':".:~ '~;?' ~. '..' y .' ' '.
· -.,,, .. -...." .~., ~:o~G*~..' ~ ~',~.'~,~ ~.~ '.~.'..,-. ',. '-.~ . . '. :.'. '.. ' · · · '
.,,.... ~... .....o~,... . . ~ .... ,, . .. -. ~ . ,..~ ....~. · . .. ....
o~"~-' ~,~ .~ :-r:,: .~. ,'-' .. l.~, ., ClllJd ~1'~ ~t~l~ . ;~,:'.' .~.. ., -,.... ·
''L'"',<':.~?..";"..--."~;,~.-..~,.,~.~,~,~.-~_~, ~... ,~/"~:r?~"..-' · '... .. '
'%~o .~:¥. '... ~o'.o*.~.-.. , ..~ io. o. *'~ - o...%~..o · . -'o.? · · : .
"'. :. : . :")'? ~-' ,."'.~/B:. ~ :..: ?..?:... ~r~,r,..~,., .. .. , . ~....-...
:~: ;'?."?:z.:if.?/..'?,.'.?~-~:'~.~.:~'*.':?::z.'.~.`:'~'~''~?{.':5 :" .? . ' '
': . '.' - . ~-. · ..' 1. '~ '$¢rvl~ mablt~hn~¢na mmrlnI m commcm ~d ind~t~q
F~, . .~ .'-..: ....> :~; .,. , ...-~.% ..~...~.~...~.o.... . . , · .
;,~.:_.. ,'.~.o.~)..'':'.'- ,~..~.~.,~, .~'o.~ .. . ~.... ... '.....-/
2..Rcc~eauonal ~m~'~ cluld ca:e ~nten, and ru~am~nr3 r,aflable for m~ by
.. · '. employees of businesses located within the .;~tted or accessory use
." buildings of tl~ PUl), ' ' - ·
· . . . :3. ' Rcta~ sa]cs and/or clispla~ izcas as accessory to the principal me, not to'
exceed an area ~reater than lO~ of thc ~ floor area of the permitted
principal use; · -
4. Any other commercial mc or professional service w~ich ts comparable in
nature ,~tth the foregoing us~s and which the County lVfanager, or tt~ designee,
dctemtfnes to be comparable to and compat~le wig tl!e foregoing uses.
C.. Development Standards - Tracts 2 - l0
1. l~nlmum Setback Ecouirements from Pro,ertl_ Lf~es and'Tract
Exccm that Setbacks for Tracts 2 and 3 shall be Measured from the
EdGe of the Landsca~ BufFer
? &G£~
: APR 0 11997'
:.
a. Front Yard - Twenty-five (2.~) feet.
b, Side Yard. Ten (10) fcek except that no side yard shall be lets than fif~
(50) feet from. any ab~tttng ruidenthl]y :toned Jot.
c. l~ear Yard * Ftt'teen (15) feet, e:~cept that no rear yard shall be Jets than
" fth7 (50) feet ~ any atmtt~g reskientlally zoned Jot.
· . " a. ]~L_,,~m Jot ~dth. One hundred (100) feet.
One thousand (1,000) ~u~e feet. '
4. Off-stre~t Par~l~_~ Reo_u~remen~
· .... . .....' ,A~.rec~u.tred by the CoRiet County Z~p. ifl[ Ordinance.
:'. -; .". -.' '.,L-:; ~. ' "-...':' TWO stories er twcnty-flv~ feet (25) feet, howcycr, Tracts 3, 4, ? and 8
· ' :' '- "- '· ^ twcnw, l~c (2~) f~ot ~uffer shad be reclutred a~ons the entire eastern edit
· ,..;::;;: : '.- LLotthepro, lect in accordance ~th the mndar~ of the co~cr county ZoninA
",,'":;~". i'!~.': 'i',Ord'.manc~. The landscape buffer alonj thc eastern edit of thc project shaJJ
. . .1.'.." ' De planted prior to the iuuance o[ any certificateS o~ occupancy [or structur~
: ·' and shad be a SfLZC and type which ~ in.lure meetin8 an elahty (80) percent
opacity end ma~ure he,Sbt o! six (~) feet w~thin twelve (12) months of the date
As requL~ed by the Collier County $J~n Offence.
~. C~ut$|de Stor~_e and Repa|r '
~qo outside storage or rcpak of products shall be nllowed on nny trnc~s.
,I APR Ol lgg7
10. L~ad[ne and Unloadin~
11.
No lo·ding a.nd unloading to the tear of buildings abutting residential uses
along the cs·tern property line. Loadinl and unloading sh,II not occur before
'/:00 Lin. or after ;'/:00 p.m.I.,oadlng and unloading will only be permitted
l[rom truck onto loading platforms within enclosed s~res.
Ail warehouse, whole, ulin& storage an~ distribution facilities shall be subject
to all applicable Collier County Noise Refutations,
WatEr Msn'n_eell~ent/Detendon Area as 13ufrer
· Thc principle water management/dcte~tion area is r~qzgred to be located
along the e~stem edge of th~ project to ~reate · ~rester separation between
planned uses on this she and residential uses to the east of this Planned Unit
Development.
" . · "' ,~ rna~Icr ass'ociation shall be established for the purpose of maintaining aH
..... · '.-.., '.'. '. .. landscaped areas, the water management si·leto and other common open
_.'. ",.':'~ '~,~' '.i;" ': ' ' ;' "spaces tress to insure healthy plant material, that is free of trash, debris, or
:: ,. '... .... .' 'maximU.,.m' of.02 footcandles.
'" 15. ConStr~ct[on Vehicles :
.. Cons~rucgon ~hiclcs shall be parked as far aw-ay from Dorm· Street
· practical during the course of construction,
'l~ul;~lar .alarms shall be placed o. nly along the west side o[ the buildin~ and
shall be properly maintained at ail times.
17, Architectural Standard1
Should metal buildings be erected on Trncts 2, $, ~ nnd 10, they shall be
covered with a brick, stucco or s~milnr type of facade off both the north and
east sides, with the exception of Tract 2 which shall have n facade pL'~ccd on
the north, cast and south side for the purpose of enhnncing compat~ity with
.APR 0 1 1997
,,,. /7
re. slden~lal propenle~ in the v~inlty of ~ im~erty, ?raa 3 s~ ~ a
la,de plaid o~ on ~e n~ side and Tn~
" L '~tba~kRe~men~
· .,l '..~ ..
~ requ~ed ~ the ~Hler ~un~
s~H be ~Itted to ~nt onto ~nna S~ct a~ free-smnd~j
o~ ~ ~[tted on ~e ~t side of th~ p~ed offi~ buHd~
~ r r- .... i
As required by the Col/let County :Zonlnf Ordinance so as to Insure · slx (6)
fog· high buffer w~th 80 percent Opedty w/fl~n t~be (12) montes of thc date
f~t planted. In ·.ddition, · mature landscape butter of twenty (:20) feet in
bel~ht shaH be JMtaHed ·IonS the gas·em eds~ or the ofl'~ bu~in8 to further
**
The ofTice bufldfnl ~ not con·nth the emmtm mo of' I!~ COlon and
· h.tp nnd pble type so as to take on the chrmer or · rz~d~th] ~
Air condlffontnI uniu for Tract I shin be located away flrom rmMenflal
10. Uz2u~
No glare fi.om U~hu shah be permixted beyond the boundary of the ~
~d ~ U~u sh~ ~ ~clded ~d oriented t~s ~e b~dlnf ~o m~
· .*.. -.v ,'.,y ~ ~..,.2k:
1!
APR 0 1 1/)97
/,::)
SECTION V
The purpose of this $ec6. on is to set forth th~ sgp~hgom established by
Environmen~ ^dvtso~ Counc~
A. Petitioner s~ be subject to Ordinanc~ No. 82-2 ns amended by Ordinance $9-$7
(rue of natt~ spedct in land~cap, tn~).
B. Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance No. 82-37 as amended by Ordinance 89-$3
(remov'~ of exotic species).
C. ?eri~oner shah be subject to the Collier County Comprehensive Plan Policy ]2.1.3
contained in the Conservation and Contra! Ma~.agement Element (discovery of a
archaeological or historica~ site, artifact or other indicator of
· D. Petitioner' sb~ obtain and submit documentation of aH neceuary loc~, rmte and
"" E. The applicant sh~ be subject to all environmental ordinances in effect at the
· · ."..'...-.' :, of development order appronh. .:.. ·
· .F, The'applicant shall retain aH e~Eng native v~getation within ~n proposed buffer~
""" '" Retention shall include ali t~t¢ su'ata.
· ~ G. The applicant shah retain aH native vegetation outside of the lake boundary, on
-": ~ · Tract 11, u~e~s the configuration of the water manageme.nt system within Trac~ 11
cannot accommodate the retention of native vegeta(ion in specific areas.
· . 12
gECTION VI
TRANSPORTATION
:
1. The devtlopt~' shall provide arttTla~ level rcrtet r~htini at tM projec: entrance.
·: ~. The koad im~ac-t fee ;hall be 'as ~.: foflh in Ordlnante tS-ii, as amended, and
Ihtl~ be ptld at the ttme b~dLng peri.ts
the Board of C~nty Comtn~one~
3. ,~,c~ss imptovemen~ shah not be rdbJect tO
place before an7 c~r:ifica~es of t~pancy are ~utd, and shall not be subject to
.. tmpak't fee rrcdits. '
.'.4, ' ~ t~a~c c~nt~l d~vlcu used ;h~ll t~r&form ~lth the ~lnua! on Un/fo~m '~a~c
· . . .?i ~ ~ ~ i ~ u rttt~rtd !~ Chap;et Slt0'/4S, ~-~tda Sta~
.;. · :' · ~ ...'i., $- .'A~ to the project shall be tt~'leted to rilht ~u'n-ln/right tm'n-out,
· ". ' "~" -: '/. The Pe~Uon~r shall provide a fifteen (1.~ f~! temporary co~tN~Mn easement
.' . .: ..: · "':.;' .i .'on the south side of.Radio Road and alon~ ~ entire f~n~age for the four-litttnB
..~ ,; . .. !...... :
13
APR o 1 1997
~CTION ~II
~ purpose of this Sec'don is to se~ ronh the tn:~bee~ end u~cs r~quh'cmcnu
· which ere r~:l~tred' of the pro]ca developer.
1. Data/led pavia& ~reding. site d~,~e and ut~ty plans shall be submitted to
Project Review Services for rev~a.. No consm.-cflon permiu shall be issued unless
and un~ aj~p~'tl of the proposed c~mu'uc~on tn ac~,~tance with the submined
plan~ k ~rantcd by Project Re~ew Services.
2. Design and cOnstruction of ail tmprovements sha~ be subject.to compliance with
" ........the approprhte provbions of the Collier County $ul:~v~lon Re~lations,
"'~ ' ~" . '"~ "i.". ; "...' .'.' '~. , '.'.: *
...' i:,~...':.::~'..- ?,~..._Tne p~Jec~ ~ be.phued in accor~ce with Collier CO~w Sub~vUton '":
.:.. · .--."..~'.'.~' ..;.,~,~.~ rl,l~...; ' ...; ,, ~j~..',~; ,,~....' '_... ', . · -.. ~ -
......~..,.:.~.;,~,...~\, ,~. ; ..,,,,-.;-.f- ~:,: .~.. ~.,....-.~ ~..~.... ..,.~ .:..,....
,. ,.~ t ..-.,~...,,.,..% .~..... , ,:. ~.:.....:...%~..,..~.=3:...,,.. :.,o,.. : .' .' .". ·
· .'' . ?.'' '%'.,' ';' ' ''''.' ' '.' ;"'.'.-'~.."'.' :- ." ~ ·. .'. '. : ·
: '!..i..'..'. f '. ~i ,-'~ ~4:, :,- .~?.evelope. r ~d a~ subSe~lUent pcetionen L'~ hereby ~.:aced on not,ce that th -~,'.
." .. [~:'. '~."~ ~...-;. sn&u t~e re uu'e~ to'sath the
· '.. ".'~ 'i. :~',, :.: ;.'.:.' .... Cl. l'y requ~remcnu of ~ County ordinances or code~ in .-.,.:
· :. , ,..j.~: -):~,f:~..~..e,n. cct.prlor_t? or. concurrent with any subsequent development order relattn~ to .'
· . . ~. .... :/:. cms slte...'fAts Includes, but h not lknlted to, Subdivision Master Flans, Site ".
· '.' : ':' '~: :i:~.'."[ffu=l~'~eal lopmcnt Plans and any,o, ther application that' w~l result tn the 2suance of ·
, .,'.· . '. ,: .' · .,L ~j L'.': ' -..~ ~.. ~ ( ' .. . . '
"$. ' T'ne 20 fi. lnnd$cape buffer i]cn~ ~, =;,rthern Prol~rty li~e shall be in a separate
: ,-~' '." ii platted tract (not within a fight-of-way) or within the platted lots that directly
" .... "" ....;' '. backup to tn off-sfte County r~ght-ef, way, prov/ded the buffer is not located
"' ~ '".i" "'.='=':.: fi any ~tfljty or tL,'ainagc easement. All landscape buffen requfred by the Subdiv~ion
· ?'::' Regulatfons must be designed, bonded, permitted and constructed as part of the
; ... ' . subdivision improvements for the project.
'z. '.'.-"..... ": .
· '...-./; ' ..f; : . . :
:
1. Sewage collection, sewage transmission and inlertm sewage treatment facilities to
serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained
in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 88-76, as amended, and other
applicable ..County rules and regulagons, as applicable.
2. All cuszomcrs connecting to the sewage collection fac~iiies ~o be constructed will
be customers of the County and will be billed by the County in accordance with the
14
APR 0 1
' CountT's established rates. Should the Count,/not be In · Pus[·ion to provSda
sewer se~ce to the proje~ the sewer customen s~ll be customers cf the interim
ut·lit7 esttblhhcd to scl~ the project vntil the County's c~-slte s~*w'er facilities nra
tvtihble to serve the Fmject.
3. ' Pric~ to comu'ucflon phm and p¼t Ipprcr~ · kt~er from the City o! Naples
W·ter Dls~ct stating that the dh·ftc· has r~ewed ·nd tl~,n2vcd the
facilities construction document1 rt3f servlce to the pt. ojcct shall be submitted.
· l~'epL'ed so that all sewage ficr~,jAg to the Cmmt,/s maker pump suflon is
trL. umlt~ed by one (1) ·din on*site pump mike. Duc to the dcsf~ and
c~n~s~ltton cf the master pu,~ s~flon, fl~w by Srl~Y JAto the ~adon w~ not
be post,lc. The DeyeJoper's ~oflneer shall meet with County stuff' prkrf to
conu~eflclng prepara~ion of comu'u~on drawfnp, so that all aspecu cf the
vyxtcm design can be coordi~ted with the County's ~ewer master plzn.
:~. The'exis~g off-site ~ewage trannn~ fa~M~ of the district mUSt be evaluated
for hydraulic capactt)' to ~erve tl~ proJec~ and improved as requh'ed ouutdc the
· projec'~ boundary to l~wlde 'adequate copac~Ty to tramper· the
wsstcwiter ~enerated without ad~.rle impact to the e:dlflnS ~on hci~fiez.
· '- . . .d~.~2~fion documcnu taus! be pro,dod with the final site plan and lm~de for
· '... '.~:: ;. the pl~erty ownership and mt~,,te~nce.
SI~CTION
WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIRIg,iENTS
'". The p~rpo~ of I~ ~'~o~ ~ ~ ~ k~ ~ ~~ ~b~hed ~ ~e Water
~ ~ ~d ~on of ~ ~p~enu shah
. ... . .'.. ~e approp~te pr~fo~ of ~e ~er ~ Sub.ion Re~go~
~'~'~'~..:.."."'?.'.'-;',~"~.":~ ..~.:.,'.
~~~.~.i~.<~;~..;' .::...-.'........,..... ,. .... ..~ .... .....~.
,~.,~l,.;~;~.~,;~.~;-,E.agequa~ of ~e ~ d~ ~e
· I'~i'.· ?'*.~;~/~r!M'~.~"adeqvnte ~pacl~ to h~gle ~e ~o~ ~p~mcnu shah
';~';'~:..~'~;'",":~:~.";~,,~,..,,'~'"~.'.-','~',.'U...~..' .. ., · '~'. ":. ' .
t.;~,,b~.~ .i:~,;~;.~'.;., .i~ ~ .~'~, '~..,~.; .~ · ~, r~.. : .
. :'.'.. '~6. ~ ~e ~ of En~effn cla~ p~ of ~ detention area
~ddoner sh~.ob~ a South ~ogda Water Moalement
· . ~rk pe~t p~or to const=ction pl~ appmL H~ver, if ~uth ~ogda Water
~. · ..,- '.: M~asement Dh~ct dete~ ~at a ~tland does not ~s~ Co,er Co~
· . '.hsue ~e s~ace ~ter ~c Wgtten ~aflon to
. prided.
16 :
APR 0 1 '191
sl~CrlON ix
SUBDIVISION EXCEFTION$
Thc purlx~ of this section is
' ' ' ' ' '~d~s~mcet
. rcq~cmcnu for s~ect p~men{ ~L ~P~{ ~d ~e~{ edges ~dcd
~ $ub~ton Rc~afio~ ~clc ~ Scion l~. S~eet ~t-Of-W~ ~:
~ . W~dtoa~~
. ,,. ..,. ....~ ,...;;.~-,~.~ ,.,... . '.
, .,. . ..... .............. .-_:...,
..., :.~.... ~,. · ; ,~. ~.~ ,~ ;~':. 1~'~.~.~ ~. .,, .... . .. ..
' ;.' ."; {' "'~ .;.;?~'.5..'..'Su~on Re~ago~ ~cle
": ')'[>.:~}...;i?'~/-,f.'~':.'~' ':}cq~cmcnu f~ rcfc~ncc m~kc~ to ~ plaid ~ ~tcr ~ ~ ~bje~ to .. ,. ·
. .. ..~.,:,.~:~:';'g.,.'~."'....;.~,'.,.:..,.., .
:.':~:.:~-;,',:'~:?.~l.~!>:,~?,:.;~;~ -.:.:~.~,.,.','..,.. .- .
~ .:., '..' '.~ . .?.~' . , · . '.: · . .
,."' ..........:..,:'!.;..,.~.;~ :( . · . . .
. ,' . ~.' ..F.,.;,' ~'.,.~, · : ·
.: f:.:f.l'. ;..:~.~'."~;~ .;'. ]. .' ...
~.'....;~,'..., .,~'~.~.::.?~.,.: ~* ..' . .,.
.... ; - ., ~ ..'- ..,
. ..,.';*... ~, ~ .. ,~,.. , ;. .. .
,.. :[,: ' ~. '. ~..',
.';.. :..f.,..........~-
· '.; . ,'. '.' ; ·
17
APR 01 1997
,~:~i,~.'.... i~ROPEETYDW-.SC'RIWITM . tl/4oftheNofllw~.stl/~orSectlonl, Tomuhip~0
'- ': !': ,' ;. '" ·· Northe.~ 1/4 ot',he Noflhe~ ........ ,.- ,,,,.,,~,,.,~ ~0.O0 feet t~.teof.
¥:,.., .: .
, '-.'; ..', .
', .':
APR 0 1 1997
~. ,:,?6
O;
4
I
I
10
13
11
20
22
A I~SOLUTION BY TI~ BOA]~ OF CCXJI~TY
CCI~ISSI01~ OF COLLIER ~,
OF ~ COLLIER C~ ~
D~~ CODE ~ING O~I~
91-95 ~ ~ ~IO S~ ~,
~IL 1, 1999~ ~ P~IDI~ ~
~FJ~S, the ~dio Square PUD, Ordinance 91-95 adopted on
October 8, 1991, is aub~ect ~o the provisions of Section
2.?.3.4., of the Land DeveJopment Code (LDC}, TiBe LIBlta for
~proved PUD Zoning Districts toqether with their respective
Haster Plans; and
I4HE~J~S, the PUD was adopted consistent with and under the
provisions of the Collier County Growth Hanaqemsn~ Plan; and
~IEP~S, the applicant has acknowledged that the subject PUD
shall comply ~lth the Architectural Standards, as defined in
Section 2.8 of the Land Development Code
~P~.~S, the Board of County Co~issioners h~s reviewed the
~UD and has determined to extend the current PUD Zoninq for t~o
2~ years, until April 1, 1999~ and
NO~, THE~EFOP~ BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Zoning
29 Appeals of Collier County, Florida that:
30
31 1.
32
3.1
34 9.
3S
.18 3.
39
42.
This
The above recitals are adopted herein by reference
as if fully set forth herein.
This Resolution shall constitute evidence of
compliance with the review requirements of Section
2.7.3.4 of the LDC.
l~rsuant to said section of the LDC, the current
PUD approval is hereby extended to April 1, 1999~
at the end of which time the o~ner shall submit to
the procedures in LDC Section 2.?.3.4.
Resolution shall become effective i~nediatel~ upon its
43 approval.
44 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded
45 the minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition for
46 which the extension is qranted.
APR 0 1 1997
~ VO~.
~ Done ~:hXs
!
10
11
14,
I$
17
day of
,., 1997.
BOARD OF COUNTY CCI~ISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CH3LI~
APPROVED AS TO FOR~ AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
~JO.~E M. STUDENT -
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
APR 0 1 1991
EXE~ SUMMARY
~AM~ REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATIVE TO ORDINANCE 92~ AS
ED, ALSO KNOWN AS ~ MOCAKE PUD, WHICH, ACC~~G TO THE
REQUIRED PUD STATUS REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY
OWNER/AGENT, HAS NOT COMM NCI. D CONSTRUCTION, AS DEFINED IN
SECTION 2.7.3.4 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMF. NT CODE,
RES~G IN $1:VERAL POSSIBLE COURSES OF AC'HON FOR THE BOARD OF
._._~UNTY COMMISSIONERS TO CONSIDER.
CONSIDERATIONS.
This PUD wn~ originally approved on Januacy 14, 1992. Section 2.7.3.4 of the Collier County
L~d Development Code requires that the project developer submit an annual report on the
progress of development, commencing on the fifth annive~lcy of the PUD approval by the Board
of County Commissioners. The singular purpose of this report is to evaluate whether or not the
project has commenced in earnest in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section 2.7.3.4.
The above referenced PUD has been identified as a project which has not commenced construction
u deigned in Section 2.7.3.4. Staff has utilized the required PUD Status (monitoring) Report,
supplemented by field observation and review olin house records to verify the current status ofthe
PUD and as 1he basis of a recommendation to the Board consistent with the options provided in
Section 2.7.3.4 (1) & (2). Section 2.7.3.4 reads as follows:
2 XJ. 4.
lime limits for approved PUD master plant, In the event that a PUD
master plan is given approval, and the landowner(s) shall:
Fail to obtain approval for improvement plans or a development order for
all infrastructure improvements to include utilities, roads and similar
improvements required by the approved PUD master plan or other
development ortlen for at least 15 percent of the gross land area of the
PUD site every five years of the date of approval by the Board of County
Commi~ionert; and
Fail to recelve flnal local development orders for at least 15 percent of the
total number of approved tbvelling units In the PUD, or in the case of
PUDs consisting of nonresldential uses, JO percent of the total approlvd
gross leasable floor area within the PUD every six years of the date of
approval by the Board of County Commlssionerx
APR 0 1 lgg7
TEe project developer shall submit to the Planning Servica Director a
s~tus report on the pro~re~ of development annually commencing on the
ftflk anniversary date of the PUD approval by the Board of County
Commir~oner~ The stngular purpose of the report will be to evaluate
w~:her oe not the project ba~ commenced in earner: in accordance with
~e criteria set fort& aborn
Should the Planning Servtce~ Director determine that the develo~oment
has commenced in earnext, then the land ~ludl re~aln lt~ existin$ PUD
el,peoval ami shall ~ be subject to additional review ~nd co--on
of new devdop or use modificatio
Should the Planning Services Director determine sitar tile development
kas not commenced in earnest, then upon review and consideration of the
report provided by the owner and any supplemental informatlon that may
be provided, the Board of County Commissioners shall elect one of the
following:
To extend the current PUD approval for a maximum period of 0~o years;
at tlte end of whictt time, the owner will again submit to the procedure as
defined hereia
Require the owner to submit an amended PUD in which the unimproved
portions of the original PUD shall be consistent wlth the Grm~th
Management Plat~ The existing PUD shall remain in effect until
~ubsequent action by the Board of the submitted amendment of the PUD.
If the owner fails to submit an amended PUD within six months of Board
action to require such an amended submittal, then the Board may initiate
proceedings to retone the unimproved portions of the original PUD to an
appropriate zoning classification consistent with the Future Land Use
Element of the Growth Management Platt
In the case of developments of regional impact, time limit restrictions
tkali be superseded by the phasing plan and/or time limits contained
within the application for development approval and approved as part of a
development order in conformance with F.~ ~ $80.06.
$,,'noosis of Aooroved Land U~t~; This PUD was approved for commercial uses generally
consistent with the C-3 zoning district, however, certain C-4 uses (Automobile Dealerships and
Hotels) and C-$ uses (Warehousing) are allowed. Approximately thirty-one (31%) percent of the
land area is set aside as preserve area and landscape buff-ers. Warehousin8 and wholesaling
activities cannot be constructed on the land area near Immokalee Road.
-2-
APR 0 ! 1997
Consistency with Comorehensive Growth ManAfement PlAn' The subject PUD is desJfputed
as an "Activity Center' on the Future Land Use Element of the O~,~. Bt~d on st·fl'review of the
approved land uses, the PUD has been determined to be consistent with the Collier County Growth
binnagenem Pr~n. The PUD is deemed consistent with the following GMP Elements (FLUE,
Traffic Circulation Element, Open Space/Natund Resource Element, Other.
Consistency with the Collier Coun~ Land Develooment Cgde ~ The PUD has been distn'buted
to the appropriate jurisdiction review entities specifically for review of the PUD for consistency
with current land development regulations. Based on that review, the followin8 incorais~encies
have been identL6ed:
TraAq>ormion: (Tra~qc impacts, access management, etc.) The PUD is accessed from · road
easement created with the !-75 interchange established At Immokalee Road. The easement serves
to esutblish tn interconnection with Immokalee Road for properties nearest the I-'/5 freeway (i.e.
Crestwood, Mocake and Brentwood PUD's), the purpose for which was to access properties that
would otherwise be denied direct Access tO lmmokalee Road. Transportation commitments are
appropriate for today's condition. No other commitments would be required.
LAndscape: ~uff'ers/Green Space) The PUD requires landscaping As required by the LDC at time
of SDP approvals. Additionally, a twenty-five (25) foot landscape buff.er is required on the south
property line which is more than is otherwise required by the LDC.
Environmental: (Protected species, green/open space) The environmental stipulations section
comprehensively deal with the site's jurisdictional wetland characteristics. By virtue of these
stipulations we can be assured that as development takes place, LDC requirements relative to
environmental relationships will be consistent with regulations.
Engineering/Water Management and Site Development: (Sewer/water, drainage issues)
Stipulations now contained within the PUD relative to utilities, subdivision regulations and water
management procedural and administrative requirements attendant thereto assure consistency with
LDC requirements.
Subdivision Regulation Exceptions: The current PUD waives requirements for sidewalks. Given
the fact that the street system constitutes A relatively short cai-de-sac with no interconnection to
adjoining property or residentially developed area, there is little likelihood of Any pedestrian
movement between the lots available for development.
Re~ulation Relative To Timint or Develoomenlr There are no issues relative to the
development ofthis land that required conditions to be met prior to initiatin8 any development.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A two year ex'tension of this PUD Ordinance will have no fiscal impact on Collie,
-3-
$TAI? i~.C'OMMENDATION.
~ ~e~n~hm~m rmdew of' .flxt, PUD document, r~..o~s that ~ Board of Cmu~
a two year ertmmon of'this PUD per the attached resolution.
C~l~lr ~£R
It(~ER? J. MULIIEi~ AICP
C~NT PLANNING MANAGER
DATE
ALD W. ARNOLD, AICP ~ DATE
ISLANNI~G $£RV]CE$ DEP.~ARTIVIF. NT DIRECTOR
¥1JqUENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
Ordinance 92-4 Ex Sumnary/pd
-4-
Ji I I I, ! I I .IL I ~ ~ ~
AGEN ~
NO. ~
APR 0 1 t9c37
RESOLUTION 99-....__.
A RESOLUTION BY 'l'ltE BOi~RD OF COUNTY
COIiNISSIONERS CT COIA,IF-,R COUI~Y,
FLORIDA, pURSUANT TO SECTION 2.7.3.4
OF THE COLLIER COU~q~L'Y L,~ND
DZ,9'ELOPMEItT CODE AFFECTIHG ORDINANCE
92-4 KNOWN AS KOCAKE pUD, EXTENDING
TIiE CURREHT PUD APPROVAL TO JANUARY
14, 1999; AND pROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WltEREAS, the Mo~ake pUD, ordinance 92-4 adopted on 3anuary
14, 1992, is subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.4., of
the Land DeVelopment coda (LDC), Tl~e Limits for Approved PUD
Zoning Districts together with their respective Master Plans; and
WHEREAS, the pUD was &dgpted consistent vith and under the
provisions of the Collier County Growth Manaqamant Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has rsvievad the
PUD and has determined to extend the current PUD zoning for two
years, until January 14, 1999; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Zoning
Appeals of Collier county, 1Plorida that:
1. The above recitals ~e_ado~ed herein by reference
2. This Resolution shell constitute evidence of
compliance with the review requirements of SeCtiOn
2.7.3.4 of the LDC.
3. Pursuant to said section of the LDC, the currant
PUD approval is hereby extended to January 14,
1999; at the end of which time the owner shall
submit to the procedures in LDC SeCtion 2.7.3.4.
This Resolution shall become effective l~mediately vpon its
approval.
BE XT FURTHER RESOLV£D that this Resolution be recorded in
the minutes of this Board and in the records of the petition for
which the extension is granted.
APR O 1 1997
.,... 7.,,,-
Done thSe day of
_, 2997.
COUNTY, FLORXDA
~XG~ E. BROC3C, CLKRX
T1KO'fliY 1,. ltAHCOCK, CKAIRRAR
APPROVED AS 'FO FOP..~ AND LI~AL SUFFICIENCY:
ORIE lt. ~TUDE~;T __.
ASSISt'ANT COUHTY ATTORHEY
f l ~oc & k e J,~'O l r o~
-2-
APR 0 1 1997
for
MOCAI~ ·
Prepared Fort
COLLIER COUNTY pLANNING SERVICES
2800 North Hors~hoc Drt~
Naples, Florida 33942
Prepared By:
HOLE, MOl, ri'ES & ASSOC/ATES, INC..
?15 Tenth Street South
Naples, Florida 33940
(813) 262-46'1'/
~ Filc 1~o. 90,'110
Dnte RcHsed: ~Oc~ober. 1991
Date Rc~,cd By
~ ~ 92~
APR 0 1 1997
ThBLE OF coN'r~
SECt'ION !
STATEMEN'T OF COMPLIANCE
.1
SEC'I'ION 11 ~
PROPERTY O'W~'ERSHW, LEGAL DESCRIFI'ION AND SHORT TITLE .. 2
SECTION III
STATEMENT OF IlVTENT
.3
SECTION IV
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT R, EGULATIONS ................... ; ... 6
SECTION v
TRANSPORTATION REQUIRF~.%fF=N'I'S ............. ' .............. 10
SECTION VI
UTILITY REQI.,~:~.~ .................................... 11
SECI'ION vii
M.A~ AG EME..N~ STANDARDS .................. 14
WATER .........
SECTION VIII
ENVIROIO,t~"rAL STANDARDS
SECTION IX
SUBDIVISION EXCEPTIONS
LIST OF EXItlBITS
A'I-rACHMENT A - CONCEPTUAL PUD MASTER PLAN
ATTACHMENT B - LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SECI'ION 1
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
The development o[ 8~' acres o[ ptoperi)' in Se~on 30~ Township 48 South, Rang~ 26 East
ns a Planned Unit Developmen~ to b~ Imo~ u thc Moc~kc PUD ~ ~ ~ ~mpl~
~th thc pla~g goals and objecti~s of th~ ~cr ~ Or~h M~gemcnt Plan for
~e foll~ng repons:
1. ~c O~h Mana~mcnt Pl~ d~i~ ~e subje~ ~ ~ ~ Ac~ ~ut~
Whkh h Ibc prcfcff~ ~iion for hi~ dc~[~ ~Mcn~
~rchous~ and mot~ ~ wMch a~ d~i~ io m~t thc ~tcnt
Management Plan wMch cn~u~g~s ~ me p~je~.
3. ~c projc~ ~ ~m~lc ~t~ and ~cn~ i~ su~g ~nd
4. ~c proje~ d~lopmcnt h plied ~ ~te na~
ma~ad~ for ~tcr m~ngement ~ a~ ~ ~c~
~pab~ttcs.
5. P~sto~ ~e ~clud~ ~ ~e proJe~ to ~ ~c numar of
~u onto ~o~lcc Roa~
6. ~t~ fcamr~ ~to ~c p~cd d~l~cnk g~[ ~ ~P~[ f~
sctbac~ ~d o~n spa~ are d~t~ed ~o c~ ~c
garry into ~cr ~un~ and Napl~
~c projc~ h compa~le ~ ndja~nt l~d us~ t~u~
of si~ctur~, lhe pla~mcnt of land ~e buffe~ ~d ~c p~ d~lopment
s~dards ~nt~cd hcrc~
~! impr~mcnu sh~ ~ ~ compBan~ ~ a~H~blc
9. ~1 final l~ d~lopmcnt o~c~ for IMs p~ am mb~ to
~ncu~n~ Manaicmcnt S~tcm a~ ~plement~ ~ ~e Ad~uate ~bHc Fa~t~
Ordinance.
10. ' ~i rcfcmn~s to thc ~llicr ~un~ ~nl Ordln~
Ordinan~ ~paci Fc~ Ordinanc~ ct% as ~ed he~i~ sh~l
~ thc adopted Unified ~nd Dc~lopmcnt ~c for ~ct
No. ~
APR 0 1 1997
SECTION Il
PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AND SHORT TITLE
2.1 I~ROPERTY OWNERSHIP
Th~ ~ubicct property is currently owned Daniel R. Mon~co, Tmsme.
2.2 LEOAL DESCRIPTION. I
A parcel of land located in th~ North ½ of Section 10, Township 48 Sou~h, Range 26
East, Collier County, Florida, ind is more psrtlcultrly de. scribed in Atlae2uneast "i~.
Th~ Ordinance shall be known and cited as "MOCAK~ Planned Unit Dc-~lopme. nt
Ordinance".
S£CI'ION IIl
STATEMEt~ OF INTENT
It.is the Project De~loper's intention to develop ·mbmd us~ c~nter with the
~nge of ~mpat~le and ~mpllmen~ had ~ ~clu~n~ ~ts~ offi~ wbol~
~rehous~ ~d motel us~. It b the pul~s~ of t~ d~cnt to
required dc~lopmcnt s~andards for the proJe~
3.2 PRO~ D~~
:~ project h d~t~ed for interactt~ ~mmercial and o~ us~
Future ~d Use Element of the Gr~h Management P~
Re~ls~o~ for development of the MO~ P~ sh~
~th the ~nlcnu of ihis do~mcnk p~-~a~cd U~I D~lopmeni
~d o~er appU~ble secfio~ and p~ of ~ ~
Ordtnan~ and Su~ton Re~la~o~ in gffea ~ the ~e of bu~d~g
appU~flom ~ere pani~lar de.lo.eat .s~d~ ~ not ~n~ed
hcre~, ~en the pr~slons of thc m~t s~ar ~tda
Ord~ sh~l ·pply.
B. U~ o~e~c noted, ~e de~do~ of nH te~ s~
'de~do~ set forth ~ ~er ~un~ ~ Or~
of bu~d~g ~t
~~ condtflo~ ~sed and aU ~phlc matefl~
rcstflctio~ for the development of the MO~ P~
the re~la~ons which g~em the m~er ~ w~ch ~ ~le may ~ d~lo~d.
D. If not speciS~l~ set forth or pr~d~ for in ~ls ~ ~en
of th= ~er ~unW ~ning Ord~an~ ~ u nm~de~ s~ ~.
3.4 ~RO~ P~ ~ ~ USE ~S~
~e p~jea m~ter plan tnclud~ ~ d~lo~blc ~ ~nt m~ ~ either
combined or d~lo~d sepa~te~, a~ for ~ler m~emcnk
of-~y, and ~me~tion. ~e m~ter plan h d=i~ to ~ ~a~ and
chani~ including the placement o[.buHdlnp ~ the ~I~ ~mcnt
~tem shall ~ determined at lhe time 'of plat or sim d~l~ment plan
appro~l prided all appli~ble sianda~s of thh o~l~n~ and abe ~llicr
~un~ Sub.ion Rc~lattons are
APR 0 1 1997
3.5
3.6
Any developable tracts w~thin the Plartned Unit Development are pctmittcd
a .4S ~oor ~ca Rudo prided ali p~r~n~ and lands~plng tequ~cmenu arc
Iff a~dStio~ motel uses may also be ~ltted at a dcmi~ of ~n~-s~ (2~
unt~ per acre b~ed upon whatc~r
w~ch ma~ also ~cludc arc~ p~dc6 for ~tcr manag~ent ~d
conse~adofl.
~c an~cipatcd time for build.ut o[
the 7car 2~.
.~c area ~tratcd as a wetland pr~ area ~ ~i~ "A' b ~tcndcd
pr~d~g rej~ena~o~ of wetland ch~c~
sto~ ~ter storage for t~s ~c~]opmcnC
In nddMon to the ~Hous ~cu ~d s~c itc~ s~ ~ ~it =~,
e~cmeflu, u nc~ssa~ (ut~, p~t~ sc~-publi~ cra), sh~ ~ ~ub~hcd
~ or ~on~ ~c ~Hous ~a~
~~ TO ~IS
~cndmen~ to ~s O~an~ ~d M~ter
requited.
PHor to the rc~rdtnS of the Ec~rd Plat. when rcqub~ ~ ~e Su~on
Ec~latio~ Or~, ~al plans for the rcqu~ed ~pr~mcn~
appr~l of ~ appropHate ~cr ~n~
~mp~an~ ~th the P~ Master PI~ ~c
plattMg la~ of the State of
~it "A", P~ Master Plan, ~nst[tut~ ~e requ~d
Subsequent to. or concu~ent ~th P~ app~ a Su~ion M~tcr
submitted for ~e entire area ~crcd ~ the
prope~ sad'the dc~lopmcnt of the ~d
Rc~lations.
~e pr~sio~ of Section 10~ of thc ~Mng OrdMan~ ~a~ing to site
~ppr~l shah apply to the d~lopment of
to the l~uance of a building ~mit or o~er
4
NO. ~
APR 0 ! 1997'
3.7
3.8
_PROVISION FOR OFF-SITE REMOVAL OF EARl'HEN MA'FERIAL
The excavation of earthen material and its stockpilinl in preparation of
management fac~ities or to otherwise develop water bodies is hereby permitted. If
after consideration of fill actMties on those bufldablc pon/oM of the pwjcc: site are
such that there Ls a surplus of earthcfl material, then hs off--,itc dhposal h al~ hereby
permitted subject to the following conditions.
1. BxcaN~tton neet'dries shall comply with the dcffm, ftioa of · 'l×'vcl°Pmeat
Bxcavation" pursuant to Ordinance Ho. 88-26 whereby off-site removal shah
not exceed 10~ of thc total volume _.,~_~valed up ;o a ~as:imum of 20,000
cubic yards.
~[ gmetablc to facilitate said removal shall be submhted to the Manager of
.Pl&nnin~ Services for ·pproval. Said ltmctable, shall .h~e ~. e, !C~..o!.~m
it will take to complete said removal, ho~r~ ot opereuon aha ~u~ ~,-.,. u,
any event, no timetable shall be ·pprcrv~d for off-site removal in excess of
ntnc~ days from date o! approval
3. Ail other pro.al·tons of Ordinance 8S-116 are applicable.
SUNSET AND MONITORING PROVISIONS
Mocake PUD shall be required to abide by any provisions in the Unified l~nd
Development Cede pertaining to sunscttin8 and monitorln~ as scheduled for adopgon
in thc Fall of 1991.
APR 0 1 1997
4.1
4.2
4.3
SECTION IV
GENERAL DF_.VELOPMENT REGULATIONS
'Ibc purpose of tMs Section is to delineate and g~ncr~ descn'og the project plan of
d~clopmen~ thc r~ctivc land us~ in~uding ~e project's d~lopmcnt ~tc~
Rc~tions for d~lopmcnt s~all ~ ~ ~n~
t~ d~mcnc ~grc s~c development s~d~ ~ not ~t f~ tpp~blc
d~clopmcnt stan ar ......... :...~ ~ ~dom s~ app..
of const~cdon pe~tting tot act~t~cs ~'~
~ERM~D US~ ~ ~U~
~: No bu~d~g or
erecte~ altered or used, or ~nd or ~ter
any ~ for other th~ ~ foU~ .
1. ~c~lttcd Pgnciosl Uses snd Stm~r~:
a. ~ q ..... ob~o
$taUo~s ~t~ ~epa~
Section 9.8 of thc ~n%
Bakery shops; bait rand tacld¢ shol:~ ban~. and ?n~._ cial
~stitutions; b~r'oor slid beauty shops; barn supply stores;
bicycle sales mhd services; blueprint shOl~ bookbinder',;
book stores; busine~ macblng servic~
Carpet and floor covering sales - which may include
storatc and installation; clothinS stotc~; cock',mi loun~e~
(in accordance with thc stmndm~ds o! Sc-~ion &Il of thc
Zoning Ordinance); conuncrcial ~don uses o
indoor; commercial schools,
Dclicntessenr, dcpanmcnl store~ dru[ stores;
cleaning shops; dry good stores~ s~i drape~ stoa.
Elect ,rlcal supply stores; equipment rentmh including lawn
6
NO. ~
AI R 0 1 1997
Ordlnancc); ~nc~l hom~; ~tu~ stor~
shops.
sto~ ' ~uidc ~plt~ ~ s{~ snd r~r
Oardcn s~p~ ...... ~ ~ .
~rds; ~ I~ ~ ~-ou~Ct Shops.
~CC cr~ SlOr~
~undfi~ ' sc~ sc~ o~ lc:~er S~:
thcstc~l ~quor stor~;
stor~; ~or ~u~omob~c ~P~ ~L
n. Offi~ ' Scnc~l; offi~ supp~ slo~
Ph°t°~p~c q~'~ sho--' o~te ~u~ (~ a~ ~__.
P' or f~t f~ ~mumnU; (~ a~n~ ~.~c
sior~l SUtiOflc~ StO~; SU~~kc~ -
s. Vaflc~ sto~ ~hicic rental ' aut~obfl~ on~
.. ,,._ !? _
:
· 4.4
veterinarian off. cs and clinica - not outside kennels.
Watch and precision tn~mamcnt ~eDaT~ shops.
Warehousing; whole.ling and coral~rablc usc~ s1~dl I~
pcrmlttcd on all t~acts eaccpt Tract 1.
An), othcr commerchd u~ or profcs.siorml se~c~ which
arc compa~bla in nature with the foregoing uses and
which the M~magc'r of ]'lztu~g Services/ZoneS Dbcctor
or Ms designee determines to be ct~mpafabl~ to and
compatible w~th thc forc$o~n$ uses.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
1. ~ - Ten thousand (10,000) sq. uare feet.
~. Tract I - '~$ feet
Tram 2-$ - 100 feet
.W
3.
B. ~ . Twer~tT-~ (Z) feet
~ .Tcn (10) fact
required by thc Collier Count~ 7x)nin~ Ordinance.
6. Distance Between Structures On the Samo Trac~ * One-half o~ the sum o~ the
building heights but shall, be · minimum of Ten (10) feet.
?. ~_inlmum Floor Area of Structut'ct - One thousand (1,000) square feet per
building on the ground floor.
APR 0 ! 1997
10.
A. A 25' landscape, buffer shah be located alon[ the southern
boundary to buffer this commercial development from the adjoinin[
land uses.
The required $' wide perimeter lands~apl~ ak)n~ lbo internal roadway '
B, system shall bo located ou~ido tho ro~d
C.. All other landseapln$ shall be supplied ~ required b'/ tho Collier
County Zorting Ordtnanc~ in ¢~fcct at th~ ti~e of th~ sito dcvelopm¢flt
plan,
Mnsdmum Number of Motel Uni~ - Twent~ix (26') un]t~ pe~ acre with a
- um floor area of four hundr,-.~t (400) squ~re feet ·nd · .maj..urn tloor
minim ...... ,-c0, s,,unre feet for each motel umt.
·rea of rzve hunoreo ·no n~ ~ ~ -~
~ - All silage shall 6e subject to thq Collier Covnty Sign Ordtt~tnce.,
~ amended.
APR 0 1 1997'
SECTION
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
of n .~a~c sl~a~ hdudin~ h~c~cct at ~ ~ ~t
,may se~e t~s pwjec~ by ~y of n ~onm~ ~d ~ deem~ ~ted
3. ~ dc~lopcr sh~ p~de le~ ~d fl~t turn I~ a~ ~cfl~ ~1 s~ct
~gh~g on ;minOrCO Road at ~c pwjcCt a~: ~e
~pr~men~ sha~ ~ shared ~ other d~lo~n who ~
~cm.
4. ~e wad ~pa~ fee sh~ ~ ~ set foflh ~ ~~ ~55, u ~end~ ~d
shall ~ paid at ~e t~e b~{ ~ a~ ~ u~ olhe~
app~d ~ ~e Board of ~un~
5. A~e~ ~p~menu sh~ not ~ subJc~ to ~pa~ f~ ~diu ~d ' ~ pla~ ~fore ~y ce~t~ of ~ a~
T~c ~nt~l D~s u reqv~ by ~pter 316.0747 ~o~
SECTION V1
6.1
T~¢'pur~x~c of %h~ section J$ to set [orth the utter/cs and en~inccrin$
which mvst be accommodated b~ the proje.~
Water diatn'bution, scw~g¢ collection and ~-tmmi~km ~ i~te. tSZa w~t~
Coun~ Ordin~n== Mo. ~76, ~ am=nde~ and o~er app~bl= ~ ~I~
~d r=~latlo~
~ ~ ~stomc~ w~e~g to thc ~icr
~ thc ~un~ ~ a~~ ~ ~
~un~ not ~ ~ a ~Mon ~o p~dc
scar ~fl~ ~c a~blc to sc~ ~c pwj~
3. It is anfl~t~ ~at ~c ~un~ U~d~,D~Son ~ ul~atc~ ~P~
.~blc ~ter to meet ~e ~~ dc~
~igon to supp~ ~ble ~tcr to
adequate to mcct aB requkcmcn~ of
a~ecmcnt s~B be entered ~io ~ ~e ~ ~ ~ ~lo~r,
treatment fa~iti~ ~o ~ ut~he~ ~c
thc ~unU, prior to ~c appel o[ ~on d~cna f~ ~c pmjc~
and ~ ~ ~nfo~an~ ~th the ~ui~
No. ~7~ ~ amcndc~
4. If an Jnt~m on-site ~ter ~pP~, ~cnt
vtf~d to sc~ me p~jcc~ ~
day domestic demand, in addition
~e app~Pgate ~rc ~nt~l Dbt~
11
0 1
'7,
8o
present verificauon pur~u.m ,~ ~ 1o the
Scz~icc Commission h~ grtntcd tcrrttorhl
Florida Public rovtde sewer and/o.r wztc. r,~_rv~,.,.,t ' thc
l::)_cvclo~_r_to p. e se~Ccs t~u~ ..' .........
~;ount7 can provide thcs
p~cparcd to contain thc dcsi~,n sna rojcct to the futura central sc~raSe
which will ulttmalcly connc~ th¢.P._: *~,-,,d riohtt-o[-wsy.
;-'-:~:,:... nf the District In the IgUnOUlC.~ r.u- ~" ' Il tO lhe west n~,l~U'~.t-
ta~.l,- ........ - ' --'itc ....rap stlUO
· .,,,,, hc cxlendcd from tl~c msm.~m', .~'~: .... , ~ tnten:onnc'~"tot to me
way line of Immokalca I~o~,, ,,,. ,- parmlt fo~ stmpTe
pump station with appropriately ioc~tcd ysh~s to
redirection of thc project's sc-~ when connection to thc Count, s c~utral
sewcr facilitics becomes
· tcr dism'budon s7siam lo serve the pro]act tllust t)~
Thc on-stsc wa the south Side O[ L1z,~ok,~ce
to *thc District's 1~. or !~ inch w~tcr irnsiIl on
..... ,:-¢ o[ the eroicc~
· ain nrc mremcn pe .. e~tcosiou sl~l
w'flh the m sizi g .q _ , _.~__.ndstz~ofthemtin
Plan. Thc coordination tot tl~e wca~u,, .-
be processed throu5h the County Utility Division. Dming design o! the. sc
[acilidcs, the followi~$ features shall 136 incorpotltcd into the
system:
a. Dead and mains be eUminatcd by loop,S th-- b3ternal plpcline
network. .
· b. the west, and the south pro~rg' ~,' ~' .'"-
be pro~idcd .to ..... ,- -,,-ccd to thc County and me ~'~
Ioc~tJOnS tO De l~UXum~y el~
during the dcsif,rn phase o1: thc project.
· ion of construction plan~ and Enal plat for
Prior to or at thc time o[ subm~ss ..... ~,* Collier County Water-Sewer
;~;[ ,~miect. the potable water supp? u~..'~ ."'_" ....... *,, the m-~crty and bc
t..* r--o -. -- ro'cct shall be tnstMlco aui=,.-,,, -~ r--
District to serve this p ,~
in service.
1!
~n_etneerino
1. Dcitailed pav~nL ~'adin8. site drainage and utility pi&ns shall be submitted to
Project Rc~cw Services {or review. No construction permits shall be issued
unless and until approval of th~ proposed construction in accordance with the
submhtcd plans is sranted by Project Review Services.
2. D~t~n end constn2ction of all improvements shall be s~b~-ct to compliance
with the appropriate provisions o(the Collier County Subdh4sion Roiulatlons.
3. Work within Collier County or private rt~,hts-o[.~ shall mcct the
rccluiremcnu o! Collier County rff, ht'o~'wtl Ordinance 82-91.
· c ueot titioncrs L*c hereby laced on nog~ that
4. The dcvelo r Led all subs q pe ~pmcz .
thc)' shall ~ePC~equired to satis~ the requirements o[ ~I1 Co,aery ordinances or
codes in e~ect prior to ot concurrent with any subsequent development order
relating to this site, includlns but not limited to Subdivision Mtstct Plalxs, Site
Dcvelopme,,t Plans and an), other application that will result in the ~
o! s final or final local development order.
$. Construction pl&ns shall tdenttltY in detail the swale in the access road
the site end the Immokalce Road Canal The calmctt7 of the road sw&le shall
be analyzed. If capacity is not adequate, improvements will be required to
make it functional.
6. Lsndscapins shall llot be placed within the water ma~la&,emclit ira
specifically approved by Project Review Serd~L
?. ' h: accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management
(SFW1VID), Chapters 40E4 and 40F.-40, this project shall be de-ii, cd
storm event oi 3-day duration &nd 2~. yuat tatum [requency.
8; An Excavation Permit will be required for the proposed pre.treatment
in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 88-26 ~nd SFWMD ales.
9. Deem'led pavinL ~radinL and site drainage plans be submitted to project
Review Services for review. No construction permits h~ll be issued unless and
until approval o~ the proposed construction in accordance with the submitted
plans is L'rantcd by Project Review Services.
i0. Deal n and construction o( ail JmprovcmCnts shall be subject to compliance
with t~e appropriate provisions o[ the Collier County Subdivlsioh Relulations-
I1. A copY o! SFWIV[D Permit or Early Work Pctmlt is required prkx
construction plan approval
13
AG£~
NO.
APR 0 1 1997
'/.1
$£C1'[0N VH
WATER MANAGEI',fE.IqT STANDARDS
'l'be pur1~3se o{ this section ts to set [orth Ibe water m~na~cmcnt o~lu~cn~s for
the project.
3. A ~ Of S~ pc~t Or ~ W~ ~c~t ~'~ ~ tO
~tmction plan appel.
~oflda Dep~ent of T~flon ~ ~ ~dn Water
shall ~ sub~tted ~fore ~ns~ctwn P~ '~ ....
3. DetaH~ ~ter management pl~ uv~.. ......... Sim
s~led ~ a prof~sionsi en~cer sha~ ~ ~d~ pwr ~ ~z~
Dc~lopmcnt P~an nppr~.
14
$£CI'ION VIII
EI, rVIRO~'~IM EHTAL STANDAP. DS
8.1
projec~ dcvclopcr. ~,
A. Thc pet|floncr shill p~do o~im ~d~d c~n~ ~nd ~tAnd
mltlge~on duc to ~c ~ o[ ~ d~o~ent o[ ~ 1.
~. ~ti~atton for ~pecu.to ~tr ~n~ ~i~ ~ ~ mmp~
~th the rati~ and rtquircmcnu of A~nd~ ~ o[ ~ ~ ~ Water
Management D~t~ct.
and an a ~d ~fl~don ~u sh~ ~ ~ P~ t~
D. ~e ~ter m~a~ment ~tem sb~ ~ ~n~ed st ~e ~ ~ter
m~k clearon or o~er biolo~ ~di~to~s)'of ~c idjs~nt ~
completed prior to e~pmn~ ot mc F~-~ ,,--e= r
end appr~ed ~ p~ of ~c ~n~ ~t~on p~
(~tic-~ee} p~ f~ ~e site
shah ~ submitted to abe E~o~cn~! S~ of Pmje~ E~ ~ for
r~cw ~d eppr~l pflor to ~al site p~ appel
Preserve area Setback - At least fifteen (15) feet landward [rom the edge of
the preserve in all places and an avcrarc twent7'flv~ (25) fcct from ~e
landward edge of the Preserve. These setbacks n~y be adjusted bls~ Qn the
following considerations:
1. Should the South Florida Water Mana~tment i~"trlct, dur~g it's
permit renew process, require n natural vegetative buffer be created
between the lots and aT ]urlsdlcttonai wetland Preserve and/or
Conservation tract, the buffer shall l~ot be located w~thin the
boundaries of the lot(a). It shall be created as a sci)orate planed tract
15
APR 0 1 1997
or as n buffer easement over an expanded limit of the preserve tracts,
which would be dedicated ns Preserve/Drainage tracts, to include the
buffer within the Preserve tract. If the buffer is located within a
separate tract, that tract shall be dedicated on the plat to the project's
homeowners association or like entity for ownership and maintenance
respons~ilities and if necessary, to Collier County with no re. sponsroility
for maintenance. All Pre.serve buff.er easements et buff.er trac~ shall
be created in conformance with the provisions of Section 70-4.06,
Florida Statutes.
If SF'WMD relieves the County of matntenanc~ and enforcement
respons~ilitles the buffet may be located on lots and the following
stipulation will apply in place of the foregoing stipulation.
If (a) the SI x, VIvID jurisdictional wetlands are utilized as part et the
project's water management system, and Co) thc South Florida Water
Management District requires a natural upland buff.et adjacent to
wetlands, the buffer shall be included in the conservation tract et
otherwise protected in accordance with appllcabl¢ ordinances or
regulations. If the buffer is located within a separate tract, that Iract
shall be dedicated on the plat to the project's homeowners association
et other similar entity of ownership, maintenance ,nd enforcement
respons~ilJties with adequate safeguards to ensure that those
responsibilities run with the land. If the buff.et is located on lots of
development tracts, adequate safeguards ~hall be established to provide
for enforcement of clearing/alteration restrictions, with adequate
safeguards to ensure that those respons~ilitles run with the land, that
are acceptable to the South Florida Water Management District and
Collier County.
16
APR 0 1 1997
- . __J
!
S£C~ION IX
SUBDIVISION EXCEPTIONS
9.1
'the purT~ose o! this section b to llst .ppmv~d SUIXIi~sIQn
T~c ~ntrol ~: WI~ ~ ~cnu for ~ct
hi, rig ~ meet ~e ~.U.T.~, b~ ~ ~nt~J d~
~ic!¢ ~. Scion I?.F and O of ~e Su~ton ~e~a~ - S~et ~t-
of-Wsy ~dth: W~d to i m~mgm 50 f~t ~d~ Subjc~ to d~l~
don~ ~ e~rdan~ to th~ ~[~ ~on to mUcctor s~¢~
3. ~icl= ~, Secdon 1;.I of ~e Su~n Rc~I~ ' ~b ~: W~d
to a m~mum of 30 feet ~d[~ ~te~ ~d a ~vm
W~d subject to ~ u~d~ ~ ~ ~ ~
road~y payment ~d b~c.
· ~icle ~ Se~ion 10 of ~e Sub.ton Re~flo~ - Mon~cn~
svbje~ to monumcn~ ~mB~ ~ a~ ~th ~ofl~
~e Rule
6. ~tcle ~ Section 16 of ~e $u~ion Re~ '
17
L-%Itt I,I.T ~
· 1~ ROP~RTY {:)F~2:RIPTION ·
A P~R~ ~' ~D L~GA~O IN ~tE NORT~ I/4 OF ~E NOR~T I[~ OF
~C~ON ~, TO~IP 4B SOUTH, R~G[ ~ ~* ~LtIER ~' FLORID~
.BEING ~ORE pARTI~RLY oESCqIBED ~ FOLL~ '
TH LINE ~ ~tO ~CTION ~, F~R
~EN~ CONTINU: a- ~ ....... O ~ ~ FOR A ~~ ~
NO~ 1/4 ~ ~,NO THE NOR~ ~ < ~ ~
Ot~ ~ 11~? FE~ TO THE SO~H LI~ ~
PROPERTY AREA: ?.820, A.CR.ES, MOR~ OR I,.E~.
APR 0 1 1 97
PI. ~-~
APR 0 1 1997
COUNTY SUPPORT OF THE PROPOSAL BY THE FLORIDA GAME & FRESH WATER
FISH COMMISSION TO POST SHOREBIRD PROTECTION AREAS NEAR TIGERTAIL
PARK.
Fresh Water Fish Commission to post
near Tigertail Park.
CONBZD~RXTZONSI
On February 11, 1997, the Board reviewed the Florida Game & Fresh
the emer est sandbar near Tigertail Park £or P
.... ?_e m~ Board did not support this proposal an9
posted areas to exclude the overwash areas, limit the posting to
the summer months, and develop criteria to define why certain
areas are posted.
· attached March 5, 1997 letter from Mark Robson with the GFC
T~. ....... · ..... *~ ~ ~osted. (The area currently
t the sine Sand Dollar ~slana ]oAn~ u~? m~t,~ .... .
~- v.. ~J.*.fl~. These areas are located nom~_nw~s= o=
~i~S~..~--~ alonu the emerqent sandJ~.rs lMxng .~es= .o~
~-~-TT~ _F . -:--= o--~- ~edestrlan mass-~rougns are
provided ~tween ~hese areas. The execs ~ocn~A~nu m~2
adjusted depending on the exac~ bird usage.
ese areas were selected based upon the birds' need for nesting,
_Th ........ · .... ~-.4ties. The north and south areas, are
~e~{1ing ancl r,Bu~j
pro seed for nesting and are characterized by higher elevations,
dryPsand and shell fragments, and minimal vegetative cover.
The middle area is proposed as a feeding and resting area for the
il:ds. The tidal area is completely exposed during low tide and
b . - ........ ' the tidal ~-vcle. The intertidal
emalns · ose~ ~nrougn mosu ~&
r_.. xp ..... ----~--t invertebrate community that serves as a
food source for the shore and wading birds.
The posting of the nesting areas will be removed on_or a.ro. und
September 1, 1997 provided that the birds have completed nes=xng.
status of the middle feeding/resting area will be
seek county
crTheoe-ovsluated in December 1997. GFC pro. pos_e? to
n~enc-for posting new nesting area. Xn Fe-ruary~l
Executive Summary
12-Mar-199?
Page 2
Not applicable.
This action is consistent with the Goal 7 of the Conservation and
Coastal Management Element which addresses the protection of
fisheries and wildlife and Goal 11 which addresses the protection
of coastal resources.
The current proposal continues to provide protection to the
habitat of protected shorebirds. More public access is provided
within this current proposal than the prior propolal. Staff
finds that the GFC's current proposal provides a reasonable
balance between the protection of shorebird habitat and the
public's ability to access the area.
Staff, therefore, recommends that the Board support the GFC
proposal to post the areas as outlined in the attached March 5,
1997 letter from the GFC.
Prepared by Date:
P.E., Director
/Natural Resources Department
Approved by= ~ Date: ..~'" ~'~7
Vlncen~A. Cautero, Administrator,
Community Development and Environmental Services
Attachment
4)
;"
; .-~ o~d' /. ~.~.,, ,;:'
;
!PEDESTRIAN
· '-'"- PASS-THRU
} F2~ERGE~T SANDBARS
SUBMERGED BARS AXD
IXTERTtDAL kiUDFLATS
TIGERTAIL BEACH PARKIXG
BEACH ACCESS
GULF OF
MEXICO
EXIST1XG
ARF. A
BASED ON INFORMATION PROVlDED BY GAME
AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION STAFF 3-5-97
APR 0 1 1997
,,,._~
( (
FLORIDA GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COMMISSION
TIIOMAS B.
JULIE K. MORRIS
QUINTON I_ II£DGEPETII, DD$
Mla,,,I
{',IRS. GIL~KRT W. IIUMPImKY
Mleeosuk#
ALLAN I_ EGBERT, Ph.D,~ F.~utl~ D~.oe
William D. Lorenz Jr., P.E., Director
Natural Resources Department
Collier County Government
Building F, Government Center
3301 E. Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Dear Mr. Lorenz:
March 5, 1997
RECEIVED
ffAR 0 ( I997
NATl,~/:l RESOU~ES
OE PARI'r~EIIT
E'X'~RG ~ ~'~ REI3ION
LL COL. WOODROW J. DARD~4. I:himcs~
.~.m$S! N~nh Mil~y'f'~l
him Beach. FL 3~4t{
This letter is in response to your request, on behalf of the Collier County Board of
County Commissioners (County), for clarification regarding the posting of shorebird
protection areas near Tigertail County Pail:. As I understood from our telephone
conversations, the County has requested 3 things:
A revised map showing more clearly the areas that Florida Game and Fresh
Water Fish Commission (Gl:C) staff propose to post, including 2 pedestrian
pass-throughs for beachgoers.
An explanation of the rationale used by GFC staff to determine what areas
require posting for the protection of shorebirds.
3. A reaffirmation that the GFC will continue to coordinate the seasonal posting
of the Sand Dollar Island system in subsequent years.
The enclosed map shows recommended posted areas for nesting and overwintefing
shorebirds. We have included two pedestrian pass-throughs to accommodam the County's
concerns. Based on observations at the site, we ~ticipate that most people will access the
outer sandbar either by boat from the north tip (near Big lvlarco Pass channel), or by walking
across from Tigertail County Park, below the southern end of the proposed posted area.
Nonetheless, individuals who wish to cut throush the arr. a and feel it is too ftr to walk
uound will be directed to these two openings. The pass-throughs (approximately 30-50 yards
in width) are depicted on the ~ in locations deemed least likely to eliminate or din'upt
current wildlife use are. ts. Consistent with GFC practice, the exact locations may be adjusted
slightly to avoid important wildlife a~as at the time of actual posing.
1943- 1993 APR 0 1 1997'
50 YEARS AS STEWARD OF FLORIDA'S FISH AND WI{ ,DU{~ ~.
Mr. Will/am D. Lorenz
March $, 1~77
Pale Two
The sandbar and shoal system at Big Marco Pass, like ali such systems, is a rapidly
changing environment. Bird use changes with each minor shift in geogr~ohy, and with each
ebb and flow of the tide. What terrains constant is that some pan of the system Is critical for
shotebirds. The intent of GFC in establishing this area as at Critical Wildlife Area In 1988
was to identi~ an adequate geographical area, within which specific wildlife use areas
could be posted In response to ever-shifting conditions. This approach ensures that only
those parts of the system that are essentiaJ to ~oreblrds are restricted from human use at any
time, maximizing both the recreational potential of the area and wildlife protection. We hav~
consistently followed this approach since 1988.
The focus of GFC pos~ing efforts has been to identify and protect portions of the
system important to both nesting and wintering birds. Each group has sligbtiy different
requirements, although there usually ts some overlap of use for each. Four nesting species
occupy the highest elevations of sandbars, where they are lea~ likely to be affected by storrn
tides. They nest on the ground, and so prefer s. rea~ of dry sand and shell fragments, with a
minimal amount of vegetative cover. Because the actual posting process can be disruptive,
we try to identify likely nesting re'cas and rope them off Just prior to birds a.'Tiving
initiating courtship and egg-laying. The nes~ng reason begins a.round the last week of Ma~.h
and runs through August. The north and south areas depicted on the map encompau those
pans of the sandbar that appear to meet the biological requitemenU of our nesting species.
We have confidence in this judgement no~ only because the habitat appears suitable, but also
because most birds n_~empted to nest in simil~ a~eas of l~e sandbar during the previous two
nesting seasons,
for birds. Dudng each tidal d~n~_ ,~,..,_,,-.,~?_~.a_~.~.u? as a I .e.e.d. mg ano.resting area
~ ...... ,_ . -- -.---~-, ~am~ua uI MlOfeOIl"OS O~'UDV file e~'t~ne~,
,,~ts on me outer sa.n~tmr, and also between the '--~r -ind ..... '-'- ...... "~'"~
--- .,~.~w, a~a '~xpOIkl~. ~ ·
of a mixture of organic ms. terial sbel~ ~ ........... subslrale consists
At present, the winterin~ s. nd ~/dent
rtl thousand individuals reo~ntin, at I,'.--. ,~,t ----. ...... flats
or feednng and resttn, oocurs du~,.-. -~- -,-, ...... part.
Frovme · tdV. ali retuge imm ~uman foot trt~t, .......... -"-'"
total intertidal area presently acces~'ble to ~e~~hung tm' omy aoout ore-lenth of the
· APR011997
Mr. William D. Lorenz
March $, 1997
Page Th~
We continue to commit to coordinating the po~ng of this area with tM County on
annual basis, ~ we have for the last 3 yeah. However in contrast to the ne,rJng
which is w~ll-defined and of short du.ation, important feeding and resting are. aa are u~d
throughout tM year by a shifting cast of shorebird species; and since the bar and ~otl system
is constandy changing, our normal procedure would be to move tM feeding refuge In concert
with movement of intertidal trots, and in response to changes in f__eedlng activity. To addre~
County concerr~ we agree to evaluat~ tM status of tM proposed feeding area refuge in
December, 1997, and seek the concurrence of the County for any changes to this area. The
two nesting trea perlmeter~ on the outer tandbar will be removed on or around September 1,
1997 (provided all birds have complet, M nesting), and we will ~ek County concurrence for
posting new nesting areas in February 1998. Barring major changes to the system, we would
repeat this coordination proceu in subre, quent yeah.
I believe this addresses the concerns and questions raised by tM County. Should you
need additional information, or have any other questions, please feel free to contact me at
($61)640.6100. I will be out of the office from March I0 - 21, but I would be happy to
answer questions regarding our request, or to review any materials pr~ared for tM County
Commissioners, after that time. We am anxious to obtain Collier County's concurrence for
the protection of this important wildlife resource as roon a~ possible. Thank you for your
Regional Nongame Wildlife Biologist
WLD 4-2-5
Lt. Col. Woodrow Darden, GFC
Mr. Jim Fetertag, GFC
Ms. Traey Peter, Florida Depamnent of Environmental Protection
NO.~
APR 0 1 1997
GULF
of'
MEXICE]
APR 0 1 1~7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO WAIVE THE SECURITY FOR EXCAVATION PERMIT $9.244,
"FLORIDA SPORTS PARK LAKE", LOCATED IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
To present information to the 13oard of County Commissioners in support of a request by the "Collier
County ,~unior Deputies Lea~" (CCJDL) to waive the performance bond for excavation permit
59.244.
CONSIDERATIONS:
Excavation Permit 59.244 dates from March 1986. The excavator removed the overburden (the soil),
exposing the caprock at a depth of what presently appears to be 5 to 7 feet below original grade, and
then stopped.
In 1~3 a series of enforcement actions were undertaken by the former Development Services
Department staff. There appears to be a gap in the correspondence record, and in August 1995, Mike
Kirby, acting Code Enforcement Supervisor issued a letter that the County is closing out the matter and
considering Florida Sports Park to be in substantial compliance.
The excavation is not in compliance and at every development order pre-application meeting
Community Development staff asks that the lake be brought into compliance and the sports park
responds that they cannot afford to bring the lake into compliance.
The CCJDL has now apparently solved our problem. By getting Southern Sand & Stone (SSS) Willow
Run Quarry to excavate the lake for the fill contained, the lake can be brought into compliance.
Tltis excavation appears to be a break-even proposition for SSS. With the overburden removed,
blasting the exposed rock must be done carefully, and the resultant pieces will be larger than for a
confined blast. The approximate cost ofblasting the $+/- acres will be about $100,000.00
SSS will then remove about 116,000 c.y. ofmaterial (to a depth ofabout 20 fl. below existing grade, or
13 to 15 additional feet), load it on trucks and haul it via the FPL Power Line easement to the Willow
Run QuanT for crushing. This operation should cost at least $1.50/c.y., effectively canceling out any
profit SSS will make.
The CCJDL is an extracurricular function of the Collier County SherifFs o~ce (CCSO). Staff'has been
attempting to secure code compliance regarding the lake for years. In light of the involvement of the
CCSO, tnd the reputation of Southern Sand & Stone, staffhighly recommends waiving the performance
bond as an incentive to getting this job done.
s
APR 0 1 1997
FISCAL IMPACT:
The County will realize no revenues from this project, nor will there be any cost incurred by waiving
this bond.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
None
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Thai the Board of County Commissioners waive the Secugty for Excavation Permit 59.244 Florida
Sports Park.
STAN CHRZANOWSKI.
SENIOR ENGINEER
DATE
REVIEW~ED BY:
THOMAS F,. KUCK, P.E.
ENGINEERING REVIEW SERVICES
WR "
'~NCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINISTRATOR
COMMUNITY DEV. AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS.
DATE
DATE
2
APR 0 11997'
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
REPORT TO THE BOARD ON THE STATUS OF THE COUNTYWIDE SIGNAL
SYSTEM CONTRACT AND ON-GOING PROGRAMS AND RESEARCH FOR
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN COLLIER COUNTY.
~ To provide the Board with background information and a report on the
status of the recently funded FDOT Countywide signal system study. In addition, to
provide an assessment of potential Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
technologies availability and applicability for Collier County.
CONSIDERATIONS: Changes in technology have advanced to the point where
Collier County must consider how these technological advances will impact ongoing
maintenance and operation of the County's mobility systems. The phrase most often
used to describe this new technology is Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS).
Among the advantages inherent in embracing ITS concepts are:
1. Improved travel information for both the public and the maintaining agency (Collier
County).
2. Quicker emergency response as a result of implementing "smart" signal systems
and 'smart" vehicle control systems.
3. Improved traffic flow along the "backbone" arterial roadway network.
4. Fewer traffic jams as enhanced traffic management centers monitor current
conditions in real time and adjust for traffic conditions.
5. Improved large vehicle management which would permit direct communication
among supervisors, dispatchers and drivers of emergency and service vehicles,
busses and semi-trailers.
6. Faster delivery of goods and services along with improved safety management.
Many of these types of advan¢;ed systems are presently either in place or under
development in other parts of Florida, the United States and the rest of the world.
Collier County has the opportunity to begin upgrading our systems and procedures
along with the opportunity to take advantage of these recent developments in
hardware and software. The Board recently approved advance funding in the amount
of $275,000 to assist the FDOT in moving forward with a Countywide study to provide
a basis for future signal system improvements.
Attached for your review is an example of one manufacturer's product which uses ITS
technology to aid in traffic control and traffic counting. This example is typical of some
of the recent innovations in the control technology market.
As Collier County develops from a series of suburban developments into an urban
area. both the Roadway System and the Traffic Operations System must provide
needed capacity to fulfill Level of Service (LOS) requirements as set ;orth in the
Growth Management Plan. The Roadway System and the Traffic Operat! ,,'= ¢=,,,,,A--
haw been and continuo to be the subiect of a series of improvements to e
APR' ~"i 3997
~._J.------
Executive Summary
Future Signal System
Page 2
expand roadways and intersections to maintain a LOS which meets or exceeds l:he
typical minimum LOS standard of 'D" on the arterial network.
As the Roadway System expands to a build-out condition (usually six through lanes
on many arterial roadways), the corresponding Traffic Operations System must also
expand to provide for new and enhanced signal systems where mainarte and side
street access conditions warrant. Accordingly, over the past several years the number
of signalized intersections has grown to over 110 signal systems within the Urban
Area. New signal installations have been increasing at a rate of approximately 15%
per year. To assure that the capacity of the arterial road system is maintained, the
Transportation Services Department has actively implemented intersection
improvements, access controls and signal system interconnect planning.
Intersection improvements usually consist of added turn lanes, renewed or improved
pavement markings, auxiliary signing and similar measures. Access controls consist
of median opening spacing controls, driveway connection spacing and geometry
controls and minimum spacing controls for traffic signal placement. Signal system
interconnects, thus far, have been one of two basic types: hard-wire interconnects
(physically connected signal systems and intersections); time-based interconnects
(signals and intersections "connected" by manipulation of the timing sequences
between adjacent signals). Both types of interconnect systems have been designed
for expansion to permit upgrading to a hard-wire (fiber-optic cable) closed-loop
(central microprocessor-controlled) system.
There are several areas presently served by both hard-wired and time-based
interconnected sub-systems. Examples of these are'.
Hard-Wired Systems:
U. S. 41 E. (Airport Road to Palm Drive)
Goodlette-Frank Road (U.S. 41 to Golden Gate Parkway)
1-75 Ramp Intersections (CR 951 and Pine Ridge Road)
Time-Based Systems:
Airport Road (U.S. 41 to Golden Gate Parkway)
Golden Gate Parkway (50t~ Street to Sunshine Boulevard)
Radio Road (Commercial Boulevard to King's Way)
The existing systems, including those outlined above, are currently operated and
maintained as part of the Transportation Department's Traffic Operations Section. The
personnel assigned are two Senior Traffic Technicians and one Maintenance Worker.
Normal maintenance includes programming of signal phasing and individual signal
maintenance by either telephone line connections or individual site visits. Them are
twenty-three telephone connections either in place or on order. Over time, more
intersections will be equipped with telephone lines so that site visits may be
minimized.
Executive Summary
Future Signal System
Page 3
Recent engineering reports reviewed by this office and our excellent relationship with
the City of Naples Traffic Operations Department, which maintains the City's closed-
loop signal system, provides evidence that the most appropriate system for the future
will be the continued implementation of a City- and County-wide closed-loop signal
system, possibly in coordination with other technologies. The Board's recent action in
approving advance funding for the FDOT City- and County-wide Signal System Study
is one of the most important steps in assuring future Federal and State funding of
such a closed-loop signal system utilizing the latest ITS concepts and technology. The
system would be capable of serving the entire Collier-Naples Urbanized Area.
Additionally, a closed-loop signal system will meet the Congestion Management
Strategies of the MPO with respect to both mobility enhancement and congestion
management. Signal system performance criteria will include response to through-
traffic volume, annual average daily traffic (AADT) counts, seasonal volume
fluctuations, time of day volume fluctuations, roadway and intersection LOS
measurement for concurrency management, delay condition assessment,
construction conditions and other traffic and roadway factors on a continuous 24-hour
basis rather than on the existing peak periods as presently performed.
It is prudent to bear in mind that even with the implementation of a closed-loop signal
system and other ITS technologies, improvements will be measured in relatively small
increments rather than in leaps and bounds. System-wide improvements on the order
of several percent can be expected. Individual roadway segments and, especially,
individual intersections will see improvements relative to both geometric constraints
and overall traffic volumes. Put another way, if atdp from one end of Airport Road
now takes twenty minutes, technology enhancements could reduce that travel time by
ten to fifteen percent, or from twenty minutes to seventeen or eighteen minutes. The
trip will never get down to ten or eleven minutes.
I~tSCAL IMPACT; It is not the purpose of this report to solicit funding or to
recommend defined budget items for these improvements. Rather, the
implementation of a computerized closed-loop signal system is consistent with the
typical phasing of all capital projects. The project will begin with a Feasibility Study
and follow through with the Design Phase, Utility Coordination Phase, and Bidding
and Construction Phases - possibly 10 phases over a period of 10 to 15 years.
Depending on implementation parameters and task phasing, the total project cost is
anticipated to be in the range of $5,000,000 to $10,000,000. AccordIngly, local
funding for the overall project will be driven by the availability of both Federal and
State funding. The first phase of the work, about to begin, is the FDOT Feasibility
Study originally scheduled in FY 99~00. This study is being fast-tracked by the FDOT
based on the County advancing funds of $275,000 as approved by the Board on
November 5, 1996 (Item 8A5). In addition, the Board has already approved sidewalk,
intersection and other signal system improvements and enhancements in ~ast budget
cycles. Each year, Staff brings forth additions or revisions to those in-pla¢
in response to the changing needs of the roadway and signal systems. ~o.,.-~
APR 0 I ~:,,
Executive Summary
Future Signal System
Page 4
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT; Capacity exists within the County's arterial road
system to the extent that the need for a County-wide closed-loop/ signal system to
satisfy present concurrency requirements is not within the County's'present Five-Year
CIE. A mobility analysis indicates that a portion of the closed-loop system could be
implemented for additional segments of Airport-Pulling Road, Pine Ridge Road,
Golden Gate Parkway and U. S. 41 East. If, in the future, a decision is made by the
Board to implement these portions of the system and if additional major funding can
be secured from Federal and State Sources, the savings in reduced travel time delays
and increased safety of operations is expected to exceed the initial implementation
cost. The savings would be manifested as less air pollutants emitted at intersections,
less gasoline wasted at stops, incremental decreases in travel time and fewer
congestion-related crashes.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners, through the MPO,
support the goal of developing an interconne~J~d traffic~ignal system and the use of
ITS technology for~ and e~ems operations.
PREPARED BY: '~~Y DATE: ~ '._~_~?
Edw~rd J. Kan/~/~eni~r Engineer
REVIEWED BY: /(.,~'-'i~ ~'.~.),c~,,'~ L · . . .
David F. Bobanick, Interim Transportation Services Director
REVIEWED Ra, y~ond W. Miller, P.E., Interim Public Works Administrator
Michael A. McNees, Intedm (~o~nty Manager
Attachments: No. 1 - Copy of AutoscopeTM Brochure
APR 0 ! 1997
What is machine
vision?
Machine vision, also known as Image
processing or ~iflcial vision, Is a technology
that combines video imaging w~
computer[zed pa~tem recognition. By using
video cameras and computers to emulate the
function of the human eye, machine vision
Offers a plaffoml for countJess reaJ.life
ap~catione.
In 1987. w~ demonstrated the first working
traffic application of machine vision. The goal
was to allow wlde-ama vehicle detection and
Vaffic parameter extraction without the high
Insta.qation and maintenance costs of
embedded senso~. In the subsequent years.
the Autoscope" lechnotogy was relined to
meat customer demands for features.
pedom'ance, new functk~s, and affordabilib/.
Today's fou~-generat~ Autoscope" is
desig~ Io suppcxl the complex applications
older, less capable technologies. .:
What Does Autoscope Do?
crosses one of these virtual ds;actors. O
The core of the Autoscope"' detection system
is an image processor -- a box that contains
the microprocessor, based CPU, specialized
image processing boards, and software, lo
analyze video images. The unit fits in an outdoor
traffic cabinet and accepts video signals from
multiple roadside video cameras.
Using a mouse and Interactive graphics, the
user sets up Autoscope'" by placing 'virtual
detectors' on the video image displayed on a
monitor. Each det~'lor rep~sents a zone - either
e wide-area zone or a short zone that in the
simplest form emulates an inductive Iccp. For
most practical applications, there is virtually no
limit to the number of zones (100 or more) that
can be assigned to an Autcscope'" processor.
These detection zones are distributed among
the cameras 1o meet the needs of traffic
applications. Once the system is set up. a
detection signaJ is generated each tJma a vehicle
Autoscope' p, ocessor anayzes the incoming
video images to generate traffic Cate such as
volume, speed, occupancy, headv.'ays, queue
lengths, and vehicle c~ss~c,~.tion,
Information from the various zones c~ ~ be
combined into logical operations (AND. OR.
NAND. N of M), The detection signal can be
delayed o~ extended, or system behavkx can
be enabled and disabled by the phasing state
ranging fn3m sophisticated tra~c-flow analysis
t~ management and planning.
The new Autoscope" 200~ works with e~dsting
computer systems and he,york architeclums.
Optional ScopeServer" for V',qnc~.;,s"' so~','are
makes it economical to deve!op and ~
applications that use Autoscoce" output fo~
lunct;,t~,de:e=i=n' and '0
is a prove~,t system with
of sites k3 Ncxl~
Ame,'ic~ Europe and
the Fa~ Ee. st.
Them are two main masons to choose
Autoscope' over tmd~x',a] detection systems:
Cost-effective,
reliable
peHormance
Autoscope '" Is dependable, economical, and
versat~e. It has gained wide recognition over
othe~ t~les for conv~ti~ and ITS
models, thanks to the use of integrated
~ts ~ higher, voh.~ne manure.
Image Sensing
Systems, Inc.
Image Sensing Systems (1SS). the company
behind Autoscope". Is a speciar~zed resean:h
and development finn with expertise in image
processing, hardware and so~'e desert, and
Minnesota Depa,lrneM ~~t~n'~l~'u
strategic alruu'~ce (~ E~~ ~
distnt~ution of Autoscope" in the United State~
e
(midol). A~e~ Zone Mana~' ~e~t), Commun/.
c~m Sen~ St~n~ t~s~y (~9~t).
Aries - The Next
Generation
A~es, introduced in July 1996, is the latest
and most powerful traffic surveilJance and
data management sofiwe,'e by Econolite. It is
· 32-bit Mic~soft Windows® application,
v,'hich taJces full advantage of the sn-aphical
user interface znd multitasking capabilities
of Windows 95 and Windows NT. It can also
operate under the 16-bit W~ndows environ-
sent.
Like Zone blonitor iV. which preceded it.
Aries pays for itself many times over through
more efficient t~ffic flow, b~tter utilization
of existinj tra~c facilities, reduced down-
time, e~d savings in labor.
Features & Benefits
· Graphical user Interface
and dialog boxes provide
unmatched ease of use.
Window~ allows display of
multiple operations, Includ-
Ing real-time zone map and
Intersection display~.
Intersection displays can
be launched from zone
map display.
Dialog boxes can show
real-time alphanumeric
data on demand, thus al-
lowing simpler graphical
displays.
System monitor and event
scheduling tasks can run
in background while other
tasks run in foreground,
Including applications
other than Aries.
Optimized for 32-bit opera-
tion under Windows 95 &
Windows NT, but compat-
ible with 16-blt Windows
3.1.
· Compatible with Zone
Monitor IV data files.
Powerful detector logging,
event logging, end event
scheduling features.
A superb tool to diagnose
traffic equipment, upload,
edit & download database
files, and optlmtze traffic.
ECONOLITE
CONTROL PRODUCTS. INC,
Compatibility with Zone
Monitor IV
Aries is ide~ for completely nr~' ~.st~rm or
for upgradinj existinl Zone .~o~tor tv' ~.~
terns. It is desired to ~ installe~ in ~ ~
disk dir~t~ ~ Zone Monit~ ~: It ~
utilize all ~ta files and ~Fhi:s flies in ~
di~cto~, wi~ ~e exception of ~nfi~s
Scheduler setup d3tz
If you a~ a Zone Monit~ ~' user..~es ~ll
safe~u~ and enhance ~e investment ~a
y~ have a~3d7 made in se:hn~ up )~
~c system.
Ades Zone MaMger flx~om lefO, Leg FW Ma~
ager (Top mid~e). Events Log D~:a Windo~
(bottom mid~), Vdume and ~ De.
tec~ Log Data W"a,~'ow (top).
~ ~11.10142M-00
3360 E. La Palms. Anaheim, CA 92806-2856
P.O. Box 6150, Anaheim, CA 92816-0150
Te!epho~e: (714) 630-3700 Fax: C/~4l~./, ...
_EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY I~LANAGER TO
ENTER INTO A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE MEMORANDUM OF
AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(FDOT) FOR LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION LOCATED ON A PORTION
OF STATE HIGHWAY 84 (DAVIS BOULEVARD).
~ Adoption ora Resolution authorizing the County Manager to enter into a
Landscape Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement with FDOT for the installation and
maintenance of landscaping and iffigation located on a one mile portion of State Highway
84 (Davis Boulevard) between U.S. 41 and Airport-Pulling Road.
CONSIDERATIONS: On September 17, 1996 [Agenda Item 8 (B) (4)] the Board
adopted a Resolution, No. 96-427, authorizing the County Manager to apply for a
l-L~ghway Beautification Grant, fi.om the F.D.O.T., for median landscaping of Davis
Boulevard. This new Resolution is to provide maintenance for the median landscaping.
FISCAL IMPACT: This Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement will require $$6,000
per year for landscape maint:~nance of this one (1) mile section of S.R. 84. If the one-time
$150,000 grant match for the landscaping project [Ret'. 9/17/96 Agenda, Item 8 (B) (4)]
were paid for out of County-wide Facilities Capital (301) Funds (i.e. a transfer fi.om the
General Fund) in FY 98, and the maintenance costs were paid for fi.om Road District 3
(Golden Gate, Golden Gate Estates, and East Naples) funds, the annual maintenance
costs, assuming no new construction, would represent a tax increase of' approximately
.0187 mils, or $1.87 per $100,000 of'taxable value. Other funding options may include
creation ora special taxing or assessment district.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners adopt the attached
Resolution authorizing the County Manager to enter into a Landscape Maintenance
Memorandum of Agreement with FIX)T for landscaping and irrigation located on a one
mile portion of State i-lighw~ 84 (Dads B~ulevard) and give staff' direction on fueding.
Geg'~g~ H. P~4cer," Senior Project Manager
REVIEWED BY:
Office of Capital Projects Management
DaviSF. Bobanick, Interim
Trans/~a~" ' ~P~.E Director
Adolf'o A. GO Director
Offi_ce of' Capital'l~_ jects Management
Interim Public Wori~ ^dminimtor
REVIEWED BY:
Iml,'~vld)l~LO I
Date:
I RESOLUTION NO. 97 -
2
.~ A RESOLUTION OF TIlE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION£RS OF
4 COLI.I£R COUNTV, FLORIDA AUTIIORIZING TIlE COUNTY
s ADMINISTRATOR TO ENTER INTO A L~NDSCAPE MAINTKNANC£
6 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITll TIlE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
? TRANSPORTATION FOR TIlE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF
I LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION LOCATED ON A PORTION OF STATE:
9 HIGII~VAY 84 (DAVIS BOULEVARD) BET~¥EEFi U.S. 41 (EAST TAMIAMI
to TRAIL) AND AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD ~,VITIiIN COLLIER COUNTY,
tl FLORIDA; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATF..
12
13 WIIKREAS, many roadside areas and median strips within the Department or
14 Transportation, State Road 84 (Dav~s Bard.) right.or-way are capable of receiving and
13 sustaining landscape beautification features, and
16 WHEREAS, Ihe Board or County Commissioners desltes that Collies' County
I? participate in Ihe beautification of` this highway'$ median strips w~thin Collier County
II Ihrough landscape development, and
19 ¥(IIERKAS, the Board or Coumy Commissioners intends, by the adoption of'this
20 Resolution, to authorize the County Administrator to enter into a Highway Landscape
21 Maintenance Memorandum oF Agreement and a Highway Beautification Grant
22 kfemorandum of'Agreement between Collier County. Florida. and the Florida Department
2~ nf`Tran$l,ortation.
24 h'O~¥, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TIlE BOARD OF COUNTY
25 COMMISSION'ERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT:
26 Section I: The Board oir County Commissioners hereby authorizes the County
27 Administrator to enter into a Highway Landscape Maintenance Memorandum Gl'
2a Agreement and Highway Beautil~cation Grant Memorandum of Agreement with the
29 Florida Department ot' Transportation, pertaining to median strips along a I mile section
30 of' SR 84 (Davis Boulevard between U.S. 4 I) and Airport-Pulling Road within Collier
31 County, Florida.
32 Section 2: The Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners is hereby
3~ directed to forward a certified copy of` this Resolution to Ihe Florida Department or
34 Transportation, Barrow, as a result of` having been awarded and accepting a Highway
35 Beautification Grant.
36 Section 3: This Resolution shall take etTec~ive immediately upon adoption.
APR 0 1997
7
!
9
In
Il
12
17
Tills R£SOLUTION ADOPTED Tills DAY OF
1997 AFTER MOTION, SKCONI~ A~;r) MAJORITY ¥OT~.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Approved as to form
~ legal su~ciency
.~.~i~co~/'^~o~
By:
Timothy L. Hancock, AICP
Chairman
EXECUTIVE SUMbIARY
STATUS REPORT ON ODOR CONTROL AT SCRWTP
O.]L~,_C,.T~I_~ That the Board of County Commissioners, ag the Ex-Officio
Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, receive a staff
report on the status of providing odor control at the South County Regional
Water Treatment Plant (SCRWTP).
CONSIDERATIONSi The Board requested information regarding the timing to
install odor control facilities at the SCRWTP per agenda item 14(A) on March
18, 1997. At that meeting, staff estimated a completion date of January, 1998.
The Board then directed staff to return with a report on the operational
feasibility of options to complete the project earlier.
Staff is prepared to present the following options for accelerating the schedule:
1. Bid as turn-key delivery, and
2. Declare an emergency.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None.
RECOMMENDATIONS; That the Board of County Commissioners, as the Ex-
Officio governing board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, direct staff
to proceed with the selected approach to project delivery.
BY:
Offiq~ of Capital P[pjects Management
Adolfo A.~Oo~[zalez, P.E.~)ire~:'(or 9ATE:
Office of Cap,iai Projects Management
~aymond . Miller, P.E., Interim Administrator ' '
Public Works Division
REVIEWED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
KWB:kwb
CC: Steve Carnell, Purchasing
Mike Newmnn, Water Director
APR 0 ! 1997
~,~,I~: To appoint 2 members to 4 year terms and I member to fulfill the r~malndcr ora
vacant term on the Immokalee Enterprise Zone Dcvelopmen~ Agency (EZDA)
CONSIDERATIONS-: This 13 member commi~ was created on Mar~h 2~, 199f, by
Ordinance 95-22 ~o induce private investment into dist~ssed areas to create economic
opportunities and sustainable economic development for designated ~. To permit Collier
County ~o participate in this program, the Board or' County Commissionem nominated the
Immokalee Community to be considered by the Florida Department of Commerce for Enterprise
Zone designation in Resolution No. 9~-24g, approved March 28, 1995. As pan ofthe formal
application for an Enlerprise Zone, the State r~quired that a committ~ consisting of a broad base
of citizens be established. The committee has representation from the Chamber of Commerce,
financial or insurance entities, businesses operating within the nominated area, residents living
within the nominated area, nonprofit community-based organizations operating within the
nominated area, local private industry council, local code enforcement agency, and local law
enforcement agency.
A list of the current membership is included in the backup.
A memorandum was received from June G-oodwin, HU1 Manager, Housing & Urban
Improvement requesting the Board to confirm the following appointments:
(~OMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Reappointment: Denise Blanton - 4 years, expiring on March 28, 2001, representing resident.
New appointment: Raymond Holland of Florida Community Bank,- 4 years expiring on March
2~, 2001, representing a financial entity; replacing Steve Price.
New appointment to fulfill remainder of vacant term: Jim Penczykowski of Immokalee Non-
Profit Housing - balance of vacated term (Jose G-omez), expiring on March 28, 1999,
ru-pres~nting business in zone.
FISCAL IMPACt: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEMlr. NT IMPACT: NONE
[~COMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment; appoint 3 members to the EZDA; and di~ct the County
Attorney to prepare a resolution conftrming the appointments.
Prepared By: Sue Filson
Date: April 1, 1997
APR - 1
PQ.__/__-.-
Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency
Name
Fred N. Thomu, Sr. 657-3649
1800 Farm Worker Way
Immokalee, FL 34142
C~re~o~: Non Pmfit O~on
L~ O~
I~o~ ~ 34t42
~ p~ 657-3671
~o~ee, FL 34i42
D~: 5
EdCo Te~ 2624636
1065 5~ A~nue No~ 657.5~2
N~i~, FL 34102
C=ffo~: B=iness in Zone
S~ ~ 657-3171
14~ No~ 15~ S~t
~o~, FL 34142
M~ L~ 657.3588
313 New M~k~
rmmo~ FL 34142
~e BI.mn 657-33~
N~lm, ~ 34120
Work Pltont ,~ppt'd Exp. Date Ttrm
Home l~Aone Oa~eRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Tt~
04104195 0~6 1 Y~
9/3/96 0~0~00 4 Ye~
04/04/95 04/04/99 4 Yeats
04/04/95 04/04/99
04/04/95 04/04/99 4 Yeats
04/04/95 04/04/97 2 Yeas
04/04/95 04/04/98 3 Years
04/04/95 04/04/97 2 Yesr~
APR ' 1 1997
Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency
Name
Work Phone ,4ppt'd Exp. Date l'erm
Home Phone DateRe-nppt 2ndE. vpDate 2nd Term
09/03/96 04/03/99 3 Years
Tint Nevarez 658-3515
P.O. Box 1032
Immokalee, FL 34133
District:
Category: Private Industry Council
$oseph Lozano 657-2742
403 North lSth Street
[mmo~lee, FL 34142
District:
Category: Non Profit Or$.a;njzation
lose Oomez //f#¢,~n~, e57-8107
1212 North lfth Street
[mmokalee, FL 34142
Category: Non Profit Organization
Ray Kipp 657.2878
1125outh 1st Street 657-8168
lmmoka~ee, EL 34142
Di~t~lct:
Category: Loc~ Law Ea~'orcemcnt
Cazol Loss deLara 658-1313
$06 Ist Strut, South
Lem~o~ee, FL 34142
Category: Chamber of Commerce Presideat
Gary Han'ison 643-8445
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34112
District:
Category: Local Code £nfo~ement
04/04/95 04/04/99 4 Yeats
04/04/95 04/04/99 4 Years
04/04/95 04/04/98 3 Yeats
09/03/96 04/04/99 3 Years
09/93/96 04/04/99 3 Yeats
Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency
Work Phone .4ppt'd Exp. Date Term
Name Home Phone Da:eRe.appt 2ndExpDa:e 2nd I'erm
This l~member commiltee was created on April 4, lggs. by Ord. No. 95-22 to induce privato
investment into distressed areas to create economic opportunities and sustainable economic
development for designated areas. Initial members were appointed by Resolution No, 95-249.
To permit Collier County to participate in this program, the Board of County Commissionem
nominated the Immokalee Community to be considered by the FL Dept. of Commerce for
Enterprise Zone designation in Raso. No. 95-248, approved March 28. 1995. As part of the
formal app for an EZ, the State required that a committee consisting of a broad ba~lof citizens be
established. The committee has representation from the Chamber of Commerce, financial or
Insurance entities, businesses operating within the nominated area, residents, nonprofit
community-based organizations, local private industiy council, local code enforcement agency,
and local law enforcement agency. Terms ara 4 years.
Sta.~7': Greg Mihalic. HUI Director:. 643-8330
Fhar~rla7. Se~eem~ OS, 1~96
APR - 1 1 g7
TO:
FROM:
DATg:
M~MORANI) UM
Sue Filson, Administrativ~ Assist~t
Boazd of County Commissioucrs
ousi~g & Urban lrn;m~vtment
Much 15, 1997
lmmokaic~ F. utcrpri~ Zon~ IX'veldt ASeK'/(EZDA)
RECT'
The State has enacted n program, the Florida En~ Zone Program to induce private investment into
distressed areas to create e:onomic oppormniti,s and suminable ecooomic development for designated
a~as. To p~mit Collier County to participate i,, this pro.am the Bom~ of County Commisstouet's
nominated th~ Immohalc~ Commu~ty to be considered by ibc Florida Dil~msent of C~ f(x
Enterprise Zone designation La Resolution No. 95-248, approved M,vv.h 28, 1995. As pan of the formal
application for an Entcq:n'ise Zone, ;he State ruluired fl~t n comminne consisting ofl broad b~e of
citizens be esublLshed. This Board has representation from the Chamber of ~ flnancisl or
m nOal~afit community-based organizatioa~ openting within t~ aomi~'~! ~ Io¢~1 privatt imluatry
~ Ioe~! cod~ enforcement agency. ~nd Ioeal l~w calory'meat
The Committee was created through Ordinance 95-22 ~s the lmmokalee Enterprise Zone Develofenent
Agency (EZDA). la addition, the County Council appointed members to the E2~A under Resolution
249.
Two member's trrms have expired and two members resigned from the EZDA. We ate therefore,
recommending the following for Board approval to fill thn'e of the tour vacancies at this time:
1. Reappoint Denise Blanton, whose two ),eat t~m expiz~ to a new tout y~at term (Mirth 28, 1997 to
Mttch 28, 2001.) This position must be filled with a resident and Ms. Blanton meets this
2. Steve Price, whose two yeat term expired, will be unable to continue to serve. The EZDA is
recommending the appointment of l~ymond Holland of the Florida Couauanity Banlg for the term
beginning March 28. 1997, tad ending Mzm:h 28, 2001. This position must be fdled by someone
representing a Financial entity. Mr. Holland meets this
3. Mt. lose Gomez resigned leaving the b~lance of bis t~m to be filk, d (Mazch 28, 1997 - Match 28,
1999). The ~Z~A is recommending the appointment of Mr. Iim PenczTkowski oflmmokalee Non-
Profit Housing for the balance of term. The incumbent tx-presents a non-profit as tequite:L
4. Edsazdo Tenr~iro, resigned leaving the balance of his term to be filled (Match 28, 199'/- Ms,ch 28,
1999). The appointee for this position must represent · business in zone. The EZDA will be Iookial
to £md an individu·l who ~ulfilis this requirement. We will inform you when the EZDA hu made ·
selection.
Please prtlm~ nn Executive Summary for the Borers coasiamt~ ofthe as:ee~meda~o~ md k~ me
know if any farther information or assistsacc is neeted te initiate the process. Thank 7~u for lmm help.
cc: Greg Mihalic, Director, Housing & Urban Impmvemeat
Vincent A C. autero, Administrator, Comnmnity IX, velopme~ ~d Eavitoamenta! ~ _
Fred Thomas, EZDA Chaizman
APR-I IBB7
pg. ,.~'''"
Mar. 10. 19~? 12:d~ F~
OBJECT~¥E~
EDUCA?ION ~
EXP£RI£NCE~
of
3AHES L. PENCZYKOWSKI
1108 HONROE STREET
It~O~ALEE, FLORIDA 34142
(941)657-2999
~anagement experience and training.
~.A., $~. Fraaci$ dsS&les College,
rtil~auke~, W! (1971)= Ma~or in Theology.
Th.H., St. Francis Seminary, School of
Pastoral }$inlstry, Htlvaukeo, ~] (1975);
~aJor in Theological Appropriation of ~he
5chariots1 Sciences.
Cran~ Hospital Training Program for
addiction Counselors, ChJcago, IL (1981-2)
Over 200 ~ou:s of lnsarvice Crainin~ in
health care ~anagement from 1984-92 be-
tween !npalls Hemorial flospl~al in Ha~¥ey,
IL and Heri~er ~ospttal in Hadtson, ~!
vl~h special emphasis on ~otal quality
provemenc methodology.
1994-!996, Projcct Coordinator of Collabo
retire Gran~ for thc Collier Count~ Pre-
):inderga:ten lnteragency Coordinating
Com~cil. In this rol~, I havo ~rttten
all grant applications and reports,
established and monitored th~ budge~, and
maintained the focus o£ ~he 'Interagenc~
Council on the goals o~ the grant,
enhancing the quality of preschool
environments county-aide.
]986-92, Hanagor o; ~eriter Hospital,
NevStart Residential Center, (Hadtson, ~I)
an inpatient program for treatmen~ o£
chemical dependency. Responsibilities in-
cluded all aspects of clinical supervision
and facility management, as veil as n&in-
~alning OCAH0 accreditation and state
licensure and certification.
1981-6, Counselor and Clinical Supervisor
at Ingalls ~lsmorial Hospital Alcoholism
T£eatment Center, Harvey, IL
1975-610 Associate Pastor, I~macult~e
suburb o£ Hllv&u~ee) vhere one accomplish-
APR - ! i997
1997 12:4
ACTIVITYg
Hospital~ some 80 volunteers were involved
over the ftrsC ~our years of ~ts
existence.
Currently serving on t~e CollJlr County
Public I{~alth Unit Advisory
~993-pres~n~, servin~ on board of
direc~ors of Immo~alee Developmen~11
Services,
Currently serving on ~he Co~]ier County
Rural Health ~etvor~.
Spring of 1994, served on th~ environmen~
committee during ~he drafting of the pgo-
~)osed empovermen~ zone for l~o~llee,
;987-92, served o~ the board of d~rec~ors
Luke House, Inc. in t~ad~son, wi, a
communtt7 meal progra~ serving over 150
p~ople per day a~ ~o separ&~e sites.
Available on request.
Raymond T. Holland
19,94. Current Fkxtcla Commun~ 5.nk
. l~'~k ~ ~ focus o~ Lm'gling FuncU~
· C;tizen ~e Bank MdVlkm'v~, Tenne~ee 1972-80
Immakalee Flork~a
1972 Graduate Tennessee Tecl~nologlcal Ufitvtmty Co~kevflle, Tenne~ee
Vadous
ISoa~! of Directors Good~ll Industdes
Col~ier CO. Fak Boa~l af Dlmcl~
Immokalee C.J~amt~er of Commen:e Board of Dlmc~
Conier Co. EDC Com~ Membeeship
HabttaL Chamber. Fair, Festivals, Chumh etc.
APR - 1 ~997
IIIti)INAN¢'I:, N¢1 o~.
AN ORItlNANC1~. IL~TA$11.1RIIIN(1
I~N I'I~ItPRISI~ ZONI~
(I~7.OA): PROVIDING FOR
()FFIC~; PROVIDING FOR R~ktOVAI.
PR~EDUR~; PROVIDING
DA~
W11EREAS. Ihe State Go~'rnme~ k~s enacted a ~am. I~ ~a Em~
Z~ Proem. (S~i~ 2~.~t - 2~.016. ~odd~ St~tm~)
~le ~o~m~ ~unlti~ s~ ~ai~ble ~mlc
~EREA$, Ihe Bonrd ofC~nty Commlsslon~ of Cofll~ C~ly
the Im~kal~ Communily ~o ~ ~nsid~ by Ihe ~oddn ~n~t of Comm~ for
Enl~dse Zone Deslln~tlon: ~nd
~IEREAS. a bro~d b~se ordttz~ p~icipsi~n hal ~ ~tnbfls~ as a p~ or
I~ effo~ IO apply For the F~e~l Oo~mem Em~m~t Zo~nt~pd~a
Com~nity d~i~n~lion ~nd has b~ ~tc~ed inlo Ihls agpfic~tion to ~t~in
Ente~se Zone design~tion:
~IE~EAS. [~ Immok~ Enl~/e Z~e D~o~nt
~ n ~b~c ~y ~p~inl~ and d~l~l on the ~on~ orcmmt~
~IER~S, I~ EZDA ~hnll ~mtm~ I~ ~ oF ~mlc op~mhy
n~ j~ ct~llon, ntslninnble ~ty d~t, co~mnhy-~
NO~V. TIIEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED IIY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COU~Y. FI.ORII)A.
SE~ION ONE: ~t~ion.of.l~In~knl~E,~a ~
cslnldish nmi cffnlc Ihe Imnm~nl~ Epl~ffi~ Zc~ IN~I
No. ,/~]
APR - 1
csttitlca:
2) A Fina~i~l or fn~ra~
4) x r~idcnt li~nI in t~ ~mlnnt~ ~nt~s~
S) I ~npmfit com~Mty-bas~ ~ti~ ~ati~ ~thln I~ ~miMt~
;nl~fise ~o~
~ a I~t code ~o~,t age~. a~
8) a Io~t law ~Fo~t
O. ~e im~,a~e ormi~fity ~tation ~ the ~8~ sh~fl ~ consid~
makin8 appointments so that the ~ 6~e~ity ~fl~ll t~ ethnic ,~
~m~sition o~the Im~kal~ come,ry.
C. Members o~the AG~~ sh~11 ~ np~Tnt~ ~ n~ ~ at the pte,~f~ o(the
Ooa~ o;County Commission,s.
~e initial te~ oro;ce of the AB~W shall be is
A) T~ (2) mem~rs I~11 be ,p~int~ For n term of thr~ (3) ~arl.
B) T~ (2) m~be~ sh~ll ~ ap~int~ rot n t~ or t~ (2)
D) ~e ~m~inln6 initial m~s ,hall ~ sp~int~ For, I~ of Fmtr (4)
A) Any n~tl~r ~r i1~ AG~ n~y ~ ~ W~ ~lfi~ ~.
n~c~ only .tier ~ Im~ing nmi ~dy irllm ~d~ I~q~ I~ g~, ~. ~rtl~
I~St lO (l~ prior In tim I~fl~l~ I~ ~qS ~fl ~tmh~ h) I~ ~rd in ~
APR - I 1997
,o.
NON 15:34 FAX I 813 642 7830
BARNE'~' BANK
~)OOl
ea. comm.
P.O. BOX 1%5 ~MJK:O ISLAHD, FLOI~IIIA 3~,9~g
March 19 )? RECEIVED
COLLIER COUNTY CO~MIS~E'tS
HAR 2 1997
Oe~r sirs, Bo~ Ct~k~~sssfoners
d Lions :lub wou~ l~ke to spenser a z
~he Marco Isls.n Lons Olub to help
~ es le who are xn nee~ of &X~,u,. y- ~ .... _ ~
We are a completely not for profit
level of hs~pLr~ people.
o have th~ b-eakfas~ Apr~l~,l~Vat Marco Io~d To~
We would like ~ . - ..... . ..... ~.~[~ eerenon~el
Centers a~ the locatLon were ~Ao ufl~zn~m~u --e ....
as off now ~he o~er8 of To~ Cen~er, American
held. Kow~ver - las and date may
have no~ gxve~ u~ pe~tss~on, ~o the ~-[~...a~e o~tlide
~e will be usX~ oar mcbile couk tra~-~- ~
Collier county has a 7~,.00 dollar pe~lt fee for this ~yPe of outdoor
func~ion.
The ~rco Island L~ons club wo~ld like for you to ~ve this fee
aa we are a co.unity ~,erv~ce organization.
Thanks for your cons[d(,rat[on.
Howard E. Rice
1283 Treasure
~arco Za. FL.
Telephune 941389290~
Very sincerely yours,
'Howard E. Rice
Secretary
APR -
Pg. / __
EXECUTIVE
RECOE%4ENDATION TO APPROVE OFFSITE HAULING OF EXCESS MATERIAL
UNDER EXCAVATION PERMIT NO. 59. 597, ~I~J~LES DODGE" LOCATED IN
SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANG~ 25 EAST:
BOUNDED ON THE NORTH AND WEST BY LOTS ZONED I/IND. (PINE RIDGE
INDUSTRIAL PARK), ON THE SOUTH BY PUD (PINE AIR LAKES) AND ON THE
EAST BY AXRPORT-PULLING ROAD.
OBJECTIVE:
To modify an excavation permit from Private to Commercial for the
project known as ~Naples Dodge" in accordance with County
Ordinance No. 92-73, Division 3.5.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The Petitioner proposes to remove 13,000 cubic yards of surplus
fill from the project site to nearby parcels (Home Depot and a
church).
Because of subsurface conditions, the east half of the lake was
over-excavated by approximately two (2) feet and the west half
was under-excavated by approximately four (4) feet. The average
is an under-excavation of about one (1) foot. The west half is
excavated down to limerock, so aquatic vegetation should not root
and grow. The east half has sufficient depth.
The excess fill cannot be used on site without raising the site
so much as to be detrimental to neighboring parcels. The lake
area is required for water retention because of the large
impervious area, and our minimum depth requirements pre-
determined how much fill is generated.
At present there is a stockpile on site containing approximately
13,000 cubic yards of material. Development Services has no
objection to the .fill removal.
FXSCAL IMPACT:
Commercial Excavation Fee ......................................................... $ 850.00
Road Impact Fee ....................................................................................... $ 588.00
Total .............................................................................................................. ~
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
None
-1-
APR 0 1 1997
i~CCt%4ENDATION~
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the change of
Excavation Permit No. 59.597 from private to Commercial for the
project known as ~Naples Dodge" with the following stipulations:
1. The owner must comply with C.C.D.O.T. Standard Conditions for
off-site removal (attached).
PREP~M~ED..BY:
Stan ChrzanowsKx,
Senior En¥ineer
DATE
~BO~4AS E. KUCK, P.E.
ENGINEERING REVIEW SERVICES
MANAGER
DONALD w.-ARNO , AICP
PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
DATE
DATE I /
~INCElqT ERVICES ADMINISTRATOR
c~ITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL S
-2-
._~_~O~u:~o co,mjTso.a'j '~'
£xchv~?xo~ p~n~I~ ~pe6sc~so~s s~vobvi~¢
orr-s~£ ~s~ovxb o£'~t~£~IhU
The intent of these "Standard Conditions" are to provide excavation
pro~ec%s and ~hich should be taken into consideration during all
stages of project development:
Haul routes betveen an excavation site and an arterial road
shall be private vith property owner(s) approval or be a publ£c
collector road built to standards applicable to handle the
resulting truck traf[ic. Where residential areas front
collector roads, appropriate turn lanes, buffer and bikepath
shall be required as minimal site improvements and if
recommended for approval, shall be so uith the condition that
the Transportation Services Administration reserves the right
to suspend or prohibit off-site removal of excavated material
should such removal create a hazardous road condition or
substantially deteriorate a road condit~on~ such action by t~
?ransporca:ion services Administration shall be subject to
appeal before the Board of County Commissioners.
Maul routes utilizing public roads shall be subject to road
maintenance and road repair or an appropriate fair share by the
permittee in accordance uith Excavation Ordinance No. 92-73 and
Righ~-of-~.;ay Ordinance No. S2-91.
3. Off-sire removal of excavated material shall be subject to
Ordinance ::o. 92-22 (Road impact Ordinance). A traffic and
road impac% analysis shall be made by the County to determine
=he effects that off-site removal of excavated material ~ill
have on the road system ~ithin the excavation project's zone of
influence. If appropriate, road impact fees in accordance ~ith
Ordinance pro. 92-22 shall be paid prior to the issuance of an
e>:cavaticn permit.
The Transportation Services Administration reserves the ri~h~
:o establish emergency ~ei~ht limits on public roadways
affected by the off-site removal of excavated material; the
procedure for establishment of ~eight limits shall be the
presentation of an applicable resolution before the Board of
County Commissioners. Should ueig~t limits be instituted, the
permittee shall be responsible to implement measure to assure
~ha% al! heavy truck loadings leaving the permit's property
ccnform %o the applicable ~eight restriction.
The Excavation Performance Guarantee shall apply to excavation
operations and also the maintenance/repair of public roads in
accordance ~ith current ordinances and applicable permit
stipule:ions.
EXHZBZ?
Page One of
0 1697
Uased on soL~ ~o~kng ~n[o~ma~[on po~ O~d~nanco ,~. 92-~)0
~ast~n~ p=rni~ may be approprLate. Shoutd a blas~in~
~ppt[ca%[on be submit[ed and should residential areas
~{[h[r, one mite of the excava[[on site0 the county reserves the
perm[[ bt considered and approved, %he minimum conditions
approve! in add[mien [o cond[[[ons per Ordinance Ho. 92-?3 are
as
~ A. S[ruc[ure inven[ory/moni~orin9 and applicable proper~y
owner release as required by ~he Oevelopmen~ Services
Director.
O. Security bond applicable to pr[va~e p~oper[y
acceptable ~o the County.
C. Con~rol o~ s[ze/dep~h/nu=ber o~ char~es pe~ blase by
~ha Oevelopme~c Services
O. ?~e ri~c o~ ~he Co=ney ~o suspend, and/or
blas=in~ per~i~ au=horley should be de~ermined [ha=
b~as=inc ac~[v[ties a · crea~in~ unacceptable
and/or reda=ed physical effects o~ blasting
.e~eas~ frcn -h. Transportation Services
a~gl~=able =~ ~rcg~r n~=!ga~£on of off-site 'inpac~$.
~ Ordinance No 82-91,
mee=ir,~ cf a~ii.=ab!e prc'.'isicns c~ ·
ordinan=a !;=. $~-22, and Ordinance No. S2-73.
Page 'I',;o Of T~'o
APR 0 1
M~T-~.tJN~ IKMD C~-31
1997
I
I
APr 0 ! t997
FILE No.483 03,,17 '97 13:40 ID:~ T~C~l$1~'(l~l~l'i(l]hl FI:~X:I 941 774 53'75 ~ 2
APR 0 1 1997
10-17-97 14:4l P.~:CEIV~-D FROH:~ 941 774 5~75 '
~:XECUTIVE SUMMARY
LIEN RESOLUTION - CODE ENFORCEMENT CASE NO. 60606-049
RECORD OWNER - BEULAH MAE COLEMAN
Board to accept report and adopt Resolution assessing a lien
against the parcel in order to recover public funds expended
to effect the repair or demolition of a dangerous or
hazardous building, all as provided for in Ordinance 76-70,
the Collier County Dangerous or Hazardous Building
Ordinance.
CONSIDERATION
Case Summary:
a. Violation determination
b. Notice of Violation served
c. Verification of unabated nuisance
d. Nuisance abated with public funds
e. Owner invoiced for costs
undeliverable
12/04/96
01/27/97
01/31/9v
FISCAL IMPACT
Reimbursement of $1,200.00 may be anticipated by voluntary
action or foreclosure.
OROWTH MANAOEMENT IMPACT Not applicable.
RECOMI4ENDATION
That the Board of County Commissioners adopt the Resolution.
PREPARED BY ~
Virg~a Pack
BENIO~ CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE
APPROVED BY I
Vincent A. Cautero, Adm/nistrator
Community Dev. & Envirorunental Svcs.
DATE: ~-~'Z'//-' /~. /9 ~ Z
DATE:
A~)I:ND~ {TIM
No._
APR 0.1. 1997
e
BOA.~D OF COUT~TY COI4HXSSXOHI:RS
COLLXER COU1~TY, FLORXDA
LEGAL NOTXCE OF ASSESSH~I~T OF LXEN
% Bezthell& W£Xmon
Xmmok&Xee, FI, 33934
P3TEI~EHCZ ~0506-04g
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
DATE:
125(30.0000.
LIEI; NUMBER:
LOT Thirteen (X3) in ILOCR Eight (I) of tho CARSO~ ADDXTXON Xn
2mmokelie, Florid&; I subdivision duly recorded Ln tho O£fLoo of the
Clerk of the Cirouit Court, in ind for Collier County,
You, as the owner of the property above described, as recorded in the
records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby
advised that the Compliance Services Manaqer, did on 12~Il~laD order that
the hazardous or dangerous condition which existed on the above property
pursuant to Ordinance ~6-?0 be remedied serving notice thereof upon yOu,
such hazards being:
1. Exterior w&~le ate
2. ~nter~or w&~le are co~laps£ng.
3. CeL~ng ~olltl &ri rot~id.
4. Roof z&£tirl and undirl&~neflt are rotted due to yiarl of leap&go &nd
neglect causing the roof to collapse Ln spots.
S. Floors are rotted out.
6. Tin roof~ng Lo not secured properly end Lo coming off.
?. N~ndows ere broken and sash La rotted.
You failed to abate such nuisance; whereupon, It was abated by the
expenditure of public fonds at a direct cost of S1,000.00 and
administrative cost of $200.00 for a tote! o~ $1,200.00. Such costs, by
Resolution of the Board of County Co~lssioners of Collier County,
Florida, have been assessed aqainst the above property on
and shall become a l~en on the property thirty (30) days after such
assessment.
You may request a heating before the Board of County Commissioners to
show cause, .ii any, why the expenses and cha£~es lncu££ed by the County
under th~$ Ordinance are unwarranted o~ excessive or why such expens~
should not constitute a lien a~ainst the property. Such request
hearing must be ~ade to the C%erk of the Board of County Comm~selon ~s.
Government Center, Nap%es, £%o~da ~q%]2 in writing within thirty ~0)
days f[o~ the date of this assessment to be valid.
CLERK, BOARD O£ COU[J?Y CO~%SS%ON£AS
AGENDA ITEM
No,
APR 0 1 1997
RESOLUTION NO. 97-.
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COPe4ISSIONERS
PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
THE REPAIR OR DEMOLITION OF A DANGEROUS OR HAZARDOUS BUILDIN12,
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 76°70.
WHEREAS. as provided in Ordinance ?6-70, the direct comte of
repair or demolition of a dangerous or hazardous building incurred by
the County. shall be assessed against such property~ and
WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County aa to each p&rcel shall be
calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together
with a description of sa~d parcel~ and
WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding
obligation upon the property against which made until paidl and
WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable thirty (30)
days after the mailing of Notice of Assessment after which interest
shall accrue at a rate of six percent (6.%) per annum on any unpaid
portion thereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. that the property described
as follows, and having been abated of a public nuisance after due and
proper notice thereof to the owner of said property, is hereby assessed
the following costs of such abatement, to wit:
NAME~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION~ COST
Beulah Mas Coleman
% Berthslis Wilson
217 2nd St
Zmmokalee, FL 33934
REFERENCE~
60606-049 #25630800008
LOT Thirteen (13) in BLOCK EIGHT $1,200.00
(e) of the CARSON ADDITION in
Immoksles, Florida/ a subdivision
duly recorded in the Office of the
Clerk of the Circuit Court, in and
for Collier County, Florida.
The Clerk of the Board shall mail a notice of assessment of lien
to the owner or owners of the above described property, and if such
owner fails to pay such assessment within thirty (30) days hereof, a
certified copy of this Resolution shall be recorded in the official
records of Collier County, to constitute a lien against such property
according to law, unless such direction is stayed by this Board upon
appeal of the assessment of the owner.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
DATED:
ATTEST~
DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
CSce 11 - 1/97
BY:
TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN
AGENDA ITEM ~
APR 0 ! 1997'
B~Y BBHD"
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPROVB FOR RE~ORDING THB FINAL PLAT OF "PELICAN
To approve for recording the final plat of "Pelican Bay Bend", a
subdivision of lands located in Section 4, Township 49 South, Range
25 East, Collier County, Florida.
~ONSXDL~ATXONI
Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the final plat
of "Pelican Bay Bend". This document is in compliance with the
County Land Development Code and Florida State Statute No. 177. All
fees have been paid. There are no subdivision related improvements
associated with this plat.
Engineering Review Section recommends that the final plat of "Pelican
Bay Bend" be approved for recording.
oFISC~L IMPACTZ
The fiscal impact to the County is none.
The County will realize revenues as follows:
Fund: 113
Agency: County Manager
Cost Center: 138900 - Development Services
Revenue generated by this project:
Total: $450.00 Plat Review Fees
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACTI
The Concurrency Waiver and Release relating to conditional approval
has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office for
the project.
RBCOMM~ND~TIONI
Thrt the Board of County Commissioners approve the Final Plat of
"Pelican Bay Bend" with the following stipulations:
1. Authorize the recording of the Final Plat of "Pelic,
Bend."
APR 0 1 1997'
Pr_/
Executive Summary
Pelican Bay Bend
Page 2
PREPARED BY:
Joh~ R. Houldsw~rtfi~, Senior Engineer
Engineering Review
Date
REVIEWED BY=
Thomas E. Kuck, P'.E.
Engineering Review Mana~r
~ona
Planning Servicea Director
~VinCent ~. C~u~ero, Admi~is=ra~or
Co,unity Dev. an~ Environmental Svcs.
Co,unity Dev. and Environmental Svcs. DIVISION
Jl~H=ew
Community Dev. and Environmental Svcs. DIVISION
Date
Date --
Date
APR 0 1 1997
?C
-4
-4
,TH
NA 'LES
~S
-4
,4
q4
APR
EXECO~ZVB SUKNARY
RB(20MI4uHDATZOM TO GRANT
To grant final acceptance of "Tin~er Ridge Unit Two"
t~N~ZD~ATZON t
o
On January 16, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners granted
preliminary acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and
sewer improvements in "Timber Ridge Unit Two".
The roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements not
required by the plat to be maintained by the project's
homeowners association will be maintained by the County.
The required improvements have been constructed in accordance
with the Land Development Code. The County Development
Services has inspected the improvements and is recommending
final acceptance of the improvements.
A resolution for final acceptance has been prepared and
approved by the County Attorney's Office. A copy of the
document is attached.
FZB~AL IMPACT ~
The roadway, drainage water and sewer improvements not require~ to
be maintained by the project's homeowners association will be
maintained by the County Transportation Department and the County
Utility Divisions. Funds for the routine maintenance and upkeep
will come from the Operations and Maintenance budgets of the
Transportation Services end Utility Divisions.
~,~.~h"AGENENT IMPACTz None
APR 0 1 J97
Executive Summary
Tlw~er Ridge Unit Two
Page Two
~COMMEND~TZONI
That the Board of County Commissioners grant final acceptance of
the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improve~tentu in "Timber
Ridge Unit Two" and release the maintenance security.
1. Authorize the Chairman to exscute the attached resolution
authorizing final acceptance.
2. Authorize the release of the maintenance security.
PR~ARED BY:
~Ohn R. Ho~l~orth, Senxor Engineer Da~e
Engineering Review
Thomas E. ' ' ' " '
Donald W. Arnold
Planning Services Di~ctor
Vincent ~. Cautero, Admin~-strator
Community Dev. and Environmental Svcs.
Community Dev. and Environmental Svcs. DIVISION
Date
Date
Date
-%
APR O 1 1997
Executive Summary
Temple Shalom
Page Two
_~O0~A~ENDATXON: That the Board of County Commissioners,
Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer
District, accept the water facilities for Temple Shalom, with the
following stipulations:
1) That the Board of County Commissioners accept as surety the
receipt for the cash bond in the amount of $439.50.
2) The water facilities to serve the project cannot be placed
into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until
the following items have been furnished.
3) Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a
letter authorizing the placement of the sewer system into service
and approving the water distribution system for service.
Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements.
5) The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been satisfiad,
and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire hydrant
for ownership and maintenance.
6) Receipt of payment
bacteriological testing
of water usage from Utilities for
Shirley _N~(, En~ineering Technician
Engineer,'rig Review Services
II
Date
REVLE'WED ~Y:
~:~ Thomas E. K~k, P.E.
Engine__~ng~Revie~ Ser~ce, s-Manager
Dona-l-d~W. ~Lrnold, AICP -
Dep ~t Director
VIflcen~A. Cautero, Administrator
CO~I~NITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Date
ba~e
Date
APR 0 1
:- ~~
I n~ATI~3KI M AP ~
Official Receipt- Collier County Board of County Commissioners
CDPR1103 - Official R~celpt
[ 3/4/~7 10:24:01 AM I Post Date
3/4/~7 I MS 7980
TEMPLE SHALOM, INC,
PINE RIDGE ROAD
Official Receipt - Collier County Board of County Commissioners
CDPR1103 - Official Receipt
5403 3/4/97 10:24:01 AM [ 3/4/97 ~ MS 7988
TEMPLE SHALOM, INC,
PINE RIDGE ROAD
Payor: AM SOUTH
Fee Information
IFee Code I Description I GL Account
12BOND DEPOSlTS-COMM DEr (CASH BOND} 67000000022011300000
Tot~"
~nt i Waived
$439.501
$439.50
Payments
IPaTment Code I Account/Check Number Amount
CHECK } 338846150 $439.50
Memo:
Total Cash I $0.00 1
Total Non-Cash I $439.50',
Total Paid I $439.50 i
Cashier/location: GARRETT_8 I 1
User: NIX_S
Collier County Board of County Commlssloner~
CD-P/ua for Window~ gS/NT
0
c:
if.
I~T~I~ FACXLXTXES ACC~PTJd~C~
IT. O20~X~ O~, PI~J~E Il
~ The Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio the
Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, to
accept the newly-constructed water facilities to serve Si:. George
O~e, Phase II and authorize the recordation of the appropriate
leqal documents.
1) The Developer of St. George One, Phase II, has constructed
the water facilities within dedicated easements to serve this
development. See attached location map.
2) Deed, Bill of Sale and other related documents have been
submitted to Engineering Review Services in order for th~) County
to accept the water facilities in accordance with County Ordir~ance
78-10.
3) The water facilities will be, upon acceptance by the Boa, rd,
operated and maintained by the County Utilities Division unde~r a
one (1) year maintenance guarantee furnished by the developer.
4) An on-site inspection of the water facilities has been
conducted by the County Engineering Inspection section. This
inspection reveals that the water facilities have been constructed
in accordance with County Ordinances and Regulations.
5) The legal documents have been reviewed by the County Attorney
and are legally sufficient for acceptance by the Board.
6) An Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. S541647 in the
amount of $53,181.20 has been accepted as surety.
FISCAL IMPACT: The water facilities were constructed without cost
to the Collier County Water-Sewer District. During the first
year, the water facilities are under a Contractual Guarantee.
After that time, the cost of operating and maintaining the water
facilities will be paid by monthly user revenues.
(~ MAN~MENT IMPACT: This project has been connected to the
toun~ Regional Water Treatment Plant. This project will not
create a new impact, as it has been planned for within facilities
available at present.
APR 0 1 1997
,,.1_
Executive Summary
St, George One, Phase
Page Two
RE~NDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners,
~x~offi'cio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer
District, accept the water facilities for St. George One, Phase
II, with the following stipulations:
1) That the Board of County Commissioners accept as surety the
Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. S541647 in the amount of
$53,181.20.
2) The water facilities to serve the project cannot be placed
into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until
the following items have been furnished.
3) Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a
letter authorizing the placement of the sewer system into service
and approving the water distribution system for service.
Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements.
5) The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been satisfied,
and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire hydrant
for ownership and maintenance.
6) Receipt of payment of water usage
bacteriological testing
from Utilities for
PI~PARKD BY:
Shirley Nt~W'~Engin~ering Technician II
Engtneerin~ Review Services
Date
REVIEWED BY: ..-
Thomas'R: ~K~ck, P.E.
Donald W. Arnold, AICP
VfnCent~A. ~autero, Adm. inistra~or
CG~WUNITY DEVELOPMENT /:~TD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Date
Date
APR 0 1 1997
NATIONAL
I,F:I"rER OP CR£DIT
tI {<NT t.F., F.N ·
~f'. {t,l~RP.t'V OF'Y2t{ OUR ~RREV'..ICAUI.,I~: ~'rAhIDI')Y I.KTTL'.R Ol-' t:Rl~lll'l' :'FI YOllll
,.,.¢,1{{1,~O UNI'I'£n 5?A?~:t; L,IiI.L.AI4~
HUNDJ~ED I~I'CHT¥ O.I, IF.: 20/100 ) AV^tL. AUi. I':
FO L{.(Jvf.~, ,
"AI..~N Il^V I IN Lli.:VI-:I.OPHENT t'~,rPOl,'A'rION I~^t: I.'AII.I':D fi't: i:ON?.'I'RUC'{' ANTI/
~{~' HATj'I'yAZN ']'H~.' ZHJ~{~OVP..Ht''I'{'{':.'' A::.~O(:TA'I';.:I] Vl'rl.I 'T'IIAT lq.}'.N'['AIH I){.hT
III:'!'I'iC'I'I'.'F; ;iA1'! ~I"Af."J'UI~Y T'..~ ,."?t.l.t {:'lC ,,~,tll. l'rY iIA;Z tlqS'l' III~'ICFI pl.'.lll;Ol/Hl.:fl
f,~l,~[~ To 'TH~ hA,rt, or ~:k,p,~{v. ANI!
HI.:I~FURMANI:I': .~k:~:ITPTTY It'A?, NOr FIP~N PROVI [Jt:O 'l'O ANP. I,'¢.}I,~MAL. I.Y
J',i.f. uArdK!Nf: ('fl~h'l:l~::: O'l'IJl.'l~ 'I'FIAH ClJh','3,
A t: t:u i/N'I'.
f.E:'£TF.P. O1' CREDIT NUl'linEX .~;~,;.f. 47 DA'£F.D NARCH :{9, 1999."
IIt:l.:MEU AUTOflATIt:ALI. Y I.;X'I'I'-'NUI':U ~,/L'J'fIUU'I' AHk;J'tL)NI':I'I']' I"t}l,~ (}Jql': YI':AIC
~'ROI~. THI" },RI~.I.]KN'F OR ANY FIJTt$):F.
L (:,O) RAYF. PRIOR '£O CUCH I,;XP1'RATxON DA',I'E. ~F. NOTTI-'Y YOU TN
't:¢)ll~Tt:l{ THAT WE F:LI.:CT NOT '1'() I~ENF.~' 'rH3'.~ I',£T'FFR OF' t:~F:.DIT POfl ANY
W'£ l-tP..~l.:llY A~,,Rb:~. 'dTTll YilII THAT
I:/NI, II,I. JANf'{.: ~dT'rl4 '~'{4~. 'r }: /,' H .~: AND t'ONi3T??ON~ INF'. 'rl]l~.: ,:flELNTq' .lrAI.t. 1.~£
l:liN'rltdf:Kl! {{N FI~'{' I~AI:P WHIr:ti I~OI4HI| AN IN';'I,:(;t;AI. I,AI,'T Ol.' TFIJ
'APR 0 1 1997 ,
i
~ARCH l'J. lg~17
OR Al*fY AtI?ONA't~iCAi, I.~ ~X?I':N'rI~D C)ATg A~ PROVYDgD FOI{ H~RE, IN.
F.'XC:I.:V'r /{1: ()'~'III';NWIilI.: EXPHI.',HIIf,Y t4'fATr'.{1 III.',R~)'I'I, Tllfd r..ETTEI}
DOt;U,tIENTAR¥%C~ED,fTS, £STARI, I~H~:D BY Tilt-: INTERNATIONAL CH'AMBE~
O!~ CO}l~lgRCg~ ~h- -" ~llq R~'r~CT Oe~ T~£ DATR OF ~S::UAN¢£ 0~' TH~, C~£n~T.
'...
A Ir?IlO I
PI.~&...~ I')IRBCI' A~.]. J'NQUINJi.'?, f¢l",~,Altllfl'tt: 'l'lllt|
?O O(IE XNT'I, SUI~PORT SF:RVJCt: A'/' (3o:.)
...~,
~ .
APR 0 1 1997
~]~TER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE FOR
LALI~E AT THE V~NEYARDS
OBJECTIVe: The Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio the
Governing"'Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, to
accept the newly-constructed water facilities to serve Lalique at
The Vineyard and authorize the recordation of the appropriate
legal documents.
C0~SIDERATIONS:
1) The Developer of Lalique at The Vineyards, has construct,~d
the water facilities within dedicated easements to serve this
development. See attached location map.
2) Deed, Bill of Sale and other related documents have been
submitted to Engineering Review Services in order for the County
to accept the water facilities in accordance with County Ordinance
78-10.
3) The water facilities will be, upon acceptance by the Board,
operated and maintained by the County Utilities Division under a
one (1) year maintenance guarantee furnished by the developer.
4) An on-site inspection of the water facilities has been
conducted by the County Engineering Inspection section. This
inspection reveals that the water facilities have been constructed
in accordance with County Ordinances and Regulations.
5) The legal documents have been reviewed by the County Attorney
and are legally sufficient for acceptance by the Board.
6) Surety for utilities is covered under the Subdivision
Improvement acceptance.
FISC2~ IMPACT: The water facilities were constructed without cost
to the Collier County Water-Sewer District. During the first
year, the water facilities are under a Contractual Guarantee.
After that time, the cost of operating and maintaining the water
facilities will be paid by monthly user revenues.
G~ MA~NT IMPACT: This project has been connected to the
County Regional Water Treatment Plant. This project will not
create a new impact, as it has been planned for within facilities
available at present.
APR 0 1 1997
Executive Summary
Lalique at The Vineyards
Page Two
~E~NDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners,
Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Hater-Sewer
District, accept the water facilities for Lalique at The
Vineyards, with the following stipulations:
1) The water facilities to serve the project cannot be placed
~nto service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued until
the following items have been furnished.
2) Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a
letter authorizing the placement of the sewer system into service
and approving the water distribution system for service.
3) Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements.
4) The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been satisfied,
and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire hydrant
for ownership and maintenance.
5) Receipt of payment of water usage
bacteriological testing
PREPARED BY:
Shl'fl~ey ~/~, ~giheering Technician II
EngineeF4'ng Review Services
from Utilities for
Date
REVI F2~ED 4~Y:
~Th6mas ]~. Kuck, P.E.
E~ring_Revie~ S~ana ge r
~na~. ~nold, AICP
P~g Services D~tment Director
V~ncenf A. Cautero, AdminiStrator
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Date
D~te
Date
attachments
APR 0 1 1997
EXE~ SUMMARY
APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH NAPLES NATIONAL
GOLF CLUB FOR ACCESS IMPRO~~ WITll C.IL 9~! FOUR LANING
IMPROVEMENTS, BID NO. 95-2320.
~ Board approv~ of the attached Aa~mm with Nzp~es National 0~'
Club which provides for the construction of access im:pr~s alo~ C.R. 951 by
Collier County.
CONSIDERATIONS: Naples National Golf Club desires to compensate and have the
County construct certain improvements as part of the curr~t C.R. 951 improvements.
Staff hu nccepted Naples National Golf Club's proposal and has pr~par~ an ~
that ~,ts forth the fonowin8 primary obli~tions:
County shall construct and inspect access improvmnents r~tati~ to Naples Nstkmal
Golf Club on C.R. 951. The scope of work consists of a median left turn lane,
turn lanes, turnout, and drainage work.
All improvements shall be constructed within original public fights-of-way and
additional right-of-way to be donated by Naples National Golf Club. Costs for all the
improvements will be borne by Naples National Golf'Club.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the improvements is seventy thousand, eight
1six dollars and ft~ cents National Golf Club is
(s?0,soss0).
Naples
re~on~'ble
for the total cost. A budget amendment is necessary to recognize and transfer tim revenue
into expense account no. 313-163673-66061 (CR. 951).
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT; None.
I~COMM~NDATION;
I.
2.
3.
4
That the Board of County Commisgon~s:
Approve the attached Agreement with Naples National Golf Club.
Direct the Board Chairman to execute the Agreement.
Accept the revenue fi.om Naples National Gotf Club.
Approve the necessary bu~,~e~amendment.
PREPARED B~. I~ ~X~
· '~ Micah K. Mas~uoi, P.E., PMP, Project Mgr.
REVIEW£D
B¥~
Adolfo A. Gott~2alez, P.£~Diri~or
Offie...t of Capital Prgject~ M~,n~Sement
l~yml~nd W. Miller, P.E.
Interim Public Work~ Administrator
Attachment: Three duplicate original agreements
cc: David Bobanick, Interim Transportation Director (w/attach)
APR 0 ! 1997
THIS Agreement, made and entered into this -- day of
leg?, by amd between the Board cf County ¢oam~lcnere, Co'-~
Coumty, Florida, a political eubdivielom cf the State of Florida,
hereimafter called the COUNTY, and Maples National Oolf Club, ·
Florida corporation, duly orvanized and authorized to comduct business
lm the State of Florida,~ hereinafter called the
~EREAS, the COUNTY, in compliance with and in fulfillment of
COUNTY'S five-year secondary roadway improvement proqra~, ia presently
constructing a portiom of ¢.R. 951 highway designated as
project no. 66061, C.R. 951 four laming improvements U.S. 4X to
a4, hereinafter called
IflTERF.~, thc DEVELOPER, either in commsctiom with or in
fulfillment of aesiqned obligations set forth elsewhere in the public
records of Collier County relative to the DEVELOPZR'e Maples Natiomal
Cell Club le proposing to construct, recomstruct~ or otherwise change
a portion of C.R. 951 and the associated drainage system fromtinq and
adjacent to said Naples ~ational Oolf Club, hereinafter caXled the
'ProJect'~ and
WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER desires to compensate and have the COU~rTY,
on behalf of the DEVELOPER, design, permit and constzmct the Project
concurrently with the COUNTY'S constructiom contract previously
executed for the Highway; a~d
W~EREAS, the COUNTY is agreeable to amd desirous amd capable of
performing, providing, or otherwise undertakinq certain
permitting, conetructiom, and contract administration services for
DEVELOPER in connection with the Project·
NO~, therefore, lm conmideration of the promises and ~utual
covenants hereinafter contained, the COUNTY hereby aqress to perform~
provide, or otherwise undertake certain design, permitting,
construction, and contract administration services in connection with
the Pro, ecS as outlined below, and both the COUNTY and the DEVELOPER
hereby covenamt each to the other to i~plement the Project
concurrently with ~he Hi9hway subject to and lm accordance with the
COUNTY'S construction comtract for said Highway and the te~ms and
provisions aa hereinafter contained.
SECTION I. Descrioticn and Location of Hlohwav and
1.01 The Highway which the COUNTY ie presently constructing
pursuant to the COUNTY'S previously approved five-year secondary
roadway program consists of convertinq C.R. 951, from a [2) lane two
(2} way rural roadway to a four (4) lame divided urban roadway
commemcin~ at Junction U.S.41, and extending northerly to $. R.
1.02 The Project is specifically located opposite amd ad,scent to
land held by DEVELOPER within part of Section 10,Township 50 South,
Range ~6 East, or approximately at C.R. 951, etatiom ~09~ to
The planned scope o! worx for the Project consists of ~wo =e~lan turn
lame accesses, amd associated drainage work ae more particularly
described in the COUNT¥'~ design plams for project no. ~O~l aa
designed by ~ohnson Engineering Zmc. amd which shall be amended by
CO~T¥ for the purposes est forth herein. Xt le understood tha~ said
design plane to be prepared and provided by C0~?¥ are deemed herein
to include appropriate construction drawings, permits, specifications
and ail other contract documents for ~£V£LOP£~'e ProJec~ access
improvements.
Page 1 of 8
APR 0 1 '1997
2,01 Except II thil Agreement nay otherwise b~ ~sr~lnated, this
2.02 ~e ~ or D~PER lay resinate ~ie k~ee~nt with
reasonable cause prior to the c~ple~Aon of the ~oJect, u~n
(30) dams prior written no~lce each to the o~er. In ~e ~en~
such te~ination by either pa~y, the ~ Ihlll ~ entitled
c~nsation for the value o~ se~lces p~vlded,
perfumed, and te~lnatlon costs Is actually ln~r~d.
2.03 ~e ~oJect as pro~sed shall ~ primarily ~ain~ln~
county or its assize v~th reepl~ to ~ay I~d
IXllt within public rights-of-way and/or ~blio or private
~e O~PXa herein agrees to qran~ or ack,re on ~half
~ all addit~onal r~ghts-of-vay and/or eae~nen~e ~r~
~Y ~n order to cease.ct the ~oJec~ a~d there~nafter to
ac~leitiona nay Include ten~ra~ cease.cries elOeeents ~ich ·hall
e~ire and become null upon c~pletion of all work Ipec~fled
ProJec~ design. In the absence of I fo~al grant of I ten~ra~
to cease.ct the Project and for othe~ pu~osee e~essl~ stated
2.04 CO~y reserves the right at its e~penee at · future tine to
restrict movement et enid median openings or modify ·lid access se
part of a future highway Improvement to C.R.
3.01 The DEVELOPER shall assume the entire cost of designing and
constructing the Project. The COUntrY shall provide copies of the
plans and specifications for approval by the DEVELOPER. Noreover, no
later than ninety (90) calendar days after execution of this
Agreement, the COUNTY shall submit a listing of pertinent contract pay
items to the DEVELOPER if so requested by DEVELOPER. This lilting
shall show the contract unit prices applicable to the Project aa
obtained (negotiated) by COUNTY.
3.02 The DEVELOPER shall not be responsible for, nor shall
DEVELOPER dictate, the means, methods, techniques, sequences or
procedures of construction relating to the Project, said
responsibility to be that of the county and/or its cent
Highway and the Project. rector for the
3.03 The DEVELOPER shall not be responsible for the COU~qTY or its
contractors complying with OSHA .Safety and Health Standards (29 CFR
1926/1920) as authorized by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational
Safety, and Health Administration, said responsibility to be that of
the COUNTY and/or Its contractor for the Highway and the Project.
3.04 The DEVELOPER shall not be responsible for obtaining
environmental and operational per~lte for the Project, said
responsibility to be that of the COUNTY and/or its contractor for the
Highway and the Project.
Page 2 of I
3'.05 The DEVELOPER agrees to assign a representative oF agent to
the Project during design end construction of the PToJect es that the
COUNTY say effectively coordinate its services with DEVELOPI3t. Xn
this respect, the DEVELOPER agrees to rlq~lrl itl representative or
agent to attend regular progress meetings aa Bay be requested by the
COUNTY. The DEVELOPER's representative or agent under this
shall be aria Dane, Coastal Engineering Consultants, Xnc.or any other
individual, riru or entity that the DEVELOPER recounende to the COUNTY
and the county henceforth approves, Moreover, the DL~V~LOP£R's
representative or agent under thio Agreeuent, Kris Dane shall nc1:
DEVELOPER's contract authority under this Aqreeuent end any
directions, instructions, or notifications given such representative
or agent by the COUNTY or by the COUNTY'S lUthorized represent&tire or
agent shall be in full force aa if given directly to the DL~LOPER.
The above notwithstanding, the COUNTY shall endeavor to Aesu~
directives, instructions, or notifications relating to the
~ECTZON ZV. COU~TY,S RESPONSiBilitY
4.02 With respect to specific services to be provided to the
"Anticipated Cost of Pro, ecS" [ACP] &nd the "Actual Construction Coat
Statement" [ACCel are deemed to Lnclude but shall ~ot necessarily be
limited to the following itemaz
4.011 Roadway and drainage designs including plan reviews
and coord~nation by COUNTY during conetruction~ and, any resultant
necessary revisions required by COUNTY, by DEVELOPER, or by ut£11ty or
environmental agencies.
4.012 Coordination of the Pro~ect lmprovementm with
environmental permittin~ agencies and other governing authorities
during design and construction of the Project and the Hlqhway.
4.01~ Formulation, preparation and administration time
expended by COUNTY for khia ~qreement.
4.014 Reimbursement of the actual costs of constructing the
Project, including reasonable and ~uatified additional coats if
incurred b~ the COUNTY directly related to delay and time extensions
under the Highway contract caused by or necessitated by the Project
work.
4.015 Construction and contract administration time for the
Pro~ect, expended by the COUNTY on behalf of the DEVELOPER to the
extent that such costs are reimbursable to the COUNTY aa ~ore
particularly specified in 8.03 hereinafter.
4.02 The following specific services will be the obligation of the
COUNTY re~arding construction and contract administration of the
Pro~ect.
4.021 Coordinate COUNTY'S design and construction of the
Project with DEVELOPER and/or DEVELOPER's agent.
A.~22 Conduct daily on-site observations of all work to
review contractor compliance with the Pro~ect plans and
specifications, with periodic written progress reports to the
DEVElOPER's agent or representative ae deemed necessary by the COUNTY
and if so required by DEVELOPER.
4.02~ Coordimate contract related Project activities with
the DEVELOPER's agent or representative.
4.024 Confer with public officials and utllitM o~era in an
effort to coordina~e ~ork stages.
Page 3 of !
4.02S Kaintain contact vith naceesaz'y indivLdu·~· or
· gent In ensuring that the covtrrY'S Highvay contractor is constructing
th· Project ·ccording to coulrrY and DEVELOPER approved plans and
specifications.
4;026 Keep · record or construction proqrnea in ·c~ordance
vith accepted standard practice,
4.027 Conduct periodic field Boa·ur·manta and calculate
quantities rot monthly pay reg~aste and ~oordinat· such measurements
· nd calculations vith th· DKVET, OPER'o ·gent or r~prosentativs.
4.028 Keep a daily record or onosite observations.
4.020 Administrate, in tho fora Of ~l·ns, uenoranc,~·,
changes and th· pric· therefore, the CC)q;~rTY lhill for~hvith
Change Order ·nd/or Supplemental Agreement documents aB appropriate
for DEVELOPER's execution. The above notvithetanding, the
· dditicnelly ·uthorizes th· COUlrTY to pr·pare, execute and ~l~lmnt
liner Change Order· for york changes necessitated by ·ctull field
conditions at the Project site to accommodate the a~proved pl·ns rot
the Project. Said Change etd·ri Rust be issued for v~rk vithin the
physical liuits of the Pro~ect, and in no event shall tho value of any
individual Change Ordlr exceed $1,000.00, nor shall the combination or
·uch Change Order· exceed ten (10) percent of tho estimated total
con~ract amoun~ for ~he Pro~ec~. Additional or extra vork no~ covered
by existing COUNTY construction con~rac~ unl~ price· tot the Project
shall be authorized in vrl~ing through · Supplemental Agreenen~
documen~ ·lamed bM both ~he COUNTY and the DEVELOPER.
4.0210 Reviev and approve ·hop dr·vines for co~tornity v~th
the Project's plans and specl~Acatio~·.
4.02~ Reviev ~he Hlghvay contractor's cl·ims ~or time
extensions and extra compe~eation tot the Highway ·nd/or Project,
any, and advise DEVELOPER accordingly of resultan~ impact to the
Pro~ec~.
4.0212 Correc~ errors, omissions and deficiencies of · minor
nature that appear in the Pro~ect planl and specifications during the
course of construction vith the exception of existing under, round or
above-ground private u~llitiee.
4.0212 Regularly and periodically examine, vith the
or DEVELOPER's representative, requests for payment (monthly pay
estimates~ aa ·ubml~ed to the COUNTY by the COUntrY'S Hlghvay
contractor to determine that they are in order tot pa~ment and
consistent vi~h ~he contract documents entered into between the COUHTY
and the CO~,?Y'S Hig~va¥ contractor for the construction of the
Project. I~en such requests are deemed to be in proper order the
COUNTY shall certify tha~ to the best of its knovledge, the quali~y
and quantity of work performed is' in accordance vl~h the Pro~tic~
and Specifications and shall transmit them for pa~nnent to the COUNTY
Finance Director a· par~ of the monthly pa~nusnt proces·es for the
H/abysM.
4.0214 Obtain required guarantees of contrictorl ind lUb-
contractor·, and velvets and releases of cl·lm of lien from persons
and tarns performing work or providing services on or for the Pro~ect.
4.0215 ~otify the DEVELOP£~ it the COUNTY'S Con,rector'·
performance ia or appears to be behind schedule vl~h regard to the
Project.
4.02~6 Upon completion of all york associa~ed uith the
Pro, act, including all Change Order· and Supplemental Agreements
there~o, make a final inspection of the Pro~ect vith the DEVELOPER's
agent or representative.
e
4.0217 Prepare a final Reuort cf ~neuecticn and Certificate
~ com~letion for eub~ls~on to D~E~PER for Ippr~al a~ fo~
~ans~at~on ~e~lces D~vlsion and other
having Jur~sdl~lon ~er the
4.021s If requested by DEVELOPER, provide ~ with
emended drivings shoving final construction feiturol
made during the courae of the Project. baaed on ~a~lmd-dap
prints, dravlnge end other d&te furnlehed b~ the
contractor to the COU)IT¥. Theae e~ended drevlnqe e~all
ae "record dravings", but ehall not be certified b~ th~
4.0219 The CO~TY viii utilize personnel ~reL~a ~.Im~r~
qualifications and nu~r In ~rfo~l~ l~' ~~1~
hereunder.
4.0220 It la undarltoo4 ami egTeed b~ ~ Fertiee t~lt tbs
function ot the ~ under the te~e of ~11 ~ ~
I~clfic design, ps,String, const~ctlon I~ ~nt~
le~lci. Is enumerated heretofore. If ~e ~'J HI~y
at any time fails or failed to couply vlth i~ ~~ ~
~n such f~llurs(s) ~nd subse~ent ~plisn ~11 ~ ~
responsibility of said contractor, pr~lded bmr, ~t
~U~Y fails or failed to co=ply vith the t~m of ~is ~~,
~Y shall be solely responsible to ~e ~~ ~
f~llur~(s) or non-compliance. If the ~0~ ~t,~or's f~ilm
comply Is ~ result of the D~Z~PZR falling to ~1~ vi~ tk
of this Agreement then the D~E~PER shall ~ re~ible f,
failure or noncompliance.
SE~ION V. INDE~IFICATIOH
~.01 In consideration of ten dollars ($10.00) ~l~
sufficiency of ~hlch Is accepted through the slqnl~ of ~ls ~nt
by an authorized party or agent, the DEVE~PER shell l~lfl
save the COUNTY hapless fro~ any and all clll~s, liability,
and causes of actions arising out of ~ny 8c~, e~r, omission,
negligence of the DEVE~PER or its agents or representatives
fro~ or lnciden~ to the D~PER's perfo~anco u~tr ~ls
as othe~lse provided in section 4.0220.
~ls provision shall also pertain to any cluing bright aqains~ the
~u~y by any employee of the named DEVE~PER, any subcontractor, or
anyone directly or Indirectly employed by any of them.
The D~PER's obligation under this provision shall not be
tn any ray, by the anticipated cost of Project [ACP] as 8ho~ In this
Agreemen~ or ~he DEVE~PER's limit of or lack of sufflclen~ insurance
protection.
SE~ION VI.
6.01 The COUNTY and the D~E~PER shall maintain insurance in the
minimum amounls and types as re~ired by Florida ~v.
6.02 The COUNTY and the D~E~PZR agree that tither party ~ay be
self-insured on the condition that all self insurance(s} ,ust comply
vlth all state la~s. an~ regulations and ~u.~ ~eet vlth the approval of
the other party ~o this Aoreemen~.
7.01 The Collier County Office of Capital Projects ~lrtc~or, tither
directly ~tth ~h~ DZVE~PZR or through duly authorized representatives
assloned to the ProJec~ by him, shall ac~ am the CO~TY'S contract
authority under this Agreement. As the CO~TY'S designee under this
Agreement, the Office of Capl~al Pro~ects Director shall also have the
Page 5 of 8
1997
authority, with the priorv~ltten approval of t~ ~t~:LOl~/t, t~
~ scope of work In ~e ~ ~s ~f~ ~l~, ~ ~
value not to exceed lSt of ~ ~% ~ ~~ bid ~ for
conmt~ctinq ~m ~o~ ~ ~s~ ~ ~t of
1.0l ~e ~ will e~eavor to ~n~ vl~ and
const~ct~on o~ the Highway pursuant to ~ B~d No, 95-2320.
~rk for both ~he ProJec~ and the Highway shall ~eet ~e standa~.~s
s~clfied by the S~a~e of Florida ~part~en~ of Transpo~ak~on and ~he
~ Tr~nspo~ation S~loes Division.
1.02 If repasted by D~PER, the ~ lhall provide
D~PER with a statement outlining the anticipated conmt~ction
of ~e ~o~ect [ACP] vith~n ninety (90) calendar days a~ter exert/on
of thio Agreement by ~he pa~le.. ~e [ACF] shall lu~arize the
esti~ated lump sum and/or unit prices for re,ired ~ork ~nd
const~ction ~aterials aultiplied by the COPY'S estimated ~antities
of 'said work and ~aterials. ~e [ACP] represents ~ha CO~'S bast
projection of the probable cost of const~ctinq the ~Ject based on
~a ~U~Y'S design of the Pro, act.
~.03 The DEVE~PER shall pay unto the CO~ the a~ount
S~Y THOUSAND E~GHT ~DRED SIX ~L~S AND FI~Y CE)~S
($70,806.50) aS the escrow deposi~ [ACP] for const~ction of tho
~oJect by the COUNTY ~ithin fourteen (14) calendar days after the
date of execution of this Agreement.
~.04 The CO~Y shall provide the D~PER, upon co~pletion of the
~oJect by the ~U~Y, with a statement shoving tho actual
const~ctlon cost of the Project (hereinafter referred to as 'Actual
Const~ctlon Cost Statement" [ACCS]) within thirty (~0) calendar days
after the construction provided for in this Agreement Is completed
the COUNTY and accepted by the DE~PER a~ ,pecif~ed heretofore under
Article number 2.01.
~.05 ~e CO~Y shall reimburse the D~P~ for the difference
value between the [ACP] and the [ACCS], if the foyer aBount exceed~
the latter amount. The COU~ shall pay the additional a~ount to the
D~PER within twenty-one (21) calendar days after the date on which
~e const~ction provided for tn this Agreement l~ co~pleted by the
~ and accepted by the D~E~PER a~ ~pec~fied heretofore under
A~icle nu~er 2.01.
8.06 ~e D~PZR shall reimburse the ~ for the difference
value between the [ACP] and the [ACCS], If the latter a.ount exceeds
the foyer a~ount. ~e D~PER shall pay the additional a~ount
the ~ within twenty-one (21) calendar day~ after the date
~lch the const~ction pr~lded for In this Agree. est i~ c~pleted
the ~ and ~ccepted by the D~PZR as ~pecified heretofore under
A~icle numar 2.01.
SE~IOH IX.
9.01 ~is ~gree~en~ shall ~ qove~ed by ~he law of ~he S~a~e'
Flori~. venue of any a~to. for breech or ~o enforce or cons~e
~is AgreeBent shall ~ in the Clr~i~ Cou~ o~ CollAe~ Coun~,
Florida.
~.02 Bo~h Coun~y and ~veloper acknowledge ~ha~ ~his A~raemen~ was
achieved ~hrough ~u~ual and free nego~/a~ion. Therefore, any doubtful
or i~i~oul provisions con.lined in ~h/s Aqreemen~ shall no~ be
cons~ed more a~ric~ly igains~ el~hlr ~he County or ~veloper,
~ga~less of which par~y p~ys/cally prepared ~hia Agreement.
Page 6 of 8
9.03' Xt ia understood thet this Agree~ont ~ust b~ sxecutod by both
potties prior to the D~veloper and the County oom. encing vith the vor~
end services deeorll~d h~r~ofor~.
~ies a~ any ~ificatio. a to this ~ent shall ~ reduced
~ltinq and aiqned by the pa~iea hereto.
g.OS ~is Aqree~ent is 'asli~able only u~n ~e ~itten consent, of
the pa~Aes, which consent shall no~ '~ unreasonably wi~ald, and
oub~ec~ to 'ouch consent, shall be binding upon and inure to ~e
~nerAt or.assi~or,s successors and assigns.
~ ~SS ~OF, the p~ieo hereto have oauood ~la ~en~
~ exo~ed ~'~eir appropriate orr~ciuxs, as or ~e da~e rA~ ~e
ox/os/gA
Page 7 ot 8
At"N 0 1997 I
COM,ZER COUlrry~ I'LOR:XDA
BTAT~ OF FLORIDA
COUNTY 0F COLLIER
MAPLF. S HATZOHAT. GOLP ~LUB
**
BYZ
(SEAL)
Before Be. the undersigned authority, thio day Personally
&ppesred CHARLES V. BENTON tO Be well kno~fll end knovn to me to be
President of the Corporation naiad in the foregoing Agreelent, &hd he
ecknovledged to end before Be that he executed enid Agreslent on
behalf of and in the aloe of laid Corporation! that he is duly
authorized by said Corporation to execute said Agresuant and that said
Agresuant ia the free asa and deed of ea!d Corporation.
official seal this 6T~
Approved me to fo~ and lagal
sufficiency:
David Waigel
County Attorr;ey
PAG:6208
X have hereto met my hand &nd affixed
day Of'JANUARY _, A.D. 1997.
Stats sad County aforesaid,
Ny Commission Expires:
.Page 8 of 8
11/19/9&
LA.PR ¥/
RECO~A~ON TO APPROVE THE ACQUISmON OF THE MELI
PROPERTY TO ~ SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANA~ DIS'I~CT
PERMIT MITIGATION REQ~$ I:K)R ~ NAPLES LANDFIll,.
CONSIDERATION: The South Florida Water Management District (SFWIVID) perm/t
for the N~les Landfill required mitigation for the construction of Cell Six w~dch was ~
in three phases over the period 19~6 throush 1993. One of the permit special corHitions
required the County to purchase an 83 sc're parcel of land off-site from the land~ll. On
May 24, 1994, an Itsreement was brou~t to the Board to facilitate the acquisition of that
property. The County's share in tlutt acquisition wis $360,000.
Negotiations on the 83 ~cre parcel were not succesdul. An aJternite puc, el of f~.3 acres
accei~ble to SFWMD was identified. Due to the reduced acreage, ~ditional
enlmncemen~re3toration in the arnount of $22,371.72 was also requh'ed. A purchase price
of $200,000 for the property has been negotiated with the owner.
The Option Agreement provides that Collier County will have the option to purchase the
Meli site, at an amount not to exceed $200,000 for a period of 90 days after the execution
by the Board of County Commissioners. If the County decides to exercise its option to
purchase the site, a written notice must be forwarded to John and Edith Meli, and the
Board of County Commissioners must execute the A&~'eement For Sale and Purchase
(Exhibit "B" of the Option Agreement). A closing sh~ occur within ninety (90) days
after the execution by the Board of the Agreement of Sale and Purchase.
Pursuant to the Option Aip'eement, the County will have ninety (90) days to inspect the
property for pollution or cont~vtination, complete an app~sal report in accordance with
Florida Statute 125.355 (!) (b) and to meet all applicable statutory r~luirements.
FISCAL IMPACT: A total land cost for the Meli site is $200,000. Other costs will
include: costs for a title policy Sl,075, environmental site assessment and review S9,$00,
$.'?,2,372 for enhancement/restoration, recording costs $11, appraisal cost of approximately
S5,000, for in estimated cost of $237,958. Budget is available in Solid Waste
Fund (&70=173/4 1&-649 110-59508).
GROWTH MANAGKMKNT IMPAC~: N/A
Dsvid W. ~ Director, Sdid Wute
Maaasement Department
])ate
JLtymond/W. Miller, P. F.. Interim Administrato
Publk Works DJvbJon
Date
PUBLIC WORKS DMSION
DWR:ad
I~AL T_STATE PL"RCHASE OPTION AGRI~EMENT
Ti.HS AGR.EEIVt~,Tr made and mterod into this _~,.~ day of r~'"'~/~ .., 1997 by and between
John J. Melt and Edith C. Moji, husband and wife, (bereinafler referred to as the 'C~'ner'), and
COLLIER COU'N'TY, a Political Subdi~'ision or the State of FloricL~ ~ereinafler referred to as the
"Purchaser");
WITNESSETH, that for the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) a~t other good smd valuable
considerations ptid lo the owner by the Purchaser, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and
the mutual promises and covenants her~qn~er set forth, Owner hereby L. rants to Purchaser an
exclusive option and right to purchase the property more pm'ticul~rly described as:
That portk~ of the North-haft (N1/2), lying Noe~ of U.S. 41 ('Tan'~ami Trail),
Sect~ 11, Townsh~ $1 8ou~, Range 2~, E~st
{'bereinaftet referred ~o a.s 'Troperty'), made a part of this Real Estate Purchase Option Agreement,
(hereinsfter retrewed to as "Option Alp'cc'meat'), for a period ol' nines)' (90) days, (hereiraRer referred
to ,,, "Option Period'), from and after execution by this Real Estate Pun:ha.se Option Agreement by the
Purchaser, subject to the terms and conditions hereafter stated.
Owner acknowledges and agrees that Purchaser, prior lo exercising its option, musl obtain acctptable
financing, tmdenake reasonable investigat:on o1' thc property and meet all applicable statutory
requirements.
Owner agrees em during the Option Period ',he Property will not be leased, sold or encumtx-red to any
other paz~.
T~e Property, as defined in this Option Agreement, shall include all minerals contained in the property,
all non-public water rights peru.thing to the property and nil improvements thereon.
If Purchaser exercises its rights in accordance with this Option Agreement, then thereafter, the
Agreement of Sale and Purchase, referenced as Exhibit "B", a~ached hereto ~d made a part hereof,
(hereinaRer rel'e'rred to as the "Contract"}, shall be executed by both parties within thirty (30) days of
such v,'ntten notice by Purchaser and shall go~'¢m the relationship ol'the p~rties in all respects.
Purchaser's exercise o1' its rights pursuant to this Option Agreement shall be e¥idcnccd by the
Purchaser Six'ins ~¥nnen notice to Ihe C)~'ner b.~ certified mail, return receipt requested, to the O~¥ner
at the follov, ing address:
John and Edith
P. O. Box ~
Naples, Florida 34106
If at the expiration of the Option Period, Purchaser has failed to provide to the Owner appropriate
notice of exercise of option in the manner prescribed, this Option Agreement shall become null and
void and of no further effect and neither pz~.' shall hax. e any further rights or claims against thc other.
This Option Agreement shall be binding upon the p~-'lies hereto and their respecti','e heirs,
administrators, successors, successor trustees, and assigns.
APR 0 1997
IN W]TNESS WHEREOF. tht panie~ hereto l~ve caused these pr~tnu mo be execmcd in thei~
AS TO PURCHAS£R:
DATED:..
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clgrk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMI',GSSIO~
COLLIER ¢OUt~'rY, FLORIDA
. lX'puq, Clerk
By:
Timothy L. Hmmck. C2~.irn~a
AS TO OWNER:
DATED:
WITNESSESS:
rim Wime~$ignatum)
Fire. Witn~ CPrint N~ne)
Second Wime~s (Signature)
Second Wimess (Print Name)
Edith C. Meli
Approved as lo form and
legal su~ciency:
~teidi F.-Ashton
Assistant County Anorney
APR 0 1997
4
,'0
AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE
THIS AGREEMENT t~ made ~ entered In~ by
w~·, (hemk'~fter mf·n~d ~ N
WITNE$$ETH
WHEREAS. ~.e~r i~ Ihe ovme¢ of I~at ce~aln perc~ of mai property (he~inefter referred k) N
'Pro~rt~). kx:at,d In ~r County. State of Ronda. and being rr~ partJcute~ descried k~
Exhibit 'A' a~ch~d he~to ·nd trade · part hemal by mN~f~nc~.
1.01 in c~mlderatlon of the purc:~se price ·nd upon I~ terms and condltk~ hereinafter set
forth. Selle~ shall tell to Purchasar and Purchaser shall purchase from Sel~' the Propa~.
II. ~AYM;NT OF PURCHASE PRICE
2.01 The purcha~ ~ (THE "PUR~ PRICE') for the Property Ihall
HUNDRED,.J~IIIIIII~THOUSAND, :_ -- '-_ BIP AND NO/100 DOt.~
t.~o.~c,o,~,,fl..ll (u.s. Curry) pa~.~ at,m.
3.01 The Closing CI'HE 'CLOSING DATE'. 'DATE OF CLOSING'. OR 'CLOSING') of
transaction shall be held on or befO~l ninety (~0) days following execa. Rion of ~ Agreement
by Ihe Purchaser. u~less exlended by mutual wrltlen agreement of Ihe partl~ he, to. 'the
Closing f. hal be held Il h Co~ier County A~omey'l OIT~e, AdrrttnistratJon Building. 3301
Tam·ami Trail East, Naples, Florida. The Ixocedure Io be followed b~ the parties in
connection with the Closing shall I:~ as
3.011 Seller shal convey · marketable ~ free of any liens, enoJmbcances, exceptlom, or
qualir~7.atlo~l. Marketable ~ shall be determined according lo appl'<able t~e standards
adopted Iq' the Florida Bar and in ·ccordsxce with law. At the Closing. the S~lter st.al cause
to be delivered to lhe I:~'~'~ser the I~rn$ specified here~ a~ the fo4~ documents and
inslrument$ dub/executed and ec~'g, owledged. In re<aacdable Ion-n:
3.0111 War~an~ Deed in fa.to~ o¢ Purchaser oocwering fl0e to the Proc)arty. free and ~ of
all liens and encumbrances other than:
(·) The kn fo~ cur~nt t~.xe~ ·nd N~s~nenL~.
fo) Such other easements, restrlceom ac conditions of record.
3.0112 Mechanics Lien and Possession AR~avlt.
3.0113 ~inad Purchaser. Se~er clo~lng statemenL
3.0114 A "non-foreign person eff',:lavff' as required by Section 1445 of the Inlemal R~
Code.
3.0115 A W.g Form, "R~.~I Ex T~x134y~' Identlf'~.,alJon end ~t~" ~ ':: ;, ~
/
3.0116 Such InslT~mentl Is ma), be required by ~ trde Irmzr~'x:e ~m' in order to
in~u~ the *gap' Ired issue Ihe potJc, y co~tampbted by the t~ InsurtAce ~~
3.012 At t~e Closing. the P~c~s~. ~ Its rzslg~ee, sba! ~ to be to the Seler O
foaow~:
ec~t a~ e~, thai pay at ~ d dcx:ument~ st,,mp ~ due rdltS~g to t~
~ of t~e Warrar~/D#d, In acccx~ance ~ ~ 201.01, FtoHde ~, axl i~e
4.011 below, shal be patd by I:~se~,. The cost o(l~e 1file corrntltn'm'tf shM be pakf by
Seller.
3.03 Pu~chisaf I. hlfl pay for 1~4 cost o4' r~-u~lng ~ Wa~n~ ~. ~ ~ ~
a~ ~L ~stead a~ any o~r a~ e~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
~ ~ at a date ~ ~ ~nl ~s ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~
4.01 U~ e~ ~ ~ ~r~nt ~ ~ ~ ~ at ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
4.011 ~ ~n (~] da~ afl~ ~ ~le ~r~t ~r ~ f~ ~ ~
hard ~ ~ afl ex~pt~ s~ ~r~. ~aset s~a ~ ~ {~) ~. ~
o~er ~an ~n~ ~e~ ~ ~r~a[~. E any. ~ ~a~ ~ ~ ~
~1~. Pe~ ex~p~s s~ ~d~e. ~ are ~t ~ to. ~ f~:
(2) real ~ ~xes a~ assess~n~ f~ 1~7. ~ ire ~t ~t d~ a~
(3) e~ ~g~s ~ s~ ~ .~ at ~ ~ ~ ~.
4.012 If P~s~ s~ fall Io ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ ~ any s~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ex~t~ ~ .~ ~ (~) day ~, ~y ~pt ~e as R ~n ~, ~ ~ ~; ~
P~ser ~ re.hate ~ ~t~nL A fa~ by ~ser Io ~ s~ ~en ~ ~
4.013 ~ s~l ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ e~nse, ~ ~ta~ a ~t su~ ~ ~
I APRO 1997
Extd:d~ *A*. If ony. SeBer ogmes t~ fun'd~ 8ny exfsllng surveys o( ihe Property, ir ony. io
I~rchosm ~ ~ (30] daft ot'e~ o( ~"~ AgruemenL
V. I~Ia~CT1ON P~P, JC)O
s.o~l ~ ~d h~e mty (~0) deys en:rn ~e dm c4, tl~ ~ ('~xc:em
Pr~.
5.03
en~. ~r
~.01 ~r
v.. ~
7.01 ~r
8.01 ~ valero
9.01 ff ~r
~re;n
le~ ~ ~.
~s ~v~
0.02 If
~t~~~~~. ---
nldum.
10.01 &ell~ 0~1 ~ iII:x~4~ afld wlr11~ gle k:4owlng:.
10.011 ~kt ~d Purct~s4r have full hOht a.~f ~ to erfl~ Ir4o and to exec~l~ g~
Agre~ne~ end to u~dort~k~ el ~ ~d to ~ d k~ t~u(~ of ~:h l,.reunc~.
10.013 The ~ ~ fcxlh In ~ ~ thai be fu, on ~ date or,ds AOree~.fl(
and os o~ t~e date at Closing. Purc~sar's ocx:~ptaflce o~ a deed Ia the said Property ~ no~
10.014 Seller represents t~ot it has no knowledge cd' a~ ac~s, s~. ~. ~~.
10.015 NO I~rty or peflO~ olh~r li~,~n F%n'chose~ has oily rJgl~ CX' o~tJ~ lo acquire
Prol:~ el' any pcxlk~ th~r~:~.
10.016 Un'J t~e date fixed kx Ck~ing. so ~ os ~ Agreement
~ ~ ~. ~ ~t ~ ~ ~en ~nt ~ ~f
10.017 bfle~ ~ trot ~ eft no Inclnef~toq. septic finks or oesspoois o~ Iha
Pms~rty: oil waste, If an,/. W discl-,arg~d Into · public urd~f,/s4-vvef system; bier ~
t~at they have (it has) fie lu. tow4edge that any
lhe Oosing. ~er std.q ~ ~ F~'c~ser · statement (herelr~fler
, wf~dc~ provfsk~ m.~ml mqJn,+v~ II'm'C~n~. '"-v,-.,~ ,epresenm~ns is c~ t~e D~le
10.023 ~r flpfl, lenta, wl~r~n~l ~ed ~es ~ ~em~, m~. dere~ a~
10.024 ~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d~le ~ ~ ~tee~nt ~
XL ~
/
~ A~ 0 ~ 1997
't
Ik) F~MIIC.
V~h I mW kt.
Ik)kkc
3301 TIn'lll~ Trill EMI
NmI~u. ~ 34112
3301 TITIi~ TM
NI~I4. ~ ~4112
~lm J. ltd Edth C. Md
P. O. Bo~ 1B2t
NeMim, FkxIde 34101
13.04 C4p~nl Ind Mc~k3n hero,rigs con~r4d ~ I~ A~'eement am f<x' corrv~n~xz ~n~
13.05 A1 ~ Ind words ~ fn tdl AgrNn~ ~ss Mth~ ~ and gender In
whk:h utld, ll',d bi (l~ Io Ir4:l~ M~ o(her g~ylef ~. W iS h =te~ ~ h m
13.07 ff eny d~e e~c~ed k~ ~ Agt~m~ent f~q~ on · ~h.,rc~y. Sund~y o~ legM hcMd~.
~ Itm dele Io ~ ~ reference k me~ s,h~l be ex~ended to the heX1 sucoHdng
h,,, 0 t 1997
~._ 16
BCC:
DATED:.,,
-~ (Prln~ Name)
AO~,-ov~J ~s to fon'n mhd
BOAJ:(D OFC(XJNTY COMMISSIONERS
C~)LLI~FI OOUNTY, FLORIDA
He~ F. Ashtcm
Ass~st~nl Count/At, ex'ney
~. II
· ! 11
I I
II
.~iIi " il "
SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT SURETY BONDS
SUBMi'i-i'/~D PURSUANT TO CONTRACT 96-2588.
CONSIDERATIONS: On Sanuary 7, 1997 the Board of County
Commissioners awarded the referenced contract to Sovereign Construction
Cn'oup for utilities-related repairs and improvements in the Riviera Colony
subdivision. Subsequently, staffreceived executed agreements from the
awardee that included performance and payment bonds issued on behalf of
the general contractor by Preferred National Insurance, a surety that
currently carries a general policyholders' rating ofB~,: according to Best's
Key Rating Guide. Under terms of the construction agreement, the
Contractor is required to provide bonds underwriRen by a surety with a
general policyholders' rating of"A-" or better.
Staffhas discussed this variation as noted with various parties including the
contractor, the surety and the County's insurance broker. Representatives on
behalf of the ~ have advised that reinsurance in the amount of 100% of
the contract value is being provided by Winterthur Reinsurance as part of
the surety bond agreements. Winterthur is an "A' rated company. Further,
Winterthur has formally "guaranteed" the obligations of the primary surety
in the event of&fault and further authorized the Water-Sewer District to
file claims directly with them (see attached). The Risk Management
Director has reviewed the attached letter and believes that the County is
receiving adequate protection that is essentially equivalent to the
requirements of the contract. Hence, staffrecommends that the Board accept
the surety bonds as described and formally waive to the extent necessary,
any irregularities resulting from the described arrangement.
.o.)z.(,a, Jt_,
At-'~ ,3 I {997
L ,,;._ /
FLqCAL IMPACT: None.
~ROWTH MANAGEMI~NT IMPACT: N/A.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Bon~ of County Commissioners
accept the sum~ bonds as submiu~l by Sovereign Cons~ct/on Group for
contntct 96-2588 and auem,rize the ChaL,'man to sign the cons'u'uc'tion
~ent with the bonds to be included and made part of said agreement.
SUBMITTL=D BY:
Purchasing/General Services
REVIEWED BY:~
' ~iffWalker, Director
REVIEWED BY: A_ d_olfo _C~.~ez, ~/il~.r~ior Date: Office ofCapital ~%ojects
REVIEWED BY:
RaS, mond W. Miller. P.E.
Interim Public Works Administrator
A?~ U 1
February 21, 1997
Ms. Lynn A. Evans, CLA
Senior Risk Management Analyst
Collier County Government
Ad~nistrative Building
3301 East T~mtam/ Trail
Naples, Florida 34112
Prin~Lpal:
Bond No.:
Bond Amount~:
Pro3 act:
Iovereign Const~-uction Group, Inc.
P~fa=re~lNational Insurance Company
X 06512
$893,301.70 (100% ~erformance and payment)
Con~.~act No. 96-2588,
P~Lviara Colony Subdivision
Phase II Utilities Lm~rovemen=s
Dear Lynn:
Winterthur Reinsurance Corporation of America hereby agrees to
guarantee the obligations of the obligor under the referenced
bond, that, in the event of either default on the captioned Bond,
or Preferred National Insurance Company's (obligor) financial
limitations do not respond to cover any loss on the project,
Collier County Water and Sewer District (obliges) shall have the
right to make claim to Winterthur R~insurance Corporation of
America under the terms and conditions of Preferred National
Insurance Company's Bond, identified above, in the same manner
that the obligee would have made claim to Preferred National
Insurance Company had it not defaulted or was within its
financial limitations on the project.
Sincerely,
Z'=aco sen
V~ce~9~esident
ASSIST~ SECREt'S CERTIFICATE
The undersigned, A~sistant Secretary of the Winterthur
Reinsurance Corporation of America does hereby certify that
the attached rmsolu~ion is a true copy of that which appears
In and is · peL-manmnt part of the Minutes Book Meetings of
thm Board of Directors of the Corporation.
Ar"r~ U 1 igg7 !
RESOLVED ~ha= ~he form, terms and provisions of the proposed
Custodian A~reemen= be=ween ~his Corpora=ion and The Bank of New
York (the ~Cus=odian Agreement") a copy of which has been
subm/C=ed Co this meeting, providing for =he deposit of
securities wi~h the S~erin=enden= of Insurance of the S~ate of
New York as contemplated by the New York Insurance Law be, and
~he same hereby are, in all respects approved7 and further
RESOLVED thaC ~he President or any Vice President or the
Treasurer of this Corpora=ion be, and any one of =hem hereby
authorized Co execute and deliver in the name and on behalf of
this Corporation, and if re~esCed or red, red, under the
co,orate ~eal of ~i$ Co~oraCion duly attested, said Custodian
A~reemen=, subs=an~ially in ~e fo~ presented Co =his meeting,
wi~ such changes and ad~=ions =hereto and deletions therefrom
as =he officer execu=in~ ~e same shall approve, execution
=hereof by such officer =o be conclusive evidence of such
approval~ and further
RESOLVED ~haC the officers of £he Corporation be, and each of
~hem hereby is, authorized, e~owered and directed, in =he name
and on behalf of the Corpora=ion, Co do and perform all such
fur=her acts and things and =o execute and deliver, and where
necessary or appropriate file with the appropriate governmental
authorities, all such further certificates, contracts,
agreements, documents, instruments, receipts, and o~her papers,
and ~o make all such payments in the Judgmen~ of such officer or
officers shall be necessary, desirable or appropriate to carry
out, comply with and effectuate ~he foregoing resolutions and ~he
transactions contemplated =hereby.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD SURPLUS BID tS97-2648 FOR TWO (2)
SURPLUS GENERATORS .
~.~: To recognize one Cummins dleeel powered electrical generator and one
Caterpillar trailer mounted diesel powered electflcal generator as surplu~ and award the
R.B. Grove and Dixie ~Jrplue International.
CONSIDERATION: The ~ Depl~ hal two diesel powered generators to
dte~t~ose of and asked the ~ing Depmln~nt to eend out as mm surplus sealed bid.
Five bids were received (see attached tab ,heet), R.B. Grove wes the highest bidder for
the Cummins diesel power~ electrical generator, and Dixie Surplus International was
the highest bidder for the Caterpillar trailer mounted diesel powered elecflgcal
generator.
FISCAL IMPACT: Revenue will go to the Utilities Reserve Fund 408-233312-364410.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT: None.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners award surplus Bid
f~S97-2648 to R.B. Grove for the Cummins diesel powered electrical generator, and
E, bde Surplus International for the Caterpillar trailer mounted diesel powered electrical
generator.
PREPARED BY:~~~~~~~-
Rhonda L. Snell. Buyer I
REVIEWED BY:
Purchasing Director
Le<~ Och~, Jr.. w~r~nistrator ' ·
Support Se rvicee. Admini~tration
Attachment
APR- 1 1997
One C~lm' treil~r mou~
~1 ix~trtd eleca'ic~
Wimcss:
e. he,6,1L. 0~,/, l~r~huing T¢~i¢i~J
No Bids Received From:
APR' 1 1997
TABULATION FOR BI1:) #S9'/-264!
o~Nn~3 DATe ~b. 2L ~9~n/~vtsr. % ~99'~
POSTING DATE: Feb. 12, 1997
I~,rVITATIONS SENT TO:. 22 Vendon
Pqe:~ of ~-.
elecltkallena'stor TotalPrke S (,O;
~1 ~ electr~al
Senentor
$ S
$ $
Witness:
Cheryl Purchasing Techn~ ~
Bids Received From:
APR- 1 lgg7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE AND
EXECUTE THE SATISFACTIONS OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO
EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND/OR 8EWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEES
J~,,.G~,: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners acknowledge full
payment and execute the Satisfactions of Notice of Promise to Pay and Agreement to Extend
Payment of Water and/re' Sewer System Impact Fees.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida as the
Goveming Body of Collier County end as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County
Water/Sewer District of Collier County, Florida, is the owner and holder of the Nofloo of Promise
to Pay and Agreement to Extend Payment of Water and/or Sewer System Impact Fees
(Agreement) executed by:.
1.) Joseph Ballantyne, securing the principal balance of $8,040.00 plus accrued interest.
2.) Charles and Codiss Brewer, securing the principal balance of $1,500.30 plus accrued
interest.
3.) Rodney M. Case, securing the principal balance of $1,259.66 plus accrued interest.
4.) Eugene and Edna Ehlers and David and Phyllis Sadler, securing.the principal balance
of $1,500.75 plus accrued interest.
5.) Sheila Diane Gentry, secudng the principal balance of $1,260.05 plus accrued interest.
6.) Jeffrey Klein, secudng the principal balance of $1,500.75 plus accrued interest.
7.) Winifred Pike and Tony Hamm, secudng the principal balance of $1,500.30 plus
accrued interest.
8.) Resurgence Properties Inc,, securing the principal balance of $251,200,00 plus accrued
Interest,
Full payment and satisfactions of these agreements have been made.
The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the satisfactions.
FISCAL IMPACT: Payment in full of these Agreements increases the cash flow in the County's
impact fee trust accounts to approximately $3,910,160.00.
APR- ! ]997 !
GROWTI4 MANAG~_MENT IMPACT: None
~COMMENDATION: Recommendation to acknowledge full payment and the ~aflsfactions of
~ agreements and to ~urrender the ~arne c~nceled, and to direct the Clerk of Circuit Court of
Collim' County to cancel '~e ~me of record. Autlx)rlze the Chairman to execute the Satisfactions
of Nolice of Pmmi~e to Pay and Agreement to Extend P~/ment of Water and/or Sewer System
Impact Fee~.
Agefxle Date: April 1, 1997
Prepared bY:~n
Cindy Long,
Revenue Services
Revtewed
Leo Ochs Jr.. Adr~lnlstrator
Support Sewices,,/
2
RECC)~ATION TI'LAT ~ BOARD O~ COUNTY COM]Vfl$$1ONERS AUTHORIZE THE
CB. AIR. kLaN TO EXECI. ITE SATISFACTION OF LIEN DOC'UM~N'T~ FILED AGAINST REAL
PROPERTY FOR ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE AND DIRECT THE CLER~ OF COURTS TO
RECORD SAME IN TI~ PUBUC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
O~ltCnvt:: Recomm~on that ~e Board of'County Commissioners authorize the
Chairman to execute Satisfaction of Lien dooanents filed against real property for
abatement of nuisance and direct the Clerk of Courts to record same in the Public
Records of Collier County, Fiorid~
CONSIDERATIONS: The Board of County Commissioners authorized ihe filing of Liens,
for the purpose of receiving compensation for nuisance abaIemen! on thc ~ ~
described ~s follows:
b~£ EXHIBIT "A'
Said Liens were recorded in Official Record Book of the Public Records of Collier
County, Florida. The owner~ of said properties have paid to the Board of County
Commissioners sums repreaenting full payment of principal and interest due under said
Liens. Collier County has verified that said Liens have been satisfied and now requests
Satisfaaion of Lien documents and order the Clerk of Courts to record same in the Public
Records of Collier County, Florida.
FISCAL IW[PACT: None
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
RIiCO~NDATION: Thai the Board of County Commissioners authorize thc Chairman
to execute the attached Satisfaction of Lien documents filed against real property for
abatement of nuisance and dirc~ the Clerk of Courts to record same in the Public
Records of Collier County, Florida.
Prepared by: ~,.,.,. ~'.,_~ .~
Parn Cailis,ficcount Technician
Rev~. ~vices Department
Tc'/rc~ A. ~e~, Revenue
Rev~ue ~~~ent
R~nue S~ces~~t
Leo ~hs, Jr., A~is~ator
Sup~ S~~vision
Date: ~, \,~ ~,c~'-1
Date:
1. Vincent Martucci & Patricia R. Martucci, Folio #$7869120006, Lot 19, Block 343,
MARCO BEACH, Unit I O.
2. Heinz Meisinger & Herbert Meisinger, Folio #58041280006, Lot 4 Block 377,
MARCO BEACH, Unit 12.
3. Heinz Meisinger & H~rbert Meisinger, Folio #58041280006, Lot 4, Block 377,
MARCO BEACH, Unit 12.
4. Paul Ch'egg, Trustee, Folio #55251480000, Lot 37 & 38, COUNTRY CLUB
PALMETTO DUNES.
5. Linda Ann Hopper, Folio #.48174?60005, Lot 6, Block 7, GULF SHORES
6. Patrick S. Viquie & Martine Vigui¢, Folio #57208240000, Lot 26, Block 167,
MARCO BEACH, Unit 5.
7. Marlo H. Burnctt, Folio #57855480006, Lot 6, Block 329, MARCO BEACH,
Unit 10
8. Leonard J. Bubri & Nicholas Karalis, Folio #57740520000, Lot 15, Block 283,
MARCO BEACH, Unit 8.
9. David Redmond & Kinberl¥ Mor¢ira, Folio #36458720003, Lot 18, Block 268,
GOLDEN GATE, Unit ?.
10. Russell S. Morrison & Patrick K. Morrison, Folio ~49800000300, Lot 1, HIDDEN
HARBOUR AT VICTORIA PARK.
11. Marlo H. Burnett, Golio #5?855480006, Lot 6, Block 329, MARCO BEACH,
Unit 10.
12. Oamo Realty Inc., Folio #5902?400003, Lot 22, Block 790, MARCO BEACH,
Unit 25.
RECO~ATION THAT THE BOARD O£ COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AUTHORIZE THE
CHAIRMAN TO EXECUT~ SATISFACTION O£ LIEN ~ FILED AOArNST REAL
PROPERTY FOR ABA~ OF NUISANC~ AND DIRECT THE CLERK OF COURTS TO
REC~ ~ IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIE~ COUNTY, FLORIDA
Oll, rEcnVE: Recommendation th~ the Board of County Commissioners authorize the
Chairman to execu~ S~tisfaction of Lien documents filed again~ real property for
-batement of nuisance ~nd dh~'t the Clerk of Courts to r~cord same in the Public
Records of Collier County, Florida
CONSmi:RATIONS: Ti~ ~ of Coumy Commissi~ suthoriz~ thc filing of Lierus,
for th~ purpo~ ofreceivin~ compemation for nuis~.e abatemem on the real propen~
described as follows:
sgr EXHIBIT
S~id Liens ~ recorded in Officisl Record Book ofthe Public Records of Collier
County, Florida. The own~ of s~id properties have paid Io the Board of County
Commissioner~ sums r~resenfing full payment of principal and interest due under said
Liens. Collier County has verified that said Liens have been satisfied and now requests
Salisfaction of Lien documents and order the Clerk of Courts to record same in the Public
Records of Collier County, Florida.
FISCAL II~AC~: None
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IM~PACT: None
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman
to execute the attached Satisfaction of Lien documents filed against real property for
abatement ofnuisa~ce and direct the Clerk of Courts to record same in the Public
Records of Collier County, Florida.
Prepared by _ a_ ~.
Parn Callis,....Accoun! Technician
Rev~~Mces Department
Reviewed by: /~/~~ ~.~
Teresa A. Riesen, Revenue Manager
Revenue Services Departn~nt
Jo h.¥o o ,r c or )
Reviewed by: "-~ ~F-.~ ~.~
I.~o Och~, Jr., ^dmi~rator'
Support Servi~ l~/~ion
Date:
EXHIBIT
I. Dow, les L. C~tcr & Sandra G. Cm~'r, Folio #622607600005, Lot 27, Block 1 i, Naples Manor Lekes.
2. Bcrnest Brooks, Folio #36009160009, Lots 27, Block 110, Unit 3, Golden Gate..
3. Leon Blaiweiss & Dcbra Blaiweiss, Folio #57925920001, Lot 17, Block 355, Marco Beach Unit
Eleven.
4. Joseph Aflkrom, Gina Patricca, Folio #7?212520000, Lot 6, Block 4, Trail Acres.
$. Gerd Gesell, Folio #58054480000, Lot 19, Block 395, Marco Beach, Unit 12.
6. Major Walter $. Scott, Jr., & Eva N. Scot1, Folio #62206440004, Lot 27, Block ! 1, Amended Plat of'
Naples Manor Extension.
7. Peter J. Waichunas & Dolores Waichunas, Folio #27637360002, Lot 35, Block U, Conner's
Vanderbilt Beach Estates.
g. Dieter Sonderegger & Christine Sondereggcr, Folio #56803560005, Lot 20, Block 66, Marco Beach,
Unit No. 2.
9. Hamton & Shelia B. Hamton, Folio #3630584000"/, Lot 20, Block 189, Unit 6, Golden Gate.
10. Dieter Sondcreg$cr & Christine Sonderegger, Folio #56803560005, Lot 20, Block 66, Marco Beach,
Unit No. 2.
I I. Hamton & Sheila B. Harnton, Folio #36305840007, Lot 20, Block 189, Unit 6, Golden Gate.
J. Hamton, & Sheila B. Hamton, Folio #36305840007, Lot 20. Block 189, Unit 6, Golden Gate.
2. Dieter Sonderegger & Christine Sonderegger, Folio #56803560005, Lot 20, Block 66, Marco Beach,
Unit No. 2.
3. Jesus Gomez, Folio ~40357440001, The West 75~. of'East 150~ of.Tract 59 Golden Gatae Estates.
Unit No. 71.
4. Phillip Pierre, Matthew Hendrick. Folio # 36384400002, Lot 13, Block 223, Golden Gate, Unit 6, Part
1.
5. Phillip Pierre, Matthew Hendrick, Folio #36354400002, Lot 13, Block 223, Golden Gate, Unit 6, Part
l.
6. Phiilip Pierre, Matthew Hendrick, Folio #36384400002, Lot 13, Block 223, Golden Gate, Unit 6, Part
I.
7. Stewart Meehan et ux, Folio #58051240007, Lot 4, Block 392, Marco Beach, Unit 12.
8. Noreen A. Connor, Folio #579227080004, Lot 28, Block 356, Marco Beach, Unit I i.
9. Susan Downs, Marion Tuzzolo, Folio #36517600006, Lot 14, Block 2'/8, Golden Gate. Unit 8, Part 1.
10. Bonnie M. Christian, Folio #62253600004, 62253600004, LOt 14, Block 5, Naples Manor LakT ~A~. ~, ~
APR = I 1997
Pg. ,~
! !. Imperial Five Inc., Folio #$1544105150, Lot 34, Imperial Golf'Estates, Phase V.
12. James G. McCiory & Ka~hleen M. McClory, Folio #62779560000, Lot ! I, Block 67, Naples Park,
Unit 5.
13. Bonnie M. C'm'ist~ Folio #62:253600004, Lot 14, Block 5, Naples Manor Lakes.
14. Rosemary Mocio, Sandra E. Freedman, Folio #275821600001, Lo~ 4, Block $., Conner's Yanderbilt
Beach Estates, Unit 2.
15. John Fican-a, Greta l~t~'kowski, Folio #5[771720001, Lot 42, Block 591, Iv~rco 13e~h, Unit 23.
16. Harold W. Coffman & Otlie CofTn~n, Folio #359[6000005, Lots 34, Block [5, Unit 3, Golden Gate.
17. Peter Concannon, A. T. l~tagny, Dcreck HoLrnan, Kenneth Ebbrell, Graham G~son, Folio
#365104400001, Lot 10, Block 270, Golden G~te, Unit [, Part I.
18. Floreal De La Garza, Folio #62576[00002, l.m 13, Block 21, Naples Park, Unit 2.
19. Douglas M. Kelly, Folio #5737904000:3, Lot 17, Block 244, Marco Beach, Unit 6.
20. Maria Luisa Ltmeroth. Folio ~56879360006, Lot 26, Block 109, Marco Beach, Unit 3.
21. Hugh R. Ortega & Evelyn C. Ortega, Folio #36122360003, Lot 7, Block 135, Golden Gate, Unit 4.
22. Daniel Chomereau Lamotte, Suzanne Chomereau Lamotte, Folio #$7366320008, Lot 2, Block 230,
Marco Beach, Unit 6.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
REQUEST THE BOARD APPROVE AN ENGINE MODULE OVERHAUL AND
DESIGNATE TURBOMECA ENGINE CORPORTATION AS THE SOLE SOURCE
~a[,~To appropriate $19,000 for a helicopter engine module overhaul
tran~ferring the funds from Motor Pool Capital Recovery to the General Fund
Helicopter Operations Cost Center and designating Turbomeca Engine
Corporation aa the ~ole ~xxce vendor.
CONSIDERATIONS: To March 7, 1997 one of the five engine modules on the
oounty helicopter prematurely failed. All five modules are scheduled for overhaul
In December, 1997. During the budget process, BCC has approved $35,000
annually fa' the past four years to complete the required overhaul. $140,000 Is
presently held in Motor Pool Capital Recovery for this purpose. The estimated
overhaul price of the failed module Is $19,000.
The engine manufacturer, Turbomeca Engine Corporation, is the only approved
company to complete all repairs and component overhauls on Turbomeca
engines. Turbomeca Engine Corporation is, therefore, the sole source vendor.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of the engine module overhaul is estimated at $19,000.
Funds are available in Motor Pool Capital Recovery to be transferred to the
Helicopter Operations Fund 001-144510 for appropriation.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT; None
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve a
budget amendment to transfer $19,000 from Motor Pool Capital Recovery to the
General Fund, approve an expenditure of $19,000 to overhaul the failed module,
and approve Turbomeca Engine Corporation as the sole source vendor.
By:~~_____~'~'' DATE: Yx/~'/
PREPARED
..F~G. Bplton, Chief Pilot -
· DATE: ~! "!~ ~Diane_B; Fla~g~ 'Chief
REVIEWED BY~
Dep~a/rlkne.nt~.,,~rr~rgen~edic~l Services
/ /
Dan Croft, Fleet M~{'m/gem~f~nt Director
,_~ ~,~' DATE:
REVIEWED BY: ~ ~ ·
Steve d.,arnell, Purchasing Director
REVIEWED BY:'~'~' ~)/-~-"~~ ,DATE:
Leo Ochs, Admin~,~tor Support Services
~r~: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize a
Budget Amendment for rental of portable pumps and authorize an
lnorsasa to the Contract with Aksrman, Senterfitt & Eldson for
expenses which worm inadvertently omitted from the previous
authorization.
t~NBIDFAATION: In Fund 320 funds were budgeted for pumps to
divert stormwater from the Clam Bay system during this summer's
rainy season. These funds are in 183800-763100 and it is being
requested that they be transferred to 183800-644600.
On August 13, 1996 the Board of County Commissioners authorized
the procurement of services with Akerman, Sentsrfitt & Eidson to
assist in the development of a Clam Bay Restoration Plan however,
the requested authorization inadvertently omitted the
out-of-pocket expenses associated with this contract. Staff is
requesting authorization to amend the Contract with Akernan,
Santerfitt & Eidson to include the out-of-pocket expenditures
incurred under this contract.
FIBCXL IMP~CT~ The funds required for the rental of the pumps
and for an increase in the Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson Contract
are budgeted in Fund 320. The rental of the pumps is estimated
at $80,000 and a Budget Amendment transferring $80,000 from
183800-763100 to 183800-644600 is required. An increase to the
Contract with Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson in the amount of
$15,000 is requested and a Budget Amendment transferring $15,000
from 183800-763100 to 183800-631800-39915 is required.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACTs None
RZCOMMEND~TIONz That the Board of County Commissioners approve
a Budget Amendment for the rental of pumps and authorize an
increase to the Contract with Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, P.A.
PREPARED
APR- ! 1997
APPROVAL OY BUDGET AMENDMENTS
~ AGENDA OF 4~1/9T
Am. PORT A~'HO~ (~-'~,
' ' ROM:) AND BB,13~E (lei)
BUDGL'T AMENDMENT Y'/-214
Total
COMMUNIXY DEVELOPlVl]~NT (I 13i"
Dev. Comoliance - Work ~ & Control
~ O~lay
To~al
SI4,000
{14.000~
Second part of the new peffnintng and inspections computer system thst was m pm of the ovcr~li up~¢ to the
RO,~D & BmDGE (101)
BUDGET AMENDMENT 9"/-20S
op~m r~ sg,ooo
Reserves
Total
Vanderbih 13each Road being added u soon as County (OCPM) accepts construction contract as complete. Also,
experienced tn~mtJcJ~---~- _n~__{rtiofla! expendJt3Lees t,.le to spt~er system failur~irs that needed to be made.
AGENDA ITF,.M
APR - 1 1997
pg. I
BOARD OF COUNTY COHHISSIONERS
M/SCELLAR~OUS CORRESPONDENCE
April 1, 1997
FOR BOARD ACTION=
1. Ce~ficaCe of Co~Tection= NEED MOTION au~horizing the
~a--~rman to li~ Ce~ifica=e of Correc=ion ~o ~he ~ax rolls
a~ presented ~ ~he ~o~r~y Apprai~er'l Offict. ~CO~D
~PROV~ ·
2. Mi~cellaneou~ I~ems to File For Record Wi~h Action As
FILE FOR R~CO~ WI~ A~ION ~ OI~~
A. Collier County Airpor~ Authori=y Agenda - March 17,
1997. Referred to BCC.
B. Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council - February
12, 1997 and agenda for March 12, 1997. Referred to
BCC.
C. Immokalee Beautif£cat£on M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee -
January 22, 1997, February 19, 1997 and agenda for
February 19, 1997 and March 19, 1997. Referred to BCC.
D. Colltez County Planning Commission agenda - February
20, 1997. Referred to BCC.
E. Black Affairs Advisory Board - January 13, 1997.
Referred to BCC.
F. Golden Gate Beautification Advisory Committee -
February 11, 1997 and agenda for March 11, 1997.
Referred to BCC.
G. Ochopee Fire Control District Advisory Board - January
13, 1997. Referred to BCC.
H. Environmental Policy Technical Advisory Board agenda
for March 10, 1997. Refered to BCC.
I. Collier County Historical/Archaeological Preserva~ion
Board - agenda for March 13, 1997. Referred to BCC.
J. Hispanic Affairs Advisory Board agenda for March 6,
1997. Referred to BCC.
AGEN?~_,~T-TEI~1
APR -
Pgo ~' .
~ TJEAT THE BOARD OF O0UFI~ COtlMTSS~0MI:R~ SERVE A~ THE ~
~ To seek a~in=Mn= of =he Collier C~nty C~ssion as
=he c~ina~ing ~i~ for local a~lica=ion for an=i-d~g ~use
e
The Collier County Ccx~mission has participated in the
Department of C~%,,~nity Affairs' Anti-Drug Abuse grant
program for nine years.
The Collier Cou_nty Program, now under the ninth year
funding, has proven to be a valuable project.
The Department of Cowrmunity Affairs, Bureau of Cowununity
Assistance, has allocated $197,435 for State Fiscal Year
1998 funding in Collier County.
The Sheriff's Office anticipates applying for tenth year
funding for this local program.
The Department of Community Affairs requests that the
Collier County Co,Tfl/ssion continue in the capacity of
local coordinator.
,IS~WL ~A~I Twenty five (25%) percent local matching funds,
($65,812) drawn proportionate to share of funding received, from
Confiscated Trust Fund Reserves (602-919010-991000).Thim will be
budgeted in FY 98.
GRO~I~ MA~A~gM~T, Subsequent years funding in the estimated
amount of $264,000 would be sought from grants which have been
successful for 9 years. If subsequent grant funds are not
available, the program would be reevaluated and alternative funds
would be sought from the Confiscated Trust Funds as part of the
Sheriff's budget request.
~-~C(~gM~KDATIO~z
Chairperson to
responsibility
application.
That the Collier County Co~x~ission authorize the
execute the attached letter accepting the
as local coordinator for the local grant
APPROVED
DAT~,
AGENDA ITEM
Don Kunter, Shertf£ c'z
Karah 19. 19~
APR
L.
I 1997
FILE NO. ~
ROGTED TO ~
DAT~ RECETTED .'
(Ploame type ~ print}
Date: March 19. 1997
TO:
Office of the County Attorney,
Attention: _Thomas Palmer' Bsa.
Collier County Sheriff's Office
, ~inance Director
(Title)
Finance Division
Re: 1997/98 Anti Drua Abuse Act Formula Grant Proaram
(Subloc~ !
BACKGROUND OF ~rUEST/PROBLEM~
(~e~be probl~ &nd ~t~ beck~oun4 tnfor~tt~ - be specifiC, ~c2le, ~d
Board approval =o the local coordinating unit of government for the 1997/98
Anti Dru~ Abuse Act Formula Grant Program is necessary in order for the
;heriff's Office to submit a grant application. The Certification oE
Participation needs to be signed by the Chairman of the Board. The match
portion of the grant will come from the Confiscated Trust Fund.
THIS ITEM KAS/~j~I[.Q~ BEEN PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.
(If previouel¥ euJ~ltted, provide Count~, Ar.=orne¥'e Office fLle number.)
ACTION ~ZGUESTED t
{Be viz-/ epec~f2c. Identify exacr, ly what you need ~fl the way of legal ~erv~cee.)
hegel approval of forms.
C:
Don Hunter. Sheriff
All req~ee~.e umet be c'opAed to ~r a~rza~e Dzvzoz~ Head
3301 ~ Temiemi Tr~l · Hal:~. ~ 34'112.4977
(941) 774.6097 · Fix (941) 774.3602
C~ZTZ~'ZC~*I'ZC~ OF I~'fZGZl~''TZOlt
~r. Clayton H. #ilder
Department of Coemumity Affairs
Division of Housing and Cc~m~ity
Development
Bureau oi C~i~Y Assis~ance
2555 Shu~rd Oak B~levard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
Dear Mr. Wilder:
accepts the invitatxon to ser~e a, ,,,- ,
For pu~ses of coo~inating the prepara=ion of our
application(s) for grant funds with the Bureau of {Co~nity
Assistance, we have desi~ated the following person:
Name: ~
Title:
A~ency:
Address: ~ .5~..
Sincerely,
Timothy L. Hancock
Chairman, Board of
County Commissioners
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
~ pURPOSE OF SET[i,
AND COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR~A, FOR THE
OUNTY HAS CHALLE~t~v
CASE NO. 9(~K~0RP, WHEREIN THE C - - R
DOAH PLY A WATE
PROPOSED ADOPTION OF A RULE THAT WOULD Ap__ _
VESSEL "SLOW SPEED" ZONE THROUGHOUT ROOKERY BAY.
OBJECTIVE: To q~rove e Sti~ Sctllcmcnt Agrccmcnt ~ ~ ~~t of
~~~ ~~ ~) ~ ~IE~ ~W, ~ ~ ~lc ~ ~ No. 9~5~,
~y ~e D~ ~11 ~ ~ ~ ~c ~ly my sl~ ~ ~e ~bin my p~ of R~k~ Bay.
CONS~E~ONS: ~ d~ by ~e Bo~ of ~W Co~ion~ ~e ~W
A~'s Office h~ fil~ a ~pl~t to c~l~ge a Rule ~a w~ ~s~ by ~e Flod~
~~t of En~m~ ~~ ~EP). ~e ~ is mw ~fo~ ~e ~o~ ~~t of
A~~ve H~P ~~ ~ T~~. ~e DEP's ~~ Rule woul~ if ~t~ ~ly
"slow ~ ~ne" ~ v~ mo~g ~u~out all of R~k~ Bay ~i ~ a c~el ~
d~ not y~ officigly ~iff ~n~u~g ~u~out ~Y mon~ ~aely ~g ~e DEP's
~~tion to ~d (md ~t) ~e chall~g~ Rule, ~e DEP, ~e ~W's ~, md o~
~, w~ negotiat~g d~ls of m~y ~s~ ~lt wat~ v~el ~ ~ne Rul~ ~ m~y p~
of ~llio Co~W. ~e Co~W's S~ff ~li~ ~t El p~i~ ~ a~ on ~e text of all of ~e
~~ Rule c~g~, b~ ~ ~e I~ ~ute, ~ DEP, ~out ~Imtion ~ or ~put ~m ~e
~W's ~ff or m~y o~ ~ibly ~t~ ~ or ~titi~, ~d~ ~e Rule ~at is ~g
ch~l~g~ ~d ~by a~pt~ to ~ly a "slow ~ ~ne' to all of ~e wat~ of R~k~ Bay
~t ~n a ch~el. ~e ~ of ~e Co~W's Compl~ni is ~ai m~y ~i~t~ p~ns w~
~v~ no ~ ~to ~e p~ing to p~s~t ~d~ce ~g~ing ~e DEP's an~pt to ~ply ~e slow
~ wn~ to R~k~ Bay. ~ ~e pw~s~ S~l~t A~~ ~e DEP a~s to ~se ~e
ch~l~g~ Rule to ~ ~ it ~ ~iately ~or to ~e DEP's p~s~ c~ge; e.g., ~ ~11 be
no slow ~ ~ ~li~ to R~k~ Bay ~d~ ~e Rule ~ ~s~ ~ acco~ce ~ ~s
S~l~t A~t. If a slow ~ ~ne is ~ to ~ ~li~ to ~y p~ of R~k~ Bay, ~e
~ for ~fi~ of ~ch a Rule (or Rule ~~t) ~11 ~ve w ~ ova, ~by ~ord~g
~t~ ~ ~ple ~~W to p~t ~d~ for ~or ag~ ~li~tion of ~y "slow
~" ~ne ~ ~e w~ of R~k~ Bay.
~SC~ ~PA~: S~ling ~s ~e ~11 ~ve all ~~ ~al would be g~t~ by ~g ~e
~e at a h~ng ~fo~ ~ ~ Tall~s~. ~~
AGEND IT -
No.
APR 0 1 ~97
GROWTil MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None,.
Couuty Auorn~
2
APR 0 ! 1997
,~(~gl 11:14 DEP/O.C.C. TEL:904 414 122~ ?.00l
Respondent.
_/
Jj~l"!'LEM ENT AOREEM~
~REA~ th~ parties £n th~ case have conferred and desire to
amicably resolve disputed issues in the above styled matter, and
II~REASthe Intervenor in this cause has also been apprised of
dlscusnions between the parties and Joins in the desire to resolve
~nn.oe rag,ed in the above nt¥1ed matter, and
~REASall parties and Xntervenor reserve the position~ taken
in this cause without abandoning, denying or admitting al3egat£ons
or pon{Lions made or asserted in the case. and
~REAS the partie~ agree that this settlement agreement w~ll
nut be fi3ed in the iX)AH case file. but shall be retained amd
treated by them as a contract, and
Ifl~REAS the part£es and Intervenor intend to be bound by the
mutual covenants and prom£ees contained herein, and
W1{ERFJ~S the benefits of ending the uncertainty o~ litiga~ion
and other good and valuable con~ideration ha~ been exchanged by the
partt~n, a~d receipt from the other is hereby acknowledged
AGEND ITE
APR 0 1 '1997
,?[IIED) 1l:!4DEP/O. G.G. TEL:904 414 1228 P. 002
~the Rookery
appropriate.
proceedings.
NOW TREREFOR~ the parties and Intervenor agree as £ollowe:
1. Each party ohallbear their own costs, attorney's fees, and
o~her expenses incurred ~n ~his ma=Let.
2. The Responden~ DEPARTMENT OF ~NV~RONMENTAL PROTECTION
agrees to amend the sub, sc= Manatee Protection Rule such that the
rule as chan~ed by the Notice of Change published in the Florida
Administrat~ve Weekly shall be changed by~iling another Notice
Change addressing that cer~a£n par~ of the rule establishing speed
zones ~n Rooker~ Bay, so tha~ ~he speed zones shal! reflect the
plu~ or re.qula~on ~o£ Rookery ~a¥ as las~ propoued ~n the Collier
County Manatee Pro~ec~ion Plan (Collier County MPP), i.e., the
#~0/~0' speed zones. The ru~e otherwise nha~ be filed as
published by the Department, but revised to include the change in
the Rookery Bay portion from ~he rule Ianguage addressed ~n the
above-s~¥1ed rule challenge ~o tbs change said ~mmediateIy above,
so that the Rookery Bay speed re~trictions a~ they appear ~n the
current Collier County MPP are ~ncorporated ~nto ~he rule to be
~l~d for adop=ion.
The Depar~men~ reserves ~he ability, and ~he parties do not
obJec= or o~herw~se seek to prevent the DepartmenL ~rom addressing
Bay area, or other areas ~n Collier County
at a later date through ordinary rulemakin~
ThSs settlement is no~ ~ntended ~o prejudice or
~nLerfere w~h ordinary rule developmen= ae iL may occur ~rom ~ime
to Lime subsequent Lo =his agreement. DismiesaI of allegat~onn do
not bar e£milar allegations being raised in the fu=ure i~
2
APR O 1 1997
i1:14 DEP/O.G.C. TEL:904 414 1228 P. 003
appropriate; likewise, data and positions advanced by Che
Depaz~ment in this cause are not degraded or otherwise adversely
considered if the same data and proposals are used or reconsidered
in future ~ulemakin9 proceedings.
3. Upon notice and copies furnished by the Department to
COLLIER COUNTY of the Notice Of Change described a.,l~ve being
published, the above-styled rule challenge shall be voluntarily
dismissed with prejudice by Petitioner, and Intervenor will not
obj,.cc to Petit~on~.r'a action.
4. T}li8 settlement ie considered and made by all concerned
with the anticipation that the Department may desire to enter into
rule~akj~g proceedings that may revise or amend the manatee
protection speed zones in Rooker~ Bay soon in time after settling
this mat~er and the adoption o~ the Collier County Manatee Rule as
described above. The D~part~ent may publish a Notice o~ Rule
Development that may propose to rev~se or amend the manatee
pro~ection zones in ~ookery Bay within 60 days after adoption of
the Collier County rule ao described above. Any such rulemakJng
~i~l procced ~,_~LQY_~, and the matters and allegations asserted in
the in~tan~ matter wi]! not bar such ~roceedings or any legal
action related thereto nor prejudice any substan~ive or procedura~
pos£tion advanced or re~ed on in any future rule~aking proposal or
adopt, ion. Further the part~e~ agree no= to introduce in any future
p~oc~edin~ invo/v~ng the subject ~tLer of this case, ~vid~nc~ or
inference that a challenge or a particular item was asserted and
then di~m~eed or withdra~ or modified or chamged ~o acco~T~-=
AG D II M
APR 0 1 1997
.. ~?(IED} I1:15 D£PI0. G.C. T£L:904 4i4 1228 P. 004
resolution of the instant case. Any future proposals for manatee
protection subsequent to this settlement will advance without
re£erence to or reliance on thin rule challenge, or the settlement
o{ it, or the revision si the rule to accomplish this settlement.
5. If the Department in its discretion proposes future
amendments to the Collier County Manatee Rule, interested persons
and entities in Collier County wiI1 have full opportunity to
present co~nents, facts and argument aG to why proposed changes
should or should not be adopted° as part o[ ordinary rulemaking
proceedings. The D~.p&rtment is not estopped or prejudiced by this
settlement or re~olution of this case from re-propoBing the Rookery
Bay speed limits that were the subject matter of this case, or
other protection measures as determined in the future, so long as
the Department advances luturs rule~aking proposals through the
ordinary rule~aking process.
~[ER~FORE, the parties and Intervenor consent to the terms and
conditions s~a~ed above for the purpo~ o£ finally and forever
resolving the iss~les rai~ed in the above styled adminis~rative rule
challenge, and
WI~! INTENT TO BE B00ND by said. terms and conditions,
including the intent to fully perform the mutual covenants recited
herein, and to obtain the benefits each anticipates from the
performa~tce promi~ed to the other, the parties and Intervenor
execute thio Settlement Agreement by signing below:
· ,J?(I~D) I]:16
TEL:904 414 1221
P, 001
FOR Petit. Loner C::C)LLIBR couFry~
BOARD Of' ~ CCXUIIBSXOIIBRB
FOR Reepomlent. DBPRRTHENT OF
B~VZR~~ PROTECTIOI9:
dated:.,
s
'~pr:Lnt:' name)
del:adj.
DI~IGHT E. BI~XX, CLE~
FOR In:ervenor ~AVE THE MANATEE CLUB, INC.
s
A,°R 0 1 L~g7