Backup Documents 10/24/2017 Item #11EBCC Beach Parking Presentation
October 24, 2017
Interlocal Agreements
•For over 30 years, the City of Naples and Collier County have maintained seamless
beach parking integration.
•Current 2008 agreement runs through September 30, 2018
•Allows free beach parking for all County residents at City and County beaches, and
use of parks and recreation programs on “same terms and conditions”
•In consideration for the use of City facilities by non-City residents, the County issues
an annual payment of $1,000,000 plus or minus an adjustment indexed to the City’s
relative payment of taxes to the County’s General Fund.
•The FY 2017 payment, including the adjustment factor, is expected to be $1,137,864.
Item 16.D.21 –November 18, 2008
2008 Interlocal Agreement
•Allows all residents of Collier County to utilize free parking at County
and City beaches.
2008 Interlocal Agreement
•Added Parks & Recreation and called for “same terms and conditions” –
parity.
2003 Interlocal Agreement
•Qualified percentage of City’s net loss for beach fund
•In FY18: $0.
Naples Beach Fund Budgets
Year Revenue Expense Net Revenue Interlocal
Allocation Cost Recovery
FY 2008 $ 1,441,510 $ 1,441,315 $ 195 $500,000 100%
FY 2017 $ 1,751,400 $ 2,111,992 $ (360,592)$0 83%
FY 2018 $ 2,565,790 $ 2,381,948 $ 183,842 $0 108%
*Based on data at March 7 workshop and City FY 16-17 and FY 17-18 City budgets
Beach Fund Observations
•Naples Beach Fund is healthier than in 2008 when agreement was signed
•Revenues have kept pace with expenses
•Surplus projected in Naples Beach Fund in FY 2018
•Parking spaces
•City claims 1,300 beach parking spaces
•290 spaces that City counts are “pure” beach parking –compete with retail and residential demand
•County has 1,498 spaces vs. 1,010 City
•Economic Impacts
•Beach-goers have a positive impact on City of Naples businesses
The City designated beach parking,
indicated in yellow, must compete with
retail and residential parking needs.
Access Point Concessions Playground Shower Restroom Parking Spots
Barefoot Beach Access No No Yes No 96
Barefoot Preserve Yes Yes Yes Yes 401
Bluebill Beach No No Yes Yes 0
Conner Park No No No No 158
Vanderbilt Beach Yes No Yes Yes 357
Clam Pass Yes No Yes Yes 171
North Gulfshore Beach No No No No 38
Tigertail Beach Yes Yes No Yes 210
South Marco Beach No No No No 67
Total 4 2 5 5 1498
Parks & Recreation Cost Recovery
•Fee-based revenues in relation to total expenses for Parks & Recreation programs
•A 2011 Joint Study with City and County Staff concluded that:
•“about 80% of the participants in [some] City programs are residents of the County and not the
City. However, these are fee based programs, and if the program is self-sustaining on a
“programs pay for programs” basis, it should be immaterial where the resident resides.”
•“…. the two entities should review the ratio of cost recovery for programs to seek as much parity
as possible.”
City of Naples FY16-17 Parks Budgets
Year Revenue Expense Net Revenue Interlocal
Payment Cost Recovery
FY 2017 $ 748,110 $ 3,122,025 $ (2,373,915)$0 24%
FY 2017 $ 1,098,110 $ 3,122,025 $ (1,773,915)$350,000 35%
FY 2017 $ 1,885,974 $ 3,122,025 $ (1,236,051)$1,137,864*60%
Notes: Collier County Parks & Recreation cost recovery enterprise-wide was approximately 35% in FY 2017.
The County payment under the agreement for the FY 2017 period, including the adjustment factor, is expected
to be $1,137,864.
*Based on data at March 7 workshop and City of Naples FY 16-17 adopted budget
Recreation Program Usage
•FY15 County Programs
•Total Usage: 102,432
•FY15-16 City Programs
•Total Usage: 16,209
•City served approx. 13% of Collier
County users
16209
102432
City County
Park Fund Observations
•Collier County Parks and Recreation cost recovery 35% enterprise-wide in FY 2017.
•A payment of $350k would bring City Parks and Recreation programs on parity with
the County.
•2008 Interlocal Agreement included parks and recreation programs.
•Resulted in payment increase from prior Interlocal Agreements.
•County and City programs continue similar cost recovery in FY 2018.
•The concept of cost parity in Parks and Recreation programs was reaffirmed in a
2011 joint study between the City and County.
Non-Resident Pass Elimination
•One possible solution to help meet the City’s demand to increase revenue would be
the elimination of the non-resident parking pass.
•Non-residents can currently purchase an annual pass for $50, and forego payment of
daily fees of $8/daily at County beaches, or $2.50/hr. at City beaches.
•In 2016, the County issued 9,916 beach parking stickers to non-residents. According
to City data, they issued 900 more.
Additional Revenue from Non-residents
NR Permits Issued Parking Fee Yearly Visits
City 900 $2.50/hr 10
County 9,916 $8/day 10 Possible Revenue
Totals 10,816 $9*10 $973,440
•If a non-resident were to average 10 visits to the beach per year, elimination of the
pass could generate approximately $1,000,000 in revenue per year based on daily
parking fees for the City and County.
•Caveats
•Impossible to accurately project demand of beach parking with increased rates
*Average of $2.50/hr. x 4hrs for City, with $8 daily County fee
City
•Collier County to provide $1,500,000 annually to the
City, effective January 1, 2018.
•Free parking permitted at all Naples public beach
parking spaces. Applicable to the residents of the
City and unincorporated Collier County.
•No sale or distribution of non-resident beach passes,
effective immediately upon acceptance of this
proposal. Applicable to the City and Collier County.
•Does not include terms on Parks & Recreation.
•New interlocal agreement to replace the existing
agreement for a term of three years, beginning
January 1, 2018.
County
•Collier County to provide $1,250,000 annually to the
City.
•Free parking permitted at all Naples public beach
parking spaces. Applicable to the residents of the City
and unincorporated Collier County.
•No sale or distribution of non-resident beach passes,
effective immediately upon formal acceptance of this
proposal. Applicable to the City and Collier County.
•Continue to make Parks & Recreation Programs
available to unincorporated area residents on the same
terms and conditions as City of Naples residents.
•New interlocal agreement to replace the existing
agreement for a term of five years.
Net effects of City proposal
•Increased cost of Interlocal payment to $1.5 million
•Estimated gain of revenue to City projected at approximately $862,000.
•Lost revenue from sale non-resident pass ($495,800 in FY16) to County Parks & Recreation compared to
minimal loss for City.
•Possible recovery of revenues through daily parking fees if projected total split evenly.
•No terms on Parks and Recreation
•Disparate user fees could be established for City parks programs against County residents.
•Addition of parks and recreation terms reason behind increased payment in 2008 Interlocal Agreement.
•Renegotiation in 3 years.
BCC Beach Parking Presentation
October 24, 2017
Interlocal Agreements
•For over 30 years, the City of Naples and Collier County have maintained seamless
beach parking integration.
•Current 2008 agreement runs through September 30, 2018
•Allows free beach parking for all County residents at City and County beaches, and
use of parks and recreation programs on “same terms and conditions”
•In consideration for the use of City facilities by non-City residents, the County issues
an annual payment of $1,000,000 plus or minus an adjustment indexed to the City’s
relative payment of taxes to the County’s General Fund.
•The FY 2017 payment, including the adjustment factor, is expected to be $1,137,864.
Item 16.D.21 –November 18, 2008
2008 Interlocal Agreement
•Allows all residents of Collier County to utilize free parking at County
and City beaches.
2008 Interlocal Agreement
•Added Parks & Recreation and called for “same terms and conditions” –
parity.
2003 Interlocal Agreement
•Qualified percentage of City’s net loss for beach fund
•In FY18: $0.
Naples Beach Fund Budgets
Year Revenue Expense Net Revenue Interlocal
Allocation Cost Recovery
FY 2008 $ 1,441,510 $ 1,441,315 $ 195 $500,000 100%
FY 2017 $ 1,751,400 $ 2,111,992 $ (360,592)$0 83%
FY 2018 $ 2,565,790 $ 2,381,948 $ 183,842 $0 108%
*Based on data at March 7 workshop and City FY 16-17 and FY 17-18 City budgets
Beach Fund Observations
•Naples Beach Fund is healthier than in 2008 when agreement was signed
•Revenues have kept pace with expenses
•Surplus projected in Naples Beach Fund in FY 2018
•Parking spaces
•City claims 1,300 beach parking spaces
•290 spaces that City counts are “pure” beach parking –compete with retail and residential demand
•County has 1,498 spaces vs. 1,010 City
•Economic Impacts
•Beach-goers have a positive impact on City of Naples businesses
The City designated beach parking,
indicated in yellow, must compete with
retail and residential parking needs.
Access Point Concessions Playground Shower Restroom Parking Spots
Barefoot Beach Access No No Yes No 96
Barefoot Preserve Yes Yes Yes Yes 401
Bluebill Beach No No Yes Yes 0
Conner Park No No No No 158
Vanderbilt Beach Yes No Yes Yes 357
Clam Pass Yes No Yes Yes 171
North Gulfshore Beach No No No No 38
Tigertail Beach Yes Yes No Yes 210
South Marco Beach No No No No 67
Total 4 2 5 5 1498
Parks & Recreation Cost Recovery
•Fee-based revenues in relation to total expenses for Parks & Recreation programs
•A 2011 Joint Study with City and County Staff concluded that:
•“about 80% of the participants in [some] City programs are residents of the County and not the
City. However, these are fee based programs, and if the program is self-sustaining on a
“programs pay for programs” basis, it should be immaterial where the resident resides.”
•“…. the two entities should review the ratio of cost recovery for programs to seek as much parity
as possible.”
City of Naples FY16-17 Parks Budgets
Year Revenue Expense Net Revenue Interlocal
Payment Cost Recovery
FY 2017 $ 748,110 $ 3,122,025 $ (2,373,915)$0 24%
FY 2017 $ 1,098,110 $ 3,122,025 $ (1,773,915)$350,000 35%
FY 2017 $ 1,885,974 $ 3,122,025 $ (1,236,051)$1,137,864*60%
Notes: Collier County Parks & Recreation cost recovery enterprise-wide was approximately 35% in FY 2017.
The County payment under the agreement for the FY 2017 period, including the adjustment factor, is expected
to be $1,137,864.
*Based on data at March 7 workshop and City of Naples FY 16-17 adopted budget
Recreation Program Usage
•FY15 County Programs
•Total Usage: 102,432
•FY15-16 City Programs
•Total Usage: 16,209
•City served approx. 13% of Collier
County users
16209
102432
City County
Park Fund Observations
•Collier County Parks and Recreation cost recovery 35% enterprise-wide in FY 2017.
•A payment of $350k would bring City Parks and Recreation programs on parity with
the County.
•2008 Interlocal Agreement included parks and recreation programs.
•Resulted in payment increase from prior Interlocal Agreements.
•County and City programs continue similar cost recovery in FY 2018.
•The concept of cost parity in Parks and Recreation programs was reaffirmed in a
2011 joint study between the City and County.
Non-Resident Pass Elimination
•One possible solution to help meet the City’s demand to increase revenue would be
the elimination of the non-resident parking pass.
•Non-residents can currently purchase an annual pass for $50, and forego payment of
daily fees of $8/daily at County beaches, or $2.50/hr. at City beaches.
•In 2016, the County issued 9,916 beach parking stickers to non-residents. According
to City data, they issued 900 more.
Additional Revenue from Non-residents
NR Permits Issued Parking Fee Yearly Visits
City 900 $2.50/hr 10
County 9,916 $8/day 10 Possible Revenue
Totals 10,816 $9*10 $973,440
•If a non-resident were to average 10 visits to the beach per year, elimination of the
pass could generate approximately $1,000,000 in revenue per year based on daily
parking fees for the City and County.
•Caveats
•Impossible to accurately project demand of beach parking with increased rates
*Average of $2.50/hr. x 4hrs for City, with $8 daily County fee
City
•Collier County to provide $1,500,000 annually to the
City, effective January 1, 2018.
•Free parking permitted at all Naples public beach
parking spaces. Applicable to the residents of the
City and unincorporated Collier County.
•No sale or distribution of non-resident beach passes,
effective immediately upon acceptance of this
proposal. Applicable to the City and Collier County.
•Does not include terms on Parks & Recreation.
•New interlocal agreement to replace the existing
agreement for a term of three years, beginning
January 1, 2018.
County
•Collier County to provide $1,250,000 annually to the
City.
•Free parking permitted at all Naples public beach
parking spaces. Applicable to the residents of the City
and unincorporated Collier County.
•No sale or distribution of non-resident beach passes,
effective immediately upon formal acceptance of this
proposal. Applicable to the City and Collier County.
•Continue to make Parks & Recreation Programs
available to unincorporated area residents on the same
terms and conditions as City of Naples residents.
•New interlocal agreement to replace the existing
agreement for a term of five years.
Net effects of City proposal
•Increased cost of Interlocal payment to $1.5 million
•Estimated gain of revenue to City projected at approximately $862,000.
•Lost revenue from sale non-resident pass ($495,800 in FY16) to County Parks & Recreation compared to
minimal loss for City.
•Possible recovery of revenues through daily parking fees if projected total split evenly.
•No terms on Parks and Recreation
•Disparate user fees could be established for City parks programs against County residents.
•Addition of parks and recreation terms reason behind increased payment in 2008 Interlocal Agreement.
•Renegotiation in 3 years.
1 1 F
x) z
CD I.t) CD X" ,
-cs co
...,
CD CD
C') cD 1
—,
la 0 :3
a-.4. x.ii0
a
CO *
= as Ci.i
1.1.7 > Cl) to I a)
0 m -,,u
› 0 CD 0-7;
r0
F-▪ rn r_ 0..!-- FL-- ::-.71.: ,,/---
'--) K — 0 co Fi9 5 -4-- i 3
0 co m c 143, = 1 D
Ce)
---- te,,,,....----
--I ..,,p,
0 * '
C) z (7 5 r-1M Cl) m = -----
.....
0 z •--• -6 n 1 z
0 - 0
r-• - 7) > 0 i- .,.-
--1 c n ,a 1 = '2:3' ,(4•.. 2 (re'. i J
1
73 m ''' (\r
M.
010 -1,...., ......... Fri i...,„ 0
•,-. i A
d 1 ,--
7,:-...... co ,-
c;) 6 ›, — -I co r-\ 1 • CO
-n z = --‹ c., , ,,_
CD
= m
isi I s4
-I 0> 0 n m 7-4-..T.-I 7a 0 7a < --
..1 m cp
. ., =
-7
CI women
CO Fil— Cn 'n --H F-1.- TZ 0
0 x c rn 0 02, ct)
—1 cn K 7) o .r..c., 0
00 2 >70 -2-`-' c3
.7
1)5'. "0
rilit fi rrri
-n 7n g ---1 0 (0., c)
— CI
m ,„
o23 [1:3 z mg ,=-, m .
-n ° El --4 '11 -i c-.)
E: (-:
---1 0 ,-, cn 5 r=
= --i ,-=',., > .3ti 7,...' (...n
ni 0 ' .33P C3 =1 >
. .e., m z J..
0 ,- 0 --:-.--- O 0
> , m -, ...-,
F z > c...- --(.51 r2, 0
(f) 44- -i , -4_ c, 41-.4 j4 4-4
OW M ,I =. '
1 Pr13 CG M (n "r:3 l'-) (7) 1C-1 ,-..
,.,
-0 > m -.1 . -•• o ..-4=' 7.1
0 m VI
I1
i,./ -
rA ='
cn ___Iw 0 0 2
m0 * 0 0G4), 71 iv
• r-- ,-, 73 r, - u
I ) t'
z < z Cy) c) 0:1 > (
> >
0 = G) 0 >, xi r- \V
r- rri ni Z ffl 0 r- '1'1 t
rn 1:1 -±-- 1-- K 0 1--
C)
‘,-..,,
r 7
i'""'
'''‹ illM• t-7,
t4 al 1 -4 r.
-I -H 1- ,
-‹ .---
,.- 1
I '
E X ---0 'r
G) >
-j
rs)
.s.,
, .
. i
' I