The URL can be used to link to this page

HEX Agenda 07/27/2017 AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY, JULY 27, 2017 IN CONFERENCE ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING & REGULATION BUILDING, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED T O ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. PETITION NO. CUE-PL20170000680 – North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District requests a two year extension pursuant to Land Development Code Section 10.08.00.G.3 to commence construction for the Conditional Use approved by Resolution No. 08-50 and to amend the conditional use master site plan to shift the improvements along the eastern boundary to the west by 50’, for a fire station and administration building on property located on the east side of DeSoto Boulevard North, opposite and north of 22nd Avenue NE, in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner] B. PETITION DR-PL20160001991 – Petitioner, Naples South Realty Associates, LLC, requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.F and seeks three deviations relating to landscape buffer and masonry wall standards under Sections 4.06.02 and 5.05.05 of the Land Development Code, for a proposed Wawa facility with fuel pumps redevelopment project, located on the north side of U.S. 41, just east of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, in Section 19, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 8.73± acres. [Coordinator: Fred Reischl, Principal Planner] C. PETITION NO. ASW-PL20170000082 – Naples South Realty Associates, LLC requests a waiver from the minimum required separation of 500 feet between facilities with fuel pumps pursuant to Section 5.05.05.B of the Land Development Code, for property located on the north side of U.S. 41, just east of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, in Section 19, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Fred Reischl, Principal Planner] D. PETITION NO. ZLTR(CUD)-PL20170000993 – Frangie, LLC requests affirmation of a zoning verification letter issued by the Planning and Zoning Division pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06, in which County staff determined that the proposed use of private investigator (SIC 7381) is comparable in nature to other permitted principal uses in Tract “F” under Section 5.3 A. of the Founders Plaza PUD, Ordinance No. 02-68, as amended. The subject property is located on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway, approximately one third mile east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 13.33± acres. [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager] E. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20170000444 – Lords Way 30, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2014-11, as amended, the Lord’s Way 30 Acre RPUD, to add one deviation relating to parking, to modify one existing deviation relating to fences, walls and landscape buffers, to reduce the minimum side yard setbacks and distance between structures for single-family, single- family attached, and two-family and single-family zero lot line principal structures, and to modify Exhibit C-2, Typical Lot Layout. The subject property is located on the south side of The Lord’s Way, approximately one-quarter mile east of Collier Boulevard, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of ±30 acres. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner] F. PETITION NO. ZLTR(CUD)-PL20170000096 – Angel’s Medical Company requests affirmation of a zoning verification letter issued by the Planning and Zoning Division pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06, in which County staff determined that the proposed use of adult daycare (SIC 8322) is comparable in nature to other permitted principal uses i n Tracts “C,” “D,” and “E” under Section 4.3 A. of the Founders Plaza PUD, Ordinance No. 02-68, as amended. The subject property is located on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway, approximately one third mile east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 13.33± acres. [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager] 4. OTHER BUSINESS 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN AGENDA ITEM 3-A Cor County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION, GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING: JULY 27, 2017 SUBJECT: CUE-PL20170000680, NORTH COLLIER FIRE & RESCUE # 14 PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: North Naples Fire Control & Rescue District 6495 Taylor Road Naples, FL 34109 REOUESTED ACTION: Agent: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Vice President, Planning Services Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider an application for a two-year extension pursuant to Land Development Code Section 10.08.00.G.3 to commence construction for the Conditional Use (CU) approved by Resolution No. 08-50 and to amend the conditional use master site plan to shift the improvements along the eastern boundary to the west by 50', for a fire station and administration building on property. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject parcel is located on the east side of DeSoto Boulevard North, opposite and north of 22nd Avenue NE, in Section 28, Township 48 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on thefollowingpage.) CUE-PL2017000680 Page 1 of 7 North Collier Fire & Rescue # 14 July 11, 2017 22nd AVE NE o,. PROJECT LOCATION Location Map Petition Number: PL2017000680 Zoning Map 0 116 % f 0 O sere LOCATION `a % W II6 A A1N!:: 0 [u % 114 e % a 113 . 3a 0 na n m J % e % uo Petition Number: PL2017000680 Zoning Map N I' (, Ij I I Ijl I II j 1 I �® j l PROTECTED AREA PRESERRYETIBouNDARr ZONING E- (Estates) TANK @ PUMPHOUSE - 0.020 - 0.31 \� I - 13.07 (HESS R/W) GRAVEL LOT - 0.0/4 6 WALL D ET s RIP To BE (.—T 'CU i EO CATEO i0 CWN1Y 0 1�5 30 PRESERVE 9GNµ OR F NRE R W 5'LB.E SC E FEET a [a wnnwMexTA cwwLT.x 1TLB.E TYPE 'B I TYPE ,B, SE r - 3p - N99'4050"W 95394' - - - CONCRETE/SIDEWALR - 0.092 = 1.42 (LESS R/W) WATERMANAGEMENT (FRONT) - o.SM - &41 WATER MANAGEMENT (REAR) - 0.093 PFESER'h lK RAR, BA LN • - £R d j - - 31.48 RIPRAP BUFFER - 0.062 - 1.27 DESOTO R/W = 0.806 PROPOSED PRESERVE i.es ACRES PRI AND CONSEA—EN BTW O'Lp.E. � LL . . I - 17.23 (LESS R/W) TOTAL GROSS AREA - 6.486• EASEMENT DNE .—MATION N ENE- TOTAL NET LOT AREA - 5.273 (LESS R/W) NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT STATION #14 ,. N - AS / a Bar APP- PP-a/ I -11-\s 7F E,:—(Eskatesl m17 _ZONING RON?SERAtl+ �� Hca�' a — ----- .\ _ — SDN P` I t `aim I Ya $ - \ F , PROPOSED PRESERVE LINE OsI �j vi �o I S - \ , � ; � I .ate � \ - - - w 1/(A.=.—) ,F teu \ I � w u..) / — — — — — — � x RIPR,w eANx -' STRUCTURAL 1, lllj III- I l PROPOSED N £ DNPE aNu PIM o/ jw T - I<IwT I - -----— — — — mCi - - 10B.EIF \, �samN I . 4¢ D m� — ___ seewmE as23aT __— g r --- --- -- a 60' NIDE PUBUC R.O.W. _ _ • _.. —_ evwuvn �� I s„rnxa Rn �,Wc Rn. wrnxa Rn. Ens,Nc Rn. R— I SWAtE TTI I p I TYPICAL) P�WAfNT (TYPICAL) SWA'wIEWAY I�LgT ZONING E - (Estates) i -E- ZONING DISTRICT PER LDC -E- ZONING STANDARDS FRONT SETBACK - DESOTO 75' - 22nd AYE 37.5' SIDE SETBACK - 30' MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT - 30' LAND USE SUMMARY ACRES PERCENTAGE WILDING AREA - 0.405 - 6.26 TANK @ PUMPHOUSE - 0.020 - 0.31 PAVEMENT - 0.845 - 13.07 (HESS R/W) GRAVEL LOT - 0.0/4 - 0.68 CONCRETE/SIDEWALR - 0.092 = 1.42 (LESS R/W) WATERMANAGEMENT (FRONT) - o.SM - &41 WATER MANAGEMENT (REAR) - 0.093 - 1.k PRESERVE - 2034 - 31.48 RIPRAP BUFFER - 0.062 - 1.27 DESOTO R/W = 0.806 - 9.37 22nd AVENUE R/W - 0.587 -9.08 LANDSCAPE -1 OPEN -1.114 - 17.23 (LESS R/W) TOTAL GROSS AREA - 6.486• - 100% TOTAL NET LOT AREA - 5.273 (LESS R/W) NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT STATION #14 REWIRED: 15% OF NATIVE VEGETATION 6.466 AC - 0.567 - 0.605 - S27 15% . 5.27 = 0.79 AC PROVIDED: WETLAND PRESERVE - 1.82 AC UPLAND PRESERVE - 0.21 AC OPEN SPACE REQUIRED 30% OPEN SPACE - 5.273 X 30% = 1.56 ACRES PROVIDED 73.3x OPEN SPACE: - 3.867 AC / 5.273 AC (—AMT UCO X - n 3�LA. qq <U b RY R 88888 Aw ¢ ,A HOLE MONTES DEFERS IRmuts9RNw THE MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT PER THE LDC DEFINITION IS 30, MEASURED FROM 11RST RNISHED FLOOR THE MAXIMUM ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT PER DETINIMON IS 351, MEASURED FR011 AVERAGE CENTER ELEVATION OF ADJACENT ROADWAY (DESOTO BLVD) 950 Encore We Naples, FL. 34110 Phone, (239)254-2000 Flonda orlificate of Authonza0 No, 1772 PARKING: USE REQUIRED PROVIDED REA: ADMINISTRATIVE AN- 7.21 7,215 SF / 200 = 36.1 SPACES 37 SPACES SHIFT: iARBEST 2 EMPLOYEES X 2 24.0 SPACES 24 SPACES TOTAL = 60.1 SPACES 61 SPACES OE9DTO &SE.w min nlNr Hi1rNT- X - n 3�LA. qq <U b RY R 88888 Aw ¢ ,A HOLE MONTES DEFERS IRmuts9RNw THE MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT PER THE LDC DEFINITION IS 30, MEASURED FROM 11RST RNISHED FLOOR THE MAXIMUM ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT PER DETINIMON IS 351, MEASURED FR011 AVERAGE CENTER ELEVATION OF ADJACENT ROADWAY (DESOTO BLVD) 950 Encore We Naples, FL. 34110 Phone, (239)254-2000 Flonda orlificate of Authonza0 No, 1772 PARKING: USE REQUIRED PROVIDED REA: ADMINISTRATIVE AN- 7.21 7,215 SF / 200 = 36.1 SPACES 37 SPACES SHIFT: iARBEST 2 EMPLOYEES X 2 24.0 SPACES 24 SPACES TOTAL = 60.1 SPACES 61 SPACES WIRD-] UOADNC RE., NOTES: 1, THE STORM BY TIEMNORTI I -ER FIRE CONTROL 0 RESCUE DISTRICT. CONSTRUCTION2. - E III -B 3. UMTYPE OF STORIES - ONE . TOTAL SOUARE FEET UNDER ROOF - 17.625 OCCUPANCY/USE - PUBLIC/FRE STATION - 6 SPRINKIET - YES 7, CONTOUR ELEVATIONS ARE "AVS' s.F. GROUP 'B CONDITIONAL USE MASTER SITE PLAN LEGEND 2dIZ%3 PROPOSED PAVEMENT PROPOSED WETLAND PRESERVE PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED UPLAND BUFFER ENGINEER: W. TERRY COLE. P E. LICENSE N.. —47 6092SP01A 4507-1 2006.092 1 OF 2 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The North Collier Fire and Rescue District # 14 Conditional Use was originally approved on February 26, 2008. (See Exhibit A: Resolution Number 08-50.) The project received extension approvals pursuant to State of Florida Senate Bill 1752 and Executive Order Number 11-128 providing a new expiration date of January 19, 2014. Subsequent to those actions, the Board of Collier County Commissioners adopted Ordinance Number 12-38 that changed conditional approvals from three years to five years, thus adding an additional two years (the three year calculation was already included) to this project. Using the allowances of Executive Orders Numbers 12-140, 12-192,12-199, 12-217 and 12-240 regarding Tropical Storm Debby and Tropical Storm Issac, an expiration date of June 16, 2017 was approved for this project. (See Exhibit B: Extension Letter, dated January 9, 2013.) The project recently received another extension related to the Zika Virus, Hurricane Matthew and the Wildfires using the allowances of Executive Order Numbers 16-230, EO 16-274, EO 17-16, EO 17-67, EO 16-193, EO 16- 233, EO 16-288, EO 17-43, EO 17-115, EO 17-115, EO 17-166 EO 17-120, and 17-174 further extending the expiration date pursuant to Land Development Code Section 10.08.00.G.3 from June 16, 2017 to December 19, 2019. (See Exhibit C: Extension Letter, dated June 30, 2017.) The Conditional Use Master Site Plan has been updated to shift the improvements along the eastern boundary to the west by 50'and is in compliance with the LDC. (See Master Plan on previous page.) The purpose of the subject Conditional Use petition for the North Collier Fire and Rescue District # 14 is to extend the expiration date for a period of two years from December 19, 2019 to December 19, 2021. In addition, the conditional use master site plan is being amended to shift the improvements along the eastern boundary to the west by 50 feet. CUE-PL2017000680 Page 4 of 7 North Collier Fire & Rescue # 14 July 11, 2017 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): Staff originally concluded in 2007 that the proposed use may be deemed consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP), subject to the requirement to comply with Policy 5.1.1. of the GGAMP. The particular criteria in GGAMP Policy 5.1.1. had not been translated as an LDC requirement. Thus, staff included in Resolution 08-50 the following condition of approval number 2 which will be carried over to the current Resolution/HEX Decision: 2. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. a. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a 'cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. CUE-PL2017000680 Page 5 of 7 North Collier Fire & Rescue # 14 July 11, 2017 b. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. Transportation Element (TE): The subject Conditional Use Extension does not change the previous transportation analysis. The previous Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) indicated that the adjacent roadway network had sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 -year planning period at that time. Staff has reviewed the current 2016 AUIR and has found that the adjacent roadway network continues to have sufficient capacity and Level of Service (LOS) to accommodate this project. Staff further notes that the project's development must also comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations and operational improvements when development approvals are sought at time of Site Development Plan (SDP) review, which will require an updated TIS. Therefore, the subject application can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). ANALYSIS: This extension does not change the previously approved CU analysis. The subject CU extension remains consistent with the GMP and the LDC. Ingress and egress to the subject property remains the same as what was previously approved. The effect the Conditional Use has on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor is minimal and has not changed. The preserve area remains unchanged. Thus, the subject CU remains compatible with adjacent properties. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): NIM's are not required under the procedural manual of the Administrative Code Chapter C.3 which outlines the requirements for Conditional Use Extension petitions. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office reviewed the staff report on July 10, 2017 for CUE- PL20170000680, North Collier Fire and Rescue District # 14. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) approve Petition CUE- PL20170000680, North Collier Fire and Rescue District # 14, subject to the new Master Site Plan and previously approved conditions contained in Resolution Number 08-50. Attachments: Exhibit A: Resolution Number 08-50 Exhibit B: Extension Letter, dated January 9, 2013 Exhibit C: Extension Letter, dated June 30, 2017 CUE-PL2017000680 Page 6 of 7 North Collier Fire & Rescue # 14 July 11, 2017 PREPARED BY: TNANCY L , , DA PRINCIP L R ZONING ISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: 17 RA . BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONB G DNISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION CUE-PL2017000680 Page 7 017 North Collier Fire 8 Rescue # 14 June 30, 2017 RESOLUTION N0, 09- 50 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IN THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 2.01.03.G.1,e., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DESOTO BOULEVARD NORTH, OPPOSITE AND NORTH OF 22 AVENUE NE, IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the .power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use for a fire station and administration building in the Estates (E) Zoning District, pursuant to Land Development Code Section 2.01.03.0.I.e. on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 10.08.00.1) of the Land Development Code, as amended; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that; Petition CU -2007 -AR -11977, filed by Robert L. Duane, AICP of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, an Independent Special District and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Page 1 of 2 Attachment A The South 180 feet of Tract 115, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and The North 150 feet of Tract 115, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.01.03.G.1.e of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates (E) Zoning District, for a fire station and administration building in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan found in Exhibit `B" and subject to the conditions found in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super -majority vote, this!(/)day of B,,sbwdyy�2008. ATTEST: DWIGHT- . Q4,CLERK •. . +. l' rte: •'' `•i ..•••''�;i*utyClerk Att,d - *mWJ.6 i ina� I s i pnatur�• til j . Apv s form an a e9'� Je A. C1 zkow Chic ;is County Attorney BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: --� —y'," - RM NN ,Chairman Exhibits (attached): A. Findings of Fact B. Conceptual Site Plan, entitled, "Big Corkscrew Island & Rescue District #14," dated 1/07, which is prepared by Hole Montes, Inc. C. Conditions Page 2 of 2 I � I I Ei ra lMxe AEO ! I I N V ZONING DISTRICT ACRES PD+ LOC RuaoRa •E• 2dONC STAIEAR09 - 02oz • PROM? S mmx -OESM 79 SOC SETSNX � 21M PAYEIDNE - 4C30 - mm -mmL- • WARD NONCE 01 WILL •RASETAWA suNE SE SIO -00 •NOWNr RWATl4l AOWx • MNNLi >Yt N11 m TOM 0' vOeAMP/IIIP N'R wE ciaWm 2s a ROR-s-NAr A ]i/ AVOAE ML A I lam 01445 AATM - oA®• - TOOT TOTAL LEE UR ARM •5.071 DENS R/W) BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT #14 PRESERVE REQUR@ t5X OF NAME VEETAUW L485 AC - LM - 0.207 . 3,0 M. 0.07 - LLS AC PROVIDED: SERANO PRESOM - Lm AC U L M0 PRM . 421 AC OPEN SPACE REQUM - 305 OPEN SPACES . SA+ M 30W - Ln ACRO PROVIDED . 76% CM SPAM . 41S4 AC / 0.01 AC T—w xwmu ROAOM7 P30M BLVD) 950 PAFL 3 n110 NOPL pkP. Ito Phar: M02542000 HOLE IAONTES Fh" Cn01ar W 1100054U7EWSREW AWMInAm NP.tM EXHIBIT B PARKING: USE REOUIRED PROVIDED AOYMSTRA7RE AREM "m F / x00 - SLO SPACES 37 SPACES LARESf SNfT. 12 DAPLOYEES x 2 - 24.0 SPACES 24 SPACES TOTAL . SLO SPACES a S►ANFS NE,~ ALWAOD.] INPMPm. 1010M0 ACLIAm - 1 PAOYOU - 1 nORH L TIO: STOW SAM RAMASDWIT SYSIEI O 70 SE ,TAPSO R WR NIU COOMON OLANO TMIE CLRAO. COMM 2. TWE T CMSMICOCII - T1PE S-COS/fn70 NOW 1 NI11-RI Oi 51tlK3 - YK 4. TOTAL SOLI x LET UAEI TOT - DASD S! S OCOIPANCTAIC - PINUC/70W STANCH - O—P l• L SPAAIAIID - NO % W or^— ATE •Ia1C CONDITIONAL USE MASTER SITE PLAN LEGEND PROPOSED PAVEMENT ACRES PERCENTAGE RuaoRa - 4405 - 02oz TANG A PiRWPInEft - aas - 47E PAYEIDNE - 4C30 - mm GRAVEL LO% - ISO"- - � 471x - 40+R C01NtlE,E/SOEWNR WATER MANAQ0ENT (P WN): - n7N SAO . WATER MAMAEIENf WA* - 0770 - LOSS PRESERM - LOU . 2R.14R EAST aRTEk - 0310 RWRAP K"m -nam CESOTO R/a - 0107 22W AYENIE N/+0 • 450 OBS LANDSCAPE! - LW - 1L4os lam 01445 AATM - oA®• - TOOT TOTAL LEE UR ARM •5.071 DENS R/W) BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT #14 PRESERVE REQUR@ t5X OF NAME VEETAUW L485 AC - LM - 0.207 . 3,0 M. 0.07 - LLS AC PROVIDED: SERANO PRESOM - Lm AC U L M0 PRM . 421 AC OPEN SPACE REQUM - 305 OPEN SPACES . SA+ M 30W - Ln ACRO PROVIDED . 76% CM SPAM . 41S4 AC / 0.01 AC T—w xwmu ROAOM7 P30M BLVD) 950 PAFL 3 n110 NOPL pkP. Ito Phar: M02542000 HOLE IAONTES Fh" Cn01ar W 1100054U7EWSREW AWMInAm NP.tM EXHIBIT B PARKING: USE REOUIRED PROVIDED AOYMSTRA7RE AREM "m F / x00 - SLO SPACES 37 SPACES LARESf SNfT. 12 DAPLOYEES x 2 - 24.0 SPACES 24 SPACES TOTAL . SLO SPACES a S►ANFS NE,~ ALWAOD.] INPMPm. 1010M0 ACLIAm - 1 PAOYOU - 1 nORH L TIO: STOW SAM RAMASDWIT SYSIEI O 70 SE ,TAPSO R WR NIU COOMON OLANO TMIE CLRAO. COMM 2. TWE T CMSMICOCII - T1PE S-COS/fn70 NOW 1 NI11-RI Oi 51tlK3 - YK 4. TOTAL SOLI x LET UAEI TOT - DASD S! S OCOIPANCTAIC - PINUC/70W STANCH - O—P l• L SPAAIAIID - NO % W or^— ATE •Ia1C CONDITIONAL USE MASTER SITE PLAN LEGEND PROPOSED PAVEMENT 3 PROPOSED WETLAND PRESERVE PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED UPLAND BUFFER EIImR00 .EMIT 4 WiL rx LICENSE N SHWO 6092SP01 4507-1 2006.092 1 w 2 3 CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOR CU -2007 -.AR -11977 1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Master Site Plan, identified as "Conditional Use Master Site Plan," prepared by Hole Montes, Inc., dated January, 2007. The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for conditional use approval. The final design must be in compliance with all applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations. The Department of Zoning and Land Development Review Director may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by this conditional use, so long as these minor changes remain consistent with all applicable development standards. 2. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use approval, or major changes to the approved plan, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Chapter 10.02.03, Site Development Plan (SDP) review and approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended. 3. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged. a. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. b. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. 4. Along Desoto Boulevard and 22"d Avenue N.E., 30 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated to Collier County, at no cost, in exchange for relieving the Big Corkscrew Fire District of turn lane requirements along Desoto Boulevard and 22"d Avenue N.E. EXHIBIT C G: Current/ Gundlach/ Conditional Uses/ Big Corkscrew Fire Admin. Bldg. /Exhibit C Conditions 2-26-08 iof 4C0� T¢ County Growth Management Division Planning & Regulation Land Development Services January 9, 2013 Mr. George Hermanson P.E. HoleMontes 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 PL 20170000680 REV 1 RE: Confirmation of Extension pursuant to Executive Orders Numbers 12-140,12-192,12-199,12- 217 and 12-240 regarding Tropical Storm Debby and Tropical Storm Isaac for Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue Station #14, EXT -2012 -AR -14984 Dear Mr. Hermanson: In your application received on December 18, 2012, you requested an extension of this Conditional Use project pursuant to the provisions noted above. This project received previous extension approvals pursuant to State of Florida Senate Bill 1752 and Executive Order No. 11-128 providing a new expiration date of January 19, 2014. Subsequent to those actions, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance #12-38 that changed conditional approvals from three years to five years, thus adding an additional two years (the three year calculation was already included) to this project. Using the allowances of Executive Orders Numbers 12-140, 12-192, 12-199, 12-217 and 12-240 regarding Tropical Storm Debby and Tropical Storm Isaac, a new expiration date of June 16, 2017 is hereby approved for this project. - Please be advised that the information presented in this verification letter is based on the Laws of Florida, the Collier County Land Development Code and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendmant(s) to my of these documents could affect the validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited to, concurrency related to the provision of adequate public facilities, environmental impact, and other requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code or related ordinances. Should you require further information please do not hesitate to call me at (239) 252-2931. Sincerely, Researched and prepared by: Reviewed by: KK4elem, AICP, Principal Planner r. n . Bellows, Zoning Manager Depa eut of Planning & Zoning Department of Planning & Zoning cc: Peggy Jarrell, Addressing Section - Claudine Auclaiq Business Center Paula Fleishman, Coacmraney Land Devetgms lSw Attachment B w, w.cnlliergov.net Petition Name: Big Corkscrew is Fire Control CU Petition # EXT -2012 -AR -14984 Approved in Resolution #08-50 on 2/26/08 For 3 years = 2/26/11. DEBBY: Extension per SB 1752 (2 years) = 2/26/13 Extension/Tolling per Executive Order #1128 (327 days = 1/19/14 EO 12-140; EO 12-1.92; EO 12-217 1/19/14 + 91 days tolled 4/20/14 Starting date ending date of tolling + 6 months extension = 10/20/14 [6/25/12 to 9/24/12] ending date per TS Debbie ISAAC: EO -12-199; EO 12-240 10/20/14 + 88 days tolled = 1116/15 Starting date [9/25/12 to 11/21/12] ending date + 6 months extension = 7/16/15 ending date TS Isaac If both Isaac and Debby are used to get extensions, subtract days that the tolling overlays Subtract 30 days - 30 days [8/25/12 to 9/24/12] PLUS 2 years for ordinance #12-38 that Establishes a 5 year expiration for Conditional Use approvals = 6/16/15 ENDING DATE = 6/16/17 FINAL ENDING DATE C0�76Y COxnty Growth Management Department June 30, 2017 Mr. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Vice President, Planning Services Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 RE: Confirmation of expiration/sunset date of North Collier Fire and Rescue District # 14 (FKA Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District # 14) pursuant to Section 252.363 F.S. and Governor Scott's 1017 declaration of emergencies regarding Hurricane Matthew, Zika Virus, and Wildfires, PL2017000068 Dear Mr. Mulhere: In your application received on March 22, 2017, you requested an extension of this Conditional Use (CU) which expires on June 16, 2017 pursuant to Section 252.263.F.S. This letter confirms that the new expiration date of the CU is December 19, 2019. The expiration date is calculated as per the attached Worksheet. Please note that you may be eligible for additional tolling days if emergencies such as Zika Virus are extended by the Govenor beyond the current expiration dates. Please be advised that the information presented in this verification letter is based on the Laws of Florida, the Collier County Land Development Code and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendment(s) to any of these documents could affect the validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited to, concurrency related to the provision of adequate public facilities, environmental impact, and other requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code or related ordinances. Should you require further information please do not hesitate to call me at (239) 252-2484. Sincerely, Researched and prepared by: Nancy Gm ac l , ICP, Principal Planner Zoning S es cc: Ian Barnwell, DRI/PUD monitoring Claudine Auclair, Business Center Armis Moxim, Addressing Section Reviewed by: Raym nd V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Services Heidi Ashton Cicko, Asst. County Attorney Paula Fleishman, Concurrency Attachment C Page 1 of I WORKSHEET FOR HURRICANE MATTHEW, ZIKA VIRUS, & WILDFIRES North Naples Fire Control and Rescue Station #14 Conditional Use — Current Expiration Date 6/16/2017 MATTHEW: E016-230; E016-274; EO 17-16; EO 17-67 (10/03/2016 — 5/23/2017) 6/16/2017 Plus 232 days tolled = 2/3/2018 Starting Date Ending date of Tolling Plus 6 month extension = 8/3/2018 Ending date of Tolling + 6 month extension ********************************************************************************************************************** ZIKA: E016-149 (Collier County identified in Section 1); 16-193; 16-233; 16-288; 17-43; 17-115; 17-166 (6/23/2016 - 8/7/2017) 8/3/2018 Plus 410 days tolled = 9/17/2019 Starting Date Ending date of Tolling Plus 6 month extension = 3/17/2020 Ending date of Tolling + 6 month extension ********************************************************************************************************************* WILDFIRE: E017-120; 17-174 (4/11/2017 — 8/8/2017) 3/17/2020 Plus 119 days tolled = 7/14/2020 Starting Date Ending date of Tolling Plus 6 month extension = 1/14/2021 Ending date of Tolling + 6 month extension Minus days that overlap with: Matthew: 10/3/2016 - 5/23/2017 Matthew and Zika overlap is from 10/3/2016 to 5/23/2017 or 232 days Zika: 6/23/2016 — 8/7/2017 Zika and Wildfires overlap is from 4/11/2017 to 8/7/2017 or 118 days Wildfires: 4/11/2017 — 8/8/2017 Wildfire and Matthew overlap is from 4/11/2017 to 5/23/2017 or 42 days 232 days Plus 118 days Plus 42 days is 392 days 1/14/2021 Minus 392 days is 12/19/2019 FINAL ENDING DATE: 12/19/2019 *4M HOLE FA01"kITES ENGINEERS - PLANNERS . SURVEYORS 950 Encore Way • Naples; Florida 34110 � Pht�rae 23�' 254,2000 Fix' 239.2 4 " 099 February 21, 2017 T/IA HAND -DELIVERY Paula J. Brethauer, Intake Project Coordinator Collier County Government Operations & Regulatory Management 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District #14 (CU -2007 -AR -11977) (f/k/a Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District #14) Application for Conditional Use Extension HM File No.: 2006.092 Dear Ms. Brethauer: Pursuant to our discussions and meetings (most recently in July of 2016) please find attached an application and supporting information for a request for 2 -year extension for the previously • approved the conditional use for the above referenced use (Resolution 08-50). In your July 26, 2016 email, in addition to reconfirming the CU expiration date of June 16, 2017 (see attached approval and extension timeline) you indicted that, if necessary, the application requesting a further extension (of up to two years, if approved by the BCC pursuant to LDC Section 10.08.00.G.3.) should be submitted about 4 or 5 months prior to the current June 16, 2017 expiration date. The application for extension identifies the following Evaluation Criteria for consideration of the CU Extension request: A. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP). Include Information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section or portions of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Response: The CU is for a new fire and rescue station along with ancillary administrate offices and training facilities. The subject site is located on the east side of Desoto Boulevard and north side of 22nd Avenue N.E. The property is designated E — Estates in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, and is within the Residential Estates Subdistrict. The subject property is zoned E -Estates. Both the Golden Gate Area Master Plan FLUE, and the E -Estates zoning district, identify "Essential services", such as afire and rescue station, as allowable "Conditional' uses. The request was . and still is consisted with all applicable potions of the FLUE and there are no new LDC provisions that would affect that original CU approval and the conditions attached to that approval. H: 200612006092MMonditional Use 2017TB I70221 Itr tr CU Extension.doex Naples • Fort Myers Paula J. Brethauer, Intake Project Coordinator Re: North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District #14 • (f/k/a Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District #14) (CU -2007 -AR -11977) Application for Conditional Use Extension HM File No.: 2006.092 February 21, 2017 Page 2 B. Discuss whether any GMP Amendment has been adopted since the CU was approved that may affect this site. Response: There have been no GMPAmendments adopted that affect this site. C. Describe any development or redevelopment that has occurred on adjacent parcels and what affect, if any, an extension of this CU may have on those users. Response: The extension of this CU will have no negative impact on adjacent or nearby property owners; however, development of the Fire Station will have a positive impact with the closer availability of emergency services and reduced response time. D. Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request. Response: A variety of reasons, most notably the availability of necessary funding (during the economic downturn), resulted in the delay of this project. The project is • now ready to move forward and the Site Development Plan (SDP) has been submitted and is under review. A copy of the site plan is attached. There have been some site design changes since the approval of the original CU. It was determined that those changes were minor in nature and consistent with Condition I of the approved CU, could be approved by staff and do not require submission of a new or amended CU application. We enclose the following documents: ■ Five (5) copies of a cover letter explaining project and included the Evaluation Criteria; ■ One (1) fee check in the amount of $4,050; ■ One (1) copy of email from Ray Bellows dated July 26, 2016; ■ One (1) copy of letter from Ray Bellows dated January 9, 2013' ■ Five (5) copies of Completed Application; ■ One (1) copy of Completed Addressing Checklist; ■ Two (2) copies of Affidavit of Authorization (signed/notarized); ■ One (1) copy of Original Application for Public Hearing for Conditional Use; ■ One (1) copy of Resolution that approved Conditional Use; ■ Three (3) copies of Warranty Deed; ■ Five (5) copies of Site Plan (11" x 17"); ■ Three (3) copies of Boundary Survey (11" x 17"; and ■ One (1) CD of all documents in Word format and plans. • HA2006\2006092MAConditional Use 2017\PB 170221 Itr tr CU Extension.docx Paula J. Brethauer, Intake Project Coordinator • Re: North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District #14 (f/k/a Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District #14) (CU -2007 -AR -11977) Application for Conditional Use Extension HM File No.: 2006.092 February 21, 2017 Page 3 If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP Vice President, Planning Services and Business Development RJM/sek Enclosures as noted. • cc: Chief Rita Greenberg w/enclosures • HA2006\2006092MMonditional Use 2017\PB 170221 Itr tr CU Extension.docx Stephanie Karol • From: BellowsRay [RayBellows@colliergov.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 11:12 AM To: Stephanie Karol Cc: Bob Mulhere Subject: RE: Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue Station Conditional Use (AR -14984) I recommend that you submit the application at a minimum of four or five months before the expiration date. This will give staff time to get the extension scheduled for the public hearing before the CU expires. You can also submit an application now and request that the extension be applied at the end of the 6/16/2017 expiration date. Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department - Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 -----Original Message ----- From: Stephanie Karol [mailto:StephanieI<arol@hmeng.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 201610:46 AM To: BellowsRay Cc: Bob Mulhere Subject: RE: Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue Station Conditional Use (AR -14984) Thank you, Ray. The CU will expire on 6-16-2017. When would be the best time for us to submit the CU Extension Application? Thanks for your help, Stephanie Stephanie Karol Permitting Coordinator HOLE MONTES, INC. Engineers - Planners - Surveyors 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 USA Direct: (239) 254-2018 Main Line: (239) 254-2000 Facsimile: (239) 254-2099 -----Original Message ----- From: BellowsRay [mailto:RayBellows@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 4:47 PM To: Stephanie Karol Cc: Bob Mulhere • Subject: RE: Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue Station Conditional Use (AR -14984) Hi Stephanie, I checked the official zoning atlas and have confirmed that an extension pursuant to LDC section 10.08.O.O.G.3 has not been previously approved. As a result, you may apply for the additional 2 -year extension after the end of the previously approved extensions submitted pursuant to the various Senate Bills and Executive Orders as you have noted below. I have attached a copy of the application which references the submittal fees for your review. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to ask and I will be glad to assist. Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department - Planning & Regulation Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 -----Original Message ----- From: Stephanie Karol[mailto:StephanieKarol@hmeng.coMI Sent: Friday, July 22, 201612:08 PM •To: BellowsRay Cc: Bob Mulhere Subject: Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue Station Conditional Use (AR -14984) Dear Ray: Attached please find your correspondence dated 1-9-2013 regarding the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue Station #14 Conditional Use. According to this letter with your calculations of extensions under various Senate Bills and Executive Orders, the expiration date is 6-16-2017. We would like to confirm that we would be entitled to receive an additional 2 -year extension according to LDC Section 10.08.00.G? Is there a fee and/or application associated with seeking this 2 -year extension? If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us. Thank you for your assistance in this matter, Stephanie Stephanie Karol isPermitting Coordinator HOLE MONTES, INC. Engineers • Planners - Surveyors 950 Encore Way • Naples, FL 34110 USA Direct: (239) 254-2018 Main Line: (239) 254-2000 Facsimile: (239) 254-2099 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. • COAT County i COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collier2ov.net (2391252-2400 FAX: (2391252-6358 APPLICATION:FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR COIN ITIONAL USE EXTENSION LDC SeCt16n i0.08.d&& Code of Laws see#ion 2-83 2-90 Ch. 3_ C.2 0 the AdministraiyeCode PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED I_i A CONDITIONAL USE EXTENSION TO BE HEARD BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Q A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE EXTENSION TO BE HEARD BY THE OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER APPLICANT'CONTACT INFORMATION • Name of Applicant(s): North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District Station#14* Address: 6495 Taylor Road _ City. Naples State: FL ZIP: 34109 Telephone. Cell: Cell: N/A Fax: 239-597-7082 E -Mail Address: rgreenberg@northcollierfire.com 0 Name of Agent: Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Vice President, Planning Services Firm: Hole Montes, Inc. Address: 950 Encore Way Telephone: 239-254-2000 Cell: N/A E -Mail Address: bobmulhere@hmeng.com City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34110 Fax: 239-254-2099 *f/k/a Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District Station #14 BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 2/4/2015 Page 1 of 7 Co 60e7 County COLLIER COON i i GOVERNMENTi 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 ,.,..1-1 rMUnranv nat (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 L7 Name and Address % of Ownership North Collier Fire Control & Rescue District Station #14* 100% 6495 Taylor Road Naples, FL 34109 Chief Rita Greenberg rTk/a Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District Station #14 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by eacn: Name and Address % of Ownership • 14 r If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the ercenLdgc vi uiLcicaL. Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership • 2/4/2015 Page 2 of 7 • • CO Aer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the f 9. I officers, stockholders, benericianes, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or )racers, 11 a cUI PUr alwn, IJdI LI MI ZA 11J, v1 U UaL. Name and Address Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 2/4/2015 Page 3 of 7 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION C mer County • 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 VY YY YY.{rVOIG1 p.V V.....a (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PRQPERTY LOCATION ' - Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) • The applicant shall submit 2 copies of a signed and sealed boundary survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 28 -/ 48S / 28E Lot: ---"" Block: ----- Subdivision: Plat Book: ----- Page #: ----- Property I.D. Number: 40421480007 & 40421520006 Metes & Bounds Description: See Boundary Survey Size of Property: ft. X ft. = Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 6.47 Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Intersection of Desoto Boulevard and 22nd Avenue NE ADJACENT_ZONING-AND ND, USE CONDITION;i4L USE,REQUEST DETAIL Type of Conditional Use: This application is requesting a conditional use extension allowed, pursuant to LDC section 2.03.00, of the E -Estates zoning district for Fire Station #14 (type of use). 2/4/2015 Page 4 of 7 • • Zoning when CU Approved Land Use CU Approved Current Zoning Current Land Use N E -Estates Vacant E -Estates Vacant/Undeveloped S E -Estates Vacant E -Estates Vacant/Undeveloped E A -MI -1O Agriculture A-MHO-RLSAO Vacant/Undeveloped W E -Estates Single -Family Residential E -Estates Single -Family Residential CONDITION;i4L USE,REQUEST DETAIL Type of Conditional Use: This application is requesting a conditional use extension allowed, pursuant to LDC section 2.03.00, of the E -Estates zoning district for Fire Station #14 (type of use). 2/4/2015 Page 4 of 7 • • 0 • Cofteir County COLLIER COUNT`f GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliggov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 EVQiLdJATI'ON CRITERIA SEE COVER LETTER Pursuant to LDC section 10.08.00 and Chapter 3 C.2 of the Administrative Code, staff's recommendation to the reviewing body shall be based upon a finding that the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and that the specific requirements governing the individual conditional use, if any, have been met. Further, satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable. Provide a narrative statement describing this request for conditional use and a detailed response to each of the criterion listed below. Specify how and why the request is consistent with each. If space is inadequate, attach on separate page. a. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan. Include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section or portions of the future land use element. b. Discuss whether any GMP amendments have been adopted since the conditional use was approved and that may affect this site. c. Describe any development or redevelopment that has occurred on adjacent parcels and what affect, if any, an extension of this conditional use may have on those uses. d. Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No. 2/4/2015 Page 5 of 7 Co e -r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collig[gov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre-Applicatlnn Meeting grid Final:Subenittal Requirement Checklist for: Conditilonal:Use Extension , Chapter 3 C.2 of the. Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover letter briefly explaining the project 5 0 ❑ Completed Application (download from website for current form) 5 0 1 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ❑ ❑ Pre -Application Notes - Pre -Application Meeting requirement was waived by Ray Bellows 5 ❑ Q Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 0 ❑ Original Application for Public Hearing for Conditional Use 1 [K] ❑ Resolution that approved the Conditional Use 1 J ❑ Warranty Deed(s) 3 x ❑ Site Plan 24" X 36" plus (one 8 %2 X 11 copy) 5 0 ❑ Traffic Impact Study (TIS), or waiver 2 ❑ Boundary Survey 3 ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans * Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be 1 Q ❑ submitted electronically in PDF format. OTHER - Email and letter from Ray Bellows 1 x ❑ * If located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, include an additional set of each submittal requirement ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 2/4/2015 Page 6 of 7 0 • • 0 • • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2300 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6353 FEE REQUIREMENTS L3 Pre -Application Fee: $500.00 (This fee will be credited towards the application fee as long as the application is submitted within 9 months of the pre -application meeting.) N Conditional Use Extension Application Fee: $3,000.00 M Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Hearing Examiner or BZA: $500.00 ❑ Transportation Fees, if applicable: o Methodology Review Fee: $500.00 o Minor Study Review Fee: $750.00 o Major Study Review Fee: $1,500.00 9 Fire Code Review Fee: $50.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Date Robert J. Where, FAICP, VP /Agent Applicant/Owner Name (please print) 2/4/2015 Page 7 of 7 • AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS($) GUE•PL-20170000880 i, CHRISTOPHER CROSSAN (print name), as VICE CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS (title, if applicable) of BCiiNORTN COLLIER FIRE CONTROL & REBCUE DISTRICT (company, if. a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owneri.appiicant�cohtract purchaserLjand that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions In this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of Investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions Imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authoriIDEK RLANNING SERVICES to act as our/my representative In any matters regarding this petition iricluding 1 through 2 above, "Notes: if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v, pres. • ifahe appllcant:Js a. Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then. the%documents should typically be slgried'by the Company's * naging Member' • If the applicant Is a partnership, then typically a partner can: sign on behalf of the. partnership. . If the applicant Is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be Ident Ned as the "general • partner" of the named partnership. . If the applicant is a trust, then they must Include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., Individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the f S: stated in it are true. Signature Bate CHRISTOPHER CROSSAN, VICE CHAIRMAN BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 2012 The f r'going :I .strumsnt was .worn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on ,(date) by of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is per Wally own tot me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. STAMPISEAL Signature of Notary Public �yAY v4 ,;.•••.4 , MiOHEIJA N. t1UDDMTW MY COMMISSION t FF 117190 EXAIRESi August z9, 2019'. WW,ya°F 9aidoaThrueudaquobiySaYistt CP108-COA-00115\155 REV 3124114 Prepared by: • Lauren Bartley Cypress Title of Naples, Inc, 9130 Galleria Court, Suite 327 Naples, Florida 34109 File Number: 124 v^6 *** 3843863 OR: 4042 PG: 2393 IDCOUID In OFFICIAL RICORDI of COLIIII COn", FL 05/23/2006 at 03:50P1 D1IW 1. 11001, CLIIC COIL 250000.00 Alc 111 10.00 DOC 70 1150,00 Alto: 011,1111 TIT61 WLII 9130 GALLIIIA CT 1327 IAP111 FL 31109 General Warranty Deed Made this May 12, 2006 A.D. By Diana Tarpley, an unmarried woman and Michael G. Madison, an unmarried man, whose address is: 4595 Chippendale Drive, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter called the grantor, to Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Resuce District, an Independent Special District and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, whose post office address is: 132401mmokalee Road, Naples, Florida 34120, hereinafter called the grantee: (Whenever used herein the tam "grantor" and "gantee" include all the parties to thla Instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and migm ofindividuala, and tho successors and assign of corporations) Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10,00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the, grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier County, Florida, viz: The North 150 feet of Tract 115, Golden Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier t Parcel ID Number: 40421520006 • Together with all the tenements, To Have and to Hold, the sai to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5, or in anywise appertaining. And the grantor hereby covenants d grantee that the -gWto r ly seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and latvfirl authority to s onvey said land; that J5r njj r hereby fully warrants the title to said land and Will defend the same against the lawful claims o y ;h' as tsaid ]and is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2005. ?'�rE_ C i In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness Printed Name Lauren E, Bart �iM,'l�f!I.rNJ Wilacu Printed Name /ell to D State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Michael G. Madison, an unmarried man, who F -L Dt--. as identification. NOTARY PUBLIC -STATE OF FLORIDA W• Lauren E. Bards nFammission #DD454O pires: JULY 25, 2009 Bonded Thru Adendc aonding Co., Inc. DEED Individual Warranty Deed - Legal on Face Closers' Choi" c�iiQ (seal) Diana Tarpley Address: 459 hip ndale Drive, Naples, rida 34112 (Seal) Michae G. Madison Addrm: 14 Park Avenue, Marco Island, Florida 34145 12th day of May, 2006, by Diana Tarpley, an unmarried woman and Lsla- ; emomt own to me or Who has produced NdnPupae Print Name; Lauren E. Bartic / My Conuromlon Explrea: *** 3843864 OR: 4042 PG: 2394 *** General Warranty Deed Made this May 12, 2006 A.D, By John the Beast Enterprises, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose address is: 4312 Alton Road, Miami Beach, Florida 33140, hereinafter called the grantor, to Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, an Independent Special District and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, whose post office address is: 13240 lmmokalce Road, Naples, Florida 34120, hereinafter called the grantee: (Whenever used herein the term "grantor" and "grandee" include all Me parties to [Ws Instrumcnt and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns orMviduals, and the successors and assigns of corporations) Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, convoys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier County, Florida, viz: The South 180 feet of Tract 115, Golden Gate t iUt V cc rdin Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier Co d Parcel ID Number: 40421480007- -- --J Together with all the tenements, To Have and to Hold, the to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, or in anywise appertaining. And the grantor hereby covenantsJ,�eid grantee that the o� 1� ly seized or said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority los it convey said land; that Igfl r hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the la>vful claimlrq s ,s wwhomso, ver' (� aid land Is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2005. !� CIS In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: bQ, i i inAn EI)CLAZko t 1.t _L A WitneuPrinted Nama Lauren E, Bar n _ Witness Printed Name Ek L lS�6i�Iy6t_.i1,5 State of Florida County of Collier Address: (Seal) LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company By; John Azari, Managing Member Address: 4312 Alton Road, Miami neacI4 Florida 33140 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 12th day of May, 2006, by John Azari as Managing Member of John the Beast Enterprises, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, who islara pew ��U� knntti�l to mo or who has produced �L t3 L L+CYC ('F�a as identification, Y7 ARY PUBLIC -STATE OF FLORIDA Lauren E. Bartley No rr Public Lauren t=, Bartl Commission#DD454570 FNntName: Expires: JULY 25, 2009 My Comrabsien EsplreIs: ',,n. cd'1'iuu AWAtIC Bonding Co., Inc. DECD Individual Wuranty Deed • Lcgal on Face Closers' Choice • • RICORDID in 011ICIAL IICORDS Of COLL111 COHITI, IL Prepared by: 05/23/2006 at 03;50PM DWIGHT 1, B1OCI, C1,1111 Lauren Bartley cora 450000,00 Cypress Title of Naples, Ina 111 10,00 9130 Galleria Court, Suite 327 DOC DOC •,TO J150.00 Naples, Florida 34109 letn; C1PIISS ?ITR W1,13 File tJynbe:: 125 06 9130 GALLIIIA CT 1321 IAPLIS 11 34109 General Warranty Deed Made this May 12, 2006 A.D, By John the Beast Enterprises, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose address is: 4312 Alton Road, Miami Beach, Florida 33140, hereinafter called the grantor, to Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, an Independent Special District and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, whose post office address is: 13240 lmmokalce Road, Naples, Florida 34120, hereinafter called the grantee: (Whenever used herein the term "grantor" and "grandee" include all Me parties to [Ws Instrumcnt and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns orMviduals, and the successors and assigns of corporations) Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, convoys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier County, Florida, viz: The South 180 feet of Tract 115, Golden Gate t iUt V cc rdin Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier Co d Parcel ID Number: 40421480007- -- --J Together with all the tenements, To Have and to Hold, the to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, or in anywise appertaining. And the grantor hereby covenantsJ,�eid grantee that the o� 1� ly seized or said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority los it convey said land; that Igfl r hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the la>vful claimlrq s ,s wwhomso, ver' (� aid land Is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2005. !� CIS In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: bQ, i i inAn EI)CLAZko t 1.t _L A WitneuPrinted Nama Lauren E, Bar n _ Witness Printed Name Ek L lS�6i�Iy6t_.i1,5 State of Florida County of Collier Address: (Seal) LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company By; John Azari, Managing Member Address: 4312 Alton Road, Miami neacI4 Florida 33140 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 12th day of May, 2006, by John Azari as Managing Member of John the Beast Enterprises, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, who islara pew ��U� knntti�l to mo or who has produced �L t3 L L+CYC ('F�a as identification, Y7 ARY PUBLIC -STATE OF FLORIDA Lauren E. Bartley No rr Public Lauren t=, Bartl Commission#DD454570 FNntName: Expires: JULY 25, 2009 My Comrabsien EsplreIs: ',,n. cd'1'iuu AWAtIC Bonding Co., Inc. DECD Individual Wuranty Deed • Lcgal on Face Closers' Choice • • • • • Co��Y County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collieraov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING C ECKUST Please complete the following and email to GMD—Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application nieeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist foreach Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIM (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) M OTHER Conditional Use Extension LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy oflengthy description maybe attached) Section 28, Township 48S, Range 28E FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 40421480007,40421520006 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way . SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP-- orAR or PL # Resolution No. 08-50 co ,eY county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: © Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Bob Mulhere, FAICP, Vice President/Stephanie Karol, Permitting Coordinator. Phone: 239-254-2018 Email/Fax: stephaniekarol@hmeng.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name • approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 40421480007 Folio Number 40421520006 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by �- - Date: 2/ 13/2017 Updated by: Date: • RESOLUTION NO. 08.50 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A FIRE STATION AND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IN THE ESTATES (E) ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 2.01.03.G.1.e., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DESOTO BOULEVARD NORTH, OPPOSITE AND NORTH OF 22 AVENUE NE, IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67-1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the .power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance • establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use for a fire station and administration building in the Estates (E) Zoning District, pursuant to Land Development Code Section 2.01.03.G. Le. on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said, regulations and in accordance with Section 10.08.00.D of the Land Development Code, as amended; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: Petition CU -2007 -AR -11977, filed by Robert L. Duane, AICP of Hole Montes, Inc.,' representing Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control Rescue District, an Independent Special District and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Page 1 of 2 The South 180 feet of Tract 115 Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72, • according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and The North 150 feet of Tract 115, Golden Gate Estates, Unit No. 72, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida is hereby approved for a Conditional Use pursuant to Section 2.01.03.G.1.e of the Collier County Land Development Code in the Estates (E) Zoning District, for a fire station and administration building in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan found in Exhibit `B" and subject to the conditions found in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and super -majority vote, this G'&day of 2008. ATTEST: • GHT' ;.,CLERK BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA �L- + By:uw- t..-` ...t .17eputy Clerk Atti�l�• .�M 1►'ran s O NN , Chairman signaturt... onlM ry form A. Kl zkow Assis County Attorney Exhibits (attached): A. Findings of Fact B. Conceptual Site Plan, entitled, 'Big Corkscrew Island & Rescue District #14," dated 1/07, which is prepared by Hole Montes, Inc. C. Conditions is Page 2 of 2 N PRO7EC7E0 AREA PPESERVE SOIMDARY r wxL ZONING c..�-r E -,(Estates) PRESERW eE - ._... EfT IS'Lei. 65CIlE FEET s� soi¢i SI GN Mu.MK'a��a.'wivw _ m1An pnOAprA OYPAwR SOAIF. t' 3wNd9'10'SO1Y &w.94* . ®r d w J.ez".•PRC3FPOSED PRESERN� •• • . - -- I -aca>=s• :4. '•r+ �} \ EASOIpIT •[MSEA,VAnON.' yt 6 WE _ - - UK IXi • dlellq ./ �6•r APP.. iw - +� .4A, � ` .. .. .:. • - tE ,. . x rANroP iw - gg .. .. - • PPESTeK • .. , „ iv.e % �.. `W �•. . s0. (71P.1 _ IRulb rrlp.41.147F V -i - - ., -.•-•. - •-. -.:_ .... .' .. 'ZONING �•'- fEstateS) N Im 1 Pa0P0u!m I 1 Flom-\ I ; _ __ _..______-_u^"0. C --____.. ____ -_ - ___-___---___ ----------- -- • 115LB.E Qi c w Ni1PEV it,0.100 sr nRA061[U) 1 AflEA EXHIBIT B _ —.—.-- — ——.—.�.— — —.—. F.- R b n� --_ ---- ------- ----- - _ __ _..______-_u^"0. C --____.. ____ -_ - ___-___---___ ----------- -- ------- --- RG- - yy �!_�� ,� .I Irk©�� I � esz7B tr we • .�.•1 -_-_------_ ___-_�-_ _____�---_--------�- —___-_ -'---- RM Or EmC RM PflL TII9 RM __'. _rt1n3-.i.-�� 0°�"°"R R%N' EXHIBIT B _ —.—.-- — ——.—.�.— — —.—. F.- R b n� --_ ---- ------- ----- - _ __ _..______-_u^"0. C --____.. ____ -_ - ___-___---___ ----------- -- ------- --- RG- - 1Y IRC AK6s 10.6 161 YNI. PROP Sd9'60'S0'E - IOP 6 161 YIN. ' � �r we u esz7B tr we • -_-_------_ ___-_�-_ _____�---_--------�- —___-_ -'---- RM Or EmC RM PflL TII9 RM __'. _rt1n3-.i.-�� 0°�"°"R R%N' V I -.-•\ tIC I � 1 IAOP1am x' N6[ "TwAr r NOC SOGAT P� sN"'E ONIX"IYG�`/AT 22nd AVENUE NE I 1 i j I LAND USE SUMMARY ZONING E - (Estates) 60' WIDE R/W) ACRES PERCENTAGE wKw116R PARKING., - 'E• ZONING DISTRICT - PRESERVE - aA03 - 91.20- USE REQUIRED PROVIDED LEGEND EDC zwiRe STANOAflpS, 9060.T. TAM a PuuPHOLM : - aaa - anx REQUIRED: AONWISTRAUVE ARE.( ' FAQIR SETBACK - oESoro ]s' - 22nd AVE 37,5' PAVEMENT. - 0920 - tzoax 1sx Cf NAIVE YECETA7X]N °I . GRAVEL. lOL• - 0.010 . G71x &463M - O557 -0307.90.7 6.— sr / 200 - 31.5 SPA= 3] 9A= �, CM siarr: PROPOSED PAVEMENT 510E BUMN - 77 t5x COIIER - 0.059 . . 5. . SO] n 095 AC < 2 i IZ EMPL01EE5 X 2 - 21.0 SPACES 21 SPACES MAL BUM BLDG HEIGHT - 50• PROVIDED: 3 TOTAL . Sd6 TALES bl SPACES &,BXMIX LERACEMALIU wAtER Y,wALEYDIT (Rtank ' 1135( S6aS METU11° �vE - 1.0.2 At wA1FA " NT (RCARk 0.77E &MY H @ P � xe rAwwo AEaM - 3 -.MB . 3 �.., •• • • ":' PROPOSED WETLAND UPLAND - UL19 . 29tUPLAND PflF'_iYE A .031 At t6M.p ACOJ6m - 1 inOnOtn - 1 PRESERVE �J CASE DUFFM . 621E . S37x rr.. EL W • nmc MATER SVNVir£ BY VEIN. Rna1AP 011RL14 - Qoax - Lx]x OPEN SPACE ""` 0.'u a= tD+mK 1. lXC wA101 YµAO-a 70 BE PROPOSED CONCRETE •WaMWAIM %RMCE BY 57PRC OEa0T0 R/Ik - 0.307 . 120x lrsw x`T BUILDING HEIGHT: T1 MAmrWNm er txe ee caNsal[w WAND rNE . W D 22nd AVDME R/R - 0.587 - ADex REQUIRED 30% N6I EANdSCAPEI - Ltie - 22rOx SEI 9AEEt - 1�1 X ]OZ IRE EfAr 0 2EIFD BUEDaaO IIEIDR . 1.70 AOIE] m5g" z TPE CF C0f6 UCM N - ME 5-®5/EOL9 ROE' 1 "MSR a • M1mAl reovllr A¢A V Lur ATux run+¢ a 3oRt¢t PTOUO r'�"'IgyTo"FN�I�E'p MDW 1— - O"E i. NOTAL SQUARE RET UNOOf eaar . 17,60.0 5J. PROPOSED UPLAND � I}-aiux��{O{lj ¢twos MC omune 701AL GAOL^ AREA: aAaS' 1005 FRONDED 76% PER MALENY AGNµ a0E0UR N[Rx1T S omroµCY/ug - TVAICARIIE STAT011 - 0160P b' PUFFER AXO iNC [nSTNT b RC1 d• NWT MY NN 23ni AlE1AE KE. PER AGE LEON lS NM LE TMN Or 0 fAPI teTAL NET l8T ARM - 9dlt (LESS A/R) OPEN TACE . 1>51 AC / S871 AC AllERADJACENT 6. SPAwNLm - N0 SHAD AYY (OEWTO BLVD) 7. t01}Wn [tEVATws ME'NA.- ENGNM "Y G NCK P.E, UEENSE N> ]rola BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL 8L RESCUE DISTRICT #14 ;r" 6.x 950 E- TT W. Why N.p1.6. FL3t110 Ph...: MO 2542800 HOLE MONTES Fwdd.a aesd vT ODMIBFOd•9KIM AMdwra6PnNn.,m CONDITIONAL USE MASTER SITE PLAN °pC a"•aA[xar Y°K O" soszsPo, ^° A 4507-1 (• 1&Lem. ." Wrz' 07"'"x'°' rAn; ie Pa l --A �_ aAR 2OOe.092 , Br z EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOR CU -2007 -.AR -11977 1. The Conditional Use is limited to what is shown on the Master Site Plan, identified as "Conditional Use Master Site Plan," prepared by Hole Montes, Inc., dated January, 2007. The site plan noted is conceptual in nature for conditional use approval. The final design must be in compliance with all applicable federal, state and county laws and regulations. The Department of Zoning and Land Development Review Director may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by this conditional use, so long as these minor changes remain consistent with all applicable development standards. 2. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use approval, or major changes to the approved plan, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Chapter 10.02.03, Site Development Plan (SDP) review and approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04-41, as amended. 3. If a streetlight or an area light is required, it shall be of the type specified to protect neighboring properties from direct glare. Area lighting shall be shielded such that direct rays do not pass property lines. Low-pressure sodium lamps are encouraged while halogen type lights are discouraged.. a. Where required, the street lamp shall be of the high pressure sodium type and have a "cobra head with flat bottom" style or be fully shielded so that light is directed only downward. Street lamps shall be mounted on a wood pole at a height and wattage recommended by the appropriate electric utility and as appropriate for a rural area. b. Parking lot lamps shall be low-pressure sodium type lamps and shall be mounted so that they point downward without direct rays extending past the parking lot, building entrance, walkway, or other area intended to be illuminated. 4. Along Desoto Boulevard and 22nd Avenue N.E., 30 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated to Collier County, at no cost, in exchange for relieving the Big Corkscrew Fire District of turn lane requirements along Desoto Boulevard and 22nd Avenue.N.E. EXHIBIT C G: Current/ Gundlach/ Conditional Uses/ Big Corkscrew Fire Admin. Bldg. /Exhibit C Conditions 2-26-08 • • 1 r 0 Growth Management Department June 30, 2017 Mr. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, Vice President, Planning Services Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 RE: Confirmation of expiration/sunset date of North Collier Fire and Rescue District # 14 (FKA Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District # 14) pursuant to Section 252.363 F.S. and Governor Scott's 2017 declaration of emergencies regarding Hurricane Matthew, Zika Virus, and Wildfires, PL2017000068 Dear Mr. Mulhere: In your application received on March 22, 2017, you requested an extension of this Conditional Use (CU) which expires on June 16, 2017 pursuant to Section 252.263.F.S. This letter confirms that the new expiration date of the CU is December 19, 2019. The expiration date is calculated as per the attached Worksheet. Please note that you may be eligible for additional tolling days if emergencies such as Zika Virus are extended by the Govenor beyond the current expiration dates. Please be advised that the information presented in this verification letter is based on the Laws of Florida, the Collier County Land Development Code and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendment(s) to any of these documents could affect the validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited to, concurrency related to the provision of adequate public facilities, environmental impact, and other requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code or related ordinances. Should you require further information please do not hesitate to call me at (239) 252-2484. Sincerely, Researched and prepared by: YIJAAa, aCft� �� Nancy Guacl , ICP, Principal Planner Zoning Se es • cc: Ian Barnwell, DRI/PUD monitoring Claudine Auclair, Business Center Annis Moxim, Addressing Section Reviewed by: 41 Raymgnd V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Services Heidi Ashton Cicko, Asst. County Attorney Paula Fleishman, Concurrency Page 1 of 1 • WORKSHEET FOR HURRICANE MATTHEW ZIKA VIRUS & WILDFIRES North Naples Fire Control and Rescue Station #14 Conditional Use — Current Expiration Date 6/16/2017 MATTHEW: E016-230; E016-274; EO 17-16; EO 17-67 (10/03/2016 —5/23/2017) 6/16/2017 Plus 232 days tolled = 2/3/2018 Starting Date Ending date of Tolling Plus 6 month extension = 8/3/2018 Ending date of Tolling + 6 month extension ZIKA: E016-149 (Collier County identified in Section 1); 16-193; 16-233; 16-288; 17-43; 17-115; 17-166 (6/23/2016 - 8/7/2017) 8/3/2018 Plus 410 days tolled = 9/17/2019 Starting Date Ending date of Tolling Plus 6 month extension = 3/17/2020 Ending date of Tolling + 6 month extension WILDFIRE: E017-120; 17-174 (4/11/2017 — 8/8/2017) 3/17/2020 Plus 119 days tolled = 7/14/2020 Starting Date Ending date of Tolling Plus 6 month extension = 1/14/2021 Ending date of Tolling + 6 month extension Minus days that overlap with: Matthew: 10/3/2016 - 5/23/2017 Matthew and Zika overlap is from 10/3/2016 to 5/23/2017 or 232 days Zika: 6/23/2016 — 8/7/2017 Zika and Wildfires overlap is from 4/11/2017 to 8/7/2017 or 118 days Wildfires: 4/11/2017 — $/8/2017 Wildfire and Matthew overlap is from 4/11/2017 to 5/23/2017 or 42 days 17� E 232 days Plus 118 days Plus 92 days is 392 days 1/16/2021 Minus 392 days Is 12/19/2019 NNRI ENDING DIME: 13/19/3019 • • SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS • (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) most be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) most be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The signs) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent most replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER • BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED ROBERT J. MULHERE, PAICP WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER CUE-PL20170000680 v 950 ENCORE WAY SIPNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX ROBERT J. MULHERE, FAICP NAPLES, FL 34110 NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP N HOLE MONTES, INC. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this lith day of July 2017 by ROBERT J. MULHERE - personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. STEPHANIE KAROL �lVty )ttlMMx WN"' Holey Mile - Sim at Floods Signat of Notary Public Commission ♦ FF 939980 My Comm. Expires Mar 9. 2020 9ondM iM011pl NNIaW Ndrry'AfM. STEPHANIE EAROL • Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev.3/4 015 1001 MARING REQUESTIKG A CONDITIONAL' USE EXTENSION PETITION Ih CUE-FL20I70000610 NORTH COMER fIRF CdNITSM AMD A'ESCIVE 0I1TOIC7 re x ntua u t lr exl rr G"(1 HAM IAkNU.14 iR"i R[NfYYRk3NNnwY1tiRYew1Y 1/1lt.R1 ■IilRIS�RIYIDIa IY RY RlRINi � OY�RNARf B6fM1Ml NR IImP1RAIigllL�11 rd�teA� YlIRIAI n Ywfus Y MR A!b NBR M M�wA aA1M1�1 Wp twwllRiA NiM 9R nJlAf IYY1R N IR Yp P 11 IY 11i RNA R1 IwRY R RIRY*r uWlNM "111t1tthl" mw 1111114 MUNI d!!RMSn NY w41QR NfY1n MIR. Wo R111l.IIpR L!R•1 11ua: 411MB on Rte pr, W, - IA} iN ;G 1IM ttum VD ILMOMP �1 (411111 CoAf1 (More M wwIlla! R1Y1Y1, limpal lnl➢W K" 10"114,.p@ 1tAlllw^I 0F1 uKll la"o M �'�1�{ j I il: Ip N [PROTECTEDARNDRIDGIZONING 6' WAIL E-(Estates)ND KG[iATON R[MOVAL E 1-- - r SD FEET STRIP TO SE DiDICa1FD TO CWN, (vncaxr tOT) 0 15 30 `-' PRESERVE SIGN 1 11 Y 5.s cwc � I 1I I I FOR 'U R/W I �..unufao 15'L B.E, 1YPE 'B• •-1 SCALE FEET SCALE: 1' - 30•_ aD so'w Bss.sa rR� ilr c 15•L B E TYPE •B' k C: - PROPOSED I I ,r xm t!5 FftONi SETBACK _ RIPRAP.BANK LW 'PRESERVE E� _ _ I GI III I,. I k w on STROCTURAL UFFER _ PROPOSED PRESERVE 4y Y II �� vPe `o` j 15' Y Fla I w.l x .nT r" ... 1.83 -ACRES - - A PRESERVE AND CONSERVATON WETLAND. �YTIpN O 1T'lPE j n' i I� 0 f a 4e" I x r } EASEMENT. LINE_ CONSERVATION . IZ - EASEMEN I' UNE _ ASIN o S'IGon F. 3 BaY APParo�llB w�.F.-1990 qP h j u i,J f __, i'I7 �B PRESERVE Io V) III ^ I 8 � � _ .. ;W 9,I H jr / / \ \ ZONING E:.- (Estates) 75' FRONT SET3AC -I xoer,: x.mm Sr \ _ - \\ - PRESE s GN flVT (T'kP) �p• W 6 I I lO m I r - \A'w�' W�I I IOOI® I IIIiII OD vo I ..... vt�bmer) PROPOSED PRESERVE LINE, N� R51IPRBUACPl11BRAANLj< _ '• .�M.• FIRE a2, �r "f 4Np• Iw � •i 3 Q� 6 yg FiII pISJ_I E C POP a°ZZ ZNV IW �\ Q °� NE--- Z O Rji onvr O �!I N Ij I j I I w ";� 1D•La; - - _ _ - _ we ` a�3y� cs,nrRu,F IL Ilwt '.'r�,'_zB. r .`_- �. ...._- r i - rosnxc.a r c R/w _ _� zo.w rd �� 0.91gRDER I..Q� �_ AVEN�JF N.E- ]92 fifi 1-- - c r 6 WIDE PUBLIC R.O.W. sag ao soE 9sz]fi e. I �� I snuc R/w vp2.' ExrsnNc RJw rxssTwc R/w ROADWAY Ensm+c R/w ROADWAY WIDE ASPHALM AVEMENT (TYPICAL) SWAB s- I" VIII ZONING E - (Estates) "ER ZONING DISTRICT LAND USE SUMMARY "" ` TLD° PRESERVE PARKING: PER LDC ACRES PERCENTAGE USE REQUIRED PROVIDED LEGEND E' ZONING STANDARDS: FRONT SETBACK - DESOTO 75' - 22nd AVE 37.5' ( SIDE SETBACK - 3p' ••BUILDING AREA TANK & PUMPHOLISE PAVEMENT - 0.405 = 6.26 = 0.020 - 0.31 0.845 13.07 (LESS R/W) REQUIRED: 15% OF NATIVE VEGETATION 65X AC - 0.567 - 0.605 5.27 rn _ i5T z 5.27 0.79 AC " I STRATI VE AREA 7.215 ],215 SF / 200 = 36.1 SPACES LARGEST SHIFT: 12 EMPLOYEES x 2 = 24.0 SPACES 37 SPACES 24 SPACES PROPOSED PAVEMENT MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT - W. GRAVEL LOT - 0.044 - 0.68 PROVIDED: j I TOTAL = 60.1 SPACES 61 SPACES • CONCRETE/SIDEWALK WATER MANAGEMENT (FRONT) = 0.092 = 1.42 (LESS R/W) = 0.544 - 8.41 WETLAND PRESERVE - 1.62 AC � p< g UPLAND PRESERVE - 0.21 AC Sr� P HC PARKING REWIRED = 3 PROVIDfG = 3 PROPOSED PRESERVE WETLAND WATER MANAGEMENT (REAR) = 0.093 = 1.44 F.F. EL tB.e LOAolrvc REWIRED t P-DID- I N_ • WATER SERVICE BY WELL PRESERVE RESOT BUFFER - 2.034 - 31.46 0.082 = 1.27 - EL tss SPACE DENTERLINE NGs 1. THE STORM WA 1 ER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS TO 9E PROPOSED CONCRETE •WASTEWATER SERVICE BY SEPTIC DESOTO R/W - 0.606 = 9.37 DE501D BLVD BUILDING HEIGHT: REQUIRED = 309> MAINTAINED BY THE NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT. NOTE THE TORT PE AREA AT sass Es •INCLUOEi 22nd AVENUE R/W LANDSCAPE OPEN / = O.SB7 = 9.06 = 1.114 - 17.23 LESS R ( r'% THE MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT ��` SPACE: 5.273 X 30% = 1.56 ACRES PER THE LDCDEFINITIONMFITNI 30', MEASURED FROM FIRST FINISHED FLOOR 2. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION -TYPE 111-B 3. NUMBER OF STORIES - ONE TOTAL PROPOSED UPLAND -R THE -RE REDILATION OF b FEET 30 war To DESOTO BOULEVARD RITHE TOTAL GROSS AREA 6.466 • = 1007. PROVIDED = 73.3% THE MAXIMUM ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT 4. SQUARE FEET UNDER RDOF - 17,625 5. OCCUPANCY/USE - PUBUC/FIRE STATION - S.F. GROUP BUFFER ER TNG 30 FEET of RIGHT-oF-war ON 2- AVENUE N.E. TOTAL NET LOT AREA: - 5.273 (LESS R/W) PER DEFlNIBON IS 35', MEASURED FROM OPEN SPACE: 3.867 AC / 5.273 AC AVERAGE CENTER ELEVATION OF 6. SPRINKLED -YES ADJACENT ROADWAY DESOTO BLVD ( ) ]. CONTOUR ELEVATIONS ARE "NAND' ENGINEER: W. TERRY COLE, P.E. LICENSE No. 42347 NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE° STATION #14 09w.T;CI. -6 11 950 Encore Way Naples, FL. 34110 541" Phone: (239)254-2000 HOLE MONTES Florida Cenificateof as ma eawDs.susvDas Authorization No 1772 CONDITIONAL USE MASTER SITE PLAN nON 6092SP01A 4507-1 L.J. °""6'7 W.T.C. "TE6 17 BR_NP! 2oos.os2i "T"°= OF 2 A.DISTRICT K"s HpR DT�� ,rtR N A 1"=30' 6 GRAPHIC SCALE IN R1 24TH AVENUE NE — –--�- ..._..._.... ....... ... ,..,,,_,,. .,... ,,.. 1 clii4i�— CORKSCREW FIRE STATION 15 A RE O6 09 08 I t ..• Pw^d��.t>1x1 e MOHAMMAD 4 SADIA MAIIUN 0.8. BOOK 86]D, K. 3060 'ODIN ISO FEET OF TRACT 116 BOLDEN GTE ESTATES UNIT NO. 72 (P.D. S. K. 8) NBD'M'50"Ww BSa94' d MOM 150 FEET OF TRACT 115, N GOLDEN GTE MATES UNR N0. 72 r (P.6. 5, K. 6) .0 d EO¢ � wA ..r by 1D.1 3 Q I i SOH IRO FEET+OF T Its. d,do�r• ,dl GOLDENUTGATE ESTATES UNI O. 72 • e>' (PARA 5, N R) 22ND AVENUE d SB9'40'S0"E —&52]8' (60' WIDE) 8 I D s I Q EWO t MIRTA IEAL E I d O.R. ROOK 56o K. 66] d NORM I.ATE FEET OF FRIUNIT 114 GOLDEN GTE ESTATES UNIT NO. 72 I I' (PABA 5. K. 6) N I I • I I I R I I g I I I I , I LEGEND I I d —AT. ;.l Rye N� P LB I— I BFmETE1Fo OVF EMF i TCB ATm I�R-Ip,LLT qPE CEN9m P0.>PE�n —E PPE YivROHIM N° TEH B SxNRwnA¢ WT (BLTI4OIMAN(J -TER cwTRa STRUK is !P' COLLIER LAND HOLDINGS LTD O.R. BOOK 5]8], EG. 9k RECORDED IN PIAT BOOK S. PAGE 0 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIOA. AND TME SOUTH 180 FEET OF TRACT 115, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. R, ACCORDING TO THE PIAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 8 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THIS PROPERTY SUBIECT TO EASEMENTS. RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. CrAR NGS STIOND HEREON REFER THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 115, GOLDEN GATE FBI -UNIT NO. 72. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED INOPILAT BOOK 5, PAGE 8 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDAAS BEING N.SB•<050'W. PAR ELI AREA 3.526 EL2AFEA LM TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 64W ABOVE GROUND IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING ON THIS PROPERTY HAVE BEEN LOCATED HEREON AS SHOWN. ABOVE GROUND INDICATORS OF UNDERGROUND Lm LIT ES EAST NG ON THIS PROPERTY HAVE BEEN LOCATED HEREON AS SHOWN. UNDERGROUND URLITIEB HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED ON THIS SURVEY. ABSTRACT OF TITLE HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY SURVEYOR. ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM IN AV 0.) OF 1986. STATE PLANE COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON REFER TO F-CRIDASTATE PLANE EAST ZONE N AO 83.1965 A—STMENT. WETLAND LOCATION SHOWN AS FIAGGED BY COLLIER ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAINS 2.544 ACRES. WELLAND LOCATED USING TRIABLE SUBMETERACCURATE GPS. THIS PROPERTY WAS VACANT ON W1116. Digitally signed TAHIISSSURVETISNOTIVALICWTHDUTTHESIGNATURE AND THE ONIGINU RAISED SEAL DF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR DA PPER by Tom Murphy DN Cn TOT CERTFlEDTO BG CORKSCREW SIANDFRE CONTROL RESCUE DISTRICT y�y' Murphy, O, OU, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION ON M1/16. SS mdl iOmmur FURTHER CERT FY TH4T THSSURVEY MEEiS THE STANDARD50F PRgCT CE FOR LAND SURVEY NG NTHEBTATE OF e p FLOR Dq PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 511] 050 052 FAC hy@hmeng.com -0$ LE MONTES,IrvC., CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIlATION NUMBER LB IP2 Date: 2016.09.29 Ho 6 p 15:26:20-04'(1(1' BY /Y1'! A��i/ ES.— FIELD SMresOza FIELD BOOK 968/44-48; 969/22,25; 991/61 ..._..._.... ....... ... ,..,,,_,,. .,... ,,.. clii4i�— CORKSCREW FIRE STATION Nor VAU O IMMOUr 9MMTURE AND 8� umTMM A RE O6 09 08 �� 950 EncorO Way Naples, FL 34110 Phone: B, 2542000Tn6 HOLEMONTES Florida Certificate of ENcr£Fxs. RIAHVFRs-SURVEYDR6— IAxosrnRE rADBIEcrs Authorization No. 1772 BOUNDARY SURVEY 'Tic —1908-3 06A>w er. w.Te AT O6 OB xn/IE 6ArE G�BY MB D6 DB 06.092 IF, 8' scNc —48— 8 xa�xT 1= 0 ��'� N° 2006092-3.dwg AGENDA ITEM 3-B Comer County STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING SERVICES SECTION, GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JULY 27, 2017 SUBJECT: NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA WAWA SERVICE STATION, SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS, DR-PL20160001991 Owner/Applicant: Naples South Realty Associates, LLC 300 Avenue of Champions, Suite 140 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418 REQUESTED ACTION: Agent: Patrick Vanasse, AICP RWA, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 Petitioner, Naples South Realty Associates, LLC, requests approval of a site plan with deviations pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.03.17 and seeks three deviations relating to landscape buffer and masonry wall standards under Sections 4.06.02 and 5.05.05 of the Land Development Code, for a proposed Wawa facility with fuel pumps redevelopment project. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on the north side of U.S. 41, just east of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, in Section 19, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 8.73± acres. (See location map on following page). DR -P120160001991 -NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA Page 1 of 9 PROJECT LOCATION Rattlesnake Hammock RD Location Map O OO O' 0 0 0 0® a � 0 O O 60 000 OO Op p O O O 40 O O O' PUD O O O OO 00 RMF4616 RNF ® O4�0000000000 Qrc O Phaze111 OO M revcvruoo RMF -12 RACT F Poa C{ O TRACTGAM FW AT RPM f/JIW O Q TWJ RMF16 MPU O SITE LOCATION 4 Petition Number: PL20160001991 Zoning Map SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCELS: Existing shopping center called Naples South Plaza with a zoning Property Appraiser Website APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUESTED DEVIATION: The petitioner is seeking three (3) deviations from the requirements of the Land Development Code (LDC). The deviations we listed below with staff analysis and recommendations. DR -P]20160001991 -NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA Page 3 of 9 designation of C4 SURROUNDING: North: Rattlesnake Hammock Right -of -Way (ROW) and then residential development with a zoning designation of RMF -6 East: St. Peter Ministry Center with a zoning designation of C-4 and a Pepperwood Condominiums with a zoning designation of RMF -l2 South: Villa Falls at Naples with a zoning designation of C-4 and then Tamiami Trail East/US 41 West: Tamiami Trail East/US 41, Rattlesnake Hammock ROW and then a 7-11 with a zoning designation of C-4 Property Appraiser Website APPLICANT'S JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUESTED DEVIATION: The petitioner is seeking three (3) deviations from the requirements of the Land Development Code (LDC). The deviations we listed below with staff analysis and recommendations. DR -P]20160001991 -NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA Page 3 of 9 Deviation 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.D.2.a, which requires facilities with fuel pump sites to be separated from residential property by a thirty (30) foot wide landscape buffer and an architecturally designed masonry wall when located within 250 feet of residentially zoned or residentially developed properties, to allow for a two-tiered buffer with masonry wall and enhanced plantings. The proposed site will instead allow for a 25 -foot buffer in a portion of this location, including enhanced plantings, as well as an 8 -foot high masonry wall with 3 -foot berm within the buffer. The north portion of the existing buffer abutting residential narrows to 7 feet due to an existing drive aisle and loading dock. Petitioner's Rationale: The proposed Wawa is part of a larger commercial development, Naples South Plaza, which abuts a residential development, Pepperwood Condominium. If the proposed Wawa were not part of Naples South Plaza, it would be outside of the requirements of 5.05.05.D.2.a.; the proposed Wawa is over 250 feet from abutting residential. Additionally, the applicant states that the closest residential unit is over 300 feet from the convenience store and pump stations. The property was first developed in 1980 with several modifications as tenants changed, but with no major improvements or redevelopments. The existing conditions, Attachment A, currently provide limited landscape buffering which allows for a rear view of the shopping center from the residential development; the addition of the proposed buffer, wall, and berm would be a vast improvement for the neighboring property. A letter was submitted on behalf of the Condominium Board of Directors of Pepperwood of Naples Condominium Association in support of the "site redevelopment plan," Attachment B. Additionally, the applicant states that due to the existing drive lane, the existing landscape buffer area is not wide enough to accommodate a 30 -foot landscape buffer but is proposed instead to allow for a 25 -foot buffer narrowing down to a 7 -foot landscape buffer. The location of the narrowed landscape buffer of 7 -feet is due to the existing drive isle and loading dock; at this narrowed landscape buffer width, the wall will be located at the edge of pavement on the commercial side. The applicant also proposes an additional area of secondary buffering along the southern portion of shopping center as enhanced plantings for this request. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Naples Plaza South is an older shopping center development; the existing conditions, as they relate to the proposed site of Wawa, do not meet current architectural and landscaping standards. The existing infrastructure, which abuts the Pepperwood Condominium, does not permit the required 30 -foot landscape buffer as outlined by the LDC for fuel pump facilities which abut residentially zoned properties. Additionally, if the Wawa were a separate parcel, separate from the Naples South Plaza development, it would be outside of the 250 feet radius of 5.05.05.D.2.a. DR -P120160001991 -NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA Page 4 of 9 Existing infrastructure conditions (building and drive lane location) limit the applicant in their ability to plant a 30 -foot landscape buffer abutting the residentially zoned land. The purpose of a deviation for redevelopment is to assist in just that—provide allowance for redevelopment of existing sites which may provide limitations in meeting current Code requirements due to existing infrastructure. Staff can support this requested deviation and agrees with the applicant's statement that if it were not part of the larger shopping development, Naples South Plaza, it would not be required to meet the requirements of 5.05.05.D.2.a. Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.a. which requires landscaping adjacent to rights-of-way (ROW) external to the development project to be located within a landscape buffer easement which is a minimum of 25 feet in width. The applicant seeks to allow landscaping to be located within landscape buffer easement which are 15 feet in width. Petitioner's Rationale: The existing landscape buffer along US 41 currently meets landscape buffering requirements per LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, however will not with the proposed Wawa and LDC requirements for facilities with fuel pumps. The existing landscape buffer along Rattlesnake Hammock contains Type D plantings with an existing dry detention area buffer with a combined width, detention and plantings, varying between 25 feet and 50 feet. The applicant states that due to the existing building on the western portion abutting US 41 and the existing parking and drive aisles abutting Rattlesnake Hammock, expansion to the requirements in Section 5.05.05.E.1.a is not feasible. Additionally, these portions of the parcel, along US 41 and Rattlesnake Hammock, are not directly impacted by the proposed Wawa and would not be subject to improvement if developed as separate parcels. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The request is due to this shopping center being located on the same parcel as the proposed Wawa; it is this fact that requires an enhanced landscape buffer for portions of this parcel which are not directly impacted by the facility with fuel pumps. If it were not for the facility with fuel pumps, the existing landscape buffer abutting US 41 would meet LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4 requirements. And while the existing landscape buffer abutting Rattlesnake Hammock does not immediately meet LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4 buffer requirements, it does contain a combined varying width, 25 feet and 50 feet, of Type D plantings and dry area detention. The applicant proposes mitigation through enhanced plantings at the entry and exit of Rattlesnake Hammock as well as enhancements at US 41 in front of the building. Staff can support this requested deviation and believes that the proposed enhanced plantings in combination with the existing landscape buffers, both on US 41 and Rattlesnake Hammock, meet the intent of the LDC requirements for facilities with fuel pumps. Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C, Table 2.4, which requires a 15 -foot type B buffer for facilities with fuel pumps abutting C-4 Zoning and instead allow the existing 7 -foot to 10 -foot width type A landscape buffer to remain with enhancements. DR -P120160001991 -NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA Page 5 of 9 Petitioner's Rationale: There are two portions of this parcel which abut C-4 zoning—the northeast portion and the northwest portion. The northeast portion abutting C-4 has an existing 7 -foot landscape buffer which was previously approved by SDP 93-74. The applicant states that the expansion of the existing 7 -foot buffer to the required 15 -foot buffer would require removal of existing, required, parking spaces. Additionally, this C-4 parcel is screened from view from the proposed Wawa by the existing shopping center building. Furthermore, the applicant puts forth that the northeast portion abutting the C-4 parcel is over 375 feet from the proposed Wawa and if it were on a separate parcel it would be closer to compliance with what would be a 10 -foot type A buffer requirement. The northwest portion abutting C-4 is separated from this property line by 10 feet with parking immediately on the abutting C-4 parcel. Expansion of the buffer to 15 feet is not physically possible. The applicant proposes enhanced plantings on both the northeast and northwest portions abutting C-4. The enhanced plantings at these locations would serve to improve upon the conditions that currently exist, as evident by the attached photographs, see Attachment C. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The request is due to the landscape buffering requirements for facilities with fuel pumps; both portions are not immediately adjacent to the proposed convenience store with fuel pumps. The northeast and northwest C-4 abutting parcels are developed; the parcel being developed for the proposed Wawa is also developed. The existing developed nature of all abutting parcels make it difficult to comply with required LDC landscaping requirements due to the physical restraints created by the existing built environments. The abutting northeast parcel is a Ministry Center; this center abuts the existing shopping center and not the proposed Wawa. The abutting northwest parcel is a Wells Fargo. This bank abuts an existing building on the shopping center parcel; there is limited separation from the property line and an existing parking lot on the Bank parcel. The existing infrastructure on the northwest side makes meeting the required 15 -foot landscape buffer difficult. Staff can support this requested deviation and agrees that compliance with the required LDC buffering for facilities with fuel pumps is difficult due to the current built environment. ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the requested deviation against the established criteria for Site Plans with Deviations under LDC Section 10.02.03.F.7, and provide the below analysis. 1. Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district. The proposed deviations will not change the permitted land uses and densities within the development. DR -P120160001991 -NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA Page 6 of 9 2. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The subject site is designated Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict (#17) on the Future Land Use Map and in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan. The Subdistrict allows the full array of commercial zoning districts (Cl through C-5). The FLUE does not contain landscape buffer requirements or other development standards applicable to the subject area. Therefore, the proposed development may be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. 3. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. The proposed deviations recommended by staff will have a beneficial effect. It is staff opinion that the proposed development, while not fully meeting current LDC requirements, does propose landscape improvements and a masonry wall that exceeds the requirements upon which the site was originally developed. The proposed improvements will have both a visual and economic beneficial effect for the surrounding neighborhood and unincorporated Collier County. 4. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose The proposed deviations recommended by staff will not change the current land area within the development and are adequate to serve the intended purpose. 5. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sight distances, landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed deviations recommended by staff meet the purpose and intent of the LDC regulations as noted above for the proposed redevelopment. 6. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted. Staff has reviewed the information provided by the applicant and is of the opinion that the project will exceed the standards required of the development when originally permitted and will contain a better visual character than what currently exists. DR -P120160001991 -NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA Page 7 of 9 7. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee. At time of the Site Improvement Plan and Building Permit processing the proposed development improvements are subject to applicable maintenance requirements as well as standard confirmation and authorization of common ownership(s). 8. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. Staff finds that the petitioner's deviations recommended by staff are delineated and represent the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project as outlined and stated by the agents in the application. 9. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development. The applicant is proposing to provide alternative landscape enhancements on some of the deviations that will serve as a benefit to the surrounding area and Collier County. 10. Approval of the deviation(s) will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. Based the information provided in the application the proposed deviations recommended by staff, should not adversely affect adjacent properties. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office reviewed the staff report for this petition on 6/26/17. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve the following deviations of Naples South Plaza, Site Plan with Deviations, DR-PL20160001991. Deviation 1 is approved. The applicant has proposed an equivalent alternative. Deviation 2 is approved. The applicant has proposed an equivalent alternative. Deviation 2 is approved. The applicant has proposed an equivalent alternative. Attachments: A. RMF -12 Existing Conditions B. Condo Association Letter C. C-4 Existing Conditions D. Application DR -P120160001991 -NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA Page 8 of 9 PREPARED BY: RACHEL BEASLEY, ENIOR PLANNER DATE ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: 1-- 6 z4 17 RAY �OWS,MANAGER DATE ZON G SERVICES SECTION ?o� ---�r L -a8 -i1 MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION DR -P120160001991 -NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA Page 9 of 9 November 21, 2016 Collier County Commission Attn: Donna Fiala Subject: Naples South Plaza Redevelopment Dear Commissioner Fiala: This letter is submitted on behalf of the Condominium Board of Directors of Pepperwood of Naples Condominium Association located at 4967 Rattlesnake Hammock Road E. adjacent to the above subject property. Pepperwood consists of sixty four single family units. On November 9, 2016 representatives of the owners of Naples South Plaza invited all resident unit owners of our association to a presentation of the proposed redevelopment plan of the shopping center that Included removing a 15,000sf portion of the existing building and replacing that demolished portion with a Wawa Convenience Store with Six self-service gas pumps. In that presentation it was explained that In order to achieve the redevelopment, they were applying for a site plan with deviations meaning that the plan does not meet the standards of the existing code. The deviation that is most impactful to Pepperwood is the service station property which is located two hundred fifty feet from the Pepperwood residentially zoned property, but In fact, the properties are abutting each other. According to the owners of the South Naples Plaza, if the County does approve this plan they would still be required to build a buffer on the property line which is shared by the shopping center and the Pepperwood property. That buffer will be thirty feet In one area reducing down to seven feet directly behind the existing remaining shopping center. That buffer will consist of a three foot landscaped berm and an eight foot masonry wail. As a result of the presentation the residents of Pepperwood attending felt that these improvements would be an enhancement to the property since it is a vast improvement over the existing buffer. It is for this reason we the Board of Directors, on behalf of the Pepperwood unit owners, SUPPORT the site redevelopment plan as submitted and hereby ask the commission to vote in approval of the project. If you should have any questions, feel free to Jim Kuchar directly at 239-872-0009. Sincerely, Jim K ar sident Attachment B ,.� �� Y'1,,Q _ '. � -..� a � . ..�+x r a %`::'. e3� �` ` "e'`,�i s �„ . E. � { � __ qj �� k /. Y _ • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net Co er County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT LDC Section 10.02.03 F Ch. 6 1 of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT: Naples South Realty Associates, LLC - Richard Baer ADDRESS: 300 Avenue of Champions, Suite 140 CITY Palm Beach Gardens STATE FL ZIP 33418 TELEPHONE # 561-775-1300 CELL # 561-762-1985 FAX # 561-775-8088 E-MAIL ADDRESS: Baer@AmComRealty.com • NAME OF AGENT: Patrick Vanasse, AICP • FIRM: RWA, Inc. ADDRESS: 6610 Willow Park Dr. Suite 200 CITY Naples STATE FL ZIP 34109 TELEPHONE # 239-597-0575 CELL # FAX # 239-597-0578 E-MAIL ADDRESS: pvanasse@consult-rwa.com CORRESPONDING SDP, SDPA, SIP INFORMATION This application shall be submitted in conjunction with one of the following: site development plan, site development plan amendment, or site improvement plan. PROJECT NAME/PL # IF KNOWN: PL20160001991 PLANNER/PROJECT MANAGER, IF KNOWN: Fred Reischl DATE OF SUBMITTAL OF SDP/SDPA/SIP: 1/9/2017 9/11/2014 Page 1 of 3 Co Y County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 INFORMATION REGARDING DEVIATION REQUESTS A site plan with deviations for redevelopment provides a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations (excluding height), architectural deviations, and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping, parking, and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings, structures, or site features nonconforming. A site plan with deviations may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan, site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03. Except for the requested deviations, the site plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03. In accordance with LDC , or remodeling of a building or structure, or required infrastructure, in whole or in part, where the existing buildings, structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. DEVIATION REQUESTS The application must address the follow requirements. Please attach the required narratives and explanations. 1. A narrative of the redevelopment project and how it is consistent with the standards for approval, LDC section 10.02.03 F.7. • 2. Description of each requested deviation and justification for each request. Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition. The LDC section for which the deviation seeks relief from shall be identified. 3. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly identified on the site plan and explanation provided. 4. Deviation Request types: Zoning Deviation Requests - Check all that may be impacted by the request. ❑ Dimensional standards (excluding height): 0 Parking ❑ Architectural 0 Landscape/ Buffers ❑ Other site features: Engineering Deviation Requests - Check all that may be impacted by the request. ❑ stormwater ❑ Pathways ❑ Transportation Planning ❑Other site features: • 9/11/2014 Page 2 of 3 C7 • • Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Site Development Plan with Deviations for 9 ❑ ❑ Redevelopment Application Completed SDP/SDPA/SIP application and all associated materials, 9+ 0 ❑ including all site plan documents. Copy for the Pre -Application Notes, if not submitted with 1 ❑ ❑ SDP/SDPA/SIP Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 El ❑ Electronic Copy of all documents and plans on CD *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all ❑ ❑ ❑ materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 'Unless waived by the Project Manager. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARNG PROCESS: At the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. FEE REQUIREMENTS [� Site Plan for Redevelopment: $1,000.00 X Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation 9/11/2014 ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Page 3 of 3 Page 1 of 3 • Wawa at Naples South Plaza Redevelopment Narrative This site plan with deviations request is for a proposed partial redevelopment of the Naples South Plaza to include a Wawa fuel pump facility. The property currently consists of +/- 8.73 acres containing 87,148 sq. ft. of retail space. The proposed Wawa will occupy +/- 2.55 acres. The property was first developed in 1980, with several modifications as tenants changed, including a remodeling related to SDP 93-74 and renovations related to SDPA-AR-8135. However, no major improvements or redevelopment having been undertaken. As such, the proposed improvement is seen as a first step in upgrading and redeveloping the site. The section of the existing structure that will be replaced does not meet current architectural and landscaping standards, whereas the completed Wawa would meet such standards and be more aesthetically pleasing from both Hwy 41 and abutting commercial and residential development. Wawa is a popular and well-respected gas station and convenience store brand that will enhance the plaza's visibility and commercial activity. This new tenant will provide an economic boost to the plaza and engender continued investment in the overall site. Due to regulation changes over the years, the recently adopted standards for Facilities with Fuel Pumps and the existing site configuration, this site plan with deviations application is sought to allow this redevelopment project to move forward with the SDP permitting process. The requested deviations are consistent with the intent of the Site Plan with Deviations Process. They allow redevelopment of the • subject property by accommodating alternative landscaping standards through mitigation while improving the site's functionality, public health and safety conditions, and compatibility with surrounding uses. This request for a Site Plan with Deviations is needed due to the 30' landscape buffer with 8' masonry wall and 3' berm that would be required between the residential zoning at the east corner of the site. If not for the fact that this facility is located within a larger commercial property, it would meet the required 250' separation from residential property, exempting it from these supplemental standards (LDC 5.05.05.D). The proposed mitigation related to this deviation will meet the intent of the new LDC regulation through enhanced buffering and shielding, as well as the distance separation of the fuel facilities from the property line. Additional mitigation will also serve to enhance the landscaping and buffering aesthetic of the overall site. With the exception of the 30' buffering requirement, all other supplemental standards aimed at addressing potential areas of concern and ensuring compatibility are being met. Other than the 30' buffer this project meets all newly adopted standards for facilities with fuel pumps. All other requested deviations are associated with the rest of the commercial site where nonconformities were created over time due to regulation changes. The proposed deviations and mitigation will bring this center into conformance and improve overall conditions and aesthetics. The added convenience of a popular gas station such as Wawa is an upgrade from smaller, dated gas stations and meets current consumer expectations and desires. It is proposed in an area of the county experiencing rapid growth, where significant demand for such a facility is expected. This location is appropriate as it is situated near the intersection of two major roadways, is easily accessible, and abuts commercial property, other than the 200' shared boundary with Pepperwood Condominiums. The developer of this project met with residents of that property on August 10th. The feedback received, pending a further association meeting, was that there was no objection to the redevelopment. • K:\2014\140035.01.01 Rattlesnake & 41— Naples South Plaza\001 Site Plan with Deviations\Site Plan with Deviations\Application Support\1st Insufficiency\Working Docs\2017-2-21 Redevelopment Narrative.docx Page 2 of 3 Consistency with LDC, Section 10.02.03 F.7 Standards for approval. The petition shall be reviewed for consistency with the following standards: Land uses and densities within the development shall be consistent with the permitted and approved conditional uses in the zoning district. The subject property is located in the General Commercial District (C-4) which permits the gasoline service station use. See LDC Section 2.03.03. D.1. a. 60 b. The proposed development is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The subject property is located within a Mixed Use Activity Center subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map which allows for a full array of commercial uses. See Future Land Use Element as of Ordinance No. 2015-42 p.57. • c. The development shall have a beneficial effect both upon the area in which it is proposed to be established and upon the unincorporated area as a whole. The redevelopment of the subject property will serve to enhance the character of the center and will provide goods and services above and beyond those of other such facilities in the area. The redeveloped property will not only be easily accessible but its improved convenience, functionality, and proximity to a major intersection will be of benefit to the larger surrounding area. Secondary benefits will come from increased occupancy and eventual upgrades to the entire commercial center. d. The total land area within the development and the area devoted to each functional portion of the development shall be adequate to serve its intended purpose. With the approval of the deviations, the subject property will adequately serve the proposed use and the existing commercial center. e. Streets, utilities, drainage facilities, recreation areas, sizes and yards, architectural features, vehicular parking and loading facilities, sight distances, landscaping and buffers shall be appropriate for the particular use involved. K:\2014\140035.01.01 Rattlesnake & 41— Naples South Plaza\001 Site Plan with Deviations\Site Plan • with Deviations\Application Support\1st Insufficiency\Working Docs\2017-2-21 Redevelopment Narrative.docx Page 3 of 3 • Other than the newly adopted 30' buffer, all fuel pump facility requirements can be met. The other deviations requested are for non -conformities resulting from code changes since the center's original development and are not related to the Wawa. The section of the structure being demolished for this project is not in compliance with several current architectural and landscaping requirements. These would be brought into compliance with the construction of the Wawa. f. Visual character of the project shall be equal or better in quality than that required by the development standards for the zoning district. The visual character of the project shall be better in quality than the existing project before redevelopment and after it was first permitted. With the new landscaping plan, pavement resurfacing, and compliance with the architectural requirements, the new Wawa facility will improve the appearance of the existing plaza. The new Wawa building, improved access points, and new site paving will provide a much better aesthetic appearance along Highway 41. The enhanced and secondary buffers will further improve the aesthetic for the residents of the adjacent property. g. Areas proposed for common ownership shall be subject to a reliable and continuing maintenance guarantee. N/A • h. Deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition and shall be the minimum required to achieve the goals of the project and comply with these standards. As described in the Deviations and Justifications document and depicted on the Deviations Exhibit, this project will meet this requirement. i. The petitioner has provided enhancements to the development. The proposed plan improves the project's landscaping through enhanced and secondary buffering, as well as the functionality of the site through improved access points and parking lot resurfacing. j. Approval of the deviation will not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. The subject property will provide commercial goods and services in an area of the county experiencing rapid growth and will be easily accessible to the residential neighborhoods in the vicinity. The improved access, aesthetics and desirability of the property will further ensure the compatibility with adjacent properties. • K:\2014\140035.01.01 Rattlesnake & 41— Naples South Plaza\001 Site Plan with Deviations\Site Plan with Deviations\Application Support\1st Insufficiency\Working Docs\2017-2-21 Redevelopment Narrative.docx ssn Co er County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-5358 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20160000623 I Richard Baer AJC NAPLES SOUTH CORP. (choose one) owner x applicant _(print name), as vP (title, if applicable) of (company, if applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that 1 am the contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/1 authorize RWA, Inc. to act as ourhny representative in any matters regarding this petition including I through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pies. • if"tire applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L. C.) or Limited Company (L. C), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " • If the applicant is a partnership, then 01pically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If'the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identifued as the "general partner" of the namedpartnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustees name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. tti clypteS 5eWi�Yta•+�4+t Wssoc:ce5 U.C. ay: Asc-A)-*ttis sou+ , Cewy— T -n: Si ure J tcx 9r -S, -J C(Ii-- Dat STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on i'')G'1 1 r �U17 (date) by Ridc,LC6e- (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as U,�c wh is personally known to me r who has produced (type of identificationA identification. STAMP/SEAL CP10S-COA-0011'11155 3/2/16 Notary Public KRYSTAL CROSS MY COMMISSION * FF19491;. EXPIRES April 10 2019 Jt Page 6 of 9 Page 1 of 2 Naples South Plaza - Wawa Site Plan with Deviations List of Requested Deviations and Justifications Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.D.2.a, which requires facilities with fuel pump sites to be separated from residential property by a thirty (30) foot wide landscape buffer and an architecturally designed masonry wall when located within 250 feet of the residentially zoned or residentially developed properties, to allow for a two-tiered buffer with masonry wall and enhanced plantings. Given the existing drive lane the existing landscape buffer area is not wide enough to accommodate a 30' landscape buffer. The proposed site plan will instead allow for a 25 ft. buffer in a portion of this location, including enhanced plantings, as well as an 8' high masonry wall with 3' berm within the buffer. Where the existing buffer narrows to 7 ft. it cannot be expanded due to being encumbered by the drive isle and loading dock expansion at the rear of the building. As evident in the attached photographs (Exhibit A), the proposed buffer, wall, and berm will be a dramatic improvement to conditions that currently exist in this location. An additional area of secondary buffering will provide further screening to the adjacent property, the total of which will exceed that of the required 30 ft. buffer. In its current condition this area contains limited landscape buffering and allows for a view of the rear of the shopping center from the residential development. As such, the addition of the proposed buffer, wall, and berm • would be a vast aesthetic improvement for the neighboring property. Additionally, if not for the fact that the proposed Wawa were part a larger commercial development, the Wawa use would not be subject to the 30' buffer requirement since the proposed facilities are at least 250 ft. from the abutting residential development. Moreover, the closest residential unit is over 300 ft. from the convenience store and pump stations As stated in the LDC (Sec. 5.05.05.D.a) "Facility with fuel pumps sites shall be separated from residential property by a thirty (30) foot wide landscape buffer". As such, only this small portion of the property abutting residential zoning should be subject to this buffering. Standard LDC buffering will apply in areas of the property where the existing commercial shopping center abuts either residential or commercial zoning. The proposed landscape plantings in this area include Slash Pine trees to tie in with the existing vegetation, a Green Button wood hedge, 10 gal, 4' o.c. on both sides of the wall, and Muhly Grass on both sides to the property line and edge of pavement. For the portion of this buffer that is 7' in width, the wall will be located at the edge of pavement on the commercial side, with a Green Buttonwood hedge 10 gal. 4' o.c. on the residential side. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.05.E.1.a, which requires landscaping adjacent to rights- of -way external to the development project to be located within a landscape buffer easement which is a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet in width to allow landscaping to be located within landscape buffer easements which are 15 feet in width. is K:\2014\140035.01.01 Rattlesnake & 41- Naples South Plaza\001 Site Plan with Deviations\Site Plan with Deviations\Application Support\1st Insufficiency\Working Docs\Responses to comments 6-8-17\2017-06-14 Deviations and Justifications.docx Page 2 of 2 LDC section 4.06.02.C.4 requires a 15' Type D buffer along roadways with a ROW greater than 100' • abutting C-4 zoning. Currently a 15' type D buffer exists along the right-of-way for Hwy 41, meeting the LDC requirements. In the case of Rattlesnake Hammock Type D plantings exist along this boundary, and combined with existing dry detention areas buffer widths vary between 25' and 50'. In both cases these buffers and detention area exceed the LDC requirements for right of way widths for the current Naples South Plaza use. Expansion of these buffers to meet the requirements of LDC Section 5.05.05.E is not feasible, as a building exists on the western portion abutting Hwy 41 and parking and drive aisles would be greatly impacted in portions abutting Rattlesnake Hammock. Additionally, these portions of the plaza are not where the Wawa will be located and would not be subject to improvement if developed as separate parcels. Mitigation for these non -conformities will be done through enhanced plantings including Sabal Palm clusters at the entry and exit at Rattlesnake Hammock Rd, along with supplemental Fakahatchee Grass and Dwarf Bougainvillea plantings in front of the existing Cocoplum hedge. The landscape enhancements at Hwy. 41 in front of the existing building will include removing the Live Oaks and Black Olives which are in conflict with overhead utilities, and replacing the trees with Silver Buttonwood to match the plantings in front of the Gas/Service Station. The existing Seagrape hedge will remain. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C, Table 2.4, which requires a 15' type B landscape buffer for facilities with fuel pumps abutting C-4 Zoning, to allow the existing 7'- 10'width type A landscape buffer to remain with enhancements. The northeast portion of the property subject to this deviation is over 375' from the proposed Wawa • and is screened from view by the existing building. Additionally, the existing 7' buffer was previously approved per SDP 93-74. Expansion of the buffer to 15' in this area would require the removal of needed spaces to meet parking requirements. If not for the fact that the entire property is now subject to fuel pump facility buffering requirements, this portions of the property would be closer to compliance with what would be 10' type A buffer requirements. The northwest side of the existing building on Hwy. 41 is separated from the property line by a 10' buffer, with parking for the adjacent Wells Fargo parcel immediately adjacent to the property line. Expansion of the buffer to 15' is not physically possible. Mitigation of these non -conformities will be done through enhanced plantings within the existing buffers to achieve the quantities required for a Type B buffer. At the northeast corner, existing trees are to remain, exotics will be removed; the existing Cocoplum hedge will be cleaned up and additional shrubs planted to fill in gaps left by exotic removal. At the northwest side of the existing building at Hwy. 41, the existing trees are to remain, and shrub plantings will be added between the building canopy and adjacent parking. Due to the visibility desired for retail, the shrubs are proposed to be 24" ht at 3' o.c. instead of 5' ht at 4' o.c. Mitigation for the width of these two areas is provided in the triangular area on the western portion of the property. The enhanced plantings at these locations would serve to improve upon the conditions that currently exist, as evident by the attached photographs (Exhibit B and C). K:\2014\140035.01.01 Rattlesnake & 41- Naples South Plaza\001 Site Plan with Deviations\Site Plan with Deviations\Application is Support\1st Insufficiency\Working Docs\Responses to comments 6-8-17\2017-06-14 Deviations and Justifications.docx • • 1�1 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: DR - Site Plan with Deviations Date and Time: 8/25/16 Assigned Planner: Daniel James Smith Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: WAWA- Naples South Plaza PL #: PL20160001991 Property ID #: 55151440001 Project Address: 4961 Tamiami Tr. E. Applicant: RWA Engineering Agent Name: Agent/Firm Address: Current Zoning: C-4 City: State: Zip: Phone: 239-597-0575 City: State: Zip: Property Owner: Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#JPL#: CoMer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 • www.collier-gov.ne (239) 252-2400 1 Meeting Notes 0 /C7 5'0jp# kcl' J -D P 04 t -A li 4) o2 7rwV I RO " — 5 (!XD ' 'D (,-raA u= be- t-Wi,Ataori P-.)/3 pal a I L"i 3 m m m MAT., pr i.•1 = = on- m I NJ 1-0- ZIN. Ma 110 REM I r ..... ..... ..... ..... MIRT'll imlwAill w- Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes • CoMer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 • www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes • • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.collieEgov.net • Cao Y County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS FOR REDEVELOPMENT LDC Section1'1 1 • oftheAdministrative• i PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS: CITY STATE ZIP TELEPHONE # E-MAIL ADDRESS: NAME OF AGENT: FIRM: ADDRESS: CELL # CITY TELEPHONE # CELL # E-MAIL ADDRESS: FAX # STATE ZIP CORRESPONDING SDP, SDPA, SIP INFORMATION FAX # This application shall be submitted in conjunction with one of the following: site development plan, site development plan amendment, or site improvement pian. PROJECT NAME/PL # IF KNOWN: PLANNER/PROJECT MANAGER, IF KNOWN: DATE OF SUBMITTAL OF SDP/SDPA/SIP: 9/11/2014 Page 1 of 3 Coder Gmnty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 2S2-2400 INFORMATION REGARDING DEVIATION REQUESTS A site plan with deviations for redevelopment provides a means for a redevelopment project to seek dimensional deviations (excluding height), architectural deviations, and deviations from site features, such as but not limited to, landscaping, parking, and buffers, from the standards established in the LDC when the passing of time has rendered certain existing buildings, structures, or site features nonconforming. A site plan with deviations may be requested for the redevelopment of a site which meets the criteria for a site development plan, site development plan amendment or a site improvement plan as established in LDC section 10.02.03. Except for the requested deviations, the site plan shall comply with LDC section 10.02.03. In accordance with LDC section 10.02.03 F, "redevelopment" shall mean the renovation, restoration, or remodeling of a building or structure, or required infrastructure, in whole or in part, where the existing buildings, structures or infrastructure were legally built and installed. DEVIATION REQUESTS The application must address the follow requirements. Please attach the required narratives and explanations. 1. A narrative of the redevelopment project and how it is consistent with the standards for approval, LDC section 10.02.03 F.7. • 2. Description of each requested deviation and justification for each request. Requested deviations shall be clearly delineated in the petition. The LDC section for which the deviation seeks relief from shall be identified. 3. Project enhancements to offset or minimize the deviations shall be clearly identified on the site plan and explanation provided. 4. Deviation Request types: Zoning Deviation Requests . Check all that may be impacted by the request. ❑ Dimensional standards (excluding height): ❑ Parking ❑ Architectural ❑ Landscape / Buffers ❑ Other site features: Engineering Deviation Requests - Check all that may be impacted by the request. ❑ Stormwater ❑ Pathways ❑ Transportation Planning ❑Other site features: • 9/11/2014 Page 2 of 3 0 11 is Cover County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Site Development Plan with Deviations for 9 ❑ Redevelopment Application Completed SDP/SDPA/SIP application and all associated materials, 9+ including all site plan documents. Copy for the Pre -Application Notes, if not submitted with 1 ❑ El SDP/SDPA/SIP Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 1El Electronic Copy of all documents and plans on CD *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all (� materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. +Unless waived by the Project Manager. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARNG PROCESS: At the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. FEE REQUIREMENTS Site Plan for Redevelopment: $1,000.00 u Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation 9/11/2014 ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Page 3 of 3 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coLliLer&ov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL. ## �-._.. r,r201 000 / -I 1 ) Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email Richard Anderson Environmental Specialist 252-2483 richardanderson@colliergov.net David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net Steve Baluch, P.E. Transportation Planning 252-2361 StephenBaluch@colliergov.net Laurie Beard Transportation Pathways 252-5782 Lauriebeard@colliergov.net Rachel Beasley Planner 252-8202 rachelbeasley@colliergov.net Marcus Berman County Surveyor 252-6885 MarcusBerman@colliergov.net Madeiin Bunster Architectural Review 252-8523 madelinbunster@colliergov.net Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@colliergov.net George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio@colliergov.net Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst, County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@colliergov.net Eric Fey, P.E. Site Plans Reviewer 252-2434 ericfey@colliergov.net Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net Shar Hingson East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.org John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net (' Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes@colliergov.net Alicia Humphries Site Plans Reviewer/ROW 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net Eri ohnson, AICP,CFM Zoning Services 252-2931 ericjohnson@colliergov.net arcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net Stephen Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 paulomartins@colliergov.net Thomas Mastroberto Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@coIIiergov.net Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Impact Fees 252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net Stefanie Nawrocki Planning and Zoning 252-2313 StefanieNawrocki@colliergov.net Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheltree@colliergov.net Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@colliergov.net • • is 0 • 0 Co eV COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.ne 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net Stacy Revay Transportation Pathways 252-5677 stacyrevay@colliergov.net Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net Michael Sawyer Zoning Services 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net Chris Scott, AICP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net Nniel Smith, AICP Landscape Review 252-4312 danielsmith@colliergov.net Ellen Summers Planning and Zoning 252-1032 EIlenSummers@colliergov.net Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen@colliergov.net Jon Walsh - Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwaIsh@colliergov.net David Weeks, AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5748 ChristineWilloughby@colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: la Name Representing Phone Email III A jA v 29 rt ev A." ee&t tea A-1 cl- A la E, CIV Oer COUMty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressinga@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing Dersonnel prior to are -application meeting please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) 0 SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIP[ (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) • ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) Attached I ,-, „ FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 56151440001 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 4961 Tamiami Trail E. Naples FL 34112 • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (ifapplicable) Wawa PROPOSED STREET NAMES (ifapplicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) •SDP-- or AR or PL # PL20160001991(DR) CO ICT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: [Q Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Ashley Caserta Phone: 239-597-0575 Email/Fax: acaserta@consult-rwa.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 515 14 -% v +" Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: fL �; Date: Updated by: Date: • IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED • Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary • Parcel No. 55151440001 Site Adr. 4961 TAMIAMI TRL E Name / Address NAPLES SOUTH REALTY ASSOC LLC % AMERICAN COMRC REALTY CORP 300 AVENUE OF THE CHAMPIONS SUITE 140 City PALM BEACH GARDE State FL Zip 33418 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5619 458800M 13 145B19 19 50 26 8.73 LELY GOLF EST TR MAP LOT 13 COMM, NELY R/W U S 41 + SELY R/W SR 864, N 51 DEG E 175FT TO POB CONT N 51 DEG E 68.36FT , NELY ALG ARC OF CURVE 260.42FT, E 396.54FT, S 533.08FT, S 51 Legal DEG'W 45OFT TO ELY R/W U S 41, N 39 DEG W ALG R/W 500FT, N 51 DEG E 175FT, N 39 DEG W 25OFT TO POB, LESS OR 2128 PG 2167 ADDT'L R/W, LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2315 PG 1944 . Millage Area O 106 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 458800 - LELY GOLF ESTATES TRACT MAP School Other Total Use Code 6'16 - COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTERS 5.48 6.1927 11.6727 Latest Sales History 2015 Certified Tax Roll • (f <•t (€ so, i;% c d"' , t�orsfida"ns ';iter (Subject to kiarxrel Date Book Page Amount Land Value $ 2,282,328:: 09/08/03 3390-2935 $ 5,279,800 {+) Improved Value $ 2,639,869; 08/01/82 9982-1001 $ 0 08/01/78 766_117 $ 0 {_} Market Value $ 4,922,197 (_) Assessed Value $ 4,922,197', {_) School Taxable Value $ 4,922,197 {=) Taxable Value $ 4,922,197 I9 a9i VaIAies shown above equal 0 this parcel +a as creates aft e! Ow Fin::,I T ax Pon • .� c ,n e ;D r,s a y�'t`14 Lor �r RMF -6 � ZorUng. •�� ,:s . Dc a\ '4896 4900 4900 4930 4936 4960 4924 .� .,:. 4940 ,t¢yX _ 4970 g ' Unit:BLbG -=,, nit`.22 -,— 4950 —� * �- 4964.14968 5006` . �_- ST. PETER,. CATHOLIC 481,1, ..*. >nrrt<ivCHURCH -• Unrt:C2 S: 18 # of 9 RPF; -1 r, .e +R. 26 ' •'• R'ait.t l,'e`s?n,alk'e1liDistrict:k1 0 4837 e� District: 4 PENNY 'TAYLOR, .OJ c f SAS Ri?J D0NNAIFIALA ! Wind Loadr,. 4901 Category 2. :r , r:_ .. c'.. 2 166 mph m u �> 4915 r .,. Exch PF 4919 40tee' { i{tt f 5025 r 4901 Y. ''�, Pepper C I R Exc�) PU 4929 /uU 4954"!'i m 4955 `' �- 05&,165' - 4903 :,ax it:BLDG C 4931 S 19 4933 4957 Zoning: # '" d - T 50 Unrt:202 RMF -12 �;• , �. a R: 2B' 4935: �Z r 4971 ` 4963 r F 4923 .. ',Unit: B fDG D 4963 r 5 i �` �• ��` r Unitr201 = 49r�7 4967Unit 101 � Unit BLDG G 5045; .,."..� Excp `PDI r- lint: MP.UD4 µ } t X4930• X 5091., Zolmlc RMF= -16 - 4973 5101 1v�'� -700 Uni '3G Zor # of lint: MP.UD4 µ } t X4930• X 5091., Zolmlc RMF= -16 - 4973 5101 1v�'� -700 Uni '3G Goer County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD—Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressinq personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) •❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑' OTHER Site Plan with Deviations LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) See Attached S19 T 5 0 R26 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 55151440001 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 4961 TAMIAMI TRL E, Naples FL • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) • SDP_- or AR or PL # 20160000623 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: Q Email Applicant Name: Tiffany Bray / RWA, Inc. Phone: 239-597-0575 ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Email/Fax: TBRAY(cDCONSULT-RWA.COM / 239-597-0578 Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. • FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 55151440001 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number i Approved by:_ Date: 1/6/2017 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED • Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 55151440001 Site Adr. 4961 TAMIAMI TRL E • Name /Address NAPLES SOUTH REALTY ASSN LLC % STILES CORP 301 E LAS OLAS BLVD 5TH FL City FT LAUDERDALE State ' FL Zip 133301 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5B19 458800M 13 145B19 19 50 26 8.73 LELY GOLF EST TR MAP LOT 13 COMM, NELY R/W U S 41 + SELY R/W SR 864, N 51 DEG E 175FT TO POB, CONT N 51 DEG E 68.36FT , NELY ALG ARC OF CURVE 260.42FT, E 396.54FT, S Legal 533.08FT, S 51 DEG W 45OFT TO ELY R/W U S 41, N 39 DEG W ALG R/W 500FT, N 51 DEG E 175FT, N 39 DEG W 25OFT TO POB, LESS OR 2128 PG 2167 ADDT'L R/W, LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2315 PG 1944 Millage Area 0 106 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 458800 - LELY GOLF ESTATES TRACT MAP School Other Total Use Code 0 16 -COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTERS 5.58 6.2197 11.7997 • Latest Sales History 2014 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book -Page i Amount Land Value i$ 2,225,270' 09/08/03 3390-2935 $ 5,279,800 P $ 2,401,609 ._ ...,.- (+) Improved Value 08/01/82 982-1001 $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 4,626,879,, 08/01/78 766-117 i $ 0 (_) Assessed Value $ 4,626,879 (_) School Taxable Value $ 4,626,879 (_) Taxable Value $ 4,626,879' If all Values shown above equal Q this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 0 0 MASTER PLAN NOTES: 1. THIS SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGES DUE TO AGENCY REVIEW AND SITE CONDITIONS. 2. ACREAGE, AND THE DESIGN, LOCATIONS AND CONFIGURATIONS OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO REFINEMENT AT THE TIME OF THE SDP APPROVAL. DEVIATION #1 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05.D.2.9, WHICH REQUIRES FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMP SITES TO BE SEPARATED FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY BY A THIRTY (30) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND AN ARCHITECTURALLY DESIGNED MASONRY WALL WHEN LOCATED WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE RESIDENTIALLY ZONED OR RESIDENTIALLY DEVELOPED PROPERTIES, TO ALLOW FOR ATWO-TIERED BUFFER WITH MASONRY WALL AND ENHANCED PLANTINGS DEVIATION #2 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.A, WHICH REQUIRES LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO RIGHTS-OF-WAY EXTERNAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN A LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT WHICH IS A MINIMUM OF TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET IN WIDTH TO ALLOW LANDSCAPING TO BE LOCATED WITHIN LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENTS WHICH ARE 15 FEETIN WIDTH. DEVIATION #3 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02.0, TABLE 2.4, WHICH REQUIRES A 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS ABUTTING C-4 ZONING, TO ALLOW THE EXISTING 7' TYPE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO REMAIN WITH ENHANCEMENTS. PARKING LEGEND PARIONG PROPOSED BUILDING PROJECT INGRESS/EGRESS ODEVIATIONS LOCATIONS A MITIGATION LOCATIONS MASTER PLAN NOTES: 1. THIS SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGES DUE TO AGENCY REVIEW AND SITE CONDITIONS. 2. ACREAGE, AND THE DESIGN, LOCATIONS AND CONFIGURATIONS OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO REFINEMENT AT THE TIME OF THE SDP APPROVAL. DEVIATION #1 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05.D.2.9, WHICH REQUIRES FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMP SITES TO BE SEPARATED FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY BY A THIRTY (30) FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND AN ARCHITECTURALLY DESIGNED MASONRY WALL WHEN LOCATED WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE RESIDENTIALLY ZONED OR RESIDENTIALLY DEVELOPED PROPERTIES, TO ALLOW FOR ATWO-TIERED BUFFER WITH MASONRY WALL AND ENHANCED PLANTINGS DEVIATION #2 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.05.05.E.1.A, WHICH REQUIRES LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO RIGHTS-OF-WAY EXTERNAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN A LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT WHICH IS A MINIMUM OF TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET IN WIDTH TO ALLOW LANDSCAPING TO BE LOCATED WITHIN LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENTS WHICH ARE 15 FEETIN WIDTH. DEVIATION #3 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02.0, TABLE 2.4, WHICH REQUIRES A 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER FOR FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS ABUTTING C-4 ZONING, TO ALLOW THE EXISTING 7' TYPE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO REMAIN WITH ENHANCEMENTS. PARKING BUILDING PARIONG AREA INF, REQUIREMENT PROPOSED CONDMONS 78,049 1 SPACE PER 250 SF - EXISTING I SPACE PER 200 SF, * 1 PER 2 SEATS - WA WELLS NTNG) 3 \ (C-4 ZONING) 3 \ 3 k r z STj SPACES SPACES REQUIRED PROVIDED \ \ WA 329 314 W 6610 Will— Park Drrve SuRe 200 Na les, Florida 34109 (239) 59]575 FAX: (239) 597-05]8 e��n-fA.rom Florida Cer 1663es LB 695 orization lNGIN!lRING Ee7663 Ls695z _ e VILLAGE FALLS AT NAPLES (C-4 ZONING) ST.PETER MINISTRY CENTER (C-4 ZONING) PEPPERWOOD CONDOMINIUM (RMF -12 ZONING) cu6mr: AMERICAN COMMERCIAL REALTY CORP. "c" NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA me WAWA SERVICE STATION SITE PLAN WITH DEVIATIONS 0.01 TZD15.01.01 "'1400350101EXH MSP �1 aer�l AGENDA ITEM 3-C CoiLier County STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXANIINER FROM: ZONING SERVICES SECTION, GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JULY 27, 2017 SUBJECT: NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA WAWA SERVICE STATION, AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION WAIVER, ASW-PL20170000082 Owner/Aoolicant: Naples South Realty Associates, LLC 300 Avenue of Champions, Suite 140 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418 Agent: Patrick Vanasse, AICP RWA, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 Petitioner, Naples South Realty Associates, LLC, requests a waiver from the minimum required separation of 500 feet between facilities with fuel pumps pursuant to Section 5.05.05.B of the Land Development Code, for a Wawa station that will be on property located 191.77 feet from the existing 7-11 station. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on the north side of U.S. 41, just east of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, in Section 19, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. ASW-PL20170000082-Naples South Plaza Wawa Service Station Page 1 of 6 Location Map p 0 �o p o p O © � Ot 0 0 0 O 60 0 0 p 0 10 0 07 O O p O' O O0 0 O 0 O OO 0 0 PUO ® ORMF•i616 0 0 0 RMF 0 000^ Q Q� Q �aelll o M PU RMF-12 RUT F 0 Cd TROGAw Fu AT sCM _ 0 0 TWCTJ Q RMF•66 I e MPUD SITE p LOCATION 0 N Petition Number: PL20170000082 Zoning Map SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCELS: Existing shopping center called Naples South Plaza with a zoning designation of C-4 ' I • AU 1Z W, North: Rattlesnake Hammock Right -of -Way (ROW) and then residential development with a zoning designation of RMF -6 East: St. Peter Ministry Center with a zoning designation of C-4 and Pepperwood Condominiums with a zoning designation of RMF -12 South: Property zoned C-4 and then Tamiami Trail East/US 41 West: Tamiami Trail East/US 41, Rattlesnake Hammock ROW and then a 7-11 with a zoning designation of C-4 Aerial from Property Appraiser Website ASW-PL20170000082-Naples South Plan Wawa Service Station Page 3 of 6 HISTORY: The Naples South Plaza was first developed in 1980. The proposed Wawa convenience store with fuel pumps is part of this Plaza. The property currently consists of +/- 8.73 acres containing approximately 87,148 square feet of retail space. The proposed Wawa will occupy +/- 2.55 acres. The total proposed shopping center to remain will be 72,106 square feet and the proposed Wawa will be 5,943 square feet. This property is bordered by Rattlesnake Hammock Road on the north and Tamiami Trail East to the west and southwest. There is a 7 -Eleven fuel pump station at the northwest corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Tamiami Trail. While the proposed Wawa itself exceeds the required separation of 500 feet for facilities with fuel pumps per LDC Section 5.05.05.13.1, it is part of the Naples South Plaza and thus the distance from fuel pump facility to fuel pump facility must be measured from property line to property line. The property line to property line measurement at the nearest point shows the Naples South Plaza is separated from the parcel containing the 7-11 by 191.77 feet. Thus, the applicant seeks an automobile service station waiver from Section 5.05.05.13.1 requiring separation from adjacent facilities with fuel pumps of 500 feet to a new separation of 191 feet. This petition is being submitted in conjunction with a Site Plan with Deviations where three landscape buffer requirement deviations are being sought for this shopping parcel. ANALYSIS: The zoning General Commercial District (C-4) permits facilities with fuel pumps as well as food/convenience stores. Section 5.05.05.13.1 requires a separation of 500 feet from another facility with fuel pumps as measured from the nearest point. The subject property is 191.77 feet from the closest automobile service station, measured property line to property line. Section 5.05.05.B.2 permits a waiver of the separation requirements. The BZA's decision to waive part or all of the distance requirements shall be based on the following factors: i. Whether the nature and type of natural or manmade, structure, or other feature lying between the proposed establishment and an existing automobile service station is determined by the BZA to lessen the impact of the proposed service station. Such boundary, structure, or other feature may include, but is not limited to, lakes, marshes, nondevelopable wetlands, designated preserve areas, canals, and a minimum of a 4 - lane arterial or collector right-of-way. - ANALYSIS: The proposed automobile service station has a manmade boundary between the site and the existing station: Rattlesnake Hammock Road is a 4 -lane minor arterial road, Attachment A. Additionally, there is an outparcel (Wells Fargo) and an 8,950 -square foot building located within the shopping center parcel between the two facilities. The man-made boundary (Rattlesnake Hammock Road) and the 2 structures lessen the impact of the proposed facility with fuel pumps. ii. Whether the automobile service station is only engaged in the servicing of automobiles during regular, daytime business hours, or, if in addition to or in lieu of servicing, the station sells food, gasoline, and other convenience items during daytime, nighttime, or on a 24 hour basis - ANALYSIS: The proposed automobile service station will only service ASW-PL20170000082-Naples South Plaza Wawa Service Station Page 4 of 6 automobiles as a fuel source. It will sell food, gasoline, and other convenience items on a 24-hour basis. iii. Whether the service station is located within a shopping center primarily accessed by a driveway, or if it fronts on and is accessed directly from a platted road right-of-way. - ANALYSIS: The proposed automobile station is located within a shopping center. The proposed Wawa will be accessed directly from US 41 as well as via the shopping center driveway from Rattlesnake Hammock Road. iv. Whether the granting of the distance waiver will have an adverse impact on adjacent land uses, especially residential land uses. - ANAYLSIS: Adverse impacts to adjacent land uses: • Commercial land uses: The greatest impact may be to the existing automobile facility with fuel pumps, on the west side of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. This is a 4 station, 8 gas pump facility with fuel pumps operating 24 hours, 7 days a week. And while this may be more of an economic impact from additional competition, not a land related impact, it should be noted that the Market Analysis for the proposed Wawa states, pg. 10, that over the next five years there will be a 23.47% deficit supply of gasoline to service the Market Area. The project percentage of this market area is calculated to be 21.91 %; thus, even with the addition of the proposed Wawa in the Market Area, there will be 1.56% supply deficit. • Residential land uses: There is one residentially zoned development, zoned RMF -12, adjacent (east) to the shopping center parcel which is where the proposed Wawa is located. Since the proposed Wawa is part of the Naples South Plaza shopping parcel, it is considered adjacent to this development zoned RMF -12. It should be noted, however, that the proposed Wawa itself is not adjacent to the parcel zoned RMF -12; thus, mitigating adverse impacts. Additionally, the Owner's Association of the adjacent property has provided their support for the proposed Wawa development, Attachment B. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office reviewed the staff report for this petition on 6/26/17. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve this application. Attachments: A. Roadway Classification B. Condo Association Letter C. Application ASW-PL20170000082-Naples South Plaza Wawa Service Station Page 5 of 6 PREPARED BY: 2 k 6 /7 �- RACHEL BEASLE , SENIOR PLANNER DATE ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: 6 Zb-i7 RAY f9E4LOWS, MANAGER DATE ZONING SERVICES SECTION MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION ASW-PL20170000082-Naples South Plaza Wawa Service Station Page 6 of 6 November 21, 2016 Collier County Commission Attn: Donna Fiala Subject: Naples South Plaza Redevelopment Dear Commissioner Fiala: This letter is submitted on behalf of the Condominium Board of Directors of Pepperwood of Naples Condominium Association located at 4967 Rattlesnake Hammock Road E. adjacent to the above subject property. Pepperwood consists of sixty four single family units. On November 9, 2016 representatives of the owners of Naples South Plaza Invited all resident unit owners of our association to a presentation of the proposed redevelopment plan of the shopping center that Included removing a 15,000sf portion of the existing building and replacing that demolished portion with a Wawa Convenience Store with Six self-service gas pumps. In that presentation it was explained that in order to achieve the redevelopment, they were applying for a site plan with deviations meaning that the plan does not meet the standards of the existing code. The deviation that Is most impactful to Pepperwood is the service station property which is located two hundred fifty feet from the Pepperwood residentially zoned property, but In fact, the properties are abutting each other. According to the owners of the South Naples Plaza, if the County does approve this plan they would still be required to build a buffer on the property line which is shared by the shopping center and the Pepperwood property. That buffer will be thirty feet in one area reducing down to seven feet directly behind the existing remaining shopping center. That buffer will consist of a three foot landscaped berm and an eight foot masonry wall. As a result of the presentation the residents of Pepperwood attending felt that these Improvements would be an enhancement to the property since it Is a vast improvement over the existing buffer. It Is for this reason we the Board of Directors, on behalf of the Pepperwood unit owners, SUPPORT the site redevelopment plan as submitted and hereby ask the commission to vote in approval of the project. If you should have any questions, feel free to Jim Kuchar directly at 239-872-0009. Sincerely, Jim K ar silent Attachment B LEGEND 'a�1 r,' q•• � � d �,L'?� � '� PROPOSED RURDMG H PROIEQMGRESS/EGRESS kk ,A .fie �.� - � 1 RAITLFSNAKEHA6 I � kr�o. I'� 1. � • •� weuuxo i C.11� A � I Aw 12 1 �T \ WfP q w� • � ��'� � IAM 4 V —e ma AMFPIGN (UIMBelAtNAIW(U1. w•eew mm lwuu WAWA YFN(ESIAMNWN ' lIEIIiK nnu u� SBARIIKKIWPNiAf1016Ti • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.ne • 0 Coflie'r County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PETITION FOR WAIVER FROM SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS LDC subsection 5.05.05 B & Code of Laws section 2-83 - 2-90 Chapter 6 G. of the Administrative Code PETITION NO (PL) PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Naples South Realty Associates, LLC Address: 300 Avenue of Champions City: Palm Beach Gardens State: FL ZIP: 33418 Telephone: 561-775-1300 cell: 561-762-1985 Fax: 561-775-8088 E -Mail Address: Baer@AmComRealty.com Name of owner(s): Naples South Realty Associates, LLC - Richard Baer . 300 Avenue of Champions, Suite 140 City: Palm Beach Gardens FL 33418 Address. state: ZIP: Telephone: 561-775-1300 cell: 561-762-1985 Fax: 561-775-8088 E -Mail Address: Baer@AmComRealty.com PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (if space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: 55151440001 Section/Township/Range:19 /50S/26E Subdivision: 458800 - Lely Golf Estates Tract Map Unit: Lot: 13 Block: Metes & Bounds Description: See attached exhibit A Address/general location of subject property: 4961 TAMIAMI TRL E Naples FL 34112 BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 6/3/2014 Page 1 of 4 Cof1 r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ZONING INFORMATION Current Zoning of subject property: C-4 Adjacent property information: Please address the following waiver request details on an attached separate sheet: 1. What is the extent of the waiver being requested (in linear feet) from the required 500 foot separation? (NOTE: This measurement is the shortest distance between the nearest points of any two lots occupied by an Automobile Service Station, or for which a building permit has been issued.) 2. The Office of the Hearing Examiner may grant a waiver for part or all of the minimum separation requirements set forth in LDC subsection 5.05.05 B, if it is demonstrated by the applicant and • determined by the Office of the Hearing Examiner that the site proposed for development of an Automobile Service Station is separated from another Automobile Service Station by natural or man- made boundaries, structures or other features which offset of limit the necessity for such minimum distance requirements. Staff's analysis and subsequent recommendation, and the Office of the Hearing Examiner's determination, are based on the following criteria as provided by LDC section 5.05.05 B. Please provide a narrative, on a separate sheet attached to this application, describing how the waiver complies with the criteria listed below to the extent you wish as it pertains to the proposed use. a. Describe the nature and type of natural or man-made boundary, structure, or other feature lying between the proposed establishment and an existing Automobile Service Station which may, as determined by the reviewing body, lessen the impact of the proposed service station. Such boundary, structure, or other feature may include, but is not limited to, lakes, marshes, nondevelopable wetlands, designated preserve areas, canals, and a minimum of a four -lane arterial or collector right-of-way. b. Whether or not the Automobile Service Station is only engaged in the servicing of automobiles during regular, daytime business hours, or if in addition to or in lieu of servicing, the station sells food, gasoline and other convenience items during daytime, nighttime, or on a 24-hour basis. c. Whether the Automobile Service Station is located within a shopping center primarily accessed by a driveway or if it fronts on and is accessed directly from a platted road right-of-way. d. Whether or not the granting of the distance wavier will have an adverse impact on adjacent land • uses especially residential land uses. 6/3/2014 Page 2 of 4 Zoning Land Use N Right of Way Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. S C-4 The Village Falls Shopping Center E C-4 / RMF -12 Ministry Center / Pepperwood Condominiums W Right of Way US 41 WAIVER REQUEST DETAIL Please address the following waiver request details on an attached separate sheet: 1. What is the extent of the waiver being requested (in linear feet) from the required 500 foot separation? (NOTE: This measurement is the shortest distance between the nearest points of any two lots occupied by an Automobile Service Station, or for which a building permit has been issued.) 2. The Office of the Hearing Examiner may grant a waiver for part or all of the minimum separation requirements set forth in LDC subsection 5.05.05 B, if it is demonstrated by the applicant and • determined by the Office of the Hearing Examiner that the site proposed for development of an Automobile Service Station is separated from another Automobile Service Station by natural or man- made boundaries, structures or other features which offset of limit the necessity for such minimum distance requirements. Staff's analysis and subsequent recommendation, and the Office of the Hearing Examiner's determination, are based on the following criteria as provided by LDC section 5.05.05 B. Please provide a narrative, on a separate sheet attached to this application, describing how the waiver complies with the criteria listed below to the extent you wish as it pertains to the proposed use. a. Describe the nature and type of natural or man-made boundary, structure, or other feature lying between the proposed establishment and an existing Automobile Service Station which may, as determined by the reviewing body, lessen the impact of the proposed service station. Such boundary, structure, or other feature may include, but is not limited to, lakes, marshes, nondevelopable wetlands, designated preserve areas, canals, and a minimum of a four -lane arterial or collector right-of-way. b. Whether or not the Automobile Service Station is only engaged in the servicing of automobiles during regular, daytime business hours, or if in addition to or in lieu of servicing, the station sells food, gasoline and other convenience items during daytime, nighttime, or on a 24-hour basis. c. Whether the Automobile Service Station is located within a shopping center primarily accessed by a driveway or if it fronts on and is accessed directly from a platted road right-of-way. d. Whether or not the granting of the distance wavier will have an adverse impact on adjacent land • uses especially residential land uses. 6/3/2014 Page 2 of 4 Co►ev County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 • • Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Waiver from Separation Requirements for Automobile Service Stations Chapter 6 G. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download from website for current form) C] 0 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 x ❑ Pre -Application meeting notes x Conceptual Site Plan 24 in. x 36 in., along with one reduced copy 8 Y2 in. x 11in. J ❑ ❑ Warranty Deed 2 [] ❑ Affidavit of Authorizationsigned and notarized 2 E] Environmental Data Requirements, if required 3 ❑ ED Aerial photographs 5 ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 Q ❑ Letter of no objection from the United States Postal Service. Contact Robert M. Skebe at (239) 435-2122. 1 ❑ 0 Written Market Study Analysis ❑ x *If located in the Bayshore/Gateway triangle Redevelopment Area, include an additional set of each submittal requirement ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 4 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliersov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet Addressing: Annis Moxam Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ❑ Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -in Sheet ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Ty Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Lj Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock ❑ Engineering: Alison Bradford Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky ❑ I Other: ❑ Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (to be credited towards the application fee if the application is filed within 9 months of pre -application meeting) Automobile Service Station Separation Requirement Waiver: $1,000.00 D", Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner or the BZA: $500.00 Agent/Owner Signature Applicant/Owner Name (please print) 5/8/2017 Date 6/3/2014 Page 4 of 4 • • Page 1 of 3 • Wawa at Naples South Plaza Petition for Separation Waiver Narrative This petition for waiver from separation requirements is for a proposed Wawa fuel pump facility located within Naples South Plaza. The proposed Wawa is part of Naples South plaza, and existing shopping center. The proposed Wawa does exceed the required 500' separation from another facility with fuel pumps per LDC 5.05.05.B.1. However, the existing overall plaza and property line does not. When measured from property line to property line at the nearest point, the Naples South Plaza is separated from the 7-11 fuel facility at the north corner of the Rattlesnake Hammock/US 41 intersection by 191 ft. However, when measured from the 7-11 property line to the nearest entrance of Wawa facility along the length of US 41, the separation is 580' and 674' to the facility itself, as referenced on the Separation Waiver Exhibit 1. In addition to the separation distance, the 7-11 and proposed Wawa facilities would be separated by Rattlesnake Hammock Rd., a four lane urban collector highway. Irrespective of the 500' separation, the separation of these facilities with fuel pumps by a major roadway such as this would itself warrant consideration of this waiver, according to section 5.05.05 B.2.i Below is LDC, Section 5.05.05 B.2 in its entirety, allowing for the waiver of separation requirements. • Detailed descriptions are provided for the factors in which the proposed Wawa would qualify for such a waiver. Eligibility for Waiver based upon LDC. Section 05.05.05 B.2 2. Waiver of separation requirements. a. The BZA may, by resolution, grant a waiver of part or all of the minimum separation requirements set forth herein if it is demonstrated by the applicant and determined by the BZA that the site proposed for development of a facility with fuel pumps is separated from another facility with fuel pumps by natural or man-made boundaries, structures, or other features which offset or limit the necessity for such minimum distance requirements. The BZA's decision to waive part or all of the distance requirements shall be based upon the following factors: i. Whether the nature and type of natural or man-made boundary, structure, or other feature lying between the proposed establishment and an existing facility with fuel pumps is determined by the BZA to lessen the impact of the proposed facility with fuel pumps. Such boundary, structure, or other feature may include, but is not limited to, lakes, marshes, nondevelopable wetlands, designated preserve areas, canals, and a minimum of a 4 -lane arterial or collector right-of-way. - Several such boundaries, structures, and features lie between the proposed Wawa and the existing 7-11 fuel facility, including Rattlesnake Hammock Rd., a 4 -lane urban collector highway, an outparcel containing a Wells Fargo bank with requisite • K:\2014\140035.01.01 Rattlesnake & 41— Naples South Plaza\001 Site Plan with Deviations\Se pa ration Waiver\Application Prep\Separation Waiver Submittal #1 Working Docs\2017-1-7 Wawa Separation Narrative Page 2 of 3 parking and landscape buffering, as well a 8,950 sq. ft. building located within the • shopping center parcel. All of these features serve to lessen the impact of the proposed Wawa facility. ii. Whether the facility with fuel pumps is only engaged in the servicing of automobiles during regular, daytime business hours, or, if in addition to or in lieu of servicing, the facility with fuel pumps sells food, gasoline, and other convenience items during daytime, nighttime, or on a 24 hour basis. - The proposed Wawa will not provide servicing of automobiles. In keeping with Wawa's history of providing high quality food prior to having sold gasoline, the proposed Wawa will sell food, gasoline, and other convenience items on a 24 hour basis. iii. Whether the facility with fuel pumps is located within a shopping center primarily accessed by a driveway, or if it fronts on and is accessed directly from a platted road right-of-way. - The proposed Wawa will be accessed directly from US 41, and while not platted, is a public right of way, as well as via the shopping center driveway from Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. In addition to improvements made at access points to the Wawa, all access points throughout the shopping center will be improved to facilitate better traffic flow. iv. Whether the granting of the distance waiver will have an adverse impact • on adjacent land uses, especially residential land uses. - The proposed Wawa improvement will not have any adverse impacts on adjacent land uses. The site development plan for the Wawa includes enhanced landscape buffering and improved vehicular access throughout Naples South Plaza. Conditions in the center will be greatly improved over those that currently exist, in particular in the area abutting residential land uses. The installation of an 8' masonry wall, 3' berm, and enhanced buffering along the residential property line will greatly improve the aesthetics over what currently exists. Additionally, the owners association of the adjacent property has provided their supportfor the proposed Wawa development. b. The Administrative Code shall establish the submittal requirements for a facility with fuel pumps waiver request. The request for a facility with fuel pumps waiver shall be based on the submittal of the required application, a site plan, and a written market study analysis which justifies a need for the additional facility with fuel pumps in the desired location. - Acknowledged K:\2014\140035.01.01 Rattlesnake & 41— Naples South Plaza\001 Site Plan with Deviations\Separation • Waiver\Application Prep\Separation Waiver Submittal #1 Working Docs\2017-1-7 Wawa Separation Narrative Page 3 of 3 • c. Additional conditions. The BZA shall have the right to add additional conditions or requirements to its approval of a distance waiver request in order to insure compatibility of the facility with fuel pumps with the surrounding area and the goals and objectives of the GMP. - Acknowledged As discussed with staff, when separation requirements were drafted, staff envisioned "stand alone" gas stations and failed to recognize that some of these gas stations could be included as part of a larger commercial center. This inadvertent oversight has created a situation in which we need to request this waiver, even though there is a recognition that this project meets the intended separation requirement. Not only does the proposed Wawa meet several of the code requirements for waiving of the 500' separation of facilities with fuel pumps, were it not for the fact this facility was located within a larger shopping center parcel its separation would far exceed this minimum distance. In addition, the redevelopment of this portion of the site as well as the landscape buffering and traffic improvements made throughout the center represent a substantial upgrade to the existing condition. The approval of this waiver petition and associated site plan with deviations will allow for such improvements to take place, with the intent for further redevelopment and upgrades to the center in the future. r� • K:\2014\140035.01.01 Rattlesnake & 41— Naples South Plaza\001 Site Plan with Deviations\Separation Waiver\Application Prep\Separation Waiver Submittal #1 Working Docs\2017-1-7 Wawa Separation Narrative 4-v*- 4colfler 0014 ty • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) •❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑m OTHER Petition for Waiver from Separation Requirements for Automobile Service Stations LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) See Attached S19 T 5 0 R26 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 55151440001 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 4961 TAMIAMI TRL E, Naples FL • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) . SDP= or AR or PL # 20160000623 COTL7er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Tiffany Bray / RWA, Inc. Phone: 239-597-0575 Email/Fax: TBRAY@CONSULT-RWA.COM / 239-597-0578 Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. • FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 55151440001 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by:_ Date: 1/6/2017 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE • UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 55151440001 Site Adr. ; 4961 TAMIAMI TRL E Name / Address NAPLES SOUTH REALTY ASSN LLC % STILES CORP 301 E LAS OLAS BLVD 5TH FL City FT LAUDERDALE State FL Zip 33301 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5B19 458800M 13 145B19 19 50 26 8.73 LELY GOLF EST TR MAP LOT 13 COMM, NELY R/W U S 41 + SELY R/W SR 864, N 51 DEG E 175FT TO POB, CONT N 51 DEG E 68.36FT , NELY ALG ARC OF CURVE 260.42FT, E 396.54FT, S Legal 533.08FT, S 51 DEG W 45OFT TO ELY R/W U S 41, N 39 DEG W ALG R/W 500FT, N 51 DEG E 175FT, N 39 DEG W 250FT TO POB, LESS OR 2128 PG 2167 ADDT'L R/W, LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2315 PG 1944 Millage Area 0 106 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo' 458800 - LELY GOLF ESTATES TRACT MAP School Other Total Use Code 0 16 - COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTERS 5.58 6.2197 11.7997 • Latest Sales History 2014 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book -Page Amount Land Value $ 2,225,270 09/08/03 3390-2935 $ 5,279,800 _._ Improved Value $ 2,401,609 08/01/82 982-1001 $ 0 _ (_) Market Value $ 4,626,879 • 08/01/78 766-117 $ 0 - (_) Assessed Value $ 4,626,879. (_) School Taxable Value $ 4,626,879 (_) Taxable Value $ 4,626,879, If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll • • o I F� �g • • 0 IbisimtfYmddby and mum ,o. 3254309 0!\: 3390 PG: 2935 no M�ella. 0: toll 5211150.11 MA11111 ! KI H. canine ll. i1illl It Al HCOND to till 011IC3Ai II=1 of couln MM. IL "CPU 10.50 22 —1I0 All 11250 01i'UU 01/01/2001 1t 10:52H OLIN! L IM, Cllll OOC-,i0 36951.00 Parcel Idefflffi&&AC§ . 33Hi4i431 :6' 1 4.({- o c, c- I SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED This Indenture, made this 4 Li day of August,2003 between CANPRO INVESTMENTS, LTD.,- INVESTISSEMENTS CANPRO, LTEE, an alien corporation, registered under the Canada Business Corporation Act, authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose address is 376, Rue Victoria Bureau 400, Westmount (QC), Canada H3Z1C3, Grantor*, and NAPLES SOUTH REALTY ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose post office address is 4400 PGA Blvd, Suite 305 Palm Beach ardens Florida 33410 Grantee, WITNESSETH: That said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of ($10.00) Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to -wit: SEE EXHIBIT "A", LEGAL DESCRIPTION, ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. Subject to restrictions, reservations, easements and limitation of record, if any, provided that this shall not serve to reimpose same, zoning ordinances, and taxes for the current year and subsequent years. Said grantor does hereby coven#,the ick; hat the Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple, that the Grantor has good ll and convey said land, and hereby fully warrants the title to said land and wi same again wful claims of all persons claiming by, through, or under the Grantor. *"Grantor" and "grantee" are IN WITNESS written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: r Print Name: 01Fr: t7RvLIt�F cl Print Name: i PROVINCE OF QUEBEC for to grt Y 'sane and seal the day and year first above CANI r,IVVESTMENTS, LTD., {� INVES NTS CANPRO,LTEE an alien - tered under the Canada Business #M s Act, authorized to do business In the of Florida By David J. Avieli, its President [Corporate Seal] COUNTRY OF CANADA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14 day of August,2003 by DAVID J. AZRIELI, as President of CANPRO INVESTMENTS, LTD.,- INVESTISSEMENTS CANPRO, LTEE, an alien corporation registered under the Canada Business Corppration Act, authorized to do business in the State, of Flori3a a is personally known to me or hit's prod cid ci �«M , f as identification. (k1woly Im I al !1 iM [NOTARY SEAL] Print Name: w ' t ,> S A PI V11 Commission Number. t My Commission E>: .% *** OR; 3390 PG; 2936 *** EXHI$IT "A" • That certain piece, parcel of land situate, lying and being in the City of Naples, County of Collier, State of Florida, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwesterly corner of Tract M, Lely Golf Estates as recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 20 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, said corner also being the intersection of the Easterly right-of-way line of U.S. 41 (SR 90) and the Southerly right-of-way line of S.R. 864; thence along the Southerly right-of-way line of S.R. 864, N5U°54'40" E 243.36 feet; thence 31.68 feet along the arc of a circular concave to the Southeast, radius 377.50 feet, chord bearing N53° 18'54" E 31.67 feet for a place of beginning; thence 228.74 feet along a continuation of the last prescribed circular curve, chord bearing N73°0441" E 225.26 feet; thence S89033'50" E 396.54 feet; thence SO°26'10" W 533.08 feet; thence S50053140" W 450.00 feet to the Easterly right-of-way line of U.S. 41; thence N39°06'20" W 500.00 feet; thence N50°54'40" E 175.0 feet; thence N39°06'20" W 100.00 feet; thence N50°54'40" E 100 feet; thence N39°06'20" W 148.67 feet to the place of beginning, being part of said Tract M of said Lely Golf Estates and being subject to a 20 foot wide Florida Power & Light Company easement adjacent to the Easterly right-of-way line of said U.S. Form E (Rev 6/89) 21:DS 1003 0 LESS THE FOLLOWING: �>0- Commencing at the North a to corner of Tract M, f Estates, as recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 20 of the Public eco .er County Flori sai corner also being the intersection of the East ly 'ght lin o 1 and a utherly right-of-way line of S.R. 864; thence along he y f 8 N5005440" E 175.00 feet for a place of beginning; t enc c nti in a o li , N50054'40" E 68.36 feet; thence 87.75 feet alon a rc of i u r conc a to utheast having a radius of • 377.50 feet chord bear 12 .5 th said right-of-way S25°21'27" E 86.66 feet; thence 89. t along the arc of a la cu nave to the West having a radius of 230.00 feet, chring S 149 '57" E . 6 Q ce S86°5337" W 28.72 feet; thence S50°54'40" W 74.1 t encs N39°06'20" eet; to the place of beginning. LESS AND EXCEPT ANY P (j$ ED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2128, PAGE 2167. Form E (Rev 6/89) 21:DS 1003 0 • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net • Coher County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) 1 Richard Baer AJC NAPLES SOUTH CORP. (choose one) owner x PL20170000082 (print name), as vP (title, if applicable) of (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the applicant _ contract purchaser _ and that: 1. I have filll authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4, The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/l authorize RWA, Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. Pres. or v. Pres. • Jf the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.LC) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the ConiparT s "11anaging illember. " • Jf the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • 1f'the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee ". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. �°'IP Ssu+t t Iioa� �'t Asso6c4-e5 LJ -C- yy �y: ViTC.A�t+eS sou4h Ccx}+. Sts: vNc,,yb�rYl� h��! vI-7 Sire U � c x Qv-S-tk f -n+— Dat STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on fl-IM.1 l a x,60 (date) by ,,C 1(LC6 t Cae-r (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as VIU aP-jCi-nt who &9&r nown to me r who has produced (type of identification identification. • STAMP/SEAL Cl'108-COA-00115\155 3/2/16 ---WrJ%L VIKOSS My commissinni . -_ Page 6 of 9 4/7/2017 Detail by Entity Name • A:q ,,./.f °/)lam! �,• .! _� _r�% • • Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Detail By Document Number / Detail by Entity Name Florida Profit Corporation AJC NAPLES SOUTH CORP. Filing Information Document Number P03000078397 FEI/EIN Number 14-1889473 Date Filed 07/16/2003 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 300 AVENUE OF THE CHAMPIONS SUITE 140 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33418 Changed: 04/26/2016 Mailing Address 300 AVENUE OF THE CHAMPIONS SUITE 140 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33418 Changed: 04/26/2016 Reaistered Aaent Name & Address BAER, RICHARD 300 AVENUE OF THE CHAMPIONS SUITE 140 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33418 Name Changed: 05/03/2010 Address Changed: 04/26/2016 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title Director, President COHEN, ANDREW J 9 EAST 40TH STREET 10TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10016 DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearctVSearchResultDetail?iriquirytype= EntityName&di rectionType= Initial&searchNameOrder=AJCNAPLESSOU... 1/2 4/7/2017 Title Director, VP RICHARD, BAER 300 AVENUE OF THE CHAMPIONS SUITE 140 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33418 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2015 04/29/2015 2016 04/26/2016 2016 10/27/2016 Document Imaaes 10/27/2016—AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT 04/26/2016 —ANNUAL REPORT 04/29/2015 —ANNUAL REPORT 08/18/2014 —ANNUAL REPORT 04/23/2013 —ANNUAL R E PORT 04/26/2012 — ANNUAL REPORT 04/27/2011 —ANNUAL REPORT 05/03/2010 — ANNUAL REPORT 05/01/2009 — ANNUAL REPORT 05/05/2008 — Reg. Agent Change 04/16/2008 —ANNUAL REPORT 04/25/2007 — ANNUAL REPORT 04/29/2006 —ANNUAL REPORT 04/19/2005—ANNUAL REPORT 05/06/2004 — ANNUAL REPORT 07/16/2003 — Domestic Profit Detail by Entity Name _u View image in PDF format - J View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format J View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF formate View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format l View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format View image in PDF format _.___.._..__m___m___ I View image in PDF format • • http://Search.sunbiz.orgtInquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchRestAtDetail?inquirytype=Er tityName&directionType= lnitial&searchNameOrder=AJC NAPLESSOU... 2/2 MARKET ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED WAWA GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE ON TAM IAM I TRAIL EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA May 8, 2017 Prepared for Naples South Realty Associates LLC 300 Avenue of Champions, Suite 140 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33419 Prepared by @oil Planning - (.e w --penults„ Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Suite 100 707 Orchid Drive Naples, Florida 34102 (239) 269-1341 Ree-i.Com Executive Summary • Naples South Realty Associates LLC ("Developer") is seeking approval for a proposed Wawa gas station/convenience store ("Project") at 4930 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida. The proposed Project is sited on the north side of Tamiami Trail East just east of the Tamiami Trail East — Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection and is comprises of 1.64 acres. The Project will make a significant contribution to the Collier County Economy while at the same time support the rapid growth in its market area without adversely affecting the efficient gasoline market economy in that market. • Gasoline market demand is anticipated to grow 24.96% in the Wawa market area over the next five years. • The proposed Wawa convenience store/fuel station will increase the same gasoline market supply by 21.91 % • The Project will generate 22 permanent jobs, 11 indirect jobs, $827,804 in salaries and create an annual economic output of $2,507,021. • The Project will generate $8,072 in annual property taxes to Collier County. • The Project will $228,150 in annual gas taxes to Collier County. • The proposed Project will not only keep the gasoline markets efficient by providing the needed supply to accommodate the growing demand in East Naples but will also be a major economic contributor as outlined in this report. Background Naples South Realty Associates LLC ("Developer") is seeking approval for a proposed Wawa gas station/convenience store ("Project") as a part of the larger Naples South Plaza ("Master Commercial Development") shopping center. The Master Commercial Development is located at 4930 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida. The proposed Project is sited on the north side of Tamiami Trail East just east of the Tamiami Trail East — Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection and comprises 1.64 acres of the Master Commercial Development's total acreage. • The proposed Project, while directly separated from an existing 7-11 convenience store and fuel station (7-111") by over 500 feet, the Project 'boundaries' are considered a part of the over Master Commercial Development boundaries and therefore fall within 500 feet of 7-11 thus Collier County staff is requiring a market analysis for the Project. Real Estates Econometrics, Inc. ("Consultant") has been retained to analyze the fuel market for the Developer. The Consultant is well -versed in preparing market analysis studies especially in the Southwest Florida marketplace. This Study is comprised of four (4) parts; the market area demographics, demand/supply comparison market analysis, Project economics and conclusions. 1.0 Market Area Demographics 1.1 Market Area Definition Since the convenience store/fuel station market is being analyzed, it is appropriate to define the market area for such use by using a drive time calculation. Drive times are calculated by Environmental Systems Research Institute ("ESRI"). The ESRI Business Analyst Program is geographic information system -based ("GIS") and calculates drive times by actual street is networks and posted speed limits. A March 1, 2017 study by the National Association of Convenience Stores ("NACS") on how consumers behave at the pump (See Appendix A) shows that consumers are attracted to convenience store/fuel station facilities based on a number of factors including: • Price • Location Convenience • Brand • Ease of ingress/egress As most consumers of a convenience store/fuel station facility are drawn to that facility based primarily on the four factors noted above, it would stand to reason that an immediate market area would include driving within 5 -minutes to such a facility to obtain fuel. Most consumers would be fueling as a secondary action while driving for other reasons such as going to the grocery store or traveling to and from work. The above factors indicate that a convenience store/fuel facility market analysis would encompass a 5 -minute drive time market area ("Market Area"). Figure 1.1.1 depicts the Market Area for the Project. Figure 1.1.1 Source: ESRI ArcGIS Business Analyst Mapping System The Market Area configuration will change over time as growth occurs in the area and new roads with new residences are developed. That is important to note when the Market Area demographic detail is reviewed over the next five years in the next section. 1.2 Market Area Demographic Detail In order to determine the convenience store/fuel station facility demand, a demographic profile of the Market Area is required. Table 1.2.1 shows the demographic profile of the population that lives within the Market Area of the subject site. • 1� u 3 0 • Table 1.2.1 Gesri- and Income Profile Future WAWA Gas StaWn Prepared by EVI 4903 T Traii Ea", WAPW, FIOMD' 34113 Dflve -nrm OW: 0-5 o*wU r"lus xwn--v CU." '"116 260 POPLAW- 17,439 18.145 Hou446o1's'7,482 7.7" Fanillies 4,423 4,509 Awn" Hou"how 51m 2.25 2.24 0.- Ocwpw M -i.9 Lmft $1699 5.593 Renbor 00thipliod NWIM9 tWis I'M 2,156 M.As. Age 52.7 55.8 Tftmft 3016 - 3021 AMWO tglWl Aawa Steft PeP.ud- 0.91% 1-29% HOLMeholit, fwwlm 01% 2% Owner Ms 0.97% 1-09% M*aan H.0 hwdIftooft 2.53% 2.52% 2016 hasimelowds ft Ira". Aaantot P*tM* aSI5,000 767 9.9% $151000 - $93 11.3% :�K"9 $25,000 - 34.9" 1,176 15-116 $351w,- $4919" 1,112 14.6% $50,000 - S74.999 1,713 22.1% #75,000 - $9919" 12 1% .100;004-$149,999 666 0.6% ,;LW,DDD _ *199,999 242 3.1% $200,000+ 216 28% 14011n. H6.4hOd lr4X $MIM Awabloo H%*Ohow tr9ofte "41637 Par Cap" lnc» . $29,649 QWW* 2010 2014 #"Wwd- by A** ftnow Fwoont NOrAW Patent 0-4 $16 4-6% M 42% 5-9 7% 4-5% M 43% 10-14 702 4.0% 750 4.1% 15-19 705 4.5% 684 3-01A 20-24 758 4.3% 7% 4.4% 25-34 1,f89 9.6% 1,698 9A% 35 - 44 • 1,745 9-9% 1,587 31% 45-54 1,953 11.1% 1,657 10-M 55-E4 2,273 lzgia 2,379 13A% SS -74 2,770 is.?% 3,097 17.1% 75-64 2,381 13-5% 2,500 119% 85+ 960 5,4% 1,271 7.0% cmum 22110 3016 Ram am "hakft *U"*W Pqrm* NUWOW Pennant White Abft 14,382 814% 14,545 603%B160L Al� 1.634 9.3% i:wfi 10.0% A,nfti0.3%- IMN. A10- 57 .. fin 03% Asian Alan 157 0-9% X82 14% Padlic 15J-0st Alone 9 0.0% 13 OA% Some OVw Rat* Aficir* 1,065 6.2% I'M 6.4% Two 6w mom Races 346 1.8% 355 2-0% HmvwMk Olvin (Any Ra-) 4-3A7 24.6% 4,653 25.6% IIaIL I- is P-ai r, - .. S- fi3.5- l Bros 2 -, C- 2010 Sn'v,.rw, f . I- em ft- ?. 2016 Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau In 2016, the population for the Market Area is 18,145 and the number of households is 7,745. The majority of household incomes range from $25,000 to $75,000 and the median household income of the Market Area is $48,355. The average household income for this market area is $64,637. Table 1.2.2 shows the workforce makeup of the Market Area. The workforce • makes up 35% of the total market area population and will be significant contributors to the product sales of the convenience store/fuel station. And the majority of the workforce is in the services industry and is white collar in occupation. Table 1.2.2 Oesri- Market - Future WAWA Gas Station Prepared by Esn 4935 Rattlesnake Hammock.. Rd, Naples, Florida, 34113 Drive Time Bands: 0-5 minute radii 2016 Employed Population 1b+ by Industry Total Agriculture/Mining Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation/Utilities Information Finance/Insurance/Real Estate Services Public Administration 2016 Empio' Jed Population 16+ by Occupation Total White Collar Rtanagemeht/Busi ness/Financial Professional Sales Administrative Support Services Blue Collar Farming/Forestry/Fishing Construction/Extraction Installation/Mai ntena nce/Repair Production Trans portationJMaterial Mowing Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau 2.0 MARKET ANALYSIS 2.1 Market Area Demand 0 - 5 minute 6,361 1.4% 7.9% 3.2% 1.3% 21.6% 2.90% 1.6% 6.0% 50.4% 3.9% 6,363 50.4% 8.9% 12.7% 19.0% 9.9% 31.3°: 18.3% 0.8% 3.9% • 4.5% 3.4% 5.7% The Consultant next determined the market area demand for gasoline in 2016 and then over a 5 -year period to 2021 in order to calculate the future demand for gasoline coming from the Market Area. Table 2.1.1 shows that the market area's 2016 population is 18,135 and the household count is 7,748 as taken from Table 1.2.1 above, which equates to the 2.34 persons per household. Table 2.1.1 Population Persons Per Household 18,135 2.34 Households 7,748 Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau • In order to determine the 2021 population for the same Market Area, the Consultant then utilized the population projections for the South Naples area from Collier County's 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Report to calculate the forecasted growth percentage between 2016 and 2021 in the area where the Project is located. Table 2.1.2 shows that the South Naples area is projected to increase by 24.96% between 2016 and 2021. Table 2.1.2 Year South Naples Population 2017 34,443 2022 43,040 8,597 Growth Rate: 24.96% Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section 2015 AUIR. (See Appendix 6) The growth rate for the South Naples area is expected to increase significantly and exceed the overall county growth rate over the next 5 years as development reaches maturity along the coastal urban area and moves southeast along the Tamiami Trail East corridor. • The Consultant then used the 24.96% growth rate to calculate the future population for the Market Area as shown in Table 2.1.3. Table 2.1.3 2016 2021 Population 18,135 22,674 Persons Per Household 2.34 2.34 Households 7,748 9,682 Source: ESRI, Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section 2015 AUIR There are many real estate projects currently under development along the southern border of Tamiami Trail East in the Market Area and more are in the planning stages. This future growth will become a part of the Market Area and will alter its shape. It is in this area where the majority of the Market Area's future growth will take place. 2.2 The next step in calculating the demand for gasoline from the Market Area is to • determine the number of gallons consumed annually in the Market Area. The Consultant utilized the U.S. Census population data for the Market Area and combined it with the U.S. Census automotive data (Appendix C) and the Market Area average price to calculate the Market Area's annual consumption of gasoline. Table 2.1.4 shows the calculation. The Consultant made the same calculation for both 2016 and 2021. Table 2.1.4 2016 2021 Population 18,145 22,674 Households 7,748 9,682 Average Amount spent per Household $2,533.78 $2,533.78 Total Amount Spent in market area $19,631,727.44 $24,531,822.11 Average gasoline price per gallon: $2.47 $2.47 Gallons Consumed Annually in Market Area: 7,948,068 9,931,912 Demand Increase from 2016 to 2021: 24.96% Source: ESRI, Automotive Aftermarket Expenditures, Consultant Field Study (Appendix D) • The annual gasoline gallons consumed in the Market Area will increase 24.96% from 2016 to 2021 based on the forecasted population growth increase derived from the Collier County 2015 AUIR Report (Appendix B). Market Area Supply The Consultant then used the same Market Area drive time to determine the number of competitive gas stations located within the boundaries of the Market Area. Figure 2.2.1 shows the competitive gas stations in red as they geographically relate to the Project location (blue push pin). 7 0 C Figure 2.2.1 8 There are nine (9) gas stations within the Market Area boundary and all are • convenience store/fuel stations. The list of the competitive stations, their makeup and photos are located in Appendix D. The Consultant then utilized NACS data to examine the supply side of the competition in the Market Area. The NACS 2015 Fuel Report (Appendix E, Page 30) points out that big box mass merchandise stores sell 278,000 gallons of gasoline per month and that amount is more than half of the amount sold by convenience store/fuel station locations. Based on that statistic, the Consultant used 270,000 gallons as a base amount and used 50% of that amount as the average amount of gallons sold per month at a convenience store/fuel station location. There was no state, regional or local data available. From that point, the Consultant calculated the 9 -station Market Area gallons sold during the weekday for a week in order to add in the Project's contribution to the Market Area supply based on the Project's traffic study. Table 2.2.1 shows that calculation. Table 2.2.1 Station Gallons per Month: 135,000 Station Gallons per week: 33,750 Station Gallons for 5 weekdays: 24,107 Stations: 9 Market Area Gallons per 5 -day week: 216,964 • 8 The Project's contribution was added to the Market Area total so that the • number of cars per 5 -day week could be determined. Table 2.2.2 shows that calculation. Table 2.2.2 Market Area Gallons per 5 -day week: 216,964 Project Contribution per 5 -day week: 24,107 Market Area Gallons per 5 -day week with Project: 241,071 The next calculation is to convert the gallons per 5 -day week to cars purchasing those gallons in order to compare to the cars per 5 -day week as calculated by the Project traffic study that will purchase fuel at the Project. Table 2.2.3 shows that calculation. Table 2.2.3 Market Area Gallons per 5 -day week with Project: 241,071 Gallons per car per week: 14.02* Cars per 5 -day week in Market Area: 17,196 `Source: NACS National Association of Convenience Stores - 2015 Retail Fuels Report (Appendix E, Page 6). 729 gallons per year divided by 52 weeks. The number of cars per 5 -day week for the Project is the next calculation needed to compare the Project's contribution to the supply. Using the Project's traffic study (Appendix F) and a study performed by C -Store Shopper Insights (Appendix G), the Consultant determined that 3,767 cars will be purchasing gasoline at the Project's fuel stations over a 5 -weekday period. Table 2.2.4 shows that calculation. Table 2.2.4 Cars buying Gasoline at the Project during 5 -Weekday period Weekday Per hour am (4 hours) Weekday Per hour pm (4 hours) Total Cars in per weekday: Per hour Total Cars in 122 488 151 604 1,092 C -Store data: 69% cars in for gas: 69.00% 753 Project cars buying gas over 5 -weekdays: 3,767 Source: Wawa Traffic Study (Appendix F), page 7. C -Store Shopper Insights, Page 1 (Appendix G) • 9 • • On a side note, the average daily traffic along Tamiami Trail East is 14,956 and 9,636 along Rattlesnake Hammock Road for a total of 24,592 trips according to the Project's Traffic Study. The Project will capture 3.06% of the overall traffic passing by the Project for gas. The Project's percentage of contribution to the Market Area supply is the last calculation. Table 2.2.5 shows that the Project will contribute 3,767 fuel purchasers to the Market Area, equating to a Market Area supply increase of 21.91% Table 2.2.5 Market Area cars per 5 -weekdays including Project (from Table 2.2.3): 17,196 Project cars per 5 -weekdays (from Table 2.2.4): 3,767 Project percent increase of Market Area Supply: 21.91% 2.3 Supply — Demand Analysis The final step in the Market Study supply -demand analysis is to put the supply and demand calculations together in order to determine the oversupply or undersupply of gasoline in the Market Area with the addition of the Project. Table 2.3.1 shows that over the next five years there will be a 23.47% deficit supply of gasoline to serve the Market Area over the next five (five (5) years. • A general economic principal states that all markets are efficient and that supply is for the most part generated as demand dictates. It is a rare economic situation where supply generates demand. Basic economic principals have shown that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the ultimate lack of available fuel station choices creates an impediment to the market functioning properly. The general economic principal stated above would indicate that fuel station supply will be added to the Market Area in order to equalize the demand side of the Market Area's supply/demand equation. The Project will increase the Market Area's supply side by 21.91% thus stabilizing the Market Area's supply/demand equation for the next five (5) years. There will still be a 1.56% supply deficit in the next five (5) years even with the Project addition to the supply. Table 2.3.1 Market Area Growth (Table 2.1.4) 23.47% Project percent of market (Table2.2.5) 21.91% Market Area 5 -year supply - surplus/(deficit) (1.56%) 0 10 The addition of the Project will not only satisfy the increased demand over the • next five (5) years, it will also keep gasoline prices reasonable by absorbing a majority of the five (5) year projected demand increase and not constraining the gasoline supply and the Project will compensate for properties along the Market Area corridor that may not be developed as convenience store/fuel stations due to being unavailable for sale or subject to other development constraints. And the Project will be new to the market in terms of construction and exterior ambiance thus providing an upgrade to the East Trail Development Corridor and potentially force competitors to upgrade their exterior and interior appearances. 3.0 ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT While the Project supports the Market Area's projected increased gasoline demand and at the same time not over increase the Market Area's gasoline supply as noted previously in this analysis, it is vital to consider the positive economic impacts the Project will have not only on the Market Area but Collier County in general. Economic impacts include job creation, increased county property taxes and county gas tax contribution. The Consultant used the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Input- • Output Modeling System ("RIMS II") (Appendix H) to estimate the number of permanent and indirect jobs along with the output/sales that the Project will generate in the Market Area. The Project is estimated to create 22 permanent jobs across various job types including full time management to customer service associates. The Project is estimated to create 11 indirect jobs. The annual total output/sales from the Project is estimated at $2.5 -million. Table 3.1.1 Completion Permanent Jobs: 22 Indirect Jobs: 11 Total Jobs: 33 Annual Earnings: $827,804 Annual Total Output/Sales: $2,507,021 'Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Input- Output Modeling System Multipliers 11 • • The following Project data was used to calculate the Project's impact on County property tax and collections. Table 3.1.2 Building SF: 5,943 Site in Acres: 1.64 Property Value*: $2,000,000 *-Comparison of nearby like properties in the County. Source: Developer, Collier County Property Appraiser and Consultant Base on the above data in Table 3.1.2, the Project is estimated to generate just over $8,000 in annual property taxes to the County. Table 3.1.3 County Property Taxes Millage Rate: Unincorporated Millage Rate: Total Millage Rate: • Property Taxable Value (PTV): PTV/1,000 County Ad Valorem Tax: 3.3642 0.6721 4.0363 $2,000,000 $2,000 $8,072.60 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) 0 12 Finally, utilizing the gallons sold per week per a typical convenience store/fuel • station site, the Consultant determined that the Project's estimated contribution to the county's gas tax fund would exceed $225,000 annually. Table 3.1.4 County Gas Tax Calculations Local Option 6 cent Gas Tax / Gallon $0.06 Local Option 5 cent Gas Tax/Gallon $0.05 County Fuel Tax $0.01 Ninth Cent Voted Gas Tax / Gallon $0.01 Total Gas Tax per Gallon $0.13 Gas Tax Percent: $0.13 Average Annual Gallons Sold Week: 33,750 Weeks: 52 Average Annual Gallons Sold: 1,755,000 Gas Taxes Collected: $228,150.00 Source: Florida Department of Revenue, 2017 Fuel Tax Rates (Appendix 1) The Consultant was unable to calculate the sales tax on sales emanating from • the convenience store sales. Wawa is a privately held company. Therefore their internal sales data is proprietary and was unavailable to the Consultant to calculate the positive consumer sales tax impact the Project will have on the County. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 4.1 The Consultant used all of the data and analysis in the previous sections to determine the total supply and demand for gasoline sales in the Project's market area for the next five years. From there, the Consultant then determined the Project's impact on the Market Area in terms of the Market Area's percent of demand growth versus the Market Area's percent of supply increase with the addition of the Project's supply. The results show compellingly that the addition of the Project to the Market Area will not adversely affect the balance of gasoline supply while addressing the demand coming from the future growth and making significant economic contributions to Collier County. 13 0 • The Market Area is currently assumed to be in equilibrium as economic studies have shown that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the future supply will be developed as the market grows and diversifies. The Project will help address the demand coming to the Market Area over the next five years. Based on the analysis, there will be even more of a gasoline supply need for the Market Area over the next five (5) years and beyond even with the addition of the Project. There are other extenuating economic factors that need to be considered whey reviewing the potential of the Project's contribution to the local Market Area and Collier County. The Project is estimated to create 22 permanent jobs across various job types including full time management to customer service associates. The Project is estimated to create 11 indirect jobs. The annual total output/sales from the Project is estimated at $2.5 -million. Estimates also show that the Project should contribute over $8,000 annually in county property taxes and over $225,000 in gasoline taxes annually to the county. The Wawa brand has a very strong following in the Mid -Atlantic states. Pennsylvania has the most Wawa stations followed by Florida. They are looking to create a foothold in Southwest Florida and Collier County in particular. Their gas prices are competitive and the "Wawa Effect" has been known to lower overall gas prices in the markets they enter (See Appendix J). They have a very compelling corporate story (See Appendix K) and are also well known not only for their favorable gas prices but outstanding convenience products including freshly made sandwiches. Consumers look highly upon the Wawa brand as studies have shown (See Appendix L). In addition, Wawa is on the cutting edge of convenience store concepts as they are one of the pioneers of providing a variety of quality hot fast foods and sandwiches made to order on site, which favorably competes with the fast food chains. They also provide a variety of additional items such as packaged drinks and snacks that fast food outlets don't provide (See Appendix M). All the statistics, studies and press clippings point to the fact that the Wawa brand will be a very favorable addition to the South Trail area of Collier County. 0 14 APPENDIX A • • 15 • How Consumers Behave at the Pump I NACS Online — Your Business — ... http://www.nacsonline.com/YourBusiness/Fue]sCenter/Basics/Articles/P... Ask NACS Conexxus Terms of Use Advertise 1600 Duke Street About NACS Fuels Institute Privacy Policy For Suppliers Alexandria, Va 22314 • Foundation Related Glossary Copyright © 2017 NACS Associations THE ASSOCIATION FOR CONVENIENCE & FUEL RETAILING NACS Online About Basics Articles Multimedia News Research Basics / Articles / How Consumers Behave at the Pump HOW CONSUMERS BEHAVE AT THE PUMP I Am Looking For: Search this site... P Nearly40 million Americans fill up their vehicles every day. Haw they drive, considergas prices and determine whether they go inside the store has a profound impact on convenience stores. RELATED ARTICLES By NACS Published: 3/1/2017 10 What Consumers Say About Tags: Consumers; Pay at the Pump Fueling By NACS Read More Nearly 40 million Americans fill up their vehicles every day. How they drive, consider gas prices and determine whether to shop inside a convenience store for food, snacks and beverages has a f� Are You Average? profound impact on the retail channel that sells 80% of the fuel purchased in the United States. Let's By NACS Read More look at some of the broad characteristics of how consumers buy gas and examine how convenience retailers can keep them coming back. NACS has surveyed consumers about their perceptions related to gas prices since 2007 and has conducted monthly consumer sentiment surveys since 2013. NACS commissioned Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates LLC to conduct 1,114 online interviews with adult Americans on January 3-6, 2017. The margin of error for the entire sample is +/- 2.95% at the 95% confidence interval and higher for subgroups. Below are the questions and overall responses. Consumer Behavior at the Pump Understanding how consumers feel about gasoline prices can help convenience retailers execute their marketing strategies. It's also important to determine how consumers buy gas, which reveals some interesting variations. Filling Up the Tank Consumers are more likely to buy gas during the evening rush than the morning daypart (36% vs. 22%), likely because of morning time pressures. But these time pressures vary by demographic. Those most likely to purchase fuel in the morning are consumers age 34-49 who generally face time pressures related to organizing family activities, etc. There may be an opportunity to focus marketing on this segment to encourage more breakfast items. Meanwhile, those age 50 and older are most likely to purchase gas mid-day, outside of rush hours. A promotional campaign around slowing down and enjoying a snack or meal inside the store might appeal to this demographic. Q: What time of the day do you often purchase gas? Age Gas Consumers 2017 18-34 35-49 50+ • Morning, or roughly 6 am to 10 am 22 19 28 21 Mid-day, or roughly 10 am to 3 pm 32 27 25 41 Survey Says... By NACS Magazine Read More 1 of 6 4/8/2017 11:10 AM In particular, we examine: • • Consumer behavior at the pump • What retailers can do to change consumer behavior • Overall driving habits NACS has surveyed consumers about their perceptions related to gas prices since 2007 and has conducted monthly consumer sentiment surveys since 2013. NACS commissioned Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates LLC to conduct 1,114 online interviews with adult Americans on January 3-6, 2017. The margin of error for the entire sample is +/- 2.95% at the 95% confidence interval and higher for subgroups. Below are the questions and overall responses. Consumer Behavior at the Pump Understanding how consumers feel about gasoline prices can help convenience retailers execute their marketing strategies. It's also important to determine how consumers buy gas, which reveals some interesting variations. Filling Up the Tank Consumers are more likely to buy gas during the evening rush than the morning daypart (36% vs. 22%), likely because of morning time pressures. But these time pressures vary by demographic. Those most likely to purchase fuel in the morning are consumers age 34-49 who generally face time pressures related to organizing family activities, etc. There may be an opportunity to focus marketing on this segment to encourage more breakfast items. Meanwhile, those age 50 and older are most likely to purchase gas mid-day, outside of rush hours. A promotional campaign around slowing down and enjoying a snack or meal inside the store might appeal to this demographic. Q: What time of the day do you often purchase gas? Age Gas Consumers 2017 18-34 35-49 50+ • Morning, or roughly 6 am to 10 am 22 19 28 21 Mid-day, or roughly 10 am to 3 pm 32 27 25 41 Survey Says... By NACS Magazine Read More 1 of 6 4/8/2017 11:10 AM How Consumers Behave at the Pump I NACS Online — Your Business — ... http://www.nacsonline.com/YourBusiness/FuelsCenterBasics/Articles/P... Afternoon, or roughly 3 pm to 7 pm 36 41 37 32 Night, or roughly 7 pm to midnight 9 13 10 6 Overnight, or roughly midnight to 6 am 1 0 1 0 • Most fueling sites offer three octane grades: regular (usually 87 octane), mid -grade (usually 89 octane), and premium (usually 92 or 93 octane). Regular octane is the dominant fuel, while those who buy higher -octane fuels are likely doing so because their vehicle requires it. There are some variations by age; younger consumers are the least interested in mid -grade as a fueling option. Q: What octane grade do you typically purchase for the vehicle you most commonly drive? Gender Age (%) Gas Consumers 2017 M F 18-34 35-49 50+ Regular 82 80 84 82 78 86 Mid -grade 8 10 7 5 11 5 Premium 8 10 7 11 10 5 Other 1 0 1 0 1 1 Don't know 0 0 1 1 0 0 Fully three quarters of consumers pay by plastic (73%). The percentage of consumers who pay by plastic has increased by 9 percentage points between 2009 and 2017. In reviewing subcategories, debit cards are most used by females (41%) and those age 18-34 (45%). Credit cards are most popular with those age 50 and older (47%). Q: Which payment method do you typically use to purchase gas? Shopping on Price The rise of mobile commerce, apps and Orice-checking websites make it easier for consumers to shop for deals and "steals" oil everything from appliances to new shoes, a mentality that also carries over to gasoline. Sinipty put, no matterwhat the price per gallon is, consumers want to find the t5est price they can. Approximately two.in;)h'r'ee corl5umers-haze consistently-sfiopped�ori price, whether gag"vias as low as $1.62 per gallon at the start of 2009, oras high as $3.28 per gallon at the start of 2013. However, a focus on price is diminishing and has fallen 1i} percentage points in just two years. Location has grown more important to consumers, as well as the in-store food offer. The price per gallon is least important to those who over the past 30 days whobought a sandwich at a placewhere they also purchased gas (56%). Q When buying gas,;which of the following factors is important to you? Track 't%) Gas Consumers 2017 Track 2012 2009 Price "61 64 71 66 71 63 70 (%) Gas Consumers 2017 20 19 Brand: 8 9 ;t3 8 8 8 9 Ease of entrance or exit 4 6 13 4 2 6 - �Other 1 1 i 1 1 2 1 So how do price -sensitive consumers shop by price? The traditional gas price sign remains the 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2009 Cash 26 28 23 27 27 33 35 Credit 36 34 40 37 35 41 37 Debit 37 38 38 36 37 24 27 Total debit and credit 73 72 78 73 72 65 64 Shopping on Price The rise of mobile commerce, apps and Orice-checking websites make it easier for consumers to shop for deals and "steals" oil everything from appliances to new shoes, a mentality that also carries over to gasoline. Sinipty put, no matterwhat the price per gallon is, consumers want to find the t5est price they can. Approximately two.in;)h'r'ee corl5umers-haze consistently-sfiopped�ori price, whether gag"vias as low as $1.62 per gallon at the start of 2009, oras high as $3.28 per gallon at the start of 2013. However, a focus on price is diminishing and has fallen 1i} percentage points in just two years. Location has grown more important to consumers, as well as the in-store food offer. The price per gallon is least important to those who over the past 30 days whobought a sandwich at a placewhere they also purchased gas (56%). Q When buying gas,;which of the following factors is important to you? Track 't%) Gas Consumers 2017 2016 2015 2014 201$ 2012 2009 Price "61 64 71 66 71 63 70 Location of store/station 25 20 18 20 18 20 19 Brand: 8 9 ;t3 8 8 8 9 Ease of entrance or exit 4 6 13 4 2 6 - �Other 1 1 i 1 1 2 1 So how do price -sensitive consumers shop by price? The traditional gas price sign remains the most common method, particularly among drivers during the morning rush (65%). Loyalty cards are a second choice and are used by one in seven (16%) price -sensitive consumers. 0 • 2 of 6 4/8/2017 11:10 AM • APPENDIX B • • 17 Plamniog Community April COLLIER COUNTY PERMANENT POPULATION ESTIMATES and PROJECTIONS a . sP+' a � Sy Pla,M GmMWfy 4nd City .ewes e*males as Mb. esatatas eslalMla elft tp I projedimts prpjeeons pmjdtlars PTs pladers pins Prolusions pml.Ws Piolacaers pa*(Ons M-6- prVaora pmjectam prone M pmjecd- PMj dlons Plnaai.v f'amerunfro 261e) Vita 2611 11112. 2011 2014 21115 2016 1017 2019 2019 211711 21121 2022 21113 2024 2lni 22026 2027 7029 20:9 2030 NN - North Naples 47,657 55,041 65,169 55,716 56,152 56,362 56,711 57,066 $7,407 57,765 58,129 58,501 58,823 59,151 59,484 59,823 60,166 60,464 60,766 61,071 61,381 61,696 5N -South Naples 21,610 28,689 29,029 29,950 30,687 31,071 32,767 34,443 36,151 37,891 39,665 41,472 43,040 44,634 46,264 47,900 49,572 51,019 52,486 53,973 55,481 57,010 CN • Central Naples 18,323 18,846 18,867 18,967 19,022 19,096 19,183 14,269 19,357 19,446 19538 19,631 19,711 19,793 19,876 19,961 20,047 20,921 20,197 20,273 20,351 20,429 EN -East Naples 24,385 22,320 22 323 22355 22,382 22,399 22,648 22,894 23,164 23,400 23,660 23,925 24,156 24,390 24,627 24,869 25,116 25,327 25,542 25,761 25,982 26,206 GG -Golden Gate 35,325 44,925 45,000 45,283 45,418 45,490 45,504 45,519 45,633 45.548 45,563 45,678 45,592 45,605 46,619 45,633 45,647 65,659 45,672 45,684 45,697 45,710 UE - Urban Estates 16,713 38,658 38,830 39,484 40,084 40,876 42,137 43,382 44,651 4944 47,262 48,604 49,770 $0,954 52,157 53,380 64,623 55,698 56,788 57,893 89,013 60,148 RE • Rural Estates 18,815 34,739 34,780 34,941 35,089 35,193 35,446 35,695 35,950 36,209 36,473 36,742 36,976 31,2113 37,464 37,699 37,948 38,164 38,382 38,604 38,828 39,056 M - Marco 1,350 1,219 1,222 1,224 1,227 1,299 1,335 1,370 1,406 1,443 1,481 1,619 1,662 1,586 1,621 1,555 1,691 1,722 1,763 1,784 1,816 1,849 RF- Royal Eakapalm 7,811 11,797 12,205 13,129 13,859 14,392 15,211 16,020 16,84S 17,686 18,541 19,414 20,171 20,940 21,722 22,517 23,325 24,023 24,731 25,449 26,177 26,915 C -Corkscrew 1,019 4,550 5,375 7,369 6,239 8,989 10,200 11,396 12,615 13,868 15,124 16,414 17,533 18,671 19,827 21,002 22,196 23,229 24,276 4338 26,414 27,605 I - Immokalee 21,845 24,154 24,463 24,685 24,805 24,832 24,896 24,959 25,023 25,088 25,155 25,223 25,282 25,342 25,403 25,465 25,528 25,582 25,639 25,694 25,750 25,808 BC - Big Cypress 190 233 233 231 239 1 240 2401 241 242 1 2431 2441 245 246 247 248 2491 2491 250 251 252 253 253 UninorporateASUjM 215,043 285,170 2B7,485 293,343 297,103 300,2371 306,276 312,243 318,324 324,520 330,834 337,268 342,851 348,525 354,292 360,151 366,107 371,257 376,480 381,774 387,142 392,584 NIMMI s esanalas es9males e0maks rstanads esumeus Feel -dim" P"dions pmodons projection p,olimiju is praJaztions PmjK" projerhom pere"m Miections projections; projectims projeams proiectie s pmlvaiions isno ons Cfrler 2w 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2013 2016 2017 2019 2014 2020 2021 2022 2023 1024 1025 2026 1027 2029 2029 2030 Everglades City 1 479 400 4061 401 4051 409 4121 4151 4181 4211 425 1 4281 4311 4111 437 I 441 444 1 4411 4611 4541 458 481 Manor Island 1 14,8791 16,413 16,443 1 1fi,521 1 16,5561 16,607 16,7`161 16,898 16,920 1 11,0211 17,1231 17,225 1 '11,3181 17,4111 17,504 17,597 Ll7,690 1 17,774 1 17,859 1 17,943 18,028 18,112 Naples 1 20,9761 19,5371 19,451 I 19,584 1 19,S951 19,530 19,7%1 20,065 1 20,3381 20,6151 20,8951 21,1791 21,467 1 21,7591 22,065 1 22,355 1 22,8591 22,9681 23,2B0 I 23,S971 23,9181 24,243 IncorprraredSUM 36,334 36,350 36,300 36,506 36,560 36,5461 36,924 37,298 37,676 38,051 38,443 38,832 39,216 39,605 39,997 40,393 40,793 41,189 41,690 41,994 42,403 42,816 I COUNTYWIDE TOTAL 1 251,3771 321,520 j 323,7851 329,8491 333,6631 336,783 j 343,200 j 349,541 1 356,0001 362,5781 369,277 1 375,1001 382,0681 388,1301 394,288 1 400,544 1 406,9001 412,4471 418,0691 423,7681 429,545 i 435,4001 Rata; l) 2000 and 2010 Naples, Muco Is1aM, Everglades City, Ubi=TpoT ed County mdCo mty wide totalsase esbmetas fwmtheUS. Ckmus Bateau, Census 2000 and Cennu:2010 Redioricting Data (Public Law 94-171).. 2) =And 2010 Platmu,g Community emnates am based upmCouoty %amlvtgstaRretiew of 2000 ud 2010 Census rmpsa>d papdation data. 3) Matto Island projections were provided by the city's PI staff, m 5 -year iucm ncrits. In-bemtm years are straighdme pwjeetotisp Vmd by CAmty Plaacing slif .. 4) Naples pn jectems wem prepared by County staffbawd upon 2030 projection provided by a. sty's Flaming staff in 201M, 5J Everglades Cityprojectienswero pralored by Caumy PLveingsteff 6)2015-2030Comm-aidetotah mprojeu6ousbaseduponBEERMediumRangagrowthalesbetwean2015.2020,2A20-2025and2025-2030, pee B88R8UBetinA71,A4)ti12015. 7) %amiug.Cammmdly pmjadions wme ptepated by County Plarmhtg staff using Cettiiiam of Oceup atiq 611711 k pesovaperdgal[sug vidtrafios derived from 2000 Cees. glPluming Cmtmnmityprojections dR not rd7ea pmjeded buildmt-popdefim figures, as prepared in 1994ud 2005. 9) 3eme of the Tota)smpy um egiel the sum of the nAwdual figures due to toundima Prepared 8y Collier Country Corapredemilee Planning Section May 26, 2011 G:ICaEa*i-ICmnprehensiro 4l1IUIR-I'1915AWn& l- Popula1m, Cmr**e Da W-04pop astand puny MKT 15 AUIR • 0 bY4w&vs • APPENDIX C • • 18 • Oesn" Automotive AftermarketExpenditures Future WAWA Gas Station Prepared by Esri 4935 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd, Naples, Florida, 34113 %t Drive Time Band: 0 - 5 minute radius Demographic Summary 2016 2021 Population 18,145 18,989 Households 7,748 8,147 Families 4,509 4,698 Median Age 55.8 58.4 Median Household Income $48,355 $54,800 Transportation - Local Payments on Vehicles excluding Leases Gasoline and Motor Oil Gasoline Diesel Fuel Motor Oil Other Vehicle Expenses Vehicle Maintenance & Repairs Vehicle Coolant/Brake/Transmission Fluids Tire Purchase/ Replacement Vehicle Parts/Equipment/Accessories Vehicle Accessories including Labor Vehicle Cleaning Services including Car Washes Miscellaneous Auto Repair/Servicing Vehicle Body Work & Painting Vehicle or Engine Repairs Vehicle Motor Tune-up Lube/Oil Change & Oil Filters Vehicle Front End Alignment/Wheel Balance & Rotation Vehicle Shock Absorber Replacement Tire Repair and Other Repair Work Auto Repair Service Policy Vehicle Insurance Rental of Vehicles excluding Trips Leased Vehicles Basic Lease Charge for Cars/Trucks Car/Truck Lease Fees & Down Payments Vehicle Pers Property Taxes/State & Local Registr Fees Driver's License Fees Vehicle Inspection Fees Parking Fees & Tolls excluding Trips Parking Fees excluding Residence (Not on Trips) Tolls/Electronic Toll Passes excluding Trips Towing Charges Auto Service Clubs & GPS Services Spending Potential Average Amount Index Spent Total 83 $1,736.92 $13,457,658 84 $2,533.78 $19,631,727 86 $48.01 $371,995 85 $13.30 $103,085 87 $896.70 $6,947,653 80 $6.31 $48,896 85 $137.28 $1,063,665 86 $56.47 $437,564 103 $12.11 $93,828 90 $18.63 $144,325 91 $112.83 $874,189 88 $30.54 $236,641 85 $186.07 $1,441,662 94 $61.23 $474,390 87 $90.82 $703, 18 80 $26.63 $206, 86 $13.57 $105,153 84 $120.86 $936,429 88 $23.35 $180,924 87 $975.49 $7,558,091 93 $32.88 $254,759 78 $236.81 $1,834,794 78 $210.77 $1,633,052 83 $26.04 $201,742 86 $141.04 $1,092,780 80 $10.39 $80,523 85 $11.98 $92,810 75 $66.80 $517,600 72 $33.12 $256,578 78 $33.69 $261,023 85 $4.72 $36,577 97 $26.24 $203,325 Data Note: The Spending Potential Index (SPI) is household -based, and represents the amount spent for a product or service relative to a national average of 100. • Source: Esri forecasts for 2016 and 2021; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2013 and 2014 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. April 24, 2017 • APPENDIX D • 20 FACILITY—NAME S ADDRESS STATUS Chevron 3396 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN Sunoco 4716 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN Mobil 11466 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN Sunoco 11339 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN Citgo 11225 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN Marathon 11163 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN Coastal 9995 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN 7-11 4831 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN Speedway 4171 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN CONVENIENCE STORE STATIONS PUMPS 87 OCTANE 89 OCTANE 93 OCTANE YES 4 8 2.49 2.79 2.99 YES 6 12 2.43 2.83 3.13 YES 4 8 2.49 3.08 3.28 YES 4 8 2.49 2.89 3.09 YES 2 4 2.49 2.89 3.09 YES 3 6 2.39 2.79 2.99 YES 6 12 2.48 2.71 2.99 YES 4 8 2.49 2.74 2.99 YES 7 14 2.45 2.74 2.99 Totals and Averages 40 80 $2.47 $2.83 $3.06 • • COMPETITIVE CONVENIENCE STORE/FUEL STATIONS IN MARKET AREA • • Chevron 3396 Tamiami Trail East 4 Stations — 8 pumps 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.49 $2.79 $2.99 Sunoco 4716 Tamiami Trail East 6 Stations — 12 pumps 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.43 $2.83 $3.13 E 0 • • Mobil 11466 Tamiami Trail East 4 Stations — 8 pumps 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.49 $3.08 $3.28 Sunoco 11339 Tamiami Trail East 4 Stations — 8 pumps 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.49 $2.89 $3.09 • • • • • Citgo 11225 Tamiami Trail East 2 Stations — 4 pumps 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.49 $2.89 $3.09 Marathon 11163 Tamiami Trail East 3 Stations — 6 pumps 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.39 $2.79 $2.99 0 • • • • Coastal 9995 Tamiami Trail East 6 Stations — 12 pumps 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.48 $2.71 $2.99 7-11 4831 Tamiami Trail East 4 Stations — 8 pumps 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.49 $2.74 $2.99 • • • • • Speedway 4171 Tamiami Trail East 7 Stations — 14 pumps 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.45 $2.74 $2.99 APPENDIX E C7 • 21 0 Over the course of a year, the average American uses: 22.27 barrels of oil (Source: CIA World Factbook) The a erage hous6h6ld buys: b,. X29ga'111onsf aach:N ear g Y (Soufbe: U.S. Energy Information, Administration) 78%of gas customers pay by credit or debit card. (Source: 2015 NACS Consumer Fuels Survey) 35% of gas customers also go inside the store (Source: 2015 NACS Consumer Fuels Survey) • 0 • Major Oil Keeps Its Brand Presence While the major oil companies are withdrawing from retail operations, their brands remain. In fact, roughly half of retail outlets sell fuel under the brand of one of the i5 largest refiner -suppliers. Virtually all of these branded loca- tions are operated by independent entrepreneurs who have signed a supply contract with a particular refiner/distributor to sell a specific brand of fuel, but these retailers do not share in the profit/loss of their suppliers. The remaining 5o% sold "unbranded" fuel. These stations often are owned by companies that have established their own fuel brand (i.e., QuikTrip, Wawa, 7 -Eleven) and purchase fuels either on the open market or via unbranded con- tracts with a refiner/distributor. Other Retail Channels Sell Fuels Convenience stores sell more than 8o% of the fuels purchased in the United States, and their dominance continues to grow. Over the past decade, the number of convenience stores selling fuels has grown by 15% (from 11o, 895 to 127,588 stores). Meanwhile, the overall number of fueling locations has dropped. There were 152995 total retail fueling sites in the United States in 2013, the last year measured by the now -defunct National Petroleum News' Market - Facts. This was a steep and steady decline since 1994, when the station count • topped zo2,800 sites. Another channel also has seen growth over the past decade: big -box grocery stores and mass merchandising stores, otherwise known as "hypermarkets." As of May 2014, the 5,236 hypermarket retail fueling sites sold an estimated 13.8% of the motor fuels (gasoline) purchased in the United States, according to Energy Analysts International. These sites sell approximately_ X78 000 gal- lops per month, more than twice the volume of a traditional fuels retailer:. is The top five hypermarkets selling fuel, by store count: • Kroger (1,220) • Walmart (999 stations, mainly Murphy USA with small mix of others; up to 20o new Murphy USA sites are due by end of 2015 per agreement) • Sam's Club (5o5) • Costco (381) • Safeway (346) (Source: Energy Analysts International) The remainder of fuels sales in the United States comes from traditional ser- vice stations without convenience operations and very low-volume fueling sites, such as at marinas. 2015 NACS Retail Fuels Report 130 APPENDIX F • 22 • ITPOICOCH planning- engineering Traffic Impact Statement Naples South Plaza Site Development Plan Amendment (SDPA) Prepared for: RWA, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Dr., Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 Phone: 239.597.0575 Collier County, FL 02/17/2017 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239.566.9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee — $ 500.00 Collier County Transportation Review Fee — Ma or Study — $1.500.00 0 Naples South Plaza — SDPA — TIS — February 2017 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. GEN s' CSO 2: No 47116 '. �.' • STATE OF '�/ Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 12 • • • Noples South Plozo—SDPA—ns—Februory2017 • Table 2A Trip Generation (Existing Conditions) -Average Weekday Table 2B Trip Generation (Proposed Conditions) - Average Weekday Proposed Development 24 Hour - PM Peak Hour Existing Development Two -Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Exit Volume Enter Exit Land Use Size 5,943 sf Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Shopping Center 90,303 sf 6,355 91 55 146 269 291 560 External Traffic External Traffic 109 10,639 203 170 373 388 407 Pass -by Traffic Pass -by Traffic (953) (23) (14) (37) (67) (73) (140) Net External Traffic Net External Traffic 5,402 68 41 109 202 218 420 Table 2B Trip Generation (Proposed Conditions) - Average Weekday Proposed Development 24 Hour Two -Way Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size AM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Convenience Market with Gasoline Pumps 5,943 sf 5,023 122 121 243 151 151 302 Shopping Center 74,654 sf 5,616 81 49 130 237 256 493 External Traffic 109 10,639 203 170 373 388 407 795 Pass -by Traffic (2,851) (81) (74) (155) (135) (139) (274) Net External Traffic 50 7,788 122 96 218 253 268 521 Table 2C Trip Generation (Total New Net External Traffic) -Average Weekday In agreement with the Collier County Traffic Impact Study (TIS) guidelines, significantly • impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 24 Hour Two -Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Volume Land Use Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Proposed Development 7,788 122 96 218 253 268 521 Existing Development 5,402 68 41 109 202 218 420 New Net External Traffic 2,386 54 55 109 51 50 101 Net Increase In agreement with the Collier County Traffic Impact Study (TIS) guidelines, significantly • impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page APPENDIX G C 23 • Fueling Sales Inside and Out I CSP Daily News http://www.cspdailynews.com/print/esp-magazine/articicVfueling-salcs in... INDUSTRY NEWS MERGERS&ACQUISITIONS FUELS DATA SPONSORED CONTENT EVENTS • severag.s Fwx1service General Mer andise Servi Sr "& tend, Ta wa MERCHANDISING MADE EASY Torches & fuel all in one place. ® for WHOLESALE PRICING Print, CSP Magazine Atlr July 2013 cusp Fueling Sales Inside and Out An exclusive peek at latest VideoMining heat -map study reveals challenge of 4„ pump -to -store conversion, opportunity of layout. � e- dlil-1, By Samantha Oiler, Senior Editor/Fuets, CSP � - More than 25 years ago, pay at the pump debuted in the United States, introducing great convenience to motorists and a big conundrum to retailers. If you enable customers to pay for fuel at the pump, how do you Today's TC persuade them to come inside the store to buy higher -margin items? _ If recent research from VideoMiningCorp. is any indication, its a challenge that fuel retailers have still not More New Engta Petroleum Mark, mastered. at the pump or prepaying [inside the store],"says Priya Baboo, executive vice president of shopper s & strategy for Video -Mining Corp., State College, Pa., which produces the annual C -Store Shopper s (CSI) Program, a research effort that documents the c -store shopping trip. This fourth iteration of the conducted in late summer 2012 and shared exclusively with CSP, included 10 chains representing 144 in 20 markets. Consider that for every 100 gasoline customers, 64 pay at the pump, and of the 64 pay only for gas and leave, according to Video Mining. Lets put aside this latter group—"it is much harder to convince someone who is just thinking of pumping gas to walk into the store, because they may be in a hurry," Baboo says—and focus solely on the opportunity presented by the others. The 36 fuel customers who walk into the store to pay are truly "low -hanging fruit, "she insists, "because in the store you have a better opportunity of converting them. But unfortunately, we're not leveraging that opportunity." How poor is that leverage? Less than a third of these customers will ultimately make an in-store purchase. Video Mining evaluates this type of c -store shopper behavior through a combination of technologies. Ceiling - mounted cameras track customers' movements through the c -store, while proprietary video -analysis software processes millions of hours of shopping trips. This data is cross-referenced with point-of-sale data to •correlate store traffic with purchasing behavior and generate insights on everything from the basics (average time spent in store, average in-store basket) to the rates at which customers shopped particular categories and made a purchase. d.of 5 4/29/17,6:25 PM APPENDIX H • • 24 • 0 • • 15 Final Demand Direct Effect RIMS If Multipliers outp. Jobs Earninas Earl Employment General Office 2.1526 21.7569 0.8055 1.7847 2.1797 Retail -Shopping Center 1.8689 24.5830 0.6171 1.7193 1.5220 Restaurant 1.9066 28.5556 0.5359 1.8993 1.4146 Hotel 1.8279 22.5109 0.5808 1.7484 1.5864 Industrial 2.1526 21.7569 0.8055 1.7847 2.1797 Warehouse 1.8744 22.1029 0.6795 1.5793 1.6269 Institutional / Governmental 2.2047 29.6172 0.7605 1.8433 1.6631 Golf Course 1.8705 23.4032 0.5810 1.7878 1.5624 Agriculture 1.6676 26.6027 0.4835 1.7184 1.3872 Housing Related 1.2340 12.9738 0.6335 - - Conslruction 2.0456 21.5918 0.7044 1.8371 1.9434 • • 15 APPENDIX • • 25 • E • Revised 2017 Florida Fuel Tax, Collection Allowance, Refund, and Pollutants Tax Rates Page Exhibit Description of Exhibit 2 A Rate Changes for 2017 2 B 2017 State Taxes, Inspection Fee, Ninth Cent, Local Option, Additional Local Option, and SCETS Fuel Taxes 3 C Tax and Collection Allowance Rates by Form and Line Item S D Local Option Tax Entitled and Not Entitled to Collection Allowance (Gasoline, Gasohol, and Fuel Grade Ethanol) 6 E Pollutants Tax Rates 6 F Refund Rates 7 G Licensed Mass Transit System Provider Credit/Refund Rate (Gasoline, Gasohol, and Fuel Grade Ethanol) 8 H Refundable Portion of Local Option and State Comprehensive Enhanced Transportation System (SCETS) Tax. This schedule is used by qualified mass transit system providers, farmers, commercial fishermen, and aviation ground support companies to determine the refund rate on gasoline (Part II of Form DR -138 and DR -160). 8 I Shared Collection Allowance Rates Florida Dept. of Revenue, 2017 Fuel Tax Rates, Page 1 Exhibit A Rate Changes for 2017 Statewide Fuel Taxes on Motor Fuel (Gasoline, Gasohol, and Fuel Grade Ethanol) Excise Sales 91h Cent Inspection Fee Local Option SCETS Total All Counties 1 0.040 0.134 0.00 1 .00125 0.06 0.074 0.30925* *- Total does not include local option taxes above the statewide minimum collected and remitted by licensed wholesalers and terminal suppliers on each sale, delivery, or consignment to retail dealers, resellers, and end users. See Exhibit B for the local option tax above the minimum on motor fuel. Statewide Fuel Taxes on Undyed Diesel Fuel " Excise Sales 9th Cent Local Option SCETS Total All Counties 0.040 0.134 0.01 0.06 0.074 0.318 Statewide Fuel Taxes on Aviation Fuel State Tax Bay All Counties .069 "..000 25 = ° New Taxes Imposed/Repealed: 1. Franklin County -'Ordinance number 2016-07 increases the levy of Local Option Gas Tax from five tents to six cents. Exhibit B 2017 State Taxes, Inspection Fee, Ninth Cent, Local Option, Additional Local Option and SCETS Motor Fuel Taxes x: Addit COUNTY,Ai ion STHt i Locate Local.CEf Fe�a O ion 4 t ' i.. MIn ""TOTAL *COUNTYI Option TAX TOTAL '3 Above POSED' p• liaiMU Alachua U-22 „;n .00125 , 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 , ,94 .; : 0.134 0.06 0.36925, ` Baker 0114 : '; : `.OQ125 ;, 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 '0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 " Bay ; 0.174 "..000 25 = ° 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 : - 0.1 4. 0.134 0.01 -" 0.31925 Bradford 0.174 0001 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 °" _4 , : 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Brevard 3 ;174 f 040i2s 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0 3 .; 0.134 0.00 0.30925;3• Broward AQ04 „ '" 0. 125 .: 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 0.134 0.06 0.36925 Calhoun AU. 0.00 0.06 0.00 0 074 yt" 134.,..w- 0.134 0.00 '0.30925' Charlotte 0.174 0. 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 SMD.19, ` ` 0.134 0.06 036925 fj Citrus 0.174 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 :0.104 0.134 0.06 0.36925:` Clay 0,12 :;00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 ;i 0.134 0.01 031925 Collier $11 94'- "11 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.134 0.06 _ Columbia 0.174 0001 5. 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 °4,.. 144`" 0.134 0.01 0.31925'' Miami -Dade 0:174 :0.00125'-' 0.01 0.06 0.03 0.074 0.174 0.134 0.04 0.34925 DeSoto 0.114 , ;: 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 ,;,; 0.194;,,:- 0.134 0.06 0:36925 Dixie '1.x. -17441'1i, 0. 25 :a' 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 51„434 "', 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Duval 0.114 ='0001, = 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 77, .13 77, 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Escambia 0.174 000125.. ` 0.01 0.06 0.04 0.074 0.184 0.134 0.05 0:35925 Flagler 0.174.,j":°'O.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 s'11 -0,144::='a 0.134 0.01 0.31925., Franklin 174= 0. 125 x 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 ; " 0_t' 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Gadsden 0_0:174'' " 0 25,.`x; 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0;14 0.134 0.00 0.30925 Gilchrist0.174 .' 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.144 0.134 0.01 0.31925 " Glades 0174 ' '' 0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 ''. r0 .. ,,; "' 0.134 0.01 -.0.31925 Gulf 0.194 „t .00is:.' 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.074 fr 0.14`' 0.134 0.01 ji4.31825 Hamilton 0.174' 0.001 ,V 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.074 0.134.. ;: 0.134 0.00 030925,re, Hardee 0.174 O.OQ125 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 :: '0.144 '` 0.134 0.06 ;03 Hendry 0;374. ., cs0.00125 0.01 0.06 0.02 0.074 0.1 ' 0.134 0.03 70.33W5 ' Hernando ' 374„ 0. 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0.194 !;;` 0.134 0.06 Q36925•.,,. Highlands :174" 0.0a', 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.074 0:1.134 ' "` 0.134 0.06 Florida Dept. of Revenue, 2017 Fuel Tax Rates, Page 2 • • • 0 APPENDIX J F-1 0 25 Is `Wawa effect' pushing gas prices down in Palm Beach County? ,., 63° tk MY http://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/business/wawa-effect-pushing-gas-pr... Is `Wawa effect' pushing gas prices down in Palm Beach County? NATION -WORLD By Susan Salisbury - Palm Beach Post Staff Writer f 19 Wawa will be selling gas for $1.99 until late Saturday. (Kevin D. ThompsonfThe Palm Beach Post) Updated: 4:27 p.m. Fnday, March 31, 20171 Posted: 4:23 p.m. Friday, March 31, 2017 Where is the cheapest gas in Palm Beach County? Since three Wawa convenience stores opened last Thursday, it's likely to be at Wawa, as well as at numerous gas stations within a few miles of those. The "Wawa effect" is in full force, but it's not known how long it will last. "It is not uncommon that when a store enters a new market, that it is hyper competitive on gas prices," said Jeff Lenard, the National Association of Convenience Stores vice president of strategic industry initiatives. RELATED: Wawa to open another Florida store this week For example, on Wednesday, regular was priced at $2.17 a gallon at the three Wawas at 3950 S. Congress Ave., and 1771 S. Congress Ave., both in Palm Springs and at 7289 Garden Road in Riviera Beach. That's well below the county's average of $2.44 a gallon, down 3 cents from a week ago, according to AAA's Fuel Gauge Report But Florida's average remains unchanged from a week ago at $2.29 a gallon. The increased competition helps explain why five gas stations in Lake Park within one to three miles of the Riviera Beach Wawa, were also selling gas at $2.17, according to GasBuddycom. Rocket Fuel, 100 N. Federal Highway, North Palm Beach, was offering regular for $2.15. SUBSCRIBE ^ W-990 CL JL LOG IN 0 • • 1 of 4 4/25/17, 8:55 AM Is' Wawa effect' pushing gas prices down in Palm Beach County? http://www.mypalmbeachpost.wm/business/wa"-effect-pushing-gas-pr... About the Author Sign up for arae ULISSURr Newsletters Went more nexst Sign up its oewleaem Is or come at his Palm Beath Pop detiwed m ywrmbm. • Reader Comments ra 2 of 4 4/25/17, 8:55 AM RB MD: Free Cone Day 2017: Here's where you can gat FREE Ice cream in Palm Beach County ARew stations near the Palm Springs Wawas dropped their prices to $2.16 a gallon, and on • Wedcesday gams was also $2.16 a lesion at Cosecs, in lantana and Royal Palm Beach and at We In Boynton Beach. Mm's Introductory $1.99 a gallon ended March 25. The price of gas is still as top much 51 parent of consumers surveyed my May slop at a pedicular station, bid 16 percent say they choose a oeling location M the pudgy of 0s toad, a national survey MACS seemed! March 29 revealed. 'The d mains on fuel are slim, and Ne Was s to gid them in the sore and intent Nem with a snack. sandwkh or drinks.' Lenard said, In the converearm store busmers, gasdlre ectourca or )0 parmned revenue dogars, but only 40 percent d profit ddlars. Lenard amid 'Sometimes, a lege chain similar to Wawa WO anter a new market ant use los, piles ro agreed wand of mouth to bring in traffic arta mousurt customers with their eatimebrand;.W PaNck Dahean, senor peroleum analyst at GmBuddy. Delfaan added the low prices can last for days or weeks until Ne ownership is satisfied the bond Is established. 'Wawa is likely Region,, profit for the aforementioned reasons. I wouldn't expect it W be permanent Its likely an accepted cost of entering a merle; Det aan lead. Lore Bruce, spokeswomen for Wawa, Pa: based Wawa, mid, 'In new markets. it is our goal to attract new customers, as we are dole, that In Palm Beach County with our offer arta comoetgve pricing. In every new mantel we've entered, we've increased the level o combustion in Me market, and Nat • benefits our customers and fuBM our value aromatic, We consider fuel as pad of our overall unique offer Mar includes food. Mom hawarages, pormar fence, services and heel In one experience.' Inexpensive gasoline is something many consumers seek, and more Nan half of consumers w it drive out of their way to save 5 cents a gallon. Lenand said, even 9dMing Nom extra order doesn't make sen.. NACSsurveytechthat57Mr Mdmnsummwillddw10minderoddtheirwayWwm5 cents a gallon. That's a 20 -minute =no trip, and at 30 miles per patch, epuates o taming to hada gallon. If gas is $2 a gallon, the motorist recur break even. Lenand mid. Even saying 10 meds a gallon amounts to only $1.80 for an 18gallm bank. 'Bit there is a reel feeding of satidadicn and a real feeling of accomplishment when you are able W. as a consumer, effect your gas pries. There IB raring em like it Leh]M mW'You well not sere someone drive out of their way to save 50 cenk on milk, bread or eggs' About the Author Sign up for arae ULISSURr Newsletters Went more nexst Sign up its oewleaem Is or come at his Palm Beath Pop detiwed m ywrmbm. • Reader Comments ra 2 of 4 4/25/17, 8:55 AM APPENDIX K u • 26 • WV jwa The Wawa Story I WI P dauaod Ell - Fulfilling Lives, Communities, and Customers Orders, Every Day •More than a Convenience Store • Known for - Family -like atmosphere - Built -to -order fresh food - Competitive fuel pricing - Community devotion - Emotional connection with customers • Wawa = Native American word for Canada Goose 0 0 0 T 0' TILL DEATH 00 THEY PART 0 • Privately held; all stores company owned • 26,000 associates • 6t" largest coffee retailer • 1.9% all fuel sold in U.S. • #38 — Forbes Ranking • Rated "America's Favorite Convenience Store" by Market Force • 709 stores Pennsylvania New rsey � ►x•�! 248 1 Mid Atlanti 42 Delaware Virgini Maryland � 78 Florida ,� Wawa Shared Ownership Wawa .'_ ESOP 41.0% d� George Wood Family 50.2% A' Sharehold r. 9.9°Io Wawa ;4 AL`U Value People Our Core Values Do The Right Thing ata . N e Delight Customers u r' Do Things Right 104 Embrace Change ,I �" PF SL 1 $'r Passion For Winning Fulfilling lives, every day, TM For our customers, communities and each other. 0 0 0 Fulfilling; • Physical Fresh food, beverages, convenience, store locations and fuel. • Social Friends, neighbors, communi connection and sharing of time and tali • Emotional Familiarity, support, understanding, comfort, care and compassion. • Psychological Respect, confidence, belonging, safety and security. Lives Our Customers Our Communities Our Associates Every Day Nothing like 1 Authentic 2 AM milk runs sincere part of me lk Pre-game Pre- meet-ups Coffee g p My Technology Business lunches • Road trips Soccer celebrations Emergencies Snowstorms Charity events Family Dart of my town EverVda,,welcome About me Fresh Helpful Best part of my day WaWaLo 11 eTrust Fresh Warm 24/7 Gas ANSI%f. WA t ,r * -Alp% CONNECT , .0gp at Deeper r Create New Customer Create New & Open Inviting, New Connections Compelling Fresh Stores in the Best Launch Wawa Re,\ords App Foods and Beverages Locations to Expand Plot Mobile Ordering Implement Cole Freestyle Our Reach Launch Wawa Fuel Discount Test New Products Open 50 new -stores— Credit Card Roll-Out Paninnis split between Florida and Achi Achieve Ton; Ratings for VOTC Friendliness Install New Sizzli Warmers Mid -Atlantic Strengthen Increase Value of Fuel Optimize Existing Communities & Convenience/ Stores in Florida to Position for the Future Maximize Performance Enable Local Donations Increase Volunteer Expand Diesel Aggressively pursue sales Opportunities Open first CNG Site growth Engage & develop Pursue Perfection in Remodel Stores Associates Store Service Levels with New designs to Continue New Connections and Execution Invigorate Environment Tours Enhance Opportunities Implement Health of the Business Scorecard Complete 40 remodels for Feedback Reduce Turnover Pilot New Store Leadership Structure Improve OSAT Scores Tuition Reimbursement $5,250 annual benefot College Graduate Leadership $5,250 annual benefit Medical Benefits Wawa pays 80%/Associates 20% • Wellness Programs Resources, screenings, discounts Top Retirement Contribution ESOP, 401(k) Recognition & Care Programs Internal Care, AIN, President's Club, Service Awards o 600m Customers Served 195m Cups of Coffee Brewed 80m Sandwiches/Hoagies Built to Order 75m surcharge -free ATM Transactions 1.9 billion gallons of fuel tZ NEW Multi Grain Muffin r V- . WaW1 Continued Growth &Reinvestment 0 -AM LJ MEW, From start to finish,.,. We invest more than $5 million with every new store developed. During Development/Construction: - Brokers/Real estate developers - Consulting firms - Skilled services: surveying/construction - Local impact/permit fees - Local contractors - Local skilled workers - Landscapers - Upscale, environmentally -friendly LED lighting • Double wall fiberglass tanks • Containment Units, at tank and under dispensers • Electronic Monitoring • Leak Detectors & Shear Valves • 24x7 Monitoring 0 • • Every new store creates 30 — 40 jobs General Manaae Customer Service Mgr Fresh Food Mgr Asst. GM Most Associates live in/near the communities in which they work. - Competitive pay Bonus opportunities Full benefits — all levels - Tuition reimbursement - 401(k)IESOP Customer Service Associates MM PROGRESS TO OUR GOAL $13,100,000 Our Purpose: Fulfilling Lives Every Day, by Building Stronger Communities 2014 is a milestone year for VJawa, marking its 50th anniversary in retail. Ifs also the year we launch The Wawa Foundation Inc-- a 501(c) ;3) non-profit corporation founded by Wawa. Inc. that allows us to fulfill lives and support communities in more extensive ways than ever The goal of Wawa and The Wawa Foundation is to commit S50 million in the next five years to causes in support of Health. Hunger and Everyday Heroes- We invite you to learn more about The Wawa Foundation and become a part of the Wawa Way. Committing $50 Million in Five Years to Health, Hunger and Everyday Heroes The Wawa Foundation 0 0 0 �IIivaWa - Foundation Our Purpose: Fulfilling Lives Every Day, by Building Stronger Communities 2014 is a milestone year for VJawa, marking its 50th anniversary in retail. Ifs also the year we launch The Wawa Foundation Inc-- a 501(c) ;3) non-profit corporation founded by Wawa. Inc. that allows us to fulfill lives and support communities in more extensive ways than ever The goal of Wawa and The Wawa Foundation is to commit S50 million in the next five years to causes in support of Health. Hunger and Everyday Heroes- We invite you to learn more about The Wawa Foundation and become a part of the Wawa Way. Committing $50 Million in Five Years to Health, Hunger and Everyday Heroes The Wawa Foundation 0 0 0 Health Heroes Hunger Financial Grants In -Kind Support Local Sponsorships and Volunteerism 0 TheWawaFoundation.org Fulf'ill'ing Lives, Every Day 0 • APPENDIX L • • 27 New Market Force Study Finds Kwik Trip 40 and BJ's Are Consumers' Favorite Places to Fuel Up With focus on fresh food, convenience stores eating into quick -service restaurant business LOUISVILLE, Colo., May 10, 2016 — Kwik Trip and BYs Wholesale Club are consumers' favorite places to fill up their gas tanks, according to a new study by Market Force Information® (Market Force), a leader in customer experience management. More than 10,000 consumers were polled for the annual study, which ranks gas stations in two separate categories – traditional gas stations and convenience stores, and grocery stores and big -box retailers with gas stations. It also uncovers trends in food, technology and loyalty at these establishments. Market Force found that, even though most motorists still fuel up at traditional gas stations, grocers and big -box brands continue to be popular choices for their low prices and convenience. For their recent trip to the pump, 71% visited a gas station, while 28% chose a grocer or big -box retailer. Additionally, while fuel prices are important, they're not the only factor influencing a consumer's choice of where to fill up – payment options, fuel quality, and the ease of entering and exiting are other key motivators. • Graph 1: Most Critical Factors in Deciding Where to Fuel Fuel price _ . : ,_. .,r 79% Payment options (cash, credit, mobile, etc.) '' ` - 50% Fuel quality .>,;; --.• 48% Ease of getting in and out of the location - = 46% Overall appearance and maintenance ,,. = 26% Loyalty programs (creditiloyalty cards, points, etc.) ""m'"` 25% The brand reputation AW- 23% Customer service provided in store *-W'# -Aw U- 21% Customer service provided at pump . x 11% Variety and brand of store items ' ` 9% Availability of good coffee ' 9% Services available (air, car wash, etc.) , -HO 8% Availability of fresh fast food -° -` 6% Kwik Trip, QuikTrip and Wawa Favorite Gas Station/C-Store Brands 0 • For the rankings, Market Force asked participants to rate their satisfaction with their most recent fueling experience and their likelihood to refer that brand to others. The results were averaged to attain a score on the Composite Loyalty Index. After not eaming enough votes in 2015 to make the list, Kwik Trip overtook Wawa this year to rank No. L QuikTrip and Wawa tied for second with 68%, and Sheetz, RaceTmc and Speedway rounded out the top five. Interestingly, the top five brands are all regional and corporate -owned. Phillips 66 is the highest-ranking national brand for the second consecutive year, earning a 51 %. Graph 2: Favorite Gas Stations/Convenience Stores Kwik Trip 70% QuikTrip 68% Wawa 68% Sheets 63% RaceTrac SW Speedway S6% Murphy USA/Express 55% • Phillips 66 51% Chevron 47% BP 47% Casey's General Stores 47% Circle K 47% Exxon 46% Wisconsin -based Kwik Trip (known m Kwik Star in Iowa) operates more than 400 locations in the Midwest and is undergoing rapid growth. It aims to be a fill-in grocery option, offering fresh meat and even making its own baked goods, dairy products and snack foods. It appears to be a winning strategy, as consumers are increasingly turning to convenience stores for fresh food options. QuikTrip Delivers on Service, Murphy Wins on Price Market Force also evaluated how well fuel brands deliver on a spectrum of attributes. QuikTrip led in three of the categories, including ease of entering and exiting the property, cashier service and having cleaning supplies at the fueling station. Kwik Trip took the top spot for appearance and merchandise selection. Chevron ranked highest for fuel quality and Murphy was voted the fuel price -leader. Wawa also performed consistently well. • Graph 3: Satisfaction Attributes Rankings — Gas Station and Convenience Store • Entry/fidt Fuel Quality Appearance Service Cleaning QuikTrip Chevron Kwik Trip QuikTrip QuikTrip Murphy Kwlk Trip 64% 61% 61% 76% 47% 52% 83% Wawa QuikTrip QuikTrip Kwik Trip RaceTrac Wawa QuikTrip 60% 60% 60% 73% 44% 52% 73% Kwik Trip Phillips 66 Wawa Wawa Kwik Trip RaceTrac Wawa 60% 56% 58% 64% 44% 50% 69% Phillips 66 Exxon RaceTrac Exxon Wawa QuikTrip RaceTrac 58% 55% 55% 61% 37% 47% 63% RaceTrac Wawa Sheetz Speedway Sheetz Arco Murphy 57% 55% 48% 60% 34% 45% 59% Mobil RaceTrac Murphy RaceTrac Casey's Circle K Exxon 56% 51% 47% 60% 34% 41% 56% Murphy BP Phillips 66 Chevron Phillips 66 Sheetz Speedway 56% 51% 45% 59% 34% 39% 53% Valero Shell Chevron Sheetz Marathon Oil Kwik Trip Sheetz 55% 50% 44% 59% 30% 38% 53% Exxon Kwik trip Speedway CiTGO Speedway Valero Phillips 66 54% 50% 42% 59% 30% 38% 52% Circle K Speedway Casey's Murphy Chevron 7-11 Sunoco 54% 49% 40% 59% 29% 37% 52% "The brands are tightly clustered in nearly every category, which shows just how fiercely • competitive this industry is," said Cheryl Flink, chief strategy officer for Market Force Information. "With drivers having so many options to choose from, gas stations and convenience stores must excel in areas beyond price, such as offering multiple payment options or specialty foods to attract loyal, repeat customers." Customers Hungry for Fresh, Custom Food From Convenience Stores With everything from freshly made salads to built -to -order hoagies, convenience stores and gas stations have upped their foodservice offerings, and are stealing market share from quick -service restaurants. Market Force found that 23% of customers bought a fresh food item during their last visit and 89% were satisfied with the quality. Wawa, Kwik Trip, Casey's, Sheetz and QuikTrip led in fresh food purchases and all had relatively high marks for food quality satisfaction. Graph 4: Fresh Food Purchases and Satisfaction Rates 0 • •p�,�{frehfoM •yeaae Kip fm�. a• yµ 6• e 0 a• • • v% • .y% • • wx • 1 ■■■ r...=1 =I>.j =j2 -1Y) all,=Jllj !LJ — I_�.I=J UIJ-)2,)m: f urs V f �i f 6 E S u Y i a 83's Ousts Costen as Fueling Favorite Among Grocers, Big -Box Retailers In the grocery and big -box category, BPs Wholesale Club took the No. 1 spot in this year's study, an honor that went to Costco in 2015. Fellow wholesale club Costco ranked second, Kroger ranked third and Sam's Club dropped a spot to fourth. Competition is tight between the top two, with only a 2 percentage point difference on the Composite Loyalty Index. Graph 5: Favorite Grocery/Wholesale Clubsfor Fuel BA 73% Costco 71% Kroger Bs% Sam's Club 52% Safeway se% Walmart 53% Costen Has Best Fuel and Best Prices When Market Force looked at the attributes that drive customer satisfaction, Costco led in three of the five categories, including fuel price, fuel quality and appearance. However, it lagged behind for ease of entering and exiting and availability of cleaning tools at the fueling area. 11 Graph 6: Satisfaction Attributes Rankings — Grocery and Big -Box Fuel Price Fuel quality Entry/Exit Appearance Cleaning Tools Costco Costco Walmart Costco Safeway 74% 62% 54% 56% 36% BYs BJ's Sam's Club Sam's Club Kroger 69% 53% 54% 48% 28% Sam's Club Sam's Club BJ's Safeway Walmart 65% 52% 52% 47% 28% Kroger Kroger Safeway Kroger BJ's 54% 51% 51% 45% 27% Walmart Safeway Kroger BPs Sam's Club 49% 48% 49% 45% 24% Safeway Walmart Costco Walmart Costco 42% 40% 44% 38% 20% Motorists Using Apps to Find Cheap Gas As in 2015, 10% said they've used a gas/convenience store mobile app. App use has increased • since last year among 45-54 year olds and decreased among 25-34 year olds. GasBuddy, which uses crowdsourcing to find the cheapest gas prices in an area, is by far the most popular app (cited by 59%). However, one-third reported using the retailer's branded app. Graph 7: Gas/Convenience Apps That Consumers Have Used 0 • GasBuddy 59% Retailer brandedapp 34%Other is% Fuel Finders% Cheap GaslE6% 6% MapQuest Gas Prices Gas Guru ■ a% SavOn Convenience Stores )1% Fuelzee 11% WEX Connect o% Price was the predominant driver for app usage. When asked which features they have used within a gas app, gas price comparison led with 71 %, followed by finding a gas station and • reporting gas prices. Graph 8: What features have you used within your gas/convenience store mobile app? n% 63% 36% g% ]% s% s% Compare fuel Locate a gas Loyalty Report gas Labelandsave Findtypeicr Other Find nearby prices station program prices frequent grades of fuel amenhies management locations Survey Demographics The survey was conducted online in March 2016 across the United States. The pool of 10,535 • respondents represented a cross-section of the four U.S. census regions, and reflected a broad spectrum of income levels, with 53% reporting household incomes of more than $50,000 a year. • Respondents' ages ranged from 18 to over 65. Approximately 73% were women and 27% were men. Follow Market Force's Convenience Store & Gas Station Insights page on LinkedIn for the latest insights, timely discussions, commentary and industry news. About Market Force Information Market Force Information® provides location -level measurement solutions that help businesses protect their brand reputation, delight customers and make more money. Solutions include customer experience surveys, mystery shopping and contact center data integrated on one technology and analytics platform. Founded in 2005, Market Force has a growing global presence, with offices in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France and Spain. It serves over 350 clients that operate multi -location businesses, including major retailers, restaurants, grocery and convenience stores, financial institutions and entertainment. More information can be found at www.marketforce.com. Date: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 • 0 0 APPENDIX M • 0 28 The new fast food? Convenience stores add hot, cheap options By Candice Choi, AP food industry writer NEW YORK — May 1, 2017,7:30 PM ET The Associated Press FILE - In this March 23, 2017, file photo, customers use a touchscreen to order food at a QuickChek convenience store in Cedar Knolls, N.J. In 2016, 22 percent of convenience stores' sales came from prepared foods like pizzas, sandwiches, burgers, coffee and fountain sodas, up steadily from 13 percent in 2010, according to a preliminary annual report released by an industry association. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez, File) Saying "convenience store food" may make people think of spinning hot dogs by the counter, but places like 7 -Eleven are expanding their hot food offerings in hopes of stealing customers away from fast-food chains. The push by convenience stores into hot, fast, affordable foods is just one of the pressures facing chains like Burger King, Wendy's and Taco Bell. The traditional fast-food chains are also fighting for customers with smaller restaurant chains, and with supermarkets that offer prepared foods for busy shoppers. Low prices and speed for ready -to -eat foods at convenience stores are big factors. McDonald's partly blames its declining number of customer visits in the U.S. on its failure to hold onto the deal -seekers at the cheaper end of its menu after eliminating the Dollar Menu. • is . "If you go to convenience store conventions, all they talk about is the decline of gas and tobacco, so they have to become more like (fast food)," Dunkin' Donuts CEO Nigel Travis said in March, noting the effect of convenience stores on his business. In the past yen, 7 -Eleven has added $1.99 chicken sandwiches and cheeseburgers kept in warming cases. That's in addition to sandwich melts the chain introduced in 2015. The chain — which still sells hot dogs by the counter—has expanded to about 8,900 U.S. locations and says food is a top priority. "We can drop in a product (in stores) overnight, and all of a sudden we're in a brand-new business," says Nancy Smith, the company's senior vice president of the chain's food and drinks. Convenience store prices points can also be a draw for people who may have less money to spend. About 60 percent of convenience store food customers have household incomes of less than $40,000, the National Association of Convenience Stores said in a recent report. Prepared foods and drinks like pizzas, burgers and coffee accounted for 22 percent of convenience store sales last year, an industry report said last month, a figure that has risen from 13 percent in 2010. The industry says many people in rural areas who may not be new supermarkets often get their groceries from convenience stores, but the push into hot and prepared foods in recent years is driven by another factor. Cigarettes remain the No. 1 seller at convenience stores, but are generally on the decline. So convenience stores are expected to keep trying to sell more food as smoking rates fall. • The Sheetz chain, which is based in Pennsylvania and has more than 540 locations in six states, says half of its new locations are built with a drive-thru, an accommodation the fast-food industry relies on for the majority of its sales. While Sheetz customers use the drive-thm mainly to order from the chain's made-to-order foods like burgers, the company says they can also request items like a gallon of milk from elsewhere in the store if they want. Travis Sheetz, the chain's vice president of operations, says he has also seen growth more recently in the cold cases where yogurts, cut fruit and other pre-packaged foods are sold. Those options cater to the growing number of people looking for "convenient health," he said. Because the convenience store industry has so many smaller chains and independents, those stores might not have the resources to develop competitive prepared food offerings, says Chris Mandeville, a Jefferies analyst who tracks the industry. That may lead some convenience stores to team up with fast-food chains like Subway rather than compete with them, and open up outposts within their locations. And for stores cooking up their own food offerings, the image of convenience store food is a challenge. "Older folks tend to think of the roller dogs that have been sitting on the grill for hours," Mandeville said. 0 Wawa, which has about 750 stores along the U.S. East Coast, says the quality of food at • convenience stores has improved. It also says convenience stores have an advantage over fast- food chains because people increasingly value speed and variety. Along with its prepared foods such as hoagies and sandwiches,_ the chain offers packaged drinks and snacks that people can grab with their meals. "That'ssomething that McDonald's and the franchisees can't match," says Mike Sherlock, who heads Wawa's food and drinks program. And while those spinning hot dogs may be a punchline for some, they're an easy way for smaller convenience store owners to get into the hot food business, says Jeff Lenard, a spokesman for the association. He says Burger King's decision to add hot dogs to its menu last year reflects their popularity. For now, Lenard notes a bigger potential problem: the convenience -store industry's reputation for unpleasant restrooms. "If you have a bad experience in the bathroom," he said, "you are not going to buy the food." Follow Candice Choi at www.twitter.com/candicechoi • 0 'T'T'T'T`TI uurfl mxm me wnscmE a[pnuxcvrs will miIiiam III 'IMIDIAM �. -- .aars.� aA "'g,p armMmrea mr r w w awW Wawa�,eR ° olaWgmg0 5 rl rc IwAumA.w.We w r' yrs rY nm�ev o�.mmrt� y ' mrsmnur _ n wm rr41 m' - r wr'�w� n vl�mR�l�tt W �11. I vt6119 fin �'e�nsw Ir r�' r�'i �amanmmwi oeW'"Wve n' .Ila.mmn 000 ,�i 'mmmrpauslmpernrAJSIXI� 6m® TV IVt N v Aeulav aln RrWBu[ HIMit V .�WI61mWYnq,WWTW. 9® MIX if I - oWWjIll f .r Wl. rOW10101 1' 9'I r ::a r 10 Wa e rn IV' I ll r {bf4N&Wu �i8r• v�gmbwvrieW,R W A 1 .armrrmmns.rmre1ww meen.uvnu\ (J� y®1{ Q� I reiwm cae vs10fi'e'W�mmW 31- �Ir. „814V Mry ' mxmromeuw.mrn.0 N� .rgaroWmWnowlwn r WaungwmwWa� Ursa Willw `,r �r 49 1 10 _ r r...a 'r w r wm � aw"fi�'nm' r wmi mWA qq n .nx,tm. 5rll mmo 1� Y� r __ _ nmwarwwmnR mrWvwermmwW �` .-- _- .I�IWwA0..mw6 araaw..Awwen.. mA\)' `• tl- � mW.omreWuillijIl Mor 9 m ? JI -9111 +M�� rmrm..mA ° .eWraaernxn,a mgmngal® r 4.. * !r Hillrodaar¢ 'Awa q°tme.n +� Y '�. W]MMOnfiI rl \, LY W 'wf MW9 4a16VRW 40e11f ` W WUldlme•B9� tWawW aAeWoewv fiUWAN9 .Irl® \ .O9M5R1id �l"98mmmY \ NTWrt I I I pf1W➢uNrpXWlk PIMMM $NEEiN — RwAAE"w % AMEiJf3N EM aaa anxnua m ' © CODE LANDSCAPE Lf1'1 wewN�manuA PIAN v.. .ro wsnAW m rartn llm, i • STAT! ROAD RN (MTII! SNAIO! MAMMOCR ROAD) - - - _ . 8. 3'_16"_ _ ._ - _ D i TYPE B NIP 15 .212 TO AELF - AT PARCEL LINE -9TREES REQ' 25 OC -535HRUB 'DO -2 EXIST. IXEDm C -9 OUST. INCLOSE PROXIMITY - - 3 TREES PRO pQE-DP - 54 SHR.,P UBS 5' HTROVBND ®4' « TYPE B BUFFER, IS W. 110 V \ - I TREES READ O 21. DC - 28 5HRU8I REQ'D @ 4' DC -7 EXIST. TREE CREDm -34 SHRUBS 24' FIT. PROVIDED . DEVIATION Y3 REQUESTED POP.WIDTH\ (t0'EXLST.) \ REMOVE 4 WSIING TREES DUE TO — OVERHEAD LINE CONPICT \ EXISTING SAGRAPE 1tEDGE TO REMAIN - CT. #2 FOUNDATION PLANFINCS, < 10,000 5 -40W X.25 X IM - 1D1S IF BFP 4 TRE;S READ @ 1:300 SF t 12226E BFP WIT -4TREES OVIDED 5.05.OS.E.1. ROW BU lBT LF -9 TREES REQ'0 @ 20' -4J SHRUBI 0.EQD dd 4' OL` - 25' W, 3' BERM REQ'0 _-9TREES PROVIDED -HEDGE OUST. BJ GOOD FOND -DEVIATION#2REQUESTEDFOR DTHB BERM VEHICIAAR USE ARE4(E ..), 132,6505 '_'_'-' C I 0" TO REMAIN 4- -13,]6551ANU.V.PE AREA PEQ'D % 4` �` II -55 TREES REQ'D®1:25051 - BJ12 SF IANDSOYPE AREA EMfI • / 10' - 43 WSi. TREE EDm ?' til ,�Feil l -12 TREES PROWDED / Iylj ' ! + 16' T 6' &DG Yl NIDATION PLANTINGS, . IO,OW 5 -11941E X ,45 X 15X' 3 J 7 5 VP TREES BEQ'D S 1300 : 5 V 16" t 255S BFR OUST - 2 EXIST. TREE cnEom � 15" -B TREES PROWDEfr s' E0. TYPE B NIP 15 .212 TO AELF - AT PARCEL LINE -9TREES REQ' 25 OC -535HRUB 'DO -2 EXIST. IXEDm C -9 OUST. INCLOSE PROXIMITY - - 3 TREES PRO pQE-DP - 54 SHR.,P UBS 5' HTROVBND ®4' « TYPE B BUFFER, IS W. 110 V \ - I TREES READ O 21. DC - 28 5HRU8I REQ'D @ 4' DC -7 EXIST. TREE CREDm -34 SHRUBS 24' FIT. PROVIDED . DEVIATION Y3 REQUESTED POP.WIDTH\ (t0'EXLST.) \ REMOVE 4 WSIING TREES DUE TO — OVERHEAD LINE CONPICT \ EXISTING SAGRAPE 1tEDGE TO REMAIN - CT. #2 FOUNDATION PLANFINCS, < 10,000 5 -40W X.25 X IM - 1D1S IF BFP 4 TRE;S READ @ 1:300 SF t 12226E BFP WIT -4TREES OVIDED 5.05.OS.E.1. ROW BU lBT LF -9 TREES REQ'0 @ 20' -4J SHRUBI 0.EQD dd 4' OL` - 25' W, 3' BERM REQ'0 _-9TREES PROVIDED -HEDGE OUST. BJ GOOD FOND -DEVIATION#2REQUESTEDFOR DTHB BERM 91.0•- F -.. 3g 14'� NGCOWPLUM HEDGE '_'_'-' C I 0" TO REMAIN 4- Cf I I 4` 11' II I li 10' s'... ?' TYPE B NIP 15 .212 TO AELF - AT PARCEL LINE -9TREES REQ' 25 OC -535HRUB 'DO -2 EXIST. IXEDm C -9 OUST. INCLOSE PROXIMITY - - 3 TREES PRO pQE-DP - 54 SHR.,P UBS 5' HTROVBND ®4' « TYPE B BUFFER, IS W. 110 V \ - I TREES READ O 21. DC - 28 5HRU8I REQ'D @ 4' DC -7 EXIST. TREE CREDm -34 SHRUBS 24' FIT. PROVIDED . DEVIATION Y3 REQUESTED POP.WIDTH\ (t0'EXLST.) \ REMOVE 4 WSIING TREES DUE TO — OVERHEAD LINE CONPICT \ EXISTING SAGRAPE 1tEDGE TO REMAIN - CT. #2 FOUNDATION PLANFINCS, < 10,000 5 -40W X.25 X IM - 1D1S IF BFP 4 TRE;S READ @ 1:300 SF t 12226E BFP WIT -4TREES OVIDED 5.05.OS.E.1. ROW BU lBT LF -9 TREES REQ'0 @ 20' -4J SHRUBI 0.EQD dd 4' OL` - 25' W, 3' BERM REQ'0 _-9TREES PROVIDED -HEDGE OUST. BJ GOOD FOND -DEVIATION#2REQUESTEDFOR DTHB BERM 9 3 sAs.0.5i.1. ROW BUFFER, 425IF - 25'W, 3' BERM READ -21 TREES REQD ® 20' OC -106 SHRUBS 0.v 04'.-13 EXLST. TREES - 8 TREES PROVIDED - EXLST. HEOGE AT PARIONG EDGE TO REMAIN -Z52 SUPPLEMENTAL SHRUBS PROVIDED =DEV WTION #2 REQUESTED FOR WIDTH & BE3IM TYPE B BUFFEk, IS' W., 2691E -11 TREES REQ'D P 2T OC - 68 SHRUBS REQD O 9', - 21 EXIST. TREE CREDm - EXIST. HEDGE IN FAIR CONDITION, INTERMITTENT - 90 SHRUBS PRMDED TO FILL IN GAPS OF EXISRNG HEDGE - 2 TREES PROW DED TO HU GAPS - DEVIATION #3 REQUESTED FOR WIDTH -(t].1. EX.) - REMOVE EXOTICS ( EARLEAF ACACIA, BRA2ILLIAN PEPPER, PONGAM SEEDLINGS ) -CLEAN UP UNDEIISTORY -TRIM EXIST WG C0000.UM HEWE 5.05.05,D, BUFFER, 165 LF D - 30• W, B' MT. WALL, Y BERM REQb -12 TREES REQ'D, 6 EA01 SIDE @ 30' OC P -55 SHRUBS REQ'D EAOI SIDE @ 3' OC 5 EXIST. TREE OREDm + EXIST. PWES RES. SIDE - ] TREES PROVIDED .55 SHRUGS PROVIDED ON BACK SIDE OF WALL - DEVIATION #1 REQUESTED WE TO WIDTH CONSTRABJTS (x 7.5' IX.) 5.05.05.D. EUFFER, ISO LF - 30' W, 8' HT. WALL, 3' BERM REQD -10 TREES REQ'D, 5 EA13151DE 0 3P OC - 50 SHRUB$ READ PAO151DE 10 GN. 4' HT, @3' OC -6 EXIST. TREE OIEDITS -4 TREES PROVIDED -1]6 SHRUBS PROVIDED - DEVIATION Y1 REQUESTED FOR WIDTH (-21. EXIST.) LEGEND • -5 6 6114fC EIRIMWWTXP } / Y48.1 WIIWV+rt a w I / �BeIbE,S'Ht i'n �4 wu+lN eGGtiB SECDON A -A aPBRn..l' riooeYnn —9l'6�('i1N9j r Vm i 4'RT IC. Acn flEW-M4iH: wlo, �irR�j C Rw:w... aw ��. •..mow um 'AjPAL. SECTION GC EAsr PRorBR�To DEVBI.oPe+ENr 9J� YIN�I fM1 -6/akll 61TITONWpeV IiA>�, waI.T4'RE, 3'Ee oml eaww ��N�reRncwmcnN WA WA VUA —NG, 6;881 SF. ® WA WA WRAC" USF ARE4 LS 6.280 SF. LANDS— MITI—)N AREA, 11,900 SF. EgSTING BUILDING FOUNDATION PANTING, IM] SF. WAWA BURRING FOUNDATION, 898 S.F. RAMING 7181.1 PAVE0.5 LBOS., SECTION D -D EssTPRoeET<TY TD llemon,EFxr `11 4- 1ZA" •12 1,TR NF ?' til ,�Feil l SID - &a, Iylj ' 9 3 sAs.0.5i.1. ROW BUFFER, 425IF - 25'W, 3' BERM READ -21 TREES REQD ® 20' OC -106 SHRUBS 0.v 04'.-13 EXLST. TREES - 8 TREES PROVIDED - EXLST. HEOGE AT PARIONG EDGE TO REMAIN -Z52 SUPPLEMENTAL SHRUBS PROVIDED =DEV WTION #2 REQUESTED FOR WIDTH & BE3IM TYPE B BUFFEk, IS' W., 2691E -11 TREES REQ'D P 2T OC - 68 SHRUBS REQD O 9', - 21 EXIST. TREE CREDm - EXIST. HEDGE IN FAIR CONDITION, INTERMITTENT - 90 SHRUBS PRMDED TO FILL IN GAPS OF EXISRNG HEDGE - 2 TREES PROW DED TO HU GAPS - DEVIATION #3 REQUESTED FOR WIDTH -(t].1. EX.) - REMOVE EXOTICS ( EARLEAF ACACIA, BRA2ILLIAN PEPPER, PONGAM SEEDLINGS ) -CLEAN UP UNDEIISTORY -TRIM EXIST WG C0000.UM HEWE 5.05.05,D, BUFFER, 165 LF D - 30• W, B' MT. WALL, Y BERM REQb -12 TREES REQ'D, 6 EA01 SIDE @ 30' OC P -55 SHRUBS REQ'D EAOI SIDE @ 3' OC 5 EXIST. TREE OREDm + EXIST. PWES RES. SIDE - ] TREES PROVIDED .55 SHRUGS PROVIDED ON BACK SIDE OF WALL - DEVIATION #1 REQUESTED WE TO WIDTH CONSTRABJTS (x 7.5' IX.) 5.05.05.D. EUFFER, ISO LF - 30' W, 8' HT. WALL, 3' BERM REQD -10 TREES REQ'D, 5 EA13151DE 0 3P OC - 50 SHRUB$ READ PAO151DE 10 GN. 4' HT, @3' OC -6 EXIST. TREE OIEDITS -4 TREES PROVIDED -1]6 SHRUBS PROVIDED - DEVIATION Y1 REQUESTED FOR WIDTH (-21. EXIST.) LEGEND • -5 6 6114fC EIRIMWWTXP } / Y48.1 WIIWV+rt a w I / �BeIbE,S'Ht i'n �4 wu+lN eGGtiB SECDON A -A aPBRn..l' riooeYnn —9l'6�('i1N9j r Vm i 4'RT IC. Acn flEW-M4iH: wlo, �irR�j C Rw:w... aw ��. •..mow um 'AjPAL. SECTION GC EAsr PRorBR�To DEVBI.oPe+ENr 9J� YIN�I fM1 -6/akll 61TITONWpeV IiA>�, waI.T4'RE, 3'Ee oml eaww ��N�reRncwmcnN WA WA VUA —NG, 6;881 SF. ® WA WA WRAC" USF ARE4 LS 6.280 SF. LANDS— MITI—)N AREA, 11,900 SF. EgSTING BUILDING FOUNDATION PANTING, IM] SF. WAWA BURRING FOUNDATION, 898 S.F. RAMING 7181.1 PAVE0.5 LBOS., SECTION D -D EssTPRoeET<TY TD llemon,EFxr T'T'T'T` ----'------------ e # %/M8MA1EPf4SMIE -# Ir it lei , ' 1 s ttW TOLEM r it Wf 11 ® weans m u�u%smm ® 4` is14IV �� ® ® If © wm& .A�r IT�SpmttaO4�wit Mt i© ® mR28mEO11ROE WESIONE If (®}�f NMN,Y ILS 91TVMxF1l�Kw R�WiFa ) �2' 061' "�il'J� �R��159 m'OW.It �Px61H6NY ,P. rr4'-� aueawwmevrxrsxn�.w. 1IRbY/IbM�5.bet`.RPw.MM6MlW AYK �Y �YY ®i' 1 � 1` IgMwWxwP]SS MYpIIQ961MGPPY 1!3E54v�v:unaaWmm!cnt4.'.m u'6Pu8 (Ny��R.Y il- r it nova�m MttnwenEamuev[ar 'C r �IY ge Al�.i I IIY SMwGtuf5149uxwun McIDWaR ren ` t NeAwwuuoawMrwwu ne Mol&sWl[IDryamrtgwP�n W mM ItIV EFFAIR xmwxt'wxRM¢sv.IpW5n' va�ama �� ammxrtcmimewwvuwwrrvnav `.):� i osuumumewmmmcwnwPaw�v 11 ,A � wm ri �mwaMi�e�vxaam Ell H Ir ✓ N, i 5 1 ) I I emvmxmwnx RBumla: ^ ^ jXfiTA erum mpo mna=g,nm„® wee ©I y WSCHEDULE& "" :mow MUM. WAWA3kvIRN21 � � IRRIGATION SCHEMATIC LA -3 • PLANTING NOTES 1. ALL PUNTS MUST BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL, FREE OF PESTS AND DISEASES. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE IN FULL AND STRICT ACCORDANCE TO FLORIDA NO. 1 GRADE, ACCORDING TO THE "GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS", PUBLISHED BY FLORIDA DEPARMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICE$. PLANT MATERIALS IN SOME INSTANCES EXCEED NO. 1 GRADE IN ORDER TO MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PROJECT. 2. THE OWNER, AGENT TENANT OR PARTY IN CONTROL OF THE PROPERTY IS TO MAINTAIN THE SITE LANDSCAPING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COLLIER COUNTY LANDSCAPE CODE. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF COWER COUNTYS CODE OF ORDINANCES, AND WOULD SUBJECT THE AFORMENTIONED PARTY TO ANY PENALTY IMPOSED BY LAW. IR 3. CONACIOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUNTS MEETING SPECIFICATION AS NOTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ALL PLANT MATERIAL THAT DOES NOT CONFORM TO SPECIFICATIONS 4. ALL ROOTBAl1S SHALL CONFORM TO THE SIZE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN 'AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK". 5. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED WRONG TRANSPORT AND DELIVERY TO NIB SITE WITH SHADE CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS OF WINDBURN PREVENTION. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL INFORMATION PRIOR TO INITIATING PUNTING INSTALLATION. ALL EXISTING PLANTING SHALL REMAIN INTACT AND UNDISTURBED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 7. ALL TREES MUST BE STRAIGHT TRUNKED, FULL HEADED, AND MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED. 8. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SHALL AVOID DAMAGE TO ALL UTILITIES WRING CONSTRUCTION. SHOULD THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR CAUSE DAMAGE TO ANY UTILITIES, NECESSARY REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE AS QUICKLY AS PRACTICABLE, AT LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 9. INSTALLATION - ALL PUNT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A SOUND, WORLM I_IX=MANNER AND ACCORDING TO ACCEPTED GOOD PUNTNG PROCEDURES WRH THE QUALITY OF PUNT MATERIAL$ AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. ALL ELEMENTS OF LANDSCAPING SMALL BE INSTALLED SO AS TO MEET ALL APPLICABLE ORDINANCES AND CODE REQUIREMENTS. l0. TYPICALLY, SHRUB AND GNOUNCCWER PLANTINGS ARE SHOWN AS MASS %AMONG BEDS PLANTS SHALL BE PLACED ON A TRIANGULAR SPACING CONFIGURATION (STAGGERED SPACING) AS SHOWN IN THE PUlUING DETAILS. PLANT CENTER TO CENTER DIMENSIONS (D.C.) ARE LISTED W THE PLANT LIST. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE DRAINAGE AND PERWUTION OF ALL PLANTING PITS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL ALL TREE PIIS WITH WATER BEFORE PLANTING TO ASSURE THAT PROPER DRAINAGE AND PERCOUTIONIS AVAILABLE. CORRECT IF REQUIRED TO ASSURE PERCOLATION. TO CONTRACR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACEMENT OF ALL PLANTS LOST DUE TO INADEQUATE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS. 12. TREES GROWN IN GROW BAGS OR GROW BAG TYPE MATERIAL MUST HAVE THE B GROW BAG REMOVED ENTIRELY PRIOR TO PLANTING . 13. BALLED AND BURUPPED MATERIAL SHALL HAVE THE TOP ONE HALF (1/2)OF THE BURLAP AROUND THE BASE OF THE TRUNK CUT AND PULLED BACK. DO NOT REMOVE BURLAP. WIRE CAGES, STRAPS, ETC. MUST BE CUT AND HEMMED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ALL PLASTIC WRAPPING SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 14. GO OR TO REPLACE REJECTED PLANT MATERIAL WITHIN ME(1)WEEK OF NOTICE ROM THE OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE PLANTING DETAILS, PUNTS LIST, GENERAL NOTES AND THE PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMPLETE LANDSCAPE PLANTING INSTRUCTIONS. 16. FERTILIZATION PALMS I3-3-13 PLUS MINOR ELEMENTS - SLOW HELENSE 1/2 U FERTILLIER PER 112 INCH CALIPER SHRUBS AND GRWNDCOYERS B-10-10PLUSMINORELEMENTS-SLOW RELEASE 1/2 LB FERTILIZER PER 100 FT2 THEES 8456 PLUS MINOR ELEMENTS - SLOW RELEASE 1/2 LB FERTILIZER PER 1/2 INCH CALIPER TURF l6 PLUSMINOREUMENTS-SLOWRELEME1lBF U_IZER A PLA 1000 M - THE COST FOR LANDSCAPE FERTILIZER AS DESCRIBED ABOVE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PER PLANT PRICE. - 4= 17, SOIL PREPARATION AND SOIL MIX A APPLY ROUNDUP (MANUFACTURED BY MONSANTO CORP.) OR APPROVED HERBICIDE EQUAL ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S RATE AND SPECIFICATION WDNIN LIMITS OF ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED. PROTECT EXISTING PUNTS TO REMAIN FROM OVEUPRAY OR SPRAY WIFHIN ROOT ZONE. CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE TOTAL WEED ERADICATION. S. BEFORE REPLACING TOPSOIL, RAS SUBSOIL SURFACE CLEAR OF STONES (1 INCH DIAMETER AND LARGER), DEBRIS, RUBBISH, AND REMAINING FROM REMOVED PLANT MATERIAL C. SCARIFY SUBSOIL TO A DEPTH OF 3 INCHES. D. CONTRACTOR TO APPLY "RONSTAR" OR APPROVED PRE -EMERGENT HERBICIDE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RATE AND SPECIFICATIONS. E. PLANTING SOIL MIX FOR TREES, SHRUBS, AND GRANNDCOVERS SHALL CONSIST OF A THOROUGHLY BLENDED MIXTURE OF: 1. ROYAL PALMS 60% CLEAN D.O.T. SAND 40% APPROVED TOPSOIUCOMPOS7` 2. ALL OTHER PALMS 90% CLEAN D.O.T. SAND 10% APPROVED TOPSOIUCOMPOST 3. TREES, SHRUBS, AND GROUND COVERS/SOD 70%CLEW O.O.T. SAND M% APPROVED TOPSOIUCOMPOST. F. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT LABORATORY SOIL TESTS OF THE SOIL MIXTURE FOR TEST RESULT REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY UNDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO AMEND THE SOILS PER THE TESTING RESULTS AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. G. COMPOST MIX SHAH BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERWS THAT W W LD BE HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH, SHALL BE FREE OF NEMATODES, SHALL BE OF UNIFORM QUALITY AND SHALL HAVE A PH VALUE BETWEEN 5.5 AND 6.5 (AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASIM 00). FLORIDA PEAT SHALL BE STERILIZED TO MAKE FREE OF ALLVIABLE NUT GRASS AND OTHER UNDESIRABLE WEEDS. H. TOPSOIL SHALL BE NATURAL, FERTILE, AGRICULTURAL SOIL CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING VIGOROUS PUNT GROWTH. IT SHALL BE OF UNIFORM COMPOSITION THROUGHOUT, WITH ADMIXTURE OF SUBSOIL IT SHALL BE FREE OF STONES, LUMPS, LIVE PLANTS AND THEIR ROOTS, STICKS, AND OTHER EMRANEOUS MATTER SPREAD TOPSOIL MIXTURE TO MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES THROUGHOUT ALL AREAS AND 61NCHES IN ALL SHRUB AND GRWNDCOVER MOS. REMOVE ALL ROCKS AND OTHER OBJECTS OVER 1 INCH IN DIAMETER. 1. SMOOTH ALL PREPARED TOPSOIL TO FOUR (4) INCHES BELOW TOP OF SURROUNDING PAVEMENT EWES. FINISH GRADE ALL PREPARED TOPSOIL AREAS TO A SMOOTH, EVEN SURFACE ASSURING POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THESTRUCTURES AND AND ELIMINATE ANY LOW AREAS NOT REQUIRED BY THE DOCUMENTS WHICH MAY COLLECT WATER J. SMOOTH TOPSOIL MIXTURE TO 6INCHES BELOW GRACE IN AREAS TO BE SODDED. K TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE EXTREMELY ACIDIC OR AU INE, NOR CONTAIN TOXIC SUBSTANCES WHICH MAY BE HARMFUL TO PUNT GROWTH. THE PH SHALL BE IN THE RANGE OF 5.5 TO 6.5. IF NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR TOPSOIL PH SWILL APPLY THE APPROPRIATE SOIL AMENDMENTS ADJUSTING SOIL PH TO ASSURE A PH RANG- OF 5.5 TO 6.5. 18. GUYING / STAKING PRACTICES SHALL NOT PERMIT NM.S, SCREWS, WIRES ETC, TO PENETRATE OUTER SURFACE OF TREE OR PALM. TREES OR PALMS REJECTED WE TO THIS PRACTICE SHALL BE REPLACED. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL MULCH ALL PLANT MATERIAL THROUGHOUT AND COMPLETELY TO A THREE (3) INCH DEPTH WITH CLEAN, WEED FREE MULCH AS SPECIFIED. 20. TME CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING, IN FULL ALL PLANTING AREAS (INCLUDING WATERING, SPRAYING, MULCHING, MOWING, FERTILIZING, ETC.) UNTIL THE JOB IS ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER. 21. CONTRACTOR TO GUARANTEE PUNT MATERIAL FOR A 12 MONTH PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SUE ONCE A MONTH TO REVI THE STATUS OF MAINTENANCE BT THE OWNER AND ADVISE IN WRITING PNY ACTIVITIES OR DISCREPENCIFS THAT ARE POTENTIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION OR MAY VOID WARRANTY. 22. ALL PUNT MATERIALSHALL BE OF FLORIDA NO. 1 OR BETTER QUALITY AT TIME OF INSTALLATION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN THIS SAME CONDITION UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. DECLINE IN CONDITION OF PLANT MATERIAL DURING THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD SHALL BE GROUNDS FOR REJECTION AND REPUCEMENT. 23. XERISCAPE PRINCIPLES AS OUTLINED M THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT XERISCAPE PANT GUIDE 2 SHALL BE APPUED THROUGHOUT LANDSCAPE INSTALUTION AND MAINTENANCE. IN COORDINATION WITH: PREPARED FOR: RWA ENGINEERING AMERICAN COMMERCIAL NAPLES SOUTH PLAZA 6618 WILLOW PARK SUITE 2W REALTY CORP. WAWA SERVICE PLAZA NAMES, FL 34109 • O EwIN�[ANH TxAx 6 LALW AS �SPECWfe� � rHxtaH \\'!9l VLIiF]�IX 4 SHRUBS PLANTING DETAIL SABAL PALM DETAIL TREE PLANTING DETAIL l Raze \II 177_ m . uo / �1 R :�'��bil1�Vll�ahll� I ROYAL PALM PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: AS NO ® Ono/U Rev Wnwns DATE: 1/09/17 ® slaw Rev Rex --Cana PROJECT*: dE 9o[wK/ PAWD AREA Hess THAT Ns m mB HNIw. TYPICAL CANOPY TREE WITH ROOT BARRIER XT AAE RFWIRm wErE lAs¢ WNOPY 11 S A%1H A5 uK Docs. rs A sDEwA PARD NEA. ON BIIKOYNy Ax0 9NAu Tux PARNR4 =N- "PAM HAPEA pi &YDWG ro A p5TN12 W WT C- DIREC1xIN FRW 1R11Nt. WT BAMBFAs SHALL BE A YINRW Of IW OFID ND SHALL IXIF1O UP ro NHI9E0 BMBE BE APPROMD BY= AHO WMOAPE ARpRIECI. ANO 'TWT SaNNWxs'. -Au ROUT BNITRDNS SHNy E umN1Fn N ACarmAN(E wTx wHUTAOWxexs sPetlOGMfxs. PLANTING DETAILS & NOTES NEA/ BUHDlNO SHEET # LA -4 RN,.., ENGINEERING June 15, 2017 Ms. Rachel Beasley Principal Planner, Zoning Services Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Subject: Naples South Plaza (Wawa) - PU0160000191- Site Plan With Deviations Naples South Plaza (Wawa) - PU0170000082 -Automobile Service Waiver Response to Planner Comments Dear Ms. Beasley: Please accept this letter in response to your email dated June 7th for the above subject project. This letter outlines responses to each comment including stipulations. Please find attached the following items in support of the response for the above subject project: 1. This response letter; 2. Updated list of deviations and justifications 3. Updated exhibits showing existing conditions on site • 4. Updated Site Plan with Deviations Master Plan 5. Property appraisers data sheet 6. The 1993 SDP showing 7' buffer 7. 2005 approved plans for loading dock • In reply to your review comments, we offer the following responses in bold: Zonine Questions for Naples South Plaza, Wawa DR: Deviation 1: You write 5.05.05.D.2.9, do you mean the "9" to be an "a"? Response: Yes, this has been corrected. Deviation 1: The proposed 25 feet is an even 25 feet the whole length? Part will go down to 7 feet? I would recommend stating this request fact in the first paragraph to immediately frame total request; as it is currently, the reduction to 7 feet is the last paragraph. Additionally, please refresh my memory, it goes to 7 feet due to existing drive lane and the turning radius requirement of.....? Response: The text regarding the 7' buffer width hos been added to the deviation with an explanation that it is indeed due to the drive lane requirements at the rear of the building. 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 1(239) 597-0575 1 Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-nva.com G� Deviation 1: 0 Please show the measurement of RMF -12 zoning to Wawa to visually solidify its distance of over 250 feet. Response: A measurement line has been added to the Master Plan identifying the distance between the RMF -12 zoning property line and the Wawa. Deviation 1: What kind of mitigation is the triangle 1 between residential and this parcel? I understand the mitigation triangle next to the Wawa. Response: Supplemental plantings in excess of requirements will be placed in this area as stated in the deviation, to include; slash Pine trees to tie in with the existing vegetation, a Green Button wood hedge, 10 gal, 4' o.c. on both sides of the wall, and Muhly Grass on both sides to the property line and edge of pavement. For the portion of this buffer that is 7' in width, the wall will be located at the edge of pavement on the commercial side, with a Green Buttonwood hedge 10 gal. 4' o.c. on the residential side. Deviation 2: You state that current buffers (along rattlesnake and US 41) meet the LDC requirements for ROW widths for current use of Naples South Plaza. Please cite specific LDC requirements for ROW widths. Response: LDC section 4.06.02.0.4 requires a 15' Type D buffer for C-4 Zoning abutting a 100'+ ROW. This has been noted in the deviation justification. • Deviation 3: Submit a copy of the SDP 93-74 which shows allowance of 7 -foot buffer. Or show documentation of the 7 -foot buffer allowance. Response: SDP 93-74 is attached, the 7' buffer width is shown near SE corner of property. Deviation 3: Show on site plan the "over 400 feet from the proposed Wawa" Response: We have identified this distance on the Master Plan from the Wawa to the closest boundary of the St. Peter Ministry Center and adjusted the measurement to reflect changes to the building footprint. Also updated on Master Plan is the parking calculations to reflect the additional parking requirements for seating. Deviation 3: Northwest portion, "expansion of the buffer to 15' is not physically possible." What is the existing buffer, 10 feet? Response: Correct, that current buffer is 10 feet. Page 2 of 4 • K:\2014\140035.01.01 Rattlesnake & 41 —Naples South Plaza\001 Site Plan with Deviations\Site Plan with Deviatiom\Application Support\1st Insufficiency\Working Docs\Responses to comments 6-8-17\2017-06-15 Response Ltr Submittal.docxK:\2014\140035.01.01 Rattlesnake & 41 —Naples South Plaza\001 Site Plan with Deviations\Site Plan with Deviatiow\Application SupporMst Insufficiency\Working Docs\Responses to comments 6-8-17\2017-06-15 Response Ltr Submittal.docx • Exhibits: You have 2 Exhibit B's, please explicitly delineate where these photos are taken from. B-1 northeast C4 and B-2 northwest C-4 perhaps. Response: This has been corrected and is attached. Stormwater Review, Richard Orth. phone: 252-5092. richardorth@colliereov.net Correction 1: Please provide the level of stormwater treatment and attenuation design for the current site and proposed. Response: per SFWMD permit issued we have done a pre -development vs post development discharge analysis and are not increasing flows nor are we increasing stages for the 25 -year 3 -day and the 100 year -3 day events. Correction 2: Please review the proposed project site improvement in relationship to compliance with LDC 3.07.02.A. Response: We are somewhat surprised about receiving this comment as part of a site plan with deviations application given that we're not asking to deviate from water management • standards. However we have looked at the prop appraiser's website (attach data sheet) and that our proposed improvements will not exceed 50% of the $5.11 Million assessed value. ASW Questions: Question 1: What are the hours of the 7-11? Or rather similar operation to Wawa? Response: Hours of operation for the 7-11 are 24/7. Question 2: The referenced 8,9505F building is the one on the shopping center plaza between the bank and proposed Wawa? Response: That is correct. • Page 3 of 4 K,aDI J4WM01P Imm4e&41-uVb Snmhrlv.aSI SI¢eLnwnOeviulnn�41¢eW VChDrvWom.Apyliulon9upp�.�d4¢vIS[ircy�WMiiy +wmWwvu w u:as�nxonm�sx�oa.wswMmwmo�uoin�4Wss o�o� w� 441-wrmmsown rv.. 1sn<emn..;mo.�mH�tn<eian.ae orwo.wssuwm. s�om�n..mmwom, rS vw _m .sairvon.asis R, �, s.mm.oiaoa ene�Ntan�e We trust the enclosed information is sufficient for your review and approval. Should you have any Is questions or require additional information, please contact our office at (239) 597-0575. Sincerely, RWA, Inc. Patrick Vanasse, AICP Planning Project Manager cc: George Klier File 130019.02.00 Page 4 of 4 0 K:\2014\140035.01.01 Rattlesnake & 41 — Naples South Plaza\001 Site Plan with Deviations\Site Plan with Deviations\Application Support\Ist Insufficiency\Working Docs\Responses to comments 6-8-17\2017-06-15 Response Ltr Submittal.docxK:\2014\140035.01.01 Rattlesnake & 41 —Naples South Plaza\001 Site Plan with Deviations\Site Plan with DeAations\Application Support\1st Insufficiency\Working Docs\Responses to comments 6-8-17\2017-06-15 Response Ltr Submittal.docx AGENDA ITEM 3-D CofteY CAmnty STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING: JULY 27, 2017 SUBJECT: ZLTR (CUD)-PL20170000993, FOUNDERS PLAZA PUD FOR USE OF PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR APPLICANT/AGENT: Applicant: Ghassoub Frangie/John Adams 75 Logan Blvd South Naples, FL 34119 Agent: Ghassoub Frangie Aquilam Investigations, LLC 5270 Goldeh gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 REOUESTED ACTION: The Applicant wishes to have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) affirm a zoning verification letter issued by the Planning and Zoning Division pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06, in which County staff determined that the proposed use of private investigator (SIC 7381) is comparable in nature to other permitted principal uses in Tract "F" under Section 5.3 A. of the Founders Plaza PUD, Ordinance No. 02-68, as amended. ZLTR(CUD}PL20170000993 Page t of 5 Foundefa Plaza PUD GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway, approximately one third mile east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 13.33± acres. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: Subject: Founder's Plaza Planned Unit Development (PUD) North: Golden Gate Parkway ROW and then Parkway Promenade PUD East: Founder's Plaza PUD and then residences zoned RMF -6 South: Residences zoned RMF -6 West: Founders Plaza PUD and then Golden Gate Parkway ROW Aerial Photo, parcel outlined in teal (Are Reader) ZLTR(CUD)-PL20170000993 Page 2 of 5 Founder's Plan PUD PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Applicant seeks a determination that the use of a private investigator with security services, SIC 7381, is comparable in nature to those permitted uses in Section 5.3.A. Ordinance 02-68, as amended. The applicant requested a Zoning Verification Letter (ZLTR) from the Planning Manager on March 14, 2017. The Planning Manager issued a ZLTR stating that the use of a private investigator, SIC 7381, is comparable and compatible with the listed uses in the Founders Plaza PUD. This hearing is to seek affirmation of that opinion by the HEX. ANALYSIS: LDC Section 10.02.06 J. Lb, Comparable Use Determinations, states: "The County Manager or Designee may issue a zoning verification letter to determine whether a use within a PUD is consistent and compatible with the surrounding uses within the PUD. To be effective, the zoning verification letter shall be approved by the BCC by resolution, at an advertised public hearing." The BCC delegated this duty to the Hearing Examiner through Ordinance 2013-25. The comparable analyzation of beauty shop and barber shop to the uses in this PUD are threefold: t. similar zoning, 2. external impacts and 3. business character. The Standard Industrial Classification Code for the requested use Private Investigator with accessory security is 7381 which includes establishments primarily engaged in detective and guard services. This SIC Code is a permitted use in the General Commercial District (C-4), Heavy Commercial District (C-5), and the Industrial District (I) of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The Founder's Plaza Planned Unit Development (PUD) lists permitted uses in Section V, for Tract "F", and encompasses Commercial Professional and General Office District (C-1), Commercial Convenience District (C-2), Commercial Intermediate District (C-3), General Commercial District (C-4), Heavy Commercial District (C-5), and Industrial District (I). Thus, private investigator is a land use permitted within the zoning range outlined in Section 5.3.A of this PUD. Additionally, the applicant asserts that private investigator is similar in nature to insurance inspection and investigation, SIC 6411, which is a permitted use in Section V of this PUD; insurance inspection and investigation are permitted per Section 5.3.A.#8. The applicant states that the business character of the facility will be similar in nature to office based businesses and asserts that the, "private investigation business will consist of strictly office work." The accessory security will consist of activities such as executive security of individuals, personal protection. Per Section 5.2 of this PUD, Tract "F" is intended "to provide professional offices and commercial land uses consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan." This address is located within the Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial Subdistrict within the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (Master Plan) of the Growth Management Plan. This Master Plan states that uses contained within this Subdistrict are, "general low intensity, office development associated with retail uses, and community facility uses, such as churches, which will minimize vehicular traffic." Section 5.3 of this ZLTR(CUD)-PL20170000993 Page 3 of 5 Founder's Plaza PUD PUD permits uses from SIC Major group 73 -Business Services. While private investigator, SIC 7381, is not a permitted use in this Section, it does allow other Major group 73 uses which are professional offices. It is therefore deemed by staff that SIC 7381, private investigator, is similar in business character to the permitted uses within Section V of this PUD. The external impact of the requested use will be equal to or less than office use external impacts, as outlined by the applicant in their application. The applicant states that 95% of the time no one will be at the office and that they would not have an office if the state didn't mandate it. The applicant states that clientele will consist of individuals to entities such as law firms, and the majority of services rendered to clients will occur outside of the office. The LDC's private investigator parking calculations are the office parking calculations, 1 space per 300 square feet, and thus are required the same parking as professional offices as outlined as the intent of this PUD per Section 5.2, "to provide professional offices and commercial land uses consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan." The applicant states that the office is approximately 175 square feet and thus would be allowed one parking space. With the applicant's provisions of office functioning, it is deemed by staff that the external impacts are the same to professional offices. Based upon above analysis, the use of a private investigator with accessory security services, SIC 7381, is comparable/compatible with the permitted uses in Section V of the Founders Plaza PUD, Ordinance 02-68, as amended. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on July 7, 2017. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner affirm the opinions of the Zoning Manager that: The use of a private investigator with accessory security services, SIC 7381, is comparable and compatible with the permitted uses in Section 5.3.A. permitted principal uses and structures of the Founders Plaza PUD, Ordinance 02-68, as amended. Attachments: A. Zoning Verification Letter B. Application ZLTR(CUD)-PL20170000993 Page 4 of 5 Founder's Plaza PUD PREPARED BY: 6 - RACHEL BEASLEY, SENIOR PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: /-' �/�, 6.7-9-17 RAYMOI< V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION /055:7�� (a -3v Il MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION ZLTR(CUD)-PL20170000993 Page 5 of 5 Founders Plaza PUD Cod ier Couni y Growth Management Department — Planning & Regulation Zoning Services Division April 20, 2017 Ghassoub Fmngie Aquilam Investigations, LLC 5270 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 341116 Re: Zoning Verification Letter ZLTR (CUD)-PL20170000993; Zoning Verification Letter— Comparable Use Determination for the Founder's Plaza Planned Unit Development, 5270 Golden Gate Parkway, located within in Section 28 Township 49 South, Range 26 East, of unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Property ID/Folio: 66030002122. Dear Mr. Frangie This letter is in response to a Comparable Use Determination (CUD) application which was submitted by the applicant requesting a determination from the Zoning Manager and affirmation from the Office of the Hearing Examiner that the use of a private investigation company, Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) 7381, is comparable and compatible with the permitted uses in Section V of the Founders Plaza Planned Unit Development (MPUD), Ordinance 02-68, as amended. The applicable ordinance regulating the zoning and use of the subject property is the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Ordinance 04-41, as amended. The current Official Zoning Atlas, an element of the LDC, reveals the subject property has a zoning designation of the Founders Plaza PUD, Ordinance 02-68, as amended. This address is located within Tract "F" as outlined in the PUD's Master Plan; allowable uses are listed in Section 5.3.A. Section 5.3.A.#21 states that, "any other commercial use or professional service, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA)." The comparability review parameters of this application are threefold: 1. similar zoning, 2. business character and 3. external impacts. Regarding similar zoning, the Standard Industrial Classification 7381, under which private investigators falls, is a permitted use in the General Commercial District (C4), Heavy Commercial District (C-5), and the Industrial District (1) of the LDC. This PUD's permitted uses in Section V, for Tract "F", encompass Commercial Professional and General Office District (C-1), Commercial Convenience District (C-2), Commercial Intermediate District (C-3), General Commercial District (C-4), Heavy Commercial District (C-5), and Industrial District (I). Thus, private investigator is a land use permitted within the zoning range outlined in Section 5.3.A of this PUD. Additionally, the applicant asserts that private investigator is similar in nature to insurance inspection and investigation, SIC 6411, which is a permitted use in Section V of this PUD; insurance inspection and investigation are permitted per Section 5.3.A.#8. It is therefore deemed by staff that SIC 7381, private investigator, is similar in regard to zoning classification. Per the applicant, the business character of the facility will be similar in nature to office based businesses; stating, "private investigation business will consist of strictly office work." Per Section 5.2 of this PUD, Tract "F" is intended "to provide professional offices and commercial land uses consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan." This address is located within the Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial Subdistrict within Attachment A the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (Master Plan) of the Growth Management Plan. This Master Plan states that uses contained within this Subdistrict are, "general low intensity, office development associated with retail uses, and community facility uses, such as churches, which will minimize vehicular traffic." Section 5.3 permits uses from SIC Major group 73 -Business Services. While private investigator, SIC 7381, is not a permitted use in this Section, it does allow other Major group 73 uses which are professional offices. It is therefore deemed by staff that SIC 7381, private investigator, is similar in business character to the permitted uses within Section V of this PUD. The applicant states that 95% of the time no one will come to the office and that, "we would (he and his partner) not have an office if the state didn't mandate it." The applicant states that clientele will consist of individuals to entities such as law firms, and the majority of services rendered to clients will occur outside of the office, stating "the bottom line is that our office would probably be empty of people 90% of the time." The LDC's private investigator parking calculations are the office parking calculations, 1 space per 300 square feet, and thus are required the same parking as professional offices as outlined as the intent of this PUD per Section 5.2, `to provide professional offices and commercial land uses consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan." The applicant states that the office is approximately 175 square feet and thus would be allowed one parking space. With the applicant's provisions of office functioning, it is deemed by staff that the external impacts are the same to professional offices. The Zoning Manager has reviewed the application and submittal documents and finds the argument made to be compelling. It has been concluded that the use of private investigator, SIC 7381, is comparable and compatible with the permitted uses in Section V of the Founders Plaza PUD, Ordinance 02-68, as amended. More specifically, the use outlined in the Founders Plaza PUD Section V, 5.3.A. Permitted principal uses and structures. Therefore, in accordance with the PUD under Section V, 5.3.A #21, private investigator, SIC 7381, is deemed comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses in Section v. Disclaimer: Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Please be advised that the information presented in this verification letter is based on the Collier County LDC and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendment(s) to either of these documents could affect the validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited to, concurrency related to the provision of adequate public facilities, environmental impact, and other requirements of the Collier County LDC or related ordinances. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (239)252- 8202 or e-mail: mchelbeasley@colliergov.net. Researched and prepared by: QW1,X 11Z Rachel Beasley, Planner Zoning Services Section C: Annis Moxam, Addressing Section Laurie Beard, PUD Monitoring Reviewed by: / C Raymoripellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Services Section g_. 7 Goter Cvumy _ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOitiiiW f GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereoy.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Zoning Verification Letter - Comparable Use Determination LDC sections 2.03.00 A, 10.02.06 J & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Chapter 3 G.6 of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED PUD Zoning District Straight Zoning District I H APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): GH /155 0 U, � RJA� G -I L ') ON iv J4 C)Ov S Address: 7S �0 G -AN i34 V19, S, City: _N6 PtCState: FL --ZIP: 3L-lll9 Telephone: Cell: 617- 389-0110 Fax: E -Mail Address: _ G 1) ;2, F iz n N Glc e7 G Mii IG , C uhf r. Name of Agent: _ 1 14 `� 5 C t• 13 E A k 61,6 Firm: _ A t,' L L Alam. X X b't='.5 T! &A TIT G'.J1.r 5 L L G Address: - Z 70 GCt PEA) GArE PrL i+// City: /V f{ 1'L F5 State: rL ZIP: 310 6 Telephone: Cell: Fax: E -Mail Address: PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address: G()L 26 N tali %,� A001 Folio Number: Property Owners Name: 1- A SIU G£E LLC- _ I DETERMINATION REQUEST I The determination request and justification for the use must be done by a certified land use planner or a land use attorney. Provide the completed request on a separate attached sheet. Please be very specific and include the SIC Code, if known. The request should adhere to the following format: "I request a determination from the Planning Manager and approval from the Office of the Hearing Examiner, that the use of*46 comparable and compatible with the permitted uses in the PUD or in the Straight Zoning District." A 04KWO VP/f pts 14404E.0' 9/25/2014 Attachment B Page 1 of 2 v r county -000101�� 0 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coliferizov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST See Chapter 3 G.6 of the Administrative Code for submittal requirements. The following items are to be submitted with the application packet. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County Q website) Determination request and the justification for the use PUD Ordinance and Development Commitment information Electronic Copies of all documents *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all (] materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. FEE REQUIREMENTS: El Application: $1,000.00; Additional Fees of $100 per hour will be charged as needed upon completion of review and research. Payment of Additional Fees will be required prior to the release of the verification. F1 Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $425re&— Alt checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 q Applicant Signature Date ('-Nl4St ov13 F 1; t1JUC7IL Printed Name Please be advised that the zoning letter is based upon the available records furnished by Collier County and what was visible and accessible at the time of inspection. This report is based on the Land Development Code that is in effect on the date the report was prepared. Code regulations could be subject to change. While every attempt has been made to ensure the accuracy or completeness, and each subscriber to or user of this report understands that this department disclaims any liability for any damages in connection with its use. in addition, this department assumes no responsibility for the cost of correcting any unreported conditions. 9/25/2014 Page 2 of 2 l'o A),#o T ttq3 � ,y , Ata, , � OA1 70 -,. g. � ■ � « 6■r pilxrr - O. � .. . _ fy AS 7- 0.4r «. .: . e - � � . ¥ . . . . .. ■ 711 6077701 OVR . OPA.*,6AFjy 85 P - W. # / ¥ . r 0 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) 11 (CIRBS6 applicable) of IFR iqt ' if-rE I under oath, that I am the (choose one) (print name), as d W)IJ '2 (title, if (company, If applicable), swear or affirm sr applicantE]contract purchaseroand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County In accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize to act as our/my representative In any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, l declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. ye4�� Slfhature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 0 • The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on 6'44-17 (date) by d.5 asi 6-CLOWR (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known tome or who has produced f G5;t -Z60 -5 Z-3zy.-o V,t- . (type of identification) as identification. STAMP/SEAL ,e� v MARCIAIt KENDAU * `��S MY COMMISSION#GG 014954 y EMRES:AuvdA 2I 20 ?�,oF�� emlwflwieudp.tNotr�srNou CP\08-COA-00115U 55 REV 3/24/14 Signature of Notary Public L' • • `r W WHEREAS, Tim Hancock, of Vanasse & Daylor, LLP, representing Park East Development, LTD, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY the Board of County Commissioner of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property located in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 9628N, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO Ordinance Number 96.5, as amended, adopted on February 27, 1996, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. This Ordinance shat! become effective upon filing with the Department of State. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 9628N BY b�9��''kvol— CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED EUEC 29 � m REAL PROPERTY FROM "PUD" TO "PUD" PLANNED [w(j DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS PUD, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES FO GOLDEN GATE rei8«g��"0`w PARKWAY AT THE SANTA BARBARA CANAL CROSSING IN GOLDEN GATE CITY, 1N SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 13.33 ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 96.5, AS AMENDED, AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Tim Hancock, of Vanasse & Daylor, LLP, representing Park East Development, LTD, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY the Board of County Commissioner of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property located in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 9628N, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO Ordinance Number 96.5, as amended, adopted on February 27, 1996, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. This Ordinance shat! become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners o. County, Florida, this 114& day of how , 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT,E,•BROCK, Clerk Rt S Appro as,��:i'and Legal Sufficiency _z �Ld� 1 /-T��%4s�Gcl Magor M. Student Assistant County Attorney Q1admiw?UDA-2001-ar43I REI/ew BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONEp COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA IMAN JAM�� t. AN 1-02 This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's Office the 23g1ca,y of h'Affilw, 2= -Z - and acknowledgement of that fili g50CAQ ed this �_ day of Deputy—C' lerk�r�'' • • 0 • Founders Plaza A PLANNED.UNIT DEVELOPMENT PREPARED FOR: Park East Development, Ltd. 5395 Park Central Court Naples, FL 34109 PREPARED BY: Tim Hancock, AICP 3001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 206 Naples, FL 34103 Is REVISED BY COLLIER COUNTY: September 30, 2002 DATE PUD DOCUMENT FILED: January25, 2001 DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC: DATE APPROVED BY BCC: December 17, 2002 ORDINANCE NUMBER: 2002-68 EXHIBIT "A" • a L'i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS: 2 LIST OF EXHIBITS: 3 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE: 4 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION: 5 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS: 7 SECTION III COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN FOR TRACTS `A' AND `B': 9 SECTION IV COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN FOR TRACTS 'C', 'D', and 'E 14 SECTION V COMMERCIAL AREA PLAN FOR TRACT 'F' 17 SECTION VI DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS: 20 • 2 0 LIST OF EXHIBITS PUD MASTER PLAN: EXHIBIT "A" • • STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 0 The development of approximately 13.33 acres of property in Collier County, as a PIanned Unit Development to be known as Founders Plaza PUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The commercial facilities of the Founders Plaza PUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives for the following reasons: L The subject property is within the Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial District Land Use Designation as identified on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map, as described in the Land Use Designation Description Section of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan permits commercial land uses in this area. 2. The subject property is located along both sides of Golden Gate Parkway, between 53rd Street Southwest and 52"d Terrace Southwest. This strategic location allows the project superior access for the location of commercial and professional office land uses, as permitted by the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. 3. The subject property's location in relation to existing or proposed community facilities and services permits the development's intensity of land uses as required in Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element. 4. The project development is compatible and complimentary to existing and future • surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element. 5. The project development will assist in enhancing quality of life by improving the aesthetics of the project's neighborhood as described in Objective 1.4 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. 6. The project development is planned to protect the functioning of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element. 7. The project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations including the Growth Management Plan. 8. All final local development orders for this project are subject to Division 3.15, Adequate Public Facilities, of the Collier County Land Development Code. • 4 0 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of Founders Plaza PUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property being 13.33 acres, more or less, and located in Section 28, Township 49 South, and Range 26 East, is described as: Lots 4, 5 & 6, Block 206, Lots 1 — 4, Block 207, Lots 28- 31, Block 217 as recorded in Plat Book 5, Pages 124 through 134 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, together with Lots 1 -7 Block 243, Lots 1 -4, Block 262, and Lots 13- 16, Block 261, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Pages 135 -146 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP Lots 4, 5 and 6, Block 206 and Lots 1-4, Block 207 are owned by Bishop John J Nevins, Diocese of Venice, 1000 Pinebrook Road, Venice, Florida, 34292-1426. The balance of the property is owned by Park East Development, Ltd., 5395 Park Central Court, Naples, FL 34109. 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA A. The subject property is located on both sides of Golden Gate Parkway, between 53`d Street Southwest and 52"d Terrace Southwest in Golden Gate City (unincorporated Collier County), Florida. B. The subject property consists of 26 platted lots. The entire project site currently has PUD Zoning and is proposed to be rezoned to PUD. C. The properties identified on the PUD Master Plan (Exhibit A) as Tracts `A' and `B' have been developed for the parish, offices and parking for a church. This PUD document does not change any of the commitments or requirements as they relate to Tracts `A' and `B'. The intent of this PUD is to preserve the zoning on Tracts `A' and `B', and to modify the development standards on Tracts `C', `D', `E' and `F' to mirror recent changes to the Golden Gate Master Plan and to update the PUD Document with respect to those Tracts. r�'1 1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION • The project site is located within the Main Golden Gate Canal Sub -Basin. Water from the site flows westerly through the Santa Barbara Canal, southerly into the Gordon River, and finally into Naples Bay. Elevations within the project site range from 9 feet to 12 feet, with a majority of the site between 11 and 12 feet. The entire site is within Flood Zone "X" per Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel#120067 0415 D. Per the USDA Soil Maps, the predominant soil type on the site is Urban Land Holopaw Basinger Complex. Approximately the eastern 10 percent of the site is Urban Land Matlancha Limestone Substratum Boca Complex. Since the lots have been previously filled, the project is composed mostly of weeds with occasional Australian Pines, Brazilian Peppers and Slash Pines. Lot #16, Block 261, Unit 7, is the only lot with a significant amount of non -exotic trees, that being approximately 15 Slash Pines. The exotic species are in the process of being eliminated from the site. 1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Founders Plaza PUD will include a mixture of professional offices, an existing church and commercial uses. The Master Plan is illustrated graphically as Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan. A Land Use Summary indicating approximate land use acreage is shown on the Plan. 1.7 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Founders Plaza Planned Unit Development • Ordinance". • 2 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the project as well as other project relationships. 2.2 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of the Founders Plaza PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Document, PUD -Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the Collier County Land Development Code shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of Founders Plaza shall become part of the regulations, which govern the manner in which the PUD site may be developed. D. Unless specifically waived through any variance or waiver provisions from any other applicable regulations, the provisions of those regulations not otherwise provided for in this PUD remain in full force and effect. E. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Division 3.15, Adequate Public Facilities, of the Collier County Land Development Code at the earliest, or next, to occur of either final site development plan approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES A. The project Master Plan is illustrated graphically by Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan. B. Minor modifications to Exhibit "A" maybe permitted at the time of Site Development Plan approval, subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code or as otherwise permitted by this PUD Document. C. In addition to the various areas and specific items shown in Exhibit "A", easements such as (utility, private, semi-public) shall be established and/or vacated within or along the individual lots, as may be necessary. 7 2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS 0 A. Exhibit "A", FUD Master Plan, constitutes the required PUD Development Plan. Any division of the property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the subdivision regulations and the platting laws of the State of Florida. B. The provisions of Division 3.3, Site Development Plans, of the Land Development Code, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided in said Division 3.3 prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. C. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructure improvements regarding any dedications and method for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. 2.5 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Amendments may be made to the PUD as provided in Section 2.7.3.5 of the Land Development Code. • 0 0 SECTION III • COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN FOR TRACTS `A' AND `B' 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for Tracts `A' and `B' as shown on Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan. 3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated on the PUD Master Plan as Tracts `A' and 'B' are intended to provide professional offices and low intensity commercial land uses. These Tracts are located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, east of the Santa Barbara Canal, and are within the Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial District of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. 3.3 PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services (group 8721). 2. Business Services (groups 7311, 7313, 7322-7331, 7335-7338, 7361, 737I, 7373- 7376,7379). 3. Depository institutions (6021-6062). 4. Eating places [group 5812 (except carry -out restaurants; contract feeding; dinner theaters; drive-in and drive-through restaurants; fast food restaurants; food service, institutional; industrial feeding; pizzerias; restaurants, carry -out; submarine sandwich shops)]. 5. Engineering, architectural and surveying services (groups 8711- 8713). 6. Health services (groups 8011-8049). 7. Holding and other investment offices (groups 6712-6799). 9 8. Insurance carrier, agents and brokers (groups 6311-6399, 6411). 9. Legal services (group 8111). 10. Management and public relations services (groups 8741-8743, 8748). 11. Membership organizations (groups 8611, 8621). 12. Museums and art galleries (group 8412). 13. Churches (group 8661) with a maximum building height 45 feet. 14. Non -depository credit institutions (groups 6141-6163). 15. Personal services (groups 7221, 7291). 16. Public administration (groups 9111-9199, 9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661). 17. Real estate (groups 6512-6514, 6519, 6531-6553). 18. Research, development and testing services (group 8732). 19. Security and commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges, and services (groups 6211- 6289). 20. Transportation services (group 4724). 21. Veterinary services (group 0742, excluding outside kenneling). 22. Any other commercial use or professional service, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). B. Accessory Uses: Uses and structures that is accessory and incidental to the Permitted Uses within this PUD Document except for the overnight parking and storage of commercial vehicles in Tract "A". 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS • A. Minimum Lot Area: Twelve thousand (12,000) square feet. B. Minimum Lot Width: One hundred (100) feet. C. Minimum Yards: 1. Principal Structures: a. Front yards along Golden Gate Parkway — Forty (40) feet. b. Front yards along all other streets — Twenty-five (25) feet. c. Side yards between two lots within Tract `A' of the PUD — Ten (10) feet. d. Side yard abutting the PUD perimeter — Twenty-five (25) feet. e. Side yard abutting the Santa Barbara Canal — Twenty (20) feet. f. Rear yards — Twenty-five (25) feet. 2. Accessory Structures: Setbacks shall be as required by Division 2.6.2 of the Land Development Code in effect at time of building permit application, except small, architecturally designed canopies, intended to provide shelter from the sun and rain for pedestrians within designated pedestrian rest areas, shall only be required to be set back from the external boundaries of the PUD, a distance of ten (10) feet. • 10 0 D. Distance Between Principal Structures: Twenty (20) feet. • E. Minimum Floor Area: One thousand (1;000) square feet for the principal structure on the first habitable floor. F. Maximum Height: For principal structures twenty-five (25) feet plus ten (10) feet for any parking area beneath the structures. For churches maximum building height shall not exceed forty-five (45) feet. G. Off -Street Parking and Loading Requirements: Shall be consistent with Division 2.3 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of site development plan approval. H. Open Space Requirements: A minimum of thirty (30) percent open space, as described in Section 2.2.20.3.5 of the Land Development Code, shall be maintained for the developed parcels of land within the PUD. The petitioner shall submit data at the time of each Site Development Plan application that the subject parcel has a minimum of thirty (30) percent open space or that the subject parcel measured cumulatively with all previously developed parcels within the PUD will total a minimum of thirty (30) percent open space of the cumulative area. I. Landscaping and Buffering Requirements: 1. A ten (10) foot wide Buffer "X" shall be constructed around the perimeter of Tracts `A' and `B', excluding driveways and sidewalks perpendicular to the adjacent road rights-of-way, and along the Santa Barbara Canal. Such Buffer "X" shall require one (1) shade tree per twenty (20) linear feet and a double hedgerow along its entirety, except where the PUD boundary abuts property that is not within the Golden Gate Professional Office Commercial District. Where the FUD boundary abuts property not within the Golden Gate Professional Office Commercial District, a fence or wall shall be constructed that is at least six (6) feet in height with a single hedge row on each side of the fence or waII. Fences and walls shall meet the requirements of Section 2.6.11 of the Land Development Code. Such fences shall be wooden, at least ninety-five percent (95%) opaque and designed and maintained to provide an architecturally finished appearance on both sides. Twenty-five (25) percent of such shade trees shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet in height, with a four (4) foot spread, and a one and three-quarter (1.75) inch caliper at time of planting and that will have a minimum canopy of fifteen (15) feet at time of maturity. The remaining seventy- five percent of such shade trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height, with a three (3) foot spread, a caliper of one and one-half (1.5) inches at time of planting, and will have a minimum canopy of fifteen (15) feet at maturity. All shrubs shall meet the requirements for shrubs as described in Section 2.4.4 of the Land Development Code. 11 12 2. Buffering shall not be required between platted lots or projects within the PUD or along the Santa Barbara Canal. 3. A minimum of ten (10) percent of the gross vehicular use area shall be landscaped. Required trees within the Parking Lot (Internal) Landscaping Areas shall be one (1) tree per seventy-five (75) square feet of Internal Landscaping Areas. These trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height with a minimum caliper of one and one-half (1.5) inches at time of planting and have a minimum canopy of fifteen (15) feet at maturity. All other requirements of Section 2.4.5 of the Land Development Code shall apply. 4. For building perimeter landscaping, each building shall have one (1) tree, four (4) shrubs, and twenty (20) square feet of planting area for each two hundred (200) square feet of first floor building area. These trees and plantings shall be planted in the areas adjacent to such buildings prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy. The trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height with a minimum caliper of one and one-half (1.5) inches at time of planting and have a minimum canopy of fifteen (15) feet at time of maturity. Planting areas shall consist of landscaped areas, raised planters or planter boxes with a minimum of one (1) shrub for each ten (10) square feet of planting area. 5. At the time of preliminary site development plan application, the site plan shall show a front pedestrian rest area for each platted lot, including any fraction greater than one-half (1/2) of a platted lot, and a rear pedestrian rest area for each building. (a) Front pedestrian rest areas, at a minimum, shall include the following: • two (2) park benches; two (2) native shade trees and six (6) shrubs that are not counted towards any other landscaping requirements; a brick paver block or Bomanite (brick or stone design) sidewalk leading from the sidewalk along Golden Gate Parkway through the project's first row of parking; and one (1) architecturally compatible light post not exceeding sixteen (16) feet in height; all located within a minimum area of four hundred (400) square feet. The areas not utilized for these requirements shall be landscaped. The trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height with a minimum caliper of one and, one-half (1.5) inches at time of planting, that will have a minimum canopy of fifteen (I5) feet at maturity. (b) Rear pedestrian rest areas, at a minimum, shall provide the following: two (2) park benches; two (2) native shade trees and six (6) shrubs that are not counted towards any other landscaping requirements; a brick, paver block or Bomanite (brick or stone design) sidewalk leading from the adjacent building to the park benches; and one (1) architecturally compatible light post not exceeding sixteen (16) feet in height; all located within a minimum area of three hundred (300) square feet. The areas not utilized for these requirements shall be landscaped. Such minimum area shall be located adjacent to any building. The trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height with 12 • a minimum caliper of one and one-half (1.5) inches at time of planting that will have a minimum canopy of fifteen (15) feet at maturity. (c) Projects on lots within Tract'B" may relocate rear pedestrian rest areas within that same Tract, such as along the Canal, as long as all of the required amenities are provided. 6. The architecturally compatible lighting shall not exceed sixteen (16) feet in height and shall be provided along the rear of the lots previously occupied by alleys or cul-de-sacs. Such lighting facilities shall not create glare onto adjacent residential properties. n U • D. SIGNS: All project signs shall be consistent with Division 2.5 of the Land Development Code 13 SECTION IV 0 COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN FOR TRACTS `C', `D' &E' 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify specific development standards for Tracts `C', `D' and `E' as identified on Exhibit A, PUD Master PIan. 4.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Tracts `C', `D' and `E' on the PUD Master Plan are intended to provide professional offices and commercial land uses consistent with the Golden Gate Master Plan. These Tracts total +/- 6.85 of the +/-13.33 acres of the PUD and are located northwest, southeast and southwest of the intersection of the Golden Gate Parkway and the Santa Barbara Canal. All tracts lie within the Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial District, 4.3 PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitted principal uses and structures for Tracts "C","D", & "E" as shown on Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan: 1) All permitted uses and structures listed under Section 3.3.A of • this Document, except 44. 2) Apparel and accessory stores (groups 5611-5699). 3) Auto and home supply stores (groups 5531 and 7549, auto accessory dealers -retail, automobile parts dealers -retail and speed shops -retail only), 4) Eating places (group 5812, except carry out establishments, drive through only establishments, commissary restaurants, concession stands, contract feeding, food service -institutional, hamburger stands, hot dog stands, snack shops, soft drink stands and tea rooms, ice cream stands, industrial feeding and refreshment stands). 5) ' Food stores (groups 5411-5499 except convenience food stores - retail, grocery stores and supermarkets). 6) General merchandise stores (groups 5311-5399). 7) Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment stores (groups 5712- 5736). 8) Libraries (group 8231). 9) Miscellaneous repair services (groups 7629-7631 no electronic repair, except computer repair only in conjunction with sales.) 10) Miscellaneous retail (groups 5912-5963 except liquor stores, pawn shops and building materials 5992-5999). 11) Paint, glass and wallpaper stores (group 5231). 14 • 12) Personal services (groups 7212, 7221-7261, and 7291 except coin operated laundries, beauty shops and barber shops.) 13) United States Postal Service (group 4311). 4.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Minimum Lot Area: Twelve thousand (12,000) square feet. B. Minimum Lot Width: One hundred (100) feet. C. Minimum Yards (Setbacks): 1. Front yards along Golden Gate Parkway: Forty (40) feet. 2. Front yards along all other streets: Twenty-five (25) feet. 3. Side yards between development tracts: Ten (10) feet. 4. Side yards abutting the PUD perimeter: Fifteen (15) feet and 25 feet when abutting residential zoned properties. 5. Side yards abutting the Santa Barbara Canal: Fifteen (15) feet. 6. Rear yards: Twenty-five (25) feet. 7. Accessory structures: Setbacks shall be as required by Division 2.6.2 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application, except small, architecturally designed canopies, intended to provide shelter from the sun and rain for pedestrians, shall only be required to be set back from the • external boundaries of the PUD a distance of ten (10) feet. 8. Between Principal Structures: Fifteen (15) feet. D. Minimum Floor Area: 1,000 square feet for the principal structure, on the first floor. E. Height: Thirty-five (35) feet for the principal structures with no parking facilities allowed beneath structures. 0 F. Off-street Parking and Loading: 1. As required by Division 2.3 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. 2. Each phase of development shall provide the minimum required amount of parking facilities required by Section 2.3 of the Land Development Code. G. Open Space Requirements: A minimum of thirty (30) percent open space, as described in Section 2.2.20.3.5 of the Land Development Code, shall be maintained for the developed parcels of land within the PUD. The petitioner shall submit data at the time of each site development plan application that the subject parcel provides a minimum of thirty (30) percent open space or that the subject parcel measured cumulatively with all previously developed parcels within the PUD will total a minimum of thirty (30) percent open space of the cumulative area. 15 H. Landscaping and Buffering requirements: • 1. A ten -foot wide buffer "Y" shall be constructed around the perimeter of Tracts "C", "D and "E". Such Buffer "Y" shall include one shade tree per twenty (20) linear feet and a double hedgerow along its entirety. Hedges shall be a minimum of 24 inches in height at the time of planting. 2. Where the PUD boundary abuts multi -family zoning, the required double hedgerow shall be a minimum of 36" in height at the time of planting and shall achieve 80% opacity within one year of planting. 3. Where the PUD boundary abuts single-family zoning, the required buffering shall be a minimum Type C buffer (with a six foot tall fence) as required by Section 2.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 4. Buffer areas shall not be required between platted lots or projects within the PUD or along the Santa Barbara Canal. 5. In order to emphasize the,connection between the project and the surrounding community, pedestrian accesses will be provided from the rear of the project, where it directly abuts a public right- of-way. Access from sidewalks within the Golden Gate Parkway right-of-way shall also be provided for pedestrians. These accesses will be lighted and landscaped with a minimum of two shade trees and shall include a bench adjacent to each access. • One access shall be provided for every 300 feet of frontage along Golden Gate Parkway right-of-way. 6. Projects on lots within Tracts C, D, & E may relocate rear pedestrian rest areas within that same tract, such as along the canal, as long as all of the required amenities are provided. I. Signs: Signage shall be in accordance with Division 2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of final site development plan submittal or building permit application. J. Fast-food restaurants shall shield all ordering devices and/or windows where orders are taken from view from Golden Gate Parkway. K. Where this document does not address development standards, the standards found in the most similar zoning district in the Land Development Code shall apply. 16 AGENDA ITEM 3-E Co e' rCounty STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JULY, 27 2017 SUBJECT: PDI-PL20170000444, THE LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (APUD) APPLICANT/AGENT: Applicant: Aeent: Lords Way 30 LLC Lindsay F. Robin 7742 Alico Road Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Fort Myers, FL 33192 28100 Bonita Grande # 305 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 The petitioner requests that the Hearing Examiner consider an insubstantial change to the Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, Ordinance Number 14-11, as amended, to add one deviation relating to parking, to modify one existing deviation relating to fences, walls and landscape buffers, to reduce the minimum side yard setbacks and distance between structures for single-family, single-family attached, and two- family and single-family zero lot line principal structures, and to modify Exhibit C-2, Typical Lot Layout. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject 30f acre property is located on the south side of The Lord's Way, approximately one-quarter mile east of Collier Boulevard, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (See Location Map on the following page.) Page i of 11 The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, PDI-PL20170000444 July 13, 2017 175 Location Map Petition Number: PL20170000444 Zoning Map 0 , ,0 /LI I �I .nil I� I O�wO it ��olllno��io►o\o,� o'ae�aess�t��, Petition Number: PL20170000444 Zoning Map ZONED: MPUD 30' R.O.W. RESERVATION BY ADJACENT PROPERTY EXISTING OWNER FOR FUTURE ROADWAY EXPANSION GRAVEL ROAD �-.. 1 non•S WAY ---�_ tvB �IPERIMETER L I BUFFER 0, L z gC I w� I TRACT 'R' Residential a� I n 1 I < I I w I TRACT N if m Q v ,`. I ¢ Lake aglb I tai I m6a �6< I TRACT 'R' ?:p Residential 20' TYPE 'D' PERIMETER BUFFER I F�6 1 ♦ � � S TRACT .P,. .. . WSW . . Vre9erve z�vl ZONED: A I— COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT 20' TYPE 'C' PERIMETER BUFFER 'XISTING GRAVEL a x W N A V 0 200 SCALE IN FEET 09/16/2013 12/13/1013 12/17/1013 01/14/2014 Page 5 of 11 HU01301302TWNPOSTCCPCLL.a W.y3GA.RPUD(PUDZ-PL30130000A27)1-17.2014.a tW ES LOCATIONS OF PUD MAXIMUM PERMITTED DENSITY- ZJ DEM MONS 1. 3 AND C 75UNITS NATIVE VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE CEM 11ON 2 IMIL OCCIR LAND USE SUMMARYwi:w x.,I. yam. W.. m.m, Au. TIMOIOIOUT PW AND w ..Ii-- DEMA7I0IN 5 MAY OCCUR P 1 I s .1 la.m . o.xo -vas k. wouFwe wlm. A TO E DETERMINED ww.r I>•I.CIao' I a'x9 Ix.a w nue. vwulwa - a.]I. u. • AMENITIES STE LOCATION. Mf9FMF 17MC1 'V'I ].]1 ILT pu U. IT9aai 'l'1 ..91 N.O a0. 19. 6f � 1B.m6.w Rpo1.M FUFOFar Ic.o.F.l o.w o. n ro.. awn vwwwe • Ie.w v<w. LMS WAY 90 AID WW woNI al a0dlw0 M�(�2�MB/ R 3H1 FFW �Y+A81� PLAN ROAN OwlDmb d DOWT C ` C51 �E�� AM1MYaMn X0.1772 Page 5 of 11 HU01301302TWNPOSTCCPCLL.a W.y3GA.RPUD(PUDZ-PL30130000A27)1-17.2014.a PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD (Ordinance number 14-11) was approved on March 11, 2014. (Please see Attachment.) The RPUD Ordinance allows for up to 75 residential dwelling units including single- family, single-family attached, two-family and single-family zero lot line, and townhomes or multi- family. The purpose of this PDI request is to: - reduce the side yard setback from 6 feet to 5 feet for single-family, single-family attached and two-family/single-family zero lot line dwelling types; - clarify that the front yard setback from the lot line is a minimum of 20 feet when lots have front -loaded garages for single-family, single-family attached and two-family/single-family zero lot line dwelling types; - reduce the minimum distance between structures from 12 feet to 10 feet for single-family, two-family and single-family zero lot line dwelling types; - reduce the minimum distance between structures from 20 feet to 10 feet for single-family attached dwelling types; - modify Exhibit C-2, "Typical Lot Layout" to reflect the modifications to Exhibit B, "Development Standards Table;" - modify Exhibit E, "List of Requested Deviations from the LDC," Deviation number 3, to allow a 16 -foot tall perimeter wall or fence and berm combination along the eastern perimeter of the project boundary adjacent to the Swamp Buggy Grounds; and - add Deviation number 6 related to reduced amenity parking. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: The Lord's Way right-of—way, then multi -family units under construction with a zoning designation of First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus MPUD East: Swamp Buggy Grounds with a zoning designation of Hacienda Lakes MPUD South: Undeveloped land with a zoning designation of Agriculture West: Undeveloped land with a zoning designation of Agriculture Page 4 of 11 The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPLID, PDI-PL20170000444 July 13, 2017 AERIAL PHOTO DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking a modification to Deviation number 3 of Exhibit E of this PUD as well as add one new deviation, Deviation number 6. Please note, Deviation number 3 shows the added language underlined and the deleted language as a strike thru: Deviation number 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.0 Fences and Walls and Section 4.06.02.C.3, Types of Buffers, which limit the fence or wall height to 6 feet, to allow a perimeter wall or fence and berm in combination up to thirteen (13) feet in height, and where adiacent to the Swamp Page 5 of 11 The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, PDI-PL20170000444 July 13, 2017 Petitioner's Rationale: The requested modification to this deviation will allow the Applicant to provide a wall, fence, berm, or fence/wall/berm combination to screen the residential project along the perimeter of the eastern project boundary that is adjacent to the Swamp Buggy attraction. This deviation will enhance the project's compatibility with the adjacent use, while still allowing the flexibility that has been previously approved. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI, which directly abuts the project to the east, has had similar enhancements approved. The proposed 16 foot fence/wall/berm combination will mitigate potential visual and noise impacts from the neighboring tracts within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI to the east. Directly to the east of the subject property is Tract A within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI, which is the Swamp Buggy attraction tract. This is an intensive recreational use that generates noise involving motorized vehicles during frequent events throughout the year. The proposed increase in wall/berm height will allow for additional visual screening between the proposed uses, while ensuring a quality design aesthetic via screening of the wall by required perimeter plantings. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: The applicant requests to allow a perimeter wall or fence and berm in combination up to sixteen (16) feet in height where adjacent to the Swamp Buggy Grounds. The original deviation allowed a fence or wall and berm height of 13 feet. The presence of an increased wall or fence and berm height will create a physical separation allowing the proposed development to keep its residential feel and will buffer it from noise generated from the Swamp Buggy Grounds. Due to these facts, it is Staff's opinion that an increase of 3 feet over the approved deviation of 13 feet for the property located on the easterly portion of this property is a supportable deviation. Therefore, Zoning Review Staff recommends approval, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Deviation number 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.G which allows parking spaces for recreation facilities to be computed at 25 percent of the normal requirements where a majority of dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities, to allow the parking spaces for the recreation facilities to be computed at 25 percent of the normal requirements where a majority of the dwelling units are within 500 feet of the recreation facilities. Petitioner's Rationale: The amenity center and recreational facilities are not within 300' of the majority of residential units, but more than half of the residential units are within a 500' distance of the amenity. With majority of the units Page 6 of 11 The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, PDI-PL20170000444 July 13, 2017 within 500' of the recreational facilities, or 1/10`h of a mile, which is generally accepted as "within walking distance". Additionally, due to the relatively small size of the site, clustered development footprint, and internal sidewalk system, the development has been designed to encourage pedestrian access to the proposed recreational area. Furthermore, the project is a single-family residential community where homes may have their own pools reducing the need for residents to drive to the pool and amenity center. Staff Analysis and Recommendations: Staff concurs that the size and master plan layout of this project awards itself to a more clustered development. Thus, travel to the amenity center from any point of the development allows for a minimal travel period via alternative modes of transportation, i.e. walking, biking, etc. Staff finds the petitioner's deviation and rationale supportable for this project. Therefore, Zoning Review Staff recommends approval, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Planning Staff states that the proposed PDI may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. (Please see Attachment.) Zoning, Environmental, Landscape, Fire, Public Utilities, and Transportation Staff have reviewed the petition and are in agreement with the proposed changes. PUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE CRITERIA: Section 10.02.13.E.1 and 2 of the Land Development Code sets forth the criteria by which insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD document are to be reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each criterion of 10.02.13.E.1 have been listed as follows: a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? No, the request will not impact the existing PUD boundary. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? No, the request will not increase the approved density or intensity, or the height of proposed buildings. C. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five (5) acres in area? Page 7 of 11 The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, PDI-PL20170000444 July 13, 2017 No, the request will not result in a decrease of preserve, conservation, recreation, or open space areas. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? No, the requests do not impact the size of non-residential areas or proposed to relocate such areas within the PUD boundary. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities? No, the request will not result in an impact to the development in terms of traffic and public facilities. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? No, the request will not generate a higher level of vehicular traffic. No change in land use activities is being requested. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No, the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge. The proposed setback change may potentially increase individual parcel lot coverage by allowing the construction of larger structures; however it will not alter the overall development stormwater requirements or standards. Additionally, the developer must comply with the water management requirements in place when local development orders are sought regardless of what is shown on the Development Standards Section or the Master Plan. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? No, the request will not modify any existing uses that would impact any surrounding land uses or that would be incompatible. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses? Page 8 of 11 The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, PDI-PL20170000444 July 13, 2017 No, the request does not impact the project's compliance with the Growth Management Plan. j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec. 380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)9e)2., F.S., and any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Sec. 2.7.3.5.4 or Sec. 2.7.3.5.6 of this Code. No, the request does not require a determination that the change will result in a substantial deviation. The request will not increase density/intensity, traffic generation, non-residential land uses, or decrease environmental areas. k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.? No, the request is not a substantial modification to the PUD, and may be processed as a PDI pursuant to the LDC and Administrative Code. FINDINGS OF FACT: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.E.2 also requires an evaluation of the findings and criteria used for the original PUD application. The staff report for the original rezone petition contained the PUD and Rezoning Findings from LDC Subsection 10.02.13.13.5 and 10.02.08.17, respectively. (Please see Attachment.) This amendment does not negatively impact any of those findings. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The agents conducted a NIM on May 3, 2017; no members of the public were present. (Please see Attachment.) COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report on July 13, 2017. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI-PL20170000444, The Lord's Way 30 Acre PUD. Page 9 of 11 The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, PDI-PL20170000444 July 13, 2017 Attachments: A. Proposed Ordinance Revisions B. Ordinance number 14-11 C. Comp Planning Consistency Review D. PUD and Rezone Findings E. NIM Memo Page 10 of 11 The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, PDI-PL20170000444 July 13, 2017 PREPARED BY: l� NANCY CH, Aicp DAT FOR RACHEL ASLEY,SENIOR PLANNER ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: RAY BEt5tOWS, MANAGER DATE ZONING SERVICES SECTION 7-12 MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION Page 11 or 11 The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, PD1-PL20170000444 July 11, 2017 *************gym** EXHIBIT B LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD Exhibit B Table 1 below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD Residential Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the Land Development Code in effect as of the date of approval of the Site Development Plan or Subdivision plat. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE I PERIMETER PUD SETBACK: The perimeter PUD setback shall be, at a minimum, equal to the required width of perimeter landscape buffers. PLATTO RESIDkINTLAL OR AMENITY CENTER LOTS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE- FAMILY SINGLE- FAMILY ATTACHED TWO-FAMILY& SINGLE-FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE TOWNHOMEor MULTI- FAMILY CLUBHOUSE/ RECREATION BUILDINGS PWN4C1PAL T"0CT!IM , MINIMUM LOT AREA 4, 800 S. F. PER UNIT 1,800 S.F. PER UNIT 4,000 S.F. PER UNIT 10,000 S.F. PER BLDG. N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 40 FEET 30 FEET 40 FEET N/A N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,200 S.F. 1,200 S.F. PER UNIT 1,200 S.F. PER UNIT 1,000 S.F. PER UNIT N/A MINIMUM FRONT YARD 20/23 FEET' 20/23 FEET' 20/23 FEET' 23 FEET N/A MINIMUM SIDE YARD 56 FEET 0 OR 56 FEET 2 0 OR 56 FEEV 0 OR 15 FEET 20 FEET3 MINIMUM REAR YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 15 FEET' MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 104-2 FEET 1029 FEET 101-2 FEET 20 FEET 12 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT -ZONED 35 FEET NTE 2 STORIES 35 FEET NTE 2 STORIES 35 FEET NTE 2 STORIES 50 FEET NTE 4 STORIES 35 FEET NTE 2 STORIES MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT - ACTUAL 42 FEET 42 FEET 42 FEET 57 FEET 42 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTS FRONT SPS SPS SPS 23 FEET SPS SIDE SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS REAR 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONED & ACTUAL S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. NTE= Not to Exceed; S. P. S.= Same as Principal Structures; BLDG.= Building; S.F.= Square Feet; N/A= Not Applicable General: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth in Exhibit B below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines or between structures. Condominium and/ or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Footnotes: 'Lots fronting on two streets shall provide a full front yard setback along the street with the shorter frontage, and a minimum 10' front yard setback along the other street frontage. Front entry garages shall be at least 20 feet from the lot line, and at least 23 feet from back of sidewalk. Where side entry garages are provided, the driveway shall be designed in such a manner so that a parked vehicle shall not conflict with the sidewalk, however, in no case shall the front setback be less than 10'. At time ofplatting, intersections subiect to the secondary front yard setback shall demonstrate compliance with sight distance triangles as set forth in LDC Section 6.06.05. 256' minimum side setbacks for single- family attached, two-family and single- family zero lot line must be accompanied by another 56' minimum side setback on adjoining lot to achieve minimum 1044' separation. 3Should an" Amenity Center/Clubhouse" be constructed, it may be partially constructed up to lake edge and a deck area may extend into (over) the lake, in accordance with the permit requirements or limitations of the South Florida Water Management District. Should the Amenity Center/Clubhouse be constructed up to lake edge, or contain a deck area extending (over) the lake, the normally required buffer area and landscape plantings shall redistributed to the other buffers on the Amenity Center/Clubhouse site. Refer to Deviation No. 5. 4Rear yards adjacent to the Lake Maintenance Easement (or tract) or adjacent to a perimeter landscape buffer shall not be subject to the rear yard accessory structure setback. Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD Last Revised: June 22, 2017 Attachment A Words s4�Hslc-thfetigk are deleted; Words underlined are added LAKE CONTROL --- ELEV. 20' LAKE M.E. 25' SETBACK PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE TO PRESERVE 5' MIN. FOR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED, Y OR 5' FOR SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED, TOWNHOUSE, TWO-FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE. 5' MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ANOTHER S MIN. SETBACK ON ADJOINING LOT TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM 10' SEPARATION. PROPERTY 20' MIN. FROM LOT LINE123' FROM BACK LINE OF SIDEWALK FOR FRONT -ENTRY GARAGE MAY BE REDUCED FOR SIDE ENTRY GARAGE IF DESIGNED SO THAT A PARKED VEHICLE WILL NOT ENCROACH UPON THE SIDEWALK. IN NO CASE SHALL THE FRONT SETBACK OF A SIDE ENTRY GARAGE BE LESS THAN 10'. Nl� LORD'S WAY 30 Ac RPUD TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT PREPARED FOR: LORD'S WAY 30, LLC PROPERTY LINE r:l �, IO'SETBACK ACCESORY STRUCTURE TO ACCESSORY PRESERVE STRUCTURE (E.G. POOL) PROPERTY LINE RESIDENCE 5' MIN. 5' MIN SIDEWALK ROADWAY SIDEWALK NOT TO SCALE EXHIBIT C-2 FILENAME: 65301E020I.dwg SHEET: 101`1 NF IMENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANOSCAEE ARCHITECTURE 28100 BI GRANDE DRIVE - SUITE 305 BONFTA SPRINGS, FL 34135 P; 239405.7777 F: 239405-7899 EMAIL- Info@wakimpengli—ring.00m EXHIBIT E LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC PERIMETER WALL/FENCE HEIGHT 3. Deviation No. 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.0 Fences and Walls and Section 4.06.02.C.3, Types of Buffers, which limit the fence or wall height to 6 feet, to allow a perimeter wall or fence and berm in combination up to thirteen (13) feet in height, and where adjacent to the Swamp Buggy on the eastern property line, allow a perimeter wall or fence and berm in combination up to sixteen (16) feet in height. 4fteluding an eio (9) feet fenee or- wall installed on �he perimeter- benn, "ieh will be between 2 and 5 F of i height). AMENITY PARKING 6. Deviation No. 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04 G. which allows harking spaces for recreation facilities to be computed at 25 percent of the normal requirements where a majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities, to allow the parking spaces for the recreation facilities to be computed at 25 percent of the normal requirements where a majority of the dwelling units are within 500 feet of the recreation facilities. Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD Words stt:uek thfougk are deleted; Last Revised: June 22, 2017 Words underlined are added ORDINANCE NO. 14-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO ALLOW UP TO 75 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS AND A CLUBHOUSE FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE LORD'S WAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951) IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONSISTING OF 301 ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PUDZ-PL20130000827) WHEREAS, Robert J. Mulhere of Hole Montes, Inc. representing Lord's Way 30, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (APUD) for a 30.01 acre parcel to be known as the Lord's Way 30 Acre Planned Unit Development in accordance with Exhibits A through F, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance No. 200441, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD PUDZ-PL20130000927—Rev. 121/14 Ngc 1 oft Attachment B PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote f the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this Iday of ��j2014. S. 4c9...... ATT . C, DWI-�' E;$k5`GLERK 1 r-_ By: Aced to l signaturellO - Approved as to form and legality: 6, 1 + b 6rti`i� H idi Ashton-Cicko 1�v, Managing Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION] COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: �= 4, - - TOM HENNIN hairman Attachment: Exhibit A — List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B — Development Standards Exhibit C — Master Plan Exhibit C-1 — ROW Section Exhibit C-2 — Typical Lot Layout Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E — List of Deviations Exhibit F — List of Developer Commitments CP113-CPS-01243129 This ordinance filed with the Secretory of State's Office the _ day of -- and acknowledaement of that filing received this — day of 9y o Cws Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD PUDi-PL20130000827–Rev. 121/14 Page 2 oft EXHIBIT A LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD PERMITTED USES 1. RESIDENTL4L/PRAC[ R No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: I. Single-family detached dwellings. 2. Single-family attached dwellings. 3. Two-family and single-family zero lot line. 4. Townhouse and multi -family. 5. A recreational building or clubhouse, with typical accessory recreational facilities shall be permitted which serves the residents and their guests. The location of such recreational building and facilities shall be denoted on the first subdivision plat or Site Development Plan for the project, as the case may be, prior to sale of any platted lots or condominium units. 6. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing listed of permitted principal uses, determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (" BZA") or the Hearing Examiner ("HEX") by the process outlined in the Land Development Code C'LDC"). B. Accessory Uses: I. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal residential uses permitted in this RPUD, including recreational facilities, such m swimming pools and screen enclosures. 2. Essential services as set forth under Land Development Code, Section 2.01.03. 3. Guardhouses, gatehouses and access control structures 4. Temporary construction, sales and administrative offices for the developer and developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas, and related uses, subject to the procedures for a temporary use permit provided in the Land Development Code. Page 1 of 1 I j H02013120130MWIVOSTCCFN nfs Way 30 Arne MD(PUM.P1.201300001127) 1404014.4wx M 2. PRESERVE/PRACTP The minimum required native vegetation preservation is 2.73 acres (25% of 10.93 acres of existing native vegetation). The `R" Preserve Tract provides for the preservation of 3.51 acres of native vegetation. This exceeds the minimum required amount of native vegetation preservation by 0.78 acres. 3. MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS The maximum dwelling units shall be seventy-five (75) provided that 30 of the maximum 75 units are obtained through a transfer of development rights in accordance with the requirements set forth in the LDC and GMP (Growth Management Plan). Page 2 of 11 Hd2013U013023MAPOST MPCUdy Way 30 Acre MO(MDZ.PL201300m627)1.178010E x EXHIBIT B LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD Exhibit B Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD Residential Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the Land Development Code in effect as of the date of approval of the Site Development Plan or Subdivision plat. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE I PERIMETER PUD SETBACK: The perimeter PUD setback shall be. at a minimum, equal to the required width of perimeter landscape buffers. PLATTED RESIDENiTAL OR AMENITY CENTER LOTS DEVELOPMENT SIANDARDS SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED TWO-FAMILY& SINGLE-FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE TOWNHOMEor MULTI- FAMILY CLUBHOUSE/ RECREATION BUILDINGS PRINCRALSFRUCTURES _ MINIMUM LOT AREA 4.800 S.F. PER UNIT 1,800 S.F. PER UNIT 4,000 S.F. PER UNIT 10,001 S.F. PER BLDG. N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 40 FEET 30 FEET 40 FEET N/A NIA MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,200 S.F 1,200 S.F PER UNIT 1,200 S.F. PER UNIT L(100 S.F. PER (IMT NIA MINIMUM FRONT YARD 231F 23 FEET 23 FEET 23 FEET N/A MINIMUM SIDE YARD 6FEET 0 O 6 FEEV COB 6FEET 0or15FEET 20 FEE MINIMUM REAR YARD 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 15 FEE MINIMUM PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 12FEET 20FEET 12FEET 20 FEET 12FEET MAIMUM BUILDING HEIGHI -ZONED 35 FEET NTE s STORIES 35 FEET NTE 2 STORIES 35 FEET NTE 2 STORIES 50FEETNTE 4 STORIES 35 FEET NTE 2 STORIES MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT - ACTUAL 42 FEET 42 FEET 42 FEET 57 FEET 42 FEET ACCESS YSPRUCnMU FRONT SPS SPS SPS 23 FEET SPS SIDE SPS SPS SPS SYS SPS REAR 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET to FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT ZONED & ACTUAL S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. NTE -Not to Exceed; S.P.S. =Sana as Principal Structures; BLDG. = Building; S.F. — Square Fun; N/A =Net Applicable General: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set Forth in Exhibit B below shall be understood Is, be in relation to individual pawl or lot boundary lines or between structures. Condominium and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Foomows: 1 Lots fronting on two meats shell provide a full front yard setback along the street with the shorter frontage, and a minimum 10' front yard setback along the other street trono c. Front entry garages shall be at lean 23 feet from back of sidewalk where side enq garages are provided, the driveway shall be designed in such a manner an that a perked vehicle shall not wn0ict with the sidewalk, however, in an case shall the front setback be less than 10'. Page 3 of I 1 H:U(113 13023\WPPOST CCP@ord's Way 30 Acre RPUD (PUDZ-PL201300W627)1-17-201/ docx 0 a 6' minimum side setbacks for single-family attached, two -firmly and single-family um lot It. most be accompanied by another 6' minimum side setback on adjoining lot to achieve minimum 12' sepxration. 3 Should an `Amenity Center/Clubhouse" be constructed, it may be partially constructed up to lake edge and a deck area may extend into (over) the lake, in accordance with the permit requirements or limitations of the South Florida Water Management District Should the Amenity Center/Clubhouse be concocted up to lake edge, or contain a deck ares extending (over) the lak, the mrmally required buffer arca and landscape Plantings shall redistributed to the other buffers on the Annuity Center/Clubhouse site. Refer to Deviation No. 5. s Rear yards adjacent to the Lake Maintenance Easement (or tract) or adjacent to a perimeter landscape buffer shall not be subject to the rem yard accessory structure setback. Page 4 of I 1 Way 30 Acre RMD(PU-PL20130000V7)I-17-2014A x C Page 5 of I 1 KV0132013=WPIPOSTCCP 's Way 30 Acre RPDD(PUDZ-PL2013X](XS27)btl801411ocx (Af ZONED: MPUD 30' R.D.W. RESERVATION BY ADJACENT PROPERTY EXISTING OWNER FOR FUTURE ROADWAY EXPANSION GRAVEL ROAD - THE LORD'S WAY----" -__ --`-20' ` COUNTY TME D. I 1 UTILITY 10' TYPE 'A' PERIMETER I III EASEMENT PERIMETER BUFFER O e I BUFFER F i I I I 20' TYPE 'C' PERIMETER BUFFER w> I TRACT 'R' ro I Residential I I�EXISTING GRAVEL �i III ROAD wZ III � T I R2 I � m it 1- c ¢ m m Q m I w TRACT III Qv L. Ili I Lake T III u�a I jll a W I `N� 200 G 110 �I iI I : P /� Residential 4 � ISCALE IN FEET ♦ ♦ T F p�Q I ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ W ♦ III OI 41M4 WSWs OCW I ♦ i r Y dnRE�cI P'� I . ♦ new «♦.��.f. -._F • ♦ I ♦ I III ZONED: A MAXIMUM PERMITTED DENSITY- 41DENOTES LOCATIONS OF PUD TIONS 1. 3 AND 4. TSUNITSp NATIVE VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE OEMATNIN 2 YML OCCUR LAND USE SUMMARY Eu^Lw 61E. m ..�:a.. 16.69. .<. TIp0001OUT PUD AND N661..6 weuY. .Yel.e� . DEMATION S MAY OCLVR IN 36L gy Mol fiLaq IYalw Vepmlon CS. le.u. e.a. 9. n. .c. a.e•:..e x..:.e A ro BE DETERMINEDLOCA 11 IlN1'I 'ROB'1 i.19 IB.P W M1 M.b.J - 9.91e b. ♦ AMENITIES pTE LOCATION. MFBFIM 110.1LL 'V'I 9.51 11.6 n poe qV PME IINL!'L'1 •.91 Y.6 ee PqulM•' I<u.Ll BW.'eev oelMV�,Ie OB�bna♦ aw a m. LOMB WAY 30 AC WIM mwu♦i' a i Na 'L x1W'ii Pllpb• 23i 26h21M10 FFA MASTM PLAN II�w®MM76 anneamNee`1a1�z F,QWR C Page 5 of I 1 KV0132013=WPIPOSTCCP 's Way 30 Acre RPDD(PUDZ-PL2013X](XS27)btl801411ocx (Af 0 a a 4Y M RAl 4 , 4 vARES VAARIEES' � � 4' I_ it PAIS I CUEyi If Irl 17 t 1C it,5 1CUE W P.U.E I II 1' y' SOD WWI � .coma �,y1� I e� ,�1111Hwnwr 1'y�j .. 1 :. 2! WL ZV MIN. 5' WIN, wu O TYPICAL ROAD NOTES : 1) ALL UNPAVED AREAS WRHIN ROW ARE SECTION TO BE SEEDED AND MULCHED (OR SODDED AS NOTED). 2) t DENOTES 4' C.U.E. NOT REQUIRED If R.O.W. IS AT LEAST 50' WIDE QIP4r014 00/25/1013 ALJ. IDI! 15015mmy NSIR.2%= I LOADS WAY SD A.O.W. SECTION NNW 5pp-p0W mss $N130111 uJ: a m n ,®, „,Iz PAX 01 IDI! %ib Cs Wd NA,,,1 EXHIBIT Cal 2011023 „o DWT C-1 �.w �� LANE LANE 001111101. EEEV. 10 SETBACK m ERNE FPROPERTY UNE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ro PRESERVE I I • I . I ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OeB Poo' � - I 25 SETBA(OK I PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE I TO PRESFRYE p� /� G f1�IM B' MIN. FOR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED, I R' MN 0' CK I' FOR SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED, TOMNIWSE. TWO—FAMILY 09/23/2013 ANO SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT UNE I NOT TO SCALE I' MN. SIDE YARD SETBACK MUST BE I =FIOLE MONTEB .mz f1T6 E^� W., M.ges ElyWay vuo,. (236) M rw�m c.uM.0 ar wa�..e„�o.�,;= ACCOMPAMED BY ANOMER I' MIN. N;Nx' ;m, SETBACK ON ADJOINING LOT TO T® �• a a ACHIEVE MINIMUM 12' SEPARATION. I I I I I PROPERTY UNE I I I I I 23' MIN. FOR FRONT—ENTRY GARAGE I I MAY BE REDUCED FOR SIDE ENTRY I GARAGE IF DESIGNED SO THAT A I PARKED VEHICLE %MU- NOT ENCROACH UPON THE SIDEWALK IN NO CASE SHALL THE FRONT I RO.W. IRI: SETBACK A SIDE ENTRY GARAGE BEE THAN TH10'. -- t I I I I I I I I 1 PROPERTY UNE ' MIN. Page 7 of I I H:00130013023\WMSTCCPC1Lmd's Way 30 Acm RPUDIPUDZ-PL20130000827)1-17-2016 docs ROADWAY 01/1{/101{ SIDEWALK 12/13/2013 09/23/2013 NOT TO SCALE =FIOLE MONTEB .mz f1T6 E^� W., M.ges ElyWay vuo,. (236) M rw�m c.uM.0 ar wa�..e„�o.�,;= LOWS WAY 90 Ac FFID TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT Eb'Bff C-2 N;Nx' ;m, AU AW T® �• a a eWler o -z Page 7 of I I H:00130013023\WMSTCCPC1Lmd's Way 30 Acm RPUDIPUDZ-PL20130000827)1-17-2016 docs EXIDDIT D LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel I The West'h of the East''/, of the Northeast -/, of the Southwest 'A of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Parcel 2 The East V2 of the East 1/2 of the Northeast '/. of the Southwest %4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Parcel 3 The East V. of the West V. of the Northeast %4 of the Southwest '/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Page 8 of 1 I H:@013120130231WPVOSTCCPW.arE's W, 30 Mrs RPUD(PUDZ-P1 130000 27)1-17-2014. a . d EXHIBIT E LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC PRIVATE ROADWAY WIDTH Deviation No. I seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01, Private Roadway Width, which requires a 60 -foot right-of-way width, to allow that the private roadway shall have a minimum 42 foot right-of-way width. DRAINAGE EASEMENT WIDTH 2. Deviation No. 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.01.02.B.2, Drainage Easements, which requires that an easement shall be no less than 15 feet in width to allow for an easement that is no less than 10 feet in width for storm drainage pipes less than 24" in diameter and with an invert no more than 6 feet from finished grade. All installations will follow OSHA and ACPA Standards. PERIMETER WALL/FENCE HEIGHT 3. Deviation No. 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.0 Fences and Walls and Section 4.06.02.C.3, Types of Buffers, which limit the fence or wall height to 6 feet, to allow a perimeter wall or fence and berm in combination up to thirteen (13) feet in height, (including an eight (8) foot fence or wall installed on the perimeter berm, which will be between 2 and 5 feet in height). SIDEWALKS 4. Deviation No. 4 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A.1, Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements, which requires sidewalks on both sides of the street, to allow a single eight (8) foot -wide sidewalk on only one side of a street where the street is adjacent to the preserve. AMENITY SITE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS 5. Deviation No. 5 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.2, Buffer Requirements, which requires a typical Type "B" buffer width of 15 feet, to allow such buffers on the Amenity Center/Clubhouse tract, if constructed, to be a minimum of 10 feet in width with Type "B" buffer vegetation installed. Page 9 of I 1 H'QOU13000231W POST CCPa Wry 30 A.e APUD(PUDZ-Pt2000MU7)1-Ir-2011A 0 EXHIBIT F LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS A. When the Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection at CR -951 is signalized upon meeting warrants, the cost of the signalization of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Owner and other developments located in the area (east and west of C.R.951) and at no cost to Collier County and without road impact fee credits. These improvements are site -related improvements and shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. B. If at the time of application of the first plat or first Site Development Plan (SDP) for this development, The Lord's Way along the development's frontage is not improved to County standards for a two-lane paved local road, The Lord's Way shall he constructed by the developer to the County's standards for a two-lane paved local road from the eastern terminus of the existing paved The Lord's Way to a point adjacent to the eastern property line of the development. This shall include an eastbound right -tum lane into the development. Stormwater management for this segment of road shall be accommodated in the stormwater management system of this development. This shall occur prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the first building permit within the Project. These improvements are site -related and shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. C. A 6" thick, 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk shall be installed on the south side of The Lord's Way along the frontage of the development prior to the issuance of the first CO for any residential building permit within the project. 2. UTILITY REQUIREMENTS A. The development shall be subject to application for and conditions associated with a water and sewer availability letter from Collier County Utilities Division. 3. PLANNING A. The developer, it successor or assignee, shall provide to any potential resident a disclosure statement with respect to the noise that is associated with the Swamp Buggy Races located at 8250 Collier Boulevard, Naples, Florida within the Florida Sports Park (within the Hacienda Lakes RPUD) as it relates to the location of this RPUD. The statement shall disclose that the Florida Sports Park and Swamp Buggy operations regularly generate noise which may be heard on the Lord's Way 30 Acre PUD property, both during the day and into the evening, including but not limited to, noise from swamp buggy racing, tractor pulls, festivals, and music concerts. This statement must be presented to the buyer prior to entering into any sales contract. Page 10 of 11 HR01311013013\W%POST CCPCU.anr's W., 30 Acre MD (MDZ-r30130000a27)1-17.1011 darn 0 B. Within 120 days of approval of this PUD, Owner shall record in the public records of Collier County a notice of proximity to the Florida Sports Park and Swamp Buggy grounds. This notice shall disclose that the Florida Sports Park and Swamp Buggy operations regularly generate noise which can be heard on the PUD property, both during the day and into the evening, including but not limited to, noise from swamp buggy racing, tractor pulls, festivals, and music concerts. The legal description of the PUD shall be attached to the notice. C. The eastern boundary of the RPUD shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements for a Type C buffer. D. All residential buildings shall be constructed in a manner to provide an exterior ambient sound level reduction of SLR 35 decibels, consistent with the provisions of LDC Subsection 4.02.06.N.6.g. 4. PUD MONITORING A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until closeout of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Lord's Way 30, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 5. DENSITY CALCULATION AND TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) CREDITS A. A density calculation and TDR Credit tracking sheet shall be submitted with each Site Development Plan (SDP) and/or plat for the redemption of TDR Credits needed for the project. Page I 1 of I 1 H, -Wt 1t0130231WNPDST CCPCIImBS Way 30 Acre MD (MDZ-FU0130000827)1-17-20140ax 0 RICH SCOTT Governor March 17, 2014 Honorable Dwight E. Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County Post Office Boz 413044 Naples, Florida 34101-3044 Attention: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clark Dear Mr. Brock: RES DETZN&R Secretary of State Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 14-11, which was filed in this office on March 17, 2014. Sincerely, Liz Cloud Program Administrator LC/elr Enclosure R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: 1850) 245-6270 • Facsimile: (850) 488-9879 wwwAos.state.D.us Coer Corixty Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Planning Section MEMORANDUM To: Rachel Beasley, Planner, Zoning Services From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Date: Much 9, 2017 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review PETITION NUMBER: PDI -PL -2017-0444 PETITION NAME: Lord's Way 30 Acre Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Rev.I REQUEST: To amend the Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, approved via Ordinance #14-I1, to add one deviation regarding signage; modify one of the existing deviations relating to perimeter wall/berm height; and to modify the residential development regulations. LOCATION: The ±30.0 acre subject site is located on the east side of Collier Blvd. (CR 95 1) and on the south side of The Lord's Way in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict as depicted on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. This District is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential uses, including Planned Unit Developments. The Subdistrict permits a variety of residential unit types at a maximum base density of 1.5 dwelling units per gross acre (DU/A) or up to 2.5 DU/A via use of TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) credits. Therefore, the subject site is eligible for 1.5 DU/A = 45 DUs or 2.5 DU/A = 75 DUs. The RPUD (via Ordinance #14-11) was approved for a maximum of 75 dwelling units (2.5 DU/A • 30 A = 75 DUs). This petition is for Insubstantial changes to the Planned Unit Development (PDI) to clarify deviations in the RPUD for signage, perimeter heights, and to modify the residential development regulations. No changes to the PUD boundary, or in permitted uses, densities, or intensities are being requested. Relevant FLUE Objectives and policies are stated below (in italics); each policy is followed by staff analysis (in bold). FLUE Policy 5.4: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Pagel of 2 Attachment C (Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition.) FLUE Objective 7 and Relevant Policies Due to the minor changes proposed (no changes in permitted uses, densities, or intensities), and since the Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD was evaluated for consistency with the Future Land Use Element prior to the adoption of Ordinance #14-11 in March 2014, staff is of the opinion that a re-evaluation of FLUE policies under Objective 7 (pertaining to access, interconnections, walkability, etc.) is not necessary. Based upon the above analysis, the proposed PDI may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Mike Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Ray Bellows, Manager, Zoning Services Section PDI-PL2017-0444 Lord's Way Rl.docx 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Page 2 of 2 In addition, the petitioner is seeking a Deviation to provide additional buffering. Deviation number 3 seeks to permit a wall greater than the allowed 6 -foot height to permit a taller wall at 8 -foot height. For further discussion of the Deviation, see the Deviation section of this Staff Report. LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below: Rezone findings are designated as RZ and PUD findings are designated as PUD. (Staffs responses to these criteria are provided in non -bold font): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the GMP. Subject to the Staff Recommendation, the Comprehensive Planning Section has indicated that the proposed PUD rezone is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as undeveloped agricultural lands, sports park lands, and residential rehabilitation lands. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel is of sufficient sin that it will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It is also comparable with expected land uses by virtue of its consistency with the FLUE of the GMP. As described in the Staff Report, the subject site is surrounded by the Swamp Buggy to the east; undeveloped land and an FPL substation with an Agricultural zoning designation to the south. To the west of the subject site is undeveloped land with an Agricultural zoning designation; to the north is a partially developed residential rehabilitation area with a zoning designation of First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus MPUD (Mixed-use Planned Development). 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3 above. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. PUDZ-PL20130000827, THE LORDS WAV 30 ACRE RPUD Dep abw 31, 2013 Page 9&17 Attachment D The growth and development trends, changing market conditions, specifically the development of the site with residences, and the development of the surrounding area, support the proposed PUD. This site is located within an area of development with a mixture of uses. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change should not adversely influence living conditions in the existing neighborhood. However, the adjacent Swamp Buggy Grounds will have an impact on the proposed residential development. As previously noted in the Staff Report, the petitioner has made Developer Commitments and requested Deviations that will mitigate for the noise emanating from the Swamp Buggy Grounds. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. Evaluation of this project took into account the requirement for consistency with the applicable policies of the Traffic Element of the GMP. The proposed development was found consistent with those policies. Additional transportation commitments are contained in Exhibit "F" of the PUD document. S. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed development will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Staff is of the opinion this PUD rezone will not adversely impact property values. However, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination by law is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Property to the north is partially developed and property to the east of the subject site is already developed. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the Land Development Code is that their sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. PUDZ�t10130 827, TRE LORD'S WAY MACRE RPUD December 31, 2013 Page 10 of 17 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be developed within existing zoning. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The change suggested is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require site alteration and these residential sites will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff has concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUDLPL20130000927, THE LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD Dew ber 31, 2013 Pea. 11 d 17 PUD FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02,13.13.5 states that, `In support of its recommendation, the Planning Commission shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:" 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The petitioner will be required to comply with all county regulations regarding drainage, sewer, water and other utilities. In addition, the commitments included in the PUD exhibit adequately address the impacts from the proposed development. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to gain platting and/or site development plan approval. Both processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and policies of the GMP. County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis and the Staff Recommendation, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As previously stated in this Staff Report, the biggest impact on compatibility with the proposed development is the Swamp Buggy Grounds. The petitioner has adequately address the compatibility issues through Developer Commitments and requested Deviations that will mitigate for the noise emanating from the Swamp Buggy Grounds. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside by this project is consistent with the provisions of the Land Development Code. PUDZ-PL20130000927, THE LORD'S WAV 30 ACRE RPUD Dac be,31.2013 Page 12 of 17 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Currently, the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. In addition, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. If "ability" implies supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal system, potable water supplies, characteristics of the property relative to hazards, and capacity of roads, then the subject property has the ability to support expansion based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or m to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The petitioner is seeking 5 deviations to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06 A). This criterion requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. Staff believes that the 8 deviations proposed can be supported, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the elements may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviations are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Please refer to the Deviation Discussion below for a more extensive examination of the deviations. Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking 5 deviations from general LDC requirements and has provided justification in support of the deviations. Staff has analyzed the deviation requests and provides the analysis and recommendations below: Deviation # 1 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01. N. "Street System Requirements," which requites a minimum 60-foot right-of-way width for a local street to allow a minimum 42 foot right- of-way width. Petitioner's Rationale: The applicant states that the justification for this deviation is that this right- of-way width can be found sufficient to accommodate travel lanes, drainage facilities, and utilities. This deviation is routinely granted, particularly for small scale residential projects such as this, where traffic volumes are low and internal traffic is limited to that directly related to the project. PUDZ-P1 130000927, THE LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD December 31, 2013 Page 13 of 17 WALDROP ENGINEERING CML ENGINEERING & LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS X8100 /iDA BOFNiA8PIMA19B„R $,ii86 W2311`/Q11 MT ; 1254M7899 Memorandum To: Rachel Beasley, Nancy Gundlach From: Lindsay Robin, Alexis Crespo cc: David Torres Date: May 3, 2017 Subject: Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD (PL20174)000444) — Neighborhood Information Meeting Synopsis Waldrop Engineering, P.A., and Collier County Staff conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) on Tuesday, May 2, 2017. The meeting was held at 5:30 p.m. at the South Regional Library, Meeting Room "A" located at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, FL 34113. The sign -in sheet is attached as Exhibit "A", and demonstrates no property owners were in attendance other than the Applicant, Applicant's representatives, and County Staff. A handout was made available outlining the insubstantial change request. The handout is attached as Exhibit `B". Staff and the Applicant's representative closed the meeting at 5:45 p.m. due to lack of attendance. Page 1 of 1 Attachment E NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD PDI - PL20170000444 May 2, 2017 @ 5:30p.m. PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY """PlInst be a6IV&O" The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. a you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name Address Cily, ST Zip E -Mail Address PAY aELLINA15 rAUIA fbAbtu ws r ID E• -roa55 4S r2L LLC- • Ft . hq:d ieraeue�O rLls bt MOO randt kAS , Fti Itndy w�dC '�UtstD ��q 4t M 4p, W LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD (PDI-PL20170000444) Neighborhood Information Meeting Project Information Sheet Tuesday, May 2, 2017 Project Size: 30+/ -acres -- [NO CHANGE] Future Land Use: Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict-- [NO CHANGE] Zoning: Residential Planned Unit Development -- [NO CHANGE] Approved Density/Uses: 75 residential dwelling units -- [NO CHANGE] *Proposed Insubstantial Changes to the RPUD: • Add one (1) deviation to increase allowable signage area to 80 square feet; • Modify one (1) existing deviation relating to perimeter wall/berm height to allow a 16 -foot wall/berm combination adjacent to the Swamp Buggy attraction; • Add a deviation for reduced internal amenity parking requirements; • Modify the residential development regulations for single-family and two-family dwelling units. LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD ENGINEERING INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 NIM SYNOPSIS • 0 fA/t t 011h W90h/114h Or- 1k 11011E1k IrEr" Er1E1k It1 Memorandum To: Rachel Beasley, Nancy Gundlach From: Lindsay Robin, Alexis Crespo cc: David Torres Date: May 3, 2017 Subject: Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD (PL2017-0000444) —Neighborhood Information Meeting Synopsis Waldrop Engineering, P.A., and Collier County Staff conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) on Tuesday, May 2, 2017. The meeting was held at 5:30 p.m. at the South Regional Library, Meeting Room "A" located at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway, Naples, FL 34113. The sign -in sheet is attached as Exhibit "A", and demonstrates no property owners were in attendance other than the Applicant, Applicant's representatives, and County Staff. A handout was made available outlining the insubstantial change request. The handout is attached as Exhibit `B". Staff and the Applicant's representative closed the meeting at 5:45 p.m. due to lack of attendance. Page 1 of 1 0 • • EXHIBIT "A" NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD PDI — PL20170000444 May 2, 2017 @ 5:30p.m. PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***Tease be rldvtsed*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. Name Address City, ST Zip E -Mail Address IR16-Y (3Ca / r' a zt wj 12.7 �-Y ZS 0 0 0 L wl EXHIBIT "B" LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD (PDI-PL20170000444) Neighborhood Information Meeting Project Information Sheet Tuesday, May 2, 2017 Project Size: 30+/ -acres --[NO CHANGE] Future Land Use: Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict -- [NO CHANGE] Zoning: Residential Planned Unit Development -- [NO CHANGE] Approved Density/Uses: 75 residential dwelling units -- [NO CHANGE] *Proposed Insubstantial Changes to the RPUD: • Add one (1) deviation to increase allowable signage area to 80 square feet; • Modify one (1) existing deviation relating to perimeter wall/berm height to allow a 16 -foot wall/berm combination adjacent to the Swamp Buggy attraction; 0 • Add a deviation for reduced internal amenity parking requirements; • Modify the residential development regulations for single-family and two-family dwelling units. 0 fi W, va, I 111 1 T 70, LORD'S WAY 30-ACRE RPUD J'A ENGINEERING INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 SIGN POST AFFIDAVIT • SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED Alexis Crespo WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PL 170000444 Y07-0 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. #305 SI ATURE F APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Alexis Crespo Bonita Springs, FL 34135 NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF-E9bblER L i�•4 The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this day of -TOO-j , 20 Iz , by F -LE S (XV -SP -0 , personally known to me or,who-prods-Ced— as identification and who did/did not take an oath. My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 < �, L, Signature o Notary Public Printed Name of Notary Public • • • ,."F;Y'Pu .., KIMBERLY BAILEY r+�% NotaryPubllc - State of Florida Commission 9 GG 074407 " • or= My Comm. Exphs May 7, 2021 °FF`°�:'• Bonded through National Notary Assn. My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 < �, L, Signature o Notary Public Printed Name of Notary Public • • • • 0 flval I ill :� E 1 ENGINEERING LORD*'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 PDI APPLICATION • 9 0 0 c(Ser County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD (PDI) LDC subsection 10.02.13 E & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Ch. 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application. PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Lords Way 30 LLC Address: 7742 Alico Rd. City. Ft. Myers Telephone: n/a Cell: (904) 762-4454 E -Mail Address: dtorres@COastaIconcretepod.COm Name of Agent: Lindsay F. Robin State: FL Fax: n/a ZIP: 33192 Folio #: 00418360002, 00418320000, 00416960006 Section: 14 Twp: 50 Range: 26E Firm: Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Address: 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. #305 City: Bonita Springs State: FL ZIP: 34135 Telephone: (239) 908-3079 Cell: (561) 704-7633 Fax: (239) 405-7899 E -Mail Address: lindsay.robin@waldropengineering.com 6/17/2015 Page 1 of 5 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? Q Yes ❑ No ❑ 1. If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name the beneficiaries below. ❑ 2. If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders below. ❑ 3. If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate and name principals below. x❑ 4. If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, if any. ❑ 5. If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. ❑ 6. If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address below: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.I. PROPERTYf. s PUD NAME: The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD ORDINANCE NUMBER: 14-11 FOLIO NUMBER(S): 00418360002; 00418320000; 00416960006 Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? 0 Yes ❑ No 0 6/17/2015 Page 2 of 5 • C7 • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Co V County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If no, please explain: Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes Q No If yes, in whose name? Has any portion of the PUD been ❑ SOLD and/or ❑ DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? ❑ Yes No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. 6/17/2015 Page 3 of 5 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW 4 OF COPIES REQUIRED RE NOT RED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 16 1 © f Pre -Application Meeting notes 1 f Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary 16 Q/ ❑ Detail of request ❑ ' ❑ Current Master Plan '& 1 Reduced Copy ❑I El Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy ❑ Revised Text and any exhibits ❑ ❑ PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined El_ 5J/ ❑ PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # ❑ �❑ Warranty Deed ❑ Ul`'F ❑ Legal Description ❑ ❑ Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended ❑ ❑ If PUD is platted, include plat book pages ❑ ❑ I ET List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 1 El Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 2 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 LK, - 1 �' ❑ ❑ Copy of 8 % in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. �-,/ ❑ I� ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/17/2015 Page 4 of 5 • • 0 Cot ' ev County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ I Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director [!' Utilities Engineering: Kris 1Laan 1=i21G F-� Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad [11T i Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ I Naples Airport Authority: Ted Soliday ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan ! Other: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director other: FEE REQUIREMENTS VPUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00 [Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 _/ ZS M Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.80 The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL. 34104 (' 44 It Applica Ow gnature Date (osrei a• c 5 �� Applicant/Owner Name (please print) fir - 6/17/2015 Page 5 of 5 LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD ENGINEERING INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 PRE -APPLICATION WAIVER EMAIL FROM RAY BELLOWS • • Lindsay Robin From: BellowsRay <RayBellows@colliergov.net> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 3:37 PM To: Alexis Crespo; BrethauerPaula Cc: Lindsay Robin Subject: RE: Pre -Application Meeting Waiver Request - Lord's Way 30 PDI Hi Alexis, I don't have a problem with waiving the pre -app meeting in this case. However, I do recommend that you do a telephone pre -app with the assigned planner so he/she will have a chance to review the proposed changes before it is submitted. It has been my experience that those submitted applications without a pre -app have had processing delays (partly due to a lack of pre -app notes) that is avoided with a telephone pre -app. The planner would e-mail pre -app notes that you can include with the submittal. Please let Paula know if you are going to submit with or without the telephone pre -app. Ray Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Division - Growth Management Department Telephone: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Coe -r County From: Alexis Crespo [mailto:Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 12:17 PM To: BellowsRay Cc: Lindsay Robin Subject: Pre -Application Meeting Waiver Request - Lord's Way 30 PDI Hi Ray, We have been asked to file a PDI to allow for the following changes to the above reference RPUD. I've attached the ordinance for your reference. We've done very similar amendments via PDI for Hacienda Lakes and a few other PUDs recently, and were hoping to waive the pre -application meeting. Can you review and let us know if we need to meet in advance of submittal? • Amend side yard setback from 6' to 5' • Allow for reduced front yard setback for side loaded garages and secondary front yards on corner lots, and correct standard front yard setback to 20'/23' from back of curb • Allow for 16' tall perimeter wall/berm combination to align with wall/berm heights for adjacent projects • Potential entry signage deviation Thanks very much for your consideration. Let us know if you have any questions. •Alexis V. Crespo, AICP, LEED AP Vice President of Planning 1 ENGINEERING ra ChIMNURING r„MiMMi L.%BS( e0*MCHirrcn:Ar Direct: E: alexisc@waldropengineering.com ) C: (239) 850-8525 Office: P: (239) 405-7777 1 F: (239) 405-7899 www.waldropengineering.com NOTICE: Upon receipt of any electronic file/data from Waldrop Engineering, P.A., you are agreeing to the following: This file/data is for informational purposes only. it is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this electronic file/data with the actual project site conditions. Recipient agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Waldrop Engineering, P.A. for any defects or errors in this file/data. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. • 0 I)INI` LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD ENGINEERING INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 TELEPHONE PRE - APPLICATION MEETING NOTES :7 0 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES FREQUIRFyD / REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 16 ❑ f Pre -Application Meeting notes 1 ❑ , 0 Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary 16 [' ❑ Detail of request ' ❑ Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy ❑ [] Revised Text and any exhibits ❑ / ❑ PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined ❑ [/ ❑ PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # ❑ ❑ Warranty Deed ❑ ❑Y./ ❑ Legal Description ❑ ©f ❑ Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended ❑ [] If PUD is platted, include plat book pages ❑ ❑ , ❑ List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 i Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 2 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ®r; ❑ Copy of 8 %2 in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site 1 Q' ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ❑ R' *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/17/2015 Page 4 of 5 • • • Co ey County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Utilities Engineering: KcLs iafk16 n F*IG F Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad [� Emergency Management: Dan Summers Naples Airport Authority: Ted Soliday ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Rvan ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS 1Ia' PUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00 (-/Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 ZS C4' Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $9V --r% - The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Applicant/Owner Signature Applicant/Owner Name (please print) Date 6/17/2015 Page 5 of 5 LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD ENG INEER INO INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 COVER LETTER/PROJECT NARRATIVE • • • 3 L_ 112AL-A July 5, 2017 UIs0M = r��a,%, mr-th, or- Ek 1/10IL IOr— rEM. a06 1Ar% Ms. Rachel Beasley Zoning & Land Development Review Department Community Development & Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Lord's Way 30 Acre (RPUD) Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development (PDI) REVISED JULY 2017 Dear Ms. Beasley: Enclosed for your review is an application for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD in regards to the Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD (Residential Planned Unit Development), a 30+/- acre project generally located generally located south of Lord's Way, approximately X mile east of CR 951, in unincorporated Collier County. The . Applicant is requesting to modify one (1) existing deviation relating to perimeter wall/berm height; add one (1) deviation related to reduced amenity parking; and to modify the residential development regulations. C7 BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS The Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD was originally rezoned from Agricultural to Residential Planned Unit Development in 2014 per Ordinance No. 14-11. The RPUD allows for up to 75 residential dwelling units and a clubhouse/amenity. These uses have not been developed to date, and the site is vacant and partially cleared. REQUEST The Applicant is requesting Staff's approval of an insubstantial change to the Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD to allow for the following modifications to Exhibit B, Development Standards; Exhibit C-2, Typical Lot Layout; and Exhibit E, List of Requested Deviations from LDC, approved per Ordinance No. 14-11: • Modify Exhibit B, Development Standards Table, for single-family, single-family attached and two- family/single-family zero lot line dwelling types to reduce the side yard setback from 6' to 5'; reduce the front yard setback from 23' to 20' for lots with front -loaded garages; and reduce the minimum distance between structures from 12' to 10' to align with the proposed 5' side yard setbacks; Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD PDI-PL20170000126 Cover Letter/Request Narrative Page 1 of 6 Modify Exhibit C-2, Typical Lot Layout to reflect the modifications to the Exhibit B, Development • Standards Table; Modify Exhibit E, List of Requested Deviations from LDC, Deviation No. 3, to allow a 16' tall perimeter wall/fence/berm combination along the eastern perimeter of the project boundary; add Deviation No. 6 to allow for reduced amenity parking. The modified deviation, additional deviation, and development standards will allow for the development of the Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD in a manner that is consistent with the surrounding communities, and many other PUDs in Collier County. This request will not negatively impact the safety of the future residents living within the Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, as lots have been constructed to these standards throughout the County. The proposed modifications to the development standards will apply only to single-family, single-family attached and two-family/single-family zero lot line dwelling types, and are not proposed for townhomes, multi -family buildings, the clubhouse or future amenity site. The proposed development standards will also allow for residential lots to maximize the developable area, thereby allowing for larger lanais, outdoor living spaces, and/or expanded building footprints. This request reflects market demand for smaller private yards, with clustered common open space areas outside of the lots, which are maintained by the future homeowners association. This reflects the buyer's preference for low maintenance single-family homes in master -planned, deed restricted communities. The residential streets are planned as private right-of-ways that are 42 feet in width with relatively low • travel speeds. The smaller right-of-way width provides a proven traffic calming effect, resulting in overall lowering of travel speeds within the community, and thereby mitigating the necessity for larger front yard setbacks, particularly for corner lots with double frontages. The approved deviation that the Applicant is seeking to modify allows for a maximum wall/fence/berm combination height of up to thirteen (13) feet, which the Applicant would like to remain in the PUD. The Applicant is seeking a nominal increase to allow a combination wall/berm up to sixteen (16) feet in height to apply only to the eastern portion of the project boundary where the project abuts the Swamp Buggy attraction. The proposed deviation will further enhance the compatibility between the proposed community and neighboring lands, and will assist in screening adjacent developments, as intended by the LDC. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI, which abuts the Property to the east, has an approved deviation to allow for a 20 -foot wall/fence/berm combination adjacent to the Swamp Buggy attraction. The Applicant is similarly seeking the ability to construct a 16' tall wall/fence/berm along the property line adjacent to the attraction, due to the proximity to this intensive recreational use. The Swamp Buggy attraction warrants further screening from the adjacent residential land uses due to the noise, light, and activity that takes place on that site. Therefore, the Applicant's request will be compatible and consistent with the neighboring PUD, and enhance the community. Please also refer to the enclosed Deviation Justification Narrative that further details the appropriateness of the requested modification to Deviation 3 and the addition of Deviation 6. • Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD PDI-PL20170000126 Cover Letter/Request Narrative Page 2 of 5 0 JUSTIFICATION/COMPLIANCE WITH LDC §10.02.13.E: • The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 10.02.13.E as follows: a. A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; No, the request will not impact the existing PUD boundary. b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; No, the request will not increase the approved density or intensity, or the height of proposed buildings. c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No, the request will not result in a decrease of preserve, conservation, recreation, or open space areas. d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No, the requests do not impact the size of non-residential areas or proposed to relocate such areas within the PUD boundary. e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; No, the request will not result in an impact to the development in terms of traffic and public facilities. f. A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; No, the request will not generate a higher level of vehicular traffic. No change in land use activities is being requested. Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD PDI-PL20170000126 Cover Letter/Request Narrative Page 3of5 g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; No, the request will not result in increased requirements for stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharges. h. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; No, the request will not modify any existing uses that would impact any surrounding land uses or that would be incompatible. i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; No, the request does not impact the project's compliance with the Growth Management Plan. The request is limited to modifying single-family, single-family attached and two family/single family zero lot line setbacks, modifying one (1) deviation to allow for additional fence/wall/berm height to screen the different surrounding land uses, and adding a deviation for reduced amenity parking. The request fully meets the intent of the LDC. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13; or No, the request does not require a determination that the change will result in a substantial deviation. As noted above, the request will not increase density/intensity, traffic generation, non-residential land uses, or decrease environmental areas. The request does not meet any of the criterion outlined in F.S. 380.06(19)(e)2. k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13 No, the request is not a substantial modification to the PUD, and may be processed as a PDI pursuant to the LDC and Administrative Code. • Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD PDI-PL20170000126 Cover Letter/Request Narrative Page 4 of 5 0 CONCLUSION: In summary, the proposed Insubstantial Change will allow modifications to the development standards of the Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD to support the Applicant's residential development program. The proposed modifications will allow for enhanced design Flexibility, and will not negatively impact public health, safety or welfare. This request is similar to requests approved for other planned communities, and will further enhance the compatibility of the community with the surrounding development pattern. The RPUD will remain consistent with the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP). The following items are enclosed for your review: 1. A check in the amount of $3,125 for the application fees; 2. One (1) copy of the completed PDI Application; 3. One (1) copy of the Pre -Application Waiver E-mail from Ray Bellows; 4. One (1) copy of the telephone pre -app notes; S. One (1) copy of the Cover Letter/Project Narrative detailing the purpose of the request, 6. One (1) copy of the Current Master Plan & 1 reduced copy (8 X" x 11"); 7. One (1) copy of the Revised Exhibit B, Development Standards; Exhibit C-2, Typical Lot Layout; and Exhibit E, List of Requested Deviations from LDC; 8. One (1) copy of the Recorded Warranty Deed; • 9. One (1) copy of the Deviations and Justifications Narrative; 10. One (1) copy of the Legal Description; 11. One (1) copy of the Affidavit of Authorization; 12. One (1) copy of the list identifying Owner; 13. One (1) copy of the approved Addressing Checklist; 14. One (1) copy of amended Title Page with Ordinance #; and 15. One (1) copy of the Location Map (8.5"X11"). Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (239) 405-7777 or lindsav.robin@waldrooeneineerine.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING, P.A. Y Lindsay F. Robin, MPA Project Planner Enclosures • cc: David Torres, Lords Way 30, LLC Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD PDI-PL20170000126 Cover Letter/Request Narrative Page 5 of 5 0LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD IENGINEERING INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 CURRENT RPUD MASTER PLAN • • 0 • r, LA n u 20NED: MPUO 30' R.O.W. RESERVATION BY ADJACENT PROPERTY -1 EXISTING OWNER FOR FUTURE ROADWAY EXPANSION GRAVEL ROAD THE LORD'S WAY--- ''l COUNTY _ r—__-- Z20' TYPE 'D' I 1 URUTY 'i— y6 EASEMENT I--10' TYPE 'A' 0 PERIMETER PERIMETER BUFFER I I z o I BUFFER F z I I 20' TYPE 'C' PERIMETER BUFFER �'a I TRACT 'R' I , �o I Residential 1 EXISTING GRAVEL 8 o I ROAD 8p I I I' not I �� 1111 a a I � m IIII x o I v TRACT III I N N I a °1 .LD I I xx I z Lake 1 III Z ; III 1 �� II N Awm LL�rc I 111110 200 mQ �> I TRACT R I ':SCALE -z8 I q Residential q 11 0 I II 02/ZS/2013 Fg12/13/2013 ooz— ♦ �, •, 1 12/17/2013 1 01/14/2014 & TREICT`Pe`,` preserve 11 >w ♦ ♦ +1 I _.. ZONED: A MAXIMUM PERMITTED DENSITY= ®DENOTES LOCATIONS OF PUD 75UNITSDEVIATIONS 1. 3 AND 4. NATIVE VEGETATION 8 OPEN SPACE DENA7mN 2 WILL DCGIR LAND USE SUMMARY m.wu ueue. Vee.+a+e.D . +D.Pz. x.. 74RG16NOUT PUD AND NOR,a �[.a isv .+ P•a+(.0 Mu::D v.w+•+(DD DEMA71ON 5 MAY DCOIIR IN d:tvi6(P+iA:TPfii2i I ie.ST 7i. m.sa. 4.zs - z. ra. AD[. Mgvirai u.uVe A 70 IN: DETERMINED xonxxr IaMCr ImAxesf ePmMe MPICP..'LL[G'(r1 '.nI'vPv'r a.O..ama<l r1e60. aO+Y Opy 8 aw[e 0 P0[D-vitlteetl.Mr 1.[ryrcvlD ...J AMENITIES SITE LOCATION. "T" T I.IA1 LORD'S WAY 30 AID R 3W Na u� R x110 w.wn: (uc mz, INwm: 2 A 1 zs4-2aoo RPIA MASTER PLAN ,c11 >ora�Flo MiAli 9R1� AwN>1+rasro�`,"N�°o.ii7i EXHBrr C I c Page 5 of 11 H:VA1312013MAW�TCCMLoN's Way 30 Acre RPUO IPUDZ-PL20130000627) I-17-2014Amx 0 LA ryENGINEERING LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT • DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 REVISED PUD DOCUMENT WITH EXHIBIT B, (DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS), EXHIBIT C-2 (TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT) AND EXHIBIT E (LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS) • 0 ................. • EXIIIBIT B LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD • Exhibit B Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD Residential Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the Land Development Code in effect as of the date of approval of the Site Development Plan or Subdivision plat. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE PERIMETER PUD SETBACK The perimeter PUD setback shall be, ata minimum, equal to the required width of perimeter landscape buffers. PLATTED RESIDENTM OR AMENITY CENTER LOTS.. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE- FAMILY SINGLE- FAMILY ATTACHED TWO-FAMILY& SINGLE-FAMILY 2'no LOT LINE TOWN'HOMEor MULTI- FAMILY CLUBHOUS& RECREATION BUILDINGS PRINCEPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 4, BOOS F. PER UNIT 1,800 S.F. PER UNIT 4,OW S.F. PER UNIT 10,000 S F. PER BLDG. N/A MINIMUM IAT WmTH 40 FEET 30 FEET 40 FEET N/A N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,200 S.F. 1,200 S.F. PER UNG' 1,200 S F. PER UNIT 1,000 S.F. PER UNIT N/A MINIrfUMFRONTYARD 203FERT' 2W3 FEET 3FEET 23FEVF N/A MWINUMSIDEYARD 56=1 00R FEET' 0 O FEEL' 0 O 15 FEET 20FEEV MD2IMUM REARYARD 10FEET IOFEET 10FEET 10FEET 15FEEV MIII FUM PRESERVE SMACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MINIIUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 1014 FEET R128 FEET 1QQ FEET 20 FEET 12 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT -TONED 35 FEET NTE 'STORIES 35FEETNTE2 STORIES 35FEE77NTE 2STORIES 50 FEET NTE4 STORIES 35FEEf NTE2STORIPS MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT -ACTUAL 42 FEET 42FEET 42 FEET 57 FEET 42 FEET ACCESSORYSTRUCTURES FRONT SPS SPS SPS 23 FEET SPS SmE SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS REAR' 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET PRESERYESETBACK IOFEET IOFEET 10 FEET 10FEET IOFEEf MAXIMUM HEIGHT TONED & ACTUAL S.P.S. S.P.S. S.P.S. SYS. S.P.S. NTE-- Not he Exceed; S. P. S: Same as Principal Structures; BLDG, Building; S.F. Square Feet; N/A=Not Applicable General: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth in Exhibit below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines or between structures. Condominium and/ or homeowners' association boundaries shall rut be utilized for determining development standards. Footnotes: Lots fronting on two streets shall provide a full front yard setback along the street with the shorter frontage, and a minimum 10' front yard setback along the other street frontage. Front entry garages shall be at least 20 feet from the lot line and at least 23 feet from back of sidewalk. Where side entry garages are provided, the driveway shall be designed in such a manner so that a parked vehicle shall not conflict with the sidewalk, honsver, in no case shall the front setback be less than 10'. At time of planing, intersections subject to the seconder, [ Yard veduRk shall draccourrecte compliance with sight distance triangles as set forth in LEE Section 256 minimum side setbacks for single- family attached, two-family and single- family zero lot line must be accompanied by another 56' minimum side setback on adjoining lot in achieve minimum 1QIT separation. 'Should an" Amenity Ceuter/Clubhouse" be constructed, it may be partially constructed up to lake edge and a deck area may extend into (over) the lake, in accordance with the permit requirements or limitations of the South Florida Water Management District. Should the Amenity Center/Clubhouse be constructed up in lake edge, or contain a deck area extending (over) the lake, the normally required buffer area and landscape plantings shall redistributed to the other buffers on the Amenity Center/Clubhouse site. Refer to Deviation No. 5. . 4Rear yards adjacent to the Lake Maintenance Easement (or tract) or adjacent to a perimeter landscape buffer shall not be subject to the reer yard accessory structure setback. Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD Words snuelE #weugh are deleted; Last Revised: June 22, 2017 Words underlined are added PROPERTY LINE LAKE CONTROL --- ELEV. ELEV. 20' LAKE M.E. —� ACCESSORY STRUCTURE y (E.G. POOL) 25' SETBACK PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE STRUCTURE TO PRESERVE 5' MIN. FOR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED, 0' OR U FOR SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED, TOWNHOUSE, TWO-FAMILY 5' MIN— AND SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE. 5' MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ANOTHER 5' MIN. SETBACK ON ADJOINING LOT TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM 10' SEPARATION. PROPERTY 20' MIN. FROM LOT LINE/23' FROM BACK LINE OF SIDEWALK FOR FRONT -ENTRY GARAGE MAY BE REDUCED FOR SIDE ENTRY GARAGE IF DESIGNED SO THAT A PARKED VEHICLE WILL NOT ENCROACH UPON THE SIDEWALK. IN NO CASE SHALL THE FRONT SETBACK OF A SIDE ENTRY GARAGE BE LESS THAN 10'. 0 N I LORD'S WAY 30 Ac RPUD TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT M PREPARED FOR: N (D LORD'S WAY 30, LLC 'o _d m t I w SIDEWALK ROADWAY SIDEWALK NOT TO SCALE EXHIBIT C-2 10'SETBACK ACCESORY STRUCTURE TO PRESERVE PROPERTY LINE 5' MIN. I i TREE 10' PUE AF IMENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 25100 BONITA GRANDE DRIVE -SURE 305 FILENAME: 65301 E0201.d BGNRA GS, FL 36135 � P: 23&AOS7777777 F: 239405-7899 SHEET: 1 OF 1 EMAIL• Inloewddropangineering.wm • tttkiRkRRRRRi#iii EXHIBIT E LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD • 11 LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC w+w+++t+++w+ww+++ PERIMETER WALL/FENCE HEIGHT Deviation No. 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.03.02.0 Fences and Walls and Section 4.06.02.C.3, Types of Buffers, which limit the fence or wall height to 6 feet, to allow a perimeter wall or fence and berm in combination up to thirteen (13) feet in height, and where adjacent to the Swamp Buggy on the eastern mooerty line, allow a Derimeter wall or fence and berm in combination no to sixteen (16) feet in height ,..._.__...e _.. _.p... ,,.� .__.._..__ _... _. ......_..__ .... ..._ r_....._._. __...., ....._...... AMENITY PARKING 6. feet of the recreation facilities. Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD Last Revised: June 22, 2017 Words StM& thFeugh are deleted; Words underlined are added LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD It ENGINEERING INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 RECORDED WARRANTY DEED 0 C INSTR 5284800 OR 5289 PG 2170 RECORDED 7/1/2016 9:53 AN PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc8.70 $6,300.00 REC 518.50 CONS $900,000.00 • This Instrument Prepared By: Harold J. Webre, Esquire COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH @ KOESTER, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail N., Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 (239)435-3535 Consideration: $90,000.00 WARRANTY DEED Oday This Warranty Deed is made this of June, 2016, between MARCO ISLAND GROUP, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantor7, and LORD'S WAY 30, LLC, a Florida limited liability company ("Grantee"), whose address is 7742 Alice Road, Ft. Myers, FL 33192. ti 1 cov The Grantor, in conside a sum of TEN /100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consi m ns aid Grantor in h pa by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowl g n ed an so to the said Grantee and Gramm's successors and as ign a r' p perty, situated, lying and • being in Collier County, Flo i o rt. The West 112 of th s o ast Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, Townshi Both, Range 26 Ea o 'e ty, Florida. AND OF The East 12 of the East I of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Ran st, Collier County, Florida. AND The East 12 of the West 12 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Subject to: (a) ad valorem and non ad valorem teal property taxes for 2016 and subsequent years; (b) zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governments] authority; (c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; and (d) covenants, conditions, reservations, easements and restrictions of record. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. . And the Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that the Grantor is lawfully Seized of said land in fee simple; that the Grantor has right and lawful authority to sell and convey good W.q D Page No.I of3 *** OR 5289 PG 2171 *** said land; and that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed and delivered this Warranty Deed the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: D/�'q Witne gnature 1wv, � � • +vire S . ness Printed Name �� . Cf Marco Island Group, LLC, a Florida limited liability company By: George P. Mier, its Manager Q)[Pp-�RPny Seal] — Signature F -r Witness - Printe me STATE OF 0 COUNTY OF The foregoininstrument was acknowledged before me on this L'day of June, 2016, by George P. B u Manager of Marco Isl Group LLC, a Florida limited liability company, who is personally knoo tom or _ who has produced as identificati . I Print (SEAL) ,►►v Notary PublleState of Floriae Maritza Agular j� My Commission FF 075151 Expires 12100/2017 111 L/ I►. IN WIR Warranty Deed Page No. 2 of 2 • 0 .VIENGINEERING • rl LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 REQUESTED DEVIATIONS & JUSTIFICATIONS Al 1•A/M 0 11 Mr1 A\!1 rML It'1i1 I r r 11M1k It1 DEVIATION JUSTFICATION NARRATIVE LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD REVISED JULY 2017 Deviation No. 3: Deviation No. 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.0 Fences and Walls and Section 4.06.02.C.3, Types of Buffers, which limit the fence or wall height to 6 feet, to allow a perimeter wall or fence and berm in combination up to thirteen (13) feet in height, and where adiacent to the Swamp Buggy on the eastern property line, allow a perimeter wall or fence and berm in combination up to sixteen (16) feet in height., inel Lid i ng an eight (8) feet fence eF wall installed en the peFimeteF heFffi, Whi6h Will be between 2 and 5 feet in height) Justification: The requested modification to this deviation will allow the Applicant to provide a wall, fence, berm, or fence/wall/berm combination to screen the residential project along the perimeter of the eastern project boundary that is adjacent to the Swamp Buggy attraction. This deviation will enhance the project's compatibility with the adjacent use, while still allowing the flexibility that has been previously approved. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI, which directly abuts the project to the east, has had similar enhancements approved. The proposed 16 -foot fence/wall/berm combination will mitigate potential visual and noise impacts from the neighboring tracts within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI to the east. Directly to the east of the subject property is Tract A within the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI, which is the Swamp Buggy attraction tract. This is an intensive recreational use that generates noise involving motorized vehicles during frequent events throughout the year. The proposed increase in wall/berm height will allow for additional visual screening between the proposed uses, while ensuring a quality design aesthetic via screening of the wall by required perimeter plantings. Deviation No. 6: Deviation 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04.G regarding single-family dwellings, which allows parking spaces for recreation facilities to be computed at 25 percent of the normal requirements where a majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities, to allow the parking spaces for the recreation facilities to be computed at 25 percent of the normal requirements for the entire development. Justification: The amenity center and recreational facilities are not within 300' of the majority of residential units, but more than half of the residential units are within a 500' distance of the amenity. With majority of the units within 500' of the recreational facilities, or 1/10th of a mile, which is generally accepted as "within walking distance". Additionally, due to the relatively small size of the site, clustered development footprint, and internal sidewalk system, the development has been designed to encourage pedestrian access to the proposed recreational area. Furthermore, the project is a single-family residential community where homes may have their own pools reducing the need for residents to drive to the pool and amenity center. Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD PDI-PL20170000126 Deviation Narrative Page 1 of 1 • • 1AIENGINEERING • • LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 LEGAL DESCRIPTION %.onier Lounty rroperty Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00418360002 Site Adr. Name / Address LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD City FT MYERS State FL Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range 5614 000100 047 51314 14 50 26 Legal 14 50 26 E1/2 OF W1/2 OF NEI/4 OF SW1/4 10.00 AC Millaae Area 0 39 Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER Use Code 01 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 06/30/16 5289-2170 $ 900,000 06/28/16 5289-216 $ 0 12/27/05 3954-1352 $ 0 11/25/02 3160-1204 $ 0 06/17/020531-205 $ 1,842,800 01/24/02 2968-2799 $ 220,000 12/29/00 2759-2996 $ 175,000 02/16/950� 31-390 $ 0 02/16/95 031-389 $ 0 05/01/89 1439-2004 $120,000 08/01/84 1098-159 $ 75,000 Page 1 of 1 Zip 33192 Acres *Estimated 10 Milla_ge Rates 41 *Calculations School Other Total 5.245 6.258 11.503 2016 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) • Land Value $500,000 * 500,000* (+) Improved Value $ 0 (=) Market Value $ 500,000 (-) 10% Cap $ 233,800 (_) Assessed Value $ 266,200 (_) School Taxable Value $ 500,000 (=) Taxable Value $ 266,200 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll • http://www.collierappraiser.com/inain searchlRecorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00418360002 1/18/2017 txower county Property wpprallser Pagel of I Property Summary Parcel No. 00418320000 Site Adr. 3790 THE LORDS WAY, NAPLES, FL 34114 Name / Address LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD F_IL http://w .collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum-00418320000 1/18/2017 City FT MYERS State FL Zip 33192 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated SB14 000100 046 51314 14 50 26 10 Legal 14 50 26 W 1/2 OF El/2 OF NEl/4 OF SW 1/4 10.00 AC Miilaae Area O 39 Ml lage Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 -ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Ca e O 99 -ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.245 6.258 11.503 Latest Sales History 2016 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) • Date Book -Page Amount Land Value $ 500,000 06/30/16 5289-2170 $ 900,000 (+) Improved Value $ 0 06/28/16 5289-2166 $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 500,000 10/24/11 4730-1760 $ 0 07/14/11 4703-1137 $ 350,000 1-) 10% Cap $ 233,800 03/03/11 4674-2219 $ 716,300 (_) Assessed Value $ 266,200 03/03/11 4674-2218 $ 0 (_) School Taxable Value $ 500,000 01/21/11 4674-2216 $ 0 (_) Taxable Value $ 266,200 01/20/11 4674-2217 $0 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 03/01/05 3742-2529 $ 750,000 06/17/99 2559-3475 $ 0 08/10/98 2449-2379 $ 150,000 12/27/95 2132-127 $ 105,000 02/16/95 2031-388 $0 F_IL http://w .collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum-00418320000 1/18/2017 comer county rroperzy Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00416960006 Site Adr. 3740 THE LORDS WAY, NAPLES, FL 34114 Name / Address LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD City FT MYERS Map No. Strap No. 51314 000100 009 5B14 State FL Section Township Range 14 50 26 Legal 14 5026 E1/2 OF E1/2 OF NEI/4 OF SWI/4, OR 1515 PG 899 Millage Area 0 39 Sub./Condo 100 -ACREAGE HEADER Use Code 0 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 06/30/16 5289-2170 $ 900,000 06/28/16 5289-2166 $ 0 10/24/11 4730-1760 $ 0 07/14/11 4703-1137 $ 350,000 03/03/11 4674-2224 $ 713,000 03/03/11 4674-2223 $ 0 01/21/11 4674-2221 $ 0 01/20/11 4674-2222 $ 0 03/01/05 3742-1829 $ 750,000 12/13/00 2754-304 $ 40,000 03/26/90 1515-899 $ 80,000 04/01/89 1433-855 $ 0 10/01/88 1387-290 $ 0 08/01/85 1148-412 $ 75,000 Zip 33192 Page 1 of 1 Acres *Estimated 10 Millage Rates..O *Calculations School Other Total 5.245 6.258 11.503 2016 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) • Land Value $ 500,000 9 {+) Improved Value $ 0 {=) Market Value $ 500,000 (-) 10% Cap $ 233,800 {_) Assessed Value $ 266,200 {=) School Taxable Value $ 500,000 {_) Taxable Value $ 266,200 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 0 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main searchlRecorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00416960006 1/18/2017 JmENGINEERING • LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20170000126 1 David Torres (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of Lord's Way 30. LLC (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant=contract purchasermand that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Waldrop Engineering, P.A. to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. "Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the `general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's narne and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I,, have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated 2t-1 Signature / ., Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on (date) by (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. STAMP/SEAL Signature of Notary Public • CK08-con-00115M5s REV 3/24/14 0 L' , ENGINEERING • LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 LIST IDENTIFYING OWNER WITH EQUITABLE INTEREST E-MAIL Detail by Entity Name Florida Department of Stale Page 1 of 2 DIVISION or CORPORATIONS • Department of State / Division of Corporations / Search Records / Detail By Document Number I Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company LORD'S WAY 30, LLC Filing Information Document Number L12000036101 FEIIEIN Number 45-5298978 Date Filed 03/14/2012 Effective Date 03/14/2012 state FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 7742 Alico Rd Ft.Myers, FL 33192 Changed: 01/30/2014 Mailing Address 7742 Alico Rd Ft.Myers, FL 33192 Changed: 01/30/2014 Reaistered Aaent Name & Address TORRES, DAVID E 7742 Alico Rd. Ft.Myers, FL 33192 Address Changed: 01/30/2014 Authorized Person(s) Detail Name & Address Title MGR TORRES, DAVID E 7742 Alico Rd Ft.Myers, FL 33192 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2014 01/30/2014 2015 01/1212015 http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/ScarcliResultDetail?inquirytype=Entity... 1/19/2017 Detail by Entity Name Page 2 of 2 2016 01/25/2018 • Document Images 0112WOi-ANNWLREPORT NCW i111aeB I11 PUf IMIIBI mI1 P2015-ANNNAL REPORT Y imapeln POF fgmal Ott 014-ANNIML REPORT New lmagelO POF lm0e1 04138013-ANNW RWORT Nnr lmeOeln POF Jamal =14 12- FW" LImXeE llNllav VkwlmaOeln PCFIamN • • rag. m,..u.w ✓ aan, o�..u. ✓ cnwnmm http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearchISearchResultl)etail?inquirytype=Entity... 1/18/2017 Lindsav Robin From: StoneScott <ScottStone@colliergov.net> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 4:38 PM To: Lindsay Robin Cc: BeasleyRachel; Alexis Crespo Subject: RE: Lord's Way PDI (PL20170000444) - Resubmittal Thanks, Lindsay. Please reference this e-mail and our discussion in your response to my review comment. Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney Collier County Attorney's Office (239)252-5740 From: Lindsay Robin [mailto:Lindsay.Robin@waldropengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 4:21 PM To: StoneScott Cc: BeasleyRachel; Alexis Crespo Subject: Lord's Way PDI (PL20170000444) - Resubmittal Hi Scott - I have sorne additional information for you regarding the resubmittal for the Lord's Way PDI that I submitted today on CityView. In regards to your equitable interest question — I know we discussed that you were OK knowing David Torres was the authorized agent for the LLC, but here is a more detailed breakdown for your information. David E. Torres Revocable Trust 20% Carolyn Toll 1% Taylor Toll 1% Courtney Toll 1% Jennifer B. Toll Revocable Trust 77% Thank you, Lindsay F. Robin, MPA Project Planner i I I • >N �r �NGI(V�ER1N�i CIVIL ENGINEERING I PLANNING I LANDSCAPE ARCHffEMRE Direct: E: lindsav.robin PwaIdropengineering.com Office: P: (239) 405-7777 J F: (239) 405-7899 www.waldropeneineering.com NOTICE: Upon receipt of any electronic file/data from Waldrop Engineering, P.A., you are agreeing to the following: This file/data is for informational purposes only. It is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this 1 electronic file/data with the actual project site conditions. Recipient agrees to Indemnify and hold harmless Waldrop Engineering, P.A. for any defects or errors in this file/data • Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Ll �f ,ENGINEERING LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST • :7 . COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net • 0 Collier County ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing ersonnel priorto Pre -application meetina. please allow 3 days for processin . Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist foreach Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SOP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIP](insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC(Project Name Change) ❑ TOR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑Q OTHER Insubstantial Change to a PUD (Poll LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) See attached. S14 T50 R26 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, orassociate with, legal description if more than one) 00418360002;00418320000;00416960006 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 3740 The Lords Way, Naples, FL 34114 • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Lords Way PDI PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (d applicable) n/a PROPOSED STREET NAMES (d applicable) n/a SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (forexisting projects/sites only) SDP or AR or PL # 20170000126 CO ler GOKYlty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 0 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: [E Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Lindsay Robin Phone: 239-908-3079 Email[Fax:lindsayr@waldropengineering.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00416960006 Folio Number 00418320000 Folio Number 00418360002 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by �----1 Date: 1 / 19 / 2 017 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, i Lomer t.ounty rroperty Appraiser Page 1 of I Property Summary • Parcel No. 00418360002 Site Adr. Name / Address LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD • littp://www.collierappraiser.coin/inain_ searchBecorddetail.html?Map=No&ColioNum=00418360002 1/18/2017 City FT MYERS State FL Zip 33192 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5614 000100 047 5814 14 50 26 10 Legal 14 50 26 El/2 OF W 1/2 OF NEl/4 OF SW 1/4 10.00 AC Millage Area O 39 Millage Rates O `Calculations SubJCondo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code O 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.245 6.258 11.503 Latest Sales History 2016 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) • Date Book -Page Amount Land Value $ 500,000 06/30/16 5289-2170 $ 900,000 (+) Improved Value $ 0 06/28/16 5289-2166 $ 0 (=) Market Value $ 500,000 12/27/05 3954-1352 $ 0 11/25/02 3160-1204 $0 (-) 10% Cap $233,800 06/17/02 3057-205 $1,842,800 (=) Assessed Value $ 266,200 01/24/02 2968-2799 $ 220,000 (_) School Taxable Value $ 500,000 12/29/00 2759-2996 $ 175,000 (_) Taxable Value $ 266,200 02/16/95 2031-390 $ D If all Values shown above equal thls parcel was created after the final Tax Roll 02/16/95 2031-389 $0 05/01/89 1439-2004 $ 120,000 08/01/84 19.58-159 $ 75,000 • littp://www.collierappraiser.coin/inain_ searchBecorddetail.html?Map=No&ColioNum=00418360002 1/18/2017 %.older County rroperty i►ppraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00418320000 Name / Address LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD City FT MYERS Map No. Strap No. 5B14 000100 046 5B14 Page 1 of 1 Site Adr. 3790 THE LORDS WAY, NAPLES, FL 34114 State FL Section Township Range 14 50 26 Legal 14 50 26 W1/2 OF E1/2 OF NE1/4 OF SW1/4 10.00 AC Millage Area @ 39 Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER Use Code 0 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 06/30/16 5289-2170 $ 900,000 06/28/16 5289-2166 $ 0 10/24/11 4730-1760 $ 0 07/14/11 4703-1137 $ 350,000 03/03/11 4674-2219 $ 716,300 03/03/11 4674-2218 $ 0 01/21/11 4674-2216 $ 0 01/20/11 4674-2217 $ 0 03/01/05 3742-2529 $ 750,000 06/17/99 2559-3475 $ 0 08/10/98 2449-2379 $ 150,000 12/27/95 2132-127 $ 105,000 02/16/95 2031-388 $ 0 Zip 33192 Acres *Estimated 10 M)Ilage Rates 0 *Calculations School Other Total 5.245 6.258 11.503 2016 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) L Land Value $ 500,00 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 500,000 (-) 10% Cap $ 233,800 (=) Assessed Value $ 266,200 (_) School Taxable Value $ 500,000 (_) Taxable Value $ 266,200 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll • http://www.collierappraiser.coinlmain_searchlRecorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00418320000 1/18/2017 Lomer Lounry rroperty Appraiser Page I of I Property Summary • Parcel No. 00416960006 Site Adr. 3740 THE LORDS WAY, NAPLES, FL 34114 Name / Address LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD http://w .collierappraiser.coin/main_ seareb/Recorddetail.11tml?Map=No&FolioNum=00416960006 1/18/2017 City FT MYERS State FL Zip 33192 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres "Estimated 5814 000100 009 5814 14 50 26 10 Legal 14 50 26 E7/2 OF E7/2 OF NE1/4 OF SW 1/4, OR 1515 PG 899 Millage AmaO 39 Millage Rates -Calculations Sub./Condo 100 -ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code O 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.245 6.258 11.503 Latest Sales History 2016 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) •Date Book -Page Amount Land Value $ 500,000 06/30/16 5289.2170 $ 900,000 (+) Improved Value $ 0 06/28/16 5289-2166 $ 0 (=) Market Value $ 500,000 10/24/11 4730-1760 $ 0 07/14/11 4703-1137 $350,000 1-) 10%Cap $233,800 03/03/11 4674-2224 $ 713,000 (_) Assessed Value $ 266,200 03/03/11 4674-2223 $ 0 (_) School Taxable Value $ 500,000 01/21/11 4674-2221 $ 0 (_) Taxable Value $ 266,200 01/20/11 4674-2222 $ 0 If all Values shown above equal a this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 03/01/05 3742-1829 $ 750,000 12/13/00 2754-304 $ 40,000 03/26/90 1515-899 $ 80,000 04/01/89 1433.855 $0 10/01/88 1387-290 $0 08/01/85 1.148-472 $ 75,000 http://w .collierappraiser.coin/main_ seareb/Recorddetail.11tml?Map=No&FolioNum=00416960006 1/18/2017 LOCATION MAP Wad Photography. January tkb" - 2016 - Aunt • 2016 • 11 0 pENGINEERING • 0 LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO PUD DOCUMENT FOR CAO Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD Amend Ordinance 14-11 AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT B, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE l; EXHIBIT C-2, TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT; EXHIBIT E, LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC, OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 14-11, LORD'S WAY 30 ACRE RPUD. The "Development Standards Table l," labeled as Exhibit B of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 14-11, the Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, is hereby amended. The "Typical Lot Layout," labeled as Exhibit C-2 of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 14-11, the Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, is hereby amended. The "List of Requested Deviations from LDC," labeled as Exhibit E of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 14-11, the Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD, is hereby amended. • 0 INENGINEERING • • LORD'S WAY 30 -ACRE RPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20170000444 LOCATION MAP LORD'S WAY 30 LLC 0 LOCATION MAP AGENDA ITEM 3-F coder County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING: JULY 27, 2017 SUBJECT: ZLTR (CUD)-PL20170000096, FOUNDERS PLAZA PUD APPLICANT/AGENT: Applicant: Angel's Medical Company 6080 Autumn Oaks Lane Naples, FL 34119 PROPERTY OWNER: CLA Group Holding Company, LLC 5248 Golden Gate Parkway, Suite 600 Naples, FL 34116 REOUESTED ACTION: Angel's Medical Company requests affirmation of a zoning verification letter issued by the Planning and Zoning Division pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06, in which County staff determined that the proposed use of adult daycare (SIC 8322) is comparable in nature to other permitted principal uses in Tracts "C," "D," and "E" under Section 4.3 A. of the Founders Plaza PUD, Ordinance No. 02-68, as amended. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway, approximately one third mile east of Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 13.33E acres. ZLTR(CUD)-PL20170000096 Page t of 5 Foundees Plaza PUD SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: Subject: Founder's Plaza Planned Unit Development (PUD) North: Golden Gate Parkway Right -of -Way (ROW) and then property zoned Founder's Plaza PUD East: A canal and then Founder's Plaza PUD South: Residences zoned RMF -6 West: Founder's Plaza PUD and then Golden Gate Parkway ROW Aerial Photo (Arc Header) PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Applicant seeks a determination that an adult daycare, Standard Industrial Code (SIC) 8322, is comparable and compatible with the permitted uses in Section 4.3.A of the Founders Plaza Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance 02-68, as amended. ZLTR(CUD)-PL20170000096 Page 2 of 5 Founder's Plaza PUD The applicant requested a Zoning Verification Letter (ZLTR) from the Planning Manager on March 14, 2017. The Planning Manager issued a ZLTR stating that the use of an adult daycare, SIC 8322, is comparable and compatible with the listed uses in the Founder's Plaza PUD. This hearing is to seek affirmation of that opinion by the HEX. ANALYSIS: LDC Section 10.02.06 J. Lb, Comparable Use Determinations, states: "The County Manager or Designee may issue a zoning verification letter to determine whether a use within a PUD is consistent and compatible with the surrounding uses within the PUD. To be effective, the zoning verification letter shall be approved by the BCC by resolution, at an advertised public hearing." The BCC delegated this duty to the Hearing Examiner through Ordinance 2013-25. The comparable analysis of adult day care to the uses in this PUD are threefold: 1. similar zoning, 2. external impacts and 3. business character. An adult day care center, SIC 8322, is a permitted use in the Commercial Professional and General Office District (C-1), the Commercial Convenience District (C-2), the Commercial Intermediate District (C-3), the General Commercial District (C-4), and the Heavy Commercial District (C-5) of the LDC. Uses in Section III and IV of the Founder's Plaza PUD permit professional offices and commercial uses found in the C-1 through C-5 zoning of the LDC; adult day cares are permitted uses in C-1 through C-5 of the LDC. Adult day care falls into a similar permitted LDC zoning range as the permitted uses outlined in Section III and IV of this PUD; adult day care is of similar zoning to the uses in this PUD. Additionally, Section 1.6 of this PUD states it "will include a mixture of professional offices, an existing church and commercial uses;" an adult daycare can be seen as a part of that mixture of professional uses based on how the applicant asserts it will function. Per the applicant, transportation of clientele will be a door-to-door service where "90% of the patients will be picked/dropped by our transportation." Specifically, the applicant states, "private and safe transportation provided by the business will drop off and pick up individuals." The total square feet for the adult day care will be 3,800; this is in the Park East Plaza, in Tract E, of the Founder's Plaza PUD. The parking calculation for an adult day care is 1 per employee of the largest work shift plus 1 space for every 10 adults. Per the applicant, approximate number of employees of the largest shift, from Sam to 5pm, will be 16; the applicant states there will be a maximum of 80 elderly clientele. Thus, the total required parking would be 16 (employee calculation) + 8 (clientele calculation) = 24 parking spaces. Two uses permitted in Section 4.3.A of this PUD are retail and libraries. Retail is calculated at 1 space per 250 square feet and libraries at 1 per 200 square feet; thus, given 3,200 square feet, retail would require 13 spaces and a library 16 spaces. While retail (13 required spaces) and libraries (16 required spaces) would require less parking than an adult day care (24 required spaces), the required 24 parking spaces would be reduced via two ways because of business functioning. More specifically, 90% of the clientele will be bused to the facility and employees will be required to park in the rear; both help to elevate the required parking calculation. There is no trip generator for adult day care in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation Manuel, and thus no way to get an actual traffic ZLTR(CUD)-PL20170000096 Page 3 of 5 Founder's Plaza PUD calculation without an official study. It is Staff's opinion that the proposed employee and clientele transportation structure will provide an external traffic impact similar in nature to the uses in this PUD. The operational function of this adult day care will be similar to churches, permitted in Section III, and libraries, permitted in Section IV, of this PUD in that they both offer educational and extracurricular activities which service a similar demographic. The proposed adult day care will provide a space to meet where elderly clientele can "socially interact with others" engaging in "entertainment according to individual interests, games, movie -clubs, tai chi -clubs, news clubs." All activities will be within the facility; there will be no outdoor activities. Thus, it is Staff's opinion that the business character of this adult day care will be similar in nature to permitted uses in Section III and Section IV of this PUD. Based upon above analysis, the use of an adult daycare is comparable/compatible use of permitted uses within Section III and IV of the Founder's Plaza PUD. It is the determination of the Planning Manager that the use of an adult daycare, SIC 8322, is comparable and compatible to the permitted principal uses in Tracts "C," "D," and "E" under Section 4.3 A. of the Founders Plaza PUD, Ordinance No. 02-68, as amended. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report 7/5/2017. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner affirm the opinions of the Zoning Manager that: The use of adult daycare (SIC 8322) is comparable in nature to other permitted principal uses in Tracts "C," "D," and "E" under Section 4.3 A. of the Founders Plaza PUD, Ordinance No. 02-68, as amended with one stipulation. Stipulation: That parking does not exceed 16 spaces. This parking requirement was derived from library parking calculations at this daycare's square footage; a library has similar operational functioning as an adult daycare. Attachments: A. Zoning Verification Letter B. Application ZLTR(CUD)-PL20170000096 Page 4 of 5 Founder's Plaza PUD PREPARED BY: RACHEL BEA Y, SENIOR PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: 7,15 7 RAYMOO V�BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING�IVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION ZLTR(CUD}PL20170000096 Page 5 of 5 Founders Plaza PUD CAT County Growth Management Department — Planning & Regulation Zoning Services Division March 28, 2017 Deysi Iglesias 6080 Autumn Oaks Lane Naples Florida 34119 Re: Zoning Verification Letter ZLTR (CUD)-PL20170000096; Zoning Verification Letter — Comparable Use Determination for the Founders Plaza Planned Unit Development, 5248 Golden Gate Parkway, located within in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, of unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Property ID/Folio: 66030001042. Dear Ms. Iglesias: This letter is in response to a Comparable Use Determination (CUD) application which was submitted by the applicant on the behalf of Clinics Los Angeles. The applicant requests a determination from the Zoning Manager and affirmation from the Office of the Hearing Examiner that the use of an adult daycare, Standard Industrial Code (SIC) 8322, is comparable and compatible with the permitted uses in Section 4.3.A of the Founders Plaza Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance 02-68, as amended. The applicable ordinance regulating the zoning and use of the subject property is the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Ordinance 04-41, as amended. The current Official Zoning Atlas, an element of the LDC, reveals the subject property has a zoning designation of the Founders Plaza PUD, Ordinance 02-68, as amended. The requested location, within this PUD's Master Plan, is Tract E; allowable uses are listed in Section IV, 4.3 Permitted Uses. Please note that per 4.3.A. I. "all permitted uses and structures listed under Section 3.3A of this Document, except #4" are permitted uses for Tracts C, D, and E, in addition to the other uses listed under 4.3.A. The comparability review parameters of this application are threefold: 1. similar zoning, 2. external impacts and 3. business character. Adult day care center, SIC 8322, is a permitted use in the Commercial Professional and General Office District (C-1), the Commercial Convenience District (C-2), the Commercial Intermediate District (C-3), the General Commercial District (C-4), and the Heavy Commercial District (C-5). Section 1.6 of the Founder's Plaza PUD states it, "will include a mixture of professional offices, an existing church and commercial uses." Uses in Section III and IV permit professional offices and commercial uses permitted in Cl through C5 of the LDC; adult day cares are permitted uses in Cl through C5 of the LDC. Thus, adult day care falls into a similar permitted LDC zoning range of the permitted uses outlined in Section III and IV of this PUD. The external impact of the proposed use of adult daycare will be minimized as a result of the busing of clientele and the designated employee parking in the rear. Per the applicant, transportation of elderly clientele will be door-to-door service, `to facilitate door to door transportation" and provide "private and safe transportation provided by the business will drop off and pick up individuals." Additionally, the applicant states that "90% of the patients will be picked/dropped by our transportation." The total square feet for the adult day care will be 3,800; this is located in the Park East Plaza of the Founder's Plaza PUD. The parking calculation for an adult day care is 1 per employee of the largest work shift plus I space for every 10 adults. Per the applicant, approximate number of employees of the largest shift, 8-5, will be 16; the applicant states there will be a Attachment A maximum of 80 elderly clientele. Thus, the total required parking would be 16 (employee calculation) + 8 (clientele calculation) = 24 parking spaces. Two uses permitted in Section 4.3.A of this PUD are retail and libraries; retail is calculated at 1 space per 250 square feet and libraries at 1 per 200 square feet; thus, given 3,200 square feet, retail would require 13 spaces and a library 16 spaces. While retail (13 required spaces) and libraries (16 required spaces) would require less parking than an adult day care (24 required spaces), the required 24 parking spaces would be reduced via two ways as a result of business functioning. More specifically, 90% of the clientele will be bused to the facility and employees will be required to park in the rear; both help to elevate the required parking calculation. There is no trip generator for adult day care in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation Manuel, and thus no way to get an actual traffic calculation without an official study. The business character of the facility will be similar in nature to permitted uses in Section III and Section IV of this PUD; more specifically, the operational function will be similar to churches, permitted in Section III, and libraries, permitted in Section IV, in that they both offer educational and extracurricular activities which service a similar demographic. The proposed adult day care will provide a space to meet where elderly clientele can, "socially interact with others" engaging in, "entertainment according to individual interests, games, movie - clubs, tai chi -clubs, news clubs." All activities will he within the facility; there will be no outdoor activities. The Zoning Manager has reviewed the application and submittal documents and finds the argument made to be compelling. It has been concluded that an adult day care is comparable and compatible to the permitted uses in Section IV and Section III of this PUD; it has been found comparable and compatible in regard to similar zoning, external impacts, and business character. Therefore, in accordance with the PUD under Section III, 3.3 Permitted Uses #22 adult day care, SIC 8322, is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses in Section III and IV. Disclaimer: Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Please be advised that the information presented in this verification letter is based on the Collier County LDC and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendment(s) to either of these documents could affect the validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited to, concurrency related to the provision of adequate public facilities, environmental impact, and other requirements of the Collier County LDC or related ordinances. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (239)252-8202 or e-mail: rachelbeasley@colliergov.net. Researched and prepared by: Rachel Beasley, Planner Zoning Services Section C: Annis Moxam, Addressing Section Laurie Beard, PUD Monitoring Reviewed by: /'�R-cA/��- Raymorlq Bellows, Zoning Manager Zoning Services Section e-r G01414ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 280€1 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 w .collier ov.net (239) 2S2-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Zoning Verification Letter - Comparable Use Determination LDC sections 2.£19.00 A, 10m0106 J & Code of Laws section: 2-83 s 2-90 _Chapter . of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER CUD- PL20170000096 PROJECT NAME 5248 Golden Gate Parkway DATE PROCESSED DATE: 1-10-2017 DUE: 2-10-2017 PUD Zoning District Straight Zoning District APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): W $ 1"la-S Address: (90 9 rn 0"S L" City: �Qk I)LpS State: T-tQk ZIP: 'J`((l � Telephone:`bOS"5_5+R-34L _Cell:Fax: 2-601 _!�3/ a3&Z E-Mail Address: d 0. C i ►tiiCoJOS caviJ-e5 . �C�Z tGlQ(�I�S�� `�Qh� • C.�rI Name of Agent: Firm: Address: City: State: ZIP: Telephone: Cell: _ Fax: E-Mail Address: PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address: � 1Q Q V%w Folio Number: (0 (Q 030()o /0 42 Property Owners Name: i6A h LN4 DETERMINATION REQUEST The determination request and justification for the use must be done by a certified land use planner or a land use attorney. Provide the completed request on a separate attached sheet. Please be very specific and include the SIC Code, if known. The request should adhere to the following format: "I request a determination from the Planning Manager and approval from the Office of the Hearing Examiner, that the use of is comparable and compatible with the permitted uses in the PUD or in the Straight Zoning District." 9/25/2014 Page 1 of 2 Attachment B COLLIER GOVERNMENT 'TH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 + 40 x SUBMITTAL REQUIRE ENTS CHECKLIST See Chapter 3 G.6 of the Administrative Code for submittal requirements. The following items are to be submitted with the application packet. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County ❑ ❑ ❑ website) Determination request and the justification for the use ❑ ❑ ❑ PUD Ordinance and Development Commitment information ❑ Electronic Copies of all documents *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all ❑ ❑ ❑ materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. FEE REQUIREMENTS: ❑ Application: $1,000.00; Additional Fees of $100 per hour will be charged as needed upon completion of review and research. Payment of Additional Fees will be required prior to the release of the verification. ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 I - q -9LIZ Al �- Applica Sig re I Date S I l 7 C ---s Printed game Please be advised that the zoning letter is based upon the available records furnished by Collier County and what was visible and accessible at the time of inspection. This report is based on the Land Development Code that is in effect on the date the report was prepared. Code regulations could be subject to change. While every attempt has been made to ensure the accuracy or completeness, and each subscriber to or user of this report understands that this department disclaims any liability for any damages in connection with its use. In addition, this department assumes no responsibility for the cost of correcting any unreported conditions. 9/25/2014 Page 2 of 2 • LJ ADULT DAY CARE 5248 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 • CLINICA 10 Los Nl;�qeres 5248 Golden Gate Parkway NAPLES, FL, 34116 (239)234-6835 ***Privileged and Confidential, for Professional use only*** March 14th of 2017. To Collier County Office of Zoning. We recently contacted you about a request in zoning change for the property located at 5248 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, Fl, 34116. The objective: that you authorize a zoning change that allow us to open there an Adult Day Care there. We would like to share the story of this idea. This idea came after opening and growing Clinica "Los Angeles', also in Golden Gate, in an area of critical needs. Our patient population had grown exponentially and the clinic had been a success. During our daily labor we have observed with sadness that the elderly patients are frequently left alone at home by their family members and they feel isolated and quite often 40 disclose feelings of sadness associated with lack of social interaction. Sometimes they come to the clinic, not because they are sick, but because they want to talk, hopefully see some friends they made there or simply to share a desert they made. Some of them had asked explicitly if the clinic is planning to a pa em r_ : p o wn We thought that they have a point! Our objectives with this project, for your consideration, are: -To provide a sense of purpose into the daily life of our elderly population by creating a place that gives them structure, the possibility to sgaial4oWnterackwitheothers, the chance to continue growing despite age or physical limitations, -To keep the elderly from suffering from isolation that could potentially create feelings of loneliness, helplessness and even depression, -To provide families of elderly the security that their parents or grandparents are in asafe place, cared for and immediately attended if there is a health emergency, -To provide elderly population that live alone a place to meet and be social, -To help families of less economic resources to have access to care for their elderly, as opposed to expensive private sitters, -To ensure with a proper plan of nutrition and exercise that our elderly keep "mens sana in corpore sano'; is • • 0 -To provide experienced psychologic support through groups aimed at cultural awareness, learning of new skills, processing of feelings appropriate to their ages and experience, -To tOg family the detour from their way to work reducing risk of a senteeism and tardiness, -To provide entertainment according to individual interests, games, movie -club, book -club, tai chi - club, news -club... -To create an environment for the elderly that creates happiness, hope and something to look for the following day... This is a space that is approved to be a Church or a Library. Feasibility of changing in zoning to Adult Day Care could be facilitated by the following considerations: -The space exists, it will not be built or rebuilt, only redecorated inside for appropriate fufr ning, -This place would serve a maximum oAgOOMMIFftividuals and will provide a job ers of different skills, education and training, -Pkat b` ' nspG1 ' d by the business will drop off and pick up individuals and we plan entrance being through the si e o minimize any disruptions on neighbors or excess of traffic in the area. This is in compliance with section 1V --tract E, -We plan a_pyr igg a o*9ap that will be on stricte"n uthofiz sis only and there won't be any through traffic, -We are planning on planting a county approved garden benefiting environment and enhancing the beauty of the neighborhood, We are very enthusiastic about our idea of an Adult Day Care. it would bring a most needed service to our area. Please, consider this request with an open soul. P/ease, grant us the change. Sincerely, Your most obliged, Deysi Iglesias. , 44�, "W�CLA%V' Group Holding Company LLC 5248 Golden Gate Parkway Suite 600 Naples FL, 34116 Israel Iglesias PL20170000046 To whom it may concern, June 20, 2017 The present letter is to state that I, Lsrael ldesias am the Manager of CLA Group bolding Company, LLC and I consent to Angel's Medical Company, Submit Petition P1.201700000%. N arty questions, Please contact me at 305-537-8344. F*, r� • 0 C7 • • 3/9/2017 5248 Golden Gate Pkwy - Google Maps Gockgle MapS 5248 Golden Gate Pkwy Imagery 02017 Google, Map data 02017 Google 20 ft 5248 Golden Gate Pkwy Naples, FL 34116 At this location II Primo Pizza & Wings 41 * * * -A Pizza 52413 Golden Gate Pkwy Informal spot for classic pies & wings httpsY/www.google.com/maps/place/5248+Golden+Gate+Pkwy,+Naples,+FL+34116/@26.1772091,-81.7114926, 134a,20y,172.9h,45.06t/data=!3m 111e3!4m 13!1m... 1/2 0 FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION I, ISRAEL IGLESIAS 1��n t name), as CEO (title, if applicable) of RAF'. (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner �/ applicant contract purchaserland that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imp 99d hyl theem? H � action. 5. Well authorize UU�t Ltd to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes. • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pros. or v. p►e& • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L. L C.) or limited Company (L C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member" • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the `general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words as trustee" • • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the fa s stated in it are true. I k x W Lk -A -a-0):1 1A I TJ Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoi g instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on 4 (date) by ,� I (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as S ea .r te _ who is personally known to me or who has produced t ri Y f,. Qev,S- (type o identificati n) as identification. :.,%/ ' STAMP/SEAL Siqnature of Notafo "ublic of�:!4. RRMSIAPERU * * MY COMMISSION O FF 24M EXPIRES: June 23, 2019 "eOF FLBended Thru W Nmry SMvft . CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3024/14 • • 0 r, s NJ E n U C no O C � d _a O � 06 O m U O p d 1� m e C N � C O E a E C N d E 0 V u Tn d g C C � U d O m E c r m N 4 E m E • FOUNDERS PLAZA PUD MASM PLM Land Use Table Building Area 3.4 Awa MW Paved Area 8.0 Acta 145!1 Green Area 3.93Acm 130961 Total Area: 13.33Aeees (100li1 N p !1C aw.aor�tt�s®w�awawi+aaw • All access points and median openings that are depicted on the Master Plan are conceptual in nature. The Transportation Department shall approve the final access points into the project and the median design at the time of site development plan approval. • Prepared for. ftrk East Development, Ltd. 3395 Park Centras Court Nspiea, FL 34109 --my 14, goat 40108-4 1/10/17, 9:14 AM Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. E 66030001042 Site Adr. 15248 GOLDEN GATE PKWY Name / Address I CLA GROUP HOLDING CO LLC 5248 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SUITE 600 City]NAPLES State FL Zlp 34116 Map No Strap No Section Township Range Acres stimated 41328 537660 241328 28 4926 Legal SPARK EAST PLAZA A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2 Millage Area 0 20 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 537660 - PARK EAST PLAZA A CONDOMINIUM School Other Total Use Code 0 407 - COMMERCIAL 5.245 6.9884 12.2334 i Latest Sales History 2016 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book -Page Amount Land Value $ 0 11/04/16 5336-3700 $ 1,025,000 (+� Improved Value $ 804,540 04/11 /14 025 6-523 $ 100 , __ - Market Value $ 804,540 Assessed Value $ 804,540 € (�l Taxable Value $ 804,540 Taxable Value $ 804,5401 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 0 about:blank Page 1 of 1 • - NOTE: --------------INDICATES SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY --------------INDICATES UNIT BOUNDARY 27TH CT. S.W. — 1 ® C-4 SANTA BARBARA® SOUARE yes -••--- GOLDEN GATE f h a PB,. Pg Re RA1C UNIT 1 5/60. 9/100. 11/11 1 UNIT 2 5/65, 9/116. 7/65, 7/69 2 UNIT 3 5/97. 11/9 3 UNIT 4 5/107, 9/121 5 UNIT 5 5/117 7 UNIT 6 5/124, 9/1 UNIT 7 5/135 9 UNIT 8 5/147. 9/107A 10 rmmm ST. JOHN NEUMANN SCHOOL 141 PAI.a i 5 iT • 24 31ST A 5.M 1 ri 2 at ! RSF-3 9}T$ AVENUE S.W. H 13 N N1 t# 7 T M f 3 # m 11 7# N » t7 GOLDEN GATE C! 963W 6II 6(it wrR z' ;�_�eeTa=meg'ag_ +gyp N8 8T'Tln$-�g�g6Ap�E�� ESg�Ld'S:B::S:CBs?88�^� 8 dSidfda RR�2 i>E:;dt -IL 7 II TROPICANA CANAL NUl j t # W-9 " I 543T A S.W. u SLW+1 2J\\\ 1 I 1 f4 1 \� U � 5E TREATMENT 47T j » T, n . � c.U. a 1 i # ) # i tl n 1t V N� i[ ! ! },jir^D AVENUE S.W. t P t # T7 st 1: t 1 T 1 29 1 m» to wn" Alit M 15 i Pax V TAC O t1AL i AXAS Wt" m At Art 40"a 91' Anvoct i 61zi cr .0 C4 -AJ CT 09 �irs #y COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA • �®�^�+S � ®is� ®Eli �Y9� i 5 iT • 24 31ST A 5.M 1 ri 2 at ! RSF-3 9}T$ AVENUE S.W. H 13 N N1 t# 7 T M f 3 # m 11 7# N » t7 GOLDEN GATE C! 963W 6II 6(it wrR z' ;�_�eeTa=meg'ag_ +gyp N8 8T'Tln$-�g�g6Ap�E�� ESg�Ld'S:B::S:CBs?88�^� 8 dSidfda RR�2 i>E:;dt -IL 7 II TROPICANA CANAL NUl j t # W-9 " I 543T A S.W. u SLW+1 2J\\\ 1 I 1 f4 1 \� U � 5E TREATMENT 47T j » T, n . � c.U. a 1 i # ) # i tl n 1t V N� i[ ! ! },jir^D AVENUE S.W. t P t # T7 st 1: t 1 T 1 29 1 m» to wn" Alit M 15 i Pax V TAC O t1AL i AXAS Wt" m At Art 40"a 91' Anvoct i 61zi cr .0 C4 -AJ CT TIE C"V C) CWR:R, FLN11CA. ACCPIEC JLNE 22. 2004 #y COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TWP 49S RNG 26E SECS) 26 50 1/; MAP NUOSEIII: 9628S II l I1 • FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION I, ISRAEL IGLESIAS nt name), as CEO (title, if applicable) of� (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant[ contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions irnp yl the Mgt, action. 5. We/I authorize ut L��l to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes. • !f the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pros. or v. pros. • !f the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.LC.) or Limited Company (LC.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member" • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • ff the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words 'as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the fa stated in it are true. I kA. &I q --A- aO) Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The fore, i g instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on s (date) by , (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known tome or who has produced 'bre ::,1 Y f, mQvl3.9 (type o identificati n) as identification. ' STAMPISEAL Signature of of ublic MSMPEREZ # * MY COMMISSION A FF 243225 EXPIRES: June 23, 2019 `�'+,�.�.�� eondedinruBudpeEN�narySerrlres CP108-COA-0011S11SS REV 3/24/14 BeaslevRachel From: Deysi Iglesias[Dig lesias@clinicalosangeles.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:02 AM To: BeasleyRachel 0 Subject: Re: Comparable Use Determination: a few further questions Good Morning Rachel B.:) 1. Will there be any outside activities with clientele? No 2. What will be the makeup of "the 21 workers of different skills, education and training", will there be any skilled nursing? This can be a rough guess as I realize the exact plans may not be nailed down yet? Registered Nurses (1) HHA (5) CNA (7) Medical Asst. (1) front desk (1) Administrator (2) Kitchen Staff (2) Psychiatrist (1) Beauty Stylist (1). 3. What will be a general shift of employees, 8 hours?10? 4? This is question steams from trying to nail down what your parking will be? Monday- Friday ( 8:00 A.M- 5:00 P.M ). 4. What is the square footage of building for proposed adult day care? 3,800 sq. ft, and assigned to us we have 78 Parking Spaces plus Restricted Area for Employees and Transportation. Thank You, Deysi Iglesias Office Manager Clinica Los Angeles 5038 Coronado Parkway 1 Naples, Fl 34116 PH (239) 234-6948 G� Fax (239) 331-2362 0 5easleY Rachel From: Deysi Iglesias [Diglesias@clinicalosangeles.net] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 1:54 PM To: BeasleyRachel Subject: Re: Comparable Use Determination: a few further questions Rachel, Qkj �1„ ` , Daily Employees 16 aily- 8:00 am - 5:00pm f C�` 90 % of the patients will be picked/dropped by our Transportation. Thank you again :) Deysi Iglesias Office Manager Clinica Los Angeles 5038 Coronado Parkway Naples, Fl 34116 PH (239) 234-6948 Fax (239) 331-2362 41 From: BeasleyRachel<RachelBeasley(a�coiliergov.net> To: Deysi Iglesias <Diglesias(Dclinicalosangeles.net> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 11:41 AM Subject: RE: Comparable Use Determination: a few further questions First, thank you for your responses to my follow-up questions. I have a little more questioning after having spoken with our transportation department. I'm just trying to get this nailed down so that its smooth sailing once composed! Okay, so I need a little more detail on the employee shift and how many are on during the biggest shift. I am reaching for more detail because I am looking to see if the adult day care parking calculations will be less than retail. The tricky part with adult day care parking calculations is that they require to know the biggest shift of the day and the total employees working during that shift. For example, if there are two shifts in a day, one from 7:30-1 (with 6 employees) and one from 1-5 (with 4 employees) then I would want to know the total employees from the largest shit, which in this case would be 7:30-1 and thus 6. Does that make sense? You can just give an estimate as I realize you may not have to 100% nailed down yet. Just to clarify, the entrance for the clientele drop-off and pick-up will be on the side of the building. Would you consider this akin, similar, to a drop-off and pick-up area that a child daycare would have? Would all adults be bused in? Could you give rough estimate of how many 20% bused to center? 45? 100? Again, thank you for responses. Thanks! Rachel ORDINANCE N0.02-6 8 WHEREAS, Tim Hancock, of Vanasse & Daylor, LLP, representing Park East Development, LTD, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T ORDAINED BY the Board of County Commissioner of Collier County, Florida, that: The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property located in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 9628N, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: - Ordinance Number 96.5, as amended, adopted on February 27, 1996, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. This Ordinance shall! become effective upon filing with the Department of State. is • NU ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91-102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL yt8��2�, ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 9628N BY CHANGING +rte °� THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED - - REAL PROPERTY FROM "PUD" TO "PUD" PLANNED ROM UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS PLAZA tivFOUNDERS PUD,FORPROPERTY LOCATED ON BOTH SIDES FO GOLDEN GATE w� �e[�Vg�9�'� PARKWAY AT THE SANTA BARBARA CANAL CROSSING IN GOLDEN GATE CITY, IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 13.33 ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 96.5, AS AMENDED, AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Tim Hancock, of Vanasse & Daylor, LLP, representing Park East Development, LTD, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T ORDAINED BY the Board of County Commissioner of Collier County, Florida, that: The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property located in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 9628N, as described in Ordinance Number 91-102, the Collier County Land Development Code, are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: - Ordinance Number 96.5, as amended, adopted on February 27, 1996, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. This Ordinance shall! become effective upon filing with the Department of State. is • PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners o: County, Florida, this -fflk day of �. 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT,E.,BROCK, Clerk JJ.... App an acid Legal Sufficiency Maijorigim. Student ' Assistant County Attorney GAdridwPUDA-2001-ar-431 /Ra/cw 1] BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONED COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's Office the l day of bWWW, 1=Z and acknowledgement of that fill received this _ day of Z By Deputy Clerk 0 Founders Plaza A PLANNED.UNIT DEVELOPMENT PREPARED FOR: Park East Development, Ltd. 5395 Park Central Court Naples, FL 34109 PREPARED BY: Tim Hancock, AICP 3001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 206 Naples, FL 34103 REVISED BY COLLIER COUNTY: September 30, 2002 0 DATE PUD DOCUMENT FILED: January 25, 2001 DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC: DATE APPROVED BY BCC: December 17, 2002 ORDINANCE NUMBER: 2002-68 EXHIBIT "A" :7 • L1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS: 2 LIST OF EXHIBITS: 3 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE: 4 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION: 5 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS: 7 SECTION III COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN FOR TRACTS `A' AND 'B': 9 SECTION IV COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN FOR TRACTS 'C', `D', and 'E 14 SECTION V COMMERCIAL AREA PLAN FOR TRACT 'F' 17 SECTION VI DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS: 20 2 LIST OF EXHIBITS Is PUD MASTER PLAN: EXHIBIT "A" • • i STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 13.33 acres of property in Collier County, as a Planned Unit Development to be known as Founders Plaza PUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The commercial facilities of the Founders Plaza PUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is within the Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial District Land Use Designation as identified on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map, as described in the Land Use Designation Description Section of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan permits commercial land uses in this area. 2. The subject property is located along both sides of Golden Gate Parkway, between 53rd Street Southwest and 52"d Terrace Southwest. This strategic location allows the project superior access for the location of commercial and professional office land uses, as permitted by the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. 3. The subject property's location in relation to existing or proposed community facilities and services permits the development's intensity of land uses as required in Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element. is 4. The project development is compatible and complimentary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element. • 5. The project development will assist in enhancing quality of life by improving the aesthetics of the project's neighborhood as described in Objective 1.4 of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. 6. The project development is planned to protect the functioning of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub -Element of the Public Facilities Element. 7. The project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations including the Growth Management Plan. 8. All final local development orders for this project are subject to Division 3.15, Adequate Public Facilities, of the Collier County Land Development Code. 4 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of Founders Plaza PUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property being 13.33 acres, more or less, and located in Section 28, Township 49 South, and Range 26 East, is described as: Lots 4, 5 & 6, Block 206, Lots 1— 4, Block 207, Lots 28- 31, Block 217 as recorded in Plat Book 5, Pages 124 through 134 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, together with Lots 1 -7 Block 243, Lots 1 -4, Block 262, and Lots 13- 16, Block 261, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Pages 135 -146 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP Lots 4, 5 and 6, Block 206 and Lots 1-4, Block 207 are owned by Bishop John J Nevins, Diocese of Venice, 1000 Pinebrook Road, Venice, Florida, 34292-1426. The balance of the property is owned by Park East Development, Ltd., 5395 Park Central Court, Naples, FL 34109. 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA A. The subject property is located on both sides of Golden Gate Parkway, between 53rd Street Southwest and 52"d Terrace Southwest in Golden Gate City (unincorporated Collier County), Florida. B. The subject property consists of 26 platted lots. The entire project site currently has PUD Zoning and is proposed to be rezoned to PUD. C. The properties identified on the PUD Master Plan (Exhibit A) as Tracts `A' and `B' have been developed for the parish, offices and parking for a church. This PUD document does not change any of the commitments or requirements as they relate to Tracts `A' and `B'. The intent of this PUD is to preserve the zoning on Tracts `A' and `B', and to modify the development standards on Tracts `C', `D', `E' and `F' to mirror recent changes to the Golden Gate Master Plan and to update the PUD Document with respect to those Tracts. 5 • • • D. Distance Between Principal Structures: Twenty (20) feet E. Minimum Floor Area: One thousand (1,000) square feet for the principal structure on the first habitable floor. F. Maximum Height: For principal structures twenty-five (25) feet plus ten (10) feet for any Parking area beneath the structures. For churches maximum building height shall not exceed forty-five (45) feet. G. Off -Street Parking and Loading Requirements: Shall be consistent with Division 2.3 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of site development plan approval. H. Open Space Requirements: A minimum of thirty (30) percent open space, as described in Section 2.2.20.3.5 of the Land Development Code, shall be maintained for the developed Parcels of land within the PUD. The petitioner shall submit data at the time of each Site Development Plan application that the subject parcel has a minimum of thirty (30) percent open space or that the subject parcel measured cumulatively with all previously developed parcels within the PUD will total a minimum of thirty (30) percent open space of the cumulative area. L Landscaping and Buffering Requirements: • I. A ten (10) foot wide Buffer -X" shall he constructed around the perimeter of Tracts 'A' and 'B', excluding driveways and sidewalks perpendicular to the adjacent road rights-of-way, and along the Santa Barbara Canal. Such Buffer "X" shall require one (1) shade tree per twenty (20) linear feet and a double hedgerow along its entirety, except where the PUD boundary abuts property that is not within the Golden Gate Professional Office Commercial District. Where the PUD boundary abuts property not within the Golden Gate Professional Office Commercial District, a fence or wall shall be constructed that is at least six (6) feet in height with a single hedge row on each side of the fence or wall. Fences and walls shall meet the requirements of Section 2.6.11 of the Land Development Code. Such fences shall be wooden, at least ninety-five percent (95%) opaque and designed and maintained to provide an architecturally finished appearance on both sides. Twenty-five (25) percent of such shade trees shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet in height, with a four (4) foot spread, and a one and three-quarter (1.75) inch caliper at time of planting and that will have a minimum canopy of fifteen (15) feet at time of maturity. The remaining seventy- five percent of such shade trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height, with a three (3) foot spread, a caliper of one and one-half (1.5) inches at time of planting, and will have a minimum canopy of fifteen (15) feet at maturity. All shmbs shall meet the requirements for shrubs as described in Section 2.4.4 of the Land Development Code. n U 11 8. Insurance carrier, agents and brokers (groups 6311-6399, 6411). 9. Legal services (group 8111). Is 10. Management and public relations services (groups 8741-8743, 8748). 11. Membership organizations (groups 8611, 8621). 12. Museums and art galleries (group 8412). 13. Churches (group 8661) with a maximum building height 45 feet. 14. Non -depository credit institutions (groups 6141-6163). 15. Personal services (groups 7221, 7291). 16. Public administration (groups 9111-9199, 9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661). 17. Real estate (groups 6512-6514, 6519, 6531-6553). 18. Research, development and testing services (group 8732). 19. Security and commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges, and services (groups 6211- 6289). 20. Transportation services (group 4724). 21. Veterinary services (group 0742, excluding outside kenneling). 22. Any other commercial use or professional service, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). B. Accessory Uses: Uses and structures that is accessory and incidental to the Permitted Uses within this PUD Document except for the overnight parking and storage of commercial vehicles in Tract "A". 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Minimum Lot Area: Twelve thousand (12,000) square feet. B. Minimum Lot Width: One hundred (100) feet. C. Minimum Yards: 1. Principal Structures: a. Front yards along Golden Gate Parkway — Forty (40) feet. b. Front yards along all other streets — Twenty-five (25) feet. c. Side yards between two lots within Tract `A' of the PUD — Ten (10) feet. d. Side yard abutting the PUD perimeter — Twenty-five (25) feet. e. Side yard abutting the Santa Barbara Canal — Twenty (20) feet. f. Rear yards — Twenty-five (25) feet. 2. Accessory Structures: Setbacks shall be as required by Division 2.6.2 of the Land Development Code in effect at time of building permit application, except small, architecturally designed canopies, intended to provide shelter from the sun and rain for pedestrians within designated pedestrian rest areas, shall only be required to be set back from the external boundaries of the PUD, a distance of ten (10) feet. 10 0 • 1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The project site is located within the Main Golden Gate Canal Sub -Basin. Water from the site flows westerly through the Santa Barbara Canal, southerly into the Gordon River, and finally into Naples Bay. Elevations within the project site range from 9 feet to 12 feet, with a majority of the site between I 1 and 12 feet. The entire site is within Flood Zone "X" per Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel#120067 0415 D. Per the USDA Soil Maps, the predominant soil type on the site is Urban Land Holopaw Basinger Complex. Approximately the eastern 10 percent of the site is Urban Land Matlancha Limestone Substratum Boca Complex. Since the lots have been previously filled, the project is composed mostly of weeds with occasional Australian Pines, Brazilian Peppers and Slash Pines. Lot #16, Block 261, Unit 7, is the only lot with a significant amount of non -exotic trees, that being approximately 15 Slash Pines. The exotic species are in the process of being eliminated from the site. 1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Founders Plaza PUD will include a mixture of professional offices, an existing church and commercial uses. The Master Plan is illustrated graphically as Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan. A Land Use Summary indicating approximate land use acreage is shown on the Plan. 1.7 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Founders Plaza Planned Unit Development Ordinance". n LJ SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the project as well as other project relationships. 2.2 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of the Founders Plaza PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Document, PUD -Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the Collier County Land Development Code shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of Founders Plaza shall become part of the regulations, which govern the manner in which the PUD site may be developed. D. Unless specifically waived through any variance or waiver provisions from any other applicable regulations, the provisions of those regulations not otherwise provided for in this PUD remain in full force and effect. E. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Division 3.15, Adequate Public Facilities, of the Collier County Land Development Code at the earliest, or next, to occur of either final site development plan approval, final plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES A. The project Master Plan is illustrated graphically by Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan. B. Minor modifications to Exhibit "A" maybe permitted at the time of Site Development Plan approval, subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code or as otherwise permitted by this PUD Document. C. In addition to the various areas and specific items shown in Exhibit "A", easements such as (utility, private, semi-public) shall be established and/or vacated within or along the individual lots, as may be necessary. 7 • • • 2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS A. Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan, constitutes the required PUD Development Plan. Any division of the property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the subdivision regulations and the platting laws of the State of Florida. B. The provisions of Division 3.3, Site Development Plans, of the Land Development Code, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided in said Division 3.3 prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. C. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructure improvements regarding any dedications and method for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. 2.5 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Amendments may be made to the PUD as provided in Section 2.7.3.5 of the Land Development Code. 0 E SECTION 111 0 COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN FOR TRACTS `A' AND `B' 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for Tracts `A' and 'B' -as shown on Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan. 3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated on the PUD Master Plan as Tracts `A' and `B' are intended to provide professional offices and low intensity commercial land uses. These Tracts are located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway, east of the Santa Barbara Canal, and are within the Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial District of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. 3.3 PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services (group 8721). 2. Business Services (groups 7311, 7313, 7322-7331, 7335-7338, 7361, 7371, 7373- 7376,7379). 3. Depository institutions (6021-6062). 4. Eating places [group 5812 (except carry -out restaurants; contract feeding; dinner theaters; drive-in and drive-through restaurants; fast food restaurants; food service, institutional; industrial feeding; pizzerias; restaurants, carry -out; submarine sandwich shops)]. 5. Engineering, architectural and surveying services (groups 8711- 8713). 6. Health services (groups 8011-8049). 7. Holding and other investment offices (groups 6712-6799). • W 12 2. Buffering shall not be required between platted lots or projects within the PUD or along the Santa Barbara Canal. 3. A minimum of ten (10) percent of the gross vehicular use area shall be landscaped. Required trees within the Parking Lot (Internal) Landscaping Areas shall be one (1) tree per seventy-five (75) square feet of Internal Landscaping Areas. These trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height with a minimum caliper of one and one-half (1.5) inches at time of planting and have a minimum canopy of fifteen (15) feet at maturity. All other requirements of Section 2.4.5 of the Land Development Code shall apply. 4. For building perimeter landscaping, each building shall have one (1) tree, four (4) shrubs, and twenty (20) square feet of planting area for each two hundred (200) square feet of first floor building area. These trees and plantings shall be planted in the areas adjacent to such buildings prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy. The trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height with a minimum caliper of one and one-half (1.5) inches at time of planting and have a minimum canopy of fifteen (15) feet at time of maturity. Planting areas shall consist of landscaped areas, raised planters or planter boxes with a minimum of one (1) shrub for each ten (10) square feet of planting area 5. At the time of preliminary site development plan application, the site plan shall show a front pedestrian rest area for each platted lot, including any fraction greater than one-half (1/2) of a platted lot, and a rear pedestrian rest area for each building. • (a) Front pedestrian rest areas, at a minimum, shall include the following: two (2) park benches; two (2) native shade trees and six (6) shrubs that are not counted towards any other landscaping requirements; a brick paver block or Bomanite (brick or stone design) sidewalk leading from the sidewalk along Golden Gate Parkway through the project's first row of parking; and one (1) architecturally compatible light post not exceeding sixteen (16) feet in height; all located within a minimum area of four hundred (400) square feet. The areas not utilized for these requirements shall be landscaped. The trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height with a minimum caliper of one and one-half (1.5) inches at time of planting, that will have a minimum canopy of fifteen (15) feet at maturity. (b) Rear pedestrian rest areas, at a minimum, shall provide the following: two (2) park benches; two (2) native shade trees and six (6) shrubs that are not counted towards any other landscaping requirements; a brick, paver block or Bomanite (brick or stone design) sidewalk leading from the adjacent building to the park benches; and one (1) architecturally compatible light post not exceeding sixteen (16) feet in height; all located within a minimum area of three hundred (300) square feet. The areas not utilized for these requirements shall be landscaped. Such minimum area shall be located adjacent to any building. The trees shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height with • 12 a minimum caliper of one and one-half (1.5) inches at time of planting that will have a minimum canopy of fifteen (15) feet at maturity. (c) Projects on lots within Tract `B" may relocate rear pedestrian rest areas within that same Tract, such as along the Canal, as long as all of the required amenities are provided. 6. The architecturally compatible lighting shall not exceed sixteen (16) feet in height and shall be provided along the rear of the lots previously occupied by alleys or cul-de-sacs. Such lighting facilities shall not create glare onto adjacent residential properties. D. SIGNS: All project signs shall be consistent with Division 2.5 of the Land Development Code • • 13 • SECTION IV COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN FOR TRACTS 'C', 'D' &'E' 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify specific development standards for Tracts 'C', 'D' and 'E' as identified on Exhibit A, PUD Master Plan. 4.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Tracts 'C', 'D' and 'E' on the PUD Master Plan are intended to provide professional offices and commercial land uses consistent with the Golden Gate Master Plan. These Tracts total +/- 6.85 of the +/-13.33 acres of the PUD and are located northwest, southeast and southwest of the intersection of the Golden Gate Parkway and the Santa Barbara Canal. All tracts lie within the Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial District. 4.3 PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitted principal uses and structures for Tracts "C",, D", & "E" as shown on Exhibit "A" PUD Master Plan: • 1) All permitted uses and structures listed under Section 3.3.A of this Document, except #4. 2) Apparel and accessory stores (groups 5611-5699). 3) Auto and home supply stores (groups 5531 and 7549, auto accessory dealers -retail, automobile parts dealers -retail and speed shops -retail only). 4) Eating places (group 5812, except carry out establishments, drive through only establishments, commissary restaurants, concession stands, contract feeding, food service -institutional, hamburger stands, hot dog stands, snack shops, soft drink stands and tea rooms, ice cream stands, industrial feeding and refreshment stands). 5) Food stores (groups 5411-5499 except convenience food stores - retail, grocery stores and supermarkets). 6) General merchandise stores (groups 5311-5399). 7) Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment stores (groups 5712- 5736). 8) Libraries (group 8231). 9) Miscellaneous repair services (groups 7629-7631 no electronic repair, except computer repair only in conjunction with sales.) 10) Miscellaneous retail (groups 5912-5963 except liquor stores, pawn shops and building materials 5992-5999). 11) Paint, glass and wallpaper stores (group 5231). 14 12) Personal services (groups 7212, 7221-7261, and 7291 except coin operated laundries, beauty shops and barber shops.) 0 13) United States. Postal Service (group 4311). 4.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Minimum Lot Area: Twelve thousand (12,000) square feet. B. Minimum Lot Width: One hundred (100) feet. C. Minimum Yards (Setbacks): I. Front yards along Golden Gate Parkway: Forty (40) feet. 2. Front yards along all other streets: Twenty-five (25) feet. 3. Side yards between development tracts: Ten (10) feet. 4. Side yards abutting the PUD perimeter: Fifteen (15) feet and 25 feet when abutting residential zoned properties. 5. Side yards abutting the Santa Barbara Canal: Fifteen (15) feet. 6. Rear yards: Twenty-five (25) feet. 7. Accessory structures: Setbacks shall be as required by Division 2.6.2 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application, except small, architecturally designed canopies, intended to provide shelter from the sun and rain for pedestrians, shall only be required to be set back from the external boundaries of the PUD a distance of ten (10) feet. • 8. Between Principal Structures: Fifteen (15) feet. D. Minimum Floor Area: 1,000 square feet for the principal structure, on the first floor. E. Height: Thirty-five (35) feet for the principal structures with no parking facilities allowed beneath structures. F. Off-street Parking and Loading: 1. As required by Division 2.3 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. 2. Each phase of development shall provide the minimum required amount of parking facilities required by Section 2.3 of the Land Development Code. G. Open Space Requirements: A minimum of thirty (30) percent open space, as described in Section 2.2.20.3.5 of the Land Development Code, shall be maintained for the developed parcels of land within the PUD. The petitioner shall submit data at the time of each site development plan application that the subject parcel provides a minimum of thirty (30) percent open space or that the subject parcel measured cumulatively with all previously developed parcels within the PUD will total a minimum of thirty (30) percent open space of the cumulative area. • 15 • H. Landscaping and Buffering requirements: 1. A ten -foot wide buffer "Y" shall be constructed around the perimeter of Tracts "C", "D" and "E". Such Buffer "Y" shall include one shade tree per twenty (20) linear feet and a double hedgerow along its entirety. Hedges shall be a minimum of 24 inches in height at the time of planting. 2. Where the PUD boundary abuts multi -family zoning, the required double hedgerow shall be a minimum of 36" in height at the time Of planting and shall achieve go% opacity within one year of planting. 3. Where the PUD boundary abuts single-family zoning, the required buffering shall be a minimum Type C buffer (with a six foot tall fence) as required by Section 2.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 4. Buffer areas shall not be required between planed lots or projects within the PUD or along the Santa Barbara Canal. 5. In order to emphasize the connection between the project and the surrounding community, pedestrian accesses will be provided from the rear of the project, where it directly abuts a public right- of-way. Access from sidewalks within the Golden Gate Parkway right-of-way shall also be provided for pedestrians. These accesses will be lighted and landscaped with a minimum of two shade trees and shall include a bench adjacent to each access. • One access shall be provided for every 300 feet of frontage along Golden Gate Parkway right-of-way. 6. Projects on lots within Tracts C, D, & B may relocate rear Pedestrian rest areas within that same tract, such as along the canal, as long as all of the required amenities are provided. L Signs: Signage shall be in accordance with Division 2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of final site development plan submittal or building permit application. J. Fast-food restaurants shall shield all ordering devices and/or windows where orders are taken from view from Golden Gate Parkway. K. Where this document does not address development standards, the standards found in the most similar zoning district in the Land Development Code shall apply. n LJ 16 SECTION V COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN FOR TRACT `F' 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify specific development standards for Tract `F' as identified on Exhibit A, PUD Master Plan. 5.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The area designated as Tract `F' on the PUD Master Plan is intended to provide professional offices and commercial land uses consistent with the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. This Tract totals +/- 2.97 of the +/-13.33 acres of the PUD and is located northwest of the intersection of the Golden Gate Parkway and the Santa Barbara Canal. The Tract lies within the Golden Gate Parkway Professional Office Commercial District. 5.3 PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitted principal uses and structures for Tract `F' as shown on Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan: 1. Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services (group 8721). 2. Business services (groups 7311, 7313, 7322-7331, 7335-7338, 7361, 7371, 7373-7376, 7379). 3. Depository institutions (groups 6021-6062). 4. Eating places [group 5812 (except carry -out restaurants; contract feeding; dinner theaters; drive-in and drive-through restaurants; fast food restaurants; food service, institutional; industrial feeding; pizzerias; restaurants, carry- out; restaurants, fast-food; submarine sandwich shops)]. 5. Engineering, architectural and surveying services (groups 8711- 8713). 6. Health services (groups 8011-8049). 7. Holding and other investment offices (groups 6712-6799). 8. Insurance carrier, agents and brokers (groups 6311-6399, 6411). 9. Legal services (group 8111). 10. Management and public relations services (groups 8741-8743, 8748). 11. Membership organizations (groups 8611, 8621). 12. Museums and art galleries (group 8412). 13. Non -depository credit institutions (groups 6141-6163). 14. Personal services (groups 7221, 7291). 15. Public administration (groups 9111-9199, 9229, 9311, 9411-9451, 9511- 9532, 9611-9661). 16. Real estate (groups 6512-6514, 6519, 6531-6553). 17. Research, development and testing services (group 8732). • 17 18. Security and commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges, and services (groups . 6211-6289). 19. Transportation services (group 4724). 20. Veterinary services (group 0742, excluding outside kenneling). 21. Any other commnercial use or professional service, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). B. Accessory Uses: Uses and structures that is accessory and incidental to the Permitted Uses within Tract "F" except for the overnight parking/storage of commercial vehicles. 5.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Minimum Lot Area: Twelve thousand (12,000) square feet. B. Minimum Lot Width: One hundred (100) feet. C. Minimum Yards (Setbacks): 1. Front yams along Golden Gate Parkway: Forty (40) feet. 2. Front yards along all other streets: Twenty-five (25) feet. 3. Side yards between development tracts: Ten (10) feet. 4. Side yard abutting the PUD perimeter. Fifteen (15) feet. 5. Rear yard: Twenty-five (25) feet. 6. Accessory Structures: Setbacks shall be as required by Division 2.6.2 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building • permit application, except small, architecturally designed canopies, intended to provide shelter from the sun and rain for pedestrians, shall only be required to be set back from the external boundaries of the PUD a distance of ten (10) feet. 7. Between Principal Structures: Fifteen (15) feet. D. Minimum floor area: 1,000 square feet for the principal structure for the first floor. E. Maximum Height: Twenty-five (25) feet for the principal structures plus 10 feet for Parking areas beneath the principal structures. F. Off-street Parking and Loading: 1. As required by Division 2.3 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. 2. Each phase of development shall provide the minimum required amount of parking as required by Section 2.3 of the Land Development Code. n L. J G. Open Space Requirements: A minimum of thirty (30) percent open space, as described in Section 2.2.20.3.5 of the Land Development Code, shall be maintained for the developed parcels of land within the PUD. The petitioner shall submit data at the time of each site development plan application that the subject parcel has a minimum of thirty (30) percent open space or that the subject parcel measured cumulatively with all previously developed parcels within the PUD will total a minimum of thirty (30) percent open space of the cumulative area. 18 • H. Landscaping and Buffering Requirements: 1. A ten -foot wide buffer "Y" shall be constructed around the perimeter of Tract "F', excluding driveways, sidewalks and alley access drives that serve the project. Such Buffer "Y" shall require one shade tree per twenty (20) linear feet and a double hedgerow along the perimeter of Tract 'T". Hedges shall be a minimum of 24 inches at the time of planting. 2. Where the PUD boundary abuts multi -family zoning, the required double hedgerow shall be a minimum of 36" inches in height at the time of planting and shall achieve 80% opacity within one year of planting. 3. In order to emphasize the connection between the project and the surrounding community, pedestrian accesses will be provided from the rear of the project, where it directly abuts a public right- of -way. Access from the sidewalks within the Golden Gate Parkway right-of-way shall also be provided for pedestrians. These accesses will be lighted and landscaped with a minimum of two shade trees and shall include a bench adjacent to each access. One access shall be provided for every 300 feet of project frontage along Golden Gate Parkway. I. Signs: Signage shall be in accordance with Division 2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of final site development plan submittal or building permit application. 0 J. Where this Document does not address development standards, the standards found in the most similar zoning district in the Land Development Code shall apply. • 19 0 SECTION VI DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 6.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for the development of this project. 6.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with final site development plans, final subdivision plans and all State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this PUD, in effect at the time of building permit application. Except as herein specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the official County Land Development Code shall apply to this project. The developer, his successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this Document. The developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the PUD Master Plan and the regulations of this PUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. Any successor or assignee in title is bound by the commitments within Us agreement. 6.3 PUD MASTER PLAN is A. Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed area, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as final Platting or site development plan approval. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code, amendments may be made from time to time. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project. 6.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONTTORING REPORT n LJ A site development plan shall be submitted per County regulations in effect at time of site plan submittal. The project is proposed to be completed in multiple phases. A. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the time limits pursuant to Section 2.7.3.4 of the Land Development Code. B. Monitoring Report: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Section 2.7.3.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 20 6.4 ENGINEERING . This project shall be required to meet all the requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code and any other applicable ordinance in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. 6.5 WATER MANAGEMENT This project shall be required to comply with the rules of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Chapters 40E-4 and 40E-40 and Collier County Ordinance No. 90-10. 6.6 UTILITIES Availability letters and construction plan approval from the applicable Florida government utility authority shall be provided prior to final subdivision plat or site development plan approval. 6.7 TRANSPORTATION A. The applicant shall install arterial level street lighting at each vehicular entrance along Golden Gate Parkway during construction of that project access unless these improvements are completed by Collier County as part of construction improvements to Golden Gate Parkway. B. Notwithstanding the existing roadway design of Golden Gate Parkway in the vicinity of this project, the County reserves the right of median access control. If the Collier County Transportation Department determines that operational problems require median modifications, the operation of this PUD rezoning shall not vest any right to the project owner that would prevent the County from modifying any median openings, including directional changes and possible future closure. C. All commercial accesses from Golden Gate Parkway shall provide right turn lanes into the development consistent with Collier County Ordinance 93-64, Work Within the Right -of -Way. D. The Collier County Transportation Department shall approve the final design parameters of any curb radius of all access points at the time of site development plan (SDP) approval. E. There shall be no direct vehicular access to 52nd Street Southwest, 53rd Terrace Southwest, 29'h Place Southwest, or 27`h Place Southwest. Vehicular access to 53`d Street southwest may be allowed for limited turning movements. This access is subject to the review and approval of the Transportation Department at the time of site development plan approval. F. A cross -access agreement between the owners of the subject PUD and the adjoining property to the west, Parkway Promenade PUD, shall be recorded in the Collier County Public Records prior to final site development plan approval. A westbound right turn Iane shall be constructed at their common entrance to serve both of these projects. Prior to the first site development plan approval within Tract "C" the developer shall dedicate compensating right-of-way to the County for the use as a . 21 • right -of --way for the tum lane and relocation of the sidewalk. This compensation shall not be subject to impact fee credits and shall be in place before any certificates of occupancy are issued. G. The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward a traffic signal system, if and when such signal system is wan -anted, at any project entrance. The County shall solely determine warrants for the installation of a signal system. The County shall own, operate and maintain any such signal system. IL Impact fees shall be paid in accordance with the Collier County Impact Fee Ordinance in effect at the time such fees are due and payable to the County. I. The petitioner may construct a new pedestrian bridge or bridges across the Santa Barbara Canal. The petitioner shall pay the fair share cost for the construction of the pedestrian bridges. The fair share cost shall be the fair market value of the right-of- way and/or access easements for the bridges. One bridge would generally be located north of Golden Gate Parkway and the other south of Golden Gate Parkway. The exact location of the bridges shall be determined at the time of site development plan approval. J. The median opening west of the Santa Barbara Canal on Golden Gate Parkway shall be modified from the existing full opening to a directional opening and subject to the Transportation Department approval. 6.8 PLANNING A. All buildings shall provide a common architectural theme incorporating architecture • and project signage consistent with Section 2.8 of the Land Development Code (LDC). During the site development plan review process, the developer shall provide architectural drawings indicating that all proposed buildings will have a common architectural theme and similar architectural style for parcels that are immediately adjacent to each other. These buildings shall utilize stucco walls (except for decorative trim), pastel colors and tike roofs as defined in Section 2.8 of the Land Development Code. Decorative parapet walls may be constructed above the motline if it is determined to be consistent with Section 2.8 of the LDC at the time of site development plan review. B. Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. C. The overnight parking of commercial vehicles with a rated load capacity of one ton is prohibited on Tracts C, D, and E. The number of commercial vehicles parked overnight shall not exceed 30 percent or the required parking spaces for each use as required in Section 2.3.16 of the Collier County Land Development Code. n 22 FOUNDERS PLAZA PUD AU87ER PLAN Land Use Table Hulldln/ Area 3.4 Acre (25941 Paved Area 9.0 Acre 145941 Green Area 3.93 Acres (30%1 Total Area: 18.33 Acre tl0D%J tai—wasyr s— • All access points and median openings that are depicted on the Master Plan are conceptual in nature. The Transportation Department shall approve the final access points into the project and the median design at the time of site development plan approval. • Prepared for. Perk East pe„elOPment. Ltd. 5395 Park Central Court Naples. FL 34109 J*-wv 24. aool 40109-2 • STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of: ORDINANCE 2002-68 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 17th day of December, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of • County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 19th day of December, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex -officio to Board of County Commissioners a o .._ � A A By: