Loading...
CCPC Minutes 07/18/2003 RJuly 18, 2003 TRANSCRIPTION OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida, July 18, 2003 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:30 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Chairman: Kenneth Abernathy Mark Strain Dwight Richardson Lora dean Young Brad Schiffer David Wolfley ALSO PRESENT: David Week, Marjorie Student, Paul White, Don Scott, Stan Litsinger Page 1 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, JULY'17, 2003, 1N THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZ~.D BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH .THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 5, 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES BCC REPORT- RECAPS: JUNE 10, 2003 AND JUNE 24, 2003 CHAIRMAN'S REPORT ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Ao BD-2003-AR-3847, Miles Scofield, of Scofield Marine Consulting, representing Peter Guglielmi, requesting a boathouse on an existing dock.. The dock extends 23 feet out into the waterway; however, the proposed boathouse would extend only 20 feet. Property to be considered is located at 119 Heron Avenue, Lot 25, Block T, Conners Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit 3, in Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordimttor: Ross Gochenaur) Bo PUDZ-2002-AR-2g41, Richard Woodruff, AICP, of WiisonMiller, Inc., and R. Bruce Anderson, Esq., of Young, van Assenderp, Vamadoe and Anderson P.A., representing U.S. Home Corporation, requesting a rezone from 'A" rural agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Heritage Bay DR//PUD for a maximum of 3,450 residential dwelling units, 50,000 square feet of office uses, 150,000 square feet of retail uses, and Assisted Living Facility containing up to 200 units for property, located on the northeast comer of Inh~tokalee Road and Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), in Sections 13, 14, 23 and 24, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Coliier County, Florida, consisting of 2,562~ acres. (COMPANION ITEM TO DPd-2000-01) (Coordinator: Ray Bellows) DRI-2000-01, Alan D. Reynolds, AICP, of. WiisonMiller, Inc., and R. Brace Anderson, Esq., of Young, van Assenderp, Varnadoe, and Anderson P.A., representing U.S. Home Corporation, requesting approval of a "DRI" Development of Regional Impact to be known as Heritage Bay DR/, for a maximum of 3,450 residential dwelling units, 200 assisted living units, a $4-hole golf course and related facilities, three neighborhood town centers to contain up to 40,000 sq. ft. of building space, and a maximum of 200,000 sq. fl. of commercial uses of which 50,000 sq. ft. is limited to offices, for property located on the northeast quadrant of Immokalee Road (C.R. 846) and Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), in Sections 13, 14, 23, and 24, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 2,562+ acres. (Coordinator: Ray Bellows) D. PUDZ-2003-AR-3607, Will/am L. Hoover, AICP, of Hoover Planning & Development, Inc., representing Barton and Wendy Mclntyre and $oseph Magdalen,r, requesting changes to the existing Nicaea Academy PUD zoning. The proposed changes to the PUD document and Master Plan will eliminate the uses of private school and assisted living facility and allow for a maximum of 580 residential dwelling units. The property to be considered for this rezon is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard just south of the Crystal Lake PUD (RV Park), in Section 26, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier Count~ Florida. This property consists of 119+ acres. (Coordinator: Fred Reischl) E. CPSS-2003-01: A Small Scale Amendment, amending the Future Land Use Element, Map of Activity Center #16, by increasing the existing N.W. quadrant acreage by .99 acres. [Coordinator: John David Moss] F. PUDZ-2002-AR-31Sl, Michael R. Fernandez, AICP, of Planning Development, Inc., representing Richard $. Santerre, Trustee, requesting a rezone from "C-3" and "RMF-6" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Miller Square PUD for a maximum of 20,000 square feet of commercial use, for property located at the northeast comer of U.S. 41 East and Shadowlawn Drive, in Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Fred Reischl/Mike Bosi) PUDZ-2003-AR-3605, William L. Hoover, AICP of Hoover Planning and Development, Inc., representing Gulf Coast Commercial Corporation, requesting a rezone from a "RMF-6" zoning district to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) district to be known as the Botanical Place PUD. This project will consist ofa maximtun of 218 multi-family dwelling units of which 64 dwelling units are required to be affordable subject to the approval of the companion Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement. The property 1~ be considered for this rezone is located on the eastern side of Bayshore Drive, approximately 800 feet north of Thomasson Drive, further described as Lots 105 and 106, Naples Grove and Truck Co.'s Little Farm #2, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. This property consists of 19.83 + acres. (Coordinator: Ray Bellows) CU-2002-AR=3537, Nick Stewart, of Stewart Mining Industries, requesting Conditional Use "I" for e '.anluV/ning in the "A-MHO" Rural Agricultural - Mobile Home Overlay zoning district pursuant to Section 2.2.2.3 of th~ Collier County Land Development Code for property located in Sections 18 and 19, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Fred ReiscM) PUDA-2002-AR-247~, $. Gary Butler, PE, of Butler Engineering, Inc., representing Bayswater Falling Waters LLC, requesting a rezone from "E", Estates, and PUD, Falling Waters PUD, to increase acreage of the existing Falling Waters PUD from 134.04 to 161.54, change density from 6 dwelling units per acre to 4.95 per acre, and show a change in property ownership, for property located south of Davis Boulevard and west ol~ the proposed alignment of Santa Barbara Boulevard in Section 8, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 161.$4:t: acres. (Coordinator: Fred Reischi/Kay Deselem) PUDZ-2002-AR-2863, Karen Bishop, of PMS Inc. of Naples, representing John A. Pulling, Jr. and Lucy G. Finch, requesting a rezone from "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Longview Center PUD for a maximum of $6 residential dwelling units, a maximum of 73,000 square feet of mixed retail and service uses and a maximum of 70,000 square feet of medical and/or general off'ice space for property lo~ated at the northeast and southeast corner of Airport-Pulling Road and Orange Blossom Road, in Section 1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 14.73± acres. (Coordinator: Fred Reischl) - K. 2003 Cycle GMP Amendment Petitio,, CPSP-2003-4: Amending the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) to add a new policy referencing the two Interlocal Agreements adopted in May 2003 by the Collier County School Board and the Board of County Commissioners; referencing the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Series depicting existing and future school sites and school support facilities; referencing a map of existing school and school support facilities in the FLUE support document; and, identif3~ng zoning districts which allow and which do not allow school and school support facilities. Amending the FLUM Series to add new maps depicting sites upon which schools and school support facilities are located, and depicting undeveloped sites for future schools and school support facilities. Amending the Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) to refer to the two Interlocal Agreements adopted in May 2003 between the Collier County School Board and the Board of County Commissioners. Amending the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to reference the two Interlocal Agreements adopted in May 2003 between the Collier County School Board and the Board of County Commissioners and to cross-reference the FLUE and ICE policies and FLUM series. Amending the Immokalee Area Master Plan to reference the two Interlocal Agreements adopted in May 2003 between the Collier County School Board and the Board of County Commissioners and to cross-reference the FLUE and ICE policies and FLUM Series. [Coordinator: David Weeks] CPSP-2003-5, Petition requesting text amendments to the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Future Land Use Element and the Recreation and Open Space Element in order to incorporate the Community Character/Smart Growth principles adopted by the Community Character/Smart Growth Advisory Committee. [Coordinator: John David Moss] CPSP-2003-6, Petition requesting the adoption of the County Manatee Protection Plan (MPP) and the amendment of the goals, objectives and poliei~ of the County's Conservation and Coastal Management Element and the Future Land Use Element to establish the Manatee Protection Plan (MPP). [Coordinator: Darren Murphy] CPSP-2003-7, Petition requesting the adoption of a new Economic Development Element including goals, objectives and policies to the Growth Management Plan. [Coordinator: John David Moss & Randy Cohen] CPSP-2003-8, Petition requesting amendments to the Capital Improvement Element (CIE), Transportation Element, and Future Land Use Element to revise Transportation Concurrency Management policies to establish a real time checkbook concurrency management system; to establish two (2) Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMA), and to adopt a Map of the proposed TCMA within the Urban Designated Area on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM); to establish a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCF_X), and to adopt a Map of the proposed TCEA within the Urban Designated Area on the FLUM; and to.hdd policies providing for fairshare developer contributions, to the Multimodal Transportation Work Program of a TCMA when directly impacting a deficient road segment. [Coordinator: Start Litsinger] 11. 12. 13. CPSP-2003-9, Petition requesting change to Overlays and Special Features of the Land Use Designation Description Section of the Future Land Use Element, to change certain noise contours as previously changed by Land Development Code amendment on June 14, 2000. [Coordinator: Marcia Kendall] OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS: THERE WILL BE NO CCPC MEETING ON THE FOLLOWING DAYS: JULY 3, 2003, AND AUGUST 7, 2003 PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA ADJOURN CCPC AGENDA/SM/lo5/01/03 4 July 18, 2003 *Kenneth Abemathy called to continue Thursday's meeting at 8:30 AM on Friday, July 18, 2003. The pledge of allegiance was said. Role was taken and the meeting proceeded with 8K. K. 2003 Cycle GMP Amendment Petitions CPSP-2003-4 Amending the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) to add a new policy referencing the two Interlocal Agreements adopted in May 2003 by the Collier County School Board and the Board of County Commissioners; referencing the Future Land Use Map (FL UM) series depicting existing and future school sites and school support facilities in the FLUE support document; and, identifying zoning districts which allow and which do not allow school and school support facilities Amending the FLUM Series to add new maps depicting sites upon which schools and school support facilities are located, and depicting undeveloped sites for future schools and school support facilities Amending the Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) to refer to the two Interlocal Agreements adopted in May 2003 between the Collier County School Board and Board of County Commissioners Amending the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to reference the two Interlocal Agreements adopted in May 2003 between the Collier County referen ce the FL UE and ICE policies and FL UM series Amending the Immokalee Area Master Plan to reference the two Interlocal Agreements adopted in May 2003 between the Collier County School Board and Board of County Commissioners and to cross- reference the FL UE and ICE policies and FL UM Series. (Coordinator: David Weeks) *David Weeks - went over growth management plan amendments - this is a transmittal hearing - adoption hearings will take place in November or December - those people who sign-in today can receive an informational notice from the Florida Department of Community Affairs once the amendments have been adopted and found either in compliance or not - a full page legal ad was placed in the Naples Daily News relating to this topic - Mr. Weeks explained the amending issues - some additions: one site not included in map (#19), should have had site EE added opposite map, but was accidentally omitted; also need to add legend to differentiate between ancillary plans and school - in staff report one thing that the amendment was identified as accomplishing is Page 2 July 18, 2003 including in support document, for FLUE, a more specific description of the schools and support facilities - school board, viewed as the developer, and the county discussed these issues as acceptable agreements, but neither party likes them completely - today's purpose is to begin implementation of those agreements and incorporating or referencing them *Dwight Richardson wanted assurance that the general public will have the opportunity to react to these sites. He also wanted to know how the public will be involved. - Mr. Weeks stated that the interlocal agreements were advertised and a workshop was held between the school board and the county commission - the public's ability to interact is somewhat limited, except for high schools (there must be a compatibility-review process by staff), this is because high schools have larger parking lots and more sports activities *Amy Taylor - the state gives permission for new schools and they are usually built expediently - this is due to schools currently bursting at their seems - also, an over-site committee will be established for the public's input on determining where new sites will be located * David Weeks clarified that currently the public does not have that much input on where schools are built, however, the public can attend school board meetings. Yet the public is not notified personally of such meetings other than through public means, like the Naples Daily News. The meetings are also televised. - Mrs. Taylor stated that this new interlocal agreement involves the public before the property is purchased, along with the site-plan reviews, like landscaping * Mark Strain made the comment to add a stipulation to this that during compatibility reviews, impacted residents living within 1000 feet will be notified * David Weeks said that there are currently zoning regulations that allow the school board to put in a school without a public hearing process. Mr. Weeks also answered questions relating to sidewalks and who would pay for them. He stated that these are determined on a case-by-case basis and the school board usually only pays for a portion of the sidewalk. * There were no public speakers. *Kenneth Abernathy asked for a motion. Mark Strain made a motion for transmittal with the addition of local neighborhoods (not limited to 1000 feet) be notified of the Page 3 July 18, 2003 potential use prior to purchase during the consistency review. Lora Jean Young seconded the motion. It passed six to nothing. CPSP-2003-5: Petition requesting text amendments to the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Future Land Use Element and the Recreational Open Space Element in order to incorporate the Community Character/Smart Growth principles adopted by the Advisory Committee. (Coordinator: John David Moss) *John David Moss - went over goal #2 on p.3, goal #3 on p.5, and goal #2 on p.10 - some concerns by the staff: - opposed to the committee's recommendation to delete the Orange Blossom mixed-use district - the fiscal impact associated with preparing the implemented regulations - the general intent of these goals, objectives, and policies in the FLUE are unclear - the staff also requested, because of issues listed above, a transmittal of these amendments and in the meantime work with the community character smart growth advisory committee in order to iron out some of these problems * Start Litsinger - stated that the DCA will come in as a sort of arbiter * some concerns were made about policy 2.1.1 (from p. 10), whether or not it was mandatory or implied? - Mr. Litsinger said that staff was bringing forth for transmittal a "work in progress." * David Wolfley had concern regarding the meaning and vagueness of wording, for example in policy 2.1.3, "will assist," and "neighborhood" possibly changed to "sub-division" *Brad Schiffer said that this was changing an already suburban code into an urban code. He also stated that currently there are "buffers" and he would like to see it come forward after it finishes being a "work in progress" *Mark Strain stated his questions/concerns: - on p.3, policy 2.1.4, how will it be paid for? - the policies are a good idea, but don't allow them to become exclusive - objective 2.2, interconnect, prepare for in the policy? - policy 2.2.1, gates with a single point of access? - objective 2.3, land use diversity? Page 4 July 18, 2003 - policy 2.3.2, - policy 2.3.5, - obi ective 3.1 - policy 3.1.1, - policy 3.1.2, - policy 3.2.1, how's it going to work? what else are you going to come up with? , "great streets," what does that mean? "medians wide enough," what specific width? what's the point? that will require staff time - policy 3.2.3, what are the incentives? - p.7, "PUD neighborhood village center"? - p.8, similar paragraph, will this be cleaned up? - p. 9, GMP amendment, who established that? -p. 10, policy 2.1.3, are parks as essential service by right or by conditional use? - policy 2.2.1, "by 2010", this discrepancy needs to be cleaned up - policy 2.2.5, what are these incentives? - p. 13, findings and conclusions, stating that this is "not ready for transmittal and further analysis is required" - Mr. Litsinger clarified some of these issues. *Public Speakers: 1.) Dwight Nadeau (planning manager for RWA) - he supports the community character, thinks it's a great concept - change/modify wording and list incentives - encouragement should be done through land development codes, rather than mandates 2.) Brad Cornell (Collier County Audubon) - he does not believe that they have achieved what they wanted to achieve, such as the mixed-use policies - believes they should do this sooner than later - how do they implement the mixed-use issues, through incentives, encouragement, or mandates? (maybe a combination) 3.) Al Zichella (private citizen) - lean away from mandates in code, because mandates always ignore what the marketplace will demand - the in-community character plan should consider allowing the developer to make a market based plan instead of a mandated plan *Dwight Richardson stated that he has a vested interest and made a motion for transmittal. Lora Jean Young seconded the motion. Mr. Abernathy took the vote and it failed 1 to 5. Page 5 July 18, 2003 * A short recess was taken. During the recess Lora Jean Young left. *Paul White said that they needed to make a new motion. *Kenneth Abernathy asked for a new motion. Mark Strain made a new motion that they not transmit to the board of county commissioners at this time and allow staff to refine discrepancies, along with staff to get their questions answered. David Wolfley seconded the motion. The vote carded 5 to 0. CPSP-2003-6: Petition requesting the adoption of the County Manatee Protection Plan (MPP) and the amendment of the goals, objectives and policies of the County's Conservation and Coastal Management Element and Future Land Use Element to establish the Manatee Protection Plan (MPP). (Coordinator: Darren Murphy) *Darren Murphy (Collier County Comprehensive Planning) - this plan has been adopted by the DCA - it is a DRI exemption - this petition, if adopted into the GMP, will be exempted from the DRI process - the maps, on p.5, will be taken out (they were for reference purposes only) *Patrick White stated that the maps have a regulatory function and are not just for "reference." - Mr. Murphy said that the maps were from 1995 and are not very accurate. *Public Speaker: 1 .) Jacqueline Bart (Executive Director of the Marine Industries of Collier County) - the MPP is up for review and they are not sure if this needs to be added to the GMP before it's reviewed - if it does go into the GMP, then she wants assurance that the same language will be used as is currently in the plan *Darren Murphy told her that the language will not be changed. *Mark Strain made a motion to recommend transmittal with the exemption of the map. Brad Schiffer seconded the motion... *David Weeks stepped in and informed the commissioners that there is a revision that needs to be made. Darren Murphy concurred and pointed out that a language Page 6 July 18, 2003 revision, on p.3 objective 10.1, needed to be made with the removal of the word "may" and an "s" needed to be added to the word "restrict." Also, on p.4, under the Urban-Mixed Use Districts, language needed to be added that was not currently in the report. Mark Strain withdrew his motion. A decision was made to hold off on a motion until the end of the day when Mr. Murphy will come back with the necessary materials. CPSP-2003-7: Petition requesting the adoption of a new Economic Development Element including goals, objectives and policies to the Growth Management Plan. (Coordinator: John David Moss & Randy Cohen) *John David Moss (Comprehensive Planning) - as part of the Community Development Block Grant Funding for the Incubator Project in Immokalee, in which the county received $75,000 in grant monies - the grant application included a commitment by Collier County to prepare an optional economic element - if the county does not come into compliance, then there is a possibility that the county would have to repay that money - prepared a non-committal economic element that sets forth the goals, objectives, and policies stating that the county will support the commercial and industrial activities associated with economic development in Collier County - they are not committing the county to any action or expenditures of funds *Kenneth Abernathy had a problem with economic development being in the GMP. *Mark Strain was concerned about the wording of "will", such as policy 1.2.1. *Paul White tried to reassure him that it would not mean that it's mandatory. *David Weeks made a recommendation to delete references to the specific entity, for example policy 1.3.1, on p.3, delete EDC *Mark Strain wanted to see the wording of, "positive public image," in policy 1.1.5 to something more natural. *Stan Litsinger made note that in policy 1.4.1 the words "such as" may be more suitable to use. *Mark Strain made a motion for transmittal stipulating that comments made about language changes be incorporated. Dwight Richardson seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0. Page 7 July 18, 2003 CPSP-2003-8: Amendments to the Capital Improvement Element (CIE), Transportation Element, and Future Land Use Element to revise: Transportation Concurrency Management policies to establish a real time checkbook concurrency management system; To establish a Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA), and to adopt a Map of the proposed TCMA within the Urban Designated Area on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM); To establish two Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas (TCEA), and to adopt a map of the proposed TCEAs within the Urban Designated Area on the FLUM; and to add policies providing for fairshare developer contributions, to the Multimodal Transportation Work Program ora TCMA when directly impacting a deficient road segment. (Coordinator: Stan Litsinger) *Stan Litsinger - this petition is generated by staff in response to policy direction from the board of county commissioners and the county manager - it consists of"phase 2" in the concurrency management system - Mr. Litsinger went through each amendment change and accepted questions as he proceeded *Mark Strain questioned the hurricane evacuation routes. Don Scott attempted to answer his question, but did not answer it completely. The point made was that 1-75 is not currently wide enough to handle the amount of residents during a hurricane, but that's not halting development. *Brad Schiffer asked a question regarding software used by the engineers and if there's a coordination between private contractors software and that of the PUDs. The staff replied that there is currently no uniformity or consistency. *Don Scott stated that SYNCHRO is very costly. They are attempting to come up with standard traffic analysis statements. He also attempted to explain that the fair- share cost/calculation and the benefits involved. *Stan Litsinger explained that the developer could pay the county to increase the capacity of the system. The staff had been criticized in the past for not offering this option. *Brad Schiffer made note that the STP is prior to the building permit and also non- refundable, along with 50% of the transportation impact fees. *Dwight Richardson asked what happens to the road systems outside this map? Don Scott stated that this was only estimated up to 2011 and that there are ongoing studies for some sections of this map. Page 8 July 18, 2003 *Some discussions was made about this causing a false positive, where it could show that there would be a less need for build-up than it actually showed. Much of this is based on data collected and may be misrepresented. *Public Speakers: 1 .) David Ellis (Collier Building Association) - reliance on 3 year plan to 1 year proposed by staff causes concern - financial feasibility concems - argument that 3 year plan is actually "real" time, 7 years is too long - concerned about the excessive political process 2.) Al Zichella (on behalf of WCI communities) - objects to change from 3 years to 1 year of the 5 year plan - asking for "practical pragmatic" relief ~ needs certainty of process - 3 years is actual real time - he would like to see this plan amended to 3 years from proposed 1 year *Stan Litsinger stated that the political concept is that they want the road there before they approve the additional traffic on that road. 3.) Reed Jarvi (Transportation Special Engineer) - very important to have language in comprehensive plan that causes the road facilities to be built when they say they are to be built - keep 3 year window for concurrency purposes - change policy 5.8.1 from 85% to 75% in the TCMA - hurricane season does not coincide with peak season for evacuation and traffic purposes - policy 5.4 with SYNCHRO, may be sof~ware choice for today but not for tomorrow, would like to see flexibility in choosing computer programs *Mark Strain made mention to change "shall" to "encouraged" and change CIE 1.5.3.4 to state "planned" roadway facilities to avoid obligating. Mr. Strain also made a motion for transmittal of petition CPSP-2003-8 with single stipulation that policy 1.5.3 sections C & D will be utilized for 2 years instead of 1 ear. Lora Jean Young seconded the motion. The motion failed 3 to 3. *Brad Schiffer made a new motion stating the same as above, but changing it from 2 years to 3 years. Kenneth Abernathy seconded the motion. This motion passed 4 to 2. · CPSP-2003-9: Petition requesting change to Overlays and Special Features of the Land Use Designation Description Section of the Future Land Use Page 9 July 18, 2003 Element, to certain noise contours as previously changed by Land Development Code amendment on June 14, 2000. (Coordinator: Marcia Kendall) *Marcia Kendall - stated that the lines on map were brought up further to meet the criteria *Lora Jean Young made motion to forward petition CPSP-2003-9 to the board of county commissioners for the recommendation to transmit it to the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Dwight Richardson seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0. (continuation of CPSP-2003-6) *Darren Murphy stated that the additional information provided is for informational purposes and can be removed. *David Weeks said that this material was added by recommendation of the county attorney's office. It does no harm. *Public Speaker: 1 .) Jacqueline Barr (Marine Industries Association) - objective 10.1 made suggestion for correction - they are fine with the proposed adoption *Mark Strain made a motion to recommend for transmittal to board of county commissioners and DCA petition CPSP-2003-6 with the corrections provided. Brad Schiffer seconded the motion. The motion passed 6 to 0. *There was no old business, new business, or public comment item. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair, Kenneth Abernathy, at 1:17 PM. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN KENNETH ABERNATHY Page 10