The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 07/11/2017 Item #16B107/11/2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) as the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) approve an After-The-Fact U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application submittal to fund the Immokalee Sidewalk Improvements Program within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area, totaling $250,000. OBJECTIVE: To receive grant funding to support redevelopment activities within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area. CONSIDERATIONS: The Immokalee CRA responded to a grant announcement from the Collier County Community and Human Service Division (CHS) for the FY2017 -2018 HUD funding cycle. The following is a brief description the application submitted: The application covers the Immokalee Sidewalk Improvements Program. The request for FY2017-2018 CDBG funds is $250,000 and will focus on covering the additional funds needed to cover the construction cost of the Immokalee Sidewalk/Streetscape Grant Program that was awarded $475,000 in FY2016-2017 CDBG funding cycle. The total cost of the project is $600,000. The CRA is requesting $125,000 additional funds to complete this project. The CRA is also requesting $125,000 to design additional sidewalks needed in various locations in Immokalee. Suggested areas considered are mostly on the south side of the Immokalee Area. The implementation of the additional sidewalk improvements will be done in two phases. Phase 1 will be Engineering Design and Phase 2 will be for Construction Services. This proposed new Immokalee Sidewalk Improvements Program defines the construction of sidewalks on existing streets throughout the Community. While streets built today are required to include sidewalks, many of the existing streets in Immokalee were built without sidewalks. The attached grant application was reviewed and approved by the County Manager after the submittal due date. The application was due to CHS by the March 1, 2017 application deadline. The timeline did not provide adequate time for the execution of the County’s pre-approval process. Collier County CMA#5330 authorizes the County Manager to approve the submittal of grant applications with subsequent Community Redevelopment Agency action at the next available board meeting to ratify the approval as “After-The - Fact.” FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact as this request is for approval to submit the grant application to CHS. If awarded, a grant agreement and necessary budget amendments will be brought to the BCC as the CRA for approval at a future meeting. CONSISTENCY WITH GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN: Approval of this item is in accordance with the current Growth Management Plan standards for redevelopment in the Community. ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION: By consensus, during the regular meeting of the Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board on February 15, 2017, the Advisory Board agreed to respond to a grant announcement from the Collier County Community and Human Service Division (CHS) for the FY2017 -2018 HUD funding cycle. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney, is approved as to form and legality, and requires majority vote for approval. -JAK 07/11/2017 RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) as the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) approve an After-The-Fact HUD CDBG application submittal to fund the Immokalee Sidewalk Improvements Program within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area, totaling $250,000. Prepared By: Christie Betancourt, CRA Interim Operations Manager ATTACHMENT(S) 1. CM MEMO 2017 06-22 CDBG Immokalee Sidewalk Improvements (PDF) 2. APP 2017 06-27 CHS CDBG IMM Sidewalk (PDF) 07/11/2017 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 16.B.1 Doc ID: 3317 Item Summary: Recommendation that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) as the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) approve an After -The-Fact U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) applicati on submittal to fund the Immokalee Sidewalk Improvements Program within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area, totaling $250,000. Meeting Date: 07/11/2017 Prepared by: Title: Administrative Assistant – Immokalee CRA Name: Christie Betancourt 06/14/2017 9:10 AM Submitted by: Title: Executive Manager of Corp Business Ops – County Manager's Office Name: Tim Durham 06/14/2017 9:10 AM Approved By: Review: Grants Edmond Kushi Level 2 Grants Review Completed 06/19/2017 9:49 AM County Manager's Office Tim Durham Additional Reviewer Completed 06/19/2017 6:20 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 06/20/2017 7:35 AM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 06/20/2017 8:05 AM Budget and Management Office Ed Finn Additional Reviewer Completed 06/20/2017 4:39 PM Grants Therese Stanley Additional Reviewer Completed 06/27/2017 12:05 PM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 07/02/2017 12:49 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 07/11/2017 9:00 AM 8288-Z9Z'6'Z XVI .81.68-Z9Z-6\Z,9tLg-ZllW epDoE ',satdeN . L0Z oInS'lsPf trP.r1 ruErurel66Zt 'lsanba.r srql 8ulprp8al suo!]sanb Aue a^eq no^l /v\oul auJ lal aspald pue 'no^ lueql dn llrd JoJ 8618-Z5Z-6€Z le aur llel aseald'uorlelrldde lusrE aql pa^rar^ar a^eq noA aluO 'Surlaau ))a Lloz'II Alnt aqr te srauo!ss!ururol i(1uno3 1o preog aqt Aq le^ordde lleJ aql raue Aq pa/$olloJ leururqns rol uorlecr;dde aq1 anordde:a8eueyl A1uno3 aq1 1eq1 8ullsanbal eJe a/v\'punoJeuJnl uoqs aql ol ano'tloz /I qrren ]o alPp anp P ql!/vl LIoz'tI fuenuet uo pafunouue sem Alrunpoddo Surpunl aqt 'uorlefrldde luer8 srqljo1 luaua:1nbal q3le[! ou st alaql 'aelqouul lo &!:r aql lnoq6nortll slaerls burlsrxa uo qleMapls pnrlsuo) ol luauanordtul qleMaprs aoleloutxl aql roJ uorsr^O saltruas ueunH pue Arunuiuof, A1uno3 rar;;o3 aql ol uoqelrldde ggql 1IOZ e 6ul11lulqns st Wf aele>loruul aq1 LI1Z t ZZ aunt 000'0SZS Jo lunotup aql u! stuaua^orduil sllemaprs aalelourr.lrl aql io] SHf l1uno3 rarglo3 ol uorlelrlddV (9gOl) lueJg IlolE luatudolana6 A11unu:u.ro3 LIOZ e p le^oJdde pue /v\a!^al .ra8eue6l A1uno3 H(luelunoffv roruas 'rqsn) puorupl :tAoul VUI aalelour.rjl-]a8eue61 suolleradO uualul 'UnoJuelag V arlsrJql :ll Ja8euen ll,unof 'rf 'sLllO I oal :01 loopng t lueuooeuef! ]o mUO :lu turlaau f)g lloz 'II llnt aql le parnbal sl :|lg aql lq le^oJddv pel-aql-rauv Alunol Aq pe^orddV pue pa/(ar^au uorlelrlddV luerg unol u raBeu uBrsap ro frlttuoc*gu- Powered by ZoomGrants™ Email This Preview Save as PDF Print Close Window A▲▼ Collier County Community and Human Services Community and Human Services 2017 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 3/1/2017 deadline Immokalee CRA Immokalee Sidewalk Improvements $ 250,000.00 Requested $ 850,000 Total Project Cost Submitted: 3/1/2017 1:41:28 PM (Pacific) Project Contact Christie Betancourt christiebetancourt@colliergov.net Tel: 239-867-0028 Additional Contacts christiebetancourt@colliergov.net,JoshuaThomas@colliergov.net Immokalee CRA 750 South 5th Street Immokalee, FL 34142 County Manager Leo E Ochs Jr leoochs@colliergov.net Telephone239-867-0028 Fax Web www.immokaleetoday.com Agency Information Section 3: AGENCY ORGANIZATION INFORMATION 1. Is your organization a non-profit with 501(c)(3) status? 2. How many years have you been in operation? 3. Is your organization or agency faith based? If yes, all faith-based organizations must complete and attach Acknowledgement of Religious Organization Requirements Form (in the Documents tab) 4. Does your agency have written personnel, fiscal/procurement & implemented policy? (Community and Human Services will review upon award) 5. Does your agency have a written operating procedures manual? (Community and Human Services will review upon award) 6. Physical Address (if different from mailing address listed in previous tab) If the mailing and physical address are the same, enter 'Same'. -no answer- ✔✔✔✔ Yes gfedc No 17 Years 17.0017.00 TOTAL gfedc Yes ✔✔✔✔ No ✔✔✔✔ Yes gfedc No ✔✔✔✔ Yes gfedc No Application Questions Section 4: NATIONAL OBJECTIVES 1. Which one of the three National Objectives will this project target? For additional information, click the Application Guide tab, above. 2. Provide justification for how your project targets the National Objective selected above. Refer to the Application Guide tab, above, for specific subcategories to address. This project will provide public facilities and improvements to the local schools, non-profits, and the residential and commercial areas in various locations in Immokalee. The Low Moderate Income designation is illustrated using HUD Low Income Census Tract map, Exhibit 18 LMA Collier County Maps FY 2015 and Exhibit 20 Immokalee Area Census Map. Section 5: INDICATOR ACTIVITY CODE (HUD MATRIX CODES) 3. Which HUD Activity Code best reflects this proposed project? Refer to the HUD Activity Codes document in the Library tab for a list of codes. If your project reflects more than 1 matrix code, you must submit multiple applications. (Click the Open Programs tab, above, to create an additional application.) Section 6: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND GOALS 4. Concise Project Description and Goals Narrative (placing emphasis in THIS project application) Refer to Applicant Guide tab for specific instructions. The Collier County Board of County Commissioner, on behalf of Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA), is seeking funding assistance to complete the construction of the Immokalee Sidewalk/Streetscape Grant program that was awarded $475,000 in 2016. The total cost of the Project is $600,000. We are requesting $125,000 additional funds to complete this project. We are also requesting $125,000 to design sidewalks needed in various locations in Immokalee. Immokalee is a walking community where walking should be a safe and convenient mode of transportation and recreation. In order to promote greater walking and cycling activities, the CRA and MSTU are requesting funds to construct sidewalks in locations where the highest concentrations of pedestrians exists and where the lack of a sidewalks poses the greatest threat to the pedestrian. This proposed new Immokalee Sidewalk Improvements Program defines the construction of sidewalks on existing streets throughout the Community. While streets built today are required to include sidewalks, many of the existing streets in Immokalee were built without sidewalks. The implementation of the Immokalee Sidewalk Improvements program will be done in two phases. Phase 1 will be Engineering Design and Phase 2 will be for Construction Services. Suggested Areas considered of most need are mostly in the south side of Immokalee. 1. Carver Street 2. Delaware Avenue 3. South Ninth Street 4. North Ninth Street 5. Eustis Avenue 6. Palmetto Avenue Most sidewalks were selected by the CRA and MSTU 2016 Goals and Action Plans of the Advisory Committees. (Exhibit 19) This implementation could also include the removal and replacement of existing deteriorating and/or unsafe features from within the County right-of-way. The Program will be consistent with three previous related studies/reports entitled (Exhibit 22) Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements Study, and The Immokalee CRA Public Realm Plan/Town Design (Exhibit 23) which were prepared by professional consultancy firms with the assistance of the CRA and MSTU citizen advisory committees. The proposed construction project was designed using MSTU funds and is proposed to be constructed by September 30, 2017 using the awarded CDBG grant funds. The Project will improve pedestrian and vehicular safety, provide aesthetics to create a unified community character, and improve the visibility and economic viability of existing and future businesses in the downtown area and several other areas of Immokalee. Collier County Transportation Operations department, in conjunction with a citizen’s focus group, as opposed to a single thought, was tasked to study and identify the possible underlying causes for the high accident and crime rate. The task force identified a concern with lack of sidewalks, obstructed intersection sight lines, not enough light and limited pedestrian visibility. Goals: Promote and improve walking as a safe and inviting mode of travel through a comprehensive walking program of pedestrian facilities. Vision: • Increase the safety of commuters walking or using transit to get to work. • Increase the safety of students walking to school or riding the bus. • Increase transit use in the community. • Foster strong public awareness about the rights and responsibilities of pedestrians. • Support walking as a recreational activity. ✔✔✔✔ Benefits low and moderate income persons (24 CFR 570.208(a)) gfedc Aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight (24 CF 570.208(b)) gfedc Qualifies as a certified urgent need (24 CF 570.208(c)) 03L Activity Code 0.000.00 TOTAL See (Exhibit 21): Map of Various Immokalee Designations for study area boundary (Community Redevelopment Area). Section 7: IMPACT ON COLLIER COUNTY’S PRIORITY NEEDS NOTED IN THE APPLICANT GUIDE 5. Impact on Collier County's Priority Needs Noted in the Applicant Guide Narrative Refer to Applicant Guide tab for specific instructions. Level of local support and community involvement: The Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA), the Immokalee Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU), the Collier County Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement Division (PTNE), and Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) have a several areas in Immokalee they would like to construct sidewalks on. This proposed Project will be used to update the Immokalee CRA & MSTU Annual Goals. The plan will be used to identify the areas that will no longer need sidewalk/streetscape improvements using CDBG funding. The Immokalee community area is designated a Rural Area of Opportunity (RAO). The benefits of being a designated RAO is that communities are given extra points on grants, they are eligible to receive waivers or reduction of match, they are priority assignments for REDI as well as to allow the Governor, acting through REDI, to waive criteria, requirements, or similar provisions of any economic development incentive. Incentives include, but are not limited to, the Qualified Target Industry Tax Refund Program, Quick Response Training Program, and Quick Response Training Program for participants in the welfare transition program, transportation projects, Brownfield redevelopment bonus refund, and the rural job tax credit program. The Immokalee community area is also designation a Promise Zone. The benefits of being a promises zone is that it partners the Federal government with local leaders who are addressing multiple community revitalization challenges in a collaborative way. Promise Zone Designees will receive: • Preferences for certain competitive federal grant programs and technical assistance from participating federal agencies; • A federal liaison assigned to help designees navigate federal programs; • An opportunity to engage AmeriCorps VISTA members in the Promise Zone’s work; and, • Promise Zone tax Incentives, if enacted by Congress. One of the study areas under consideration is Main Street (SR 29), a busy arterial corridor for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic within the Central Business District. State Route 29 provides access for tourists from State Route 27 to the north in Hendry County to South of Everglades City, south of US 41 (a.k.a. Tamiami Trail East), and terminating at Everglades Airport. The small section of SR 29 (Main Street) that passes through Immokalee provides the main access to, and the economical support of the downtown businesses and overall community. The Sidewalk/Streetscape program will greatly improve the functionality and aesthetics of the business district while improving the quality of life in Immokalee. Both the CRA and Immokalee Lighting/Beautification MSTU Advisory Committees have worked long and hard with Collier County Alternate Transportation Department and Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Board to ensure that these improvements be carried through to completion to serve the community interests as a whole. The design elements of the sidewalk projects in certain areas will include the removal of existing damaged and deteriorated site furnishings and replacement with new, updated furnishings to reflect the community’s culture. New litter receptacles will be located to provide convenience for litter disposal, new benches will provide enhanced seating opportunities and comfort for visitors and patrons while the conscious selection and strategic location of proposed plantings will define the limits of functional areas. The planned design, selection, and location of these elements in the streetscape will control pedestrian activities, buffer vehicular noise from sitting areas and store fronts, while enhancing views to businesses and screening undesirable views to mechanical and utilities equipment. The existing storm water system in the improvement areas will be enhanced with channel grate systems along the proposed sidewalks in order to provide ease of maintenance, eliminating the need to jet wash debris from the closed channel system, which will enhance overall visual aesthetics. This sidewalk project will reflect the Immokalee community’s desire to improve the Immokalee central business district. The community’s regional beautification plan for future improvements have been determined through a comprehensive study prepared by a team of professionals that include RWA Consulting Inc. and Land Design Innovations Incorporated, the results of the study are contained in the “Immokalee CRA Public Realm Plan/Town Design”, dated 2012, and winner of the 2010 Florida Planning and Zoning Association Award of Merit. The Immokalee Public Realm Plan/Town Design has been adopted by the local community via the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Board and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Additionally, this project is consistent with the “Immokalee Walkable Community Study” prepared for Collier County Metropolitan Planning Council, dated April 2010. Section 8: EXPERIENCE AND CAPACITY 6. Experience and Capacity Narrative Refer to Applicant Guide tab for specific instructions. The CRA team that will be managing this program consists of Terry Rosalez, Administrative Assistant, James Sainvilus, Project Manager and Christie Betancourt Operations Manager. Once the contract has been approved by the BCC, James Sainvilus will take over the role of Construction Manager. He will schedule the initial preconstruction meeting with all stakeholders. He will lay out the project schedule, Davis Bacon reporting requirements, scope of work, and any other pertinent information. As the project progresses, staff will be on site daily to ensure adherence to all safety codes and scope of work. He will keep a daily activity log complete with pictures. Mr. Sainvilus will review contractor invoices on a monthly basis before handing them over to Terry Rosalez for processing. The construction of this proposed sidewalk project will demonstrate through implementation that the community needs and goals have been heard by the governing bodies and action is being taken to invest in the Immokalee community. This sidewalk project will initiate the beginning of a renewed community pride through the development of comprehensive sidewalks in lieu of simple sidewalks. Other projects focused on the implementation of improvements to the Immokalee area have also recently been initiated for Immokalee’s future such as the completion of the First Street Zocalo Plaza at the intersection of Main Street and First Street. The Plaza worked towards the design and construction of a community plaza space as identified in the Immokalee Public Realm Plan. In 2014, the Immokalee CRA awarded two construction contracts related to the further implementation of the Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan construction began on March 2015 and was completed on August 2015. The Immokalee CRA staff completed the Immokalee Drive corridor in west Immokalee which was first identified as an area of concern by SWFL Water Management District in its original Immokalee Master Drainage Improvement Plan in 2005. Their concerns were based primarily on the nuisance flooding along the corridor in this densely populated residential area. This $2.5 million project addressed the concerns through the installation of a series of drainage structures connected via a piped conveyance system that meets current design standards. As a pedestrian safety measure, the scope also included the installation of concrete sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. The CRA also installed a comprehensive asphalt overlay, constructed new driveway aprons and replaced all effected right-of-way features. In 2011 the CRA invested $4 million dollars in improving the drainage conveyance systems in the Downtown District. The Colorado Avenue project consist of the CRA going back in to this project area to install additional drainage structures and pipe along Colorado Avenue to further improve the hydrology of the area. Although this project addresses drainage issues, of equal importance is the pedestrian safety improvement component of the project. The Colorado Avenue corridor from South First to South Ninth Streets consists of drainage ditches in some areas which force pedestrians and vehicles to share the roadway. The project included concrete sidewalks, grading & new sod on both sides of Colorado Avenue from South First to South Ninth Streets in the densely populated downtown Immokalee area. Prior to installing the sidewalks, the CRA filled the open drainage ditches with concrete drainage pipe and fill dirt in order to create a level area for the sidewalks along the roadway. Colorado Avenue is the primary pedestrian access facility for families accessing both Pinecrest Elementary School and the Immokalee Daycare Center. In an area where families generally escort their young children to and from school, the sidewalks were vital to ensuring pedestrian safety. Prior to the project, families were forced to share the roadway with vehicles due to deep open drainage ditches along both sides of the roadway. The Immokalee CRA continues to work on projects – major and minor – to improve the physical surroundings of Immokalee and its quality of life. On August 13, 2013, the Immokalee CRA staff also completed a sidewalk project on Carson Rd, which is being used as a tool to estimate the project costs for this proposed program. Carson Road Sidewalk Improvement cost $175,000 for 0.5 mile of sidewalks, but did not include additional site features such as brick paver areas, benches or receptacles. On November 2012, the CRA staff completed a four million dollar grant funded storm water improvement project, and had replaced a blighted residential area with a functional and aesthetically pleasing drainage conveyance system complete with 7-acre pond site, roadway and sidewalk improvements. Last year CRA staff had recently completed the design and construction of the Immokalee Drive and Colorado Ave Stormwater and sidewalk improvement projects. Both projects cost about $1.9M. Immokalee is a community that has demonstrated a strong pride and desire for improvements and through the assistance of grant funding like this we can change dreams into reality and improve the quality of life in Immokalee Florida. 7. Have you received funding in the past? If so, please complete the Prior Awards table in the Tables tab. Section 9: ADDITIONAL PROJECT SPECIFIC INFORMATION 8. Additional Project Specific Information Narrative (include sources of estimates) Refer to the Applicant Guide tab for specific instructions. For the Immokalee Sidewalk/Streetscape Project the Immokalee CRA/MSTU used its own funds in order to expedite the design of the projects. We used the County Purchasing department guidelines to procure the services for Professional Engineering firm with a landscape architect. See Attached (Exhibit 24) Work Order/Purchase Order for Professional Engineering Design, Plans, Survey, and Permitting (EDPS & P) services for work known as Immokalee Sidewalk Improvements (Exhibit 25) & (Exhibit 26) For the new design of the Immokalee Sidewalk Improvements project we will are asking Currently, there is no sidewalk on this side of street, and pedestrians are forced to use the south roadway shoulder, discouraging and limiting safe movement. This road serves as a direct connection to a nearby school, residences, and some churches in the area. SCOPE OF SERVICES IMMOKALEE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS I. OVERVIEW The Immokalee CRA is seeking engineering design services for the construction of sidewalks along both sides of Eustis Ave, Carver Street, North Ninth, South Ninth, Palmetto Avenue and Delaware Street. II. Task Description A. Preliminary Design-60% 1. Attend project Kick-off meeting with Immokalee CRA/MSTU Staff. 2. Conduct site visit and perform engineering survey to aid in design, as follows: • Conduct site visit and perform a topographical survey along alignment of each location to aid in design. • Establish all necessary surveying controls (horizontal and vertical) and bench marks. • Establish a baseline of survey and set reference points. • Obtain full topography and develop a DTM. • Locate all drainage features (pipe sizes, inverts, manholes, inlets,etc.). • Locate existing above ground utilities within the project limits. • Locate property and section corners to establish and verify the ROW lines. 3. Prepare preliminary plans of the proposed improvements (60% submittal). Submit preliminary plans along with a preliminary cost estimate (60% submittal) to Immokalee CRA. All utility owners within the project limits will also be copied of this submittal for their review and comments 4. Attend 60% meeting with Immokalee CRA staff to review preliminary plans and comments provided by reviewers. 5. Contact Utility companies for existing utility information to be included in 60% plans. ✔✔✔✔ Yes AND the Prior Awards table is complete gfedc No 6. Contact jurisdictional regulatory agencies to determine permit requirements. B. Design and Permitting - 90% 1. Prepare plans (90%) incorporating utility information provided by the utility owners. 2. Submit plans along with cost estimate (90% submittal) to Immokalee MSTU. 3. Attend 90% meeting with Client to review complete plans and comments provided by reviewers. 4. Provide utility coordination for adjustment of utilities. 5. Prepare and submit permit packages determined to be required. The permit process includes responding to review comments, plan revisions, calculations and reports as may be required to obtain the permits. C. Final Design and Permitting-100% 1. Prepare complete plans (100%) incorporating utility information provided by the utility owners and comments from other County departments. 2. Submit complete plans along with cost estimate (100% submittal) to Immokalee CRA. 3. Prepare final plans, quantity take-off, bid schedule and Construction Specifications incorporating utility information provided by the utility owners or other reviewers. 4. Provide final utility coordination to be reflected in 100% plans. 5. Monitor and secure permits. III. PROJECT REQUIREMENTS A. Plan Preparation 1. Services to be provided will comply with procedures (Plan Preparation Manual), design standards, Florida Greenbook and construction specifications set by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices" (MUTCD), as updated to date. 2. Prepare plans utilizing Autodesk AutoCAD/Civil 3D, following the NCS "CAD Standards". B. Project Deliverables 1. One overall CAD file containing all of the survey points, line work, symbols, DTM and SUE information (where applicable). This file will be an AutoCAD Civil 3D file and will be directed by the Immokalee CRA. 2. One signed and sealed copy of the final plans by a Florida Professional Engineer. 3. Three copies of the various design stages of the project for internal review. Copies of the plans shall be submitted to the utility owners by the consultant as part of the utility coordination effort. 4. One electronic set of Construction Documents (including Plans, Specifications, Bid Schedule and other bid documents). 5. Copies of utility As-Built plans, Plats or ROW Maps obtained during the design phase of the project. The estimated Time and Material fee for the described services is about One Hundred and Twenty-Five Thousand dollars ($125,000). Section 10: ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 9. Put a check in any box that pertains to the proposed activity. If you check any of the boxes below (except 'None of the above'), you must provide an explanation in the next question. If you check the 'None of the above' box, you may enter 'N/A' in the next question. 10. If you checked any box (except 'None of the above') in the previous question, provide an explanation in the box below. If you checked 'None of the above' in the previous question, please enter 'N/A'. N/A Section 11: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND READINESS TO IMPLEMENT 11. Project Implementation Plan and Readiness to Implement Refer to Applicant Guide tab for specific instructions. The Immokalee CRA funds per Fiscal Year are at a minimum, covering only operational costs and are not enough for the Sidewalk Program. The CRA has recommended for annual CIP funding increases which is directly tied to limited local tax revenue, which is extremely low in Immokalee. An MSTU has been created but not enough has been generated for a program like this proposed sidewalk. If granted this grant then the general public in Immokalee will directly benefit from the sidewalk improvements. See CRA Year-to-Year Tax Increment Revenue. gfedc Project/property is located on an historical or archeological site gfedc Project/property is in the 100-year flood plain gfedc Project/property is in a wetlands area gfedc Project/property is in a coastal barrier area gfedc Project/property is within a half-mile of an airfield gfedc Project/property is near storage or manufacturing facility of industrial products gfedc Project/property is on or near soil contaminated by diesel/fuel or gasoline gfedc Project/property is expected to impact the environment in any negative manner or pose a hazard or nuisance gfedc Endangered or threatened or listed species are located on the proposed project site gfedc There are environmental concerns or impediments associated with the proposed activity (if yes, please provide detail) gfedc Project/property is expected to adversely affect the environment gfedc Project/property is NOT on a properly zoned site (if not zoned properly, please explain) ✔✔✔✔ None of the above 12. Please complete the Project Timeline table in the Tables tab, then check the box below to confirm. Timelines must be well thought out, complete, and achievable. Failure to provide adequate timelines may result in disqualification. Section 12: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 13. Financial Management Refer to the Applicant Guide tab for specific instructions. The Immokalee CRA funds per Fiscal Year are at a minimum, covering only operational costs and are not enough for the Sidewalk Program. The CRA has recommended for annual CIP funding increases which is directly tied to limited local tax revenue, which is extremely low in Immokalee. An MSTU has been created but not enough has been generated for a program like this proposed sidewalk. If granted this grant then the general public in Immokalee will directly benefit from the sidewalk improvements. See CRA Year-to-Year Tax Increment Revenue. 14. Please complete and upload the Financial Review Spreadsheet in the Documents tab. 15. Agency maintains the following records: Check all that apply. 16. Agency agrees to: Check all that apply. Section 13: OUTCOMES AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES 17. Outcomes and Performance Measures Refer to the Applicant Guide tab for specific instructions. As was previously explained, these improvements will meet many of the objectives identified in the CRA and MSTU Advisory Committee’s Annual Goals and Action/Operational Plans. • Provide a list of program/project outcomes Improved ascetic appeal of common areas in Immokalee. Increased pedestrian safety via the installation of sidewalks, removing pedestrians from the roadways. • Explain how the program/project demonstrates “value-added” or “community value” to Collier County A portion of the tax revenue that is generated within Immokalee is channeled into the CRA and MSTU funds, which are reinvested into the community via economic, infrastructure and ascetic improvement endeavors. unfortunately, there exists a severe gap between the taxable values and real-world market values of the properties throughout the community. This gap has created a financial hindrance on overall community improvements. The commercial common area improvements proposed within this application will support an increased assessment value of the properties within the community, generating an increased tax base that will ultimately be reinvested back into the community, creating a chain reaction of positive community growth. Section 14: BUDGET 18. Please complete the Budget Summary and Itemization table in the Tables tab, then check the box below to confirm. Section 15: ESTIMATED PROGRAM INCOME ✔✔✔✔ Project Timeline is complete ✔✔✔✔ Financial Review Spreadsheet is complete and uploaded ✔✔✔✔ Cash Receipts Journal ✔✔✔✔ Cash Disbursements Journal ✔✔✔✔ General Ledger ✔✔✔✔ Charts of Accounts ✔✔✔✔ Payroll Journal and Individual Payroll Records ✔✔✔✔ Individual Personnel Files ✔✔✔✔ Written Procurement Procedures ✔✔✔✔ Capital Inventory ✔✔✔✔ Written Travel Policy ✔✔✔✔ Property Control Policy and Records gfedc None of the above ✔✔✔✔ Submit complete audits for every year during contract ✔✔✔✔ Retaining all project records for the applicable time period as outlined in applicable regulations ✔✔✔✔ Budget Summary and Itemization table is complete 19. Will program income be generated as a result of the service or product provided? If so, please use the 'explain' box to indicate the SOURCE of the income generated (rent, proceeds, revenue, program fees, etc.) and the TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT that will be generated. 20. Estimated Program Income Narrative Refer to the Applicant Guide tab for specific instructions. If no program income will be generated, enter 'N/A'. N/A 21. If program income is anticipated, indicate how the funds will be utilized: Section 16: LEVERAGED OR MATCH FUNDS 22. If applicable, please complete the Leveraged or Match Funds table in the Tables tab, then confirm below. gfedc Yes, please explain: ✔✔✔✔ No gfedc Organization will track, re-use within the program and report to CHS on a monthly basis gfedc Organization will submit program income to CHS on a monthly (or at least yearly basis) ✔✔✔✔ N/A - No program income will be generated gfedc Leveraged or Match Funds table is complete ✔✔✔✔ N/A - No leveraged or matched funds exist Tables Prior Awards Fiscal Year Award Amount Clients Served Project Location FY 2010 - 2011 $ 3,500,000 Immokalee Area Immokalee Downtown District FY 2013 $ 2,011,955 Immokalee Area Immokalee Drive Area FY 2013 $ 517,300 Immokalee Area Colorado Avenue Area FY 2013 $ 994,000 Immokalee Area First Street & Main Street FY 2016 $ 475,000 Immokalee Area South 9th Street, Fifth Street, and Eustis Avenue FY $ FY $ FY $ FY $ FY $ FY $ Total $ 7,498,255 0 Project Timeline Tasks # of Days to Complete Date Completed/Anticipated Date (Month & Year)Responsible Party Environmental review for Immokalee Sidewalk/Streetscape Project 0 Days 2/2017 CHS Design/Conceptual Drawings for Immokalee Sidewalk/Streetscape Project 90 Days 6/2017 CRA Conditional Approval Letter 30 Days 4/2017 CHS Grant awarded to CRA 30 Days 9/2017 CHS Budget Amendment approved by BCC 30 Days 10/2017 CRA Revised Budget Approved by BCC 30 Days 11/2017 OMB Solicit for Construction for Immokalee Sidewalk/Streetscape Project 30 Days 12/2017 Purchasing Department and CRA GC contract to BCC 30 Days 1/2018 CRA Issue GC PO & NTP 60 Days 3/2018 CRA Anticpated start date for construction 0 Days 3/2018 Contractor and CRA Construction milestones 90 Days 6/2018 Contractor and CRA Construction schedule 30 Days 7/2018 Contractor and CRA Construction complete 30 Days 8/2018 Contractor and CRA Environmental review for new sidewalk locations 60 Days 4/2017 CHS Solicit for Design and Engineerng 30 Days 12/2017 Purchasing Department and CRA Contract for Professional Services to BCC 30 Days 1/2018 CRA Issue PO & NTP 60 Days 3/2018 CRA Design Milestones 120 Days 6/2018 Contractor and CRA Design Schedule 30 Days 7/2018 Contractor and CRA Design 100% Complet 30 Days 8/2018 Contractor and CRA Grant Audit 30 Days 8/2018 CHS Grant Closeout 30 Days 9/2018 CHS Days Days Total 900 Days Budget Summary and Itemization Project Components - Detail/Itemization by Line Item CDBG Funding Other Funds Leverage/Match Total Narrative Deliverable Construction of Immokalee Sidewalk/Streetscape $ 125,000 $ 79,814 $ $ Final County acceptance of newly constructed sidewalks within the county right-of-way Design of Immokalee Sidewalks/pedestrian facilities $ 125,000 $ $ $ 100% Construction Design Plans $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total $ 250,000 $ 79,814 $ 0 $0 Leveraged or Match Funds Source of Match/Leveraged Funds Conditions/Limitations of Match/Leverage Funds Amount $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total $ 0 Documents Documents Requested *Required?Attached Documents * 501(c)(3) IRS Tax Exemption Letter ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 1 501(c)(3) Articles of Incorporation ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 2 Articles of Incorporation By-Laws ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 3 CRA Bylaws Organizational Chart ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 4 Org Chart 2 List of Board of Directors ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 5 Board of Directors Resumes, Pay Scales with Job Descriptions ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 6 Staff Resume and Job Description State of Florida Certificate of Good Standing ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 7 State of Florida Certificate of Good Standing Board Resolution authorizing submittal of grant application ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 8 Board Resolution Preceding 2-year completed audits including management letter and findings ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 9 County Financial Statement Acknowledgement Letter download template ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 10 Acknowledgement Letter Affidavit of Compliance with Federal, State, and Local Regulations download template ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 11 Affidavit of Compliance Certification of CDBG Funded Construction/Rehabilitation Projects download template Exhibit 12 Certificate of CDBG Construction Rehab Acknowledgment of Religious Organization Requirements (template?) download template Exhibit 13 Acknowledgement of Religious Organization Requirements Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility Voluntary Exclusion download template ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 14 Certificate Regarding Debarment Procurement Policy ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 15 Purchasing Policy Match Documentation Internal Revenue Service Form 990 - First 12 page of the last 2 years ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 17 Internal Revenue Services Form IF APPLICABLE: Verification of site plan/plat approval IF APPLICABLE: Verification of zoning IF APPLICABLE: Location map/photo of site Exhibit 18 LMA Collier County FY 2015 MAP Exhibit 20 Immokalee Area Census Map Exhibit 21 Immokalee Boundary Areas IF APPLICABLE: Floor plans IF APPLICABLE: Relocation plan associated with Uniform Relocation regulations Financial Review Spreadsheet download template ✔✔✔✔ Exhibit 16 Financial Spreadsheet Additional documents, if needed Exhibit 19 Annual Goals - Action and Operational Plan Results Exhibit 22 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvement Study Exhibit 23 Immokalee CBD Public Realm Plan Exhibit 24 Proposal and Backup documents Exhibit 25 Cost Estimates Exhibit 26 Immokalee Sidewalk Plans Application ID: 75872 Become a fan of ZoomGrants™ on Facebook Problems? Contact us at Questions@ZoomGrants.com ©2002-2017 GrantAnalyst.com. All rights reserved. "ZoomGrants" and the ZoomGrants logo are trademarks of GrantAnalyst.com, LLC. Logout | Browser * ZoomGrants™ is not responsible for the content of uploaded documents. Exhibit 27 CRA 2016 Annual Report Draft N/A Exhibit 1. 501(c)(3) IRS Tax Exemption Letter Resolution No. 2000-83 Exhibit 2 Articles of Incorporation County Manager Immokalee CRA Operations Manager Project Manager Administrative Assistant Exhibit 4 Organizational Chart Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency Organizational Chart Collier County CRA/BCC Although the Collier County Board of County Commissioners sits as t he Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors, the CRA Board is a separate and distinct legal entity. Exhibit 5 List of Board of Directors Exhibit 7 State of Florida Certificate of Good Standing N/A Exhibit 8 Board Resolution Authorizing Submittal of Grant Application N/A Exhibit 9-Audited Financial Statement Collier County’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports for the year 2014 and 2015 can be found on the following link: https://www.collierclerk.com/clerk-to-the-board/finance/finance-and-investment- reports/comprehensive-annual-financial-reports-cafr al]!J- pue auleN ie;euel^l AlunoJ - rt sr.llo 'l oal aArlelu U AruaBV lo aJ nleuSrs ,41 aralu!s 'A]!roqlne qlns SurAJua^ uorleluaurnrop lruqns ol luelrldde aqt arnbar Aeu pue (uorlezrue8Jo aql lo ]leqaq uo) luellddv aql purq ol pazuoqlne s! a^oqe arnleu8rs pazuoqlne aql leql Ajlra^ ol tr.l8u aql saruasar Alunof aqf suolleuluralap Surpunl leuu o1 loud palsanbar aq AeLr sluauiqsrldruolfe pasodoid pue lJo/ll ]o adoJs '1a3pnq paslnar e Surpn;:ur uolleluaunf,op leuorllppe 'roJ parldde lunoue lln] aql ueql ssal ro] apeur sr uorlepuauuofar Surpun,r e ]r teql sa8pal/vroulle os;e luerr;ddy 'luatua8eueu lellueuU pue luaurarnrord Sulpnllur 'stuauaJrnbar lelol pue alets'lerapa] alqe:r1dde leuorlrppe lle ql!i\^ Alduol ol alqe aq llm puesuorlerurual asoql lo suorsrnord aql qllm Alln] Ald uror ol alqe aq llus luelrlddv aql 'alqelrldde se 'spun} papre/lle ,r 'pue olaraq paqleDe suoller!]rual aql spuetsrapun pue pear seq aqs/aq leql sa8palmoulle pau8rsrapun aql '/nolaq Suru8rs i{g 'slleJ leualeur Aue ol se Alunof aql pealsltri ro luasardaJsru.r 'ped u1 .ro aloq/n ur 'lou op ularaql sluauralels aql arnsua ol fuessalau uorleur.rolur lle sapnllur uorlelrldde srql alaldurol pue alernlle 'anJt a.re A1uno3 aql ol paJa^rlap 'sluaunlop Jaqlo pue salnpaqrs'slrqrqxa Surpnllur 'JoaJaql ped Aue ro lesodoJd slql u! pau!etuol uorletlJolur aq1'uraJaql passaJdxa suorl!puof, pue'suollel!u.rl lullads 'sural aql tdalle pue o] aar3e | 'srauo rsslu] ur oJ Atunof lo preo8 Alunof larllol roJ fuoleu8qs pazuoqlne Alnp aql se 'rauorssr.! u.rof Alunol ]o preog A1uno3 rar;lol aql lo Jleqaq uO 'Surpunl OnH 9IOZ- LIOZlg lo; uorlecr;dde (SHl) salrruas uetunH pue Atrunuuol Aluno3 lar11o3 aqt peal a^eq I :aalllur.l]oJ ^ ar^au pue Surlueu aqt lo sraqurau pue lueJg 'st Jeao alcA3 uorle:rlddy luerg 8I0Z-ZI0ZAl aql rapun Surpunl roj ]sanbau :lU LIOZ 'I \vet 'lsrllJaql aql SurrnolloJ laIJed uoltel!ldde aql ]o Z a8ed aq llrM srt{l 'peaqJa11al s.uollezgue8lo aqt uo leuluqns aql Jaue uollPllldde lueiS aqt u! la$al s!ql alelodjo:u1 lleqs sluellldde llv USJJS'I JN!WS 3C3'IMONX]V 0 t llqlqxq 71179 11 'sa1de1 IIZ allns'lrerl rueruel 'l 6€€g safrruas uetxnH pue Alrunururol Alunol Jalllol Jollarlo'luel9 Aallaqull)'st^ ATTESTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS FOR ALL APPLICATIONS AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL REGULATIONS The undersigned certifies that the information in this application is true and correct. The undersigned further certifies that they are aware that if Collier County CHS finds that the applicant or undersigned has engaged in fraudulent actions or i ntentionally misrepresented facts on this application, this application will be rejected and the applicant may be unable to participate in any program for three (3) fiscal years. In applying for CDBG/HOME/ESG funds, the applicant has read, understands and agrees to comply with all the provisions of all federal regulations issued thereto by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, state and local regulations and laws. 1. 24 CFR 570, as amended - The regulations governing the expenditure of Commun ity Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. 2. 24 CFR 58 - The regulations prescribing the Environmental Review procedure. 3. Section 104(b) and Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 as amended 4. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 as amended 5. 24 CFR 570.601 Subpart K - The regulations issued pursuant to Executive Order 11063 which prohibits discrimination and promotes equal opportunity in housing. 6. Executive Order 11246 (“Equal Employment Opportunity”), as amended by Executive Orders 11375 and 12086 - which establishes hiring goals for minorities and women on projects assisted with federal funds and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations. 7. Title VII of the 1968 Civil Rights Act as amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, 42 USC § 2000e, et. seq. The SUBRECIPIENT will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the SUBRECIPIENT, state that it is an Equal Opportunity or Affirmative Action employer. 8. 24 CFR 135 – Regulations outlining requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended. Compliance with the provisions of Section 3 of the HUD Act of 1968, as amended, and as implemented by the regulations set forth in 24 CFR 135, and all applicable rules and orders issued hereunder prior to the execution of this contract, shall be a condition of the Federal financial assistance provided under this contract and binding upon the COUNTY, the SUBRECIPIENT and any of the SUBRECIPIENT’s Sub-recipients and subcontractors. Failure to fulfill these requirements shall subject the COUNTY, the SUBRECIPIENT and any of the SUBRECIPIENT’s Sub-recipients and subcontractors, their successors and assigns, to those sanctions specified by the Agreement through which Federal assistance is provided. The SUBRECIPIENT certifies and agrees that no contractual or other disability exists that would prevent compliance with these requirements. The SUBRECIPIENT further agrees to comply with these “Section 3” requirements and to include the following language in all subcontracts executed under this Agreement: “The work to be performed under this Agreement is a project assisted under a program providing direct Federal financial assistance from HUD and is subject to the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1701). Section 3 requires that to the greatest extent feasible opportunities for training and employment be given to low- and very low-income residents of the project area, and that contracts for work in connection with the project be awarded to business concerns that provide economic opportunities for low- and very low-income persons residing in the metropolitan area in which the project is located.” The SUBRECIPIENT further agrees to ensure that opportunities for training and employment arising in connection with a housing rehabilitation (including reduction and abatement of lead-based paint hazards), housing construction, or other public construction project are given to low- and very low-income persons residing within the metropolitan area in which the CDBG-funded project is located; where feasible, priority should be given to low- and very low-income persons within the service area of the project or the neighborhood in which the project is located, and to low - and very low- income participants in other HUD programs; and award contracts for work undertaken in connection with a housing rehabilitation (including reduction and abatement of lead- based paint hazards), housing construction, or other public construction project to business concerns that provide economic opportunities for low - and very low-income persons residing within the metropolitan area in which the CDBG-funded project is located; where feasible, priority should be given to business concerns that provide economic opportunities to low- and very low-income residents within the service area or the neighborhood in which the project is loc ated, and to low- and very low-income participants in other HUD programs. The SUBRECIPIENT certifies and agrees that no contractual or other legal incapacity exists that would prevent compliance with these requirements. 9. Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Executive Order 11063, and Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Orders 11375, 11478, 12107 and 12086. 10. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, 40 USC 327-332. 11. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 USC 776(b) (5), 24 CFR 570.614 Subpart K. 12. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 13. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended. 14. 29 CFR Parts 3 and 5 - Regulations which prescribe the payment of prevailing wages and the use of apprentices and trainees on federally assisted projects as mandated by the Davis- Bacon Act. HUD Form 4010 must be included in all construction contracts funded by CDBG. (See 42 USC 276a and 24 CFR 135.11(c)). 15. Executive Order 11914 - Prohibits discrimination with respect to the handicapped in federally assisted projects. 16. Executive Order 11625 and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Circular Letter 79-45 - which prescribes goal percentages for participation of minority businesses in Community Development Block Grant Contracts. 17. The SUBRECIPIENT agrees to comply with the non -discrimination in employment and contracting opportunities laws, regulations, and executive orders referenced in 24 CFR 570.607, as revised by Executive Order 13279. The applicable non-discrimination provisions in Section 109 of the HCDA are still applicable. 18. Public Law 100-430 - the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988. 19. 24 CFR 84 - Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations. 20. 24 CFR 85 - Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State, Local, and Federally recognized Indian Tribal Governments shall be followed for sub recipients that are governmental entities. 21. Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 USC 1324, et seq. and regulations relating thereto. Failure by the SUBRECIPIENT to comply with the laws referenced herein shall constitute a breach of this agreement, and the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate this agreement immediately. 22. Prohibition Of Gifts To County Employees - No organization or individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee, service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112, Part III, Florida Statutes, Collier County Ethics Ordinance No. 2004-05, as amended, and County Administrative Procedure 5311. 23. Order of Precedence - In the event of any conflict between or among the terms of any of the Contract Documents, the terms of the Agreement shall take precedence over the terms of all other Contract Documents, except the terms of any Supplemental Conditions shall take precedence over the Agreement. To the extent any conflict in the terms of the Contract Documents cannot be resolved by application of the Supplemental Conditions, if any, or the Agreement, the conflict shall be resolved by imposing the more strict or costly obligation under the Contract Documents upon the Contractor at Owner’s discretion. 24. Dispute Resolution - Prior to the initiation of any action or proceeding permitted by this Agreement to resolve disputes between the parties, the parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve any such disputes by negotiation. Any situations when negotiations, litigation and/or mediation shall be attended by representatives of SUBRECIPIENT with full decision-making authority and by COUNTY’S staff person who would make the presentation of any settlement reached during negotiations to COUNTY for approval. Failing resolution, and prior to the commencement of depositions in any litigation between the parties arising out of this Agreement, the parties shall attempt to resolve the dispute through Mediation before an agreed-upon Circuit Court Mediator certified by the State of Florida. Should either party fail to submit to mediation as required hereunder, the other party may obtain a court order requiring mediation under § 44.102, Florida Statutes. The litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be Collier County, Florida, if in state court and the US District Court, 20th Judicial Court of Florida, if in federal court. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT , COLLIER COUNTY AND THE SUBRECIPIENT EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO, OR ARISING OUT OF, THIS AGREEMENT. 25. The SUBRECIPIENT agrees to comply with the following requirements: a. Clean Air Act, 41 USC 7401, et seq. b. Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 USC 1251, et seq., as amended. 26. In accordance with the requirements of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 USC 4002 and 24 CFR 570.605 Subpart K), the SUBRECIPIENT shall assure that for activities located in an area identified by FEMA as having special flood hazards, flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program is obtained and maintained. If appropriate, a letter of map amendment (LOMA) may be obtained from FEMA, which would satisfy this requirement and/or reduce the cost of said flood insurance. 27. The SUBRECIPIENT agrees that any construction or rehabilitation of residential structures with assistance provided under this contract shall be subject to HUD Lead -Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act found at 24 CFR 570.608, Subpart K. 28. The SUBRECIPIENT agrees to comply with the Historic Preservation requirements set forth in the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470) and the procedures set forth in 36 CFR Part 800, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Procedures for Protection of Historic Properties, insofar as they apply to the performance of this agreement. In general, this requires concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Offi cer for all rehabilitation and demolition of historic properties that are fifty years old or older or that are included on a federal, state or local historic property list. 29. The SUBRECIPIENT must certify that it will provide drug-free workplaces in accordance with the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 USC 701). 30. The SUBRECIPIENT agrees to comply with the following Payments to the Subrecipient are governed by the Federal grants management rules for cost allowability found at 2 CFR 200 Subpart E-Cost Principles. For the purposes of this section, Subrecipient is defined as a described in 2 CFR 200.93. Accordingly, payments will be made on a cost reimbursement basis. Each request for reimbursement shall identify the associated project and approved project task(s) listed under this Scope of Work. The Subrecipient may only incur direct costs that may be attributed specifically to the projects referenced above as defined in 2 CFR 200.413. The Subrecipient must provide adequate documentation for validating costs incurred. Payments to Subrecipient's contractors and vendors are conditioned upon compliance with the procurement requirements provided for in 2 CFR 200.318. Allowable costs incurred by the Subrecipients and Contractors shall be in compliance with 2 CFR Subpart E-Cost Principles. A Developer is not subject to 2 CFR Subpart E, however the County is Subject to 2 CFR Subpart E and may impose requirements upon the Developer in order for the County to remain compliant with its obligation to follow 2 CFR Subpar t E. The Developer will use adequate internal controls, and maintain necessary source documentation for all costs incurred and adhere to any other accounting requirements included in this agreement. 31. Audits shall be conducted annually and shall be submi tted to the COUNTY one hundred eighty (180) days after the end of the SUBRECIPIENT’s fiscal year. The SUBRECIPIENT shall comply with the requirements and standards of 2 CFR Subpart E-Cost Principles. If an Agreement is closed out prior to the receipt of an audit report, the COUNTY reserves the right to recover any disallowed costs identified in an audit after such closeout. 32. Any real property acquired by the SUBRECIPIENT for the purpose of carrying on the projects stated herein, and approved by the COUNTY in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and 49 CFR 24, shall be subject to the provisions of CDBG including, but not limited to, the provisions on use and disposition of property. Any real property within the SUBRECIPIENT control, which is acquired or improved in whole or part with CDBG funds in excess of $25,000, must adhere to the CDBG Regulations at 24 CFR 570.505. 33. As provided in § 287.133, Florida Statutes by entering into this Agreement or performing any work in furtherance hereof, the SUBRECIPIENT certifies that it, its affiliates, suppliers, subcontractors and consultants vrho will perform hereunder, have not been placed on the convicted vendor list maintained by the State of Florida Department of Management Services within the 36 months immediately preceding the date hereof. This notice is required by 5 287.133 (31 (a), Florido Stotutes. 34. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. lf any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub-grants, contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all SUBRECIPIENTS shall certify and disclose accordingly. 35. Travel reimbursement will be based on the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) per diem rates in effect at the time of travel. 36. Any rule or regulation determined to be applicable by HUD. 37. Florida Statutes 713.2O, Paft 1, Construction Liens 38. Florida Statutes 119.021 Records Retention Orga nization Name:Cc\[er Co,r-U bnrd ,{ Ow^'|\s\t'0^etl Ln- Z Q[o \p\ta,A/4-4 Na me/Signatu re:<. /'t)IJ(Please Print) Co,r.\ ffuruo<z (S ignat u re ) ) Title:Date: L >>'t) CERTIFICATION OF CDBG/HOME/ESG FUNDED CONSTRUCTION/REHABILITATION PROJECTS If the applicant anticipates using CDBG/HOME/ESG for construction or rehabilitation, the following federal and county requirements must be acknowledged: 1. All construction or rehabilitation plans and permits must be approved and in place prior to funding. Copies of all permits must be attached to application. 2. The County shall not be obligated to pay any funds to the project prior to the completion of an environmental review of the project and said review is approved by any government agencies as may be required by law. 3. The Applicant will assure all wages paid to construction workers by its or its subcontractors are in compliance with federal, state and local labor requirements. The Applicant agrees to include in the construction bid specifications in connection with this agreement the applicable Federal Wage Determination assigned to this project by HUD. The applicant must also inform the contractor/subcontractors that they will be required to submit documents after a county conducted pre-construction conference and prior to construction. Weekly Davis Bacon reports must be submitted thereafter as required by the federal government. 4. The Applicant agrees to comply with and to assure that its subcontractors comply with the 2 CFR 200 for programs funded in whole or in part of CDBG/HOME funds. 5. Pursuant to Section 109 of the Act, the Applicant specifically agrees tha t no person shall be denied the benefits of the program on the grounds of race, color, sex, religion or national origin. 6. The Applicant agrees, on its own behalf and on behalf of its contractors and subcontractors, to take affirmative action in attempting to employ low income and minority persons, as mandated by law (Section 3). 7. As required by 2 CFR 200 and by Florida Statutes Section 287.055, professional services must be competitively selected. The competitive selection process must include a public advertisement, issuance of a request for application and a competitive review based on uniform criteria. Selection criteria must consider the basic qualifications, professional competence, experience and suitability of each firm. Fees for profess ional services must be requested as a fixed sum and not stated as a percentage of construction costs. 8. All documents, bid specifications, notices and construction drawings must be submitted for review and approval to Collier County Community and Human Services (CHS) prior to public advertisement. 9. Any applicable bidding process for construction contracts, based on Collier County’s Purchasing Thresholds, must include a formal advertisement, published in the Naples Daily News and the Immokalee Bulletin (where applicable). The announcement must include the following: a.Date, time and place that bid documents are available and the same information for any pre-bid conferences and receipt of bids. b. Requirement of bid surety in the amount of ten percent (10'/.1 of the bid and a performance and payment bond equal to L00% of the award. c.Standard statement regarding the "in whole or in part" federal funding of the project and the various applicable federal regulations. 10. The County reserves the right to be present at the time of bid openings. 11. The Applicant agrees to submit to the County all documentation of the steps followed in the selection of professional services and construction contracts. 12. The Applicant agrees to specify a time of construction and include a liquidated damage clause in all construction contracts. Cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost contracts will not be permitted. 13.The Applicant agrees that it will not start construction until an official "Notice to Proceed" has been issued. 14. Pursuant to 570.608 of the CDBG Regulations and the new provisions in the Economic and Community Development Act of 1974 as amended, the Applicant agrees to comply with the inspection, notification, testing and abatement procedures concerning lead- based paint. l, hereby acknowledge that I have read the specific requirements contained in this Certification and that eligibility of my organization's project depends upon compliance with the requirements contained in this document. D(€t h Iv j Cffl"fir'SElue'tName of Organizatio Name/Signature: [-ac E. Ccl^.r (Please Print) 'r i+ l^ J Signatu re) Date: Lt .)a l) Y-K Acknowledgement of Religious Organization Requirements Page 2 I hereby acknowledge that I have read the specific requirements contained in this attachment and that eligibility of my organization's project depends upon compliance with the requirements contained in this agreement. Organization Name Name/Signature: e(l ,*,35ftf.,'erS L€D 9-kl.^s.7,Y +a. (Please Print)(Signature) Title:@ 43 ,\\,Co^t /.. CFc I(r CERTIFICATION FOR THE SUBRECIPIENT OR DEVELOPER OR VENDOR ENTITY CERTIFICATION FOR THE GRANTEE ENTITY Only one required per entity signed by an authorized representative REGARDING DEBARMENT or SUSPENSION, REAL OR APPARENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST, FALSIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS, SUBSTANTIAL NON-COMPLIANCE OR NON-PERFORMANCE UNDER A GRANT, INELIGIBILITY, VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION ON AGREEMENTS/SUB-AGREEMENTS This certification is required by the regulation implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, signed February 18, 1986. The guidelines were published in the May 29, 1987 Fede ral Register (52 Fed. Reg., pages 20360-20369). The Board of County Commissioners further adopted a Resolution (2013-228) effective October 8, 2013 to establish application screening criteria for Collier County administered federal and state grants. The resolution specifies this list of interested parties refers to the following representatives of the grantee organization under any form of arrangement or agreement: Each Board of Directors member Officers of the Board Executive Director All employees and supervisors that will work on the grant Definitions: [Note: The Definitions (1) will be tailored for the applicable grant program] (1) The terms "debarred," "suspended," "ineligible," "person," "principal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this certification, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549 and 45 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations), Part 76. Contact Collier Community and Human Services or go to www.HUD.gov website for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. (2) The term substantial non-compliance or non-conformance as used in this certification includes:  Return of awarded grant funds on more than one occasion in the last three years  Non-compliance with a monitoring corrective action plan  Other substantial non-compliance or non-conformance of a grant  The organization applying for grant funding is hereby certifying and will follow the below listed: 1. Each grantee of federal or state financial and non-financial assistance must sign this debarment certification at time of application. Independent auditors who audit federal or state programs regardless of the dollar amount are required to sign this certification form to include certification of debarment. Collier County Community and Human Services or its agreement grantee/contractors will not contract with subcontractors if they are debarred or suspended by the federal government. 2. Each entity applying for a grant from Collier County will assure all individuals and positions listed above complete and submit appropriate certifications. 3. The grantee shall provide immediate written notice to the grant coordinator at any time the grantee/contractor learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 4. The grantee further agrees by submitting this certification that, it shall not knowingly enter into any sub-agreement with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this contract unless authorized by the Federal Government. 5. The grantee further agrees by submitting this certification that it will require each contractor/subcontractor of agreements and/or contracts referencing this contract whose payment will equal or exceed $100,000 in federal monies, to submit a signed copy of this certification with each sub-agreement. 6. The grantee may rely upon a certification by a subcontractor entity that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from contracting/subcontracting unless the grantee/contractor knows that the certification is erroneous. 7. The grantee has adopted conflict of interest policies and procedures within their organization and will provide a copy of such prior to the execution of an agreement should the grant application be funded. If the grantee does not have conflict of interest policies and procedures they must adopt policies/procedures for determining when a conflict of interest exists and disclosing it to the public as required by the applicable program requirements. The prospective grantee certifies, by signing this certification, that neither the entity nor their above noted principals and respective employees, within the last three years: (1) Has been debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, and declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in contracting with Collier County Community and Human Services by any federal department or agency. Where the prospective grantee is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective grantee shall attach an explanation to this certification. (2) Has had a real or apparent conflict of interest (3) Has falsified documents (4) Has substantial non-compliance or non-conformance with performance under a grant with Collier County or any other entity Collier County Community and Human Services will rely on the certifications of this document as true and reliable. However, the County reserves the right to request additional documentation prior to making a final determination. Collier County Community and Human Scrviccs may rely upon a certification by a nonprofit organization that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from contracting or subcontracting unless the department knows that the certification is erroncous. This certification is a material rcpresentation of fact upon which reliancc is placed when this application is submitted. Ifit is latcr dctermined that the signed knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, the Federal Govemment (via Scction l00l of Title 18 USC for making false statements) and Collier County may pursue availablc remedics, including suspension, debarment, grant award rctraction, and/or suspension from applying for awards for tbrec years under Rcsolution 20t3-228. Namc of Organi ,ution,@\l€l &!l-"!l &oora oC Co,urniSsia6 f-J J Signature of Authorizcd Individual I)atc ) Lz,o <^ 0L0-\ ..-tr. Carl.\, Name and Title of Authorizcd Individual (Print or type) J (/,-?Z UN)\__.e \ ,./ t-/ CERTIFICATION FOR THE DIRECTORS OF THE BOARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEE OR SUPERVISOR One EACH for every director, the executive director, and each staff member proposed to be directly working on or overseeing a staff member directly working on the grant REGARDING DEBARMENT or SUSPENSION, REAL OR APPARENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST, FALSIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS, SUBSTANTIAL NON-COMPLIANCE OR NON-PERFORMANCE UNDER A GRANT, INELIGIBILITY, VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION ON AGREEMENTS/SUB-AGREEMENTS The Board of County Commissioners adopted a Resolution (2013-228) effective October 8, 2013 to establish application screening criteria for Collier County administered federal and state grants. The resolution specifies this list of interested parties refers to the following represen tatives of the grantee organization under any form of arrangement or agreement: Each Board of Directors member Officers of the Board Executive Director All employees and supervisors that will work on the grant Definitions: (1) The terms "debarred," "suspended," "ineligible," "person," "principal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this certification, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549 and 45 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations), Part 76. Contact Collier County Community and Human Services or go to www.HUD.gov website for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. (2) The term substantial non-compliance or non-conformance as used in this certification includes:  Return of awarded grant funds on more than one occasion in the last three years  Non-compliance with a monitoring corrective action plan  Other substantial non-compliance or non-conformance of a grant The undersigned certifies, by signing this certification, that, within the last three years, they have not: 1. Been debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from participation in contracting with Collier County Community and Human Services by any federal department or agency. (Where the prospective individual is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such individual shall attach an explanation to this certification.) 2. Had a real or apparent conflict of interest 3. Falsified documents 4. Had substantial non-compliance or non-conformancc with pcrformance under a grant with Collier ('ounty or any otber enlity Thc undcrsigncd shall provide imrnediate written notice to the grantcc at any timc the undersigned leams that its certification was croneous when submitted or has become erroneous by rcason of changed circumstanccs. Collier County Community and Human Services will rcly on the certification ofthis documcnt as truc and rcliablc. However, the County reserves the right to request additional documentation prior to making a final determination. Namc of Orsanization Rolc of undersigned (Director, Executive Director, Employcc Ispecify rolcl, Supcrvisor [specify role] Signaturc Date: Print or type namc ofsignatory This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance is placcd whcn this application is submitted. If it is latcr determined that the signed knowingly rendercd an crroneous cerlification, the Federal Government (via Section l00l of Titlc l8 USC for making false statements) and Collicr County may pursue available remedies, including suspcnsion, dcbarment, grant award retraction, and/or suspension from applying for awards for three years under Resolution 2013-228. v)LJ2e 1- 1 PURCHASING POLICY OF COLLIER COUNTY I. ESTABLISHMENT OF PURCHASING POLICY Ordinance No. 87-25 provides for the adoption of a Purchasing Policy. Collier County Resolution No. 97-435 establishes the following Purchasing Policy. II. PURCHASING DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES A. The Purchasing Department shall be responsible for: 1. Seeking Maximum Value: Act to procure for the County the highest quality commodities, and contractual services at least expense to the County. 2. Encouraging competition: Endeavor to obtain as full and open competition as possible on all purchases and sales. 3. Procedures: Establish and amend, when necessary, operational procedures for the implementation of the Purchasing Policy provided by ordinance. Said procedures shall become effective only when approved in writing by the County Manager. Copies of the procedures shall be maintained on file in the office of the Purchasing Department. 4. Purchasing Analysis: Keep informed of current developments in the field of purchasing, prices, market conditions and new products, and secure for the County the benefits of research conducted in the field of purchasing by other governmental jurisdictions, national technical societies, trade associations having national recognition, and by private business and organizations. 5. Purchasing Manual: Prescribe and maintain a standard Purchasing Manual for all using agencies. The content of said manual will be governed by this Policy. 6. Forms: Prescribe and maintain such forms as shall be found reasonably necessary to the operation of this Policy. 7. Vendor Certification: Document that vendors doing business with the County have acknowledged their understanding and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the County's Purchasing Policy and have agreed to abide by those terms. 8. Bulk Purchases: Exploit the possibilities of buying "in bulk" so as to take full advantage of discount. 9. Vendors' Catalog File: Prepare, adopt and maintain a vendor's catalog file. Said catalog shall be organized according to materials and/or services and shall contain descriptions of vendors' commodities, prices and discount. 10. Tax Exemptions: Act so as to procure for the County tax exemptions to which it is entitled. 11. Cooperation: Cooperate with using agencies so as to secure for the County the maximum efficiency in budgeting and accounting. 2 12. Suspension and Debarment of Vendors : To oversee and facilitate the suspension and/or debarment of vendors as set forth under Section XXIX of this policy. 13. Inquiry and Control: Have full authority to question the quality, quantity, and kinds of items requisitioned in order that the best interests of the County are served. The Purchasing Director shall have final approval authority for all purchases at or below the formal competitive threshold. To ensure the timely, proper and orderly acquisition of services to the various using agencies, all authority granted to the Purchasing Director in this policy may be formally delegated by the Purchasing Director in whole or in part to appropriate staff members within the County Manager’s agency. III. PURCHASES NOT EXCEEDING $3,000 Purchases that do not exceed $3,000 may be approved by the Purchasing Director without informal or formal competition by means of a purchase order, purchasing card or formal agreement (or any combination therein) as defined under this policy or deemed appropriate by the Purchasing Director. IV. INFORMAL COMPETITION (PURCHASES EXCEEDING $3,000 BUT NOT GREATER THAN $50,000) A. All purchases exceeding $3,000 but not more than $50,000 shall be awarded by the Purchasing Director to the qualified and responsive vendor submitting the lowest or best overall quote which meets all specifications, unless the requirement for competition is waived by the Purchasing Director in accordance with Section 4.B. All such purchases may be solicited and awarded without formal public announcement and without formal competition. 1. Minimum Number Quotes: Open market purchases or sales in excess of $3,000 but less than or equal to the formal competitive threshold shall be based on a good faith effort by the Purchasing Department or the using agency to obtain at least three (3) competitive quotes (including all “no quote” responses). Award shall be made to the lowest, qualified and responsive quote in accordance with the standards set forth in this Policy. 2. Solicitation of Quotes: The Director may solicit quotes orally, written, or electronically for open market pricing or sale, using available bidders' and supplier lists. The Director shall determine in which instances quotations shall be solicited in writing. Further the Director shall determine which agency (e.g.; Purchasing or the using agency) shall obtain the quotations. All quotes in excess of ten thousand dollars $10,000 shall be tendered or confirmed in writing or electronically submitted by the vendor prior to purchase. 3. Public Record: The Director shall keep a record of all open market quotes submitted and such records shall be open to public inspection after award has been made. B. The requirements for requesting quotes from three (3) or more sources are waived and do not require Board action for: 1. Purchase of library books, education and/or Personnel tests, similar audio visual materials, periodicals, printed library cards, etc. 3 2. Professional services; and, in instances when authorized by the Purchasing Director where commodities or services are purchased directly from the owner of a copyright or patent, a governmental agency, a recognized educational institution, a not-for-profit entity or when there are no other identifiable sources available. 3. Purchases that the Director has determined to be legitimate single source purchases. 4. Valid public emergencies or other instances deemed by the Director to be in the best interests of the County. 5. Purchase of services from experts or consultants by or through the Office of the County Attorney for purposes of preparing for or defending against imminent or pending civil litigation or administrative proceedings. C. All purchases greater than $1,000 but less than or equal to $3,000 will generally be processed using a regular purchase order. However, such purchases may be processed using a purchasing card in accordance with Section XXIV of this policy. V. FORMAL COMPETITIVE THRESHOLD (Purchases in excess of $50.000) A. It is the intent of the Board of County Commissioners to establish an amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) as the County's formal competitive threshold for purchases. The established limit shall be applied to all methods of purchase by agencies under the purview of the Board of County Commissioners, including but not limited to competitive sealed bids, competitive proposals and competitive selection and negotiation. The requirement for formal competition may be waived by the Board of County Commissioners where permitted by law, under the following circumstances: 1. Purchase of library books, education and/or personnel tests, similar audio visual materials, periodicals, printed library cards, etc. 2. Single source purchases (pursuant to subsection C). 3. Valid public emergencies (pursuant to Section XX I). 4. Where it is determined to be in the best interests of the County to do so. B. All purchases subject to formal competition shall be awarded by the Board of County Commissioners unless otherwise delegated by the Board via formal public action. C. Exemption For Single Source Commodities: Purchases of commodities and services from a single source may be exempted from formal competition upon certification by the Purchasing Director of both of the following conditions: 1. The item(s) is the only one available that can properly perform the intended function(s); 2. The recommended vendor/contractor is the only one ready, willing and able to meet the County's requirements. All Single Source purchases in excess of the formal competitive threshold shall be exempted from formal competition by the Board. Recurring single source 4 purchases shall not require subsequent Board approval (in the same or in any subsequent fiscal year) provided that there are sufficient budget appropriations to make each purchase. Purchases less than or equal to the formal competitive threshold may be exempted from competition by the Purchasing Director, as permitted by law D. Use of Past Performance Data: In order to promote the qualitative delivery of commodities and services, County departments shall record and consider the past performance of vendors in the award of contracts exceeding the formal competitive threshold. This objective shall be accomplished as follows: 1. The Purchasing Department shall be responsible for each of the following: a. Developing, implementing and maintaining appropriate adm inistrative procedures, instructions and technologies necessary to collect and access vendor performance data. b. Ensuring that relevant past performance data is properly gathered and considered prior to award of subsequent contracts. 2. Using agencies shall be responsible for each of the following: a. Conducting periodic performance evaluations of vendors under contract with the County pursuant to the procedures established pursuant to subsection V.D.1a. b. Considering the past performance of vendors during the evaluation of formal bids and proposals for subsequent contract awards as set forth in the administrative procedures referenced under subsection V.D.1a. VI. COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS Any purchase of commodities or services costing in excess of the formal co mpetitive threshold shall be accomplished by competitive sealed bid, by competitive selection and negotiation (per section VII) or by competitive proposals (per section VIII). Award of Bid Contract shall be made by the Board to the lowest, qualified and responsive bidder except where otherwise provided for in this policy or unless an exception is granted by the Board. Bid limits for requirements utilizing federal or state funds will be those required by said agency granting the funds or the County's requir ements, whichever takes precedence. A. Notice Inviting Bids: 1. Announcement: Notice inviting bids shall be publicly posted by the Purchasing Department in a consistent public location at least ten (10) days preceding the last day established for the receipt of bid proposals. Bids may be solicited and/or received in one or more steps as permitted by law and deemed appropriate by the Purchasing Director. 2. Scope of Notice: The public notice required herein shall include a general description of the commodities/services to be purchased or sold, shall state where bid instructions and specifications may be secured and the time and place for opening bids. 3. Bidders' List: The Director shall also solicit sealed bids from qualified prospective vendors/contractors who have registered their names on the Collier County Purchasing Department vendor database, which will electronically send them a notice of the proposed purchase or sale. Notices 5 sent to the vendors/contractors on the Collier County Purchasing Department vendor database shall be limited to commodities or services that are similar in character and ordinarily handled by the trade group to which the notices are sent. Vendors/contractors are responsible for maintaining their profiles in the database to ensure proper notifications are received. Vendors/contractors may be removed from the database by the Director for continual non-response to formal solicitations and violations to the Purchasing Policy. The Director shall have the discretion to continue to issue formal solicitations and accept formal bids, proposals and other tenders using paper where appropriate. 4. Bid Deposits: When deemed necessary by the Director, bid deposits shall be prescribed in the public notices inviting bids. Said deposits shall be in the amount equal to five percent of the bid submitted. The Director shall have the authority to return the deposits of all bidders prior to award of bid contract by the Board of County Commissioners. A successful bidder shall forfeit an y deposit required by the Director upon failure on the vendor's part to enter into a contract within ten (10) working days after written notice of award. 5. Bid Addenda: An addendum to a specification shall be defined as an addition or change in the already prepared specifications for which an invitation has been issued for formal quotations or an announcement has been posted for a formal sealed bid. Any addendum to a request for formal sealed bids shall be approved by the Department Director or designee and the Purchasing Director. The addendum shall clearly point out any addition or change to the invitation for bids. The Purchasing Department shall be responsible for insuring that addenda are available on the e-procurement website and that all prospective bidders who have downloaded specifications are notified of the addendum prior to opening of bids. B. Procedure for Bids: 1. Sealed Bids: Sealed bids shall be submitted manually or electronically to the Director and if manual shall be clearly identified as bids on the outside of the sealed envelope. 2. Opening: Bids shall be opened publicly at the time and place stated in the public notices and shall be witnessed and certified by the Purchasing Department. 3. Tabulation: A tabulation of all bids received shall be made either electronically or manually by the Purchasing Department and shall be available for public inspection. C. Tie Bids: Where there are low tie bids, the award process shall first be subject to Section 287.087, F.S. In the event that all of the tied bidders comply with Section 287.087, F.S., the Purchasing Department shall determine if any of the bidders would be considered a local business as defined under Section XI of this policy. If one (and only one) of the bidders is determined to be a local business, then award of contract shall be made to that bidder. In the event that two or more local bidders are tied thereafter, award of contract shall be made in accordance with Section XI.2.(a) of this policy. 6 D. Rejection Of Bids And Negotiation: 1. The Board of County Commissioners shall have the authority to reject any and all bids. 2. Subsequent to applying the procedures set forth under Section XI (2)(a) (where applicable), if the lowest, qualified responsive bid exceeds the budgeted amount and if the purchase is not funded in whole or in part with interagency grant dollars, the Purchasing Director may negotiate changes with the apparent lowest qualified and responsive bidder that will bring prices into budgeted limits subject to the final approval and acceptance of the Board. If the budgeted amount includes grant funds, the Purchasing Director shall be authorized to conduct such negotiations provided said actions are not prohibited by law or the grant conditions. 3. If no bid is received, the Board of County Commissioners may authorize the Purchasing Director to purchase by negotiation under conditions most favorable to the public interest and when said purchase will result in the lowest ultimate cost of the commodities or services obtained. E. Waiver Of Irregularities: The Board of County Commissioners shall have the authority to waive any and all irregularities in any and all formal bids. F. Award Of Bid Contract: The Chairman, when authorized by majority vote of the Board or as otherwise provided for in this policy, shall execute formal contracts having a binding effect upon the County. Formal, bilateral contracts shall not be required where a purchase order is sufficient. A formal contract shall be awarded by the Board of County Commissioners to the lowest qualified and responsive bidder. In addition to the price shall be considered the following: 1. The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform the contract. 2. The ability of the bidder to perform the contract within the time required or the least time, if appropriate, without delay or interference. 3. The experience and efficiency of the bidder. 4. The quality and performance of previous contracts awarded to the bidder. 5. The previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to the contract. 6. The quality, availability and adaptability of the commodities or contractual services to the particular use required. 7. The ability of the bidder to provide future maintenance and service (where applicable). All recommendations for award for bid contract will be reviewed and approved by the Purchasing Director prior to presentation to the Board of County Commissioners. Bidders competing for a prospective bid award (and their agents/representatives) will not be permitted to publicly or privately address the Board regarding a prospective purchase prior to the time of award unless requested to do so by the Purchasing Director or by a majority vote of the Board. 7 VII. PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES A. Because differences in price may only be a minor concern compared to qualitative considerations, professional services may be exempted by the Purchasing Director from the competitive bidding process. Instead, professional services will be typically acquired through one of the following methods: 1. Competitive Selection and Negotiation. 2. Competitive Proposals (pursuant to Section VIII). B. A professional service shall be defined as assistance obtained in support of County operations from an independent contractor in one or more of the following professional fields: 1. Appraisal Services - real and personal property appraisers. 2. Architecture, professional engineering, landscape architecture, or register ed land surveying services (as per Section 287.055, F.S.). 3. Audit and Accounting Services - auditors and accountants (excepting the selection of the annual auditor which shall be conducted as per Section 11.45, F.S.). 4. Consultants - planning, management, technological or scientific advisors. 5. Financial Services - bond counsel, rating and underwriting, financial advisor, and investment services. 6. Legal Services - attorneys and legal professionals. 7. Medical Services - medicine, psychiatry, dental, hospital, and other health professionals. C. Requests exclusively for services defined under VII.B.2 will be procured in a manner consistent with Section 287.055, F.S., known as "The Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act" as required by said statute. Projects may include, but are not strictly limited to one or more of the following: 1. Fixed assignment contracts: A grouping of minor professional service (including construction inspection services) assignments. 2. Fixed term contracts: Countywide agreements for various and miscellaneous minor professional services (including construction inspection services) on an as needed basis. 3. General Professional Services: Includes administration, support and management of engineering, architectural, surveying and planning activities. Prior to issuing a work order under a contract identified under Section VII.C.1 -3, the Director shall have the discretion to solicit project or task specific proposals from one firm or from multiple firms under a fixed term contract. In such instances, each solicitation shall be issued on a "best value" basis where qualifications and price are considered. Each solicitation shall include at minimum a description of work to 8 be performed and the criteria to be used to evaluate each proposal. For all "best value" based solicitations, price shall not exceed 50 percent of the total evaluation criteria. The Director shall be authorized to approve all work orders where the maximum initial dollar amount does not exceed two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) and where the maximum initial contract amount does not exceed seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000). Any work order and/or contract that exceeds that amount subsequent to award and prior to completion of the work shall be subject to the provisions of Section XV.C of this resolution. Projects shall not be sub -divided to circumvent the dollar thresholds established herein. All fixed term agreements issued under this section shall be eligible for extension or renewal in accordance with the provisions of Sections XV.D and E respectively. D. For all service procurements in excess of the formal competitive threshold under the Competitive Selection and Negotiation method, authority to announce and distribute Requests for Proposals or Letters of Interest and Qualifications and to appoint and empower a selection committee shall be pursuant to Section VIII.B. hereof. E. Final selection of the professional service provider (award of contract) shall be made by the Board of County Commissioners. F. Purchases for all professional services estimated to be equal to or less than the formal competitive threshold may be approved by the Purchasing Director, as permitted by law. G. Requests for outside legal services will be referred to the County Manager and the County Attorney for review and comment as to whether said services are necessary and/or appropriate. Requests for outside legal services may be exempted from formal competition by the Board of County Commissioners at the request of the County Manager or County Attorney. H. The acquisition of services from experts or consultants for purposes of preparing for or defending against imminent or pending litigation or administrative proceedings shall be exempt from all competitive requirements of this policy. Any such acquisitions that do not exceed $50,000 may be approved by the County Attorney and the Purchasing Department without further action. Acquisitions that exceed $50,000 may be authorized by the County Attorney and the Purchasing Department, but will be reported at a regular meeting of the Board for ratification. VIII. COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS A. The Competitive Proposals process is a method of contract selection that may be utilized by the Purchasing Director under circumstances where one or more of the following conditions exist: 1. Where qualitative considerations are of equal or greater concern than pricing considerations. 2. Where the conditions of the purchase do not lend themselves to the formal sealed bid process or the award of a firm, fixed fee contract. 3. Where the County is incapable of specifically defining the scope of work for which the commodity(s) or service(s) is required and where the qualified offer 9 is asked to propose a commodity(s) or service(s) to meet the needs of the County. 4. Where the County desires to enter into a single contract for the design and construction of a public construction project(s). B. For purchases in excess of the formal competitive threshold and where appropriate or required by law, the competitive proposals process will be utilized. The process will be conducted in a manner similar to the sealed bid process as set forth under Section VI except where otherwise stated in this section. The competitive proposals process shall proceed as follows: 1. A Request for Proposals (RFP) will be prepared and distributed in a manner consistent with the definition of said term found in Section 2 of Collier County Ordinance No. 87-25. Notice of said request(s) shall be publicly posted by the Purchasing Department at least 21 calendar days preceding the last day established for the receipt of proposals. 2. Each Request for Proposals shall identify the appropriate evaluation procedures and criteria to be applied to the selection of the best proposal among the respondents. Each RFP pertaining to the award of a design/build contract(s) shall be subject to the requirements of Section 287.055 F.S. 3. Prior to the announcement and distribution of the RFP, a selection committee shall be appointed by the County Manager to evaluate the proposals received. For all purchases made under the Competitive Proposals method, the County Manager may empower the selection committee to designate and rank the proposals prior to the commencement of negotiations and to negotiate a tentative agreement, subject to award by the Board. 4. Proposals may be solicited and/or received in one or more steps as permitted by law and deemed appropriate by the Purchasing Director. U nless otherwise prohibited by law, the Purchasing Director shall have the discretion to solicit and conduct simultaneous or concurrent negotiations with one or more firms. C. For purchases in excess of the formal competitive threshold, final selection of the awardee will be made by the Board of County Commissioners. D. Purchases less than or equal to the formal competitive threshold may be authorized by the Purchasing Director, as permitted by law and shall not require formal solicitation or announcement unless deemed necessary by the Purchasing Director. IX. PROCUREMENT OF DESIGN/BUILD CONTRACTS A. Procurements for the design and construction of public construction projects may be obtained through a single contract with a firm selected in a manner permitted under Section 287.055, F.S. and the procedures set forth in this section. B. Upon completion of the Design Criteria Package, procurements of Design/Build services shall be processed in a manner consistent with Section VIII hereof entitled "Competitive Proposals". C. Administrative procedures shall be established by the County Manager or his designee for utilization of the design criteria professional concerning the evaluation of the proposals submitted by the design/build firms, the supervision or the 10 approval by the County of the work drawings of the project and evaluation of the project construction with the design criteria package. D. The Board of County Commissioners may declare a public emergency, where appropriate and authorize the using agency to negotiate an agreement for Board approval with the best qualified design-build firm available at that time. X. Small and Disadvantaged Minority and Women Business Enterprises A. Policy Statement: Collier County stands committed to providing equal opportunities to small businesses and disadvantaged business enterprises (DBE), minority business enterprises (MBEs) and women enterprises (WBEs) as well as to all vendors, consultants, contractors and subcontractors who seek to do business with the County. Pursuant to this policy, Collier County will require its vendors, consultants, contractors and subcontractors to provide qualified small businesses and DBE's with an equal opportunity to participate in the formal competitive processes for the procurement of commodities and services by the County. The Policy is not intended to require or to allow partiality toward or discrimination against any small business or DBE, MBE, WBE, or any other vendor, consultant, contractor or subcontractor on the basis of gender, race or national origin, or other such factors, but rather to help ensure that small businesses and DBEs, MBEs, WBEs, and all qualified vendors, consultants, contractors and subcontractors have an equal opportunity to participate in the County's formal competitive processes. Nothing in this Policy shall be construed to provide for or require any preference or set-aside based on gender, race, national origin or any other such factor. B. Definitions: For purposes of this policy, the term "small business" shall have the same definition as set forth under Section 288.703.(1), F.S. The term "DBE" shall include any "small business" as defined pursuant to Section 288.703(1) that is at least 51 percent owned or controlled by a person or pers ons defined as "socially and economically disadvantaged" individuals pursuant to Section 14-78.602(18), F.A.C. Reference to these definitions, however, shall in no way be construed to provide that the County has adopted or is subject to the provisions o f the Statute or Code referenced herein. C. Implementing Measures: In an effort to implement this policy, the County may undertake the following measures: 1. Designate the Purchasing Director to administer this policy. 2. Utilize outreach programs to identify, register and educate small businesses and DBEs, MBEs and WBEs to participate in the procurement/contract process including, but not limited to: a. Attending trade fairs which include representatives from these enterprises. b. Attending meetings and social events wherein these enterprises. c. Utilizing publications aimed at reaching these enterprises. 11 d. Utilizing directories and other reference sources that list these enterprises. e. Publicizing this Policy to encourage these enterprises to participate in the County's procurement process. f. Other actions designed to identify these enterprises who seek to provide commodities and services to the County. 3. Maintain a list of these enterprises. 4. Disseminate information regarding competitive opportunities with the County in order to allow qualified small businesses and DBEs, MBEs and WBEs to participate in the County's procurement process. D. Conformity with Applicable Law: The provisions of this section shall be construed in conformity with applicable state and federal law. To the extent that state law conflicts with federal law, federal law shall supersede such state law. XI. Procedure to Provide Preference to Local Businesses in County Contracts . Except where otherwise provided by federal or state law or other funding source restrictions or as otherwise set forth in the purchasing policy, purchases of commodities and services shall give preference to local businesses in the following manner: (1) “Local Business” defined Local business means the vendor has a valid occupational license issued by Collier County at least one year prior to bid or proposal submission to do business within Collier County that authorizes the business to provide the commodities or services to be purchased, and a physical business address located within the limits of Collier County from which the vendor operates or performs business. Post Office Boxes are not verifiable and shall not by used for the purpose of establishing said physical address. In addition to the foregoing, a vendor shall not be considered a "local business" unless it contributes to the economic development and well-being of Collier County in a verifiable and measurable way. This may include, but not be limited to, the retention and expansion of employment opportunities, the support and increase to the County's tax base, and residency of employees and principals of the business within Collier County. Vendors shall affirm in writing their compliance with the foregoing at the time of submitting their bid or proposal to be eligible for consideration as a "local business" under this section. A vendor who misrepresents the Local Preference status of its firm in a proposal or bid submitted to the County will lose the privile ge to claim Local Preference status for a period of up to one year. (2) Preference in purchase of commodities and services by means of competitive bid, request for proposals, qualifications or other submittals and competitive negotiation and selection. Under any such applicable solicitation, bidders/proposers desiring to receive local preference will be invited and required to affirmatively state and provide documentation as set forth in the solicitation in support of their status as a local business. An y bidder/proposer who fails to submit sufficient documentation with their bid/proposal offer shall not be granted local preference consideration for the purposes of that specific contract award. Except where federal or state law, or any other funding source, mandates to the contrary, Collier County and its agencies and instrumentalities, will give preference to local businesses in the following manner: (a) Competitive bid (local price match option). Each formal competitive bid solicitation shall clearly identify how the price order of the bids received will be evaluated and determined. When a qualified and responsive, non-local business submits the lowest price bid, and the bid submitted by one or more qualified and responsive local 12 businesses is within ten percent of the price submitted by the non-local business, then the local business with the apparent lowest bid offer (i.e.; the lowest local bidder) shall have the opportunity to submit, an offer to match the price(s) offered by the overall lowest, qualified and responsive bidder. In such instances, staff shall first verify if the lowest non-local bidder and the lowest local bidder are in fact qualified and responsive bidders. Next, the Purchasing Department shall determine if the lowest local bidder meets the requirements of Section 287.087, F.S. If the lowest local bidder meets the requirements of 287.087, F.S., the Purchasing Department shall invite the lowest local bidder to submit a matching offer to the Purchasing Department which shall be submitted to the Purchasing Department within five (5) business days thereafter. If the lowest local bidder submits an offer that fully matches the lowest bid from the lowest non-local bidder tendered previously, then award shall be made to the local bidder. If the lowest local bidder declines or is unable to match the lowest non-local bid price(s), then award will be made to the lowest overall qualified and responsive bidder. If the lowest local bidder does not meet the requirement of Section 287.087, F.S. and the lowest non-local bidder does, award will be made to the bidder that meets the requirements of the reference state law. (b) Request for proposals, qualifications or other submittals and competitive negotiation and selection. For all purchases of commodities and services procured through the Competitive Proposals (Section VI) or Competitive Selection and Negotiation (Section VIII) methods not otherwise exempt from this local preference section, the RFP solicitation shall include a weighted criterion f or local preference that equals 10 percent of the total points in the evaluation criteria published in the solicitation. Purchases of professional services as defined and identified under subsection VII.B.2 (which are subject to Section 287.055, F.S.) and subsection VII.B.3 (which are subject to Section 11.45, F.S.) shall not be subject to this local preference section. (3) Waiver of the application of local preference. The application of Local Preference to a particular purchase or contract for which the Board of County Commissioners is the awarding authority may be waived upon approval of the Board of County Commissioners. (4) Comparison of qualifications. The preferences established herein in no way prohibit the right of the Board of County Commissioners to compare quality of materials proposed for purchase and compare qualifications, character, responsibility and fitness of all persons, firms or corporations submitting bids or proposals. Further, the preferences established herein in no way prohibit the right of the County Commission from giving any other preference permitted by law instead of the preferences granted herein. (5) Reciprocity. In the event Lee County, or any other Florida county or municipality (“local government”) deemed appropriate by the Collier County Board of Commissioners, extends preferences to local businesses, Collier County may enter into an interlocal agreement with such local government wherein the preferences of this section may be extended and made available to vendors that have a valid occupational license issued by that specific local government to do business in that local government that authorizes the vendor to provide the commodities and services to be purchased, and a physical business address located within the limits of that local government. Post Office Boxes are not verifiable and shall not be used for the purpose of establishing said physical address. In addition to the foregoing, a vendor shall not be considered a "local business" unless it contributes to the economic development and well-being of the said local government whichever is applicable, in a verifiable and measurable way. This may include, but not be limited to, the retention and expansion of employment opportunities, the support and increase to that local government’s tax base, and residency of employees and principals of the business located within the limits of that local government. Vendors shall affirm in writing their compliance with the foregoing at the time of submitting their bid or proposal to be eligible for 13 consideration as a "local business" under this section. In no event shall the amount of the preference accorded other local government firms exceed the amount of preference that such local government extends to Collier County f irms competing for its contracts. (6) Purview and administration of this policy. This policy shall apply to all departments and units under the direct purview of the Board of County Commissioners. The Purchasing Department shall be responsible for deve loping, implementing and maintaining administrative procedures in support of this policy. (7) Subsequent Review and Sunset Provision. Pursuant to the adopting resolution, this local preference section is being added to the purchasing policy in support of the local economy during difficult economic times in Collier County. On or about one year of the effective date, the Purchasing Department will provide the Board with an update of the results and impacts to date of this local preference policy. Within two years of the effective date, the Board shall receive a similar report from the Purchasing Department and shall determine whether to continue or modify this policy. Should the Board not elect to continue the local preference policy, it will expire at that time. XII. PAYMENT OF INVOICES A. It is the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that all agencies under its purview be in compliance with Section 218.70 F.S., otherwise known as the "Local Government Prompt Payment Act". Pursuant to this, the requirements of this section shall apply to the following transactions: 1. The purchase of commodities and services; 2. The purchase or lease of personal property; 3. The lease of real property. B. The Purchasing Director shall have the authority to establish and maintain a procedure that authorizes minor payment variances between the purchase order and invoice where warranted. The authority to pay such variances shall not exceed 5% of the purchase order amount or $500, whichever is less. C. Additionally, the Purchasing Director shall be permitted to establish and maintain a procedure that authorizes the payment of freight and delivery charges that are not specifically identified on the purchase order. D. It shall be the responsibility of the Purchasing Director, in consultation with the Finance Director and using agencies, to establish, distribute and administer procedures for the timely payment of all transactions as defined under XII.A hereof. Such procedures shall include, but not be limited to the following: 1. Formally defining the County's requirements for the content and submission of a proper invoice, codifying the County's payment requirements and formally notifying each vendor of their availability. 2. Steps required for the receipt of all invoices and the prompt return of improper invoices. 3. Steps required for the resolution of payment disputes between the County and a vendor. 14 E. Each December, the Finance Director and the Purchasing Director shall submit a joint report to the Board listing the number and total dollar amount of interest penalty payments made during the preceding fiscal year. XIII. PAYMENT OF DUES FOR MEMBERSHIP IN PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS County funds may be used to pay for dues for membership in a profe ssional or other organization provided that such expenditure meets the following criteria: 1. Such membership is deemed necessary to meet duties and responsibilities required by Federal, State or local mandate or to facilitate proper professional development. 2. The organization of membership is of a non-profit nature. 3. Sufficient funds are available within the proper appropriation unit/summary code. XIV. STANDARDIZATION, COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AND GOVERNMENTAL CONTRACTS A. Where standardization is determined to be desirable by the Director, the purchase of commodities may be made by negotiation with the approval of the Board of County Commissioners if more than the competitive bid limit or by the County Purchasing/General Services Director if less than or equal to the competitive bid or negotiation threshold. B. The Director shall have the authority to approve purchases under State of Florida and Federal GSA cooperative contracts. The Director shall also be authorized to join with other units of government in cooperative purchasing ventures prior or subsequent to award when in the best interests of the County. If funds have already been budgeted, no further Board action will be required. In authorizing all such purchases under pre-existing agreements, the Director shall have determined that the term and conditions of the purchase are competitive in the market and favorable to the County. XV. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION A. Contract Document: Every procurement of contractual services or commodities shall be evidenced by a written document containing all provisions and conditions of the procurement. Said document shall include, but not be limited to: 1. A listing of the scope of services to be performed or commodities to be purchased. 2. A provision specifying the criteria and the final date by which such criteria must be met for completion of the contract. 3. A provision specifying the terms of cancellation by the County and where applicable, a provision specifying the terms of renewal. 4. Where applicable, a provision establishing the appropriate types and levels of insurance to be carried by the vendor. Said provision shall be employed in a manner consistent with minimum insurance standards approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 15 5. Where applicable, pursuant to Section 287.133 F.S., a provision requiring the contractor/vendor to inform the County if he/she has been convicted of a public entity crime subsequent to July 1, 1989. A purchase order that embodies these provisions s hall be sufficient documentation of the procurement. The Purchasing Director shall have the discretion to determine the circumstances under which a purchase order (and all documents included by reference) shall serve as the contract document. B. Contract Manager: Every procurement of services shall be administered by the using agency (requesting department). C. Contract Changes: Notices issued under a purchase or contract may be authorized and executed by the Purchasing/General Services Director, excepting notices that terminate a Board-approved purchase or contract in its entirety. Modifications to a Board approved purchase or contract, including but not limited to change orders, supplemental agreements, amendments and changes by letter may be authorized and executed by the Purchasing/General Services Director provided that the change (or the sum of the changes) amounts to not more than the greater of (i) 10 percent of the current Board approved amount. or (ii) $10,000. The proviso at the end of the previous paragraph shall not be applicable to term contracts or blanket purchase orders where the County desires to procure commodities and/or services on an as needed basis without having to obligate itself to a total contract amount. Rather, such purchases shall be based on fixed unit prices or other predetermined pricing methods and shall be limited in quantity by the amount of funds appropriated in the budget of the using agency(ies). Such purchases shall be subject to all other provisions of this polic y. Notices that terminate an entire purchase or contract that was Board approved, and contract modifications that increase the total contract amount beyond the limits set forth above as applicable, shall require the approval of the Board of County Commissioners or as otherwise provided for in this policy. The Board shall have broad authority, within the limits of the law, to evaluate and approve any recommended contract modification without requiring further competition. All deductive changes pertaining to the use of direct material purchases, including those that reduce the contract amount by more than ten percent below the current Board approved contract amount shall be reported to the Board monthly as part of the monthly contract changes report and shall not require prior Board approval. D. Contract Extension: Extension(s) of a Board-approved contract for commodities or services may be requested by the contract manager to the Purchasing/General Services Director in writing for a period not to exceed six (6) months (cumulatively) and shall be subject to the same terms and conditions set forth in the initial contract. The Purchasing/General Services Director shall have the authority to authorize and execute all such extensions. Any extension(s) that exceed six months (cumulatively) shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Extensions of contracts that do not (inclusive of the extension) exceed the formal competitive threshold may be authorized and executed by the Purchasing/General Services Director without Board action. E. Contract Renewal: The Purchasing/General Services Director shall have the authority to authorize and execute renewals of contracts for commodities and/or services subject to the following conditions: 16 1. That the Contractor has performed in a satisfactory manner and that the Director has received a request to renew from the Contract Manager verifying the Contractor's satisfactory performance. 2. That the agreement is renewed subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the initial contract. Costs and terms of any contemplated renewals are included in the invitation to bid or request for proposals. 3. That the renewal is done on an annual basis, commencing at the end of the initial contract period. Any such contracts shall not be renewed for more than 3 years unless competitively procured. Proposed renewals that fail to meet one or more of the conditions set forth herein will require the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. F. Contract Approval: All formal, bilateral contracts for commodities and services in excess of the formal, competitive threshold shall be authorized by the Board of County Commissioners. Such agreements for purchases less than or equal to the formal, competitive threshold may be authorized and executed by the Purchasing Director, subject to the review and approval for legal sufficiency by the Office of the County Attorney. G. Work Orders (Not Under CCNA): The Purchasing/General Services Director may authorize and execute any work order if the work order is equal to or below such Board approval parameters for work orders as are set forth in either the Board approved term contract for services under which the work order is generated, the solicitation document (s) that resulted in the contract or the Executive Summary that pertains to the contract. Modifications to a work order may be authorized and executed by the Purchasing/General Services Director, provided that the work order, as modified, does not exceed $100,000 or if it does, the change (or sum of the changes) does not exceed 10% of the current Board approved amount. The above provisions of the Section G shall not apply to work orders, or modifications to work orders, governed by Section VII.C above. H. Consent to Assignments of Contract: For all contracts which exceed the formal competitive threshold, the Board of County Commissioners shall approve all assignments of contracts requested by the predecessor contracting party. For such requests for agreements below the formal competitive threshold, the Purchasing/General Services Director shall have the authority to approve assignments on behalf of the agency. I. Authority Limitation and Delegation; Promulgation of Procedures: The Purchasing/General Services Director may delegate to one or more other Board employees any or all aspects of the authority vested in the Purchasing/General Services Director to authorize and/or execute contracts or contract-related documents pursuant to Section VII.C above and Sections C through G of this Article XV or otherwise under law. All authority to authorize and execute documents that is vested pursuant to this Article XV in the Purchasing/General Services Director or any other person shall be subject to the limits of any applicable federal, state or other law. 17 The Purchasing Department shall be responsible for establishing and maintaining administrative procedures that set forth any delegations of authority made pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this Section I, that set forth formal processes for each of the instruments referenced in this Article XV, and that are in all respects subject to the provisions of this Article XV. These procedures shall also set forth generalized requirements for (i) such pre - execution reviews of documents by the Office of the County Attorney and (ii) pre- execution reviews of documents by such other departments, if any, as the Purchasing/General Services Director determines to be appropriate and advisable. J. Payments to Contractors, Vendors and Consultants Prior to the execution of a formal contract subject to this policy, the Purchasing Department shall have the discretion to establish a formal payment schedule and payment terms within the agreement. Such terms and conditions shall be consistent with the requirements of all applicable laws and the formal solicitation documents. In accordance with Section 218.735 (8), F.S., the Purchasing Director shall establish procedures to reduce to 5% the amount of retainage withheld from each subsequent progress payment issued to a contractor where applicable. The Purchasing Director, or his designee, shall have the discretion to establish, in writing, a schedule(s) to further reduce the percentage of cumulative retainage held throughout the course of the project schedule where warranted. The discretion of the project manager to reduce the percentage of cumulative retainage shall be subject to the following: 1. That the term "cumulative retainage" is defined to mean "the dollar total of the funds retained from all payments issued under the contract divided by the gross dollar total of all monthly pay requests (or the total of all payment amounts deemed allowable by the project manager, whichever is less)". 2. That any decision to reduce retainage shall be formally communicated in a letter to the Contractor's appropriate representative and that the letter affirmatively states that the Contractor has performed the contract work in a satisfactory manner. 3. That the cumulative retainage not be adjusted until at l east 50% of the work has been completed and payment has been issued. 4. That the Purchasing Director's letter expressly sets forth the percentage of cumulative retainage to be held for the remaining pay requests. The Purchasing Director's designee shall also be granted the discretion to authorize the partial release or payment of contract retainage to the contractor prior to final completion of all project work provided that: 1. The contractor has performed in a satisfactory manner to date. 2. The total aggregate work under the agreement is at least 50% completed and accepted (i.e.; payments equaling at least 50% of the contract amount less retainage have been issued) 18 3. The retainage dollar amount to be released is based upon and consistent with the prevailing percentage of cumulative retainage being held at the time that the retainage is released. XVI. PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS A contractor or vendor shall provide a surety bond from a surety company to guarantee full and faithful performance of a contract obligation and the payment of labor and material expended pursuant to a contract whenever, and in such amounts, as required by statute or otherwise as deemed necessary by the Purchasing Director. An irrevocable letter of credit from a financial institution operating within the State of Florida (or other alternative forms of surety as permitted under Florida law) may be sufficient in place of the performance bond if so provided for in the bid and contract documents. All such bonds or letters of credit shall be approved as to form by the County Attorney. XVII. UNAUTHORIZED PURCHASES No County officer or employee shall intentionally order, other than by purchasing card as permitted under this policy, the purchase of any commodities or services, or make any contract within the purview of this policy other than through the Purchasing Director. Any purchase order or contract made contrary to the provisions hereof shall not necessarily be approved and the County shall not be bound thereby. All purchases mad e within the provisions of this Policy shall be made with a purchase order or purchasing card, whichever is appropriate. In the event that a purchase transaction is found to be in violation of this policy, the Purchasing Director shall determine the facts pertaining to the transaction. In consultation with the appropriate operating department director, the Purchasing Director shall determine whether it is in the best interests of the County to proceed with the purchase and if so, under what conditions. If a determination is made to proceed with the purchase, all such transactions in excess of the formal competitive threshold (or other applicable Board authorization thresholds set forth in this policy) shall require the approval of the Board. All such transactions equal to or less than the formal competitive threshold may be approved by the Purchasing Director. A. Exceptions: This section shall not apply to the payment of premiums for insurance policies that have been acquired through prior Board action. This section shall not apply to nor supersede Resolution Nos. 86-30, 86-209 and 87-16. XVIII. PROHIBITION AGAINST SUBDIVISION No contract or purchase shall be subdivided to avoid the requirements of this Policy. XIX. PROTEST OF BID OR PROPOSAL AWARD The purpose of this section is to accommodate legitimate protests concerning formal competitive invitations and recommended contract awards above the competitive bid or proposal thresholds prior to award of contract by the Board of County Commissioners . A. Any actual or prospective bidder or respondent to an Invitation for Bids or a Request for Proposals, who alleges to be aggrieved in connection with the solicitation or award of a contract, (hereafter referred to as "the protesting party") may protest to the Purchasing Director, who shall serve as the sole recipient of any and all notices of intent to protest and all formal protests. B. All formal protests with respect to an Invitation for Bids or a Request for Proposals shall be submitted to the Purchasing Director in writing not less than four hours prior to the opening of bids or the closing time for acceptance of proposals. The 19 Purchasing Director, in consultation with the contract manager (and other appropriate County staff), shall have the authority to address all such protests received under subsection B and to determine whether postponement of the bid opening or proposal closing time is appropriate. The Purchasing Director's decision shall be considered final and conclusive unless the protesti ng party files a subsequent formal protest of the recommended contract award as described under this section. C. Any actual or prospective bidder or respondent to an invitation for bids or a Request for Proposals who desires to formally protest a recom mended contract award shall submit a notice of intent to protest to the Purchasing Director within two (2) calendar days, excluding weekends and County holidays, from the date of the initial posting of the recommended award. D. All formal protests with respect to a recommended contract award shall be submitted in writing to the Purchasing Director for a decision. Said protests shall be submitted within five (5) calendar days, excluding weekends and County holidays, from the date that the notice of intent to protest is received by the Purchasing Director. The formal protest shall contain, but not be limited to the following information: 1. Name and address of County agency affected and the bid number and title. 2. The name and address of the protesting party. 3. A statement of disputed issues of material fact. If there are no disputed material facts, the written letter must so indicate. 4. A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged and of any relevant rules, regulations, statutes, and constitutional provisions entitling the protesting party to relief. 5. A demand for the relief to which the protesting party deems himself entitled. 6. Such other information as the protesting party deems to be material to the issue. E. In the event of a timely protest of contract award consistent with the requirements of this section, the Purchasing Director shall not proceed further with the award of the contract until all appropriate administrative remedies as delineated under this section have been exhausted or until the Board of County Commissioners makes a determination on the record that the award of a contract without delay is in the best interests of the County. Neither the protesting party, their agents or their representatives shall have any private contact or discussions with individual County Commissioners or any independent hearing officer (where applicable) regarding the protest prior to the protest being heard or reviewed by either of the aforementioned unless requested to do so by the Purchasing Director. F. The Purchasing Director shall review the merits of each timely protest and in consultation with the contract manager and other appropriate County staff, issue a decision stating the reasons for the decision and the protesting party’s rights of appeal under section XIX. Said decision shall be in writing and mailed or otherwise furnished to the protesting party. The decision of the Purchasing Director shall be final and conclusive unless the protesting party delivers a subsequent written objection to the Purchasing Director within two (2) calendar days, excluding weekends and County holidays from the date of receipt of the decision. G. In the event of a subsequent objection pursuant to subsection F, the County Manager shall have the discretion to appoint an independent hearing officer to 20 review the facts relevant to the protest. The appointed officer will have a maximum of 60 days to schedule and conduct a hearing into the matter and issue a finding of fact and a opinion in writing to the County Manager for submission to the Board of County Commissioners. Prior to commencement of the hearing, the protesting party shall be required to post a cash surety in an amount equal to one (1) percent of the using agency's estimate of the contract amount or one-thousand dollars ($1,000), whichever is less. Should the Hearing Officer find in favor of the County, the protesting party shall forfeit the surety as partial payment for undue delay. Otherwise, the surety will be returned to the protesting party. H. In the event that the protest cannot be resolved by mutual consent, the matter will be referred to the Board of County Commissioners for final resolution. I. Failure to file a formal protest within the time and manner prescribed by Section XIX shall constitute a waiver of the right to protest by any protesting party as defined by subsection A of this section. XX. CONTRACT CLAIMS All actual or prospective claims arising against the County from contractors, vendors or any other party in direct privity with the County to provide commercial commodities or services shall first be directly addressed by the parties’ administrative representatives in a manner consistent with the agreement between the parties and in accordance with the County’s Procurement Administrative Procedures Manual. For any prospective or actual claims or disputes arising under any contract entered into by the County, the Purchasing Director shall have the discretion to arbitrate or mediate the claim or dispute or may appoint an independent third party to do so within the authorization threshold limits of this policy. XXI. EMERGENCY PURCHASES A. By County Manager: In case of an emergency which requires immediate purchase of commodities or services in excess of the formal competitive threshold, the County Manager shall be empowered to authorize the Director to secure by open market procedure as herein set forth, any commodities or services. The County Manager shall have the authority to act in the case of any emergency including the issuance of emergency change orders/supplemental agreements. Any emergency action shall be reported at the first available regular or special meeting of the Board of County Commissioners. The County Manager shall further be authorized to approve payment(s) to vendors at the time of or shortly after purchase should the circumstances warrant. B. By Purchasing Director: In case of any emergency which requires immediate purchase of commodities or services equal to or less than the formal competitive threshold, the Purchasing Director shall be empowered to secure such services and commodities by open market procedure as herein set forth. Such action shall be reported immediately to the County Manager when appropriate. This section in no way constrains the provisions of Collier County Ordinance No. 84-37. XXII. INSPECTION AND TESTING The Director shall inspect, or supervise the inspection of, or cause to be inspected, all deliveries of commodities or services to determine their conformance with the specifications set forth in an order or contract. 21 A. Inspection by Using Agency: The Director shall have the authority to authorize using agencies having the staff and facilities for adequate inspection to inspect all deliveries made to such using agencies under rules and regulations which the Director shall prescribe. B. Testing: The Director shall have the authority to require chemical and physical tests of samples submitted with bids and samples of deliveries which are necessary to determine their quality and conformance with specifications. In the performance of such tests, the Director shall have the authority to make use of laboratory facilities of any agency of the County or of any outside laboratory. XXIII. SURPLUS COMMODITIES AND TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY All using agencies shall submit to the Director, at such times and in such form as shall be prescribed, reports showing stocks of all tangible personal property which are no longer used or which have become obsolete, worn out or scrapped. A. Transfer: The Director shall have the authority to transfer surplus stock to other using agencies. B. Sale: The Director shall have authority to sell all commodities of a value less than the limits proscribed under Chapter 274 F.S., which have become un suitable for County use. Sales under this section shall be made to the highest responsible bid and in conformance with Section, 274, F.S. The Director shall be authorized to approve all sales where the net revenue to the County does not exceed $50,000. Al l sales exceeding $50,000 in net revenue to the County will be approved by the Board prior to completing the sale or conducting the sales event. C. Trade In: The Director shall be authorized to approve purchases that include the “trade in” of existing items (including assets) pursuant to the purchase of new, replacement or upgraded items/services. D. Donation: Operating departments under the purview of the Board of County Commissioners shall be authorized to accept items donated to the County. The receipt of all items not considered to be assets as defined under Florida law is to be documented by a letter from the operating department director to the donating entity. Items considered to be assets are to be documented using the appropriate forms and forwarded to the Fixed Assets Section of the Clerk of Courts Finance Division. Documentation is to include, but not be limited to; the date the asset(s) was received; the estimated fair market value of the asset(s); a description of the asset(s); a serial number if applicable and the fund/cost center under which the asset(s) will be assigned. E. Disposition of Assets: The Director shall have the authority to determine whether previously-acquired items (including assets) that are no longer useful to the agency have commercial value and if not, to dispose of such items in an appropriate manner with or without offering such items for sale, trade or donation to other entities. The Fixed Assets Section of the Clerk of Courts’ Finance Division will submitted a quarterly report that identifies any assets that are disposed of under the provisions of this subsection. XXIV. PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM The Director shall be responsible for the overall management and operation of the County’s purchasing card program. For the purpose of this policy, a purchasing card is a 22 credit card officially assigned to specific employees under the purview of the Board of County Commissioners’ agency for the purpose of transacting small and/or strategic purchases. The Director shall be authorized to assign cards to employees for these purchases. The Director shall have the authority to establish the following dollar limits for each assigned card: A. Single Transaction Limit: Not to exceed $1,000 per card unless otherwise authorized by the Director. B. Monthly Spending Limit: Not to exceed $10,000 per card unless otherwise authorized by the Director. C. Strategic Purchases: The Director may utilize (or delegate the authority to other Purchasing Department staff to utilize) a purchasing card to place orders that exceed the limits set forth under this section in instances where one or more of the following is true: 1. Where the purchase is to address a valid public emergency; or 2. Where the County will earn revenue through card program rebates ; or 3. Where a vendor is requiring the County to order by purchasing card. D. Sales Tax Compliance: Pursuant to Section 212.08(6), F.S., County purchases transacted with vendors within the State of Florida are exempt from the state sales and use tax. In such instances, it is the responsibility of the cardholder to provide the vendor with the appropriate tax exemption information when the card is presented to the vendor. In the event that the cardholder refuses to grant the tax exemption when the card is presented, the cardholder is authorized to allow the tax to be charged to the card. It is the position of the Board that it is not cost effective or in the public interest to require a cardholder to seek a credit for sales tax collected when the total sale does not exceed $300. In the event that the total sale exceeds $300, the cardholder’s department director (or their designee) is responsible to ensure the tax is returned to the County for the purchase. E. Rebates: All purchasing cards rebates will be credited to the general fund unless otherwise specified by the Director. In all such instances, the Director shall ensure that the purchase has been approved subject to all other provisions of this policy. All fixed assets purchased using a purchasing card shall be properly recorded and tracked through the Fixed Assets Section of the Clerk of Courts Finance Division. The language of this section is not intended to supersede the provisions of Collier County Resolution 2006-49. XXV. SEVERABILITY If any one or more of the provisions of this Policy should be held contrary to any provision of law or contrary to express law, though not expressly prohibited, or against public policy, or shall for any reason whatsoever be held invalid, then such provision(s) shall be null and void and shall be deemed severable from the remaining provisions of this Policy and in no way shall affect the validity of all other provisions of this Policy. 23 XXVI. REPEAL PRIOR AND CONFLICTING All resolutions and policies or parts of resolutions and policies, in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed. XXVII. EFFECTIVE DATE An official copy of this Policy shall be filed in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners immediately after enactment and this Policy shall take effect at that time. XXVIII. CONFLICT OF INTEREST When procuring commodities or services using County funds, each entity and employee under the purview of the Board of County Commissioners shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws concerning conflict of interest. For state or federal Community Development Block Grant-funded projects, entities and employees shall comply with the requirements of Part 85, Section 36(b)(3) of the Housing and Urban Development Code. XXIX. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION The Board shall grant authority to County staff to suspend and/or debar vendors, contractors, consultants and other interested and affected persons from active participation in obtaining County contracts. The purpose of any such action shall be to protect the County's interests and the integrity of the County's contracting process. The suspension and debarment processes shall be considered to be separate from and in addition to the award evaluation and vendor performance evaluation processes authorized elsewhere in this policy. A. Definition of Terms: For the purposes of this section, the following terms have been defined as follows: 1. Affiliate refers to associated business entities or individuals that control or could control the contractor or are controlled by the contractor or could be controlled by the contractor. 2. Civil Judgment refers to a judgment or finding of a civil offense by any court of competent jurisdiction. 3. Contractor means any individual or legal entity that: a. Directly or indirectly (e.g.; through an affiliate), submits offers for or is awarded, or reasonably may be expected to submit offers for or be awarded, a County contract for construction of for procurement of commodities and services, including professional services; or b. Conducts business, or reasonably may be expected to conduct business, with the County as an agent, surety, representative or subcontractor of another contractor. c. For the purposes of this section, the terms "vendor" and "consulta nt" shall have the same meaning as "contractor" and the term "sub consultant" shall have the same meaning as the term "subcontractor". 4. Conviction means a judgment or conviction of a criminal offense, felony or misdemeanor, by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether entered upon a verdict or a plea, and includes a conviction entered upon a plea of no lo contendere. 24 5. Debarment means action taken by the County to exclude a contractor from County contracting and County-approved subcontracting for a reasonable, specified period as provided herein. 6. Preponderance of the Evidence means proof by information that, compared with that opposing it, leads to the conclusion that the fact at issue is more probably true than not. 7. Subcontractor: Any individual or legal entity that offers or agrees to provide commodities or services to a party deemed to be a contractor under this section. 8. Suspension refers to action taken by the Purchasing/General Services Director (hereinafter referred to as "the PGS Director") to temporarily disqualify a contractor from County contracting or County-approved subcontracting. B. Suspension: The Purchasing/General Services Director shall have the authority to suspend a contractor, subcontractor or person from consid eration for award of contracts if there appears to be a reasonable basis for debarment as set forth under Section XXIX. If a suspension precedes a debarment, the suspension period shall be considered in determining the debarment period. The suspension period shall not exceed three months without the approval of the County Manager. A decision to suspend by the Purchasing/General Services Director shall be considered final and conclusive with no right of appeal. C. Debarment: 1. Causes for Debarment: The prospective causes for debarment include one or more of the following: a. Conviction for commission of a criminal offense as an incident to obtaining or attempting to obtain a public or private contract or subcontract, or in the performance of such contract or subcontract. b. Conviction under state or federal law of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, receiving stolen property, or any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty which currently, seriously and directly affects responsibility as a contractor. c. Conviction under state or federal antitrust laws arising out of the submission of bids, proposals or other competitive offers. d. Violation(s) of county contract(s) provisions, which is (are) deemed to be serious and to warrant debarment, including the failure, without good cause, to perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, specifications, scope, schedule or any other provisions of the contract(s). e. Refusal to provide bonds, insurance or other required coverages and certifications thereof within a reasonable time period. f. Refusal to accept a purchase order, agreement or contract, or perform accordingly provided such order was issued timely and in conformance with the solicitation and offer received. 25 g. Presence of principals or corporate officers in the business of concern, who were principals within another business at the time when the other business was suspended or debarred within the last three ye ars under the provisions of this section. h. Violation of the ethical standards set forth under applicable state or county laws. i. Debarment of the contractor by another public agency. j. Any other cause deemed to be so serious and compelling as to materially affect the qualifications or integrity of the contractor. 2. Debarment Procedure: a. The county department requesting the debarment action shall submit to the PGS Director a written complaint setting forth the reason(s) for seeking debarment and shall identify a recommended debarment period. b. The PGS Director shall review the complaint, verify whether it is compliant with the provision of this policy, direct any appropriate changes and forward the complaint to the contractor. c. The contractor shall review the complaint and shall provide a written response (with supporting documentation) to each allegation. The response shall be provided to the PGS Director within 10 (ten) business days of receipt of the allegations submittal. In the e vent that the contractor fails to respond to the complaint within the prescribed time period, the complaint, as forwarded to the contractor, shall become an effective debarment decision without further appeal. d. In the event that the contractor files a timely and complete response to the complaint and the debarment action is based upon a conviction, judgment or other event(s) where there is no significant dispute over material facts, the PGS Director shall determine the period of debarment on the basis of the undisputed material information set forth or referenced in the complaint, the contractor's reply and the parameters set forth in this section. In the event that the Contractor objects to the PGS Director's decision, the Contractor shall have a maxim um of three business days to file an appeal of the debarment decision with the PGS Director. The appeal will be forwarded to and considered by the County Manager (or his designee), who will review the debarment record compiled by the initiating department and the contractor. Should the County Manager overturn the PGS Director's decision; the County Manager shall formally cite the reasons for doing so. e. In the event that the contractor files a timely and complete reply to the complaint and where the facts are in dispute, the Purchasing Department will convene a debarment committee (hereinafter referred to as "the committee") consisting of at least three individuals who will review the complaint and the contractor's reply. The County Manager or his designee shall formally appoint the committee, which will generally consist of county employees, none of whom shall be a member of the department initiating the complaint. At the discretion of the County Manager, a member from private industry with a particular area of relevant expertise may be appointed to the committee, provided that this member is not a direct or 26 indirect competitor of the firm in question. The Office of the County Attorney shall appoint a representative to attend the hearing. The representative shall not be considered a voting member of the committee, but shall be available to provide legal counsel to the committee as necessary. All members appointed to serve on the debarment committee shall disclose, to the PGS Director, or his designee , any actual or prospective conflicts of interest at the time of appointment or at the time in which the member becomes aware of the actual or prospective conflict. f. The PGS Director, or his designee, shall chair the committee and serve as the Purchasing Department's representative to the committee. The Purchasing representative shall preside over and facilitate the deliberations of the committee as a non-voting member and serve as the County's liaison to the Contractor in the debarment process. All voting committee members are prohibited from having any communication regarding the debarment issue outside the committee deliberations with any of the parties involved in the specific debarment or their representatives until after the committee decision has been issued or, in the event of an appeal of that decision by the Contractor, until the conclusion of the appeal process. All committee deliberations are subject to Section 286.011 F.S. g. Where the material facts are in dispute, the committee shall evaluate the evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses and base its decision upon the preponderance of the evidence. Should the contractor fail to appear at the debarment hearing, the contractor shall be presumed to be unqualified and or non-responsive and shall be subject to debarment. The committee decision shall be by a majority vote of those voting members in attendance. The committee shall be the sole trier of fact. In the event that the committee decides to impose debarment, the debarment decision will formally include, but not be strictly limited to the following information: 1) The specific reasons for the debarment; 2) The scope of the debarment; and 3) The period of debarment, including the effective and expiration dates. The committee's decision shall be issued in writing within 20 business days of the conclusion of the hearing unless the committee extends this period for good cause. h. The PGS Director shall forward the committee's decision to the contractor and affiliates involved. Should the Contractor object to the committee's decision, the Contractor shall have a maximum of three business days to file an appeal of the debarment decision with the PGS Director. The appeal will be forwarded to and considered by the County Manager (or his designee), who will review the debarment record compiled by the initiating department, the contractor and the committee. Should the County Manager overturn the committee's decision; the County Manager shall formally cite the reasons for doing so. 3. Debarment Period: a. At its sole discretion, the committee shall determine the period of debarment. The debarment period shall be commensurate with the severity of the cause(s) and in no event shall be the debarment period exceed five years without the approval of the Board. 27 b. At its sole discretion, the committee (having the same or different composition) may reduce the debarment period upon a written request from the contractor to do so, based on one or more of the following reasons: 1. Newly discovered material evidence; 2. A reversal of the conviction, civil judgment or other action upon which the debarment was based; 3. Bona fide change in ownership or management; 4. Elimination of other causes for which the debarment was imposed; or 5. Other reasons that the committee might deem appropriate. The contractor's request shall be submitted to the PGS Director in writing and shall be based on one or more of the aforementioned reasons. c. The decision of the committee regarding a reduction of the debarment period is final and not subject to appeal. 4. The Effects of Debarment: a. Debarred contractors are excluded from receiving County contracts. Departments shall not solicit offers from, award contracts to, or consent to subcontractors with debarred contractors, unless the County Manager or his designee determines that emergency or single source conditions exist and grants written approval for such actions. Debarred contractors are excluded from conducting business with the County as agents, representatives, subcontractors or partners of other contractors. b. The Purchasing Department shall notify all Board departments of the final debarment decision and the effects of that decision wi th regard to conducting business with the debarred entity(ies) during the debarment period. 5. Continuation of Current Contracts: a. Departments may not renew or otherwise extend the duration of current contracts with debarred contractors in place at the time of the debarment unless the PGS Director or his designee determines that it is in the best interests of the County to allow the contractor to continue or finish the work within an additional, limited period of time. b. Debarment shall constitute grounds for terminating an open agreement with a contractor. However, the contract manager may permit completion of an open contract(s) provided that the debarred contractor has performed in a satisfactory manner to date under the open contract(s) unless otherwise directed by the PGS Director. 28 6. Restrictions on Subcontracting: a. When a debarred contractor is proposed as a subcontractor for any subcontract subject to County approval, the department shall not consent to subcontracts with such contractors unless the County Manager or his designee determines that emergency or single source conditions exist, thus justifying such consent and approves such decision. b. The County shall not be responsible for any increases in contract costs or other expenses incurred by a contractor as a result of rejection of proposed subcontractors pursuant to subsection 6.a provided that the subcontractor was debarred prior to the submission of the applicable bid or proposal offer. 7. The Scope of Debarment: Debarment applies to all officers, principals, directors, partners, qualifiers, divisions or other organizational elements of the debarred contractor, unless the debarment decision is limited by its terms to specific divisions, organizational elements or commodity/services. The committee's decision includes any existing affiliates of the contractor if they are specifically named and are given written notice of the proposed debarment and an opportunity to respond. Future affiliates of the contractor are subject to the pre-existing terms of the committee's decision. 2/10/09 Exhibit 16 Organizations Current Balance Exhibit 17 Internal Revenue Service Form 990 N/A – Collier County Government Sources: Esri, DeLorme, HERE, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, EsriChina (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom Low and Moderate Income Block Groups in Collier County, FY 2015 Legend Collier County Low and Moderate Income Block Groups 51%+ Low Mod Income Population 0 105Miles¯ Source: HUD's FY 2015 Estimates of Low and Moderate Income Individuals, retrieved from:https://www.hudexchange.info/manage-a-program/acs-low-mod-summary-data-block-groups-places/ Exhibit 18. LMA Collier County, FY 2015 Sources: Esri, DeLorme, HERE, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp.,NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand),TomTom Zoomed View Low and Moderate Income Block Groups in Collier County, FY 2015 0 42Miles¯ Source: HUD's FY 2015 Estimates of Low and Moderate Income Individuals, retrieved from:https://www.hudexchange.info/manage-a-program/acs-low-mod-summary-data-block-groups-places/ Legend Collier County 51%+ Low Mod Income Population Exhibit 19 Annual Operational Plan Workshop 2016-2017 Immokalee Area Census Map: Exhibit 20 – Immokalee Area Census Designation Map CRA & MSTU Boundary MSTU Urban Boundary 5 CRA Redevelopment Area Boundary Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyExhibit 22 Immokalee Perdestrian Crosswalk Improvements Study Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyProject ObjectiveGoal is to Improve Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety!Slide 2 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyProject Location MapSlide 3 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyWork Completed•Crash Analyses–Summarizing 2005 to 2012•Vehicular Counts–Traffic Volume & Speed•Pedestrian/Bicycle Counts–Nine Zones at Peak Hours•Qualitative Assessment–Observations/ RecommendationsCrash AnalysesVehicular CountsPedestrian/Bicycle CountsQualitative AssessmentSlide 4 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyCrash Analyses•Review & Analyses of Crash Reports–Summarize 2005 to 2012Pedestrian/Bicycle Crashes–Graphically Show Places of Concern•Convenience Store on 7thStreet•Restaurant & Theater/Game Room on 3rdStreetCrash AnalysesVehicular CountsPedestrian/Bicycle CountsQualitative AssessmentSlide 5 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements Study2005‐2012 Day Crashes2KEYDriver at Fault Pedestrian/Bicycle at Fault (No Alcohol) Pedestrian/Bicycle at Fault(Alcohol‐Related) Fatal IncidentNSlide 6TOTAL CRASHES = 13CRASHES INVOLVING DUI = 4FATAL = 0 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements Study2005‐2012 Night Crashes2N2222Slide 7KEYDriver at Fault Pedestrian/Bicycle at Fault (No Alcohol) Pedestrian/Bicycle at Fault(Alcohol‐Related) Fatal IncidentTOTAL CRASHES = 29CRASHES INVOLVING DUI = 13FATAL = 3 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements Study2005‐2012 Crash AnalysesTYPE TOTAL DUI FATALDay 13 4 0Night 29 13 3Total 42 17 3Pedestrian 27 13 3Bicyclist 15 4 0Total 42 17 3Slide 8 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyVehicular Counts•72 Hour Bi‐Directional Traffic Counts–Collected Between January 9thto 11th& 16th to 18th–Traffic Volumes & Vehicle SpeedsCrash AnalysesVehicular CountsPedestrian/Bicycle CountsQualitative AssessmentSlide 9FDOT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS OFFICE “It is common traffic engineering knowledgethat about 85 percent of all drivers travel atreasonably safe speeds for the various roadway conditions they encounter, regardless of speedlimit signs. This leaves 15 percent of drivers who must be reminded of the maximum speed limit.The Departmentuses the "85th percentile" method of determining appropriate and safeposted speed limits in conjunction with the maximum statute based speeds.Thismethod isbased on extensive nationally accepted studies and observations. By measuring the speed ofhundreds of vehicles at various points along the roadway, traffic engineers are able to use data todetermine a reasonable and safe maximum speed to post for all vehicles to travel.” Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyVehicular Speed AnalysisDIRECTIONAVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMEMEAN (AVERAGE) SPEED85TH PERCENTILE SPEEDMain StreetEastbound 6,350 26.05 mph 33.24 mphWestbound 5,661 26.33 mph 33.24 mph1stStreetNorthbound 7,270 33.19 mph 39.53 mphSouthbound 7,751 33.67 mph 39.22 mphSlide 10 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyPedestrian/Bicycle Counts•Pedestrian Counts Conducted at Nine Locations–Zones Determined by Observations–Weekday & Weekend•2 Hours AM Peak•2 Hours PM PeakCrash AnalysesVehicular CountsPedestrian/Bicycle CountsQualitative AssessmentZONE NUMBER123456789Total 161 280 487 19 1,390 343 326 90 759Slide 11 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyPedestrian/Bicycle Counts161280487191,39034332690759# of Pedestrian/Bicycle CountsSlide 12 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative Assessment•During Peak Hours During Harvest Season–January 16th& 18th•5:00 AM –8:00 AM•4:00 PM –7:00 PM•Summarize Observations & Recommendations–Improve Pedestrian & Bicyclist SafetyCrash AnalysesVehicular CountsPedestrian/Bicycle CountsQualitative AssessmentSlide 13 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative AssessmentOBSERVATION •Pedestrians CuttingThrough MediansSlide 14 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsRECOMMENDATION•Install Fence/Railing in Median to Direct Pedestrians to Crosswalk/Median OpeningsSlide 15 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative AssessmentOBSERVATION •Pedestrians Using Shortest Path of TravelSlide 16VEHICLE SPEEDESTIMATED SURVIVAL PERCENTAGE FOR PEDESTRIAN20 mph 95%30 mph 60%35 mph 40%40 mph 20%50 mph Nearly No SurvivalNATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION STUDY DATA Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsRECOMMENDATION•Designate “Pedestrian Zone” & Lower Speed to 30 mphSlide 17 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative AssessmentOBSERVATION •Large Number of Signs & Flashing Beacons Distract DriversRECOMMENDATION•Remove Excessive Signing & Beacons•Install In‐Pavement Lighting at Crosswalks w/ Flashing Highlighted SignsSlide 18 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative AssessmentOBSERVATION •Harvester Bus Pick Up Lot & Grocery/Café Generate High Volume of Pedestrians Crossing at/or Between 2ndStreet & 3rdStreet –Over 2,000 Pedestrians Crossing in Area for the AM & PM Studied Peak Hours–1,400 Pedestrians Using Crosswalk at 3rdStreet•Broken Fence Between 2ndStreet & 3rdStreet Slide 19 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsRECOMMENDATION•Coordinate w/ Owner to Fix Fence•Install Fence/Railing in Median•Install New Crosswalk at 2ndStreetSlide 20 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative AssessmentOBSERVATION •Narrow 6‐Foot Wide Median Opening Prohibits Two‐Way Bicyclists from Crossing Simultaneously 6’Slide 21 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsRECOMMENDATION•Widen Median Opening to 10 Feet Near 5thStreet & 7thStreetSlide 22 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative AssessmentOBSERVATION •Many Bicyclists Do Not Have Lights or Reflectors RECOMMENDATION•Coordinate w/ FDOT Community Traffic Safety Team to Distribute Free Lights through Bike Lights ProgramSlide 23 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative AssessmentOBSERVATION •Large Number of School Students Crossing East of 7thStreet During the Week Between 2:15‐2:30 PM & 3:45‐4:00 PMSlide 24 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsRECOMMENDATION•Detailed Evaluation Needed to Determine if Crosswalk at 7thStreet is WarrantedSlide 25 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative AssessmentOBSERVATION •Vehicles Not Yielding to Pedestrians in Crosswalks During Saturday Evenings•Vehicles Typically Yielding During the Other TimesRECOMMENDATION•Increase Enforcement During Saturday Evening HoursSlide 26 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative AssessmentOBSERVATION •Over 750 Pedestrians Documented Crossing Near 1stStreet & Colorado Avenue During Four AM & PM Peak Hours on Weekdays & WeekendsSlide 27 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsRECOMMENDATION•Install Crosswalk on 1stStreet North of Colorado AvenueSlide 28 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative AssessmentOBSERVATION •Street Planters & Trees Limit Motorists Visibility of PedestriansSlide 29 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsRECOMMENDATION•Remove or Modify Landscaping to Low Profile Plants, at a Minimum 100 Feet Near CrosswalksSlide 30 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative AssessmentOBSERVATION •Various Street & Pedestrian Lighting is Not Currently Working on Main Street & 1stStreet RECOMMENDATION•Coordinate w/ Maintenance to Replace all Non‐Functioning LightingSlide 31 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyQualitative AssessmentOBSERVATION •Limited Sight Distance at Main Street/3rdStreet IntersectionRECOMMENDATION•Install High Emphasis CrosswalkSlide 32 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudySummary (Interim Improvements)•Main Street & 1stStreet–Landscaping Grant/Contract•Install Fence/Railing/Barrier•Widen Median Openings from 6 feet to 10 feet•Modifying Landscaping in medians–Coordinate w/ Maintenance to Fix Lighting–Coordinate w/ FDOT Regarding the “Bike Lights Program”–Coordinate w/ Law Enforcement to Increase Enforcement for Motorists to Stop for Pedestrians in Crosswalks Slide 33 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudySummary (Long‐Term Improvements)•Main Street (Coordinate w/ FDOT for Approval) –Install In‐Pavement Lights w/ Automatic Detection & Signing–Add Mid‐Block Crossing at 2ndStreet & Possibly at 7thStreet–Lower Speed Limit to 30 mph & make it a “Pedestrian Zone”–Remove Signs–Install High Emphasis Crosswalks on Side Streets•1stStreet–Install In‐Pavement Lights w/ Automatic Detection & Signing–Add Mid‐Block Crossing at Colorado AvenueSlide 34 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyAny Questions?Slide 35 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements Study Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsSlide 37 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsSlide 38 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsSlide 39 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsSlide 40 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsSlide 41 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsSlide 42 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsSlide 43 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyRecommendationsSlide 44 Immokalee Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements StudyPedestrian/Bicycle CountsDAYPEAK HOURSZONE NUMBER123456789Weekday AM 4 33 10 10 318 101 89 18 86Weekday PM 85 81 145 2 380 49 65 24 235Weekend AM 9 30 71 6 244 117 92 13 98Weekend PM 63 136 261 1 448 76 80 35 340Total 161 280 487 19 1,390 343 326 90 759Slide 45 Public Realm Plan Immokalee Central Business District Prepared by: Prepared for: DRAFT Exhibit 23 Immokalee CBD Public Realm Plan PAGE 2 DRAFT Table of Contents i. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 4 I. THE VISION FOR IMMOKALEE ................................................................................................................. 6 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) .......................... 7 A. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 7 B. Character ........................................................................................................................ 10 1. Roadway Sections .............................................................................................. 10 2. Gateways ............................................................................................................ 12 3. Distinguishing Elements ..................................................................................... 13 C. Current Land Use ........................................................................................................... 14 1. Commercial ........................................................................................................ 17 2. Institutional and Government ............................................................................. 19 3. Residential .......................................................................................................... 21 4. Vacant Land ....................................................................................................... 23 D. Built Environment ............................................................................................................ 26 1. Pedestrian Amenities .......................................................................................... 26 2. Building Uses and Form ..................................................................................... 28 3. Transit ................................................................................................................. 29 4. Access Drives ..................................................................................................... 30 5. Drainage ............................................................................................................. 32 E. Challenges & Opportunities ........................................................................................... 34 III. BRANDING........................................................................................................................................................ 35 A. Proposed Gateways ....................................................................................................... 36 1. Central Business District Gateway Columns ...................................................... 38 2. Large Entry Monument ....................................................................................... 38 3. Small Entry Monument ....................................................................................... 38 4. SR 29 Pedestrian Bridge .................................................................................... 38 B. Wayfinding Signage ........................................................................................................ 40 IV. PUBLIC PLAZA DESIGNS ......................................................................................................................... 41 A. Proposed 1st Street Plaza ............................................................................................... 42 B. Proposed 9th Street Plaza ............................................................................................... 44 V. MAIN STREET/SR 29 STREETSCAPE - CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ........... 46 A. Increase Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety ........................................................................ 48 B. Unite the Design Themes of the Two Plazas .................................................................. 48 C. Intermediate Streetscape Concept ................................................................................. 49 1. Bump-outs .......................................................................................................... 49 2. Paving ................................................................................................................. 52 PAGE 3 DRAFT 3. Crosswalks ......................................................................................................... 53 4. Center Pavement Medallion ............................................................................... 55 5. Street Furniture ................................................................................................... 55 6. Landscape ......................................................................................................... 57 D. Long-Range Streetscape Concept ................................................................................ 59 E. Intermediate and Long-Range Streetscape Concept Comparison ............................... 62 1. Restricted Access .............................................................................................. 62 2. Parking Counts .................................................................................................. 63 VI. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN .......................................................................................................................... 64 A. Design Standards .......................................................................................................... 64 B. Cost Estimates ............................................................................................................... 64 APPENDIX A. EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE PUBLIC REALM STUDY AREA ................... 70 A. Overview of Planning Efforts by the Immokalee CRA .................................................... 70 B. Future Land Use and Zoning ......................................................................................... 70 C. Existing Land Use .......................................................................................................... 76 D. Local Roadway Level of Service .................................................................................... 78 E. Environmentally Significant Lands ................................................................................. 78 F. Subarea 1: Northern Immokalee .................................................................................... 79 G. Subarea 2: Suburban Immokalee .................................................................................. 83 H. Subarea 4: Agricultural-Industrial Immokalee ................................................................ 86 I. Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan .............................................................................................. 89 APPENDIX B. CD OF SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: • Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan, H.W. Lochner, Inc., December 2004 • SR 29 Landscape Plans, McGee and Associates, 2009 • Community Traffic Safety Team, Road Safety Audit Report: Immokalee MSTU Landscape Median, Traffic Operations Department, Collier County, February 2009 • Cost-Estimates Spreadsheets for Proposed Public Realm Improvements • PowerPoint - Plazas • PowerPoint - Streetscape • Intermediate and Long-Range Streetscape Plans COMPANION DOCUMENT: Central Business District Form Based Guidelines Table of Contents PAGE 4 DRAFT Executive Summary This Public Realm Plan establishes a distinct “brand” for Immokalee, defined by an updated streetscape design, new way-finding and signage recommendations, and the creation of conceptual plans for two public plazas. Additionally, this report includes a stand-alone form-based code that pro-vides clearly articulated standards and guidelines for the development and redevelopment of build-ings and structures adjacent to the public realm. This form-based code deals with development on private property which, technically speaking, is separate from the public realm; however the built environment abutting public spaces greatly influ-ences an individual’s experience of place. With that in mind, the form-based code was developed to complement and enhance the Public Realm Plan and is presented as a companion document. The Public Realm Plan and its unified design theme focuses on an area identified as the Central Business District (CBD). The CBD includes the Main Street/State Road 29 corridor from 9th Street to the east and East 2nd Street to the west, and the South 1st Street corridor from Pine Street on the north to the Seminole Casino on the south. This corridor is approximately 1.1 miles long. The intent of the Public Realm Plan is to enhance and promote the unique image and character of Immokalee. As the CBD develops and attracts new investments, the multicultural heritage of the corri-dor will be preserved and enhanced. The unified design scheme will ensure that future redevelop-ment activity highlights the Latin flavor of Immoka-lee; implements the vision outlined in Section I; promotes a safe walkable downtown; and pro-vides civic spaces that promote social interaction. This Public Realm Plan consists of six major sec-tions, and a companion document: I. Vision Statement for Immokalee The vision statement sets forth the envisioned fu-ture for Immokalee, as developed by the Commu-nity Redevelopment Agency. This vision is the basis for this Public Realm Plan. II. Existing Conditions Report The first step in developing new streetscape and design guidelines is to thoroughly understand the current conditions, including road and right-of-way conditions, building placement, land uses, current regulatory conditions, the assets of the community, and the ways in which the down-town public realm is currently being used by residents. III.Branding The design of public spaces can enhance a com-munity’s character and even create a unique sense of place. Through careful design of the public realm, and specifically the Central Business District (CBD), Immokalee can showcase its personality and create a brand for itself. The elements of design used to create this unique brand or image for Immokalee are based on the rich multi-cultural influ-ences that have given Immokalee its essence. IV.Public Plaza Designs Currently, there are no plazas or great squares for public gatherings in downtown Immokalee. Public gathering places, such as zócalos in Mexico, are the heart of the Mexican-Tenochtitlan community, and are often anchored by a church or market place. In Immokalee, the two proposed plazas are intended to inspire community pride and revitalize the CBD by creating a more livable and walkable community, and are proposed as “anchors” for the CBD. V. Main Street/SR 29 Streetscape An integrated, signature streetscape can enhance a community in many ways, and set the stage for a unique and vibrant downtown destination. When combined with a coordinated wayfinding and gate-way system, a unique brand or image for Immokalee will come alive. A well-designed streetscape may also serve as a catalyst for economic development and strengthen the community’s sense of place. VI.Implementation Plan The implementation plan presents a timeline and sequence by which the projects identified within the Public Realm Plan may be implemented. The Plan provides cost estimates for signage, public plazas, and streetscape improvements as pre-sented in this report. The implementation plan sets the foundation for i. Executive Summary PAGE 5 DRAFT future action to take place. Based on the guidelines and standards set forth, the next steps in the imple-mentation process will include: • Acquisition of parcels for public plazas; • Development of construction documents for streetscape improvements (contracted through the Immokalee Beautification Mu-nicipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU) to JRL Design), followed by actual construction; • Development of construction documents for plazas, followed by actual construction; and • Approval and adoption of design guidelines (to be done as part of the Immokalee Land Devel-opment Code update being undertaken by RWA, Inc.). Companion Document: Central Business District Form-Based Standards In conjunction with the Public Realm Plan, there is another report, provided under separate cover, enti-tled “Central Business District Form-Based Stan-dards.” Buildings and structures directly adjacent to public right-of-way are not technically part of an area’s public realm; however, they are a crucial part of the built environment and define the look and feel of a place. The form-based standards serve as a guide to development within Immokalee’s down-town and aim to create a cohesive urban building pattern that enhances the pedestrian experience. PAGE 6 DRAFT ” “ Those of us who live and work in Immokalee envision a great future for our town. We see new business and job opportunities in international trade and distribution, agri-business, ecotourism, recreation and entertainment, and the construction industry. We see Immokalee as an attractive, clean community with affordable-workforce housing, neighborhood parks, and outstanding schools -- a place where people walk and bicycle to do their errands, and where parents are returning to classrooms to finish their education and master new job skills. Main Street will have a Latin flavor – plazas, outdoor cafés, shops, and entertainment – attracting both the local com-munity and the tourists who come to explore our unique ecology or gamble at the Casino. -Penny Phillippi, Executive Director, Immokalee CRA I. Vision for Immokalee PAGE 7 DRAFT A. Introduction As part the Immokalee Area Master Plan Update process, it became apparent that creating a dis-tinct sense of place for the Immokalee community; promoting economic revitalization of the downtown area; and creating safe, walkable public spaces were community priorities that needed to be ad-dressed immediately. Through the leadership of the Community Redevelopment Agency staff and the Immokalee Area Master Plan Visioning Com-mittee, the following Public Realm Plan came into being. The public realm, which includes all public spaces within an urban environment – streets, sidewalks, parks, plazas, and open space, not only defines an area’s physical environment, but also plays a central role in creating a sense of place and can even influence the social fabric of a com-munity. Immokalee has an active and recognizable central business district (CBD); however, the physical en-vironment and economic conditions in this area are not as favorable as community residents and merchants desire. Additionally, this area does not capitalize on the social activity that currently exists in the downtown area. The CBD is the heart of Immokalee, but dedicated civic spaces are lacking and pedestrian and bicycle safety seems to be an afterthought. Immokalee’s CBD is unique in com-parison to most Florida towns in that it has such a high percentage of bicycle and pedestrian traffic. This, of course, provides certain safety and opera-tional challenges, but creates great opportunities in developing a vibrant and active downtown. It was determined during the update of the Master Plan that addressing the public realm and the pe-destrian environment could create a much stronger sense of community, help “brand” Immokalee, as well as stimulate economic development in the area. RWA and their sub-consultant, Land Design Innovations, were commissioned by the CRA to develop a Public Realm Plan to achieve the fol-lowing objectives. II. Existing Conditions in the Central Business District Figure 1. Location Map PAGE 8 DRAFT Public Realm Plan Objectives: 1. Create a brand or theme for Immokalee that showcases the diverse cultural heri-tage of the community; 2. Incorporate this brand into streetscape, gateways, and wayfinding concepts; 3. Create public plazas for social activity that integrate the unified design theme; and 4. Develop design standards for future develop-ment in the Immokalee CBD that are consis-tent with the public realm theme and pro-grammed improvements. The Plan builds upon existing beautification im-provements and proposes a distinct Immokalee brand through a unified theme that integrates an enhanced streetscape design, wayfinding and entrance signage, and public plazas. In order to strengthen the theme and to create a distinct sense of place, design standards and guidelines for private development along the public realm are also included as a stand alone document. In developing the Public Realm Plan, an area of approximately 790 acres was initially studied. This area consisted of the State Road (SR) 29 corridor from Lake Trafford Road at the north end to New Market Road at the south end. (See Figure 1Loca-tion Map, and Figure 2, Boundaries of the Study Area.) The corridor included the public right-of-way and adjacent private lands. The Study Area was broken down into four “subareas” for ease of dis-cussion and analysis. Through this analysis, the logical borders of the CBD were identified. The CBD was determined to be the heart of the Immokalee community where revitalization efforts, as outlined in this plan, should be focused. The CBD consists of the SR 29 corridor from 9th Street at the west end, to East 2nd Street at the east end; and the South 1st Street corridor from Pine Street on the north to the Seminole Casino on the south (shown as Subarea 3 on Figure 2). The CBD is ap-proximately 230 acres and contains the area com-monly referred to as “downtown” or “main street.” Several characteristics make the CBD the most logical area for streetscape improvements and branding, as well as make it key in the efforts to attract new business, redevelopment, and eco-nomic activity to Immokalee. The CBD is the his-toric downtown core; it is centrally located to the rest of town and contains commercial uses and buildings framing the street. SR 29 widens to four lanes at 9th Street, thereby creating a sense of arrival into the district. The MSTU has already installed several streetscape improvements in this area, including paver sidewalks, bike racks, plant-ers, and benches, all of which help to promote the area as the heart of social activity. The area is compact and easily walkable (requiring no more than 20 minutes to walk from one end to the other) and already has a significant amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. In addition, govern-ment and institutional services are concentrated in this area and are attractors for social activity. Finally, the creation of the Central Business Dis-trict will be a way to connect downtown with the Seminole Casino. This connection will help draw visitors into the downtown area and will capitalize on the Casino as a significant tourist destination. The following discussion relates to the CBD only; however, descriptions of land uses and conditions within Subareas 1, 2, and 4 are included in the Appendix A of this report for comparison and re-view. PAGE 9 DRAFT Figure 2. Boundaries of the Study Area PAGE 10 DRAFT B. Character The term “public realm” as used in this plan in-cludes both traditionally defined public space, such as public plazas, as well as public space encompassed within road right-of-way, spe-cifically that of SR 29 and 1st Street. Converting a road into viable public space entails several challenges. One relates to atmosphere: a road, especially a state road, is not designed to reflect or emphasize the character of a community. In Immokalee, this issue has been some-what addressed through the efforts of the Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU). The MSTU was estab-lished undertake beautification improvements such as roadway landscaping, including distinctive blue light poles, and in the down-town area, paver side-walks, seating areas with planters, blue bike racks, and blue trash cans. These improve-ments are found in “bump-outs” located at the end of each block on Main Street, from 9th Street to 1st Street. Another challenge in utilizing right-of-way as public space is the inherent conflict between automo-biles and pedestrians or bicyclists. SR 29 and South 1st Street connect Immokalee with the rest of Collier County and the state. The pass-through traffic along these roadways offers an important revenue genera-tion potential; however, the high levels of automobile and truck traffic can present a hazard to pedestrians and bicyclists. Numerous accidents have attracted the attention of County and State transportation offi-cials. Collier County recently performed a road safety audit (RSA) to identify safety improvements to land-scaping and medians. A copy of the audit results is included in Appendix B of this report. Roads de-signed to maximize traffic volume and operational efficiency typically provide little consideration to the pedestrian and bicyclist experience and rarely pro-vide accommodations for those users. To achieve a successful integration between motorized and non-motorized traffic, drivers must be alerted to the fact that they will be sharing the roadway, and made aware of where to expect interactions with other modes of travel. 1. Roadway Section Given that the roadways create the corridor and define the public realm, a description of the corri-dor’s character must begin with a description of the roads. West and north of 9th Street, SR 29 is a two-lane facility with a middle turn-lane, con-structed without curb or gutter. The right-of-way width for this portion of SR 29 is 200 feet, as origi-nally platted with the design and construction of SR 29 in the 1940’s. This is comparable to right-of-way reservations for some sections of I-75 in Col-lier County. Four-foot concrete sidewalks are lo-cated adjacent to the road along both sides of SR 29 from Lake Trafford to Immokalee Road; how-ever, from Immokalee Road to south of the curve, there is a sidewalk on the west side only, except for a small portion of sidewalk on the east side in Existing beautification improvement banners. Public garbage receptacles. Distinctive blue light poles. Blue signalization poles. PAGE 11 DRAFT front of the Popeye’s restaurant. Additional sidewalk segments have been constructed on parcels with new construction, creating a sec-ond sidewalk, closer to the building. East of 9th Street, SR 29 becomes a four-lane road, with sidewalks on both sides, land-scaped medians, and curb and gutter. It re-mains a four-lane road through the rest of the study area. Interestingly, although the road widens for this section, the right-of-way de-creases, from 200 feet to 100 feet. South 1st Street is built with curb and gutter throughout the CBD, and the right-of-way width averages 100 feet. Four-foot concrete sidewalks have also been constructed and are located, in most instances, directly adjacent to the roadway. Figure 3. Right-of-Way Typical Sections PAGE 12 DRAFT 2. Gateways The MSTU also constructed gateways to welcome folks into Immokalee and to clearly delineate town limits. There is a north “entrance,” at SR 29 and New Market Road West. There is also a gateway on South 1st Street, just north of the Seminole Casino. Both of these gateways are identified through a brick monument sign that features a carved wood sign. The scale of both signs is typical of entrance signage used for residential subdivisions. Entrance Sign on SR 29 at New Market Road Examples of impermanent signage. PAGE 13 DRAFT 3. Distinguishing Elements Certain elements are consistent throughout the corri-dor. Though not intentional design features, they do reflect the current state of the corridor. One element is signage, which tends to be informal and imperma-nent. The amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic also distinguishes Immokalee from coastal Collier County. Car ownership in Immokalee is significantly lower than the rest of the county and the state as a whole. This leads to increased pedestrian and bicycle ac-tivity which is often lacking in many other communi-ties trying to revitalize their downtown. Another interesting feature that characterizes Immo-kalee is an element that has all but disappeared from many urban locations—the pay phone. These distinguishing physical characteristics, while probably manifestations of current socio-economic conditions in Immokalee, certainly contribute to the existing character of the CBD. Pedestrian activity within the CBD. Prevalence of pay phones - an element that has practically disappeared from the urban landscape. PAGE 14 DRAFT B. Current Land Use One way to analyze existing conditions is to look at existing land use, which refers to the type of uses cur-rently found on the ground today. “Land use” in this sense is not a regulatory description, but rather a way to analyze current conditions in the study area. The CBD contains approximately 228 acres within 505 par-cels. The most common land use is residential (single-family residential, multi-family residential, and mobile home and RV parks, 42%), followed by vacant land (30%), and commercial uses (15%), as shown in Fig-ure 4, Current Land Use Exhibit, and Table 1 Current Land Uses in the CBD. Figure 5 on page 16 depicts an aerial of the CBD, with photographs illustrating typical development, num-bered 1-12. While a large portion of the CBD is com-prised of residential uses, there is a more consistent presence of commercial properties along SR 29 in this area than elsewhere in Immokalee, especially east of 5th Street. Buildings in this portion of the corridor are essentially located adjacent to the road right-of-way, typical of a more urban roadway cross-section. The area east of 9th Street also has characteristics more typical of a “downtown;” that is, wider sidewalks, benches, bicycle racks, street trees, and on-street parking. However, there is an obvious lack of shade cover which should be an important public realm de-sign consideration for southwest Florida communities. Given the extreme heat and rain during the summer months, addressing those elements through design is necessary in creating a comfortable pedestrian experi-ence. The following maps and discussion highlight existing development by type (commercial, institu-tional, residential, etc.) 4%10%5%6%7%2%34%5%5%22%AgricultureCommercialGovernmentIndustrialInstitutionalMobile Home or Recreational Vehicle ParkSingle-family ResidentialMulti-family ResidentialRoadwaysTable 1. Current Land Uses in the CBD Current Land Uses Land Use Parcel Count Percent Acres Percentage Agriculture 0 0.0% 0.00 0.0% Commercial 75 14.9% 33.44 14.6% Government 4 0.8% 7.90 3.5% Institutional 24 4.8% 16.34 7.2% Mobile Home or RV Park 4 0.8% 5.35 2.3% Single-family Residential 245 48.5% 63.87 28.0% Multi-family Residential 35 6.9% 25.66 11.2% Roadways 1 0.2% 7.13 3.1% Vacant Land 117 23.2% 68.62 30.1% Total 505 100.0% 228.31 100.0% Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, February 2009; Analysis RWA, Inc. PAGE 15 DRAFT Figure 4. Immokalee Current Land Use Exhibit PAGE 16 DRAFT Figure 5. Central Business District Aerial PAGE 17 DRAFT 1. Commercial Uses Commercial properties make up 15 percent of the CBD, a relatively small percentage for a busi-ness district; however, the majority of land di-rectly abutting SR 29 and 1st Street is zoned for commercial use. Structures are generally older, having been built in the 1960’s and 70’s. The condition of these buildings varies from well-maintained to a state of disrepair. Most of the buildings have flat or mansard roofs. The buildings, however, commonly have fenes-tration facing the street, as well as entrances fac-ing the public realm (see Photo 12 on Figure 5). Site landscaping is sparse. Additional photo-graphs are included on the following page to further illustrate existing structures in the CBD. Most commercial buildings range in height from 10 to 15 feet. The Azteca building at the north-west corner of 2nd Street and Main Street, at 20-25 feet high, is an exception. There is no typical color palette for buildings. Street landscaping is predominantly palm trees and low shrubbery. Figure 6. Central Business District Commercial Uses PAGE 18 DRAFT Limited commercial uses are located along 1st Street, north of Main Street, including a recently completed building, Lucy’s Hair Salon (Photo 3 on Figure 5). Other commercial properties have industrial-type metal buildings, with limited or no fenestration, mini-mal landscaping, and industrial features such as overhead doors. This style of building is clearly not pedestrian-scaled or typical of a central business district. Examples of existing commercial uses along Main Street. PAGE 19 DRAFT 2. Institutional & Government Uses Institutional and government uses represent 10 percent of the CBD, and are important attractors for the district. Two of only three new buildings in the CBD house institutional uses: the Rollason Center and the Pace Center for Girls (Lucy’s Hair Salon is the other). These recently constructed buildings have incorporated design features re-quired by the Collier County Architectural Design Guidelines, such as the cupola. Government uses are also located in this area, including the Immokalee Government Center at the southeast corner of Main Street and 1st Street. There is also a small historic site, a 19th-century cemetery, located directly on SR 29. Figure 7. Central Business District Institutional & Government Uses PAGE 20 DRAFT Institutional/Government buildings - Rollason Center above; Pace Center for Girls below. Historic site - 19th century cemetery along SR29. PAGE 21 DRAFT 3. Residential Uses Residential uses make up over 40 percent of the district. While this may seem like a large percent-age and uncommon for most revitalizing down-towns, residential uses provide a significant oppor-tunity for the CBD. Residential uses put people on the street, which supports commercial uses, pro-motes bicycle and pedestrian traffic, and contrib-utes to a vibrant community. However, there are single-family and multi-family units directly on SR 29 and South 1st Street, in areas zoned for com-mercial use. These existing residences provide challenges in developing a central business dis-trict, but over time, these uses can be redeveloped into commercial or mixed-use buildings which would be consistent with the vision for the area and would yield the highest and best use for the prop-erty owners. Generally, the residential uses consist of smaller, single-family units, on small lots. Many of these lots were platted in the 1920’s and 30’s. Some lots are as small as 3,250 square feet, less than the minimum lot size allowed by zoning. These small lot sizes may hinder redevelopment, as required setbacks and landscaping can be diffi-cult to accommodate on a substandard lot, and essentially act as a disincentive to owners to make improvements. Small lot sizes can also deter large-scale development, as the land needed for the project may have multiple own-ers, thereby increasing the time and costs asso-ciated with assembling the property. There are several trailer and mobile homes parks within the in the neighborhoods north and south of SR 29, of which, many are in disrepair, There are four affordable housing projects in the CBD, 1.) Main Street Village (79 units), 2.) Oakhaven (160 units), 3.) the Farmworker Dormitory Complex (192 beds), and 4.) the Milagro Place affordable housing subdivision, developed by the Empowerment Alliance of South-west Florida, which consists of 26 single-family homes. Both Main Street Village and Oakhaven are fenced off with a wide ditch surrounding the property. There is a relatively large concentration of affordable housing developments, which highlights a major dif-ference between Immokalee and coastal Collier County. Although only 7.6 percent of the County’s total population resides in Immokalee, 43 percent of the affordable housing projects are located within Immokalee. Other multifamily properties are illus-trated on page 23. Typical local road within a residential neighborhood. PAGE 22 DRAFT Figure 8. Central Business District Residential Uses PAGE 23 DRAFT 4. Vacant Lots There are several vacant parcels and buildings in this area, which, while representing opportunities for new development, currently interrupt the pedes-trian experience and detract from the downtown atmosphere. Over 30 percent of the land in the CBD is currently vacant. Except for a small, two-block segment from 1st Street to 3rd Street, there is no cohesive or consistent structural element front-ing the sidewalks along the corridor, due to vacant parcels, abandoned buildings, inconsistent set-backs, and inconsistent parking placement Examples of housing stock within the CBD. PAGE 24 DRAFT Figure 9. Central Business District Vacant Lots PAGE 25 DRAFT The south end of the study area at South 1st Street and Carver Street represents the southern entrance into downtown from coastal Collier County. The Seminole Casino is on the east side of the road (outside of the Study Area), and there is a gas station and small store on the west side of the road (see Photo 10 on Figure 5). A mixture of commercial and residential uses border South 1st Street, both single-family and multifamily structures, as well as several vacant parcels and buildings. The mixture of uses, and the lack of design consistency, results in confu-sion about the nature of the district and does not give any visual signal or reference that one is en-tering a central business district or a possible tourist destination. Examples of residential and commercial structures along South 1st Street. PAGE 26 DRAFT C. Built Environment The following series of maps more closely detail the built environment within the CBD and how these conditions relate to public health and safety, as well as their affect on redevelopment. 1. Pedestrian Amenities Sidewalks As previously discussed, many Immokalee resi-dents , especially those living within the CBD, bike or walk rather than drive to their destinations. Fig-ure 10 depicts a five-minute walk (quarter-mile) from three key locations – the Seminole Casino at South 1st Street and Eustis Avenue; the intersec-tion of 1st Street and Main Street; and the intersec-tion of 9th Street and Main Street. The latter two intersections represent “bookends” to the CBD, and are the proposed locations for two new public plazas, which are described and discussed in greater detail further in the report. The map illus-trates the location of sidewalks and crosswalks within the CBD. As demonstrated, the CBD is eas-ily walkable, no more than 20 minutes (one mile) from the Casino to 9th Street. A public parking facil-ity is being considered for the intersection of 9th Street and Main Street, in the northeast corner. As can be seen from Figure 10, there are side-walks along major roadways; however, sidewalks along secondary streets leading into core neighborhoods north and south of the CBD are incomplete or lacking. It should be understood that the lack of sidewalk facilities identified on the map is not reflective of the actual pedestrian traffic in Immokalee. Existing pedestrian traffic and de-mand for sidewalks is significant, but supply of Figure 10. Pedestrian Facilities PAGE 27 DRAFT such facilities lags behind. The lack of sidewalks has led to improvised footpaths and unsafe condi-tions where individuals walk within narrow, paved shoulders. These conditions represent a deficiency in the pedestrian network, but also provide an easily-identified opportunity to improve mobility and safety within the CBD. Crosswalks Crosswalks are another key component to a safe pe-destrian system. The Florida Department of Transpor-tation (FDOT) recently added two crosswalks along Main Street These cross walks are located along Main Street at the intersection of 5th Street, and mid-block between 6th and 7th Streets. There are several crosswalks along South 1st Street; however they are faded, poorly marked, and have minimal signage as-sociated with them. Additionally, none of the cross-walks are linked to a traffic light, therefore pedestrians using the crosswalk must rely on the awareness and responsiveness of drivers for their safety. As previ-ously stated, the mix of uses, inconsistent setbacks, and building types fail to alert the driver to the fact they are entering a downtown area, with associated pedes-trian activity. The crosswalk in front of the Casino es-pecially needs improvement, as overflow parking for the Casino is located across South 1st Street which leads to significant pedestrian traffic crossing back and forth. Additionally, there is no sidewalk in front of the Casino. According to a recent road safety audit conducted by the Collier County Community Traffic Safety Team, the majority of pedestrian and bicycle crashes in the CBD occur within two roadway seg-ments, on Main Street/SR 29 from 1st Street to 9th Street, and along South 1st Street from Main Street/SR 29 south to the Seminole Casino. This audit suggests possible changes to existing landscap-ing and medians in order to improve safety. These recommendations were closely analyzed and in-corporated into the proposed CBD streetscape design. In addition, Collier County is also investi-gating the feasibility of installing a stoplight with crosswalk in front of the Seminole Casino. Example of properly identified crosswalk within Immokalee. Example of jaywalking resulting from lack of crosswalks. Crosswalk in front of casino - markings are faded and signage is lacking. PAGE 28 DRAFT 2. Building Uses and Form The following map (Figure 11) illustrates the buildings and current land uses that border SR 29 and South1st Street. Again, the two parks/plazas, as well as the Semi-nole Casino, are shown for reference. As the map illus-trates, the majority of uses along the corridor are com-mercial; however, institutional, government, and even single-family residential uses are also present. While residential uses are not necessarily out of place in a CBD, it is atypical to have an extensive amount of single family residences directly abutting the public right-of-way. These areas are typically zoned for commercial uses and represent prime real estate for redevelopment. Within most downtowns, it is more common for residential units to be housed within mixed-use buildings or to be further removed from “main street” behind a row of commercial or institutional uses. However, residential use can be effectively integrated into the public realm and into a unified main street design scheme. It is common for redevelopment efforts to establish a “build to line” directly abutting the public right-of-way to en-sure that buildings frame the public realm and pro-vide a unified visual delineation between public spaces and private development. When existing residential buildings do not directly abut the public right-of-way, a technique often used to ensure uni-form frontage is to mandate that a fence or wall be used for continuity. Figure 11 also illustrates the strong presence of commercial buildings along Main Street, and the number of buildings that directly abut the right-of-way. From 5th Street to 1st Street, commercial buildings “frame” the public realm and few gaps in the store frontage can be observed. This ex-hibit also depicts the large expanses where Figure 11. Building Uses Along Main Street & 1st Street Corridor PAGE 29 DRAFT Figure 12. Transit Routes frontage is lacking. From 9th to 5th Streets, and along most of 1st Street, building size and loca-tion represent typical suburban, auto-dependent development, with more of the parcel devoted to parking, and buildings set back further from the street. For example, the Government Center, at the southeast corner of Main Street and 1st, is located approximately 70 feet from South 1st Street. These setbacks, in addition to consider-able variations in the “massing” of buildings, can be significant visual detractors that present chal-lenges in establishing a cohesive and attractive public realm. 3. Transit Public transit represents another key element to a pedestrian-friendly downtown. Figure 12 shows current Collier Area Transit (CAT) routes in Immo-kalee. Route 5, the Immokalee Shuttle, runs from the Health Department in Immokalee to the Gov-ernment Center in Naples; Route 7, the Marco Island Shuttle runs from North 19th Street to Cax-ambas Park in Marco Island; and Route 8, the Immokalee Circulator, runs within Immokalee. The Public Realm Area is well-served by both Examples of bus stops in Immokalee - minimal accommodation for transit rider. PAGE 30 DRAFT Route 5 and Route 8, with bus stops being no more than a mile from any location within the area. Bus stops are provided at several locations along each route, however, the number of bus stops could be increased and the quality of these bus tops could be en-hanced. 4. Access Drives Limiting conflicts amongst drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists is important in creating a pedes-trian-friendly downtown. Currently, there are sev-eral curb-cuts along SR 29 and South 1st Street that accommodate private driveways. While the arrangement makes sense from an ease of ac-cess standpoint, such multiple curb-cuts have two major drawbacks. 1.) For motorists, it in-creases turning movement conflicts and re-duces travel speed. 2.) For pedestrians, each driveway represents a potential conflict with a motor vehicle. For these reasons, the CRA should explore the development of an access management plan that could provide incentives for the development of shared access points, and shared parking with cross access ease-ments behind buildings that front the public realm. Figures 13 and 14 demonstrate how access for one sample block, on the south side of Main Street, from 6th Street to 4th Street, is currently configured, and how that access could be potentially reconfigured by incorporating a joint access easement as redevelopment oc-curs. Figure 13. Multiple Access Drives, Existing Parking Conditions PAGE 31 DRAFT Figure 14. Potential Access Drive & Parking Improvements PAGE 32 DRAFT 5. Drainage Unfortunately, the CBD, along with many areas in Immokalee, currently experiences significant flooding issues during rainy periods. A Stormwa-ter Master Plan for Immokalee was completed in 2006. The Plan identified areas prone to flooding and recommended improvements to remediate a number of problems. The plan was recently adopted by the Board of County Commissioners, which will allow the CRA to refine and finalize the plan and move forward with needed stormwater improvements. A review of the plan in relation to the public realm study area is included in Ap-pendix A. A copy of the entire plan has also been included on CD. As part of the Stormwater Master Plan, a model was developed to simulate existing and future drainage conditions based on varying stormwater infrastructure conditions. An existing conditions model was created based on current develop-ment within Immokalee, and future conditions were then modeled by adding various drainage improvements such as pipes, weirs, retention ponds, etc. However, the model did not simulate changes in land use that may result from redevel-opment and new development — for instance, a change from of agricultural land to commercial land would not be addressed by this model. More stringent water quality and quantity stan-dards will be required for new development rather than existing development, and the impact of fu-ture development is anticipated to result in posi-tive improvements to stormwater management. However, future development may need evalua-tion and simulation to determine the effect on the conveyance, storage, and water quality treatment aspects of the stormwater management system. Additionally, in the review of new development, new stormwater improvements and how they in-terface with existing stormwater management systems and the overall drainage pattern will need to be considered. Within the CBD, proposed improvements consist of: a. 48” pipes along Delaware, Colorado, and Boston Avenues running east and west; b. a series of 18-inch exfiltration trenches on various streets running north and south; c. a weir control structure at 5th Street and Be-thune Drive; and d. a 2-acre lake at the intersection of South 9th Street and Eustis Avenue. One of the most beneficial improvements to the CBD is the proposed two-acre stormwater reten-tion pond. Within the Stormwater Master Plan, this pond is located just south of Colorado Ave-nue and west of South 9th Street. The stormwater facility provides the most immediate and viable stormwater management improvement for water quality treatment and water quantity storage. In addition, it could serve as a catalyst for redevel-opment in this area, by providing an aesthetically pleasing amenity, passive recreation benefits, and by possibly accepting water from infill devel-opment, thus reducing the need for private prop-erty owners to manage all their water onsite. It is recommended that the lake improvement be ex-pedited, since it has the potential to provide great benefit to the Immokalee CRA, both in sig-nificant improvements to stormwater control downtown and as a possible park site. 1 This stormwater lake is shown as two acres on the associated graphics included in the stormwater report; however, it is listed in the text as five acres. We have as-sumed that two acres is the correct figure. PAGE 33 DRAFT Figure 15. Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan Area 6 Improvements PAGE 34 DRAFT D. Challenges & Opportunities The existing conditions in the CBD are discussed to illustrate the challenges and opportunities that face redevelopment initiatives in Immokalee, and specifi-cally to illustrate how some of the challenges will be addressed and opportunities capitalized upon through the implementation of the Public Realm Plan. The large amount of pedestrian and bicycle traffic represents both a challenge and an opportunity. The safety of pedestrians and bicyclists must be ad-dressed to prevent accidents and eliminate pedestrian fatalities. In doing so, proposed improvements can also enhance walkability and liveability within the CBD. The Public Realm Plan recognizes that there is a very significant amount of non-motorized travel throughout Immokalee and especially within the CBD, and pro-poses streetscape improvements, as well as new crosswalks to improve safety and the overall pedes-trian and cyclist experience. The plan intends to implement a new vision for Immo-kalee, and presents a cohesive design that will clearly demonstrate the town’s multicultural heritage and cre-ate a unique sense of place. The public plazas will act as the center of social activity and become assets for the community. Implementation of the plan will also lead to greater interest in Immokalee as a tourist desti-nation, by better connecting the Seminole Casino with the CBD and expanding the tourist destination from a single building to an entire district. The plan is in-tended to provide a catalyst for redevelopment of the CBD. Significant public investment, in addition to nu-merous CRA initiatives , will be utilized to stimulate private investment and help revitalize Immokalee. PAGE 35 DRAFT Branding The design of the public realm can enhance or even create the unique character of a destination. The per-sonality of a central business district can be made memorable through the design of this community environment. The elements of design used to create a unique brand or image for Immokalee are based on the rich cultural heritages that have given Immokalee its essence. These cultural influences include an agrarian heritage of citrus and crop farms and cattle ranching. Additionally, Immo-kalee’s cultural influences include a diverse ethnic mix of Mexican, Guatemalan, South American, and Caribbean cultures. These cultural heritages are embraced in the gate-ways, wayfinding signage, Main Street streetscape concept, and the two public plaza concepts. The multi-cultural theme is expressed through the various shapes and functions of the plazas, the architectural elements, the landscape architecture, the vibrant color palettes, energetic geometric patterns, and natural materials. The colors, shapes, and de-signs of Immokalee’s heritage have been inte-grated into the public realm elements, from single ceramic tiles to an entire Main Street streetscape with public plazas at each end. The use of colorful decorative tiles, as proposed for Immokalee, is prevalent in Latin American pla-zas and streetscapes. They add vibrancy and color to walls, columns, steps, benches, planters and fountains. There is an enormous range and diversity of styles available. Local artists could also be solicited to create custom mosaics and hand-painted tiles. The brand for Immokalee is first introduced to visi-tors by the predominant gateways that lead into the CBD and the Community Redevelopment Area. Additional wayfinding signage introduces the theme and directs tourists throughout the com-munity. This section identifies the proposed gate-ways and wayfinding system for the Immokalee community. III. Branding PAGE 36 DRAFT A. Proposed Gateways Although the focus of the public realm plan is the CBD, the branding actually begins beyond the boundaries of the CBD to introduce tourists to the unique identity of Immokalee. Gateways must be strategically located and designed at a scale that is appropriate for the in-tended user, whether that is predominantly pedestri-ans, bicyclists, or motorists, and must be related to the right-of-way and speed of travel. Immokalee currently has two existing entrance gate-ways that utilize a cornucopia logo. These gateways are strategically located for traffic arriving from Fort Myers and Naples, but do not capture the spirit of Im-mokalee, and their scale is not appropriate for the lo-cations or traffic speed. It is recommended that these two gateways be redesigned to incorporate the new design theme. This plan also identifies several strate-gic locations for new gateways. In addition, new gateways are proposed for entry into the community from the southwest along SR 29. More pedestrian and bicycle-scale gateways are also pro-posed to announce entry into the CBD. The proposed locations for the redesign and new gateways include the following: Pedestrian Scale Monument Gateways • The intersection of Main Street and 1st Street – Public Plaza • The intersection of Main Street and 9th Street – Public Plaza and Park Motorist Scale Monument Gateways • The intersection of SR 29 and New Market Road W – Large Entry Monument Redesign • The intersection of 1st Street near the Seminole Casino Immokalee – Small Entry Monument Redesign • Along CR 846 29 near the airport – Small or Large Entry Monument (dependent on avail-able right-of-way width) • SR 29 at the Farm Workers Village – signage on the existing pedestrian bridge The proposed locations for the above gateways are illustrated in Figure 16. According to the 2009 Road Safety Audit (RSA) commissioned by the Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU), “Gateways help calm traffic move-ments and provide a visual queue [sic] to drivers to expect higher pedestrian traffic.” Therefore, the use of gateways at the proposed locations will potentially increase pedestrian safety. Additional information on both public plazas is included in the next section of this report. PAGE 37 DRAFT Figure 16. Gateway Location Map PAGE 38 DRAFT 4. SR 29 Pedestrian Bridge The existing pedestrian bridge located by the Farm Workers Village may serve as the perfect framework for announcing the entrance into the Immokalee area. The logo of the Immokalee CRA, with its large colorful letters, would be recom-mended for this gateway in order to make the largest impact and clearly identify the community. 1. Central Business District Gateway Columns To create an identity for the CBD along Main Street, pedestrian/bicycle scale gateways are pro-posed to clearly establish each end of the District. These gateways are proposed as tall, narrow col-umns to prevent sidewalk conflicts for pedestrians. In Approaching the CBD, visitors’ and residents’ attention will be drawn to the prominent gateway columns. The colorful masonry columns are pro-posed at eight to ten-feet tall and feature a stylized fruit basket or sphere finial. With their bold colors, geometric patterns, and ceramic tiles, the colorful columns will enliven the gateway. The graphic sketches on page 39 provide conceptual illustra-tions of the example gateway columns. 2. Large Entry Monument Large gateways are proposed for entry from SR 29 into the CRA, which has a substantial right-of-way at both the north and south entrances. The design proposes a pair of impressive columns flanking a large monument sign in the center landscaped median. These monuments, united in style and color, will provide a bold entrance into Immokalee. They feature masonry construction finished in bold-colored stucco and accented with bright ceramic tiles. The sign area itself is a field of ceramic tiles with a welcoming message and custom artwork. A large Talavera pot in bright colors completes the ensemble. Although the focal point plant will be drought-tolerant, a drip irrigation system is pro-posed in order to reduce maintenance. Figure 18. Small Entry Monument Elevation 3. Small Entry Monument In areas of reduced rights-of-way, large entry monu-ments are not possible. In these locations, an im-pressive entry monument may still be created by maximizing the proportionate height of the struc-ture. Similar to the large entry monument, the smaller version features masonry construction fin-ished in bold-colored stucco and accented with bright ceramic tiles. A pair of Talavera pots in bright colors flanks the monument and softens the vertical mass of the backdrop. Figure 17. Large Entry Monument Elevation Pedestrian overpass at Farmworkers Village. PAGE 39 DRAFT Figure 19. Gateway Columns (for Proposed Plazas) -Depicting cornucopia or sphere finial, as well as design elements such as mosaic tiles, bright colors, and Latin-influenced patterns. PAGE 40 DRAFT B. Wayfinding Signage Wayfinding and directional signs provide a needed information and direction system to guide tourists and pedestrians safely and effi-ciently in and around the CBD. Directional signs, like the Vehicular Directional Sign shown to the right, are strategically placed to offer pe-destrian and vehicular traffic quick help at inter-sections and key crossroads. Wayfinding signs, like the pedestrian directory below, can provide landmark names and direc-tional arrows that indicate the direction of travel to a particular landmark. These could be placed in the two gateway plazas and in key bump-outs along Main Street. Pedestrian directories are critical to Immokalee due to heavy pedestrian and bicycle traffic that exists. Both the pedes-trian directory and vehicular directional signs can employ multiple listing signs with change-able panels. The cohesive wayfinding system has been developed such that the signage ap-pearance and theme are consistent throughout the entire area, which allows the signs to be eas-ily recognizable by pedestrians and motorists. The following illustrates two examples of wayfind-ing signage proposed for the Immokalee area. As redevelopment efforts move forward, a com-prehensive wayfinding program for the entire Immokalee Urban Area should be defined. However, it is suggested that the implementation of the wayfinding program begin with the CBD and that strategic sign locations and points of interest be identified. This effort will require input from the CRA staff, the and the CRA Advisory Board. The strategic locations should be based upon ease of visibility to motorists and pedestri-ans, and the signs should provide an organized offering of information and directions that are quick to read and easy to understand. Four strategic locations have been identified within the CBD: 1. Along South Main Street, in front of the Casino 2. At the intersection of 1st and Main, where the public plaza is proposed 3. At the crosswalk located at the intersection of Main and 5th Street 4. At the intersection of Main and 9th Street, where the Public Plaza/Park is proposed Additionally, a preliminary list of landmarks that could be identified on the signs is provided below: • Airport • Tradeport Business Park • Casino • Lake Trafford/Marina • Roberts Ranch • Pepper Ranch • Pinhookers Market • State Farmers Market • Community Parks • Schools • University of Florida facilities • Public Plazas • Public Parking (future) • Rollason Center • Immokalee Government Services Center • Immokalee Career and Service Center Figure 21. Vehicular Direction Sign Figure 20. Pedestrian Directory Figures 20 and 21 illustrate two examples of wayfinding signage proposed for the Immokalee area. PAGE 41 DRAFT Conceptual layouts were created for two plazas at the recommended locations within the Immo-kalee CRA. One public plaza is proposed at the intersection of 1st Street and Main Street. An-other plaza is proposed at the intersection of 9th Street and Main Street. Combined with gate-ways, the plazas become functional “book-ends” to define the geographic limits of the defined Immokalee CBD along Main Street. The con-ceptual layouts for each plaza area are based on site visit information, interviews, direction from the CRA, and feedback from Immokalee CRA staff. Public Plaza Designs Currently, there are no plazas or great squares for public gatherings in downtown Immokalee. Public gathering places, such as Zócalos in Mexico, are the heart of the Mexican-Tenochtitlan community, and are often an-chored by a church or market place. In Immokalee, such plazas are intended to inspire community pride and revitalize the CBD into a more livable and walkable com-munity; and are proposed as anchors for the CBD. IV. Public Plaza Designs Figure 22. Plaza Locations PAGE 42 DRAFT A. Proposed 1st Street Plaza First Street is a primary entrance to Immokalee from the Naples area, the new Ave Maria community, and the Seminole Indian Reservation surrounding the expanding casino. There are two vacant lots at the intersection of North 1st Street and Main Street, with one lot at the northeast intersection quadrant and the other lot at the northwest intersection quadrant. The area of both lots totals approximately 54,660 square feet (1.25 acres). From an analysis of the aerial to the right, there appears evidence of heavy pedestrian circulation crossing the lot on the northwest corner. The County’s Road Safety Audit recommended pur-chasing this vacant lot and constructing a diagonal walkway from 1st Street to Main Street. However, the Public Realm Plan recommends a plaza for each parcel that will be more beneficial to the entire CBD rather than just a diagonal sidewalk. The conceptual design for the 1st Street plaza shown on the following page includes the use of both vacant lots on the north side of Main Street. For special public events, 1st Street could temporarily be closed north of Main Street. This would allow for both 1st Street plaza areas to function as one large public space. For larger events, a temporary stage could be set up on the closed section of 1st Street. The primary plaza space is the “street level” plaza east and west of 1st Street. The “middle” and “upper” terraces step up from the street level plaza in the interior of the space and slope upward from the perimeter of the plaza. Pedestrian accessibility is provided to the upper levels of both plazas. As previously mentioned, gateway columns on either side of 1st Street are used to identify “downtown” Immo-kalee. They incorporate the design colors and names of the plazas. Similarly, bollards are used for safety by defining areas and perimeters. They are proposed on the north side of Main Street and on both sides of 1st Street to identify the edges of the corner plaza. In keeping with the colorful multicultural theme, the same site furnishings and paving proposed for the Main Street streetscape concept can be used in the plazas. The plaza design also includes art walls, which represent a novel feature of this plaza design. The all has built-in openings for the display of art. The wall has built-in openings where art can be displayed. The art wall can be used to display local or touring artwork. Local artists could be encouraged to develop works of art as part of a competition, special event, or fund raiser. The use of porous paving or permeable pavers in the plazas will promote stormwater infiltration and groundwater re-charge. They also offer a “cooler” pavement system Decorative art elements. that reduces the heat island effect. Rainwater harvesting is possible if the stormwater runoff is held and recycled in the irrigation system. More detail about the 1st Street Plaza can be found in a detailed PowerPoint presentation include in Appen-dix B. This presentation provides additional exhibits depicting design elements proposed for this plaza. PAGE 43 DRAFT Figure 23. 1st Street Plaza PAGE 44 DRAFT B. Proposed 9th Street Plaza The development of a parcel on the southwest cor-ner of Main Street and 9th Street was identified and studied for location of the second anchor plaza and park area. The single ownership of the parcel makes it conducive for the plaza development. The parcel depth and location allows for the connection of resi-dential neighborhoods and a church to the Main Street corridor via the plaza area. The total area of the plaza and park is approximately 105,100 square feet (2.41 acres). A conceptual site plan for the pro-posed 9th Street plaza and park area is shown in the conceptual rendering on page 45. Colorful perimeter fencing is proposed at the cor-ner entrances to the park to showcase the Latin flavor of the design theme and to integrate unique features such as hand painted tiles. The fence style can introduce and reinforce a desired theme and color scheme. The linear border between fencing is open, yet well-landscaped. Permanent arbors and gazebos provide shade, as well as special-event tents. As shown, the tents will seat approximately 140 people banquet style and 182 people with an auditorium seating arrangement (Figure 25, photo 5). They may be installed as needed and do not need permanent posts for instal-lation. When not tented, the lawn may become a multi-purpose field to accommodate a number of different sporting events and other social activities. Other plaza amenities include a traditional fountain near Main Street, an amphitheater, an interactive fountain/splash pad, concession and restroom buildings, playground, and off-street parking. A bio-swale in between the parking bays can temporarily store, convey, and treat run-off from the parking lot. A rain garden off of Boston Avenue continues to treat the stormwater runoff by removing nutrients and suspended solids. The rain garden can be designed as an aesthetic and functional site feature. The intent of these features is to “clean” the water before it is reused or returned to the ecosystem. The use of porous paving or permeable pavers in the plazas will promote stormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge. They also offer a “cooler” pavement system, reducing the heat-island effect. Rainwater harvesting is possible when the stormwa-ter runoff is held and recycled in the irrigation system or used in decorative fountains. Harvested rainwater could also be used to flush toilets in the restrooms. More information about the 9th Street Plaza can be found in Appendix B. A Power Point presentation detailing design elements is included. Figure 24. Potential Fencing Alternatives PAGE 45 DRAFT Figure 25. 9th Street Plaza/Park PAGE 46 DRAFT plan, consisting of Phase 1 - the Intermediate Street-scape Concept Design, and Phase 2 - the Long-Range Streetscape Concept Design. The intermedi-ate design improvements can be completed immedi-ately or as existing streetscape must be replaced, thereby laying the foundation for the future long-term design. The long-term design would be implemented in conjunction with the establishment of the pro-posed SR 29 Loop Road. Once the SR 29 Loop Road is in place and trucks are no longer passing through the CBD, the long-term improvements can be safely implemented. Main Street/SR29 Streetscape An integrated and signature streetscape can enhance a community in many ways, and set the stage for a unique and vibrant downtown destination. When combined with a coordinated wayfinding and gate-way system, a unique brand or image for Immokalee will be created. A well-designed streetscape may also serve as a catalyst for economic development and strengthen the community’s sense of place. Immokalee is fortunate to already have a street-scape in place along much of 1st Street and SR 29. Streetscape and road corridor improvements along Main Street/SR 29 within the CBD have been an ongoing project for the Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU)/Beautification Committee. Improve-ments previously implemented by the MSTU in-clude median landscaping, streetlights, bump-outs, and site furnishings. The conceptual streetscape renovations proposed as part of the Plan will build upon and complement the existing streetscape framework and previous accom-plishments of the MSTU. The streetscape renova-tions proposed as part of this plan will accomplish two community objectives: A. Increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety on Main Street. B. Unite proposed public plazas at 1st Street and 9th Street with a shared multi-cultural theme along Main Street. The conceptual streetscape design for SR 29/Main Street is proposed to be completed in a two-phase VII. Main Street/SR29 Streetscape Aerial depicting typical segment used to develop conceptual streetscape design. PAGE 47 DRAFT Figure 26. Intermediate Streetscape Concept PAGE 48 DRAFT A. Increase Pedestrian & Bicyclist Safety A high number of pedestrian and bicycle crashes and fatalities have occurred over the past years on Main Street (3 pedestrian/bike fatalities, 16 injuries from 2005-2007). In 2008, this prompted Collier County to perform a Road Safety Audit (RSA). The findings and recommendations of the MSTU-commissioned RSA have been incorporated in the development of these streetscape concepts. Ex-amples of this include enhanced crosswalk paving, reduction of mid-block crossing opportunities, re-duction of cross-sidewalk vehicle access, the addi-tion of dedicated bike lanes, and the use of land-scaped “bump-outs” to reduce vehicle speeds. B. Unite the Design Themes of the Two Plazas The proposed Main Street streetscape will serve to unite the design themes of the two public plazas at 1st Street and 9th Streets, previously discussed in this report. A two-block section of Main Street, from 1st to 3rd Streets, was chosen for the development of a prototype for the streetscape concepts. The street-scape design featured in this two-block prototype may be replicated elsewhere along Main Street. The conceptual streetscape is based on site visits, interviews, and direction and feedback from Immo-kalee residents and CRA staff. Again, two concep-tual streetscape plans have been created, one utiliz-ing the existing parallel parking (Intermediate Street-scape Concept Figure 26), and one that proposes reverse-angle parking (Long-Range Streetscape Concept). It should be noted that the proposed conceptual design can easily be extended beyond the boundaries described above. It is envisioned that streetscape improvements will eventually extend to the intersection of Lake Trafford Road to the north and the Casino to the south. Extending this design to the Casino is especially significant since it may help draw Casino visitors into the downtown. Figure 27. Illustration of Street “Bump-Outs” PAGE 49 DRAFT C. Phase 1- Intermediate Streetscape Concept The streetscape improvements recommended in this concept could be made without changing the existing lane widths on SR 29. The existing curbs will also remain in the same location, thereby avoiding the need to make significant infrastruc-ture modifications. See Figure 26. 1. Bump-Outs The existing bump-outs are moved closer to the street intersections, as recommended in the RSA (Figure 26). This will shorten the crossing distance for pedestrians and allow the crosswalks and vehicle stop bars to be moved toward Main Street to in-crease motorist visibility. The relocated bump-outs are elongated to increase landscape areas and allow planting of trees to shade the sidewalks. New mid-block bump-outs are also proposed to increase land-scape areas and increase tree canopy to shade the sidewalks. In addition, the widened bump-outs and tree canopy may potentially have the additional bene-fit of slowing vehicle speed along Main Street. Whenever trees are proposed in paved areas, a paver-grate is recommended to allow the tree to grow while also allowing pavement close to the trunk. The grate also protects the irrigation system (Figure 28). PAGE 50 DRAFT Figure 28. Intermediate Streetscape with Existing Parallel Parking Mid-Block Bump-out, Typical PAGE 51 DRAFT Figure 29. Long-Range Streetscape with Future Angled Parking Mid-Block Bump-out, Typical PAGE 52 DRAFT 2. Paving Glass pavers are proposed to replace the existing brick paving in the bump-outs and the utility channel in the sidewalk. These pavers will have a concrete base color compatible with the existing concrete pavement. Their bold colors come from the integra-tion of 100-percent recycled glass particles. An alternative paver system and material, playa pavers, has the same components as glass pavers, but with the addition of shell fragments to give a Car-ibbean look. Playa pavers are made from recycled materials, with only reclaimed shells used. Glass pavers and playa pavers are readily available and locally produced in Collier County. As an accent feature, beach and seaside pebbles may be incorporated into the sidewalk areas. The pebbles are installed in mortar to become a permanent paving feature. The pebbles add color and texture reminiscent of the Caribbean and Mexico. In the bump-outs, pebbles can be used to create textural bands around a field of glass pavers. They can also be used as accent pieces designed into the rhythm of the hardscape materials. To reclaim the full width of the existing sidewalk, the existing Foxtail Palms could be trans-planted to one of the plazas or another streetscape. The tree wells could be filled with concrete to match the exist-ing paving, thus eliminating the existing trip hazards men-tioned in the RSA. Playa pavers. Assorted pebbles. Glass pavers. PAGE 53 DRAFT 3. Crosswalks Crosswalks are proposed at the 1st Street intersec-tion, which is a recently designated this intersection for improvement by FDOT. A crosswalk has also been proposed at 2nd Street through the median. The crossing has the same elevation of the road to prevent tripping over the curb. This crosswalk was not in the FDOT recommendations, but was sug-gested in the Road Safety Audit. A laser crossing device is recommended for each new crosswalk, pending approval of these devices by FDOT for use on state roads. The sunburst pattern proposed for these cross-walks is imprinted directly into the existing as-phalt. The proposed product, DuraTherm, is ap-proved by FDOT for use on state roadways and is recommended for roads with heavy vehicular traf-fic. Installation of DuraTherm does not require extended road or lane closures; it can potentially be installed overnight, one lane at a time. See Figure 30. Figure 30. Streetscape Plan - 1st & Main Intersection PAGE 54 DRAFT Figure 31. Streetscape Plan - Median PAGE 55 DRAFT 4. Center Pavement Medallion A center medallion for the intersection of Main Street and 1st Street is proposed. The medallion , shown below, features a sunray pattern available from DuraTherm. In addition, the medallion may be left open or customized with the addition of a center logo or design as shown at the right. 5. Street Furniture Site furnishings are those “useful comfort items” that improve the safety, utility, and enjoyment of a space. The street furniture proposed in this section was chosen to complete and unify the multicultural streetscape theme. All of the proposed materials are durable mate-rials that require little or no maintenance. To avoid van-dalism, all of the proposed street furnishings should be secured to the paving with vandal-resistant screws. A. Benches The proposed benches feature colorful tile mosaics and durable masonry materials. The benches can be used to frame outdoor rooms or gathering spaces. The tile work carries the design themes from the two proposed plazas to the site furnishings. B. Bike Racks More bike racks are needed to accommodate the high volume of bicyclists downtown. Bike racks are proposed in each corner bump-out. Thus, four bike racks could be provided per block. A range of styles and locking options are available. The type or style of bike rack used can introduce and reinforce a theme and color scheme for the overall design. PAGE 56 DRAFT D. Ash and Trash Receptacles The proposed receptacles are made of a durable yet attractive cast concrete material, and are available in numerous colors to complement the color scheme of the bump-outs and the surrounding pottery. These receptacles are large and heavy and should stand up to strong winds. An optional rain dome is recom-mended to keep water out of the liner. The rain dome is secured to the receptacle by a cable. E. Bollards Bollards are used for safety by defining areas and perimeters and by providing physical barriers that protect pedestrians and cyclists. They are pro-posed on the north side of Main Street near 1st Street to identify the edge of the corner plaza. Bol-lards are also proposed to delineate each center landscape median. The tile work and colors of the bollards will carry the design themes along main street from one proposed plaza to the next. C. Pottery A variety of plant containers and pottery may be used to create visual interest and define spaces with foli-age. As with the benches and bike racks, the type or style of pottery used can introduce and reinforce a theme and color scheme for the overall design. For a colorful Mexican/South American theme, Mexican clay planters and Mexican Talavera are proposed. For a Caribbean theme, glazed pots in tropical colors and a wave motif would complement the streetscape. To prevent theft, pots can be easily secured using anchor bolts. When the pots are or-dered, an extra drain hole should be requested to ac-commodate installation of this bolt. A drip irrigation system can provide an efficient and low-maintenance method for watering the container plants. PAGE 57 DRAFT 6. Landscape The proposed plant pallet has been selected based on low-maintenance requirements, drought tolerance, and unique characteristics that contribute toward the overall multicultural theme. (Figure 31) A. Container Plants Choosing the right combination of plants for a container is critical. As shown in the chart be-low, there are several different plant combina-tions proposed for pots along Main Street. In keeping with the Mexican/South American tradi-tion, identical pots of the same plantings are repeated in a row to create rhythm in the land-scape. In each of these combinations, there is a taller, focal point or “thriller” plant; a colorful “filler” plant; and a “spiller,” to cascade flowers or foliage down the container. B. Groundcovers and Shrubs Low maintenance and drought-tolerant plants will add warm tropical colors along Main Street. If not over-watered, the ‘Helen Johnson’ Dwarf Bou-gainvillea will flower throughout most of the year. It is planted in a sweeping mass along the length of the median. Smaller pockets of Firecracker Plant and Cana Lilies enliven the colorful show. Potential Plant Species: • ‘Helen Johnson’ Dwarf Bougainvillea • Asiatic Jasmine • Lantana • Muhly Grass • ‘Tropicanna’ Canna • Saw Palmetto • Firecracker Plant Container Plant Combinations Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 “Thriller” Red Star Cordyline Sansevieria ‘Brazilian Red Hots’ Alternanthera Spineless Agave “Filler” Cuban Gold Duranta Diamond Frost Nirvana Vince Various Succulents “Spiller” Ornamental Sweet Potato Purslane Sweet Potato Vine Burros Tail Table 2. Container Plant Combinations PAGE 58 DRAFT C. Trees and Palms To increase shade along the sidewalks, Live Oaks and Puerto Rican Hat Palms are paired in the end-of-block bump-outs. In addition, a trio of Yellow Tabebuias enlivens the mid-block bump-outs. Jacaranda and Medjool Palms are used as speci-men canopy trees to punctuate the median land-scaping. These trees are spaced 40 feet apart as recommended in the Road Safety Audit. PAGE 59 DRAFT D. Phase 2 - Long-Range Streetscape Concept Upon completion of the future SR 29 Loop Road, the following changes are proposed in the RSA to increase pedestrian safety and further enhance the streetscape: • The four travel lanes are reduced to two lanes, one in each direction. • A dedicated bike lane is added on both sides of Main Street. • A reverse angled parking configuration replaces the parallel parking. The existing bump-outs, as shown in the Intermediate Streetscape Concept, are expanded toward the bike lane. Additional landscaping, paving, and site furnish-ings may be added to the larger bump-outs. Figure 32. Plan Depicting Long-Range Streetscape 2 travel lanes, reverse angled parking, dedicated bike lane, and handicapped parking. PAGE 60 DRAFT Figure 33. Colored Illustration of Corner Bump-Out PAGE 61 DRAFT Figure 34. Colored Illustration of Mid-Block Bump-Out PAGE 62 DRAFT E. Intermediate and Long-Range Streetscape Concept Comparison Much consideration was given to how to transition from the Intermediate to Long– Range Plan. The goal was to minimize demolition, replanting, and relocation of street furniture. Therefore, the trees planted earlier in the intermediate plan bump-outs remain in the same location, with no transplanting necessary. Es-sentially, the sidewalk bump-outs just become larger, as indicated in the long-range concept plan, and al-low for more landscaping, a larger hardscape, and increased protection for pedestrians on the side-walks. As described in more detail below, both plans pro-pose consolidation of access points onto Main Street to reduce unsafe conditions that currently exist between vehicles and pedestrians. Addition-ally, both plans have an impact on the amount of parking provided, as described below. 1. Restricted Access In an effort to increase pedestrian safety, the RSA recommends reducing driveway access to Main Street. This goal is accomplished in both the Inter-mediate and Long-Range Streetscape Concepts. Potential access improvements to enhance pedestrian safety. Figure 35. PAGE 63 DRAFT Increased on-street parking is an added benefit of reducing too many driveway access points. No property will be left without access from a public road. All of the driveways and access to properties along the two-block prototype (Main Street between 1st and 3rd Streets) were studied. Regarding the driveways immediately west of 1st Street (south side), there is no on-street parking due to a right-hand turn lane (Figure 35). This pair of driveways could remain open without affecting existing or proposed parking. However, if the dou-ble drives were reduced (yellow arrow) to a single access, there would be fewer vehicles crossing the pedestrian sidewalk. The opportunity to in-crease parking on the property could also be a direct positive result of this driveway consolidation. Between 2nd and 3rd Streets (south side), there is existing access for the merchants from 2nd Street (green arrow). Restricting access here (red ar-row) directly from Main Street would result in fewer vehicles crossing the pedestrian sidewalk, and the increased street frontage could be made available for parking. 2. Parking Counts There are approximately 26 existing parking spaces on Main Street between 1st and 3rd Streets. After the addition of the mid-block bump-outs and the longer corner bump-outs, the Intermediate Streetscape Concept proposes reducing parking to 18 spaces in this same area (Main Street between 1st and 3rd Streets). How-ever, the Long-Range Streetscape Concept, with the reverse angle parking spaces, would in-crease parking to 41 spaces in this same area (Main Street between 1st and 3rd Streets). There-fore, there will be an initial reduction in order to address safety concerns, but eventually the im-provements will result in an increase in the num-ber of parking spaces from the Intermediate to Long-Range Concept. There are currently no handicapped parking spaces on Main Street between 1st and 3rd Streets. The RSA suggests providing handi-capped spaces on the side streets that abut Main Street. With the proposed angled parking, two handicapped spaces per block are proposed. For more details about the proposed streetscape plan, a Power Point presentation is included in Appendix B. This presentation provides addi-tional illustrations and clearly depict how the Inter-mediate and Long-Range concepts interface. PAGE 64 DRAFT Implementation Plan The following section presents estimates for planned projects within the Public Realm Plan. Sev-eral of the proposed projects are sequential, multi-stage projects, and require consecutive-year sched-ules and funding. Other projects may be listed fur-ther down the implementation timeline in order to utilize future Tax Increment Funding (TIF) revenues or to follow the completion of the SR 29 Loop Road. A Capital Improvement Plan outlining a timeline and the sequence for these improvements will be devel-oped within the next year. The CIP will provide pro-gramming recommendations; identify responsible parties; and provide funding opportunities. A. Design Standards The Public Realm Plan addresses the form and design of public areas within and adjacent to pub-lic rights-of-way. In conjunction with the Public Realm Plan, there is another report, provided under separate cover, entitled: Central Business District-Form-Based Standards. The purpose and intent of these form-based standards is to guide develop-ment within the Immokalee community toward cre-ating a cohesive urban pattern of buildings (both public and private) that emphasizes the pedestrian experience throughout the CBD. The form-based guidelines also address streetscapes to balance the pedestrian and traffic needs of residents, while protecting and enhancing the original pattern of development. In implementing the two public plazas described in Section IV of this report, it will be necessary that the buildings lining the plazas be located and oriented according to parameters found in the Central Busi-meetings, pay requests, traffic maintenance, landscape or irrigation maintenance. 3. The costs are based on one phase of construc-tion. Multiple phases may increase general cost. 4. Total costs for 1st to 9th Street streetscape im-provements are projected by multiplying an esti-mate created for the 1st to 3rd Street demonstra-tion block by four (four blocks). 5. Cost-estimates for signage are provided separately. These cost estimates reflect implementation of the entire design as proposed. The CRA has leeway in removing elements or replacing elements in order to reduce the overall price. VI. Implementation Plan Component Cost Estimate Streetscape (Intermediate) $3,501,736.68 Streetscape (Long-Range) $1,902,251.00 1st Street Plaza $670,530.90 9th Street Plaza & Park $1,886,683.50 TOTAL $7,961,202.08 Table 3. Summary of Cost Estimates ness District Form-Based Guidelines. The build-ings form the urban edge and engage the sur-rounding open space. B. Cost Estimates Preliminary cost estimates are provided for the streetscape concepts and plaza designs. They are based on the conceptual plans presented, and not on final construction documents, which have not yet been prepared. Construction documents will be developed by a third part designer under contract with the Immokalee MSTU. Three cost estimate tables were prepared: one for the 1st Street Plaza, one for the 9th Street Plaza and Park, and one for the overall streetscape design, from 1st Street to 9th Street. Two prices are shown for the streetscape, one which is the initial invest-ment for the “Intermediate” plan, and another for the additional investment needed in order to imple-ment the “Long-Range” plan, with reconfigured bump-outs and on-street parking. A summary of anticipated construction costs for each component is included below, along with the list of assump-tions used in creating the estimates. 1. Estimated construction costs are based on 2009 industry standards and market rates, plus a 25% contingency for an unknown future start-up date. These figures are based on conceptual drawings and may be adjusted periodically to reflect cur-rent market conditions. 2. Items not included: design and engineering, handicap ramp construction, streetlight reloca-tion, signage, project coordination, permits, PAGE 65 DRAFT Intermediate Long-Range No. Item Unit Unit Cost Qty. Total Qty. Total 1 Medjool Palm, 20' CT ea $5,000.00 3 $15,000.00 0 $0.00 2 Yellow Tabebuia, 25 Gal ea $200.00 8 $1,600.00 2 $400.00 3 Jacaranda, 25 Gal ea $250.00 3 $750.00 0 $0.00 4 High Rise Live Oak, 4" Cal ea $1,000.00 8 $8,000.00 0 $0.00 5 Puerto Rican Hat Palm, 15' CT ea $1,800.00 6 $10,800.00 0 $0.00 6 Dwarf Bougainvillea, 2 Gal ea $18.00 438 $7,884.00 92 $1,656.00 7 Firecracker Plant, 3 Gal ea $12.00 21 $252.00 0 $0.00 8 Green Saw Palmetto, 7 Gal ea $88.00 53 $4,664.00 0 $0.00 9 Cana Lilly, 3 Gal ea $14.00 29 $406.00 0 $0.00 10 Muhly Grass, 1 Gal ea $5.00 0 $0.00 104 $520.00 11 Dwarf Asiatic Jasmine, 4" Pot ea $3.00 695 $2,085.00 1325 $3,975.00 12 Lantana, 1Gal ea $6.25 430 $2,687.50 62 $387.50 13 Mulch, shredded Melaleuca cy $5.60 5000 $28,000.00 5000 $28,000.00 14 8' Sunburst Crosswalks sf $14.00 1680 $23,520.00 0 $0.00 15 Pavement Marking/ Striping ea $3,200.00 4 $12,800.00 4 $12,800.00 16 Remove Existing Curb lf $15.00 450 $6,750.00 800 $12,000.00 17 Const Mid Block Bump Out ea $7,500.00 4 $30,000.00 4 $30,000.00 18 Const Corner Bump Out ea $9,000.00 9 $81,000.00 9 $81,000.00 19 6' Stamp over Exist Conc lf $12.30 350 $4,305.00 0 $0.00 20 New Curb Construction lf $12.50 180 $2,250.00 3400 $42,500.00 21 Rework Exist Bumpouts ea $3,000.00 0 $0.00 12 $36,000.00 22 Parking Spaces ea $1,000.00 0 $0.00 41 $41,000.00 23 6' Colored Bike Lane lf $6.80 0 $0.00 1440 $9,792.00 24 Glass Pavers sf $4.20 70552 $296,318.40 160 $672.00 25 Trash Receptacles ea $252.00 12 $3,024.00 0 $0.00 26 Tree Grate under pavers ea $925.00 24 $22,200.00 0 $0.00 27 ea $1,440.00 8 $11,520.00 8 $11,520.00 28 Plant Containers ea $225.00 44 $9,900.00 0 $0.00 29 Masonry Bench ea $1,370.00 16 $21,920.00 16 $21,920.00 30 Erosion and Sedimentation Cont ls $7,500.00 1 $7,500.00 1 $7,500.00 31 Laser Crossing Devices ea $800.00 27 $21,600.00 0 $0.00 32 Color Concrete sf $4.67 2500 $11,675.00 2500 $11,675.00 33 Irrigation System ls $25,000.00 1 $25,000.00 0.5 $12,500.00 Bike Racks Table 4. Streetscape Concepts Cost Estimate - SR29/Main Street (1st Street to 3rd Street Only) PAGE 66 DRAFT TOTALS $ 673,410.90 $ 365,817.50 Mobilization 5% $ 33,670.55 $ 18,290.88 Contingency 25% $ 168,352.73 $ 91,454.38 TOTALS $ 875,434.17 $ 475,562.75 TOTAL COST ALL IMPROVEMENTS $ 1,350,996.92 TOTAL COST 1st to 9th Street INTERMEDIATE $ 3,501,736.68 TOTAL COST 1st to 9th Street LONG-RANGE $ 1,902,251.00 TOTAL COST 1st to 9th Street, ALL IMPROVEMENTS INTERMEDIATE & LONG-RANGE $ 5,403,987.68 Intermediate: Long-Range: Notes: 1. Estimated construction costs are based on 2009 industry standards and market rates plus a 25% contingency for an un-known future start-up date. These figures are based on conceptual drawings and may be adjusted periodically to reflect current market conditions. 2. Items not included: design and engineering, handicap ramp construction, Infrastructure/ drainage, streetlight relocation, signage, project coordination, permits, meetings, pay requests, traffic maintenance, landscape or irrigation maintenance. 3. The costs above are based on one phase of construction. Multiple phases may increase general cost. 4. Total costs for 1st to 9th Street improvements are estimated by multiplying 1st to 3rd Street cost estimates by four (four blocks). 5. Signage is not included in the streetscape cost-estimate. PAGE 67 DRAFT No. Item Unit Unit Cost Qty. Total 1 Clearing & Stru. Removals ac $ 5,000.00 4.3 $ 21,500.00 2 Excavation - Topsoil cy $ 4.00 6,400 $ 25,600.00 3 Embankment from Off-Site cy $ 9.00 12,000 $ 108,000.00 4 Perimeter Fencing lf $ 27.00 985 $ 26,595.00 5 Sidewalks/ Paths lf $ 24.00 1,450 $ 34,800.00 6 Lake & Water Feature ls $ 68,000.00 1 $ 68,000.00 7 Amphitheater/ Stage ls $ 82,000.00 1 $ 82,000.00 8 Lawn & Event Tenting ea $ 197,000.00 2 $ 394,000.00 9 Restrooms & Bike Lockers ls $ 48,000.00 1 $ 48,000.00 10 Interactive Fountain ls $ 150,000.00 1 $ 150,000.00 11 Bio-Swale & Rain garden ls $ 24,000.00 1 $ 24,000.00 12 Park Landscaping & Sod ls $ 55,000.00 1 $ 55,000.00 13 Two Drives & Parking Lot sy $ 18.50 4,800 $ 88,800.00 14 Irrigation System ls $ 25,000.00 1 $ 25,000.00 15 Playground ea $ 60,000.00 1 $ 60,000.00 16 Site Furnishing ls $ 20,000.00 1 $ 20,000.00 17 Corner Fountain ls $ 80,000.00 1 $ 80,000.00 18 Plaza Corners Concrete ea $ 2,500.00 2 $ 5,000.00 19 Large Restroom Facility els $ 135,000.00 1 $ 135,000.00 TOTALS $ 1,451,295.00 Mobilization 5% $ 72,564.75 Contingency 25% $ 362,823.75 TOTALS $ 1,886,683.50 Notes: 1. Estimated construction costs are based on 2009 industry standards and market rates plus a 25% contingency for an unknown future start-up date. These figures are based on conceptual drawings and may be adjusted periodically to reflect current market conditions. 2. Items not included: design and engineering, handicap ramp construction, streetlight relocation, signage, project coordi-nation, permits, meetings, pay requests, traffic mainte-nance, landscape or irrigation maintenance. 3. The costs above are based on one phase of construction. Multiple phases may increase general cost. Table 5. 9th Street Plaza & Park Concept Cost Estimates PAGE 68 DRAFT No. Item Unit Unit Cost Qty. Total 1 Clearing & Structure Removals ac $ 2,500.00 1.25 $ 3,125.00 2 Excavation - Topsoil & Vegetation cy $ 4.00 1,000 $ 4,000.00 3 Embankment from Off-Site cy $ 9.00 3,700 $ 33,300.00 4 Gateway Columns ea $ 3,500.00 4 $ 14,000.00 5 Specialty Paving on Concrete Area sy $ 53.00 1300 $ 68,900.00 6 Art Wall ls $ 72,000.00 1 $ 72,000.00 7 Pedestrian Directory w/ HDPE ea $ 980.00 4 $ 3,920.00 8 Plaza Fountain ls $ 90,000.00 1 $ 90,000.00 9 Plaza Landscaping ls $ 45,000.00 1 $ 45,000.00 10 60' Dia Medallion, Sun Pattern ea $ 26,000.00 1 $ 26,000.00 11 8' Sunburst Crosswalks sf $ 14.00 1280 $ 17,920.00 12 4' Pebble Zigzag 1f $ 17.00 720 $ 12,240.00 13 Tree Paver Grates ea $ 925.00 12 $ 11,100.00 14 Glass Pavers sf $ 4.20 12,500 $ 52,500.00 15 Masonry Bench ea $ 1,370.00 4 $ 5,480.00 16 Trash Receptacles ea $ 252.00 4 $ 1,008.00 17 Vehicular Directional Sign ea $ 1,600.00 4 $ 6,400.00 18 Erosion & Sedimentation Cont ls $ 7,500.00 1 $ 7,500.00 19 Irrigation System ls $ 5,400.00 1 $ 5,400.00 20 Bollards ea $ 1,000.00 36 $ 36,000.00 TOTALS $ 515,793.00 Mobilization 5% $ 25,789.65 Contingency 25% $ 128,948.25 TOTALS $ 670,530.90 Table 6. 1st Street Plaza Concept Cost Estimates PAGE 69 DRAFT No. Item Unit Unit Cost Qty. Total 1 Large Entry Monument ea $ 44,200.00 3 $132,600.00 2 Small Entry Monument ea $ 13,425.00 2 $ 26,850.00 3 Pedestrian Directory ea $ 2,200.00 4 $ 8,800.00 4 Vehicular Directional ea $ 4,300.00 4 $ 17,200.00 TOTALS $185,450.00 Mobilization 5% $ 9,272.50 Contingency 25% $ 46,362.50 TOTALS $241,085.00 Table 7. Central Business District Signage Concept Cost Estimate 1. The quantity identified for each type of sign is an estimate. Actual number of signs will be decided when program is implemented and if appropriate space is available. PAGE 70 DRAFT Appendix A I. Existing Conditions for the Remainder of the Public Realm Study Area This Appendix details existing conditions for the other areas outside of the CBD, which were re-searched as part of the development of this Public Realm Plan, and also provides more detailed infor-mation for the entire Study Area. A. Overview of Planning Efforts by the Immokalee CRA The Public Realm Plan is part of an on-going effort by the CRA to advance economic development activities and improve the quality of life in Immoka-lee. This effort consists of five other components: revisions to the Immokalee Area Master Plan; an interim deviation process from certain land develop-ment regulations; revisions to the Immokalee Over-lay in the Land Development Code; new transporta-tion regulatory and financial strategies; and a re-vised Capital Improvements Plan to effectively im-plement these new planning approaches. Two of these components have been completed and are in the process of being reviewed by County staff prior to adoption: the revised Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) and the interim land develop-ment regulation deviation process. The IAMP sets forth objectives and policies to address economic development, housing, infrastructure and public services, including transportation, natural resource protection, land use, urban form and design, and intergovernmental coordination. The deviation process from certain Land Development Code re-vides a vision of the location and types of land uses a community desires in the future. Future land use can be considered the first “layer” in land use regulation. The second “layer” is zon-ing. Zoning districts, established through local land development regulations, is the tool used to implement the future land use map. Zoning ‘sits on top of” future land use designations. That is, zoning may be more restrictive than future land use (for example, allowing less density or fewer uses), but it cannot be more permissive than future land use (allowing more density or additional uses). The third layer, which option and used spar-ingly, is a zoning overlay, which adds another layer of regulation on top of the base zoning district, and is more specific to a particular area. In Immokalee, future land use is established in the Immokalee Area Master Plan, part of Collier County’s Growth Management Plan. The IAMP is currently being updated as part of the CRA’s on-going economic development efforts. Therefore, two sets of future land use designations are dis-cussed herein. The first is the adopted future land use, now in effect in Immokalee, shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. The second is the proposed FLU, under consideration for adoption, shown in Figure 3 and Table 2. (Incl. note: Includes right-of-way) quirements for properties in Immokalee will be an interim process, and will only be effective until the full Immokalee Overlay, with land develop-ment regulations specific to Immokalee, has been submitted and approved. The interim lan-guage will allow deviations from requirements such as landscaping and architectural design guidelines, subject to conditions. New regulatory and financial transportation strategies for Immokalee are being created. This process is contingent on two long-range trans-portation planning efforts currently being under-taken by the County, the Rural Land Stewardship Area 5-year review and the build-out transporta-tion study. Finally, a new Capital Improvements Plan will be developed to reflect the new priorities and strategies embodied in these various efforts. B. Future Land Use and Zoning Florida growth management law requires that every local government adopt a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to regulate the use of land within their jurisdiction. The FLUM depicts the location of allowable land uses in broad categories, such as agriculture or commercial, for all properties within the local jurisdiction. Density and intensity standards are also included for each future land use category. These categories represent the location of desired land uses in the future. While the FLUM remains regulatory in nature, it pro- PAGE 71 DRAFT Figure 1. Adopted Future Land Use Map Table 1. Acreage by Adopted FLUM Designation Adopted FLUM Designation Acres Percent Commercial 85.91 10.9% Commercial Center/Industrial 94.87 12.0% Commercial Center/Mixed Use 300.13 38.0% High Residential 126.62 16.0% Low Residential 103.06 13.0% Mixed Residential 52.06 6.6% Neighborhood Center 28.11 3.6% Total 790.76* 100.0% Total acreage is inclusive of right-of-way. PAGE 72 DRAFT Currently, Commerce Center Mixed Use (CCMU) is the most prevalent FLU designation in this area of Immokalee (38%). The IAMP states: 5. Commerce Center Mixed Use Subdistrict The purpose of this designation is to create a major activ-ity center that services the entire Immokalee Urban Des-ignated Area and surrounding agricultural area. The Mixed Use District shall function as an employment cen-ter and shall encourage commercial and institutional uses. Uses permitted within this Subdistrict shall include shopping center, governmental institutions, middle or high school, community park and other employment generating uses. Other permitted commercial uses shall include transient lodging facilities at 26 dwelling units per acre. The appropriate zoning districts include C-1 through C-4 as identified in the Land Development Code. In considering new commercial zoning, priority shall The proposed IAMP states: Commercial - Mixed Use Subdistrict (C-MU): The purpose of this Subdistrict is to create pedes-trian-scaled, higher density residential and mixed-use development, providing for employment and recreational opportunities, cultural and civic activi-ties, and public places to serve residents of and visitors to the Immokalee Urban Area. Nonresiden-tial uses permitted within this Subdistrict include shopping centers, offices, transient lodging facili-ties, government institutions, schools, restaurants and other entertainment uses. In considering new commercial zoning, compatibility with existing resi-dential uses will be evaluated. Existing mobile home subdivisions or parks are allowed in accor-dance with the provisions set forth in Policy 5.1.11. Maximum Standard Density: Sixteen (16) units per gross acre including acreage allocated to com-mercial uses. Maximum Density with Bonuses: Twenty (20) dwelling units per gross acre including acreage allocated to commercial uses Transient lodging is permitted at a maximum den-sity of thirty-two (32) units per acre. be given to protecting existing residential uses. Resi-dential development is permitted within the mixed use Subdistrict at a maximum density of twelve (12) units per gross acre. Residential dwellings shall be limited to multi family structures and less intensive units such as single family and duplexes provided they are compatible with the district. Mobile home developments shall be permitted only in the form of mobile home subdivisions or parks as defined in the Land Development Code. The mixed use district will be controlled via a series of performance standards that address issues of buffering, noise, signage, lighting, architectural com-patibility, lot size, parking and landscaping. In the proposed IAMP, this area of Immokalee would be predominantly designated as Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) (60%). 11%12%38%16%13%7%3%CommercialCommercial Center/IndustrialCommercial Center/Mixed UseHigh ResidentialLow ResidentialFigure 2. Adopted FLUM Designations PAGE 73 DRAFT Figure 3. Proposed Future Land Use Map PAGE 74 DRAFT Table 3 shows the acreage by zoning district, where the districts have been aggregated into similar categories (for example, all commercial districts are added together, rather than C-4, C-5, etc.). The majority of properties are zoned commercial (37%), followed by residential multi-family (24%). There are currently five zoning overlays in Immokalee: State Road 29 Commercial Overlay Subdistrict, Jefferson Avenue Commercial Over-lay Subdistrict, Farm Market Overlay Subdistrict, Agribusiness Over-Table 2. Acreage by Proposed FLUM Designation Proposed FLUM Designation Acres* Percent CMU - Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 443.58 59.8% HR - High Residential Subdistrict 21.76 2.9% IMU - Industrial Mixed Use Subdistrict 91.95 12.4% LR - Low Residential Subdistrict 0.02 0.0% MR - Med Residential Subdistrict 185.35 25.0% Total 742.66 100.0% * excludes right-of-way 60%3%12%0%25%CMU - Commercial Mixed Use SubdistrictHR - High Residential SubdistrictIMU - Industrial Mixed Use SubdistrictLR - Low Residential SubdistrictMR - Med Residential SubdistrictFigure 4. Proposed FLUM Designations Zoning Description Acres Percent Commercial 292.42 37.0% Industrial 2.61 0.3% Mobile Home Residential 12.50 1.6% Planned Unit Development 46.58 5.9% Public 0.67 0.1% Residential Multi-Family 186.08 23.5% Residential Single-Family 158.73 20.1% Residential Tourist 2.16 0.3% Village Residential 89.01 11.3% Total 790.76 100.0% Table 3. Acreage by Zoning Categories 37%2%6%24%20%11%CommercialMobile Home ResidentialPlanned Unit DevelopmentResidential Multi-FamilyResidential Single-FamilyVillage ResidentialFigure 5. Zoning Category Descriptions lay Subdistrict, and the Main Street Overlay Subdistrict. These add use or development standards to supplement those allowed by the base zoning district for a specific area. See Figure 6 for the generalized zoning map and the location of zoning overlays. PAGE 75 DRAFT Figure 6. Zoning Map PAGE 76 DRAFT C. Existing Land Use Existing land use refers to the actual land uses cur-rently on the ground, and is not a regulatory designa-tion. It is a way to analyze current conditions in the Study Area. The Study Area is predominantly residen-tial (residential and mobile home park and recreational vehicles) (43%), with vacant land the second most common land use (22%). See Figure 7, the Existing Land Use Map, and Table 4, below, for the list of land use, number of parcels, and acreages. While it is not unusual for residential to be the most prevalent land use, in Immokalee, the type of residen-tial uses are unique to the area. Several lots are devel-oped with mobile homes and trailers, and several housing developments were specifically created and targeted for lower-income families and agricultural industry workers. There are four affordable housing developments just within the study area – Main Street of the Immokalee Urban Area. Rural portions of the community were not included in the assessment. The inventory catalogued the exterior condition of homes and was conducted through a visual survey that occurred between May and August 2004. As-sessments included the physical condition of each dwelling unit, its visible infrastructure, and surround-ing conditions. Of the 3,558 buildings surveyed, 406 or 11.4 percent, were determined to be deterio-rated or dilapidated, requiring major repairs in order to provide safe and adequate shelter. While the report is somewhat dated, it remains a relevant as-sessment of Immokalee’s housing stock and clearly illustrates that providing safe and adequate shelter Land Use Parcel Count Percent Acres Percent Agriculture 5 0.5% 32.94 4.2% Commercial 115 12.0% 79.72 10.1% Government 11 1.1% 39.36 5.0% Industrial 11 1.1% 46.73 5.9% Institutional 45 4.7% 58.97 7.5% Mobile Home or Recreational Vehicle Park 11 1.1% 15.02 1.9% Single-family Residential 507 53.0% 267.38 33.6% Multi-family Residential 43 4.5% 36.84 4.7% Roadways 4 0.4% 39.45 5.0% Vacant Land 205 21.4% 173.83 22.3% Total 957 100.0% 790.24 100.0% Table 4. Public Realm Study Area Existing Land Uses Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, February 2009; Analysis prepared by RWA, Inc. 4%10%5%6%7%2%34%5%5%22%AgricultureCommercialGovernmentIndustrialInstitutionalMobile Home or RV ParkSF ResidentialMF ResidentialRoadwaysVacant LandFigure 7. Existing Land Uses Village, at the northeast corner of 11th Street and Main Street (79 units); Oakhaven, on the north side of Colo-rado Avenue between 4th Street and 7th Street (160 units); the Farmworker Dormitory, south of the Immoka-lee Government Service Center off of Fahrney Street (192 beds), and Milagro Place on Rose Avenue, east of 1st Street (26 units). This is a relatively large concentra-tion of affordable housing developments, and exempli-fies some of the differences between Immokalee and coastal Collier County. Though only 7.6 percent of the County’s total population resides in Immokalee, 43 per-cent of the affordable housing projects are located in Immokalee. Results from the Immokalee Housing Condition In-ventory, prepared in 2004 by Collier County should be noted. This report assessed housing conditions, with the exception of trailer parks, throughout most PAGE 77 DRAFT Figure 8. Existing Land Use Map PAGE 78 DRAFT for residents of Immokalee remains a challenge. D. Local Roadway Level of Service Table 6 includes the average annual daily trips and level of service (LOS) for seg-ments of SR 29 through Immokalee, as well as for major roadways within the Study Area. E. Environmentally Significant Lands A small portion of the Lake Trafford Urban Wetlands Overlay (currently called “Wetlands Connected to Lake Trafford/Camp Keias Strand System”), as depicted on the proposed Immokalee Future Land Use Map, extends into the Study Area, west of SR 29 and south of Roberts Road (in Subarea 2). These wetlands were de-lineated through aerial interpretation by Collier County staff, and have not been field-verified. Current regulations for areas within this overlay require that property owners preserve wetlands identified as flowways and areas utilized by listed spe-cies or serving as corridors for the move-ment of wildlife. Table 5. Immokalee Roadways: Peak Hour Traffic Counts and Level of Service (LOS) Segment ID Roadway Road Segment Existing Road Type 10-month Peak Hour Peak Dir Service Volume 2008 Peak Hour Peak Dir Volume LOS 1 SR 29 CR 858 to CR 29A (New Market) 2-lane, undivided 875 404 C 2 SR 29 CR 29A South to N 15th Street 4-lane, divided 1,860 661 B 3 SR 29 N 15th Street to CR 29A North 2-lane, undivided 875 550 C 4 SR 29 CR 29A North to SR 82 2-lane, undivided 875 550 C 5 Lake Trafford Rd W of SR 29 to SR 29 2-lane, undivided 875 367 C 6 New Market Rd Broward St to SR 29 2-lane, undivided 1,010 893 C 7 N. 1st Street New Market Road to Main Street 2-lane, undivided 1,000 457 C 8 CR 846/ Immokalee Rd/ S. 1st Street Oil Well Road to SR 29 2-lane, undivided 860 262 C Source: Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities, 2008 PAGE 79 DRAFT F. Subarea 1: Northern Immokalee Subarea 1 consists of approximately 161 acres, containing 224 parcels, and extends from Lake Traf-ford Road to Immokalee Drive. The largest current land use is residential (60%), followed by institutional uses (11%), and vacant land (11%). See Figure 8, Existing Land Use Exhibit, and Table 7. Figure 10 is an aerial of this Subarea, with photo-graphs, labeled 1-7, to illustrate typical develop-ment. There are five single-family homes that di-rectly access SR 29, all of them on large lots (greater than one acre) (see photo 6 on the ae-rial). Commercial buildings range in age from new construction, such as the Auto Zone (photo 2), to much older construction, such as the Immokalee Inn (photo 3). Land use intensities are low, with large setbacks, and relatively small buildings on large lots. Most buildings are one-story in height. There are three, two-story buildings – the Immo-kalee Inn, the First Baptist Church, and Eye Cen-ters of Florida – ranging in height from 20 feet to 30 feet; however, because of the large setbacks, the overall effect remains that of very low-intensity development. While new construction appears to conform to Col-lier County landscaping regulations, landscaping for older commercial projects is substandard. Non-residential development extends approximately one block east and west of SR 29, then land uses tran-sition into single-family residential development. To the east, north of Santa Rosa Avenue, lots range in size Table 6. Subarea 1 Existing Land Uses Land Use Parcel Count Percent Acres Percent Agriculture 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% Commercial 15 6.7% 12.73 7.9% Government 1 0.4% 0.72 0.4% Institutional 12 5.4% 17.32 10.8% Mobile Home or RV Park 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% Single-family Residential 158 70.5% 97.87 60.8% Multi-family Residential 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% Roadways 1 0.4% 15.34 9.5% Vacant Land 37 16.5% 17.03 10.6% Total 224 100% 161.01 100.0% Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, February 2009; Analysis prepared by RWA, Inc. 8%11%61%9%11%CommercialInstitutionalSF ResidentialFigure 9. Subarea 1 Existing Land Uses PAGE 80 DRAFT Figure 10. Subarea 1 Northern Immokalee PAGE 81 DRAFT Figure 11. Subarea 1 Existing Land Use PAGE 82 DRAFT from a little over a third of an acre to slightly under one acre. South of Santa Rosa Avenue, lots measure one-quarter acre. To the west of SR 29, lots are generally about one-quarter acre in size. There are no sidewalks interior to these residential communities; however, there are sidewalks along both sides of Immokalee Drive east of SR 29, along the south side of Immokalee Drive west of SR 29, and along a portion of the west side of North 18th Street, from Lake Trafford to 8th Avenue. In this section of the Study Area, the right-of-way width for SR 29 doubles in size, from an average of 100 feet to 200 feet. This is the original right-of-way width from the design and construction of SR 29 in the 1940’s, and is comparable to right-of-way reser-vations for some sections of I-75 in Collier County. Setbacks from the property line range from twenty feet to over 100 feet; the ad-dition of right-of-way adds another 50 feet to these setback depths. Parking is located in front of buildings, with the exception of parking fa-cilities for the First Baptist Church, which are lo-cated off of Lake Trafford Road. In this sec-tion, SR 29 is built without curb and gutter. Four-foot concrete sidewalks are located on both sides of the road, and no bicycle lane is provided. Additional sidewalk seg-ments have been constructed along the property line of new commercial buildings (the Walgreen’s and Autozone, see Photo 2 on the Subarea aerial), creating a second sidewalk, closer to the building. The Public Realm Plan does not propose new de-sign standards for this Subarea. The Plan focuses on areas closer to downtown, where more pedes-trian activity currently occurs, and where the exist-ing conditions are more condusive to redevelop-ment, less right of way is reserved for roadway ex-pansion, buildings are located closer to the street, and where additional improvements to the public realm have already been constructed (paver side-walks, seating areas, planters, etc.) However, the CRA could consider future improvements within this Subarea, such as the feasibility of extending the proposed plant palette and enhanced landscaping into this Subarea, or the construction of a multi-use path within the right-of-way. Any future corridor im-provements should complement the proposed de-sign regulations of this public realm plan, although it may not be identical to them. PAGE 83 DRAFT G. Subarea 2: Suburban Immokalee Subarea 2 consists of approximately 285 acres, con-taining 166 parcels, and extends from Immokalee Drive to 9th Street. The largest land use is residential (residential and mobile home/recreational vehicle park) (39%), followed by vacant lands (21%), and agriculture (12%). See Figure 12, Existing Land Use Exhibit, and Table 8, below. This area is suburban in character, with most build-ings along SR 29 set back substantially from the road, and a sidewalk along the west side only. Fig-ure 13 is an aerial of this Subarea, with photographs, numbered 1-9, to illustrate typical development. Resi-dential developments include a mobile home park and a trailer park with direct access onto SR 29 (see photo 2 of the aerial exhibit). Residential units to the east of SR 29 are located on typical subdivision lots, while those to the west of SR 29 are single-family homes on larger lots (0.93 acres to 4.16 acres) (photo 3 on the aerial exhibit). Commercial properties include newer developments, such as the McDon-ald’s, Popeye’s (photo 6), and Goodwill, with land-scaped buffers and landscaping that appears to be consistent with code requirements. Older commercial properties, such as the Immokalee Tire (photo 5 on the aerial exhibit) or Ace Hardware (photo 4), lack landscaped buffers and have minimal landscaping. The lack of landscaping may reflect that the buildings pre-date current landscaping requirements. Roberts Ranch (photo 8), owned by Collier County as a his-toric and cultural site, is also within Subarea 2, total-ing about 13 acres on the north side of the curve. Consistent with typical suburban commercial develop-ment, the structures are low-intensity, and one-story in height except for the Lee County Electric Cooperative, which is two-story building. There are several vacant or Land Use Parcel Count Percent Acres Percent Agriculture 5 3.0% 32.94 11.6% Commercial 15 9.0% 24.69 8.7% Government 5 3.0% 30.73 10.8% Institutional 8 4.8% 25.23 8.9% Mobile Home or RV Park 6 3.6% 7.82 2.7% Single-family Residential 89 53.6% 94.07 33.0% Multi-family Residential 7 4.2% 10.24 3.6% Roadways 1 0.6% 0.02 0.0% Vacant Land 30 18.1% 59.12 20.8% Total 166 100.0% 284.87 100.0% Table 7. Subarea 2 Existing Land Uses Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, February 2009; Analysis prepared by RWA, Inc. agricultural parcels, which also create a suburban char-acter. SR 29 is not built with curb and gutter in this sec-tion which is more consistent with a rural road cross-section rather than a more urban roadway treatment. Land uses are mixed in nature. The blue light poles are the only attempt at cohesive design; however, the light poles lack landscaping, and are overwhelmed by utility lines and the height of the electrical poles. 11%9%11%9%3%33%3%21%AgricultureCommercialGovernmentInstitutionalMobile Home or RV ParkSF ResidentialMF ResidentialVacant LandFigure 12. Subarea 2 Existing Land Uses PAGE 84 DRAFT Figure 13. Subarea 2 Suburban Immokalee PAGE 85 DRAFT Figure 14. Subarea 2 Current Land Use PAGE 86 DRAFT H. Subarea 4: Agricultural-Industrial Immokalee Subarea 4, from East 2nd Street to New Market Road, consists of mostly agricultural-industrial uses and buildings, and contains 62 parcels in approximately 116 acres. The majority of land uses are industrial (40%), followed by vacant land (25%), and road right-of-way (15%). See Table 8 and Figure 15, Existing Land Use. Typical industrial construction in Subarea 4 is shown on the aerial, Figure XX. The industrial buildings are large structures, with heights ranging from 35 to 60 feet. Industrial buildings have little fenestration, limited landscaping or buffering, and extensive outdoor stor-age. Agricultural processing continues to be an im-portant industry for the local economy, as it has been for several decades. While industrial uses are not typi-cal “downtown” or “public realm” uses, the area is included in the Public Realm Plan Study Ares due to its close proximity to the downtown core and be-cause it important local employment center. However, it was not included in the CBD due to the nature of these uses. Table 8. Subarea 4 Existing Land Uses Land Use Parcel Count Percent Acres Percent Agriculture 0 0.0% 0.0 0.0% Commercial 10 16.1% 8.86 7.6% Government 1 1.6% 0.01 0.0% Industrial 11 17.7% 46.73 40.3% Institutional 1 1.6% 0.08 0.1% Mobile Home or RV Park 1 1.6% 1.85 1.6% Single-family Residential 15 3.2% 11.57 10.0% Multi-family Residential 1 1.6% 0.94 0.8% Roadways 1 1.6% 16.96 14.6% Vacant Land 21 54.8% 29.07 25.0% Total 62 100.0% 116.07 100.0% Source: Collier County Property Appraiser, February 2009; Analysis prepared by RWA, Inc. 8%40%1%10%1%15%25%CommercialIndustrialMobile Home or RV ParkSF ResidentialMF ResidentialRoadwaysVacant LandFigure 15. Subarea 4 Existing Land Uses PAGE 87 DRAFT Figure 16. Subarea 4 Agricultural Industrial Immokalee PAGE 88 DRAFT Figure 17. Subarea 4 Current Land Use PAGE 89 DRAFT Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan Immokalee currently experiences significant flood-ing issues. A Stormwater Master Plan for Immoka-lee was completed in 2006 to address flood-prone areas and recommend stormwater improvements to alleviate those flooding problems. The Plan was recently adopted by the Board of County Commis-sioners, which will allow the CRA to move forward with implementation of proposed improvements. The Immokalee area developed over the years with-out a plan for a cohesive water management sys-tem, which has led to inadequate drainage, flood-ing, and concerns over water quality. H.W. Lochner Inc. was commissioned to prepare a Stormwater Management Plan for Immokalee, and has pro-duced a stormwater model and associated report that documents design inputs and outputs, flooding stages, and water quality analysis. The stormwater model was used to assess current conditions and develop a number of different conceptual drainage improvements and alternatives to alleviate flooding and improve water quality issues within the Immo-kalee area. The Lochner report was prepared for a very large basin, roughly 22,000 acres. The study area for the Immokalee CRA Public Realm is only a small por-tion of this large basin, roughly 790 acres. The re-port recommended four alternatives for improve-ments. Of the four alternatives, Alternative #4 was determined to be the most beneficial in terms of flood mitigation and water quality. Alternative #4 consists of six areas for improvement: 1. Lake Trafford Ditch Culvert Upgrades 2. Fish Creek 3. Madison Creek Ditch 4. Slough Cross-Drain Additions 5. Immokalee Drive 6. Downtown Immokalee Although all of these improvements would greatly benefit the Immokalee community, only items 5 and 6 provide direct improvements and benefits to the Study Area and more specifically the CBD. Area 5 (Immokalee Drive) improvements include the following: a. a 48” pipe from SR 29 to Wells Street along Immokalee Drive; b. a 48” pipe on Wells Street from Immoka-lee Drive south to the terminus of Wells Street; c. a weir control structure at the south termi-nus of Wells Street; d. 18” exfiltration trenches on Immokalee Figure 18. Area 5 Improvements PAGE 90 DRAFT Drive west of Wells Street; and e. 18” exfiltration trenches on 16th Street north of Immokalee Drive. Area 6 (Downtown Immokalee) improvements consist of: a. 48” pipes along Delaware, Colorado, and Boston Avenues running east and west; b. a series of 18” exfiltration trenches on vari-ous streets running north and south; c. a weir control structure at 5th Street and Bethune Drive; and d. a 2-acre lake at the intersection of South 9th Street and Eustis Avenue. The improvements proposed in Areas 5 and 6 will help decrease flood stages by providing a better conveyance system to transport stormwater. Re-sults will vary depending on location. Some areas that currently flood may not flood at all, some may have less flooding, or the stormwater may dissipate more quickly and the land return to natural dry con-ditions more rapidly. Large 48-inch pipes are used to transport stormwater from residential and commer-cial areas to the outfall locations because stormwater flows more easily through a smooth pipe than through a rough grassy swale. A 48-inch pipe also has more capacity than the existing ditches and can transport larger volumes of water. Replacement of roadway ditches with exfiltration trenches will en-hance the aesthetic appeal and safety of the road-way network by filling in open ditches with pipe and gravel and seeding or sodding over it. The final result will look the same as a typical drainage pipe installa-tion, but will allow stormwater to seep directly back into the ground. A successful exfiltration trench will depend on water table elevations, maintenance plans, soil conditions, and capacity requirements at each location, which may need further investigation. Benefits to the CBD The stormwater master plan model simulates existing and future conditions with respect to drainage infra-structure, not land use basin characterization. Exist-ing condition were modeled as the basin exists to-day. Future condition were then modeled by adding the drainage improvements, that is, the pipes, weirs, lakes, etc. The model did not simulate future land use changes, e.g. a change of agricultural land to Figure 19. Area 6 Improvements PAGE 91 DRAFT commercial. Therefore, future growth modifications to specific land uses may have to be evaluated and simulated to determine impacts to the conveyance, storage, and water quality treatment aspects of the stormwater management system. However, new de-velopment will be required to meet more stringent wa-ter quality and quantity standards than existing devel-opment, and the impact of future development can be anticipated to result in positive improvements to stormwater management. How new improvements will interface with existing stormwater management sys-tems, or the lack thereof, and the overall drainage pat-tern that will be created must be considered in the review of all future development. Water quality will be improved by utilizing weir control structures to regulate the storage volume in order to reduce pollutant transfers and promote biological nu-trient uptake. Pollutants and nutrients are held back from discharging into receiving waters and are given time to settle out and be absorbed by plant life. Through the use of weir control structures, water quan-tity will also be regulated, which will result in improved discharges to sensitive receiving waters, such as the adjacent slough, Lake Trafford, and the SR 29 Canal system. Improving the water quality in these areas will help enhance recreational opportunities on a local and regional level. One of the most beneficial improvements to the CBD is the proposed two-acre lake. The Stormwa-ter Master Plan conceptually located this lake just south of Colorado Avenue and west of South 9th Street. The lake provides the most immediate and visible stormwater management improvement for water quality treatment and water quantity storage. In addition, it could also be a catalyst for redevelop-ment in this portion of the community, as it could provide a recreational amenity. It is recom-mended that the lake improvement be expe-dited, as it has great potential to be a positive benefit to the Immokalee community, both in significant benefits to stormwater control in the downtown area and as a potential passive rec-reation park site. Exhibit 24 ABB Work Order/Purchase Order/Proposal/Notice To Proceed 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 2 PROVIDE/MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 3 PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING AND LAYOUT LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 4 PROVIDE/MAINTAIN PROJECT SCHEDULE LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 5 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 6 COMMERCIAL MATERIAL FOR DRIVEWAY MAINTENANCE CY 50 $24.00 $1,200.00 7 PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO OF PROJECT LIMITS LS 1 $800.00 $800.00 8 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 9 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (0.88 AC)LS 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 10 REMOVAL OF CONCRETE PAVEMENT SY 25 $9.00 $225.00 11 DITCH GRADING LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 12 OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 6 (8" LIMEROCK)SY 134 $17.50 $2,345.00 13 SUPERPAVE A.C. (9.5)(TRAFFIC C)(2")TN 16.2 $200.00 $3,240.00 14 CLASS I CONCRETE (DRIVEWAYS)(6" THICK)SY 94 $41.00 $3,854.00 15 INLETS (DITCH BOTTOM TYPE C)(<10')EA 12 $2,000.00 $24,000.00 16 MANHOLES (P-7) (<10')EA 1 $2,375.00 $2,375.00 17 PIPE CULVERT (CLASS III CONCRETE)(STORM SEWER)(ROUND SHAPE)(15") LF 133 $45.00 $5,985.00 18 PIPE CULVERT (CLASS III CONCRETE)(STORM SEWER)(ROUND SHAPE)(18") LF 234 $55.00 $12,870.00 19 CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 6" THICK SY 669 $41.00 $27,429.00 20 DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPS (Cast Into Concrete Sidewalk)EA 3 $500.00 $1,500.00 21 PERFORMANCE TURF (BAHIA SOD)(INCLUDES WATER, FERTILIZER & MOWING) SY 1,920 $3.00 $5,760.00 22 SINGLE POST SIGN (RELOCATE)EA 4 $150.00 $600.00 23 THERMOPLASTIC (STANDARD)(WHITE)(MESSAGE)EA 1 $90.00 $90.00 24 THERMOPLASTIC (STANDARD)(WHITE)(SOLID)(12")LF 161 $2.10 $338.10 25 THERMOPLASTIC (STANDARD)(WHITE)(SOLID)(24")LF 194 $5.00 $970.00 26 THERMOPLASTIC (STANDARD)(YELLOW)(SOLID)(6")LF 48 $1.50 $72.00 27 ROADWAY ALLOWANCE FIXED 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 28 DRAINAGE ALLOWANCE FIXED 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 29 ADJUST FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EA 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 30 ADJUST WATER SERVICE EA 1 $350.00 $350.00 31 UTILITY ALLOWANCE FIXED 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $158,003.10 Total CostItem No.Description Unit Quantity TOTAL SOUTH 9TH STREET Unit Cost Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc 60% Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost IMMOKALEE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS December 23, 2016 South 9th Street With West Eustis Ave. & South 5th Street BID ALTERNATES Exhibit 25 ABB 60% Cost Estimate Total CostItem No.Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc 60% Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost IMMOKALEE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS December 23, 2016 South 9th Street With West Eustis Ave. & South 5th Street BID ALTERNATES 32 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $28,000.00 $28,000.00 33 PROVIDE/MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 34 PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING AND LAYOUT LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 35 PROVIDE/MAINTAIN PROJECT SCHEDULE LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 36 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC LS 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 37 COMMERCIAL MATERIAL FOR DRIVEWAY MAINTENANCE CY 200 $24.00 $4,800.00 38 PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO OF PROJECT LIMITS LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 39 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 40 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (1.83 AC)LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 41 REMOVAL OF CONCRETE PAVEMENT SY 137 $9.00 $1,233.00 42 MAILBOX (RELOCATE)EA 10 $95.00 $950.00 43 DITCH GRADING LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 44 OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 6 (8" LIMEROCK)SY 66 $17.50 $1,155.00 45 SUPERPAVE A.C. (9.5)(TRAFFIC C)(2")TN 8.0 $200.00 $1,600.00 46 CLASS I CONCRETE (DRIVEWAYS)(6" THICK)SY 521 $41.00 $21,361.00 47 INLETS (DITCH BOTTOM TYPE C)(<10')EA 18 $2,000.00 $36,000.00 48 MANHOLES (P-7) (<10')EA 1 $2,375.00 $2,375.00 49 PIPE CULVERT (CLASS III CONCRETE)(STORM SEWER)(ROUND SHAPE)(15") LF 371 $45.00 $16,695.00 50 PIPE CULVERT (CLASS III CONCRETE)(STORM SEWER)(ROUND SHAPE)(18") LF 564 $55.00 $31,020.00 51 RESET BRICK PAVERS SY 210 $45.00 $9,450.00 52 CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 6" THICK SY 1,202 $41.00 $49,282.00 53 DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPS (Cast Into Concrete Sidewalk) EA 5 $500.00 $2,500.00 54 PERFORMANCE TURF (BAHIA SOD)(INCLUDES WATER, FERTILIZER & MOWING) SY 3,680 $3.00 $11,040.00 55 THERMOPLASTIC (STANDARD)(WHITE)(SOLID)(12") LF 143 $2.10 $300.30 56 THERMOPLASTIC (STANDARD)(WHITE)(SOLID)(24") LF 104 $5.00 $520.00 57 ROADWAY ALLOWANCE FIXED 1 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 58 DRAINAGE ALLOWANCE FIXED 1 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 59 ADJUST WATER SERVICE EA 13 $350.00 $4,550.00 60 6" FORCEMAIN DEFLECTION EA 1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 61 ADJUST SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TO GRADE EA 3 $400.00 $1,200.00 62 ADJUST SANITARY SEWER LATERAL EA 12 $700.00 $8,400.00 63 UTILITY ALLOWANCE FIXED 1 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $336,431.30TOTAL WEST EUSTIS AVE BID ALTERNATIVE Total CostItem No.Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc 60% Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost IMMOKALEE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS December 23, 2016 South 9th Street With West Eustis Ave. & South 5th Street BID ALTERNATES 64 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 65 PROVIDE/MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 66 PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING AND LAYOUT LS 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 67 PROVIDE/MAINTAIN PROJECT SCHEDULE LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 68 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC LS 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 69 COMMERCIAL MATERIAL FOR DRIVEWAY MAINTENANCE CY 50 $24.00 $1,200.00 70 PRECONSTRUCTION VIDEO OF PROJECT LIMITS LS 1 $600.00 $600.00 71 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 72 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (0.38 AC)LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 73 REMOVAL OF CONCRETE PAVEMENT SY 108 $9.00 $972.00 74 MAILBOX (RELOCATE)EA 3 $95.00 $285.00 75 DITCH GRADING LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 76 CLASS I CONCRETE (DRIVEWAYS)(6" THICK)SY 246 $41.00 $10,086.00 77 INLETS (DITCH BOTTOM TYPE C)(<10')EA 9 $2,000.00 $18,000.00 78 PIPE CULVERT (CLASS III CONCRETE)(STORM SEWER)(ROUND SHAPE)(15") LF 269 $45.00 $12,105.00 79 CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 6" THICK SY 235 $41.00 $9,635.00 80 DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPS (Cast Into Concrete Sidewalk) EA 3 $500.00 $1,500.00 81 PERFORMANCE TURF (BAHIA SOD)(INCLUDES WATER, FERTILIZER & MOWING) SY 1,110 $3.00 $3,330.00 82 THERMOPLASTIC (STANDARD)(WHITE)(MESSAGE)EA 1 $90.00 $90.00 83 THERMOPLASTIC (STANDARD)(WHITE)(SOLID)(12") LF 115 $2.10 $241.50 84 THERMOPLASTIC (STANDARD)(WHITE)(SOLID)(24") LF 140 $5.00 $700.00 85 ROADWAY ALLOWANCE FIXED 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 86 DRAINAGE ALLOWANCE FIXED 1 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 87 ADJUST WATER SERVICE EA 1 $350.00 $350.00 88 ADJUST FORCEMAIN VALVE TO GRADE EA 1 $500.00 $500.00 89 UTILITY ALLOWANCE FIXED 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $94,794.50 $589,228.90 TOTAL SOUTH 5TH STREET BID ALTERNATIVE TOTAL PROJECT WITH BID ALTERNATIVES 3233343458910Rd.ImmokaleeTowerIMMOKALEEBunker Hill2929ACOMPONENTS OF CONTRACT PLANS SETSIDEWALK PLANSPLANS OF PROPOSEDBeginning of S 9TH STSTA. 900+00Begining of S 5TH STSTA. 501+50 CHIPLEYTALLAHASSEE JACKSONVILLEST AUGUSTINEGAINESVILLEOCALADELAND4NEW PORT RICHEYTAMPA 4LAKELANDMELBOURNE -COCOAORLANDOBARTOWST PETERSBURG FT PIERCEFT MYERSFT LAUDERDALEMIAMI NAPLESKEY WEST FORT WALTONBEACHPENSACOLAWEST PALMBEACHFLORIDATURNPIKEPANAMACITYLAKECITYDAYTONABEACHSARASOTA -BRADENTONBEE LINEEXPRESSWAY757595752757529510957510PROJECT LOCATIONINDEX OF SIDEWALK PLANSSHEET NO.SHEET DESCRIPTION1COVER2-3 GENERAL NOTES4TYPICAL SECTION5PROJECT LAYOUT6-20 EXISTING CONDITIONS21-35 PLAN AND PROFILE36-38 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS39-44 SWPPP45-59 SIGNING AND MARKINGNGOVERNING DESIGN STANDARDS:Florida Department of Transportation, FY2016-17 Design StandardseBook (DSeB) and applicable Design Standards Revisions (DSRs) at thefollowing website:APPLICABLE DSRs:GOVERNING STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS:Florida Department of Transportation, JAN, 2017 StandardSpecifications for Road and Bridge Construction at the followingwebsite:http://www.fdot.gov/rddesign/DesignStandards/Standards.shtmhttp://www.fdot.gov/programmanagement/Implemented/SpecBooks ABCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Professional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLICertificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664Ph: (239) 597-3111 - Fax: (239) 566-2203EDWARD F. TRYKA III, P.E. NO. 60284CONSULTANT PROJECT MANAGERAGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAGE, INC.SUBMITTED BY:DATEPREPARED FORIMMOKALEESIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSLOCATION MAPDecember 22, 2016PLAN STAGE 60%Beginning of EUSTIS AVESTA. 150+00Ending of S 5TH STSTA. 507+00Ending of S 9TH STSTA. 913+00Ending of EUSTIS AVESTA. 163+39.50JAMES SAINVILUSPROJECT MANAGERIMMOKALEE MTSU750 SOUTH 5TH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142Exhibit 26 60% Design Plans -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664259IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSGENERAL NOTESCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_NOTES -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664359------IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSGENERAL NOTESCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_NOTES ℄ CONST. S 5TH STExist. EOP Exist. Sidewalk Exist. R/W℄ CONST. EUSTIS AVEExist. R/WExist. R/W℄ CONST. S 9TH ST30'0.021' SOD30'30'VARIES3'5' CONC.SIDEWALK2'DITCH VARIES30'VARIESSOD5' CONC.SIDEWALKVARIES SOD2'DITCH VARIES2'5' CONC.SIDEWALK1'SODSODSODSODSODExist. R/W5' CONC.SIDEWALK0.020.020.022'SOD2'SOD3:13:13:13:13:13:1VARIESLANE EDGELINE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664SHEET4OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSTYPICAL SECTIONDATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_TYPCONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE6" THICKASPHALT DRIVES - SCHOOL2" SUPERPAVE A.C.SP (9.5) (TRAFFIC C)OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 4(8" LIMEROCK)CONCRETE DRIVESCONCRETE6" THICK 897898 900 902 904 906 908 910 912 914 916 918 150152154156158160162163500 502 504 506 508 510 5112728293031 3233 34 35 36 21 22 23 24 25 26 ¡ EUSTIS AVE¡ S 5TH ST¡ S 9TH STN 89° 39' 18" EN 00° 31' 48" WN 00° 04' 21" EBEGIN S 9TH STSTA. 900+00.00BEGIN EUSTIS AVESTA. 150+00.00BEGIN S 5TH STSTA. 501+50.00END S 5TH STSTA. 507+00.00END EUSTIS AVESTA. 163+39.50END S 9TH STSTA. 913+00.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664NNTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET5OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPROJECT LAYOUTDATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_LAYOUT 150 90090190212" CMP18" CMPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SSSSSSSSSFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-WM6" EX-WM8" EX-WM6" EX-FM 8" EX-FM8" EX-FM8" EX-WM12" EX-WM Parcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARYOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOELIMEROCK8" EX-FM8" EX-WM8" EX-WM X-R/WX-R/W¡ S 9TH STSANITATIONROADW EUSTIS AVES 9TH ST27.15 27.40 27.30 27.60 27.48 27.70 27.39 27.83 27.02 26.76 26.67 27.18 27.1927.62 24.97 27.5627.53 25.44 26.91 26.86 26.84WATER26.87 26.9425.0427.1727.31 27.2427.02 25.00 27.13 27.07 27.1026.3424.4726.5927.06 26.52 26.49 25.93 25.78 24.2824.2324.00 27.24 27.43 27.27 27.28 26.7226.6826.8427.1327.15 23.64 SAN26.80 SAN26.79 SAN26.88 SAN26.9226.8027.2227.3026.70 26.79 27.0427.0327.1524.3126.0026.7526.6226.4526.5926.7526.7124.67 24.49 WATER27.08 26.7526.76 26.8026.80 26.78 27.18 27.0126.86 26.2326.27 26.2626.2126.25 27.19 27.15 26.8726.7726.99 27.08 27.18 26.7026.8226.92 26.84 27.08 26.65 26.8726.8126.8126.8325.8525.8426.5024.6126.5226.35 26.5126.3626.5126.4826.8826.8827.0727.06 27.36 27.3127.04 27.04 27.34 27.50 26.88 26.78 26.94 26.3826.5626.46 27.15 26.79 27.01 26.78 26.15 26.10 MATCHLINE STA - 901+99.00899+40.00-901+99.002022242628303220242832SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW900+00901+0018" CMP8" EX-FM8" EX-FM8" EX-WMEXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET6OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - S 9THSTSTA. 899+40.00 TO STA. 901+99.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 90290390418" RCPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-FM12" EX-WMParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARYOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOELIMEROCK8" EX-SSX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 9TH ST28.05 28.25 27.97 28.18 27.21 27.1327.0626.9026.0227.9828.05 27.39 27.8327.56 27.93 27.68 28.09 27.87 28.13 27.9727.84 25.95 27.36 27.35 27.15 27.2027.2227.2025.8927.7127.81 27.8127.74 25.80 27.29 27.12 27.34 26.97WATER26.39 WATER27.30 WATER27.22 WATER27.3027.09 27.2327.0626.9525.2827.7127.84 25.1827.38 27.34 27.2227.0226.7626.6727.1827.1927.62 24.9727.5627.53 25.44 26.91 26.8627.58 27.35 26.9427.0427.3427.50MATCHLINE STA - 901+99.00 MATCHLINE STA - 904+58.00901+99.00-904+58.002022242628303220242832SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW902+00903+00904+0018" RCP8" EX-FM12" EX-WMEX-SS-128" EX-WM8" EX-SSEXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET7OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - S 9THSTSTA. 901+99.00 TO STA. 904+58.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 90590690714"X23" ERCP14"X23" ERCP18" RCPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-SS8" EX-SS12" EX-WMParcel No. 78570400007TORRES, MARIA INEZParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARYOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEASPH.12" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 9TH ST28.62 28.82 29.03 29.13 29.21 29.34 29.28 29.39 28.9928.99 29.1429.02 28.87 29.05 28.85 28.97 28.8928.9228.8928.9829.07 28.95 28.82 28.7528.95 28.4928.46 28.43 28.46 28.46 WATER28.9328.3428.38 26.73 28.9128.9128.8828.8826.76 28.01 28.73 28.7228.7528.87 28.77 28.4828.3128.05 28.25 28.99 28.74 28.93 29.03 28.95 28.64 29.09 29.0328.83 28.86 26.3328.5428.55 28.4028.26 27.93 28.0427.9626.1528.7828.85 28.14 28.24 27.8728.0227.8026.4328.6828.59 28.2328.18 26.21 27.37 27.30 27.3227.21 27.1327.0626.9026.0227.9828.05 22.54 28.60 28.41 28.58 28.57 28.21 28.77 28.70 W DELAWARE AVEMATCHLINE STA - 904+58.00 MATCHLINE STA - 907+17.00904+58.00-907+17.002022242628303220242832SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW905+00906+00907+008" EX-SS12" EX-WM14"X23" ERCP18" RCPEXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET8OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - S 9THSTSTA. 904+58.00 TO STA. 907+17.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 90790890991015" RCP14"X23" ERCPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-SS8" EX-SS8" EX-SS12" EX-WM12" EX-WMParcel No. 78570240005CASTRO, BONIFACIO & ESMERALDAParcel No. 78570280007RODRIGUEZ JR, RAYMOND=& LILIAParcel No. 78570320006RODRIGUEZ JR, RAYMOND=& LILIAParcel No. 78570360008RODRIGUEZ JR, RAYMOND=& LILIAParcel No. 78570400007TORRES, MARIA INEZParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARYOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEASPH.GRAVEL8" EX-SS8" EX-SS8" EX-SSX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 9TH ST29.28 29.3929.22 29.39 29.49 29.57 29.77 29.88 29.84 29.97 30.00 30.14 29.3428.9628.9027.9229.7029.74 28.49 28.9528.9428.9527.8329.6029.55 27.6328.14 28.00 29.5529.66 29.02 29.11 29.16 29.4929.4429.5529.5829.5529.61 29.45 29.46 29.16 29.40 29.4429.2229.46 27.2727.9227.96 29.30 29.22 29.09 29.32 WATER29.06 29.2529.1328.9928.58 27.4429.15 26.9927.6127.5429.02 28.93WATER28.93 WATER28.86 29.03 BACK FLOW28.7929.17 29.2429.1028.9928.9929.01 28.78 29.23 29.3429.1429.0228.8729.05 28.85 28.9728.8928.9228.8928.9829.07 29.59 29.44 28.92 29.34 28.79 28.87 28.98 28.95MATCHLINE STA - 907+17.00 MATCHLINE STA - 909+76.00907+17.00-909+76.002022242628303220242832SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW908+00909+0015" RCP14"X23" ERCP12" EX-WM12" EX-WM8" EX-SS8" EX-SSEX-SS-11EXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET9OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - S 9THSTSTA. 907+17.00 TO STA. 909+76.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 91091191215" RCPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-SS8" EX-SS12" EX-WMParcel No. 78570040001MIRALLES, MIRADISMIRALLES, GUILLERMOParcel No. 78570080003MIRALLES, MIRADISParcel No. 78570120002MIRALLES, MIRADISParcel No. 78570160004MIRALLES, MIRADISParcel No. 78570200003MIRALLES SR. ALFREDOParcel No. 78570240005CASTRO, BONIFACIO & ESMERALDAParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARYOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEGRASS8" EX-SSX-R/WX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 9TH ST30.00 30.1430.06 30.20 30.23 30.41 30.45 30.73 30.59 30.92 30.67 31.00 29.33 29.7229.7329.6928.5630.5430.67 28.98 29.9029.8829.7328.3830.4330.58 28.05 30.08 30.19 30.2530.39 28.57 29.5729.59 29.48 28.12 30.0529.8329.83 28.25 29.5229.57 29.5729.3428.9628.9027.9229.7029.74 30.37 30.23 29.53 29.76 30.04 30.31 30.11 30.32 30.66 MATCHLINE STA - 909+76.00 MATCHLINE STA - 912+35.00909+76.00-912+35.002224262830323422242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW910+00911+00912+0015" RCP12" EX-WMEX-SS-9EXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET10OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - S 9THSTSTA. 909+76.00 TO STA. 912+35.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 912913914???" ERCPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-SS6" EX-WMParcel No. 78570040001MIRALLES, MIRADISMIRALLES, GUILLERMOParcel No. 78570080003MIRALLES, MIRADISParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARYOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE8" EX-SS12" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 9TH STCOLORADO AVE30.59 30.9230.67 31.00 30.67 30.77 30.65 31.02 30.83 30.66 30.7030.71 29.93 30.61 30.59 30.46 30.60 30.69 30.75 30.03 28.52 28.53 30.4030.3630.2228.7430.73 29.33 29.7229.7329.6928.5630.5430.67 28.98 29.8829.7328.3830.4330.58 30.65 30.85 30.54 30.75 29.95 30.37 30.53 30.76 30.60 30.6430.54 30.45 30.51 30.34 30.41 30.5330.5530.54 30.55 30.4730.4230.32 30.32 30.29 30.27 30.30 30.31 30.57 30.58 30.6030.58 30.60 30.00 30.18 30.43 30.51 30.39 30.85 30.6830.33 30.11 30.32 30.54 30.46 30.5230.23 30.67 30.46 30.78 30.66 30.75 30.73 30.8130.82 31.27 WATER30.98 WATER30.56 WATER30.55 30.54 30.61 28.53 30.12 30.90 31.1830.82 30.70 30.63 30.41 30.51 30.5530.57 30.46 30.51 30.49 30.4730.42 29.84 30.52 30.1430.2230.33 30.32 30.39 30.50 30.44 30.3530.39 30.52 30.6030.59 30.7830.77 MATCHLINE STA - 912+35.00912+35.00-914+00.002224262830323422242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW913+0014"X23" ERCP6" EX-WMEX-SS-7EXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET11OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - S 9THSTSTA. 912+35.00 TO STA. 914+00.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 15015115290012" CMP 12" CMP12" CMP18" CMPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-WM6" EX-WM8" EX-WM8" EX-SS6" EX-FM8" EX-FM 12" EX-WMParcel No. 65071320000MARINO, SALLY AParcel No. 65071280001PUENTE, SYLVIAParcel No. 65071240009PEREZ, DELFINAOE OE OE OEOEOE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOE GRASSGRAVELGRAVEL8" EX-SS8" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ EUSTUS AVESANITATIONROADW EUSTIS AVES 9TH ST 27.1527.4027.1026.3424.4726.5927.0626.5226.4925.9325.7824.2824.2324.0027.2427.4327.2727.2826.7226.6826.8427.1327.1523.64SAN26.80SAN26.79SAN26.88SAN26.9226.8027.2227.3026.7027.0926.6326.9626.7026.7927.0427.0327.1524.3126.0026.7526.6226.4526.5926.7526.7124.6724.49WATER27.0826.7526.7626.8026.8026.7827.1827.0126.8626.2326.2726.2626.2126.2527.1927.1526.8726.7726.9927.0827.1826.7026.8226.9226.8427.0826.6426.1526.6526.8326.9226.7326.2626.2925.5826.3726.3526.3126.3326.3623.8226.8726.8126.8126.8325.8525.8426.4426.3726.5424.7226.3124.8725.8926.2925.50WATER25.6025.9926.08WATER26.6026.5526.3024.7224.7826.5326.5226.4826.3826.2026.6026.7726.6326.5126.1626.1326.5626.5124.7324.7226.3824.9626.0825.8625.7826.5024.6126.5226.3526.5126.3626.5126.4826.8826.8827.0727.0627.3627.3127.0426.8826.7826.9426.3826.5626.4627.1526.7927.0126.7826.1526.10MATCHLINE STA - 152+40.0019202224262830321920242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS151+00152+0012" CMP12" CMP12" CMP6" EX-FM8" EX-WMEXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET12OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - EUSTISAVESTA. 150+00.00 TO STA. 152+40.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 15215315412" CMP12" CMP12" CMP12" CMP12" CMPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-WM8" EX-SS6" EX-FMParcel No. 65071520004SUMMIT TAX PARTNERS LLCParcel No. 65071480005AYALA, JESUSParcel No. 65071440003MARTINEZ, FRANCISCOParcel No. 65071400001AYALA, ZAMUELParcel No. 65071360002AYALA, SAMUELParcel No. 65071320000MARINO, SALLY AParcel No. 65071280001PUENTE, SYLVIAOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEGRAVELGRAVELGRAVELCONC.CONC.8" EX-SS8" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ EUSTUS AVE26.6627.1526.5727.0826.7827.2026.3726.3526.3126.3326.3623.8226.9626.8626.4026.5824.4823.9726.9226.6126.3926.7124.4023.7926.4426.4326.4026.4123.9726.4326.9626.8026.3525.9825.01SAN26.7826.5526.2726.2726.3026.3226.5126.5424.6024.6626.7124.8126.3625.8125.92WATER25.9425.8826.4824.7825.0025.9025.7826.5926.5126.4226.4626.5326.5726.5526.3826.4526.4626.3726.3924.8424.94WATER26.5326.5125.9026.0826.0124.8026.6126.4626.5526.7726.6826.5326.4926.4426.3726.5424.7224.7326.3124.8725.8926.2925.50WATER25.6025.9926.08WATER26.6026.5526.3024.7224.7826.5326.5226.4826.3826.2026.6026.77MATCHLINE STA - 152+40.00 MATCHLINE STA - 154+66.001920222426283032 1920242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS153+00154+0012" CMP12" CMP12" CMP12" CMP8" EX-WM6" EX-FMEX-SS-2EXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET13OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - EUSTISAVESTA. 152+40.00 TO STA. 154+66.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 15515615712" CMP12" CMP12" CMPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-SS6" EX-FMParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071600005GONZALEZ, IRENEParcel No. 65071560006HUAPILLA, GENAROParcel No. 65071520004SUMMIT TAX PARTNERS LLCParcel No. 65071480005AYALA, JESUSParcel No. 65071520004SUMMIT TAX PARTNERS LLCParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOECONC.CONC.ASPH.GRASS8" EX-SSX-R/WX-R/W¡ EUSTUS AVE26.6627.1526.9626.8026.3525.9825.0126.9026.7826.5226.4625.1624.8826.5826.5826.5926.5526.81SD26.3826.8426.4426.2526.5326.9126.6926.3826.3026.1026.6226.4126.6927.0326.4925.9326.9326.6526.6927.2126.5826.6027.0327.0026.7026.4626.3726.3924.84WATER26.5326.5125.9026.0826.0124.8026.6126.7326.7426.4626.5526.9826.7024.4026.5626.9826.7024.4026.5626.6526.4124.3426.5427.0127.2627.2427.1226.4726.5226.4924.3826.7826.7525.8925.6626.4626.9226.5326.6126.8526.5226.6826.7023.5324.0426.9027.0426.7126.5526.4325.9523.7723.7326.6226.6226.6626.2926.5126.6223.53MATCHLINE STA - 154+66.00 MATCHLINE STA - 157+40.0019202224262830321920242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS155+00156+00157+0012" CMP12" CMP6" EX-FM8" EX-WMEX-SS-3EXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET14OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - EUSTISAVESTA. 154+66.00 TO STA. 157+40.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 15715815916012" CMP15" CMP12" CMP15" CMP15" CMP24" CMPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-WM8" EX-SS6" EX-FMParcel No. 65071840001THOMAS, CLEOParcel No. 65071800009VELASCO, JACINTO MParcel No. 65071760000VELASCO, JACINTO M & ILDAParcel No. 65071720008GARZA JR, ALBERTOParcel No. 65071680009GARZA, RICARDOParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEGRASSASPH.CONC.CONC.GRAVEL8" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ EUSTUS AVE27.0326.9326.6526.6927.2126.5826.6027.0327.0026.7027.0926.9426.7226.7226.8927.5726.9126.9427.1627.2626.4527.0326.8726.8327.1627.2126.4325.9523.7723.7326.6226.6226.6626.2926.5126.6223.53WATER25.4625.3925.0026.4926.4023.9525.1926.4123.2926.5526.5426.6826.8626.7026.7122.8925.19WATER26.5626.4524.8625.3626.1225.8923.7826.5826.6225.9023.7023.7826.4726.6026.3926.1926.32WATER26.2726.2126.3726.2926.4426.7126.5126.3526.1426.0023.8623.4723.67WATER25.4825.4625.1025.2725.3024.9323.9426.4326.5126.3626.4525.7425.5725.5725.7326.4026.0423.9724.12WATER25.2225.44MATCHLINE STA - 157+40.00 MATCHLINE STA - 159+75.001920222426283032 1920242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS158+00159+0012" CMP15" CMP12" CMP15" CMP6" EX-FMEX-SS-48" EX-WMEXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET15OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - EUSTISAVESTA. 157+40.00 TO STA. 159+75.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 16016116215" CMPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-WM8" EX-SS6" EX-FMParcel No. 65071960004BYRD, ANNIE PEARLParcel No. 65071920002MOSS, ELLA MAE HOWARDParcel No. 65071880003AGUILAR, JOSE GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071840001THOMAS, CLEOParcel No. 65070040006HOWARD, DORCAS FRANKLINParcel No. 65070040006HOWARD, DORCAS FRANKLINOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEGRAVELCONC.PAVERS8" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/WX-R/WX-R/W¡ EUSTUS AVE27.0326.8726.8327.1627.2127.0827.0226.4126.3427.3225.4825.4625.1025.2725.3024.9323.9426.4326.5126.4525.7425.5725.5725.7326.4026.0423.9724.12WATER25.2225.4424.7724.7725.7125.7125.6626.5426.0325.9426.5725.6125.5725.8326.4326.5627.0626.4427.8527.1826.4226.6627.0127.0027.0826.3226.2325.8325.3125.5925.6026.1026.6426.5926.0825.9425.8826.0125.9325.8825.9225.8125.8025.8325.8625.8425.9025.9425.9626.2425.7826.1626.5327.1026.9126.8826.7026.7927.0826.63MATCHLINE STA - 159+75.00 MATCHLINE STA - 162+43.001920222426283032 1920242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS160+00161+00162+0015" CMP8" EX-WM6" EX-FMEXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET16OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - EUSTISAVESTA. 159+75.00 TO STA. 162+43.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 162163163511 511FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW 8" EX-WM8" EX-SS6" EX-FMParcel No. 65071960004BYRD, ANNIE PEARLParcel No. 65070040006HOWARD, DORCAS FRANKLINParcel No. 65070040006HOWARD, DORCAS FRANKLINOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEPAVERS8" EX-SS8" EX-WM6" EX-FMX-R/WX-R/W¡ EUSTUS AVE¡ S 5TH STS 5TH ST27.8527.1826.4226.6627.0127.0027.0826.3226.2325.8325.3125.5925.6026.1026.6426.5926.0825.9425.8826.0125.9325.8825.9225.8125.8025.8325.8625.8425.9025.9425.9626.2426.1225.9725.85WATER26.0625.5626.0426.5025.7925.4725.8825.7826.1626.5327.1026.9126.8826.7026.7927.0826.7426.7226.8426.8126.7926.8426.8526.7726.5926.6326.90WATER26.5326.7826.6626.8126.7826.7426.9226.8726.8126.7326.7526.8326.8025.9626.6327.1527.1326.6426.6326.5427.0426.6026.6226.7126.5626.6526.6426.5226.4026.3626.4726.5226.5626.5426.4426.4026.3626.0126.5726.2426.0425.8425.8425.5725.5825.5925.5525.5926.3426.3426.3826.4326.38SAN26.9826.8427.13WATER27.12WATER27.0127.1427.1727.3327.3026.7526.7126.6926.7226.7226.73WATER26.84WATER26.9526.3127.2326.9727.0026.9925.1626.9227.0326.8927.1327.2627.2327.3627.5026.8427.1326.9426.7126.8226.8726.8826.9226.8726.5526.6526.6026.6826.8726.8626.8926.8726.8626.5826.5726.5726.6027.2525.7325.6827.0025.2526.84MATCHLINE STA - 162+43.001920222426283032 1920242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS163+008" EX-WM6" EX-FMEX-SS-1EXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET17OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - EUSTISAVESTA. 162+43.00 TO STA. 163+39.50DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 50150250315" RCP15" RCPWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWParcel No. 00134120005LOUISSAINT, ANTONIOParcel No. 00132920003SCHOOL DISTRICT-BECBETHUNE ED CENTERParcel No. 65073160006J BRIAN HOMES LLCParcel No. 65073200005LEE ET UX, ALBERTParcel No. 65073240007LEE ET UX, ALBERTParcel No. 65073280009GARDENER, FREDONIA SParcel No. 65073320008FREEMAN JR, ERNEST NParcel No. 65073320008FREEMAN JR, ERNEST NParcel No. 65073160006J BRIAN HOMES LLC00133000003JOSEPH, ROLANDParcel No.CONC.CONC.CONC.6" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 5TH STBETHUNEEDUCATIONCENTER25.35 25.1425.1725.1925.18 25.1925.1925.1925.0824.9324.77 25.0424.9524.7324.6624.6325.0124.9724.9124.9624.9825.0325.5226.45 25.4826.33 25.9726.33 25.0025.3125.7226.0026.35 26.00 25.75 24.9325.6225.73 26.25 25.66 24.92 26.61 25.74 25.40 24.9824.89 25.14 WATER25.40 WATER24.99 25.66 25.86 26.26 25.94 24.95 25.0224.64 24.5224.36 SAN24.91 25.89 25.38 25.05 24.74 25.69 25.28 25.24 25.12 24.90 24.9124.9424.99 25.06 24.97 24.80 SAN25.32 25.08 25.02 25.0425.10 25.01 25.01 25.07 25.16 25.11 25.13 25.1025.1225.12 25.12 25.14 25.00 24.94 24.86 24.96 WATER25.11 WATER25.26 WATER25.19 WATER25.19 25.1425.0925.0225.0525.34 25.12 25.18 25.16 25.2525.24 25.24 25.18 WATER25.03 24.94 24.69 24.6724.46 24.63 24.79 24.63 24.45 24.46 24.37 24.53 24.95 22.82 23.05 25.18 24.94 22.86 WATER24.4424.32 24.59 24.49 24.80 24.84 25.28 25.13 24.93 24.7924.61 24.71 24.30 24.52 24.69 24.86 25.23 25.18 25.45 25.2825.17 25.06 25.11 24.95 WATER25.00 24.9724.94 24.96 24.98 24.95 24.90 WATER24.99 25.0425.11 25.16 25.14 25.1424.9325.17 21.86 24.71 22.13 25.28 24.43 24.77 24.85 23.02 25.25 24.88 25.18 24.88 25.11 25.1225.3625.15MATCHLINE STA - 503+35.00500+60.00-503+19.002022242628303220242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW501+00502+00503+0015" RCP15" RCP6" EX-WMEXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET18OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - S 5THST1 STA. 500+60.00 TO STA. 503+35.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 50350450550615" RCP15" RCPWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW6" EX-WMParcel No. 66930760001FEDERICO CARMONA LLCParcel No. 00133000003LEGRAND EST, FRANCKParcel No. 00133000003JOSEPH, ROLANDParcel No. 65073000001WOULARD JR, PAUL LParcel No. 65073040003WHITE, LESLIEParcel No. 65073080005TOMAS, CLEMENTE FRANCISCOParcel No. 65073120004OXIZIUS EST, FERDINANDParcel No. 65073160006J BRIAN HOMES LLCParcel No. 65072960003J BRIAN RESIDENTIAL RENTALSParcel No. 65073160006J BRIAN HOMES LLC00133000003JOSEPH, ROLANDParcel No.CONC.ASPH.ASPH.ASPH.DIRTX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 5TH ST25.1324.93 25.18 25.45 25.2825.17 25.06 25.1124.95WATER25.0024.7122.1325.2824.43 24.77 24.8523.0224.40 24.64 24.7623.05 25.2425.2524.8824.9624.8824.6524.6324.4324.3324.45 24.4924.3024.4124.73 25.20WATER24.5424.95 24.49 25.2324.7724.6524.3824.1624.44 24.49 25.4322.9224.34 24.51 25.12 24.56 24.4524.58 24.5624.3223.98 25.3025.47 25.80 25.50 SAN25.66 25.25 25.40 25.47 25.45 25.47 25.4125.3425.18 24.88 25.1125.1225.3625.15 25.57 25.5525.5225.5925.44 25.61 25.65 25.6625.7825.7025.6225.56 25.55 25.53 25.56 25.53 25.38 25.42 25.5925.5425.58 25.54 25.46 WATER25.45 25.47 25.42 25.25 25.26 25.1425.1225.39 25.40 25.04 WATER25.45 25.07 25.4125.4124.6325.3925.4725.4525.78 25.80 25.48 25.19 25.13 25.61 25.7625.7725.4625.1625.5025.6425.91 26.4925.37 25.03 24.82 25.12 24.99 24.76 24.75 24.97 25.01 25.08 25.63 25.61 WATER25.0725.07 24.40 25.33 25.33 25.34 25.30 25.2824.62 26.20 25.93 25.85 25.61 25.54 25.60 25.54 25.98 25.73 25.8226.00 25.73 25.89 25.89 25.80 26.19 26.09 26.1626.2226.22 MATCHLINE STA - 503+35.00 MATCHLINE STA - 505+95.00503+19.00-505+78.002022242628303220242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW504+00505+0015" RCP6" EX-WMEXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET19OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - S 5THST2 STA. 503+35.00 TO STA. 505+95.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 506507508WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW6" EX-WMParcel No. 66930080008SOLIS, JOEL PEDROParcel No. 66930760001FEDERICO CARMONA LLCParcel No. 65072960003J BRIAN RESIDENTIAL RENTALSParcel No. 65070240000HOWARD, HUEY P & DORCAS FParcel No. 65072960003J BRIAN RESIDENTIAL RENTALSParcel No. 65072960003J BRIAN RESIDENTIAL RENTALSParcel No. 66930760001FEDERICO CARMONA LLCDIRT6" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 5TH STPALMETTO AVECARVER ST26.39 26.48 26.07 25.3325.3425.30 24.6226.20 25.93 25.85 25.7325.8925.89 25.8026.19 26.0926.1626.2226.22 WATER25.7425.8326.04 26.0126.09 25.9926.07 26.03 25.9325.93 25.96 25.6225.76 25.74 25.88 25.69SAN26.00 26.1326.2826.1125.9826.1325.96 25.95 25.61 25.60 25.57 25.94 25.61 25.79 25.93 26.0126.32 25.46 25.6925.64 25.66 25.70 25.68 25.96 25.35 25.19 25.66 25.48 25.32 22.6422.38 SAN26.21 26.37 26.20 25.9326.0025.88 25.90 25.93 26.08WATER25.93 25.85 25.9425.89 25.7925.83 26.2226.24 27.07 25.39 25.19 23.08 24.52 25.28 25.36 22.7225.73 25.23 25.59 25.54 25.19 24.88 25.06 24.89 25.8126.31 26.30 25.83 25.90 25.78 25.84 25.84 25.57 25.6325.64 25.80 25.95 25.71 26.1826.13 25.77 25.87 24.88 26.4126.1526.0725.82 26.33 25.71 25.76 25.7625.73 25.73 26.36 25.61 25.71 25.57 25.79 26.14 25.95 26.4226.71 26.77 26.51 26.4026.51 26.33 26.21 26.12 26.1126.22 26.24 26.1026.3926.16 WATER26.15 26.12 25.70 25.9825.99 25.6425.67 MATCHLINE STA - 505+95.00 MATCHLINE STA - 508+37.00505+78.00-508+37.002022242628303220242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW506+00507+00508+006" EX-WM6" EX-WMEXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET20OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSEXISTING CONDITIONS - S 5THST3 STA. 505+95.00 TO STA. 508+37.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_EX-CON 150 90090190212" CMP18" CMPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SANSSSSSSSSSFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-WM6" EX-WM8" EX-WM6" EX-FM 8" EX-FM8" EX-FM8" EX-WM12" EX-WM Parcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARYOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOELIMEROCKS-90218" EX-FM8" EX-WM8" EX-WM X-R/WX-R/W¡ S 9TH STWATERSANSANSANSANWATERS-900519 LF18" RCPSANITATIONROADW EUSTIS AVES 9TH STS-150625 LF15" RCPS-1504S-9003TIE TO EXISTINGASPHALTSIDEWALKTIE TO EXISTINGASPHALTSIDEWALKADJGUY WIRESADJWSMATCHLINE STA - 901+99.00899+40.00-901+99.002022242628303220242832FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW900+00901+0018" CMP8" EX-FM8" EX-FM8" EX-WM18" RCPS-9005STA 900+46.87 (-17.50 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 25.81FL 22.10 SEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCHS-9003STA 900+25.99 (-17.57 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 201 - Type 7Manhole (1 or 2-Piece Cover(Center), Round Bottom)EL = 26.46FL 24.00 N1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET21OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - S 9TH STSTA. 899+40.00 TO STA. 901+99.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 90290390418" RCPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SANSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-FM12" EX-WMParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARYOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOELIMEROCKS-9023S-902142 LF18" RCP8" EX-SSX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 9TH STWATERWATERWATERWATERADJFHMATCHLINE STA - 901+99.00 MATCHLINE STA - 904+58.00901+99.00-904+58.002022242628303220242832FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW902+00903+00904+0018" RCP8" EX-FM12" EX-WM8" EX-WM8" EX-SS18" RCPS-9023STA 902+51.01 (-17.37 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 25.97FL 22.50 SS-9021STA 902+06.54 (-18.03 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 25.96FL 22.49 NEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCH1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET22OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - S 9TH STSTA. 901+99.00 TO STA. 904+58.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 90590690714"X23" ERCP14"X23" ERCP18" RCPSANSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-SS8" EX-SS12" EX-WMParcel No. 78570400007TORRES, MARIA INEZParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARYOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEASPH.S-9070S-906129 LF18" RCP12" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 9TH STWATERW DELAWARE AVES-9065S-906753 LF18" RCP14 LF18" RCPMATCHLINE STA - 904+58.00 MATCHLINE STA - 907+17.00904+58.00-907+17.002022242628303220242832SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW905+00906+00907+008" EX-SS12" EX-WM14"X23" ERCP18" RCP18" RCPS-9070STA 907+10.96 (-20.92 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 28.11FL 24.90 NFL 24.90 SS-9061STA 906+08.16 (-18.97 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 27.05FL 23.94 NEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCHS-9067STA 906+79.33 (-21.10 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 201 - Type 7Manhole (1 or 2-Piece Cover(Center), Round Bottom)EL = 27.96FL 24.75 NFL 24.75 SS-9065STA 906+62.78 (-21.20 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 27.89FL 24.68 NFL 24.68 S18" RCP18" RCP1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET23OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - S 9TH STSTA. 904+58.00 TO STA. 907+17.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 90790890991015" RCP14"X23" ERCPSANSANSANSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-SS8" EX-SS8" EX-SS12" EX-WM12" EX-WMParcel No. 78570240005CASTRO, BONIFACIO & ESMERALDAParcel No. 78570280007RODRIGUEZ JR, RAYMOND=& LILIAParcel No. 78570320006RODRIGUEZ JR, RAYMOND=& LILIAParcel No. 78570360008RODRIGUEZ JR, RAYMOND=& LILIAParcel No. 78570400007TORRES, MARIA INEZParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARYOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEASPH.GRAVELS-9070S-9081S-9091S-907769 LF15" RCP76 LF18" RCP29 LF18" RCP8" EX-SS8" EX-SS8" EX-SSX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 9TH STWATERWATERWATERBACK FLOWADJFHMATCHLINE STA - 907+17.00 MATCHLINE STA - 909+76.00907+17.00-909+76.002022242628303220242832SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW908+00909+0015" RCP14"X23" ERCP12" EX-WM12" EX-WM8" EX-SS8" EX-SS15" RCP18" RCPS-9081STA 908+32.05 (-20.44 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 28.33FL 25.38 NS-9091STA 909+03.51 (-18.46 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 28.07FL 25.38 SS-9077STA 907+88.84 (-20.37 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 28.36FL 25.00 SEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCH1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET24OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - S 9TH STSTA. 907+17.00 TO STA. 909+76.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 91091191215" RCPSANSANSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-SS8" EX-SS12" EX-WMParcel No. 78570040001MIRALLES, MIRADISMIRALLES, GUILLERMOParcel No. 78570080003MIRALLES, MIRADISParcel No. 78570120002MIRALLES, MIRADISParcel No. 78570160004MIRALLES, MIRADISParcel No. 78570200003MIRALLES SR. ALFREDOParcel No. 78570240005CASTRO, BONIFACIO & ESMERALDAParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARYOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEGRASSS-9111S-911764 LF15" RCP8" EX-SSX-R/WX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 9TH STADJFHMATCHLINE STA - 909+76.00 MATCHLINE STA - 912+35.00909+76.00-912+35.002224262830323422242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW910+00911+00912+0015" RCP12" EX-WM15" RCPS-9111STA 911+03.34 (-19.09 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 28.65FL 26.45 NS-9117STA 911+68.95 (-18.72 Lt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 28.93FL 26.45 SEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCH1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET25OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - S 9TH STSTA. 909+76.00 TO STA. 912+35.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 91291391414"X23" ERCPSANSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-SS6" EX-WMParcel No. 78570040001MIRALLES, MIRADISMIRALLES, GUILLERMOParcel No. 78570080003MIRALLES, MIRADISParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARYOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOES-91178" EX-SS12" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 9TH STWATERWATERWATERCOLORADO AVEMATCHLINE STA - 912+35.00912+35.00-914+00.002224262830323422242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW913+0014"X23" ERCP6" EX-WMEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCH1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET26OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - S 9TH STSTA. 912+35.00 TO STA. 914+00.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 15015115290012" CMP 12" CMP12" CMP18" CMPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SANSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-WM6" EX-WM8" EX-WM8" EX-SS6" EX-FM8" EX-FM 12" EX-WMParcel No. 65071320000MARINO, SALLY AParcel No. 65071280001PUENTE, SYLVIAParcel No. 65071240009PEREZ, DELFINAOE OE OE OEOEOE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOE GRASSGRAVELGRAVELS-1512S-1510S-152043 LF15" RCP58 LF15" RCP8" EX-SS8" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ EUSTIS AVESANSANSANSANWATERWATERWATER19 LF18" RCPSANITATIONROADW EUSTIS AVESAWCUT PAVEMENTAT EDGELINES 9TH ST S-150625 LF15" RCPS-1504S-9003TIE TO EXISTINGASPHALTSIDEWALKTIE TO EXISTINGASPHALTSIDEWALKADJGUY WIRESRELOCATEMAILBOXADJWSADJWSMATCHLINE STA - 152+20.001920222426283032 1920242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)151+00152+0012" CMP12" CMP12" CMP6" EX-FM8" EX-WM15" RCP15" RCPS-1512STA 151+74.20 (26.39 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 26.67FL 23.07 WFL 23.07 ES-1510STA 151+29.25 (26.25 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 26.69FL 23.18 ES-1506STA 150+57.65 (25.85 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 25.31FL 22.58 W15" RCPS-1504STA 150+30.27 (22.34 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 201 - Type 7Manhole (1 or 2-Piece Cover(Center), Rectangular Bottom)EL = 26.25FL 24.06 EEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCH1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET27OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - EUSTIS AVESTA. 150+00.00 TO STA. 152+40.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 15215315412" CMP12" CMP12" CMP12" CMP12" CMPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SANSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-WM8" EX-SS6" EX-FMParcel No. 65071520004SUMMIT TAX PARTNERS LLCParcel No. 65071480005AYALA, JESUSParcel No. 65071440003MARTINEZ, FRANCISCOParcel No. 65071400001AYALA, ZAMUELParcel No. 65071360002AYALA, SAMUELParcel No. 65071320000MARINO, SALLY AParcel No. 65071280001PUENTE, SYLVIAOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEGRAVELGRAVELGRAVELCONC.CONC.S-1540S-1522S-1530S-1542S-152058 LF15" RCP52 LF15" RCP66 LF15" RCP58 LF15" RCP69 LF15" RCP8" EX-SS8" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ EUSTIS AVESANWATERWATERWATERWATERSAWCUT PAVEMENTAT EDGELINERELOCATEMAILBOXRELOCATEMAILBOXRELOCATEMAILBOXRELOCATEMAILBOXADJWSADJSS LATADJSS MHADJWSADJWSADJWSADJWSADJSS LATADJSS LATRELOCATEMAILBOXMATCHLINE STA - 152+20.00 MATCHLINE STA - 154+66.001920222426283032 1920242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)153+00154+0012" CMP12" CMP12" CMP12" CMP8" EX-WM6" EX-FM15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCPS-1540STA 154+16.39 (26.25 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 26.66FL 22.06 WFL 21.96 ES-1522STA 152+88.20 (26.34 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 26.68FL 22.33 WFL 22.23 ES-1530STA 153+56.58 (26.10 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 26.68FL 22.19 WFL 22.09 EEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCHS-1520STA 152+34.04 (26.39 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 26.69FL 22.45 WFL 22.35 E1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET28OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - EUSTIS AVESTA. 152+40.00 TO STA. 154+66.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 15515615712" CMP12" CMP12" CMPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SANSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-SS6" EX-FMParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071600005GONZALEZ, IRENEParcel No. 65071560006HUAPILLA, GENAROParcel No. 65071520004SUMMIT TAX PARTNERS LLCParcel No. 65071480005AYALA, JESUSParcel No. 65071520004SUMMIT TAX PARTNERS LLCParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOECONC.CONC.ASPH.GRASSS-1542S-1550S-1560S-157069 LF15" RCP82 LF18" RCP34 LF18" RCP35 LF18" RCP56 LF18" RCP8" EX-SSX-R/WX-R/W¡ EUSTIS AVESDWATERSAWCUT PAVEMENTAT EDGELINERELOCATEMAILBOXRELOCATEMAILBOXADJWSADJWSADJWSADJSS MHADJSS LATADJSS LATADJSS LATADJSS LATADJSS LATADJSS LATADJSS LATDEFLECT6" FMS-156459 LF18" RCPMATCHLINE STA - 154+66.00 MATCHLINE STA - 157+40.001920222426283032 1920242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)155+00156+00157+0012" CMP12" CMP12" CMP6" EX-FM8" EX-WM18" RCP18" RCP18" RCP18" RCPS-1542STA 154+87.37 (26.42 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 26.65FL 21.93 WFL 21.83 ES-1550STA 155+71.58 (26.38 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 26.64FL 21.79 WFL 21.69 ES-1560STA 156+07.46 (27.03 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 25.32FL 21.66 WFL 21.56 ES-1570STA 157+05.33 (23.91 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 26.03FL 21.52 WFL 21.42 EEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCHS-1564STA 156+44.35 (24.06 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 25.94FL 21.54 WFL 21.54 E18" RCP1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET29OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - EUSTIS AVESTA. 154+66.00 TO STA. 157+40.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 15715815916012" CMP15" CMP12" CMP15" CMP15" CMP24" CMPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SANSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-WM8" EX-SS6" EX-FMParcel No. 65071840001THOMAS, CLEOParcel No. 65071800009VELASCO, JACINTO MParcel No. 65071760000VELASCO, JACINTO M & ILDAParcel No. 65071720008GARZA JR, ALBERTOParcel No. 65071680009GARZA, RICARDOParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEGRASSASPH.CONC.CONC.GRAVELS-1590S-1592S-1580S-1570S-157256 LF18" RCP84 LF18" RCP63 LF18" RCP37 LF18" RCP70 LF18" RCP8" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ EUSTIS AVEWATERWATERWATERWATERWATERSAWCUT PAVEMENTAT EDGELINERELOCATEMAILBOXRELOCATEMAILBOXRELOCATEMAILBOXADJWSADJWSADJWSADJWSADJSS LATADJ (2)SS LATADJSS LATADJSS MHMATCHLINE STA - 157+40.00 MATCHLINE STA - 159+75.001920222426283032 1920242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)158+00159+0012" CMP15" CMP15" CMP6" EX-FM8" EX-WM18" RCP18" RCP18" RCPS-1590STA 159+14.36 (24.42 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 25.97FL 21.11 WFL 21.01 ES-1592STA 159+53.26 (24.37 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 26.01FL 20.99 WFL 20.89 ES-1580STA 158+49.57 (24.28 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 25.98FL 21.25 WFL 21.15 ES-1572STA 157+63.31 (24.47 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 25.87FL 21.39 WFL 21.29 EEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCH1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET30OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - EUSTIS AVESTA. 157+40.00 TO STA. 159+75.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 16016116215" CMPFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SANSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW8" EX-WM8" EX-SS6" EX-FMParcel No. 65071960004BYRD, ANNIE PEARLParcel No. 65071920002MOSS, ELLA MAE HOWARDParcel No. 65071880003AGUILAR, JOSE GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071840001THOMAS, CLEOParcel No. 65070040006HOWARD, DORCAS FRANKLINParcel No. 65070040006HOWARD, DORCAS FRANKLINOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEGRAVELCONC.PAVERSS-1610S-160070 LF18" RCP44 LF18" RCP8" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/WX-R/WX-R/W¡ EUSTIS AVEWATERSAWCUT PAVEMENTAT EDGELINERELOCATEMAILBOXADJWSADJWSRESET BRICKPAVERS TO ADAREQUIREMENTSADJSS MHRESET BRICKPAVERS TO ADAREQUIREMENTSTIE INTOBRICKPAVERSMATCHLINE STA - 159+75.00 MATCHLINE STA - 162+43.001920222426283032 1920242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)160+00161+00162+0015" CMP8" EX-WM6" EX-FM18" RCP18" RCPS-1610STA 160+72.03 (24.88 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 26.02FL 20.70 WS-1600STA 160+25.52 (24.51 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 26.00FL 20.86 WFL 20.76 EEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCH1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET31OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - EUSTIS AVESTA. 159+75.00 TO STA. 162+43.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 162163163511 511FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)SANSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW 8" EX-WM8" EX-SS6" EX-FMParcel No. 65071960004BYRD, ANNIE PEARLParcel No. 65070040006HOWARD, DORCAS FRANKLINParcel No. 65070040006HOWARD, DORCAS FRANKLINOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEPAVERS8" EX-SS8" EX-WM6" EX-FMX-R/WX-R/W¡ EUSTIS AVE¡ S 5TH STWATERWATERSANWATERWATERWATERWATERTIE INTOEXISTINGCONCRETESIDEWALKS 5TH STADJWSRESET BRICKPAVERS TO ADAREQUIREMENTSRESET BRICKPAVERS TO ADAREQUIREMENTSTIE INTOBRICKPAVERSMATCHLINE STA - 162+43.001920222426283032 1920242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWFM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)FM(D)163+008" EX-WM6" EX-FM24" RCPEXIST ℄ ROAD1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET32OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - EUSTIS AVESTA. 162+43.00 TO STA. 163+39.50DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 50150250315" RCP15" RCPWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWParcel No. 00134120005LOUISSAINT, ANTONIOParcel No. 00132920003SCHOOL DISTRICT-BECBETHUNE ED CENTERParcel No. 65073160006J BRIAN HOMES LLCParcel No. 65073200005LEE ET UX, ALBERTParcel No. 65073240007LEE ET UX, ALBERTParcel No. 65073280009GARDENER, FREDONIA SParcel No. 65073320008FREEMAN JR, ERNEST NParcel No. 65073320008FREEMAN JR, ERNEST NParcel No. 65073160006J BRIAN HOMES LLC00133000003JOSEPH, ROLANDParcel No.CONC.CONC.CONC.6" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 5TH STWATERWATERSANSANWATERWATERWATERWATERWATERWATERWATERWATERS-5018S-5034S-5024S-502646 LF15" RCP64 LF15" RCPBETHUNEEDUCATIONCENTERADJ FMVALVE TOGRADERELOCATEMAILBOXMATCHLINE STA - 503+35.00500+60.00-503+35.002022242628303220242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW501+00502+00503+0015" RCP15" RCP6" EX-WM15" RCPS-5026STA 502+63.65 (19.17 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 24.39FL 21.93 NS-5024STA 502+39.62 (18.69 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 24.67FL 22.50 S15" RCPS-5018STA 501+91.90 (16.89 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 24.94FL 22.50 NS-5034STA 503+29.55 (18.79 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 24.49FL 21.94 SEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCH1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET33OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - S 5TH STSTA. 500+60.00 TO STA. 503+35.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 50350450550615" RCP15" RCPWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW6" EX-WMParcel No. 66930760001FEDERICO CARMONA LLCParcel No. 00133000003LEGRAND EST, FRANCKParcel No. 00133000003JOSEPH, ROLANDParcel No. 65073000001WOULARD JR, PAUL LParcel No. 65073040003WHITE, LESLIEParcel No. 65073080005TOMAS, CLEMENTE FRANCISCOParcel No. 65073120004OXIZIUS EST, FERDINANDParcel No. 65073160006J BRIAN HOMES LLCParcel No. 65072960003J BRIAN RESIDENTIAL RENTALSParcel No. 65073160006J BRIAN HOMES LLC00133000003JOSEPH, ROLANDParcel No.CONC.ASPH.ASPH.ASPH.DIRTX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 5TH STWATERWATERSANWATERWATERWATERS-5058S-5052S-5048S-5040S-5036S-503470 LF15" RCP42 LF15" RCP47 LF15" RCP64 LF15" RCPRELOCATEMAILBOXRELOCATEMAILBOXRELOCATEMAILBOXADJWATERSERVICEMATCHLINE STA - 503+35.00 MATCHLINE STA - 505+95.00503+35.00-505+95.002022242628303220242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW504+00505+0015" RCP6" EX-WMS-5040STA 504+05.98 (19.75 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 24.66FL 21.88 S15" RCPS-5036STA 503+56.89 (18.89 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 24.76FL 21.88 NS-5048STA 504+73.12 (19.15 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 24.88FL 22.70 N15" RCP15" RCPS-5052STA 505+17.08 (19.69 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 25.33FL 22.67 NFL 22.81 SS-5058STA 505+89.32 (19.42 Rt.)CONST. Index No. 232 - DitchBottom Inlet - Type CEL = 25.96FL 23.23 SEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCH1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET34OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - S 5TH STSTA. 503+35.00 TO STA. 505+95.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 506507508WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW6" EX-WMParcel No. 66930080008SOLIS, JOEL PEDROParcel No. 66930760001FEDERICO CARMONA LLCParcel No. 65072960003J BRIAN RESIDENTIAL RENTALSParcel No. 65070240000HOWARD, HUEY P & DORCAS FParcel No. 65072960003J BRIAN RESIDENTIAL RENTALSParcel No. 65072960003J BRIAN RESIDENTIAL RENTALSParcel No. 66930760001FEDERICO CARMONA LLCDIRT6" EX-WMX-R/WX-R/W¡ S 5TH STWATERSANSANWATERWATERS-5058PALMETTO AVECARVER STRELOCATEMAILBOXMATCHLINE STA - 505+95.00 MATCHLINE STA - 508+37.00505+95.00-508+37.002022242628303220242832WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW506+00507+00508+006" EX-WM6" EX-WMEXIST ℄ ROADPROP ℄ DITCH1" = 20' Horizontal1" = 2' VerticalABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'SHEET35OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSPLAN AND PROFILE - S 5TH STSTA. 505+95.00 TO STA. 508+37.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_ME01 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 36643659IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSGENERAL NOTESCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_NOTES -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 36643759OR APPROVED EQUALIMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSGENERAL NOTESCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_NOTES -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 36643859® ® ® ® ® ® ®IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSGENERAL NOTESCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_NOTES -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664SHEET39OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSTORMWATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLANS01DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SWPPP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664SHEET40OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSTORMWATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLANS02DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SWPPP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664SHEET41OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSTORMWATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLANS03DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SWPPP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664SHEET42OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSTORMWATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLANS04DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SWPPP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664SHEET43OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSTORMWATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLANS05DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRA750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142DATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SWPPP ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET44OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSTORMWATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLANSEROSION CONTROLDATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SWPPP750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142FlowNote: Bales to be staked at the direction of the Engineer.Loose Soil Placed By Shovel AndLightly Compacted Along UpstreamFace Of Bales.Type A Or B FenceBALES BACKED BY FENCE2-2" x 2" x 4' StakesAnd Lightly Compacted AlongAs RequiredSwale 50' On Centers ( Typ. )Overlap EndsFill SlopeFill SlopeBales To ButtFlowLoose Soil Placed By ShovelThe Upstream Edge Of Bales.PLANELEVATIONPLANELEVATION6' Min.Anchor Bales WithPer Bale.Anchor Bales With 2 - 2" x 2" x 4'Stakes Per Bale.BARRIERS FOR FILL SLOPESTO BE USED AT SELECTED SITES WHERE THE NATURALGROUND SLOPES TOWARD THE TOE OF SLOPETO BE USED AT SELECTED SITES WHERE THE NATURALGROUND SLOPES TOWARD THE TOE OF SLOPELoose Soil Placed By Shovel And LightlyCompacted Along The Upstream EdgeOf Bales.Woven Filter Fabric In Absence OfEstablished Grass (Approx. 12' x 12').Secure Edges By Entrenching AndExtend Under Bags and Bales. FabricShall Meet The Requirements OfSection 985 Of The StandardIncluded In The Contract Unit PriceFor Baled Hay Or Straw, TN.RailPost1' Min. Recommended5' Typ.5' Min.Sand Bags1' Min. Recommended5' Typ.Anchor Bales With 2 - 2" x 2" x 4' Stakes Per BaleFlow FlowPLAN PLANELEVATIONELEVATIONTYPE IITYPE Iconditions outlined in Chart I, Sheet 1 of 3, Index No. 102Loose Soil Placed By Shovel And Lightly Compacted Along BARRIER FOR UNPAVED DITCHESAnchor Lower Bales With 2 - 2" x 2" x 4' Stakes Per Bale.Anchor Top Bales To Lower Bales With 2 - 2" x 2" x 4' Stakes Per Bale.Application and Spacing: The use of Types I & II bale barriers should be limited to theSpecifications. Cost Of Fabric To BexPost Options: Wood Min. 0Oak8"15" to 18" 12" Min.Optional Post PositionsVertical Filter FabricSilt FlowPrinciple Post PositionSECTIONELEVATION6' Max.Wood 2" x 4"Filter Fabric (InConformance WithSteel 1.33 Lbs/Ft. Min.Sec. 985 FDOT Spec.)TYPE III OR TYPE IV SILT FENCE20°`(Canted 20° Toward Flow)3' Or MoreType III OR TYPE IV Silt FenceSilt FlowType III OR TYPE IV Silt FenceSi lt F low Around Ditch Bottom Inlets. Silt Fence ProtectionNote: Silt Fence to be paid for under the contract unit price for Staked Silt Fence (LF).Do not deploy in a manner that silt fences will act as a dam across permanent flowingwatercourses. Silt fences are to be used at upland locations and turbidity barriersused at permanent bodies of water.SILT FENCE APPLICATIONSstructures Sheet 2 of 3.Note: Spacing for Type ~~~ Fence to be inaccordance with Chart ~, Sheet 1 of 3and ditch installations at drainageThe Upstream Edge Of Bales.BAILED HAY OR STRAW BARRIER AND SILT FENCESSTRAW BALE DROP INLET SEDIMENT FILTER - WILL BEPLACED AROUND ALL CONSTRUCTED STORM DRAIN INLETSIMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ANDSHALL REMAIN IN-PLACE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTINGDRAINAGE AREA IS STABILIZED. ALTERNATIVELY, GRATEINLETS CAN BE COVERED WITH FILTER FABRIC MATERIALUNTIL STABILIZATION.TempDrainCurb &GutterRockBagsProposed InletRockBagsCurb &GutterDitchDitchSidewalkRiserOpenPARTIAL INLETCOMPLETED INLETDITCH BOTTOM INLETPROTECTION AROUND INLETS OR SIMILAR STRUCTURESGalvanized ChainGalvanized ChainStress PlateFLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIERSD2 D 1 DCurtain To Reach Bottom Up To Depths Of 10 Feet.122Two(2) Panels To Be Used For Depths Greater Than10 Feet Unless Special Depth Curtains Specifically CalledFor In The Plans Or As Determined By The Engineer.Slotted PVC Connector Pipe(Metal Collar Reinforced)Galvanized Connectors (Tool Free Disconnect)18 Oz. Nylon ReinforcedPVC Fabric (300 psi Test)D =5' Std. (Additional Panel For Depths 5').Polypro Rope(600 lb. BreakingStrength) Vinyl Sheathed EAW Steel Cable(9800 Lbs. Breaking Strength) WithClosed Cell Solid Plastic FoamPer Ft. Buoyancy)Flotation (8" Dia. Equiv.) (17 lbs.Closed Cell Solid Plastic FoamFlotation (6" Dia. Equiv.) (12 Lbs.Per Ft. Buoyancy)TYPE ~~TYPE I18 Oz. Nylon ReinforcedPVC Fabric (300 psiTest) With Lacing GrommetsD =5' Std. (Single Panel For Depths 5' or Less).NOTICE: COMPONENTS OF TYPES ~ AND ~~ MAY BE SIMILAR OR IDENTICALTO PROPRIETARY DESIGNS. ANY INFRINGEMENT ON THE PROPRIETARYRIGHTS OF THE DESIGNER SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OFTHE USER. SUBSTITUTIONS FOR TYPES ~ AND ~~ SHALL BE ASAPPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.1. FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIERS ARE TO BE PAID FOR UNDER THEGENERAL NOTES2. SILT FENCE TO BE PAID FOR UNDER THE CONTRACTCONTRACT UNIT PRICE FOR FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER, (LF).UNIT PRICE FOR STAKED SILT FENCE, (LF).FOR EROSION CONTROL APPLICATIONS3. REFER TO FLORIDA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MANUAL4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASED ON THE PROVISIONSOF THE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT.1651655814221"211"211" 900901902150Parcel No. 65071240009PEREZ, DELFINAParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARY90090190215012" WHITE24" WHITE12" WHITE24" WHITESTOPSTOPSANITATIONROADW EUSTIS AVES 9TH ST¡ S 9TH ST¡ S 9TH STNOTE:EXISTING PAVEMENTMARKINGS AND STREETSIGNS TO REMAIN UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTEDMATCHLINE STA - 902+07.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET45OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-S 9TH STSTA. 899+40.00 TO STA. 902+07.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 902903904Parcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARY902903904AHEADSPEEDLIMITSCHOOLWHENFLASHING 20END SCHOOL ZONE YOURSPEED¡ S 9TH STRE-STRIPESCHOOL MARKINGS(2 STOP BARS,PAVEMENT MESSAGE)MATCHLINE STA - 902+07.00 MATCHLINE STA - 904+74.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET46OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-S 9TH STSTA. 902+07.00 TO STA. 904+74.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 905906907Parcel No. 78570400007TORRES, MARIA INEZParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARY905906907STOPENDSCHOOLZONEYOURSPEED W DELAWARE AVE¡ S 9TH STSCHOOL MARKINGS(2 STOP BARS,PAVEMENT MESSAGE)RELOCATESTOP SIGNMATCHLINE STA - 904+74.00 MATCHLINE STA - 907+41.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET47OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-S 9TH STSTA. 904+74.00 TO STA. 907+41.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 908909910Parcel No. 78570200003MIRALLES SR. ALFREDOParcel No. 78570240005CASTRO, BONIFACIO & ESMERALDAParcel No. 78570280007RODRIGUEZ JR, RAYMOND=& LILIAParcel No. 78570320006RODRIGUEZ JR, RAYMOND=& LILIAParcel No. 78570360008RODRIGUEZ JR, RAYMOND=& LILIAParcel No. 78570400007TORRES, MARIA INEZParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARY90890991012" WHITE24" WHITE¡ S 9TH STRELOCATESTOP SIGNRE-STRIPE STOPBAR AND DBLYELLOW TO R/W LINERELOCATE MAINENTRANCE SIGNMAINENTRANCERELOCATESCHOOLCROSSING SIGNMATCHLINE STA - 907+41.00 MATCHLINE STA - 910+08.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET48OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-S 9TH STSTA. 907+41.00 TO STA. 910+08.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 910911912Parcel No. 78570040001MIRALLES, MIRADISMIRALLES, GUILLERMOParcel No. 78570080003MIRALLES, MIRADISParcel No. 78570120002MIRALLES, MIRADISParcel No. 78570160004MIRALLES, MIRADISParcel No. 78570200003MIRALLES SR. ALFREDOParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARY91091191212" WHITE24" WHITESTOP¡ S 9TH STRELOCATESTOP SIGNMATCHLINE STA - 910+08.00 MATCHLINE STA - 912+60.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET49OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-S 9TH STSTA. 910+08.00 TO STA. 912+60.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 912913914Parcel No. 78570040001MIRALLES, MIRADISMIRALLES, GUILLERMOParcel No. 78570080003MIRALLES, MIRADISParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARY91291391412" WHITE24" WHITESTOPSTOPCOLORADO AVE¡ S 9TH STRE-STRIPE ANDEXTEND CROSSWALKRELOCATESTOP SIGNRE-STRIPE STOPBAR AND DBLYELLOW TO R/W LINEMATCHLINE STA - 912+60.00 ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET50OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-S 9TH STSTA. 912+60.00 TO STA. 914+00.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 900 901150 151152Parcel No. 65071320000MARINO, SALLY AParcel No. 65071280001PUENTE, SYLVIAParcel No. 65071240009PEREZ, DELFINAParcel No. 00123880000SCHOOL DISTRICT-PCR PINECREST ELEMENTARY900901150 15115212" WHITE24" WHITE12" WHITE24" WHITESTOPSTOPSANITATIONROADW EUSTIS AVES 9TH ST ¡ S 9TH STMATCHLINE STA - 152+40.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET51OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-EUSTUSAVESTA. 150+00.00 TO STA. 152+40.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 152153154Parcel No. 65071520004SUMMIT TAX PARTNERS LLCParcel No. 65071480005AYALA, JESUSParcel No. 65071440003MARTINEZ, FRANCISCOParcel No. 65071400001AYALA, ZAMUELParcel No. 65071360002AYALA, SAMUELParcel No. 65071320000MARINO, SALLY AParcel No. 65071280001PUENTE, SYLVIA152153154¡ EUSTIS AVEMATCHLINE STA - 152+40.00 MATCHLINE STA - 154+66.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET52OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-EUSTUSAVESTA. 152+40.00 TO STA. 154+66.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 155156157Parcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071600005GONZALEZ, IRENEParcel No. 65071560006HUAPILLA, GENAROParcel No. 65071520004SUMMIT TAX PARTNERS LLCParcel No. 65071520004SUMMIT TAX PARTNERS LLCParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPE155156157¡ EUSTIS AVEMATCHLINE STA - 154+66.00 MATCHLINE STA - 157+40.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET53OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-EUSTUSAVESTA. 154+66.00 TO STA. 157+40.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 158159160Parcel No. 65071880003AGUILAR, JOSE GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071840001THOMAS, CLEOParcel No. 65071800009VELASCO, JACINTO MParcel No. 65071760000VELASCO, JACINTO M & ILDAParcel No. 65071720008GARZA JR, ALBERTOParcel No. 65071680009GARZA, RICARDOParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071640007GARZA, GUADALUPE158159160¡ EUSTIS AVEMATCHLINE STA - 157+40.00 MATCHLINE STA - 159+75.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET54OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-EUSTUSAVESTA. 157+40.00 TO STA. 159+75.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 160161162Parcel No. 65071960004BYRD, ANNIE PEARLParcel No. 65071920002MOSS, ELLA MAE HOWARDParcel No. 65071880003AGUILAR, JOSE GUADALUPEParcel No. 65071840001THOMAS, CLEOParcel No. 65071800009VELASCO, JACINTO MParcel No. 65070040006HOWARD, DORCAS FRANKLIN160161162¡ EUSTIS AVEMATCHLINE STA - 159+75.00 MATCHLINE STA - 162+43.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET55OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-EUSTUSAVESTA. 159+75.00 TO STA. 162+43.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 162163163511 511 Parcel No. 00136400008PREVITE, ANTHONY VParcel No. 65070040006HOWARD, DORCAS FRANKLINParcel No. 65070040006HOWARD, DORCAS FRANKLIN511 511 16216316312" WHITE24" WHITESTOPS 5TH ST¡ EUSTIS AVE¡ S 5TH STMATCHLINE STA - 162+43.00 ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET56OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-EUSTUSAVESTA. 162+43.00 TO STA. 163+39.50DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 501502503Parcel No. 00134120005LOUISSAINT, ANTONIOParcel No. 00132920003SCHOOL DISTRICT-BECBETHUNE ED CENTERParcel No. 65073160006J BRIAN HOMES LLCParcel No. 65073200005LEE ET UX, ALBERTParcel No. 65073240007LEE ET UX, ALBERTParcel No. 65073280009GARDENER, FREDONIA SParcel No. 65073320008FREEMAN JR, ERNEST NParcel No. 65073320008FREEMAN JR, ERNEST NParcel No. 65073160006J BRIAN HOMES LLC00133000003JOSEPH, ROLANDParcel No.50150250312" WHITE24" WHITEBETHUNEEDUCATIONCENTER¡ S 5TH STMATCHLINE STA - 503+27.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET57OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-S 5TH STSTA. 500+60.00 TO STA. 503+27.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 504505506Parcel No. 66930760001FEDERICO CARMONA LLCParcel No. 00133000003LEGRAND EST, FRANCKParcel No. 00133000003JOSEPH, ROLANDParcel No. 65073000001WOULARD JR, PAUL LParcel No. 65073040003WHITE, LESLIEParcel No. 65073080005TOMAS, CLEMENTE FRANCISCOParcel No. 65073120004OXIZIUS EST, FERDINANDParcel No. 65073160006J BRIAN HOMES LLCParcel No. 65072960003J BRIAN RESIDENTIAL RENTALSParcel No. 65073160006J BRIAN HOMES LLC00133000003JOSEPH, ROLANDParcel No.Parcel No. 66930760001FEDERICO CARMONA LLC504505506AHEADAHEAD ¡ S 5TH STRE-STRIPESCHOOL MARKINGS(2 STOP BARS,PAVEMENT MESSAGE)MATCHLINE STA - 503+27.00 MATCHLINE STA - 505+94.00ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET58OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-S 5TH STSTA. 503+27.00 TO STA. 505+94.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 506507508Parcel No. 66930080008SOLIS, JOEL PEDROCARVER STREET (60' ROW)Parcel No. 66930760001FEDERICO CARMONA LLCParcel No. 65072960003J BRIAN RESIDENTIAL RENTALSParcel No. 65070240000HOWARD, HUEY P & DORCAS FParcel No. 65072960003J BRIAN RESIDENTIAL RENTALSParcel No. 65072960003J BRIAN RESIDENTIAL RENTALSParcel No. 66930760001FEDERICO CARMONA LLC50650750812" WHITE24" WHITESTOPPALMETTO AVECARVER ST¡ S 5TH STRE-STRIPESTOP BARMATCHLINE STA - 505+94.00 ABBRUNDAGE, INC.ARBER &GNOLIProfessional Engineers, Planners & Land SurveyorsCollier County: 7400 Tamiami Trail N. - Naples, FL - 34108Certificate of Authorization Nos. LB 3664 and EB 3664N1" = 20'-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SHEET59OF59IMMOKALEE SIDEWALKIMPROVEMENTSSIGNING AND MARKING-S 5TH STSTA. 505+94.00 TO STA. 508+40.00DATENO.REVISIONSBYCOLLIER COUNTY IMMOKALEE CRADATE:December 2016PLAN STAGE:60%PROJECT No:16-0082ABB FILE:11618--PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPLOT STYLE:FDOT.stbDESIGNED BY:EFTDRAWN BY:MJCCHECKED BY:DWBREVIEWED BY:REVIEWEDFILE NAME:11618_SM750 SOUTH FIFTH STREETNAPLES, FL 34142 2016 Annual Report Mission Statement: “Those of us who live and work in Immokalee envision a future for our town. We see new business and job opportunities in international trade and distribution, agri-business, ecotourism, recreation and entertainment, and the construction industry. We see Immokalee as an attractive, sustainable community with affordable workforce housing, parks and outstanding schools – a place where people walk and bicycle to do their errands, and where parents are returning to school to finish their education and master new job skills. Main Street will have a Latin flavor – colorful plazas, outdoor cafes, shops and entertainment – attracting both the local community and the tourists who come to explore our unique ecology or entertainment at the Casino.” History of Immokalee …………………………………………… 1 CRA Staff …………………………………………………………… 2 Board Chairs ……………………………………………………… 3 CRA & MSTU Board Members…………………………………… 4 CRA & MSTU Boundary Maps…………………………………… 5 What is a CRA ……………………………………………………… 6 What is a MSTU …………………………………………………… 7 CRA Projects ……………………………………………………… 8-10 MSTU Projects……………………………………………………… 12 Joint CRA & MSTU Projects……………………………………… 12-13 Community Events………………………………………………… 14-15 Goals ………………………………………………………………… 16 Public Meetings …………………………………………………… 17 Financial Reporting ……………………………………………… 18 Transportation ◦Immokalee Airport is a public-use airport located 1 mile (1.6 km) northeast of the central business district. ◦Collier Area Transit provides the local bus service and paratransit. ◦Immokalee used to be served by the Seaboard Coast Line Railroad. The rail line abandoned to the mainline at Palmdale in the 1980s. This left Immokalee without rail service. ◦The main road through Immokalee is State Road 29. Other important county roads through the region are CR 29A (New Market Road) and CR 846. Community and Education ◦Immokalee is the center of the region's agriculture industry and home to many immigrant and migrant families who work the vast fields which produce a large amount of the United States' fresh produce. ◦Immokalee's public schools are operated by the District School Board of Collier County. ◦Elementary schools in Immokalee include Eden Park, Highlands, Lake Trafford, Village Oaks, RCMA Charter School and Pinecrest Elementary School. All residents are zoned to Immokalee Middle School and Immokalee High School. Pace Center Girls and the Immokalee Technical Center are also in the Immokalee area. Landmarks and Institutions ◦The federally recognized Seminole Tribe of Florida has one of its six reservations here, in Immokalee, on which it operates one of its gaming casinos called the Seminole Casino Hotel of Immokalee. This year Gulfshore Business Magazine listed them on the Southwest Florida Top Attractions. With the most annual attendance of 2.04 Million visitors in 2016. ◦Other landmark areas include the Immokalee Pioneer Museum at Roberts Ranch, Pepper Ranch Preserve, Immokalee Regional Raceway and Airboats & Alligator’s Ecotourism. History ◦Immokalee is an unincorporated area in Collier County. ◦Originally known as Gopher Ridge by the Seminole and Miccosukee Indians. Immokalee means "My Home" in Mikasuki language. ◦The Immokalee area is heavily agricultural. It is one of the major centers of tomato growing in the United States. Demographics – 2010 Census ◦Population was 24,154. ◦Median age was 25 years. ◦Median income for a household in the CDP (census designated place) was $24,315, and the median income for a family was $22,628. 1 Terry Rosalez Administrative Assistant An Immokalee native, born and raised in Immokalee. She is excited about this new endeavor with the Immokalee CRA. Having lived here most of her life, she sees a lot of changes and wants to be able to help the community in any way she can. She has worked in various job positions in Immokalee. She worked with the Collier County School District for 10 ten years as a Paraprofessional and with the Southwest Florida Development Board, Inc. (Miracle Program) as a Site Coordinator for the last 4 years. Ms. Rosalez invites you to contact her at any time with questions or for information about the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency at TerryRosalez@colliergov.net. James Sainvilus Project Manager Is a 1997 graduate of Immokalee High School and a former science teacher at Immokalee Middle School. He bring to his new responsibilities seven years as project manager for the Collier County Public Utilities Planning and Project Management Department. A graduate of Alabama A&M University, BS in Electrical Engineering and Minor in Mathematics. Sainvilus said he’s happy to be in a position to make improvements to the community he loves. Born in Haiti, Sainvilus came to the U.S. with his family when he was 16 years old. James welcomes you to email him at JamesSainvilus@colliergov.net. Christie A. Betancourt Interim Operations Manager Accepted the position of Interim Operations for the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) in November 2015. She has worked for the CRA as the Administrative Assistant since 2008 transferring from Collier County Parks and Recreation, Immokalee Branch, where she was a Program Leader for eight years. Since coming on board with the Immokalee CRA Ms. Betancourt has contributed significantly to the development of the established CRA. In addition to her regular office duties at the CRA, Ms. Betancourt assists local Immokalee community members with logistical issues pertaining to grant programs and other governmental communication efforts. Ms. Betancourt is an Immokalee, Florida native Floridian. Ms. Betancourt invites you to contact her at any time at ChristieBetancourt@colliergov.net. Michelle Edwards-Arnold Division Director, Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement Michelle Arnold has been employed with Collier County since 1989. She started with the County as a Planner in the Comprehensive Planning Department with responsibilities over the Future Land Use Element for the County. She was also a manager in the County’s Housing Department administering various grant programs before becoming an Assistant to the County Manager. After working in the County Manager’s office Mrs. Arnold was promoted to Director of Code Enforcement and ran a successful Department for 10 years. Currently as the Division Director of Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement (PTNE) , Michelle is responsible for operating the Transit System, managing 14 Municipal Service Taxing Units (MSTU) with projects consisting of roadway improvement to electric utility burial. Recently, Mrs. Arnold’s duties was expanded to include Director of the County’s Community Redevelopment Areas (Immokalee and Bayshore). 2 Dr. Frank Nappo of Naples has a longstanding involvement in volunteering and public service. He has served as a board member of the Naples Art Association at Von Liebig Art Center and was President of the association’s board 2007-2011. He has served as President of Drug Free Collier 2012-2016 and has been a board member for the past eight years. He currently is the President of Immokalee Housing and Family Services 2012-2016 serving on the board since 2008. He was appointed to serve on the Governor’s Commission on Community Service, Volunteer Florida 2011-2015. He was appointed to the Volunteer Florida Foundation 2013-2016. In 2014 he was appointed to the Immokalee CRA and became Chair in 2016. He is a Board Member and Secretary of Residential Options of Florida and a Board Member of 1 By 1 Leadership Immokalee. Dr. Nappo is retired from a distinguished career in education including his role as Dean of Liberal Arts and Associate Professor at Burlington County College. Burlington County College is now known as Rowan College of Burlington. He earned his Ed. D. at Rutgers University and both his B.A. and M.A. degrees at New Jersey City University. Her hometown was Tarboro, North Carolina. She is of Native American/White & African America descent. She left when she was 18 years to attend school at A&T State University where she received her BS degree. She was the 1st African American accepted for a Dietetic Internship @ Duke University & MS in Public Health Nutrition from University of Wisconsin. She is a member of Roman Catholic Faith, Future Homemakers of America, American Dietetic Association, The Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority (AKA) & Co-Host of Call Radio 90.5 Talk Show. She has been married for 43 years to Fred N. Thomas Jr., who was Public Housing Administrator (retired from the Collier County Housing Authority) two children (Dr. Fred N. Thomas III -Internal Medicine) & (Ms. Stephanie Williams-Va. High School Principal) and several Grandchildren & God Children. 3 Dr. Frank Nappo Immokalee CRA Chair President, Immokalee Housing and Family Services Board Member Residential Options of Florida Board Member 1By 1 Leadership Board Member Drug Free Collier Cherryle Patricia Thomas, Immokalee MSTU Chair Chair of the Christmas Around the World Committee Event Coordinator for the Immokalee Chamber of Commerce Mrs. Cherryle Thomas has been a resident of Immokalee for over 26 years. She came to Immokalee in 1985. Since her arrival she has been involved in volunteer and public service work. She was the principal founder of "Christmas around the World Parade & Snow Gala" in 1991. She has served as the chair for the committee for 25 years. She has also served on the MSTU board for 24 years and has been the Chair since 2005. She has been apart of the Immokalee Chamber of Commerce since 1990. She has contributed to every parade held since her arrival to Immokalee. Her lifelong mission is to make a difference in her community. Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board: Dr. Frank Nappo, Chair Estil Null, Vice Chair Michael Facundo Ski Olesky Cynthia Lozano Andrea Halman Martha Williams/Yvar Pierre Julio Estremera/Paul Anderson Jr. Joseph Mucha Jim Wall Board of County Commissioners: Commissioner Donna Fiala, District 1 CRA Board Chair Andy Solis,Esq., District 2 Burt L. Saunders, District 3 Penny Taylor, District 4 Commissioner Bill McDaniel, District 5 Immokalee Lighting and Beautification MSTU: Cherryle Thomas, Chair Bill Deyo, Vice Chair Norma Garcia Andrea Halman Lucy Ortiz/Paul Anderson Jr. 4 MSTU Urban Boundary 5 CRA Redevelopment Area Boundary The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) was established in March of 2000 to alleviate slum and blight in two separate Redevelopment Areas within Collier County: The Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area and the Immokalee Redevelopment Area. Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) refers to a public entity created by Collier County to implement the community redevelopment activities outlined under Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The CRA adopted the Immokalee Master Plan, which includes the all of the Immokalee Urban Designated Area. Property values in the Community Redevelopment Area are capped or frozen at the assessed value for a particular base year. Thereafter, any tax revenues due to increases in value in excess of the base are dedicated to the redevelopment area. The generated revenue is known as TIF. Tax increment financing is used in the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area to leverage its redevelopment efforts. 6 A Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) is a funding mechanism for community members to create, through approval of the Board of County Commissioners, a special taxing district to make improvements to their neighborhood and/or community area. Providing additional services based on community desires. Our daily, routine services of the Immokalee Beautification MSTU consist of managing the maintenance of all area public areas along Main Street (SR 29) and 1st Street (CR 846) within the limits of the Immokalee Urban Area. Our responsibility includes the selection, coordination and management of Collier County approved contractors assigned to various maintenance and repair services such as lawn mowing, sidewalk and gutter cleaning, landscape maintenance, irrigation system management, and street lighting (Immokalee’s blue street lights). In addition, the MSTU is here to serve you, the public, providing assistance and coordination for communication with various governmental agencies. Immokalee Lighting and Beautification The five member committee was created on October 22, 1985, amended on October 22, 2002 to assist the Board of County Commissioners in the business affairs of the Immokalee Beautification Taxing District, and prepare and recommend an itemized budget to carry out the business of the district for each fiscal year and recently October 2011 to designate the CRA as administer and manager of the Immokalee MSTU. Membership represents the population of the area within the Immokalee Beautification District. Four members shall be permanent residents within the MSTU and one member may be an owner of residential or commercial property within the MSTU or may be an individual, an officer of a corporation, or a partner of a partnership. Terms are 4 years. How funding is created? Through a millage rate set by the MSTU’s enabling Ordinance. All capital projects, as well as the maintenance and other operating projects, are managed by Project Manager James Sainvilus of the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency – Immokalee. 7 Commercial Façade Improvement Grant: The purpose of the Facade Improvement Grant Program is to increase commercial occupancy rates and property values within the CRA while revitalizing the overall appearance of the Immokalee Urban Designated Area. Eligible applicants may receive grant funding up to a maximum of $20,000 as reimbursement, using a one-half (½)-to-1 match with equal applicant funding for facade improvements to commercial structures. 8 On April 26, 2016 the Collier County Board of County Commissioners acting in its capacity as the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) approved the application and recipient agreement for the Immokalee CRA Commercial Facade Improvement Grant Program for reimbursement of $20,000 for facade improvements to Lozano’s Restaurant located at 405 New Market Road, Immokalee, Florida, which is located within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area. Construction it set to be completed in early 2017. Immokalee Area Received (RAO) Rural Area of Opportunity Designation: The benefits of being a designated RAO is that communities are given extra points on grants, they are eligible to receive waivers or reduction of match, they are priority assignments for REDI as well as to allow the Governor, acting through REDI, to waive criteria, requirements, or similar provisions of any economic development incentive. Incentives include, but are not limited to, the Qualified Target Industry Tax Refund Program, Quick Response Training Program, and Quick Response Training Program for participants in the welfare transition program, transportation projects, Brownfield redevelopment bonus refund, and the rural job tax credit program. 9 Immokalee Received Promise Zone Designation: The Southwest Florida Promise Zone (SFPZ) was one of two rural areas designated by President Obama on June 6, 2016. The SFPZ, which is the only Promise Zone in Florida, covers all of Glades and Hendry Counties as well as the Immokalee portion of Collier County. The Promise Zone is a partnership led by the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council with goals of creating jobs, enhancing economic activity, improving educational opportunities, reducing crime and improving community infrastructure. Promise Zone Benefits: The Promise Zone designation partners the Federal government with local leaders who are addressing multiple community revitalization challenges in a collaborative way. Promise Zone Designees will receive: •Preferences for certain competitive federal grant programs and technical assistance from participating federal agencies; •A federal liaison assigned to help designees navigate federal programs; •An opportunity to engage AmeriCorps VISTA members in the Promise Zone’s work; and, •Promise Zone tax Incentives, if enacted by Congress. Altogether, this will last for a term of 10 years. During this term, the specific benefits made available to Promise Zones will vary from year to year, and sometimes more often than annually, due to changes in package of assistance will accelerate local efforts. The Promise Zone designation the agency policies and changes in appropriations and authorizations for relevant programs. 10 Immokalee amended the Land Development Code Section 2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts: Main Street Overlay Subdistrict (MSOSD) The CRA advisory board unanimously voted on November 18, 2015 to seek relief from the prohibitive uses through the conditional use process rather than alter the existing MSOSD boundary. Relief through a conditional use would be provided for properties with frontage on N. First St., S. First St., and N. Ninth St. (Shaded Yellow areas on Figure 1). The conditional uses would not apply to properties with frontage on Main St. located in between First St. and Ninth St. The principle reason for this exception is to preserve these streets as a pedestrian oriented district and to support public safety. The approved amendment amends the conditional and prohibited uses within the Immokalee MSOSD. First, to apply the current prohibited commercial uses identified in the MSOSD to only properties with frontage on Main St. in between First St. and Ninth St. (Light Blue - Dotted area on Figure 1). Secondly, to allow the current prohibited uses identified in the MSOSD to become conditional uses for properties with frontage on N. First St., South First St., and N. Ninth St. (Yellow-Highlighted areas on Figure 1). The Immokalee MSOSD was originally codified through the adoption of Ordinance No. 2000-08. The purpose and intent of the overlay designation was to “encourage development and redevelopment by enhancing and beautifying the downtown Main Street area through flexible design and development standards” (Ordinance No. 2000-08, Section 2.2.28.1). Since August of 2015, various buyers have sought to purchase properties for uses, such as a car dealership, gas station/convenience store, and a motel in areas where these uses are prohibited. Therefore, they did not enter into purchase agreements due to land use limitations. The CRA advisory board supported providing a conditional use process because each application for a conditional use would be reviewed, vetted on a case-by-case basis, and assessed for compatibility with the surrounding area. In addition, the board would be able to provide public comments on conceptual site plans and development standards, such as lighting, noise, landscape buffers, parking, etc., during a public hearing process. The advisory board relayed that the LDC amendment request will broaden the list of uses available in the MSOSD and has the potential to bolster economic development and foster job creation by increased commercial occupancy rates. 11 Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan: In 2004, due to historical concerns regarding storm water contaminants and flooding, the Big Cypress Basin performed a comprehensive drainage study of Immokalee, known as the Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan that was completed by HM Lochener, Inc in 2006. Over the past eight years, the Immokalee CRA has continued it’s efforts in implementing the projects, or problem areas, identified in the Plan. The South Florida Water Management District has been a huge supporter of the CRA’s mission to improve the water quality and flow rates of the storm waters throughout Immokalee. The District contributed $200,000 to the design of the Immokalee Drive Drainage Improvement project and is a potential partner for future projects. The Collier County Growth Management Division, Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, US Department of Housing & Urban Development and the Collier County Community & Human Services Department have also been huge contributors by assisting the CRA in bringing this Plan to fruition. In 2014, the Immokalee CRA awarded two construction contracts related to the further implementation of the Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan construction began on March 2015 and was completed on August 2015. Part of the deliverables of CDM Smith, Inc. was to update the Immokalee Stormwater Master Plan. The draft plan is currently being revised by the Collier County’s Growth Management Division staff. FDOT Project coordinating with the Immokalee CRA and MSTU - Pedestrian Safety Improvements on SR 29 (Main Street) from N 9 th Street to N 1st Street. FDOT will be constructing new signals at 3rd St. and 7th St., and consolidating the midblock crossings and signage to reflect the new changes in their standards. There are also some ADA upgrades that they will be doing as well as new lighting throughout the corridor. The project is currently in design phase. Expected Construction in 2019. 12 Our daily, routine services of the Immokalee Beautification MSTU consist of managing the maintenance of all public areas along Main Street (SR 29) and 1st Street (CR 846) within the limits of the Immokalee Urban Area. A&M Property Maintenance, a local Immokalee vendor, has been providing great service by performing various maintenance and repair services, such as lawn mowing, sidewalk and gutter cleaning, landscape maintenance, irrigation system management, and installing banners and holiday decorations. Changes to Project: No longer pursuing pedestrian fencing Reduced impact to median landscaping Enhance existing crossing at N. 5th St. to include overhead RRFB Reduced signage at crossings (36 down to 20) Install two additional crosswalks Scope of Project: Traffic signals at N 3rd Street and N 7th Street Maintain existing midblock crosswalks Install LED highway lighting through the corridor ADA, signing, and pavement marking enhancements Reducing pedestrian crossing distance at side streets 13 Immokalee Sidewalk Improvement Project: Collier County’s Community and Human Services Division awarded the CRA with a Community Development Block Grant in the amount of $475,000. The MSTU hired Agnoli, Barber, & Brudgage Inc. to design the construction of sidewalks along both sides of West Eustis Avenue from South 9th St to South 5th Street, along the east side of South 5th Street from Carver Street to the Bethune School’s existing concrete sidewalk, and along the west side of South 9th Street from West Eustis Avenue to Colorado Avenue. The construction project is slated to be finished by September 2017. The Lipman Backpack Giveaway Boys & Girls Club Grand Opening Collier Area Transit Public Meeting Immokalee Chamber of Commerce Meetings Immokalee Soccer Pit Cobra Proclamation Immokalee Harvest Festival Christmas Around the World Gala & Parade Mackensie Alexander Day Juanita’s Grand Opening Avow Butterfly Event Big Bus Event Farm City BBQ Event Sunflower Event Earth Day Ciclovia Events Interagency Rotary Club 14 The CRA hosted the Annual Tree Lighting with the help of the MSTU, the Seminole Casino, Collier County Parks & Recreation, the Immokalee Chamber of Commerce, the Sheriffs Department and the Immokalee Fire Department. Special thanks to all the performers. We look forward to making the event better next year. 15 2016 CRA Advisory Board Goals: Economic Development, business Retention & Expansion Marketing & Branding Infrastructure Transportation Identify and prioritize drainage and storm water improvements to reduce flooding and promote development Land use Planning 16 2016 MSTU Committee Advisory Board Goals: Lighting Pedestrians Pathways/Sidewalks/Streetscape Drainage & Stormwater Improvements Beautification & Landscape Beautification Water Quality Road Improvements Other Improvements 17 Meeting Date Meeting Location Attendees January 20, 2016 Joint CRA& MSTU Meeting Anne Oleksy Park @ Immokalee Pier 31 February 17, 2016 Joint CRA & MSTU Meeting Immokalee Pioneer Museum @ Roberts Ranch 26 March 16, 2016 Joint CRA & MSTU Meeting Pepper Ranch 34 April 20, 2016 Joint CRA & MSTU Meeting Immokalee Library 42 May 18, 2016 Joint CRA & MSTU Meeting Seminole Casino Hotel Immokalee – Event Center 35 June 15, 2016 CRA Meeting Immokalee Airport – Salazar Machine & Steel 48 June 22, 2016 MSTU Meeting Careersource SWFL 11 July 2016 No CRA or MSTU Meeting 0 August 24, 2016 Joint CRA & MSTU Meeting Careersource SWFL 39 September 21, 2016 Joint CRA & MSTU Meeting Careersource SWFL 37 October 12, 2016 MSTU Meeting Careersource SWFL 7 October 19, 2016 CRA Meeting Immokalee Community Park 24 November 10, 2016 MSTU Meeting Careersource SWFL 9 November16, 2016 CRA Meeting Careersource SWFL 22 December 20, 2016 MSTU Meeting Careersource SWFL 13 December 21, 2016 CRA Meeting Immokalee Airport Hangar 30 Public meetings for the Immokalee CRA are held the third Wednesday of every month. Public meetings for the Immokalee MSTU are held the fourth Wednesday of every month. All meetings are held at 750 South 5th Street, Immokalee, FL., 34142 at 8:30 AM unless otherwise noticed. Draft Financial Reporting 18 In accordance with s.163.356 (3) Fla., Stat., the annual report for the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) has been filed with Collier County. This report includes information on activities for fiscal year 2016. Complete financial statements are contained in the 2016 Collier County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). 19 20 21 Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency - Immokalee CareerSource Southwest Florida 750 South Fifth Street, Immokalee, FL 34142 www.ImmokaleeToday.com 239-867-0025