The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 01/13/2004 RCOLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA January 13, 2004 9:00 a.m. Tom Henning, Chairman, District 3 Donna Fiala, Vice - Chair, District 1 Frank Halas, Commissioner, District 2 Fred W. Coyle, Commissioner, District 4 Jim Coletta, Commissioner, District 5 NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 99 -22 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS ". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL RECEIVE UP TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS THE TIME IS ADJUSTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112, (239) 774 -8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. lannary 13 ?nnA 1. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. AGENDA AND MINUTES A. Approval of today's regular, consent and summary agenda as amended. (Ex Parte Disclosure provided by Commission members for summary agenda.) B. December 2, 2003 — BCC Regular Meeting C. December 9, 2003 — BCC/Tourist Development Council Workshop D. December 10, 2003 — BCC /Land Development Code Meeting E. December 16, 2003 — BCC Regular Meeting F. December 19, 2003 — BCC /AUIR Workshop 3. SERVICE AWARDS 4. PROCLAMATIONS A. Proclamation to designate the week of January 18 -24, 2004 as Purple Martin Week. To be accepted by Jerry Glasson, President of the Purple Martin Society - of Collier County. B. Proclamation to designate the week of January 25 -31, 2004 as Catholic Schools Week in Collier County. To be accepted by Miss Paula Lombardo, Principal, St. Elizabeth Seton Catholic School. 5. PRESENTATIONS A. SELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN B. Presentation of Distinguished Flying Cross to Charles Bishop by Senator Burt L. Saunders. 6. PUBLIC PETITIONS A. Public Petition request by Mr. Richard Lydon to discuss Master Plan for Vanderbilt Beach Beautification M.S.T.U. 2 .lanimry 13 9nnA 7. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be Provided by Commission members. Petition number VA- 2003 -AR -4768, for an 1.8 foot after - the -fact variance from the required 7.5 feet and 5.7 feet for the existing shed on the north side of the property and a 7.3 foot after - the -fact variance from the side yard setback requirement of 7.5 feet to 0.2 feet for the existing pool and screen enclosure on the south side of the property in the "MH- ACSC /ST" mobile home zoning district with an area of critical state concern /special treatment zoning overlay, on property hereinafter described in Collier County, Florida. B. This item continued from the December 2, 2003 BCC Meeting. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. CU- 2003 -AR -4524, James B. Malless, AICP, of Wireless Planning Services, LLC, representing Pinnacle Towers Inc., requests Conditional Use #13 of the "A" Rural Agricultural Zoning District for the purpose of a 700 -foot guyed communications tower per Section 2.6.35 of the Collier County Land Development Code. The property to be considered for the conditional use is located in Section 3, Township 51 south, Range 26 east, Collier County, Florida. This property consists of 14.55+ acres. C. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. VA- 2003 -AR -4525 for: A variance of 690 feet from the minimum separation requirement from residential zoning of 1,750 feet to 1,060 feet; a variance of 450 feet from the required maximum height limitation of 250 feet to 700 feet for towers in an agricultural side yard setback to 24 feet for a single guy anchor point in an agricultural zoning district on property hereinafter _. described in Collier County, Florida. 8. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A. Appointment of members to the Library Advisory Board. B. Appointment of members to the County Government Productivity Committee. C. Appointment of members to the Citizens Advisory Task Force. D. Appointment of members to the Code Enforcement Board. E. Appointment of members to the Radio Road Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee. F. This item to be heard at 10:30 a.m. Intent to motion to obtain Board reconsideration on usage of Federal Aviation Grants. (Commissioner Henning) 3 .lanimm 111 9nnd 10. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT A. This item to be heard at 11:00 a.m. Discussion of access to Eatonwood Lane and Livingston Road from the Hiwasse Property, located at the northeast corner of Livingston Road and Eatonwood Lane, east of Kensington Park PUD, in Section 13, Township 49 south, Range 25 east. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) B. This item to be heard immediately following 10E. Receive an update and provide input for the County Road 951 Project Development and Environment (PDBE) Study, from Immokalee Road to Alico Road in Collier and Lee Counties. (Norman Feder, Administrator, Transportation Services) C. Alternative road impact fee calculation for Shelton Jaguar /Land Rover dealership replacement facility. (Norman Feder, Administrator, Transportation Services) D. Adopt a resolution authorizing the acquisition by condemnation, if necessary, of perpetual, non - exclusive road right -of -way, drainage and /or utility easements, which will be required for the construction of roadway, drainage and utility improvements for the Golden Gate Parkway /Airport- Pulling road Grade Separated Overpass Project (Project No. 60006). Fiscal impact: $4,500,000.00. (Norman Feder, Administrator, Transportation Services) E. This item to be heard at 1:00 p.m. Authorize the expenditure of budgeted funds for the development of Best Friend Park. (John Dunnuck, Administrator, Public Services) F. To approve the purchase of a 50 -acre parcel of land located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Goodlette -Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway for the purpose of providing for drainage improvements, transportation improvements and environmental protection. (Fiscal impact: Up to $20,000,000) 11. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 13. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 14. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 15. STAFF AND COMMISSION GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS 4 _ nnuary 13 9nnd 16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1) Request to grant final approval of the roadway (private), drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Habitat Village ", the roadway and drainage improvements will be privately maintained, the water and sewer improvements will be maintained by Collier County. 2) Board of County Commissioners acting as the Community Redevelopment Agency. To approve the change of the designated payee for previously approved out of pocket expenditures related to the Bayshore Christmas Walk Art Festival. 3) Petition AVESMT2003- AR4693 to vacate, renounce and disclaim the easement for public road right of way recorded by separate instrument in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Located in Section 35, Township 48 south, Range 26 east, Collier County, Florida. 4) Petition CARNY- 2003 -AR -5175, John Yonkosky, Treasurer, Collier County Fair and Exposition, Inc,. requesting a permit to conduct a fair from January 30 through February 8, 2004, at the Collier County Fair Grounds on Immokalee Road (CR 846), North Golden Gate Estates. 5) Request to approve for recording the final plat of "Saba) Bay Commercial Plat Phase Two" and approval of the Standard Form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the Performance Security. 6) Request to approve for recording the final plat of "Delasol Phase Three ", and approval of the Standard Form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the Performance Security, and accept the County Park Dedication Agreement. B. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 1) Recommendation to award Bid No. 04 -3591 — "Furnish and Deliver Five (5) Crew Cab Flat Bed Dump Trucks" to Wallace International in the amount of $279,950. 2) Approve the transfer by deed of a portion of property owned by the Collier County Water -Sewer District ( "District') to Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ( "County "), and approve reimbursement to district in an amount equal to the pro -rated purchase price paid for the property by district for the construction of a six -lane section of Vanderbilt Beach Road (Project No. 63051). Estimated fiscal impact: $12,381. 3) Adopt a resolution authorizing the acquisition by gift or purchase of perpetual, non - exclusive road right -of -way, drainage and utility easements, 5 Aanuary 11 7nnd and temporary construction easements, which will be required for the installation of signal system mast arm assemblies and control boxes at intersections at SR 29 and Immokalee Drive, at SR 29 and I" Street in Immokalee, and at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Tropicana Boulevard. Estimated fiscal impact: $5,100. 4) Approve modification to correct a Scrivener's Error to Contract Amendment No. 1 with Apac- Southeast, Inc., regarding Immokalee Road Improvement Project; Project No. 60018 (no fiscal impact). 5) Approve selection committee ranking of firms for contract negotiations for RFP #04 -3587 "Engineering and Design Services for Roadway and Capacity Improvements to County Barn Road from County Road 864 to State Road 84 ", County Project No. 60101. 6) Approve Work Order Amendment No. 1 for a decrease of $33,924 to the contract for consulting engineering and inspection services by KCCS for the Davis Boulevard and Collier Boulevard Intersection Improvements, Project No. 60170. C. PUBLIC UTILITIES 1) Approve two easements to be deeded to Florida Power and Light Company to provide new electric power service to the North County Water Reclamation Facility, Projects 739501 and 739502, at no cost. 2) Approve a Budget Amendment from Solid Waste Operations to Solid Waste Capital Projects to design recycling and hazardous waste collection centers, Project 59003, in the amount of $375,500. 3) Approve a work order, under Contract #01 -3271, Fixed Tenn Professional Engineering Services, for Coastal Zone Management Projects, with Taylor Engineering for Caxambas Pass dredging and South Marco Island beach renourishment, Project 90500, in an amount not to exceed $206,000. 4) Authorization to participate in a demonstration project with the National Biosolids Partnership and approve a Letter of Understanding between the Collier County Wastewater Department and the National Biosolids Partnership at no cost to the county. 5) Approve Work Order ME- FT -04 -02 with Metcalf and Eddy for professional engineering services for the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant Emergency Generator Switchgear Upgrades Project, Contract 00 -3119, in the amount of $247,438, Project 70069. 6) Approve a Tourist Development Category "A" Beach RenourishmenUMaintenance Grant Application, a Budget Amendment, and an Engineering Services Work Order to seek modification to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Permit for maintenance dredging of Wiggins Pass, Project 90522, in the amount of $15,000. 7) Adopt a resolution approving a policy governing the sale of reclaimed water to the Unincorporated Area of Collier County. 6 .1aneiar, V% 9nnd D. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Approve an amendment to an agreement with Stock Development, LLC, for the installation of upgraded sports field lighting at Eagle Lakes Community Park at no cost to Collier County. 2) Approve Work Order #SC- 02 -57, Contract 02 -3349, in the amount of $77,247 to Surety Construction, General Contractors, for the construction of a screen porch addition at the Marco Island Library. E. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1) Report to the Board of County Commissioners concerning the sale and transfer of items associated with the County Surplus Auction of December 13, 2003, resulting in $9,482.90 in net revenues. 2) Recommendation to award RFP No. 03 -3568, County-Wide Exotic Vegetation Removal (estimated value $500,000.00). 3) Approve and authorize the execution of a temporary lease agreement with Sarasota County and pay for office services not to exceed $3,000. The office space will be occupied for a two -month period by the Special Prosecutor of the State Attorney's Office during the proceedings of State of Florida v. John Calhoun Norris and Robert Paul Hardy in Sarasota County, Florida. 4) Approval of a resolution granting limited settlement authority to the Risk Management Director under the County's Property, Casualty, and Workers' Compensation Insurance Programs. 5) Report and ratify staff - approved change orders and changes to work orders to Board - approved contracts. 6) Authorization to add two position classification titles to the Fiscal Year 04 Pay and Classification Plan. 7) Award a contract to Schenkel and Shultz, Inc., for architectural services for 'the Naples Jail Center, revised Contract Number 98- 2867 -2004, in the amount not to exceed $845,510.00. F. COUNTY MANAGER 1) Approval of Budget Amendment Report— BA #04 -080 in the amount of $8,415 for unanticipated renovation expenses for the main house at Robert's Ranch. G. AIRPORT AUTHORITY H. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 1) Miscellaneous items to file for record with action as directed. J. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 7 lanuary 11 ?nnd 1) That the Board of County Commissioners make a determination of whether the purchases of goods and services documented in the Detailed Report of Open Purchase Orders serve a valid public purpose and authorize the expenditure of County funds to satisfy said purchases. A copy of the Detailed Report is on display in the County Manager's Office, Collier County Government Center, 2 "d Floor, W. Harmon Turner Building, Naples, FL. K. COUNTY ATTORNEY 1) Authorize the payment of planning fees in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. GJR of Naples Inc., et at, Case No. 02- 2212 -CA (Immokalee Road Project #60018). 2) Approve the agreed order awarding attorney fees relative to the easement acquisitions of Parcels 114, 115 and 116 in the lawsuit styled Collier County v. Centex Homes, et a/, Case No. 02- 1602 -CA (Good lette-Fra n k Road Project No. 60134). 3) Approve the Mediated Settlement Agreement and a Stipulated Final Judgment to be drafted incorporating the same terms and conditions as the Mediated Settlement Agreement relative to the acquisition of Parcel 129 in the lawsuit styled Collier County v. James R. Colosimo, Trustee, et al, Case No. 00- 0138 -CA (Pine Ridge Road, Project No. 60111). 17. SUMMARY AGENDA - THIS SECTION IS FOR ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1) A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF; 2) UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OR OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OF ALL MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING; 3) NO WRITTEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE ITEM RECEIVED BY STAFF, THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OR THE BOARD, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE BCC MEETING ON WHICH THE ITEMS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD; AND 4) NO INDIVIDUALS ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE ITEM. FOR THOSE ITEMS, WHICH ARE QUASIJUDICAL IN NATURE, ALL PARTICIPANTS MUST BE SWORN IN. A. Petition RZ- 2003 -AR -4080, Hibiscus Church, requesting a rezone from "GC" Golf Course to "CF" Community Facility for a church for property located at the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Doral Circle, in Section 19, Township 50 south, Range 26 east, Collier County, Florida. B. This item reauires that all Darticiriants be sworn in and ex carte disclosure be Provided by Commission members. CUR - 2003 -AR -3776 request by William L. McDaniel for a conditional use re- review of CU -98 -12 for property located at 4125 Oil Well Road (CR 858), further described as Section 16, Township 48 south, Range 28 east, Collier County, Florida. C. This item reauires that all Darticiaants be sworn in and ex Darte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition AVPLAT2003- AR4700 to disclaim, �- renounce and vacate the county's and the public's interest in a portion of the 15 foot wide county utility easement located in Tract "D ", according to the plat of "Riverchase Shopping Center" as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 19 through 20, 8 .lanuary 13 ?nnA Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Located in Section 22, Township 48 south, Range 25 east. D. A resolution by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, requesting the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) to extend the termination date of the County's CDBG Award Agreement for a Community Development Block Grant under the Economic Development category that provided for a portion of the construction of the Manufacturing Facility II at the Immokalee Regional Airport Industrial Park. E. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. PE- 2003 -AR -4261, Doug Schroeder, Executive Director of the Cocohatchee Nature Center, requesting a parking exemption to allow off -site parking via a shared parking agreement, pursuant to LDC §2.3.4.1.2.C., between the Cocohatchee Nature Center and the Pewter Mug. Access between the properties will be via a proposed pedestrian walkway under the U.S. 41 Bridge over the Cocohatchee River. The Cocohatchee Nature Center is located at 12345 Tamiami Trail North, in Section 21, Township 48 south, Range 25 east, Collier County, Florida. 18. ADJOURN INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 774 -8383. 9 laneiary 1.1 ?nnA AGENDA CHANGES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETING January 13, 2004 Continue Item 10F to January 27 2004 BCC meeting: To approve the purchase of a 50 -acre parcel of land located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Goodlette -Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway for the purpose of providing for drainage improvements, transportation improvements and environmental protection. (Staff request.) Add On Item 12A: Recommendation that the Board consider and reject Aquaport Plantiffs' attempt to alter terms of the settlement agreement between Aquapo Plaintiffs and individual Commissioner defendants after the fact rt , at least to the extent County funds are at issue. (Staff request.) Withdraw Item 16A1: Request to grant final approval of the roadway drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Habitat V llage ",the roadway and drainage improvements will be privately maintained, the water and sewer improvements will be maintained by Collier County. (Staff request.) Move Item 16C6 to 10G: Approve a Tourist Development Category "A" Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Grant Application, a budget amendment and an Engineering Services Work Order to seek modification to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Permit for maintenance dredging of Wiggins Pass, Project 90522, in the amount of $15,000. (Commissioner Halas request.) Move Item 16E4 to 10H: Approval of a resolution granting limited settlement authority to the Risk Management Director under the County's Property, Casualty and Workers' Compensation Insurance Programs. (Commissioner Coyle request.) TIME CERTAIN ITEMS: Item 9F to be heard at 10:30 a.m. Intent to motion to obtain Board reconsideration on usage of Federal Aviation Grants. Item 10A to be heard at 11:00 a.m. Discussion of access to Eatonwood Lane and Livingston Road from the Hiwasse property, located at the northeast corner of Livingston Road and Eatonwood Lane, east of Kensington Park PUD, in Section 13, Township 49 south, Range 25 east. Item 10B to be heard immediately following Item 10E: Receive an update and provide input for the County Road 951 Project Development and Environment (PD &E) Study, from Immokalee Road to Alico Road in Collier and Lee Counties. Item 10E to be heard at 1.00 p.m. Authorize the expenditure of budgeted funds for the development of Best Friend Park. PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, in a very short time, thousands of our very beautiful feathered friends, the Purple Martins, will return from their winter home in Brazil; and, WHEREAS, these birds will be searching for suitable housing to enable them to nest and rear their young; and, WHEREAS, the Florida Legislature has designated Collier County the PURPLE MARTIN CAPITAL OF FLORIDA; and WHEREAS, the 'Purple Martin Society of Collier County" is desirous of urging the public to erect proper housing for these very valuable ► vnged creatures by placing said houses on their property; and WHEREAS, during the period of January 18 -24, 2004, the Purple Martin Society of Collier County will endeavor to alert the public to how valuable these birds are in helping to diminish the insect and mosquito population. NOW THEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that the week of January 18 -24, 2004 be designated as: PURPLE MARTIN WEEK in Collier County and urge all citizens to Join with the Purple Martin Society of Collier County to show their concern for these valuable and friendly winged creatures and learn to protect and preserve them. DONE AND ORDERED i m.La 1 srn uoy.of January 2004. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST. DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN AGENDA ITEM No._-- -�— -- 13 rr P9- +Y PROCL AMA TION WHEREAS, Catholic schools throughout the United States of America will celebrate Catholic Schools Week on the last week of January; and WHEREAS, approximately 2, 000 students in Collier County are currently enrolled in Catholic schools which include: St. Elizabeth Seton, St. Ann's, St. John Neumann, and Royal Palm Academy,' and WHEREAS, Catholic education in Collier County now also includes post - secondary studies with the new arrival of Ave Maria University; and WHEREAS, the National Catholic Education Association has announced this year's theme to be A Faith - Filled Future; and, WHEREAS, students enrolled in area Catholic schools devote numerous hours of service towards the improvement of our community; students develop leadership qualities and a sense of responsibility to others; they come to know that their actions can make a significant difference in their community, their nation and in the world; and, WHEREAS, the goal of Catholic education is to educate the mind, the heart, and the moral character of every child; to instill in each child a sense of self worth and accountability; and WHEREAS, the tremendous effort of Catholic school students, parents, and teachers continues to play a key role in promoting and ensurirq a brighter, stronger future for all NOW THEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that the week of January 25' through January 31" be designated as CATHOLIC SCHOOLS WEEK IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA and urge all citizens to remember the impact that Catholic education has had in our area and encoumge everyone to join a# Catholic schools in this celebration. DONE AND ORDERED THIS 13"' Day of January, 2004 ATTEST: DWI6HT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TOM HENNIN6, CHAIRMAN AGEND,A,ITEM No.— JAN 13 2004 COLLIER COUM' N/IANAGER' S OFFICE ;30I East Tamiarni Trail * \aplc�. I i. ?-f I i 239 - -77-1 -8383 + Fax 239 -774 -4010 December 23, 2003 Mr. Richard E. Lydon, Chairman Vanderbilt Beach M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee 2685 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 Re: Public Petition Pequest to Discuss Master Plan for Vanderbilt Beach Beautification MSTU Dear Mr. Lydon: Please be advised that you are scheduled to appear before the Collier County Board of Commissioners at the meeting of January 13, 2004, regarding the above referenced subject. Your petition to the Board of County Commissioners will be limited to ten minutes. Please be advised that the Board will take no action on your petition at this meeting. However, your petition may be placed on a future agenda for consideration at the Board's discretion. Therefore, your petition to the Board should be to advise them of your concern and the need for action by the Board at a future meeting. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. in the Board's Chambers on the Third Floor of the W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F ") of the government complex. Please arrange to be present at this meeting and to respond to inquiries by Board members. If you require any further information or assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, James V. Mudd County Manager JVM /jb cc: David Weigel, County Attorney Joe Schmitt, Administrator, C.D. &E.S. JAN 13 /Z 1�'I C U ie .S.T.U. Advisory Committee 2685 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 December 12, 2003 Mr. James Mudd, Manager Collier County Naples, FL Dear Mr. Mudd: Vanderbilt The Vanderbilt Beach Municipal Services Taxing Unit has entered into a contract with Wilson Miller to prepare a Master Plan for the area covered by our unit. Meetings and direct mail communications with all of the residents have carefully defined the scope of service. A series of meetings will be held as the study progresses in order that everyone will be familiar with just what is being planned as well as the methodology of implementation. The purpose of this letter is to request that the writer be granted the opportunity to discuss this action with the Board of County Commissioners and to request their approval of county financial participation in this project at one of their meetings. The time and date for this presentation is left in your good hands so that the timing will not overburden a BCC agenda. It is. however, requested that an early date in January 2004 be considered, as we will be moving forward with our goal of completion in the spring. Please give me a call if you need further information prior to setting a date. Thank you in advance for your usual fine cooperation. Respectfully submitted, R. E. Lydon Richard E. Lydon, Chairman Cc: Frank Halas, Commissioner JAN t 2'a �� EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PETITION NUMBER VA- 2003 -AR- 4768, FOR AN 1.8 FOOT AFTER - THE -FACT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 7.5 FEET TO 5.7 FEET FOR THE EXISTING SHED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AND A 7.3 FOOT AFTER- THE -FACT VARIANCE FROM THE SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 7.5 FEET TO 0.2 FEET FOR THE EXISTING POOL AND SCREEN ENCLOSURE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY IN THE "MH- ACSC /ST" MOBILE HOME ZONING DISTRICT WITH AN AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN /SPECIAL TREATMENT ZONING OVERLAY, ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. OBJECTIVE: Staff is requesting that the Board review staff s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the CCPC regarding the above reterenced Variance petition and render a decision as the Board of Zoning Appeals regarding the petition pursuant to LDC Section 2.7.5.12. CONSIDERATIONS: t� The applicant is requesting an after -the fact variance in the Mobile Home (MII) zoning district with an Area of Critical State Concern/Special Treatment Overlay (N41i- ACSC /ST) from the minimum required 7.5 foot side yard setback, (west and east boundary), to allow an .2 foot side yard setback for a pool and screen enclosure on the west side of the property, and to allow a 5.7 feet side yard setback for a shed on the east side of the property. The amount of variance requested is 7.3) feet on the west side of the property and 1.8 feet on the east side of the property. This property is located in an older unrecorded mobile home subdivision identified as Plantation Island. The applicant placed his mobile home on this property in 1978. Ile placed the shed on the property in 1981, and the screen enclosure and pool in 2000. Fees for "After- The - Fact" construction are calculated at four times the cost of permits that are $250. or less, and t�vo times the cost of permits that are greater than $250. The staff found that the lot met the minimum lot area requirements for the MH zoning district. The shed and the screen enclosure and pool were constructed without building permits. The placement of these accessory structures outside of the minimum setback requirements reduce the minimum separation between structures on the adjoining lots, which adversely impacts the desired light and air standards designed for this zoning district. The staff found no land related hardships associated with this variance request. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this petition will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page 1 of 4 tda — JAN 13 2004 _ q GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of this variance will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth Management Plan, there fore there is no Growth Management Impact Associated with this Executive Summary. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: There are no environmental issues associated with this petition. HISTORIC /ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: Staff's analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is not located within an Area of Historical and Archaeological Probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no survey or waiver of Historic and Archaeological Survey & Assessment is required. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC did not review this petition because the EAC does not normally hear variance petitions. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING C01IMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The applicant provided a petition of support from 11 property owners in Plantation Island, the County received two letters from property owners in Plantation Island in support of this request, and the staff had received three telephone calls of support from property owners in Plantation Island. The CCPC believed that denying this variance request would create a practical hardship on the applicant, and that the request would not be injurious to the neighborhood, or detrimental to the public welfare. This petition was heard at the December 18, 2003, CCPC meeting. The Commission unanimously approved -a motioned (8 -0) to forward petition. VA- 2003- AR -476R n r ,,moon t ond_ation of APPROVAL, subject to the following conditions: 1. The variance '3 limited to 1.8 feet for the side yard setback for a shed on the north side of the property, and for a pool and screen enclosure on the south side of the property, as depicted in the applicant's site plan. prepared by Mel Nathan, titled Lot 38 Plantation Island, prepared March 4, 2003, and stamped received September 29, 2003, except as further restricted below. This site plan is included as Exhibit A; 2. If the residential dwelling structure is destroyed for any reason, to an extent equal to or greater than 50 percent of the actual replacement cost of the structure at the time of its destruction, all reconstruction of the accessory structures must conform to the provisions of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of reconstruction; 3. A visual barrier must be constructed inside the western side of the screen enclosure by the applicant within three months from the approval of this variance request; 4. The applicant must apply for building permits for the shed, screen enclosure, and pool within three months of the approval of this variance request. Na. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page 2 of 4 1 JAN 13 2004 PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that there were no land related hardships. An economic hardship for the removal of the accessory structures is not justification for a recommendation of approval by the staff. Staff therefore recommended that the CCPC forward Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4768 to the BZA with a recommendation of denial. No.__4_^k-_ JAN 13 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page 3 of 4 pg. 3 PREPARED BY: Iv1IE EI. J. DERUNTZ, CF M, PRINCIPAL PLANNER. DATE DEPARTMENT`OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEWED BY: Y BELLOWS, CHIEF PLANNER DAT DEPARTMENTI' OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 'USAN MIIRRAY, AICP, ACTING 61RECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: JOSEP K. SCI ff , ADN ISTRATOR DATE E CONY UNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION tdo._____�_ -- JACK 13 ?001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page 4 of 4 pg'- AGENDA ITEM 8 -C STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLAi®NING COMMISSION FROM: MICHAEL J. DERUNTZ, CFM DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 18, 2003 SUBJECT: PETITION VA- 2003 -AR -4768 PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: OWNER: Albert Dowacter P.O. Box 342 38 Clary Ct. Everglades City, FL 34139 REQUESTED ACTION: AGENT: Craig R. Woodward, Esquire P.O. Box 1 606 Bald Eagle Drive, Suite 500 Marco Island, FL 34145 The applicant is requesting an after- the -fact variance in the Mobile Home (MH) zonin;; district with an Area of Critical State Concern/Special Treatment Overlay (MH- ACSC /ST) for two structures: a 1.8 -foot variance from the required 7.5 -foot side yard setback to 5.7 feet for a shed, and a 7.3 -foot variance from the required 7.5 -foot side yard setback to 0.2 feet for a pool and screen enclosure. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject parcel is located at 38 Clary Court, further described as the Plantation Island, Unit 2, Lot 38, in Section 24, Township 53 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida (See Location Flap — Exhibit 1). JAN 13 2004 VA- 2003 -AR -4768 CCPC MEETING 12/18/03 1 1- Pg' S - io �z D D i � M �co r- 0 D O Z D m D a7 1-75 R S.R. 951 CO C.R. 351 O Q b 0 �c� r � O � O � D � O O Z m m o �p� a o A o R= •\ ^ ° 5 R. 29 7 � c a f� I I . f) *- Cl) CD ;ro no ro M r i �x m �oZ t :V 03 r 0 r a D d x r r- ;° m M u N° r V v Z > vmi A 0 c7 0z oN rn � O 00 �L z 0 E* o� 0 m t� z' D n (n O rn 0 Z m �o Z U) m�z A� 0 z 00 4. 0 rn z co rn 0 o OD o fU v v O cn 0 0 b CL PLANTATION PARKWAY W 0 0 N00'23'52 "E 60.15' (F) N00' 16' 1 1 "E (D) (a) M„ 1.0I,.00S (d),66'69 M"91,Z£.00S n 7,LNflu3a amii,u £0 /6Z /6 :3,L` (l IVOOL0£OOZ# LD3fOUd 89Lj7-'dV- £00Z-VA O 'T1 D m O O v m z m z !7 rn d AGENMAIT' V JAN 13 2004 EXHIBIT 2 ,09'66Z M. i 1,91.00S m z v 4 °N Z 0 0 rn m mro N ,m �v rrn I z -rl 0 n o c z cc 0 rn II C rn N cl! r R, O M V) Z n m ; z o ao m n O O 0 C c ;u m m v w m v v 00 I 831Nlf1d - _ .l .. 1CM'tcy� 00 ',. �� 1 N� 1 (a) M„ 1.0I,.00S (d),66'69 M"91,Z£.00S n 7,LNflu3a amii,u £0 /6Z /6 :3,L` (l IVOOL0£OOZ# LD3fOUd 89Lj7-'dV- £00Z-VA O 'T1 D m O O v m z m z !7 rn d AGENMAIT' V JAN 13 2004 EXHIBIT 2 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks a variance to allow an existing shed on the north side of the property and a pool and screen enclosure on the south side of the property to remain. This property is located in the Plantation Island subdivision. Plantation Island subdivision is an old mobile home subdivision that was platted, but not recorded. The petitioner purchased this property in 1978 and placed the existing trailer on it within one year (Building Pen-nit #79- 3676). The shed was placed on the property in 1981. The petitioner states that it was placed to meet the minimum setback requirement (7.5 feet) as measured from the existing wooden fence. This fence was positioned on the northern property line, as measured from a metal fence, which had been a historic boundary between Lots 38 and 39. The pool and screen enclosure were constructed in 2000. The petitioner did not apply for a pen-nit for the shed, pool, or the screen enclosure. The property owner has been notified by Collier County that these strictures are in violation of the Land Development Code (LDC) for being constructed without a permit and for encroachment into the minimum building setback area (Case Number 2003020046). Access to this property is provided via Plantation Parkway. Plantation Parkway is a County - maintained roadway from Highway 21 (Collier Avenue South) to the Plantation Island subdivision. It then transitions into a pri%atc roadway. County records indicate that since 1987, t,,vo variances have been previously approved in the Plantation Island subdivision. V -87 -7 %v-,is for a front yard setback variance of 20.6 feet on the north side of Flamingo Drive East, and V -91 -4 leas for a side yard setback variance of 7 feet at 67 West Flamingo Drive. Since 1901, iio variances have been applied for in this area. The petitioner indicates that the primary reason for the need for the shed variance, is that the petitioner, when erecting his shed, erroneously relied on a historically accepted property boundary marker (fence), althor. '.- ', :.;'..:::: t., jt was obtained. For the pool, the petitioner offers no reason for the lack of building permit or the failure to recognize a setback requirement. The petitioner provides a letter from his physician stating that the pool provides aquatic exercise that the petitioner needs for his lower back pain (See Exhibit 3 — Doctor's Letter). As a matter of record, the petitioner also provides a letter of no objection from the adjacent property owner to the south, regarding the existing pool and screen enclosure (See Exhibit 4 — Neighbor's Letter). A petition has also been submitted in support of the variances from the surrounding property owners (See Exhibit 5 - Petition). The County has also received letters in support of these variance requests (See Letters — Exhibit 6). AGENDA ITEM 00._ ! JAN 13 ZOC.4 P5. 9 VA- 2003 -AR -4768 CCPC MEETING 12/18103 2 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SURROUNDING: North: mobile home, zoned 'IH- ACSC /ST East: channel, zoned IIH- ACSC/ST South: mobile home, zoned MH- ACSC /ST West: private street and mobile homes, zoned N`IH- ACSC /ST 7d 1T lg t 9N 13 19 T A 1 4 42 43 LAN I A ICON OMVE -7 2.g 1 Q 50 `J9 J 55 44 1w Ya J- 3 P4 >P 37 3t N 7B Yc ` 77 S! 6 Bt w 5® 23 6 !E 71 71 .cj d. d. 1� d M 2E 4 ® 10 81 ,t a b` 72 15 7'1 73 en YA �1 a7 63 €I 9�9 1 @4 23 43 1 1V 1 n 40 St® 11 a 111 117 a 991 194 114 < VL A6'ffJ= CPS 'Rl, IT 10 1 i Z 1 44 3 37 tii 11 9 8 •° - t' so i7 931E 09 zo 10 gp 17 i e91a { �ti a. EXHIBIT 7 1 VA- 2003 -AR -4768 CCPC MEETING 12/18/03 3 JAN 13 s � � ,x• is # �'�,� L "� � . +V� MAU YT i f t �.. ,mss r'�- .:~• r y� -a v IL s si sak SUBJECT `x PROPERT� t VW I 0 ' _ �_ -.._ - EXHIBIT 8 C,ENDA ITEM JAN 13 M' GRDAVTH 'M:AN AGEMENT PL.-AN (G11P) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located in the "Urban Residential Subdistrict' designation of the Future Land Use Map of the GMP. This land use category is described in the GMP as follows: "The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated.." The GMP does not address individual variance requests; it focuses on the larger issue of the actual use. The LDC authorizes the shed and pool as permitted accessory structures to the residential structure on site. The residential use is consistent with the Future .Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan, and the Future Land Cse Map. Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes that the proposed use for the subject site is consistent with the Future Land Use Element, although the variance request is not specifically addressed. Section 2.7.5 of the Land Development Code grants the authority to the Board of Zoning Appeals to grant variances. The Planning Coni nission I :. advisory to the BZrA and utilizes the provisions of Section 2.7.5.6.1 through 2.7.5.6. ,S, which are general guidelines to be used to assist the Commission in making a determination. Staff has analyzed this petition and offers the responses to the items in Section 2.7.5.6 as follows: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? No. There are no special conditions and circumstances that exist on this property. This lot meets the minimum lot area requirements 1t,, )00 square feet), and meets the minimum lot width requirements (60 feet). h. .=ire there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre - existing conditions relative to the property, which is the subject of the variance request? "o. The existing property owner constructed both the shed, on the north side of the property, and the pool and screen enclosure, on the south side of the property without a building permit. VA- 2003 -AR -4768 CCPC MEETING 12!18103 4 AGENDA I?EiOl,� S JAN 13 2004 Pg C. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code wort: unnecessary an undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? The literal interpretation of the setback requirement will create a practical difficulty for the applicant in that without the use of variance, it is likely a portion of the pool and enclosure, and the shed, will have to be physically removed in order to meet the setback requirement. The intent of a variance is to alleviate a hardship inherent in a piece of land. In this case, the applicant's hardship is a financial one that is self- imposed. The property owner and/or contractor failed to obtain the required building permits and consequently built structures that do not conform to the current setback requirements_ The financial hardship likely to be incurred by the applicant should the variance be denied is not a hardship that is inherent in the land therefore it does not meet the hardship criteria. The applicant mentions a personal hardship in that the pool provides an opportunity to obtain physical exercise to alleviate lower back pain. While it is unfortunate the petitioner suffers from lower back pain, personal hardships are not inherent in the land and cannot be considered to meet the hardship test as contemplated by the Land Development Code. d. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? Yes. The variance requested he minimum variance necessary to allow the existing strictures to remain in their present location. e. Will granting the variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district'? Yes. The allowance of the two structures to be outside the side building setback limits circumvents the minimum zoning setback regulations that are applicable to similar structures located in the same zoning district. The variance requested for the pool and screen enclosure represents nearly 100 percent of the required side yard setback. f. Will granting the variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? No. The intent of the Land Development Code to establish side yard setback regulations is to provide a minimum allowance for light and air between structures, as well as general fire separation between structures. The property abutting the subject property to the south is approximately fourteen feet from the pool and pool enclosure. While the fourteen -foot separation is a reasonable separation, it is entirely located upon the adjoining lot. If the property owner of Lot 37 exercises his right to construct a structure within the remaining buildable area of his property, the area between Lots 37 and 38 would be r a- feet. That limited separation would be a significant reduction to the light, a ankequired fire separation between the two properties. Conversely, the position c the existing stricture to the north, on the adjacent lot, is approximately t"venty -five feet ro111. ihJ�1004 VA- 2003 -AR -4768 CCPC MEETING 12/18/03 5 Pg. /p1 R This separation allows for more reasonable separation of light and air between the uses and does not encroach upon the required building separations to meet fire code. It is likely that the approval of the requested variances would not have a deleterious effect upon the neighborhood as a whole. The separation issues are related specifically to the adjoining lots g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? No. There are no natural conditions or physical induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objections of the LDC regulations. There is no required landscape buffer between lot lines in this zoning district. Building separation and buffering is achieved mainly through the use of setback requirements. h. Will granting the variance be consistent with. the Growth Management Plan? Approval of this variance petition will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth Management Plan. PAC RECGMNIENDATIGN: The Environmental Advisory Council does not normally hear variance petitions, and did not hear this variance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has analyzed the guidelines associated with the variance re ;.: °et, and 1,-�:; that there are no ameliorating factors that warrant approval of this petition. Both strictures were built without a buildi. , hermit, and both structures were placed outside of the building setback regulations. TI, achment of the pool and screen enclosure represents a substantial encroachment into the side yard requirement. The encroachment represents nearly 100 percent of the required side yard setback requirement and there are no land related hardships associated with this request. Staff recognizes the shed had existed for approximately 22 years with what appears to be no deleterious affect to the neighboring property owner. Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward to the Board of Zoning Appeals a recommendation of denial of Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4768. Should the Planning Commission choose to recommend approval of these variances, staff recommends an approval should be subject to the following conditions: 1. The variance is limited to 1.8 feet for the side yard setback for a shed on the property, and 7.3 feet for a pool and screen enclosure on the south side as depicted in the applicant's site plan, prepared by Mel Nathan, titled L VA- 2003 -AR -4768 CCPC MEETING 12/18/03 6 AGENDA ITEM en — tha dii��u4 X Pa. /3 Island, prepared March 4, 2003, and stamped received September 29, 2003, except as further restricted below. This site plan is included as Exhibit A; and 2. If the residential dwelling structure is destroyed for any reason, to an extent equal to or greater than 50 percent of the actual replacement cost of the structure at the time of its destruction, all reconstruction of the structure and accessory structures must conform to the provisions of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of reconstruction. !AN 13 2004 VA- 2003- ARA768 CCPC MEETING 12/18/03 7 PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: /, / z - s -o3 RAY LOWS, C I F PLANNER DATE DEPA R,IENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW -SUSAN MURRAY, AICP, INTERIM DIRtCTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: iJQSEPH K. SCHMITT, A15MINISTRATOR DATE YOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION f Z RUSSELL A. BUDD, CHAIRMAN DATE Tentatively scheduled for the December 18, 2003, Board of County Commissioners Meeting, Exhibits: 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Location Map Site Plan, entitled, Lot 38, Plantation Island, stamped received 9 /29/03 Doctor's Letter Neighbor's Letter Petition Letters Zoning Map Aerial Map AGMA ITtM N,--- -17 A JAN 13 2004 VA- 2003 -AR -4768 CCPC MEETING 12/18/03 8 1 PC. /,:�- � s X �- 1tIICHAEL Y. IZCJN Z, CFA, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE - - DEPARTMEXT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEWED BY: /, / z - s -o3 RAY LOWS, C I F PLANNER DATE DEPA R,IENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW -SUSAN MURRAY, AICP, INTERIM DIRtCTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: iJQSEPH K. SCHMITT, A15MINISTRATOR DATE YOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION f Z RUSSELL A. BUDD, CHAIRMAN DATE Tentatively scheduled for the December 18, 2003, Board of County Commissioners Meeting, Exhibits: 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Location Map Site Plan, entitled, Lot 38, Plantation Island, stamped received 9 /29/03 Doctor's Letter Neighbor's Letter Petition Letters Zoning Map Aerial Map AGMA ITtM N,--- -17 A JAN 13 2004 VA- 2003 -AR -4768 CCPC MEETING 12/18/03 8 1 PC. /,:�- N.wi.rs i >Cfi(. C `) ) 1 ! � 18' 1OU(i Albert Dowacter P.O. Box 342 Everglades City, Florida 34139 July 7, 2003 RE: Albert Dowacter MR #: 4211106 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that Mr. Dowacter is under my care for significant low back pain. In addition, he also suffers from osteoarthritis of the hip. It is imperative that lie continues his aquatic exercise program at home, indefinitely. in order to reduce his discomfort. I ask that he be allowed to keep his pool, as it is insti-tunental in his pain reduction. I thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Maurice R. Hanson, MD Department of Neurology MRH/hgw AGENDAIT NM= AN 13 2004 Pg. l EXHIBIT 3 -1-114:: i L, - V, -21 r11-L I L11-11 I I'll `I VCUnL7G I Mr. and Nfxs. Albert Dowacter Pon Office Box 342 Everglade City, Florida 34139 Re: Variances with Collier County ty Dear Mr. and Mrs. DowacW: "V�MQL"Litb AIRFARK As you know, I Own the adjac= Lot 39, which Is located just south OfYOUrpmperty acd is immediately adjacent to tau pool deck and scrftn patio. l understand youamWlyingf�ravariame with Collier County b=usa 0,0 pool deck is located .1fret ftln our mutual propm-ty lino, T.FurtheAr understand that you are Ming for a variance in cOanOction with a shed that is on the north side of your property which is located 5.7 feet from your northern propzrty IL-le. This letter is to acknowledge that, as your immediate adjacent property owm, I have i3c, objection to the variances that you are applying for and ask that the Collier C OunlY Plmming Board and thv Collier County Commi lion grant tl3o&c variances on your behalf, Date Sincerely yoursI, Bob Chipman PQ$b-tr FaA Note 7671 carw CID. Phone 0, PAGE J4" ( 1Y 1-4f A 4 AGENDA 1 2 N(x JAN 13 2004 , ;l Pg ------ L TOTAL F-01 EXHIBIT 4 PETITION The undersigned neighbors of Albert and Eleanor Dowacter, hereby understand that the Dowacters are applying to the Collier County Planning Board and the Collier County Commission in connection with seeking variances from their side setbacks for a pool deck and screen enclosure located on the south property line of Lot 38, Plantation Island as well as a shed located 5.7 feet from the north property line of the Dowacter's property at 3 8 Clary Road. The undersigned know that the pool is needed by Mr. Dowacter for medical reasons and that both the pool and the shed have been there for many years and feel that the variances should be granted to enable those structures to remain in their current locations. D umi ►i • _ .�. Ilk L./ Address lR:l.KNIMS 6 ice'- �l['!�•� ti x y All �( mo. SAN 1 ? 204 Pg.--Lg EXHIBIT 5 CEIIMIX Tim- untli- rs:g•red ne+ghlx>rs of Albert And Ek3nor Dowacter, he:ct x- utd:rstand th tt the, Do, acters are applying to ttrz CQWHu Plarul:ng Bcard and the Collier couur; CtInirnissicn in connec:iun win ►t ceekirg from their side setbacks for a pool Je: k an: scrvety enclosure 1., ate on the.�outh pro , rv. line of Lot A FiarMTion Island as utll as a :;, I i., ated ti.l fcct from the ror4h property line of the Dov.act.r'c on>perty at 3 S Cltin,Road. The tur:Ier »gnEd ;,�. t,iat the pool is needed by Mr. Dowactet f;:r medical masons a:,d that hoth the pool and the shed hz%,c btx.rt there fur many dears and fee that th; ':ariancrs 3113uld he granted to enable these structures to remain in the; :urrent lo;.atiory. Natttc Addresa , —� 7 - �L��tit rL- Q -� 1 _51 / �Qry CL_ f yf I" Z-1 t A lIN 1 ? 2004 Walter and Sheryl Rowland 108 Bordeaux Circle Naples, FL 34112 November 16, 2004 Dear Mr. DeRuntz: We are in receipt of your letter dated October 29, 2003 concerning Petition 4 VA -2003- AR -4768 as request by Mr. Albert Dowacter for a shed and pool variance. My wife and I have owned the property at 37/38 Flamingo Drive East on Plantation Island in close proximity to Mr. Dov icter for several years. We spend much time in the area and have seen the shed and pool in question. We would support adoption of the v,_iriance as requested as it appears that both the shed and pool have been constricted in a professional manner and certainly adds to property value in the community. It is also ()ur umderstanding that the pool is required for therapy by Mr. Dowacter. Thank you for taking the time to infOrm us of this petition. Sincerelv. - Walter M. R0\t1<,m(' AGEMA rrE� N% 17� AN 13 2004 Pg. Lp o EXHIBIT 6 November 21, 2003 RE: Petition #VA- 2003 -AR -4768 I have been a property owner on Plantation Island for approximately five years,, I reside at 9 Spoonbill Avenue. I have viewed the pool and shed in question many times by boat. I feel these structures are only a plus to the value and beautification of this property . Thank you for informing me of this petition. inda .Chinn f r-� C��J�t AGENDA ITEM Na I _--�- JAN 13 2004 Ps.__ `— I RESOLUTION NO. 04 — RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA- 2003 -AR- 4768, FOR AN 1.8 FOOT AFTER- THE -PACT VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED 7.5 FFET TO 5.7 FEET FOR THE EXISTING SHED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AND :1 7.3 FOOT AFTER- THE -FACT VARIANCE FROM THE SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 7.5 FEET TO 0.2 FEET FOR THE EXISTING POOL AND SCREEN ENCLOSURE ON "THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY IN THE AIH- ACSC;ST" MOBILE HOME ZONING DISTRICT WITH AN AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN,; SPECIAL TREATMENT ZONING OVERLAY. ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public. and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land De%elopment (_ode (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of,, ariances, and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning :Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 1.8 —foot after -the -tact variance from the I.DC Section 22.10.4.3.2 required side yard setback of 7 5 feet to 5.7 feet for the existing shed on the north side of the property and a 7.3 foot after- the -fact variance from the side yard requirement of 7.5 feet to 02 feet for the existing pool and screen enclosure on the south side of the property, as shown on the attached plot plan, E�,_n:va A , in an "1If I -ACSC S7 Mobile Home Zoning District with an Area of Critical State Concern,'Spccial Tie :uncut Zoning Overlay, for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY The Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that; The Petition VA -- 2003 -AR -4768 filed by Woodward, Piers and Lombardo. P. A., AGENQA ITEM representing Albert I. and Eleanor P. Dovyacter, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: JA'N 13 2004 VA-200;-AR-4 168 1 of 2 1 Pe. a Exhibit "A" be and the same hereby is approved for a 1.8 foot after- the -fact variance from the required side yard setback of 7.5 feet to 5.7 feet for the existing shed on the north side of the property and a 7.3 foot after- the -fact variance from the side yard setback requirement of 7.5 feet to 02 feet for the existing pool and screen enclosure on the south side of the property as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A ", of the " ,%IH- ACSG'ST" 'Mobile Home Zoning District with an Area of Critical State Concern/Special Treatment Zoning Overlay, wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: 1. The variance is for the encroachments shown in Exhibit "A" only. Any other encroachment shall require a separate variance; and _. In the case of the destruction of the encroaching structures, for any reason, to an extent equal to or greater than 50 percent of the actual replacement cost of the structure at the time of its destruction, all reconstntction of the accessory structures must contorm to the provisions of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of reconstruction. 3. A � isual barrier must be constructed inside the western side of the screen enclosure by the applicant within three months from the approval of this variance request; q. 1 lie applicant must apply for building permits for the shed. screen cnclosure, and pool within three months of the approval of this variance request. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number VA- _'UO' -AR -4768 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion. second and me Done this day of - . 2004. %I I ESI : BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Approved as to Form and Leal Sufficiency: Patrick %hite Assistant County Attorney 'ti ',- _G03-AR -4 ?68 to .A -. -AR -4768 2 of 2 AGENDA MEM JAN 13 20014 lt. 0?3 Q U) OV1 �wWQ E, W 0 M D _W F— O O U U J O W o: W j U O Z U H Z W 500.16' 11 "W 299.80' (0) 3„ l 1,91.00N —T _ (j) ,9 V09 3„ZS,C OON AGENDA ITEM N°-_.____1-- ---`:v CD JAN 13 200+1 Pl. a� 0 a� Qa F-1 co 0 a 0 0 0 C � VA- 2003 -AR -4768 PROJECT 42003070011 DATE: 9/29/03 0 MIKE DERUNTZ v J � z Ld w m W )- w Z O Z z% If LA- W m o0 W = Z Q w S00'32' 16"W 59.99'(F) , a. o 3 S00' 16-11 "W (D) V) 0U. z o Q m �z m 7 0 E 0 K c0i I ` •: GREiE• WAC . f "' �' •, PLANTER I LL- v W W .mil Q aD W � ~ � 1111 /1 ZQ ! W Z ^ _ a, o _ J ' o_ O _ [r J (o Z o 0 o 0 iU3 CC) w N o W a o ° V) o LL- 3 2 N � m o W � ° 0 I V) Z W O ~ L00 kD Z I (0) 3„ l 1,91.00N —T _ (j) ,9 V09 3„ZS,C OON AGENDA ITEM N°-_.____1-- ---`:v CD JAN 13 200+1 Pl. a� 0 a� Qa F-1 co 0 a 0 0 0 C � EXECUTIVE SUNINIARY CU- 2003 -AR -4524, JAMES B. NIALLESS AICP, OF WIRELESS PLANNING SERVICES, LLC REPRESENTING PINNACLE TOWERS, INC., REQUESTS CONDITIONAL USE #13 OF THE "A" RURAL AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PURPOSE OF A 700 -FOOT GUYED COMMUNICATIONS TOWER PER SECTION 2.6.35 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE PROPERTY TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE CONDITIONAL USE IS LOCATED, IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 5t SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA. THIS PROPERTY CONSISTS OF 14.55+ ACRES. OBJECTIVE: Staff is requesting that the Board of Zoning Appeals review staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the CCPC regarding the above referenced Conditional Use petition and render a decision regarding the petition. CONSIDERATIONS: This petition was heard at the December 2 x`)03 Board of County Commissioners scheduled public hearing. The petition and its companio. tem were continued to the January 13, 2004, BCC scheduled public hearing by the motion of Commissioner Fiala, and seconded by Commissioner Halas. The petition was continued to acv ant the final determination of height for the tower by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) before a final decision is reached by the Board of Zoning Appeals. The FAA final determination of height was provided to the County from the applicant on December 16, 2003. The FAA determined the maximum hcight for the tower to be 527 feet to ensure the Structure would have no adverse effect on navigable airspace. A copy of this determination is attached to this executive summary. The Petitioner requests approval of Conditional Use "13" of the Rural Agricultural "A" zoning district for a 700 -foot guyed comnninications tower per Section 2.6.35 of the Collier County Land Development Code on 14.55± acres. The Conditional Use application is a companion item to three dimensional variance requests contained within VA- 2003 -AR -4525. The proposed tower will sit on a parcel of land currently developed with a 524 -foot guyed -wired telecommunications tower. The location of the subject site is 305 Tower Road, which is 1/4 mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR 95 1) and l mile south of East Tamiami Trail (US 41). The tower is being constructed for the United States Coast Guard, a division of the Homeland Defense Department, to bolster the Rescue 21 advanced search and rescue communications system and the Homeland Defense program. Information concerning the Coast Guard's Rescue 21 communication system is included within the package attached to this executive summary. Executive Summary /CU- 2003 -AR -4524 Page 1 of 5 )AID 1 3' 2M Pg. l The subject property has been the location of a broadcast tower since 1971. At that time a 700 -foot tower was constructed. The existing tower has been subsequently lowered through SIP -00 -AR -1054 to its present height of 524 -feet. The residential development that currently exists adjacent to the tower site was developed with the tower at its present location. The addition of a second tower at the site will present a visual intrusion, but to an environment that is currently impacted by a tower. The location choice, resulting in multiple towers at one location, is promoted within Section 2.6.35 of the LDC, which encourages towers to share the same parent parcel. The size of the parent parcel, with the existing buffers and vegetation, will effectively screen the base of the tower and the accessory buildings from the surrounding properties. This request is consistent with the Growth Management Plan, and with the conditions proposed by staff, this project will be in compliance with the LDC. The motivating factor for the construction of this tower is its need by the United States Coast Guard for their Rescue 21 Project. This project will be utilized to enhance the rescue capabilities of the Coast Guard and to bolster their Homeland Defense capabilities. Both of these programs are centered upon health, safety and welfare, the very underlining principals of zoning regulations. Due to this essential nexus, the proposed project can be found to be consistent with the LDC and the G%/IP. At the time this executive summary was generated, staff had received one letter of objection to the proposed tower. At the required Neighborhood Information Meeting. a representative of the Eagle Creek Home Owners Association indicated that the Association had no objection to the tower and there were no speakers in oppo�iiion at the Collier County Planning Commission held October 16, 2003. The County has received a copy of the letter of objection to the proposed tower, sent from.the Florida Department of Transportation, to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) — Southern Region Office. In summary, the letter objects to the tower stating that the proposed tower in combination with the existing tower would create a possible aviation hazard. The determination of the impact the proposed tower will have to the aviation safety of the area is solely determined by the FAA, and the FAA will account for the objection when reaching its final decision on the ultimate height of the tower. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this petition will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of this conditional use will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth Management Plan. Executive Summary /CU- 2003 -AR -4524 Page 2 of 5 AGMA ITEM JAN 13 2004 ENVIRONNIENTAL ISSUES: The environmental staff's analysis indicates that there are no environmental issues associated with the project. A copy of the application has been made available to the Rookery Bay Estuary and at the time this executive summary was written, no opposition has been expressed by the agency. HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: Staff s analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is not located within an Area of Historical and Archaeological Probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no survey or waiver of Historic and Archaeological Survey & Assessment is required. ENVIRONMFNTAI ADVISORY COUNCIL (F AC) RECONINIENDATION: The Environmental Advisory Council did not review this petition based upon the application not requirinz an Environmental Impact statement (EIS). COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING CONINIISSION (CCP(') RECONINIENDA'I'ION: This petition was heard at the October Lb, 2003, CCPC meeting. The Commission motioned to forward petition CIT- 2003 -AR -4524 with a recommendation of APPROVAL. S1113JECT TO MODIFICATIONS OF THE CONDITIONS ATTACHED TO "11IE RESOLUTION The motion passed UNANI_MOUSLY by a vote of eight to zero. The modification to the conditions of approval was contained in Condition `4 The Planning Commission added the language, "above the height of 250 feet ", to Condition "4" as proposed by Staff. STAFF RECONINIENDATION: Staff feels that the functionality of Health, Safety and Welfare provided from the proposed tower, coupled with the limited puhlic opposition ,in.d existiw, -i?44not tmver nn IN- <iihiect parcel justifies the granting of the conditional use. Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission recommend approval of Petition CU- 2003 -AR -4524 to the Board of Zoning Appcais, subject to the following conditions: The Director of the Department of Zoning and Land Development Review may approve minor changes in the location, sitting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the Conditional Use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this Conditional Use application, or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new Conditional Use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and Approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance (91 -102). Executive Summary /CU- 2003 -AR -4524 Page 3 of 5 mo. V_ JAN 13 2001 Pg. 13 2. Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if, during the course of site clearing, excavation, or other construction related activity, a historic or archeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped, and the Collier County Code Enforcement Director shall be contacted. 3. Pinnacle Tower Inc. or the current tower owner shall submit a monitoring report, every three years from the date of Board of County Commissioners approval, inventorying the users located on the tower. 4. If the tower is no longer used by a governmental agency, above the height of 250 feet, then this conditional use shall expire and the tower shall be reduced to conform to the permitted height designated within the Rural Agricultural Zoning District. Executive Summary /CU- 2003 -AR -4524 Page 4 of 5 AGEMA ITEM , JAN 13 2004 pu•--� PREPARED BY: MIKE BOSI, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE DEPARTMENT OF "ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEWED BY: I '/? L=-- - /Z-& —O RAY I LLOWS. CHIEF PLANNER DATE DEPARTMENT OF "ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SUSAN MI RRAY. AICP, INTERIM DI4ECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: JOSLIPH K. SCHMITT DATE C:O;VIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL StkVICES ADMINISTRATOR Executive Summary/CU- 2003 -AR -4524 Page 5 of 5 AGENDA ITEM;� JAN 13 2004 Pa. AGENDA ITEM 8 -13 `oa,a MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNT`- PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION DATE: September 18, 2003 SUBJECT: CU- 2003 -AR -4524 — Companion to VA- 2003 -AR -4525 PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: OWNER: Pinnacle Towers Inc. 301 North Cattleman Road Sarasota, FL 34232 AGENT: James B. Malless, AICP Firm Wireless Planning Services, LLC 845 Mississippi Avenue Lakeland, FL 33801 REQUESTED ACTION: The Petitioner requests approval of Conditional Use "13" of the Rural Agricultural "A" zoning district for a 700 -foot guyed communications tower per Section 2.6.35 of the Collier County Land Development Code on 1='.55± acres. The Conditional Use application is a companion item to three dimensional variance requests contained within VA- 2003 -AR -4525. LOCATION: The subject property is located at 305 Tower Road, in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 14.55± acres. CU- 2003 -AR -4524 October 16, 2003 CCPC Page 1 of 9 AGENDA ITEM 2 No. 7 (� JAN 13 2004 Pg. 6 • • LOCATION MAP DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Y I I I� /, .oc.r N - SITE LOCATION LOCATION MAP DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Y FE'IT!�y pCJ - Z�C3 AR- 4524 SITE MAP The petitioner seeks a Conditional Use for a 700 -foot telecommunications tower on 14.55+ acres of land. The proposed tower will sit on a parcel of land currently developed with a 524 -foot guyed -wired telecommunications tower. The location of the subject site is 305 Tower Road, which is t/4 mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and 1 mile south of East Tamiami Trail (US 41). The tower is being constructed for the United States Coast Guard, a division of the Homeland Defense Department, to bolster the Rescue 21 advanced search and rescue communications system and the Homeland Defense program. Information concerning the Coast Guard's Rescue 21 communication system is included within the package attached to this staff report. The Conditional Use application is required due to the height of the tower request. Section 2.6.35 of the Collier County LDC dictates that towers up to 250 -feet in height are permitted uses within the Rural Agricultural zoning district. Towers above the specified height are permitted on a conditional basis as specified by Section 2.2.2.3 of the LDC. The parcel is located wholly within the "A" Rural Agricultural zoning district. • I AGENDA ITS' CU- 2003 -AR -4524 October 16, 2003 CCPC Page 2 of 9 ?AN 13 2004 Pg. I I I� /, r� SITE LOCATION � I FE'IT!�y pCJ - Z�C3 AR- 4524 SITE MAP The petitioner seeks a Conditional Use for a 700 -foot telecommunications tower on 14.55+ acres of land. The proposed tower will sit on a parcel of land currently developed with a 524 -foot guyed -wired telecommunications tower. The location of the subject site is 305 Tower Road, which is t/4 mile west of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and 1 mile south of East Tamiami Trail (US 41). The tower is being constructed for the United States Coast Guard, a division of the Homeland Defense Department, to bolster the Rescue 21 advanced search and rescue communications system and the Homeland Defense program. Information concerning the Coast Guard's Rescue 21 communication system is included within the package attached to this staff report. The Conditional Use application is required due to the height of the tower request. Section 2.6.35 of the Collier County LDC dictates that towers up to 250 -feet in height are permitted uses within the Rural Agricultural zoning district. Towers above the specified height are permitted on a conditional basis as specified by Section 2.2.2.3 of the LDC. The parcel is located wholly within the "A" Rural Agricultural zoning district. • I AGENDA ITS' CU- 2003 -AR -4524 October 16, 2003 CCPC Page 2 of 9 ?AN 13 2004 Pg. I -1 AN Mumma, 'n LES FL GUYED TOWER 01,7 -004 s ro«Ert naw A -1 2.2.2.3. Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the rural agricultural district (A). subiect to the standards and procedures established in division 2.7.4. 13. Communication towers above specified height, subject to section 2.6.35. Per LDC Section 2.6.35, the development of a telecommunications tower which requires the use of a conditional use or variance needs to comply with additional requirements. This Conditional Use application is accompanied by petition VA- 2003 -AR -4525, and thus required to satisfy these addition requirements as stated by code. 2.6.35.6.26. Additional findings for variance and conditional use applications. In addition to the findings for conditional use applications and variance applications as required in sections 2.7.4 and 2.7.5 respectively of this Code, the following additional findings shall be made by the Collier County Planning Commission when considering such applications: Mo- o -1 6 CU- 2003 -AR -4524 October 16, 2003 CCPC Page 3 of 9 JAN 13 2004 Pg. 2 1. The applicant must demonstrate that the telecommunications tower /antenna must be located where it is to serve the company's system and service area and that sharing capacity is unfeasible or unreasonable as to existing towers. Evidence must be provided which considers the following: a. Proximity of all nearby towers located within the effective radius and whether or not they provide sharing of facilities. b. If true, existing telecommunications towers and structures located within the effective radius are not of sufficient height for the proposed tower's service area. Such evidence must be certified by an appropriate professional engineer certified to practice in the State of Florida. c. Existing towers and structures located within the effective radius are not of sufficient structural strength to support the applicant's proposed antennas and related equipment. Such evidence must be certified by an appropriate professional engineer certified to practice in the State of Florida. d. Sharing would cause electromagnetic interference with either the applicant's communication system or with existing communication systems. Such evidence must be certified by an appropriate professional engineer certified to practice in the State of Florida. e. Costs to share an existing tower or structure or to adapt an existing tower or structure for sharing are unreasonable. Fees and costs which exceed the costs to design and construct a new telecommunications tower shall be presumed to be unreasonable. f. applicable, other limiting factors, including but not limited to natural and manmade environmental limitations. 2. Required certification. The applicant shall provide certification by a professional engineer that the proposed telecommunications tower or alternative tower structure is designed in accordance with • the standards specified in this article and those incorporated by reference into this article, and that in case of collapse the telecommunications tower or alternative tower structure will be contained on the parcel or site, and that no structure other than those in direct support to the operations of the telecommunications tower or alternative tower structure shall be located within the fall zone. 0 3. Compliance with aviation regulations. The applicant must demonstrate that the proposed tower complies with all state and federal laws and regulations concerning aviation safety, including part 77 of the federal aviation regulations and part 17 of the FCC regulations, and if planned to exceed 150 feet in height above grade, has been submitted for review by the Collier County Mosquito Control District. 4. Evidence of pursuing use of existing towers anu tower sites. The applicant must provide evidence of pursuing the use of existing towers, structures, and facilities within the effective radius as specified in section 2.6.35.2. Evidence shall include written correspondence between the applicant and owner /operator of other structures in the effective radius including a request for space, the applicable rate structure for leasing, the applicable radio frequency, structural requirements, and any existing FCC limitations and other information as required in section 2.6.35.3. of this Code. 5. Comparison of proposed site versus use of existing sites within effective radius. The applicant will provide a map of the proposed coverage area and a propagation study for the proposed telecommunications tower and any existing or proposed towers and structures within the effective radius, which may be used to facilitate the applicant's antenna(s) and equipment, including the input data for those maps for comparison of both proposed and existing towers, and any other technical parameter used; analyses which include the type of equipment to be used and the structural loading criteria used, and which address alternative scenarios, such as using an existing tower or placing a tower elsewhere versus using the proposed tower and site. 6. The above requirements may be waived by staff if the applicant presents good cause proving why the respective requirement is not applicable or such proof is irrelevant or sup specific application. AGENDAA/ITEM� P!O•,�__1__� CU- 2003 -AR -4524 October 16, 2003 CCPC Page 4 of 9 JAN 13 2004 Pg. q �I Staff has reviewed the application, which is attached to this staff report, and believes the applicant has satisfactorily addressed each of these issues. The petition was also forwarded to Rookery Bay and the Collier County Mosquito Control District for review and comment, and neither agency has expressed opposition to the project. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT: SURROUNDING: North: East: South: West: Existing 524 -foot tower, zoned A Golf Course and Residential Structures, zoned PUD -Eagle Creek Cox Cable Complex, zoned A Undeveloped tract, zoned A Golf Course, zoned PUD -Eagle Creek GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed this request and offered the following comments: The subject property is designated Urban (Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict), as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. Relevant to this petition, this Subdistrict permits communication facilities. FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with the surrounding area. Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to Current Planning staff as part of their review of the petition in its totality. CU- 2003 -AR -4524 October 16, 2003 CCPC Page 5 of 9 JAN 13 2004 Pg. t 0 • Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes that the proposed land use for this subject site can be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. The other applicable element of the G IIP for which a consistency review was made is the Transportation Element. Ingress and egress to the site will be provided through Tower Road with access to the site via a gravel and broken pavement drive that is 12 -feet wide. The number of vehicle trips generated by the use will be limited to monthly maintenance inspections. Based on this data, the site - generated traffic will not exceed the significance test standard (5 percent of the level of service LOS "C" design volume) on any County road. In addition, the site - generated trips will not lower the LOS below the adopted LOS "D" standard for any segment within the project's radius of development influence (RDI). Therefore, this project is consistent with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Transportation Element (TE). HISTORIC /ARCH '.EOLOGICAL IMPACT: Staff analysis indicates that the petitioner's property in located outside an area of historical and archaeological probability, as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no Historical /Archaeological Survey and Assessment is required. TRANSPORTATION, INFRASTRUCTURE & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: The oposed impact of the proposed tower on transportation, infrastructure, and the environment was reviewed by the applicable reviewing agencies and their comments and conditions have been incorporated into this staff report. STAFF ANALYSIS: Before any Conditional Use recommendation can be offered to the Board of Zoning Appeals, the Planning Commission must make findings that: 1) approval of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest; and 2) all specific t ;qU C1r1ents ion tlic 1r�Uividual Conditional UsP will be met; and 3) satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following matte. - -h -re applicable: 1. Consistency with the Land Development Code and the Growth Management Plan. As previously noted, this request is consistent with the Growth Management Plan, and with the conditions proposed by staff, this project will be in compliance with the LDC. The motivating factor for the construction of this tower is its need by the United States Coast Guard for their Rescue 21 Project. This project will be utilized to enhance the rescue capabilities of the Coast Guard and to bolster their Homeland Defense capabilities. Both of these programs are centered upon health, safety and welfare, the very underlining principals of zoning regulations. Due to this essential nexus, the proposed project can be found to be consistent with the LDC and the GMP. AGENDA ITEM CU- 2003 -AR -4524 October 16, 2003 CCPC Page 6 of 9 JAN 13 2004 Pg.—il- --1 -,V 2. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic now and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Ingress and egress to the site will be provided through Tower Road with access to the site via a gravel and broken pavement drive that is 12 feet wide. The access drive off Tower Road is a private driveway maintained by the applicant. Collier Boulevard is approximately 2,000 feet to the east of the access point on Tower Road. Access to the site is controlled by a locked gate that is set back from Tower Road to allow trucks to pull off the road and not impede traffic on Tower Road. Emergency Services have been provided keys to access the site. 3. The effect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. This proposed tower should have minimal impact on neighboring properties at the present time due to the existing tower on the property. The proposed tower will not create any additional glare or odor from the site and the only additional noise would be from the air conditioner associated with the accessory building. The noise generated will be mitigated due to the size of the parcel and the distance from the base of the tower to the neighboring property lines. The proposed tower is not expected to have a negative impact on the economic value of the neighboring properties. 'These properties were developed in the presence of the existing tower and any negative impact would have most likely prevented the surrounding properties from such a land use location choice. 4. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. The subject property has been the location of a broadcast tower since 1971. At that time a 700 -foot tower was constructed. The existing tower has been subsequently lowered through SIP -00 -AR -1054 to its present height of 524 -feet. The residential development that currently exists adjacent to the tower site was developed with the tower at its present location. The addition of a second tower at the site will present a visual intrusion, but to an environment that is currently impacted by a tower. The location choice, resulting in multiple towers at one location, is promoted within Section 2.6.35 of the LDC, which encourages towers to share the same parent parcel. The size of the parent parcel, with the existing buffers and vegetation, will effectively screen the base of the tower and the accessory buildings from the surrounding properties. CONDITION DISCUSSION: Staff has recommended conditions to be attached to any approval for this petition. The conditions are addressed below: Condition #1 allows staff limited discretion to recognize and provide administrative relief for minor differences in site design, while prohibiting any intensification of the us CU- 2003 -AR -4524 October 16, 2003 CCPC Page 7 of 9 ' t JAN 13 2004 requires preservation of any historic or archaeological artifacts that may be found during the excavation. Condition 43 provides the county with a tri- annual monitoring report to assure the tower is conveying the health, safety and welfare service utilized by the application to provide justification for granting approval of the original conditional use. Condition 44 establishes the time frame for the Conditional Use to the function of providing a health, safety and welfare service to the community. PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOININI IENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission recommend approval of Petition CU-2003-AR-4524 to the Board of Zoning Appeals, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Current Planning Manager may approve minor changes in the location, sitting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the Conditional Use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this Conditional Use application, or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new Conditional Use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and Approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance (91 -102). 2. Pursuant to Section .25.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if, during the course of site clearing, excavation, or other construction related activity, a historic or archeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped, and the Collier County Code Enforcement Director shall be contacted. 3. Pinnacle Tower Inc. or the current tower owner shall submit a monitoring report, every three years from the date of Board of County Commissioners approval, inventorying the user located on the tower. 4. If the tower is no longer used by a governmental agency providing for the health, safety and welfare of the community, then this Conditional Use shall expire and the tower's height will be reduced to conform to the permitted height designated within the Rural Agricultural zoning district. rAGEINDA ITEM 1 3 2004 CU- 2003 -AR -4524 October 16, 2003 CCPC Page 8 of 9 L PREPARED BY: MIKE BOSI, AICP PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEWED BY: USAN MURRAY, AICP CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER APPROVED BY: 13 -as —y 3 DATE '7-30 -a 3 DATE /t7 -zi Q3 'JO JO K. S HMITT, AD INISTRATOR DATE C MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION Collier County Planning Commission: RUSSELL A. BUDD, CHAIRMAN /� /� 0 DAT Staff report for the October 16, 2003 Collier County Planning Conunission Meeting Tentatively scheduled for the November 18, 2003 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Attachments: A. Findings of Fact B. Conceptual Master Plan C. Proposed Conditions CU- 2003 -AR -4524 October 16, 2003 CCPC Page 9 of 9 F!o. 4:�6- JAIN 13 2004 pg'— � 4. 9 C 1 VA- CL LU U) Q N Q� o! NI L) x Z O H w w a Q Z O F- Q U O J !AN 13 2004 Pg. r APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: CONDITIONAL USE Petition No.: Commission District: 1. General Information Date Petition Received Planner Assigned CU-2003--AR-4524 PROJECT #2003060041 DATE: 7/31/03 MIKE BOSI COMPANION ITEM TO VA- 2003 -AR -4525 ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF Name of Applicant(s) Pinnacle Towers Inc. CIO Bonnie Bowers Applicant's N\Ituling Address 301 N. Cattleman Road, City Sarasota State Florida Zip 34232 Applicant's Telephone # 941 -308 -5215 Fax # 941 -364 -8761 Applicant's E -Mail Address: bbowers@pintowers.com Name of Agent James B. Malless, AICP Finn Wireless Planning Services, LLC Agent's Mailing Address 845 Mississippi Ave City Lakeland State FL Zip33801 Agent's Telephone # 863- 838 -9686 Fax # 863- 688 -5176 Agent's E -Mail Address: Jim 9scrproperties.corn * Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE - 4/14/03 AGENDA ITEM n JAN 13 2004 r Pg. 14 COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SERVICES /CURRENT PLANNING 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE - NAPLES, FL 34104 PHONE (941) 403 - 2400 /FAX (941) 643 -6968 Complete the following for all Association(s) affiliated with this petition. (Provide additional sheets if necessary) Name of Homeowner Association: N/A Mailing Address City State Zip_ Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address City State Zip_ Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address Name of N-laster Association Mailing Address Name of Civic Association Mailing A( -- N/A N/A City Stare Zip City State Zip City State Zip 2 . Disclosure of Interest Information: a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of 0%vnership N/A - AGENDA ITEM n lA N 13 2004 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE - 4/14/03 r c d If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name, Address and Office David Grain, President William Freeman, CFO W. Scot Lloyd, Exec. VP Evan Berlin, VP Tom Guard, Treasurer Camille Blornmer, Controller Keith Drucker, VP Percentage of Stock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 All at 301 N. Cattleman Road, Suite 300 Sarasota, FI 34232 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest N/A If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LPVIITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and /or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership N!A If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the ,ockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership N/A Date of Contract: APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE 4/14/03 Z= JAN 13 2004 Pg.--Z _9 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address N/A g. Date subject property acquired June 16, 1997 If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: _N /A and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 3. Detailed legal description of the _property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months. maximum I" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre - application meeting. NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section: 3 Township: 51 Range:26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book Page #: Property I.D. 4:512603 006.0016BO3/ 00724400009 Metes & Bounds Description: ATTACHED 4 . Size of property: 800 ft. X 891 ft. = Total Sq. Ft. 633,798 Acres 14.55 5. Address /general location of subject property: 305 Tower Road, Naples north west of the intersection of US 41 and SR 951 JAN 13 2004 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE — 4/14/03 1 ! l 6 . Adiacent zoning and land use: Zoning Land use N PUD Residential and golf course S C -3 & A Warehouse and Vacant E PU" I" Office W PUD Residential and golf course Does property owner own contiguous property to the subject property? If so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page). NO Section: NA Township: _ Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book Page #: Property I.D. #: Metes & Bounds Description: 7. Type of Conditional Use: This application is requesting conditional use # 2.6.35.6.2 of the _A_ district for (TYPE OF -700) f+ guyed tower I Present Use of the Property: Existing 524 foot guyed tower and associated structures 8. Evaluation Criteria: Provide a narrative statement describing this request for conditional use. NOTE: Pursuant to Section 2.7.4. of the Collier County Land Development Code, staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be based upon a finding that the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and that the specific requirements governing the individual conditional use, if any, have been met, and that further, satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable. Please provide detailed response to each oft the criterion listed below. Specify how and why the request is consistei t widpQfi 4�T� (Attach additional pages as may be necessary). mo. ''J APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEAR[NG FOR CONDITIONAL [;SE - 4/14/03 JAN 13 2004 �. ao a. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan (include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section or portions of the future land use element): RESPONSE This request is made to provide a 700 -foot tower for the US Coast Guard to use for it's communications. This is a safety issue that the Coast Guard has access to proper communication systems. These types of facilities are allowed in the land use to recognize that this is an appropriate location for a tower of this size. b . Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and proposed structure thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: RESPONSE The site is served by Tower Road with access to the site via a gravel and broken pavement drive that is 12 feet wide. Access to the site is controlled by a locked gate that is off the pavement a distance to allow trucks to pull off of the road and not block traffic on Tower Road. c. Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic impact and odor: RESPONSE The proposed tower and facilities will not create any glare or odor, and the only noise will be the air conditioner on the buildings. The noise from the air conditioner is no different than an air conditioner on a residence. The proposed tower and facilities will not have an economic impact on neighboring properties, because the existing tower was originally 700 -feet tall. The height was reduced to 52.1 feet in June, 2000. The site has been a tower site for many years. The adjacent development has occurred after the original tower was built. d. Describe the site's and the proposed uses compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties in the district: RESPr"?c" 11,;s site has been a broadcast tower site with a 700 -foot tower and accessory uses for years. The area developed with offices, a golf course and houses with the existing tower. The AR zoning on the 14.55 acre site is an allowed use with a Conditional Use Permit. The existing natural buffering hides the accessory structures at the base of the tower. e . Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request. This facility will provide a location for antennas for the US Coast Guard Rescue 21. This project is fully described in the enclosed materials. The project requires the location of antennas at sufficient height to allow contmous coverage along the coast of Florida. This is an excellent location to provide coverage for the Naples /Collier County shores and minimizes the number of towers required to the the area. The location is excellent because it meets the intent Section 2.6.35 of the Communiaction Tower section by clustering towers in one parcel to mini H mAttt)k ITEM impacts of the facility. V!0.��✓ JAN 13 2004 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE- 4/14/03 1 g l �r 9. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 10. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last: year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? N/A 11. Additional Submittal requirements: In addition to this completed application, the following must be submitted in order for your application to be deemed sufficient, unless otherwise waived during the preapplication meeting. a . A copy of the pre - application meeting notes; b. Twenty (20) copies of a 24" x 36" conceptual site plan [and one reduced 8'/" x 1 l copy of site plan], drawn to a maximum scale of 1 inch equals 400 feet, depicting the following [Additional copies of the plan may be requested upon completion of staff evaluation for distribution to the Board and various advisory boards such as the Environmental Advisory Board (EAB), or CCPC]; • all existing and proposed structures and the dimensions thereof, • provisions for existing and /or proposed ingress and egress (including pedestrian ingress and egress to the site and the structure(s) on site} • all existing and /or proposed parking and loading areas [include matrix indicating required and provided parking and loading, including required parking for the disabled], • locations of solid waste (refuse) containers and service function areas, • required yards, open space and preserve areas, • proposed locations for utilities (as well as location of existing utility services to the site), • proposed and /or existing landscaping and buffering as may be required by the County, • location of all signs and lighting including a narrative statement as to the type, character, and dimensions (such as height, area, etc.); C . An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as required by Section 3.8. Development Code (LDC). APPLICATION FOR PUBIjC HFARINC FOR CONDITIONAL USE - 4114/03 f � j`j"� jAN 13 '2004 Pg. C111 d . Whether or not an EIS is required, two copies of a recent aerial photograph, (taken within the previous twelve months), minimum scale of one inch equals 400 feet, shall be submitted. Said aerial shall identify plant and/or wildlife habitats and their boundaries. Such identification shall be consistent with Florida Department of Transportation Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System. e . Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments and sketches); f . A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS), unless waived at the pre - application meeting; g . A historical and archeological survey or waiver application if property is located within an area of historical or archaeological probability (as identified at pre - application meeting); h. Any additional requirements as may be applicable to specific conditional uses and identified during the pre- application meeting, including but not limited to any required state or fedc.al permits. Be advised that Section 2.7.2.3.2 (3) of the Land Development Code requires an applicant to remove their public hearing sign (s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. AGENDA ITEM No' JAN 13 2004 .APPLICATION FOR PI-131-IC BEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE-4114103 11 P9 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of real property conveyed by Warranty Deed from Palmer Communications, Inc. to Pinnacle Towers, Inc. ISLE OF CAPRI Legal Description of site: A tract of land in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being all of certain tracts described in Official Records Book 165, Pages 54 and 56 of the deed records of said Collier County, Florida. Said tract of land being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwest comer of said Section 3; thence along the West line of said Section 3 North 00000'15" West, 920.69 feet to a concrete monument found at the Northwest corner of a certain tract of land described as "General TV Tract" in said Official Records Book 165, Paoe 5=I; thence along the Northerly line of said "General TV Tract" and parallel with the South line of said Section 3, South 89 °52'30" East, 799.84 feet to a concrete monument found for the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along the Easterly line of the land described in said Official Records Book 165, Pages 54 and 56, South 00 °00' 15" East, 604.76 feet to an iron pin set in the Northerly right- of -way line of _. Tower Road for the Southeast corner of tract herein described; thence along said Northerly right -of -way line, the following Five (5) courses: (1) South 75 °26'40" West, 21.01 feet to an iron pin set; (2) alone a curve, concave to the Southeast whose elements are: central angle of 59 °20'09 ", radius of 105.00 feet, arc length of 108.74 feet and a chord that bears South 45 °44'36" West, 103.94 feet to an iron pin set; (3) South 16 °04'49" West, 183.34 feet to an iron pin set; (4) along a curve, concave to the Northwest, whose elements area central angle of 74 °04'31 ", radius of 45.00 feet, arc length of 58.18 feet and a chord that bears South 53 °10'20" West, 54.21 feet to an iron pin set; (5) North 89'48'15" Wept. 341.90 feet to a concrete monument found at the Southwest corner of a certain Parcel "A" described in said Official Records Book 165, Page 55; thence along the �'. c ;c;;, ji:M; of said Parcel "A ", North 00 °03'32" Nest, 178.61 feet to an iron pin set at the Northwest corner of said Parcel "A ", being also in the Southerly line of said "General TV Tract "; thence along said Southerly line North 89 °47'21" West 268.79 feet to a concrete monument found at the Southwest corner of said "General TV Tract ", also being in the West line of said Section 3, being also the Southwest corner of said tract hcrcir �l::scribed; thence along said Section line, being also the Westerly line of said "General "1'V Tract ", North 00'00'15" West, 712.23 feet to a concrete monument found at the Northwest corner of said "General TV Tract ", being also the Northwest corner of the tract herein described; thence along the Northerly line of said "General TV Tract" and parallel With the South line of said Section 3, South 89 °52'30" East, 799.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. AGENDA ITEM .JAN 13 20004 pg.__ a1 - CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PAC'KFTI REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED 1. Completed Application 20* 2. Copy of Deed(s) and list identifying Owner(s) and all Partners if a Corporation 2* 3. Completed Owner /Agent Affidavits, Notarized 2* 4. Pre - application notes /minutes 20* =� 5. Conceptual Site Plans (including (1) 8 -1/2 X 11 copy) 20* 6. Environmental Impact Statement - (EIS) 4 �f 7. Aerial Photograph - (with habitat areas identified) S* c 8. Completed Utility Provisions Statement (with required attachments and sketches) 4 9. Traffic Impact Statement - (TIS) 7 I 10. Historical & Archaeological Survey or Waiver Application 4 (� 11. Copies of State and /or Federal Permits 4 r/ 12. Archite . ral Rendering of Proposed Structure(s) 13. Application Fee = $2000 Data Conversion Fee = S25 Fire Code Review Fee = $150 Check shall be made payable to: Collier County Board of Commissioners 4 - 14. Other Requirements - * Documents required for Long -Range Planning Review As the authorized agent applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing of this petition. Applicant /Agent Signature rz:- /, Date AGENDA� JAN 13 2004 1?6"- APPLICATION' FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE - 4/14/03 pg. 0 OS/22/2003 15:26 659572,' ADDPESSING PAGE 01 Jun 17 2003 2:00Pr1 _ nmorns 6 Company 863 J1603 P.3 ADDRIEBBIN3 CXMCKL19T Please complete the following U d submit to the Addreeeing Section for Review Net, all items will ADDIy to every rroieet. Items In bold type are reguire j. 1. Legltt description of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be arrached) f !:. n 3 v • 2. Folio (Property ID) numbers) pf above (attach to, or associate wick legal e9crtption (f more than one) 00 24�leOCOU CL(5� i,St�'rl c In1c.�1. c ' 3. Street address or e►ddresaoa it applicable, lfalroody assigned) L o_ 4. Location map, showing exaot location of projoct/sitc in relation to nce.rest public road right -of -way (attach) S. Copy of survey (NE.BDED ONLY FOR UNPLATTED PROPERTM S) 6, Proposed reject name (tfapplicable) 7. Propose Street names 8. Site Development Plat, Numbtar (FOR B)aSTIN f} PROJECTS /SI'D`ES ONLY) 5DP _ 9. Petition Type — (Cornplcto a separate Addresging Cbeeklist fbr each Petition Type) D SDP (Site DcvcLopment Plan) 0 PPL (Plana & Plat Review) D SDPA (SDP Amendment) D PSP (Preliminary D SI)PI (SDP Insubstantial Ch Subdivision Plat) D SIP (site Improvement plan) �) O PP (Final Plat) 0 SIPA (SIP A.mendrncnt) I-L 113t Lino Adjustment) ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) HI. (Bln�ting Permit) ❑�VegetationBxotie 8 ❑ ROW (Right -of -Way Permit) ((�� (Ve Removal Permits) p g}{p (Excavation Permit) Land Use Petition (Variance, Conditional Use, O VRSFP (Vet;, Removal & Si*c Fill Permit) Boat Dock Ext., Rozonc, PUD rezone, etc) Q Other - Deocribe: !0. Projector devclopment names proposed for, or already appcoring in, condominium docurnento (if applicable; iadlcate whether propoaed or existing) 11. Please C6eak pee 12 vt aklist is to bo �Faxed Bade D Pet•sonally Picked Up a . App�eaxt Name 1 Phone 3. Signature oa Addressing Checklist d�oea not con9titute Project and/or Stree �J �- a�"�y � �c�� /�. cr mac' b the Addressing Section, t Name aPProval and is subject to FOR 5 I-A FF I pla y Primary Number Address Numbar Address Number Address Number RECEIVED ApProvod by .6j. Date r, - ! $ -03 �M JAN 13 2004 P9. a4 CONDITIONAL USE PETITION PRE— APPLICATION MEETING NOTES & SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Date: t,- a5 - o3 Time: I -. � 5 Project Name: �4.' ,, Project Addr /Location: Planner: M. Kfjs', Applicant Name: -TG...,t, M, hers Phone: Firm: Type of Petition: C J Owner Name: ? n r, G r , Current Zoning A Owner Address: `j0 % K) C Dr lua sj Phone: Meeting Attendees: V ` m, %( s. Kt x, A W , SUB=MITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ® 20 copies of Application, completed ® One (1) Addressing Checklist signed by Addressing Dept ® 20 copies of Pre - application meeting notes ® 20 copi /z es of Conceptual Site Plan 24" X 36" plus (one 8 ' X 1 I copy) ® Two (2) Copies of Deed(s) Completed Owner /Agent Affidavits, Notarized ❑ Four (4) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), or waiver. Five (5) Aerial Photographs (taken within the previous 12 months) Statement of utiiit}' pro�.'isions (with all required attachments & sketches) 1 Sc,3-(A -313 AGENDA ITEM JAN 13 2004 r g•_'� Z_ ❑ Seven (7) 1'raf:`-ic Impact Statement (TIS), or waiver ❑ Four (4) Historical and Archeological Survey, or waiver ❑ Copies of State and %or Federal Permits El Four (4) Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s) Pre - application Fee 5300.00 (to be credited toward application fee below) [� Fees: 52000.00* Application Fee 525.00 Data Conversion S150.00 Fire Code Review ❑ S1600.00 EIS Review, if required *$750.00 if filed in conjunction with a rezone petition OTHER REQUIREMENTS: ® r d - cof,j 01 G I CGt iu CU�itC� t►�1�5 V,iu C. F,uI D,JF -,cf �.1 35. Cody o f -MSi11 ffat ,� 4►2 Qo,� y /�,4� .�i =�i�. NOTES: (.s V o_ —AV -0 Cp) 'n 4 f r\ cvlt4 f i , ^r coo- ZC o rXC me_ h,_ Agent/Owner Signature C�- ��,�, ,G, tf --�� -� Date K S3 D w AGEMA ITEM n Na� JINN 13 2004 �. a g SECTION 2.6.35 COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS REQUIREMENTS 1. Need for tower Letter from Coast Guard T,etter from Communication Services, Inc 2. Shared Use Plan for new and proposed tower 3. Inspection of existing tower 4. Fall Zone and interference with exi -ting tower,4nd new tower design Letter from Pinnacle Towel ,nc. Structural Engineer Letter from Broadcast Components Inc Tower design from Saber Communications Corp. 5. FAA 6. Other documents related to the tower section 0 AGENDA ITEhl .JAN 13 2004 PROJECT 420524 g2_�� PROJECT #2003060041 �„�,�, DATE: 7/31/03 MIKE BOSI COMPANION ITEM TO VA- 2003 -AR -4525 Wireless Planning Services, LCC James B. Malless, AICP 845 Mississippi Ave. July 22, 2003 Lakeland, FL 33801 Michael Bosi, Principal Planner Planning Services Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Section 2.6.35 Communications Towers for Pinnacle Towers Inc. Site on 305 Tower Road Dear Mr. Bosi: Enclosed are 7 sets of information to meet the Section 2.6.35 Communications Towers section of the Collier County Land Development Code. The following section of this Ietter is designed to meet several requirements regarding Communications Towers. Sections 2.6.35.4.5 and 2.6.35.5 - Pinnacle Towers Inc. agrees to lease space to any FCC licensed carrier at a reasonable rental rate assuming that the tower can structural support the antennas and the antennas will not cause interference with existing tenants. There are no restrictions on the parcel that would prevent PTI from leasing space. Section 2.6.35.5 - PTI agrees to respond to any inquires for tower space within 30 days. Section 2.6.35.6.7 - Pinnacle Towers Inc. acknowledges this section of the code. Section 2.6.35.6.24 — This tower and all antennas will meet or exceed the requirements of the FCC and PTI will manage the facility to meet the FCC standards and meet the NIER standards (Section 2.6.35.6.31). Section 2.6.35.6.26 — Additional Findings - The information provided by the US Coast Guard and its contractor Communication Services, Inc support a finding that there is no other facility to accommodate the Cast Guard communications needs. The fall zone letter is in the Communications Towers package. PTI has applied to the FAA for its approval and the approval is expected within a month. I am available at 863- 838 -9686 to discuss the applications and to answer questions. Sincerely-, James B. Maness, AICP Wireless Planning Services, LLC Attachments: A(itNUA 1 1 G: NO. JAN 13 2004 CU- 2003 -AR -4524 Pg. 190 PROJECT #2003060 DATE: 7/31/03 MIKE BOSI COMPANION ITEM TO VA- 2003- AR4525 U.S. Department of Commanding Officer 909 SE 1" Ave Homeland Security United States Coast Guard Miami, fl. 33131 Electronics Support Unit Miami Phone:(305) 415 -7000 United States Fax: (305) 412 -7127 Coast Guard Naples Collier County Government - Planning Services Department Subject: Site Selection Methodology and Justification The selected tower candidate in the Naples area is on the existing parcel owned by Pinnacle Towers at 301 Tower Road, Isle of Capri in Naples, Florida. In the effort not to build any new towers for the Rescue 21 program or at a minimum if tower construction cannot be avoided the desire to co- locate new construction at an existing site is preferred. We completed a search within a 5 -mile radius of the existing site in Naples and did not find any viable alternate candidates. However alternate candidates were located in Bonita Springs (approximately 12 miles North), unfortunately due to the height requirement for the extra coverage needed because of non - optimum geographical location, these towers failed structurally, and the same scenario would fall into place of needing to build a new tower (only taller). The Coast Guard understands "Not In My Back - Yard" and if there was any other way to secure our coastline for our citizens and to provide the services we are counted on day in and day out any other way, we would go down that path. But unfortunately there is not. In the effort to produce no gaps of radio frequency coverage for the boatirie. community nation wide, the Naples site works in conjunction with towers to the north and se•..:h of Naples. With this tower being the most southern tower on the western coast of Florida, not getting an approval for a tower in this particular area could pose a domino affect for the towers already identified and secured on the western coast of Florida. The height of 700' is justified by the need of radio frequency coverage in the highly populated marine environment of the Marco Island vacation and resort area. This area has had poor radio frequency coverage for quite some time and is of great concern to the Coast Guard. With the height of a 700' tower in Naples Marco Island will have 100% RF coverage. Sincerely, Chief Petty Officer Electronics Technician Pte.[ Cl•,4ut4" P•owc Paul Christopher Rowe tti!o. GENDI JAN 13 2004 CU- 2003 -AR -4524 Pg. J f PROJECT #200306004 DATE: 7131103 MIKE BOSI COMPANION ITEM TO VA- 2003 -AR -4525 Rescue 21 Proiect Backizrounder Callinjj America's Lifesaver • The U.S. Coast Guard — "America's Shield of Freedom" — provides an invaluable service to citizens of this nation. As the round - the -clock protector of America's inland waterways and coastlines (including 361 ports and harbors) the Coast Guard provides a myriad of services along roughly 95,000 miles of U.S. coastlines. These services include: • Search and rescue (SAR) missions to aid both recreational boaters and commercial mariners; • Law enforcement activities such as drug interdiction and immigration patrols; • Expanded national defense and homeland security duties in support of the war on terrorism; • Environmental response to assist in the cleanup of oil and chemical spills; and • Other operations in support of maritime safety and security. • The Coast Guard is part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Tom Ridge, Secretary). Expanding Mission • The Coast Guard is best known worldwide for its search and rescue (SAR) mission expertise that dates back more than 200 years to the earliest days of the Revenue Cutter Service and Life - Saving Service. • Today, despite the nation's best efforts to prevent maritime accidents, the Coast Guard responds to approximately 60,000 emergency calls and saves nearly 5,000 lives in an average year. In addition to responding to communications from other Coast Guard Stations and vessels, Coast Guard watchstanders respond to emergency signals and calls that are delivered from civilian commercial and recreational boaters via cell phones, handheld VHF signals, Marine VHF signals, HF and MF signals, flares, flash lights, and flags. • Coast Guard SAR response involves multi - mission Stations, cutters, aircraft, and boats linked by communications networks. The National SAR Plan divides the U.S. area of responsibility into internationally recognized inland and maritime SAR regions, with the Coast Guard acting as the maritime SAR coordinator. To meet this responsibility, the Coast Guard maintains SAR .he East, `Yes", and C-,-,!f Hawaii, Guam, and Puerto Rico, as well as on the Great Lakes and inland U.S. waterways. About Rescue 21 • Rescue 21 is an advanced search and rescue (SAR) communications system that helps the Coast Guard more effectively locate and assist boaters in distress. The new system — fully operational by September 2006 — replaces the Coast Guard's current communications system, the National Distress Response System (NDRS), built in the 1970s. Among other capabilities, Rescue 21 enhances line -of -site coverage, increases position localization on a VHF -FM transmission, increases the number of voice and data channels available to the Coast Guard from one to six, and improves communications and information sharing between Coast Guard units and their federal, state, and local partners. Rescue 21 will save lives in the 215tcentury. " Rescue 21 Installation • A $611 million program, Rescue 21 plans call for the first systems to be in pla e by JAN 13 2004 30, 2003, in Atlantic City, N.J. and Chincoteague, Va. Plans call for system installation to be completed in all 46 Coast Guard regions by Sept. 30, 2006. • Rescue 21 communications hardware and software will replace the current National Distress and Response System (NDRS), which has been in operation since the 1970. • Rescue 21 entails the replacement of 3,000 Coast Guard portable VHF -FM radios; also, replacement will include: • Equipment at all remote VHF -FM transceiver sites and supplementing the network that interconnects the remote sites to the Coast Guard facilities; • Communications consoles at 270 Coast Guard facilities • Communications equipment on 657 Coast Guard vessels Rescue 21 Timelines • Rescue 21 implementation plans call for the first systems to be in place by September 30, 2003 in Atlantic City, N.J. and Chincoteague, Virginia. • Thirty-five percent of the sites, or 16 out of 46 regions, are to be completed by September 2004. Deployment plans call for system installation in all 46 Coast Guard regions coast - to -coast by September 30, 2006. • The Coast Guard's search and rescue (SAR) mission is likely to become even more challenging in the years ahead. Current and future trends indicate: • Increased maritime trade, resulting in unparalleled growth in the size and numbers of ships using inland, coastal, and international waterways; • Fishing vessels and offshore petroleum platforms venturing farther offshore; and • U.S. Coast Guard Rescue 21 Press Kit Facts Page 1 of 3 United States Coast Guard Rescue 21 Communications & Outreach Plan • Dramatically increasing numbers of personal watercraft and recreational boats, fueling greater congestion in the nation's waterways. Rescue 21 Features and Benefits • Rescue 21 ensures continuous enhanced radio coverage out to 20 nautical miles from shore. Rescue 21 is powerful enough to hear the low- powered (1 -watt) marine radios transmitting from 20 nautical miles offshore. Higher - powered radios may be heard even farther offshore. • Rescue 21 supports a modern distress call feature known as Digital Selective Calling. The DSC signal received by Rescue 21 transmits vital vessel information, position, and nature of distress (if entered) at the push of a button that can be relayed through other nearby vessels to shore -side rescue authorities. The DSC radio can continuously transmit a MAYDAY automatically when the vessel operator may be prevented from doing so. To make this technology work, however, the boater must properly register the radio for an MMSI number and ensure it is connected to a Global Positioning System (GPS) navigation system. Rescue 21 increases channel capacity and allows for simultaneous communications on six channels, from commonly used Channel 16 to the new Channel 70 for digital selective calling (DSC). This enables Coast Guard watch standers to conduct multiple operations. Rescue 21's position location or direction finding capability allows Coast Guard personnel to pinpoint distressed vessels with either an actual position or along a bearing with 2 degrees accuracy. Rescue 21 offers protected communications for sensitive (unclassified) inform i A NDA ITEM '4• JAN 13 2004 pg. 33 tracking for response coordination and digital voice recording with immediate playback for analyzing weak distress calls. • Rescue 21 reduces system downtime by maintaining a 99.5% operational availability rate. Rescue 21 and the Environment • Whenever possible, the Coast Guard will co- locate system hardware or use /modify existing structures. • Should new towers need to be built, the Coast Guard will attempt to erect new towers on existing Coast Guard property and work hand -in -hand with officials from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service so as to minimize the impact on the environment. Only when, absolutely necessary will the Coast Guard erect new towers elsewhere. • The most likely Rescue 21 environmental impacts will occur in deployment sites on or near migratory bird flyways. Towers with guy wires especially pose a collision hazard to migrating flocks of birds, and are only being constructed if no other options exist. • The Coast Guard is also committed to minimizing the impact of new tower construction on environmentally fragile wetland areas and historically significant sites. Rescue 21's Interoperability • Rescue 21 improves communications and information sharing between Coast Guard units and their federal, state, and local partners. This is vital to assure the well being of both recreational boaters and commercial mariners in regions requiring joint federal, state, and local response. • By replacing outdated technology with a fully integrated communications system that bridges interoperability gaps, the Coast Guard's ability to protect mariners and our coasts — especially in this time of heightened homeland security — will become increasingly more effective. Communication Limitations • The communications network that currently acts as the backbone to the Coast Guard's SAR efforts • is the National Distress and Response System (NDRS). Established more than 30 years ago as a sort of "maritime 911," this VHF -FM -based system has a range of up to 20 nautical miles along most of the U.S. shoreline. While this system has served the Coast Guard well over the years, it consists of out -of -date and non - uniform equipment and includes numerous communications limitations. These limitations include: • Limited direction finding capability; • Numerous communications coverage gaps; • Lack of communications interoperability with Coast Guard's various partners and customers; and • Single channel radio operation, which prohibits the ability to receive radio calls when the system is engaged in a transmission. The Solution: Rescue 21 • In October of 2002, the U.S. Coast Guard began modernizing the 30- year -old NDRS. The Coast Guard's antiquated SAR communications and data systems technology is being - replaced by newer, more advanced, and more effective communications technology developed by General Dynamics Decision Systems under a project called "Resc . AGENDA • System implementation of Rescue 21 kicks off in Financial Year (FY) 20 3. 4 JAN 13 2004 Pg.__J Deployment plans call for completion of system installation in all 46 Coast Guard regions coast -to -coast by the end of FY 2006. nited States Coast Guard Rescue 21 Frequently asked Questions 1. What company was selected as the winner of the RESCUE 21 contract? • General Dynamics- Decision Systems (GDDS) of Scottsdale, AZ 2. Are there any subsidiaries or subcontractors? • American Nucleonics Corps, Westlake Village, CA • BAE Systems, Austin, TX CACI, Inc, Chantilly, VA • Communications Services, Inc, Mesa, AZ Motorola, Inc, Hanover, MD Fuentez Systems Concept, Inc. (FSC), Charleston, S.C. • L &E Associates, Oxon Hill, Md. 3. Why was General Dynamics- Decision Systems selected? • GDDS's proposal was evaluated as the overall best value to the Government in meeting the requirements defined in the Request for Proposal. 4. Why does the Coast Guard need to modernize its national distress system (NDS)? • Modemizing the Nation's maritime 911 system is absolutely needed to ensure America's waterways remain safe. • The existing system is difficult to maintain and inadequate to meet the safety requirements of the growing marine traffic. 5. What benefits will RESCUE 21 bring? • RESCUE 21 will greatly increase detection and localization.of distress calls. • Eliminate known radio coverage gaps. • Enh� r ,ast Guard command and control capabilities across ail missions, inch. )meland security, on the Nation's inland and coastal waterways. 6. Prior to this contract, how much had the Coast Guard expended to develop the project? • Effort up through Phase I cost $49.1 million (FY97 — FY01) 7. What is the Coast Guard asking for in its current budget request? • We requested $90 million in our FY03 budget request to complete the first 6 regions (out of 46 total) and to begin 15 new regions. S. What is the value of the RESCUE 21 contract award? • The RESCUE 21 production and deployment contract has an initial award value of $25 million, with a total value, including all options, of $611 milli . eAGEt�I JAN 13 2004 ps 3 6 9. When will the system be deployed and when will it be completed? • The RESCUE 21 system will be fully deployed around the country by 2006. • The first deployment sites are Coast Guard groups in Atlantic City, NJ, and Eastern Shore, VA (on Chincoteague Island). 10. What was the criteria for selection of the first deployment sites? • The main criteria was to deploy the system in the shortest timeframe. 11. How long will it take to complete the deployment? • The first systems are planned to be in place by the end of FY03; 35% or16 of 46 regions completed by the end of FY04; 70% or 36 regions completed by end of FY05; with the deployment completed by the end of FY06. (The rollout plan is also on our web site.) 12. How does RESCUE 21 improve on the existing system? • RESCUE 21 will continuously monitor Channel 16 and the new Channel 70 Digital Selective Calling channel for distress calls. • Provide continuous radio coverage out to 20 nautical miles, eliminating existing radio coverage gaps. • Provide caller location information. • Automatically record and play back distress calls, and allow the Coast Guard watchstander to slow them down and adjust the quality until the message is understood. • Track Coast Guard response assets. • Provide interoperability with other federal, state and local public safety partners. • Protect sensitive information. • Enable the Coast Guard to meet the federal narrow- banding mandate. • Provide greater reliability, availability and recoverability. • These features not only increase the Coast Guard's ability to successfully respond to search and rescue cases, but also increase its ability to successfully perform other Coast Guard missions. 13. What components must be upgraded and what advantages do the upgrades provide? • The existing components will not be upgraded. The entire system will be REPLACED. 14. How antiquated is the existing system? • The system was installed in the early 70's. • A good analogy would be to compare computers in the early 70's to the available units today. Communications technology basically advances at the same pace. 15. How does RESCUE 21 relate to the CG's Deepwater project ?....Homela Security? NO. I ITE!, JAN 13 2004 pg at Rescue 21 will form the backbone for the Coast Guard's short-range communications system. Deepwater will update and improve the capabilities of the Coast Guard's current fleet of ships and aircraft. RESCUE 21 provides interoperability between Deepwater and the Homeland Security agencies that enables the rapid exchange of information with our various operating partners. 16. When did the CG initiate this project? • This project was initiated in the mid- 1990's. 17. Are there cases where the more modern system may have saved lives or enabled the Coast Guard to more efficiently respond to an emergency? • To say that RESCUE 21 would have changed the outcome of past cases would be purely speculative. The new system will reduce response times by providing the technology to help take the search out of Search and Rescue, which in turn will save more lives. 18. How will the Coast Guard train its people to use the new system? • Training for RESCUE 21 has been integrated into the contract. • The contractor will develop and deliver both entry and advanced level training programs for Coast Guard personnel. The contractor will also provide on site training when the system is delivered to a region. 19. Can the system be deployed sooner? • No. The schedule was designed to deploy the system in the most efficient manner possible. 20. If it is to be phased in how will this affect the units with the existing system? • As specified in the contract, the Coast Guard will be able to continuously monitor distress calls throughout the transition. 21. Will this system be interoperable with DOD? • The RESCUE 21 has been designed to work with other agencies including the DOD and civilian agencies using federal communications interoperability standards. 22. Has the recent OMB budget restriction on homeland security information technology spending affected deployment of RESCUE 21? • No. RESCUE 21 was reviewed and determined to be a mission critical system, which should not be delayed. 23. Will boaters need to buy any new equipment? • No. Existing marine radios will be compatible with RESCUE 21. 24. Will RESCUE 21 be capable of responding to cell phone distress calls? JAN 13 2004 P9---jJ- - • RESCUE 21 is a radio -based system and does not replace cellular or mobile phone systems. • Cell phone calls will continue to be received as they are now. 25. How is RESCUE 21 a better distress system than using a cell phone? RESCUE 21 provides full coverage out to 20 NM, whereas cell phones do not. • Cell phones are point -to -point transmissions that can only be received by a single party. RESCUE 21 provides broadcast signals that can be received by other vessels / aircraft within range of the broadcast, thereby increasing probability of rescue. 26. Does the Coast Guard intend to replace Channel 16 communications with Digital Selective Calling? • The Coast Guard has no near -term plans to replace Channel 16 as the primary method of distress notification. The Coast Guard will begin monitoring Channel 70 (Digital Selective Calling channel) with the deployment of Rescue 21. If properly registered with a Mobile Maritime Service Identity (MMSI) number and interfaced with the vessel's GPS, a DSC radio signal transmits vital vessel information, position, and the nature of distress (if entered) at the push of a button. 27. How far will Rescue 21 penetrate interior to the U.S.? • Rescue 21 coverage will extend 10 miles inland from the territorial sea baseline of coastal rivers or waterways. In addition, when fully implemented, Rescue 21 will provide coverage in the Great Lakes and along the Western Rivers. AGENDA ITEM Na JAN 13 2004 P9 3 7 I, Communication Services, Inc. Site Selection: Naples Tower 305 Tower Rd. Naples, Fl. 4710 Eisenhower Blvd., Suite C -5, Tampa, FL 33634 Telephone (813) 882 -8470 Fax (813) 882 -8478 Communication Services Inc. working as a Sub Contractor to General Dynamics has performed the due diligence for the United States Coast Guard for their Rescue 21 Project. The Due Diligence Process for this site began in the year 2001. This site was originally selected as an existing 700 ft. tower that was capable of handling the installation of the USCG Equipment. The tower has since been reduced to 500 ft and is no longer capable of handling the USCG Equipment at the Needed Elevations. It is for this reason that we are requesting the approval to install a New 700 ft. tower at this existing Iocation. We have attached the following information to clarify the vast amount of effort and research invested in the selection of this particular location as well as an overall view of the Rescue 21 Project. 1. Re - ae 21 Project. - ,Description 2. Rescue 21 System Capabilities 3. Rescue 21 Implementation 4. Rescue 21 Project Status 5. Site Identification Form ( J -07P 6. Site Lay Out 7. Site Location Maps 8. Existing Site Pictures 9. Vicinity and Access Maps 10. Justification Report 11. Environmental Analysis Summary 11. Environmental Site Assessment Checklist 12. Frequency Authorization Request Form ( J -08p 13. RF Analysis Summary 14. RF Co -Site Interference Analysis 15. Construction Plan JAN 13 2004 CU- 2003 -AR -4524 PROJECT #2003060041 L Pg. DATE: 7/31/03 MIKE BOSI COMPANION ITEM TO VA- 2003- AR4525 Cover Rescue 21.doc �f National Distress and Response System Modernization Project U.S COAST GUARD �ii -RESCUE21 SAVING LIVES IN THE 21_st CENTURY Project Description Objective The objective of this project is to modernize and upgrade the National Distress and Response System. Follow this link to an Adobe Acrobat 5.0 file for an introduction to the project -- "NDRSMP 101." The NDRSMP is one of the cornerstones of our transformation in shaping the future of our service. The project began in the mid -1990s when it became apparent that the current NDRS was becoming technologically obsolete. The modernized system will provide the Coast Guard with a means to: • Coordinate search and rescue response operations. • Provide command and control (C2) for Coast Guard units (Active, Auxiliary, and Reserve) performing Maritime Safety, Maritime Law Enforcement, National Security, and Marine Environmental Protection missions. The NDRSMP will provide essential communications between Coast Guard facilities (e.g., Activities, Groups, Sections, MSOs, Stations, cutters, boats, selected vehicles, and detached personnel), the Coast Guard's customers (e.g., recreational and commercial mariners); and partners like other Federal (including the other military services), state, and local agencies. Follow this link to an Adobe Acrobat 5.0 file showing the NDRSMP conceptual architecture The modernized system will support all Coast Guard missions in the coastal maritime environment: Maritime Safety, Maritime Law Enforcement, National Security, and Marine Environmental Protection. Background The current NDRS consists of a network of approximately 300 VHF -FM antenna high sites with analog transceivers which are remotely controlled by regional communication centers and selected stations providing coverage out to approximately 20 nautical miles from shore in most areas. The present system does not provide complete coverage of continental U.S. coastal areas, bays, inlets, and river systems. There are numerous localized coverage deficiencies identified by local operational commanders. (Note: complete coverage for Alaska and Hawaii was not part of the initial design; this was a Coast Guard decision made in 1975). The existing system has the capability to guard channel 16 (VHF -FM international distress frequency); however, the distress watch is interrupted during any transmission by the monitoring site. (Note: In the Western Rivers and Alaska, the system does not have Channel 16 guard receivers.). Next, C2 is often jeopardized because the system does not have adequate channel capacity and allows only one conversation on one frequency at a time. In addition, essential communications with other Federal, state -end local agencies are often hindered or unavailable due to the lack of compatible comm ,quipment. aA ITB JAN 13 2004 pd. " _ Much of the existing equipment was installed in the 1970's. It is no longer commercially available shelf and is becoming increasingly difficult to Sued Equipment failures have necessitated the port. placement many expected y service system f for p this equipment was 1! longer commercially repairable. Enhancements such as multi - channel recorders, instant playback recorders, and localized direction finding equipment were installed in some locations to meet needs identified after the original system's construction. All of these factors have contributed to an ov erall lack of system integration and standardization. Acquisition Strategy The NDRSMP employed atwo- phased acquisition strategy. Contracts ntractorsfthe Phase I Concept and Tecnolc Systems (who acquired Motorola System Solutions Group), Lockheed Martin Co (SIC)--Genera l Development were awarded to three Systems Integration C Dynamics Decision rporation, and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). In Phase I, the three SICs developed the functional design, the preliminary design, and demonstrated and validated the design for operational and functional suitability The main objective for this phase was to develop design concepts that will best satisfy Coast Guard missio n requirements at an affordable cost, with minimum acceptable technical risk. The Phase I SICs participated in a limited competition for Phase II, System Development, Demonstration Production and Deployment. The Phase II Request for Proposal (RFP) was released on February, 8, 2002• it solicited proposals for the full -scale development of the modernized system from the three SICs. Final , proposals were received on 08 April 2002 and were thoroughly evaluated for technical approach and cost. T Government selected the proposal that represented the best value to meet the NDRSMP requirements, and 24 September, 2002 the Phase II contract was awarded to General Dynamics Decision Systems to deploy th Rescue 21 system. Under this contract, General Dynamics will be responsible for final design completion testing, implementation, deployment, and initial system support. be and fdevelopmental (of- the - shelf) equipment. A limited amount system development design utilize valuation can be expected in order to provide in!'- gration of the non - developmental items. The overarching objectives for the SIC to build the entire system d provide single -point responsibility. jOfficial USCG Home Pagel I (WebmastPrl Last modified: 12/20/2002 17:15:19 Q, U.S. Department of Transporfa!ior AGENDA ITEM JAN 13 L004 Pd. National Distress and Response System Modernization Project U.S. COAST GUARD .RESCUE21 SAVING LIVES IN THE 21st CENTURY Rescue 21 System Capabilities The core function of the National Distress and Response System Modernization Project (NDRSMP) is to provide reliable two -way voice and data communications between shore stations, vessels, and vehicles in the coastal maritime environment. Follow this link to an Adobe Acrobat 5.0 file to see a summary of NDRS capabilities. Capabilities of the "Rescue 2l" system include: Communications Coverage. The system will provide coverage out to 20 nautical miles seaward of the Territorial Sea Baseline of the contiguous U.S. Coast, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam and Gulf of Alaska coastal zone. Coverage also includes the Great Lakes, navigable waters of the Intracoastal Waterway System, and the Western Rivers. Coverage is based on a transmission from a low - power, one -watt omni directional transmitter at two - meters of elevation. This is the minimum transmit strength for a VHF radio. However, it is important to note that the standard VHF marine radio transmits at 25 watts, resulting in a considerably greater coverage area. Position Localization. Direction finding (DF) equipment that is accurate within plus or minus two degrees will be installed throughout the entire communications coverage area. At a minimum, the DF equipment will provide one line of bearing (LOB) to a voice transmission. The maximum search area to locate mariners, with a single line of bearing, is 25 square nautical miles. In many regions, the system will receive more than one LOB, which will reduce the search area. Furthermore, a Digital Selective Calling (DSC) radio equipped with GPS will provide a pinpoint location. Follow this link to an Adobe Acrobat 5.0 file to learn more about the modernized system's DF capability. • Digital Selective Calling (DSC). The modernized system will include DSC send and receive capability in the entire coverage area. Low cost DSC radios are capable of instantly transmitting exact location, name of vessel, nature of distress and other vital information when used in conjunction with an integrated GPS receiver and properly registered Maritime Mobile Service Identity (MMSI) number. • Operational Availability. Operational commanders and mariners in general rely on the NDRS 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for vital communications. The modernized system will demonstrate a high state of operational readiness - 99.50 % - -for all critical functions. • Channel Capacity. Sufficient capacity to perform in multi - functional mission areas, in crisis operations, and support multiple operations in the same or separate geographic areas. This includes six simultaneous communications channels to include distress channels 16 & 70 DSC, two VHF -FM channels, one UHF channel, and one VHF -FM or UHF data channel • Data Communications. Send and receive data on one communication channel at 9. JAN 13 2004 Pq. 4a • Automated Broadcasts. Both VHF -FM voice capability and automated transmission of scheduled/unscheduled marine information broadcasts. • Interoperability. The modernized system will interoperate with federal agencies (such as FEMA, DOT FBI, Secret Service, DEA), and State and local government agencies (such as police forces and emergency service agencies) to support emergencies or natural disasters. The system will use the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials' (APCO) Project 25 standard. • Maintainability. Since the modernized system provides vital communications for Coast Guard units and mariners in many areas, a national maintenance strategy has been developed to reduce system down time and meet the operational availability requirement of 99.50 %. • Automatic Asset Tracking. The new system will be capable of automatically tracking the position of all Coast Guard mobile assets (i.e. vessels, aircraft, etc). This will enhance the Coast Guard's ability to coordinate all mission activities. • Recordable Communications. The new system will digitally record, time stamp, and provide the instant playback and archiving of unclassified communications, both voice and data. • Protected Communications. Provide covered (protected) communications of Sensitive, But Unclassified (SBLD voice and data information throughout the coverage area, using APCO - 25 standards. . • Recoverability. Restore critical functions under degraded conditions ranging from accidents and natural disasters to conventional war within 24 hours and full recoverability within seven days. [Official USCG Home Pagel I Mebmasterl Last modified: 07/02/2003 15:45:34 12 U.S. Department of Transportatior AGENDA ITEM MO. JAN 13 2004 Pg. T� National Distress and Response System Modernization Proje4 U S. COAST GUARD SAVING LIVES IN THE 21st CENT(JRY Implementation The NDRSMP team has shifted its focus from system design to system implementation. This corresponds to the transition from Phase I (Concept and Technology Development) to Phase II (System Development, Demonstration, Production and Deployment). The modernized Rescue 21 system will be deployed in the 46 Coast Guard Group Regions during a three -year period (FY03- FY06). The System will be deployed region by region in accordance with the nationwide implementation schedule. As per the implementation schedule, the system will first be deployed in two Initial Operational Capability (IOC) or prototype regions (Groups Atlantic City and Eastern Shore). After the system is installed, thoroughly tested and operating correctly in the prototype regions, deployment will commence in the remaining Coast Guard regions starting with the Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) regions (Groups St Petersburg, Mobile, Seattle and Port Angeles. Process • Rescue 21 deployment is built upon a 5 -stage process. The first step is internal data gathering and unit awareness conducted by the NDRSMP team. The remaining 4 steps are structured as delivery orders to be performed by the Phase II Systems Integration Contractor (SIC). The project staff has established independent teams that will work closely with regional representatives to facilitate and monitor the progress of each of the implementation stages. This process will be carried out independently in each region. • Preparatory Stage — During this stage, a project team will work closely with region personnel to raise their awareness about the upcoming system deployment and gather information that is needed for subsequent stages. Some of this information includes operational schedules, unit points of contact, and other regions specific data. Detailed Regional Implementation Plan Stage -The SIC will gather information through site surveys of the region and develop a detailed plan for the deployment of the system. This stage will involve visits by the SIC to Coast Guard units throughout the region. Following the site surveys, the SIC will submit the Detailed Regional Implementation Plan to the Coast Guard for review. Project personnel will team with region representatives and members of their chain of command to review these plans and address issues as necessary. Infrastructure Preparation Stage — During this stage, the SIC will prepare the infrastructure within a region so that the communications equipment can be installed during the following stage. This involves establishing remote antennae sites, or Remote Fixed Facilities (RFFs), to support the new system and the installation of a data network that connects the RFFs with CG communications centers. This stage may also involve modifications to existing Coast Guard units. AGENDA JAN 13 2004 Pig. - • Install and test the modernized system - During this stage, the SIC will physically install the communications equipment at CG facilities (i.e. RFFs, communication centers and vess throughout the 'region. After the new system is installed and thoroughly tested, it will beco. the operational system and the legacy system (old system) will be de- installed. Operator training will be provided by the SIC during this stage. Support and Maintenance Stage — The SIC will provide follow -on maintenance and support of the modernized system through a national maintenance contract. (Official USCG Home Pagel I (Webmasterl Last modified: 12/20/2002 17 :15:53 1' U.S. Department of Transportation. AGENDA ITEM JAN 13 2004 �f National Distress and Response System Modernization Project U.S. COAST GUARD ■ems iRESCIjEZI SAVING L /VES IN THE 21st CENTURY Project Status 3 Status The Coast Guard completed the Phase I contract (Concept and Technology Development Phase) of the project on February 5, 2002. The Phase II Request for Proposal (RFP) was released on February 8, 2002; it solicited. proposals for the full -scale development of the modernized system from each of the three Phase I System Integration Contractors (SICs). The Coast Guard evaluated each proposal and selected the proposal that represented the best value to meet the NDRSMP requirements, and awarded the Phase II contract to General Dynamics Decision Systems on September 24, 2002. General Dynamics is responsible for final design completion, testing, implementation, deployment, and initial system support. Significant milestones are summarized below: • Request for Proposal (RFP) for Phase I was released to industry on December 2, 1999. • Phase I System contracts were awarded on August 2, 2000 to Lockheed Martin Corporation, Motorola System Solutions Group, and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). The award was announced in COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC 071855Z AUG 00 (ALCOAST 325/00). • Key Decision Point (KDP) 2 was approved January 31, 2002. This decision enabled the NDRSMP tcj move into Phase II. • Phase I contracts ended on February 5, 2002. During Phase I, the SICs developed their functional design, their preliminary design, and demonstrated and validated their design for operational and functional suitability. Additionally, the Phase I SICs completed detailed site surveys for the Initial Operating Capability (IOC) regions [Groups Atlantic City and Eastern Shore] and the Low -Rate Initial Production (LRIP) regions [Groups Seattle, Port Angeles, St. Petersburg and Mobile]. • The Request for Proposal (RFP) for Phase II was released to the Phase I contractors [Lockheed Martin Corporation, General Dynamics Decision Systems (who acquired Motorola System Solutions Group), and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)] on February 8, 2002. This was announced in COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC R 121757Z FEB 02 (ALCOAST 056/02). • Proposals from each of the three Phase I SICs were received by the NDRSMP Project office on 08 April, 2002. AGENDA ITEM JAN 13 2004 Pg. '7'�P After a thorough proposal evaluation phase, during which each proposal was evaluated objectively for technical approach and cost criteria, the Coast Guard determined the General Dynamics proposal represented the best overall value to the government, and on September 24, 2002 awarded the Phase II contract to General Dynamics Decision Systems. Timeline The following table provides a high -level summary of the project schedule. Completion Date Event/Activity .December 1999 Issue RFP for Phase I - Concept and Technology Development July 2000 ;Source Selection Decision ,August 2000 Award Phase I Contracts March 2001 System Design Review — — 'CGARC Meeting - Revised Operational Requirements Document !June 2001 (ORD) (Change 1) and Acquisition Project Baseline (APB) (Change 2) October 2001 'Preliminary Design Review .November 2001 'Critical Functions Demonstration :January 2002 Key Decision Point (KDP) 2 (per SAM 2001 revision F) — —� February 2002 Issue RFP for Phase II - System Development, Demonstration, Production and Deployment 'September 2002 :Source Selection Decision :September 2002 Award Phase II Contract QIFY03 - Q3FY03 Complete Developmental Test Report Q3FY03 - Q4FY03 Complete Operational Test Report 'Q3FY03 - Q4FY03 Achieve Rescue 21 Initial Operational Capability (IOC) Q4FY03 - Q1FY04 Key Decision Point (KDP) 3 (Enter Production and Deployment) 'QIFY04 - Q4FY06 ;Deploy Regional Rescue 21 Systems Q3FY06 - Q4FY06 :Achieve Full Operational Capability (FOC) [Official USCG Home Pagel l f Webmasterl Last modified: 12/20/2002 17:18:03 I0 U.S. Department of Transportatior• AN 13 2004 Pa 41 5.13.2 SITE IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION (J -07P FORM) SITE IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION (The following information needs to be submitted by the NDRSMP System Integration Contractor for each site that the USCG. Real Property Branch will be responsible for acquiring. This form needs to accompany the package of information that is to be submitted for each site. An explanation is required for any box checked N/A below). ATTACHMENT J -07P (For DRIP submission as hart of the Phase ll Provosal onlv) SITE LOCATION N/A Naples 1. Provide accurate description on the location of the property. Use physical address; otherwise provide section/township /range, latitude and longitude, or Tax Map Key Number. Address: 305 Tower Road, Naples, FL 34112 Latitude: 26° 03' 12" Longitude: 81° 42' 10" Parcel: 724360000 2. Attach site map, location map, region map and photos. Is Ch,166 cm, Cat l r mushy Hosphal 1Con Naples +Esat Naples 84 j I 86 1 Directions: >' 41 From St Petersburg: Take Interstate 275, 19 miles South to Interstate 75. Take 1 -75 South, N P 128 miles to SR 84. Take SR 84 about .5 miles to County Road ell de 951. Take CR 951 West, 6.6 miles to US 41. Pass through US 41 and go an additional 1.5 0 1 o$hem Island old Wrco .:unction Miles South on the right look for \ 41 the dirt access road to the site. Royal Palm Hammo .M.- bf apri Marco eCoIIuSxranwl:t Old Grove o0rocvy Pace 5-3 -05.801 5 -214 Volume II - DRIP 5 St. Petersburg Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the We Page of this AGENDA ITEM Na JAN 13 20,34 H a Ida >ke Motu Arista , acksonville JacksorM/e Bear c liy dwe � M e ey e v S 51 Joe ar c Sl Jena AuguzUm Cr Y Tre I� 6 Inesvl I ' \ J Cali Daytona C Drreland New S" Sb-0 Senf T Titus% O -. I Coco P lei Tarpon Spr Clewwarerl 1 i d M1lnter taI r AGENDA ITEM n � 5 -216 Volume II - DRIP 5 St. Petersburg JAN 13 2uJ4 Use or discbsure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title Page of this roposal� Pg•_! L_ fadenton Sebrkrg �S�r 'as otl �✓ Noi3nvra 6echc s rt Charkrtte a Gorda e `P L �n'iers �o C Pe C ral Naples `�� Region Map 5 -3- 05.802 CHEROKEETRL f r oOb f PRICE I 41 Q� ^ C f D { GRIFFIN RD $ O� O w m�g'� m I- r 0 4i?7 c} m m tff r z z 3 NAP w BOjc Clj&Y -SS u w TOWER RD it t RrVERWOOD RD uj CRLe�� Beds Meads GARNET Q. La's O04'CERY Rp AMETHYST ONYX < t MANATEE RD oral We Factory Owlet n SHELL ISLAND RD �} a. w DIAMOND LAKE ^+ 00 p r- L O GROSBEAK LN Location Map s- ws.802 AGENDA ITEM n � 5 -216 Volume II - DRIP 5 St. Petersburg JAN 13 2uJ4 Use or discbsure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title Page of this roposal� Pg•_! L_ It will take two sites to replace the extende tower at Naples with reduced coveram AGENDA ITEM !AN 13 2004 Piz. So CONFORMING (YES)(NO) — TOWER SITE SHARED USE PLAN (TSP) AVAILABLE (YES)(NO) ZONING: AG For Official Use Only FOR: Pinnacle Towers Inc. TSP PLAN NO. 1. This plan (is)(is not) associated with any tower shared use plan(s). If associated, the Tower Shared Use Plan(s) is /are number(s) 2. Zoning classification of tower site is: agriculture. 3. This tower site (is)(is not) owned by a government. This tower site (is)(is not) perpetually unavailable. 4. This tower site is a (permitted)(conditional) use. 5. This tower site (is)(is not) an essential service conditional use site. 6. The effective date of the original acceptance of this plan by Collier County is N /A. This plan has been amended as follows: (List all pages amended after original execution and acceptance: 7. This tower site (is)(is not) a non - conforming land use. 8. The size (acreage) of the subject site is: 14.55 acres. 9. Location of tower site: Street address is: 305 T Longitude /Latitude of tower site is: 26 -03 -11.32 1081-42-10.40. CU- 2003 -AR -4524 PROJECT #2003060041 DATE: 7/31/03 MIKE BOSI COMPANION ITEM TO VA- 2003- AR4525 AGENDA ITEM� /7 JAN 13 2004 P9. 167 �- Legal Description of site: A tract of land in the, Southwest 1/4 of Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being all of certain tracts described in Official Records Book 165, Pages 54 and 56 of the deed records of said Collier County, Florida. Said tract of land being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwest comer of said Section 3; thence along the West line of said Section 3 North 00 000'15" West, 920.69 feet to a concrete monument found at the Northwest comer of a certain tract of land described as "General TV Tract" in said Official Records Book 165, Page 54; thence along the Northerly line of said "General TV Tract" and parallel with the South line of said Section 3, South 89 °52'30" East, 799.84 feet to a concrete monument found for the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along the Easterly line of the land described in said Official Records Book 165, Pages 54 and 56, South 00'00'15" East, 604.76 feet to an iron pin set in the Northerly right - of -way line of Tower Road for the Southeast corner of tract herein described; thence along said Northerly right -of -way line, the following five (5) courses: (1) South 75 °26'40" West, 21.01 feet to an iron pin set; (2) along a curve, concave to the Southeast whose elements are: central angle of 59 °20'09 ", radius of 105.00 feet, arc length of 108.74 feet and a chord that bears South 45 144'36" West, 103.94 feet to an iron pin set; (3) South 16 °04'49" West, 183.34 feet to an iron pin set; (4) along a curve, concave to the Northwest, whose elements are: central angle of 74 °04'31 ", radius of 45.00 feet, arc length of 58.18 feet and a chord that bears South 53 °10'20" West, 54.21 feet to an iron pin set; (5) North 89048'15" West, 341.90 feet to a concrete monument found at the Southwest corner of a certain Parcel "A" described in said Official Records Book 165, Page 55; thence along the Westerly line of said Parcel "A ", North 00 °03'32" West, 178.01 feet to an iron pin set at the Northwest corner of said Parcel "A ", being also in the Southerly line of said "General TV Tract "; thence along said Southerly line North 89 °47'21" West 268.79 feet to a concrete monument found at the Southwest corder of said "General TV Tract ", also being in the West line of said Section 3, being also the Southwest corner of said tract herein described; thence along said Section line, being also the Westerly line of said "General TV Tract ", North 00 °00'15" West, 712.23 feet to a concrete monument found at the Northwest corner of said "General TV Tract ", being also the Northwest corner of the tract herein described; thence along the Northerly line of said "General TV Tract" and parallel with the South line of said Section 3, South 89 052'30" East, 799.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. JAN 13 K 4 Pg. 10. Site Survey. Provide a boundary survey, signed and sealed by a professional surveyor, showing the location and dimensions of all property lines, existing streets or roads, easements, rights -of -ways, areas dedicated to the public, existing buildings, towers and /or accessory facilities. ] I . Name(s) of all owner(s) of the tower site: List the names of each and every Co -owner of the tower site. If the tower site is co -owned by two or more owners, or any individual entities, the full name of each co -owner individual or entity must be specified in full. Add an addendum if needed. Pinnacle Towers Inc. a Delaware Corporation. Contact Person: Keith Drucker Vice President of Operations List the name of the individual(s) associated with owners that County Staff can contact to administer the Plan. Keith Drucker Steve Smith Mike DeBoer. Karin Jackson Brett Bugpeln Scot Lloyd, Mike Ball, Stephen Crawford. The following individual or individuals are hereby authorized by owner(s) to file amendments to this plan: Keith Drucker, Steve Smith, Mike DeBoer, Karin Jackson, Brett Buggeln, Scot Lloyd, Mike Ball, Stephen Crawford. 12. Phone Nur: -er(s) of Owner•(s): 941- 364 -SSS6. 13. Tower Site Limitations. List site limitations or constraints if any, that may limit or prohibit the construction of additional towers, tower sites, buildings, and accessory facilities. All such alleged limitations or constraints must be approved by the County. There is an existing tower on the same parcel owned by Pinnacle Towers Inc. 14. Site Plan. Each Tower Site Plan shall include a copy of the appro : ed an�?!er a.Y,P„dPd Conditional Use Site Plan and the approved and/or amended Site Development Plan for the subject site. Elimination of the Conditional I ` qit° Plan and/or Site Development Plan as required shall result in a disapproval of the plan. 15. Miscellaneous Relevant Information: This 14 acre site has a 524 foot tower existing at this site. See attached listing for currently mounted antennas on towers. Collocation opportunities shall be verified through structural analyses to determine availability. AGENDA No. JAN 13 7004 n =-- CERTIFICATION BY OWNERS It is hereby stipulated to Collier County that the persons signing this shared use agreement have full power and authority to execute this plan on behalf of the owner(s). It is hereby stipulated and agreed that this plan is and shall be binding on any and all successors or assigns of the tower site owner(s). It is agreed that if the o\\ ncr(s) sell or otherwise transfer ownership or leasehold interest or assignment of any lease by any tenant of the subject tower site and /or accessory buildings and facilities, that all successor owner(s) or assignee(s) shall be required by the owner(s) to become signatories to this shared use plan by addendum hereto. It is further agreed that no additional tower site, accessory building and/or facility shall be added to this tower site except in accord with this shared use plan as then amended. It is agreed that the owner(s) will promptly reply to all inquiries from others regarding possible use of the subject tower site, will negotiate in good faith to accommodate the needs of the inquiring person, and will otherwise comply with all provisions of Section 2.6.35 of the Land Development Code, the Collier County Communications Tower Ordinance, as then amended. SIGNATURE Blocks Signature of Property Owner re*-guggeK .director of Real Estate and Collocation Pinnacle Towers Inc. AGENDA ITEM NO. JAN 13 Zuo4 Pg. �I J G1 J m 0 0 47 ar 0 — U ~ Q m N Q C 67 cn 'a m .,.i Z C1 3 0 3 a r r d J C J 2 2 0 O f u Y LL X r m U t 01 3 a Ly 01 C J Q c E z a N J M 0 O C r � O N A r N N r L O > f�' J 0 v < � E O L V Fes. L L rj rj Ei Sj L L L.... p p v O O v O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O S ° O c0 O O W O Q O O) O Ol p N M N O> M -W 9 N n S S S S S S S O O S S S IT! O O Obi O t� S � Ol rl V7 Ol f7 N Of Ol � 01 N 1'^l V N t7 O O� Ol O> Qf m m m m o m o '2 co ao co w m co co 0 0 0 co m y 0 0 0 O O Q Z O X X �C O E O 0 E O Z °o O 0' W N N 2 O a Z O X X �C O E ° E 0 Z °o O U rn W V A A Z O� N O^ 12 O < < < V < Q < Q V (3 zi 3 v v U v v 0 0 0 U U U U z z z z z z d m n c a N T CL mi �2 tD n N N N N N a E r W W W W W W O O O r` N pp m v o O d N y Q GG N O r t° m O O N !") rn O N M o O N lh m Z a O c"J rn ai ° O N h rn O O N ('� o P Q V) L) a 3 aGi Q N U a 3 ai a U) U a 3 ai Q U a 3 ci Q U a Q V) :..) a° a3i N m m a O) a Q M O1 a Q M Ol a Q M Ol a Q M Ql a C M a 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 o 0 O 0 0 °� ,D 0 0 ° ,$ 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Cl o 0 0 S ° o 0 ° 0 0 e° 0 0 °v 0 0 °v 0 0 °v 0 0 S Cl o 0 S Cl S S 0 o 0 o 0 O 0 0 S 0 O 0 0 g O 0 0 I 0 N 0 N 0 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N LL 'O LL O J J N N N V) V) V) V) N V) C J io �ry5 o+ S C m N N N r a J 3 c a m ~ a J a N U J V) V) W W E z Z U J v) V) W W a w g z Z U J cn V) W J W cr w g z Z U J co V) W J W Of g z Z U J 0 V) W J W w 7 z Z U J cn V) W J W cr g 7 Z U J w 0 W J W cz g Z U J U') V) W J W EX = Z U J w V) W J W cr g Z: U J co (n W J W Of cr g :D Z U J (n C/) W J W Of cc g => Z U J N V) W J W rr w g O Z U J V) W J W cr Z Z O z n 0 U J W Z O Z D 0 U J H W Z O z m 0 U J W Z O F- Z 0 0 U J W Z O r Z g 0 U J N W Z O r z 0 U J W W (3 zi 3 v v U v v 0 0 0 U U U U z z z z z z d m n c a N T CL mi �2 tD n N N N N N a AGENDA ITEF. ° 11 a JAN 13 2x34 Pg. J �_ a a a a a a a a AGENDA ITEF. ° 11 a JAN 13 2x34 Pg. J �_ J N d J LL co O 3 r d 0 U ~ Q R N Q C C � Z L d 3 L0 r t O) 0 O L �f J C O F� 0 0 W LL `... N U L 3 c a L d J Q wi c c d a`y�I D E 2 m N w J M O O � w C T H T O H Q w V! ,,^^ H E W fl a f J c0 t0 l0. I v a i N O a a a a a a O O O O O O O °o °o S °o °o °o o° S S o° S S �' °o °o °o °o °o o° ° S S S ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0° o ,o o m o �n Oo °o S °o• o °o �� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rn o rn N o ONt O O O Obi G O O '.j vj pj yj Oj �+j A N O � O 10 O CO Of CO O) CO O� CD O� aD Of aOD COO a0 8 8 pp S pK N f7 N i7 V O ppg p pp S O O O S S O O S S O O O S $ O vOj S O S S S S 8 O g O CD dpi rn n CI N py pA 48 8 O) 01 O� 01 Of O) 01 � pf 01 Qt Q1 f7 N OOi N O) 1'7 l0 ^ N C] �j O) Of Qf 0>' 01 O N eh N [n < O) O) O) A A A O a0 t9 CD 10 O N O �N l 7 O � C) p U.J LU W) LU ui uj _; N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 E= E o rn tpn ui .n N CL Q N CL Q N CL m p co O m O m O m O m O p O m O m O Q (NJ Q U U O O Q O 2 O 8 O R O R O 9 O 2 O `a3 CI) C7 00 VS U N U O S O S O S ao S aD S CO CD C> O Cp S a0 S < O O d O O .- N Z:! O O N O �p0 CD S C) O O Z M °o c, N O O Z r7 S O N O O Z f') °o O N O O Z f'7 °o O N O O Z f7 o O N O Q Z th °o O N O O Z i"') S O N O O Z C7 S O N OU O Z t7 o O N O Z M g O N O Z o o O N O p� �"I MO o O N O Z' ,�.� S O N O Z O o O N O Z Z O 0 •A- O O N N O O rn (!1 N C C C C C C L) [n A N R a O O N fn U) U w N U co W r v C U w U w w CL a a o o W m ai X z X z X z S 9 a O W a a a s N C T O Or C V of rn N O) rn N AGENDTM W p fi o N �� CJ �, O) ^ O) o Q1 � A p 411 CL a a a a Q- a a a !AN a a 13 2004 �� Pg. Wr i LL (n E A y 0 mood m o �U~ Q C N Q C G1 (nCLA L d LLO 1- L Q1 3 0 0 f c r c v J C O T c 0 0 g LL W X H A U L O) 3 L J III 4 c d Q I E Z O N A J M O O N c r N r �$ w H N � •.� E L O ° F... d J r C) °o Cl Co ° n° ^o m m 2 m m m O 8O O pO O CO p 00 O p O O O O O O ti N �A O N V VO"1 Ci Of ON1 QNf Obi V d� c O m Qo m CL a a t0 rn rn rn N Zn Co ;, m r N a 0 � v O O Z 2 o � O O a U c w m Z 0 0 a es AGENDA ITEM , NO. =� JAN 13 2004 Q O) N oo 0 o 0 d t 7 � as c r- m E C oci v V-1 Qn" CD T C c0.1 I Ya A v C v c a lai� rr � a o rn rn U N to w9 � 0 L) CL a C) Q Q r, Cl. tp �9 o c Q Vm1 L V U U Z co w U �- 8 O O 00 O cl t0 Cl l00 K O Z Z 2 Z aa'o a°fo etOi Oc ° Cl °O o °o o ° o o p N O O N O O p O O O O O O O U U U J U U En U IL a a d s y cQ b 0 b A a a 3 LL LL LL CL a a t0 rn rn rn N Zn Co ;, m r N a 0 � v O O Z 2 o � O O a U c w m Z 0 0 a es AGENDA ITEM , NO. =� JAN 13 2004 Q O) N oo 0 o 0 d t 7 � as c r- m E C oci v V-1 Qn" CD T C c0.1 I Ya A v C v c a lai� rr � a f J V/ d J �J U- fn C 61 0 CL 0 a O —Z tw Q C d Q C V) Z L d 3 `O r L D7 i 7 0 L G V J C 7 O f G T r! c 0 �I vl d LL x r A U t O� 3 Q L C J Q A C d Q D E Z d N A I J O O � N C r Im- r O r H cn � E L J < Q d $ Q $ 6 N o v v o O cn <n in 0 0 0 0 rn m 0 0 g o O> � u7 V9 o g PLO � I'•) � N N rnp O 0 N N Q GLJ J J J o � N N O O O 8 O O O p O Q V O < o g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N O O O O O O � C) U U _T _T m a� c 'c _U Om cAQ cc �pp 0 U V (g U `O m to N (n !n LL LL �o� goo o a a a a a ACEMA ITEM .IAN 13 2004 � �g Pei•�— N N b '3GN a°N T K1 A >y y O o E �Z� CL wM d 10 July 2003 Mr. Chris Haynes Construction Manager Pinnacle Towers, Inc. 301 N. Cattleman Road Suite 300 Sarasota, Florida 34232 CU- 2003- AR4524 PROJECT #2003060041 DATE: 7/31/03 MIKE BOSI COMPANION ITEM TO VA- 2003- AR4525 Ref: Naples Florida (Pinnacle Site Number 0117 -003) Annual Inspection Report (FCC Number 1030232) 305 Tower Road Naples, Florida Dear Mr. Chris Haynes Per your request FDH has completed an annual inspection of the aforementioned tower. The inspection procedures were in accordance with current TIA/EIA Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures (Annex E: Tower Maintenance and Inspection procedures). The current Standard is TIA/EIA- 222 -F, dated June 1996. The attached report indicates that the following deficiencies need to be addr sed to bring the tower into compliance with current TIA/EIA, Annex E, Standards: 1. The corroded base bolts and approximately 20 — 30% of the flange bolts need to be replaced. 2. The top level beacon has two broken red filters and one broken beacon bulb. 3. The twist and out -of -plumb measurements indicate that the tower is not within the specified TIAIEIA tolerances. 4. The guy tensions vary between 5.79% and 12.96% of breaking strength. The acceptable TIA/EIA tolerances are between 8 — 15% of the specified breaking strength. It is the opinion c. '-' -lff Engineers at FDH Engineering that the bent diagonal members will not compromise the 'al integrity of the tower. FDH therefore will not address the bent members in our scope of work below. FDH, Inc., has been contracted by Pinnace Towers, Inc., to address the deficiencies mentioned above. Our anticipated start date is Tuesday, 15 July 2003. Our scope of work is as follows: 1. Supply and replace all flange bolts /nuts on tower. Bolts will be galvanized with a 2. 3. 4. 5. grade of A -325. Fix base bolts/nuts per Engineers specifications. Re -lamp the total tower and replace the red inserts on the top beacon. Correct the guy tensions to 10% of the published breaking strength Engineers recommendations. Adjust the twist and out-of -plumb measurements to speci specifications. A per pe. / ■NG. Pinnacle Towers, Inc- 10 July 2003 Once the above issues have been properly addressed the tower will be in compliance with TIA /EIA specifications. We anticipate the above project to be completed within four to five days once it is started. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this information. Please give me a call if you have any questions. I can be reached at (919) - 755 -1012. Sinc Richard L. Cullum Director of Field Services, General Contractor Attachments: Annual Inspection Report JAN 13 2004 Pg. (0 v Pinnacle Tower Site — 0117 — 003 FCC # 1030232 Annual Inspection Report 305 Tower Road Naples, Florida I. Tower Condition A. Members 1. Bent members - Two diagonals are slightly bent. One at the base and near the top of tower. See photographs 2 and 3. 2. Loose members - The horizontal, due to a tower modification, on AB face near the bottom of tower is not attached on one side due to interference with coax. 3. Missing Members - None noted. 4. Climbing facilities, platforms, catwalks - all secure - Climbing members welded with no problems noted. 5. Loose and/or missing bolts - None noted except those mentioned in I,A,2 above. B. Finish 1. Paint condition - Flaking near top of tower. 2. Rust and/or corrosion conditions - One base nut rusted and miscellaneous bolts and diagonals rusted throughout tower. See photographs 4, 34 — 47, and 48 -53. 3. FAA or ICAO color marking conditions - Seven bands are painted and within FAA standards. 4. Water collection in members — One weep hole was clogged. When unclogged a small amount of water came out of the tower leg. The tower leg didn't show any visible signs of damage. C. Lighting 1 2 3 4 5 6 Conduit, junction boxes, and fasteners weather tight and secure - No problems noted. Drains and vents open - No problems noted. Wiring condition - No problem noted. Controllers functioning a. Flasher - No problem noted. b. Photo control - No problems noted. c. Alarms - No problems noted. Light lenses - Top beacon has a broken red filter. See photograph 54 - 57 (mid — level beacons) and 58 — 59 (top beacon). Bulb condition - Top beacon has one broken bulb. See photograp t3A IT rmm JAN 13 2304 pt. (0 1 D. Grounding 1. Connections checked and secure - No problems noted. See photograph 5. 2. Corrosion - None noted. 3. Lightning protection secure -Climber indicated that the tower is missing a lighting rod. E. Tower base conditions 1. Ground conditions a. Settlements or movements - None noted. See photograph 15 and 20. b. Erosion - None noted. c. Site condition (standing water, drainage, trees) - Standing water around anchors. See photographs 10 - 14, 21 - 33 and 60 - 62. 2. Base condition a. Nuts and lock nuts - Leg A nut rusted b. Grout condition - None noted 3. Concrete Condition a. Cracking, spalling, or splitting - No problems noted. b. Chipped or broken concrete- No problems noted. c. Honeycombing - None noted. d. Low spots to collect moisture - None noted. e. Anchor -bolt corrosion - None noted.. F. Tower Alignment 1. Tower plumb and twist. At 95° in 5 -10mph winds. Observed Mast Data Calculated Twist Calculated Out -of- Plumb Mast Elev. (Feet) A (Inches) D1 (inches) D2 (inches) D3 (inches) D (Inches) E A (Deg -) x (inches) Y (inches) r (inc hes 61.5 36.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121.5 36.00 1.00 0.00 150 0.83 0.04 2.30 -0.87 0.17 0.88 189.5 36.00 1.50 1.50 4.50 2.50 0.12 6.91 -1.73 -1.00 2.00 245.5 36.00 0.00 4.50 7.00 _ 3.83 0.16 10.63 -1.44 -3.83 4.10 313.5 36.00 2.00 5.00 4.00 3.67 0.18 10.16 0.58 -1.67 1.76 383 1 36.00 1 3.50 1 4.00 1 0.00 2.50 0.12 6.91 2.31 1.00 2.52 450 1 36.00 3.00 2.00 1 1.00 2.00 0.10 5.52 1 0.58 1 1.00 1 1.15 520 1 36.00 1.50 0.00 1 0.50 0.67 0.03 1.84 1 -0.29 1 0.83 1 0.88 AGENDA JAN 13 2004 Pe. _ &a G. Anchors I . Settlement, movement or earth cracks - None noted. 2. Backfill heaped over concrete for water shedding - No problems noted. 3. Anchor rod condition below earth - No problems noted. 4. Corrosion control measures - No problems noted. 5. Grounding - No problems noted. 6. Anchor head clear of earth - No problems noted. H. Tower Guys 1. Strand a. Condition - no problems noted. 2. Guy Hardware a. Turnbuckles secure and safety properly applied - no problems noted. b. Cable thimbles properly in place (if required) - none noted. c. Cable connectors i. Cable clamps applied properly and bolts tight ii. Preformed wraps properly applied, fully wrapped, and sleeve in place -leg c top 2 wires were not fully wrapped (problem corrected). See photograph 69 and 70. 3. Guy Tension Guy Guy Tension at anchor Obs) Breaking % of Breaking at anchor Level Size Leg A Leg B Leg C strength Leg A Leg B Leg C 5/8 3489.2773 3405.663 2625.95 42400 8.23% 8.03% 6.19% 3114 4757.1675 6066.992 4860.365 58300 8.16% 10.41% 8.34% 3 3;4 3469.4756 3817.671 4771.588 58300 5.95°% 6.55°% 8.18°% 4R 518 4961.8767 2874.997 2694.522 42400 11.70°% 6.78°% 6.36°% 4 +._ 5 -8 2144.6475 3044.032 2393.475 42400 5.06°% 7.18°% 5.65°% 5 5;8 2851.0269 2772.33 3107.418 42400 6.72°% 6.54°% 7.33°% 61 '!4 3917.6359 7553.036 5544.657 58300 6.72°% 12.96°% 9.51% 14 5085.5108 3377.685 4547.911 58300 8.72°% 5.79°% 7.80°% 8 i4 3933.4685 4688.844 4255.251 58300 6.75°% 8.04°% 7.30°% II, Antennas and Mounts A. Antenna Mounts and Antennas 1. Members(mounting and stabilizing) a. Bent, broken, or cracked. - No problems noted. b. Loose - No problems noted. c. Missing - No problems noted. JAN 1 3 2004 Pg. 6 3 -- d. Loose and/or missing bolts - None noted. 2. Adjustments secure and locked - No problems noted. 3. Elements a. Bent, broken, cracked or bullet damaged - No problems noted b. Loose - No problems noted. c. Missing - None noted. d. Loose and/or missing fasteners - None noted. 4. Corrosion condition - None noted. 5. Radomes and/or cover conditions - No problems noted B. Feedlines (waveguide, cock, etc) 1. Hangers and supports a. Condition - No problems noted. b. Quality - No problems noted. c. Corrosion condition - None noted. 2. Flanges and seals (check integrity) - No problems noted 3. Line Condition a. Dents - None noted. b. Abrasions - None noted. c. Holes - None noted. d. Leaks - None noted. e. Jacket condition - No problems noted. 4. Grounds a. Top ground strap bonded both ends - No problems noted. b. Bottom ground strap bonded both ends - No problems noted. 5. Feedline support (ice shields) a. Properly attached - No problems noted. See photographs 6 - 9. b. Loose and/or missing bolts - None noted. c. Members straight and undamaged - No problems noted. AGENDA ITEM /) RX JAN 13 2004 �• tP T III. Photo Log 1 Site sign 2,3 Bent Diagonals 4 Rusty base bolt 5 Base grounding 6 AB Face 7,8 BC Face 9 CA Face 10,13,60 Leg A Anchor path 11,1 4,61 —Leg B Anchor path 12,62 Leg C Anchor path 15,20 Tower base foundation 21 Leg A Inner Anchor 22,23 Leg A Middle Anchor 24 Leg A Outer Anchor 25 Leg B Inner Anchor 26,27 Leg B Middle Anchor 28 Leg B Outer Anchor 29 Leg C Inner Anchor 30,31 Leg C Middle Anchor —T273-3–Leg C Outer Anchor 34 -47 –Rusty leg bolt 48 -53 Rust on Diagonals 54 -57 Mid - Beacons 58 -59 Top Beacon 63 -68 Tower Pics 69 Outer anchor leg C before .fixing re -forms 70 Outer anchor leg C after fixing re -forms AGENDA AN 13 2004 p. 6 6'*- 400P P I" N A C L. FE- Towers Inc CU-2003-AR-4524 PROJECT #2003060041 July 7, 2003 DATE: 7/31/03 MIKE BOSI Collier County Government COMPANION ITEM TO VA- 2003- AR-4525 Community Development & Environmental Services Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Pinnacle Towers Inc. new 700' guyed tower, Naples, Florida.(0117 -004) To Whom It May Concern: I am writing this letter in reference to your request to provide our opinion of the expected mode of collapse for the new 700' guyed lattice steel -type communications tower to be located in Collier County (Naples), FL. The tower is designed in strict accordance with the Electronics Industry Association Standard EIA/T1A- 222 -F, 1996 standard and the FBC. Due to the safety factors incorporated into the design standard, we would not expect the tower to fail the moment that the designed wind speed has been exceeded. Although it is extremely rare for a guyed tower to collapse, most failures occur during catastrophic natural disasters such as hurricanes or tornadoes in which total devastation to the surrounding area would also occur. Because of the various levels of guy cables designed to support the towers, it is virtually impossible for the tower to fall in a straight line like a tree might. The expected mode of collapse would be upon itself in a an accordance type fashion with the majority of the debris contained within the tower's anchor radius. The site will contain two towers when the new tower is constructed. It should be noted that if either of the towers collapsed, :! ; ",:' „--stained within the provided parcel of land. Since there are many different factors, which will affect the failure of a communication tower, we would like to point out that the mode of tower failure mentioned above is just an estimate. Professional engineers design all towers that are installed by Pinnacle Towers Inc., with experience in the communications industry. We trust that this information confirms to you that towers are designed to survive rather than collapse. Please feel free to contact us if you should have any questions or require further information. PINNACLE TOWERS INC. Michael T. PeBoer, P.E. Senior Engineer AGENDA 1Tb; . 7/�;/j No.- ►� nn JAN 13 2uu4 301 North Cattlemen Road Sarasota Florida 34231 888 7483482 941 364 8886 fax 941 364 8761 pinnacletowers.com pg. 6 !<C1 July 8, 2003 Attn: Ms. Karin Jackson PINNACLE TOWER 301 N Cattlemen Rd. Sarasota, FL 34232 Broadcast Components Inc. 3455 Table Mesa Dr. Unit H182 Boulder, CO 80305 Voice: 1 -800 -584 -8839 Fax: 1- 800 -584 -3585 Email: bci- towers @attbi.com CU-2003-AR-4524 PROJECT #2003060041 DATE: 7/31/03 MIKE BOSI COMPANION ITEM TO VA- 2003- AR4525 Re: Review of Guy Wire interference Issues between the Existing and Proposed Tower at Naples FL (Site No. 0117 -004) Dear Ms. Jackson, Further to y(,,--r request of May 22, 2003, we have completed the review of the proposed location of the 700 1 . Sabre model 4400 SRWD guyed tower including the guy anchor locations and guy elevations at Naples, FL, to determine whether there will be any interference issues with the existing 512 ft. guyed tower. Based on our results as outlined in the attached table labelled, "Minimum Calculated Gaps Between Existing and Proposed Guy Wires" in Appendix A, the only interference issues will be between the guy wires at 232 ft. elevation on the proposed tower and 244 ft. elevation on the existing tower at Location D (see attached CAD profile in Appendix A for details). Here, the guy wires have a minimum gap of approximately 0.1 ft. To avoid interference issues, we would recommend moving the proposed guy elevation at 232 ft. up or down 5 ft. in height to allow adequate clearance. Note: by moving this guy elevation up, (1) one proposed guy wire will be located above the existing guy wires at Location D. Please note that by comparing guy elevation gaps with and without sag (change in slope of guy wire due to a combination of self weight, guy wire length and tension), the minimum gaps reported in the attached table will be slightly conservative (within 1 to 2 ft. in elevation) to account for changes in guy tension due to varying wind directions. The existing guy path taken into consideration is oriented 120° clockwise from the proposed. AGENDAI Mao. JAN 11 2004 P9. 6 Since we did not visit the tower site to complete this review, the new tower was assumed to be located 30 ft. South and 20 ft. West of the existing tower per your e -mail of May 29, 2003; the proposed tower will be installed per Sabre's proposal of June 25, 2003 with the exception of the guy elevation at 232 ft. to be relocated up or down 5 ft. in height; a new middle anchor will be installed at 300 ft. radius from the existing tower supporting existing guy elevations 3 through 6 and the ground level is relatively flat. To illustrate how the (2) towers interact together, a 3 dimensional elevation profile of the towers has been produced using SAP2000, a finite element program, and can also be found in Appendix A. We trust you find this satisfactory. Please do not hesitate to call if you should have any questions or concerns. Best Regards, /_:!Z� Broadcast Components Inc. Brad Cook, PE AGENDA I_ JAN 13 2CU`4 pg. 6 9 APPENDIX A AGENDA ITEM JAN 13 2004 Pl.-2�E- SAP2000 7/8/03 17:47:30 AGEMA ITEM SAN 13 2004 SAP2000 v8.1.1 - File:existingti - 3 -D View -Kip, in, F Units r��j N W 3 'D V W N O CL O cc a 0 Z �Q V Z p in X W Z W 2W r W m cn a �Q V 0 W U J Q U c7 G Z Q L:J 0 F- 0 w 0 CL 0 cc M cc w 0 H 0 Z X W M AN 13 20PA a N m N C+ © Of r n N e N O N n ON N N m Z w V1 N Q tm'1 c7 N N N U j A t'1 �D N m 1n n 01 10 1n O tD m m O n n Vf 1D M 0 Cf m N O N e r l7 O m O 1O ^ Q N m T N N v 0 Z 00 tp u1 8 M :: N- N N N N Q m N e N O 0 N N N N Z Ti— 0 m 0 n ry ^ n 10 n N Oy t7 t •I V0I t7 N Ci 1n W C N 1D N N m tO 0 m O > 0 N R N N N ^ N m ^ m Z W cm C, C-4 tp cp n nnn 0000 m m m m Q VO N >n C fn O O Ot O O+ 01 N b n T L ol S S O O NO a s N 100 '3 pi P 00 n 10 to N N n n n n m mm m 1•> f•1 0 0 0 000 Q e N N m m A Q N 0 m 00 00 O0 10 ID e 1D tD m m m m t'f to 0 0 a Np V0) N N N I'D Z fm') a Sp S f VpO1 ton V0f 8 S SmS 8mSm8$ O SSB Smm S >.� » O o m m w (D alpp t -M - cm Q N 10 n Qf m [•I 01 m y CQ'), S S C 1n f0'I 0 J 0 C O ' A U U LL U LL Q m 0 W Q m 0 W U LL J U LL 8 88 88. 888' 8580 $0 8 88 n n n N N nrNin cN•� 1'11'>c'l (`� � � � W N 1n a (7 f7 CJ 0 N N N N N N N N Oi n Z n N m N n N m Z 0 m N Q tD I QI 1l1 N m Qi 001 O N 1O ^ t0 N n r n N N cla m0 r (n Z th Qf h m C1 m N t7 0 N (� N N N N O C') N N N N N ^ Z W Q e O ^ N N l7 'N mn v1a o1�u+m r•1- 1D Inn mcq rnm o U nv a a 1n� a Nn Q v G N1ncv m c co N o .; ac a s a G mZ X V n N N N N N N (' N N N N n m 0 ^ V a [7 0 (� :.7 zW E E E E E E E E o � o m N E m 3 D1.. 7 mn c->nnW E �nn10 N Q E cv •- � E v1pi. 3 O N N N N E e n E N O _E N n Q _E n 1D _E C C ^�N C m� C ^ >£L W 3 A V 7 O v CO _ Q tD O N m < r- v ">. N m Q O •- e N L m cD m c7 t'] n 01 ^ m Q 01 > O m Z N N W n n m n n n n n n O O O LL n o 0 0 o e m g cm C N m OJ N N O 01 A Qf N T Of 01 D1 �0 �0 Vl Q 9 1D 1C N N v LL e Q Q e u'Y N �3 = 0 0 Os OO - mm e mmmm > mm mm e t O e0 m m cc w Imn lmn N N W O 0000 1n 1 In n N IOn N N W N N tND JV Z M m O 0 O1 f o NN a p p p p b T D C t 41 Q n n C7 SS 'm S S N U Q a e og °$ °o °wee O CL ¢�`�vm �? m �v m O Q m N u_ N N J 0 Q (� C O 'u U ULL ULL Q210 W a: O W ULL LL J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g$ 00 x$ 0 0 0 $ 4 Z 0 0 0 e 0 0 m m 0 m m Q e v W v a Q v W 0 N W N N O t7 0 00 00 N N N N M AN 13 20PA a G a b re Communications Corporation Guyed and Self - Supporting Towers. Monopoles. HF Mien Syslems and Turnkey Inslallsuons July 11, 2003 Pinnacle Towers, Inc. 301 North Cattleman Road, Suite 300 Sarasota, FL 34232 Attn: Mr. Steve Smith (941) 364 -8886 Dear Mr. Smith: CU- 2003 -AR -4524 PROJECT #2003060041 DATE: 7/31/03 MIKE BOSI COMPANIOP4 ITEM TO VA- 2003 -AR -4525 Per your recent request, please find following our revised quotation for a 700' Sabre Model 4400 SRAM guyed tower. If you have any questions or require further information, please feel free to contact me at (800) 369 -6690 extension 219 or the Senior Estimator, Pam Washburn, at extension 161. Sincerely, SABRE COMMUNICATIONS Brian D. New National Sales Manager Enclosure: Per Above BDN: pw AGENDA In. I JAN 13 2004 2101 Murray Street - P.O. Box 658 - Sioux City, IA 51102 -0658 - 712.258.6690 - Fax 712.279 814 Pg. 7a ^a b re Communications Corporation Guyed and Self- Supponlnp Towers, Monopoles, HF Antenna Systerra and Turnkey InstallSdOrd ' PROPOSAL Prepared for: Pinnacle Towers, Inc. Proposal No.: 04- 0278- BDN-R4 301 North Cattleman Road, Suite 300 Date: 07111103 Page 1 of 4 Sarasota, FL 34232 Reference: 700' 4400 SRWD/Naples, Florida Attn: Mr. Steve Smith FOB: Destination Payment Terms: Net 30 SABRE MODEL 4400 SRWL GUYED TOWER Quantity of one (1) 700' Sabre Model 4400 SRWD guyed tower. The tower will be triangular in design Y- 8" on a face and consist of all solid welded 20' sections. Tower will have two (2) anchors in each direction, 120' apart, with a 60% level guy radius. The northeast inner anchor will have a 278' level guy radius. The tower will be designed for a basic wind speed of 120 mph (140 mph Florida Building Code - 3 second gust) with 0" radial ice in accordance with ANSUEIA / rIA- 222 -F -1996. The tower will be designed to support the following equipment: JAN. 131 1-004 21o1 Murray Stree, - P.O. Box 658 - Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 - 712.238.8890 - Fax 712.279.0814 P ,.3 off ANTENNA MODEL RADOME ELEVATION TX. LINE FREQUENCY AZIMUTH TO ANTENNA MOUNT kNTENN A PROVIDED MOUNT NUMBER YES NO C.O.R. S17-E& TYPE NORTH YES NO X i (QTY) (1) ADD090 -2 X 700' (2) NIA Unknown Leg P' :nt Antenna (1) SRL 335 -2 X 675' 2 1/4" (1) NIA L`nknowrt (1} 2' X 2 Dinole Antenna X 675' 2 1/4" (1) N/A unknown Standoff (1) 2' X 3 (1) SRL 235 -2 2 1 /4" Standoff 4 Dipole Antenna (!) SRL 235 2 X 640' (1) N/A Unknown (1) 2' X Dipole Antenna X 600' 2 1/4" (1) N/A Unknown Standoff Leg Mount X 5 (1) 12 Bay Standard FM Antenna (6) 10' X 500' 4" (6) N/A Unknown (3) 3' X 6 4" Sidearms Omni Antennas 8' H.P. Dish X 350' (1) 6 GHz UnknowTt (1) 4 % O.D. X 7 (1) EW63 Dish Mount 8 (1) 8' H.P. Dish X 340' (1) 6 GHz Cn own (1) 4' /i" O.D. X EW63 Dish Mount (I) 8' H.P. Dish X 310' (1) 6 GHz Unlrnown (1) 4'h" O.D. X 9 EW63 Dish Mount 10 (I) 8' H.P. Dish X 300' (1) 6 GHz Unimown (Dt h %ORD. X EW63 11 (4) PCSNHA- 03320 -01)G X 249' (8) N/A Unknown 10' lT -Boom X Panel .Antennas (4) ASP -2895 X ' 1 5/8" (4) 1 5/8" NIA Unknown Sector Mount 10' 1T -Boom Sector Mount X 12 13 Panel Antennas (4) DB950G85E -M X ' F220. (4) N/A Unknown l0' iT -Boom X Panel Antennas (4) ASP -2896 X 1 5/8" (4) 1 5/8" N/A Unknown Sector Mount 10' IT -Boom Sector Mount X 14 Panel Antennas (4) PCSA 065 -19-0 X 175' (4) N/A Unknown I0' IT -Boom Sector Mount X 15 Panel Antennas 3 Bay Standard FM X 141' 1 5/8" N/A Unknown Leg Mount X 16 (1) Antenna :i(:51/)8 " JAN. 131 1-004 21o1 Murray Stree, - P.O. Box 658 - Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 - 712.238.8890 - Fax 712.279.0814 P ,.3 off o abre Communications Corporation Guyed and Self-Supporting Tower& Morwpoles, , HF Mtenna Systerru and Turnkey Installations PROPOSAL Prepared for: Pinnacle Towers, Inc. Proposal No.: 04- 0278- BDN -R4 301 North Cattleman Road, Suite 300 Date: 07/11/03 Page 2 of 4 Sarasota, FL 34232 Reference: 700' 4400 SRWD/Naples, Florida Attn: Mr. Steve Smith FOB: Destination Payment Terms: Net 30 ITEMI TOWER MATERIALS ....................................................................................... ............................... $140,962.00 Materials to be provided include: Complete tower steel and hardware Complete guying system Base material and standard deadman anchor arms (see notes) Climbing ladder incorporated into one (1) face Waveguide support ladder incorporated into three (3) faces (to support thirty -six (36) initial lines) Required stabilizers Required beacon mounts Required 40' Nuplaglas rods and hardware Tuf -tug safety cable idt without harness (700) EIA standard grounding with one (1) 4'x 5/8" copper -clad steel lightning rod P.E. certified tower profile and foundation drawings Final erection drawings ITEMHLIGHTING SYSTEM ......................................................................................... ..............................$ 6,080.00 Factory Applied Metalatex Semi -Gloss Paint (see notes) ................................. ............................... $ 8,400.00 One (1) Honeywell (A2) Red beacon light system with stranded wire and conduit designed in accordance with FAA and FCC specifications. LIGHTINGSYSTEM......................................................................................... ..............................$ 18,354.00 Factory Applied Metalatex Semi -Glosq Pant (see notes) ...................... $ 8,400.00 One (1) Honeywell (A2) LED Red light system (2GB31ROOV700 -001) with wire and conduit designed in accordance with FAA and FCC specifications. TOIPER FREIGHT TO COLLIER COUNT Y, FLORIDA ......................................................... ............................... $ 9,102.00 ANCHOR FREIGHT TO COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ....................................................... ............................... $ 2,030.00 OPTIONS: 3' Sidearm ( each) ............................................................................................ ................................ .... $ 239.00 Stiffarm Mounting Assembly (each) .............................................................. ............................... $ 126.00 4 %" O.D. Leg -Type Dish Mount ( each) ............................................................ ............................... $ 150.00 Stiffarm Mounting Assembly (each) .............................................................. ............................... $ 92.00 10' 1T -Boom Sector Mount (each) ..................................................................... ............................... $ 550.00 2101 Murray Street - P.O. Box 658 - Sioux City, IA 51102-0658 - 712.258.6690 Fax 712.279.0a14 AGENDA ITEM JAN 13 2no4 P$.� sabre O Communlcatlons Corporation Guyed and Self- SupporUnp TDw m Monopdes, HF Antenna Systems and Turnkey InstanaDons Prepared for: Pinnacle Towers, Inc. 301 North Cattleman Road, Suite 300 Sarasota, FL 34232 Attn: Mr. Steve Smith PROPOSAL Proposal No.: 04- 0278- BDN -R4 Date: 07/11/03 Page 3 of 4 Reference: 700' 4400 SRNYD/Naples, Florida FOB: Destination Payment Terms: Net 30 NOTES: Terms are Net 30 days after invoice. Invoice will be issued once tower fabrication is complete. If a different paint is requested, additional charges may be incurred. The permit package includes a profile drawing of the structure with member sizes; base plate and anchor details; descriptive notes; structural calculations; a table of supported antennas, mounts and feedlines; and a foundation sketch and calculations (if applicable), This quotation is based on ANSYEIAMA -222 -F and customer provided specifications. Any information not provided by ANSI/ELk/TIA -222 -F or the customer has not been considered. Dimensional information is preliminary only; it may change based on final engineering. All Sabre mounts are designed with mounting pipes the same height as the antennas specified. If different mounting pipe sizes are required at time of order, additional costs may be incurred. If anchors other than our standard deadman anchor arms are required, additional charges will be incurred. Freight charges quoted are for provided materials only. Additional freight charges may be incurred with the order of additional items. All antennas, transmission lines, jumpers, ground kits, hangers, and hardware are to be provided and installed by others. All tower materials will be hot dip galvanized as outlined in ASTM A -123. This proposal does not include any sales, use, excise, contractors or any other taxes not specifically detailed in this proposal. If a customer requests to pick up a tower, a $300.00 per truck charge may apply for dunage and loading. Storage charges of $350.00 per month may apply starting 60 days after original scheduled ship date. Due to the fluctuation in material prices any structure order placed on hold is subject to a price review at the time of its release from hold status. This may cause an increase in price to occur. Due to freight price fluctuations Sabre reserves the right to review all freight pricing prior to accepting any order. The lighting system quoted assumes that there will be an unobstructed view of the beacons in all directions. It is the buyer's responsibility to ensure that the lighting kit quoted meets all Federal, State, T.n .al nrrlinances for tower height and lighting type. dGEtJDI TF JAN 1 J 2004 2101 Murray Street - P.O. Box 658 - Sioux City, IA 51102 -0658 . 712.258.6690 - Pax 712.279.0814 17 - sabre O Communications Corporation 1 Guyed and Selr•Suppo(tnp Towers, Monopoles. HF Antenna Systarrs and Turnkey InslsllaWnf Prepared for: Pinnacle Towers, Inc. 301 North Cattleman Road, Suite 300 Sarasota, FL 34232 tt Mr Steve Smith PROPOSAL Proposal No.: 04- 0278- BDN -R4 Date: 07/11/03 Page 4 of 4 Reference: 700'4400 SRWDfNaples, Florida FOB: Destination Payment Terms: Net 30 A n. Due to material price fluctuations, Sabre reserves the right to review all material pricing prior to accepting any order. Delivery will be approximately 8 to 10 weeks after receipt of required information and contingent upon backlog at the time of order. An additional 2 weeks for factory- applied paint will be required This proposal is based on the terms and conditions proposed above including the attached standard terms and conditions and is subject to our review and final acceptance of your order. No other terms are valid unless signed by an authorized officer of Sabre Communications. Submitted By: Sabre Communications Corporation Brian D. Newberg National Sales Manager Acceptance of Buyer: Please enter our order for the above items in accordance with this proposal. Signature Name (print) Title Purchase Order No. Date 2101 Murray Street . P.O. Box 658 - Sioux City. IA 511024)658 - 712.258.8690 - Fax 712. AGENDA ITE?�� PJc�. JAN 13 2004 Pg. rT abre tp4ftMUrV&Cfaii6aa` 1Corporr.tio� Prepared For: 301NortTowers, attlemlan Road, Suite 300 Sarasota, FL 34232 TOWER PROFILE Proposal No.: 04- 0278- BDN -R4 Page 1 Date: 7/10/2003 Reference: 700' 4400SRW ! Naples, Florida 9' TORQUE ARM 67T NCHOR 'TORQUE ARM TOWER GUYS 607' STABILIZER GUYS QUE ARM 537 Sizes are preliminary and E ARM may change upon final design 120 SSTABILIZER 467' TOWER M TOWER GUYS 397' _ 322' 237' 157' 77' UE A —A [- 128.48 706.02 167.48 1771.97 PLAN AGENDA ITEM 'AN 1 3 2004 a trade Inlorrnation contained herein is the sole property of Sabre CommnIC300tten cotsent of Sabre st;omrurtipbronsd crD0raeo �a Ch. 550 and shall not be re aced, coaled a used in while a pen la any Durpose ..hatsoaw without the prior 2101 Murray Street - P.O. Box 658 - Sioux City, IA 51102 -0658 -Phone 712.258.6690 •Fax 7 2.258 o abre com+*+uaia�tlo+u Coryorstlsn Prepared For Pinnacle Towers, Inc. North Cattleman Road, Suitt Sarasota, FL 34232 WAVEGUIDE LINE ARRANGEMENT Proposal Number. 04- 027"ON -R4 Date: 7/1012003 Reference: 700' 4400SRW / Naples, Flo AGENDA ITEM P40. JAN 13 Zuv'>~ r P9. 7 abre ✓Cortmmunlcations Corporailotl customer: Plnnacle Towers. Inc. Site: Naples, FL 700 ft. Model 4400 SRW Guyed Tower (44 in. face) At 120 mph Wind + 0 in. Ice per ANSIrfIA/EIA- 222 -F -1996. Antenna Loading per Page 1 PRELIMINARY- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 10' -0" Grade —1 Dia. 111111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I L - - - - -� I I 1 I I I I I - - - - --j I I L - - - -- No.: 04- 0278- BDN -R4 Page: Date: 7/11 /03 By: JDI Notes: 1). Concrete shall have a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 3000 PSI, in accordance with ACI 318 -02. 2). Rebar to conform to ASTM specification A615 Grade 60. 3). All rebar to have a minimum of 3" concrete cover. 4). All exposed concrete corners to be chamfered 3/4 ". 5). The foundation design is based on the geotechnical report by PSI, Project No. 387- 85071, dated April 10, 1998. 6). See the geotechnical report for drilled pier installation requirements, if specified. TOWER BASE ( Rebar Schedule Per Pier 132.35 Cu. Yds. each) (1 REQUIRED) Pier (48) #10 vertical rebar w /#4 ties 12" spacing AGENDA JAN 13 2004 Pg --il— Information contained herein is the sole property of Sabre Communications Corporation, constitutes a trade secret as oenneo -ay rvwa v— shall not be reproduced, copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of Sabre communications Corporation. 2101 Murray St - P.O. Box 658 - Sioux City, to 51102 -0658 - Phone 712.258.6690 - Fax 712.258.8250 eabre Comrnaedcations Corporation Customer: Pinnacle Towers, Inc. Site: Naples, FL 700 ft. Model 4400 SRW Guyed Tower (44 in, face) At 120 mph Wind + 0 in. Ice per ANSI TIA/EIA- 222 -F -1996. Antenna Loading per Page 1 PRELIMINARY- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 8' -0" Grade --1 Dia. r- - - - - -I I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - --� I INNER ANCHOR ELEVATION VIEW (86.57 Cu. Yds. each) (3 REQUIRED) No.: 04- 0278- BDN -R4 Page: Date: 7/11/2003 By: JDI Notes: 1). Concrete shall have a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 3000 PSI, in accordance with AC 1 318 -02. 2). Rebars to conform to ASTM specification A615 Grade 60. 3). All rebar to have a minimum of 3" concrete cover. 4). All exposed concrete corners to be chamfered 314 ". 5). The foundation design is based on the geotechnical report by PSI, Project No. 387- 85071, dated April 10, 1998. 6). See the geotechnical report for drilled pier installation requirements, if specified. Rebar Schedule per Pier (46) #10 vertical rebar w/#4 ties @ Pier 12" spacing JAN 13 2004 P9. $O Information contained herein is the sole property of Sabre Communications Corporation, constitutes a trade secret as defined by Iowa Code Ch. 550 and shall not be reproduced, copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of Sabre Communications Corporation. 2101 Murray St - P.O. Box 658 - Sioux City, IA 51102 -0658 - Phone 712.258.6690 - Fax 712.258.8250 M. sabre Communtcathns Corpore loe Customer: Pinnacle Towers, Inc. Site: Navies, FL 700 ft. Model 4400 SRW Guyed Tower (44 in. face) At 120 mph Wind + 0 in. Ice per ANSIlTIA/EIA- 222 -F -1996. Antenna Loading per Page 1 No.: 04- 0278- BDN -R4 Page: Date: 7/11/2003 By: JDI PRELIMINARY- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 8' -0" Grade Dia. r- - - - - -1 111111 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I � I I I I I I I I L - - - - -I I I I t I I 1 1 - - - - -- t I L - - - -- OUTER ANCHOR ELEVATION VIEW (60.5 Cu. Yds. each) (3 REQUIRED) Notes: 1). Concrete shall have a minimum 2May compressive strength of 3000 PSI, in accordance with ACI 318 -02. 2). Rebars to conform to ASTM specification A615 Grade 60. 3). All rebar to have a minimum of 3" concrete cover. 4). All exposed concrete corners to be chamfered 314 ". 5). The foundation design is based on the geotechnical report by PSI, Project No. 387- 85071, dated April 10, 1998. 6). See the geotechnical report for drilled pier installation requirements, if specified. Rebar Schedule per Pier (46) #8 vertical rebar w/#4 ties @ Pier 112" spacing Information contained herein is the sole property of Sabre Communications Corporation, constitutes a trade secret as defined shall not be reproduced. copied or used in whole or part for any purpose whatsoever without the prior written consent of Sabre t 2101 Murray St - P.O. Box 658 - Sioux City, IA 51102 -0658 - Phone 712.258.6690 - Fax 712.258.8250 JAN 13 2004 1 Me rh srn 2nri Federal Aviation Administration Southern Regional Office 1701 Columbia Avenue -ASO -520 College Park, GA 30337 Issued Date: 6/4/2003 JANIS E. MERRITTS, FAA /F(. ' COMr SIP' -E PINNACLE TOWERS INC. 301 N. CATTLEMEN RD., SUITE 3P SARASOTA, FL 34232 -6427 ** THIS IS NOT . DETr '4INATION ** Aeronautical Study No. 2003 -ASO- 2902 -OE The Federal Aviation Administration has r,.:e.ved your notice concerning: Structure Type: Antenna Tower Location: NAPLES, FL Latitude: 26 -3 -11.32 NAD 83 Longitude: 81 -42 -10.4 Heights: 720 feet above ground level (AGL) 724 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) NOTE:/ If the coordinates of your notice were submitted in NAD 27 datum, they have been converted to NAD 83 datum as shown above. NAD 83 datum will be referenced on all future correspondence and will be used for the purpose of this study. Your notice has been assigned Aeronautical Study Number 2003 -ASO- 2902 -OE and we are in the process of conducting an aeronautical study to determine the affect on air navigation. A determination or response will be forthcoming. Please inform involved consultants of this correspondence. If you have any questions, please contact Michael Blaich at (404)305 -5580. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to Aeronautical Study Number 2003 -ASO- 2902 -OE. Attachment(s) Frequency Data Page 1 (REC) 182335 CU- 2003 -AR -4524 PROJECT W2003060041 DATE: 7/31/03 MIKE BOSI COMPANION ITEM TC JAN 13 2C34 P. ga }• Frequency Data for ASN 2003 -ASO- 2902 -08 LOW HIGH FREQUENCY ERP FREQUENCY FREQUENCY UNIT ERP UNIT 406 420 MHz .2 KW , 156 173 MHz • 2 KW AGENDA I I tm f1 Date: To: Fax #: From: Re: Attached: Mike, P I N N A C L E To w f r i '! X C 06/05/03 Mike Blaich FAA Southern Region 404 - 305 -5099 Janis E. Merritts Pinnacle # 117 -004 Naples, FL 3 pages of.frequency data Thank you for your phone call this morning regarding the frequencies planned for the Naples tower. I checked with Gary Branch, one of our RF Engineers, and he supplied the attached data.' He can be reached at 888 - 748 -3482, Ext. 1164 or Gbranch(a-_)pintowers.com if there are questions. Janis J merritts @pintowers.com 888- 748 -3482 X 1502 fax: 941 - 364 -8761 Total Number of Pages, Including Cover: 4 If you do not receive all pages, please contact me at (888) 748 -3482, Ext. 1502. 301 North Cattlemen Road Sarasota, Florida 34232 JAN 13 2304 88&-74&3482 3482 941 364.8886 fax 94I 364.8761 pinnaclelowers.com Tx Circuit # Preset # 1 2 3 4 5 6 f 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 i Av.J r4 Cc ; ! ow z-A. S D/ i 7- 0 o 1 2 3 Code Frequency Code Frequency Code Frequency CG Ch 455 411.7875 Ch 06 156.3000 Ch 06 156.3000 CG Ch 550 412.9750 Ch 12 156.6000 Ch 12 156.6000 CG Ch 554 413.0250. Ch 16 156.8000 Ch 16 156.8000 UHF LE Calling 414.0375 Ch 21A 157.0500 Ch 21A 157.0500 UHF IR Callin 410.2375 Ch 81A 157.0750 Ch 81A 157.0750 UHF Data Tx Data Chart Ch 22A 157.1000 Ch 22A 157.1000 Ch 23A 157.1500 Ch 23A 157.1500 Ch 83A 157.1750 Ch 83A 157.1750 LANT01 155.4750 VHF LE Calling 167.0875 LANT03 162.3250 VHF IR Calling Tx 169.5375 LANT04 163.0500 LANTAREA Common 164.5500 VHF Data Tx Backu 172.3125 AGENDA JAN 11 2CSS4 r4l. gs of 3 _ Rx Circuit # Preset # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 •14 15 16 �nJNF1CGG'' ��'c�l ECG p i i 7 FL 1 2 3 Code ' Frequency Code Frequency Code Frequency CG Ch 455 411.7875 Ch 06 156.3000 Ch 06 156.3000 CG Ch 550 412.9750 Ch' 12 .156.6000 Ch 12 156.6000 CG Ch 554 413.0250 Ch 16 Backup 156.8000 Ch 16 (Backup) 156.8000 UHF LE Calling 414.0375 Ch 21A 157.0500 Ch 21A 157.0500 UHF IR Calling 419.2375 Ch 81A 157.0750 Ch 81A 157.0750 UHF Data RX Data Chart Ch 22A 157.1000 Ch 22A 157.1000 Ch 23A 157.1500 Ch 23A 157.1500 Ch 83A 157.1750 Ch 83A 157.1750 LANT01 155.4750 � ,t*4 ' sx I Rx #1 Mir! I VMV MR-AM JAN 13 20104 4 Code Frequency Code Frequency Code Frequency VHF Data Tx Data Chart Ch 70 156.5250 Ch 16 156.8000 VHF LE Calling 3 (Backup) 167.0875 VHF iR Calling Tx (Backup) 169.5375 VHF Data Tx (Backup) 172.3125 !""1AJNAC4,E D/f 7 -GAY. AGENDA JAN 13 2004 pg. 8 I • Form Approved OMB No. 2120 -0001 Please Type or Print on This Form FOR FAA USA ONLY Failure To Provide All Requested Information May Delay Processing of Your Notice A.M-11el seedy na,. »r LL3.DepanmenlofTnnsponnlon Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration V d ral AW."..Administratlen " e ponsor (person, company, etc. proposing this actlon): kttn.or:_Janis E. Merritts 0117 -004 came: _Pinnacle Towers Inc. kddress: 301 N. Cattlemen Rd. _Suite 300 Sarasota State:_F g L -- zlp:_U232 -6427 uy:_.__ relephone: _.—(888) -748 -3482 Fax: - (941)_364 -8761 2. Sponsor's Representative (if other than 01): Attn.oC Name. Address: city:-- Telephone: 3. Notice of: R New Construction ❑ Alteration ❑ usting 4. Duration: 5( Permanent ❑ Temporary(- months _ days) S. Work Schedule: Beginning End G. Type: R1 Antenna Tower C] Crane ❑ Building ❑ Power Line ❑ Landfill ❑ Water Tank ❑ Other 7. Marking/Painting and/or Lighting Preferred: R1 1 Red Lights and Paint ❑ Dual - Red and Medium Intensity White ❑ White - Medium Intensity ❑ Dual -Red and High Intensity White (3 White - High Intensity ❑ Other 18. FCC Antenna Structure Registration Number of applicable): 21. Complete Description of Proposal: 9. Latitude: 26' 003 11.32 1o: Longitude: _081 -0 42_' 10.40 " 11. Datum: n NAD 83 ❑ NAD 27 ❑ Other 12. Nearest: City: _.Naples / State: FL_ 13. Nearest Pubiic -use (not prtvate -use) or Military Airport or Heliport: 14. Distance from #13.'to Structure: _3.4438 nm 15. Direction from #13. to Structure: 335 degrees 16. Site Elevation {AMSN: 4 n' 17. Total Structure Height (A GL): 720 I R• 18. Overall Height (#16. + #17.) (AMSL): —724 it, 19. Previous FAA Aeronautical Study Number pfapplicable): OE 20. Description of Location: (Attach a USGS 7.5 minute Quadrangle Map with the precise site marked and any certified survey.) Please see attached pages. Pinnacle Towers Inc. requests approval to build a new tower adjacent to our tower having Study No. 99- ASO- 5531 -OE. A 7460 -1 package is simultaneously being submitted to correct the site elevation and heights of the existing tower. Radio Frequency Data reflects tenants planned to install on the new tower. Frequencies are in MHz, ERP in Kw. JAN 13 2004 Pa, 8 8 FrequencyiPower (KW) 1156-173 10.200 406 - 420 0.200 -420 0.200 Notice Is required by 14 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 77 pursuant to 49 U.S.C., Section 44718. Persons who knowingly and willingly violate the notice requirements of part 77 are subject to a civil penalty of $1,000 per day until the notice is received, pursuant to 49 U.S.C., Section 46301 (a). �r Hereby certify that all of the above statements made by me are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge. in addition, l agree to mar and /or light the structure In accordance with established marking & lighting standards as necessary. Date Typed or Printed Name and Title, of Person Filing Notice S7pn re 06 -02 -2003 Janis E. Merritts, FAAIFCC Compliance Analyst 1502 FAA Form 7460 -1 (02 -99)Supersedes Previous Edition - NSN. 0052 -00.012 -0008 I wr. --ass wl. 14, -Nn TkA- "f, 15- Lp pbvw G ELmzw-- L N 1E SURVEYING, INC. FAA TOWER CERTIFICATION March 12, 2003 Naples Site, PTI Site No. 01 17-004 PROPOSED TOWER Collier County, Florida e above- I hereby certify that the following Latitude and Longitude 5 feetlhorizontally; and thater of the following referenced proposed tower are accurate to within +/- proposed tower site elevation is accurate to within +/- 3 feet vertically. NAD 83 Latitude: 26° 03' 11.32" N. Longitude: 81° 42' 10.40" W. NAD 27 Latitude: 26° 03' 09.98" N. Longitude: 81° 42' 11.09" W. Ground Elevation at Base of Proposed Tower: 53.7 Feet NAVD88 .0 Feet NGVD GeoLine Surveying, Inc. /07 Darid G. Short, P. S.M. Florida Professional Surveyor -and Mapper Certificate of Registration No. 5022 P.O. Box 12653 • Grainmille, Florida 32604 • Tel: 352.371.3080 • Fax: 352 -336 -0541 • JAN 13 2UU4 P9 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Will Kriz [mailto:wckriz @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:07 PM To: Donna Fiala Cc: Keith Tompkins Subject: 800 Foot Tower Dear Ms. Fiala, I am sending this message because of my objection to the location of a proposed 800' tall tower on Tower Road, immediately west of SR 951 and south of the Eagle Creek community. I realize that any project associated with "Homeland Security" is hard to argue with. And, for that reason, I do not want to risk standing in front of the Board of County Commissioners and possibly be criticized and therefore embarrassed. I am not against the tower, just it's location. I request that you ask the U.S. Coast Guard (or the contractor building the tower) to find another place that is less congested with residents. Another site that is more isolated and poses less impact on the many residents who live in adjacent Holiday Manor, Manatee Road, Eagle Creek, and who will live at Lands End would be much better. 800' of blinking red lights, in addition to the two current towers of blinking red lights, will negatively impact the numerous neighbors. We are aware of other more isolated tower locations in the area. Additionally, I cannot speak for the Marco Airport, but, helicopters and airplanes about to land or take off should be quite concerned about the 800' height. As you recall, several years ago a plane landing at the airport hit an existing tower guy wire, crashed, and two people died. Parts of the airplane landed on the Eagle Creek golf course, very close to homes. At 800' the proposed tower is even taller than the one the airplane crashed into. And incidently, that tower has since been lowered as we understand at the request of the Federal Aviation Administration. So, all things considered, i.e., safety, blinking lights, affect on the residents and inappropriate citing of the tower lead me to think that it should be placed elsewhere. I would like the Commission to suggest to the builder to come back to them with another location for consideration. Please accept my many thanks for this and the good job you are doing overall. Sincerely, Carolyn Kriz 732 -1982 AGENDA ITIrM� Nck JAN 13 2004 Pa. im z ry RFcely =, , Fo Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH GOVERNOR Mr. Cesar I. Perez FAA — Southern Regional Office 1701 Columbia Avenue —ASO -520 College Park, GA 30337 Aviation Office JOSE ABREI 605 Suwannee Street, MS -46 SECRETARI Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 September 25, 2003 Re: Aeronautical Study #2003 -ASO- 2902 -OE Proposed Antenna Tower 724 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) Dear Mr. Perez: The State of Florida, Department of Transportation objects to the proposed tower as described in FAA Aeronautical Study #2003 -ASO- 2902 -OE. The 724 -foot above mean sea level (AMSL) antenna tower lies within a VFR route between Naples Municipal Airport (APF) and Marco Island Airport (MKY) that supports a high degree of VFR air traffic. Pursuant to FAA Order 7400.2E Change 2, "A structure would have a adverse effect upon VFR navigation if its height is greater than 500 feet above the surface at its site, and within 2 statute miles of any regularly used VFR route." The proposed antenna tower coordinates will place the tower within one (1) mile of the above - mentioned VFR route. Both Naples Municipal Airport (APF) and Marco Island Airport (MKY) support a significant number of flight operations. In fact, APF is one of the busiest airports in southwestern Florida, with a total of 138,185 annual operations for 2002. This includes over 92,000 itinerant operations and over 30,000 local operations. MKY, a general /corporate aviation airport, had a total of 14,580 annual operations in 2002. This includes over 10,000 itinerant operations and over 4,000 local operations. Due to Florida's weather pattern, most of the flights conducted on this VFR route are during VFR conditions and perhaps marginal VFR conditions. Geography also plays a significant role, considering the entire area is surrounded by the Everglades to the east and the Gulf of Mexico to the west. This VFR route continues on to Everglades Airport (X01), the most southwestern airport on the mainland of Florida, where a significant amount of sport fishing and Everglade's tourism is conducted. Since MKY and X01 are the two most southwestern airports on mainland Florida, a majority of VFR flights are conducted on the above - mentioned VFR route. Though, a 707 -foot AMSL antenna tower exists in close proximity to this proposal, the cumulative impact resulting from the proposed structure when combined with the impact of the existing structure would not be acceptable to the Department. If you have any questions, please feel fee to contact Aaron Smith or myself at 850 - 414 -4500. cc: Mr. Wayne Chewing, Aviation, FDOT District 1 Office Mr. Theodore Soliday, Naples Municipal Airport Mr. Robert Tweedie, Marco Island Airport Mr. Ray Bellows, Chief Planner, Collier County Ms. Janis E. Merritts, Pinnacle Towers Inc. MR , VA I Ice- b ©S I vwwv.dot.state.fl.us E. r AGENDAI Na ri JAIL 13 21004 Avrvricn PADFR RESOLUTION NO. 04 - A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CONDITIONAL USE "13" IN THE "A" RURAL AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT FOR A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2.2.3.13 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67 -1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a conditional use for a 700 foot guyed telecommunications tower pursuant to of Section 2.2.2.3.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code in an "A" Rural Agricultural District on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A ") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida that: The petition filed by James B. Malless, AICP of Wireless Planning Services, LLC, representing Pinnacle Towers Inc. with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit 'B" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein be and the= same is hereby approved for a conditional use for a 700 foot guyed telecommunications tower pursuant to Section 2.2.2.3.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code in an "A" Rural Agricultural District in accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "C ") and subject to the following conditions: -1- JAN 13 2;;04 P9-J-3-- t. The Director of the Department of Zoning and Land Development Review may approve minor changes in the location, sitting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the conditional use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use application, or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of the submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and Approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102). 2. Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if, during the course of site clearing, excavation, or other construction related activity, an historic or archeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped, and the Collier County Code Enforcement Director shall be contacted. 3. Pinnacle Tower Inc. or the current tower owner, shall submit a monitoring report to the planning services department director, every three years from the date of Board of Zoning Appeals approval, inventorying the businesses utilizing antennas located on the tower. 4. If the tower is no longer used by a governmental agency, above the height of 250 feet, then this conditional use shall expire and the tower shall be reduced to conform to the permitted height designated within the Rural Agricultural Zoning District. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super- majority vote. Done this day of 12004. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Madorw M. Student Assistant County Attorney CU- 2003- AR- 4i24/MB/sp -2- BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA , CILkH MAN AGENDA ITEM - M0. JAN 13 2UU PQ._3 • FINDINGS OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION r FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2003- AR4524 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.2.2.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of- A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes y No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes ✓ No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: _✓ No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes / No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) ( or approv DATE: IQ din CILAHtMAN: JAN 13 2004 HIBIT A Pg.�_ OR: 2324 PG: 3249 EXMIT 11.80 A tract of land in the Southwest 1/4 tracts described 5 n Official Records Book Collier County, Florida, being all of certain 165, Pages 54 and 56 of the deed records as follows: said Collier County, Florida., Said tract of land being more particularly described Commencing at the southwest corner of said Section 3; thence along the West line of said Section 3 North 00 °00115" West, 920.69 feet to a concrete monument found at the Northwest corner of a certain tract of land described as "General TV Tract" in said Official Records Book 165, Page 54; thence along the Northerly line of said "General TV;Tract" and parallel with the bond for the POINT OF BEGINNINGO'thencte line of said Section 3, South 799.84 feet to a concrete monument along the Easterly line of the land described in said Official Records Book 165, Pages 54 and 56, South 00 000'15" East, 604.76 feet to an iron pin set in the Northerly right - of -way line of Tower Road for the Southeast corner of tract herein described; thence along said Northerly right -of -way line, the following five (5) courses: (1) South 75 026'40" West, 21.01 feet to an iron pin set; (2) along a curve, concave to the Southeast whose elements are: central angle of 59 020'09 ", radius of 105.00 feet, are length of 108.74 feet and a chord that bears South 45 °44'36" West, 103.94 feet to an iron pin set; (3) South 16 004'49" West, 183.34 feet to an iron pin set; (4) along a curve, ments are: central angle of concave to the Northwest, whose and a chord that bears South 53'10'20" 1West, 54.21 45.00 feet, are length of 58.18 fee feet to an iron pin set; (5) North 89 048'15" West, 341.90 feet to a concrete monument found at the Southwest corner of a certain Parcel "A' described in said Official Records Book 165 Page 55• thence along the Westerly line of said Parcel "A', North 00 003'32" West, 178.61 feet to an iron pin set at the Northwest corner of said Parcel "A ", being also in the Southerly line of said "General TV Tract "; thence along said Southerly line North 89 047'21" West 268.79 feet to a concrete monument found at the Southwest corner of said "General TV Tract ", also being in the West line of said Section 3, being also the Southwest corner of said tract herein described; thence along said Section line, being also the Westerly line of said "General TV Tract ", North 00 000'15" West, 712.23 feet to a concrete monument found at the Northwest corner of said "General TV Tract ", being also the Northwest corner of the tract herein described; thence along the Northerly line of said General TV Tract and parallel with the South line of said Section 3, South 89 052'30" East, 799.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. V AGEMA ITEM- JAN 13 i (12:SODm)j$ ofCapn i a; i 01- I \ r � �' �� - r rt�rrrwrr t� � � i5' •� I -4 33 �, �!•s � Syr '� � .\•�\1 \�'� ri e i€ 0 .'. z ?=d�= :z 0 e Ag2 a tc Q � • � AGENDAllFM No.0 JAS! 13 2004 Pg•_ .j 0 .'. z ?=d�= :z 0 e Ag2 a tc Q � • � AGENDAllFM No.0 JAS! 13 2004 Pg•_ Pederal Aviation Administration Southern Regional Office. 1701 Columbia Avenue -ASO -520 College Park, GA 30337 Issued Date: 11/4/2003 JANIS 8. MERRITTS, FAA /FCC COMPLIANCE PINNACLE TOWERS INC. 301 N. CATTLEMEN RD., SUITE 300 SARASOTA, FL 34232 -6427 Aeronautical study No. 2003 -ASO- 2902 -OE ** DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** n// Z-00"/ The Federal Aviation Administration has completed an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and, if applicable, Title 14,of the Code of Federal Regulations,' part, 7, con0erning: Structure Type: Antenna Tower Location: NAPLES, PL Latitude: 26 -3 -11.32 NAD-83 Longitude: 81 -42 -10.4 Heights: 527 feet above ground level (AGL) 531 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of air navigation facilities. Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, it is hereby determined that the structure would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s) is(are) met: As a condition to this Determination, the structure should be marked and /or lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/ ?460 -1 AC 70/7460 -IK Change 1, Ob t_rgctios�_.Marking and. I ightim9y ..pfffi=&/ 3(Marked),4,5(Red), &12. It is required that the enclosed FAA Form 7460 -2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be completed and returned to this office any time the project is abandoned or: X_ At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460 -2, Part I) X Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height (7460 -2, Part II) As a result of this structure being critical to flight safety, it is required that the FAA be kept appraised as to the status of the project. Failure to respond to periodic FAA inquiries could invalidate this determination. To coordinate frequency activation and verify that no interference is caused to FAA facilities, prior to beginning any transmission from the site you must contact Pim Williams at 305- 526 -2177. See attachment for additional condition(s) or information. AGENDA This determination expires on 5/4/2005 unless- � �- JAN 13 2004 Page 1 PQ._F 500 /100'd T60Z# EE:OT £OOZ,ST'AOK ~ (a) extended, revised or terminated by the issuing office. (b) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed , as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case, the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application.. NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED TO THIS OFFICE AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. This determination is subject to review if an interested party files a petition on or before 12/4/2003. In the event a petition for review is filed, it must contain a full statement of the basis upon which it is made and be subpitted in ` triplicate to the Manager, Airspace•pranch, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. 20591. This determination becomes final on 12/14/2003 unless a petition is timely filed_ In which case, this determination will not become final pending disposition of the petition_ Interested parties will be notified of the grant of any review. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc_, Which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, state, or local government body. This aeronautical study considered and analyzed the impact on existing and proposed arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under both visual flight rules and instrument flight rules; the impact on all existing and planned public -use airports, military airports and aeronautical facilities; and the cumulative impact resulting from the studied structure when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed structures. The study disclosed that the described structure would have no substantial adverse effect on air navigation. An account of the study findings, aeronautical objections received by the FAA during the study (if any), and the basis for the FAA's decision in this matter can be found on the following page(s). A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission if the structure is subj ct to their licensing'authority.V.. Page 2 500 /Z00'd T60Z# JAN 13 2004 Pa._ -U- :OZ £007..6T'AON If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (404)305 -5589. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to / 7_00 41 Aeronautical Study Number 2003 -ASO- 2902 -0E. Q /- �ignature Control Rio: 346348- 227991 (DNH) Cesar 1. Perez Specialist Attachments) Additional Information Frequency Data C 500 /£00'd T60Z# Page 3 AGENDA II No JAN 13 2004 Pa. / Od ££:OT £OOZI6T'AON Additional Information for ASK 2003 -ASO- 2902 -OE 19i17-00'y The proposed structure would be located approximately 3.84 nautical miles northwest of the Marco Island Airport MY) airport reference. The structure, as proposed, will exceed the standard for determining obstructions to air navigation contained in Part ? ?, Subpart C, of the Federal Aviation Regulations as follows: Exceeds FAR Part 77.23 (a)(1) by 27 feet, its height exceeding 500 feet AGL at its site. Exceeds FAIL Part ? ?.23 (a) (2) by 255 feet, its height more than 2 ?2,feet above ground level (AGL), at its site with respect to the MRY Airport one letter of objection was received in response to circularization of the details of this proposed structure from the aeronautical public by letter dated September 25, 2003. This letter of #objection may be summarized as objecting to the proposal because it would be located within the vertical /hori2ontal confines of a regularly used VFR flyway (route). Successful negotiations with the proponent resulted in an agreement to lower the proposed structure to 527 feet AGL /531 AMSL. At this reduced height this structure would be located approximately 36 feet from a previously studied tower at the same AGL height and one foot higher AMSL (532 feet), and would therefore not have a greater effect on aircraft operations. The proposed structure was found to have no adverse effect on the VFR airport traffic patterns in the vicinity of the site. The impact on arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under VFR /IFR conditions at existing and planned public use airports, as well as aeronautical facilities, was considered during the analysis of the structure. The aeronautical study disclosed that the structure, at a height of 531 feet above mean sea level (AMSL), would have no adverse effect upon any terminal or en route instrument procedure or altitude. The cumulative - impact resulting front the structure, when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed structures was considered and found to be acceptable_ Therefore, it is determined that the structure will have no substantial adverse effect upon the safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of navigational facilities and will not be a hazard to air navigation. OF Page 4 600 /t00'd 160Z# No. JAN 13 2004 pie /01 ££:0T £OOZE WAOH " Frequency Data for ASN 2003 -i►SQ- 2902 -OE Q2%7-9e/ LOW HIGH FRBQUSNCY ERR ._ FREQV MCY FREQUENCY mix? ERR UMT 411.7875 0 MHZ .2 Kw . 412.975 0 MHz .2 KW 413.025 0 MHz .2 KW _ 414.0375 0 MHz .2 KW 410.2375 0 MHz .2 KW 156.3 0 MHz -2 KW 156.6 0 I MHz 12 KW 156.8 0 MHz .2 KW 157.05 0 MHz .2 Kw 157.075 0 Miz .2 KW 157.1 0 MHz .2 KW 157 -15 0 MHz .2 KW 157.175 0 MHz .2 KW 155.475 0 MHz .2 KW 162.325 0 MHz .2 KW 163.05 0 MHz .2 KW 164.55 0 MHz .2 KW 172.3125 0 MHz .2 KW 167.0875 0 Mfi2 .2 KW 169 -5375 •__ .- _ 0 - - -,d- _-- .. -... .. ._,,2. -... _. -_ . -_. _ ._.._ •- • _' 165.3375 0 MHz .2 KW 164.7125 0 MR2 .2 KW Page 5 900 /900'd T60Z# AGO" RW Z" JAN 13 2004 P9- boa b£ :OT £OOZ.6T'AOH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VA- 2003 -AR -4525 FOR: A VARIANCE OF 690 FEET FROM THE MINIMUM SEPARATION REQUIREMENT FROM RESIDENTIAL ZONING OF 1,750 FEET TO 1,060 FEET; A VARIANCE OF 450 FEET FROM THE REQUIRED MAXIMUM HEIGHT LIMITATION OF 250 FEET TO 700 FEET FOR TOWERS IN AN AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT; AND A VARIANCE OF 6 FEET FROM THE REQUIRED 30 -FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK TO 24 FEET FOR A SINGLE GUY ANCHOR POINT IN AN AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. OBJECTIVE: Staff is requesting that the Board review staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the CCPC regarding the above referenced Variance petition and render a decision as the Board of Zoning Appeals regarding the petition pursuant to LDC Section 2.7.5.12. CONSIDERATIONS: This petition was heard at the December 2, 2003 Board of County Commissioners scheduled public ---_ hearing. The petition and its companion item were continued to the January 13, 2004, BCC scheduled public hearing by the motion of Commissioner Fiala, and seconded by Commissioner Halas. The petition was continued to await the final determination of height for the tower by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) before a final decision is reached by the Board of Zoning Appeals. The FAA final determination of height was provided to the County from the applicant on December 16, 2003. The FAA determined the maximum height for the tower to be 527 feet to ensure the structure would have no adverse effect on navigable airspace. A copy of this determination is attached to this executive summary. James B. Malless AICP, of Wireless Planning Services, LLC, representing Pinnacle Towers, Inc., requesting a variance to reduce the required tower -to- residential separation dictated by Section 2.6.35.6.2. from a distance of 1,750 -feet to 1060 -feet. A variance is also requested from Section 2.2.2.4.3. to reduce the side yard setback for the northwest guy anchor from 30 feet to 24 feet. A third variance is requested for the tower to exceed the 250 -foot tower height limitation by 450 feet to allow a communications tower at 700 feet in height, as established in the Agricultural zoning district within Section 2.6.35.6.2.3. The petitioner seeks to construct a 700 -foot telecommunications tower on 14.55± acres of land which already supports a 524 -foot tower. This petition is a companion item to CU- 2003 -AR -4524. The tower is being constructed for the United States Coast Guard, a division of the Homeland Defense Department, to bolster the Rescue 21 advanced search and rescue communications system JAN 13 2004 VA- 2003 -AR -4525 executive summary Page 1 of 4 1 P9 and the Homeland Defense program. This system is the main component of the boater rescue system and the Homeland Defense system. These systems, which focus on the coastal waters, dictate an antenna location within the coastal region. Throughout the Collier coastal area, there are no locations that currently exist which could house the equipment at the height required. Additional information concerning the Coast Guard's Rescue 21 communication system is included within the package attached to this executive summary. The location of the requested tower is centered within the existing coverage gap of the Rescue 21 system, as indicated by the attached application. To satisfy the existing coverage gap, the tower is needed at the proposed location. If a tower is not located within the center of the coverage gap, then a tower would be needed to the north of the center and the south of the center to provide the same coverage. The requested height and the needed variances will eliminate the need for 2 other new 700 -foot towers that would be required to serve this area. The subject parcel is currently developed with a 524 -foot telecommunications tower. This tower was originally constructed at 700 -feet and was reduced to its present height in June, 2000 to structurally accommodate a number of telecommunication providers. The presence of the existing tower on the 14.55 acre property establishes a visual intrusion to the view plane of the area. The addition of a second tower, while adding to the existing visual intrusion, will not create a greater impact to the area than would be experienced if the proposed tower had been the first tower to be developed in the general area. The subject property is surrounded by natural vegetation that will minimize the impact of the side yard reduction. Also, the property line where the side yard reduction is sought borders a golf course tract within the Eagle Creek PUD. The existing 524 -foot guyed wired tower will minimize the visual impact of the proposed tower. At the time this executive summary was generated, staff had received one letter of objection to the proposed tower. At the required Neighborhood Information Meeting, a representative of the Eagle Creek Home Owners Association indicated that the Association had no objection to the tower and there were no speakers in opposition at the Collier County Planning Commission held October 16, 2003. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this petition will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of this variance will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth Management Plan, there fore there is no Growth Management Impact Associated with this Executive Summary. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: —. There are no environmental issues associated with this petition. VA- 2003 -AR -4525 executive summary Page 2 of 4 JAN 13 2004 P9--CL- HISTORIC /ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: Staff's analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is not located within an Area of Historical and Archaeological Probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no survey or waiver of Historic and Archaeological Survey & Assessment is required. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC did not review this petition because the EAC does not normally hear variance petitions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: A number of factors were utilized by staff in reaching our recommendation. The residential properties within the Eagle Creek PUD were developed with the presence of an existing tower and within the limit of the separation requirement. The proposed tower would be utilized by the United States Coast Guard to further the health, safety and welfare of Collier County. The presence of natural buffers surrounding the exterior of the subject site provides a natural screening of the base of the use from the surrounding properties. In addition, the golf course tract within Eagle Creek, which abuts the subject property to the west and north, provides further protection as a buffer between the base of the tower and guyed anchor points. Finally, the need for the proposed tower is motivated by the Coast Guard's Rescue 21 system. The subject site provides the greatest opportunity to locate their system with the least amount of disruption to the surrounding area due to the presence of the existing 524 -foot tower. Staff feels that the functionality of health, safety and welfare provided from the proposed tower, coupled with the limited public opposition and the existing 524 -foot tower on the subject parcel justifies the granting of the three variances identified within this petition. Staff recommends approval of Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4525 to the Board of Zoning Appeals, subject to the following conditions: 1. These variances are for the variances shown in Exhibit "A" only. Any other variance shall require a separate variance petition. 2. In case of the destruction of the tower, for any reason, the tower may be replaced with the dimensional variances expressed within the petition, contingent that the conditions of petition CU- 2003 -AR -4524 are still being satisfied. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPQ RECOMMENDATION: This petition was heard at the October 16, 2003, CCPC meeting. The Commission motioned to forward petition CU- 2003 -AR -4525 with a recommendation of APPROVAL subject to staff's conditions, the motion passed UNANIMOUSLY by a vote of eight to zero. JAN 13 2004 VA- 2003 -AR -4525 executive summary Page 3 of 4 1 PREPARED BY: MIKE BOSI, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 17 *TA iWAIIAa1)a,.It /?, �' A /�- - RAY LLOW , CHIEF PLANNER DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW USAN MURRAY, AICP, INTEKIM DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: O PH K. SCHMITT, ADMINISTRATOR MUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL URVICES DIVISION VA- 2003 -AR -4525 executive summary Page 4 of 4 /2- e= 0-3 DATE /?,-8 " °3 DATE /L DATE DATE AGENDA ITEM Na, JAN 13 2004 Pa-� 'A 61 &I AGENDA ITEM 8 -C MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION; PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION DATE: September 18, 2003 SUBJECT: Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4525 — Companion to CU- 2003 -AR -4524 PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: OWNER: Pinnacle Towers Inc. , 301 North Cattleman Road Sarasota, FL 34232 AGENT: James B. Malless, AICP , ' Firm Wireless Planning Services, LLC 845 Mississippi Avenue Lakeland, FL 33801 REQUESTED ACTION: James B. Malless AICP, of Wireless Planning Services, LLC, representing Pinnacle Towers, Inc., requesting a variance to reduce the required tower to residential separation dictated by Section 2.6.35.6.2. from a distance of 1,750 -feet to 1060 -feet. A variance is also requested from Section 2.2.2.4.3. to reduce the side yard setback for the northwest guy anchor from 30 -feet to 24 -feet. A third variance is requested for the tower to exceed the 250 -foot tower height limitation by 450 -feet to allow a communications tower at 700 -feet in height, as established in the Agricultural zol;ing district within Section 2.6.35.6.2.3. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 305 Tower Road, in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 14.55± acres. Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4525 CCPC Date: October 16, 2003 Page 1 of 9 JAN 13 2004 P9- - 0 f LOCATION MAP SITE MAP 0 PETITION rV . 2003- AR- 4525 PURPOSEMESCRIPTION OF REOUEST: S,TE LOCATION The petitioner seeks to construct a 700 -foot telecommunications tower on 14.55± acres of land which already supports a 524 -foot tower. This petition is a companion item to CU- 2003 -AR -4524. The tower is being constructed for the United States Coast Guard, a division of the Homeland Defense Department, to bolster the Rescue 21 advanced search and rescue communications system and the Homeland Defense program. This system is the main component of the boater rescue system and the Homeland Defense system. These systems, which focus on the coastal waters, dictate an antenna location within the coastal region. Throughout the Collier coastal area, there are no locations that currently exist which could house the equipment at the height required. Additional information concerning the Coast Guard's Rescue 21 communication system is included within the package attached to this staff report. The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the required tower to residential separation distance from 1,750 -feet to 1060 -feet. This is a reduction of 690 -feet. A residential district within the Eagle Creek PUD is approximately 1060 -feet from the base of the proposed tower. Section 2.6.35.6.2. requires that a tower over 75 -feet tall be separated from a residential zoning district boundary or PUD zoning of 6 residential units or less boundary by a distance equal to 2.5 times the tower height. The 700 -foot tower would need to be 1,750 -feet from the nearest re district and the proposed tower is only 1060 -feet from the nearest residential zoni g diMORDA variance is also requested from Section 2.6.35.6.2 for the tower to exceed the 50- ib!t-tvtiv Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4525 CCPC Date: October 16, 2003 Page 2 of 9 JAN 13 2004 f. 4 L LecATICN I 'J a f LOCATION MAP SITE MAP 0 PETITION rV . 2003- AR- 4525 PURPOSEMESCRIPTION OF REOUEST: S,TE LOCATION The petitioner seeks to construct a 700 -foot telecommunications tower on 14.55± acres of land which already supports a 524 -foot tower. This petition is a companion item to CU- 2003 -AR -4524. The tower is being constructed for the United States Coast Guard, a division of the Homeland Defense Department, to bolster the Rescue 21 advanced search and rescue communications system and the Homeland Defense program. This system is the main component of the boater rescue system and the Homeland Defense system. These systems, which focus on the coastal waters, dictate an antenna location within the coastal region. Throughout the Collier coastal area, there are no locations that currently exist which could house the equipment at the height required. Additional information concerning the Coast Guard's Rescue 21 communication system is included within the package attached to this staff report. The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the required tower to residential separation distance from 1,750 -feet to 1060 -feet. This is a reduction of 690 -feet. A residential district within the Eagle Creek PUD is approximately 1060 -feet from the base of the proposed tower. Section 2.6.35.6.2. requires that a tower over 75 -feet tall be separated from a residential zoning district boundary or PUD zoning of 6 residential units or less boundary by a distance equal to 2.5 times the tower height. The 700 -foot tower would need to be 1,750 -feet from the nearest re district and the proposed tower is only 1060 -feet from the nearest residential zoni g diMORDA variance is also requested from Section 2.6.35.6.2 for the tower to exceed the 50- ib!t-tvtiv Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4525 CCPC Date: October 16, 2003 Page 2 of 9 JAN 13 2004 f. 4 L " height limitation established in the Rural Agricultural zoning district. The variance is requested to provide enough height that the US Coast Guard antennas will reach the area that they need to reach to provide the required service. 2.6.35.6.2. Permitted ground- mounted towers. Towers not exceeding the stated maximum heights are a permitted use subject to other applicable provisions of this section, including separate requirements and shared use provisions. Towers that exceed those specified maximum heights require a variance in accordance with section 2.7.5. 1. All commercial and industrial zoning districts and urban designated area agricultural zoning districts: Any tower up to 75 feet in height is a permitted use provided the base of such tower is separated a minimum distance of 75 feet from the nearest boundary with any parcel of land zoned RSF -1 through RSF - 6, RMF -6, E, RMF -12, RMF -16, RT, VR, MH, TTR VC, or PUD permitting six residential dwelling units or less. Any tower that exceeds 75 feet in height up to a height of 185 feet is a lawful use only if permitted or otherwise provided in the respective zoning district and the base of such tower is separated from the nearest boundary of any parcel of land zoned RSF -1 through RSF -6, RMF -6, E, RMF -12, RMF -16, RT, VR, MH, TTRVC, or PUD zoning of six residential dwelling units or less, by a minimum distance A110 �A determined by multiplying the height of the tower (in feet) by a factor of 2.5. (The minimum par I� ITIEM Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4525 CCPC Date: October 16. 2003 Page 3 of 9 1 JAN 13 2004 PC- -I- ' ` e � O" w. � � � � � �m�'rrrvwr.wr-n'/'rr'v"rr^n � . ....... ,.. u- za+ .,•...- NAPLES. Fl GVYEDTOMR I ! _ .. I 0117.001 JUS iCM•FN RJM —ES .R Ytt) _ I ' o.<wa vnn,w yA OVERALL Sin RM 1 2.6.35.6.2. Permitted ground- mounted towers. Towers not exceeding the stated maximum heights are a permitted use subject to other applicable provisions of this section, including separate requirements and shared use provisions. Towers that exceed those specified maximum heights require a variance in accordance with section 2.7.5. 1. All commercial and industrial zoning districts and urban designated area agricultural zoning districts: Any tower up to 75 feet in height is a permitted use provided the base of such tower is separated a minimum distance of 75 feet from the nearest boundary with any parcel of land zoned RSF -1 through RSF - 6, RMF -6, E, RMF -12, RMF -16, RT, VR, MH, TTR VC, or PUD permitting six residential dwelling units or less. Any tower that exceeds 75 feet in height up to a height of 185 feet is a lawful use only if permitted or otherwise provided in the respective zoning district and the base of such tower is separated from the nearest boundary of any parcel of land zoned RSF -1 through RSF -6, RMF -6, E, RMF -12, RMF -16, RT, VR, MH, TTRVC, or PUD zoning of six residential dwelling units or less, by a minimum distance A110 �A determined by multiplying the height of the tower (in feet) by a factor of 2.5. (The minimum par I� ITIEM Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4525 CCPC Date: October 16. 2003 Page 3 of 9 1 JAN 13 2004 PC- -I- distance is 2 112 times the height of the tower.) Towers which do not meet the separation requirement may apply for a variance in accordance with section 2.7.5. • 2. Agricultural zoning districts within the rural designated area: Towers not exceeding 250 feet. A variance is also requested to reduce the side yard setback for the northwest guy anchor from 30- feet to 24 -feet. This is a 6 -foot reduction for the location of a guyed anchor point. The measurement is from the point where the anchor enters the earth. Section 2.6.35.6.16 requires that guyed anchors of towers over 75 -feet meet the setback standards of the zoning district. The zoning district of this parcel is Rural Agricultural, and the side setback standard is 30 -feet. The LDC requires that towers be able to withstand certain wind velocities based on the height of the tower. The design of the tower requires that the guy anchors be placed a specific distance from the tower in order to meet the County's engineering standards. The proposed tower must be placed in a certain spot so that it will not interfere with the existing tower on the site. These 2 issues drove the location of the guyed anchor and the need for the variance The LDC addresses minimum yard requirements within the Rural Agricultural zoning district as follows: Section 2.2.2.4.3. Minimum yard requirements. 1. Front yard. 50 feet. 2. Side yard. 30 feet. 3. Rear yard. 50 feet. Section 2.6.35.6.16. For all ground - mounted guyed towers in excess of 75 feet in height, the site . shall be of a size and shape sufficient to provide the minimum yard requirements of that zoning district between each guy anchor and all property lines. Section 2.6.35.6.16., as noted, requires that the guyed anchors meet the minimum 30 -foot setback from the side yard of the parent parcel. The site plan submitted with the application indicates that one of the guyed anchor points sits 24 -feet from the western property line. A variance of six feet from the required 30 -foot side yard requirement is needed for the telecommunications facility. is The location of the requested tower is centered within the existing coverage gap of the Rescue 21 system, as indicated by the attached application. To satisfy the existing coverage gap, the tower is needed at the proposed location. If a tower is not located within the center of the coverage gap, then a tower would be needed to the north of the center and the south of the center to provide the same coverage. The requested height and the needed variances will eliminate the need for 2 other new 700 -foot towers that would be required to serve this area. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: SUBJECT: SURROUNDING Petition VA- 2003- AR4525 Existing 524 -foot tower, zoned A North: Golf Course and Residential Structures, zoned PUD -Eagle Creek East: Cox Cable Complex, zoned A South: Undeveloped tract, zoned A West: Golf Course, zoned PUD -Eagle Creek CCPC Date: October 16, 2003 Page 4 of 9 No._7_�(L JAN 13 2004 Pg. 9 Oft GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed this request and offered the following comments: The subject property is designated Urban (Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict), as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. Relevant to this petition, this Subdistrict permits communication facilities. FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with the surrounding area. Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to Current Planning staff as part of their review of the petition in its totality. Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes that the proposed land use for this subject site can be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. The other applicable element of the GMP for which a consistency review was made is the Transportation Element. Ingress and egress to the site will be provided through Tower Road with access to the site via a gravel and broken pavement drive that is 12 feet wide. The number of vehicle trips generated by the use will be limited to monthly maintenance inspections. Based on this data, the site - generated traffic will not exceed the significance test standard (5 percent of the level of service LOS "C" design volume) on any County road. In addition, the site - generated trips will not lower the LOS below the adopted LOS "D" standard for any segment within the project's radius of development influence (RDI). Therefore, this project is consistent with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Transportation Element (TE). Petition VA- 2003- AR4525 CCPC Date: October 16, 2003 Page 5 of 9 AGENDA ITEM NOL_Z_jL JAN 13 2004 HISTORIGARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: • Staffs analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is not located within an area of historical and archaeological probability as 'referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, a Historical/Archaeological Survey and As §essment or waiver is not required. EVALUATION FOR IMPACTS TO TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENVIRONMENT: Approval of this variance request will have no effect on infrastructure, transportation or the environment. ANALYSIS: Section 2.7.5 of the Land Development Code grants the authority to the Board of Zoning Appeals to grant variances. The Planning Commission is advisory to the BZA and utilizes the provisions of Section 2.7.5.6.1 through 2.7.5.6.8, which are general guidelines to be used to assist the Commission in making a determination. Responses to the items in Section 2.7.5.6 are as follows: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? Yes. The subject parcel is currently developed with a 524 -foot telecommunications tower. This tower was originally constructed at 700 -feet and was reduced to its present height in • June, 2000 to structurally accommodate a number of telecommunication providers. The presence of the existing tower on the 14.55 acre property establishes a visual intrusion to the view plane of the area. The addition of a second tower, while adding to the existing visual intrusion, will not create a greater impact to the area than would be experienced if the proposed tower had been the first tower to be developed in the general area. • The LDC requires that towers be able to withstand certain wind velocities based on the height of the tower. The design of the tower requires that the guyed anchors be placed at specific distances from the tower to meet the county's engineering standards and the proposed tower must be placed in a certain spot to not interfere with the original tower. These two circumstances dictated the location of the guyed anchor and the need for the 6- foot side yard reduction. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre- existing conditions relative to the property, which is the subject of the variance request? Yes. The residential units within the Eagle Creek PUD were developed subsequent to the development of the existing tower. With the construction of these units, the original tower was rendered non - conforming due to the separation requirements contained within Section 2.6.35. The location of residential development has created a situation in which the proposed tower requires a variance from the separation requirements. AGENDA ITEM NaL-1iC- Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4525 CCPC Date: October 16, 2003 Page 6 of 9 JAN 13 2074 f• / O C. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work. unnecessary an undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? Yes. If this variance is denied the applicant could still enjoy the present use of the land with the current telecommunications tower, but the Coast Guard, whom the tower is intended to serve, would be forced to find an alternative location to house their Rescue 21 communications system. Within the coastal region of Collier County, there are no existing structures with the necessary height to locate the Rescue 21 equipment upon, and denial of the proposed tower request would generate the need for two additional towers to be developed within the Collier coastal area, due to the lack of a viable alternative within the Collier Boulevard corridor. The denial of this variance and proposed tower would run contrary to Section 2.6.35.6.8. of the LDC which encourages the use of a , parcel for the placement of multiple towers. d. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? Yes. The variances proposed are the minimum variances 'to allow the implementation of the Rescue 21 system. As noted, the subject parcel is currently the site of an existing telecommunications facility. The requested variances will allow for the implementation of a rescue and national defense system that provides a needed function / to the County and the Country with the least amount impact to the area. Approval of the variances should not have a negative impact upon the standards of health; safety and welfare, rather through the implementation of the Rescue 21 system, the proposed tower would bolster the standards of health, safety and welfare, with the least amount of intrusion to a local area. e. Will granting the variance confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? No. Granting this variance will allow the petitioner to have a tower which is taller than the permitted 250 -foot height limitation for towers, separated from a residential zoning district less than the regulations require, and has an anchor point which does not meet the minimum standard for side yards in a Rural Agricultural district. The conditions which dictate the need for these variances have been outlined in this staff report; the purpose or function of the proposed tower is the motivating factor for granting approval. Other petitioners are not denied the same opportunity by the zoning regulations, rather the purpose and circumstances - which surround - their -request `would . dictate whether -they were denied the same special- - privilege _approval of this request would convey to the applicant. f. Will granting the variance be' in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? this report the purpose of the tower request is to allow the Coast Guard to implement the Rescue 21 system, which will broadly promote increased health, safety and welfare. • g• Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of 'the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? Yes. The subject property is surrounded by natural vegetation that will minimize the impact of the side yard reduction. Also, the property line where the side yard reduction is sought, borders a golf course'tract within the Eagle Creek PUD. The existing 524 46ot guyed wired tower will minimize the visual impact of the proposed tower. h. Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Approval of this variance petition will further the stated goals of protecting the health, safety and welfare of the County, which are the underlying legal concepts of the Growth Management Plan. ' EAC RECOMMENDATION: The Environmental Advisory Council does. not normally hear variance petitions, and did not hear this variance. PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • Staff has analyzed the guidelines associated with the variance request, and has determined that although there are no land- related hardship associated with.this variance, there are several ameliorating factors. The residential properties within the Eagle Creek PUD were developed with the presence of an existing tower and within the limit of the separation requirement. The proposed tower would be utilized by the United States Coast Guard to further the health, safety and welfare of Collier County. The presence of natural buffers surrounding the exterior of the subject site provides a natural screening of the base of the use from the surrounding properties. In addition, the golf course tract within Eagle Creek, which abuts the subject property to the west and north, provides further protection as a buffer between the base of the tower and guyed- anchor points. Finally, the need for the proposed tower is motivated by the Coast Guard's Rescue 21 system. The subject site provides the greatest opportunity to locate their system with the least amount of disruption to the surrounding area due to the presence of the existing 524 -foot tower. Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission recommend approval of Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4525 to the Board of Zoning Appeals , subject to the following conditions: 1. These variances are for the variances shown in Exhibit "A" only. Any other variance shall require a separate variance. 2. In case of the destruction of the tower, for any reason, the tower may be replaced with the dimensional variances expressed within the petition, contingent that the conditions of petition CU- 2003 -AR -4524 are still being satisfied. AGENDA MM JAN 13 2004 Petition VA- 2003- AR4525 CCPC Date: October 16, 2003 Page 8 of 9 / :02 PREPARED BY: MIKE BOSI , AICP PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEWED BY: /SUSAN MURRAY, AICP CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER APPROVED BY: a -as -o 3 DATE 9-go -03 DATE JO PH K. SC MITT, ADMINISTRATOR DATE C MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION Collier County Planning Commission: I I VES 1' kN !0 !6 D DATE Staff report for the October 16, 2003 Collier County Planning Commission Meeting Tentatively scheduled for the November 18, 2003 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4525 CCPC Date: October 16, 2003 Page 9 of 9 No._____I� --' JAN 13 2004 alll /� r VARIANCE PETITION (VARIANCE FROM SETBACK (S) REQUIRED FOR A PARTICULAR ZONING DISTRICT) Petition No. Commission District: Date Petition Received: VA- 2003- AR4525 PROJECT 42003060041 DATE: 7/30/03 MIKE BOSI J Planner Assigned: COMPANION ITEM TOCA- 2003 -AR -4524 ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF GENERAL INFORMATION: Petitioner's Name: Pinnacle Towers Inc. C/O Bonnie Bowers Petitioner's Address: 301 N. Cattleman Road, Suite 300, Sarasota, Fl 34232 Telephone: 941 - 308 -5215 Fax #: 941- 364 -8761 E -Mail Address: bbowers @pintowers.com Agent's Name: Wireless Planning Services, LLC, James B. Malless, AICP Agent's Address: 845 Mississippi Ave. Lakeland, FL 33801 Telephone: 863 - 838 -9686 Fax #: 863 - 688 -5176 E -Mail Address: jim @scrproperties.com * Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SERVICES /CURRENT PLANNING 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE - NAPLES, FL 34104 PHONE (941) 403 - 2400 /FAX (941) 643 -6968 Page 1 - Revised 4/03 JAN 13 2004 pg-_/_�__ Complete the following for all Association(s) affiliated with this petition. (Provide additional sheets if necessary) Name of Homeowner Association: N/A Mailing Address City State Zip Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address City State Zip Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address City State Zip Name of Master Association: N/A Mailing Address City State Zip Name of Civic Association: N/A Mailing Address City State Zip PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal Description of Subject Property: Subdivision: Unit Lot (s) Block (s) Section 3 Twp. 51 Range 26 Property I.D. # : 512603 006.0016B03/ 00724400009 Acreage Number: 14.55 Metes & Bounds Description: ATTACHED Address of Subject Property: 305 Tower Road (If different from Petitioner's address) AGIMA ITEM JAN 13 2004 pa. /,:r Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Parcel: Zoning AR Actual Use 524 -foot guyed tower and associated facilities Adjacent Zoning & Land Use: ZONING LAND USE N PUD Residential and golf course S C -3 & A Warehouse & Vacant W PUD Residential and golf course E PU "I" Office Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: 50 Corner Lot: Yes ❑ No X Side: 30 Waterfront Lot: Yes ❑ No X Rear: 50 JAN 13 2004 Pt.-LL- Nature of Petition Provide a detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25' to 18'; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number (s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. Existing Structures: 524 -foot guyed tower and associated structures, acquired by PTI in June, 1997. Existing structure was originally built has a 700 -foot tower, but was reduced in height in June, 2000. Proposed Structure: A 700 -foot guyed tower, 8 by 12 foot electronic equipment building, LP tank and generator. Vari ance 41: The request is to reduce the required tower to residential separation distance from 1,750 feet to 270 feet. This is a reduction of 1,480 feet. Section 2.6.35.6.2 requires that a tower over 75 feet tall be 2.5 times the tower height from residential zoning districts or PUD zoning of a 6 residential units or less. The 700 -foot tower would need to be 1,750 feet and the proposed tower is only 275 feet from the nearest residential zoning district. The variance is requested to provide enough height that the US Coast Guard antennas will reach the area that they need to reach to provide the required service. The requested height and the needed variance eliminates the need for 2 other new 700 -foot towers that would be required to serve this area. Variance # 2: Reduce the side yard setback for the northwest guy anchor from 30 feet to 24 feet. This is a 6- foot reduction on the location of the guyed anchor. The measurements are from the point where the anchor enters the earth. Section 2.6.35.6.15 requires that guyed anchors of towers over 75 feet meet the setback standards of the zoning district. The zoning district of this parcel is A and the side setback standard is 30 feet. The county code requires that towers be able to withstand certain wind velocities based on the height of the tower. The design of the tower requires that the guy anchors be placed a specific distance from the tower in order to meet the County's engineering standards. The proposed tower must be placed in a certain spot so that it will not interfere with the other tower. These 2 issues drove the location of the guyed anchor and the need for the variance. Please note that staff and the Collier County Planning Commission shall be guided in their recommendation to the Board of zoning Appeals, and that the Board of zoning appeals shall be guided in its determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the below listed criteria (1 -8). (Please address this criteria using additional pages if necessary.) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. Existing development of the site includes a 524 -foot guyed tower that was previously a 700 - foot tower. The height of the proposed tower is driven by the US Coast Guards needs. Section 2.6.35.6.8 states: "Placement of more than one tower in a land site is preferred and encouraged..." The site has heavy vegetation on the perimeter of the site. 2. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre- existing conditions relative to the property, which is the subject of the variance request? Prior to the owner purchasing the property the County approved the parcel for a 700 -foot guyed tower with associated facilities. The residential development occurred after the original tower was developed. The existing tower does not meet the standards that were approved after the tower was built. 3. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. In order for the applicant to meet the tower to residential separation the owner of the tower would need to acquire and remove all the residential structures within 1,750 feet of the tower. This is an undue hardship. The requested side yard setback variance is required to meet the County's engineering standards for safety. Meeting the setback standard would require the County to change its engineering standard. 4. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. Yes, these are the minimum variances required to meet the US Coast Guard's need for a 700 - foot tower in this area. It will provide for the safety of the local population and the visting boating population. 5. Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. AGENDA ITEM JAN 13 2V-34 Pg. 18 No. The granting of the variance will forward the stated purpose and intent in Section 2.6.35 to reduce the number of new tower sites and the Section 2.6.35.6.8 to promote multiple towers on a site to reduce the visual impact. 6. Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. No, the tower is being constructed to provide antenna space to the US Coast Guard to for its Rescuer 21 Program. Information on this program has been submitted to staff. The existing tower was originally built to 700 -feet and the area developed around the tower without any negative impact. The zoning code directs taller towers to the A zoning district because generally the district is not surrounded by residential development. The grouping of multiple towers on a site is encouraged by the code. 7. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. Yes, the site is surrounded by natural vegetation that will minimize the impact of the reduction in the side yard setback. The existing 524 -foot guyed tower will minimize the visual impact of the proposed 700 -foot tower. S. Will granting the variance be consistent with the growth management plan? Yes, the Growth Management Plan is based on providing for the health, safety and welfare of the people of Collier County. The proposed tower will provide for the communications system for the US Coast Guard. ** Section 2.7.2.3.2 (3) of the Land Development Code requires an applicant to remove their public hearing advertising sign (s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign (s) immediately No.- 7 L JAN 13 2004 Pt--Z±— VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET! REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED 1. Completed Application 15 2. Completed Owner /Agent Affidavit, Notarized 1 3. Pre - application notes /minutes 15 4. Survey of property, showing the encroachment 1 !� measured in feet) 5. Site Plan depicting the following: 15 a) All property boundaries & dimensions b) All existing and proposed structures (labeled as such) c) North arrow, date and scale of drawing d) Required setbacks & proposed setbacks 6. Location map depicting major streets in area for 1 y reference 7. Application fee = $1000 Data Conversion fee = $25 (minus fees paid at pre - application meeting) Checks shall be made payable to: t/ Collier County Board of Commissioners 8. Other Requirements - 4114 As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing of this petition. Applicant/Agent Signature Date JAN 13 2004 do pa•- -- -- EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of real property conveyed by Warranty Deed from Palmer Communications, Inc. to Pinnacle Towers, Inc. ISLE OF CAPRI Legal Description of site: A tract of land in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being all of certain tracts described in Official Records Book 165, Pages 54 and 56 of the deed records of said Collier County, Florida. Said tract of land being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Section 3; thence along the West line of said Section 3 North 00'00'15" West, 920.69 feet to a concrete monument found at the North,vest corner of a certain tract of land described as "General TV Tract" in said Official Records Book 165, Page 54; thence along the Northerly line of said "General TV Tract" and parallel with the South line of said Section 3, South 89 °52'30" East, 799.84 feet to a concrete monument found for the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along the Easterly line of the land described in said Official Records Book 165, Pages 54 and 56, South 00'00'15" East, 604.76 feet to an iron pin set in the Northerly right- of -way line of Tower Road for the Southeast corner of tract herein described; thence along said Northerly right -of -way line, the following five (5) courses: (1) South 75 °26'40" West, 21.01 feet to an iron pin set; (2) along a curve, concave to the Southeast whose elements are: central angle of 59 °20'09 ", radius of 105.00 feet, arc length of 108.74 feet and a chord that bears South 45 °44'36" West, 103.94 feet to an iron pin set; (3) South 16 004'49" West, 183.34 feet to an iron pin set; (4) along a curve, concave to the Northwest, whose elements are: central angle of 74 °04'31 ", radius of 45.00 feet, arc length of 58.18 feet and a chord that bears South 53 °10'20" West, 54.21 feet to an iron pin set; (5) North 89'48'15" West, 341.90 feet to a concrete monument found at the Southwest corner of a certain Parcel "A" described in said Official Records Book 165, Page 55; thence along the Westerly line of said Parcel "A ", North 00 °03'32" West, 178.61 feet to an iron pin set at the Northwest corner of said Parcel "A ", being also in the Southerly line of said "General TV Tract "; thence along said Southerly line North 89 °47'21" West 268.79 feet to a concrete monument found at the Southwest corner of said "General TV Tract ", also being in the West line of said Section 3, being also the Southwest corner of said tract herein described; thence along said Section line, being also the Westerly line of said "General TV Tract ", North 00'00'15" West, 712.23 feet to a concrete monument found at the Northwest corner of said "General TV Tract ", being also the Northwest corner of the tract herein described; thence along the Northerly line of said "General TV Tract" and parallel with the South line of said Section 3, South 89 °52'30" East, 799.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. AGENDA IT1:M No. I JAN 13 2004 Imo. a� DI,LII� �fJ1v ' VARIANCE PETITION PRE- APPLICATION MEETING NOTES & SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Date: G- ;6-03 Time: 1.15 Planner: M"V.t lsos Project Name: 4o —t V6ee sc Toww Project Addr/Location: Applicant Name: Jm.r,CS MA03 Phone: i5t,3 -c.J6 -33A Firm: Type of Petition: Vo,i,b or, Owner Name: 1�',nn�L1i Towr�s Current Zoning: A 9 Owner Address:_ --Sol 10 N tt� t —c. U f, 14.131 Phone: Meeting Attendees: SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: tZ 15 copies of completed Application ® Addressing Checklist signed by Addressing Dept ® Pre - application meeting notes ® 15 copies of Conceptual Site Plan 24" X 36" plus (one 8' /z X 11 copy) Completed Owner /Agent Affidavits, Notarized AGENDA ntM ® 2 copies of Deed ($1 2 copies of List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation No. ® Location map JAN 13 2004 IQ1 5 copies of Aerial Photograph (taken within the previous 12 months) 1 1 Pg. 07A ❑ 4 copies of EIS or EIS waiver ❑ 4 copies of TIS ❑ 4 copies of Utility Provisions Statement with sketches ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request Public Participation Meeting affidavit, notes �J Pre - application Fee $300.00 (to be credited toward application fee below) Fees: $1000.00 Application Fee 25.00 Data Conversion OTHER REQUIREMENTS: Im NOTES: Agent/Owner Signature Date: 2 JAN 13 2004 pt. a3 CONDITIONAL USE PETITION PRE- APPLICATION MEETING NOTES & SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Date: v aS - o? Time: % : % S Planner: M: Kc mss; Project Name: k4a te-a ID-S ,rV_ 'q'ae Project Addr /Location: Applicant Name: T. tj M,1Icss Phone: 8t,3-(Pk) -3323 Firm: Type of Petition: C lJ Current Zoning: A s Owner Name: Owner Address: C AV4"'O' Or. lWa -)'2 Phone: Meeting Attendees: S�t �?►��hn�c�i AL Sao_ C1.•��„� ��,;. M. <t S...,, ,Cc h AW,, SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: ® 20 copies of Application, completed ® One (1) Addressing Checklist signed by Addressing Dept ® 20 copies of Pre - application meeting notes ® 20 copies of Conceptual Site Plan 24" X 36" plus (one 8 '/z X 11 copy) ® Two (2) Copies of Deed(s) ® Completed Owner /Agent Affidavits, Notarized ❑ Four (4) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), or waiver. ® Five (5) Aerial Photographs (taken within the previous 12 months) ❑ Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments & sketches) No,___Z_C-- JAN 13 2CV4 ❑ Seven (7) Traffic Impact Statement (TIS), or waiver ❑ Four (4) Historical and Archeological Survey, or waiver ❑ Copies of State and/or Federal Permits ❑ Four (4) Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s) Pre - application Fee $300.00 (to be credited toward application fee below) [� Fees: $2000.00* Application Fee $25.00 Data Conversion $150.00 Fire Code Review ❑ $1600.00 EIS Review, if required *$750.00 if filed in conjunction with a rezone petition OTHER REQUIREMENTS: ® i��o,._aE Cot j v —1 r-o pilr ,o_ �u %(l.c- Wi�Sav,fv G,..F �t �t�4� �/ �.1, , 3S. (�.2i NOTES: — SL�W�ed Uhl ��o• �tiw.•��ed saw-- Agpi�c&ys ti 1.4 r.._,_ dcd Ali CLt no .1&.N.;0' n1' l �i L A �j A ` ( l /Th TV � D' T"f 1 �Cc Agent/Owner Signature Date: JAN 13 2004 2 06/22/2003 15:26 659572' ADDRESSING PAGE 01 Jun 17 2003 2:00PH .....nmons 6 Company 863 J1603 p.3 ADDRDESINO CKRCKLIST Please complete the following )mod, submit to the, Addressing Section for Review. Not all items will 1221v to every gmiect Items In bold tvlle are rgguirad. 1, Lwl description of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) 2. Folio (PLr12-, erty XD) number(s) above (attach to, or associate with, legal escription If more than one) D U Q (S L�0 US 3. Street address or addresses as applicable, tfalready tswalgnad) �cu5 'a. W24 aaci - 4. Location map, showing axaot location. of project/site in relation to nearest public road right -of- -way (attach) S. Copy of survey (Nl3BDED ONLY POP, UNPLATTED PROPERTIE S) 6. Proposed roject nerve (f applicable) 7. Pmpos q Street names (If applicable) 1P ' 8. Site Development Plan Number (POP. WASTING PROJECTS /SITES ONLY) SDP 9. Petition Type — (CompIcto a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition Type) 0 SDP (Site Development Plan) O PPL (Plana & Plat Review) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ SDPI (SDP Ineubstandal Change) 13 FP (Final Plat) O SIP (Site Improvement Plan) D LL.A (Lot Lino Adjustment) Cl SIPA (SIP Amendment) ❑ BL (Bissting Permit) ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) Q ROW (Right -of -Way Permit) ❑,Vcgetation/Exotic (Veg. Removal Permits) ❑ BXP (Excavation Permit) Land Use Petition (Variance, Conditional Use, ❑ VKSFP (Veg. Removal & Site Fill Permit) Boat Dock Bxt., Rezone, PUD rezone, etc.) O Other - Describe: 10. Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, oondomintum documents (if appUcablo; iadlcate whether proposed or existing) 121,,4 11. Please Check One; Checklist is to be Faxed Hack D Personally Picked Up 12. Appllesat Name P, n u tt T v W cry, 1!1C • Phone M1 - PS S --mar -� ' {V_ /m. 13. Signature on Addressing Checklist doom not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and it subject to flusher revim by the Addressing Section, FOR STAFF USE ONLY RECEIVED Primary Number 1'1.7 31 Addreea Number Addreas Numbcr Address Number Approved by ,, ��iQ.,, -, Date C, - IS - Plo.� JAN 13 2004 Pg. o?( - - - -- Original Message - - - -- " From: Will Kriz [mailto:wckriz @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:07 PM To: Donna Fiala Cc: Keith Tompkins Subject: 800 Foot Tower Dear Ms. Fiala, I am sending this message because of my objection to the location of a proposed 800' tall tower on Tower Road, immediately west of SR 951 and south of the Eagle Creek community. I realize that any project associated with "Homeland Security" is hard to argue with. And, for that reason, I do not want to risk standing in front of the Board of County Commissioners and possibly be criticized and therefore embarrassed. I am not against the tower, just it's location. I request that you ask the U.S. Coast Guard (or the contractor building the tower) to find another place that is less congested with residents. Another site that is more isolated and poses less impact on the many residents who live in adjacent Holiday Manor, Manatee Road, Eagle Creek, and who will live at Lands End would be much better. 800' of blinking red lights, in addition to the two current towers of blinking red lights, will negatively impact the numerous neighbors. We are aware of other more isolated tower locations in the area. Additionally, I cannot speak for the Marco Airport, but, helicopters and airplanes about to land or take off should be quite concerned about the 800' height. As you recall, several years ago a plane landing at the airport hit an existing tower guy wire, crashed, and two people died. Parts of the airplane landed on the Eagle Creek golf course, very close to homes. At 800' the proposed tower is even taller than the one the airplane crashed into. And incidently, that tower has since been lowered as we understand at the request of the Federal Aviation Administration. So, all things considered, i.e., safety, blinking lights, affect on the residents and inappropriate citing of the tower lead me to think that it should be placed elsewhere. I would like the Commission to suggest to the builder to come back to them with another location for consideration. Please accept my many thanks for this and the good job you are doing overall. Sincerely, Carolyn Kriz 732 -1982 No.---7—C- JAN 13 2004 pg•_ al - Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH Aviation Office GOVERNOR 605 Suwannee Street, MS -46 Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0450 September 25, 2003 Mr. Cesar I. Perez FAA — Southern Regional Office 1701 Columbia Avenue – ASO -520 College Park, GA 30337 Re: Aeronautical Study #2003 -ASO- 2902 -OE Proposed Antenna Tower 724 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) Dear Mr. Perez: JOSE Ar SECRETAm% The State of Florida, Department of Transportation objects to the proposed tower as described in FAA Aeronautical Study #2003 -ASO- 2902 -OE. The 724 -foot above mean sea level (AMSL) antenna tower lies within a VFR route between Naples Municipal Airport (APF) and Marco Island Airport (MKY) that supports a high degree of VFR air traffic. Pursuant to FAA Order 7400.2E Change 2, `A structure would have a adverse effect upon VFR navigation if its height is greater than 500 feet above the surface at its site, and within 2 statute miles of any regularly used VFR route." The proposed antenna tower coordinates will place the tower within one (1) mile of the above - mentioned VFR route. Both Naples Municipal Airport (APF) and Marco Island Airport (MKY) support a significant number of flight operations. In fact, APF is one of the busiest airports in southwestern Florida, with a total of 138,185 annual operations for 2( This includes over 92,000 itinerant operations and over 30,000 local operations. MKY, a general /corporate aviai—, airport, had a total of 14,580 annual operations in 2002. This includes over 10,000 itinerant operations and over 4,000 local operations. Due to Florida's weather pattern, most of the flights conducted on this VFR route are during VFR conditions and perhaps marginal VFR conditions. Geography also plays a significant role, considering the entire area is surrounded by the Everglades to the east and the Gulf of Mexico to the west. This VFR route continues on to Everglades Airport (X01), the most southwestern airport on the mainland of Florida, where a significant amount of sport fishing and Everglade's tourism is conducted. Since MKY and X01 are the two most southwestern airports on mainland Florida, a majority of VFR flights are conducted on the above - mentioned VFR route. Though, a 707 -foot AMSL antenna tower exists in close proximity to this proposal, the cumulative impact resulting from the proposed structure when combined with the impact of the existing structure would not be acceptable to the Department. If you have any questions, please feel fee to contact Aaron Smith or myself at 850 - 414 -4500. cc: Mr. Wayne Chewing, Aviation, FDOT District 1 Office Mr. Theodore Soliday, Naples Municipal Airport Mr. Robert Tweedie, Marco Island Airport Mr. Ray Bellows, Chief Planner, Collier County Ms. Janis E. Merritts, Pinnacle Towers Inc. tAlp� �&tl<E 8 ©S' vwvw.dot.state.fl.us r No. C- JAN 13 2004 pt. -a 8 ® RECYCLED PAPER RESOLUTION NO. 04- RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA- 2003 -AR- 4525 FOR: A VARIANCE OF 690 FEET FROM THE REQUIRED MINIMUM SEPERATION REQUIREMENT OF 1,750 FEET TO 1,060 FEET FROM THE REQUIRED RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT SETBACK, A VARIANCE OF 450 FEET FROM THE REQUIRED MAXIMUM HEIGHT LIMITATION OF 250 FEET TO 700 FEET FOR TOWERS IN AN AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT, AND A VARIANCE OF 6 -FEET FROM THE REQUIRED 30 FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK TO 24 FEET FOR A SINGLE GUYED WIRED ANCHOR POINT IN AN AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals; being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of the following variance requests: a 690 -foot variance from the required residential zoning district setback of 1,750 feet to 1,060 feet, a 450 -foot variance from the required 250 -foot height limitation to 700 feet, and a 6 -foot variance from the required 30 -foot side yard setback to 24 feet, as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "B ", in an Agricultural Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition VA- 2003 -AR -4525 filed by James B. Malless, AICP, of Wireless Planning Services, LLC, representing Pinnacle Towers, Incorporated, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "A" PIM -7 _- JAN 13 2004 be and the same hereby is approved for the following variances: a 690 —foot variance from the required 1,750 yard setback to 1060 feet, a 450 -foot variance from the required 250 -foot height limitation to 700 feet, and a 6- -foot variance from the required 30 -foot side yard setback to 24 feet, as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit 'B ", in the Agricultural Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: 1. These variances are for the variances shown in Exhibit `B" only. Any other variance shall require a separate petition and hearing. 2. In case of the destruction of the tower, for any reason, the tower may be replaced with the dimensional variances expressed within the petition, contingent that the conditions of petition CU- 2003 -AR -4524 are still being satisfied. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number VA- 2003-AR-4525 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of , 2004. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK `COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Marjori M. Student Assistant County Attorney V A- 2003- AR4525/MRA0 -2- , CHAIRMAN JAPE 13 2004 Pg JD OR: 2324 PG: 3249 A tract of land in the Southwest a.111of certain tracts described5 n Official Records Book Collier County, Florida, being 165, Pages 54 and 56 of the deed records of said Collier County, Florida. Said tract of land being more particularly described as follows: _ Commencing at the southwest corner of said Section 3; thence along the West line of said Section 3 North 00 °00'15" West, 920.69 feet to a concrete monument found at the Northwest corner of a certain tract of land described as "General TV Tract" in said Official Records Book 165, Page 54; thence along the Northerly line of said "General TV Tract" and parallel with the South line of said Section 3, South 89052'30" East, 799.84 feet to a concrete monument found for the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along the Easterly line of the land described in said Official Records Book 165, Pages 54 and 56, South 00 000'15" East, 604.76 feet to an iron pin set in the Northerly right - of -way line of Tower Road for the Southeast corner of tract herein described; thence along said Northerly right -of -way line, the following five (5) courses: (1) South 75026'40" West, 21.01 feet to an iron pin set; (2) along a curve, concave to the Southeast whose elements are: central angle of 59 020'09 ", radius of 105.00 feet, arc length of 108.74 feet and a chord that bears South 45 °4436" West, 103.94 feet to an iron pin set; (3) South 16 004'49" West, 183.34 feet to an iron pin set; (4) along a curve, concave to the Northwest, whose elements are: central angle of 74 004'31 ", radius of 45.00 feet, arc length of 58.18 feet and a chord that bears South 53 °10'20" West, 54.21 feet to an iron pin set; (5) North 89148'15" West, 341.90 feet to a concrete monument found at the Southwest corner of a certain Parcel "A' described in said Official Records Book 165, Page 55; thence along the Westerly line of said Parcel "A ", North 00 °03'32" West, 178.61 feet to an iron pin set at the Northwest corner of said Parcel "A ", being also in the Southerly line of said "General TV Tract "; thence along said Southerly line North 89 047'21" West 268.79 feet to a concrete monument found at the Southwest corner of said "General TV Tract ", also being in the West line of said Section 3, being also the Southwest corner of said tract herein described; thence along said Section line, being also the Westerly line of said "General TV Tract ", North 00 000'15" West, 712.23 feet to a concrete monument found at the Northwest corner of said "General TV Tract ", being also the Northwest corner of the tract herein described; thence along the Northerly line of said "General TV Tract" and parallel with the South line of said Section 3, South 89 052'30" East, 799.84 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. NM JAN 13 2004 06/16187 (12:509)MY1611 Or CADri zJ 13 2004 Ile rig T 13 2004 Fi rig T 13 2004 Fi 13 2004 Federal Aviation Administration Southern Regional Office. 1701 Columbia Avenue -ASO -520 College Park, GA 30337 Issued bate: 11/4/2003 JAMS E. MERRITTS, FAA %FCC COMPLIANCE PINNACLE TOWERS INC. 301 N. CATTLEMEN RD., SUITE 300 SARASOTA, FL 34232 -6427 Aeronautical Study No. 2003 -ASO- 2902 -OE ** DETEREiINATIOX OF NO HAZARD TO AIR NAVIGATION ** 0// 7-001/ The Federal Aviation Administration has completed an aeronautical study under the provisions of 49 U.S.C., Section 44718 and, if applicable, Title 14 of the code of 'Ftderal Regulations,' part 7 concterning: Structure Type: Antenna Tower Location: NAPLES, FL Latitude: 26 -3 -11.32 NAD•83 Longitude: 81 -42 -10.4 Heights: 527 feet above ground level (AGL) 531 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) This aeronautical study revealed that the structure would have no substantial adverse effect on the safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of air navigation facilities. Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, it is hereby determined that the structure would not be a hazard to air navigation provided the following condition(s) is(are) met: As a condition to this Determination, the structure should be marked and /or lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1 AC 70/7460 -iK Change 1, Qb .px, ctioA_.Urking and_Lighting,.. p�iast�+lr 3(Marked),4,5(Red), &12. It is required that the enclosed FAA Form 7460 -2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be completed and returned to this office any time the project is abandoned or: —X_ At least 10 days prior to start of construction (7460 -2, Part I) ^X, Within 5 days after the construction reaches its greatest height (7460 -2, Part II) As a result of this structure being critical to flight safety, it is required that the FAA be kept appraised as to the status of the project_ Failure to respond to periodic FAA inquiries could invalidate this determination. To coordinate frequency activation and verify that no interference is caused to FAA facilities, prior to beginning any transmission from the site you must contact Pim Williams at 305 - 526 -2177. See attachment for additional condition(s) or information. This determination expires on 5/4/2005 unless: -` Page 1 500 /T00'd T60Z# £ JAN 13 22A f. ,3 3 (a) extended, revised or terminated by the issuing office. (b) the construction is subject to the licensing authority of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and an application for a construction permit has been filed , as required by the FCC, within 6 months of the date of this determination. In such case, the determination expires on the date prescribed by the FCC for completion of construction, or the date the FCC denies the application.. NOTE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED To THIS OFFICE AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE. This determination is subject to review if an interested party files a petition on or before 12/4/2003. In the event a petition for review is filed, it must contain a full statement of the basis upon which it is made and be submitted in ` triplicate to the Manager, Airspace-$ranch, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C. 20591. This determination becomes final on 12/1412003 unless a petition is timely filed. In which case, this determination will not become final pending disposition of the petition. Interested parties will be notified of the grant of any review. This determination is based, in part, on the foregoing description which includes specific coordinates, heights, frequency(ies) and power. Any changes in coordinates, heights, and frequencies or use of greater power will void this determination. Any future construction or alteration, including increase to heights, power, or the addition of other transmitters, requires separate notice to the FAA. This determination does include temporary construction equipment such as cranes, derricks, etc_, which may be used during actual construction of the structure. However, this equipment shall not exceed the overall heights as indicated above. Equipment which has a height greater than the studied structure requires separate notice to the FAA. J ...,,.►- -- --anew This determination concerns the effect of this structure on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and does not relieve the sponsor of compliance responsibilities relating to any law, ordinance, or regulation of any Federal, State, or local government body. This aeronautical study considered and analyzed the impact on existing and proposed arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under both visual flight rules and instrument flight rules; the impact on all existing and planned public -use airports, military airports and aeronautical facilities; and the cumulative impact resulting from the studied structure when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed structures. The study disclosed that the described structure would have no substantial adverse effect on air navigation. An account of the study findings, aeronautical objectiorl.s received by the FAA during the study (if any), and the basis for the FAA's decision in this matter can be found on the following page(s). A copy of this determination will be forwarded to the Federal Communications Commission if the structure is subject to their licensing' authority. Page 2 900 /Z00'9 T60Z# JAN 13 211,,- 3 £ OT�60�- �L'nna Pt ff we can be of further assistance, please contact our office at (404)305 -5589. On any future correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to 7-00'/ Aeronautical Study Number 2003 -ASO- 2902 -OE. `Signature Control No: 346348- 227941 DNA Cesar I. Perez specialist Attachment(S) Additional Information Frequency Data 0 Page 3 Ad"A,rM No. C JAN 13 2004 500 /£00'd T60Z# ££:OT £OOZ.6T'nOH Additional Information for ASN 2003 -ASO- 1902 -0E nf/ 7-00'Y The proposed structure would be located approximately 3.84 nautical miles northwest of the Marco Island Airport (MKY) airport reference. The structure, as proposed, will exceed the standard for determining obstructions to air navigation contained in Part 17, Subpart C, of the Federal Aviation Regulations as follows: Exceeds FAR Part 77.23 (a)(1) by 27 feet, its height exceeding 500 feet AGL at its site. Exceeds FAR Part 77.23 (a)(2) by 255 feet, its height more than 272,feet above ground level (AGL), at its site with respect to the MKY Airport one letter of objection was received in response to circularization of the details of this proposed structure from the aeronautical public by letter dated September 25, 2003. This letter offobjection may be summarized as objecting to the proposal because it would be located within the vertical /horizontal confines of a regularly used VFR flyway (route). Successful negotiations with the proponent resulted in an agreement to lower the proposed structure to 527 feet AGL /531 AMSL. At this reduced height this structure would be located approximately 36 feet from a previously studied tower at the same AGL height and one foot higher AMSL (532 feet), and would therefore not have a greater effect on aircraft operations. The proposed structure was found to have no adverse effect on the VFR airport traffic patterns in the vicinity of the site. The impact on arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under VFR /IFR conditions at existing and planned public use airports, as well as aeronautical facilities, was considered during the analysis of the structure. The aeronautical study disclosed that the structure, at a height of 531 feet above mean sea level (AMSL), would have no adverse effect upon any terminal or en route instrument procedure or altitude. The cumulative impact resulting from the structure, when combined with the impact of other existing or proposed structures was considered and found to be acceptable. Therefore, it is determined that the structure will have no substantial adverse effect upon the safe and efficient utilization of the navigable airspace by aircraft or on the operation of navigational facilities and will not be a hazard to air navigation. OF Page 4 500 /W*d T60Z# JAN 13 2004 ££:0T £002.6T'AON - AGENDAITIEM No.- 7 C-- _ . JAN 13 Page 5 900 /900'd T60Z# DE =01 c00Z.6T'A011 Prequency Data for ASN 2003 -ASO- 2902 -0E Q117-9e/ LOW 8IO8 FMUSNCY ERP FREQMMCY FREQIIENCY UNIT ERP UNIT 411.7875 0 Mii2 .2 Kw 412.975 0 MHz .2 KW 413.025 0 MHz .2 KW 414.0375 0 MHz .2 KW - 410.2375 0 MHz .2 KW 156.3 0 MHz 2 . KW 156.6 0 MHz •2 KW 156.8 0 MHz .2 KW 157.05 0 MHz .2 Kw 157.075 0 MHz .2 Kw 157.1 0 MHz .2 KW 1s7.1s 0 MHz .2 Kw 157.175 0 MHz .2 KW 155.475 0 MHz .2 KW 162.325 0 MHz .2 Kw 163.05 0 MHz .2 KW . 164.55 0 MHz .2 KW 172.3125 0 MHz .2 KW 167.0975 0 MHz .2 KW 169.5375 -- _ p - - -�.r_. 2,_....___ 165.3375 0 MHz .2 KW 164.7125 0 MH2 .2 KW - AGENDAITIEM No.- 7 C-- _ . JAN 13 Page 5 900 /900'd T60Z# DE =01 c00Z.6T'A011 EXECUTIVE SUNLNIARY ApPOE --F] TENT OF MEMBER(S) TO Tf tE LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD OBJECTIVE: To appoint 2 members to fulfill the remainder of vacant terms, to the Library Advisory Board. CONSIDERATIONS: This 5 member board advises the Board of County Commissioners on the operations and proposed budget for the Collier County Library System Members are required to file a Form 1 Statement of Financial Interest each year with the Supervisor of Elections. Terms are 4 years. A list of the current membership is included in the backup. Resignations were received from Jaculyn K. Dering (District 2) and Dianne Wetjen (District 1). A press release was issued and resumes were received from the following 4 interested citizens: APPLICANT CATEGORY Joan M. Robbins Commission District I _ Loretta Murray Commission District I_ Andrew H. Reiss Commission District 2 Donna Connolly Commission District COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: FISCAL IMPACT: NONE DIS'I' ELECTOR ADV. COMM. I I Yes Yes None None 2 Yes None 2 � -Yes None District i - Joan M. Robbins, expiring 12/31/06 District 2 - Andrew H. Reiss, expiring, 12/31/04 GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPAC'II- `;ONE RECOMMENDATION: That the Board t County Commissioners consider the recommendation for appointment, appoint _' members, and direct the County Attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the appointment- Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive ti .:.a:cr Board of County Commissioners Agenda Date: JANUARY 13, 2004 AGENDA ITEM N0. jk `y%OA Pg. 1 LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD COWER COUNTY PUBLK LIBRARY 2385 Orange Blossom Drive Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 593 -3511 'XWW. collier -lib. org December 11, 2003 Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government Center 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Dear Sue: The Library Advisory Board met yesterday 12/10/03. Flee lioard unanimously voted to recommend the following: Joan M. Robbins to represent District 1 and Andrew H. Reiss to represent District 2. Sincerely, J { Doris J. Lewis Chairman, Library Advisory Board AGENDA ITEM CIO. C Library Advisory Board e v' Derin � Ms. Jaculyn K. g 6508 Thomas Jefferson Court Naples, FL 34108 E-41ail: District: 2 Category: Ms. Diane Williams Rt. 2, BOX 18 Immokalee, FL 34142 E- Alail: District: 5 Category: - QS�S� q3 Ms. Dianne Wetjen 0", 1690 Rainbow Court Marco Island, FL 34145 E- ,hail: rainbodial @aol.com District: 1 Category: Ms. Sabina Musci 4470 32nd Avenue, S.W. Naples, FL 34116 E- :Mail: District: 3 Category: ti ednesday, .1fay 28, 2003 12/22/92 592 -0180 01/09/01 06/17/97 657 -4171 01; 09/01 05/27/03 642 -7820 643 -2324 12/13/94 12/ 17/02 Pagel of 12/31/96 12/31/04 12/31/00 12/31/04 12/31/06 12/31/98 12/31/06 4 Years 4 Years 4 Years 4 Years 4 Years 4 Years 4 Years AGENDA ITEM 1~10. pg. 3 Work Phone 9ppt'd Eat Date Perm Vanze Home Phone DateRe -appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term 403 -6702 O1 /09 /O1 12/31/04 4 Years Ms_ Doris J. Lewis 94 Second Street South 261 -8754 Naples, FL 34102 E- ,Vail: District: 4 Category: e v' Derin � Ms. Jaculyn K. g 6508 Thomas Jefferson Court Naples, FL 34108 E-41ail: District: 2 Category: Ms. Diane Williams Rt. 2, BOX 18 Immokalee, FL 34142 E- Alail: District: 5 Category: - QS�S� q3 Ms. Dianne Wetjen 0", 1690 Rainbow Court Marco Island, FL 34145 E- ,hail: rainbodial @aol.com District: 1 Category: Ms. Sabina Musci 4470 32nd Avenue, S.W. Naples, FL 34116 E- :Mail: District: 3 Category: ti ednesday, .1fay 28, 2003 12/22/92 592 -0180 01/09/01 06/17/97 657 -4171 01; 09/01 05/27/03 642 -7820 643 -2324 12/13/94 12/ 17/02 Pagel of 12/31/96 12/31/04 12/31/00 12/31/04 12/31/06 12/31/98 12/31/06 4 Years 4 Years 4 Years 4 Years 4 Years 4 Years 4 Years AGENDA ITEM 1~10. pg. 3 Library Advisory Board Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term Name Home Phone DateRe -appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term This 5 member committee was created by Ord. No. 88 -71 to advise the Board of County Commissioners on the operations and proposed budget for the Collier County Library System. Members are composed of 5 members representing the 5 commission districts. Terms are 4 years. FL STAT Staff. John Jones, Library Director. 774 -8486 Wednesday, ,Vay 28, 2003 Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM _gfi J 3-A 3 , Pg. MEMORANDUM 2Q03 OCT 13 PH 3.08 DATE: October 10, 2003 �U� i� t`dP , ;;a •C . L CTt ©tJS CULIF,R CO. FL. TO: Elections Office FROM: Sue Filson Executive Manage ' g Board of County Commissioners RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are registered voters in Collier County. Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides. LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD Joan M. Robbins 901 Collier Court, 4606 Marco Island, FL 34145 Loretta Murray 9087 Michael Circle 41 Naples, FL 34113 Andrew H. Reiss 7085 Timberland Circle Naples, FL 34109 Donna Connolly 197 Eugenia Drive Naples. FL 34108 Thank you for your help. COMMISSION DISTRICT "",z AGIND fTEM NO. A MENIOR AND UM DATE: October 10, 2003 TO: John Jones, Library Director FROM: Sue Filson. Executive Manager Board of County Commissionekj' RE: Library Advisory Board As you know, we currently have vacancies on the above - referenced advisory committee. A press release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows: Joan M. Robbins 901 Collier Court, 9606 Marco Island, FL 34145 Loretta Murray 9087 Michael Circle #I Naples, FL 34113 Andrew H. Reiss 7085 Timberland Circle Naples, FL 34109 Donna Connolly 197 Eugenia Drive Naples, FL 34108 Please let me know, in writing, the recornm ndation for appointment of the advisory committee within the 41 day time -frame, and I will prLr:vre an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Please categorize the applicants in are-.is )f expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at 774 -8097. Thank you for your attention to this matter. SF Attachments AGENDA GEM M ®. M '..� trn f r g' -- Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (941) 774 -8097 Fax: (941) 774 -3602 Application for Advisory Committees /Boards Name: Joan M. Robbins Home Phone: 239.389.9404 Home Address:901 Collier Court #606 Marco Island, FL Zip Code:_34145 Fax No. Business: Retired Business Phone: e-mail address :_jrobbins @marcocable.com Board or Committee Applied for:_Library Advisory Board Category (if applicable): Example: Commission District, Developer, environmentalist, lay person, etc. Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes_XXX No Do you currently hold public office? Yes If so, what is that office? No _XXX Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier County board or committee? Yes _XYX If yes, please list the committees boards: No Please list your community activities (civic clubs, neighborhood associations, etc. and positions held:_ Marco Island Civic Association (joined 9/03) Education: See enclosed resume Experience:—See enclosed resume 1`, ! ,�! 901 Colder Court #606 Marco Island, FL 34145 October 3, 2003 Ms. Sue Filson Executive Manager to the Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trait Naples, FL 34112 Dear Ms. Filson, I have recently retired and re- located to Marco Island from New Jersey where I was a school library media specialist for over twenty -five years. Since I believe libraries and library services are critically important in helping people access and use information in this increasingly technological society, I am interested in the advertised vacancy on the Library Advisory Board. I have a tong history of service in New Jersey as a volunteer on boards and commissions related to libraries and education, in both elected and appointed capacities. The New Jersey Library Network is a consortium of multi -type libraries (public, school, academic, special, and institutional) comprised of four Regional Library Cooperatives. I was elected to serve on the Board of the South Jersey Regional Library Cooperative for a total of eight years, filling the offices of secretary, vice- president, and president at various times. The Board planned services for the patrons of member libraries, and developed and administered a $1 million dollar annual budget. I was also elected to represent the South Jersey Regional Library Cooperative on the Library Network Review Board for the New Jersey State Library for three years. For fifteen years, I served on the Atlantic County Audio - Visual Aids Commission, which provides shared access to educational technology and Internet connectivity for all the school districts in Atlantic County, holding the position of chairperson since 1998 until I retired in June of this year. Although most of my work experience has been confined to a school library setting, I have a global view of libraries and library and information services garnered from my exposure to multi -type libraries through volunteer board and commission memberships. I worked closely with the director of the Atlantic County Public Library during my tenure on the Atlantic County AVA Commission, and served on committees of the South Jersey Library Regional Library Cooperative with many public library directors on projects that benefited public library patrons. I would like to be considered for appointment to the Library Advisory Board, and will supply references upon request. Please contact me if you need further information, or to schedule an interview. Yours truly, Joan M. Robbins "S.CIv'NDA- IT M ! r ^11 901 Collier Court #606 239 - 389 -9404 Marco Island, FL 34145 jmrfl @marcocable.com .loan Robbins Experience 1981 -2003 Hammonton High School Hammonton, NJ Library Media Specialist • Conducted bibliographic instruction and computer literacy skills instruction across all areas of the curriculum. • Conducted faculty in- service and workshops in computer applications and technology integration into the curriculum. March, 2000 -2003 Richard Stockton College of NJ Pomona, NJ Instructor, Alternate Route Certification • Taught sessions on informational and educational technology, including evaluating software and websites to individuals seeking NJ teacher certification. February, 2001 -June 2003 Millville School District Millville, NJ Technology Trainer -ACE Program • Taught introduction to computers, Microsoft computer applications, and basic Internet skills to elementary school students in after - school enrichment classes. • Taught introduction to computers, Microsoft computer applications, and basic Internet navigational, communication and search skills to adults with limited or no access to computers. 1978 -1981 Buena Regional High School Buena, NJ Library Media Specialist • Conducted bibliographic instruction in all curricular areas Education ■ 1982 -2001 Forty-five post - graduate credits in supervision, effective teaching, learning styles, computer literacy and technology integration from Rutgers, Jersey City State, SL Peter's College, Rowan University, the Fielding Institute and the College of New Jersey. ■ 1980 M. A. in Library Education, Glassboro State, Glassboro, NJ ■ 1966 B. A. in French and English, Old Dominion, Norfolk, VA Certificates Held References New Jersey Supervisor, New Jersey Educational Media Specialist, New Jersey Public Librarian. Available upon request AAe.END A 3TEM Professional Volunteer Experience • South Jersey Regional Library Cooperative Board - 1989 -1995, 2001 -2003 • NJ Library Network Review Board - 1995 -1998 • Atlantic County AVA Commission - 1988 -2003 Professional Memberships • NEA, NJEA, HEA • New Jersey Library Association • Educational Media Association of New Jersey AGENDA ITEM Po �Je Board of Count-,. Commissioners 33111 l :tst l-amiami 'I N .; » €t . 1=L 3,41 13 1b Application for Adv ison. Cominittees[Boards Name: Z,,-W, T% k Home Phone: q Home Address: % r h CJ1 Q (t�, I C/ C d- e- #Zip Code: -3 T I/J Fax No.? 7- Business Phone: e-mail address: bobs a 115 C) /)15A1• Lam'/ Business: / Board or Committee Applied for: G / J1,/4'�' V A--i !'� /5 ��r f C/� � Category (if applicable): /,d y / ",t� A Example: Commission District, Developer, eavitonn —tA O, my person, etc Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Do you currently hold public office? Yes If so, what is that office? Yes__ ,/No No Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier County board or committee? Yes If yes, please fist the committees/boards: No Please list your community activities (civic clubs, neighborhood associations, etc. and positions held: CAST IUAPL65 L- / V /C'- i�S��C iQT /v.�ti� � 'eds-r 4 Pz-6 K I x,1,9 N i s 7' 13�ff 5 z.4 r'G K • ,V G Z— 6c'E 'i° p A;r ,- Uzz- CEP, IV 14 P& 5 -!1(? E ^t- 6 relo / E /y1E�E' G•�nit�y cS PoN Education: SCNOOZ- DL4 4 T pg. Lr Please attach any additional information yon feel pertinent. This apphczwn shotdd be forwarded to Sue Filson Board of County Cammissionerr, 3301 East Tmniani Trail, Naples, FL 34111. Ifyou wah, please fax your appLication to (941) 774 -3601 or e mail to s u elii, o r :z : ei i r u , - r T hank you for voleaeffing to serve the eiti;.oss of Collier County. lekl. Hoo L,-�- ,r,, �„ > G�ld J ��t �,�r'.;ir. uss;r Ali: �� i n1'I iii VQ rp )/2s L Bogard of County Commissioners 3301 Last Tamismi Trail Naples, FL 34112 (941) 774 -8097 Fax: (941) 774 -3602 Application for Advisory Committees/Boards Name: Andrew H. Reiss Rome Phone: 596 -2187 Home Address: 7085 Timberland Cir. , 'N'aples Zip Code: 34109 Fax No. Business Phone: 251 -9300 a -:nail address: ahreiss @napleslaw.com Bnsipesv Attorney Board or Committee Applied for., Library Advisory Board Category (if applicable): Commission District 2 Example: Commissloa District, Developer, environmentallst, by person, etc. Are you a registered voter in Collier County; Yes X No Do you currently hold public office? Yes No X If so, what is that office? Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Coil;cr , —unry board or committee? Yes X No If yes, please list the comminces/boards: Forest Lakes Roadway & Drainage ,Advisory Committee Served 2000 -2001 before resigning because—no longer lived in the boundaries. Please list your community activities (civic clubs, neighborhood associations, etc. and positions held: ___ 1) University of Pennsylvania Club - VP and Legal Counsel 2) Collier Co. Bar Assoc. Ygaa ?_awyer's Div. - Member of charitable activities committee 3) High school mock trial prog:-.-Lm - attorney coach for Community School Education: J.D. - University of Miami School of Law - 1997 B.A. - University of Pennsylvania +'Political science) - 1991 Experience: 1991 -1994 - English teacher School (Ft. Lauderdale) 1997 -2000 - Attorney - Litigation department of Treiser, Kobza & Lieberfarb 2000- Present - Attorney - Litistion department of Cheffy Passidomo Wilson & Johnson `+ ' t Pd. 19— Donna Connolly, C.P.A. 197 Eugenia Drive Naples, Florida 34108 239 -592 -1038 September 7, 2003 Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government Center 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, F134112 -4977 Commissioners: It is with sincere pleasure that I submit this letter along with my application for a position as the District 2 Representative on the Collier County Library Advisory Board. It would be a privilege to serve the community in this capacity and I believe that my enthusiasm, commitment and personal experience will bring added value. The public library system provides the community the most fundamental opportunities for educational and cultural enlightenment. It affords all citizens, irrespective of personal wealth and stature, a venue within which to expand knowledge and exchange ideas. As a current member of the School Advisory Council at Barron Collier High School and a parent of three school aged children, I have always recognized the important educational opportunity that our public library offers. I recognize that this begins first and foremost with attracting our young people into the library. I believe that once we draw them into the world of books, the world is literally theirs. The continued role of the library as a resource to our public schools is unlimited. Our public library also furnishes a platform for continuing education, cultural, environmental and political awareness. It creates an atmosphere that can foster growth through positive discourse. Collier County has provided its community with architecturally beautiful surroundings that pave the way to further the library's mission. It would be an honor and a privilege for me to become part of that goal. Sincerely, L AGENDA ITEM I " { 3 21044 pg. Q Collier County Home [ BCC I Application for Advisory Committees/Boards Page 1 of 2 Board of County Commissioners t i last fgriiami T-ai! t :apses, L 34i It t239) "74 -8097 4 Application for Addis pry Cnra.mitteefRoards Name: Vt V%. 0-, O'cJ K V_ 0 (? /�� Phone: Home t 3 1 , q .P Z /0 3,9 Home Address: 19 N %�:T Zip Code: ;3?p- 9y�7 Fax No. Al /'A' Business Phone: N /R e-mail address: 7 i)Ons ' �r�,�y c c204(fr t') Business: P7 - -(�Y- -eCf Board or Committee Applied for: 4- i b ,-a.r-,1 afyiso � l art r-d, b i5 Catagory (f applicable). Example: Commission District environmentalist, lay person, etc. Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes No Do you currently hold public office ? Yes No If so, what is that office ? Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier County board or Committee? Yes No If yes, please list the committees/boards: 1 Education: /� % 2p� ' / 1 ( /�(C1T�f( -R` �G T S ) �� ,'/ / i AcG C u G' y 7l Lj Y z Experience: k q , (f :/--O 3 2004 Please attach any additional information you feel pertinent. This application should be lorwarded to Sue Fil_wn, A-421ve 1 � t Tanager to the Board of County Commissioners, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 31112. If you wish, pfd application to (941) 774 -3601 or e-mail to ;:;. ,` s.;: r - II - — ; Countv. ;. T j,tirk you for volunteering to serve are citizens of Collier http: / /www.cotliergov.netlbec /advisory%20application.htm 9/3/2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPOINTMENT OF NIETNIBER(S) TO THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY COMMITTEE OBJECTIVE: To appoint 3 members to serve 2 year terms, commencing February 4, 2004 and expiring February 4, 2006, and 1 member to fulfill the remainder of a vacant term expiring February 4, 2005, to the County Government Productivity Committee. CONSIDERATIONS: This committee is composed of 11 members, with the vice chair of the Board of County Commissioners serving in a liaison capacity. The members are appointed by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners for a two -year term and must be permanent residents and electors of Collier County. Committee members are required to possess special expertise and experience related to managing large organizations, and must be balanced in representing the views of the community. The committee reviews the efficiency of departments of County Government under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners. The committee may analyze and review existing structure, organization, staffing, management, functions, business practices, and procedures of any or all parts of county government and make recommendations for increased efficiency and cost - effectiveness. The committee may also assist in the implementation of those recommendations. A list of the current membership is included in the backup. The terms for Janet Vasey, Joseph B. Swaja, James R. Gibson, Jr., James T. Horner, and Dexter R. Groose will expire on February 4, 2004. There are 2 additional vacancies due to the resignations of Richard Schmidt and James C. Ray, Jr. A pros lease was issued and resumes were received from the following 4 interested citizens: APPLICANT CATEGORY DIST ELECTOR ADV. COMM. Janet Vasey Budget; Financial & Program Analysis 3 Yes I Revenue Commission REAPPT I Productivity Committee Dexter R. Groose Performance & Value Analysis 2 Yes Productivity Committee REAPPT Livingston Rd MSTU Joseph B. Swaja Development of Strategic Objectives I Yes Productivity Committee REAPPT Helen C. Philbin Government, Budget, Zoning I Yes None Compliance COMMITTEE RECOM,4ENDATION: Janet Vasey — Reappointment expiring 2/4/06 Dexter R. Groose - Reappointment expiring 2/4/06 Joseph B. Swaja —Reappointment expiring 2/4/06 Helen C. Philbin — New Appt. expiring 2/4/05 NOTE: Section Seven (B) of Ordinance 2001 -55 states "Terms of office for Board members shall be limited to two consecutive terms of service on any one Board..." Under (D) of the same section, it is noted that `By a unanimous vote of the Commission, the limitations set forth in subsection (B) above may be waived ". According to available records, Janet Vasey has served 3 consecutive terms. Should the Board wish to re- appoint Ms. Vasey, the limitations on two consecutive terms will need to �.., be waived. AGENDA ITEM NO. g 2� 3 �.nn i� I Liu g. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NOME RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the recommendation for appointment, appoint 4 members, and direct the County Attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the appointments. Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners Agenda Date: JANUARY 13, 2004 nGEND IT list 1 A N 32u! pg. 02 . MEMORANDUM�� TO: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners FROM: Winona Stone, ssistant to the County Manager DATE: December 17, 2003 SUBJECT: Productivity Committee Recommendation to the Board for Filling Vacant Positions The Productivity Committee has reviewed the four applications received by the prescribed deadline for six vacancies effective February 2, 2004. Applicants were evaluated based on their potential contributions to the Committee. The Committee found all four applicants to be highly qualified. The Committee recommends the following applicants for appointment for terms expiring February 2, 2006. NAME TYPE OF TERM DISTRICT FIELD OF EXPERTISE APPOINTMENT Janet Vasey Reappointment* 4 3 Budget, Financial Analysis, Program Analysis Dexter R. Groose Reappointment 2 2 Performance Analysis and Value Analysis Identifying Strategic Requirements and Direction for Joseph B,Swaja Reappointment 2 1 Productivity Programs, Development of Strategic Objectives City Government Services, Residential and Commercial Helen C. Philbin Initial 1 I Zoning Compliance, Budget Preparation, Service Delivery Please advise should you need additional information. * Since Ms. Vasey has served 3 consecutive terms, the Board of County Commissioners, should they wish to re- appoint Ms. Vasey, must waive the limitation on two consecutive terms. A\\3G,NiJ A ITEM Winona Walker Stone Assistant to the County Manager Voice 774 -8383 Fax 774 -4010 Email WinonaStow&eoliier g ov.net County Government Productivity Committee Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term Name Home Phone DateRe -appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term Mr. Albin A. Kozek, Jr. 01/28/03 02/04/05 2 Years 5308 Hawkesbury Way 596 -5020 Naples, FL 34119 E- Yfail: District: 3 Category: Marketing; Strategic Planning & Program Mgmt. Ms. Donna Fiala 774 -8097 01/14/03 01/13/04 1 Year 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Maples, FL 34112 E41ail. District: 1 Category: Vice-Chairman Ms. Celia M. Fellows 594 -2021 10/14/03 02/04/05 1.5 Years 1 131 17th Street, S.W. 304 -2118 Naples, FL 34117 E-Uail: celiaanded @msn.com District: 5 Category: Office Mgmt; Accounting N -1r. Richard Schmidt gS�A 596 -8655 O1i28/03 02/04/05 2 Years 9150 The Lane 596 -8880 Naples, FL 34109 E- .flail: District: 2 Category: Investor; Publisher Mr. James C. Ray, Jr. (.e ►ltl'-" ,J,o3591 -6402 01/28/03 02/04/05 2 Years 14497 Indigo Lakes Circle I Y 352 -1306 Naples, FL 34119 E- flail: District: 3 Category: Public Administration; Banking ij�ednesday. October 15. 2003 ,Page I of 3 /AGENDA !t i a County Government Productivity Committee Work Phone 1Vaine Home Phone Appt'd DateRe -appt Exp. Date 2ndExpDate Term 2nd Term 01/12/99 02104/00 /Year Ms. Janet Vasey 598-4378 01/22/02 02/04/04 2 Years 4398 Longshore Way North Naples, FL 34119 E -Mail: District: 3 Category: Budget & Financial Anaysis Mr. Joseph B. Swaja 394 -4599 460 Battersea Court 394 -4599 Marco Island, FL 34145 E -Mail: District: 1 Category: Development of Strategic Objectives 04/24/02 02/02/04 Mr. Sydney E. Blum 594 -7880 10/14/03 237 Burning Tree Drive 261 -1855 Naples, FL 34105 E -mail: eescool @earthlink.net District: 4 Category: Job costing; Mgmt Styles, Efficiency Training Mr. James R. Gibson, Jr. 5041 Mabry Drive Naples, FL 34112 E -Mail: District: 1 Category: Budget & Financial Mgmt 11/09/99 732 -8830 01/22/02 02/04/05 02/04/00 02/04/04 Dr. James T. Horner 596 -1339 01/22/02 02/04/04 4704 Ossabaw Way Naples, FL 34112 E- //Mail. District: 3 Category: Financial Mgmt; Leadership & StaffDev; Professor Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2 Years 1.5 Years 3 Months 2 Years 1 Year 2 Years Page 2 of 3 AGENDA ITEM NO. —9 � a A N 13 21004 pg. S County Government Productivity Committee Name Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term Home Phone DateRe -appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term Mr. Staney E. Farnham 10/14/03 02/04/04 4 months 919 Tropical Bay Ct. 354 -1240 10/14/03 02/04/06 2 Years Naples, FL 34120 E -Hail: sftums @aol.com District: 5 Category: Strategic Planning; Management /Retired Mr. Dexter R. Groose 659 -0489 01/22/02 02/04/04 2 Years 5202 High Street 659 -0389 Naples, FL 34105 E- Jlail: District: 4 Category: Performance Analysis & alue Analysis This 11 member committee was created on 01/20/91 by Ord. No. 91 -10 (amended by Ord. No. 93-13, 96-10 & 2001 -37). The committee is composed of 11 members, with the vice chair of the BCC serving in a liaison capacity. Committee members are required to possess special expertise and experience related to managing large organizations, and must be balanced in representing the views of the community_ The committee reviews the efficiency of departments of County Government under the jurisdiction of the BCC. The committee may analyze and review existing structure, organization, staffing, management, functions, business practices, and procedures of any or all parts of county government and make recommendations for increased efficiency and cost - effectiveness. They may also assist in the implementation of those recommendations. Terms are 2 years. FL STAT .Staff- Winona Stone, Budget Analyst: 774 -8810 Wednesday. October 15, 2003 Pane 3 of 3 AGAEME- ND . n� i �. MEMORANDUM DATE: December 15, 2003 TO: Elections Office FROM: Sue Filson, Executive Manage; Board of County Commissioned RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are registered voters in Collier County. Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides. x COUNTY GOVERNMENT PRODUC'l t ITY CONLM COMMISSION DISTRICT Janet V asey C,39 4398 Longshore Way North Naples, FL 34119 j Dex Groose 5202 Kensington High Street Naples, FL 34105 Joseph B. Swaja 460 Battersea Court Marco Island, FL 34145 Helen C. Philbin 5784 Deauville Circle, #301 Naples, FL 34112 Thank you for your help. C1� a i A AGENDA IT aq uU MEMORANDUM DATE: December 15, 2003 TO: Winona Stone, Staff Liaison County Government Productivity Committee FROM: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioner RE: County Government Productivity Committee As you know, we currently have 6 vacancies on the above- referenced advisory committee. A press release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows: Janet Vasey 4' )98 Longshore Way North Naples, FL 34119 Dex Groose 5202 Kensington High Street Naples, FL 34105 Joseph B. Swaja 460 Battersea Court Marco Island, FL 34145 Helen C. Philbin 5784 Deauville Circle, #301 Naples, FL 34112 Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointment of the advisory committee within the 41 day time -frame, and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at 774 -8097. Thank you for your attention to this matter. SF Attachments A EN1D g� DEC -10 -2003 22:07 Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiaml Trail Naples, FL 34112 (941) 7744*97 Fa:: (941) 774 -3602 CU, r. Application for Advisory Committees/Boards Name: Janet Vasey Home Phone: 598 -4378 Houle Address: 4398 Longahore Way North, Naples FL 34119 Fax *w. 598 -4326 e-mail address: jvasey*gnlfacceaa.ne! Business: Retired Boark or Committee Applied for: Productivity Committee Are $ou a registered voter in Collier County: Yes Do you currently hold public office? No Do you now serve, or bare you ever served, on a Collier County board or committee? Yes If yes; please lilt the canmitlees/boards: Productivity Committee (1999 to present) Revenue Commisdon (present) Ad-hoc Budget Process Review Committee (199519%) Community Activities held: Currently: Property Owners Associations of North Collier County Board of Directors CollWr County Republican Executive Committee Women's Republican Club Precinct Cleric for Copier County elections Formerly: Greater Naples Civic Association Board of Directors Loogshore Lake Foundation Board of Directors Educhtion: Rice University, BA in economics, gracivatea poi beta kappa, cam iauoe Amerkan University, MA in public financial management Industrial CoBege of the Armed Forces, senior service military school Certified Financial Planner (CFP) P.02 Expo"ce: Department of the Army - 20 year career as a civilian Held a variety of financial management positions performing budget. prenarstloo, resource allocation awd fundns policy. Concluded career as Director of Program Analysis, working for the Assistant Secretary of the Artery for Financial Management. identified major Army goals and objectives, monitored performance in attaining objectives, present quarterly review to senior Army officials. Pfaatrreadl wY d ffi -not 771- am6aaria..shou'd lw f-- d M S— AM-N, 6e<+cr�Nw"ww to she Bowd if Comq 3301 Ea swan,: rroX Ngdv. AL 34112 Ifyow'4s.MawfAx y~ or (Ui)77I -3602 or c..i1 is 771.w! y.. ji. velnur� m �rnr roe �smr y"Ce16rr t'e� AG t 4 A P. ....._.- 'i. Friday, December C5, 2003 1.53 PM December 5, 2003 Board of County Commissioners Collier County 3301 East Tamiarai Trail Naples, FL 34112 FAX 774 -3602 P.01 5202 Kensington High St. Naples, FL 34105 -5651 Tel / fax (941) 659 -0389 Reference: Application for AdNisory Committee Dear Commissioners: I hereby request an opportunity to serve a second term on the Productivity Committee. Enclosed is a new Application Form. I appreciate the opportunity to serve my community. n. -- - - - -a -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I- I" Friday, December 05, 2003 1;53 PM Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamtami Trall Naples, FL 34112 (941) 774 -8097 Fax: (941) ?74-3602 p, 02 Application for Advisory Committees /Boards Name: Q?C r s Home Pbone:�y (051-039? home Add ress• 5.J 7 t1 ;n G� • �� ZiP Code- z" FaxNo. Business Phone: 6 —Q rs 7 e-m� address:�t7Q �'46 .I? Q QQ Business: V tt la e- !t e & ( e C-4, 2;1 C Board or Committee sipplied fox' Category (if applicable): Example- Commission District, Developer, environmentallat, lay person, etc. Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes No Do you currently hold public office? Yes No If so, what is that office? — Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Colder County board or committee? Yes Rio If yes, please list the COXIT tteesrboarAs: /HM e e- Please list your communi acts ties (civic clubs,�ighbo hood asvoctation etc, and ttlons holds �f%r�s er �eCM l/:, r 4i r , (a �Q!?,i'!/� �!' Education: preaso auach any additlanal information yore jael perdAeret This application alwuid beforrvardsd to Srre FY Board of County ComprhsleneM 3381 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, ARL 34112 Ifyou wish, please -C your e-mail to suelikol uecolrremoN.(I Thank you for volunteering taserve the Citizens afCalller Co+rnty- p.G2 On / �G{ f/ )R9 A i A,JJ 1 Mana8cr to the !941)771 -3603 or From the Desk of .Joe Swaja ic ti. � NI z�IE DocuNw -NT CONIP.tNY XEROX v�,w�wee soasor AGEND,� T Zvi NO. P g. 1 �- Board of County Commissioners 3301 East'ramiami Trail Naples. FL 34112 (941) 774-8097 Vax: (941) 774-3602 Application for Advisory Committees/Boards Name: Home Phone: Home Address: q 0 i3AT-rrLP-'fiA �441'-n ff- Zip Code: Fax No.- q Y`Y57 4j Business Phone: Business:- /�FX /fZ " 1-7,,,C tr,,C Board or Committee Applied for: Category (if applicable): Example: Commission District, Developer, environmvnta1i.st,!av person. etc. Are you a registered voter in Collier CountN': 4 .:s No Do you currently hold public office? Yes No If so, what is that office! e-mail address:-5ZZ�4`314-()/ Lc i Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier f-ounty boax -or committee? Yes No If yes, please list the committees/ boards: Please list your community activities (ciN ic neighborhood associations, etc. and positions A'7'7pia b & held: C'�- , IC I-AW Education: 77' W:S-- 4*7TJFX,(if-r7L5- a1j)1,1 A�;�.,, OWA oCc-x--i Experience: L)440-4C'6 Q�Cebe[yP,1114 -I-,,J A-C- 1,467.0C7e-r- Please attach any additional information you feel pertinent. lf!;s application should be forwarded to Sue Filson. Executiv Board of County Commissioners, 3301 East Tamiami Trad. A apies, FL 34112. ffyou wish, please fax your application to e-mail to suelilsonAcolliereov.net. Thank you for volumeerin q to serve the citizens of Collier County. ?6Vanager to e x941) 794-3602 or DEC -02 -2003 09 :51 AM PHILBIN 239 775 9372 P.01 Board of County Commissioners 3301 East'ramiami Trail Naples, FL., 34112 l (941) 774 -8097 Fax: (941) 774 -3602 t - �� 1 Application for Advisory Committees /Boards Home Phone,--.'cg Home Address: � �" V 11 L' &,E � /� 0 zip Code: �fT /l --3t, Fax No.; 7 —,� 7-�7) Business Phone: e-mail. address: �_ �/��L� /�R, �Ci¢'51 Business:�`Tf�� Board or Committee Applied for: irD rev C T/ I%/ Y y 4 Q f-f 1�J/ T%/' Category (if applicable): Example; Commission District. Developer, environmentalist, Lay person, etc. Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes �� No Do you currently hold public offlee? Yes No If so, what is that office? Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on.a Collier County board or committee'' Yes No If yes, please list the committees/boards: M Please list�?''our community tivities (clv c clubs, neighborhood also iatlons, etc. and positions ��S E ucatiou• u� Iv tlX,� 51 7- K Tv V "Fd/5 Dv 6fl ao uLL C i(J (J s 1"�I 6 f�Si'F - /P-C� 1A Experience: �oLitlr /NQ , 1 � Among L Please attach any additional Information you feel peraiaent. This appikation s"Add be forwarded to Sue Fitton, Erscutive f onager `tat '! ^^3I, Board of County Commkrsioners, 3301 East Torwiaml Trad Naples, FL 30112 If you wish, Please fai your oPpllcatiow to( 1) 970 -160 or i email to suefrlso161-o/Nrrcov.to rhank yore for volunteering to serve the citizens of Collier County. ;EC --02 -2003 09:52 ON PHILBIN Helen C. Philbin 5784 Deauville Circle #301 Attachment to Application for Advisory Committee/Boards 239 775 9372 P.02 Dec 1, 2003 Employed by the City of New York for 17 years in the capacity of District Manager for Community Board 1 I in Northeast Queens. Board 11 was a residential community of 130,000 residents. I was responsible to see that all City services (police, parks, fire, sanitation, transportation, etc) were delivered to our community in a timely and efficient manner. I managed a staff of six and reported to a Board of 45 to 50 volunteers appointed by the Borough President and City Councilpersons_ As staff to the Board I was responsible for preparation for all zoning and land use public hearings and committee meetings necessary for their decisions on the matters before them. I followed through on these decisions through testimony and attendance at all Board of Standard and Appeals hearings (variances) and the City Planning Commission (zoning changes). Was required to know the Zoning Ordinance of the City of New York as it applied to residential and commercial zoning requirements_ It was my responsibility to prepare the Capital and Expense Budget needs statement for the District for all city agencies and to lobby for its implementation. I was responsible for the processing of all citizen complaints and requests for service in the District for all city agencies and solution of local problems with local and city officials through the District Service Cabinet. I also oversaw all New York City agency (parks, roadway & bridges, sewer, etc.) construction projects in the District with emphasis on their community and environmental impacts during construction and was involved in all stages of their design. To accomplish these objectives I worked cioseiy with elected oiuciais, uIe cull"nu1Lly Board, and civic and neighborhood associations with the ultimate goal of improving the quality of life in the District in a cost effective and efficient manner. Over the years I was appointed to citywide task forces on matters concerning budget planning and preparation, service delivery, and early computer access for Community Boards. AGf~NDCA: IUM IE ! LVJ f EXECUTIVE SUNINURY APPOIN IMENT OF INtEMBER(S) TO THE CITIZENS ADVISORY 'TASK FORCE OBJECTIVE: To appoint 3 members to serve 2 -year terms, expiring on December 31, 2005, to the Citizens Advisory Task Force. CONSIDERATIONS: The Citizens Advisory Task Force is a 5- member committee that obtains community input and direction on proposed target areas (the geographic area designated for rehabilitation through funding from the Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Program from the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs.) They direct, oversee and approve grant applications, monitor the progress of the grant administration and evaluate the final completion of the grant program. Terms are 2 years. A list of the current membership is included in the backup. The terms for Ellen Christian- Myers, William J. McCarthy, and David M. Corban expired on December 31, 2003. A press release was issued and resumes were received from the following 3 interested citizens: APPLICANT CATEGORY DIST ELECTOR ADV. COMM. Ellen Christian -Myers- Re-a ppt Minority 2 Yes CATF William J. NfXarthy-Re-appt At Large l Yes CATF David M Corban-Re -appt At Large 4 Yes CATF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION FISCAL IMPACT: NONE Ellen Christian -Myers — Re- appointment William J. McCarthy — Re- appointment David M. Corban — Re- appointment GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the recommendation for appointment, appoint 3 members, and direct the County Attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the appointments. Prepared By: SL i, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners Agenda Date: JANUARY 13, 2004 AGENDA ITEM NO. _q C. JAN 13 2004 Pg. �,I r Memorandum 1fA 1 "t. s' To: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Collier County Board of County Commissioners From: Gary L. Young, HUD Grant Analyst Financial Administration & Housing Date: December 30, 2003 Subject: December 18, 2003 CATF Meeting Good morning Ms. Filson. Attached is a copy of the Agenda and Minutes for the CATF December 18th, 2003 meeting. A hard copy will follow this e-mail. Three of the member's terms were to end this year. Those members had re- applied for the CATF. A vote was taken to reccommend each member for another term. Each one excused themselves as they were voted on and the motion carried 4/0 for another term for David Corban, Ellen Christian - Myers, and William McCarthy. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 213 -2937 or by e-mail. Thank you for your assistance. c file AGENDA ITEM No. q c 3 20M Collier County Financial Administration & Housing Community Development Block Grants -F�. �=°-® J r tn.. N U LUr U1 ¢ n, n c�- y U m U cZ ,fJ O U z 7� Q 5. O U n o .� FS U y v j � ¢ v U o C U U U U v C m U U v MM y a y O -0-0 c o oo�.�ozvr w � 3 'zza. z¢w J r tn.. N U LUr U1 ¢ n, n c�- y U m U cZ ,fJ O U z 7� Q 5. O U v 11 `t N 7 AGENDA ITEM n o .� FS U y v j � O y V] Vp U U U U v C m U U v MM y a y O -0-0 c o w � 3 n O n n W - j � v' v 1 0 n N U to v f vCi o C' n Q � w � U v 11 `t N 7 AGENDA ITEM � ' U U U w � 3 v 11 `t N 7 AGENDA ITEM Citizens Advisory Task Force Work Phone Appt'd E_p. Date Term !tame Home Phone DateRe -appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term Ms. Ellen Christian -Myers 12/11/01 12/31/03 7091 Lone Oak Boulevard 596 -2135 Naples, Fs., 34109 District. 2 Category: Real Estate Mr. William J. McCarthy 642 -8382 12/11/01 12/31/03 840 South Collier Boulevard 642 -8382 Marco Island, FL 34145 District: 1 Category: Retired -Food Business Mr. David M. Corban 434 -5800 12/11/01 12/31/03 2832 Arbutus Street 775 -9099 Naples, FL 34112 District: 4 Category: Architect 2 Years / 2 Years ,/ 2 Years ,/ Mr. Russell W. Tuff 353 -0444 05/28/02 12/31/02 7 months 2642 44th Terrace, S.W. 01 /14 /03 12/31/04 2 Years Naples, FL 34116 District: 3 ategory: Business Leader ivir. Fred N. Thomas, Jr. 657 -36+y i % i -;/03 12/31/04 2 Years 1205 O h'd A 657 -8181 rc venue Immokalee, FL 34142 District: 5 Category: Minority- Affordable Housing Wednesday, January 15, 2003 Page I of 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. of <' JAN 13 2004 pg. --q._ Citizens Advisory Task Force JVame Work Phone Appt'd Eap. Date Term Home Phone DateRe -appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term This 5 member committee was created on July 24, 1990, by Ordinance 90-60 to obtain community input and direction on proposed target areas (the geographic area designated for rehabilitation through funding from the Small Cities Community Development Block Grant program from the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs.) They dint, oversee and approve grant applications; monitor the progress of the grant administration and evaluate the final completion of the grant program. Terms are 2 years. FL STAT 290.046 .gaff.• Denny Baker, HUI Director: 403 -2330 1s !d'ednesday, January 15, 200.3 Pas e 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM No. - MEMORANDUM DATE: November 10, 2003 TO: Elections Office FROM: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners J ►� �,�� 2 F,; 12 uUFEr'V 4PUcLFCitO ?IS GOLLIF_2 CO. FL. RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are registered voters in Collier County. Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides. CITIZENS ADVISORY TASK FORCE Ellen Christian -Myers 7091 Lone Oak Boulevard Naples, FL 34109 William J. McCarthy 840 S. Collier Boulevard Marco Island, FL 34145 David Corban 2832 Arbutus Street Naples, FL 34112 Thank you for your help. COMMISSION DISTRICT ;,.f „- :JAGENDA ITEM y N0. q L f. jAN 13 2004 ME%IOR AND UM DATE: November 10, 2003 TO: Denny Baker, HUI Director l FROM: Sue Filson, Executive Manager lJ. Board of County Commissioners RE: Citizens Advisory Task Force As you know, we currently have 3 vacancies on the above- referenced advisory committee. A press release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows: Ellen Christian -Myers 7091 Lone Oak Boulevard Naples, FL 34109 William J. McCarthy 840 S. Collier "oulevard Marco Island..:�L 34145 David Corban 2832 Arbutus Street Naples, FL 34112 Please let me know, in writing, the recommc ndation for appointment of the advisory committee within the 41 day time -frame, and 1 "'m pr: t_,;tre an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Please categorize the applicants in are-v. ,i if oxpertise.' If you have any questions, please call me at 774 -8097. Thank you for your attention to this niattcj. SF Attachments AGENDA ITEM '10. qj c ;..t I 3 2004 Pg. 2 l( Alen Christian -Myers 7091 Lone Oak Boulevard Naples, FL 34109 Fax/Phone: (239 )596 -2135 October 22, 2003 Ms. Sue Filson Board of Collier County Commissioners 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 -3602 Dear Ms. Filson: I have enclosed my application for another term on the Citizens Advisory Task Force Committee. I'm hoping to be considered for a.=)ther term simply because it was such an interesting and enlightening experience. I think I can serve in a more positive manner in the future because of the training I've had in the past two years. Irk my original application I may have mentioned that I inherited rental properties from my father back in 1989, which were located in economically depressed areas. Along with my brother, we rehabilitated these units and rented them out to low income families. This was a real training ground for me with these individuals and their needs. We sold the business when I came to Naples. It was some time before I realized we have families with the same problems & needs in Collier County. I am certainly more cognizant of this fact now, after serving on the Citizens Advisory Task Force. I hope you will allow me the opportunity to continue. Respectfully submitted, Ellen Christian-Myers AGENDA ITEM r g_ Board of County Commissioners -_ 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 3,4112 (9-t 1) 774-SW)7 AWL Fax: (941) 774-3602 Application for Advisory CommitteesBoards Name: f= L�ld /�{f </ J f ��" !" ` y+�� Home Phone: Home Address: �� / �-y� �� (-' £ - �' L. �� Zip Code: "I Fax No. cS B {� Business Phone: (')—e-mail address. , rd Business• fz� i 4 0 V v Board or Committee Applied for: (__ ff T F_ Category (if applicable): Crl. I r'0 i Example: Commission District, Developer, environme y Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes Do you currently hold public office.' Yes If so, what is that office? o, e No No Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on oilier County beard or committee'.' Yes V11 o If yes, please list the committeesiboards: (-fi ) T' -• �L i 5 Please list your cpmmunity a tivit (c1vic clubs, neighborhood assoc' tions, etc. aid positions held: Uj <-7 i � �--'E � - !� ' • %�-7 C3 <'_ +�-A L�� c � �� , fir' �1 ��t %u i 1 r-- � h _J Educat'on: CC) : f � GO f f t C }� '� ` ( i - - r U AJ , ��G_ H�a � Experience: t.(� LTy N=s i Please attach any additional information you feel pertlnenL This application should be forwarded to Sue Filson, 4.Vecutive :Manager to the Board ojCounty Commissioners, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, ,Maples, FL 34112. Ifyou wish, please fax rnur ,pplir#rion Or4t»�e e -mail to suefilsou(acollierjzov.neL Thank you jor volunteering to serve the citizens of Collier County. FROM : JEANNE & BILL MCCARTHY PHONE NO. : 9416420057 Oct. 22 2003 10:11AM P1 239 -642 -8382 October 22, 2003 Bill McCarthy 840 So. Collier Blvd, #1603 Marco Island, FL 34145 Fax: 239 - 642-0457 mkkarthy@aol.com Board of Collier County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that I am interested in continuing to serve on the Citizens Advisory Committee. Thank you for your consideration. Yours truly, l -i j j - . C4-, William William J. McCarthy � D�s� r5 A jN , R Pg. _ 19 FROM : TERNNE & BILL MCCARTHY PHONE NO. : 9416420057 Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (941) 774 -8097 Fax: (941) 774.3602 Oct. 22 2003 10:11AM P2 Application for Advisory Committees/Boards Name: �/1/ t �- f A j�1 MCC A- 2 V H Y Home Phone; 1,39- 614 z.?-- 9 3 92- Home Address: Jo• Lozc rte tz bam , MmzColSLA&DLip Code: 3q i LVY- F3a No. 7-39- J, 3:3�- D 4 5 7 Business Phone: Business: RiL ri tZ Board or Committee Applied for: e-mail address:Mkk RT14VO W -Coq isoaL? T,4 Sk )�©Rc- Category (if applicable): Examplc: CoivwkLOon District, Developer, environmentalist, lay person, etc. Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes NO Do you currently bolts public office? Yes No If so, what is that office? Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier County board or committee? Ycs If yes, plestu list the commitbeesAmards: 7-i=-d-5 Arj> V iS ;o C"-4- sK Fo acE. Please list your community activities (civic clubs, neighborhood associations, etc. and positions Education: T� . 5 ^'11 M':'.cr � °T o 13AZI3 011V -fj+!T2-i'4 Experience: wv RiffS o.✓ l TszJ`jl.C3 Uy-tSo2Y R C C `vQA4 4-19 9 � a ova-- -4- 117,r-qo� Please attach any Thaw appticutlOM p6aJd be jorworArd !n SW Mvnie, e. anage/ Jo the Board of County Commissionem 3301 East romiami Trail: Napte4 FL 34112. Ifyou with, please fax you.- application to (941)774-360,2 or c-Maa to sar�nr nfs v Tl+onk yoK for vo7r�JMUVrJeg to serve the c of ColTssr Cp.�ssJy- FROM JERNNE & BILL MCCRRTHY PHONE NO. : 9416420057 Oct. 22 2003 10:13AN P3 bk 3301 East Tamiami Trail • Naples, Florida 34112 - 4977 ?� ' (239) 774 -8097 • Fax (239) 774 -3602 Donna Fiala District t October 17, 2003 Frank Halas District 2 Tom Henning District .3 Fred W. Coyle Cistrict 4 Jim coletta M21jial 5 Mr. William J. McCarthy 840 South Collier Boulevard Marco Island, FL 34I45 RE: Citizens' Advisory Task Force Dear Mr. McCarthy: Your term on the above - referenced advisory committee expires on December 31, 2003. In accordance with the Advisory Board policy, the enclosed press release has been sent to the appropriate news media. We appreciate the time and effort you have put into the activities of this advisory committee and would like to advise you that you are eligible for reappointment. If you wish to be considered for another term, please submit an >uydated application and a letter indicating your interest in continuing to serve on the committee to this office before the November 7, 2003, deadline. If you have any questions regarding this procedure, please do not hesitate to contact me at 774 -8097. Sincerely, Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners /sf Enclosure cc: Denny Baker, HUI Director AGENDA ITEM ND. cIG i ^n 1 ;10 RC. __NCPK. NC. 2s94�402C3 / 1 Nov 10 03 08:31a Collier Country 239- 774 -8865 p.1 Board of County Commissioaels 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, VL34112 941) 774-8097 � • Fax: (941) 774-3602 Application for Advisory Committees /Boards Name:_ CQZl ,-MX) Home phone: Z& Z -O,46 Z Home Address- A97 Z t�� rte, - � �iJdR.�S Zip Code: F � J J I L, Fax No. ZL,4 Business Phone: e-mail address: arnll $usiness: Board or Committee Applied for: Category (if applicable): Example: Commission District, Developer, euveronenenlatLst, a.y VcrsOn, ctc Are you a registered voter in Collier Count.- s V11 No Do you currently hold public ogee? Yes_ AN If so. what is that offset? Do you now serve, or h2ve you ever served, on a Collier r`uunty board or committee? Yes y N, If yes, pleise fist the rotntnit2co /Iroard_- .Q T Please list yottr community activities (civic clubs, neighborhood associations, etc. and positions held: I/r1,- !i�1M..•si7lL�L rai1�!P'� r/ � -- Education: L' re 7'/�er Experience: UcIr .15w47 d&12 J "tause atrdch any aztc vnal informati&n you jeetrertinent rWv _,pp1icctic Lroard ofCountp Cammii'S1aRerS, 3301 Egli Tamiami Trail, Napics, l•Z 341 e -mail to srre�ler.i. {use »lliyw» n Tlyd,rk yv.for vahu zecrin; to veTve the Post -it' Fax Note 76/71 Date . ,.d Da° ► To -5&15 r %S I� From v CoMept. GG Co. Phone u Phone tt 4,34,62- r �d Fax x 4� Z ax it F . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPOINTMENT OF MENIBER(S) TO THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OBJECTIVE: To appoint 2 members to serve 3 -year tenns, expiring on February 14, 2006, to the Collier County Code Enforcement Board. CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier County Code Enforcement Board has 2 terms expiring on February 14, 2004. This 7 member board, plus 2 alternate members, is composed of, but not limited to, individuals representing the occupations of architect, businessman, engineer, general contractor, subcontractor and Realtor and ere considered, in part, on the basis of experience or interest in the areas of the codes and ordinances to be enforced. Members are required to file a Form 1 Statement of Financial Interest each year with the Supervisor of Elections. Terms are 3 years. A list of the current membership is included in the backup. The terms for Clifford Wesley Flegal, Jr., and Roberta Dusek will expire on February 14, 2004. A press release was issued and resumes were received from the following 2 interested citizens: APPLICANT CATEGORY DIST ELECTOR ADV. COMM. Roberta Dusek-Re-appt. Real Estate 3 Yes Code Enforcement Board I Clifford Flegal. Jr.- Re -avpt. Real Estate I 1 I Yes Code Enforcement Board COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Roberta Dusek — Re- appointment Clifford Flegal, Jr. — Re- appointment NOTE: Section Seven (B) of Ordinance 2001 -55 states "Terms of office for Board members shall be limited to two consecutive terms of service on any one Board..." Under (D) of the same section, it is noted that "By a unanimous vote of the Commission, the limitations set forth in subsection (B) above may be waived ". According to available records, Roberta Dusek has served 2 full terms. Should the Board wish to re- appoint Ms. Dusek, the limitations on two consecutive terms will need to be waived. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the recommendation for appointment, appoint 2 members, and direct the County Attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the appointments. Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners Agenda Date: JANUARY 13, 2004 ,�`%GIENDA ITEM ,'40 7, `T Memorandum _ 3. fir^ 13 20013 To: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners From: Michelle E. Arnold, Code Enforcement Director Date: December 23, 2003 Subject: Candidates for Code Enforcement Board Vacancy The resumes for the applicants listed below were reviewed and these meet the Code Enforcement Board Ordinance No. 92 -80, general classification requirements in the following categories: NAME Robertq(Bobbie) Dusek Clifford Flegal CATEGORY DISTRICT Real Estate Three Real Estate One If you need further assistance, please advise. NIEAlslh Code Enforcement Department Community Development & Environmental Services Divis AGE(VDA (T�� ND. . 11 S 3 !004 Pg. Collier County Code Enforcement Board - North rVame Work Phone .-t ppt'd Ex-p. Date Term Home Phone DateRe -appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term Mr. Albert Doria, Jr. 403 -3940 02/11/03 02/14/06 3 Years 6134 Polly Avenue 774 -5211 10/28/03 02/14/05 2 Years Naples, FL 34112 E -Mail: District: 1 Category: REGULAR - Business- Insurance Mr. Raymond J. Bowie 435 -1007 10/28/03 900 Sixth Avenue, South, 9104 775 -0010 10/28/03 Naples, FL 34119 E -Nail: RealtyCounsel @earthlink.net District: 4 Category: ALTERNATE - Attorney - Real Estate VACANT A; Naples, FL E- :ifail: District: Category: ALTERNATE - Ms. Sheri Barnett 1 160 27th Street, S.W. Naples, FL 34117 E- 3Nail. District. 5 Category: REGU 591 -2149 09/10/02 455 -4296 inancial Planning Mr. Clifford Wesley Flegal, Jr. P.O. Box 2663 Naples, FL 34106 E- !Nail: District: 1 Category: REGULAR/Realtor Wednesday, October 29, 2003 06/03/97 774 -9674 01/23/01 02/14/04 02/14/07 02/14/06 02/14/05 02/14/00 02/14/04 4 months 3 Years 3 Years 8 months 3 Years AGENDA ITEM Page 1 of 3 No, � � Collier County Code Enforcement Board - North Name Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term Home Phone DateRe -appt 2ndF..xpDate 2nd Term Ms. Roberta Dusek 774 -2428 07/28/98 02/14/01 3 Years 963 Fountain Run 261 -1111 01/23/01 02/14/04 3 Years Naples, FL 34119 E -Mail: District. 3 Category: REGULAR - Realtor Mr. Gerald I. Lefebvre 659 -2449 04/28/02 4401 Beechwood Lake Drive 775 -8604 02/11/03 Naples, FL 34112 E -Mail: District. 1 Category: REGULAR - Real Estate /"Zoning Mr. George P. Ponte 02/18/97 565 Augusta Boulevard, Apt. 10 793-1370 02/11/03 - Naples, FL 34113 E -Mail. District. 1 Category: REGULAR - Retired CBS Fri- . ,,floyee Mr. Christopher Ramsey 363 Torrey Pine Naples, FL 34113 E -Mail: gcrjd@aaol.com District. 1 Category: REGULAR - Attorney Wednesday, October 29, 2003 =+ -.a40 10/28/03 )228 02/14/03 02/14/06 02/14/00 02/14/06 02/14/06 I Year 3 Years 3 Years 3 Years 3 Years Page 2 of AGENDA ITEM No. „ Collier County Code Enforcement Board - North Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term Name Home Phone DateRe -appt 2ndE.cpDate 2nd Term This 7 member board was created pursuant to Chapter 162 of the FL Stat. by Ordinance 88 -89 and is composed of, but not limited to, individuals representing the occupations of architect, businessman, engineer, general contractor, subcontractor and Realtor and are considered, in part, on the basis of experience or interest in the areas of the codes and ordinances to be enforced. Members are required to file a Form 1 Statement of Financial Interest each year with the Supervisor of Elections. Terms are 3 years. This is a Quasi Judicial Board. Two alternate members were approved by Ord. 96-78 on 12/3196. FL S7 r 162 Staff. Michelle Arnold, Code Enforcement Director:: 403 -2413 Wednesday, October 29, 2003 Page 3 of 3 AGENDA ITEM N©. �1 0 fig. � MEMORANDUM DATE: December 15, 200' Elections Office FROM: Sue Filson, Executive Manage Board of County Commissioner ` RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are registered voters in Collier County. Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD CONI1MISSION DISTRICT Clifford Wesley Flegal, Jr. L 237 Memory Lane #4 Naples, FL 34112 Roberta (Bobbie) Dusek� 963 Fountain Run Naples, FL 34119 Thank you for your help. 1t ;,UZA ITEM 9° MEMORANDUM DATE: December 15, 2003 TO: Michelle Arnold, Code Enforcement Director FROM: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioner RE: Code Enforcement Board As you know, we currently have vacancies on the above- referenced advisory committee. A press release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows: Clifford Wesley Flegal, Jr. 237 Memory Lane 44 Naples, FL 34112 Roberta (Bobbie) Dusek 963 Fountain Run Naples, FL 34119 Please let me know, in writing within the 41 day time -frame, if the applicants are qualified to serve as members on the board, and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at 774 -8097. Thank you for your attention to this matter. SF Attachments AGENDA ITEM No. q D r =. N 3 F �4 Pg. 2 December 1, 2003 Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34 112 Ladies and Gentlemen: Over the past several years I have enjoyed serving as a member of the Code Enforcement Board. For the past two years I have acted as vice - chairman. I would regard it a privilege to once again serve another ten m the Code Enforcement Board. It is my way of giving back to the community. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Bobbie Dusek AGENDA ITEM N0. G) f) A IN Board of County Commissioners Application for Advisory Committees /Boards .Name: �DbEr�a ` �OYJ� 1 G� JD V !Je � Home Phone: 3 S� ` 1-5 5 rj Home address: Q(03 Fo uYN a 1'r\ R u Y-) Zip Code: -34111 Fax No. ;4 3 y- 01 "1 j Business Phone: y 73 ' D l D e-mail address: Business: R54� 5�G1�� 661 L`5 Board or Committee A plied for: (2 GG e �rr_A f e m jz in Category (if applicable): Example: Commission District. Developer, environmentalist, laq person. etc. Ire you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes Do you currently hold public office? Yes If so, what is that office? y No No ✓ Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier Co °1ty Ord or committee? Yes Yo If yes, please list the committees /boards: C t3a en E nrCe me-ol Please list your community activities (civic clubs, neighborhood associations, etc. and _pgsi held: NdpIC5 WDYnay 15 Gll�h 1�UomE?t�5 l2enub(lc'a u 0- _ - I e.— l�a._�►r`...� AiAQnIP _ 1 o.e„1 p�nt�rYr t'.�►'1n Education: t:_7 -r Please attach any additional information you feel pertinent. This application should be forwarded to Sue Filson, Executive .vlanager to the Board of County Commissioners, 3301 Fast Tamiami Trail, .Naples, FL 34112. If you wish, please fax your application to (941) 774 -3602 or e -mail to sueflsow&eolliereov. iwj Thank you for volunteering to serve the citizens of Collier County. 3301 East "Tamiami Trail - Naples. FL 33112 1911) 774 -8097 Fax: (9.31) 774 -3602 Application for Advisory Committees /Boards .Name: �DbEr�a ` �OYJ� 1 G� JD V !Je � Home Phone: 3 S� ` 1-5 5 rj Home address: Q(03 Fo uYN a 1'r\ R u Y-) Zip Code: -34111 Fax No. ;4 3 y- 01 "1 j Business Phone: y 73 ' D l D e-mail address: Business: R54� 5�G1�� 661 L`5 Board or Committee A plied for: (2 GG e �rr_A f e m jz in Category (if applicable): Example: Commission District. Developer, environmentalist, laq person. etc. Ire you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes Do you currently hold public office? Yes If so, what is that office? y No No ✓ Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier Co °1ty Ord or committee? Yes Yo If yes, please list the committees /boards: C t3a en E nrCe me-ol Please list your community activities (civic clubs, neighborhood associations, etc. and _pgsi held: NdpIC5 WDYnay 15 Gll�h 1�UomE?t�5 l2enub(lc'a u 0- _ - I e.— l�a._�►r`...� AiAQnIP _ 1 o.e„1 p�nt�rYr t'.�►'1n Education: t:_7 -r Please attach any additional information you feel pertinent. This application should be forwarded to Sue Filson, Executive .vlanager to the Board of County Commissioners, 3301 Fast Tamiami Trail, .Naples, FL 34112. If you wish, please fax your application to (941) 774 -3602 or e -mail to sueflsow&eolliereov. iwj Thank you for volunteering to serve the citizens of Collier County. Board of Countv Commissioners Application for :advisory Committees/Boards Name: G�i." 7^_r1 LC. 5 yl C'c- Vic Home Phone: 77Y--,S-i66 Home Address: e- ` mil Zip Code: 3 y /i2. Fax No. -'7 7'1 - L 73 Vic. Business Phone: 7 V - J-;4, 6, _ e-mail address: t1-r L><:e Business: �C- Board or Committee Applied for:-6L-46- Category (if applicable): Example: Commission District, Developer, environmentalist, iaN person, etc. Are you a registered voter in Collier County: 'i es No Do you currently hold public office? Yes No If so, what is that office? Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier County board or committee? Yes / No If yes, please list the committeesiboards: �- 1'-E ��r.� Please list your community activities (civic clubs. neighborhood associations, etc. and positions held: psi �� vas Co s AriK -cC� -, Education: Experience: mac- Please attach any additional information you feel pertinent ; !r s application should be forwarded to Sue Filson, Executive ;Manager to the Board of County Commissioners, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, `,aples. FL 34112. Ifyou wish, please faxyour application to (941) 774 -3602 or e -mail to suefilson;a)colliergov.net Thank you for volunteering to 5 erve the citizens of Collier County. 3301 East ramiami Trail .Naples, FL 34112 0-41) 774 -8097 Fax: (941) 774 -3602 Application for :advisory Committees/Boards Name: G�i." 7^_r1 LC. 5 yl C'c- Vic Home Phone: 77Y--,S-i66 Home Address: e- ` mil Zip Code: 3 y /i2. Fax No. -'7 7'1 - L 73 Vic. Business Phone: 7 V - J-;4, 6, _ e-mail address: t1-r L><:e Business: �C- Board or Committee Applied for:-6L-46- Category (if applicable): Example: Commission District, Developer, environmentalist, iaN person, etc. Are you a registered voter in Collier County: 'i es No Do you currently hold public office? Yes No If so, what is that office? Do you now serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier County board or committee? Yes / No If yes, please list the committeesiboards: �- 1'-E ��r.� Please list your community activities (civic clubs. neighborhood associations, etc. and positions held: psi �� vas Co s AriK -cC� -, Education: Experience: mac- Please attach any additional information you feel pertinent ; !r s application should be forwarded to Sue Filson, Executive ;Manager to the Board of County Commissioners, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, `,aples. FL 34112. Ifyou wish, please faxyour application to (941) 774 -3602 or e -mail to suefilson;a)colliergov.net Thank you for volunteering to 5 erve the citizens of Collier County. December 3, 2003 Board of Collier County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 -4977 Ms. Sue Filson, Executive Manager Subject: Collier County Code Enforcement Board Dear Ms, Filson: In response to your letter concerning the expiration of my term on the Collier County Code Enforcement Board I take this opportunity to submit my qualifications for consideration for an additional term. Throughout my two term membership on the Code Enforcement Board I have been fortunate to serve as Chairman for five years, as elected by my fellow board members. During my tenure, the Board has initiated many items favorable to Collier County. We were instrumental in pursuing the collection of fine monies due the county. We implemented the inclusion of county prosecutorial costs as part of the fine obligations imposed on respondents. We pressed for the county to utilize the foreclosure process when people would not meet their tine obligations to the county, whic] i proceeding very well. We requested the County Attorney seek a change in the Florida Statutes to place the county in a primary position on foreclosures, which was accomplished. Through discussions with various investigators of code enforcement I have been informed that the public has become aware of the etTorts put forth by the Board to seek code compliance, utilizing due diligence in its fairness with the public. Moreover, the public at large seems to want to comply with the county codes rather than come before the Board, which is a good measure of our actions. I have twenty -eight years in Government Contracts and Logistics hold Florida Real Estate Broker and Mortgage Broker Licenses, and a Florida Community Association Manager License. I chair the Architectural Committee and serve on the Rules & Regulations Committee and the Long Range Planning Committee at my condominium association (1169 members). I look forward to your consideration of me for the forthcoming open position on the Collier County Code Enforcement Board. Thank you. Sincerely, Clifford Wesley Flegal Jr. AGENDAS ITE&I ?40.� m Pg. m EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPOINTMENT OF MEMBER(S) TO THE RADIO ROAD BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE OBJECTIVE: To appoint 2 members to serve 4 -year terms, commencing on March 3, 2004 and expiring on March 3, 2008, to the Radio Road Beautification Advisory Committee. CONSIDERATIONS: The Radio Road Beautification Advisory Committee has 2 terms expiring on March 3, 2004. This 5- member committee shall recommend work programs and priorities to the County Administrator or his designee. Members shall be permanent residents within the MSTU. After initial staggered terms, terms will be 4 years. A list of the current membership is included in the backup. The terms for Dale L. Lewis and Crystal Kinzel will expire on March 3, 2004. A press release was issued and resumes were received from the following 2 interested citizens: APPLICANT CATEGORY DIST ELECTOR ADV. COMM. Dale L. Lewis —Re -appt. Resident of MSTU 3 Yes Radio Rd. Beaut. Adv. Comm. Betty R Schudel [ Resident of MSTU 3 Yes None COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: FISCAL IMPACT: NONE Dale L. Lewis — Re- appointment Betty R. Schudel —New Appointment GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the recommendation for appointment, appoint 2 members, and direct the County Attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the appointments. Prepared By: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners Agenda Date: JANUARY 13, 2004 AGENDA ITEM ND. AN i � rim Pg. Collier Count 6H0H� Y Memorandum To: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners From: Bob Petersen, Project Manager Landscape Operations Date: December 23, 2003 Subject: Radio Road Beautification MSTU Advisory Committee The Radio Road Beautification MSTU. at their regularly scheduled meeting on December 16, 2003 at 4:30 p.m. at 2705 S. Horseshoe Drive voted to recommend Dale L. Lewis's membership renewal and Betty R. Schudel as a new member to the Board of County Commissioners. cc: Diane B. Flagg, Di 9c Operations and Alternative Transportation Modes Transportation Services Division Traffic Operations & Alternative Transportation Modes AGENDA ITEM w. -9 �:--® :A� s3—i; s —> { Radio Road Beautification Advisory Committee it F= h;"fle Appf'd ter. Date rr.rtlL' ;1:. %7iL' ., ., ate?ie -appi 2 ulE:.pDate 2nd Ms. Susan Saum 793 -9358 03/23/99 03/03/01 2 Years 5060 Coldstream Lane 263 -4030 04/10/01 03/03/05 4 Years Naples, FL 34104 �- 3tai1: District: 3 C'rstegor)�: Briarwood Mr. Dale L. Lewis 05/02/00 03/03/04 4 Years 168 Oceans Boulevard 4-% -7 369 Naples, FL 34104 !3istriet: 3 C ttegorp: Ms. Crystal K. Kinzel 03/03/98 03/03/00 2 Years Years 498 Henley Drive -;477 05/02/00 03/03/04 4 Naples, FL 34105 E -1 ail: D i striet: 3 C. tegcry: Berkshire Lakes Mr. Wilfred Jaeger 09/01/98 03/03/01 3 Years 139 Artic Way c= -::u2g 04/10/01 03/03/05 4 Years Naples, FL 34104 E- :Hail: District: 3 Categorj,: Foxfire Ms. Helen Carella 06/25/02 03/03/06 4 Years 5090 Coldstream Lane ' -.' '• —86 5 Naples, FL 34104 E- Afail: District: 3 Category: Briarwood AGEND l7W lfondat', \rorember 17. 2003 Paoe 1 of ? ®. Pg Radio Road Beautification Advisory Committee Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term Natne Home Phone DateRe -appt 2ndE_tpDate 2nd Tern: This 5 member committee was created on October 21, 1997, by Ordinance No. 97 -52 to aid and assist the Board of County Commissioners in carrying out the purposes of providing curbing, watering facilities, plantings and maintenance of the median areas as set forth in Ordnance No. 96 -84. The committee shall recommend work programs and priorities to the County Administrator or his designee. Members shall be permanent residents within the MSTU. Terms are 4 years. FI_.ST-1T 125.01 Staff. Bob Petersen, Transportation: 774 -8494 AGENDA . .1londa }�, : \m,enzber 17 2003 Page 2 nj�' MEMORANDUM DATE: December 15, 2003 TO: Elections Office FROM: Sue Filson, Executive Manager r Board of County Commission ` RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me know if those listed below are registered voters in Collier County. Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides. RADIO ROAD BEAUT ADV COMM CQ IIVIISSION DISTRICT Betty R. Schudel L '644 Vancouver Lane Naples, FL 34104 Dale L. Lewis -3 168 Oceans Boulevard Naples, FL 34104 Thank you for your help +sdl�t4 IT�i'd! MEMORANDUM DATE: December 15, 2003 TO: Bob Petersen, Landscape Engineer II Transportation Department FROM: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioner RE: Radio Road Beautification Advisory Committee As you know, we currently have vacancies on the above- referenced advisory committee. A press release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows: Betty R. Schudel 6644 Vancouver Lane Naples, FL 34104 Dale L. Lewis 168 Oceans Boulevard Naples, FL 34104 Please let me know, in writing, the recommendation for appointment of the advisory committee within the 41 day time -frame, and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at 774 -8097. Thank you for your attention to this matter. SF Attachments AGENDA ITEM NO. C f Pg. �� Nov 25 03 08:OGa Collier CounL�j 239 -774 -8865 p.l Board of County Commissioners 3301 Fast Tarniarni Trail Naples, FL 34112 (941) 774 -8097 ti - Fax: (94l)774 -3602 Application for advisory Committees /Boards - - >— � ► r F t. u�kti Horne Phene:.jq- 3Sq --_j z 12 Home Address:�q q 11AK)cD0tf f p, (,r� Zip Code: — 41 O tt-- 's f 4 Fax `o. Business Phone: Business: e-mail address: —jbZG hud(d 17U 2 l M s A • CGf Board or Committee Applied for: '? -D I o 0b - }l Category (if applicable): LAY 2 F—It Cl'J —_ —� EYample: Commission Disu-iM- Developer, enviroamentalist }av person, c. et Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes ✓ / No Do you currently hold public office? Yes No � If so, what is that office'.' Do you Row serve, or have you ever served, on a Collier Countt board or committee? Yes If ves, piease list the commtttP- slboards: o Please list your community activities (civic clubs, neighborhood associations, etc. and positions held: �R�S17��1 r laic vvc 11 . ep— I n.— _ r N — .2oo Education: REA — H1CNirAoJ &74- (.>>J{t) F' STY late M-41-Z Vi Please attach any additional information you feel pert;oent Thai application should be ferwerded to Sue ! <lsan, Ere,,Wive ;Vamgir to,Ite Beard of Coutriy C- -issiBners. 3301 East Tamtarni Trail, 'Maples, FL 34112 if j» w ;sA, please far your appl;t anon to 9JI T76 3602 or e -mail to sn¢fhnnra'tWhE °or 'jet. Thank yoafor volunteerurq to serve the citizens ofCoQler Cannty: AGEN® ITEM No. Pa. 12/03/2003 09:38 2395972673 PROHOME SWFL PAGE 01 Board of County Commissioners 3301 East 'rairliami Trail Maples, FL 34112 (941) 774 -8097 Fax: (941) 774 -3602 2 Application for Advisory Committees /Boards Name: Ti4�,E L �j,, 1� /s Home Phone- ��39) 6�3 -X369 Horne Address: j6 9 6' EgA45 aV_D Zip Code: %.341 /40 Fax No. NSA Business Phone: n2- c?4 air a -mail PW j II-e- X111 Business: Board or Committee Applied for: (Pa -� <44y .,p_ Category (if applicable): Example: Commission District, Developer, envireumentalis4 lay person, etc Are you a registered voter in Collier County: Yes ✓ No Do you currently hold public office? Yes If so, what is that office? No Do you now serve, or have you ever served, o C liter Co�}n�tv �uar or rn m' ee? Yes �Io If yes, please list the committeesiboards:__ - t-0- :P - !IW 1y -t•Qd2 Please list yo pr cQmmuni activities (clVe club neigh orh assoc. Lions, etc. and positions held: OX4,X r-ti -I 'All Cam. A- rA..wt La. Education;�c�"` Please aetach any additional Information you feet perrine -t. Th4 application should be forwarded ro Sus Filson, Executive Manager tome Board of County Con minloners, 3301 East Tawolawl Trail,,vapies, FL 34112. )fyou wish, please fans your application to (941)774 -3602 or *-mail to auefdson(Zca1Uireov, net. Thank you for volunteering to serve the cirirens ofCoUkr County. MEMORANDUM DATE: January 5, 2004 TO: Jim Mudd, County Manager FROM: Tom Henning, Chairman Commissioner, District 3 SUR ECT: Intent to Motion to Obtain Board Reconsideration During our meeting of December 1 b, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners heard item 14A: Approve Budget Amendment Recognizing Award of Federal, Aviation Administration Grants, Eliminating a Previously Approved Project, and Returning Net Adjustment to General Fund. The following is an extract of the meeting minutes: " CHAIRMMN HENNING: Okay. Any (questions for the chairman of the Airport A uthority? (No response.) CH,4IRIIf4N HEX/VLVG: There was a motion by Commissioner Coyle; was that correct? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: To approve, right? CHAIRMAN HENNING: To approve. CO1 ,,WSSIONER FIALA: Second that motion. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Second by Commissioner Fiala. Any discussion on the motion? That's lust removing that one item? Okay.. t 11 in favor — COMMISSIONER FL4LA: Who was the second, CHAIRMAN HENNING: Second, Commissioner Fiala. All In favor of the .notion, signify by saying aye. CHAIRMAN HENNING: .1llotion carries unanimously. " Although the vote reflects a unanimous 5 to 0 vote for approval, it is somewhat unclear as to what was included in the vote. I believe additional discussion is needed to clarify what was meant by my comment in the underlined text above. It was my intention to approve the item as presented, with the exception of the FAA county match funding for the Everglades Airpark. In accordance with Ordinance 81 -54, the Reconsideration Ordinance, I am formally notifying you of my intention to move for the Board to reconsider this item during the regular Board meeting scheduled Tuesday, January 13, 2004. JAN 1- 3 2004 It is my understanding that, upon the adoption of the motion to reconsider, the item will be placed on the February 10, 2004 regular meeting agenda for discussion and action. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. ,'wws C: Board of County Commissioners David Weigel, County Attorney Dwight Brock, Clerk of Courts COL. Tom Henning, Chairman i 'ommissioner, District 3 L JAN 13 2Qu4 Pg EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE BUDGET AMENDMENT RECOGNIZING AWARD OF FEDERAL AVIATION ADMININSTRATION GRANTS, ELIMINATING A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT, AND RETURNING NET ADJUSTMENT TO GENERAL FUND Objective: Board of County Commissioners approval of a budget amendment which recognizes the award of three FAA grants, eliminates a previously approved capital project, and authorizes the return of the net adjustment of the sponsor's match to the General Fund. Consideration: On August 25, 2003 the Collier County Airport Authority accepted three grants from the Federal Aviation Administration. The purposes and the amounts of the grants were as follows: Everglades Airpark Design phase of construction $128,626 of parallel taxiway Immokalee Airport Design phase of construction $150,000 of partial parallel taxiway Marco Airport Design phase of parallel $135,484 taxiway mitigation These grants cover 90% of the project cost. The remaining 10% is to come equally from th - 1 -.rida Department of Transportation and the airport sponsor (the Airport AL. . . The Authority's required match is $7,146 for the Everglades grant; $8,333 for the Immokalee grant; and $7,527 for the Marco grant. A previously approved project, Immokalee Security Plan & System grant (Project number 46002) in the amount of $800,000 has not -eceived grant funding and the likelihood of receiving grant funding is remote. Therefore, the County match associated with this project in the amount of $40,000 is available for the above match requirements and the excess should be returned to the General Fund. The net effect on the General Fund of recognizing the FAA grants and elimi-nating the - previously approved project is as follows: l AGEND"I -M JAN 1 E d 1 ' �� Current Budget Sponsor Everglades Total watch Parallel taxiway: Design Phase Immokalee Partial parallel taxiway: Design Phase Security Plan 8' 0,000 in,n0o Marco Partial parallel taxiway: Mitigation Design Phase Needed Budget Sponsor Total Match 142.918 7,146 166,667 8,334 150,538 7,527 Net decrease in Sponsor's match to be returned to General Fund Difference Sponsor Total Match 142,918 7,146 166,667 8,334 (800,000) (40,000) 150,538 7,527 Fiscal Impact: The budgets for the �ibove projects, which are in the Airport Authority Capital Fund (fund 496), will be impacted as shown in the above schedule. The net effect of the __, mendment reflecting these adjustments is that $16,993 will be returned to thF General Fund from Fund 496. Growth Management Impact: T here is no growth management impact associated with this Executive Sum;i) ;ry. Recommendation: That the Board c t County Commissioners approve a budget amendment which recognizes the - ird of these three FAA grants, eliminates a previously approved capital preje- -1 authorizes the return of the $16,993 net adjustment of the sponsor's match r- ,uirement to the General Fund. Prepared by: _ Date: ob us, Finance ;'.':,Hager � 1 Approved by: '-�- -`s-_� - -- Date: Z `�- Ge Schmidt, E :;: ,_,:ive Director ADEN IT M — 1 D. nnr JAPE 13 2y.W Y 9 03 IL December 16, 2003 COMMISSIONER COYLE: Motion to approve. COMMISSIONER HALAS: I make a motion that -- CHAIRMAN HENNING: Motion by Commissioner Coyle to approve staff s recommendation, second by Commissioner Halas. Any discussion on the motion? Seeing none, all in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Aye. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Aye. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Aye. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN HENNING: Motion carries unanimously. Is there any other business? Item #I 4A BUDGET AMENDMENT RECOGNIZING AWARD OF FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION GRANTS, ELIMINATING A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT, AND RETURNING NET ADJUSTMENT TO THE GENERAL FUND — APPROVED MR. MUDD: Commissioner, this brings us to 14(A), which used to be 10(C). CHAIRMAN HENNING: Oh, there it is. MR. MUDD: And it's to approve a budget amendment recognizing award of Federal Aviation Administration grants, eliminating a previously approved project and returning that adjustment to the general fund. {�acEND Page 279 1 JAN 13 -LV-34 Pg. S December 16, 2003 COMMISSIONER COYLE: Motion to approve. MR. VASEY: Just before -- before I begin, earlier, about an hour and a half ago, a fellow said that he had been here at the pledge of allegiance and he was the longest unpaid person? He was wrong, he didn't even have it close. I'm Dennis Vasey, by the way. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Mr. Vasey, you'll keep your items on track to the discussion on hand, right? MR. VASEY: It will be concise, Mr. Chairman. By the way, I'm leaving right from here to go out to the airport for our ceremony tomorrow. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Has it stopped raining yet? MR. VASEY: Where we're at with this pro -- and I'm really pleased with where we're at, because with Mr. Mudd and the staff, we've been able to recognize a lot of the procedure that wasn't being done before. And where we find ourselves right now is we find ourselves having only recently begun to fill in the blanks the way they needed to be filled in. I don't believe that anyone has ever appeared before you on the agenda asking for a budget amendment. And this budget amendment is -- hopefully it won't happen a lot, but when you have a cycle and a time line that we have, we could, based on our strategic plan, come back at any time, because we can't predict the rate that the DOT or the FAA really approve grants. We apply for them and sometimes, quite frankly, we're surprised when they show up at our doorstep. But Collier County has a very long history of frontloading aviation, as Collier County did with the first airport by signing up with the City of Naples and creating that first airport, and also with our own county. So as I look at what we're doing, we've taken our strategic plan, we've used our grant writer, we've applied for grants, and these are Page 280 AGENDA TEn� No. �� j A N 13 2. U- C 4 December 16, 2003 safety related items. These aren't the kinds of things that would add anything superficial. For the work that we're asking to be done, we're looking at the design of safety features at Marco, Immokalee and Everglades Air Park. In the letter and spirit of the directive that you sent us, we've looked at that as a long -range view, and we take the current ordinance, that long -range view and then the interim agreements that we have, and we're telling you that the safety of these airports will be greatly enhanced, notwithstanding any other activities that take place, and we would ask that you approve this budget amendment. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Okay. Any questions for the chairman of the Airport Authority? (10 response.) CHAIRMAN HENNING: There was a motion by Co=issioner Coyle; was that correct? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: To approve, right? CHAIRMAN HENNING: To approve. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Second that motion. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Second by Commissioner Fiala. Any discussion on the motion? That's just removing that o Ic lll.11ln Okay. All in favor -- COMMISSIONER FIALA: Who was the second? CHAIRMAN HENNING: Second, Commissioner Fiala. All in favor of the motion, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Aye. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Ave. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Aye. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Any opposed? AGENgq)TEnii No. Page 281 JAN 13 2:%4 Pg December 16, 2003 (No response.) CHAIRMAN HENNING: Motion carries unanimously. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Boy, Duke, you waited a long time for that. MR. VASEY: It was -- it was fun, and I really appreciate the opportunity to be here. But more important, everyone from the airport wishes each of you a great 2004. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Thank you. Thank you, that was very nice. Item #15 County Attorney David Weigel, do you have any closing comments? MR. WEIGEL: 'None for the meeting. Best wishes over the holidays. Thank you. CHAIRMAN HENNING: County Manager Jim Mudd? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir, I do. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Okay. MR. MiTDD: First we received a -- the Chairman received a memorandum from the Collier County property appraisal, and this had to do with the reduction and assessment of living quarters for parents and grandparents, fondly known as the granny flats issue. And, you know, we asked them for some fiscal analyses to be done on what would happen, and it basically -- and it basically says in his letter, at this time any fiscal impact resulting from the implementation of this exemption in Collier County is indeterminate. Currently Collier County has approximately 70,000 parcels with homestead exemptions. How many of these parcels would -- could I AGENDA tTFwi - Page 282 JAN 13 2004 Dot 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF ACCESS TO EATONWOOD LANE AND LIVINGSTON ROAD FROM THE HIWASSE PROPERTY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND EATONWOOD LANE, EAST OF KENSINGTON PARK PUD, IN SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST. OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to review the following information relative to access from the Hiwasse property onto Eatonwood Lane within the Kensington Park PUD, and consider the three options provided by staff. CONSIDERATIONS: On November 18, 2003, Mr. Gerald Burns, representing the Kensington Park Home Owners Association, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to revoke the previously approved " HIWASSE" Growth Management Plan amendment, hereafter officially referred to as the Livingston Road /Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict. Subsequently, the Board directed staff to schedule the item for discussion. Below is some history and background related to the establishment of the Livingston Road /Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict in the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), and some information pertaining to Eatonwood Lane. Please see attached copy of the Livingston Road /Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict text and map, and Site /Zoning Map. ♦ In 2001, Collier County filed an eminent domain action in the Circuit Court of Collier County, Case No. 01- 1088 -CA, to acquire a perpet.i -1 road right -of -way, drainage, utility and maintenance easement and a perpetual sl, , , easement in certain parcels, related to the construction of a segment of Livingston Rods, lying south of Pine Ridge Road. ♦ Title to these certain parcels vested in the County upon its making a good faith estimate of value. ♦ The owners of those certain parcels maintained that as a result of the taking, the remainder property could only be used for agricultural uses [under current regulations], thereby causing severance damages. ♦ The owners desired to seek an amendment to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to establish a commercial infill subdistrict for the remainder property allowing certain limited commercial uses. ♦ All parties involved, recognizing the cost and risks involved in the continued litigation, desired to settle all pending claims. ♦ On October 23, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners entered into a Settlement Agreement with the other parties - Hiwasse, Inc.; J. Dudley Goodlette, as Trustee and individually; and, Kensington Park Master Association (collectively, the "property owner") - with respect to Circuit Court Case No. 01- 1088 -CA, Collier County v. Hiwasse, Inc. That Agreement waived the GMP amendment petition submittal deadline, thereby allowing Hiwasse, Inc. to file a late GMP amendment petition for limited commercial uses; waived the amendment fee; required an access connection on Eatonwood Lane, at staff's request; and, provided for possible right -in /right -out connection onto Livingston Road, subject to compliance with the Collier County Access Management Policy. ♦ On January 4, 2002, a GMP amendment petition was filed by Hiwasse, Inc.; it requested an amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map, to establish the Livingston Road /Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict (petition CP- 2001 -6). Z JAN 13 2004 Consistent with the Settlement Agreement, the petition proposed limited commercial uses, access onto Eatonwood Lane, and potential limited access (right -in, right -out only) onto - Livingston Road. Upon review and analysis, staff recommended the amendment be adopted, subject to some minor changes; the Collier County Planning Commission recommended adoption as well. The BCC adopted the amendment on May 14, 2002 and, after a finding of "in compliance" with Florida Statutes by the Florida Department of Community Affairs, and no filing of a challenge to that determination, it subsequently became effective. ♦ The access language from the Livingston Road /Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict reads as follows: "Access to the property within the Subdistrict shall be from Eatonwood Lane and shall be located as far to the west as reasonably possible. Additional access to the property, in the form of a right -in /right -out onto Livingston Road, may be allowed where compliance can be established with Collier County Access Management Standards." ♦ In January, 2003, the Hiwasse PUD rezone petition was submitted in reliance upon the Livingston Road /Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict. That petition is still pending. ♦ Livingston Road is a controlled access facility, meaning the number of ingress /egress points is intended to be limited. The fewer access points allowed, the less disruption to the flow of traffic, potentially the higher the operational level of service, and the more likely the road can accommodate its vehicular capacity and still maintain its adopted level of service standard. Staff recommended the Settlement Agreement, and the subsequent GMP amendment, contain language that would restrict access to Eatonwood Lane, an existing road connection to Livingston Road - it would be a means of access without requiring a new connection to Livingston Road. As to direct access from the Hiwasse site to Livingston Road, if that is to occur, Transportation staff wool, Tike to see the Hiwasse property share an access with the La Costa Apartments (directly to the north and northwest, zoned Related Group PUD) "rear" entrance on Livingston Road. This "rear" entrance would line up with an access on the east side of Livingston Road serving the old Ebert Golf Driving Range (zoned Baldridge PUD), soon to be a commercial center; that access on the east side of Livingston would also provide a "back door" access to the Pine Ridge Road Fire Station. ♦ Eatonwood Lane is a 2 -lane local road in the Kensington Park PUD. It runs west from Livingston Road to Kensington High Street and beyond. There is a gated access point on Eatonwood Lane, just east of Kensington High Street. The easterly 390 feet of Eatonwood Lane, that portion lying east of Kensii igiui 1 'r iiyh Streka, is plaitcu ai 130 1 cCl 111 vuiuii t, including a 15 feet wide landscape buffer easement along the north boundary. That segment of Eatonwood Lane is bounded on the south by the Kensington golf maintenance facility, also within the Kensington Park PUD, and is bounded on the north by the Hiwasse property; it crosses the 235 feet wide FPL Transmission Line easement that runs parallel to Livingston Road. ♦ On the plat (PB 28, PG 5 and 6, Kensington Park Phase Three -B, a replat of Tract "T' and a portion of Tract "D "), approved in 1996, Eatonwood Lane is a portion of Tract "R ". The plat contains a Dedication note that reads as follows: `To Kensington Park Master Association, Incorporated: 3. All of the road right -of -way lying within the lands indicated hereon as Tract "R ", for private roadway purposes with responsibility for maintenance, subject to easements heretofore set forth. Said Tract "R" is a private road right -of -way and Collier County has no maintenance responsibility with respect thereto." JAN 13 2004 Pg. °� As presented in their public petition before the BCC on November18, 2003, the residents of Kensington Park PUD are opposed to the access onto Eatonwood Lane. They contend Eatonwood Lane is a private road to which Hiwasse has no right of access nor does the County have the authority to require Hiwasse to access Eatonwood Lane. They state they do not intend to grant access to Eatonwood Lane from the Hiwasse property. Also, they state the BCC was never informed, during the GMP amendment process to establish the Livingston Road /Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, that Eatonwood Lane was a private road. The factual assumption of the Kensington residents is that the Eatonwood Lane access easement is "exclusive "; that is, that their "rights" to the access are such that they have a legal right to exclude a similar use by others. According to the County Attorney's Office, that's not likely accurate as the dedication via plat is typically non - exclusive which means other easements can exist and others may use the same ingress- egress point (assuming the maintenance costs are fairly shared, etc.). The Kensington residents' objective is to have the Eatonwood Lane access requirement eliminated. In their public petition presentation, they requested the BCC rescind its action to adopt the GMP amendment establishing the Subdistrict and to declare the adopting ordinance null and void. Procedurally, those requested actions couldn't occur; however, subject to proper notice requirements, the BCC could adopt an amendment to the Subdistrict to delete the Eatonwood Lane access requirement as well as make access change(s) pertaining to Livingston Road. BCC Options: Through this Executive. Summary item, the BCC cannot, should it so desire, take any action to change the access requirements for the Hiwasse property. What the BCC can do, however, is express its interest, if any, in seeing the access requirements changed, and provide direction to staff and/or the public petitioner (Kensington Park Master Association). Staff has identified the following three options for the Board's consideration: 1. Take no action. If other parties wish to have the access requirement to Eatonwood Lane eliminated, it would be incumbent upon them to file a GMP amendment petition, along with the associated fee, as part of the regular GMP amendment cycle that commences on the 4`h Friday of April each year. 2. Direct staff to initiate a GMP amendi,� �„ i� u� ate the access requirement to Eatonwood Lane. All associated costs would be borne by taxpayers, as the funds would be derived from the general revenue fund (see f=iscal Impact below). Also, direct staff not to schedule hearings on the pending Hiwasse PUD rezone petition until final action on the GMP amendment (either approved and in effect, or denied). If approved, the PUD would need to be revised to comply with the GMP amendment. 3. Direct a joint effort between staff and other party(s) to initiate a GMP amendment to delete the access requirement to Eatonwood Lane — staff to prepare the amendment, the other party to pay for legal ad costs; presumably, that other party would be the Kensington Park Master Association, the residents of Kensington PUD that initiated this discussion (see Fiscal Impact below). Also, direct staff not to schedule hearings on the pending Hiwasse PUD rezone petition until final action on the GMP amendment (either approved and in effect, or denied). If approved, the PUD would need to be revised to comply with the GMP amendment. AGMA(11 Mj� �-�1_' JAN 13 2004 P 3 Under any scenario to amend the GMP to delete required access to Eatonwood Lane, staff would analyze what type of access connection to Livingston Road should be allowed, the location of that access connection, and whether shared access with another development (La Costa Apartments to the north) is possible and feasible. Under any scenario to amend the GMP to delete required access to Eatonwood Lane, and to possibly modify the allowable access connection to Livingston Road, it would be important to ascertain whether the property owner (Hiwasse, Inc.) has any objection to the proposed amendment, given that the connection to Eatonwood Lane was a requirement of the Settlement Agreement agreed to by all parties. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact to the County depends which option the BCC chooses. Option #1 has no fiscal impact to the County. If, based upon the County n,)t taking any action, the private sector files an amendment petition, then their petition fee would cover all costs associated with the processing, review, advertising, etc. of that petition. Option #2 could, potentially, have a fiscal impact to the County's general revenue fund of as high as $16,700 - the petition fee for a GMP amendment that would not be received - plus legal ad costs, which depend upon the number of petitions to share those costs. Total legal ad costs are in excess of $16,000 for the required four public hearings. However, GMP amendments are processed in a cycle typically containing multiple petitions that would share those advertising costs (about 4 petitions are filed per year, on average, though it is unknown if the recent fee increase will affect the number of petitions received). Accordingly, it is anticipated, though not a certainty, that the legal ad costs to taxpayers would be less than the $16,000 +. Option #3 could, potentially, have • fiscal impact to the County's general revenue fund of as high as $16,700 - the petition fee for • GMP amendment that would not be received. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This item has no Growth Management impact. Depending upon which option the BCC chooses, a GMP amendment petition may be brought to the BCC for consideration in the future. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: There are no environmental issues associated with this item. The Hiwasse property has previously been cleared, and contains no wetlands or listed species habitat. HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: There are no historical /archaeological impacts associated with this item. The Hiwasse property is not identified as being in an area of historical or archaeological probability. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners select one of the above three options outlined by staff. s, , JAN 13 2004 Pg. _. _ r PREPARED BY: _ DATE: t2 9 03 DAVID WEEKS, AICP CHIEF PLANNER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: DATE: -.-2 -2"'y2 ST N LITSINGER, AICP DIRECTOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: 1113/04 BCC hearing DATE: 1 2 J Uri K. SCHMITT tiiINISTRATOR OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION EX SUM Eatonwood Lane - Kensington CP- 2001 -6 G, Comp, Comp Plan Amendments dw/12 -15 -03 s A=IMM Mo. JAN 13 2004 pg. '5— (VI) (VI) 6. Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict This Subdistrict consists of 12.5 acres located on the west side of Livingston Road, south of Pine Ridge Road, and north of Eatonwood Lane. The Subdistrict allows professional and medical offices and indoor self- storage facilities to serve surrounding residential areas within a convenient travel distance to the subject property. The Subdistrict is designed to be compatible with neighboring commercial and residential uses. The maximum allowed development intensities include 91,000 square feet of professional or medical office use in buildings containing a maximum height of 35 feet, or 200,000 square feet of indoor self - storage area in buildings containing a maximum of three stories and at a maximum height of 50 feet. Should a mix of office and indoor self- storage facilities develop on the property, for each two square feet of indoor self- storage area, one square foot of office area shall be reduced from the maximum allowable office area permitted. Access to the property within the Subdistrict shall be from Eatonwood Lane and shall be located as far to the west as reasonably possible. Additional access to the property, in the form of a right -in /right -out onto Livingston Road, may be allowed where compliance can be established with Collier County Access Management Standards. This Subdistrict co sists of 6.0 acres located n the west side of Livingston road nd south of /ial d Lane. The Subdistrict ows professional and medical offi es to serve suresidential areas within convenient travel distance to the ubject property. mercial indoor storag y occupants of the building(s) is Iso a permitted e Subdistrict is desig d to be compatible with neighbori g commercial and resids, through the dev opment standards provide d herein along with other pla siderations. Them imum allowed developm nt intensities include a maximum of 2,500 square feet of pr essional or medical offic use in buildings containing a maxim m of three stories, whi could include two stoPa�Eatonwood over parking, and at a maximum h ght of 50 feet. If a ess cannot be obtained Lane, then access to t e property within the Subdistrict shall be from L ingston Road; shall be located at th southerly end of the site; shall be limited to right -i and right -out only; and, shall include hared access with the property to the south. AGENDA II 48 1 Na /D JAN 13 2004 LIVINGSTON ROAD/ EATONWOOD LANE COMMERCIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA EL I �I z �I i O �O u 4 g ERIOG£R� 'G —LLLLt) of 3 I C 'I 47 LEGEND SCALE I SUBDISTRICT PREPARED BT. GRAPW= AND TECPW -01 AJPPMT SECTION COMMUMTY WALOPEtNT AID EHMIOQWEATAL SEANCES OMSMN I p •.'}pp R. Z`Yb FT. GATE_ S/O2 Flli: f7- 2001- O6.DMC ADOPTED MAY I6, 2002 BY OWKANM NO. 2002 -24 (CP- 2001 -6) AGENDA ntM 49 NO: JAN 13 200' ps -I u 'O N W I� I� a Q U a � w W 0 3 w x z Q ¢ w a � 0 q a O O O � � a z Q o z w E- Q20 _U O E" Q z as O � O J _z a .a z 0 w 0 Q V V7 O Of S �o F y� i�u 0- P P. V asaG <dod �Wn .50 TT p F n �z- tt0< d V p RECE OUNTY ti1MtAa OF ICE DEC 3 12003 ACTION FILE December 30, 2003 Hon. Fred Coyle Commissioner Collier County Government Center 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Re: Kensington Park Master Association / Eatonwood Lane Dear Commissioner Coyle: On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, the Commission will entertain discussion on access to Eatonwood Lane and Livingston Road from the Hiwasse parcel located north of Eatonwood and west of Livingston. The Kensington Park Master Association asks that the County Commission deny access from the Hiwasse parcel onto Eatonwood Lane. A ly • Eatonwood Lane is a private road, maintenance of which is the sole responsibility of Kensington Park Master Association. • On several separate occasions as Kensington Park was developed, the developer dedicated to Kensington Park Master Association: "All of the road right -of -way lying within the lands indicated hereon as Tract "R ", for private roadway purposes with responsibility for maintenance, subject to easements heretofore set forth. Said Tract "R" is a private road right -of -way and Collier County has no maintenance responsibilities with respect thereto." The only "easements set forth" concern ingress on Eatonwood Lane for emergency and other service vehicles, for the purpose of installing utility easements both by the City and County and to Florida Power & Light, United Telephone and any cable television franchise company for the purpose of installing and maintaining their respective facilities. Nowhere can the Master Association find authority for the developer, acting as the Master Association, to create additional burdens on Eatonwood for the benefit of entities not related to the Kensington Park development. JAN 13 2004 pa -q Hon. Fred Coyle December 30, 2003 Page 2 • The purported Grant of Easement by the developer - controlled Master Association to Hiwasse, Inc. was recorded among the Public Records of Collier County 25 minutes before control of the Association was transferred to the residents of Kensington Park. • The residents of Kensington Park asked the developer not to sign or record the Easement several weeks prior to them doing so. • The County, by granting "access" to Nwasse over Eatonwood without consulting the Kensington residents, seems ill advised. • We believe that the County was under the impression Eatonwood Lane was a public road and offered access to the public off Livingston. This was never true. Eatonwood was designed and dedicated as a secondary entrance to Kensington Park for the use of the residents, their guests and invitees. It seems unreasonable for the County to now render the road for all purposes public without compensation to the landowner. The residents of Kensington have asked the Master Association to seek a determination from the County Commission that approving access to Eatonwood Lane from the Hiwasse parcel was done improvidently and based on incorrect information and, therefore, should be rescinded. We suggest that the County Commission direct staff to initiate a GMP amendment to delete the access requirement to Eatonwood Lane, all costs associated with this amendment to be borne by the party who failed to advise the Commission that Eatonwood Lane was a private road and never intended for public use. Thank you for taking the time to review this request. Sincerely, Je Burns, Presid Kensington Park Master Association cc: Hon. Tom Henning, Chairman Hon. Jim Coletta, County Commissioner Hon. Donna Fiala, County Commissioner Hon. Frank Halas, County Commissioner Jim Mudd, County Manager David Weigel, Esq., County Attorney FA GEN tT M F. Joseph McMackin III, Bond, Schoeneck & King, P.A. N 13 2004 181542.1 12/30/2003 RECEIVED COUNTY MANAGER OFFICE 7 C: JAN - 5 2004 ACTION FILE January 3, 2004 Honorable Fred Coyle Commissioner Collier County Government Center 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 RE: Traffic Concerns on Kensington Park Master Association's Eatonwood Lane and Livingston Road Dear Commissioner Coyle: Allo, ig the Hiwasse property owners access onto Kensington Park's private Eatonwood Lane roadway off of 1,1% in,ston Road would create untold major traffic, safety and security issues for our 1,2-'- residents and employees, service personnel and guests. Accordingly, we are askinL, the County Commission to delete the Hiwasse access requirement onto Eatonwood Lane. • The Eatonwood Lane nri� ate entrance off of Livingston Road is our secondary entrance in t,) and out of Kensington Park. It is likely to become our primary entrance once the electronic gate and manned guard house are completeO. • Our peak time trip generation estimates of the Eatonwood Lane daily two - way traffic will exce:::u !.,)00 trips daily during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. in high se_j,oi,,. Coupling this with the Metro Transportation Traffic Impact Anai% , ( a year ago (which stated Hiwasse's trip generation will exr -et, + ' � J)0 two -way trips daily) creates a nightmare of traffic, safety and seciii ,% problems for our residents. • Adding to this potent iai (Iueuing of traffic onto Livingston Road is our Kensington golfco!.rse maintenance traffic from south of Eatonwood Lane which houses ;ii ;-plus pieces of motorized equipment, all of which enter and exit off Fat�,niv ood Lane continually seven days a week. J;�J 13 2004 pg ti Honorable Fred Coyle January 3, 2004 Page 2 • The commercial traffic estimated to intrude upon our private roadway (if Hiwasse were to be allowed access) totally destroys the privacy and well being of our wonderful residential and country club environment. Acting in response to our residents, many of whom will be present on Tuesday, January 13, 2004 when the Commission reviews this matter, we sincerely hope you will support our position that Eatonwood Lane is a private road and should not be intruded upon by any commercial traffic. Sincerely, Ron Hinding Vice Preside t Kensington Park Master Association Cc: Hon. Tom Henning, Chairman Hon. Jim Coletta, Country Commissioner Hon. Donna Fiala, Country Commissioner Hon. Frank Halas Country Commissioner Jim Mudd, County Manager David Weigel, Esq., County Attorney rNo A ND (3E EM � �'J 13 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECEIVE AN UPDATE AND PROVIDE INPUT FOR THE COUNTY ROAD 951 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (PD &E) STUDY, FROM IMMOKALEE ROAD TO ALICO ROAD IN COLLIER AND LEE COUNTIES OBJECTIVE: For the Board to receive a status report and provide input regarding the Project Development and Environment (PD &E) Study for the proposed extension of County Road 951 from its existing intersection at Immokalee Road in Collier County to a point along Alico Road in Lee County. In September 2002, the Lee County Board of County Commissioners (BCC), in association with the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), initiated a Project Development and Environment (PD &E) Study for the proposed extension of County Road 951. The Lee County BCC hired the consulting engineering firm of Dyer, Riddle, Mills and Precourt, Inc. (DRMP) to conduct the three -year long study. Staff from Lee County, Collier County, and FDOT are actively participating in the project management and administration of the study. As a result of the public and agency involvement and consensus building process to date, a series of initial alignment alternatives have been developed and have been evaluated by the project team. The initial screening of potential project alternatives has identified viable alternatives which are recommended for further detailed study. The project team will be presenting this evaluation to the Board on January 13, 2004 and will be seeking their input. Specifically, the project team will be seeking concurrence from the Board relative to the initial screening evaluation and identification of viable project alternatives to be advanced into the more detailed conceptual design and preliminary engineering phase. CONSIDERATION: The PD &E Study process is a formal process established by the FDOT in order to qualify transportation improvements for future federal funding. At the present time, the PD &E Study is the only phase that is funded. Final design, right -of -way acquisition and construction are currently unfunded. The formal PD &E Study is being conducted to identify, evaluate and document potential social, economic and environmental impacts associated with the proposed CR 951 extension and will address federal, state, regional and local regulations for transportation and environmental planning. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 is the primary legislation that mandates the environmental assessment, preliminary engineering and documentation requirements for this type of project. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which is the highest level of environmental documentation required by federal law, is the anticipated Class of Action. Public and agency involvement is a key component of the PD &E Study process. Public workshops and hearings; small group meetings with homeowner associations, civic organizations and special interest groups; as well as briefings to local public officials are typical public and agency involvement activities that are planned for the CR 9 1 PH —M jiNDrTStudy. In addition, an extensive consensus building process has been develo d t JAN 13 2004 Pg. I being integrated into this study. A series of small group meetings and additional public workshops have been held and will continue throughout the study to involve the public and public agencies in the decision - making process for this very important regional improvement. FISCAL IMPACT: No additional funding is being sought from the Board at this time. Collier County contributed $250,000 in FY 2003 towards the CR 951 PD &E Study, while Lee County has assumed the remainder of $2.5 million total project cost. At the apresent time, the PD &E Study is the only project phase that is funded. Final design, right -of -way acquisition and constriction are currently unfunded. GROWTH MANAGEMENT: This project is consistent with the Long Range Transportation Plan and the Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDA "LION: That the Board of County Commissioners supports the project team's initial screening evaluation and identification of viable project alternatives. Prepared by: Jose J. Quinty Principal Planner, Transportation Planning Reviewed and Approved by: AD7 1 /- Donald Sc 4t Director, Transporta. ion Planning Reviewed and Approved by: NormL Feder Transkortation Administrator Date: i? Z za 3 Date: Date: AGFklnA ITEM JAN 13 2094 pg. z EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ALTERNATIVE ROAD IMPACT FEE CALCULATION FOR SHELTON JAGUAR/LAND ROVER DEALERSHIP REPLACEMENT FACILITY OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to approve an alternative road impact fee calculation for a replacement facility to be built at the existing location of the Shelton Jaguar /Land Rover dealership at 850 Tamiami Trail North. The planned new facility will be 26,100 square feet larger than the existing, structure, thus, the impact fees will be assessed only on the additional square footage. CONSIDERATION: The petitioner originally met with County staff to discuss methodology on August 7, 2003 and subsequently paid It `';2,500 review fee as required by Section 74 -204 of Collier County Ordinance No. 2001 -13, as amended, the Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance (the CIFO). Staff has thoroughly reyie%tied the consultant's methodology and verified all calculations. The data collection and analysis meets or exceeds all requirements of the CIFO. The consultant submitted a comprehensive report on November 3, 2003, relevant excerpts of which are attached hereto. The petitioner's consultant, Nunner Group, L.L.C., conducted an alternative road impact fee calculation study collecting trip generutiOm characteristic data from three similar sites in Lee, Broward and Hillsborough Counties. Th;: ;analysis indicates a trip generation rate of 16.4 vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet per day, an a•, ; a Te trip length of 4.8 miles, and 87.4% of those being new trips on the road network. In comet ,.rison, the current rate assessed by the county for an automobile dealership is based on 37.5 trn5 per bay per day, an average trip length of 4.7 miles, and 79% of these being new trips on ! 0ad network. The consultant's trip generation rate resulted from machine counts taken at !')rce sites, and the average trip length and percentage of new trips are the results of originldc,t�n,ition (O/D) surveys of motorists at those locations. The consultant calculated a rate of ` 0.70.ti tier 1,000 square feet, which represents an adjustment of $11,927 from the adopted rate of �, I �.o,5 per 1,000 square feet. For 26,100 square feet, the resulting road impact fee would be � 1 0'> ,30, as opposed to $486,373.50 at the adopted rate. The fee based on the above study cnts a better estimate of this particular automobile dealership's impact on the County's ietwork than does the fee based on the parameters set forth in the current road impact fee . The adopted rate for an automobile dealership is based in part on a trip generation rata chicle trips per 1,000 square feet per day, which is derived from seven site surveys conciuci,:d by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) from the late 1960s to the 1990s. Th(, ��, ,1 ve ys were conducted at various locations around the continental United States. Those se,. en :aches identified daily trip rates ranging from 15.64 to 79.66, of which 37.5 is the average. !,illy trip generation rate of 16.4 falls well within that range. Where more up -to -date, local .:,:t,t is available, such data should be used regardless of whether the final fee assessed would he or less than that reflected in the CIFO. _C, 4 S Alternative Fee Road Impact Fee Calculation for Automobile Dealership — Page 2 The consultant's conclusions are reasonable considering the nature of the market for high -end automobiles. The product line of this establishment is marketed to a relatively small segment of the population. The Shelton Jaguar/Land Rover dealership does not attract the number of vehicle trips that an average dealership would attract, thus, it is reasonable to expect a less- than - average impact on the county's transportation network. Board approval of this alternative road impact fee calculation would not change the current adopted rate for automobile dealerships. The current rate would continue to apply to future developments. FISCAL IMPACT: The road impact fee will be deposited into District No. 3 Road Impact Fee Trust Account (Fund 334) prior to the issuance of a building permit by the City of Naples. If the Board accepts the alternative fee calculation of $175,078.80 (26.1 ksf x $,6,708 = $175,078.80) as indicated in the consultant's report, this would reflect a minus 64.0% adjustment from the adopted rate, a difference of $311,294.70 ($486,373.50 - $175,078.80 = $311,294.70). This adjustment will reduce the availability of funding for capital improvements to the county's transportation facilities system by $311,294.70, however, staff believes the proposed adjustment reflects a more accurate dollar amount to offset the subject automobile dealership's actual impacts on the county's transportation network. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Road impact fees are an important funding source for transportation system capital improvements identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the petitioner's alternative road impact fee calculation for the Shelton Jaguar/ Land Rover Dealership. S• 'd V.� � � � - -3 Alternative Fee Road Impact Fee Calculation for Automobile Dealership — Page 3 r// PREPARED BY: Date: hil i R. Tindall, Principal Planner Transportation Planning Department / � ( REVIEWE Y: Date: `! -4(D Amy N. Patterson, Impact Fee Coordinator Financial Administration and Housing Department REVIEWED BY: tj Date: Donald Scott, AICP, Director Transportation Planning Department APPROVED BY: Date: No an E. Feder, AICP, Transportation Administrator CI C r r i ■ NUNNER GROUP Engineering Services Independent Transportation Impact Fee Calculation Study New / Used Auto Sales City of Naples / Collier County, Florida November 3, 2003 Prepared by: Nunner Group, L.L.C. Je A Nwuie , Date P. umber 45335 8113 Lowbank Dr. Naples, Florida 34109 239.591.1328 A�' ITEM = iDA 3Q.... G JAN 13 K04 --A� i i 1 i s t N NUNNER GROUP Engineering Services Independent Transportation Impact Fee Calculation Study New / Used Auto Sales City of Naples / Collier County, Florida Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Data Collection III. Study Results IV. Alternate Impact Fee Calculation V. Conclusion VI. List of Exhibits AG ;:NDA ITEM No. 10—c'-1— n ? ^0?4 Vie. _ I- I. Introduction Nunner Group has conducted an independent transportation impact fee study for new / used auto sales. New / used auto sales facilities sell and service new and used cars. A replacement facility is to be built at the existing location of Shelton Jaguar / Land Rover Dealership at 850 Tamiami Trail N. This study was completed to determine an alternate transportation impact fee representative of the actual impacts of the proposed use. The study methodology was discussed with county staff and conducted pursuant the county staff August 7, 2003 methodology approval letter. The study followed the procedures / guidelines outlined in the "Alternate Study Guidelines - Collier County Transportation Impact Fee." II. Data Collection Three sites were selected as outlined in use Study Guidelines. The following three sites were selected because of their similarities to the proposed replacement facility. Also listed below are the dates the data was obtained. Locations and Survey Dates Ft. Myers Jaguar / Audi 15875 S. Tamiami Trail Fort Myers, Florida Alpine Jaguar 6606 N. Andrews Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida Jaguar of Tampa 320 E. Fletcher Avenue Tampa, Florida drip Counts: August 17 — 23, 2003 ivey Dates: August 18 — 20, 2003 p Counts: September 17 — 23, 2003 '� . irvey Dates: September 17, 19, 22, 2003 l : Counts: October 7 —13, 2003 rvey Dates: October 8 — 10, 2003 Each of these stores provides new and - f -d auto sales and service. Each location provided controlled access, which enabled accurate daily traffic counts. The sites all fronted major roadways similar to the proposed replacement facility. A site plan depicting each location and h,_iilding size is contained in Exhibit F. Photographs of each location is prov1d; --d in Exhibit G. ?a. A N I `t Average daily trip ends. Traffic counters were in place at each facility for seven consecutive days to determine the average daily trip ends. A copy of this data is contained in Exhibit A. Manual checks as required in the study guidelines confirmed accurate equipment operation. Trip end generation, assessable trip length, and the percentage of new trips added to the road system by the development were determined by motorist interviews. These interviews were conducted over a three -day period for each site from 9am to 6pm. A copy of the completed data collection forms and original forms for each day and site are contained in Exhibit B. The data was analyzed upon completion of the seven days of counting and three days of motorist surveys at each site. The data was analyzed based on the ITE Journal — April 1991 article by William E. Oliver entitled Measuring Travel Characteristics for Transportation Impact Fees. A tabulation of the analyzed data is included in Exhibit B. III. Study Results The data produced the following study results. These calculations are shown in Exhibits C and D. Trip generation rate: 16.4 trip ends per 1000 sf Percent New Trips: 87.4% Average Trip Length: 4.8 miles IIV. Alternate Impact Fee Calculation The data above provides representative values for the variables necessary to compute an alternative transportation impact fee. The above data are indicative of those of the proposed replacement facility. IAll other calculation values are those provided including cost of new road construction, gas tax credit, and interstate mileage credit. The Alternative Transportation Impact Fee is ' calculation is shown in Exhibit E. Based on the data obtained and fixed data provided the impact fee for this facility should be $6,708 per 1000 sf. s'st7 N ITc°s l '33.x'. .r ._..T V. Conclusion The trip generation rate determined by this study is significantly less than the average rate determined by the Institute of Transportation Engineers report Trip Generation, 6`h Edition. A copy of the ITE Land Use 841 is included in Exhibit H. The ITE studies produced a wide margin of rates that make it difficult to access a realistic value on the type of dealership proposed. The ITE rate of 37.5 was based on an average of seven sites surveyed from the late 1960's to the 1990's. These studies produced a range of rates from 15.64 to 79.66. The three surveys completed for this study provide a more representative sample of the proposed facility than the ITE studies. The proposed dealership does not attract the number of trip ends that an average dealership does as surveyed by the ITE based in part by the product line marketed. The product line of this facility is marketed to and attracts fewer customers than a low to mid level product line that is affordable to a much larger market segment. The percentage of new trips generated by this particular use is actually higher than the county estimate and may be attributable based on the reasoning above. The product line attracts a customer that is shopping for a particular product and a dedicated trip is therefore warranted. The higher trip length at the Fort Myers store is due to the fact that several areas served by this store are spread apart i.e. Cape Coral, Sanibel Island and Naples. It should be noted that although there is an existing Naples Jaguar store several customers made the trip from Naples to Ft. Myers for new sales and service because the Naples facility is older and not as inviting as the Fort Myers store. These customers will more than likely u.-,c uic Naples stoic wllcu UIC a%Alicy is completed. This will result in shorter Ft. Myers trip lengths and closer to the Tampa and Ft. Lauderdale result. Based on the alternative impact fee calculation sheet provided in Exhibit E the impact fee for proposed Naples Jaguar facility containing 26,100 sf should be $175,079. Uj ! Trip Generation Rate Table Exhibit C f o !I Ft. Myers 413 35.2 11.7 Ft. Lauderdale 805 38.2 21.1 Tampa 556 33.8 16.4 AVERAGE — 16.4 TRIP ENDS / 1000 SF JAN 13 2004 9•� R Exhibit D Trip Length % New Trips Calculation Sheet Totals Totals Totals Totals Location Item Primary Trip Sec Trip Length Div Trip Length Capture 158 18 Ft. Myers Jaguar Trip Length (miles) Number of observations 584.6 74.4 86.6 23 104 10 34 Average Assessable Trip Length 5.62 miles % New Trips 86.55% Alpine Jaguar Trip Length (miles) Number of observations 668.7 95.3 52.2 29 158 18 18 Average Assessable Trip L th 4.48 miles % New Trips 87.00% Tampa Jaguar Trip Length (miles) Number of observations 592.4 7.2 80.8 23 156 2 24 Average Assessable Trip Length 4.18 miles % New Trips 88.78% Results Assessable Trip Length 4.8 miles % New Trips 87.4% 1 JAN 1 1 '2 1° 5 4 1 1 Exhibit E Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Worksheet Project: Shelton Dealerships New / Used Auto Sales Fixed Criteria Lane Capacity 8685 trips per day I Construction Cost $3,380,891 per lane mile Gas tax credit $4,943 Intersate red. Factor 13% Variable Criteria Trip Generation Rate 16.4 trip ends / 1000 sf Percent New Trips 87.4% Average Trip Length 4.8 miles Compute Trip Ends Per Day per 1000 sf Trip genenration rate x size x percent new trips = Trip ends per day 16.4 1 0.874 14.3336 Trip Ends per day Compute Lane Miles Per Day (Trip ends /Day x Average Trip Length) /(Lane Capacity x 2) = Lane Miles per day 14.3336 4.8 17370 0.003960926 Lane Miles per day Compute Net Impact Fee per 1000 sf (Lane miles per day x Cost per lane mile x interstate reduction factor) - gas tax credit 1 0.003961 3380891 0.87 4943 $6,708 A(--'--ND ,3 }TEM, P g .__�� Land Use: 841 New Car Sales Description New car sales dealerships are typically located along major arterial streets that are characterized by abundant commercial development. Automobile services, parts sales, and substantial used car sales may also be available. Some dealerships also include leasing options and truck sales and servicing. Additional Data The sites were surveyed from the late 1960s to the 1990s at domestic and foreign dealerships throughout the United States, with many conducted in Florida and California. Three sites provided information on the number of service stalls, which included a range of 12 to 49 and an average of 34. Source Numbers 98, 100, 172, 260, 271, 280, 328, 446, 414,424, 427, 438, 440 Trip Generation, 6th Edition A END,nM No. , JAN 13 120154 Pg. 1436 Institute of Transportation Engineers id r� New Car Sales (841) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 7 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 27 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 37.50 15.64 - 79.66 Data Plot and Equation 1,900 18w----- ------ - - - - -- ----------- - - -- 1,700 - - - - -- --- - - -_.:- 1,600 --- - - - - -- -- X---- - - - - -- 1.500 ----------------------------------- 1,400 ----- -- -- ----- ------------ d W 1.300 ------- . . .... . Q 1.200 . .... ............. .... .. _ ........... U 1.100 X m 1.000 ---- ---- ---- - - ---- X: ---- ......-- 900 Q - II 800 --- - - -- --- F .................... ........... ....... . 700 - -- - -------- ....... ......... ; 600 - - --- -• -- . . - ---- ... :- .... -X . .. . X 500 400 ..... 300 X 200 10 � 30 40 X = 11300 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area t A ITEM %< Actual Data Points Q Fitted Curve Equation: Not given R - =• - - JAN 'a -- _1�rY�- Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1442 Institute of Transoortatinn Pnninaarc EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION BY CONDEMNATION, IF NECESSARY, OF PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, DRAINAGE AND /OR UTILITY EASEMENTS, WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADWAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY / AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD GRADE SEPARATED OVERPASS PROJECT (PROJECT NO. 60006). FISCAL IMPACT: $4,500,000.00. OBJECTIVE: To obtain authorization from the Board of County Commissioners to acquire by condemnation, if necessary, all rights and interests in real property which is required for the construction, operation, and maintenance of a grade separated urban interchange at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road and associated improvements to Golden Gate Parkway. CONSIDERATIONS: For a detailed history of the considerations, please see the attached Executive Summary relating to a presentation to the joint City /County workshop on January 5, 2004. Recently, RWA submitted the 60% design plan. This is a milestone level of completion at which point it can be determined the extent of the right -of -way and other interests in real property that will be required to construct the project. Right -of -Way maps and legal descriptions of the right -of -way and easement parcels along the project corridor have also been received. While there has been significant discussion for accommodating the future Overpass with an interim measure such as a split intersection design, the property that is identified for acquisition would accommodate both the interim approach and Overpass. Adoption of the attached Resolution will provide the Board's authorization and directive to staff to secure title work, obtain independent real estate appraisals, make written purchase offers for the real property interests required to construct the project, and to negotiate and close on the purchase of the afore - mentioned right -of -way and easement parcels. FISCAL IMPACT: Total estimated costs for all right -of -way acquisition for this project are \v estimated to be $4,500,000.00. This figure represents all value of land and improvements. Severance damage claims, appraisal fees, title policies, and all expenses associated with condemnation of the necessary right -of -way at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway to Airport Road would increase this acquisition cost. Gas Taxes will fund the costs for all right -of -way acquisitions for this project, whether the acquisition is by gift, purchase, or condemnation. No. _ JAN 13 e`rLA het. � GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The Grade Separated Overpass at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road is identified as Capital Improvement Element No. 73 within the County's Growth Management Plan. The recommendation is consistent with the County's long range planning effort. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: 1. Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the acquisition by condemnation of all rights and interests in real property which are required for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the Grade Separated Overpass at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road; and 2. Authorize the Chairman to execute same on behalf of the Board; and 3. Approve any and all budget amendments that may be necessary to implement the collective will of the Board as evidenced by the adoption of the attached Resolution and the approval of this Executive Summary. ti � ,r SUBMITTED BYOL>� L DATE: Lorraine Lantz ght -of -Way o rdinator Transports n Engineeryig-and Construction Management REVIEWED BY: DATE: evin endri s, Right -of- a pager Trans orta ' n Engineering and Construction Management REVIEWED BY: DATE: !- 2 - -ay Gary P aansuu, P.E., Senior Project Manager Transpoitation Enginee 'ng and Construction Management REVIEWED BY: DATE: Gregg Strakaluse, Director TranspoAtion FMgirqreering and Construction Management APPROVED BY: Nor a Feder, AICP, Administrator Transufortation Services Division DATE: 0 AGFNnn F" No. ni JAN 13 2-004 Pg. RESOLUTION NO. 2004 - _ A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION BY CONDEMNATION OF RIGHT - OF -WAY AS PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, DRAINAGE AND /OR UTILITY EASEMENTS, WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADWAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY / AIRPORT- PULLING ROAD GRADE SEPARATED OVERPASS PROJECT (PROJECT NO. 60027). WHEREAS, the Board of County Commi ;sioners (Board), on May 9, 2000, adopted Ordinance No. 2000 -31 therein establishing the (Ninth Annual Update and Amendment) Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan in order to establish priorities for the design, acquisition and construction of the various capital improvement projects; and WHEREAS, the Board, on November 19, 2003, adopted Ordinance No. "_'002 -60 amending the Growth Management Plan by amending the Capital Improvement Element and the 'Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, the widening of the existing four lane divided roadway to a six lane divided arterial from Bear's Paw to Livingston Road, including an overpass at Airport Road intersection with connecting ramps between Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Pulling Road (Project No. 60027) (hereinafter the "Project") is one of the capital improvement projects required under the Transportation Element of the ounty's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Grade Separated Overpass was identified as a need in the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) Long Range Transportaticn Plan since 1993; and WHEREAS, the Project was also identified in the County's Transportation 5-Year Funded Work Program since 2001; and WHEREAS, due to continually increasing traffic volumes on Golden Gate Parkway and Airport- Pulling Road, it is now necessary and it is in the best interests of the citizens of Collier County to expand the capacity of the interchange at the intersection o.' Golden Gate Parkway and Airport- Pulling Road; and WHEREAS, the location for construction cf the proposed improvements has been fixed by survey and is collectively represented by the legal descriptions comprising Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and ACrF„�! 3t!'�T9 JAN 3! 2 "v bf pg. WHEREAS, after consideration of the availability of alternate routes and locations, the comparative costs of project alternatives, various impacts upon the environment, long range planning options, and public safety considerations, the Board desires to exercise its right to condemn property for public purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that it has been determined by the Board that the construction of the Project is necessary and in the public's best interest in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Collier County. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that construction of the Project is part of the County's long range planning effort, and is included in the Transportation Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan for Growth Management, as approved by the Florida Department of Community Affairs. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Staff has reviewed alternative locations for the project, and the costs associated with the design, property rights acquisition, and construction of the project, as well as public safety and welfare considerations associated with the design and construction of the project, and various impacts to the environment, and the Board finds that after consideration of these issues, the most feasible location for construction of the proposed improvements is collectively represented by the legal descriptions comprising Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that in order to construct the project as designed, it is necessary for the Board to acquire the various real property interests described in Exhibit "A" to wit: fee simple titie interests and/or those perpetual or temporary easement interests. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that all property shall be put to public purposes. AN-D IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the County staff is hereby authorized to immediately acquire by gift, purchase or condemnation in accordance with the provisions of Chapters 73, 74 and 127, Florida Statutes, the above - referenced real property interests more particularly described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and incorporated herein. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that no mobile homes are located on the property sought to be acquired and therefore it will not be necessary to remove any mobile homes from the property to be acquired. Page 2 .jA This Resolution, adopted on this second and majority vote. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: a, �! ('� - iz—[—�--__ — Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attomey day of 2004, after motion, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Page 3 AG Rio... J w`_ �19- Co e-r County TRANSPORTATION DIVISION ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Norman E. Feder, AICP, Administrator, Transportation Services Division FROM: Gregg R. Strakaluse, P.E., Director, TEC &M Department DATE: December 29, 2003 SUBJECT: Condemnation Resolution for Golden Gate Parkway from West of Airport- Pulling Road to West of Livingston Road Collier County Project Number 60027 Part C On January 13, 2004, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the adoption of a Condemnation Resolution for the property interests necessary to six -lane Golden Gate Parkway from west of Airport- Pulling Road to west of Livingston Road/CR 881. This project includes a grade- separated overpass at Airport- Pulling Road. This memorandum contains vital information that the Board of County Commissioners must consider in adopting this Resolution. As you are aware, this roadway has been on the County's long -range plan for many years. It has been the subject of Board meetings, MPO meetings and various other public meetings. This memorandum shall serve to supplement and recap the documentation previously provided to, or presentations made to, the Board. Also, the county attorney's office has advised that you must consider the following criteria when adopting the condemnation resolution: 1. Alternate routes The need for additional east -west arterial capacity within Collier County for travel demands west of Collier Boulevard has been identified and studied at the long range planning level for more than a decade. Due to past and current development patterns, few alternatives exist other than the existing roadway alignments. Pine Ridge Road/CR 896 is currently a six -lane roadway betwee - -- Boulevard. Both Immokalee Road from US 41 to I -75 and V Pagel of 3 from Airport- Pulling Road to Collier Boulevard/CR 951 are currently under design for expansion to six - lanes. Future design plans will complete the improvements of - portions of Radio Road, Davis Boulevard, and Rattlesnake - Hammock Road to four - lane roadways. The Golden Gate Parkway corridor is one of only six east -west corridors in Collier County. The construction of the new I -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, to be completed in 2007, will place additional capacity demands on Golden Gate Parkway. To meet current and future capacity needs, the only viable alternative is to widen Golden Gate Parkway to six lanes and provide a grade separated overpass at Airport- Pulling Road. 2. Safety factors The design of the Golden Gate Parkway improvements has been conducted to meet the standards as defined using the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, the FDOT Plans Preparation Manual, and related design manuals; American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Policy on Design of Urban Highways and Arterial Streets; Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD); and Collier County Policy for Access Management for Arterial and Collector Roadways (Resolution No. 92- 442 as amended in Resolution 2001 -247, dated June 26, 2001), and the Public Rights of Way Construction Standards Handbook (as applicable) to ensure the safe movement of people and goods within the project limits. Long range planning factors The Long Range Transportation Plans (LRTP) for Collier County have evaluated the future travel demand needs using factors such as social impacts, environmental impacts, costs, safety and provision for alternatives. Since at least the 2010 LRTP (adopted in 1992), and reiterated in the following updates for 2020 LRTP (original adopted 1996, updated 1999) and the 2025 LRTP (adopted 2001), the need for six - laning Golden Gate Parkway has been identified. The six - laving is consistent with current and near future travel demand needs and the availability of financial resources. 3. Environmental factors Long -range planning criteria require the consideration of impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. Generally, the impacts of roadway construction utilizing existing corridors have less environmental impacts than new corridors. As such, the section of Golden Gate Parkway from west of Airport- Pulling Road to west of Livingston Road will not affect any wetlands nor are there any endangered or threatened species identified along the corridor. Refined evaluations during the alignment determination phase took more localized environmental issues into account such as choosing the offsite retention/detention system ponds. Water quality treatment will be provided by wet detention ponds on the east side of Airport- Pulling Road discharging into Airport Road Ca Airport- Pulling Road, storm sewer will discharge into the ex sting�\,C)4�tE� Page 2 of 3 1 JAN 13 2`0104 pg. 7 management system for Grey Oaks - Estuary, where water quality will be met without any impacts. The Environmental Resource Permit and the Right of Way Occupancy Permit for this project is currently under review by South Florida Water Management District. 4. Costs Cost to provide for the improvements has been considered from the initial identification in the adopted LRTP. As the project has been refined during the design, more specific costs to implement have been developed and considered as part of developing the financially feasible Capital Improvement Program. The design of the improvements has been made to maximize the improvement benefit with the minimum amount of impacts. The project includes a typical six -lane section with sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides. The corridor is bounded on the north and south sides by commercial lots and residential golf communities. The footprint for the grade separated overpass was established in the Grey Oaks DRI, with the bulk of the right -of -way being set aside in northwest and northeast quadrants of the intersection with Airport- Pulling Road. As the roadway heads east toward Livingston Road, the recommended typical section requires additional right of way from both sides along the corridor. This project will match the proposed typical section used for the Golden Gate Parkway east of Livingston Road. Construction on this project is planned to commence during fiscal year 2004. This project is part of an aggressive acquisition schedule to address the traffic movement and safety needs and problems of the community. Thank you for your time and review of this vital information. NEF: GS /GP:cs C: Ellen Chadwell, Assistant County Attorney Heidi Ashton, Assistant County Attorney Gary R. Putaansuu, P.E., Senior Project Manager, TE &CM Department Page 3 of 3 AG E AR No. JAN 1 2, -34 Pg. PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT- OF -VAY, DRAINAGE FA I I P I T A AND VnUTY EASE ANT _EGAL - )ESCPIPT!UN FUR PARCEL 101 BE!!dG PAR' OF SECTION 26, TOP%JSI ;lr '_OUTF , RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARIICULARL`" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOVF_- COMMENCE AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER 0' ,ND 5 _CTION 26, THENCE S.00'28 42 "N., ALCNG !HE EAST LINE OF -HE SOJI14EASI 1/4 OF SAID SE(:110tl 26. , D,S -ANCE OF 291.79 FEET; 'HENCE LEAVING THE SAID EAST ' NE, N.89 31 18 J:., A DISTANCE OF 68.00 FEET, TO 'HE POINT OF DEC- !NNINC. "HE \CE ALONG 'HE WESTERLY F;I:J+T -OF -WAY OF AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 31), AS RECORDED IN OFF'ICIAI_ RECORDS 800K 2064, PAGE 1161 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THE T`OL- _OWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES; (1) THENCE S.00- 28'42_ "W.. A DISTAN,7 6618 FEET; (2) THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 104'5 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 67.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89'04'23" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH SEARS S 45'DO'54 " -AL, A DISTANCE OF 93.98 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY TIGHT -OF -WAY OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (COUN-' ROAD 886) AS RECORDED IN OFFICAL RECORDS BOOK ZC64, FARE 1157 OF 'HE PUBLIC RECORDS OF (..JLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; !HENCE ALONG -HE SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT - OF-- _° Y THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) DESCRIBED COURSES; (t'; Ti -IENCE 69.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND PARALLE. WITH CENTERLINE OF SAID GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY, 5`1C'3308 °W.. A DISTANCE OF 263.56 FEET. (2) THENCE N.00'25'52 °W.. A DIS :ANCE OF 3 00 'EET; '3) 'HENCE 72.00 FEET NORTIERLY AND PARAL'_E_ 'XIMI CENTERLINE OF SAID GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY, S 9p'5'51)8 ",N A DISIAN"E OF 4C0 OG EEET. fa; THENCE N'.00'26'5:2'W A DISIAN'_' OF 2.00 FEEI; ;51 'HENCE 74 -00 FEET NORTHERL' AND PARALi_E_ WITH CENTERLINE OF SAID GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY, c 89'33'08"19., A DISTANCE OF 1451.53 FEET, TO \ POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY OF SAID COL ?EIJ GATE PARK'NAY, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAI RECORDS BOOK 2790, PAGE 1717 OF THE PUBLIC =ECCRDS DF COLLER COUNT', FI- CR'DA; 7i-ENCE ALONG THE SAID •JOF'HERLY RIGHT- CF-V -nY, OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2790, PAGE 1717, THE FOLLOWING 'IIREE (3) DESCRIBEO COURSES; (1) THENCE N.i6'48'28`V'J -, A OF 55 -53 FEf_T; ;2? I,I1 'ICE 87 -11 FEET NCRTHERL' AIM PARALLE'- WITH CENTERLINE OF SAID GOLDEN GAIE PARKWAY, c 8F S3'OS•'W -, A !'ISTANCE OF 245.78 FEET. (3) THENCE WESTERLY AND NOR'HWE STERL' 1..:'i FFET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE TO 711E RIGHT NORTH HAVINJ 3 A RADIUS OF 38 00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17'44'33" AND BEING SUBTENDED 6Y A CHORD WHICH 3EAP.S N.81'34'3E "W., A DISTANCE OF 11.72 FEET; i1'I.E':CE LEAVING 'HE SAID FIORTHER'_Y RIGHT- OF -AAY, AS RECORDED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2790, PAGE 1717, AND ALOI.G THE SOUTHERLY LIFJL OF LAND AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2361, ,AGES 1404 THROUGH 1411 OF THE P'J3LIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THE FOLLOWING THREE X31 DESCRIBED COURSES: (t) N.83'11'21 "E, A CISTANCE OF 797.97 FEE'; i;2) THENCE N.85'33'03 "E , A DtS:ANCE OF 394 58 FEET: 'HENCE N.88'26.28'E -. 4 DIST ANr;F OF 560.56 FFET; %CE N 01'42'22 'w., A DISTANCE CF 15 -48 FEE_; Tl,E:JCF N.88'17'TS °E. A DISTANCE OF 376'•9 FEET. T!,EI:CE EASTERLY 174.78 FEET A'OD!G THE AR CF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RAD'L'S OF 1650.00 FEEF - HROUGH '. CENTR, "_ t.I,GLE OF 06'04'09- AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD n'11ICH SEARS 1155'15'331_ A DISFA'dCE OF 74 -0 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; %HENCE NORTHEASTERLY 160 13 FEE'' ALOTJG THE ARC OF A TANGEN ^AL CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT - l,:';G A RADIUS OF ' 10 CO FEE' THROUGH A CE NTRAL ANGLE OF 83'24'21' AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A ':H'_ ''D °4F!!CH BE,�RS 11.4031 *18.1.. A .LISTA.IICE CF 146.36 FEET, TO A POINT OF COMPOUND C'UR'VATURE: RJCE 7325 `1;ESTEPLY ATJD PAPAL'_EL WITH 'HE CENTERUNE OF SAID AIRPORT - FULLING ROAD (COUNTY 31). NORTHERLY 39753 FEET :%LONG 111E ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING 0' 5659.33 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'01'29" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD r:HICH BEA. S L!.03'11'37'W., A D:Slt.!4CE OF 397. -5 FEET; EIR-E N O5 "42'02 "E , A CISTANCE OF 103.27 FEE', TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHF -OF -WAY OF SAID : R! =0e'- PULLING ROAD (CO'JIJTY ROAD 31), 15 RE CORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 145, PAGE 95 OF I-E -UBUC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TI -EyCE A-DNG THE SAID '! ✓ESTERI_Y OF .AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD (C(lUNTY ROAD 31) THE EO,I CIA I.G TWO '.2) ( DESCRIBED Co- PSES): '.1) T -1-NCE 50 OD FEET WE5TCRL`.' AI4D PARALLEL `NITH THE CENTERLINE OF SAID AIR PORT- PULL114G ROAD P�t1T" ROAD 31), S. C'5'45'I 5'E., A DISTANCE CF 46.98 FEET; (Z) 'HENCE SOIJ'HERLY 221.39 FEET ALONG THE %RC OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT •'.A• ✓i`!G % RADII'S OF 5679.59 FEET 7HROUCH A C_NJTRAL ANGLE OF 02'1400" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHCPD IN] +ICH BEARS SO4'38'18 °E. A DISTANCE CF 221.37 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGi;T -OF- WAY OF AIRPORT- PULLdJG ROA.0 (COUN Y ROAD 31) AS RECORDED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2064, PAGE 1161; THF!JCF ALONG THE SAID WESTER.! Y RIGHT- OF-WA` OF AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD -(COUNTY ROAD 31) AS PECORDFD IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS 3301( 2064 PAGE 1161, THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) DESCRIBED COURSES; (7) THENCE 5.02 '012 "W, A DISTANCE OF 99.46 _EE; THENCE 5.87'28'42 "W., A C) STANCE OF 9.00 V=ET; '31 -HENCE 68 00 FEET WESIERL" AND PAR.AU -.E!- WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SAID AIRPORT - PULLING ROAD 'COUIJTY ROAD 31), SOUTHERLY 296.44 FEET ALJt -IG THE ARC OF A NON - TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS 5661.58 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'00'00" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CIIOPD WHICH BEARS 5.01'01'18 °E., A DISTANCE G 296.40 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; COtJ!AIh!ING 299,564 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LES_. EXHIBIT r4 CONTAINING 6.88 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SKETCH & DESCRIPTION ONLY Page of NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY FOP. COLLIER COUNTY CC'✓ERNVF?JT 90ARD OF COUNTY „OMMISS:LT;ERS GOLUE,N GATE PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS SKE7'C!l & DESCRIPTION OF: PE•RPEILIAi., NON- E`f:1,1.'SICE ROAD wr✓wl:nNc RIGHT -OP -'NAY, IIRAIN.AGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT � � •Z PARCEL. 10I 1U50 NORTH NOR SECNUE DRIVE, sum 270 NAPLES. FLORIDA IA 10.1 COLLIER couNrY. PLOa11.1A Ih 941)649 -1509 T (94I)649-1056 LB ND.: 6952 9 NI}F I'D E° PEVi,IpN SECTION TOWNSHIP I PAIJGE I SCALE DATE DRAWN DY FILE NAME SHEET 25 49 25 DONE 5 -I1 -03 REF OI- O'?155K 101 2 OF N-1 ND 1n '6. 7';02 44.36 re- ',,I.,n Pruett., R<' \01 -G.^. 5 \ally \Re,,ed Fees 4- 02- 02 \0T- 0C22.G044SKIOrA..d4-q ,C:1 =N r ITEM NO. E]Sl t /'4 _'OR J( FOT!T OF SEC 'E 1 IC^ \!LIENC EM EN7 PC 10 `�� T� 1-I I T3I T �1 rO1Il OE II / 9ECVII NRJC i III / fl PI IOIi5 _47 NRPOPT r LL NG ROAD L" I'1011 "INDRY X SP'OUL -fiUSiEEF' } ? OR 133]/,0;:4 } III L5 lllt6s `711.1 -VISE -TID I + SS. M 0 1 90: 1 3'1DD1/76 OR 23_1/ . O4 I1 - .. «... ..< °P.OVCSEC A[)Oii101dni RIG!i7- tJ� -:•:Ar I i - }I 4 1 A4 PERPETUAL. N ^v^ � \C C I 'E - -- -r 4 1 .. EE ROAD RIGhT Ur 0AY I'RAP ACV - - IaE r lE r,_ AN,D, STIR Ty EAS 1•EN1T °A EL I o S 1 SP . -_8 N 10..:_� 2 5� l i � ' - E t � • - f o ,3 _�P ij 5 s F -a.p E 133 ,7 5P5'4 .lAC 2 ' t � e 1 O P 3 - 5 C T, 1 ,l JE 1J -17 E 11 4 _ 3 3c 6 4 0 SD4 33 IE E dj EXHIBIT_ �x - Page _� of�l� ws n }I NNIM A SEC CE: 25-49 25 SEC'KTN 76 4g -]5 1 I BEARS 14w �MfNiR., CLLR. 'NC. OR 1175,572 j \, 1 •, BLARINGS ARE R,•.S10 C '10"T11 .tT.r. C< :T :j, (N. A. D_) '9" -' ??D � 111 STATE PL+NE I`.. COOF'O1�•r.tE S "S`E- 1 -1) fc IL91— En" LONE. �� SY.ETCIf Pi DESCP.iPTICN ONLY 5 Q 0 l—^—�- NOT A 901j^;GARY SURVEY - - -� RocE6 6. cd,TEa_ =RO'[ss1oNAL SLIItvE'tDR k 1.nrPER c!;ALE- 0 -300 :LDnID +REG¢1111o111 -MATE ND 5102 >'WIRC WE !� . Z F(,'R- C(JI TER f 1 _L ,n :Y GO�'EI ?N']�Cr -Il 90ARD OF LOI. nv'Y Cop,gIC 510, ERS y'u N01 vnllp 'w't9U, 1wE DE:IGINAL SI:NAIURE TISN (NRDGCED SEAL 01 - rLOmO+ ?[G6•E aEp r- RORS51cwY SW+"EYt;R _0 e�nPPER. GOLDEN GA 'TE PARKWAY 1W;PROVEML'N'1'S SKETCH k DESCRIPTION �F: PEP,PM'UAL, NON -EXC LL'SP E ROAD NS`w,.nNc PICAS -OF -WAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EA7EeMEN1' 1<K.�o 1 �- • •1 PARCEL lot 1050NO P711)IORSESIIOEDRIL'E,SVI'EE270 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER CO UNi1', FLORIDA Ph 194])&9 -1509 Fe (911)(49- -056 L 8 No 6952 :CTI!)IJ '0VINSIIIP RA'arr cr.A:.E !JA'E 1)F'AWtd f3Y FILE Nl1,1E S'IFE7 01- OC S 16 t 26 49 'S ?OC 5- 't -')? Fcr CI -OOl ccy +01 1 OF ___ AFf3 JANIi t R E a� [. :t 12"i pg. l0 EXI.IBI'1' .A PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT- OF -VVAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTI01% FOR PARCEL 103A GEINr, pnRT OF SECTION 26, TOWtJSI -VP 49 SOUTH, ',ANIGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARI Y CESCRIBED AS FOLL01','S. CO!. HENCE AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER CF SAID SECTION 26; THENCE 5.00'28'42'RJ_ ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 4 OF SAID SECTION 26, A DISTANCE OF 546.81 FEET; 'tIENCE S 89'33'C8 °W., A DISTANCE OF 310.30 FEET. `0 THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND TO A POINT LYING ON 'HE Soil! IF PLY , ^- ,.GIiT-- F,_,AyT OF .OLDEN GATE ?NR; WAY (COUNTY RCAC 896) AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL FFC:;RP5 POOK 2194, PAGE 583 OF THE PUBLIC R -CORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; HENCE LEAVING THE SAID SOUTHERLY ?iGHT- OF- A'.;Y, S.00- 26'52 "E., A DISTANCE OF 9.00 FEET; THENCE 5 .i`9'33'C8 "W', ;1 DISTANCE OF 311 -37 FEET: 'HENCE N 00'26'52 °'A'., A DIS- ,Ar,]CE OF 13.00 FFFI; TI -lENCE S 89'33'08 "W , A DISIAIJCE C1= 548.20 FEET. TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF i_At.D AS RECORDED N OFF',C'AL RECORDS ROCK 1303, PAGE 1854 OF '. !E PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; - HEIJCE AUJNG THE SAID NEST LINE. N 00'28*39'E A DISTANCE OF ' 1 -00 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY OF GOLDEN GATE FPRICV.4Y (COUNTY ROAD 886), AS RECORDED IV OFFICIAL RECORDS ROCK 1,-0. PAGE 247 OF THE PUBLIC RE -,ORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, 1HEN'CE 50.00 FEET SOUTHERLY AND 14RALLEI- TO -HE CENTERLINE AND ALCt1G -FIE SOUTHERLY RIGHT- OF -2.AY OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (COUNTY ROAD 886), AS RECORDED IN SAID CFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 170, PAGE 247, J 39'33'05 "E, A DISTANCE G 12.06 FEET; THENCE ;LONG THE SO'UT'HERLY RIGHT -CF -WAY OF '3OLDEN GATE PARKWAY ' COUNTY ROAD 886), AS RECORDED 'N OFF "ICIAL RECORDS ROOK 953. PAGE E.31 OF THE PUBLIC RECOP.DS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THE FOLL0,YING 1HPEE (3) CESCRIBED COURSES; (1) THENCE S 87. 27'40 "E A CISTANCE OF 95.96 -EET; (2) THE110E 55 00 FEET SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL 10 SAID CENTERLINE, 1.J ?_,9'33'1)8 , A OiS "ANCE OF 62 00 FEE` (3) THEf"CE N85'47'17 "E., A 11STAN_-E OF 76 -16 "EET, TO THE SOUTHERLY P.I {'HT- CF -i1'AY AS RECORDED IN SAID OLTICIAL = ECORLIS PCOK 120, PAGE 247; THEtICE 5000 -EET S'JUTHFR'_I AND PARALLEL -0 _'-IF SAID CENTERLINE A:,,D ! -LONG 'HE SOUTHERLY AY CF C01 _DEN GATE PARKV,AY (CCUNIY ROAD 886), AS RECORDED IN SAID OFFICIAL RFCORCS ^- N')K1K 120. =ALOE 7.47, 1..89`33'08 "E., A DISTANCE C 308.51 FEET; '-'E "JCE 1L0'JG TEIE SCUT IERLY RiG1iT -OF -WAY, AS RECORDED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECCRDS BOCK 2194, PAGE 711R_F (3) DESCP,PED CCl!PSEC; (1) TI- '�E'�CE S 00'26'521., A DISTANCE OF 4.OD F'=ET; ?1 THE ^,CF. 5�- 00 FEET SCU ?H--P,LY AND RARAL'!_EI_ TO THE SA'D CENTERLINE. 081 , A DISTANCE OF 3QQ0 F- E-. i3) THE S 52'06''. 0"F DISTANCE CF 75.1'9 =EET, TO 'HE PO'N-, OF 9C`_:INNIHC: 'EXHIBIT__ SKETCH c DESCRIPTfON ONLY :-age 2 of NOT A BOl1NGARY SURVEY FCR COLDER COUNTY GOVERNMENT BOARD OF CCUNIY HERS GOLDEN GATE 1'n}21fwAY IMPROVEMENTS SKE'I'CII G DES('P.IPTION 01': PERPP:1'UAL, NON- EXCLUSI'X ROAD orsuui we RIGHT- OP -1yAY, DRAINAGE AND UT11.11'Y EASEMLNT C • T1 PARCEL 103A 3050 NOR T II RORSESTIOE DRIVE, SUITE 270 NAI'I,r S, FLORIDA 741U4 COLLIER COL'N1Y, FLORIDA Ph (941) 649LA Ne F.9(91) 6497056 �,r+wi NUMBER 'EV1SIOtJ SECfI'!rJ ?_ *VJIJSH!r^ I ?ANGE SCA;.E r_m E DRAIN BY FILE NAME SHEET 26 40 25 PONE 5 -11 -03 P.EC OI-- OOt5SS<t 03A 2 OF I—- ,. 1 'u'.110v n roes o wO 2W' -- OC:'2.00445110'4rlwg NO ! 1 EXHIBIT �1 P0INr O j IC O 4d A:Enar EIOENT 1't '� GENERAL NOTE iFAST 1/4 ^OR. '1 1� �, ft3 = BASE�iIVE SEC_ 251 I i I .n I < 1 PI 104 +51 -47 -- �— ROW PEP OR I,IS %y(j - -- - - - -i I`� -- - - -- `UR`iFY AlPRORT— PULLING {ROAD c EC'IGN 25-49 -25 oc +sol ' oo�R01 coy <C�1: oo +Eol Do +cot co +1o1 SECTION 26 -49 -25 Rnv! PER OR ROW PER O.R. 90CK 1037, PAGE '.710_ FF ,-1 _- roil ; a' i � I POINT 01 cl X�I BEGINNING 1 _ ' i I Imo' i PROPOSED ADDITIONAL V) �? _ I RIGHT -CE -WAY- c I i NE TABLE _ ?I PERPETUAL NON— EXCLUSIVE 'I''E E Rln'c NG'H a. J .7 ROAD RIGHT —OF— '.NAY. DRAINAGE L1 _ scr) zs'42,w 1 545 Ri AND UTILITY EASEMENT 693 3' a3:w— r 3;p -3 o PARCEL 103A s I — 1_3 — sip zs'S2 °E , po n. L S£° '� 814 31 1.37 ch -- I — 7 -5 _ c I '_6 y'J� 48 20 j - Y 00 �- s< z� j C8 E I 1C2 C0 v 0 76 16 -fzE� ' •T I :JB�' � 0a_E j 130 ou 0 9 �� z ° a I \ u - \\ C \\ "7 I - I ffll ! h rt 77 L7 EXHIBIT z - - - -- Page� of��, 3 - I ! I l l BEARINGS J3[ RASEO 01: 9011, ueERI— DAIU (N.A.O.) 1989 -1990 c01 !E't'E`IT swE P -11NE CO<:ROINA'E S "S'IEY (GR'L') r0, rLOR'I.A EAS, ZOUE '5 150 7 SKETCH & DESCRIPTION ONLY 300 NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY ' ROGER c a NnRPER RROrtssrICAI sl) SC7..E: f" =150' GISIRAT rLUR10A REGIST RADON CEROrIntE HO 5701 57R 91GNI1G DATE- �, U'3 FOR ' COLI -IER CO',1N (Y COIiF RNI,IENi aOARD OF (;G(JNTY (; 71,:fJ. „$G.Q JE `?$ NO` Vµ10 wrtH0U1 irlE DRIGwµ SICNAfURE & nn'SED EMBOSS SEAL Or A LORIOA RECiSiERCD PRDrE551[,wAl SUR.�ETOR AN0 MAPPER. GOLDEN GA'I•F PAREWAY IMPP.OVEMEN7'S �T SKETCH Ec I)ESCRIPI'1ON OP: PERPETUAL., NON- EX(1,USIrE ROAD RIGIIT- -OF -WAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASENJENT a, t •1 PARCEL 103A 1050 NORIII HORSESHOE DRIVE, SUITE 370 COLLIEI? COL'N'fY, FI,0RIDA NAPLES, FLORIDA 341Od Ph.(41)W9 -1509 Fn.(941)649 -7056 JOB Nl!U.y 11 - 'S10fJ �Jt SEC �I11 Tp'NNjF -1? f?A "JOE SCI E DATE DRAWN f31' LD No. 6951 FIE NAME SHEET 01 -0015 16 25 49 75 5G' 5 -11 -03 REC ()1 -00 1 OF 2 Ems. EA11113I'I' A pERpETUAL, NOWEXCLUSNE ROAD RIGHT-0F -WAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL 1038 BEING PART OF FEC -IUN 26, TONNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. C0kIFAENCE AT TFiE EAST '. j4 CORNER OF SAID SECTICiN 26; THENCE S.00'28'42 "W. A''-ONG TIIE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTH--AST 1j4 OF SAID SECTION 26, A DISTANCE OF 633.27 FEET; THENCE LEAVING IHE SAID EAST L;NF, N.89'31''8 "W., A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET. TO THE POINT OF SEGiNNING AND TO A NOWT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT -CF -WAY OF AIRPORT - FULLING ROAD (C:OUNTY ROAD 31) AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 120, PAGE 247 OF THE PUBLC RECORDS CF COLLIER COUNTY, I- LORIDA; THENCE LEAI ✓JNi; THE SAID WESERLY RIGHT -JF- 4AY. COFITINUE N.8 2'31'18 "W., A DISTANCE OF 1500 FEET; ?HENCE 65 00 FEET 'WESTERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE SAID EAST LINE, N.00'2B'42 °E., A DISTANCE OF 40 00 F EET; T' -HENCE `1.3T'3118 1`L, A DISTANCE 'JF 54 d2 FEE ?, "C A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -',NAY OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (COUNTY ROAD 986), AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOCK 2194, PAGE 583 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUIITY, F'_ORIC'A; THENCE ALCNU THE SAID SOUTHERLY RHG- 4T_OF-AlAY 'HE FOLLOWJJG TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES; (1) THE^10E N 69 "33'C3 "E. A DISTANCE OF 4.05 FEEL (7) THENCE 54.80 -EFT ALONG "HE ARC OF A ',1r,G= NFII +L CIRCULAR CURVE 10 THE RIGHT HKIPI -JG A RADIUS OF 40 -83 FEET THROUGH A CE^TRAL ANC-LE OF W- 55'35" ANO BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WFIICH BEARS S 44'59'05E., A DIS"P.NCE OF 58 -21 'E ,-T. TO TILE SAID WESTERLY RIGHT- OF- VVA)'; 'HFr10E =LCNG THE 1A!D WESTERLY RIGIiT- pF- ; :a,Y. 500'2942 "W, A DISTANCE OF 44.;6 FEET, TO 1'HE =OiNT Cl �_GINNII.Ir CCn1TA!NiN;'. ',625 SCUV,RE FEET, MORE OR LESS JAII� 12; L, 4 pg. 13_ EXHIBIT ,4 SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OkLT Fags � NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY -0f FOR: (:01.UI R CO!INTY GOVERNMt NT FAOA3D ; )F COUNTY COMM15510NERS GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IMPROVEMETS N SKETCH & DESCRIPTION 0 PERPETUAL, NON EXCLIf [CE ROAD [' cuNSUla "1u� RIGHT-OF-WAY, DRAINAGE AND 'UTILITY L•ASFMENT' • v-L PARCEL 103B 105014ORTI 111ORSE5110E DRIIT -SIII fE 2]0 NAPLES, FLORIDA 14104 COLLIEP.' COUN'1Y, FLORIDA Ph.(94)649 -1509 Fex(941)6497056 L0 N 0952 1B NUMBER REVISION SECT ON 7( +MNSHIa RANGf SCALE DATE DRAWN BY FILE NAME SHEET 00151E 1 26 19 25 I '10NE 5 -11 -C3 REC Cl - 0015SKID39 2 OF NO API 10, 7902 - S 44 35 M \._—d n.o)ecls R2 \01- 0015 \dw9 \Perked Fees 4 -02- 02\07- 0022.0044Skr01A.o,g JAII� 12; L, 4 pg. 13_ EXHIBIT A POINT OF r01,4I'lE CEti!Et.T 1 1 GENERAL NOTE j EAST 1/4 COR BASELINE 11 }I I SEC- 26 PC 106 +51 4L) PI 104 +5147 Lt 3 SL -RVLy 'i AIRPORT- PULLING ROAD SECTION 25 -49 -25 UC, 501 00 +901 OC 501 J CO +ZDI 0 W ['ER Da 'a5j95 I o0 "01 00101 SECTION 26 -49'25 .� L7 Bnyp rrR RJR aV;1K 1V3 1, GAGE 1710 L4 L3 �(YNT F " 11 BEGINNING 1 PERPETUAL. NON - EXCLUSIVE - - ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PARCEL 103B a II ,625 sq ft. T c _ - PROPOSED ADDITIONAL - RIGH7 -OF -WAY I, _ E "ABLE Vd __. :� N l� ••� r LINE '-T 9EnRINC LENGiI-i n 1 I r II [C L1 SOC28't 2'W 533.2: d t2 1:89 31' 16'W SC .Co _ l �} _ Nag 11'18, _i 5.GO z �L4 _ _ N00'28.4?.E aC.CO 1 / 0 LS N34'31'18'•A' 54.82 O 13 • I ' — _5 _ 'd39'3YOE E 4_93 '/ S0028'42'w 1 44.'6 Y « '� - < O ri J L_j a z �Qo� V� zO I � I a J (� FCE s EL �.' C9 .,p 9 S III 1� 1 i —� d jo I "YV I � � I T EXHIBIT A y I r Pa 9 e (o of f I ( - � BE ARINGE .19E Mn ED 011 1141N n14ERiDN1 7Ai UM (NA .O.) 'SEA -1990 ADJUSNAENi SiAI[ PL-E r =RU'uA1E S.SIEM (GRID) rpR ElOU10n EAST 2OW ' 'S 150 SKETCH & DESCRIPTION ONLY %�J� 800 11 NOT A NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY" ROGER G. ..nitr_R, PROE[i51DUK 5UR1rcrCR & unRl'ER rLMitDn REGISIRAI N CUll WE 5702 SIGMVC DniE'. !'-g_ 2z _ U 1 "OR: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNAIEN[ BOARD OF COUNTY CDµ MI SS'.C,ERS N01 vALID wlruDUr IIiE OR,G'Ut SIGN iuRE k RAISED EMBOSSED SEN. W A ELORIUA RECISTE RCD ,`pIESSTC SUINEyDR AIID --[A. GOLDEN GA'IE PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS SKE "I'CII l DESCRIPTION OF: PERPETUAL, NON- E�CLUSIJE ROAD pc;�,c RIGITT -OF -WAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EA.SEMENY PARCEL 103T3 7050 NOR'TlI HORSESHOE DRIVE, SU[TC 270 NAN.L5, I LOR IDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA rn (941) (49 1509 r44(941) 640 -7056 JOB Nl!:1BER REVISION SEC -IOIJ 1OWNSH'P RANGE SCA1"E - DATE DR4V;N 6Y LE+ N. 6952 [iLE 'JAI,'E SHEE[ 01 -OL`15 '.6 26 I 49 I 25 I 50• I 5_11 -03 REC O1 -00 SSv103B I OF 2 No pg. 'ail III ! srtT -s T EXIIIBIT A LANE TABLE BEARIIdC LENGTH _ 499'J4'38`E 143.16 T N99'3438E 21941, So0'30 04 "E 9606 L4 S 9' 9'SI "'+f 1243_60 _ _ L5 551'5551 'ry 29416 L6 NUU'2il 42 E 107 35 PERPE;CAL, NON- E %CLIfSNE ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY DRAJ14AGE I� J' AND IR CEL 104 ENT \ GARDE - I i �Il I - /._ - •nJ i1!% v /.,,w •av v ,wr zan. ,rx .s -TP_ _i I L4 CZ t' ___- 'k>SF.R46�e 6'Y_OCH GATE rARNnAY v k 6RET - ,Ilis Vii' .... � - - - - -- CURbE TABLE _ �p I � COR \$ L�IIGiF RADIOS UEL'A CB CC �11I 1 Ct 25 C 58-9 56 0'14'371_ S02'10'05 "E 25.Ot �.�Y I_ 2 45 55 90 =721 2 -06 57" N84'25'41' W 14 6 54 - C3 4.10 EA_D UC 27'34'00 " -_- 57 '42'St W 400 26 1 ° `„4 „7 339.62 4F 257017" 575'10'5' W 55.79 _ vtlL - _ -��''. - `B?9.58I 271'29" NUO "47'02 "W 25905 III LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL 104A BEI'JC P ?Rl OF SECTION 254 TOWNSHIP -L9 SOUTH, RANCE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE FARTIC'ULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS - COMMENCE AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER CF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE N.89'34'38 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SKID SECTION 25, A DISTANCE OF 143.16 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF LAN'- AS RECORDED N OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 873, PAGE 1879 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER CCUNT-, FLORIDA; 7,pEE -!C'E SO;�THER':f .ALONG THE SAID EASTERLY AWE OF LAND, 25.01 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NC ' Ar;'SErJilAL CIRCULAR CURVE THE RIGHT HA4 "VG A RADIUS OF 5879.58 FEET THROUGH A ': ENTF-AL AniGtF nt 00'14'37" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS S.02'10'05 "E, A DISTANCE OF 25 -01 AFT, TO A PO:!;T ON "HE SO'UTHERL' LINE OF 1':0.00 F00? WIDE FPL EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECCRCS BOO!< 1g5, PAGE 845 OF COL'JER COU "dTY, F:ORICA AND BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNRJG; -�� !HENCE � %TLC ^:G THE SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, N.89'34'3E "E, A DISTANCE OF 2190.11 FEET; 11;v',a _FAVitd -THE SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, S.00'301,2 "E- A DISTANCE OF 96.06 FEET, TO A POINT 40.00 FEET NL;?IHEF,LY OF THE NORTHERLY RIGHT- OF -WA' OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (COUNTY ROAD 586) AS RECUTTE') �N OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 465, PAGE 275 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, 'HENCE 40`0 FEET NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL OF T`E SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY, RUN WESTERLY THE P,LLO','v'NG FOUR. (4) DESCRIBED COI-'RS'-S; 7HFI,:CE WESTERLY 146.65 FEET .ALO!•JG THE APC OF A NON- TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT "I 1AVI'•!G A RADIUS CF 390972 FEET 1HROUGH A CE'JTRAL ANGLE OF 02'08'57" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD '1'i -I!CH BEARS ^1.89'2541 "W., A DISTANCE OF 146 -64 FEET; !?) THEIIL:E S.P9'29'51 "W., A D!STANCE I -)F 1243.60 tl ',aE rJCE SCUTHVJESTERLY 404.15 FEET ALON; THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CUR'JF TO THE LEFT !IA0P,,` A RADII -S OF 34000 FEET THROUGH A FNT!?AL ANGLE OF 27'34'00" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A l.'HICH BE ^.RS 5.75'42'51 "W., A D'STANCE 40C.26 FEET, {4) THENCE S 51'55'51 "W., _A DISTANCE OF 294.16 7EET: (5) TI- IEh -L:E SOUTHWESTERLY 157.19 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT IAVI >JG J, RADIUS OF 339.32 FEEL THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26'30'12° AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD V%HICH P_E<,RS S 75 10 57 "W., A DISTANCE 155.79 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SAID EASTERLY LINE OF _AND THENCE ALONG THE SAID -'ASTERLY LINE OF LAND, THE FOLLOWfNG TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES; (1) THENCE N.00 "28'4'2 "E., A DISTANCE OF 107.35 FEET; (2) THENCE NORTHERN 259.08 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT SLAVING /A RADIUS OF 5879.58 FEET 'PROUGH A CENIRAL ANGLE OF 02'31'29" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS N.00'47'02 "W -, A DISTANCE 259 05 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAI+,ING 300,719 SOIJARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT 4 CnNTA1t11VG 5.90 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Page Of 0 RE-111 APE 6ti ED 0 N!xt?fI AGEPIG'•N UA1DH ,H A.Di ,RPt! -,o9O `D!'ENI S -E Pt I+E C:Q•JRUINAIF cr5`(u (GRID) 100 r,OR,pn CA51 2oNE. D Zoo 430 f% Boo SKETCH %< DESCRIPTION ONLY E - " -- ROGER L. GRi1fR, FPO( C5510NnL SURVEYOR i MAPPER SCALE' 400 NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY FL 14410 DATE 1RAl,CW DCRTI;-7 N0. 57(12 swNVlc DATE' / _ 1 T p,7) 1 F? Iy (1 A n D OF COUNTY COMIJ, _ $ FOR: CCLLIF UNiv GPVERNt7,ENT A AR LIVERS NOT vALID -*91 111E ORIGINAL SIGNAIBRE k RNSFO EMBOSSED 5EAL OF A FLOR,OA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL SUI-EYOR AND IAPPER. GOLDEN GATE PARKIYAY IMPROVEMENTS PUN SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF: PERPE'I' UAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD mlvsul3 irH�c:` RIGHT- OF -wAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PARCFIL, I 04 HST) NORTH IIORSES110E DRIVE, SURE 270 NAPLES, FLORIDA 74104 COLLIER CO11N'FY, PLORIUA Ph.(941)649 -1509 C,u (941)649-7056 LB NR.: 61932 ''B Nll'e BER 4ET.$IObI SECTION TOWNSHIP '<kNGE $CA.LE DATE DRAwN BY FILE NAME SHEET `- AG,` �.81gL. � I E_fGA - -Or tg.16 << "5 49 25 1, co S -17 -03 REC 0!- 0015SK104A 1 OF t�' {VI�J\ . 211 --,r "J J.' •,.. I G, 7002 - 12.53:.36. W \LDnd P,CiPOS R2 \01 - 001; \dw0\RPn�Sed Fee_• 4- 02- 02 \01 -OC22. 00445KIO4A. d.4 __� T - 5 D .� _li CB CD '69, ,Z -' SF ° NR4 917 W 7B39n_ / -_- 09-W 808.99 Ii _ 5 9 7 1200 Y x184 OO9:E 9'7.35 vEP.FET', AC. N0! txCl;)Sn•E r ROAD '21GuT -OF WAS RNN'AGE "9.?•'' .7'E 1 775.65 ANU U11LIlY EA-II POINT OF PARCEL 'C4B ^e +7s . _ n c[Hean_ NcTE <�� COMMEIlCEMENT IT - PA,rEw[ �\ ._ -..- . - - -_.� EAST 1/4 CDR. -- •zES *Arl rnR'Er: E.Rg nF ___ -- -_ _ -_ \__ _- . -_ -__ SEC. 25 OF. IA28 /1318 110'mZRLY LINE '7.` SCU-W HALF OF SECT'ON 25 -49 -25 FROP(KED RIG 7 OE wnr -- TPL S�III li a zz ^ea, -.g-C' - C -' 1 �'ALSIATT FARTENERSH;v COLLIER CI 33/59 u^ r� OR 1067/1 I T _- TRT"T D .. _. __. -_ _- �� C4 BECINNII ' OR 25n1/11216 1 v PANTHER GREY OAK$, NC. OR 2501/1215 AL!�1t')flA. 7IGH7- CF -1'iAv �_ 833.1 "38 "w 93L68 _. 2_- 0. `C 5275 3 E °1_LO 8 2 2 _W F ,__ -6_ _ S_ i9'SY_W 803 s -DOD i 506 44 1 !_EGA'_ DFSCRIPIICN FOR PARCEL ' 049 �EINC `A!:_ SECI._N 2` 'Gyn:Sh.l? '�9 SOUTH, MANGE 25 EAST, CO'_LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE AR- ;'"'_)L DFSCMDED A F:`:_L01vS. COVIVVNCE A-, 1HE LAST I/a CCRIVEF 0' SAID SECTION 25; T: -IENCE S- 89'34'38 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE D -I'� 1/- n 41D SFCTIC. ' 25, A CISTANCE CF 931.68 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF `LORICA F l %FR r _�l r GODLIER .i.BSTr;IICrJ AS RCCOP.DED !N CFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1067, PAGE 1973 OF -HE P $UC :D_ CF COLLIER CCLNTY FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE SAID WEST L; ^,E, S.GJ'22'13 E_ A DISTANCE OF 352.25 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: ENCE CON'IIPJUE S CC'22 13'E A D'S -ANCE OF 0.00 FEET. TO A POIIJT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT - DF =0' DE^! LATE PaRK1','A" (COUNTY tt OF -WAY JF T'rE 9.:C RECCIFDS ' � rC ❑ 0 8861 AS ECO'RDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 465, PAGE 275 LL E . CC'C NTY -', Or CA; THENCE ALONG THE SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY, THE FCIJ'..1'JG FI':'F !.`-1 DES',: R'BED Ctnl1'PSES'. `HEI1CF 5- 89'33,36 ^1J, ^. JS�AI:C .F 222 "2 =EET.; !2) THENCE 'JORTHOESTERLY 785.40 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CiRC'ULAR CURVE TO THE GI�,T HA' dG A ADiUC CF 37_ GU•�H ;� CEN!1R4L ANGLE OF 11'56'14" AND BEING SUBTENDED g., i,9 A DIST4N�E OF 783.98 FEET: D;STA',ICE C 334.33 EET; 4' 1I Er `OR II FSTE ! r A 'D ` 1r "i`" 810 47 FEET ALONG 'HE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE TO F CFT HA' ll' A R I IU nF C-9 72 FE-_- PIROLIGH -4 CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'00'00 AND BEING SI_:PTE NDr_2 0' A CHL'..D A CH .,GAGS 184 3C'33 ",Al . A DISTANCE OF 808.99 FEET; 5 p r ` -' ` a ''T. I - CF '308_�'I -EE-, 7C THE EASTERLY LINE OF RIGHT -OF -WAY AS "CP - LTA'- RECD ,7'S P...Cj< 2664, �AG� 1162 OF THE DUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, rLCrD�.. � E - F•EIJCE , _ ".G 'HE S.JD FASTER_y N -00 3iT•D 14 A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET, TO A POINT LYING 40 00 FEET -FRLY Cr S=iL C !IF!F L 'ciGHT -OF -WAY; THENCE 40.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL OF THE SF,'n CR +CRL Rr; -.i .,F p,r,�, �,�,,, ._T:SiERLY L FOLLO'J9 "JG FIVE (5) DESCRIBED COURSES; ',E'.CE I.I E9.2- Sl A I H ^F 8G8.44~ - L _Fr; !., "! {EE --;'_: 81885 IEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE .0 -I ` "GF'T /�rJG A R,LrUS OF _9x9,,2 FEFT 'HROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'00'00" AND BEING SU9TE!, = A 3EAPS 5.84'30'09 °E, A DISTANCE OF 817.35 FEET; 3j THE CE = 78'3 ^'G9 : A D'SI:4IdCF OF 33.7 38 FEEL; (4; T!- !ErJCE SOLI- IHEAS`ER! e 777 07 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT HAbING A RADIUS OF 3729.72 FELT 71�ROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11. 56'14" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A Cl'CRD ':4i•!CH SEARS 5.84'28 17'F , A DISTANCE OF 775.65 FEET; ) TIiEhi -C >: 89 33 36 "E., A DISTANCE OF 222.:7 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CO'' +TAIIJIL'G ' 18.435 SOUAPE FEET, fi3ORE OR '..ESS. AMBIT '�CNTAI'dlrJG 2 -72 ACRES, MORE OR LFSS. atu-D) c 5 '91a-G f -9's n?5c C P n JI. . ,nn H slnl[vr.�rnr Page of..� L-L cocRD HAtE 5 -slue (^RP) rDR ILORW V,q 7oNE 2 J00 SOD 12DD SKETCH & ^E5, RF? "ION ONLY NOT A BOUHDe,BY SCRVEY E7- ROCER �f4E . PRoFESS:ON L SURVEYOR unrPER rLORIDA REGISTR.Al10N CERIIFIUIE N0. 5701 <CA!.E. 1' 600' SIGNRIG DATE. 1'� _ 7_Z _ I FOR.:COLLIER COWJTY CUVER!-JkA rlT BOARD CCLN'.Y 01,.1!,!',$ S I(? N FR$ NOl vµ10 wit-7 THE ORICIwy c1GNATURE R "ED EMBOSSED SEµ or A FL0m DA REGISIEREC FRDr ESSIONAL SURvEvOR AND Iu,PBER, GOLDEN GATE PAPRI'AY 1,MPF.OVEVENTS �� SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF: PT'.F.PF'rlim_ NON- EXCLUSIVE ROAD Rz. SU I.r7NC; R""T -OF -WAY, DRAINAGE AND UT11.7Tt EASE,MrI T v 11. PARCEL 10413 MO NORTH HORSESHOE DRtvr surrE 270 NAPLES, FLORIDA 14104 CULLIBR COUNTY. FL01:IllA Pn.{9,I)649.ISD9 Fna(9.1)F49 -7056 C8 No.: 6952 JOB N'JM CR °EblSip.i '.Er TPp.I *OVn;Gi,v 9p,1J;;E SCAi.E DATE DRAWN BY FILE NAME SHEET Ot- OO.S.t6 25 ea 25 !" =500' 5 -17 -03 REC Dt -01) 5SY101B 1 OF I i- 2C'I:2 - 7;5af M \fP"o Fee. 4- 02- 02 \01- 002200445k IG49- U2.dwg AG,E- f��.: No.� _ fS I kI M IT A F IE LI J.. Cr THE SUDM HALF SECT ON 25 - -49 �`'' �I' I 1 �rl •5 -.`Y VP'ERPETUAL. N0N- EXCLUSIVE tl _W11 r C ROAD RIGHT-OF -WAY, DRAIN _ AGE F 201 1 .6 AND UTILITY EASEMENT RACT J PARCEL 105 FAY i11ER G`ZE! OA11S. INC t30.93� (t. Il *" J� 2501 /1Z �a ^ \ PANTHER GREY OAKS. 1NC. L�- DR2501/1216 :nle� LNE TAH.E _ L LCN9 TT J US 4 _ CO CD FI 111E GEARING LENGTH - _ '89 5 9 t 0( C 8a -3U Oo'E 708.09 I LI r 89 34 3 E 1141.27 C2 1 d' 0.2817'E 604.78 15C0 5E 2 R.9B I� - ,g�TILI! L' " 4 :942817 w 61,3. o E 104_ a% r.. r n �... 3115... " .779.72 la __ < I 2'E l'v r:8 4'3009W _ 93C ps`E 334.38 15 _. .N99 J3',56 'E 294.26__ 15_ _..J 2524 E 40.00 �'99.3p355_W 294.26 "emu = I-a0�05 I'1 �LL r'009 "W [;: J: +AL RIGHT- OF -Wt.Y '�.��.- .ri�.El9 2a�2qOo00 j 1400'3C'U9 "W -EGAL jE5i RIPTION � CR PARCEL 105 BEIIJC. PART CF SECIICN 49 SOUTH, RA'a>E 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNT', FLORIDA -EPNG MORE PAR ''C ULARLI CESCR'KI, AS FOLLOWS- •HE ,4 COR!!ER JF 5"','-0 SECfiO'+ ;5; THENCE N89'34'3B"E. ALCNG THE NORTH LINE O SCUTH I, 2 OF SAID SECTION 25, A DISTANCE _)F 1141.27 FEET; THE ^ICF LAVING 'I,E SAID NORTH LINE, 5.00'25'22 °E, DISTANCE OF 259.98 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT- OF -'dJAY OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (COUNTY ROAD BB6) AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 455, PAGE 275 OF THE P;BLiC RECOR -DS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING THE POINT OF BCGI 'JNING, THE'' -CE ALOr:G THE SAID SOI.THERIY RI'„HI- OF -WnY, TaE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) DESCR'BF_D ::CURSES; (I. TFIfNCE .89'29"E.. A DISTANCE '.0,16.• -_ET; 2) 'I+ENCE - ASIERLY AND SOUTIIEASTErILY 759.53 FF_T ALONG THE ARC OF A 'A.NGENnA'_ C;PC'JLAR CURVE ., PIG FIT 4A'J'I'JG A RADIUS OF 37( 9.,2 FEET IF+ ?UGH A CENTRAL ANGLE ^,F 12'0C'CO" AND BEING UBLNI)EC BY A CHORD '1MICH DEARS S.84'30'C9 -.. DISTANCE OF 788.09 FEET; ENCE 5.133 ^ ^9'E. A DISTAr!CE 33e 38 FELT; cC;JTIA ASTE!2Ll 306 21 FEET s� CMG T'-ir !-?C OF A TANGENTIAL CIFCULAR CURVE -0 THE LEFT !.,vllvG F:' +iIL:S 3869.72 �FtT '�I,Ot,Gl A :�:CT'L,I. .ir••iGLE OF 11'56'74" AND BEING SIJBILNDED BY A C!ICED `NFIb; 1I FEAFS ° 84'2E 17 "E , A nISTANCE C� K1,7B FEET; 8933 �F"�., A FVST,, ^NCE 294.28 T11EI „CE LE4'..! ".G TIT SAD D- 1v.vY. ;.60'26'24 "E., A DISTANCE OF IC.,() FEFT, '.FI:C[ 50 "O FFFT A; "D P;, -A Ft- T'J ' _ THE SAID SOUTHERLY RI••;I- 'I- OF -WA:Y, RUN ATSTERLY THE FOU_C''NI)!C: FIVE 151 DESCRIBED CC_!R`:�`. (1) TIIEFiCE SSQ'33'J5 "01'., A DISTANCE OF LP4.25 -Ell 312.57 EE' AI "OI':G -.II %PC A G_jTI,%L CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 3908.72 FELT `HROUGH A CE'.IF.AJ_ ANGLE OF -''a AND BE�NG SUBTEWED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS 'J 84 �9'' 7 °','J . n DISTANCE ^F '13 0 FEET (zl - I;F "CE N_.'8'30'C9''A', A D1STrr,!CE _x,1.38 (a) T14FIICE 'IORTI,NESTERLY AND +ESTERI_Y -81.15 FE? SLONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE T3 THE LEFT r:A.V[t,!O A RADIUS OF 3729.72 FEET THPOJGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'00'00" AND BEING SJBTENDED BY A CH ^PD WHICH PEARS bl_34'3D'09`vv , A DISTANCE OF 779 72 FEET; (5) -14ENCE 5.89'29'51 N, A DISTANCE OF '046.47 E =T, TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT- OF- 'Y!AY, AS RECORDED IN OFFIGAI_ RECORDS BOOK 2064, PAGE 1164 OF T-.E "L;BLIC .RECORDS OF COLLIER, COUNTY, FLORIDA; THEr'I('E AiDONG -'HE SAID EASTEP.I.Y RIGi ,[-- :1F- WA7,',!.'0'30'09 "W., A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET, f0 THE POINT OF BEGItT ITT P!G: CCNTA.NING 130,834 SQUARE FEET, !MORE JR LESS /� CONTAINING 3 00 ACRES. IAOFE OR LESS. EXHIBIT A- Page o 9EAFINI]j nRC goC 0 JN NpF0. nr.c TSnN DnTC� (NAO) '901 -`P90 7.NL'StN�r1T s' %TC c 20 FDU:niE SYSTEN f-,l) 1111.1 rIORIN. Er'S1 ` '`00 5)U 1200 yr G• c..._� SKETCH £1 OESCRIF iION GNLY _ �� ocEU a_ Y�r[a. rwuF USIONnE sunv[ron a u.wrcn NOT A BOI_INDWlY SURVEY SCALE 1'10 7LORIDA RECSTkvIDN CET:rICA'L NO 5702 SIGNING OAfE- /_ J FOR COLtICR fOiINTY GOVERNµFI,IT EIUARD OF C`TUP11� .OElr.0 >SiOr±: Fj YUT vnup wrlloui nlE oelcwnE' cNeaUnE & amSEO "IsossEo SEAL of FEORIDn r.t I IIREO CnOFE551ONAL =;VT,2YUR A'IO A.111 T T4lT T l lix'. GOLDEN GATE PAPYWAY IMPROVEMENTS SKETCH & DF,SCPIPTION OF: PERPETUAL, NON- EACLUSI "E ROAD coNsu, -,l: jL RIGIiT-OE -R'A). DRAINAGI; AND UT'ILIT'Y EA;�EML•NT %. • IT PARCEL 105 7050 NOIdNA1'LFSSFI.ORI1)A 74� �SUITE 270 Ph.(94I)64q -1509 Fax 194,)6497056 COLLIER. COUNTY, FLORIDA LFINT. W152 PFR 7EV1 1! `:ECTI1'rI M I BHP /aGE WA ,F DATE CRAV1W P•Y FILE NAME SHEET -(L'S ifi 25 42 75 1 0' 5 -17 -03 P,GC 0 0155 ✓105 1 OF NDrX NO Ny 16. 10.7 - �:_8 ?2 M: \( e P'•n . ':21,01 Fees 4- G2 -C2 \01 0(I22DC44SK1G56_,q No. !./ ' •t i � f 'is L'.."oi 1 WESI 1,4 coR_ 1 RSH- 11 F'ARI t t0. E1R ar' _in I 1 I kI M IT A F IE LI J.. Cr THE SUDM HALF SECT ON 25 - -49 �`'' �I' I 1 �rl •5 -.`Y VP'ERPETUAL. N0N- EXCLUSIVE tl _W11 r C ROAD RIGHT-OF -WAY, DRAIN _ AGE F 201 1 .6 AND UTILITY EASEMENT RACT J PARCEL 105 FAY i11ER G`ZE! OA11S. INC t30.93� (t. Il *" J� 2501 /1Z �a ^ \ PANTHER GREY OAKS. 1NC. L�- DR2501/1216 :nle� LNE TAH.E _ L LCN9 TT J US 4 _ CO CD FI 111E GEARING LENGTH - _ '89 5 9 t 0( C 8a -3U Oo'E 708.09 I LI r 89 34 3 E 1141.27 C2 1 d' 0.2817'E 604.78 15C0 5E 2 R.9B I� - ,g�TILI! L' " 4 :942817 w 61,3. o E 104_ a% r.. r n �... 3115... " .779.72 la __ < I 2'E l'v r:8 4'3009W _ 93C ps`E 334.38 15 _. .N99 J3',56 'E 294.26__ 15_ _..J 2524 E 40.00 �'99.3p355_W 294.26 "emu = I-a0�05 I'1 �LL r'009 "W [;: J: +AL RIGHT- OF -Wt.Y '�.��.- .ri�.El9 2a�2qOo00 j 1400'3C'U9 "W -EGAL jE5i RIPTION � CR PARCEL 105 BEIIJC. PART CF SECIICN 49 SOUTH, RA'a>E 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNT', FLORIDA -EPNG MORE PAR ''C ULARLI CESCR'KI, AS FOLLOWS- •HE ,4 COR!!ER JF 5"','-0 SECfiO'+ ;5; THENCE N89'34'3B"E. ALCNG THE NORTH LINE O SCUTH I, 2 OF SAID SECTION 25, A DISTANCE _)F 1141.27 FEET; THE ^ICF LAVING 'I,E SAID NORTH LINE, 5.00'25'22 °E, DISTANCE OF 259.98 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT- OF -'dJAY OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY (COUNTY ROAD BB6) AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 455, PAGE 275 OF THE P;BLiC RECOR -DS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING THE POINT OF BCGI 'JNING, THE'' -CE ALOr:G THE SAID SOI.THERIY RI'„HI- OF -WnY, TaE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) DESCR'BF_D ::CURSES; (I. TFIfNCE .89'29"E.. A DISTANCE '.0,16.• -_ET; 2) 'I+ENCE - ASIERLY AND SOUTIIEASTErILY 759.53 FF_T ALONG THE ARC OF A 'A.NGENnA'_ C;PC'JLAR CURVE ., PIG FIT 4A'J'I'JG A RADIUS OF 37( 9.,2 FEET IF+ ?UGH A CENTRAL ANGLE ^,F 12'0C'CO" AND BEING UBLNI)EC BY A CHORD '1MICH DEARS S.84'30'C9 -.. DISTANCE OF 788.09 FEET; ENCE 5.133 ^ ^9'E. A DISTAr!CE 33e 38 FELT; cC;JTIA ASTE!2Ll 306 21 FEET s� CMG T'-ir !-?C OF A TANGENTIAL CIFCULAR CURVE -0 THE LEFT !.,vllvG F:' +iIL:S 3869.72 �FtT '�I,Ot,Gl A :�:CT'L,I. .ir••iGLE OF 11'56'74" AND BEING SIJBILNDED BY A C!ICED `NFIb; 1I FEAFS ° 84'2E 17 "E , A nISTANCE C� K1,7B FEET; 8933 �F"�., A FVST,, ^NCE 294.28 T11EI „CE LE4'..! ".G TIT SAD D- 1v.vY. ;.60'26'24 "E., A DISTANCE OF IC.,() FEFT, '.FI:C[ 50 "O FFFT A; "D P;, -A Ft- T'J ' _ THE SAID SOUTHERLY RI••;I- 'I- OF -WA:Y, RUN ATSTERLY THE FOU_C''NI)!C: FIVE 151 DESCRIBED CC_!R`:�`. (1) TIIEFiCE SSQ'33'J5 "01'., A DISTANCE OF LP4.25 -Ell 312.57 EE' AI "OI':G -.II %PC A G_jTI,%L CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 3908.72 FELT `HROUGH A CE'.IF.AJ_ ANGLE OF -''a AND BE�NG SUBTEWED BY A CHORD WHICH BEARS 'J 84 �9'' 7 °','J . n DISTANCE ^F '13 0 FEET (zl - I;F "CE N_.'8'30'C9''A', A D1STrr,!CE _x,1.38 (a) T14FIICE 'IORTI,NESTERLY AND +ESTERI_Y -81.15 FE? SLONG THE ARC OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE T3 THE LEFT r:A.V[t,!O A RADIUS OF 3729.72 FEET THPOJGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12'00'00" AND BEING SJBTENDED BY A CH ^PD WHICH PEARS bl_34'3D'09`vv , A DISTANCE OF 779 72 FEET; (5) -14ENCE 5.89'29'51 N, A DISTANCE OF '046.47 E =T, TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT- OF- 'Y!AY, AS RECORDED IN OFFIGAI_ RECORDS BOOK 2064, PAGE 1164 OF T-.E "L;BLIC .RECORDS OF COLLIER, COUNTY, FLORIDA; THEr'I('E AiDONG -'HE SAID EASTEP.I.Y RIGi ,[-- :1F- WA7,',!.'0'30'09 "W., A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET, f0 THE POINT OF BEGItT ITT P!G: CCNTA.NING 130,834 SQUARE FEET, !MORE JR LESS /� CONTAINING 3 00 ACRES. IAOFE OR LESS. EXHIBIT A- Page o 9EAFINI]j nRC goC 0 JN NpF0. nr.c TSnN DnTC� (NAO) '901 -`P90 7.NL'StN�r1T s' %TC c 20 FDU:niE SYSTEN f-,l) 1111.1 rIORIN. Er'S1 ` '`00 5)U 1200 yr G• c..._� SKETCH £1 OESCRIF iION GNLY _ �� ocEU a_ Y�r[a. rwuF USIONnE sunv[ron a u.wrcn NOT A BOI_INDWlY SURVEY SCALE 1'10 7LORIDA RECSTkvIDN CET:rICA'L NO 5702 SIGNING OAfE- /_ J FOR COLtICR fOiINTY GOVERNµFI,IT EIUARD OF C`TUP11� .OElr.0 >SiOr±: Fj YUT vnup wrlloui nlE oelcwnE' cNeaUnE & amSEO "IsossEo SEAL of FEORIDn r.t I IIREO CnOFE551ONAL =;VT,2YUR A'IO A.111 T T4lT T l lix'. GOLDEN GATE PAPYWAY IMPROVEMENTS SKETCH & DF,SCPIPTION OF: PERPETUAL, NON- EACLUSI "E ROAD coNsu, -,l: jL RIGIiT-OE -R'A). DRAINAGI; AND UT'ILIT'Y EA;�EML•NT %. • IT PARCEL 105 7050 NOIdNA1'LFSSFI.ORI1)A 74� �SUITE 270 Ph.(94I)64q -1509 Fax 194,)6497056 COLLIER. COUNTY, FLORIDA LFINT. W152 PFR 7EV1 1! `:ECTI1'rI M I BHP /aGE WA ,F DATE CRAV1W P•Y FILE NAME SHEET -(L'S ifi 25 42 75 1 0' 5 -17 -03 P,GC 0 0155 ✓105 1 OF NDrX NO Ny 16. 10.7 - �:_8 ?2 M: \( e P'•n . ':21,01 Fees 4- G2 -C2 \01 0(I22DC44SK1G56_,q No. !./ ' •t i � f 'is L'.."oi 1 VIIIsl'C 1 LAJ14_l l a.sar o_n LL LEGAL DESCR!PTII,,,�! FOR PARCEL 901A 13 EIN PJ 25 07,'J'J P 44 ��U�' RAH +GE 25 LAST, COLUER COUNTY, 1 0,- ,4CPE PART CULAR Y DLSC J_ED AS FOLLOWS. EAST 1 �4 �Oi dF Ll �A J��I 2G, THEr,iCE S C0'28'�i2'W ALQfd' hF :SST �_� \E -Er7. "° THE S;;uT'�E , S i /4 tzAID SECTION 75 A DISTA�'CE OF 703. 2 FOR_ COLLIER CO',NTY GOVFI ?wInEF +T ,30,kRQ OF C0U!viti C&,gpSSiUrtERS MENCC ! �A E : -vih F�,;, '' 'N , A Dl T y ;E CF FEET, TC ?HE Ill I F co>✓_urnrJc THENCE `r 'i 0.00 FELI ,LONG SRC Jr A CIRCULAR CURVE TO `HE R G7,HT HA'04C, A RADIUS ; -)F 56` .� 3 FEET T1,R000H A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'Oo C�" aP n FI�C SU6fGNDED U'r i'��C��C D '7!� CI E =n.RS S 01'7525 °E., A DIST.AIJCE OF '0..0 =EET. JOB NUMBER 01- OOIS.In aEwSION + THENCE _.38 "4 '?4 "d, DISi:1rJCE OF 5.:J . =EE rHEPd N CE N. S'2 'b`J , A '?IST4hl;'E OF .CC FEE` -iEP J g. c - - Sr.11 A .,I \!��_ Cr _ __ _ _ . ., -CT. �U l LiL ❑L I'i l _;E ilh � -!i �I'�;1`]', . ',1�_- �n _ C�� ;rE FEE`, kllC ADEN TEE No._ JAN i _�ga EXHIBIT SKETCH & DESCRIPTIO!v ONLY page 140T A 90UNDAP.Y SUPVEY 1 ��•. FOR_ COLLIER CO',NTY GOVFI ?wInEF +T ,30,kRQ OF C0U!viti C&,gpSSiUrtERS GOLDEN GATE P„P.fin'A'i IM1IPRCVcL,fEN'1S SKE'T'CH & DE.SCRIPI ;7 -10 OF: 5' X 10' IVIVE UTILITY LAMMEN'F co>✓_urnrJc PARCEL. 901A 1 �- • •1 CULLIEP. COUNTY. rLOR;UA 105Q NC)RTit HURSFC}IOE DRf"E. SUrTE 2)0 NAT'L. .rIOR10A)hlne f6 f9s1)6<9 -t'. Va Fu (9Ai)(a9 -)V54 l.R No 652 JOB NUMBER 01- OOIS.In aEwSION + SEC !OI -! 7pvrvSHIP 2ANGE SCALE DATE DRAWN DY nl_E NAME S7IEET 25 49 25 ";ONE 5- 't -q?. REr el- C015SK901rt 2 0 2 =NDEX No ADEN TEE No._ JAN i _�ga X I I I'Ll IT A OR '046 J111 C' :11E 5�'� —,J �'CT'Y4 -4- 5 X 10' WIDE, 'NT F i io' WIDE rPL EAMMENI CEMENT OR 85/845 �--SASI 1/4 COR SLC. 2b----- I,1 -2 POINT OF PAPCEI- 901A , I I ft fjD ! BEGiNN NG IA-51ATT PARINERSMP SIRAP NO. 492525 ()01 0004A25 I OR 1428/1349 LINION. If,N1)FD & l•us"', DR :332/1004 0 + < 43-00 435,c0 GOLDEN GATE PAR✓WY e SURVEY 1�0 CO -.3c .0a .0 2 GENERAL NOTE BASELINE + OR -03/.654 F= CDr i A -UNE !ABLE Ti -H� RADiUS I DELIA F --j- . 0 —LE LENGTH .,& : , c Do LINE C, E:-:- cic '15 C4 so, ,3.7 2 '00'2P III L F -- -- Aj' 7,3 Ot� V, 500 L3 S -4 B'4," 34 V1 _ -- " --1-0 —00- L4 26"W EXHIBIT A Page_ IL of-zz- 8EARMS ARE BASED UN 40RIM A-R—�J C41ZIV f COOID-7E SYSIEM MIR)) FO, rLQRtU- `AST 20"E 0 -,5 15C 300 9, (P��CA IPTION ONLY S K ETCH &, DESCRIPTION !I 311M 111� Roc SMvEIOR I —IPM ------ NOT SURVEY A BOUNDARY EII 1j 0, NOT VALIO "T" IIIE ORIGI-L SIMA16W & RnISEn EMBOSSED SfAt 01 FOR: COLLIER COUNTY GOVIRNUENI BOARD OF COtNTT COW/ASSIONEPS o GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS PUN' VT EASEMENT PARCEL 901A IV5U NORTH I I VRSES1,OF, DRIVE, SUITE 270 NAPLES, FLORIDA 341114 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA to 00 2Et25 6� EXHIBIT A Page_ IL of-zz- 8EARMS ARE BASED UN 40RIM A-R—�J C41ZIV (.AO) 198a-199. AU,111- "I - 7 It RI AlE COOID-7E SYSIEM MIR)) FO, rLQRtU- `AST 20"E 0 -,5 15C 300 9, (P��CA IPTION ONLY S K ETCH &, DESCRIPTION !I 311M 111� Roc SMvEIOR I —IPM ------ NOT SURVEY A BOUNDARY --- SCALE: 1'-150, 'LOR�T.A REGISTRATION C11�1101 SIG—C DATE 7 NOT VALIO "T" IIIE ORIGI-L SIMA16W & RnISEn EMBOSSED SfAt 01 FOR: COLLIER COUNTY GOVIRNUENI BOARD OF COtNTT COW/ASSIONEPS A rLORIIIA REGISIERED —Essw— SURVEYOR All m _ER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS PUN' -SKETCH 1k DESCRIPTION OF: 5' X 10' WIDE 1,;I'ILI'F) EASEMENT PARCEL 901A IV5U NORTH I I VRSES1,OF, DRIVE, SUITE 270 NAPLES, FLORIDA 341114 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA Ph (941)649.150 T.x(941)649-7056 le N1 VeFT, REVISION ISECTION 11OWN-1111 I RANGE I SCALE - 11015.15 , 1 1 26 49 25 15C' ED Nan 6952 OAT E DRAWN �;E, ,,Ey FILE NALIE SI-1EET 5-11-C3 1 _ I �, �) n I _5 5t"901A I I OF 2 AGEND m No... JAN 13 2,094 Pg. \ EXIM311' A u k; v. has o'E N�_ �_EGA:_ OESCRIP i I09J FOR PARCEL 90 I D B[:hC A?i '� SF 1uPJ �'hd61 til� -` �;OUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, 'LOLL!Ek COUIJIY �LCIFRZA D�_. IDEO AS f OLLON'S_ �CMtidENCE AT THE EAST 1i' - -RNEB SAID SECTIOPd E5; THENCE I d, 01'0907"1V., \LOt1G T1,E _ Sf .IPJc "r�l IFE:45i '/4 OF SAID SECTION 26, A DISTANCE OF 383.97 FEEL THENCE I_EA I�G TnE SAID - ^ST LINE, S -S'�;0 53 "IiJ., A DISTANCE CF 1 -EFT, 70 A °OII�IT � THL Nc� F�_Y�I ,,F A;RPCRT —F 'L_ING ? / +.D (CCUI�Tv CAD 3! ) AS FECOPHD N 1 ),' CIAL !- CCRDS BOC P ' 45, PAGE 03 OF HE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER I_'OJ�iTY, `L JD,A Af ��I'VC !!-IF POINT OF DE INITNKJ , `yE Jl c r, ()I`!G laP L 7f:IG ",'E_•TE?CY RIGF OF —WAY, S 05'45',8"E , ,a DiSTMq ,F OF 0.00 fC ', T EI�CE L N� ,4F -- SAIi; LY IC' -i- OF— NAY, S P 4 •I4 ' -a2"W , .1 LIS`ANCE OF ?4.20 uLI "; F D, :S: C nD Fc_T_ 1/1 20 FEET, TO THE POINT OF 9 L G I N N I r EXHIBIT 4 SKETCH & DESCRIPTION ONLY Page /,/ of /Y- NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY FOP, COLLIER COUIVY GO' ✓ERNIAENT 30ARD DF CO'Jt:1Y C06.I MISSIO JERS GOLDEN GATE PAP.[CWAY I?,1PROFEt`tENTS T�T� SKETCFI & DESCIZIP'1'ION OP: 1C' WIDE UCILi'I'Y EASEn4F,"l- coN=w:2lrua PARCEI, 9019 %- • •1 1050 NORTPI 14ORSESHOE DRIVE, SURE 210 COI,LIEP, COUNTY, FLORIDA NAPLES, FLORIDA 34](14 I'h. O9 1) 649 -1509 F.x (941) 649 -]056 LO No 6952 409 NUMBER REVISION SECTIUr: i0'A�NSH'�P RANGE SCALE DATE DRAWN 9v FILE NAME SHEET 01- 0015.16 1 26 49 25 -0 ^, 5 -11 -D3 ?EC 01- 0015SK9019 Z OF Z N � `��7 JAIL 1 3 0d4 Pg. C�o� 428�OC <) ^..,p 4!04CO 411 +00 432 +DO 113+ GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY 5 SURVEY DER OR 219x,533 �I 1 POINCIANNA PROFFESSIONAL PARK OR 1303/1654 ' RExRlucs AaE RASED a �oarN A FRmn.r D.AIwx CORD) TTE S'S'SO 'GRID) FOR LORR . EAST COORDI�4nTC S�Sltl !,C SID', FOR FLOR J4 EAST 2E:NE I _ LINE TABLE - -- LI'dE BEARINC LEN ' IH L1 I'AMBIT A _ 3P3.97 7779 10.00 T 14 )0_ I 86'5 053 N sU5 15 18 F 5 °4'14 4a dJ JO_'M1v 5'Pi I I I I L5_ 1000 —I_S 1 1 81, JA'42'G 1 14 .)Q i 11ALSTATT FnPTNERSH!P 434 +00 1 SIFAP NO- 492_`:5 ^_C' 00,04A25 .tit C 44: / I C1 1 II ,) �I AI I a y0° Ci AGO i t, ' 10' 'uVIDE I I�/111 ! UTILIT'r EASEMENT NOTE y PARCEL 9011 8 �1 I I o �cT I 142 sq. 't. ! -y `�� e C N >oZC UIi F• \ 4 Page ofd' I 1 I DR 1332 /'cox II � + t A N - — — -- - c 110 4;DF FP1 -ASEHE:fI O12 185/3x5 j S, Wl`- LI!:E Or THE 51Jl1N HALE SECION 2E 19-25 II - c till �_- 11 _PROI'L "RU =TEES 1 l :)R 1332/1004 p' 428�OC <) ^..,p 4!04CO 411 +00 432 +DO 113+ GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY 5 SURVEY DER OR 219x,533 �I 1 POINCIANNA PROFFESSIONAL PARK OR 1303/1654 ' RExRlucs AaE RASED a �oarN A FRmn.r D.AIwx CORD) TTE S'S'SO 'GRID) FOR LORR . EAST COORDI�4nTC S�Sltl !,C SID', FOR FLOR J4 EAST 2E:NE I _ LINE TABLE - -- LI'dE BEARINC LEN ' IH L1 N01'C9 Ui IV _ 3P3.97 7779 10.00 T 14 )0_ L2 _ L? 86'5 053 N sU5 15 18 F 5 °4'14 4a dJ JO_'M1v 5'Pi L4 I L5_ 1000 —I_S 1 1 81, JA'42'G 1 14 .)Q POINT OF BEGINNING 0 75 :5D 300 RY / Et.L -y. C -.— .-- POINT OF ROGER C. GPNR, fR!)FESSIONAL SURVEYOR k MA—ER COr,t!, ENCE' E,JT FLORIDA REG15TRATIW OERIIFI lC N0, >02 1 /4 COR._ I SEC. 25 SIGNING DATE: S- Z Y'n --FAST -- 110' WIDE F�L EAS'7MLNT -- -- OR 1155/845 f i 11ALSTATT FnPTNERSH!P 434 +00 1 SIFAP NO- 492_`:5 ^_C' 00,04A25 . ^R In28 /'3M19 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER C LINTY, FLCP.IDA 1 ,) a y0° Ci AGO 0 75 :5D 300 RY / Et.L -y. C -.— .-- SKETCH & D= SCPIPTION ONLY ROGER C. GPNR, fR!)FESSIONAL SURVEYOR k MA—ER NOT A POUNDARY SURVEY FLORIDA REG15TRATIW OERIIFI lC N0, >02 SCALE' I'-A50' SIGNING DATE: S- Z Y'n FOR COI UER �nIjNTY G^VERNVENT HOARD OF COUNTY COI- AMS4OI�ERS NOT VALID N+THONE DIE DRFGNJ SIGNATURE h RASED EUSDSSED SEAS OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIOM! SURVEYOR AND L1AFPER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IMPROMMEN'rs f SKF'I'CII k DESSRIP "fIO;J OF: 10' WIDE 01'ILPEY EASEMENT 434 +00 435 +0'J _ • �r .d j n�C. i� NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER C LINTY, FLCP.IDA 1 P + GENERAL NOTE y @ = BASELINE EXHIBIT A Page ofd' 0 75 :5D 300 RY / Et.L -y. C -.— .-- SKETCH & D= SCPIPTION ONLY ROGER C. GPNR, fR!)FESSIONAL SURVEYOR k MA—ER NOT A POUNDARY SURVEY FLORIDA REG15TRATIW OERIIFI lC N0, >02 SCALE' I'-A50' SIGNING DATE: S- Z Y'n FOR COI UER �nIjNTY G^VERNVENT HOARD OF COUNTY COI- AMS4OI�ERS NOT VALID N+THONE DIE DRFGNJ SIGNATURE h RASED EUSDSSED SEAS OF A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIOM! SURVEYOR AND L1AFPER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IMPROMMEN'rs f SKF'I'CII k DESSRIP "fIO;J OF: 10' WIDE 01'ILPEY EASEMENT U.— Ula1." 4- T • 1 PARCEL 901F 7050 NORTTI IIORSFSDOG DIII STATE 270 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER C LINTY, FLCP.IDA P0. 1941)649 -1509 Fa. (941)649 -7056 NU126FR F:. E' + "E'.'_)N SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE _ 701 :6 • +9 25 x'•50 LB No.: 6952 DATE DR /VO'N HY FILE NAPE SHEF_T 5- 11 - -03 REC 01- 0015SK90 +B 1 OF 2 AGENDA-,. EEFN JAN t ]1 2004 i';HtL'I "1' A _EGAL - SCPIP -1 l Fd FOR PARCEL 9o3A 3CI�d RT �F S CT N 21 ull1 hl 4 OUf� -, rrNC-E 25 LAST. _;,LLEP. COUNTY, FLOP LA 3EIf1C I.10PE PAPi ClL 0 -_LY 5 ,,3rD AS FCLLJi'VS, CO•'i "JEI"CE P.T THE EAST A • :6; Tf~FNCE S 0'78 42 W_, Al9NIC 11AL FAST i!E O� HL AC 1008 Z� _Er. 4 D� SAID ,ECT�0� 76, A DISTANCE C)F �ENC EA \IV(, T-E C'.._ EAS` _ E, ^' F?9 3t 8'� ^r. A D "F _5C CO POINT OE C�CIP! ;IP•; STAi�iCE OJ FEET, TO TTIE -HF C E CU, to ESTEFLY hvC _' :1iN- - i�E SAID _AST NE. S 8'42 1N.. A DIST >, ',CE CF _ ;0 FEET; THENCE N 89',3 18 N- A - SC f4ll_ CF 7O X FEET, TO THE �t,ESTEPLY :'IJE OF A CITY OF !:'\FLES WATR UTILITY "S AS RCCCPDFD IN OFFICIAL PE .0 °DS ?OOK 1565, PAGE J62 F TAE CCL COLII,ITY, FLOKICA; V'FS:FRI ` D� J' , EI CO'28'42'E , A DISTA ACE (J 10.00 FEET; _F'J E E -; JI �A C 11E Fi�L I E. S 89' 18'E A D STA''tC F 20 0" FEET TO CI''JT �F .;VLJrs,.�,il`d:, 20C J4 \h:E - SET ,FIST =- _ EXHIBIT SKETCH R DESCRIPTION ONLY Pa9E3 Zi of NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY _ FOR: COLtIFR CQVNTv GOVERNMENT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GCLllEN Gd'I'E PARKWAY 1A FROVEMI:NTS WA SKETCH k DESCMPTION OF 10' X 20' WIDE GTILPCY SASEMEN'f co u a "iN'c;\ PARCM, 903A '050 NOPTII HORSESf TOE DRIVE. SUITE 370 COLLIBI? COU \':'Y, FLOPMA NAMHS, FLORIDA 3410 I`h. (9a 1)649.1309 Fn;(9A1)6A9. 7056 LB h G9Si JCB NI; I✓BEl? PC VISION S4 G"ICN TO4;1'SHIP RANGE SCALE 047E CAAVlN By rliE NAME SKEET 01 GO'1 5 1 25 49 25 NONE 5 -11 -03 REC Oi 00t5SK903A 2 OF 2 NVEX N b: J/ S N' p c^ n f AMBIT A ,1 - 28 101, 91 A- I A301CQ 1!1-00 A_'2 -N00 -N00 I33+QU 17-01 '1 — GOLD,- GATE FARKWAI r:Ty OF 1,1ER Ji,,,ITY J�I.ST- CR PONCA JIJA PROFFESSONAL PARK OR 1393"IF154 T 0' X 20' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT 'Z!ARCEL 903A 2r,9 su 't, L6 ili 131,—CS ATIE 0A5[D ON -DIIN 1',lEAll— I';"- CNI,D) 1980.T990 ST.11 1 11L COORD."mE 5v57E,. 1 F— ZONE + GENERAL I,101E Q = BASELINE F�OINT OF BEGINNING 4/ T, T, L > 26 25 LINE -AELE INE BEARING I-ENGTH ----F --B IN —1 �( )&0-2 )8 85 —L-3 500' 4 Lv) 0.00 I_4 N89'31'18' 20.00 _L5 N00 C- ^U_ SE!9*3; 18'E 20.0O — -- EXHIBIT -r-�- Page , Of _LL u 15 150 300 11 ^ crn E - SKETCH & DESCRIPTION ONLY ,.'ER G. (`;�I[R. PROFESS!ON , SURVEYOR & 'AA-EN NOT A 9OUNDARY SURVEY opMDA fjR.IE NO 5702 SCAI.E ]"-150 64, c,3 NO;VALIO WHAOU' ITR ORIGINAL SIGNATURE & RAISED E�EIOSSEO S(Al 0 FOR* COLLIER COUNTY GOVER141,1ENT BOARD OF COON COMM Ig SIIJPJF RS A ,e R*A KCIVERED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND —ER. GOLDEN G,x']E IIAEKWAY IMPROVEMENTS SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF: 10' X 20' WIDE, UTILITY EASEmEN'r PARCEL 903A COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1NI-VBER E✓ISION I --ciloll lcwljs!vf� I SCALE 0 015 15 1 1 26 49 1 25 15 0. 3030 NORT11 HOP. ESIIOEVRIVIE, SUITF27D NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 Ph.(941)649-1,b, "'x(941)649 -7056 LO NR.- 052 DATE DRAWN By TILE NAME "HI-EIT 5 -11 -03 1 RED I 01-0015SK9WA I OF No JAN !J'LY TINE OF 50IJIH '#ALF SEC I!014 -,15-4 Ji F POINT OF �E COMMENCEMENT NT Iz CAST 1/4 COR- SEC. 26 > -Al-IIITI IARINERSIUP 140, 492525 001 (10CW5 OR 1428/1,148 11,1701. -YI10 "Z� A SPROLK -rUSIEES 0� 1332/ 1004 I A301CQ 1!1-00 A_'2 -N00 -N00 I33+QU 17-01 '1 — GOLD,- GATE FARKWAI r:Ty OF 1,1ER Ji,,,ITY J�I.ST- CR PONCA JIJA PROFFESSONAL PARK OR 1393"IF154 T 0' X 20' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT 'Z!ARCEL 903A 2r,9 su 't, L6 ili 131,—CS ATIE 0A5[D ON -DIIN 1',lEAll— I';"- CNI,D) 1980.T990 ST.11 1 11L COORD."mE 5v57E,. 1 F— ZONE + GENERAL I,101E Q = BASELINE F�OINT OF BEGINNING 4/ T, T, L > 26 25 LINE -AELE INE BEARING I-ENGTH ----F --B IN —1 �( )&0-2 )8 85 —L-3 500' 4 Lv) 0.00 I_4 N89'31'18' 20.00 _L5 N00 C- ^U_ SE!9*3; 18'E 20.0O — -- EXHIBIT -r-�- Page , Of _LL u 15 150 300 11 ^ crn E - SKETCH & DESCRIPTION ONLY ,.'ER G. (`;�I[R. PROFESS!ON , SURVEYOR & 'AA-EN NOT A 9OUNDARY SURVEY opMDA fjR.IE NO 5702 SCAI.E ]"-150 64, c,3 NO;VALIO WHAOU' ITR ORIGINAL SIGNATURE & RAISED E�EIOSSEO S(Al 0 FOR* COLLIER COUNTY GOVER141,1ENT BOARD OF COON COMM Ig SIIJPJF RS A ,e R*A KCIVERED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND —ER. GOLDEN G,x']E IIAEKWAY IMPROVEMENTS SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF: 10' X 20' WIDE, UTILITY EASEmEN'r PARCEL 903A COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1NI-VBER E✓ISION I --ciloll lcwljs!vf� I SCALE 0 015 15 1 1 26 49 1 25 15 0. 3030 NORT11 HOP. ESIIOEVRIVIE, SUITF27D NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 Ph.(941)649-1,b, "'x(941)649 -7056 LO NR.- 052 DATE DRAWN By TILE NAME "HI-EIT 5 -11 -03 1 RED I 01-0015SK9WA I OF No JAN EXHIBIT -r-�- Page , Of _LL u 15 150 300 11 ^ crn E - SKETCH & DESCRIPTION ONLY ,.'ER G. (`;�I[R. PROFESS!ON , SURVEYOR & 'AA-EN NOT A 9OUNDARY SURVEY opMDA fjR.IE NO 5702 SCAI.E ]"-150 64, c,3 NO;VALIO WHAOU' ITR ORIGINAL SIGNATURE & RAISED E�EIOSSEO S(Al 0 FOR* COLLIER COUNTY GOVER141,1ENT BOARD OF COON COMM Ig SIIJPJF RS A ,e R*A KCIVERED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND —ER. GOLDEN G,x']E IIAEKWAY IMPROVEMENTS SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF: 10' X 20' WIDE, UTILITY EASEmEN'r PARCEL 903A COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1NI-VBER E✓ISION I --ciloll lcwljs!vf� I SCALE 0 015 15 1 1 26 49 1 25 15 0. 3030 NORT11 HOP. ESIIOEVRIVIE, SUITF27D NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 Ph.(941)649-1,b, "'x(941)649 -7056 LO NR.- 052 DATE DRAWN By TILE NAME "HI-EIT 5 -11 -03 1 RED I 01-0015SK9WA I OF No JAN F I11111T A LEGAL FOR ?ARCEL 9038 3L' °1T )� St_CT!O'J S'DI_;TFi. RANGE 25 EAS-1, CC'.1. ER COUNTY, r CR DA 3EIt�G MORE PART.CL,I ARiY DESC . -iED AS FOLLOWS, CO ".III!ENCE A.T THE EAST 1 i4 � - C Ft,jE ALONG tIIE EAST LINE OF ;HE SOUTHLA�? 859.5, FEET. 7� -�EWCE LFAVING 7hE SAID EAST SAID SECT!CN 26; -HENCE 00'28 42"Vd., %4 OF SAID SECTION 26. A [,ISTAt`iCE OF , - 8 "'N , A DISTANCE :F _`'C.'JU lr EET, TO 1 F1E THENCE -CCo 'NESTERLY F \N'D �'A ALLcL 4!1H HE SAID EAST LINE, S.C'0'2'8'42 ff, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE N 39'31'18 "W., A DISTANCE OF _'0,00 FEET, TO "HE '"W STERL'r L'NE OF CITY OF wA ALES JiATER J1 LITY EASEME'AT. AS �ECC?DED iN OFFICIAL RECCRDS 30CK 1566, FACE 462 OF THE PUBL`C P.ECOFDS Y FLORIC.A; TtD''DE °L01 7HE SAD 1'1ES FF'L I`,F 1 0'2842 "F A DISTANCE CF 10.00 `EET; 1 E� 'F E;AV L1 -'..c AIL` VJF_,rFD 13°F., A DISTANCE '�F 20.00 FEET, 'C F E CI .T ON HG NNIN '-: - I, G :C rA L LET J :E SS. EXHIBIT 4 SKEICI( & DESCR!P1tON ONLr Page L of / NOT A 50UN04RY SURVEY FOR C01_LI"P CC iN'r GOVERNMENT BOARD OF COUNT (.'Ot.ItAliS,C) 4ERS GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS FKETCH & DESCRIPTION OP: 10' X 70' WIM UTILITY EASEMENT c�T Ti PARCEL 9 03I? ♦ T .L 3050 NVR'fii H025EC}fOE URfl'L, SUITE 170 COLLIER COUti I'Y, FLORIDA NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 Ph.(941)649 -15179 6x(941)649.7056 J(:B N(,1476ER REV!SION SEC'i0N 'OWt.SNIR RA'1GE cll]-F L1 ILF1 t O1 -0015 16 1 DATE DRAWN BY FILE MA.N.E SNEEI 26 49 25 !�OF.'E 5 -11 -03 REC O1-- OU155k90,i? INDEX M1'O Y If ;i • i '' G - I.;' EXHIBIT T A REARINf,S N:f DASED GN IOPIN "ERICAN DeIlm ("AD) 1489 -1990 AGJl STNEN1 STATE e, A1[ COORD'NAIE S *s1EIa (GRID) rOR FLORNA rAST ZONE GENERAL NC1E I = BASELINE _d E Tno =E i� GOLDEN GATE PARVA'AI' '.10' WIDE :Pl EASEUEN7 ! DR 165/845 I'I I,� I j ( ! I.10' WIDE I -PL EA6EUENT OR 5 N Lv UNE Or 11E SOUIII HALF SE[-3 O T :6 -49 s ,A IZ 75`74 a � POIrJGAN!dA PROFFESS!ONAL ^Aar. � Oa �3C /ta54 i — O G'Y pf I,r,PL =S I!� l E6�4`2 10.00 I fl VIII I�r I UTILITY EASEMENTS aARCEL 908 _ /L =I ;I Ic POINT OF COMMENCE'�1ENT }Z A EAST 1/4 OCR. IIIp > SEC- 2.6 HM1ISTATT PARINER51 /17 STRAP t 492325 001 000025 OR +428/1348 / In In /von —70N, HYNDR3- & SPROUL 7R'JSTEES OR 133i /lCOe ° F /III -II O�j I II co 13, co 4J4+ n DO 435 +G0 REARINf,S N:f DASED GN IOPIN "ERICAN DeIlm ("AD) 1489 -1990 AGJl STNEN1 STATE e, A1[ COORD'NAIE S *s1EIa (GRID) rOR FLORNA rAST ZONE GENERAL NC1E I = BASELINE _d E Tno =E f l - j GOLDEN GATE PARVA'AI' 859.67 ,A IZ —ilea a � POIrJGAN!dA PROFFESS!ONAL ^Aar. ',� � 1 — �s Oa �3C /ta54 i — O G'Y pf I,r,PL =S A E6�4`2 10.00 _� t L5 S89'ZI'18'E I�r 10' X 20' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENTS aARCEL 908 _ /L =I I REARINf,S N:f DASED GN IOPIN "ERICAN DeIlm ("AD) 1489 -1990 AGJl STNEN1 STATE e, A1[ COORD'NAIE S *s1EIa (GRID) rOR FLORNA rAST ZONE GENERAL NC1E I = BASELINE _d E Tno =E f l - j q` q 'IG_ 859.67 ,A IZ —ilea -_ —LZ_ —1 00� . az' w to -oo - + z �sJ m I REARINf,S N:f DASED GN IOPIN "ERICAN DeIlm ("AD) 1489 -1990 AGJl STNEN1 STATE e, A1[ COORD'NAIE S *s1EIa (GRID) rOR FLORNA rAST ZONE GENERAL NC1E I = BASELINE _d E Tno =E f l - j q` q 'IG_ 859.67 —ilea -_ —LZ_ —1 00� . az' w to -oo - L4 RO 3) 1q .N 20.00 5 10.00 _� t L5 S89'ZI'18'E 20.00 0 1.5 _ 150 300 BY. / 5 - SKETCH & DESCRIPTION ONLY �� G. E4emEn, rPOr[ssloNnL sDeiE�oR & u4rPER NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY 'LORRoc[IRA REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE N 5702 SCATE -. 1 -150 .flm- DATE 4, N VALID WPM IHE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE & RNSED V-'BOSSEO SEAL Of FOR: CCUL FR COUNTY GOVFRNMENT BOARD OF COUNTY CON'WISSIIJA E R5 4 FIORIDA REGIS'ERED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND FIAPPER. ' T4f'r T I INI. '<HIBIT jA 4th of-4L GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS SKI:TCII & DESCRIPTION OF: 10' X 20' 'KIDF, UTILI'TY E,SEMENT col T'll 1r�+c. �. � I1 PARCEL 903H 3050 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE SUITE 270 NAPLES, I'CORIDA 341 u4 COLLIER COUN "1'Y, FLORIDA rn. (9.p 649 -189 r'��. 1941) W -7056 LB Nv.. (9.2 � F3 FIVNE?F_R REv";IJIJ SEC TIGN l')7JSHIn RANGE SC;�L= DATE DRAwIJ BY FILE NAME SHEET OOt�.16 1 26 49 ;.5 REC C1- DOTSSR 9039 1 1 OF h' �� <;,. , `t La EXHIBIT 1 ECAL Dr`iCP�01 ;C', ;FOR PAPCEL 903C JUNG -ART OF SECTION 26, �OVd1.;SFlli, 4) F�_Oi?iDA BEING fIOPE SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, CCLuER COU W Y, PARTICULAIIIY DES'---T 3ED AS FOLLOWS. C01,11: E CE Al- `HE cAs" 1 CSC E AID SECTIIDN "6; -HENCE S.1_1-28 Z,2 'VV., \I ONG THE LAST LI ^at CF `HE 709.5 7 -EET; u', .F 4 OF SAID SECTION 26, a VISTA ![ [ OF 'HENCE LEAVE :NG THE SAID EAST °UiNT OF EGINf�iIh:G; I NE, 18 "'h'., A DISTA ^ICE -'F 50.Q0 FELT, TO THE ` TF+ENCE -1000 NESFEFL.Y AND =F,R LLr_ :II;H 'HE SAID EAST LINE, S- 00'23'112 `N- q DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; I ENCE '\I 89',31'18"W- A DS gNCE OF `0 FEET, TO 'HE WESIFRLY i NE OF A �DF CITY Or IvAPi ES %Iv'ATER i,r,LITY E4SEVEN P,'-" `- -CORDED iN OFFICfAL RECORDS BOOK 1565, SAGE 462 OF THE =JE31LIC RECORDS O! : COUNTY, FLORIDA; `HP,JC� ALONG THE SAID AFSTER_'7 I J�:E, '' 00'Z� �i2 E, A DISTANCE !`F ' n.C10 -,-ET "HENCE _E aV HIS T!iE SAD h E =-'E RL _ S 89'31' 18 "E . A DISTANCE 'O :_ul FEET, 10 H~ POII,,T C. REG!1 fJ IJG; SKETCEI & DESCRIPTION ONLY NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR COLDER C01,'NTY GOVFRNPENT BOARD Ot C)0IdY OON.1 :1550 •'c "R$ GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS SKETCH & DESCRIP'PION OF: 10. % 20' ',Vlllii UTILCFY E ISENENT PARCEL 9030 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JOB NUI,41I REVISION SECTION 'OWNSFIP RAIJGE ';CAI =_ 01- 0015.16 1 1 -6 49 25 ^ONO 'NOEX ISO._ EXHIBIT r7 Page 1g 3050 N(1R. 11310R S ESNOF DMVE. SUITE 710 NA r LFS, FLORIDA WN Ph . 19-11) 649 -1509 F-(911)649 -7056 LB N. 6953 DATE I DRAWN By I FILE NAVE SHEET s —`1 -c3 REC oI- 00!55 <9ojc z OF 2 No. _ jt��I i � 't ;5 I f ZUJ4 - a� EXHIBIT A I •1 a :IC WIDE F9l En.SE61F:4T 1 5 on 1es /eae -� IT L„ LINE OF THE SOL'111 NA: -r SE('TION 25- 49 -25 III Al T r I HNLPV Ll WON, O1J ` OR 1352 /104 _ TRU: iFES I I 110 WIUE FPL E /,SEVENT OR lit i POINT OF COMMENCELdENT EAST 1/4 COR. SEC. 26 NALSTAIT PARRJERSNIP STRAP NO, 492525 0010004A25 i OR 142,8/1348 2 � ,2 � I c L-- TABLE— _L)�iE I )HE __ L1 — L2 — L3 -4 _s — 16 — S0C_28.42 °W '439'31'1& °W ;CO'26'42 1y N89.31,18 "IN raoo•2a'a2 °E - SB9'31'13 °E - LENGTH 709.67 _ 50.00 10.00 2060 . 10.00 70 CO uo 1. 42111 CO 129,OD I3P-cc 431400 4324.00 :. 3�0G M134iDD 435. -DD GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY suRVE. i' C'A 'ER OP ;194,55' { I I GENERAL NOTE 10' X 20' WDE UTILITY EASEMENT 1 L6� '@ = BASELINE ° ARCEL 903C I + �f P � L�II I L2 I pomc"N,d �RoFLE65i0141L PARK OR 1-03/1854 Igo L4I to I POINT OF •�,t , 11� BEGIWNING I'I � , i I � I I ,.,._. -.. I ,•IV of U 'n�1�, � ER nT ES U LOITr ;r.IT � I c L-- TABLE— _L)�iE I )HE __ L1 — L2 — L3 -4 _s — 16 — S0C_28.42 °W '439'31'1& °W ;CO'26'42 1y N89.31,18 "IN raoo•2a'a2 °E - SB9'31'13 °E - LENGTH 709.67 _ 50.00 10.00 2060 . 10.00 70 CO IV J w � D U D N 211; 25 � Im EXHIBIT Page of 1 13(4R—S ARE EACFO ON —11I AuERWIN DAIUM 1988 -19 ?0 st4TE RUrJE COOROIN;.TE SYSTEM (OR'D) FOR FLORIDA EAST 20NE ) _ e SKETCH & DESCRIPTION ONLY e, 1,6GERQ FFR• -(IrESVONAl SURVEYOR & .1-ER NOT A POUNDARY SURVEY — FLORIDA RE6IPRATI9N CER- INCATE NO 5707 SCALE : 1" =150' 5113.101 DATE: S. -z2_4, FOR: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT BOARD OF CUUNIY -OkW SSIOF ERS 4DrLOSm� REC SiER DE RNDFEISSIONA�NS,IU141OOR AND OM^M.BORS5E0 RA( CE GOLDEN GATE PAEKWAY IMPROVEMENTS ''{\��■� SHGTCH & DESCRIPTION OF: 10' X 20' v IDE. UTILITY Ej SEMENT r_o �suci`1N� �. • � 1 ii PARCEL 903C 1050 NOR 111110RSES110FORIVE,SDITE270 NAPLES FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Ph.(941)649 -1509 F-(941)649 -'1056 LB No - 6x52 '.- NUhI EfER RFVISIONI SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE SC /! DATE DRAWN BY FILE NAME SHEET ,01516 1 26 49 25 •:0' 5 -11 -03 REC U1 0015SK90JC 1 CE 2 d No. —— S A IN 13 21-0" "3 PRESENTED TO THE JOINT CITY /COUNTY WORKSHOP JANUARY 5, 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A REVIEW OF ALL FEASIBLE PLANNING & DESIGN ALTERNATIVES (CONVENTIONAL & UNCONVENTIONAL) FOR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT AIRPORT PULLING ROAD /GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND THEIR IMPACT ON ALL OTHER MAJOR INTERSECTIONS ALONG THE GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY CORRIDOR A GRADE SEPARATED OVERPASS IS THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE ACHIEVING AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICE IN 2025 WHILE PROVIDING THE MOST COST EFFECTIVE, LONG -TERM BENEFIT TO TAXPAYERS. OBJECTIVE: To present comprehensive data, analysis and information to the Board of County Commissioners, Naples City Council, and Collier County citizens regarding various improvements to the Airport- Pulling Road/Golden Gate Parkway intersection resulting from extensive study by staff and five professional consulting firms. All conclude that a grade separated overpass is the only alternative achieving an adequate level of service in 2025 while providing the most cost effective, long -term benefit to taxpayers. CONSIDERATION: Collier County is approaching the completion of a $1.8 million design effort that will substantially address existing transportations deficiencies at the intersection of Airport- Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway, and more importantly, accommodate transportation needs well into the future. This $1.8 million design cost does not include an additional $435,000 the County has already spent on supplemental studies, analysis and reports considering alternative improvements and impacts along the corridor. The design effort to date is in accordance with a decade of extensive planning and preparation by City and County officials. The project, a grade separated overpass, is one critical step in a series of improvements to occur along the Golden Gate Parkway corridor. Such improvements include the 6-Iane expansion currently under construction, the I -75 interchange to be completed in 2007, and the Goodlette -Frank Road improvements to begin early in 2005. In reviewing a decade of planning, this project is specifically called out within the HaIstatt (Grey Oaks, Estuary & Naples Grande) Development of Regional Impacts (DRI)/PUD, which was approved under an Interlocal Agreement between the City and the County in 1990. This development was required to reserve the rights -of —way for an overpass with Golden Gate Parkway to fly over Airport Road. An overpass was identified as a need in the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) Long Range Transportation Plan since 1993. The project was also identified in the County's Transportation 5 -Year Funded Work Program since 2001. In 2002, the County received notice that it was the recipient of $7.45 million in grant funding from the State of Florida (TOPS Grant) specifically for the proposed improvements to the Parkway which included an overpass to handle the traffic increase from the new I -75 interchange. As part of the overall corridor study, as well as concerns expressed by the City of Naples, the County advanced improvements to Goodlette -Frank Road in its 2002 update to the 5 -Year Transportation Work Program AQ EM No. I Em -- J A 1111 Y 2 .,2 J vr. To evaluate all conventional and unconventional alternatives to I� improve the intersection and corridor, the County has worked with five different professional consulting firms; and the City has worked with one firm. Kimley -Horn's first study looked at improvements to several intersections throughout the County and evaluated those intersections against several criteria including existing and future traffic conditions, activity centers, whether the roadways are evacuation routes, and parallel roadway options. The Grade Separation Study indicated that even with at -grade intersection improvements this intersection would fail from a level of service standpoint, which would cause a severe delay to the transportation system. Even if at -grade improvements were designed to include free flow rights and triple lefts along with six through lanes for each approach, the intersection still fails to operate at an acceptable level -of- service (LOS) in 2025. Additional analysis in the report was undertaken to estimate the user benefits of an Overpass at this location. It is estimated that over 550,000 hours of delay per year could be saved based on 2025 traffic conditions at a cost savings of $2.9 million. In addition the overpass is projected to reduce traffic crashes and save motorists approximately $130,000 per year. Subsequent to Kimley -Horn's study of conventional, at -grade improvements, Kimley Horn prepared a Technical Memorandum in 2001, which reviewed the types of overpass structures that could operate most efficiently and at the greatest level of safety. Structures that were considered include diamond, cloverleaf, trumpet and single point urban interchanges (SPUI). In summary, Kimley -Horn states, "the combination of relatively high capacity and low right -of -way costs makes the SPUI an ideal candidate for urban arterials". The need for a grade separated overpass at Airport Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway was further evaluated under a contract with RWA Consultants who were tasked with the refinement of design traffic movements to develop an overpass concept within reserved rights -of -ways. RWA was also charged with coordinating` public involvement activities to develop a concept that would be � Parkway consistent with the expectations of quality as characterized by ;; n nkdng the community. County staff and RWA met with the Board of 3063 County Commissioners (BCC), the Naples City Council on February 6, 2002, Bear's Paw on April 41. 2002 and held Countywide public meetings on February 11, 2002 and March 4, 2002 to present the conceptual plan and gain input into the design of this project. This concept plan was finalized in February of 2002 and it included almost $4 million in architectural and landscaping features to establish a more human scale to the structure and to serve as the gateway into the City of Naples. On May 14 2002 County staff received0" authorization from the BCC to begin design and engineering with RWA based on the work accomplished through the conceptual design study. 1 6 a In late 2002, the City of Naples asked Kimley -Horn to look at the traffic impacts associated with the future interchange and overpass. This study was undertaken to determine the traffic conditions at the intersections of Airport Pulling Road and Goodlette Frank Road. The results again indicated that the intersection at Airport Pulling Road fails in 2025 during both AM and PM peak hour conditions even with the best conventional at -grade solutions. With an overpass, the intersection would operate at an acceptable LOS for peak hour conditions in 2025. Kimley -Horn also determined that the intersection at Goodlette Frank Road is projected to fail for both the AM and PM peak hours with at- grade improvements within the existing right -of -way in 2025. It should also be noted that the intersection operates at a LOS F for the peak how conditions today in this analysis and is projected to fail with or without the overpass at Airport- Pulling Road. At the January 7, 2003 City/County joint workshop, Kimley -Horn confirmed the need for an overpass at Airport- Pulling Road and concluded the need for an overpass at Goodlette -Frank Road. However, they assumed that they would have to stay within the current ROW. County staff stated that because the primary movements are turning movements (unlike Golden Gate Pkwy. at Airport) the intersection should be able to be addressed with at -grade improvements. Subsequently, the County and City have been cooperatively working with American Consulting Engineers (ACE) to design improvements to the intersection at Goodlette -Frank Road (as well as that segment of Goodlette -Frank Road between the Parkway and Pine Ridge Road). The current design creatively calls for improvements that bypass westbound right turns outside the existing right -of -way. The design is quickly approaching 30% complete and will provide for an acceptable level of service today and through 2025. Kimley -Horn's study utilized the MPO's 2025 traffic model, which includes two Gordon River Bridges. Subsequent to the City /County workshop, Kimley -Horn was asked by the City to remove the bridges from the model and determine the impacts along the corridor. Kimley -Horn concluded that without the bridges, delay and extended queue lengths already experienced along the corridor would increase considerably. At a City Council Meeting, these results were discussed and concerns were raised with the Overpass. Later, in response to issues raised by the City at an WO meeting about the beneficial impacts of building one or two additional bridge crossings across the Gordon River, the County hired the TBE Group to prepare a detailed analysis of the costs and traffic impacts of additional bridges, particularly as they provide relief to Golden Gate Parkway. In building two bridges, different scenarios were developed to maximize diversion from Golden Gate Parkway. In summary, the cost to establish a single bridge crossing is estimated at $75 million. The cost to establish two bridge crossings is estimated at $90 million. These estimates are attributed to the acquisition of right -of -way, design, engineering, construction, and inspection associated with the proposed bridges and roads leading to the bridges. TBE concluded that the bridges would improve the operation of the network, with primary relief to Radio Road and Davis Boulevard rather than Golden Gate Parkway. Cwim Rl v ■ AOys AA"- dA-11* Rq.- No. �� c. MAL REPORT a... V In November 2003, the County contracted with Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas (Parsons), a transportation firm identified by the City as uniquely qualified in evaluating unconventional intersection designs. Parsons visited the area and reviewed prior studies and data. They quickly discounted previously considered unconventional approaches such as round -a- bouts, jug - handles, continuous flow intersections and quadrant roadways because of the volume of traffic seen at this intersection and right -of -way constraints. Parsons found that only grade separation would meet the 20 -year design needs (see Figure 1 below). However, Parsons did recommend a split intersection / median u -turn concept as a possible interim solution (see Figure 2 attached). Parsons proposed that this unconventional concept could likely fit within the dedicated right -of -way for an ultimate overpass. Parson also estimates that grade separation would be needed between 2010 and 2015; the earlier date likely if the corridor experiences a 2% a year growth rate which Parsons raised as a likely probability based on historical growth along the corridor. They noted that a split intersection design has been used as a temporary measure during interchange construction in the U. S., but lrl l: 2025 votame -to-ca d Aa alysisResWts there is presently no known longstanding 2M PM INTERSECTION DESIGN voiume-to- specific application. In whichever year Capacity Ratio grade separation becomes necessary, it is convwtioew hams fHM 1.42 estimated :that $3.5 minion worth -of' Median it -Tarn «ossov on GGp 121 construction associated with the contiauoas Flow;ntawction . 1.05 unconventional design would be disrupted SPW Ins with median =nLyas 1.11 and/or removed as 'part of an overpass v� Ratio above To = and 1 volume time construction. The unconventional nature of such a design requires significant driver acclamation, education and special law enforcement. Lastly, the - County has been woddng with Post Buckley Shuh and Jernigan (PBS &J), another leading transportation consulting firm, to evaluate future traffic conditions along Golden Gate Parkway from Santa Barbara Boulevard to U.S. 41. Two specific assignments were given. The first included the evaluation of different build scenarios for the Golden Gate Parkway intersections with Goodlette -Frank Road and Airport- Pulling Road in 2005 and 2025. The second assignment focused on the evaluation of different traffic scenarios due to the implementation of a second Gordon River bridge crossing. PBS&J's results are best-sununarized in Tables 1 and 2. Findings from the first assignment as depicted in Table 1 revealed the following: Operations at US 41 and at Santa Barbara Boulevard are relatively unaffected by the specific improvement decision at the Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway intersection or by the possible addition of two Gordon River Bridges The addition if two Gordon River Bridges will slightly reduce delay at Goodlette Frank Road, but add more delay at Livingston Road regardless of the specific provernent— decision at the Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway intersection ,t, JAN! 4 3—A • Given that all Airport Road at Golden Gate Parkway intersection alternatives, when optimized, do not significantly impact other intersections along the corridor, Table I below provides the best tool to evaluate the corridor operations and cost of the Airport Road at Golden Gate Parkway improvement options. • An overpass at Airport- Pulling Road provides significant benefit to the operation of the intersection well into the future; • Alternative improvements, such as a westbound bypass, at the intersection of Goodlette- Frank Road significantly improve the operation of the intersection. • In 2005, the signalized intersections within the study corridor are expected to operate better than a LOS `D', with the proposed improvements; In 2025, the following intersections along the Parkway are expected to operate below LOS `D' with the proposed improvements: Goodlette- Frank, Livingston, Santa Barbara (which is policy constrained). However, only Santa Barbara will operate below a LOS E (the county's minimum standard) for portions of the day. Findings from the second assignment as depicted in Table 2 revealed that an overpass at Airport- Pulling Road, along with a second Gordon River bridge crossing, provides the greatest savings in travel time, delay and fuel consumption along the Parkway corridor when compared to all other alternatives. The alternative of best conventional at -grade improvements, without a second Gordon River bridge crossing, is used as the baseline by which other alternatives are gauged. The baseline alternative has a cost of approximately $12 million. Other alternatives that were considered include: 1. An overpass without additional Gordon River bridge crossings; 2. At -grade improvements at Airport- Pulling Road with two Gordon River bridge crossings; 3. An overpass with two Gordon River bridge crossings; 4. Split intersection / median U -tum concept without additional Gordon River bridge crossings; 5. Split intersection / median U -turn concept with two Gordon River bridge crossings. The PBS&J findings confirm the results of all prior studies that the only conventional or unconventional improvement that meets the needs in 2025 is grade separation. Their analysis showed that the overpass does not adversely impact the other intersections along the corridor and that the overpass, even without two new bridges, provides for nearly a 20% reduction in travel time over the entire corridor. Even with 4 -lanes on a north Gordon River bridge crossing and 2 -lanes on a south bridge crossing, the addition of two new bridges does not provide sufficient relief to Golden Gate Parkway traffic to eliminate the need for grade separation. Lastly, they found that the split intersection with median u -turns would initially provide better operations than at -grade conventional improvements, but would actually operate less effectively than conventional at -grade intersection improvements in 2025. Neither the split intersection nor the conventional at-gradl impr even when combined with the additional bridges, would meet the 2025 traffic at an alcepUbLe LO 5 1 JAN 13; 2- �_; a4 FISCAL IMPACT: The Overpass is estimated to cost $27.2 million, which is to be funded by Gas Taxes, Impact Fees and a portion of the TOPS grant. GROWTH MANAGEMENT: The design, construction, and all- inclusive detail analysis of a grade separated overpass is consistent with the Growth Management Plan and the MPO's Cost Feasible Plan. RECOMMENDATION: To recognize that an exhaustive analysis of all conventional and unconventional improvements concludes that a grade separated overpass is the only alternative achieving an adequate level of service in 2025. Secondly, to recognize that implementation of a split intersection with median u -turns would only address deficiencies for a short duration even if additional bridges were conshvcted and, therefore, constriction of an overpass at the outset would deliver the most cost effective solution meeting the long -term needs of the entire county with the least construction disruption - And lastly to recognize that the current overpass design includes $4 million in aesthetic enhancements to maintain community character. Prepared by: Pate_ A�_1LL— L JAN { J L i34 -Pg. Gregg R. Strakaluse, Y.E. Director, Engineering & Construction Management Reviewed by: Date: Don Scott, AICP Director, Transportation Planning Reviewed and Approved by: Date: Norman Feder, AICP Transportation Administrator CI No. E Pg. JA N t J 2 " "1;4 J aaaa >t A A A A A A C < C C C A A A A A Cn? W N!7.- 0 W rA A. tot NA3 TS. R. tsO'GSN :3 rA � 0 rs o� a'6M� . . ' CD O :s' ►e A A C P) 0 A r� rk y p A o A to y C1 00 y IV N y y cr* 0 of �e c wa M 00 0 fn C) :3 R p cp N Uy c CD K O U2 W 9 U S c " QQ1 0 � M � A A A H a� F$ os a� 0 0 p. S 0 a 8 G a a_ E'r 0 J N .,y V M ca El V., I�� f�+ t9 O f9 A H � l/ rA � O r� tI� O W CA No. AV ) JAN 1 J Z 24 °r, 3 r7�o_� tz >n Poo �y fn � so p.. O CA 1"f' Cr a 00 J J 0�1 � figs O O t 00 — a r e'P t7l til d W 00 J Ol A ... 00 w ON CN 00 ► + 00 ry ■t M m %0 b U t0 >b a w w c co n 0 gt � �..f N U 00 J to -Pa ��y7 00 00 %O N tb O� to 1O 00 :3 '=f tri tri C �, W p � a� 91 tV O to r-+ 00 "i A r 171 tsl M 00 tJi� N t40,i� tiJ W � J r-• .� R .a r ►� d d o u f�+ t9 O f9 A H � l/ rA � O r� tI� O W CA No. AV ) JAN 1 J Z 24 °r, 3 r7�o_� 00 D D D D ➢ G) 0 3 m 3 m 3 m 3 m m Q rn CD i m cl > > @ m @ Dm n D W D m m 3 m mo 0 0 m v 90 .• =3 go = o = N o = to D C N Z 9 90 W O N W (Q OZ CO (D Q a to W O (@p H a 03 a y �A? ' N ym� W VN� ' cpVN 0 C < 0) b6 O*, � N> OD N C) CA A , cp(Oj�O @ CD @ o(p_a o �� o p) p o0A o W V N N 00 4 _W O aC7� GJ _� N O WO N 00 co A3 N -41,10 ND p m p� A(Yo O�vW OOCYR 00cn NW N @`G o O W o (r OD o A tD o �1 Q) o OD (n -0 @ m co _ � V JA � A y�6 O =a C I O CD (p o (D oV�O o V10 o N W o W N '1 m��m -1 ."TJ m0-�i -� �1 -� mC0C�� m�-��° CC-wlo E9 N3 @ 'O" y 0 0 W 0 N 0 N V w Pb G1 pp m O n0 0 0 0 O 0 m.�-�r f-w m� z � m� z�o C1 �/► f/r O _ N'' 4A -A O = O O Q (A C» C1D @ j► A �► A iA O -i 00 V 00 -1 m� m� o 0 mV <o 101 z zn '03 d! W W A dl W W A m d► ~ 4,19 ((D .N. O low, O Gw O '= 0 OD C) m r � N m m m 4 m a c O p O m m O 3 00 W fro. n�-7 4� EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF BUDGETED FUNDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BEST FRIEND PARK Objective: To develop the intended neighborhood park on county -owned land in Naples Park. Considerations: In September of 2001 members of the Naples Park community sought a neighborhood park of the Board of County Commissioners. The Board authorized purchase of land for this purpose as part of the FY 01 -02 budget process. In December of 2001 the County purchased two lots on 104th Street for a neighborhood park. In March of 2002 Naples Park community members sought a second neighborhood park through the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. PARAB members scored and ranked three neighborhood park applications and awarded two, one of which was to Naples Park. At that time the representatives of Naples Park preferred to put the development of the first park on hold, in favor of purchasing land for a second park while affordable parcels were still available. Funds in the amount of $165,000 were budgeted for the purchase of land for a second park for FY 02 -03. Over the course of the following year Parks and Recreation staff worked with neighborhood representatives, but a suitable second park site priced within budget was not to be had. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommends using the budgeted $165,000 for development of the first park. (The park was named Best Friend Park by North Naples community elementary school children enrolled in the after school program at Veterans Community Park. The children submitted name suggestions, then voted on a short list of their favorites.) Park development will proceed according to the neighborhood park policy and under the guidance of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and a Neighborhood Park committee composed of citizens from the Naples Park community. If the Naples Park community should desire a second park in the future, members may complete the application process according to policy at that time. Fiscal Impact: Funds are budgeted in Parks Capital Improvements (306), in the Naples Park Neighborhood Park project (80608). Source of funds is ad valorem taxes. Growth Management Impact: Neighborhood parks are not inventoried in the Growth Management Plan. Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners authorizes the use of budgeted funds to develop Best fAend P in Naples Park. /" Submitted by: 7Cm-arida O. Townsefid, Operations Parks and Recreation Department Date: ator Age No . I„' n��' JAN 1 3 7004 Pg.___� Reviewed by: Approved by: /10-. Nlarla O. Ramsey, Dire PadR and Recreatio e artment Johunnuck, Administrator Div ion of Public Services Date: Date: % No._- _� JAN 13 2004 pg. G, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OFOAFS THE�INT PARCEL ERSECTION OFD GOODLETTE- THE NORTHEAST QUANDRAN FRANK ROAD AND GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FOR DRAINAGE PPROTECTION. (FISCAL IMPACT: UP IMPROVEMENTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL TO $20,000,000.) OBJECTIVE: To provide for regional drainage improvements, roadway intersection improvements and for the protection of environmentally sensitive lands through the purchase of vacant property located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Goodlette -Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway. CONSIDERATION: A description of the property and its potential uses is reprinted below from the executive summary presented to the Board on December 16, 2003. A relatively unique parcel of land is being offered for sale within the County's Urban Area. Situated in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Goodlette -Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway, all within the boundaries of the City of Naples (see attached map), the property is 49.81 acres in size (according to the records of the Collier County Property Appraiser). The western portion of the property (nearly half of the entire parcel) is zoned "HC" (Highway Commercial) and according to some sources could be approved for the construction of over 300,000 square feet of retail commercial and/or office space. The eastern portion of the property, which borders on the headwaters of the Gordon River, is zoned "R 3 -12" (Medium Density Residential), and could be approved for the construction of up to 12 dwelling units per acre. Title to this vacant parcel of land is held primarily within the estate of Dorette K. Fleischmann. The property also contains approximately 13 acres of wetlands located along the eastern (Gordon River) boundary, 7.5 acres of which have previously been targeted as a conservation area. It is primarily for this reason that the property (or at least the wetlands portion) has attracted the attention of the Conservation Collier program. Other public uses of the property (aside from natural resource conservation) include stormwater retention and treatment with the Gordon River Basin area, and road right -of -way for the construction of capacity improvements at the intersection of Goodlette -Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway. One possible scenario involves the construction of westbound -to- northbound turn lanes along the rear of the bowling alley and the bank property. (Removing the right turn lanes from the intersection itself might improve through movements and increase overall capacity.) The turn lanes would require an estimated 1.43 acres, and would sever an additional 1.88 acres from the parent tract (that small triangular portion of the property located north of the Parkway and immediately to the east of the bowling alley, and that portion of the property currently encumbered by the Florida Power and Light Company electrical transmission lines, immediately to the north of the bowling alley and the bank). Another scenario for public use of the property involves the construction of a large holding pond for the slow release of fresh water into Naples Bay. The close proximity of the Gordon River and Naples Bay to the subject neighborhood, which has an elevation which is nearly at sea level already, makes the acquisition of the Fleischmann property for stormwater retention an appealing eonsid q�� (JE No. JAN 13 2004 Page 2 of 3 w While the property is currently listed for sale at $20,300,000; the County's purchase offer for the property is $19,125,000 (which is the average of the two (2) independent real estate appraisals of the subject property, which were obtained in accordance with the provisions of Section 125.355, F.S.) The appraisal of the property developed by William H. Reeve, III, MAI, SRA, estimates the market value of the property at $19,500,000. The appraisal of the property developed by Dan K. Richardson, PhD, MAI, AICP, estimates the value of the property to be $18,750,000. r FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact assumes a purchase price for the property of $19,125,000 acquisition cost for this property, plus title insurance at $45,500, for a total cost of $19,170,500. Of this amount, $2,700,000 is road impact fee eligible leaving a remaining balance of $16,470,500. A Commercial Paper (5 year) loan is recommended as the interim financing mechanism for this purchase. Assuming a 5% interest rate, the annual debt service ranges from $4.4 million to $3.7 million in the final year. Interest is payable monthly on Commercial Paper loans. Annualized interest at 5% amounts to $823,525 annually; assuming interest payments began in January (9 months of County fiscal year 2004) the interest required in FY 04 amounts to approximately $617,644. Funds are available in General Fund reserves for the interest payment in FY 04. Future debt service payments would be budgeted in the General Fund. County staff will be aggressively pursuing cost sharing with the following entities: Conservation Collier, the City of Naples, and the South Florida Water Management District. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The purchase of this property is consistent with the County's Capital Improvement Element, Conservation Collier Program and Stormwater Management goals. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Approve the purchase of the subject property at the purchase price of $19,125,000, plus title insurance at a cost of $45,500; 2. Authorize its Chairman to execute an Agreement for Sale and Purchase at said purchase price; 3. Accept the conveyance of the subject property by warranty deed, and authorize staff to record same in the public records; and 4. Fund the transaction, including the purchase of title insurance, through the approval of whatever budget amendments may be required. SUBMITTED BY: I6aZ� uisition Manager Transportation Engineering and Construction Management Department JAN 13 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD CONSIDER AND REJECT AQUAPORT PLAINTIFFS' ATTEMPT TO ALTER TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN AQUAPORT PLAINTIFFS AND INDIVIDUAL COMMISSIONER DEFENDANTS AFTER THE FACT, AT LEAST TO THE EXTENT COUNTY FUNDS ARE AT ISSUE. OBJECTIVE: For the Board to consider and reject the attempt by Aquaport plaintiffs to alter the terms of the settlement agreement between the Aquaport plaintiffs and individual commissioner defendants after the fact, at least to the extent County funds are at issue, in Case Nos. 03- 13133 -BBB (appellate court number) and 2:01-CV- 341 -FTM- 29DNF (trial court number). CONSIDERATIONS: On October 28, 2003, the Board agreed to waive any claim for attorneys-' fees and costs in Case Nos. 03- 13133 -BBB and 2:01 -CV- 341- FTM- 29DNF, styled Aquaport v. Collier County, in exchange for dismissal with prejudice of all claims against the individual commissioner defendants. The acceptance of the Aquaport plaintiffs' offer by the Board was promptly communicated to the attorney for the individual commissioner defendants, who notified the attorney for the Aquaport plaintiffs on or around October 29, 2003 of the Board's decision. The individual defendants also agreed to the settlement. Thereafter, settlement documents were prepared and circulated among counsel. Rather than notifying the Court of Appeals that the case involving the individual commissioner defendants had been settled and that an extension of time would be needed to finalize settlement documents, the Aquaport plaintiffs' attorney went forward and allegedly prepared certain responses in the litigation and now claims that delay in signing the settlement documents (the documents were signed by all necessary attorneys and returned on November 24, 2003) resulted in alleged additional unnecessary expenses to the Aquaport plaintiffs. Thus, the Aquaport plaintiffs now seek $10,000.00 in compensation in addition to the waiver of the County's and individual commissioner defendants claim for attorneys' fees and costs. Based upon the facts known at this time, it is the position of the Office of the County Attorney that the Aquaport plaintiffs are simply reneging upon the settlement agreement. Further, counsel for the individual commissioner defendants has filed a motion in federal court to enforce the settlement agreement. In an effort to bring this matter to a close, the excess insurance carrier for the County has agreed to offer $2,500.00 to the Aquaport plaintiffs. This would not be County money but would come directly from the insurance carrier. It is unknown whether the insurance carrier's proposal will be accepted. FISCAL IMPACT: If the County refuses to pay any County funds to the Aquaport plaintiffs and the court overrules the motion to enforce the settlement, the only potential fiscal impact to the County would arise if the Aquaport plaintiffs are succe Is u'1^4' l N0. JAN 13 2004 1 Pg. in reversing the trial court's judgment in favor of the individual commissioner defendants and then are ultimately successful in the litigation in obtaining a judgment in excess of insurance coverage. This would require that the Aquaport plaintiffs obtain a judgment against the individual commissioner defendants and the County collectively in excess of approximately 4 million dollars. While there certainly can be no guarantees, such a result appears unlikely in view of the current posture of the case, especially with respect to the individual commissioner defendants who have advanced a strong qualified immunity defense in addition to the fact that the Aquaport plaintiffs' claims against those individual commissioner defendants were found to be without merit by the trial court. Nevertheless, the Board needs to recognize that by acceding to the Aquaport plaintiffs and insurance carrier's offer, it could absolutely prevent any risk of a judgment involving the individual commissioner defendants in excess of insurance coverage. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated with this Executive Summary. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board consider and reject the attempt by the Aquaport plaintiffs to alter the settlement agreement of October 28, 2003, at least to the extent County funds are at issue, and to direct the Office of the County Attorney to communicate that decision to counsel for the individual commissioner defendants. PREPARED Michael W. Pettit Chief Assistant County Attorney REVIEWED BY David C. Weigel, County At ey 2 DATE: 11,1,12-101,- ,` 2— v DATE: f a, AGEND tTE,M N0. JAN 13 2004 pg. __Q_ Page 3 of 3 REVIEWED BY: _ Date: 7 d 'A Gregg R. Strakaluse, P.E., Director Transportati Engineering and Construction Management Department APPROVED BY: ,c,�,..— _ Date: Norman eder, Al P, Administrator Transp ation Services Division JAN 13 .-,j EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — REQUEST TO GRANT FINAL APPROVAL OF THE ROADWAY (PRIVATE), DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF "HABITAT VILLAGE THE THE WATER AND DRAINAGE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED, SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED BY COLLIER COUNTY OBJECTIVE: To grant final approval of the with that subdivision known as CONSIDERATIONS: 1. On June 26, 2002, the preliminary acceptance sewer improvements in "1-� ,— infrastructure improvements associated "Habitat Village" Board of County Commissioners granted of the roadway, drainage, water and iabitat Village ". 2. The roadway and drainage improvements will be maintained by the project's homeowner's association. The water and sewer improvements will be maintained by the County. 3. The required improvements have been constructed in accordance with the Land Development Code. The County Development Services has inspected the improvements and is recommending final acceptance of the improvements. 4.A resolution for final acceptance has been prepared and approved by the County Attorney's Office. A copy of the document is attached. 5. This Executive Summary has been reviewed and approved by Transportation Services and Public works Utilities. FISCAL IMPACT: The roadway and drainage improvements will be maintained by the project's homeowners association. Water and sewer improvements will be maintained by the County's Utility Department through their operation and maintenance budget. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact. JAN 13 2004 Executive Summary Habitat Village Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: of That the Board of County waterCommissioners and osewer grant improvements cinptHabitat the roadway, drainage, Village" and release the maintenance security. 1. Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached resolution authorizing final acceptance. 2. Authorize the release of the maintenance security. PREPARED BY: AID John R. Houldsworth, Engineering Review REVIEWED MY: Senior Engineer Thomas'7t, Kuck, P.E. Engineering Review Director / County Engineer APPROVED BY: Joyp7hK�Schditf, Admifiistrator CoDev. and Environmental Svcs . Date Z�� Date Za 0 D to NO, 1( JAN 13 2004 Pt•.....° ---- W i- CO 0 Z O Q U O J RESOLUTION NO. 04- RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TO AUTHORIZE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN HABITAT VILLAGE, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, AND WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HABITAT VILLAGE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on September 25, 2001 approved the plat of Habitat Village for recording; and WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91 -102, as amended), and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 01 -57); and WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and RiIEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements, and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance is hereby granted for those roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements in Habitat Village , and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for roadway, drainage, and water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the Habitat Village Homeowner's Association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same, this day of 2004. DATE: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: n Q Patrick G. White Ok Assistant Collier County Attorney JAN 13 2004 Pg._ 11-- CRA AGENDA ITEM COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE THE CHANGE O XPENDITURES RELATED TO AP PROVED OUT OF THE BAYSHORE AP CHRISTMAS WALK ART FESTIVAL. OBJECTIVE: To approve the change of the designated payee for previously approved out of pocket expenditures related to the Bayshore Christmas Walk Art Festival. CONSIDERATIONS: On November 4, 2003 the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle CRA Advisory Board unaniously approved the allocation of $2,000 for the expenditure of monies from Fund 187 - Bayshore /Gateway Triangle for expenses related to the Bayshore Christmas Walk Art Festival. On November 14, 2003 the CRA Board approved the Advisory Board's recommendation, but added that the funds must be reimbursed to an individual. The individual named at the meeting was Nancy Hannigan of the Bayshore Arts Association. Due to fiscal constraints Ms. Hannigan was unable to front all monies needed for the event. Ms. Donna Fiala, Bayshore Arts Association Member, made the decision to pay for the expenses related to the Bayshore Christmas Walk Art Festival in the absense of Ms. Hannigan. Due to this event the designated payee for previously approved out of pocket expenditures related to the Bayshore Christmas Walk Art Festival needs to be changed from Nancy Hannigan to Donna Fiala. FISCAL IMPACT: The $2,000 of accrued tax increment revenue will be used for expenses related to the Bayshore Christmas Walk Art Festival such as, for decorations, publicizing, and policing. Funds will be taken from Fund 187. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING RECOMMENDATION: To approve the change of the designated payee for previously approved out of pocket expenditures related to the Bayshore Christmas Walk Art Festival_ -1- INo.� JAN 13 2004 Pig r-- PREPARE D. AARO BLAIR, U AN DESIGN PLANNER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: RANDY COHEN, MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY_ STAN LITSINGER, AICP DIRECTOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY: 2.4 DAT DATE DATE Z /.•2 ?/a J PH K. SCHMITT DATE A INISTRATOR C MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES JAN 13 2004 -�- I Pg. a I.,-- Sheet 1 of 2 AVESMT2003- AR4693 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PETITION AVESMT2003- AR4693 TO VACATE, RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM THE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT OF WAY RECORDED BY SEPARATE LORIDA INSTRUMENT IN THE LOCATED IN SECTION COUNTY, FLORIDA. PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, F 35, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER OBJECTIVE: To adopt a Resolution to vacate, renounce and disclaim any rights acquired by the County and the Public in the above - described instrument which may have created a public road right of way. CONSIDERATIONS: Petition AVESMT2003- AR4693 has been received by the Engineering Services Department from Bob Thinnes, AICP, from Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., as agent for the petitioner, William L. Hoover, Trustee, requesting the vacation of the 30 foot wide road right of way as referred to in the Corrective Personal Representative's Deed recorded in Official Record Book 3275, Pages 2926 through 2927, Public records of Collier County, Florida. This 30 foot wide road right of way is described in the Deed as "... subject to an easement for public road right of way over and across the east 30 feet thereof." The Petitioner has not found evidence to show that Collier County has formally accepted this road right of way. A road has not been constructed within this right of way and there are no plans to use this right of way for a public road. Letters of No Objection have been received from the following Collier County Departments: Transportation, Engineering Services, Stormwater Management and Public Utilities. Letters of no objection have also been received from FPL, Sprint and Comcast. Zoning is PUD. A copy of this Executive Summary and the date of the County Commission Board Meeting were sent to Ed Kant in Transportation and to Jacquelyn Johnson in Public Utilities on December 18, 2003. FISCAL IMPACT: Engineering Services has collected a $1,000 "Petition to Vacate" fee from the petitioner, which covers the County's cost of recording and processing the Petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact associated with this Executive Summary. AUtJWOR No. JAN 13 2004 I--- Sheet 2 of 2 AVESMT2003- AR4693 ENGINEERING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Adopt the Resolution for Petition AVESMT2003- AR4693 to vacate the County's and the Public's interest in the 30 foot wide road right of way; and 2. Authorize the execution of the Resolution by its Chairman and direct the Clerk to the Board to record a certified copy of the Resolution in the Official Records. PREPARED BY: CZ, en. tG.. r,-- Rick Grigg, P.S.M. Engineering Services r REVIEWED BY: J,�� 9 DATE: Xf -40 Thomas E. Kuck, P.E. Engineering Services Director APPROVED BY DATE: Jo ph K. Schmitt, Administrator C mmunity Development &Environmental Services AGENDA ITEM Na�� JAN 13 2004 Pg._ RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR PETITION AVESMT2003- AR4693 TO VACATE, RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM THE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT OF WAY RECORDED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOCATED IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 125.01(t), Florida Statutes, Bob Thinnes, AICP, from Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., as agent for the petitioner, William L. Hoover, Trustee, does hereby request the Board of County Commissioners to vacate, renounce and disclaim the alleged easement for Public Road Right of Way set forth below over and across a portion of Section 35, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County-, and WHEREAS, the alleged easement for Public Road Right of Way appears in a Corrective Personal Representative's Deed recorded in Official Record Book 3275, Pages 2926 through 2927, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the granting of Petitioner's request will not adversely affect the ownership or right of convenient access of other property owners; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the County's easement interests, if any, over and across the 30 foot wide Public Road Right of Way more particularly described in the above referenced Corrective Personal Representative's Deed, incorporated as if set forth herein, is hereby vacated, extinguished, renounced and disclaimed and this action is declared to be in the Public's interest and will provide a Public benefit: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk to the Board is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida. This Resolution is adopted this day of , 2004, after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATED: ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman Approved as to form and legal - sufficiency: = Jennifer A. B edio, Esq. Assistant Co ty Attorney Page 1 of 1 JAN 13 2004 r, PETITION FORM FOR VACATION OF ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY RV 5MT 2003- Pi Z4Co9 3 Date Received: gLLS, Petition #: Petitioner: William L. Hoover, Trustee Address: 3785 N. Airport Road, Suite B Telephone:_ Y03 City/State: Naples, Florida Zip Code: 34105 Agent: 0. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Address: _3800 Via Del Rey Telephone: 239 -947 -1 144 City/State: Bonita Springs, FL Zip Code:-Bonita Springs, FL Road Name: Davila Street Location: Section 35 Township 48 Range 26 Plat Book Page(s) Legal Description: Please see attached legal description Current Zoning: PUD Reason for Request: Unimproved road serving no public benefit Does this affect density? No I hereby auut�thhorize Agent above to represent me for this petition: ® Yes El No /L % - 3 /,— 0 -� Signature of Petitioner Date William L. Hoover Trustee Print Name (Title) Please see "Policy and Procedure on the Closing and Vacation of Road Right -of -Way" for the list of supportive materials which must accompany this petition, and deliver or mail to: (1) (2) (3) (4) Community Development & Environmental Services Division Planning Services Department 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Florida 34104 If applicant is a land trust, indicate the name of beneficiaries. If applicant is a corporation other than a public corporation, indicate the name of officers and major stockholders. If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, indicate the name of principals. List all other owners. AGEwA ITEM Ido Attachment "A" Page 4 of 4 JAN 13 2004 P9 _L_— Official Receipt - Collier County Board of County Commissioners — CDPR1103 -official Receipt ns Number Date Post Date Pa ment Slip Nbr P428646 9/4/2003 12:33:56 PM 9/4/2003 AR 4693 Appl Name: Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOC., P.A. Appl Stage /Status: REVIEW STAGE NO. 1 /PENDING Address: 3800 VIA DEL REY BONITA SPRINGS FL 34134 Proj Name: BUCKS RUN Type: RMF TAZ: Subdiv Nbr: 100 Project Nbr: 19990120 Payor : BUCKS RUN LAND TRUST Fee Information Fee Code 12T C Description REV ACCT/ VAC EASEMENT -ROW �GL ccou nt 3832032910000000 T,,..,. Amount $1000.00 ti nnn nn Waived Payments Pa ment Code Account/Check Number Amount CHECK 465 $1000.00 Memo: Collier County Board of County Commissioners CD -Plus for Windows 95 /NT Total Cash Total Non -Cash Total Paid $0.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 Cashier/location: GARRETT_S / 1 User: SMITH_G JAN 13 2004 Retft: iiizioJ Ux: 3Z'I5 rv: ez6 COLLIER TITLB INSURANCE CO RICORDBD is the OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL BBC FBI 10.50 2335 N TANIANI TR 131N 0412912003 at 01:01AN DWIGHT 1. BROCI, CLERK DOC -.10 .10 NAPLIS FL 34103 CORRECTIVE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED Made this (q' 71- -day of April A.D., 2003 by JOHN J. MAURIEL, JR. , Individually and as Trustee of the amended and restated Mauriel Feit Land Trust dated December 31, 1974 and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rosemary Mauriel, deceased hereinafter called 'the grantor, to: WILLIAM L. HOOVER, Trustee of The Bucks Run Land Trust Dated the 27th day of July, 1999 with full power and authority either to protect, conserve and to sell or to lease, or to encumber or to otherwise manage and dispose of real property herein described, pursuant to the provisions of F.S. 689.071. whose post office address is 3785 N. Airport Road, Suite B Naples, FL 34105 Social Security Number(s): hereinafter called the grantee; VdTNESSETH, that the grantor, for and in the consideration of the sum of 510.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, grants and conveys to grantee that real property located in the County of Collier, State of Florida, viz: See Attached Schedule A for Correct Legal Description. This is not the Grantors Homestead, nor contiguous thereto. This corrective Deed is being recorded to correct the legal description. SUBJECT to Easements, Restrictions and Reservations of Record. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. AND the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 1999. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and d 'vered in our presence: Witness Signature JOI& ttKIAVRIEL, ndividuali and as Trustee of the amended and restated Mauriel Felt w Land Trust dated 12/31/74 and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rosemary Mauriel, PrindWitness Name Deceased Witness Signature CGer,e Oujr_z y n sk� — Print Witness Name (o State of Minnesota JAN 13 2004 County of Hennepin j The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 18� day of April , 2003 , by PQ. JOHN J. MAURIEL JR., Individ.ually. and as Trustee. of the amended and restated Mauriel Felt Land dated December 31, 1974 and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rosemary Mauriel, deceased. who is personally known to me or has produced drivers licenses as id e tiGcation and did i of take oath. Not ry P 'c Print nam /S Prepared by and Return to: My commission expires: Collier Title Insurance Agency of Naples, Inc. 2335 N. Tamiami Trail, Suite 310 ( `S`sj MARY HELEN NELSON Naples, Florida 34103 S NOTARY 7UBUGMIMNElOTA File No: CTI- 1940 -99 Zyis t3;� MY COMMISSION EIlPIRES 1-71-1006 SCHEDULE A LEGAL DESCRIPTION CTI- 1940 -99 * ** OR: 3275 PG: 2927 * ** THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 100 FEET THEREOF PREVIOUSLY CONVEYED FOR A ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT -OF -WAY. PARCEL I.D #00206200002 AND THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF,,�' SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY OVER AND ACROSS THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL I.D. #00206040000 �� 71 JAN 13 2004 PB. 2002 COLLIER COUNTY NOTICE OF AO VALOREM TAXES AND NON— AD, ;Y.ALO.RrM ASSESSMENTS:``• WISCOUNT EARNED 4X IN NOV 3 IN DEC 2% IN. JAN 1X IN"FEB OX, ITV s ARC AMOUNTI DUE 69237.07 6qp302eOjj 6.367.0 '.6,431.98 6,496.95 ; 'ASSESSED t 3. 119 C4� COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR I .. 4.,3490 2`124. Q CHO L S COURTHOUSE COMPLEX - BUILDING C -1 �. 2.5.62 Q l' 2 q�V S LOCA 1 : NAPLES, FLORIDA-34112 -4997 xTAXABLE 448r500 s�069 .1 DEPEN 10 :5265 2 I ..0268 1.3 9 WA P. P I INCOVER �TRs:, HIL4IAM_ =L P D 6 TF BUCKS RUN LAND'TRUST 13.2998 69'496.9 2fl TAD 7-27-99-. - 3785 AIRPORT PULLING RD N -9 8: "- NAPLES FL 34105 -4518 O COMM. MPRO COMM. IMPROVE. 4 GARBAGE k • 095 COMBINED TOTAL 5 48 26 N1 12 OF PAID — 03/28/03 69496.95 ill /4 LESS E 3flFT REC# 12i .fl' I A I I cm N0. !- JAN 13 2004 Pg. 59[99 (lS8 Hui --- —..-- sof99 )inosa. ot6oioa -pio jo ouols!4 6u!lou6!sap a»nos 61unoo _ -- ' -!Ilo a41 ajo sdom Rl!l!9o0oJd lov6oloao43iV /u!'ols!H 441 b3HIO Id a 33 as EE S ll Nl- M JAN 13 200 PQ. q f O N V o U W ct F Z I W J Z V M Ua Id a 33 as EE S ll Nl- M JAN 13 200 PQ. q f7.11 rL:. Iy. FlnridL COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION June 10, 2003 Mr. Bob Thinnes, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 -7569 SUBJECT: Parcel ID 00206200002, 00206040000 Letter of No Objection Dear Mr. Thinnes: 2685 SOUTH HORSESHOE DRIVE, SUITE 211 NAPLES, FL 34104 (239) 403 -2310 FAX: (239) 213 -5815 The Collier County Transportation Planning Department has reviewed your request to vacate the existing thirty (30) foot public road right -of -way along the eastern border of the above - identified parcel. After looking at the information you submitted, Transportation Planning Department has no objection to the vacation of the existing thirty (30) foot public road right -of -way as described in Exhibit "A" of the request by Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. Furthermore, please find attached letters of no objection from Transportation Engineering and Construction, Transportation Maintenance and Transportation Operations. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me. Sincerely, Alan S. El- Urfali, E.I., Senior Project Manager CC: Don Scott, A.I.C.P., Transportation Planning Director AGEMA ITEM JAN 13 2m Pg. /0 April 7, 2003 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY DEVEI.OPMENTAND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DMSION Engineering Services Department 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. • Naples, Florida 34104 • 239 -659 -5744 • Fax 239 -643 -6968 www.co.collier.tl.us Mr. Bob Thinnes, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, Inc. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL. 34134 Re: Letter of No Objection Right -of -way Easement Vacation Folio No. 00206040000 Dear Mr. Thinnes: We have reviewed the information submitted to us as justification for the above referenced request for a vacation of the referenced right -of -way easement, and have "no objection" to the proposed vacation. If you should ve an questions, please feel free to contact us at 403 -2471. John R. Ho wo Senior Engineer [AG:8NDA 11TEM C-- P PS 4. COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DIVISION 2685 Horseshoe Drive South , Suite 212 • Naples, Florida 34104 • 239--732-2501 • Fax 239- 659 -5790 ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ❖Right- of -Way Acquisition •:•StormwaterManagement •:•Design & Engineering •:-Construction Management April 9, 2003 Mr. Bob Thinnes, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 -7569 RE: Letter of No Objection Parcel ID 00206200002, 00206040000 Collier County Dear Mr. Thinnes: The Collier County Stormwater Management Section has reviewed your request to vacate the existing thirty (30) foot public road right -of -way along the eastern border of the above identified parcel. After looking at the information you submitted, and the inventory of the stormwater management canal system in the area, the Stormwater Management Section has no objection on the vacation of the existing thirty (30) foot public road right -of -way as described in Exhibit "A" of the request by Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. Please be advised that this letter addresses only the issue of current public stormwater management facilities and does not address any possible street or access requirements of the County or legal access requirements of adjacent parcels. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact my office. Sincerely, Xg� Robert C. Wi , P.E. Principal Project Manager cc: Mike Etelamaki, P.E., Director, Road Maintenance Department July C. Adarmes Minor, P.E., Senior Engineer, Stormwater Management Section Richard Grigg, P.L.S., Land Surveyor, Engineering Services Department Reading File Bob Thinnes Esmt Vac Ltr 01.doc AGENDA ITEM No., /h /q , �' , JAN 13 2004 Pg.-- LIA— June 30, 2003 COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES DMSION 3301 E. Tamiami Trail • Naples, Florida 34112 • (239) 732 -2575 • FAX (239) 732 -2526 Bob Thinnes Q. Grady Minor & Assoc. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 -7569 Re: 700' N of Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Ext. Easement Vacation Request Dear Mr. Thinnes: This office has reviewed your request to vacate a portion of the easement at the north -west boundary of the above - referenced lot. The Collier County Water -Sewer District has no facilities in the area and we therefore have no objection to the vacation of the easement. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at 732 -2571. Sincerely, Jacquelyn o son Engineering Technician cc: Paul Mattausch, Water Director Joseph Cheatham, Wastewater Director Rick Grigg, Land Surveyor, Community Development gAengineering tech \easMent- r. ©.w. N\'�00' ai of yanderkh beacibrd. ext..doc t Y JAN 13 2004 Pt•...... ..-` -- FPL an I-N C;mup mmpnny June 13, 2003 Q_ Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Ray Bonita Springs, Fl 34134 -7569 Attn: Bob Thi.nnes Dear Bob, Anne Harris Customer Project Designer 4105 15'b Ave SW Naples, FL 34116 239 -353 -6070 FAX 239 -353 -6082 Florida Power & Light has no objection to the vacation of the described road right way easement. Per our site meeting on Wednesday, June 11, 2003 the only thing to note if future facilities are necessary to provide service to this project it would be necessary for owner/builder to provide us with a utility easement. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. 4;,Y.I? - Anne Harris Power Systems Sprint April 24, 2003 Mr. Bob Thinnes, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 -7569 P. 0. Box 2469 Naples, FL 34106 -2469 RE: Petition to Vacate - A thirty foot.(30') Wide Road Right -of -Way Easement as Described in Exhibit "A ", Parcel ID 00206200002, 0020604000 Section 35 Township 48S Range 26E Collier County, Florida Dear Mr. Thinnes: Sprint- Florida, Inc. has no objection to your petition to vacate the easement as described in your letter dated March 28, 2003. If I can be of any further assistance, please contact me at (239) 263 -6318. Sincerely, i Ken Jordan Network Engineer I - E &C KRJ /jw Attach. cc: Easement File .SAN 13 2004 2931 Michigan Avenue Fort Myers, Florida 33916 Phone 941 -334 -8828 Fax 941 -334 -8575 Cc:lomcast April 1, 2003 Q. Grady Minor & Associates C/O Bob Thinnes 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34137 -7569 Re: Request for a Letter of Review and Recommendation on a Proposed Easement Vacation of the Following Location: Parcel ID 00206200002, 00206040000 Collier County Dear Bob Thinnes, Comcast has no facilities existing in the above referenced location and has no objection with the vacation of easement. If I can be of further assistance to you please do not hesitate to contact me at 239 - 732 -3865. VSincea Design Coordinatcr JAN 13 2004 PQ.� I A Coco P O' rw 1� >4 IMF u A W o4 20 a 353. _ - - - - -- � w Q- LL r W ; O LL w T _ 0 U. CID.. r Q m o cc U: w T 0 Z LL Q s co CIO M �yyO� cr T N v N Y „» LS g m 0 tV. G y CCU m Co 3 i9 NmE `: Q R m �Z m E.8 o v E a Z C 5c > c� vZ T J (n 'pt.W --- Q 00� �5s boaaen��noa din -ioo CN , k�3.7:30 8 m AMEND N0. JAN 13 2004 Pg•_l -- a` i � . ? 3 ?a. { "'� >'� 9b? EA 5� Fe., � � �. fi?*��,q�y � .�:..x ,¢yj'�.q , �,ql � A.� '$.i 3 i, i �.sj� (' t *�€ SkTi� ~ �� K �°� -veg r F` ,a. '. � .. T�J} f'��` '� �.P"�'�i�' � �4 -- 4: 'aG�i ,Bf �8 5}3 'd '`� ,A• ,!� .. - ._.E!. „� a�-. ... ..,. _ .iv �� : YE'� � i � a < <' �t � �, .. Y y „m �••� l r w ,d- � �� 4��1' G - � .e (�+ � Yp �' ® 8� � :� ' -- __ �� ,k ' • �, oa � ,may ', � ya � Y � ' .., F.s M1� .. X � � - , k �� -� � _ �� - � ”- i i i - .'y r .. f I� � • � � _�..s�.. ( \fr is � ... " ! ,� + °�?{ � � 43 ' f �, ..,, ;� �� 4. � � -- ��-` ;� , -•- ch � � ,� �°� "' � �—,� � � � � �� r w x�, � �� .� �,- - _., _ — "+a _. — — - - - -_ _ —_ _ -�.. —t . -" :7 E �. >�, ��'°°.....e,. �. _ � -� � �� -- �i� � " � L � � � � �� _y fi` S � �. STATEMENT OF VACATION The requested vacation of Davila Street is an unimproved, thirty foot wide easement that provides no connection to Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. The benefit to the general public is the elimination of a road right -of -way that is not available for public use, provides no transportation benefit and eliminates the costs for future design, construction and maintenance. f4m Z — JAN 13 2004 F:VOB \BUCKS- RUN\BT\STATEMENT OF VACATION.doc - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PETITION CARNY- 2003 -AR -5175, JOHN YONKOSKY, TREASURER, COLLIER COUNTY FAIR AND EXPOSITION, INC., REQUESTING A PERMIT TO CONDUCT A FAIR FROM JANUARY 30th THROUGH FEBRUARY 8th, 2004, AT THE COLLIER COUNTY FAIR GROUNDS ON IMMOKALEE ROAD (C.R. 846) NORTH GOLDEN GATE ESTATES. OBJECTIVE: To provide local entertainment and education experiences to residents and visitors of Collier County. John Yonkosky, Treasurer, Collier County Fair and Exposition, Inc., is requesting that the Board of County Commissioners approve a permit to conduct the annual Collier County fair from January 30th through February 8th, 2004, on County owned property located on Immokalee Road (C.R. 846) North Golden Gate Estates. The applicant is also requesting waivers of the occupational license and the surety bond. CONSIDERATIONS: John Yonkosky, Treasurer, Collier County Fair and Exposition, Inc., made application to the Board of County Commissioners for a permit to conduct their annual fair. Collier County Fair and Exposition, Inc., has presented evidence that all the criteria have been met for the issuance of this permit. Staff supports the waiver of the Surety Bond as there have been no previous problems related to clean up of the site after the County fair. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact. ,r— RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the permit to conduct the annual Collier County Fair and waive the occupational license and surety bond. PREPARED BY SAN HURRAY, AICP DATE INTERIM DIRECTOR DEPT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEWED BY: 0 SAN MURRAY, AICP DATE INTERIM DIRECTOR DEPT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: PH K. SCHMITT, ADMINISTRATOR MUNITY DEV. AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS. 0 q �3 TE JAN 13 2004 pg.. I 28th Annual Collier County Agricultural Fair & Exposition, Inc. Fair January 30'h— February 8"', 2004 Collier County Fairgrounds Hwy 846, North Golden Gate Naples, FL JAN 13 2004 pg. a THE COLLIER COUNTY AGRICULTURAL FAIR and EXPOSITION, INC. December 15, 2003 Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34103 Attention: Ms. Susan Murray Re: Request for County Fair Permit Dear Ms. Murray, Collier County Fair 751 39th Avenue N.E. Naples, FL 34120 (239) 455 -1444 Fax: (239) 455 -6701 In accordance with the provisions of Collier County Ordinance No. 75 -11, we respectfully submit the following information and exhibits witnessing to our compliance to those requirements and our evidence of such, in the form of a petition to obtain the subject permit. A. 1. Logo 2. Sketch of site showing basic location of activities 3. Board of Directors 4. Evidence of public liability insurance 5. Activity description 6. Letter confirming refuse service 7. Letter for private port-a -let use 8. Letter confirming security from Sheriff 9. Letter confirming emergency services 10. Letter confirming fire safety 11. Land Lease authorizing use of property located on Highway 846, North Golden G 12. State Permit AGENDA n r 13. Tax Exempt sheet --.L. A JAN 13 2004 t pg. 3 B. Waiver of Requirements We are requesting the Board of Collier County Commissioners to waive the following requirements of Ordinance No. 75 -11 as you have in the past, because the Fair Association falls under the classification of a non - profit organization. 1. Section 1 item 3.a, Surety Bond 2. Section 1 item 34 Occupational License In review of the request, should any questions arise, please do not hesitate to contact Ann Ward, Fair Manager at 455 - 1444. Sinc ely, Jo Yonkosky, reasurer Collier County Agricultural Fair and Exposition, Inc. Enclosures AGENDA ITEM J No. /45' � i "1 JAN 13 2004 Pa•� 2 NOTE:: Please 'read reverse side Copy: Zoning Director ,,- before completing this Copy: Petitioner Petition. Copy: (4) County Manager Original Form: 11/4/75 CARNIVAL OPERATION_ PETITION PETITION NO.- DATE : `''l I 1 I Q PETITIONER'S NAME:00I it e , • % . e--, no— PETITIONER'S ADDRESS: '�` Ayr. E. -TELEPHONE: PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: a eASQ_ GENERAL LOCATION: S- Lo 1,10(4h G o lcicn qdLtr_ CURRENT ZONING: CURRENT USE: NATURE OF PETITION : G� j::hj'1C> `pp .201 O0yG60 7 THE FOLLOWING. INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN THIS PETITION. (FOR EXPLANATION, SEE REVERSE SIDE.) 3.a. X 3.b. 3.c. �C_ 3.d. x 3. e. Z) X 3.e.2) }C 3.e.3) Comments: 3.e.4) X 3.e.5) X - - 3.e.6) K- SIGNATURE OF PETITIONER DATE REVIEWED by Board of County Commissioners: __Ap� roved_ Conditions of Approval: .Disapproved: 3.e.7) k_ 3.e.8) 1� 3.e.9)�_ SIGNATURE OF COUNTY MANAGER JAN 13 2004 i 0 O v FAIR CAMPING m r HOF C WITS u 71T EUTWAY 0 �® r m g m g o � C� zi EDUCATION TENT GATE - t EXITWAY TO O® z� _ V T '>I'1 Y s n y� Y b m Pie b �� ZIOPE =Oy O GFN • A GEM - 3 F—G&-271 Oo n co �o ® 06 i m m_ +� n D Llij OVERFLOW PARKING C, © GEN T M AY AFtKWG MIDWAY CAMPING MIDWAY CAMPING Y v I ST i AGENDA ITEM NM A JAN 13 2004 pg--�-- 09/30/2003 10:18 4076670496 K&KINSLRANCEFLA PAGE 03/03 $EP 16 2003 15:13 FR K K�I NSURRNCi: 260 459 5629 T4 91467667 ®456 P . b:! IesuEM'�0 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 0864186 9J10/03 PRODUCER TW GERTIFMAT'E I$ mSuED A8 A v^MR OP INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON YNE CBRRTI 13 OR HO TER THE R 1 R w3 avcXD 'WaGxovlp >hC . CrpVTRAI3E AFP� � poucAE9 BELOW 1713 Magna Y P.O. Box 2338 Fort xayne, Zu 46801 CQMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY A G&aAZ VSR>:CAtI[ ASStTRAMM CdWA JRED LETTER COLL:C= C'OUZrry aMUcus.TURAL(SER Gr►13001) COMPANY 9 751 39TH AvswuE,N -E. LETTER NAp=, FL 34130' COMPANY c CpVEiiArGEB THIS IS TO CERTIFY - NAr 11aT POLIO � u UT. TERM CONDMW OF � OONTRJIO ORVOiM� DOCUMEW WITH RBSPECf TO PERIOD INDICATEn. %o WMIST MERBIM I9 SUEUF T 70 WHIOH THIS CERTIFICATE AV1Y 6E 18SUE0 OR MAY PERTAIN. THE IN&t1RANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES OnCRIBED Atl TNT "Isc.E TIFICASIW7S AND CONDRIONS OF SLICM POLICIES. WORD 611OWN MAY HAKE BEEN RBDt1CID BY PAID & A M& CO. NPF pF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER PWO&M M4'0�'Y� LIMfTB {h vmmwgm LTft i 12 : O SAN 12:01m camral • Oerr.rsj 4�ily pU 1 50 0 A � Genel>llLlabWY PAC0590752T01 4/15/03 4/15/04 4A�e�eiro i 100 ❑ aelm5 Merle 1100m Ead1 ownf"co 1 100 owner's a correctors Prot. i 30 .--, _ .- - • �.M..... tam mr e.rsenl i A C3 Any adu 8 All owned *L t $ 80♦d subs ®Hked allln NarOM,ea autos E7WM I HOW Other ff= Umorft tone ., ow pMt pNW LJakft 12:01AM 1201AM i 1 Pp,C0590'7g2701 1 4/15103 4/15/04 91 1 s s rm* Aporspae oR,elsrws s s 8t�h+kRjl _ E.eh Aeeld��l Paoklp m Msdlal Aee4bPt rrim M of OPERA x9 L:r&m A8 ADATTZCWkL INSUP= BUT OMY WITH MPECT THE C8B1"IP'zC,ATa 1iO3+I3BA TO LIASxLiT=_ARI9I>l9C+�ODT OF �T n SINS OR OPYRATxo> 8 OF T!i>7 NA>� HOARD OF COUMT COT7rtiSS'OkW" 3301 BAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34112 AGEPAA ITEM ATi1t: RXS1C � r/ A JAN 13 20'%A SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DEWRIMEO POUCW'S BE CANC»D BEFORE THE EWRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOiR 70 MAIL %Q_. DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE catTIFICATE HOLDER WAWO TO NO gmU0A ONlOR ELIAMLITY SUCH OP ANY IOND UPON E COMPANY, IT$ AGENTS OR RF- PRESENTATTVES. AvR a mm a rns ** TOTAL. PAGE.03 ** �. CERTIFICATE OF PROOUOER Allied e Specialty ty Insurance , 10451 Gulf Blvd. Treasure Island, FL 33706 800/237 -3355 .INSURED Blue Grass Shows, ' Inc P.O. Box 75244 Tampa, FL 33675 7f INSURANCE 1 9/17/03 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR . R. T.H.E. Insurance COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REOUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION �� GENERAL LIABILITY COMMERCIAL GENERAL LABILITY CLAIMS MADE 1 OCCUR M3 M F 9 7 4 3 06/10/03 0 6/ 10 / 0 4 EACH OCCURRENCE = 1,000,000 DAMAGE TO RENTED S 50,000 X MED EXP one i PERSONAL A ADV INJURY i 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE S PRODUCTS - COMP OP AGG i 1,000,000 GE AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY 17 PRO- L WrT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL ONINED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NO440 MEDAUTOS COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Es ecddeno S BODILY INJURY (PerPereOn) i BODILY INJURY (Per ec .0 i PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per occident) i GARAGE LIABILITY ANY AUTO AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT i OTHER THAN EA ACC AUTO ONLY: AGG S ExcESSluMBRE, L• LIASKM X OCCUR CLAIMS MADE DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERIEXECUTNE OFFICERAAEMBER EXCLUDED? R pee deecAbe under M 3 X F 9 7 4 4 06/10/03 0 6 10 0 4 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 AGGREGATE i 1,000,000 S i MEMIT 0TH E.L. EACH ACCIDENT I E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE i E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMB I i OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION! I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES I EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISKM Effective from 1/30/04 Additional Insured: COLLIER COUNTY FAIR BOARD, through 2/08/04 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AS RESPECTS TO THE OPERATION OF THE NAMED INSURED. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNME T AGENDA�IQTEMM - �LLIER COUNTY BOARD OF N&—A-6-4 )MMISSIONERS JAN 1 3�( Z: 4 9 ACORD 25 (2001108) SHOULD ANY OFTHE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SMALL NPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATNE ® ACORD CORPORATION 1951 THE COLLIER COUNTY AGRICULTURAL FAIR and EXPOSITION, INC. Collier County Fair 751 39th Avenue N.E. Naples, FL 34120 (239) 455 -1444 Fax: (239) 455 -6701 Activity Description List I. Blue Grass Shows A. 25 Amusement Items B. Concessions 1. Cotton Candy 2. Popcorn 3. Candy Apples C. Games for Prizes II. Display Booths A. Red Cross B. Ham Radio C. Mental Health D. Animal Care E. Civil Defense Exhibits F. Home Economics G. Military H. Emergency Medical Services 1. Women's Club J. Petting Zoo A. Agriculture F. Hobbies B. Livestock — 4H 1 FFA G. Culinary Arts C. Horticulture H. Canning D. Arts I. Clothing E. Crafts J. Ornamental IV. Concessions, Local Clubs Organizations & Professional Groups A. Hot Dogs F. Cake B. Hamburgers G. Ice Cream C. Sodas H. Foreign Foods D. Hero Sandwich I. Fruit E. Candy AGENDA ITEM NM-1 A `( JAN 13 2004 P9 SEP -17 -2003 JED 03:20 PM WASTE MANAGEMENT Ea ,to Managernent Of ( oilier County 4500 Exchange Ave Naples, FL 34104 -7025 (239) 849.2212 PHONE (239) 649-5844 FAX ACCOUNT NAME COLL1 R COUNTY FAIR, SERVICE 7 1513c. AVE NE ADDRESS CITY. ST ZIP Napt� FI -X120 COUNTY COLLIER FAX # S TEL # (239�?444 N7ACT Ann Wa« FAX N0. 2396495644 SERVICE AGREEMENT WASTES NON - HAZARDOUS BILLING NAME BILLING Renewal COntract ❑ SIC Code 99 Type Of BUSiness TR WM AGREEMENT NO. CUSTOMER ACCOUNT REASON CODE NEW 'EOFECTIVE DATE 01/22/04 COLLIER COUNTY FAIR 75139 AVE NE CITY, + COUNTY COLLIER TEL # 239 455 -1444 FAX # CONTACT Ann Ward EQUIPMENT /SERVICE SPECIPICA% oNS P. 01 SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF Ran+o+a►Charoe - ----- --------- • - - -• - r�A.} 7 RSIGtED INDIVIDUAL THAT HEISHE HAS READ AND Trip cn9rs ------------------- - - - •- - OF CUSTOMER AGKN0IMLE TO S10N ON WAVOLn �""M0"�' pNpS rHE'TERMS AND CONDITIONS E AUTHOW'rYEEMENT, ON fra^¢n,aeFe�--------------- -- � - -••- .. s UNIERST TFIAT HEISHE MAS TH T1iE REVERSE 5 iDE, AND . , �• ;:, BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER. delivery *please sigr & fax pack for prompt TERMS: NET 10 DAYS NTRACTOR M CUSTO ER �p leussoni Pa•_.. O ----•— (AIJfHpRCZED 7GNATUR4 1 7/03 510 91 ( , /4 & N(/ TERRt70RY NUMBER NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) Andrea M. Russom NAME (PRINT OF TYPE) i 98.14 ---------- • 9aT.izs0�rpaverM0Mh S --- -• ------•--- -• - - c"u-& ps -------------- I ------ Fwa N.*UP chw9ae S per%Jjt -- ---- ---- -- S Fwyard ....................... s ---- - - -•-' 161.94 '"f jpwr►.wa ----------- ----- • - - -•.. s 33.25 DWOgiWPw*rOh.............. - - - - -•- s s mpat Per LOW ----------------------- S TOW pot LAW ----------------- Ae1k" CwMe -- -- -. -- --•---• ---.., $ S&"Wetl Charge ... _ _ .. - - - --•--- -' S SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT ON BEHALF Ran+o+a►Charoe - ----- --------- • - - -• - r�A.} 7 RSIGtED INDIVIDUAL THAT HEISHE HAS READ AND Trip cn9rs ------------------- - - - •- - OF CUSTOMER AGKN0IMLE TO S10N ON WAVOLn �""M0"�' pNpS rHE'TERMS AND CONDITIONS E AUTHOW'rYEEMENT, ON fra^¢n,aeFe�--------------- -- � - -••- .. s UNIERST TFIAT HEISHE MAS TH T1iE REVERSE 5 iDE, AND . , �• ;:, BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER. delivery *please sigr & fax pack for prompt TERMS: NET 10 DAYS NTRACTOR M CUSTO ER �p leussoni Pa•_.. O ----•— (AIJfHpRCZED 7GNATUR4 1 7/03 510 91 ( , /4 & N(/ TERRt70RY NUMBER NAME (PRINT OR TYPE) Andrea M. Russom NAME (PRINT OF TYPE) 10/21/2003 22:22 2390000000 PROPOSAL J. W. CRAFT INC -, PORTABLE TOILETS WE'RE #1 IN THE #2 BUSINESS 768 Commercial Boulevard Naples, Fl. 34104 Phone: 239 - 261 -5768 Fax: 239 - 643 -3281 Toll Free: (800)238 -3813 ' Proposal Submitted To: Ann Phone (239)455.1444 Dante: October 22, 2003 NAME: Collier County Fairgrounds ADDRESS: 75139th Ave NE CITY. Naples JOB NAME: Fair ADDRESS: Naples Fairgrounds CITY: Naples PAGE 01 STATElZ1P. Florida STAT EIZIP. Florida We Herby submit specifications and estimates for: Portable Toilets Rental and services 24 Regular portable toilets @ $30.00 Each 2 Handicapped units @ $55.00 Each - Everyday Service @ $15.00 per unit per dory R.V. Tanks Service @ 15.00 Each 900 Gallon Tanks Service @ 150.00 Each Additional Tanks @ $225.00 Each - 300 Gallon Tank Service @ $35.00 Each Our service consists of extraction of waste, refill with chemical -water solution, paper, and urinal block, and cleansing the inside of the toilet. We are licensed and insured, proudly servicing Marco Island, Naples, Ft. Myers, Cape Cora4 Estero, Bonita Springs, and Lehigh Acres. We hereby propose to furnish labor and materials, complete in accordance with the above specifications, for the sum of t SW.00 1 payment to be made as followed: paid upon receipt of the invoice . All materials are guaranteed as spec(fled. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any a1terpth5qr deviation from the above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will co extra charge over and above the estimate. all agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyotyi our c rural. This proposal subject to acceptance within 30 days and is void thereafter at the option of the undersigned. i Authorized Signature: Aa= . nr.e nfproposal: �� The above prices, specifications and conditions are hereby accepted. You qr� authorized to work as specified Payment will be made as /t/r�vr. Signature- C C� l/t/ �i� Date: Print: Aa word Title: &� r- �rf D -(ifs �-0 6e d�l'veY� on 7�hurS�y Jan. No =' —� pg. II r SHERIFF DON HUNTER • COLLIER COUNTY 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg J, Naples, FL 34112 (239) 774 -4434 www.colliershedff.org September 17, 2003 Ms. Ann Ward Collier County Agricultural Fair And Exposition, Inc. 751 39'' Avenue N. E. Naples, Florida 34120 RE: Fair Security January 30, 2004 through February 8, 2004 Dear Ms. Ward: The Collier County Sheriffs Office will provide security for the 2004 Annual Collier County Fair and Agricultural Exhibit. Security will be per our agreement and contract which will bring the Fair into compliance with Collier County Ordinance, Chapter 8 %, Section 5 (2). 1 look forward to working with you at the Fair this year and if I can be of any further assistance, please call me. D03Ii HL Vte Sheritt ollier Cou FAGEMA Florida DH: jgm cc: Sgt. J. Mansberger File Fair 2004 --- "The duty of the Collier County Sheriff's Office is to preserve and protect the lives, property and constitutional guarantees of all persons." , COLLIER COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL, SERVICES 3301 East Tamiami' Trail • Bldg H • Naples, Florida 34112 (239) 774 -8459 • Fax (239) 775 -4454 October 17, 2003 Collier County Fair Board 751 39`h Avenue N.E. Naples, Florida 34120 Dear Ms. Ward, Collier County Emergency Medical Services is looking forward to working with the Big Corkscrew Fire Department to ensure that the Collier County Fair is provided with Advanced, Life Support coverage. As I understand from your letter, you are requesting coverage from January 30`h through February 8, 2004. As we move closer to the date, I will coordinate the logistics with the fire department, but rest assure we will be there in a manner similar to what we discussed in your previou's Board meeting. If I can be of any assistance in obtaining your permits, please do not'hpsitate to call. Sincerely, Jeff Page, Director Collier County EMS JAN 13 2004 c o r r� c o ti t Y p1g .3 /. BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT 132401mmokalee Road Naples, Florida 34120 (941) 348 -8006 (941) 455 -1204 October 9, 2003 Collier County Fair 751 39P Ave NE Naples, FL. 34120 Collier County Fair Board: This letter is to confirm the commitment from the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District/Volunteer Firefighters Association to provide fire inspections and fire protection during the 2004 Collier County Fair. The dates we have are January 30- February 8, 2004. There will be a fire protection fee of $200 per day, in addition to any inspection fees incurred. If you have any questions regarding these services you may contact Fire Marshal Todd Olson regarding inspection fees (348 -8006) or Assistant Chief Rita Greenberg regarding - fire protection services (455- 1204). Sincerely, Rita M. Greenberg Assistant Chief JAN 13 2004 1 Exhibit "A" ` 1 Part of Block 489, North Golden Gate, Unit 2, Collier County, Florida All that part of Block 489 of North Golden Gate Unit 2, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 9. Pages 29 through 43, Collier County Public Records, Collier County, Florida and being.more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Block 489: thence along the Northerly line of said Block 489: South 88'08'24" 'East 2012.89 feet; thence South 1'53'16" West 1184.51 feet: thence North 88'08'24" West 2038.4 feet to the West line of said Block 489: thence along said West line North 03'27'47" East 914.92 feet: thence continue along said West line North 01'53' 16" East 269.95 feet to the POM OF THE BEGiNN1NG on the parcel herein described: subject to easements and restrictions of record: (containing 55 acres). Less the following: BEGWNWG at the Northwest corner of said Block 489,: thence along the Northerly line of said Block 489, South 98'08'24" East 635.75 feet: thence Ieaving said north line, South 1'53' 16" West 800.00 feet: thence South 66'02'53" West 423.75:n thence South 1'5311611 West 200.25 feet: thence North 88'08'24" West 279.78 feet to the west line of said Block 489: thence along said West lime. North 3'27'47" East 914.92 feet: thence continue along said West line. North 1'53'16" East 269.95 feet to the 'Point of Beginning of the parcel herein descried: subject to easements and restrictions of record: (containing 15.0 acres more or less) (Denvsed Premises Containing 240 acres) W-aILL, I No P%kJCJ'VWr% 1. -- JAN 13 2004 � PQ. / - 4DDF..E'SSJ7V ,z ,'HECK LIST" PLEASE SUBMIT TAE FOLLOWYNC DOCU21ENT"S f. ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLEASE ATTACH 2. FOLIO NUMBERS c�oa I oo q- 000c 3. SURVEY FOR UNPLA r=D pRopERTMS _ PLEASE ATTACH 4. PR NAME /9 / n . _ 'F_'_. 5. 9r T NAmw FOR =Vmw i 6. EXlSSTINC PROJECT - SUPPLY SITE DrVELOPMENT PLAN NUM?IM /7. APP, PPLICABLE TO THE MLOVANG Px7MON TYPES: SITE DEVELOPhEM pyANS ADbUMM LI• U To' -IR TP DL'VWIO?AfZM PLANS CONSTRUCTION PLA3�I5/!'L 779 ALL LAND USE PZ=ONS SITS IMPROVEMENT PLANS ADhOMMENTS TO SIZE VdPROFEMENT_PLANS EXCAVAITON BLAS-MG PERMITS BRIGHT -0F WAY CLEARING/YEGSTATIONREMOVAL • STREET NAME REsoLi nom , TNSTJBST LICZT/1i, CHANGES S. PROPOSED CONDOMMOM D, "T NAXI S FOR MVP USE ONLY ADDRESS ISTMBER SIGNATURE O 'nAT'E ' II STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE & CONSUMER SERVICES TALLAHASSEE (850) 4874322 , FAIR PERMIT December 3, 2003 No.' 0317 Application and payment of fee in the amount of $275.00 having been made to the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services pursuant to Florida Statutes 616.15, for a permit to conduct a public fair or exposition, and raving been dete.:mined to be qualified by the Department, this Fair Permit is hereby issued to: Collier County Agricultural Fdir & Exposition, Inc. 751 39th Avenue Northeast Naples, Florida 34120 to conduct a public fair or exposition at: 751 39th Ave. N. E., Naples, Florida for the dates of January 30, 2004 through February 8, 2004. Form 410608 -099 1193 CHARLES H. BRONSON COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE AGENDA ITEM JAN 13 2004 t'a•_Lr�. DR -14 ��Consumer`s Certificate of Exemption E R. 01102 Issued Pursuant to Chapter 212, Florida Statutes OF RE`JENUE 21-00- 019878 -70C 09/30/02 09/30/07 ��F4Xk ASsoti,4 "TJ Effective Date Expiration Dale Exemplip.n categgry Certificate Number :,.. this certifies that COLLIER COUNTY AGRICULTURAL FAIR r AND EXPOSITION INC 751 39TH AVE NE NAPLES FL 33964 -1410 lfi is exempt from the payment of Florida sales and use tax on real property rented, transient rectal`prop "rdrited;;fangible personal property purchased or rented, or services purchased. DEPARTMENT nF REVENUE 2. 3. Important Information for Exempt Organizations DR -14 R. 01102 You must provide all vendors and suppliers with an exemption certificate before making tax - exempt purchases. See Rule 12A- 1.039, Florida Administrative Code (FAC). Your Consumer's Certificate of Exemption is to be used solely by your organization for your organization's customary nonprofit activities. Purchases made by an individual on behalf of the organization are taxable, even if the individual will be reimbursed by the organization. 4. This exemption applies only to purchases your organization makes. The sale or lease to others by your organization of tangible personal property, sleeping accommodations or other real property is taxable. Your organization must register, and collect and remit sales and use tax. on such taxable transactions. Note: Churches are exempt from this requirement except when they are the lessor of real property (Rule 12A- 1.070, FAC). 5. It is a criminal offense to fraudulently present this certificate to evade the payment of sales tax. Under no circumstances should this certificate be used for the personal benefit of any individual. Violators will be liable for payment of the sales tax plus a penalty of 200% of the tax, and may be subject to conviction of a third degree felony. Any violation will necessitate the revocation of this certificate. 6. If you have questions regarding your exemption certificate, please contact the Exemption Unit of Central Registration at 850 -487 -4130. The mailing address is 5050 West Tennessee Street, Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0100. . AGENDA ITEM , JAN 13 20M Pa•— — 1 Collier County Agricultural Fair & Exposition, Inc. COME TO THE FAIR GENERAL ADMISSION: 12 Years & Older - $7.00 Parking - $3.00 6-11 years - $3.00 Ride Coupons - $1.00 5 years & under— FREE Armbands - $15.00 Megapass - $18.00 H(')I IRq January 30 - Friday 5:00 p.m. — 12:00 a.m, (midnight) 8:00 p.m. — 12:00 a.m. MOONLIGHT MAGIC Armbands - $15.00 January 31 — Saturday 12:00 p.m. (noon) — 2:00 a.m. February 1 — Sunday 12:00 p.m. (noon) —11:00 p.m. Naples Daily News — buy one get one free 4 -H Day February 2 — Monday 5:00 p.m. — 11:00 p.m. Armbands - $15.00 February 3 — Tuesday 5:00 p.m. — 11:00 p.m. Armbands - $15.00 February 4 — Wednesday 5:00 p.m. — 11:00 p.m. Armbands - $15.00 February 5 — Thursday 5:00 p.m. — 11:00 p.m. February 6 — Friday 5:00 p.m. — 2:00 a.m. 11:00 p.m. — 2:00 a.m. MIDNIGHT MADNESS Armbands $15.00 February 7 — Saturday 12:00 p.m. (noon) —12:00 a.m. (midnight) Senior Citizens Day February 8 - Sunday 12:00 p.m. (noon) —10:00 p.m. AGENDA- ITFA q M ALL TENTS CLOSE AT 10:00 P.M. JAN 13 233 Pg.-I-L- official Receipt - Collier County Board of County Commissioners CDPR1103 - Official Receipt Date Post Date Pa ment SI Trans Number AR 5175 451078 12!1812003 2:44:51 PM 12118/2003 Appl Name: COLLIER COUNTY AGRICULTURAL FAIR & EXPOSITION, INC. Appl Stage /Status: REVIEW STAGE NO. 1 /PENDING Address: 751 39TH AVENUE N.E. NAPLES FL 34120 Proj Name: COLLIER COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS Type: TAZ: Subdiv Nbr: Project Nbr: 2003120045 Payor : COLLIER COUNTY AGRIC. Fee Information GL Account Amount Fee Code Descri tion 13113832634122000000 $275.00 11 CIRC FAIR & CIRCUS PERMITS Total $275.00 Payments Total Cash 1 $0.00 Total Non -Cash $275.00 Total Paid $275.00 Memo: Cashier /location: MCCAULEYKATY / 1 User: MONROIG_I AGENDA Va �Z " JAN 13 2004 Pa._ Collier County Board of County Commissioners CD -Plus for Windows 95 /NT Permit No. PERMIT FOR CARNIVAL EXHIBITION 0b"NES)a9W-617IJ11 COUNTY OF COLLIER: WHEREAS, John Yonkosky, Treasure, Collier County Agricultural Fair and Exposition, Inc., has made application to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, for a permit to conduct a fair and exposition, and WHEREAS, John Yonkosky, has presented to the Board sufficient evidence that all criteria for the issuance of a permit to conduct a fair and exposition as set forth in Chapter 10, Article II, Amusements and Entertainments, of the Collier County Code have been satisfied and that such fair and exposition exhibition will be conducted according to lawful requirements and conditions; and WHEREAS, said John Yonkosky, has requested a waiver of the, Surety Bond; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS PERMIT IS HEREBY GRANTED TO John Yonkosky, Treasurer, Collier County Agricultural Fair and Exposition, Inc., to conduct a fair and exposition from January 30, 2004 through February 8, 2004, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the petitioner's application and all related documents, attached hereto and incorporated herein for the following described property: (See attached Exhibit "A ") The request for waiver of Surety Bond and occupational license is hereby approved. WITNESS my hand as Chairman of said Board and Seal of said County, attested by the Clerk of Courts in and for said County tfiis ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Approved as to Form and Wjiienc Kb�GWdlj% Assistant County Attorney day of 2004. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: , CHAIRMAN JAN 13 2004 pg._ 07) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REQUEST TO APPROVE FOR RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT OF - -SABAL BAY COMMERCIAL PLAT - PHASE TWO ", AND APPROVAL OF THE STANDARD FORM CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND APPROVAL OF THE AMOUNT OF THE PERFORMANCE SECURITY OBJECTIVE: To approve for recording the final plat of "Sabal Bay Commercial Plat - Phase Two ", a subdivision of lands located in Section 24 Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, following the alternative procedure for approval of subdivision plats. CONSIDERATIONS: Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the construction drawings, specifications, and final plat of "Sabal Bay Commercial Plat - Phase Two ". These documents are in compliance with the County Land Development Code and Florida State Statute No. 177. All fees have been paid. Security in the amount of 10% of the total cost of the required improvements, and 1000 of the cost of any remaining improvements, together with a Construction and Maintenance Agreement for Subdivision Improvements, shall be provided and accepted by the Planning Services Director and the County Attorneys office prior to the recording of the final plat. This would be in conformance with the County Land Development Code - Division 3.2.9. Engineering Review Section recommends that, the final plat of "Sabal Bay Commercial Plat - Phase Two" be approved for recording. FISCAL IMPACT: The project cost is $826,457.15 (estimated) to be borne by the developer. The cost breakdown is as follows: a) Water & Sewer - $ 48,550.00 b) Drainage, Paving, Grading - $777,907.15 The Security amount, equal to 1100 of the project cost, is $909,102.86 I" -. NM —L —/L Is JAN 13 2004 Pg _.1_ Executive Summary Sabal Bay Commercial Plat - Phase Two Page 2 The County will realize revenues as follows: Fund: Community Development Fund 113 Agency: County Manager Cost Center: 138900 - Development Services Revenue generated by this project: Total: $14,891.00 Fees are based on a construction estimate of $826,457.15 and were paid in May, 2002. The breakdown is as follows: a) Plat Review Fee ($500.00 + $5. /ac)$ 540.00 b) Construction Drawing Review Fee Water & Sewer (.5% const. est.) -$ 242.75 Drainage, Paving, Grading (.42% const. est. -$ 3,267.21 c) Construction Inspection Fee Water & Sewer (1.5% const. est.) - $ 728.25 Drainage, Paving, Grading (1.3o const. est.) - $10,112.79 GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: �-- The Concurrency Waiver and Release relating to conditional approval has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office for the project. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: There are no outstanding environmental issues _HISTORICAL /ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: There are no historical or archaeological impacts EAC RECOMMENDATION: Approval CCPC RECOMMENDATION: Approval PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Final Plat of " Sabal Bay Commercial Plat - Phase Two" for recording with the following stipulations: 1. Approve the amount of $909,102.86 as performance security for the required improvements; or such lesser amount based on work completed, and as is approved by the Engineering Review Department. JAN 13 2004 P9_ A i— 110-- Executive Summary Sabal Bay Commercial Plat - Phase Two Page 3 2. Approve the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement, and a. That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the required improvements have received preliminary acceptance. b. That the plat not be recorded until suitable security and an appropriate Construction and Maintenance Agreement is approved and accepted by the Planning Services Director and the County Attorney's office. PREPARED BY: John R. Houldsworth, Senior Engineer Engineering Review REVIEWED BY: Thomas E. Kuck, P.E. Engineering Review Director, County Engineer APPROVED BY: K. Sc)imitt, Admi'ni.strator ity Development & Environmental Services z1► a Date Date ate No. _/ .4 JAN 13 2004 Pg. CL Q W 1-- CO •Gl.1N.L �.� rav-- �5 avoa Nave ww7 O s�1ii{{ FL+ 3 mvinM Y 3 �� xw Ravi F� G CL moavn e n�� 5 3 E ` cn a o Y aan V Z 31iaa 3aoH5AV0 � � O b J 77 o g 192 x 1 3 20 Larva, -3u ' � ry a Pa• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REQUEST TO APPROVE FOR RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT OF "DELASOL PHASE THREE ", AND APPROVAL OF THE STANDARD FORM CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND APPROVAL OF THE AMOUNT OF THE PERFORMANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPT THE COUNTY PARK DEDICATION AGREEMENT OBJECTIVE: To approve for recording the final plat of "Delasol Phase Three ", a subdivision of lands located in Section 24 Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, following the alternative procedure for approval of subdivision plats. A proposed County Park also lies within the limits of this plat and is being dedicated on the plat. A supplemental agreement has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's office. CONSIDERATIONS: Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the construction drawings, specifications, and final plat of "Delasol Phase Three ". These documents are in compliance with the County Land Development Code and Florida State Statute No. 177. All fees have been paid. Security in the amount of 10% of the total cost of the required improvements, and 100% of the cost of any remaining improvements, together with a Construction and Maintenance Agreement for Subdivision Improvements, shall be provided and accepted by the Planning Services Director and the County Attorneys office prior to the recording of the final plat. This would be in conformance with the County Land Development Code - Division 3.2.9. Engineering Review Section recommends that the final plat of "Delasol Phase Three" be approved for recording. The project is a 45 Lot subdivision being developed by Meridian Land Company. FISCAL IMPACT: The project cost is $632,286.67 (estimated) to be borne by the developer. The cost breakdown is as follows: a) Water & Sewer - $178,036.00 b) Drainage Paving, Grading - $454,250.67 The Security amount, equal to 110% of the project cost, is $695,515.34 Nm - /-b JAN 13 2004 Executive Summary Delasol Phase Three Page 2 The County will realize revenues as follows: Fund: Community Development Fund 113 Agency: County Manager Cost Center: 138900 - Development Services Revenue generated by this project: Total: $20,040.11 Fees are based on a construction estimate of $632,286.67 and were paid in August, 2003. The breakdown is as follows: a) Plat Review Fee($1000.00 + $5. /ac $ 1,071.50 b) Construction Drawing Review Fee Water & Sewer (.75% const. est.) - $ 1,335.27 Drainage, Paving, Grading (.75% const. est. $ 3,406.88 c) Construction Inspection Fee Water & Sewer (2.25% const. est.) Drainage, Paving, Grading (2.25% const. est.) GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: - $ 4,005.81 - $10,220.65 The Concurrency Waiver and Release relating to conditional approval has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office for the project. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: There are no outstanding environmental issues HISTORICAL /ARCHEOLOGICAL IMPACT: There are no historical or archeological impacts EAC RECOMMENDATION: Approval CCPC RECOMMENDATION: Approval PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Final Plat of "Delasol Phase Three" for recording with the following stipulations: 1. Approve the amount of $695,515.34 as performance security for the required improvements; or such lesser amount based on work completed, and as is approved by the Engineering Review Department. JAN 13 2004 P,. a Executive Summary Delasol Phase Three Page 3 2. Approve the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement, and a. That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the required improvements have received preliminary acceptance. b. That the plat not be recorded until suitable security and an appropriate Construction and Maintenance Agreement is approved and accepted by the Planning Services Director and the County Attorney's office. PREPARED BY: John R. Houldsworth, Senior Engineer Engineering Review REVIEWED BY: Thomas E. Kuck, P.E. Engineering Review Director, County Engineer APPROVED BY: h K. Schmitt, Adininistrator nity Development & Environmental Services IZ`�L Date Da e sz- a at ACXMA ITEM Nm /(0 l JAN 1 3 200�t Pg. 3 Nil IEEE■ 1N��■ _ . ■- -11 ��■ ■,_ Iii ii i� �::_ ��■ � _. 0101..... . IN ■ `��I��J . ■0101...., ■■ ■ � ■ . 0101... . 01 01010101 ii 0101i01i '■■_ .0101 01! �....� 01 .■ 01010101 ......� 010101011.010101010121 0101 0101 0121 .01 0101 01 ■� �.�:.• ., ;, 0101... 1■■■ ___ .. �... �..... 01,0101 �— 0121 0101 0101 .. 1- 0121- - -011 2121 0101 0101 01_ '-■ __ =21 21 0101 0101 m_. 01■ ! 21 01.2101 =01.� : ii i ■�ii'i01!01i =01101: ,, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I/ ► �i..i01 101= 101.0101..1 == � 01010101 0101' 0101 0101 01r'.._" = : ■ ■ ■= . 01 0101 .01 0101 0101 0101 0101 0121 ■"� _ 01 2101.0101 =2101 0101 0101 0101 01• 01 0101-0101.0101 0101 0101 0101 01. •• �� ..010101.01010101..01. � ■� . �I 01,01' 01 0121 0101 01. 01 21_ _ � �� 21'21 01010101 .2101011 . ■ _. _► 0101.,_- �► � 21 � �....� •_� x•'.01010101..01 �� 210121.01. .01.E . • 011.01 0121 01... � � 01 .01.0101 0101 -� _ .� � ■�._;. ■21`.I� \- ♦ � ..0101... 01a .: ■01;01.:.. _i - I a0101f01. 01. 0101 .��_��_�..�111111111111111■ � 11 �I�� . . 0101■�■_ _ 01,01:: I 01'0101 01 �.�■ * 21 all ,...;:.. ■21 ■ � ■�� /�� ■� �, . 011 i i M- a m 0 Ao / 7 NNW M- uj H il S i J g p m � s "0 oarnnroe Rrooi N 2 SC — 31V15431M $p .,TD AYLIYgJ • 1100 SOOUA SS�Idl0 j �'� rI � Qi n g i n /� i. SC - 31V1SHMMI 11NNGSTOR ROAD � a +�YpmQ 16w� NrOfl3d , OVOtl MO1$ g W g LLI r {{ �5 J U 3 $ W o OVO71 Dr .. UlDdtlIV pp 8$ 8 3 s 6 3 S a = W „iry CL ° a A all $ $ i ` Y= (Ko Qr o we a -J) lie P il S i J EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD BID No. 04- 3591 — "FURNISH & DELIVER FIVE (5) CREW CAB FLAT BED DUMP TRUCKS" TO WALLACE INTERNATIONAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $279,950.00. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board approve award of Bid # 04 -3591 — furnish & deliver five (5) crew cab flat bed dump trucks to Wallace International in the amount of $279,950.00. CONSIDERATIONS: This Bid was publicly posted on October 28, 2003 in the lobby of the Purchasing Building with sixty -six (66) notices being sent to firms advising them of the bid. Nineteen (19) firms requested full bid packages. Two responses were received by the due date of November 26, 2003. The bid responses received were as follows: Wallace International $279,950.00 Walsh Freightliner $289,928.80 Upon review and discussion of the bids submitted, Staff recommends that Bid No. 04 -3591 be awarded to Wallace International, as the lowest, qualified, and responsive bidder based on the total bid. See the attached Bid Tabulation sheet. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $279,950.00 are budgeted in the Road Maintenance Fund 101 Capital. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board award Bid No. 04 -3591 to Wallace International, for the purchase of five (5) crew cab flat bed dump trucks. REVIEWED BY: DATE: / O ohn Vliet, ad Mainte7_,�71;��. ntendent I REVEIWED Y:9b& _ DATE:Ste hen . Carnel Directo Purchasng Department REVEIWED BY: DATE: *YA3 Mike A ,telamaki, PE, Road Maintenance Director APPROVED BY:_ N E: F DATE: � a3 ,AICP, Transportation Administrator A NDA i LEM No. JAN 13 2004 Pg. ` k » 7 2 24 e 2 m 2 q ��f k § CL N r O c § wi / [ k . ^ / % /' C CD L \ cE 2 $c. 2\. /J E / CO S 7 _ 6� � � � $ Cil / \ /Ul co \ « k ƒ « % a CD aD °� \ cn J CD E I . . � / q / f / �k f E E m « A « En CD / / / / p E .�, § 2 CD � % % nm \ ± .� \ O § � � § \ � ECD \ C CD q ƒk % C� /cn O o\ E � & R � § R % R \�� < ƒ CD ]AN s} / e � P$ � � I / C / m m � : c cn _ _ /IA �k 7 C / �§ I II $ § 7 7 � 7 ƒ ƒ = =0 } } „ ¥ ¥ m m n m n_ w w�- § % C CD 0 ?2 / 0 / C f CD w w / \ W W / \ § § f .�, § 2 CD � % % nm \ ± .� \ O § � � § \ � ECD \ C CD q ƒk % C� /cn O o\ E � & R � § R % R \�� < ƒ CD ]AN s} / e � P$ � � EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE THE TRANSFER BY DEED OF A PORTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT ( "DISTRICT ") TO COLLIER COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA ( "COUNTY "), AND APPROVE REIMBURSEMENT TO DISTRICT IN AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE PRO -RATED PURCHASE PRICE PAID FOR THE PROPERTY BY DISTRICT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SIX -LANE SECTION OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD (PROJECT NO. 63051). ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT: $12,381.00. OBJECTIVE: To convey by Statutory Deed a right -of -way parcel from the Water -Sewer District to Collier County for the construction of a six -lane section of Vanderbilt Beach Road between Airport Road and Collier Boulevard (CR 951). CONSIDERATIONS: As part of the Santa Barbara Force Main Interconnect Project, the District purchased the West 180 feet of Tract 44, of Golden Gate Estates, Unit 95, as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 45, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. A portion of the parcel obtained by District was determined to be necessary for the Vanderbilt Beach Road six - laning project between Airport Road and Collier Boulevard (CR 951). The Board of County Commissioners authorized the purchase of right -of -way for the Vanderbilt Beach Road project on November 5, 2002, under Resolution No. 2002 -463. Concurrency requirements indicate that construction of improvements to this roadway segment should commence late in the first quarter of 2004. (�ISCAL IMPACT: The District agreed to convey the property for a transfer of funds in the , amount of $12,375.00 ($75,000 per acre for 0.165 acres). This was the price they paid when acquiring it in June 2003. In addition, the Statutory Deed will be recorded in the public records at a cost of $6.00 in' recording fees. Therefore the total cost of this acquisition is $12,381.00. Said fees to be paid from gas tax fund 313. The fees will be reimbursed to the Public Utilities Wastewater impact fee fund 413. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: As part of the County's Capital Improvement Element, Nos. 24 and 63, the Vanderbilt Beach Road project is an integral part of Collier County's Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County: (1) Approve the transfer by Statutory Deed from the Water -Sewer District to Collier County and authorize its Chairman to execute said Statutory Deed on behalf of the District; and (2) Authorize staff to record the Statutory Deed in the public records of Collier County, Florida; and (3) Approve transfer of funds as stated. No. JAN 13 _ SUBMITTED REVIEWED BY: Page 2 of 2 �Kakilu `--' I DATE: ll Gi Lorraine Lan , ight -of -W Coordinator Trar ion Rightp� a Offic , DATE: evin Ken cks, Right- y Acquisition Manager Trans p tion Ri ht o f Way Office . �l- 6 -D 3 DATE. Allen R. Ruth, P.E., Senior Project Manager Transp,yftation Engineering & Construction Management REVIEWED BY: DATE: Mohan V. Thampi, P.E., Senior Project Manager Public Utilities ineering Department REVIEWED BY: ✓� DATE: o B. Anderson, P.E., Director bli ilitie ngineen g Department REVIEWED BY: DATE: IZ a Gre R. Strakaluse, P. ., TECM Director Engineering and Construction Ij"gement Department APPROVED BY: APPROVED BY: DATE: s zn F- e> 3 e} ony, Public Utilities Adm Pu iottilities Administration DK DATE: Id-117103 n Feder, AICP, Administrator ` ,ortation Services Division A�A T, EM No. JAN 13 20M Pg. a PROJECT: Vanderbilt Beach Road - 63051 PARCEL: 142 FOLIO: Part of 41823400008 Prep ared by: Ellen T. Chadwell, Ettuire Office of the County Attorney 3301 Ecst Tswiaml Tretl Naples, Florida 34112 (441) 174 -8400 STATUTORY DEED THIS DEED, made this day of , 20_, by THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF --OLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUN -Y AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WE.TER -SEWER DISTRICT (hereinafter called the Grantor), whose post office address i -, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida, 34112 to COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, (hereinafter called the Grantee). (Whenever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and their respective heirs, successors or assigns.) WITNESSETH that the Grantor, to- and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) to it in hand paid b\ the Grantee, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargan and sell unto the Grantee, the following described land lying and being in Collier County, Florida: The Northerly 40.00 feet of Tract 44, less and except the West 180 feet, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 95, according to the plat th -:reof as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 45, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Subject to easements, restrict ons, and reservations of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name by Governing Board the Board of County Commissioners acting by its Chairman, the day and year aforesaid. Property acquisition approved by ECC pursuant to Resolution No. 2002 -463, November 5t ". 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk , Deputy Clerk (OFFICIAL SEAL) as t fva 1 sufficiency Assistant County Attorney Ellen T. Om4mell THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOB ERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND 'AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER - SEWER DISTRICT By: TOM HENNING, Chairman ado.. — ANI 13 2015', Pg. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION BY GIFT OR PURCHASE OF PERPETUAL, NON- EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS, AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS, WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SIGNAL SYSTEM MAST ARM ASSEMBLIES AND CONTROL BOXES AT INTERSECTIONS AT SR 29 AND IMMOKALEE DRIVE, AT SR 29 AND 1st STREET IN IMMOKALEE, AND AT THE INTERSECTION OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND TROPICANA BOULEVARD. ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT: $5,100.00. OBJECTIVE: To obtain authorization from the Board of County Commissioners to acquire by gift or purchase all rights and interests in real property which are required for the construction and maintenance of computerized signal system improvements at the intersections of SR 29 and Immokalee Drive, at SR 29 and 1St Street in Immokalee, and at the intersection of Golden ,-- Gate Parkway and Tropicana Boulevard. CONSIDERATIONS: As part of the Collier County Advanced Traffic Management System Phase Two signal upgrades, the Traffic Operations Department determined that it was necessary to modify or replace traffic signal supports and controller cabinets relating to these intersections. There are five locations affected by this resolution. The first location is at the southwest corner of Immokalee Drive and SR 29. Traffic Operations intends to remove the existing cabinet and replace it with one compatible with the computerized system. Once replaced, they will place no parking signs, ground striping and/or barriers along the front of the cabinet so that parked cars will not block access to the cabinet doors. The second location is at the southeast corner of South 1St Street and SR 29. Traffic Operations intends to place a traffic signal Mast Arm within the parking lot. The third location is at the southwest corner of South 1s' Street and SR 29. Traffic Operations intends to place a traffic signal Mast Arm with an attached streetlight on the property. The fourth location is at the northwest corner of North 1" Street and SR 29. Traffic Operations intends to place a traffic signal Mast Arm on the property. AGfi D TEM No. JAI-1 13 '�&34 Pg. Page 2 of 3 The fifth location is at the northwest corner of Golden Gate Parkway across from Tropicana Blvd. There is a pre- existing Mast Arm here. Traffic Operations will only need a Temporary Construction Easement to modify the existing Mast Arm and add a pedestrian signal. Adoption of the attached Resolution will provide the Board's authorization and directive to staff to secure title work, prepare in -house real estate appraisals, make written purchase offers for the real property interests required to construct the project, and to negotiate and close on the purchase of the afore - mentioned right -of -way and easement parcels. (,FISCAL IMPACT: Staff estimates that all of the right -of -way Acquisitions can be secured for U roughly $5,100.00. This amount includes the cost to purchase all land and improvements, as well as expenses for title work, real estate appraisals, and recording fees. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The work authorized by this Resolution is designed to enhance the safety of citizens as they use existing County roads. Thus, the recommendation is consistent with the County's long range planning efforts. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County: 1. Adopt the attached Resolution; 2. Approve and authorize its Chairman to execute same on behalf of the Board; and 3. Approve and authorize any budget amendments that may be necessary to implement the collective will of the Board as evidenced by the adoption of the attached Resolution and the approval of this Executive Summary. 4. Accept the easements once conveyed for the purposes of recording. 5. Authorize staff to record the easements, subordinations and partial releases in the public records of Collier County, Florida. Tt�rTEIM R JA ? 40.;`I pg. �;), SUBMITTED BY: Lo ine Lantz, Right- f -Wa oordinator Transportation / ACM / ROW REVIEWED B' Page 3 of 3 Date: Date: 12'-e9- 03 ks, Right- ay Acquisition Manager on / ECM / ROW REVIEWED BY: G'' Date: Robert W. Tipton, P.E., County Traffic Operations Engineer Traffic Operations and Alternative Transportation Modes Department REVIEWED BY: _ Date: % 1, /,03 Gq(�) Gregg R. Strakaluse, P.E., TECM Director Transportation / Engineering and Construction Management Department REVIEW D BY: / w Date: /;2 Diane B. Flagg, Director Traffic Operations and Alternative Transportation Modes Department s APPROVED BY: Date: Id-17-al Normo Feder, AICP, Administrator Tran ortation Services Division too. TT JAN 13 120"414 Pg. RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION BY GIFT OR PURCHASE OF PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, DRAINAGE AND /OR UTILITY EASEMENTS, .AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS, WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SIGNAL SYSTEM MAST ARM ASSEMBLIES AND CONTROL BOXES AT INTERSECTIONS AT SR 29 AND IMNIOKALEE DRIVE, AT SR 29 AND IST STREET IN IMMOKALEE, AND AT THE INTERSECTION OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND TROPICANA BOULEVARD. WHEREAS, due to continually increasing :raffic volumes, road improvements and anticipated signal upgrades, it is now necessary and it is in the best interests of the citizens of Collier County to improve the signals, control panels and cabinets relating to the intersections at Immokalee Drive and SR 29, South 1" Street and SR 29, North I" Street and SR 29, and the northwest center of Golden Gate Parkwav across from Tropicana Boulevard; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the Florida Department of Transportation the Board of County Commissioners approved a negotiated contract for professional engineering services with the firm of Gray, Calhoun and Associates for the design of these signal upgrades; and WHEREAS, the design contract began in July of 2001; and 'WHEREAS, Gary, Calhoun and Associates has produced a 100 ",o design plan which shows the need for additional easements for the installation of the signal improvements as depicted on Exhibit 'A" (easement legal descriptions) and WHEREAS, the construction of the transportation improvements and related facilities currently being designed by Gary, Calhoun and Associates aiong the project, as depicted on Exhibit "A," are necessary in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Collier County, and will assist Collier County in meeting certain concurrency requirements of the Growth Management Plan for Collier County_ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: The Board has determined that the signalization improvements at the intersections of SR 29 and Immokalee Drive, at SR 29 and I" Street, and at the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and .GV--�' iT- J : 11. 20-31 Pg. A. Tropicana Boulevard (hereinafter collectively ref -=cd to as the "Project') are necessary and are in the best interest of Collier County. 2. The construction and maintenance of the transportation improvements and related facilities are compatible with the long ranee planting goals and objectives of the Growth Management Plan for Collier County. 3. It is necessary and in the best interest of Collier County for the Board to acquire perpetual, non- exclusive road right -of -way, drainage and /or utility easements, and temporary construction easements within the Project corridor identified on Exhibit "A," and County Staff is hereby authorized and directed to acquire said right -of -way and associated easement interests by gift or purchase. 4. The Board hereby directs staff to use independent appraisal reports or internal compensation estimates as staff determines is necessary to best serve the needs of the Project in a timely and cost - effective manner. 5. The Board, in accordance %ith the provisions of Section 125.355, Florida Statutes, hereby formally waives the requirement for a formal, independent appraisal report for the purchase of a property where the purchase price is less than One Hundred Thousand and 00,1100 Dollars ($100.000.00). In lieu of the independent appraisal report, staff is hereby authorized to make purchase offers for the properties, the dollar amounts of which shall be predicated on "staff compensation estimates" based upon independent appraisals (and the data therefrom) obtained on similar properties and upon consideration and application of appropriate market value and cost data pertinent to the subject parcels. 6. The Board hereby authorizes its present Chairman and and, subsequent Chairman, for the life of the Project, to execute any instruments which have been approved by the Office of the County Attorney, to remove the lien of any encumbrance and for any such other purpose as may be required for the acquisition of property rights necessary for the construction of the project. 7. In those instances where negotiated settlements are obtained via the 'Purchase Agreement" or "Easement Agreement" mechanism, the Administrator of the Transportation Division, or any Project Manager of his designation, is hereby delegated the authority to approve the purchase of property rights above the staff compensation estimate or appraised value, and pay nonnally related costs, when it is in the best interest of the Project, and when the difference between the proposed negotiated settlement amount (purchase price) and compensation estimate (or the appraised value) is less than -Page '- A� IT No JA! � 1 Pg. Twenty -Five Thousand and 00;100 Dollars (S25,t 00.001, or the current purchasing limits established by the Collier County Purchasing Department, pro, ided, Project funding is available. That the settlement approval authority is delegated by the Board to the extent that such approvals do not conflict with the provisions of Section 125.355, Florida Statutes. 9. The Chairman of the Board is hereby authorized to execute Easement Agreements and Purchase Agreements which have been approved it the manner set forth in Paragraph ?. 10. Where the property owner agrees, throu>h the execution of a "Purchase Agreement" or "Easement Agreement," to convey a necessary ia:erest in real property to the Count \,, and upon the proper execution by the property cwner of those deeds, easements, or such other legal documents as the Office of the County Attorney may require, the Board hereby authorizes the Finance Department to issue warrants, payable to the proparty owner(s) o -record, in those amounts as shall be specified on a closing statement and which shall be based upcn the appraisal or staff compensation estimate in accordance, ith this Resolution and the provisions of Section 125.355, Florida Statutes. 11. All title to properties or interests in prc:ocrties which have been obtained in the manner described above shall be deemed "accepted" by the Board of County Commissioners, as the governing body of Collier County, Florida, a political subdi-,-ision of the State of Florida, and as such, staff is hereby authorized to record in the Public Records c f Collier County, Florida, deeds, casements or other ---_ instruments as may be required to remove the lien of any encumbrance from the acquired properties. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED on ;his second and majority vole. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Clerk Approved as to form and legal ufficien y: 1 Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney day of 2003, after motion, F•OARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA Bv_: TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN -P� ae 3- AG N A ITEM No.� — ., z Anil Pg. -- 141 / r ------ - - - - -- L-8D -� / -------------- - - - - -- 'li / ° �) o ° A r -- I -- s -_ I I- _ J O E` - - - - - - - - - 7t - - O E B T,- - - - - - - - - r - - B Tr= ° F• � I IMMOKALEE DRIVE 716 � ------ al 5'0' � f w � -1 J_ 'COI � I I PROPOSED I EASEMENT � I I N I FOLIO N®. EXHIBIT A Page of 10 PERPETUAL, NON — EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT-0F —WAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT Prepared by : GRIARM1CAtR10R/H P 2909 BAY TO BAY BOULEVARD SUITE 208 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33629 PHONE (813) 831 -8870 FAX (813) 831 -9375 z� I 1-T T- � I I N4, r '� I � I � l � I I � 1 I � I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1 rL � I�1 e s -') Drawn by KM Project CITY OF NAPLES /COLLIER COUNTY Title: AIMS DG2 project No. 2011201 FD'r2 wingINTERSECTION 984 Date 05/20/02 e: SR 29 0 IMMOKALEE DRIVE page PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2685 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 659 -5773 EXHIBIT A P age Ofd_ PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT -OF -MY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) PROJECT NO.......... PARCEL NO .............. r, FOLIO NO... ( q Lo cli( v/ TAX PARCEL NO........... THE SOUTH 15 FEET OF THE NORTH 52 FEET OF THE WEST 5 FEET OF THE EAST 55 FEET OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FAG,Et,iDA ITEM 13 2004 Pg•____— PREPARED BY....... ..... DATE...G ..Z'.3 EORGEIt_+ RICHMOND PROFEZ IONAL LAND SURVEYOR -FL. REG. # 2406 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 2685 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOOTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PARCEL 984 SHEET 1 OF 1 m on m hS �i �• 1 1 6 IlLu i �,7r, N' L I I �I i � I I� I I I� cl-- I � I � 3 L I I I li Prepared by : GW-CAVIOM 0' 2909 BAY TO BAY BOULEVARD GCISUTI'E 208 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33629 PHONE (813) 831 -8870 FAX (813) 831 -9375 a� m - - - - -- If - - - - -- SR 29 PROPOSED EASEMENT EXHIBIT 14 Page_ of PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, DR AND UTILITY EASEME FOLIO NO Project CITY OF NAPLES /COLLIER COUNTY l Dawn by 7�'I Tide: AIMS DG2 project No. 2011201 Drawing INTERSECTION 990 Date 05/20/02 j i0e; SR 29 ®1ST STREET page PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2685 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 659 -5773 EXHIBIT page �- .—of=6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) PROJECT NO.......... PARCEL NO .............. FOLIO NO... 571 TAX PARCEL NO........... THE NORTH 8 FEET OF THE WEST 17 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK C, OF THE PLAT THEREOF, IMMOKALEE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 60, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT A C ! No. ( — JAN 13 c� a P9• 1 PREPARED B GEORGE R. RICHMOND PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR -FL: REG. # 2406 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 2685 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 1 NTER. 990 SHEET 1 OF 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — SR 29 PROPOSED ' EASEMENT EXHIBIT .� Page-�L of PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD R*W-OF -WAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT Prepared by : GRAV'GIMQ11 �' 2909 BAY TO BAY BOULEVARD GC1SUTTE 208 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33629 PHONE (813) 831 -8870 FAX (813) 831 -9375 W u' II "I .I II I I I nl ' I I I II I I I 'I I II I I I it II �I I it I I II I it ! �I No. If 111 I II II II II {I II II II II II II 11 II II II II II II II II II II II II II I� „ II N 1 II .10 1001' P9• U Project Drawn by XM Title: CO ATMS DG2 Project No. 2011201 Date 05/20/02 Drawing INTERSECTION 990 Title: SR 29 0 1ST STREET __J Page PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2685 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 659 -5773 PROJECT NO.......... PARCEL NO .............. FOLIO NO... �CC TAX PARCEL NO........... EXHIBIT Page_ Of PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT-0F -WAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) THE NORTH 8 FEET OF THE WEST 15 FEET OF THE EAST 21 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OF THE PLAT THEREOF, CARSON SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 40, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. No JAN 13 20..04 Pg. . t a PREPARED B/SION�Al- ,� .. ..... ......., t: �._.:.;:...... DATE ... ��..� ✓��.? GEORGE R. RICHMOND PRO LAND SURVEYOR= .F,L.:REG. # 2406 TRANSPO' TATION ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT. 2685 HORSE-SHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, rF LORIDA 34104 PARCEL 990Sw SHEET 1 OF 1 I I I EXHIBIT�= w P� of� PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, DRAINAGE I AND UTILITY EASEMENT I FOLIO NO.L�/�� I 00 I � 26110;' PROPOSED EASEMENT I It /u/ SR 29 LALAA I P2 I PT - - - --- - - - - - - w - r - - - - -- Jr - - - - - - - - - - - - - D AC N AF I 2 JAN Pg. Prepared by : Gmm' I' 2909 BAY TO BAY BOULEVARD GC1SUITE 208 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33629 PHONE (813) 831 -8870 FAX (813) 831 -9375 / Drawn by XM Project Title: CITY OF NAPLES /COLLIER COUNTY ATMS DG2 Project No. 2011201 Date 05/20/02 INTERSECTION 990 [Drawing : SR 29 ® 1ST STREET Page PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2685 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 659 -5773 EXHIB Tlof PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) PROJECT NO.......... PARCEL NO .............. FOLIO NO...�(LC TAX PARCEL NO........... THE SOUTH 10 FEET OF THE EAST 27 FEET OF THE LOT 23, BLOCK "A" OF THE PLAT THEREOF, FRED WHIDDEN SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 36, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. AG IT No. JAN 13 2004 Pg. PREPARED BY.. %� �... ...i ... ::................ DATE....G GEORGE R. RICHMOND` PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR- FL. -REG. # 2406 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 2685 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH. . NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PARCEL 990NW SHEET 1 OF 1 z� \ \tea \ r� FOLIO NO. °�� 1 C�D`7 E�x T Pat, o TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTM ' ," (DURATION: S Y& P� - .c- `MMENCEMENT OF CONS-1 Rl)L i I j PROPOSED EASEMENT o�ol 0. IX FF21 ' P4 > \ \ ' Prepared by : GW►'G1t ►OIJN P 2909 BAY TO BAY BOULEVARD SUITE 208 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33629 PHONE (813) 831 -8870 FAX (813) 831 -9375 1- Pg. Project Drawn by X111 CITY OF NAPLES /COLLIER COUNTY Title: ATMS DG2 Project No. 2011201 Date 05/20/02 Drawing INTERSECTION 589 Title: GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY a TROPICANA BOULEVARD Page PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2685 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 659 -5773 'E XHIBIT Page PROJECT NO.......... PARCEL NO .............. FOLIO NO... jj s Vc cQ -q w0 / TAX PARCEL NO........... LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) THE SOUTH 11 FEET OF THE WEST 12 FEET OF THAT PARCEL AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 3043, PAGE 1194, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) No JAN 13 1004 pg. 1l�_ PREPARED B :....... :.DATE. .................. GEORGE R. RICHMOND PROF SSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR -FL. REG. # 2406 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 2685 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PARCEL 589 SHEET 1 OF 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE MODIFICATION TO CORRECT A SCRIVENER'S ERROR TO CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 1 WITH APAC- SOUTHEAST, INC. REGARDING IMMOKALEE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; PROJECT NO. 60018 (NO FISCAL IMPACT) OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board approval of a modification to Contract Amendment No. I to correct a scrivener's error that identified APAC- Southeast, Inc. as APAC - Florida, Inc. CONSIDERATIONS: On October 22, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners approved a contract with APAC - Florida, Inc. for road and utility improvements along Immokalee Road. On July 29, 2003, the Board approved Contract Amendment No. 1 which represented additional work, cost and contract time due to unanticipated delays associated with Federal Regulatory permitting. As previously presented to the Board, this item was thoroughly reviewed by the Clerk of Courts' Office, the Purchasing Department, the County Attorneys' Office and Transportation. Since that time, the Clerk of Courts has identified a scrivener's error in which Contract Amendment No. 1 was signed by Mr. Wes Tanner, a representative of APAC, Florida, Inc. when, as of March 2003, APAC had merged with its sister company and changed their official company name to APAC, Southeast, Inc. This name change presented a serious problem to the Clerk of Courts resulting in withheld payments of approximately $320,000. Attached, please find a letter from Mr. Wes Tanner, Vice President of APAC, Southeast indicating his continuing authority to represent the company and maintain all previous contractual obligations. Also attached is modified Contract Amendment No. 1 that corrects the previously identified scrivener's error. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to approving the modification to Contract Amendment No. 1. If Contract Amendment No. 1 is not approved, the Clerk of Courts has indicated he will not make payments to the Contractor. The Contractor has indicated that he would immediately cease operations along Immokalee Road and submit damage claims to the County for the delay. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This Capital Improvement Element (CIE #71) is consistent with the Transportation Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Approve the modification to Contract Amendment No. 1 which clarifies and recognizes that APAC - Florida, Inc. has officially become APAC- Southeast, Inc. and that the originally signed contract and all signed amendments and change orders with APAC - Florida, Inc. for Project No. 60018 continue to be valid, binding and enforced by the County and APAC- Southeast, Inc.; and 2. Recognize that this event was not considered an assignment under s tioh AMNDAIM General Terms & Conditions. 0 JAN I 3 2004 P� I nn Thorpe, P.E., Principal Project Manager Date N _ � Gregg Str*aluse, P.E, Director Date Normgh Feder, Administrator Legal eview i lb4te /— ?— D Date zz.v j4lx� —/ L, b c/ Wes Tanner, Contractor Date APAC Southeast, Inc. Mim JAN 13 2004 I Exhibit A -1 Contract Amendment No. 1 Contract #02 -3419 "Immokalee Road Improvement Project" This amendment, dated July 1, 2003, to the referenced agreement shall be by and between the parties to the original Agreement, APAC - Southeast, Inc. (to be referred to as "Contractor" and Collier County, Florida, (to be referred as "Owner "). Statement of Understanding #02 -3419 "Immokalee Road Improvement Project" By signing below, the contractor agrees to amend the above referenced Contract as follows: Amendment to Exhibit I – Supplemental Terms and Conditions to read as follows: EXHIBIT I SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Immokalee Road – Collier Boulevard to 43`d Avenue Phasing Plan Milestone 1 – Begin on the Notice to Proceed, Est. of $12 million 1) Clear and grub from Wilson Blvd. to east end of the Project. 2) Provide fill, where necessary, along the proposed FPL route for early relocation of overhead lines. 3) Begin road construction at 43`d Avenue and continue to Wilson Blvd. Complete all roadwork, including signals and lighting, except for the thermoplastic. 4) Milestone 1 shall be substantially completed in 548 days and final completedin 578 days. If the Contractor fails to complete this phase of work within the time period, the Owner shall be entitled to assess, as liquidated damages, but not as a penalty, five thousand two- hundred forty and 78/100 dollars ($5,240.78) for each calendar day thereafter until substantial completion achieved or one thousand seven hundred sixteen and 93/100 dollars ($1,716.93) until final completion is obtained. 5) This Milestone shall be Final completed in 578 days of the Notice to Proceed. Milestone 2 – Begin in 60 days from the Notice to Proceed. 1) Clear and grub from Wilson Boulevard to Collier Boulevard. 2) Provide fill, where necessary, along the proposed FPL route for early relocation of overhead lines. 3) Construct all independent culvert crossings, including the wildlife crossing. AGENDA iT M No.— -1 u gj JAN 13 2004 pg. 4) Complete this milestone in 150 days of the Notice to Proceed. If the Contractor fails to complete this phase of work within the time period, the owner shall be entitled to assess, as liquidated damages, but not as a penalty, one thousand two hundred eighty -eight and 88/100 ($1,288.88) for each calendar day thereafter until completed. Milestone 3 — Begin in 548 days of the Notice to Proceed. Est. $10 million 1) Begin road construction at Wilson Blvd. and continue to Rivers Road. Complete all roadwork except thermoplastic. 2) Milestone 3 shall be substantially completed in 1004 days. If the Contractor fails to complete this phase of work within the time period, the Owner shall be entitled to assess, as liquidated damages, but not as a penalty, five thousand two- hundred forty and 78/100 dollars ($5,240.78) for each calendar day thereafter until completion of substantial as achieved or one thousand seven hundred sixteen and 93/100 dollars ($1,716.93) until final completion is obtained. 3) This Milestone shall be Final completed in 1034 Milestone 3 shall be substantially completed in 1004 days of the Notice to Proceed and final in 1034 days from the Notice to Proceed. Milestone 4 — Begin in 1004 days of the Notice to Proceed. 1) Complete road construction Project to Collier Blvd., except for thermoplastic. 2) Project shall be substantially completed in 1460 days of the Notice to Proceed and final completed in 1490 days. If the Contractor fails this milestone within the time period, the Owner shall be entitled to assess, as liquidated damages, but not as a penalty, five thousand two- hundred forty and 78/100 dollars ($5,240.78) for each calendar day thereafter until completion of substantial is achieved or one thousand seven hundred sixteen and 93/100 dollars ($1,716.93) until final completion is obtained. Liquidated damages for the Milestones are independent of each other. Wes Tanner, Vice President Date APAC — Southeast, Inc. AGENDA f 1 M o jN — JAN 13 2GG4 Pg OE O Z ° W 10 0 o Oc ui Ia ou Z Q V W Z E7 'C O m � V L U � m W L o W 0, . c7 cc, v 000 'E b .Yom dZN 0w < E oz m t�v E zOao s 00O c 0 co , u e Z .9 WF O O O C c ° 0 0— m0 - 0C c 0D 'O u c O O. N a s U s 3 u' E c O N '3 U E `u aC E 0 d- bo O 'l7 .fl 'C C co w c .c. N 3 ar V v �L E u T ea . 0. H 0 .i O C ° '.. 06 2 V 5 W .0 L < 0 o V c as a C V r� =yE E w o Q ;. V a ° U � b a! m a O N O O O O O CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o « aC r o O m A O O o w atl CO r co a to Iri co 6 f ! o to cD in C) CD N co _o o O t0 C O N V !� l7 In b n OD W) aD O in tD C In C-4 In w v O u� Itt goo s7 'Q 7 C Q H N N H N H N H N H H N H H H H W pp O IN[1 S O O pN S pp O O p S 0 0 Soolga O O O to 0 CDO S O S S S S S S . ul) 0 0 a 0 « C Itf 1- OCp CSHSNO►OS CtCpp . S . aO SaDQ @i 0 on O�aPN cc cV 0ti eo aD .0 hOCY QhrO�O NUf aG w0 Qrnfi O SOioqe co IT C000 N m °N K1 In OD l7 N tD N'Q V R OWAY 1+ " rlf 40 m a0o VO C O)OsO N rr r►�tDH rrO/ �In Nao rIl'>aIn m r'f W OQDOOrt7 0 v 0 Or aD n tD -�In hN tp r-r a0o Ylnrrl�l y� to t71. In mW a00 l'INNr V fr a0 rt7 f7 �OOf t7 t7 � O In tD WaO V Olno rrt7 sqr� rr rr t7C7 NN < H N 400, 44 N N H H H N H H H N N H H N N OINti90DD8p vmaODI—OR 7OQNi r:OP Ca "it -tc! W10!l+ bmmS1p 0!0°0 17 CRC! 0 00 mi tNV P. i�:rr r�: aD rN n n o o ci NtY t1iOr C7 e7 Oi c7 o '�t O In r fD t- f�1�CAO�c'1 mw 0mmnr V Tr N r No 000 S <A ° to at1 I�tOO r r r Z a N O o m H N H N N H H N H H N -(U 8, U. U- JH U- U- J - JJJU8 J U-1 J J JN JN J - i Q Q a Z5 W NNJJU O S pp O O pO 88 pppp pppp ppO ppO pppp pqpq pppp pppp pppp pqpq ppO O pppp pppp O O SS oopp O pQpQ O Op O SS O pppp O O 5S O 0 S 0 S 0 0 0 S p 0p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C •. O rO p O O C O O O O O p SpOSp O p O p O 0 O 0 O SSSOtS O O O O g p S1nSOOSaD O O O 0 O 0 0 00 OaD 0 COS 0 0 OO o'a to rsn t� /� 4'f rl h N �O IA In00' vo 00'r -O t- Qr In h/717rr NNNN rQS Y V OO q 7 OOOO In In sV� t7 aO M cD M ^C4 r r V ROO V V OJ OS fa Corr r r N Nrrr r O O O O O O O O S O O S O O O O O O O O O O r O O o00 O O $ O 8 O S o . 0 o O 0 o w 0 OD 0 o o o O In r O r: In O r- In V O O o n Ol 0 In In c7 o r N N W V In C O co N f` V O V Of m •' r N tO to l7 2 (y O O 0 0 O S O O O 0 S r r o O to o O 0 O O o to O CA o In O O o O 0 aD o co g O O n _ t- n t- N Il') w O O n j h t7 r N Cl! N r 0 V In C NO O co C4 V O V 0 0 r N W /0 In C'71 r 00 tD tD s a {h{pp U 1�Ipp fJ N N p c co s a s c I- '7± s a 0�C.� D f s s N� s s aC�oi0 t a �ci:itcOi� z s s W W OZ s NC 7 z NV s IC OD s CC D D z N � -vr -vVNc0 - - - - - - C C C C C < It E 0 0 _ _ _ _ v v o 3 >> 0 D 0 0 m m J J :N�f : vtD cr � < ac 0 o C o C Re r S° r m -- o r h r -- C C > a � � oi5'GAO'D � C r C C �p 0 � {p tIi c O cam o m •� m ° Ia m ° Ia 0 (S c ft if cNyVUUUUUUUUC�UUUUUU o « 7 7 7 > > > 7 7 7 9 7 7 � 7 7 > > UU�v�� _ coo C C C C co C a oho "� CC ox co G�(7f> c WWWWW oo »a Edudddddddddts I'lligilCL iL ° wm— �cccccc��c UUUVUC)c)U8008 rz CCcCcO° aa�� (bcooWWI- F- 000ow �aD�O a < < t7 aD a WOO.r.yp a < rNNlyh QQ lsh� N Nc7 e7 O NNNNt7 torn W t7 t7 t71'7 �j 4.4 O E : <_ Y 4 �4 r4 It rrt7 ,,}} r a s o, d ti O�iR S qW t3 � Z O o o0o00 N N N N to tO r ubMf W N CO N o V alnd%aaoa o �? _ Q O C) V t7 V M 'R CI st C7 -) th t7 m m M 17 t7 't V C �� JA►1(41IJ04 JUL 2 9 2003 pa--5— f - C) 0 0 0 0 co) o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o In N o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 o O O O In o ao m N o O o I[I .n N o IA 0 u7 O CD N .O .� M W O N O IL1 On O u) O W CO C O u1 W O m CO O W CD Q M O A CD N M N M W O A W N M W M Q V. f` ►� W O tD u) h E �p M < vD v m m M m n � o ' yI o A 7 H H N H H H *111 N 1 N N N H H H N H H H H O O O O Q O O O O O O O O co r c0 M CO O O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 h 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O o O IO N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Iq A O O M O OIO O O hhIp O ��++ CGChO N OCCIA wNle V ONO.oI 0a 00 In N m 10u)`00 N N CD h 0IOOIOOt�om" m'7 AOW O W C 0 O In C V O 04 O.- to A 00 tO go CO CD CD 40t- OA ON bNr a W It M7A0 M00 co <WCDrCO V r— u') CP WMOAO CV IDAO W �trOMtO W W) CO N re�'CDYrrrCD --OOF1 CD rCOW W OA tI. W <YOOIO M IO C6 Ili MY•0 W Opt V �11YW W.O CD N MIO In V ttM r W WNMCWD WI'7MNN��OO V <aNnO�i .O IO C NN rNW r 00 N A rrNNMMMM�t Ip I[ tOm C N N v E Q Q N N! 44 &4.4 "1091" V1 V! "1"1401160.11,64 H H f! N H H N N H H H H H H HH O OOO000 C. OOOto Of CD COrO O ID W C> OA in O O.O 0to10000000 CO N O 000000W OO O O InO A 00 O OO M CO IOOOou)O CO CIR q O MhN O IOOIO CO OmNO InO ' OOOOOOOC! 01{j W 1q IOOOOIAO V CD CDWOOhW ui0 WO�tOOIpOhOrM m O O 000 c7K V IOO Y CD CD CD CO r W MM W CD O Ip A '00) r O MOO V WO�t CO NCDr ti.0 AA W W O O NN NNNMCNO C'OO�CV ��bCOQI[�OONMNN CID A O r r N M M' t I U W N N O l M N N N O. r r r N _M N H fy N N N N H N N N N N H NQQ N H N H N H H N H N N4 H N N H N N N N N H H H H N H H N N H N H N U. U. Q jJ.LLJ J J LL LL. Q W Q W 4 W W QN WLiJ q Q LLIW q a W W W J J J J J J J J J J J J�Z- -Z = W� W W W W WQQW W O O O S O O O O O O O p O O O O O O p ON O O O S O O O pp 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O CV O O O S O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 r r r - N O O O O O O O O O O w m m 0 r r N N M M l O f u) h O O W W Q V M I O C D C O T+ E r r O O :" v N N V v C J' C7 Q 00 00 o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O O 00 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 ' 0 0 , 0 , 0 0 ' 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o C4 M , O , O • IO w 0 0 !� N' W' N O, O o, W O Y O W O CO m W N M M N m V N V :+ M C C O 7 ZO 00 00 00 °o °0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0' 0 , 0 o I O 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 O I O O I O IC% I , m' O' 0 r A N' N W N' O O' O O' co W N M I[6 M N •' O r O W Y O CO O M M C O � � 7 00 N H M M N 0s0 rrMM z0 OD M M a ° Cal ° �oaa O O c'ccc 0 0 0 0, J a ° n r °° ° n iO tD ZO iD iD "cO co _ io m m a_ a aaaa Q Q U U O U O U o MM r C C C C 3 3 C C CUU o 0 fV OD co Qz 00 CD O C C z mDOrrMMCa�Cti iOmmfOrr .iS C C O O O 0... ... C C ieh �" __ aaaa U. U. 'O p "QQ ppV'p�v c c c c c c 9 c OOY w CD Q to a a a m C c c C m U U U U U U UU -a-5 ID o C 0 C 0 C 0 C O O » v C C 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 X X> > w 0 0 0 <10 0 aoo o W° paso .5 .5 so 00 oo to m Q p yo°(?(?%mao� C C C C -, cc c c c c c 4D W 0 i 0 Q J <10 U o N LL 75 a 7 a O f a ° a ° MUM °° c 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 C7 H y� M O I-' p.0 `•- a w w. 40oo 0 0 0 0 z z 7� "f >> E E E E E E E LL U. LL aafY0.0.0.' 7 O O o O O OfnN��MM s CDC- - -o z z m- -� � ��QQQQ -� b I/ Q 0 E ECty a8 Ci3 �.O at3 --- Cif --- LL LL c (n(�(nlnNVIN O b O Or ° La A W.-r MM 0 mm 0 O O o 0 0 o p a aLLLLLLLL �, IL LL LL U. LL U.a6LLU- LL LL— LL d 0. o f.wwWwwwW(9(7UV0 c c c c ° ° > >� ac�c�c�c� O0000 >>>>vvg� c c (9C1d0.GC1 W > > W a 0000�� wQQOac�000iLCL » » »--- - - -nla o� n o m °o o c o `O �w o 04~ w° U °° 'CT `tT co U' U' ° Y 1O> >°° j LN 6�N - o - 0 -- 0 o000.LLaa0.0.000000 p O O O O O 2,01M O o �U V—�j iM iMV Q 0 O O C.)0 O O D000�� O A �p N r- NON r > > 10 > > > >QQQQmm .mob r. O — d ._---- ddLLdddda0.ad ._ - - -.-- LL. ,Z-' lL Q W C) OQi C) M Ia')m�MMCO�mCQO .- C>0C Q -3 Q C�M��`TY QaD CQD _m�XxeO C2 QN cl. YY MrQi V MM Q COW Qo0101D r— - -r ID (D Q�NNNr� , - = NNr NN tD m In u)t7�•�•� 1�t� V ° NNNN{N mN NCD I NfV N '4 C0 00 W Q CO W W W Q W W f: AAr� I I r m t0 r CD t0 NNNIn t0 ID ��. -rrr� rNNNN CO CO CO r as r r MMIO r to I MIDr rrrrrr• I rin lil In -r O Msf 0 E W o0oo60ommC)CYl W W W CO rn� W TT W W In InI�u; A1� 000000lD0r-r�nrnA rnrz Ann r- 0000000000o0000r oo0r °1�m Z c7MMMMMMW V d V W W W W W W W NNNNMMMMMM u) O u) h h- r` r f• f` r I'") n M00000 f` r OO T� r JAgf 13� JUL 2 ° 2033 Pg 7 _ No._ _la-01 JAN 13 2004 o. v JUL 20 e 03 9 00 00 00 °o 00 w M M .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 «e o! COi � N N cO) N N p 7 Y t" .o N 0 0 0 S O O O O O O O O O O O g Q vv OO O c� b .. O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 Co 0 0 uO U) 1A W) If) (M A C °N 00000'7" OC�O r-ONN W) V On O'7 W nN07f r- N W) T f9 �' �ORI+C�NCD a0 aph tD V CD Q' h0 t7 NN v M 3 O �lh�n�Ci Q Q N y N y N 44 N Y► "1" 401 V►M► N °0000,00000oo$$bggsgoa 000 O m O W) N oo W '7 �A m 6mi6164 N 0 f- t- �- r V C>O C� OIL. -c7 CD nNnel Go co 1-- co eh - O - N W N c0 re'� N c7 to h N N Z Q M � C NH N N N 400 44 NN m '� QN W [[ QNN co QN p 8 p 8 p 8 0 0 0 MEMO 0 0 pppp 0 pppp 0 Sp 0 p8 0 pppp 0 0 � ctl " C OONfV C7 t O a� Q Q ~ 1 9 1 1 0 0 00 o 8 $ 00 C r N C O0 C A O 7 Z Q 0 0 o g Q C •' C O O 0 Q Z r ZD r ZD ED M s z 1 .5 .5 16 c c c ° e6 O 1- Y»l O h O h a Q e co W N N p a O a O a O a O h e a e a e a O p C C » C C W W Lis ao��o u m °° oUUC)UG c c ro =w Q cnv�inu'�m °m °m °m °c°�t�f= F�Lica) Ro ` ° NN2lh N N V V 14 f V N N NNNN�l7 N N r .0 o!.c?(R r ornrnac,rn 1w E �inir��nu��nNin�nco� z' No._ _la-01 JAN 13 2004 o. v JUL 20 e 03 9 �SHLANI�„ APAC- Southeast, Inc. A subsidiary of Ashland Paving And Cunstructiun, Inc Southern Florida Division January 7, 2004 14299 Alico Road Ft Myers, FL 33913 Tel: 239 267 -7767, Fax 239 267 -1336 www.apac.com Gregg Strakaluse, P -E., Director Collier County Transportation/ECM 2675 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: APAC- Southeast Dear Gregg: Pursuant to our meeting this afternoon, please accept the following in reference to the apparent confusion caused by our recent merger and name change. 1. I am an officer with signatory authority of APAC— Southeast 2. I was an officer with signatory authority of former APAC - Florida. 3. APAC - Florida was incorrectly identified as APAC- Florida, a Florida corporation on previous documents. 4. There is not now nor ever has been an APAC - Florida, a Florida corporation. 5. Any reference to APAC - Florida, a Florida corporation in previous documents is a scriveners error and should have con -ectly referred to APAC - Florida as a Delaware corporation. 6. APAC - Florida has merged into APAC - Southeast, a Georgia corporation. 7. Any document subsequent to the merger should have referred to APAC - Southeast I hope this clears up any misunderstanding. Very truly yours, N"- J6-4-9 � Wes Tanner Vice President AGEN ,ITEM No. JAN 13122004 pa J HIV 16 ( ' 04 Fy7. 04 r K Hr'HU �J7 Gb( 1JJ0 1 7((47J(U p WER OF ATTORNEY - 2004 Power of Attorney executed by APAC- Southeast, Inc., (the "Company' ), relative to its operations. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, pursuant to the authority granted in resolutions adopted by its Board of Directors on October 1, 1981, the Company, acting by and through its duly es elected and qualified President, Frank D. Nichols, Jr., does hereby authorize to the ollowi i .tr here in t and grants the following authority to the persons herein designated, subject forth, as follows: A. DEFINITIONS The following terms shall have the indicated meanings in this Power of Attorney: The Company shall mean APAC - Southeast, Inc., a Georgia corporation, which includes es of the business operations of the Company conducted under and by, and the assets and properties Company managed by, the various units and divisions whose trade names are hereinafter generally described. Contract Documents shall mean any and all bids, proposals, agreements, instruments, contracts, bonds, releases, satisfactions, labor and payroll affidavits and enrep final periodic and final I estimates, consents to the releases of retained percentage arequisite d the to the implementation of any of other documents, writings, consents or reports necessary the foregoing documents herein defined that shall be related to, connected with or arise out of the regular and ordinary business activities of the company. Offlcers shall mean persons from time -to -time designated by the Company as such officers of the Company. Authorised Em Io ees and Assi Cant Secretaries shall mean persons designated from time to time as such by the Company or by any two Officers as hereinafter set forth- B. AUTHORIZED TRADE NAMES The activities and operations of the Company may be carried on in any of the following manners or styles as may from time -to -time be deemed necessary or appropriate: Alabama Division, APACSoutheast, Inc. Ballenger Paving Division, APACSoutheast, Inc. Central Florida Division, APAC - Southeast, Inc. First Cost Division, APAC - Southeast, Inc. Georgia Division, APACSoutheast, Inc. Gulf Coast Division, APACSoutheast, Inc. MacDougald Construction Division, APACSoutheast. Inc. Miami Crushed Rock, APACSoutheast, Ina Southern Florida Division, APACSoutheast, Inc. No.— ,� 131-1 JAN I 2� n_ SOUTHERN FL DI J i"11`4 ')( e114 rR 1--r -",. CJJ CVl 1JJV C. AUTHORIZED ATTORNEYS I. OFF ICERS s are hereby designated OFFICERS of the Company and are The following person hereby made, constituted and appointed the true and lawful attorneys of l p ace and in the matters and subject to the limitations hereinafter set forth, to act in its name, p hereinafter mentioned' No. rJ �,Qj �J" _ JAN 13 �4�i OFFICE: NAME: Frank D. Nichols, Jr. President Vice president/Asst. Secretary Ronald C. Ashmore Vice president/Asst- Secretary John P. Bamngton Vice President/Asst. Secretary Keith R. Faust Vice President/Asst- Secretary Donald K. Holley Vice president/Asst. Secretary Frank A. Maines Vice President/Asst. Secretary Natale A. Marini Vice President/Asst_ Secretary John P. McAleer 111 Vice President/Asst. Secretary Robert W_ McCord Vice President/Asst. Secretary M- Lee Powell 111 Vice President/Asst. Secretary Gary W. Rohrer Vice President/Asst. Secretary Robert B. Royal Vice PresidentlAsst. Secretary Robert W. Thompson, Jr. Vice President/Asst. Secretary J- James Wiley III Peter W. Onuschak Secretary/Treasurer Asst. Secretary/Asst. Treasurer C. Scott Childers Asst. SecretarylAsst, Treasurer Richard S. Stiles Vice President/Asst. Secretary Steven C. Ayers Vice President/Asst. Secretary Gregory P- Baler Vice President/Asst. Secretary Christopher L Brunais Vice President/Asst. Secretary Peter L. Capp Vice President/Asst. Secretary Church David M. C urch Vice President/Asst. Secretary Douglas Vice PresidenVAsst. Secretary David A. Donofrio Vice President/Asst. Secretary Holcomb Scott M. H olcomtter Vice President/AssL Secretary Kevin R. Vice President/Asst. Secretary Mark S. Marine Vice President/Asst. Secretary Paul W_ Miller, Jr. Vice PresidentlAsst. Secretary B. Morton Myrick Vice president/Asst. Secretary John D. Parker Vice President/Asst. Secretary Tunstall B. Perry IV Vice President/Asst Secretary Lucious F. Rollins Vice President/Asst- Secretary James A. Strain. Jr. vice Presidenf/Asst. Secretary Wesley U. Tanner Vice President/Asst. Secretary William H. Wilfong Asst. Secretary/Asst. Treasurer Robert Delisle Asst, Secretary/Asst- Treasurer Jennifer K. Edwards Asst_ Secretary/Asst. Treasurer Paul J. Guptill Asst. SecretarylAsst. Treasurer Dawn L. Kelly -Wall Asst- SecxetarylAsst. Treasurer th C. Laing Kennet Vice President/Asst. Secretary Harry Curtin Vice President/Asst. Secretary David L. Berlin Vice President/Asst. Secretary Dam W Head. Jr. Vice President/Asst. Secretary Hendrix Rodney L. Hendrix Vice President/Asst. Secretary L. J Jeffery L. Vice President/Asst. Secretary Timothy Mullendore - Muf leee Vice President/Asst. Secretary David M- Secretary R. Glenn Phillips Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vim Thomas G. Pigg Asst. Secretary/Asst. Treasurer Michael R. Halpin No. rJ �,Qj �J" _ JAN 13 �4�i The following persons are hereby designated OFFICERS solely for the purposes of executing and attesting various corporate documents, tax returns, affidavits, and similar such instruments as may be necessary from time to time: Jerome M. Colvin Paul S. Meyer M. Ray Pace Jami K. Suver William D. Miller Robert J. Allen Joseph R_Broce John V. Connolly Brian D. Menshouse Stephanie B. Stitt Michael F_ Deaton David C. Lewis Deborah L. Murphey David M. To01an 11_ AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES Vice President/ASSt. Secretary Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vice Presider►UAsst. Secretary Vice President/Asat Secretary Vice President/General Counsel/Asst. Secretary Deputy Treas. /Asst Treas_ /Asst. Secretary Deputy Treas. /Asst. Treas. /Asst. Secretary Deputy Treas. /Asst. Treas /Asst. Secretary Deputy Treas. /Asst Treas /Asst. Secretary Deputy TreasJASst. Treas. /Asst. Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary The following persons are hereby designated AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES of the Company and all are hereby made, constituted and appointed the true and lawful attorneys of the Company for the purposes and subject to the limitation hereinafter set forth, to act in Its name, place and stead in the said state or states set after his or her name below: NAME: STATE OR STATES WHERE AUTHORIZED: Charles L. Boyd Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Lowell N. Barden, Jr. Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia , West Virginia Evan C. Bryant Alabama, Arkansas, Florida. Georgia. Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia , West Virginia Harry A. Cassarino Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia , West Virginia Bradley K. Dye Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri. North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Michael B. Edwards Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia . West Virginia Vinson E. Gammage Alabama, Arkansas. Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri. North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia James A_ Jones, Jr. Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Todd J. Ketner Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Daniel T. Krisman Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma. South Carolina. Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Sven Krollpfeiffer Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia John T_ McBrayer Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Grant G. Peterson Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri. North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee_, EIVi Texas, Virginia, West Virginia AGEN� No.— 1 a JAN 13 206 pg. Robert D_ Spillman Wesley W. Whitfield Matthew A. Phillips Byrne W. Stewart III Ricky O. Cross Charles C. Lovoy Jerry L. Crisp John J. Davis William G. Pass Jeffrey P. Bradshaw Anita M_ Billingsley Jerry Ray Doss Roy F. Atchley Joshua S. Chandler Thomas L. Jackson Justin B Griggs Timothy B. Mayhall Charlotte S. Garvin R. Delane Hartzog John W. Taylor Snan W. Davidson Robert W. Ketron Timothy J. McLaughlin Andres C. Obrador William C. Shelor Philip D. Stiffler David L. Wilson Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri. North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee. Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Alabama, Georgia, Florida Alabama, Georgia, Florida Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee Alabama, Florida Alabama, Florida Alabama, Florida Alabama, Georgia Alabama, Georgia Alabama, Georgia Alabama, Tennessee Alabama, Tennessee Alabama, Tennessee Alabama, Tennessee Alabama, Tennessee Alabama Alabama Florida, Georgia, South Carolina Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida III. ASSISTANT SECRETARIES Any and all Contract Documents of the Company which may be signed or executed pursuant to the powers of attorney herein granted to the Officers and Authorized Employees hereinbefore named may be attested on behalf of the Company and the Company's corporate seal may be affixed thereto by any one of the following named persons, each of whom is hereby designated an ASSISTANT SECRETARY of the Company only in the said state or states set after his or her name for the limited purposes stated herein: NAME: STATE OR STATES WHERE AUTHORIZED; Charles J Blinne Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Charles L. Boyd Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Harry A_ Cassarino Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Michael B. Edwards Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana. Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee. Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Jorge Garcia Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Sherry A. Jones Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia. West Virginia Todd J. Ketner Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia AGENDAITEM No._� — < JAN 13 204 Pg, � J"14 Cif Uti VJ7•l'JU rf[ f'lrrll- G1J7 GOf 1JJ0 IU 7( f'-17J fCJ r.uf/ 1,4 Nancy A. K. Pendleton Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Grant G. Peterson Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Judith M. Rickenbaker Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Pamelia M. Sahr Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Karen B Sigg Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Cynthia J_ Sisk Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Robert D. Spillman Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Penny F. Wilson Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia Matthew A. Phillips Alabama, Florida, Georgia Byme W. Stewart III Alabama, Florida, Georgia Ricky D. Cross Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee Charles C. Lovoy Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee John J. Davis Alabama, Florida William G. Pass Alabama, Florida Jeffrey P. Bradshaw Alabama, Georgia Anita M. Billingsley Alabama, Georgia Jerry Ray Doss Alabama, Georgia Roy F. Atchley Alabama, Tennessee Joshua S. Chandler Alabama, Tennessee Thomas L- Jackson Alabama, Tennessee Justin B. Griggs Alabama, Tennessee Charles C. Lovoy Alabama, Tennessee Timothy B. Mayhall Alabama, Tennessee Chariotte S. Garvin Alabama R. Delane Hartzog Alabama Turban L. Moore Alabama Roy A. Mullendore Alabama Steven M. Gracheck Florida, Georgia, South Carolina Tracy S. Maloney Florida, Georgia, South Carolina Karen M. Ritchie Florida, Georgia, South Carolina Donald J. Carter Florida Maria V_ Casares Florida Bernie J. Caulfield Florida Lisa S. Haber Florida Cynthia L. Hall Florida G. Michael Johnson Florida Craig E. Ketron, Jr. Florida Robert D. King Florida Hector Louzao Florida Daniel B. Mathews Florida Angelia L. McElroy Florida Thomas 0_ McPhail Florida Michael T. Nichols Florida Ercelle C. Simpson Florida James H. Stem Florida Patrick A. Thrasher Florida IIT ryl�" Nc� 1�� t- JAN 13 20 5 Pg. �J Jh1lY l'J I Cl`i CJJ• CJU I I� rill I �� -- -- D. EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. OFFICERS Each of the Officers hereinbefore named is hereby given and granted the right, power, and authority to sign, execute and deliver on behalf of the Company any and all Contract Documents and each of said attorneys on behalf of the Company may do all other acts and things requisite or necessary in respect of the signing, execution or delivery thereof, and all that its said attorneys, and each of them, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of the authority and power herein granted is hereby ratified and confirmed by the Company. 11. AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES Each Authorized Employee hereinbefore named is hereby given and granted the right, power and authority to sign, execute and deliver on behalf of the Company any and all Contract Documents relative to the offering to perform or the performance of work anywhere within the state or states opposite his or her name as aforesaid and said attorneys on behalf of the Company may do all other acts and things requisite or necessary in respect of the signing, execution or delivery thereof; and all that its said attorneys, and each of them, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of the authority herein granted is hereby ratified and confirmed by the Company. Ilt, CHANGE IN AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES & ASSISTANT SECRETARIES Any two of the aforesaid Officers acting together may from time -to -time grant further powers of attorney designating any person or persons in the employ of the Company as an Authorized or Assistant Secretary and may at any time withdraw from any Authorized Lmployee Or Assistant Secretary the designation as such, with or without cause, and such person shall thereafter no longer have the authority of an Authorized Employee or Assistant Secretary under this instrument. Said Officers may also in connection with the granting or withdrawing of the designation of an Authorized Employee or Assistant Secretary from time -to -time add to the lists of Authorized Employees and Assistant Secretaries on this instrument the names of those employees granted such designation and delete from such list the names of those whose designation has been withdrawn IV. ADDITIONAL LIMITED POWERS OF ATTORNEY Any two Officers acting together are hereby made, constituted and appointed the true and lawful attorneys of the Company for the purpose of granting further powers of attorney authorizing any person or persons in the employ of the Company to execute Contract Documents on behalf of the Company; provided, however, that such further power of attorney shall set forth the state or states within which such attomey is authorized to contract. E. BINDING EFFECT Any and all of the aforesaid Contract Documents and all other documents styled, executed and attested pursuant to the authority hereinbefore granted shall be valid, lawful and binding upon the Company in accordance with the terms and conditions of the document or documents so executed and attested; provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall authorize any person authorized to act hereunder to underwrite, warrant, endorse, or guarantee the debt, performance, obligation or any other undertaking of any kind or description of any third party or parties. The Power of Attorney and authority hereby granted and confirmed upon the said Officers, Authorized Employees and Assistant Secretaries shall continue in full force and effect through December 31, 2004. ACEhIC2t4 iTnti - �- No.�(� ' JAN `1JV�'� 8 � pg. _I J HN U ( '04 by : bb F- K HF'HU Sy Zb ( 1,5-5b 1U , J. (, (4 J.3 0A r. Fly/ 14 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its President and attested to by its Secretary/Treasurer, and its Corporate Seal to be hereto affixed, effective the 21 day of November 2003. ATTEST: Frank D. Nichols, Preside State of Georgia SS: County of Cherokee P ter W. Oncischak, Secreta ylTireasurer [Corporate Seal? Be it remembered that I, Penny F. Wilson, a Notary Public duly qualified, commissioned, sworn and acting in and for the county and state aforesaid, hereby certify that on this day of November 2003, there personally appeared before me, Frank 0. Nichols, Jr., President of the Company, and Peter W. Onuschak, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, and each, personally known to me to be that person and designated Officer of the Company who signed said instrument on behalf of said corporation and being by me duly sworn, did acknowledge and say to me that he did so sign, seal and deliver said instrument in the name and on behalf of said corporation as such designated Officer, that the same is the free and voluntary act and deed as such designated Officer and the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the consideration, uses and purposes therein mentioned. that he is duly authorized thereunto by the Board of Directors of such corporation, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of such corporation. IN TESYIMO Y WHEREOF, I have hereu set my hand and official notarial seal in the County of Cobb, this day of November 2003. Penny F. Wilso , otary Pub Fc My Commission pires: July 18, 2006 [Notary Seal] AGENDA IT- _T No. t.Q JAN 13 205h Pg. JHIV U r YJ'i VJ7• VO r r\ mi rim. POWER OF ATTORNEY - 2003 Power of Att orney executed by APAC - Florida, Inc., (the "Company "), relative to its operations. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That, pursuant to the authority granted in resolutions adopted by its Board of Directors on October 2, 1981, the Company, acting by and through its duly elected and qualified President, David A. Donofrio, does hereby authorize the following trade names and grants the following authority to the persons herein designated, subject to the limitations herein set forth, as follows: A. DEFINITIONS The following terms shall have the indicated meanings in this Power of Attorney: The Company shall mean APAC- Florida, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which includes business operations of the Company conducted under and by, and the assets and properties of the Company managed by, the various units and divisions whose trade names are hereinafter generally described. Contract Documents shall mean any and all bids, proposals, agreements, instruments, contracts, bonds, releases, satisfactions, labor and payroll affidavits and reports, periodic and final estimates, consents to the releases of retained percentages and the payment of final estimates, and all other documents, writings, consents or reports necessary or requisite to the implementation of any of the foregoing documents herein defined that shall be related to, connected with or arise out of the regular and ordinary business activities of the Company. Officers shall mean persons from time -to -time designated by the Company as such officers of the Company. Authorized Employees and Assistant Secretaries shall mean persons designated from time to time as such by the Company or by any two Officers as hereinafter set forth. B. AUTHORIZED TRADE NAMES The activities and operations of the Company may be carried on in any of the following manners or styles as may from time -to -time be deemed necessary or appropriate Central Florida Division, APAC - Florida, Inc.; First Coast Division, APAC- Florida, Inc.; Gulf Coast Division, APAC - Florida, Inc.; Jacksonville Division, APAC - Florida, Inc.; Miami Crushed Rock, a Division of APAC - Florida, Inc.; North Florida Division, APAC - Florida, Inc.; Pan American Construction, a Division of APAC - Florida, Inc.; Pan American Division, APAC - Florida, Inc; Sarasota Division, APAC- Florida, Inc.; and Southern Florida Division, APAC - Florida, Inc. AGENC&IT -M r + No._ IL I JAN 13 Lvv i J "1 %4 VJ f 1014 VJ:; - U f r IC "r-""- I. OFFICERS GJ7 GO I 1JJU I U J I 1'-�lU I V C. AUTHORIZED ATTORNEYS The following persons are hereby designated OFFICERS of the Company and are hereby made, constituted and appointed the true and lawful attorneys of the Company for the purposes and subject to the limitations hereinafter set forth, to act in its name, place and stead in the matters hereinafter mentioned: NAME: David A. Donofrio Steven C. Ayers Gregory P_ Baier Peter L. Capp David M. Church Douglas A. Conley Raymond K. Curtis Pamela M. Jones Kevin R. Leadbetter Mark S. Marine William E. Merritt Paul W. Miller, Jr. B. Morton Myrick John D. Parker Bryan V. Peacock Tunstali B. Perry IV Lucious F. Rollins James A. Strain, Jr. Wesley U. Tanner Robert W. Thompson, Jr Gregory R. Umbaugh Kenneth C. Laing Robert Delisle Harry J. Ebener, Jr. Jennifer K. Edwards Paul J. Guptill Dawn L. Kelly -Wall OFFICE: President Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vice President/Asst Secretary Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vice President/Asst- Secretary Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vice PresidentAsst. Secretary Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vice President/Asst Secretary Vice President/Asst - Secretary Vice PresidenUAsst. Secretary Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vice President/Asst Secretary Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vice President/Asst. Secretary Vice President/Asst Secretary Vice President/Asst. Secretary Secretary/Treasurer Asst. Secretary/Asst. Treasurer Asst. Secretary/Asst. Treasurer Asst. Secretary/Asst. Treasurer Asst. Secretary/Asst. Treasurer Asst. Secretary/Asst. Treasurer The following person are hereby designated OFFICERS solely for the purposes of executing and attesting various corporate documents, tax returns, affidavits, and similar such instruments as may be necessary from time to time: T. Cody Wales Vice President/Asst Secretary Richard P. Thomas Vice President/Asst. Secretary Richard A. Jones Vice PresidenUAsst. Secretary Paul S. Meyer Vice President/General Counsel/Asst. Secretary William B. Miller Vice President/Asst. Secretary M. Ray Pace Vice President/Asst. Secretary Joseph R. Broce Deputy Treas. /Asst. Treas. /Asst. Secretary Brian D. Menshouse Deputy Treas. /Asst, Treas. /Asst Secretary Robert J. Allen Deputy Treas. /Asst Treas. /Asst. Secretary John V. Connolly Deputy Treas. /Asst. Treas /Asst Secretary Michael F. Deaton Assistant Secretary Deborah L. Murphey Assistant Secretary David C. Lewis Assistant Secretary David M. Toolan Assistant Secretary �. No.lU1�� JAN 13 '2004 pg. JHN 0 ( '04 O'J: U ( F-K WHl c J� 2b( 1,5Jb 11-1 'J ((4'J,5 (4A r. 1 -1/ 14 1111. AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES The following persons are hereby designated AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES of the Company and all are hereby made, constituted and appointed the true and lawful attorneys of the Company for the purposes and subject to the limitation hereinafter set forth, to act in its name, place and stead in the said state or states set after his or her name below: NAME: Brian W. Davidson Robert D. Edwards Scott M. Holcomb Robert W.Ketron Timothy J. McLaughlin Andres C. Obrador David L. Wilson Grant G. Peterson III. ASSISTANT SECRETARIES STATE OR STATES WHERE AUTHORIZED: Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida, Georgia, South Carolina Any and all Contract Documents of the Company which may be signed or executed pursuant to the powers of attorney herein granted to the Officers and Authorized Employees hereinbefore named may be attested on behalf of the Company and the Company's corporate seal may be affixed thereto by any one of the following named persons, each of whom is hereby designated an ASSISTANT SECRETARY of the Company only in the said state or states set after his or her name for the limited purposes stated herein: NAME: Donald J. Carter Maria V. Casares Bernie J. Caulfield Curtis N. George Lisa S. Haber Cynthia L. Hall G. Michael Johnson Craig E. Ketron, Jr_ Robert D. King Hector Louzao Daniel B_ Mathews Angelia L. McElroy Thomas D. McPhail Michael T. Nichols Robert W. Powers Ercelle C. Simpson James H. Stern Patrick A. Thrasher Donna L. Vollertsen Melinda L. Lewis Karen M. Ritchie Pamelia M. Sahr OFFICERS STATE OR STATES WHERE AUTHORIZED: Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida Florida, Georgia Florida, Georgia, South Carolina Florida, Georgia, South Carolina Florida, Georgia, South Carolina D. EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS Each of the Officers hereinbefore named is hereby given and gra No. " " — JAN 13 2004 Pg. & J HN Y J ( ' Y J 4 Y J 7 • Y J ( r K H r - H l - e - J D e u I and authority to sign, execute and deliver on behalf of the Company any and all Contract Documents and each of said attomeys on behalf of the Company may do all other acts and things requisite or necessary in respect of the signing, execution or delivery thereof, and all that its said attorneys, and each of them, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of the authority and power herein granted is hereby ratified and confirmed by the Company. II. AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES Each Authorized Employee hereinbefore named is hereby given and granted the right, power and authority to sign, execute and deliver on behalf of the Company any and all Contract or Documents relative to the offering to perform or the performance of work anywhere within threw t d all states opposite his or her name as aforesaid and said attorneys on behalf of the Company y other acts and things requisite or necessary in respect of the signing, execution or delivery thereof; and all that its said attorneys, and each of them, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of the authority herein granted is hereby ratified and confirmed by the Company. {II_ PROPERTY Any two of the aforesaid Officers, acting together, may in the ordinary and regular course of business execute any and all documents affecting the title to or possession of any property having fair cash value of less than Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollar {$250,000.00) and used, held, owned or standing in the name of the Company_ IV. CHANGE IN AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES b ASSISTANT SECRETARIES Any two of the aforesaid Officers acting together may from time -to -time grant further powers of attorney designating any person or persons in the employ of the Company as an Authorized Employee or Assistant Secretary and may at any time withdraw from any Authorized Employee or Assistant Secretary the designation as such, with or without cause, and such person shall thereafter no longer have the authority of an Authorized Employee or Assistant Secretary under this instrument_ Said Officers may also in connection with the granting or withdrawing of the designation of an Authorized Employee or Assistant Secretary from time -to -time add to the lists of Authorized Employees and Assistant Secretaries on this instrument the names of those employees granted such designation and delete from such list the names of those whose designation has been withdrawn. V. ADDITIONAL LIMITED POWERS OF ATTORNEY Any two Officers acting together are hereby made, constituted and appointed the true and lawful attorneys of the Company for the purpose of granting further powers of attorney authorizing any person or persons in the employ of the Company to execute Contract Documents on behalf of the Company, provided, however, that such further power of attorney shall set forth (i) the state or states within which such attorney is authorized to contract, and (ii) the total maximum value of any Contract Document which such attorney is authorized to execute shall not exceed $100,000 for any single Contract Document_ E. BINDING EFFECT Any and all of the aforesaid Contract Documents and all other documents styled, executed and attested pursuant to the authority hereinbefore granted shall be valid, lawful and binding upon the Company in accordance with the terms and conditions of the document or documents so executed and attested: provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall authorize any person authorized to act hereunder to underwrite, warrant, endorse, or guarantee the debt, performance, obligation or any other undertaking of any kind or description of any third party or parties. The Power of Attorney and authority hereby granted and confirmed u rd said Officers, Authorized Employees and Assistant Secretaries shall continue in full force December 31, 2003 AN f 3 2004 4 _ n J HIV VJ f YJ,i VJ7 • Y o r- K "r"-,- IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its Presi�nt and attested to by its Secretary/Treasurer, and its Corporate Seal to be hereto affixed, this day of December, 2002. A- TE David A. Donofrio, Presiden State of Florida SS: County of Sarasota (- a-, a. " Kenneth C. Laing, Secre !Treasurer [Corporate Seal] Be it remembered that I, Susan E. Tharp, a Notary Public duly qualified, cqqi missioned, sworn and acting in and for the county and state aforesaid, hereby certify that on this _L3!�day of December, 2002, there personally appeared before me, David A. Donofrio, President of the Company, and Kenneth C_ Laing, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, and each, personally known to me to be that person and designated Officer of the Company who signed said instrument on behalf of said corporation and being by me duly sworn, did acknowledge and say to me that he did so sign, seal and deliver said instrument in the name and on behalf of said corporation as such designated Officer, that the same is the free and voluntary act and deed as such designated Officer and the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the consideration, uses and purposes therein mentioned; that he is duly authorized thereunto by the board of directors of such corporation; and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of such corporation. IN TESTIMONY WH REOF, I have hereunto et my hand and official notarial seal in the County of Sarasota, this 13+ day of December, 20 Susan E. Tharp, Notary Public IV My Commission Expires- October 29, 2003 [Notary Seal] Susan E. Thar ;Commtulon # CC 870402 Expiree Oct. 29, 2003 pQ Bonded Thru Atlantic Bonding Co., Inc. AGENDA ITPA No., I( '1 JAN 13 M54 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE SELECTION COMMITTEE RANKING OF FIRMS FOR CONTRACT ,-- NEGOTIATIONS FOR RFP # 04-3587-11 ENGINEERING O COUNTY BARN SERVICES FOR ROADWAY AND CAPACITY COUNTY ROAD 864 TO STATE ROAD 84", COUNTY PROJECT NO. 60101 OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board approval of the Selection Committee's ranking of firms for engineering: and design services for roadway and capacity improvements to County Barn Road from County Road 864 to State Road 84, and to obtain authorization to begin contract negotiations for subsequent Board approval of a contract. CONSIDERATIONS: Traffic growth, roadway condition and the need for drainage improvements all dictate the need for this project which is in the Transportation 5 Year Work Program for FY04. A Request for proposal (RFP) was issued to provide professional design services for this project. On October 24, 2003, the RFP was publicly advertised and the Purchasing Department sent notices to one hundred and sixty -five i'� ! firms capable of providing said services. Twenty - seven (27) firms requested full packages, and three (3) responses were received by the due date of December 5, 2003. This RFP was issued in accordance with Florida State Statute 287.055, Consultant Competitive Negotiation Act. A Selection Committee meeting was hci.l on December 16, 2003, and after review, scoring and discussion of the proposals, by consen,�l is of the Conunittee, the following firms were short - listed as follows: 1. American Consulting Enginck�r� i,r Florida, LLC 2. Pitman- Hartenstein and AssocI Inc. 3. URS Corporation With Board approval, negotiations ti•.l'. rr.rience with the top ranked firm. �FFISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal i i , ,act associated with the ranking of these firms. 0 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN: i here is no growth management impact associated with this action. RECOMMENDATION: That the 3oard of County Commissioners; (1) Approve the Committee's selection and ranking of !'Arms. (2) Authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top ranked firm. FArqPND 1=t g. SUBMITTED BY: 6V& %? '/-" Date: I J -J Y- D3 Allen R. Ruth, P.E., Senior Project Manager, TF &CM Department I REVIEWED BY: - Date: /7,- a3 Gregg R. Strakaluese, P.E., Director, TE &CM Department APPROVED BY: X_ Stephen Y APPROVED BY: Norman E im Date: I Z-ZI -43 hasing/General Services Director 11-1'��c4A ___- Date: /,? -6 AICP. Transportation Division Administrator =aC - DIN ITENA Pg. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE WORK ORDER AMENDMENT NO. 1 FOR A DECREASE OF ($33,924) TO THE CONTRACT FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION SERVICES BY KCCS FOR THE DAVIS BOULEVARD AND COLLIER BOULEVARD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 60170. OBJECTIVE: To receive Board's approval of the negotiated Work Order Amendment No. 1 for a decrease of ($33,924) to the contract for Consulting Engineering and Inspection Services by KCCS for the Davis Boulevard and Collier Boulevard Intersection Improvements. CONSIDERATION: On September 9, 2003 (item 16.13.9) the Board approved the Contract for Consulting Engineering and Inspection Services with KCCS for the Davis Boulevard and Collier Boulevard Intersection Improvements. This Work order Amendment to this Contract is necessary so as to add an additional Senior Inspector, with the reduction of other personnel. These items are outlined in the attachments. This reduction is available due to the fact that KCCS is currently running two projects simultaneously, Golden Gate Parkway and the Davis Boulevard and Collier Boulevard Intersection improvements. These items are outlined in the attachments. ISCAL IMPACT: This change will result in a decrease to the contract in the amount of ($33,924) and will be removed from the purchase order and returned to the project budget. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: "Phis Project is consistent with the Transportation Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Work Order Amendment No. 1 and authorize the Transportation Division Administrator to sign the Agreement. TEM 1 SUBMITTED BY:_�> �-- DATE: /Z e 2 03 Jarrj s Zuver, Eu0neering Inspector/Project Manager REVIEWED BY/ Z, A4 '`�'y -- -- DATE: ee2133- �43 tyndR. TMorpe, P.E., Principal Project Manager , APPROVED BY: ' — L/ DATE: /G Gregg R Strakaluse, P.E., Director, T.E.C.M. <2 APPROVED BY: Steve CarnelL Direc or, PurchasinulUeneral Services APPROVED BY: T , , 1. PC.,.,,. - E. Feder, AICP, Administrator -tation Division DATE: W DATE: d �N ITEM JAN 1 a 2004 TO: Ms. Sandi Brunker Collier County TECMD 2585 South Horseshoe Drive Suite 211 Naples, Fl. 34104 `NE ARE SENDING ORIGINALS (TRACING) LJ SEPIA TRANSPARENCIES ❑ CALCU ATICNS ❑ SKETCHES PREPARED BY THESE ARE FORWARDED: AS REQUESTED Ill P:oR: -�_P P KI_I V,HL LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 29, 2003 REF: CEI Services for Davis /Collier Intersection RFP # 00 -3184 / WO # KCS- FT- 03 -01 -A1 D HEREWITH ❑ BLACK & WHITE PRINTS ❑ BLUE LINE PRINTS ❑ SHOP DRAVvINGS ❑ SPECIFICATIONS Return Signed WO KCCS # 5200112.03 ❑ SEPARATE COVER ❑ PHOTOGRAPHS ❑ REPORTS(S) ❑ LETTER ❑ MAP(S) ❑ SAMPLES ❑ AGREEMENTS ❑ ESTIMATES ❑ OTHER APPROVED: ❑ FOR CORRECTIONS I FOR COMMENT ❑ FOR YOUR INFO. i FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR PAYMENT 77 01 OTHER _,rF •ding 1a. i �- No. of Copies our �4; Latest Date 1,2122/33 Description f Y ^Jor k Order # KCS- FT- 03 -01 -A i - Signed & returned for further execution I I I I REiyiARKS: Sandi, As requested, we are ret4. nlnt, our (4) original copies of WO # KCS- FT -03 -01 -A1 for further execution. Please return One (1) fully executed copy for our files. Thank you and Happy New Year! SE "� T VIA F71 CERTIFIED MAIL F-1 AIR MAIL ❑ INSURED YOUR MESSENGER ❑ EXPRESS MAIL ❑ UNITED PARCEL SERVICE ® OUR MESSENGER ❑ OTHER cc Sincerely, Stephen L. Miller, P_E.,V.P. KCCS Mardi Miller, Trey Barclay J L ;v Royal Falm Square !A00 Colonial Blvd., Suite 260 • Ft. Myers, Florida 33907 • Phone: 239.1278-5999 ax: 239,278 -1776 Visit our web site at wvi.kcaeng.com Rg- -� Date: Tuesday, December 30 2003 To Steve: 12/30 BCC Report: 12/30 Scanned, to Bonnie RE: Contract: 00 -318 i; j f Name of Contract: Davis /Collier intersection Project: 60170 Amendment No.: Chan_Te Orderr'Work Order No.: ' ' ?tCS- FT- 03 -01 -A1 Contractor /Consultant: Chhar ge Order �� +,�;a• � 9 Zast BCC Approved Amount 1�.'�;A Rey, °,:ed 1 CTI --nt A mv.lni - A i l l (I Percentage Increase /Decrease .14 , ;� rrt a .. r .., c,, altant is ..,.. _ ,..a... _ o -I,,.: .. vo is e o. p c ec ,r.e 'Fce. T" addir +� a Seri to lr,;pector to *nt _ r � � _ the :,:her staff assiped, thus , sui tin , in a ..i-«' e tC Zile will `,e -oi^,2 to -he BCC plCa: you 1r Scanned Date: Em 'fir. WORK "ORDER # KCS- FT- 03 -01 -A1 (Professional Construction. Eng. Insp.) CEI Major Contract Dated Mav 8, 2001 (Bid ;003184) This "\;�`ork Order amendment is for CEI services for work known as (Title) Davis Boulevard/Collier Boulevard intersection (Reason for Proj_ect)— To _perform Construction. EnQineerins and Inspection Sc'-'vices The work is specified in the nereto and made a part of Conditions of the Agreement assigned to: KCCS. Scope of `York: proposal dated December 12_2003, which is attached this Work Order_ In accordance with the Terms and referenced above, «'ork Order #1 KCS- FT- 03 -01 -Al is Provide Construction, Engineering and Inspection Services on the Davis Boulevard/Collier Boulevard intersection. Original Work Order ......................... ............................... S197,934 Contract Amendment ':,; 1 ........................ . ...................... (S 33,924) ,. 'Ve',v, .v ° ✓t'sr„tr�_�r;I�_�o_iIC., .......- ....__ - t?,o ced P_ 1 el.. at l- Li .� f ♦.tl t �i 7Q rhedule of Work: Comnletc '"rL- 'Vithin i 80 C _ iendar la; s r'rom recclpt of the OCI�IIlal Notice to Proceed. Compensation: The County %will compensate the Firm in accordance with the new negotiated not -to- exceed sum annount of (n33,924.00), as provided in the attached proposal, which is all road project fee. PREPARED BY: i /- - 11/` `t r -,nit R'. T E., Principal Pro�evt tai aiiage APPROVED BY: Gregg R. Strakaluse, P.E., Director T- E.C.`1.D. APPROVED BY: Norman E. Feder, AICP Transportation Administrator y 7- ;1 ACCEPTED BY: Steve L. Miller, P.E., Vice President KCCS. + o `J. Date Date f � "? / F) -1h JAIN, 1 0 ID 0 0- CJ Z: O OD CD co co fy CD 0 o L) JU LU IL CD O Z Jill < CA 0 1L L;j EXHIBIT A jai• I SIO <8'_9 — ESTIMATED COSTS - CHANGE ORDER NO. ONE — CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION SERVICES Contract #00 -3184 Prepared for: Collier County, Florida Project Description: CEI SERVICES FOR COLLIER COUNTY ROA D PROJECTS Construction Engineering & Inspectinn for Davis Blvd. (SR 84) Intersection Improvements an, Collier Bled. (CR 951), Collier County, Florida Collier County Proiect #60170 Employee Regular Time Avg. Hourly 4122 Salary Classification Manhours Billing Rate" Costs Project Manager 330 -00; S 92.00 S (30,360) Senior Inspector 660.00 S 67.00 $ 44,220 Inspector = /30.Q0) S 51.00 $ (33,660) SecretaryiCieric iu v0) S 46.00 $ T11TAi �`. O f. _. iCC.'1 Rnl 1 @ SJ. vv Y S /3A A4/1 a. I�y9•- :ir' -�° ,_1,In�.�la r`•C° - SHI?1'y �eia ±orl hnc'c �,I__ _ ��' _!ni) Senior Inspector 660.00 manhrs X 1Y', _ : -,60--X S 67.00 per hr = $ 4122 s C:tor 'U! fm al n'l l'J 51.VV poi 1.' — P J -J6V� JJD- .OLal: S J3. X24) U. pump Sun, Expenses: ' Sub - total: $ (33,924) c. Subconsultant (Sampling & Testing): Force Engineering = $ - TOTAL MAXIMUM LIMITING FEES" $ (33,924) Estimate prepared by: KCCS, Inc. _ Phone No.: (813) 871 -5331 - lowly tilling rates include salary, overhead, feege benefits and operating carg,n. Pg. 1 Pnoe A -2 I of U". CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Davis /Collier Intersection PROJECT #: 60170 BID /RFP #:C1,) -2W MOD #: 1 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $ ($33,924) PO #: Lc%w15,�- /�CS - -F' - D3 -v / -A( CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 197,934 CURRENT $ 164,010 (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $ 197.934 (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval 10/09/03 Agenda Item # 16.B.9 Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount 17.1 Formula: (Current Amount /Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds "10% BCC approval is required-, under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: CURRENT: SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Adding a Senior. Inspector. with a reduction in c' er staff. iLi51 If iGt 'f IUi�I �iJt< t,l�tilvGt (Si: The COnjliitant is akina aci+IantaCie Oi the Tact that Lney are a....., rzr •...,mot, r_._. one yVcr aEEi;%� t�ra�v r'ivjC..�� o�rii .cif@ :..i:��.�. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Trey BarciaV and Steve Miller (KGCS), Lynn i h —ce i EC%i,1D iMPLEMENTATiON STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) X Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement X Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope X Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement X The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change X Proposed prices; fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE: Date: DISAPPROVE: / Date: COMMENTS: 1TE �q s- 'a r f --� Revised 8 /22/03 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE TWO EASEMENTS TO BE DEEDED TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY TO PROVIDE NEW ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE TO THE NORTH COUNTY WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY, PROJECTS 739501 AND 739502, AT NO COST. OBJECTIVE: To approve two new electric utility easements to be deeded to Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) to allow them to supply new electric power service to the new equipment being installed as a part of the North County Water Reclamation Facility (NCWRF) Expansion To 24.1 - Million Gallons Per Day (1G1)) Maximum Month Average Daily Flow (MMADF) Liquid and Solid Stream projects. CONSIDERATIONS: The NC`%',DF 1_:;pansion To 24,1 -MGD MMADF Liquid and Solids Stream projects, which are currently under construction, are adding an additional 6.5 -MGD MMADF of treatment capacity to the plant. They are scheduled to complete by September 30, 2005. New sewage treatment equipm,!�T '«eing installed as a part of these projects will require additional electric power service from I PL. On July 29, 2003, Item 16(C)(8), the Board approved new electric service rate for the NCWRF incorporating the most economical electric rates available. These new expansion projects are included in the aforementioned rate agreements. T«o r,ti ,� ten -foot wide easements originating at the entrance to the NCWRF off of Goodlette -Frank 1 <1, :id are required to accommodate all necessary electric service equipment to provide sufficient : icctric power for the new facilities. Attached are two original easement .!dents and one copy of each, for the Chairman's signature after Board approval. the n original easements must be recorded in Public Records. One original of each eas('1-, must be returned to FPL after said signature and recording. FISCAL IMPACT: None GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMP.k(*I': There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. This project is ci r i :cnt with the 2002 Wastewater Master Plan adopted by the Board on 2/25/03, Item 10(13), mm ilne FY04 Wastewater Capital Budget adopted by the Board on 9/18/03. RECOMMENDATIONS: That tht_ and of County Commissioners, as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier Couiv.,. A':iter -Sewer District, approve two easements to be deeded to FPL to provide new electric service to the NCWRF, projects 739501 and 739502, at no cost. A6 "DA ITEM MO. C_ JAM 1 3 2004 PG. I Approve FPL Easements - NCWRF Page 2 PREPARED BY: 6A� DATE: 6 d 3 Peter Schalt, PMP, Senior Project Manager Public Utilities Engineering Department REVIEWED BY: DATE: Ton Mott, Real Property Si ervisor Real Estate Services Department REVIEWED BY: -�J ' �� "�' _j�''''' DATE : J eph heatham, Director asteNvater Department 17 REVIEWED BY: /L / 2 —�Czti DATE: Ro B. Anderson, P.E., Director Pti lic Utilities Engin rin Department REVIEWED BY: Ja s W. DeLony, P.E., � dministrator Pub is Utilities Divisio DATE: zz AGENDA ITEM No. 16 /!�/ JAN 1 3 2004 PG. 02.- p,r 3: 00 FPL November 18, 2003 Hazen and Sawyer % Richard Taylor PO Box 110939 Naples, Florida 34108 Re: Collier County Waste Water Plant - Goodlette Road Gentlemen: 26430 Old Us 41 Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 Fax: 1-941-947-7345 Enclosed is the easement required for FPL to provide electric service to the captioned facility. Please execute and RECORD the easement and return the original to me. RECORD the easement at the Collier County Recording Department (774 -8327) located on the 4th floor of the Administration Building (Bldg. F) in the Collier County Government Center, 3301 E. Tamiami Tr., Naples, FL. Please execute the instrument according to the following instructions. Signing and Witnessing: A. For Individuals: Enter date in space provided. Sign on the indicated lines on the right side in the presence of two (2) separate witnesses, who sign on the lines to the left, and a notary public who completes the acknowledgement forms as described below. The notary public may be one of the witnesses and if so must sign at the left in the space provided. B. For Corporations: Enter date in space provided. The President, or Vice - President and the Secretary of an Assistant Secretary sign on lines indicated on the right, filling in their title below, in the presence of two (2) separate witnesses, who sign on the lines to the left, and a notary public who completes the acknowledgement forms as described below. The corporate seal must be affixed adjacent to the officer's signatures. C. For Individuals and Corporations: Enter the Parcel I D.# in the upper left portion of the easement. Acknowledgements: The notary public should legibly fill in all blanks, including state and count of execution, names of individuals or officers signing and their titles, state or county where empowered to act, expiration date of commission, fill in date, sign on line provided and affix seal adjacent to the signature of the notary public. If you have any questions, please call me at (239) 947 -7361. cep m Mer iarn Senior ystems Project Manager cc:file an FPL Group Company Nis. 16 c JAN 1 3 2004 r6. WR ,7 70022 Sec.27 , Twp 48S Rge 25 E Pared J.D. # (Maintained by County Appraiser) Form 3722 (Stocked) Rev. 7/94 This Instrument Prepared By Name: Jim Merriam Co. Name: FPL Co. Address 26430 Old 41 Road Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 Page 1 of 2 The undersigned, in consideration of the payment of $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grant and give to Florida Power & Light Company, its licensees, agents, successors, and assigns, an easement forever for the construction, operation and maintenance of overhead and underground electric utility facilities (including wires, poles, guys, cables, conduits and appurtenant e Apmen t) to be installed from time to time; with the right to reconstruct, improve, a to, enlarge, change the voltage, as well as, the size of and remove such facilities or any of them within an easement 10 feet in width described as follows: Revved ftw C".aok Col An FPL Company easement more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Said easement prepared by Hole Montes, dated 10/03. Together with the right to pen�it any oihes person, fan or corporation to attach wires to any facilities hereunder and lay cable and conduit within the easement and to operate the same for con�mications purposes; the right of ingress and egress to said premises at all times; the right to clear the land and keep It cleared of all trees, undergrowth and other obstructions within the easement area; to trim and cut and keep trimmed and cut all dead, weak, leaning or dangerous trees or lunbs outside of the easement area which might interfere with or fall n the Imes or systerrs of co�mications or power traz>smission or distribution; and further grants, to the fullest extent the undersigned the power to grant, If at all, the rights hereinabove granted on the land heretofore described, over, along, under and across the roads, streets or highways adjoining or through said property. ATTEST: DATED: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. By: _ Deputy Clerk By: Chairman Approved at to form and legal suffi iency: Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney AGENDA IT R0. JAN 1 3 2004 K. 20' EAS =MEN- (OR. BOOK 607, P . 2741 0 W l) W O w m �' II < 7 W Y W Z W U O Q Nz ��o °� zw oIo c °Mx W Hn7 0�'Q r,,,Z 41N J W O p 7 m,pK q n0 z WO Lo N Q00 W W: jpW oW H W _aOO m� Z. 1J W oV, FZ u N Z w 3 ZO SW <�Nry <2 �1.1p�W0��fp U1J H FO �QW Nh NmO- p�W�mN W�p. w W Ww N m F U w <w m< U w�Wa.ppoZa� mN� �o,w�a z wN O< j0 vOi U �' mOuZ �Fw En O ZNO O�ZpU�tn f~A �w/iIO m� ° li Z aN� �p mm voim a Uo t 1. « Z <vOf KO 1~/l Q� O cc �Qo <o «zWawTi wj:'io�m��a°ye Zn o� o N O =Y Or �pw� 'N WOW �N !H N M Nm n Oh =�< V<I�Z <W W iV�ygj�3 W W �� C cV O� O of O yW� Ow nU�epN <Ow n�NNO W OF<- ZOO mU ZW m _ W= ^m Zo� 00 j_NZ F�FNO Om z=V��Qw nZ w9 0 (D ,. �}- 1A \ \!' za F¢ NcwiNwNwt r<- 'aivUwin�j�ci �0 °Ln Z w m �. Z O o"Z'°wzopo sv Vii zw a z m ? Z O Z Utn 4 J N N N W U W W Z O O F 1 I\ �m m° o oF-O ZN W O ZN Ow No� Wz 0 N �Y 4< F <w m 31 t~/1Wm t�/1 W< m � O \ z }mrWWZN W a g t Z< o N N < M cD F V m Y m m O i, O a 4 W W w 7 3 N Z m m O N" m N wim Z m U o?F-m� FOOZ F=O�� < - w W <1mww) -OZ� r., U'�w?3y0 Z.3i il ��tW w ViZ �F � W WU W�� OZ� N <Nt~/1� wQ �n(IZ m V U� U_ r mp U < <� �, F-�O W W^ NON Z n h� orn h1-�N Q F- WW O W W o j° < W W If1 N WW� m N WW NWW 6i zo, mZO W 330 NO W F O W WU O J <U y, Wow y W W �4. OZ �� O m <8� In Ot� VI DI�J O Z mH N m SU ��l � n W N N ZN jr W r I C J Z 00 � O l a a 0 1 U of ✓1 Z N Q N ¢Z i-0 z Opu Z'� WW o N 00'24.02' ' W 0 04 E 00'29_'24' E Ll L4 131 4.73 i5 `4.02' V EAST UNE N.E. 1/4 SEC 27 -48 -25 / EAST UNE S.E. 1/4 SEC 27 -48 -25 O i J I a J 20' EAS =MEN- (OR. BOOK 607, P . 2741 0 W l) W O w m �' II L6 ° 0 o� n_ i OWy� N < 0- ) } m it z W 0 U Z Z m Z W O W U m J O O H H Z Z O O a_ m 0 m 0 0 CL a (T) .fl 0 = N 0 LL V ,p r 2 0 O W O Z U_ 1'- CL U V) W J a U (A.1 J Z a U H W Y N TO O"G -N O O n 3 d N.� CIiN [ C to O O ^V O O � Z � o G 0 .4 L EL V119 R 0 na i a E. i - i_IDZ ", a. , 901 b.p Z11j960 \960100Z\100Z\ AGElOA ITEM(f So. 1 JAN 1 3 2004 Pc. Q n oIo c °Mx rn 0 °OCior-- acoi� Lo w 3 w w 3 w 3 3 3 w O cc (v t O N O N M N M O cV O� O (V O M rn N n M W= 0 r 0 0 0 0 O m N Z O O M Ol O m O m O m M J V) V) Ul U) Z U) U) Z U) z J N r1 V M cD h m m O i, L6 ° 0 o� n_ i OWy� N < 0- ) } m it z W 0 U Z Z m Z W O W U m J O O H H Z Z O O a_ m 0 m 0 0 CL a (T) .fl 0 = N 0 LL V ,p r 2 0 O W O Z U_ 1'- CL U V) W J a U (A.1 J Z a U H W Y N TO O"G -N O O n 3 d N.� CIiN [ C to O O ^V O O � Z � o G 0 .4 L EL V119 R 0 na i a E. i - i_IDZ ", a. , 901 b.p Z11j960 \960100Z\100Z\ AGElOA ITEM(f So. 1 JAN 1 3 2004 Pc. vv-R 9 89994 Sec.27 , Twp 48S Rge 25 E Parcel I.D. # (Maintained by County Appraiser) Form 3722 (Stocked) Rev. 7/94 This Instrument Prepared By Name: Jim Merriam Co. Name: FPL Co. Address 26430 Old 41 Road Bonita Spnrgs, Florida 34135 Page 1 of 2 The undersigned, in consideration of the payment of $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grant and give to Florida Power 8t Light Company, its licensees, agents, successors, and assigns, an easement forever for �e constriichon, operation and maintenance of overhead and underground electric utility facilities (including wires, poles, guys, cables, conduits and appwRenant equ�ment) to be installed from time to time; with the right to reconstruct; mmprove, add to, enlarge, change the voltage, as well as, the size of and remove such facilities or any of them within an easement 10 feet in width described as follows: xKa �. c c An FPL Company easement more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. Said easement prepared by Hole Montes, dated 10/03. Together with the right to permit any other person, firm or coloration to attach wires to any facilities hereunder and lay cable and conduit within the easement and to operate the same for commminications purposes; the right of ingress and egress to said premises at all times; the right to clear the land and keep it cleared of all trees, --'C—' r0 rah and other obstructions within the easement area; to trim and cut and keep trimed and cut all dead, weak, leaning or dangerous trees or limbs outside of the easement area which might interfere with or fall upon the Iines or systems of communications or power transmission or ;iistribution; and further ,rants, to the fullest extent the undersigned has the power to grant, if at all, the rights hereinabove granted on the and heretofore described, over, along, under and across the roads, streets or highways adjoining or through said property. ATTEST: DATED: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, :CLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. By: Deputy Clerk 3y: Chairman Approved at to form and legal sufficiency: J' Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney //, IL MO. JAN 1 3 2004 PG. Wry Z � Y � U � rn N wZ 'o Us, SOW CILZVt j S 00'27'02' E 1314.73' F-JV usr vE �c iH sc a-a�v 3. W N N 0= W m �z< � p N Q Z Z z�(A / O O N �i7 N n m `O z s �r L E L3 3 in O O O �g a m z s 04'53'05 E 109.23 EASTERLY RIGNT -OF -WAY LINE w C) QLo 0 0 O W N KW O N F W 7nQ� y OUm O O < Z W <� z 0 m Z 7 Wvi 0 0 O O O J z n_pp WO ON 3;0 Z� ^� m7�. < P) Of ^OLWOS r�W awQpJ Z OO Fz ie0 -0 zw�(~i'�z� �� O<W w6w3 <�386 O � �k' c: V Zl WW <I~D OL< j� 0� 0. W w 0, 41w W h� N z� O U � 6 5 (wnm V) U 0.N Co D:Q O- N OVO W W F-oW�O a W n Nh- '' < WU ~O6 W OQ V) Ln Dw a -iFZz�zzsetw�noL`'vio�°z U N ice. 0 cw.� ° -••aoX v~i��¢w �_ '�Z<oz <vQrzW ap o z aW iv<y.pWZiz7nOZ 0�gn`0.N� Z O C, a j nLL N li o ` r7 0.O !znJ WO `r 1a�.. w p�0 1•�- twi11�i70 Or 44pp0 <00 t6 w I V3O W;oWW <� v�{_ WZ= ¢ N �,yESTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE __ -- 3s N •t: t 2OU� � On W!n U FE U xW VI to N zF5 U 6a. l�wf n 4. O� N �3 w- 4U. I Fpp1,1 < p OWN ui � O N< F¢ O 08O OOp6On yUy'' UW mZ OM M6,zp w� (fin Z0. NZIJw1 ism- OOW,, mpJ = <00 Z <N< oI''�ozo$LLW��U�'iWW��o�,3Wi lLU oQ W m z cFiod Nm W�N ? <pM¢'O�aH UZ .t .Z pZ< _7W vw z W _ ZZ om S OOZ m C {.'VN= W p 1�{a W w? Nr'nnNZ -�k W.z <3F..X <;oQOU t -N aw O F Q< c'zlxSw, � o fIA� a Op O W'�nj N f: Z� .' - zm I fj %, F• w< c �2 p� F �z8KwF�6<toz<pzwm o� ^ a Z� ,t . 5 Z Z0Wp 6a07401.i0oh ci��ZN `r. [P ZZ d o0 1 -�F-zFN 'QQWO <V'W LLwJw m<�zW0 zx w <70�Vw1 Ir 1- INZ W VOI W �o O 0.'W =333` Z �wi..arWaWwnWO wOQ Nw zNzW O� inao ZN��n p a 0.o.3 Dim Zw �WN W 65 N z<�f~IIW OI~n W ul W CC) <00 NU JO[ <00 CbO O - Z'K W KOU O S � 00� -mo 0 Z m� 0 �w :c C) m L E L3 3 in O O O �g a m z s 04'53'05 E 109.23 EASTERLY RIGNT -OF -WAY LINE Y tc 0 0 Z O a. U N W J Q W J Q Z Q U F- W Y 1n r O O `� N a p O n 3QN�.n- mMloo U J N ZU Z C W N t C G V m° — vim v 0 z6 oor 0 `` a w C) QLo 0 0 o00 0 N 0 N N 0 0 0 O GOODLEVE ROAD PAGE 03) W PER O.R�_ BOOK -- L, w 3 3 w J O n _ -- f- Z � Co I= u7 O u7 O Ln C Q U N ice. (V I\; N -' z ....' N ") N r7 N p �,yESTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE __ -- � z p 0 C0 O c0 O O J I z ZI cn (n z � o W O W a ° I' - zm I V w Y tc 0 0 Z O a. U N W J Q W J Q Z Q U F- W Y 1n r O O `� N a p O n 3QN�.n- mMloo U J N ZU Z C W N t C G V m° — vim v 0 z6 oor 0 `` a O O C` CL .e ��o wi�ll!L��^�C -r4 Ja�}oid `� °55 8 - OOZ oory boy S.p 1350'�:cO.J jL'•�::O Z•• fl NO. AGE --= l.�.S.rE� JAN 13 2004 PG. (FRANK BLVD.) a GOODLEVE ROAD PAGE 03) W PER O.R�_ BOOK -- �- -941. IR _ —_ (FORMER SEABOAR = COASTUNE RA —_ (n WE n _ -- f- Z � E. O w O rQ U 0- x z z a - . - - -- w =W �,yESTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE __ -- � U Z V Z w Z 4 Z o z ° o W O W a ° U CEI - zm V w L� c �2 O O F- F- o 0 ZZ Z O O Dim m ¢ O O C` CL .e ��o wi�ll!L��^�C -r4 Ja�}oid `� °55 8 - OOZ oory boy S.p 1350'�:cO.J jL'•�::O Z•• fl NO. AGE --= l.�.S.rE� JAN 13 2004 PG. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE A BUDGET AMENDMENT FROM SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS TO SOLID WASTE CAPITAL PROJECTS TO DESIGN RECYCLING AND HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION CENTERS, PROJECT 59003, IN THE AMOUNT OF $375,500 OBJECTIVE: To transfer sufficient funds to Solid Waste Capital. Projects (Fund 474), for the design of four Recycling and Hazardous Waste Collection Centers. CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier County Public Utilities Engineering Department recently established a Project Manager position with a goal of handling Solid Waste engineering projects. Projects previously funded from Operations (Fund 470) will be funded in the recently established Solid Waste Capital Projects fund (Fund 474). This new fund was approved by the Board on September 18, 2003 as part of the FY04 budget approval process. The first phase of the project, Construct Four Recycling and Hazardous Waste Collection Centers, is the design effort. The Board of County Commissioners approved an engineering services work order proposal up to $375,500 on December 16, 2003, Agenda Item 16.C.16. FISCAL IMPACT: A budget amendment in the amount of $375,500 is necessary for this project. The funding for these projects, which comes from the Solid Waste Disposal Fund (470), was budgeted and approved by the Board of County Commissioners at the Budget Hearing of September 18, 2003. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners approve a budget amendment in the amount of $375,500 from the Solid Waste Disposal Fund (Fund 470) to the Solid Waste Capital Projects Fund (Fund 474). -- !AN 13 2004 Executive Summary WasteCollectCtrs Page 2 i SUBMITTED BY: \ I `� �= _DATE: R. Shane Cox, P.E., Sr. Project Manager Public Utilities Engineering Department REVIEWED BY:I-`i `� DATE: Ron Hovell, P.E., Principal Project Manager Public Utilities Engineering Depa., :ment REVIEWED BY: % ,' _ __r DATE: Y Roy B. Anderson, P.E., Director Public Utilities Engineering Department REVIEWED BY: �`-- ,� . '7/ DATE: G.GGeir/ge Yilmaz, P.E., Director Solid Waste Department APPROVED BY: _ r DATE: l 31 03 James W. DeLony, P.E., Ad6nistrator Public Utilities Division ,,—, JAN 1 3 2004 PG. oZ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE A WORK ORDER, UNDER CONTRACT #01 -3271, FIXED TERM PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS, WITH TAYLOR ENGINEERING FOR CAXAMBAS PASS DREDGING AND SOUTH MARCO ISLAND BEACH RENOURISHMENT, PROJECT 90500, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $206,000 OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval of a work order for engineering services to design and permit the renourishment of Marco Island South Beach with dredged sand from adjacent Caxambas Pass, in an amount not to exceed $205,516.60. CONSIDERATIONS: A Request for Proposal (RFP) 01 -3271 was issued on July 25, 2001 for qualified firms capable of providing engineering services for coastal zone management projects. On November 13, 2001, agenda item 10. 1, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved m contracts with three firs: Humiston & Moore Engineers, Coastal Planning and Engineering and Taylor Engineering. On September 11, 2001, agenda item 16.C.13, the BCC approved $335,000 for a project to dredge Caxambas Pass and renourish tl<<._ ; _olth end of Marco Island. Taylor Engineering has submitted an engineering services proposal in the amount of $205,516.60 to design and permit the renourishment of the southern 4,000 tect of Marco Island (Marco Island South Beach) with dredged sand from Caxambas Pass. The ini.ial construction budget estimate is $2,000,000. The Coastal Advisory Committee recor'.. , 11(led this work order proposal at their meeting on August 12, 2003 and the Tourist Develoriii tit Council followed suit on September 22, 2003. The beach at the south end of Marco l �' .,,s been the only eroding section of the main Marco Island beach over the last ten years. In 5L;?<<mber 2001, tropical Storm Gabrielle caused damage that the Federal Emergency Mana-_r r _ r �,;ency (FEMA) has deemed eligible for Public Assistance. FEMA estimates that the stone caused the loss of approximately 50,000 cubic yards of sand from Marco Island Solna tsei.lc11, ran 51,000,000 as the estimated reimbursement for Tropical Storm Gabrielle recovery. v.n �Ii.'�iitional $500,000 could potentially be reimbursed from the Florida Department of En,, rr, ;unental Protection through the Beach Management Funding Assistance Program. FISCAL IMPACT: The funds are «- .:.1; ?le in the project budget. The source of funds is Tourist Development Taxes. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT_: Chere is no impact to the Growth Management Plan as this project is within the City of Marc.- ' -land limits. RECOMMENDATION: That the Bo n-ri ruti>orize the Public Utilities Administrator to finalize negotiations with Taylor Engineering, r ,.n engineering services work order to design and permit the renounshment of Marco Isl;i.,�:i Beach in an amount not to exceed $206,000. GENOA ITEM N0. - -1 JAN 1 3 2004 PG. Executive Summary Renourishment of Marco Island South Beach Page 2 SUBMITTED BY: Date: Paul Kowa, P..y., Beach au d Utilities Project Manager REVIEWED BY: �,_... , ' ; - (� Date: /��4, 0 Ron Hovell, P.E., Special Projects Manager C��' 2 (o-3 REVIEWED BY: Y _ Date: -7 Stephen Y. Cam 1, Purchasing Director 63 REVIEWED BY: ✓) Date: y��B. Anderson, P.E., Public Utilities Engineering Director APPROVED BY: l�drEd.7 t,,' �' Date: lames W. DeLony, P.E., PulAic Utilities Administrator AGEt�D(� ITEM 2: N0. JAN 1 3 2004 PG. a Scope of Services and Cost Proposal for Design and Permitting Services to Restore South Marco Island This scope of services and cost proposal has been developed with the following assumptions: 1. Collier County intends to restore approximately one mile of beach along south Marco Island, from R-144 to the south terminal groin (south of R-148), with approximately 100,000 cy of sand. 2. Design and permitting services will be performed between January and November 2004. 3. The Caxambas Pass Inlet Management Plan (page 6-8) states that the Department of Army pen-nit, issued for beach restoration in south Marco Island is valid till 2005. Mr. Mike Nowicki (Jacksonville District, Corps of Engineers [USACE]) confirmed that the permit is valid till March 1, 2005 (personal winmunication, 2 February 2003). We propose to use portions of the 1991 and 1997 borrow areas — which have shoaled following dredging — as the borrow area for the proposed nourishment. Thus, we assume that no new Department of Army permit will be required as the proposed nourishment and borrow area templates lie within the pcnnitted templates. 4. No new erosion control line will be necessary. 5. Collier County will provide us with upland property ownership information, construction easements, and aerial photos of the beach restoration area. 6. Magnetometer and side scan surveys will be required for the borrow area. We have assumed that we will there will be no magnetic anomalies and, therefore, that diver verification of the magnetometer and side scan data will not be required. 7. Vibracores are required to characterize the sediments in the borrow area. We have assumed that we will require ten vibracores to characterize the borrow area sediments in terms of its lithologieal and grain size characteristics. 8. We will use natural resources information contained in the Caxambas Pass Inlet Management Plan and other readily available sources to prepare the permit application. We will use limited field observations only to confirm natural resources information contained in the inlet management plan. No biological surveys are included in this budget estimate. 9. We have not budgeted for any beach sand compaction measurements. 10. We will use the 2002 beach and borrow area surveys for the permit application. We have not budgeted for any new bathymetric or topographic Surveys. Such surveys may be A! / A EEM N0. JAN 13 2004 PG. 3 needed for preparation of project plans and specifications. However, this scope of work includes neither the plans and specifications nor such surveys_ 11. Collier County will pay all permit- related fees. 12. Our services do not include pre- or post - construction monitoring. Should any of these assumptions prove invalid, we will advise the County about any additional time or funding requirements. Task 1 Pre - Application Meeting and Engineering Design of Fill We will meet with the Bureau of Beaches and Wetland Resources (BBWR) at its Tallahassee offices for a pre - application meeting. Project design requires the following: (1) a baseline template to account for existing beach conditions, (2) background shoreline and beach volume erosion rates, (3) a design template, (4) a renourishment interval, (5) native sand characterization, (6) an overfill ratio, (7) i -s. the construction and equilibrium fill volumes, and (8) anticipated short- and long -term fill performance. Beach fill cross sections and total fill volume will be determined in this task. Fill performance analyses, required to optimize the beach fill, are also permit requirements. These analyses are briefly described below. Baseline Template — Existing beach and dune conditions comprise the baseline template. The beach fill will be added to the baseline template to develop the desired construction and equilibrium templates. Background Erosion Volumes — Background erosion rates will be computed from historic and 2002 beach profile data. Design Template — Background and episodic erosion rates in the project area, together with data on relative locations of shorefront structures with respect to the 2002 shoreline, will be used to develop the design template to provide the desired degree of storm protection. U0 JAN 13 2004 PG. U Renourishment Interval — This is a permit related parameter. The renourishment interval is a function of the background erosion in the project area, the design fill, and the computed performance of the beach fill. Native Sands Characterization — Sand size and composition characteristics are needed for beach design and the permit application. We will collect and analyze native beach sediment samples for grain size, composition, and organic content characteristics. Overfill Analysis — Grain sizes vary spatially in the borrow area. Given this variation, the final overfill ratio used to determine the initial fill volume adjustment is a function of the specific location of the final borrow area identified for the beach restoration project as well as native beach sediment characteristics. This analysis will use the specific borrow area geometry to ascertain the final overfill ratio and define the overfill volume adjustment. Construction and Equilibrium Fills — historic and 2002 survey data will be used to design the construction profiles and to compute the expected equilibrium profiles. Fill Performance — The beach fill acts as a perturbation to the local shoreline and evolves in a unique manner. An analytical shoreline change model will be applied to quantify beach fill evolution to determine the long -teen project performance. All engineering analyses pertaining to these issues will be performed in this task. We will conduct a field inspection of the project beaches to suppiement and verity the above analyses. In particular, we will observe and document the conditions of the beach — berm widths, dune tints, beach and dune foreshore slopes, and distance and elevation of the vegetation line with respect to the shoreline — to qualitatively assess recent beach behavior. Estimated Cost Task 1 $20,226.30 Task 2 Borrow Site Design The location and dimensions (horizontal limits and depth of cut) of the borrow area will be developed. We will engage our subconsultant, Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey, to collect and AGENDA ITEM -►o- 16 c- JAN 1 3 2004 PG. document the lithological and grain size characteristics of up to ten 20-ft vibracores. We will analyze the vibracore data to characterize sediment compatibility. Magnetometer and side scan surveys will be required for the borrow area. We will engage Marine Resources, Inc. to collect side scan and magnetometer data to characterize the borrow area. Estimated Cost Task 2 $67,506.00 Task 3 Borrow Site Dredging Impact Analysis We propose to use portions of the 1991 and 1997 borrow areas — which have shoaled following dredging — as the borrow area for the upcoming nourishment. The FDEP requires a physical impact assessment of the effects of sand removal from the shoal. Impacts of shoal dredging on fronting beaches and the inlet will be evaluated with wave propagation and tidal current models. The applied wave model will simulate the effects of changing bottom depths on the near-shore wave climate by accow,, :i_, for refraction, diffraction, shoaling, and breaking. Similarly, we will apply a tidal hydrod namics model to simulate the effects of dredging on tidal currer We will use 2,QQ2 Caxambas P_ i,athymetric data, supplemented by publicly available nauticai chart bathymetric data, to _cii.vrate model grids. USACE wave hindcast data and available astronomical tidal constituen�s .,iii force the wave and tidal hydrodynamics models. Note that we have not budgeted for t:._)i,it ng the models to site - specific nearshore or inland wave characteristics, tidal elevations. .. .:i currents. The borrow area will be optimized based upon models' results to minimize. it »irate, negative impacts to nearby beaches. We will also examine the effects of borrow ;:r :, ; ;;Ming on natural sand bypassing. The results of the investigation will be documentea in an nment for the permit application. Estimated Cost Task 3 S31,2 -1 1 Task 4 Environmental Characterization Taylor Engineering staff , _, iew existing literature and the side -scan and magnetometer surveys of the borrow i,, characterize environmental resources in the project area. Borrow area characterization � ..-us on the ebb shoal system in the vicinity of the pass. We expect submerged natural reso.ircC < n both the borrow area and beach placement area to consist exclusively of a sand bottom c. r.irunity. Taylor Engineering will, however, review the AGENDA G ITEM NO. _1�� JAN 1 3 2004 PG. results of the side -scan surveys for evidence of hard bottom in the borrow area. We will rent a boat and diving gear to perform limited field observation of the nearshore to confirm the literature descriptions. We have budgeted for two days of boat and diving gear rental at the rate of $500 /day. We have not budgeted to perform any diver inspection of the borrow area. Taylor Engineering will also observe and map habitat in the beach placement and dune reconstruction areas. We will prepare a narrative for inclusion in the permit application to describe the natural resources and communities in the borrow and placement areas. This scope of work assumes that existing information combined with the observations described above will suffice for a permit application. It does not, therefore, include any biological sampling, underwater video surveys, or wetland jurisdictional surveys. Estimated Cost Task 4 $12,410.00 Task 5 Permit Drawings We estimate that the permit application will require a total of 18 sheets of drawings (including three contingency sheets). Current aerial photography, supplied by Collier County, will be used as the base map for all project plan view drawings, with the exception of those pertaining to the borrow area. The drawing sheets will include: • I cover sheet/location map showing project location, sponsor, date, project name and other pertinent information • 1 plan borrow area plan view sheet showing existing bathymetry, core boring locations, territorial sea limits, and specific area to be dredged • 2 borrow area sheets showing core boring logs and sediment grain size distributions for area to be dredged • 2 borrow area sheets showing section views of area to be dredged • 2 sheets showing existing conditions plan view • 2 sheets showing plan view construction drawings, including initial and adjusted toe of fill • 2 sheets showing fill section views showing construction profile and adjusted profile • 3 detail sheets • 3 contingency sheets Estimated Cost Task 5 $12,674.00 AGE ITEM 40. '0 JAN 13 2004 [PG. `7 Task 6 FDEP Permit Application Work here is directed toward the completion and submittal of a Joint Coastal Permit application package. In addition to the permit drawings described above, the application package will include a letter of transmittal; detailed project narratives describing (1) a project summary, (2) the need for a restoration project, (3) the 2004 beach fill, (4) the 2004 borrow area, (5) borrow area excavation impact analysis and results; legal descriptions and plots of the project base line (the ECL); and copies of geotechnical reports. Other documents and reports will be attached to the application as necessary. Each attachment to the application will be listed and discussed in order of appearance. We will also address the following required permitting issues: Water Quality Variance — Discharge operations within the beach restoration area will require a water quality variance for turbidity. A plume analysis will support the variance request for an increased distance within , ch the turbidity standard will be temporarily exceeded. Pipeline Corridor from the Borrow Area to the Beach — A pipeline corridor from the borrow area to the beach will be defined for use by the contractor. We will use existing information to select the pipeline corridor. Staging Areas — Collier County must provide staging areas for the project. We will facilitate negotiations between Collier County and FDEP staff regarding staging areas. Monitoring Plan— We will prepare a physical monitoring plan whose intent will be to evaluate post - construction project performance and to determine whether the borrow area excavation caused any detrimental effects on beaches adjacent to and shoals within Caxambas Pass. Contingency Plan— We will prepare a contingency plan to mitigate potential erosion to beaches adjacent to and shoals within Caxambas Pass should the post- project construction reveal that the borrow area excavation is responsible for such beach erosion. AGEYA ISM No. / li JAN 11r 3 2004 PG. O We will meet with FDEP staff and present the details of the permit application at a meeting in Tallahassee. Estimated Cost Task 6 $28,44630 Task 7 FDEP Permit Revision Following the initial submission of the permit application package, the FDEP will likely respond with a series of questions requiring additional work and revisions to the project design. Accordingly, our cost estimate includes one complete revision to the permit application. Work on this task includes revised engineering analyses and calculations (Tasks 1, 2 and 3), preparation of a completely revised set of permit drawings, agency liaison for the sole purpose of revision preparation and submittal, and preparation of supporting correspondence. In particular, the engineering analyses would likely include both the borrow and fill areas. Our experience with similar projects suggests that FDEP will likely require resolution of questions about fill performance, borrow area definition, and borrow area excavation. Environmental and physical impacts of any project redesign on the borrow and till areas will be addressed to support the revised permit application. At this stage, we will also prepare and submit monitoring and mitigation plans We have also budgeted for a meeting with FDEP staff in Tallahassee to discuss project concerns. Estimated Cost Task 7 $17,492.00 Task 8 COE /County/Wildlife Coordination The single most important activity during the p;, hitting process is the establishment and maintenance of a clear line of communications between the applicant and various regulatory and advisory agencies. Although a new federal permit application appears unnecessary, coordination and liaison activities will likely be required between Collier County, the Jacksonville District COE, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) will also be involved in review ,40. AGE ITEm JAN 13 2004 PG. of the FDEP permit. Accordingly, we have budgeted one day for Dr. Taylor and seven days for Dr. Srinivas to work with these agencies. In addition, we have also budgeted five days for Dr. Steve Schropp to coordinate with regulatory agencies on specific environmental issues which may arise after the initial submittal of the application package. Also included are two round trips between Jacksonville and Collier County to coordinate with the COE, FDEP, FWCC, USFWS, and NMFS on environmental issues. Estimated Cost Task 8 $15,518.00 Estimated Total Project Cost $205,516.60 Note that we have assumed costs of 5100 /person/day — listed as per diem expenses to the cost proposal — to cover meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) and lodging while staying overnight at Marco Island. Our estimated cost to perform the above described services is $205,516.60. We will perform these services for a lump sum fixed price of $205,516.60. AGE / t ITEM 40. JAN 1 3 2004 PG. !0 Principal Page 1 1,232.00 Project Manager TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC. Senior Engineer 3.500 COST SUMMARY BY TASK Engineer II 2.000 P2002 -096: D &P SERVICES TO RESTORE SOUTH MARCO ISLAND TASK 1: FDEP Meeting; Fill Design 4,896.00 Administrative 1.000 Labor Days Cost Task Totals Principal 1.000 1,232.00 Project Manager 2.000 1,648.00 Senior Engineer 5.000 4,120.00 Engineer II 5.000 3,280.00 Engineer 1 8.000 4,608.00 Administrative 1.000 408.00 Clerical 1.000 328.00 Total Man -Days 23.000 Labor Cost 15,624.00 Non -Labor Units Cost Sediment size analysis 15.0 2,250.00 airline tkt jax -marco 2.0 800.00 Days per diem 2.0 200.00 Rental car days 2.0 120.00 R/T miles Jax -Tall 370.0 107.30 Sand organic content tests 15.0 1,125.00 Total Non -Labor Cost 4,602.30 Total Task 1 20,226.30 TASK 2: Borrow area design Labor Days Cost Task Totals Principal 1.000 1,232.00 Project Manager 4.000 3,296.00 Senior Engineer 3.500 2,884.00 Engineer II 2.000 1,312.00 Engineer 1 8.500 4,896.00 Administrative 1.000 408.00 Clerical 1.000 328.00 tal Man -Days 21.000 Labor Cost 14,356.00 Non -Labor Units Cost Graphics and reproduction 1.0 50.00 Subcontract mag and side scan surveys 1.0 18,100.00 Subcontract vibracores colt and analysis 1.0 35,000.00 Total Non -Labor Cost 53,150.00 Total Task 2 67,506.00 TASK 3: Borrow site dredging impact analysis Labor Days Cost Task Totals Principal 2.000 2,464.00 FG. � ITEM N (o /ITEM 3 2004 J Page 2 P2002 -096: D &P SERVICES TO RESTORE SOUTH MARCO ISLAND Project Manager 6.000 4,944.00 Senior Engineer 5.000 4,120.00 Engineer 11 24.000 15,744.00 Engineer 1 2.750 1,584.00 Technician 4.000 1,472.00 Administrative 2.000 816.00 Total Man -Days - 15.750 408.00 Labor Cost 1.000 31,144.00 Non -Labor _Tits Cost Graphics and reproduction I.0 ivv.UU Total Non -Labor Cost 100.00 Total Task 3 $ 31,244.00 TASK 4: Environmental characterization Labor �s Cost Task Totals Principal 0.500 616.00 Project Manager 1.250 1,030.00 Senior Engineer 1.000 824.00 Engineer I 1 500 6,624.00 Administrative 1.000 408.00 Clerical 1.000 328.00 Total Man -Days 1 Labor Cost 9,830.00 Non -Labor Its Cost airline tkt jax -marcc ' 0 800.00 Days per diem 6.0 600.00 Rental car 3.0 180.00 Boat and gear rental 1.0 1,000.00 Total Non -Labor Cost 2,580.00 Total Task 4 $ 12,410.00 TASK 5: Permit drawings bo La r .- - ; Cost Task Totals Project Manager 2.250 1,854.00 Engir. -er 11 '- 000 2,624.00 Engineer 1 5.750 3,312.00 Technician 1.000 4,048.00 Administrative 1.000 408.00 Clerical 1.000 328.00 Total Man -Days 5.000 Labor Cost 12,574.00 Non -Labor as Cost Graphics and reproduction 1.0 100.00 AGENDA ITEM N0. /l G JAN 1 3 2004 PG. /'-I— Page 3 P2002 -096: D&P SERVICES TO RESTORE SOUTH MARCO ISLAND Total Non -Labor Cost TASK 6: FDFP Permit 100.00 Total Task 5 $ 12,674.00 Project Manager Senior Engineer Engineer II Engineer I Senior Technician Technician Administrative Clerical 10.000 2.000 3.750 16.250 2.000 3.000 0.500 1.875 Total Man -Days 42.375 Labor Cost Non -Labor Units Graphics and reproduction R/T miles Jax -Tall Total Non -Labor Cost 8.240.00 1,648.00 2,460.00 9,360.00 912.00 1,104.00 204.00 615.00 Cnst 1.0 100.00 370.0 107.30 28,239.00 207.30 Total Task 6 $ 28,446.30 TASK 7: FDEP Permit Revision Principal 1.500 1,848.00 Project Manager 3.500 2,884.00 Senior Engineer 3.000 2,472.00 Engineer II 3.000 1,968.00 Engineer 1 6.750 3,888.00 Senior Technician 3.000 1,368.00 Technician 6.000 2,208.00 Administrative 1.250 510.00 Clerical 0.750 246.00 Total Man -Days 28.750 Labor Cost 17,392.00 Non -Labor Units Cost Graphics and reproduction 1.0 100.00 Total Non -Labor Cost 100.00 Total Task 7 $ 17,492.00 TASK 8: COE /County/Wildlife Coordination Labor Days Cost Task Totals F AUNOA ITEM JAN 1 3 2004 F . /3 Page 4 P2002 -096: D&P SERVICES TO RESTORE SOUTH MARCO ISLAND Principal 6.000 7,392.00 Project Manager 7.000 5,768.00 Administrative 2.250 918.00 Total Man -Days 15.250 Labor Cost 14,078.00 Non -Labor Units Cost airline tkt jax -marco Z.0 °VV.VV Days per diem 4.0 400.00 Rental car 4.0 240.00 Total Non -Labor Cost 1,440.00 Total Task 8 $ 15,518.00 Project Total $ 205,516.60 AGENDA ITEM JAN 1 3 2004 PG. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AUTHORIZATION TO PARTICIPATE IN A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT WITH THE NATIONAL BIOSOLIDS PARTNERSHIP AND APPROVE A LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE COLLIER COUNTY WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT AND THE NATIONAL BIOSOLIDS PARTNERSHIP AT NO COST TO THE COUNTY. OBJECTIVE: That :he Board of County Commissioners, Ex- officio, the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District authorizes the Collier County Wastewater Department to participate in a Demonstration Project with the National Biosolids Partnership for establishing an Environmental Management System covering wastewater solids and biosolids management and approves a Letter of Understanding between the Collier County Wastewater Department and the National Biosolids Partnership located in Alexandria, Virginia. CONSIDERATION: The University of Florida Center for Training, Research and Education for Environmental Occupations has been selected on a national grant program to develop a blueprint for a Biosolids Environmental Management System Certification Program. Collier County has been asked to participate in this grant program. The University of Florida will act as Collier County's consultant and assist Collier County in the development of a Biosolids Environmental Management System at no cost to the county. A Collier County point of contact will be asked to attend three training sessions in Alexandria, Virginia over the next 18 months. All travel costs will be borne by the grant. This program will be a great benefit to Collier County as we develop and gain public acceptance of our composting project. This opportunity will give Collier County a third party audit that will validate our compliance with all Federal and State regulations. We will also receive national exposure at conferences as the National Biosolids Partnership plans to advertise the success of this new program at national conferences. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact is associated with this project. The National Biosolids Partnership will commit technical resources for the first 12 months of the 18 -month program. Upon satisfactory progress in the development of Collier County's Environmental Management System, the National Biosolids Partnership will continue to provide technical assistance for the remaining six months of the 18 -month program. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. This project is consistent with the 2002 Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Public Facilities Element - Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners, Ex- Officio, the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, authorizes the Collier County Wastewater Department to participate in a Demonstration Project with the National Biosolids Partnership for establishing an Environmental Management System covering wastewater solids and biosolids management and approves a Letter of Understanding between the Collier County Wastewater Department and the National Biosolids Partnership. The Board of County Commissioners, Ex- Officio, the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, authorizes the Chairperson to sign the Letter of Understanding between the Collier County Wastewater Department and the National Biosolids Partnership. AGENDA ITEM NO. JAN 13 2004 [PG. / SUBMITTED BY: ��' -0� ( / l -i `' Date: 1Z -0,5 Marisa Garcia, Wastew ter Operations Analyst REVIEWED BY Date: 12-29--o3 J /epph Cheatham, Wastewater Director REVIEWED BY: Date: - Z/at /o3 Tom Wides, Public Utilities Director of Operations APPROVED BY: ��_ _'& lcJ __ Date: /oZ 31 03 James W. DeLony, P.E., P is Utilities Administrator AU/' WA ITE11 j JAN 1 3 2004 PG. LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN The Collier County Wastewater Department Naples, Florida and the National Biosolids Partnership for Establishing an Environmental Management System Covering Wastewater Solids and Biosolids Management Demonstration Project JAN 1 3 2004 PG. --T National Biosolids Partnership Working to ensure environmental escelfence in biosolids management Management Committee Robert W. Hite Char. Denver. CO December 8, 2003 LJG Albert C. Gray, Ph.D.. P.E. .iEF. A exandria. VA Ken Kirk Mr. Tom Henning .,,,:SA Washinalon. DC Chair C hair Richard 0. Kuchenrither, Ph.D.. P.E. Kansas C,tv. PAD Board of County Commissioners James Hanlon J S EPA. Advisor Dear Mr. Henning: John M. Walker. Ph.D. 1, J. EPA. Advisor Steering Committee This agreement is between the Collier County Wastewater Cecil Lue -Hing, Ph.D. Chair, Chicago. IL Department, Naples, Florida (The County) and the National Biosolids - Hershel Elliott. Ph.D. Partnership (NBP) located in Alexandria, Virginia. jr'versity Park. PA Richard Finger Kipp; County, WA The County and the NBP agree to work together on a Demonstration Jane B. M PAE) D Project to test the Environmental Management System (EMS) blueprint Arnold, ld. Frank for biosolids management that is being prepared by the NBP. The Tim Huntsbur7.OH Demonstration Program, which includes approximately one hundred James Horne J S EPA N- )monstration Projects, is taking place from January 2000 to Ernie Kelley December 2005. The County will be recognized as one of the EMS I %I,Iterbur;, 0 Demonstration Projects. Robert O Detle Houston, TX A. R. Rubin. Ph.D. Objectives of the Demonstration Program: H31eign NC Paul Schur 'Ji tngton. CT Prakasam Tata, Ph.D. hiC3 '�0 . I L The objectives of the Demonstration Program are: 1) To assist organizations to establish EMS's based on the "blueprint" William E. Tottey developed by the NBP Ph,lae� Grua PA Riper, Ph.D 2) To evaluate the components of the blueprint; and Gary G. Van Lawe °°od CO 3) To gather information about EMS implementation by the Jose Velasgu Demonstration Organizations that will allow the NBP to expand the Denver. CO EMS program to full -scale implementation in 2004. AMSA Biosolids Management Committee Robert P. Dominak De"tion CO-Crair. Cleveland. OH Raymond J. Kearney Cha Los A ^pe,es. CA Wastewater Solids and Biosolids Management: This includes C� r treatment, and beneficial /disposal of NEF Residuals & Biosolids wastewater pretreatment, Committee biosolids Mark E. Lang C.ar: Rochester. NY Richard Christy Nornstosn PA 601 Wylhe Street Alexandria, VA 22314 -1994 p �:68a -tat 8 ; to l AGEN A ITEM please visit our website at: www. biosolids. _qrq _ �- tf� . biosolid n i 19901 solid organic matter reco %,er d �.< _ - - - AN 1 3 2004 ➢6. EMS Blueprint. The blueprint has five components: 1.) The Code of Good Practice; 2.) The National Manual of Good Practices; 3.) The Elements of an Environmental Management System 4.) The EMS Guidance Manual 5.) The Independent Third -Party Verification Program The Blueprint documents are found on www.biosolids.oro CoMAdtinen>t of the National Biosolids Partnership To assist The County in completing each of the steps toward development of a biosolids EMS, the National Biosolids Partnership makes the following commitments: - The NBP will assist The County in establishing an EMS by providing the EMS Blueprint documents, an EMS Implementation Plan and technical assistance to prepam the EMS consistent with the NBP Blueprint. Technical assistance will inck de two on site visits by the NBP's consultants, one visit will include the preparation of a draft EMS Implementation Plan for The County's biosolids program and the second will include a review of The County's draft EMS; the NBP will also provide up to three national training workshops on preparing the EMS to meet the NBP's requirements. NBP consultants will also be available to provide advice via telephone during the preparation of The County's EMS. Because of grant money uncertainty, the NBP will commit technical resources for 12 months. Upon satisfactory progress in the development of The County's EMS and availability of 2004 grant money, the NBP will continue to provide technical assistance for the remaining 6 months of the nrnnraM -The NBP will take appropriate steps to recognize The County's effort to develop an EMS at national biosolids conferences and through other suitable venues or means. -The NBP will provide a certificate to The County documenting its membership in the NBP Code of Good Practice Club. - The NBP will publish a report on the experiences of the organizations that participate in the Demonstration Program. The report will also contain recommendations for ways to strengthen the NBP's EMS Program based on these experiences. Commitments from the Collier County Wastewater Department, Naples, Florida AGE STEM NO. (� JAN 1 3 2004 PG. -The County commits to implementing the National Biosolids Partnership's "Code of Good Practice" (Attached) - Following the results of the Implementation Plan Site Visit — The County will develop an EMS that is consistent with the NBP's EMS blueprint and will start operating within 18 months and will start operating by June 2005 at the latest. - The County will participate in up to three two -day training and information exchange workshops with the other Demonstration Organizations during the 18 months. - The County will share its EMS experiences with other organizations and share related information at local, regional, or national conferences and meetings. -The County will provide feedback to the NBP on the EMS blueprint and docirnent costs, benefits and other relevant information through short quarterly progress reports and a final report. Points of Contact National Biosolids Partnership Mr. Robert Hite Chair National Biosolids Partnership 601 VVythe Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Br. _DA et* , Ctt4V6 Collier County Wastewater Department, Naples, Florida Chair Board of County Commissioners Approved at to form and legal sufficiency: /2,26 �03 �1,�. �i CbuliL�01OjoYney' AuT �� I 1i0. 1 ~ JAN 1 3 2004 PG. — 6 Attachment The Code of Good Practice The Code of Good Practice ( "the Code ") is a broad framework of goals and commitments to guide the production, management, transportation, storage, and use or disposal of biosolids. Those who embrace the Code and participate in the EMS commit to "do the right thing," Code subscribers and EMS participants pledge to uphold the following principles of conduct: Compliance: To commit to compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements regarding operations and reclaimed water production at the wastewater treatment facility, and management, transportation, storage, and use or disposal of biosolids away from the facility. Pr+edwt: To provide biosolids that meet the applicable standards for their intended use or disposal. Enrison in" Management System: To develop an environmental management system for biosolids that includes a method of independent third - party verification to ensure effective ongoing biosolids operations Qh+aiky Mowitoring: To enhance the monitoring of biosolids production and management practices. Qty Practices: To require good housekeeping practices for biosolids production, processing, transport and storage, and during final biosolids use or disposal operations. COndn9mmy and Emergency Response Plans: To develop response plen for unanticipated events such as inclement weather, spills, and equipment malfunctions Sustainable management Practices and Operations: To enhance the environment by committing to sustainable, environmentally acceptable biosolids management practices and operations through an environmental management system. Prawntive AWntenance: To prepare and implement a plan for preventive maintenance for equipment used to manage biosolids and wastewater solids. Continual Improvement: To seek continual improvement in all aspects of biosolids management. �GEN� ITEM CI q N0. / JAN 1 3 2004 F�G. Cormmunicaborts: To provide methods of effective communication with gatekeepers, stakeholders, and interested citizens regarding the key element of each environmental management system, including information relative to system performance. Backg round The National Biosolids Partnership's Environmental Management Initiative The NBP will assist local municipalities and private companies in implementing their EMS programs by developing the following components or "tools" of the EMS blueprint for each facility to use when implementing an EMS. These tools are now available on the NBP's Web Site at www.biosolids.org. - -A Code of Good Practice that defines broad goals to guide biosolids rrmar wWment programs. -A National Manual of Good Practices describing the full range of management practices including pretreatment, treatment, and beneficial use or disposal practices. Each facility selects practices appropriate to its situation. - Elements of an Environmental Management System (EMS) -These are the seventeen management areas that need to be part of fn EMS -EMS Guidance Manual- the guide to prepare the EW to meet NBP's EMS requirements - Independent Third Party Venfrcation -The NBP is in the process of registering three audit companies to conduct the third party audits. AGENDA ITEM No. //o G `'f' JAN 1 3 2004 PG. It EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE WORK ORDER ME- FT- 0.1 -02 WITH METCALF & EDDY FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT EMERGENCY GENERATOR SWITCHGEAR UPGRADES PROJECT, CONTRACT 00 -3119, IN THE AMOUNT OF $2.17,438.00, PROJECT 70069. OBJECTIVE: To provide professional engineering services (design. bidding, construction, start tip, and follow up services) to upgrade the emergency generator power system at North County Regional Water Treatment Plant (NCRWTP) to increase future reliability to meet peak water demands during Florida Power & Light (FPI.,)- supplied electric power outages. CONSIDERATIONS: The NCRWTP currently has lour diesel driven generators that are a part of the emergency power distribution system. They % ere originally designed and constructed so that each generator is an independent system, each serving one fourth of the total plant load. Each individual generator cannot be interconnected with the others. -therefore, when FPL - supplied electric power is lost or unavailable. all torn- �-�tn,- rators must run in order to power the plant at full capacity. If any one generator fails, the plant treatment capacity would be reduced by up to one fourth. Also in its current configuration, it is impossible to switch from FPL- supplied power to emergency generator power without a total power interruption to the plant. In order to optimize the system, it is necessary to install new paralleling s%%itchgear and new feeder cables. This Nvould allow the flexibility of having any one generator to power any part of the plant load requirements. This will increase future reliability of the plant to meet peak water demands under power failure conditions, and it will allow flexibility in transferring from FPL - supplied power to emergency power as needed without total plant interruption. Staff has negotiated Work Order ME- FT -04 -02 with Nlctc,ilf & Eddy N&E) for a t.iir fee that is commensurate with previous projects with similar scope. Once the deli,-,n engineering services under this Work Order are completed, the finished plans and specifications for construction of the facilities will be competitively bid. The current construction cost (:,�timate f(,r this work is $1,790,000. Both the engineering and construction costs are budgeted in the FY 04 bud(-,et under Project 70069. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are specitically budgeted in FY 04 for this work. I'he source of funds is Water User Fees. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: "]'his project is needed to meet future hater demands and is consistent with the 2002 Water Ntaster Plan Update tidopted by the Board February 25, 2003, Item 10(A), and the FY 04 Capital Projects Budget. adopted by the Board September 18, 2003. AGENDA ITEM JINN 1 3 2004 PG. Approve Work Order ME- FT -04 -02 Page 2 of 2 RECOMINIENDATIONS• That the Board of County Commissioners, as the Ex- officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, approve and authorize the Public Utilities Engineering Director to execute Work Order ME- FT -04 -02 with M&E, to provide professional engineering services for the NCRWTP Emergency Generator Switchgear Upgrades project, in the amount of $247,438.00, Contract 00-3 1 19. Project 70069. PREPARED BY: 'PJOL�- DATE: ( 30 C Peter Schalt, PMP, Senior Project Manager Public Utilities Engineering Department REVIEWED BY: &StFeve DATE: Ca nel Purchasing /General Services Department REVIEWED BY: DATE: /off ,3o a3 Roy B. Anderson, P.E., Director Public Utilities Engineering Department APPROVED BY: Z.-. DATE: -31) �2� .James W. DeLony, P.E., Administ or Public Utilities Division AGENDA ITEM No. J /- d_ JAN 1 3 2004 PG. �-- WORK ORDER #ME- FT -04 -02 Agreement for Fixed Term Professional Engineering Services Dated April 10, 2001 (Contract #00 -3119) This Work Order is for professional engineering services for work known as Title) NCRWTP EMERGENCY GENERATOR SWITCHGEAR UPGRADES (Reason for Project) To upgrade the existing emergency power system to ensure a reliable means of serving our customers by meeting peak water demands The work is specified in the proposal dated 12/18/03, which is attached hereto and made a part of this Work Order. In accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement referenced above, Work Order #ME- FT -04 -02 is assigned to Metcalf & Eddy. Scope of Work: (List all tasks: Task 1, Task 2, etc.) Task 1: Design Services Task 2: Bidding Services Task 3: Construction Services Task 4: Start Up Services Task 5: Follow Up Services Task 6: FP&L Study Schedule of Work- Complete work within 27 months from receipt of the Notice to Proceed authorizing start of work. Compensation: In accordance with Article Five of the Agreement, the County will compensate the Firm in accordance with the negotiated lump sum amount indicated in the schedule below (if a task is time and material, so indicate and use the established hourly rate(s) as enumerated in Schedule 'A' of the Agreement). Fund 412 - 273512 -7006q (List all Tasks) Task 1: $ 90,774.00 Task 4: $ 13,652.00 Task 2: $ 12,076.00 Task 5: $ 7,536.00 Task 3: $118,400.00 Task 6: $ 5.000 00 Total(lump sum) $247,438.00 Any change within monetary authority of this Work Order made subsequent to final department approval will be considered an additional service and charged according to Schedule 'A' of the ��--}Agreement. _ , i PREPARED BY: P-� ' lit Z r (3 -3 Peter Schalt, PROP, Senior Project Manager Date REVIEWED BY: Ro And rson, P.E., PUED Director Date APPROVED BY: Palul tz attausch, Water Director _/ Date Date: December 19, 2003 ATTEST: (Corporate Secretary) By: Type Nam n� ` (or) itn ss (2) (,) L,1! Signature s AGE W • SCR iS Print Name Metcalf & Eddy By: `'�-- Signature 'lark S. Blanchard, Dice President cc, r-1 sc4L lk7tE -7 0 o6q,a4 Approved 9s to jo o Signature Print Name FG.3 EM 2004 Metcalf & Eddy December 18, 2003 Mr. Peter Schalt Collier County Government Center Public Utilities Engineering 3301 E. Tanvami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Subject: North County Regional Water Treatment Plant ( NCRWTP) Standby Power Distribution Upgrade Proposal for Engineering Ser, ices Dear Mr. Schalt: Metcalf & Eddy has prepared this proposat at your request to help implement the critical power system improvements at the North Cocr-- �gional Water Treatment Facility. Background The NCRWTP treatment facilities are �. n-pletely built out for a maximum plant production capacity of 20 -mgd. The existing stan� )tier system and electrical distribution system is completely built out to support the total _-', nLd process electrical load. The existing configuration does not provide the means :,.r expansion of the electrical distribution system or standby generator system. The current electrical distribution s% s., mists of four separate incoming utility sources serving essentially four separate electrical ._'Snbution systems. Each system serves approximately one fourth of the treatm.:.. ; ant loads including approximately one fourth of the treatment capacity. Each of the electn:: i i suibution systems includes a dedicated diesel engine driven generator connected to 'a switchgear. The four systems are independent, anti .::: nay cannot be interconnected to achieve any level of redundancy or increase in system relia'e. .: or operational flexibility. If any one of the standby generators is out of service or fails to c - the plant treatment capacity would be reduced by 20 to 30 percent. Worst case would be �) ss of three membrane softening skids or two reverse osmosis skids depending on which gen", or is unavailable. All the equipment connected to the - -- -main switchgear - that- the- failed- gererat- _onnected -to would not -be available.------- -- - The County desires that the emergence er system be reconfigured to allow any generator to supply power to any of the main switc::_...r. This will require new paralleling switchgear and interconnecting bus ducts to allow all r, .r � , itchgear to be connected to all four generators. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. 3740 Executive Way zone: 954 -450 -7770 Miramar, Florida 333025 ax: 954 -450 -5100 AGENDA ITEM _ NO. //, el JAN 1 3 2004 PG. 4 Mr. Peter Schalt December 18, 2003 Page 2 This plan, defined as a limited parallel connection per the Technical Design Memorandum dated January 23, 2003, consists of connecting each generator to a new generator paralleling switchgear with new feeders to the existing switchgears. The paralleling switchgear bus would be rated for 6,000 amps to accommodate the full load current of two generators in parallel. A tie breaker would split the paralleling bus to enable simultaneous limited parallel operation of all four generators. This project will provide operational flexibility with respect to which generators are serving the plant load. Construction can be implemented with minimal interruption to plant production. We estimate that switchgear fabrication and delivery (20 weeks) will be the critical path item in completing the project. Based on the time for construction, the optimum schedule is: 60% Design 90% Design Design Complete Bidding and Award Construction Engineering Services January 5, 2004 to February 27, 2004 March 1, 2004 to March 26, 2004 March 29, 2004 to April 30, 2004 May 3, 2004 to July 30, 2004 August 2, 2004 to May 27, 2005 We propose to develop construction documents to allow advertising the contract for bid by the end of April of next year. The following is a description of the tasks required for this project. Design and Bidding Services 1.0 Design Services. Design services will include field studies and site visits, preliminary layouts and technical memoranda, followed by detailed design document production. Options for siting of the new switchgear will be presented in a design workshop to be conducted on site within three weeks of notice to proceed. 1.1 Field Studies /Site Visit. Existing systems investigation will be conducted. Investigations of existing equipment conditions, ratings, characteristics, protective relay settings, circuit breaker settings, and electrical distribution systems equipment verifications will be conducted. The existing building roof structure will be evaluated for consideration of switchgear placement. 1.2 Design Meetings. Attend regularly scheduled meetings with the County to coordinate the work. work. It is assumed that monthly meetings will be held to coordinate the 1.3 Contract Documents. Detailed design will consist of preparation of HVAC, structural, electrical and instrumentation drawings. Standard details will also be prepared. Drawings will be prepared using AutoCAD format. No. AG ; IT^ EM C NN LL JAN 3�2004Z VG. S Mr. Peter Schalt December 18, 2003 Page 3 The technical specifications will be prepared in conformance with the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) format. M &E's standard master construction specifications will be used as the basis for the technical specifications for the project. Suitable manufacturers and suppliers will be identified for each specified item. The County's latest front end documents will be utilized for the General and Special Conditions sections of the documents. Requirements for special provisions will be carefully evaluated with the County. 14 Desien Reviews. Provide for design review with the County staff at the 60 %, and 90% completion milestone. An allowance of eight copies of the documents will be provided to the County for review purposes for each design review. M &E will incorporate the County's comments into the final plans and specifications. 1.5 QA/QC Reviews. Provide for internal design review at the 30 %, 60 %, 90% and 100% completion milestones. 1.6 Construction Staging and Sequencing. Prepare a construction and sequencing plan for the work to ensure minimal interruption to the plant operations during construction. 1 ,AZ, Opinion of Probable Cost. Provide detailed opinion of project probable cost prior 1-0-completion. An opinion of probable cost will be provided at the 90 percent review submittal to allow changes necessary to accommodate project budget to be made prior to bid. A final opinion of project probable cost will be provided at the submission of final bid documents. 1.8 FPL Coordination. Coordinate with Florida Power & Light for the design of the interconnection facilities and to assist them Aith their engineering study. Deliverables: • Draft (60% and 90 %) and final plans and specifications. • Reproducible documents for County's use to prepare bid sets. • Construction cost estimate at 90 %, and 100% submittal. 2.0 Bid Phase Services. M &E will provide bid phase services to the County consisting of -_- - — — --attendance at the pre= bid - meeting; response to bidder inquirie §, preparation of addenda and review of bids. The final drawings will be produced in full and half -size mylar and bond sets for the County's use. A full set of print -ready specifications will be provided. The County will issue bid document packages and distribute to prospective bidders. AGENDA ITEM ?40. 16 e— _-) JAN 1 3 2004 PG. Mr. Peter Schalt December 18, 2003 Page 4 2.1 Pre -Bid Meeting. A pre -bid conference and a project site tour will be conducted. Questions will be logged and appropriate responses will be either given at the conference and/or in addenda. 2.2 Respond to Questions and Issue Addenda Provide interpretation and clarification of contract documents during bidding. Issue addendum as necessary to achieve this objective. 2.3 Evaluate Bids. Bid packages will be reviewed for completeness and appropriateness for award, and a recommendation will be made for award of the construction contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Deliverables: • Attendance at pre -bid meeting • Addenda as required; recommendation for award. • M &E will provide 5 signed and sealed sets of drawings and specifications for the County's use and for the successful bidder's use in obtaining the required building permits. Construction and Startup Services 3.0 Construction Services. Construction services will consist of construction administration, office engineering, and field inspection. The Resident Project Representative (RPR) will perform the daily construction administration duties. The RPR will also coordinate observation of construction, assembly of warranties and manufacturers' installation certifications, final inspection, and maintaining one set of marked construction drawings reflecting field changes based on information provided by the contractor. 3.1 Attendance at Construction Prc ~r;,s; M &E will attend a preconstruction conference to assist in explaining construction administration procedures. M &E will also attend progress meetings with the County representatives and the Contractor's representatives to review brief status reports prepared by M &E. 3.2 Review of Submittals M &E's review of required Contractor submittals will include the following activities: • Review shop drawing packages submitted by the Contractor to determine general conformance to the Contract Documents. • Review equipment and/or materials submitted by the Contractor as substitutions to those specified in the Contract Documents. F �6Et�(6'k JAN 1 3 ?%14 F . Mr. Peter Schalt December 18. 2003 Page 5 3.3 Issue Clarifications. M &E will issue clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents as required. M &E will respond to requests for information (RFI) by the Contractor. M &E will prepare supplementary drawings required to resolve actual field conditions encountered. 3.4 Change Order Negotiation and Recommendation. M &E will assist the County to negotiate the scope and cost of change orders with the contractor, and provide recommendations to the County on approval of change requests. Reviews will address conformance to original design concepts and cost- effectiveness. 3.5 Review Pay Requests. M &E will evaluate and recommend payment for monthly pay requests received from the Contractor. .2 .6 Review Materials and Workmanship. Review materials and workmanship used on the project for compliance with the contract documents. 3.7 Project Inspection. M &E will provide part time and full time inspection as necessary for the 10 month construction period. Due to the long lead time for the equipment, we anticipate full time inspection for the final 8 weeks of construction. 3.8 Main - z and Prepare Project Documents. Monitor, prepare and maintain all project records, in�,uding correspondence, schedules, construction records, progress photographs, etc. 3.9 Review O&M, Schedules, Warranties, etc. M &E will review Contractor submittals including Operations and Maintenance manuals, schedules, warrantees and guarantees. Review will address completeness and compliance with the Contract Documents. 3.10 Field Inspection for Final Certification. M &E will provide field inspection services necessary to certify the project. At the fruition of the project, key members of the design team will conduct a final inspection for the work with the County's representatives and recommend the County's acceptance of the work when the work generally conforms with the original design intent. M &E will prepare a final inspection checklist. 3.11 Record Drawings. At the completion of the project, and upon receipt of marked up drawings from the Contractor, M &E will prepare and provide the County with one set of reproducible record drawings, one set on diskette in AutoCAD format and four sets of Signed and -_ sealed -bond record drawings. -_ 3.12 Project Close Out. M &E will review final documentation and prepare close -out change orders, etc. AGENDA ITEM No. I& e_ `S JAN 1 3 1004 PG. 9 _ Mr. Peter Schalt December 18, 2003 Page 6 Deliverables: • Copies of plans and specifications • Monthly progress reports • Project certification • Record drawings 4.0 Startup Services. Startup services will include O &M Manual preparation, Operations Training, and Start-Up Services. A description of these tasks follows. 4.1 Operations and Maintenance Manual. M &E will prepare a customized operations and maintenance manual for this project. The manual will be developed for the current and future operations staff with learning aids as necessary to facilitate operations oversight. The manual will be written in a style that plant operators can easily understand. Five (5) copies of the draft O &M manual will be submitted to the County for review. Corrections, changes and/or additions requ 1 to address start -up conditions will be incorporated, and five (5) copies of the fine anual will be provided in hard cover, three -ring binders. 4.2 Operation and Maintenance Training. M &E will provide training for the operations and maintenance staff on the switchgear improvements. We will prepare lesson plans and training aids for use in training classes. The training will complement and be coordinated with training to be provided by equipment vendors. 4.3 Svstem Start-Up. M &E will conduct a systems checkout, including troubleshooting of equipment and instrumentation. This checkout alerts plant staff to any correcti.nn or adjustments that should be made to ensure an efficient start-up. We will provide on -site advice and troubleshooting throughout the start-up. Deliver • Five copies of draft and final O &M manuals • Training materials 5.0 One Year Follow -up Services. Follow -up services to include site visits and technical support to plant operations staff. Operational reports and system historical data will be reviewed on aperiodic basis to ensure the system is functioning properly. AGEF40A ITEM NO. /Ge AN 1 3 2004 AG. g__ Mr. Peter Schalt December 18, 2003 Page 7 5.1 Site Visits. We anticipate up to four site visits to review the operation of the system, and to investigate any problems or areas of concern with plant operations staff. 5.2 Follow -up Documentation. Site visits will be documented and trip reports will be provided to summarize any problems encountered and to provide recommendations to resolve problems or improve the operation of the system Deliverables: • Trip reports 1 -year certification report Engineering Expenses and Schedule Design and Bidding Services. We propose to perform the proposed services in two phases, Design and Bidding Services, and Constr.. tion and Startup Services. We propose to complete the Design and Bidding Services for the lump sum fee of $102,850.00. FPL Engineering Study. Florida Power L:,,ht Company (FPL) requires an engineering study to set up parallel operation of the County s standby power generation system and the FPL power grid. The engineering study will be conduc- by the FPL engineering department. They will review M &E's design of the interconr.-c:: ,cilities and protection equipment and will evaluate their equipment and design n_% _..ciiities to accommodate the interconnection. We recommend that $5,000.00 be budgeted . ::`,e FPL Engineering Study. Construction and Start-up Services. 't pose to complete Construction and Start-up Services at a unit lump sum fee of $13,205., % -_� h for a total of 10 months ($132,052.00), from the preconstruction meeting to the final «a'.•: ,.-ough and engineering certification. Construction services will cover office engineering = t, up to 8 weeks of full -rime inspection, monthly progress meetings, start-up services anti ,.t-act closeout. Construction Services would be billed fixed annual term contract. Additioi-i . only in the event that the Contractor's Follow -up Services. Follow -up sere is proposed on a lump sum basis. We cover up to four site visits. n i monthly basis in accordance with the terms of our iv fees of $13,200.00 per month would be charged n coon period exceeds 10 months. a period of one year after system start-up is approximately $7,536.00 for follow -up services to Total engineering fees for this proiect r.d be $247,438.00 for design and bidding services, the FPL engineering study, construction ;.r.; Lt -up services, and follow -up services. We recommend a contingency of S26 for an additional two months of construction services on a lump sum basis. With a,_:,.. i ,. -ation by January 2, 2004, we will complete the AGENDA ITEM NO. /et; JAN 1 3 2004 PG. / O Mr. Peter Schalt December 18, 2003 Page 8 design ready for bidding by April 30, 2004. The schedule of fees is shown in the enclosed schedule. We look forward to discussing this project in further detail with you. Should you have any questions, or require additional information regarding this project or our proposed scope of services, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, METCALF & EDDY, INC. Marc Blanchar Vice President Enclosures Cc: Nick Cooper Frank: O'Hara AGENDA I�T7EM IYO.- JAN 1 3 2004 PG.1-_-�- ---- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE A TOURIST DEVELOPMENT CATEGORY "A" BEACH RENOURISHMENT / MAINTENANCE GRANT APPLICATION, A BUDGET AMENDMENT, AND AN ENGINEERING SERVICES WORK ORDER TO SEEK MODIFICATION TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PERMIT FOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF WIGGINS PASS, PROJECT 90522, IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000 OBJECTIVE: To approve a grant application, Budget Amendment and Work Order to modify the existing permit for the dredging of Wiggins Pass with the goal of reducing the erosional stress on Barefoot Preserve. CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) is the agency that regulates coastal dredging activities in Florida. Wiggins Pass was first dredged in 1984, and subsequent maintenance dredging of the entrance of the channel occurred several times between 1991 and 2000. Between March and July of 2000 it was widened, deepened, and realigned. Several storms struck the area in the Summer/Fall of 2002, and resulted in shoaling in the area that had been maintenance dredged in March 2002. Emergency dredging in that area was then performed in December 2002 to restore navigability. Early in 2003, the Friends of Barefoot Beach approached the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department with a request to take action concerning the erosion of Barefoot Preserve on both the Gulf and bay sides at Wiggins Pass. Humiston & Moore Engineers has proposed studying the feasibility of realigning the channel from the present curved shape to take the faster currents away from Barefoot Preserve and the installation of several T- groins to control erosion. This would involve a modification to the existing FDEP permit. Additionally, the material is anticipated to be beach compatible and, with a modification to the permit, may be used for re- nourishment of part of Vanderbilt Beach, which could make the project eligible for FDEP cost - sharing. The work will be done under Contract #01 -3271 (Fixed Term Engineering for Professional Engineering Services for Coastal Zone Management Projects, Work Order # HM- FT- 03 -06. The scope and fees are more fully described in the attached work order proposal. The Coastal Advisory Committee and the Tourist Development Council recommended approval of this effort at their meetings on December 11, 2003 and December 22, 2003 respectively. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $15,000 are available from the Reserves. The source of funds is the Tourist Development Tax. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Part of the feasibility study is related to T- groins along Barefoot Beach near Wiggins Pass. The Growth Management Plan (GMP) addresses the construction of structures seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line and prohibits them in most cases. Further consideration will need to be given to the GMP depending on the outcome of the feasibility study. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners approve a TDC Category "A" Grant Application and authorize a Budget Amendment in the amount of $15,000, and authorize the conclusion of negotiations and execution of an engineering services work order to modify the FDEP Maintenance Dredging Permit for Wiggins Pass in an amount not to exceed $15,000. JAN 13 2004 Executive Summary Wiggins Pass Permit Mod Page 2 SUBMITTED BY: R. Shane Cox, P.E., Senior roject Manager REVIEWED BY: Ron Hovell, P.E., Special Projects Manager Date: —AZ X91 O Date: %a D REVIEWED BY: W r (� j� �' N _ Date: wo `�-� Roy B. Anderson, Y.E., Public Utilities Engineering Director REVIEWED BY: L 4V} -LI r�% f Date: Stephen Y. arnell, Purchasing Director REVIEWED BY: _ Date: a� Jo)Dnuck, Public Services Administrator APPROVED BY: sz5� l Date: e� James W. DeLony, P.E.. Put)lic utilities Administrator AGENDA ITEM� H0. / C►► JAN 1 .3 2004 PG. .►� HUMISTON MOORE w ENGINEERS Y COASTAL A ENGINEERING DFSIGN - -_ -s-- AND PERMITTING i f - -rte' /� f - - I - � December 4 2003 I DEC v 4 i Mr. Ron Hovell, P.E. Collier County Public Utilities Engineering Department 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Building H Naples, FL 34112 5679 STRAND COURT %A'LES, FLORIDA 341 10 I;'X 239 594 2025 PHONE 239 594 2021 Re: Wiggins Pass Permit Modification Proposal, H&M File No. 13071 Dear Ron: O w 0 co cn As requested, we are providing the following proposal for modifying the maintenance dredging permit for Wiggins Pass. The purpose of the modification is to dredge , the channel across the flood shoal to obtain sand for the renourishment of a portion Vanderbilt Beach and improve inlet hydraulics with the goal of reducing erosion of the Barefoot Beach side of the channel. Dredging of the channel across the flood shoal will be based on currently authorized navigation depths. Additionally, alternatives for reducing erosion of the Barefoot Beach Gulf shoreline will be evaluated. This may involve additional County permitting issues. 1. CONCEPTUAL PLAN Basic Services Gather previous surveys, monitoring reports, and aerial photographs and develop a conceptual plan for inlet improvements. The plan will consider dredging the flood shoal at a time to coincide with a scheduled maintenance dredging event. To the extent that the dredged sand is compatible with native beach sand, the disposal of sand from the flood shoal will be on Vanderbilt Beach to optimize opportunity for State funding, or on Delnor Wiggins or Barefoot Beach Park. The preliminary investigation will also consider the use of structures to stabilize the beach adjacent to the inlet. The result of the preliminary investigation will be a report which will be the basis for preapplication meetings. Submit a request to the State, along with supporting documentation, that the north side of Wiggins Pass be designated as an Area of Critical Erosion. Cost......................... ............................... $ 6,600 C Fn 0 F-3 Page 1 of 4 004 2. PRE - APPLICATION MEETINGS Basic Services Schedule workshops to obtain input from: State and County Parks staff, the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC), the local Estuarine Conservation Association, the Conservancy, the Florida Wildlife Federation, and the U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service (USF &WS), in preparation for a preapplication meeting with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Meet with DEP to discuss the permitting issues related to the conceptual plan, and discuss the scope of data collection and studies needed to support the application. Cost......................... ............................... $ 8,060 3. PRELIMINARY DESIGN Basic Services Analyze effect of dredging on inlet flow dynamics for the purpose of addressing erosion on the north side of the channel inside the inlet in the vicinity of DEP Reference Monument R -16. Compute dredge quantities for the selected excavation plan. Develop plans and. a template for the channel dredging and beach disposal on Vanderbilt Beach. Evaluate alternatives for reducing erosion of the gulf beach north of the inlet and the inlet shoreline in the vicinity of DEP Reference Monument R -16, and for potentially reducing long term maintenance dredging requirements, as well as potential environmental impacts. Prepare plans for the recommended approach. Meet with County staff to review the proposed plan and present the plan to the Coastal Advisory Committee. Cost......................... ............................... $ 23,600 Additional Services Conduct hydrographic surveys to map current bathymetry of the study area. Collect vibracores of the shoal area and native beach representative samples of the sand for grain size distribution, compatibility of the shoal sand with native beach sand. PaVCj 2 of 4 HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEcRS • NAPLES. '_'DRID.A samples, analyze and evaluate the AGENDA ITEM NO. % C La JAN t 3 2004 PG. Ll Take current measurements in the inlet tributaries to use in evaluating the potential improvements to inlet hydrodynamic stability as well as potential hydrodynamic impacts to the inlet from dredging the flood shoal. Conduct a benthic environmental study to map any grass beds or other environmental resources in the dredge area. Budget..................... ............................... $ 41,448 4. PERMITTING Basic Services Prepare application form with supporting documentation including 5 sets of signed and sealed permit drawings and submit to DEP. Cost......................... ............................... $ 2,000 Additional Services Coordination with DEP during permit application processing, respond to DEP, Corps of Engineers, FFWCC, and USF &WS requests for additional information. This may include such items as additional hydrographic surveys, environmental surveys, hydrodynamic analysis and modeling, preparation of a Biological Opinion by the USF &WS, and responding to comments from the public received by the regulatory agencies in response to the public notice. Budget..................... ............................... $ 48,000 The following is a summary of the costs Nnd " :uycts listed above: Task Conceptual Plan Pre - Application Meetings Preliminary Design Permitting Totals Basic Additional Task Total $ 6,600 $ 6,600 $ 8,060 $ 8,060 $ 23,600 $ 41,448 $ 65,048 $ 2,000 $ 48,000 50,000 $ 40,260 $ 89,448 $129,708 Please note that the DEP permit fee is not included in this budget. Based on Sections 62.4 F.A.C. and 6213-41 F.A.C., we estimate the permit fees will be in the range of $10,000 to $20,000 depending on the scope of the permitted activity. Page 3 of 4 HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS . NAP;-ES. FLORIDA [PG.— AGENDA ITEM o. /G C JAN f 3 2004 J Services will be billed on a IumP sum basis for Basic Services and on a time and materials basis for Additional Services in accordance with the fee schedule as included in our Fixed Term Professional Engineering Services for Coastal Zone Management Projects Contract #01 -3271. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS Kenneth K. Humiston, P.E. HUM!STON & MOOR_EafjGINE�ERS • NAPLES. FLORIDA AGENDf A >. IT NO. J 1.32 00! 4 PG. a l e 1.1 In Collier County Tourist Development Council GRANT APPLICATION Beach Renourishment and Pass Maintenance Wiggins Pass Dredging Permit Modification 1. Name and Address of Applicant Organization: Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 2. Contact Person, Title and Phone Number: Shane Cox, Senior Protect Manager Public Utilities Engineering Department Phone: 530 -5342 FAX: 530 -5378 3. Organization's Chief Official and Title: Commissioner Tom Henning, Chairman Board of County Commissioners 4. Project Description and location): The Florida Department of Environmental Protection_r rg it_ for the maintenance dredging of Wiggins Pass allows for the maintenance dredging of the pass seaward ° throat of the channel. At the request of the Parks & Recreation Department the consulting engineer has recommended dredging the interior portion of the channel to reduce the erosional stress on Barefoot Preserve by realigning the channel further south. This project is the engineering services phase to obtain a permit modification. AGENDA ITEM -v- JAN i 3 2004 PG._ Collier County Tourist Development Council Grant Application Page 2 5. Estimated project start date: February 2004 6. Estimated project duration: 9 months 7. Total amount requested: $15,000 8. If the full amount requested cannot be awarded, can the program/project be restructured to accommodate a smaller award? S ( ) No (X) I ROJECT BUDGET Wiggins Pass Dredging Permit Modification PROGRAM ELEMENT Engineering services TOTAL AMOUNT $15,000 $15,000 I have read the Beach Renoulishmcr, .' T,,,l Pass Guidelines and criteria and agree that my organization will comply with aii _ ,i felines and criteria Signature of Organization's Chief O ft :1 or Designee* Date: *Director of Office of Capital Prof cis Management authorized to sign Category "A" applications on behalf of the (= . i,, -fan of the Board of County Commissioners. Approved by Board of County C: - :.rnissioners on August 24, 1993, Agenda Item 16(H)(2). Director of Office of C-.r:tal Projects Management position was renamed to Director of Public Works Engineerir_r affective October 1998 and is currently Director of Public Utilities Engineering. F 04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A POLICY GOVERNING THE SALE OF RECLAIMED WATER TO THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY OBJECTIVE: Request the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the governing body of Collier County and as ex- officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District to approve a Resolution establishing a reclaimed water policy to sell reclaimed and other supplemental water exclusively to customers located both in the District and in then unincorporated areas of the County, with the possible exception of surplus reclaimed water and surplus supplemental water. CONSIDERATIONS: The purpose of this policy is to ensure that customers in the unincorporated areas of the Collier County Water -Sewer District ( "the District ") shall have exclusive priority of service and use for reclaimed and other supplemental water resources for irrigation and similar purposes. This valuable commodity must be conserved and available for the first priority use of the District's primary customer base. The policy further contemplates that it be at the County's sole discretion to sell any excess (surplus) reclaimed or surplus supplemental water to areas within the District that are then not within the unincorporated area of the County. This policy shall not affect any of the District's now existing separate written agreements to serve either such water service until the respective written service agreement is hereafter renewed or extended. Most, if not all, of these separate agreements apply to golf course communities. Reclaimed water and supplemental water are sold by the District at a cost to the District's customers as a significantly lower cost alternative than the District's sales of potable water. The user rates for reclaimed water range from $.27 to $.67 per thousand gallons depending on the type of service provided to the District's reclaimed water customers. Potable water is provided to customers of the District based on an inverted rate schedule that increases the rate per thousand gallons used based on the volume of consumption. As of October 1, 2003, the approved rate for potable water customers served by a 5 /8" or a 3/4" meter and consumption of 5,000 or fewer gallons per month is $ t.48 per thousand gallons, Alternatively, the cost for a 5/8" and a 3/4" meter ranges by blocks up to a maximum of greater than 50,000 gallons per month at $4.90 per thousand gallons (See attached Exhibit A). FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the customers of the unincorporated area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District relative to the adoption of this Resolution. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this Executive Summary. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board. of County Commissioners as the governing body of Collier County and as ex- officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, by approval of this Executive Summary: AG(NOA ITEM 40. ICc C'' q JAN 1 3 2004 Pc. _J L Adopt the attached Resolution on reclaimed water policy for the provision of reclaimed and supplemental water service; and 2. Authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Resolution. PREPARED BY: �f "'S. Thomas G. Wides, Operations Director, Public Utilities Division REVIEWED BY: Ann Marie Saylor, Op ations Analyst, Public Utilities Division DATE: / 10710,V DATE: REVIEWED BY: /ZX/ DATE: r 7 D y Ro ert Casey, Reuse Co rdinator, Wastewater Department, Public Utilities Division REVIEWED BY: - DATE: 1-7-04 Jo h C eatham, Wastewater Director, Pub is Utilities Division APPROVED BY: r I...... LN ' DATE: ' IZ W. DeLony, P.E., Adryiinistrator Utilities Division AGENDA ITEM No. / jQ C' i JAN 1 3 2004 PG. EXHIBIT "A" Collier County Water -Sewer District Water/Wastewater Rate Study Update Water System RATE SUMMARY WATER SERVICE AVAILABILITY CHARGES (Residential, Multi - Family, Commercial, and Irrigation Only) Meter Size 518" 3/4" 1" 1 -1l4" 1 -1l2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8„ 10" 12" VOLUME CHARGE PER 1,000 GALLONS (Residential, Multi - Family, Commercial, and Irrigation Only) Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 Block 5 Block 6 BLOCK RATE STRUCTURE (Residential, Multi - Family, Commercial, and Irrigation Only) Effective Effective October 1, 2003 October 1, 2004 $ 12.30 Block 1 Block 2 Meter Size $ 12.60 5/8" 5,000 10,000 3/4" 5,000 10,000 1" 12,000 25,000 1 -1/4" 20,000 40,000 1 -1/2" 25,000 50,000 2" 40,000 80,000 3" 80,000 160,000 4" 120,000 250,000 6" 250,000 500,000 8" 450,000 900,000 10" 700,000 1,450,000 12" 1,075,000 2,150,000 Effective Effective October 1, 2003 October 1, 2004 $ 12.30 $ 12.60 $ 12.30 $ 12.60 S 27.10 $ 27.80 $ 34.40 $ 35.20 $ 51.70 $ 53.00 $ 81.20 $ 83.20 $ 150.10 $ 153.80 $ 248.50 $ 254.60 $ 494.50 $ 506.60 $ 789.70 $ 809.00 $ 1,429.30 $ 1,464.20 $ 1,930.50 $ 1,977.60 $ 1.48 $ 1.54 $ 2.10 $ 2.20 $ 2.70 $ 2.90 $ 3.40 $ 3.70 $ 4.10 $ 4.50 $ 4.90 $ 5.50 Consumation Block - UD To Or Next Block 3 Block 4 20,000 30,000 20,000 30,000 50,000 75,000 80,000 120,000 100,000 150,000 160,000 240,000 320,000 480,000 500,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 1,800,000 2,700,000 2,900,000 4,300,000 4,300,000 6,450,000 Block 5 Block 6 50,000 Over 50,000 50,000 Over 50,000 120,000 Over 120,000 200,000 Over 200,000 250,000 Over 250,000 400,000 Over 400,000 800,000 Over 800,000 1,200,000 Over 1,200,000 2,500,000 Over 2,500,000 4,500,000 Over 4,500,000 7,000,000 Over 7,000,000 11,000,000 Over 11,000,000 (') Proposed rates to become effective with service rendered on and after October 1st of each fiscal year indicated. AGENDA ITE N0. JAN 13 2004 PG. RESOLUTION NO. 2004 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMAIISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ADOPT A POLICY GOVERNING SALE OF RECLAIMED WATER ONLY TO UNINCORPORATED AREAS WITHIN COLLIER COUNTY WHEREAS, the Collier County Water - Sever District desires to adopt a reclaimed water policy to sell reclaimed and other supplemental v,ater exclusively to customers in the unincorporated areas of Collier County to protect and obtain the best usage of this limited resource; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Comprehensive Plan mandates dual water services for all new developments and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection mandates that each wastewater utility shall have a disposal of reuse program based on the number of customers served by the utility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMINUSSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. that: The Collier County Water -Sewer District (District) shall provide reclaimed and/or supplemental water service only pursuant to separate v� ri:ten agreement applicable to each respective clearly defined and described reclaimed and other supplemental water service area !ocatcd within the then existing boundaries of the District. and no such agreement shall authorize or allow the District to supply reclaimed water or supplemcrtai %%ater to any area then situate cithin the geographic boundaries of a municipality. \!so. _,:cn such agreement entered into, renewed or extended by the District after the effective date ref this Resolution shall include the following provision: "In the event that all or any part of i,.d area to be served %with reclaimed water pursuant to this agreement is annexed i �,, :nicipal corporation, either party ro this agreement shall have the absolute right, %rithout -abiiity whatsoever to the other party or to any other individuals or entities, to terminate this i_-," 'I: :r,ed and other supplemental water service to the area annexed into the municipality by «i� other party to the agreement not less than ninety (90) days and no more than three hundred :d sixty -five (365) days advance written notice of the terminating party's decision to t i-^! i;is reclaimed and other supplemental water service to the geographic area into it municipality." Should an excess amount of reclaimed or other < .....! _� mental water, or both, become u% iilahle to the District in the future whereby there -.o � iable demand for such surplus reclaimed or surplus other supplemental water, or huh, it_:re in the then unincorporated area :;i C.>Ilier County, the District will consider the possi i : _ding only such surplus reclaimed and surplus other supplemental water to service areas -,,� :t rtuate outside the then existing unincorporated area of the County. This Resolution is adopted after motion, seccn,i najonty vote favoring adoption this day of January 2004. ATTEST BOARD t � '.\'FY COMMISSIONERS Dwight E. Brock, Clerk COLI-IF? : ; i "1,TY, FLORIDA, EX- OFFICIO T l k_ BOARD OF TIE COLLIER COU :NTY 1 ER -SEWER DISTRICT By By:__ Deputy Clerk _ Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attornev AG NOR ITEM NO. JAN 1 3 0004 D6. 4 _] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT WITH STOCK DEVELOPMENT, LLC FOR THE INSTALLATION OF UPGRADED SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING AT EAGLE LAKES COMMUNITY PARK AT NO COST TO COLLIER COUNTY Obieetive: To provide high- quality recreation experiences to the residents of Collier County while maintaining County parks' status as good neighbors. Considerations: On October 28, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners approved an agreement with Stock Development, LLC under which Stock Development agreed to install upgraded lights and lighting fixtures at Eagle Lakes Community Park in an effort to reduce the glare within Lely Resort from the park's sport field lights. It has since been discovered that the existing light poles have insufficient wind load capacity for the recommended fixtures. The lighting contractor instead recommends installation of glare shields or visors on the existing 221 fixtures. An amendment to the agreement reflecting this change in scope of services has been prepared and approved as to legal sufficiency by the Office of the County Attorney. Fiscal Impact: No fiscal impact is associated with this action. Growth Management Impact: No Growth Management Impact is associated with this action. Recommendation: That the Board of County Commissioners approves the amendment to the agreement with Stock Development, LLC for the upgrade of sports field fighting at Eagle Lakes Community Park, and authorize the chairman to sign. Submitted by: _� � Date: <,�nda O. To send, 6perations Ckiordinator Parks and Recreati(i Department Reviewed by: ICJ Date a Marla O. Ramsey, Dire P s nd Recreation epart ent Approved by: n Date: Job unnuck, Administrator Div] ion of Public Services �- Agenda Item JAN 1 3 2Q04 i pg, i FIRST ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT ADDENDUM to the Agreement between Stock Development LLC, (Contractor), and the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ( "County ") WHEREAS, the County and the Contractor entered in to an agreement to provide improved lighting at Eagle Lakes Community Park on October 28, 2003; and WHEREAS, this addendum to the agreement provides a modification of the scope of services, more specifically, the installation of glare shields instead of lighting fixtures; and WHEREAS, the County is agreeable and the Contractor has volunteered to pay for the glare shields and labor to perform the service; and WHEREAS, the County agrees to maintain the shields installed at the park site upon completion of the work; NOW, therefore, in consideration of the promises and mutual convents hereinafter contained, the Contractor hereby agrees to undertake said services outlined below. Section A, Scope of Services, Article 1 shall be amended to read, "Stock Development, LLC, agrees to be responsible for the installation of approximately 221 light shields at the site identified by the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department as the sports field of the Eagle Lakes Community Park (hereinafter, 'the site')." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and County, have each, by and authorized individual executed this ADDENDUM to the -AGREEMENT this day of 2004. Witnesses: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Approved as to form and Legal sufficiency: Robert N. Zachary Assistant County Attorney STOCK DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Flo -ida Limited Liability any, By: aging Me mber BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairman Agend Item No. No. lam_ JAN 1 3 2004 Pg. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APROVE WORK ORDER # SC- 02 -57, CONTRACT 02 -3349 IN THE AMOUNT OF $77,247.00 TO SURETY CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL CONTRACTORS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SCREEN PORCH ADDITION AT THE MARCO ISLAND LIBRARY. OBJECTION: Board approval of Work Order # SC 02 -57, issued to Surety Construction Company, General Contractors for construction of the screen room addition at the Marco Island Library. CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier County Public Library, Marco Branch, has a need for a screen porch to be added to the library facility. This screen porch will enhance the enjoyment of the Library for the residents of Marco Island. The Library received $150,000 in donations to fund this project and other future projects to enhance the Marco Island Branch Library. Quotations were obtained under the General Contractors contract (02 -3349) for this addition. Staff has reviewed the quotes and recommends awarding the contract to the low bidder. Quotes were received from:. • William J. Varian $112,500 • Chris -Tel Company $110,578 • Surety Construction $ 77,247 FISCAL IMPACT: The donated funds for this project are available in the Library's Trust Fund budget. (Fund 612) GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact on the County Growth management Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve Work Order # SC- 02 -57, and authorize the Faciliti s Dire to sign the work order. C� SUBMITTE Date: Jo n . Jone Libr y Director REVIEWD BY: !'' T� {j'� Date: Skip Camp, Director Facilities Management Department REVIEWED BY: ' ` '' Date: Steve Cornell, Director Purchasing Department i APPROVED BY. -�1� Date: John Dunnuck, Administrator Public Services Division Agenda .Item JAN 1 tuts, Pry EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONCERNING THE SALE AND TRANSFER OF ITEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COUNTY SURPLUS AUCTION OF DECEMBER 13, 2003, RESULTING IN $9,482.90 IN NET REVENUES. OBJECTIVE: To present the results of the recent County property auction to the Board of County Commissioners for ratification. CONSIDERATION: On November 18, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners authorized staff to conduct an auction of specified County -owned assets for the purpose of disposing of these items and generating revenues for the County. The December 13, 2003 auction generated $10,307.50 in actual gross revenues and $9,482.90 in net revenues. The auctioneer's commission is $824.60. This auction included office equipment, an odor control fan system, and a generator. FISCAL IMPACT: Net revenues have been allocated as follows: DEPARTMENT FUND ALLOCATED_ REVENUES Solid Waste 470 $ 634.80 Water Operations 408 $ 5,060.00 General Fund 001 $ 4,( ' ?.70 3, r ,_ .10 + 824.60 – Auctioneer's Fee GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This will not affect the Growth Management Impact. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners accept and ratify the revenues for the County Auction held on December 13, 2003, pursuant to the itemized sales report attached herein. SUBMITTED BY: Sue Hebbe Purchasing Technician Date: LZ Z 3 / o __� 1 REVIEWED BY: G�� _ Date: / Z�� 1 Steph n Y. Car ell Purchasing /General Services Director APPROVED BY: — Date: Len Pri e, Administrator Administrative Services Division cia AGEN�)� ITEM JAN 1 3 2004 P 9 • __Z ______ ~ FIRST COAST A&CTZ[M S REWTY IMC P O BOX 7E73 au � 2�� a107-I JAC�SONV�LL�, FL[RII�A 32236 W-772-1110 Fax: 904-777-B387 Web: Emaill fcar��elIsouti�.ns� 5210ion ovp.^view oage Tows Sold willed Premium Taxes Tax rcvd. Not taw-- ______________________________________________________________________________ Tox \' 157 nD307.50 1D012.Ez - 3522.50 215.55 6428.00 -0 Cas�: 4643.25 Ch10A, 5E3 4.80 Tztal: 10228.O5 AGEWA ITEM JAN 1 3 2004 OZIR-2::T sm s t- I D 0 0 L7- 00 I rl s 7— 158 1 1z, G TC 8 3 00 1.0. IN, 7: :7 -7 t S S 7 Et C'-i IP I R S tz li A G T A,6i 1E NO. JAN 13 2004 Pg. Date: 12-13-2003 FIRST COAST AUCTION & REALTY, INC P O BOX 7878 au286 a6150 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32238 904-772-0110 Fax: 904-777-8387 Web: www.firstcoastauctiun.pom Email: fcar@bellsouth.net ~� III buyers page Name ____________________________________________________________________ Items Total 308 JOHN MURPHY 2471 PINE ST S 239-250-8208 NAPLES FL 33962 1 Win CHAIR 10.00 41 LAP TOP 25.00 2 35.00 0.3% 310 CLARENCE COGDELL PO BOX 772037 352-207-8523 OCALA FL 34477 48A 16 elec boxes 5.00 1 5.00 0.0% 312 JAMES ROBINSON 710 23RD ST SW 239-304-5439 NAPLES FL 34117 ' 13 5 bLUE AND BLACK CHAIR-j 5.00 1 5.00 0.0% 313 PHILLIP WOHLK 5015 MOHAGANY RIDGE DR 239-353-1127 NAPLES FL 34119 47 TONSMITTER 200.00 33 11 CPU CARDS& 2 CAL � . 375.00 35 TABLE `OP OF MISC 55.00 , 38 MI SC. EQ 1W0.@0 71 Table top mont. 70.00 77 TABLE TOP 70.00 125 TABLE TOP MISC. 5.00 -- 7 875.0N 8.5% 314 JOSE DURAN � 1230 BROOKSIDE DR 239-775-7214 NAPLES, FL 34104 8 3 misc chairs 5.00 9 3 off chaira sold with item 8 2 315 HENRY ELKINS 700 100TH AVE 239-598-2046 NAPLES FL 34106 � 28 2 wORD PROSSORS 20.00 29 2 WORD PROSSORS sold with item 28 2 20.00 0.2% 317 LOUIS JEAN WlNTON ~_ AGETIEM No. TA 77i i7771 JAN 13 2004 IHST COAST AUCTION & 6` INC -- P O BOX 7878 au28-'�b150 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32238 904-772-0110 Fax: 904-777-838'7 Web: www.firstcoastauction.pom Email: fcar@bellsouth.net All buyers F f ... ..... ___ It. ems_______Total_________ 4910 CATLlNA DR 239-417-0385 NAPLES, FL 34112 8o 6 monitors 00.00 1 8W.00 0.8� 318 GE2HER GABCUH 5238 |iARTIN ST 239-774-0386 NAPLES FL 34l13 63 9 SIONlTORS &printer 50. 00 323 STANEY VIVA 405 12TH AVE NW MAPLES, FL 34120 43 TOP 326 GERARDO GARCIA-SANCHEZ 3131 TAMlAMI TRL LOT 47 NAPLES, FL 34113 14 10 GREEN CHAIRS 15 4 RED CHAIRS 16 3 MISC CHAIRS 331 DAVID TEPER 686 101ST AVE N NAPLES FL 34108 26 I"IOKROE CALCULATORS 333 JOSEPH PINKOSKI 3561 TRL DAIRY CIR N FT MYERS FL 33917 44 LAP TO& 60 MONITDIRS 65 Printers & fax 334 EDWARD BLACKBURN JR PO BOX 10301 NAPLES FL 34101 � 4 2 oOLD CHAIRS 17 4 GOLD CHAIRS 239-272-2956 140.00 1 50.01-71 0.5� 1 140.00 1.Q 239-441-5529 4N.00 5.00 sold with item 15 3 239-287-2341 5.00 239-567-2256 50.00 45.00 110.00 239-775-3711 2.50 5.00 45.00 0.4; 1 3.00 0.07 ^ 3 205.00 2.07 2 7.50 0.17 JAN 13 2004 Date: 12-13-2003 FIRST COAST AUCTION & REALTY, INC P O BOX 7878 au286 ab150 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32238 904-772-0110 Fax: 904-777-8387 ~~� Web: www.firstcoastauction.pom Email: fcar@bellsouth.net Ail buyers page -------- Name --------------------------------------------------------------------- Items Total 336 ARMANDO TREJO 148 SAN REMO AVE 239-649-0873 NAPLES FL 34104 39 LAN TOP 168.Q@ 1 160.00 1.6|{ 338 DONALD BROWN 178 VINTAGE CR #101 239-343-8113 NAPLES FL 34119 62 CA6TRIDGES 100 MICROWAVE 10.001 101 FAX sold with item 100 102 PROJECTOR & TABLE 3.00 4 340 ANA GARCIA-MARTINEZ 2163 HUNTER BLVD #D 239-348-/251 NAPLES FL 34116 � 3 2 oLUE CHAIRS 2.30 23 PRINTER DESK Z.�W 24 PRINTER DESK sold with item 23 23 PRINTER DESK sold xith item 23 46 VIDEO CASS. & TRI PO D 6; vw`00 '�� 4 printers " 84 Printer table 3-O0 93 FILE CAB 3^O� 96 FILE CAB 97 FILE CAB sold n�th item 96 1l0 13 TYPEWRITERS ^ .'.�0 ` 12 102.50 1.0� 341 OSELER BASTIEN PO BOX 8357 NAPLES FL 34101 �39-L0l'0682 37 LAS TOP i "0 1 15.00 342 ERNEST KERSKIE 4475 3RD AVE NW 239-�@4-9901 NAPLES FL 341l9 36 LA?-_1 TOP ' 3� Wo 51 MISC 20^W0 59 DESK '^ 5.�'. 1@ 78 DESK & 2 MONIT. 'j �� 113 TABLE TOPMISC PRINT �'~ �.00 AGENDA ITEM JAN 13 2004 IRST COAST AUCTION & , INC -- P O BOX 7878 au286`-�b150 JACKSONVILLE� FLORIDA 32206� 904-772-0110 F*x: 90419979 W], Web: www.firstcoastauction.pom Email: fcar@bellsouth.net All buyers pp~- Name Items Total ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 115 UNDER TAABLE MONIT. sojd with item 113 6 65.00 0.6� 343 SAMUEL ALEMAN 2081 44TH TERRACE BE 239-821-1725 NAPLES, FL 34116 10 8 rose off chairs 50.00 11 12 SWIVAL CHAIRS sold with item 10 48F WORK STATIONS & MISC 5.00 �k 344 ROBERT CADENHEAD 895 11TH ST NORTH NAPLES; FL 34102 40 f` TOP 200 WIND MACHINE * 200B 3 wind machines 201 150 HP MOTOR 202 10 HP ELEC MOTOR 203 10 HP ELEC MOTOR 204 10 HP ELEC MOTOR 205 10 HP ELEC MOTOR 206 10 HP ELEC MOTOR 207 10 HP ELEC MOTOR 208 10 HP ELEC MOTOR 209 ELEC MOTOR STARTERS & MIS 210 4 SWITCH BOXES 350 JOSEPH VERBANAC 131 CARICA RD NAPLES FL 34108 12 3 NOSE CHAlkS 352 DANIEL DESTINE 8001 BAYSHORE DH NAPLES, FL 3411 2 31 10 PRINTERS 57 PRINTER 354 FLVIS BARRERA 206 BENSON ST NAPLES, FL 34113 20 2 MAROON CHAIRS 3 55.0(9 239-85-8790 100.00 1i0.60 1W0.00 75.00 l0. NW 60.00 sold with item 203 sold with item 203 sold with item 203 sold with item 203 snld with item 203 225.0111 11N.00 13 790.00 � 239-598-2224 5.G0 1 5.00 239-431-9568 25.016 9W.00 2 i15.W0 229-774-5654 20.00 0. 51A 7.7IX ° AGENDA No. 09 �� °,�m , - ---' pg'-__�Z_-- oate: 1&- 'LA-Zym., FIRST AUCTION & REALTY INC JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA Z2236 904-772-W110 Fax: 904-777-8387 Web: www.firstcoastauction.pom Email: fcar@bellsouth.net ~�^ All huyers pag/ N ame Items ' Total ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21 2 STACKING CHAIRS 5.00 22 3 ROSE CHAIRS sold with item 21 3 25.00 0.2� 355 RONALD DEVARISTE 11485 WHISTLERS COVE CIR 239-403-9926 NAPLES FL 34103 42 LAN TOP 45.00 1 45.00 0.4 359 JAMES THOMPSON 100 BAREFOOT WILLIAMS 239-417-1223 NAPLES, FL 34113 488 SHELVING 2 STACKS ' 5.00 1 5.00 0.01 360 CHARLOTTE SAHAFIANOS 419 CROSSFlELD CIR 239-263-3525 NAPLES FL 34104 5.00 TAbLETOP 89 3 PRINTERS 30.0W 90 FILE CAB 10.00 3 45.00 0.4 361 LORI NOVICK 576 99TH AVE 239-598-4559 NAPLES FL 34108 49 DEW 8 CAB. 2.50 64 File cab 5.00 � 2 7.50 0.1 _ 363 EMILY NATHEWS 12552 SW 259 ST 30-258-7575 MIAMI, FL 33032 124 Chalk board 15.00 1 15.00 ° 0.1 364 JOHN MCELEVEEN 13800 JACKSON ST 305-255-9790 MIAMI FL 33176 45 UP TOP �' 45.00 1 45.00 0.4 365 ADRAIN SIMMONS SHUKY LASER PRODUCTS CORP 223336 SW 103 AVE 305-244-4463 MIAMI, FL 3190 0 0 AGEqOA ITEM JAN 13 2004 3RST COAST AUCTION INC -~ P O BOX 7878 au286`~ab 50 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32238 904-772-0110 Fax: 904-777-8387 Web: www.firstcuastauction.pom Email: fcar@bellsouth.net All buyers paq* Name Items Total ---'---------------------------------------------------------'---------------- 48D FORMS BURSTER 5.00 61 MONITORS 55.00 67 Table top monitors 30.00 69 Table top monters 130.00 73 8 MMONT. TABLE TOP 10.00 75 MON. on tog of table top 110.00 79 PRINTER & 5.0W 87 FILE CQB l5. W0 103 MAILING MACHINE 5.00 104 TABLE TOP MONIT 40.00 105 UNDER TABLE MISC 20.00 106 UNDER TABLE NISC sold with item 105 112 UNDER TABLE 10.00 116 H.P. PRINTER 80.00 117 H.P. PRINTER sold with item 116 118 SCANNER & PARTS sold with item 116 130 TABLE TOP PRINTERS ET., 5.00 131 UNDER TABLE MONITORS 40.00 133 UNDER TABLE 6 NON. 30.00 19 590.00 5.7� 366 GARY COOK 509 ORCHARD -NAPLES FL 341 121 TAILE TOP CP ETC 122 TABLE & PAHTS 126 TABLE TOP MIS('., 368 ROBERT AXELSON 1811 21ST SW NAPLES FL 34117 108 2 tables 109 UNDER TABLE MISC 374 ROLDIMY MONTINAR PO BOX 990667 NAPLES FL 34116 �� 82 PH"..ES 83 PHONES 376 JOHN DIMANCO III 2978 POPLAR ST NAPLES, FL 34112 239-774-4654 110.00 sold with item 121 35.00 I- 210-455-5437 5.00 30.00 3 145.00 1.47 2 35.00 0.3; ~ 39-353-7857 40.00 sold with item 82 2 40.00 0. 4", 239-732-1693 LAGENOA ITE�M tNo JAN 3 2004 u"^=^ ^" `w'-w°� FIRST COAST AUCTION & REALTY, INC P O BOX 7878 ' au286 ab150 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDn 32238 �04-772-011W Fax: 904-777-8387 Web: www.f1rstcoastauction.pom Email: fcar@bellsouth.net ~_ All buyers page Name _______________________._________________Items_______Total__ 85 FILE CAB / 5.00 - - - ------- 86 FILE CAB � sold with item 85 120 4 MISC UNDER TABLE 2.54-1 3 7.50 0.1� 378 MICHAEL TUNSIL SHUKY LASER PRODUCTS CORP 1900 S TREASURE DE #2E 305-244-7920 MIAMI BCH, FL 33141 68 Under table mont. 10.00 70 Under table mont. 20.00 72 Under table mont. 70.00 74 NONT.UNDER TABLE 60.00 76 MOMIT. UNDER TABLE 60.00 127 UNDER TABLE MONIT. 20.00 132 TABLE TOP 8 MON. 25.00 . 134 TABLE TOP 8 MON. 45.00 135 UNDER TABLE 4 MON. 20.00 9 330.00 3.2% 380 ROSEMARY TERRONE 1203 COMMONWEALTH CIR APT 0203239-352-5299 NAPLES, FL 34116 91 FILE CAB 10.00 92 FILE CAB 10.00 94 FILE CAB 10.00 95 FILE CAB sold with item 04 98 FILE CAB 2N.00 99 FILE CAB sold with item 98 107 TABLE TOP TYPERWRlTEVS 5.00 128 TA8LE TOP PR.FAX,CuP/8HS 30.01.1 0.8% 381 JUNIOR MIDI 216 BENSON ST 230-520-1786 NAPLES FL 34113 � 212 NI�C 20.N0 ` 1 20.00 0.2* 383 MINDY ESQUIVEL 120 TEXAS RD LEHIGH ACRES, 114 TABLE 111 TABLE 119 METAL TABLE 239-03-0686 FL 33936 5.WN sold with item 114 5.00 3 a 0 10.00 0.1� AGEIDA ITEM JAN 13 2004 K FIRST COAST AUCTION & )v INC `~^ P O BOX 7878 au286\--ab150 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32238 904-772-0110 Fax: 904-777-8387 Web: www.firstcoastauction.pom Email: fcar@bellsouth.net All buyers pp~sE Name Items Total ___________________________________________________________ 384 NEIL RANDALL --------- ---- 2920 6TH ST NW 23g-304-5959 NAPLES FL 34120 129 UNbER TABLE MONITORS 25.00 25.00 N.2!4 103N7.50 AGENDA ITEM JAN 13 2004 M O O N M O .a U O C O U 7 Q O N O m CL AGENDI�ATEM I No,..� JAN 13 2004 pg. _��% 0 0;0. U) �,(0 0) J Q I�'.4 N O N co M CO �t O ° °' O co Z', Cn Ql O O O O• c9 Z o' O 6 co i t!1 O O C O O C) 0 O m L' O CL ,LO 0 O Pte') Z co i N o LO O I O O N O m O O > � O 0, � I O o Iti i � o o CO O p Lf) LL ti r l- C 'Tf 0 O N O m CL AGENDI�ATEM I No,..� JAN 13 2004 pg. _��% EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD RFP NO. 03 -3568, COUNTY -WIDE EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL (ESTIMATED VALUE $500,000.00) OBJECTIVE: Recommendation to award RFP No. 03 -3568 for County -wide Exotic Vegetation Removal (estimated value $500,000.00) to be used by various County Departments on an as- needed basis. CONSIDERATION: The Purchasing Department is responsible for the placement of various types of service agreements for County Departments to utilize on an as- needed basis. This contract will be used by various departments for removing exotic vegetation from County property. On October 1, 2003, formal request for proposals were posted in the lobby of the Purchasing Building and distributed to forty -four (44) firms that provide these services. On October 24, 2003, proposals from ten (10) firms were received. A Selection Committee meeting was held on November 25, 2003, and after review, scoring and discussion of the proposals, by consensus of the members, the following firms were considered best qualified to provide these services to the County and are in no particular order. • Earth Balance • DeAngelo Bros. -�° • Aquatic Weed Control • NaturChem • Floraquatics FISCAL IMPACT: The funds for this contract are located in the using departments cost centers. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact on the Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners award RFP No. 03.3568 for Exotic Vegetation Removal to arth Balance, DeAngelo Bros., Aquatic Weed Control, NaturChem, and Floraquatic a furLer authorize the chairman to sign the standard County Attorney approved � pct. r )"Jp "�F SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY Date: Scott D. Johnson, Purchasing Agent Purchasing Department Date: Stephen Y. Carn II, Director Purchasing Department a'" APPROVED BY: Date: Len Gol4ln Price, Administrator Administrative Services Division i2 -z� -�� AGENDA ITEM No. E- J AN 1 3 2004 P 9 . ___ L - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A TEMPORARY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SARASOTA COUNTY AND PAY FOR OFFICE SERVICES NOT TO EXCEED $3,000.00. THE OFFICE SPACE WILL BE OCCUPIED FOR A TNN'O MONTH PERIOD BY THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR OF THE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE DURING THE PROCEEDINGS OF STATE OF FLORIDA V. JOHN CALHOUN NORRIS AND ROBERT PAUL HARDY IN SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board ol' "'otinty Commissioners approve the execution of a temporary lease and the associated expenditures to provide for office space and associated expenditures for the Special Prosecutor of �i-te State Attorney's Office for the trial proceedings of the criminal case entitled State of Flog icl<< .. John Calhowt 1Vorris and State of Florida v. Robert Paul Hardv, being conducted in Sarasota, Florida. CONSIDERATION: The County " ! -_h its Department of Facilities Management is responsible for managing and providing ,pace for various Departments and Collier County Constitutional Officers. In addition, Facilities Nlanagement is sometimes obligated to provide accommodations for County operations outside the boundaries of Collier County. A Special Prosecutor for the State Attornc% lids been handling the prosecutorial affairs and duties relating to the John Norris and Robert Paul i lardy cases, and related cases for some time now in Collier County and the Collier County s. Due to a change of venue, the current trial /court proceedings are occurring in Sarasota Florida, and the State Attorney prosecutorial staff has a need to utilize Sarasota County goy ,:rnment office space. (Sarasota County has graciously located inexpensive office space niil,in ,rne of their older facilities that will meet the requirements of the State Attorney's otii� It is noted that it is the statutory responsibility of Collier County to provide for office space and the associated expenditures including.; ��ilities, lease payments and communication lines, including fax and network connections for the State Attorney. Collier County has provided the space and paid for these costs here; it i ; . _4essary to do the same for these proceedings being held in Sarasota County. According to the State Attorney's vi;. A-te space will only be needed for two months. Invoicing for the associated expenditures will be directed to the Facilities Management Department and will cover the follo�vliiz h,,;;iditures: AGE ► IT M No. a h1 1 3 2004 Executive Summary Special Prosecutor Lease Page 2 of 2 Title Monthly Cost T -1 Computer Line $350 2 Phone lines and 1 Fax �' 69 Fire Alarm Maintenance & Monitoring S117 Utilities (Water, Sewer, & Water) $400 A/C Maintenance $ 45 Janitorial Service $200 Total Monthly Expenditures $1,181 FISCAL IMPACT: Total costs for this temporary lease space, required utilities and telecommunication lines for a two-month period available will in Facilities Total Contractual Services. for this agreement are $2,362.00 a nd are Services. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact on the Growth Management Plan. �— RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve and authorize the execution of a temporary lease agreement and all necessary associated expenditures not to exceed $3,000 to provide office space and related services as described herein to the Special Prosecutor of the State Attorney's Office during the proceedings of State of Florida v. John Calhoun Norris and State of Florida v. Robert Paul prdy. SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY REVIEWED BY APPROVED BY Daniel R. Rodriguez Department of Facil �dclili.kles Manager es Management David Weigel, County AA County Attorney's Office Skip Pj)4CFM, , Director Department of Facilities Management YLLein—Gol n- Price, Admjnistrator Administrative Services Division Date: Date: Date: Date: Z AGE er BEM No. (� JAN 1 3 200 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING LIMITED SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY TO THE RISK MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR UNDER THE COUNTY'S PROPERTY, CASUALTY, AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE PROGRAMS. OBJECTIVE: To receive approval from the Board of Commissioners to delegate a limited level of settlement authority to the Risk Management Director in order to promote the efficient and effective management of the County's Property, Casualty, and Workers' Compensation insurance programs. CONSIDERATIONS: Since 1989, the Board of Commissioners has authorized a partially self - funded Property, Casualty, and Workers' Compensation insurance program as its primary risk financing arrangement pursuant to Florida Statutes chapters 768.28 and 440. During the course of the year, claims are presented for investigation, evaluation, settlement or denial. Many of these claims are simple or routine in nature and can be easily managed within the Risk Management Department. However, some claims that have high dollar values or are litigated require approval by the Board of Commissioners. Therefore, in order to clarify these levels of authority by type of claim and to set forth necessary supporting administrative procedures, a Resolution is presented which delegates settlement authority on non - litigated matters and matters below an established dollar threshold to the Risk Management Director. The Resolution grants settlement authority as follows: Claim Type Delegated Authority BCC Authority Bodily Injury Liability- Non - litigated claims less than $50,000 All litigated claims and non - litigated Premises, Auto, claims in excess of $50,000 Operations Property Damage Liability Non - litigated claims less than $75,000. All litigated claims and non - litigated Claims- Premises, Auto, (Note- A $75,000 limit is sought due to claims in excess of $75,000 Operations high valued vehicles and the potential for multi le vehicle accidents.) Errors, Omissions, Non - litigated claims less than $50,000 All litigated claims and non - litigated Professional Liability, claims in excess of $50,000 Employment Practices Liability Property Losses to Full authority Authority delegated due to the first County Owned Property art nature of these claims Workers' Compensation Full authority subject to the provisions Authority delegated due to the of F.S. 440 and subject to approval by administrative nature of these the Judge of Compensation ; claims- benefits are established by statute Employer's Liability Non- litigated claims less than $50,000 ! All litigated claims and claims in excess of $50,000 Subrogation- Bodily Injury Full authority to pursue non - litigated BCC must approve the settlement of and Property Damage subrogation recoveries. all litigated recoveries Subrogation- Workers' Full authority to pursue non- litigated BCC must approve the settlement of Compensation subrogation recoveries. all litigated recoveries ""C'*UA ITEM JAM 13 2004 'g• —/. Other pertinent provisions of the Resolution are as follows: • All claims are subject to documented Loss Verification Procedures including the completion of claim forms, documentation of evidence, valuation, a finding of liability where applicable, and review by the County Attorney's Office of claims in excess of $25,000. • The use of settlement documents must be approved as to legal sufficiency by the County Attorney's Office. • The Board must approve the retention of all legal counsel. • The Resolution grants authority to the Risk Management Director to pay for expenses necessary to investigate a claim, subject to ne Loss Verification and Expense Provisions of the Resolution. • A Closed File report will be presented to the Board on a quarterly basis as a Consent Agenda item to apprise the Board of settlements approved. The passage of this Resolution will reserve to the Board the final decision making authority required by statute as well as final authority to settle large dollar or litigated claims matters while promoting an effective and efficient claims management program. Examples of certain routine claims matters that Risk Management will manage include: • Minor trip and fall claims on County owned property involving medical only. • Physical damage claims to third party and county owned autos. • Property losses to County owned buildings and contents (fire, water, theft, etc). • The approval of various Petition for Benefit issues in Workers' Compensation cases. • The pursuit of subrogation monies due the County as a result of damage to County property by a third party (i.e. damage to guardrails, punctured water mains, etc,) This Resolution has been reviewed by the County Attorney Office as to legal sufficiency and the agency of the Clerk of Court. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated with this item. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Commissioners approve the attached Resolution. SUBMITTED BY: -- ff alker, CPCU, ARM, Director, Risk Management REVIEWED BY: !r 1��—,vl Michael Pettit, Chief Assistant County Attorney REVIEWED BY: 9�qt A-/- �- .. - Len Golde kPrice, Administrative Services Administrator Date: Date: 2 d'? Date: h-9,110 FA ITEM �_ 13 2004 RESOLUTION NO. 04- RESOLUTION GRANTING LIMITED AUTHORITY TO THE RISK MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR TO SETTLE CERTAIN DAMAGES CLAIMS AGAINST COLLIER COUNTY AND TO AUTHORIZE THE PAYMENT OF INVESTIGATION AND ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES AS PRESENTED TO THE COUNTY'S RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. WHEREAS, Collier County Government, through the Risk Management Department, operates a risk management program as permitted pursuant to Florida Statutes 768.28 for the purpose of financing, preventing and controlling various types of losses and the claims resulting from same; and WHEREAS, the management of these losses and resultant claims may involve the coordination of Workers' Compensation, Property, Liability, Automobile, Aviation and other lines of insurance and /or self - insurance programs; and WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners approves annually in public session the retention of various portions of these losses in the form of self - insured retentions, large deductibles or maintenance deductibles, by whatever name called, all of which involve the expenditure of public funds; and WHEREAS, the Board has approved the creation of various Self- insurance Funds as part of its budgeting process; and WHEREAS, the Risk Management Director is responsible for the day -to -day management of these Funds; and WHEREAS, it is the Board's intention to delegate to the Risk Management Director the authority to settle claims matters in order to promote the efficient use of resources; to promote the efficient administration of the program; and to allow for a timely response to claimants and /or their representatives; and WHEREAS, the Board finds that the limited delegation of settlement authority to the Risk Management Director serves a valid public purpose; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The Risk Management Director, or his designee. shall have the aujthority to investigate and settle claims made against the County and presented to the Risk Management Program as follows: ')efinitions: Action (Cause of Action) - An Action shall mean a written complaint filed in a court of law of Florida, any other state, or the United States. Adjuster - An individual representing the County, an insurance carrier and /or the insured and acting on their behalf to determine the applicability of coverage; the amount of a loss; and the liability of the County. Claim- A demand for benefits as a result of damages made by a Claimant and /or their representative and as may be provided by a policy of insurance or self - insurance program. A Claim may include a written notice of demand and intent to sue as defined by Florida Statutes 768.28 and as required precedent to the filing of any Action. Damages- The amount required to pay for a loss. Deposition- A sworn statement of a witness or other party in a judicial proceeding. AGE No. _ l� JA N 13 2004 p9• Excess (Insurance) Carrier (Policy)- An insurance carrier, either on an admitted or non - admitted basis, who underwrites coverage on the basis of an excess of a self- insured retention. Employer's Liability- Coverage against common law liability of an employer for accidents to employees, as distinguished from liability imposed by a Workers' Compensation law. First Party- The Collier County Board of Commissioners, its Divisions, Departments, employees, Boards, Authorities and all other parties who derive their authority to operate from the Board of Commissioners. First Party shall also include participating Constitutional Agencies and their operations. Loss Adjustment Expenses - Expenses incurred to investigate and settle losses. Mediation- An informal means of trying to promote settlement of a dispute. It involves a third -party mediator who meets the parties to the dispute and tries to get them to agree on a settlement. Plaintiff - The term "Plaintiff' as used herein may refer to a party who has asserted a Claim, aiso sometimes referred to as a "Claimant". Policy -.The v, :'en contract effecting insurance, or the certificate thereof, by whatever name called, and including all clause, riders, endorsements, and papers attached thereto and made a part thereof. Property Loss- Loss to the insured's property by reason of a covered peril. Purch sine Policy- The Collier County Purchasing Policy as approved by the Board of Commissioners. Risk Management (Program) — The management of the pure risks to which a company might be subject. It involves analyzing all exposures to the possibility of loss and determining how to handle these exposures through such practices as avoidinn me risk, retaining the risk, reducing the risk, or transferring the risk, usually by . _trance. Self- insured Retention- That portion of damages and loss adjustment expenses . related to an occurrence which are paid by the insured under an excess insurance peii cy. Settle /Settlement- Agreement to dispose of a Claim between an alleged injured parry ane - -: leged party at fault, typically to include the payment of considera i_:n.. and including the execution of any associated settlement agreemc� t;, Subrogation - - right to recover from a third party the amount paid under an insurance -, or mtained loss. Errors and Omissions- Coverage for liability resulting from errors or omissions in the pertcrm � c of professional duties and includes the acts of public officials. Workers' Compensation (Act)- Chapter 440 of the Florida Statutes which r'cT''"'' °`" - - `' ^rida Workers' Compensation Act and includes a system of wage re ela,;ement benefits for and medical treatment of compensable work - related r ;,rip, and occupational diseases, as well as the Administrative Procedur- 3 ;verning the administration of the Act. Claims Against Coll;er County 1) Bodily iniury Liability Claims- The Risk Management Director shall have the authority to �ctrip Claims that do not exceed $50,000 inclusive of Plaintiff's attorney's t y _s, aamages and expenses but exclusive of Loss Adjustment Expenses. (_! �ims wherein a Cause of Action has been filed shall require settlement �ccroval by the Board of Commissioners. 2) Property L2arnage Liability Claims- The Risk Management Director shall have the authont,, nettle Claims that do not exceed $75,000 inclusive of Plaintiff's attorney's ryes, damages and expenses but exclusive of Loss Adjustment Expenses. :;'aims wherein a Cause of Action has been filed shall require settlement aunroval by the Board of Commissioners. AGENP ITEM JAN 13 2004 2 Pg. 3) Errors and Omissions, Professional, Public Officials Claims- The Risk Management Director shall have the authority to settle Claims that do not exceed $50,000 inclusive of attorney's fees, damages and expenses but exclusive of Loss Adjustment Expenses. Claims wherein a Cause of Action has been filed shall require settlement approval by the Board of Commissioners. All settlements shall be subject to the Loss Verification and Expense Procedures contained herein. Property Losses Including Automobile Physical Damage (First Party) The Risk Management Director shall have the authority to authorize the payment of property Claims to County owned property pursuant to the terms of coverage and subject to the Loss Verification and Expense Provisions contained herein. Workers' Compensation Claims 1) Workers' Compensation (exclusive of Employer's Liability)- Due to the administrative nature of Workers' Compensation Claims, the Risk Management Director shall have the authority to settle Claims issues, including petition for benefits issues, medical, indemnity, and impairment benefit issues including medical and indemnity washouts pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 440, subject to the final approval of the Judge of Compensation Claims, if applicable. 2) Employer's Liability- The Risk Management Director shall have the authority to settle Claims that do not exceed $50,000 inclusive of plaintiff's attorney's fees, damages and expenses but exclusive of Loss Adjustment Expenses. Claims wherein a formal Cause of Action has been filed shall require settlement approval by the Board of Commissioners. Subrogation 1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage Claims- The Risk Management Director shall have the authority to pursue rights of subrogation on the County's behalf for damages incurred by the County and may enter into agreement to settle such Claims unless a Cause of Action is required to enforce the County's subrogation rights. If a Cause of Action is required, approval by the Board of Commissioners shall be required to bring such Action and the Board of Commissioners must approve settlement. 2) Workers' Compensation Claims- The Risk Management Director shall have the authority to pursue liens and /or rights of subrogation on the County's behalf for expenses incurred by the County which are caused by a third party. The Risk Management Director may approve an agreement to settle such liens or Claims unless a Cause of Action is required to enforce a matter. If a Cause of Action is required, approval by the Board of Commissioners shall be required to bring such Action and the Board of Commissioners must approve settlement. Loss Adiustment Expenses The Risk Management Director shall have the authority to authorize the payment of Loss Adjustment Expenses necessary to investigate and settle Claims brought against the County. Such expenses shall include but not be limited to the cost to retain experts, pay records expenses, pay filing fees and costs, pay the costs of AGENO No /� Gam- 1 JAN 13 2004 3 Pg•__,_5L — depositions, procure private investigation services, perform records reviews and searches. procure bill review services, procure appraisals, and procure other expenses necessary to investigate, authenticate, or evaluate a Claim made against the County. The Board of Commissioners waives the Collier County Purchasing Policy as to these expenditures but such shall be subject to the Loss Verification and Expense Provisions contained herein. Loss Adjustment Expenses shall not include the hiring or retaining of outside counsel to represent the Board or individual employees named in a Cause of Action. The hiring of outside counsel shall be subject to the approval of the Office of the County Attorney and the Board of Commissioners. Loss Verification and Expense Provisions The Risk Management Director shall document each Claim file with the following documents and records to support the settlement of Claims and /or the finding of negligence on the part of the Board of Commissioners to support the settlement of claims as permitted pursuant to this Resolution. 1) The completion of a Claim Form, 2) The completion of an investigation form including witness statements, collection of evidence, pictures, diagrams, etc. 3) The collection of necessary documentation to approximate the value of the loss. 4) A written recommendation by the Risk Management staff member or the contracted Adjuster performing the investigation as to the issue of liability, Claim valuation, economy and efficiency, and or other reasons for the recommendation to settle within recommended amounts. 5) A written recommendation by legal counsel, in the case of proposed liability claims settlements in excess of $25,000.00, outlining the parameters for settlement. The approval of Loss Adjustment Expenses shall be subject to the following provisions: 1) The Risk Management Director may approve the purchase of specialty services procured from vendors utilized by the Adjusting Company for their clients and when performed on the County's behalf to evaluate a Claim. The Adjusting Company shall disclose the estimated cost to provide the service prior to approval. The Risk Management Director may evaluate the cost/benefit of using same when evaluating the decision to settle a Claim. 2) If a service, document or thing is available from a single source, the payment of fees shall be permitted if such service, document or thing is necessary to authenticate the Claim. The Risk Management Director may evaluate the cost/benefit of this expenditure when evaluating the decision to settle a Claim. 3) The Risk Management Director may approve Loss Adjustment Expenses when the expertise or availability in a given area of expertise or service is determined by the Adjuster and the Risk Management Director to be narrow cr iimited or the avadubil;�yr of such service is limited due to geography and such expense is determined to be necessary to authenticate and evaluate the Claim. The Risk Management Director may evaluate the cost/benefit of this expenditure when evaluating the decision to settle a Claim. 4) If the County has exceeded its Self- insured Retention or has exceeded the notification requirements for an Excess Carrier as to the Self- insured Retention for a given Claim, the Risk Management Director, through the Adjusting Company shall coordinate the approval of expenditures with the AGE M% YT No.� JAN 13 2004 pg . ____lT_. Excess Carrier so as not to jeopardize the repayment of Reinsurance Funds. 5) The purchase of outside legal counsel services shall require the approval of the Office of the County Attorney and the Board of Commissioners. Settlement Documents The Risk Management Director, through the County's adjusting company and the Office of the County Attorney, shall prepare settlement and release documents for use in the settlement of non - litigated matters. Such documents shall be executed by the Risk Management Director upon settlement of the Claim in question, pursuant to the provisions of this Resolution. A copy of the standard form settlement document in blank is attached as Exhibit 1 and is approved as part of this Resolution. Delegation of Authority The Risk Management Director may, at his /her discretion, delegate this authority in part or in full on a temporary basis to a member of his /her staff or on a temporary, limited basis to the County's contracted adjusting company in the event of availability, schedule conflict, or other conflict. Such delegation may include attendance at mediation, arbitration, and /or trial. However, all settlement and release documents must be executed by the Risk Management Director. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote, favoring same. DATE: 2004 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: Dwight E. Brock, CLERK By: CHAIRMAN By. - -- DEPUTY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: By: L Michael W. Pettit Chief Assistant County Attorney A[iE ITEM No. 5 I JAN 13 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT AND RATIFY STAFF - APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS AND CHANGES TO WORK ORDERS TO BOARD- APPROVED CONTRACTS OBJECTIVE: To enable the Board to oversee the execution of administrative change orders and changes to work orders, and promote accountability in the use of staff authority. CONSIDERATIONS: On April 22, 2003, the Board approved a recommendation to implement a plan to enable changes to BCC - approved contracts of 10 percent or less to continue to be authorized by staff. The plan calls for staff to submit a monthly report listing these change orders from the previous reporting period. Enclosed is the monthly report of the Administrative Change Order and Administrative Changes to Work Orders Report. This report covers period beginning on or about December 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal imr t resulting from this action. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: 7" re is no Growth Management Impact associated with this action. RECOMMENDATION: That the Boar_] of County Commissioners accepts the enclosed Administrative Change Order and Admi :rative Changes to Work Orders Report and ratifies the listed change orders and changes to , ,o(k orders. PREPARED DATE: /Z'd 3 L 't - (-ts Agent REVIEWED BY: �' _ DATE: Stephen Y. Carvr ell, Pt.,rc^asing /General Services Director REVIEWED BY: �/� cyr -ciC r� - �' _ DATE: l /01 Len GoId6 Price, Admix) � rative Services Administrator AGENDA ITEM No. I, -dam S JAN 13 2004 ?g- l a W ce W 0 Nd ce M Oo 3N O L � E W Z a� V W LN r N H 0 Q N w O d cn IL a c U d CO aai o O1 _ m s U 0 � c (A C o 0 3a w-W c � 0 t E u 0- d rA T p0 C 1- O O a3a c E f0 a d D 6 � L td O Z 0 'o `o >a3 V y 1%0 d M N 4-� O M 0 0 N .OD 0 R on t: c � u J _ rr L .i L i ro j AGENOA.,�, UM 0 CE O :E r4 N 3J A N 14 9004 O L O O N 0 +U-+ ri L Q � C� 0 Q O Y j ul N C _O C O M fL Y c9 r, O O .a r' o E ro U fo d O V) ° 0 C Uf C � Ln c l UI co f O L M o p o V o E�' M c3 O a tB O m O N 00 L o C o a o L v Lri CF) cU cW � N O C C {f} �fl N N° M O C o v� � o N c �� LA r 3 v V S.c o 0) U.) M M t0 � O C •� 0 O O L � O a� U') L .emu m N fl �- O 4. — +� ° E o {� vi fv ? ° � O L C > u w ° r0 n Ln � fo 0 N t0 fn O 0 L 0 C O (n N 0 O N O M r3 Lr 00 O —f V) (3) L M � O O N A�4 Q. fy N O O 3 E � 7 C v n ..61 f0 O L L M N L V) n w o i+ O Uf v d L O ° :3 Ci O 1� L �.c O n -c f0 3 - U v (3) cr rn v V) o f � c {+'a U- ro O M N_ N 41 v f9 � v L ~ F- 01 01 41� m u rra C L- > O u1 ° U a a) a " °v — M U N O LNn �O O QJ C E O f6 7 CO O O N �O C M fa z _J fT .- rD fB '' 4 fv LLn to a L .+.r '� C O C fO (n � U ..' Q1 3 'L U1 CL C� L N ate+ ai fro m i U� F_� >1 iL+ O N UMZO to _ u� O u1 vLn O� r N N un f0 CO 0 ( M n — � 4J = o � Vl acna0wa m O^ QdOQuP _ Ln M Z -4N O rro- N =Z M n m orr,o�� o ( U UE s c M O o O aNi I M U L 0 3, . , � O v- 0c O O N N j N 4-� O M 0 0 N .OD 0 R on t: c � u J _ rr L .i L i ro j AGENOA.,�, UM 0 CE O :E r4 N 3J A N 14 9004 O CL W W D O Y � M Oo 3 N O z' a (uj V Z 2� W H a H H D a V w O N Q1 o, CL c m gal O 4) O1 c m t V 0 V C (OA O O �3a v i' �C C � 0 r E V Q L L QO c O a3a C 47 E m CL w In 6 * L. L R 471 O V 0 y O > CL ay �o 47 0 ° _0 CD L Q1 N u f0 (0 f0 O a) C f0 f1 L O O } c ra u 3 � L O [f O o a) o d O O u 0 a) O lD L O r' O Z. Ln E M i i0 N •- u N u 0 i pr v `n Q CD _c M f6 O 0 u N N O � {-} L -0 u E � a) ° G Q) c O C) - o c Ln Ln 0 3 M N V _u N m L � a O O u J OL C W OL 01 CL L a rB O � L 10 3 y ° T) Q, o M. V) O u O M ��F-- O L t0 M fY fB°6UC� vj =Noz= fv fu C E re E L M U cn 0 N 0 j u N 47 u , LX (L0 L v� o' -° v O O N M O c r-, 0 00 IT O G 0 G M 1D �D • • N Ln U `D O 4bpr a (D O M E C� ct� C a) i LJ Q) c a a i C O + -� CO (o O M v LO ° CTS N Q <CDMMQ Q) v) 6 cS cd in Ln O N 0 M O N r� —i Ln u a) O fZ (3) t _O a� O 3 C Q) L V) T) s O� It a) L 0 E O w N a� a, a� % C f0 f0 L Q �s N O N .J N y .D J C1.r 0 t: "A O C Q. x U L > T No. 1 �y C O � JAN 1) bO4 P9•-1_ CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Church Parking Lot PROJECT #: 52003 BID /RFP #: 02- 3349MOD #: 1 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $(3,305.00 PO #: 4500014986 Work Order #:PBS -02 -05 CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 85,900.00 CURRENT $82,595.00 (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $85,900.00 (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval9 /9 /03Agenda Item # 16 F 1 Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount -3.85% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: 11/01/03 CURRENT11 101/03 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Change in Scope of services A credit was issued as the church requested thatthe landscaping along Airport Road be left out. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Owner requested PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Jack Crognale, Bob Pierce, Skip Camp IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) y_ Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement - y_ Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope y_ Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement y_ The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change y_ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT MAN ER ECOMMENDATION: APPROVE: DISAPPRO COMM REVISED 9/9/03 Date: Date: AGEZ'VEM JAN 1 3 2004 Pg. _ z M CHANGE ORDER JUSTIFICATION CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 PROJECT #: 111 - 163652 - 620314 A Gail Boorman WO TLM- GB -03 -01 CONTRACT NO. 00 -3131 MODIFICATION #1: - Add a new task to the Contract: Soil Laboratory Testing taking monies from reimbursable and moving it to this new task. CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL: $23,359.00 CURRENT: $23,359.00 CURRENT COMPLETION DATES: ORIGINAL: $23,359.00 CURRENT: $23,359.00 DATE OF LAST BCC APPROVAL:APRIL 22. 2003 AGENDA ITEM #: 10C SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES. 1. ADD ANEW TASK TO THE CONTRACT FOR SOIL LABORATORY TESTING IN THE AMOUNT OF $609.40. 2. TAKE MONIES FROM REIMBURSABLE IN THE AMOUNT OF $609 40 REDUCING REIMBURSABLES FROM THE ORIGINAL AMOUNT OF $2,500.00 TO $1,890.60.00 JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGES., 1. In the Agreement for Fixed Term Professional Landscape Architectural Services Dated April 24, 2001 (Contract #00- 3131), soil laboratory testing is not included in reimbursable expenses therefore a line item is needed. 2. Airport - Pulling road construction was completed over 2 years ago. In the Collier County Landscape Beautification Master Plan, approved April 22, 2003, a base level of landscaping addresses 8" median planting soil to be installed during construction. This policy was not in place when the road was constructed, therefore the soil needed to be tested for plant surviva' prior to planting. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: PAMELA LULICH, GLORIA HERRARA, IMPLEMENTATION STEPS: Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change Proposed prices, fees, and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED: DATE: f2 DISSAPPROVE: DATE: COMMENTS: AGENDA ITEM No.� JAN 1 3 2004 3. CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Lake Keliv Ditch Improvements PROJECT #: 51801 BID /RFP #: 02 -3345 MOD #: 1 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE 90 PO #: 4500002581 Work Order #: WD -015 CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 264,012.55 CURRENT $ 263,922.55 (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $ 264,012.55 (LAST TOTAL ANIT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval November 5, 2002 Agenda Item # 16 -B -6 Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount — 0.034% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10 BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): N/A ORIGINAL: N/A CURRENT: N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Install an earth -in weir in the Lake Kelly ditch and install chain link fence to keep out the public during construction JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Not included in the original design and needed to prevent salt- water intrusion into the fresh water systeM. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Tom Hicks (DN Higgins representative) Robert Wiley P.E., Mike Etelamaki P.E. IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each he ±ore proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) N Proposed change is consistent with the sccce of the existing agreement Y Proposed change is in fact an addition or c: tion to the existing scope Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement Y The appropriate parties have been consult--,j regarding the change Y Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth.in the change are reasonable PROJECT APPROVE - i D PION: Date: jez—( 9-03 DISAPPROV Date: CONLMENTS: Work directives were used fir the additional work during the construction project to prevent delays and potential claims from the c�:;uractor. Revised 8/22/03 AGENDA +I TE No. JAN 1 3 2004 pg. CON -RACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: NCRWTP Wellfield Reliability PROJECT #: 71006 BID /RFP #: 00 -3119 MOD #: 1 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $ -0- PO #: Not issued yet (Req 10026692) Work Order #: HS- FT -04 -01 CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 622,350 _ CURRENT $ 622,350 (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $ 622 350 (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval 12/16/03 Agenda Item # 16 C 14 Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount 0 % Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: CURRENT: SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Clarify scope of work with no change in contract cost or time. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Clarify scope of work with no change in contract cost or time PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Roy Anderson Pete Schalt, Lyn Wood IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or NIA) _x_ Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement _x Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope _x_ Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement _x The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change _x_ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are ; easonable PROJECT MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE: Karl W Boyer DISAPPROVE: Date: Date: 12/19/03 T COMMENTS: Scope reference in the Work Order approved by the Board makes reference to a proposal rintarl Mnvamhar 91 903_ The Dr000sal attached to the Xsum approved by the Board was dated November 20 2003 The correct proposal dated November 21, 2003 is attached. Revised 8/22/03 AGE I No. JAN 13 2004 Pg. R CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: 2003 Australian Pine Tree Removal Project PROJECT #: 51501 BID /RFP #: 00 -3125 MOD #: 1 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $800 PO #: 4500007636 Work Order #: DBA- FT -03 -01 CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 165,500 CURRENT $ 166,300 (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $ 165,500 (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval , 3/11/03 Agenda Item #16138 Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount 0.48 % Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: 7/20/03 CURRENT: 12/12/03 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): An additional $800 is requested in order to cover the cost of removing all the Australian Pine Trees from Work Site # 49 the final work site location of the Drolect. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): The change was necessary in order to remove all the trees at a particular location (work site 49) so as not to have to come back later and disturb the same area again. Work sites 42 through 49 were added as part of the contingency portion of the work order /protect. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: The contractor and the project manager IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) Y Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement Y Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement Y The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change Y Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT M AGE ,R C��NDATION: APPROVE: Date: DISAPPROVE: Date. COMMENTS: Revised 8/22/03 AGEN A ITEM-- JAN 13 2004 Pg. • • • w W � M Oo W O � N L Z V W U M 0 Q Z L Q a C U � d m CL (D ce v OI C m t U 0 r v 10 r C O U 3a d Z Ll 4) G1 C tC L U N IS � U p ama v C1 C t V � r C O r. f0 a d D 44) E r0 :ft Z r U 0 w L 'O d r C p C > 0.0 0 0 N ry) c r� n 0 tD O O O d r-i r-1 �O N rn N O O z Ln O M O� N O n M i id c a) C v O_ > O L a. o E d c c rL0 O F- v a) N a) Lr U C m O — a) n U.) j O r>o o V) v L o U aj.LU M d OL O M Qa.UO M O N N 4 U (I) 0 L Q a) L L au w M (3) u (1) L a) 3 L _u L 3 vi C Q) E E O u 3 T, v H O 0 LL a) CL N a) c (O L u 0 Ln O N a) r a� z c R Z U w 0 ru O O N rri a v c r0 r-, m Qi O O r-i Ln V T-i co M co 0 z O O N Go Ln tD N �r m c N 70 CD 3: O T-3 0 0 Ln rY -Y. C co LL w v o LU 0 C� L 0 m v C U L w y v cn M c o c w,D O Q, O U 0 N UT .( �2 N O O orlarn r) M O N 4 W 0 C O Z a� 41 c v C t0 J Q) CL E O a 0 V) a� c O, o U a) v= C 73 a O w E O L E =; L O a1 rn CL U O LL m Ln c O c c M tp i V) x c w O � v v0 a C � o, n. N y � c to f0 M o c 'a v U_ C L yL., O y, U U -0 O � O O c V Y c o ro cn Li u_ w L k O o c ai Q � Q c c 0 tC CO t c v� `' o o 3 V 7l l O L +r_a j v of ,m V' O 0 N C rp ^ 0 M M N Ln N N N r-i O �o Ln iA- N N 6 z O O n N t\ Or O Ln Ln o N C7 6f- E m v 'v r0 LL � 'co Q1 ^ M Ln �.+ Y N `L° 0 E CO Ya Eon M O co N M ai L c � a) i > u O ro C c o 3 U 0 m L L � �+ 'n w r6 O }, 't c O O a) m V N t m Q L C O a) a� O a) O CL O L O O Ln L t� rn mL c o O u u U x C a) d L Q) r: IM Ln c Ln V N _ N co L O n v � v � w a) N O r6 CL O v L '.q w 4- N O c v i Q) E °1 V O 7 � N ro m C C r4 � U C � a+ O U L Z3 n'o aU rU �, m C C 4) r0 � L � v � Ln .n L O H � Y O a w � C d a) a) Ln 4. 0 a� :1 a, M O 0 N .n E a� 0 Uj 00 U �� p.� Mr L r CL 0 OOC O rl d E m1 Ip w a 0 0 N ry) c r� n 0 tD O O O d r-i r-1 �O N rn N O O z Ln O M O� N O n M i id c a) C v O_ > O L a. o E d c c rL0 O F- v a) N a) Lr U C m O — a) n U.) j O r>o o V) v L o U aj.LU M d OL O M Qa.UO M O N N 4 U (I) 0 L Q a) L L au w M (3) u (1) L a) 3 L _u L 3 vi C Q) E E O u 3 T, v H O 0 LL a) CL N a) c (O L u 0 Ln O N a) r a� z c R Z U w 0 ru O O N rri a v c r0 r-, m Qi O O r-i Ln V T-i co M co 0 z O O N Go Ln tD N �r m c N 70 CD 3: O T-3 0 0 Ln rY -Y. C co LL w v o LU 0 C� L 0 m v C U L w y v cn M c o c w,D O Q, O U 0 N UT .( �2 N O O orlarn r) M O N 4 W 0 C O Z a� 41 c v C t0 J Q) CL E O a 0 V) a� c O, o U a) v= C 73 a O w E O L E =; L O a1 rn CL U O LL m Ln c O c c M tp i V) x c w O � v v0 a C � o, n. N y � c to f0 M o c 'a v U_ C L yL., O y, U U -0 O � O O c V Y c o ro cn Li u_ w L k O o c ai Q � Q c c 0 tC CO t c v� `' o o 3 V 7l l O L +r_a j v of ,m V' O 0 N C rp ^ 0 M M N Ln N N N r-i O �o Ln iA- N N 6 z O O n N t\ Or O Ln Ln o N C7 6f- E m v 'v r0 LL � 'co Q1 ^ M Ln �.+ Y N `L° 0 E CO Ya Eon M O co N M ai L c � a) i > u O ro C c o 3 U 0 m L L � �+ 'n w r6 O }, 't c O O a) m V N t m Q L C O a) a� O a) O CL O L O O Ln L t� rn mL c o O u u U x C a) d L Q) r: IM Ln c Ln V N _ N co L O n v � v � w a) N O r6 CL O v L '.q w 4- N O c v i Q) E °1 V O 7 � N ro m C C r4 � U C � a+ O U L Z3 n'o aU rU �, m C C 4) r0 � L � v � Ln .n L O H � Y O a w � C d a) a) Ln 4. 0 a� :1 a, M O 0 N .n E a� 0 Uj 00 U �� p.� Mr L a W W � M Oo W C 0 N L Q � U q�j W U H 0 a r H H D Q cn C_ O O u t v ri m d ae C � I � G1 C m 'C N U *' 0 V O ` +' „ c o co v U E rn 3 Q M z N 4: 0 � N c m O 'c z U i c O ' U L yv a ama Of y C E mQ t U iR c t m CL 0) 0 d z # o i C� ^C >a`c°� O 0 0 O O 0 It N 0 0 O O t\ t\ M N p p C7 W a N c O O c u o O c c m a X U n W a uLL00 O .^ M C O` U N Wazo E C O v aJ N O u O O 0 U L y In a u fu L- L- 3 c c V 0 u Va Ln rn �= C m GJ E > a u O O U) C). 01 C' N 0 0 '3 - U p ` a c o a L - +- 0) Q) tea' (o of U a N c 6 O aui > O a E a v ° a p Caa CU 3 L N C') U o c a O c '> o W CU �L�> m 4� a o -0on rn 3 m In v— w '> C C E o o 0 L- 0 . U C '� m O p rro 0 a V) O m a In E m u c E v E c m a O a C O u > m a �- 0 > O v � 0 L W C 3 m C 0 O U a)am>. m 0 0 v uw a L. O E „CO o"n a7E0a m E m� CME Q) C uo V '> L O 3 a 3 v o L > o 4 . C w o IT O 0 N M 7 C m n rn M O O V' O 0 z O 0 0 0 01 M O O tD O m V O p � W m a 3 m a v a O �Q �+ zm� C y + LL Q1 cc U z0 a`vvio M O 0) N LA IV v M -C O O N i td Ln L L a N a aE-oE .n ac E u m o aaNw. a c E Ln 01 +' n 0 C Y �t L a O �o - = v N O Ln C Ln EE CL E �rn0O u u o E v, m O O m �O 4 avav aE' E }' c w O v a u s '2 pr Cva,n .cn 0 3 m L- u 13 O qJ � E N >^ 0 V) 3 c >, V) v -, > w c O 00 0 4 ; c Q) m Q) X C a m `O > C �O E i ^ 0 O m ON L O v n �' 4A N c a x v17E� a L L L O O uz oM (U 4.1 ' 3 0 c - N O O L c N a O m ` N a 0Ea .6 E a2E.oa D-Z0aa m a s p ta.+-+ u � 4, 0 3 v - C . O t m u c C ~ ` 0, a�� o M .0 m0c O v N o O o o a 3 O c c ±_+ O -6 EE y L" fa V > u In c W a C a > o 'o 'm ��0 0 .0 0. u u O O N rYi ro 3 C m n N N rn n Go Lr LO N 0 Z 0 ui �t rn O CID Ln LO t\ l0 ri c 0 z m t a c a c E f- O CL L. E o 'v -4 O m rn rY Oro iM U w Lr7 V a c M fn co M O O N r H O N In Z = L- 3 E o o c_ a � of � C O m U c a O E v avi c C m a � sc c c o m N Ln i O O c Z o a � � Z O N cm O c � @ C C m u c '2 o In - E E� a � > In 0 Z v, -0 3 Q) '�° t O Q CL a 0 L a a Q) 3 > � O L V Ln O c -0 O ` aa) o c cn a o„ a -W `° aN c w a C V) O w. o A c c .+.+ O O1J L a O v C w m C N M U t a (U w E i6 O C __ 3 C D4AGE Qp j cn 0 c IS Q N C ro a M 0 O N E aJ O ii C2 c� 1 1 0 a � CD M eg In 0) N N tm E m 2 a Nt* E C O v aJ N O u O O 0 U L y In a u fu L- L- 3 c c V 0 u Va Ln rn �= C m GJ E > a u O O U) C). 01 C' N 0 0 '3 - U p ` a c o a L - +- 0) Q) tea' (o of U a N c 6 O aui > O a E a v ° a p Caa CU 3 L N C') U o c a O c '> o W CU �L�> m 4� a o -0on rn 3 m In v— w '> C C E o o 0 L- 0 . U C '� m O p rro 0 a V) O m a In E m u c E v E c m a O a C O u > m a �- 0 > O v � 0 L W C 3 m C 0 O U a)am>. m 0 0 v uw a L. O E „CO o"n a7E0a m E m� CME Q) C uo V '> L O 3 a 3 v o L > o 4 . C w o IT O 0 N M 7 C m n rn M O O V' O 0 z O 0 0 0 01 M O O tD O m V O p � W m a 3 m a v a O �Q �+ zm� C y + LL Q1 cc U z0 a`vvio M O 0) N LA IV v M -C O O N i td Ln L L a N a aE-oE .n ac E u m o aaNw. a c E Ln 01 +' n 0 C Y �t L a O �o - = v N O Ln C Ln EE CL E �rn0O u u o E v, m O O m �O 4 avav aE' E }' c w O v a u s '2 pr Cva,n .cn 0 3 m L- u 13 O qJ � E N >^ 0 V) 3 c >, V) v -, > w c O 00 0 4 ; c Q) m Q) X C a m `O > C �O E i ^ 0 O m ON L O v n �' 4A N c a x v17E� a L L L O O uz oM (U 4.1 ' 3 0 c - N O O L c N a O m ` N a 0Ea .6 E a2E.oa D-Z0aa m a s p ta.+-+ u � 4, 0 3 v - C . O t m u c C ~ ` 0, a�� o M .0 m0c O v N o O o o a 3 O c c ±_+ O -6 EE y L" fa V > u In c W a C a > o 'o 'm ��0 0 .0 0. u u O O N rYi ro 3 C m n N N rn n Go Lr LO N 0 Z 0 ui �t rn O CID Ln LO t\ l0 ri c 0 z m t a c a c E f- O CL L. E o 'v -4 O m rn rY Oro iM U w Lr7 V a c M fn co M O O N r H O N In Z = L- 3 E o o c_ a � of � C O m U c a O E v avi c C m a � sc c c o m N Ln i O O c Z o a � � Z O N cm O c � @ C C m u c '2 o In - E E� a � > In 0 Z v, -0 3 Q) '�° t O Q CL a 0 L a a Q) 3 > � O L V Ln O c -0 O ` aa) o c cn a o„ a -W `° aN c w a C V) O w. o A c c .+.+ O O1J L a O v C w m C N M U t a (U w E i6 O C __ 3 C D4AGE Qp j cn 0 c IS Q N C ro a M 0 O N E aJ O ii C2 c� 1 1 0 ce O CL W ce W ce M Oo W C N u Z� Q � U W a� Vl N Z H Q Q 11 w O M C7 p1 m a I L L Q) o o of ° � �v o o 0 0 0 0 o o M Ln N N u u, a).L E E E y y U o y, u u U1 M M i i O O rp t0 i i G • L �CO d a a) I p p C • N U L � p C w 0) '� L C C p � 0 r9 � o V V Q1 o L L U U c N N C C C O o o N '� 'O p E E .21 01 r r0 L° N N N N� o o L L N G i o 0 00 0-0 G X i t t9N0 C =L X C ° C C tfT O O N O O O_ 0,-, O 1 0 0') O O L O O a+ � �, C O O - p w ° M d C ca C O I M M C C E i N N v vi � r ra O O O M M p p L m Q Q O O — N m — U a) M M N m 3a r rau � � 0 0QJ G) (u !E c I � � Q L r ro Z F F- Q' E M O> v O O u u O c J J V' O� L L1'1 p p a) M M O OU O O Lr) S � L O > L O O S z L_0 u � z L J..� z z L L o p p_z;° c rd Q u.O oo � � a c �n a ac CD O au) c 7 p p r0 a) . ._ C O O v .i - O a •� to C C � O O O O ° c a* i 'IT p ° 3 Q f fPr m m V v v1 i i to O 01 L L O a) y N ,, 0 ro N v o y y — — L O O �E a Q) Ln U Up L L° c0 E i U) .O a > > C n n E E O E i v U y i i7 ' ° ) ) p a) C O O a) a a` ti N N ( (0 C O O 3 3 O O i Q O O O O n y Q Q O 0) Q Q O z z U 1R �I . .1 �+ 0 4 4.1 C 1 1-4 O O L 7 N 3 R I �+ 1 m O L '� t O Q r ry ` � a) l lb } � O O. i �_ tp C I O O O r N M A I I O E E>, a� D Ur C C Z C ` `) C� N N C r rn C_ - ., c c a)+�w � � f0 C C1 >- UO L p p a) c w v vim LU Ln y n 7 C U cUp L p C L 0 L y n Ln r ra L L 4 p p J"i L L V V u p r L L L d V V- L J O L V � O C E E u L L 4 4+ O U U 3 3 N+ f0 �$ c c M a L L O i o C C O C C oZs C C C fa cn f L. U O r� W a aJ 0- O O tD z tf) L L y r0 Q Q r- CO O O m O d C C C m m a) � �' N �' c vi E E v O t c Q O p pV .� M ~ ~ p i N 0 cn r L aj V V) M Q t\if v >aU W WaZO a aO.0 � �dD0 ~ ~ > -0 � �'0 C C in E L f f a E 'p co ai 3 ro O O + y R C M f0 A U c u M c a) Q U U f U C u p p O O T A9 GE U .ao ) N 3 30-=Ul N No. o. G a a) v a u uu Qc I N • •- 1 ro £ � �� L LPL°' v w O cn :7 G M O O N .D y O ml buA C v o c3 U AGENOA NA. M CL c t � 30104 _ ¢o � o o v O ru O c U L 47 =3 O N N O m a m .M-1 E 0 m L r0 4 O C rD O fu O C C C7 y ^j N a�+ 7 tm S U ^ L N n d N o j C o L ri C v C 0 Ul) rn :J V1 v C M (A ++ 3 ^ C try U ^ d p OC o 1 O OL O v L C Qr1 r6 O '� �f. C N m E CA LU ri d lD L V w f0 O z E ° L `� o z F- �C M O a°) 1 o O Co o o °1 O c o Lri a W N y R > u U r O O � O L Z _Q M m I ^' G7 U Q .il >�° L Co M v� E a N Y V H N V Q Gf ++ n m = Q N '1 00 O M O U V) U tPr M _. ; Fri N r) J r u W O a N aQ) Z - Q C E 4.1 c N E � U a7 O J N E V) ~_ a Oa N _r LL iU li G1 > E m 41 C V C V f0 L �N Op _ @01 v1 N p� C C� O �D O U o c �o a� -o vN _ E fn a� >av YLnn2 o i , �o �0p' Y to z rn U xUO F- v CI c O L. L Q V++ O _ '71 j M p U M O U 4J w4-1 O R a' al p N 0 i n rq > O Oi > L i qj N O ol ol v w O cn :7 G M O O N .D y O ml buA C c3 U AGENOA NA. M CL c t .IAN 1 30104 ¢o s_ ;,9' I CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Collier / Davis Intersection Improvements PROJECT #: 60170 BID /RFP #: 03 -3501 MOD #: one (1) AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $ 4.34 PO #:4500018370 Work Order #: N/A CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 702,930.45 CURRENT $702,926.11 (INCLUDING 02,9 6T IS CHANGE ORDER) (STARTING POINT) Last BCC Approved Amount $ 702 930.45 (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval September 9 2003 Agenda Item # (16) (B) (9)_ Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount -•1 % Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: March 31, 2004_ CURRENT: March 31,2004 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Roadway Drainaqe Signage and Marking items JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANG S): To update quantities per FDOT review comments received after the project bid. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Julio Ordonez P.E. Lynn Thorpe, P E FDOT Trey Barclay Proiect Engineer K.C.C.S. and APAC IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) Y Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement Y Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement Y The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change Y Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: �� Date: APPROVE: DISAPPR A: Date: f COMMENTS: REVISED 9/9/03 F GENDA I i N 1 3 2004 ?9. C?� CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Goodlette -Frank Road PROJECT #: 60134 BID /RFP #: 96 -2599 MOD #: S/A 8 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $_1 6,000 PO #:4500004140 Work Order #: CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 665,182 CURRENT $ 1,381,451 Last BCC Approved Amount $ 1 2(STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER) (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval 07 -31 -01 Agenda Item # 16B12 Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount 9.19 % Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: 04 -15 -99 CURRENT: 30 Days after NTP SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Conduct traffic analysis of Pompeii Lane intersection and desinn rnaAwnu h.,. .e��:............._ �- JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Change is needed to prevent a mis- alignment of current traffic lanes with the widening protect to the south PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Department Director, desian and construction protect managers desinn consultant and traffic consultant IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) Y Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement Y Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement Y The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change Y Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT MANAGER RECOMMENDATIONW,&,2_ APPROVE: Allen R. Ruth, P.E. Senior Project Manager Date: 12 -04 -03 DISAPPROVE: Date: COMMENTS: REVISED 9/9/03 aAGE r_I M j Rio. a ! 4 1 3 2004 ?9. CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Immokalee Jail Project PROJECT #: 53196 BID /RFP #: 98 -2829 MOD #: 22 PO #: 202300 Work Order #: AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $8,285.80 CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL ($ 7A,,4T27, 64.00 CURRENTINC,69 , 2HIS CHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $7,427,664.00 (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval: September 25 2001 Agenda Item #16 K(3) Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount — 23.37% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 royal is required; under 10% reported Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC app to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: 1/10/03 CURRENT: 1/10103 Substantial Complete SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Adjust Project Fee for all Charges Exceeding $50,000.00 per article 10.4 of the Contract. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Changes according to Contract. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Jack Crognale Skip Camp & Steve Carnell IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify e scope of the with change Y, N or NIA) Y Proposed change Is consistent with the Y Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement Y The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change Y_ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT MANA R ECOMMENDATION: Date: APPROVE: Date: DISAPPROVE: COMMENT` REVISED 9/9/03 AGENDA I, No. //�.- d-- JAN 13 200 Pg •.mss -- I -I-- CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: NCWRF Expansion to 24.1 MGD - Liquid Stream PROJECT #: 73950 BID /RFP #: 02 -3418 MOD #: 02 -01 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $38,158.00 PO #: 4500004112 Work Order #: N/A CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $24,861,000.00 CURRENT $24,939,900.00 (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $24,861,000.00 (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval: 12 /17/02 Agenda Item #:10C Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount: 0.32% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): —GRIT-CHAMBER #4-MILESTONE; ORIGINAL: -311 -6/04 --CURRENT:-3/23104— PROJECT SUBSTANTIAL: ORIGINAL: 3/16/05 CURRENT: 3/16/05 PROJECT FINAL: ORIGINAL: 6/14/05 CURRENT: 6/14/05 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Revisions were made to the site drawings of the as -bid Contract Documents to comply with comments made by County Development Services for County approval of the Site Development Plan for this project. Revisions included extension of 6 -inch potable water piping, relocation of a fire hydrant, additional limerock road, and additional clearing and grubbing of existing non - native vegetation. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Comments from County Development Services were received after the bid period for this project and could, therefore, not be incorporated into the bidding documents. Incorporation of comments from Development Services was required so that the Contractor could obtain building permits. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Project Delivery Team (i.e. - NCWRF Plant Staff, County Project Manager, Engineer, Contractor) IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or NIA) �roposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement ./.Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope gropohange is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement sed he appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable CONSULTING EN SINE R RE MENDATION: RECOMMEND: ��W Date: 11 • (64"' 03 DO NOT RECOM END. Date. PROJECT MANAGER C�QM ENDATION: RECOMMEND: Date: DO NOT RECOMMEND: Date: COMMENTS: AGEN ITEM No. _ Revised 8/22/03 _IAN 13 2004 Pg' -16 ,qh CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: NCWRF Expansion to 24.1 MGD — Liquid Stream PROJECT #: 73950 BID /RFP #: 02 -3418 MOD #: 02 -02 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $8,131.00 PO #: 4500004112 Work Order #: N/A CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $24,861,000.00 CURRENT $24,948,031.00 (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $24,861,000.00 (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval: 12/17/02 Agenda Item #:10C Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount 0.35% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): GRIT CHAMBER #4 MILESTONE: ORIGINAL:_ 3/16/04 CURRENT: 3/23/04 PROJECT SUBSTANTIAL: - ORIGINAL: 3/16/05 CURRENT: 3/16/05 PROJECT FINAL: ORIGINAL: 6/14/05 CURRENT: 6114/05 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Materials and labor to add an additional fitting on the proposed 8- inch diameter waste - activated sludge (WAS) piping near its connection to existing WAS piping near the northeast corner of existing Sludge Pump Station No. 4 (reference Contract Drawing No. 1M15). JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): The fitting was required to accommodate a change in vertical elevation between the proposed and existing WAS piping and was inadvertently omitted from the as -bid Contract Drawings. Had this item been discovered during the design period, it would have been incorporated into bidding documents and the additional costs included in this change item would have been included in a higher lump -sum bid price for the overall project. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Project Delivery Team (i.e. - NCWRF Plant Staff, County Project Manager, Engineer, Contractor) IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) roposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope ,hange is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement he appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable AGE ,Item No. tr (Q4 1� -I a N 13 200, P9•� Collier County Public Utilities North Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion to 24.9 MGD — Liquid Stream Change Order No. 2, Mod. No. 02 -2 CONSULTING E�N NEE RE I' ENDATION: RECOMMEND: Date: �} •��• DO NOT RECOMM ND: _ Date: PROJECT MANAGEPyf2E jr �0 MENDATION: �F�o3 RECOMMEND: Date: DO NOT RECOMMEND: Date: COMMENTS: Revised 8/22/03 AGE " ?rA IT M No' A A N 13 2004 Pg• l%I G CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: NCWRF Expansion to 24.1 MGD — Liquid Stream PROJECT #: 73950 BID /RFP #: 02 -3418 MOD #: 02 -03 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $2,177.00 PO #: 4500004112 Work Order #: NIA CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $24,861,000.00 CURRENT $24,950,208 .00CHANGE ORDER) (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING Last BCC Approved Amount $24LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval: 12117/02 Agenda Item #:10C Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount: 0.36% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT_ COMPLETION DATE (S)_ GRIT CHAMBER #4 MILESTONE: ORIGINAL: 3116/04 CURRENT: 3/23!04 PROJECT SUBSTANTIAL: ORIGINAL: 3116/05 CURRENT: 3116/05 PROJECT FINAL: ORIGINAL: 6114/05 CURRENT: 6114/05 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Materials and labor to install a ductile -iron restrained -joint plug at the open end of a 30 -inch diameter return - activated sludge (RAS) pipeline. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): The Contract Drawings show a 30 -inch tee, a 30" x 24" reducer and a 24 -inch plug valve at the point of connection of the proposed RAS piping on this project to future RAS piping to be installed for future Aeration Basin No. 7 under a future project. Although the 24 -inch valve will be closed to isolate this future connection from the active portion of the pipeline, a fixed plug was added downstream of the valve to isolate the future connection in the event there is minor leakage past the valve seat. As such, this is a project betterment. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Project Delivery Team (i.e. — NCWRF Plant Staff, County Project Manager, Engineer, Contractor) IN LEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) c Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement he appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable AGE�a A I "�< No. Lp14N'l 3 200 g. Collier County Public Utilities North Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion to 24.1 MGD – Liquid Stream Change Order No. 2, Mod. No. 02 -3 CONSULTING EN NEE f , RE MENDATION: RECOMMEND: Date DO NOT RECOM END: Date: PROJECT MANAGER ff5WQ/IENDATION: RECOMMEND: DO NOT RECOMMEND: COMMENTS: Date: )1 -1a -01 Date: �0-03 CDC- LS -0O2- 31111712003 Page 2 of 2 F JAN G!X 13 2004 pg. q d CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: NCWRF Expansion to 24.1 MGD - Liquid Stream PROJECT #: 73950 BIDIRFP #: 02 -3418 MOD #: 02 -04 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $102,100.00 PO #: 4500004112 Work Order #: N/A CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $24,861,000,00 00,00 CURRENT $NC 05DING $ 00 HANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $24,861 TOTAL O AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval :12/17/02 Agenda Item # :10C Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount: 0.77% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): - -- - - - -- GRIT CHAMBER #4 MILESTONE: ORIGINAL: 3/16/04 CURRENT: 3/23/04 PROJECT SUBSTANTIAL: ORIGINAL: 3/16/05 CURRENT: 3/16/05 PROJECT FINAL: ORIGINAL: 6/14/05 CURRENT: 6/14/05 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Materials and labor to complete the additional work described below: 1. Install an additional 60 lineal feet of 24 -inch diameter Aeration Influent piping to the point of connection with future Aeration Basin No. 7. 2. Install an additional 100 lineal feet 24 -inch diameter Aeration Influent piping in then area northwest of existing Aeration Basin No. 4. 3. Revise the vertical alignment of the three (3) 24 -inch Aeration Influent pipelines between Aeration Basin No. 4 and the west side of the existing Operations Building. 4. Additional clearing and grubbing of non - native vegetation, removal of existing fencing, installation of temporary fencing, and installation of permanent fencing. Length of temporary and permanent fencing is approximately 900 lineal feet. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Enumerated below to match summary descriptions above: 1. It was determined that it would be more cost - effective to install the "future" Aeration Basin No. 7 Aeration Influent piping now, before a proposed electrical ductbank was installed across it. If installation of the future pipeline were deferred to the future project, the future Contractor would have been required to hand - excavate below the proposed electrical ductbank to install the new piping. This approach would have resulted in higher installation costs to the County and placed the active electrical ductbank at risk during this future pipeline installation. As such, this item is a project betterment related to a future facility expansion. 2. During construction it was determined that an existing electrical ductbank was located in the proposed alignment of the three 24 -inch Aeration Influent pipelines to Aeration Basins Nos. 5, 6 and 7, respectively. The actual location was not consistent with the location provided on available Contractor - provided record drawings. This item provides additional piping to extend the pipelines further west of the Aeration Basins to avoid conflict with the existing electrical ductbanks. 3. The as -bid Contract Documents required a centerline elevation change (from elevation 3.75' to elevation 6.25) for all three 24 -inch Aeration Influent pipelines as the pipelines are installed between the existing AGa-I ; No. .IAN 1 3 200 ?g.—,2L_ Collier County Public Utilities North Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion to 24.1 MGD - Liquid Stream Change Order No. 2, Mod. No. 02 -4 Building foundation and the existing antennae tower foundation. The higher pipeline elevation was designed to prevent the installing Contractor from undermining either foundation when excavating the pipe trench. Pipe fittings to transition all three pipelines back to elevation 3.75' (to avoid conflict with other buried utilities) were inadvertently omitted from the Contract Drawings. The Engineer and the Contractor jointly determined that the pipeline could be successfully installed by relocating fittings from another location, installing the pipeline under the main plant entrance road at a higher elevation, and encasing the portion of the pipelines under the plant entrance road with reinforced concrete. This approach was actually more cost - effective (by approximately $10,000) than purchasing and installing the three transition fittings referenced above. 4. The relocation of the three 24 -inch Aeration Influent pipelines as described above in item 2 placed the new alignment within an area of non - native vegetation and fencing to be removed and replaced with native landscaping and new fencing under a separate, future project. The new alignment requires that the removal of non - native vegetation and adjacent fencing be transferred from the future landscaping project to this project to facilitate installation of the re- aligned piping. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Project Delivery Team (i.e. - NCWRF Plant Staff, County Project Manager, Engineer, Contractor) IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) roposed change is consistent with the scopei of the existing agreement_ _ �roposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope hange is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement he appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change _ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable CONSULTING ENV)NEE9 REC ENDATION: RECOMMEND: 1W-V Date: Oi DO NOT RECOMMEND: Date: PROJECT MANAGEF Rpc MMENDATION: RECOMMEND: Date: ( 0 DO NOT RECOMMEND: Date: COMMENTS: CDC- LS -0O2- 41111712003 Page 2 of 2 AGENDj► ISE1 JAN 1 3 2( P9•� q 11 CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: NCWRF Expansion to 24.1 MGD - Liquid Stream PROJECT #: 73950 BIDIRFP #: 02 -3418 MOD #: 02 -05 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $8,691.00 PO #: 4500004112 Work Order #: N/A CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $24,861,000.00 CURRENT $25,060,999.00 ISCHANGE ORDER) (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING Last BCC Approved Amount $24, 8 1 00000.0 AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval: 12/17102 Agenda Item # :10C Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount: 0.80% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S1' — — GRIT CHAMBER #4 MILESTONE: ORIGINAL: 3/16!04 CURRENT: 3!23!04 PROJECT SUBSTANTIAL: ORIGINAL: 3/16/05 CURRENT: 3/16/05 PROJECT FINAL: ORIGINAL: 6/14/05 CURRENT: 6/14/05 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Materials and labor to drill and epoxy in place steel reinforcing dowels into concrete walls and slabs of existing Aerated Grit Chamber No. 3 to provide a structural connection between existing Aerated Grit Chamber No. 3 and new Aerated Grit Chamber No. 4. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): During the construction of Aerated Grit Chamber No. 3, female, threaded reinforcing bar couplers had been installed. The intent of design on this project was to install male threaded reinforcing bars into the existing female couplers. The threaded male /female reinforcing bar connections were designed to provide a structural connection between the existing and new reinforced concrete structures. When exposed for construction, it was determined that the existing couplers had experienced enough corrosion to compromise the integrity of the female threads and prevent their use for future construction. The female couplers were abandoned and new rebar was drilled and epoxied into the existing structure. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Project Delivery Team (i.e. - NCWRF Plant Staff, County Project Manager, Engineer, Contractor) IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or NIA) roposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement _ -/Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope hange is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement he appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable F T M 2004 Collier County Public Utilities North Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion to 24.1 MGD - Liquid Stream Change Order No. Z Mod. No. 02 -5 CONSULTING ENqp4EER.REC NDATION: RECOMMEND: Date: 11- �� • 03 DO NOT RECOMMEND: Date: PROJECT MANAG7 RE�C MENDATION: RECOMMEND. Y 7 Date: 03 DO NOT RECOMMEND: - Date: COMMENTS: CDC- LS -0O2- 51111712003 Page 2 of 2 AGENgq I no.�_ .JAN 13 2004 P9. if CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: NCWRF Expansion to 24.1 MGD – Liquid Stream PROJECT #: 73950 BID /RFP #: 02 -3418 MOD #: 02 -06 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $23,508.00 PO #: 4500004112 Work Order #: N/A CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL ($24,861,000N0 CURRENT I 25,08 ,507.00CHANGEORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $24LasT TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval: 12/17102 Agenda Item #:10C Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount: 0.90% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): — ORIGINAL: 3/16/04 CURRENT: 3123/04 GRIT CHAMBER #4 MILESTONE: PROJECT SUBSTANTIAL: ORIGINAL: 3116(05 CURRENT: 3116105 PROJECT FINAL: ORIGINAL: 6/14/05 CURRENT: 6114/05 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Materials and labor to re -route PVC drain piping for the existing Vactor Truck Dump Station and future Effluent Filter No. 6. In addition to additional PVC piping, this change requires one additional drain manhole. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): As shown on the as -bid Contract Drawings, there was an inadvertent conflict in elevations roo 15-inch drain line (from the and future Filter f ) and the proposed i ch ductile iron effluent piping from Clarifier No 8. The two potential solutions were as No. 1. Add four 42 -inch diameter fittings to offset the proposed Clarifier No. 8 effluent pipeline under the proposed 6 -inch gravity drain pipe. 2. Reroute the gravity drain piping from the Vactor Truck Station and future Filter No. 6 to another gravity drain manhole such that the two pipelines would not cross each other. It was determined that solution #2 was the most cost - effective and expedient. No rework was required to incorporate this change. Had this conflict been discovered during the design period, the proposed solution #2 would have been incorporated into bidding documents and the additional costs included in this change item would have been included in a higher lump -sum bid price for the overall project. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Project Delivery Team (i.e. – NCWRF Plant Staff, County Project Manager, Engineer, Contractor) IM LEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or NIA) .® proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement � roposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope hange is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement Ehe appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change roposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable AGEN -I, AG L. AN 1 3 20 Collier County Public Utilities North Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion to 24.1 MGD - Liquid Stream Change Order No. 2, Mod. No. 02 -6 CONSULTING EN EER RECQ MENDATION: RECOMMEND: r Date: 11 - \ *4' Q3 DO NOT RECOMM ND: Date: PROJECT MANAGE RE O MENDATION: RECOMMEND: • �CA4 -t,�" Date: - 3 DO NOT RECOMMEND: Date: COMMENTS: CDC- LS -0O2- 61111712003 Page 2 of 2 AGENDA E� No. LP AIN 1 3 2004 CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: NCWRF Expansion to 24.1 MGD — Liquid Stream PROJECT #: 73950 BID /RFP #: 02 -3418 MOD #: 02 -07 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $11,726.00 PO #: 4500004112 Work Order #: N/A CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL ($TAR (STARTING POIN) CURRENT (INCLUDING THIOSOCHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $248O TOTAL (LAST AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval: 12/17/02 Agenda Item #:10C Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount:0.95% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing .report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE LS):_ GRIT CHAMBER #4 MILESTONE: ORIGINAL: 3!16/04 CURREN T: 3/23/04 PROJECT SUBSTANTIAL: ORIGINAL: 3/16!05 CURRENT: 3/16/05 PROJECT FINAL: ORIGINAL: 6/14/05 CURRENT: 6/14/05 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Materials and labor to substitute an alternate type and model of dissolved oxygen analyzer /transmitter for the type and model specified and bid for the twenty (20) units required at Aeration Basins 4, 5 and 6. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): The substituted type and model utilizes a newer state -of- the -art technology that was not available during the project design phase. At the Engineer's request, the manufacturer placed a demonstration unit in service at one of the plant's oxidation ditches. Plant staff was pleased with the under accuracy and performance of the demonstration newer technology. Thge newerttechno olgyoshould provide arlonger service this project be provided based life, more accurate and repeatable measurement, and require less cleaning and maintenance. All of these benefits should reduce future operation and maintenance costs of the dissolved oxygen analyzers. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Project Delivery Team (i.e. - NCWRF Plant Staff, County Project Manager, Engineer, Contractor) IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or NIA) •� Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement �roposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope �hange is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change -®Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable AGE No. JAN 1 3 2004 Pg. -1-9- Collier County Public Utilities North Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion to 24.1 MGD — Liquid Stream Change Order No. 2, Mod. No. 02 -7 CONSULTING E INEE A Q ENDATION: RECOMMEND: �p Date: I O' 003 DO NOT RECOM END: Date: PROJECT MANAG RE�O MENDATION: RECOMMEND: Date: o DO NOT RECOMMEND: Date: COMMENTS: CDC- LS -0O2- 71111712003 Page 2 of 2 GE ANpA I�AZ A No. E_ JAN 1 3l! 2004 Pg•. ��— qti. CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: NCWRF Expansion to 24.1 MGD - Liquid Stream PROJECT #: 73950 BIDIRFP #: 02 -3418 MOD #: 02 -08 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $43,217.00 PO #: 4500004112 Work Order #: N/A CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $24,861,000-00 0 t 1, 00.0 CURRENT 25,13 , T 4 O.00 t$ RANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $248O TOTAL (LAST AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval: 12/17/02 Agenda Item # 1 OC Percentage of the change overfunder current contract amount:1.12% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE _(S): -- - GRIT CHAMBER #4 MILESTONE: ORIGINAL. 3116104 CURRENT: 3/23/04 PROJECT SUBSTANTIAL: ORIGINAL: 3/16/05 CURRENT: 3/16/05 PROJECT FINAL: ORIGINAL: 6/14/05 CURRENT: 6/14/05 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Materials and labor related to installation of the 48 -inch diameter ductile -iron reclaimed water pipeline between the proposed Reclaimed Water Control Structure and the existing Reclaimed Water Pumping Station. Additional work includes installation of one vertical offset fitting and additional excavation, dewatering and backfill to lower a segment of the pipeline JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): The 48 -inch pipeline must be lowered to pass under an existing storm water drainage canal. The lower centerline elevation was shown on the contract drawings at the point of connection to the Reclaimed Water Pumping Station. However, the required vertical offset fitting and lower pipe centerline elevation were inadvertently omitted from the contract yard piping drawings. Had the fitting and lower elevation been noted on the contract yard piping drawings, the additional costs included in this change item would have been included in a higher lump -sum bid price for the overall project. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Project Delivery Team (i.e. - NCWRF Plant Staff, County Project Manager, Engineer, Contractor) IM LEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or NIA) ,proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement �roposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope �hange is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement _The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change -Troposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable o. No. J A[d 1 3 2004 P9._ Collier County Public Utilities North Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion to 24.1 MG — Liquid Stream Change Order No. 2, Mod. No. 02 -8 CONSULTING E INEE REC ENDATION: RECOMMEND: Date: op I)- DO NOT RECOM END: Date: PROJECT MANAGER RE�CO MENDATION: RECOMMEND: • Date: DO NOT RECOMMEND: Date: COMMENTS: CDC- LS -0O2- 81111712003 Page 2 of 2 AGENDA I JKM Nc — JAN 13 2004 Pg. CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: NCWRF Expansion to 24.1 MGD - Liquid Stream PROJECT #: 73950 BID /RFP #: 02 -3418 MOD #: 02 -09 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $0.00 PO #: 4500004112 Work Order #: N/A CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $24,861,000.00 CURRENT 5.13 4 THIS 0.00 CHANGE ORDER) (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING Last BCC Approved Amount $24LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval: 12/17/02 Agenda Item # 1 O(C) Percentage of the change overlunder current contract amount: 1.12 % Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): _ - -- — GRIT CHAMBER #4 MILESTONE: MIGFN PROJECT SUBSTANTIAL: ORIGINAL: 3/16/05 CURRENT: 3123105 PROJECT FINAL: ORIGINAL: 6/14/05 CURRENT: 6/14/05 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Addition of seven (7) calendar days to the construction period to substantial project completion. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): The County requested that the Contractor perform additional work to repair minor leaks on a sludge pipeline east of Sludge Pump Station No. 4. The repairs were required to repair defective work installed by others on a previous construction project. The current Contractor dedicated his piping crew to this work, thereby deferring contract (piping) work that is on the critical path of the current construction schedule. Since the repair work impacted the Contractor's critical path, the corresponding number of days is hereby added to the contract schedule for overall substantial completion. 'PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Project Delivery Team (i.e. - NCWRF Plant Staff, County Project Manager, Engineer, Contractor) IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) cc✓✓Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement ��" roposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement -✓yhe appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change _ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable AGE A� I .. • � No. JAN 1 3 200 Pg. Collier County Public Utilities North Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion to 24.1 MGD — Liquid Stream Change Order No. 2, Mod. No. 02 -9 CONSULTING ENVIt4EER REC DATION: RECOMMEND: Date: DO NOT RECOMMEND: Date: PROJECT MANAG 5!E NDATION: RECOMMEND: 'r OMME S� Date: DO NOT RECOMMEND. Date: COMMENTS: CDC- LS -0O2- 91111712003 Page 2 of 2 AGE ArI ,M' No. JAN 1 3 2001 Pg. CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Belt Press Walkway Additions PROJECT #: none BID /RFP #: 03 -3499R MOD #: 1 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $ 1,564 PO #: 4500012743 Work Order #: n/a CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 39,500.00 _ CURREINCLUDI 41,0 4.00 E ORDER) (STARTING POINT) Last BCC Approved Amount $ 9 (LAST 000.00 T. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval 6/24/03 Agenda Item # 16.C.4 Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount 4.0 % Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: 9/26/03 CURRENT: 12/24/03 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Extension of Proiect timeline to 12/24/03 89 additional days). Addition of 6 aluminum handrails and Installation of stainless steel safety chains with eyebolts at 3 landings as recommended in County's Consultant's Observation Report attached durina. Punch List review. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): The delay in the project was caused by a _ delay in obtaining aluminum grating for the project see attached letter from NR Contractors j-_ The items listed in the above "Summary " address safe concerns for maintenance personnel involved in hosing andspraying down the Belt Filter Presses and were not included in the original construction plan drawings andspecific itions. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: consultant SCWRF Superintendant and Operations personnel IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) Y Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement N Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement Y The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change Y Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE: X Date: DISAPPROVE: Date: COMMENTS: This Change Order will be the only one for this project. AGE I m No. 7A-& ` REVISED 9/9/03 ' JAN 1 3 2004 Pg. CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Transfer Road Improvements PROJECT #: 69110 BID /RFP #: 03 -3453 MOD #: 02 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $_11,676.15 PO #: _4500011095 Work Order #:-02 CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ _580,945.70_ CURRENT $_595,879.83_ (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $_�� S4�S: ?U (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval-4/22/2003 Agenda Item # _16 B -4 Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount-2.0 % Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: 12/03/2003 CURRENT: 1 /24/2004 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): 1. Design of the wing walls for box culvert on Lot 8 & Lot 29. 2. Shop drawings, Submittals & Observations. 3. Mobilization / Management of wing walls design. 4. Additional excavation. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Upon review of the construction plans and existing field conditions, TECMD requested the design of wing walls for box culvert. Original plans called for the construction of the wing walls according to DESIGN STANDARDS 2002, Index 290. Based on the design changes the contractor should be compensated for remobilization, management, structural engineering services and additional excavation. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Robbie Powell, Better Roads, Inc. Gregg Strakaluse, Director TECMD, Lynn Thorpe, Principal Project Manager TECMD. IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) _x_ Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement _x_ Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope _x_ Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement _x_ The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change _x_ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT MANAGER REC MENDATION: APPROVE: �7�0� Date: 12 ,$- 12 DISAPPROVE: Date: COMMENTS: Revised 8/22/03 AGE1j A�IJ M JAN 1312004 P9• CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: NCWRF Expansion to 24.1 MGD — Liquid Stream PROJECT #: 73950 BID /RFP #: 02 -3418 MOD #: 03 -01 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $200,000.00 PO #: 4500004112 Work Order #: N/A CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $24,861,000.00 CURRENT $25,339,450.00 THIS ORDER) (STARTING POINT) Last BCC Approved Amount $24LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval: 12/17/02 Agenda Item # 10(C) Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount: 1.92% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: 3/16/04 CURRENT: 3/23/04 GRIT CHAMBER #4 MILESTONE: ORIGINAL: 3/16/05 CURRENT: 3/23/05 PROJECT SUBSTANTIAL: PROJECT FINAL: ORIGINAL: 6/14105 CURRENT: 6!14/05 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Transfer from the Expansion to 24.1 MGD — Solids Stream contract to this Liquid Stream contract of an allowance item for implementation of a temporary odor control system to serve the Pretreatment Building and Sludge Gravity Thickeners Nos. 1 and 2 during a 10 -month period while permanent odor control systems are relocated to suit construction. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): The Solids Stream contract currently contains a $200,000 allowance item for the temporary odor control system. It has become more prudent to transfer the scope of work for the temporary odor control system to the Liquid Stream construction contract for the following reasons: 1. The Liquid Stream contractor needs to implement the temporary odor control facilities as soon as possible to expedite his contract work in this area. Specifically, the Liquid Stream contractor needs to relocate the existing Pretreatment/Thickener Odor Control System out of its current location in order to install three 24- inch buried aeration influent pipeline in accordance with the critical path of his construction schedule. If the Solids Stream contractor implements the temporary odor control system, there would likely be additional impacts /delays to the Liquid Stream schedule. 2. The temporary odor control system was originally designed to be a leased activated carbon unit to serve the Pretreatment Building and Sludge Gravity Thickeners until a chemical wet scrubber system could be relocated to the Aeration Basins and a larger wet scrubber could be relocated to serve the Pretreatment Building and sludge tanks. The relocation of the chemical scrubber to the Aeration Basins is the responsibility of the Liquid Stream contractor. The County recently stated their preference not to implement an activated carbon -based system. Since the original design intent for temporary odor control was formulated, the County and Engineer have jointly agreed to install a new biofiltration odor control system as a temporary odor control unit, and then relocate the unit for permanent use at the Aeration Basins. The Engineer's 20 -year life -cycle cost analysis indicates that a permanent biofiltration system will result in a net savings of $300,000 over the chemical wet scrubber system. AGENDA I No. v JAN 1 3004 P9•_ Collier County Public Utilities North Regional Water Reclamation Facility Expansion to 24.1 MGD - Liquid Stream Change Order No. 3, Mod. No. 03 -01 The additional cost of this change order item is canceled out by a corresponding $200,000 credit to the Solids Stream contract. This, in effect, is a transfer of funds between the two projects. As stated above, the revised approach will save the County approximately $300,000 over the next 20 years. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Project Delivery Team (i.e. - NCWRF Plant Staff, County Project Manager, Engineer, Contractor) IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or NIA) �roposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement _ The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change (Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable CONSULTING E GIN ER C MMENDATION: RECOMMEND: Date: 1'1- Ot-VI DO NOT RECD END: Date: PROJECT MANAG ECOMM NDATION: RECOMMEND: Date: DO NOT RECOMM ND: Date: COMMENTS: CDC- LS -0O3- 1121312003 AGE No. Page 2 of 2 JAN 13 2004 P9• 2 F46 CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: US 41 N Phase 11 PROJECT #: 67051 BID /RFP #: 02- 3365MOD #: 5 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $_$1868.25_ PO #: 4500009422 Work Order #: CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 253,925.84 CURRENT $INCL , 9-09IS CHANGE ORDER) (STARTING POINT) Last BCC Approved Amount $253,925.84 (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval N/A Agenda Item # _N /A Percentage of the change overlunder current contract amount % Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: NIA CURRENT: N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Quantities specified for the delivery of Muhly grass in the original bid schedule and construction varied from the quantities specified in addendum #5. Change order needed to pay contractor for the quantities as set forth in the addendum and were delivered JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Project Manager did not learn of the discrepancy in the quantities until after product had been delivered and installed. Having reviewed this matter with Purchasing staff, we have agreed to pay for the additional quantities. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Jim Albury, Steve Carnell IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or NIA) X Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement _ Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope X Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement X The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change X Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT M E MENDATION: IZ_ 2�- APPROVE: Date: DISAPPROVE: Date: COMMENTS: REVISED 9/9/03 ADEN IT LM� No. J Ail 1 3 P9• CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Immokalee Branch Library Expansion PROJECT #: 33776 BID /RFP #: 02- 3405MOD #: 3 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $31,198.00 PO #: 4500001967 Work Order #: CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 490,000.00 CURRENT 529,935.00 (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $490,000.00 (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval9 /11/02 Agenda Item # 16 D 10 Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount 8.!�K% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: 2/01104 CURRENT:02 /01104 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Concrete block wall and footing required by Collier County Inspection for mechanical room separation, aluminum door to wood door, add interior storefront material for partition at left of main entrance, add exit sign, repaint interior and exterior of existing facility, reroof entire existing facility. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Owner requested. PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Jack Crognale, Skip Camp, & Steve Carnell IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or NIA) y_ Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement y_ Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope y_ Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement y_ The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change y_ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT MAN GER RECOM AENDATION: APPROVE: Date: DISAPPRO z Date: COMMENT REVISED 9/9/03 AGE No. i JAIL 133 2004 pg.-35 CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Naples Jail PROJECT #: 52008 BID /RFP #: 99- 2829MOD #: 6 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $(1,323,210.72) PO #: 4500012306 Work Order #: CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 34,402,176.00 CURREN(INCLUDING $25,336,847.29 s CHANGE ORDER) (STARTING POINT) Last BCC Approved Amount $29LASg TOTAL MT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approva19 /9/03 Agenda Item # 16 F 1 Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount — 13.76% Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: 6/13/05 CURRENT:6 /13/05 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Direct Material Purchase JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Tax Savings PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Skip Camp Jack Crognale & Steve Carnell IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) Y_ Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement Y_ Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope Y_ Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement Y_ The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change Y_ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT MAN 2— E ECOM NDATION: z a APPROVE: r� Date: DISAPPR Date: COMME S: REVISED 9/9/03 AGE VA I No. J JAN 13 2004 Pg. CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Naples Jail PROJECT #: 52008 BID /RFP #: 99 -2829 MOD #: 7 AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE 11,757.87 PO #: 4500012306 Work Order #: CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 34,402,176.00 CURRENT $25,348,605.16 (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $29,379,175.70 (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approva19 /9/03 Agenda Item # 16 F 1, Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount —13.72 Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) -1 Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: 6/13/05 CURRENT:6 /13105 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): Void Direct Material Purchase Order Deduct Direct Material Purchase Order, Issue another purchase order. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Tax Savings PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Skip Camp, Jack Crognale & Steve Carnell IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or N /A) Y_ Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement Y_ Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope Y_ Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement Y_ The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change Y_ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT MANA R R COMMENDATION: � APPROVE: _ ,.� Date: `3 DISAPPROVE Date: COMMENTS: REVISED 9/9/03 AGENO9 I7f i� No. %( L1AN3 2004 � '_j CONTRACT MODIFICATION CHECKLIST FORM PROJECT NAME: Community Development Services Additional & Garage BIDIRFP #: 00 -3064 MOD #: 11 PO #: 4500016724 Work Order #: AMOUNT OF THIS CHANGE $5,620.53 PROJECT #: 0 CONTRACT AMOUNT: ORIGINAL $ 6,049,635.00 CURRENT 6,232,009.47 (STARTING POINT) (INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER) Last BCC Approved Amount $6,049,635.00 (LAST TOTAL AMT. REQUIRING BCC APPROVAL) Date of Last BCC Approval Agenda Item August 1,2000 16 E 13 Percentage of the change over /under current contract amount 4 % 3 • D I Formula: (Current Amount / Last BCC approved amount) Results and Actions: If the change exceeds 10% BCC approval is required; under 10% reported to BCC on Purchasing report. CURRENT COMPLETION DATE (S): ORIGINAL: 10/31/03 CURRENT: 11/07/04 Substantial Completed SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGE (S): The County made several last minute changes, which Kraft completed as a service to Collier County. Landscaping, add a door, add signs, add frame for added office. JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE (S): Requested by owner PARTIES CONTACTED REGARDING THE CHANGE: Skip Camp and Jack Crognale. IMPLEMENTATION STEPS (Verify each before proceeding with change using Y, N or NIA) Y Proposed change is consistent with the scope of the existing agreement Y Proposed change is in fact an addition or deletion to the existing scope Y Change is being implemented in a manner consistent with the existing agreement Y_ The appropriate parties have been consulted regarding the change _ _Y_ Proposed prices, fees and costs set forth in the change are reasonable PROJECT MANAG R COMMENDATION: APPROVE: Date: DISAPPROV Date: COMMEN REVISED 9/9/03 AGEND IT No. JAN 13 2004 P9• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AUTHORIZATION TO ADD TWO POSITION CLASSIFICATION TITLES TO THE FISCAL YEAR 04 PAY AND CLASSIFICATION PLAN OBJECTIVE: Approve planned changes within the Community Development and Environmental Services Division to insure organizational effectiveness in the Current Planning, Comprehensive Planning, and Tourism efforts. CONSIDERATION: On or about November 1, 2003, County Manager Jim Mudd approved the internal reorganization of functions and responsibilities within the Community Development and Environmental Services Division. The resulting action eliminated the Planning Services Director, elevated the position of Current Planning Manager to Director, Department of Zoning and Land Development Review (pay grade 30), elevated the Comprehensive Planning Manger position, to Director, Comprehensive Planning Department (pay grade 30) and moved the Tourism Department to direct oversight of the County Manager. The details of this plan were communicated to the Board through a memorandum from the County Manager dated October 30, 2003. In order to formalize this personnel action, the Clerk of Courts has asked that these new titles be formally adopted into the FY 04 pay and classification plan. FISCAL IMPACT: By eliminating the Planning Services Director position and dividing the responsibilities between the two new planning positions, there will be a savings to the County of $75,947.00. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated with this Executive Summary. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the addition of the positions Director, Department of Zoning and Land Development Review and Director, Comprehensive Planning Department to the Fiscal Year 2004 Pay and Classification Plan. SUBMITTED BY: Donald Albonesi, Compensation Manager Human Resources Department REVIEWED BY: Mfin Dir, ctor, Human esourc p nt DATE. / ©/ DATE: _ l - 1-0 q APPROVED BY: DATE: i % O Len Price Administrator Administrative Services Division •' "OU_111 DATE: / UO Leo Ochs, Dep C unty Manager AGENI'DA ITEM Ito. iGr J A IN 1 3 2004 Pg. 2— Code: 13803 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CLASSIFICATION SPECIFICATION CLASSIFICATION TITLE: DIRECTOR, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PURPOSE OF CLASSIFICATION The purpose of this classification is to carry out the policy direction of the Board of County Commissioners related to the administration and implementation of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) in compliance with Florida Statutes and Rules, other State and regional planning actions as may be mandated by the Legislature, and local planning initiatives as directed by the Board of County Commissioners. Administratively manages the Collier County Redevelopment Agency (CRA) and the conduct of the redevelopment and community based planning initiatives and studies of the CRA and their subsequent implementation. Develops and applies the Land Development Code specific to GMP programs implementation including concurrency, Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), and the Rural Lands Stewardship Program. Administratively manages the establishment of Special Districts by the Board and their subsequent monitoring and reporting. Administers the Fiscal Impact Analysis Model (FIAM). ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS The following duties are normal for this position. The omission of specific statements of the duties does not exclude them from the classification if the work is similar, related, or a logical assignment for this classification. Other duties may be required and assigned. Develops and implements short -, mid -, and long -term departmental strategies and goals; conducts semi - annual and annual departmental evaluation against goals. Develops annual department budget. Develops, interprets, administers and amends the Growth Management Plan. Maintains the Concurrency Management System in order to insure the public infrastructure (roads, water, sewer, public safety facilities, etc.) necessary to support growth and land development in the County are available. Prepares the Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR). Reviews and analyzes amendments and rezone petitions to determine consistency and statutory compliance. Resolves outstanding issues pertaining to the interpretation of the Growth Management Plan. Oversees the implementation of joint school planning committees with the Collier County School Board. Oversees the creation and implementation of special districts by developing resolutions and ordinances for BCC approval. Negotiates the terms of the special districts and drafts legislation. Assigns projects, land development petitions, comprehensive plan amendments, and correspondence to staff; assigns and oversees Board of County Commissioner (BCC), County Manager, and Division Administrator directed projects to staff; monitors directed projects; reviews monthly activity measure reports; prepares and reviews progress reports on assigned projects. Supervises, directs, and evaluates assigned staff, processing employee concerns and problems, directing work, counseling, disciplining, developing KRAs and completing employee performance appraisals; reviews and approves payroll; develops action plans for key supervisory staff and selected managers; reviews and approves evg}eatie © DMG- MAXIMUS, INC. Page 1 Last Revised: No. 14 t' C.a rf 3 2004 Pg. Collier County, Florida • Director, Comprehensive Planning Code: 13803 action plans for all departmental staff, interviews prospective employees; conducts training for new and existing employees. Provides liaison with elected and appointed officials of state and regional agencies on Growth Management issues and County initiatives. Reviews and approves staff reports for Environmental Advisory Council, Planning Commission, and other BCC advisory boards; prepares, reviews and approves executive summaries for all departmental BCC items; presents items and makes recommendations to BCC. Attends meetings, conducts research, and makes presentations as staff liaison to BCC appointed advisory committees including the Environmental Advisory Council and the Planning Commission. Keeps abreast of pending state legislation and rule changes related to growth management, natural resources protection, and land use issues. Oversees the Collier County Financial Impact Analysis Model and other County econometric, demographic models and population projections. Administers the Community Redevelopment Agency in order to devise redevelopment plans, develop incentive plans, develop refurbishment programs and assemble properties for redevelopment. Acts as the Community Redevelopment Agency Manager. Meets with key supervisory staff regularly to identify progress on tasks, problems, and resource issues; meets with community and neighborhood associations; meets with citizens and development industry to resolve issues; participates in professional development opportunities; attends BCC meetings and advisory board meetings; meets with County staff, peers, subordinates and superiors. Conducts ongoing and annual procedural audits; conducts surveys of various interest groups. Cooperates on long term planning matters with various state and federal agencies and with Collier County legislatures Assigns and oversees Comprehensive Plan amendment processes; assigns and oversees numerous special assignments, including development of overlays, neighborhood planning initiatives, rural area assessments, and paper to electronic file conversion. Develops and implements public outreach and public involvement plans, particularly focusing on the use of enhanced web -based technologies. Oversees and administers the Collier county Rural Lands Stewardship Credit Program and the Collier County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Program. Operates a computer, printer, copier, facsimile machine, telephone, motor vehicle, or other equipment as necessary to complete essential functions, to include the use of word processing, spreadsheet, database, or other system software. ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONS Reviews correspondence and responses prepared by staff. Addresses issues that arise during review process. Handles telephone calls from the public and/or development industry on specific project related issues. AGENDA ITEM No._,i,i� L-o JAN 13 2004 pg._ %q- © DMG- MAXIMUS, INC. Page 2 Last Revised: October, 2003 Collier County, Florida • Director, Comprehensive Planning Code: 13803 Copies documents; prepares purchase orders. Performs other related duties as required. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Master's degree in Planning, Public Administration, or a closely related field; six years of experience in professional planning and management in a comparable community; or any equivalent combination of education, training, and experience which provides the requisite knowledge, skills, and abilities for this job. Must possess and maintain a valid Florida driver's license. PERFORMANCE APTITUDES Data Utilization: Requires the ability to coordinate, manage, and /or correlate data. Includes exercising judgment in determining time, place and /or sequence of operations, referencing data analyses to determine necessity for revision of organizational components, and in the formulation of operational strategy. Human Interaction: Requires the ability to function in a director capacity for a major organizational unit requiring significant internal and external interaction. Equipment, Machinery, Tools, and Materials Utilization: Requires the ability to operate, maneuver and /or control the actions of equipment, machinery, tools, and /or materials used in performing essential functions. Verbal Aptitude: Requires the ability to utilize consulting and advisory data and information, as well as reference, descriptive and /or design data and information as applicable. Mathematical Aptitude: Requires the ability to perform addition, subtraction, multiplication and division; ability to calculate decimals and percentages; may include ability to perform mathematical operations with fractions; may include ability to compute discount, interest, profit and loss, ratio and proportion; may include ability to calculate surface areas, volumes, weights, and measures. Functional Reasoning: Requires the ability to apply principles of logical or synthesis functions; to deal with several concrete and abstract variables; and to analyze major problems that require complex planning for interrelated activities that can span one or several work units. Situational Reasoning: Requires the ability to exercise judgment, decisiveness and creativity in situations involving broader aspects of organizational programs and operations, moderately unstable situations, or the direction, control and planning of an entire program or set of programs. Leadership: Customer Service: Financial Accountability: ADA COMPLIANCE Physical Ability: Tasks require the ability to exert light physical effort in sedentary to light work, but which may involve some lifting, carrying, pushing and /or pulling of objects and materials of light weight (5 -10 pounds). Tasks may involve extended periods of time at a keyboard or workstation. (D DMG- MAXIMUS, INC. Page 3 No. ILA 6U Last Revis d: 014Kr) 2302004 PQ. - Collier County, Florida • Director, Comprehensive Planning Code: 13803 Sensory Requirements: Some tasks require the ability to perceive and discriminate visual cues or signals. Some tasks require the ability to communicate orally. Environmental Factors: Essential functions are regularly performed without exposure to adverse environmental conditions. Collier County is an Equal Opportunity Employer. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the County will provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities and encourages both prospective and current employees to discuss potential accommodations with the employer. NM_ j" U C U, © DMG- MAXIMUS, INC. Page 4 Last Reviled: J 0M M04 Pg._ �j_ Code: 13802 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CLASSIFICATION SPECIFICATION CLASSIFICATION TITLE: DIRECTOR, ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT PURPOSE OF CLASS I14CATION The purpose of this classification is to carry out the policy direction of the Board of County Commissioners related to ,growth management and land development through the implementation of the Growth Management Plan's (GMP) goals, policies, and objectives specifically through the development, implementation, interpretation, administration and oversight of the County's Land Development Code (LDC). This position oversees the review of all development plans and evaluates the proposed use of land for structures, roads, utilities, landscaping, etc.; issues land use permits; reviews, analyzes and makes recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners on all land use applications (rezonings, PUDs, conditional uses and variance applications); provides information to the public on the LDC and GMP. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS The following duties are normal for this position. The omission of specific statements of the duties does not exclude them from the classification if the work is similar, related, or a logical assignment for this classification. Other duties may be required and assigned. Develops and implements short-, mid -, and long -term departmental strategies, business plans and goals; conducts semi- annual and annual departmental evaluation against goals. Develops annual budget. Applies, interprets and amends the Collier County Land Development Code to ensure that the zoning regulations are consistent with the substance and intent of the GMP. Applies and interprets the GMP. Assigns projects, land development petitions, and correspondence to staff, assigns and oversees Board of County Commissioner (BCC), County Manager, and Division Administrator directed projects to staff; monitors directed projects; reviews monthly activity measure reports; prepares and reviews progress reports on assigned projects. Supervises, directs, and evaluates assigned staff, processing employee concerns and problems, directing work, counseling, disciplining, developing KRAs and completing employee performance appraisals; reviews and approves payroll; develops action plans for key supervisory staff and selected managers; reviews and approves evaluations and action plans for all departmental staff; interviews prospective employees; conducts training for new and existing employees. Reviews and approves staff reports for Environmental Advisory Council, Planning Commission, and other BCC advisory boards; prepares, reviews and approves executive summaries for all departmental BCC items; presents items and makes recommendations to BCC. Provides land use information to citizen "walk- ins." Attends meetings, conducts research, and makes presentations as staff support to several BCC appointed advisory committees such as the Planning Commission. Keeps abreast of pending state legislation and rule changes related to growth management, natural resources protection, and land use issues. © DMG- MAXIMUS, INC. Na- • 1(� l.0 Page I Last evise YA : October, P, �� Collier County, Florida • Director, Zoning and Land Development Code: 13802 Reviews all development plans, meets with developers, interprets zoning regulations and resolves outstanding development review issues. Reviews all requests for rezoning to ensure that proposed land use is consistent with the intent of the GMP and conforms to the regulations in the LDC. Develops "overlays" and completes other special planning research and studies. Meets with key supervisory staff regularly to identify progress on tasks, problems, and resource issues; meets with community and neighborhood associations; meets with citizens and development industry to resolve issues; participates in professional development opportunities; attends BCC meetings and advisory board meetings; meets with County staff, including peers, subordinates and superiors. Conducts ongoing and annual procedural audits; conducts surveys of various interest groups. Cooperates with various state and federal agencies, other BCC divisions and departments and the County Attorney's Office. Reviews proposed land use code for special districts to ensure that proposed land use conforms to good planning principles and the intent of the GMP and LDC. Assigns, manages and oversees the Land Development Code amendment processes; assigns, manages, and oversees numerous special assignments, including development of overlays, neighborhood planning initiatives, rural area assessments, and paper to electronic file conversion. Develops and implements public outreach and public involvement plans, particularly focusing on the use of enhanced web -based technologies. Attends public meetings related to land use within the County. Operates a computer, printer, copier, facsimile machine, telephone, motor vehicle, or other equipment as necessary to complete essential functions, to include the use of word processing, spreadsheet, database, or other system software. ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONS Reviews correspondence and responses prepared by staff. Addresses issues that arise during review process. Responds to from the public and/or development industry on specific project related issues. Copies documents; prepares purchase orders. Performs other related duties as required. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Master's degree in Planning, Public Administration, or a closely related field; six years of experience in professional planning and management in a comparable community; or any equivalent combination of education, training, and experience which provides the requisite knowledge, skills, and abilities for this job. Must possess and maintain a valid Florida driver's license. © DMG -MAXI IUS, INC. Page 2 Last AGENDA ITEM A No._ � U l; JAN 13 2004 R wised: October( , 2003 PE. a Collier County, Florida • Director, Zoning and Land Development Code: 13802 PERFORMANCE APTITUDES Data Utilization: Requires the ability to coordinate, manage, and /or correlate data. Includes exercising judgment in determining time, place and /or sequence of operations, referencing data analyses to determine necessity for revision of organizational components, and in the formulation of operational strategy. Human Interaction: Requires the ability to function in a director capacity for a major organizational unit requiring significant internal and external interaction. Equipment, Machinery, Tools, and Materials Utilization: Requires the ability to operate, maneuver and /or control the actions of equipment, machinery, tools, and /or materials used in performing essential functions. Verbal Aptitude: Requires the ability to utilize consulting and advisory data and information, as well as reference, descriptive and /or design data and information as applicable. Mathematical Aptitude: Requires the ability to perform addition, subtraction, multiplication and division; ability to calculate decimals and percentages; may include ability to perform mathematical operations with fractions; may include ability to compute discount, interest, profit and loss, ratio and proportion; may include ability to calculate surface areas, volumes, weights, and measures. Functional Reasoning: Requires the ability to apply principles of logical or synthesis functions: to deal with several concrete and abstract variables; and to analyze major problems that require complex planning for interrelated activities that can span one or several work units. Situational Reasoning: Requires the ability to exercise judgment, decisiveness and creativity in situations involving broader aspects of organizational programs and operations, moderately unstable situations, or the direction, control and planning of an entire program or set of programs. Leadership: Customer Service: Financial Accountability: ADA COMPLIANCE Physical Ability: Tasks require the ability to exert light physical effort in sedentary to light work, but which may involve some lifting, carrying, pushing and/or pulling of objects and materials of light weight (5 -10 pounds). Tasks may involve extended periods of time at a keyboard or workstation. Sensory Requirements: Some tasks require the ability to perceive and discriminate visual cues'or signals. Some tasks require the ability to communicate orally. Environmental Factors: Essential functions are regularly performed without exposure to adverse environmental conditions. Collier County is an Equal Opportunity Employer. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the County will provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities and encoura both nrosnective anti current employees to discuss potential accommodations with the employer. AQV0A f EM (,,g "c�:- L-0 JAN 13 2004 Pg.- _ 0 DMG- NIAXIMUS, INC. Page 3 Last Revised: October, 2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AWARD A CONTRACT TO SCHENKEL & SHULTZ, INC. FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE NAPLES JAIL CENTER, REVISED CONTRACT NUMBER 98 -2867 -2004, IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $845,510.00 OBJECTIVE: To receive approval to award the reassignment of remaining work to be completed under contract 98 -2867, the Naples Jail Center, to Schenkel & Schultz, Inc. CONSIDERATIONS: On December 2, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners approved the termination of contract No. 98 -2867, Amendment No. 4, the Naples Jail Center, Agenda Item (16)(K)(2). Subsequently, the originally awarded firm, AEC National, was removed from the project. To continue the project without interruption, an interim work order was generated under Contract No. 01 -3235, Fixed Term Professional Architectural Services, to Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. The Board of County Commissioners approved the work order on December 16, 2003; agenda item 10M. The work order commenced on December 28, 2003 and will expire on January 16, 2004. Staff agreed that during this time frame, a contract would be negotiated with Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. Negotiations were held with Schenkel Shultz, resulting in the development of a standard County Attorney approved contract. The revised contract will cover the remaining Scope of Services through the duration of the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The funding for this award is available in the present Project budget. It will consist of the remaining balance of $324,575 in the AEC Purchase Order and the balance of $520,850 will be paid out of the County's Project contingency. In addition, it is anticipated that funds will be available -- from AEC's insurance company to cover the impact to the existing project budget. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There should be no impact to the County's Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners award Contract No. 98 -2867- 2004 for continuing architectural services for the Naples Jail Center to Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. and further authorize the Chairman to sign the standard County Attorney approved contract. SUBMITTED BY: Crognale, Prirfcipal Project Manager rtment of Facilities Management REVIEWED BY: S Camp, CFM, Direct r Department of Facilities Management REVIEWED BY: Step en Y. darnell, Director Purchasing Department DATE: / Z a�-- DATE: DATE APPROVED BY: DATE Len Go l n Price, Administrator Administrative Services Division ( �? �acf tl0,_14-e�Z APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENTS BCC Agenda of January 13, 2004 Museum (Fund 198) Budget Amendment #04 -080 Capital Building Improvements $8,415 Reserves Reserve for Contingencies (8,415) Total -p- Explanation: Funds are needed for unanticipated renovation expenses for the main house at Robert's Ranch. AGE-11DA ITEM - m c! /(, r' Pg.— , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE January 13, 2004 FOR BOARD ACTION: 1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED: A. Districts: Lely Community Development District — Minutes of April 16, 2003; May 21, 2003; June 18, 2003; July 2, 2003; August 13, 2003; September 17, 2003; October 22, 2003. 2. Tuscany Reserve Community District — Minutes of July 10, 2003; Adopted Budget for FY 2004. B. Minutes: 1. Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee Meeting — Minutes of September 22, 2003. 2. Collier County Citizens Corps Advisory Committee — Agenda for October 16, 2003 Minutes of October 16, 2003; . Notice of Date Change for various Sunshine /Public Records /Ethics Laws and Ex -Parte Requirements. 3. Vanderbilt Beach M.S.T.U. — Agenda for December 4, 2003; Minutes of November 5, 2003; Notice of Date Change for various Sunshine/Public Records /Ethics Laws and Ex -Parte Requirements. Agenda for November 5, 2003; Minutes of October 2, 2003. 4. Collier County Airport Authority - Agenda for December 8, 2003. 5. Collier County Planning Commission — Agenda for December 4, 2003 and December 18, 2003; Minutes of November 6, 2003, Minutes of November 13 CCPC with LDC, 2003, Regular Meeting Minutes of November 20; Meeting Minutes of November 20 with CCPC/LDC 2003. Q r� H:Data/Format Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage M.S.T.0 Advisory Committee — Minutes of November 19, 2003, Agenda for December 17, 2003. Environmental Advisory Council — Minutes of October 1, 2003; November 5, 2003; LDC Amendments for 2003 - Cycle 3; Agenda for December 8, 2003. AGENDA ITEM No .�,.f -1-- -- JAN 13 2004 Pg. C H:Data/Format 8. Pelican Bay Services - Agenda for December 3, 2003; Minutes of November 5, 2003; Budget Sub - Committee Minutes for November 13, 2003. 9. Collier County Hispanic Affairs Advisory Committee — Agenda for November 20, 2003. 10. Citizen's Advisory Task Force — Agenda for September 18, 2003; Minutes of September 18, 2003. 11, Ochopee Fire Control District — Minutes of October 14, 2003. 12. Collier County Emergency Medical Services Advisory Committee — Minutes of October 29, 2003; EMSAC Schedule for 2004. 13. Collier County Productivity Committee — Agenda for November 19, 2003; Minutes of October 15, 2003. 14. Bayshore Beautification M.S.T.U. — Agenda for December 10, 2003; Minutes of November 12, 2003. 15. Community Character /Smart Growth Advisory Committee — Agenda and Minutes of October 8, 2003; October 22, 2003 and November 14, 2003. Other: 1) Guy L. Carlton, Collier County Tax Collector — Budget Amendment for 2002- 2003. 2) City of Naples - Voluntary Annexation/Ruffina, 605 Sandpiper Street — Antaramian Capital Partners, LLC. AGENDA ITEM No.A— JAN 13 2004 Pg. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MAKE A DETERMINATION OF WHETHER THE PURCHASES OF GOODS AND SERVICES DOCUMENTED IN THE DETAILED REPORT OF OPEN PURCHASE ORDERS SERVE A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF COUNTY FUNDS TO SATISFY SAID PURCHASES. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners make a determination whether the purchase orders opened from December 6, 2003 tluough December 26, 2003 serve a valid public purpose and authorize the expenditure of County funds to satisfy said purchases. CONSIDERATIONS: To ensure compliance with State law, the Clerk's Office has prepared a detail list of all purchase orders that have not previously been approved by the Board of County Commissioners that were opened for the period December 6, 2003 through December 26, 2003. This report is available for inspection and review in the County Manager's Office. FISCAL IMPACT: The goods and services included in the aforementioned report have all been previously appropriated. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT. There is no Growth Management Impact related to this item. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners make a determination of whether the purchases of goods and services documented in the detailed report of open purchase orders serve a valid public purpose and authorize the expenditure of County funds to satisfy said purchases. Prepared By: ,�'� Date: 4 J es L. Mitchell, CIA, CFE, CBA Director of Finance and Accounting Reviewed and L/ Approved By: ftt cf Constance Murray General Operations Manager Date: /(o% 4 AG- ENE✓rfti i TEIM No.-_/,T JAN 13 1 3 2004 Pg. � EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AUTHORIZE THE PAYMENT OF PLANNING FEES IN THE LAWSUIT STYLED COLLIER COUNTY V. GJR OF NAPLES, INC., ET AL., CASE NO. 02- 2212 -CA (IMMOKALEE ROAD PROJECT #60018). OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the payment of planning fees in the amount of $923.39 with respect to Parcel 188 in the lawsuit styled Collier County vs. GJR of Naples, Inc., et al., Case No. 02- 2212 -CA. CONSIDERATIONS: On September 5, 2002, an Order of Taking was entered in Collier County Circuit Court regarding the fee simple acquisition of Parcel 188 for the Immokalee Road project (Project No. 60018). On September 19, 2002, Collier County deposited with the Registry of the Court the sum of $33,000 for Parcel 188 in accordance with the Order of Taking. At its regular Board meeting on September 9, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners authorized the County to make an Offer of Judgment for Parcel 188 to the property owner, GJR of Naples, Inc., in the amount of $40,000 as full compensation for the property taken, including any severance damages, business damages, damages to the remainder, and costs to cure, but does not include attorney's fees or other such costs. On September 22, 2003, the property owner agreed to accept the County's Offer of Judgment. The owner has paid the sum of $923.39 to Morns -DePew & Associates for planning services in connection with the County's taking of Parcel 188. Planning fees are reimbursable costs under Section 73.091, F.S. MISCAL IMPACT: unds in the amount of $923.39 are available in the Transportation Road Construction Gas Tax Fund. Source of Funds are Gas Taxes. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Authorize payment of $923.39 to the Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson Trust Account on behalf of the property owner for planning fees. SUBMITTED BY: Date: 1 1 l -UA � Heidi F. Ashton, Assistant County Attorney REVIEWED BY: Kevin H6nddLks, ROW-Mc-quisition Manager Transportation/ECM/ROW Date: /L - AGEN A ITEM N0. JAN 13 2004 Pg. REVIEWED BY: ZIZ Date: / Gregg Strap Luse, P.E., Director Trans o ' on/E REVIEWED BY: z Date: Norm eder, Administrator Trans ortation Division APPROVED BY: Date: David C. Weigel, Count Attorney AGENDA ITEM N0. I I 2 ,IAN 13 2004 Morris -Oepew Associates, Inc. Final Billing Summary Collier County v. GJR of Naples, Inc. ( Immokalee Rd., Ph. 1, P.188) MDA# 02125 October 2, 2003 Date Staff/Description 10/03/02 S.Hewitt/Engineering/Planning Technician Research property information and production of base map. 10/06/02 S.HewitUEngineering /Planning Technician Research property information and production of base map. 10/07/02 S.Hewitt/Engineering /Planning Technician Research property information and production of base map. 10/16/02 S.Hewitt/Engineering /Planning Technician Production of base map. 10/17/02 S.Hewitt/Engineering/Planning Technician Production of base map. 10/18/02 S. Hewitt/Engineering /Planning Technician Production of base map and assist with preparation of memorandum. 10/21102 S.Hewitt/Engineering /Planning Technician Assist with preparation and distribution of memorandum and plans. 10/21/02 Postage 12/02/02 S.Collette/Director of Planning Research and analysis preparation on Immokalee Road condemnation. 12/05/02 S.Collette/Director of Planning Research and analysis preparation on Immokalee Road condemnation. 12/10/02 D.Depew /Principal Permitting analysis of subject and adjoining properties. 12110/02 S.Collette /Director of Planning Research and analysis preparation on Immokalee Road condemnation. 1 of 2 Rate Hours Ch_ ar-gee J 55.00 55.00 1.50 $82.50 - $123.75 55.00 1.00 $55.00 C: 55.00 1.75 $96.25 01 P-1 55.00 0.50 $27.50 55.00 0.50 $27.50 55.00 1.75 $96.25 55.00 2.25 $123.75 55.00 1.00 $55.00 $1.92 95.00 0.50 $47.50 95.00 0.50 $47.50 135.00 1.33 $179.55 95.00 0.50 $47.50 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1hK 1 JAN 1 11111 Pg. 12/19/02 E.McCartneyMord Processing Operator 35.00 0.25 $8.75 Prepare correspondence regarding the Heritage Bay concept plan. 12/19/02 Postage $1.92 02/03/03 A.Zambrano /Assistant Planner 80.00 1.00 $80.00 Prepare base map. "Total amount invoiced" $923.39 2of2 AGEND ITEM NO. �--- JAN 13 2004 Pg.--�L- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE THE AGREED ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES RELATIVE TO THE EASEMENT ACQUISITIONS OF PARCELS 114,115 AND 116 IN THE LAWSUIT STYLED COLLIER COUNTY V. CENTEX HOMES, ET AL., CASE NO. 02- 1602 -CA (GOODLETTE -FRANK ROAD PROJECT NO. 60134). OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Agreed Order awarding attorney fees with respect to Parcels 114, 115 and 116 in the lawsuit styled Collier County v. Centex Homes, et al., Case No. 02- 1602 -CA (Goodlette -Frank Road Project No. 60134). On July 10, 2002, an Order of Taking was entered in Collier County Circuit Court regarding the acquisition of perpetual, non - exclusive road right of way, drainage and utility easements for the Goodlette -Frank Road 4- Laning Project (Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road). On September 16, 2002, Collier County deposited with the Registry of the Court the sum of $25,700.00 for Parcel Nos. 114, 115 and 116 in accordance with the Order of Taking. On January 16 2003, the Board of County Commissioners approved a Stipulated Final Judgment with the property owner. Michael R. Whitt, Esquire represents two interested parties: Autumn Woods Master Association, Inc. and Autumn Woods Community Association, Inc. To conclude �., this matter, the County has agreed to pay reasonable attorney fees in the amount of $3000.00 to Michael R. Whitt, Esquire pursuant to Section 73.091(1), F.S., with respect to Parcels 114, 115 and 116, the terms of which are set out in the Agreed Order (attached as Exhibit "1 "). Autumn Woods Master Association, Inc. has agreed to convey a temporary driveway restoration easement to Collier County. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $3000.00 are available from the Transportation upported Gas Tax and Impact Fee Funds. Source of funds are Gas Taxes and Impact Fees. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: 1. approve the Agreed Order; 2. approve the expenditure of funds as stated; and 3. accept the temporary driveway restoration easement from Autumn Woods Master Association, Inc. SUBMITTED BY: A,- Date eidi F. Ashton, Assistant County Attorney I Q AGENDA ITEM N0. _ ifoK JAN 13 2004 Pg. 2 REVIEWED BY: REVIEWED BY Tran Greg Strakaluse, P.E., Director Transportation/ECM ;er Date: 12 -5-03 Date: �Z d REVIEWED BY: / ' Aax- Date: Norm eder, Administrator Tran ortation Division _ 4 APPROVED BY: Date: -1t;2 —q---08 a David C. Weigel, County AttorneY AGENDA I EM-, N0. vv�� JAN 13 2004 Pg. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Petitioner, Mm CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada general partnership, et al., Respondents. Case No.: 02- 1602 -CA Parcel Nos.: 114, 115, 116 THIS CAUSE, having come before the Court upon joint motion of the parties, Petitioner, Collier County, and Respondent, Autumn Woods Community Association, Inc., for entry of an Agreed Order, and the Court, being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that upon conveyance of a temporary driveway restoration easement by Autumn Woods Master Association, Inc., to Petitioner, Collier County, for the Red Oak Blvd. Entrance, Petitioner, Collier County, agrees to pay to Respondent, Autumn Woods Community Association, Inc., the sum of THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00 /100 ($3000.00) as reasonable attorney's fees; and it is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Respondent, Autumn Woods Community Association, Inc., consents to said transfer and subordinates its easement interest to Petitioner, Collier County; and it is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Respondent, Autumn Woods Community Association, Inc., represents that Autumn Woods Master Association, Inc., is the owner of the fee simple interest to Red Oak Blvd; and it is further AGENDA ITEM N0. 16 Ir JAN 13 2004 Pg. _ a 0 U ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Respondent, Autumn Woods Community Association, Inc.. asserts no further claims in this action; and it is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that except as set forth herein, no costs or attorney's fees of any kind or nature shall be awarded to either Respondent Autumn Woods Community Association. Inc., or Petitioner, Collier County, with respect to this Action. DONE AND ORDERED this — day of , 2003, in Naples, Collier County, Florida. Copies furnished to all parties on the attached Service List CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE JOINT MOTION The Parties, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby move for entry of the foregoing Agreed Order. Dated: IKIICHA R. WHITT, S1QUIRE Florida Bar o. 072 BECKER & P LIAKOFF, P.A. 3003 Tamiami Trail, N., Suite 210 Naples, FL 34103 (239) 261 -9555 - Telephone (239) 261 -9744 - Facsimile Attorney for Respondent Autumn Woods Community Association, Inc. Dated: HEIDI F. ASHTON, ESQUIRE Ox Florida Bar No. 0966770 COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Harmon Turner Building 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (239) 774 -8400 - Telephone (239) 774 -0225 - Facsimile ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER AGENDA iT$-:IA _.1.�.1�....�_ JAN 13 2004 pg. !f SERVICE LIST Heidi F. Ashton, Esquire Office of the County Attorney Harmon Turner Building 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Michael R. Whitt, Esquire BECKER & POLIAKOFF, P.A. 3303 North Tamiami Trail, Suite 210 Naples, FL 34103 David Smc "-.r, Esquire Bricklemyer Smolker & Bolves, P.A. 500 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 200 Tampa, FL 33602 -4825 Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida c/o Thomas C. Palmer, Esquire Office of the County Attorney Harmon Turner Building 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Comcast Cablevision of the South, Inc. c/o CT Corporation System, Reg. Agent 1200 S. Pine Island Road Plantation, FL 33324 J. Marshall Conrad, Esquire AUSLEY & MCMULLEN P. O. Box 391 Tallahassee, FL 32302 Florida Power & Light Company c/o Jean G. Howard, Esquire P. O. Box 029100 Miami, FL 33102 -9100 Collier County Tax Collector c/o E. Glenn Tucker, Esquire RHODES & TUCKER P. O. Box 887 Marco Island, FL 34146 AGE20-� N0. JAN 13 2004 Pg. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE THE MEDIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND A STIPLATED FINAL JUDGMENT TO BE DRAFTED INCORPORATING THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS THE MEDIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RELATIVE TO THE ACQUISITION OF PARCEL 129 IN THE LAWSUIT STYLED COLLIER COUNTY V. JAMES R. COLOSIMO, TRUSTEE, ET AL., CASE NO. 00- 0138 -CA (PINE RIDGE ROAD PROJECT NO. 60111). OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Mediated Settlement Agreement and a Stipulated Final Judgment to be drafted incorporating the same terms and conditions as the Mediated Settlement Agreement as full and final compensation to be paid for the acquisition of Parcel 129 for the Pine Ridge Road Project (6 -Lane Improvements from Airport Road to Logan Boulevard) in the lawsuit styled Collier County v. James R. Colosimo, Trustee., et al., Case No. 00- 0138 -CA. CONSIDERATIONS: On April 6, 2000, an Order of Taking was entered in Collier County Circuit Court regarding the acquisition of fee simple easements for the Pine Ridge Road Project No. 60111. On April 27, 2000, Collier County deposited with the Registry of the Court the sum of $63,700.00 for Parcel 129 in accordance with the Order of Taking. The County's written offer dated July 21, 1999 was $42,500.00 A Mediation Conference was held on December 9, 2003 in which the parties reached a settlement agreement whereby the property owners will be fully and fairly compensated for the property interests taken for the public purposes enumerated in the resolution of condemnation (Resolution No. 99 -228). The terms of the Mediated Settlement Agreement (attached as Exhibit "A ") will be incorporated in the Stipulated Final Judgment to be presented to the Court for entry. The Mediated Settlement Agreement provides for $112,000.00 to be paid to Respondents in full settlement of all claims for compensation including statutory interest, but excluding attorney's fees, experts' fees and costs. Statutory attorney's fees are $22,935.00 The Mediated Settlement Agreement requires Collier County to pay an additional amount of $48,300.00 equaling the balance of full compensation. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $48,300.00 are available from the Transportation Supported Gas Tax and Impact Fee Funds. Source of funds are Gas Taxes and Impact Fees. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: 1. approve the expenditure of funds as stated; 2. approve the Mediated Settlement Agreement; and �~ AGENDA ITEM N0. _l k If JAN 1 3 2003 Pg, 3. approve the Stipulated Final Judgment which incorporates the terms and conditions of the Mediated Settlement Agreement to be presented to the Court for entry. SUBMITTED BY: r �--- Date: i 2 % 1(� 0 Heidi . As n, Assistan n Attorney REVIEWED BY. Date: evi en cks, ROW uisition Manager Transpo ation/ECM/ROW REVIEWED BY: Date: Gregg Strakaluse, P.E., Director Transportation/ECM REVIEWED BY: / Date: /Z/03 Norm eder, Administrator Transliortation Division APPROVED BY: -, 4 Date: 6ca7- David C. Weigel, County orney AGENDA ITEM. NO. jh f r- JAN 13 2003 V!, --- COPY MEMORANDUM TO: David Weigel County Attorney FROM: Robert H. Abreu 1l ' Sr. Contract Consultant RE: Explanatory Settlement Memorandum Explanatory Memorandum December 23, 2003 Pursuant to your request attached please find my "Explanatory Memorandum" concerning the Collier County v. James R. Colosino mediated settlement of Civil Action No. 00 -138, Parcel No. 129. Facts You will recall that on or about April 2000 Collier County acquired 7083 square feet (a 20' take) from the parent track on Parcel No. 129, utilizing "Eminent Domain" procedures. Prior to the taking the County's last offer was for $42,500.00 (July 21, 1999). The offer was rejected. As a result, the above civil action was initiated leading up to the mediated settlement on December 9, 2003, for $112,000.00. By correspondence dated September 23, 2003, the County Attorney's Office received an offer to settle this matter from Defendant's counsel. They indicated that they would accept $413,540.00 in full compensation for the property taken and severance damages, but excluding fees and costs. They indicated that the severance damages of $196,00.00 and a large portion of the cost to cure damages of $65,340.00 could be eliminated, leaving a full compensation figure of $152,200.00. Mediation On December 9, 2003, Defendant's counsel claimed that the Amerada Hess Corporation had contracted with his client to purchase a portion of the subject property (March 1, 1999) [for $115 LF, for an estimated total price of $1,109,330.001. They represented that the deal fell through because of the County's take. An allegation we vehemently disputed. Notwithstanding this, they also claimed that the property in question has lost its commercial value due to the take. As a result they cannot build a gas station, a Hotel, a restaurant and/or medical office building. We disputed this claim also. Defendant's counsel has not had an appraisal done on the subject property claiming that his client could not afford it. However, he does claim to have hired an engineer to prepare costs estimates. Defendant did not provide expert testimony during the mediation, on December 9, 2003. AGENDA ITS E- No. —J 3 JAN 13 2003 pg. 3 Prior to the December 9, 2003 mediation, I spoke with our appraiser and was told that he had appraised subject property too low and would have to update his appraisal prior to any litigation in this matter. He indicated that his updated appraisal could be as high as $13.00 per square foot ($92,079.00). This amount does not reflect any damage assessments. At the time of mediation we were of the opinion that Defendant's claims were, at most, speculative and lacking supporting documentation. Offers of Settlement During Mediation Process 1. The County's initial offer was $63,700.00. Defendant countered with $413,000.00 plus $15,300.00 for their damage claim and $200,000.00 Severance damages because of the loss of parking and disproportionate impact. 2. The County's next offer was for $79,000.00 (no damages). Defendant countered with $213,000.00 plus $15,300.00 and raised issues pertaining to water quality within the drainage basin (see Exhibit B of Settlement). Exhibit agreed to by County representatives (Gregg Strakaluse, Director TECM, Robert H. Abreu, Sr. Contract Consultant and Joe Fixel, Esquire, County designated attorney in this matter). 3. The County next offered $86,300.00 (breakdown: $71,000.00 plus $15,300.00 damage claim). Defendant dropped his severance damage claim as a result of negotiations and countered with $150,00.00 plus $15,300.00 damages. 4. The County next offered $107,400.00, "take it or leave it," final offer. The defendant countered with $116,200.00, which we rejected outright. 5. As a compromise, the County and Defendant agreed to $112,000.00 in full settlement of all claims for compensation from Defendant, including statutory interests, but excluding attorney's fees, experts' fees, and costs. Defendant is entitled to a credit of $63,700.00, which was previously deposited. Balance due Defendant is $48,300.00 (payable within 30 days of actual receipt of counsel's conformed copy of the stipulated final judgment or as soon as practical hereafter. Note also "Exhibit A" of Settlement, where the parties agreed that the settlement is based on the assumption that the taking of the R/W parcel 4129 on the Pine Ridge Road Project, in and of itself has not and will not invalidate nor require an amendment to the existing PUD Ordinance No. 98 -61. Parties 1. Defendants, Defendant Counsel Thomas R. Bolf 2. County: Joseph Fixel, Esquire (of Counsel), Robert H. Abreu, TECM, Gregg Strakaluse, TECM, Appraiser, and George Archibald, Expert 3. Mediator: Peter D. Waldman, Esquire NOTE: Robert H. Abreu bad been given Settlement authority, up to $115,000.00 CC: Gregg StrAaluse, Director, TECM Heidi Ashton, Assistant County Attorney AGEN A ITENL, N0. J JAN 13 2003 pg. -- f% IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL. CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the state of Florida, Petitioner, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 00-01' )8 CA PARCEL NO.: 129 vs. JAMES R. COLOSINO, TRUSTEE under Unrecorded Land Trust Agreement dated 12/10/92, et al., Respondents. MEDLATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT At the Mediation Conference held on December 9. 2003, the parties reached the following Settlement Agreement: 1. _ Petitioner will ay to Respondent(s) Fa rr? X F the sum of X11 --t in full�se= ttTlement of all claims for compensation from Petitioner whatsoever, including statutory interest, but excluding attorney's fees, experts' fees, and costs. Said sum shall be subject to claims for apportionment, if any. 2. Petitioner is entitled to a credit in the amount of �� which was previously deposited in the Registry of the Court in this case by Petitioner. 3. Counsel for Petitioner and Respondent(s) will jointly submit to the Court for signature a mutually approved Stipulated Final Judgment in this matter as soon as practical hereafter. 4. Petitioner will pay Respondent(s) the balance due of ( 0-D within _ days of the actual date of receipt by the Petitioner's counsel of a conformed copy of the aforesaid Stipulated Final Judgment in this matter as soon as practical hereafter. 5. The Court will retain jurisdiction herein as to the matter of Respondent(s) attorneys' fees, expert fees, and costs. 6. Attached hereto is an addendum to this Agreement. Yes No AGENDA ITEM- - JAN 13 2003 Pg. This Agreement and the attached addendum, if any, contain(s) all of the agreements of the parties. Petitioner �= J� �E'� / / f 8 ' y Respo scent y oe�pondent 1 Respondent Respondent Respondent Attorney for Respondent AGENDA ITEM N0. lb IC 3 JAN 13 2003 Pg. ADDENDUM TO MEDIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT /� This settlement Lisfmade subject to the following additional items. /`F C t'�;7 - iT4�'T' i---111 ti �i F I 11r-5 1 ��%�� '�� ':� Q d•F �'� � �7lj �I1.t' r �4 Cal �'� �S; �� it P�il�' 1, �,� t� //Q LA� t` Petitioner— v [3f: fZvb -erT H• f _P4Ztt • lip j Attorney for Respondent AGENDA ITEM NO. 1bK JAN 13 2003 pg. f W,-, t'�U�� i �';;u . 12, l , ►� n� . I 11r-5 1 ��%�� '�� ':� Q d•F �'� � �7lj �I1.t' r �4 Cal �'� �S; �� it P�il�' 1, �,� t� //Q LA� t` Petitioner— v [3f: fZvb -erT H• f _P4Ztt • lip j Attorney for Respondent AGENDA ITEM NO. 1bK JAN 13 2003 pg. This settlement is based on the assumption that the taking of the R/W parcel #129 on the Pine Ridge Road Project in of itself has not and will not invalidate nor require an amendment to the existing PUD Ordinance No. 98 -61. � IN I-f l� AGENDA IT!!Z N0. JAN 13 2003 pg.s This settlement is based on the assumption that surplus water quality retention is and will continue to be, available to the property owner within the drainage basin in a capacity amount adequate to offset any reduction in the capacity amount for water quality retention which would be eliminated as a result of the construction of a potential westbound right turn lane to service the subject parcel at the access location the County ultimately approves. As to whether this surplus water quality retention area has been available to the property owner, this will, if necessary, be determined by the Court, and parties reserve their right thereto. CX4 ;G;f A AGEN ITE 0. M N JAN 13 2003 pg. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PETITION RZ- 2003 -AR -4080, HIBISCUS CHURCH, REQUESTING A REZONE FROM "GC" GOLF COURSE TO "CF" COMMUNITY FACILITY FOR A CHURCH FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD AND DORAL CIRCLE, IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. OBJECTIVE: The petitioner requests to rezone 4.06 acres from the "GC" Golf Course zoning district to the "CF" Community Facility zoning district to allow the development of a 513 -seat church along with code required parking of 214 spaces. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is located at the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Doral Circle, legally described as (See Exhibit "A "). The property belongs to Lennar Partners, Inc., which currently owns the Hibiscus Golf Course that is located to the south across a canal. This property is surplus to the golf course and therefore the petitioner is proposing to rezone this property for a church with a maximum of 513 seats, and the required 214 parking spaces along with the normal accessory uses that are necessary to support the church. Because the property is owned by the golf course, they have committed to share their parking area as overflow parking for the church. Access will be shared with the golf course. The Collier County Planning Commission reviewed this petition on December 4, 2003 and unanimously recommended approval of the petition subject to conditions (See Exhibit "B "). FISCAL IMPACT• Approval of this petition would have no fiscal impact on the County. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of this conditional use will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth Management Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: The Environmental Review Staff has reviewed this petition and has recommended approval subject to stipulations that have been incorporated into the Resolution. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Hibiscus Church RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 .r30 D. �.� JAN 13 2004 P1. HISTORICAL /ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: Staff's analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is not located within an Area of Historical and Archaeological Probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no survey or waiver of Historic and Archaeological Survey & Assessment is required. DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditions to be attached to any approval for this petition. The conditions are listed below: a) Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if, during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity an historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. b) Access to the site shall not be allowed from Doral Circle. c) A Type D buffer will be placed along the eastern boundary of the site to protect the single- family neighborhood to the east. d) No day care operation is permitted on this site. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Collier County Planning Commission heard this petition at the December 4, 2003, CCPC meeting. The motion passed unanimously. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Hibiscus Church RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 JAN 13 2004 Pg. A PREPARED BY: � aR, ROBIN D. M PRINC AL PLANNER DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEWED BY: �z- 2`i 03 AY BELLOWS, CHIEF PLANN R DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEWED BY: I V7 v USAN MURRAY, AICP, INTERIM IARECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY X02 0 r . H ITT, MINISTRATOR DATE ITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL S DIVISION executive summary/Hibiscus Church/ RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 AGENDA ITEM No. � EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Hibiscus Church RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 JAN 1 3 `034 P9. 3 Co*er County STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEPARTMENT OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 4, 2003 SUBJECT: PETITION: RZ- 2003 -AR -4080, HIBISCUS CHURCH REZONE OWNER/AGENT: Agent: Jeremy Sterk Hoover Planning & Development, Inc. 3785 Airport Road North, Suite B -1 Naples, Florida 34105 Owner: Lennar Partners, Inc. 1601 Washington Ave. #700 Miami, Florida 33139 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner wishes to rezone 4.06 -acres from the "GC" Golf Course zoning district to the "CF" Community Facility zoning district to allow the development of a 513 -seat church along with code required parking of 214 spaces. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The property is located on the SE corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Doral Circle (see illustration on following map page) in Section 19, Township 50, Range 26 East. File RZ- 2003 -AR -14080 AGENDA n-EM t4M JAN 13 2004 Pt. r O n D O iZ D -v m 0 z N N O O W D A A O O v rn D -v RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 AGENDA JAN 13 2004 i e fill 3 fig} is 1 N ��yi SM0,113a Ai'H £0 /O I/L :glv(l 8900ZOZOOZ# 133rouj 09017-uv-£OOZ-Z?I RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 3 Z I Z2� I iZ-_1 R JAN 13 2004 PQ. L _ a s S'i tc> _ LMr - ;,� -•tea: �-` `'; � � -I�: �- �,+ J,. � AA '' Ae WAr o PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is proposing to rezone this property for a church with a maximum of 513 seats, and the required 214 parking spaces along with the normal accessory uses that are necessary to support the church. Because the property is owned by the golf course, they have committed to share their parking area as overflow parking for the church. Access will be from Doral Circle and from the current access for the golf course. The property is adjacent to the south side of Rattlesnake Hanunock Road and borders a single - family neighborhood on the east made up of 82 lots. On the west is a parking area for the golf course. To the west of the golf course parking is property zoned RMF -16 for the Country Club Manor Condominium property. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Subject Parcel: The site is undeveloped; zoned "GC" Golf Course. Surrounding: North: Rattlesnake Hammock Road/Riviera Colony Mobile Home Park zoned Mobile Home/Bank & retail center zoned C -3 Commercial. East: Golf Course Parking zoned "GC" Golf Course/ Country Club Manor Condominiums are zoned RMF -16. South: Hibiscus Golf Course (Clubhouse & Golf Course) is zoned "GC" Golf Course. West: Doral Circle / Single - family Homes zoned RSF -3. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: The subject property is designated Urban (Urban - Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Sub district), as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. Relevant to this petition, the Urban designation permits non - residential uses including community facilities such as churches, group housing, cemeteries, schools and school facilities co- located with other public facilities such as parks, libraries, and community centers, where feasible and mutually acceptable. Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes the proposed use for the subject site can be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. ANALYSIS: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Environmental Advisory Council did not hear this petition because an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was not required. An EIS was not required because the property does not meet the size th h ld res o RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 5 AGENDA ITEM Na� JAN 13 2004 PLANNING ANALYSIS: The subject property is designated Urban (Urban — Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Sub district), as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan and is therefore eligible of rezone from Golf Course to Community Facility The CF District is intended to implement the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan by permitting nonresidential land uses as generally identified in the urban designation of he Future Land Use Element. A church is a listed permitted use within the CF district. As stated in the Growth Management Plan analysis, this property lies within the Urban designation of the County. The property is also located on an arterial street and as such is a good location for a use such as a church. TRANSPORTATION REVIEW: Development review for Transportation Engineering has not placed any requirements on this project at the time of the drafting of this staff report. UTILITIES REVIEW_ The proposed impact of this rezone on infrastructure was reviewed by the applicable reviewing agencies and their comments have been incorporated into this Staff Report. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING: The petitioner held a Neighborhood Information Meeting on August 6, 2003, that was attended by approximately 25 individuals. At the public meeting for this rezone the residents attending expressed concerns with the traffic situation on Rattlesnake Hammock Road. According to residents, on Sundays, excess traffic from St. Peter's Catholic Church which is to the east of the subject site on the north side of the road causes traffic to back up on Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. They also asked staff to review the possibility of restricting the church to accessing their site only from the shared access with the golf course to reduce impacts on the single - family homes west of Doral Circle. PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed rezone to CF is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code as demonstrated in Attachment A, of this report. Therefore, the Department of Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. JAN 13 2004 RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 6 Pa.�_ PREPARED BY: ff liq ROBN MEYER, PRINC A PLANNER DATE' DEPARTMENT OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEWED BY• I I cr o3 RAY BULLOWS, CHIEF PLANNER DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 4 L= I i Lb; SUS MURRAY AICP, INTERIM DIRECTOR D TE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW K. SCHMITT, ADMINISTRATOR IYATt NITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION ition RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 Tentatively scheduled for the January 13, 2004 Board of County Commissioners Meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: pili �6j RUSSEL A. BUDD, CHAIRMAN AGENDA ITEM NO.--12 EA JAN 13 2004 Pa.--LL- !, 0-11, APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: STANDARD REZON. Date Petition Received: _ RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 Petition No.: PROJECT 42002020068 Planner Assigned: DATE: 5/14/03 Commission District: RAY BELLOWS ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF I General Information: Name of Applicant(s) Lennar Partners, Inc. Applicant's Mailing Address 1601 Washington Ave. #700 City Miami Beach Applicant's E -Mail Address: none Applicant's Telephone # 305 -6 95-5360 State FL Zip 33139 Fax 4 305 -695 -5379 Name of Agent Jeremy Sterk FirmHoover Planning & Development, Inc_ Agent's Mailing Address3785 Airport Road North, Suite B -1 State FL — Zip 34105 City Naples Agent's Telephone # 239 -403 -8899 Fax 9239 -4__. 03-9009 Agent's E -Mail Address: jeremy hooverplanning.com COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN O 2800 H RSESHOE DRIVE - NAPLES, FL 34104 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 0212000 Complete the following for all Association(s) affiliated with this petition. (Provide additional sheets if necessary) Name of Homeowner Association: Mr. Arthur Fay, Golf View Manor 11 Association Mailing Address 5651 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. 4108C _ City Naples State FL_ Zip34113 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address Name of Master Association: Mr. Dean Corrow, Lela Mailing Address 137 St. Andrews Blvd. City City Civic Association State Zip State City Naples State FL Zip 34113 Name of Civic Association: Mr. Ken Drum, East Naples Civic Association Mailing Address 8404 Mallow Lane City Naples State FL Zip 34113 2. Disclosure of Interest information: a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with art ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership —AGES W Il APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 02/2002 JAN 13 2004 Pg._ �� b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address, and Office Wells Fargo Bank of Minnesota c/o Lennar Partners, Inc., P.A. Attn: Pat Prince 760 N W 107th Ave. #400 Miami, FL 33172 -3157 Percentage of Stock Public Corporation C- If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Percentage of Interest Name and Address d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Percentage of Ownership Name and Address e, If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, he names ofithe contractdpu chasers Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of ownership Date of Contract: APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 0212002 JAN 13 2004 pg._1, f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address g. Date subject property, acquired ® leased ❑ 10 -27 -oo Term of lease yrs. /mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option terminates: or anticipated closing date — and date option h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. ;. _Detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page.) If request Involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1 " to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre - application meeting. NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or scaled survey may be required. Section: 19 Township: 50S Range: 26E Lot: Block: Subdivision: — Plat Book__,__ Page #_ Property LD. #: Metes & Bounds Description: I See attached legal Description___ 4 Size of property: 299.50 ft. X 590.50 ft. - Total Sq. Ft. 176,855 Acres-4.06 5. Address /general location of subject property: SE corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Dora] Circle. AGENDA 6. Adiacent zoning and land use: —1 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE _-02/2002 JAN 13 2004 Zoning Tl Road ROW/MH/C -3 S GC E GC /RMF -16 W Road ROW/RSF -3 Land use Rattlesnake Hammock Road /Riviera Colony M.H. Park/Bank & Retail Center Hibiscus Golf Course (Clubhouse & Golf Course) Golf Course Parking /Country Club Manor Condominiums Doral Circle / Single Family Homes Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject property? If so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page). yes Section: 0 Township: 50 So uth _ Range: 26 East Lot: ______ Block: Subdivision: Lely Golf Estates O.R.2738 Page #- 1702 Property I.D. #: 55150120005, 55150040004 Metes & Bounds Description: Shown on OR 2738 Page 1703 less subject property proposed to be off. . Rezone Request: This application is requesting a rezone from the GC (Golf Course) 7 zoning district (s) to the CF (Community Facility) zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Vacant Land. Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: The proposed use is a church with a maximum of 513 seats. g. Evaluation Criteria: Pursuant to Section 2endat on t the Planning Commission, Development Code, staff s analysis and recomm and the Planning Commission's recommendation Br�ria noted below. Providera of County shall be based upon consideration of the applicable cte narrative statement describing the rezone request with ospecific n support of the requestrla noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation Standard Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 2.7.2.E No.--L APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 02/2002 JAN 13 2004 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the growth. management plan. 2. The existing land use pattern. 3. The possible creation, of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment (rezone) necessary. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. 9. Whether the proposed change -will seriously reduce light and air to ac(jacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in, districts already permitting such use. 16 The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE -02/2002 WJ JAN 13 2004 Pa. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and growth services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County management plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. H], as amended. 18. Such other factors, standardsrof the public health, safely, and welfareers shall deem important in the protection g_ Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded ou may wish to contact the however, many communities have adopted such civic or property owners association in the area fo which eingrirequested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected y existing deed ]p. Previous land use petitions on the su b iect pro e : To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? if so, what was the nature of that hearing? 11. Additional Submittal requirements: in addition to nhto be deemed application, the unless s completed following shall be submitted in order for your applicat otherwise waived during the pre - application meeting. a. A copy of the pre - application meeting notes; b. if this rezone is being requested for a specific use, provide fifteen (15) copies of a 24" x 36" conceptual site plan (16 copies if for affordable housing) [and one reduced 8 1/2" x 11 copy of site plan], drawn to a maximum scale of 1 inch equals 400 feet, depicting the following [Additional copies the an may be requestadvupon completion of staff evaluation for distribution or CCPCJ; boards such as the Environmental Advisory Board (EAB), - -all existing and proposed structures and the dimensions thereof, -- provisions for existing and /or proposed ingress and egress *(including pedestrian ingress and egress to the site and the structure(s) on site), all existing and/or proposed parking and loading s [include matrix indicating -- required and provided parking and loading, including parking for the disabled], -- required yards, open space and preserve areas, -- proposed locations for utilities (as well as location of existing utility services to the site), -- proposed and /or existing landscaping and buffering as may be required by the County, c. An architectural rendering of any proposed structures. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as required by Section n 3.8• of the Code (LDC) , or a request for waiver If appropriate. :77EP 11 APPL(C_ATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 02/2002 I JAN 13 2004 Pg• e. Whether or not an EIS is required, two copies of a recent aerial photograph, (taken within the previous twelve months), minimum scale of one inch equals 400 feet, shall be submitted. Said aerial shall identify plant and /or wildlife habitats and their boundaries, Such identification shall be consistent with Florida Department of Transportation Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System. Additionally, a calculation of the acreage (or square feet) of native vegetation on site, by area, and a calculation and location(s) of the required portion of native vegetation to be preserved (per LDC Section 3.9.5.5.4.). f _ Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments and sketches); g. A Traffic Impact Statement (TIS), unless waived at the pre - application meeting; h. A historical and archeological survey or waiver application if property is located within an area of historical or archaeological probability (as identified at pre- application meeting); i. Any additional requirements as may be applicable to specific conditional uses and identified during the pre - application meeting, including but not limited to any required state or federal permits. AiGENDA ITEM No. JAN 13 2004 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 02/2002 1 HOOVER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, INC. plANN1NG Rezonings, PUDs, Conditional Uses, Variances, Plan Amendments, Traffic, Parking, & Land Use Studies, Site Planning & Subdivisions April 16, 2003 RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 Mr. Ray Bellows PROJECT #2002020068 Current Planning DATE: 5/14/03 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive RAY BELLOWS Naples, FL 34104 RE: Submittal of Hibiscus Church Rezoning Dear Mr. Bellows: The subject property is 4.06 acrifs in size and is located at the southeast comer of intersection between Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Doral Circle. The subject property was previously cleared and partially being utilized as access drives for the Hibiscus Golf Course Clubhouse, thaw- is located across the canal to the southeast. The access drives for the golf course facilities would remain open so they can be utilized by both the church and the golf course facilities. The subject land is currently excess to the golf course facilities and sufficient parking areas have been set aside to the east of the subject land to meet the parking requirements of the Hibiscus Golf Course facilities (see parking calculations on the attached Preliminary Site Plan). Some of the water management for the church will be provided for off -site via a proposed water management easement. The additional water management area would be located east of the church and on the northern and eastern sides of the golf course parking area. The church is proposed for a maximum of 513 seats in the sanctuary. If you need any additional information feel welcome to contact us. Sincerely, HOOVER PLANNING & DEV., INC. J emy Ster Hp File #302narrl.ltr RECEIVED APR 17 2003 A{JtJVUA 1 f r-M NO. JAN 13 23Jb P9 —-- 3785 Airport Road North, Suite B -1, Naples, Florida 34105 - Phone: 239- 403 -8899 - Fax. 239 - 403 -9009 Apr 14 03 11:39a Charles Uebantl JOl- OJU -J-r // Apr 14 03 1 1 : U4a ^�Jr AFFIDAVIT W C/1 — p, �,r being first duly sworn, depose and say that we/] amlare the owners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief we/1 understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owner We/Ifurther authorize Davidson Engineering, Inc _ to act as ourimy representative in any matters regarding this Petition. L�•�n� Pfbex�oes, u`C. *natu e o PProperty Owner Signature of Property Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of r 1-- 200 -5 by I)S�V � �� 8 "C-+U who is personally knoirn to me or has produced as identification. 0*-�� State of Florida (Signature ofNWrary Public - State of County of Collier Florida) (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) r CAROL J.ABELLEIRA �. Notary Public - State of Florida MyCormMw E*VesSeP 18, 2006 Commission 1t DD 150949 �.. Bonded By National Notary Assn. APPUCATION FOR PUBLIC REARING FOR STANDARD REZONE - 032912003 No. —'— RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 JAN 1--3-noi PROJECT #2002020068 �� DATE: 5114103 pg-- =�-._.. RAY BELLOWS r Hibiscus Cburch Rezoning Evaluation Criteria Whether the proposed change will be consistent s t the gals, manages, andan. policies and future land use map and the elements � he Mixed Use District on the The property is within the Urban Residential Subdistrict Future Land Use Map which permits churches. 2. The existing land use pattern. land use pattern, which is a The proposed land use should have minimal impact on the net 8 hboring r acre, and mobile homes), mixture of residential uses (single-family, the existing golcondominiums o rse facilities e � and south. commercial uses to the northeast, 3. The possible creation, of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. p y low to medium intensity The proposed church is a land use that is corn atible with nearly any land use. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. Not applicable. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment (rezone) necessary. The land has become excess to the golf course facilities. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. se will not adversely affect living cob rs. ns in the neighborhood as small The proposed u churches have a reputation of being very good neigh 7. Whether the proposed change will create atible with surrouincrease iuling land traffic scbe�ause of or create types of traffic deemed incompatible peak volumes or projected development, vehicular or otherwise affect affen� publ ty safety. construction phases of the The proposed use will have less traffic generation than PM PealcnHoursgolf as churchesfacilities generate were constructed on the site during the Weekday AM minimal traffic except on Sundays. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. AGENDA ntM na ement s stem will mitigate all impervious areas that e NM The proposed water ma g Y JAN 1 3 2004 constructed. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent ar -- The proposed church on the site plan demonstrates that this will not be SUBMITTA RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 PROJECT #2002020068 DATE: 7/10/03 RAY BELLOWS 10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed use should have no negative affect on property values in the neighborhood. New church facilities in this "older" neighborhood may have a positive affect on neighboring property values. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed use will not be a deterrent to the improvement of the neighborhood.. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed use will not constitute a special privilege as churches are allowed either as permitted uses or conditional uses on the residential and commercial zoning districts in this neighborhood. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject site is excess to the existing golf course facilities. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed small church facilities will not be out of scale with the neighborhood. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in, districts already permitting such use. It has been very difficult for churches to find suitable properties in the Naples area over the last few years. 16 The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The impacts from the proposed site improvements have been minimized as a courtyard area has been located in the area where 5 mature oak trees exist. This will allow these 5 quality trees to be retained. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County growth management plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. 11], as amended There will be adequate public facilities to service the proposed land use. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safely, and welfare_ The proposed church should have a positive impact on this neighborhood. JAN 13 2004 PQ. 62oZ SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED This Special Warranty Deed made and executed the 2l�—' day of October, 2000, by KOLLSTAR HIBISCUS GOLF CLUB LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having its principal place of business at c/o Koll Resorts International, 4343 Von 1:arman FARGO BANK Beach, California 92660, (hereinafter called the Grantor"). to WELLS MINNESOTA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a National Banking Association, formerly known as Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee under That certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 11, 1998, by and among Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp. ("Depositor") and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Associatiou, among others (for Depositor's Commercial Mortgage Pass - Through Certirkztes, Series whose Tax Identification No. is 52- 2135424, whose address is c/o Lennar Partners, Inc., Attn: Ms. Pat Prince, (CSFB- 98FL -2), Suite 400,760 N.W. ) 07 Avenue, Miami, FL, 33172, (hereinafter called the "Grantee"): ( :t nenever used herein the terms *'Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations). Witnesseth: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the Grantee, all that certain land situate in Colli County, Florida, viz: SEE EXHIBIT A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Property"). Property Tax I.D. No. 55150040004: 55150120005• and 55150480004 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. AGENDA ITEPA 2162. VZ:177752 i JAN 13 2004 vg. 2708326 OR: 2738 PG: 1702 RECORDED it OPPICIAL P.ECDRDS of COLLIER CODRTi. P: 11101/20oo at 12:29PN DWIGHT I. 9ROCE, CLIHL COBS 6402215.02 RIC PIS 24.00 THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY: Doc -.74 44811.10 and after recording return to: Beta: KOZIAK TROPIH IT AL Laurel M. Isicoff, Esq. 200 SOUTH EISCAIKB BLVD S 2O 00 Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton MANI PL 3314 2335 First Union Financial Center 200 South Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2800 Miami, Florida 33131 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED This Special Warranty Deed made and executed the 2l�—' day of October, 2000, by KOLLSTAR HIBISCUS GOLF CLUB LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having its principal place of business at c/o Koll Resorts International, 4343 Von 1:arman FARGO BANK Beach, California 92660, (hereinafter called the Grantor"). to WELLS MINNESOTA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a National Banking Association, formerly known as Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee under That certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 11, 1998, by and among Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp. ("Depositor") and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Associatiou, among others (for Depositor's Commercial Mortgage Pass - Through Certirkztes, Series whose Tax Identification No. is 52- 2135424, whose address is c/o Lennar Partners, Inc., Attn: Ms. Pat Prince, (CSFB- 98FL -2), Suite 400,760 N.W. ) 07 Avenue, Miami, FL, 33172, (hereinafter called the "Grantee"): ( :t nenever used herein the terms *'Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations). Witnesseth: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the Grantee, all that certain land situate in Colli County, Florida, viz: SEE EXHIBIT A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Property"). Property Tax I.D. No. 55150040004: 55150120005• and 55150480004 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. AGENDA ITEPA 2162. VZ:177752 i JAN 13 2004 vg. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. THIS DEED IS AN ABSOLUTE CONVEYANCE AND IS NOT GIVEN OR INTENDED AS SECURITY OR ADDITIONAL SECURITY OR COLLATERAL OF ANY KIND WHATSOEVER. IT IS THE EXPRESS INTENT OF BOTH THE GRANTOR AND THE GRANTEE HEREIN THAT THE LEGAL ESTATE ACQUIRED BY THE GRANTEE PURSUANT TO THE CONVEYANCE BY THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED SHALL NOT BE MERGED WITH THE EQUITABLE ESTATE IN, OR THE LIEN ENCUMBERING, THE SUBJECT' PROPERTY OWNED BY THE GRANTEE HEREIN BY VIRTUE OF (A) THAT MORTGAGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT DATED AS OF JULY 21, 1998, RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2444, PAGE 3303. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS THE SAME WAS ASSIGNED BY THAT CERTAIN ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 23,1998 RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 25,,2 , PAGE 2419, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND (B) THAT SECOND MORTGAGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT DATED AS OF JULY 21,1 998, RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2444. PAGE M, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF C a, 1� ER COUNTY. FLORIDA AS THE SAME WAS ASSIGNED BY THAT CEE AIN ASSIGNMENT OF SECOND MORTGAGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT DATED AS OF NOVEMBER23,1998 RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2614 PAGE ]Z . OF THE PUBLIC, RECORDS OF COLLIE9 COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE GRANTEE HEREIN SHALL TAKE THE PROPERTY CONVEYED HEREBY SUBJECT TO SAID MORTGAGES. 0 And the Grantor hereby covenants with the Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said r", land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims k-> of all persons claiming under and through the Grantor but against no others. O > -a ]No Further Text on this Page] - 0 JAN 13 2004 OR: 2738 PG: 1704 In Witness Whereof the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of (Signature) (Printed Name) c (Ut�U_4 4ig nnl u r e) (Printed Name) ( Witnesses) STATE OF N i t, �j o' K ) COUNTY OF r,(cl ; 4r'i k ) KoUstar Hibiscus Goff Club LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Kollstar Golf LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its sole managing member By: Kollstar Golf Corp., a Delaware corporation, its sole managing member (seal) BY Name: Peter AM Title: Vice- President and Secretary The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 11� day of October, 2000 by Peter Ahl, Vice- President and Secretary of Kollstar Golf Corp., a Delaware corporation, as sole managing member of Kollstar Golf LLC, a Delaware limited liability company as managing member of Kollstar Hibiscus Golf Club LLC, a Dew r1111-C e I mi amiability company, on its behalf. He is personally known to me or has produced c i:,st, as identification. -1Lj G. a, _ NOTARY PUBLI IJIVATE OF Nj W k AT LARGE Print Name: PAMELA ,k My Commission Expires: Mckry "K• Sur., ` No. O)JU6f34et,' Commission No: � n Dochese ad in Now Y(o k iOA 84*ft Amg W 1 AGENDA ITEM No. JAN 13 2004 Pg. 01. STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR STANDARD REZONE REQUEST 1. NAME OF APPLICANT: Lennar Partners, Inc. 2 MAILING ADDRESS: 1601 Washington Avenue, #700 CITY Miami STATE FL ZIP 33139 3 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): 175 Dora] Circle, Hibiscus Club 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION - Section: 19 Township: 50S Range: 26E Lot- Block: Subdivision: Plat Book Page #: Property I.D. #: Metes & Bounds Description: See attached legal Description. 5 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED (Check applicable system): a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM PROVIDE NAME d. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT ❑ (GPD capacity) _ e. SEPTIC SYSTEM ❑ 6. TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED: a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM PROVIDE NAME d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL) APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE -03- 213 -2003 ❑ No, ❑ JAN 13 2�!1 RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 PROJECT #2002020068 DATE: 5/14/03 RAY BELLOWS TOTAL POPULATION TO BE SERVED: 513 PEAK AND AVERAGE DAILY DEMANDS: A. WATER -PEAK 4.28 GPM AVERAGE DAILY 1,539 GPD B. SEWER -PEAK 4.28 GPM AVERAGE DAILY 1,539 GPD IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED: 06 -04 10. NARRATIVE STATEMENT: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. 11. COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: If the project is located within the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. if applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. 12. STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY CAPACITY FROM OTHER PROVIDERS: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre - application meeting, if the project is to receive sever or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. Utility Provision Statement RJM 10/17/97 AGENDA ETE NO JAN 13 2004 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR STANDARD REZONE -03 -28 -2003 I P9 Traffic Impact Study Supplement To April 12, 2003 TIS Hibiscus Church JAN 13 234 RE-SUB NiTT P. A RZ- 2003 -AR -4080 PROJECT #2002020068 DATE: 7/10/03 RAY BELLOWS L I 0 � v � v o� o L 0 ,cl, O k� �\o k� c� 00 �r\r) O �n ssOOd 0/3-) . /D I,v -JU U U oo O C) C Q� �cr- Q� U Q O Q) � N N SSaO V �SOJ U -4, Z U a/OJ!j IOJO NX JAN 13 2004 f 1-10 i v 0 U oo O C) C Q� �cr- Q� U Q O Q) � N N SSaO V �SOJ U -4, Z U a/OJ!j IOJO NX JAN 13 2004 f 1-10 U O O a- Q : ^co O � � O O N N SSOo d �Soj U JAN 13 2004 Pa. 31 42� Q� Q� N N SSOo d �Soj U JAN 13 2004 Pa. 31 ORDINANCE NO. 03 — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91— 102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 0619N BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RATTLESNAKE- HAMMOCK ROAD AND DORAL CIRCLE IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM "GC" GOLF COURSE TO "CF" COMMUNITY FACILITY FOR A CHURCH WITH A MAXIMUM OF 513 SEATS; PROVIDING FOR STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION STIPULATIONS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Jeremy Sterk of Hoover Planning, representing Lennar Partners, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the real property as more particularly described by Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, and located in Section 19, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "GC" Golf Course to "CF" Community Facility and the Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 0619N, as described in Ordinance 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code is hereby amended accordingly. The herein described real property is the same for which the rezone is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: I. Permitted uses on the subject property are limited to parking, preserve, landscaping, buffers, signage and infrastructure to support a church. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. AGENDA JAN 13 2004 Pa•� PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ,2003. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: TOM HENNING, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Marjorie M. Student Assistant County Attorney RZ- 2003- AR- 4080/RB /sp AGENDA la JAN 13 2004 pg. -33 ORDINANCE NO. 04 - AN ORDINANCE _OF THE BORAD OF - COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, AMENDING_ ORDINANCE NUMBER 91 -102, THE COLLIER COUNTY - -LAND - = DEVELOPMENT - CODE WHICH ESTABLISHED _ THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 0619N BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RATTLESNAKE- HAMMOCK ROAD CR -864 AND DORAL CIRCLE IN SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FROM "GC" GOLF COURSE TO "CF" COMMUNITY FACILITY FOR A CHURCH; PROVIDING FOR STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION STIPULATIONS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Jeremy Sterk of Hoover Planning, representing Lennar Partners, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the real property as more particularly described by Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, and located in Section 19, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "GC" Golf Course to "CF" Community Facility and the Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 0619N, as described in Ordinance 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. The herein described real property is the same for which the rezone is hereby approved subject to the conditions on Exhibit `B ": SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. AR- 2003 -RZ -4080 JAN 13 2004 Pg. r A PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2004. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS - = COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AAtNDy LEGAL SU�F'jFIICIENCY L Marjori . Student Assistant County Attorney RZ- 2003- AR- 4080/RM/sp AR- 2003 -RZ -4080 - 2 AC,ENDj 7 - Na JAN 13 2004 pg �� LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "A" LELY GOLF ESTATES TRACT MAP AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8 PAGE 20 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF S.R. S -864 AND THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT "A" THENCE S89 032'32 "E ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 590.31 FEET THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE S00 020'32 "W A DISTANCE OF 299.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF A DRAINAGE EASEMENT THENCE ALONG SAID EASEMENT N89 034'57 "W A DISTANCE OF 590.70 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF DORAL CIRCLE THENCE N00 °24'58 "E ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY A DISTANCE OF 299.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINING 4.06 ACRES MORE OR LESS. F A�N &lb ► It A,z AR- 2003 -RZ -4080 ITEM No 1 12 JAN 13 2004 pg 3� CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (RZ -03 -AR -4080) a) The permitted uses on the subject property are limited to church and associated accessory uses. b) Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if, during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity an historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. c) Access to the site shall not be allowed from Doral Circle. d) A Type D buffer will be placed along the eastern boundary of the site to protect the single - family neighborhood to the east. e) No daycare operation is permitted on this site. EXHIBIT "B" AR- 2003 -RZ -4080 AGEWA I No. JAN 13 2G'UA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CUR- 2003 -AR -3776 REQUEST BY WILLIAM L. MC DANIEL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE RE- REVIEW OF CU -98 -12 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4125 OIL WELL ROAD (CR 858), FURTHER DESCRIBED AS SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners to make a determination in the community's interest to either agree to the current conditions and operations or to reconsider the conditions and operations of CU -98 -12 for an earthmining operation. CONSIDERATIONS: On September 22, 1998, the Board of Zoning Appeals approved CU -98 -12 for an earthmining activity in the "A" Rural Agricultural Zoning District. CU -98 -12 included conditions identified as exhibit "D ". Condition "b" requires that "The conditional use approval shall be reviewed at the end of five years to determine whether additional stipulations or mitigation are necessary to insure compatibility with other properties in the area and to assure public health, safety and welfare is adequately addressed." This petition is before the Board of Zoning Appeals to satisfy that original condition of approval Mr. William L. McDaniel, President of Big Island Excavating, Inc., and lessee and operator of the Winchester Lakes earthmining activity, has submitted a request for this fifth year conditional use re- review. The staff has met with Mr. McDaniel and his engineer to review the performance of the earth excavation activities at Winchester Lakes based upon the conditions that were placed in CU- 98 -12. In addition to this initial meeting, Mr. McDaniel was present during a July 7, 2003, on -site inspection of the earthmining operation by the reviewing County staff. The on- site inspection was utilized to evaluate the site's compliance with the original conditions of approval. During the on -site inspection, staff found that the facility was deficient with regards to conditions "c and k" of the original approval. Condition "c" requires the removal of all exotic vegetation on site. There were areas where exotic vegetation was growing on the property. Condition "k" requires the installation of a berm not less than six feet in height. A berm was in place, but there were areas where the height of the berm was less than six feet in height. Mr. William L. McDaniel and the staff have agreed to modify the Conditions of the agreement to reflect the following: 1. Item (b) CU -98 -12 shall be amended to require a re- reviewed on a 5 -year cycle from the anniversary date of its approval until the earth mining operation is co"' No. CUR - 2003 -AR -3776 BCC Date: January 13, 2004 9e 1J 3 ` 13 2004 M,__,..L.__ 2. Item (g) CU -98 -12 shall be amended to require a $500,000.00 maintenance bond shall be maintained for the life of this project, 3. Item (k) CU -98 -12 shall be amended to require a berm to be installed and maintained of not less than ten feet in height along the property lines adjacent to the Estates zoned properties, 4. These modifications shall be incorporated within the original Conditions of Approval attached to CU- 98 -12, and shall be make part of the official record. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this Conditional Use re- review will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of this Conditional Use re- review will have no effect on the Growth Management Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: The environmental issues were addressed in the original Conditional Use application review and approval. The approval of this Conditional Use re- review will not create additional environmental issues. HISTORIC /ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: The historical /archaeological impact was addressed in the original Conditional Use application review and approval. The approval of this Conditional Use re- review will not create an additional historical /archaeological impact. EAC RECOMMENDATION: The Environmental Advisory Board previously reviewed this petition for the original Conditional Use application. Their recommendations were added to the original conditions. The approval of this Conditional Use re- review will not adversely impact the previously approved conditions. CCPC RECOMMENDATION: The Collier County Planning Commission heard the original petition on September 3, 1998, and recommended its approval. The Collier County Planning Commission is not required to review conditional use re- reviews. CUR - 2003 -AR -3776 BCC Date: January 13, 2004 JAN 13 2004 Page 2 of 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the BCC approve the Conditional Use re- review for CU -98 -12 with the proposed amendments to the previously approved conditions. PREPARED BY: /Z zz 0.3 ICHAEL J. DE UNTZ, 2CFM DA E PRINCIPAL ANNER DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEWED BY: i2 a d� SAN MURRAY, AICP DA E INTERIM DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: JOS H K. SCH ITT E(ATIf C MUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR CUR - 2003 -AR -3776 BCC Date: January 13, 2004 rx JAN 13 2004 Pa. 3 Page 3 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2004— A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PROVIDING FOR THE CONFIRMATION OF THE PRIOR ESTABLISHMENT OF CONDITIONAL USE "1" IN "A" ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2.2.3 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TOGETHER WITH THE MODIFICATION OF THE STIPULATIONS GOVERNING THE OPERATION OF THE EARTHMINING FACILITY LOCATED IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67 -1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125 Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of conditional uses; and WHEREAS, on September 22, 1998, the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, approved Resolution Number 98 -395 which established an earthmining facility conditional use (Conditional Use "1" of Section 2.2.2.3 in Rural Agricultural "A" Zone of the Land Development Code); and WHEREAS, Paragraph "b" of Exhibit "D" of said Resolution provides as follows: The conditional use approval shall be reviewed at the end of five years to determine whether additional stipulations or mitigation are necessary to insure compatibility with other properties in the area and to assure public health, safety and welfare is adequately addressed. Development Services staff will use the following standards in their review and, in the event of the inability of Development Services and applicant to agree upon additional stipulations or mitigation, the matter will be referred to the Board of Zoning Appeals using the Land Development Code procedural requirement for appeals. WHEREAS, Resolution Number 98 -395, as recorded, remains in full force and effect; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has conducted the review of the earthmining activity as required by the Resolution; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented. CUR - 2003 -AR -3776 -2 AGENDA ITEM N0. JAN 13 2004 f. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The petition, CUR - 2003 -AR -3776, filed by Jeff L. Davidson, DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC., representing, Joseph D. Bonness of Southern Sand and Stone, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein be hereby confirmed as Conditional Use "I" of LDC Section 2.2.2.3 of the "A" Zoning District for earthmining and be permitted to continue operations as stipulated herein in accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "C ") and subject to the following conditions: Exhibit "E" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of 2004. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: IQ-A-- " — Patrick G. Mite Assistant County Attorney JAN 13 2004 Pg. CUR - 2003 -AR -3776 2 -2 SEP 2 21998 RESOLUTION 98- 395 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT , OF EARTH MINING CONDITIONAL USE, "1'r' IN THE "A" ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT'TO SECTION 2.2.2.3 OF THE COLLIER ,COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE -FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN + SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67 -1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes,' has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance. No. 91 -102) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission,,being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of Conditional Use "1" of Section 2.2.2.3 in an "A" Zone for earth mining on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A ") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida that: -1- JAN 13 2004 Pg.- ;)cr z 11998 The petition filed by Jeff L. Davidson of Davidson Engineering, Inc., representing Joseph D. Bonness for Southern Sand and Stone, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter des,ci,ibedas: Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and,inGorporated by reference herein be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Use "1" of. Section 2.2.2.3 of the "A" Zoning District for earth mining in accordance with the Conceptual Master 'Plan (Exhibit "C ") and subject to the following conditions: Exhibit "D" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion,•second and majority vote. Done this o1-Z day of , 1998. BOARD OF ZONING•APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chairmah•s _signature only. ZZ �,_3 e4_ A proved as to Form and Ldgal . Sufficieficy:. MarjWie M. Student Assistant County Attorney f/CU -98 -12 RESOLUTION -2- AGLMAIIcm N0. JAN 13 2004 Pa.__1_ SEP 2 219 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU -98 -12 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.2.2.3.1 of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not.adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of:, A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed, structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be.mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval DATE: f /CD -98-12 FINDING OF FACT CHAIRMAN/ CHAIRMAN: EXHIBIT "A" JAN 13 200' pg.--i,__- SEP 2 2199 Legal Description Section 16, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, less the south 50 feet Road ROW., Collier County, Florida. i AGENDA REM EXHIBIT "B" JAN 13 2004 P9 M z v M v � m 1 . .. s ro wig, all, z ,az z a — z 1�WOO EXMMNO FAHKAUNION CANAL oilman IN °N9 e °64666 V iii N m B A ;t is DUFM EXHIBIT "C" i� i f a a� {�I I JAN 1 3 o'f v2-1 46 a- INJ63 AGREEMENT I, Jeff L. Davidson, as authorized agent for Petition CU- 98 -12, agree to the following stipulations requested by the Collier County Planning Commission in their public hearing on September 3, 1998. { Planning Services: a. The Current Planning Manager may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the conditional use. Expansion of the uses identified ,and approved within this conditional use application, or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply' with all 'applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance (91 -102). b. The conditional use approval shall be reviewed at the end of five years to determine whether additional stipulations or mitigation are necessary to insure compatibility with other properties in the area and to assure public health, safety and welfare 'is adequately addressed. Development Services staff will use the following standards in their review and, in the event of the 'inability of Development Services and applicant to agree upon additional stipulations or mitigation, the matter will be referred to the Board of Zoning Appeals using the Land Development Code procedural requirement for appeals. The standards for review are: 1. At least six months prior to the fifth anniversary of the Board of Zoning Appeals approvals, applicant shall submit a noise study acceptable to Development Services staff to determine whether additional berming, landscape or buffers are necessary to insure compatibility with adjacent residential structures. 2. At least six months prior to the fifth anniversary of this approval, applicant ` will submit to Development Services a Traffic Study conducted in a manner approved by County Transportation Department that assesses the level of service on County Road 858, the project's impact on County Road 858, and any mitigation needed to address this project's impacts on automotive and pedestrian safety along the section of County Road 858 from the project entrance on CR 858 to the intersection of CR 858 and CR 846. Additional mitigative measures that may be required include: EXHIBIT "D" i JAN 13 2004 Pg. (a) Project contribution (on a proportional share basis) to add signalization or turn lanes for other public roads or for institutional uses accesses on County Road 858 west of the project. (b) Limitation of the number ofhaul trips from the project.to a'maximum of 175 per 24 -hour period. . I • ' (c) Changes in days or hours of operation but no less than. 60 hours of operation per, week (Stipulation I) to lessen project traffic interface with school or other traffic on CR 858 or other impacted' County roads. (d) Contribution of its proportionate share costs for any additional sidewalks needed in the vicinity of any institutional uses located on County Road 858. (e) Mitigation of abnormal wear or tear caused by this project's use of County Road 858 west of its entrance that are not addressed by the / payment of impact fees. 3. Development Services Department may require additional studies or reports to demoristrate that there are no adverse environmental impacts resulting from operations of Winchester Lakes. C. The petitioner shall remove all exotic vegetation on site as listed in the LDC 3.9.6.4.1 prior to any excavation activities on site. Subsequent annual exotic removal (in perpetuity) shall be the responsibility of the property owner. d. Turn lanes shall be required, both eastbound and westbound, on CR 858 at the project entrance. e. The petitioner shall be responsible for the maintenance of the turn lanes for the life of the project. Failure to properly maintain the pavement shoulders, signage, and pavement markings shall be cause for revocation of the CU permit. A condition survey of CR 858 from its intersection with CR 846 shall be performed by the Road and Bridge Section prior to the start of any activity on this site. The results of that survey shall be used as a baseline for future maintenance of the roadway. g. The petitioner shall post a maintenance bond in the amount of $100,000.00 for the life of the project. This bond shall be used for the maintenance of CR 858 damages EXHIBIT "D" 2 JAN 13 2004 f. % o� SEP 2 21998 above normal wear and tear caused by this project. h. A:traffic routing plan shall be submitted to the County for review and approval prior to the start of any earth mining activity on the site. A copy of this plan shall be forwarded to the Collier County Board- of Public Schools. i. Hours of operation shall'be 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Friday; no excavation or hauling operation shall be allowed on Saturday or Sunday, except in instances where contracts for "public" jobs dictate otherwise. j. Any blasting shall require a permit from Planning Services and shall comply with Collier County Blasting Ordinance. k. The applicants shall install a berm not less than six feet in height along the property lines adjacent to the Estates zoned properties as each phase is initiated. 1. The excavation shall be Iimited to a lowest. possible bottom elevation of 25 feet below existing grade unless a permit modification is applied for through the EAB and the BCC and shall be no shallower than 10 feet below existing grade. m. Prior to any site *provement proposed in relation to this excavation or clearing, the owner shall contact the USACOE and SFWNID to determine if wetland permitting is needed. If so, all agency permits shall be obtained, prior to the commencement of any site improvements. PE OR AGENT State of Florida County of Collier The , foregoing Agreement Sheet was acknowledged before. ,me this 1 —7 day of esiz 1998, by -s ��f. i�AVi�SQ N, who is personally known to me or who has produced Ff t_ bR +V EJZ S Q S£j..Y ,4: as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. AZJ-(�� M ciokzL�a��—. (Signature of Notary Public) NOTARY PUBLIC Commission # CC (e% (o VI My Commission Expires: -01 EXHIBIT "D" 3 X11 No.� OJAN 13 2064 Pt.--L--3 W COMMesm t cc Sre mvft Z MM W" ram nosy Pdft admr SEP 2 21999 REPRESENTATIVE FOR CCPC State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Agreement Sheet was acknowledged before me this day of Se eT 1998, by'v i 61 4e l 04ULS , who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (d� no'�t) take an oath. i IMMUM3wWra 66M WAM eo4dan:. � nw um�wWs NOTARY PUBLIC Commission # My Commission Expires- A(iEPR)`A 11tM N&_1 --1� JAN 13 2004 SUPPLEMENTAL GONDITIONSI CUR- 2003 -AR -3776 , RESOLUTION 98 -395 , 1. Item (b) CU -98 -12 shall be amended to require a re- reviewed on a 5 -year cycle , from the anniversary date of its approval until the earth mining operation is completed, 2. Item (g) CU -98 -12 shall be amended to require a $500,000.00 maintenance bond shall be maintained for the life of this project, , . 3. Item (k) CU -98 -12 shall be amended to require a berm to be installed and maintained of not less than ten feet in height along the property lines adjacent to the Estates zoned properties, 4. These modifications shall be incorporated within the original Conditions of Approval attached to CU- 98 -12, and shall be make,part of the official record. EXIMIT "E" JAN 13 2004 f. /� Sheet i of 2 AVPLAT2003- AR4700 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PETITION AVPLAT2003- AR4700 TO DISCLAIM, RENOUNCE AND VACATE THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A PORTION OF THE 15 FOOT WIDE COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED IN TRACT "D ", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF "RIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER" AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 18, PAGES 19 THROUGH 20, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOCATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST. OBJECTIVE: To adopt a Resolution to vacate a portion of the 15 foot wide County Utility Easement (CUE) in Tract "D ", according to the plat of "Riverchase Shopping Center." CONSIDERATIONS: Petition AVPLAT2003- AR4700 has been received by the Collier County Engineering Services Department from Dominick J. Amico, P.E., from Agnoli, Barber & - Brundage, Inc., as agent for the petitioner, Germain Real Estate Company, LLC, requesting the vacation of a portion of the 15 foot wide County Utility Easement (CUE) located in Tract "D ". The CUE was dedicated to Collier County by the plat of "Riverchase Shopping Center" and was intended to accommodate proposed potable water mains to be owned and maintained by Collier County. Plans for building the remainder of the phased shopping center have been replaced by a different type of project. The CUE is unnecessary because Collier County no longer accepts utility facilities on private commercial property. The CUE needs to be vacated in order to construct the new project now proposed. Letters of no objection have been received from the following Collier County Departments: Public Utilities, Engineering Services and Transportation. A letter of no objection has also been received from Riverchase Owners Association, Inc. Zoning is P.U.D. A copy of this Executive Summary and the date of the County Commission Board Meeting were sent to Ed Kant in Transportation and to Jacquelyn Johnson in Public Utilities on Nov. 19, 2003. FISCAL IMPACT: Planning Services has collected a $1,000 "Petition to Vacate" fee from the petitioner which covers the County's cost of advertising, recording and processing the Petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact associated with this Executive Summary. No.�_� JAN 13 2004 Sheet 2 of 2 AVPLAT2003- AR4700 ENGINEERING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Adopt the Resolution for Petition AVPLAT2003- AR4700 for the vacation of a portion of the 15 foot wide County Utility Easement (CUE) in Tract "D" according to the plat of "Riverchase Shopping Center "; and 2. Authorize the execution of the Resolution by its Chairman and direct the Clerk to the Board to record a certified copy of the Resolution in the Official Records; and 3. Request the Clerk to the Board to make appropriate marginal notes on the recorded plat. PREPARED BY: c;- t Z=-r 4t Rick Grigg, P.S.M. Engineering Services DATE: �..t�LC/ REVIEWED )3Y: DATE: / D3 Thomas E. Kuck, P.E. Engineering Services Director APPROVED BY: K. Schmitt, 'Administrator inity Development & Environmental Services DATE: it/-2r,/0-3 JAN 1� -3f-2 -0-044 P9 RESOLUTION NO. 2004- A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR PETITION AVPLAT2003- AR4700 TO DISCLAIM, RENOUNCE AND VACATE THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A PORTION OF THE 15 FOOT WIDE COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED IN TRACT "D ", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF "RIVERCHASE. SHOPPING CENTER" AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 18, PAGES 19 THROUGH 20, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOCATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 177.101, Florida Statutes, Dominick J. Amico, P.E., from Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc., as agent for the petitioner, Germain Real Estate Company, LLC, does hereby request the vacation of a portion of the 15 foot wide County Utility Easement located in Tract "D ", according to the plat of "Riverchase Shopping Center" as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 19 through 20, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the Board has this day held a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of the 15 foot wide County Utility Easement located in Tract "D ", according to the plat of "Riverchase Shopping Center," as more fully described below, and notice of said public hearing to vacate was given as required by law; and WHEREAS, the granting of the vacation will not adversely affect the ownership or right of convenient access of other property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the County's easement interests over and across the following portion of the 15 foot wide County Utility Easement are hereby vacated, extinguished, renounced and disclaimed, and this action is declared to be in the Public's interest and for the Public's benefit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. No. 11 JAN 13 2004 Page 1 Of 2 1 3 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk to the Board is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, and to make proper notation of this vacation on the recorded plat as referenced above. This Resolution is adopted this day of 2004, after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATED: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Jennifer A. Be] a 'o, Esq., Assistant County torney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Page 2 Of 2 Chairman No. L7 �-- JAN 13 2004 Pg._ c EXHIBIT "N' SHEET 1 OF 2 0 r rn C C o ' o o r, V) CL 4 il' o�L=aa. W vg °� is o II Ln o I 1 O o 00 'jQI N Q L S` W Z W W I w II p p a a iii O Waa > >- a oay J D I�^ � 1 I o LL a o'+ V V O O o o e v` \ 1 1 W N 00000 w - . Z I � cic 1 Q O Z �3 a a 1 W : EO o w E pD I I o , LL m V z z 2 yy, z WQ I I ~ �=:♦ 2WyyF � QD I rn� w 1 ILD JAN 1 3-1.2004 PQ. / 1 r, V) CL 4 il' o�L=aa. W vg °� p 1 D I I 1 O W 00 'jQI 1 L/N I I W II II w xyF a Al z a R�'��e3in`e I iii I I O [�-+V� U> r 1 I o LL a U +�� o00s;�= W 1 \ 1 1 00000 Q) cic 1 1 1 JAN 1 3-1.2004 PQ. / I I U; m P N 1 I I I W I� v 1� Q) cic 1 1 1 1 t pD I I Q _ 1 WQ I I ~ QD I 1 ILD co 1 I ct J ' F•- I I I - -- 1 j Iii Q N I I Q W -' -: 1 � I I I I I �m N NI 1 m p cry - -7L -- �ZiY ------- t -' - - -_J ' - - t_---- ------ -------- - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - -- t\ CL -- �a -- -- -- LU W Z o- UV U U Q 3� ?� oti ono JAN 1 3-1.2004 PQ. JAN 13 2004 PQ EXHIBIT "A" a6 SHEET 2 OF 2 a� AVPLAT2003- AR4700 t o o u m L U V O v y I fv .7 Icn N ICL SX °o 0 Z II U o Fr r ° qv °n m000 - otomon000' 01hO�Y'JWhOObhOh OjOOa�OpObOp Op 0nO00n 00h00 I %- a C.�x ��y b O� 00 W ^._._ q) h to N Co ^ 1� .- ._ µ ._ NuONhNNM bMh 0 'M�MNM�M�NaNb� , FOU A r, 7 sR .- IE'xOa Na 0 z� °d p'Fa •O q1' W3WWww3W3333w3w3�U „w333w33WWW3w�.,W3W3333W o aOWG• °Z■ O ^Oi •- Of :� 01 •- Ol :� Ol :� Q� ._ 01 .- 0I O) •- OI .- p� .- p� .� 01 .- p� : Of N ') OI Of Z Z W fA V] `' y�y !"1 N!7N,M N!,� N_v'f N !”) N N!•� N!") N N!7 N!7 N!'� N M 04' ") N!'l N !� N !'1 N!'l N N "- Q �--� O v`� 0 11 1 � � a.�� tnvh.rhyhVh:i}N°lhvhOvhjOp�P' OP'))p� p U) p:n p h Oub),O NO`t -'__._ _1-- a FWtn a'p to O. O, O. O 0 e b._R7 17D M• �' 0D ^a0.- MbMco. -OD• OD DD q7 00 R7 CD ^4] ^b^ I � xmV 00 y ��b q S �oaJOwov0000�owo .rvvvo¢�oaooaoowo�omomo(10 ( U °tea tl ZZZLn2�n�JJnvf ZZZZ2ZZzozLnZZZ (r) Ln2:V)0(lZyLnLn(AZcnZVJ A a gag3a NMah40N CO .- NM7u'fbhOp O>O. -NM�th tor" 00(h 0.- NM7w)bn 00 I� jsj '� WvU MO NNNNNNNNNNMMMMMMMMM 6 Q Vri 0 R' zL I� nl000 � �5 �oo 000o0oa00o co 00 eu Wo m ` aj 000000 00 Y V w - 000000000 w� 000000000 p, u °.3 W LL Q >= W j }_ G W� cn�0 2 vi Z � W C) W ti W `ice O U J ¢ O O Q ZU U¢t^ ~ w W "K f= F_ 1� 1= F= .. F= '' . _ F- V- F= h- ~ O WWWWwLjtj L= WWW�- WLwV W~F F'1- L`Ji_''► -w WWW O OU Qz > ON C'4 �00 -: uujuwj L'i W L LWi WW�`LLWLWi�WLWiWWW WWW WW WWW WLWLWWWQ WW OW LWWi�WWWWtWL` O�OCo n0 LL WWO W L WN 00 U m = Ln LL- 0 0 Q OO)O h 00 0 0 m p 00 �� O a o m� 0p M Ch J� 0 0 0 0 x 0 0 0 0 ^ 0 0 0^ O O> Lr� �O (n (W¢ WmZ W rOj ��N^ �01^ n��N��i�N�NNh�u 1��oN��ui ^ N ^m QO W 20) O U L-W W W WLLWLLWLLWW WLLLLWWL - LiLiLiLA- LL- L- LLLL- WLLLLL,L- WL,W WW W 000000000000 p00000000p0000000a000o000� -U WOE U U� W W > U 0WW U l m �Fz LL W W W W W W W W W W W W W W LU W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W UUUU U UU U UU Q) Q) U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U w F-• Ln 0 �¢ O ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ2ZQZZZ2ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZj WW W li�1- FQ- F¢- F¢- F¢- lQ -FQ-IQ FQ tiFQ- JQL�- F¢- 1¢- MQFF¢- tiFQ- IQ�FQ- fQ- F¢- IF¢- F¢- VQ -IQ-U cn2!Q co nQ nLn<n(nN(n1�VI�n�1_nL�Ln�nF- <L Oap tr) ._ �" =�Z F-iZ0 InLo LntnVlv��tnV) nQ U) (n[nL_I!ntQ�Q pOaQapppOQ,C pC p�pDO�Q, QQQQD00 C 60C) 000 W2 mQ W Q YO O U 4 Q¢ Q¢ Q Q¢ Q Q¢ Q¢ Q Q Q¢ Q¢ Q¢¢ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q¢ Q¢ Q O �m WZL 2 - Lu34itut. itu3t. i3333W3W3�. i !�i3�3t.i33t��.iLU3W4i4i3W3333� Z OQ F'� _ N! OLVN!)NN!)ON. r•rO 0 ^OW Na W �-0 p !'; N 77N! JN! 7N�Ly�N!) �N! 7N! N!�Nn) NnN u�v��r�' •rv)vvu) Iru)vhv�vhv�n "v10ItW) LAD ON �� NWT v�vtn�ru�au�vuJ ; n0! �0nOnOnO! n0' to 0nO;nO!nO:nO!nO:n NW m ¢¢ WW OD 00 UD n�CO nmmm00O!CQ 00000000OOE; E 3pONOo3Om00a00nO0!Con0O0hmpO0W 0 UO p :2 Z:2 2vi0Uiai2ZZZ22ZZL6:2 L6 ZZC6 : i0OiZ�iEdViviZL6zio Z� QW Z =�o� 2�¢ �� WU a0W WWWWWWW WWLiJWL4JW WW WLULUWWWWWWWWtaJWWWWW WL-lWWWZ UUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU ZU ¢W Om ��Nm ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ22ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ? F'> QUO �Li �� O_WO WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWCI 222222222222222222222222222222 =222222W Zm OZ3 ¢ W U O F- F- F- F- V- 1- F- 1- F- F- F- F- F- F- 1� i- F- F- F- F- f- 1- F- !� F- I+ F- F- F- 1- F- F- F- F- 1- 1- V-. F- Qj U In JAN 13 2004 PQ _��1.L7i� L' f ,aW�� /4 I' Attachment i PETITION FORM FOR VACATION OF PLATS OR PORTIONS OF PLATS OF SUBDIVIDED LAND (Please note, no portion of the plat is to be vacation, only platted utility easements.) A v Pc. p-r Z o o 3- R Z 4700 Date Received:.4u�, z /, eoep 3 Petition ff: Petitioner: Germain Real Estate Company, LLC Address: 13315 Tamiami Trail North Telephone: (239) 592 -5550 City /State: Naples, FL Zip Code: 34110 Agent: Dominick J. Amico, Jr., P.E. /Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. Address: 7400 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Telephone: (239) 597 -3111 City/State: Naples, FL Zip Code: 34108 Address of Subject Property: 11286 Tamiami Trail North Location: Section 22 Township 48S Range 25E Subdivision: Riverchase Shopping Center Legal Description: Lao Tract D Block Unit Plat Book 18 Page(s) 19 — 20 Reason for Request: To facilitate land development in a manner differing from that originally envisioned Current Zoning: PUD Does this affect density? No I hereby authorize Agent abov epresent me for this petition: ® Yes ❑ No Signature etitioner Date Robert L. Germain. Jr. Print Name (Title) Please see "Policy and Procedure for the Vacation and Annulment of Plats or Portions of Plats of Subdivided Land" for the list of supportive materials which must accompany this petition, and deliver or mail to: Community Development & Environmental Services Division Planning Services Department 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Florida 34104 (1) If applicant is a land trust, indicate the name of beneficiaries. (2) If applicant is a corporation other than a public corporation, indicate the name of officers and major stockholders. (3) If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, indicate the name of principals. (4) List all other owners. Attachment `B" Pagc 4 of 4 JAN 13 2001 P9•--1-- Official Receipt - Collier County Board of County Commissioners CDPR1103 - Official Receipt Trans Number I Date Post Date Payment Slip Nbr 428763 9/4/2003 3:04:51 PM 9/4/2003 AR 4700 Appl Name: AGNOLI BARBER & BRUNDAGE Appl Stage /Status: REVIEW STAGE NO. 1 /PENDING Address: DOMINICK J. AMICO, JR., P.E. 7400 TAMIAMI TRAIL N. #200 NAPLES FL 34108 Proj Name: GERMAIN AUTO DEALERSHIP AT RIVERCHASE Type: TAZ:27 Subdiv Nbr: 1522 Project Nbr: 2003010050 Payor : GERMAIN Fee Information Fee Code Description I GL Account I Amount Waived 12TRVC REV ACCT/ VAC EASEMENT -ROW 11313832032910000000 $1000.00 Total 1 $1000.00 Payments Payment Code I Account/Check Number Amount CHECK 165662 $1000.00 Memo: Collier County Board of County Commissioners CD -Plus for Windows 95 /NT Total Cash Total Non -Cash Total Paid $0.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 Cashier /location: GARRETT_S / 1 User: SMITH —G No. -L JAN 13 2004 pg. Printed:9 /4/2003 3:05:16 PM 07/11/2003 11:13 299R490823 uvwLc I I [ wLCAAN fax :139- 435 -1Z18 This wamanty Deed Prepared WrMOUT OPINION OR EXAMINATION OF THE BY: Harold J. Webre, Eta. GOODiTE, cOIFAiAAI 8110i lSON, ?A. 40-0I Ta rJrri Trail North, 5ulte 3 Naples, FL 34103 f3Z2.011 WARRAMY DEED PAGE 02/04 Jul 11 2003 10 :54 F.02 3188972 OR. 3297 PG: 3046, 13=931111 la 0111M 1113CM1 ;f CoWn =M, I'- 45/22/2193 et 01:1M 921M. D. "11OCl, am M!! IS0101,06 ne "M 34111 Doc -.16 21360,00 Rka: moss" 'ti MUM IR AL 9061 tnK.3AlIt !8 11314 alas n 334113 THIS WARR IN Y DEED, is made this �O day of May 2003, between COCONUT FROPERTdMS, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, Grantor, and GEF14MN REAL ESTATE COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Grantee, whose post office address is 13315 North Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34110. The Grantor, in consideration ofthe sum of TIrNAND NO/l 00 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the following described property, situatcd, lying and being in 4o'lier County, Florida, to wit. SEE EXMIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN Grantor warrants that the real property is not now, nor has it ever been, the homestead of such Grantor, nor is it contiguous to any hoarlestead of 511ch Grantor, and the real property is presently vacant and unimproved land, Folio Number: 69587540501 SUBJECT TO: (a) real property ad valorem taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2002; (b) zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; (c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interest($), of record, if any and (d) restrictions, reservations and easements common to the subdivision. And said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said properly. and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. WAS DcW Age Nn 160 No.-11-1- JAN 13 2004 PQ•�_ 0—f/11/2903 • 1 7 '7'Jn nO 417 onr 01 0n� 11.1J LJJF. `. JPLGJ H._l J C UUVULtIlt LULEMAN Fax:239- 435 -1218 Jul 111 20103 10:55 P.03 0141), 3297 °. 30717 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed and delivered thi3 warranty deed t;,e day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: f S'!"ture a ..r ess T ' *m 0 T l�tle�y� Pr t Name of Witness Siinatur 0 i ss 2 Print :Marne of Witness 2 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER COCONUT PROPEP171ES, iii}., a rjonda limited pd -tneer aiip DV%C MANAGEMENT,1NC., a Rorida corporation, its sale general partner By: Rainer N. Fdthaut its: Vice President The foregoing Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me thisday of A I 2003, by Rainer N. Filthaut, as Vice President and on behalf of liag Management, Inc., a Florida corporation, as sole genera]' partner and on behalf of Coconut Properties, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, who is ✓personally (mown to me or who produced as identificardon. csaKes CM40 My caa►nsSIDN 0 tx eWe j 4r' aco"TMU1J0�7njPu0[clAda�fon I (SEAL) t 1, Notary Pub I " . UANALicS My Commission Expires: My Commission Number is: W&mw Heed Fare vo. 2 of 3 �7 JAN 13 2004 Pg. /D A7/11/2003 11:13 2395490823 PAGE 04104 uvvul,rirt UVLtMAN Fs;j:239- 435-1216 Jul 11 2003 10:55 P.34 t "DRAB 3297 PG; 3048 "t EXHIBIT "A" A parcel of land lying in a part of the Northerly portion of Tract "D" of the plat of Riverchase Shopping Center as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 19 and 20, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, said parcel of land being more particularly described as follows. Beginning at the Northwesterly corner of Tract " B" of said Plat of Riverchase Shopping Center; thence North 01'04'29" West along the Westerly line of said Tract "D" or said plat for a distance of 315.50 feet to an intersection with the Southerly titre of Tract "C" of said plat; thence Forth 88'55'31" East along said Southerly line for a distance of 196.50 feet to an intersection with the Easterly line of said Tract "C "; thence North 01'04'29" West along said Easterly line for a distance of 210.09 feet to an intersection with the Northerly line of said Tract "D"; thence North 88'55'31" East along said Northerly line for a distance of 123.54 feet to an intersection with a Southwesterly line of Collier's Reserve as recorded in Plat Book 20. Pages 59 through 87, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence South 46'04'29" East along said Southwesterly line for a distance of 444.00 feet to an intersection with the Easterly line of the Northerly part of said Tract "D'; thence South DI 004'29" East along said Easterly line for a distance of 464.01 feet,, thence leaving said Easterly line South 88'55'31" West for a distance of 634.00 feet to an intersection with the said Westerly line of Tract "D "; thence North 01'04'29" West along said Westerly line for a distance of 10.00 feet to an intersection with the Southerly line of Tract "B" of said plat, thence North 88'55'31" East along said Southerly line for a distance of 187.00 feet to an intersection with the Easterly line of said Tract "B "; thence North 01'04'29" West along said Easterly line for a distance of 242.38 feet to an intersection with the Northerly line of said Tract "B'; thence South 88'55'31" West along :ald Northerly line for a distance of 187.00 feet to the point of beginning. JAN 13 2004 Pg. ___/L___— DUPLICATE 2002 COLLIER -OUNTY NOTICE OF AD VALOREM TAXES AND NON —AD VALOREM AS ESSMENTS LINT EARNED- (4 ;: IN NOV 3% IN DEC 2% IN JAN � 1 X IN FEB �0% IN MAR VALUE J 1: ' 1 MILL RATE 1 1 AMOUNT AUTHORITY # I• - J - PAY IN U.S. FUNDS DRAWN ON A U.S. BANK TO: 2 , 50 .5 , 8 115 AD VALOR_ EM TAXES' 3-9119 9, 8 02-50 CO UNTY 5 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 4. 3490 110 , 8 9 7. 7 9 SCHOOL - STATE 1 COURTHOUSE COMPLEX BUILDING C-1 2. 5 6 2 0 61419 • 90 SCHOOL-LOCAL 1 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 -4997 CITY 150518is 8069 • 5265 2, 021 . 94 DEPENDENTS 1, , 31, 9. 3 I WATER MGT. 2 ' MILL CODE ESCROW CODE 1-1167 2, 798 - 25 INDEP.SPECIAI 2 COCONUT PROPERTIES LTD .0268 67 • 16 VOTER APPR. DEBT. 6 4901, TAMIAMI TRL N 13.2998 33,326.85 20 NAPLES FL 34103-3010 RATE PER NOW 0 VALOREM ASSESSMENTS ROADS WATER/SEWER COMM. IMPROVE. GARBAGE 6 9 5 8 7.5 0 0 5 01, COMBINED TOTAL ,IVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER THAT PORTION OF TR ^D^ DESC AS COM NWL Y CNR TR B, N 11DEG 4' CONTINUED (PER TAX ROLL —PAGE > 00069.587.50001 0003332685 0000000000 00000 8 PAID 11/27/02 _311,993.78 REC# 77836.09 GUY L.- CA'RLTON — TAX COLLECTOR AGENDA ITEM No. JAN 13 2004 Pg.!� _. PALb9 CT H CHEE RIV y _ ' ;zT LID WALKERBILT RD - RIVE SHOPPING . r p,G • �, '. CENTIFS$ DDITI 4 i ESER `Y i•-,' , (VET CHASE SH PPING CdMAI� IBM! 111111 -Of4MER E I JNI PEL N (� GO Oli THR El AGENDA ITEM Noy -- JAN 13 2004 Pg.--LL- • PA. �� j��((•mm�J®l :� J.lti:l SI JE 1.lf `I Il[�1'��i Al ©��j�I yy�7 yy��y NOW IBM! 111111 -Of4MER E I JNI PEL N (� GO Oli THR El AGENDA ITEM Noy -- JAN 13 2004 Pg.--LL- - Jt lot Y _ � � -- _ _ � i 1..- _....tea � ,;s � - -. • f � No I �jt J �4L• t,V -��i j ti -�� A bT o� �wrT Pl�e � �►''r1r d _ z P4:1 - F � � ll� + r+. Y � f f g°rJ.•�E`L M 1 t Details Page I of 1 Current Ownershi I Folio No.11 69587500307 11 Prop$ ftg'Adbfbi§il'592600'TA'MIAMI TRL N ( Owner Namell GERMAIN REAL ESTATE CO LLC Addresses 13315 TAMIAMI TRL N Ci NAPLES State FL Zip 34110 - 6338 LegallLRIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER I h TRACT "C" Section Township Range Acres Map No. Strap No. 22 48 25 0.95 3A22 592600 C 13A22 Sub No. 592600 RIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER Millage Area I MIllaae Use Code 10 11 VACANT COMMERCIAL 143 13.2998 2003 Preliminary Tax Roll Values (Subject to change) Land Value ( +) Improved Value $ 827,640.011 $ 0.00 ( =) Market Value $ 897,640.00 ( -) SOH Exempt Value $ 0.00 (=)A sessed Value $ 827,640.00 ( -) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 0.00 ( =) Taxable Value $ 827,640.00 SOH = "Save Our Homes" exempt value clue to cap on assessment increases. C)(i)s Latest Sales History Date Book - Page Amount 0512003 3290-3091 95,000.00 0812600 2714-1989 $ 975,000.00 08/1999 JF 2580-3432 $ 3,584,000.00 03/1999 2524-1838 $ 3,500,000.00 The Information is Updated Weekly. http:// www. collierappraiser .com/RecordDetail. asp ?FolioID = 0000069587500307 AG80A ITIFM N& / , C JAN 1�3 2000h 0/22/2003 Details Current Ownership Folio No.1 69587503126 Property Addressll NO SITE ADDRESS Page 1 of 1 Owner Namel COCONUT PROPERTIES LTD Addressesi 4901 TAMIAMI TRL N Cityll NAPLES I State FL Zip 134103 - 3010 Legal RIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER FIRST ADDITION TRACT J Section-71 Township 11 Range �— Acres Map No. Strap No. 22 11 48 11 25 0 11 3A22 592605 J 13A22 Sub No. 11 592605 RIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER FIRST ADDITION ` Miilage Area Millaae f lase Code 95 MISCELLANEOUS 143 J1 13.2998 2003 Preliminary Tax Roll Values Latest Sales History (Subject to change) Land Value $ 100.00 ( +) Improved Value $ 0.00 ( =) Market Value $ 100.00 ( -) SOH Exempt Value L $ 0.00 ( =) Assessed Value ( -) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 100.0)0 $ 0.00 ( =) Taxable Value $ 100.00 SOH = "Save Our Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. 0 Date Book - Page Amount OB ! 1999 2580 .3432 $ 3,584,000.00 The Information is Updated Weekly. AGENDA ITEM No.� JAN 13 2004 Pg.--L!k- http://www.collierappraiser.com/RecordDetai 1. asp ?FolioID = 0000069587503126 10/22/2003 Details Current Ownership Folio No.11 69587500200 =Property AddressIl 11280 TAMIAMI TRL N Page 1 of 1 Owner Name MALOS CORP Addresses DBA WATERMARK GRILLE 11280 TAMIAMI TRL N Cityll NAPLES Statell FL 7777 Zip 34110 -1622 Legal RIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER TRACT "B" Section Township Range Acres Map No. Strap No. 22 �— 48 25 11 1.01 3A22 592600 B 13A22 Sub No. 592600 RIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER Millage Area I iIM laae� �sgSJe� 21 IMPROVED COMMERCIAL 143 13.2998 2003 Preliminary Tax Roll Values (Subject to change) Land Value ( +) improved Value $ 660,780.00 $ 473,177.00 ( =) Market Value $ 1,133,957.00 ( -) SOH Exempt Value $ 0.00 ( =) Assessed Value $ 1,133,957.00 ( -) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 0.00 ( =) Taxable Value $ 1,133,957.00 SOH = "Save Our Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. Latest Sales History Date Book - Page 71 Amount 07 / 1997 2331 - 2515 r —$ 705,000.00 The Information is Updated Weekly. http: / /wNvw. collierappraiser .com /RecordDetaii.asp ?FolioID= 0000069587500200 AGENDA ITEM -__ No._LY JAN 13 2004 10/22/2003 Details Current Ownership Folio No. 69587500404 Property Addressli 999 IMMOKALEE RD Page 1 of 1 Owner Namell RIVERCHASE & COURTHOUSE Addresses SHADOWS PROPERTIES LTD 4901 TAMIAMI TRL N City NAPLES L] State FL Zip 34103 - 3010 Legal RIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER THAT PORTION OF TR "D" DESC AS: COM NW CNR TR "A ", N 1DEG Map No. =1 4'29 "W 11 FT TO POB, THENCE 'For more than four lines of Legal Description please call the Property Appraiser's Office. Section Township Range Acres Map No. =1 Strap No. 22 =1 48 25 —� 12.1 11 3A22 592600 D 13A22 Sub No=.[ 592600 RIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER 1 Millage Area I ill, e Use Code 1 16 —� IMPROVED COMMERCIAL 143 11 13.2998 2003 Preliminary Tax Roll Values Latest Sales History (Subject to change) Land Value $ 4,130,733.00 ( +) Improved Value $ 4,144,934.00 ( =) Market Value E $ 8,275,667.00 ( -) SOH Exempt Value $ 0.00 ( =) Assessed Value $ 8,275,667.00 ( -) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 0.00 ( =) Taxable Value $ 8,275,667.00 SOH = "Save Our Homes" exempt value due to cap on assessment increases. Date Book - Page Amount 08 / 1999 F 2580- 3435 $ 21,609,700.00 The Information is Updated Weekly. AGENDA ITEM JAN 13 2004 Pg.� http:// ww-\v. collierappraiser .com/RecordDetail.asp ?FolioID= 0000069587500404 joa ` • i AM-4 COPY OF PLAT "RIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER" PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 19 DEDf CA TiON: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Collier Deve!opmen.t Corporation, a Florida Corporation, the owners of the lands described hereon have cawed this ofat entitled "RIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER" to be made and do hereby dedicate the streets, roads and easements as shown hereon as follows: All Drainage Easements (D.E.) and Access Easements to Collier County, and RIVERCHASE Owners' Association, .Inc., with Collier County not being responsible for maintenance of said Drainage Easements. All Collier Utility Easements (C.U.E.) to Collier County Water —Sewer District for installation and maintenance of their facilities. To all the owners of all tracts and their successors a right and an easement to enfoy and use that portion of Tract D designated by the Declarant (as is defined in the Declaration of Protective Covenants for Riverchose Shopping Center — See Note 7 hereon) for use by vehicular and pedestrian traffic for ingress and egress, utilities, and water management pursuant to Declaration referenced in Note 7 hereon. The rights granted to an owner herein may only be extinguished by mutual consent and agreement between owner and Declarant. In wit whereof sa_iwd_ -p�rsons have caused these presents to be signed this � doy of j= , 1990. Wl TNESS: CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. OWNER: Collier Development Corporation, a Florida Corporation. Clifford B. Barksdale, Senior V' PrytVent State of Florida County of Collier I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duty authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared Clifford B. Barksdale, to me known and known by me to be the Senior Vice— President of Collier Development Corporation, a Florida Corporation, named as dedicator on the foregoing plat, and that he acknowledged executinc the some voluntarily under authority duly vested in him by said corporation and that the seal affixed thereto is the true corporote seal of said corporation. WIIESS my bond and official seal in the County and State aforesaid this day of _ 1990. N0. al ) JAN 13 2004 pg. / ? D D 3 --1 D in r cn c Ln 1s O PC O i z 0 C3 m co D A r- A 2 0 i D 2 ONFL AT TED N 8855'31 1 v - i u ---- -- -- ----- - - ---- l.-- --- ------ --- --- — 10 --' i. 51 - -- - - - -, _ ___________4 --- 142 i i� /4 cn U 1 I o �+ ► 15' C.U.E. 1 ; 1 7.5-+ V 1 r D N 88'55 31 E 187.00 ' o 4. rq 1 , m y 1 O ct I , �► 1 � r OI 15' C.U.E. --� 1 1 0 R-2 7. s' 5' n O n I I t 1 a �Tr'T�s /69 i 2. V u I 1 1 1 I 1 OO 1 1 '1 G 1 1 + pl I I I v 1 I � 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 -� 15' C. U. E. II T' I r-7.5' m O � o COPY OF PLAT "RIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER" PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 20 P.0 coxm VI U O o � z y x D rn �O > v i -i IN 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 4 p � JS NI 1 8855.31"E 252.00 Z N 88'55'31'E. 244.00' ' O � N A p v 10 � � n � r b 1 b \ \ 1 116.00• i71 I / u o U'III m ' I� I 1 1 D n O I O1I H A ' D , I -1 O Ln D In O O N_ JAN 13 200 Pg._Ae _.__ ±r O ci � a tJ ni O N 88'55'31'E O b 196.50 1 v - i u ---- -- -- ----- - - ---- l.-- --- ------ --- --- — 10 --' i. 51 - -- - - - -, _ ___________4 --- 142 i i� /4 cn U 1 I o �+ ► 15' C.U.E. 1 ; 1 7.5-+ V 1 r D N 88'55 31 E 187.00 ' o 4. rq 1 , m y 1 O ct I , �► 1 � r OI 15' C.U.E. --� 1 1 0 R-2 7. s' 5' n O n I I t 1 a �Tr'T�s /69 i 2. V u I 1 1 1 I 1 OO 1 1 '1 G 1 1 + pl I I I v 1 I � 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 -� 15' C. U. E. II T' I r-7.5' m O � o COPY OF PLAT "RIVERCHASE SHOPPING CENTER" PLAT BOOK 18, PAGE 20 P.0 coxm VI U O o � z y x D rn �O > v i -i IN 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 4 p � JS NI 1 8855.31"E 252.00 Z N 88'55'31'E. 244.00' ' O � N A p v 10 � � n � r b 1 b \ \ 1 116.00• i71 I / u o U'III m ' I� I 1 1 D n O I O1I H A ' D , I -1 O Ln D In O O N_ JAN 13 200 Pg._Ae _.__ COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES DIVISION August 20, 2003 3301 E. lhrniami 1iai1 • Naples, Florida 34112 • (239) 732 -2575 • FAX (239) 732 -2526 Dominick J. Amico, Jr., P.E. Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. 7400 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34108 Re:_ Riverchase Shopping Center Easement Vacation Request Dear Mr. Amico: This office has reviewed your request to vacate the utility easements within the above referenced property. The Collier County Water -Sewer District has no facilities in the arcs and we therefore have no objection to the vacation of the easement. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at 732 -2571. Sincerely, o�rt.4p�C' Jacquelyn R. Johnson Engineering Technician CC" Paul Mattausch, Water Director Joseph Cheatham, Wastewater Director Rick Grigg, Land Surveyor, Community Development !AN 13 2004 9:\ engineeringtmh \ea3nent•r.e.w_51;X4' pveteh cPChnnA Cffi[�4_doa4 M t Y I PS•�— • AGNOLI �ARBER & BRUNDAGE, INC. Protession al engineers, planners, surve-�ors &mappers July 11, 2003 Mr. John R. Houldsworth Senior Engineer 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Riverchase Shopping Center Request for "Letter of No Objection" To The Vacation of a Utility Easement Dedicated (Exclusively) to Collier County, PN 8324 Dear Mr. Houldsworth: This letter is written to explain the conditions relative to the vacation of Collier utility easements within the Riverchase Shopping Center. The easements to be vacated were dedicated by plat for a phased shopping center and were intended to accommodate future Collier County owned and maintained potable water mains. The plans for the phased shopping center have been replaced by a current project. The easement as it exists on the plat is unnecessary because Collier County no longer accepts utility facilities on private commercial property. In order to construct the project now proposed, the vacation of a portion of the 15' platted utility easement within Parcel 2 of Tract D of the plat of Riverchase Shopping Center will be necessary. A copy of property appraiser's maps, as well as a sketch and description of the C.U.E. to be vacated is enclosed. This vacation was discussed at a pre - application meeting with Wes Hill at Development Services. He had no objection. If this vacation would be acceptable to your office, please sign this letter and return it to our office in the enclosed envelope. If further information regarding this proposal is required, please call our office at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Dominick J. Amico, Jr., P.E. DJA/j am Enclosures 02- 050j3.1tr I hav no objection to the proposed vacation. \w) V)P_ -11 t Gt d- Collier County Engineering Review Services Main Office: 7 400 T:.n -Jami Trail N., Sum: 200, Naples, Florida 34108 Lee County: 162 Hcucr.•. St., Sufic 101 , Fort \1y ers, l lone ?a 33901 No._ZT_� JAS! 13 2004 (2 019) 397 -3111 F.�1\: (239) 366 -2203 (2 -)9) 334 -1173 R', X: _2 39) 33 . -117; COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION 2705 S. HORSESHOE DRIVE TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FL 34104 (941) 774-8494 FAX (941) 659-5787 July 31, 2003 transportation@colliergov.net Dominick J. Amico, Jr., P.E. Agnoli Barber and Brundage 7400 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 Re: Request for Vacation of Utility Easements Riverchase Shopping Center US 41 North Dear Mr. Arnico: The Transportation Services Division has reviewed the subject request and we take no exception nor do we offer any objection to the vacation of the subject easements. Please advise if you need anything further on this issue at this time. Edward J. Kan -"a": T-a-spoo-i4 . A. I L Li cc: Norman E. Feder, AICP, Transportation Administrator Gregg Strakaluse, P.E., TECM Director Don Scott, AICP, Transportation Planning Director Diane Flagg, Traffic Operations and ATM Director Michael a. Etelamaki, P.E., Road Maintenance Director File: Vacations (Utility Easements) JAN 13 2004 Pg INC. Professional e!: inters, planners, sur • %OYs C mappers July 15, 2003 Mr. Reiner Filthaut, Vice President Riverchase Owners Association, Inc. 4901 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL 34103 Re: Riverchase Shopping Center Request for "L.etter of No Objection" To The Vacation of a Utility Easement Dedicated (Exclusively) to Collier County, PN 8324 Dear Mr. Filthaut: This letter is written to explain the conditions relative to the vacation of Collier utility easements within the Riverchase Shopping Center. The easements to be vacated were dedicated by plat for a phased shopping center and were intended to accommodate future Collier County owned and maintained potable water mains. The plans for the phased shopping center have been replaced by a current project. The easement as it exists on the plat is unnecessary because Collier County no longer accepts utility facilities on private commercial property. In order to construct the project now proposed, the vacation of a portion of the 15' platted utility easement within Parcel 2 of Tract D of the plat of Riverchase Shopping Center will be necessary. A copy of property appraiser's maps, as well as a sketch and description of the C.U.E. to be vacated is enclosed. This vacation was discussed at a pre - application meeting with Wes Hill at Development Services. He had no objection. If this vacation would be acceptable to your office, please sign this letter and return it to our office in the enclosed envelope. If further information regarding this proposal is required, please call our office at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Dominick J. Amico, Jr., P.E. DJA/jam Enclosures 02 -050j 3.Itr I have no objection to the proposed vacation. Riverchase Owners Association, Inc. _AGENDA ITEM WO.__L� JAN 13 2004 Pg -_,27� (2=9): 97-311 I FAX: f 2jyj -- G-!%u3 1.. -e County: 1525 He;;dry St , °•JitC 1v''1, Fort Myers, Florida 33 %1 239) 334 1173 F.��: (239; 334 i I; ,snvu.aubinc.corn r I' , s a9 F Uf 4 ti n f. t s`'R EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, REQUESTING THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (DCA) TO EXTEND THE TERMINATION DATE OF THE COUNTY'S CDBG AWARD AGREEMENT FOR A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT UNDER THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CATEGORY THAT PROVIDED FOR A PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MANUFACTURING FACILITY H AT THE IMMOKALEE REGIONAL AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners approve a resolution requesting the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) to extend the termination date of the County's CDBG Award Agreement for a Community Development Block Grant under the Economic Development category that provided for a portion of the construction of the Manufacturing Facility II at the Immokalee Regional Airport Industrial Park. CONSIDERATIONS: On October 1, 1999, the Board of County Commissioners received an executed CDBG Award Agreement with the Department of Community Affairs (DCA). As part of the grant application requirements, a private for - profit company, Global Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. (GMT) was identified as the participating party in the application. GMT executed the Participating Party Agreement (PPA) on August 3, 1999; however GMT was not able to perform the terms of the PPA. The BCC declared GMT in default on June 24, 2003. �. The lack of a lease agreement with a viable participating party has resulted in the manufacturing facility standing vacant for more than one year since the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) was issued on July 30, 2002. Florida Architectural Products, Inc. (FAP), has agreed to comply with the grant terms and has executed a PPA with the County (Item #16A3 at the BCC meeting on November 18, 2003). The current grant extension with the DCA is due to expire on March 27, 2004. Thus, the County and FAP have until March 27, 2004, to create the 22 FTEs to comply with the grant agreement terms. There is not adequate time to create the required jobs before the termination date of the agreement; thus a one -year extension is requested to allow FAP more time to create the required jobs. Per the Citizen Participation Plan, the Citizens Advisory Task Force (CATF) met on December 18, 2003, (a meeting notice was published on December 4, 2003 in the Naples Daily News), which was a public meeting, and approved the request for extension of the termination date of the Award Agreement (minutes attached). FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount funded ($750,000) is not expected to be impacted by the request to extend the termination date of the original contract. If the required jobs are not created, the County must repay the DCA $35,000 for each job not created. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This project is consistent with the policies and objectives of the Growth Management Plan and the Immokalee Master Plan. RECOMMENDATION: The Board of County Commissioners approve a resolution requesting the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) to extend the termination date of the County's CDBG Award Agreement for a Community Development Block Grant under the Economic Development category that provided for a portion of the construction of the Manufacturing Facility II at the Immokalee Regional Airport Industrial Park. AG60A rrEEm / JAN 13 20041 Pg. _ SUBMITTED BY: Date:—/a -a :k Lee Combs, HUD/Federal Grants Manager Fina cial Administrati n and Housing REVIEWED BY: Date: H. Denton Baker, Director Financial Administration and Housing APPROVED BY: Date: 03 Tph . Sc itt, Administrator nity Development & Environmental Services AGENDA JAN 13 2004 Pa �_ RESOLUTION NO. 2004 A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, REQUESTING THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (DCA) TO EXTEND THE TERMINATION DATE OF THE COUNTY'S CDBG AWARD AGREEMENT FOR A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT UNDER THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CATEGORY THAT PROVIDED FOR A PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MANUFACTURING FACILITY II AT THE IMMOKALEE REGIONAL AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK. WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Community Affairs awards grants through the Small Cities and Counties Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program of up to $750,000 to qualifying cities and counties for projects that benefit low -and moderate - income persons, aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight, or meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community and where other financial resources are not available to meet such needs; and WHEREAS, in an area known as the Immokalee Regional Airport Industrial Park and Foreign Trade Zone, the 10,504 SF building known as Immokalee Manufacturing Facility - Phase II was constructed to assist Low to Moderate Income (LMI) residents by helping to create new jobs for LMI households; and WHEREAS, a private for - profit company, Global Manufacturing Technology, Inc, (GMT) was identified as the participating party in the application. GMT executed the Participating Party Agreement (PPA) on August 3, 1999; however, GMT was not able to perform the terms of the PPA. The Board of County Commissioners (BCC) declared GMT in default on June 24, 2003; and WHEREAS, the lack of a lease agreement with a viable participating party resulted in the manufacturing facility standing vacant for more than one year since the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) was issued on July 30, 2002; and Page 1 of 3 JAN 13 2004 p WHEREAS, Florida Architectural Products, Inc. (FAP) has agreed to comply with the grant terms and has recently executed a PPA with the County (approved by the Board of County Commissioners at the BCC meeting on November 18, 2003 - Item #16A3). The current CDBG Award Agreement extension with the DCA is due to expire on March 27, 2004; the County and FAP have until March 27, 2004 to create the 22 FTEs to comply with the grant agreement terms. There is not adequate time to create the required jobs before the termination date of the CDBG Award Agreement; thus a one -year extension is requested to allow FAP more time to create the required jobs; and WHEREAS, the extension of the termination date of the CDBG Award Agreement does not change the original Agreement amount, the leveraged funds committed in the application, a modification to the Environmental Review Records, or the proposed number of jobs to be filled when the project is completed; and WHEREAS, per the Citizen Participation Plan, the Citizens Advisory Task Force (CATF) met on December 18, 2003 (a meeting notice was published on December 4, 2003 in the Naples Daily News), which was a public meeting, and approved the request for extension of the termination date of the CDBG Award Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: 1. The Collier County Board of County Commissioners hereby directs the Collier County Financial Administration and Housing Department to prepare, or cause to be prepared, all documents necessary to amend the CDBG Award Agreement to extend the termination date by one year (to March 27, 2005) to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for an Economic Development grant of $750,000. ITW N0. JAN 13 2004 Page 2 of 3 2. The Board of County Commissioners has previously authorized (Res. 99 -255, 6/8/99) the County Administrator or the Division Administrator of Community Development and Environmental Services to act on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners to sign all documents necessary for grant administration; this authorization is still in place. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners. This Resolution adopted this 13`h day of January, 2004 after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Approved as to form and Legal sufficiency: P ick to Assistant Co y Attorney BY: TOM HENNING, Chairperson Page 3 of 3 JAN 13 2004 Pg. S Collier County Citizen Advisory Task Force December 18, 2003 — 3:00 p.m. Financial Administration and Housing Community Development and Environmental Services 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104 Main Conference Room Agenda I. Call Meeting to Order and Roll Call II. Old Business a. Approval of September 18, 2003 meeting minutes III. New Business a. Review and ranking of FY 2004 -2005 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Public Services applications. b. Update and approval of an extension for the State of Florida Small Cities CDBG Program (Economic Development) for the Manufacturing Facility II at Immokalee Regional Airport, CDBG 00- DB- 6B- 09- 21- 01 -E05. c. Review of CATF member applications and recommendation to Board of County Commissioners d. Discussion regarding CDBG dollars returned by the County for the Linwood Drainage project from FY 02 -03 IV. Announcements a. Letter from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding the Annual Community Assessment 2002 Program Year — CDBG Program b. Date of next CATF meeting V. Adjournment of Meeting G:ICDBG\Citizen Advisory Task Force12003 CATF Meetings\Dec 18 -03 Mtg1CATF Agenda.doc ' / 7 AGENDA ITE� Na 1 JAN 13 2004 Pg. LP CITIZENS ADVISORY TASK FORCE COMMITTEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE December 18, 2003 Meeting (Minutes Tentative Until Approved by the CATF) I. The meeting was called to order at 3:02 p.m. by David Corban. There was a quorum present. ROLL CALL ABSENT PRESENT Bill McCarthy X Fred Thomas X Ellen Christian-Myers X David Corban X Russell Tuff X Staff Present: Financial Administration and Housing (FAH) staff — Denny Baker, Lee Combs, Rosa Munoz, Janeen Person, Julia Langhorn, Gary Young and Susan Alden. II. Old Business a. The minutes of the September 18, 2003 meeting were approved 5 -0. III. New Business a. The CATF reviewed six (6) FY 2004 -2005 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Public Services applications and voted that projects submitted by the Empowerment Alliance of Southwest Florida Community Development Corporation and David Lawrence Center be recommended to the BCC for full funding. Projects submitted by Immokalee Multicultural Multipurpose Community Action Agency, Inc. (IMMCAA) and St. Matthew's House were recommended for funding on the `B" list if all necessary documentation was submitted. NOTE: a court reporter was present for this portion of the meeting and a transcript will be available. b. The CATF was given an update of the Small Cities Community Development Block Grant - Immokalee Manufacturing Facility H. An extension is necessary to allow a new participating party, Florida Architectural Products, Inc. (FAP) adequate time to create the required jobs before the terminate date of the CDBG Award Agreement. Fred Thomas made a motion to request a one -year extension to the CDBG Award Agreement (until March 27, 2005) from the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA). Russell Tuff seconded. The motion was approved 5 -0. 4 AGENDA n`EM No. JAN 13 2004 P9 _� c. The CATF reviewed member applications. The three members whose terms were expiring- - David Corban, Ellen Christian-Myers and William McCarthy- -all applied to continue on the CATF. Each member excused themselves from the vote on their own recommendation to the BCC. The motion on David Corban was made by Fred Thomas and seconded by Ellen Christian- Myers; the vote to approve was 4 -0. The motion on Ellen Christian-Myers was made by Fred Thomas and seconded by Russell Tuff; the vote to approve was 4 -0. The motion on William McCarthy was made by Fred Thomas and seconded by Ellen Christian — Myers; the vote to approve was 4 -0. d. A discussion was held regarding the return by the County of the CDBG funds awarded to the Linwood Drainage project from FY 02 -03. A motion was made by Fred Thomas to reallocate all of the $329,046 to projects in Copeland. A second was made by Ellen Christian- Myers. The motion carried 5 -0. Specific proposed projects will be presented to the CATF by staff at the next meeting. N. Announcements a. A letter from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regarding the 2002 Program Year CDBG program was reviewed. Collier County received praise from HUD for achievements when the County is such a new Entitlement community. b. The date of the next CATF meeting is tentatively scheduled for February 12, 2004 at 4:00 p.m. V. The meeting was adjourned by 5:25 p.m. G: \CDBG \Citizen Advisory Task Force\2003 CATF Meetings\Dec 18 -03 Mtg \CATF Minutes 12- 18- 03.doc 3 AGENDA JAN 13 2004 P=. 9 PUBLIC NOTICE The public is advised that Collier County is submitting a request to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for an extension of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Award Agreement termination date. Collier County has received from the DCA a $750,000 Small Cities and Counties CDBG grant under the Economic Development category. This grant provided for a portion of the construction of the Manufacturing Facility II at the Immokalee Regional Airport Industrial Park. The extension request is necessary to create the required jobs under the CDBG Award Agreement. The extension request does not change the original award agreement amount, the leveraged funds committed in the original application, a modification to the Environmental Review Record, or the proposed number of jobs to be filled when the project is completed. The extension request and related materials are available for review in the Financial Administration and Housing Department, located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 _. P.M. A Public Hearing was held at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, on Thursday, December 18, 2003 at 3:00 p.m. to provide the public an opportunity to express their views concerning the request for extension of the termination date of the award agreement. Final action will be the approval of the extension request by the Board of County Commissioners at the regularly scheduled Board of County Commissioners meeting on January 13, 2004. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department at (239) 774 -8380 at least two (2) days prior to the meeting. AGENDA ITEM No.��11 JAN 13 2004 pit Tr � Rt01110P� Your vendor number with us 102127 NAPLES DAILY NEWS 1075 CENTRAL AVE NAPLES FL 34104 Please deliver to: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2800 N HORSESHOE DR NAPLES FL 34104 -6917 Page Field Pur chase:Order FPO Number / Date 4500022047 / 12/12/2003 Contact person/Telephone Fin Admin & Housng /239- 403 -2330 Our Tax ID no. 21- 07- 019995 -53C Send invoice to: Board of County Commissioners Attn: Finance Department P.O.Box 413016 (Naples, Fl. 34101 -3016 Delivery date: Day 02/02/2004 Terms of delivery: FOB DESTINATION Terms of payment: Payable immediately Due net Item Material Description Order qty. Unit Price per unit 00010 ad in newspaper 164.08000 each 1.00 Net value Total net value excl. tax 164.08 THIS ORDER SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. This purchase order is considered to be a single contract. Payment will be made upon completion of total order. No partial payments will be made without proper authorization. 2. Purchase order number must appear on all invoices,packages,or correspondence. 3. The County reserves the right to cancel any portion of this order if not filled as specified. 4. Payment will be made only in accordance with this order, corrections or price adjustments must be authorized by the Purchasing Director prior to shipment of goods. 5. Defective goods will be promptly returned al your expense and credit taken. 6. Discounts of prompt payment wilt be computed from date of receipt of goods or from date of receipt of invoices, whichever is later. 7 It is agreed, that goods delivered shall comply with all federal, slate, or local laws relative thereto, and that the Vendor shall defend actions or claims brought and save harmless the buyer from loss, cost, or damage by reason of actual or alleged infrigements of letter patent. B. Unless the Vendor indicates otherwise, initiation of work shall consitute acceptance of the Purchase Order including all attachments. AAA I' 9. The Vendor agrees to reimbursement of travel expenses in accordance with Florida Statute Chapter 112.061, Per Diem and Travel Expenses of Public Officers. empl ees an14QfhGax&do&fc^^' 77 10. All shipments to be FOB Destination. JAN 13 2004 Pg._L — EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PE- 2003 -AR -4261, DOUG SCHROEDER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER, REQUESTING A PARKING EXEMPTION TO ALLOW OFF -SITE PARKING VIA A SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT, PURSUANT TO LDC §2.3.4.1.2.C., BETWEEN THE COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER AND THE PEWTER MUG. ACCESS BETWEEN THE PROPERTIES WILL BE VIA A PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY UNDER THE U.S. 41 I3RIDGE OVER THE COCOHATCHEE RIVER. THE COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER IS LOCATED AT 12345 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA OBJECTIVE: The petitioner seeks approval of a parking exemption to allow off -site parking to accommodate the parking required for an expansion of services at the existing Cocohatchee Nature Center. The off - site parking is proposed to be provided on the Pewter Mug restaurant site. CONSIDERATIONS: According to the narrative provided by the petitioner, the Cocohatchee Nature Center is planning to expand the existing operation to provide a second pontoon boat and make more kayaks available for rent. Those uses require additional parking. The subject property site is zoned "A" Agricultural with a Conditional Use to allow an eco- tourism education facility, that was granted by Resolution No. 2000 -56. Please see the attachments for copies of prior resolutions. Resolution No. 2000 -56A granted a Special Treatment Development Permit to allow the construction of the Nature Center and its ancillary facilities. The site is developed with the Cocohatchee Nature Center, which consists of an Amphitheater /Instructional building housing 980 square feet of retail space, a boardwalk parking lot and a boat dock that accommodates a 36- passenger charter boat, and canoe rentals. Resolution No. 02 -07 granted variances to lessen the required rear yard setback and a landscape buffer on January 8, 2002. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this petition will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of this variance will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth Management Plan. LACurrent0eselernTarking Exemption \Cocohatchee Nature Center, JAN 1 3 2004 AR 4261 \EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.doc Page 1 of 4 Pg ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: There are no environmental issues associated with this petition that are to be addressed as part of the parking exemption petition. Environmental issues will be addressed thru the appropriate agency via the permitting procedures necessary to construct the pedestrian walkway. HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: Staff's analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is not located within an Area of Historical and Archaeological Probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no survey or Waiver of Historic and Archaeological Survey & Assessment is required. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC did not review this petition because the EAC is not required to hear parking exemption petitions; the LDC does not mandate that level of review. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition on November 20, 2003. There were no public speakers nor was any correspondence received regarding this petition. The CCPC requested another condition be added requiring the pedestrian walkway to be lighted. Mr. Adelstein moved to forward PE- 2003 -AR -4261 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval with conditions; Mr. Schiffer seconded the motion. The CCPC voted 9 to 0 to forward the petition to the Board of Zoning Appeals with a recommendation of approval with conditions. PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed parking exemption request is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code, as conditioned by staff. Therefore, Planning Services staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PE -2003- AR -4261 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval with the following conditions: 1. The parking exemption is limited to the configuration shown on the site plan entitled "Site Plan, PE- 2003 -AR- 4261," stamped "Received July 21, 2003," except as further restricted below. This site plan is included as Exhibit A; and 2. The petitioner must construct or cause to be constructed the pedestrian walkway under the Tamiami Trail. The pedestrian walkway must be completed and operational prior to the opening of any expansion of the Cocohatchee Nature Center uses; and L: \Current \Deselem \Parking Exemption \Cocohatchee Nature Center, AR 4261 \EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.doc Page 2 of 4 No. II Z- JAN 13 2004 Pg. A —_ 3. Prior to the expansion of uses at the Nature Center, the petitioner must install signs and provide hand -outs to customers advising them of the availability of additional parking, noting where it is located and how to get to it. The signs and notices must also advise customers using the additional parking that pedestrian traffic going to and from the additional parking area must use the pedestrian crossing under the bridge. Direct crossing of 'ramiami Trail is prohibited; and 4. Employees of the Nature Center must park in the off -site parking area; and 5. The pedestrian walkway must be illuminated. The lighting facilities must be no taller than the minimum required to adequately illuminate the walkway. Lighting facilities shall be arranged in a manner that protects roadways and neighboring properties from direct glare or other interference. LACurrentTeselern Parking Exemption\Cocohatchee Nature Center, AR 42611EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.doc Page 3 of 4 JAN 13 2004 pg. 3 PREPARED BY: &d 4a- If-03 KAt D SELEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REVIEWED BY: /Z -5 RAY B OWS, L"HIIEF-P-L-ARNER DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW USAN MURRAY, AICP, INTERIM DIRECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: JOS P K. SCHMIT , ADMINIST TOR ATE CO ITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION G: \Current \Deselem \Parking Exemption \Cocohatchee Nature Center, I JAN 13 2004 AR 4261 \EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.doc Page 4 of 4 AGENDA ITEM 8 -C Co�� IL'�iier Co-r�.-K�ty MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2003 RE: PETITION: PE- 2003 -AR -4261, COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER OWNER/AGENT: Agent: Doug Schroeder, Executive Director Owner: same Cocohatchee Nature Center 12345 Tamiami Trail North Naples, FL 34110 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner seeks approval of a parking exemption to allow off -site parking to accommodate the parking required for an expansion of services at the existing Cocohatchee Nature Center. The off -site parking is proposed to be provided on the Pewter Mug restaurant site. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The Cocohatchee Nature Center is located on the west side of Tamiami Trail North (US 41), approximately two - thirds of a mile north of Immokalee Road, along the north shore of the Cocohatchee River. The Pewter Mug restaurant is directly across the street. The Cocohatchee Nature Center is located at 12345 Tamiami Trail North, in Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. The Pewter Mug restaurant is located at 12300 Tamiami Trail North in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: According to the narrative provided by the petitioner, the Cocohatchee Nature Center is planning to expand the existing operation to provide a second pontoon boat and make more kayaks available for rent. Those uses require additional parking. The subject property site is zoned "A" Agricultural with a Conditional Use to allow an eco- tourism education facility, that was granted by Resolution No. 2000- 56. Please see the attachments for copies of prior resolutions. Resolution No. 2000 -56A granted a Special Treatment Development Permit to allow the construction of the Nature Center and its ancillary facilities. The site is developed with the Cocohatchee Nature Center, which consists of an Amphitheater/Instructional building housing 980 square feet of retail space, a boardwalk parking lot and a boat dock that provides a 36- passenger charter boat, and canoe rentals. Resolution o d variances to lessen the required rear yard setback and a landscape buffer on January , 20 2. 1 ! GACurrentTeselem\Parking Exemption \Cocohatchee Nature Center, AR 4261\staff report.doc JAN 13 2004 Page 1 of 2�d� CL a w R SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: East: South: West: PM elm TW a Horse Creek, then undeveloped "A" agriculturally zoned land Tamiami Trail North, then the Pewter Mug restaurant, zoned C4 (the site that is proposed to provide the off -site parking spaces) the Cocohatchee River then undeveloped land zoned PUD, which is part of the Cocohatchee River Trust PUD that sunsetted on July 23, 2003 the Cocohatchee River, then undeveloped "A" agriculturally zoned land � I 1 FE . I +� G � K � I r T P' � M ssa w• me Excerpt from Zoning Map GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is designated Urban (Urban - Mixed Use District) on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. This Subdistrict allows residential uses, including single family; institutional uses; essential services; and, recreation and open space uses. The use is a cultural, education or recreational center and was determined as part of the conditional use approval to be consistent with the GMP. The current parking exemption request is not specifically addressed in the HISTORICJARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: The site is already developed, thus any areas of historical and archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map were addressed as part of the site development process. Therefore, no historic/archaeological survey and assessment is required for this petition. EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL, TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: to the above referenced areas of critical concern as part of the Conditional Use, Special Treatment Overlay Development Permit (Resolution Number 2000 -56A) and Variance petitions. The Transportation Planning Division reviewed the subject petition, offering no conditions to address any specific concerns. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This petition seeking a parking exemption was not heard by the EAC because the petition does not have environmental issues that require EAC review. ANALYSIS: The applicant is required to seek parking exemption approval from the BCC because: "The permitted use and the proposed off -site parking lot are separated by a collector or arterial roadway;" [LDC Section 2.3.4.11.2.c.1.(1).] The petitioner has provided a Parking Agreement that has been signed by representatives of the Cocohatchee Nature Center and the Pewter Mug restaurant. The agreement has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's office. That agreement addresses the following issues: 1. " The agreement states the hours of operation for the parking use (7 a.m. until 4:30 p.m.) and stipulates the number of spaces that will be provided at the Pewter Mug (20 spaces); and 2. The agreement is in force and effect for ten years. However if the agreement is nullified by either party prior to that date, the Nature Center is required to reduce the scope of land use(s) to that which would not require the off -site parking spaces. Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this petition and the criteria on which a determination must be based (LDC Section 2.3.4.112.c.2.). This evaluation forms the basis of the Planning Commission's recommendation, which is forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). The BCC considers the relevant information and renders a final decision regarding the request. Each criterion (from LDC Section 2.3.4.11.2.c.2., shown in italics) is reviewed below: (1) Whether the amount of off -site parking is required by LDC Section 2.3.16, or is in excess of these requirements. As noted on the site plan, the proposed expansion of the nature facility requires additional parking spaces. With the off -site parking spaces, the proposed expansion will be in compliance with Section 2.3.16. (2) The distance of the farthest parking space from the facility to be served. The proposed off -site parking is across the Tamiami Trail right -of -way. The farthest parking space is approximately 350 feet from the actual building at the Cocohatchee Nature Center. The boardwalk and the boat docks are somewhat closer to the off -site parking. (3) Pedestrian safety if the lots are separated by a collector or arterial roadway; and (4) Pedestrian and vehicular safety. The petitioner is proposing a pedestrian walkway under the Tamiami Trail. Staff is including a condition that requires the pedestrian walkway to be completed and operational prior to opening any expanded uses to the public. In addition, staff has included a condition that requires the petitioner to advise customers using the additional parking area that direct pedestrian crossing of Tsmi mi Trail is prohibited. All customers must utilize the pedestrian walkway. AGEMA rrrl (5) The character and quality of the neighborhood and the future developm t o}rxe,isix�gj /� GACurrent \Deselem \Parking Exemption \Cocohatchee Nature Center, AR 4261\staff report.doc Page 3 of 6 JAN 13 2034 8 properties. Both the parcel developed as the Nature Center and the Pewter Mug restaurant are separated from other development by water. To the south of the Pewter Mug.(across the river) is a motel. Other than that, there is no development is the nearby area. The PUD south of the nature center has sunsetted, so public hearings must be held before development within that PUD can proceed. (6) Potential parking problems for neighboring properties. As noted above, there are no other uses located nearby that might be affected by this parking exemption. The site that would most likely be affected by the parking agreement would be the Pewter Mug restaurant itself. If the parking agreement caused a parking shortage for the Pewter Mug restaurant, it is foreseeable that vehicles could try to park along the Tamiami Trail frontage. That would create an unsafe and intolerable situation. Staff does not believe there will be any conflict between the two businesses that would create a safety issue. The Pewter Mug restaurant is open between 4:30 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. The Nature Center's hours are 9:00- am. to 4:30 p.m., however a sunset boat tour is offered that utilizes one boat. One tour boat is current allowed and the parking exists to accommodate that use. The sunset tour leaves the center one hour prior to sunset. Because the sunset varies by season, the exact time of that excursion is not definitive. The sunset tour is done by reservation only and all trips are pre -paid. The sunset tour boat should not trigger the need to use off -site parking; ample parking should be available on -site. Thus there should be no conflict between the Nature Center and the Pewter Mug restaurant during the hours that both uses would be operational. Staffing at the Nature Center currently consists of four staff members - -a front desk person, a boat captain, a deckhand, and a canoe/kayak/maintenance person. If a second boat were put in operation, then the staff would be increased by two—a second captain and second deckhand. Staff has included a condition to require all staff to utilize the off -site parking area, thus freeing the on -site parking for clientele use. This condition should help ensure that there is no conflict between the between the Nature Center and the Pewter Mug restaurant (7) Whether the internal traffic flow is required to leave the site to reach the proposed off-site parking. Traffic will be required to leave this site and cross Tamiami Trail North to access the additional parking spaces at the Pewter Mug restaurant. Vehicles will be required to go south on Tamiami Trail to Shores Avenue and make a U -turn to proceed north to the Pewter Mug restaurant. This issue has been discussed with Transportation Planning Staff. The distance from the Nature Center to Shores Avenue is more than 1,000 feet, which should be ample space to allow safe maneuvering of the U -turn. A condition has been included requiring a sign to be posted at the Nature Center to notify customers where the overflow parking is located and how to get to it. (8) Whether vehicular access shall be from or onto residential streets. No residential streets will be affected by the parking exemption. Both the Cocohatchee Nature There is no residentially zoned property adjacent to either the Cocohatchee Nature 'Center or the Pewter Mug:_ restaurant. qp� Whether the off -site parking area will be used for valet parking. Valet parking is not proposed. ._ (11) Whether the off -site parking area will be used for employee parking. AGENDA ITW Staff has included a condition that requires the off -site parking area to be utilized y eWRloy (12) Whether there are more viable alternatives available. JAN 13 2004 Exemption\Cocohatchee Nature Center, AR 42611staff report.doc Page 4 of 6 Fal Due to the somewhat isolated location of the Cocohatchee Nature Center, no viable alternatives seem to be available other than prohibiting the desired expansion of the Nature Center use. 3. Off - street parking areas must be accessible from a street, alley or other public right -of -way and all off - street parking facilities must be so arranged that no motor vehicle shall have to back onto any street, excluding single-family and two-family residential dwellings and churches approved under section 2.3.16. The Tamiami Trail provides vehicular access to the off -site parking lot. The parking lot of the Pewter Mug restaurant has been designed so that motor vehicles are not required to back into the street. PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed parking exemption request is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code, as conditioned by staff. Therefore, Planning Services staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PE- 2003 -AR -4261 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval with the following conditions: 1. The parking exemption is limited to as depicted in the site plan entitled "Site Plan, PE- 2003 -AR- 4261," stamped "Received July 21, 2003," except as further restricted below. This site plan is included as Exhibit A; and 2. 1 The petitioner must construct or cause to be constructed the pedestrian walkway under the Tamiami Trail. The pedestrian walkway and associated walkway must be completed and operational prior to the opening of any expansion of the Cocohatchee Nature Center uses; and 3. Prior to the expansion of uses at the Nature Center, the petitioner must install signs and provide hand -outs to customers advising them of the availability of additional parking, noting where it is located and how to get to it. The signs and notices must also advise customers using the additional parking that pedestrian traffic going to and from the additional parking area must use the pedestrian crossing unde the bridge. Direct crossing of Tamiami Trail is prohibited; and 4. Employees of the Nature Center must park in the off -site parking area. JAN 13 2C G:\Current0eselernTarking Exemption \Cocohatchee Nature Center, AR 4261\staff report.doc Page 5 of 6 �'� PREPARED BY: 4L I/ KA PESELEM, AICP PRINCIPAL PLANNER REVIEWED BY: In -ao —C3 DATE Z?� /0 2-z- 03 RAY LLOWS, CHIEF PLANNER DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW /o /-1- d 3 USAN MURRAY, AICP, RIM DIRECTOR DAfE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: EIMITT, ADMINISTRATOR —TDATE DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION RUSSELL A. BUDD, CHAIRMAN // 1v DA E Staff report for the November 20, 2003 Collier County Planning Commission Meeting Tentatively scheduled for the January 13, 2004 Board of County Commissioners Meeting Attachments: Resolution Numbers 2002 -07, 2000 -56 and 2000 -56A JAN 13 2004 G:\Current\Deselem\Parking-Exemption\Cocohatchee Nature Center, AR 4261\staff report.doc Page 6 6 RESOLUTION 2000-5 6 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ECOTOURISM EDUCATIONAL FACILITY, CONDITIONAL USE "23" IN THE "A -ST" ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2.2.3 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67 -1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of Conditional Use "23" of Section 2.2.2.3 in an "A -ST" Zone for an ecotourism educational facility on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A ") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of Collier County, Florida that: The petition filed by Jason Williams of Johnson Engineering, Inc., representing Cocohatchee Nature Center, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit 'T" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Use "23" of Section 2.22.3 of the "A -ST" Zoning District for an ecotourism educational facility in accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "C ") and subject to the following conditions: Exhibit "D" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. -1- M JAN 13 2004 Pg. I a BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this a as day of: , ?ppp, BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: TIM O ANT NE, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: DWIGHT E..BROCK, Clerk Attest as to C►�oiii :a'� ApoVpa hn todiqrn and Legal Sufficiency:, - M i-ii M. Scuderi Assistant County Attorney `AdrrinJCU -99-31 RESOLLMOWFR/ts Pic, AIEL JAN 13 2034 CU -99-31 Legal Description DESCRIPTION: A parcel of land in the N1/2 of Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, lying within the Bulkhead Line No. 4, as recorded in Bulkhead Plat Book 1, page 16, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and the Westerly Right of Way line of U.S. Rt. 41(S.R. 45), more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of beginning of Bulkhead Line No. 4, as recorded in Bulkkhead Line Plat Book 1, Page 16, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; run S 73'4913" W, for 281.74 feet, to a point of curvature; thence run 257.08 feet along the arc of the curve, concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 100.00 feet, and subtended by a chord having a length of 191.91 feet and bearing N 32'31'58 W, to a point of_.compound curvature; thence run 420.68 feet along the arc of a curve. concave to the Southeast, having . a radius of 500.00 feet, and subtended by a chord having a length of 408.38 feet and bearing N 65'13'02" E. to the point of ending of said Bulkhead Line No. 4, said point lying on the Westerly Right of Way line of U.S. Rt. 41(S.R. 45); thence run S 0'40'47" E. along said Right of Way line, for 254.49 feet, to the Point of Beginning. EXHIBIT "B" JAN 13 2004 ,emu '.i, .fir. �•- i��•�:.; J�. �:� .'.a:. _ �� -.�'. �.^_,'e . � ��e� EXHIBIT "C" � � .•'.'tilt �s �r y , sv. J zoa4 PS• CU -99 -31 Conditions of Approval 1. Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if, during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity, an historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department shall be contacted. 2. Permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) shall be presented prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 3. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance plan for the site, with emphasis on the ST area, shall be submitted to Current Planning environmental staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 4. The Planning Services Director may approve minor changes to the site plan. EXHIBIT "D" AGENDA ITEM NO. 17 '�-- JAN 13 2004 RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -56A RELATING TO PETMON NUMBER ST -99 -2 FOR SPECIAL TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A NATURE CENTER WITH AMPHITHEATER/INSTRUCTIONAL BUILDING, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, BOARDWALK, PARKING AND DOCKS ON A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH A SPECIAL TREATMENT (ST) OVERLAY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes has conferred on Collier County, the power to establish, coordinate and enforce, toning and such business regulations as necessary for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted Ordinance 91 -102 as amended which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Commissioners, being the duly elected constituted board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after due notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of allowing the constrttcti on of a nature center with amphitheater /instructional building, administration building, boardwalk, parking and docks on a portion of the property having an "ST" overlay, as shown on the attached plan, Exhibit "A", and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement has been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and is in accordance with Section 2.2.24 of the Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Petition ST -99 -2 filed by Jason 1) Permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the Florida Department of JAN 13 I Environmental Protection (FDEP) shall be presented prior to final site Plan/construction plan approval. 2) An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance plan for the site, with emphasis on the ST area, shall be submitted to Current Planning Section staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 3) The Planning Services Director may approve minor changes to the site plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number ST -99 -2 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of- rY�CAry 2000, ATTEST: 7� G as e emu a on) pro e� as to norm and Legal Sufficienpy:.: M S Assistant County Attorney sVST Resolution BOARD OF Y COMMISSIONERS , FLORIDA Chairman AGENDA JAN 13 2004 a. 17, I ' /,ON,**\ w e \,' s '/ F c S o � I- D IRAWING INTENOW FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING ONLY. PROJECT LIMITS ,sgBl -10'f B A 612 SDICTIONAL LINE — SPECIAL TREATMENT LINE w V I EMBIT "A" COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER PROPOSED SITE PLAN IMPACT OVERLAY MAP JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC. JAN 13 2004 Pg.--Iy-- COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel of land in the N1l2 of Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, lying within the Bulkhead Line No. 4, as recorded in Bulkhead Plat Book 1, page 16, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and the Westerly Right of Way line of U.S. Rt. 41(S.R. 45),, mom particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of beginning of Bulkhead Line No. 4, as recorded in Bulkhead Line Plat Book 1, Page 16, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; tun S 7349' 13" W, for 281.74 feet, to a point of curvature; thence tun 257.08 feet along the arc of the curve, concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 100.00 feet, and subtended by a chord having a length of 19;.91 feet and bearing N 32 "31'58" W, to a point of compound curvature; thence run 420.68 feet along the arc of a curve, concave to the Southeast, having a radius of 500.00 feet, and subtended by a chord having a length of 408.38 feet and bearing N 65 °13'02 "E, to the point of ending of said Bulkhead Line No. 4, said point lying on the Westerly Right of Way line of U.S. Rt. 41 (S.R. 45); then tun S 0 °40'47" E, along said Right of Way line, for 254.49 feet, to the Point of Beginning. EXHIBIT "B" JAN 13 2004 I...;,a_ _ao RESOLUTION NO.02- 07 RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA- 2001 -AR -1207 FORA VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. r WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duty elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 30 -foot variance from the required 30 -foot rear yard setback to 0-feet and a 5 -foot landscape variance from the required 15 feet to 10 feet for a landscape buffer adjacent to Tamiami Trial North as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A ", in an "A" Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1207 filed by Doug Schroeder, representing Cocohatchee Nature Center Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit 'B" be and the same hereby is approved for a.30 -foot variance from the required 30 -foot- rear yard setback to 0-feet and a 5-foot landscape variance from the requited IS feet to 10 feet for the landscape buffer adjacent to Tamiami Trial North as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A ", of the Rural Agricultural Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: No. f % t- JAN 13 2004 ar t. Prior to approval of the Site Development Plan, the landscape plad shall indicate a hedge, five feet in height, along the southern boundary of the parcel at ground level. 2. Prior to approval of the Site Development Plan, the landscape plan shall indicate plantings (leather fem or another plant that will tolerate existing conditions) at ground level along the north property line. tan shall 3. Prior to approval of the Site Development Plan, the landscape p indicate raised planters with overhanging plants sufficent to cover such planters located at the ends of each row of parking. a. Prior to approval of the Site Development Plan, the landscape plan shall indicate building perimeter plantings a minimum of S feet in width. BE rr RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number VA- 2001 -AR -1207 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and m0oritY vote. Done this s�-,G day of 2002. ' - DWjCjHt'.E. BROCK, Clerk to CbafrM'S slgnatrn only. Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Marjori . Student Assistant County Attorney VA- 2001- AR- 1207/FPAD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COVNI Y,.O 'MA, AGENDA ITEM No.� JAN 13 2004 agi �y #a 'tit, a y 3 Ilki a4s Ili a �tL lob I n. ss 'Ir ve if z .:. b t a 1, 1' f/r a s i 11 Y 1 : 1 RN e 111 IAN 13 700 �3 PQ. 11\ 11 11 1 L Y Y� RN e IAN 13 700 �3 PQ. 1 EMML 1I)ES(IR,IIIE i !C�)N A parcel of BWA is dln Mflf9 of SeMM 91, TI map 49 Soud, RmW 23 EM Co6lBCw CM&yn Floeida, lyigaa %viWa �he SuMead Lim No. 4, u �*d in Balms Flo Bcak 1, pMe 16" Publir, R=®uds of (C006kff CoMty, Rooad&, awl ft % =,Dy DUSha of way liw Of U.S. RL 41(S.R. 45), morn PM*MlMy descai� w foll®wz: SnUm l Liam No. 4, as Mccoded ire ftMgM bium flat Book 1, Np 96, Pabgr. R@co& ®: Collier Coangy, JE; loridc run S 73049,13" W, for 281.74. feet, to a poiog of ctWV nm 957.0E feet along the are of the cunv, cowave go thc Nonhem havi* a radiva of 100.09 &M. seed subtamW by a chow having a leo& of 191.91 feet =W beam N 32031 °5i°° w, to a point of corms cWYMMM ftwe tz 4a0A &M MOM the ac of at Gee, C@W&Ve ¢o ft Soughs t, hmvim A maw of 500.00 feet, aM nbLaaded by 8 c1md 1st a km& of 4®8.32 fen aW be sane H 65913 °09 °T, 90 ate POW ofeadiM off aced M&BgM Lha g No. 4, mW pciW MATS ®a dig Wily Right Of Way line of U.S. Rt. 41(S.R. 45). d= = S 0 ®40°47°° E, &Awo said Right of Way lim, foe 954.49 feet, co t* MO of ft g. MISIT "]IS tom 1 rlF- JAN 13 2004 1 J- Re1� -= •, I APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: PARKING EXEMPTION Petition No.: Commission District: Date Petition Received: Planner Assigned: ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF 1. General Information Name of Applicant(s) Cocohatchee Nature Center Applicant's Mailing Address 12345 Tamiami Trail North City Naples State FL Zip 34110 Applicant's Telephone# 592 -1200 Fax #_ 592 -0630 E -mail info @cocohatchee.org Name of Agent Doug Schroeder Finn Executive Director of the Nature Center Agent's Mailing Address above City State Zip Agent's Telephone # 2 3 9 2 9 0 - 9 0 3 8 i3o. Fax # above Agent's E -Mail Address: doug@cocohatchee.org COLLIER COUNTY CON WUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SERVICES /CURRENT PLANNI;G 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE - NAPLES, FL 34104 PHONE (941) 403- 2400/FAX (941) 643 -6968 T Na 1 / CI JAN 13 2004 Pg. Zoning of proposed parking lot C -4 Zoning of lot the Parking Exemption is proposed to serve AG /CU - C -4 Type of land use that the parking exemption is proposed to serve AG /Cu - Restaurant Required parking for project 22 Parking Spaces Proposed Off -Site 20 Project description: (or attach separate sheet) The Cocohatchee Nature Center and the Pewter Mug intend to share parking spaces (20 at each property - see attached Joint Parking Agreement). Access between the properties will be via a pedestrian walkway under US 41 and the bridge at the Cocohatchee River -similar to the pedestrian walkway under the Gordon River Bridge connecting Tin City and Bayfront. 1. is the proposed parking lot separated from the permitted use by a collector or arterial roadway? :Yes, by US 41. However, the walkway under this arterial roadway will provide a means for crossing without compromising pedestrian safety. 2. Is the proposed parlung lot zoned commercial? Yes. 3. Does the permitted use propose to share required parking with another permitted use? No. 4. Does the petitioner propose a parking reservation? SIGNATURE OF TIONER Doug Schroeder, for the Cocohatchee Nature Center PE/rev.31MM 6/2/03 J DATE A. Jam s Reyserr for the ;Pe wte M g TE JAN 13 2004 JOINT PARKING AGREEMENT For a consideration of TEN ($10.00) DOLLARS, Cocohatchee Nature Center, Inc. (the "Nature Center") owner of the real property located at 12345 Tamiami Trail North, Naples, Florida, and A. James Keyser, owner of the real property located at 12300 Tamiami Trail North, Naples, Florida, hereby agree as follows: WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement, for their mutual benefit, intend to share parking spaces on the above - referenced properties; the property at 12300 Tamiami Trail North is leased to The Pewter Mug, Inc. (hereafter referred to as the "Pewter Mug "). Pedestrian access between the properties is to be provided by a walkway to be constructed under the Cocohatchee River Bridge and highway U.S. 41 North. A General Permit for construction of the walkway is expected to be issued to the Nature Center in November, 2003 by the Florida Department of Transportation (owner of a 150' easement between the properties). THEREFORE, the parties to this Agreement agree to share parking spaces on the above - referenced properties under the following conditions: a) Terms of Use. The Nature Center shall be allowed to use twenty (20) parking spaces at the Pewter Mug between 7:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. The Pewter Mug shall be allowed to use twenty (20) parking spaces at the Nature Center, on dates and at "- times mutually agreed upon by the Pewter Mug and the Nature Center. The hours of operation of the Pewter Mug shall be limited, during the period in which this Agreement is in effect, to between 4:30 p.m. and 2:00 a.m., Monday through Sunday. b) Right to Remove Vehicles. At the sole discretion of the Pewter Mug, vehicles belonging to Nature Center visitors remaining at the Pewter Mug after 4:30 p.m. may be towed at the expense of the vehicle owner. The Nature Center may likewise have vehicles belonging to Pewter Mug customers towed, at the expense of the vehicle owner, which are not in compliance with the dates and times mutually agreed upon by the Pewter Mug and the Nature Center. c) Hold Harmless. Both parties to this Agreement agree to hold the other harmless against any and all claims, including bodily injury or death, that may occur as the result of the use of either of the above - referenced properties by the general public under this Joint Parking Agreement. FURTHER, this Agreement shall remain in force and effect for a period of ten (10) years from the date last signed below, unless: a) either the Nature Center or the Pewter Mug ceases to exist as an operating entity, or, b) the Pewter Mug property is conveyed to a purchaser other than the Nature Center. Upon expiration of the ten year term of this Agreement, or in the event this Agreement becomes null and void prior to the full ten year term due to the occurrence of either (a) or (b) described above, the Nature Center shall immediately discontinue the uselot a �c�A tdo JAN 13 2004 Pii.�_ Joint Parldng Agreement Page 2 second tour boat and reduce rental activities to a maximum of five canoes. THIS AGREEMENT is binding on the successors and assigns of the parties and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. It is agreed that in any action required to perfect this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to a reasonable attorney's fee. Modifications, in whole or in part, may not be made without the express consent of both parties to this Agreement. Cocohatchee Nature Center, Inc., A Florida Not - For - Profit Corporation B Douglas P. Schroeder, Executive Director Dated: 'Tf 1Z, O' A. James Keyser Date AGENDA la I ,, JAN 13 2004 P9 . AT I COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER Legal Description A parcel of land in the North I-� of Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, lying within Bulkhead Line No. 4 as recorded in Bulkhead Line Plat Book 1, Page 16, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and the Westerly Right of Way line of U.S. Route 41 (S.R. 45), more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of beginning of Bulkhead Line No. 4, as recorded in Bulkhead Line Plat 1, Page 16, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; run S 73 049113" W for 281.74 feet to a point of curvature; thence run 257.08 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the Northeast having a radius of 100.00 feet and subtended by a chord having. a length of 191.91 feet and bearing N 32 031'58" W to a point of compound curvature; thence run 420.68 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the Southeast having a radius of 500.00 feet and subtended by a chord having a length of 408.38 feet and bearing N 65 013'02" E to the point of ending of said Bulkhead Line No. 4, said point lying on the Westerly Right of Way line of U.S. Route 41 (S.R. 45); thence run S 0 °40147" E along said Right of Way line for 254..09 feet to the Point of Beginning. REiC`EIVEQ AGENDA ITEM JAN 13 2004 Pa. ate_ RE- SUBMITTAL PE- 2003 -AR -4261 PROJECT #2001080020 DATE: 7/22/03 KAY DESELEM PEWTER MUG LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract or parcel of land lying in that part of the West Half (W 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, South of Horse Creek and East of the East Right -of -way line of State Road No. 45 (Tamiami Trail) which tract or parcel is descrbed as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the North line of said fraction of a section with said East right - of -way line, which point is on the center line of the original channel of Horse Creek, run South along said right -of -way line for 329.05 feet to a point on the center line of the easement right -of- way of the State Road Department for the re-locat- ed channel of Horse Creek, thence run East along said center line (perpendicular to State Road No. 45) for 100 feet, thence dflect left 17 degrees 15 minutes and continue Northeasterly for 300 feet more or less along said center line to the center line of the original channel of Horse Creek, thence run Northwesterly and Westerly along said center line of the original channel to the point of beginning; subject however to said easement right of the State Road Department over that part of the described lands lying within 87.5 feet of said center line of the relocated channel of Horse Creeks in Collier County, Florida. F�' E, V03 JAN 13 2004 P9 1:30 PE- 2003 -AR -4261 PROJECT 42001080020 DATE: 7/22/03 KAY DESELEM ADD-RESSLYG CHECKLIST Please complete the following and submit to the Addressing Section for Review. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. 1. Legal description of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) Attached 2. polio (Property ID) number(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00157240001 & 00157280003 3. Street address or addresses (as applicable, if already assigned) 12345 Tamiami Trail North Naples 4. Location map, showing exact location ofproject/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way (attach) 5. Copy of survey (NEEDED ONLY FOR UNPLATTED PROPERTIES) 6. Proposed project name (if applicable) Cocohatchee Nature Center 7. Proposed Street names (if applicable) 8. Site Development Plan Number (FOR EXISTING PROJECTS /SITES ONLY) SDP 2001 - AR1294 9. Petition Type — (Complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition Type) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ SDPI Insubstantial ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) (SDP Change) ❑ FP (Final Plat) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SIPA (SIP Amendment) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ ROW (Right -of -Way Permit) ❑ Vegetation/Exotic (Veg. Removal Permits) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) [] Land Use Petition (Variance, Conditional Use ❑ VRSFP (Veg. Removal & Site Fill Permit) Boat Dock Ext., Rezone, PUD rezone, etc.) Other - Describe: Parking Exemption — 10. Projector development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if applicable; indicate whether proposed or existing) 11. Please Check One: ❑ Checklist is to be Faxed Back ❑ Personally Picked Up 12. Applicant Name Cocohatchee Nature Center Phone 592 -1200 Fax 592 -0630 13. Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Section. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Primary Number Z 9 ZLL- Address Number Zq Z Address Number Address - Number Revised 3 -2 [ -C- l 1 JAN 13 '2 uVA pt_ 01 Date — 0 -F> PE- 2003 -AR -4261 PROJECT #2001080020 DATE: 6/18/03 KAY DESELEM 1 _ COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY (PE- 2003- AR4261) NARRATIVE Reasons for Parking Exemption RECEIVED AUG G 5 2003 PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT The Nature Center needs additional parking to operate a second pontoon boat and to make available more kayaks. These activities are not possible with existing on -site parking. Also, the Nature Center intends to construct a walkway under the Cocohatchee Bridge, providing a safer alternative for pedestrians crossing U.S. 41 North — and access to off -site parking. School Programs Currently, the Nature Center conducts field trips for school -age children aboard a single pontoon boat. In 2004, the Nature Center plans to broaden its educational activities to include programs for fifth and seventh graders attending elementary and middle schools in the North Naples area. Since the Nature Center depends, in part, on boat tour revenues from the general public to support its operations, a single boat does not provide the required flexibility to accommodate both public tours and the needs of the schools. Safety Enhancement At the present time, the only way for pedestrians to cross U.S. 41 in North Naples is at an intersection, where traffic is normally heavy. The walkway will provide a safer alternative. Pedestrians will be afforded access to both the east and west sides of U.S. 41 North, without having to walk across the roadway. Summary Approval of a Parking Exemption will provide educational programs for thousands of schoolchildren in the coming years - and make a safer crossing available for pedestrians on U.S. 41. KAY DESELEWAICP/PRINCIPAL PLANNER/CCDES /07.18.03 NO-__11 JAN 13 2034 Pa 3 A 12345 TamiamiTrail North - Naples, FL34110 TEL (239) 592 -1200 FAX (941) 592 -0630 www.cocohatchee.org Cocohaichcc Natnrc C=ta is a 501(c) (3) nonprofit organinu= Addiuoml in(oc um is aradablc Upon rcq=L --d*— Z 00 N 14 V V N N v C m y Q cV m C m m mQU x m '6 m a m U to 1 i ma mC a N I i m c o Lo. r° a I to I 1 C C,4 Q R EL Q LL U) � n I O c Y W d M C) C U C Y xaaAS o U a v N --j w N 3 14o a Y -M n 'r -, W .- I m m Z 3 m .p U_ o _ c m ca 1 U 1 <n m u in 00 N 14 V V N N v C m y Q cV m C m m mQU x m '6 m a m U to 78 C m Q fC g c0 C C m CD Q U cr m m o m a U cn ULn - Lo N ma mC a m m N N U (a Co co m m m c o Lo. r° a to � CL E C,4 N 0 x LL U) � n W LL � U C Y xaaAS O o LL N 3 14o a -M �a N CC Z O Q J N v1 W w U Z 0 CL V D O U N Q w w o O U g V a N Q N x 0 Q wFt- 000OF- a ON> >Q q W Q W Q W C Q a m f- ¢¢a¢af- N N r .- N N 78 C m Q fC g c0 C C m CD Q U cr m m o m a U cn ULn - Lo JAN 13 2004 P9. 33 N t4 N O a N m m N N U (a Co OQO CL C4 Uc co� N�; W LL U) � n C N F WW Ln xaaAS b LL v W mU a O UJ (7) f ZQ F s N w U Z U V N Q C7 ) awyww 12 Y Q N x 0 Q wFt- 000OF- ¢ a m�¢mo¢M9ML JAN 13 2004 P9. 33 COCOHIATCHEE NATURE CENTER June 2, 2003 FEpdJ , Principal Planner Collier County Planning Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Parking Exemption. Dear Fred, PE- 2003 -AR -4261 PROJECT #2001080020 DATE: 6/18/03 KAY DESELEM JUN 0 3 2003 In connection with an application by the Cocohatchee Nature Center for a parking exemption, enclosed are the requested items_ a) Application for Public Hearing for: Parking Exemption b) Addressing Checklist c) Copy of Joint Parking Agreement d) Check in the amount of $1,500.00 Should you have any questions, or if I can be of assistance in providing additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me either by e-mail (doug @cocohatchee.org) or on my cell phone at 290 -9038. Best Regards, Doug Sc eder Executive Director Na t 7In_ JAN 13 2CU04 12345 Tamiami Trail North - Naples, FL 34110 TEL (239) 592 -1200 FAX (941) 592 -0630 www.cocohatche Cocohatchee Nature Cmter is a 501(c) (3) nonprofit organization Adclitioml information is available upon requcst. COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER July 18, 2003 Kay Deselem, AICP/Principal Planner Community Development & Environmental Services Division 2800 Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: PE- 2003 -AR -4261; response to review letter dated 7/10/03. Dear Kay: RE- SUBMITTAL PE- 2003 -AR -4261 PROJECT #2001080020 DATE: 7 /22/03 KAY DESELEM RECEIVED j[11. 212003 Below are responses to the items on the above - referenced review letter: 1. A site plan for the Pewter Mug showing the parking lot affected by the proposed action (provided). 2. A site plan for the Cocohatchee Nature Center showing the parking lot and the spaces to be shared (provided). 3. The enclosed site plan for the above sites includes a highlighted area showing the walkway and how it will interconnect with the two sites. Construction of the pedestrian walkway is scheduled to begin November 1, 2003. Completion is scheduled for December 31, 2003. 4. The enclosed site plan includes a parking matrix showing "Parking Calculations (Existing)" and "Parking Calculations (w/Parking Exemption) ". 5. 1. In the event the Pewter Mug site is transferred and the nature center is not the buyer, the nature center will discontinue use of the second boat and have three fewer canoe rentals, eliminating any parking deficit. 2. The Joint Parking Agreement will be amended to include a clause limiting the hours of operation for the Pewter Mug site. NOTE: Regarding 45; 1 & 2, Asst. County Attorney Patrick White suggested the most expeditious means of addressing these items would be to incorporate them as stipulations into the Joint Parking Agreement (during the time the petition is on the agenda, prior to the hearing) where they will become law. 7. 1. Legal descriptions for the two sites are enclosed. 2. The application for parking exemption has been sent to Jim Keyser in Alabama (owner of the Pewter Mug site) for his signature. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact me at any time (cell: 290- 9038). We deeply appreciate your assistance in completing this review and working to place the nature center project on the agenda at the earliest possible date. incerely, AGENDA ITEM N0._I -max JAN 13 2004 Doug Schroeder Executive Director Pa. 3 P.S. Linda Bedtelyon is helping us with the neighborhood notice requirements for the petition. 12345 Tamiami Trail North - Naples, FL 34110 TEL (239) 592 -1200 FAX (941) 592 -0630 www.cocohatchee.org Cocobatchce Nature Center is a 501(c) (3) nonprofit "ganization AdditiorW informatim is available upon requcsL Details Page 1 of Current Ownership Folio No.11 00157280003 Property Addressli 12345 TAMIAMI TRL N Owner Name COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER INC — Addresses 12345 TAMIAMI TRL N City NAPLES �— State FL Zip 34110 - 1624 Legal 21 48 25 BEG AT POB OF tiULKNEAD LI 4,5 73DEG W 150FT, N SOFT, N 73DEG E 150FT,SALGWRNYOFUS41 Section Township Range 21 48 25 Sub No. 100 Use Code 70 INSTITUTIONAL 2003 Preliminary Tax Roll Values (Subject to change) Land Value $340--0-01 ( +) Improved Value ( =) Market Value $0.02.] $340.00 ( -) SOH Exempt Value $ 0.00 ( =) Assessed Value $ 340.00 ( -) Homestead and other Exempt Value $340.00 ( =) Taxable Value $ 0.00 Acres 0.17 Date 0312002 0212001 02/1969 wn = cave uur numes exempt value cue to cap on assessment increases. The Information is Updated Weekly. ittp:// www. collierappraiser .com/RecordDetail.asp ?FolioID= 0000000157280003 Map No. J[-3A21 't Millage Area IF 143 C Latest Sales History Book - Page C 3006-624 2780-198 335-149 Strap No. 482521 013.0003A21 13.2998 Amount $0. $ 185,000.00 $ 0.00 AGD4D IT � 140._ JAN 13 2004 I Pa. ; t 7/16/200_ uetatls Page 1 of Current Ownership Fo E — lio No. 100157240001 Property Addressil 12345 TAMIAMI TRL N Owner Name I OCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER INC Addressesil 12345 TAMIAMI TRL N F City NAPLES Statell FL 21 48 25 BEG AT PUS OF 34110-1624 Land Value —� BULKHEAD LI 4, S 73 DEG W 281.74FT, N 32 DEG W ALG CURVE 257.08FT, N 65 DEG E (_) Market Value Section Township Range Acres Map No. - -1 Strap No. 21 48 1 25 1.25 3A21 482521012.0003A21 Sub No, 100 1 Millage -r a 1�I Milla -W Use Code 70 —� INSTITUTIONAL �— 143 13.2998 2003 Preliminary Tax Roll Values Latest Sales History (Subject to change) Land Value —� $ 20,045.00 ( +) Improved Value $ 0.00 (_) Market Value $ 20,045.00 ( -) SOH Exempt Value $ 0.00 ( =) Assessed Value $ 20,045.00 ( -) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 20,045.00 (_) Taxable Value $ 0.00 = "Save Our Homes- exempt value oue to cap on assessment increases. Date Book - Page �— Amount 03 ! 2002 3006-624 �— $ 0.0( 02 ! 2001 2780-198 $ 185,000.0( The Information is Updated Weekly. ? --1__S JAN 13 2004 http:// www. collierappraiser .com/RecordDetail.asp ?FolioID= 0000000157240001 7/16/20 Division of Corporations Florida Non Profit COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER, INC. PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 12345 TAMIAMI TRAIL N. NAPLES FL 34110 US Changed 02/17/2003 MAILING ADDRESS 12345 TAMIAMI TRAIL N. NAPLES FL 34110 US Changed 02/17/2003 Document Number FEI Number Date Filed N99000006736 650951416 11/12/1999 State Status Effective Date FL ACTIVE NONE Registered Agent Name & Address SCHROEDER, BARBARA 3 12345 TAMIAMI TRAIL N. NAPLES FL 34110 AddrcssChangcd: 02/17/2003 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title SCHROEDER, BARBARA 1 12345 TAMIAMI TRAIL N. 2002 04/21/2002�:��j T NAPLES FL 34110 SCHROEDER, DOUGLAS P 12345 TAMIAMI TRAIL N. NAPLES FL 3411 D PT SCHROEDER, LISA A 12345 TAMIAMI TRAIL N.. NAPLES FL 34110 Annual Renorts Report Year Filed Date��j 2001 04/12/2001 2002 04/21/2002�:��j 2003 02117/2003 il Page I of 2 AGENDA JAN 13 2004 Pg. 3V 2003 NOT- FORS�NESS REPORT TIO UNIFORM BU DOCUMENT # N99000006736 i - •Entity Name �OHATCHEE NATURE CENTER, INC. p Place of Business 0( DRIVE NAPLES 2. Principal Place of �z S ite, Apt. fl, etc. City 8 Stat� ` ailing Add DRIVE NAPLES •34108 rosiness 3• 1AM1 TAa/t~ A. . /4-L Suite, Apt. M, etc. City b State Zip '/' Country 'l/ ►/il' �I Zip I! d 6. Name and Address of Current Registere, Country Name FILED Feb 17, 2003 8:00 am Secretary of State 02 -17- 2003 90330 017 * ** *61.25 I IIIIIIII Ill IIII! VIII hill !IIII Illll IIII! Ili!! lull (IIII (IIII IIII 11� /CHECK HERE IF MAKING CHANGES 4. FEI Number 65 0951416 J Applied For Not Applicable $8.75 Additional S. Certificate of Status Desired ❑ Fee Required 7. Name and Address of New Registered Agent SCHROEDER, BARBARA , Street Address (P.O. Box Number is Not Acceptable) Ci y ,q- 1- �r,5 �'L FL Grp '. a. The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or r istered agent, or oth, in the State of Florida. tam familiar Nth, and accept the obligations of registered agent. , :1 TA11!1 a1z4 - a� 3 IGNATURE v w w ad — OAIL Sgnatve. typed a DrWb ^Y^° o� istered epeM and f tb it appiicsDb. (NOTE: FlepisteroC Apen1 siOroMS reau.e0 when reinWatinOl 9. Election Campaign Financing $5.00 May Be Make Check Payable to FILE NbWYJ FEE IS $51.25 Trust Fund Contribution. ❑ Added to Fees Florida Department of State NAME SCHROEDER, DOUGLAS P NAB I y3,L�� TRtit M ! 7 STREET ZIP T STREET ADDRESS cm -s1 -ZIP 944A8• _ CITY-S7- T ❑ Delete TITLE CffChange ❑ Additiol TITLE NAME SCHROEDER, LISA A STREET AD tn r 4*1 IMF STREET ADDRESS CITY-ST-ZIP �+ ( tom' S /! d CITY -ST -ZIP ❑ , ❑Change ❑ Addilio Detele TITLE TITLE NAME NAME STREET ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS CITY -Si -DP CITY- ST -ZIP TITLE El Delete TITLE AcEND� ❑ Change AddNl[ NAME NAME STREET ADDRESS STAEFT ADDRESS CITY- S7•ZIP CITY-ST -ZIP ❑ Change ❑ Additit JAM- I IITZE ❑Delete TITLE AE NAP* TR E .BEET ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS Pa• —� C r CITY -Si -ZIP ITY-ST • ZIP 12. 1 hereby certify that the information supplied with this filing does not quality for the exemption staled in Section 114.07(3)(i), Florida Statutes. I lurther certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that 1 am an officer or directs of the corporation or th e empowered to execfi l this report as reggq��t►tfired by Chapter 617, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears in Block 10 or Block 11 changed, or on an atta t an ddress, y�fl� all other limpowered. ^aw^ �t ASi 1 /r /.IIflN° ti'7 d 1/ n 11►fyA //n .4i1 .� .t /� -sy' -. _.J?�e. OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS 1 11. A ADDITIONS /CHANGES TO OFFICERS AND DIRECT RS IN 10 10. t ❑ Delete t1 . Change ❑ Addition TITLE NAME S u�A rip � � pp. ❑ ADDRESS y y3 r % AM t A-/ i 7RR 1 L STREETADORESS C STREET A CITY -ST -ZIP t t' Change ❑ Addidor PT Q Delee T TITLE TITLE P lietalls Current Ownership Folio No.11 00157560008 Property Address 12300 TAMIAMI TRL N Page 1 of 1 Owner Namell KEYSER, A JAMES Addressesil 12300 TAMIAMI TRL N �— Cityll NAPLES LSjtajtq FL Zip 34110 -1628 Legal 22 48 25 PARCEL IN W1/2 OF SW1 /4 OF NW114 S OF HORSE CREEK + E OF R/W DESC IN OR 63 PG 432 & OR 48 PG 252, 'For more than four lines of Legal Description please call the Property Appraiser's Office. Section 22 Township 48 Range 25 Acres L Map No. Strap No. 1.11 3122 482522 002.0003122 Sub No. 100 ( +) Improved Value u° Millage Area i1 Mill -91 Use Code 21 IMPROVED COMMERCIAL 143 13.2998 2003 Preliminary Tax Roll Values (Subject to change) Land Value $ 674,800.00 ( +) Improved Value $ 276,460.00 ( =) Market Value $ 951,260.00 ( -) SOH Exempt Value $ 0.00 ( =) Assessed Value $ 951,260.00 { -) Homestead and other Exempt Value $ 0.00 ( =) Taxable Value I $ 951,260.00 buH = "Save Uur homes" exempt value oue to cap on assessment increases. Latest Sales History Date 11 Book -Page Amount The Information is Updated Weekly. JAN 13 2004 P!i•�— http:// www. collierappraiser .com/RecordDetail.asp ?FolioID= 0000000157560008 10/15/2003 Division of Corporations Florida Profit THE PEWTER MUG, INC. . PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 12300 NORTH TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES FL 34110 US Changed 02/24/1998 MAILING ADDRESS 12300 NO TAMIAMI TR NAPLES FL 34110 US Changed 02/24/1998 Document Number FE1 Number., Date Filed 591137 591276753 10/25/1978 State Status Effective Date FL ACTIVE NONE Last Event Event Date Filed Event Effective Date NAME CHANGE AMENDMENT 06/09/1980 NONE Keglsterect Agent Name & Address THERIAULT, ARTHUR 5925 12TH AVENUE NORTHWEST NAPLES FL 34109 Name Changed: 021088001 Address Changed: 02/08/2001 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title THERIAULT, ARTHUR R. 5925 -12TH AVE N.W. P NAPLES FL 34109 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2001 02/08 12001 2002 03/24/2002 2003 -- 01!08 /2003 Page 1 of 2 AGENDA M JAN 13 2. P 2003 FOR PROFIT CORPORATION FILED UNIFORM BUSINESS REPORT (UBR) Jan 08, 2003 8:00 am DOCUMENT # 591137 Secretary of State 1. Entity Name THE PEWTER MUG, INC. z `' 01 -08 -2003 90087 024 * * *1 50.00 Principal Place of Business Mailing Address 12300 NORTH TAM1AMI TRAIL 1230D NO TAAIIAMI TR NAPLES FL 34110 NAPLES FL 34110 us us I II II II IIIII IIII I {11111111111111 IN 1 ❑ CHECK HERE IF MAKING CHANGES 2. Principal Place of Business 3. Mailing Address Suite, Apt. N, etc. Suite, Apt. M, etc. City & Stale City & State 4. FEI Number 59-1276753 Applied For Not Applicable' Zip Country Zip Country 5. Certificate of Status Desired ❑ $8.75 Additional Fee Required 6. Name and Address of Current Registered Agent 7. Name and Address of New Registered Agent- Name Street Address (P.O. Box Number is Not Acceptable) 5925 12TH AVENUE NORTHWEST NAPLES FL 34109 r City FL Zip Code B. Th$ above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida. I am familiar with, and accept the obligations of registered agent. SIGNATURE SVfWrrrs. WOW or O^nt d rams d re(jetesd agsm end tab of appheable. (NOTE: Regained Agent apruturs regUUed re"WIM) DATE FILE NOW III FEE IS $150.00 S. Election Campaign Financing May Be After May 1, 2003 Fee will be $550.00 Test Fund Contribution. ❑ Added to Fees Added t Make Check Payable to Florida Department of State 10, OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS 11. ADDITIONS /CHANGES TO OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS IN 11 TITLE P ❑ Delete TITLE ❑ Change ❑ Addition ,DAME THERIAULT, ARTHUR R. NAME STREET ADDRESS 5925.12TH AVE N.W. STREET ADDRESS CTTY- ST -ZrP NAPLES FL 34109 CITY -ST -ZIP TITLE ❑ Delete TITLE ❑ Change ❑ Addition NAME NAME STREET ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS CITY - ST- ZIP CITY- ST- ZIP TITLE ❑ Delete TITLE ❑ Change ❑ Addition NAME NAME STREET ADDRESS STREET ADD AM Do- ST-ZIP - _ - CITY-ST -ZIP TITLE ❑ Delete TITLE ❑ Change ❑ Addition NAME MME STREET ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS CITY -ST- ZIP DTtY- ST -ZIP TITLE ❑ Delete TITLE AGENDA ITW ❑ Change ❑ Addi(*R NAME NAME 1 %1 STREET ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS No' Cl"-ST-ZIP CITY- ST-ZDP TITLE ❑ Delete TIILE jAN 13 LUU4 f ❑ Change ❑ Addition kAME STREET ADDRESS NAME STREET ADDRESS p� CITY -ST• ZIP YNx' ,i.'s• CITY - ST - ZIP 6 12. 1 hereby certify that the information supplied with this filing does not quality for the exemption staled in Section 119.07(3)(1), Florida Statutes. I further certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under oath; that I am an officer or director of the corporation or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 607, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears in Block 10 or Block 11 it changed, or on an attachment with an address, with all other like empowered. _ 23y ° SIGNATURE.wpfP° r�?° '?�" ° ",- PETITION NAME:t�;.t3 /fie e_ ; Aa��- PROJECT #: Planner: XA V L t: Si; t e ryl --r PETITION SUMMARY CHECKLIST "" Drive /Current/Application Forms/Petition Review Page -opy on Tan Paper AGENDA JAN 13 ZOOM Pa.� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT November 22, 2002 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 Mr. Doug Schroeder, President Cocohatchee Nature Center 823 Tanbark Drive, Suite 201 Naples, FL 34108 RE: Letter of 11/20/02 Request for Insubstantial Change; SDP - 2001 -AR -1294 Dear Mr. Schroeder: In response to your inquiry in the letter noted above, you need to seek Parking Exemption approval pursuant to LDC Section 2.3.4.11.2.c. Because the property with which you wish to share parking is separated from your site by US 41, the proposal would require Board of County Commissioners approval, via the submission of a completed "Off -Site Parking Application for Both Administrative and Board of Zoning Appeals Determination." There is a fee for this application that would need to be paid. Prior to the submission of an application, you should request a Pre - Application Meeting. In addition, please be aware that there are Public Information requirements that would need to be met. You may wish to review any other zoning actions that have been approved for this property, i.e., conditional uses and variances, to ensure that the proposal would not be contrary to conditions or site plan commitments of those actions before pursuing additional action. Please be aware that staff s support of a proposal to allow required parking to be provided across US 41 is extremely doubtful. You however, have the right to pursue the action if you so desire. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Kay Deselem, AICP Principal Planner Planning Services Department cc: Susan Murray, AICP, Current Planning Manager Greg Garcia, Transportation Planning — �--� -� Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator JAN 13 2004 SDP file G:\Current\Deseiem\SDP Reviews \Cocohatchee Nature Center\letter to Doug Schroeder 11- 22- 02.doc Phone (941) 403 -2400 Fax (941) 643 -6968 www.colliergov.net ADDENDUM Current Parking Requirements: RETAIL CHARTER "r CANOE RENTALS USE TOTAL COUNT 980 SF 36 PA.SS94GERS 5 CANOE RENTALS 1 SPACE/3 1 SPAC£/CIWO EE RAT10 1 SPAW250 SF PASSENGERS RENTAL 4 12 5 REOWRED SPACES -- PRONGED SPACES REOUIRED H/C PROV10ED H/C TOTAL SPACES r Revised Parking Requirements: 21 11 1 22 RECEIVED mnV 2 1 2002 Planning SerACes 36 3'6 1 1 CHARTER BOAT CANOE RENTALS RETAIL USE 980 sr 4 4 PASSENGERS 17 CANOE RENTALS Tom COUNT _ I SPACEf CANOIE RAW 1 SPAC&1250 SF PAS RENIAL REOWRED SPACES 4 15 17 PROM= SPACES RME#RE0 H/C PROWDED H/C TOTAL SPACES 36 3'6 1 1 SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT Naples Patio and Cocohatchee Nature Center intend to work together in support of environmental education programs for schoolchildren and to increase, exposure and sales for products at Naples Patio. f Fifteen parking spaces at the Naples Patio stom'located at 11935 Tamiami Trail North will be made avaihble to the nature center upon its opening (see below). may/ f The nature center will utilize its member base, direct mailings and special events to promote the Naples Patio fine of products to area residents and visitors. This agreement wiU remain in effect until cancelled by Naples Patio or the nature center with forty -five days notice. Naples Patio By: Title• Date: Parking Data - Riverbend Center Total floor area, 18,026 Total parking spaces 78 Naples Patio Door area 6,000 % of total in # of parking Spaces assigned to Naples Patio (M x.34) 26 # of spaces required by Code: 6,006 sq. R divided by 600 (one space per 600 sq. h) 10 Handicap space 1 Total -11 # of spaces available for nature center overflow parking* 15 *In excess of Code regmremeat Cecohatchee Nature Center By: L,—� Title: 1' 1q ¢4 Date: / t , / � f O z'- RECEIVED IV % 1 7.002 Planning Services �yo r 7 6iSe- S/ (o AGENDA ITEM No. _4'L_ JAN 13 2004 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Community Development and Environmental Services Division Planning Services Department - 2800 North Horseshoe Drive - Naples, Florida 34104 September 11, 2003 Mr. Doug Schroeder, Executive Director Cocohatchee Nature Center 12345 Tamiami Trail N Naples, FL 34110 RE: PE- 2003 -AR -4261- COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER Dear Mr. Schroeder: r The following comments are provided to you regarding the above referenced project. The project will retain a "HOLD" status until all comments are satisfied. 1. Patrick White, assistance county attorney, has revised the joint parking agreement. That document was forwarded to you in an e-mail message on 9/11/03. Please execute the document and resubmit it. 2. Please provide the authorization from Pewter Mug. Your 7/18/03 letter indicated that you have sent something to Jim Keyser for signature. The project cannot go forward until that document has been submitted. 3. Please provide documentation to show compliance with LDC Section 2.7.3.5, requiring notification of adjacent property owners. As mentioned in the July 10, 2003 review letter, you need to contact Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator at 213 -2948 to ensure compliance with neighborhood notice requirements for this petition. Additional comments and stipulations may be forthcoming once a complete application has been submitted for review. Please make all resubmittals through Current Planning, with the appropriate number of copies provided. If you have any questions, please contact me at (239) 403 -2400 or by e-mail. Sincerely, A A rTW Kay Deselem, AICP Principal Planner cc: via e-mail JAN 13 2004 Patrick G. White, Asst. County Attorney Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator Pg._ GACurrentTeselern Parking Exemption\Cocohatchee Nature Center, AR 426112nd review letter 9- 11- 03.doc C o f ♦ l 7 i e r C o H n t y DL.....0 PION AM-1ann Fax (239) 643 -6969 www.colliereov.net July 10, 2003 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Community Development and Environmental Services Division Planning Services Department • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive •Naples, Florida 34104 Mr. Doug Schroeder, Executive Director Cocohatchee Nature Center 12345 Tamiami Trail N Naples, FL 34110 RE: PE- 2003 -AR -4261 - COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER Dear Mr. Schroeder: The following comments are provided "to you regarding the above referenced project. If you have questions, please contact the appropriate staff member who conducted the review. The project will retain a "HOLD" status until all comments are satisfied. 1. Please provide site plans for the Pewter Mug to show the parking lot that will be affected by the proposed action. 2. Please provide a site plan for the Cocohatchee Nature Center to show the parking lot and which spaces will be shared. 3. Please provide a timetable for the construction of the pedestrian walkway, along with a conceptual site plan that shows this walkway and how it will interconnect with the two sites. 4. Please provide more information about the required parking. The application indicates that 22 spaces would be required. Upon what is this figure based? Please provide a conceptual site plan that includes a parking space matrix. 5. COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT: 1. Staff has concerns that the agreement does not "run with the land" for the Pewter Mug site. The clause included in the agreement is not binding upon future owners, thus the Nature Center could be left with a parking deficit at anytime. Please address this concern. 2. What assurances does the county have to ensure that the parking needs for the two sites will not conflict? The parking agreement does not limit the hours of operation for the Pewter Mug site. If demands occur at the same time, a parking deficit could occur, which may not be in the best interest of the public safety. 3. County Attorney staff is reviewing the proposed agreement. Further comments may be offered. 6. POSSIBLE STIPULATIONS FOR APPROVAL: Until a more comprehensive site plan is provided, and details are provided about the proposed walkway, staff cannot formulate a formal position regarding this petition or specific conditions that may be appropriate. AGENDA JAN 13 2U ,4 1st review letter 7- 10- 03.doc Page 1 of 2 g c o r r L Y PQ•� Letter to Mr. Doug Schroeder RE: Cocohatchee Nature Center Parking Exemption; PE- 2003 -AR -4261 July 10, 2003 7. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS 1. The county attorney's office has opined that you must provide legal description for both parcels - -the Cocohatchee Nature Center and the Pewter Mug. 2. Similarly, the county attorney's office has opined that you must provide authorization from both property owners. Additional comments and stipulations may be forthcoming once a complete application has been submitted for review. Please make all resubmittals through Current Planning, with the appropriate number of copies provided. Per LDC Section 2.7.2.3.5, please contact Linda Bedtelyon, Community Planning Coordinator at 213 -2948 to ensure compliance with neighborhood notice requirements for this petition. If you have any questions, please contact me at (239) 403 -2400 or by e-mail. Sincerely, 1�� X�-AJ441t� Kay Deselem, AICP Principal Planner cc: via e-mail Patrick G. White, Asst. County Attorney Linda Bedtelyon, Cmunty. Ping. Coordinator 1st review letter 7- 10- 03.doc Page 2 of 2 AGEMA ITEM Ido. JAN 13 2004 P9.— Al q_ RESOLUTION NO. 04- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER PE- 2003 -AR -4261 FOR A PARKING EXEMPTION TO ALLOW OFF -SITE PARKING VIA A SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT, PURSUANT TO LDC SECTION 2.3.4.112.0 BETWEEN THE COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER AND THE PEWTER MUG ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public, and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted its Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance No. 91 -102, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the allowance of a parking exemption; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted board for Collier County which includes the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice and has considered the advisability of a parking exemption as shown on the attached Site Plan, Exhibit "A," in the "A -ST" Zone and in the C -4 Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.3.4.11, of the Collier County Land Development Code, for the unincorporated area of Collier County, and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The petition, PE- 2003 -AR -4261, filed by Doug Schroeder, Executive Director of Cocohatchee Nature Center, representing Cocohatchee Nature Center, requesting a parking exemption to allow off -site parking via a shared parking agreement, pursuant to LDC Section 2.3.4.1.2.c, between the Cocohatchee Nature Center and the Pewter Mug, with respect to the property hereinafter described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein be and the same hereby is approved for a parking exemption as shown on the attached Site Plan, Exhibit "A," of the C -4 Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the Joint Parking Agreement attached as Exhibit "C" and incorporated by reference. Page 1 of 2 1 JAN 13 2004 Pg '110 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number PE -2003- AR -4261 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK DEPUTY CLERK Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: 1�4A4� Patrick G. White Assistant County Attorney 04FA!, BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA M , CHAIRMAN Exhibits: A. Site Plan, stamped 'Received July 22, 2003" B. Legal Description for both parcels C. Joint Parking Agreement, stamped 'Received September 16, 2003" D. Conditions JAN 13 2004 Page 2 of 2 - Z R V N N v N C m N m m W C W m U LL m c A n yU(n Unr n N N � N Ra mL a c� `m m c m c o m o tam n a NM C�D�N E 0 x W LL C U) Y N N a LL 10 CL (n LL R V Z O J W Q UJ v z wvai �v O �o�oa C7 V aW wy Y 000 0J Q �O 00CU) a �f- ¢¢aw aaca►- N N r N C m m¢U Q m c cc CL to 0 CD U Lo r uo PE -20( I N N N O f0 d N 0 � O m O N N C Co c9 Q O t a T N O Uw m r r a lV W LL w N aaAaG q _ LL U W c0 a m ac0� z O J co W U 4 (n J F- V = W (!al = U 00 00 oLt Z 8 aw LU JO(n_2 —J W9F-0000►a- Exhibit A Site Plan )3 -AR -4261 JAN 13 21.4 F:• 5'A 1 N t 1 1 m 1 i en iv 1 O w °o CIA 0 1 1 � a r w e.( �% p 1 m 1 U n v !` N 1 a _x a n LU IL 1 ° a 1 1 0 m U m 1 i CO = i cnn R V N N v N C m N m m W C W m U LL m c A n yU(n Unr n N N � N Ra mL a c� `m m c m c o m o tam n a NM C�D�N E 0 x W LL C U) Y N N a LL 10 CL (n LL R V Z O J W Q UJ v z wvai �v O �o�oa C7 V aW wy Y 000 0J Q �O 00CU) a �f- ¢¢aw aaca►- N N r N C m m¢U Q m c cc CL to 0 CD U Lo r uo PE -20( I N N N O f0 d N 0 � O m O N N C Co c9 Q O t a T N O Uw m r r a lV W LL w N aaAaG q _ LL U W c0 a m ac0� z O J co W U 4 (n J F- V = W (!al = U 00 00 oLt Z 8 aw LU JO(n_2 —J W9F-0000►a- Exhibit A Site Plan )3 -AR -4261 JAN 13 21.4 F:• 5'A COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER Legal Description A parcel of land in the North 'I of Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, lying within Bulkhead Line No. 4 as recorded in Bulkhead Line Plat Book 1, Page 16, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and the iesterly Right of Way line of U.S. Route 41 (S.R. 45) , more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of beginning of Bulkhead Line No. 4, as recorded in Bulkhead Line Plat 11? Page 16, Public Records of Collier County,'Florida; run S 73 °49113" W for 281.74 feet to a point of curvature; thence run 257.08 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the .Northeast having a radius of 100.00 feet and subtended by a chord having*a length of 191.91 feet and bearing N 32 °31158" W to a point of compound curvature; thence run 420.68 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the Southeast having a radius of 500.00 feet and subtended by a chord having a length of 408.38 feet and bearing N 65 °13102" E to the point of ending of said Bulkhead Line No. 4, -said point lying on the Westerly Right of m Way line of U.S.- Route 41 (S.R. 45) ; thence run S 0 °40' 47" E along said Right of Way line for 254:'09 feet to the Point of Beginning. RECEIVED JUL 2 i 2003 Exhibit B Legal Description Page 1of2 PE- 2003 -AR -4261 RE- SUBMITTAL PE- 2003 -AR -4261 PROJECT #2001080020 DATE: 7/22/03 KAY DESELEM m PEWTER MUG LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract or parcel of land lying in that part of the West Half (W 1/2) of the Southwest. Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, South of Horse Creek and East of the East Right -of -way line of State Road No. 45 (Tamiami Trail) which tract or parcel is descrbed as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the North line of said fraction of a section with said East right - of -way line, which point is on the center line of the original channel of Horse Creek, run South along said right-of-way line for 329.05 feet to a point on the center line of the easement right -of- way of the State Road Department for the re- locat- ed channel'of Horse Creek, thence run East along said center fine (perpendicular to State Road No. 45) for 100 feet, thence deflect left 17 degrees 15 minutes and continue Northeasterly for 300 feet more or less along said center line to the center line of the original channel of Horse Creek, thence run Northwesterly and Westerly along said center line of the original channel to the point of beginning; subject however to said easement right of the State Road Department over that part of the described lands lying within 87.5 _feet of said center line of the relocated channel of Horse Creek; in Collier County, Florida. RECEIVED JUL Z 1, 2003 Exhibit B Legal Description Page 2 of 2 PE- 2003 -AR -4261 No. 17� PE- 2003 -AR -4261 PROJECT #2001080020 JAN 13 2004 DATE: 7/22/03 KAY DESELEM pg. JOINT PARKING AGREEMENT For a consideration of TEN ($10.00) DOLLARS, Cocohatchee Nature Center, Inc. (the "Nature Center") owner of the real property located at 12345 Tamiami Trail North, Naples, Florida, and A. James Keyser, owner of the real property located. at 12300 Tamiami Trail North, Naples, Florida, hereby agree as follows: . WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement, for their mutual benefit, intend to share parking spaces on the above- referenced properties; the a pthe up�ewatte12300 p ��nT,an aNccess is leased to The pewter Mug, Inc. (hereafter referred between the properties is to be provided by a walkway to be constructed under the Cocohatchee River Bridge and highway U.S. 41 North. A General Permit for construction of the walkway's 2003 by the Florida Department of expected to be issued r of ae150 'eeasement in between the properties). Transportation the parties to this Agreement agree to share parking spaces on the above - referenced properties under the following conditions: a) Terms of Use. The Nature Center shall be allowed to use twenty (20) parking spaces at the Pewter Mug between 7:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. The Pewter Mug shall be allowed to use twenty (20) parking spaces at the Nature Center, on dates and at times mutually agreed upon by the Pewter Mug and the Nature Center. The hours of operation of the Pewter tMug between �dr2 00 a.m., Monday which Sunday. Agreement is in effect, b) Ric�.ht to Remove Vehicles. At the sole discretion of the Pewter Mug, vehicles belonging to Nature Center visitors remaining at the Pewter Mug after 4:30 p.m. may be towed at the expense of the u��stom ar•t w� at the e�xpnense of the likewise ehicle�ve vehicles belonging to Pewter g owner, which are not in compliance with the dates and times mutually agreed upon by the Pewter Mug and the Nature Center. c) Hold Harmless. Both parties to this Agreement agree to hold the other harmless against any and all claims, including bodily injury or death, that may occur as the result of the use of either of the above- referenced properties by the general public under this Joint Parking Agreement. FURTHER, this Agreement shall remain in force and effect for e Center or the Pewter 10) years from the date last signed below, unless: a) either property Mug ceases to exist as an operating entity, or, b) the Pewter Mu g is conveyed to a purchaser other than the Nature Center. Upon expiration of the ten year term of this Agreement, or in the event this Agreement becomes null and void prior to the full ten year term due to the occurrence of either e(the use of a Exhibit C described above, the Nature Center shall* n it Parking Agreement Page 1 of z PE- 2003 -AR -4261 Joint Parking Agreement Page 2 second tour boat' and reduce rental activities to a' maximum of five canoes. THIS AGREEMENT is binding on the successors and assigns of the parties and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. It is agreed that in any action required to perfect this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to a reasonable attorney's fee. Modifications, in whole or in part, may not be made without the express consent of both parties to this Agreement. Cocohatchee Nature Center, Inc., A Florida Not - For -Profit Corporation B Douglas P. Schroeder, Executive Director Dated: C7,- 1:7,-, 03 A James Keyser DaU Exhibit C Joint Parking Agreement Page 2of2 PE- 2003 -AR -4261 JAN 13 2004 COCOHATCHEE NATURE CENTER PARKING EXEMPTION 1. The parking exemption is limited to the configuration shown on the site plan entitled "Site Plan, PE- 2003 -AR- 4261," stamped 'Received July 21, 2003," except as further restricted below. This site plan is included as Exhibit A; and 2. The petitioner must construct or cause to be constructed the pedestrian walkway under the Tamiami Trail. The pedestrian walkway must be completed and operational prior to the opening of any expansion of the Cocohatchee Nature Center uses; and 3. Prior to the expansion of uses at the Nature Center, the petitioner must install signs and provide hand -outs to customers advising them of the availability of additional parking, noting where it is located and how to get to it. The signs and notices must also advise customers using the additional parking that pedestrian traffic going to and from the additional parking area must use the pedestrian crossing under the bridge. Direct crossing of Tamiami Trail is prohibited; and 4. Employees of the Nature Center must park in the off -site parking area; and 5. The pedestrian walkway must be illuminated. The lighting facilities must be no taller than the minimum required to adequately illuminate the walkway. Lighting facilities shall be arranged in a manner that protects roadways and neighboring properties from direct glare or other interference. Revised: 12/04/03 to reflect changes requested by the Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA ITEM, No.-- �-�-�`_ JAN 13 Conditions of Approval Exhibit D PE- 2003 -AR -4261 AGENDA CHANGES BOARD O COUNTY OMM SS 1 O ME RS' ME January 13 2004 ETING Continue Item 10F to JanuarV 27 2004 BCC meet! n : To a a 50 -acre parcel of land located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Goodlette -Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway fort approve the purchase of drainage improvements, transportation improvements of providing for protection. (Staff request.) environmental Add On Item 12A: Recommendation that the Board consider and reject A Plantiffs' attempt to alter terms of the settlement agreement between A u Plaintiffs and individual Commissioner defendants after the fact, quapoe extent County funds are at issue. (Staff request.) t a q t least to the aport Withdraw Item 16A1: Request to grant final approval drainage, water and sewer improvements for the nal plat of "Habitat Hab tat Villa e" roadway and drainage improvements will or privately plat of "' roadway (private), sewer imp rovements will be maintained b Collier County. fined, the water and y y (Staff request.) Move Item 16C6 to 10G: Approve a Tourist Development Category Renourishment/Maintenance Grant Application, a budget amendment a Engineering Services Work Order to seek modification to the �� Beach of Environmental Protection Permit for maintenance dredging of and an Project 90522, in the amount of $15,000. (Commissioner Florida Department 9 g Wiggins Pass, oner Halas request.) Move Item 16E4 to 10H: Approval of a resolution granting limited settlement authority to the Risk Management Director under the County's Property, Casualty and Workers' Compensation Insurance Programs. (Commissioner Coyle ) . re Uest q st TIME CERTAIN ITEMS: Item 9F to be heard at 10:30 a.m. Intent to motion to obtain Board reconsid on usage of Federal Aviation Grants. eration Item 10A to be heard at 11:00 a.m. Discussion of access to Eatonwood Lan and Livingston Road from the Hiwasse property, located at the northeast corner Livingston Road and Eatonwood Lane, east of Kensington Park PUD, in Se of 13, Township 49 south, Range 25 east. coon Item 10B to be heard immediate) followin Item 10E: Receive an update an Provide input for the County Road 951 Project Development and Environment (PD &E) Study, from Immokalee Road to Alico Road in Collier and Lee Count' Item 10E to be heard at 1:00 .m, Counties. Authorize the expenditure of budgeted funds for the development of Best Friend Park.