Agenda 12/12/2017 Item #17E12/12/2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing
be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an
Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 05-59, as amended, the Sabal Bay Mixed Use Planned Unit
Development (MPUD), to approve an insubstantial change to the MPUD to add one new deviation
relating to signage, and providing for an effective date. The subject property is located on the south
side of Tamiami Trail East, approximately one quarter mile east of Thomasson Drive, in Section 19,
Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of ±4.34 acres. [PDI -
PL20170000247]
OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) approve an ordinance amending
Ordinance Number 05-59, as amended, the Sabal Bay MPUD, to affirm an insubstantial change to the
MPUD approved by the Hearing Examiner (HEX).
CONSIDERATIONS: The petitioner is proposing to add one sign deviation to this 2,426± acre MPUD
that was originally approved on November 15, 2005. The original PUD (Ordinance Number 05 -59),
approved deviations 1 through 8, and a subsequent PUD Amendment (Ordinance Number 12-12)
approved deviations 9 through 15. The current proposed insubstantial change amendment seeks to
approve what would become Deviation #16.
The PUD is 2,426.08 acres in size and allows for up to 1,999 dwelling on 1,585 acres as well as several
other non-residential uses, include some 75 acres of commercial development allowing up to 200,000
square feet of retail, 60,000 square feet of office and 250 hotel rooms. The commercial development is
primarily located along the U.S. 41 frontage (Tracts CO1, CO2, and CO3, depicted on the PUD master
plan). All of the commercial tracts have been platted (Sabal Bay Commercial Tract). PUD Tract CO1 is
fully developed. Tract CO2 is partially developed. Tract CO3 has one outparcel developed.
This request, if approved would allow a third directory sign for the MPUD that would be lo cated on US
41 at the entrance to the commercial tract identified as CO3 on the PUD Master Plan. Section 5.06.04 F.3
of the Land Development Code allows only one directory sign at one entrance on each public street for
this development. There is currently one directory sign on US 41 and one on Thomasson Drive.
Therefore, the deviation is necessary in order to allow a second directory sign on US 41.
FISCAL IMPACT: The PDI application by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County.
There is no guarantee that the project, at build out, will maximize its authorized level of development,
however, if the PDI is approved, a portion of the land could be developed and the new development will
result in an impact on Collier County public facilities.
The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of
each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the
Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain adopted Level of
Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency
management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to
pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with
Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of
a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by
application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements.
Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the
HEX to analyze this petition.
12/12/2017
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): Because
this application is not adding uses or increasing the intensity of the previously approved uses in the
MPUD, it is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan. See
Attachment 2 of the CCPC Staff Report for the complete report from Comprehensive Planning staff.
Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes to the
MPUD Documents. Signs are not addressed in the Transportation Element; therefore, there is no issue
with consistency.
Conservation and Coastal Management (CCME) Element: Environmental staff has evaluated the
proposed change to the MPUD documents. Signs are not addressed in the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element (CCME); therefore, there is no issue with consistency with that Element of the
GMP.
COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION: The HEX heard petition
PDI-PL20170000247 on October 10, 2017 and approved an insubstantial change to the Sabal Bay
MPUD. Because no letters of objection have been received, this petition has been placed on the
Summary Agenda.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is an insubstantial change amendment to the existing Sabal Bay
MPUD (Ordinance No. 05-59, as amended). Pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.13 E.2 and Chapter 3,
Section G.3 of the Administrative Code for Land Development, the Planning Commission or the Hearing
Examiner is the final decision maker for insubstantial change applications. The BCC, on June 13, 2017
directed staff to bring insubstantial changes to Planned Unit Developments to the Board of County
Commissioners for affirmation of the approving CCPC Resolution/HEX Decision in order to amend the
PUD Ordinance accordingly. The Hearing Examiner was guided in his decision by the criteria stated in
Section 10.02.13.E.2 of the LDC: “An insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance shall be based
upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 [criteria for subst antial changes] and shall … be
based on the findings and criteria used for the original application ….” This item has been approved as to
form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (SAS)
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board affirm the Hearing Examiner decision, and
approve an ordinance to amend the Sabal Bay MPUD, Ordinance No. 05-59, as amended, for PDI-
PL20170000444.
Prepared by: Kay Deselem, Principal Planner, AICP, Zoning Division
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. Staff Report with Attachments (PDF)
2. Application & Back up (PDF)
3. HEX 2017-27 Sabal Bay PDI (signs) (PDF)
4. Ordinance - 101717(2) (PDF)
5. Legal Ad - Agenda ID 3935 (PDF)
12/12/2017
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 17.E
Doc ID: 3935
Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.
Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to
approve Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 05-59, as amended, the Sabal Bay Mixed Use Planned Unit
Development (MPUD), to approve an insubstantial change to the MPUD to add one new deviation
relating to signage, and providing for an effective date. The subject property is located on the south side
of Tamiami Trail East, approximately one quarter mile east of Thomasson Drive, in Section 19, Township
50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of ±4.34 acres. [PDI-PL20170000247]
Meeting Date: 12/12/2017
Prepared by:
Title: – Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management
Name: Kay Deselem
10/19/2017 10:59 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Division Director - Operations Support – Growth Management Operations & Regulatory
Management
Name: Kenneth Kovensky
10/19/2017 10:59 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Zoning Michael Bosi Additional Reviewer Completed 11/16/2017 1:15 PM
Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Reviewer Completed 11/16/2017 2:41 PM
Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 11/17/2017 4:20 PM
Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Completed 11/17/2017 4:51 PM
County Attorney's Office Scott Stone Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 11/20/2017 9:02 AM
Growth Management Department James French Deputy Department Head Review Completed 11/27/2017 7:33 AM
Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 11/27/2017 10:52 AM
County Attorney's Office Scott Teach Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 11/27/2017 11:20 AM
Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 11/28/2017 3:14 PM
County Manager's Office Leo E. Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 11/29/2017 12:01 PM
Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 12/12/2017 9:00 AM
AGENDA ITEM 3.E
Aft, c-ountrt
-4^.-,\-<.
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
FROM: ZONING DIVISION -ZONNC SERVICES SECTION
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 28. 2017
SUBJECT: PDI-PL2O170000247, SABAL BAy SIGN DEVIATTON
MIXED USE PLANNED IJNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD)
PDI-P120170000247, Sabal Bay PUD Last revised: 9/1/t7 page 1 of 9
Hearing Examiner Date: 9l?8117
APPLICANT/AGENT:
Aoplicant: Aeent:
collier Land Development Inc. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICp, vice president
2550 Coodlette Road, North Hole Montes, Inc.
Naples, FL 34103 950 Encore Way
Naples, FL 341l0
REOUESTED ACTION:
The applicant requests that the Hearing Examiner consider an insubstantial change to the Sabal Bay
Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MpuD), ordinance No. 05-59, as amendled, to add one new
deviation relating to signage along US 4l , Tamiami Trail.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject 2,426.08+ acre prope(y on the south side ofTamiami Trail East, approximately one quarrer
mile east of rhomasson Drive, in section 19, Township 50 South, Range i6 East, coilier county,
Florida. (See Location Map on the following page.)
o
(U
=CD
.scoN
t\sc!oooot\
oc!J&
To
-o
EJz
c
.9
=o
o-
o-o
co
(EooJ
PDI-P120170000247. Sabat Bay pUD Lasr revised: 9/.t/17
Hearing Examiner Oale glz,ljT Page 2 of g
In the nrrrative stttement, the applicant provides the following explanation:
Sabal Ray MPUD was approved bt rhe Collier Counly Commission on November 15, 2005. The pIlD is 2,426.0gacres in sbe and allows lor up lo 1,999 dwelling on I ,585 qcres as well qs seyeral olher non-residenlial uses,include some 75 acres o/ commercior deveropment a owing up to 200,000 squqre leet of retqir, ii;,i00';qror"
feet of offce and 250 hotel rooms. The. com.mercial develoiment is prinarilyiocaia aoig ttte u.s. ,ti yro'rrog"
(Trqcts COl. Co2, and Co3. depicted on the PUD nasrei plon). Ait ofthe connerciat ticx taue t"in )uu"a(Sabal Bay Counercial Tracr). PUD Tract Col is.fulty dereloped. Tricr Co2 is panially a*aopi riri"i cos
has one outparcel developed.
Excerpt from liiaster Plan showing commercial tracts
The Sabal Bay Mixed use Planned unit Development (MpUD) was last amended on March 2g,2ol2by ordinance Number l2-12. That ordinance amended ordinance Number 05-59 which approveddeviations numbers l-8 fiom the LDC. Ordinance Number 12-12 approved more deviations, number9-15' The current proposed insubstantial change amendment seeks'to approve what *ouiJ u"aor"Deviation #16.
This request, ifapproved would allow a third directory sign for the pUD that would be located on US4l at the entrance to the commercial tract identified as CLt3. There is cunently one di.ectory sign onUS4l and one on Thomasson Drive.
LAND USE AND ZONING:
This section ofthe staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties near theportion ofthe PUD affected by the request.
Northwest other developed portions of the commercial area within the Sabal Bay pUD, with azoning designation of Sabal Bay MPUD
Northeost: US 4l then various retail and office uses within the
designation of Lely Resort PUD
PDI-P120170000247, Sabat Bay pUD Last revised: 9/.t/,17
Hearing Examiner Oale: gl2gl17
Lely Reso( PUD, with a zoning
Page 3 of I
SABAL BAY MPUD.-N^,,
MI'IJI) MAS'IEId PLAN .". I. :=g
South:
MPUD
West:
MPUD
Developing areas within the Sabal Bay PUD, all with a zoning designation ofSabal Bay
Developing areas within the Sabal Bay PUD, all with a zoning desigrration ofsabal Bay
Aerial from Propefi Appraiser website
ANALYSIS:
Comprehensive Planning: Becavse this application is not adding uses or increasing the intensity ofthepreviously approved uses in the PUD, it is consistent with the Fulure Land Use Ele-ment (FLUE) of the
Growth Management Plan. See Attachment 2 for the complete report from Comprehensive pianning
staff
Conservalion and Coastal Managemenl Elemenl: Environmental staff has evaluated the proposed
change to the PUD documents. Signs are not addressed in the Conservation and Coastal Management
Element (ccME); therefore, there is no issue with consistency with that Element of the GMp.
PDI-P120170000247, Sabal Bay PUD Last revised: 9/.t/,17
Hearing Examiner Oate: 9128117
Page 4 of 9
r.tffi
\_.-/
Trawportation Elemerrr.' Transportation Planning staffhas evaluated the proposed changes to the pUD
Documents. Signs are not addressed in the Transportation Element; therefore, there is-no issue withconsistency.
LDC Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 set forth the criteria by which insubstantial amendmentsto a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD document are to be reviewed before they
can be approved. The criteria and a response to each have been listed as follows:
LDC Section 10,02.13.E.1:
e. Is there a proposed change in the boundary ofthe planned Unit Development (puDx
No, there is no proposed change in the boundary ofthe pUD.
Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity ofland use
or height of buildings within the development?
]{q, _ft*: is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or
height ofbuildings within the development.
Is there a proposed decrease in preservltion, conservation, recreation, or open space areaswithin the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously
designated as such, or five (5) acres in area?
No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space iyeaswithin the development as designated on the approved Master plan.
Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to includeinstitutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, aoo.""""tionor open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses?
No, the proposed amendment is to add one deviation related to project signage within acommercial portion ofthe project. There would be no increase to the iizeofareis uied for non-residential uses and no relocation ofnon-residential uses.
Is there s substantirr increese in the impacB ofthe development which may include, butare not limited to increeses in tralfic generetion; changes in trafiic ci..rl"tior; *i.p""ton other public facilities?
No, there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment.
will the change result in land use activiti* that generate a higher level ofvehicular trallic
lase.d upo-n the Trip Generation Manuar pubfished by the Institute or rrrnsportationEngineers?
The proposed amendment would not result in land use activities that generate higher levels ofvehicurar traffrc which werg no! anticipated when the principal ,r*'*Li"Ggii"iri
"a"p,.abased upon the Trip Generation Manuai pubrished by thi tnstitute of rr*.p;i;;'Engineers.PDI-P120170000247, Sabat BaypUD Last revis€d: gt1t,t7 '
Hearing examinei o^t"- izai?' -- Eser rsrlwv e' r' L Page 5 of g
b.
d.
c.
e.
f.
g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormrvster retention, or otherwise
lncrease stormwater discharge?
No, the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase
stormwater discharge.
h. Will the proposed change bring about a relatlonship to an abutting land use that would
be incompatible with an adjacent tand use?
No. There will be no incompatible relationships with abutting land uses.
i' Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plrn or PUD document or rmendment toa PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other
elements of the Growth Management Plen or which modification would increase the
density of intensity of the permitted land uses?
No. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the proposed changes to the PUD Document
would be consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Both environmental and transportation
planning staff have reviewed this petition, and no changes to the PUD Document are proposed
that would be deemed inconsistent with the CCME or the Transportation Element of tiie GMp.
This petition does not propose any increase in density or intensity ofthe permiued land uses.
j. The proposed change ls to a PUD District d$igrrted as e Development of Regional Impact
@Rr) and approved pursuant to chapter 380.06, Frorida statues, where-such chinge
requires a determinrtion and public hearing by collier county pursusnt to Sec. 3g0.06(19), F.S. Any change that me€ts the criterion of Sec. 380.06 iff;1e;2., F.S., and any
changes to a DRVPUD Master Plan that clearly do not crerte a substantiat deviation shall
be reviewed and approved by collier county under section 10.02.13 ofthe LDC.
This project is not a DRI, thus this is not applicable.
k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment toa PIJD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be I substantialmodification as described under Section(s) f0.02,f3 E.?
Based upon the analysis provide above, the proposed change is not deemed to b€ substantial.
LDC Scction 10.02.13.E.2:
Does this petition change the analysis of the Iindings and criteria used for the originalapplication?
No,.the proposed change does not affect the original analysis and findings for t11e most recentzoning action in petition puDA-pL20l l -000047. An excirpt from th".t"'r."poJii"p*"a ro.that petition is attached as Attachment 3. Attachment 3 contains the rui-ar'J -{ezoning
Findings from Petition pUDA-pL20l l_000047.
PDI-P120170000247, Sabat BaypUD Last rcvised: 9/1/17Hearing Examiner Oate: 9lagl17 Page 6 of g
DEVIATION DISCUSSION:
The petitioner is seeking one deviation from the requirements of the LDC. This deviation is deviation#16 as noted in the Purpose/Description of the Project. The deviation wording ls diiectly extractedfrom the petitioner's PUD document. The petitioneis rationale and stam*utyrii.eco.i#dation areprovided below.
Proposed Deviation #16:
Deviation 16 seeks relieffrom LDC section 5.06.04.F.3., Directory signs, which limits multiple-occupancy parcels or multiple parcels developed under a unilied aevelopment plan, with aminimum of 8 independent units, containing 20,000 s.f or mire of leasabt" ytoi, or"o, ro ommimum of one directory sign at one entrance on each public stre4 to allow for one adiitionatdirectory sign on Tamiami lrair East (u.s 4I) in adiition to the rwo existing direiij signs(ocated on Tamiami rrail East and rhomasson Drive). The second directory iign permitted onthe Tamiami Trail East frontage shall be located a minimum of500feet to thi eait iJ in" iirtugdirectory sign on Tamiami Trail East.
Pefitioner's Rationale: The peritioner's agant has provided the following justification and rationale
to support the requested deviation:
As stated, there are two existing Directory signs; one is located at the project enTance to theshoppes at Hammock cove on Thomasson Drive, and one is located at ihe project entranceto the shoppes at Hammock cove on Tamiami Trail East. This request i, io ino, oiothnpole sign at the second entrance (to serue the next phase of the shopping c"rt"" di"lop*"nt,
approximately 525 feet to the east on Tamiami rrail East. In hii-sigit, this requesr shouldhave been made at time the sabar Bay MpuD was approved in 2005"; however,'tn" "iia yo,
the additional sign really became clear once the commercial tracts were platted. fh"-iatotBay MPUD commercial frontage (on Thomasson and ramiami rra cimbined) "oi*i^more than 2,500 linear feet or road frontage. The oddirionar Directory sign is nir"r'iry toallow for reasonable signage to support thi uses located within thx phose"of the coiiircial
development. This is a master planned community and the signage witl be consistent with theexisting sign design and w r meet arl required dimensionil sindards of the LDC. Therequested sign will enhance the marketability of the parcels tocated ii this phase of thecommercial development and wi a ow easy idmtification of the businesr", ,itiin tii, phor"
for the public seeking to locate such businesses.
Please see additional information in the petitioner's document entitled, ,.Justification and Narrative -5-l8-17".
storf Analysis and Recommendation^.' Due to the project's location along Tamiami Trail (us 4l),which is a busy arterial roadway, staff agrees that some additio""r 'g,;;;',,;'ilJ"pr*i),". rr,"proposed number and location (see "Justification and Narrative- -i-ralrz;; io. thJi."i"r"a ,ig,location) ofthe additional sign would appear to further the intent ofthe sign regulationr'oifli" roc inSection 5.06.01 to:
PDI-P120170000247, Sabat Bay pUD Last revised: 9/1/17
Hearing Examiner Oate: 9l2Bl1T Page 7 of g
The NIM requirement for this petition was waived by the Hearing Examiner.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attomey Office has reviewed the staffreport on September l, 2017.
STAFF RECOMMEITIDATION:
Staffrecommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition pDI-pL2 O17OOOOZ47 .
Purpose and intent. The purpose of this sign code is to provide minimum cohtrol of signs
necessary to promote the health, safety and general vlelfare of the citizens of collier bouity,Fl?rida by lessening hazards to pedes*ians and vehicular- traffc, ty prise*ng propiity
values, byafeventing unsightlv and detrimental sicl,/lj' that dpth,?t fr a tho naatt Dt;- --^--t ^r
the countv and lead to economic declinp and blisht. bv preventin. Ji..n;,from;;frG;;A
"r""ttir" tir" ond nu*b"rt lhot thrrrl; obt"4r" on" oroth", to th" d"ii*irt oji" i lui
assuring good and attractive design that will strength", th"
"ornty,, opp"oiii *ii ^i,!11e,_ a1d by preserving the right of free speech and expreision- in the display of signs
[Underlining added for emphasisJ.
Attachments:
A) Proposed Ordinance RevisionsB) Comprehensive Planning Review Memo, dated g- 15- l ZC) Excerpt from the StaffReport prepared for pUDZ_pL2Ol1-0000045D) Email message waiving NIM, dated 6-27-17
purpor.. to , d"*." ut l""rt "oui".l*t to lit"*l "ooli*tio, of ,u"h r"*l"ti ^.
PDI-P120170000247, Sabal Bay PUD Last revised: 9/1/17
Hearlng Examiner Oale: 9fZOl17 Page 8 of g
PREPARED BY:
ZONING SERVICES SECTION
RDVIEWED BY:
PDI-P120170000247, Sabat Bay PUD Last revised: 8/28/12
Hearing Examiner Oate: 9l28l1t
tl
Slat I t=
DATE
sfs'(0
DATE
./7-n?3 9-t-11
MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR
ZONING DIVISION
DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the November 14, 2017 Board ofCounty Commissioners Meeting
MANAGER
Page g of 9
KAY Dtr[SELEM, AICP
EXHIBIT *C"
LIST OF DEVIATIONS
********!t****
Deviation 16 seeks relief fiom LDC Section 5.06.04.F.3.. Directorv Sims. which limis
multiole-occuoancy oarcels or multiple parcels develooed under a unified development plan.
with a minimum of 8 indeoendent units. containine 20.000 s.f. or more ofleasable floor area. to a
maximum ofone directorv sign at one entrance on each public street. to allow for one additional
directory sien on Tamiami Trail East (U.S.4l) in addition to the two existine directorv sims
(located on Tamiami Trail East and Thomasson Drive). The second directorv sien permitted on
the Tamiami Trail East frontase shall be located a minimum of 500 feet to the east ofthe existine
directorv sien on Tamiami Trail East.
Page I of I
Words underlined are added; words stare*.lh+eugh are deletions
H:Uo112017004\wAPDn3.d Resubmirhhsabat Ba), MPUD (pDI-pL2Ot 7OO002Ar ) tS- t _:O t it.aoc*
Attachment A
Grouth Management Depanlnent
Zoning [)ivisitrn
Comprehensive Planning Section
MEMORANDUM
To: Eric Johnson, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner
Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section
From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive planning
Date: August 15,2017
Subject: Funre Land Use Element (FLIJE) Consistency Review
PETITION NUMBER: PDI - PL2017000024i R4
P_ETITION NAME: Sabal Bay Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) with Insubstantial Changes(PDl) (Review 4)
REQUEST: To amend Sabal Bay MPUD, approved via Ordinance #05-59, as amended via Ordinance #12-
12, to add one additional deviation re8arding signage to allow for more than one Directory Sign along thecommercial frontage on Tamiami Trail, for a maximum of two Directory Signs for one pUb oi on" publi.
road. (The Land Development Code allows only one Directory Sign per publii road.)
LOCATION: The r2,416.49-acre site is located on the southeast side of the intersection of Tamiami TrailEast (US 4l) and Thomasson Drive, and north and west of the Wentworth Estates pUD; in Section 19,Township 50 South, Range 26 East and sections 23,24,25,26, and36, Township 50 south, nange zo easr.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING CoMMENTS: The subject PUD is designated Urban, Urban CommercialDistrict' Urban Mixed use Activity center Subdistrict *ll, and Urban M]xed-Use oiri.ict, urL"n co".tatFringe Subdistrict, and is within the Coastal High Hazard Area as depicted on the Future Land Use uap otheGrowth Management Plan. The Activity Center Subdistrict is intendid to u..orn.oaut. u uui.f,-o'f residentialand non-residential uses, including-!1111"d unit Developments. The Sabal s.y MpuD lJ;proved viaordinance #12-12 for a maximum of 1,999 residential dweiling units and 182,000 square Gt o#ommercial.
This petition is for Insubstantial changes to the Planned Unit Development (pDI) to amend the MpUD to adda siSn deviation pertaining to the commercial portion of the PUD which is located in the MURC.-No ct ang".to the PUD boundary, or in permitted uses, densities, or intensilies are being requested. - -
l"f:'111 FLUE objectives and policies are stated below (ln itatics); eachpolicy is followed by stafranalysis(in bold).
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104
Attachment B
Page I of 2
FLUE Policy 5.4:
New
-developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the sunounding land uses, as setJbrth inthe Land Development Code (Ordinonce 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effecive Octobeitr tg, 2004, asamended). (Comprehensive Planning stalf leaves this determination to funing staffas part of theirreview of the petition.)
FLUE Objective 7 and Relevant policies
Due to the minor changes proposed (no changes in permitted uses, densities, or intensities), and since the
Sabal Bay MPUD was evaluated for consistency with the Future Land Use Element prior to the adoptionof Ordinance #12-12 on March 12, 2012, staffis of the opinion that a re-evaluation of FLUE policies
under objective 7 (pertaining to access, interconnections, walkability, etc.) is not necessary.
Based upon the rbove analysis, the proposed PDI may be deemed conslstent with the Future Lrnd UseEl€ment.
cc: Mike Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division
Dovid ll/eeks, AICP. Growth Manageme Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive planning Section
Ray Bellows, Manager, Zoning Semices Section
PDI-PL20l7-0247 Sabal Bay R4.docx
2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Page 2 of 2
EXCERPT FROTUI THE STAFF REPORT FOR SABAL BAY, PUDA-PL2O11.OOOOO47
FINDINGS OF FACT:
EUD.Findinss: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.8.5 states that, "ln support of its recommendation, the
C^CPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's comptiance with the fotto*ing citeria.(StafPs responses to these criteria are provided in bold font):
1.. The suitability of the area for the type and paftern of developmmt proposed in relation tophysical characteristics of the land, su*ounding areas, tra/fic ind oi""ti, drainage, sewer,
water, and other utilities.
staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and berievcs the [ses and property
development regulations are compatible with the development approved in the area aslimited by stafr. The commitments made by the apptlcant strouu provide rdequrte
assurtnces that the proposed change should not rdvenely affect living conditions in thetret.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified contror ond suitabirity of any proposed agreements,
contractE, or other instruments, or for amendments in those prowsed, pirticularty i they ^oyn!"r" lo arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation an| maintinance
ofsuch areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintaine1 at public expense.
Documetrts submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the county Attorney'soffice, demonstnte unified control of the property. Additionally, ihe development will berequired, to gain platting and/or site development approval. Both processes will ensure thatap-propriate stipulstions for the provision of rnd continuing operition and maintenauce ofinfrastructure will be provided by the developer.
3- _ confornity of the proposed pranned unit Deveropment v,ith the goars, objectives, andpolicies of the Growth Monagement plan (GMp).
sta-ff hr1 reviewed this petition _and has olfered an rnalysis of the relevant goals, objectivesand policies of the GMp within the GMp discussion and the rttachfr ,.poJ i.o,comprehensive Pranning staff snd the zotritrg anarysis of this stafr report. Basi on tt o."stalr. analyses, pranning zonin_g staff is of the opinion that this petition ,"y u. ro*aconsbtent with the overell GMp
4. The internal and externar compatibirity of proposed uses, which conditions may includerestrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screeningrequirements-
stsff has provided a review- of the proposed uses rnd beriev$ thrt the project will becompatible with the surrounding area, subject to approver of the recommera.ir ltrlt*io,of stalf, the proposed development standards and project commltments.
5: . fu" adequacy of usable open space areos in exislence and as proposed to serve thedevelopment.
Attachment C Page 1 of 6
EXCERPT FROM THE STAFF REPORT FOR SABAL BAY, PUDA.PL2O.Il-OOOOO47
The_amount of native preserve aside for this project meets the mitrimum requirement ofthe LDC.
6. - _?" timing or sequence .of development for the purpose of assuring the afuquacy ofavailable improvements andfacilities, both public and priiate.
The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project st thistime, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluate-d as part of tn. GupTransportation Element consistency review. The project,s development'must comply withall other applicable concurrency management regulations when de-velopment approv"ls aresought Additionally, the plJD document contrins additional developer commit^ments that
should help ensure there are odequate frcilities aveilable to serve thirproject.
7- The ability ofthe subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion.
Tle rrea has adequate supporting infrastructure such as road capacity, wastewater
disposal system, and potable wrter supplies to rccommodate this project rasea upon ttrecommitments made by the petitioner and the fact thet adequaie public flcititiesrequirements will be addressed when developmetrt approvrls are sought Additionrlly thispetition represents an rmendment to an approved puD; tro acreige ;r intensity or density
is being added.
6t Conformity with PUD regulatiow, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations inthe particular case, based on determination that such modificitions *i1"rtfi"a'^ iiangpublic purposes to a degree at least equivalenr b literal application ofsuch regurations.
The petitioner is seeking 15 deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with thepurpose rnd intent of the ptanned Unit Development Districts 6oc s""tioo 2.03.06.A).This criterion requires an evaluation of the extint to which development strndards anddevistions proposed for this puD depart from development strndsrds that would berequired for the most similar conventional zoning district. stdr has provided an aoaiysisof the deviations in the Deviation Discussion portion of this siatr report, and isrecommending approval of all deviations.
Bezone Findinm: LDC subsection r0.03.05J. rr4rer, "when pertaining to the rezoning of land,the report and recommendations to_ the planning commission to- the Board "i Co*,ycommissioners...shalr show that the pranning comm'lssion has studied -a "on.ra"r"a p-po."achange in relation to the folrowing when appticabre- (staf,s responses to ,nii *ilri, *"provided in bold font):
1' Wether the proposed change will be consistent with the goars, objectives, & policies ofthe Future Land (Jse Map and the ilements of the Growth Management plan.
Thc zoning anerysis provides an indepth review of the proposed prdect. strff is of theopinion that the project as proposed is consistent witt cnip ilur i"ri""il.l ..qri""g tt.
PaSe 2 of 5
EXCERPT FROM THE STAFF REPORT FOR SABAL BAY, PUDA.PL2O1,I.OOOOO47
project to be compatible with neighborhood development stalr recommends that thispetition be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMp. The petition
""o "lro t" a""..aconsistent with the ccME. Therefore, statf recommends th;t this petition be Jeemedconsistent with the GMP subject to staffs conditions of approval,
2. The existing land use pattern;
Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the ..surrounding Land Use and
lonrng"-portion of this report and discussed it at length in the zoningi review analysis.staff believes the proposed amendment is appropriate given the existing-land uru p"ttu.n,
and development restrictions included in the pUD Ordinlance.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts;
The proposed PUD amendment would not create rn isolated zoning district because thesubject site is already zoned puD and there are no land additions priposea as port of thisamendment
4. wether eisting distict b-oytndgries are illogically drawn in relation to existing
conditions on the property proposedfor change.
stalf is of the opinion that the district boundaries are logically drawn givetr the currentproperty ownership boundaries and the existing pUD zoning.
5- wether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning
necessary.
The proposed amendmetrt is not necessary, per sei b,ot it is being requested in compriancewith the LDC provisions to seek such the amindment to alow the-own.. flru opprJr'oity todevelop the tand with uses other thrn what the existing zoning district wouu altow.without this amendment, the property courd be deveropedin comp-riance with tne existingPIID_ ordinance regulations, The opplicant's ..qroi i. consisient *itt it" -p.rp"r.a
GMPA.
6 . .. whethgr the proposed change wiT adversely in/ruence riving conditions in theneighborhood;
staff is of the opinion that the proposed amendment, with the commitments made by theapplicant, can been deemed conristmt county,s land use poricies that ere reflected bv theFuture Land_use Erement (FLUE) of rhe cMi. rrre pro;eit incua;;;ilii"lon.rnd standards- that are designed to address compati'uirity of the projeci. o*.irpi"ii ,,compliance with the proposed p,D amendm6nt shoutd not aaversery i.p"Ii'ir'rirgconditions in the area.
7' wheth* the proposed change will create or excessivery increase trafrc congestion orcreate types of traflic deemed incompatible with suftounding taid uses, t""oi'" ojpiii uoiu'^",
Page 3 of 5
EXCERPT FRO]UI THE STAFF REPORT FOR SABAL BAY, PUOA.PL2O11.OOOOO47
or projected types of vehic,.lor trafic, including activity during construction phases of thedevelopment, or otherwise affect pablic safety,
The roadway infrrstructure hr' adequate cepacity to serve the proposed project with themitigation thrt wilt be provided by the developer. steff believes the ietitlon ."o u" a""..0consistent with all elements of the GMp if the mitigation is Included in anyrecommendation of approval.
8. l{hether the proposed change will create a drainage problem;
The proposed amendment should not create drainage or surface water problems. The
developer of the project will be required to adhere toi surface water management permitfrom the sFwMD in conjunction with any locat site development ptan ipprovaL end
ultimate construction on site.
9. wether the proposed change will seriousry reduce right and air ro adjacent areas;
If_this amendment petition is approved, any subsequent developmetrt would need to complywith the epplicable LDC standards for development or as outlined in the puD document
The location ofthe proposed buitdings, combined with the setbscks and project bulfers will
help insure that light and rir to rdjacent treas will not be reduced,
10. llhether the propsed chonge will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area;
This is e subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal orexternal to the subject property. property valuation is alfected by a f,ost of factorsincluding zoning; however zoning by itserf msy or mry not sfrect varues, since vduedetermination is driven by market conditions.
11. wether rhe proposed chonge will be a deterrent to the improyement or development of
adjacent prop*ty in accordance with existing regulations;
The proposed zoning change should not be r deterrent to the improvement of adjacentproperties.
12' Whether the proposed change will cot stitute a grant of special privilege to an individual
otenel as contrasting with the public welfure;
Th-e proposed development complies with the Growth Management pran which is a pubricpolicy strtement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with saidcomprehensive Pran. In right of this fact, thc proposed chrnge does not constitute a grantof _special privilege. consistency with the rlut is furthei determio"a io t" "-piuri"welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public lnterest
- '-'
13. ll'hether there are substantial reasons why the properry cannot be used in accordancereith existing zoning;
Page 4 of 6
EXCERPT FROM THE STAFF REPORT FOR SABAL BAY, PUDA.PL2O1l.OOOOO47
The subject property courd be. deveroped ,within the parrmeterc of the existing zoningdesignations; however, the petitioner is seeking this amindment in comptiance .itr, incprovisions for such action. The petition canle evaluated and action taken as deemedappropriate through the puDlic hearing process. starf believes the proposed "-"na-"ntmeets the intent of the puD district, if stalps conditions of epproval'are adopted andfurther, believes the public interest will be maintained.
11 wether the change suggested is out of scare with the needs of the neighborhood or theCounty;
As noted previously, the subject property arready has a zoning designation of pUD; thePUD rezoning wls evaruated at the rezoning stsge strd was diemed consistent with theG-MP. _The GMP is s policy strtement which has waluated the scare, density rnd intensityof land uses deemed to be acceptable throughout the urbandesignated areas of coniercounty. staff is of the o-pinion that the development standaids rnd the developercommitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs oi thecommunity,
15. whether is it impossible to Jind other adequate sites in the counly for the proposed use indistricts already permitting such use.
The petition wls revierved on its_own merit for complience with the GMp and the LDC;and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. Trc froposedamendment is consistent with the GMp as it is proposed to be amended as discus;a inother portions of the stalf report
16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of sire alteration, whichwould be required to makz the property usable for any of the range of potentiar us.u under thepropos ed zo n ing c las s ifi cat ion.
Additional development anticiprted by the puD document would require considerable siteslterrtion' This project w r undergo extensive evaruation rerative to an r.a"iri,,t"t.,
"ralocsl development regulations *dlg .g: site development plan or pfrttirg
-"ppior"f
process and again leter as prrt of the building permit process.
17. The impact of development on- the avairabirity of adequate pubric facilities and servicescons.istent
-'tf
ith.the levers of semice adopted in the cofiiir cointy Growth Manogemint ito, oraas de/ined and implemented through tie collier counry Adequate public Facirities ordinance,as amended.
This petition hrs been reviewed by county stalf thst is responsibre for jurisdictionrrelemcnts of-the GMp as part of-the amendment p.ocess
"od those staff ;;;;;;r.concluded thst no Level of service w r be adversery impacted with the commitmentscontrined in the PUD document.
Page 5 of 5
EXCERPT FROM THE STAFF REPORT FOR SABAL BAY, PUDA-PL2Ol1.OOOOO47
18, Such otherfactors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)
shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and wllfare.
To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing.
Page 6 of 6
From: StsainMark Imaiho:Markstrain@collieroov.netl
S€nt Tuesday, )une 27, 2077 B:34 AM
To: Paula McMichael; BeasleyRachel; ReischlFred
Cc: Bob Mulhere; Stephanie lGrol
Subr€ctr RE: Sabal Bay pDI - pL2Ot700O0Z47 - NIM
In response to the attached insubstantial change waiver request: pursuant to LDC section
10.03.06.H.2 as amended by ordinance 2014-33, the requirement for a neighborhood
informational meeting (NIM) is waived. The change requested is insubstaitial and limited in
scope with minimal, if any, impact on adjacent properties.
Marb
239.252.+446
under Florrda Law e_mar addresses are publ€ records ! yo! do nol wani your e-marr address released rn respons€ io a pub rc recordsrequesi do nol send electronrc martta thrs cnnty tnstead contact thls ot{rce by telepho.e or rn wrtrng
From: Paula McMichael Imailto:paulaMcMichael@hmenp.coml
Sent: Thursday, Ju ne 22, ZOL7 10:37 AM
To: BeasleyRachel <RachelBeaslev@colliersov.net>
cc: Bob Mulhere <BobMurhere@hmens.com>; strainMark <Markstrain@cofiiersov.net>; stephanie
Karol <StephanieKarol@hmenr.com,
-Subrecr: Sabal Bay pDt - p120170000247 - NtM
Hi Rachel,
We would like to request that the requirement for a Neighborhood lnformation Meeting be waived forthe above-referenced petition, the sabal Bay sign PDl. The requested deviation to allowln additionaldirectory sign for the commerciar properties arong US 4r wi have rimited impacts on adjacentproperties, given that the commercial frontage is approx. l,600 feet in length along US 4i and theproposed directory sign will match existing signage within the pUD.
we responded to the rast comment retter from staff yesterday; it is arso attached for your reference.
Thank you,
Paula N. C. McMichael, AtCp
Associate, Director of planning
950 Encore Way
Naples, Ft 34110
Direct: (239) 254-2OZa
Main Line: (239) 254-2000
Facsim ile : 1239| 254-2099
paulamcmichael@hmens.com
Attachment D
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Patricia Young < payoung3@hotmail.com >
Monday, October 02, 20L7 L0:24 AM
DeselemKay
Just what is needed
Dear Ms. Oesaelem,
Than k you for you r earlier response. And liust received an official letter in the mail rega rding the sign at the shoppes ofHammock cove. As a resident of the lsles of collier Preserve, I think the sign is a definiie goo-d addition to ttre shoppingarea As itlnow, itappearsthat culver/s isa separate entity. The newsign wall align culverswiththe other stores, andhopefully, we willget some new and attractive business(hotel, bookstore?) to buil, on that large parcel of land to theeast of Culve/s.
Patricia Young
5074 Andros Drive, Naples 34113
Sent from !!g!! for Windows 10
o
COUJER COUNTY GOVERT{MENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
mrvl,lr.cg lt lerlou. net
zE(x' NOBTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPtrS, FIOR|DA 34104
123912s2-Z4rn FAx: (239) 2s2-53sE
Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD Insubstantlal change includes any change that
is not considered a substantial or a mlnor change. A PUD lnsubstantial change to an approved
PUD ordlnance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsectlon 10.02.13 E.1 and shall
requlre the review and approval of the Hearlng Examiner. The Hearlng Examlne/s approval
shall be based on the findlngs and crlterla used for the orlglnal appllcation.
PETITION NO
PROJECT NAME
DATE PROCESSED
To be completed by stoff
Nameof Appttcant(s). Collier Land Development, lnc.
Address: 2550 Goodlette Road North o*.Naples state: FL ztp. 34103
Telephone:2394344049 @lt: N/A Fax: N/A
E-Ma1 Mdress: VPike@CollierEnterprises.com
Nameof Agen,. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Vice President, Planning Services
Folos:71750002507 Sestron: 19 r*,p: 50S Ranse:
pp,n. Hole Montes, lnc.
Address:950 Encore Way Clty:NqPLes state:FL aP. U11o
Telephone:239-254-2000 ce[: N/A Fax: 239-254-2099
E-Mait Address: bobmulhere@hmeng.com
26E
6lt7l207s Page 1 of 5
o
I
i
I
;
COITIER COUNTY GOVERNMEI{T
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARIMENT
www.oolllarrov,nct
28OO NOBTH HORSE5HOE DRIVE
NAPIES, FLORIDA 14104
(2391 2s2-2tl{lo FN(: (2391 252{i158
ls the applicant the owner of the subject property?I ves Eno
tr 1. lf appllcant ls a land trust, so lndicate and name the beneflciaries below.
tr 2. lf applicant is corpoftttlon other than a publlc corporation, so indicate and name offlcers
and ma,lor stockholders below.
tr 3. lf applicant ls a partnership, limited partnershlp or other business entlty, so lndlcate and
name prlnclpals below.
n 4. f appllcant ls an owner, lndlcate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, lf any.
tr 5. f appllcant Is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and lndlcate actual owne6 lf not indlcated on
the lease.
! 6. f appllcant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract, and lndicate actualowner(s)
name and address below: (tf spoce is lnadequote, ottach on sePdftrte poge)
Robert D. Corina, Prealdent; Patrlck IJ. gEter, vP; Chrlstlan sPllker, vP
On a separate sheet, attached to the appllcation, descrlbe the lnsubstantlalchange request.
tdenflfy how the request does not meet the PUD substantlal chanSe crlteria established in LDC
subsection 10.02.13 8.1.
PUD NAME:Thg SAbAI BAY MPUD ORDINANCE NUMBER:m12-12 end 2006-59
FOUO 717500g2507
provlde a legal (lf PUD ls recorded) or graphlc descriPtlon of area of amendment (this may be
graphlcally illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). lf applyinS for a portlon of the PUD, provlde a
legal descriptlon for subject portlon.
Attach on a separate sheet, a wrltten descrlption of the maP or text change.
Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? [ Ves
6h712075
nro
P8ge 2 of 5
o
COTUEB COUNTY GOVERNMEN|T
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
www.colllerEov.net
lf no, please explain:
Has a publlc hearlng been held on this property withln the last year?I ves El ruo
lf yes, in whose name?
Has any portion of the PUD been E soro and/orf] DEVELonED?
Are anychanges proposed forthe area sold andlor developed?
lfyes, please descrlbe on an attached separate sheet.
flves Eru,
28(x' NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FIORIDA 34104
12391 2s2-24/JO FA)(: (2391 252-63s9
6lt7lzols PaSe 3 of 5
COIIJER COUt{W GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MANACEMEI{T DEPARTMENT
www.colllerEov.net
ztOO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAPLES, FTORIDA 34I(M
(2391 2s2-2'r00 FAX: (239) 252-5358
The following 5ubmlttal Requlrement checklist ls to be utllized durlng the Pre-Appllcatlon Meetlng and at
me of appllcatlon submlttal. At flnalsubmtttal, the checklist ls to be completed and submltted with th€
appllcatlon packet. Please provlde the submlttal items ln the exact order listed below, wlth cover sheets
attached to each sectlon.submlttals wlll not be
ADD.ITIONAT REqUIREMENTS FOR THE PUETIC HEARING PROCESS:
. Follolrrlng the completlon of the revlew Process by County Revlew staff,
submlt all matedals electronlcally to the desEnated Proiect manager'
. please contact the prolect manaSer to confirm the number of addltlonal coples requlred.
the appllcant shall
6t17l2OL5 Pago 4 of 5
@IUER C(X'NTY GOVERNMETT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OEPARTME,{T
wwur.oolll6rrov,net
28I'{' NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE
NAP| ES, FLORTDA 34104
(2191 252-2rO0 FAX: (Zt9l 2s2{3sr
PTANNERS - INDICATE IF THE PET]TION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOTTOWING REVIEWERS:
tr School Olstrlct (Resldendal Components); Amy
Lockheart n Bayshor€/Gateway Trlangle Redevelopment:
Executlve Dlrector
Utllldes EnElneerlnt: (ds VanLcnten Parl(5 and Recreation: Vid(v Ahmad
Emergencv Manatement: Dan Summers Naples Alrport Authorltv: Ted Solidav
Conservanca of SWFL: Nldrole Ryan other:
qty of Naples: Robln SlnSer, Plannlnc Dlrector Othen
Ei PUD Amendm8nt lnsubstan{al (PDll: S1,500.0O
I Prc-Appllcatlon Meetlry: S500.0o
eI EstlmEted lepl Adverdslng f:e fo, the Offtce of the Hearlng Examiner: #gRtU $1 , 12s
The completed appllcatlon, all requlred submlttal materials, and fees shall be submltted to:
GroMh Management oepartment/Plannlnt and Retulatlon
ATTN: Buslness Center
2E00 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, F[ 34104
2-21-2017
Robert J. Mulhere, FA[C, Mce PresldenvAgent
Appllcant/Owner Name (please prlnt)
$1, soo
$1, 12s
$ 100 (Flre Rev)
s2,725
- 500 (credl E )
s2,22snt/Owner Slgnature
6l77l207s Pate 5 of 5
Date
FOR PETITION NUi'BERS(S}
AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION
THE SAET' EAY TPUO
re6tliclions imposed by the appmved action.
5. Wdl ar.rthorae ry9!ryf{gllqE, F lcP. vlcE PRESIDEMT, PT NNING sERvEEs lo acl as ountny rsplDs€ntetiv€
in any maters rBgarding thlE petitlon lncluding 1 through 2 above.
that I havo r€ad tho for€golng Afildavlt ot AuthorLsdon and that
o
r. Pmcicr L. U *re{.- (print name), "" !,ce Pe.6,",-"r (titl", ir
appiiE6le) ot mpany, lfsPPlicabls), swear or affirm
uirier oatti, ttr urchase4-land that:
.1. I have full authority to secure the approvdl(s) requested and to impose covenants and rssflctions on
the rsferenc€d propery as a rssult of any ac{ion appro\Ed by the County ln accordancs with lhl6
appllcation and the Land Do\reloPmBnt Code;
2. Al answBrs to the quastions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplemenlary matter
attached hBreto and m8de a part of thls application aro honest and true;
3. I have authorized tho staff of Colller County to enter upon the property during normal wortlng hourB
for the purpose of lnvestigatlng and evaluating th€ request mado through thls spPlication; and that
4. Ths property will bs trEnsfened, conveyed, sold or subdivided subjsct to the conditions and
',Votes:. tf the apptbant is a @ryonton, then tt ts usuatty execu,lrJ#f#ffirt;!.ff;,
the documents shou|
aging lrleml r.'
t lf the applicant is a patutership, then typiw a parntet can slgn on behalt ot lhe padnerchlP.
. tt ilp ;Wttund is ; limited pdtnershtp, lhen the geneml pafuiet must siln and be ldentfiod as ff1e 'gene'El
parhet d the named Paine8hiP.. ffthe applbant is d bust, then they must include the trustee's name and the wotds 'as trustee'-
. ln erci' instane, fir9t detemlno the sPpticant's s6,tus, e.g.; individud, @tPorcte, tus4 paftnershlP, ahd then
use re epproplate tomat tor that ownetship.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF COLLIER
b€d beforB me on Fe:1-ZP \-l (dets) by
o of peruon poviding oath or sffrmation)' 88
ho iB poIsonally knosrn to me or wilo has prcduc€d
(typa of lder if,cailon)as ldentiflcation n l .l G. U*Jt-Zs tt'sTArprsEAL.r- slgnrturB of Notsry Publlc
0
r ' Vdlerlo L. Plk.
Not.ry Putllc -
Conml.lbn *gG 22100
Er4/hqOAllTXXnO , '
Or
cnm4lA.lx)It 55
nEv 3/lt[a
Under ponald€s of psrrury, I
oouiEn cou{TY GovEir{M EiIT
GROWTH MAI{AGEMEIfT DEPAiN'EiII
ww,@lllGlrw.nct
PreAppllcation Meeting Notes
PelnonrvlxrrfuI
Date and Tlme:
AsrrsncdPranne* Ptrrrcrl J it'tt4-t
E rdneGrll[ t/taneF (fot P?Us .nd FP3l:
I P-Jtct t
ProJect Name:
PL #:
prorett to h 2-El3@]925g7currnt zonlnti:
ProJed Address3
2M M)IIH HORSESHOE DRIVE
]lAPtE!, FT.ORIDA iar.oa
(zrlrl 2s2-24@
Appllc.rtt:
*o*wrorMPhonc:-
Agent/Flrm Mdress:Clty: Sm:-Zlp!
Prop€rty Owner:
Clty: St €!
-
Ap:
Pba.. DrcrrHc thc iollnnlng, lf eppllcabh:
l. Tot l Acrc.f :
ll. EopocGd * of RcsldcntLl t nlt33
lll. hopoi3d Commerclsl SquErt Foot tll
-
h, For Amandmcnts, lndh*t the orljlml Pctlum mmber:
v, lf tlrcrc ls en dllEme or n!.oludon acsodatcd wlth $ft plolcct, plcast hdkata tlE
type and numbor:
vl, t th€ prorGct ls wlthln a Plat, Pnovlde ltrG name.nd AR#/P! :
@IUER COUI{TV Gor'EB MEIVT
GROWTH MA AGEME T DEPATTIUIEITIT
*w.cd[a]rovJrct
Z& ORTH HONSESI{OE DRIVE
I{APLES,
'LoRIDA
il4lo4
(239) 2s2-ZtE0
,a
"-@gy*
COtuEN @UJ{TY €OT'EBNIUEI'IT
GB]olf, IH MA AI6EMENf DEPAN'MEIVI
$,wu.collLr:ov.nat
28OO NOBITI HORSESDIOE DRIVE
NAPtfS, FLORIDA 34104
(2391 252-2/UrO FAX 12391 252-s724
PLar. compl€to lhs lbllorrlng and anal to GMDjddrB.slnlocollicrgov,not or f.x io tho Op.]Btims DMslon
a zsg-zaz-iu or oubmlt In p€r.on b 0l3 AddE$lns sedlon at the lborl6 addr6!!. E0m-Eu!t-b!.-!bDrdlry
Not aI ltdns wlll lPply to ore{y Prcroot ltcmB h bold typr ate rlqulrld. ,OUO nu*"r""-f,Usf BE
PR(MOEO, Fom! oE.' than 6 monhc Ydl rEquiE addflfial rwl6 , and apP?o\r8l by th€ Add]rlllng Sedbn,
PETmO TYPE (rrdba b tyry belclr., oqndae a str/Pa/alo A&tr6,s//l8 Cll€,cldsl tot *ch tulfrbn UPs)
trtrtrtrtrtr
Etrtrtrtr
BL (BhrIng Pamlt)
BD (Eo.il Dock E(Dn3lon)
CarntvaBolrous Pemlt
CU (CmdltlonalUgo)
EXP (EEa/atlon Psmlt)
FP (Flnd Pl8t
Ll-A (Lot LhcAdust nrnt)
PNc (Projrd Nams ChanEc)
PPL (Ptsm & Pbt Retdcrr)
PSP (Pr€ltnlnary SrbdMrbn Pbt)
PUD R.zono
RZ (Stand d Rczono)
SDP (Slia Osvllopm€I Phn)
SDPA (SDP Amendm.nt)
SDPI (lnlubslanti€l Chfigc to SOP)
slP (Sla lmprowmsnl Phn)
SlPl (lnlublbntbl Chango b SIP)
sllR (S-fBot l{8me Changc)
Sl'{C (StrErt Name Chano€ - UnplsttEd)
TDf, Cfirnde of Dw€bpmcr{ REht!)
VA (Vadancs)
VRP (Vegrta0on R.moval P6mit)
VRSFP (VcgElrtlon Rrlnotal & Slic Fll Permlt)
OTHER PDI
LEGAL DESCRTPTION of lubisct proprrty q prcPet 8 (caPy ol lsNW d8w,lptlfi mqy bo d/&ohsd)
FoUo (Property lD) MTMBER(s) of abow (ataaah to, uos6{,ohle wflt logal de8r,tbtbn ll noft lhan one)
71750m'2507
STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (ec qPplcatile, t alrcs@ a&dgned)
. LOcAT}o[ ilAP must be a(ached shcirylng enct locatlon d pflocl/slte ln rulaton to naaprl publlc read rbht-
of{vay
r SURVEY (copy - n6cd.d onv for unPlaltcd Prop€rtos)
CURRENT PROJECT llAl,E (ff qp cable)
PROPOSEO PROJECT NAME (trEM,EAD,€)
PROPoSED STREET MMES (/appleaD,4
SITE DEVELoPMENT PI-AN NUMBER (br q,l8dng potuts/dtes onD
SDP - orAR or PL *
o
Etrtrtrtril
EItrtrtrE
l- ::l
'secton 19. Townshlo 50S. Ranoe 26E See AEtached
o
tu
COTUER GOUNTY GOVERNMENT
GROWTH MAI{Ai6ETIENT DEPATTMENT
wsw.colllGlroY'llat
2TOO ORTH HORSEIHOE ORIVE
!|rAPIES, TLOBIDA 34rO4
(ztlrl 252-2aoo Frlx (zt9l 252-s72.
ProLct d d.\ralogm.nl ntn68 ProPor6d for, or Ekeady appoal!|g ln' 9!!Cao'l0urn-dst{0l!E ( appleotloni
lndlio whether'proposod or e)ds0ng)
Phrlc Rrtum ApEov.d Ch.Gklht By: El Elmil E Fax E Poi8onally dd(rd uP
Appllsrnt H8m.: Robert !!!g!!ger-!ll$
Phom: 23&254-2018
slgnature on Mdresslng chockliBt do6E not consutute ProJecl and/or streoi Name
approval and ls subject to further rovlew by lhe OPorations Divislon'
FOR STAFF I'gI OI{LY
roflo rumUr 71750002507
Follo Nunb€r
Fo[o Numbal
Pollo Nutlber
Folto ilumbol
Fo0o Number
ApproYod by:-
Updrrrd
tF OLDERTHAN 6 i,ONTHS, FORM MUST BE
UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED
-
@IIIER COUNf
'
GOT'ERT{MEITT
GROWTH MAI{AGEMENT DEPARN'E T
www.colllerr 'nct
2t0o t{of,fi lloisEsHoE Df,IVE
NAREs, rLOilDA :l4lotl
lBtl?5.2-21,,o
collle. County cont ct lnformatlon:
Name Rdlew Dlsclplln€Phone Emall
O orts Alcorn Utllity Bllllng 821-8136 dlrisalcom@colllerEo,,.net
E Dsvld Anhony Environm6nbl Revlew E2-2197 davidanthony@collierSov.n€t
D summerAraque Environm€ntal Revigx 2s2-5290 summerbrownaraque@colllerygv.net
D steve Baludr, P.E Transportauon PlEnnint 252-2367 StephenBaludrecolnergor.net
O Laurle Beard Trdnsportatlon PathwlYs 252-5782 Laurlebeard@colllerBov.net
O RachelBeasley zonint S€Mcts 252-8202 rach€lbeasl€y@colllerSov,net
D Marcus Eerman County Sr,trvglpr 252{885 MarcqsBerman@colllergov.n4
I Mark Burtchin ROW Permlttint 252-s165 markburtchln@(rlliersov.net
E GeoBe Gsclo Utlllty Bllllnt 252-5543 *eor*cascio@cd liseov.net
O HeldlAshtor ocko Manaalna Asst. Counv AttomcY ,l24773 hcldlsshton@collieryov.net
fl Sue Faulkner comprehenrlYe Plannlnt EZ-5715 suefEulkner@collierEov.net
B Date rev North Naples Firc 597-1222 ddl ef eve collrrgov.net
E Paula Fl€lshm€n lmpact Fee AdmlnlstEtlon ?l.2-2924 Dau laflelsh man@col lier8ov.n et
E t{ancy Gundlari, Al@, PLA zonlna Scrvlc€s ?52-2{€r'.nancysundladl9colller8ov,net
O Shar Hlngson Eart Naples Flre Olsuict 587-5650 rhinrson @cctco.orE
D John Houldsrorth EnglneerlnE SeMce!252.5757 lohnhouldswortr@colller!orr.nct
O ,lodtBush€s Transportadon Pathways 25,2-5744 jodlhu8hes@colll6rgoY.net
fl Attcta Humphrte3 slte Planr Revlelver/ROW ?l2-2326 allclahumphries@colllersov.net
O Erlc Johnson, NcP,cFM zonin8 SeNlces 252-293L erlciohnson@colll€r8ov.net
O MsrEla Kendall compr€h€nstvs E!nning 252-2*7 marciakendall@collieBov.net
E steDhen Lenb€rEer Envlronmeital Rgrdew 252-291s stevelenberEer@collhrRov.net
E Garrett LouYlerE Stormwater 252-2526 SarrettlouvlereCcolllerEov,n€t
E Paulo Mardnr UtiliUes 25242A5 paulomartlns@colller8ov.net
E thomas Mastroberto Flre Safety 252-734€Thomasmarroberto@coll lerSov.net
! Jad( Mc{erna, P.E.Entineerlng SeMces 2s2-29tt ladmdrcnna@colllercov,net
! Man Mdean, P.E.Prlncipal Project MansSer 2s2-8279 matthewmdeEn@colliergov.net
E Gllb€rt Mondvaiz lrdllty lmpact tlqt _25242t5 gllbertmonclvair@colliergov,net
E Annls Mqam Addr€sslnt 2s2-s5 'annlsmoxam@collle.Eov,net
E Stefenle Nawrockl Plannlns and zonlnS 252-23L1 stefanleNawrockl@collierSoy.n€t
O Jesslca Huckeba CAD Technidan 252-2375 JesslcaHuct:ba@colllerEov,net
D Brandy otrro Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@colllerBoY,net
CT.,TUER GOU'{W GOVERI{MEITT
GBOWTH MANAGEMEiIT DEPATUE'{T
wwv.colllefaov.nGt
Addltlonal Atiendce contact lntotmatlon:
2!00 MrRIll l{oisE HoE oRl\rE
APIE Fu)RIDA il4loa
l2!t9l2lt2-2.0o
o
14
E BlllPancake North Naples Fire 597-322j2 blllpancake@co]llerBsv.net
-
E Br.ndi Pollard Utlllg lmpact fl 2524237 bra n dipollard e colll€rEov. net
E Fred Relgdrl, AlcP Zonlng S€rvlccs ?52{'2t7 fredrEischl@colllergov.net
E Brett nosenblum, P.E.Uulity Plan Revle! t 2s2-290S brettro5enblum@collietgov.net
! Edwln sandrq Fire Revlew 252-7517 edwinsanchez@colllerBov.net
O mtchaelsaryer Transponation PlannlnE E2-2925 michaelsawyer@colllerBov.net
E corty sdrmldt, Al@ Comprehenslve PE!4!ng 2s2-294 corbFdmutgcolllcrgw.net
E OirlrS<ott, AICP PlannlnS and Zonlng 252-2460 chrls.rcott@colli!r8ov.net
D Peter shawlnskY ArEhltectu6l R€vlew 2524523 Petershawlnsky@cDlllerBov,n€t
E Dr.r"t s.t h/'c,Zoning ServLE!2524312 danlel$nlth@colller8ov.net
D -Blen Summers PlanninE and zonlng 2s2-ro32 Ellensummcrs@olllerBov.net
ts S.on Ston"Asslstant CountY Attomey 252{4m s€lttston€ @colllerBov.net
E l"ta* str.in Hearint Examlner/CCPC 2l24445 marlcsuirlnecollieBqv.net
E chad sweet Transportadon 252-56A7 dladsweet@colllerogv.net
E Mark Templetori Landscape 252-2475 marltempleton @colllerBov.net
E Jon walsh Bulldlns Review 2522952 ionat}lanwalsh@colllrrrov.net
E Davld wreks, Al@ Compr€h€n!ive Planning 252-2306 daYidneeks@colllerBov.net
E xlrsten wilkle EnvironmentSl Rarlew 252-5518 kirstenwllkle@collieBolr.net
! christlne wlllouEhw Plannlns and Zonlnt 2l2-574a ChrlstineWlloushby@colllerfov.net
Name Repr€eentln!Phone Em.ll
{m.=oi< R*e C"urbe- ?;rrwrarcs zvqt\rl?itc @cani-:r,a*ror.gd,tts -co
latttuK ltlfev U ,h./,401s fu ll u,( u tr tttr ifl,/tr fttA -(
7*rc- 't-lotlttiE
OOllIEf, GOUNTY GOT/ERN'I'E]\IT
GROWTH MA AGC'I/IEI{T DEPAftTTIET{T
wwu.collhlrov.nat
2t00 onrH HoRllESl{OE DRIVE
t{APt.ES, FLORIDA :ltlloil
(zr9l ziz-2roo fAx: (2391 252{35t
Prs,Appllcatlon M€cting end Final Submlttal RequlEmcnt Checkllst lon
3 G.3 of the Admlnlstrative Code
nre following Submtttel Requlrement checklH ls to be utlllzed duriq thc Prc-Appllcatlon Mectlng and at
tlme of appllcatbn submltEl. At flnel submlttal the drecklkt b to be completed and submitted wlth the
agpllcadoi pectet. Plrase pfdrldc the submlttal ltclrE ln th. Gxact odcr llsted belorv, wEh @er sh€ets
each s€ctlon.wlll
ADDMO AL REqUIRHTiENN' K'R IHE PUBUC HEARII'G PROCESS:
. Followlng the complrtlon of th€ rc\rlew ProcEss by @unty islrw stafr, the ePPlhant shall
submh all matBrlals electroohally to the deslgnated prcJect manater.
. Pleale cont ct thc proJect man8ger to confltm the number of addttbnal copbs rcquircd.
REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW
Project Narrattue, lndudlB a detalled descrlPtbn of propo3ed changEs
Re\rlsed Master Plan & 1 Reduced
as revlsed wlth amended Tltle PaBe.with Oldlnancc f
of8,4ln.x11ln.
Electronlc copy of all documents and plans
'Please adyke: The Offlce of the Hearln8 Examlner rcquire3 all materlals
to b€ submltted electronicallY h PoF format'
ln lmmokal.! or 3cckht rffordrbtc holl3ln& lndudc an addldonal i€t of e.ch iubmltltl
6lt7l20t5 Page 4 of 5
"ffirC-auw-.-'e-
COTI}ER CDUNTY GOVER'{MEI{T
GiOWTH MAI{AoEMENT DEPAATUEI{T
ww.tollllrrorr.nat
2S00 omH HOnSESHOE DRIVE
IIAPIIS, FIORIDA 3IIO4
12391 52-2rm FAx: (2391 2526iltt
PtA'{ GNS - IIDrcATE IF THE PETMO'{ I{EEOS TO BG ROUTED IO THE FOTTOWiIG REVIEWEf,S:
FEE BEQUIREMEI{TS
ruD Ar€rdmsnt lnEubct ntl.l (PDll: S1,5q''00 lzz5*aPlGApPllcauon Macdnt: S5O0.o0PlcApPllcauon Macsng: )x ,.r ,
ftUriiJ rrs"f a6r"rddq lrc for thc ffic! ol tlu Hcrrlru Ermlner: Sga5fi
The completed appllcatlon, all requlled submhtal matedaq and fees shall be submltted to:
Growth Management DepartmenVPlannlng and Retulatlon
ATTl,l : Buslnecs Center
2Eoo North Horseshoe Drive
NaPles, FL 34104
Appllcanvowner Sltnature Date
6pttcanVo-n". ttame (Please Prlnt)
P8t! 5 of 5
o
6177l20rs
CO1UER GOUNTY GOVERNi'IE'IIT
GROWTH MAT{AG EMET{T OEPARTMEIIT
Yrww.colll3rlov'net
2TtO I{OEIH HORIiESHOE DRIVE
I|APIES, FITORIDA 34104
(239) Zt2-2400 FArc (Bel2s2-53s8
lf no, please exPlaln:
Has a pubfic hearing been held on thls propertywithin the last year?flves flno
lf yes, ln whose name?
Has any portion of the PUD been E sOto andlor f] oweloefot
Are any changes proposed for the area sold andlor developed? [ Ves
!f yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet'
Eno
6177l201s Page 3 of 5
JUSTIF'ICATION AIYD NARRATIVE
PDI - SABAL BAY MPTID
REVISED 5-18-2017
Beckground:
Sabal Bay MPUD was approved by the Collier County Commission on November 15,2005. The PUD is
2,426.08 acres in size and allows for up to 1,999 dwelling on 1,5E5 acres as well as several other non-
residential uses, include some 75 acres of commercial development allowing up to 200,000 square feet of
retail, 60,000 square feet of office and 250 hotel rooms. The commercial development is primarily
located along the U.S. 4l frontage (Tracts COl, COz, and CO3, depicted on the PUD master plan). All of
the commeroial tracts have been platted (Sabal Bay Commercial Tract). PUD Tract COI is fully
developed. TractCO2 is partially developed. Tract CO3 has one outparcel developed.
PUD Exhibit C provides for deviations from the LDC, including deviations from certain sigrr regulations
(Section 5.06.00), but does not provide for a specific deviation that would allow for more than one
Directory Sign along the PUD's commercial fiontage on Tamiami Trail.
The LDC defines Directory Srgp as follows:
Direcloty sign: A sign located al lhe enlrance to a multiple-occupancy Porcel or mulliple parcels develoPed tnder
o unified plan of development. This sign may be a freestanding (pole, monument or ground), owning, or wall sign-
Section 5.05.04.F.3. reads as follows:
Directory Signs. Mulliple-ocatpancy porcels or multiple porcels developed under a unlfied tlevelopmcnl plotr,
with o niniiun of I iidependenl units, and containing 20,000 square feet or ntore of leasable tloor orea
ct. The mcimum heightfor directory signs is linited to 2?feet. Height shall be measuredfi'om the lowest
centerline grodc iltne nearest prblic or private rlghl-of-way or eoscmcnl to the uppermosl portion of
the slgn slruclurc.
I
and Nanativc 05-I8-I7.docx
ABAL BAYMPUq..-,
MPUD MASTER PLAN
H:U0 I 7\20 I 70u\WAPDnlst
o
I zGritr (rrrrL{ - tr r-r
@mmerciC Tncts along Tamlaml Trafl Eln
tl.
Dlrectoty signs shall hot be closer thon l0leer rt'oht the prope y line, filess orherwise hoted below ot at
providedfa.
Moximut ollowable sign orua: 200 squareleel lor dircctory tl1 rs .
A ninimum 100 sqtor.e loot landscoping ot ea sholl be provided around the base of dry db.clor! slgn .
By definition, a Directory sign may be a pole, monument or ground sign. one Directory sign exists at the
entruce to the shops at Hammock cove, betweeu PUD Tracts co2 and co3, and another Directory sign
exists at the Thomasson Drive entrance to the Shoppe at Hammock Cove. This deviation would allow for
a third Directory sign to be located on uS 41 (Tamiami rrail Esst) at tbe entrance to the next phase, as
depicted below.
thomasson
Shoppes at Hammock Cove Shoppcs at Hartrmock Cove
The commercial ftontage of the Sabal Bay MPUD along Tamiami rrail (u.s. 4l ) is l,55or fe€t. This pDI
seeks to allow for one additional Directory Sign, to be located at the entr8nce to PUD Commercial Tract
CO3. The proposed location is depicted below. The ingresVegress design at this location anticipated one
additional Directory sign at this location, similar in size and scale to the two existing pole signs (see
pictures above).
The following language (underlined) is proposed to be added to the Sabal Bay PUD, Section 2.,17
JuEtificrtion:
As stated, there are two existing DirEctory signs; one is located at the project entrance to the Shoppes at
Hammock Cove on Thomasson Drive, and one is located at the proje.ct entrance to the Shoppes at
Hammock Cove on Tamiami Trail East. This request is to Ellow another pole sign at the second entrance
(to serve the next phsse of the Shopping Center development, approximately 525 feer to the east on
Tamiami Trail East. ln hind sight, this r€quest should have been made at time the Sabal Bay MPUD was
approved in 2005; however, the need for the additional sign really bec.ame clear once thc commercial
2
and Namrivc 05-l&l7.docrH:U0l 7u0 17004\WnPDIU st
tracts were platted. The Sabal Bay MPUD commercial frontage (on Thomasson and Tamiami Trail
oombiled) contains more than 2,500 linear feet or road frontage. The additional Directory sign is
nec€ssary to allow for reasonable signage to support the uses located within this phase of the commerpial
development. This is a master planned community and the signage will be consistent with the existing
sip desigrr and will meet all required dimensional stadards of the LDC. The requested sip will
enhance the marketability of the parcels located in this phase of the commercial development and will
allow easy identification of the businesses within tris phase for the public seeking to locate such
businesses.
3
HUO17\2Ol7OO+\WnPDI\lstRcsubsaittaNustificaionurdNarntiw0S-I8'17'&d
Sabal Bay Slgns PDI
Distance between direcbry sighs
L.Oand
Q,,oo",
oke.tory Sign
0r,o**
Dlrtctory sgnIY'{
\'
earth
t
nisrEf
o
TENANT
SPACE
rl
I
r
fq
I7 EYEI
Shops at
Hammock Cove
I I I
I
/I!
HEXNO.20rs-09
IIEARING EXI\MIhIER DECISION
PETITION NO. PDI-PL20f400@f 03 - CDC Land Invcstnents, Inc,, Collier Land
Dcvelopmcng Inc., and ['tfth Thlrd Benk rcquest rn lnsubstutial chuge to the Sabal Bay
Mlxed Use Planned Unit Dcvelopment (cMP[rD"), Ordinance No, 05-59, as amendcd, to
increrse the marimum total si?f of ofiicc space in the CommercirUOffice Trac8 CiOl end
C/O2 from 40,000 to 60,000 square fecl and decrerse the Eaximum totrl rize of rct.il or
other commercirl uses in TracE C/OI strd C/O2 fiom 142,000 to 122,000 square feet; and
to sEend Erhibit A, thc MPUD Maoter Plrn, by adding an additionrl acceas polnt for
Trect CIOIi The subject prcperty ls locsted south of Thonasson Drivg south srd west of
U.S.41, aud north and west of Wentworth PLID, h Scctions 23,2,25,26 and 36,Township
50 South, Rruge 25 Esst, end Scction 19, Township 50 South, Range 26 Eart, Collicr
County, X'loridg consisting of 2,416 * acrec.
DATE OF HEARING: March 12,2015.
STAIT' RECOMMEhTDATION: Approval.
FIIYDINGS:
Based on the applicant's writlen petitioq testimony at the hearing of the applicant, aod the
recommcndation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the critsria set forft in Sections
10,02,13 E.l and 10.02.13 8.2 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition is
apprcved.
ANALYSIS:
At fte Neighborhood Informational Meeting (NIM) two members of the public were in
atrcndance. After the applicant's presentation at the NM, therc were no questions from the
public.
No members of the public were in atten.lqnc€ at this heaing and no letters of objection have
bccm rcceived.
DECISION:
The Hearing Examiner hereby aooroves Petition Number PDI-PL20140002103, filed by R.
Bruce Aaderson" Esq. of Roetzel & An&ess, and Burt L. Saunders, Esq. of Gray Robinson'
representing CDC Land Investments, Inc. aud Collier Iand Developm.ent, Inc. and Fiflt Thfud
Banlq with respect to the property as described in the Sabal Bay MPUD, Ordinaace No. 05-59,
as amendd for the followiag insubstaotial thangos:r to increase the maximum total size of office space in the Comm;rciayOffice Tracts C/Ol
and C/O2 from 40p00 to 60,000 square feeg
r to decrease the maximum total sizc of retail or other commercial uses in Tracts C/Ol aad
C/O2 from 142,000 to 122,000 squarc feot; and
. to amend Exhibit A, the MPUD Mast€r Plan, by adding an additional access point for
Tract C/Ol.
I l,lcPgol 39,V1 I X]92 VU36 I of2
SIGN.EOIIUNCINSIBICIIONS
(CHAPTER E, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DE\'ELOPMENT)
A zoning sign(s) must bc posted by the petitioner or lhe petitioncr's agedt on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) c8lcndar
days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's sgent through
the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below arc general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not
be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative
Code, Chapter E E.
I. The sign(s) musr be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest strect riSht-of-way or
easement.
The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other m€ans lo a wood frame or to a wood panel and then festened
securely lo I post, or other sbucture. The sign may not be af6xed to a trce or other foliage.
The petitioncr or th€ petitioncr's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action
has been heard and a final decision rcnd€rcd. Ifth€ sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the pctitioncr or the
petitioner's agenl must r€place the sign(s
NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTINC NOTICE SHOULD BE
RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (IO) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE
ASSIGNED PLANNER
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
STATE OF FLORIDA
COT]NTY OF COLLIER
BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT J. MULHERE, FAICP
WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HBSHE HAS POSTED PROPERNOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION IO,O3.OO OF THE
COLLIER COT,INTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NIMBERpnr pL2017000024?
950 ENCORE WAY
STREET OR P.O. BOX
NAPLES, FL 34110
The foregoing instrument was swom to and subscribed beforc me this-13-day od:!::g--, 2Ol1 , by
ROBERT .]. MI'LHERE personally known to me or who produced as identification
and who did/did not take an oath.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COI.'NTY OF COLLIER
My Commission ExPires:
(Stamp with serial number)
Rev 3/4i 2015
CITY, STATE ZIP
STEPHANIE KAROL
Printed Name of Notary Public
PDr PL2017000024?
TURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT
ROBERT J. MI'LHERE, FAICP
sltPt{Atlt uno[
Iotrry haxc . lBr ol f lIIl
Colrstlrh , tf ttOI
It Co i. :flm Ix t,2fl1,
rE==E=
=E
E
=
3
JE
=E== =E
E B=
=
i E=3= Eg
== =E
:= E=ii= ;r
== =s.Ei
====i =B
Er
==RE E==== E= EE EE
EE
=gE==
EE
=t
5E
====E
==
==
==
a= +3I== E=
=*
=
'*= E====. == * E
E=E=E=EE=E
-r=<atrg
-_E=
9,, uloE
=rtr,o
-J- lll
=EE
-
=
Cr
UI
--
Jo.
oF
eUJ-E<)-
,4 ('
t{1'
t
rif
IG:Et-. - j- -:4...V:{,:," -=
+
Exhibit "B"
ORDINANCE NO. 17 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 05-59, AS
AMENDED, THE SABAL BAY MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (MPUD), TO APPROVE AN INSUBSTANTIAL
CHANGE TO THE MPUD TO ADD ONE NEW DEVIATION
RELATING TO SIGNAGE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, APPROXIMATELY ONE
QUARTER MILE EAST OF THOMASSON DRIVE, IN SECTION 19,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF ±4.34 ACRES. [PDI-PL20170000247]
WHEREAS, on November 12, 2005, the Board of County Commissioners approved
Ordinance No. 05-59, which established the Sabal Bay Mixed Use Planned Unit Development zoning
district; and
WHEREAS, the Sabal Bay MPUD was subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 12-12, HEX
No. 2014-08, and HEX No. 2015-09; and
WHEREAS, Collier Land Development, Inc., represented by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, of
Hole Montes, Inc., filed a petition to request approval of an insubstantial change to the Sabal Bay
MPUD, which was approved by the Collier County Hearing Examiner as HEX No. 2017-27.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT C OF THE MPUD DOCUMENT
ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 05-59, AS AMENDED, THE SABAL
BAY MPUD.
Exhibit C, entitled "List of Deviations," of the MPUD document attached as Exhibit "A" to
Ordinance No. 05-59, as amended, the Sabal Bay MPUD, is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit C,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION TWO: EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County
Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2017.
[I 7 -CPS -01653/1369450/1 ]54
Sabal Bay PDI-PL20170000247110/9117
Page 1 of 2
Text underlined is added, text struok thfough is deleted.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By:
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legality:
Scott A. Stone
Assistant County Attorney
Exhibit C — List of Deviations
[I 7 -CPS -0 1653/1369450/1]54
Sabal Bay PDI-PL20170000247 / 10/9/1 7
Im
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PENNY TAYLOR, Chairman
A1 C3 / (-7 /)-�
Page 2 of 2
Text underlined is added; text stmea'� a k through is deleted.
OBJ
EXHIBIT "C"
LIST OF DEVIATIONS
Deviation 16 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.3., Directory Signs, which limits
multiple -occupancy_ parcels or multiple parcels developed under a unified development plan
with a minimum of 8 independent units, containing 20,000 s.f. or more of leasable floor area to a
maximum of one directory sign at one entrance on each public street to allow for one additional
directory sign on Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41) in addition to the two existing director signs
(located on Tamiami Trail East and Thomasson Drive). The second directory sign permitted on
the Tamiami Trail East frontage shall be located a minimum of 500 feet to the east of the existing
directory sign on Tamiami Trail East.
Page 1 of 1
Words underlined are added; words struck t#reugh are deletions
H:\2017\2017004\WP\PD1\3rd Resubmittal\Sabal Bay MPUD (PD1-PL20170000247) (8-1-2017).docx
9
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the
Collier County Board of County Commissioners on December
12th, 2017, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,
Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail
East, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will
consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting
will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance
is as follows:
The purpose of the hearing is to consider:
U)
Uj
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0. 05-599 AS
AMENDED, THE SABAL BAY MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT
Z
DEVELOPMENT (MPUD), TO APPROVE AN INSUBSTANTIAL
TO ADD ONE NEW DEVIATION
>-
A
CHANGE TO THE MPUD
RELATING TO SIGNAGE, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
®
tee
SIDE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, APPROXIMATELY ONE
QUARTER MILE EAST OF THOMASSON DRIVE, IN SECTION
W
19, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
'j
ti
FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF ±4.34 ACRES. [PDI-PL20170000247]
Z
Z
A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the
Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are
invited to attend and be heard.
-
NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must
0
N
register with the County manager prior to presentation of
the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be
N
limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual
Nito
speak on behalf of an organization or group s encouraged.
If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or
`a
m
organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item.
wPersons
wishing to have written or graphic materials included in
>
the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum
0
of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case,
Z
written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall
�.:
be submitted to' the appropriate County staff a minimum of
in
seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used
®
before the Board will become a permanent part
un
oPresentations
f the record.
W
Z
Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board
®
will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and
therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony an
evidence upon which the appeal is based.
If you area person with a disability who needs any accommodation
iorder tparticipate in this proceeding, youare entitled, at
no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact the CollierCounty Facilities Management Division,
located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-
53569 (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior, to the meeting.
Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available
in the Board of County Commissioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PENNY TAYLOR, CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
Novevember 22, 2017 No.1828255