Agenda 07/05/2017 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION
Municipal Services Taxing & Benefit Unit
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING WEDNESDAY, JULY 5, 2017
THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD WILL MEET AT 1 PM ON
JULY 5 AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY, LOCATED AT 8960
HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108.
AGENDA
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll call
3. Agenda approval
4. Approval of 06/07/17 Regular Session meeting minutes
5. Audience comments
6. Administrator's report (30 minutes)
a. Clam Pass excavation and re-grading
b. Cobblestones removal update
c. Irrigation project update
d. Phase 2 lake bank erosion study update
e. June financial report
7. Committee reports (60 minutes)
a. Clam Bay
b. Landscape & Safety
i. *LED conversion throughout Pelican Bay
ii. *Median cut-through project on Gulf Park Drive
iii. Discussion on taking over responsibility for PB sidewalks
c. Beach Renourishment
i. *Decision on 2017 beach renourishment
d. Budget
e. Water Management
8. Chairman's report (5 minutes)
9. Old business
10. New business
11. Adjournment
*indicates possible action items
ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER ITEM TO
ADDRESS THE BOARD. THE BOARD WILL SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SUBJECTS NOT ON THIS AGENDA AND
ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES. THE BOARD ENCOURAGES YOU TO
SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS IN WRITING IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING.ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A
DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO,AND THEREFORE
MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD IS MADE,WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE
UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS AN
ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING YOU ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROVISION OF
CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION AT (239) 597-1749 OR VISIT
PELICANBAYSERVICESDIVISION.NET.
06/29/2017 2:06:09 PM
PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD REGULAR SESSION
JUNE 7,2017
The Pelican Bay Services Division Board met on Wednesday, June 7, 2017, at 1:00 p.m. at the
Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive,Naples, Florida 34108.
In attendance were:
Pelican Bay Services Division Board Ken Dawson
Scott Streckenbein, Chairman Bohdan Hirniak
Mike Shepherd, Vice-Chairman Susan O'Brien
Joe Chicurel Peggy Pinterich
Tom Cravens Dave Trecker
Jacob Damouni Gary Ventress
Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Mary McCaughtry, Operations Analyst
Neil Dorrill, Administrator Lisa Jacob, Associate Project Manager
Marion Bolick, Operations Manager Barbara Shea; Recording Secretary
Also Present Dave Cook, Pelican Bay Foundation
John Chandler, Pelican Bay Foundation Tim Corcoran, Pelican Bay Foundation
APPROVED AGENDA (AS PRESENTED)
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Roll call
3. Employee recognition
4. Agenda approval
5. Approval of 05/03/17 Regular Session meeting minutes
6. Approval of 04/21/17 Budget Committee meeting minutes
7. Audience comments
8. Administrator's report (25 minutes)
a. Lake bank erosion study update
b. Update on the intersection of Gulf Park Dr. &US 41 and median cut
c. Bay Colony Brazilian pepper update
d. Cobblestones removal update
e. May financial report
9. Committee reports (25 minutes)
a. Clam Bay
b. Landscape& Safety
i. Street lighting project
c. Beach Renourishment
i. *Decision on 2017 beach renourishment
d. Budget
e. Water Management
10. Chairman's report (10 minutes)
1
Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session
June 7,2017
a. Meetings with Commissioner Solis
11. Old business (10 minutes)
a. Preliminary discussion on establishing priorities for PBSD projects
12. New business
13. Adjournment
*indicates possible action items
ROLL CALL
All members were present and a quorum was established
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION
The PBSD Board and Mr. Dorrill recognized PBSD employee Pedro Montero for his 24
years of dedicated service, as well as referenced positive comments on his hard work, received
from Pelican Bay residents Mr. and Mrs. Byczek. He will be nominated for a "Values in
Practice" award, a recognition program sponsored by Collier County.
AGENDA APPROVAL
Mr. Cravens motioned, Mr. Dawson seconded to approve the agenda as presented.
Dr. Trecker requested that item #9c be heard before the committee reports. The
motion carried unanimously.
APPROVAL OF 05/03/17 REGULAR SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Mr. Cravens motioned, Mr. Shepherd seconded to approve the 05/03/17 regular
session meeting minutes as amended. The motion carried unanimously.
APPROVAL OF 04/21/17 BUDGET COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
Mr. Cravens motioned, Dr. Trecker seconded to approve the 04/21/17 Budget
Committee meeting minutes as presented. The motion carried unanimously.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mr. Ray Kretz commented on the history of the removal of exotics near his property lines
by the PBSD over the past few years. He requested that the PBSD address noise abatement in
this area as this is a primary responsibility of the PBSD, as stated by ordinance.
Ms. Janet Rathbun commented on the noise abatement responsibility of the PBSD, and
suggested that additional landscaping be planted along the Oak Lake Sanctuary/The Village
border with US 41.
Ms. Lynn Eccleston commented on the US 41 noise issue and the PBF ownership of the
US 41 berm.
Mr. Vincent Vespo requested an update on his US 41 noise abatement request, as
discussed at the PBSD May board meeting.
2
Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session
June 7,2017
Mr. Dorrill commented that staff has requested a sketch and approximate cost to
construct a 200 foot berm from our AB&B engineer, which is expected to be completed in a few
weeks, and will be forwarded to the Landscape & Safety Committee for review and discussion of
possible cost-sharing with other entities.
Mr. Jim Issenmann commented on the possibility of Oak Lake Sanctuary residents cost-
sharing in the Gulf Park Dr. median cut project in order to expedite this project.
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
LAKE BANK EROSION STUDY UPDATE
Mr. Dorrill reported that our AB&B engineer is working on the final phase of the lake bank
erosion study.
UPDATE ON THE INTERSECTION OF GULF PARK DR. & US 41 & MEDIAN
CUT
Mr. Dorrill reported that the County Transportation Dept. had their quarterly safety meeting
for prioritization of capital projects, and staff has been informed that our proposed Gulf Park Dr.
median cut project is projected to receive County funding in 2025. Dr. Chicurel requested that Mr.
Issenmann poll Oak Lake Sanctuary residents to determine whether they would be receptive to cost-
sharing for the median cut project.
Mr. Dorrill reported on the related right-turn only Gulf Park Drive egress project which
would require funding from the PBSD or Collier County. Ms. O'Brien suggested that a majority of
PB residents may not favor changing the intersection to "right-turn only." Mr. Ventress suggested
that the execution of one of the projects (not both) would sufficiently solve the intersection's safety
issues. By consensus, the board referred both projects for further discussion to the Landscape &
Safety Committee.
BAY COLONY BRAZILIAN PEPPER UPDATE
Mr. Dorrill reported that two drainage-improvement projects in Bay Colony have been
completed. Remaining funds from these projects will be used to clean out the drainage swale behind
the County beach parking garage; staff will solicit a proposal from Earth Tech for this work.
COBBLESTONES REMOVAL UPDATE
Mr. Dorrill reported that our engineer has completed construction plans and submitted a
permit application for the cobblestone removal at the three remaining crosswalks on Pelican Bay
Blvd. The permit is expected to be issued within a few weeks, and work is expected to begin soon
thereafter.
MAY FINANCIAL REPORT
Mr. Cravens motioned, Dr. Trecker seconded to accept the May financial report.
The motion carried unanimously.
3
Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session
June 7,2017
COMMITTEE REPORTS
CLAM BAY REPORT
Ms. O'Brien summarized her May 2017 Clam Bay update included in the agenda packet and
specifically noted: (1) although April tidal gauge data was good, May data was not; this data will
continue to be closely monitored, (2) the bathymetric survey has been completed and a report is
expected soon, (3) water quality results look good for the first five months of 2017, with total
nitrogen, total phosphorus, and copper meeting state standards, and (4) the next FWC hearing on a
possible Clam Bay manatee protection zone designation is expected to be in July.
LANDSCAPE & SAFETY REPORT
Dr. Chicurel reported that the Landscape & Safety Committee met on May 16 and the
following items were discussed.
1. Upon receipt of the lighting consultant's report next month, the committee will vote
on the recommendation to change out all existing metal halide bulbs to LED bulbs.
2. Resident comments, e-mails, and discussion concerning the pathways (sidewalks) in
Pelican Bay highlighted a long ignored issue in Pelican Bay, namely its unsafe, dangerous,
poorly maintained, and inadequate pathways. These county owned pathways are used by
pedestrians, joggers, and cyclists. The inadequacy of the pathways has resulted in
pedestrian/bicycle accidents, injuries, near misses, and an overall unsafe feeling for all users.
The design, material nature, multiple usage, and volume of usage will be studied by the
committee and staff to find a remedy for this unsafe and poorly maintained infrastructure.
Mr. Dorrill reported on a discussion with Mr. Tim Durham, County Manager's Office,
concerning the possibility of the PBSD taking over maintenance of the PB pathways and the
expectation of a County contribution if this were to occur. Mr. Dorrill commented that this issue
will require significant strategizing and planning by the Landscape & Safety Committee.
Ms. O'Brien provided a summary of her observations (between May 29 and June 6) of
pathways in PB maintained by the County, which was added to the record.
3. The proposed Gulf Park Dr. cut-through at Oak Lake Sanctuary will be more clearly
addressed by the County so that the PBSD and community will know our options.
4. It was the consensus of the committee that our use of full-time vs. part-time
employees is a non issue and that efficient management will dictate the proper ratio utilized.
Ms. O'Brien commented on her recent observations of the 3 new street lights on the
Ridgeway/Laurel Oak corridor; one of the street lights, which was installed between two palm
trees, is providing less lighting than the other two. Mr. Dorrill will follow up on her concern.
Mr. Dorrill reported that he has had discussions with County Public Utilities personnel
and Mr. Tim Durham concerning future improvements to the PBSD maintenance site.
BEACH RENOURISHMENT REPORT
Dr. Trecker provided an update on possible near term and long term solutions to beach
erosion. Dr. Trecker provided background on the County's truck haul renourishment program in the
agenda packet and commented that the PBSD board must make a "near term" decision on
4
Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session
June 7,2017
participation in the County's 2017 renourishment program. The Coastal Zone Management Dept.
needs a decision from the PBSD by early July.
Dr. Trecker suggested that the PBSD board study long term solutions to beach erosion,
including (1) participating in a large resiliency project (forward renourishment), under consideration
by the County, which would extend widths up to 150 feet and source sand from offshore, (2) dune
plantings, (3) mangrove plantings, and(4) de-watering systems.
Dr. Trecker has scheduled a PBSD beach workshop for Oct. 16 from 1:00 — 3:00 p.m. at the
Community Center, which will include participation by Mr. Gary McAlpin and a representative from
Humiston& Moore.
Dr. Trecker suggested and the board agreed to postpone any vote on beach renourishment
until the July PBSD board meeting.
Dr. Trecker commented on the beach escarpment (approximate height of 4 feet) located just
north of the PBF buildings. He commented that the County has agreed to regrading this area,
subsequent to a formal request from Mr. Dorrill or the PBF. Mr. Cravens questioned whether the
regrading process would be affected by turtle nesting season. Mr. Dorrill commented that he will
coordinate the beach regrading with Mr. McAlpin, with consideration of turtle nesting season.
BUDGET REPORT
Mr. Shepherd commented that the FY18 PBSD budget will be reviewed by the BCC at the
June 15 budget workshop. The first public hearing for FY18 County budgets is scheduled for Sept.
7.
WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
Mr. Cravens reported that all PB lakes are currently algae-free, as a result of the start of the
rainy season. He commented that two aerators (St. Maarten's lake and a Golf Course lake) are not
functioning properly and staff is troubleshooting these issues.
Mr. Cravens provided photos of areas of missing sod on the west side of the berm. Sod has
been ordered to fill in these areas. Mr. Dorrill commented on"hydro-seeding" and the possibility of
looking at experimenting with this alternative method of grass installation.
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
THREE MEETINGS WITH COMMISSIONER SOLIS
Mr. Streckenbein commented on his May 24 meeting with Commissioner Solis, Ms.
Mary Johnson (PBF), and Mr. Jim Hoppensteadt (PBF) regarding the rejection of a Manatee
Protection Zone designation for Clam Bay and the July 18 appeal. Mr. Streckenbein reported
that Commissioner Solis provided suggestions and options for moving forward and is very
supportive of Pelican Bay.
Dr. Trecker characterized his meeting with Commissioner Solis and Mr. Dorrill as
friendly and productive. He concluded that Commissioner Solis is very supportive and a friend
to Pelican Bay.
Mr. Shepherd commented on his meeting with Commissioner Solis and Mr. Dorrill
regarding a general review of the PBSD assessments and budgetary needs over the past 12 years.
Mr. Shepherd concluded that Commissioner Solis is very supportive of Pelican Bay.
5
Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session
June 7,2017
OLD BUSINESS
PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION ON ESTABLISHING PRIORITIES FOR PBSD
PROJECTS
Ms. O'Brien provided a list of projects/topics committed to by the PBSD board. Mr.
Streckenbein commented that the items are in various stages of completion. He suggested that
board members review the list, provide any missing items to staff, and provide priorities to staff.
He suggested that staff add any missing items to the list, as well as provide information on each
item, such as (1) percentage of completion, (2) expected time of completion, and (3) whether the
item is fully budgeted,to the PBSD board at the July 5 meeting.
AVERAGE COST OF NONSUPERVISORY LANDSCAPING WORKERS
Ms. O'Brien provided a document entitled, "PBSD FY17 nonsupervisory landscaping
worker costs" which was added to the record. She commented that at the May PBSD board
meeting she reported that the average cost of a landscaping field worker was about $72,000/year.
At the last Landscape & Safety Committee meeting it was brought to her attention that the
salaries of the manager and two supervisors should not have been included in the calculation.
Consequently, Ms. O'Brien chose to correct the record with the new document she provided
which shows an average cost of a nonsupervisory landscaping worker for next year of
approximately $67,000/year.
NEW BUSINESS
None
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 2:30 p.m.
Scott Streckenbein, Chairman
Minutes approved [ ] as presented OR [ ] as amended ON [ ] date
6
Agenda Item#6a
Page 1 of 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve and authorize expenditure of Category "A" Tourist
Development Tax funds up to $57,600 for excavation of the Clam Pass inlet and re-grading
of the adjacent beaches, authorize necessary budget amendment in the amount of$30,000,
and make a finding that this expenditure promotes tourism.
OBJECTIVE: To quickly mobilize a site work contractor to excavate the inlet and re-grade the
affected areas of the beach to avoid further impacts to Clam Pass.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Clam Bay NRPA is a 560 acre estuarine system consisting of
beaches, shallow bays, tidal creeks, seagrass beds, mangrove forests, and Clam Pass. This
environmentally sensitive asset is managed by the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD). In
March, 2016, PBSD obtained a 10-year maintenance dredging permit from the Army Corps of
Engineers and the work being contemplated is applicable to the permit.
Over the past year, severe weather conditions that included Tropical Storm Colin (June 2016),
Hurricane Hermine (September 2016), and most recently Tropical Storm Cindy, have
contributed to reduced inlet stability. These storms have pushed a portion of the ebb shoal onto
the beach creating a spit that pushes the inlet to the north. In addition, wave action has eroded a
portion of the upland beach causing a steep escarpment that will require re-grading to a more
natural slope. To avoid further impacts to the Pass, engineering firm Humiston & Moore have
recommended excavation of the recently formed spit, which will restore the inlet channel to its
original permitted location, refill the channel that has meandered, and re-grade the inlet banks to
the original permitted design template.
Staff is working with the engineering firm Humiston & Moore to prepare engineering design
plans and obtain the required approvals from Florida Department of Environmental Protection
and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and with Procurement Services to obtain competitive quotes
to quickly mobilize a contractor.
TDC RECOMMENDATION: At its meeting on June 26, 2017, the TDC voted unanimously to
endorse staff's recommendation to recommend to the Board that TDC funds in the amount of
$30,000 be authorized for excavation of the inlet and re-grading of the public portion of the
beach, and make a finding that this expenditure promotes tourism. The TDC was advised that
the Pelican Bay Foundation will reimburse the County the proportionate share of any sand that it
receives for its beaches. The amount is not known today.
FISCAL IMPACT: Total estimated cost for the Clam Pass inlet excavation and re-grading
' project is $57,600. Engineering, permitting, surveying, and monitoring fees are estimated to be
$27,600 and the engineer's estimate of probable cost for construction is $30,000. Funding in the
amount of$27,600 is presently available in Clam Pass Dredging project 88032 in TDC Beach
Renourishment and Inlet Maintenance Fund (195). The balance of required funding, $30,000,
will be provided from TDC Fund (195) reserves. A budget amendment moving funding from
reserves into project 88032 will be required.
Agenda Item#6a
Page 2 of 2
The Pelican Bay Foundation will reimburse Collier County for the proportionate share of any
sand that it receives on its beach.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: Ordinance No. 92-60, as amended, provides that pass and inlet
maintenance is an authorized expenditure for tourist development taxes with a finding that the
expenditure promotes tourism. This item has been approved as to form and legality and requires
majority vote for approval.—CMG
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approves and authorizes
expenditure of Tourist Development Category "A" funds up to $57,600 for excavation of the
Clam Pass inlet and re-grading of the public portion of beach, authorizes necessary budget
amendment, and makes a finding that the expenditure promotes tourism.
Prepared by: Lisa Jacob,Project Manager, Pelican Bay Services Division
,./ .. 3g
/ .".- . .'',if
ill
! •
xz
st I r 4
_� i
H
` .
o
�r
..
ajj r
' r .
5 �i
' f"
tigt 5 Y.4'
i 4 ,j 4
t It
t' - \ :'-
, !... :,
•
r,,,t,i, I' . , ."4. t. t
:. { y •
to `i > y$
*.x
is at. ,,
r
(?4
4 :.:
4i n ;;i .,� ; to X.
y : i ' i
,' .. / �'
4
�
ti
t
i "
'�5 t ��
.. '. �1
,.i! ., _ ,. ..
..„„ .. ..
Sip '4.1
V� '` e.,.
4. N
..,
'* a R N
ts...
al
(NI. =.,.
C•1
C\1,..
C,)
C
=
N,
. ,..,
f ifil0=;*
0
h
C NI
...
I
.:
,Akzu
:3
s-, I
. 1i: : 4#
, .
, r .
.' .. ..
--_..., ..:
. ,
. ,.,.
its.
. ...._,.. ,
, ,....... .
. .
'',',• ,
'.• ,
..,
.. ,
•
:,.
1 ,
gi
l .
:
i .
A
, .
., ,....
,,>•-,
i
-.
"•e
N..,.. .•e
>%
, .
.,
No=(g)
•
. .
. t .
`.1
Cl)
. A '
i-
. -
.4..•
(I) i
, !..4... 4
. ,
.1'
3
l
; ....A.x
.4i.,:,:wv.:,
ttt,:o:t,,,sl
,00.41.51 :4e. ,,
EO '
L. t�
jilick
d (0 syg hH;AIM
n r m tv
c : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
_rte --
• ••••'''',.-:,.;„\
.:•';-."--0:
c y?• r b(• .. r 2 ;,
•
i,..,„:.: r s. < r '' d L c • t i"e:. '', _
gs d ,yS
a
At-
.
x + •!••1" + . r + 'i' � C # t. xgyS+l , ty •"r 04, Mf .
•
ge
•
rittokT.,,,i RI
4
•
ith
•
•
•
•
411r/co
•
•
. .
•
o01,
•
47ii
. .
- •
.. •..... —
•
• . A 0
N „, ........
N ,_;,___....y
` • -------- ,:_ r
/— g ;
•
:
C
C
V
m I I.
(w) 14
C
-o
G1
L _
Q 6N
m o
4....0t- co (w)2,40 PJ6!+FI gnaM
,^ u, v m ni
v+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
•0 m
•
LV ai �_
KCQ
0
l _ COC).
�tf ' 4Yi i, §C -tra " -
1 #3 L, �fy �a :4-,-,72,..,.....--,,,,:, , -..,,,,„,,,,,.,•„:„ . . Ca
¢ "fir. �r' l.l .s .,r i „4,..;,.. ,-„,..,;,,,-a r {„ r Yl'-'41,,, t9 a� i:.w,,..
T ' • •t" ` ,t, 4 7 ' `fir a -4, .as P * i 1.4',-
.-:-.,«
a+
•
o
°' m
.it
•
•
Ili
N \ '
ni
NCO
•
Z N
11111
1 g
.... .
.__________,...----Ve n
,_ _ Q
V
= z
•
•
ca
5 ••
I` •
N ••
0 ..— o
N ce
(w)sH
,cl
I
laatladea:— I
a
m o
1.1 "
11.§R3 0
4
6 4 M
L-C)
W
T3
CT)
1116,11.
,10:011111C„
"
fie
","'"
'
04•I'
; ;‘,:r',",14:::;•7
11.11
CtYi;471T,e'S:14^1:4'*.'
*W:arr
4 -
CL)
a)
Cl)
0
C2.
0
.
aq,� .r _ C
4n
'T h- O
c u
E CI
—' a� h .. a a - a i i
s-v
0 jas
a uz
0')
/
Q —_
(•y
i
\--------- .
\ ------,,,,s....„.\\,
•
/F
a.. 4,, /
...,.
1
Ir
k
'V
....>3
....
.‘ / i
,r _
111111 —
401.
4) b , . �. .
00
O
, co
� c
-o >
co co
.a CO
w CD
4)
p (...9 S–
(r) a�
CO
0
2 a 0
a m
t
� I i
xtt-
,,i) ,giX w,x«t3ba%3sS>t.#a ^ Q�.. � , t '
}
C
g
Cll
? ,
5 / 'ii.,.''..., tis °
•,spi, t �y y tQ -ft.'
a
y�W /
• 1 i g +&d we-dam ,,•% '-
I' 4 i }t „ , . J ,
4 •a
tit ° , F �J
! ist ;, ,I'' ' 4f.-1-.t::1:4 - - 't I '•W!''''.".4!!''''ii''*
7 .". .i#, , I' ..,,,,,!,,. ' k , L'''
s 1` ( cy
fit
� s; Q�
1 '.. 1 1�kl 1S
�d +h3 ;
a'
, ,tw4.,,, , ., ,. i ': C '! '. 'a .i . i
*t•„,,, ) t
l,3" ) 1
rfq7.g+ f, ;Sr '�-- 4
f ,,-,. 't'
is )
flestaligfilivilifiti ' 1 !
4 ..",1,,, ; ';'' ' • - i 4' e _,, , ,. ..._
..., . , ,,, , ,,...,,t,„,. 1....
4,, ,,.,, .. ,. N.., ''. ! ! ' .At„.?!!. . ": ..', , k$
.t, :., , . ...,:.• . , i.:_„i......w.. .. ,. .;.
' W ......,
` .: o
5
/ ., • , ..
....„ ., ...i ‘;'.1.a
r. y t 1• 1 , ,, G M
4 , ,:.',1k:<,
��< "
CO
� g + ^d'`c`j +c� ..
y i t'a
14.14
.4. , 4 ., 4. f,Ik!,,,itt,,,: ' ! '.st•,,i,'...' 1,4 s,,,,,.....4,4„,„, .,t 1\.4 I,
C
Ca
- . „ ...,- ,,,g- 4ott, .
"�.�'i t Y '+1 ' jt j. ms:
{ R6o -,,,,i,„. t ' qq.
gg.
t.
0
ct.,. ° a .""R� -C\ rd:.err
� ; 7 c @� 1
F\CalliarA.O1-C,, -Pass,:017-D ndun1DV'GV2G77-CF 311-?Isry a tLX Zd c Prn,Jun -i X1.117
.> .. ...
[C3
9Pi
A.
b . n
# x .' � �.w`
*a g 4fi n p ? a "4t• wa ",�. °.' ,:
It'
t
-7 .._1 fry
79 m
Z ,,,,„0. —I .., -07. 0 30 'i, 1
71
r a+ g D 23 . UW !StJ, --»0 G7 �wB r, S.
m
Z m fr w �>
0
r D > .....4Tf -a
D O Z7 t c 1 I D
I-9 CO > '-, '-r �;' fTt _
r
* it1
lk, "4,:-,,'
I.
Inkfalleffilig
Imre ibt, ,\\ ..,.tur.,,,,,, ,, 4,::„,,
•
;Z7 Cri
ri 7
C7
•
i_ ', I vz
o
C.
cn g D -o ;n —I Z � "— :,,,,
p D ori —I rrl O3 i 14_ ,4,. '
WN Z ; �''1 ; ; n .,0;-1
-.
of
ZVl'0D f'1 0 r k4 rrir
O m XI PIcn77Z b. D
MI 0 XI
!7 —I
4;4!!Ilii!I
' EC
! *I
_���0-1 HTN 91
Mal -7
-2 ec--. (0D
—1 FTI
0 O
W NZVZi
C �
y - ar:n
r
44..m ON C TZ � , ,i.irp Mix 7J D D 2 O —I
< Om =mz4DDmD
r O N p Q C) y
r 0 r-
z
Cnt� vD
C m
g
ri CD -0 'gym Z €
ON n yr O=f Z = r-e ,-w,, q„,
rn co ( D c 0 -r
fn Z I—ITIM _0 O m
O) m -O .Z�7 f44 -44"'" tea. t �.
v m � �y co
Z -9 (g „j am � a
> m to ZN % D
•• m M
ril
Z D m A Z D nn }'.
> ZV) rZ yrn
moi""- .� 0
I
,,, t:
p �Z Z --^� 7c
pp < C7 D > �'r 71 V= ^-I ti`
L
I
IZ co O Tt
TIO O < kk: r"
Dpa
f+7
= A nJ +.
0
-<
zi
cn
m
14-0
O 71 rn
�' '4
m t4
r
-74i
Pi
iii
W aO G o.
opIle 4.s
3�oNOC
coo o
4-.. 1 t r ,15
r:.G=�93a �?if ":kvr p .?�;F I)..e. G: t'�0^:7-0,:;-:13,1-01.71,01.9�r=Yii?_d< Pdn;-,lur f :l017
v
cn p !r.1 N .7..
Z A
O cn m
—18
DDO mG� OmOc�nmm
0701;2 -<72. Dr" *� OODN W P N -< x2 < C —IcnXA -oOZ 3r �- —
SGS � m � n ooD p � m
�DrnvD-` �Z� ❑ co D z 3
om- � cop-r G)
ocnwv� _cool-<� OO+i+- v
D D I l �n p Z W > o C C -1
0 O C N m m O v A W W W W W W W W W W W W co
W co w W W CO W W W w W W W W co W m m
D V7 < co co co N W N co N W W W au co W W W N N co W W 0o W W ao W W W D
Uf �_ c0 V1 '� _Co" ao ao ,, co w w w w w co a w co co w-c° w ao w 0., 0o w CO co T E (�
c� �DCaOco m� =�� (0 � c�n � (00) `wc°o No~o a � wAowoc, wAo Co' Nrn m —I O
i Z Cl) A co c N W cd -, O C A N 0) !DN.) <0- 0 Q 0 O O O V CO W co co A Z
O Z C O Z Z O O D I a """` CO C0 N (T (Il A W W W A C0 N V 0) O (T A (0 d) (T O Q) W W O A CO +n ,ZJ
O
3
r -
�� zmr < DmZ� ❑� z
�o � mra � - n�v 00+F-
�+ OornZ ��0 - CO~ rnrnrnrn rnrnrn rnrnrnrnrnrn rnrn
0) 0, rnrn rnrnrnrnrn rnrn rnrn Z T
(I) V7 O Z Dp rn N Cl) � rn 0) rn 0) co 0) rn co co co 0) co
0) co rn rn 0) rn rn 0) Co 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)m = O
(
.-- W W W W --1" A(n Q) V V co V V V cd cd cd o._, v C) cT (7) A A A A A m "� A
D m (O— m� r 01 a) N V Cp V Co W W U) A W 0) 0) W N 0) N N W 0 0 2
'-{0 rel Z rri W.. 2 O W W A W -, W N , W U) C) (-,4, -• 0) Q) 07 CO W CO N W W O Z _.
-ri
in
'Z Chi "0 OD-d.- A N co W N O C) N O Ut A W V (T cd Ut Cr) A Cn cd a) Q) W O W W O O _
c.+ � vr*i -moi = 0
W � I m e
El
VI D it-.,,,r /`�
Z I r*i Pi Z } 'r
o
-+ 3 °a o _
�r='IWDm Z O Z
+ � � N3 Z z 1
�_ _
O -DOD I*1 i 0
_-i Z
O CD rim -c � �
oncooO z ,
_HC i-,,--=.. p
Z rn, i coD
D C7 p
2 D r _
1>1
cn Z
'1
00 0
D ca ���
00+0 tO
n c
-� t—
(.4
0 M ,,T,.,.,; \ r I r
r� I, � � � -
*44
I CI
D *eh nz "F, I ..�
Crri
' co C Rt .r ...-
i 1 0 xi
r--- A D y .,
<
,,,, Alifiw
(j
,
_ 05+z ‘11,
-----E1 ----
� -
1
I> —
‘ n, ,/,`" ,,,...,, '.
/
/ ill.tri' ,<:,,t, ,4.a , ' , , ''' 133
; , C) 4 . � D '
u , j 6 rc .r q w
IV 20 0
(0 „
r_ a ,...
o D O
..q.
,,
___
0r, > z
e
rn
IN) o � -� / ' 1 11
f/ln
rnmD �D � � %� Fa ,
cn�z ''� ` v i 11_ �
V mD rA f7 f�
o zN ��
Dry I\ A ��
CI
cZ � cZ j / \
0 oD� ar:5‘<t/;
�' I 0
0 < oz N -oc� N c) c) m- o Z 1
N zm c D O m x� m v
vrcno v � � z D > > C')�_ v) \ _
= c7Z _0 < T. Q <O O ,
mrD- D� � n � D Z Z DZ Z
-i r*7 y�-c Z- 0 N N � 0 D X , .. \ ��
2 N m r C Z-O C7 a :c ' _,,,(\„.
o r� r -i D D , *� A\
/
CN
r-
O
Z t
F v-r z cn 0
fi \ ... ,,
2X�� 1114 i d - a ,
.w r
z g„ - , - 4, ".4v,.,?:4.1,7, l'.,,' ' ,.,:',411‘,N, 1
...„,,,.,, ,„. „„, ,,, ,„. . ,,,- - ,,, ,,,. -4- \
3 0
.... , \ \ \ , \co,-1
1 _0 ..., . ...,,.0R sts,
-----�,__._.,..___.___-.--N ,
-.._._.. r `a
... ,.
"86,61te " )100, \ , x
,,,
, \
d 9
, ,
.
o k
Agenda Item#6e
Page 1 of 15
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Balance Sheet-June 30,2017
Operating Fund 109-FY 2017
(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and Investments $ 2,214,673.26
Interest Receivable -
Improvements,Vehicles& Equipment 764,064.85
Due from Property Appraiser -
Due from Tax Collector -
Total Current Assets $ 2,978,738.11
Total Assets $ 2,978,738,11
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Current Liabilities
Accounts/Trade Payable $ 46,553.84
Accrued Wages Payable -
Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 12,079.13
Total Liabilities $ 58,632.97
Fund Balance
Fund Balance- unreserved $ 907,381.04
Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 2,012,724,10
Total Fund Balance $ 2,920,105.14
Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 2,978,738.11
Agenda Item#6e
Page 2 of 15
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Income Statement w/Budget-lune 30,2017
Operating Fund 109-FY 2017
(Unaudited)
Annual YTD YTD
Budget Budget Actual Variance
Operating Revenues:
Carryforward $ 608,800.00 $ 608,800.00 $ 608,800.00 $ -
Special Assessment-Water Management Admin 1,009,100.00 968,700.00 972,368.09 3,668.09
Special Assessment-Right of Way Beautification 2,941,100.00 2,823,500.00 2,833,758.42 10,258.42
Plan Review Fees 1,500.00 - - -
Miscellaneous(Surplus Sales,Ins.Refunds,tax coil) - - 7,701.12 7,701.12
Revenue Reserve(est.5%) (197,900.00) - - -
Interest 6,300.00 4,725.00 12,064.84 7,339.84
Total Operating Revenues $ 4,368,900.00 $ 4,405,725.00 $ 4,434,692.47 $ 28,967.47
Operating Expenditures:
Water Management Administration
Payroll Expense $ 75,000.00 $ 50,700.00 $ 46,631.29 $ 4,068.71
Emergency Maintenace and Repairs 3,500.00 700.00 554.58 145.42
IT Direct Capital 1,100.00 825.00 825.00 -
IT Office Automation/Billing Hr. 5,300.00 5,300.00 5,419.51 (119.51)
Indirect Cost Reimbursement 104,900.00 104,900.00 104,900.00 -
Inter Payment/Mnt.Site Ins. Assessment 13,600.00 10,200.00 10,200.00 -
Other Contractural Services 51,500.00 34,300.00 31,015.50 3,284.50
Telephone 5,200.00 3,500.00 2,268.88 1,231.12
Postage and Freight 1,200.00 - - -
Rent Buildings and Equipment 13,700.00 11,400.00 10,981.45 418.55
Insurance-General 2,200.00 1,700.00 1,650.00 50.00
Printing,Binding and Copying 1,800.00 100.00 85.12 14.88
Clerk's Recording Fees 1,000.00 - - -
Legal Advertising 1,000.00 - - -
Other Office and Operating Supplies 1,500.00 1,100.00 1,186.74 (86.74)
Training and Education(Tuition Reimb.) 1,500.00 1,300.00 1,683.95 (383.95)
Total Water Management Aclmin Operating $ 284,000.00 $ 226,025.00 $ 217,402.02 $ 8,622.98
Water Management Field Operations
Payroll Expense $ 145,500.00 $ 106,800.00 $ 103,693.07 $ 3,106.93
Engineering Fees 60,000.00 40,300.00 39,246.40 1,053.60
IT Office Automation 700.00 700.00 888.38 (188.38)
Flood Control Berm and Swale Mntc. 66,000.00 9,000.00 3,740.00 5,260.00
Flood Control Replanting Littorals 8,500.00 - -
Flood Control Water Quality Testing Supplies 1,500.00 - (34.24) 34.24
Interdepartmental Payment(Water Quality Lab) 17,700.00 17,700.00 17,800.05 (100.05)
Plan Review Charges 1,500.00 - -
Other Contractural Services 8,300.00 7,100.00 6,900.79 199.21
Temporary Labor 77,800.00 58,400.00 58,466.35 (66.35)
Cell Phones 1,300.00 1,000.00 1,053.41 (53.41)
Trash and Garbage 5,900.00 4,000.00 3,702.00 298.00
Motor Pool Rental Charge 100.00 - - -
Insurance-General 2,500.00 1,875.00 1,875.00 -
Insurance-Auto 1,000.00 750.00 750.00
Building Repairs&Mntc. 500.00 175.00 132.13 42.87
Fleet Maintenance and Parts 10,300.00 6,900.00 6,932.85 (32.85)
Fuel and Lubricants 2,300.00 1,500.00 1,028.64 471.36
Tree Triming 121,800.00 86,300.00 86,050.00 250.00
Page 1 of 3
Agenda Item#6e
Page 3 of 15
Clothing and Uniforms 1,600.00 1,400.00 1,357.61 42.39
Personal Safety Equipment 800.00 300.00 - 300.00
Fertilizer and Herbicides 100,500.00 49,400.00 31,677.60 17,722.40
Other Repairs and Maintenance 1,500.00 800.00 409.04 390.96
Other Operating Supplies and Equipment 2,500.00 1,900.00 2,010.95 (110.95)
Total Water Management Field Operating $ 640,100.00 $ 396,300.00 $ 367,680.03 $ 28,619.97
Right of Way Beautification-Administration
Payroll Expense $ 76,500.00 $ 60,500.00 $ 56,531.40 $ 3,968.60
Emergency Repairs and Maintenance 4,500.00 200.00 25.00 175.00
IT Capital -
- -
Office Automation 500.00 500.00 536.50 (36.50)
Other Contractural Services 52,400.00 34,900.00 30,360.66 4,539.34
Telephone 5,200.00 3,500.00 2,129.00 1,371.00
Postage 2,000.00 200.00 15.08 184.92
Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 15,000.00 12,500.00 11,811.15 688.85
Insurance-General 500.00 375.00 375.00 -
Printing,Binding and Copying 2,300.00 100.00 57.36 42.64
Clerk's Recording 1,200.00 - -
Legal Advertising 1,200.00 - - -
Office Supplies General 2,000.00 1,700.00 3,069.77 (1,369.77)
Training and Education(Tuition Reimb.) 8,500.00 5,000.00 2,393.00 2,607.00
Total Right of Way Beautification Admin Operating $ 171,800.00 $ 119,475.00 $ 107,303.92 $ 12,171.08
Right of Way Beautification-Field Operations
Payroll Expense $ 1,032,600.00 $ 740,400.00 $ 727,654.24 $ 12,745.76
IT Capital&Office Automation&Hr.Billing 16,200.00 16,200.00 21,044.89 $ (4,844.89)
Emergency Maintenance and Repairs 3,300.00 - - -
Recycled Water Use 110,000.00 85,000.00 84,719.76 280.24
Pest Control 1,000.00 500,00 400.00 100.00
Landscape Incidentals 2,500.00 1,300.00 1,262.58 37.42
Other Contractural Services 31,100.00 21,500.00 13,648.88 7,851.12
Temporary Labor 562,300.00 326,500.00 311,655.13 14,844.87
Cellular Telephone 5,800.00 3,400.00 1,948.71 1,451.29
Electricity 4,000.00 3,300.00 3,976.38 (676.38)
Trash and Garbage 17,700.00 13,700.00 12,545.72 1,154.28
Cable TV/Internet 1,200.00 - - -
Rent Equipment 5,000.00 3,300.00 3,003.68 296.32
Insurance-General 8,800.00 6,600.00 6,600.00 -
Insurance-Auto 10,100.00 7,600.00 7,575.00 25.00
Insurance Claims Paid430.44 (430.44)
Building Repairs and Maintenance 500.00 300.00 170.19 129.81
Fleet Maintenance and Parts 42,600.00 32,000.00 28,221.34 3,778.66
Fuel and Lubricants 33,300.00 25,000.00 19,862.56 5,137.44
Licenses,Permits,Training 1,700.00 1,300.00 1,027.50 272.50
Tree Triming 181,000.00 162,900.00 161,375.00 1,525.00
Clothing and Uniforms 12,000.00 7,000.00 6,339.28 660.72
Personal Safety Equipment 5,000.00 2,900.00 2,167.83 732.17
Fertilizer and Herbicides 80,000.00 80,000.00 94,256.71 (14,256.71)
Landscape Maintenance/Mulch 75,000.00 47,000.00 33,948.95 13,051.05
Landscape Materials 73,200.00 70,500.00 72,075.80 (1,575.80)
Road/Pathway Repairs(Sharrows) 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,453.42 (453.42)
Sprinkler Maintenance 25,000.00 16,800.00 16,294.71 505.29
Painting Supplies 500.00 - - -
Traffic Signs 10,000.00 5,800.00 3,721.85 2,078.15
Minor Operating Equipment 12,000.00 7,000.00 6,791.66 208.34
Other Operating Supplies 11,000.00 8,300.00 7,879.52 420.48
Page 2 of 3
Agenda Item#6e
Page 4 of 15
Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Operating $ 2,376,400.00 $ 1,698,100.00 $ 1,653,051.73 $ 45,048.27
Total Operating Expenditures $ 3,472,300.00 $ 2,439,900.00 $ 2,345,437.70 $ 94,462.30
Capital Expenditures:
Water Management Operations
Other Machinery and Equipment-Field $ 17,000.00 $ 15,640.00 $ 15,425.04 $ 214.96
General-Admin 1,000.00 - -
Total Water Management Field Operations Capital $ 18,000.00 $ 15,640,00 $ 15,425.04 $ 214.96
Right of Way Beautification
Autos and Trucks $ - - $ - $
Other Machinery and Equipment 89,000.00 84,550.00 84,267.78 $ 282.22
General-Admin 1,000.00 - - $ -
Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Capital $ 90,000.00 $ 84,550.00 $ 84,267.78 $ 282.22
Total Capital Expenditures $ 108,000.00 $ 100,190.00 $ 99,692.82 $ 497.18
Total Operating Expenditures $ 3,580,300.00 $ 2,540,090.00 $ 2,445,130.52 $ 94,959.48
Non-Operating Expenditures:
Transfer to Fund 322 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Tax Collector Fees 98,800.00 83,980.00 76,122.53 7,857.47
Property Appraiser Fees 60,000.00 57,000.00 54,083.93 2,916.07
Reserves(2 1/2 months for Contingencies) 432,700.00 - - -
Reserves for Capital 217,900.00 - - -
Reserved for Attrition (20,800.00) - - -
Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 788,600.00 $ 140,980.00 $ 130,206.46 $ 10,773.54
Total Expenditures $ 4,368,900.00 $ 2,681,070.00 $ 2,575,336.98 $ 105,733.02
Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 1,724,655.00 $ 1,859,355.49 $ 134,700.49
Page 3 of 3
Agenda Item#6e
Page 5 of 15
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Balance Sheet-June 30,2017
Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2017
(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and Investments $ 1,370,769.36
Interest Receivable
Improvements,Vehicles& Equipment 15,725.76
Due from Tax Collector -
Total Current Assets $ 1,386,495.12
Total Assets $ 1,386,495.12
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Current Liabilities
Accounts/Trade Payable $ 2,165.53
Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 565.85
Accrued Wages Payable -
Total Liabilities $ 2,731.38
Fund Balance
Fund Balance-unreserved $ 1,146,299.39
Excess Revenue (Expenditures) 237,464.35
Total Fund Balance $ 1,383,763.74
Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 1,386,495.12
Agenda Item#6e
Page 6 of 15
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Income Statement w/Budget-June 30,2017
Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2017
(Unaudited)
Annual YTD YTD
Budget Budget Actual Variance
Operating Revenues:
Carryforward $ 1,119,300.00 $ 1,119,300.00 $ 1,119,300.00 $ -
Curent Ad Valorem Tax 535,300.00 513,900.00 515,753.87 1,853.87
Transfer from Tax Collector - - 31.21 31.21
Miscellaneous(i.e. Ins. Refunds,surplus, eti - - - -
Revenue Reserve (est. 5%) (26,900,00) - - -
Interest 2,500.00 1,875.00 7,835.06 5,960.06
Total Operating Revenues $ 1,630,200.00 $ 1,635,075.00 $ 1,642,920.14 $ 7,845.14
Operating Expenditures:
Street Lighting Administration
Payroll Expense $ 75,700.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 55,076.73 $ 4,923.27
Indirect Cost&IT Automation 8,300.00 8,200.00 8,175.00 25.00
Other Contractural Services 33,700.00 25,300.00 24,683.50 616.50
Telephone 5,200.00 3,500.00 1,556.66 1,943.34
Postage and Freight 1,500.00 300.00 132.00 168.00
Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 14,500.00 12,100.00 11,444.63 655.37
Insurance-General 400.00 300.00 300.00 -
Printing, Binding and Copying - - - -
Office Supplies General 800.00 500.00 328.38 171.62
Tuition Reimbursement - - - -
Other Operating Supplies 1,000.00 - - -
Total Street Lighting Admin Operating $ 141,100.00 $ 110,200.00 $ 101,696.90 $ 8,503.10
Street Lighting Field Operations
Payroll Expense $ 69,400.00 $ 50,100.00 $ 48,937.01 $ 1,162.99
Enginnering Fees 10,000.00 9,000.00 8,872.00 128.00
IT Office Automation 300.00 300.00 225.00 75.00
Emergency Maintenance& Repairs 9,600.00 7,200.00 7,265.32 (65.32)
Other Contractual Services 800.00 500.00 458.10 41.90
Temporary Labor 42,400.00 31,800.00 24,584.81 7,215.19
Cellular Telephone 1,100.00 800.00 1,003.43 (203.43)
Electricity 30,000.00 22,500.00 21,311.94 1,188.06
Insurance-General 1,000.00 750.00 750.00 -
Insurance-Auto 1,000.00 750.00 750.00 -
Building Maintenace&Repairs 500.00 125.00 71.00 54.00
Page 1 of 2
Agenda Item#6e
Page 7 of 15
Fleet Maintenance and Parts 5,400.00 3,600.00 2,347.80 1,252.20
Fuel and Lubricants 700.00 500.00 375.30 124.70
Other Equipment Repairs/Supplies 500.00 200.00 59.12 140.88
Personal Safety Equipment 800.00 600.00 660.55 (60.55)
Electrical Contractors* 77,000.00 32,083.33 24,292.73 7,790.60
Light Bulb Ballast 16,800.00 11,100.00 7,793.37 3,306.63
Total Street Lighting Field Operating $ 267,300.00 $ 171,908.33 $ 149,757.48 $ 22,150.85
Total Street Lighting Expenditures $ 408,400.00 $ 282,108.33 $ 251,454.38 $ 30,653.95
Capital Expenditures:
Street Lighting Operations
Other Machinery/Equipment** $ 39,400.00 $ 39,400.00 $ 38,266.79 $ 1,133.21
General Improvements-Admin 1,000.00 - - -
Total Capital Expenditures $ 40,400.00 $ 39,400.00 $ 38,266.79 $ 1,133.21
Total Operating Expenditures $ 448,800.00 $ 321,508.33 $ 289,721.17 $ 31,787.16
Non-Operating Expenditures:
Tax Collector Fees $ 14,000.00 $ 11,200.00 $ 10,359.08 $ 840.92
Property Appraiser Fees 7,500.00 $ 3,800.00 - 3,800.00
Reserve for Future Construction* 900,000.00 - - -
Reserves(2 1/2 mos.for Contingencies) 124,700.00 - - -
Reserves for Capital 135,200.00 - - -
Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 1,181,400.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 10,359.08 $ 4,640.92
Total Expenditures $ 1,630,200.00 $ 336,508.33 $ 300,080.25 $ 36,428.08
Net Prof it/(Loss) $ - $ 1,298,566.67 $ 1,342,839.89 $ 44,273.22
*BA Transferred$100K to Operating
**Transferred$39,400 from Elec Contr
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item#6e
Page 8 of 15
•
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Balance Sheet-June 30, 2017
Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2017
(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and Investments $ 1462,958.81
interest Receivable -
Improvements,Vehicles& Equipment 2,537,868.66
Due from Tax Collector -
Total Current Assets $ 3,700,827.47
Total Assets $ 3,700,827.47
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Current Liabilities
Accounts/Trade Payable $ 2,006.55
Goods Received Inv. Received 4,296.50
Total Liabilities $ 6,303.05
Fund Balance
Fund Balance-unreserved $ 1,291,916.45
Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 2,402,607.97
Total Fund Balance $ 3,694,524.42
Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 3,700,827.47
Agenda Item#6e
Page 9 of 15
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Income Statement w/Budget-June 30,2017
Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2017
(Unaudited)
Adopted Amended YTD YTD
Budget Budget Budget Actual Variance
Operating Revenues:
Carry Forward $1,280,442.46 $ 1,280,442.46 $ 1,280,442.46 $ 1,280,442.46 $ -
Transfer from Fund 109 General - - - - -
Miscellaneous - - - - -
Special Assessment 428,100.00 428,100.00 411,000.00 412,388.24 1,388.24
Transfer from Tax Collector - - 25.04 25.04
Revenue Reserve (est.5%) (21,400.00) (21,400.00) - -
Interest 5,000.00 5,000.00 3,300.00 8,411.79 5,111.79
Total Operating Revenues $1,692,142.46 $1,692,142.46 $1,694,742.46 $ 1,701,267.53 $ 6,525.07
Operating Expenditures:
Irrigation&Landscaping
Landscape Imp.Project(50066)
Engineering Fees $ - $ 42,729.82 $ 4,300.00 $ 3,561.50 $ 738.50
Other Contractural Services - 311,282.02 43,579.48 37,339.51 6,239.97
Rent Equipment - 1,900.00 1,900.00 2,645.00 (745.00)
Sprinkler System Repairs - - - 2,777.09 (2,777.09)
Landscape Materials 175,000.00 232,210.50 92,900.00 75,839.95 17,060.05
Other Operating Supplies - 3,489.25 900.00 791.50 108.50
Sign Restoration Project(50103)
Traffic Signs - 36,952.00 - - -
Lake Aeration (50108)
Improvements 100,000.00 117,522.77 17,600.00 15,307.00 2,293.00
Field Site Improvements(50143) -
Improvements 64,100.00 64,100.00 28,845.00 28,612.09 232.91
Beach Renourishment(50126)
Other Contractural Services 200,000.00 600,000.00 342,000.00 341,616.11 383.89
Lake Bank Project(51026)
Swale&Slope Maintenance 406.17 - - -
Engineering Fees 72,736.31 21,818.89 19,986.54 1,832.35
Landscape Materials 178.00 - - -
Other Contractural Services 75,000.00 56,316.24 - - -
Upgrade Irrigation System(51145) -
Improvements 116,000.00 135,619.38 27,100.00 25,116.53 1,983.47
Total Project Expenditures $ 730,100.00 $1,675,442.46 $ 580,943.38 $ 553,592.82 $ 27,350.56
Page 1 of 2
Agenda Item#6e
Page 10 of 15
Non-Operating Expenditures:
Tax Collector Fees $ 10,700.00 $ 10,700.00 $ 9,600.00 $ 8,247.76 $ 1,352.24
Property Appraiser Fees 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 5,522.04 477.96
Rolled Project Funds 945,342.46 - - - -
Total Non-Operating Expenditures: $ 962,042.46 $ 16,700.00 $ 15,600.00 $ 13,769.80 $ 1,830.20
Total Expenditures $1,692,142.46 $1,692,142.46 $ 596,543.38 $ 567,362.62 $ 29480.76
Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ - $ 1,098,199.08 $1,133,904.91 $ 35,705.83
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item#6e
Page 11 of 15
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Balance Sheet-June 30,2017
Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2017
(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and Investments $ 162,778.56
Interest Receivable -
Improvements,Vehicles& Equipment 229,723.43
Due from Tax Collector -
Total Current Assets $ 392,501.99
Total Assets $ 392,501.99
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Current Liabilities
Accounts/Trade Payable $ -
Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 3,803.75
Accrued Wages Payable -
Total Liabilities $ 3,803.75
Fund Balance
Fund Balance-unreserved $ 113,012.86
Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 275,685.38
Total Fund Balance $ 388,698.24
Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 392,501.99
Agenda Item#6e
Page 12 of 15
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Income Statement w/Budget-June 30,2017
Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2017
(Unaudited)
Adopted Amended YTD YTD
Budget Budget Budget Actual Variance
Operating Revenues:
Carry Forward $ 97,579.20 $ 97,579.20 $ 97,579.20 $ 97,579.20 $ -
Special Assessment 126,900.00 126,900.00 120,600.00 121,243.30 643.30
Transfer from Tax Collector - - 7.44 7.44
Miscellaneous Income - - 46.00 46.00
Revenue Reserve(est. 5%) (6,400.00) (6,400,00) - - -
Interest 500.00 500.00 400.00 899.44 499.44
Total Operating Revenues $ 218,579.20 $ 218,579.20 $ 218,579.20 $ 219,775.38 $ 1,196.18
Operating Expenditures:
Clam Bay Restoration
Engineering Fees $ 55,000.00 $ 76,657.93 $ 46,000.00 $ 45,565.27 $ 434.73
Other Contractural Services 13,000.00 19,966.89 $ 15,000.00 13,385.00 1,615.00
Tree Trimming 38,000.00 43,390.00 $ 8,700.00 5,000.00 3,700.00
Other Equipment Repairs 500.00 1,577.77 $ - - -
Aerial Photography 7,500.00 25,698.60 $ 7,100.00 6,590.00 510.00
Minor Operating 500.00 9,688.01 $ - - -
Other Operating Supplies 2,000.00 $ - - -
Total Clam Bay Restoration $ 114,500.00 $ 178,979.20 76,800.00 $ 70,540.27 $ 6,259.73
Clam Bay Ecosystem
Engineering Fees $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Licenses and Permits - - - - -
Other Contractual Services - - - - -
Total Clam Bay Ecosystem $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Capital Expenditures:
Clam Bay Restoration
Other Machinery and Equipment $ - $ 11,000.00 $ 2,750.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 150.00
Total Capital Expenditures $ - $ 11,000.00 $ 2,750.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 150.00
Total Operating Expenditures $ 114,500.00 $ 189,979.20 $ 79,550.00 $ 73,140.27 $ 6,409.73
Page 1 of 2
Agenda Item#6e
Page 13 of 15
Non-Operating Expenditures:
Tax Collector Fees $ 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 2,850.00 $ 2,448.29 $ 401.71
Property Appraiser Fees 2,700.00 2,700.00 1,755.00 1,639.17 115.83
Rolled Project Funds 75,479.20 - - - -
Reserves for Contingencies 22,100.00 22,100.00 - - -
Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 104,079.20 $ 28,600.00 $ 4,605.00 $ 4,087,46 $ 517.54
Total Clam Bay Expenditures $ 218,579.20 $ 218,579.20 $ 84,155.00 $ 77,227.73 $ 6,927.27
Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ - $ 134,424.20 $ 142,547.65 $ 8,123.45
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item#6e
Page 14 of 15
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Income Statement w/ Budget-June 30,2017
Clam Bay Ecosystem Fund 111-FY 2017
(Unaudited)
Adopted YTD YTD
Budget Budget Actual Variance
Operating Revenues:
Fund 111 Distribution $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ -
Total Operating Revenues $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ -
Operating Expenditures:
Clam Bay EcoSystem
Engineering Fees $ - $ $ - $ -
Other Contractural Services 150,000.00 $ 90,000.00 82,942.55 7,057.45
Total Clam Bay Dreging $ 150,000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ 82,942.55 $ 7,057.45
Capital Expenditures:
Clam Bay Restoration
Improvements General $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Capital Expenditures $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Clam Bay Operating Expenditures $ 150,000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ 82,942.55 $ 7,057.45
Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 60,000.00 $ 67,057.45 $ 7,057.45
Agenda Item#6e
Page 15 of 15
Pelican Bay Services
Municipal Services Taxing Unit
Income Statement w/Budget-June 30, 2017
Clam Pass Dredging Fund 195/88032.1-FY 2017
(Unaudited)
Adopted Amended YTD YTD
Budget Budget Budget Actual Variance
Operating Revenues:
Fund 195 Distribution $ $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total Operating Revenues $ - $ - $ - $ -
Operating Expenditures:
Clam Pass Dredging(88032)
Engineering Fees $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 10,417.25 $ 582.75
General Improvements - 30,000.00 - - -
Total Clam Pass Dredging $ 20,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 10,417.25 $ 582.75
Pelican Bay Beach (90070)
Improvements General $1,250,000.00 $ 43,029.27 $ - $ - $ -
Total Capital Expenditures $ 1,250,000.00 $ 43,029.27 $ - $ - $ -
Total Clam Bay Expenditures $ 1,270,000.00 $ 93,029.27 $ 11,000.00 $ 10,417.25 $ 582.75
Agenda Item#7a
Page 1 of 2
Clam Bay Update-July 2017
Clam Pass. The excavation and grading work is expected to begin soon. Information about this
work will be provided at the July Board meeting. H&M's June tidal gauge data report and
report on the recent bathymetric survey of Clam Pass are expected soon.
Mangrove die-off. THA's June report on the mangrove die-off states that there does not
appear to be any appreciable change in the expanse of the die-off area. In February THA
estimated the die-off area to be about 8.7 acres, down from 11.66 acres in November. The
report noted some possible mangrove stress in the area between Upper Clam Bay and the bay
near Vizcaya. This is a new area, and it will continue to be monitored.
Water Quality. In April copper samples at Stations 1 and 2 in northern Clam Bay exceeded the
FDEP standard. The March copper samples at Stations 1 and 2 also exceed the FDEP standard.
Since November five of 45 copper results have exceeded the FDEP standard, an 11%
exceedance rate. A 16%or less exceedance rate for the year is acceptable. Dr.Tomasko's
second quarterly report on TN and TP for Feb., March, and April is expected in August. The
Clam Bay Committee will review the results of sediment testing at 12 sampling sites in Clam Bay
at its meeting on July 6, and a summary of the results will be provided to PBSD Board members
at the September Board meeting.
Manatee Protection Zone. The Administrative hearing requested by the Pelican Bay
Foundation to appeal the decision by FWC not to designate Clam Bay a Manatee Protection
Zone is scheduled for July 18, 19, and 20 in Tallahassee.
Prepared by Susan O'Brien
June 29, 2017
Hurniston &Moore Engineers 1 ClamPass-TIDE Page 4 of 5
Agenda Item#7a
Page 2 of 2
CLam Pass Tide Monitoring-Click hece for Maintenance Dredging Project details
Gtd(of 'a7co 4,
MARKER 4 MARKET 14 MARKER 26 MARKER 32 ,'
Ch
am Pa -t ', r ,_-
...,r t. - ( ;' to 9 r "tit
i
4 ,
-• + '' : 4 r ' ; c ', F3c7 -N ....t.ide Ga:es Location � � a. � r � , ? , tj
Monthly Time Series 2017(Click on Thumbnails to Expand)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1. it i j i '
Mean Low TideTime Lag-2017
300.0
250.0
1
e200.0 ,
y; - El Marker
" 150.0 Marker 14
u n Marker 26
100.0 1; c:Marker 32
50.0
r
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Gage/Gulf Mean Tide Ratios-2017
0.9
0.110.7
40.6 t
ui J _
i ®Marker 4
0.5
r Marker 14
0.4 ■Marker 26
. 0.3 1
I u Marker 32
E
� �{ Zp k{C a l:a , :Fe' s
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4611.
Gage/Gulf Mean Tide Ratios-2016
0.9
PASS T.S.
0.8
DREDGING i..., i T.S.COLIN HERMINE
`
0.7
P' ®Markets
t
0.5 j I r,Marker 14
t
0.4 ' ' a Marker 26
0.3 j Marker 32
I }I
0.2 i l } i creipt
0.1 f � • r I crahely
iP ,,. Jy } l et for
0 , ' , " 7 , r t ,_ '"_ ' Markers
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4&14.
http://www.humistonandmoore.com/clampass-tide 6/29/2017
Agenda Item#7b
Page 1 of 2
LANDSCAPE & SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT
TO THE PBSD BOARD JULY 5, 2017
The Landscape & Safety Committee met on June 20, 2017 at
10:15 AM at the Pelican Bay Community Center. The following
items were discussed and/or acted upon:
1 . Sgt. Thad Rhodes introduced Cpl. Natalie Ashby to the
committee as Pelican Bay's CCSO liaison officer.
2. By a unanimous vote, the committee recommends that the
PBSD not build a berm and wall along US 41 in Oak Lake
Sanctuary to achieve noise mitigation in an area ordered
cleared by the county due to invasive vegetation.
In an effort to help the property owners affected by the
clearing, staff will investigate what effective noise mitigation
is available. An onsite meeting of the committee will then
take place in order to evaluate the recommendations both
for noise and sight issues.
3. A unanimous vote of the committee recommends that
the PBSD complete the conversion to LED bulbs
throughout the remaining streets in Pelican Bay (80W bulbs
along Pelican Bay Blvd. and 30W bulbs along the residential
streets).
4. The committee voted unanimously to recommend that the
PBSD fund the construction of a cut through in the median
opposite the street exit in Oak Lake Sanctuary. We expect
Collier County to provide the necessary engineering of the
project.
Agenda Item#7b
Page 2 of 2
5. It was the unanimous consensus of the committee not to
proceed with making Gulf Park Drive & US 41 a
"Right Turn Only".
6. It was the unanimous consensus of the committee to
recommend to the full PBSD Board that the PBSD begin the
process to replace the crumbling, cracking, poorly
maintained, unsafe, non-ADA (Americans with Disabilities
Act) and unattractive asphalt County owned sidewalks.
The process can be broken down into 3 steps:
(1 ) Seek County support (i.e. county contribution in lieu of
county maintenance) and an ordinance modification
allowing the PBSD to take full responsibility for our
sidewalks and their maintenance.
(2) Determine design specifications.
(3) Determine the material nature of the sidewalk.
The next committee meeting is scheduled for July 18, 2017
at 10:15 AM at the Pelican Bay Community Center.
Submitted By: Joe Chicurel, Chairman PBSD Landscape &
Safety Committee
Agenda Item#7bi
Page 1 of 1
Estimated Cost to Replace Metal Halide Bulbs with LED Bulbs on all Remaining Pelican Bay Streets
MH Bulbs Already Replaced with LED Bulbs
No. Description Location
38 480V 80W LED Gulf Park Dr(from US 41 to Pelican Bay Blvd)
2 480V 87W LED Pelican Bay Blvd at Gulf Park Dr
1 480V 120W LED Gulf Park Dr at Green Tree Dr
1 480V 120W LED Pelican Bay Blvd at Ridgewood Dr
1 240V 30W LED Ridgewood Dr at Pelican Bay Blvd
1 240V 30W LED Pelican Bay Blvd at Glenview PI crosswalk
REMAINING 480V MH BULBS
Remaining 480V MH Bulbs to be Replaced with LED Bulbs and Estimated Costs
OPTION 1 No. Description Unit Price Extended Price
241 480V 250W LED $ 179 $ 43,139
Shipping 7% $ 12.53 $ 3,020
$ 46,159
with 10%Contingency $ 4,616 $ 50,775 Subtotal
REMAINING 240V MH BULBS
Remaining 240V MH Bulbs to be Replaced with LED Bulbs and Estimated Costs
No. Description Unit Price Extended Price
179 240V 30W LED $ 71 $ 12,673
Shipping 7% $ 5 $ 887
$ 13,560
with 10%Contingency $ 1,356 $ 14,916 Subtotal
$ 65,691 Total
N ,-
H
v]
°� m 0 o O o o O o 0 0 O o 0 0 00
0 o O o 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 0
COc d C O p O O p O• O O O O O O O O r
aa) `< 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 o g O 'C ' o0 00 o ''
a H _ bb bNs 64 EA 6s ds ER 69 69 EA
0
H
J
Q
I-
0
F-
H F-
C/] O O O O O O O O O 0
O O O O O O p O
p 0O O O O
0
U O O O O O O O O O O O O O
W
O O O O O O O O OO O O O O
H O O O O 69NNO O fl
NN64 -. 6964EA 0CK
64 ,., ER 64 En669 69 EA
d
I—
C
CD
O
L
0
CC
08 O F-
z 00 N ,6 N — .-
CD
cnz a
a) O O H CI
U Uv) vp CA CA CA >, >- >. zz L>.. CA CA w
z - - .-7 a - v cn F- a .a .a X
.0 WO
d
C Z
_ O
Z
>• 'a
O
N
O ct
U Q
C• ? z
al▪ J
• W a
CO)
• a o
° z o
a
O O F
CL --ate. Q U
¢ x U
•L U U U
0 W ¢ O ',',1 W
C + o c, L4 Q
co v U U
a O .7.-,Cs. U F" .
,.- o
> U w Z z
U' z F-' w U L-': Z o ¢ F C
oa- W WQ F-, U O O- F- FH 7
N c Z
CO O . O , C7
N o
oU w ZW U
".
m z MPG tea' U UU .— U a w y
z F- U u, U Cox ou
O ¢ U z o o F- co w U w z w
N ¢ v H ¢ ,J �, up . > H 0.¢ ¢
j o N z ¢ W W ¢ ¢ Pa ¢ 0. U C7 Z
E w U cC U O H O p U q z F-
N n °a w o z C U a H a z z z z
N 0 00 O ,� w ¢ C7
Z a 0 U g x pe w H O D oU U co oU
c0'n
mo Z -
Z C N M V '!1 'O N 00 Q, ON M V
U• a. C
.(1> F-
a.. 0 a
4P,...-.;`:
` t GREEN TKE ��" :� ,,,, ,,•...-
*;:
°
',`''' - ... : milos0e ,,,,, '''
k
Air,' „...**-.,,, ' ' ''', 1 .1#114- '
4 �'�
—
''''..-':: " ,,: ' - ,' , ,, 4# „I-144(F' T j ' -`' .1k, 1 1 '
,,:v,„,,, , ,,, ..„, ,..„.„.„,_ ,, : „
,.,,,.,.. , ' .,,,,. .gt.t.„ ' .
, � �., �. '" - ' ll; O"
. 3*, .,„, ., , , ��
.„„„„ ,
7,,,,, ,
I:=4,1°,'-:. 4�.`.° ear;
r,:''''1'1:-,`''; t
: `
.I t.�t' .7C7 I OT �, {a
ALI- te
'''.. 1:.-,,':-.'11.'-':',.. 1.;4-1';.,','‘ ---:'-' ,.*11'4:-.,:f3,,,,,,'',:'''..,„......: .., '., 1 ",47.,I:: ,g,j. 4„.,,,,,,-'74i,,. ,H III'',.0,1t..I40.--„ ",-..::1:1 .k.,.4.$,I. '
„„ m o L.1 „_--4, ;--,- ;;
�e
,
°"M � '
-
r YZ 'c �: -D o
mss
at4
d
�
ass ,I -' s i;\t i., -� N-�+
mD
US 41
. iI
5/16/2017 Collier County,FL Land Development Code Agenda Item#7biii
Page 1 of 7
6.06.02- Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements
A. All developments must construct sidewalks , bike lanes , and pathways , as described below. For
projects subject to architectural design standards, see LDC section 5.05.08 F. for related provisions.
1. Sidewalks and bike lanes must be constructed within public and private rights-of-way or
easements, which are adjacent to the site prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for
construction authorized by a final subdivision plat, site improvement, or site development plan,
unless otherwise determined by the County Manager or designee, as follows:
Typical Sidewalks Z loth sides 1, Bike Lanes—Both sides 1,2'3
Cross
Section
6 feet wide 5 feet wide
Arterials and collectors X X
Local/Internal Accessway X
1 - Except that only required on one side (closest to the development)where right-of-way is
adjacent to, but not within,the subject development and except as set forth below in this section.
2- Unless otherwise determined by the County Manager, or designee, that the existing ROW cross-
section is physically constrained or construction would result in unsafe conditions.
3- Unless otherwise identified on the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan Update, as
amended, as a potential off-street pathway corridor.
2. Sidewalks and bike lanes must be constructed within public and private rights-of-way or
easements ,which are internal to the site, as follows:
Typical ks—Both sides 1, Bike Lanes—Both sides 1,2,3,4,6
zS, ,�
Cross
Section
6 feet wide 5 feet wide
Arterials and collectors X X
https://www.municode.com/librarylfl/collier_county/codes/land development_code?nodeld=CH6lNIMADPUFARE_6.06.00TRSYST 6.06.02SIBILAPARE 1/7
5/16/2017 Collier County,FL Land Development Code Agenda Item#7biii
Page 2 of 7
Local/Internal Accessway X
1 - Except that only required on one side (closest to the development )where right-of-way is
adjacent to, but not within, the subject development and except as set forth below in this section.
2- Unless otherwise determined by the County Manager, or designee, that the existing ROW cross-
section is physically constrained or construction would result in unsafe conditions.
3- Except that for residential development projects where 75 percent or more of that project's land
area has been approved as of March 8, 2005 for site development plans or final subdivision plats
with sidewalks or bike lanes that are only required on one side of the ROW, then all applications
for subsequent site development plans or final subdivision plat may be approved with sidewalks
or bike lanes on only one side of the ROW .
4- For development projects seeking approval of a final subdivision plat or site development plan
of 4 or fewer dwelling units per gross acre and where 15 or fewer dwelling units front on a ROW
that terminates in a cul-de-sac , then sidewalks will only be required on one side of the ROW and
not around the circumference of the cul-de-sac .
5- Prior to the issuance of individual certificates of occupancy, the required sidewalks along the
individual parcels frontage shall be constructed.
6- Prior to the issuance of 75 percent of the certificates of occupancy authorized by a final
subdivision plat, site improvement or site development plan, all sidewalks and bike lanes shall be
constructed, unless otherwise determined by the County Manager or designee.
3. Required pathways , as identified in the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan, must be
constructed a minimum of 12 feet in width, within public and private rights-of-way or easements,
which are adjacent to or internal to the site. Prior to issuance of the first permanent certificate of
occupancy for construction, authorized by a final subdivision plat, site improvement, or site
development plan, all required pathways shall be provided, unless otherwise determined by the
County Manager or designee.
4. For single-family and multi-family site development and site improvement projects within all
conventional zoning districts and all single-family and multi-family residential components of PUD
districts:
a. Sidewalks , Five feet in width, must be provided within a dedicated public or private right-of-
way or other internal access. Where there is no public or private right-of-way or internal access
way proposed within a development, sidewalks must be constructed in accordance with Code
https://www.municode.com/Iibrary/fl/cdlier_county/codes/land development_code?nodeld=CH6INIMADPUFARE_6.06.00TRSYST 6.06.02SIBILAPARE 2/7
5/16/2017 Collier County,FL Land Development Code Agenda Item#7biii
Page 3 of 7
standards contained herein to connect from each on-site residential building to a sidewalk
within an adjacent private or public right-of-way or, if no sidewalk exists therein, must connect
to the edge of the adjacent paved road within the right-of-way.
b. Alternative sidewalk designs that are determined by the County Manager, or designee, to be at
least equivalent in function and area to that which would otherwise be required and would
serve each dwelling unit, may be approved. Should a two-directional shared use pathway be
proposed as an alternative design, then the minimum paved width of the pathway must not be
less than 10 feet.
5. All sidewalks and bike lanes must also be constructed in accordance with design specifications
identified in subsection F., below.
6. All bicycle lanes must also have signage and be marked in accordance with the latest edition of the
U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
7. Sidewalks and bike paths at intersections shall continue to the edge of curb as depicted by
Illustrations 1 and 2.
https://www.municode.com/library/fl/collier_county/codes/land development_code?nodeld=CH6INIMADPUFARE_6.06.00TRSYST 6.06.02SIBILAPARE 3/7
5/16/2017 Collier County,FL Land Development Code Agenda Item#7biii
Page 4 of 7
Illustration 1
https://www.municode.com/library/fl/collier_county/codes/land development_code?nodeld=CH6INIMADPUFARE_6.06.00TRSYST 6.06.02SIBILAPARE 4/7
5/16/2017 Collier County,FL Land Development Code Agenda Item#7biii
Page 5 of 7
Illustration 2
8. Two curb ramps shall be provided for sidewalks and bike paths at each street corner of an
intersection. Curb ramps shall be a minimum of 36 inches in width and shall not rise at a ratio
greater than as outlined by the Florida accessibility code for building construction.
9. Crosswalks shall be required at any intersection where the distance to the nearest crosswalk is
greater than 1,000 feet.
B. All developments required to provide interconnections to existing and future developments must
dedicate sufficient right-of-way or easement for all required roads, sidewalks , and bike lanes . Bike
lanes and sidewalks interconnections must be constructed concurrently with the required road
interconnection.
C. Payment-in-lieu of construction or construction at an alternate site, as set forth below, may be
authorized or required as part of any corresponding development order or permit, at the discretion of
the County manager or designee, for any or all of the following circumstances:
1. Where planned right-of-way improvements are scheduled in the County's capital improvements
program (CIP), any governmental entity's adopted five-year work program, or any developer's
written commitment approved by the County.
2.
https://www.municode.com/library/fl/collier_county/codes/land development code?nodeld=CH6INIMADPU FARE_6.06.00TRSYST 6.06.02SIBILAPARE 5/7
5/16/2017 Collier County,FL Land Development Code Agenda Item#7biii
Page 6 of 7
The cost of proposed sidewalks or bike lanes would be greater than 25 percent of the
development's cost of improvements as determined by the project engineer's estimate approved
by the County Manager, or designee, or
3. An existing development has not been constructed with sidewalks or bike lanes and no future
connectivity of one or more of these facilities is anticipated by the Comprehensive Pathways Plan or
within the Plan's current five-year work program.
D. In lieu of construction of required sidewalks , bike lanes and pathways , all developments approved or
required to make payments-in-lieu must either:
1. Provide funds for the cost of sidewalks , bike lanes and pathways construction prior to the release
of the corresponding development review for final subdivision plat, site improvement, or site
development plan , except as stipulated within an approved zoning ordinance or resolution as set
forth in the Schedule of Development of Review and Building Permit Fees adopted in the Collier
County Administrative Code into a Pathway fund or identified CIP project; or
2. Identify and commit to constructing a project with an equivalent length of sidewalk in an area
identified in the Needs Plan of the Comprehensive Pathway Plan and approved by the County
Manager or designee. The selected project must connect to an existing sidewalk on at least one
side and if the remaining side does not connect with an existing sidewalk, it must be connected to
the edge of the existing pavement. The construction of the sidewalk must be completed prior to
issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for construction authorized by a final subdivision plat,
site improvement, or site development plan, unless otherwise determined by the County Manager
or designee.
E. If payment-in-lieu is the recommendation by the County Manager or designee, such funds will be used
by the County for future construction of required sidewalks, bike lanes and pathways , and system
improvements to the bicycle and pedestrian network at locations as close in proximity to the subject
site as is feasible. Funds provided as payments-in-lieu do not release the developer from meeting these
requirements if the payment-in-lieu amount is less than what would otherwise be required to
completely construct all of the required sidewalks , bike lanes and pathways . In that event, the
development will continue to be obligated to pay or construct the outstanding requirements until fully
paid or constructed, except that partial payments previously made will fully vest that portion paid. Any
future payments-in-lieu will be applied to the developer's continuing obligation to construct sidewalks ,
bike lanes and pathways under the current LDC specifications.
F. Sidewalk,Bike Lane, andPathwayDesign& Construction/Materials. All workmanship materials, methods
of placement, curing,forms,foundation, finishing, etc. shall be in conformance to the latest edition of
FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and FDOT Design Standards.
1. All sidewalks shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the following:
a. Concrete sidewalks for roads with a functional classification as an arterial or collector or that is
County maintained shall be a minimum of 6 inches thick of concrete and constructed over a
compacted subgrade.
https://www.municode.com/library/fl/collier_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeld=CH6INIMADPUFARE_6.06.00TRSYST_6.06.02SIBILAPARE 6r/
5/16/2017 Collier County,FL Land Development Code Agenda Item#7biii
Page 7of
b. Concrete sidewalks for non-County maintained roads with a functional classification as local or
with no functional classification (i.e., drive or accessways) shall be a minimum of 4 inches thick
of concrete and constructed over a compacted subgrade.
c. Paver brick sidewalks or paver brick accents in sidewalks must be installed over a 4-inch thick,
compacted limerock base and sand cushion per manufacture specifications, except as
otherwise allowed above for sidewalks.
2. All bike lanes shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the most current "Florida
Bicycle Facilities Design Standards and Guidelines" or the "Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards
for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways" (commonly known as the
"Florida Greenbook") requirements.
3. All pathways shall be designed in accordance with the most current FDOT Bicycle Facilities Planning
and Design Handbook as it pertains to shared use pathways . Below are the preferred standards
for pathway construction; however, if the applicant can demonstrate that a lesser cross-section
will meet the requirements of the County, then upon the approval of the County Manager, or
designee, it may be permitted. Pathways may be constructed of the following types of materials:
a. Concrete- County maintained pathways shall be constructed of a minimum of 6 inches of
Portland cement concrete over a compacted subgrade. Pathways on non-County maintained
roads with a functional classification as local or with no functional classification shall be
constructed of a minimum of 4 inches of Portland cement concrete over a compacted
subgrade.
b. Asphalt-All pathways constructed of asphalt shall contain a minimum of 6 inches stabilized
subgrade (LBR 40), 6 inches compacted limerock base, and 1.5 inches Type S-III asphaltic
concrete, unless an alternate cross-section is otherwise determined to be acceptable by the
County Manager, or designee.
(Ord. No. 05-17, § 3; Ord. No. 06-63, § 3.JJ; Ord. No. 12-38, § 3.AA; Ord. No. 13-56, § 3.EE; Ord. No. 14-33, §
3.X; Ord. No. 16-22, § 3.M)
https://www.municode.com/library/fl/collier_county/codes/land development code?nodeld=CH6INIMADPUFARE_6.06.00TRSYST 6.06.02SIBILAPARE 7/7
Agenda Item#7biii-a
Page 1 of 5
From: Joseph Chicurel
To: SheaBarbara
Cc: JacobLisa;NeilDorrlll; McCaughtrvMary
Subject: Resident Sidewalk Issues for 7/5/17 PBSD Mtg.
Date: Wednesday,June 28,2017 7:56:07 AM
Attachments: VoiceMessaae.wav
ATT00001.htm
Collier County,FL Land Development Code Sidewalk,Pathway reouirements.odf
ATT00002.htm
Original Message
From: Maureen Mitchell [mailto:maureen18Ame.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2017 7:46 PM
To: officeApelicanbayservicesdivision.net
Subject: Landscape and Safety Committee
I would like to make a complaint about bicycle riders on the sidewalks of Pelican
Bay. Saturday,April 15, I was walking on Pelican Bay Boulevard in front of the
St Raphael at about 2:00 pm. A young man on a bicycle came from behind me
going very fast. He hit my shoulder with his elbow and arm and sped past me.
Fortunately, I did not fall down and was not injured. I yelled out in surprise and
but he never looked back or slowed down. I have normal hearing, and was not
wearing headphones, and feel certain that he did not warn me of his approach.
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your
e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send
electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in
writing.
Begin forwarded message:
From: ResnickLisa <LResnick@colliergov.net>
Subject: Update: RE: Resident Request to Repair Greentree Drive
Agenda Item#7biii-a
Page 2 of 5
Pathway
Date: July 17, 2015 at 3:03:13 PM EDT
To: LynchDiane <DianeLynch ancolliergov.net>, BolickMarion
<MarionBolick@colliergov.net>, McCaughtryMary
<MaryMcCaughtryancolliergov.net>, "Joe Chicurel (jchicurel@gmail.com)"
<jchicurel@gmail.com>, "Dee Emerson (Dee@dmgfl.com)"
<Dee@dmgfl.com>
An update on resident request earlier today to repair pathways on Greentree
adjacent to Oakmont:
I just spoke with Matthew Graham. A substantial portion of this pathway will be
scheduled to be repaired and signs informing the public of the imminent repairs
will be placed on site by next Tuesday.
I called Mrs. Johnson back to let her know the good news. She is extremely
happy and asked that I pass along her great big thank you to Diane and Matthew!
Thanks,
Lisa
From: LynchDiane
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 11:31 AM
To: ResnickLisa
Cc: BolickMarion; McCaughtryMary
Subject: RE: Resident Request to Repair Greentree Drive Pathway
Thanks Lisa,
I have forwarded Service Request 10733 to Matthew for his review.
Diane
From: ResnickLisa
Sent: Friday,July 17, 2015 10:42 AM
To: LynchDiane
Cc: BolickMarion; McCaughtryMary
Subject: Resident Request to Repair Greentree Drive Pathway
Hello Diane,
We just received a call from Pelican Bay resident Irma Johnson (239-598-2063)
who informed us that the pathway on Greentree Drive adjacent to Oakmont has
some damage/cracks due to tree roots that makes it difficult for her to walk on
with a walker. Would you please have someone check this?
Thanks, Lisa
Lisa Jacob,MSM
Pelican Bay Services Division
Municipal Services Taxing&Benefit Unit
Collier County Government
Agenda Item#7biii-a
Page 3 of 5
801 Laurel Oak Drive,Suite 302
Naples,FL 34108
(239)597-1749 office
(239)438-5239 mobile
(239)597-4502 fax
Iresnick@colliergov.net
Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to
a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in
writing.
Begin forwarded message:
From: JacobLisa <LisaJacob@colliergov.net>
Subject: Fwd: Pelican Bay Walkways
Date: May 2, 2017 at 12:52:48 PM EDT
To: Joe Chicurel <jchicurel( gmail.com>
Cc: SheaBarbara <BarbaraShea@colliergov.net>, McCaughtryMary
<MaryMcCaughtryt7colliergov.net>, BolickMarion
<MarionBolick@colliergov.net>, Dee Emerson <Dee@dmgfl.com>,
NeilDorrill <neil@dmgfl.com>, "Scott William Streckenbein"
<sstreckenbeinc yahoo.com>, Frank Laney <flaney@pelicanbay.org>
Hello Dr. Chicurel, this is just an FYI member comment that was received by the
PBF and forwarded to us. Lisa
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Arlene Harper
<aharper@pelicanbay.org<mailto:aharper@pelicanbay.org>>
Date: April 29, 2017 at 10:33:38 AM EDT
To: Lisa Warren
<LWarren@pelicanbay.org<mailto:LWarren@pelicanbay.org>>, James
Hoppensteadt<jimh@pelicanbay.org<mailto:jimh@pelicanbay.org>>
Cc: Jilberto Nieto <JNieto@pelicanbay.org<mailto:JNieto@pelicanbay.org>>
Subject: FW: Pelican Bay Walkways
Member comment.
Arlene Harper
Pelican Bay Foundation
From: Linda Harden
[lindamharden@gmai l.com<mailto:1 indamharden@gmai i.com>]
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 10:31 AM
To: Pelican Bay Foundation
Subject: Pelican Bay Walkways
Agenda Item#7biii-a
Page 4 of 5
Just an FYI -- a friend of ours tripped and fell on the EXTREMELY poorly
maintained asphalt walkways in Pelican Bay. He ended up cracking 3 ribs. I
sincerely wish that while Pelican Bay is spending money hand over fist that the
powers that be would consider doing what Collier County cannot seem to do and
that is to replace the cheap, asphalt walkways...which are dangerous....with real
cement sidewalks which you would think would be demanded in an upscale
community that you claim to be.
Sent from my iPad.
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your
e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send
electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in
writing.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Frank Laney <flaney@pelicanbay.org>
Subject: RE: Pelican Bay Walkways
Date: May 3, 2017 at 10:08:21 AM EDT
To: 'JacobLisa' <LisaJacob@colliergov.net>
Cc: SheaBarbara <BarbaraShea@colliergov.net>, McCaughtryMary
<MaryMcCaughtry@colliergov.net>, BolickMarion
<MarionBolick@colliergov.net>, Dee Emerson <Dee@dmgfl.com>,
NeilDorrill <neil@dmgfl.com>, "Scott William Streckenbein"
<sstreckenbein@yahoo.com>, Joe Chicurel <jchicurel@gmail.com>
Hey Lisa, Just a follow-up on that fall I asked you about yesterday. Mrs. Hardin is
reporting this incident on behalf of her friend David Eskra. He walks to
Waterside and back from Bay Colony on the east side of Pelican Bay Blvd. so it
could be anywhere. I've asked that he give me a call with a specific location. I'll
let you know what I hear.
From: Cisco Unity Connection Messaging System
[mailto:unityconnection@pelicanbay.org]
Sent: Wednesday,May 3, 2017 9:31 AM
To:Janeyf@pelicanbay.org
Subject: Message from Harden Linda(2395941332)
Follow up message.
Original Message
From: JacobLisa [mailto:LisaJacob@colliergov.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 12:53 PM
To: Joe Chicurel
Cc: SheaBarbara; McCaughtryMary; BolickMarion; Dee Emerson; NeilDorrill;
Scott William Streckenbein; Frank Laney
Subject: Fwd: Pelican Bay Walkways
Agenda Item#7biii-a
Page 5 of 5
Hello Dr. Chicurel,this is just an FYI member comment that was received by the
PBF and forwarded to us. Lisa
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Arlene Harper
<aharper@pelicanbay.org<mailto:aharper@pelicanbay.org>>
Date: April 29, 2017 at 10:33:38 AM EDT
To: Lisa Warren
<LWarren@pelicanbay.org<mailto:LWarren@pelicanbay.org>>, James
Hoppensteadt<jimh@pelicanbay.org<maiIto jimh@pelicanbay.org>>
Cc: Jilberto Nieto <JNieto@pelicanbay.org<mailto:JNieto@pelicanbay.org >
Subject: FW: Pelican Bay Walkways
Member comment.
Arlene Harper
Pelican Bay Foundation
From: Linda Harden
[lindamharden@gmail.com<mailto:lindamharden@gmai l.com>]
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 10:31 AM
To: Pelican Bay Foundation
Subject: Pelican Bay Walkways
Just an FYI -- a friend of ours tripped and fell on the EXTREMELY poorly
maintained asphalt walkways in Pelican Bay. He ended up cracking 3 ribs. I
sincerely wish that while Pelican Bay is spending money hand over fist that the
powers that be would consider doing what Collier County cannot seem to do and
that is to replace the cheap, asphalt walkways...which are dangerous....with real
cement sidewalks which you would think would be demanded in an upscale
community that you claim to be.
Sent from my iPad.
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your
e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send
electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in
writing.
Agenda Item#7biii-b
Page 1 of 5
From: ,)oseDh Chicurel
To: SheaBarbar8
Subject: Resident Complaints Re:PB Sidewalks
Date: Wednesday,June 28,2017 7:58:33 AM
Begin forwarded message:
From: Joseph Chicurel <jchicurel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bicycles on sidewalk
Date: April 30, 2014 at 10:49:31 PM EDT
To: Mary McClean Johnson <sellnaples@hotmail.com>
Hi Mary,
As you may know the PBSD formed a standing committee to address safety
issues in
Pelican Bay and it was overdue. Now that there is a forum to address resident's
concerns and issues,we need to hear from the community.
I thank you for adding your voice and experience to the dialogue that I hope to
create.
Please make any suggestions that you think may help the PBSD and my
committee
better address these problems.
I realize that only courtesy and respect for the wellbeing of others, and
compliance with the law can truly change most of these issues but we will try our
best.
Thanks again for your e-mail and informations, Joe
On Apr 30, 2014, at 10:44 AM,Mary J. Johnson<sellnaples@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Dear Joe, as part of the everyday walkers in Pelican Bay I have had
several bad experiences with bikers this season. Most annoying and
dangerous was a group of 12 bikers who came up behind me with no
bells. This was an organized group as they all had matching t-shirts. I
don't believe they were from Pelican Bay. Any group that large
should be in the street. They expected me to get off the sidewalk...no
thank you or excuse me. It was a Tuesday morning and I have
watched for them again but have not seen them. I did yell at the man
bringing up the rear that they should be in the street, but he must have
Agenda Item#7biii-b
Page 2 of 5
been deft as he didn't respond. I feel that many of the sidewalk riders
are tourists that are riding rental bikes so I don't know how easy it
will be to educate them on bike rules. Thanks for your efforts in
protecting those of us who enjoy are daily walks.
Mary Johnson
Sent from Mary Johnson
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kathy Forte <kfortel2@gmail.com>
Subject: Another Close Call
Date: May 28, 2014 at 8:53:49 AM EDT
To: Joe Chicurel <jchicurel@gmail.com>
Hi, Joe -- I have another one for you. Ed Massaglia, who lives in the Montenero,
said that while he was walking Monday morning on the pathway, he was brushed
by a bike.
The woman on the bike (who was of our vintage in age) only sounded her bell and
said "On your left" when she was a few feet behind him. As he moved to get out
of the way, she passed him and nicked him with her arm (he thought it was her
arm). He said: "I have the right of way." Her response, "No you don't, asshole!"
Can you believe it?Not only does he almost get hit,he gets verbally abused. And
he's a very nice, low key guy.
For what it's worth ....
Kathy
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kathy Forte <kfortel2@gmail.com>
Subject: SUGGESTION: Pelican Bay Pedestrian/Bike Safety
Date: April 4, 2014 at 12:43:42 PM EDT
To: Iresnick@colliergov.net
Cc: Joe Chicurel <jchicurel@gmaii.com>, Jim Forte
<james.v.forte@gmail.com>
Dear Mr. Trecker-- I am writing to you in your role as chair of the PBSD Board. I have been
a resident of Pelican Bay for 6 years. I have a suggestion to improve pedestrian safety,
particularly as it relates to bikes..
First, a little background: I have been a longtime walker/jogger(almost daily) on the
pathways parallel to Pelican Bay Blvd., Gulf Park Dr., and Greentree Rd. I have always
been very tuned into safety issues, but even more so since March 6, when I was hit by a
Agenda Item#7biii-b
Page 3 of 5
bike.
A friend and I were walking north on the sidewalk on the east side of PB Blvd., about 30-40
ft. north of the Interlachan entrance. Suddenly,we saw a bike wheel between us; no bell, no
verbal warning. We both tried to jump out of the way, but the bike turned into me, gouging
my right calf with the pedal and bumping my hip and shoulder. The biker was a women in
her early 20s; she had ear buds on. I asked her why she didn't warn us she was behind us
with either her bell (she had one)or voice, and why in the world she tried to pass between
us. No response. Just a meek apology. My husband reported the incident to the Services
Division and, at their request, also to the Sheriffs Office. It was a nasty gash and it is still
healing. Happily, I am walking again, but with a lot of nervousness.
My observations:
1. Most of the bikers on the sidewalk expect pedestrians to get out of THEIR way
2. Many do not sound a warming if approaching from behind--either by bell or voice.
3. About 30% of the bikers are wearing head sets or ear buds.
4. The majority of the transgressors are visitors(who don't read the articles in the PB Post
or the e-mail newsletter on bike rules).
Ideally, all bikes would have to ride on the road, leaving the sidewalk for pedestrians; I
know this was already proposed and shot down several years ago. I also know that the
proposal to widen the sidewalks was shot down 3 years ago. My husband and I supported
both of these proposals; it's unfortunate they were rejected.
My suggestion:
Put up signs at to-be-determined intervals along the sidewalks, particularly on PB Blvd &
Gulf Park Dr., that tell bikers what the rules are. The signs could be on posts or affixed to
trees(without harming the trees, of course) so that those riding bikes on the sidewalk would
have to see them. They should say something like this:
BIKES
ALWAYS yield to pedestrians-- both ways.
Give sufficient warning with bell or voice.
Pass on the left.
No headphones or ear buds.
It's the law!!!
Of course there has to be a way to enforce the rules. I was not able to get
the name or number the biker who hit me because I was focused on my
injury and how to get help. Maybe the hosts of the transgressors need to
be cited too, because they are obviously not relaying the rules to their
guests.
Separately, I have recently noticed more and more people (mostly visitors,
but also residents) who are NOT crossing PB Blvd. at the designated
crosswalks (i.e. they are jaywalking) and they expect cars to stop for them.
Some cars do, some don't (which creates more confusion). This is a very
unsafe practice on pedestrians' part; they should be aware that if they
choose to jaywalk, they will have to wait for the cars to pass first.
Thank you very much for your consideration of my suggestion. I love living
Agenda Item#7biii-b
Page 4 of 5
in Pelican Bay and want to do whatever I can to make it the best it can
be. Thanks also for your efforts on our behalf.
Kathy Forte
1705 Montenero
239-431-5612
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Mary J. Johnson" <sellnaples@hotmail.com>
Subject: Bicycles on sidewalk
Date: April 30, 2014 at 10:44:04 AM EDT
To: "jchicurel@gmail.com" <jchicurel@gmail.com>
Dear Joe, as part of the everyday walkers in Pelican Bay I have had several bad
experiences with bikers this season. Most annoying and dangerous was a group of
12 bikers who came up behind me with no bells. This was an organized group as
they all had matching t-shirts. I don't believe they were from Pelican Bay. Any
group that large should be in the street. They expected me to get off the
sidewalk...no thank you or excuse me. It was a Tuesday morning and I have
watched for them again but have not seen them. I did yell at the man bringing up
the rear that they should be in the street, but he must have been deft as he didn't
respond. I feel that many of the sidewalk riders are tourists that are riding rental
bikes so I don't know how easy it will be to educate them on bike rules. Thanks
for your efforts in protecting those of us who enjoy are daily walks.
Mary Johnson
Sent from Mary Johnson
Begin forwarded message:
From: Dean Malenfant <pparis1958@yahoo.com>
Subject: Cyclists
Date: April 22, 2014 at 11:41:44 AM EDT
To: "jchicurel@gmail.com" <jchicurel@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Dean Malenfant <pparis1958 anyahoo.com>
Dear Joe,
I was talking to Kathy Forte this morning, and she was telling me about her accident when a
cyclist knocked her down and took a gouge out of her leg.
I am a daily walker(do not drive anymore), and I have more concerns with cyclists than I do
with motorists. I walk from L'Ambiance, along Pelican Bay Boulevard and then walk along
the berm, I would say that at least 95% of the cyclists do not use their bells, It's surprising
how quiet cyclists can come up behind you; and saying "On your left" isn't quite adequate
enough-especially for people with hearing problems. Whereas a shrill bell is obvious and
can be heard very well.
My first suggestion is that cyclists should be banned from using the narrow sidewalk. Or,
widen the sidewalk. Best of all have a dedicated cycling path in the roadway.
And single file only-last week a family came swooping up from behind me and one almost
Agenda Item#7biii-b
Page 5 of 5
clipped me, as he was cycling alongside his family. That's not the first time that has
happened.
Make the speed limit very low indeed, so that if they want to go faster they should be on the
road.
The berm is for observing nature, strolling, conversing with friends, or jogging - it is not an
exercise route for bicycles and roller blades. The latter swoop from side to side, last week
on Pelican Bay Blvd. a man got quite angry with me because I didn't go on the grass as he
swept by me-yelling: "Hey Lady, didn't you hear me"-needless to say my blood pressure
rose!!!
Well enough. I chat with other walkers and they all agree with me re the above concerns.
Aida Malenfant
See my photos of Boston, Paris&the UK at http://www.bostonbyaida.com/
Agenda Item#7biii-c
Page 1 of 2
From: )acobLisa
To: SheaBarbara
Subject: FW: Sidewalk or Pathway?
Date: Friday,June 30,2017 4:20:39 PM
This is the email but without the attachment.
Original Message
From:Jim Carr[mailto:jim.carr@abbinc.com]
Sent:Wednesday,May 17,2017 12:08 PM
To:JacobLisa
Cc:Joe Chicurel;SheaBarbara
Subject:RE:Sidewalk or Pathway?
Lisa,
This might be more than you need,but here are some definitions,and attached is section from the Collier County
Land Development Code(LDC):
SIDEWALK
Chapter 8 of the FDOT Plans and Preparation Manual Volume 1.
8.3.1 Sidewalks:
"Sidewalks are walkways parallel to the roadway and designed for use by pedestrians.Generally,sidewalks should
be constructed along both sides of arterial roadways that are not provided with shoulders"
The min width of sidewalk is 5'on both curb and gutter and flush shoulder roadways,with a minimum separation
from back of curb of 2'. If the sidewalk is adjacent to the curb the minimum width is 6'. Grades shall allow
adequate drainage but maintain ADA requirements. A clear I'wide graded area with 1:6 max slope shall be
provided,and edge drops off should be avoided.
Collier County Land Development Code:
Sidewalk:That portion of a right-of-way or cross or crosswalk,paved or otherwise surfaced,intended for pedestrian
use and bicycle use.(See Chapters 4 and 10).
Sidewalks must be 5'wide and provided with dedicated public or private right of way or internal access.
Construction material consist of a minimum 4"concrete for non-county maintained roads and 6"minimum for
country maintained roads,both constructed over compacted subgrade. Sidewalks can also be paver brick over 4"
thick compacted limerock base w/paver sand per manufacture specs.
PATHWAY
Chapter 8 of the FDOT Plans and Preparation Manual Volume 1.
8.6 Shared Use Paths:
"Shared use paths are typically facilities on exclusive rights of way and with minimal cross flow of motor vehicles.
They are almost always used by pedestrians,joggers,in-line skaters,bicyclists,and in some cases equestrians.
However,the bicycle's operating characteristics will dictate the design of shared use paths.The criteria in this
section apply to paved shared use paths"
Typically, 10'-14'wide depending on use and variety of users(bicyclist,pedestrians,joggers,skaters).ADA
Requirements shall be met regarding sloping and ramps etc... 4-foot lateral offset to obstruction shall be
maintained,as well as 2 feet wide, 1:6 max slope adjacent to both sides.
Collier County Land Development Code:
Pathway:A defined corridor for the primary use of non-motorized travel.
All pathways shall be designed in accordance with the most current FDOT Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design
Handbook as it pertains to shared use pathways. Pathways Construction material consist of a minimum 4"concrete
for non-county maintained roads and 6"minimum for county maintained roads,both constructed over compacted
subgrade. Or Pathways can be Asphalt at a minimum of 6 inches stabilized subgrade(LBR 40),6 inches
Agenda Item#7biii-c
Page 2 of 2
compacted limerock base,and 1.5 inches Type S-III asphaltic concrete.
James A.Carr,P.E.
Agnoli,Barber&Brundage,Inc.
7400 Trail Boulevard,Suite 200
Naples,FL 34108
239.597.3111 ext 215
239.566.2203 fax
Original Message
From:JacobLisa[Ynailto:LisaJacob@colliergov.nel]
Sent:Tuesday,May 16,2017 11:43 AM
To:Jim Carr<jim.carr@abbinc.com>
Cc:Joe Chicurel<jchicurel@gmail.com>;SheaBarbara<BarbaraShea@colliergov.net>
Subject:Sidewalk or Pathway?
Hello Jim,
The landscape and safety committee wants to know what the difference is between a"sidewalk"and a"pathway".
Would you please help answer this question?
Thanks,Lisa
Sent from my iPhone
Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response
to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in
writing.
Agenda Item#7c
Page 1 of 9
TO: PBSD Board of Directors
FROM: Dave Trecker
SBUJECT: Pelican Bay Beach Renourishment
DA'L'E: June 29, 2017
The Beach Renourishment Committee met on 5/31/17 and unanimously
passed the following resolution:
To recommend to the PBSD Board that no sand-haul renourishment of
the Pelican Bay beach be carried out in 2017 and that the PBSD Board
so notify Coastal Zone Management.
Background information is given in Attachments 1 — 3.
Humiston& Moore indicated the four Collier beaches recently surveyed
were by-and-large healthy, including the Pelican Bay beach, where average
width increased slightly since 2016. They recommended no renourishment
this year (Attachment 4). Gary McAlpin, head of Coastal Zone Management,
agreed that additional renourishment was not warranted at this time.
The Beach Renourishment Committee considered three options.
(1) Fund no truck-haul renourishment this year.
(2) If the county proceeds with a major truck haul in 2017, fund
renourishment of one or more sections where the width remains short
of the 100-foot county target (R-35, R-36, R-40). Since the 5/31/17
committee meeting, McAlpin advised he plans no county truck-
haul renourishment this year. That eliminates this option.
(3) If the county does not proceed with a truck haul this year, go it alone
and fund renourishment as indicated above.
Option 1 would allow us to retain the $422,175 beach reserve, build toward
major projects in 2018 and beyond and hedge against sand loss from a major
storm.
Option 3 would deplete much or all of the beach reserve.
The PBSD Board needs to inform CZM of its decision in early July.
Agenda Item#7c
Page 2 of 9
ATTACHMENT 1
ORDINANCE NO.2013-61
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2002-27,
AS AMENDED, WHICH CREATED THE PELICAN BAY MUNICIPAL
SERVICE TAXING AND BENEFIT UNIT, BY AMENDING SECTION
FOUR, PURPOSE AND POWERS, TO CLARIFY THAT BEACH
RENOURISHMENT IS ONE OF THE PURPOSES OF THE UNIT;
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY;PROVIDING FOR
INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on May 28, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners (Board), adopted
Ordinance No.2002-27,which superseded,repealed,and consolidated prior ordinances relating
to the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit("Unit');and
WHEREAS, the Board subsequently amended Ordinance;No. 2002-27 by adopting
Ordinance No,2006-05,Ordinance No.2009-05,and Ordinance 2013-19;and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to further amend Ordinance No. 2002-27, as amended, in
order to clarify that beach renourishment is one of the purposes of the Unit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,that:
SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO SECTION FOUR OF ORDINANCE NO.2002-27,
AS AMENDED.
Section Four is hereby amended as follows:
SECTION FOUR: Purpose;powers.
The Unit is formed for the purpose of providing street lighting,water management,beach
renourishment, ambient noise management, extraordinary law enforcement service and
beautification,including but not limited to beautification of recreation facilities,sidewalk, street
and median areas, identification markers, the maintenance of conservation or preserve areas
including the restoration of the mangrove forest preserve arid to finance the landscaping
beautification of only that portion of U.S.41 from Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road in
the above-described taxing and benefit unit and to that end shall possess all the powers to do all
things reasonably necessary to provide such services. The Unit will be solely responsible for
advising the County on dredging and maintaining Clam Pass for the purpose of enhancing the
health of the affected mangrove forest,and will manage such activities for the County,
Words Underlined are added;Words Struckrough are deleted. •
Page I of 2
Agenda Item#7c
Page 3 of 9
SECTION TWO: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY.
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other
applicable law,the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction,such portion shall be deemed a
separate,distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion.
SECTION THREE: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES.
The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and
Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or
relettered to accomplish such,and the word"ordinance"may be changed to"section," "article,"
or any other appropriate word.
SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall be effective upon filing with the Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier
County,Florida,this 2,..rtklay ofOc .\=ey— ,2013.
ATTEST: ;; BOAa2ILOF OUNT COMMISSIONERS
DWIGI-� 'E;BRGIOt-,CIerkCOLLF C• TY,FLORIDA
\l;1 By:
yi •
By.i _, ll;
Cle0� GE• ' i. r- LER,ESQ.
Attest as •
lo.Chalim i •
CHA .t7V• AN
sig ature •
App t v ' •-;,wand legality:
Jefl're4A..Matzkow
County A twiny This ordinance filed with the
]]i Set etary of State'; Off e hC
02.1 day of ,
and acknowledgement o that
9
filin received this day
of A -
By
Words Underlined are added;Words Stfoek-Through are deleted.
Page 2 of 2
Agenda Item#7c
• •
Page 4 of 9
ATTACHMENT 2
July 7,2014
Gary McAlpin,Director
Coastal Zone Management
2800 N.Horseshoe Drive
Naples,FL 34104
Dear Gary:
At a recent meeting,you told me county funds could not be used for
renourishing portions of the Pelican Bay beach beyond a half-mile public entry
point—in this case the western terminus of Vanderbilt Beach Road.You said
the section from marker R-33 to Clam Pass would be the responsibility of
Pelican Bay.
Please be advised the Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD) will assume
responsibility for sand renourishment of that portion of the Pelican Bay beach.
Based on county surveys,the PBSD will,on an annual basis,designate which
sections within those boundaries should receive sand and will fund the
designated renourishment.
To that end,the PBSD Board of Directors passed the following resolution:
The Pelican Bay Services Division acknowledges its authority,as directed
by ordinance,to determine annually an acceptable level and disposition of
sand renourishment for the Pelican Bay beach for which it is responsible,
this renourishment to be consistent with county design standards and
available PBSD funds.
Please let the PBSD know when the'county is planning its annual
renourishment activities.We will coordinate with you any sand placement that
may be warranted on the sections of the Pelican Bay beach for we have
responsibility.
Agenda Item#7c
Page 5 of 9
Pelican Bay Services Division Board of Directors
Dave Trecker,Chairman
cc: PBSD Board of Directors
Neil Dorrill,Administrator
Collier County Board of Commissioners
Leo Ochs,County Manager
Jim Hoppensteadt,Pelican Bay Foundation President
Agenda Item#7c
Page 6 of 9
ATTACHMENT 3
State statute defines a public beach in terms of access to the public. All
beach is public below mean high water. Above mean high water, it is public
up to one-half mile of public access.
For Pelican Bay, that means the beach is "public" from Vanderbilt Beach
Road to between markers R-32/R-33. The county funds renourishment of
that portion of the beach. The PBSD is responsible for renourishing the
portion of the beach from R-32/R-33 to Clam Pass,just south of R-41.
In 2016, the PBSD funded renourishment, with about 9,000 CY of sand, of
an eroded section of the beach (R-34/R-35 to R-36/R-37) as part of an
overall county truck-haul project that included Vanderbilt Beach, Gulf Shore
and Naples beaches.
Surveys showed the beach at R-35, R-36 and R-37 gained an average of six
feet in width (2017).
Agenda Item#7c
Page 7 of 9
• • - r -,. . , -•-,i I, 0-`'''''—gf r -1-' .." ..':
- - ., • • ...„,,," . — .,,, A, t "".f• I
, 4 a 1 •'a ,
,._ '''. r. ....' -•,.....,.. 4 • 4.4 m 44' r,..., k
• .
• . . . . 4A . ..3'
: •1 '.. '--, t: ›'.... „- - -..."'*-- —--,..„,_•''..Ct.%-al
G . ' • '' ..," ',,' ' ON 0 11;A; -.7"-----.•
E %,R-30 '- • i. I , its 41-4 '
' ' Y5-.-= •••• .0 s a 1 -'
I . A i 1 ,el ,,oilifib
.• .. • 4,,;•.„•'! *O. m
-.. :„.
. ..3,..,.c.. ,,, i.„. ,,ie 111,70 q r•,,...{.
. . . . . .
I . , , s'114 1- -..• , 4. /.i.*r,P
'''•, 'tY '' 1 ' ''' \‘4 4' 9':-.1‘Et.4*''
•a;. ., , 07'•,,
4 . • -• ' '' 4-
. . t t„ •'V,' • -.6.,..'.,
• gob,' , . • -•
. .
093 .f 4'.' ell
• .
, ..
•0- , ,.
le,,e :4. I..6,
.
/ .
-; a' .. ,
. V .• , - .i.1 .',A .:.
t . • k V.si .-,4'1.
- .''.
• b ,-.:?
x . ',14 Rt33
. .
1.043 :- '1 :
it •
c. • • h
1 • ti -
,-14• •-•'' ..
-i-:''i-
• •
, .. r.•,,,,,,j
• •
• •
•
. I
.. . ' R=35 ki ?-, :-!•-4.‘, I
n t i
• , . , • a 11k,
. .,..
. , • -141 0.41 0 . 4P.
. •. . r,- g...a.„%..I(, .''
R-36 Lc*, ffitki • f'
•., 1, ' ",.*: '";-4. . . t a
Z t
. . •- 544„ .'c, ' , I
•. R-37 'N , , ..'
— '
. .
I
..1 k, '•".4 '
. . ..:a.3:e!. ' •
•
• • •:i.•.; 1 R-38 .,/,‘•-t:' -"......:7
C'.1;':'1:...4'.. . A / ,i, le,CI\
- f• 1. t. ,... 6\
•
s. 4 ...
OP ''••
• CIMI 14 1
•
. '.• j,,, ,
I,
1 ,‘
• 4*, ' .1,1'
• 1
• . • • - ---40 1,••
%,.) ' • I
i
, lk__.,-- • ,.
. •
,,,.
- ' -
• '0 s,
'
t , J ••••
• • 1,' • :, ,
•
• •• . tOX .b'' "
, - N.A.• .) '
•- ' •
*.• . ' / '( i... t .
• % ' ,...,„•,••'
,..'
.._ i: . '.--, 1
. , 1,
tl:ti v• •:NW.......!...........•it.•.'.,::,;•
,1,47,.....- 4 1.,.;'• .1•.4.4 74A : ,,. '.. .,. 4....:.1'
. , •!•-::•• •-•:-.', .4'',....4'4, , . ', Mit';17,01.' 1,•/,1
.'""....'".'-''. "' .,-otniasrosi I , A -i •4 41
'I. L1 1&MOORE
, -,..?? • .ENGINEER —
.I . f 1 I mum
/
. ....11411G 015 GU
0,,--r:t-ec.r.t,-&p41 APO tilt141111sta . . ), L..4P,....,,,, 1 - ,,....1
.. - lit.\
_ .,,..,... It
. ..p"...—j
Agenda Item#7c
ATTACHMENT 4— Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Sure 8 of 9
CONCLUSIONS •
The monitoring area from monuments R-17 to R-21 within Delnor-Wiggins State Park outside le
of
the project limits has been stablein
5a) and gain of overarison to previous rng 2 600xiods with a(2,670 Table 5b)for
average shoreline change (-3;Table ) nd volumetric
this most recent monitoring period. Although there was erosion from R-18 to R-21, monument
R-17 recovered from the previous monitoring sand. In spite of the recentd gaining 30 feet in vstabil atth 0'�onaat the north
ble 5a) and
over 4,800 cubic yards (4,850;Table 5b)
end of the park shoreline near Wiggins Pass, the remainder of the park beach has eroded since
the April 2013 survey losing an average of This ser m5ent of the ble torin)g 5ain are'atcould potentially be
h and almost 7,500
� cubic yards (-7,480;Table 5b) of sand. g Pass, and ongoing monitoring �s
renourished with a portion of the sand dredged from Wiggins
Lrecommended.
Vanderbilt Beach, nourished as part of the in the reach with an average twidth of 1 6ained the efeet
gn
Standard width for all monuments contained
(116;Table 5a). Since 2013 the project area shows accretion with volu etof theric
sand
almost 87,000 cubic yards (86,870;Table 5b) since 2013 and approximately
placed in 2013 and 2016 (86%;Table 8b) hasremained
Beach.within the project limits. Evaluation for
renourishment is not recommended for Van
Pelican Bay Beach, nourished as part of the 20 the monutruck umentsl e ctn the southern h, has an aif of the
beach
width (102;5a) over the Design Standard although
reach from R-34 to R-37 have widths approximately 10 feet less (87-96;Table 5a) than the
standard. The Pelican Bay project reach contains almost 50,000 cubic yards (49,250;Table 813)
of sand in excess of the April 2013 condition; of the 1 ditionallQO foot standarthe beaches d rth Although evaluation
and south of the
reach (from R-34 to R-37) have widths in excess
for renourishment is not recommended for Pelican Bal e Be dedach aor if the areas below the Design
tinued monitoring
is recommended to determine if renourishment
Standard are within normal ranges of variability.
Park Shore Beach, nourished as part of the 2016 truck haul project,
maintained the Design
Standard of 85 feet at all monuments in the project reach with he exc ptiios n of R-44 at 75 I feet
(75
(75;Tab1e 6a) at the north end of. this reach. The reach shows
013
post-construction survey containing over 66,000 cubic yards (66,740;Table 8b) of sand
li.
representing over 70% (68%;Table 8b) of the fill placed Che 0 a3 this time6 The and 201 . Evaluation
for
renourishment is not recommended for Park Shore Bea
is
1. currently pursuing permits to extend this beach fill segment further north improving the shoreline
stability at the north end of this reach.
Naples Beach, not nourished as part of the 20Pass south to monument R-60,project, is considered in two S influenced by the
eparate reaches.,. The northernmost reach ranges from Doctors effects of the inlet; and from approximately R-61 south, south of the immediate influence of the
to
inlet. Sand dredged from Doctors Passrrt area ofcan eNaptely be s BeaclhCen conjunction with d south of the tthe
address the erosion in the northernmosttting the
construction of erosion control structurNepr°lonuments R-59 south to R-9ects currently in the final rhaveswidths atrger
time of this most recent monitoring survey
-79
than the 100 foot Design Standard for Naples
fill taper) having wieach with the dths 2 feet cess than the
(located at the terminus point of the south
Design Standard. Although Naples Beach
contains
be ch exceedsRhe Design Standard bye
�` placed in 2013 and 2014,the average width of the
28
r.
I
Agenda Item#7c
Page 9(TT'
than 20 feet. Evaluation for renourishment is not recommended for Naples Beach although if
Doctors Pass were to be dredged this year in conjunction with construction of the erosion
control structures, then the beach in the vicinity of R-63, having a design width less than otf the
Design Standard, could be addressed with a portion of the sand dredged from the inlet with the
balance of the fill placed south of the south jetty if deemed necessary.
All of the four project areas for the Collier Beach Nourishment Project collectively show an
average beach width gain of 2 feet(+2;Table 8a) and a volumetric gain of approximately 20,000
cubic yards (20,430;Table 8b) in the most recent monitoring period. Since the preconstructiion
survey dated April 2013, the project beaches have retained an average gain of 12 feet in width
representing 60% (12/19;Table 8a) of the average gain derived from the 2013project, and
approximately 225,000 cubic yards of the 353,000 cubic yards (225,070 + 52,350 + 75,790) of
sand placed or 64%. This should be considered good performance and stability fora beach fill
project and placement of maintenance renourishment material is not recommended at this time.
•'.sem ',- �-., f ,.y..#. -�•- vis .,,....-.A.�'o-+ -.. -- ��� ...
.,. rr< rte: '!' .
Lowdermilk Park
Courtesy of the Naples Virtual Museum
29