Agenda 02/10/1998 R COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA
February 10, 1998
9:00 a.m.
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR
TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PR/OR TO
THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED.
REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST
BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY AD~TOR AT
LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC
PETITIONS".
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE.
LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO I:00 P.M.
1. INVOCATION - Father Joseph Spinelli - St. Elizabeth Seton Catholic Parish
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. January 15, 1998 - Emergency Meeting.
B. January 20, 1998 - Regular Meeting.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND SERV1CE AWARDS
A. PROCLAMATIONS
1) Proclamation proclaiming the week of February 9 - 14, 1998 aa Collier Harvest
Week. To be accepted by Bert Paradb and John Raker, Trustees of Collier
Harvest.
!
February 10, 1998
SERVICE AWARDS
I) Carol A. Somers - Library. 10
C. PRESENTATIONS
1) Recommendation to recolnJze Debrlh Pruton, Semior Planner with the Planminl
Seryices Depsrtment, Community Development sBd FJvJroamenbl
Division ts Employee ortbe Month for Febnmry 1998.
2) Presentation to Collier County Government Employees oa bebalfor the Ua#ed Way
of Collier County in appreciation of leadership aad support of the United Way or
Collier County Campaign 199'/,
6, APPROVAL OF CLERK'S REPORT
A, ANALYSIS OF CHANGF, S TO RESERVES FOR CONTINGENCT~-q-
7, PUBt,IC PETITIONS
8. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
.aL. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVXRONIVfENTAL SERVlC£S
tlilt ]) A opt. Resol..o..uthor'-'ol,be.eq..i.. by p.,.=, o. co--.---..o, of
Fee Simple Title interests and/or perpetual, non-exclusive, road rl~ht-of-way,
sidewalk, utility, drainale, maintenance and temporary construction interests by
easement for the construction of the four-ianioI Improvements for Immokalee
Road (C.R. 846) Project between I-'/5 and C.R. 951 CIE No.
C. PUBLIC SERVICES
13. SUPPORT SERVICES
! } Selection of the Newspaper for the Advertislnj of Delinquent Real Estate and
Personal Property Taxes (Continued from February 3, 1998).
E. COUNTY A13MINISTRATOR
F. AIRPORT AUTHORITY
9. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
10. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
A. Appointment of members to the Citizens Advisory Task Force,.
B. Appointment of members to the Peltcan Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee.
C. Appointment of members to the Collier County Code £nforcement Bonrd.
I 1. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS
2
February ! 0, 1998
PUBLIC COMMENT ON GENERAL TOPICS
PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE FI'~.ARD IMM]~DIATELY FOLLOVifING STAFF ITEMS
12. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS. nCC
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
B, ZONING AMENDMENTS
1) Petition PUD-97-12, William K Hoover of Hoover Planning Shoppe
representing Frank Clesen find Sons, Inc., requesting a rezone front 'E" Estates
to "PUD" Planned Unit Development for property located in the northwest
quadrant of the Pine Ridge Road (CR 196) and l-TS Interchange Activity
Center located on Tract 9Z, GoMen Gate Estates, Unit 35, Sec. 7, T49S, R2~F..,
cons/sting of approximately 4.33 acres.
C. OTHER
1) Approval of an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 97-79 to correct a
scrivener's error to the Pelican Marsh PUl) document resulting from a
transmittal to the Secretary of State ora document in which certain pages were
inadvertently omitted.
13. ~OARD OF ZONING APPEALS
A. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
1) Petition V-97-14, John Hobart representing First National Bank of Naples
requesting a 40 foot dimensional variance from the yard setback requirement of
fifty (50) feet for a structure located in a PUD zoning district for property
located in Pelican Bay PUD, further described as a portion of Parcel One,
Oakrnont Parkway Extension in Sec. 33, T49S, R.25E.
2) Petition SPA-97-1, R. Bruce Anderson, Esq., representing Daniel and Barbara
Hoover, owners of the property located at 2452 J & C Boulevard known as
Tea's Restaurant, requesting approval to share a total of 27 ofT-site parking
spaces located at 6401 Airport Road known as Hadinger Carpets located
approximately 260 feet from the applicant's property.
B. OTHER
1) Request for extension oftime for which an asphalt and concrete batch plant
facility may operate as a conditionally approved use in the "A" Rural
Agricuttural Zoning District for property hereinafter described in Collier
Count)', Florida.
2) Request for a second extension of Conditional Use CU-96-1 for a church in the
RSF-3 Zoning District for property described in Resolution 96=192 adopted on
April 9, 1996, pursuant to Section 2.'/.4 (Conditional Use Procedures) of the
LDC.
14. S'I'A FF'S COMML'NICATIONS
3
Febr'uaO' I0, 1998
1 ~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' COMMUNICATIONS
16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action
will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a
member of the Board, that item(a) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered
separately.
s
A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
I) Approval of Excavation Permit No. 59.632 "Creative Homes Excavation"
located in Section 1 i, T48S, R2'/E, bounded on the east and west by vacant lots
zoned 'Eatates", on the north by 14" Street NE, and on the aouth by a Collier
: County canal and easement.
2) Accept a quitclaim deed for Shellabarger Park in reference to a Community
Development Block Grant for Infrastructure improvements (97-DB-3K-09-21-
01.N03).
3) Approval for recording the final plat of Ulsland Walk, Phase One".
4) Apprrwal nfs Budget Amendment to appropriate funds to pay for professional
seN'ices in the development of the Interim Government Services Fees
Ordinance.
B. PUBIC WORKS
O I) Approve a Cooperative Agreement with the South Florida Water Management
District for the maintenance and operation of a replacement bridge at
Valewood Drive over the Cocohatchee Canal
2) Execute three (3) Quit Claim Deeds, in order to re-convey previous interests
obtained by Pine Air Lakes PUD.
3) Approve Supplemental Agreement with Hole, Montes and Associates, Inc. for
Immokalee Road Improvements, Project No. 69101; CIE 08.
4) Award a Contract for Profesaional Engineering Services for the South Naples
Community Park RFP 9'7-2745 - ProJect #80037.
C. PUBLIC SERVICES
1) Requesting direction to prepare an ordinance repealing Ordinance No, 93-2
that established the Public Health Unit Advisory Board.
2) Direct staff to draft an amended ordinance relating to beach and water and
vessel control.
D. SUPPORT SERVICES
1) Recommendation to Reject Proposals Received Under RFP #9%2760
E. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
4
February 10, 1998
1) Budget ame:zdme,,t report.
F. BOARD OF COUNTY COMbilSSION~RS
G. M]SCELLAN£OUS CORRESPONDI~NCI~
1) MISCELLANEOUS {Tt;{H$ TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS
H. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OIrFICI~RS
L COUNTY ATTORNEY
J. AIRPORT AUTHORITY
17. ADJOUR~
INOUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO ~ I~OARD'S AGI~NDA SHOULD BI~ MADI~
TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE AT 774-~383.
$
February 10, 1998
AGENDA CHAN~E~
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETING
FEBRUARY 10t 1998,
WITHDRAW: ITEM $(BXI) - ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
ACQUISITION OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
FOUR-LANING IMPROVEMENTS FOR IMMOKALEE ROAD BETWEEN 1-75 C.R.
951 CIE No. 08. (STAFF'S REQUEST).
CONTINUE: ITEM 16(1})(4) TO 2/17/98 MEETING: AWARD A CONTRACT FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE SOUTH NAPLES
COMMUNITY PARK RFP 97-2745 - Project #$0037. (STAFF'S REQUEST)
PR OCLAMA ?IO'N
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commtrsionert recognizes the goals of Collier Harvest, a
chapter of U.S.A. Harvest, in its efforts to,feed the hungry through volunteer
efforts and in k~'nd donations from local markets, restaurants, bakeries and
caterers; and
WHER. EAS, Collier County is fortunate to have numerous individuals and organizations who
give generously of thetr time and excess food, at no cost to the hungry of Collier
County, to support Collier Harvest; and
W'HERF_AS, the Board of County Commissions lends z'upport and encouragement to all
Collier County citizens interested in the community effort to eradicate hunger in
Collier Countu' and
WtlEILEAS, th,: Board of C~. ~rnmgtrlonzrs.~~ the p..ostttve effects of iU
.,
citizen's participation in Collier Harvest in hunger and
promoting ~ommunity ,
NO W THEREFORE, b~ it £rocla[med bY ~ of Collier
'} '~? "*'ff.':, t~, :',' ..',,' '~ ".':
County, Florida, that tl~ wee,~
DONE AND O RD ERE, D~T'~2]~ i "
· ~ '-' '-' " COr. i.~R COUNT~, FLORIDA ~' '-~ -'" ""
: '; ."; ' ';.~: ~ .;'~"" :::o o,e ·
· '. . . .'.. · ;,.... ,' '..~n,~.. _, -~.. :...,:.'. .... '" , r ' - :'
..... . · t .~'~;. ** · - ~ ..
.. :.. ?..-..- . ~a~" ."" .' ~'* ' ::' ".' .-
· 4'~, ',a,,,.l~ .... lr.[ ~, - . .~.:~
"'~2 '" .' .... : ' '
· :.~? . .. .-.°: .* . --
· ' ' ~' * /' .c' " ~ [' ' '
, ,:" . -' .' I:~._-
.. . ,, ...,.~.-.:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO RECOGNIZE DEBRAH PRESTON, AICP SENIOR
PLANNER IN THE PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DMSION AS EMPLOYEE OF
THE MONTH FOR FEBRUARY 1998.
~l~]Y,.~ff~: The "Employee of the Month" Program is designed to recogni~ exceptional
performance plus urdquely identifiable contributions which produce ~ignificant results for the
County.
CON$IDERAT~[~_~
Debrah Preston is a dedicated employee who is always ready to volunteer for new projects while
continuing to meet deadlines on assigned projects. Debrah's most recent projects include the
development o£thc Marco Island lViaster Plan~ the Immokalee Main Street Designation and the
Gateway Trianglc/Bayshore redevelopment effortz.
Debrah has initiated cost savings for the County by utilizing the Federal Vista (Volunteers in
Service To America) program to help staff the Immokalee Main Street program of which she
oversees. Through her direction, the Immokr, lee business owners have benefited with the
development of several training and organizational sessions. Debrah's recent involvement in the
Economic Development Council (EDC) Redevelopment Committee, is an extra effort on her part
to further redevelopment efforts in Immokalee and the Gateway/Bayshore redevelopment areas.
Debrah has volunteered countless hours to community projects including the Immokalee Paint
Your Heart Out, Habitat for Humanity, United Way, American Heart Association Walkathon and
organizing efforts for the American Planning Association.
Debrah's customer service skills are exceptional. She has earned the respect of her co-workers
for her job lcqowledge, skills and willingness to assist at all levels to achieve Departm~
objectives.
Without reservations, Debrah Preston was nominated and selected as Employee of the Month for
February 1998.
~PACT: "Employee of the Month" selectees receive a $50.00 cash award. Funds
for this award are available in the MSTD General Fund, Comprehensive Planning (I 11-138317).
A~Et,DA ITEM
".-s-de3-/
FEB
Pg. ,,/
.1
RECOMMENDATION: That Debrah Proton b~ r~.o~ as the "Employee of the Month"
for February 1998.
Louise ~,. ~°s
Adminismstive S~
APPROVED BY: ~~ ~ DA~:, 3'z'f!
Michelle E. Arnold
Assistant to the Coun~ Administrator .
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION BY GIFT, PURCHASE OR
CONDEMNATION OF FEE SIMPLE TITLE INTERESTS AND/OR PERPETUAL, NON-
EXCLUSI'v~, ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SIDEWALK, UTILITY, DRAINAGE,
,MAINTENANCE AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCT/ON INTERESTS BY EASEMENT FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOUR-LANING IMPROVEMENTS FOR IMMOKALEE
ROAD (C.R. 846) PROJECT BETWEEN 1-75 AND C.R. 951 CIE NO. 08.
~ To adopt a Resolution to acquire by gift, purchase or condemnation of fee simple title
interests and'or non-exclusive, perpetual road fight-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage, maintenance
and temporary construction interests by easement required to complete the four-laning roadway
improvements for Immokalee Road (C.R. 846) between 1-75 and C.R. 951, (hereinafter referred to as
"the Project").
CONSIDERATION; On October 28, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance
No. 97-55 therein establishing the 1997 (Seventh Annual) Capital Improvement Element of the
Growth Management Plan. The Transportation Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan was
adopted in Ordinance No. 97-62 for CIE No. 08.
On September 16, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 97-356
authorizing the County Staff to acquire by gift or purchase certain easements, and fee simple title to the
propcrty and property interests required and necessary for the four-laning roadway improvement of
Immokalee Road between 1-75 and C.R. 951.
Staff has reviewed alternative locations, environmental factors, cost variables, safety and welfare
considerations as they relate to the construction of the Project and the Board finds that the most feasible
location for the additional road right-of-way for the construction of the Project is being more
particularly described in Exhibit "A" of the attached Resolution.
c~J F_$fi_~ The fight-of-way acquisition cost estimate has just recently been updated to
reflect actual appraised values and all of the most recent design changes. Total acquisition costs are
estimated at 51,082,61 a, and includes all land, improvements, and severance damage pay-outs as well
as all overhead costs and expenses which may be incurred through condemnation and final judgment
expenses for the non-exclusive, perpetual easements referenced in Exhibit "A", required to complete
the four-laning roadway improvements for the Project.
FEB 1 0 1998
Page 2 - Imrnokalee Road Executive Summary
Funds are available FY 98 ir, the amount of $1,082,614 in:
Fund 331 - Road Impact Feed (District #1)
Cost Center: 163650 - Road Impac! Construction
Project: 69101 - Immokalee Road Project
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: A~ a Capital Improvement Element project, the
recommendation is consistent with the County's Growth Management Plan for CIE 008.
RF.,.COMMENDATION: Tha! the Board of County Commissioners:
(1) Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the acquisition by gift, purchase or condemnation the
fee simple title interests and/or non-exclusive, perpetual road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage,
maimenance and temporary construction interests by easement required to complete the fourolaning
roadway improvements for Im~okalee Road Project, between 1-75 and C.R. 951; and
(2) Authorize the Chain'nan to execute the attached Resolution.
Wilton Iverson, Senior Specialist
Real Property Management Department
Micah K. ~uoi, Project Manager
Offic~,.of Capital .P~'ojects Management
REVIEWED BY: / ~" ~~'~/~ ~'/~//..~
Adoifo A. G~zale~ P.E., D~r
Office of Ca ~ital Proj~t~ Management
APPROVED BY:~
~lsc~Ed 1 ~r, Administrator
Public Works Division
FEB I 0 1998
I RESOLUTION NO. 98-
2 A ~SO~ON A~O~ ~ ACQ~$1~ON OF ~ BY G~.
6 CONS~U~ON ~TS BY ~~ FOR ~ CONS~U~ON OF c ... ~--;~,,~.~
? T~ FO~-~G RO~WAY ~ROV~S FOR ~O~E RO~
8 (C.R. 846) PROJE~ BE~'~EEN I-?~ ~ C,~ 9tl, ~ NO, 08.
9 ~E~, ~ Bo~d ofCo~ ~i~ on ~lo~ 28, 1~7, ~opt~ ~ '.
10 No. 97.55 ~er~in ~tablis~ng ~e 1997 (S~ ~) C~i~ lmpmv~m~t El~t of~
I l Grow~ M~ag~m~nt Pl~ in ordo lo ~blish pfiofiti~ for ~e d~i~ ~uisition ~d "
12 construction of~ v~o~ capi~l ~pmv~enl pmj~. ~ Tr~mlion El~t of~ .
l 3 County's Compr~h~sive PI~ w~ ~opl~ in ~di~ No, 97~2; ~d
14 ~E~AS, ~ fo~-l~g ~prov~ to ~o~1~ ~ ~ I-7~ ~d C.~ 951 is . .'.
15 one of ~e capital improv~enl ~j~ts r~uir~ ~d~ ~ T~mlion El~menl of~
16 Co~ty'~ Compr~h,n~iv~ PI~; ~ ,
17 ~'HE~AS, ~e Bo~d of Co~ty Cotillon,a, on S~m~r 16, 1~7,
18 Rt~olution No. 97-~56 au~ohzing ~ Courtly Staffto ~quir~ by 8iff or pureh~ e~n .....
19 c~cmcnls ~or fee simple rifle to ~e prop~y ~d pm~ny interes~ rcquired ~d n~ ,' :
20 for thc Co~-I~ing to.way impmv~ ofl~l~ ~ ~lw~n I-7~ ~ C.R. 951; ~ ..~
21 WH~AS, the I~adon for co~ction of~ pro~ impmv~en~ ~ be~ fix~ by
.. '
22 sure>' md is collectively represemed by ~e ]eg~ de~dpfio~ ~mp~sing E~bil "A" al~h~
23 hereto ~d in~raled h~ein.
· . ~. -K.
24 W~AS, a~ ~id~ation of ~e avml~ilily of~t~e mul~ a~ ]~fio~, ~e
25 comp~alive cosls ofproj~l allemalives, v~o~ imp~ u~ ~ ~vim~ long ~ge
26 piing option, md public uf~y co~id~tio~ ~e Bo~ d~ir~ lo ex~i~ i~ fi~l
27 condeam prop~y forpublic p~s~, · .... :?.~
2 ~ NOW, ~E~FO~, BE IT ~SOL~D BY ~E BO~ OF CO~
29 CO~ISSIONE~ OF COLLIER CO~, FLO~ ~ i~ ~ ~m det~ed by
~.~'.
order m pmt~t
13 improvements is collectively r~rcscntcd by
14 a~chcd hereto ~d ~co~rat~ h~cin ....
15 ~D IT IS F~THER ~OLVED that in order to ~stmct ~ proj~t m d~i~ it is :
16 ncces~ for the Bo~d to acquire th~ v~ous real pm~y int~ d~fi~ E~bit "A" to "~
· ' 17 wit: fcc simple title intcres~ ~/or ~ual, ~n~cl~iv~ m~ fi~t~f-way, sid~
19 ~ND IT IS F~THER ~OLVED ~ ali pr~ ~1 ~ put to public p~.
20 ~ IT IS F~THER ~OLV~
21 i~ediatcly acquire by gi~, purc~c or ~nd~tion ~ ~r~ce wi~ ~c provisio~ of
22 Chapters 73, 74 ~d 127, Fio6da S~tut~ ~g ~ve.~[~ ~ ~y ~ ~ ..j,
24 ~ IT IS F~THER ~SOLVED
25 to bc ~ui~ md ~cfore it will ~t ~ n~ to r~vc my mobile ~mes flora ~c "
27 ~s Resolution adopted on ~s
2'8 second ~d majority vote. .
29
Pa~ 2
I BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ;"" ': :;;'":
· ... .
2 ATTEST: : ' ......
·
: 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By:. /;,~:../~".:~-~.?.:~-,
:?,:.'.;. r::?~
4 BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN
.~ .~~ 6 ~ i'; ' '::"':"~'~':"~';
7 Approvod ~ ~o form md [ :".'.,',:"~'.~w'
.':
8 legal ~ufficiency: .
· ..: .,.. '~..
9 .. ,A./~_..-- :...,;...~?~ ~--'..?.
......
:,. 11 Assist,xnt County Attorney "
12 :.. .. ::..
13 ~"
14 :.'. ' "":
·..~.: :.;. :..:
:.-.?..
C, L. '
' ,.;....
.. ':
FEB 1 0 1998
OFFIC£ 0~' CAPITAL PROJECTS
3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA
(941) 774-8192
~ . PROJECT NO- R ~ 1 n ~
',. '* PROJECT PARCEL NO.
'": ';" '' '' i TAX PARCEL NO,&1930920(~02
· : SKETCH OF' LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOT A SU
~' ''
L£OAL DESCRmT1ON
~A~ 2n OF ~ ~AT ~RE~, ~EN OA~S E~A~, ~ ~. ~ RE~D~
PAR~ 101
'.'.' .. OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
.'!i',:.;:i.,.: 'i':: '! 3301 EAST TAMIAMI (941)TRAIL 774--8192NAPLES' FLORIDA 34112
.~' ':". ;
..-',-..... PROd£CT NO 69101 ,:.
..... :* ' .... PROdE:CT PARCEL NO,
.~,:*,' '*~*:. * '* TAX PARCL'L NO, &19'30920002
.'.* ".:? . SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVE'.'O
·
' : · temporlr! conotruct&ofl eolement
: ..... ::
:. ..,: "
LEGAL DESCRI~ON
',..'. '-' ' Tt-fE SOUTH FIVE (S') FEET OF THE NORTH FTF~' F~VE ($5') FEET OF TIlE
,~' %rEsT 200 FEET OF THE EAST 250 FEET OF TRACT 20 OF
THE
PLAT
THEREOF,
· .. GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AS RECORDED iN PLA'I BOOK ?, PAGE 96, OF THE
'i,'..; .... '. '.. :" PLq3LIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY', FLORIDA. '
CONq'AR',qNG 1000 SOUARE FFET OR 0,02:3 ACRES MORE OR LESS..
i '
.: ":..'.'::'. ~ ..
';:' "*'.'.' ' .. ,1 DATE-
· .~~(.;i.:.:..[(. :'.;~ :,j or,cE or e..APrtAL Pr~OJECTS
.;,.~'~:...-.?..,~.,;. ~.:::. ; COLU£R COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX
;,....;,~.:-,.-.,... ~: ..... ,~01 TAMIAM~...'II~AIt, NAP[,~$, rl,ORIDA 541 FEB
'.',';'. .~.' ~'.; ~ " . O*.AW~ I~; c-[e~ro ~';
I f~-.~/: ~)~t£; ~' 8,~. NO.:
'~:i/,:: "' ,' SHEET ~ :)F~., "/"'..
OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
-.' (941)
.:... , : 774-8192
· " .~ PROJECT NO.
· --'.-.,~ ....... PROJECT PARCEL NO.
TAX PARCEL NO, &19309f~090&
:. . LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVE~
;'i' fee ateple tttle"
':i L~GAL D£SCRTPTION '
~'...'.'" 'i. .. . ..· T'FrE NORTH THi~TY EIGHT (31,) FEET OF TRE WE$T 22.~ OI lrELITOFTH~ ~
.! :. . .'- . . 30001 ~.~L~r,AND'TH~SOUTHFi~.-jy(52,)FEETOFTi,~NOltTl, lNiN,E-ry
· :. (~Y)FEET OF ~ EAST FORTY (40)'I~ET OF ~ wEs'r I',l{N~l ~' (~
':: ...( ~ OF TRACT 21 OFTH~ PLAT ~OF, OOLDI~q' GATE ESTATES, UNIT 9'/, AS ..
· i RECORDED rN PLAT BOOK ?, PAOE ~ OF THE PUBLIC R~CORD$ OF
:. ~: ~ ,:' J
~... , ...', . ,'...,; .: ..
3301 E TAM1AMI TRAIL NAPL~. FLORIDA 3414~ '"-- ,
,.: .. .. OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS .
'.- ; ', .'. ": 3,301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL HAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
~ .~.:":.~. ·
· :' :' " (941) 774-8192
~ . PEOJECl' NO 69101
i"~
; , ' PROJECT PARC~ NO.
:~.. ;.-.' ~ . .: ?,~X PARC~ NO. ,~o'~no~,nnn/,
~::~ '<:): ..... : I-[GAL DE$CRI~DON (NOT 'A SU~-'~_ ... ..
25.,,. ~ ..' ..
.'.. ',:..'.,.~, . ... stdevalk, dratnal~ ~t~lt~y'. I maintenance easement "..
'{': :":'" .... L£GAL
.. ....
': .TL'~ ' /.'
....-;,.. ,_..
,-::-,: ....:': .
TRE soLrTH TWELVE (12~ FEET O1: TI~E NORTH FIFTy (50~ FEET OF THE WEST , .
-5;.-'.':. :'. ... ' 185o1FEETOFTH~EAST260.01 ~r4:iOFTRACTI] OFTI~PLAT~, ',"i"
... r-LOPJDA. S~'D DESCRrBED TRACT CONTAfNTNG 0 ~51 ACRE (2220 SQUARE .
FEET). N4ORE OR LESS. ·
· : · ' ' PARCEL 802 ,'
~.
.. :..=....: ,.
.'~.:. ' ' "-'-. '~" · L':
.~i ?=',.:." '.~:;:.i~L':..;~: .:: .:; .: ...
i[",~'C; '!;.'' '.ii ~'J
:."." .:"]:.:'7:' ', ".' :" ....
'.~,'..../':~.:-,' '..;7. :, :}! 1
~' .,,...... ., : .
:.."'...'.;'d '.']-'-:: ,;
~:' . ':'.':i' ~'..'..':
~';...{ ',:. · ..q, .;
~. ,,orr=ss~o.,,. t.~ su,v~. ~o~ FElt
. C,9LtlER COUNTY OOVZ"RNMF. NT COMPLEX II~.
-.. 5.f01 K TAMIAMI TRAIt. NAPLES. FLORIDA ,,%¢.11.
OP ICff OP CAPITAL
" ' 3301 ~T TAUI~I T~IL N~, ~ORIDA 34112
.. ~' (041) 774-8192
}
.... ~' PR~ P~C~ NO. ~n~
...." '"~ ' ': T~ P~ ~. ~1931000002
;'~ -.....: .' .,:
~''""" LEGAL DESCRIP~ON (NOT A SU~
fee. simple title
~.. . . ......[ ..'~;
:5':: . .',. ~.-'.:' · ~
- "......,, : ·
': .' E. XHXBZ? "A~
, OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
:-.:.,.' 3301 EAST TAMIAIvll TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
-: PROJECT PARCEl. NO. FIn'~ ,
'~' ' TAX PARCE/. NO,_ /I1931000002
'~;". *"" t_EG^L OE$CRIP'T~ON (NOT ^ SU~
· ~,.'. ,'. sidevelk, drainsSe, utilit?
...... LEG^I. DE$CR]FT1ON
,4,5 p.E CORDE. D rN PI.AT BOOK '/, PAGE 9,6, OF THE I~JB[.IC RECORDS OF
'~ COLt. rE~ COUNTY, FI. OIUD^ SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CORTAI~II'NO 0,021 ACRE '
~ (990 SQUARE FEET), MORE OP. LESS. .-
PARCEL SO2A * .' .'
":.' ' :.' omc~ O~ CAPffAI. pRoJic'rs I
' ! COLLIER COtJNTY GOV~NM~ COMPt. EX
, :' ' 3301 ~ ?A~41 TRAIL NAPt. ES, IrLORtDA
', OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS .
· .' ': TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,34112
~:'~,, , ~ ~';.. ,..,. i.:. 3301 EAST TAMIAMI (941) 774-8192
.,~,!;.!.. . . ..: PROJ£CT NO, RqlO1 :..
~ .. PR~E~ P~C~ NO. 103
.? .... '"';.~ T~ P~C~ NO. ~1~O~000~ .- :'
':':"'"'~' :-~ ': SK~CH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SU~
fee m~mple t~le
: .' '.~ ~OAL ~S~
.. ::: ESTA~S, ~IT 97, AS REC~D~ ~ ~T ~ 7, PA~ ~, ~ ~ ~LIC ~DS
· :, ,.; .';~, , '.'.; :
.... ~ ' '/ ' '" PAR~ 103
(... ,:,.;.'~....' ~,..~:.~ :.';. '.
.:~,.'~ '.r.., ,... .
:';.-......~.' . : .z ,.~
'<'..~'~:~. · X.:' ' ''
· ~.~ .. .
.:. · ~ ".'...2.? .}
' .~ '. '" .V'~ '
,? ,.~ ~ . ., }:: ~' . '..
., ~':...~/ ,,.,~ . "..~: ::.% .
.... ;; '.. ; .: :
...: ...: .-~.~ '
. ~. %<. '~ ..
. ... ..:..~,
' ..;--
· . :..~"..7: ;:{..~.~ .. "
...;..., ...., ; C¢~E R. RICHMOND
P~F[SSlON~ ~ND SU~OR ~2406 ~, '
;': ": " 3301 E TAMIAMI TRAI~ N~PLES~ FLORIDA 341 2 '
'"' ....
:: . HE~ .
~ 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRNL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
.~.-';) ..'~..? ' .. (941) 774-8192
'~.. 'v * PROJECT NO, 69101 .
· ;:, .,....
~ ';':';*' PROJECT PARCEL NO. 80~1 ·
· :.--~.: .~,. -
".; ;":*' 'TAX PARCELNO._ ~19310&000/,,
..,.-?.,~,;% :
..~,.: ' SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVE'~
, ~..',./: .' .... ,
~,.*'~'-~;.'~.' ":'~:i'.~ sidewalk, drainase, utility & mainte~ance easement
.4~:.: ~ ', .....:; ..
~':;, ;,....,.. · ....
:.;~:.::i~ v ~:
~., '- ,~" LEGAL DESCR/PTION ...,
~ SOU'~ TW~VE (12') FEET OF ~ NORTH FIFTY (~') Pt:cT OF TI~CT 2 2 (~ T1TE
THEREOF, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES. U'N1T 97, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS O~
.- .... CCYUWTY, FLO~/~ .
:"; ;.:"'.. CONTArNTNG 396a SQUARE FEET OR 0.0~ I ACRES MOLE OR LESS. · ...
.. ' .' .... .: .'i PARCEL 103
~...~ ~.:-
., . '.'_~,.~ .. :. ' .
"' i ';~''': ";:
: ....'. . ...~... ~ :"
., .:. · ~..:.,.. ; '., · . .
. . . ~ ~, . ..
~' ~?'. '!-' ''i:: ~'" '.
: ....
· . :~ .:...'.. ;.;..'
;'.;:' ,. ..,..: .,"
:..: ?..'.
· ~. .":~'.::~;: ·
7. '..: .. ~
::."~ '. ' ".". ;'.
co.u. cou.w J F B
:' '"" 330 TAMIAMI TRAIL k'APL~S, ~ORIOA 3411 .
' ·" OFFIC£ CAPITAL PROJ TCT$
,,, '~ 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 3411~2 ':
Y," (941) 774-8192
...... - PROJECT NO- ~c~ nl
,, .: .. PROJECT PARCEL NO.
· '.:".:: . TAX PARCEL NO..
::":.. ... ' ...SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY~
· :..,~ :,.. !."::. ,
,~. ,-,:,' ~: ;.~:.:',~,,,,, :~ I,EGAL DESCRII~TION
"...: c'L'::. -, ~ :r ' ..
:~ .,' ,; ,.: ,~, ,; . .--, T'HE NORTH TI~IR'I'y EIGRT (3R') :
.... ,. ;..., ..... ~,ESTATES. 1JI~T 97. FEET OF TRACT ~O OF ~ PLAT THEREOF. GOLDEN OATE ~.-'
· AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK ?. PAGE 96. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF .....
: . : ....... . COLLFER COUNTY. FLORIDA, ~:~
·:" ::'."~" i""i;",'
-';: . .' .., CON-TATN2NG 12.$40 SQUARE FEET OR 0.21I~ ACR£S MORE OR L~. !.'~'
:, . . ,.,~ PARCEL IO4 ,'
· ~..,.' ~;','~ ,.
· ~. ! . ~' .
.' · .i."' · t~. "~, .~'
· .~ :. '
..." $ N ~OR 1~2406
'' OFFICE OF CAP~ PROJECTS
,,. 5301 E TAMIAMI TRAII~ NAPLE7,~ FLORIDA 5411
:.! , DR~WN BY: C~'(CI~[D BY: $C's4'[= DAIE ILl NO.' "
· ; 3301 ~ST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
.. ,.;~... ·
· .'~.';>'";' :' ~ ". T~ P~C~ NO, ~3933280008 " ',
~.~..:'.:~-'. :: .. SK~CH OF LEGAL DESCRIP~ON (NOT A SU~
~,.'~.,?>-. ;,'..,? sldevalk, dratnale, 'uCil~7 &
{.' :,'..>;..:.;. . .~ ~ .. ~ .' ,
.~..', ,,;'.,.. ·,
' ~O~ D~]~ "
. P~ ~
~ ,
· 4' ~*$': :;.." ': .... ~ .* *' ..
',,,'.'..' ~.-.,-x . .~ *' '~ ': '
~ · . · ,;~
: .: .... ~..
.~:~, . ..*.:. ~ . :*
COLLIER COUNW G~RNME~ COMP~ FEB i 1 1998
33Ol [ TAMIAMI TRAIL NAP~ES~ ~0RIDA 3411~
OFPICE CAPITAL PROJECTS
......:.. 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112
..~: (941) 774-8192 .
· :.." PROJECT NO. 6~lnl '
i.'..' :.-..:; PROJeCT PARCEL NO. lO*~ . '
~:.~: ,?....:;......TAX PARCEL NO. ~tg;~:~320007
· ... SK~'rCH OF' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY)
-.,..~'. , ,;-. ~.,,/.: fee IJ. mp].e t. iCle .'
;- -' .'
; . p-.. ., ,
~.;., i';" ' ; - ·
': i~'..:!.. "i ] LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' . :. i;.
,? '..,~,,.'-~'~:?'--..i~'. .i i .... '
THE NORTH 'FIURTY EIGHT (38') FEET OF TRACT 5 ! OF THE PLAT THEREOF, : : :. -
- ' GOLDEN GA fE ESTATES, UNIT 97, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 96, . . ..
'~' ~ OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. .. ..'"
· ::. -~,. ,.,,.,. .., ~'...~:-,....
~'. ' '":: ";; CONTAfNTNG 12, $40 SQUARE FEET OP, 0.288ACR. ES MORE OR LESS. :.. .,
· ,,..:. i.. ';. -;..'.~.'... j
.... .:.
, ~.. ~ ,. ..' .
: - : ..,.- ..( .
· . . '.~.. ~ ..... z ;
! .. i ', '..; ,' ." '~ '~' ':.'-'
~l-a4~l,~'-'i . .. :.' . ,~,
..::... '?.,' i ;-
:..: ... ~:,".-. ?~.- .~
.; · ~. ;',,:...,~.
· ', ,~ ,..; ~:;- ...' .'~ '! -: .
:.~ ', ;/: .. ' i/. .,
· "· · ' DATE: --.
'~ '"":: " PEOF'ESSIONAL I. AND S~R llr2406 II0o_
',"...':!.~-.~ -.'. ·/.! orncc or c~Prt^~
., ~ ~-.,,';: .,,~.,..
. ..>: =;::~. COLLIER COUNI~f COVKRNMKNT COIdPLEX
='~:'"'!~'::" I SHEET ...,~-
· : 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
~ " (941) 774-8192 :'
~.L: .~': ...,. :,~. ·
.:,,~,......" .. :.' PR~E~ NO- ~o~qi ,'.~
· ~.,¥ :.' ~. -.
,,- .... t~ P~C~ NO. 4]933320007
,,,,, . ..... SK~CH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION _NOT A SU --_' --, "
:.:... .-: :
~"... '-":' ' atdevalk, dratnlle, ut~Ztty & maintenance easement
~ .... ?:".-.:? -:...~
~ ~ ~L~ (]2') ~~ ~ ~ (~') ~ ~ ~I ~ ~T
~RE~, C~DEN GA~ ESTAte, ~ ~, ~ ~ ~LIC RE~DS ~ ~
. . '.' ARE~O.~I A~M~E~ )' ~"~ .'."
~ CO~A~G 3~ ~ ~. i..- ~ .'~.'
_. . ~': - .; - . .-
.': ..:.~ PA~ ~ ..
,. ......-, . ,.; L.
. ~;' .: ,. -.,
. ,:~,.' ..'.~...,
':~', ' OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
.'.:::. : 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
(941) 774-8192
.. -, ~5 ·
;V';,: < ;:'." . :'.: ~ ~~
': COLLIEE C~, ~ID~ : ' ' ~ 'J.
CO~AI~G 12, ~40 S~ARE ~ ~ 0.2X~ A~ES M~E ~ L~S.
- ,. -.~.-. =....~ · . .
:: :. ,;..'...:,..'..'::';. ~ ' . ..
Pnorcss~ou~ ~D S~R ~4oe
..~ ..... :'...7 ' · SHE~ x )F~. I '
~i~.~...'.i OI~FICE OlW CAPITAL PROJECTS
'- :.' 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA ,34112
: (941) 774-8192
· ~-.,.:,...." ":"' ~.~: ' .SK~CH OF LEGAL. DESCRI~ON (NOT A SU~
· . .. : .',' ~E~.~GA~E~A~S.~.~~ICRE~~ · .*' · .'
~:.~ .
.. ~..~ . , .. ~.:
- pROFESSION~ ~D S~R ~2406 ~.~
' OFFICE OF ~
· "'" 3301 TAMI~I TRA~ NAPL~s,COMPL~oRIDA 34112 FEB I ~ 1998
....... :., SHE~ - ~. ._.
..:., OFFICE OP CAPITAL PROJECTS
".':.'" 3301 EAST TAblIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
· (941) 774-8192
i ":" :""'~'~ PRO~c'r ~0.. 6~1Ol :
...; ..,...: :.. '/.. , ,'.
:::..... :? . .,..- ..; .: PROJECT PARCEL NO. ]07
· ';"'-;' ~" '"': TAX PARCEL NO. /,]~3&g&O000 "
· ~. . :.:.,!~
:".::, ;.,,' -., · :
"~) ~.').......:
.,~-..;~.:~:....':; SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION ('NOT A SURVEY)
~,:.:'.":'i:;::' .'"? fee simple title ~.:.. -..
{ .... ',' "'?.~-' .': '.: :5 '
· :/...." ;,.L'=. ': 'i " .[. '
+: .'~,",, . '..,i · · ' '".
.~.' :..:' '.':'."! .. . L.' .......-..-
.:. ; .....": . ,":.
'
· .':,'.':"~".. ': :... :.... ~.~j.'
'; ; TI'rE NORTH THTRTY ETGHTOS')FELrl'OFTRACT?I OFTHE Pf. ATTI, IEREOF, ~ i. · .'"'(:",/'. '.,.
· ., ' <" ': ~ RECORDS OF COLLIER L~, FLORrDA. ~ .
· ;' ,, ','. '"i .' .-: CONTA~G 12. ~I0 ~.[ARE F~'ET OR 0.2~1! AL"~E~ ~ O~ LE~, :: ""' '" '
.. . ,..:.;5-~C.- · .-::' .:?
:.; ...i '' '
.. PARC1-=1. 1(~7
~ .' :.: ~-'.~...:'.
'......:..::.' :., ,.
;,'~ ~ ,- · ',,.
. ..~ :. '..:~ - f .......... '-."
.... · "..:' .'" '.C"~.: ~ :;.i ~, **..
,.' : :,~.,', .:..';
o - .., . :'.'; . .
'1
: -: ,-.:;i.r ..... :'" :: ' i':: :' ·
:; .~:~'.'--' , . :..
·' . ~ , RICHMOND
'- _P,ROEE,.SS_'_ON_AL LAND SURV~R 12406 I '"-
~:~::"""?: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX ...... I FE '
uP~'~CL OF CAPITAL PROJECTS I ----
":':":' 3301 ~ TAMIALll TRAIt~ NAPLES. FLORIDA_34112 I '~' I 'O '1998
· OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 :
· / .. : ! PROJECT NO, , '
.~ .- ..... ; PROJECT PARCEL NO. 807
:, :. . : .: TAX PARCEL NO. Alg3A960000 .
..:! SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY)
...: sidewalk, drainale, utility & m~intenance easement .t ..<~ ...
' "'" .'..' ' .. 'i 'P.'E $OLr','H TWELVE (I2'} FEET OF THE NORTH FIFTY (fO') ~.~:~ ¥ OF TRACT ?! OF THE PLAT :., .....
... :.. '} .' : THEREOF, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, U'NIT 9'/, OF THE PLI~LIC RECC~DS OF COU. IER : '..
:' · .. ' *..t CONTAINTNG 3960 SQUARE FEET OR 0.091 ACRES MORE OR LE~$. .
....... ~. ~..,..., ~;' ..'
: 6.~E ~f~. RICHMOND '
...... :..,'. ~ COLLIER COUNI~' GOVERNMENT COMPLEX
':"': · 5501 E TAMI^MI ~RAIL NAPLES~ FLORIDA ~4112
:: . OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJ~'CT$ ' .·.
:,':' : i:.' ,3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA ,34112
'::':':' '.' i." :: (941) 774-8192
~, .:.' ,. ~,'~, ~., .:,
Pr~oJ£CT NO 6qlol :"" ' "
"3:.X"-' "' :~ .... '':.
· ~.'.,?.'. ;.'.' . .' .::;~ ~ .., ...
~ ,..,...: ~, .....,.., . ~ '.'.'.' .g.~' .~ ..
· ~'. :.i~. '.': ,'~.:'..':....":'.'
"~ '"" ' ;:il ~': :'"' '"'"
;.'t GATE. EgTATE$, LWIT r~7, AS RECORDED iN PLAT BOOK ?, PAGE ~6, O~ TH~ PUBLIC
'' PffOF£SSIONAL URVEYOR 112406 ~
· .? OFFICE OF CAPITAL Pr~OJECTS ,-.. :
· . :...' ·
.... ------------'~°~ "?"~"^~" ?""' .~. s ~ ~ 1998
O£1 ICP, Ol CAPITAL PROJIFCT$
· "' .3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,34112
,;,"' ,, ", (9~1) 774-8192
": "': '"'" PR~E~ NO. 69101 ~" "
' '" ' '": PR~ p~ NO. 808
- .' SK~CH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOT A SUR--
' : ".:~' atdevalk, drainage ,' ;'
~",:-.: ,,. ,..,. , j
'..: "."' .::'~.'~., '~.'.:. i "':" ~<:' '''~: ~ ':'
:. 5...,.: ........_..~ ~O~~ $....
"': ~' ~ "?"~ ' ". ~ ~E~, ~ QA~ ~A~, ~ ~, ~ ~C RE~ ~ ~ ~'" '
,'.~ ~, ~ ...~-,'.. ;.:~
..... · CO~A~G 3~ S~ARE ~ ~ 0.~1 A~ES M~ ~ ~S.
-,. .~
~ COMPLEX
: D~a,~,,~ BT: CII[CKEO BT; SC.~L[: r~l£: tK£ NO.: "'
",, .~.., . i."~ O]~J~IC~, O]~ CAPITAL PROJI?CT$
" .... "~" ':'! 3301 EAST TA~IA~I TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 .
''- ' (941) 774-8192 =.....
" ',~ .'t ~ '..,~
~.;, ,; , ..... .
v;):.:.,,' :.. ..... ~ T~ PARC~ NO., ~J935~80009 ~:.' ..:..' .:'-'
:;, ;..:--.. ..:..., ~ ~ = ,...-*.
F..~;' ."::~' ~ . (':..~ : . : , '
'~' ~:~: ,:
'"" '"~ '" '::~" SK~CH OF LECAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SU~
.~.''. ~ ;', ; '.';';~ ~,~ ~:~-...,. ; ',
~,, '4, ,' i, - · y,~;]~.~ . .
.... ?. ..... i ~: ~ .~. '
.' ;~
. . . ........~: ~ .,:~ .....
· .: :' · ...... ~'.' ~AR~ ~
· ,: ..; ~.. :.~.~,.~ :¥ ~
.. ~.: ,".:,"~:k~?,...,.~ .'
. . .....~ i[
.. : ..... . / '....:,.;; ~; ; -:~'
P~OFESSlONAL ~ND SUeR J2408
"
~o, ~ ~.,.~, T.~,~ ..PLUS, ~O.,D~ 3~,,2 FEB I0 1998
I .... i
'? 'O ~:~ OFFICE' OIP CAPITAL PROJECTS
1. ' 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES,. FLORIDA 34112 ~ .
,,'. (941) 774-8192 : '
~ ~,'?...: ..'~- ,
~FESSIONAL ~D S~R ~2406
· *'. co~u[, cou~ c~,,,~ cou,~ FEB I 0 1998
5501 ~ TAMIAM~.TRN~ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
SHE~ ~
;....,,, :?: ,,.,. 3301 EAST TAblI^MI TR^IL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34.112
· :.,,~, ..... ."'.:,.S,t (941 ) 774-8192 ~..
· ~ · .:,.'.' ;;'.
r'l~oa£c'r I~o. ~gzol ';':~!~" -'~i,~ '"
TAX PARCEL NO,_&lgJ7960007 ·
.~'i':~i !.':. ~ .
SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION ('NOT A SURVE~ "'i' "'
· ,. :;...'.;~,./.
'.'' .' ;'~,',':,; ~ ;;i
· :...:': ,.. :~..-~: ;:~,*,~ ~;;: LEGAL DESCRIPTION .. -~"
~.... .:'.~,:...:.. ,
GATE ESTATES, U'NTT 9'/, AS RECORDED I~1 Pt,AT BOO~ 7, PAGE ¢6, OF THE PUBLI'C
' ,*' RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
~" .~ ~-"/ L'i :..-. *,i -:..
· **'.'.?'!,'::*'.>,:'; COI'$TArNING I 2, 54n S(~JARE FEET OR 0.21U~ ACRES MORE OR LES$. !,. ;: . .
· ;.; .:....,...'./: ,, .~ · ..
· ,. -..... '.-.', !:
' ·" PITOF£SS~ONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2408 I~.,.__ x~ ·
· . co,ut, cou cou. FEB
OPPICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
':i 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
'· (941) 774-8192 ~":';:'""'
- :,. · ,..? . ..,,.-. . ·~'. ~' '":;.. '~ . .... '. · , ....t~,;'
~' ,.: .- , ~ · .
.. -..:".'."..." L '; :', .-
.,... :: ..... , ~.:.;.i.:~ . :"
.... ' ............... PROJ£CT NO. 69101 -'
· -:'.!,'....';;.'.:.:,.;: ~: -' .
.':_. L,..'--' ,.! ~';;~' :'!. :';'. ....
·: :'f.:':::,'..i':;.~ :?'~ ;.. r'noJE¢l' PAr{CEL NO. '/~ n ;'!i';.ii' .'.'"
~.'~""'~-;-" :. :; ~ TAX PARCEL NO.. &I~37960007 -' · ·
· I'::;'~ .:"-'
· ' ~'. ....... '~"" "~: SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVE~ ~':"': ':
!,' ~.',.'.~ ::W!-'.':..': ~.,.~L:,." ' ':
~'h.,*~,,.,,. '.,~';, tem~o~i~ ¢onlt£~¢t~o~ eaIeIent '- "
· {'.'<..~.4' ~;~ .;'.";F'; ~" ': . .".
~,~'./~ >.:'~'- ~. . :. ..
-;:':, '. ~.',;,./..:; ·
.:~..-.:.,,~--;:- ..... · .... ,'
· 'G ,' 'i,:',;. ":"-..":" "... ·
.: .... ,~ - ~'.. ;...:
· i' i..i.. .~; .... LEGAL DF.~CRIPTION -' '
· ~.., .. :.~.,.
.;:;.:, >'.4'i;::' ." ': ' ",,
CONT^rNTNO:~,I]33 SQI./AnE FEETOI13.G~ ACRES MOItBORLF~&
..i', '":' '
/
___ 'SS ON^L LAND S~OR ~2408
OFFICr OF CAPITAL PR~
~,.o~,.,.~',?;' .~ 3301 ~ST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPL[S, FLORIDA 34112
LEGAL DESCRIPTION :NOT A SU--_ -
.' . .." a[devalk drainale, uttlit~ ~ aaintenance eaaeaent :"
,~., . , , ,-(~ , .' .. .
,:,:i~,:.:..::,: (941) ?74-8192 ·
'$"¥~;!.~:.'.'~';:i .!~'.."
..~,'~..'. ~..i ~'..' ,'.~
'7 ;'? -.': '.."::<~ ~ ·
~ . . ~,?~' .. ~,~.
~,~.,~ :.,%. ~K~CH OF LEGAL DESCRIP~ON NOT A SU
N:~..';$~.~.p ;~ :. ~:: .. , .... ,.
· ,,~,, ~N, i~$~.~,. ~...; .";
. '~;.:~.. ~:.,:..:.:;:.:' ~ .' . ~....
. ....... ~:.~..:.. ~ x .
;'...- .,, ..;
. ;;';~'." .... ,.
.- CO~A~G ~,~ ~QUA~E ~ ~ ~ ~E ~.
~.'..~'L.,~, ~. . ..
' ~ PAR~ 112
.. /.,:.-'. ~-. ,; - ,;.~
..... .. 2,..,. ~-,~.,'.~-~, (941) 774-8192
,. ~,, ~'~;,~ ,.,., ~ ,.',. ,. ~ '~ .
,., ,~,;,., ,, X: 'j ,,,?. ,;,
'" "': ...... ' ~:~ P~E~ NO. 69101
,.. ?,:~:"~::'~ SK~CH OF LEGAL DESCRI ~'~'~ .:'::'~
:~:.'.::'~::y ,~/~: ~'~ PTION NOT A SU
..~: :..:..'..;..?. ~:, :,,:::~ ,: . ,.
T" .' ".':~,;6.~.; .
~:: '.~..~ .;~/. ;'~.<~.,O . , '
::.... ~..,' . ......
. ..', ~':A
:~ ::'~;'.~ ..,. .; .'
"? ..
' :. LEGAL DES~I~ON
· '%',: . ?,.-:. <
· : .~..,:'
SOU~I ~L~ (12') FEET OF ~ NOA~.I ~0 ~ O~ ~ 150 0~ ~ ,. ..
PLAT ~ ~EOF, GOLDEN GA~ ESTA~S, ~T 07, AS RECORDED IN PLAT ·., '
~OR~DA. "'"
CO~A~G ~ ' SQUAEE ~ 0~.~ A~ES MOEE OR LESS.
':~:; .. , ..
:;.'
.': ..... ,..,.....
. ':-: ~'.',..
.....: -.': ·
.
'::': :~::":?~' SK~CH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SUR~ 'x"
~ BY: DATE'
: ........ cr,~ncc ~. mc~uoNo '~ J I .._ _ _
· - ~'orI-;.~SiON^L L~D SUn~O~ 12408 FE 1998
' ' ' .'.. .. COLMER COU~ C~RN~E~ COMPL~ ...... I ~.J I~/ '
· ~{ . T~ PmC[L ~0. nni~nnooo_ ....
j'..
TI ~ SO~H FI~EEN (15') OF ~IE NOE~ l 16S ~ OF ~ EAST ~
RANGEYEET OF26TI ~ ~ST 215. I 5 FE~ OF SE~ION 2~, TO~S1nP 4S SO~l, '. ,'.'
COLLIEE
O~
~O~IDA,
~-.~., CO~A~G~ SQUARE FEET ORO.~ACRES MORE OR LESS. i ,:
.'. ~. ~ · . :..:.
~',i;'. ' ~FESSIONAL ~ND SU~OR ~2406 ~*~
.- 330~ T~IAMI TRAIl NAPL~S~ ~ORIDA 341 2
.
~".'~:"?, ~".",~ OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROZECTS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SUEVEY~
· .'-i'..,.... :; sidevalk,.drainale, utility & laintenance eastetnt
"' LEGAL DE$CR.tPT~OH :
'G[E SOUTH TWELVE. ( ! l') ~ET OF THE NORTH I ~ FEET OF THE WEST HA~,
I OF 'THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, OF ~ NORTI't'~,VEST q~IARI'E~ OF THE
· QUARTER, OF SECT]ON ~S, TOWNSH'~ 4~ SOUTH, RANGE :26 EAST, ~
'"? :" COL,~CT'Y, FLOR[DA. "
· i CON'T*,rhrrNG ]~2 SQUARE FEET OF .0~! ACRES MORE ORLESS.
~ .' · , ~ ~T£. m.. ;
G~GE R. RICHMOND ' / '
.",'-: PRO~[SSiO.^L t.~NO SUEVEYC~ I~'0~ IFEB 01998
.- : OFFICE OF ~ ~E~ l
," ' .... .. ~I [ T~ ~ ~. ~1~ 34112a
~"':~' ~ ~ 3301 EAST TA~IA~I TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 , .....
-'..,', .~ ~ (:941) 774-8192 ~ .._t..
.. : .,'.":'.: · ;'; "';; P~E~ NO, 69101
~' :-'~.~.':.;"':.~ P~ P~c~ NO. 116 ~:' ':'"
..'- . ~:.~.'.
-' '::;'~ ':-'~.~ SK~CH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SU~ "'
' ;..,':~ ".... ~AR~R ~ SE~ 28, ~S~ 48 ~. ~ 26 EA~, ~ ~. I "
: ..'.. . .. ; :.: .
.,"}~'; CO~A~NG 12, S4~S~AREf~I~OlRRA~E~. ~ : .':
,.:~ ?; '.: ' ' PAR~ 114
.. ..
.. ...' ~.: ~ .'
"::" . "" · ~l;;~r~[; II. RIEl IMOND OAT["
;:'. ..... PROFESSIONAL LAND SURV~OR 1~2406
'" OFFICE: OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
... COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX
2,301 F. TAMIAMI TRAIt~ NAPLESI FLORIDA 341
·" ORAw~ B'r: C,~f.C~EO 0Y: SCM, Z: ~1£: El.£ ~-'
-- ;. SHEET
..... ~, .... ~,< 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL
'::V:. ~'~';.'.~"~:~ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 :..;.'.': ·
(941) 774-8192 .'.
~ ,";~: ..:.... . . ~
.. ~.:.. . ..~ ~'%
'., ";~: T~ P~CEL NO. 00'395~4000] ~ ..
'.',:'"'~" :": ;; SK~CH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOT A SU~
· . , j s~dewaIk, drstnaje, uttiJt~ & maintenance eamement
· .. ~0~ ~~
CO~A~O 3~2 ~ARE ~ ~ 0.O91 A~ES M~E ~ ~{.
PAR~ Ii4 :
i ~ . iiCI IMOND - :.--~
Pr~FESSIONA.[. LAND SURVEYOR j~2406
. OFFICE OF ~,~ PR~E~S
COLLIER COU~ C~RNM~ CO,~P~
'j ~ ~301 TAM,,Mf TRA,~ NAPL~$~ ~ORIDA 34112
, .~'i
· ' /.. ~ '¢..~ .. ~' ,. :,~. ~ .
.~" ·: ...'..'. · .. '., ..'
" '~ ..... t OP£ICE OP CAPITAL PROJ~,CT$
~ .... :..,..: :. ~'i.'.~; 3301 EAST TAMIAbll TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 ·
:'~ , ,..~.'~ ,. !....-.,~
.',--.,,,., (941) 774-8192 i..5.
· <': " ";'"-.',: .,.'
· ' ";" L.,' ....
· i' ' .',,': ;'.' ,.' :,
· ".,]:.'.,~.'... .. :.' '~;. .
~" :"; i' '
;. , ..-..~; .. ;'..:..~
· !~"..,.-.:p.".:.. ,.:.;;';.~ PROJECT NO, 69~0! ;-';' s:.:.-'
..: ..,~, : .:.~ , ~.~.:.'~'
'.':" ".':~';~.~ .' ;'::'J PROJECT PARCEL NO,- 1.15 ~:.,..'~';';.,:: '
T · .:'. ".': ;:..,: ~ - ,~...~ ~'..~
:"' ;'-'"".=~., TAX PN~CEL NO.;,, 00'19S~8000! .' "
" '.'- - ;:.,5;'.'-;
'" ' ':' LEOAL DESCRIPTION NOT A SU '-- -_-
..... '! SKETCH OF' ~'. .........
· . . . ,- .' . .,:;;..' ...
:. ,,,, ".~'..~ t'ee ,"~.-,p].e t:l.l:Ze ~.,.",,'/
i "~' .... ' " ~' ?''' '"
;'"'$~:~,' .' ' ';4
'"" ""~;"!~ ' '..."i " ' ~'., :; :~
· "' OF TH'E NORTI-tEAST QUARTER OF TI-rE NOt~TRWTr,~ Q~JARTER OF THE NO~ '; :....
,,,?. ,.. · ~, i' .'.
· ' .... QUARTER OF SECTION 2~. TOWNSHTP 4J SOl.,q~ EANGE 26 EAST. ~ ~, ;':;?';'~ .....
,......~.:~.~;. ~ .,... ,, FLORIDA. ..
~,~.~.: ,j. · ~..;;. ~ -, ,, .~
.~, .':.'i>. ':;.':. ;. ;' CONTA~NTNG 12,54S S(~AI~E FEET OW, 0.3~ ACl~ES MOI~ OR LF,.$S. :' ' ~'"
, -..:: .;,; -
.~ .. ~C... ;-.,.. ~....... · ,
' ' l~AlICl~ I 1~ : ....
"
;..
i.;. . : '
! .
. ~.' .. ~1
"'; (.;[z~'zG[; Ii, IIlCHblOND _DATE;
".. COLLIER COU.'n' CO, P FEB ( 1998
.','.. ~. (. ' .,. :',. ~ '*,..
',..:.:::,'::...':.':~ O?FIC£ OF CAPITAL PROJECTS "'
::; 330~ EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 '
(941) 774-8192
,., '~,- :..
· . 'r.~ ~RCE1. NO. 00~95t. 80001
:.:!..! ..:. .. SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY)
: "'"'"' :' aidevalk, drainage, utility, & naintenance elleeent · '
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE SOU'Iq! TWELVE (12') FEET OF TFIE NORTH 150 FEET OF TIIE WEST ONE
. HALF, OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER., OF TI-rE NOR~ST QUARTER, OF
· :. THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHTP 48 SOUTH, RANGE
":· :' ::. 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA..
... CONTArNTNG 3962 SQUARE FEET OR. 0.091 ACRES MOPE OR. LESS.. , .::.: ....
' ~ PARCEL 815
orr,cc or p.o Ec'rs FEE I 0 1998
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX
3301 F_. TAMIAI,¢I TRAII~ NAPLES. FLORI~)A 34112 _ P~,_ ~.,~t, _ ..
.:" SHEEr
· .,.,., ::,:,t O?FIC£ 01~ CAPITAL PROJI~CT$
· "..~'';.! 3301 ~ST I'AMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, ~ORIDA 34112
,., · ~.:~ ,, . · .
.<.."~.. '~. .' . :: :. .....
, .~.'..:... '.:~:,
· .. , .'~ .-.. PR~ ~O, 60101
',,, ,:~ '. k:.~ ~.. :.. .
' :' : T~ P~C~ HO,, 00105~60008 :':-.'":' .....
~ .. ~:.~: .;' . . .
:' . '~ SN~CH OF L[GAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SU~ :" ~ .....
. ;~.:~. . .. , :'..~:
: fee simple title L"'J'~'"; :..'' :
-~.,,.:.._:,.'..:: ., :: ..... ., ,
· ...~ .~.., ..~. ..,
· ~ -..- ~ .... .'~x~. · · [-....x.:..., ...:....~'..
· -.', ,. ~'*.'~" ::r ~
' · ,/:,i'.';"'"' '~.'~ t' ;" ' ' '
! -'.'~': :~?:.,...i~ ,.
...... n..z '; ....... ~ LEG~ DESk--ON -
',; :,...L~,' ..~;.::~'{ ..:?.'.:'" ~,..x., -..
..~..~:: . . ' ~ SO~t ~{IRTY EIG~ (~8') ~ET OF ~ NOR~ 1J8.0 ~ET OF ~
-, EAST O~ HALF, OF ~ NOR~AST QUAK~ OF ~ NOR~T
.,.6 . .., QUAR~ OF ~ NOR~ST QUAKER OF, SE~ON 28, TO~S~ 48
· : ....: . .:;~ SO~, ~NGE 26 EAST, COLLAR CO~,
·: .... ": PARCEL 116
. , _
COLLIER COUNW O~RNU~t COMPL~ FEB 1 Jlt98
' ' .. 3301 E TAMIAM[,..TRAIL NA~% ~ORIOA 34~{
.' SHE~
· :";. 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 .:
~ .,'... *. PROJECT NO, 69101 :*'
"' SKETCH OF LEBAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVE~ "
· .,::'i ',':,[J mtdewalk, drainase utiltiy & ~&tntenance ealeeeltt '* '*'
"...~*.,, :r '....'*'*:. · . · *
.... ':' :: LEGAL DESCRI~T1ON ' . ;
· , T~rE SOUTH I'WEL~ (! 2') FEET OF THE NORTH ! $0 FEET OF TRE EAST ONE '
ttALF, OF TFIE NORTHEAST QUARTER, OF THE NORTHWEST QUAR .TER OF
~: :..!. ::.. THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHTP 48 SOUTH~ RANGE . ,'. ..
.. :... ~:..' 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA..: :' .
· ' CONTAINYNG 3962 SQUARE FEET OR 0.091 ACRES MORE OR LESS. ·
"
PARCEL 816
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNUENT COMPLEX
.... ~ OFF£C£ OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
~ 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112
:' (941) 774-8192 ~!.'":." --
"."- i~, '.'"~ . .. ~
.. ':~ :.. ,. .: '.
';~ ~" '. '.'.'. ~[~ P~C~ NO. 1 tt [i~:~ . ,.....~..
.'~:~-~. ' .. ~ ~e~ ~0. 00~0~08000~ .
[:i.' .: · .;; ." ' .'.'.
..~:~u~ '.~: ':'. SK~CH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SU~ ' ~ ....' ~
'.,'; :~,:;. ~?~ ~ ~'" . ;~....< .
"'.,';':C?.::.: "~ ~;':' ' :""~
· -: '~(:x'~:,.. ::'J
: ,~,".7,'":: ~ ".: '.' ','. '~ '; ~
'..; :;X,';'..'..~ . ::. ';::-..:'.~ ..4-) ~ ·
.,'..'. ..... ',~ '~., lee J~mpZe ~t~1e ', '... .:: ..,
~. :,.{ . ~..'~...... .,....
;,-:~. ~;,,(/,> ...~.: · ~ · · ~. · . ·
-';': ", ' %~ST O~ HALF, OF ~ NOR~ST QUAR~ OF ~ NOR~
QUARTE~ OF ~ ~ NOR~ A~ST QUAR~R OF SE~ON 28, TO~S~ 4~
.. :..[ ....~, ;. SO~t, ~GE 26 EAST, COLLAR CO~, ~A.
': .... CO~A~G 12, ~4~ SQUARE ~ OR 0.2~J A~ MOTOR.S.
',. ' :' i PAR~ 11 ~
~2406 '
OFF,C oF FEB il 1998
COLLIF..R COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX
3,301
.,.'. '.' OI FIC£ 02' CAPITAL PROJECTS
~ 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,34112
, :' (941) 774-8192 "-"
"' : PROJECT NO, 69101 , '..'
.' .... ~ TAX PARCEL NO, 001~5080003 ";" ".
.. SKETCH OF' LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVE~ "~
:... : ... ::. .':.... .
.:.....:..: . !:: stdevalk, drainage, utilti'! & aainten~nce eaeeaent : '.'.
~..~: .; ;.::: :. : :..
,,. :.~..: . '" ~! LEGAL DESCRIPTION
',:. :~:'..: ~' ·
: ..:'-.' '. :~:i THE SOUTH 'rWEL~ 02') FEET OF THE NORTH IS0 FEET OF TRE WEST o~rE i ' '
": ',. HALF, OF THE NORTI-[WEST QUARTER, OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
T1 [E NORT1TW~ST QUARTER OF SECT/ON 28, TOqRrNS~ 48 SOUTH, R.A.NG'~
26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
.'. CONTAINING 3'962 SQUARE FEET OR 0 091 ACRES MOR, J OR L~ll.
· " ' PARCEL 817
Pf~OFESSION^L LAND SUeR ~2406
: : OFFICK OF C~IT~ PR~E~S
-. ;'[ ' 5~1 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, ~ORIDA ~411
'"' ' 'i ' SHE~
' GE. t311GE 4~'. RICHMOND
-,' Pf~0FESSIONN. LAND SURVEYOR ~2406
.' OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJ[Cl~
COLLIER COUNTY GOV[:RNM£NT COMPLEX
3301 F. TAMIAMI T~AI~ NAPt~E;,S, ~rl. ORIDA 3,411:
."" SHEET
0F£I £ O? CAPITAL PROJ , T$
t'- ".;: 3.501 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112
(941) 774-8192 ....
': PROJ£CT NO, 60101 :.:
:..':'.. ;' .....::?~.~ PIIOJ£Cl' PARCEl. NO. 81 8 .'.:....i.,~ ~ :.,..
.:'~i::.."-. ..~ TAX PARCEL NO. O01'g&S&O008 :.'". .'
"'' ' ' SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY)
.....,:<..> ;;'...:.:.. aidevalk, drainale, utilit! & m&tntenlnCl eaSellnt .
: ·
;t"; .;,.:. -';. ~:,
. :. ~.. .~ .' ,
LEGAL DESCR]3~ON
ThE SOCr~ TWELVE (12') r~-~- i OF THE NORTH !~ ~-~:i~? OFTHE F..AS'T ONE HAL~,
SFCT1ON 2~. TOWNSHm 4~ SOUTH. I~ANa£ 2~ ~AS't', ~31. ¢(:X/NT~,
'" CONTATNTNG 39~2 S(~KJ^RE F~ET OR ~.{~1 ACRES MC~-~ OR LF.~.
· . PArC'EL
·
~'~,',~.' ~-. ': . ¥:
v.~.~,., . 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
'. ~,."':'.'~.. ~ (941) 774-8192 ·
~. ,, '~,,?~.~ '.. ,~.~ , , ' . :' .~., ;, ! .".'
":. '~;l.,? .:,',': .... : . ;:.. '
· :,~..'.5.'~ ~, ... .'...
~,.:~,..: ,, ,. PRO~C~ NO- 6~101 , '.. ~:...,' *-'..~
~',~ ~.~ ~ ;,
· .,,',~.,;',: .... PROJECT PARCEL NO. 119
.... '~,,~ ;':-:'5~.- TAX PARCEl. NO ..... 001958&0007 ': ' "
· ,: :., .v~ ,.,..:; .;
~.-.'..'~','.' ' SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVE'Y')
~, ;.:; ;', . .;
LEGAL DF.~~
OF THE NORTHEAST Q~UARTEIt, C~ THE NORTII~.AST (~I~ARTEP~ O~ ~
(~J^RTER OF SECTION ;iS. TOW~IRHTP 4g SOUTH, RANGE 2~ F. AS~o COM.IIER
CONTACTING I ~, :~45 SQUAEE FEET OR 0.2~ ACRES MORE O~ L.~.
· - PARC~'~ 119
i~".: ~! 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
'~ (941) 774-8192
.... · ... ::: :..-.;.
'~)' ..... '; '"" ' ', PRO.CT NO. aq1131 ..'
,'...:,,,:,',;r.::. ' .
':;':'::~;.~"i ' · ':'~: PROJE~'~ PAI~CEL NO. a I a :
:-,'. r ~ TAX P,~¢EL NO. 001958~,0007 :
.,.~:: ;,;: = ,;,. ,. ..
,., .., ""? SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY~ '
'"' ,'; sidevalk, utility, drainale & maintenance easement
..' LEG,AL DE, SCR~
· NORTH'EAST (::~,.JARTER. OF THE NO.TH'EAST Q~JARTEP.. OF ~ 'NOR~ (210.,~J~"T'E~
SECTION ;211, TOW'NSHrP 411 SO~T'H, R. ANu-'~ ;26 EAST, COI~]'L='R ~,
. ",' CONTA]'NTNG 3~2 SQUARE 'FEET OP. 0.091 AC~ES MO~E OR L.E,S~. "
· · PARCEt. S19
¥,
.."~.~:;~..~.' . o, --
:':':",-'" 0I;'£1C£ O,P CAPITAL PROd~CT~
· -:.,.,:.];,~,.,', 3301 ~ST TAMIAMI TRNL NAPLES. ~ORIDA ~4112
~;..,~: '.?:x ,.., (941) 774-8192 .
: .... .' '""'~ "'~.~ P~ P~ ~0. 1'~0
.? · . :,~.. .
· .~ ~.'. ,.. ,, LEGAL DES~
~AR~R OF SE~ION =~. TO~S~p 4~ ~. EANOE 2, EA~.
~IDA.
CO~G 12, ~ S~ARE ~ ~ 0.2~ A~ ~E ~ !~.
P~
~.'.~ '-i OFFICE OF' CAPITAL PROJECTS
,:'/ ." "'. :.: COLLI£~ COUNTY GOV~:RNM£NT COklPLE'X 1998 '
-' '": "'i Dn,~*~ ~'r: C~I:C~,!~D ~'~':l~.mZ[:
" .... · I I IsHg~ ~. -
':':'~'"' OF£ICE 01' CAPITAL PROJECTS
i: 3301 EAST TAUlAMI TR~JL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 ·
........ (941) 774-8192
'"'::. ',:i'(';:."·
:'...,,... PROJECT NO. 6glOl ..'. , .... .
' .:: ." :. ' '.': PR~E~ P~C~ NO. ~n
"'- ";"' ".'~ T~ P~C~ NO. 001~5120002 '
,"...'-;:'::.. SK~CH Of LEGAL DESCRI~ION (NOT A SU~
.
.'~
~ S~ ~ ({2') ~~N~ I~ ~~ E~HA~. ~
SE~ION 28, TO~S~ 48 ~, ~N~ ~ E~, ~~,
' .. PAR~L 820
'~"':?" ; O]~PIC£ O? CAPITAL PROZI~CT$
"~:'.: .i 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
"~ ' · (941) 774-8192
; .... '-'. PROJECT NO..
· ' '"" PROJECT PARCEL NO.
· :t TAX PARCEL NO, ,00]:0/,800006
:.
:', SKI~CH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION {NOT A SURVE'Y~
"'"" fee siBple
LEG,M. DESC1UPT]O~
P~
· ~:..' '" ". :'
,. :. ,..::'},.:'.;:: ::.-:. [ OFFICE OF ~ffAL PROJE~
.,... :.,.. -.. : COLLIER COU~ G~R~E~ CO~P~ I .
.......... ;'.: 3301 ~ TAMIAMI TRAI~ NAPLES, ~ORIDA 34112
*'ie* "' O?FIC~' OP CAPITAL PROJ.~CTS
.., 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
':': (941) 774-8192 ~ '
'. ' PROdECT NO- 69101
.:'. *": PROdECT PARCEl. NO._ 722
.. TAX PARCEl, NO,_ 00i9~899006 ·
,SKETCH OF' LEGAL DESCRIPTION ('NOT A SURVE"~
;' temporary co'n.tr~ctton e~ement
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TI IE SOUTH TEN (I0') FEET OF TI rE, NORTH 160.0 FEET OF THE WEST 360.0
FEET OF THE EAST 1980.89 FEET OF SECTION 28, AND THE SOUTH FIFTY
(SO') FEET OF THE NORTH 200.0 FEET OF T~-IE EAST 180.0 FEET OF TIlE WEST
540.0 FEET OF THE EAST 1980.89 FEET OF SECTION 28, ALL IN TOWNSHTP 48
" SOUTH, KANGE 26 EAST, COLLTER, COUNTY, FLORIDA.
'O Co.%rTATNTNG 12,600 SQUARE FEET OR 0.289 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL 722
.:
'..:.~...f;,.. ;....,;
· ~,:.'~. · ' ;i
· : ': ' ;. ' . Z
': .:, :':. .i:-.: ...
'.';~ ..'-A'. , 'i.': .
~ ;';f..' '; ...
,::.. .... .: ..... ~ OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
...-:'...,:..~.......! co,,,E, cou~ ~,,,~ co,,m< FEn
~,'~.:;.,.. ,... ... ,IL, ,,4 ~.__ :~/* ,
. . . . ... SHEET ./~,,F ,,
,' : ~ OPPIC£ 01v CAPITAL PROJECTS
" .:..: ~"i 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
"i' ~ (941) 774-8192
"' ': '~' - PROJECT NO 69101
:... PROJECT PARCEL NO. m')')
TAX PARCEL NoP019&'800OO6
.... -~ ...: .. SKETCH Of LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVE~
eidevalk, dratnase, u I iaintenance
': ~GAL ~~ -'
:. ~ ~ ~ (12') ~~ N~ I~0~~EA~ I~.~ ~
. ~ NOR~A~ ~AR~R ~ SE~ON 28, ~SHIP 41
,. :, ". ~ P~ ~2
': ":'~ ' "'" "'";'
L'".' , · "':'
':.: ""'f :'~:'>" ~C H. ~CIIMOND '
' ;"~' ". ':" ~OFESS~ON~ ~O SU~R ~2406 I --
/,, :: ...., ~.~.. OFFICE OF C~lT~ PR~E~
~ ::~: ':" ' COLLIER COU~ G~RNME~ ~OMPL~ I
'~ -;- ~> ;:;'- :-' 3301 r TAMIAMI TRA~ NAP~[S~ FLORIDA ~411
"',' '..' ~- .' ' SHE 'l
'O" :.i O?lmlC£ 0£ CAPITAL PROJ~,CT$ ':'
· .. 5501 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 :'
(941) 774-8192
· ' : . PROJECT NO, 69101
· :.:: PROJECT PARCEL NO, '1'~,',
; ' TAX PARCEL NO, 001~)3920000 '!'
. SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY~
}:'~' ................. ;; fee simple title
LEGAL DESCRII:VTION
.: TH'E 5oLrr'H TH'rRTY EIGHT O8') FEET OF TRE N(~TH 138.~1 FEET OF TRE EAST ON~ HALF,
' OF Tl-m ~,VF..ST ONE HALF, OF THE NOR~ST QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOW'NSHTP 48
SoL.rTH, R~NGE 26 EAST COLLIER COUlqTY, FLORIr}A.
CONTAINTNG 2~,0RR S(~JARE FEET OR 0.576 AC~F_.~ MORE OR LF_.SS.
%. PARCEL 124
OFFICE 01~ CAPITAL PROJ~,CT$
3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112
(941) 774-8192
PROJ£CT NO. 69101
''.- PROJECT PARCEL NO.
?~ PARC[L NO.0010~920000
.. :: r,, SKETCH Of LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVE~
,.~;...' ..
~..: . ~
~:~ .
":'.". ' '" ~ OA~:~
G~C ql. RICIIMOND ~ ~'
OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
(941) 774-8192
vsm£ct NO- ~el~l
..: ,~, LEGAL DFSORIPTION (NOT A
.- " fee steple title
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ii ' , , : ~E SO.rtl TWENTY FIVE (2~3 FEET OF THE ~ORTH 125.0 FEET OF THE WEST
r: ONE H ^LF, OF THE E^ ST ONE HALF, OF THE NORTHV~ST QUA~TE~ OF SECTION
'... : *. : 27, TO~SHIP 48 SOUTh, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA* SA~D
· *" : '**i DESCKIBED TRACT CO~rTA~NING 0.3?9 ACRE (16~0~ SQUARE FEET), MOPE OR
: ~ LESS·
P.,,~CEL 125
,"::..*. ~,!~.' :,~
· ~ .: .'
· COLUL~ COUNTY GOVERNU£NT COMPLEX
· ' .... 3301 £ TAUIAMI TRAIL NAPt, ES, FLORIDA .34112 ;
." OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
'.' 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 ':
':. ' (941) 774-8192
' ~¢r NO ~910 I
U.'.. ;.' ~G~ DESCRIPTION (NOT A SU~
~,.., ...:.
. 'j ~.?.. ..
: LEGAl. DES~I~ON
· : HALF OF ~ EAST O~ HALF OF
' TO~SHIP 48 ~, ~NGE 26 EA~. C~ffiR C~, ~A; SA~
OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
PROJE:CT NO, 6glO]
TAX PARCEL. NO. 00~g3880001 -
":. '.. SK~CH OF, LEGA~ DESCRIPTION ,(NOT A
LEG~ DESCR~ON ..:
] 00.0 FEET OF TI [E ~ST 240.0 FEET OF ~ ~ST O~'HALF, OF ~ ~
ONE HALF, OE ~ NOE~ST QUAE~R OF SE~ON 27, TO~S~ 4S ?'.
SOU~, ~GE 26 EAST, COLLIE CO~, ~OE~
· . CO~A~G 5 5~ SQUARE ~ET OR 0.126 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL 72~ ~ '
:. . .~:..
· p~FESSIONAL ~ND SO~O. ~240S ..
, ...:: :' COLLIER COU~ G~RNME~ COMPL~
· .- 3301 E TAMIAMI TRAI~ NAplEsm ~ORIDA 3411;
OFFICE OF C~ r~!TAL PROJECTS
3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
~. (:941) 774-8192
;',; ":.:':" t PROJECT NO, 69101
.-..:' ;," ..'. '..' : PROJECT PARCEL NO. 'S25
.... ':.'; .. TAX PARCEL NO, 06193880001 ~"
:.:..:,:j..'.. SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SU~
; :..:'- ! .'
· ,'. '~.. '." .'.. sidewalk, drainase, utility I matntenanca easement
:'... :.:..:. · 'i "'
::;.~. -~: ..
, .-' :: '. . .. LEGAL DE~"RIPTION
.:.;..; , ',. :..
!i.:,"~' ' ' ":
.... .. ' ": ';' :.' ':i TH~ SOUTH 'r~VELVE (12') FEET OF THE NORTH I.,~o,n ~ oF wEST ONE HALF, OFTHE ' .
· · EAST ONE HALF. OF TIlE NORTHWEST (~KIARTI~.9 OF $1~C~ON :27. TOW'N~-EP 41 ,~)~rH, ' '
RANG. E 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR/DA.
,. COI'~ATNI~G 7926 SQUARE FEET C~ O. I1:2 ACRF.~ MOI~ OR ~ ..... .. , . ...
, . . . , PARCEI.
· : o nc[ or C,v,rrxL P.O:[CTS I F
', ' . 3? 0. E,,TAMIAMI TRAI¢ NAPLES* .FLORIDA 34112
I IsHE:ET
., !~ OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
"~ ............. ;.; 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 54112
, ~ (941) 774-8192
?:.' ... PROJECT NO 69101
:" ' *' PROJECT PARCEL NO. 1 ~
"~.' .. TAX PARCE/. NO. 9019/.320007
" "'" LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY1
LEGAL DESCRIFTION
-:. ",: , ..: TH'~SOU'TH'T~R~OS~,FEETOFTH'ENORTHllSI'e.r.'I"OFTRE£AST ,:.
· ,. ;.. ,,.. ~.; OI~E HALF OF THT. EAST OWE HALF OFTRE NORT'rlW-r, ST QUARI i:K OF SECTION :/1. :.:; ·
·....,,., ,. ; .: i,i TOWNSHIP 48 SOLFTI-I. R~NOG 26 EAST, COLLIER COUN'TY. F'LORTDA; SA10 .
"'*" DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAI'NTNO 0J'79 ACRE (16~05 SQUAR,E FE'E'T~. NIOR, F.. ~ i':',.' ,"
:~..:: ..?~ ~.-...?,.L?
· . ? :.'
',° !: ~.': : .' ~ ~.,..,. :.... . ..
,, i:.-.'i ':~,;' ,. .' .. .
~.,:,.'-'~'. · ..~ · .
· ! .. ~..~,: ,; ,:
,~'~'~:.,~ ,'?.?L-' i;.'., ;"~,
, .~'- :;' .. ?,:.,.,' *:.. .,..
omcc or C~T~ PRinCes K.~ ~-7"
C, Op ! ~rr~ t~r~t lkr1~' COV[RNUI~NT COIdPL['X --
· ': OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
.-,..'~ .. 3501 EAST TAUlAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34.112
· : ". .... (g41) 774-8192 .
-%1." ! PROJ£CT PARCEL NO. 1 '~,i --
,~,,; · · TAX PARCEL. HO, 0019&~,20007
:,..,.~4.',., ,...: LEGAL DESCRIPTION {'NOT A SURVEYS'
,. · fee sieple title
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
.-.- TH'E SOLFFH TH'[RTE'EN (1].~ 1:E:ET OF TH1~ NORTH !
; HALF OF THE EAST ON'E HALF Oi: TH~ NORTMWI~ST QUARTER OF S£CTION 29, i ·
: .. .'.' TOWNSH'1P 4 $ SOUTH. RANGE. 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNT~, ]:'uOR]DA; SA~D ..
· DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAIN'lNG 0.19'7 ACR~ (SSI] SOUAR~ FI~'"T), NIOR~ O~
" PARCEL 126A
, .. i ':'.
:. ': p~'I~ESSl6'NAL LAND SURVEYOR 12406 '
OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS ' r
~ COLUER COUI~T'f GOVERNMENT COUPLEX
· ' ~,.,%01 E TAUIAUl TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
,.,, OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
e · ¢ 3,.%01 EAST TAUlAUl TRAIL NAmLES, FLORIDA ,.%4112
:,: . ? (941) 774-8192
~':.": ' PROJECT NO.~ 691.0~
· PRoj£c'r P~CEL NO.
.... i TAX PARCEl. NO. 0019&320007
.... ::'" SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SUR%~'Y~
· ~ :~: r~:.. ~. Ti. CE SOU.1-H ~LVE (12.) FliRT OF TI.i~ NOR-i-H 1 .,4).0 f ,, ;, OF 1-HE EAST ONCE HALF, OF '1~ ·
· :if.../ ~.... ,~ EAST ONE HALF. OF THE NOP, TI.I%VE~T QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TO~'NSHTP 4!
., , ....:.,,,...'~ CON'TATNTNG?926S(~AREFEETOR0.1S2ACRESMOREORLES~.
: -.; .. .... ~ : ...
"..: .," .~..'..
; '~'
'W PROFESSIONAL LAND
1~2406
OFTIC£ OF CAPITAL PROJECTS FEE ~ 0 1998
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX ,--.O
3301 F~ TAMIAM~_TRAII, NAPI,[S, FLORIDA 54112 P~* ,
Pi
OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAJL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112
(941) 774-8192
PRO'CT HO .... 69101
PRO'CT PARC['L NO.--, "'~,
TAX P./4~ NO .... ,: . 0019&121208
LECAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY~
: ?. TOWWSNm 41 $(XITH. KANGE 2~ EAST. ~ CO[~rry. FM)PJDA; TH~NC~
~ ~ ~ ~ Ri~ WAY ~ ~ ~ ~ 9il; ~ ~ ]
D~G~ 21 ~S 41 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ WAY ~ A
~O~E RO~ (C~ ~, ~ ~ ~ DE~ !0 ~ ~
SE~S ~ ~O ~ ~ ~ ~ WAY ~ A O~ ~ 13~.~
L~ X Dl~ ~ t 162.~ ~; ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 41
BASIS ~ ~E~GS IS ~ ~ M~ ~ WAY ~ ~ ~ RO~ 0SI
BE~ ~ 01 DEG~ES 21 ~ 41 SE~S ~.
P~ 127A
OFrtCE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
COLLAR COUHTY ¢OV~RHUEHT COUPt, EX
3501 £ TAMIAMI TRNL NAPLES. FLOR~)A 34112
FEB I O
- &o
OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
..9301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLI:'S, FLOEIDA 54112
(941) 774-8192
J27A
SKETCH OF D£$CRIPTION
P,~J~. 127A
..m~'3m, 'P.O.C.
N.~ I/4 M Sec. 27.
Tiip. 44 S,.
GENERAL NOTES
2) P.D.B. Indicates Palm* oF ~eglnmlng
3) Sec. Indict*es Section
4) Twp lmdlco*es Township
5) Rge. Indico~es
G) ~/W Indicates
7) All dls~ances o?e ~ ~ee* and dec~ols *he?eoF
8) Dosls oF ~eorlngs Is ~he
lmmo~olee Road berg N.01'2B'41'~.
g) No~ volld unless sl~ed ~nd seGled el~h ~ e~ossed
stol O? ~he PrO?fSSIonGI
~IS IS ONLY A SK~CH
LH.R. NOT TO
OFFICE Of' CAPI?AL PRO,/ECT$ ~
3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA ,.94112
(941) 774-8192
PROJECT NO. 69101
PROJECT PARCEL NO. ] 2 7 B
TAX PARCEL NO. 00193~0009
D[$¢~IP~ON (NOT A SUEVEY)
fee staple ti~ls
COLOrfLeCt'NO AT '13.{E SO~'{'I,I~AST CORNER
l~ ~~ ~ ~ WAY~ ~ ~RO~ ~l;
~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ WAY
~ ~ WAY ~ A DI~ ~
BASIS ~ BE~OS IS ~ ~ ~
BErG ~R~ OI DEGAS 21 ~ 41
P~ 12~
OFFIC OF CAPITAL PROJ ,C $
3301 EAST TAMIAIdl TRAJL N~LES, FLORIDA 34112
(941) 7~74-8192 t27B
SK~CH OF DESCRI~ION
GENERAL NOTES P~
]) P.0.~. In.cotes Point o?
2) P,O.B. In.cotes Point o?
3) Sec. IndlcG~eS
4) Tep, ~lcotes Toenshlp
5) Rge, ~cG~es R~nge
G) R/~ ~d;cotes
7) AIl dis~o~es ~?e ~ ?eet o~ decibels the?co?
8) Basis o? BfGrlngs tS t~ Vest R/V I~ o?
im~okotee RoGd be~ N.0~'28'4['V.
g) No~ volld ~(ess signed o~ Seeled wl~h ~he e~ossed
seol o? ~ p?o?fsslo~l [a~ survfy~
~IS IS ONLY A SK~CH
z ~O . SHE~ 2 OF 2
'L.~.R. ~ SCALE R-05-97 PR-]27B N ~
FEB
OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
(941) 774-8192
,,, ]27C
SKETCH O~ DESCRIPTION
3) Sec. ~dic~e~ Section
4) Twp. ]ndlcotes Towns~p
5) Roe, ~d;c~tes
6) R/W ~dic~tes Right-of-way
7) Ali distonce$ orff ~ ;eel and declflal$ thereo;
8) ~asls o¢ ~eGrlngs Is the VeSt R/V I~ oF
]mflok~lee ~oad being N.01'~8'41'~.
D) Not valid unless signed Grid SeGled with tN eflbossed
seal oF the p~oFessloflol
I THIS IS ONLY A SK~CH
L.M.R. ]~-04-97 PR-]E7C SHE~ 2
FEB 1 0 1998
OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
3301 EAST TAM[AMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
(941) 774-8192
PROJ£CT NO, 6 9 1 0 1
PROJ~CT PARCI~ NO. 1 ??C
TAX PAR(:~rl- NO.
LEGAL DESCRII:~rlON (NOT A SURVEY)
S[C'I3ON27. TOV,9~i'{T'P 41 ~ ILA, NGE 2& ~o ~ COUNTY.
THENC~ NORTH 19 D£~ 09 MINt,'T~ 31 $F:(:(g4~ rr.~. A DISTANC~ OF
100 01, FELr. T TO Th.Z W.r.~ iUGMT ~ WAy ~ OF ~ RO~ tS !; ~ ',
NORTH I D£GR~ 21, M3NI.ZT~ 4!
CONTTN1J'~G ,WORTH AJ,.ONG SA3D ~ A DISTA,H(~ OF 711.&2 ~; ~
NORTH $9 D£GR~ 10 lvfl?,/t.r{"E~ ~ $~_CON1:~3 WEs'r ~ A L, TN~ LYI3',K3
FEET SOUTH. AS le~.A~ PLqU'L~,'DICULAR TO, ~ SOUTH ~Gl. rr of' WAY
OF ~H'MOKA,L£E ROAD (CR.. 146), A DISTA, NC~ OF l~0,0~ IrEET'~ ~
4 ~ D£GR~ES ! 9 ~rNtlT?~ 49 SECONDS EAST. A DIS'TAN(~ OF 93. I ! rr.,~ ~ ~
T'H:ENC'E ~ { DEGI~='E 21 Iv[INt.q"F.~ 4! SECONO$ ~ A,LONG A L{3q~ ],.Y~ 60
LINE OF COUNTY ROAD ~JI, A DI~'rAN(~ OF 931.$1 F'E~'r; ~ ~
IK)D,,rT OF BEGINN3]',~]r, ~AID ~ TRACT CON'T~ 1.10~
(41,~43 S4~J/JU~ F'E~T), IvlOt~ OIt I,.,ESS.
BASIS OF BEAX./NGS {S ~ WqE. ST IUGHT OF WAY ].ZHE OF COUNTY ROAD
BE/I'K3 NORTH 01 DEGP.~'~ 2l Mi'N1JTES 41 SECONDS W-r. ST.
PARC:~ 12'7¢
D SURVEYOR 1240S
OFIrK;[ Of' ¢AP1TAL PRO~CTS
¢OLLKR ¢OUN1~ G0V~RN~DiT COgPLEX
3,301 £ TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPI.[S, I~ORIC)A 34112
FEB U 19 d
OFFICE OF CAPI~'AL PROJECTS
5301 EAST TAJVlIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 54112
(941) 774-8192
PROJ£cr No 69101
PROJECT PA,qC~ hO.. 1~7~
TAX PN:~CEL NO. 0019~,72130~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A .¢;URVEY'I
SECTION 2'/. TOWNSRI'P 4l SC)U'T~ ~ 2~ EAST,
~ ~ ~ DE~ ~ ~ 31 ~
I~,~ ~~ ~~ WAY~ ~ RO~ flJ;~
way ~. A DI~ ~ I~.~ ~ ~ M~
~ os F~z; ~N~ ~ I DE~ ~ ~ 41 ~S ~ ~ A
L~ L~O ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~1~
~G~ ~ WAY L~ ~ ~ ~ ~1, A DI~
09~ A~(41~ ~ ~,~~.
BASIS ~ B~S IS ~ ~ ~ WAY ~
COLLAR COUNTY GOVER~,~£1~t ~n~ r~
/ FEB ~ 0 1998
- /~-: ~
O OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJ£CT$
3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA $4112
127D
SK~OH OF DESORIPTION
I
GENERAL NOTES P~ 12~
l) P.D,C. Indicates Polm~ or Commencement
2) P,O.B, Indicates POln~
3) Sec. Indicates Section
4) Twp. ]ndico~es Township
5) Rge. Imdicotes Ronge
B) B~sls o? Beepings Is the Vest R/V Ibc o?
Jmmokolee Rood berg
~) Not va[id unleSS signed ~nd sealed wl~h ~he embossed
se~L o? the P?O?eSSlO~{ I~
THIS IS ONLY A SK~CH
L,H.R. T TO -
~ I SCALE IE-05-97 PR-3ETD
".i OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
... " 3301 EAST TAUlAlvU TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
:-: (941) '774-8192
... PROJECT PARCEL NO. 1 ? 7 I= ,
: TAX PARC[I. NO, O019&?2100& ,...
.:....~,~:...:.;.~ . LEGAL DESCRIPTIOH (NOT A SURVE'~ ,.":'~"... '" ''.'J':'
· .3 ',"' ~'. ' ': CO.~ENCTNG AT ~ SOg'Tt~AST CORN~ll OF THE NORTHEAST (~JARTER OF :,:. ~
· :' .:' J SEC'T1ON 27, TOWNSHI'P 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAS'r, COI.,LrER CO1,J1'4'1~, FI..OR'rDA~ . :.
",.:..C~', ; .'.. ' ~ THIENCE NORTH iq") DEGREES (19 MINu'r~s :31 SECONDS W'E. ST, A DISTANC'~ OF · :' '
' ',.,-:,:- ..'i ·: lOnOR FEETTOTHE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LTN'E OF COUI'ITY ROAD 951 AND ~-~""" '; .....
· r 'THE. POrNT OF BEGrN'NING; THENC~ NORTH I DEGREE 25 MINt,rTF~ 4l S'ECONOS
;! t . '~..... i ,- ": THENCE SOLTTH 88 DEGREES 3 ! MTN~J'r~s 19 SECOI~I:)S %V~ST, A DISTANCE OF :
,,,,,~ .&,- ........ .; 6n.~'~ F~b-T; THENCE SOLrTH I DEGREE 2R teffN~"I'ES 41 SECOI~DS EA~'r ALONO A
i... ,:.~'i'~-:' :'. i: '::i?: L~E LYING 60 W~ST, AS N~ASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, $A10 WEST RIGHT OF
WAY LIN~ OF COUNTY ROAD 95 I, A DISTANCE OF 10~qJ.4 ! Fb"L:T; ~C1~ SOUTH
F.', ;. '. :. -,' kc: i ' [ R9 DEGREES 09 MIN'LrIT. S 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG TH~ soLrrH LINI~ OF "-
.: . '... ~.... :.. { AFORESAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 60.05 P~-~t TO
i' · ':.' ". · .' ' .: TH~ POI~rT O1~ BEGTN~r1NG; SAID DESCRI13ED TRACT CONTATNTNG !.4S5 ACRES . ,.
i (63,397 SQUARE F~ET), MORE OR LESS. "
i'i":." ";"':. '~ i BASIS OF BEARINGS IS TH,'E WEST RIG'HT OF WAY LI'N'E OF COUNTY ROAD g51 i "...
: BEING ,I'JOP, T'H 0i DEGREES 2iq M1NI..rT'ES 41 SECONI~S WEST. : ..,.
' 1 0 1998
~,~E R. RICHMOND '
..... : pArOF£SSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR jl2405
OFfiCE Of' CAPITAL PROJECTS :
couu[. COUNTY OVERNU[NT c PU:X
'.=':' OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
...:~. i' 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLE,~, FLORIDA 34112 ..
· ." (9 )
..,..., . .;.., 41 774-8192 327£ Jr":
: >,~,:,"..'' '4 ; ·
:":' '.:'" :' ?':~:' ::;~-i;':"::' ~ ...... SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION ~""/': .. ".
· :;.:.,:;...,. ,:. ;... ~ , ·
;.:....? . ..z;" ~, '..
'.:. ~i. :.~, .'. :'.;.',.: ~ . .
',' . '.],:,~ : . ~: :".
· i: t :," -. ' . :'. '~ ~ '.'
~. ~,t' '~ .. :'"'...:~ ,~O~A~ ~0. (C~-a4~) (Ioo'
~:~:':.': ; ' I i. :
· .. . . ~...;~ '
~ .". ~: .. -,.~". ,~ :.'.....
.. '.:.:.. :.'.;,. ~ . :-.
I~N~, ;;...,~,.. - .,'... -.
"' "'"" " PARCel. 12~: "- "
i*':. ~'[':-: ? "
· .. .: :;.'~ ~'::'.~ ~ ' ...
i:.': ~ :':" '"' ~ ~' '
: :'. :':.'4:"':i , PA.Ca. s2~'~ I ~.~ .
.' . .'- '.' ,~:' .,:
. .'.. ' '.'.. . -::r:; .~ ~ '
. . '.'! s.m'2a'41-£./[] ~ ~-,' ..
- .' : 1055.41' .~ , ' ,..
· ' ' ' . ' , N.~gl:~'31'W. -
'ii::. ' "' :': ...... ~' ' ...
' ~:i'~:.,.:.~..,.,., -- ,:;.;.. H.wo~'3~'W. .D,C. i ?:."' ·
:, ,..:. <., . ', , 100'0~° S.F.. Corner of
, "i::':~-::::.',': .-'.: ' N.F- ~/4 of ~ 27. i . '
:.' · Twp. 48 ~., Reg. 2~ £.
?,-':..' ':"' -'"': Ce~ler Cosmty, f'lorl~a
. :")i.: '. ':.'?"-~ PA~C~ ~2~:
:"':":" '"' "..i OENEEAL N[:]TES
?' : 1) P.r].c. indicates Poln~ o¢
'."'"":'i :.. ...... .1 ~) P.D.B. Indlcote$ Point o~ Beginning .:
· ; " ..... f 3) Sec. Indl¢otes Section
.... "'-' :. i.'..'i 4) Twp. Indicates Town~hlp
· :-i .-.; 5) Rge. Ir, dicotes R~lnge
"' :' ' 'i 6) R/~' indlcotes Rlght-o~'-~oy
-. . 7) Alt dlstonces Gr'e In +'eet -,nd declmots 'l:hereoF :
-~ 19) BosIs oF Be(~r'lngs Is the Wes't R/W line o~'
· c)) Not vatid untess signed omd scored wl~ch 't;he embossed
'. i seat oF the pcoFessIonot IGnd SU~'veyo~ , - ·
.. ,'~ :
~ THIS ONLY A SKETCH FEB ! O 1998
. ,
NOT TE} SHEET 2
L.H.~. SCALE t~-05-97 PR-I~TE -' -
,, OFFICE O? CAPITAL PROJECTS
3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112
: (941) 774-8192
PROJECT NO. 69101 :
i::'.i.'~' '-- PROJ£CT PARCEL NO. ~28 , .'
· i TAX PARCEL NO. o~1q292000] !....,-
:...' ',. SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY)
,~'. .. ,..'.+.. , f~ee eiIple t:l. tle .,~. ',
." ;:'::f!";' ';'!/:: ,i' ' "":
· ;.~. :..,,....,, :', .~ .. :
':' .:,,:.~,:'. ~: , .
. . ... , : 1
"'" ..... ;' '; . ' ' ~CTNG AT l"l.r~ NORTIfV~..ST CO~I',~"P. OF' ~l~'Tl'(~'~ 26 ~ 41
:'"." '" / ; R.ANGE 26 EAST. CO~LTERCOU'NTY. Fl..ORH:)AALSOLYINGONT1.fENORT~RJGl,{T
· ,; ,; ,~. .: ~'..:, .f
., .., -;.. ,~, .~ O1:' WAY Lr'N'E OF fM'~OKALEE ROAD (C.P,.1146); TH'ENC~ ~ 19 D~,.~ I6 :
, .. ,.. · ;~-,~ MtN'UTES I1~ SECONDS EASTALONGSAf~NORTHRIGI4TO~'WAYt,fNEADISTANCE
.
· -..~..."6 . ....-, OF I~OO~ REET; ~CE ScR.rrI4 I DEGREE 33 MTNt~'ES 36 ~E~ EAST, A
'. :" .- : DIS'TANCEOFIOOOI~FEETTOTN'ESOUTFIRIGH"TOFWAYLfN~OF
";;; "' ~ ~i; DX'MOKALEE ROAD AND THE POINT OF BEGINNTNG; THENCE SOUTH 19 DEGREE~ lit
.; ,..,,.;. , .... MTNq. rT'ES 1 ~ SECON, DS EAST ALONG SAfD SOU.T.H Ri~4T OF WAY t.rNE A DISTANCE .. ~
· .... --.,.. ..... OF 122O 60 FEET; TI-fENCE SOUTH ~tS DEGREES 32 M'INtFrES I I ~ECON13S WE~I', A
..... , DISTANCE OF 276.23 FEET; THENCE NORT14 R9 DEGREES 16 M1NUTE~ il S~COND~ '-.'
...... WEST, A DISTANCE OF 733.6a3 FEET; ~CE so~r~ I? DEG'REE.q ;3? ~ l0 '" .,~
,. : ' S ECON'DS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 22f).73 FEET TO TTI~ EAST RIGI-IT OF WAY LiN'E
O? A IOO FOOT CANAL EASEMENT; THENCE NoR'rH I DEGREE 33 MTNUTES 41 ·
SECONDS WEST ALONG SAfD EAST LIN~ Of T'ITE I00 FOOT CANAl.. EASEMENT A
DrSTANCE OF 37.0o FEET TO 33rE POINT OF flEGrN'NTNO; $A11:) DESCRrBED TRACT
CON=rAINTNG 0 65~ ACRE (2A,31~4 SQUARE FEET), MORE OR t. ESS.
BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LThtE OF
ROAD BErNG SOUTH R9 DEGREES 16 MIN3..rI'ES IR SECONDS WI~ST,
PARCEL 121~
i pRor£$SiONAL LAND SURVEYOR 12406
i , 330,]_£ TAMIAIdI_TRAItr NAPL, I~S~ FLORIDA 34112
,, .... ..: ..,,: ,,,-.,J'
SHEET .,' '
OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS ~.,.~
,..~.-:....T, 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 ~...:-
...;c.;'.:'.- . . (941) 774-8192 128 :":..' '~..
.',.:; ,, ~ , ~?.'-
'" SKETCH OF DESCRIPtiON
~:.:i:'::' . .,i ! t '? '"
;..' ~... ~,,
~',~., ,.' %4' , ,,;',.,' , :. .
'-...~.~ :.~,",';'/." ,: .'". ..
'. ::. T.:'~';;r';~' ~"
~., .,.. ;, ,.~.,' , , ;"....,.,
· . ,;..,..': ,.. :, !.'-;. ~'.
i i'" ':~'"' "¢'"""""""~"
· ...., ..... ~; i;~. ': .'
/.-N. Ll~e N.[. 1/4,
.. ..~ ,; ',: :....; /.~- 2~
.. ii?:;..;.,."i<,,,?,~ t': ':" . ',
;,,~..,~.. ,,. ,-s. eg~',e'T- / . ''.
' ;".{~. ".': ?i ~ ~ .~, s.-~,6 ~='.,M) ' '1,,,'-~°°'°e'
-:: i. :! PDB~
' ' ' / ~,.S.87'37'10'w.
, , ~ ee.~e'~e'w..-~ \ ~ :"'
.,, 723.6o' , ~ '
::" "' ' , .'.: i :~ ·
.... '":..'.i.: '~ , ~ ~ ~ '
· '; ';'. ' i :X ~"' -.'..:' '
' '"'~ CANAL :' :
· ;" ' "~ N. Li~a N.W. 1/4
· ' 5cc. ~6 i $.~g~?'12'~. ' .'
i ~}×' ': ' "'
.':! .? ! ....
· '., :-. ;;.., ·
::'.~' ?..' PA~C[L 128
· """ ..'.i..
.. .:'~:.:::.:i:..'.:.:,,.' :
:::::,?::.:".. ...
,..-- ;.,..~. ..... GENERAL N~TES
'i ~) P.D,~. Indl¢otes Point o¢
" 3) Sec. indIc~te~ Section
" .: 4) Twp. ]~d~co~e~ Township
· 5) Rge. indic~te~
6) R/~ I~di¢~tes ~ight-oF-w~Y
7> A~t distonces ore In Feet ond decimals thereof
. 8> ~osls oF Beorlngs Is the North
)mmoMotee Rood being S,Bg'~q~'E.
' 9) Not votid untess signed ond semled with the embossed
' FEB 1
THIS IS ONLY A SK~CH ~ ~/ _
,T~ I 06-0a-97 PR-128 SHE~ 2 OF 2
,,i OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
:' - 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
(941) 774-8192
.' ..... ," , PROJECT NO "
· : "-'. '~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~NOT A SU~ '
.... .,. ..-, . ,.:.~ temporary conltructton el~emenC
- ~NGE 26 EAST, COLL~R CO~, ~OR~A, SAID ~ OF CO~~
' ~' .' ::.:. ':"': ;. ,'~" .: ~SO L~G ON ~ NOR~ ~G~ OF WAY L~ OF ~O~EE RO~ (C.K ~6)
.... : ~OR~ ~G~ OF WAY L~ A DiST~CE OF 246.~ ~; ~ ~ 0 ,.
. · % · '. ' .' . ' DEG~ES 43 ~S 42 SECO~S ~, A DISTANCE OF 129.34 ~
'... ' ' ' ~IN~ OF BEGI~G; ~NCE NOR~ I~ DEGAS 37 ~S 10 SE~S
. ' : EAST, A DISTANCE OF ~.OB ~; ~ ~ ~9 DEG~ES 16 ~
' : SECO~S EAST, ~ONG ~ L~G 125 ~ ~. AS ~
':' PERPE~IC~ TO. SA~ NOR~ ~O~ OF WAY L~ A DI~ OF 723.~
~ET; ~NCE NOR~ SS DEGREES 32 ~S I I SECO~S EAST, A DI~AN~ '
OF 276 25 ~ET; ~NCE SO~ ] DEGREE 34 M~S 27 SECO~S EA~, A
. DISTANCE OF 3g O3 ~ET; ~N~ NOR~ ~9 DEGR~S 16 MI~ I[ SE~S
%~ST ALONG A LI~ LYING 138 ~ET SO~, AS ~AS~ED ~R~I~
. · SAID NOR~ RIG~ OF WAY L~ A DISTAN~ OF 426 02 ~; ~
gfl DEGREES 21 M1N~S 31 SECO~S ~ST, A DI~AN~ OF ~.~ ~;
~NCE NOR~ 89 DEG~ES 16 ~S I[ SECO~S ~, ~NG A L~ L~G
· 147 ~ET SO~, AS ~AS~D ~I~AR TO SA~ ~R~ ~ OF WAY
~ LI~ A DISTANCE OF ~5 ~ ~; ~NCE NOR~ 0 DEGAS 43 ~S
SECO~S EAST, A DISTANCE OF IT~ ~ TO ~ ~ OF BEG~G;
DESC~ED ~ CO~A~G 0~2[ A~ (22,~ SQU~ ~, MO~ OR
LESS.
BASIS OF BEAR~GS IS ~ NOR~ RIG~ · WAY L~ OF ~O~ RO~
(C R ~46) BEING ~ ~9 DEGREES 16 MITRES I~ SECO~S EAST.
TRA~
,..,:.._
""' :)1998
~£ClJI,c,£ R. RICH~IOND '. ,. · ..... .-..
PR6F£SSIONAL LAND SURVKYOR.'~'240~:.~ ...
orrK:£ o+' c.~u~f~ P~'O~CTS I~.
COLUC. COU.~ GOV[n.U£~. ~OU.~'X ;'
5501 E TAMIAMI T~IL N~LES, FLORIDA 5~,112
· :il OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
· TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 ' .'
.'~ ..... .... ~-... ! "'
ROe. 26 [. ~0.~' 276.25'
P~Ct'L
6EN£E Al.- NDTE$,
'.' D P.D,C. Indl¢o'tes Poln't o+' Comv~encef'~en'l;
' E~ P,D.B. Indtco"ces Poln't o~c Beginning
· 3) Sec, Indicates Sec'l:lon
' : 4) Twp. Indico'tes Township
i 5:) Rge, ~ndIccx~:es Eonge
7) At~ 61sl:onces or'e In Cee~c grid declw(~t=
lmmokolee Rood being S,Bg'16'IB'E,
9> No'c valid unless slgmed ond seoled wl~h 'che
seat o? ~he proCesslonoi tnmd ~u~'veyO?
THiS IS ONLY A SKETCH F
EXECUTIVE S. I,JMMARY
SELECTION OF THE NEWSPAPER FOR THE ADVERTISING OF
DELINQUENT REAL ES'I~TE AND PERSONAL PROPER'I~
TAXES.
QB,,IECT!VE: To obtain advertising services pertaining to the referenced
properties pursuant to state law and the County's purchasing policy.
CONSIDERATI~)N,~: Pursuant to Chapter 197, F.S., counties are required
each year to advertise the list of real estate and tangible personal properties for
which annual tax payments have not been collected prior to final resolution of
the unpaid debt. The list of delinquent real estate properties is to be advertised
at least three times prior to the sale of tax certificates. The list of delinquent
tangible personal properties must be advertised at least once prior to the
issuance of warrants.
Section 197, F.S. calls for the Board of County Commissioners to select the
newspaper for advertising the referenced lists of delinquent properties. In the
ever,t that the Board does not select the newspaper, the Tax Collector makes
the selection. Section 50 F.S. requires that such advertising be placed in a
newspaper of general circulation. In formulating this recommendation, staff has
reviewed several options that produce varying levels of circulation and cost and
also collected comparable data from other counties. The data indicate that use
of the Naples Daily News has generally yielded considerably higher circulation
and corresponding higher costs.
As a result of these findings, Staff met with representatives from the Daily News
seeking to reduce the cost of publicizing this information and in response
received an offer that includes both substantial general and specific rate
reductions from prior years. Staff concurrently considered seeking bids for this
expenditure, but after discussing the matter with the County Attorney's Office
and the Tax Collector's Office, it is staff's opinion that advertising in the Naples
Daily News remains the most cost-effective and legally compliant means of
distributing this information to the public at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost of the advertising (a total of four
insertions) under the proposed bid offer would be approximately $135,400,
which represents an estimated reduction of $58,200 or 30.1% from last year's
cost. This figure is subject to variation depending on the number of properties
actually listed. Upon selection of the newspaper, the Tax Collector's office is
respon.~,ible for placing and paying for the advertising. The cost of the
advertising is ultimately recovered from the buyers of tax certificates or the
original property owner.
FE IO 998 II
"o. "
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: N/A.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners waive the
formal competitive bid process and select the Naples Daily News as the
newspaper for the advertising of delinquent real estate and personal property
taxes for 1998.
Steve ~amelf;',
Purchasing/General Services Director
Leo Ochs, Jr. //~
Support Service~/Administrator
APPO F lVEEMBE TO ~V~ORY TASK FOR~' ' '
~: To appoint 2 mem~ to se~e 2 ye~ te~, e~g on December 31, 1999, on
· e Cifizem Adviso~ Trak Force.
CONSIDE~TIONS: ~s 5 mem~r co~ee ob~ co~W ~put ~d digcdon on
pro~sed ~get ~e~ (the geo~pMc ~ea desisted for re~bilim~on ~ou~ ~d~g ~m ~e
Small Ci6es Co~W Development Block G~t Pm~ ~m ~e State of FloH~
Dep~ent of Con~W ~.) ~ey ~ ove~ee ~d approve ~t applicado~;
mo~tor ~e pro~ess of ~e ~t a~~tion ~d ev~te ~e ~ completion of~e ~t
pro~. Te~s ~e 2 ye~. A list of~e c~ent mem~Mp is ~cluded ~ ~e bac~p.
~e Citizem Adviso~ T~k Force had 3 te~s exp~e on Decemb~ 31, 1997. A pgss ml~e
w~ issued ~d res~es were received ~om ~e follo~g 3 ~tere~ed ci~:
~P~IC~NT ~ ~
David Co.ca 5 yes
Vanessa Fitz (re-appt.) 4 yes
Darlene Koontz 1 yes
NOTE: David Correa currently serves on the Hispanic Affairs Advisory Board and the
Development Services Advisor3' Committee. Ordinance 8641, as amended, states "No person
shall serve on more than two County Boards simultaneously. If application is made for service
on a third Board, the applicant must resign simultaneously bom one of his or her current Board
positions, or the application for the third Board shall be disqualified."
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATI. ON: Due to the fact that 3 terms expired on December 31,
1997, leaving only 2 members, a meeting has not been held and it is recommended that the Board
of County Commissioners make the appointments.
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
GROWTH ~ .,.MANAGEM'ENT IMpACT: NONE
RECONIM_ENDATIQN: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the applicants and
appoint members to serve on the Citizens Advisory Task Force and direct the County Attorney to
prepare a resolution conf'Lrming the appointments.
Prepared By: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant AGEND~,~T~
Board of County Commissioners No.. / (///
Agenda Date: FEBRUARY I0, 1998 FEB 1 0 1998
Citizens Advisory Task Force
Work Pkone Ap~'d ~ .Da~e Term
Name Home P~one D~~pt 2~D~e
Steven H. Bigelow 0~13/96 1~1/97 2 Y~
1937 Emp~ Co~n
Naples, FL 34110
D~a: 2
Catego~: B~ess Le~
V~e~a Fi~ 0~13/96 l~ID7 2 Y~
2460 14~ S~e~ No~ 26~27~
Naples, FL 34103
D~mkt: 4
Ca~go~: Comm~W At L~ge
l~et Te~e~ 0~13/96 l~ID7 2 Y~
~20 ~ Avenue Sou~
Naples, FL 34102
D~ict: 4
C~ego~: Soci~ Sciences
Vi~ D. L~er 01/I0~5 I~I/96 2 Y~
257 Colon~e C~cle 2S~-9~ ~I~97 I~lD8 2
D~kt: 4
C~ego~:
~ei~ ~er 0~1~/97 1~31/98 2 Y~
5483 25~ Place, S.W. 35~7992
Naples, FL 34116
D~ict: 3
C~ego~: Co~w At L~ge
~is 5 member ~mmi~ ~s ~at~ on Ju~ 24. 1990. by
commu~i~ ino~ and di~on on pm~s~ ~et ama, (~e
rahab I ~o~ ~mugh ~nding ~m ~e S~II C~ ~un~
a0o~ve g~nt app~i~ons; ~n~or ~e 0~ of ~e g~t adm~n and
~mple~enof ~e g~nt P~m. T~ ara 2 y~.
Staj~.. Greg Mihat~ HUI Director:. 643-8330
Pg
d
Pl'mnc (941 ) 4.0.,1.2.1.~(!
FAX (9.41) 403-2331
HOUSING ANDURBAN IMPROVEMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 26, 1998
TO: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Greg Mihalic. Director
Housing and Urban Improvement
SUBJECT: Citizens Advisory Task Force Vacancies
There has not bccn a meeting &thc Citizens Advisory Task Force to review the applicants'
resumes for the vacancies on this commi~c¢. I suggest tha~ you proceed to the Board for thc
appointment of the applicants.
1. Vancssa Fi= - Re-Appointment 2 year tm'ms
2. Darlene Koont-z - Appointment 2 year term
Attached is a member analysis for the abov. applicantsl
If you have any questions, or require additional information, pl~as~ call me.
GM/jcl
AGENDA IT~E~M --
FEB 1 0 1998
MEMORANDUM
ocr 2 2
DATE: October 20, 1~7
C~ iss lon~
TO: V~ell ~lls, Elec~o~ O~ce
FROM: Sue Filso~ A~s~a~ve Assi~,
Bo~d of Co~w Co~ssione~
RE: Voter Regisn'ation - Advisory Board Appointments
The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for
appokntment to one of the county's advisory committees. Please let me imow if those listed
below are registered voters in Collier County.
Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides.
CITIZENS ADVISORY TASK FORCE COMMISSION DISTRICT
David Correa
11257 Longshore Way West
Naples, FL 34119 /4/'//~'~)-
Vanessa Fitz ~.~
2460 14th Street North
Naples, Fl. 34103
Darlene Koontz
4625 Chippendale Drive ~'~ /
Naples, FL 34112-5258
Thank you for your help.
.....
No. ,/Y" ffff-5/.
FEB 1 0 1998
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 20, 1997
TO: Oreg Mihalic, HUI Director
FROM: Sue Filson, Administrative Assist~,t,/J
Board of County Commissioners,
RE: Citizens Advisory Task Force
As you know, we currently have 3 vacancies on the above-referenced advisory commi~. A press
release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a r,~-ume for
consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
David Correa
11257 Longshore Way West
Naples, FL 34119
Vanessa Fitz
2460 14th Street North
Naples, FL 34103
Darlene Koontz
4625 Chippendale Drive
Naples, FL 34112-5258
Please let me know, in writing, thc recommendation for appointment of the advisory committee
within the 41 day time-frame, and I will prepare an executive summary for thc Board's
consideration. Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions,
please call me at 774-8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Attachments
AGENDA IT£H
.o. /_r;/v
FEB 10 1998
Pg. ~ _
David Correa
11257 Longshore Way Wes=
Naples, Florida 34119
Sue Filson
Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commissioners
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
Dear Sue Filson,
I am applying for the position of Development
Services Advisory Committee or the Citizens Advisory
Task Force. Enclosed is my resume. I believe my
background in Court Administrative will be an asset to
the board. I have previously served on the Juvenile
Justice Advisory Board of New York State. Please feel
free to contact me for further information.
No
FEB 10 1998
EDUCATION: New York Institute of Technology
Bachelor of Science - Behavioral Science
Major - Criminal J'ustice - Sune, 1980
Numerous Courses in Public Administration at J'ohn Say College of
Criminal Justice.
WORK
EXPER~NCE:
January, 1990 -
Present , New York State Supreme Court, Principal Court Clerk. Former Supervisor
F_Ti r-.A Responsible fo, the ca~ow rnana, ernen,
and the transfer of cases tl'u'oughout Kings Supreme Court. Plan and
coordinate work schedules;
13 ac. 9"/ Mo ,o= p,.,;
Evaluate personnel performance;
Review statistical reports;
Prepare writ'ten memoranda and reports to the
Administrative .ludge and Court Administrators;
March, 1982-
January, 1990 New York State Supreme Court, Associate Court Clerk. I supervised a
staff of Senior court Clerks in the following speei~ll-ed courts;
Arraigru'nent, Calenchring and Spedal Terms. The position requires a
comprehensive knowledge of statutes, rules and administrative orden
relating to the fimctional area of assignment, also the ability to make
judgments and decisions where no cleat guidelines exist.
October, 1981 -
Marck, 1982 New York City Criminal Court, Clerk-in-Charge. Assigned to multipart
courts supervising a sta~ofPan Clerks and other clerical personnel,
reviewing complex motions and orders and supervising the ~.%'urity ~
or' Court Omcers and I'm Captain. '
No.
FEEl
Pg._
March, 1979-
October, 1981 New York State Supreme Court, Associate Court Clerk. Assigned to the
Administrative Office supervising Senior Court Clerks, developing and
implementing work methods and procedures, also the assignment of staff
needs to complete the job requirements.
April, 1974 -
March, 1979 New York State Supreme Court. Senior Court Clerk as a Trial Term
Clerk. Assigned to the Special Extraordinary Term ,on a full-time basis,
dealing with specifc cases involving corruption in the Criminal Justice
System. The duties and responsibiLities of the Senior Court Clerks the
reviewing documents for completeness and appropriate form, and
supervising court personnel who are engaged in processing court calendars,
documents and motions for proper conformance with the law and court
Procedures. I corresponded with Federal agencies regarding aliens who
were arrested on numerous charges by the State or City authorities.
April, 1972-
April, 1974 New York State Supreme Court, Senior Court Officer. As a Peace Officer
of New York State I was required to have complete knowledge of the
Penal Law and Criminal Procedure Law. I completed a total of eighty
hours of classes in the use offirem'ms.
January, 1970 -
April, 1972 New York City Criminal Court, Uniform Court Officer. Entry into court
system. I at'tended the Court Officers Academy.
WORK Elected delegate to the Court Clerks Union.
ACTIVITY: Former President of the Hispanic Society Court Employees.
Former President of the Catholic Court Employees Guild.
CO~.~ClTY
ACTIYITY: I am active in civic and neighborhood associations. Appointed to the
Selective Service Board.Recipient ofthe ten year service award.
Participated in high volume voter registration.
Board Member of the Juvenile lustice Advisory Board appointed by
Governor Mazio Cuomo.
Mediator for the Staten Island Dispute Resolution Center.
Arbitrator for the Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan New York.
NO.
F£15 1 0 1958
Pg-_ ~
COLLSER HOUSING ALTERNATIVES. lNG.
6075 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY
NAPLES. FL
PHONE: 9U.l-~-lO~l
October 14, 1997
Sue Filson
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, FL 34112
Dear Ms Filson:
Please consider this letter as indication of my interest in continuing to serve on the Citizens
Advisory Task Force.
I have included an updated resume for your file and consideration.
may me by phone at 941-455-1031 during the day ifyou need any thing further.
You
reach
Sincerely, , .
Vanessa Fitz /
/vt'
Enclosure
cc: Greg Mihalic HUI Director
FEB
VANESSA FITZ
2460 14th Stre~ NorOz · NapE, Florida 33940 · Tdt~ho~ (Off) 941/4.$5-1031 (R~d.) 9411~61-027~
EXPERIENCE
DAVID LAWRENCE CENTER. INC.
6075 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY. NAPLrrS. FL 34116
(941 ) 455-103 1
Supported Holuing . 4/1.5/95 to Pr~
· Responsible for establ!shing housing for special neec~s population
· Establishes the neecLs for housing tn Collier County
- Oversees Section 811 Grant from beginning to completion
Research gl funds available for affordable housing
, Responsible for the first 811 Grant In Collier County
· Establishing a CHDO in Collier County
SUSSEX COMMUNIT1F~
PIN£WATER PLACE. PELICAN LS. NDING. BONITA SPRINGS, FL 33923
( Salta Manager, New Co,uttucl~. 1993 to 199.$
, Responsible for ~11 change orders
· Coordinate all inspections and closings
· Property Management
, Training of new employees
SUNRISE RECOVERY
HOUSTON. TEX,'.S
Clinician I - 1992 to 1993
All dient intake
, DSM III Assessments for court related clients
· Facilitator for ~ON
JOHN P,. WOOD P,L~TY
3255 N. T,,avltnMI Tg~at., NAI,~, FL
Broktr, Board af Direcu,n - 19t;4 to 1992 ,
, Sales in commercial and residential '
· Rental leases, property management of minimum 60 units
· Collection of rents
,. h,~.intenance of
- AG£NOA
Qu~ WORX.SHOP ~U~D Cr~'n~c~'no~ PP. cx;~ ~o. //0 ~
Ntw Btdford, Nt~ Hampd, ir~ - Aug~ut 6, 1996
· Will be attending FEB 1 0 1998
Pg.~ //
?arniami Trail
October 10, 1997
Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, FL 34112
RE: Advisory Board Openings
In response to the article in October 9, 1997, Naples Daily News, I would like to
considered for a position on one of the following: Citizens Advisory Task Force,
Gc'.'crn~,~,-,~ P~od,.,c,;.;,,':,ty Ccmm!.".cc or Development Services Advisory Committeef(..~C~o~
I have enclosed my resume for your review. Please contact me should you need further
information.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Dadene Koontz
AGENDA ITE~
F£B 1 0 1998
DARLENE KOONTZ
4625 Chippendale Ddve, Naples. Flodda 34112-5258 941/774-0620 d
~-.[..~_Y.J~F.~T HISTORY: 941/774-5081 (fax)
1996 - Owner - Village Falls Executive Services
Providing secretarial support to professionals, businesses and individuals in Naples, Flodda.
1993 - 1996 Immokalee Habitat for Humanity, inc.
Executive Director. Responsib e for day to day operation of the Habitat for Humanity program
in Collier County, Flodda, including overall supervision of two construction sites. Supervision of
both paid and volunteer staff. Worked with Board of D rectors in long range planning and land
,acquisition. Service escrow accounts for 100+ homes under mortgage agreements. Prepare all
~ease agreements, deeds and mortgages for properties conveyed. Or~.anize all special events.
Public appearances to promote support of Habitat program. Responsible for receipt, recording
and deposit of all donations; payment of invoices; maintenance of accounting records to be
submitted to bookkeeper, collection of delinquent mortgage a._c~..,unts, including working with
attorr~ey in eviction or foreclosure actions, as .ecessary. Compi,e, edit and publish quarterly
newsletter and annual report.
1993 Society National Trust Company
Trust Associate - Administrative Assistant to Trust Officers. Responsibilities included assisting
Trust Cf-ricers in establishing accounts; handling routine administrative problems; representing
the Bank in account relationships with customers; new business development; cledcal support
to officers; u'acking accounts t'or periodic scheduled review by Trust Administrative Committee.
Resigned this position to accept offer as Executive Director of Habitat for Humanity, a not for
profit organization in which I had been active as a volunteer.
1989. 1993 Fifth Third Tr'ast Company
Trust Associate. ~
1988 - 1989 Stanley S. Phillips, Attorney at Law
Legal secretary.
1985-1988 Millonig, Bart and Brunner, LPA
Secretary and administrative assistant to managing partner. Responsibilities included
administration of employee benefits and supervision of support staff in addition to normal
secretarial duties.
1983 - 1985 Citizens Federal Savings and Loan Association
Trust Administrator
1976 - 1983 Eadey and Thc~mas, At1.~f'ney~ at Law
Legal se~etary
~,.D_U C A TION
Graduate Monroe High School, West Manchester, Ohio. Business courses.
Attended Sinclair Communit7 College, Dayton, Ohio; Edison Community College, Naples; International College
of Naples and Flodda Trust School.
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Elected two terms City Council, Eaton, Ohio. Former member Miami Valley, Ohio, Regional Plannin
Commission. Former President, Women's Republican Club of Preble County, Ohio. Formerhnember, Boar~g
of Directors, Immokalee Habitat for Humanity, Inc., and East Naoles Civic Association Served as member and
vice chairman of Collier County Parks and Recreal~on Advisory Board. Member of N
References on request. NO._._~ ~
FEB 10 1998
RECEIVED
OCT 2 0 ~B?
~,o~ra of County Commfssfoners
October 16, 1997
Ms. Sue Filson
Board of Collier County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112-4977
RE: Citizens Advisory Task Force
Dear M~. Filson:
I am in receipt of your letter dated October 1, 1997 in which you have informed me that
my appointment to the Citizens Advisory Task Force expires on December 31, 1997.
At this time I do not wish to be considered for another term. I look fom~ard to serving the
County in another capacity.
~~. Bigelow
1937 Empress Court
Naples, FloNda 34110
AGF. NDA~ LTF..~I,
FEB 10 1998
- o. ..... ., . , ~-' ~ ~...
.~PPOINTMENTOF'MEMBER(S) TO.TIlE PELICAN~B~Y. MSTBUADVISOR.Y': ~....<,.-..;2 .-. ':i
OBtain: To ap~int 5 mem~ to se~e 4 y~ ~m, e~g on J~ 29, 2001, on
~e Pelic~ Bay MS~U Ad~so~ Commi~.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee has 5 terms expiring on
January 29, 1998. This 15 member Advisory Committee was established by Ordinance 90..11
and amended by Ordinance 91-22. The Division provides landscaping services, including all
public road maintenance and park areas, street lighting services, aquatic management services,
beach cleaning, and the Clam Bay Restoration Project. It is the Division's responsibility m
provide the framework of Ions-term ~ i)lm~fi~S ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~
of Pelican Bay while ensuring both the soctal and financial well-boing of the Pelican Bay
Community. A list of the current membership is included in the backup.
A press release was issued and resumes were received fi'om the following 6 interested citizens:
APPLICANT pISTRI~ ELECTOiR
David A. Roellig - Resident 2 yes
~l~ Comelia Kriegh - Resident 2 yes
James A. Carroll - Resident 2 yes
J. Russell Mudge - Resident (P~E-APPT) 2 yes
Glen D. Harrell - Commercial (RE-Al)PT) 3 yes
Maureen McCarthy - Resident 2 yes
COM~,~TTEE RECOMMENDATION: Glenn Harrell - RE_APPT
David A. Roellig
Russell Mudge - RE-APPT
James A. Carroll
Maureen McCarthy
FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPAq: NONE
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the
recommendation for appointment and appoint 5 members, and direct the County Attorney to
prepare a resolution confirming the appointments.
Prepared By: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commissioners -
~o. / ,~.~, .~
Agenda Date: FEBRUARY 10, 1998 - -
Pg,. /
Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee
Name flon~ Phont ~~t 2n~~ 2~ T~
Oeorg~ H. H~on 262~17 03~/96 01~9~8 2 Y~
81 t Pitc~ Apple L~e 597~95
Naples, ~ 34108
Db~ct: 2
Catego~:
~om~ C. Bm~ 0ID4/95 01~9~ 4
8415 Exc~b~ C~le B-I 59~1~g
Napl~, FL 34108
Db~ict: 2
C~ego~: Resider
Glen D. ~ 5g~160S ~0~ 01~9~8 4 Y~
Naples, FL ~ ~ ~ ~
C~tgo~: Comm~i~evaIo~
~ B. V~ley ~93 01~9~ 4 Y~
8111 Bay Coloay Drive ~ ~an-3nna 1/1~97 01~9/01 4 Y~
Naples, ~ 34108
D~: 2
Catego~: Resider
C~I~ Pop~r 597-a2~ 0I~9~1 01~9~ 3 Y~
475 Se~ate ~ve ~8~ 01.~9~g 4 Y~
Naples, ~ 3a103
D~: 2
C~go~:
5811 Pe~c~ Bay Blv~, ~15 5~7-~ I/1~ 01~9/01 4 Y~
N~I,, ~ 34108
D~ 2
C~o~: R~d~velo~
B~ou W, Yomg 01~9~I 01~9~5 4 Y~
6760 Pe~c~ Bay Blv~ ~334 5~17~ 1~ 01~9~ 4 Y~
N~I~ ~ 34108
D~ 2
C~o~: R~d~BPOA
Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee
· 'ork PAon~ Appt'd
i' l¥arfte Homt Phont D~R~pt
George H. W~er ~93 01~9~7 4 Y~
712 Hea~ L~e 566-3~1 1/I~97 01~9/01 4Y~
Naples, FL 34108
D~ct: 2
C~ego~: ~esidea~C~B
J. R~e~ Mudge 01~9~I 01~9~ ] Y~
16 L~ Bns~ Way 597~3 ~ 01~9~8 4Y~
Naples, ~ 34108
Caego~: Kesidea~BPOA
209 MaEson ~ve 59749~ 1~9~ 01~9~ 4
Nap[~, ~ 3~110
D~: 5
Catego~: Non-KesidenEA~omey
Co~ P. Obl~y 01~9/91 01~9~5 4 Y~
802 Sl~hp~e Co~ 591-18~ 1~95 01~9~ 4 Y~
Napl~, ~ 34108
f' D~t: 2
' C~ego~: R~sident
8191 Lowb~ ~ve
Naples, FL 34109
D~ct: 2
C~ego~: Develop~
F~d~ck Flano
800 La~l O~ ~ve, S~te 2 59~g 1~5 01~9~ 4 Y~
N~I~ FL 34108
D~' 2
C~go~: R~id~t
5555 H~a Po~t D~e, ~170
Napl~, ~ 34108
D~: 2
C~o~: R~idm~BPOA
........... f ii~A.G£NOA I~'47~-)x/o[M '
! - ?g
Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee
Work Plton~ ~ppt'd ~ ~::t Term
:Va~ Ho~ Phon~ D~R~p: 2~~e
Herbert H~son 01/14/97 01~9/01 4Y~
60Ql PeUc~ Bay Blv~, ~160 59~9~
Naples, ~L 34108
~is 15 mem~r ~mmiE~ was created ~ 0~. No. ~111 ~nd
an~ 9~15 to aid and a~ist ~e Coun~ ~nager and ~
dete~in~ ~e n~ and quanfi~ of e~o~i~ I~
assist and p~e in~ ~ ~e Coun~ Man~ ~d ~e
exp~ifious ~ns~r of s~t lighting. ~ter ~nage~t
ms~ibilifies and obl~aUons ~m ~e Pelion Bay lmp~nt
Staff: Jim Ward, Pelican Bay Services DMsion: 597-1749
MEMORANDUM
DATE' December 30, 1997
TO: Vi.nell Hills, Elections Office~-,4'/~',
FROM: Sue Filson, Administrative Assista~, ' ~
Board of County Commissioner~
RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointment~
The Board of County Commissioners will soon consider the following individugl~ for
appointment to one of the county's advisory cornmiIt~$. Please let me know if those listed
below are registered voters in Collier County.
Also, please lin thc commission district in which each applicant resides.
PELICAN .t3AY MSTBU ADVISORY COlvfiM COMMISSION DISTRICT
David A. Roellig 7~
6000 Pelican Bay Blvd., #204 ~
Naples. FL .34108
5964C°meliapelicanK'dcgh
Bay Boulevard
Naples, FL 34108
/ames A. Carroll
8430 Abbington CLrcle, Unit C-31
Naples, FL 34108 "~ ~
J. Russell Mudge
16 Las Brisas Way ~ ~
Naples, FL 34108
Glen D. Harrell
9589 Cresam Lake Drive, #202
Naples, FL 34109
Maureen McCarthy
6075 Pelican Bay Boulevard
Naples, FL 34108
'Ilmnk you for your help.
TO: Sue Filson
FRO~I: James P. Ward
DATE: January 26, 1998
SUB,IECT: Pelican Bay MSTBU
Advisory Committee Appointments
In accordance with your Memorandum of December 30, 1997 transmitting the resumes
that were received to fill the vacancies on the Pelican Bay Advisory Committee, I am
herewith submittin,g the recommendations of the present Pelican Bay Advisory Committee
for Board consideration:
PAP.,RLI_CA,NT CATEGORY AREA OF EXPERTISE
Glenn Harrel[ Commercial Reappointment - Member since 1994
General Manager Waterside Shops
David A. Roellig Resident Retired Army Corps of Engineers
Geologist and Engineer
Russell Mud,ge Resident Reappointment - Member since 1991
Retired Accountant
Board of Directors Pe~ican Bay
Property Owners Assn.
James A. Carroll Resident Retired Mechanical Engineer
Maureen McCarthy Resident Retired financial services, customer
service and quality consultant
I have attached to this Memorandum the procedure utilized by the Pelican Bay Services
Division to provide recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners for the
appointment of' these new members. I have also attached a copy of each of the signed
recommendations from the current members of the Pelican Bay Services Division
Advisory Committee.
AGENDA I E~!t~
.o.
FEB 10 1998
PG o ~_.___
Memorandum
Ms. Sue Filson
January 26, 1998
Page 2
In addition to the written communications from the members of' the Advisory Committee,
the Committee held an Open-noticed Public Meeting on Monday, January 26, 1998 at
9:00AM to discuss and finalize its recommendation to the Board o~' County
Commissioners. That final tabulation is included in the Schedule of Recommendations by
the Advisory Board Members. That schedule will indicate to you the t~ee members of
the Advisory Committee who were not present at the meeting on .l'anuary 26, 1998, but
provided written communications which were entered of Record at the 1/16/98 meeting.
In addition, Mr. Hermanson provided recommendations at the meeting with no written
backup. Finally, you will note in the backup material that one member of the Advisory
Committee, Mr. Werner, changed his written vote as communicated in the backup matefi,,l
and which changed recommendation is included in the schedule provided to you.
I would appreciate it if the above referenced Memorandum and back up material fi.om the
Advisory Committee could be provided to the Board of'County Commissioners in the final
recommendation package sent to the Board.
I believe all of'the above individuals will provide significant additional experience in their
respective fields and will work well with the existing Advisory Committee.
Our next Regular Advisory Committee Meeting is scheduled for February 4, 1998.
Anything you could do to have this item placed on the February 3, 1998 Commission
Agenda for appointments would be greatly appreciated.
AGE~
No,
FEI ! 0
M£MORAND~
TO: P~lican Bay Advisory Commiuee
FROM: lames P. Ward
DATE: December 31, 1997
SUBJECT: Advisory Board Membership
In order to en.sur~ that the Pelican Bay Ser,'ic~ Division mee~ the rmtutory r~luir~raents r~lalive to the Divi~on's
r~-ommen~tion to the Board ~ County CommJr~ioner's for appoinm~nl to the Advisory Commit~, tbe
following procedur~ is being t~commended for utilization by the Advisory Commiv,~. ~ procedur~ has been
~-viewed ~nd approved by the County Attorney.
PROCEDURE: In order to obtain input from the existing Advimry Commiuee for the aplmintment ot new
membcrs, attached to this memorandum ar~ copies of the r~'~rnes receiv~ by the Board ot County Commi.~ioner~.
They are as follows:
1. David A. Roellig
2. Cornelia K.reigh
3. James A. Carroll
4. J. P, oa$cll Mudge
5. Glen D. Harrell
6. Maureen McCarthy
F ch member is bei s . ked to to the r i sio.'s oink. by 9. l 0S. ot .'ho
would lLke to see appoimed to the Advisory Commitlee.
Each recommendation r~urned by the Advisory. Member must be sent to the Division's oflic~ either by mail or by
fax and r~ccivcd in the Division's oflic¢ on or before the date noted above. The r~-ommcndation must be signed
by the Advisory Commiuee Member and will become a part of the Division's Public Records.
Upon r,~:cipt of each member's r~zommendatious, ~ will labulale these recommendations from the Advisory
Commiuee and the five c~mdidmes receiving the highesl number ~ vo~ from this p~----~ will n~,'e a
rr, commcndation by rta/f, which will be fonvarded on to the Boa~ of County Commi~ioners for appointment to
the ^d~sory Committee.
It is important that each member eusur~ tha! you do no~ talk toeach other relative io the r~o~on$ which
you will make ~o stuff. Please feel fr~ ~o w~'ite any comments that you may have on .your r~commendatious for the
Advisory Committee.
There will be no formal discur~ion by Ihe Advimry Commii~ee ~! ~
Additionally, it is imponan~ to recognize that the County Commir~ion in itl* leglr~,.~'e ~u?~--~ [ms tim ~blllty to
either accept or reject any r~commenda~ion~ of thc Pelic~u Bay ,~vic~ Division and th~ tl~ m~-nmrandum alon[
with a copy of the Advisory Committee's signed recommendatious will be forwardad ou to the Bom~
Commissioners and included in the back'up mate~l for their consider'ation.
If you ha*ye any qucstions relative to this matter, please feel rrm ~o c~ntac~ me. AGEND, A,,_~I Tx,~4 .
P9 · .._._.._~
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 5, 1998 i~
TO: Jtrnes P. Ward, Division Administrator
Pelican Bay Services Division
FROM: Heidi F. Ashton, Assistant County Altomey
RE: Pelican Bay Services Division
Advisory Board Members.hip
IlLS No. ?EL97121731
In your recent Request for Legal Services ~ubmissiort, you explained that you had
advertised in the newspaper a solicitation for five advisory board member~ for the Pelican Bay
Service Taxing and Benefit Unit. You stated that you typically receive input from the exi~ing
Advisory Committee member~ as to which cand|dates they recommend for appointment. You
explained that ex/sting members will receive applications for the candidates, and they' will return a
list of five members that they would each like to see appointed to the Advisory Committee. Each
recommendation returned by the Advisory Committee member must be ~igned and becomes a part
of the public records. Upon receipt of' each member's recommendations, you will tabulate the
recommendations, and the five candidates receiving the highest number of recommendations from
tiffs process will receive a recommendation by staff which will be forwarded to the Board of'
County Comrniss'icners. You asked whether there is a legal problem with th~ procedure. The
answer is no.
Ordinance No. 90-111 creates the Pelican Bay Service Taxing and B~n~fit Unit and the
Advisory Committee. It does not require a recommendation from the existing Advisory
Committee for new appointments. Since there is no procedure in the ordinance, sa long sa the
Florida Government in the Sunshine Law is complied with, I do not see a problem. F. ach
Advisory Commit'tee member must make hi.gher deci~on without disturb'ion with the applicant~
and without discussion among themselves. It is crudal that each member who returns a
recommendation sign Ns/her name clearly on the recommendation and return all inf'on~ation that
he/she used to determine the five members for recommendation. This documentation will then
become part of the public record. As long as the ~bove is follow~l. I beli./¢e that the~
compliance with the Sunshine Law.
I have also advised you that staff should advise the Board of County Commissioner~ of
this procedure and that a recommendation from the Advisory Committee i~ not requir~ I~
ordinance.
Please feel free to call me it'you have any questions.
David C. Weigei, County Attorney
Collier County
Pelican Bay Services Division
Schedule of Votes by Advisory Board Members
Applicnnts
Advisor7 Board Glen David James J. Russ Mnureen Cornelia
Members Harrell Roelli~ Carroll Mudge McCarthy Kreigh
Thomas Brmvn 1 I I ! 1
Rod.key Craighead ~ I I I 1
Glen Fiarrell ~ I I I I I
George Hermanson ~ 1 I I I 1
John Ho)~t .~!~ 1 I 1
I
1
J. Russ Mudge .~ I I 1 I 1
Cora Obley I I 1 I 1
Anthony Pires 1 I I I 1
Charles Popper 1 I I I 1
Alan Varley 1 I I I 1
George Werner I! 1 I I I 1
Sub-Total ~ 12 12 10 10 ? ?
The following Advisory Board member~ recommendations were received by writlee
communication.
Fred Flatlo I I I I 1
Ed Grfffith I I 1 I 1
Herb Hasson Iii I I I I 1
Sub-Total 3 3 .1 3 2 1
Total - All Votes 15
AGENDA I T.E-14
NO
PROEEDUR.~: In orc~ to c~czia input i,m= the existi~ Advim~ C~ ~ ~ ~~
2. ~ ~
,, ~. ~ D. ~l
AGENDA
FEB 10
To: From: Imrbzrz ~lllh
FEB 1 0 1998
Pg · ~~___~
TO: Pelican Bay Advisory Committee
FROM: Sarne~ p. Ward
DATE: December 31, 1997
SUBJECT: Advisory Board Membenhip
In order to cnsuxe thai thc Pelican Bay Services Division m~-'ts th~ statutory r~tireme~ re. lag~ to th~ Division's
recommcnciation to thc Board of County Comm!s_,'i'oner's for appoint to th~ Advisory Committee, tl~
following procedur~ is being recommended for utilization by t~ Advisory Committ~ Tlgs p~ has been
reviewed and approved by thc County Atlorney.
PROCEDURE: In order to obtain input from thc existing Advisory Committee for th~ appointme~ of
members, att:~chcd Io this memorandum are copies of thc resumes r~'eived by the Board of Cotmty Commissioners.
Ti~ey are as
2. Cornelia Kreigh ,'l/~ /
6. Mzureen McCarthy
Each member is being asked to relura to the Division's office, by ,l'anua~ 9, 1998 a list offiv~ m~ who you
would like to sec appointed lo the Advi~D, Committee.
Each rt'com,nendation returned by the Advisory Member must be ~nt to the Division's ~ either by mail or by
fax and received in the Division's of Hc~ on or bef'or~ th~ ~t~ noted above. The r~umm~atation must be
by the Advisory Committee Member and will he. me a ~ of rial Division'l Public
U~n receipt of e~ch member's r~commend, ations, ~ will tabul~ tbe~ mcomme~gons ~ ~ Advisory
Committee a~d the five can~cla~es receiving tbe highe~ ~uml~' of v~e~ ftum this la'uca~ will ~eeive
recommendation by s~ff, wMch will be forwarded on t~ th~ Boa~ of' County Commissioners I'm' al~oinlment
the Advi~ry Committee.
It is important that each member ensure that :~uu do not talk to ~ ~ ~ m tl~ ~
yoa will maXe to na~. ?lea.~ feel free ~o write any cumments thai y~ male ~ ~ ~ ~ fro' tl~
Advisory Committee.
There will be no formal discussion by thc Advi~ry Commi~le~ at · m~ting.
Additionally, it is irnponant lo recognize that the County Commi~ion in its' legislas,~ ~ ha~ tl~ al~lity
either accep~ or rejec~ any recommendations of the Pelican 15a~ ~e~eice~ Division ~ thai I1~ ~
with a copy of the Advi~ry Committee's 'qg~xl recummendation~ will be fon~xl~ ~m ~ tl~ ~ of
Commi~ioners and included in the backup malerial for their considerati~.
I/'you have arty qued. ions relative to this mat~-,r, pleas~ fe~l ft~ m cunta~ m~. ' ~0£fil
N 0 · ..,/_~1.~
I~OM.: ~ ?. Ward
DATF~ ~ 3I. 1~
~~f~
AGEND
No,
FEB 10 1998
W/Al
~anuary 9, 1998
James P. Ward
c/o Pelican Bay Services Division
801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 605
Naplcs, Florida 34108
Dear Jim:
Pursuant to your request, below please find my recommendation for the
Pelican Bay Advisory Committee.
1. Glen D. Hare'ell
2. Russell Mudge
3. David A. Roellig
4. Maureen D. McCarthy
5. Cornelia F. Kriegh
If you have any questions or concerns about the above recommendations.
please feel flee to call me.
Since
~. Harrell, CSM, CMD
General Manager
.o.
FEB 10 1998
.5415 TAMIAM! TRAIL N., SUITE :320, NAPLES. FLORIDA ,34108 ["~'IONE: (941)598-1605 * FAX: (941)598-1773
I .~,~:~ ~1
HERB HASSON &O0*l PELICAN lAY AJ'T. 14,01 MAPLES. YL 3410l.~
As per you~' r~lue~'x, I am Usting tl~ fivu ~ tlxat [ would Item to mconnn~xl.
James. A Carroll
Giro D. Han~
Verx Tr~y
I
John 1iV. H,=y-t
Sun Trust Building
Suite $18
801 Laurel O,k Drive Naples. FL 33963
0ffics i941) 597.8989 Res (94T} 597-gS65 Fax {941} 591-2179
FEB ! 0
TO: ~rnes P. Wud
FROM: $.Ru~sel[ Mudge
DATE: Sanuary 5, 1998
SUBJECT: Advisory Boa,'*d Membership
My recommendations are:
David A. Roellig
Cornelia l~reigh
.lames A. Can'oll
Glen D. Harrell
Maureen McCarthy
Comments:
I submitted my request for consideration when I understood only a few had
applied. If it is determined that six qualified applicants submitted requests
you may remove my name from consideration,
I have greatly enjoyed our long association in working together over the past ten
yea~-s with the old (?) PBID Board of Supervisors as well as the Advisory Board.
I will always have an interest in providing any help if'needed.
AG£NDA,,..,T TEM
FEB ! 0 1998
Pg
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pelican Bay Advisory Committee
FROM: lames P. Waxd
DATE: December 31, 1997
SUIL~CT: Advisory Board Membership
In order to ensure that the Pelican Bay Set~iees Divisioa meets the r~tutoty tequiremeats relative to t~e Divi.~on's
recommen~don to the Board of County Commissioner's for appointment to the Advisor7 C, ommi~, the
follo~ng procedure is being recommended for utilization by the Advisory Committee. This proc~ure Im been
rvviexved and approved by the County Atlomey.
PROCEDURE: In order to obtain input from the exisling Advisory Committee for the ai:~ointmem of new
members, attached to this memorandum are copies of the r~a'umes received by the Board of Co~ty Comrttissioners.
They are as follows:
/'~...~ Da,,'id A. Roellig ,
Cornelia Kreigh .-..~'-'~"J
lames A. Carroll
,,_4 ~ I. Russell Mudge
~_~,' Glen D. Harrell
6. Maur~cn McCarthy
Each member is being a~ked to return to the Division's ofliee, by January 9, 1998 a list of five members who you
would like to see appointed to the Advisory Committee. '
Each recommendation r~rumed by the Advisory Member mu.~t be sent to the Division's afl'lee either by mail or by
fax and received in the Division's office on or before the date noted above. The recommendation must be si~;ned
by the Advisory Committee Member and will become a pan of the Division's Public Record~
Upon receipt of each member's r~'ommendationa, ~ will tabulate these m:ommendadons from tl~ Advi~ry
Committee and the five can~dates receiving the highest number of vote~ from this p~ will receive a
recommendation by s~ff, wh. ich will be forwarded on to the Board of County Commi~ioners for appointmeat to
the Advi~ry Committee.
It is important that each member em'ure that you do not lalk to each otl~t relative to the recommen~tio~ which
you will make to rattY. Please feel free to xvr~te any comments that you may have on your recommendatio~ for the
Advisory Committee.
There will be no £ormal discuasion by the Advisory Commillee at a meeting
Adciido~lly, it is important to recognize that the County Commiuion in its' le~s!._tive authority has the ability to
either accept or reject any recommendations of the Pelican Bay Servi(::~ Division and that thl) memorandma along
with a copy of the Advisory Committee's signed r~'ommendaLiOtti wiU be folxva/ded oil lo the ~ of Conaty
Commissioners and included in the backup material for their consideration.
l. fyou haw any quest/OhS relat/ve to this matter, please feel fxee to conta~ me.
FEB ! 0 1998
TOZ J~es P. Na~d
FROM: Anthony P. Pires, Jr.
DATE: Ja/~uary 6, 1998
Advisory Board Xambersb/p/Pelioan Bay
Services Division HSTU A~visory Board
Pursuant to the procedxlre outlined i~ your m~mox~Lr~hxm of
Dece~Lber 31, 1997 With regi3:d~ to Ac~v~ory Board M~_baxmh/p, the
following are m~ five proposed members who I would recommend to the
County Comm/ssion for appointment to the Advisory ~it~ae:
1. David A. Roelli.
2. James A. Carroll
3. J. PoAssel Kudge
4. Glen D. Harrell
5. Kaureen llcCarthy
If you have any furl:.he.r ~'uesl:.t.o~s, please do' not ,hesitata to
contact me.
AGENDA IT,[~
NO ._..?/_~L_
FEB 10 1995
I ' MEMORANDUM
TO: Pelican Bay Advisory Committee
FROM: James P. Waxd
DATE: December 31, 1997
SUIM'ECT: Ach, isory Board Mcm~rship
la order to ensure that the Pelican Bay Services Division ~ thc statutory r~quin, mcnts rclativ~ to tl~ Division's
recommendation to the Board of County Commissioner's for appointment to the Advisor./ Commi~ th~
following procedure is being recommended for utilization by th~ Advisory Committee..T?is p~ has been
reviewed and approved by the Cotmty Atlorney.
PROCEDURE: In order to obtain input from the e.xirdng Advisory Committee for tl~ appointme~ of
membe~ attached to this memorandum ar~ copies of the resumes received by the Board of County Commissioners.
They are as folloxvs:
David A. Roe[fig
2. Cornelia K.reigh
.lames A. Carroll
J'. Russell Mudge
Glen D. I-tarrell
Maureen McCarthy
Each member is being asked to return to the Divisio 8 a list offiv~ members who
would like to see appointed to the Advisory Committee.
Each recommendation returned by the Advisory Member mu.st be sent to the Division's olHce either by mail or by
fax and received in the Division's offico on or before the date noted above. Th~ recommendation must be signed
by the Advisory Committee Member and will become a part of the Division's Public Records,
Upon receipt of each member's r,~'ommendations, staff will tabulat~ thes~ r~,,-'ommendations from the Advisory
Committee and the five candidates receiving the kighest number of votes from this process will mc:eh~ a
recommendation by sla.ff, which will be forwarded on to the Board of County Commissioners for appointment to
th~ Ach'isory Committee.
It is important that each member ensure that you do not talk to each other r~lativ~ to the recommendations which
you will make to staff. Please feel free to write any comments that you may haw on your r~.ommendations for the
Advisory Committee.
There ~¥ill be no formal discussion by the Advisory Committee at a meeting.
Additionally, it is important to recognize that the County Commission in its' lcgislativ~ authority has tl~ ability to
either accept or reject any recommcndatiorts ofth~ Pelican Bay Services Division and that this memorandum
with a copy of the Advisory Committee's signed m:x)rnmendations will be forwarded on to t]~ Board of
Comrmssioncrs and included in the back-up material for their considoration.
If you have any questions relatixz to th. is matter, please feel free to contact me.. No.
FEB ! 0 I998
· V ALAN B. VARLEY, M.D.
January 3, 1998
Pelican Bay Services Division
In accor~.*,~e with the procedure outlined in yom'
12/31/97 memo, the foilowin~ are my nominations for
the five open positions on the P.B. MSTBU Adviso~
Board:
t. · David
~. Man~n M~
,.
Sincerely,
Alan B. Vtrley,
NO.
FEB 10 t998
Wemer Financial, Inc.
Wealth Aec,~-,ion ........ ~ ~ ~ lVum
'~----~~'-~ ~ 61~
December 31, 1997
To: /ames P. Wsrd
Pelican Bay Services Division
Fr: George Wemer
Re: Advisory Board Membership
After re~4ewing the applications attached to your memo dated December 31, 1997,
my recommendations for appointment to the Advisory Board ~re:
Cometia Kreigh
David A. Roellig
!ames A. Carroll
I. Russell Mudge
Glen D. Harrell
No
FEB 1 0 199B
(941) 591 - 2149
Secutitia Off~m~! ~ Calum & ~ ~ (941) $91 - 2179 fax
~ BERNON W. YOUNG ' ...
6760 Pelican Bay ~lvd. t334
Naples FIm,~~/o~
P,~one and Fax
("8~) 598-1785
1998
Pg
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 30, 1997
TO: James Ward, Pelican Bay Services Di~i~on
FROM: Sue Filson, Administrative Assi .~---~-"~
1
Board of County Commissioners~'
RE: Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee
As you know, we currently have 5 vacancies on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press
release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for
consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
David A. Roellig
6000 Pelican Bay Blvd., #204
Naples, FL 34108
Cornelia Kriegh
5964 Pelican Bay Boulevard
Naples, FL 34108
James A. Carroll I
8430 Abbington Circle, Unit C-31
Naples, FL 34108
J. Russell Mudge
16 Las Brisas Way
Naples, FL 34108
Glen D. Harrell
9589 Cresant Lake Drive, #202
Naples, FL 34109
Maureen McCarthy
6075 Pelican Bay Boulevard
Naples, FL 34108
Please let me know, in writing, the recommendatien for appointment of the advisory committee
w/th. in the 41 day time-frame, and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's
consfderation. Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions,
ArtacbanentsSFThank you for your attention to this matter. / ~[:[Bpqt. ~..._~ ~ [1 98 ~
December 26, I997
Ms. Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commissioners
3301 Tamiani Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
Dear Ms. Fi~son:
This is in response to the December 8, 1997 memorandum to the Pelican
-ga}' Advisory Tommit~ee from Mr. J*mes P. Ward concerning apDoinr_nent to
the Con~ittee.
i re~esc consideration by the Board of Cowry Co~issioners for an
appcintment ts this Cc~itCee. As re,ired, ! ~ a registered voter in
Collier County. Dr. Varley has given me a copy of the memorand~
mentioned above and
would be honored to encouraged me ~ apply for this apPoin~ent. I
perfo~,s fsr ~he serve and contribute to the work this ccm~ittee
Pe._~an Bay co~unlty and Collier
If any additional info~ation is needed, please call or write me.
erely,
id A. Roellig
6000 Pelican Bay Blvd. #204
Naples, Florida 34108
594-2210
FEB 1(398
N~r,e: D~;iD A. ROELLiG
B!rthpl/yr: Detroit, Michigan, March'lT, 1938
Education: B.S., Geology, Wayne State Unlver$1=y
Registration: Professional Geologist, Florida License # 729
Prior Experience:
May, 1966 to January, 1981. Detroit District, U.S. Corps of
Engineers, responsible for numerous coastal shoreline and navigation
studies many of which have been authorized and cons:rutted. Served as
Dis~r!c% CZM coordinator and on subcommittees of the international
Joint Coramission and the Great Lakes Basin Co~lssion.
January, 198i to September, 1990. Division Geologist for the
North Central Division, Corps of Engineers, Chicago, Illinois.
ProvtJed consul~atlcn and guldance in the fields of engineering geology
and coastal engineering to our subordinate district offices. The area
~f responsibility included the U.S. portion of the Great Lakes as well
as the Upper Mississippi River Basin. A/so served as the Division
Research and Development Coordinator and as a me~ber of the
international Joint Commission's Council of Great Lakes Research
Managers.
September, 1990 to May, 1994. Geologist for the Headquarters,
Ccr~s of Engineers, Dlrectorate of Civil Works, Washington D.C.
Provided engineering geology consultation to all elements of the Corps
of En;ineers. Technical proponent of geology related training courses.
Headquarters technical monitor of the Corps' Coastal Geology R&D.
Provlded guidance and oversight of civil works program development, and
execu[ion for a broad range of water resource and conservation
projec%s.
May, 1994 to present: Took an early retirement, perfor~led
volunteer work and relocated to Florida in mid-1996.
Professional Affiliation: Member, A~sociation of Engineering
Geologists, 1971 to present.
Address: 6000 Pelican Bay Blvd., #204, Naples, Florida 34108
Telephone: (941) 594-2210
AGENDA IT~
.o.
FEB 1 0 1996
Cornelia Kriegh
5964 Pelican Bay Boulevard
Naples, Florida 34108
December 22, 1997
Board of County Commissioners
Attention: Mrs. Sue Filson
3301Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
Dear Mrs. Filson,
I am interested in being appointed to the Pelican Bay MSTBU
Advisory Committee. I have enclosed a resume which is current
up to 1992. At that time I moved to Florida, retired, and
now a full-time resident of Pelican Bay.
I am an officer of the Pelican Bay Women's League and am
therefor in touch with the thoughts of our more than 800
members concerning the future of Pelican Bay and Collier County.
I believe that I would be a valuable member of this committee.
I appreciate your consideration.
Sincerely,
Cornelia Kriegh
CORNELIA F. KRIEGH
42 Mor~on Drive
Ramsey, New Jersey 07446
201-327-2488
EDUCATION: B.A. Literature Ramapo College 1983
GPA - 3.8
Dean's List - every year
Honors Program - par~lcipant
Preparatory School National Cathedral School
HISTORY: INLINGUA SCHOOL OF LANGUAGES 1986 - present
Assistant Director
Total responsibility for day-to-day operations=
'-Interview
-Screen corporate sponsors, perform liason
-Telemarket services and special programs
-Organize and host receptions and seminars
-Prepare and present proposals
-Recruit and monitor over 20 professionals
and staff
-Develop and improve ~ommunication
-Maintain quality service and cost
-Implement cost effective operation
-Write and place advertising
-Research competition
-Negotiate terms, compensation and special programs
-Schedule students, professionals, receptions and
special events
-Establish and maintain operation controls
-Initiate appropriate services
Previous assignments include Public Relations
Assistant, Office Manager and Personnel Assistant with
Bell Laboratories and Englewood Hospital
PERSONAL: Interests include family, co~munications and travel
No
· FEB
Pg -~__ Pg"
BOARB OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ,. ~--:12118/97 ...:~:. ~ ~--.~.,.~.
3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST
NAPLES, FL 34112
ATTENTION: MRS SUE FILSON, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISSTANT
DEAR MRS FILSON
I would like to apply for membership on the Municipal Service
Taxing Benefit Unit (MSTBU) Advisory Committee. I have lived in
Pelican Bay for over 12 years, have been a property owner since 1987
and have a real interest in seeing this fine community prosper. I believe
my skills and experience can be put to use to help make this happen.
Attached is a recent Resume which reviews my background.
Thanl:s for giving me consideration.
James A. Carroll
8430 Abbington Circle Unit C-31
Naples FL, 34108
RESUME
James A Carroll 9/25/97
Residence: 8430 Abbington Circle Unit C31 Naples FI, 34108 Tel 941 $97 9767
Date of Birth: 11/20/21
College: Illinois Institute of Technology
Degree: BS in Mechanical Engineering October, 1943
Wife's Name: DeEida
Married: October 20, 1943
Children: 3 children
7 Grand Children
Military Service: US Navy Engineering Officer 1944/1945
Business Affiliations: Procter & Gamble Co 1945-1982
Manager of Corporate Engineering Division '67to' 82
Retired- 1982
Other Business Affiliations: President - Southwestern Ohio Water Co 75-82
Consultant with Braxton Management Consultants - Boston MA
Local and National Civic Activities:
CommiXtee Chairman and District Vice Chair, Boy Scouts of America
United Way - Many Positions
Advisory Committee- Wyoming School Board
Riverfront Advisory. Committee Chairman {1977 to 198'/) Ci~' of Cincinnati
City of Cincinnati Infrastructure Task Force (1986 to 1988)
President Reagan's Grace Commission on Cost Reduction-Washington-1982
Profes.~ioaal Asao~iations:
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Engineering Society of Cincinnati
Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Ohio
Leadership Collier - Masters Program
Condominimum Experience:
Grosvenor Condominium of Pelican Bay- Board Member- 4 yea~
- President - 3 years
Crescent Condomlnimum - 'I'rcasar~r - 6 months
Clubs:
Birchwood Country Club - Harbor Springs, Michigan
Quail Creek Country Club - Naples, FI
- Board member 92-96
-President 94-96
Forum Club- Member 1992
- Board Member 1995,1996,1997
FEB
RE, CF_.!V'ED
O J. Russell Mudge ,. -
Nnples FL. 3410~..8;Z16
-~'
December 1 g, 1997
Mrs. Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant,
Board of County Commissioners
3301 East Tamiami Trail
Naples, Florida 34112..4977
Subject: Pelican Bay MST&BU Advisory Committee
Dear Mrs. Filson:
I have enjoyed serving on both the Pelican Bay Board of Supervisors
of the Pelican Bay Improvement District and the Pelican Bay MST&BU
Advisory Committee. I would like to be considered for another term and
have enclosed an updated resume.
Sincerely,
J. Russell Mudge
cc: James P.Ward PBSD
pbmsmbu.l~'
AGENDA~ ,JkTF,~ A G_.~.~~
FEB 1 0 1998 1998
Pg .~
(
RESUME OF APPLICANT FOR REAPPOINTMENT TO
PELICAN BAY MST&BU ADVISORY CO~E
Name: J. Russell Mudge Naples properw owner since 1971
Ad.ess: 16 Las Brisas Way Full time resident from 1980
Naples, FL. 34108 Pelican Bay resident since 1985
Birth date: 1/5~0
Married: Doro~y (Grant) 1941 deceased 199"/, 3 sons
Graduate of Glen Cove High School, Glen Cove, Long Island` New York 1937
BS degree, Hotel Administration, Comell University 1941
Worked surm'ners in hotels while in college
Har~'ard Business School, Advanced Management Program 1967
C~_areer: 40 years with General Electric Company - s~"~ed on GE Business Training
Program in 1941 - Bridgepor~ CT.
1941-45 Accounting & financial positions - GE Appliance & Merchandise Dept,
Bridgeport, CT.
1946-49 Works Accoun~n~, GE Housewares Plant, Allenlown, PA.
1949-53 GE Traveling Auditors Stuff, senior auditor, supervising auditor, Schenec~ty, NY
1953-5g Manager-Finance & Employee Relations, GE Appliance Controls Dept. Morrison IL.
198g-6~ General Manager, GE Appli~ce Motor DepL - Dek~lb IL. & Murfi'eesboro. TN.
1964-66 Manager-GE International Business Development Operation, NYC, NY.
Overseas acquisitions & dispositions.
1966-77 GE Vice President - General Manager Afl'ica, Asia~ Far East & Pacific Operations.
1977-80 GE Vice President - Corporate Operating Services, Fairfield, CT. Corporate
Purchasing, Transportation, Telecommunications, Information l:Yocessing,
Real Estate & Construction Operations.
1977-80 Member-GE Pension Board.
4/1/80 Retired
]~elican Bay Activities:
1985-91 Board member-Las Brisas Neighborhood Association. President 1988-91.
1988-95 Board member Pelican B~y ~openy Owners Associauion. Vice l~'esident 1992-9"/.
1988-91 Pelican Bay Improvement Disu'ict Board of'Supervisors, Treasurer 1990-91.
1991-97 Pelican Bay MST&BU Advisory Comminee. Vice Chairman 1992,93,96 Chah'man 94-95.
pbrnstbu.doc
WATER IDE
RECEIVED
December 18, 1997
9EC 13
Mrs. Sue Filson "'
Administrative Assistant
Board ot' County Commissioners
3302 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
~: Pelican Bay M~BU Adviso~ Committee
Dear Mrs. Filson:
Attached you will find an updated resume. Please accept the attachment and
this letter as a request for reappointment to the MSTBU Advisory. Committee.
It has been my pleasure and honor to serve for the past four years, together
with a distinguished and dedicated board serving the residents, as well as,
commercial interests of Pelican Bay. My commitment to Pelican Bay and to
waterside Shops is long-term, and I feel my insight toward the proper blend of
residential, as well as commercial needs, can provide a good balance to the
make-up of the board.
If you have any questions regarding my request for reappointment, please feel
free to call.
Sincer,,ely/
'General Manager
ccg/
attachment
CC: James P. Ward
AG£ NDA~ .[,,TEI~
FEB 10 1998
5415 TANIIAMI TRArL N., SUITE 320, ~APLES. FLORID, _ _ -~,,
Clarion Realty_ Services
Biography
Glen D. Harrell
Mr. Harrell is the General Manager of Waterside Shops at Pelican Bay in
Naples, Florida which is managed by Clarion Panner's aftiliated management
company, Clarion Realty Services. CPS provides property management, leasing
and marketing for the 250,000 square foot Waterside Shops at Pelican Bay ~
high-end specialty center. Mr. Harrell has managed Waterside Shops since it's
opening in 1992 and joined CPS in 1995. Mr. Harrell has over 17 years of
shopping center management experience.
Prior Experience:
Courtelis Company, Miami, Florida, Project Manager for the development of
Waterside Shops. Coordinated the firm's development and leasing of Waterside
Shops and on-site coordination of all tenant construction
(1992-1995)
The J.C. Nichols Company, Kansas City, Missouri; Vice President ,' General
Manager Retail Development responsible for the leasing and development of a
proposed 1.5 million square foot mixed use center in St. Petersburg, Florida.
(1989-1992)
A.E. LaPage; Toronto, Canada, General Manager, responsible lbr the property
management services of a 250,000 square ibot high-end retail center, Old Hyde
Park village, in Tampa, Florida.
(1985-1989])
Corporate Property Investors: Assistant Manager and Marketing Director in
Florida and New Jersey regional shopping centers for Pembroke Management.
(1981-1985)
Eat uc a tio n :
Bachelor of Arts in Mass Communications, University of South Florida, 1975
Affiliations..
International Council of Shopping Centers
Certified Shopping Center Manager 1988
Certified Marketing Director 1989 Ae,;~m~I-~M' M --
Licensed Real Estate Broker, State of Florida
FEB 1 0 1998
MA~F~ McCARTHY
The Dorchester- Apt. ~01
607~ Pelkaa Bay Boulev~'d
Neple~ Florida 34108
(941) ~9g.38S?
la'~: (9~1) 566.2483
December 17, 1 ~97
Ms. Sue lrd~on
Admiais~ve Assimat
Cotli~ County Oovermnent
By Fax: 774-3602
Dear Sue:
I would be interested in ~rving on the MSTBU (Pelican Bay Advisory
Committee). I presently ~it on the EPTAB Advisory Board, u you may recall. I en
recen~ ~etired fi'om ~ Ion8 career in ~rrior manasement of'financial ~ and r~n my
own consulting business for ei~,ht years, specializ~ bi customer service alld qua~. l
live in PeLican Bay ~d am very involved i~ my commmgty. My husba, lxl and I Ire full-
been here for a~most sevea yeah.
:~me
residents
have
I beliewe my active use of Pelican Bay facilities, my si:ton8 business blclqiround,
my present service as an Adviso~ Board member, as well M my energy level, would mike
me sva. lu~le contributor to the Pelican Bay Advisory Committee
I enclose an outd~tecl copy of my resume aAd would welcome ~y questions you
or the Board might !uve. Thaz~ you so mu~ for your courtesy.
Sincerely,
FEB 10 1998
MAUREEN D. McCARTHY
~dYT$ Pdlcan B~y Book. ltd # ~01
(941) $98 35~7
SUMMARY:
P.e~lts. oriented ~ecutive with proven track record h'~ retail s~Mce/quality, Mles management,
marketing and product development. Outstanding coach who builds strong team to accomplish
go~ls,
RECENT EMPLOYMENT F.,X.PKRrI~.NCE:
April 1994 - Scandia Down ShOl~, Ltd,
July 1995 Vice President - Down and Feather
Full resporttibility for the down nad f'e~ther business for Mgh-end specialty retail
franchJ$or with 25 shops and down and feather as. les in excess of $10MM.
l~.espomible for ;.11 product development and product man~ernent, customer
~rvir.~., quality tad competitive studies,
Ir~roduced several ta~ique products to the market inc~di~g t~ country's first down
~d feather featherbed, which resulted in a 65% increa.~ in featlm4:~ sa~es.
Reduced quality control problems by 95% in · five-month period through a~ve
management tad Lracking
Conducted sm. lyses throoghout the franchisee network which shovmd that the down
tad f'~ business ,.vts the one aspect ofthe business wl~ch worked perfect~.
. Reor~ ~xl rationali.z~ product pricing to meet e, ompetition, improv~ market
coverage and enh.~ce product differenti&tion.
CONSULTING/INTE~ MANAG£M'~NT F-.XPI:RIENCE: 1988 To 1~4
Hired by Hanover Direct, Inc. to evaluate the 25-member fi'anehis~ operation oF t[~
Scandia Down Comply, a rece. m acquisition. In addition to visiting with at~d interviewing
to fr~¢hising. During tn e~$ht month period was actively involved in the day-to.day rnanagenm~t
o£the fr~cMse lms~ness. Subsequently n~otiated a joint ventur~ licen.~g arranger, sourc~
the venture pn. rtner, dev~oped the structur~ of'the a$reernent ~ worked with the new partner in
s~tting up the ~ne~ tad introducing it a.,~d the new licensing format to the former franchisees.
At The Dime Savings Bank of New York, directed proje~,'t to improv~ m'vic~quality in
back.off:ice support deptrtrnent:. Reporting to EVP, identified trea~ needi~ improvement and
developed department-by=department pla.,~ to create a truly ~stomer-first environment. Working
with Dep~.~trnent Heads, identified impediments to internal ,.'ustomer service, an~ dirked crc~s-
functiort~l team~ in developing solutions and action plans to solve Imsin~sa problems. Identified
empowecment as the major developrnentsl need to
re-~ctive to a pro-activ~ re~portse to customer need
.:2-
At Cha~e Manhattnn Bank, r~laced Vice President in chargo ofProduct !~ of
Visa nncl M&stcrCsrd Clinic Cmls. Managed product managers responm'ble for incrused ca~ usage,
increased purcha~ usage and attrition reduction. Worked with Customer $etvi~ Systena Lad
testing.
At Citilumk, r~ptar..od a s~ries ofoflicers in various credit product d~ndopng~ m. Ran
n~w product m~%, h~troduced produ,-'t enhtacements and c~rdinaled ~ ~ nttio~l
e~orts.
PKIOR E~NLPLOYM~NT HLSTORY:
1988 Chemica] Bank, New York
Vice President and Market Manager
Directed all retail bsnlcin8 and community lending ~'tiviti~ in Roe. kl$~ County
end lower Wcstchestcr. Responsible ~or 12 branches with ffabiFfl~ balances of
S700MJVL, operating budget of S2MM and 130 people.
Msnagcd zll mtrketing activities and oversaw ~etmtive derrvery 0oln cemel~
ATM'a ~ Corporate sa. les).
Brought Rockland County from last place in ~ale~ (out of Mx regions) to first
place in eight weeks.
lncr~ uset sales by L50% in six mernths.
Re-¢onfigtu'ed organization to increue s~les sta~ by 15-2CP/i without increasing
head count.
Increased sales per client contact ~om 1.8 to 2.9 in seven mtrd~.
Oversaw introduction of ATM technology into Rocidud County, from instillation
to loc, si marketing phue.
1987 - 1988 Amerkan Savinp Bank, New York
Senior Vice IPrelident - Retail Baaldug and Operatloiu
Directed ill retail banking Lad central operatiotu function for S4 billion thrift with
34 branches in six. county metropolitan Irea. Controlled S25MM opetzting budget
tad & stsff'in excess of 600 people.
Active member of Bank's Senior Mzna8enem Committee.
Developed pro-active sa. les culture which inc, reesed crossqell ratio from 1.2 to 2.8.
Develop~ Lad implemented ia/es ~ainin8 program rolled out to 400 ~tl~.
Started a triage fimction to ensure that wilk-in traffic was landled quickly
profitably by the right person.
Opened three mortgage c, eaten (the Bank's tim), Lad directed the clevelopmem ora
computerized a.l~lic, ation tracking system to etlable the mortgage edle~t to be cormamly
in touch with the status of his application.
Introduced shopper survey~ to ensure add No
Set up sales utc, king program.
FE8 1 0 1998
Pg · ~.._~~
1981. 1987 Citicorp/Citibank. l~.,w York
Vice l~uident
InternfltionoJ l~rivate Bank 1984-1987
Vice Pre, dent and IXrector of Mark~n8 Support, r~:)orua'ble for product develop,no~,
produc: management, market research, advertising, training and clierg protocol.
Active member of Senior Management Con,.m~ee.
Do,-cloped thc Bank's first overnight deposit ~:count in multi-currencie~ bringing in
~SM~ Ln the first month. Subs~uently 'sold" this ptoducl to otbcr Citicorp entities.
Prcscndy offered in ail domestic branches.
· Ir~ti,-ted ~nd developed the wholesa~g o£addhiora] producu to other Citicorp entities,
resulting in addition~ revenues of $3M~.
· DLrcctecl dcvelopment of'major uIes management program which became prototype
t~'oughoui other internationaJ banking ccntcrs.
New York Banldag Dhdston 1981-1984
Vice President in charge of Madison Avenue/42 Street Branch. $350MIVI business
with 65 employees.
Succes~uily turned business around to become · leading peffo~ in Upper
Manhattan Division. Consistently recognized with bonus ~nd stock options.
Established B~k's first Leg~! Center, bringing in 43 new law firm clients in e~ght
month~.
Set up Exccutive Bankin8 Progra,-n for major Fortune $00 company, resultin8 in
$TMM in new liability balances in first three months.
In~ca. sed branch's oventll liabLlity b~dLnces by 48% in one ye~.
1973 - 1981 United Jerse7 Ban~, Princetoo, New Jersey
~g~ years ~n v~ocs member bank (The Fir~ National Ba~,k of Princeton) and holding
compaq, fy positions. A~ First NationaJ, a.Rer holding lending and account man~cment
positions, was promoted to Director of Mazkcting and Public Relations. Sub~quently
tra.ns£crred to U,1B Marketing Depa~"Lment M Director of Commurdcations.
EDUCATION:
B.S. State Univermity of New York (SUNY)
University of Colorado, Bank Marketing As~.iafion's Grnduale School of Bank
FELx lb 1998
Pg '-4~-~
,co t. CO COD
BO~ - NOR~ '. ; ~ d.'-~.:. ..~ · '..-" · .
~: To ~ppoint 2 mcm~ to s~e 3 ye~ t~m, e~8 on Feb~ 14, 2001, on
· ~ Coljicr Co~ Code E~orc~m~nt Bo~d - No~.
CONSIDE~T!O~: ~s 7 m~m~r (2 ~t~t~ m~r) ~d is com~s~d of, but ~ot
limited to, individ~s rcpr~s~t~g ~ ~cupa~o~ of~c~t~ b~bmm~ engbeer, ~en~
con~c~or, su~on~actor ~d Re~tor ~d ~ co.idled, ~ p~ oo ~e b~is ofex~dence or
~tcr~s~ in ~c ~c~ of ~c codes ~d or~c~s to ~ ~o~ed. Mem~ ~ ~q~d to file a
Fo~ 1 S~tcmcnt of Fin~ci~ Interest each y~ ~ ~e S~mr ofEl~o~. T~-~ ~ 3
~ te~s for C~li~ E~en Dei~ (A~omey) ~d ~c~ H~ M~o~ck ~n~eer) ~
Dyrel Delaney (Realtor) 2 yea
Roberta Dusek (Realtor)
Clifford Wesley Flegal, Jr. (Alternate-Realtor) 1 yea
Mr. Flegal is currently serving as an alternate and would like to be considered for appointment as
a regular member. If Mr. Flegal is appointed as a regular member, you will need to appoint 1
additional regular member and I alternate member.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION_: Quasi-Judicial - No recommenctations accepted. All
members meet the minimum requi~ments and are eligible for appointment.
.FISCAL IMPAC'~: NONE
GROWTH MANAGEM~ENT IMPACT_: NONE
RECOMME.NDATIO~: That the Board of County Commissione~ consider the
recommendation for appointment and appoint members to serve on the Collier Code
Enforcement Board - North. and direct the County Attorney to prepare a resolution confirming
the appointments.
Prepared By: Sue Filson, Adminisu--ative Assistant
Board of' County Commissioners ,~G-E-N0~--
Agenda Date: FEBRUARY 10, 1998 No._../~/')
FEB 1 0 1998
Pg-. /
Collier County Code Enforcement Board - North
Work Pkone ~ppt'd Exp. Dat~ :Term
Name Home Phone ~a:e~appt 2ndK~pDate
~33 E. ~bm C~le
Naples, FL 34103
Cat~: ~~A~~ess Co~t
George P. Ponte 0~18/97 0~1~ 3 Ye~
565 Aura Boulev~ Ap~ 7~1370
Na~les, FL 34113
D~t: I
Ca~e~o~: ~e~ed CBS Employee
Celi~ Ellen Dei~ C'~5~-41 4~w~ ~18/9S 0~I~98 3 Ye~
913 8 W~ter View ~ve
Naples, FL 34109
D~ict: 3
Category: Anomey
$~es D. ~em Sr. ~~ 03/I~93 0~14/96 3 Ye~
116 Heron Av~ue 79~893 ~96 0~1~99 3 Y~
D~ct: Naples, FL 34108 2
C~ego~: Gene~ Con--mr
Cl~ord Wesley Flegfl, Jr. 06/03/97 0~14/~ 3
292 B~ol ~ve
Naples, FL 34113
D~mZt: 1
C~ego~: ~~A~efltor
M~ya Lcu~ere ~/19/94 0~I~7 3
5780 1~ Avenue, S.W. 35~ ~1~97 0~1~ 3
Naples, FL 34116
D~: 3
C~ego~: B~
F~d Mueg~ 281-1~1 ~I~ ~1~ 3 Y~
765 W~ow B~ok ~ve, ~15
N~I~, FL 34108
D~: 2
C~o~: R~tor
AG£ND.~ ~TE~N
FEB 10 1998
~/ork Phone
No~ Ho~ ~hone D~~pt 2n~D~e 2nd
~c~ H~y McC~ek.
725 I0~ Avenue, N.
Naples, FL 34108 ,~-~
D~ict: 2
Catego~: Eng~
C~les M. ~~ 03~89 0~1~ I Ye~
5960 C~re~ Hollow Way 507-~a ~95 0~I~ 3 Y~
Naples, FL 34109
D~Zt: 3
C~ego~: Re~tor
This 7 member board was created pursuant to Chapter 162 oflhe FL Stat. by Ordinance 88-89
and ia composed of. but not limited to, individuals mpmsenUng the occupations of architact.
businassman, engineer, general contractor, subcontractor and Realtor and am considered, in
part, on the basis of experience or interest in fe ames of fie codes and ordinlnce$ to be
enforced. Members are required to file a Form I Statement of Financial Interest each year wftll
the Supervisor of Elections. Terms are 3 years. This is a Quasi Judicial Board. Two alternate
membem were approved by Ord. 96-78 on 12J3/96.
Staff: Maria Cruz, Code Enforcement Specialist: 643-8455
04, 1997
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 27, 1995
TO: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commissioners
FROM:Maria Cruz. Licensing Compliance Officer ~
Code Enforcement Depaz~nent
RE: Candidates for Code Enforcement Board "North"
The -~r~ached resumes were reviewed, these individuals meet the Code Enforcement Boa~ Ordinance No.
92-80, general classification requirements.
CATEGORY
Dyrel Delaney Realtor
Roberta Dusek Realtor
If you any further assistance, please advise.
need
Maria
-~rtachments
FEB 10 1998
Pg", /~
DATE: January21, 1998 -- ". "'~ "'"
· ::: tS
TO: Vinell Hills, Elections Office t~ ""' ~';'
FROM: _Sue Filson, Administrative A.~irtan
Board of County Commissioners ~ '
RE: Voter Registration - Advisory Board AppoLntments
The Board of County Commissioners will soon consicler the following indiv/duals for
appointment to one of thc county's advisory committees. Plt'a~se let me know ifthos~ listed
below are registered voters in Collier County.
Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides.
C_Q~E ENFORCEMENT BOARD~_ COMMISSION DISTRICT~
Dyrel Dclaney
427 Heron Avenue
Roberta Dusek
1635 Windy Pines Drive /
Naples, FL 34112 U(~
Thank you for your help.
AGE ND./A~.~ T~M
NO
FEB 10
pg. ~'
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January21, 1998
TO: LiMa Sullivan, Code Enforcement ~Direc~
·
FROM: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistan~ "1
Board of County Commissioners
RE: Code Enforcement Board North and South
As you know, we cu_~Tently have 4 vacancies on the above-referenced advisory committee. A press
release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on ti'ds committee to submit a resume; for
consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows:
Dyrel Delaney
427 Heron Avenue
Naples, FL 34108
Roberta Dusek
1635 Windy Pines Drive
Naples, FL 34112
Please let me know, in writing, if the applicants are qualified to serve on the board within the 41 day
time-frame, ~d I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Please
categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. Ifyou have any questions, please call me at
774-8097.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SF
Attachments
January 4, 1998
Sue Filson
Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commissioners
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, FL 34112
Dear Mrs. Filson,
Re: Position on Committee of Code Enforcement Board (North)
Pursuant to your press release dated December 30, 1997,
hereby request that I be considered to fill a seat on the subject
Committee. I first came to Florida in 1971 as the Senior Real
Estate appraiser for the Everglades National Park in a progra~
which purchase wet land for a twenty million ($20,000,000.00)
expansion program.
In 1975 I moved to Naples and became the Chief Appraiser for
the United States National Park Service in the newly designat~d
Big Cypress National Preserve. From 1975 until 1980 I was lead
instrumental in the acquisition of over one hundred million
dollars ($100,000,000.00) in wet lands; a significant portion
there of being by the process of Eminent Domain. During that time
frame I endured the pressure of unbelievable outcries that the
United States Government had become a dictatorship and was
stealing private land without the payment of just compensation.
Letters in number from United States Congressmen were a daily
occurrence.
New... some twenty years later the program is viewed on a
National and even International lev-1 as one of the greatest
endeavors ever to have taken place toward the preservation of our
environment.
The point being that Naples is still in the throes of growing
pains. I want to provide my contribution towards it becoming a
world class City in rank with San Francisco, Paris or Venice and
not drift into a pattern of sprawling urban blight. The residence
of Collier County collectively have decreed they also wish to
maintain these high standards. In my estimation such level ca;~
only come if our Codes and Ordinances are steadfastly enforced
and the Department of Code Enforcement is giving strong backing;
a formula which is painful during the process but yielding in the
long run. If I am selected to set on the Board these are the
influences which I will bring with me.
I request that you respectfully submit this letter and my
attached r~sume to the Board of County Commissioners for their
consideration and action. I am available at any time to provide
additional information or answer any questions.
spectfu~ly submitted,
enclosures: Oyrel Oelaney r~sume
Dvrel DelaneY
427 Heron Ave., Naples, FL, 34108 (941) 594-1783
Naples First Residence: 1975 to 1980
(Interim: Washington, D.C. and other government post)
Naples Second Residence: 1991 to present
Profession: Real Estate Appraiser/ Writer
Education: Bachelors Degree
Major: Banking and Finance
Experience Pertinent to Collier County:
Chief Appraiser, United States National Park Service, mandated
to the acquisition of all inholdings within the boundaries of Big
Cypress National Preserve.
Credentials:
Certified as an expert witness in both Federal and State Courts
in matters of Eminent Domain. Pertinent to the seat on the
subject Board are my working knowledge of such value influencing
matters as projected growth, building and zoning codes, land
utilization, community standards, and community image.
,oo ,,. ,.-~ ,..,,
FEB 10 1998
December 28, 1997
Mrs. Sue Filson
Administrative Assistant
Board of County Commissioners
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, FL 34112
Dear Ms. Filson,
Re: The Collier County Code Enforcement Board
Even though I spent a number ofyears living in other areas on the
northeast coast of the United States, Florida has always been my home. 1
am a native Floridian. I was born here. I went to school here.
I4/herever I have lived it has atways been my philosophy to give back to
my community and land development and code enforcement have been my
strongest interest.
· Real Estate has been myprofessionfor the past seventeen fl 7} yearx.
Presently 1 am a broker sales associate with Cameron Real Estate Service&
Inc. I have no political connections in Collier County; I'm just a dedicated
citizen who has an interest and would very much like the opportunity to
serve.
$incere ,,~
AGENDA. ITEI~ Roberta (Bobb(e). Dusek,,
FEB 10 1998
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
ROBERTA (BOBBLE) DUSEK
941-261-1111 941-774-2428
REAL ESTATE BROKER/P~EGA! .
Licensed Real Estate Broker - State of Florida
Licensed Real Estate Broker - State of New York
Licensed Real Estate Broker - State of Pennsylvania
Over seventeen years of experience
National Paralegal Certification - graduated "With Distinction"
Former Florida and New York school teacher
EDUCATION
B.S. Degree in Education, Florida State. University; C.W. Post College, L.I.,
NY(continuing education); Westchester Community College, Westchester,
NY(real estate broker's course); Mercy College, Westchester, NY (Paralegal
National Certification recognized by the ABA ).
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS & DESIGNATIONS
NAR - National Association of Realtors
FAR - Florida Association of Realtors
NABOR - Naples Area Board of Realtors
GRI - Graduate Realtors Institute
CRS - Certified Residential Specialist AGEND~.~.~T. EM
RS Council - Residential Sales Council No
FEI t 0
A NATIVE FLORIT')IAN- P~'~
October 24, 1997
Board of County Commissioners
Collier County
Collier Government Complex
Naples, Florida 34112
Attention: Sue Filson
RE: Code Enforcement Board - North
I am submitting this request for consideration for a permanent position on the Collier County
Code Enforcement Board - North. I am currently serving as an alternate member on this Boaxd. I
have not missed a meeting since being appointed as an altemate and believe that it is impommt to
serve ones' commtmity.
Thank you for your consideration. ~
Regard,i,
/ /
Clifford Wesley Flegal Jr.
FEB 10 1998
December 10, 19'9?
Ms. Su(; Filson
Administrative Assistant
Collier County Government Complex
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples,, Florida 34112
Re: Collier County Code Enforcement Board
Dear Ms. Filson:
I respectfully submit my resignation to the Collier County Code Enforcement Board. Due to an
employment chtunge, I am no longer residing in Collier County. I appreciate the opportunity to
serve Collier County provided to me by the Board of County Commissioners.
If you have any questions, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN, INC.
Richard H. McCormick, P.E. .
RHNgkrg
mccormi,;k'~ fl 210.let
RICHMAN, DEIFIK, LANIER AND ROSS
A PROFESSIONAL A$~3CIATION
Kenneth W. Richman, Jr. ' Poinciana Professions! ]
Celia Etlen Deifik ' 2640 Golden Gaxe Park
Suza.nne D. Lanier Suite 206
Donald I4= Ross, Jr, ~ Naples, Florida 3.3942-2
(941) 4.34-77OO
, ~ c. run. a,~ ~ Telefax (941) 434-734
a Mast. of Lzw t.,
October 16, 1997
Ms. Sue Fil~n
Administrative Assistant
Roard of County Commissioners
.J01 Tamlami Trail East
Naples, Florida 34112
Dear Sue:
This 1¢'_:¢r is to advise that I will not be able to renew reappointment ofmy seat on the Code
Enforcement Board. I have made obligations to other public .~nvice activitie~ which prevent me from
sit'~g on the Code Enforcement Board.
Tl~nl~ you for your time and attemion.
vm, trub your~
RICHMA.N, DEIFI~ LANIER & ROSS, P.A.
CED:jcta
i^G£,o,~j.~'~_ ' RECEIVED
No._/_~./,-.- OCT 2 0 ~
(' FEi 1 0 1998 Bo d of' Count~ ComfsSfoners
_ _Pg ~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PETITION NO. PUD-97-12, WILLIAM L. HOOVER, OF HOOVER PLANNING SHOPPE
REPRESENTING FRANK CLESEN AND SONS INC., REQUESTING A REZO~ FROM "E"
ESTATES TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE
NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE PINE RIDGE ROAD (CR-896) AND 1-75 INTERCHANGE
ACTIVITY CENTER, LOCATED ON TRACT 92, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 35, SECTION
7, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF
APPROXIMATELY 4.33 ACRES.
OBJECTIVE:
This petition seeks to rezone the subject property from "E" Estates to "PUD" Planned Unit
Development for a commercial and professional office center.
The subject property is located within the Urban Designated Interchange Activity Center area of the
Future Land Use Map to the FLUE to the GMP. The PUD Document includes a mixture of
commercial uses including eating places, banks, hotels/motels, retail, professional and medical offices.
Convenience stores and gasoline service stations are prohibited. The PUD Master Plan pro'v/des three
land use parcels ',n-site, two for commercial development and one for water management. The
purpose for each parcel (A, B & C) is to provide a transition between uses and the residential
conm~unity to the north. For example, in Area A (.55 acres) the proposed uses include open space and
storm water management. This area was specifically located adjacent to Livingston Woods Lane
which abuts the residential neighborhood. Within Area A the petitioner is also constructing an opaque
eight (8) foot high architecturally designed masonary wall within the landscape buffer, across the rear
yard adjacent to Livingston Woods Lane. In Area B (1.88 acres) uses permitted are limited to
hotels/motels, miscellaneous retail, sit-down restaurants, health s~.r'~'ices, banks and professional
offices. Building heights are limited to thirty-five (35) feet and required to be setback a minimum of
eight-two and V2 feet (82.5) from Livingston Woods Lane. In Area C (1.67 acres) auto supply stores,
fast food restaurants and all permirted principal uses in Area B are permitted. As a result, the project
transitions from open space in the rear yard adjacent to Livingston Woods Lane to restricted
commercial uses, building heights and development regulations adjacent to Pine Ridge Road. These
building heights and restricted land uses are also similar to the approved Naples Gateway PUD and the
Angileri PUD to the west. The only exception is that the Angileri PUD allows gasoline service
stations and convenience stores; the maximum height for hotels/motels is limited to two (2) stories and
the remainder of the commercial buildings are limited to thirty (30) feet, and required to be setback
ninety (90) feet from Livingston Woods Lane. The Naples Gateway PUD also prohibits gasoline
services stations and convenience stores; the maximum height for commercial buildings including
hotels/motels is thirty-five (35) feet and the setback from Livingston Woods Lame is fifty feet for one
story buildings and ninety feet for two and three story buildings.
FEB 1 0 1998
Access to the subject site is provided from an existing east/west sixty (60) foot Hght-of-way casement
thru Tract 77 (located adjacent to and west of the subject site) connecting to a north/south sixty (60)
foot right-of-way easement intersecting with Pine Ridge Road at the existing median opening at the
Sutherland PUD entrance. These right-of-way easements are recorded in the Official Record Book
245, Page 521. The shared access connection to Pine Ridge Road is encouraged and deemed consistent
with the County's Interchange Activity Center Access Management Plan. A shared access agreement
between the owner(s) of Tract 77 and the subject petitioner is not currently executed, however, the
owner(s) of Tract 77 submitted a PUD rezone (Petition No. PUD-97-17 Pine Ridge Comers PUD)
presently being reviewed by staff, which provides identical right, of-ways and vehicular interconnects
with the subject PUD.
The PUD Master Plan provides a private forty (40) foot frontage road through the middle of the site for
access to Areas B and C which also functions as an interconnect to property east of the subject site also
located within the Interchange Activity Center. This frontage road is identical to the frontage road
approved in the Angileri PUD. Access to Livingston Woods Lane is prohibited.
The Master Plan also provides internal and perimeter landscape buffers, water management facilities,
open space, controlled ingress/egress and water and sewer facilities.
The subject property is surrounded on two sides (east and west) by the Interchange Activity Center.
These properties are presently undeveloped and zoned Estates. The property to the west (Tract 77) is
being reviewed for~. similar commercial center (Petition No. PUD-97-17 Pine Ridge Comers PUD).
Property to ,the north, across Livingston Woods Lane, is zoned Estates and is being developed with
single fanfily houses on 2.25 acre lots. Property to the south, across Pine Ridge Road is developed
with hotel/motels, restaurants, gasoline services stations and convenience stores, also referred to as the
Sutherland PUD.
The Collier County Planning Commission reviewed this petition on January 15, 1998 at their public
heating and recmnmended approval of the subject petition (8 to 0). During the public hearing no one
spoke in opposition or in favor of the petition. Additionally, staffhas not received any correspondence
objecting to the petition.
CONSIDEILa, TIONS'
All rezoning actions require a findings on the part of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC)
based on the provisions of Section 2.7.2.5. A preponderance of the rezone finding support an action to
rezone the subject lands to the "PLrD" zoning district. The rezone findings are formatted to give both
reasons for or against a decision to rezone the property. Said findings are included in this Executive
Summary submission together with the staffreport which is approved by the CCPC.
A summary of the major Pro/Cons fi.om the Rezone Finding report is as follows:
2
PRO CON
The project is designed in a manner that is Adjacent residents often perceive commercial
compatible with and provides a transition to development az a contributing factor to noise,
the surrounding residential neighborhood, pollution, crhxi,'., reduction in property values
and increazing traffic.
Unified architectural styles and guidelines In the short run construction traffic is
have been provided for. necessary for commercial development and
may be irritating to local residents.
Development standards are consistent with The subject ~ite is adjacent to a residential
those standards outlined in Division 2.8 single familyneighborhood.
(Architectural and Site Design Guidelines) of
the LDC.
Access to the site is limited to Pine Ridge
Road.
generated :ca/tic will not exceed the
The
site
significance test standard (5 percent of the
LOS "C" design volume).
FISCAL I?4PACT:
This petition ~:,y and of itself will have no fiscal impact on the County. However, if this amendment
achieves its objective, the land will be developed. The mere fact that new development has been
approved ',,,,ill result in a future fiscal impact on County public facilities. The County collects impact
fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help off-set the impact of each new development on
public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects in the Capital Improvement Element
needed to maintain adopted levels of sep,'ice for public facilities. In the event that impact fee
collections are inadequate to maintain adoptr,a:l levels of service, the County must provide supplemental
funds from other revenue sources in order to build needed facilities.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
All of the property is located within the Urban Designated - Interchange Activity Center on the Future
Land Use Map to the FLUE to the GIMP. The property is presently zoned for si.:gle family use and is
undevelcped.
A review of consistency relationships with elements of the GMP is as follows:
FEB 1 0 1998
3
Future Land Use Elcmer~t - This petition proposes a change from single family to commercial in order
to make it possible to construct a hotel/motel, professional office, medical office, retail shopping plaza
and restaurant on-site, The subject site is located within the Urban Designated Area as identified on
the Future Land Use Map, within the Pine Ridge Road/Interstate 75 Interchange Activity Center. The
function of the Interchange Activity Center provides for a mixture of commercial u.~es for the traveling
and passer-by public.
In 1983, the subject property was designated as a commercial node as indicated on the Collier County
Comprehensive Plan and Map. In 1989, its designation changed to Interchange Activity Center. The
designation change in 1989 specifically identified the subject properW within the Pine Ridg~e Road/
Interstate 75 Interchange Activity Center, consequently e~,'marking this property, for commercial use.
In staff's opinion, the subject site has been designated as a commercial node for over 14 years, and is
deemed consistent with the criteria setforth in the Future Land Use Element and the Growth
Management Plan.
Traffic (~irculation Element - Staffhas reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement ('rls) and has
the following comment: The ITE Trip Generation Manual indicates that the proposed rezone will
generate approximately 2,070 trips on a weekday after trip adjustments. No phasing .schedule has been
provided, although, the TIS indicates that build-out should occur in 2000. Based on this data, the site
generated traffic will not exceed the significance test standard (5 percent of the LOS "C" design
volume) on Pine Rifige Road after trip assignments are made. Furthermore, this petition will not lower
the level of service below any adopted LOS "D" standard within the project's radius of development
influence (RDI). Therefore, the project is consistent with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Traffic Cin:ulation
Element (TCE).
The TCE lists Pine Ridge Road (CR-896) as a 4 lane arterial road fi'onting the project. The current
traffic count tV.,r this segment is 38,324 AADT and is operating at LOS "C". It should be noted that this
road segment is projected to be deficient by 2000. However, the Capital Improvement Element (CIE)
indicates that this segment of CR-896 will be improved to 6 lanes by 2000/2001. Therefore, this
petition complies with Policy 1.3 ofthe TCE.
HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT:
Staffs analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area of historical and
archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no
Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment is required.
Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if, during the course of site clearing,
excavation or other construction activity an historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development
within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately ~topped and the
Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted.
FEB 1 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Thc Collier County Planning Commission recommends appwval of Petition PUD-97-12 a I~'fition to
rezone the subj~t property from "E" to "PUD".
PREP,~RED BY
BRYAN MILK D,~TE
PRINCIPkL PLANNER
RE~,rlEWED BY:
ROBERT J. MULHERE, AICP DATE
CU~NT PLanNING ~~GER
DONALD W. A~OLD, MCP DA~E
PLYING SERVICES D~TMENT DI~CTOR
VINCENT A. CAUTERO, ~MiNiST~ToR '"
COMMUNITY DEV. ~'D E~RONMEN~ SVCS.
PUD-97.12 EX SUMMARY/md
FEB 1 0 1998
5
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DMSION
DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1997
RE: PETITION NO: PUD-97-12, CLESEN PUD
OWNER/AGENT:
Agent: William L. Hoover, AICP
Hoover Planning Shoppe
5051 Castello Drive $$220
Naples, Florida 34103
Owner: Frank Clesen & Sons/.ne.
316 Florence Avenue
~1[ Evanston, Illinois 60202-3298
REOUESTED ACTION:
This petition seeks to have certain land herein described rezoned from its current classification of "F"
Estates to "PUD" Planned Unit Development. '
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The property is located in the northwest quadrant of the Pine Ridge Road (CR-896) and 1-75
Interchange Activity Center, located on Tract 92, Golden Gate Estates Unit 35, Section 7, Townskip
49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on following page)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The Clesen PUD encompasses a land area of approximately 4.33 acres, of which three parcels (A, B
& C) have been established for various intensities of commercial land use. Area C (approximatelly
1.67 acres) fronts along Pine Ridge Road and is designated for restaurants, offices, drag stores, auto
supply stores and all pertained uses in Area B. Area B (approximately 1.88 acres) fronts a forty foot
wide private right-of-way (the proposed internal access drive) and is designated for hotels/motel, s,
A (approximately .55 acres) fronts Livingston Woods Lane and is designat
stormwater management. Gasoline service stations and convenience stores are prohibited within the
Clesen PUD.
Access to the subject site is provided from an existing east/west sixty ((SO) foot right-of-way easement
thru Tract ?? (located adjacent to and west of the subject site) connecting to a north/south sixty (60)
foot fight-of-way easement intersecting with Pine Ridge Road at the existing medim opening at the
Sutherland PUD entrance. These Hght-of-way easements are recorded in the Official Record Book
24S, Page $21. The shared access connection to Pine Ridge Road is encouraged and consistent with
the County's Interchange Activity Center Access Management Plan. A shared access agreement
between the owner(s) of Tract ?7 and the subject petitioner is not currently executed, however, the
owner(s) of Tract ?? submitted a PUD rezone (Petition No. PUD-9?-I? Pine Ridge Comers PUl))
presently being reviewed by staff, which provides identical right-of-ways and vehicular interconnects
with the subject PUD.
The PUD Master Plan provides a private forty (40) foot frontage road through the middle of the site
for access to Areas B and C which also functions as an interconnect to property east of the subject
site also located within the Interchange Activity Center. This frontage road is identical to the frontage
road approved in the Angileri PUD. Access to Livingston Woods Lane is prohibited.
The Master Plan also provides internal and perimeter landscape buffers, water management facilities,
open space, controlled ingress/egress and water and sewer facilities.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
Existing: The property is vacant, cleared, infested with
exotic vegetation and is zoned Estates.
Surrounding: North - To the north is Livingston Woods Lane fight-of-
way and property zoned Estates. Presently there
are a few single family residence's existing
north of and northwest of the subject site on lots
consisting of approximately 2.25 acres. The
character of this area is being developed as a
rural single family subdivision on 2.25 acre
Estates lots.
East- To the east is undeveloped Estates property
located within the Interchange Activity Center.
South - To the south is Pine Ridge Road (CR-g96) right-
of-way. Further south is the Southerland PUl),
also located within the Interchange Activity
Center. A majority of the S,utherland PUD is
developed2 with hotel's/m, ,tel s,N~FEBp~. ~_t/~1 0 1998.ts'' ^G , ,?~ ~
gasoline service stations and convenience
commercial uses.
West- To the west is undeveloped Estates property
located within the Interchange Activity Cenra'.
Further west is the Anglleri PUD and the Naples
Gateway PUD, also undeveloped.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENt.
All of the property is located within the Urban Designated - Interchange Activity Center on the Futta'e
Land Use Map to the FLUE to the GMP. The property is presently zoned for single family use and is
undeveloped.
A review of consistency relationships with elements of the GMP is as follows:
Future Land Use Element - This petition proposes a change fi.om single family to commercial in
order to make it possible to construct a hotel/motel, professional office, medical office, retail
Shopping tflaza and restaurant on-site. The subject site is located within the Urban Designated Area
as identified on the Future Land Use Map, within the Pine Ridge Roadantersme 75 Interchange
Activity Center. The function of the Interchange Activity Center provides for a mixture of{~
commercial uses .%r the traveling and passer-by public.
In 1983, the subject property was designated as a commercial node as indicated on the Collier County
Comprehensive Plan and Map. In 1989, its designation changed to Interchange Activity Center. The
designation change in 1989 specifically identified the subject property within the Pine Ridge RovA/
Interstate 75 Interchange Activity Center, consequently earmarking this property for commercial tu~e.
In staWs opinion, the subject site has been designated as a commercial node for over 14 years, and is
deemed consistent with the criteria setforth in the Future Land Use Element and the Gro~xh
Management Plan.
Traffic.. Circulation Elem~nt - Staff has reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) .,.ad
has the following comment: The ITE Trip Generation Manual indicates that the proposed rezone will
generate approximately 2,070 trips on a ~veekday after trip adjustments. No phasing schedule has
been provided, although, the TIS indicates that build-out .should occur in 2000. Based on this data,
the site generated traffic will not exceed the significance test standard (5 percent of the LOS "C"
design volume) on Pine Ridge Road after trip assignments are made. Furthermore, this petition will
not lower the level of service below any adopted LOS "D" standard within the project'.,;, radius of
development influence (RDI). Therefore, the project is consistent with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the
Traffic Circulation Element (TCE).
The TCE lists Pine Ridge Road (CR-896) as a 4 lane arterial road fronting the project. The current
traffic count for this segment is 38,324 AADT and is operating at LOS "C". It should be noted that ·
this road segment is projected to be deficient by 2000. However, the Capital In ~nt-'~
(CIE) indicates that this segment of CR-896 will be improved to 6 lan~ by 2000/2001. Therefore,
this petition complies with Policy 1.3 o£th¢ TCE.
Oven S_~acc Element - Thc total open space (1.23 acres) and the open space that each individual
development parcel sets aside as a function of complying with setbacks, water management and
design features exceeds the thirty (30) percent required by the LDC. Staff is confident that this
project as designed is consistent with thc open space element.
Other Avplicablc Element(s) - These include utilities and water management. Develol:nnent of the
land will proceed on thc bases of connection to the County's sewer and water distribution system.
Once these utility lines are completed in accordance with County standards, they will b{: deeded to
thc Collier County Water-Sewer District as required by County Ordinance.
Water management facilities will be constructed to meet County Ordinances and these will be
reviewed and approved as a sanction of obtaining subsequent development order approvals.
The above prescribed course of action makes this petition consistent with this element of the GMP.
~C/AI~_CHAEOLOGICAL IMPACTA
Staff's analysis i',:dicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area of historical and
archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefbre,
no Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment is required.
Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if, during the course of site clear/ag,
excavation or other construction activity an historic or archaeolo$ical artifact is found, all
development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be inmaediately
stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted.
EVALUATION FOR ENV']RONMENTAI__.~ TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTI, J~I,F.d
The subject petition has been reviewed by the appropriate staffresponsible for oversight related to the
above referenced areas of critical conce,:n. This primarily includes a review by the Community
Development environmen:al and engineering staff, and the Transportation Department staff.
ANALYSIS:
Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a
favorable determination must be based. This evaluation is intended to provide an objective,
comprehensive overview of the impact of the proposed land use change, be they )ositive or negative,
culminating in a staffrecommendation based on that comprehensive overview. ~e li~ are
specifically noted in Section 2.7.2.5 and Section 2.7.3.2.5 of the Land Dex opment C0iffe/thus
4 FEB 1 0 199B
requiring staff evaluation and comment, and shall be used as the basis for a recommendation of
approval or denial by the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners. Each of the
potential impacts or considerations identified during the staff review are listed under each of the
criterion noted and are categorized as either pro or con, whichever the case may be, in the opinion of
staff. Staff review of each of the criterion is followed by a summary conclusion culminating in a
determination of compliance, non-compliance, or compliance with mitigation. These evaluations are
completed as separate documents and are attached to the staff report.
Appropriate evaluation of petitions for rezoning should establish a factual basis for ~upportive action
by appointed and elected decision makers. The evaluation by professional staff should typic~flly
include an analysis of the petition's relationship to the community's future land use plan, and whether
or not a rezoning action would be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan in all
of its related elements. Other evaluation considerations should include an assessment of adequacy of
transportation infrastructure, other infi'astructure, and compatibility with adjacent land uses, a
consideration usually dealt with as a facet of analyzing the relationship of the rezonJng action to the
long range plan £or future land uses.
Notwithstanding the above, staff in reviewing the determinants for adequate findings to support a
rezoning action advise as follows:
Relationship to Future and Existing Land Uses: - A discussion of this relationship, as it applies
specifically to Collier County's legal basis for land use planning, refers to the relationship of lahe
proposed zoning ~-ction to the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Managemtmt
Plan.
The subject property is located with/n the Urban Designated Interchange Activity Center area of the
Future Land Use Map to the FLUE to the GMP. The PUD Document includes a mixture of
convenience commercial uses including eating places, banks, hotels/motels, professional and medical
offices. Convenience stores and gasoline service stations are prohibited. The PUD Master Plan
provides three land use parcels on-site, two for commercial development and one for water
management. The purpose for each parcel (A, B & C) is to provide a transition between u~es and the
residential community to the north. For example, in Area A (.55 acres) the proposed use~ include
open space ,and storm water management. This area was specifically located adjacent to Livingston
Woods Lane which abuts the residential neighborhood. Within Area A, the petitioner is also
constructing an opaque eight (8) foot high architecturally designed masonary wall within a
landscaped buffer across the rear yard adjacent to Livingston Woods Lane. In Area B (1.88 acres)
uses pemaitted are limited to hotels/motels, miscellaneous retail, sit-down restaurants, health
services, banks and professional offices. Building heights are limited to thirty-five (35) feet mad
buildings are required to be setback a minimum of eighty-two and ½ feet (82.5) from Livingston
Woods Lane. In Area C (1.67 acres) auto supply stores, fast food restaurants and all permitted
principal uses in Area B are permiucd. As a result, the project transitions from open space in the rear
yard adjacent to Livingston Woods Lane to restricted commercial uses, building heights and
development regulations adjacent to Pine Ridge Road. These building heights and restrict, e~ lat~
uses are also similar to the approved Naples Gateway PUD and the Angileri ~UD l~.a~t} Th~
only exception is that the Angileri PUD allows gasoline ~erviee stations and onvenie~e~""do~'r~;
FEB 1 0 1998
maximum height for hotels/motels is limited to two (2) stories; the remainder of the commercial
buildings axe limited to thirty (30) feet, and buildings are required to be setback ninety (90) feet fi'om
Livingston Woods Lane. The Naples Gateway PUD also prohibits gasoline service stations and
convenience stores; the maximum height for commercial buildings including hotels/motels is thirty-
five (35) feet and the setback fi.om Livingston Woods Lane is fifty feet for one story buildings and
ninety feet for two and three story buildings.
Signage, open space, ingress/egress, off-street parking, and other applicable development st~ndm'ds
comply with the requixernents of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). I.a.ndscaping
and buffering requirements are also consistent with and typically exceed LDC requirements. With
respect to the matter of compatibility, staff is of thc opinion that the subject petition is consistent with
the Collier County Growth Management Plan and is therefore compatible with other approved
Planned Unit Developments located within the subject Interchange Activity Center. In regard to the
residential property to the north, the PUD Master Plan and Document has provided a transition of
commercial uses, landscape buffers and open space to buffer any impacts of development. Th,ese
development stipulations and controlled access to the site is a commitment to protect the integrity of
the adjacent residential community.
Traffic: - Staff has reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and has the following
comment: The ITE Trip Generation Manual indicates that the proposed rezone will generate
approximately 2,070 trips on a weekday after trip adjustments. No phasing schedule has been
provided, althoul~h' the TIS indicates that build-out should occur in 2000. Based on this data, the site
generated traffic will not exceed the significance test standard (5 percent of the LOS "C" design
volume) on Pine Ridge Road after trip assignments axe made. Furthermore, this petition will not
lower the level of service below auy adopted LOS "D" standard within the project's radius of
development influence (RDI). Therefore, the project is consistent with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the
Traffic Circulation Element (TCE).
The TCE lists Pine l:Lidge Road (CR-896) as a 4 lane arterial road fronting the project. The cunent
traffic count for this segment is 38,324 AADT and is operating at LOS "C". It should be noted Ihat
th. is road segment is project to be deficient by 2000. However, the Capital Improvement Element
(CIE) indicates that this segment of CR-896 will be improved to 6 lanes by 2000/2001. Thereibre
this petition compli~:s with Policy 1.3 of the TCE.
Staff has reviewed the layout of the PUD Master Plan fi.om a planning and traffic safety standpoint
and finds the following: The proposed access is provided from an existing 60 foot right-of-way fi.om
Pine Ridge Road and connecting with the property to the east. Since there is clear sight distance at
the proposed entrance, the access should operate adequately subject to any required right-of-way
permits. It is staffs opinion that the on-site traffic circulation has been designed in a manner that
reduces possible vehicular and pedestrian conflicts. The Master Plan provides a future inter
connection with the vacant property to the east which is consistent with Policy 7.2 of the TCE.
Please note that the final traffic circulation system design will be reviewed at the time of :rite
development plan review or preliminary subdivision plat review (if required). The Traffic Accident
Report of 1996 shows the intersection of CR-896 and 1-75 as having a low tr: ,.,~: ---: .... ,of
under I0 per year. ~.~~
FEB 1 0 1998
The GMP consistency review states that approval of this petition is consistent with policies of the
TCE.
Utility ]~nfra~tructur¢ - Both a public sanitary sewer and municipal water supply is available to the
property and will be extended as a consequence of future development. All developmen! must
comply with surface wa~er management requirements invoked at the time of site developmen! plan
approval as the case will be for development of this land.
CommUnity Infrastructure and Services - The subject property is readily accessible to a whole range
of community infrastructure which is enhanced by its frontage on Pine Ridge Road. Shopping
centers, business offices and medical offices of various specialties are all within a short driving
distance.
Summary - Based on the above analysis the following conclusions can be drawn from the staffrelx~rt:
1. The action to rezone the property from Estates to PUD and the PUD development strategy for
commerc!:a! development and related facilities is consistent with the FLUE to the GMP.
2. The proposed commercial uses and development regulations are consistent with that
authorized by the Interchange Activity Center Designation of the FLUE.
3. All other pertinent elements of the GMP were reviewed and the methods for achieving
consistency are made a part of the PUD regulations or otherwise achieved by the PUD Ma~,~.r
Plan.
4. A preponderance of the rezone and PUD findings support a recommendation of approval and
compatibility with adjacent land uses.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Collier County Planning Commission recommend approval of Petition PUD-97-12, Clesen PUD
pursuant to the Ordinance of Adoption end Exhibits attached thereto.
FEB 1 0 1998
7
PREPARED BY'
BRYA~MmK
PR.INCI~AL PLANNER
REVIEWED BY:
, AICP DATE
DONA.L[~'~ ARNOLD, AICP ~
' DATE
b~G SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
~" ~ /R -~ - ~ 7
VINCENT A. CAUTERO, AICP, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMM15NITY DEV. AND ENVIRONMENTAJ., SVCS.
Petition Number ?UD-97-12
Staff Report for January 15, 1998 CCPC meeting.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION:
MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN
PUD-97~l 2 STAFF REPORT/md
s FEB 1 0 1998
___.,,g./~ -.._
REZONE FINDINGS
PETITION PUD-97-12
Section 2..7.2.5. of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the report and
recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners shall
show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation
to the following, where applicable:
1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and
policies and Future Land Use map and the elements of the Growth Management
Plan;
_Pro/CQn: Evaluation not applicable.
$.umma~ Findings: The subject property is located within the Urban Area and is
designated as an Interchange Activity Cen:er. The uses permitted within this district ar~-
intended to provide the traveling public with highway commercial uses (hotel/motel,
miscellaneous retail, professional offices, personal services and auto services).
A revi :w by appropriate staff has indicated that this petition has been designed to account
for tht' necessary relationships dictated by the GMP. Where appropriate, stipulations
have been generated to ensure consistency with the GMP during the permitting process.
Therefore, this petition has been deemed to be consistent with the GMP.
2. The existing land use pattern;
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Existing: The property is vacant, cleared, infested with exotic
vegetation and is zoned Estates.
Surrounding: North- To the north is Livingston Woods Lane right-of..
way and property zoned Estates. Presently there:
are a few single family residences existing north of
and northwest of the subject site on lots consisting
of approximately 2.25 acres. The character of this
area is being developed as a rural single family
subdivision on 2.25 acre lots.
East - To the east is undeveloped Estates property located
within the Interchange Activity C~/'~
L£B 1 0 1998
p~. /~'
South- To the south is Pine Ridge Road (CR-896) right-
of-way. Further south is the Southerland PUD,
also located within the Interchange Activity
Center. A majority of the Southerland PUD is
developed with hotel's/motel's, restaurants,
gasoline service stations and convenience
West- To the west is undeveloped Estates property
located within the Interchange Activity Center.
Further wes! is the Angileri PUD and the Naples
Gateway PUD, also undeveloped.
3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts;
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Summary' Findings: The parcel is of a sufficient size that it will not result in an isolated
district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is contiguous oth~:
zoning ,:lassifications within the Interchange Activity Center that essentially permit thc:
saf~e uses.
4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn la relation to existing
' conditions on the property proposed for change;
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Summar3' Findings: The district boundaries are logically drawn and they are consistent
with the Pine Ridge Road/I-75 Interchange Activity Center.
5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed
amendment necessary;
Pro/Con; Evaluation not applicable.
Summary Findinf~s: The proposed zoning change is appropriate based on the existing
conditions of the subject property and because its relationship to the FLUE (Future Land
Use Element of the GMS) is a positive one.
6. Whether the proposed change will adversely Influence living onditlons in thc:
neighborhood; FEB 1 0 1998
2
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
~ummar-v Findings: The proposed change will not adversely influence livh:g
conditions in the neighborhood because the recommended development standards, site
specific land use designations, controlled ingress/egress, landscape buffers and other
conditions for approval have been promulgated and designed to ensure the least amou:nt
of adverse impact on adjacent and nearby developments. Furthermore, the propos¢;d
project is in compliance with the GMP and is compatible with existing commercial PUD
developments within the Activity Center.
7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion
or create V,.'pes of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because
of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during
construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety;
Pro..__A.' (i) Development of the subject property is consistent with provisions of the
Traffic Element of the GMP, therefore traffic intensity should not
adversely affect the comfort and safety ofexisting users on adjacent public
roads.
{,ii) One ingress/egress point is provided onto Pine Ridge Road of which
complies with the County's Access Management Plan.
(iii) The subject property is located adjacent to the County's arterial road
system.
Con.'_ (i) As urban intensification increases, there is some loss of comfort and ease:
of travel to the motoring public. However, by law this degree of
discomfort is regulated by concurrency requirements.
(ii) In the short run construction traffic is necessary for commercial
development, and this may be irritating to local residents.
Summa~.._F~ Evaluation of this project took into account the requirement for
consistency with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Traffic Element of the GMP and was found
consistent, a statement advising that this project when developed will not excessively
increase traffic congestion. Additionally certain traffic management system
improvements are required as a condition of approval (i.e. turn lanes, traffic signals,
dedications, etc.). In the final analysis all projects are subject to the Concurrency
Management system.
8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem;
Pro.__~: Road improvements precipitated by this development and water
management improvements to accommodate site development are
designed to accommodate the normal drainage requirement.
Con.: Urban intensification potentially can heighten the occasion for area-wide
flooding under the more severe rainfall event.
S. ummar~, Findings: Every project approved in Collier County involving the utilization
of land for some land use activity is scrutinized and required to mitigate all sub-surface
drainage generated by developmental activities as a condition of approval. This project
was reviewed for drainage relationships and design and construction plara~ are required to
meet County standards as a condition of approval. In the event area wide deficiencies
develop, which deficiencies would be further exacerbated by developing vacant land, the
County is required to react through its Concurrency Management system.
9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas;
...Pro/Con.' Evaluation not applicable.
Summary, Findinas: All projects in Collier County are subject to the development
standards that are unique to the zoning district in which it is located. These development
standards and others apply generally and equally to all zoning districts (i.e. open space
requirement, corridor management provisions, etc.) were designed to ensure that light
penetration and circulation of air does not adversely affect adjacent areas.
10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent
area;
Pro: (i) Urban intensification typically increases the value of adjacent vacant or
underutilized land.
(ii) Development standards, site design, landscape buffers and site specific
land uses generally reflect the quality ora project.
Con: ) There is no way to guarantee that ~s project will be marketed in a manner
comparable to other commercial projects within the existing Interchange
Activity Center.
Summary Findings: Staff is of the opinion that no adverse affect is contemplated
because the property has been designated for commercial use by the 1983 £
Plva~, and a.s amended by the 1989 Growth Management Plan.
FEB 1 0 1998
~a. ,,9.0
11. Whether the proposed change will be. a deterrent to the improvement or
development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations;
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Summary Findlnes: The b;~ic premise underlying all of the development standards in
the zoning division of the Land Development Code is that their sound application when
combined with the administrative site development plan approval process, gives
reasonable assurance lhat a change in zoning will not result in a deterrence to
improvement or development of adjacent property.
Also the PUD document has transitioned the intensity of commercial uses to specific
parcels identified on the PUD Master Plan. This arrangement coupled with the
requirement to build an opaque landscape buffer adjacent to Living,ston Woods Lane
should provide reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in a
deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent residential property.
12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an
individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare;
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Summan, Findines: The proposed development complies with the Growth
Management Plan, a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are
consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact the proposed change does
not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the GMP is further
determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in
the public interest.
13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in
accordance with existing zoning;
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Summary' Findings_.' The subject property can continue to be utilized and developed in
accordance with the existing zoning. However to do so would deny this petitioner the
opportunity to maximize the development potential of the site as made possible by its
ccnsistency relationship with the GMP.
14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or
the CounW;
,Pro: The project is designed in a manner that is compatible with surrounding
approved and improved commercial property in size and scale.
The proposed PUD would authorize commercial land uses rather than single
family use. Existing neighbors within the Livingston Woods subdivision
may feel that the proposed change is out ofscale with the neighborhood.
..Summary, Findings_:: Since the proposed zone change will not generate vehicular trips
that will lower the LOS below adopted standards, the project will not adversely impact
the neighborhood. The proposed development also complies with the FLUE to the GMP,
and intensity of land use is deemed acceptable for this site. Furthermore, a viable
interchange commercial district has been determined to be a legitimate need and is not
out of scale with the needs ofthe County.
15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed
use in districts already permitting such use;
.Pro/Co,~... Evaluation not applicable.
Summary, Findinzs: There are many sites which are zoned to accommodate the
proposed development. This is not the determining factor when evaluating the
appropriateness of a rezoning decision. The determinants of zoning are consistency with
all elements of the GMP, compatibility, adequacy of infrastructure and to some extent the
timing of the action and all of the above criteria.
16. ]'he physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which
would be required to make the properS., usable for any of the range of potential uses
under the proposed zoning classification;
Pro__..A The subject property has been historically cleared and filled. Presently exotic
vegetation has invaded the site, however environmental impacts are minimal.
Cog: Development of the site would create a need for additional fill and site
alteration for infi'astructure improvements.
Summarx. Findings_.- The extent of site alteration will be determined as a function of'
obtaining a Site Development Plan approval to execute the PUD's development strategy.
FEB 1 0 1998
6
17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and
services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth
Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County
Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended;
~ Evaluation not applicable.
Summary Findings: A multi-disciplined team responsible for.jurisdictional elements of
the GIV[P have reviewed this petition and have found it consistent with the GMP, and
where consistency relationships are brought by the development conditions or
commitments, that these have been promulgated and made conditions precedent to
approval. In any event, this petition shall be subject to adequate public facilities at ~e
earliest, or next to occur, of either Final SDP approval, Final Plat approval, or building
permit issuance applicable to this development. All related public utilities have been
deemed adequate to serve this project. The site generated trips will not lower the level of
service below the adopted LOS "D" standard for any road segment within the pro,ject's
radius of development influence (RDI).
NOTE:
GMP as used herein means the Collier County Growth Management Plan.
FLUE means the Future Land Use Element of the GMP.
REZONE FINDINGS PUD-97-12/md
FEB 1 0 1998
'7
,.
FINDINGS FOR PUD
PUD-9?-12
Section 2.7.3.2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Planning
Commission to make a finding as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the following
criteria:
1. The suitability of the area for the type and patter~ of development proposed in
relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access,
drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities.
Pro: (i) The subject site has been earmarked for commercial use. The
Interchange Activity Center is depicted on the FLUE to the GM]?,
providing for convenience commercial, professional office and hotel]
motel uses.
(ii) Intensifying land development patterns produces economies of scale
relative to public utilities, facilities and services, which are currently
available in this area.
(iii) The proposed ingress/egress point aligns
the
existing
median
opening within Pine Ridge Road at the Sutherland PUD. Also a
service road is provided on-site to interconnect the adjacent property to
the east.
Con: Existing residents often perceive intensification in their neighborhood as
contributing factors to inconveniencing movements to and from their place of
residence, increasing noise and pollution, and reducing property values.
Flnding~ Jurisdictional reviews by County staff support the manner and pattern of
development proposed for the subject property. Development conditions contained in the
PUD document give assurance that all infi'astructure will be developed and consistent
with County regulations. Any inadequacies which require supplementing the PUD
document will be recommended to the Board of County Commissioners as conditions of
approval by staff and CCPC.
2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,
contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly
as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing
operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or
maintained at public expense.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
FEB 1 0 1998
Finding: Documents submitted with the application provide evidence of unified control.
The PUD document makes appropriate provisions for continuing operation and
maintenance of common areas.
3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives
and policies of the Growth Management Plan;
pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Finding: The subject petition has been found consistent with the goals, objectives a:nd
policies of the Growth Management Plan.
The subject property is located within the Urban Designated-Interchange Activity Center
on the Future Land Use Map to the FLUE to the GIMP.
The subject site is located within the Urban Designated Area as identified on the Future
Land Use Map, within the Pine Ridge Road/Interstate-75 Interchange Activity Center.
The function of the Interchange Activity Center provides for a mixture of commercial
uses for the traveling public and passerbys.
In 19~13, the subject property was designated as a commercial node as indicated on the
Collier County Comprehensive Plan and Map. In 1989, its designation changed to an
Interci',ange Activity Center. The designation change in 1989, specifically identified the
subject property within the Activity Center, earmarking this property for commercial use.
In staffs opinion, the subject site has been designated as a commercial node for over 13
years and is consistent with the criteria set forth in the Future Land Use Element and
with the Grow'th Management Plan.
Traffic Circulation Element - The estimated project trips will not exceed 5% of the LOS
"C" design volume within the projects radius of development influence (RI)I).
Furthermore, the site generated trips will not create a concurrency problem within the
RDI because the project trips don't lower the capacity below any road's adopted LOS "D"
standard.
The proposed PUD rezone will not create or excessively increase traffic congestion on
the arterial road system at build-out and complies with Policies 1.3, 1.4, 5.1, 5.2, 7.2 and
7.3 of the TCE.
_Open Space Element - The total open space (1.23 acres) and the open space that each
individual development project sets aside as a function ofcomplying with setbacks, water
management and design features exceeds the thirty (30) percent required by the LDC.
Staffis confident that this project as designed is consistent with the open space element.
Ot___her Applicable Elements - These include utilities and
Development of the land will proceed on the bases of connection to the
and water distribution system.
gEl 1 0 1998
2
Once these utility lines are completed in accordance with County standards, they will be
deeded to the Collier County Water-Sewer District as required by County Ordinances.
Water management facilities will be constructed to meet County Ordinances and these
wilt be reviewed and approved as a sanction of obtaining subsequent development orde,~
approvals.
The above prescribed course of action makes this petition consistent with this element of
the GMS.
4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions ma~,
include restrictions on locution of Improvements, restrictions on design, and
buffering and screening requirements.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Findine:The PUD Master Plan has been designed to provide a transition of commercial
intensity throughout the site through the use of designated areas for development,
landscaping, buffering, vehicular interconnects, sidewalks and shared ingres,~egress.
O 5. The ad?quacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the
development.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Findine: The amount of open space (30%) set aside by this project is consistent with the
provisions of the Land Development Code.
6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of
available improvements and facilities, both public and private.
Pro/Con:. Evaluation not applicable.
Findin£: Timing or sequence of development in light of concurrency requirements
automatically triggers the mechanism for ensuring that further LOS degradation is not
allowed or the LOS deficiency is corrected.
7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate
expansion.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Finding: Ability, a~ applied in this context, implies supporting intl' ~tru
wastewater disposal system, potable water supplies, characteristic: of
relative to hazards, and capacity of roads, is supportive of condition ~u,l~tilq~ f~
urban development. This assessment is described at length in the staffrepon. Relative to
this petition, development of the subject property is timely, because supporting
infrastructure is available and deemed to be adequate.
8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such
regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications
are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to Hteral
application of such regulations.
Pro/Con: Evaluation not applicable.
Findini~: The development standards to be applied to the types of land uses authorized
by the PUD document are consistent with those development criteria established in the
Interchange Activity Center as designated by the Future Land Use Element. The
development standards are also consistent with existing PUD's within the subject
Interchange Activity Center.
FI'NDfNGS FOR PUD-97-12/md
FEB 1 0 1998
4
,_
COLLIER COUNTY 'b .~-.._..
APPLICATION FOR PUD REZONE ~ "
PETITION NO." " " ·
COOling^TinG PL t,a, mR:
Applicant Name (Agent): William L. Hoover, AIQP, 9fHoover Planning Sho_o~
Address: 5051 Castello Dr. # 220, Naples, FL 34103 Phone: 403-8899 Fax: 403-9009
and Beau Keene, P.E., of Green, Keene, & Erek, Inc.
Address: 3806 Exchange Ave.. Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 262-7525 Fax: 262-6231
Property Owner (Petitioner) Name and Address: Frank (~le~;en & Sons, Inc,, Attn,
Richard J. Clesen, President, 316 FloTence Ave., Evans!on, IL 60202-329_8 Phone: 847-
869-2257
Detailed Legal Description of Subject Propert3':
Section7 Township 49S Range ..2.6E
Tract 92, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 35, according to plat in Plat Book 7, page 85 of
the Public Records of Collier Count',,,, Florida.
Property. Id,:.utification #: 38456200002
Size of Property: 330 Feet x 571 Feet = 4.33_+ Acres
General Location of Subject Property.: On the north side of Pine Ridee Road, 1/4 mile
east of the intersection between Pine Ridve Road and Whippoonvill Lane.
Adjacent Zoning and Land Use:
ZONING LAND USE
N - ROW & Estates Livingston Road 8: Vacant
S - ROW & Sutherland PUD Pine Ridge Road & Waffle House
E - Estates & ROW Vacant & 1-75 Frontage Road.
W - Estates Vacant.
Existing Zomng: Estates.
Proposed Land Use or Range of Uses: PUD with Permitted Uses of v,-pical highway
commercial land uses.
Does Property Owner own contiguous properW to the subject property: If so, give
complete legal description of the entire contiguous property:
No. ^ci~ ^ '"
FEB 1 0 1998
Has a public hearing for a rezone been held on this property within the past 12 months?
If yes, please write the rezone application number.
No,
Is this property, currently vacant? Yes. If the answer is no please describe the currem
land use and all existing structures.
c,'-/7-77
Signature of Petitioner Date
* If petitioner is a corporation other than a public corporations, so indicate and name
officers and major stockholders.
* If petitioner is a land trust, so indicate and name beneficiaries.
* If petitioner is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate
and name principals.
* If petitioner is a leasee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual owners if no! indicated
on the lea2~e,
* If petitioner is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract, and indicate actual owner's
name and address.
See attached authorization letter and deed.
F_. Clesen & Sons, Inc. is an Illinois corporation. Richard J. Clesen is president of this
corporation and resides much of the year at 414 Rosemeade Lane, Naples, FL
L FEB 1 0 1998 I
HOOVER PLANNING SHOPPE
Rezonings, PUD's, Site Dev. Plans, Affor. dable Housing, Conditional Uses,
Trafflc/Parking~oning Studies and Variances (In Collier & Lee Counties)
July 29, 1997 -
· . UL 3 O 1 97
Project Planner Bryan Milk F /. ~ 9 ~
Collier County Current Planning
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34014
RE: Description of and Basis for Approval of the Clesen PUD
Dear Mr. Milk:
The subject property is 4.33 acres in size and is located on the north side of Pine Ridge Road
approximately 1000 feet east of the intersection between Pine Ridge Road and Whippoorwill
Lane. The property is within the area designated as Interstate Activity Center on the Future Land
Use Map. Access would be via easements across the abutting parcel to the west. The Collier
County Access Management Plan designates our joint access onto Pine Ridge Road a~ a right-
in/fight-out access only. Since the Access Management Plan shows that as the sole access for
both propertie:, to the east of the subject property, the petitioner's attorney is in the process of
offering an updated 40 foot access easement across the subject property, for both those
properties to utilize. The Future Land Use Element states the full array of commercial land uses
may be allowed within an Inte:'state Activity Center and we are proposing highway interchange
commercial uses and convenience commercial uses. Gas stations and convenience stores with
gas pumps are not being requested in the Ciesen PUD.
The Future Land Use Element requires that all rezoning petitions within Activity Centers provide
an evaluation of the following factors, that are shown in bold (Note: The first two factors have
been combined since they overlap significantly. Additionally, per your request, a detailed
marketing study is being prepared and will be submitted by Quinby Appraisal & Research, Inc.)
The amount, type sad location of e~isting zoned and developed commercial uses within or
in close proximity of the Activity Center. Existing patterns of land nsc within or ha close
proximity of the Activity Center.
At the southeast comer of the intersection between Pine Ridge Road and 1-75 is the Astron Plaza
PUD (descriptions are shown on the attached Access Management Plan map). This 7.6 site is
· proposed for a 30,000 to 60,000 square feet medical outpatient center by the Cleveland Clinic.
The remainder of the southeast quadrant consists of the Unitarian Universalist Congregation
Church, that is located adjacent to the canal and south of the Asa'on PI.~'-, and Estates property
for existing and future single-family homes.
The 24 acres adjacent to 1-75 is proposed as a hospital by the Cleveland Cli~c.t.~4~_og t]~)_
co:nmercial tract is the Vineyards' Crossroads Market, which has a Publix withi[~ a I}-7;O00" ,oog
Ms. Bryan MiLk
July 29, 1997
P~;¢ 2
square foot neighborhood shol:~ping center and on 2 outt)arcels, an AM South
combination Mobil/McDonald. To the north and northeast of' these 2 large commerci~ tra~
are typically multi-family condominiums.
Approximately 1/2 of the southwest quadrant of' this interchange is currently zoned Agricultural
and undeveloped, and the remaining I/'2 is zoned for commercial uses within 3 PUDs. At thc
mos~ western section of this southwes~ qu~lrant is the Pine Ridge Cen~-~' We~
and to i~s east is the Pine Ridge Center PUD (9 ~res). Both are ~proved for g~ stations,
motels, restaurmts, offices, and convenience commercial uses. In my professior~J opinion,
these 2 adjoining PUDs were not very marketable until public sewer became -v~il~le, aborn 7
months ago. The Sutherland PUD (15 acres) has been developed with a Chevron station,
restaurant, Shell station, Burger King, Waffle House, and Knights Inn Motel. Additionally, a
second motel is now under eonstructiort, located eas~ of the Waffle House. Just to the south of
the Activit~ Center are many acres of vac.~nt Agricultural land, the Hospice of Naples, und the
Seagate Baptist Church.
The northwest quadrant of this interchange has had no commercial development at tl~ time
again primaaiiy due to the lack of public sewer availability, until recently. The western 1/3 of
the quadrant w/th this Activity Center is composed of the 13-acre Naples Cr~tew~y PUD.
southeastern area of this PUD is approved for restaurants, banks, gas statior~, and convenience
commercial uses. The remainder is approved for motels, sit-down restaurants, offices, banks,
and convenience commercial uses. At the northeast comer of Whippoorwill Lane and Pine
Ridge Road is the Angileri PUD, where a Race Trac gas station should be under construction, on
the front parcel, in the nex~ few months. The remainder of the Activity Cemer within this
quadrant, including the subject property, fronts along Pine Ridge Road which makes all of the
parcels logical to be rezoned for commercial land uses. Livingston Woods Lane separates these
Activity Center parcels from the Estates Zoning Disu'ict to the north for single-family homes.
Market demand and service area for the proposed commercial land uses lo be used as ·
guide to explore the feasibility of the requested lind uses,
Currently, there is a very strong m~ket demand for highway interchange and convenience
commercial land uses at this Interstate Activity Center based on the following cla~: 1) This
interchange or intersection has more traffic than nearly any other intersection i,-a Collier Cotmty
and is located within a very high growth area of the County. 2) The proposed Cleveland Clinic
Outpatient Center and Cleveland Clinic Hospital are planned for regional medical uses thai will
attract additional motorim to this interchange who will also need our proposed services. 3)
Many of the motorists travel/rig Pine Ridge Road adjacent to our site are employed in Naples and
reside on Estates' properties located off of Pine Ridge Road east of 1-75, White Boulevard,
Golden Gate Boulevard, or C.R. 951 nearby its imersection with Pine Ridge R~ ~,~
Center is basically the only commercial center east of Airport Road for ~_ese ~ :sicle~s
while on their commute to and from work. 4) Many motorists traveling 1--75 fi', ,m the E~O~/~to~
desire typical interchange services after traveling across the Everglades, where he~Bm11~a
Mr. B .ryan Milk
July 29, 1997
Page 3
single stop with facilities for approximately 80 miles, before entering the Greater Naples Area.
(Per a past discussion with M?O Office, commercial uses are not intended for ~ funtr~
interchange at Golden Gate Parkway and 1-75.)
Adequacy of infrastracture capacity, particuinrly roads.
Public water and public sewer are available to the site. Even though the subject site is intended
to serve primarily passerby motorists, Pine Ridge Road and 1-75 currently have adequate levels
of service.
Compatibility of the proposed development with and adequacy of buffering for adjoining
properties,
Our PUD Master Plan portrays numerous planning strategies that minimize the impacts from our
proposed development on neighboring parcels, with standards that typically exceed those of
existing approved PUDs in the immediate vicinity. The following planning techniques ~
utilized to ensure that our impacts would be inconsequential to existing and fiatur~ residents in
the Estates Di.vrict, located to the north of us across Livingston Woods Lane. 1) A landscaping
buffer, with double the landscaped screening required in the Land Development Code (IX)C) and
a masora'y wall, was provided along Livingston Woods Lane. 2) The northern 72.5 fe~t of the
site was designated only as open space and water management areas. (This is the same
percentage of the site devoted to open space and water management areas as the larger Angileri
PUD.) 3) A minimum 82.5 foot setback was guaranteed from Livingston Woods Lane. 4) Our
more inte~3_sive land uses were located nearest to Pine Ridge Road. Future residences along the
nonhero side of Livingston Woods Lane will be a minimum of 217.5 feet from any slxucmres on
our property since they are required to have a 75 foot front yard setback, in addition to our 82.5
foot rear yard setback and the 60 foot ROW. By designating this area as an Interstate Activity
Center for the full array of commercial uses and by virtue of the County's existing approvals for
similar uses at the Naples Gateway PUD and the Angileri PUD, the County has previously made
the finding that the proposed commercial uses are compatible with the surrounding area.
Natural or man-made constraints.
The property is not constrained.
Criteria identified in the Zoning Ordinance and other relevant factors.
Most of these criteria have already been discussed. However since the land is nearly void of
vegetation, and "high and dry", there are no physical characteristics that would make our
proposed development unsuitable. Our development will exceed the minimum 3~-,i,
requiremer, ts.
FEB 1 0 1998
Mr. Bryan Milk
July 29, 1997
Page 4
In addition, the applicant shall generally identify development trends within the Activity
Center and demonstrate compatibility with existing and proposed development through
urban design criteria such as buffering and architectural controls and how the propmed
project would limit adverse impacts on the highway network by controlling road access
points and coordinating on and off-site movement of traffic with surrounding properties.
Generally, the half of this Interstate Activity Center that is located east of 1-75 has been
developed primarily for neighborhood commercial and proposed regiorml medical uses 1hat
would generate the impetus for motorists to drive a substantial distance out oftheir ~,ay for these
services (the Cleveland Clinic Outpatient Center and proposed Cleveland Clinic Hospital), The
development trends on the remaining (western) half of the Interstate Activity Center ~re to
provide highway interchange commercial uses and neighborhood uses, that axe primarily for
passerby motorists. Our project has incorporated similar land uses and site pla~ming strategies
as fmmd on the latest approved PUD in this northwest quadrant, the Angileri PUD, except gas
stations are not requested as a Permitted Use.
Common plmming strategies with the Angileri PUD include: 1) Architecturally, the buildings
must have peaked roofs that are finished in tile or metal and all buildings must be primarily
finished in light colors except for decorative trim. 2) Architecturally designed low-level lighting
is required. 3) The Clesen PUD ~ the northern 12.7% of the site designated as Area A, where
only open space and stormwater management areas are permitted. 4) The buffer and wall with/n
Area A has also been specified to protect future residences to the north across Livingston Woods
Lane. 5) The more intensive land uses, in oar case fast food restaurants, is located in Area C the
area fimhest from Livingston Woods Lane.
In summars.', the proposed Clesen PUD meets all the requirements of the Growth Management
Plan and the La. nd Development Code. All of our requested land uses have been approved by the
County in each of the other commercial PUDs approved in the western half of this Activity
Center. By the use of commonly accepted planning techniques we have m~ximized
compatibility ~th neighboring properties. Additionally, by the use of shaxed cross accesses we
are assisting Collier County in executing their Access Management Plan for this interchange.
Prepared by;
HOOVER PLANNING SHOPPE
William L. Hoover,
Enclosure ~.o~'=---"'~0
FEB 1 0 1998
NOTARIZED LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION ': '~ ~
RE: PUD Rezoning Petition for Tract 92, Golden Gate Estates Unit 35, Located
Northwest of the Pine Ridge Road and Interstate 75 Interchange, Collier County,
Flodda
To Whom It May Concern:
Please be advised that the Hoover Planning Shoppe, 2223 Trade Center Way, Naples,
Flodda 34109, and Green, Keene, and Erek, Inc., 3806 Exchange Avenue, Naples,
Flodda 34104 have been engaged by the property owner(s) shown below to act as
authorized agents and to request necessary applications during the PUD Rezoning
process for the subject project.
'dSroperty Own,~¢ -
-"f:)rope rty Owner
STATE OF ~?,~
COUNTY OF ~ ~ ,/2~,
,199.~ by ~tC/-~,4/_'b ~ .5'[/,v who is personally
known to ~e or has produced .'"~'~_.~,./,.~c. C..Q'~'.
dentification and who did (did not) take an oath. '
Pul~[ic<-''
My Commission Expires: ~-'"~:~'
FEB 1 0 1998
i p,. a'./ -_
iJ 97.. - I., ~., ,
il
33140, ~o ~ ~ i m ~ .......
IKIJ:~J[VtlJC~ O~ all o£ Blc~lon 7, ~mm~bip 49 Sou~h, PJnqe 26
bat, according to ~he Pi&~ ~barlO£, rlcc:~d~ in Pllt Book
Paq~ ~5, ~Zlc Recordl of Collier County, Florida,
parttc~lLry d48crJJ~d es follmm=
of ro~ord and fixes flor ~ha ¥1ar 1996 and
· l~ lfo~lo No.: '~14~&~O00O~
~rantor hereAn hereby ltatel and &ffirna ~hat ~hl real
h~ ~ey~ ham never ~ a~ l~tfi~lly 11 not al
2209 ~G: 0983
Si~, sealed, ~ delivered
:
~TATE OF
~ore ~, a ~o~ ~lic, ~e forgoing Anl~nC v~
a~l~q~ ~AI ~ ~y of ,~Jty , 1996, by ~ZO ~X~, ~o
{~ ii ~.~onally ~ ~o ii or { ) provid~ driver's liM~e al
i~Xfl~lon.
~5 '~ ha~ ~ official seal An ~e Co~y ~d S~ate Last
af~i~ ~in ~ day of ~uLY , 19.6.
"" ~ '" Pr/nt~ ~: ~J4.~ /
.. ~ .~ ,~
~aron Zuccaro, E~K~. NAe~~
~dd A Zu~o
FEB 1 0
LIST OF PROFESSIONALS WOR~_!N~ ON PUD REZONINO
Beau Keene, P.E., 240 Aviation Drive, Naples, FL 34104
Phone # 403-9399 Fax # 403-9399
Steve Erek, PLS, Greene, Keene & Erek, Inc., 3806 Exchange
Avenue, Naples, FL 34104
Phone ~ 262-7525 Fax # 262-6231
William L. Hoover, ~ICP, Hoover Planning Shoppe, 5051 Castello
Drive, Suite 220, Naples, FL 34103
Phone # 403-8899 Fax # 403-9009
Jeep Quinby, Quinby Appraisal & Research, Inc., 3800 Airport Road
North, Naples, EL 34105
Phone # 263-9337 Fax # 263-9388
John D. Spear, P.A., 9200 Bonita Beach Road, Suite 204, Bonita
Springs, FL 34135
Phone # 947-1102 Fax # 947-5055
&GE. NDAJTEM
FEB 1 0 199__)
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
% AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102 THE
5 COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH
6 INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR
~ THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
6 BY AMENDING THE OFFICI;tL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER
9 GGE01; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF
l0 THE HEREIN DESCRIBED R~2tL PROPERTY FROM ~E~
ll ESTATES TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS
12 CLESEN PUD FOR COMMERCI~tL USES, FOR PROPERTY
l~ LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PINE RIDGE ROAD (C.R.
~4 896), WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF PINE RIDGE ROAD
15 (C.R. 896) AND INTERSTATE 75, TRACT 92, GOLDEN
16 GATE ESTATES UNIT 35, IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 49
~? SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
16 CONSISTING OF 4.33 ACRES MORE OR LESS; AND BY
19 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
2~ WHEREAS, William L. Hoover, AICP, of Hoover Planning Shoppe
22 and Beau Keene, P.E., of Green, Keene & Erek, Inc., representing
23 Frank Clesen & Sons, Inc., petitioned the Board of County
2¢ Co~missioners to change the zoning classification of the herein
25 described real property;
26 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County
O 27 Commissioners of Collier County, Florida:
26 SECTION ONE:
2~ The zoning classification of the herein described real
30 property located in Section 7, Township 49 South, Range 26 East,
]~ Collier County, Florida, is changed from "E" Estates to "PUD"
32 Planned Unit Development in accordance with the Clesen PUD
]~ Document, at%ached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by
~ reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number GGE01, as
35 described in Ordinance Nu~er 91-102, the Collier County Land
36 Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly.
~? SECTION TWO:
~6 This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the
~9 Department of State.
%0
'1-
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County
of Collier Coun=y, Florida, ~his ~ ~y of ,
1998.
BO~D OF CO~Y C~ISSIONE~
CO~IER CO~TY, ~RI~
ATTEST:
BY:
Chai~n
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk
Approved as ~o
and Legal Sufficiency
Assistant County A~torney
FEB 1 0 1998
p;._ 3 ?
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION REQUESTING
APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 97-79 TO CORRECT A
SCRIVENER'S ERROR TO THE PELICAN MARSH PUD DOCUMENT RESULTING FROM A
TRANSMITYAL TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF A DOCUMENT IN WHICH CERTAIN
PAGES WERE INADVERTENTLY OMITTED.
OBJECTIVE:
To correct the omission of certain pages fi.om the approved Pelican Marsh PUD Document adopted by
Ordinance Number 97-79 transmitted to the Secretary of State,
CONSIDERATIONS:
Ordinance Number 97-79 was adopted by the Collier County Board of Cormnissioners on December 9,
copy Secretary to pages - 10 thru $ - 14 as
1997.
The
transmitted
to
the
of
State
failed
include
8
approved, necessitating this corrective action.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Nolle.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
None.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the scrivener's error corrective ordinance as drafted
and made a part of this Executive Summary.
FEB 1 0 1998
(.~pREpARED_ BY
"~'0NALD F. i~O} ~icP DATE
CHIEF PLANER
REVIEWED BY:
LHERE, AICP DATE
CURRENT PLANING MANAGER
PLANN NG SERVICE EP~TMENT DI~CTOR
¢f~C~T ~. CAUTtaO, ~MlmST~TOa ~AT~
CO~MUmTY ~V. ~
E~IRONMENT~
SVCS.
PELICAN MARSH PUD SCRiVENER'S ERROR EX SUMMARY/md
FEB 1 0 1998
2
ORDINANCE NO. 98-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 97-79, FOR
THE PELICAN MARSH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(PUD) TO CORRECT A SCRIVKNER'S ERROR
RESULTING FROM THE OMISSION OF PAGES
NUMBERED 8-10 THROUGH 8-14 FROM EXHIBIT
"A" THEREOF, THE PELICAN MARSH PUD
DOCUMENT AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted
Ordinance No. 97-79, an ordinance amending the boundaries of the Pelican
Marsh Co~umunity PUD district on Dece~er 9, 1997, and
WHEREAS, following said action adopting Ordinance No. 97-79, staff
was advised that certain pages, namely those nu~ered 8-10 through 8-14
inclusive of the PUD Document attached to said Ordinance as an Exhibit
were inadvertently omitted from the copy transmitted to the Department
of State a: d that their correction constitutes a scrivener's error.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners
of Collier County, Florida:
SECTION ONE: SCRIVENER'S ERROR AMENDMENT
Ordinance Number 97-9, the Pelican Marsh PUD is hereby amended to
add the omitted pages numbered 8-10 through 8-14 to the PUD Document
attached thereto, now attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the
Department of State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County, Florida, this day of , 1998.
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
BARBARA R. BERRY, Chairman
Approved as to Form and
Legal Sufficiency:
Mar]o~e M. Student
Assistant County Attorney
i Word. s:~ck through are deleted; words ~rlin~d . 0 1998
'1-
of t~ Environmen~ lmpg:t S~'ment (EIS) ~ to Division 3.8, Section
3.8.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code shall be d~ satisfied for
· ll futu~ a~tivities which take place within the Pelican biamb ~ PUD
bouml~es that requi~ Count5, permits for or Cou~ approval of development or
site alteration. This provision is based upon (1) approval of the Pelican Marsh
Commu_~i~/ application for Dcvelopmem of Regional Impact and thc Pelican
Ma_~h Comn:unity Environn~ntal ~upplement mbmit',.cd in conjxa:gtion with this
Application For Public Hearing for PUD l~_e_*one; and (2) the Pelican Marsh
Cotnmuniry PUD ElS submitted in conjunction with the Application for Public
He.~ng for PUD Rezone which was approved via County ~ t93-27.
~ provision shall apply to the Developer, its p~¢¢ssors, or assigns.
B. Pm's~nt to Cotlier County Land Development Co(re Article 3, Division 3.8,
Section 3.8.8, the Pelican Marsh PUD EIS cited in provision 8.10.A above shall
constitute Collier County's review and approval of all envizonmcntal re~xu'ces
and environmental quality i.. contzimd in t~ Pelican M~'sh Communky.,~,~
Application for Development of Regional Impact in so fax ts said
specifically pertain to lands contained within the Pelican Ma~ PUD boundaries
ts defmed via County Ordin,xnce ~'93-27.
C. Provisions 8. I0 A and B above do not relieve the Developer from provicling, or
foreclose the County from requesting, information relative to new or changed
env~onmen~ conditions on the site relative to species of special status
to Collier Coun~ Land Developnx'nt Code Section 3.8.5.4.1.$.d. and e.
D. The Collier Coum'y 'ST' overlay h~ been elin~ted and rep!*_c_-,4_ by
Unit Development, however all existing Collier County wellfield and/or
groundwater protection zones gl'mil remain in effe:t unless otherwise modifgd by
Collier County.
E. The Cocotm,,'hee Strand Mitigation Bank is bereby created and incorporated into
thb PUD by reference. The Cocohatchee Strand Restoration Plan 0N]~, Inc.
Fil~ No. ENV.88) depicts the improvements contemplated m-xler the Cocohatchee
S=-znd Restoration Progran'~ nnd itemizes in tabular form the Cocohamhee Strand
Mitigation Bm,~k features including mitigation ratios and aval~le credits for
impacts to Collier County jurisdictional wetlands. It is understood that
Mitigation Bm'tk may be required by regulating agencies. If such changes cause a
rzed to modify or revise the Cocolmtcbee Strand Restoration Program tod
revisions may be adn~inistratively approved by the CoUier County Development
Services staff.
F. In accon:tance with Policy 7.3.5 of the Comervatio I and Coastal
Element of the Collier Coumy Growth Ma.qagemem Scrub~.,~.SAre~
be relocated To the 'GCO" District and to the Xeric
FEB ! 0 1998
...... S-10
Compensation for lost habitst whose ext~'nt I~s be~m approved by ~ Florida
Gaz~ and Fre~ Water Fish Commission 0=GFWFC) shall be tn a~x:ordame ~
FGFWFC policy.
G. Collier Coun~ shall defer tll environmental permitttn~ re~ w~tland.s,
wedr, nd '.m~pacts, and wetland mitlgntion to South Florida Wa~r Maml~
District. The developer shill coordinate with and copy Collier Cc~tniy on
spproved permits.
8.1! SL~BDI'VIS]ON REQUI~9~.NTS AND ST.4~N'DARD DESIGN SUI~'I'rfI.~ONS
?e]i~.n ~a~h Conun~ shah be re~i~l to conform with tbe
improvement requizements set forth in CoLlier County ~nd Development Code Article 3,
Division 3.2, Section 3.2.8 unless otherwise stated in this PUD. The fol~owtng
substitutions to the improvemem standards are approved for lrmal Subdivision Plat
A. £idewall~tbike pafl~ ~hall conform with Sub~--.ion 3.2.8.~.I? ~xc~ ~ follo~:
1. Pelican Mamh Boulcva,rd ~ be ¢o~ider~! ~ ~ coll~m:~ ~'~ ~d
~1~11 b~ required to hav~ a ~id~tk or bi.k~ath on e~h ~i~ of d~
2. All other through ~tr~ shall I~ ¢omid~r~d local ~.~ ~d ~all be
requital m hav~ a ~idcWalk or bikepath on on~ ,id¢ of d~ ~'~.
3. All cul-d~-~..~ servin8 mom than £d~ {$0) $in81¢ family 1o~ ~h~ll be
r~quimd to hav~ ~ ~id~'atk or bik~th on om ~id¢ of tbe
4. All culqt~-~:$ ~'vtn8 flt~t {~0) or I~'~ $ingl~ f~m!!y Io~ ~ no~
requital to have ~ ~id~walk or bi~q~ada provid,d tl~ followi~ ~o~litio~
a. Th~ right-of-way .~on ~hall includ~ two t*.,~l~ foo~ {12') ~
~rav¢! lar~. and
b. tl~ gro~ density of th~ cul.d~-~a¢ ~hall be !~$ than two (1)
Ixr ~¢r~.
B. Privat~ ~tr~-~ ~hall conform with th~ rich,-of-way and pa~'n~m widfla
r~quircrn~nu of Sub~xion 3.2.8.4.16.$ cxeq~t ~ follow~:
1. Cul-d~-.~ md local ~m~ I¢.~ than on~ thom,and feet {1,000') in l~gda
ar~ r~quir~d to ha¥¢ · minimum for~j f~'~ ¢~0') risla-of-w~y width
two ten foot {10') wide Irav¢l la~. mbj~"~ ~ to tl~ c. onditkm~ of
FEB 1 0 1998
Pg; ,-~ _ ....._
2. All otizr cal-de-s~cs ~-~ m:l~ir~ to ~ a mlni~ ~ ~ (~') d~-
of-~y ~da ~ ~o ~ f~ (10') ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ m
~ ~idom of ~on 8.11.A.4 of ~ P~.
3. ~ o~r !~ ~ ~ ~ to ~ a ~ ~ ~ (~')
right.f-way ~ ~o ~lve f~ (12') ~ ~! ~.
4. ~ sidew~ d~i~ ~m~om ~ d~ ~ ~ 8.11.A.4 ~
~ P~, ~l~e-~ s~ s~ ~ve z min~ of ~ ~ f~
(12') wi~ ~vel ~.
C. ~e-u~ s~l co~o~ wi& ~ ~~ of ~ 3.2.8.4.16.6. ~
~y exc~ a len~ ofo~ ~o~ f~ (1~').
D. T~e~ ~n ~ ~ s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
3.2.8.4,16.10 exit on ~li~ ~h ~v~ w~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ve~-five f~c
E. S~t ~des ~y ex~ f~ ~ (4~) ~ S~ 3.2.8.4.16.14
p~vid~ ~t appli~ble ~o~ ~~ of T~m~ ~ of
U~fo~ M~ 5~ds ~T M~) ~ ~O ~ ~ ~.
F. R~ide slo~s wi~ p~va~ s~t figh~f-way ~y ~ ~o~ m a ~
of 3:1 ~ acco~e wi~ ~OT M~S, page ~-3~.
8.12 P~ R~E C~
~ exist~g P~ ~dge C~ wi~ ~ P~ ~~ w~ ~ ~1~ ~ ~ on
~ Pelic~ M~h Co~w M~r ~. ~ desi~ of ~ ~1~ ~
~o~ra~s features ~ed to ~lly ~tiga~ for ~y ~c~ ~h~ ~ i~
co~ction ~ elation of ~ ex~z~g c~. ~ s~l ~fo~ ~ ~ ~ ~
of ~gat~on credi~ es~blis~ u~r ~ C~o~ S~ ~~ ~.
~a~ze~;~ of ~e P~ ~dge C~I ~ ~s~ ~n~! s~ ~in ~
PMCDD.
8.13 DEDICATIONS
All dedicafion.~ of property or facilities for a public, pu~ose, whe~er by e.~emenl or
deed, may, at Developer's option, contain a condition limiting the use to raid public
i~rpo~. In addition, said dedication, at Developer's o~tion, roay contain · reverter
clause in the everu 0~e public purpose u.~ is di.r, comimied ' '
reasonable time period. The 'reasonable time* will be a
md tl~ ~tce .t thc ~ of tl~ dedication, it ~ ~ ~ of ~ ~
8.14 P~C~ ~ CO~ S~L ~
~ Peli~ M~ Co~ ~h~l St~ ~ sho~ on ~ P~ ~ ~
~bj~t m ~e fo~ow~ s~ ~ ~cfio~:
A. Pe~ U~
~ ~h~l si~ ~l o~y ~ ~rov~ for ~ ~ ~ a ~1
pu~s.
B. Bu~d~ Set~ck L~s. S~ of Bu~d~ ~ Bu~d~ Hei~
1. ~~~,~ckof~ys~ (~1~~,~
~en~-~ve (2~) f~ on ~ ~m ~ w~ ~ I~
(~0) f~t on ~e ~m ~ sou~m p~
2. No p~ip~ s~c~ of ~y ~ s~l exc~ ~ (3) ~ ~ ~i~
fo~ m ~ Collier Cou~ ~ ~1~ C~.
1. ~ u~ ~t cov~ by ~, ~ys ~ ~ ~
~ parent ~e of ~ ~ s~, ~o ~ ~ ~
~ I~on ~ by ~ ~o~ W~ M~~ ~ of
l~p~g s~ll ~ co~le~ at ~ ~ of c~ of ~
evide~ by ~ i~ of a ~iF~ of ~ ~ ~
D.
luger ~ ~n (10) f~ ~ ~ by fi~ (~) f~ ~ ~i~. ~ of
FEB 1 0
E. Exx~or Lighting
1. All exterior lighting for d~e school buildin~ shall be for
purpose of sffety a.ud security only ~ shall us~
installation and control techni~ to co~ain liiht wit~i~ tl~ School Si~
~ ellmi~t~ or mlnimi?e light spillage inio or ~ adj~em pr~ert~.
Tbere shall be no nlghv, imc lighting of athletic or m:rcatiomd playi~
f'~IcLs or courts or playgrounds wiflzin the School $1~.
F. Ou~loor Equipmem
1. ALI garbage and u'ash containers, oil tanks, boeded gas tanks, swlmmi%~
pool equipment and housing and sprinkler pu~ and othn' such outdoor
equipment must be underground or placed in walled-ia or sight-~,
fmc. ed-in areas so that they shall not be tm:lily visible.
2. For su'uctur~s at the maximum building, beight, all vents, stw. lcs,
mechanical equipment of any natar~ and type, sad other such ouuloor-
equipment located on roof a.r~as shall be sight-~ so tha~ they shall
not be readily visible from adjacent properties.
3. All active sports azeas including baseball, soccer, ~, footba.H,
eu:., shall be setback twenty-five (25) feet from the easterly and southerly
property lines.
8.15 NOTIFICATION OF PROXIMITY TO COUNTY FACU.,rr~
Developer shall include the following Notice in its sales contracts with purchasers within
PMC who ~e acquiring an interest in ~ property for rtsidential Imrposes fi'om
Develope: located within 500 lineax feet of rig closest lxnxt~la~ of th~ Cou~3t's
Wastewa~er Treatment Plant parcel on Go<xUene Road:
'This is to notify you that the property you are acquiring is located
within 500 linear feet of the property boundary of Collier
W~stewater Treatment Plant. This notification is mad~ at the
request of Collier Coumy."
The above notification will no longer be required when and if tlg County adOl~ an
ordinance or regulation addressing the subject; provi6ed however that Developer shall
comply with the requirements of said ordinance or rtgulation, where applicable.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PETITION NO. V-97-14 JOHN HOBART REPRESENTING FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF
NAPLES REQUESTING A 40 FOOT DIMENSIONAL VARIANCE FROM THE YARD
SETBACK REQLrlREMENT OF FIFTY (50) FEET FOR A STRUCTURE LOCATED IN A PUD
ZONING DISTRICT, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED 1N PELICAN BAY PUD, FURTHER
DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF PARCEL ONE, OAKMONT PARKWAY EXTENSION, IN
SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
The applicant wishes to construct a covered parking structure over two (2) parking spaces. The
subject site is an outparcel which fronts U.S. 41 and is developed with abank building, twenty-three
(23) parking spaces and a drive through area on the south side of the building. The parking spaces are
located at the northwest comer of the subject site. Each parking space is twelve (12) feet wide and
both face in a westerly direction, perpendicular to U.S. 41 to the east. The proposed structure will be
designed with four, comer columns constructed of concrete block and covered with material
architecturally compatible to the principal structure. The dimensions of the structure as scaled from
the site plan indicate that the proposed structure is twenty-eight (28) feet wide by approximately
twenty (20) feet deep. The structure will be open on all (4) sides and will be located ten (10) feet from
the north and west property line. The roof will be covered with tile which is architecturally
with the tile roof of the bank building.
compatible
C O N S I DJ72,.AILO2~
There are no special conditions and circumstances existing on site. The applicant simply wishes to
cover the two (2) parking spaces located in the northwest comer of the site. The PUD document
governing the dimensional criteria for development of this site requires structures to be setback at
least rift>' (50) feet from any property line. The applicant is imposing his own hardship by trying to
construct a cover over two (2) parking spaces, ten (I0) feet from the front and side property lines, on
a site which is already fully developed and functioning. The applicant's desire to add an additional
structure without meeting the setback requirements does not warrant undue hardship. The adopted
Pelican Bay PUD document contains specific setback requirements for buildings located in the
Community and Area Commercial land use areas of the PUD. All structures within the areas
designated as Community Commercial and Area Commercial are subject to the same setback
requirements. To grant the forty (40) foot yard setback variance as requested by the applicant shall
confer on the applicant a special privilege which is denied by the zoning regulations to other lands,
buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. Due to the dimensions and location ofthe
proposed structure and the layout of the site, it is unlikely the proposed variance request will be
detrimental to the public welfare. Additionally, the applicant plans to construct the building in a
manner which is architecturally compatible with the principal structure and surrounding commercial
development.
FEB 1 0 1998 moo
_._20:_ ---
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
The approval of this variance will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth Management
Plan.
~AEOLOGICAL IMPACT:
Staff's analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is locat~ outside an ar~a of historical and
archaeological probability ~ referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no
Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment is required.
PLANNING COMMISSTON RECOMMENDATION:
The CCPC recommends by a vote of 8-1, that the Board of Zoning Appeals approve V-97-14 subj~t
to the following stipulation:
The proposed structure shall be architecturally compatible with the existing bank building on site.
Note: the Plarming Commission's recommendation was based on a site plan originally submitted with
the petition which depicted a dome shaped canvas cover, supported by four comer poles. As
originally submitted, the proposed structure was not architecturally compatible with the principal
structure or surrounding development.
PREPARED BY:
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
REVIEWED BY:
ROBERT J. MULHERE, AICP, M~AGER DATE
C~NT PLUG SECTION
DONALD W. ~OLD, ~CP, DI~CTOR DATE
V~CE~ A. CA~ERO, AICP, ~M~S~TOR DATE
CO~TY DEVELOPME~ & E~O~E~ SVCS.
Petition Number: V-97-14, First National Bank
This petition has been tentatively scheduled for January 27, 1998 BZA Public Heating.
AGENDA ~ ?-E
MEMORANDUM
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DMSION
DATE: DECElv[BER 10, 1997
RE: V-97-14 - First National Bank of Napl~
AGENT/OWNER:
Agent: Mr. John Hobart, Architect
Rte. 1, Box 542-8
Micanopy, FL 32667
Owner: First National Bank of Naples
900 Goodlette Road North
Naples, FL 34101
~REQUESTED ACTION:
The applicant is requesting a forty (40) foot dimensional variance from the required .~tback of
fif~ (50) feet to ten (10) feet from the north and west property lines in order to permit a
canopy structure to be constructed over two (2) parking spaces. The Pelican Bay PUD
document, originally adopted by Ordinance # 77-18, requires structures in commercial areas
to be setback fifty (50) feet from any property line.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject site is located on U.S. 41, and can be further described as a portion of Parcel
"One", Oakmont Parkway Extension, in Section 33, Township 49 South, Range 25 East The
site is part of the Pelican Bay PUD, in the Community Commercial and Area Commeax:ial
land use district.
~ESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The applicant wishes to construct a dome-shaped canopy structure over two (2) parking
spaces in order to provide protection to those cars parked in the covered spaces. The parking
(12)spaces are l°cat ed at the n°rthwest c°mer ° f the sui?e' ei'~' l:'~eh ?°"t'h~i sPa~i~" "'"sis"' a"'feet wide and both face in al'~westerly~' directior, perl~~°[:'ES^°''^' .1 0 "-1998U'S 41 tt th'~'x~J~Jil~N 19~8 ' !
proposed canopy structure will cover both parking spaces. It will be constructed of canvas
material and supported by four (4) poles located at the front and rear of the parking spaces.
The dimensions of the structure as scaled fi.om the site plan indicate that the proposed
structure is twenty-eight (28) feet wide by approximately twenty (20) feet deep. The structure
will be approximately 9.5 feet in height. The canopy will be open on all (4) sides mad will be
located ten (10) feet from the north and west property line. The site is currently developed
with a commercial/professional type of structure which has a 4,500 square foot building
foot-pr-mt. The site has twenty-three (23) parking spaces and a drive through area on the south
side of the building. The site has approximately 193 feet of fi'ontage on U.S. 41 and is 193
feet deep for a total area of.85 acres. The site is part of the Pelican Bay PUD.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
Existing: Bank Branch Building - zoned PUD.
Surrounding: North - Existing Plaza Entrance; zoned PUD.
South - Retail Commercial, zoned PUD.
East - U.S. ,~l/'ramiami Trail fight-of-way.
West - Commercial/Retail Shopping Center;, zoned PUD.
HISTORIC/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT:
StaWs analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area ofhistor/cal
and archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map.
Therefore, no HistoricalLM'chaeological Survey and Assessment is required.
EXAI.,_U. ATION FOR ENWIRONMENTAL, TRANSPORTATION AND
INFRASTRUCTURE:
Approval of this variance request will have no effect on infrastructure, transportation or the
environment.
Section 2.7.5 of the Land Developme:~t Code grants the authority to the Board of Zoning
Appeals ('BZA) to grant variances. The Planning Commission is advisory to the BZA and
utilizes the provisions of Subsection 4) (a) through (h) which are general guidelines to be used
to assist the Commission in making a determination. Responses to items (a) through (h) of
Subsection 11,14 are as follows:
a, Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the
location, size and character/sties of the land, structure, or building involved?
No, the site contains a fimcfio~ng bank branch building and twenty-three (23) parking spaces.
a c~vas cover, open on four (4) sides and suppo~ ted b~*f~omer osts.
The PUD document governing the dimensional criteria for development in the Community
and Area Commercial portions of the Pelican Bay PUD requires structures in this area to be
setback at least fifty (50) feet from any property line. The applicant cannot construct the
desired structure, of the dimensions and in the desired location, without the use ora variance.
b. Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the
action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is
the subject of the variance request?
No, there a~-e no special conditions or circumstances related to the property. The applicant is
imposing his own hardship by trying to construct a cover over two (2) parking spaces, ten (10)
feet fi.om the fi.oat and side property lines, on a site which is already fully developed and
functioning.
c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this Land Development Code
work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant?
The literal interpretation of the provisions of the Code will not work unnecessary and undue
hardship on the applicant. The applicant's desire to add an additional structure without
meeting the setback requirements does not warrant undue hardship. It may be possible for'the
applicant to meet the setback requirement without the use ora variance by covering two (2)
parking spaces against the west side of the existing bank building (spaces 6 and 7, see
) submitted site plan), without the use of a variance.
d. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible
the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of
health, safety and welfare?
The apphcant is requesting the mix'drnum variance necessary in order to place an additional
structure of the size and in the location that he wants, however, reasonable use of the land is
possible and is presently occurring, without the use ora variance.
e. Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special
privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or
structures in the same zoning district?
Yes, the adopted Pelican Bay PUD document contains specific setback requirements for
buildings located in the Conununity and Area Commercial land use areas of the PUD. All
structures within the areas designated as Community Commercial and Area Commercial are
subject to the same setback requirements. To grant the forty (40) foot yard setback variance
as requested by the applicant shall confer on the applicant a special privilege which is denied
by the zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district.
The granting of the requested variance could be disruptive to the integrated an~ "
planned development which typifies the Pelican, ~,, ~rr~ ,.,a~f,~
f. Will granting the variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of
this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare?
No, reducing the property line setback requir~nent by forty (40) feet will not be in harmony
with thc general intent and purpose of the Land Development Code. Due to the dimensions
and location of the proposed structure and the layout oft,he site, it is unlikely, other than being
visually disruptive, the proposed variance request will be detrimental to the public welfare. If
the bank building and the proposed structure were built simultaneously, under cun'ent
regulations, both would be required to be architecturally unified through the use of similar
types of building materials, design, and style. The proposed structure is described by the
applicant as being a dome-shaped canavas roof supported by four (4) poles. The surrounding
buildings axe developed with orange baa'ell tile roofs, cream-colored stucco walls with white
trim, and decorative iron detail. Under current regulations, the subject structure would likely
be £ound arcb_itecturally incompatible with the surrounding development.
g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the
goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.?
No. There me no natural or physically induced conditions which ameliorate the goals and
objectives of the regulations. The existing ten (10) foot landscape buffer on the north and west
comers of the site may screen the structure somewhat, but the existing landscaping is not of
.) sufficient height or density, to adequately screen the proposed structure from the surrounding
properties.
h. Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan?
The approval of th/s variance will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth
Management Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition V-97-14 to the BZA with a
recommendation for denial.
Note:
Should the CCPC wish to forward this petition to thc BZA with a recommendation for
approval, staff recommends the CCPC stipulate their recommendation with the following:
Upon construction, the landscape buffers on the north and west property lines shall bc
enhanced to provide an opaque screen at least ten (10) fcct in height for a length ofthirty (30)
feet along the northern property line m~d forty (40) fcct along thc western property line.
1 0 1598
4
19. ! -
PREPARED BY:
'~USAN MLrRJLAY . DATE
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
REVIEWED BY:
' OB~RT J. MULHEKE, AICP DATE
CUR.KENT PLANNING SERVICE MANAGER
DONALD V~, ARNOLD, AICP I~,~TE
PL~ SERVICES DIRECTOR
VINCENT A. CAUTERO, A I C1% ADN~NISTRATOR DATE
COMHUNITY DEV.&ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS. DIVISION
Staff Report for the January 8, 1997 CCPC meeting.
Tentatively scheduled for thc January 27, 1997 BCC meeting.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANND~COMM/SSION:
M/CHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRPERSON
FEB 1 0 1998
VARIANCE PETITION
(VARIANCE FROM SETBAdK($) ~'" ''
PROJECT P~ER ~ U ~-~ ~; '~ ~ " ·
(~0~ TO BE FILLED IN BY STAFF) -
PETITIONER'S NA/ZE First National Bank of Naples
PETITIONER'S ADDRESS 900 Goodlette Road North
941/262-7600
Naples Florida 34101 TELEPHONE
AGENT'S A/DDRESS Rte.1, Box 542-8
Micanopy, Florida 32667 TELEPHONE 352/591-2505
A portion of Parcel "One"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: LOT(S) xxx BLOCK(S) xxx
according to Oakmont Parkway extension.
SUBDIViSiON xxx SECTION 33 TWP. 48 S RANGE 25 E
(If legal description is lengthy, i.e. metes & bounds
description, attach additional page)
CURR~NT ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Business
EXISTING LAND USE ON SUBJECT PROPERTY Financial
ADJACENT ZONING & LA.ND USE
ZONING LAND USE
N Business Business
S Business Business
E Business Business
W Business Business
MINIM%~.~ YAAD REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY
FRONT: 50 feet COP~NER LOT: NO/X~ (CIRCLE ONE)
SIDE: 50 feet WATERFRON LOT: NO/~ (CIRCLE ONE)
~FF.m~d~: 50 feet / 3 ~ /
AGEI~IT~. ~
JAN 1998
I FEB l0 1998
NATURE OF PETITION
Provide a detailed explanation of the request including what
structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of
encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback
from 25' to 18'; when property owner purchased property; when
existing principal structure was built (include building permit
number if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing
encroachment came to be; etc.
The variance request is to provide a canopy for only two (2) parking
spaces. There is one (1) building on the property, centrally located
and functions as a Branch Bank by the Petitioner. The two spaces are
located in the NW corner, 10 feet from the North and West property
lines. The spaces are approximately 200 feet to the West of North
Tamiami Trail and approximately 200 feet to the South of Ruby Tuesday
Restaurant, and seperated by the Shopping Center entrance road. To
West they are approximately 300 feet from Shops, with a vacant lot
to the South. Along the 10 feet of the NW property line and along
side the parking spaces is landscaping of shrubbery and trees. The
plant density could be dramatically increased to further restrict
the view of these spaces. Please refer to the attached photos.
Please note that staff and the Collier County Planning Commission
shall be guided in their recom~.endation to the Board of Zoning
Appeals, and that the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be guided in
its determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the
below listed criteria (1-6). (Please address this criteria using
additicnal pages if necessary.)
1. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing
which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics
of the land, structure, cr building involved.
The canopy that would be used is of a design with soft canvas, in
either earthtone or green in color, on slender bron=e supports. This
to blend with the landscaping rather then contrast with it.
2 FEB 1 0 1998
2. Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not
result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing
conditions relative to the property which is the subject of
the variance request. -
To the best of the Petitioner's knowledge, no special conditions
or circumstances result through this uariance.
3. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this
zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship or create
practical difficulties on the applicant.
A literal interpretation addresses structures and buildings.
The canopy we propose is open at all four (4) sides with the
canopy top providing for shade.
4. Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that
will make possible the reasonable use of the .land, building
or structure and which promote standards of health, safety
cr welfare.
The granting of this variance will be minimum in nature and
would provide the Petitioner with some degree of benefit.
5. Will granting the variance requested confer on the
petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these
zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures
in the same zoning district.
The granting of this variance the Petitioner does not recieve
any special privielge since covered spaces are allowed. The
exception here is that these spaces are within a setback
however they are shielded with landscaping. /~_~, /
6. Will granting the variance be. in harmony with the intent and
purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the
neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public
welfare.
It is the Petitioner's view that the canopy will not be
injurous to the business atmosphere that prevails in the area.
7. ~e there natural conditions or physically induced
conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the
regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course,
etc.
There are no conditions that ameliorate exisitng conditions.
8. %:i!i granting the variance be consistent with the growth
management plan
The granting of this variance will not affect the intent
of the Growth management Plan.
FEB 1 0 1998
V-97-14
September 29, 1997
Mr. Eric E. Sooley, Sr.
Facilities Manager'
Fir~ National Bank of Naples
900 Goodlette Road North
Naples, Florida 34101-3043
Re: First l';ational Bank of Naples; Pelican Bay Facility
De~r Mr. Sooley:
As a follow up to our meeting of Wednesday, September 24, 1997, the design and architectural
committee for the Pelican Bay Commercial District approves of your submittal to include ~vo
covered parking stalls on the Bank property at the location presented to us at that meeting. We
understand that an approval and permit for the covered parking structuxe will be necessary from
Collier County..
As we also discussed if approved by the County, the canopy and structural materials will be of an
earth tone color complimentary to the colors ofthe existing building improvements in the
commercial area. An.,,' shade of blue is not considered earth tone and is not acceptable to the
corPATIi tree, ~
Best of luck in your submittal process.
Senior Project Manager
...... t3 /
I, Gary L. Tice being first duly sworn,
depose
and say that I ~m ~he owner of the property described herein and
which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the
answers to the questions in this application, and all sketches,
data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part
of this application, are honest and true to the best of my
knowledge and belief. I understand this application must be
completed and accurate before a hearing can be advertised. I
further permit John ~obart to act as my
(AGENT'S NAME)
representative in any matters regarding this Petition.
State of Florida /
County of Collier
/
The foregoing Agreement Sheet was acknowledged before me this
~ day of October , 1996 by GaT L. Tice
XX , who is personally known to me or who has produced
as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
~~l.~ (Signature o~No~ary Public)
NOTARY PUBLIC
Commission #
State of Florida
County of Collier
The foregoing Agreement Sheet was acknowledged before me this
~~- day of October , 1996 by John Hobart
XX , who is_~__personally known to me or who has produced
as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
~os~: (Signatfire b~ Notary Publi )
~~ NOT~Y P~LIC
,~~~ Co~ission
~.~~ My Co~iss~on
S FEB 1 0 1998 998
1 RESOLUTION NO. 98- ,,
3 RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER V-97-14,
4 FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER
5 DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA-
6
7
8 WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125,
9 Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to
10 establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations
~! as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
12 WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land
13 Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes regulations
1~ for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County,
15 which is the granting of variances; and
16 WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected
17 constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public
~8 hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has
19 considered the advisability of a 40-foot variance from the required 50
2o foot front yard setback requirement to 10 feet to pezlnit a canopy to be
21 constructed over two (2) parking spaces as shown on the attached plot
22 plan, Exhibit "A", in a PUD zone for the property hereinafter
23 described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory
2~ provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable
25 matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section
26 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the
27 unincorporated area of Collier County; and
28 WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be
29 heard by this Board in public meeting assem~oled, and the Board having
3o considered all matters presented;
31 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPF2tLS of
32 Collier County, Florida, that:
33 The Petition V-97-14 filed by John Hobart, Architect, representing
34 First National Bank of Naples, with respect to the property
35 hereinafter described as:
36
37 A portion of Parcel 'One", Oakmont Parkway Extension, as
38 recorded in Plat Book 21, Pages 77-78, of the Public Records
39 of Collier County, Florida. ' AO~NDA~T~
P;. /d , - '
be and the same hereby is approved for a 40-foot variance from the
reguired 50 foot front yard setback requirement to 10 feet as shown on
the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", of the PUD zoning district wherei~
said property is located.
BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to petition Number
v-97-14 be recorded in the minutes of this Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
Done this day of ..... , 1998.
~o BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
~1 ATTEST:
~2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
1]
5 Cha i rma'~
16
17
~8 Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency:
19
20
Student
23 Assistant County Attorney
26
27
,
FEB 1 0 1998
EXHIBIT A V-97-14
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PETITION SPA-97-1, MR. R. BRUCE ANDERSON, ESQ. REPRESENTING DANIEL
AND BARBARA HOOVER, OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2452 J & C
BOULEVARD KNOWN AS TEO'S RESTAURANT, REQUESTING APPROVAL TO
SHARE A TOTAL OF 27 OFF-SITE PARKING SPACES LOCATED AT 6401 AIRPORT
ROAD KNOWN AS HADINGER CARPETS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 260 FEET
FROM THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY.
The property owners are requesting this off-site shared parking approval in order to
enable the tenant (Joe Dimassimo) to operate an existing restaurant ('l'eo's Restaurant)
with 150 seats.
¢,ONSIDER_ATION S:
The applicant is requesting this off-site shared parking approval on
behalf
of
the
tenant
(Joe Dimassimo) who operates Teo's Restaurant. Mr. Dimassimo, in order to obtain a
liquor license to serve alcoholic beverages other than beer and wine, increased the
number of existing seats at the restaurant to 150 seats. In 1995, he applied for, and
obtained Board approval to use a parking lot located adjacent to the restaurant as off-
site parking. Subsequently, the owner of the off-site parking property canceled the
lease and contracted to sell the parcel.
The Board of County Commissioners, on May 27, 1997, voted to nullify the existing off-
site parking agreement and directed the applicant to pursue an alternative parking
solution.
The restaurant requires 27 off-site parking spaces in order to comply with the parking
requirements of the LDC. The petitioner is proposing to utilize off-site parking spaces
located on Hadinger Carpet store property located at 6401 Airport-Pulling Road.
Hadinger property contains 50 parking spaces. Two businesses are located on this
parcel, a carpet store and a furniture store. These businesses require 43 parking
spaces. These businesses close at 5:00 PM. Teo's Restaurant, in actuality, requires the
use of this off-site shared parking predominantly on the week-ends and evenings when
the existing businesses are closed.
The Collier County Planning Commission reviewed this petition on January 8, 1998 and
- .
by a vote of 7-0 recommended approval. -- ,..~~
FEB 1 0 199B
FISCAL IMPACT;
None.
GROW~fH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
None.
~NNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Collier County Planning Commission reviewed this petition on January 8. 1998 and
by a vote of 7-0 forwarded petition SPA-97-1 to the BZA with a recommendation for
approval
PREPARED BY:
CHAHRAM BADAMTCHIAN, Ph.D., AICP DATE
SENIOR PLANNER
REVIEWED BY:
~iNCENT A. CAUTERO, A'C , ADMIN
COMMUNI~ DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
FEB 1 0 1998
2
AGENDA ITEM ?-A
MEMORANDUM
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
DATE: December 1, 1997
RE: PETITION NO: SPA-97-1
OWNER/AGENT:
Agent: R. Bruce Anderson, Esq.
Young, Van Assenderp & Vamedoe, P.A.
801 Laurel Oak Drive
Naples, FL. 34108
Owner: Daniel & Barbara Hoover
2452 J & C Boulevard
Naples, FL. 34109
REQUESTED ACTION:
The applicant is requesting approval to share a total of 27 off-site parking spaces
located at 6401 Airport-Pulling Road approximately 260 feet from the applicant's
property. This off-site parking is intended to allow for additional seating for Teo's
Restaurant, located on the applicant's property.
~E~IC LOCATION:
· The subject property is located at 2452 J & C Boulevard and is described as Lots 22 &
23 J & C Industrial.Park in Section !1, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier
County, Florida.
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The applicant is requesting this off-site parking approval on behalf of the tenant
(Joe Dimassimo) who operates a restaurant on the subject property (Teo's Restaurant).
The restaurant owner, in order to obtain a liquor license to serve alcoholic beverages
other than beer and wine, increased the number of existing seats at the restaurant to
150 seats. The applicant, in 1995 applied for and obtained approval to use a parking lot
located adjacent to the restaurant as off-site parking. Subsequently, the owner of the
canceled the lease and has contracted to s ~;
off-site
parking
property
has
'F,'"3 1 0 1998
1
The Board of County Commissioners, on May 27, 1997, voted to nullify the existing off-
site parking agreement and directed the applicant to pursue an alternative parking
solution.
This restaurant is in need of 27 parking spaces in order to comply with the parking
requirements of the LDC. The petitioner is proposing to utilize off-site parking spaces
located on Hadinger Carpet store property located at 6401 Airport-Pulling Road.
Hadinger property contains 50 parking spaces. The businesses located on Hadinger
property require 43 parking spaces. However, those businesses ( a carpet store and a
furniture store) dose at 5:00 PM. Teo's Restaurant will use this off-site parking lot
mostly on the week-ends and evenings when the additional parking is required and
those 2 stores are closed.
~zU..BJ?,D~ING LAND USE AND ZONING;
Existing: - Restaurant, zoned "1"
Surrounding: North - Multiple use industrial building, zoned '1"
East - Amerigas, zoned "1"
South - Automobile dealership, zoned C-4
West - Carini's Auto Sales, zoned "1"
~GROWTH MANAGEMENT pLAN CONSISTENCY:
The subject property is designated Industrial on the Future Land Use Map of the
. Growth Management Plan. The proposed request for shared parking is consistent
with the Industrial Designation of the Future Land Use Element of the growth
Management Plan.
I R AE G_ICAL IMPACT:
Staffs analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area of
historical and archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County
Probability Map. Therefore, no Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment is
required.
Section 2.3.5. of the LDC defines shared parking as: "off-site parking on property that
is normally not under the same ownerShip as the structure or use the parking, where
parking serves and is credited for land uses on two or more parties, and/or leased
parking, where credited space is excess to the parking requirements of the lot in which
it is located based on Section 2.3.16." The Board of Zoning Appeals shall base their__
determination of the request for shared parking on the following criteri~
FEB 3, 0 1998
pg:.._
( a. The proposed shared parking facility including its ingress and egress, is
safe and convenient for motorists and pedestrians:
All of the proposed shared parking spaces are within 300 feet from the entrance of
the subject facility. The parking is existing and functional. Staff is of the opinion
that the existing parking lot and ingress and egress are safe and convenient for
motorists and pedestrians.
b. The proposed parking facility will not adversely Impact the character and
quality of the neighborhood nor hinder the proper future development of
surrounding properties:
The proposed parking facility will not adversely impact the character and quality of
the neighborhood, nor hinder the proper future"development of surrounding
properties. Both uses and the parking facility.are existing. The petitioner does not
propose to further expand the existing parking facility.
c. The shared parking plan will have environmental, economic or traffic flow
benefits for the community:
This shared parking is intended to rectify an existing parking problem. It will
provide for more parking spaces to the patrons of Teo's Restaurant.
(
d. The shared parking plans will solve parking problems that were not created
by the owners or leasees of the subject properties:
The shared parking plan will provide adequate number of parking spaces for the
restaurant and compensates for the loss of parking spaces due to the revocation
of the previous shared parking plan.
e. Other more viable parking alternatives are not available for the subject
properties:
There are no other parking lots available within the required 300 feet to this
restaurant.
f, The operating hours, types of land uses, and other applicable factors are
conducive for shared parking at the present time and are likely to remain
constant:
The two land uses involved are Teo's Restaurant and Hadinger Carpet. Hadinger
Carpet is open daily from 8 AM to 5 PM. Teo's Restaurant is open daily from 8 AM
to 11 PM or '12 AM. Teo's Restaurant will need most of it's off-site parking for
dinner when the carpet store is closed. ~.~~
FEB 1 0 1998
3
g. Where the shared parking plan shows no land reservation or minimum of the
(10) year leased parking agreement, the petitioner has demonstrated that the
alternative parking plan is feasible at the present time and should be feasible
in the future:
The petitioners have provided staff with a ten (10) year leased parking agreement.
h. Failure of the shared parking plan and the alternative parking plan or the
minimum ten (10) year leased parking agreement would not have serious
implications on the public health, safety and welfare:
Should the leased parking agreement fail, the restaurant operator would be
required to scale back the operation (number of seats) so as to comply with the
available on site parking.
i. Approval of the petition will not create parking problems for'any neighboring
property:
Approval of this shared parking petition should not create any parking problems for
any neighboring properties.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition SPA-97-1 to the BZA with a
recommendation for conditional approval subject to the stipulations incorporated into
the Resolution of Approval.
4 FEB 1
PREPARED BY:
CHAHRAM BADAMTCHIAN, Ph.D., AICP DATE
SENIOR PLANNER
REVIEWED BY:
I~OB~'RT J. MULHERE, AICP, MANAGER DATI~ '
CURRENT PLANNING SECTION
DONALD W.-'--"~RNOL'~D,'~ICP, DIRECTO"-~ ~ DATE / '
ERVICES
VINCENT A. CAUTERO, AICP, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Petition Number: SPA-97-1
Staff report for January 8, 1998 CCPC meeting.
This Petition has tentatively been scheduled for February 10, 1998 BZA Public Hearing.
Collier County Planning Commi~-io'r~
MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN
~ RESOLUTION 97- ,
5 RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER SPA-97-1 FOR
~ SHARED PARKING ON PROPERTY HEREINAI'~ER
? DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
10 WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125,
11 Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to
~2 establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations
1~ as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development
15 Code {Ordinance 91-102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of
16 particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the
17 allowance of shared parking; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected
19 constituted board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing
20 after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has
2~ considered the advisability of shared parking as shown on the attached
22 plot plan, Exhibit "A", in an "I" zone for the property hereinafter
23 described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision
2% and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters
- 25 required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.3.5.6,
26 Section 2.7.5, and Division 3.3, of the Land Development Code for the
27 unincorporated area of Collier County; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be
29 heard by this Board in public meeting asses%bled, and the Board having
3o considered all matters presented;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPFJkLS of
32 Collier County, Florida, that the petition filed by R. Bruce Anderson,
33 Esquire of Young, van Assenderp & Varnadoe, P.A., representing Daniel
34 and Barbara Hoover with respect to the property hereinafter described
35 as:
Exhibit "B"
37 be and the same hereby is approved for a shared parking as shown on the
3s attached plot plan, Exhibit "A", of the "I" zoning district wherein said
, FEB l 0:998
I-
BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Nu~er
2 SPA-97-1 be recorded in the minutes of this Board.
3 This Resolution adopted al:er motion, second and majority vote.
4 Done this day of , 1997.
$
~ ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
7 DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
10
~x TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, Chairman
1] Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency:
15
x? Marjd~ie M. Student
18 Assistant County Attorney
20 f/$PA-9~-I ~$OL~I~/
21
I~ I
I' I
o
0 '~',.~-("c~(~ III
'- ---. ~ .~.~:
, __ ,~ ~ ' s. ,'
I
I
~ o~ ...... i-~
j $0C
I ,LK3,~VM JO ~
EXHIBIT "~" AIRPOT-m ~E~ 0 1998
Exhibit "B"
t
FEB 1 0 1998
~ESTRICTIVEC~
AND SHAItL~ PARKIN~ A~P~EM~I~T
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of
, 1998, by and between Daniel and Barbara Hoover, owners
of the property where Teo's Restaurant is located
Thomas F. Hadinger0 the owner of property upon which shared parking
facilities will be located ('Property Owner'l; and the Collier
County Board of County Commissioners (the 'Board").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Petitioners are the agent for Teo's Restaurant,
(hereinafter the "Subject Property'), more particularly described
as follows:
Lots 22 & 23 J&C Industrial Park an unrecorded Subdivision
Section 11, Township 49 S., Range 25 East, Collier County,
Florida;
and
W~EREAS, Teo's Restaurant requires additional parking spacers
because of a planned expansion of seating of the said restaurant
which will require an additional 27 parking spaces under the
Collier County Land Development Code ('LDC"); and
WHEREAS, the LDO pursuant tr' Section 2.3.5, defines two
of shared parking, joint and/or leased; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioners are requesting leased parking where
credited parking space on the lot which is served by said parking
exceeds that which is required by Section 2.3.14 of the Land
Development Code; and
WHE~-=AS, it is not practical to provide all of the required
parking in accordance with Section 2.3.14 of the Collier County
Land Development Code on the subject property due to the physical
constraints of the subject property; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner wishes to operate shared parking
facilities on land more particularly described as:
Lots 26 & 27 J&C Industrial Park an unrecorded Subdivision
sectio~l 11, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County,
Florida;
and
W~EREAS, the proposed shared parking will provide 27 spaces
which will meet the required parking for ~he sub'!eot property; an~
WH£AEAS, the ~oard has passed Resolution ~o 98-N~~g
tO Petition SPA-97-1, approving the proposed sha~ ~d parking subJec:
FEB i 0 1998
to the conditions set forth below.
NOW, TH£REFORE, in consideration thereof, the petitioners
Daniel and Barbara Hoover and Thomas F. ~adinger0 the owners of the
property upon which the shared parking facilities will be located
agree:
1. Th~ above recitals are true and correct and incorporated
herein by reference.
; 2. That the proposed shared parking ·re· shall never be
encroached upon, used, sold, leased, or conveyed for any
purposed except for the use in conjunction with
Subject Property and as provided in the "Lease Agreement
Shared Parking Lease" attached hereto ·nd incorporated bY
reference herein as Exhibit "A".
~ 3. That this Agreement constitutes a restrictive
4. Petitioners shall bear the expense of recording this
cf Agreement with the Clerk of the Circuit Cour~ which shall
bind the property owner and his heirs, successors
assigns.
5. That all of the requirements for · Boar~ of
Appeals determination for shared parking ha~e been ~et.
Dew
6. This Agreement supersedes and modifies any prior~arking
agreement which may have been executed between the Board
par~
and the then or current owner of the Subject Pro~er~y.
Land
7. This Agreement shall remain in full force and
CO~S
effect for the ten {10) year term set forth in the Lease
attached as Exhibit "A", or unless earlier terminated by
facil
the Board.
8. Th~s Agreement ~hall be voided by the Bo·rd if other off
street parking facilities are provided in accordance with
the requirements of Division 2.3, LDC.
9. That upon failure to conform to any of the provisions of
which,
this Agreement or termination Of the Lease attached as
Exhibit "A"0 this Restrictive Covenant and Shared Parking
to Peri
Agreement shall become void and of no effect and the
Petitioner shall be required to conform to all zoning
regulations for required parking as contained in the
AG
Collier County Land Development CO
FEB ! 0 1998
IN WiTNESS WM£REOF the parties hereto have set their hands and
seals the day and year first above written.
ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONIN~APPEAL~
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIE~t COUP, ~P~
/~e sses: ~ P~TITX .O~
State o~ F~o~i~
County of Collier
The foregoing Restrictive Covenant and Parking Agreement was
acknowledged before me by Petitioner, Daniel ~oover.
SWO~ TO ~ S~S~IBED before me?hi~ ~g day ~~ 1997.
Printed, ~ed or'Stamped Name
PETITIOn. -
State of Florida
County of Collier
The fore~oin~ Restrictive Covenan~C~nd p~~reeme~ w~
acknowledged before me by Petitionerj. ~~ ' ~+*/~
SWO~ TO ~ S~S~IB~ ~fore zhis S~ ~, 1997.
C0~1
~ 4-: ne s se s;//9
FEB ~' 0 !990
po. /S _
State of Florida
County of Collier
The foregoing Restrictive Covenant and Parking Agreement was
acknowledged before me by 7'~- ~& ~ Dl~;~m'9-- , the
owner of the land upon which the Shared Parking Fa¢ili~ies are :o
be located.
SWO~ T0 ~ S~S~IBED before me this ~ay ofD~ , 1997.
IL e.~,~ ~~~l Prin=ed, ~ed or S:a~ed
3
Co~imsion Nu~er
Approved as to Fo~
and Legal Sufficiency:
Mar-j~'i~ M. S~ud~ne
Assistant County Attorney
to
FEB i 0 1998
4
pg. ~"~'
EiVED
PETITION ~ S P A 9 ~ -1 ~A~s~lgned by Staff) Date SEP 2 9 1997
SDP ~ DP 9 ~-] l"~A~signed by Staff)
AGENT'S NAME (IF APPLICABLE)R, Bruce Anderson, Esa.; Youna. van
AssenderD and Varnadoe, P,A,
AGElqT'S ADDRESS 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300
N~Dles. Florida ~4108 T~L~P~O~ {~41)597-2814
For proposed Lma.e Parking provide the following info~a%ion for
each petitioner and their property.
Petitioner ~1 (N~e) JQe D~massimo
Property Address 2452 J & C Boulevard, Naples, Florida 341~9
TELEPHO~ (~4~)591-1557
Legal Description Lots ~2 & 23 J % C Industrial Park, Collier
cQun~y. Florida
Section 11 To. ship 4)S Range 26E
Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
ZONING
N i R&G plas~erinq
S C-4 Naples Dodqe
E I Ameriqa~
w I garini Auto Sales
Existing Land Use and Zoning: Restaurant. Industrial zoning'
Business N~e Teo's Re$~ura~t
Hours of Operation 8:00 a,m,.-l%:00 p.m. Sunday-Thursday. 12:00
Friday-SaturdaY
Re~ired % of On-Site Parking Spaces 75
Proposed ~ of On-SAte Parking Spaces 48
Proposed" of Off-Site Leased Parking Spaces 27 .:?~,7;
% of Total Re~ired Parking
FEB 1 0 1998
Petitioner %2 (Name) Thomas F. Hadincer and Hadincer Carpets. Inc~
Property Address ' - ' ~~
34109 TELEPHONE (941)566-7100 _
Legal Description:
the w 1/4 corner along the W line N 1829,95 ft.. E 5072,60 ft..~
the Point of BeginninG, North 173,16 ft., E 241.18 ft.. to the
westerly riuh=-of-way, $.R, South 31, along the riGht-of-wav_~
173.23 ~t.. W 256.10 feet to the Point of BeGinninG. Collie=
Countv. Florida.
Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
ZONINQ ~
N I Napl¢~ Pool S¢trice
s I Amer~qa$
E I ~irDort Roa~ "--
w I R&G Plastering
Existing Land Use and Zoning: R~ail Floor Covering Sale~
industrial zoninq
Business Na~ne Hadinqer Carp~$
Hours of Operation 8:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. Monday-SaturdaY ?
Required # of On-Site Parking Spaces 4~
Proposed # of On-Site Parking Spaces 50
Proposed # of Off-Site Leased Parking Spaces -0- (NOt ADDlicabl~
% of Total Required Parking -0- {Not Applicable)
Distance between furthest proposed Off-Site Lease~ Parking space
and your business (Measured by shortest feasible walking distance)
~9proxim~tely 260-265 feet (exclusive of ri.bt-of-waY)
FEB 1 0 1998
Summary of what you are proposing and why: Petitioner seeks an
Administrative Determination under Section 2.3.9 of the Land
Development Code that because of its location in the J & C
Industrial Park and its predominant customer base of owners and
employees of other businesses within the J & C Industrial Park,
that the applicable minimum parking ratio listed in the Land
Development Code should not be applied. One of the land use
rationales for permitting restaurants in industrial parks is to
serve other businesses in such parks and reduce the need for such
business owners and their employees to travel outside the
industrial park and impact the surrounding road network. In
conjunction therewith, Petitioner also seeks County Commission
approval of the Administrative Determination and approval of a
Shared Parking Agreement for Leased Parking. In support of both
approvals, Petitioner attaches and incorporates by reference herein
numerous letters from other businesses in the surrounding area
(including adjacent owners), as well as a letter from the Collier
County Sheriff's ot'fice, all of which affirm that the existing
parking for Teo's Restaurant has been sufficient in the past to
avoid any parking problems for any of the neighboring property
owners and businesses. Petitioner has entered into a Lease
Agreement, a copy of which is attached, with the owners of the
Hadinger Carpet Company located at the corner of Airport Pulling
Road North and J&C Boulevard. The Lease is for twenty-seven (27')
paved parking spaces, with the parking spaces available for us~e
after 5:00 P.M. If the County Commission approves the
Administrative Determination under Section 2.3.9 that the minimum
parking ratios should not be applied to Teo's Restaurant.,
Petitioner would ask that the Commission also approve the Off-Site
Shared Parking Petition without the requirement that the Petitioner
be required to provide replacement off-site parking at the
expiration of the Lease term or in the event the Lease is canceled
or terminated.
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT REVIEW CRITERIA
The Board of Zoning Appeals shall base their determination of
the requests for shared parking on the following review criteria.
Please provide an appropriate response to each of the below listed
criteria. (Please use additional sheets if necessary)
(a) The proposed shared parking facility, including its ingress
and egress, is safe and convenient for motorists and
pedestrians;
7he ~adin~r's Carpe~ Darkin~ lot ~as ~n entrance and exit o/t
j & .c ~o~__!~ev~r_d as well as on AirPQYt Road ap~ will Drov~e
~or aafe a.Dd conve_~ki~p%, access for motorists a~d pede$tria~l~
across J~...& C BQulevard to reach Teo's ReStaurant,
FEB 1 0 1998
(b) The proposed shared parking facility will not adversely impact
the character and quality of the neighborhood nor hinder the
proper f'uture development of surrounding properties;
lhe proposed shared Darkinq facility is an already improved
uarkinq lot which has not heretofore adversely impacted
~inq neiqhborhood nor hindered the Proper futu,~
~evelopment of surroundinq DroDerti~,
(c) The shared parking plan will have environmental, economic or
traffic flow benefits for the community;
The Plan will have economic benefits for the community in tha~
~ locally-owned business active in community charitab]~
cause~ Tec's Restaurant. will be able ~o remain in busines~
add maintain i%s existinc 150 seats (minimum recruirement fo~
restaurant licuor license) and thereby continue to serve i~
zustomer base within J & C Industrial Park, An environment~
consideration is the fact that instead of new impervious
~reas._existinq paved area will be utilized ~o handle overflow
Dark in~ if and when it should ever happen at Teo's Restaurant..
T~here are also traffic flow benefits for ~he community in tha~
the surroundin~ area business owners an~ employees who
patronize Teo'$ Restaurant. would otherwise have to us~
Airport RQ~d or o~her public roads to drive to a restauran~
~r ~_.~ea! ~at ~ey are abl~ ~o obtain Dow wi~hou~ ever
!gDvi__~n~ ~ & C Boulevard ~nd J & c Industrial Par~.
(d) The shared parking plan will solve parking problems that
were not created by the owners or lessees of the subject
properties;
Thee!an will solve a Parkin~ problem arising from the refusal
of the proper~y owner ~O ~h~ west of TeQ's to comply with
-4 -
t 0 1998
p~ior County approval and aqreement with Teo's to allow use of
~ts property for off-site parking to serve Teo's Restaurant..
(e) Other more viable parking alternatives are not available
for the subject properties;
Petition.er has explored all other ~arkin~ alternatives and th{~
use of the Hadin~er lot is essentially the only viable parkinq
alternative, in addition to an Administrative Detez-minatio~
under Section 2.~.9 of the LaDd Development Code,
(f) The operating hours, types of land uses, and other
applicable factors are conducive for shared parking at the
present time and are likely to remain constant;
The shared parking facilities would be available for use
after 5:00 P.M. when Hadinger's carpets closes and when mos~
of the o~her businesses in th~ J & C ~ndustrial Park woul¢~
also be closed. After 5:00 P.M, when the customers of Teo'~%
Restaurant may be more likely tQ include persons workinq
outside J & C Industrial Park, the shared Darkinc fa¢ilitie~f
would be available i~ ever needed.
(g) Where the shared parking plan shows no land reservation or a
minimum ten (10) year leased parking agreement, the petitioner
has demonstrated that the alternative parking plan is feasible
at the present time, and should be feasible in the future;
~o__t ADp!ica__b!__e_because the lease is for 10 years,
(h) Failure of the shared parking plan and the alternative parkin~
plan or the minimum ~en (i0) year leased parking agreement
would not have serious implications on the public health,
safety and welfare; and
!~9 .Lease is for a ~en (10) year period, however, by virtue
t__he r____e_quest for ~dmi~Dtrative approval under Section 2.3.9
the Code and ratification of that approval by the Commission~
R__etitioner h~s also demonstrated ~hat the shared parking i~
FEB I 0
not necessary at the present time and should not be necessary
in the futurg,
(i) Approval of the petition will not create parking problems for
any neighboring property.
The Darkinq will occur on an already imDroved Darkin~ 19_%
which serve~ a retail carpet business which closes at 5:Q_Q
P.M. each day, As evidenced by the letters from surrounding
proDer~¥ owners there is not nor has there ever been a DarkilLq
pro~!em for the 150 Sea~$ a~ T~o'~ Restaurant.
I, ,~D~ -/~/'/7)dSS'/'r~/3 being duly sworn, depose
and say that I am the~~ of the property described herein, and
which is the s~ject of the proposed hearing; that all the
answers to the ~estions in this application and all sketches, data
and other supplementa~ matter attached to and made a part of this
application, are honest and t~e to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I understand this application must be completed and
accurate before a hearing can be advertised. I further pe~it R.
B~ce ~derson, Es~ire to act as my representative in any matters
regarding this application. ~ J'
SIGNA~E OF O~R
State of Florida
County of Collier
The foregoin~ Affidavit was acknowledged before me this
/~ day of a;z~, ~J~) , 1997 by .~,~ /~i/))W~//~I~ '
who is personally Rnown to me. 8r %-ho ha~ pre~uced
....... M, !)7,
My Commission Expires:
SIGNAT~E OF AGE~
State of Florida
County of Collier
The foregoing Affidavit was acknowledged before me this
.-~/[ day of' ~~,~ __, 1997 by R. Bruce Anderson, who ~
per~naliy known to me.
E~.~~ EliZabeth M. Difli~ham
i~" ..]% ~~,~~s NOT~Y P~LIC
{/ ~9, ~ Commission ~CC422150
".~. ....... ~~'~~ My Commission E~ires: 1/9/99
FEB I n 1998
o ~'a ~ 7-1 ,,.,~" ~'
Collier ~un~ G~. ~mpl~ Bldg. - d ;
~1 Tamiami Trail ~, N~lel, FL ~112 SEP ~ ~ ~]
Te~phone (AC ~) ~~ '.
Mr. Joe DtMammo
TEO's Hot Do~, Inc.
2452 J&C Blvd.
Naples, FL 34109
To Whom It May C~c~:
F~ the rec~d, ~ ha~ not had c~pla~t, of pav~g ~olaH~ at 2452 J~ B~.
E~ on ~ca,i~s wh~ the b~, ha~ ~o~ ~d ~g actMti~, the mana~ ~
made cont~gency plans [~ ~ par~g and ha~ ~c~ legal ~v~g f~ ~ ~.
I~ I can a,ist ~h~, pl~se caH.
Sincerely,
Lt. K.C. Strickland
North Naple~ District Commander
(941) 597-1607
Gulfshore Supply, Inc.
2090 Elsa St. Naples, F1 34110
(941)566o3330
June 20, 1997
Collier County Commissioners
Na~les Flodda
RE: Parking at Teo's Restaurant
To whom it may concern,
Gulfshore Supply, Inc is located on Elsa St. within Pine Ridge Industrial Park. Because of our location,
myself, being the owner and the outside sales staffand drivers, all travel past Teo's close to fiVe times daily.
have never seen anyone parking on the street, or at any time felt the parking their was causing problems ~
roadway.
In fact, not even during their busiest lunches do I think their lot is in fact completely full. The people I
see eating there are people working at the IocaJ businesses in the Industrial Park, and travel within group:; in
one car at a time. Teo's allows you to fax or phone in your orders which makes lunches really easy. You walk
in and your food is ready to go.
AgairL, I don't experience any problems with Teo's parking.
AGENOA ITEM '~
n~.
FEB101998 J
America's Propane Company
6-20-97
Teo' s Restaurant
2452 J&C Blvd.
Naples, Fl. 34104
Att: Joe Dimassimo
Dear Joe,
Regarding the parking lot issue for your business, located at 2452 J&C
Blvd., Amerigas has been in no way affected by the parking situation and does
not have any immediate concern that this present situation should change.
It appears as if the current amount of parking spaces is sufficient
and to our knowledge the parking lot has never been overfilled.
Again, Amerigas has not experienced any interference with our business
because of your parking situation and does not see any reason for this to change.
If we can be of any further assisstance to you, Please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Jane Gretz
District Manager
JG; sk
FEB 1 0 19(,18
6387 North Airport Road - Naples, FL 34109 [941) 597-210
ALLIED CRANE SERVICE INC.
P.O. BOX 758~ · NA,P!~-~ FL 34109 - (941) 597-3445 · F.~,X (941) 597-4413
JUNE 23, 1997
TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS:
WE HAVE NOT WITNESS~ ANY PARKING PROBI _~ WHATSOEVER AT TEO'S
RESTAURANT HF_BJ~ ON J & C BOULEVARD.
SINCERELY,
FEB 1 0 1998
MACON, INC.
2477 J&C BLVD.
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34109
941-513-0808
TO: THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
RE: PARKING AT TEO'S RESTAURANT
TO WHOM 1T MAY CONCERN,
I HAVE HAD A BUSINESS LOCATED ACROSS THE STREET FROM TEO'S
RESTAURANT FOR ALMOST A YEAR. IN THIS YEAR I HAVE NEVER SEEN ANYONE
PARKING ON THE STREET AND. DUE TO THE FAST
SERVICE
THE
PARKING
LOT
HAS NEVER BEEN FULL, THE TURNOVER IS WAY TO QUICK. I HAVE NEVER HAD
PROBLEMS PARKYNG OR SEEN ANYONE ELSE HAVE. THANK YOU AND IF YOU
HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FEEL FREE TO CALL ME.
FEB 1 0 1998
po. R,q _
R & G PLASTERING, INC.
24 77 J& C BL VD.
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34109
(941) 566- 9167
TO: THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
RE: PARKJNG A T TEO 'S RESTAURANT
TO WHOM IT MA Y CONCERN,
WE ARE A NEIGHBORING BUSINESS THAT HAS BEEN LOCATED
A CROSS THE STREET FROM TEO 'S RESTAURANT FOR MORE THAN
OVER A YEAR. WE FREQUENT THE RESTAURANTA FEW TIMES A
WEEK AND DUE TO THE QUICK SERVICE, THE TURNOVER IN THE
RESTA ;..;RANT IS SO FAST I HA VE NEVER SEEN THE PARKING LOT
FULL AND NEVER HAD PROBLEMS PARKING. AS TO PARKING ON
TIlE STREET, I HA VE NEVER SEEN THAT HAPPEN. THANK YOU FOR
LISTENING AND IF YOU HA VE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS
,'~L4 TTER PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL US.
/...~H~ AN~YOU,
~"fflCE PRESIDF.~IT)
JGflll ·
FEB 1 0 1998
RECEIVED
LEASE AGREEMENT
SEP 9
SHARED PARKING LEASE
This Lease is made and entered into on this ~ I day of ,_"~'f'~J ]", ~ ,1997, by and
between Thomas F. Hadinger and Hadinger Carpets, Inc., or their successors (hereinai~er called
"Landlord"), whose address is 6401 Airport-Pulling Road North, Naples, FL 34109, and Teo's
Restaurant (hereinafter called "Tenant"), whose address is 2452 J & C Blvd., Naples, FL 34109. The
Landlord and Tenant hereby mutually covenant and agree as follows:
1.
Property at 6405 Airport-Pulling Road North, Naples, FL 34109, and legal described as Section
11, Township 49, Range 25, commencing at the W 1/4 comer along the W line N 1829.95 f~., E 5072.60
ft., to the Point of Begirming, North 173.16 ft., E 241.18 ft., to the westerly Hght-.of-way, S. R. South 31
along the right-of-way S 173.23 ft., W 236.10 feet to the Point of Beginning, which is the northwest
corner of Airport Road arid J & C Boulevard, the add-ess of which is 6401 Airport-Pulling Road. North,
Naples, FL 34109.
2. Location and Grant
For the rent and upon the agreements contained in this Lease, Landlord leases to Tenant and
Tenant rents from Landlord the southwest 27 parking spaces, which front J & C Boulevard at the comer
o£Airport Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida and commencing at the most westerly parking space on
J & C Boulevax-d proceeding east to Airport Road thence north along and facing Airport Road.
3. Term and Commencemtn.t
Term: The initial term ofthis Lease shall be for a period often (10) years and shall commence on
the 1st day of September, 1997, (the "Term Commencement Date"), and shall terr lmatg~.a~.._.2~ _,~)y o~
Page 1 of 4 Pages FEB 1 0 1998
August, 2007, (the Termination Date"). This Lease is renewable by Tenant on no less than three (3)
months' notice from Termination by Tenant on such terms as are necessary and agreeable.
4. Rent
a. Except as otherwise provided herein, Tenant does hereby covenant and agree to pay the
Landlord, beginning on the Term Commencement Date and in lawful money of the United States,
without demand or deductions, at Landlord's address set forth above, or at such other place or
party as landlord may from time to time direct in writing, the following which are collectively referred to
hereinafter as "Rent", plus any and all sales tax due thereon uncler Florida law, which provided that sales
tax must be paid on all amounts paid by the Tenant to the Landlord hereunder.
b. During the Term of this Lease, Tenant shall pay to Landlord a Basic Annual Rental
("Rent") of $10.00 per month per parking space, hence $270.00 per month.
c. This lease is cancelable by either party on 90 days written notice to the addresses above.
5. Parking Spaces
These parking spaces may be used ordy after 5:00 p.m. If required by Collier County, Tenant
may erect a sign on the Property identifying the parking spaces for the use of Tenant's guests and
invitees.
Tenamt agrees to carry liability insurm~ce covering the leased premises in the amount of One
Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) naming Landlord as an additional insured. Tenant agrees to cover any
and all legal fees and judgments that may be incurred by Landlord as result of any incident or damage
occurring as a result of the use of these parking spaces by Tenants that may cause Landlord to be sued or
incur legal expenses.
Page 2 of 4 Pages FEB I 0 1998
The parties hereto have signed this instrument on the date fa'st written above.
Thomas F. Hadinger
HADINGER CARPETS, INC.
By:~
Thomas F. Hadinger, as Pres
TEO'S RESTAURANT, INC.
/ Authorized Representative
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF COLLIEI:L
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .~,.../m day of J'~/,, '~,
1997, by Thomas F. Hadinger, who is / personally known to me, or who has produced
' - _ as identificanon, and who did/did not take an oath.
Printed Name: ~
Commission No.:
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF COLLIER,
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of t,/"l,/1- ~',
1997, by Thomas F. Hadinger, as President of Hadinger Carpets, Inc., a Florida co ~
Page 3 of 4 Pages FEB 1 0 1998
thc corporation. He is ~ personally known to me, or produced as
identification, and did/did not take an oath.
Commission No.:
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF COLLIER,
The fgregoirl, g instrument was ac*knowledged be, fore me this .,~ / day of ~/,. ~ _,
1997, by ~ /~..,~,,/r~ ,ofTeo s Restaurant. (s)H~is ' personally known
to me, or ~ produced as identification, and did/did not take an oath.
Notary Public
Printed Name: ~
Commission No.:
Page 4 of 4 Pages FEB 1 0 1998
EXECUTIVE SUIVIMARY
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE TIME FOR WHICH AN ASPHALT AND CONCRETE
BATCH PLANT FACILITY MAY OPERATE AS A CONDITIONALLY APPROVED USE IN THE
"A" RL.~,AL AGRICULTURAL ZOI'KNG DISTRICT FOR PROPF. JI. TY HER.EINAFr~[
DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FI,ORIDA.
OBJECTI~,rE:
The conditions of approval of this conditionally authorized use of land for an Asphalt and Concmt,.~
Batch Making Facility required reconsideration after the expiration cfa five (5) year time period. This
petition therefore seeks to obtain an extension of the time period to allow continued operation of said
facilities.
CONSIDERA. TIONS:
Resolution 88-31 adopted January 26, 1988 authorized approval of a conditionally permitted use of
land, namely an Asphaltic Concrete Batch Plant in the "A" Rural Agriculturally zoned district as then
permitted by provisions of Zoning Code (Ordinance No. Said
82-2).
provisions
provided
that
approval
would expire a~er five (5) years unless reviewed following procedures for obtaining reconsideration
and approval of the Board of County Conmfissioners, and further provided that any applicable f**
requirements be waived for any application for reconsideration.
Resolution 93-138 adopted March 30, 1993 efrectively extended said approval an additional five (5)
years. Events which are relevant to any reconsideration for approval should take into account th,~
following.
1. Provisions of the Land Development Code relative to the conditional use of property in th.~
Rural Agricultural district by an Asphaltic Concrete Batch Making Plant have changed.
Whereas the former provisions provided for expiration of said conditional use after five (5)
years or otherwise provided an opportunity to request an extension, the new provisions do n~t
provide any time limit for the operation of an A~haltic and Concrete Batch making plant. The
presumption is that the current requirements of the Land Development Code intended to
provide opportunities for an Asphaltic and/or Concrete Batch making plant to permanently
operate in a Rural Agriculturally zoned district subject to conditions precedent to tach an
approval, however, this is not to say that a time limit on a conditional use cannot be imposed.
2. Recently, the County Board of Commissioners approved the extension of earth mining
activities on an additional two hundred (200)acres of land contiguous to tiffs, '' ,,~
of this action is to extend the life or time frame for earth mining activities a significant number
of years, thereby, providing an immediate source of raw materials for said "batch" making
facilities.
This consideration is dissimilar to that which authorizes the Board of Zoning Appeals to grant
extensions to conditionally approved land uses which have not commenced construction but rather
deals with a development order approval stipulation, namely, that the Board of County Commia$ioners
reconsider their action to approve the conditionally authorized use of la.nd for an Asphaltic Concrete
Batch making plant upon the expiration of five (5) years of its approval or extension thereof.
In the opinion of staff the petitioners request that the operation of the Asphaltic and Concrete Batch
Plant be tied to the life of aggregate mining and processing has considerable merit, particularly in view
of the expanded area of mining activity which provides an expanded area of separation between batch
plant operation and land that is not pan of the earth mining land area. No particular objective is .~.*rved
by requiring reconsideration of the batch plants at an intermediate stage in the mining and processing
of aggregate material, that is not readily apparent today in terms of its potential impact on surrounding
land that is not pan of the property for which earth mining is now approved. The concern for
compatibility can be reinforced by requiting no sale of land that is now part of the total land area for
which earth mining is now permitted until such time as earth mining activities cease and the batch
plants removed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Nolle.
GROWTH MANAGESIENT IMPACT:
None.
ST.~F RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Zoning Appeals approve the continued operation of an Asphaltic and Concrete Batch
Plant as provided in Resolution 93-138, and further that Resolution 93-138 stipulation "g" be deleted
and replaced with a Stipulation which would allow the continued operation of an Asphaltic and
Concrete Batch Plant for a period of time equal to that of aggregate mining and processing and fitrther
that no land that is now part of the conditional uses for earth mining be conveyed for other purposes
(other than to a land trust for the perpetual reservation of preserve areas) until earth mining ceases and
the Asphaltic and Concrete Batch Plants are removed.
FEB 1 0 1998
P, REPARED B~' '
ROl~IAL]~ F. NIN0, AIcp .... DATE
CHIEF PLANNER
REVIE~ED BY:
DONALD W. ^~O~.D, MCP' '"-- ' DATE
PLANNING SERVICES~DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
~INCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNITY DEV. AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS.
EXTENSION OF ASPHALT & CONCRETE PLANT EX SUMMARY/md
FEB 1 0 1998
December 1!, 1997
Ron Neno ... ·
Planing and Zoning "~'~'~
Collier County
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr.
Naples, FL 34104
Dear Ron:
Our Conditional use "14" of Rural Agricultural Zoning for
Portable Asphalt and Concrete Batch Plant is up for 5 year
renewal by March of "98".
We would like to petition the County Board of Co~nissioners for
renewal of this Conditional Use.
At this time we would also request that the Conditional Use be
extended to the life of the quarry.
Over the past 10 years we have operated the concrete and asphalt
plants without complaint. Due to adding environmental
regulations and the Countys' land use plan we do not see any
surrounding developments that will cause complaints of
incompatibility.
Also a recent 200 acre quarry expansion has increased the buffer
area around the plants.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Willow Run Trust
Enclosure
1 0 1998
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 93-138 FOR
THE PURPOSE OF DELETING THE STIPULATION
PLACING A FIVE (5) YF2%R EXPIRATION ON A
CONDITIONAL USE FOR AN ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
BATCH PLANT UNLESS OTHERWISE EXTENDED BY
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPF. ALS AND
SUBSTITUTING THE STIPULATION WITH A
REQUIREMENT TO ALLOW THE CONTINUED USE OF
ASPHALT AND CONCRETE BATCH PLANT FACILITIES
FOR A PERIOD OF TIME EQU~L TO THAT OF THE
EARTH MINING ACTIVITIES, FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED IN SECTION 11, 12, 13 AND 14,
TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 FAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246,
Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all
counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning
and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the
public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development
Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular
geographic division of the County, among which is the granting of
Conditional Uses, and placing conditions thereon; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to those authorizations the Board of Zoning
Appeals adopte~ Resoluticn 93-138 which approved a conditional use for an
Aspha]tlc Concrete Batch Plant in the (A) Rural Agricultural zoning
district Subject to the provisions of Stipulation -g,, contained within
Stipulation "a" of said Resolution which placed a five (5} year
limitation on the operation of said COnditional use unless renewed by
action of the Board of Zoning Appeals; and
WHEREAS, all interested Parties have been given opportunity to be
heard by this Boaro in Public meeting assembled, and the Board having
considered all matters presented;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS of
Collier County, Florida, that:
The Petition filed by Joseph D. Bonness III of Better Roads, Inc.,
representing Joseph D. Bonness III as Trustee for the Willow Run Land
Trust, requesting an extension ¢,f time for operating
by a period time equal to that of associated earth mining conditional
of
use approvals be approved subject further to the following conditions:
1. This project remains subject to all of the stipulations
associated with Collier County Resolution No. 93-138,
Resolution No. 89-7, and Resolution No. 88-31, with the
exception that Stipulation "q" is hereby deleted and
replaced as follows:
a. Stipulation "q": This Conditional Use may remain
in effect for as long a period of time as is
required by associated earth mining activities
including those approved by Resolution 97-393
except that the total land area of all associated
earth mining conditional uses shall not be diminished
in area by conveyance to another owner/entity other
than to a land trust for the perpetual reservation of
preserve areas or until such time as the operation
of the Asphaltic Concrete Batch Plant ceases and is
removed from the subject land.
BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of
this Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
Done this day of , 1998.
ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPF2tLS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, ~LORIDA
BARBARA B. BERRY, Chairman
Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency:
Mar j c~ie M.
Assistant County Attorney
f/£on/~lzolu~on
R~SOLUTION 97- 393
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE EST~.BLISHMENT
OF EXPANDING THE WILLOW R~N QUARRY
~2%RTHMINING BUSINESS CONDITION~ USE '1' IN
THE 'A~ AGRICULTUPJtL ZONING DISTRICT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2.l.3 OF THE COI, LIF. R
COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY
LO~TED IN SECTIONS 11, 12, 13 & 14,
TOWNSHIP 59 SOUTH, P. ARGE 26 F2~T, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHERF2%S, the Legislature of tho State of Florida in Chap=or
67-1246, Lsws of Florida, and Chap=ar 125, £1orida S~&tutea, has
conferred on Collilr County =ho power =o establish, coo=din&ti and
enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for tht
protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto hA1 adopted a Land
Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which includel a
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regula~iona for the
zoning of particular geographic divisions of the Couz~ty, a~onge~
is the granting of Conditional Uses; end
WHEREAS, ~he Collier County Planning Commission, being =he duly
appointed and constituted planning board for =ho aria hereby
affected, has held · public hearing al=ir notice aa in said
regulations made and provided, and hal considered =ho edVllablliZy o:
Con~i:lonal Use "~~ ex=faction or esrthauLning, and rile=ed processin~
proper=y, of Section 2.2.2.3 in an 'A~ Agricultural zone for
expanding :he Willow Run Quarry esr=km/ning business on =he pro~e~y
concerning all applicable ~=terl re~irld by said re.lateens and i~
accordance with Subset:lin 2.7.4.4 of thl ~nd ~vllo~n~ C~i fo=
the Collier County Planning C~ll~on; and
be heard by this Board in a public meeting a~
having considered all ~tt~rm prement~.
FEB 1 0
-1-
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS c
Colli,er County, Florida that:
The petition filed by Bruce E. Tyson, ASLA of Nllson, MAllet,
Barton & Peek, Inc., representing Willow Run Trust with respect to
the property hereinafter described as:
SE ~ of NE ~ 11-50-26 40 + ac.
NE ~ of NE ~ 11-50-26 40 ~ ac.
SW ~ of NW ~ 12-50-26 40 + ac.
NM N of NM N 13-50-26 40 + ac.
NE % of NE ~ 14-50-26 40 + ac.
Total 200 + ac.
be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Use
extraction or earthmtntnq and related processing and production not
incidental to the agricultural devalo~aent of :hi properl~y, Of
Sec=ion 2.2.2.3 of the "A" zoning district for expanding the Willow
Run Quarry earthmining businlss in accordance with the Conceptual
Master Plan (Exhibit "B") and subJlct to the following condittonl=
a. The Planming E Technical Services Manager may approve
m~nor changes in the location, siting, or height of
buildings, strut:urea, and improvements authorized by
the conditional use. Expansion of the uses identified
and approved within this conditional usa application,
or major changes to the site plan sukm~itted as part of
this application, shall require the submittal Of a new
conditional use application, and shall co=~ly with
applicable County ordinances in effect at the ti~a of
submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Devalo~nt
Plan Review and Approval, of the Collier County Land
Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102).
b. Prior to issuancm of %he Excavation Permit, applicant "
shall submit a Geological Report with borings showi.ng
depth of confining layer, if such a layer exists.
Conclusions in the report will be verified by County Staff.
Lak~ depth will be limited to 50' or tO the confining
layer, whichever is shallower.
c. The Petitioner will obtain the necessary ~ermits from
the Army Corps of Engineers, the South Florida Water
Management District and the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection.
d. Prior to issuance of the excavation permit, or by
September 1, 1997, whichever comes first, the applicant
shall submit a water qualAty monitoring plan fog salinity.
The plan shall be in effect un:ti it has ~en decided by
County Staff =hac no adverse ~ac=s a~e oc~r=in~.
e. The Pail:loner shall re~ain fif~eenp~
exia:ln~ native ve~eta:ion on
3.9.5.5.4.,
f. Environmental permitting shall be in ac¢orc~ance with
the State of Florida £nvironmental Resource Penait
Rulem and be subject to review and approval b
Plannin Env ¥ urrent
g ironmental Review Staff. Re,oval o£ exotic
vegetation shall not be counted towards mitiqation for
impacts to Collier County Jurisdictional wetlands.
g. Buffers shall be provided around the wetlands,
extending st least fifteen {15) feet landward £rom the
edge of wetland press=yes in all places and averaqing
twent¥-five(2$) feet from the landward edqe of the
wetlands. ~here natural buffers are not possible,
structural buffers shall be provided in accordance with
the State of Florida Environmental Resource
aules and be subject to review and approval bM
Planning and £nvl=onmental
h. An exotic veqetation removal, monitorin~, and
maintenance (exotic free) plan for the site, with
emphasis on the s=eas of P=ese~vation, shall be
submitted to Cu=rent Planning and Enviromaental S~a£f
~or review and approval prio= to issuance of an
A~ricultural Clea=in~ Permit.
i. Petitioner shall comply with the guidelines and
recom=~end&tions of the ~.S. Fish and #lldlAfe Service
(userS} and Florida 6ams and Fresh ~ater Fish
Commission (FGF~FC) reqardin~ poten~ial ~acte
Protected wildlife species. ~here P~Otect~d species
are obsezved on site, a Habitat Hanagement Plan
those P=o.tected species shall be submitted to Currant
Planning £nvi~onmental Staff for review and approval
prior to 'issuance o[ an Agricultural Clearinq Permit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in
the minutes of this Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second a~d majority vote.
BO,~J~D OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
~ ! ~W~GH~E.. BROC~'
~.. ~:~.' ~Y/ ..... ~ .~
· ~ '- ... ,...~., ~ .,.:, ,., ,~ . ·
Assistant County Attorney
FEB 1 0 1998
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-97-1~
The following facts are found:
1. Section 2.2.2.3.1 of the Land Development Code authorized
the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the
public interest and will not adversely affect other property
or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of~
A. Consistency with the ~and Development Code and Grow~:h
Management Plan: Yes ~/ No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed s=ructuree
thereon with particular reference to automotive and
pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and
control, and access in cas~
~/of f~re or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress& egress
Yes VNo
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise,
glare, economi- pr odor effects:
. _ No~ffect or Affect mit/gated by
_ Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other
property in the district:
Compatible use within district/
Yes ___.._No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with
stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recor~,,,ended for
approval
F/CU-9?-X~ FINDIN~ OF FACT C~AIPJ4~N/
FEB 1 0 1998
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNIN~ COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-97-1~
The following facts are found:
1. Section 2.2.2.3.1 of the Land Development Code &u=horized
the conditional use.
2. Granting 'the conditional use will no= adversely affect: the
public interest and will not adversely affect other pr~per~
or uses in the same district or neighborhood be=arise
A.Consistency with the Land Development Code and
Growth Management_~:
Yes No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed
structures thereon with particular reference
automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,
traffic flow and control, and access in case of
catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & ~ess
Yes ~ NO _ ,
C. Affecns neighboring properties in relation to nc)ise,
glare, ej~onomic or odor effects:
~' No affect or
Affect m~=igated by
Affect cannot be mitigated '
· D. Compa=ibility with adjacent proper=Sas and other
property in the district:
Compa=ible use )~ithin
Yes ~ No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, wi~h
stipulations, (copy a=~ached) (should.mamA be~r~c~ed f~
approval
FINDING OF FACT
COLL?E~ COUNTY p~~ C~ISSION
FOR
A CO~ITIO~ USE P~I~ON
FOR
. ~- 97
~e following fac=s are
1. Section 2.2.2.3.1 of =he ~d Develo~n~ C~e au~riz~
~he condi=io~l use.
2. Gr~=ing 'the
condi~ional use will
p~lic i~eres= and will
no= a~ersely affe~ o=~r
or use~ in the same dis~ric= or neig~r~ ~ca~e of~
A.Consis=en~ wi~h =he L~d Devel~n~
Grow=h M~ageme~l~
Yes ~ No
B. Ingress ~d egress
a=~C=~ea =her- .....
~raffic ~ muueacrl~ sa=eCy ~ co~~e,
flow and conUrol ~d access
ca=as=rophe: ,
~e~a=e ingresS&
Yes ~ No
C: %ffec=s neig~oring
glare,~conomic or odor effec=s~
~ No affec= or
~ Affec= c'~o~
D. Co~atibiltty wi=h adJac
Yes No
Based on =he ~ve f~nd~ngs,
s=ipula=io~, ~copy a==ached) (shoed no=) ~ reco~ed for
approval
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNIN~ COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITION]%L USE PETITION
FOR
CU-97-1~
The following facts are found:
1. Section 2.2.2.3.1 of the Land Development Co4e au~horizm~
the conditional uae.
2. Granting the conditional use will not a~vmrsely affect t. he
public interest and will not adversely affect other properS:
or uses in the same district or neighborhood because
A.Consistency with the Land Develol~nent Co~e ~
Growth Manag~:No ,
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed
structures thereon with particular reference to
uto_motive and pedestrian safety and convmnience,~
raffic flow and control, and access i~ case of
catastrophe:
Adequate
C. Affects ne ig~o~r~i., in relation to noi..,
glare,/~~~ or odor effects:
~ ~ No__affect or Affect micigaced by
~"2---'"- AZfect cannot be mi=iga:ed '
· D. Compatibility with adjacent proper:les and other
in
property =he_~rict:
Compat lb .~-us m~"~ t hin district
Based on the above findings, this conditio~al use should,
stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be reco~m~ for
approval ___~~/~
:__ 9/4/9?_
FEB 1 0 1998
FIKDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNIN~ COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CU-97-1~
The following facts are found:
1. Section 2.2.2.3.1 of the Land Development Code authorized
the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not a~versely affect the
public interest and will not adversely affect other proper~y
or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of~
A.Consistency with the Land Development Code
Growth Management
Yes No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed
structures thereon with particular reference to
automotive and pedestrian safety an~ convenience,
traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or
catastrophe:
Adequate ingress
Yes ,, w No ..
C. Affects. neighboring properties in relation to noise,
glare,.~-~Dnomic or odor effects:
¥ No affect or . Affect mitigated by
Affect cannot be mitiga=ed
· D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other
property in the
Compatible u~e~hin district
Yes ~,' No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, w~th
stipulations, (copy attached) (s~~~-be re~nded for
approval .
FINDING OF FACT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIC~
FOR
A CONDiTION]iL USE PETITION
CU-97-1~
The following facts are found:
1. Section 2.2.2.3.1 oE the Land Development Code auChorized
the conditional use.
2. Granting '=he conditional use will no= adversely af£ec=
public in=crest and will not adversely af~e¢c ocher
or uses in the same districC or neighborhood because
A. Consistenc~ with the Land DevelopmenC C~e ~
Gro~h Managemen=~oYes
· =~c=ures thereon with p~i~ar refer~=e =o
traffic flow ~ conc~l, ~ access ~ c~e of
cacascrophe:
~e~a=e in~os~ &. ~eea '
Yes ~ No
C. ~feccs neig~oring p~pe~iee in ~laCion Co nolae,
glare, eco~c or o~r effecca~
... ~fecc c~o= be
D. Co~atibility with adjacent p~e~ims ~
proDe~y in the district:
Co~atible ~ ~h~ diaC~cC
Yes ~~
Based on ~he ~ove f~n~s, ~s co~=~ ~e ~d,
s=ipula=io~,~ (co~ a==a bed) ~ ~- _ z=_. ~ raco~ for
RE$OLUTIO~ ~- 1}8
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISBF~2~T OF
A PORTABLE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE BATCH PLART
CONDITIONAL USE IN THE RUl%%L AGRICULTURAL (A)
ZONING DISTRICT P~ASUARTTO SUBSECTION 2.2.2.3.14
OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
W~EREAS, the L~giala'~ure of the State of Florida ~n Chapter
~7-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, baa
conferred on Collier County the power to establiah, coordinate and
enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for
the protection of the publics and
WHERF. AS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land
Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which includes a
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the
zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among
which is the granting of Conditional Usaa; and
WHEal-AS, all interested partiea have been given oppor~:unity
=o be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the
Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
of Collier County, Florida that:
The petition filed by Joseph D. Bonness III of Batter Roads,
Inc., representing Joseph D. Bonnmse III as Trustee for the Willow
Run Land Trust, with respect to the property hereinafter
Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and incorporated by
reference herein
be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Use "14" of the
Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district for a poz~cable asphaltic
concrete batch plant in accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan
(Exhibit "B") and subject to the following conditions:
a. This project shall be subject to all of the stipulations
associated with Collier County Resolution.~. 9~_?._~.. ·
Collier County Resolution No. 88-3~ with
of Stipulation "q." and Stipula~ion "t."
revised to read aa follows:
--1~
Stipulation 'q." - This Conditional Use shall expire
five (5) years after the effective date of approval of
this Conditional Use or upon expiration of the
excavation permit or any other required permit,
whichever occurs first. The Conditional Uae may be
renewed following the same procedure ae outlined in
Section 2.7.4 of the Collier County Land Development
Code. The fee requirements shall be waived for t. his
re-application.
Stipulation "t." - The Petitioner shall limit ~.he
asphalt batch plant operations to daylight hours only,
unless otherwise approved by ~be County Manager or his
designee.
b. The Current Planning Manager, may approve minor changes
in the loc:arian, siting, or height of buildings,
structure~ and improvements authorized by
conditional use. E~pansion of the uses identified and
approved within this conditional use application~ or
major changes to the site plan submitted aa par~ of this
applicationw shall require ~he submittal of · new
conditional use application, and shall comply wi~h all
applicable County ordinances in effect at
submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan
Review and Approval, of the Collier County Land
Development Code, Ordinance
c. Ail above ground tanks exceeding a volume of 250 gallons
per tank shall be brought into compliance and registered
(if required) with the Collier County Pollution Control
Department and the Florida Department of Environmental
Re~ulation within six (6),months of approval of ~his
petition.
d. The containment area for ~he above 9Tound tanks shall be
upgraded to address conditions specified in Section
4.2.1 of the Groundwater Protection Ordinance COrdinance
No. 91-10~) within six (6) months of approval of ~hie
pe~i~ion.
e. Proof of all appropriate tank registrations (sub~ect to
Florida Administrative Code 17-762) and that the diesel
fuel storage tank has been brought into compliance with
regards to secondary containment (subject to Ordinance
~o. ~1~10~) shall be provided to the Collier County
Pollution Control ~epartment within ~0 days of approval
of this petition.
Road impact fees in the amount of $X?,094.07 shall be
assessed for this uae in accordance with Ordinance No.
92-22 and shall be paid ~i~hin thirty (~0) days of
approval of this petition. However, if the Petitioner
provides evidence of payment of prior road impact fees,
the newly computed road impact fees may be reduced by
the amount of any such prior payments.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in
the m±nutes of this Board.
Commissioner Volpe offered the foregoing
Resolution and moved for its adoption, seconded by Commissioner
}~hews and upon roll call, th, vo~a was:
AYES: Co~m{ss£oner Volpe. Co-~lsioner MaC,hews, Co=~/ssion~r Norris.
Commissioner Constantine snd Commissioner Saunders
NAYS:
ABSENT AND NOT VOTING:
ABSTENTION:
Dona this 30th day of March , 1993.
~OARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
"" "" ' '"' BY:
'~TTEST: /
' .LEGA.L SUFFICIENCY:
KARJO~E M. STUDENT
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
PU-87-22C (ADDITIONAL REVIEW)
nb/9958
fmcc,~ 2 - ~1/4 ot ~1/41 sM nl/4 of ~!/4, k~tfl 11, ~lp .
~iit, Co~Z~ec C~nt~,
firceZ 4 - S~/4 of ~1/4t end IV1/4 of ~1/41 I~ S11/4 of ~1/4,
lectLon II, T~lhJp SO ~uth, ~ge 2i lilt, ~IZIK '
County, r~ocLdl.
120~ iCrel
~lrceZ S - M1/2 o~ ~1/4, h~tLofl gist, Co~ec County,
FEB!01998 .
FEB 1 0 199B
RESOLUTION 9 3-_,.~
RELATING TO PETITION NO. PU-87-22C FOR EXTENSION
OF CONDITIONAL USE OF PROPERTY HEREINAFTER
DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COU~Y, FLORIDA
WHERe. AS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter
125, Florida Statutes, hal conferred on all Counties in Florida the
power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business
regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public~ and
W~ERF. AS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land
Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes
comprehensive zoning regulations for the zoning of particular
divisions of the County, among which is the granting and ax~snding
the time period of Conditional Uses formerly kno~l as Provisional
Uses; and
WHEREAS, on January 26, 1988, the Board of Zoning Appeals
enacted Resolution No. 88-31, which granted a provisional use now
known as a conditional usa pursuant to Ordinance No. 82-2, for a
portable asphaltic concrete batch plant, on the below described
property; and
W~EREAS, on January 10, 1989, the Board of Zoning Apl~ale
enacted Resolution No. 89-7, which granted a provisional use
e×tension now known as conditional use extension pursuant to
Ordinance No. 82-2 for the afor.'mentioned provisional use~ and
W~EREAS, Stipulation #q.. of Resolution No. 88-31 provided
that the provisional use granted shall expire five (5) years after
the effective date of approval of the provisional use~ and that the
provisional u=~ may be renewed following the same procedure as
outlined in S~ction 13.1. of the Zoning Ordimance 82-2~ and,
furthermore, =hat the fee requirements will be waived for this
re-application; and
W~£REAS, Joseph D. Bonness, Jr., of Highway Pavers, Inc.,
representing the Willow Run Land Trust as Trustee, petitioned the
board of Zo~g Appea~s to extend thi~ provisio ~ ,,~g~y~ --
NOW, TMEREFORE B~ IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Zoning Appe&le
of Collier County, Florida that:
The written request of Joseph D. Bonness, Jr., of Highway
Pavers, Inc., representing the Willow RKn Land Trust as ~'rustee, in
interest of the following described property:
ZXhibit NAN
is hereby approved pursuant to action of the Board of Zoning
Appeals and the expiration date for Resolution No. 89-7, attached
hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B' and all conditions
applicable thereto, is ex~ended hereby for ninety (90) daye until
April 5, 1993.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the
minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition for which
the extension is granted.
Commissioner Volpe offered the foregoing
Resolution and moved for its adoption, seconded by Commissioner
/fa n~hews . , and upon roll call, the vote was:
AYES: Co~tssioner Volpe, Comm4sstoner }~=Khews, Con~ssioner Constantine
Comm{s$ioner Saunders
NAYS: Co~missioner :~orris
ABSENT AND NOT VOTING:
ABSTENTION:
Done this 5th day of January , 1993.
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, ,F~LORIDA
BURT L. SAUNDERS, CMAIRMAR
ATTEST: · .~.
DWIGHT E. BROC~ CLERK
APPROVED AS TO..'FCRM ARD LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
STUD
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
PU-87-22C EXTENSION RESOLUTION
nb/9962
'
' [ ~ ~l~ . ....'....
%q%lovst
_ ..o ..:.._ , ,.13 l,?Stfeotr,tkMee
iflg.M l?.. 4~' 14'.B, 12~.00 feetj.Che~e'l 2~lt~ 4i" l, 3~.~
~heflc, S e~ .~o* ~4-.~, A2~.oo (ee~l thence I 3" Zl' 46e.l, ~,~ *
FEB 1 0 15:~8
C~r~enaive zon~g ordt~
c~ s
Sea i~
$0 ~o=~y appr~id puzm~ to Io~, X3.2(e], ~ Mo.
82-~, ~ ~a a~lr&~,ion da~e for ~e ~bi~ ue OeO eg
~e A-2 D~m~/ct tA tteFeby
~?-~. /
FEB 1 0 199~
~.~ :. i ~, .... . ~.
?:~ ~~.;~.: ~,._~ . ,....
· -.' :~ ~~1~. '... ..~-~
'.'-¥.' . . ~.~. . . .. ':. ,
.' ' ~t~E'.. :"..~~ ~.Z~ - · . .. ..:~;
.... ::::.:~~:?::l '..'~, ,,~,....~':'-... :. ...... . .' .~ ,..:~..
,..~,~f. · , .. ,...~.:~,.......
· .:. ~
· ' '~ , Z~l~evl~ .
-.t -- - g- o' · e~e I 2.L9' 4 · '
'. ..:~.
... th ~2 tm fez th ~z~ bz,~v ~. i b h m i
fattest
FEB 1 0 1998
FEB 1 0 1998
The ~&f,T.. 2./4 of Lb4* S,oqJ~*Je~dc ~"4 ~ tho ~ 3,/'4 ef Ute ImfJUdd~ 3./4
4estate4 e~timt ~ uHma tb f~ ~ bte~ th
~7 fO~ d~ltSt
A valid ~ut7 ~ u~a~ ~t.
~ ~tT, State o~ reder~ ot~w~ ef
yhat ~ ~ (JO) feet fer M~ mtmrise m~.
e. ~t/~o ~y ~ p~ed ~ ~ btm e(
(S) 7eor. after the effeett~e dorm ef a~t~eZ ef
MO.
FEB 1 0 199B
m
FEB 1 0 19118
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PELATING TO PETITION NO. CU-96-1, FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF A CONDITIONAL
USE FOR A CHINCH IN THE RSF-3 ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPF_~TY DESCRIBED IN
RESOLUTION 96-192 ADOPTED ON APRIL 9, 1996 PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.7.4
(CONDITIONAL USE PROCEDURES) OF THE LDC.
OBJECTIVE:
This petition seeks to extend the date by which a conditional use was first approved for a church in an
RSF-3 zoning district located as illustrated in the aforementioned Resolution. This is the second
extension request. The Collier County Land Development Code provides for a maximum of three (3)
one year extensions to conditional uses.
CONSIDERATIONS:
'/'he approved development order Resolution 96-192 remains consistent with all elements of the GMP
and in particular the Future Land Use Element which provides for churches as conditional uses in all
residential zoning distr/cts. Correspondence fi.om the owners agent advises that members of the church
are actively pursuing the steps essential to initiating construction of the church.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT:
None.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
That a second extension be gr=ted to Petition No. CU-96-1 in accordance with the attached Resolution
and Exhibits thereto.
CHIEF PLANNER
REVIEWED BY:
I~OBiRT J. MULHER~, AICP DATE
CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER
DONALD W. ARNOLD, AICP DATE
PL..A~NG SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
VINCENT A. CAUTERO, ADMINISTRATOR DATE
COMMUNITY DEV. AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS.
CU-96-1 EXTENSION EX SUMMARY/md
FEB ! 0 1998
2 _ I~.,,~
": K'., ~/,',K~. LA',,I'~ -".FI .'~RC}tITECT<. CC'N.CTRL'CTIC~N
January 14, 1995
'~;- : . ....
Mr. Ronald F. Nino, AICP
CN~Planner ,. , 2 ~,
Collier County
Community Development & Environmental '\"~'~ .'~,.~ CE,q~ICES
Services Division
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Florida 34104
Subject: Petition No. CU-96-1 0Extension), Naples New Haitian ~ of the ~
Dear Mr. Nino:
Thank you for the letter reminding us that the conditional use for the mbjec~ [xoperW is ~ its
expiration date. We do wish to request an ex'tension of the conditional use. ~ church members
are continuing with the process of preparing architectural drawings for ibc new ~
actively fund raising in order to proceed with the construction ofthe church building.
A check for the $175.00 processing fee is enclosed. Please let me know when this item is
scheduled to be heard by the commissioners and if you foresee any issues which might negatively
impact its prospects for approval.
Sincerely,
WILSON, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC.
Thomas R. Peek, P.E., P.S.M.
Chairman
cc: Rev. Jean Paul
Enclosure
F, .'/
\VlLSON, NIlLLER, BARTON ~l. P"EK. INC. FEB 1 0 1998
32~ Bailey Lane, State 2~, Naples, Flonda 34105.8507 * Ph 941-~9-4~0 Fx 941-~3. 716
~"eb Site: ~'.~ il~mtller, com E-mai~: n~l~w~m,l~r.c~
RESOLUTION 98-
RELATING TO PETITION NO. CU-96-1 FOR
EXTENSION OF CONDITIOHAL USE OF PROPERTY
HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORI~A
WHerEAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125,
Florida Statutes, has conferred on all Counties in Florida the Ix~wer to
establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such businees regulations as
are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development
Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes comprehensive zoning
regulations for the zoning of particular divisions of the County, among
which is the granting and extending the time period of Conditional Uses;
and
WHEREAS, on April 9, 1996, the Board of Zoning Appeals enacted
Resolution No. 96-192, attached hereto and incorporated herein, which
granted a conditional use pursuant to Ordinance No. 91-102, for a church,
on the below described property; and
WHEREAS, on March 25, 1997, the Board of Zoning Appeals enacted
Resolution No. 97-190, attached hereto and incorporated herein, which
granted a one (1) year extension to the Provisional Use granted in
Resolution No. 97-190;
WHEREAS, Subsection 2.7.4.5 of the Land Develol~nent Code provid,ts
that the Board of Zoning Appeals may extend the one (1) year time period
for a conditional use which has not been convinced;
NOW, T"HEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Zoning Appeals of
Collier County, Florida that:
The written request of Tom Peek Of Wilson, Miller, Barton and Peek,
Inc., representing Naples New Haitian Church of the Nazaarene for the
second of three (3) permitted one (1) year extensions, in in:crest of the
following described property:
Lot 99. Naples Grove & Truck Co., Little Farm ~2, as recorded
in Plat Book 1, Page 27, of the Public Records of Collier
County, Florida.
FEB ! 0 1998
4- ,,
is hereby approved pursuant to Subsection 2.7.4.5 of the Land Development
Code (Ordinance No. 91-102), and the expiration date for Resolution No.
96-192, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 'A', and all
conditions applicable thereto, is hereby extended for on. additional year
until April 9, 1999.
BE IT FURTHER RRSOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the
minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition for which the
extension is granted.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
Done this day of , 1998.
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
BARRARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
~sS~STX~V county
f/C~J- ~ -1
FEB 1 0 1998
-2-
RESOLUTION 97- 1____~90
RELATING TO PETITION NO. CU-96-1 FOR
EXTENSION OF CONDITIONA~ USE OF PROPERTY
HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
WHERe, the Legislature of the State of £1orida in Chapter 125,
Florida Statutes, has conferred on all Counties in Florida the ~ower
establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business re~ulations
as are necessary for the Protection of the public~ and
WHERF. A~, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land
Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which establishes comprehensiv!
zoning regulations for the zoning of Particular divisions of the
County, among which is the granting and extending the time period of
Condi~ional Uses~ and
WHERFJtS, on ~ril 9, 1996, the Board of Zoning ;~Dpeals enacted
Resolution No. 96-192, att&chad hereto and incorporated herein, which
granted a conditional use pursuant to Ordinance No..91-102, &s amended,
for a church, on the below described proper=y~ and
WHEREAS, Subsection 2.7.4.5 of the Land Develolamen= Code ])rovides
that the Board of Zoning A~peals may extend the one (1) year t~me
period for a conditional use which has not been commencedl
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOL~]~D, by the Board of Zoning Appeals of
Collier County, Florida ~hat:
The written request of Barbara Cawley of WilSon, Miller, Barton
and Peek, Inc., representing Naples New ~al~lan Church of the Nazsarene
for the first of three (3) permitted one (1) year extensions, in
interest of th~ following described property:
Lot 99, Naples Grove & Truck Co., Little Farln 92, as recorded
in Pla~ Book 1, Page 27, of the Public Records of Collier
County, Florida.
is hereby approved pursuant to Subsection 2.7.4.5 of the Land
Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102), and the expiration date for
Resolution No. 96-192, attached hereto and incorporated herein aa
: FEB 1 0 1998
-1- &
Exhibit "A", and all condi=lons applicable thereto, ks hereby ext,nded
for one addi=lonal year un=l! ~Dr~l 9, 1998.
BE IT FURTHER R~SOLV~D that =his Resolu=~on be recordld ~n =hi
minu=es of =his Board and in =he records of the Petition for wh~ch the
extension is granted.
This Resolution adopted al=er mo=~on, second and majority vote.
BO~ OF ZONING APPF~
COLLIER C(~JNTY, FLORIDA
.... BY:
ATT~$'T: "%.
DWIGHT E..BR~K/.CLERK
~JOR~ M. STUDENT '
~SIST~T CO~TY ATTORnEy
f/~-96-1
F'EB 1 0 1998
?
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF A ~HURCH, CONDITIONAL USE 2, IN THE "RSF-3"
ZONING DISTRICT ~URSUANT TO SECTION 2.2.4.3 OF
THE COLLIER COUNTY LARD DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50
SOUTH,, RARGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
W~£REAS, the Legislature of the State o! Florid& An Chapter
67-1246, Laws of Florida, end Chapter 125, Florida St&ruSes, h&e
conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and
enforce zoning and' such business regulations &s ere necessary for the
p~otection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto h&e adopted a Land
Development Code (Ordinance No. 91-102) which include· · Comprehenat
zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning o~ partlcul~
geographic divisions of the County, among which il the granting of
Conditional Uses; end
WHEREAS, the Collier county Planning Commission, being the dul~
appointed and cons~ituted planning board for the aras hereby affa~e
has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulation· a
provided, and has considered the advisability of Conditional
£ection'2 2.4 3. in an "RSF-3" zone for a church on ~.he property
· .
hereinafter described, and has found as a ma~ter of fac~ (Exhibl~ ~;
that satisfacto~ provision and arrangement have been made co.ce~lr
all applicable ma~er~ required by said ragula~ion~ and in accordan~
with Subsec~ion 2.7.4.4 of the Lend Devalopman~ Code for the Collie:
County Planning Commission; and
WMEREA$, all interested parties have been given opportunity to
heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled end the I.o&rd hay
considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOA~ OF IONXNG A~PEAX~ ·
Collier County, Florida ~hat:
~e petition filed by Barbara H. Cawley, ll~, of Wtlio., Hill
~arton & Peek, Inc., repraIen~lmg
Nazarene wl~h raspec= to the proper~y hereinaf~er ~ascribe~
Lot $9, Naples Grove & Truck Co., Little Farm ~2, ·s rscor~·d
in Plat Book l,,Page 27, of ths Public Records of Collier
County, Florida.
be and tbs sams ia hereby approved for Conditional Us· 2 of S·ction'
2.2.4.$ Of the "RSF-3" zoning district for s church in ·ccordance wit:
--..:~ the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "B") and subject to th· following
'-=" conditions:
· ._~ 1. Arterial l&vel street lighting shall be provided at both
access points prior to the tssuancs of ·ny
__ of Occupancy.
~a~ 2: The church shall be responsible for both northbound
southbound turn lines from Bsyshors Drive into the
'~.--~ propmrty'~hmn r~qumsted by Collier County~
~ northbound right ~urn lent may, however, bm
-- i ~h~ ne~d for ~h~ ~urn lan~ is present.
:~ 3. The southbound left turn lane should be · requirement of
~ the buildout development. If further traffic ·n·lysis ·
_.. indicates the need for the left turn lane before
..-.~ second phase of development, the second phial should bo
dependent upon the turn lane being in place prior t.o the
---:..; issuance of building permits for the second phase. Xf
.~. the turn lane is not requited until bulldout, it shall
be required to be In place prior to the issuance o~ any
~ cetti~icata o~ Occupancy for the second phase.
-~ ~. The applicant shall confirm a positive d~ainage
and the adequacy thareof~ for purposes of p~oJec~
~ buildout. Should the drainage outfall re~l~e capacity
~ improvements, the benefitin9 parties shall in~r a fair
share cost o~ such improvements.
S. Environmental pe~itting shall be in accordance with
--~ State o~ Florida Environmental Resource Pe~l~ rules and
--. be subject to review and approval by ~rrent Pla~ln~
Environmental Review S~aff. Removal of exotics shall
~m no= be required east of Coma=l~u=iom Drive
-- required in the wetlands tn accordance wi~
- pe~i~.
6. Environmental permi~inq shall be in accordance ~l~h
~ S~a~e o~ Florida Environmental Resource PeFnl~ Rules and
be su~Jec~ ~o review and approval bM Curren~ Planning
--~ Environmen~al Review S~a~f. Removal o~ exotic
~ ve~e~a~ion shall be in accordance ~i~h ~ha Collier
~ ~ County Land Davelopmen~ Code.
7. Prior to Final Sits Development Plan approval
~ Petitioner shall submit a management plan p~auan~ ~o
'-~" Collier County Land Development Code, Section 3.9.5.3.
--- s. All conservation areas shall be recorded on the plat
with protective covenants per or similar to Section
~'~ 704.06 of the Florida Statues. Conservation areas shall
.~_ be dedicated on the plat to the pro~ect's owner
entity for ownership and maintenance responsibilities
--. and to Collier County with no responsibility for
maintenance,
'"; 9. Buffer zones will be placed around wetlahds'in
'~" accordance with South Florida Water Management
" 10. Prior to fin&l Site Development Plln approval the
· '"'~ petitionsr~shall supply a letter from U.S. Flih and
~ Wildlife $~rvicss (USFW$), lndicatinq that the bald
. ~ eagle nsst vhich vas locatld to the vest of the property
· --=, is no longer being used.
:'... Il. The petitioner shall supply an appropriate wildlife
~ habitat management plan as required by f. ha U.S. Fish
Wildlife Service (UdFWS) and Florida 6ams and Frllh
~ Water Fish, Commission (FGFWF¢) in relation to the bald
eagle nest located to the west of the property, prior to
~ an approval of any final development order.
· '~' 12 An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and
~ maintenance (exotic-free) plan for the site, ~lth
emphasis on the conservation/preservation areas, shall
~ be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Review
~,~ Staff for review and approval prior to final site
plan/co~truction plan approval. The exotic re,oval
--~ plan may bs phased as approved by Current Planning
' , Environmental Staff.
13. sit& lighting shall be directed to surface areas to be
~..h'~. ' illuminated in such a manner as not to cause a ql~tra to
~ adjacent property owners. ·
~ 14. Security lighting shall be provided on all parking areas
· ':"-' and lmmedia~e environs of the building.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in
minutes of this Board.
r=~ Commissioner Mac'Kie offered the foregoing
Resolution and moved for its adoption, seconded by Commissioner
Conm=an~ime and upon roll call, the vote wast
~ AYES: Commfasion,r Mac'Kit,. Commiaalonec Co~etan~ine~ Co~ls~lo~er
'?.~ Comm£ssionl: Ma~hewa and Commission&~ No~ls
· .~ NAYS~
:.-. ABSENT AND NOT VOTINg:
ABST~TION:
Dona this 9~h day of ....~pril , 1996.
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
A~.~OV£~ AS T~ ~C~m~
3'.':: ~O~E M. STUD~T
CU-96-1. R ESOLUTION/l$412
FINDING OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
PETITION NO. CU-96-1
·
The following facts are found:
1. Section 2.2.4.3.2 of the Land Devlopmant Code authorized
the conditional use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect
the public interest and will not adversely affect other
property or uses in the same district or neighborhood
because ~f:
A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and
Growth Management
Yes No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed
structures thereon with particular reference to
automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,
traffic flow and control, and acces~ in case of
fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress & egress
Yes ~___
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to
nois~ glare, economic or odor effects:
v~ No affect or Affect mitigated by
Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other
property in the district:
Compatible use within 9is 'rict ..
Yes . / No
Based on the above findings, this communal use should,
with stipulations, (copy attached) ~_houl_~not) be
recommended fdr approval
FINDING OF FACT CHAIRMAN/
-- EXHIBIT
FEB 1 0 1998
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE EXCAVATION PERMIT NO. 59.632
"CREATIVE HOMES COMMERCIAL EXCAVATION LOCATED IN SECTION
11, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, UNIT 59 OF GOLDEN GATE
ESTATES BOUNDED B~ THE EAST ~ND WEST BY VACANT LOTS ZONES
"ESTATES," ON THE NORTH BY 14'" STREET N.E., AND ON THE SOUTH
BY A COLLIER COUNTY CANAL AND EASEMENT.
OBJECTIVE:
To issue an excavation permit to Creative Homes of S.W. Florida for the project known
as "Creative Homes Commercial Excavation" in accordance with the County Ordinance
No. 92-73, Division 3.5.
CONSIDERATIONS:
The Petitioner proposes to excavate a 1.8 acre lake on 5 acres in Golden Gate Estates. An
estimated 25,500 C.Y. of material will be removed and hauled offsite. The excavation
will be conterminous with thc existing canal. The County's water management
department has no objections as long as maintenance easements are created.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Community Development Fund (113) would receive the following Fee Income:
Application Fcc $850.00
Permit Fee 134.00
Road Impact Fee District 6 (338) Golden Gate Estates would receive the following Fee
Incon'te:
Road Impact Fee 105 I. 18
(A Performance Bond in the amount of $25,000 will also be required.)
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the issuance of Excavation Permit No.
59.632 to Creative Homes of S.W. Florida for the project known as "Creative Homes
Commercial Excavation" with the following stipulations:
I. The excavation shall be limited to a bottom elevation of 16 feet below existing
grade and shall be no shallower than 10 feet below existing grade.
2. Petitioner must create a 20' Easement around the lake bank so that Collier
County can continue to maintain the existing canal bank upstream and
downstream of the project.
3. Offsite removal of material shall be subject to standard conditions imposed by
the Transportation Department (attached).
AGENDA ITEM
FEB 1 O 1998
4. No blasting will be permitted unless issued ~ separate permit by Colli~ Counl)' En~nE
Review Services.
If vegetation is to be removed as a result of the exc~wtion, ~ set~ Vegetation P.~moval
Permit (pet Collier County La~d Development Code,, Division 9) shall I~ obtained from
Collier County Development Scrvic~s D~arlm~t bcfor~ commenciag work.
PREP/kl~D BY "
' ' ...:.,
STAN CHRZANOWSKI. P.E. DATE
SENIOR ENGINEER
REVIEWED BY:
THO~iA~ E-~ KUCK
EN~I~E~ ~VIEW ~
DON~D W. ~OLD, MCP DA
~NCE~ A. CAUTERO~ ~fl~ST~TOR
COMMUNI~ DEV. ~D E~RON~~
$C F.X SUMMARY/d~n
FEB 1 0 B98
2
~omsinai, N ~.
0 ~ 12~ S~IET NJ.
I r ~B 1 1998
COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTA~ON SERVICES
"STANDARD CONDITIONS"
EXCAVATION PERMIT APPLICATIONS INVOLVING
OFF-SITE REMOVAL OF MATERIAL
The intent of these "Standard Conditions" are to provide excavation permit applicants a ~ of
conditions which may affect their projects and which should be taken into consideration during all
stages of project development:
1. Haul routes between an ~cavation site and an arterial mad shall b~ priv~ with ~
owner(s) approval or be a public collector road built to standards applicable to handle the
r~sulting u'uck traffic. Wher~ residential areas front collector roads, appropriate turn lanes,
buffer and bikepath shall be required as minimal site improvements and ifrecommez~led for
approval, shall be so with the condition that the Transpon~on Services Administration
r~rvcs thc right to suspend or prohibit off-site removal of excavated material should such
r~moval create a lmzardous road condition or substantially deteriorate a road condition; such
a:tion by the Transportation Sec'vices Administration shall be subject to appeal be:tore the
Board of County Commissioners.
2. Haul routes utilizing public roads shall be subject to road maintenance and road repair
appropriate fair share by the permittee in accordance with Excavation Ordinance No. 91-
as amended Div. 3.5 and Right-of-Way Ordinance No. 93-64.
3. Off-site r~noval of excavated material shall be subject to Ordinance No. 92-22 (Road
Impact Ordinance). A trafEc and road impact analysis shall be made by the County to
determine the effects that off-site removal of excavated material will have on the road
system within thc excavation project's zone of influence. If appropriate, road impact fees in
accordance with Ordinance No. 92-22 shall be paid prior to the issuance of an excavation
permit.
4. The Traz~'portation Services Administration reserves the right to establish emergency weight
limits on public roadways affected by the off-site removal of excavated material; the
procedure for establishmem of weight li~ts shall be the presentation of an applicable
re.solution before the Board of County Commissioners. Should weight limits be inititutect,
the permit'tee shall be responsible to implement measures to assure thnt all heavy truck
loadings leaving the permit's property conform to the applicable weight restriction.
5. The Excavation Performance Guarantee shall apply to excavation operations and also the
maintenance/repair of public roads in accordance with current ordinances and applicable
permit stipulations.
Based on soil boring information per Ordinance No. 91-102 as ~unended, s blssting permit
ms_y be appropriate. Should a blasting permit application be submi~ md should
residential areas exist within one mile of the excavation site, the County reseiw~ th~ right to
deny a blasting permit based on concer~ for off-site impscts from blasting st ~n excsvstion
site. Should a blasting p~mit be considered and approved, the minimum conditiom of
approval in addition to conditions per Ordinance No. 91-102 as amended ar~ as follows:
A. Structure inventory/monitoring and applicable pmper~ owner release a~ tequfl'ed by
the Development Services Director.
B. Security bond ~pplicable to private pmpeay d~nage acceptable to the County.
C. Control of size'depth/number of ctzarges per blast by the Development Servic~
Director.
D. The fight of the County to suspend and/or revoke blaring permit authority should it
be detcrm~ed that blasting activitie~ are creating unacceptable off-aite conditio~
either in terms of private property damage md/or related physical effects of blasting
operations.
O 7. No excavation permit shall be issued until receipt of a release fi'om the T~on
Services Admh~stration applicable to proper mitigation of off-site impacts, meeting of
applicable provisions of Ordinance No. 93-64, Ordinance No. 92-22, and ~ No.
91-102 as eanended.
Reference to letter of 5/24/88
Revised 1/13/98
Page Two of Two FEB 1 0 ~9~8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ACCEPT A QUITCLAIM DEED FOR SHELLABARGER PARK IN
REFERENCE TO A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS.
~ To have the Board of County Commissioners accept the quitclaim deed
granted by Robert and Ervene Shellabarger in reference to Community Development
Block Grant for infrastructure improvements to Shellabarger Park in Immokalee (Grant #
97-DB-3 K-09-21-01 -N03).
C_ONSIDE1LS~__T!ON; In December, 1995, the Board of County Commissioners approved
Resolution 95-692, to authorize the submission of an application to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for a Small Cities Community Development
Block Grant under the Neighborhood Revitalization category. Since that time negotiations
have taken place between staff, DCA, and Robert and Ervene Shellabarger to facilitate this
conveyance. This project will improve the sanitation of the Shellabarger Park by removing
the use of septic tanks and replacing them with a more modem disposal system; the
project will improve drainage conditions, which presently threaten the health and safety of
the residents of Shellabarger Park, by installing an adequate roadway with improved
drainage system. This aforementioned conveyance has been reviewed by county staff for
legal sufficiency.
_FISCAL IMPA~-~: Filing fees of $21.00 for quitclaim deeds are provided by the 97/98
operating budget. Revenue is provided by the Community Development Block Grant.
Costs will be assigned to Fund 121-138755-631550-33021.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPA~T: The subject property is located in the
Imrnokalee area where an expansion oft:rban services a~e permitted, pursuant to Objective
Ili.2 of the Immokalee Area Master Plan. This conveyance is consistent with the Collier
County Growth Management Plan.
P~ECOMMENDATIQ.~: That the Board of County Commissioners accept the
Conveyance from Robert and Ervene Shellabarger and direct county staff to record all
necessary documents in the public records of Collier County.
FEB 1 0 1998
Executive Summary
Acceptance of Quit Claim need
Paga 2
SUBMITTED BY:~fa~o~. we,,at, JManager DATE: ./.?~
H~busing & Urban Improvement
Hou~iR0& Urban Improvement
V~ncen~ A. Cautero, Administrator
Community Development 8, Environmental Services
Project: Shellabarger MHP
Prepared W~hout Examination of Title
By: Lois Nichols. Real Property Specialist
Real Property Management Department
3301 Tamiami Trail Easl
Naples, FL 34112
QUITCLAIM DEED
THIS QUITCLAIM DEED executed this \ [z~ day of ~, 19.--CL~ by ROBERT
SHELLABARGER and ERVENE L SHELLABARGER, Husband and Wlfe. (hereinafter called
the Grantor) to COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision o~ the State of Florida, its sucoesm~'s,
and aasigns, whose pos~-of~e address is 3301 Tamtaml Trail East, Naples, Flodda ~4112
(hereinafter called the Grantee).
(Wherever used herein the terms 'Grantor' and 'Grantee" include ell the parties to this
instrument and the heirs, legal representativeS, successors, and assigns.}
WITNESSETH: That the Grantor. f~r and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars
($10.00) in hand paid by the Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby
remise, release, and quitclaim unto the Grantee forever, all the right, title, Interest. claim, and
demand which the Grantor has in and to the following described lot, piece of parcel of land situate.
lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to wit:
See Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and made a pad hereof
SuL, iect to easement, re~dctions, and reservations of record.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances
thereunto belonging to or in anywise appedeining, and ell the estate, right, title, Interest. lien.
equity, and da~m whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equi~, to the only proper use. benefit
and behoof of the Grantee forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the day
and year hrsl above written.
WITNESSES.
WitnesS(Signature) ~ . ,
Robed She!labarger
~,~ (Print)
Witness (S~natum} .~- ~ 2~02 Immok~lee Drive
Name: (,_--~,(~( (,. |~,~('~".~ . Immoka~ee. FL 34142
(Pdnt)
Name: C'.I'!:?JE:,_~_~_ ('~:,'rt?ell .
. ~ ( ,.~ ,.~ . ~ .... 2902 Immokalee Drive
Neme'_ %,"~'(,i~(C_. tC~,,~('-tC'C~ Immokalee, FL 34142
(p,int) I~~
^ckno~edgment Page Follows
FEB ! 0 1998
Quil¢la~m Deed
Page 2
STATE OF F~C,~ ~'~,
COUNt' OF (" rM\~'~ 'C
The foregoing Quttdaim Deed was acknowledged before me this ! .[~', day of
1997, by Robert Shellabarger, who is per~onally_know~ to me o~ who has pmd~
&$ ident~calion.
( Notarial Seal ) NoLary 15ub~ ~
¢'r~nt Name) L~.~'(~ ~'. '['~.~C(C.-%
COUNTY OF C ~I'~'P
1997. by Ervene L. Shellabarger, wllo iR personally knov~_ tO me or who has produced as identification. '
( Notarial Seal ) Nc~ry Public/,3 .... .-.1- ....
(Print Name) ~ _"~\(.~.~'_
li~..._~'~,' c,.~,~,,,,,,. ~ ~ My Commission Expires: -';3.-
OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
,3.301 EAST TANtlAMI TRAIL NAPLCS, FLORIDA 34112
(941) 7'/4-U192
PI(0Ji'CT NO..
PI{OJECr PN~CEL NO.
3AX PNiCEL NO.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEVL)
~C]'NG AT T1~ SO--ST COR~:R OF S£CTJON
ILKNG~ 29 EAST. CO~ COUNTY, FLOR~A; TI~NC~ NORTH
~~ OF ~0~ D~, A DI~A~
O DEG~ 53 N~S ~ SE~S ~T, A DI~ANCE OF 30.~
~OR~ ~g~ OF WAY L~ OF ~~E g~
"' ~NC~ CO%~G NOR~ ALONG SA~ ~ A DI~
~%~S 45 SECO~S ~ST, A DISTANCE OF 5~?5 ~; ~ ~0 '.
D[C~ES 49 ~S 10 SECTS ~, A D[STAN~ OF60.~
~ ~ DEGAS IT k~r~S 45 ~S ~ST,
~; ~ENCE SO~ 0 DEGAS 53 k~ ~ 5ECO~S EAST, A DI~ OF "
220 ~ ~T TO ~ NOR~ ~ ~ WAY L~ ~ AFO~S~ ~O~t~
D~VE'. T~C~ SOL~ 89 DEG~ES ~1 MI~ 4S ~CO~S ~T ~NG S~D
~OR~ ~g~ OF WAY L~ A DI~ANCE OF ~.~
DiS r~CE OF 220 ~ ~; ~ ~R~ 0 DEG~ES
SECONDS ~ST, A DI~A~CE OF 610.~ ~; ~ N~ 0
M~'~S ~ SE~S ~, A Df~AN~ ~ 2~.~
DEGASS; 7 ~%~S aS ~S ~T, A DISTANCE
~b~ 0 DEGAS 5~ ~ ~ SE~S EAST, A DIST~ ~ li~.~
~T TO T~ AF~ESA~ ~ ~G~ OF WAY L~E OF
~NCE SC)L~ 19 DE~$ ~1 ~S 4S SE~S ~, A DI~
3.~ AC~S 1243.76] ~UARE ~'~. ~ OR ~.
B~[S OF BEINGS IS ~ ~INE ~ ~OKA~ D~
~ ~9 DEGAS 17 ~S IS SE~S
OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS
3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
(941) 774-8192
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
/
I
.MMOKAL[[ DRI~ (60'
GENERAL NOTES
]) P.O.C. Indicates Point o¢ Com,,~enceMent
8) P.O.B, ind;c~tes Po;hr or
3) Sec. Ind;c~¢es Section
4~ Twp. [nd;cotes
5) Rge. Ind;c~tes RonOe
G) R/~ ind;c~tes RiQht-~-~oy
7) All ~iSt~nCeS Ore in ~t ~nd dec~m~ts ~hereo¢
]mnoPote¢ Drive being N. og'~T'45'E.
THIS IS ONLY A SK~C"
'" ~ ~ SHE~ 2 DF 2
J SCALE 06-20-97 SHELLiOi
RECORDING FORM '
AGENDA DATE:
AGENDA ITEM: ACCEPT QUITCLAIM DEED FOR SHELLABAARGER PARK IN
IMMOKALEE FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS. THIS 18 A COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (97.DB-3k-09-21-01-N03).
COLLIER COUNTY AS GRANTEE:
PLEASE CALL LOIS NICHOLS AT EXTENSION -8991 FOR DOCUMENTPICK-UP.
COMMENTS:
DO NOT RECORD THIS DOCUMENT
RETURN TO REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
REQUEST TO APPROVE FOR RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT OF "ISLAND WALK PHASE
ONE"
To approve for recording the final plat of "Island Walk Phase One", a
subdivision of lands located in Section 33, Township 48 South, Range
26 East, Collier County, Florida.
gONSIDERAT~Q~,
Engineering Review Section has completed the review of the
construction drawings, specifications, and final plat of "Island Walk
Phase One". These documents are in compliance with the County Land
Development Code and Florida State Statute No. 177. All fees have
been paid. It is the intent of the developer to record the plat
prior to construction of the improvements. The security in the
amount of 110% of the total cost of the required improvements is
being covered by construction and maintenance agreement and an
OIrrevocable Letter of Credit. This would be in conformance with the
County Land Development Code - Division 3.2.9.
Engineering Review Section recommends that the final plat of "Island
Walk Phase One" be approved for recording.
FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact to the County is as follows.
The project cost is $1,929,684.50 (estimated) to
be borne by the developer.
The cost breakdown is as follows:
a) Water & Sewer - $949,708.50
b) Drainage, St. Lts.,
Paving, Grading,
Landscaping & Irriga - $979,976.00
tion
The Security amount, equal to 110% of the
project cost, is $2,122,652.95
The County will realize revenues as follows:
Fund: Community Development Fund 113
Agency: County Manager
Cost Center: 138900 - Development Services
Revenue generated by this project:
Total: $35,910.89
Fees are based on a construction estimate of
$1,929,684.50 and were paid in Decemb~, F~,9~0 ~0~ I
and January, 1998.
L__P..-__1
Executive Summary
Island Walk Phase One
Page 2 The breakdown is as follows:
a) Plat Review Fee ($425.00 + $4./ - $ 920.68
b) Construction Drawing Review Fee Water &
Sewer (.50% const, est.) ' $ 4748.54
Water Re-use (irrigation) ' $ 276.49
Drainage,
Paving, Grading (.425% const. - $ 3929.89
c) Construction inspection Fee
Water &
Sewer (1.5% const, est.) - $14245.63
Drainage, - $11789.66
Paving, Grading (1.275% con~t, est.)
aROWTHMANAGEMENT IMPACT~
The Concurrency Waiver and Release relating to conditional
approval has been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's
Office for the project.
RECOM~DATIQ~
That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Final Plat of
.Island Walk Phase One" with the following stipulations:
1. Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit as security to
guarantee completion of the subdivision improvements.
2. Authorize the recording of the Final Plat of .Island Walk
phase One "
3. Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached construction
and maintenance agreement.
4. That no Certificates of Occupancy be 9ranted until the
required improvements have received preliminary acceptance.
Executive Summary
Island Walk Phase One
Page 3
PREPARED BY:
, J~.~ tl~\~,_,.,,, ~%, '-~a'~
John R. Houldsworth, Senior Engineer Date
Engineering Review
REVIEWED BY:
Thomas E. Kuck, P.E. Date
Engineering Review Manager
Donald W. Arnold DaZe
~.g Services
V~ncent A. Cautero, Administrator Date
Community Development & Environmental Services
Community Dev. and Environmental Svcs. DIVISION
JRa/ew
FEB 1 0 1998
· ...v 17 16 15 14 13
,'-'."~ ~- PROJECT
~ 22
4 20 21
~ ~c., ~) LOCATION
25
-. -. (C.R e62) .
~ T48S
w~ ~ 4 3 2 1
_~ .. SCALE
~ 9 10 ..,
12 ~. ~_ '
~ 13 18 17 16 15. 14 13
----'.. LOCATIONMAP ~,._~~.. )
:..'-.' ..... -=~'- FEB 1 0 lg98
~.. _' ... ~ ..= _ Pg:~..--..--___
CONSTRUCTION AND MAhNTENANCE AGREEMENT
OF SUBDIVISION D, IPROVEMENTS
THIS CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR
SUBDMSION IMPROVEMENTS entered into this _ .. day of ~ 1998
between Island Walk Development Company hereinafter referred to as "Developer" Nd the
Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as "The
Board".
1. Developer has, simultaneously with the delivery of this Agreement, applied for
the approval by the Board of a certain plat of a subdivision to be known as: Island Walk
Phase One.
2. Division 3.2 of the Collier Count>' Unified Land Development Code requires
the Developer to post appropriate guarantees for the construction of the improvements
required by said subdivision regulations, said guarantees to be incorporated in a bonded
agreement for the construction of the required improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and mutual
covenants hereinafter set forth, Developer and the Board do hereby covenant and agree as
follows:
1. Developer ~-il] cause to be constructed: a potable water system, sanitary sewer
systerm drainage, grading, paxing and ~fiscellaneous as outlined in Engineer's Cost Estimate
(attached hereto as E 'xhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof) within 12 months front
the date of approval of said subdixSsion plat, said improvements hereinafter referred to as the
required improvements.
2. Developer herewith tenders its subdivision performance security (attached
hereto as Exhibit "B" and by reference made a pan hereof) in the amount of $2,122,652.95
FEB 1 0 1998
Pg..._ ~ ,.
which amount represents 10% of the to'tal contract cost to complete constructi°n plus 100%
of the estimate cost to the the date of this
complete
required
improvements
at
Agreement.
3. In the event of default by the Developer or failure of the Developer to complete
such improvements within the time required by the Land Development Code, Collier County,
after written notice to Developer, may call upon the subdivision performance security to
insure satisfactory completion of the required improvements.
4. The required improvements shall not be considered complete until a statement
of substantial completion by Developer's engineer along with the final project records have
been furnished to be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Director for
compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code.
5. The Development Serv/ces Director shall, within sixty (60) days of receipt of
the statement of substantial completion, either: a) notify the Developer in writing of his
preliminary' approval of the improvements; or b) notify the Developer in writing of his
refusal to approve improvements, therewith specif3.Sng those conditions which the Developer
must fulfill in order to obtain the Director's approval of the improvements. However, in no
event shall the Development Sen'ices Director refuse preliminary approval of the
improvements if they are in fact constructed and submitted for approval in accordance with
the requirements of this Agreement.
6. The Developer shall maintain a/l required improvements for a minimum per/od
of one year after pre:mary approval by the Development Services Director. After the.one
year maintenance period by the Developer has terminated, the Developer shall petition the
Development Services Director to inspect the required improvements. The Development
Services Director or his designee shall inspect the improvements, and, if found to be still in
compliance w/th Collier Count3' Land Development Code as reflected by final approval by
the Board, the Board shall release the remaining 10% of the subdivision performance
security. The Developer's responsibility for maintenance of the required improvements shall
con.qnue unless or until the Board accepts maintenance responsibility for and by the County.
7. Six (6) months after the execution oft,his Agreement and once within every six
(6) months thereafter the Developer may request the Development Services Director to
reduce the dollar amount of the subdivision performance security on the basis of work
completed. Each request for a reduction in the dollar amount of the subdivision security
shall be accompanied by a statement of substantial c~mpletion by the Developer's engineer
together with the project records necessary for review by the Development Services Director.
The Development Services Director may grant the request for reduction in the amount oI' the
subdivision performance security for the improvements completed as of the date of the
request.
8. In the event the Developer shall fail or neglect to fulfill its obligations under
this Agreement, upon certification of such failure, the County Administrator may call upon
the subdivision performance securit3' to secure satisfactory completion, repair and
maintenance of the required improvements. The Board shall have .he fight to construct and
maintain, or cause to be constructed or maintained, pursuant to pubIic advertisement and
receipt and acceptance of bids, the improvements required herein. The Developer, as
principal under the subdMsion performance security, shall be liable to pa)' and to indenmif).'
the Board. upon completion of such construction, the final total cost to the Board thereof.
including, but not limited to, engineering, legal and contingent costs, together with an)'
damages, either direct or consequential, which the Board may sustain on account of the
failure of the Deve!oper to carry out all of the provisions of this Agreement.
9. All of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained are and shall be
binding upon the Developer respective successors and assigns of the Developer.
FEB 1 0 1998
._._~e.._ ~
[N V~HTNESS \~,q-IEKEOF, the Board and the Developer have caused this A~reement
O to be executed by their duly authorized representatives this day of ,1998.
Signed, Sealed and Delivered ISLAND WALK DEVELOPMENT
in the presence of: COMPANY
Michl~el D. R6sen,.,Vice-President
ATTEST:
D\~,qGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Barbara BenT, Chairman
Approved as to fon'n and legal sufficiency:
Collier Co~ty Attorney
han'ey\cou-mam.agr
FEB 1 0 1998
EXHIBIT "A"
ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
I. Sanitary Collection System $786,171.00
II. Reclaimed Water Distribution $55,297.00
Itl. Potable Water $163,537.50
IV. Drainage $265,455.00
V. Paving $506,685.00
VI. Ligh. ting $40,000.00
VII. M isce I la neous $112,539.00
TOTAL $1,929,684.50
10% OF TOTAL $192,968.45
@ 110% Letter of Credit Amount $2,122,652.95
S~mpte\Ex~\ConM.IW
O SUN UST
P030147
LETTER OF CREDIT___~__._E.R.:20, 1998
ISSUANCE DATE: JAgUAr,
APPLICANT:
ADVISING BANK: DIVOSTA AND Co~IN_C_:.-.~A~Dco
VILLAGE WALK DEVELO~mm~ ·
INC.
4500 PGA BLVD., NO. 400
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33418
BENEFICIARY:
THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMI SS I ONER~
COLLIER COUN FLORIDA
COLLIER COUNTY' CO~/RTHOUSE
COMPLEX
NAPLES, FLORIDA 33962
FOR USD 2,122,652'95
(TWO MILLION ONE HI/NDRED TWENTY TWO THOUSAND SIX HUND~D FIFTY
TWO 95/100 U.S. DOLLARS)
DATE OF EXPIRATION: JANUARY 20. 1999
PLACE OF EXPIRATION: OUR COUNTERS
st -f, ST
EXCEED_k ~O~%~A~ O~F=, ':~EDIT AND 5"HE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT:
BY THIS L~'il=r~ ,~
BENEFICIARY'S DATED CERTIFICATE PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY
VELOPMEN"r COMPANY
ISLA.ND WAL_K__D.E. _.. ~,~=~w=MENTS ASSOCIATED WITH IS_LAND
oA~LL~ MAII~fA1N 'rn-. x~-~=~,~--~ ISFACTORY TO
AND OR INAL INSPECTION SAT F
w HASE I, OR A_ _F. .... =~ ow. wv PRIOR TO THE DATE 0
~ I~R COUNTY HAS NOT ~ ....... ORMED
EXPIRY. D_ND SATISFACTORY ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE SECURITY
HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED TO AND FORMALLY ACCEPTED BY
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMR4ISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA."
IS A CONDITION OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT THAT IT S_HALL
IT - EXTENDED WITHOUT AMENDMENT FOR ONE
BE DEEMED AUTOM3%T;CALLY
YEAR FROM THE EXPIRATION DATE HEREOF, OR A.NY FUTURE EXPIRl%_TION
DATE UNLESS SIXTY (60) DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXPIRATION DATE WE
SEND'NOTICE TO YOU BY REGISTERED MAIL THAT WE ELECT NOT TO
CONSIDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT RENEWED FOR A/qY SUCH A/)DITIONAL
PERIOD.
ALL DRAFTS MUST REFERENCE THE 'NUMBER AND ISSUE DATE OF THIS
CREDIT. . . OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS
THIS LETTE__R EDITS (1993 REVISION),
I N T E P~NAT 1UN*u~
LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER P030147 PAGE NO. i
SuhlTRUST
WE HEREBY AGREE WITH YOU THAT ALL DRAFTS DRAWN IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT WILL BE DULY
HONORED UPON PRESENTATION AND DELIVERY OF THE DOCU~S
SPECIFIED ABOVE TO SUNTRUST BANK. SOU~ FLORIDA,_~L__FT-___
LAUDERDALE. FLORIDA, C/O SUNTRUST INTERN~T~O~_A~__$ER~C~6~U',
25 PARK PLACE. 16TH FLOOR,' LETTER OF CREDI~
ATLA/TTA. GEORGIA 30303 ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 07, 1~,
EXTENDED DATE.
SINCERELY,
SUNTRUST BANK, SOUTH FLORIDA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA
(404)827-6810
PAGE 2
Attama, Georgia 30303 Telex: 542210
BOARD APPROVAL OF A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS TO PAY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERIM
FOR
GOVERNMENT SERVICES FEES ORDINANCE
OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners approve a budget
amendment for Fund 111 (Unincorporated Area-Wide General Fund), wherein Reserves
would be reduced and a line item appropriation would be re-established to fund a
professional services agreement.
CONSIDERATIONS: On June 28, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners approved
retaining Mr. Alan C. Watts of the law firm of Cobb, Cole and Bell to draft an Interim
Government Services Fee Ordinance and to serve as lead counsel in the validation
process of the fee ordinance.
The Board approved funding for the development and validation of the Ordinance in the
amount of $32,500 from the Unincorporated Area-Wide General fund (Fund 111-138317-
6,34999-000000). These funds were not spent in FY1997.
The Board's budget policy and the financial process requires the funds to be
reapF, ropriated in FY1998. This budget amendment will reduce reserves and establish
the apFropriation in the FY1998 budget.
If the fee ordinance is adopted by the Board and if the validation process is successful,
the fee is anticipated to generate in excess of $1,000,000 per fiscal year in the future.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None
FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the budget amendment will reduce the Reserve for
Contingencies in the Unincorporated Area-Wide General Fund by $32,500 and establish a
line item appropriation in that fund of $32,500 to pay the professional services contract.
The affected budgets are identified below:
Unincorporated Area-Wide General Fund - Fund 111
Reduce: Reserves for Contingencies 919010-991000 ($32,500)
Increase: Other Contractual Services 138317-634999 $32,500
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the budget amendment to fund the
contract previously approved by the Board.
Jol'~ A~Y/onkosky, D~ctor
~"~(nce C~ute~o, Administrator
Community Development and Environmental Services
JAY:pc
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPROVE A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE SOUTH FLOR. IDA WATER
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF A REPLACEMENT
BRIDGE AT VALEWOOD DRIVE OVER THE COCOHATCHEE CANAL
OBJECTIVE: To present an Agreement to the Board for the maintenance and operation ora new bridge to
be designed and constructed by the South Florida Water Management District (the Dis~ct) al Valewood
Drive over the Cocohatchee Canal as pan oran ongoing District canal improvement project.
~:0N$1DERAT!ON~ The District is in the process of'widening and deepening the Cocohatchee Canal to
improve both flow characteristics for conveyance and retention/detention characteristics of'he waterway.
As part of this ongoing project, the District will be replacing the present structure over the canal at
Valewood Drive. This structure is a multiple-barrel pipe culvert. The replacement sU'ucture will be a bridge
structure. The new bridge will be either a "Con-Span" type pre-cast concrete su'ucture or a pile supporled
simple-span sumcture. In either case, the District has requested that the County assume responsibility for
the operation and maintenance of the final structure after the construction has been completed.
The County will benefit fi.om the new structure in that a new District fight-of-way permit will be issued to
the County for the operation and maintenance of the structure. 1'his right-of-way permit will allow ~he
County to maintain and operate both the bridge structure and the roadway approaches to the bridge without
hay/rig to obtain site-specific permission each time some maintenance operation is to be performed. In
addition, the new structure is anticipated to have significantly lower maintenance costs than the present
St'TUcture.
Staffhas reviewed the District's request and finds that the execution of the Agreement will be in the public
interest and will permit a safer operating condition at the existing intersection as a consequence of the new
bridge geometry. Staff recommends that the Board execute the Agreement.
Fi$CAt. IMPACT: No additional funding is sought for the implementation of the provisions of this
Agreement. Annual operating and maintenance costs are available in Fund 106, MSTD Road district $.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT; N/A
RECOMMENDATIONS: The Board approve the Agreement; authorize the Road and Bridge Section of
the Transportation Services Department to operate and maintain the new s~ructure.
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWEDEd~,r~-d'~ ~.E.~ ~e~..~ DATE" ~~-~
D~x~"d F o ' - 'spo on Services Director
Ed llschner,~Publ Works A'ami~-istr~or
Attachments: NO. I - PrOpOSed
Cooperative
Agreement
FEB 1 0 1998
ORIGINAL
O C.80~8 COOP£1~TIVE AGREEMENT
B~N THE
SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
AND
COLLIER COUNTY TI~NSPORTATION SERVICE
This AGREEMENT is entered into on ,,, between "the Parties,"
the South Florida Water Management District, a public corporation of the State of Florida
("the DISTRICT"), and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("the
COUNTY''),
hyrrNF~S~ THAT:
WHEREAS. thc DISTRICT is a public corporation of the State of Florida, cr=ated by the
Florida Legislature and given those powers and responsibilities enumerated in Chapt=r 373,
Florida Statutes to include entering into contracts with public agencies, private corporations
or other persons; and
WHEREAS, the DISTRICT is planning and designing a water control structure and channel
improvements on the Cocohatchee Canal as a third phase of the Cocohatch~ Watershed
Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, improved canal crossings are needed to meet storage, increase water levels in
the aquifer, and improve flood protection objectives; and
WHEREAS, the Florida Legislature, Statute section 3'73.0695 (2)(g), authori~s Big Cypress
Basin funds to be used for replacement of bridges resulting from Big Cypress Basin Works;
and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY is responsible for providing safe transportation n==ds to the
residents of Collier County, and operates and maintains .the secondary and arterial road access
to the major road networks; and
WHEREAS, this AGREEMENT identifies specific responsibilities of the Parties in the
implementation of replacing the culverts with a larger structure; and
WHEREAS the DISTRICT wishes to enter into a AGREEMENT with the COUNTY; and
Page 1 of 7, Contract No. C-8028
I ,TT ,CH qF..I, rT NO. ! FEB 1 0 1998
WHEREAS, the COUNTY warrants and represents' that it has no obligation or indebtedness
that would impair its ability to fulfil] the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT; and
NOW THEREFORE, the DISTRICT and the COUNTY, in consideration of the mutual
benefits flowing from each to the other, do hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I - STA'IEMENT OF WORK
1.1 The COUNTY shall, to the satisfaction of the DISTRICT, fully and timely perform
all work items described in the "Statement of Work," attached hereto as Exhibit "A,"
and made a part of this AGREEMENT.
1.2 It is the intent and understanding of the Parties that this AGREEMENT is solely for
the benefit of the COUNTY and the DISTRICT. No person or entity other than the
COUNTY or the DISTRICT shall have any rights or privileges under this
AGREEMENT in any capacity whatsoever, either as third-party beneficiary or
otherwise.
ARTICLE 2 - TERM OF THE AGREEMENT
2.1 The period of performance of this AGREEMENT shall commence on the date of this
AGREEMENT and continue for a period of eighteen (18) months.
2.2 The Parties agree that time is of the essence in the performance of each and every
obligation under this AGREEMENT.
ARTICLE 3 - CONSIDERATION
3.1 The Parties agree that each party shall assume all costs associated with its respective
obligations hereunder.
ARTICLE 4 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT/NOTICE
4.1 The Project Manager for the DISTRICT is Robert A. Laura, at 3301 Gun Club Road,
West Palm Beach, FL 33406, telephone (561) 687-6238. The Project Manager for the
COUNTY is Edward J. Kant, at County Government Center, 3301 Tamiami Trail
East, Naples, FL 34112, telephone (941) 774-8494. The Parties shall direct all matters
arising in connection with the performance of this AGREEMENT, other than invoices
and notices, to the attention of the Project Managers for attempted resolution or
action. The Project Managers shall be responsible for overall coordination and
oversight relating to the performance of this AGREEMENT.
Page 2 of 7, Contract No. C-8028 ~
A'Fi'A(.',HI~ENT HO.. / ....
PAGE 2.- OF /o
4.2 Ali notices, demands, or other communications to the COUNTY under this
AGREEMENT shall be in writing and sent by certified mail to:
Collier County Transportation Service
County Government Center
3301 Tamiami Trail East
Naples, FL 34112
All notices to the DISTRICT under this AGREEMENT shall be in writing and sent
by certified mail to:
South Florida Water Management District
Attn: Procurement Division
3301 Gun Club Road
P. O. Box 24680
West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680
The COUNTY shall also provide a copy of all notices to the DISTRICT'S Project
Manager. All notices required by this AGREEMENT shall be considered delivered
upon receipt. Should either party change its address, written notice of such new
address shall promptly be sent to the other party.
All correspondence to the DISTRICT under this AGREEMENT shall reference the
DISTRICT'S Contract Number C-8028.
ARTICLE 5 - TERMINATION/REMEDIES
5.1 If either par~y fails to fulfill its obligations under this AGREEMENT in a timely and
proper manner, the other party shall have the right to terminate this AGREEMENT
by giving written notice of any deficiency. The party in default shall then have ten
(10) calendar days from receipt of notice to correct the deficiency. If the defaulting
party fails to correct the deficiency within this time, this AGREEMENT shall
terminate at the expiration of the ten (10) day time period.
5.2 If either pa~y initiates legal action, including appeals, to enforce this AGREEMENT,
the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover a reasonable attorney's fee, based upon
the fair market value of the services provided.
ARTICLE 6 - RECORDS RETENTION/OWNERSHIP
6.1 The COUNTY shall maintain records and the DISTRICT shall have inspection and
audit rights as follows:
Page 3 of 7, Contract No. C-8028
~o.~
AIIACI-IM£hq' HO. /
.... FEB I 0 1998
PAGE .,~ OF la
A. Maintenance of Records: The COUNTY shall maintain all records and repons
directly or indirectly related to the negotiation or performance of this AGREEMENT
including supporting documentation research or reports. Such records shall be
maintained and made available for inspection for a period of five years from
completing performance and receiving final payment under this AGREEMENT.
B. Examination of Records; The DISTRICT or its designated agent shall have the
right to examine in accordance with generally accepted governmental auditing
standards all records directly or indirectly related to this AGREF_JVIENT. Such
examination may be made only within five years from the date of this AGREEMENT
and upon reasonable notice, time and place.
C. Extended Availability of Records for Legal Disputes: In the event that the
DISTRICT should become involved in a legal dispute with a third party arising from
performance under this AGREEMENT, the COUNTY shall extend the period of
maintenance for all records relating to the AGREEMENT until the final disposition
of the legal dispute, and all such records shall be made readily available to the
DISTRICT.
ARTICLE 7 . STANDARDS OF COMPLIANCE
7.1 The COUNTY, its employees, subcontractors or assigns, shall comply with all
applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the performance
of this AGREE3IENT. The DLSTRICI' undertakes no duty to ensure such compliance,
but will attempt to advise the COUNTY, upon request, as to any such laws of which
it has present knowledge.
7.2 The laws of The State of Florida shall govern all aspects of this AGREEMENT. In
the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this
AGREEMENT, venue shall be in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit for claims under state
law and in the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in
federal court.
7.3 The COUNTY shall allow public access to all project documents and materials in
· accordance with the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. Should the COUNTY
assert any exemptions to the requirements of Chapter 119 and related Statutes, the
burden of establishing such exemption, by way of injunctive or other relief as
provided by law, shall be upon the COUNTY.
7.4 Subject to Governing Board approval, the DISTRICT will waive application
processing fees applicable to the right-of-way occupancy permit consistent with Task
6 of Exhibit "A." The COUNTY shall be responsible for any fees associated with any
future permit modifications.
Page 4 of 7, Contract No. C-8028 ~~l[
[PAGE ~ 0F /'~
I I
7.5 The COUNTY hereby assures that no person shall be discriminated against on the
grounds of race, color, creed, national origin, handicap, age, or sex, in any activity
under this AGREFM~ENT.The COUNTY shall take all measures necessary to
effectuate these assurances.
7.6 In the event a dispute arises which the Project Managers cannot resolve between
themselves, the Parties shall have the option to submit to non-binding mediation. The
mediator or mediators shall be impartial, shall be selected by the Parties, and the cost
of the mediation shall be borne equally by the Parties. The mediation process shall be
confidential to the extent permitted by law.
ARTICLE 8 - RELATIONSI-DP BETWEEN THE PARTIES
g.l The COUNTY is an independent contractor and is not an employee or agent of the
DISTRICT. Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall be interpreted to establish any
relationship other than that of an independent contractor, between the DISTRICT and
the COUNTY, its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after the
performance of this AGREEMENT. The COUNTY is free to provide similar services
for others.
8.2 The COUNTY shall not assign, delegate, or otherwise transfer its rights and
obligations as set fo~h in this AGREEMENT without the prior written consent of the
DISTRICT. Any attempted assignment in violation of this provision shall be void.
ARTICLE 9 - GENERAL PROVISIONS
9.1 Notwithstanding any provisions of this AGREF3'IENT to the contrary, the Parties
shall not be held liable for any failure or delay in the performance of this
AGREEMENT that arises from fires, floods, strikes, embargoes, acts of the public
enemy, unusually severe weather, outbreak of war, restraint of Government, riots, civil
commotion, force majeure, act of God, or for any other cause of the same character
which is unavoidable through the exercise of due care and beyond the control of the
Parties. Failure to perform shall be excused during the continuance of such
circumstances, but this AGREEMENT shall otherwise remain in effect. This
provision shall not apply if the "Statement of Work" of this AGREEMENT specifies
that performance by COUNTY is specifically required during the occurrence of any
of the events herein mentioned.
9.2 In the event any provisions of this AGREF_aMENT shall conflict, or appear to conflict,
the AGREEMENT, including all exhibits, attachments and all documents specifically
incorporated by reference, shall be interpreted as a whole to resolve any inconsistency.
9.3 Failures or waivers to insist on strict performance of any covenant, condition, or
provision of this AGREEMENT by the Parties, their successors and assigns shall not
Pa~e 5 of 7, Contract No. C-8028
I ATT ,CHMENT NO. / FEB 1 0 1998
be deemed a waiver of any of its rights or remedies, nor shall it relieve the other party
from performing any subsequent obligations strictly in accordance with the terms of
this AGREEMENT. No waiver shall be effective unless in writing and signed by the
party against whom enforcement is sought. Such waiver shall be limited to provisions
of this AGREEMENT specifically referred to therein and shall not be deemed a
waiver of any other provision. No waiver shall constitute a continuing waiver unless
the writing states otherwise.
9.4 Should any term or provision of this AGREEMENT be held, to any extent, invalid or
unenforceable, as against any person, entity or circumstance during the term hereof,
by force of any statute, law, or ruling of any forum of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity shall not affect any other term or provision of this AGREEMENT, to the
extent that the AGREEMENT shall remain operable, enforceable and in full force and
effect to the extent permitted by law.
9.5 This AGREEMENT may be amended only with the written approval of the Parties.
9.6 This AGREEMENT states the entire understanding and agreement between the Parties
and supersedes any and all written or oral representations, statements, negotiations,
or agreements previously existing between the Parties with respect to the subject
matter of this AGREEMENT. The COUNTY recognizes that any representations,
statements or negotiations made by DISTRICT staff do not suffice to legally bind the
DISTRICT in a contractual relationship unless they have been reduced to writing and
signed by an authorized DISTRICT representative. This AGREEMENT shall inure to
the benefit of and shall be binding upon the Parties, their respective assigns, and
successors in interest.
Page 6 of 7, Contract No. C-8028
ATT~,CHMENT NO. / ~'~
- FEB 1 0 1998
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties or their duly authorized representatives hereby execute this
AGREF.,MENT on the date first written above.
LEGAL PORM APPROVED
~.. ~,~,.~.~.~OmC~ OF COUNSF~ SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
/' 7-
Deputy Executive I~irector
ATTEST: COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY
DWIGHT E. BRa"K, CLER~ COMMISSIONERS
By:
Chairman, ~srbara B. ~erry
form & l~~ei~nzy
~t ~unty Attorney
Page 7 of 7, Contract No. C-8028
[ ITACHI~£NI NO._ / .
AGE_ '7 ,, OF_
C-~02~
EXH~IT "A"
START OF WORK
1.0 BACKGROUND
The South Florida Water Management District (District) is currently undertaking a four-phase water
management improvement plan in the Cocohatchee Canal Watershed in the Big Cypress Basin.
The Cocohatchee Canal is adjacent to Immokalee Road in Collier County, Florida. The purpose
of this improvement plan is to prevent saltwater intrusion, re, duce overdrainage in the watershed,
and enhanc~ flood protection. The Cocohatchee Canal drains a watershed of approximately 186
square miles, consisting of mixed development, agriculture, and natural areas. The water resources
of the Cocohatchee Canal Basin are unique in that they include the sensitive environmental corridor
of the Bird RookeD' Swamp, Corkscrew Marsh, and Corkscrew Sanctuary.
Phase I was completed in 1994 and consisted of construction of one water control structure
(salinity barrier), and improvements to approximately 2,000 linear feet of can',,l in the western
portion of the canal. Phase 2 is ongoing and consists of construction of a second water control
structure, and improvements to approximately 6,000 linear feet of canal in between Structure
Number I and Structure Number 2. Remaining Phase 2 improvements include replacement of the
Palm River Boulevard bridge and one utility crossing. Phase 3 is currently in the design stage and
includes construction of a third water control structure and improvements to approximately 5.5
linear miles of canal. Phase 4 is currently in the planning stage and will include improvements to
approximately 4.5 linear miles of canal.
The scope of work of this Agreement is to identify responsibilities in the replacement of the
culverts crossing the Cocohatchee Canal at Valewood Drive (Quail Creek) with a larger bridge
crossing the canal as part of the Phase 3 Improvements. The new bridge should meet the
.requirements identified in Task 3 of the Scope of Services. This bridge replacement was identified
in an HydrologicfHydraulic (H/H), study of the Cocohatchee Canal conducted by the South Florida
Water Management District in Fe.bruary, 1997.
2.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to identify the specific responsibilities of each party in the
implementation of replacing the culverts with a larger structure. The Scope of Services is divided
into specific tasks to identify the responsibilities of each party.
Page I of 3, Ex_hibit "A~" Contract No. C-8028
ATTACHMEN'F NO. /
PAGE ~ OF /o
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
3.1 Task 1 - Engineering Design
This task consists of the engineering and design work to prepare a set of construction plans
and specifications for a new canal crossing. The District shall be responsible for this task
subject to provisions of this Agreement and description of the other tasks herein. The new
bridge design shall meet the hydraulic conditions required to provide the desired level of flood
protection. The canal and new bridge structure shall be able to pass 606 cubic feet per second
with a water surface elevation not higher then 11.5 feet NGVD, (National Geodetic Vertical
Datum of 1929) and energy head losses not more than 0.05 feet. The new bridge shall have
two northbound and two southbound traffic lanes with sidewalks on both sides and on-road
bike paths on both sides. The new bridge will have a thirty-foot, striped median and will meet
County codes and transportation requirements in effect at commencement of this Agreement.
No improvements to Immokalee Road in regards to the design and construction of the new
bridge is pan of this Agreement with the exception of modifications to the turnout. Any
additional improvements to Valewood Drive or Immokalee Road not included in this task will
be funded by the County. The District will obtain a County right-of-way permit for any work
to be performed within the right-of-way of Immokalee Road (CR 846).
3.2 Task 2 - Environmental Permi~ng
This task consists of obtaining environmental regulatory permits, to complete the other tasks
herein. The District shall be responsible for all funding and other technical aspects of this task
subject to provisions of this Agreement and description of the other tasks herein.
3.3 Task 3 - Land Certification
This task consists of obtaining construction access and staging areas to complete the other
tasks herein. The District shall be responsible for all funding and other technical aspects of
this task subject to provisions of this Agreement and description of the other tasks herein. The
District will obtain the real estate instruments needed to construct the new structure.
3.4 Task 4 - Removal of Existing Structures and Excavation
This task involves the removal of the existir, g culverts and the canal excavation required to
obtain the desired cross-sections. The District shall be responsible for culvert removal and
excavation. The District shall coordinate the relocation of any utilities.
The new canal cross section shall be excavated 75 feet upstream and downstream of the new
bridge faces and transition into the existing canal cross-section. The new cross-section shall
have a trapezoidal shape, a bottom width of 35 feet, two horizontal to one ,tertical side slopes
(2:1), and a bottom elevation of 6.5 feet NGVD.
pa_ye 9 nfa. l:.~hihit "A." Contract No. C-$028
Ip OE : FEB I 0 1998
3.5 Task 5 - Construction of New Bridge
This task consists of constructing a new roadway crossing on the Cocohatchee Canal to replace
the existing structure according to the plans and specifications developed in Task I. The
District shall be responsible for this task.
3.6 Task 6 - District Right of Way Permit
The County shall obtain a District right-of-way permit to operate and maintain a canal crossing
and encroachment within the District fight-of-way. Within thirty (30) days of the completion
of the construction and acceptance by the County, the County shall file an application for a
right-of-way permit pursuant to Chapter 373.085, Florida Statutes. The County shall be
responsible for the completeness of the application and provide such information as is
reasonably necessary to complete the application. The District shall issue to the County a
right-of-way occupancy permit within 90 days of receipt of a completed application and the
County shall accept the permit and any conditions. Attachment "1" is an example of Special
Conditions for another bridge permitted to Collier County located at Livingston Road. Special
Conditions are site specific, and cannot be furnished until the application is reviewed.
Attachment "l" also contains Limited Conditions that apply to all permits. District staff will
recommend that any application processing fees applicable to the right-of-way occupancy
permit be waived. However, final determination for such waiver must be made by the District's
Governing Board. Regardless of the foregoing, the County shall be responsible for any fees
associated with any future permit modifications.
3.7 Task 7 - Operations and Maintenance
The County shall be responsible for all operations and maintenance of the canal crossing in
accordance with the County's ongoing road and bridge maintenance plans subject to conditions
and terms of the right-of-way occupancy permit referenced in Task 6.
Page 3 of 3. Exhibit "A," Contract No. C-8028
ATTACHMENT NO. /
PAGE /'~ OF ~',~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTE THREE (3) QUITCLAIM DEEDS, IN ORDER TO RECONVEY
PREVIOUS INTERESTS OBTAINED BY PINE AIR LAKES PUD
~ That the Board of County Commissioners execute three (3)
Quitclaim Deeds to reconvey to three property owners a portion of a temporary
drainage easement recorded in Official Records Book 2007, Page 1586, of the
Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The property is situated in Section
11, Towr~ship 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, within the
boundaries of the Pine Air Lakes PUD.
CONSIDERATION_: Briefly, the Pine Air Lakes PUD was amended to require the
owner to convey a temporary drainage easement until such time as approval of
the developer's Site Development Plan. A Drainage Easement, recorded in O.R.
Book 2007, Page 1568, was conveyed to Collier County as part of the Pine
Ridge Industrial Park MSTU Project with the condition that the interest shall
terminate when the Board of County Commissioners authorizes the owner to
assume the water management system.
The Developer of Pine Air Lakes dedicated a temporary drainage easement to
Collier County and the Pine Air Lakes Foundation, Inc. on the Plat of Pine Air
Lakes Unit One, as recorded in Plat Book 24, Page 98 through 101, of the Public
Records of Collier County, Florida. Said dedication was intended to be replaced
by a permanent drainage easement as each portion of the Pine Air Lakes Project
was developed. The Lowe's Home Centers' parcel is the first parcel to be
developed which is encumbered by the temporary drainage easement.
Accordingly, a portion of the temporary drainage easement had been replaced
by two permanent drainage easements recorded in O.R. Book 2332, Page 3214,
and O.R. Book 2332, Page 3224, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida. That portion of the temporary drainage easement which is no longer
necessary shall be reconveyod by Collier County to the developer via Quitclaim
Deeds. In this case, three Quitc;aim Deeds are necessary because the property
encumbered by the temporary drainagc easement is owned by three separate
entities. The portion of the temporary drainage easement which is not conveyed
to these entities will remain in effect. The same process will be followed for any
future development which occurs on the property encumbered by the temporary
drainage easement.
A portion of the temporary drainage easement shall be reconveyed to the
owners by three (3) Quitclaim Deeds. The documents are attached and have
been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office, John Houldsworth,
Senior Engineer, Project Review Services, and Harold E. Huber, Project
Manager, Office of Capital Projects Management.
FISCAL IMPACT: Staff estimates that the total cost for the recordation of the
.~three (3) Quitclaim Deeds in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, is
$51.60. All costs and expenses will be paid by the developer of Pine Air Lakes
PUD.
~_~ANAGEMENT PLAN: None.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the
three (3) Quitclaim Deeds, and authorize Staff to proceed and record all
necessary documents in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida.
xJ~/~'o-u rd a-n ,/~ r' Prop~ rty ~peCialist
~R~al Property Management Department
l-l~ro~-d E. Huber, Project Manager
Office of Capital Projects Management ..
~dffi°:~ ' C~a°p.~Za? ~ ~ctE; ' M~:rne~°erm o nt
APPROVED BY'.~~_ _~~:~~_~'~' _- Date/-..~o-.~'
Ed Iischner, Adr~inistrator
Public Works Division
PROJECT: Pin4 Air Lei<et
PARCEL: 002 (Naple~ Plaza)
FOLIO: 00240400004
Qun'cLAIM DEED
THIS QUITCLAIM DEED executed ~tl day of .
19 .. by COLLIER COUNTY. a political subdlvttton of the State of Florida.
whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiemi Trail East. Naples. Florida 34112
(hereinafter calted the Grantor). to NAPLES PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. I
Florida Limited Partnemhip. whose mailing addrell il 40 Oak Hollow. Suite 275.
Southfield. Michigan 48304 (hereinafter celled the Grantee).
(Wherever used herein the term~ "Grantor" and 'Grantee" Include Ill the
parties to thl, Instrument and their respective helm. ~ucolelOra end Sleighs.)
WITNESSETH: That the Grantor. for and in consideration of the sum of
Ten Dollars ($10.00) in hand paid by the said Grantee. the receipt whereof i$
hereby acknowledged, does hereby mmlse, release, and quitclaim unto the laid
Grantee forever, all the right, flue. interest, claim and demand which the ,.aid
Grantor has in and to the following described lot. piece or parcel of lind Iltuate.
lying and being in Collier CountT. Florida. to wit:
SEE EXHIBIT "A* attached hereto and made · part hereof.
Subject to easementl, restrictions, end reservations of record.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the' lame together with ell appurtenancel
thereunto belonging or in anywise appadaining, and iii the estate, dght. title.
interest, lien. equity and claim whatsoever of the laid Grantor.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Grantor has ceulad thele prelentl to be
executed the day and year flint above written.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA
By:..
, Deputy Clerk ~ !~. ~ . Chairman
(OFFICIAL SEAL)
P~tp4~d
.
Legal Description
being a par~ of Parcel 2, Pine Air Lakes
Unit One, Plat Book 24, pages 98 through I01,
Collier County, Florida
CPortion o£Temporary Drainage E~ement Recorded in O.R. Book
2007, pages 1586 to 1590 to be vacated)
('Naples PI~.~ Limited Partnership Portion)'
Revised December 1, 1997
That part of Parcel 2, according to the plat of Pine Air Lakes Unit One, Plat Book 24, pages 98
through 101, Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the southwest comer o£Parcel 4, according to said plat of Pine Air Lakes Unit
One;
thence along the north right-of-way line of Naples Boulevard (120 foot right-of-way) according
to said plat westerly 309.25 feet along the arc ora circular curve concave to the south having a
radius o£ 975.00 through a central angle of' 18'10'24" and being subtended by a chord which
bears North 80'19'01" West 307.96 feet;
thence leaving the north right-of-way line of said Naples Boulevard along a non-tangential line
North 01048'29'' West 188.08 feet;
thence Nor'th 01°08'21'' East 661.54 feet to the Point of Beginning of the portion ofthe
temporary drainage easement to be vacated;
thence along said easement North 79°03'26'' West 49.46 feet;
thence leaving said easement North 26*59'25" West 15.05 feet;
thence North 01°08'21' East 13.32 feet to a point on said easement;
thence along said easement South 79*03'26"East 56.66 feet;
thence leaving said easement South 01'08'21" We~t 25.37 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Subject to easements and restrictions of record.
Bearings are based on the north line of said Parcel 4 being North 88*51 '39" West.
WILSON, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC.
P, egistered Engineers and Land Surveyors
.' By: ~p ~'Ma one, p 'S~~~~l_ Date
· ':¢~ o_~P. Y ' ' 'L~.
'.. '" Cemficate of authorization #
"Not valid unless embossed with the Professional's seal.
Ref,. 2G-472, sheet 13
~1~ X,,Yv/ll..'<l,~l"d, Mil I.l!l{, I~^I{T~N ~. [~I:I;K. ]Nl:.
'2~\: IL~d~.~ L.,,~c. S,~rc 200. l'q.q,l[.,. Fh,r~d.~ 14105.~$07 ° Ph ~)4 I.o'~;.40~0 ~:~ 941.64 1.
'". ,l'/,. 1,' ,, ...., ....... ,, ,:,.,, ...... [ FEB ! 0 1998
PROJECT: Pine Air Lakes
PARCEL: 002 (Lowe's Home C, onler~)
FOLIO: 0024040~004
QUITCLAIM DEED
THIS QUITCLAIM DEED executed thil day of ,
19 , by COLLIER COUNTY, e political ~ubdMaion of the State of Florida,
whose mailing address I$ 3301 Tam[ami Trail East, Naplea, Florida 34112
(hereinafter called the Grantor), to LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC., I North
Carolina corporation, whose mailing address ia P.O. Box 1111, N. Wilkesboro,
North Carolina 28656 (hereinafter called the Grantee).
('Wherever used herein the terml 'Grantor' and 'Grantee' Include ii1 the
parties to this instrument and their respective helm, succalaorl and Ilaignl.)
WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the lure of
Ten Dollars ($10,00) in hand paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof il
hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, .release, and quitclaim unto the said
Grantee forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the laid
Grantor has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land situate,
lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to wit:
SEE EXHIBIT 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof,
Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservatlonl of record.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the lame together with iii appurtenlncee
thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and ell the estate, fight, title,
interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the laid Grantor.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor haa caused these presenta to be
executed the day and year first above written.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clark BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:.
, Deputy Clerk ~ B. a~'~, Chain~an
(OFFICIAL SEAL)
EXHIBIT "A"
SURVEYORS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS. CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
Legal Description
being a part of Parcel 2, Pine Air Lakes
Unit One, Plat Book 24, pages 98 through 101,
Collier County, Florida
(Portion of Temporary Drainage Easement recorded in
O.R.. Book 2007, pages 1586 to 1590 to be vacated)
(Lowe's Home Center, Inc. Portion)
That part of Parcel 2, according to the plat of Pine Air Lakes Unit One, Plat Book 24, pages 98
through 101, Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the southwest comer of Parcel 4, according to said plat of Pine Air Lakes Unit
One;
thence ,long the north right-of-way line of Naples Boulevard (120 foot right-of-way) according
to said plat westerly 309.25 feet along the acc ora circular curve concave to the south having a
radius of 975.00 through a central angle of 18°10'24" and being subtended by a chord which
bears North 80°19'01'' West 307.96 feet;
thence leaving the north right-of-way line of said Naples Boulevard along a non-tangential line
North 01°48'29" West 188.08 feet;
thence North 01°08'21" East 661.54 feet to the Point of Begirming of the portion ofthe
temporary drainage easement to be vacated;
thence continue North 01°08"21" East 25.37 feet to the north line of said easement;
thence along the north line of said easement South 79003'26" East 790.54 feet
thence leaving said line South 01 °08'20" West 25.37 feet to the south line of said easement;
thence along said easement North 79°03'26" West 790.54 feet to the Point of Beginning
ALSO INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING:
Commencing at the northeast comer of said Parcel 4;
thence South 88o51'39" East 72.76 feet to the Point of Begirming of the portion of the temporary
drainage easement to be vacated;
thence along said easement in the following two (2) described courses:
1) northerly 128.46 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave easterly having a radius of
558.00 feet through a central angle of 13°11'24" and being subtended by a chord which bears
North 16032'39'' East 128.17 feet;
2) North 23°08'21'' East 205.94 feet;
thence leaving said easement South 01o08'20" West 314.51 feet;
thence North 88°51'39" West 111.20 feet to the Point of Beginning;
Subject to easements and restrictions of record.
Bearings are based on the north line of said Parcel 4 being North 88°51'39" West.
WILSON. ~,~ILLER, B^RTO~q & PEEK. INc.
3200 Bade¥ Lan,:. Su,te 200. Naple'~. Flor,da 34105-8507 * Ph 941-649-4~0
I
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 2 of 3
WILSON, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC.
Registered Engineers and Land Surveyors
' ~,,, ~t val. {~ unl'~'ss'%mbossed with the Professional's s~,,al. '., ,,l~f.' i. 20-472, sheet 12
F.,XHIBIT NA#
~agO 3 Of 3
PROJECT: PIn~ Air Lakes
PARCEL: 002 (Airport Road L.P.)
FOLIO: 00240400004
QUITCLAIM DEED
THIS QUITCLAIM DEED executed thai .... day of ,
19 , by COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Fiodda,
whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiaml Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112
(hereinafter called the Grantor), to AIRPORT ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a
Flodda Limited Partnership, whose mailing addresa i~ Poat Office Box 893,
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48303 (hereinafter called the Grantee).
(Wherever used herein the terms 'Grantor' and 'Grantee' Include iii the
parties to this instrument and their respective heirs, successors and alalgrt$.)
WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of
Ten Dollars ($10.00) in hand paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof is
hereby acknowledged, does hereby remtse, release, and quitclaim unto the said
Grantee forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said
Grantor has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land situate,
lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to wit:
SEE EXHIBIT 'A' attached hereto and made a part hereof,
Subject to easements, restrictions, and resarvationa of record.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all appurtenances
thereunto belonging or In anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title,
interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said Grantor.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused thasa presants to be
executed the day and year first above written.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
, Deputy Clerk ~ B. ~rry , Chairman
(OFFICIAL SEAL) Prtp~red
~dl Ir. Ashton,
Off Ice of
(~t) 77~
beLn8 a ~ o£ P&rcel 2, Pi. ne Ah' Lakes
Unit One, Plat ~ook 24, pages 98 O'u'ough 101, Colli~ Count, Florida
(Portion of Tcmpora.,3, DraLnage Easement recorded in
O.R. Book 2007, i~tges 1586 t~ou~ 1590 to be vacated)
(Airport Ro~l LLn~ted Pml.ners~p Portion)
Revi~d December' I, 1997
Tlmt p~rt of'Parcel 2, according to the plat of Pine Air Lakes Un. it One, Plat Book 24, pages 98 through 101,
Collier CountT. Flori~ being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at t~¢ non3~,~s~ corner of Parcel 4, according to u, Jd plat of Pine Air Lakes Unh One;
mence Soum 88o51 '39" East 72.76 feet to me Point of Beginning of me portion of the temporary dra. inage
easement to be vacated;
thence Soum 88°51 '39" Ea. st 111.20 feet;
mence North 01°08'20" East :314.51 feet to a point on raid easement:
thence along sa.id e.a.~ment in the following four (4) described cours,.s:
1) North 23°05'21" 'East 38.03 feet;
2) northerly 111.05 feet ~long the arc ora circulm' curve concave westerly' lmving a radius o1'542.00 feet
th. rough a central angle of ! 1°44'21'' and being subtended by n chord which bears North 17"16'11" East
110.85 feet;
3) North l 1°24'00'' Easl 45.79 feet:
4) North 79°03'26" West 53.99
thence Ica¥ing said cas~mcnt North 01°08'20'' East 25.37 feet to a point on
t.,hcncc along mid ca~mcnt in thc following two (2) dc~ribed courts:
1) South 79~03'26'' -East $S.51 feet',
2) North l 1°24'00'' East 123.44 feet to a point on thc westerly boundary ofthc drainage and la, kc maintenance
casement as recorded in said plat of Pine Air Lakes Unit One;
mcnce ~.Tong said ca.,~mcnt in mc following two (2) dc~r~[",ed
South 01°08'21'' V/cst 731.62 feet:
2) Southerly and southeasterly 35.55 feet along the arc ora circular curve concave ~ortheastcrly having a
rudius o£ 29.60 fcct through a central angle of 68°49'02'' and b~ing subtended by a chord which bears
South 33°]6' 10" East 33.45 £cct to a point on said temporary drainage casement:
thc~cc alon~ said cascm¢~I in thc f'oHou,~ng three (3) described courses:
1) NorTh ~g~5l'~9" West 176.15 feet:
2) northwesterly 63.88 feet along thc arc ora circular curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 40.00
feet through a ccnlraJ angle ol'91°30'27'' and being subtended by a chord which bears North 43006'25"
West 57.3 ! £eet;
3) Northerly 71. [2 f'¢¢t along the arc ora circular curve concave Io the Soulheast having a radius of 558.00
feel through a central angle of 7°18'09" and being sublended by a chord which be. ars North 06°l'/'$3"East,
71.07 feet to the Point o£ Beginning.
Subj~-I to e.a.s:mcnLs and restrictions o1' record.
13eadngs are based on !he north line oft, aid Parcel 4 being North 88°$1'39" West
WD..SON, I~,ELLER., BARTON & PEEK, INC.
Registered Engineers and Land Surveyors
C~;'ca~¢ of aut.horizafion #LB-4k, /
Not va]id un]ess emboss,~ ~U% ~¢'~,:ssional'~
~'XHXBXT #A~
· a9® 2 or 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
APPROVE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH HOLE, MONTES AND
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR IMMOKALEE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 69101;
CIE 08
.OBJECTIVE: To receive Board of County Commissioners' approval of Supplemental
Agreement (S/A) No. 3 for Immokalee Road four laning improvements.
DESCRIPTION: The firm of Hole, Montes an'd Associates, Inc. (HMA) completed contract
work under original scope in 1993. Final payment was made to close out the Contract. The project
has not been constructed. Staff is prepared to move forward with construction. In order to do so,
the construction plans and permits need to be updated to account for changes since the plans were
delivered to Collier County. Since HMA is the designer and well familiar with the plans, it is
prudent to have them perform the revision to their design. Staffhas prepared this S/A No. 3, to
reopen the original contract and have HMA perform a review study necessary for updating the
construction plans and permits. The result of the study will determine the scope of plans and permit
update and wilt provide the associated costs. Staffwill come back with Supplemental Agreement
No. 4 outlining the costs to update the construction plans and permits for the Board's approval.
Original Contract Amount: $150,000.00
S/A No. 1 $299,756.53 - Phase II: Plans design and permitting services.
S/A No. 2 $ 25,921.62 - Additional permitting and design services.
This S/A No. 3 $ 35,900.00
Proposed Contract Amount $511,578.15
--~2 FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $35,900.00 are available in:
Fund No. 331 Road Impact District
Cost Center No. 163650 Road Impact Construction
Project No. 69101 Immokalee Road
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This Capital Improvement Element No. 08 is
consistent with the Transportation sub-element of the Growth Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners:
(1) Authorize and approve S/A No. 3.
(2) Direct the Board Chairman to execute S/A No. 3.
~PREPARED BY: '~-' ' '~"" "'""Y""'-'-"~'a~a~¢.~ PM~-- Date: /'"2'~""P'~'
Project Man~er, OCPM
1~.- I
Executive Summary
Supple'mental AgTecmcnt with Hole, Montes and Associates
KEVIEWED BY' , Date:
REVI£WED BY: ~ 7J ?t'~.~ ~/fff- C Date: ~~
David Bobanick
Director, Tran,portation Services
Stephen Y. C~nell
Director, Purchasing Director
REVIEWED BY:~
Date:
Ed IIsctmer
Public Works Administrator
Attacba-nent: S/A No. 3
S/A NO. 3
. .. ! SLrPPLEMEFfTAL AGREEMENT TO
. CONSLrLTING ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT : ...
.. .: THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMEHT, made and entered imo this day of , :" ·
.. 1998, by and between thc Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, · political subdivision of ';
: the State of Florida, hereinafter called the COUI',rlW, and Hole, Montes and Associates, Inc. of?IS Tenth .'
:' Street, South, Naples, Florida 34102, duly authorized to conduct business in the Stale of'Florida, hergnaft~ ,'..' ..
" called the CONSULTANT, :
.. WITNESSETH
: WHEREAS, the COUNTY and CONSUl. TANT heretol'ore on 21 May 1991 enlered into an Agreern~t !. ......
...: .. ' whereby the CO~ retained ~he CONSULTANT to furnished certain consulting services in connection with :'
· .. ," proposed construction of C.I~. 846 four laning improvem.ents, Phase I&II, (Icl. I-?$ to Jct. C.IL 951), Courtly
· ' ' Project No. 69101; and, . .". . ·
WHEP, EAS, the County desires to modify the terms of said Agreement, and toward thai end it is necessary
to:
TO REOPEN, REVISE AN'D/OR EXPAND UPON THE SCOPE OF OR.I~INAI., SERVICES OF
' PROFF. CT SPEC~ICALLY REL.,~,TING TO ADDITIONAL PLANS PREPARATION AND TO
· "- CONDENSATE THE CONSLrLTANT FOR ADDITIONAL COSTS TO BE INCURRED FOR SAID
ADDITIONAL SERVICES. CONSULTANT'S FEE PROPOSAL FOR. ADDITIONAL SERVICES DA~
30 DECEMBER 199'7 IS ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT "A" AND IS HEREBY INCORPOR. A. TED AND MADE
A FORMAL PART OF TI-IlS SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 3.
NOW THEREFORE, lhe Consulting Engineering Services Agreemen! is hereby am'ended and supplemented
O as follows:
~ 1. CONSULTANT and COI..rN'rY agree to reopen Ihe Consulting Engineering Services Agr~*~nent in
order for the CONSULTANT to perform the services requesled oflhe CONSULTANT.
2.CONSULTANT ~,hal! perform services for U~e cons~roclion plans r~-'vlsion and ~ in
Exhibit "A" anached her~o.
3. Contr',~,-I fee ~djurrmen: and s~av,~ (Sa Supplemera~ Al~eme~ No.
3.1 Original m~i,,,~,,, corm-·el tee ,. $1 $0,000.00
3.2 S/A ,"go. ! -
3.3 .~'A No. 2 - $ 25,921.62
3.,1 This S/A No. 3 n-.a~imum co~n<l fee - $ 35.900.00
Maximum and c,,~',,~,i cooir'ac~ Ibc -~$5 ! 1,57~. 15
4. Corm"~ time adjumnen~:
Ir~-'n~e 60 calendar days
5. Contract con~l~ion time to be daermined by Notice to Proc~. ".
6. The rc~s~ and cu,~e,,~ lump sum con,'act amount as ·tared above includes costs for overhead, fringe :
henefits, om.of-pockei eq>cnscs, profit margin, and all other direct and indirect costa and expenses.
7. E.xccpt as hereby modified, amended, or changed, all of the terms and conditions ofsald original
: Consulting Engineering Services Agrctment shall rcraain in full force and effect.
'- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ~he par~ies hereto have caused these presents to be executed the day amd year first ;.
above v,'ritlc'n. ' '
~ Pmj~t No. 69101
S/A NO. 3 ,.
AS TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS:
.+. 'k:.
" '~,trp~ov~4 ~ to t'onn a l,~'~'~'~t'~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO~ ...:.;..
'1'" "~!:::'~::'" ' COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ; ' ·
· ' O .
'.,'ii.': .'..... ,~,.,0, ~.,~,~ : ,
":'~-':" ; ~ ,--
. -.t.4 ~~t ~unty AtOmy
· .'.t.. '.': .. BY: ~I~ ~, 8~, ~, t...
...... · .. ,
"'" AS TO ~ CONS~T~: '" .,
;". "'" "; HOLE, MO~S ~ ASS~S, ~C,
· :.' ... ' .... .
: '"': SIG~D, SEALED, A~ DEL~RED '...
' ~ THE P~S~~
FIRST WI~SS ~E ~E~
SECO~) WlTNESS ~AME ~E~ N~d E. Dewb~rst, Vfc~ Pr~fdent
(CORPO~ SEAL) - .
STATE OF FLORIDA
COb~TY OF LEE "
. Before mc, the undersigned authori~,, this day personally appeared Robert L. Murray and Ned £.
Dcwhirst, to mc well known and known to me to be Sr. Vice President and Vice President respectively, of the
Corporation named in the foregoing Agreement, .and they severally acknowledged to and before me that they
'.. executed said Agreement on behalf of and in the name of said Corporation as such officer~; that the seal affixed
to said Agreement is the corporate seal of said Corporation and that it was affixed therelo by due and regular
Corporale authority; that they are duly authorized by raid Corporation to execute said Agreement and that said
~ Agreement is lhe free act and deed of raid Corporation.
I~ ~,qTN'ESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand and affixed my official seal this ~/,~.~ day
l~otlrv_Public i~nd foffthe County and State afor~id.
:.'. ' ¢ My Commission Expir~:
ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS
December 30, 1997
Mr. Micah K. Massaquoi, P.E. RECBVED
Collier County Government Center, Bldg. D
Office of Capital Projects Management
3301 East Tamiami Trail DE0 31 1997
N.aples, FL 33962 Urrlt,;r..ur ~r~r~lRL
RE: IMMOKALEE ROAD, PHASE II
COLLIER COUNTY PROJECT NO. 69101
HMA FILE NO. 89.99
Dear Mr. Massaquoi:
In accordance with your request and based on your letter to Robert Murray dated
October 24, 1997, our understanding of discussions at our meeting of November 18,
1997, Ed Kant's comment memorandum dated December 19, 1997, and further
discussions on December 30, 1997, Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc. (HMA) is pleased
to submit this revised proposal to Collier County (County) for providing professional
engineering services to perform a "mini PD&E" study for updating and revising
construction plans for the referenced project. At your request, this proposal eliminates
the traffic modeling task (former Task E) which was included in our previous proposals.
HMA proposes to provide the following professional engineering services to the Collier
County Office of Capital Projects Management:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. Typical Section
Based on plans prepared in 1992 by HMA for the four laning of
Immokalee Road from 1-75 to C.R. 951, HMA will develop new typical
sections which will incorporate curb and gutter, a five or six foot sidewalk
and an unmarked four foot bicycle lane along the south side of the
widened roadway. Specific issues relating to the new typical sections
include:
1. The impact on right of way requirements and the potential need for
temporary construction and/or slope easements.
2. The impact on current environmental and surface water ma_--,',,-.,',,,,,.,* ,.
permits. '
6292.F PRESIDENT~AL COURT FOCAT ~.~YERS. FLORIDA 33919 B41-48t.7~?4 FAX
J FEEl ! 0 1998
I_".- ......
Mr. Micah K. Massaquoi
December 30, 1997
Page 2
3. The impact on the ultimate six laning of the roadway.
4. The impact on roadway drainage facilities.
B. Existing Conditions
HMA will review the current existing conditions along the roadway for
comparison to the conditions that existed along the roadway when the
original plans were prepared in order to assess the following:
1. Requirements to update original plans.
2. Additional, relocated or discontinued accesses.
3. Additional or relocated utilities.
C. Permits
The status of currently approved environmental and surface water
management permits will be reviewed for compatibility with the
requirements of the updated project.
D. Design Hour Volume Projections
Historical volume data and recent tuming movement count data will be
used to project future road sy,~tem loadings in the vicinity of the project.
Turning movement volume counts will be obtained at C.R. 951. Design
hour volumes will be developed for the intersections to be designed,
reflecting a.m. and p.m. peak conditions. The Naples Area Transportation
Study (NATS) model will be utilized, along with the latest growth
projections by traffic analysis zone (TAZ).
Peak hour turning movement volumes will be adjusted to the 30"' highest
hour utilizing FDOT Weekly Adjustment Factors. Existing peak hour
turning movement volumes will b.e adjusted to reflect antlcipsted volumes
at the time the high school opens. _
Trip generation for the proposed high school will be developed using the
rates and equations contained in Trip Generation, 6"' Edition, 1997 for
land use 530: High School. Distribution and assignment of high school
traffic will be developed based on areawide development patterns. High
school traffic will be added to background traffic volumes to develop future
total traffic volumes. The main high school driveway will be evaluated
dur. ing the p.m. peak hour of the generator. Through volumes on
lmmokalee Road during this hour will be developed by either reviewing
data collected at the intersection of Immokalee Road and the elementary
school driveway or by reviewing hourly volume data provided bythe 1~
County.
Mr. M~can I~,. Massaquo~
December 30, 1997
Page 3
E. (Not Used)
F. Access Management Plan
An access management plan will be prepared based on the design traffic,
field reconnaissance, and with reference to the County's policy for access
management as documented in Resolution No. 92-442. A summary
report will be submitted justifying and specifying the locations and types of
median openings and intersections.
G, Deliverables
Conclusions and recommendations will be provided and presented in a
study report regarding the issues presented in items A through F.
Included in the study report will be a proposed scope of services and fee
to update and revise the current plans for inclusion of new requirements,
current existing conditions and current design and construction standards.
Five (5) copies of the report will be provided to the County.
2. SUBCONSULTANTS
HMA proposes to utilize the firm of Kimley-Hom & Associates, Inc. as our traffic
consultant to perform the services outlined in Tasks D and F.
3. INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED
The County will provide or make available, all existing data pertinent to Tasks D
and F, including recent traffic count data, the latest growth rate data and NATS
model input, the estimated enrollments of the schools within the corridor
and the magnitude of short term development projects expected within the
corridor.
4. ADDITIONAL SERVICES _
Services not specifically included herein will be performed on a time and material
basis in accordance with the rate schedule attached to this proposal. Additional
services will be performed only as requested and euthodzed by the County.
When such additional services can be identified in advance, HMA will provide an
estimated fee and obtain written authorization from the County.
5. SCHEDULE
HMA proposes to complete the services described in Section 1 within 60
calendar days of receipt of a written notico to proceed.
Mr. Micah K. Massaquoi
December 30, 1997
Page 4
6. FEES AND COMPENSATION
HMA proposes to complete the services described in Section 1 for a lump sum
fee in the amount of $35,900.00. Invoices will be submitted at each month end
in an amount proportional to the percentage of actual work completed during the
respective billing period.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal and we look forward to working
with you on this project.
Very truly yours,
HOLE, MONTES & AS/~OC. IAT~, I~C.
WFG/bc
A~achment ·
cc: R. Murray
D. Hadley
R. Alderman
~.~ma_frn~wpH 98g\89099\WFG~MKM712301.doc
HOLE, MONTES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consultant's Employee Hourly Rate Schedule
Engineer V (Principal) $130.00 Per Hour
Engineer V $110.00 Per Hour
Engineer IV ' $ 95.00 Per Hour
Engineer Ill $ 75.00 Per Hour
Engineer II $ 65.00 Per Hour
Engineer I ' $ 55.00 Per Hour
Engineer Tech V $ 65.00 Per Hour
Engmesr Tech IV $ 60.00 Per Hour
Engineer Tech III $ 55.00 Per Hour
Engineer Tech II $ 50.00 Per Hour
Engineer Tech I $ 40.00 Per Hour
Contractor Administrator (P.E.) $ 80.00 Per Hour
Contractor Administrator $ 60.00 Per Hour
Constructio~ Field Representative IV $ 60.00 Per Hour
Construction Field Representative III $ 55.00 Per Hour
Construction Field Representative II $ 45.00 Per Hour
Construction Field Representative I $ 35.00 Per Hour
Planner IV $ 95.00 Per Hour
Planner I11 ' $ 70.00 Per Hour
Planner I1 $ 60.00 Per Hour
Planner I $ 45.00 Per Hour
Surveyor V $ 90.00 Per Hour
Surveyor IV $ 70.00 Per Hour
Surveyor III $ 55.00 Per Hour
Survey Tech IV $ 55.00 Per Hour
Survey Tech Ill $ 50.00 Per Hour
Survey Tech II $ 45.00 Per Hour
Survey Tech I $ 40.00 Per Hour
2 Man Survey Crew $ 85.00 Per Hour
3 Man Survey Crew · .. $ 98.00 Per Hour
Tec, hnician IV (Clerical) $ 45.00 Per Hour
Technician III (Clerical) $ 40.00 Per Hour
Technician II (Clerical) $ 35.00 Per Hour
Technician I (Clerical) $ 30.00 Per Hour
Subconsultants/Subcontractors Cost + 15%
Reimbursable Expenses Cost + 15%
Mileage $ .30 Per Mile
Concrete Monuments $ 10.00 Each
Permanent Reference Monuments $ 10.00 Each
W:\1989~S909CJ~HMAFE E S C HEO.doc
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
AWARD A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR THE SOUTH NAPLES COMMUNITY PARK RFP 97-2745 - PROJECT
#80037.
.OBJECTIVE: That thc Collier County Board of Commissioners approve the
Selection Committee recommendation of the Professional Engineering firm and the
subsequent agreement negotiation for the South Naples Community Park.
CONSIDERATION: The South Naples Community Park project was approved and
prioritized by Board action on April 22, 1997 under Agenda Item 8(C)(2) for a
facility to provide baseball, basketball, soccer and other recreational facilities
including a tot lot to this arcs of Collier County.
The Parks & Recreation Depar. tment Master Plan is to be implemented by the
professional engineering firm selected in accordance with the authorization by the
County Administrator .
The Selection Committee received proposals from eight (8) firms and short listed
three firms for interviews:
1. Wilson Miller Barton & Peek, Inc.
2. Hole Montes and Associates, Inc.
3. Post Buckley Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.
The Selection Committee interviewed the firms and Wilson Miller Barton & Peek,
Inc. was selected for negotiation of an agreement to provide Professional
Engineering Services. The Agreement is provided for acceptance by the Board and
execution by the Board Chairman.
The recommended Agreement is based upon the budget proposal in the April 22,
1997 BCC Agenda Item 8(C)(2) for $2.,736,000. It is recommended that this budget
be expanded to provide the soccer field, a pathway connection to Naples Manor, and
additional landscaping that results in a project budget of $3,135,110. These project
budgets include professional engineering fees that are $185,200 for the base
proposal and f;198,100 for the expanded project. 'The engineering fees were
negotiated to less than seven percent of the construction estimate. Attached is Table
lA, Conceptual Opinion of Probable Costs for the base project, and Tables 2A and
Table 3, Conceptual Opinion of Probable Costs for the base plus expanded project.
Professional Fees are listed in Table lB, Basic Services, and Table 2B, Additional
Services.
FISCAL IMPACT: Current funding for this project is broken up between fund
(306) Parks User Fees and fund (368) Parks Impact Fees in the amount of
$2,735~600. The additional $399,510 that is being re'quested will be transferred by
a budget amendment from 368 Reserves into the project as follows:
From:Fund (368) Parks Impact Fees
Cost Center (919010) Reserves
Object Code (993000) Reserve on Capital Outlay
To: Fund (368) Parks Impact Fees
Cost Center (156416) Dist. 6 South Naples
Project (80037) South Naples Park
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The South Naples Community Park project
is compatible with the County Comprehensive Plan under the Recreation and Open
Space Element.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the
selection by the Selection Committee and the Agreement 97-2745 resulting from
negotiations with the first ranked firm Wilson Miller Barton & Peek, Inc.
That the Board of County Commissioners previously approved Phase One project
for the South Naples County Park (April 22, 8(C)2) with a budget of $2,736,000 be
to $3,135,000 to provide for additional park facilities and an Access path
expanded
to Naples Manor.
Approve the attaohed necessary budget amendment.
PREPARED BY: ~ 2~~ DATE:
Thomas A. Donegan, Pr~ect Manager
Office of Capital Projects Management
REVIEWED BY: ~. __ _-,- : ~_ DATE:
Maria Ramsey, Direc~r
Parks and Recreatioff Department
Pu~hasingDd~artment
Ad~lfo A". G~nzal~, P~, Director
agement
REVIEWED BY DATE: /
Ed Ilschn~r
Public Works Administrator
'Engineering Se~-~ces
5 Points
Expertise of Designated
Staff
Previous Performance
on Similar Jobs
Office Location and
Responsiveness
5 Points
~ility tc'~cmplete
on time
~ility to complete
within budqet
__3 Points
TOT~
_SECOND FIRM
Selection Committea Member,s Signature
RFP %97-2745
'Engineering Services for Implmmentation of Master Plan for South
Naples Community Park'
Approach
5Points
Expertise of Designated
Staff
Previous Performance
on Similar Jobs
office Location and .......
Responsiveness
5 Points
Ability tc ccmptete
on time
,3 Points
Ability to complete
within budget
3 points
TOTAL
RANKING
FIRST FIRM
SECOND FIRM
THIRD FIRM
SeleCtion Committee Member's Signature
] FEB
l~.
RFP #97-2745
"Engineering Services for Implementation of Master Plan for South
Naples Community Parku
Approach
Expertise of Designated
5 PoiDt~
Previous Performance
on Similar Jobs
Office Location and
Responsiveness
Ability tc complete
on time
Ability to comple:e
within budqet
TOTAL
RANKING
FIRST FIRM
Selection ~mitt~~er's Signature
RFP 997-2745
"Engineering Services for Im91emen=a~ion of Master Plan for Sou~h
Naples Community Park"
~ I I
Approach
Exger:ise o~ Designated
Staff
Previous For formance
cn Similar J°bs
_~ ~o~n~ ~ ,
Office Location and
Respcnsiveness
.. 5 Points
~ility tc complete
on time
~iliuy to complete
3 Points
TOT~
,.,
SECOND, ,FIP~M
Selecuion Committee Member's Signature
RFP #97-2745
"Engineering Services for Implementation of Master Plan for South
Naples Community Park"
Approach
Expe~t~ise of Designated ....
Staff
Previous Performance
on Similar Jobs ~ ~
Office Location an~
Responsiveness ~ 4
~ility tc c:mp!ete
on time
~ P~int S, ,, ,
~iii2y to complete
within budget ¢ ~ ¢ ~ ~
3 Points ~
~ECO~ F:mq~
RFP 997-2745
,,Engineering Services for implementation of Master Plan for South
Naples Community Park"
Approach
Expertise cf Designated
Staff
Previou~ Ferformance
on Similar Jobs
q ¢c~ng~ ......
O~Sce L~car~n and
5 Points
~iiity tc complete
on time
~i!i~y to complete
within budget
17
~IRST Fi~
RFP #97-2745
"Engineering Services for Implementation of Master Plan for South
Naples) Community Park/
Approach
Expertise cf Designated
Staff ·
Previous Performance
on Similar Jobs
__4 Points
Office Loca[ion and
Responsiveness .,
~i!ity tc c~r,p!ete
on time
~iti~y to complete
within budget
TOT~
~ING
Selec~ Co~~ee'Me~er's Signature
RFP #97-2745
,,Engineering Services for Implementa~ion of Master Plan for South
Community Park"
Naples
Approach
5 Points
Expertise cf Designated
Staff
Previous .~erformance
on Similar Jobs
Office Location and
Kesponsiveness
~i!i~y tc complete
on time
~ility to complete
within budQet
3 Points
-- TOT~
~ING
FIRST FIRM
THIRD FIR~
Select~ommittee Member's Signature
,
FiB I 0 1998
m. II
RFP #97-2745
"Engineering Service~ for Implementation of Master Plan for South
Naples Community Park"
Approach
Expertise of Designated
Staff
q 3,q 3,s 3
_. 5 Poings
Previous Performan'ce
cn Similar Jobs
3 3 3, t 3 ~
4 Points
Office Lccasion and
Responsiveness
~ili~y ~c complete
on time
,3 PoiBrs
~ility to complete
within budget ~ 2 ~ ~ ~
. , 3.,Points
TOT~
~ING
FIRST FI~ ~ ~ ~
SECO~ FI~ ¢ ~ 3 ~
Sele~ion Committee Meter's
~ Signature
RFP 997-2745
"Engineering Services for Implementation of Master Plan for South
Naples Community Park"
Approach
Expertise of Designated
Staff
Previous Performance
on Similar Jobs
4 PoiDts
Office Location and
Responsiveness
5 Points
~ility to complete
on time
~ility to complete
within budget
3,,.,.PoiDt s
TOT~
~ING
FIRST FIRM
SECOND FIRM
THIRD FIRM
Selection Committee Member's Signature
FEB I 0 1998
" .o~
FEB 1 0 1998
Page 34
Schedule B - Attachment A
Table lA
Conceptual Opinion of Probable Costs
Cost
(in dollars)
Sit~.Related Elements .....
Ea'-'---'~hwork ......... $ 364,000
Drainage $ 156,000 ,
Pavement' $ 152,000
Turn. Lane/Modifications_t.? Existing Entrance $ 157,000
Potable Water Distribution & Wastewater Collection $ 147,000
Landscaping*' $ 100,000
Irrigation Distribution System $ 197,000
Site Lighting $ 66,000
6' Asphalt Pedestrian Pathway"* $ 25,000
Subtotal Site-Related Elements $1,364,000
FacilitY-Related Elements
Lighted Basketball Fields (2) $ 406,000
Lighted.Basketball Court $ 38,000
~ll Site Amenities and Play Structures $ 115,000
"' Concession with Restrooms S 210,000
Restroom StruCture with Vending Machines $ 38,000
Picnic Area Shelters (2) $ 32,000
Subtotal Facility-Related Elements S 839,000
Subtotal (Site-& FacilitY.Related Elements) $2,203,000
Professional Service Fees $ 185,200
Permit Application Fees $ 10,000
OCPM Fee $ 79,000
Additional ProfeSsional Service Fees
Surveying $ 8,700
Geotechnical $ 4,800
Reimbursables $ 2,500
Subtotal $2,493,500
10% Contingency $ 242,420
Total $2,735,920
* Includes minimum sidewalk to service facilities.
i~** La~'~dscaping meets only Collier County Code minimum requirements along wit , ~.prl
and mulch in open space areas. ~o. *~,.?~"'~ -
*'* Total cost for Pedestrian Pathways = $50,000. Costs to be matched by grant.
FEB 1 0 1998
PG._ [,~.
TABLE 2A Page 35
ADDITIONAL PHASE ONE PARK AMENITIES
~ted Elements_ ' in dollars)
Facility-Related Elements --
Lighted Soccer Field --
Soccer Field (Not Lighted) ------ $125,000
$ 65,000
Subtotal Facility-Related Elements $190,000
Subtotal (Site-& Facility-Related Eleme'"~ts) $353,000
Professional Service Fees $ 12,900
Subtotal
$365,900
10% Continge~ncy
$ 36,590
Total
$402,490
Total cost for 8' path to Naples Manor =$50,000. Costs to be matched by grant.
Page
SCHEDLE B - ATTACHMENT A
TABLE 3
O Conceptual Opinion of Probable Costs
Cost
;Site.Related Elements .,,
Earthwork ,. $ 3'~i,000
~ Draina~]e .... $ 156,000
Pavement'
$ 152,000
Turn Lane/Mc, dification~'to E:~'i'sting Entrance $ 157,000
Potable Water Distribution _~, Wastewater Collection' System $ 147,000
Landscaping" $ 238,000
Irrigation Distribution System "' $ 197,000
L. Site Lighting "' $ 66,000
_ 6'Asphalt Pedes'tdan Pathway*-- $ 25,000
.... 8' Asphalt .Access path to, Naples Manor *"'"' $ 25,000
Subtota! Site-Related Elements $1,524,000
Facility-Related Elements
Lighted Baseball Fields (2) $ 408,000
Lighted Basketball Court $ 38,000
Site Amenities and Play Structures $ 115,000
~. Concession with Restro°ms $ 210,000
= Restroom Structure with Vending Machines $ 38,000
Picnic Area Shelters.. (2) $ 32,000
Lighted'~occer Field $ 125,000
.. Soccer Field (Not Lighted) $ 65,000
Subtotal Facility-Related Eiem,~'ntS $1,029,000
Subtotal (Site-& Facility. Related Elements) $2,553,000
_.. Professional Service Fees $ 198,100
Perm"J't Application Fees $ 10,000
OCPM Fee .. $ 73,000
Additiona'l Professional ServiCe Fees
Surveying $ 8,700
Geotechnical $ 4,800
-- Reimbursables $ 2,500
Subtotal
$2,850,100
i0% Contingency $ 285,010
Total
- . $3,135,110
Landscaping includes entry treatments, shade and character plantings in park use
open space areas, and sodding in open space areas.
'*.' Total cost for Pedstrian Pathways = $50,000, Costs to be matched by grant. FF'B
.... Total cost for 8' path to Naples M, anor = $50,000. Cnsts to be matched by grant. 1'6.,
SCHEDULE B - ATTACHMENT A page
SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR BASIC SERVICES
Table '1 B
Professional Service Fees
Planning &
SCOPE OF SERVICES Civil Architect Landscape Electrical TOTAl
Master Plan Refinement $ 5,000 $ 4,700 $ 4,400 $ 500 $ 14,600
~'reliminary Design $10,600 $ 7,800 $ 7,500 $ 3,700 $ 29,600
Final Design, Construction.
· Documents & Permitting $~'7,200 $14,500 $15,200 $11,200 $ 98,100
Bidding Assistance $ 2,000 $ 1,500 $ 1,000 $ 500 $ 5,000
Cons.!ruction Phase Services $ 8,000 $ 4,100 $ 2,200 $ 900 $ 15,200
Observation of Construction $12,000 $ 6,000 $ 3,300 $ 1,400 $ 22,700
SUbtotal , $94,800' $38,600 $33,600 $18,200 $185,200
Table 2B
Additional Professional Service Fees
The following are the additional Professional Service Fees for the design and permitting of one lighted sl
field, one soccer field without lights, and 8' asphalt access path to Naples Manor, and additional landscal:
The Professional Service Fees only apply if these additional services are performed concurrenlly with the b
scope of services in the contract.
Planning &
SCOPE OF SERVICES Civil Architect Landscape Electrical TOTAL
Master Plan Refinement $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Preliminary Design $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Final Design, Construction
_Documents & Permitting $ 5,000 $ 0 $1,000 $3,000 $ 9,000
Bidding Assistance $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Construction Ph~e Services $ 800 $ 0 $ 460 $ 300 $1,560
Observation of Construction $ 1,200 $ 0 $ 840 $ 300 $ 2,340
Subtotal $ 7,000 $ 0 $ 2,300 $3,600 $12,900
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
REQUESTING DIRECTION TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE ]LEPF. AI2NG
ORDINANCE NO. 93-2 WHICH ESTABLISHED THE PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT
ADVISORY BOARD
OBJECTIVE: To diminat¢ an advisory board that is no longer necessary.
CONSIDERATIONS: The Collier County Public Health Unit (PHU) Advisory Board 'arm created by
ordinance in 1993. The Board was created prL-na61y to revie~ the budget and program uea~ being
supported by Collier County. Ini6~y there were several contract and budget issues that were I:~ing
debated including inden~6cadon o£ the County by the State Department of Health, and a detennlna6on
of v. qxlch spedfic program ~reu v'ould be supponed by the County. These issues have since been
resolved and thc clinic function of the Health Department contracted out to Collier Health Services, Inc.
leaving lirde o£substanc¢ for the advisory corru~rtee to review and report on, on
resvlt, the committee beg~ having di£ficulty generating a quorum, and then in fdling vacancies. Recendy
the committee derided to go to quarterly meetings. However, with ~ current vacancies, and two
member's terms expi~ng, the Chair of the adx~sory committee suggested that a recommendation be made
to the County Commission that the corem;tree be extinguished. Ali sit~g members were catled to
determine if there would be any strong opposi6on to this recornmenda6on, and none was received. Both
o£ thc currcm members whose tetras were up for renewal have indicated that they ~ouJd likely not have
rta?p~
The comar6tree served a valuable purpose during its existence, providing assistance to both the
Commission and to the staffs o£ the PHU and the County. The members of the committee are to be
commended £ot their time and the vaJuable input that v/as provided making thc Department of Public
HeaJth a better org'a~za6on. In addi6on to direc6on for a repealing orcLinance, it is also requested that
the Cha~rma. n be authoz~zed to execute cer6~cates o£ apprecia6on for the members o£ the Publ~c Health
Unit Advisory Board £or their dedicated service.
Because the committee was crtated by ordma.nce, ~othcr orc~nance v411 bc required in order to repeal.
GRO~X'TIt MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None, as there is no health rdated element o£ the growth
manag~,m~nt plan.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is a nominaJ cost for the ac6on being requested in the staff time to wzite the
ordinance and adver6se For its adop6on. The costs associated with the committee itsel£ ~il be saved in
the way o£postage and staff 6me needed to prepare back up rnate6al and attend mee6ngs. These costs
are es6mated to be roughly $2,000 atmualiy.
RECOMME~ATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM"MISSIONERS~ direct staff to
prepart and adver~s¢ an ordinance repealing Orclinance 93-2, and authorize the Chairman to execute
cer6~cates oF apprecia6on for thc members o£ the Coll~er Count). Publ;c Health Unit Advisory Boar~ for
their much appreciated t/me and effort.
Prepared ~ '
by:.
s Administrator
C-hades Ko~be~, M.~ Collier Count), Public Health Director
F£B
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DIRE~ STAFF TO DRAFT AN AMENDED ORDINANCE RELATING TO
BEACH AND WATER AND VESSEL CONTROL.
OBJECTIVE: To draft more specific ordinance language to address certain beach vendor
application situations that were unanticipated when the ordinance was originally written.
CONSIDERATIONS: Ordinance 89-I l as amended provides regulations for use and conduct on
the beach, vessel regulation, concession operations, equipment rentals and conduct of vendors on
the beach and adjoining v, aters. Under the existing ordinance, a beach vendor applicant must haw
'd~e permission of thc beach front property owner (typically a hotel) in order to receive a ix'trait. A
rw..ent ca.sc, however, pointed out several we. a3messes hq the ordinance language when a hotel that
owned a narrow beach ac.,ccss easement granted permission for a vendor to apply for a permit.
permit w'as granted as it technically mci th~ requirements of thc ordinance. In addition, the
ordinance does not require that a vendor keep his activities within the boundaries of the sponsoring
property owner, which in this case allowed the be. ach vendor to spill over onto property in front of
neighboring condominiums. This situation was not contemplated under the original ordinance and
is ,~ot consistent wi~ its intent but does meet thc current specific language o£today's law.
There axe also questions that are raised regarding the right of be. ach vendors to conduct their
busincss on State lands. The State land, due to beach rcnourishmcnt efforts, has grown
considerably in size, and thc State's position on commercial activities on the public portion of land
has yet to be firmly determined.
Finally, thc ordinance needs to be revised to match other park ordinances adopted bi,' the County
Commission for enforcement consistency. Ail of these proposals were discussed with th~ Parks
and Recreation Advisor)' Board who have recommended that the Count). Commission giv~ its
direction in support of these arncndmenLs.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the actions requested other than the
stafftimc necessary to xmtc thc amendments and the advertising cost once thc ordinance is brought
back for considcra6on.
GROWTH MANAGMENT IMPACT: None.
Recommendation thst the Board of Collier County Commissioners, direct the Parks and
Recreation staff and the County Attorney's Office to draft .amendments to Ordinance 89-11 as
provided for above.
Prepared by: Jghn Dunnuck. O~ralions Coordinator Date: 2/'2/98
Reviewed and
Approved by: Maria Ram~:y, Parks and Recreation Director Date:
Reviewed and
Approved by:-
Thomas W. 'Ol~iff, Pt~/~3.~ces Administrator
Date ?d2/9g
FEB
ORDINANCE NO. 97- ~2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.
89-11, AS AM'ENDED, "THE BE'ACH AND WATER
SAFETY AND VESSEL CONTROL ORDINANCE"
BY AMENDING SECTION SIX, VESSEL
REGULATION, TO INCREASE THE AREA OF
SPEED RESTRICTION ON JET SKIS FROM 500
FEET OFFSHORE TO 7S0 FEET OFFSHOILE;
ALSO AMENDING SECTION SEVEN:
REGULATION OF CONCESSION OPERATIONS,
EQUIPM[ENT ILENTALS AND VENDORS ON T1TE
BEACH AND ADJOINING WATERS, TO ADD
ADDITIONAL:REGULATIONS 1ZEGARDING ALL
VESSELS PROPELLED BY MOTORS RATED AT
TEN HORSEPO",VER OR GREATER; PROVIDING
FOR INCLUSION INTO THE CODE OF LAWS
AND ORDINANCES; PROV'rDING FOR
CONFLICT AND SEVERABILIT~'; AND
PROV'ID/NG AN EFFECT/VE DATE.
~,V1TEILEAS, Collier County Ordinance No. $9-1 I,. as amended, regulates
the operation of jet skis within a distance of .500 feet from the Collier County
beaches and shoreline bathing areas and specifies requirements for rental of jet
skis in those areas; and :
'~V'ITER. EAS, recent irresponsible and sometimes dangerous operation of
privately owned jet skis and, in some instances, rental j~t skis, 'at a distance orS00
feet from the beaches and shoreline bathing areas have become an unacceptable
and recurring nuisance to bathers and landowners in those areas; and,
x, VlqrF. la, EAS, it is now apparent that operation of jet skis within 500 feet of
the shoreline is too close to the shoreline to abate the nuisance aspects of the
irresponsible operation of jet skis; and
X, VHEILEAS, there are unacceptable and unavoidable enforcement problems
regarding enforcement of ordinance prohibitions against individual operators of
private jet skis; and
',VHEREAS, it is necessary to abate the nuisance of irrespon~"n~'~"~"operation
of private and rental jet skis in the vicini~, of the Collier County shoreline, that the
current restriction line of 500 feet horn the shoreline must be moved seaward to
the distance of 750 feet of the shoreline; and
'~VFIEREAS, notwithstanding the good faith efforts of most renters of jet
skis to eliminate irresponsible operation of rental jet skis by their custo~er$,~i~j,~t.J~,~l ..~ ]
necessary to abate the nuisance of irresponsible operation of some rental jet
that the current beach vendor perrnittee regulations applicable to Om individual
operators of rental jet skis be amended to 'include additional age and safety
regulations; and
WHEREAS, personal watercrait, by virtue of their size, speed,
maneuverability, noise type and level, and their increasing numbers, present
special problems affecting other boaters, bathers, and the general public health,
safety and welfare, which special problems have been recognized tel:early by the
Florida Legislature as evidenced by recent amendments to Chapter 327, Florida
Statutes, imposing additional regulations affecting personal watercraft.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOA. RD OF
COUNTY COM'SYISSIONEILS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
SECTION ONE: AbfENDM'ENTS TO SECTION.SIX OF COLLIER
COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 89-I1, .i,S AMENDED.
Section Six of Collier County Ordinance No. 89-1 I, as amended, is hereby
amended to read as follows:'
SECTION SIX: VESSEL REGULATION ..
A. Operation of vessel in excess of idle speed prohibited.
1. The operation of any vessel, or Sailcrafi, in excess of idle
speed, as defined herein, in or on all waters of the Gulf of
Mexico within five hundred feet (500 feet) offshore fi.om all
sandy beaches and shorefi'ont bathing areas is hereby
prohibited. Said prohibition shall be effective and enforceable
regardless of whether or not such area is designated by
appropriate sign, buoy or other public notice.
2. Jet ski regulation. No person shall operate a jet ski:
a. closer than 5OO 750 feet perpendicular fi.om the water's
edge except to go to and fi.om the shore or except in a
vessel corridor designated under subsection (3) hereof,
nor shall proceed to ox from that portion of the Gulf
beyond 500 feet at a speed greater than merely necessary
to effectively traverse thc breaking water,
distances from 500 feet to 750 feet from the shore, st any
safe speed under the then existine_ conditions, but not tn
exceed 20 miles per hour_, or [ s~,.~,.
2 FEB
%Vords underlined are added: wnrd,~ ~b-~h~,~h ~ d~.t,~o~ L__
~ b. in an unsafe, reckless or careless manner endangering the
life, limb, or property of any person.
3. Vessel corridors. The following areas of the Gulf adjacent to
the beach closer than -500 ~50 feet from the shore may be
designated as being exclusively for vessel use between dawn
and dusk daily:
a. Those areas of Tigertail, Vanderbilt Beach and Clam
Pass County Parks and such other parl~ and areas
designated and posted by the County Parks and
Recreation Depmhnent as vessel corridors Sr use areas.
4. Beach la.unch of vessels regulated. No person except a law
enforcement officer, licensed beach vendor: authorized
emergency personnel, or other person actually engaged in a
rescue attempt shall traverse the beach with a motorized boat or
jet ski ~ or launch such vessel fi-om the beach from an
unauthorfzed launching erea. A licensc, d beach vendoC~
location is an authorized launch site for that vendor'.~
equ{pment,
Water Siding. No person(s) including the sider(s) (anyone
being towed on a line behind a vessel) and the vessel
operator(s) shall water ski closer than .500 feet fi-om the edge of
the beach .directly on the Gulf.
6. Sailcraft, including sailboats, windsurfboatds, and sailboards.
No person shall operate a sailcTaft closer than $00 feet
pcrpendicula.r from the water's edge where bathers are present
except to go to and from the shore by the most direct means
possible in a safe and reasonable manner.
7. Regulated areas. No person shall operate a motorized vessel or
sailcratt within an area which has been clearly marked by
buoys or some other distinguishing device for bathing,
swimming or which has been otherwise restricted by the
County, provided that this subsection shall not apply in the
case oran emergency or to a patrol or rescue craft.
B. Vessel speed not to exceed reasonable speed under existing
conditions. Nothing contained in this Ordinance shall be construed to
authorize or approve the speed of any vessel or sailcrafl in excess of
that which is reasonable and proper under the existing conditions or
circumstances including, but not limited to, the presence of water
skiers, bathers, fishermen, natural hazards or other water tr~ffict .....
~ord$ .nde~lln~$ ~re ~ddcd; wo~d~ ~l~k-lhp~h Are deleled. 1~ ~, ~
C. Exemptions. The following shall be exempted from the provisions ot
Section Six of this Ordinance.
1. The provisions of this Ordinance shall not be construed to
prohibit the operation, racing or exhibition of vessels or
sailcraft during a publicly announced, properly authorized,
supervised and adequately patrolled regatta, speed trial or
exhibition.
2. The opera{ors of Law Enforcement or rescue vessels or vessels
operating under emergency conditions shall be e.xempted while
conducting official duties or operating under emergency
conditions.
-. :
3. Commercial fishing vessels are exempted while conducting
fish netting operations, provided the operatio.ns n.re conducted
in a safe and prudent manner and in accordance with Section
Six '(B), Vessel speed not to exceed reasonable speed under
existing conditions. Under no cite,instances, however, shall
commercial fishing vessels be operated at greater than idle
speed within five hundred feet (.500 feel) ofbathers.
SECTION "I%VO: AMENDMENTS TO SECTION SEVEN OF COLLIER
COUNTY OILDINA.NCE NO. $9-11, tS AMENDED.
Section Seven of Collier County Ordinance No. 89-11, as amended, is
:
hereby amended to read as follows: ,
SECTION SEVEN: REGULATION OF CONCESSION OPERATIONS)
EQUIPMENT RENTALS AND VENDORS ON ~
BEACH AND ADJOINING WATERS
The safety and welfare of the persons that reside nearby the County's beach
areas and of the public that recreate on the beach and adjoining waters makes
necessary and v. ppropriate the following regulations:
A. Beach Vendor Permit Requirement. Any person engaged in the
rental, leasing, bailment for consideration, or otherwise providing
transportation for remuneration, of motorized or wind. driven
vessel(s) for use by the public on the beach or adjoining waters of
Collier County, including jet skis and sa~lcraft, shall be required to
obtain a "Beach Vendor Permit" fi.om the County. A Beach Vendor
Permit shall issue and be maintained upon the applicant paying such
,s
F£8 1 0 ~8
Words underlined are added; words ~ ~ del~. ~ ~
~,pplication fee therefor as established by the County' by resoluton
and meeting the following requirements:
I. The applicant must have an operations office or headquarters
located at a land-based location with direct access to the be. ach
in the immediate area where the vessels are being provided for
public use.
2. The applicant must have and maintain a telephone or marine
r~dio at its land-based operations office.
3. The applicant must have a motorized chas~ boat with
operational marine radio in good running condition that meets
all U.S. Coast Guard sai'e~ requirements kept at vessel rental
site during all hours of applicant's rental operations.
4. The applicant must have and maintain comprehensive general
liability insurance with coverage not less than the amount of
$$00,000.00 combined Single Limits.
5. The applicant shall provide a list describing and indicating thc
Florida vessel registration number of each motorized vessel
applicant shall place in service. Any rhotorized vessel placed
in service for public use after a .Beach Vendor's Permit has
been issued shall have a Florida vessel registration number
affixed thereon.
6. The applicant shall provide proof of having minimally one
operational life vest for each occupant space on each of the
vessels to be offered for public use under Section Seven of this
Ordinance.
The applicant is required to obtain a County occupational license for its
operations office required under Section Seven of this Ordinance. ['~'o obtain
occupational license, the applicant must provide proof of having a current, valid
Beach Vendor's Permit~_..]
B. Beach Vendor Permittee/Vessel User Regulations/Cie,ut, al
1. OperAtor Age Restrictions Applicable to Operation of All
Vessels With 10 Horsepower or Greater. As required by
fiLtbseC,.tion 327.395. Florida Statutes_ until October I. 2001_. thc
rental to or operation of a motorized vessel cubjeot--le-the
-...,,:'.,,.,.. ..,-,s.: .... """ nowered by a motor of
horsepower or _creater is prohibited to anyone under 15 1,':::': cf
age bom after September 30. 1980. and on or after October I,
2001. a person 21 years of age or younger, unless that person
has in his/her possession aboard the vessel nhotot~ranhlc
" identification and a boater safety identification' cal'd ittt~,O,,zP2's,_
Words underlined ate added; word! s#-~g~-lh~,~l~h nrc deleted.
pursuant to subsection 327.395. Florida Srat,t~._ or ~ such
........ ~. ...... l ~ is at lea~t 16 years of
~ Child': ~ pa~ or a n :d';lt
....... eS~ O~ ~e or
~cr who is either exempt ~m ~c rcqui~en~ of ~bsecfion
~7.395, Flo~da Stamt~. or has n ~lid ~at~ safe~
identi~ca~on card issued pu~ant to that
~ompanie~ that pesos during ope~fion of the vessel and
~?~_me5_all reaponslbili~ for each ope~tion ~la6~n that may
occur during that operadon of that vessel. It shall ~ a
~olation of this sec~on for ~y pesos ~o ~n~ 1~,
othe~se.'pro~de for money or ~
~ a motorized vehiclc to ~yone except as pro~dad
herein.
2. ~c renter, user, passenger of or on any vessel des~b~d in
Sec~on Seven shall have on board ~ operational lira v~st
while using or ha~ng such vessel in the water, and it is a
violation of this Ordinanc~ for any such person(s) using
vessel not to have a life vest on board.
3. Pre. Ride Safew Instructions. Each livery_ must also provide
pre-ride boater safety_ instruction and safe _ty i~formation to each
person w.ho rents a vessel powered by a motor rated at I0
horsepower or ~catr, r.,
4. Display of Rental Jet Ski Speed Limi{ Information. Each rental
jet ski must conspicuously display the special speed limit
instructions that apply within all the respective distances from
the shore. The speed instructions must be easily visible to the
operator of the rental jet ski when the operator is in the
operating position on the jet ski.
5._ Mufflers on Rental .let Skis. Each rental jet ski must always
operate with stock mufflers or with mufflers that are quieter
than stock mufflers.
6. Each renter of a jet ski must read and initial that he/she
understands the speed and operation restrictions placed upon
operation of jet skis by this Section and/or by Chapter 327,
7. Rental .let Ski Identification Markings. Each/ental jet ski mu~t
display identi .fyin? letters and/or numbcr~ tha~ identify_ the
specific jet ski. Each 'identification number and/or letter,
trademark, logo_, and/or company name mu~t be at least four (4]
i~hes' in height and must contrast v~th its back.mind color ~n
as to be easily visible at a distance of 250 feet by a ne~on with
Use nfVessel Cnrr~dors by Rental ]'et ~qki.~. E~ch r~t~l ~et ~ "
must us~ n vat,el co~dor whenewr ~ co~dor i~ a~il~hle~'
Maximum allowable ~eed in thc co~dor ~thln 500 fcc, of
the ~horc is the slowest ~pccd at which the op~tor
effectively consol the jet s~i and be able to ~nsv~e th~
brea~ng water: and at all distances from 500 tegt to 750 feet
~m the shore, operate at any safe ~eed. but not to
~en~ (20~ miles per hour,
ga~e Ope~on of let gkis. All jet ski~ mu~t be opec,ed
reasonable and p~dent manner at ~11 time~_ 'M~n~v~ which
~cluding wea~ng through eon~e~ted ve~el ~ffie.
· e'wake of another vessel unreasonably or unneces~a~lv
to such vesse] or when ~sibili~ around such ~ssel
obs~cted, or the vessel i~ op~ted in a mann~ that
~onal swe~ng at the last moment to avoid eo11~slon.
~s~te reckle~~ted to ves~eI~
· at have one (1) or ~o (2) occupant~,
SECTION THREE: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY
In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any of'her ordinance of Collier
County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall app!y. If any phrase or
portion of the Ordinance:is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent .jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a set~arate, distinct and
independent provision and such holding shall not.' affect the validity of the
remaining portion.
SECTION FOUR: INCLUSION INTO THE CODE OF LAWS AND
ORDINANCES
The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a pan of the
Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Flor/da. The sections of the
Ordinance may be rcnumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word
"ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropr/ate word.
..
SECTION FIVE: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of
State.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Conu'nissio~
of Collier County, Florida, this I lth day of l~,bruar? , '
1997. ·
ATTEST: :-.." BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
D.~. OH~ ftriOCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
· ".; ','~' .:" i. .,'.. "/'"', '"
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Thomas C. Palmer
Assistant County A:tomey
h:~'gi ns ncc,~.97~ t Uk tofl:l.lcp
Words undr. rJincd nrc added: ~vords a1~lo~hr..,,.h .~-. d,-l~...d
IMM
for
tnt.
mt~
Agefl(
NO..
uses any LLrc~t~t or ~! Lu or ~ ~ ~.
~' . i,w~trLl Aver, too ~r,r&~,on un~r ~ ~02 of
.... ~~ ~c. I~ ~ ~ ~~ for ~ ~ ~
. B, FI~. I~ ~11 ~ ~~ for ~ ~r~ ~ ~
.~ ~ ~h ~ V~bin 1~000 f~C f~ 8~ZO tO ~tlO~ly
~.. for m~ ~ ~ f~sh ~ ~ M~ ~Y ~ ~
,. ~ ~ a d~ty or ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t of ~ AOe~
~f~r or ~ty ~~ ~ print fio~ ~ to wa~ of ~
~' ~~ of .~,~ ~ ~ ~f of ~=. FEB 1
~.~.? Pg
,. ,. ~ ~ ~.-
ah~Ll be ~~1 ~r ~ pera~ to thr~ axrf ball,
,~.~_ ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ a ~
' (1) ~ ~ ~ ~ 150 f~ ~
~'"" (2) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~LNIy
(1) ~ ~ r~t, ~t, ~ ~, or
f~~ ~ ~ ~
~1 ~ ~~t, ~ ~ SOO
"~ ~'l ~.
." ~ ~ ~ ~i~s for ~ or
pr~ of ~ ~ or c~actir /nCe~
or ~t~on on ~ ~,
"~ (2) ~ 1l~ ~ii/GLrtl. K
sale or rental of ~ MFC~I,
~ ~ ~ A~~ ~ mt 25 fNt f~
~ f~t (S00 fNt) off.~ f~ a11 ~
~ enfor~le r~lese o~ ~e~r or not such
area %l bai~ ~ a~roprlato sl~, k~ or "
~r ~lAc ~tAce.
m~s Aoer
: ' NO.,
? m ~~ ~ FE8 1 0
ama
FEB 1 0
~ ~ators o~ ~ ~for~n~ or
~ ~~. u~r ~.c~r~~,.
~ f~ (500 f~) of ~*
~Jo~ ~m of ~ ~, ~=l~ Jet ~s ~
~-~-~s.b ~ b*~ P~t~ for
~~?,!~< ~s of a~ltc~t'm rental opritto~
"" '"' '~'"' t3
· .. ,. / $
: (4) Th4 a;~:ll~nt ss~tt harm a__~_ matntaLu c~pro~e~Ave
for ~c ~ ~r a ~ V~r's ~t ~
t..
~ ~ ~ ~ v~ v/ohtu ~ p~isL~ of ~s
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT PROPOSALS
RECEIVED UNDER RFP #97-2760
OBO'ECTIVE: To obtain Board approval to reject the proposals received
in response to RFP #97-2760, "Department of Revenue Integrated Software
Sys'tem".
CONSIDET~TIQNS: The Board has appropriated funds in the current
budget to modernize the existing technology utilized for the collection of
utilities billings ,and special assessments. Accordingly, a Request-for-
Proposals was developed and notices thereof,~ssued to 78 firms on
November 19, 1997 for this purpose. On January 16, 1998, proposals were
received from two firms; Dynasty Software Inc. and TreSun respectively.
proposals were by Committee. Neither were
Both
reviewed
the
Selection
deemed to be fully responsive to the published requirements of the RFP.
Given the limited response to the solicitation and the lack of responsiveness
to the County's requirements as published, staff recommends that the Board
reject the proposals received and authorize staffto re-solicit proposals. In
the interests of attracting more respondents, the RFP language will be
amended to encourage vendors to respond to separate components of the
complete package rather than the entire system should they so desire.
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: N/A
FEB 1 0 1~8
~P~.. /
RECOMMI~NDAT!O~I: That the Board of County Commissioners reject
the proposals received under RFP 97-2760 and authorize staffto re-solicit
the project.
Joh~Y~nkosk~ ~~ '
ReYetnue Services Director
W]lii~m Co lek~J~5.~--/ - "
Information Technology Director
REVIEWED BY:. ~.:' :'. ? ,,/, C4'~..~, ~,'? Date:
Steve' Camell,
Purchasing/General Services Director
REVIEWED BY: ,~'~.~_ Date:
~° °°~,.-/X '
FEB I 0 1998
APPROVAL OF BUDGET A~{ENDM~NTS
BCC A~enda of 2/10/98
Museum CIP Fund (.~)14)
Budget Amendment 9,~.130
~useam. Lecture Hall Proi¢ct
Lecture Hall Project (00 i(X}) ($10,000)
Museu.~ of the Everalad~s. Pro_iect 33770
Museum of the Everglades $10,000
Total 0
Ftu~ds are r~c-ded to enable completion of the Musctun of the Everglades Project (33770). The project budget is
currently insufficient because the act'un) archittcturnl expenses are higher th~ the two-),ear old origaMI estimate~.
AG" DA E
FEB ! 0 1998
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE
FEBRUARY 10, 199g
FOR BOARD ACTION_:
1. MISff. ELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED:
2. Districts:
A. Collier Soil & Water Conservation District - minutes and agenda of December 17,
1997.
AGENDA Z.,TEH -
FEB 10