The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 06/27/2017 Item #11D06/27/2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to (1) accept the Technical Engineering Feasibility Report prepared by Stantec and the Financial Feasibility Report prepared by the Public Resources Management Group (PRMG) as they relate to the acquisition of the Golden Gate System from the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA); (2) authorize the County Manager or his designee to initiate final due diligence process and negotiation of the terms of acquisition of the FGUA Golden Gate Utility pursuant to the interlocal agreement, and (3) authorize the Chair to execute a Resolution notifying the FGUA of the District’s intent to pursue the process toward acquisition of the Golden Gate Utility. OBJECTIVE: To provide the Board of County Commissioners with the feasibility assessments and recommendation to initiate the process for acquisition of the Golden Gate System pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement to provide water and wastewater services under the operation of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (the District). CONSIDERATIONS: On March 14, 2017, Agenda item 10A, staff was directed to move forward with feasibility assessments as it pertains to acquisition of all the assets of the Golden Gate System in accordance with the Interlocal Agreement between FGUA and the District dated March 1, 1999. The Golden Gate System currently serves approximately 3,700 water customers and 2,300 wastewater customers in Golden Gate City. In response to the March agenda item, staff engaged Stantec, under Collier County Contract 13-6164-PU, to evaluate the technical feasibility associated with Collier County acquiring the FGUA assets. The Technical Feasibility Report is attached as Exhibit 1. Pursuant to Agreement #14-6353 for Financial Consulting Services, staff engaged PRMG with a financial feasibility analysis. The Financial Feasibility Report is attached as Exhibit 2. Staff conducted an infrastructure security assessment review of the FGUA facilities on May 10, 2017 as part of the Homeland Security requirements. The assessment included, but was not limited to, Facility Function and Purpose, Security Force, Security Management, Security Activity Background and Physical Security. The Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report is attached as Exhibit 3. The Integrated Water Management Strategy was presented at the Board workshop on November 3, 2015. The Department Heads from the Public Utilities Department and the Growth Management Department presented their joint Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles to the Board regarding long term water resource management strategies. The Board formally adopted the guiding principles on December 8, 2015, Agenda Item 16C4, one of which included expansion of the CCWSD service area. The Integrated Water Management Strategy is attached as Exhibit 4, the Special Act is attached as Exhibit 5 and the Interlocal Agreement is attached as Exhibit 6. The Collier County regional plants are positioned to serve the growing customer base district -wide consistent with the Board approved Integrated Sustainable Water Resources Strategy (ISWRS) aligned with CCWSD Special Act in all the quadrants of Golden Gate. 1. Public Health of approximately 10,000+ customers will need to be addressed by providing safe drinking water, not wells surrounded by septic systems in close-dense proximity (currently only approximately one quadrant of the four in the FGUA service area has access to a treated potable water supply). 2. Public Safety for approximately 24,000 residents (2010 Census) by providing Fire Hydrants 11.D Packet Pg. 396 06/27/2017 throughout the Golden Gate area. 3. Environmental Health to be addressed after Public Health and Safety tasks are complete, starting with providing wastewater service to lots next to the Golden Gate Canal during the next 10 -20 years. Upon review of the consultants’ feasibility reports, it is staff’s recommendation to proceed with the integration. A Resolution of the Board is attached as Exhibit 7. FISCAL IMPACT: If the Board agrees with staff’s recommendation to proceed with notification to the FGUA board of the County’s intent to conduct final due diligence and negotiate terms for the integration of the Golden Gate System into the District, the primary fiscal impacts include the following: Estimated incremental annual revenues of $7.8 million at current FGUA user rates for the current user base would be reduced by approximately $2.1 million at the current District rates. The utility bill for a customer served by the Golden Gate System with consumption of 5,000 gallons monthly would see a decrease in their bill of $39.27, or 30.2 percent under current District rates. Operating expenses are currently estimated to remain essentially the same, as some current management fees would be eliminated, offset by additional PILT payments on incremental revenues. Upon assumption of the existing Golden Gate System debt, the District would have additional debt service of $2.8 million on existing FGUA bonds and SRF loans of $38.6 million. Impact to measures used by bond rating agencies are as follows: o Debt per customer for the District is currently $1,333, while that for the GGU is $6,500. Consolidated District debt per customer would increase to $1,569. o The District’s All-In Debt Coverage ratio would decrease from 259 percent to 237 percent after integration, still above Fitch’s minimum of 150 percent; however, the financial consultant’s opinion is there would be no unfavorable impact to the existing bond ratings. LEGAL CONSIDERATION: This item is approved as to form and legality, and requires majority vote for Board approval. -SRT GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Acquisition of the Golden Gate System would meet current Growth Management Plan standards to ensure adequacy of viable public utilities. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners, Ex-officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (1) accept the Technical and Financial Preliminary Feasibility Reports by Consultants; (2) authorize the County Manager or his designee to initiate the process toward acquisition of the Golden Gate Utility pursuant to the interlocal agreement, including final due diligence and negotiation of acquisition terms; (3) authorize the Chair to execute a Resolution to be sent to the FGUA Board notifying the FGUA of the County’s intent to initiate final due diligence and negotiate terms of transfer of the Golden Gate System to the District; (4) authorize the County Attorney to retain Special Legal Counsel as needed; and (5) authorize the County Manager or his designee to retain consultants as needed. Prepared by: Joe Bellone, Director Financial Operations Support, Public Utilities Heather Bustos, Operations Analyst, Public Utilities 11.D Packet Pg. 397 06/27/2017 ATTACHMENT(S) 1. [Linked]Exhibit 1 - FGUA Technical Feasibility Study 20170612 - FINAL (PDF) 2. Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (PDF) 3. Exhibit 3.1 - GG Waste Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (PDF) 4. Exhibit 3.2 - GG Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (PDF) 5. Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (PDF) 6. Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (PDF) 7. [Linked] Exhibit 6 - Golden Gate Interlocal Compensation Agreement (PDF) 8. Exhibit 7 - Collier County Resolution Notifying FGUA of Initiation of Process for Tr... (PDF) 11.D Packet Pg. 398 06/27/2017 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 11.D Doc ID: 3401 Item Summary: Recommendation to (1) accept the Technical Engineering Feasibility Report prepared by Stantec and the Financial Feasibility Report prepared by the Public Resources Management Group (PRMG), as they relate to the acquisition of the Golden Gate System from the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA); (2) authorize the County Manager or his designee to initiate final due diligence process and negotiation of the terms of acquisition of the FGUA Golden Gate Utility pursuant to the interlocal agreement, and (3) authorize the Chair to execute a Resolution notifying the FGUA of the District’s intent to pursue the process toward acquisition of the Golden Gate Utility. (George Yilmaz, Public Utilities Department Head) Meeting Date: 06/27/2017 Prepared by: Title: – Public Utilities Department Name: Heather Bustos 06/20/2017 12:49 PM Submitted by: Title: Department Head - Public Utilities – Public Utilities Department Name: George Yilmaz 06/20/2017 12:49 PM Approved By: Review: Public Utilities Operations Support Joseph Bellone Additional Reviewer Completed 06/20/2017 2:30 PM Public Utilities Department Heather Bustos Level 1 Division Reviewer Completed 06/20/2017 4:06 PM Public Utilities Department George Yilmaz Level 2 Division Administrator Review Completed 06/20/2017 7:56 PM County Attorney's Office Scott Teach Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 06/21/2017 12:20 PM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 06/21/2017 1:03 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 06/21/2017 1:19 PM Budget and Management Office Ed Finn Additional Reviewer Completed 06/21/2017 2:40 PM Office of Management and Budget Susan Usher Additional Reviewer Completed 06/21/2017 3:29 PM County Manager's Office Leo E. Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 06/21/2017 4:05 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 06/27/2017 9:00 AM 11.D Packet Pg. 399 PUBLIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. Utility, Rate, Financial, and Management Consultants 341 N. Maitland Avenue, Suite 300, Maitland, FL 32751 Telephone (407) 628-2600 • Fax (407) 628-2610 E-mail prmg@prmginc.com Technical Memorandum TO: Dr. G. George Yilmaz, Ph.D., P.E., P.H. Utilities Administrator Mr. Joseph Bellone Director, Financial Operations Support Division Collier County Public Utilities FROM: Robert J. Ori President Bryan A. Mantz, CMC, CGFM Managing Consultant Public Resources Management Group, Inc. DATE: June 9, 2017 SUBJECT: Preliminary Analysis – Financial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition Public Resources Management Group, Inc. ("PRMG") has completed our preliminary financial feasibility analysis of the estimated effects of the potential acquisition and consolidation of the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (the "FGUA") Golden Gate Water and Wastewater Utility System (the "Golden Gate System") with the Collier County Water-Sewer District (the "CCWSD") utility system. The primary purpose of this preliminary analysis was to identify the immediate potential financial effects to the individual systems and customers associated with ownership of the Golden Gate System by Collier County (the "County"). In accordance with the "Interlocal Agreement Relating to the Acquisition of the Golden Gate System" between the FGUA and the CCWSD dated March 1, 1999 (the "Acquisition Agreement"), the CCWSD may acquire the Golden Gate System for a purchase price equal to the amount required to repay the Golden Gate System's outstanding bonds and any additional obligations of the FGUA. The CCWSD must also pay all verifiable expenses associated with the transfer of the Golden Gate System by the FGUA to the CCWSD. The advantages and disadvantages for consolidation of the two (2) utility systems include the following: (Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank) 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 2 of 32 Benefits of Golden Gate System Acquisition by County 1. The existing Golden Gate System monthly user rates are significantly higher than those of the CCWSD. If the County were to acquire the Golden Gate System and charge the CCWSD rates to the Golden Gate System customers, the approximately 3,681 water accounts and 2,303 wastewater accounts (based on a detailed review of customer billing records as provided by the FGUA) currently served by the Golden Gate System could recognize overall savings of about 25% on their monthly water and wastewater bills – assuming the same monthly usage – as shown in the following table: Projected Combined Water and Wastewater User Rate Revenues Under Existing FGUA-Golden Gate System Rates and CCWSD Rates – Fiscal Year 2017 No Water Conservation [2] With Water Conservation [3] Revenue Revenue Revenue Under Under Under Existing Existing Existing FGUA CCWSD Difference CCWSD Difference Customer Class Rates [1] Rates Amount Percent Rates Amount Percent Individually-Metered Residential $4,008,555 $2,903,170 ($1,105,384) (28%) $2,903,170 ($1,105,385) (28%) Master-Metered Residential 2,046,835 1,652,342 (394,493) (19%) 1,524,826 (522,009) (26%) Commercial 1,523,046 1,121,706 (401,341) (26%) 1,089,406 (433,640) (28%) Total $7,578,436 $5,677,218 ($1,901,218) (25%) $5,517,402 ($2,061,034 (27%) __________ [1] Amounts derived from Table 1 at the end of this technical memorandum. [2] Amounts derived from Table 2 at the end of this technical memorandum. Assumes same monthly usage (no price elasticity or water conservation adjustments). [3] Amounts derived from Table 2 at the end of this technical memorandum. Assumes that master-metered residential and commercial customer usage within the highest water usage pricing block of the CCWSD water rate structure – currently billed to CCWSD customers at $11.62 per 1,000 gallons – would decrease after acquisition. Under the existing FGUA rates, all water usage for the master-metered residential and commercial customers is currently being billed at $6.49 per 1,000 gallons. The revenue totals shown in the above table were derived in Tables 1 and 2 at the end of this technical memorandum. For the purposes of reviewing the overall financial picture, PRMG has assumed that there would be some water conservation by the Golden Gate System master- metered and commercial customers for the usage within the highest water usage pricing block of the CCWSD water rate structure that is currently billed to CCWSD customers at $11.62 per 1,000 gallons. Under the existing FGUA rates, all water usage for the master-metered residential and commercial customers is currently being billed at $6.49 per 1,000 gallons. As shown in the above table, the total estimated Golden Gate System revenue under CCWSD rates with the assumed price elasticity / water conservation adjustments is $5,517,402, an overall estimated rate revenue decrease of $2,061,034 or 27%. Table 3 at the end of this technical memorandum contains a bill comparison for 5/8-inch meter residential customers, which comprise about 89% of the Golden Gate water system customer base and about 87% of the wastewater system customer base, under the Fiscal Year 2017 Golden Gate System rates and the CCWSD rates. 2. The recognition of operational synergies and cost savings anticipated to be experienced through the consolidation of duplicative costs currently existing with the operation of the individual systems for the long-term benefit of the Golden Gate System customers. The County's initial plan based on the preliminary findings of the technical feasibility analysis would be to interconnect the Golden Gate water system with the CCWSD water system shortly after acquisition, with a goal of providing safe drinking water and adequate fire protection (fire hydrants) throughout the service area. Long-term plans for the Golden Gate wastewater system 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 3 of 32 are being evaluated. Reference is made to the "Technical Feasibility Study for Acquisition of FGUA Water and Wastewater Assets in Golden Gate" (the "Technical Feasibility Study") dated June 9, 2017 as prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. for a description of Golden Gate System existing condition and planning considerations for the system. 3. The Golden Gate System is surrounded on all sides by the CCWSD, and the County could ensure that customers currently served by the Golden Gate System would receive the same levels of service enjoyed by existing CCWSD customers. 4. A significant portion of the Golden Gate System service area remains undeveloped (vacant property) or unserved (on-site well and septic tanks as opposed to receiving regional utility service). The County could have a better opportunity to develop a plan to expand service to these residents and mitigate the potential environmental impacts associated with aging septic systems. The CCWSD would collect impact fees from any new connections as well as monthly user rate revenues, and the CCWSD could recover its total costs over a larger customer base for the benefit of all CCWSD customers. 5. The County's General Fund could benefit from the increase in the Payment-In-Lieu-of-Taxes (PILT) from the CCWSD that is currently 5.25% of operating revenues and is estimated to be about $300,000 assuming that the Golden Gate System customers would pay the CCWSD rates after acquisition. The increase in the PILT would offset the loss of the approximately $150,000 in annual regulatory fees (2% of gross revenues) that the Golden Gate System currently pays to the County (as discussed later in this memorandum). It should be noted that the PILT is treated as an operating expense of the CCWSD and, as such, affects the CCWSD's debt service coverage. 6. Any financing required to meet increasing regulations within the Golden Gate System service area could possibly be secured at lower interest rates given the CCWSD's strong (AAA) credit rating. Disadvantages of Golden Gate System Acquisition by County 1. The acquisition price for the Golden Gate System pursuant to the agreement between the FGUA and the County is the amount required to repay the Golden Gate System's outstanding debt and any additional obligations of the FGUA with respect to the System. As of September 30, 2016, the Golden Gate System had $39,871,983 of debt outstanding, and annual debt service payments of about $2,805,000. The Golden Gate System is currently highly-leveraged, and this is one reason why the Golden Gate System rates are higher than the CCWSD's. While the outstanding debt per account for the CCWSD is about $1,333, the debt per account for the Golden Gate System is around $6,500. Whereas the debt outstanding to net plant ratio for the CCWSD is approximately 18%, this ratio for the Golden Gate System is about 139% (not recognizing goodwill or "excess of cost over fair value of acquired assets, net"; if goodwill were added to the net plant, the ratio for the Golden Gate System would be about 116%). (It should be noted that the current rates for the Golden Gate System support the system's debt service payments and that the system has never been in default of the payment of its annual debt service requirements.) Based on the financial health (AAA-rated) and relative size of the CCWSD compared with the Golden Gate System, PRMG considers that the County could take over the Golden Gate System's debt while still maintaining favorable financial metrics (e.g., 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 4 of 32 debt service coverage). However, the CCWSD's debt service coverage ratio would still decrease and the additional debt could possibly have a long-term effect on the CCWSD's monthly user rates. The estimated effect on coverage and on the amount available for other System purposes after payment of the debt service is shown in the following table: Estimated Effect on Debt Service Coverage – Fiscal Year 2017 CCWSD Operating Results Prior to CCWSD Operating FGUA-Golden Gate Results After Description Acquisition Acquisition [1] Net Revenues [2] $46,465,837 $49,114,005 Total Debt Service (Senior and Subordinate) [3] 17,933,106 20,738,269 All-In Debt Service Coverage 259% 237% Amount Available for Other System Purposes After Payment of Debt Service [4] $28,532,731 $28,375,736 __________ [1] Assumes that customers in the Golden Gate system would be charged the CCWSD rates. [2] The Net Revenues after acquisition reflect the estimated increase in the PILT (transfer to the County's General Fund) that is an operating expense of the CCWSD. [3] The total debt service for the CCWSD for the Fiscal Year 2017 was adjusted to reflect a full year of payments on the Water and Sewer Refunding Revenue Note (Subordinate), Series 2016 (the "Series 2016 Revenue Note") that was issued during the Fiscal Year 2017 (in December 2016). The Series 2016 Revenue Note refunded all of the CCWSD's then-outstanding State Revolving Fund (SRF) loans. [4] Amounts available to address the pay-as-you-go capital needs of the CCWSD. 2. The FGUA has identified approximately $9.1 million in capital improvements to be completed for the Golden Gate System during the Fiscal Years 2017 through 2021 as shown in Table 4 at the end of this technical memorandum. As of September 30, 2016, the Golden Gate System had approximately $11.7 million in fund balances available to address these capital needs and provide adequate working capital as shown in the following table: Estimated Golden Gate System Fund Balances as of September 30, 2016 Description Amount Fund Balances Available for Capital Needs: Operating Reserves [1] $7,697,357 Renewal and Replacement Fund 1,815,482 Rate Stabilization Account 1,151,910 Water Connection Fee Fund [2] 674,442 Wastewater Connection Fee Fund [2] 31,970 Construction Fund from Outstanding Bond Issues [3] 344,387 Total Fund Balances Available for Capital Needs $11,715,548 Other Fund Balances: Debt Service Sinking Fund $704,030 Debt Service Reserve Account 631,782 Customer Deposits 590,373 Total Other Fund Balances $1,926,185 Total Fund Balances $13,641,733 __________ [1] Includes adjustments for accounts receivable and accounts payable. [2] Amounts are restricted to pay for either growth-related projects or growth-related debt service. [3] Amounts are restricted to be used for purposes expressed for each respective bond issue. 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 5 of 32 Any fund balances not used to fund immediate capital needs or to buy down the debt associated with financing the acquisition would transfer to the CCWSD. If the Golden Gate customers were charged CCWSD rates upon acquisition, the Golden Gate System revenues after payment of allocable operating expenses and debt service could support minimum pay-as-you-go capital funding. As such, in lieu of additional rate adjustments for all CCWSD customers or debt financing a portion of the capital needs, other CCWSD financial resources may need to be dedicated to pay for both the identified Golden Gate System capital needs and other capital needs associated with integrating the two utility systems. Reference is made to the Technical Feasibility Study for a discussion of the potential capital costs associated with integrating the two systems. 3. The County's Operation and Regulatory Management Division currently collects regulatory fees equal to two-percent (2%) of gross utility revenues from the Golden Gate System. For the Fiscal Year 2016, this amount totaled over $150,000. If the County acquired the Golden Gate System, the Operations and Regulatory Management Division would lose this annual funding source. However, as discussed previously, the loss of regulatory fees would be offset by the projected increase in the annual PILT payable to the County's General Fund. Additional Due Diligence Activities to Be Performed in Association with Acquisition As of the date of this technical memorandum, the following activities remain to be performed if the County decides to continue pursuing the acquisition: 1. Complete identification of all capital requirements to integrate the Golden Gate System with the CCWSD. 2. Determine in consultation with the County's Financial Advisor whether it would be more financially prudent for the CCWSD to assume the Golden Gate System's existing debt obligations or to refinance such obligations with an additional bond issuance. 3. Finalize transaction costs to transfer management of the Golden Gate System from the FGUA to the County. The FGUA has already indicated that it has a customer service office lease obligation that is estimated to cost $76,332 over the next four years. 4. Work with the County's legal counsel to perform the necessary steps to legally transfer all assets and liabilities for the Golden Gate System from the FGUA to the County. 5. Further identify the costs of operations with U.S. Water Services Corporation, FGUA's contract operator for the Golden Gate System. 6. Verify staffing requirements and whether the CCWSD would need to hire additional personnel upon acquisition. 7. Prepare for the public hearing required in accordance with the Florida Statutes, Section 125.3401. In accordance with the Florida Statutes, no county may purchase or sell a water, sewer, or wastewater reuse utility that provides service to the public until the governing body of the county has held a public hearing on the purchase or sale and made a determination that the purchase or sale is in the public interest. 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 6 of 32 8. If the Board of County Commissioners would like to consider an approach to more gradually transition (e.g., over multiple years) the user rates for the Golden Gate System customers from existing levels to the lower CCWSD rates, work with the County's legal counsel to ensure that the approach utilized is allowed pursuant to the Collier County Water-Sewer District Special Act (which created the CCWSD) and applicable bond covenants. 9. Perform an updated user rate study and impact fee review to integrate the financial plans for the Golden Gate System within the overall operating and capital planning activities of the CCWSD. The updated studies would provide a multi-year forecast of revenues, operating expenses, debt service, and pay-as-you-go capital expenditures. Recommendation PRMG considers that, while there would most likely be some financial impact to existing CCWSD customers as a result of acquiring the Golden Gate System, the overall financial impact is not anticipated to be material over the long-term. The rate relief for Golden Gate System customers, however, could be significant. PRMG recommends that the County weigh the high-level benefits and disadvantages as outlined in this technical memorandum to determine whether the acquisition of the Golden Gate System would be consistent with the County's long-term plans, goals / objectives, and policies. The remainder of this technical memorandum outlines our evaluation approach, primary assumptions, and our overall observations and findings for consideration by the County. Evaluation Approach As previously discussed, the primary focus of this evaluation is to determine the potential financial effects from the immediate consolidation of the Golden Gate System into the CCWSD. To accomplish this, PRMG analyzed the current and estimated near-term financial operations and corresponding capital improvement program (the "CIP") of the Golden Gate and CCWSD systems. Recognizing the Fiscal Year 2017 as the Calculation Period for the consolidation analysis, our approach to the evaluation included the following steps: I. Evaluate the Golden Gate System customer statistics, reconcile the Golden Gate System revenues under existing rates, and develop a customer billing profile under CCWSD rates. II. Estimate the rate revenues for the Golden Gate System service area served by the FGUA for the Calculation Period under existing CCWSD rates to evaluate the estimated effects of a full transition of current Golden Gate System rate levels to the CCWSD rate levels and structures. III. Estimate the net operating expense requirements for the Golden Gate System under County ownership and management. This included a review of the current Golden Gate System Fiscal Year 2017 Budget, recent historical results, and the identification of the estimated expenditures that may be avoided assuming County ownership and regionalization. 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 7 of 32 IV. Identify the estimated financial results for the Computation Period for the CCWSD assuming a consolidated utility which would recognize any adjustments to reflect the addition of the Golden Gate System. V. Identify the outstanding indebtedness of the Golden Gate System and remaining annual debt service payments coming due which will be assumed by the County upon ownership transfer and included as an additional debt component of the CCWSD. VI. Estimate the amount of capital re-investment with County staff to promote the ability of the Golden Gate System to provide service to its customers and estimate if the consolidated system operations would have sufficient cash flow to fund the expenditure requirements. VII. Calculate the effects or changes to compliance with certain key financial performance metrics and review the estimated overall financial creditworthiness of the CCWSD – assuming the consolidation of the Golden Gate System – to determine whether the CCWSD would remain a strong fiscal credit after consolidation. VIII. Identify any risks or issues to the County based the results of the financial evaluation for further consideration. Principal Assumptions Tables 1 through 7 at the end of this technical memorandum present the preliminary Golden Gate System consolidation analysis. The evaluation included the following principal considerations and assumptions: 1. With respect to the Golden Gate System, the Fiscal Year 2017 Budget served as the baseline for the determination of the operating expenses and other required transfers as approved by the FGUA Board of Supervisors (the "FGUA Board"). The Fiscal Year 2017 Budget represents the most recent financial plan as approved by the FGUA Board and was considered reasonable for purposes of this analysis. 2. A calculation of rate revenues assuming Golden Gate System rates and CCWSD System rates was developed; this is shown on Tables 1 and 2 at the end of the technical memorandum. This analysis was based on detailed customer billing information as provided by the FGUA. The rates for retail service and the corresponding rate revenues assuming Golden Gate System rates are currently higher than the rates and corresponding rate revenues assuming the CCWSD rates. Assuming rate consolidation, the Golden Gate System rate revenues were reduced by approximately 27% to recognize the application of the Fiscal Year 2017 CCWSD water and wastewater rates to the Golden Gate System customer base. The Golden Gate System rates have historically been indexed annually based on 75% of the annual increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) pursuant to the provisions contained in the FGUA-approved rate tariff. 3. The Fiscal Year 2017 budgeted Golden Gate System operating expenses were adjusted to recognize certain assumed positive operating synergies anticipated to result from consolidation of such system with the CCWSD. This analysis is shown on Table 5 at the end of this technical memorandum. The principal changes to the Golden Gate System operating expenses assuming consolidated operations included the elimination or reduction of: contract management fees, 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 8 of 32 FGUA Board expenses, contracted supervisory/management personnel expenses associated with the daily operation of the Golden Gate System facilities, and other professional and contractual services. The additional PILT transfer of $299,574 was added as an operating expense. Between the synergy adjustments and the additional PILT transfer, the 2017 budgeted Golden Gate System expenditures were reduced by approximately $512,569. 4. The cost to operate, maintain and provide customer service for the Golden Gate System is based on the contract operator (U.S. Water Services Corporation) budget as contained in the Compensation Agreement between the FGUA and the contract operator. Such amounts were adjusted to: i) remove the gross (profit) margin included in such costs assumed at 15% based on information provided by the FGUA; and ii) remove the customer service costs, since existing CCWSD customer service department would presumably assume such responsibilities with minimal cost increases. 5. Because the analysis is considered as a high level evaluation of the potential consolidation of the Golden Gate System with the CCWSD, the operating expense contingency for the Golden Gate System as budgeted by the FGUA for the Computation Period was increased to approximately $234,000 or 10.0% of total recognized operating expenses (excluding the PILT payment) to account for unknown or unanticipated expenditures associated with the consolidation of the respective utility systems. This amount is included in the overall reduction in expenditures discussed in Item 3. 6. For the purposes of this analysis, it was assumed that the acquisition price for the Golden Gate System would be equal to the outstanding debt of the Golden Gate System, which was $39,871,983 (principal amount) as of September 30, 2016 and is anticipated to be $38,658,753 as of September 30, 2017. Although the County may choose to issue new debt with a different structure and repayment terms, it was recognized for this analysis that the County would assume the outstanding debt and corresponding debt service payment structure of the Golden Gate System. Based on discussions with the FGUA, no additional debt is anticipated in the near future. The following table indicates the projected Golden Gate System principal amount of debt outstanding over the next few years that shows how the acquisition price might fluctuate depending upon the timing of the acquisition: Projected FGUA Golden Gate System Principal Amount of Debt Outstanding As of September 30, Debt Issue 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 FGUA Utility Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2010 $6,315,000 $6,315,000 $6,315,000 $6,315,000 $6,315,000 FGUA Utility Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2012 16,040,000 14,970,000 13,860,000 12,695,000 11,510,000 FGUA Utility Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2015 12,605,000 12,605,000 12,605,000 12,605,000 12,605,000 FGUA SRF Loan CS12090902P 656,137 570,464 482,235 391,374 297,802 FGUA SRF Loan DW1127 010 777,516 675,637 570,837 463,032 352,135 FGUA Utility Revenue Subordinate Bond, Series 2016 2,265,100 2,226,100 2,168,700 2,094,800 2,003,300 Total $38,658,753 $37,362,201 $36,001,772 $34,564,206 $33,083,237 - Probable outstanding debt assuming asset transfer in near-future. The annual debt service payments associated with these outstanding obligations are as follows: 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 9 of 32 Projected FGUA Golden Gate System Annual Debt Service Fiscal Year Ending September 30, Debt Issue 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 FGUA Utility Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2010 $347,325 $347,325 $347,325 $347,325 $347,325 FGUA Utility Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2012 1,662,375 1,666,375 1,663,575 1,663,075 1,659,775 FGUA Utility Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2015 509,463 509,463 509,463 509,463 509,463 FGUA SRF Loan CS12090902P 104,475 104,475 104,475 104,475 104,475 FGUA SRF Loan DW1127 010 123,296 123,295 123,296 123,296 123,296 FGUA Utility Revenue Subordinate Bond, Series 2016 58,230 90,715 108,023 123,029 138,745 Total $2,805,163 $2,841,648 $2,856,156 $2,870,663 $2,883,079 Based on historical precedent of other host governments that have acquired systems from the FGUA, we understand that there are two primary ways host governments may assume or pay- off the existing indebtedness of the system being acquired from the FGUA. The first option would be for the CCWSD to separately issue bonds which would be used to redeem the remaining outstanding debt owed by the FGUA on the Golden Gate System. The second option would be for the County to issue debt that would be used as security to repay the outstanding debt owed by the FGUA on the Golden Gate System. The debt issued by the County would be used to economically defease the outstanding debt over the remaining term of the FGUA's Golden Gate System debt. If the County were to move forward with acquiring the Golden Gate System from the FGUA, the County should engage its Financial Advisor so a more detailed analysis of the potential financing alternatives could be evaluated to determine the best financing alternative for the County. Observations and Findings Table 6 at the end of this technical memorandum indicates the estimated operating results of the CCWSD prior to acquisition of the Golden Gate System, while Table 7 provides the estimated impact to the CCWSD based on the primary assumptions discussed above. The analysis is not intended to be a comprehensive long-term evaluation of the financial effects from County ownership, but an initial estimate of the near-term change in revenues and expenses that may be incurred assuming the acquisition of the Golden Gate System by the County. The following provides a brief summary of our principal observations: 1. The full application of the CCWSD’s adopted Fiscal Year 2017 monthly user rates to the Golden Gate System is estimated to result in a reduction in user rate revenues of approximately $2.1 million or 27% (reflects lower CCWSD rates coupled with assumed price elasticity / water conservation adjustments) when compared with the revenues produced under existing Fiscal Year 2017 Golden Gate System rates. As previously mentioned, the Golden Gate System rates have historically been indexed annually based on 75% of the annual increases in the CPI. 2. This preliminary evaluation represents the estimated conditions at this time and does not currently consider any growth in the Golden Gate System service area. It is anticipated that growth will occur, either by infill development or extensions of service to currently unserved areas that have been developed but have on-site potable water wells and septic tanks instead of receiving regional service from the FGUA. For example, for every one (1) percent increase in the Golden Gate System customer base the County could expect to receive approximately $214,103 in impact fees if such fees were paid upfront at connection time instead of on an installment payment schedule. The additional funding could be used to offset expansion- related debt service or future expansion-related capital improvements. Furthermore, any net revenue margins resulting from new customer growth could potentially provide additional 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 10 of 32 financial benefits, depending on the net cost to serve and the ultimate timing of such new customer connections. 3. It is anticipated that certain positive operating expense synergies of approximately $812,000 (does not include increased PILT payment) exist which would provide a benefit to the Golden Gate System assuming County ownership. These positive synergies serve to reduce any economic effects (e.g., increased debt payments, loss of regulatory revenues, etc.) of acquiring the Golden Gate System by the County. 4. The following table provides a summary of changes to key performance metrics from the consolidation of the Golden Gate System with the CCWSD: Comparison of Effects to Consolidation of Golden Gate System and CCWSD [1] Description CCWSD Results Prior to Acquisition [2] Combined Results – Golden Gate System Customers Charged FGUA Golden Gate Rates [3] Combined Results – Golden Gate System Customers Charged CCWSD Rates [4] FY 2017 Est. Revenues and Transfers from Other County Funds [5] $134,956,728 $142,766,468 $140,662,904 Change in Net Cash Flow [6] $- $1,946,570 ($2,103,565) Surplus / (Deficiency) as % of Revenue 0.00% 1.39% (1.52%) All-In Debt Coverage Ratio (Target Minimum = 150%) 259% 247% 237% Debt Ratio (Outstanding Debt to Net Plant – Max 50%) 17.51% 20.99% 20.99% Other Financial Metrics: Debt per Account [7] $1,333 $1,569 $1,569 Debt per ERC [8] $926 $1,093 $1,093 Operating Ratio [9] 64.91% 63.48% 64.44% Free Cash as Percent of Depreciation [10] 67.78% 69.11% 64.34% __________ [1] Amounts shown derived from Table 7. [2] Reflects projected financial metrics for the CCWSD prior to consolidation of the Golden Gate System with the CCWSD. [3] Assumes County would continue to charge Golden Gate System customers the existing Golden Gate System rates subsequent to the acquisition of the system. [4] Assumes County would implement CCWSD rates for Golden Gate System customers subsequent to the acquisition of the Golden Gate System. [5] Includes transfers from Fund 470: Solid Waste Disposal and Fund 473: Mandatory Collection. [6] Change in net cash flow defined as available revenues after the payment of operating expenses and all required transfers. [7] Debt outstanding per total estimated water and wastewater customer accounts to be served by the consolidated system. [8] Debt outstanding to total estimated water and wastewater ERCs to be served by the consolidated system. [9] Operating expenses excluding depreciation divided by operating revenues. [10] Cash after payment of operating expenses and debt service divided by annual depreciation expense. As can be seen in the prior table, the acquisition of the Golden Gate System is expected to result in either an increase or a decline in cash flows dependent upon whether the Golden Gate System customers are charged for utility service at the existing Golden Gate System rates or the currently lower CCWSD rates. Under either condition, the performance metrics evaluated are expected to decline but still remain in a very positive position. The reduction in the financial ratios is due primarily to the increase in overall debt outstanding associated with the acquisition, which can be observed by the increase in the debt per ERC ratio as shown in the prior table (the Golden System is highly leveraged as previously discussed – greater amount of debt per plant investment when compared to the County's leverage position). To provide additional information to the County, PRMG has estimated that the County would need to contribute approximately $34 million from existing fund balances / operating reserves to fund a portion of the cost of acquisition in order to maintain the current CCWSD Debt Outstanding to Net Plant Ratio of 18%. This estimated buy-down in acquisition debt would allow the County to be in approximately the same relative leveraging position (Debt Outstanding to Net 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 11 of 32 Plant relationship) as it was prior to the acquisition and would potentially free up available borrowing capacity to fund future capital improvement projects. However, the County's projected liquidity (reserve balances) would be reduced as a result of such a buy-down of the debt associated with the acquisition. The County will need to evaluate or consider which Golden Gate regionalization strategy to undertake if the acquisition of the Golden Gate System is considered to be in the County's best interests. 5. If the County decides to proceed with the acquisition, the County must conduct a public hearing pursuant to Florida Statutes, Section 125.3401. The requirements of the Florida Statutes are as follows: 125.3401 Purchase, sale, or privatization of water, sewer, or wastewater reuse utility by county.—No county may purchase or sell a water, sewer, or wastewater reuse utility that provides service to the public for compensation, or enter into a wastewater facility privatization contract for a wastewater facility, until the governing body of the county has held a public hearing on the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract and made a determination that the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract is in the public interest. In determining if the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract is in the public interest, the county shall consider, at a minimum, the following: (1) The most recent available income and expense statement for the utility; (2) The most recent available balance sheet for the utility, listing assets and liabilities and clearly showing the amount of contributions-in-aid-of-construction and the accumulated depreciation thereon; (3) A statement of the existing rate base of the utility for regulatory purposes; (4) The physical condition of the utility facilities being purchased, sold, or subject to a wastewater facility privatization contract; (5) The reasonableness of the purchase, sales, or wastewater facility privatization contract price and terms; (6) The impacts of the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract on utility customers, both positive and negative; (7)(a) Any additional investment required and the ability and willingness of the purchaser, or the private firm under a wastewater facility privatization contract, to make that investment, whether the purchaser is the county or the entity purchasing the utility from the county; (7)(b) In the case of a wastewater facility privatization contract, the terms and conditions on which the private firm will provide capital investment and financing or a combination thereof for contemplated capital replacements, additions, expansions, and repairs. The county shall give significant weight to this criteria. (8) The alternatives to the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract, and the potential impact on utility customers if the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract is not made; and (9)(a) The ability of the purchaser or the private firm under a wastewater facility privatization contract to provide and maintain high-quality and cost-effective utility service, whether the purchaser is the county or the entity purchasing the utility from the county. (9)(b) In the case of a wastewater facility privatization contract, the county shall give significant weight to the technical expertise and experience of the private firm in 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 12 of 32 carrying out the obligations specified in the wastewater facility privatization contract. (10) All moneys paid by a private firm to a county pursuant to a wastewater facility privatization contract shall be used for the purpose of reducing or offsetting property taxes, wastewater service rates, or debt reduction or making infrastructure improvements or capital asset expenditures or other public purpose; provided, however, nothing herein shall preclude the county from using all or part of the moneys for the purpose of the county’s qualification for relief from the repayment of federal grant awards associated with the wastewater system as may be required by federal law or regulation. The county shall prepare a statement showing that the purchase, sale, or wastewater facility privatization contract is in the public interest, including a summary of the purchaser’s or private firm’s experience in water, sewer, and wastewater reuse utility operation and a showing of financial ability to provide the service, whether the purchaser or private firm is the county or the entity purchasing the utility from the county. In summary and based on the results of the attached preliminary analysis, it appears that if the County were to acquire the Golden Gate System and transition the Golden Gate System customers to CCWSD, the rate relief for the Golden Gate System customers could be significant. Although there would be reduction in several financial metrics of the CCWSD, the acquisition is not anticipated to result in an immediate reduction to the credit rating of the CCWSD from a financial standpoint. It should be noted, however, that future credit rating activity is speculative and based on multiple factors, and no assurances can be provided on the outcome. If the acquisition financing plan developed with the County's Financial Advisor involves the issuance of additional revenue bonds, the County would most likely seek credit ratings from Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and Fitch Ratings to help sell the bonds. It is advisable that the County take care in performing adequate due diligence in evaluating the condition of the Golden Gate System infrastructure since additional not yet identified capital improvements associated with the Golden Gate System could result in greater reductions to the financial condition of the CCWSD System above what was evaluated in this analysis. Additionally, it is important to mention the estimated effects of the potential acquisition and consolidation of the Golden Gate System with the CCWSD represents a high-level analysis performed by PRMG. If the County is considering the consolidation of the two utility systems, it is recommended that a more comprehensive long-term financial forecast and evaluation be considered regarding: i) the costs and operating synergies of the consolidated systems; ii) the appropriate level of renewal and replacement funding for the Golden Gate System; and iii) the appropriate rate structure phasing / strategies and options to the CCWSD rate levels and structure be developed to assist in the overall transition of the Golden Gate System to County ownership. 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Table Number Description Table 1 Golden Gate System Rate Revenue Estimate for Fiscal Year 2017 Under FGUA-Golden Gate Rates Table 2 Golden Gate System Rate Revenue Estimate for Fiscal Year 2017 Under CCWSD Rates Table 3 Bill Comparison - Fiscal Year 2017 FGUA Golden Gate System Rates vs. CCWSD Rates Table 4 Summary of Projected Capital Improvement Program as Provided by FGUA Table 5 Estimated Consolidation Adjustments to FGUA-Golden Gate System Table 6 Estimated Consolidation Adjustments to Collier County Water-Sewer District System Table 7 Summary of Consolidated Operations Collier County Water-Sewer District Financial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition ANALYSIS TABLES 6/8/2017; 1:55 PM 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 13 of 32 2017 Line Billing Billing No. Description Frequency Rates Determinants Revenues WATER RATE REVENUES Residential Water - Base Charges Base Charge By Meter Size 1 5/8" $27.48 3,182 $1,049,296 2 3/4" 27.48 90 29,678 3 1" 68.72 5 4,123 4 Totals 3,277 $1,083,098 Residential Water - Volumetric Charges Volumetric Charges 5 0 to 6,000 gallons 78.91% $6.21 164,887 $1,023,948 6 6,001 to 10,000 gallons 13.39% 6.82 27,984 190,848 7 10,001 to 20,000 gallons 5.65% 7.76 11,810 91,648 8 Above 20,000 gallons 2.04% 9.69 4,265 41,330 9 Totals 100.00% 208,946 $1,347,774 10 Total Residential Water Rate Revenue $2,430,872 Commercial Water - Base Charges Base Charge By Meter Size 11 5/8" $27.48 190 $62,654 12 3/4" 27.48 5 1,649 13 1" 68.72 42 34,635 14 1-1/2" 137.41 37 61,010 15 2" 219.87 18 47,492 16 3" 439.76 6 31,663 17 Totals 298 $239,103 Commercial Water - Volumetric Charges Volumetric Charges 18 All Usage 100.00% $6.49 84,238 $546,706 19 Totals 100.00% 84,238 $546,706 20 Total Commercial Water Rate Revenue $785,809 Fiscal Year Ending September 30, Table 1 Collier County Water-Sewer District Financial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition Golden Gate System Rate Revenue Estimate for Fiscal Year 2017 Under FGUA-Golden Gate Rates 6/8/2017; 4:44 PM 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 14 of 32 2017 Line Billing Billing No. Description Frequency Rates Determinants Revenues Fiscal Year Ending September 30, Table 1 Collier County Water-Sewer District Financial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition Golden Gate System Rate Revenue Estimate for Fiscal Year 2017 Under FGUA-Golden Gate Rates Multi-Family Water - Base Charges Base Charge By Meter Size 21 5/8" $27.48 44 $14,509 22 1" 68.72 33 27,213 23 1-1/2" 137.41 12 19,787 24 2" 219.87 12 31,661 25 4" 687.13 2 16,491 26 6" 1,374.26 2 32,982 27 8" 2,198.81 1 26,386 28 Totals 106 $169,030 Multi-Family Water - Volumetric Charges Volumetric Charges 29 All Usage 100.00% $6.49 115,982 $752,721 30 Totals 100.00% 115,982 $752,721 31 Total Multi-Family Water Rate Revenue $921,751 32 TOTAL WATER RATE REVENUE $4,138,432 6/8/2017; 4:44 PM 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 15 of 32 2017 Line Billing Billing No. Description Frequency Rates Determinants Revenues Fiscal Year Ending September 30, Table 1 Collier County Water-Sewer District Financial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition Golden Gate System Rate Revenue Estimate for Fiscal Year 2017 Under FGUA-Golden Gate Rates WASTEWATER RATE REVENUES Residential Wastewater - Base Charges Base Charge By Meter Size 33 5/8" $35.85 1,997 $859,109 34 3/4" 35.85 12 5,162 35 1" 35.85 1 430 36 Totals 2,010 $864,702 Residential Wastewater - Volumetric Charges Volumetric Charges 37 Up to 6,000 Gallons Billing Cap 78.91% $7.16 99,578 $712,981 38 Above 6,000 Gallons 21.09% 0.00 26,608 0 39 Totals 100.00% 126,186 $712,981 40 Total Residential Wastewater Rate Revenue $1,577,683 Commercial Wastewater - Base Charges Base Charge By Meter Size 41 5/8" $35.85 67 $28,823 42 3/4" 35.85 80 34,416 43 1" 89.61 24 25,808 44 1-1/2" 179.21 29 62,365 45 2" 286.73 7 24,085 46 3" 537.63 6 38,709 47 Totals 213 $214,207 Commercial Wastewater - Volumetric Charges Volumetric Charges 48 All Flow 100.00% $8.59 60,888 $523,031 49 Totals 100.00% 60,888 $523,031 50 Total Commercial Wastewater Rate Revenue $737,238 6/8/2017; 4:44 PM 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 16 of 32 2017 Line Billing Billing No. Description Frequency Rates Determinants Revenues Fiscal Year Ending September 30, Table 1 Collier County Water-Sewer District Financial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition Golden Gate System Rate Revenue Estimate for Fiscal Year 2017 Under FGUA-Golden Gate Rates Multi-Family Wastewater - Base Charges Base Charge By Meter Size 51 5/8" $35.85 9 $3,872 52 3/4" 35.85 13 5,593 53 1" 89.61 32 34,410 54 1-1/2" 179.21 10 21,505 55 2" 286.73 11 37,848 56 4" 896.07 2 21,506 57 6" 1,792.12 2 43,011 58 8" 2,867.40 1 34,409 59 Totals 80 $202,154 Multi-Family Wastewater - Volumetric Charges Volumetric Charges 60 All Flow 100.00% $8.59 107,442 $922,930 61 Totals 100.00% 107,442 $922,930 62 Total Multi-Family Wastewater Rate Revenue $1,125,084 63 TOTAL WASTEWATER RATE REVENUE $3,440,004 64 TOTAL RATE REVENUE $7,578,436 6/8/2017; 4:44 PM 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 17 of 322017Revenues RevenuesAdjusted Under Unadjusted Under AdjustedLine Billing Billing Elasticity Billing Billing BillingNo. Description Frequency Rates Determinants Adjustment Determinants Determinants DeterminantsWATER RATE REVENUESResidential Water - Base ChargesBase Charge By Meter Size1 5/8" $21.19 3,182 3,182 $809,119 $809,1192 3/4"21.19 90 90 22,885 22,88531"46.77 5 5 2,806 2,8064 Totals3,277 3,277 $834,810 $834,810Residential Water - Volumetric ChargesVolumetric Charges [*]5 Block 1 71.73% $2.91 149,869 0 149,869 $436,119 $436,1196 Block 2 20.61% 4.38 43,058 0 43,058 188,594 188,5947 Block 3 5.63% 5.82 11,766 0 11,766 68,477 68,4778 Block 4 0.88% 7.27 1,838 0 1,838 13,365 13,3659 Block 5 0.58% 8.72 1,212 0 1,212 10,572 10,57210 Block 6 0.58% 11.62 1,203 0 1,203 13,974 13,97411 Totals 100.00% 208,946 0 208,946 $731,101 $731,10112Total Residential Water Rate Revenue$1,565,911 $1,565,911Commercial Water - Base ChargesBase Charge By Meter Size13 5/8" $21.19 190 190 $48,313 $48,31314 3/4"21.19 5 5 1,271 1,27115 1"46.77 42 42 23,572 23,57216 1-1/2" 89.17 37 37 39,591 39,59117 2"139.98 18 18 30,236 30,23618 3"258.76 6 6 18,631 18,63119 Totals298 298 $161,615 $161,615Fiscal Year Ending September 30,Golden Gate System Rate Revenue Estimate for Fiscal Year 2017 Under CCWSD RatesTable 2Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition6/8/2017; 4:45 PM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 18 of 322017Revenues RevenuesAdjusted Under Unadjusted Under AdjustedLine Billing Billing Elasticity Billing Billing BillingNo. Description Frequency Rates Determinants Adjustment Determinants Determinants DeterminantsFiscal Year Ending September 30,Golden Gate System Rate Revenue Estimate for Fiscal Year 2017 Under CCWSD RatesTable 2Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System AcquisitionCommercial Water - Volumetric ChargesVolumetric Charges [*]20 Block 1 28.87% $2.91 24,323 0 24,323 $70,779 $70,77921 Block 2 16.86% 4.38 14,200 0 14,200 62,195 62,19522 Block 3 18.70% 5.82 15,755 0 15,755 91,697 91,69723 Block 4 10.29% 7.27 8,669 0 8,669 63,021 63,02124 Block 5 12.08% 8.72 10,173 0 10,173 88,710 88,71025 Block 6 13.20% 11.62 11,119 (2,780) 8,339 129,198 96,89826 Totals 100.00% 84,238 (2,780) 81,459 $505,599 $473,30027Total Commercial Water Rate Revenue$667,214 $634,914Multi-Family Water - Base ChargesBase Charge By Meter Size28 5/8" $21.19 44 44 $11,188 $11,18829 1"46.77 33 33 18,521 18,52130 1-1/2" 89.17 12 12 12,840 12,84031 2"139.98 12 12 20,157 20,15732 4"428.36 2 2 10,281 10,28133 6"852.35 2 2 20,456 20,45634 8" 1,361.13 1 1 16,334 16,33435 Totals106 106 $109,777 $109,7776/8/2017; 4:45 PM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 19 of 322017Revenues RevenuesAdjusted Under Unadjusted Under AdjustedLine Billing Billing Elasticity Billing Billing BillingNo. Description Frequency Rates Determinants Adjustment Determinants Determinants DeterminantsFiscal Year Ending September 30,Golden Gate System Rate Revenue Estimate for Fiscal Year 2017 Under CCWSD RatesTable 2Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System AcquisitionMulti-Family Water - Volumetric ChargesVolumetric Charges [*]36 Block 1 17.53% $2.91 20,333 0 20,333 $59,170 $59,17037 Block 2 12.75% 4.38 14,782 0 14,782 64,746 64,74638 Block 3 13.90% 5.82 16,127 0 16,127 93,859 93,85939 Block 4 9.99% 7.27 11,588 0 11,588 84,247 84,24740 Block 5 7.98% 8.72 9,256 0 9,256 80,708 80,70841 Block 6 37.85% 11.62 43,895 (10,974) 32,922 510,065 382,54942 Totals 100.00% 115,982 (10,974) 105,008 $892,795 $765,27943Total Multi-Family Water Rate Revenue$1,002,572 $875,05644TOTAL WATER RATE REVENUE$3,235,697$3,075,882WASTEWATER RATE REVENUESResidential Wastewater - Base ChargesBase Charge By Meter Size45 5/8" $32.37 1,997 1,997 $775,715 $775,71546 3/4"32.37 12 12 4,661 4,66147 1"73.61 1 1 883 88348 Totals2,010 2,010 $781,259 $781,259Residential Wastewater - Volumetric ChargesVolumetric Charges49 Up to 15,000 Gallons Billing Cap 96.63% $4.56 121,930 121,930 $555,999 $555,99950 Above 15,000 Gallons 3.37% 0.00 4,257 4,257 0 051 Totals 100.00% 126,186 126,186 $555,999 $555,99952Total Residential Wastewater Rate Revenue$1,337,259 $1,337,2596/8/2017; 4:45 PM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 20 of 322017Revenues RevenuesAdjusted Under Unadjusted Under AdjustedLine Billing Billing Elasticity Billing Billing BillingNo. Description Frequency Rates Determinants Adjustment Determinants Determinants DeterminantsFiscal Year Ending September 30,Golden Gate System Rate Revenue Estimate for Fiscal Year 2017 Under CCWSD RatesTable 2Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System AcquisitionCommercial Wastewater - Base ChargesBase Charge By Meter Size53 5/8" $32.37 67 67 $26,025 $26,02554 3/4"32.37 80 80 31,075 31,07555 1"73.61 24 24 21,200 21,20056 1-1/2" 142.42 29 29 49,562 49,56257 2"225.04 7 7 18,903 18,90358 3"417.71 6 6 30,075 30,07559 Totals213 213 $176,841 $176,841Commercial Wastewater - Volumetric ChargesVolumetric Charges60 All Flow 100.00% $4.56 60,888 60,888 $277,651 $277,65161 Totals 100.00% 60,888 60,888 $277,651 $277,65162Total Commercial Wastewater Rate Revenue$454,492 $454,492Multi-Family Wastewater - Base ChargesBase Charge By Meter Size63 5/8" $32.37 9 9 $3,496 $3,49664 3/4"32.37 13 13 5,050 5,05065 1"73.61 32 32 28,266 28,26666 1-1/2" 142.42 10 10 17,090 17,09067 2"225.04 11 11 29,705 29,70568 4"692.67 2 2 16,624 16,62469 6" 1,380.40 2 2 33,130 33,13070 8" 2,205.95 1 1 26,471 26,47171 Totals80 80 $159,833 $159,8336/8/2017; 4:45 PM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 21 of 322017Revenues RevenuesAdjusted Under Unadjusted Under AdjustedLine Billing Billing Elasticity Billing Billing BillingNo. Description Frequency Rates Determinants Adjustment Determinants Determinants DeterminantsFiscal Year Ending September 30,Golden Gate System Rate Revenue Estimate for Fiscal Year 2017 Under CCWSD RatesTable 2Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System AcquisitionMulti-Family Wastewater - Volumetric ChargesVolumetric Charges72 All Flow 100.00% $4.56 107,442 107,442 $489,937 $489,93773 Totals 100.00% 107,442 107,442 $489,937 $489,93774Total Multi-Family Wastewater Rate Revenue$649,770 $649,77075TOTAL WASTEWATER RATE REVENUE$2,441,521$2,441,52176TOTAL RATE REVENUE$5,677,218$5,517,402Footnotes:[*] All water is billed in accordance with the water consumption per block based on the size of meter in service. The consumption blocks are as follows:Meter SizeBlock 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 Block 5 Block 65/8" 0 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 20 21 to 30 31 to 50 Over 503/4" 0 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 20 21 to 30 31 to 50 Over 501" 0 to 12 13 to 25 26 to 50 51 to 75 76 to 120 Over 1201-1/4" 0 to 20 21 to 40 41 to 80 81 to 120 121 to 200 Over 2001-1/2" 0 to 25 26 to 50 51 to 100 101 to 150 151 to 250 Over 2502" 0 to 40 41 to 80 81 to 160 161 to 240 241 to 400 Over 4003" 0 to 80 81 to 160 161 to 320 321 to 480 481 to 800 Over 8004" 0 to 120 121 to 250 251 to 500 501 to 800 801 to 1,200 Over 1,2006" 0 to 250 251 to 500 501 to 1,000 1,001 to 1,500 1,501 to 2,500 Over 2,5008" 0 to 450 451 to 900 901 to 1,800 1,801 to 2,700 2,701 to 4,500 Over 4,50010" 0 to 700 701 to 1,450 1,451 to 2,900 2,901 to 4,300 4,301 to 7,000 Over 7,00012" 0 to 1,075 1,076 to 2,150 2,151 to 4,300 4,301 to 6,450 6,451 to 11,000 Over 11,000Consumption Block (Thousands of Gallons)6/8/2017; 4:45 PM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 22 of 32 WATER BILL Line No. 1 Base Rate $27.48 Base Rate $21.19 Rate per kgal Rate per kgal 2 0 to 6,000 gallons $6.21 0 to 5,000 gallons $2.91 3 6,001 to 10,000 gallons 6.82 6,000 to 10,000 gallons 4.38 4 10,001 to 20,000 gallons 7.76 11,000 to 20,000 gallons 5.82 5 Over 20,000 gallons 9.69 21,000 to 30,000 gallons 7.27 6 31,000 to 50,000 gallons 8.72 7 Over 50,000 gallons 11.62 Existing New Monthly Use Water Monthly Use Water % of Bills (gal) Bill (gal) Bill Amount % Rendered 8 0 $27.48 0 $21.19 ($6.29) -22.9% 4.6% 9 1,000 33.69 1,000 24.10 (9.59) -28.5% 9.8% 10 2,000 39.90 2,000 27.01 (12.89) -32.3% 19.8% 11 3,000 46.11 3,000 29.92 (16.19) -35.1% 33.0% 12 4,000 52.32 4,000 32.83 (19.49) -37.3% 47.4% 13 5,000 58.53 5,000 35.74 (22.79) -38.9% 61.0% 14 6,000 64.74 6,000 40.12 (24.62) -38.0% 72.0% 15 7,000 71.56 7,000 44.50 (27.06) -37.8% 80.1% 16 8,000 78.38 8,000 48.88 (29.50) -37.6% 86.0% 17 9,000 85.20 9,000 53.26 (31.94) -37.5% 90.0% 18 10,000 92.02 10,000 57.64 (34.38) -37.4% 92.6% 19 11,000 99.78 11,000 63.46 (36.32) -36.4% 94.4% 20 12,000 107.54 12,000 69.28 (38.26) -35.6% 95.7% 21 13,000 115.30 13,000 75.10 (40.20) -34.9% 96.7% 22 14,000 123.06 14,000 80.92 (42.14) -34.2% 97.4% 23 15,000 130.82 15,000 86.74 (44.08) -33.7% 97.9% 24 16,000 138.58 16,000 92.56 (46.02) -33.2% 98.3% 25 17,000 146.34 17,000 98.38 (47.96) -32.8% 98.6% 26 18,000 154.10 18,000 104.20 (49.90) -32.4% 98.9% 27 19,000 161.86 19,000 110.02 (51.84) -32.0% 99.1% 28 20,000 169.62 20,000 115.84 (53.78) -31.7% 99.2% 29 25,000 218.07 25,000 152.19 (65.88) -30.2% 99.6% 30 30,000 266.52 30,000 188.54 (77.98) -29.3% 99.7% 31 35,000 314.97 35,000 232.14 (82.83) -26.3% 99.8% 32 40,000 363.42 40,000 275.74 (87.68) -24.1% 99.9% 33 45,000 411.87 45,000 319.34 (92.53) -22.5% 99.9% 34 50,000 460.32 50,000 362.94 (97.38) -21.2% 99.9% Table 3 Collier County Water-Sewer District Financial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition Bill Comparison - Fiscal Year 2017 FGUA Golden Gate System Rates vs. CCWSD Rates Approximately 89% of FGUA Golden Gate Water Customers and 87% of Wastewater Customers are 5/8" Meter Residential Customers Change Existing FGUA Golden Gate System Monthly Water Rates Collier County Water-Sewer District Monthly Water Rates 6/8/2017;4:45 PM 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 23 of 32 Table 3 Collier County Water-Sewer District Financial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition Bill Comparison - Fiscal Year 2017 FGUA Golden Gate System Rates vs. CCWSD Rates Approximately 89% of FGUA Golden Gate Water Customers and 87% of Wastewater Customers are 5/8" Meter Residential Customers WASTEWATER BILL Line No. 35 Base Rate $35.85 Base Rate $32.37 Rate per kgal Rate per kgal 36 All Billed Consumption $7.16 All Billed Consumption $4.56 (capped at 6,000 gallons) (capped at 15,000 gallons) Existing New Monthly Use Water Monthly Use Water % of Bills (gal) Bill (gal) Bill Amount % Rendered 37 0 $35.85 0 $32.37 ($3.48) -9.7% 4.6% 38 1,000 43.01 1,000 36.93 (6.08) -14.1% 9.8% 39 2,000 50.17 2,000 41.49 (8.68) -17.3% 19.8% 40 3,000 57.33 3,000 46.05 (11.28) -19.7% 33.0% 41 4,000 64.49 4,000 50.61 (13.88) -21.5% 47.4% 42 5,000 71.65 5,000 55.17 (16.48) -23.0% 61.0% 43 6,000 78.81 6,000 59.73 (19.08) -24.2% 72.0% 44 7,000 78.81 7,000 64.29 (14.52) -18.4% 80.1% 45 8,000 78.81 8,000 68.85 (9.96) -12.6% 86.0% 46 9,000 78.81 9,000 73.41 (5.40) -6.9% 90.0% 47 10,000 78.81 10,000 77.97 (0.84) -1.1% 92.6% 48 11,000 78.81 11,000 82.53 3.72 4.7% 94.4% 49 12,000 78.81 12,000 87.09 8.28 10.5% 95.7% 50 13,000 78.81 13,000 91.65 12.84 16.3% 96.7% 51 14,000 78.81 14,000 96.21 17.40 22.1% 97.4% 52 15,000 78.81 15,000 100.77 21.96 27.9% 97.9% 53 16,000 78.81 16,000 100.77 21.96 27.9% 98.3% 54 17,000 78.81 17,000 100.77 21.96 27.9% 98.6% 55 18,000 78.81 18,000 100.77 21.96 27.9% 98.9% 56 19,000 78.81 19,000 100.77 21.96 27.9% 99.1% 57 20,000 78.81 20,000 100.77 21.96 27.9% 99.2% 58 25,000 78.81 25,000 100.77 21.96 27.9% 99.6% 59 30,000 78.81 30,000 100.77 21.96 27.9% 99.7% 60 35,000 78.81 35,000 100.77 21.96 27.9% 99.8% 61 40,000 78.81 40,000 100.77 21.96 27.9% 99.9% 62 45,000 78.81 45,000 100.77 21.96 27.9% 99.9% 63 50,000 78.81 50,000 100.77 21.96 27.9% 99.9% Existing FGUA Golden Gate System Monthly Wastewater Rates Collier County Water-Sewer District Monthly Wastewater Rates Change 6/8/2017;4:45 PM 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 24 of 32 Table 3 Collier County Water-Sewer District Financial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition Bill Comparison - Fiscal Year 2017 FGUA Golden Gate System Rates vs. CCWSD Rates Approximately 89% of FGUA Golden Gate Water Customers and 87% of Wastewater Customers are 5/8" Meter Residential Customers COMBINED BILL Existing New Line Monthly Use Water Monthly Use Water % of Bills No.(gal) Bill (gal) Bill Amount % Rendered 64 0 $63.33 0 $53.56 ($9.77) -15.4% 4.6% 65 1,000 76.70 1,000 61.03 (15.67) -20.4% 9.8% 66 2,000 90.07 2,000 68.50 (21.57) -23.9% 19.8% 67 3,000 103.44 3,000 75.97 (27.47) -26.6% 33.0% 68 4,000 116.81 4,000 83.44 (33.37) -28.6% 47.4% 69 5,000 130.18 5,000 90.91 (39.27) -30.2% 61.0% 70 6,000 143.55 6,000 99.85 (43.70) -30.4% 72.0% 71 7,000 150.37 7,000 108.79 (41.58) -27.7% 80.1% 72 8,000 157.19 8,000 117.73 (39.46) -25.1% 86.0% 73 9,000 164.01 9,000 126.67 (37.34) -22.8% 90.0% 74 10,000 170.83 10,000 135.61 (35.22) -20.6% 92.6% 75 11,000 178.59 11,000 145.99 (32.60) -18.3% 94.4% 76 12,000 186.35 12,000 156.37 (29.98) -16.1% 95.7% 77 13,000 194.11 13,000 166.75 (27.36) -14.1% 96.7% 78 14,000 201.87 14,000 177.13 (24.74) -12.3% 97.4% 79 15,000 209.63 15,000 187.51 (22.12) -10.6% 97.9% 80 16,000 217.39 16,000 193.33 (24.06) -11.1% 98.3% 81 17,000 225.15 17,000 199.15 (26.00) -11.5% 98.6% 82 18,000 232.91 18,000 204.97 (27.94) -12.0% 98.9% 83 19,000 240.67 19,000 210.79 (29.88) -12.4% 99.1% 84 20,000 248.43 20,000 216.61 (31.82) -12.8% 99.2% 85 25,000 296.88 25,000 252.96 (43.92) -14.8% 99.6% 86 30,000 345.33 30,000 289.31 (56.02) -16.2% 99.7% 87 35,000 393.78 35,000 332.91 (60.87) -15.5% 99.8% 88 40,000 442.23 40,000 376.51 (65.72) -14.9% 99.9% 89 45,000 490.68 45,000 420.11 (70.57) -14.4% 99.9% 90 50,000 539.13 50,000 463.71 (75.42) -14.0% 99.9% Change 6/8/2017;4:45 PM 11.D.2 Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 25 of 32Table 4Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System AcquisitionSummary of Projected Capital Improvement Program as Provided by FGUALine5-YearNo. Description 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 TotalCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - WATER SYSTEM1 Water Treatment Facility (WTF) Improvements 288,268$ 295,853$ 303,663$ 298,583$ 357,251$ 1,543,618$ 2 Distribution System Improvements 255,095 243,141 303,663 320,523 311,557 1,433,979 3 Water Meter Replacement 200,000 253,050 271,815 272,292 269,349 1,266,506 Carryforward Projects:4 Install a Sodium Hydroxide Feed System at the WTP 67,788 - - - - 67,788 5 Geen Blvd Booster Station GST Rehab. 5,874 - - - - 5,874 6 WTP Replace High Service Pump #2 Discharge Valve 2,306 - - - - 2,306 7 Install Sodium Hydroxide Feed System Control 32,822 - - - - 32,822 8 Total Water System Capital Improvement Program 852,153 792,044 879,141 891,398 938,157 4,352,893 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - WASTEWATER SYSTEM9 Collection System Improvements 215,288$ 481,997$ 344,152$ 314,799$ 311,557$ 1,667,793$ 10 Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) Improvements 268,365 243,141 303,663 343,417 311,557 1,470,143 11 Lift Station Improvements 112,360 - - - - 112,360 12 Seven Springs WWTP Improvements 1,366,122 - - - - 1,366,122 Carryforward Projects:13 Life Station Pump Replacement and Improvement 4,194 - - - - 4,194 13 WWTP Drain and Clean Plant #2 Including Diffusers in Support of Plant Rehab Work 5,942 - - - - 5,942 14 WWTP Drain and Clean Plant #1 for Upcoming Plant Rehab Work. 97,218 - - - - 97,218 14 Extend 8-inch Force Main at CR-951 and Pine Ridge Road 866 - - - - 866 15 Total Wastewater System Capital Improvement Program 2,070,355 725,138 647,815 658,216 623,114 4,724,638 16 Total Capital Improvement Program 2,922,508$ 1,517,182$ 1,526,956$ 1,549,614$ 1,561,271$ 9,077,531$ Fiscal Year Ending September 30,6/8/2017; 4:59 PM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 26 of 32Table 5Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition Estimated Consolidation Adjustments to FGUA-Golden Gate SystemFY 2017 FY 2017Line Fiscal Year Consolidation Adjustments and Efficiency Gains Net Golden Gate Rate Adjustments to CCWSD Rates Net Golden GateNo. Description 2017 Budget [1] Basis and Comments Amount Under Golden Gate Rates Basis and Comments Amount Under CCWSD RatesOperating Revenues and Income1 Water Revenue 4,142,460$ Assumes Golden Gate Rates [2] (4,028)$ 4,138,432$ Adj. to CCWSD Rates [2] (1,062,550)$ 3,075,882$ 2 Wastewater Revenue 3,486,754 Assumes Golden Gate Rates [2] - 3,440,004 Adj. to CCWSD Rates [2] (998,484) 2,441,521 3 Unbilled Water Revenue 43,794 Not Applicable Under County Ownership (43,794) - - - 4 Unbilled Wastewater Revenue 35,398 Not Applicable Under County Ownership (35,398) - - - 5 Fire Line Revenue 11,865 - 11,865 - 11,865 6 Water Impact Fees 1,950 Remove Impact Fee Revenues - Non-recurring (1,950) - - - 7 Wastewater Impact Fees 1,525 Remove Impact Fee Revenues - Non-recurring (1,525) - - - 8 Late Fees 156,385 - 156,385 Reduction Due to Lower Revenues (42,531) 113,854 9 Opus Miscellaneous Fees 45,686 - 45,686 - 45,686 10 Connect / Reconnect Fee 11,643 - 11,643 - 11,643 11 Meter Set Fees 250 - 250 - 250 12 Inspection Fees 255 - 255 - 255 13 Plan Review / LOA Fees 2,000 - 2,000 - 2,000 14 General Miscellaneous Revenue 3,220 - 3,220 - 3,220 15 Total Revenues 7,943,185$ (86,695)$ 7,809,740$ (2,103,565)$ 5,706,176$ Operating Expenses [3]General and Administrative16 Indirect Costs - Board Expenses $27,065 BOCC Expenses Not Increased with Acquisition (27,065)$ -$ -$ -$ 17 General Fund Transfer 7,800 Regional Cost Already Incurred by County (7,800) - - - 18 Banking Services 18,227 Regional Cost Already Incurred by County (18,227) - - - 19 Bank Fee Earnings Allowance (304) Regional Benefit Already Incurred by County 304 - - - 20 Merchant Services (CC Proc) 35,706 Regional Cost Already Incurred by County (35,706) - - - 21 Lockbox Services 4,006 Regional Cost Already Incurred by County (4,006) - - - 22 Collection Agency Fees 1,496 Regional Cost Already Incurred by County (1,496) - - - 23 Property and Casualty Insurance 28,891 - 28,891 - 28,891 24 Copying Charges 62 - 62 - 62 25 Legal Ads 426 Regional Cost Already Incurred by County (426) - - - 26 Bad Debt Expenses 152,584 Adjusted Based on Changes in Revenue Collections (1,016) 151,568 (41,221) 110,348 27 Regulatory and Permit Fees 272,584 Lost Revenue to County (272,584) - - - 28 Cash Overage / Shortage 1 Not Applicable Under County Ownership (1) - - - 29 Reserve for Contingencies - 10.0% of Operating Expenses 233,880 233,880 - 233,880 30 Late Fees / Penalties / Fines 40 Not Applicable Under County Ownership (40) - - - 31 Payment-In-Lieu-of-Taxes (PILT) - County PILT Currently 5.25% of Revenues410,011 410,011 (110,437) 299,574 32 Total General and Administrative Expenses 548,584$ 275,829$ 824,413$ (151,658)$ 672,755$ Operating and Management Services33 Operations and Maintenance Services $1,754,908 Eliminated 15% Gross Margin (263,200)$ 1,491,863$ -$ 1,491,863$ 34 Additional Operations and Maintenance Services 36,164 - 36,164 - 36,164 35 Customer Service and Billing 250,462 Eliminated 15% Gross Margin and Customer Service Reps ($35k)(72,868) 177,594 - 177,594 36 Additional Customer Service and Billing 1,634 - 1,634 - 1,634 37 Management Contract 164,892 Collier County Management Exists, Not Applicable (164,892) - - - 38 Inspection Services 255 - 255 - 255 39 Plan Review / LOA Services 2,000 - 2,000 - 2,000 40 Security Monitoring Fee 2,031 - 2,031 - 2,031 41 Meter Expenses 238 - 238 - 238 42 Meter Service and Performance 17,900 - 17,900 - 17,900 43 Electricity Services 369,836 - 369,836 - 369,836 44 Building and Land Rental 33,560 Not Applicable Under County Ownership (33,560) - - - 45 Building Maintenance 10 - 10 - 10 46 ARC-GIS 6,131 Cost Already Incurred By County (6,131) - - - 47 Total Operating and Management Services Expenses 2,640,021$ (540,651)$ 2,099,525$ -$ 2,099,525$ 6/8/2017; 4:43 PM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 27 of 32Table 5Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition Estimated Consolidation Adjustments to FGUA-Golden Gate SystemFY 2017 FY 2017Line Fiscal Year Consolidation Adjustments and Efficiency Gains Net Golden Gate Rate Adjustments to CCWSD Rates Net Golden GateNo. Description 2017 Budget [1] Basis and Comments Amount Under Golden Gate Rates Basis and Comments Amount Under CCWSD RatesProfessional Services48 Indirect Professional Services $52,332-$ 52,332$ -$ 52,332$ 49 Legal Services - General Counsel 15,177 (15,177) - - - 50 Legal Services - Utility Counsel 2,910 - 2,910 - 2,910 51 Legal Services - Litigation 2,496 - 2,496 - 2,496 52 Other - - - - - 53 Total Professional Services Expenses 72,915$ (15,177)$ 57,738$ -$ 57,738$ Special Projects54 Indirect Costs - Special Projects $7,050 Cost Already Incurred by County (7,050)$ -$ -$ -$ 55 ARC - GIS Management 8,188 Cost Already Incurred by County (8,188) - - - 56 Performance Audit - Customer Billing 3,300 Cost Already Incurred by County (3,300) - - - 57 Customer Feasibility Study 15,914 Cost Already Incurred by County (15,914) - - - 58 Rate Studies 16,391 Cost Already Incurred by County (16,391) - - - 59 Mandatory WWC Program 30,179 Cost Already Incurred by County (30,179) - - - 60 Customer Info and Outreach 45 Cost Already Incurred by County (45) - - - 61 Total Special Projects Expenses $81,067 (81,067)$ -$ -$ -$ 62 Total Operating Expenses 3,342,587$ (361,066)$ 2,981,676$ (151,658)$ 2,830,018$ Other Revenue Requirements and TransfersDebt Service63 FGUA Utility Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2010 347,325$ -$ 347,325$ -$ 347,325$ 64 FGUA Utility Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2012 1,662,375 - 1,662,375 - 1,662,375 65 FGUA Utility Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2015 509,463 - 509,463 - 509,463 66 FGUA SRF Loan CS12090902P 104,475 - 104,475 - 104,475 67 FGUA SRF Loan DW1127 010 123,296 - 123,296 - 123,296 68 FGUA Utility Revenue Subordinate Bond, Series 2016 58,230 - 58,230 - 58,230 69 Total Debt Service 2,805,163$ -$ 2,805,163$ -$ 2,805,163$ 70 Transfer to R&R Fund and Other Capital Projects Transfer1,101,293$ Based on five year capital improvement plan [4] -$ 1,101,293$ -$ 1,101,293$ Transfer to Rate Stabilization Fund - Not Applicable Under County Ownership - - - - Transfer to Operating Reserves - Not Applicable Under County Ownership - - - - 71 Total Other Revenue Requirements and Transfers 3,906,456$ -$ 3,906,456$ -$ 3,906,456$ 72 Net Available for Other Purposes 694,142$ 274,371$ 921,609$ (1,951,907)$ (1,030,298)$ Footnotes:[1] Amounts shown derived from the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) Golden Gate System Fiscal Year 2017 adopted budget.[2][3][4]Estimated revenues based on application of Fiscal Year 2017 approved rates applied to assumed billing determinants.Operating expenses were adjusted for estimated cost savings as a result of County ownership.Based upon the projected five (5) year capital improvement plan as taken from the Fiscal Year 2017 adopted budget.6/8/2017; 4:43 PM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 28 of 32Table 6Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition Estimated Consolidation Adjustments to Collier County Water-Sewer District SystemLineEstimated Adjusted CCWSD System Consolidation Adjustments Fiscal Year No. Description 2017 [1] Adjustments 2017 Basis and Comments Amount 2017 AmountOperating Revenues, Income, and Transfers from Other County Funds1 Water System User Rate Revenues 58,093,226$ -$ 58,093,226$ -$ 58,093,226$ 2 Wastewater System Rate Revenue 67,170,821 - 67,170,821 - 67,170,821 3 IQ Water System Rate Revenue 3,383,517 - 3,383,517 - 3,383,517 4 Wholesale Water Revenue 243,022 - 243,022 - 243,022 5 Other Operating Revenue 2,841,700 - 2,841,700 - 2,841,700 6 Unrestricted Interest Income 686,542 - 686,542 - 686,542 7 Transfers from Other County Funds 2,537,900 - 2,537,900 - 2,537,900 8 Total 134,956,728$ -$ 134,956,728$ -$ 134,956,728$ Operating Expenses9 Public Utilities Division Administration 847,547$ -$ 847,547$ -$ 847,547$ 10 Utility Operations Center 1,220,102 - 1,220,102 - 1,220,102 11 Public Utilities Division Operations Support 10,311,307 - 10,311,307 - 10,311,307 12 Public Utilities Inventory Control 704,560 - 704,560 - 704,560 13 Wastewater Operations Administration 1,510,298 - 1,510,298 - 1,510,298 14 Water Operations Administration 1,644,944 - 1,644,944 - 1,644,944 15 Public Utility Stake and Locates 1,389,817 - 1,389,817 - 1,389,817 16 Public Utilities Department Tech 1,787,318 - 1,787,318 - 1,787,318 17 Collier County Water-Sewer District Client Billing 1,363,158 - 1,363,158 - 1,363,158 18 Accounting/Assessments/Estoppel Program 1,726,687 - 1,726,687 - 1,726,687 19 Public Utilities Division Customer Service 1,190,191 - 1,190,191 - 1,190,191 20 Contract Mgt and Utility Ordinance Enforcement 955,834 - 955,834 - 955,834 21 Public Utilities Planning and Project Management 3,228,333 - 3,228,333 - 3,228,333 22 NCWRF 6,513,457 - 6,513,457 - 6,513,457 23 IQ Maintenance 2,140,396 - 2,140,396 - 2,140,396 24 Power System and Instr. 1,455,338 - 1,455,338 - 1,455,338 25 Wastewater Compliance and Lab Services 1,130,112 - 1,130,112 - 1,130,112 26 Wastewater Field Operations 9,223,751 - 9,223,751 - 9,223,751 27 SCWRF 5,301,799 - 5,301,799 - 5,301,799 28 SCRWTP 6,097,143 - 6,097,143 - 6,097,143 29 Distribution 5,329,744 - 5,329,744 - 5,329,744 30 Wellfield / Outlying Stations Maintenance 4,136,824 - 4,136,824 - 4,136,824 31 Meter Operations 3,496,974 - 3,496,974 - 3,496,974 32 Water Power System And Instrumentation 1,145,563 - 1,145,563 - 1,145,563 33 NCRWTP 5,296,941 - 5,296,941 - 5,296,941 34 Northeast RWTP 190,569 - 190,569 - 190,569 35 Water Laboratory 1,049,972 - 1,049,972 - 1,049,972 36 Interfund Transfers Considered Operating Expenses 3,442,700 - 3,442,700 - 3,442,700 37 Other Operating Expenses 2,121,619 - 2,121,619 - 2,121,619 38 Total 85,952,991$ -$ 85,952,991$ -$ 85,952,991$ 6/8/2017; 4:44 PM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 29 of 32Table 6Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System Acquisition Estimated Consolidation Adjustments to Collier County Water-Sewer District SystemLineEstimated Adjusted CCWSD System Consolidation Adjustments Fiscal Year No. Description 2017 [1] Adjustments 2017 Basis and Comments Amount 2017 AmountOther Revenue Requirements and TransfersDebt ServiceOutstanding Senior Bonds39 Water and Sewer Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2013 1,472,924$ -$ 1,472,924$ -$ 1,472,924$ 40 Water and Sewer Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2015 2,842,523 - 2,842,523 - 2,842,523 41 Water and Sewer Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016 2,405,250 - 2,405,250 - 2,405,250 42 Developer Note 64,255 - 64,255 - 64,255 43 Total Senior Bonds 6,784,952$ -$ 6,784,952$ -$ 6,784,952$ Outstanding SRF (Subordinate) Loans44 Water and Sewer Refunding Revenue Note (Subordinate), Series 2016 3,536,798$ 7,611,356$ 11,148,154$ Adjustment to Reflect Full Year of Debt Service -$ 11,148,154$ 45 State Revolving Fund Loan - CS120597090 - - - Refinanced by Series 2016 Subordinate Revenue Note - - 46 State Revolving Fund Loan - CS120597100 731,656 (731,656) - Refinanced by Series 2016 Subordinate Revenue Note - - 47 State Revolving Fund Loan - WWG12059715L 01 - - - Refinanced by Series 2016 Subordinate Revenue Note - - 48 State Revolving Fund Loan - WWG12059715L 02 - - - Refinanced by Series 2016 Subordinate Revenue Note - - 49 State Revolving Fund Loan - WWG12059715L 03 - - - Refinanced by Series 2016 Subordinate Revenue Note - - 50 State Revolving Fund Loan - CS12059715P 173,295 (173,295) - Refinanced by Series 2016 Subordinate Revenue Note - - 51 State Revolving Fund Loan - CS12059717S - - - Refinanced by Series 2016 Subordinate Revenue Note - - 52 State Revolving Fund Loan - WW597180 133,247 (133,247) - Refinanced by Series 2016 Subordinate Revenue Note - - 53 State Revolving Fund Loan - DW1111 010 - - - Refinanced by Series 2016 Subordinate Revenue Note - - 54 State Revolving Fund Loan - DW1111 020 178,798 (178,798) - Refinanced by Series 2016 Subordinate Revenue Note - - 55 State Revolving Fund Loan - DW1111 030 - - - Refinanced by Series 2016 Subordinate Revenue Note - - 56 State Revolving Fund Loan - DW1111 040 1,555,162 (1,555,162) - Refinanced by Series 2016 Subordinate Revenue Note - - 57 Total SRF (Subordinate) Loans 6,308,956$ 4,839,198$ 11,148,154$ -$ 11,148,154$ 58 Total Senior and Subordinate Debt Service 13,093,908$ 4,839,198$ 17,933,106$ -$ 17,933,106$ 59 Less Growth-Related Debt Service Funded from Impact Fees 7,863,236 - 7,863,236 - 7,863,236 60 Total Senior and Subordinate Debt Service 5,230,672$ 4,839,198$ 10,069,870$ -$ 10,069,870$ 61 Transfer to Capital Accounts 26,721,192$ -$ 26,721,192$ -$ 26,721,192$ 62 Capital Funded from Rate Revenues 659,500 - 659,500 - 659,500 63 Total Other Revenue Requirements and Transfers 32,611,364$ 4,839,198$ 37,450,562$ -$ 37,450,562$ 64 Net Available for Other Purposes 16,392,373$ (4,839,198)$ 11,553,175$ -$ 11,553,175$ Footnotes:[1] Amounts shown reflect forecasted Fiscal Year 2017 financial operations based upon the adjusted Fiscal Year 2017 Budget as derived from recent projections.6/8/2017; 4:44 PM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 30 of 32Table 7Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System AcquisitionSummary of Consolidated OperationsFiscal Year 2017 - Golden Gate Rates Fiscal Year 2017 - CCWSD RatesOperating ResultsLine Prior to Acquisition Operating Results After Acquisition Operating Results After AcquisitionNo. Description CCWSD [1] CCWSD [1] Golden Gate [2] Totals CCWSD [1]Golden Gate [2] TotalsOperating Results1 Operating Revenues, Income, and Transfers from Other County Funds [3] 134,956,728$ 134,956,728$ 7,809,740$ 142,766,468$ 134,956,728$ 5,706,176$ 140,662,904$ 2 Operating Revenues Only 132,418,828 132,418,828 7,809,740 140,228,568 132,418,828 5,706,176 138,125,004 3 Total Operating Expenses 85,952,991 85,952,991 2,981,676 88,934,667 85,952,991 2,981,676 88,934,667 4 Estimated Transition Costs 0 76,332 0 76,332 76,332 0 76,332 5 Total Operating Expenses 85,952,991 86,029,323 2,981,676 89,010,999 86,029,323 2,981,676 89,010,999 6 Net Revenues Including Transfers from Other County Funds 49,003,737 48,927,405 4,828,064 53,755,470 48,927,405 2,724,500 51,651,905 Debt Service:7 CCWSD Outstanding Debt Service 17,933,106 17,933,106 - 17,933,106 17,933,106 - 17,933,106 8 Golden Gate Outstanding Debt Service - - 2,805,163 2,805,163 - 2,805,163 2,805,163 9 Total Debt Service 17,933,106 17,933,106 2,805,163 20,738,269 17,933,106 2,805,163 20,738,269 10 Less Growth-Related Debt Service Funded from Impact Fees 7,863,236 7,863,236 - 7,863,236 7,863,236 - 7,863,236 11 Net Debt Service 10,069,870 10,069,870 2,805,163 12,875,033 10,069,870 2,805,163 12,875,033 12 Amounts Available for Pay-As-You-Go Capital Needs 38,933,867 40,880,437 38,776,872 13 Change in Cash Flow1,946,570 (2,103,565) 14 Renewal and Replacement Fund Transfer 26,721,192 26,721,192 1,101,293 27,822,485 26,721,192 1,101,293 27,822,485 15 Capital Funded from Rate Revenues 659,500 659,500 - 659,500 659,500 - 659,500 16 Total Other Revenue Requirements and Transfers 76,384,429 37,450,562 3,906,456 84,184,025 37,450,562 3,906,456 78,030,325 17 Net Available for Other Purposes (27,380,692)$ 11,476,843$ 921,609$ (30,428,555)$ 11,476,843$ (1,181,956)$ (26,378,420)$ Debt CoverageAll-in Debt - Net Revenue Basis18 Net Revenues Including Transfers from Other County Funds 49,003,737$ 48,927,405$ 4,828,064$ 53,755,470$ 48,927,405$ 2,724,500$ 51,651,905$ 19 Less Transfers from Other County Funds [3] 2,537,900 2,537,900 - 2,537,900 2,537,900 - 2,537,900 20 Net Revenues 46,465,837$ 46,389,505$ 4,828,064$ 51,217,570$ 46,389,505$ 2,724,500$ 49,114,005$ 21 Total Senior and Subordinate Lien Debt 17,933,106 17,933,106 2,805,163 20,738,269 17,933,106 2,805,163 20,738,269 Debt Service Coverage22 Calculated 259% 259% 172% 247% 259% 97% 237%23 Minimum Target 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150%6/9/2017; 8:16 AM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 31 of 32Table 7Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System AcquisitionSummary of Consolidated OperationsFiscal Year 2017 - Golden Gate Rates Fiscal Year 2017 - CCWSD RatesOperating ResultsLine Prior to Acquisition Operating Results After Acquisition Operating Results After AcquisitionNo. Description CCWSD [1] CCWSD [1] Golden Gate [2] Totals CCWSD [1]Golden Gate [2] TotalsDebt Per Customer24 Debt Outstanding as of 9/30/2016 Per CAFR 180,387,268$ 180,387,268$ 39,871,983$ 220,259,251$ 25 Less Debt Service Reserve 14,252,119 14,252,119 631,782 14,883,901 26 Less Construction Fund Balance - - 344,387 344,387 27 Estimated Additional Debt - - - - 28 Total Debt Outstanding 166,135,149$ 166,135,149$ 38,895,814$ 205,030,963$ 29 Less Debt Service Reserve Cash - - - - 30 Net Debt Outstanding 166,135,149$ 166,135,149$ 38,895,814$ 205,030,963$ Estimated System Retail Accounts - FY 201731 Water Accounts 61,181 61,181 3,681 64,862 32 Wastewater Accounts 63,482 63,482 2,303 65,785 33 Combined Water and Wastewater Accounts 124,663 124,663 5,984 130,647 34 Debt Per Account 1,333$ 1,333$ 6,500$ 1,569$ 1,333$ 6,500$ 1,569$ Estimated System ERC's - FY 2017 [4]35 Water ERC's 88,715 88,715 4,856 93,571 36 Wastewater ERC's 90,758 90,758 3,320 94,079 37 Combined Water and Wastewater ERC's 179,473 179,473 8,177 187,650 38 Debt Per ERC 926$ 926$ 4,757$ 1,093$ 926$ 4,757$ 1,093$ Debt Outstanding to Net Plant39 Net Debt Outstanding (See Line 30) 166,135,149$ 166,135,149$ 38,895,814$ 205,030,963$ 40 Estimated Net Plant Fiscal Year 2017 [5] 948,909,793$ 948,909,793$ 27,966,515$ 976,876,308$ 41 Other- - - - 42 Total Estimated Net Plant 948,909,793$ 948,909,793$ 27,966,515$ 976,876,308$ 43 Debt Outstanding to Net Plant Ratio 17.51% 17.51% 139.08% 20.99% 17.51% 139.08% 20.99%44 Target Not-to-Exceed Percentage 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% 50.00%50.00% 50.00%6/9/2017; 8:16 AM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Page 32 of 32Table 7Collier County Water-Sewer DistrictFinancial Feasibility of FGUA-Golden Gate System AcquisitionSummary of Consolidated OperationsFiscal Year 2017 - Golden Gate Rates Fiscal Year 2017 - CCWSD RatesOperating ResultsLine Prior to Acquisition Operating Results After Acquisition Operating Results After AcquisitionNo. Description CCWSD [1] CCWSD [1] Golden Gate [2] Totals CCWSD [1]Golden Gate [2] TotalsOperating Ratio45 Calculated Operating Ratio 64.91% 64.97% 38.18% 63.48% 64.97% 52.25% 64.44%Free Cash as Percent of Depreciation46 Cash After Payment of Operating Expenses and Debt Service 28,532,731$ 28,456,399$ 2,022,902$ 30,479,301$ 28,456,399$ (80,663)$ 28,375,736$ 47 Annual Depreciation Expense 42,093,271 42,093,271 2,007,727 44,100,998 42,093,271 2,007,727 44,100,99848 Calculated Free Cash as Percent of Depreciation 67.78% 67.60% 100.76% 69.11% 67.60% -4.02% 64.34%Footnotes:[1] Amounts shown derived from Table 6.[2] Amounts shown derived from Table 5.[3] Includes transfers from Fund 470: Solid Waste Disposal and Fund 473: Mandatory Collection.[4] ERCs calculation includes multi-family units multiplied by the base charge equivalent factor.[5] Estimated Net Plant derived as follows:CCWSD Golden GateNet Plant InvestmentLand 17,794,983$ 500,040$ Utility PlantsBuildings 115,159,910$ Improvements Other Than Buildings 1,099,792,787 Equipment 32,060,441 Total Utility Plants 1,247,013,138$ 46,716,195$ Construction in Progress 50,568,695$ 385,883$ Capital Additions 140,094,254 2,922,508 Accumulated Depreciation (506,561,277) (22,558,111) Net Plant-in-Service 948,909,793$ 27,966,515$ Fiscal Year 20176/9/2017; 8:16 AM11.D.2 Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Exhibit 2 - FGUA - GG_CCWSD Fin Feas Rpt - PRMG - 06_09_2017 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to Infrastructure Security Survey Report FGUA Golden Gate Estate - Wastewater Treatment Facility 4931 32nd Ave SW. Naples, FL 34116 Assessment date 5/10/2017 11.D.3 Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Exhibit 3.1 - GG Waste Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Overview Facility Overview The Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) Wastewater Plant provides Wastewaters services to Golden Gate Estates (Collier County) for approximately 12,700 customers. The facility contains three buildings located within a fenced perimeter. It is bordered by a canal to the west and the residence of Golden Gate Estates. The complex site includes a pretreatment structure, an operations building, a storage building, fuel storage, chemical storage, clarifiers, a digester, a pump station and a deep injection well . General building sizes in square footage – 3,356 sqft. The facility occupies 15.53 acres. Figure 1 shows site map Facility Function/ Purpose The FGUA Waste Water Plant has the capacity to produce 1.5 MGD of carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD) waste water that is disposed of down a deep injection well. 11.D.3 Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Exhibit 3.1 - GG Waste Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Key Products and Services The FGUA Wastewater Plant provides wastewater treatment services to residence and business in the Golden Gate service area. Primary Customers/ users All of the facility’s wastewater is treated to CBOD standard Significant Assets or Areas (SAA) Overview List of SAAs SAA 1- Pre Treatment structure SAA 2- Plant Operations building SAA 3- Blower building SAA 4- Deep injection well SAA 5- Plant pump station SAA 6- Chemical Storage SAA 7- Clarifiers Assessed Areas Security Force Staffing- The complex has no security force. During normal operations, one to two plant operators are normally present with an additional three (3) maintenance technicians who roam from the Water Plant and the Waste Water plant. The plant is manned sixteen (16) hours a day. Training - Plant operators are trained on emergency procedures and an emergency plan is available inside the operations building. Post Guidance - No post security guidance exists Command and Control - The plant relies on cellular phones for communication. Security Management Security Manager- There is no security management team in charge Security Plan– There is a written emergency plan but it is not a specific security plan Security Communication- There is no written security communication plan 11.D.3 Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Exhibit 3.1 - GG Waste Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Sensitive Information – All sensitive information for the plant is stored inside the operations building. This information is protected by hollow metal door with a standard lock Background Checks - Background checks are conducted by U.S. Water Services Corp. at the time of hire and only for plant employees Information Sharing Threat Source - The organization does not have an information sharing mechanism or exchange information with any local, state or federal agencies for threat sourcing Security management- No security management exists Security Activity Background Proactive Measures – Two (2) protective measures have been put into practice: 5 foot high perimeter chain linked fence around the facility and an operational rolling gate with motor unit. Additional Proactive Measures– Standard locks on doors and bollards to protect some critical processes Physical Security Fences - 100% of the facility is enclosed with a 5’ high chain linked fence. Fence is constructed of standard aluminum. Fence is not anchored and 40% of the fence has barbed wire toppers. Gates – Two gates exist. One for entry and another for exit. Gates are 5’ high rolling vehicle gates that are approximately 15’ across. Entry Control - The gates are automated and controlled by a keypad entry system for the entry gate and an automatic loop activated exit system for the exit gate Parking/ Delivery/ Standoff - Vehicles can and are often placed within 400 feet of the facility. Parking and deliveries are controlled by employees and visitors are escorted by plant employees Barriers - Limited barriers are present in front of three of the Plant’s SAAs. Building Envelops - Plant SAAs are enclosed in CMU buildings with roll up doors, sliding windows and traditional swing hinge doors. Intrusion Detection System (IDS) CCTV – No CCTV camera system exists 11.D.3 Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Exhibit 3.1 - GG Waste Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Illumination - Site lighting exists around SAAs but not at the fence line. No waterside areas are illuminated Review Facility Overview- This report provides a summary of key findings at the FGUA Wastewater Plant (Golden Gate Estates). This report has not been integrated with the Gateway Dashboard therefore it does not visually depict the facility’s security and resilience posture. Site Address: 4931 32nd Ave SW. Naples, FL 34116 Site Representative: FGUA – Owner Mike Currier (321) 246 4642 mcurrier@govmserv.com U.S. Water Services Corporation – Operations Lina Quintero, P.E. (727) 858 2396 lquintero@uswatercorp.net 11.D.3 Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Exhibit 3.1 - GG Waste Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Facility Pictures: Headworks structure with the clarifiers 11.D.3 Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Exhibit 3.1 - GG Waste Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Close up view of Headworks structure Facility exterior VFD 11.D.3 Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Exhibit 3.1 - GG Waste Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Chemical storage on pad. (No secondary containment) 11.D.3 Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Exhibit 3.1 - GG Waste Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Infrastructure Security Survey Report FGUA Golden Gate Estate – Water Treatment Facility 4294 Maintenance rd. Naples, FL 34116 Assessment date 5/10/2017 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Exhibit 3.2 - GG Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Overview Facility Overview The Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) Water Plant provides water services to Golden Gate Estates (Collier County) for 3,628 households. The facility contains 4 buildings located within a fenced perimeter. It is bordered by the Golden Gate Estate Golf course and the complex site includes an operations building, a chemical storage building, a clarifier building, a lime building and a Reverse Osmosis (RO) Building. General building sizes in square footage – 4,560 sqft. The facility occupies 8.6 acres. Figure 1 shows site map 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Exhibit 3.2 - GG Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Facility Function/ Purpose The FGUA Water Plant provides water treatment for residence and business in the Golden Gate service area. Key Products and Services The facility has a capacity to produce 2.09 MGD (Million gallons of water per day). Its treatment system include a 1 MGD membrane softening system and a lime treatment system from which the produce a final blended product. Primary Customers/ users The primary customers are the residence and commercial properties of Golden Gate Estates in Collier County. The facility provides water services for 3,628 connections (Customers). Significant Assets or Areas (SAA) Overview List of SAAs SAA 1- Water plant Operations and Generator building SAA 2- Water plant membrane building SAA 3- Water plant Lime treatment building SAA 4- Raw Water Wells SAA 5- Chemical Storage and feed system area SAA 6- Process Mixer structure SAA 7- Clarifier Building Assessed Areas Security Force Staffing- The complex has no security force. During normal operations, one plant operator is normally present with an additional three (3) maintenance technicians who roam from the Water Plant and the Waste Water plant. The plant is manned sixteen (16) hours a day. Training - Plant operators are trained on emergency procedures and an emergency plan is available inside the operations building. Post Guidance - No post security guidance exists Command and Control - The plant relies on cellular phones for communication. 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Exhibit 3.2 - GG Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Security Management Security Manager - There is no security management team in charge Security Plan – There is a written emergency plan but it is not a specific security plan Security Communication - There is no written security communication plan Sensitive Information – All sensitive information for the plant is stored inside the operations building. This information is protected by hollow metal door with a standard lock Background Checks - Background checks are conducted by U.S. Water Services Corp. at the time of hire and only for plant employees Information Sharing Threat Source - The organization does not have an information sharing mechanism or exchange information with any local, state or federal agencies for threat sourcing Security management – The plant operator utilizes a CCTV camera system to monitor SAAs. Security Activity Background Proactive Measures - Four (4) protective measures have been put into practice: 5 foot high perimeter chain linked fence around the facility, an operational rolling gate with motor unit, a security camera system and 360 degree chain linked fences around source water wells Additional Proactive Measures – Standard locks on doors and bollards to protect critical processes Physical Security Fences - 100% of the facility is enclosed with a 5’ high chain linked fence. Fence is constructed of standard aluminum. Fence is not anchored and 60% of the fence has barbed wire toppers. Gates - One entry/ exit gate exists. Gate is a 5’ high rolling vehicle gate approximately 20’ across. Entry Control – The entry gate is automated and controlled by a keypad entry system Parking/ Delivery/ Standoff- Vehicles can and are often placed within 400 feet of the facility. Parking and deliveries are controlled by employees and visitors are escorted by plant employees 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Exhibit 3.2 - GG Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Barriers – Limited barriers are present in front of four of the Plant’s SAAs. There is no protection in front of the plant’s primary power feed system. Building Envelops – Plant SAAs are enclosed in CMU buildings with roll up doors, sliding windows and traditional swing hinge doors. Intrusion Detection System (IDS) – The facility has seven CCTV cameras focused on facility SAAs and the parking lot CCTV – a Pelco CCTV camera system with local storage exists. All cameras can be viewed inside the operations building Illumination – Site lighting exists around SAAs but not at the fence line. Review Facility Overview - This report provides a summary of key findings at the FGUA Water Plant (Golden Gate Estates). This report has not been integrated with the Gateway Dashboard therefore it does not visually depict the facility’s security and resilience posture. Site Address: 4294 Maintenance rd. Naples, FL 34116 Site Representative: FGUA – Owner Mike Currier (321) 246 4642 mcurrier@govmserv.com U.S. Water Services Corporation – Operations Lina Quintero, P.E. (727) 858 2396 lquintero@uswatercorp.net 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Exhibit 3.2 - GG Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Facility Pictures: Mixer system with chemical storage and clarifier building. 0.5 Million Gallon (MG) on-site Storage tank. There is an additional 1MG storage tank off-site 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Exhibit 3.2 - GG Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Operations and Generator building. SCADA is utilized to run pumps, wells and processes Typical Source Water 360 degree Well enclosure- There are eight (8) active wells on site. The Plants only power feed is located behind this enclosure. Power feed is unprotected. 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Exhibit 3.2 - GG Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Surveillance system sitting on top of local storage and next to SCADA operations hub Fuel is stored in double walled tank and sits inside a three foot high CMU containment basin. 11.D.4 Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Exhibit 3.2 - GG Water- Critical Infrastructure Survey Security Report 1 (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.5 Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Exhibit 4 - Integrated Water Management Strategy - ES Approved Strategy 12-8-15 16C4 (002) (3401 : FGUA Feasibility 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 11.D.6 Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Exhibit 5 - Special Act - ES downloaded from SIRE 12-29-15 9AM (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and Recommendation to 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2017- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA AND ACTING AS THE EX-OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT NOTIFYING THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY’S INTENT TO INITIATE THE PROCESS FOR TRANSFER OF THE GOLDEN GATE WATE R AND WASTEWATER UTILITY SYSTEM TO THE COUNTY; AND PROVIDING FOR APPLICABIL ITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. AUTHORITY. Pursuant to Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners (the "Board") of Collier County, Florida (the "County") has all the powers of local self- government including the power to acquire, own, improve, operate, maintain, and dispose of water and wastewater utility facilities. SECTION 2. COUNTY RIGHT TO ACQUIRE THE WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEM KNOWN AS THE GOLDEN GATE SYSTEM FROM THE FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY. County staff has concluded preliminary financial and technical due diligence relating to the potential transfer to the Collier County Water-Sewer District (“District”) of the water and wastewater systems serving the Golden Gate area (the “Golden Gate System”) which are currently owned by the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (“FGUA”). The FGUA is a utility authority created pursuant to section 163.01(7)(g)(1), Florida Statutes (the “Utility Authority Law”). The Utility Authority Law authorizes two or more counties, cities or special districts in Florida to create a utility authority by interlocal agreement for the purpose of acquiring, owning, managing and operating water and wastewater systems anywhere in Florida. The Utility Authority Law requires any utility authority created pursuant to its terms to notify and obtain consent from the governing body of any county, city or special district (the “Host Government”) before the utility authority may acquire a utility system which is located within the boundaries of the Host Government. By Resolution 99-169/Resolution CWS-99-1 issued March 9, 1999, the County, as the Host Government for the Golden Gate System, approved an interlocal agreement with the FGUA authorizing the FGUA to acquire the Golden Gate System (the “FGUA Interlocal Agreement”). Section 1 of the FGUA Interlocal Agreement reserves to the County the right to acquire all, but not less than all, of the Golden Gate System from the FGUA, specifically providing as follows: “The terms and provisions of such acquisition shall be established pursuant to a utility acquisition agreement between the Authority and the District, subject to the terms and conditions of the Interlocal Agreement and the Indenture. Notwithstanding the foregoing and unless otherwise agreed to by the Authority and the District, the purchase price for the Golden Gate Utility System shall be the amount required to repay the Bonds and any additional obligations of the Authority related with the Golden Gate Utility System. The District further agrees to negotiate with the Authority for the payment of a pro-rata share of any reasonable, verified Authority expenses at the time of acquisition by the District. The District shall also pay all verifiable expenses associated with the transfer of the Golden Gate Utility System by the Authority to the District.” SECTION 3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR COUNTY TO INITIATE PROCESS TO TRANSFER GOLDEN GATE SYSTEM TO THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT. The preliminary financial and technical due diligence conducted by County staff indicate 11.D.8 Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Exhibit 7 - Collier County Resolution Notifying FGUA of Initiation of Process for Tr... (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and 2 that it may be in the public interest for the County to exercise its rights under the FGUA Interlocal Agreement to acquire the Golden Gate System from the FGUA. Preliminary analyses indicate that the District’s service area surrounds the Golden Gate System, application of District rates to current customers of the Golden Gate System would result in a decrease of monthly water and wastewate r bills of nearly $40 a month, and there would be no material adverse impact on current customers of the District from the acquisition of the Golden Gate System. For these reasons and based upon the information provided in the preliminary financial and technical reports from the County’s consultants, County staff recommends that the Board authorize staff by this Resolution to i nitiate the process for final due diligence and negotiation of the terms of transfer of the Golden Gate System from the FGUA, notify the FGUA board of the County’s desire to initiate such process, and request that the FGUA provide County staff such documents and access to the Golden Gate System as will facilitate the final st ages of due diligence and place its management and contractors on notice of the County’s intent to initiate the transfer process. SECTION 4. NO DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC INTEREST FOR TRANSFER. This Resolution does not constitute a determination of public interest in the transfer of the Golden Gate System to the District. Florida law requires that after the conclusion of final due diligence by County staff, if the County determines that transfer of the Golden Gate System from the FGUA to the District has merit, public notice and a public hearing must be held for the County to consider certain factors identified in section 125.3401, Florida Statutes. After considering the required factors at such hearing, should the Board determine that acquisition of the Golden Gate System is in the public interest, an acquisition agreement would then be executed by the County and FGUA providing the terms of such transfer and transfer date. SECTION 5. APPROVAL OF NOTICE TO THE FGUA AND INITIATION OF FINAL DUE DILIGENCE ACTIVITIES AS EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER AND WASTEWATER DISTRICT. County staff is hereby authorized to take such steps as are necessary to notify the FGUA board of the contents of this Resolution, conclude final due diligence activities and negotiate terms relating to the potential acquisition of the Golden Gate System by the District, and request that notice be given to all current contractors and suppliers of the initiation of the acquisition process so that any FGUA contract or service termination obligations can be initiated. SECTION 6. APPLICABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be liberally construed to affect the purposes hereof and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. 11.D.8 Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Exhibit 7 - Collier County Resolution Notifying FGUA of Initiation of Process for Tr... (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and 3 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED at the meeting of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting as the Ex -Officio Board of the Collier County Wa ter-Sewer District on the _____ day of June, 2017. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND EX-OFFICIO BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT Penny Taylor, Chairman 11.D.8 Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Exhibit 7 - Collier County Resolution Notifying FGUA of Initiation of Process for Tr... (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Deputy Clerk Approved as to Form and Legality: _______________________________ Collier County Attorney 11.D.8 Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Exhibit 7 - Collier County Resolution Notifying FGUA of Initiation of Process for Tr... (3401 : FGUA Feasibility Assessments and This page is intentionally left blank TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. V ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................... XI 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1.1 1.1 PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................... 1.2 2.0 AVAILABLE INFORMATION..........................................................................................2.1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ...............................................................................................3.3 3.1 GENERAL ......................................................................................................................... 3.3 3.2 FGUA SERVICE AREA ..................................................................................................... 3.3 3.3 FGUA OWNED PROPERTY .............................................................................................. 3.7 3.4 POPULATIONS, WASTEWATER FLOWS, AND POTABLE WATER DEMAND .................. 3.9 3.5 WASTEWATER SYSTEM .................................................................................................. 3.13 3.5.1 Wastewater Collection and Conveyance System ............................... 3.13 3.5.2 Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facility ........................................ 3.13 3.5.3 Wastewater Treatment Facility Permit Requirements ........................... 3.14 3.5.4 Historical Flows ........................................................................................... 3.24 3.5.5 Wastewater Treatment Facility Field Investigations .............................. 3.33 3.5.6 Maintenance and Capital Projects ........................................................ 3.45 3.5.7 Wastewater Asset Evaluation Summary and Recommendations ...... 3.45 3.6 WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM ......................................................................................... 3.48 3.6.1 Water Supply .............................................................................................. 3.48 3.6.2 Water Treatment Facility ........................................................................... 3.51 3.6.3 Water Treatment Facility Permit Requirements ..................................... 3.52 3.6.4 Historical Flows ........................................................................................... 3.56 3.6.5 Water Treatment Facility Field Investigations......................................... 3.60 3.6.6 Water Treatment Facility Maintenance and Capital Projects ............ 3.71 3.6.7 Water Asset Evaluation Summary and Recommendations ................ 3.72 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ..............................................................................................4.1 4.1 PHASE 1 ........................................................................................................................... 4.1 4.2 PHASE 2 ........................................................................................................................... 4.6 4.3 PHASE 3 ......................................................................................................................... 4.11 5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ...................................................................................5.1 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure ES- 1 Proposed Potable Water Distribution Map ........................................................ viii Figure ES-2 Wastewater Collection Expansion Map ................................................................ ix Figure 1-1 FGUA Service Area Map ........................................................................................ 1.3 Figure 1-2 FGUA Service Area Map ........................................................................................ 1.4 Figure 1-3 FGUA Study Evaluation Area Map ........................................................................ 1.5 Figure 3-1 FGUA Service Area Quadrants .............................................................................. 3.4 Figure 3-2 Septic Tank Service Area ........................................................................................ 3.5 Figure 3-3 WWTF Site Aerial ....................................................................................................... 3.8 Figure 3-4 WTF Site Aerial .......................................................................................................... 3.8 Figure 3-5 Potable Water Booster Station Site Aerial ............................................................ 3.9 Figure 3-6 FGUA Service Area Land Use Map ..................................................................... 3.10 Figure 3-7 FGUA GGC Wastewater Collection & Conveyance System Map ................ 3.15 Figure 3-8 FGUA GGC Wastewater Treatment Facility Site Plan ....................................... 3.16 Figure 3-9 FGUA GGC WWTF Process Flow Diagram .......................................................... 3.17 Figure 3-10 Golden Gate WWTF Influent Flows - Monthly Average Daily Flow .............. 3.26 Figure 3-11 Golden Gate WWTF Influent Flows - Three Month Average Daily Flow ...... 3.27 Figure 3-12 Golden Gate WWTF Influent Flows - Annual Average Daily Flow ................ 3.28 Figure 3-13 Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Facility Influent Concentrations Max Month & Monthly Average CBOD5 (lb/day) 2015/2017.............................. 3.29 Figure 3-14 Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Facility Influent Concentrations Max Month & Monthly Average TSS (lb/day) 2015/2017 .................................... 3.30 Figure 3-15 Headworks Location at WWTF Site .................................................................... 3.33 Figure 3-16 Package Plant 1 Location at WWTF .................................................................. 3.34 Figure 3-17 Package Plant 2 Location at WWTF .................................................................. 3.36 Figure 3-18 Digester Location at WWTF ................................................................................ 3.37 Figure 3-19 RAS / WAS Pumps Location at WWTF ............................................................... 3.38 Figure 3-20 Injection Well Pump Station Location at WWTF ............................................... 3.39 Figure 3-21 Accessory Structures Locations at WWTF ......................................................... 3.40 Figure 3-22 Deep Injection and Monitoring Wells Locations ............................................. 3.42 Figure 3-23 Percolation Ponds Location at WWTF ............................................................... 3.44 Figure 3-24 FGUA GGC Water Distribution System Map .................................................... 3.49 Figure 3-25 Water Treatment Facility Site Plan ..................................................................... 3.53 Figure 3-26 Water Treatment Facility Process Flow Diagram ............................................. 3.54 Figure 3-27 Lime Softening Plant Location at WTF Site ....................................................... 3.61 Figure 3-28 Ground Storage Tank Location ......................................................................... 3.63 Figure 3-29 RO Membrane Plant Location at WTF Site ....................................................... 3.64 Figure 3-30 Location of the Decommissioned Lime Softening Plant ................................ 3.65 Figure 3-31 Location of the Sludge Holding Tanks .............................................................. 3.66 Figure 3-32 High Service Pumps Location ............................................................................ 3.67 Figure 3-33 Accessory Structures Locations at WTF site ...................................................... 3.68 Figure 3-34 Chemical Storage and Injection Points Locations ......................................... 3.70 Figure 3-35 Wells Locations ..................................................................................................... 3.71 Figure 4-1 Water Distribution Improvements .......................................................................... 4.3 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE iii Figure 4-2 Phase 2 Water Distribution Improvements ........................................................... 4.8 Figure 4-3 Water Distribution Improvements .......................................................................... 4.1 LIST OF TABLES Table ES-1 Phase I Implementation Plan Projects and Potential Costs .............................. vii Table ES-2 Implementation Plan Summary ............................................................................... x Table 2-1 List of Available Information ................................................................................... 2.1 Table 2-2 Site Visits Summary ................................................................................................... 2.2 Table 3-1 FGUA Owned Parcels ............................................................................................. 3.7 Table 3-2 Parcel Count .......................................................................................................... 3.11 Table 3-3 Population Estimates ............................................................................................. 3.11 Table 3-4 Flows and Demand Estimates .............................................................................. 3.12 Table 3-5 Wastewater Conveyance System Quantities ................................................... 3.13 Table 3-6 Permit Effluent Limitations Reuse and Land Application System Rapid Infiltration Basins (R-001) ........................................................................................... 3.18 Table 3-7 Permit Effluent Limitations Deep Injection Well (U-001) .................................... 3.19 Table 3-8 Ground Water Quality Monitoring Wells ............................................................. 3.19 Table 3-9 Ground Water Monitoring Parameters ............................................................... 3.19 Table 3-10 Injection Well IW-1 ............................................................................................... 3.22 Table 3-11 Monitoring Well DZMW-1 ................................................................................... 3.22 Table 3-12 Administration Order ........................................................................................... 3.23 Table 3-13 Influent Flows ........................................................................................................ 3.24 Table 3-14 Influent Loadings, FLW-01 (MGD) ....................................................................... 3.25 Table 3-15 Effluent Flows ......................................................................................................... 3.31 Table 3-16 Effluent Loadings .................................................................................................. 3.32 Table 3-17 Wastewater Treatment Facilities Conditions Assessment ............................. 3.46 Table 3-18 Water Distribution System ................................................................................... 3.50 Table 3-19 Permitted Aquifer Use Allocations ...................................................................... 3.52 Table 3-20 Production Wells Summary ................................................................................. 3.55 Table 3-21 Monitoring Wells Summary ................................................................................. 3.56 Table 3-22 2015 and 2016 Raw Water and Treated Water Summary ............................. 3.56 Table 3-23 2015 and 2016 Summary of Total Water Usage and Accounted for (Gallons) ..................................................................................................................... 3.58 Table 3-24 2015 and 2016 Summary of Unbilled Water Usage (Gallons) ........................ 3.59 Table 3-25 Water Treatment Facility Condition Assessment ............................................ 3.74 Table 4-1 Phase I Proposed Implementation Costs .............................................................. 4.5 Table 4-2 Phase I Proposed Implementation Schedule ....................................................... 4.6 Table 4-3 Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost ...................................................................... 4.9 Table 4-4 Phase II Implantation Proposed Schedule .......................................................... 4.10 Table 4-5 Phase 3 Proposed Implementation Costs ........................................................... 4.12 Table 5-1 Implementation Plan Summary .............................................................................. 5.2 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE iv LIST OF PHOTOS Photo 3-1 Headworks at WWTF Site ....................................................................................... 3.34 Photo 3-2 Interior of Plant 1 Tank ........................................................................................... 3.35 Photo 3-3 Exterior of Plant 1 Tank .......................................................................................... 3.35 Photo 3-4 Package Plant 2 Tank Exterior .............................................................................. 3.36 Photo 3-5 Digester Tank at WWTF .......................................................................................... 3.37 Photo 3-6 RAS / WAS Pumps................................................................................................... 3.38 Photo 3-7 Effluent Pumps ........................................................................................................ 3.39 Photo 3-8 Accessory Building Storage Area ........................................................................ 3.40 Photo 3-9 Fuel Storage Tank................................................................................................... 3.41 Photo 3-10 Administration Building ........................................................................................ 3.41 Photo 3-11 Direct Injection Well ............................................................................................. 3.43 Photo 3-12 Monitoring Wells ................................................................................................... 3.43 Photo 3-13 Percolation Pond ................................................................................................. 3.44 Photo 3-14 Existing Lift Station ................................................................................................ 3.45 Photo 3-15 6-inch Raw Water Interconnection ................................................................... 3.50 Photo 3-16 WTF CitectSCADA System ................................................................................... 3.52 Photo 3-17: Lime softening Steel tanks ................................................................................. 3.62 Photo 3-18: Lime Softening Backwash .................................................................................. 3.62 Photo 3-19 Water Ground Storage Tank .............................................................................. 3.63 Photo 3-20 RO system ............................................................................................................. 3.64 Photo 3-21 Fouled RO Cartridge Filters ................................................................................. 3.65 Photo 3-22 Decommissioned Plant ....................................................................................... 3.66 Photo 3-23 Lime Sludge Holding Tanks ................................................................................. 3.67 Photo 3-24 High service Pumps .............................................................................................. 3.68 Photo 3-25 Accessory Building ............................................................................................... 3.69 Photo 3-26 Storage Building ................................................................................................... 3.69 Photo 3-27 Injection Points ..................................................................................................... 3.70 Photo 3-28 Typical Well Installation at WTF Site ................................................................... 3.71 LIST OF APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................... A.1 Interlocal agreement ................................................................................................................ A.1 ............................................................................................................................ B.1 FGUA FDEP WASTEWATER PERMIT ............................................................................................ B.1 FGUA WTF PERMIT ...................................................................................................................... B.1 FGUA SFWMD Water Use Permit .............................................................................................. B.1 ........................................................................................................................... C.1 FGUA FY 2017-2021 ................................................................................................................... C.1 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE v Executive Summary INTRODUCTION On March 1, 1999, an Interlocal Agreement Relating to the Acquisition of the Golden Gate Utility System was executed between FGUA and the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD). Ownership transfer is viewed as a cooperative and beneficial venture for both entities, as well as residents served by the utility. This opportunity will provide the following benefits: (1) Provide safe and reliable drinking water and wastewater service delivery; (2) provide water and wastewater to residents with rate stability; (3) make a long-term investment improving viability in the utility system, and (4) provide a long-term strategy to address environmental impacts. Stantec was engaged by Collier County Public Utilities staff to evaluate the technical feasibility of Collier County’s acquisition of FGUA assets within the Golden Gate service area and identify/evaluate opportunities to make the improvements described above. Stantec conducted three (3) site visits at the Golden Gate Wastewater and Water Treatment Facilities to gather information and meetings with the facilities operations staff. Additionally, available reports, drawings, permits, and operational data were compiled and reviewed for preparation of this feasibility study. WASTEWATER ASSET EVALUATION SUMMARY AND GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS FGUA currently provides wastewater treatment to approximately 2,300 customers which results in approximately 1.1 MGD of wastewater treated annually. This is approximately 73% of the permitted annual average treatment capacity. FGUA currently does not have any plans to expand the existing customer base. Limited investigations were performed on the wastewater collection and conveyance system. It is expected that pump station rehabilitations will be required for long term use. The County may wish to refurbish pump stations over time, which will allow the stations to meet the Collier County standards for pump stations and SCADA systems. Based on the age of the system and difficulties associated with repairing the linear infrastructure due to the complications of rock excavation, it is recommended that an asset management program for sewers, manholes, force mains, and air release valves be developed that identifies infrastructure to be rehabilitated and or replaced based on age, criticality, and known deficiencies. In general, the WWTF and collection system are in good condition and limited improvements are needed to maintain wastewater service to existing customers. It is recommended that an evaluation of the collection and conveyance system be performed to prioritize the use of the funds for collection system improvements. Based on the limited observations, it is likely that the budgeted $200,000 - $300,000 annually on collection system improvements is adequate for long term operation. WATER ASSET EVALUATION SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE vi FGUA currently provides potable water service to approximately 3,640 customers. In 2015 and 2016, FGUA provided 412.3 MG of potable water to its customers which is equivalent to 1.1 MGD of potable water delivered. The withdrawal of raw water for the corresponding year and was 630 MG, which is approximately 70% of the permitted allocation rate of 908 MG. The overall potable water system efficiency is approximately 65%. Typically, potable water treatment recovery rates for brackish water with an RO plant is 75%-80% and the treatment recovery for a freshwater plant is approximately 90%. Based on the review of well pumpage data and water production data, the WTF has an inefficient recovery rate which is then compounded by water main breaks and unaccounted losses within the system. The existing lime softening facility is in poor condition and further evaluation of the structural integrity of the existing tankage is required. As mentioned, Stantec staff did not investigate the tanks due to safety concerns. Additionally, staff has indicated that the treatment performance of the lime softening plant is limited as well. The lime softening plant has a capacity to treat 500 GPM, however staff indicated that treatment beyond 300 GPM is not feasible. A preliminary investigation of the potable water distribution system was performed. In general discussions with staff have indicated that significant resources are required to manage and repair water line breaks. The service area has significant highly permeable rock which makes identifying water main break locations difficult. Due to the frequency of breaks, the quality of the pipe bedding and fill material are in question. A review of the unaccounted water loss data indicates that water lost due to water main breaks was 182,046 gallons and 327,673 gallons for 2015 and 2016 respectively. Additionally, the unaccounted losses for the water system were 17% and 15% for 2015 and 2016 respectively. Unaccounted losses over 10% are considered excessive and SFWMD requires a corrective action plan when unaccounted losses are over 10%. Fire flow testing is performed by the fire department prior to new development connecting to the existing water distribution system. According to staff, fire flow requirements are currently being met. However, there does not appear to be an adequate number of hydrants. In accordance with Collier County standards the maximum distance is 500-ft between hydrants in 1 and 2 family areas with building less than 5,000-sf and 300-ft max distance between hydrants in all other areas. In general, the water treatment and distribution system are considered to be in poor condition and does not appear to be capable of providing potable water to an expanded service area due to potential limitations with the water supply, water treatment capacity, and water distribution system. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN An implementation plan was developed to primarily address improvements to provide reliable potable water and improved fire protection to existing customers, considering that the potable water system is in poor condition and improvements are needed to maintain potable water service to existing customers. While the existing wastewater system is in good condition, the facility is currently operating at approximately 73% capacity on an annual average basis. Should the County choose to expand TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE vii wastewater service, a limited number of customers could be served by the existing facility. It is estimated that approximately 1,000 residential units could be served with the remaining capacity. Due to the permitted capacity limitations, for any expansion of the service area, a capacity analysis report would be required to evaluate the ability to expand the existing plant and/or to connect to the County wastewater infrastructure. To provide wastewater service to the Golden Gate service area in its entirety, the County will need to consider expanding the existing treatment facility, upgrading major force mains, and/or interconnecting to Collier County wastewater facilities. PHASE 1 As part of the Phase 1 implementation plan, a series of improvement projects and technical evaluations are recommended. The Phase 1 improvements projects and technical evaluations are listed on Table ES-3. Table ES-1 Phase I Implementation Plan Projects and Potential Costs Project Preliminary Engineering Budget Estimate Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate A. Connect to Collier County potable water supply $467,000 $4,674,000 B. Minor Upgrades to WWTF - $180,000 C. Evaluate generator capacity $10,000 - D. Evaluate potable water production well performance $45,000 - E. Perform detailed WTF evaluation $75,000 - F. Perform wastewater collection system rehabilitation td $100,000 - G. Perform water distribution system rehabilitation study $100,000 - Subtotal $797,000 $4,854,000 Total $5,651,000 PHASE 2 Currently most residences within the primary service area are on private, shallow aquifer wells for drinking water. Due to the proximity and age of many of the septic systems currently in use in Golden Gate City, the potential for contamination of shallow drinking water wells may occur. The Phase 2 improvements are being driven by a desire to drastically reduce the potential for drinking water contamination by providing clean, safe, potable drinking water to greater than 90% of all residences in the primary service area within the next 10 years. Additionally, Collier County would have an established goal of providing 100% Fire Hydrant coverage within this same area to provide protection if fires similar to the 30th Avenue fire that occurred earlier this year were to threaten Golden Gate City in the future. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE viii Figure ES-1 illustrates the proposed Phase 2 potable water system expansion, which includes expanding the potable water system to the greater Golden Gate City. Figure ES- 1 Proposed Potable Water Distribution Map The budgetary cost estimates for Phase 2 improvements is $21,212,250.00. PHASE 3 Septic tank systems have the potential for contamination of both groundwater and surface water that can occur from septic systems that are in disrepair or failing. The existing septic tank areas were evaluated to determine logical areas to expand the wastewater collection system. The following criteria was utilized to identify initial service expansion areas: • Areas should be located adjacent or near the existing WWTF, should the County choose to continue to operate and/or expand the WWTF. • Areas should be located near or adjacent to Santa Barbara Boulevard should the County choose to connect to the County’s infrastructure. • Areas near or adjacent to canal systems should be considered, as the septic tanks may pose a greater threat of contamination to groundwater or surface water in these areas. Figure ES-2 illustrates the proposed three (3) septic tank replacement program areas to be considered by the County. There are 958 residential parcels that could be served by the existing TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE ix WWTF and/or through an interconnection to the County’s existing wastewater infrastructure. Each septic tank replacement area will require the installation of gravity sewers, pump stations, and force mains to convey flows to the WWTF and/or the County’s system. Figure ES-2 Wastewater Collection Expansion Map The budgetary cost estimates for each of the septic tank areas was estimated to be $26,348,000. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS In general, the WWTF and collection system are in good condition and limited improvements are needed to maintain wastewater service to existing customers. Based on the review of raw water well pumpage data and water production data, the WTF has an inefficient recovery rate which is then compounded by water main breaks and unaccounted losses within the system. Additionally, the existing lime softening facility is in poor condition and further evaluation of the structural integrity of the existing tankage is required. A three -phased implementation plan was developed as follows: Phase 1 – Improvements recommended to address current and near term deficiencies; Phase 2 - Future improvements to increase reliable potable water service and fire protection to houses currently on wells to be implemented within 10 year TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE x Phase 3 - long term improvements to provide increased wastewater service to houses currently on wells and septic tanks that can be implemented between 10 years and 20 years from now. A summary of the preliminary cost estimates for each phase is provided below in Table ES-4: Table ES-2 Implementation Plan Summary Phase Population Served - Water Population Served Wastewater Budgetary Cost of Improvements and Evaluations 1 12,404 12,404 $5,651,000 2 21,285 12,404 $21,212,250 3 21,285 15,000 $26,348,000 Total $53,211,250 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE xi Abbreviations AADF: Annual Average Daily Flow AC: Asbestos Cement CCWSD: Collier County Water-Sewer District CIP: Capital Improvements Plan DIW: Deep Injection Well DO: Dissolved Oxygen FDEP: Florida Department of Environmental Protection FGUA: Florida Governmental Utility Authority GIS: Geographic Information System GPM: Gallons per Minute GSG: Government Services Group kW: Kilowatt LF: Linear Foot MADF: Monthly Average Daily Flow MCC: Motor Control Center MDF: Max Daily Flow MGD: Millions of Gallons per Day MWC: Compliance Monitoring Well NGVD: National Geodetic Vertical Datum PIT: Pressure Indicating Transmitter PSI: Pounds per Square Inch PVC: Polyvinyl Chloride RAS: Recycle Activated Sludge RIB: Rapid Infiltration Basin ROW: Right of Way SCADA: Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition SFWMD: South Florida Water Management District TDS: Total Dissolved Solids TMADF: Three-Month Average Daily Flow UIW: Underground Injection Well USWSC: U.S. Water Services Corporation VC: Vitrified Clay WAS: Waste Activated Sludge WRF: Water Reclamation Facility WTF: Water Treatment Facility WUP: Water Use Permits WWTF: Wastewater Treatment Facility This page is intentionally left blank TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 1.1 1.0 INTRODUCTION Water and wastewater services are provided within the Golden Gate area of Collier County by the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA). On March 1, 1999, an Interlocal Agreement, between FGUA and the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD) was executed as authorized under Part 1, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. Figure 1-1 illustrates the CCSWD and FGUA service area location while Figure 1-2 contains the FGUA Service Boundary Map. The majority of residents within the FGUA service area are served by private wells and septic tanks. Residences are in close proximity to each other. The relative proximity of the existing wells and septic systems may pose a risk of contamination of individual water wells. Private water wells and septic tanks have a limited lifecycle, and there is wide disparity in the level of maintenance by various property owners to extend the life and functionality of the tanks. The Collier County Board of County Commission (BOCC) has asked the Collier County Utilities Department staff to evaluate the technical and financial feasibility of acquiring all assets and inventory of the FGUA and of providing water and wastewater services within the Golden Gate service area, ultimately, placing the utility service under the operation of Collier County Utilities Department. FGUA is a public utility, and the FGUA Board supports acquisition of the system by the CCWSD. Ownership transfer is viewed as a cooperative and beneficial venture for both entities, as well as residents served by the utility. The terms for acquiring FGUA are provided through the Interlocal Agreement (Appendix A). Collier County Public Utilities staff is currently working with rate consultants to evaluate the financial feasibility of acquiring the FGUA facilities, and they are currently evaluating utility rates, expenses, and debt services. Should the County acquire the FGUA utility system, an opportunity exists to make improvements that will address safe and reliable drinking water and wastewater service delivery, provide rate stability to residents, make a long-term investment improving viability in the utility system, and provide a long-term strategy to address environmental impacts. To that end, Collier County Public Utilities staff has requested that Stantec evaluate the technical feasibility associated with acquiring FGUA assets and inventory within the FGUA Golden Gate service area and evaluate the long-term feasibility to provide safe, reliable potable drinking water and wastewater services within the FGUA service area. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 1.2 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to evaluate the technical feasibility of Collier County’s acquisition of FGUA assets within the Golden Gate service area, and identify/evaluate opportunities to: • Address safe and reliable drinking water and wastewater service delivery; • Provide water to residents at best value rates; • Make a long-term investment improving viability in the utility system; and • Provide a long-term strategy to address environmental impacts. The FGUA Golden Gate Service Area includes Estates zoned lands lying west of Santa Barbara Boulevard and East of I-75. This area is not included in the assessment of providing coverage in the primary service area which is commonly described as ‘Golden Gate City’. Figure 1-3 illustrates the areas evaluated as part of this technical feasibility study. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 tel 239.649.4040 fax 239.263.6449 Figure 1-1 CCWSD & FGUA Service Area Location Map June 2017 0 9,000 18,000 Feet ($$¯\\US1226-F01\U:\177311018\gis\mxd\Figure1-1_FGUA_Vicinity_20170608_103504.mxd Revised: 2017-06-08 By: cbernerDisclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. Collier County Water Sewer Service Area FGUA Service Area Prepared by:C.J.B. 06/08/17 §¨¦SANTA BARBARA BLVD") GREEN BLVD HUNTER BLVDSUNSHINE BLVDTROPICANA BLVDSU N S E T R D §¨¦ ")GOLDEN GATE PKWYStantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 tel 239.649.4040 fax 239.263.6449 Figure 1-2 FGUA Service Area Map June 2017 0 650 1,300 Feet ($$¯\\US1226-F01\U:\177311018\gis\mxd\Figure1-2_FGUA_Location_20170608_103504.mxd Revised: 2017-06-08 By: cbernerDisclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. L E G E N D FGUA Service Area Prepared by:C.J.B. 06/08/17 §¨¦SANTA BARBARA BLVD") GREEN BLVD HUNTER BLVDSUNSHINE BLVDTROPICANA BLVDSUN S E T R D §¨¦ ")GOLDEN GATE PKWYStantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 tel 239.649.4040 fax 239.263.6449 Figure 1-3 FGUA Study Evaluation Area Map June 2017 0 650 1,300 Feet ($$¯\\US1226-F01\U:\177311018\gis\mxd\Figure1-3_FGUA_StudyArea_20170608_103504.mxd Revised: 2017-06-09 By: cbernerDisclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. L E G E N D FGUA Service Area Study Evaluation Area Prepared by:C.J.B. 06/09/17 Golden Gate Canal Golden Gate Canal TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 2.1 2.0 AVAILABLE INFORMATION As part of this feasibility study preparation available, reports, drawings, permits, and operational data were compiled and reviewed. A list of documents reviewed for the development of this report is shown on Table 2-1 below, indicating source of the information. Table 2-1 List of Available Information Document Name Date Source Interlocal Agreement between FGUA and CCWSD relating to the Acquisition of the Golden Gate Utility System Collier County FGUA Golden Gate Water & Wastewater Service Area Map 2011 Collier County Statewide in Florida - New Meter Replacement Program 2016 FGUA Golden Gate's water now most expensive in Southwest Florida 2010 Naplesnews.com 2016_FGUA_annual_drinking_water_report 2016 FGUA GGWTP_summary 2016 Carollo wellfieldprotectionzonemap 2010 CCPA wells_and_water_plants_20170515 2017 FDEP & FGS GG Planning Community PUD, Zoning Map 2016 CCPA 2009_CC_fire_hydrant_reg 2009 CCFP Collier County 10-yr Water Supply Facilities Work Plan 2007 colliergov.net WUP_080902-11_Permit_589552 2010 SFWMD 2015 Golden Gate Unaccounted for Water Loss Report 2015 SFWMD 2016 Golden Gate Unaccounted for Water Loss Report 2016 SFWMD FY2015 Adopted Budget 2015 FGUA FY2016 Budget Presentation 2016 FGUA FY2016CollierCountyRates 2016 CCUD FY2016GoldenGateRates 2016 FGUA RateComparison 2016 FGUA/CCUD FGUA's Race to a Comprehensive Asset Mngmt. Program 2017 FGUA GoldenGateLongTermWaterSupplyPlan 2007 FGUA CC Design Criteria - CCUD Golden Gate FLA142140 009_substantial_mod_2010 05-10 FDEP Jun16__GoldenGate-Permit with Attachments - Adminstrative Order 15-20 FDEP Substantial Mod App 2008 FDEP UIC Permit 2012-2017 12-17 FDEP Updated CAR_2011 11-15 FDEP WWTP_permit_app_2010 2010 FDEP 2015_FDEP_GGWWTP_Application 2015 FDEP 2015_FDEP_GGWWTP_Compliance_Inspection_rpt 2015 FDEP CAPR 5110117 FGUA (Golden Gate) ICL (June 2016) 2016 FDEP Collier_general_septic_map 2016 CC DOH 2015_FGUA_GGWWTP_variance_petition 2015 FGUA 298_special_districts_map 2015 SFWMD 20170530_Soil_Report 2017 NRCS GG_FDEP_Contamination_Map_20170512 2017 FDEP 34116 Zip Code (Golden Gate, FL) Detailed Profile 2015 City-Data.com Briefing_jgv_20170519_SCN 2017 Stantec TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 2.2 Table 2-1 List of Available Information Document Name Date Source CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FY 2017 - FY 2021 PROJECT REQUEST FORM 2016 Collier County Draft Meeting Minutes re Discussion with BOCC to consider the level of support for acquiring utility services provided by FGUA providing water and wastewater services within the Golden Gate Service Area Collier County FGUA Golden Gate WWTP Expansion Hydraulic Flow Plan FGUA / US Water FGUA Golden Gate WWTP Expansiont Site Plan FGUA / US Water FGUA Golden Gate WWTP ExpansionProcess flow Diagram FGUA / US Water FGUA Comprehensive Annual Report (CAFR) FY 2012 FGUA FGUA Comprehensive Annual Report (CAFR) FY 2013 FGUA FGUA Comprehensive Annual Report (CAFR) FY 2015 FGUA FGUA Comprehensive Annual Report (CAFR) FY 2016 FGUA Additionally, the Stantec project team conducted three site visits to the FGUA service area, water treatment facility and the wastewater treatment facility. A brief description of the site visits is provided on Table 2-2 below. Table 2-2 Site Visits Summary Date Team Description May 25, 2017 Kelly Blake and Gabriel Vega Information gathering meetings located at Golden Gate Wastewater and Water Treatment Facilities. Met with plant operators, and staff to discuss various topics pertaining to the Golden Gate Wastewater and Water Treatment Systems. Topics discussed include utility history, utility standing, service areas, FGUA and US Water division of responsibilities and staffing, as well as technical information regarding permitting, conditions, processes, operations, treatment quantities, treatment qualities, construction efforts, maintenance, source wells, injection wells, and general infrastructure. May 31, 2017 Alex Dunko and Larry Alewine A follow-up visit was conducted to document existing utility conditions and engage in supplemental data gathering. Field investigations extended to the Booster Pump Station and many of the existing lift stations located throughout the FGUA service area. June 5, 2017 Alex Dunko A follow-up visit was conducted to gather additional information about the Water Treatment Facility, due to the complexity of the operations and lack of up-to-date record drawing data available. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.3 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 GENERAL The FGUA water and wastewater system in Golden Gate, Florida is managed and operated by two separate entities. Government Services Group, Inc. (GSG) oversees the administrative, regulatory, contractual, and financial aspects of the system. This includes developing, funding and executing the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). GSG subcontracts the operation of the system to U.S. Water Services Corporation (USWSC). USWSC supplies licensed operators to operate both the Water Treatment and Wastewater Treatment Facility. USWSC also maintains the water distribution system and collection and conveyance wastewater system, which includes general system maintenance as well as emergency on-call services for spills and line breaks. Typically, USWSC will evaluate the system on a yearly basis and submit a CIP to GSG for approval. GSG will review the CIP as submitted and will approve certain items at their discretion. USWSC will then work directly with a contractor to execute the work. Engineering sub-consultants are sometimes retained for these projects. For any maintenance work identified by GSG or USWSC that is not critical, USWSC is responsible for paying a deductible as part of the maintenance/repair cost. Emergency repairs are fully covered by GSG. As GSG bears full fiscal responsibility for emergency repairs, GSG staff have historically had a financial incentive to be vigilant in performing regular maintenance of their assets and identifying potential future issues. 3.2 FGUA SERVICE AREA The FGUA service area is 2,700 acres and generally bounded by I-75 to the west, access roads and 15th Avenue SW to the North, Collier Boulevard to the east and the Golden Gate canal to the south. The western portion of the FGUA service area is sub-divided as large parcel Estate lots that are on well water and possess septic systems. Due to the low density of housing and impracticality of bringing potable water and sanitary sewer to these areas, these areas will not be evaluated as part of this report. The majority of the FGUA boundary area actively serviced by FGUA lies within Golden Gate City (GGC) proper which features high density residential and commercial development. The FGUA service area can be further broken down into four separate quadrants generally, in line with the Township, Range and Section. Figure 3-1 provides the location of the FGUA boundary area and the four quadrants, within the FGUA service area. An evaluation of the properties and populations currently served by FGUA was performed utilizing parcel information from the Property Appraiser. Approximate areas were delineated to identify areas currently on septic systems. For the purpose of this high-level evaluation of the FGUA service area, it was assumed that the septic tank areas also represent portions of the FGUA service area that do not have potable water service provided by FGUA. Figure 3-2 provides an approximate delineation of the areas currently on septic and are not served by FGUA. §¨¦SANTA BARBARA BLVD") GREEN BLVD HUNTER BLVDSUNSHINE BLVDTROPICANA BLVDSUN S E T R D §¨¦ ")GOLDEN GATE PKWYStantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 tel 239.649.4040 fax 239.263.6449 Figure 3-1 FGUA Service Area Quadrants Map June 2017 0 650 1,300 Feet ($$¯\\US1226-F01\U:\177311018\gis\mxd\Figure3-1_FGUA_Quadrant_20170608_103504.mxd Revised: 2017-06-08 By: cbernerDisclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. L E G E N D FGUA Service Area Quadrant Boundary Prepared by:C.J.B. 06/08/17 Quadrant 1 Quadrant 2Quadrant 3 Quadrant 4 Golden Gate Canal Golden Gate Canal [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú[Ú[Ú[Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú §¨¦SANTA BARBARA BLVD") GREEN BLVD HUNTER BLVDSUNSHINE BLVDTROPICANA BLVDSU N S E T R D §¨¦ ")GOLDEN GATE PKWYStantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 tel 239.649.4040 fax 239.263.6449 Figure 3-2 FGUA Septic Tank Area Map June 2017 0 650 1,300 Feet ($$¯\\US1226-F01\U:\177311018\gis\mxd\Figure3-2_FGUA_SepticArea_20170608_103504.mxd Revised: 2017-06-08 By: cbernerDisclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. L E G E N D [Ú Pump Station [Ú Deep Injection Well Sanitary Force Main Sanitary Gravity Main FGUA Service Area Septic Tank Area Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant Prepared by:C.J.B. 06/08/17 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.6 Northeast Quadrant (Quadrant 1) The majority of the water and wastewater infrastructure is located within the northeast quadrant. The infrastructure within this area is older than the rest of the system, with portions originally constructed in the 1960s. Much of the sanitary system is composed of vitrified clay (VC) piping and water mains are primarily of asbestos cement (AC) piping. Both types of piping tend to become brittle over time and repetitive vibration within the pipes can lead to breaks. This can lead to a health and safety issue with regards to AC pipe, as pipe breaks have the potential to contaminate drinking water, and the areas immediately surrounding the breaks with asbestos fibers. Conversations with USWSC staff indicated that water main breaks are a relatively common occurrence in this area. Each of the remaining quadrants have significantly less infrastructure. Southeast Quadrant (Quadrant 2) The southeast quadrant includes the FGUA WTF site and a small portion of the water distribution system. The majority of the land within the southeast quadrant is the previous Golden Gate Country Club. A small neighborhood is served by a gravity system which discharges to a FGUA pump station that manifolds into the pressurized forced main. Southwest Quadrant (Quadrant 3) The southwest quadrant includes a portion of Golden Gate Parkway which is the location of multiple commercial properties. This quadrant therefore has a water distribution systems primarily serving the businesses. This quadrant also includes the WWTF site, however the wastewater collection system is very minor and is limited to a few force mains and a small gravity system within a commercial shopping center. Northwest Quadrant (Quadrant 4) This quadrant has the least amount of infrastructure in regard to water and wastewater. This area is primarily residential, and the majority of infrastructure is located within the northern part of the quadrant for apartment housing along Green Blvd. Additional Customers FGUA also provides water and wastewater service to the David Lawrence Center outside of Golden Gate City and located west of the intersection of Santa Barbara Blvd and Golden Gate Pkwy. Geological Existing Conditions Both GSG and USWSC staff indicated that GGC is underlain by a large layer of caprock and that a large portion of the utility system was not originally installed with proper pipe bedding. The combination of these two issues has created a significant issue with water main breaks, as the vibration of the brittle AC piping against the caprock leads to breaks. Additionally, the permeability of the rock allows horizontal (below ground) movement of the water discharged by breaks, causing in some cases a significant delay in locating where the main breaks occur. Repair TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.7 and replacement of the mains requires jackhammering of the caprock in order to excavate trenches for repairs, extending the time and cost necessary to place the main back in service 3.3 FGUA OWNED PROPERTY FGUA owns three (3) parcels with which the WTF, WWTF, and water booster station are located. The parcels are all located within the FGUA service area and are contained within chain-link fencing. Each site has motorized gates with keypads for access. The following information is a summary of the parcels from the Collier County Property Appraiser’s website: Table 3-1 FGUA Owned Parcels Facility Parcel No. Site address Zoning Acres Market Value WTF 36560120009 4300 Golden Gate Pkwy Golf Course 2.21 $203,044 WWTF 36450440006 4934 32nd Ave SW Residential Single Family-3 14.9 $623,851 Booster Station 37920040003 4781 Green Blvd Exception: Public Utilities 3.89 $248,936 Figures 3-3, 3-4, and 3-5 provide aerials of the FGUA owned sites. The WWTF has limited room for an expansion, however the rapid infiltration basins (RIBs) are rarely utilized and if the site warrants an expansion and/or another utility use, a second-deep injection well (DIW) could provide the required disposal reliability and the site could be expanded. The WTF has limited room for an expansion as it is currently configured. The decommissioned lime softening plant could be demolished to allow for additional treatment options. FGUA staff indicated interest in utilizing the old abandoned lime softening plant location for an additional reverse osmosis (RO) treatment skid. The potable water booster pump station site has significant room for an expansion or alternative uses, however there appear to be wetlands located on the site as well. Any expansion of the site will need to consider impacts to wetlands. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.8 Figure 3-3 WWTF Site Aerial Figure 3-4 WTF Site Aerial TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.9 Figure 3-5 Potable Water Booster Station Site Aerial 3.4 POPULATIONS, WASTEWATER FLOWS, AND POTABLE WATER DEMAND Populations and wastewater flows and potable water demands were developed based on parcel count data. Table 3-2 lists provides a breakdown for the total number of parcels within the active FGUA service area (Golden Gate City), the number of parcels estimated to be on septic and well systems within Golden Gate City, and then the number of parcels estimated to be served by FGUA. This evaluation does not consider parcels north of Green Boulevard and west of Santa Barbara Boulevard. There are currently 5,089 parcels within FGUA’s active service area, and there is a 1% vacancy based on the recent Property Appraiser information. A land use map is provided in Figure 3-6. I 75CR 951GOLDEN GATE PKWYStantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 tel 239.649.4040 fax 239.263.6449 Figure 3-6 FGUA Service Area Land Use Map June 2017 0 700 1,400 Feet ($$¯\\US1226-F01\U:\177311018\gis\mxd\Figure3-6_FGUA_LandUse_20170609_v02_103504.mxd Revised: 2017-06-09 By: cbernerDisclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. L E G E N D FGUA Service Area Land Use Residential Commercial Industrial Agriculture Institutional Government Owned Miscellaneous Prepared by:C.J.B. 06/09/17 Notes: 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Florida East FIPS 0901 Feet 2. Source data: Boundary omitted from Collier County Service Area Boudnaries, Collier County Property Appraiser 3. Imagery: Collier County 2016 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.11 Table 3-2 Parcel Count Parcel Type GGC Total GGC Septic Tank Areas FGUA Parcels Served Single Family Lots 4,177 2,583 1,594 Apartment/Multiplex Units 3,095 661 2,434 Condo Units 773 12 761 Commercial 253 35 218 Institutional 31 17 14 Vacant Residential 173 129 44 Vacant Commercial 53 29 24 Total 8,555 3,466 5,089 Percent Vacant 3% 5% 1% Populations were estimated based on 2015 Census data for Collier County, which estimates that on average there are 2.59 people per household within Collier County. Residential parcels were evaluated to estimate the population currently served by FGUA and potential populations served by FGUA, should there be an expansion of either the water or wastewater systems. Table 3-3 provides population estimates for Golden Gate City, areas within Golden Gate City on septic systems, and populations currently served by FGUA. These estimates were developed based on 2.59 people per household. Table 3-3 Population Estimates GGC Total GGC Septic Tank Areas FGUA Parcels Served Residential Units - Occupied 8,045 3,256 4,789 Residential Units - Vacant 173 129 44 Residential Units Buildout 8,218 3,385 4,833 Existing Population 20,837 8,433 12,404 Buildout Population 21,285 8,767 12,517 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.12 Based on this desktop analysis, FGUA currently provides water and wastewater service to approximately 12,404 residents, or approximately 60% of Golden Gate City. The total potential customer base, should the County choose to expand service to all of Golden Gate City, is 21,284. This is a buildout population for the Golden Gate City portion of the FGUA service area. Potable water and wastewater flow demands were developed based on the Collier County standards of: • Wastewater - 100 gallon per capita per day • Water – 150 gallons per capita per day The Collier County standards may be considered conservative; however, they are appropriate for this high-level evaluation. Table 3-4 lists the estimated wastewater flows and potable water demands for areas currently served by FGUA and for the larger Golden Gate City. This Table 3-4 Flows and Demand Estimates GGC Total FGUA Parcels Served Existing Wastewater Flow Estimate (MGD) 2.08 1.24 Buildout Wastewater Flow Estimate (MGD) 2.13 1.25 Existing Water Demand Estimate (MGD) 3.13 1.86 Buildout Water Demand Estimate (MGD) 3.19 1.88 A review of the historical wastewater flows and potable water for 2015 and 2016 is provided. In general, the historical wastewater flow and potable water demands for 2016 are slightly lower than the estimates developed utilizing the Collier County standard per capita rates. For wastewater, the annual average flows treated in 2016 were approximately 1.1 MGD. The theoretical estimates are approximately 12% higher. Similarly, the annual average potable water usage is approximately 1.1 MGD for 2016, which is significantly lower than the theoretical estimates developed utilizing Collier County standards. A detailed discussion on historical flows and plant capacity is provided in later sections of this report. Should the County choose to expand service, a thorough evaluation of per capita water use and wastewater generation will be required. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.13 3.5 WASTEWATER SYSTEM 3.5.1 Wastewater Collection and Conveyance System The FGUA Golden Gate City wastewater collection and conveyance system map is shown on Figure 3-7. The total wastewater conveyance system consists of roughly 85,000 LF of pressurized pipe, 108,000 LF of gravity pipe, and 37 total pump stations – of which 8 are private stations that manifold into FGUA owned force mains. Wastewater is pumped to the FGUA WWTF which is located in the southern portion of Golden Gate City. The collection system also contains a number of manual air release valves and system valves which are checked and exercised annually. USWSC’s valve exercising program generally is split into six (6) month cycles where valves are checked and exercised within the first six months and any necessary replacements are done the following six (6) months. Table 3-5 lists a breakdown of system quantities based on FGUA’s GIS database which was provided to Collier County. Table 3-5 Wastewater Conveyance System Quantities Feature Length (LF)/Quantity Gravity Sewer 107,892 Force Main 84,676 Air Release Valve 7 Valve 324 Lift Station 37 (8 private) Manholes 437 3.5.2 Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facility The Golden Gate City Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) was originally constructed in the 1960’s with an expansion of the plant in 2008. Figure 3-8 illustrates the wastewater treatment plant site plan. There are two “Package Plants” identified as Modified Treatment Unit (Plant 1) and Modified Equalization Basin (Plant 2). As part of the development of this study, Stantec staff performed two (2) separate site visits to the site and spoke with USWSC staff to evaluate the condition of the wastewater treatment facilities. Each of the two (2) Package plants contain an aeration basin as part of the outer ring of the tank, and a clarifier within the inner ring. Both plants are served by a common headworks, which includes a parshall flume, manual bar screen, step screen and grit removal system. An odor control system is located under the headworks. There are three (3) chlorine contact chambers, TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.14 one in each plant and a separate tank located between the plants. Disinfection is provided by a sodium hypochlorite system located below the headworks. The WWTF site also contains a 300,000-gallon digester, a metal pre-fabricated building housing the backup diesel generator, motor control center (MCC), and two (2) blowers. Further east on the site there is an injection well pump station, deep injection well (DIW) and monitoring well. The WWTF utilizes a Citect SCADA system. Figure 3-9 contains the process flow diagram of the WWTF. The general operation of Plant 1 has the raw wastewater flow through the aeration basin which includes six (6) zones: Anoxic Zone, Aeration Zone, Anaerobic Zone, Aerobic Zone, Anaerobic Zone and the Re-Aeration Zone. After the fifth zone, the wastewater is conveyed to the inner clarifier. The Return Activated Sludge (RAS)/Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) pumps return the sludge from Clarifier #1 to Zone #1. WAS is pumped to the 300,000-gallon digester. FGUA has an agreement with Synagro to dewater on-site and haul the solids to the designated landfill in Charlotte County, FL. The plant generally achieves 2-2.5% solids prior to dewatering and hauling. Staff indicated solids are held in the digester until it fills up at which point the liquid is drained back to the head of the plant and Synagro pumps the solids into their dewatering centrifuge. 3.5.3 Wastewater Treatment Facility Permit Requirements FGUA is authorized to operate the Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) in accordance with the State of Florida, Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Domestic Wastewater Facility Permit No. FLA142140. This permit was issued on June 6, 2015 and expires on June 15, 2020. The WWTF has a permitted capacity of 1.5000 MGD, annual average daily flow (AADF) and 1.8 MGD three-month average daily flow (TMADF). The plant is a complete multi- zone activated sludge process with the following permitted processes and tankage: • Mechanical barscreen • Manual bar rack • Cyclone degritter • Equalization basin of 269,648 gallons • First anoxic zone of 70,000 gallons • First aeration zone of 351,437 gallons • First anaerobic zone of 141,062 gallons • Second aerobic zone of 150,000 gallons • Second anaerobic zone of 93,750 gallons ÆÇ ÆÇ ÆÇ ÆÇ ÆÇ ÆÇ ÆÇ !!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2[Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú[Ú[Ú[Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú §¨¦SANTA BARBARA BLVD") GREEN BLVD HUNTER BLVDSUNSHINE BLVDTROPICANA BLVDSU N S E T R D §¨¦ ")GOLDEN GATE PKWYStantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 tel 239.649.4040 fax 239.263.6449 Figure 3-7 FGUA Existing Wastewater Collection & Conveyance System Map June 2017 0 650 1,300 Feet ($$¯\\US1226-F01\U:\177311018\gis\mxd\Figure3-7_FGUA_WastewaterDistribution_20170609_v02_103504.mxd Revised: 2017-06-09 By: cbernerDisclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. L E G E N D !!2 Manhole ÆÇ Air Release Valve [Ú Pump Station [Ú Deep Injection Well Sanitary Gravity Main Sanitary Force Main FGUA Service Area Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Facility Prepared by:C.J.B. 06/09/17 DIGESTER HEADWORKS BLOWER AND GENERATOR BUILDING DIESEL STORAGE TANK ADMIN BLDG CHLORINE CONTACT CHAMBER WWTP PARCEL BOUNDARY TROPICANA BLVDEMERGENCY INFILTRATION BASIN EMERGENCY INFILTRATION BASIN EMERGENCY INFILTRATION BASIN EMERGENCY INFILTRATION BASIN TROPICANA BLVD32nd AVE SW 32nd AVE SW 31st AVE SW 31st PI AVE SWSHELL CANALINJECTION WELL PUMP STATION INJECTION WELL PAD MONITORING WELL PAD 10'x10' CONCRETE PAD10'x10' CONCRETE PAD MODIFIED TREATMENT UNIT (PLANT 1) CLARIFIER NO 1 CLARIFIER NO 2 MODIFIED EQUALIZATION BASIN (PLANT 2) RAS PUMPS WAS PUMPS 10'x10' CONCRETE PAD 10'x10' CONCRETE PAD N FIGURE Title Project No. Client/Project \\Us1226-f01\workgroup\1773\active\177311018\drawing\set01\active\civil\exhibit\11018_C-WWTP-FIG-2.dwg2017/06/09 3:02 PM By: Laterza, Mikewww.stantec.com Florida Certificate No. 27013 Stantec Consulting Ltd. 239.649.4040 Naples, Florida 34108 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. #300 COLLIER COUNTY GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SERVICE AREA WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY SITE PLAN 177311018 3-8 HEADWORKS MECHANICAL SCREEN GRIT REMOVAL PARSHALL FLUME (INFLUENT FLOWMETER) ZONE #1 ANOXIC ZONE 70,000 GALLONS DT = 67 MIN ZONE #2 AERATION ZONE 351,437 GALLONS DT = 5 HR 37 MIN ZONE #3 ANAEROBIC ZONE 141,062 GALLONS DT = 2 HR 16 MIN ZONE #4 AEROBIC ZONE 150,000 GALLONS DT = 2 HR 24 MIN ZONE #5 ANAEROBIC ZONE 93,750 GALLONS DT = 1 HR 30 MIN ZONE #6 RE-AERATION ZONE 32,680 GALLONS DT = 31 MIN CLARIFIER #1 60' DIAMETER 2,827 SF DEPTH = 15.0 FT CHLORINE CONTACT CHAMBER #1 19,100 GALLONS CHLORINE CONTACT CHAMBER #1A 3,813 GALLONS MIN CLARIFIER #2 48' DIAMETER 1,810 SF DEPTH = 13.9 FT CHLORINE CONTACT CHAMBER #2 18,400 GALLONS V-NOTCH WEIR NEW DIGESTER 58' DIAMETER 300,000 GALLONS DEPTH = 15 FT V-NOTCH WEIR TRUCK LOADING TO LANDFILL (42,600 GAL/DAY) TO LANDFILL FLOW EQUALIZATION 269,648 GALLONS AIR AIR AIR NaOCl CLASS I INJECTION WELL OR PERCOLATION PONDS EFFLUENT SAMPLER AIR SLUDGE 4.262 LB/DAY NaOCl WASSLUDGEAIRLIFT PUMPEDRAS 75-100% 1.5 MGD INFLUENT INFLUENT SAMPLER AIR FIGURE Title Project No. Client/Project \\us1226-f01\workgroup\1773\active\177311018\drawing\set01\active\general\exhibit\11018-G-0X2.dwg2017/06/09 11:21 AM By: Laterza, Mikewww.stantec.com Florida Certificate No. 27013 Stantec Consulting Ltd. 239.649.4040 Naples, Florida 34108 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. #300 COLLIER COUNTY FGUA GOLDEN GATE CITY CITY WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM 177311018 3-9 NOTE: INFORMATION FROM THE GOLDEN GATE CITY WWTP 1.5 MGD EXPANSION - ARCADIS 2006. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.18 • Reaeration zone of 32,680 gallons • Clarifier #1 (60-foot diameter) • Clarifier #2 (98-foot diameter) • Three chlorine contact chambers (19,100 gallons, 3,813 gallons, and 18,400 gallons) • Three-stage digester tank (300,000 gallons) Disposal consists of 1.25 MGD (AADF) capacity rapid infiltration basins (RIBs) which are able to dispose of reclaimed water and demineralization concentrate from the reverse osmosis water treatment facility. A 5.0 MGD (daily max) deep injection well is the primary means of disposal, the RIBs are rarely utilized. All disposal is located on the plant site. 3.5.3.1 Effluent Quality Requirements All FDEP permit limitations and reporting requirements are listed in the FDEP Operating Permit. Table 3-6 and 3-7 lists the permit effluent limitations for the plant. Table 3-6 Permit Effluent Limitations Reuse and Land Application System Rapid Infiltration Basins (R-001) Parameter Units Max/Min/Avg Annual Average 3MADF Monthly Average Weekly Sample Single Flow, to R-001 MGD Maximum 1.25 Report BOD, Carbonaceous 5 day, 20C mg/l Maximum 20.0 30.0 45.0 60.0 TSS mg/l Maximum 20.0 30.0 45.0 60.0 pH st. units Range - - - 6.0-8.5 Coliform Fecal, % less than detection* % Minimum 200 200 - 800 TRC mg/l Minimum - - - 0.5 Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) mg/l Maximum 12.0 Phosphorus, Total mg/l Maximum Report Nitrogen, Total mg/l Maximum Report Flow (concentrate) MGD Maximum Report Report TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.19 Table 3-7 Permit Effluent Limitations Deep Injection Well (U-001) Parameter Units Max/Min/Avg Daily Max Single Flow, to U-001 GPM Maximum 3,495 BOD, Carbonaceous 5 day, 20C mg/l Maximum Report TSS mg/l Maximum Report 3.5.3.2 Ground Water Quality Monitoring Requirements Quarterly ground water quality monitoring is required at the five (5) compliance well locations. According to the permit, there are no background or intermediate wells. A background well typically is installed to gather the groundwater monitoring samples of the groundwater prior to it entering the RIBs zone of discharge or influence. Without the background well data, it is difficult to determine if the RIBs are affecting the groundwater. The required ground water wells and monitoring parameters analyzed are listed in Table 3-8 and Table 3-9. Table 3-8 Ground Water Quality Monitoring Wells Monitoring Well ID Alternate Well Name and/or Description of Monitoring Location Aquifer Monitored New or Existing MWC-20521 P-5 Compliance well located on the north end of the facilities property line. Surficial Existing MWC-20522 P-4 Compliance well located on the north end of the facilities property line. Surficial Existing MWC-20523 P-3 Compliance well located on the west end of the facilities property line. Surficial Existing MWC-20524 P-2 Compliance well located on the south end of the facilities property line. Surficial Existing MWC-20525 P-1 Compliance well located on the east end of the facilities property line. Surficial Existing Table 3-9 Ground Water Monitoring Parameters Parameter Compliance Well Limits Units Water Level Relative to NGVD Report ft Arsenic, Total Recoverable 10 µg/L Cadmium, Total Recoverable 5 µg/L Chloride (as Cl) 250 mg/L Chromium, Total Recoverable 100 µg/L Coliform, Fecal 0 #/100mL Lead, Total Recoverable 15 µg/L Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) 10 mg/L Oxygen, Dissolved (DO) Report mg/L pH 6.5-8.5 s.u. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.20 Table 3-9 Ground Water Monitoring Parameters Parameter Compliance Well Limits Units Sodium, Total Recoverable 160 mg/L Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS) 500 mg/L Specific Conductance Report µmho/cm Sulfate, Total 250 mg/L Temperature, water Report Degrees C Turbidity Report NTU 3.5.3.3 Deep Injection Well Requirements The FGUA Golden Gate WTF and WWTF Class 1 Injection Well System is permitted under FDEP Permit Number 263889-003-UO/1l, issued July 16, 2012 and expires July 12, 2017 IWACs ID No. 98626). The system consists of a single Class I Deep Injection Well IW-1 and one Dual Zone Monitor Well DZMW- 1. The Class I Industrial Well System is for disposal of R.O. concentrate from the WTF and domestic wastewater effluent from the WWTF. The Maximum Disposal Rate is 3,495 gallons per minute (GPM), or 5.03 million gallons per day (MGD), while the permitted Maximum Injection Pressure is 103 pounds per square inch (psi). Recent Permitting and Compliance Events include the following: • May 2017 - In response to expiration date of July 15, 2017, FGUA submitted application for renewal of operations permit. • Sept. 2016 - Compliance Assistance Offer (CAO) issued regarding possible monitor well malfunction and/or fluid migration. Upper Monitor Zone Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) concentrations have increased while Lower Monitor Zone TDS concentrations have fallen. Both zones now exhibit “essentially identical” TDS concentrations. An FDEP Memorandum attached to the CAO states “The similarity of the water quality from the upper and lower monitor zones illustrate that monitor well integrity may now be suspect.” • Mar. 2014 - FGUA submitted Mechanical Integrity Test Report of MIT performed in August 2013 and reports a rock obstruction at 2,506 feet below pad level which is 34 feet below the base of the 18-inch injection casing. The report states that the rock is not impacting the performance of the well and that FGUA has received scope and pricing for removal of the blockage and reports it will attempt removal if this becomes necessary. MIT report also states that anomalies with water quality in the Upper and Lower Monitor Zones is believed to be caused by purge volume inconsistencies. In response to the CAO, additional assessment will likely be required to access the integrity of the dual zone monitoring well and/or potential hydraulic connection between aquifers. The rock obstruction in injection well IW-1 appears to have not impacted injectivity of the well; however, the obstruction prevents advancing geophysical tools beyond the rock. The FDEP has allowed Mechanical Integrity Testing to continue without requiring the advancement of tools TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.21 beyond the obstruction. Should the obstruction impact well injectivity or if the need arises to advance geophysical tools below the rock, this obstruction may need to be removed. Table 3-10 provides Construction Information of the Injection Well IW-1, and Table 3-11 provides Construction Information of the Monitoring Well DZMW-1. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.22 Table 3-11 Monitoring Well DZMW-1 Well Name Casing Diameter and Type Depth Cased (bls)/Total (bls) Aquifer DZMW-1 (Upper) 34” Steel 52’ DZMW-1 (Upper) 24” Steel 490’ DZMW-1 (Upper) 16” Steel 1078’ Upper Zone Monitoring Interval From 1078’ to 1128’ - Suwannee Limestone of Upper Floridan Aquifer DZMW-1 (Lower) 6.625” O.D. FRP Lower Zone Monitoring Interval From 1498’ to 1550’ (backplugged with cement from 1618’ to 1550’ bls) Ocala Formation of Upper Floridan Aquifer FRP = Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic / bls = Below Land Surface 3.5.3.4 Biosolids Requirements Biosolids generated by the plant are permitted to be transferred to Charlotte County Bio- Recycling Center, or disposed of in a Class I solid waste landfill. The permit states that transferring biosolids to an alternative biosolids treatment facility does not require a permit modification; however, use of an alternative biosolids treatment facility requires submittal of a copy of the agreement pursuant to Rule 62-640.880(1)(c), F.A.C., along with a written notification to the Department at least 30 days before transport of the biosolids. Reporting requirements for biosolids includes the monthly maximum dry tons produced and the monthly maximum dry tons transferred. 3.5.3.5 Staffing Requirements The plant is permitted as a Category II, Class B facility (plants from 1.0 MGD to 5.0 MGD), therefore the FAC and the permit state the staffing requirements as follows: Table 3-10 Injection Well IW-1 Casing Diameter and Type Depth Cased (ft. bls) Open Hole Interval Aquifer 48” Steel Pit 55’ 36” Steel Surface Casing 490’ 28” Steel Intermediate Casing 1580’ 18” 0.50” WT Steel Injection Casing 2472’ 11.97” I.D. 0.68 WT FRP Tubing 2461’ Open Hole Interval From 2472’ to 3110’ Oldsmar Formation of Lower Floridan Aquifer TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.23 • A Class C or higher operator 16 hours/day for 7 days/week. The lead/chief operator must be a Class B operator, or higher. [62-620.630(3)] [62-699.310] • The lead/chief operator shall be employed at the plant full time. "Full time" shall mean at least 4 days per week, working a minimum of 35 hours per week, including leave time. A licensed operator shall be on-site and in charge of each required shift for periods of required staffing time when the lead/chief operator is not on-site. An operator meeting the lead/chief operator class for the treatment plant shall be available during all periods of plant operation. "Available" means able to be contacted as needed to initiate the appropriate action in a timely manner. [62-699.311(10), (6) and (1)] 3.5.3.6 Industrial Pretreatment Requirements There are currently no existing industrial contributors to the wastewater system. Therefore, this facility is not required to have a pretreatment program at this time. [62-625.500] 3.5.3.7 Administrative Order The FDEP operating permit for the plant contains an Administrative Order (AO-20150616-SD). Table 3-12 lists the items as listed in AO-20150616_SD, as of the August 1, 2016 revision. A Variance was granted by FDEP to allow discharge of blended reclaimed water and concentrate to be discharged to rapid infiltration basin (RIB) system. Records show that 99.95% of effluent is disposed via deep injection and that RIB disposal rarely occurs. Table 3-12 Administration Order Required Completion Action Required Completion Date Status 1. Provide the Department a revised and accurate Process Flow Diagram that includes the demineralization concentrate line to the effluent pump station. July 31, 2015 Not confirmed complete 2. In accordance with the table contained in Section 6 on page 27 of the revised O&M Performance Report, the permittee shall conduct inspections for rust, and evaluate and catalog the areas of urgency for repair. July 31, 2015 6/15/16 FGUA letter to FDEP indicates that the site was inspected to determine length of project to repair. 3. The permittee shall complete repair to the rusted parts cataloged for urgency pursuant to item III.1.2 of this AO20150616-SD. July 1, 2017 Not confirmed complete (FGUA requested time extension to 7/1/17 in 6/15/16 letter to FDEP) 4. The permittee shall install and calibrate a flow measuring device designed to accurately January 31, 2016 Complete 4/13/16 as stated in 6/15/16 FGUA letter to FDEP. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.24 Table 3-12 Administration Order Required Completion Action Required Completion Date Status measure the flow from the effluent pump station to the percolation ponds R-001. 5. Regarding the blending of demineralization concentrate with reclaimed water: the permittee shall either obtain a variance which grants relief from Rule 62-610.865, F.A.C., or shall fully comply with Rule 62-610.865, F.A.C., which requires an engineering report, evaluation of vegetation tolerance, additional parameter limits, an enforceable blending ratio, continuous monitoring equipment, and other specific requirements. (The Department understands that blending concentrate with reclaimed water is done very infrequently and that FGUA might choose to petition for variance relief from strict application of the rule requirements.) June 30, 2016 Complete. Variance granted by FDEP on 6/2/16 following request for variance from FGUA on 12/10/15. 3.5.4 Historical Flows The historical influent flows and loadings were tabulated over two (2) years (March 2015-February 2017). Table 3-13 lists the influent flows to the WWTF. Table 3-13 Influent Flows Influent Flows, FLW-01 (MGD) 2015 2016 MONTH MADF TMADF MDF MADF TMADF MDF January 0.890 0.973 1.050 1.270 1.187 2.500 February 0.940 0.947 1.410 1.040 1.163 1.200 March 0.960 0.930 1.100 1.050 1.120 1.300 April 0.920 0.940 1.110 0.690 0.927 1.100 May 0.910 0.930 1.130 0.650 0.797 2.200 June 1.130 0.987 1.310 1.060 0.800 1.400 July 1.340 1.127 2.010 1.280 0.997 1.800 August 1.210 1.227 1.600 1.480 1.273 2.600 September 1.240 1.263 1.900 1.340 1.367 1.900 October 1.090 1.180 1.400 1.155 1.325 NR November 1.110 1.147 2.200 NR 1.248 NR December 1.180 1.127 1.400 0.930 1.043 1.200 Average 1.077 1.086 Maximum 1.340 1.263 2.200 1.480 1.367 2.600 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.25 The annual average daily flow (AADF) to the WWTF, in 2016, was 1.086 MGD. The maximum three month rolling annual average (TMADF), in 2016, was 1.367 MGD. In 2016, the facility is operating at approximately 73% of the permitted capacity (1.5 MGD AADF) on an AADF basis. The facility is operating at approximately 76% of its capacity on a maximum TMADF basis. In 2011, a Capacity Analysis Report was submitted to the FDEP (Appendix B). As stated in the CAR, the facility does experience seasonal variations in flow, which appears to be higher in August, September, and October. This appears to be the case for 2016 as well. FGUA indicates they have an ongoing infiltration and inflow (I/I) reduction program to identify and correct problem areas that allow I/I to enter the WWTF’s collection system. Based on discussions with staff, I/I reduction strategies do not appear to be targeted, but reactionary in nature. Table 3-14 lists the influent loadings to the WWTF. Table 3-14 Influent Loadings, FLW-01 (MGD) 2015 2016 2015 2016 CBOD5, Monthly Max CBOD5, Monthly Avg. CBOD5, Monthly Max CBOD5, Monthly Avg. TSS, Monthly Max TSS, Monthly Avg. TSS, Monthly Max TSS, Monthly Avg. MONTH (lb/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) January 3,897 2,936 3,824 2,698 1,863 1,191 2,097 1,491 February 3,293 2,850 4,489 3,112 1,239 702 3,801 1,891 March 5,647 3,514 3,397 3,397 2,967 1,388 1,729 1,729 April 3,181 2,725 1,974 1,415 1,380 1,108 724 588 May 3,011 2,271 2,340 1,475 900 650 2,193 864 June 3,478 NR 2,492 1,832 NR NR 1,312 1,019 July 3,634 2,527 2,405 1,881 917 741 1,618 1,080 August 4,878 2,822 4,743 2,913 38,925 8,251 1,969 1,569 September 5,007 3,600 4,648 2,347 2,778 159 2,195 1,347 October 3,770 2,017 2,967 NR 546 448 2,726 NR November 3,732 2,284 NR NR 4,168 1,495 NR NR December 3,038 2,155 3,754 2,556 1,318 855 1,324 1,013 Average 3,880 2,700 3,367 2,363 5,182 1,544 1,972 1,259 Maximum 5,647 3,600 4,743 3,397 38,925 8,251 3,801 1,891 Influent CBOD5 and TSS concentrations are reported weekly. The monthly average concentration and monthly average daily flow were used to calculate month’s average loadings to the WWTF for 2015 and 2016. A review of the 2011 capacity analysis report indicates that the current loadings are within ranges used to establish the design capacity. June 2017Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant0.00.51.01.52.0Jan-15Feb-15Mar-15Apr-15May-15Jun-15Jul-15Aug-15Sep-15Oct-15Nov-15Dec-15Jan-16Feb-16Mar-16Apr-16May-16Jun-16Jul-16Aug-16Sep-16Oct-16Nov-16Dec-16Monthly Average Daily Flow (MGD) Figure 3-10Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant Influent FlowsMonthly Average Daily Flow (MGD)2015-2016 June 2017Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant0.00.51.01.5Jan-15Feb-15Mar-15Apr-15May-15Jun-15Jul-15Aug-15Sep-15Oct-15Nov-15Dec-15Jan-16Feb-16Mar-16Apr-16May-16Jun-16Jul-16Aug-16Sep-16Oct-16Nov-16Dec-16Three-Month Average Daily Flow (MGD) Figure 3-11Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant Influent FlowsThree-Month Average Daily Flow (MGD)2015-2016 June 2017Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant0.00.51.01.52.02.53.0Jan-15Feb-15Mar-15Apr-15May-15Jun-15Jul-15Aug-15Sep-15Oct-15Nov-15Dec-15Jan-16Feb-16Mar-16Apr-16May-16Jun-16Jul-16Aug-16Sep-16Oct-16Nov-16Dec-16Annual Average Daily Flow (MGD) Figure 3-12Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant Influent FlowsMax Day Flow (MGD)2015-2016 June 2017Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,000Jan-15Feb-15Mar-15Apr-15May-15Jun-15Jul-15Aug-15Sep-15Oct-15Nov-15Dec-15Jan-16Feb-16Mar-16Apr-16May-16Jun-16Jul-16Aug-16Sep-16Oct-16Nov-16Dec-16Max Month & Monthly Average CBOD5 (lb/day) Figure 3-13Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant Influent ConcentrationsMax Month & Monthly Average CBOD5 (lb/day)2015-2016Avg MonthMax Month June 2017Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant1101001,00010,000100,000Jan-15Feb-15Mar-15Apr-15May-15Jun-15Jul-15Aug-15Sep-15Oct-15Nov-15Dec-15Jan-16Feb-16Mar-16Apr-16May-16Jun-16Jul-16Aug-16Sep-16Oct-16Nov-16Dec-16Max Month & Monthly Average TSS (lb/day) Figure 3-14Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant Influent ConcentrationsMax Month & Monthly Average TSS (lb/day)2015-2016Avg MonthMax Month TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.31 The historical effluent flows and loadings were tabulated over two (2) years (2015-2016). Table 3- 15 lists the effluent flows and Table 3-16 lists the loadings. Table 3-15 Effluent Flows 2015 2016 FLW-02 to UIW (MGD) FLW-03, to Ponds FLW-04, RO Concentrate to Pump Station FLW-02 to UIW (MGD) FLW-03, to Ponds FLW-04, RO Concentrate to Pump Station MONTH Monthly Avg. (GPM) Max Daily (GPM) Monthly Avg. (MGD) Monthly Avg. (MGD) Monthly Avg. (GPM) Max Daily (GPM) Monthly Avg. (MGD) Monthly Avg. (MGD) January NR NR 1.03 NR 925.7 1,751.0 0.02 0.26 February NR NR 1.09 NR 811.1 946.5 NR 0.25 March NR NR 1.09 NR 825.8 1,008.1 NR 0.27 April NR NR 1.04 NR 769.3 867.8 0.18 0.26 May NR NR 1.03 NR 783.8 963.0 0.00 0.26 June 855.1 2,634.0 NR 0.26 822.6 1,348.0 NR 0.19 July 997.2 1,451.0 0.01 0.25 969.6 1,306.4 0.00 0.19 August 905.1 1,185.6 NR 0.24 1,092.8 1,867.6 NR 0.31 September 935.1 1,337.3 NR 0.27 1,010.8 1,368.2 0.00 0.25 October 837.8 1,002.6 0.01 0.26 NR 1,037.7 0.03 0.26 November 865.6 1,162.9 0.00 0.25 NR NR NR NR December 905.4 1,012.1 0.00 0.27 827.6 1,075.4 0.00 0.25 Average 900.2 1,397.9 0.6 0.3 883.9 1,230.9 0.0 0.2 Maximum 997.2 2,634.0 1.1 0.3 1,092.8 1,867.6 0.2 0.3 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.32 Table 3-16 Effluent Loadings 2015 2016 2015 2016 CBOD5, Monthly Max CBOD5, Monthly Avg. CBOD5, Monthly Max CBOD5, Monthly Avg. TSS, Monthly Max TSS, Monthly Avg. TSS, Monthly Max TSS, Monthly Avg. MONTH (lb/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) (lb/day) January 22.3 16.7 21.2 21.2 11.9 8.5 116.5 63.6 February 15.7 15.7 69.6 26.1 26.7 14.3 31.3 24.4 March 40.0 25.6 26.2 12.2 27.2 15.2 36.7 21.8 April 15.3 15.3 57.9 23.2 10.7 6.9 23.7 18.5 May 22.7 17.4 38.2 19.1 12.9 9.1 70.9 23.5 June 28.3 NR 35.2 24.7 NR NR 289.8 96.9 July 44.9 31.4 21.3 10.6 56.1 26.9 29.8 24.5 August 80.5 34.2 24.8 5.0 31.2 20.1 17.3 13.6 September 20.7 20.7 22.4 22.4 101.6 36.3 51.5 22.4 October 27.3 20.9 77.1 NR 28.2 20.0 8.7 NR November 55.7 32.5 NR NR 53.8 26.9 NR NR December 88.5 55.1 139.3 60.4 463.1 170.1 193.5 92.1 Average 38.5 26.0 48.5 22.5 74.9 32.2 79.1 40.1 Maximum 88.5 55.1 139.3 60.4 463.1 170.1 289.8 96.9 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.33 3.5.5 Wastewater Treatment Facility Field Investigations A limited visual inspection was performed by Stantec staff while onsite at the FGUA WWTF facilities on May 30, 2017. The sections below include a summary of the reported conditions. The discussion is organized by process as follows: 1. Headworks 2. Package Plant 1 3. Package Plant 2 4. Digester 5. RAS and WAS 6. Injection well pumping system 7. Accessory structures 8. Deep injection and monitoring well 9. Rapid Infiltration Basins 3.5.5.1 Headworks The wastewater is pumped to the headworks which contains a parshall flume for flow measurement, manual bar screen, step screen, and grit removal system. Figure 3-15 illustrates the location of the headworks at the WWTF site. Refer to Photo 3-1 of the headworks. During the site investigations, no major issues were observed for the headworks. The headworks are accessible from both Plant 1 and Plant 2 via an aluminum access bridge. Access was limited to Plant 2, as Plant 1’s decking was removed for the ongoing improvements taking place at Plant 1. The aluminum hatches on the top of the headworks were observed to bow inward when stepped on. Thicker plates may be necessary for additional safety. Figure 3-15 Headworks Location at WWTF Site TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.34 Photo 3-1 Headworks at WWTF Site There is an odor control unit at the headworks and odors were not detected at time of visit. 3.5.5.2 Package Plant 1 As discussed in previous sections there are three (3) steel tanks on the site, two (2) of which are package plants where primary and secondary treatment occurs. Package Plant 1 provides the majority of both primary and secondary treatment. It consists of aeration basins, a clarifier and chlorine contact chamber. Figure 3-16 illustrates the location of Plant 1 within the FGUA Wastewater Treatment Facility site. Figure 3-16 Package Plant 1 Location at WWTF At the time of the site visit, Package Plant 1 tank was under repair. The purpose for the repairs of the plant was due to signs of significant corrosion and structural failure. As part of the recent WWTF Permit renewal, FDEP included an Administrative Order stating that repairs to the rusted plant TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.35 components be completed. In addition, rags and debris had accumulated in the surge tank due to lack of a functional influent structure. The debris had to be removed from the system to prevent downstream equipment failure. As such, an evaluation of the mechanical equipment could not be performed due to the ongoing repairs. Structural work was being completed on the interior and exterior of the steel tank. The interior walls appeared to have been recently coated. Wall pipe penetrations appeared to be sealed. All decking was removed but appeared to be in decent condition. All handrails and stairs also appeared in good condition. There were spots along the exterior of the tank where rust was observed. It is expected that Plant 1 will be in good condition upon completion of repairs. Photo 3-2 shows the interiors of the Package Plant 1 tank while Photo 3-3 shows the exteriors of the Package Plant 1 at the time of the site visit. Photo 3-2 Interior of Plant 1 Tank Photo 3-3 Exterior of Plant 1 Tank TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.36 3.5.5.3 Package Plant 2 As indicated previously, the Package Plant 1 was shut down completely for repairs at the time of the site visit. As such, Package Plant 2 was operating at higher than normal loading rates. Figure 3-17 provides the location of Plant 2 within the wastewater treatment facility. During the site visit, significant odors were detected from Plant 2. All tank penetrations appeared to be in good condition and as with Plant 1 rust spots were observed on the exterior of the steel tank. All decking appeared to be in decent condition, with some areas showing signs of corrosion. All handrails and stairs appeared in good condition, with signs of minor corrosion. Photo 3-4 shows the exteriors of the Package Plant 2 tank at the time of the site visit. Figure 3-17 Package Plant 2 Location at WWTF Photo 3-4 Package Plant 2 Tank Exterior 3.5.5.4 Solid Handling As indicated previously, Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) is pumped from Package Plant 1 and Package Plant 2 into the 300,000-gallon digester for storage. Figure 3-18 illustrates the location of the digester at the wastewater treatment facility. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.37 Figure 3-18 Digester Location at WWTF Two positive displacement blowers provide aeration and were observed to be in good condition. Staff indicated solids are held until the tank reaches capacity at which point the remaining liquid is pumped back to Clarifier #1 or Clarifier #2. Staff also indicated the digester has a dissolved oxygen (DO) probe. All tank penetrations appeared to be in good condition and a few rust spots were observed on the exterior of the steel tank. All handrails and stairs appeared in good condition. Photo 3-5 shows the tank conditions at the wastewater treatment facilities. Photo 3-5 Digester Tank at WWTF 3.5.5.5 RAS / WAS Pump Station The RAS / WAS pumps direct sludge to either Aeration Zone 1 (RAS) or to the digester (WAS). Figure 3-19 illustrates the location of the RAS/WAS assemblies at the FGUA site. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.38 Figure 3-19 RAS / WAS Pumps Location at WWTF The pumps are Super T Series manufactured by Gorman-Rupp and were observed to be in good condition. The electric motors for the pumps were 5HP Baldor Reliance and 15 HP Marathon Electrics. The pumping assembly included Kennedy Check Valves and DeZurik Plug Valves and were observed to be in good condition along with the rest of the discharge piping. Photo 3-6 shows the RAS/WAS Pumps conditions at the wastewater treatment facilities. Photo 3-6 RAS / WAS Pumps 3.5.5.6 Deep Injection Well Pump Station Effluent is disposed of to the onsite DIW through the transfer pump station. Figure 3-20 shows the location of the injection well pump station at the FGUA site. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.39 Figure 3-20 Injection Well Pump Station Location at WWTF The pump station consisted of four (4) 60 HP 3 phase 460-volt vertical turbine pumps with Mader electric motors which appeared to be operating at 35 psi. All four pumps were in fair condition. The concrete pedestals on one of the pumps was in poor condition and was falling apart. The exterior concrete for the wetwell was in much better condition and visually appeared good. All instrumentation and controls appeared to be in very good condition. The plug and check valves and discharge piping appeared to be in good condition. Photo 3-7 shows the conditions of the effluent pumps at the wastewater treatment facilities. Photo 3-7 Effluent Pumps 3.5.5.7 Accessory Structures The accessory structures include the blower and generator building, administrative building, and diesel fuel storage tank. Figure 3-21 illustrates the location of these accessory structures within the wastewater treatment facilities. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.40 Figure 3-21 Accessory Structures Locations at WWTF There are three blowers and a generator that are housed in a metal fabricated building. As mentioned in previous sections, two (2) new Neuros blowers are to be delivered to the site by the end of the second week of June and will replace Blowers #1 and #2. Staff indicated Blower #3 is going to stay onsite as a backup, and was observed to be operating during the site visit. The wastewater treatment generator is a 200kW Cummins diesel. Based on discussions with plant staff, the generator may be sized to maintain critical systems, but not the entire plant. Stantec staff was unable to get access to the generator during the site visit. There is also a portion of this building which was used for storage of materials and tools. Photo 3-8 shows the accessory building storage area. Photo 3-8 Accessory Building Storage Area TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.41 Next to this accessory building is the diesel fuel storage tank, refer to Photo 3-9. The tank capacity is 2,000 gallons and was within a concrete secondary containment tank. The exterior of the containment tank appeared in good condition however the interior was holding water and debris so the floor could not be evaluated. There was also a stairwell and platform for tank filling which was in good visual condition. The administrative building is the location of the facility office, SCADA screens, break room, bathroom, and laboratory. Photo 3-10 shows interior portions of the administration building. The building’s exterior and interior appeared in good condition at the time of the visit. Photo 3-9 Fuel Storage Tank Photo 3-10 Administration Building TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.42 3.5.5.8 Deep Injection and Monitoring Wells Effluent is disposed of through the onsite DIW well. Figure 3-22 below illustrates the location of the DIW within the wastewater treatment facilities. The DIW Maximum Disposal Rate (MDR) is 3,495 gallons per minute (GPM), or 5.03 million gallons per day (MGD). The permitted Maximum Injection Pressure is 103 pounds per square inch (psi) Figure 3-22 Deep Injection and Monitoring Wells Locations The DIW system appeared to be in very good condition. The well head was within a concrete containment tank. The containment tank walls and floor appeared in good condition as well. The injection site contained a panel with two (2) analog pressure gauges and two (2) electronic pressure indicating transmitters (PIT). Some of the steel fittings showed initial signs of corrosion and rust. The monitoring well site did not appear in as good as condition as the DIW site. The containment floor was holding water and visual crack was observed across the interior floor. The pump and pipe mounting also showed significant corrosion. Photo 3-11 shows the Deep Injection Well conditions while Photo 3-12 shows the Monitoring well conditions. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.43 Photo 3-11 Direct Injection Well Photo 3-12 Monitoring Wells 3.5.5.9 Rapid Infiltration Basins (RIBs) There are four (4) RIBs, also called percolation ponds, at the site. Figure 3-23 below illustrates the location of the percolation ponds within the site. Photo 3-13 shows the conditions of one of the ponds at the time of the site visit. During the site visit the USWSC staff informed the percolation ponds were very rarely used. The ponds appeared recently graded however there was vegetative growth within them. Based on observations of the soil, the ponds did not appear to have been used any time recently. No data TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.44 was available regarding percolation pond loading. Should continued use of the percolation ponds be considered, loading analysis should be conducted. Figure 3-23 Percolation Ponds Location at WWTF Photo 3-13 Percolation Pond 3.5.5.10 Lift Stations As part of the Stantec field investigations, ten (10) of the existing lift stations were observed. The majority of the stations have new control panels designed by Staycon, mounted on unistrut legs. Some of the stations that had panels mounted on posts. There was also a mixture of stations with below grade valve vaults and stations with piping and valving above grade. The stations observed without valve vaults were comprised of ductile iron piped through the wetwell to the above grade valves. Only some of the stations were located within a secured chain-link fence with the rest of the stations possessing locks on the wells, vaults, and panels. All FGUA owned stations observed had a master manhole before the lift station. USWSC staff informed Stantec that the lift station pumps were a mixture of Flygt and ABS. A few of the stations were located in the right-of-way in front of houses in such a way that there could be access issues. Other issues TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.45 observed and indicated by USWSC staff dealt with landscaping in or around the stations causing multiple problems including telemetry miscommunications. Maintenance staff onsite at one of the stations was removing a mop head from a clogged pump during the field visit. Photo 3-14 Existing Lift Station 3.5.6 Maintenance and Capital Projects The approved FGUA Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for FY 2017-FY 2022 (Appendix C) assigns funds for improvements to the following three (3) Wastewater projects in the five (5) year window of the CIP: • Collection System Improvements (Estimated Project Cost $1,414,906): These funds may be used to reduce I&I, repair or upgrade lift stations, rehabilitate manholes, replace force mains, gravity mains and laterals, and repair collection system breaks. • Wastewater Treatment Facility (Estimated Project Cost $605,561): These funds may be used for necessary upgrades and improvements to the wastewater treatment facilities. Facility improvements may include process modifications, equipment repairs and replacement, and facility upgrades. Other improvements may be done as necessary. • Wastewater Package Plant No. 1 Rehabilitation (Estimated Project Cost $1,102,054): The rehabilitation includes improvements to aeration, influent structure, clarifiers, clarifier launder, rubber, skimmer flap, walkways and structures, steal blast cleaning and replacement, and complete cleaning of the tank. 3.5.7 Wastewater Asset Evaluation Summary and Recommendations Based on the preliminary review of the FGUA permits, historical flows, field assessments, and discussions with staff, the following provides an initial assessment of the wastewater facilities as well as recommendations for improvements to continue to provide wastewater service to the existing FGUA customers. FGUA currently provides wastewater treatment to approximately 2,274 customers which results in approximately 1.1 MGD of wastewater treated annually and 1.4 MGD treated on a maximum TMADF basis, based on 2016 flows. This is approximately 78% of the permitted annual average TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.46 treatment capacity. FGUA provides wastewater treatment to approximately 60% of the occupied parcels within the service area. Expansion of the collection and conveyance system is limited to new development, which has been limited. Therefore, FGUA currently does not have any plans to expand the existing customer base. The unit processes associated with the WWTF were evaluated during two (2) site visits. Table 3-17 provides a summary of the assessment of the treatment units. An assessment of good, fair, and poor was given and is defined as follows: Good - Unit is in working order and no improvements or maintenance appears to be needed to maintain service to existing customers Fair - Unit is in working order, further investigations and/or maintenance may be required to maintain service to existing customers. Poor – Unit has operational issues and/or improvements are needed to maintain service to existing customers. In addition to assessing the condition of the various treatment units, general recommendations were made for each unit. The following types of recommendations are provided for each of the treatment units evaluated: • Improvements are recommended to maintain current service to existing customers. This also includes further evaluations and investigations that may be warranted. • Routine maintenance is required • Potential Long-Term Improvement may be needed to maintain current service to existing customers. Table 3-17 provides a summary of the condition assessment and recommended improvements associated with each of the major wastewater treatment components. Table 3-17 Wastewater Treatment Facilities Conditions Assessment Unit/Process Condition Recommended Improvement Recommended Maintenance Potential Long- term Improvement Headworks Fair Replace hatches, install additional handrails Corrosion repair Package Plant #1 Good Package Plant #2 Good Corrosion repair Blowers Good Digester Good Corrosion repair RAS/WAS Pump Station and PD Blowers Good Good DIW Pump Station Fair Pump mount repairs, corrosion repair, TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.47 Table 3-17 Wastewater Treatment Facilities Conditions Assessment Unit/Process Condition Recommended Improvement Recommended Maintenance Potential Long- term Improvement paint and coat pipe Deep Injection Well Fair Assess hydraulic connection between aquifers Corrosion repair Ponds Fair Conduct loading analysis to determine if long term use of ponds feasible Generator Fair Evaluate capacity of generator Limited investigations were performed on the wastewater collection and conveyance system. The control panels were recently updated; however, conversations with staff indicate that there may be some limitations with the existing telemetry system. Pumps and wet well linings were not evaluated; however, it is expected that pump station rehabilitations will be required for long term use. The County may wish to refurbish pump stations to meet the Collier County standards for pump stations and SCADA systems. Based on the age of the system and difficulties associated with repairing the linear infrastructure due to the complications of rock excavation, it is recommended that an asset management program for sewers, manholes, force mains, and air release valves be developed that identifies infrastructure to be rehabilitated and or replaced based on age, criticality, and known deficiencies. In general, the WWTF and collection system are in good condition and limited improvements are needed to maintain wastewater service to existing customers. With the recent improvements at the WWTF, limited further improvements are needed. The approved CIP for 2017-2021 has budgeted approximately $100,000 annually for necessary upgrades and improvements. FGUA indicated that there is a sewer rehabilitation program including sewer and manhole lining, however little or no effort has been made to prioritize rehabilitation efforts. The approved CIP for 2017-2021 has budgeted approximately $200,000 - $300,000 per year for collection system improvements which includes: • Replacement of force mains, gravity mains, and laterals • Rehabilitation of manholes • Infiltration/Inflow reduction • Repair and upgrade lift stations • Repair collection system breaks It is recommended that an evaluation of the collection and conveyance system be performed to prioritize the use of the funds for collection system improvements. Based on the limited observations, it is likely that the budgeted $200,000 - $300,000 annually on collection system improvements may be adequate for long term operation. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.48 3.6 WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM 3.6.1 Water Supply The FGUA Golden Gate City Water Distribution System map is shown on Figure 3-24. The water distribution system consists of roughly 249,000 linear feet (LF) of pressurized pipe, ranging in size from 2-inches up to 16-inches in diameter. The system also includes a water distribution booster pump station located on Green Boulevard, which is at the northernmost part of the system. Much of the distribution system is AC pipe and no details were provided to quantity or percentage of the system this includes. The distribution system also contains a number of manual air release valves and system valves which are checked and exercised annually. USWSC’s valve exercising program generally is split into six month cycles where valves are checked and exercised within the first six (6) months and any necessary replacements are done the following six months. The FGUA WTF also has eight (8) supply wells on site. Three (3) additional wells were permitted but not yet constructed. After reviewing the South Florida Water Management District Water Use Permit, it appears that one (1) of the wells has been abandoned as well pumping reports do not show any recent activity. There is also a 6-inch interconnection shown as Photo 3-15 with the 36-inch City of Naples raw water main which runs along the south side of Golden Gate Parkway from the City of Naples Well Fields to the east. The interconnect is capable of serving as an emergency source of raw water to the WTF. There is no record of the interconnect being used at this time. The connection requires a portable pump to provide sufficient pressure to deliver the water to the aerator elevation at the City of Naples plant. An agreement between the City of Naples and FGUA or its predecessor Florida Cities Water Company has not been found. During the Stantec site visit the assembly was identified and discussed. FGUA staff confirmed a pressure test and flow test should be completed before use. FGUA did not have any plans to do this testing at this time. 3.6.1.1 Water Distribution System As stated in the previous section the water distribution system consists of a range in size of piping. This majority of the distribution system located in Quadrant 1, which is the Northeast section of the active service area. There are a few pipes that also distribute water to the commercial areas along Golden Gate Parkway. A portion of the distribution system includes dead ends, however USWSC staff informed there are a number of auto blow offs and a flushing program exists and is typically done monthly unless informed by the local fire department of immediate issues. While on site, USWCS staff discussed the system in more detail with Stantec. The system typically runs at 55-62 psi. There are times when the system reaches capacity and plant staff will drop pressure in the system 5 psi until the storage at the plant can recover. G!.G!.G!.G!.G!. G!.G!.G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!.G!.G!. G!.G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!.G!.G!. G!. G!.G!.G!.G!.G!.G!.G!.G!. G!.G!.G!.G!. G!. G!.G!.G!. G!.G!.G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!.G!.G!. G!. G!.G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!.G!.G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!.G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!.G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!.G!.G!.G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!.G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!.G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!.G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!.G!.G!.G!. G!.G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!.G!.G!. G!. G!.G!.G!.G!.G!. G!.G!. G!.G!.G!. G!. G!.G!.G!.G!. G!. G!.G!.G!.G!.G!.G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!.G!.G!. G!. G!. G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. G!. G!.G!.G!. G!. G!.G!. G!. §¨¦SANTA BARBARA BLVD") GREEN BLVD HUNTER BLVDSUNSHINE BLVDTROPICANA BLVDSU N S E T R D §¨¦ ")GOLDEN GATE PKWYStantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 tel 239.649.4040 fax 239.263.6449 Figure 3-24 FGUA Existing Potable Water Distribution Map June 2017 0 650 1,300 Feet ($$¯\\US1226-F01\U:\177311018\gis\mxd\Figure3-24_FGUA_WaterDistribution_20170609_v02_103504.mxd Revised: 2017-06-09 By: cbernerDisclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. L E G E N D G!.Hydrant Water Main FGUA Service Area Golden Gate Water Treatment Facility 1.0 mgd Water Booster Station Prepared by:C.J.B. 06/09/17 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.50 Photo 3-15 6-inch Raw Water Interconnection The distribution system includes an 815,930-gallon storage tank located at the water booster pump station. The control of the booster station is limited and works through the plants SCADA system via level monitoring. The filling and pumping of this station is also limited, as there is one pipe for both influent and discharge flows, meaning the tank can either be filled or the pumps can be pumping into the system. Table 3-18 contains a breakdown of system asset quantities based on FGUA’s GIS database which has been provided to Collier County. Table 3-18 Water Distribution System Feature Length(LF)/Quantity Water (2-inch) 15,527 Water (3 -inch) 306 Water (4-inch) 13,315 Water (6-inch) 65,050 Water (8-inch) 115,272 Water (10-inch) 32,814 Water (12-inch) 4,158 Water (14-inch) 1,867 Water (16-inch) 196 Air Release Valve 37 Valve 400 As mentioned in the previous section in regard to the wastewater conveyance system, there are also issues with the caprock and poorly installed piping which leads to many main breaks within the system. These breaks place a heavy load on the plant and cause difficulty when trying to TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.51 locate as well as being expensive to fix. Currently when a break is identified, USWSC requires jackhammers to excavate the area, the AC pipe is removed and disposed of by certified personnel, and the section of broken main is replaced with PVC. The distribution system does include a number of fire hydrants which are included in an approved FDEP sampling and flushing plan. The overall coverage of hydrants however is very limited and a large portion of the service area is not covered, which presents a potential public safety issue with limited fire protection. 3.6.2 Water Treatment Facility The Golden Gate WTF was constructed in 1989 as two (2) lime softening package plants. The Water Treatment Facility site plan is shown on Figure 3-25. One of the original lime softening plants, located on the eastern portion of the site has been decommissioned as the steel tank had rusted completely through to the concrete slabs. The two sludge holding tanks remain in operation. In 2000, a reverse osmosis (RO) plant was added to the site and the current water for distribution is a blend of the two plants’ effluent. The two lime softening plants are rated at 1.244 MGD and the RO plant is rated at 0.875 MGD with the potential for expansion to 1.125 MGD (following Phase IV expansion). The total plant capacity is 2.119 MGD with the potential to expand to 2.357 MGD. The plant site also includes a 0.5 MG ground storage tank for finished potable water, which was recently replaced with a CROM tank. USWSC informed Stantec the plant typically operates at 1.78 MGD. Figure 3-26 illustrates an approximate Process Flow Schematic of the Golden Gate Water Treatment Facility. This schematic was based on discussions with staff at the site visit. Currently, the plant has two (2) treatment trains for production of potable water and raw water is blended with RO water to meet demand. Additional information on each train is as follows: 1. Lime Softening: the current plant is permitted for 550 GPM, however the USWSC operator indicated the plant cannot produce more that 320-340 GPM. The lime softening portion also includes three (3) sand filters. The process does not include the addition of any alum. 2. Reverse Osmosis: the RO plant was upgraded in 2013 to increase production but not the overall plant’s capacity. The current plant’s targeted production is 480 GPM . The membrane elements consist of 4 square feet of surface area each. 3. Raw water blend: this train is a blend of raw water with RO treated water. The current target for production is 250 GPM. The WTF has two (2) chemical injection points. The first is an above ground assembly just east of the lime softening plant. The second is above ground assembly next to the ground storage tank. Chlorine (liquid bleach) and fluoride are injected at the first point. The second injection point includes, chlorine, fluoride, liquid ammonium sulfate and caustic. All the water produced is disinfected with chlorine. The plant uses liquid bleach between 11- 11.5%, which is injected into the water at two separate injection points. Fluoride is also injected at both points. Caustic is a recent addition to boost the pH of the water to counteract a higher level TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.52 of copper within the plant’s effluent. With the addition of these chemical the plant currently achieves 4-log virus removal. All plant operations and booster stations are monitored with the onsite CitectSCADA system, as shown on Photo 3-16. Photo 3-16 WTF CitectSCADA System 3.6.3 Water Treatment Facility Permit Requirements FGUA is authorized under the South Florida Water Management District Water Use Permit number 11-00148-W issued March 1, 2010 and expires on March 10, 2030. The permit is for the use of groundwater from the Lower Tamiami Aquifer and Water Table Aquifer for public water supply use with an annual allocation of 908.9 MG and a maximum month of 81 MG. The specific aquifer allocations are listed below in Table 3-19. Table 3-19 Permitted Aquifer Use Allocations Aquifer Annual (MG) Maximum Month (MG) Water Table 752 62.24 Lower Tamiami 495 41.25 N FIGURE Title Project No. Client/Project \\us1226-f01\workgroup\1773\active\177311018\drawing\set01\active\civil\exhibit\11018_C-WTP-FIG-1-update.dwg2017/06/09 11:36 AM By: Laterza, Mikewww.stantec.com Florida Certificate No. 27013 Stantec Consulting Ltd. 239.649.4040 Naples, Florida 34108 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. #300 COLLIER COUNTY FGUA GOLDEN GATE CITY WATER TREATMENT PLANT SITE PLAN 177311018 3-25 RO PLANT TUA (LIME SOFTENING) (300 GPM) TUB (RAW WATER BLEND) WELLS (8 ONSITE)FILTERS RO1 (480 GPM) RO2 (250 GPM) INJECTION POINT 1 Cl F INJECTION POINT 2 Cl F LAS CAUSTIC 4-LOG VIRUS REMOVAL GST 0.5 MG DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FIGURE Title Project No. Client/Project \\us1226-f01\workgroup\1773\active\177311018\drawing\set01\active\general\exhibit\11018-G-0X3.dwg2017/06/09 11:20 AM By: Laterza, Mikewww.stantec.com Florida Certificate No. 27013 Stantec Consulting Ltd. 239.649.4040 Naples, Florida 34108 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. #300 COLLIER COUNTY FGUA GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC 177311018 3-26 NOTE: SCHEMATIC DEVELOPED BASED ON SITE VISIT 06-05-2017. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.55 The permitted raw water wells are listed in Table 3-20, including the well ID, well diameter, depth of the well, flow from the well, and depth of well casing. Table 3-20 Production Wells Summary PRODUCTION WELLS GG- 1 GG- 2A GG- 3 GG- 4 GG- 5 GG- 8 GG- 9A GG- 10 GG- 11 GG- 12 GG- 13 GG- 14 Existing (E)/Proposed (P) E E E E E E E E E P P P Well Diameter (in) 6 8 6 8 8 8 14 8 8 10 10 10 Cased Depth (ft) 15 15 35 35 15 15 8.5 11.6 15 80 80 141 Total Depth (ft) 22 22 45 45 22 22 33 22 25 180 180 200 Pump Capacity (GPM) 200 200 160 200 250 250 200 200 200 810 810 200 Listed Aquifer (WTA or LTA) WT A WTA WTA WTA WTA WTA WTA WTA WTA LTA LTA LTA WTA = Water Table Aquifer LTA = Lower Tamiami Aquifer *Wells 12, 13, and 14 are listed in permit as existing, but has not been constructed. 3.6.3.1 Monitoring Requirements The Water Use Permit requires the following monitoring and reporting requirements be submitted to the SFWMD: • Pursuant to Limiting Condition 17, every five years from the date of calibration of each facility, the Permittee shall submit re-calibration data for each of the water accounting facilities. • Pursuant to Limiting Condition 18, monthly withdrawals for each withdrawal facility shall be submitted to the District quarterly. • Pursuant to Limiting Condition 20, the Permittee shall determine unaccounted-for distribution system losses beginning within six months of Permit issuance and report the losses to the District annually. • Pursuant to Limiting Condition 23, every five years from the date of permit issuance, the permittee shall submit a water conservation plan for review and approval by District Staff, which addresses the results of a water conservation audit that documents the efficiency of water use on the project site using data produced from an on-site evaluation conducted and a comparison of the permitted allocation and the allocation that would apply to the project based on current District allocation rules and updated population and per capita use rates. • Pursuant to Limiting Condition 27, the ongoing saline water monitoring program require monthly data collection and quarterly data submission of: TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.56 o 1) Water levels measured at Monitor Wells A through G (measured immediately prior to any sampling). o 2) Water quality analyses for conductivity and chloride concentration of water from Monitor Wells A through G; the wells will be purged by pumping prior to obtaining a water sample. o 3) Water quality analyses for conductivity and chloride concentration of water from the Lower Tamiami Aquifer production wells; the wells will be purged by pumping (using the permanent well pump) prior to obtaining a water sample. • Pursuant to Limiting Condition 28, every five years from the date of issuance the Permittee shall submit a water use compliance report. • Alternative Water Supply and Water Conservation Plan: In accordance with Section 2.6.1 of the BOR, all public water supply utilities applying for an Individual Permit are required to develop and implement a water conservation plan. The water conservation elements are described in Exhibit 16. Table 3-21 Monitoring Wells Summary MONITOR WELLS MW-A MW-B MW-C MW-D MW-E MW-F MW-G Existing (E)/Proposed (P) E E E E E E E Well Diameter (in) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Cased Depth (ft) 19 42 62 98 50 57 230 Total Depth (ft) 22 45 65 101 52 60 240 Listed Aquifer (WTA or LTA) WTA WTA LTA LTA LTA LTA SSA WTA = Water Table Aquifer / LTA = Lower Tamiami Aquifer / SSA = Sandstone Aquifer 3.6.4 Historical Flows The historical raw water pumped and the total water billed for the years 2015 and 2016 are listed in Table 3-22, as provided in each year’s Public Supply Annual Report (PSAR). The PSAR also lists the billed water allocation and plant use and losses to determine the amount of unaccounted for water in the system. Table 3-23 lists the unbilled uses of water and Table 3-24 lists the total water used and unaccounted for water. Table 3-22 2015 and 2016 Raw Water and Treated Water Summary Mon-Yr. Total Raw Water Pumped (gallons) Total Treated Water Billed (gallons) Jan-15 56,740,000 35,445,000 Feb-15 50,453,000 31,452,000 Mar-15 59,111,000 39,557,000 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.57 Table 3-22 2015 and 2016 Raw Water and Treated Water Summary Apr-15 56,701,000 39,136,000 May-15 54,704,000 33,733,000 Jun-15 51,251,000 36,022,000 Jul-15 51,948,000 32,266,000 Aug-15 55,068,000 36,077,000 Sep-15 50,416,000 33,244,000 Oct-15 57,975,000 32,416,000 Nov-15 50,884,000 33,874,000 Dec-15 57,744,000 34,217,000 Jan-16 55,160,000 35,841,000 Feb-16 53,362,000 33,193,000 Mar-16 58,447,000 32,579,000 Apr-16 54,909,000 37,325,000 May-16 56,722,000 37,068,000 Jun-16 50,539,000 33,126,000 Jul-16 49,619,000 33,353,000 Aug-16 49,284,000 33,500,000 Sep-16 51,172,000 33,515,000 Oct-16 51,088,000 35,330,000 Nov-16 50,935,000 33,782,000 Dec-16 49,022,000 33,720,000 2015 Total 652,995,000 417,439,000 2016 Total 630,259,000 412,332,000 2015 Avg. 54,416,250 34,786,583 2016 Avg. 52,521,583 34,361,000 Well Pumpage Data Withdrawals from the eight (8) wells were evaluated between January 2010 and March 2017 and a summary is provided below. o Average Monthly Total Pumpage = 50.57 million gallons (1.69 MGD) o Maximum Monthly Total Pumpage = 59.49 million gallons (1.98 MGD) o Minimum Monthly Total Pumpage = 42.08 million gallons (1.40 MGD) o No Occurrence of Exceeding Maximum Monthly Water Table Aquifer Allocation of 62.64 million gallons • Graphs of Well Pumpage Attached – Observed Pumping Trends 2010 - 2017: o Wells GG-1 – Decreasing trend from about 6 MGM to 2 MGM o Well GG-2A – Increasing trend from about 4 MGM to 7 MGM o Well GG-3 – Consistent trend of about 2 MGM o Well GG-4 – Consistent trend of about 2 MGM o Well GG-5 – Slight Increasing trend from about 4 MGM to 5 MGM o Well GG-8 – Consistent trend of about 8 MGM o Well GG-10 – Consistent trend of about 11.5 MGM o Well GG-11 – Increasing trend from about 12.0 MGM to 14.5 MGM A review of the ground water salinity data in 7 Monitoring Wells from October 2014 to March 2017was performed and a summary of the findings is as follows: TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.58 • No recent salinity data available for the production wells. • Monitoring well depths 22-ft; 45-feet; 52-ft; 60-ft; 65-ft; 101-ft; and 240-ft. • Salinity Data relatively constant with no significant trends up or down. • Based on monitoring data, the inferred 250 mg/l ISO-CHLOR depth (depth where dissolved chlorides are 250 mg/l or above) is at approximately 65 feet below grade. Withdrawals from the Water Table Aquifer have not exceeded SFWMD allocations. Average wellfield withdrawals are about 10 million gallons per month below permitted allocations. Increased use of wells may approach the source limitations of this aquifer. No Lower Tamiami Aquifer wells have been installed and allocations from this aquifer (495 million gallons per year and 41.25 million gallons per month) are available for expansion. Dissolved chloride concentrations in the Lower Tamiami Aquifer exceed 250 mg/l and are over 1,500 mg/l at a depth of about 100 feet below grade. Water used from this aquifer will require either blending or Reverse Osmosis treatment to meet drinking water standards. Site testing of existing wells is recommended to evaluate individual well yield. Two wells listed as “Water Table Aquifer” wells (GG-3 and GG-4) may be Lower Tamiami Aquifer wells and the Water Use Permit includes conflicting information regarding Aquifers. Considering that each aquifer is “source-limited” accurate determination of the aquifer the well taps may be important for compliance and planning purposes. A review of water usage and water losses was performed for 2015-2016. As mentioned by staff there is a relatively high volume of water lost due to breaks as well as a high volume of unaccounted water loss in the system. Monthly unaccounted for water loss can range from 10% - 20% which is excessive. Tables 3-23 and 3-24 provide a summary of raw water, treated water, unbilled water usage, and water loss for 2015 and 2016. Table 3-23 2015 and 2016 Summary of Total Water Usage and Accounted for (Gallons) Mon-Yr. Total Use Gallons Unaccounted Percentage Unaccounted Jan-15 45,744,725 10,995,275 19.38% Feb-15 40,281,340 10,171,660 20.16% Mar-15 50,270,325 8,840,675 14.96% Apr-15 50,525,935 6,175,065 10.89% May-15 43,492,465 11,211,535 20.49% Jun-15 45,493,930 5,757,070 11.23% Jul-15 42,018,060 9,929,940 19.12% Aug-15 47,375,995 7,692,005 13.97% Sep-15 41,331,080 9,084,920 18.02% Oct-15 45,092,630 12,882,370 22.22% TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.59 Table 3-23 2015 and 2016 Summary of Total Water Usage and Accounted for (Gallons) Nov-15 41,425,080 9,458,920 18.59% Dec-15 46,076,285 11,667,715 20.21% Jan-16 46,893,205 8,266,795 14.99% Feb-16 42,904,125 10,457,875 19.60% Mar-16 43,509,687 14,937,313 25.56% Apr-16 48,515,435 6,393,565 11.64% May-16 47,911,600 8,810,400 15.53% Jun-16 42,328,540 8,210,460 16.25% Jul-16 42,353,750 7,265,250 14.64% Aug-16 43,372,440 5,911,560 11.99% Sep-16 43,132,305 8,039,695 15.71% Oct-16 45,198,680 5,889,320 11.53% Nov-16 44,048,520 6,886,480 13.52% Dec-16 44,117,580 4,904,420 10.00% 2015 Total 539,127,850 113,867,150 21.12%- 2016 Total 534,285,867 95,973,133 17.96% 2015 Avg. 44,927,321 9,488,929 17.44% 2016 Avg. 44,523,822 7,997,761 15.08% Table 3-24 2015 and 2016 Summary of Unbilled Water Usage (Gallons) Mon-Yr. 0.5% Meter Error WTF Use WWTF Use RO Brine Concentrate Flushings & Maintenance Water Breaks Jan-15 886,125 34,200 569,200 7,742,000 1,047,290 20,910 Feb-15 786,300 49,020 491,200 6,589,000 823,370 90,450 Mar-15 988,925 27,190 599,300 8,368,000 559,910 170,000 Apr-15 978,400 41,500 642,400 8,900,000 709,060 118,575 May-15 843,325 41,340 588,100 6,754,000 877,500 655,200 Jun-15 900,550 41,580 648,300 6,892,000 989,500 0 Jul-15 806,650 54,580 578,600 7,206,000 1,031,230 75,000 Au g-15 901,925 40,250 577,000 8,872,000 907,820 0 Sep-15 831,100 35,080 622,700 5,004,000 1,394,200 200,000 Oct-15 810,400 35,110 646,700 10,377,000 779,100 28,320 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.60 Table 3-24 2015 and 2016 Summary of Unbilled Water Usage (Gallons) Nov-15 846,850 41,070 882,600 4,556,000 1,157,300 67,260 Dec-15 855,425 41,670 999,500 8,103,000 1,100,850 758,840 Jan-16 896,025 42,600 1,076,700 7,907,000 1,055,000 74,880 Feb-16 829,825 40,580 607,000 7,229,000 991,520 13,200 Mar-16 814,475 42,572 723,800 8,217,000 1,033,480 99,360 Apr-16 933,125 38,470 684,000 7,937,000 966,400 631,440 May-16 926,700 47,540 564,000 7,946,000 828,000 531,360 Jun-16 828,150 51,620 537,000 5,729,000 1,507,410 549,360 Jul-16 833,825 51,250 519,000 5,841,000 1,351,035 404,640 Aug-16 837,500 48,120 591,000 6,496,000 852,300 1,047,520 Sep-16 837,875 36,510 601,000 7,229,000 757,400 155,520 Oct-16 883,250 56,130 691,300 7,306,000 846,800 85,200 Nov-16 844,550 56,130 642,000 7,701,000 914,600 108,240 Dec-16 843,000 47,020 929,300 7,762,000 584,900 231,360 2015 Total 10,435,975 482,590 7,845,600 89,363,000 11,377,130 2,184,555 2016 Total 10,308,300 558,542 8,166,100 87,300,000 11,688,845 3,932,080 2015 Avg. 869,665 40,216 653,800 7,446,917 948,094 182,046 2016 Avg. 859,025 46,545 680,508 7,275,000 974,070 327,673 3.6.5 Water Treatment Facility Field Investigations A limited visual inspection was performed by Stantec staff while onsite at the FGUA WTF plant on May 30, 2017. The section below includes a summary of the reported conditions. The discussion is organized by process as follows: 1. Lime Softening plant 2. Ground storage tank 3. Reverse Osmosis membrane plant 4. Decommissioned Lime Softening plant 5. Sludge holding tanks 6. High service pumps 7. Accessory structures 8. Chemical storage and injection points 9. Wells TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.61 3.6.5.1 Lime Softening Plant The original treatment plant included two (2) Lime softening package plants one of which is still in operation. This lime softening treatment includes the aerator, clarifier, lime slaker, three (3) filter tanks, filter backwash tank, and backwash holding tank, as seen in Figure 3-27. Figure 3-27 Lime Softening Plant Location at WTF Site This portion of the plant was down during the Stantec field investigations, which occurred while the slaker was being worked on by USWSC staff. The repairs on the slaker include replacement of the gear reducer as well as full replacement of the feeding apparatus. Due to age the schedule 40 PVC piping under the grit system is being replaced. The repairs are anticipated to be completed by June 7, 2017. USWSC staff informed Stantec field staff that many of the issues with the old decommissioned lime softening plant also exist on the current plant which includes rusting within the steel tanks. This rusting was observed on the clarifier and the aerator from the ground. Stantec staff did not climb the stairs to the top of the clarifier for observation due to safety concerns. The three (3) filters incorporate a sand media for filtration. USWSC staff informed Stantec the filter media is currently being replaced every three (3) months due to the high pH of operation. The filter media has to be jackhammered out during this replacement as a result of the impact of the pH. Photo 3-17 illustrates the various portion of the lime softening plant including the slaker tower, filter, and backwash holding tank. Rust was observed on each of the steel tanks. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.62 Photo 3-17: Lime softening Steel tanks The backwash components of the lime softening were observed to be in poor condition as well. The concrete tank had large buildups of material within it and much of the piping was rusted. The backwash tank also exhibited a few rust issues. Photo 3-18: Lime Softening Backwash 3.6.5.2 Ground Storage Tank The WTF originally included a steel ground storage tank which has been replaced with a CROM concrete tank. The current tank has a 0.5 MG storage capacity and appeared to be in very good condition. The tank level is controlled via the plants SCADA system. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.63 Figure 3-28 Ground Storage Tank Location Photo 3-19 Water Ground Storage Tank 3.6.5.3 Reverse Osmosis Membrane Plant The Reverse Osmosis (RO) membrane plant consists of two trains, one train is distributed directly into the system supply and the second blends with raw water. Figure 3-29 illustrates the location of the RO Membrane Plant within the WTF site while Photo 3-20 shows a photograph of RO system. The membrane plant was operational at the time of the Stantec field visit, however it was discovered the USWSC staff was replacing membrane cartridge filters due to iron fouling. Photo 3- 21 shows a wheelbarrow containing fouled filters. USWSC staff believes that one of the onsite wells had collapsed which was causing the issues. Staff indicated a well contractor was being TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.64 contacted and had been slated to video the wells during the second week of June. In general, there were no other issues observed with the RO plant. The membranes are housed in a fabricated metal building which also appeared to be in good condition. Figure 3-29 RO Membrane Plant Location at WTF Site The wells currently used as part of the potable water supply are mainly within the Water Table Aquifer. This aquifer commonly has elevated concentrations of reduced (dissolved) iron that result in iron fouling when the groundwater is exposed to the atmosphere and the iron oxidizes. The buildup seen on the RO membrane cartridge filters illustrate the dark reddish color which is typical of iron oxide. The continued use of Water Table Aquifer wells will require a maintenance plan or pre-treatment to address iron fouling of the system. Photo 3-20 RO system TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.65 Photo 3-21 Fouled RO Cartridge Filters 3.6.5.4 Decommissioned Lime Softening Plant As mentioned in the previous sections the WTF was originally two (2) package plants. One has since been decommissioned. USWSC indicated both the filters and clarifier portion of the tank had rusted completely through to the concrete foundation. It does not appear any portion of this plant can be salvaged. Figure 3-30 Location of the Decommissioned Lime Softening Plant TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.66 Photo 3-22 Decommissioned Plant 3.6.5.5 Lime Sludge Holding Tanks Currently the sludge holding tanks which were in part of both plants are the only portion still in operation. The tanks are steel and exhibit rust as much of the plant does. Lime sludge generated is stored in the tanks for disposal. Tanker trucks remove the lime sludge weekly which is disposed of by Karle Enviro Organic Recycling. Typically, the trucks remove 6,000 gallons of lime sludge and it is deposited on one of the cattle pasture parcels owned by Karle Enviro Organic Recycling. There are two parcels located in Lee County and one located in Hendry County. Figure 3-31 Location of the Sludge Holding Tanks TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.67 Photo 3-23 Lime Sludge Holding Tanks 3.6.5.6 High Service Pumps The water distribution system is served by four (4) high service pumps located at the treatment plant. The four pumps are 40 HP, 3 phase, 230/460 volt, 60 HZ pumps. Pumps #1 and #2 are controlled by VFDs. Pumps #1, #2, and #3 motors were recently serviced. USWSC staff indicated repairs were completed by Cornell Balancing located in Fort Myers, Florida. Pump #4 exhibited exterior rust and was slated for the next repair cycle. Figure 3-32 High Service Pumps Location TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.68 Photo 3-24 High service Pumps 3.6.5.7 Accessory Structures Four (4) accessory structures located are on the WTF site. The largest building is the administration building which was the location of the plant office, laboratory, MCC and electrical room, as well as the 320Kw backup diesel generator. The exterior and interior of the building including the office and laboratory appeared in good condition. The MCC and electrical controls all appeared to be in very good condition as well did the backup diesel generator. The other three (3) accessory structures included the diesel fuel storage tank, chemical storage building, and storage building. The diesel fuel storage tank and access stairway appear in good condition. The chemical storage is housed in a concrete structure. This building did not appear to have any visual structural issues and appeared in good condition. The site storage building is a metal pre-fabricated building which also appeared to be in good condition. Figure 3-33 Accessory Structures Locations at WTF site TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.69 Photo 3-25 Accessory Building Photo 3-26 Storage Building 3.6.5.8 Chemical Storage and Injection points There were two (2) additional storage buildings located at the plant site. One was located directly across from the high service pumps between the ground storage tank and clarifier. Liquid Ammonium sulfate and sodium hypochlorite is housed at this area. The second storage is a small building located to the east of the clarifier where fluoride is housed. Both of these storage facilities are in good condition. The chemicals from these storage areas are injected at two (2) points within the plant. Injection point #1 is located at the above grade piping assembly located next to the backwash holding tank. Sodium hypochlorite and Fluoride are injected at this point. The second injection point is located next to the ground storage tank, which includes sodium hypochlorite, fluoride, liquid ammonium sulfate and caustic. This injection area has a small monitoring area which has various readings for staff. The two injection points are in very good condition. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.70 Figure 3-34 Chemical Storage and Injection Points Locations Photo 3-27 Injection Points 3.6.5.9 Water Production Wells As stated in earlier sections of this report there are eight (8) wells onsite. All above grade features of these wells appear in be in very good condition including the valves, piping, and flowmeters. All wells were contained within fenced areas which were locked. As mentioned USWSC staff believes one of the wells has collapsed based on the issues currently occurring with the RO membrane filters. The staff anticipated knowing the status of this by the second week of June. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.71 Figure 3-35 Wells Locations Photo 3-28 Typical Well Installation at WTF Site 3.6.6 Water Treatment Facility Maintenance and Capital Projects The approved Capital Improvement Program for FY 2017-FY 2022 (Appendix C) assigns funds for improvements to the following three Water projects in the five-year window of the CIP. • Water Treatment Facility Improvements (Estimated Project Cost $796,409): These funds may be used for necessary upgrades and improvements to the water treatment facilities. Facility improvements may include process modifications, equipment repairs and replacement and facility upgrades. • Distribution System Improvements (Estimated Project Cost $236,702): These funds may be used to for various water distribution improvements including repair or replacement of fire hydrants, valves and water mains. These funds may also be used to loop dead end mains or to extend water mains to portions of the service area not currently served. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.72 • Water Meter Replacement (Estimated Project Cost $141,737): The FGUA has instituted a program by which aged meters are replaced at a frequency depending on the age and volume through the meter. The 5/8" and 3/4" meters are replaced at ten years of age. Larger meters are replaced more frequently. This serves to maintain accurate water usage data for appropriate customer billing and reporting to the water management districts. • Water Treatment Facility Install RO (Estimated Project Cost $1,280,552): This project will enlarge the existing RO train to produce finished water with a capacity that replaces the existing lime softening treatment unit, which will be decommissioned. These funds are necessary for upgrades and improvements to the water treatment facility. The existing lime softening unit will be replaced with an RO system to greatly improve water quality. Increasing the treatment capacity of the existing RO system is more cost effective than rehabilitating the lime softening unit. • Water Treatment Plant Capacity (Estimated Project Cost $616,050): These funds may be used to design, permit and construct additional raw water wells to supply the Golden Gate WTF. This project is necessary to ensure adequate raw water supply which may be required if the WTF is expanded or TUA is converted to RO. Emergency Water Interconnect (Estimated Project Cost $55,500): These funds may be utilized to construct the upgrades necessary to utilize the City of Naples raw water interconnect without use of a portable pump. 3.6.7 Water Asset Evaluation Summary and Recommendations Based on the preliminary review of the FGUA permits, historical flows, field assessments, and discussions with staff the following provides an initial assessment of the water facilities as well as recommendations for improvements to continue to provide water service to the existing FGUA customers. FGUA currently provides potable water service to approximately 3640 customers. In 2015 and 2016, FGUA provided 412.3 MG of potable water to its customers which is equivalent to 1.1 MGD of potable water delivered. The withdrawal of raw water for the corresponding year and was 630.3 MG, which is approximately 70% of the permitted allocation rate of 909 MG. The WTF consists of three (3) different treatment trains including a lime softening plant, an RO plant, with a portion of the raw water blended with the treated water from the RO plant prior to being sent to the distribution system. The overall potable water system efficiency is approximately 65%. Typically, potable water treatment recovery rates for brackish water with an RO plant is 75%-80% and the treatment recovery for a freshwater plant is approximately 90%. Based on the review of well pumpage data and water production data, the WTF has an inefficient recovery rate which is then compounded by water main breaks and unaccounted losses within the system. There currently are 8 shallow production wells that pull water out of the Water Table Aquifer. A review of the well pumpage data for the period of January 2010 through January 2017 indicates that the wells have not reduced in yield over time. However, operations staff has indicated that TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.73 one well has recently collapsed, which can result over time. Little is known regarding the maintenance of the wells at this point in time. Staff has indicated that recently, there has been frequent fouling of the RO membranes. While this can be a result of the one failed well causing increased sediment and particulates within the raw water, it also can be a result of iron precipitant within the wells. High iron concentrations are a characteristic of the shallow wells. RO treatment may not be the appropriate process for treatment of the raw water supply for this reason, or pre- treatment for iron removal may be needed. Lime softening may be a more appropriate treatment process for ground water from the Water Table Aquifer. The existing lime softening facility is in poor condition and further evaluation of the structural integrity of the existing tankage is required. As mentioned, Stantec staff did not investigate the tanks due to safety concerns. Additionally, staff has indicated that the treatment performance of the lime softening plant is limited as well. The lime softening plant has a capacity to treat 500 GPM, however staff indicated that treatment beyond 300 GPM is not feasible. The unit processes associated with the WTF were evaluated during two (2) site visits. Table- 25 provides a summary of the assessment of the treatment units. An assessment of good, fair, and poor was given and is defined as follows: Good - Unit is in working order and no improvements or maintenance appears to be needed to maintain service to existing customers Fair - Unit is in working order, further investigations and/or maintenance may be required to maintain service to existing customers. Poor – Unit has operational issues and/or improvements are needed to maintain service to existing customers. In addition to assessing the condition of the various treatment units, general recommendations were made for each unit. The following types recommendations are provided for each of the treatment units evaluated: • Improvements are recommended to maintain current service to existing customers. This also includes further evaluations and investigations that may be warranted. • Routine maintenance is required • Potential Long-Term Improvement may be needed to maintain current service to existing customers. Table 3-25 provides a summary of the condition assessment and recommended improvements associated with each of the major water treatment components. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.74 Table 3-25 Water Treatment Facility Condition Assessment Unit/Process Condition Recommended Improvement Recommended Maintenance Potential Long- term Improvement Water Supply Wells Fair Perform detailed evaluation of well performance to determine supply reliability Develop additional wells Lime Softening Poor Evaluate structural integrity and condition of steel tanks, identify refurbishment/ replacement, and useful life of existing facility Major refurbishment/ replacement RO Plant Good Ground Storage Tank Good Lime Sludge Holding Tanks Good Corrosion repairs Chemical Storage Good High Service Pumps Good Corrosion repair A preliminary investigation of the potable water distribution system was performed. In general discussions with staff have indicated that significant resources are required to manage and repair water line breaks. As previously mentioned, the service area has significant highly permeable rock which makes identifying water main break locations difficult. Due to the frequency of breaks, the quality of the pipe bedding and fill material are in question. A review of the unaccounted water loss data indicates that water lost due to water main breaks was 182,046 gallons and 327,673 gallons for 2015 and 2016 respectively. Additionally, the unaccounted losses for the water system were 17% and 15% for 2015 and 2016 respectively. Unaccounted losses over 10% are considered excessive and SFWMD requires a corrective action plan when unaccounted losses are over 10%. Fire flow testing is performed by the fire department prior to new development connecting to the existing water distribution system. According to staff, fire flow requirements are currently met. However, there do not appear to be an adequate number of hydrants in accordance with Collier County standards which state require a maximum distance is 500-ft between hydrants in 1 and 2 family areas with building less than 5,000-sf and 300-ft max distance between hydrants in all other areas. Staff also indicated that there are times when they introduce a pressure loss across the system of 5 psi. In general, the water treatment and distribution system are considered to be in poor condition and does not appear to be capable of providing potable water to an expanded service area due to potential limitations with the water supply, water treatment capacity, and water distribution system. The FGUA CIP for 2017 – 2022 has identified approximately $800,000 for upgrades and improvements to the water treatment facilities and approximately $237,000 for repairs and replacement to the distribution system. These budgets are not commensurate with the potential TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 3.75 upgrades needed to maintain the supply, treatment, and distributions systems to maintain potable water service to the existing customers. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 4.1 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN This section identifies an implementation strategy for Collier County to acquire the FGUA service area within Collier County. Based on the summary of the following existing conditions, the following drivers were considered in the development of the implementation strategy and recommended plan: • current and near term deficiencies; • future improvements to increase reliable water service to houses currently on wells systems that can be implemented within 10 years; and • long term improvements to provide increased water and/or wastewater service to houses currently on wells and septic tanks that can be implemented between 10 years and 20 years from now. Potable water system condition – the potable water system is in poor condition and improvements are needed to maintain potable water service to existing customers. As such, Phase 1 of the implementation plan should primarily address improvements to provide reliable potable water and improved fire protection to existing customers. Wastewater system condition – The existing WWTF is in good condition, however the facility is currently operating at approximately 73% capacity on an annual average basis. Should the County choose to expand wastewater service, a limited number of customers could be served by the existing facility. It is estimated that approximately 1,000 residential units could be served with the remaining capacity. Due to the permitted capacity limitations, for any expansion of the service area, a capacity analysis report would be required to evaluate of the ability to expand the existing plant and/or to connect to the County wastewater infrastructure. To provide wastewater service to the Golden Gate service area in its entirety, the County will need to consider expanding the existing treatment facility, upgrading major force mains, and/or interconnecting to Collier County wastewater facilities. 4.1 PHASE 1 Phase 1 improvements were identified to address current near term deficiencies and are recommended to maintain potable water and wastewater service to existing customers. The following improvements projects and technical evaluations are recommended as part of Phase 1: Connect to Collier County potable water supply - as mentioned the condition of the water supply, treatment, and distribution system are considered to be in poor condition and it is recommended that an interconnection with Collier County potable water system be considered. CCWSD currently has an existing 36-inch water transmission main running north and south along 39th Street SW and is located east of CR-951 and the existing SFWMD 951 Canal which parallels the road. The potential connection with this main is just east of the intersection of Collier Blvd (CR-951) TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 4.2 and Green Blvd. The proposed water main connection will require a canal crossing and the new main will run east along Green Blvd. The proposed water main is sized to be 16-inches. The new main will terminate at the existing water booster station. This will allow Collier County to fill the existing tank or construct a new tank. This also allows the County to provide County potable water to the existing distribution network. The existing potable water booster station should be evaluated and expanded in Phase 1 to support future expansion efforts in subsequent phases. A detailed hydraulic evaluation would need to be performed to confirm pipeline sizing. Figure 4-1 illustrates the proposed potable water connection. Minor Upgrades to WWTF – The following upgrades should be considered as part of the Phase 1 improvements. • Headworks: o Replace hatches o Handrail repairs o Corrosion repairs • Plant #2: o Corrosion repairs • Digester o Corrosion repairs • DIW pump station: o Pump mount repair o Corrosion repairs o Paint and coat pipes • DIW: o Corrosion repairs Evaluate WWTF emergency generator capacity – this will confirm if adequate emergency power is available to reliably maintain the facility in the event of power loss. Evaluate potable water production well performance – This will include draw down tests of all wells and it is recommended that at a minimum, one well be televised to evaluate well condition and presence of iron precipitate. The evaluation should include recommendations to maintain permitted withdrawal rates and will consider the installation of the three wells currently permitted, but not installed. Perform detailed WTF evaluation – This will include a structural, mechanical, and electrical system evaluation to assess the useful life of the lime softening plant and develop recommendations to rehabilitate and/or replace lime softening facility. Based on preliminary investigations, the lime softening plant is in poor condition and a long-term strategy to maintain permitted withdrawal rates and WTF capacity should be identified. Additionally, the evaluation should consider frequent fouling of the RO membranes and identify useful life of the RO facility and identify long term strategy to maintain existing potable water system, which may consider alternative treatment technologies to treat the existing shallow well water supply system. §¨¦SANTA BARBARA BLVD") GREEN BLVD HUNTER BLVDSUNSHINE BLVDTROPICANA BLVDSUN S E T R D ! Connection to 36" Collier County Water Main§¨¦ ")GOLDEN GATE PKWY36"36"Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 tel 239.649.4040 fax 239.263.6449 Figure 4-1 FGUA Phase 1 Connect to Collier County Potable Water System June 2017 0 650 1,300 Feet ($$¯\\US1226-F01\U:\177311018\gis\mxd\Figure4-1_FGUA_Phase1Connect_20170609_v02_103504.mxd Revised: 2017-06-09 By: cbernerDisclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. L E G E N D Water Main Golden Gate Water Treatment Facility 1.0 mgd Water Booster Station Prepared by:C.J.B. 06/09/17 Expand/Upgrade Booster Station & Storage TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 4.4 Perform wastewater collection system rehabilitation study – This will include performing an assessment to assist with the development of a maintenance improvement plant that will prioritize collection/conveyance improvements based on criticality, deficiencies, capacity, and life expectancy. FGUA currently budgets approximately $300,000 annually for maintaining and repairing the collection system and this does not appear to be commensurate with maintaining the existing infrastructure and minimizing potential future failures and spills. Perform water distribution system rehabilitation study – This will include performing an assessment to assist with the development of a maintenance improvement plan that will prioritize water distribution improvements based on criticality, deficiencies, capacity, and life expectancy. FGUA currently budgets approximately $300,000 annually for maintaining and repairing the collection system and this does not appear to be commensurate with maintaining the existing infrastructure and minimizing potential future failures and spills. A summary of the budgetary costs associated with the Phase 1 projects is provided in Table 4-1. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 4.5 Table 4-1 Phase I Proposed Implementation Costs Project Preliminary Engineering Budget Estimate Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate Connect to Collier County potable water supply $467,000 $4,674,000 1 2 MG tank at Booster Site $1,700,000 2 Booster Station Expansion $750,000 3 Tie-in to 36-inch $30,000 4 Canal Crossing $500,000 5 951 HDD $750,000 6 16-in PVC (LF) $864,000 7 Connect to FGUA system $30,000 8 I/C upgrade $50,000 Minor Upgrades to WWTF - $180,000 1 Headworks 1.1 Replace Hatches $45,000 1.2 Handrail Improvements $40,000 1.3 Remove Corrosion $10,000 2 Plant #2 2.1 Remove Corrosion $25,000 3 Digester 3.1 Remove Corrosion $25,000 4 DIW PS 4.1 Repair Pump Mount $10,000 4.2 Remove Corrosion $10,000 4.3 Paint and Coat Piping $5,000 5 DIW&MW 5.1 Remove Corrosion $10,000 Evaluate generator capacity $10,000 - Evaluate potable water production well performance $45,000 - Perform detailed WTF evaluation $75,000 - Perform wastewater collection system rehabilitation study $100,000 - Perform water distribution system rehabilitation study $100,000 - Subtotal $797,000 $4,854,000 Total $5,651,000 A preliminary schedule was developed for the Phase 1 improvements and evaluations and is provided below in Table 4-2. The schedule in yellow indicates efforts associated with evaluation and engineering, the schedule in green represents time associated with constructing improvements. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 4.6 Table 4-2 Phase I Proposed Implementation Schedule Months 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Connect to Collier County potable water supply Minor Upgrades to WWTF Evaluate potable water production well performance Evaluate potable water production well performance Perform detailed WTF evaluation Perform wastewater collection system rehabilitation study Perform water distribution system rehabilitation study 4.2 PHASE 2 Currently most residences within the primary service area are on private, shallow aquifer wells for drinking water. Due to the proximity and age of many of the septic systems currently in use in Golden Gate City, the potential for contamination of shallow drinking water wells may be significant. The Phase 2 implementation plan is being driven by a desire to drastically reduce the potential for drinking water contamination by providing clean, safe, potable drinking water to greater than 90% of all residences in the primary service area within the next 10 years. Additionally, Collier County would have an established goal of providing 100% Fire Hydrant coverage within this same area to provide protection if fires similar to the 30th Avenue fire that occurred earlier this year were to threaten Golden Gate City in the future. The proposed water system expansion pipes associated with Phase 2 will have sizes ranging from 8-inches in diameter to 16-inches in diameter, and will be PVC or HDPE. To avoid environmental/social impacts, and minimize construction disruption to these residential areas, Collier County should consider to primarily use trenchless techniques of installation (HDD), but may utilize open-cut installation techniques where technically feasible and appropriate. Figure 4-2 illustrates the proposed Phase 2 potable water system expansion. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 4.7 Success of HDD through rock is highly dependent upon the type and condition of the subject rock. Highly porous limestone makes sealing of the reaming passes difficult but doesn’t necessarily preclude HDD as an acceptable trenchless installation technique. Drillers generally prefer solid ground conditions over sands/shell/peats due to the ability to better control the pilot drill, water infiltration, and subsequent stability of the reamed bore hole. During detailed design, geotechnical investigations will be required. The required expansion necessary to complete the Phase 2 implementation plan is discussed by quadrant of Golden Gate City as follows: • The proposed work in Quadrant 1 includes a second redundant connection to the CCWSD 36-inch water main. This connection will also require a canal crossing. Other work proposed in Quadrant 1 consists of 16-inch piping necessary to provide water to the areas at the western most portions of Golden Gate City. • Work in Quadrant 2 is comprised of the proposed piping necessary for connecting the remaining homes not currently served by the FGUA water system. • The proposed piping improvements associated with Quadrant 3 includes 12-inch piping to allow expansion of the system to the west and the 8-inch piping necessary for distribution along neighborhood streets. • Quadrant 4 contains the largest amount of piping improvements which includes 16-inch piping and 12-inch piping to distribute water to the remaining neighborhoods. 8-inch piping is proposed for distribution along each street. The proposed expansion also contains three dead ends at Santa Barbara Blvd. to allow for future expansion. The budgetary cost estimates for each quadrant is provided in Table 4-3. The linear foot pricing was developed to include trenching and backfill, pipe material and installation, fittings, valves, hydrants, service connections, restoration, and contractor’s general conditions, overhead and profit. Costs have been estimated for each pipe diameter and length, based on the total unit costs shown above. The canal crossing proposed for the point of connection have been estimated as a separate line item due to the technical complexity and permitting/environmental issues associated with that installation. GREEN BLVD SANTA BARBARA BLVDCR 951! Connection to 36" Collier County Water Main Future Connection §¨¦CR 951GOLDEN GATE PKWY 36"16" Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 tel 239.649.4040 fax 239.263.6449 Figure 4-2 FGUA Phase 2: Existing & Proposed Potable Water Distribution Map June 2017 0 625 1,250 Feet ($$¯\\US1226-F01\U:\177311018\gis\mxd\Figure4-2_FGUA_Phase2_20170608_103504.mxd Revised: 2017-06-08 By: cbernerDisclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. L E G E N D Collier County Water Main Existing FGUA Water MainDiameter 8" or less 10" to 12" 14" or greater Proposed FGUA WaterMain Diameter 8" 12" 16" Prepared by:C.J.B. 06/08/17 ! Connection to 36" Collier County Water Main Quadrant 1 Quadrant 2 Quadrant 3 Quadrant 4 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 4.9 Table 4-3 Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost Water Distribution System Expansion for Golden Gate City (per Quadrant) Quadrant 1 Pipe Size (in) Length (LF) Cost Per Linear Foot (LF) Total Cost 8 0 $140.00 $0.00 12 0 $170.00 $0.00 16 5,025 $200.00 $1,005,000.00 Redundant connection to CCWSD 36" water main & canal crossing (at Golden Gate Pkwy) 1 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 Total (including 10% for engineering & 30% contingency) $1,505,000.00 Quadrant 2 Pipe Size (in) Length (LF) Cost Per Linear Foot (LF) Total Cost 8" 10,950 $140.00 $1,533,000.00 12" 0 $170.00 $0.00 16" 460 $200.00 $92,000.00 Total (including 10% for engineering & 30% contingency) $1,625,000.00 Quadrant 3 Pipe Size (in) Length (LF) Cost Per Linear Foot (LF) Total Cost 8" 32,200 $140.00 $4,508,000.00 12" 7,625 $170.00 $1,296,250.00 16" 1,790 $200.00 $358,000.00 Total (including 10% for engineering & 30% contingency) $6,162,250.00 Quadrant 4 Pipe Size (in) Length (LF) Cost Per Linear Foot (LF) Total Cost 8" 61,950 $140.00 $8,673,000.00 12" 13,100 $170.00 $2,227,000.00 16" 5,100 $200.00 $1,020,000.00 Total (including 10% for engineering & 30% contingency) $11,920,000.00 TOTAL (FOUR QUADRANTS) $21,212,250.00 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 4.10 The proposed construction schedule for the distribution system expansion is provided in Table 4-4 below. Areas shaded in yellow represents the time expected for engineering and permitting. Areas shaded in green represent anticipated construction. Table 4-4 Phase II Implantation Proposed Schedule Months 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Quadrant 1 Quadrant 2 Quadrant 3 Quadrant 4 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 4.11 4.3 PHASE 3 Septic tank systems have the potential for contamination of both groundwater and surface water that can occur from septic systems that are in disrepair or failing. This can result in bacterial contamination of surface water (lakes, Golden Gate canal, etc.) as well as groundwater that may be utilized for drinking water. According to a report published by the National Groundwater Association in 1995, “The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has designated areas with septic tank densities of greater than 40 systems per mi² (1 system per 16 acres) as regions of potential ground-water contamination.” By comparison, the typical single family residential lot in Golden Gate City is approximately 80 feet by 125 feet and even after accounting for streets, potentially equates to greater than 1 system for each 0.28 acres, placing this area in what the EPA would consider as being ‘at risk of contamination’. Even with most Golden Gate City residents on a safe, reliable source of drinking water, septic systems can negatively impact residents of the more rural Estates to the north and east, as well as leaching into surface water bodies such as the Golden Gate Canal which ultimately feeds into Naples Bay. As previously mentioned, the existing WWTF is currently operating at 73% of it’s capacity. The remaining available capacity could be made available to approximately an additional 1,000 residential homes. Expanding the wastewater collection system any further would require either an upgrade of the WWTF and/or an interconnection with Collier County wastewater infrastructure. The existing WWTF site currently does not have adequate space to expand the plant unless the RIBs or a portion of the RIBs are abandoned. To do this, an additional DIW would need to be constructed. There is a 20-inch force main located along Santa Barbara. The force main connects master pump station (MPS) 104.00 and 313.00. MPS 104 pumps wastewater flows to the Collier County North County Water Reclamation Facility (NCWRF) and MPS 313.00 pumps wastewater flows, ultimately, to the SCWRF. The 20-inch force main is currently not utilized, but it has the potential to allow the County to redirect flow from either of the pump stations to either of the County’s WRFs. Should the County choose to construct an interconnection between the Golden Gate City system and the County’s system, the 20-inch force main along Santa Barbara Blvd would be a logical connection, giving the County the ability to redirect flows the north and to the south. The existing septic tank areas were evaluated to determine logical areas to expand the wastewater collection system. The following criteria was utilized to identify future expansion areas: • Areas should be located adjacent or near the existing WWTF, should the County choose to continue to operate and/or expand the WWTF. • Areas should be located near or adjacent to Santa Barbara Boulevard should the County choose to connect to the County’s infrastructure. • Areas near or adjacent to canal systems should be considered, as the septic tanks may pose a greater threat of contamination. Figure 4-3 illustrates the proposed three (3) septic tank replacement program areas to be considered by the County. There are 958 residential parcels that could be served by the existing WWTF and/or through an interconnection to the County’s existing wastewater infrastructure. Each TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 4.12 septic tank replacement area will require the installation of gravity sewers, pump stations, and force mains to convey flows to the WWTF and/or the County’s system. The budgetary cost estimates for each of the septic tank areas is provided in Table 4-3. The cost estimate is conceptual in nature and includes costs associated with gravity sewers, manholes, pump stations, and force main systems to convey wastewater flow to the WWTF and/or to connect to the 20-inch force main located on Santa Barbara Boulevard near the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway. Table 4-5 Phase 3 Proposed Implementation Costs Group 1 Item Total Cost Lift Stations $1,600,000.00 8-inch Gravity & Manholes $3,100,000.00 Force Mains $600,000.00 Total (including 10% for engineering & 30% contingency) $7,420,000.00 Group 2 Item Total Cost Lift Stations $1,200,000.00 8-inch Gravity & Manholes $4,540,000.00 Force Mains $600,000.00 Total (including 10% for engineering & 30% contingency) $8,876,000.00 Group 3 Item Total Cost Lift Stations $1,200,000.00 8-inch Gravity & Manholes $3,600,000.00 Force Mains $600,000.00 Total (including 10% for engineering & 30% contingency) $7,560,000.00 Item Total Cost 8-inch Force main $1,680,000.00 Connection to WWTF $100,000.00 Total (including 10% for engineering & 30% contingency) $2,492,000.00 Total for Wastewater Expansion $26,348,000.00 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 4.13 Based on discussions with Collier County, the expansion of the FGUA wastewater collection and conveyance system is secondary to providing a reliable potable water source to the residents within Golden Gate City, and considerations for septic tank replacement programs may be beyond a 20-year planning period. No schedules were developed specifically for Phase 3. While the sewer system expansion is not a priority, it is important to note that the three (3) septic tank replacement areas identified could be constructed concurrent to the water main expansion program. This would provide a cost savings and minimize disruption to residents by consolidating the construction under one construction contract. ÆÇ ÆÇ ÆÇ ÆÇ ÆÇ ÆÇ ÆÇ !!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2 !!2 !!2!!2 !!2!!2!!2!!2 !!2[Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú[Ú[Ú[Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú [Ú §¨¦SANTA BARBARA BLVD") GREEN BLVD HUNTER BLVDSUNSHINE BLVDSU N S E T R D ToMPS104.00 ToMPS313.00 Proposed 8"Force Main TROPICANA BLVD§¨¦ ")GOLDEN GATE PKWYStantec Consulting Services Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd. Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 tel 239.649.4040 fax 239.263.6449 Figure 4-3 FGUA Wastewater Collection Expansion Map June 2017 0 650 1,300 Feet ($$¯\\US1226-F01\U:\177311018\gis\mxd\Figure4-3_FGUA_WWExpansion_20170609_v02_103504.mxd Revised: 2017-06-09 By: cbernerDisclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. L E G E N D [Ú Pump Station [Ú Deep Injection Well !!2 Manhole ÆÇ Air Release Valve Sanitary Gravity Main Sanitary Force Main Existing 20" Force Main FGUA Service Area Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Facility Wastewater ExpansionGroup Group 1 | 438 Parcels Group 2 | 223 Parcels Group 3 | 297 Parcels Prepared by:C.J.B. 06/09/17 Existing 20"Force Main TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 5.1 5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION The purpose of this report is to evaluate the technical feasibility of Collier County’s acquisition of FGUA assets within the Golden Gate service area and identify/evaluate opportunities to: • Address safe and reliable drinking water and wastewater service delivery; • Provide water to residents at best value rates; • Make a long-term investment improving viability in the utility system; and • Provide a long-term strategy to address environmental impacts. As such, Stantec performed a desktop analysis and performed several site visits to identify the water and wastewater assets, assess the condition, and develop an implementation plan for Collier County to take over the utility service area. In general, the WWTF and collection system are in good condition and limited improvements are needed to maintain wastewater service to existing customers. Based on the review of raw water well pumpage data and water production data, the WTF has an inefficient recovery rate which is then compounded by water main breaks and unaccounted losses within the system. Additionally, the existing lime softening facility is in poor condition and further evaluation of the structural integrity of the existing tankage is required. It is understood that Golden Gate City is underlain by a large layer of caprock and that a large portion of the utility system was not originally installed with proper pipe bedding. The combination of these two issues has created a significant issue with water main breaks, as the vibration of the piping against the caprock leads to breaks. Additionally, the permeability of the rock allows horizontal (below ground) movement of the water discharge, causing in some cases a significant delay in locating where the main breaks occur. Repair and replacement of the mains requires jackhammering of the caprock in order to excavate trenches for repairs, extending the time and cost necessary to place the main back in service. Preliminary review of annual budgets associated with repairs and rehabilitation efforts for both water and wastewater systems indicates that the repair and replacement budget may be underfunded. Additionally, improvements to the piping systems appear to reactionary in nature. A three -phased implementation plan was developed as follows: Phase 1 – Improvements recommended to address current and near term deficiencies; Phase 2 - Future improvements to increase reliable potable water service and fire protection to houses currently on wells to be implemented within 10 year Phase 3 - long term improvements to provide increased wastewater service to houses currently on wells and septic tanks that can be implemented between 10 years and 20 years, from now. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE rj v:\1773\active\177311018\reports\fgua technical feasibility study draft 20170612 - final .docx 5.2 A summary of the preliminary cost estimates for each phase is provided below in Table 5-1: Table 5-1 Implementation Plan Summary Phase Population Served - Water Population Served Wastewater Budgetary Cost of Improvements and Evaluations 1 12,404 12,404 $5,651,000 2 21,285 12,404 $21,212,250 3 21,285 15,000 $26,348,000 Total $53,211,250 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE Appendix A June 12, 2017 A.1 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT 03/14/2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Discussion with the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to consider the level of support for acquiring utility services provided by the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) providing water and wastewater services within the Golden Gate service area. OBJECTIVE: Determine Board of County Commission vision and support for acquiring, via transfer, all assets and inventory of the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) providing water and wastewater services within the Golden Gate service area, placing the utility service under the operation of Collier County Utilities Department; providing direction for staff to return with all appropriate transfer documents and legislative amendments at a future meeting. CONSIDERATIONS: Water and wastewater services are provided within Golden Gate under authority established by FGUA. On March 1, 1999, an Interlocal Agreement, between FGUA and the Collier County Water-Sewer District (the District) was executed as authorized under Part 1, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. (Attachment A). Residents receiving utility services provided by FGUA pay premium water and sewer rates as compared to rates charged by the District to residents outside of the Golden Gate service area. The majority of residents within the FGUA service area are served by private wells and septic tanks. Residences are in close proximity to each other and such use poses a significant risk of contamination of individual water wells or supply sources for the entire region. Private water wells and septic tanks age over time, have a limited lifecycle, and there is wide disparity in the level of maintenance by various property owners to extend the life and functionality of the tanks. Should the County acquire the FGUA utility system, an opportunity exists to address safe and reliable drinking water and wastewater service delivery, provide water to residents at best value rates, make a long-term investment improving viability in the utility system, and provide a long -term strategy to address environmental impacts. Because FGUA is a public utility, and the FGUA Board supports acquisition of the system by the District, ownership transfer is viewed as a cooperative and beneficial venture for both entities, as well as residents served by the utility. The terms for acquiring FGUA are provided through a clearly defined Interlocal Agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no Fiscal Impact associated with this Executive Summary. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney, is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. -JAK GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Acquisition of FGUA utilities would meet current Growth Management Plan standards to ensure the adequacy and availability of viable public facilities. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners support the vision as proposed directing staff to move forward with the feasibility assessment toward the acquisition of all assets and inventory of FGUA pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement to provide water and wastewater services within the Golden Gate service area, placing the utility service under the operation of Collier County Utilities Department; directing staff to return with all appropriate transfer documents and legislative amendments for consideration and formal action at a future meeting after the feasibility assessment is completed. Prepared by: Dave Lykins, Exec. Coord. for District #3 Commissioner Burt Saunders 10.A Packet Pg. 63 03/14/2017 ATTACHMENT(S) 1. COLLIER COUNTY-FGUA INTERLOCAL WITH PURCHASE OPTION (PDF) 10.A Packet Pg. 64 03/14/2017 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 10.A Doc ID: 2845 Item Summary: Discussion with the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to consider the level of support for acquiring utility services provided by the Florida Governmental Utility Authority FGUA) providing water and wastewater services within the Golden Gate service area. Meeting Date: 03/14/2017 Prepared by: Title: – Board of County Commissioners Name: Dave Lykins 03/06/2017 3:12 PM Submitted by: Title: – Board of County Commissioners Name: Burt Saunders 03/06/2017 3:12 PM Approved By: Review: Public Utilities Department George Yilmaz Level 1 Division Reviewer Skipped 03/06/2017 4:25 PM Public Utilities Department George Yilmaz Level 2 Division Administrator Review Skipped 03/06/2017 4:27 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 03/06/2017 4:50 PM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 03/07/2017 9:35 AM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 03/07/2017 4:24 PM County Manager's Office Leo E. Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 03/08/2017 12:07 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 03/14/2017 9:00 AM 10.A Packet Pg. 65 Attachment A 10.A.a Packet Pg. 66 10.A.a Packet Pg. 67 10.A.a Packet Pg. 68 10.A.a Packet Pg. 69 10.A.a Packet Pg. 70 10.A.a Packet Pg. 71 10.A.a Packet Pg. 72 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE Appendix B June 12, 2017 B.1 FGUA FDEP WASTEWATER PERMIT FGUA WTF PERMIT FGUA SFWMD WATER USE PERMIT Florida Department of Environmental Protection South District Post Office Box 2549 Fort Myers, Florida 33902-2549 SouthDistrict@dep.state.fl.us Rick Scott Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera Lt. Governor Jonathan P. Steverson Interim Secretary SENT BY ELECTRONIC MAIL In the Matter of an Application for Permit by: Florida Governmental Utility Authority Robert Dickson, Capital Program Manager Collier County -- DW 280 Wekiva Springs Rd. Golden Gate WWTP Longwood, Florida 32779 P.A. File Number: FLA142140-017-DW1P Email: rdickson@govmserv.com Everglades West Coast Basin NOTICE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE Enclosed is Permit Number FLA142140-017 to operate the Golden Gate WWTP, issued under Chapter 403, Florida Statutes. The permit is accompanied by an Administrative Order number AO-20150616-SD. Monitoring requirements under this permit are effective August 1, 2015. Until such time, the permittee shall continue to monitor and report in accordance with previously effective permit requirements, if any. The Department's proposed agency action shall become final unless a timely petition for an administrative hearing is filed under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, within fourteen days of receipt of notice. The procedures for petitioning for a hearing are set forth below. A person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department's proposed permitting decision may petition for an administrative proceeding (hearing) under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes. The petition must contain the information set forth below and must be filed (received by the Clerk) in the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000. Under Rule 62-110.106(4), Florida Administrative Code, a person may request an extension of the time for filing a petition for an administrative hearing. The request must be filed (received by the Clerk) in the Office of General Counsel before the end of the time period for filing a petition for an administrative hearing. Petitions by the applicant or any of the persons listed below must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this written notice. Petitions filed by any persons other than those entitled to written notice under Section 120.60(3), Florida Statutes, must be filed within fourteen days of publication of the notice or within fourteen days of receipt of the written notice, whichever occurs first. Section 120.60(3), Florida Statutes, however, also allows that any person who has asked the Department in writing for notice of agency action may file a petition within fourteen days of receipt of such notice, regardless of the date of publication. The petitioner shall mail a copy of the petition to the applicant at the address indicated above at the time of filing. The failure of any person to file a petition or request for an extension of time within fourteen days of receipt of notice shall constitute a waiver of that person's right to request an administrative determination (hearing) under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes. Any subsequent intervention (in a proceeding initiated by another PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP NOTICE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE Page 2 of 3 party) will be only at the discretion of the presiding officer upon the filing of a motion in compliance with Rule 28- 106.205, Florida Administrative Code. A petition that disputes the material facts on which the Department's action is based must contain the following information, as indicated in Rule 28-106.201, Florida Administrative Code: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency's file or identification number, if known; (b) The name, address, any e-mail address, any facsimile number, and telephone number of the petitioner, if the petitioner is not represented by an attorney or a qualified representative; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner's representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding; and an explanation of how the petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the determination; (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the Department's decision; (d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate; (e) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the Department's proposed action; (f) A statement of the specific rules or statutes the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the Department's proposed action, including an explanation of how the alleged facts relate to the specific rules or statutes; and (g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action petitioner wishes the Department to take with respect to the Department's proposed action. Because the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate final agency action, the filing of a petition means that the Department's final action may be different from the position taken by it in this notice. Persons whose substantial interests will be affected by any such final decision of the Department have the right to petition to become a party to the proceeding, in accordance with the requirements set forth above. Mediation under Section 120.573, Florida Statutes, is not available for this proceeding. This permit action is final and effective on the date filed with the Clerk of the Department unless a petition (or request for an extension of time) is filed in accordance with the above. Upon the timely filing of a petition (or request for an extension of time), this permit will not be effective until further order of the Department. Any party to the permit has the right to seek judicial review of the permit action under Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, by the filing of a notice of appeal under Rules 9.110 and 9.190, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, with the Clerk of the Department in the Office of General Counsel, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-3000, and by filing a copy of the notice of appeal accompanied by the applicable filing fees with the appropriate district court of appeal. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days from the date when this permit action is filed with the Clerk of the Department. Executed in Fort Myers, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION for Jon M. Iglehart Director of District Management PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP NOTICE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that this NOTICE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE and all copies were mailed before the close of business on June 16, 2015, to the listed persons. FILING AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT FILED, on this date, under Section 120.52, Florida Statutes, with the designated Deputy Clerk, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. __________________________________ June 16, 2015 [Clerk] [Date] JMI/RW/se Enclosures Copies furnished to: Peter Hernandez ; via email (phernandez@cphcorp.com) Wade Wood P.E. via email (wwood@cphengineers.com) Diane Loughlin, DEP--Fort Myers Douglas Meurer; via email (DMeurer@leegov.com) Deanna Newburg, DEP--Fort Myers David Rhodes P.G., DEP--Fort Myers Ron Walters, DEP--Fort Myers Florida Department of Environmental Protection South District Post Office Box 2549 Fort Myers, Florida 33902-2549 SouthDistrict@dep.state.fl.us Rick Scott Governor Carlos Lopez-Cantera Lt. Governor Jonathan P. Steverson Interim Secretary STATE OF FLORIDA DOMESTIC WASTEWATER FACILITY PERMIT PERMITTEE: PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140 Florida Governmental Utility Authority FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P ISSUE DATE: June 16, 2015 RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: EXPIRATION DATE: June 15, 2020 Robert Dickson, Capital Program Manager 280 Wekiva Springs Rd. Longwood, Florida 32779 (407) 629-6900 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP 4931 32nd Ave. SW Naples, Florida 34116 Collier County Latitude: 26°10' 11" N Longitude: 81°42' 19" W This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 403, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and applicable rules of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). This permit does not constitute authorization to discharge wastewater other than as expressly stated in this permit. This permit is accompanied by an Administrative Order, pursuant to paragraphs 403.088(2)(e) and (f), Florida Statutes. Compliance with Administrative Order, AO-20150616-SD, is a specific requirement of this permit. The above named permittee is hereby authorized to operate the facilities in accordance with the documents attached hereto and specifically described as follows: WASTEWATER TREATMENT: An existing 1.500 MGD, annual average daily flow (AADF) permitted capacity, complete mix activated sludge process domestic wastewater treatment facility. The facility's three-month average daily flow (TMADF) is limited to 1.800 MGD. The facility consists of: barscreens, a cyclone degritter, a 269,648-gallon equalization basin, a first anoxic zone of 70,000 gallons, a first aeration zone of 351,437 gallons, a first anaerobic zone of 141,062 gallons, a second aerobic zone of 150,000 gallons, a second anaerobic zone of 93,750 gallons, a reaeration zone of 32,680 gallons flowing into two clarifiers (2,827 sq.ft. and 1,810 sq.ft.), three chlorine contact chambers (19,100 gallons, 3,813 gallons, and 18,400 gallons), and a 3-stage digester tank (300,000 gallons). REUSE OR DISPOSAL: Land Application R-001: An existing 1.250 MGD AADF permitted capacity rapid infiltration basin system. R-001 is a reuse system which consists of four percolation ponds (total area of 7 acres) located on site having a capacity of 1.250 MGD, located approximately at latitude 26°10' 11" N, longitude 81°42' 19" W. Demineralization concentrate is blended with reclaimed water going to the rapid infiltration basins R-001, and the underground injection well U-001. Underground Injection U-001: An existing 5.0328 MGD or 3,495 gallons per minute (GPM) maximum flow rate permitted capacity underground injection well authorized by the Department permit number 263889-003-UO. The well is located approximately at latitude 26°10' 12" N, longitude 81°42' 11" W. 1 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P IN ACCORDANCE WITH: The limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in this cover sheet and Part I through Part IX on pages 1 through 17 of this permit. [THIS SECTION INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 2 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P I. RECLAIMED WATER AND EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS A. Reuse and Land Application Systems 1. During the period beginning on the effective date and lasting through the expiration date of this permit, the permittee is authorized to direct reclaimed water to Reuse System R-001. Such reclaimed water shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below and reported in accordance with Permit Condition I.B.7.: Reclaimed Water Limitations Monitoring Requirements Parameter Units Max/Min Limit Statistical Basis Frequency of Monitoring Sample Type Monitoring Site Number Notes Flow (to ponds) MGD Max Max 1.250 Report Annual Average Monthly Average Continuous Calculated * FLW-03 [OTH-01 minus FLW-02] See I.A.4 BOD, Carbonaceous 5 day, 20C mg/L Max Max Max Max 20.0 30.0 45.0 60.0 Annual Average Monthly Average Weekly Average Single Sample Weekly 8-hr FPC EFA-01 Solids, Total Suspended mg/L Max Max Max Max 20.0 30.0 45.0 60.0 Annual Average Monthly Average Weekly Average Single Sample Weekly 8-hr FPC EFA-01 Coliform, Fecal #/100mL Max Max Max 200 200 800 Monthly Geometric Mean Annual Average Single Sample Weekly Grab EFA-01 See I.A.5 pH s.u. Min Max 6.0 8.5 Single Sample Single Sample Continuous Meter EFA-01 See I.A.3 Chlorine, Total Residual (For Disinfection) mg/L Min 0.5 Single Sample Continuous Meter EFA-01 See I.A.6 and I.A.3 and I.A.7 Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) mg/L Max 12.0 Single Sample Weekly 8-hr FPC EFA-01 Phosphorus, Total (as P) mg/L Max Report Single Sample Monthly Grab EFA-01 Nitrogen, Total mg/L Max Report Single Sample Monthly Grab EFA-01 Flow (Concentrate) MGD Max Max Report Report Monthly Average Annual Average Continuous Meter FLW-04 * Flow shall be calculated until the time when a flow meter is placed on line to measure flow to the ponds. [62-600.400(3)][62-600.740][62-610.865(1) through (13)][62-601.500(3)] 3 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P 2. Reclaimed water samples shall be taken at the monitoring site locations listed in Permit Condition I.A.1. and as described below: Monitoring Site Number Description of Monitoring Site OTH-01 Flow is measured downstream end of chlorine contact chamber 1A, but prior to the effluent pump station. OTH-02 At the effluent pump station prior to discharge. FLW-02 Magnetic flow meter on the line to underground injection well. FLW-03 Flow to the ponds is calculated from the difference between OTH-01 and FLW-02, until a flow-measuring device is installed to measure flow to the ponds. Thereafter, flow to the ponds is measured by way of the flow-measuring device. FLW-04 Concentrate flow from the water treatment plant to the effluent pump station. EFA-01 Reclaimed water samples are taken downstream of chlorine contact chamber 1A, but prior to the effluent pump station. 3. Hourly measurement of pH and total residual chlorine for disinfection during the period of required operator attendance may be substituted for continuous measurement. [Chapter 62-601, Figure 2] 4. Recording flow meters with totalizers (at OTH-01 and FLW-02) shall be utilized to measure flow and each calibrated at least once every 12 months. After a recording flow meter is installed to measure and record FLW- 03, the flow meter and recorder shall be calibrated at least once every 12 months. [62-601.200(17) and .500(6)] 5. The effluent limitation for the monthly geometric mean for fecal coliform is only applicable if 10 or more values are reported. If fewer than 10 values are reported, the monthly geometric mean shall be calculated and reported on the Discharge Monitoring Report to be used to calculate the annual average. [62-600.440(4)(c)] 6. Total residual chlorine must be maintained for a minimum contact time of 15 minutes based on peak hourly flow. [62-610.510, 62-600.440(4)(b) and (5)(b)] 7. Underground Injection: Disinfection is not required for discharge to Class G-IV water using Class I wells. However, the permittee shall maintain the capability to disinfect at a level that is consistent with the alternate disposal mechanism approved for this facility in accordance with Rule 62-600.540(5), F.A.C. [62-600.540(1)] 4 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P B. Other Limitations and Monitoring and Reporting Requirements 1. During the period beginning on the effective date and lasting through the expiration date of this permit, the treatment facility shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below and reported in accordance with condition I.B.7.: Limitations Monitoring Requirements Parameter Units Max/Min Limit Statistical Basis Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Monitoring Site Number Notes Flow (through treatment plant) MGD Max Max Max 1.500 1.800 Report Annual Average Three-Month Average Monthly Average Continuous Recording Flow Meter with Totalizer FLW-01 See I.B.4 Percent Capacity, (TMADF/Permitted Capacity) x 100 percent Max Report Three-Month Average Monthly Calculated CAL-01 Flow (to UIC well) gallons/min. Max 3,495 Daily Maximum Continuous Recording Flow Meter with Totalizer FLW-02 BOD, Carbonaceous 5 day, 20C (Influent) mg/L Max Report Single Sample Weekly 8-hr FPC INF-01 See I.B.3 Solids, Total Suspended (Influent) mg/L Max Report Single Sample Weekly 8-hr FPC INF-01 See I.B.3 [62-600.400(3)][62-528.425][62-528.430][62-601.300][62-601.500(3)] 5 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P 2. Samples shall be taken at the monitoring site locations listed in Permit Condition I.B.1. and as described below: Monitoring Site Number Description of Monitoring Site FLW-01 Flow meter at the parshall flume at the plant headworks. CAL-01 Calculated from the FLW-01 flow measurements. FLW-02 Magnetic flow meter on the line to underground injection well. INF-01 Sample taken from a sample port on the influent force main. 3. Influent samples shall be collected so that they do not contain digester supernatant or return activated sludge, or any other plant process recycled waters. [62-601.500(4)] 4. A recording flow meter with totalizer shall be utilized to measure flow and calibrated at least once every 12 months. [62-601.200(17) and .500(6)] 5. The sample collection, analytical test methods and method detection limits (MDLs) applicable to this permit shall be conducted using a sufficiently sensitive method to ensure compliance with applicable water quality standards and effluent limitations and shall be in accordance with Rule 62-4.246, Chapters 62-160 and 62-601, F.A.C., and 40 CFR 136, as appropriate. The list of Department established analytical methods, and corresponding MDLs (method detection limits) and PQLs (practical quantitation limits), which is titled "FAC 62-4 MDL/PQL Table (April 26, 2006)" is available at http://www.dep.state.fl.us/labs/library/index.htm. The MDLs and PQLs as described in this list shall constitute the minimum acceptable MDL/PQL values and the Department shall not accept results for which the laboratory's MDLs or PQLs are greater than those described above unless alternate MDLs and/or PQLs have been specifically approved by the Department for this permit. Any method included in the list may be used for reporting as long as it meets the following requirements: a. The laboratory's reported MDL and PQL values for the particular method must be equal or less than the corresponding method values specified in the Department's approved MDL and PQL list; b. The laboratory reported MDL for the specific parameter is less than or equal to the permit limit or the applicable water quality criteria, if any, stated in Chapter 62-302, F.A.C. Parameters that are listed as "report only" in the permit shall use methods that provide an MDL, which is equal to or less than the applicable water quality criteria stated in 62-302, F.A.C.; and c. If the MDLs for all methods available in the approved list are above the stated permit limit or applicable water quality criteria for that parameter, then the method with the lowest stated MDL shall be used. When the analytical results are below method detection or practical quantitation limits, the permittee shall report the actual laboratory MDL and/or PQL values for the analyses that were performed following the instructions on the applicable discharge monitoring report. Where necessary, the permittee may request approval of alternate methods or for alternative MDLs or PQLs for any approved analytical method. Approval of alternate laboratory MDLs or PQLs are not necessary if the laboratory reported MDLs and PQLs are less than or equal to the permit limit or the applicable water quality criteria, if any, stated in Chapter 62-302, F.A.C. Approval of an analytical method not included in the above- referenced list is not necessary if the analytical method is approved in accordance with 40 CFR 136 or deemed acceptable by the Department. [62-4.246, 62-160] 6. The permittee shall provide safe access points for obtaining representative influent, reclaimed water, and effluent samples which are required by this permit. [62-601.500(5)] 7. Monitoring requirements under this permit are effective on the first day of the second month following the effective date of the permit. Until such time, the permittee shall continue to monitor and report in accordance with previously effective permit requirements, if any. During the period of operation authorized by this permit, the permittee shall complete and submit to the Department Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) in accordance with the frequencies specified by the REPORT type (i.e. monthly, quarterly, semiannual, annual, etc.) indicated on the DMR forms attached to this permit. Unless specified otherwise in this permit, monitoring 6 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P results for each monitoring period shall be submitted in accordance with the associated DMR due dates below. DMRs shall be submitted for each required monitoring period including periods of no discharge. REPORT Type on DMR Monitoring Period Mail or Electronically Submit by Monthly First day of month - last day of month 28th day of following month Quarterly January 1 - March 31 April 1 - June 30 July 1 - September 30 October 1 - December 31 April 28 July 28 October 28 January 28 Semiannual January 1 - June 30 July 1 - December 31 July 28 January 28 Annual January 1 - December 31 January 28 The permittee may submit either paper or electronic DMR forms. If submitting paper DMR forms, the permittee shall make copies of the attached DMR forms, without altering the original format or content unless approved by the Department, and shall mail the completed DMR forms to the Department's South District Office at the address specified in Permit Condition I.B.10. by the twenty-eighth (28th) of the month following the month of operation. If submitting electronic DMR forms, the permittee shall use the electronic DMR system(s) approved in writing by the Department and shall electronically submit the completed DMR forms to the Department by the twenty- eighth (28th) of the month following the month of operation. Data submitted in electronic format is equivalent to data submitted on signed and certified paper DMR forms. The Department electronic DMR system at the time of permit issuance is available through the DEP Business Portal at: http://www.fldepportal.com/go/submit-report/. [62-620.610(18)][62-601.300(1),(2), and (3)] 8. During the period of operation authorized by this permit, reclaimed water or effluent shall be monitored annually for the primary and secondary drinking water standards contained in Chapter 62-550, F.A.C., (except for asbestos, color, odor, and corrosivity). These monitoring results shall be reported to the Department annually on the DMR. During years when a permit is not renewed, a certification stating that no new non- domestic wastewater dischargers have been added to the collection system since the last reclaimed water or effluent analysis was conducted may be submitted in lieu of the report. The annual reclaimed water or effluent analysis report or the certification shall be completed and submitted in a timely manner so as to be received by the Department at the address identified on the DMR by June 28 of each year. Approved analytical methods identified in Rule 62-620.100(3)(j), F.A.C., shall be used for the analysis. If no method is included for a parameter, methods specified in Chapter 62-550, F.A.C., shall be used. [62-601.300(4)][62-601.500(3)][62- 610.300(4)] 9. The permittee shall submit an Annual Reuse Report using DEP Form 62-610.300(4)(a)2. on or before January 1 of each year. [62-610.870(3)] 10. Unless specified otherwise in this permit, all reports and other information required by this permit, including 24-hour notifications, shall be submitted to or reported to, as appropriate, the Department's South District Office at the address specified below: Florida Department of Environmental Protection South District Office 2295 Victoria Ave., Suite 364 Ft. Myers, Florida 33901 SouthDistrict@dep.state.fl.us Phone Number - (239) 344-5600 [62-620.305] 7 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P 11. All reports and other information shall be signed in accordance with the requirements of Rule 62-620.305, F.A.C. [62-620.305] II. BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS 1. Biosolids generated by this facility may be transferred to Charlotte County Bio-Recycling Center, 29751 Zemel Rd., Punta Gorda, Florida, or disposed of in a Class I solid waste landfill. Transferring biosolids to an alternative biosolids treatment facility does not require a permit modification; however, use of an alternative biosolids treatment facility requires submittal of a copy of the agreement pursuant to Rule 62-640.880(1)(c), F.A.C., along with a written notification to the Department at least 30 days before transport of the biosolids. [62-620.320(6), 62-640.880(1)] 2. The permittee shall monitor and keep records of the quantities of biosolids generated, received from source facilities, treated, distributed and marketed, land applied, used as a biofuel or for bioenergy, transferred to another facility, or landfilled. These records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. [62-640.650(4)(a)] 3. Biosolids quantities shall be monitored by the permittee as specified below. Results shall be reported on the permittee's Discharge Monitoring Report in accordance with Condition I.B.7. Biosolids Limitations Monitoring Requirements Parameter Units Max/ Min Limit Statistical Basis Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Monitoring Site Number Biosolids Quantity (Landfilled) Dry Tons Max Report Monthly Total Monthly Calculated RMP-01 Biosolids Quantity (Transferred) Dry Tons Max Report Monthly Total Monthly Calculated RMP-02 [62-640.650(5)(a)1] 4. Biosolids quantities shall be calculated as listed in Permit Condition II.3 and as described below: Monitoring Site Number Description of Monitoring Site Calculations RMP-01 Monthly Total of Biosolids Landfilled. RMP-02 Monthly Total of Biosolids Transferred. 5. The treatment, management, transportation, use, land application, or disposal of biosolids shall not cause a violation of the odor prohibition in subsection 62-296.320(2), F.A.C. [62-640.400(6)] 6. Storage of biosolids or other solids at this facility shall be in accordance with the Facility Biosolids Storage Plan. [62-640.300(4)] 7. Biosolids shall not be spilled from or tracked off the treatment facility site by the hauling vehicle. [62- 640.400(9)] 8. Disposal of biosolids, septage, and "other solids" in a solid waste disposal facility, or disposal by placement on land for purposes other than soil conditioning or fertilization, such as at a monofill, surface impoundment, waste pile, or dedicated site, shall be in accordance with Chapter 62-701, F.A.C. [62-640.100(6)(b) & (c)] 9. The permittee shall not be held responsible for treatment and management violations that occur after its biosolids have been accepted by a permitted biosolids treatment facility with which the source facility has an agreement in accordance with subsection 62-640.880(1)(c), F.A.C., for further treatment, management, or disposal. [62-640.880(1)(b)] 8 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P 10. The permittee shall keep hauling records to track the transport of biosolids between the facilities. The hauling records shall contain the following information: Source Facility Biosolids Treatment Facility or Treatment Facility 1. Date and time shipped 1. Date and time received 2. Amount of biosolids shipped 2. Amount of biosolids received 3. Degree of treatment (if applicable) 3. Name and ID number of source facility 4. Name and ID Number of treatment facility 4. Signature of hauler 5. Signature of responsible party at source facility 5. Signature of responsible party at treatment facility 6. Signature of hauler and name of hauling firm A copy of the source facility hauling records for each shipment shall be provided upon delivery of the biosolids to the biosolids treatment facility or treatment facility. The treatment facility permittee shall report to the Department within 24 hours of discovery any discrepancy in the quantity of biosolids leaving the source facility and arriving at the biosolids treatment facility or treatment facility. [62-640.880(4)] 11. If the permittee intends to accept biosolids from other facilities, a permit revision is required pursuant to paragraph 62-640.880(2)(d), F.A.C. [62-640.880(2)(d)] III. GROUND WATER REQUIREMENTS 1. The permittee shall give at least 72-hours notice to the Department's South District Office, prior to the installation of any monitoring wells. [62-520.600(6)(h)] 2. Before construction of new ground water monitoring wells, a soil boring shall be made at each new monitoring well location to properly determine monitoring well specifications such as well depth, screen interval, screen slot, and filter pack. [62-520.600(6)(g)] 3. Within 30 days after installation of a monitoring well, the permittee shall submit to the Department's South District Office well completion reports and soil boring/lithologic logs on the attached DEP Form(s) 62- 520.900(3), Monitoring Well Completion Report. [62-520.600(6)(j) and .900(3)] 4. All piezometers and monitoring wells not part of the approved ground water monitoring plan shall be plugged and abandoned in accordance with Rule 62-532.500(5), F.A.C., unless future use is intended. [62-532.500(5)] 5. For the Part IV land application system(s), all ground water quality criteria specified in Chapter 62-520, F.A.C., shall be met at the edge of the zone of discharge. The zone of discharge for Land Application Site R-001 shall extend horizontally 100 feet from the application site and vertically to the base of the shallow water aquifer. [62-520.200(27)] [62-520.465] 6. The ground water minimum criteria specified in Rule 62-520.400 F.A.C., shall be met within the zone of discharge. [62-520.400 and 62-520.420(4)] 7. If the concentration for any constituent listed in Permit Condition III.10. in the natural background quality of the ground water is greater than the stated maximum, or in the case of pH is also less than the minimum, the representative background quality shall be the prevailing standard. [62-520.420(2)] 8. During the period of operation authorized by this permit, the permittee shall continue to sample ground water at the monitoring wells identified in Permit Condition III.9., below in accordance with this permit and the approved ground water monitoring plan prepared in accordance with Rule 62-520.600, F.A.C. [62-520.600] [62-610.510] 9 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P 9. The following monitoring wells shall be sampled for Reuse System R-001 located at Land Application Site RIB-001. Monitoring Well ID Alternate Well Name and/or Description of Monitoring Location Aquifer Monitored New or Existing MWC-20521 P-5 Compliance well located on the north end of the facilities property line. Surficial Existing MWC-20522 P-4 Compliance well located on the north end of the facilities property line. Surficial Existing MWC-20523 P-3 Compliance well located on the west end of the facilities property line. Surficial Existing MWC-20524 P-2 Compliance well located on the south end of the facilities property line. Surficial Existing MWC-20525 P-1 Compliance well located on the east end of the facilities property line. Surficial Existing MWC = Compliance; MWB = Background; MWI = Intermediate; MWP =Piezometer [62-520.600] [62-610.510] 10. The following parameters shall be analyzed for each monitoring well identified in Permit Condition III.9.: Parameter Compliance Well Limit Units Sample Type Monitoring Frequency Water Level Relative to NGVD Report ft In Situ Quarterly Arsenic, Total Recoverable 10 µg/L Grab Quarterly Cadmium, Total Recoverable 5 µg/L Grab Quarterly Chloride (as Cl) 250 mg/L Grab Quarterly Chromium, Total Recoverable 100 µg/L Grab Quarterly Coliform, Fecal 0 #/100mL Grab Quarterly Lead, Total Recoverable 15 µg/L Grab Quarterly Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) 10 mg/L Grab Quarterly Oxygen, Dissolved (DO) Report mg/L In Situ Quarterly pH 6.5-8.5 s.u. In Situ Quarterly Sodium, Total Recoverable 160 mg/L Grab Quarterly Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS) 500 mg/L Grab Quarterly Specific Conductance Report µmho/cm In Situ Quarterly Sulfate, Total 250 mg/L Grab Quarterly Temperature, water Report Degrees C In Situ Quarterly Turbidity Report NTU Grab Quarterly [62-520.600(11)(b)] [62-601.300(3), 62-601.700, and Figure 3 of 62-601] [62-601.300(6)] [62-520.310(5)] 11. Water levels shall be recorded before evacuating each well for sample collection. Elevation references shall include the top of the well casing and land surface at each well site (NAVD allowable) at a precision of plus or minus 0.01 foot. [62-520.600(11)(c)] [62-610.510(3)(b)] 12. Ground water monitoring wells shall be purged prior to sampling to obtain representative samples. [62- 160.210] [62-601.700(5)] 13. Analyses shall be conducted on unfiltered samples, unless filtered samples have been approved by the Department's South District Office as being more representative of ground water conditions. [62-520.310(5)] 14. Ground water monitoring test results shall be submitted on Part D of Form 62-620.910(10) in accordance with Permit Condition I.B.7. [62-520.600(11)(b)] [62-601.300(3), 62.601.700, and Figure 3 of 62-601] [62- 620.610(18)] 10 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P 15. If any monitoring well becomes inoperable or damaged to the extent that sampling or well integrity may be affected, the permittee shall notify the Department's South District Office within two business days from discovery, and a detailed written report shall follow within ten days after notification to the Department. The written report shall detail what problem has occurred and remedial measures that have been taken to prevent recurrence or request approval for replacement of the monitoring well. All monitoring well design and replacement shall be approved by the Department's South District Office before installation. [62-520.600(6)(l)] IV. ADDITIONAL REUSE AND LAND APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS A. Part IV Rapid Infiltration Basins 1. Advisory signs shall be posted around the site boundaries to designate the nature of the project area. [62- 610.518] 2. The maximum annual average loading rate to the percolation ponds (total area of 7 acres) shall be limited to 6.57 inches per day (as applied to the entire bottom area). [62-610.523(3)] 3. The percolation ponds normally shall be loaded for 1 - 7 days and shall be rested for 5 - 21 days. Infiltration ponds, basins, or trenches shall be allowed to dry during the resting portion of the cycle.[62-610.523(4)] 4. Rapid infiltration basins shall be routinely maintained to control vegetation growth and to maintain percolation capability by scarification or removal of deposited solids. Basin bottoms shall be maintained to be level. [62- 610.523(6) and (7)] 5. Routine aquatic weed control and regular maintenance of storage pond embankments and access areas are required. [62-610.514 and 62-610.414] 6. Overflows from emergency discharge facilities on storage ponds or on infiltration ponds, basins, or trenches shall be reported as abnormal events in accordance with Permit Condition IX.20. [62-610.800(9)] V. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS A. Staffing Requirements 1. During the period of operation authorized by this permit, the wastewater facilities shall be operated under the supervision of a(n) operator(s) certified in accordance with Chapter 62-602, F.A.C. In accordance with Chapter 62-699, F.A.C., this facility is a Category II, Class B facility and, at a minimum, operators with appropriate certification must be on the site as follows: A Class C or higher operator 16 hours/day for 7 days/week. The lead/chief operator must be a Class B operator, or higher. [62-620.630(3)][62 -699.310] 2. The lead/chief operator shall be employed at the plant full time. "Full time" shall mean at least 4 days per week, working a minimum of 35 hours per week, including leave time. A licensed operator shall be on-site and in charge of each required shift for periods of required staffing time when the lead/chief operator is not on-site. An operator meeting the lead/chief operator class for the treatment plant shall be available during all periods of plant operation. "Available" means able to be contacted as needed to initiate the appropriate action in a timely manner. [62-699.311(10), (6) and (1)] B. Capacity Analysis Report and Operation and Maintenance Performance Report Requirements 1. The application to renew this permit shall include an updated capacity analysis report prepared in accordance with Rule 62-600.405, F.A.C. [62-600.405(5)] 2. The application to renew this permit shall include a detailed operation and maintenance performance report prepared in accordance with Rule 62-600.735, F.A.C. [62-600.735(1)] 11 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P C. Recordkeeping Requirements 1. The permittee shall maintain the following records and make them available for inspection at the following address: Florida Governmental Utility Authority, 280 Wekiva Springs Road, Longwood (407) 629-6900, FL, 32779. a. Records of all compliance monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, including, if applicable, a copy of the laboratory certification showing the certification number of the laboratory, for at least three years from the date the sample or measurement was taken; b. Copies of all reports required by the permit for at least three years from the date the report was prepared; c. Records of all data, including reports and documents, used to complete the application for the permit for at least three years from the date the application was filed; d. Monitoring information, including a copy of the laboratory certification showing the laboratory certification number, related to the residuals use and disposal activities for the time period set forth in Chapter 62-640, F.A.C., for at least three years from the date of sampling or measurement; e. A copy of the current permit; f. A copy of the current operation and maintenance manual as required by Chapter 62-600, F.A.C.; g. A copy of any required record drawings; h. Copies of the licenses of the current certified operators; i. Copies of the logs and schedules showing plant operations and equipment maintenance for three years from the date of the logs or schedules. The logs shall, at a minimum, include identification of the plant; the signature and license number of the operator(s) and the signature of the person(s) making any entries; date and time in and out; specific operation and maintenance activities, including any preventive maintenance or repairs made or requested; results of tests performed and samples taken, unless documented on a laboratory sheet; and notation of any notification or reporting completed in accordance with Rule 62-602.650(3), F.A.C. The logs shall be maintained on-site in a location accessible to 24-hour inspection, protected from weather damage, and current to the last operation and maintenance performed; and j. Records of biosolids quantities, treatment, monitoring, and hauling for at least five years. [62-620.350, 62-602.650, 62-640.650(4)] VI. SCHEDULES 1. In accordance with section 403.088(2)(e) and (f), Florida Statutes, a compliance schedule for this facility is contained in Administrative Order AO-20150616-SD which is hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The permittee is not authorized to discharge to waters of the state after the expiration date of this permit, unless: a. The permittee has applied for renewal of this permit at least 180 days before the expiration date of this permit using the appropriate forms listed in Rule 62-620.910, F.A.C., and in the manner established in the Department of Environmental Protection Guide to Permitting Wastewater Facilities or Activities Under Chapter 62-620, F.A.C., including submittal of the appropriate processing fee set forth in Rule 62-4.050, F.A.C.; or b. The permittee has made complete the application for renewal of this permit before the permit expiration date. [62-620.335(1) - (4)] VII. INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 1. This facility is not required to have a pretreatment program at this time. [62-625.500] 12 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P VIII. OTHER SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. The permittee shall comply with the requirements of Rule 62-610.865, F.A.C., in the manner prescribed in the attached Administrative Order number AO-20150616-SD. 2. In the event that the treatment facilities or equipment no longer function as intended, are no longer safe in terms of public health and safety, or odor, noise, aerosol drift, or lighting adversely affects neighboring developed areas at the levels prohibited by Rule 62-600.400(2)(a), F.A.C., corrective action (which may include additional maintenance or modifications of the permitted facilities) shall be taken by the permittee. Other corrective action may be required to ensure compliance with rules of the Department. Additionally, the treatment, management, use or land application of residuals shall not cause a violation of the odor prohibition in Rule 62- 296.320(2), F.A.C. [62-600.410(8) and 62-640.400(6)] 3. The deliberate introduction of stormwater in any amount into collection/transmission systems designed solely for the introduction (and conveyance) of domestic/industrial wastewater; or the deliberate introduction of stormwater into collection/transmission systems designed for the introduction or conveyance of combinations of storm and domestic/industrial wastewater in amounts which may reduce the efficiency of pollutant removal by the treatment plant is prohibited, except as provided by Rule 62-610.472, F.A.C. [62-604.130(3)] 4. Collection/transmission system overflows shall be reported to the Department in accordance with Permit Condition IX. 20. [62-604.550] [62-620.610(20)] 5. The operating authority of a collection/transmission system and the permittee of a treatment plant are prohibited from accepting connections of wastewater discharges which have not received necessary pretreatment or which contain materials or pollutants (other than normal domestic wastewater constituents): a. Which may cause fire or explosion hazards; or b. Which may cause excessive corrosion or other deterioration of wastewater facilities due to chemical action or pH levels; or c. Which are solid or viscous and obstruct flow or otherwise interfere with wastewater facility operations or treatment; or d. Which result in the wastewater temperature at the introduction of the treatment plant exceeding 40oC or otherwise inhibiting treatment; or e. Which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapors, or fumes that may cause worker health and safety problems. [62-604.130(5)] 6. The treatment facility, storage ponds for Part II systems, rapid infiltration basins, and/or infiltration trenches shall be enclosed with a fence or otherwise provided with features to discourage the entry of animals and unauthorized persons. [62-610.518(1) and 62-600.400(2)(b)] 7. Screenings and grit removed from the wastewater facilities shall be collected in suitable containers and hauled to a Department approved Class I landfill or to a landfill approved by the Department for receipt/disposal of screenings and grit. [62-701.300(1)(a)] 8. Where required by Chapter 471 or Chapter 492, F.S., applicable portions of reports that must be submitted under this permit shall be signed and sealed by a professional engineer or a professional geologist, as appropriate. [62-620.310(4)] 9. The permittee shall provide verbal notice to the Department's South District Office as soon as practical after discovery of a sinkhole or other karst feature within an area for the management or application of wastewater, wastewater residuals (sludges), or reclaimed water. The permittee shall immediately implement measures appropriate to control the entry of contaminants, and shall detail these measures to the Department's South District Office in a written report within 7 days of the sinkhole discovery. [62-620.320(6)] 13 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P 10. The permittee shall provide notice to the Department of the following: a. Any new introduction of pollutants into the facility from an industrial discharger which would be subject to Chapter 403, F.S., and the requirements of Chapter 62-620, F.A.C., if it were directly discharging those pollutants; and b. Any substantial change in the volume or character of pollutants being introduced into that facility by a source which was identified in the permit application and known to be discharging at the time the permit was issued. Notice shall include information on the quality and quantity of effluent introduced into the facility and any anticipated impact of the change on the quantity or quality of effluent or reclaimed water to be discharged from the facility. [62-620.625(2) IX. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The terms, conditions, requirements, limitations, and restrictions set forth in this permit are binding and enforceable pursuant to Chapter 403, Florida Statutes. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of Chapter 403, Florida Statutes, and is grounds for enforcement action, permit termination, permit revocation and reissuance, or permit revision. [62-620.610(1)] 2. This permit is valid only for the specific processes and operations applied for and indicated in the approved drawings or exhibits. Any unauthorized deviations from the approved drawings, exhibits, specifications, or conditions of this permit constitutes grounds for revocation and enforcement action by the Department. [62- 620.610(2)] 3. As provided in subsection 403.087(7), F.S., the issuance of this permit does not convey any vested rights or any exclusive privileges. Neither does it authorize any injury to public or private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor authorize any infringement of federal, state, or local laws or regulations. This permit is not a waiver of or approval of any other Department permit or authorization that may be required for other aspects of the total project which are not addressed in this permit. [62-620.610(3)] 4. This permit conveys no title to land or water, does not constitute state recognition or acknowledgment of title, and does not constitute authority for the use of submerged lands unless herein provided and the necessary title or leasehold interests have been obtained from the State. Only the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund may express State opinion as to title. [62-620.610(4)] 5. This permit does not relieve the permittee from liability and penalties for harm or injury to human health or welfare, animal or plant life, or property caused by the construction or operation of this permitted source; nor does it allow the permittee to cause pollution in contravention of Florida Statutes and Department rules, unless specifically authorized by an order from the Department. The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge, reuse of reclaimed water, or residuals use or disposal in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. [62-620.610(5)] 6. If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after its expiration date, the permittee shall apply for and obtain a new permit. [62-620.610(6)] 7. The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain the facility and systems of treatment and control, and related appurtenances, that are installed and used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. This provision includes the operation of backup or auxiliary facilities or similar systems when necessary to maintain or achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit. [62-620.610(7)] 8. This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit revision, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition. [62-620.610(8)] 14 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P 9. The permittee, by accepting this permit, specifically agrees to allow authorized Department personnel, including an authorized representative of the Department and authorized EPA personnel, when applicable, upon presentation of credentials or other documents as may be required by law, and at reasonable times, depending upon the nature of the concern being investigated, to: a. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility, system, or activity is located or conducted, or where records shall be kept under the conditions of this permit; b. Have access to and copy any records that shall be kept under the conditions of this permit; c. Inspect the facilities, equipment, practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and d. Sample or monitor any substances or parameters at any location necessary to assure compliance with this permit or Department rules. [62-620.610(9)] 10. In accepting this permit, the permittee understands and agrees that all records, notes, monitoring data, and other information relating to the construction or operation of this permitted source which are submitted to the Department may be used by the Department as evidence in any enforcement case involving the permitted source arising under the Florida Statutes or Department rules, except as such use is proscribed by Section 403.111, F.S., or Rule 62-620.302, F.A.C. Such evidence shall only be used to the extent that it is consistent with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and applicable evidentiary rules. [62-620.610(10)] 11. When requested by the Department, the permittee shall within a reasonable time provide any information required by law which is needed to determine whether there is cause for revising, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with the permit. The permittee shall also provide to the Department upon request copies of records required by this permit to be kept. If the permittee becomes aware of relevant facts that were not submitted or were incorrect in the permit application or in any report to the Department, such facts or information shall be promptly submitted or corrections promptly reported to the Department. [62-620.610(11)] 12. Unless specifically stated otherwise in Department rules, the permittee, in accepting this permit, agrees to comply with changes in Department rules and Florida Statutes after a reasonable time for compliance; provided, however, the permittee does not waive any other rights granted by Florida Statutes or Department rules. A reasonable time for compliance with a new or amended surface water quality standard, other than those standards addressed in Rule 62-302.500, F.A.C., shall include a reasonable time to obtain or be denied a mixing zone for the new or amended standard. [62-620.610(12)] 13. The permittee, in accepting this permit, agrees to pay the applicable regulatory program and surveillance fee in accordance with Rule 62-4.052, F.A.C. [62-620.610(13)] 14. This permit is transferable only upon Department approval in accordance with Rule 62-620.340, F.A.C. The permittee shall be liable for any noncompliance of the permitted activity until the transfer is approved by the Department. [62-620.610(14)] 15. The permittee shall give the Department written notice at least 60 days before inactivation or abandonment of a wastewater facility or activity and shall specify what steps will be taken to safeguard public health and safety during and following inactivation or abandonment. [62-620.610(15)] 16. The permittee shall apply for a revision to the Department permit in accordance with Rules 62-620.300, F.A.C., and the Department of Environmental Protection Guide to Permitting Wastewater Facilities or Activities Under Chapter 62-620, F.A.C., at least 90 days before construction of any planned substantial modifications to the permitted facility is to commence or with Rule 62-620.325(2), F.A.C., for minor modifications to the permitted facility. A revised permit shall be obtained before construction begins except as provided in Rule 62-620.300, F.A.C. [62-620.610(16)] 17. The permittee shall give advance notice to the Department of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. The permittee shall be responsible for 15 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P any and all damages which may result from the changes and may be subject to enforcement action by the Department for penalties or revocation of this permit. The notice shall include the following information: a. A description of the anticipated noncompliance; b. The period of the anticipated noncompliance, including dates and times; and c. Steps being taken to prevent future occurrence of the noncompliance. [62-620.610(17)] 18. Sampling and monitoring data shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with Rule 62-4.246 and Chapters 62-160, 62-601, and 62-610, F.A.C., and 40 CFR 136, as appropriate. a. Monitoring results shall be reported at the intervals specified elsewhere in this permit and shall be reported on a Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR), DEP Form 62-620.910(10), or as specified elsewhere in the permit. b. If the permittee monitors any contaminant more frequently than required by the permit, using Department approved test procedures, the results of this monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the DMR. c. Calculations for all limitations which require averaging of measurements shall use an arithmetic mean unless otherwise specified in this permit. d. Except as specifically provided in Rule 62-160.300, F.A.C., any laboratory test required by this permit shall be performed by a laboratory that has been certified by the Department of Health Environmental Laboratory Certification Program (DOH ELCP). Such certification shall be for the matrix, test method and analyte(s) being measured to comply with this permit. For domestic wastewater facilities, testing for parameters listed in Rule 62-160.300(4), F.A.C., shall be conducted under the direction of a certified operator. e. Field activities including on-site tests and sample collection shall follow the applicable standard operating procedures described in DEP-SOP-001/01 adopted by reference in Chapter 62-160, F.A.C. f. Alternate field procedures and laboratory methods may be used where they have been approved in accordance with Rules 62-160.220, and 62-160.330, F.A.C. [62-620.610(18)] 19. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on, interim and final requirements contained in any compliance schedule detailed elsewhere in this permit shall be submitted no later than 14 days following each schedule date. [62-620.610(19)] 20. The permittee shall report to the Department's South District Office any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment. Any information shall be provided orally within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. A written submission shall also be provided within five days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain: a description of the noncompliance and its cause; the period of noncompliance including exact dates and time, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance. a. The following shall be included as information which must be reported within 24 hours under this condition: (1) Any unanticipated bypass which causes any reclaimed water or effluent to exceed any permit limitation or results in an unpermitted discharge, (2) Any upset which causes any reclaimed water or the effluent to exceed any limitation in the permit, (3) Violation of a maximum daily discharge limitation for any of the pollutants specifically listed in the permit for such notice, and (4) Any unauthorized discharge to surface or ground waters. b. Oral reports as required by this subsection shall be provided as follows: 16 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P (1) For unauthorized releases or spills of treated or untreated wastewater reported pursuant to subparagraph (a)4. that are in excess of 1,000 gallons per incident, or where information indicates that public health or the environment will be endangered, oral reports shall be provided to the STATE WARNING POINT TOLL FREE NUMBER (800) 320-0519, as soon as practical, but no later than 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the discharge. The permittee, to the extent known, shall provide the following information to the State Warning Point: (a) Name, address, and telephone number of person reporting; (b) Name, address, and telephone number of permittee or responsible person for the discharge; (c) Date and time of the discharge and status of discharge (ongoing or ceased); (d) Characteristics of the wastewater spilled or released (untreated or treated, industrial or domestic wastewater); (e) Estimated amount of the discharge; (f) Location or address of the discharge; (g) Source and cause of the discharge; (h) Whether the discharge was contained on-site, and cleanup actions taken to date; (i) Description of area affected by the discharge, including name of water body affected, if any; and (j) Other persons or agencies contacted. (2) Oral reports, not otherwise required to be provided pursuant to subparagraph b.1 above, shall be provided to the Department's South District Office within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. c. If the oral report has been received within 24 hours, the noncompliance has been corrected, and the noncompliance did not endanger health or the environment, the Department's South District Office shall waive the written report. [62-620.610(20)] 21. The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under Permit Conditions IX.17., IX.18., or IX.19. of this permit at the time monitoring reports are submitted. This report shall contain the same information required by Permit Condition IX.20. of this permit. [62-620.610(21)] 22. Bypass Provisions. a. "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment works. b. Bypass is prohibited, and the Department may take enforcement action against a permittee for bypass, unless the permittee affirmatively demonstrates that: (1) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage; and (2) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and (3) The permittee submitted notices as required under Permit Condition IX.22.c. of this permit. c. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice to the Department, if possible at least 10 days before the date of the bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass within 24 hours of learning about the bypass as required in Permit Condition IX.20. of this permit. A notice shall include a description of the bypass and its cause; the period of the bypass, including exact dates and times; if the bypass has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and the steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the bypass. d. The Department shall approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effect, if the permittee demonstrates that it will meet the three conditions listed in Permit Condition IX.22.b.(1) through (3) of this permit. e. A permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause reclaimed water or effluent limitations to be exceeded if it is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of Permit Condition IX.22.b. through d. of this permit. 17 PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP P.A. FILE NUMBER: FLA142140-017-DW1P 18 [62-620.610(22)] 23. Upset Provisions. a. "Upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology-based effluent limitations because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the permittee. (1) An upset does not include noncompliance caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, careless or improper operation. (2) An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of upset provisions of Rule 62-620.610, F.A.C., are met. b. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate, through properly signed contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: (1) An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset; (2) The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; (3) The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in Permit Condition IX.20. of this permit; and (4) The permittee complied with any remedial measures required under Permit Condition IX.5. of this permit. c. In any enforcement proceeding, the burden of proof for establishing the occurrence of an upset rests with the permittee. d. Before an enforcement proceeding is instituted, no representation made during the Department review of a claim that noncompliance was caused by an upset is final agency action subject to judicial review. [62-620.610(23)] Executed in Ft. Myers, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION for Jon M. Iglehart Director of District Management PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE: June 16, 2015 Attachment(s): Discharge Monitoring Report Monitor Well Completion Report Statement of Basis Administrative Order DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A When Completed mail this report to: Department of Environmental Protection, Compliance Assurance Program, 2295 Victoria Ave, Suite 364, Ft. Myers, FL 33901 PERMITTEE NAME: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MAILING ADDRESS: 280 Wekiva Springs Rd Longwood, Florida 32779 LIMIT: Final REPORT FREQUENCY: Monthly CLASS SIZE: N/A PROGRAM: Domestic FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: R-001 LOCATION: 4931 32nd Ave SW MONITORING GROUP DESCRIPTION: rapid infiltration basin, including Influent Naples, FL 34116 RE-SUBMITTED DMR: NO DISCHARGE FROM SITE: COUNTY: Collier MONITORING PERIOD From: ____________________ To: ____________________ OFFICE: South District Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Flow (to ponds) Sample Measurement PARM Code 50050 Y Mon. Site No. FLW-03 Permit Requirement 1.250 (An.Avg.) MGD Continuous Flow Totalizer Flow (to ponds) Sample Measurement PARM Code 50050 1 Mon. Site No. FLW-03 Permit Requirement Report (Mo.Avg.) MGD Continuous Flow Totalizer BOD, Carbonaceous 5 day, 20C Sample Measurement PARM Code 80082 Y Mon. Site No. EFA-01 Permit Requirement 20.0 (An.Avg.) mg/L Weekly 8-hr FPC BOD, Carbonaceous 5 day, 20C Sample Measurement PARM Code 80082 A Mon. Site No. EFA-01 Permit Requirement 60.0 (Max.) 45.0 (Max.Wk.Avg.) 30.0 (Mo.Avg.) mg/L Weekly 8-hr FPC Solids, Total Suspended Sample Measurement PARM Code 00530 Y Mon. Site No. EFA-01 Permit Requirement 20.0 (An.Avg.) mg/L Weekly 8-hr FPC Solids, Total Suspended Sample Measurement PARM Code 00530 A Mon. Site No. EFA-01 Permit Requirement 60.0 (Max.) 45.0 (Max.Wk.Avg.) 30.0 (Mo.Avg.) mg/L Weekly 8-hr FPC I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. NAME/TITLE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT TELEPHONE NO DATE (mm/dd/yyyy) COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OF ANY VIOLATIONS (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A (Continued) FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: R-001 PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MONITORING PERIOD From: _____________________ To: ________________ Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Coliform, Fecal Sample Measurement PARM Code 74055 Y Mon. Site No. EFA-01 Permit Requirement 200 (An.Avg.) #/100mL Weekly Grab Coliform, Fecal Sample Measurement PARM Code 74055 A Mon. Site No. EFA-01 Permit Requirement 200 (Mo.Geo.Mn.) 800 (Max.) #/100mL Weekly Grab pH Sample Measurement PARM Code 00400 A Mon. Site No. EFA-01 Permit Requirement 6.0 (Min.) 8.5 (Max.) s.u. Continuous Meter Chlorine, Total Residual (For Disinfection) Sample Measurement PARM Code 50060 A Mon. Site No. EFA-01 Permit Requirement 0.5 (Min.) mg/L Continuous Meter Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00620 A Mon. Site No. EFA-01 Permit Requirement 12.0 (Max.) mg/L Weekly 8-hr FPC Phosphorus, Total (as P) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00665 A Mon. Site No. EFA-01 Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Monthly Grab Nitrogen, Total Sample Measurement PARM Code 00600 A Mon. Site No. EFA-01 Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Monthly Grab Flow (concentrate) Sample Measurement PARM Code 50050 P Mon. Site No. FLW-04 Permit Requirement Report (An.Avg.) MGD Continuous Meter Flow (concentrate) Sample Measurement PARM Code 50050 Q Mon. Site No. FLW-04 Permit Requirement Report (Mo.Avg.) MGD Continuous Meter Flow (through treatment plant) Sample Measurement PARM Code 50050 R Mon. Site No. FLW-01 Permit Requirement 1.500 (An.Avg.) MGD Continuous Flow Totalizer ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A (Continued) FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: R-001 PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MONITORING PERIOD From: _____________________ To: ________________ Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Flow (through treatment plant) Sample Measurement PARM Code 50050 S Mon. Site No. FLW-01 Permit Requirement Report (Mo.Avg.) 1.800 (3-Mo.Avg.) MGD Continuous Flow Totalizer Percent Capacity, (TMADF/Permitted Capacity) x 100 Sample Measurement PARM Code 00180 P Mon. Site No. CAL-01 Permit Requirement Report (3-Mo.Avg.) percent Monthly Calculated Flow (to UIC well) Sample Measurement PARM Code 50050 T Mon. Site No. FLW-02 Permit Requirement 3,495 (Day.Max.) gal/min (GPM) Continuous Flow Totalizer BOD, Carbonaceous 5 day, 20C (Influent) Sample Measurement PARM Code 80082 G Mon. Site No. INF-01 Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Weekly 8-hr FPC Solids, Total Suspended (Influent) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00530 G Mon. Site No. INF-01 Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Weekly 8-hr FPC ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A When Completed mail this report to: Department of Environmental Protection, Compliance Assurance Program, 2295 Victoria Ave, Suite 364, Ft. Myers, FL 33901 PERMITTEE NAME: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MAILING ADDRESS: 280 Wekiva Springs Rd Longwood, Florida 32779 LIMIT: Final REPORT FREQUENCY: Monthly CLASS SIZE: N/A PROGRAM: Domestic FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: RMP-Q LOCATION: 4931 32nd Ave SW MONITORING GROUP DESCRIPTION: Biosolids Quantity Naples, FL 34116 RE-SUBMITTED DMR: NO DISCHARGE FROM SITE: COUNTY: Collier MONITORING PERIOD From: ____________________ To: ____________________ OFFICE: South District Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Biosolids Quantity (Landfilled) Sample Measurement PARM Code B0008 + Mon. Site No. RMP-01 Permit Requirement Report (Mo.Total) dry tons Monthly Calculated Biosolids Quantity (Transferred) Sample Measurement PARM Code B0007 + Mon. Site No. RMP-02 Permit Requirement Report (Mo.Total) dry tons Monthly Calculated I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. NAME/TITLE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT TELEPHONE NO DATE (mm/dd/yyyy) COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OF ANY VIOLATIONS (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A When Completed mail this report to: Department of Environmental Protection, Compliance Assurance Program, 2295 Victoria Ave, Suite 364, Ft. Myers, FL 33901 PERMITTEE NAME: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MAILING ADDRESS: 280 Wekiva Springs Rd Longwood, Florida 32779 LIMIT: Final REPORT FREQUENCY: Annually CLASS SIZE: N/A PROGRAM: Domestic FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: RWS-A LOCATION: 4931 32nd Ave SW MONITORING GROUP DESCRIPTION: Annual Reclaimed Water or Effluent Analysis Naples, FL 34116 RE-SUBMITTED DMR: NO DISCHARGE FROM SITE: MONITORING NOT REQUIRED: COUNTY: Collier MONITORING PERIOD From: ____________________ To: ____________________ OFFICE: South District Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Antimony, Total Recoverable (GWS = 6)* Sample Measurement PARM Code 01268 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Arsenic, Total Recoverable (GWS = 10) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00978 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Barium, Total Recoverable (GWS = 2,000) Sample Measurement PARM Code 01009 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Beryllium, Total Recoverable (GWS = 4) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00998 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Cadmium, Total Recoverable (GWS = 5) Sample Measurement PARM Code 01113 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Chromium, Total Recoverable (GWS =100) Sample Measurement PARM Code 01118 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC *GROUND WATER STANDARD (GWS) FOR REFERENCE AND REVIEW ONLY. I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. NAME/TITLE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT TELEPHONE NO DATE (mm/dd/yyyy) COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OF ANY VIOLATIONS (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A (Continued) FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: RWS-A PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MONITORING PERIOD From: _____________________ To: ________________ Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Cyanide, Free (amen. to chlorination)(GWS = 200) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00722 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab Fluoride, Total (as F) (GWS = 4.0/2.0) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00951 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Lead, Total Recoverable (GWS = 15) Sample Measurement PARM Code 01114 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Mercury, Total Recoverable (GWS = 2) Sample Measurement PARM Code 71901 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Nickel, Total Recoverable (GWS = 100) Sample Measurement PARM Code 01074 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) (GWS = 10) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00620 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Nitrogen, Nitrite, Total (as N) (GWS = 1) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00615 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Nitrite plus Nitrate, Total 1 det. (as N)(GWS = 10) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00630 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Selenium, Total Recoverable (GWS =50) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00981 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Sodium, Total Recoverable (GWS = 160) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00923 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually 24-hr FPC ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A (Continued) FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: RWS-A PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MONITORING PERIOD From: _____________________ To: ________________ Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Thallium, Total Recoverable (GWS = 2) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00982 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC 1,1-dichloroethylene (GWS = 7) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34501 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab 1,1,1-trichloroethane (GWS = 200) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34506 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab 1,1,2-trichloroethane (GWS = 5) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34511 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab 1,2-dichloroethane (GWS = 3) Sample Measurement PARM Code 32103 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab 1,2-dichloropropane (GWS = 5) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34541 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (GWS = 70) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34551 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Benzene (GWS = 1) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34030 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab Carbon tetrachloride (GWS = 3) Sample Measurement PARM Code 32102 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab Cis-1,2-dichloroethene (GWS = 70) Sample Measurement PARM Code 81686 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A (Continued) FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: RWS-A PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MONITORING PERIOD From: _____________________ To: ________________ Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Dichloromethane (methylene chloride)(GWS = 5) Sample Measurement PARM Code 03821 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab Ethylbenzene (GWS = 700) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34371 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab Monochlorobenzene (GWS = 100) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34031 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab 1,2-dichlorobenzene (GWS = 600) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34536 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab 1,4-dichlorobenzene (GWS = 75) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34571 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab Styrene, Total (GWS = 100) Sample Measurement PARM Code 77128 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab Tetrachloroethylene (GWS = 3) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34475 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab Toluene (GWS = 1,000) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34010 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab 1,2-trans-dichloroethylene (GWS = 100) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34546 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab Trichloroethylene (GWS = 3) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39180 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A (Continued) FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: RWS-A PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MONITORING PERIOD From: _____________________ To: ________________ Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Vinyl chloride (GWS = 1) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39175 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab Xylenes (GWS = 10,000) Sample Measurement PARM Code 81551 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p- dioxin(GWS = 3x10^-5) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34675 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (GWS = 70) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39730 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Silvex (GWS = 50) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39760 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Alachlor (GWS = 2) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39161 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Atrazine (GWS = 3) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39033 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Benzo(a)pyrene (GWS = 0.2) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34247 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Carbofuran (GWS = 40) Sample Measurement PARM Code 81405 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Chlordane (tech mix. and metabolites)(GWS = 2) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39350 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A (Continued) FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: RWS-A PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MONITORING PERIOD From: _____________________ To: ________________ Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Dalapon (GWS = 200) Sample Measurement PARM Code 38432 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate (GWS = 400) Sample Measurement PARM Code 77903 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (GWS = 6) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39100 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) (GWS = 0.2) Sample Measurement PARM Code 82625 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab Dinoseb (GWS = 7) Sample Measurement PARM Code 30191 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Diquat (GWS = 20) Sample Measurement PARM Code 04443 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Endothall (GWS = 100) Sample Measurement PARM Code 38926 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Endrin (GWS = 2) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39390 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Ethylene dibromide (1,2- dibromoethane)(GWS = 0.02) Sample Measurement PARM Code 77651 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually Grab Glyphosate (GWS = 0.7) Sample Measurement PARM Code 79743 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually 24-hr FPC ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A (Continued) FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: RWS-A PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MONITORING PERIOD From: _____________________ To: ________________ Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Heptachlor (GWS = 0.4) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39410 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Heptachlor epoxide (GWS = 0.2) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39420 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Hexachlorobenzene (GWS = 1) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39700 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (GWS = 50) Sample Measurement PARM Code 34386 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Gamma BHC (Lindane) (GWS = 0.2) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39782 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Methoxychlor (GWS = 40) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39480 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Oxamyl (vydate) (GWS = 200) Sample Measurement PARM Code 38865 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Pentachlorophenol (GWS = 1) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39032 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Picloram (GWS = 500) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39720 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)(GWS = 0.5) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39516 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A (Continued) FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: RWS-A PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MONITORING PERIOD From: _____________________ To: ________________ Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Simazine (GWS = 4) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39055 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Toxaphene (GWS = 3) Sample Measurement PARM Code 39400 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Trihalomethane, Total by summation(GWS = 0.080) Sample Measurement PARM Code 82080 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually Grab Radium 226 + Radium 228, Total (GWS = 5) Sample Measurement PARM Code 11503 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) pCi/L Annually 24-hr FPC Alpha, Gross Particle Activity (GWS = 15) Sample Measurement PARM Code 80045 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) pCi/L Annually 24-hr FPC Aluminum, Total Recoverable (GWS = 0.2) Sample Measurement PARM Code 01104 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Chloride (as Cl) (GWS = 250) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00940 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Iron, Total Recoverable (GWS = 0.3) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00980 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Copper, Total Recoverable (GWS = 1,000) Sample Measurement PARM Code 01119 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Manganese, Total Recoverable (GWS = 50) Sample Measurement PARM Code 11123 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT - PART A (Continued) FACILITY: Golden Gate WWTP MONITORING GROUP NUMBER: RWS-A PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 MONITORING PERIOD From: _____________________ To: ________________ Parameter Quantity or Loading Units Quality or Concentration Units No. Ex. Frequency of Analysis Sample Type Silver, Total Recoverable (GWS = 100) Sample Measurement PARM Code 01079 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Sulfate, Total (GWS = 250) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00945 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Zinc, Total Recoverable (GWS = 5,000) Sample Measurement PARM Code 01094 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) µg/L Annually 24-hr FPC pH (GWS = 6.5-8.5) Sample Measurement PARM Code 00400 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) s.u. Annually Grab Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS) (GWS = 500) Sample Measurement PARM Code 70295 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually 24-hr FPC Foaming Agents (GWS = 0.5) Sample Measurement PARM Code 01288 P Mon. Site No. RWS-A Permit Requirement Report (Max.) mg/L Annually 24-hr FPC ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DMR EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/01/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DAILY SAMPLE RESULTS - PART B Permit Number: FLA142140-017 Facility: Golden Gate WWTP Monitoring Period From: _____________________ To: _____________________ BOD, Carbonaceous 5 day, 20C mg/L Chlorine, Total Residual (For Disinfection) mg/L Coliform, Fecal #/100mL Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) mg/L Nitrogen, Total mg/L Phosphorus, Total (as P) mg/L Solids, Total Suspended mg/L pH s.u. Flow (thru plant) MGD Flow (to well) gal/min Flow (to ponds) MGD Code 80082 50060 74055 00620 00600 00665 00530 00400 50050 50050 50050 Mon. Site EFA-01 EFA-01 EFA-01 EFA-01 EFA-01 EFA-01 EFA-01 EFA-01 FLW-01 FLW-02 FLW-03 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Mo. Avg. PLANT STAFFING: Day Shift Operator Class: Certificate No: Name: Evening Shift Operator Class: Certificate No: Name: Night Shift Operator Class: Certificate No: Name: Lead Operator Class: Certificate No: Name: ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 DAILY SAMPLE RESULTS - PART B Permit Number: FLA142140-017 Facility: Golden Gate WWTP Monitoring Period From: _____________________ To: _____________________ Flow (concentrate) MGD BOD, Carbonaceous 5 day, 20C (Influent) mg/L Solids, Total Suspended (Influent) mg/L Code 50050 80082 00530 Mon. Site FLW-04 INF-01 INF-01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Total Mo. Avg. PLANT STAFFING: Day Shift Operator Class: Certificate No: Name: Evening Shift Operator Class: Certificate No: Name: Night Shift Operator Class: Certificate No: Name: Lead Operator Class: Certificate No: Name: ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - PART D Facility Name: Golden Gate WWTP Monitoring Well ID: MWC-20521 Permit Number: FLA142140-017 Well Type: Compliance Report Frequency: Quarterly County: Collier Description: Compliance monitoring well P-5. Program: Domestic Office: South District Re-submitted DMR: Monitoring Period From: ___________________ To: ___________________ Date Sample Obtained: ________ Time Sample Obtained: ________ Was the well purged before sampling? ___Yes ___ No Parameter PARM Code Sample Measurement Permit Requirement Units Sample Type Frequency of Analysis Detection Limits Analysis Method Sampling Equipment Used Samples Filtered (L/F/N) Water Level Relative to NGVD 82545 Report ft In Situ Quarterly Arsenic, Total Recoverable 00978 10 µg/L Grab Quarterly Cadmium, Total Recoverable 01113 5 µg/L Grab Quarterly Chloride (as Cl) 00940 250 mg/L Grab Quarterly Chromium, Total Recoverable 01118 100 µg/L Grab Quarterly Coliform, Fecal 74055 0 #/100mL Grab Quarterly Lead, Total Recoverable 01114 15 µg/L Grab Quarterly Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) 00620 10 mg/L Grab Quarterly Oxygen, Dissolved (DO) 00300 Report mg/L In Situ Quarterly pH 00400 6.5-8.5 s.u. In Situ Quarterly Sodium, Total Recoverable 00923 160 mg/L Grab Quarterly Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS) 70295 500 mg/L Grab Quarterly Specific Conductance 00095 Report µmhos/cm In Situ Quarterly Sulfate, Total 00945 250 mg/L Grab Quarterly Temperature (C), Water 00010 Report Deg C In Situ Quarterly I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. NAME/TITLE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT TELEPHONE NO DATE (mm/dd/yyyy) COMMENTS AND EXPLANATION (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - PART D (Continued) Facility Name: Golden Gate WWTP Monitoring Well ID: MWC-20521 Permit Number: FLA142140-017 Well Type: Compliance Report Frequency: Quarterly County: Collier Description: Compliance monitoring well P-5. Program: Domestic Office: South District Re-submitted DMR: Monitoring Period From: ___________________ To: ___________________ Date Sample Obtained: ________ Time Sample Obtained: ________ Was the well purged before sampling? ___Yes ___ No Parameter PARM Code Sample Measurement Permit Requirement Units Sample Type Frequency of Analysis Detection Limits Analysis Method Sampling Equipment Used Samples Filtered (L/F/N) Turbidity 00070 Report NTU Grab Quarterly COMMENTS AND EXPLANATION (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - PART D Facility Name: Golden Gate WWTP Monitoring Well ID: MWC-20522 Permit Number: FLA142140-017 Well Type: Compliance Report Frequency: Quarterly County: Collier Description: Compliance monitoring well P-4. Program: Domestic Office: South District Re-submitted DMR: Monitoring Period From: ___________________ To: ___________________ Date Sample Obtained: ________ Time Sample Obtained: ________ Was the well purged before sampling? ___Yes ___ No Parameter PARM Code Sample Measurement Permit Requirement Units Sample Type Frequency of Analysis Detection Limits Analysis Method Sampling Equipment Used Samples Filtered (L/F/N) Water Level Relative to NGVD 82545 Report ft In Situ Quarterly Arsenic, Total Recoverable 00978 10 µg/L Grab Quarterly Cadmium, Total Recoverable 01113 5 µg/L Grab Quarterly Chloride (as Cl) 00940 250 mg/L Grab Quarterly Chromium, Total Recoverable 01118 100 µg/L Grab Quarterly Coliform, Fecal 74055 0 #/100mL Grab Quarterly Lead, Total Recoverable 01114 15 µg/L Grab Quarterly Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) 00620 10 mg/L Grab Quarterly Oxygen, Dissolved (DO) 00300 Report mg/L In Situ Quarterly pH 00400 6.5-8.5 s.u. In Situ Quarterly Sodium, Total Recoverable 00923 160 mg/L Grab Quarterly Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS) 70295 500 mg/L Grab Quarterly Specific Conductance 00095 Report µmhos/cm In Situ Quarterly Sulfate, Total 00945 250 mg/L Grab Quarterly Temperature (C), Water 00010 Report Deg C In Situ Quarterly I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. NAME/TITLE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT TELEPHONE NO DATE (mm/dd/yyyy) COMMENTS AND EXPLANATION (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - PART D (Continued) Facility Name: Golden Gate WWTP Monitoring Well ID: MWC-20522 Permit Number: FLA142140-017 Well Type: Compliance Report Frequency: Quarterly County: Collier Description: Compliance monitoring well P-4. Program: Domestic Office: South District Re-submitted DMR: Monitoring Period From: ___________________ To: ___________________ Date Sample Obtained: ________ Time Sample Obtained: ________ Was the well purged before sampling? ___Yes ___ No Parameter PARM Code Sample Measurement Permit Requirement Units Sample Type Frequency of Analysis Detection Limits Analysis Method Sampling Equipment Used Samples Filtered (L/F/N) Turbidity 00070 Report NTU Grab Quarterly COMMENTS AND EXPLANATION (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - PART D Facility Name: Golden Gate WWTP Monitoring Well ID: MWC-20523 Permit Number: FLA142140-017 Well Type: Compliance Report Frequency: Quarterly County: Collier Description: Compliance monitoring well P-3. Program: Domestic Office: South District Re-submitted DMR: Monitoring Period From: ___________________ To: ___________________ Date Sample Obtained: ________ Time Sample Obtained: ________ Was the well purged before sampling? ___Yes ___ No Parameter PARM Code Sample Measurement Permit Requirement Units Sample Type Frequency of Analysis Detection Limits Analysis Method Sampling Equipment Used Samples Filtered (L/F/N) Water Level Relative to NGVD 82545 Report ft In Situ Quarterly Arsenic, Total Recoverable 00978 10 µg/L Grab Quarterly Cadmium, Total Recoverable 01113 5 µg/L Grab Quarterly Chloride (as Cl) 00940 250 mg/L Grab Quarterly Chromium, Total Recoverable 01118 100 µg/L Grab Quarterly Coliform, Fecal 74055 0 #/100mL Grab Quarterly Lead, Total Recoverable 01114 15 µg/L Grab Quarterly Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) 00620 10 mg/L Grab Quarterly Oxygen, Dissolved (DO) 00300 Report mg/L In Situ Quarterly pH 00400 6.5-8.5 s.u. In Situ Quarterly Sodium, Total Recoverable 00923 160 mg/L Grab Quarterly Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS) 70295 500 mg/L Grab Quarterly Specific Conductance 00095 Report µmhos/cm In Situ Quarterly Sulfate, Total 00945 250 mg/L Grab Quarterly Temperature (C), Water 00010 Report Deg C In Situ Quarterly I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. NAME/TITLE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT TELEPHONE NO DATE (mm/dd/yyyy) COMMENTS AND EXPLANATION (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - PART D (Continued) Facility Name: Golden Gate WWTP Monitoring Well ID: MWC-20523 Permit Number: FLA142140-017 Well Type: Compliance Report Frequency: Quarterly County: Collier Description: Compliance monitoring well P-3. Program: Domestic Office: South District Re-submitted DMR: Monitoring Period From: ___________________ To: ___________________ Date Sample Obtained: ________ Time Sample Obtained: ________ Was the well purged before sampling? ___Yes ___ No Parameter PARM Code Sample Measurement Permit Requirement Units Sample Type Frequency of Analysis Detection Limits Analysis Method Sampling Equipment Used Samples Filtered (L/F/N) Turbidity 00070 Report NTU Grab Quarterly COMMENTS AND EXPLANATION (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - PART D Facility Name: Golden Gate WWTP Monitoring Well ID: MWC-20524 Permit Number: FLA142140-017 Well Type: Compliance Report Frequency: Quarterly County: Collier Description: Compliance monitoring well P-2. Program: Domestic Office: South District Re-submitted DMR: Monitoring Period From: ___________________ To: ___________________ Date Sample Obtained: ________ Time Sample Obtained: ________ Was the well purged before sampling? ___Yes ___ No Parameter PARM Code Sample Measurement Permit Requirement Units Sample Type Frequency of Analysis Detection Limits Analysis Method Sampling Equipment Used Samples Filtered (L/F/N) Water Level Relative to NGVD 82545 Report ft In Situ Quarterly Arsenic, Total Recoverable 00978 10 µg/L Grab Quarterly Cadmium, Total Recoverable 01113 5 µg/L Grab Quarterly Chloride (as Cl) 00940 250 mg/L Grab Quarterly Chromium, Total Recoverable 01118 100 µg/L Grab Quarterly Coliform, Fecal 74055 0 #/100mL Grab Quarterly Lead, Total Recoverable 01114 15 µg/L Grab Quarterly Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) 00620 10 mg/L Grab Quarterly Oxygen, Dissolved (DO) 00300 Report mg/L In Situ Quarterly pH 00400 6.5-8.5 s.u. In Situ Quarterly Sodium, Total Recoverable 00923 160 mg/L Grab Quarterly Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS) 70295 500 mg/L Grab Quarterly Specific Conductance 00095 Report µmhos/cm In Situ Quarterly Sulfate, Total 00945 250 mg/L Grab Quarterly Temperature (C), Water 00010 Report Deg C In Situ Quarterly I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. NAME/TITLE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT TELEPHONE NO DATE (mm/dd/yyyy) COMMENTS AND EXPLANATION (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - PART D (Continued) Facility Name: Golden Gate WWTP Monitoring Well ID: MWC-20524 Permit Number: FLA142140-017 Well Type: Compliance Report Frequency: Quarterly County: Collier Description: Compliance monitoring well P-2. Program: Domestic Office: South District Re-submitted DMR: Monitoring Period From: ___________________ To: ___________________ Date Sample Obtained: ________ Time Sample Obtained: ________ Was the well purged before sampling? ___Yes ___ No Parameter PARM Code Sample Measurement Permit Requirement Units Sample Type Frequency of Analysis Detection Limits Analysis Method Sampling Equipment Used Samples Filtered (L/F/N) Turbidity 00070 Report NTU Grab Quarterly COMMENTS AND EXPLANATION (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - PART D Facility Name: Golden Gate WWTP Monitoring Well ID: MWC-20525 Permit Number: FLA142140-017 Well Type: Compliance Report Frequency: Quarterly County: Collier Description: Compliance monitoring well P-1. Program: Domestic Office: South District Re-submitted DMR: Monitoring Period From: ___________________ To: ___________________ Date Sample Obtained: ________ Time Sample Obtained: ________ Was the well purged before sampling? ___Yes ___ No Parameter PARM Code Sample Measurement Permit Requirement Units Sample Type Frequency of Analysis Detection Limits Analysis Method Sampling Equipment Used Samples Filtered (L/F/N) Water Level Relative to NGVD 82545 Report ft In Situ Quarterly Arsenic, Total Recoverable 00978 10 µg/L Grab Quarterly Cadmium, Total Recoverable 01113 5 µg/L Grab Quarterly Chloride (as Cl) 00940 250 mg/L Grab Quarterly Chromium, Total Recoverable 01118 100 µg/L Grab Quarterly Coliform, Fecal 74055 0 #/100mL Grab Quarterly Lead, Total Recoverable 01114 15 µg/L Grab Quarterly Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) 00620 10 mg/L Grab Quarterly Oxygen, Dissolved (DO) 00300 Report mg/L In Situ Quarterly pH 00400 6.5-8.5 s.u. In Situ Quarterly Sodium, Total Recoverable 00923 160 mg/L Grab Quarterly Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS) 70295 500 mg/L Grab Quarterly Specific Conductance 00095 Report µmhos/cm In Situ Quarterly Sulfate, Total 00945 250 mg/L Grab Quarterly Temperature (C), Water 00010 Report Deg C In Situ Quarterly I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. NAME/TITLE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT TELEPHONE NO DATE (mm/dd/yyyy) COMMENTS AND EXPLANATION (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT - PART D (Continued) Facility Name: Golden Gate WWTP Monitoring Well ID: MWC-20525 Permit Number: FLA142140-017 Well Type: Compliance Report Frequency: Quarterly County: Collier Description: Compliance monitoring well P-1. Program: Domestic Office: South District Re-submitted DMR: Monitoring Period From: ___________________ To: ___________________ Date Sample Obtained: ________ Time Sample Obtained: ________ Was the well purged before sampling? ___Yes ___ No Parameter PARM Code Sample Measurement Permit Requirement Units Sample Type Frequency of Analysis Detection Limits Analysis Method Sampling Equipment Used Samples Filtered (L/F/N) Turbidity 00070 Report NTU Grab Quarterly COMMENTS AND EXPLANATION (Reference all attachments here): ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE WASTEWATER DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT Read these instructions before completing the DMR. Hard copies and/or electronic copies of the required parts of the DMR were provided with the permit. All required information shall be completed in full and typed or printed in ink. A signed, original DMR shall be mailed to the address printed on the DMR by the 28th of the month following the monitoring period. Facilities who submit their DMR(s) electronically through eDMR do not need to submit a hardcopy DMR. The DMR shall not be submitted before the end of the monitoring period. The DMR consists of three parts--A, B, and D--all of which may or may not be applicable to every facility. Facilities may have one or more Part A's for reporting effluent or reclaimed water data. All domestic wastewater facilities will have a Part B for reporting daily sample results. Part D is used for reporting ground water monitoring well data. When results are not available, the following codes should be used on parts A and D of the DMR and an explanation provided where appropriate. Note: Codes used on Part B for raw data are different. CODE DESCRIPTION/INSTRUCTIONS CODE DESCRIPTION/INSTRUCTIONS ANC Analysis not conducted. NOD No discharge from/to site. DRY Dry Well OPS Operations were shutdown so no sample could be taken. FLD Flood disaster. OTH Other. Please enter an explanation of why monitoring data were not available. IFS Insufficient flow for sampling. SEF Sampling equipment failure. LS Lost sample. MNR Monitoring not required this period. When reporting analytical results that fall below a laboratory's reported method detection limits or practical quantification limits, the following instructions should be used, unless indicated otherwise in the permit or on the DMR: 1. Results greater than or equal to the PQL shall be reported as the measured quantity. 2. Results less than the PQL and greater than or equal to the MDL shall be reported as the laboratory's MDL value. These values shall be deemed equal to the MDL when necessary to calculate an average for that parameter and when determining compliance with permit limits. 3. Results less than the MDL shall be reported by entering a less than sign ("<") followed by the laboratory's MDL value, e.g. < 0.001. A value of one-half the MDL or one-half the effluent limit, whichever is lower, shall be used for that sample when necessary to calculate an average for that parameter. Values less than the MDL are considered to demonstrate compliance with an effluent limitation. PART A -DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (DMR) Part A of the DMR is comprised of one or more sections, each having its own header information. Facility information is preprinted in the header as well as the monitoring group number, whether the limits and monitoring requirements are interim or final, and the required submittal frequency (e.g. monthly, annually, quarterly, etc.). Submit Part A based on the required reporting frequency in the header and the instructions shown in the permit. The following should be completed by the permittee or authorized representative: Resubmitted DMR: Check this box if this DMR is being re-submitted because there was information missing from or information that needed correction on a previously submitted DMR. The information that is being revised should be clearly noted on the re-submitted DMR (e.g. highlight, circle, etc.) No Discharge From Site: Check this box if no discharge occurs and, as a result, there are no data or codes to be entered for all of the parameters on the DMR for the entire monitoring group number; however, if the monitoring group includes other monitoring locations (e.g., influent sampling), the "NOD" code should be used to individually denote those parameters for which there was no discharge. Monitoring Period: Enter the month, day, and year for the first and last day of the monitoring period (i.e. the month, the quarter, the year, etc.) during which the data on this report were collected and analyzed. Sample Measurement: Before filling in sample measurements in the table, check to see that the data collected correspond to the limit indicated on the DMR (i.e. interim or final) and that the data correspond to the monitoring group number in the header. Enter the data or calculated results for each parameter on this row in the non-shaded area above the limit. Be sure the result being entered corresponds to the appropriate statistical base code (e.g. annual average, monthly average, single sample maximum, etc.) and units. Data qualifier codes are not to be reported on Part A. No. Ex.: Enter the number of sample measurements during the monitoring period that exceeded the permit limit for each parameter in the non-shaded area. If none, enter zero. Frequency of Analysis: The shaded areas in this column contain the minimum number of times the measurement is required to be made according to the permit. Enter the actual number of times the measurement was made in the space above the shaded area. Sample Type: The shaded areas in this column contain the type of sample (e.g. grab, composite, continuous) required by the permit. Enter the actual sample type that was taken in the space above the shaded area. Signature: This report must be signed in accordance with Rule 62-620.305, F.A.C. Type or print the name and title of the signing official. Include the telephone number where the official may be reached in the event there are questions concerning this report. Enter the date when the report is signed. Comment and Explanation of Any Violations: Use this area to explain any exceedances, any upset or by-pass events, or other items which require explanation. If more space is needed, reference all attachments in this area. ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 PART B - DAILY SAMPLE RESULTS Monitoring Period: Enter the month, day, and year for the first and last day of the monitoring period (i.e. the month, the quarter, the year, etc.) during which the data on this report were collected and analyzed. Daily Monitoring Results: Transfer all analytical data from your facility's laboratory or a contract laboratory's data sheets for all day(s) that samples were collected. Record the data in the units indicated. Table 1 in Chapter 62-160, F.A.C., contains a complete list of all the data qualifier codes that your laboratory may use when reporting analytical results. However, when transferring numerical results onto Part B of the DMR, only the following data qualifier codes should be used and an explanation provided where appropriate. CODE DESCRIPTION/INSTRUCTIONS < The compound was analyzed for but not detected. A Value reported is the mean (average) of two or more determinations. J Estimated value, value not accurate. Q Sample held beyond the actual holding time. Y Laboratory analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly preserved sample. To calculate the monthly average, add each reported value to get a total. For flow, divide this total by the number of days in the month. For all other parameters, divide the total by the number of observations. Plant Staffing: List the name, certificate number, and class of all state certified operators operating the facility during the monitoring period. Use additional sheets as necessary. PART D - GROUND WATER MONITORING REPORT Monitoring Period: Enter the month, day, and year for the first and last day of the monitoring period (i.e. the month, the quarter, the year, etc.) during which the data on this report were collected and analyzed. Date Sample Obtained: Enter the date the sample was taken. Also, check whether or not the well was purged before sampling. Time Sample Obtained: Enter the time the sample was taken. Sample Measurement: Record the results of the analysis. If the result was below the minimum detection limit, indicate that. Data qualifier codes are not to be reported on Part D. Detection Limits: Record the detection limits of the analytical methods used. Analysis Method: Indicate the analytical method used. Record the method number from Chapter 62-160 or Chapter 62-601, F.A.C., or from other sources. Sampling Equipment Used: Indicate the procedure used to collect the sample (e.g. airlift, bucket/bailer, centrifugal pump, etc.) Samples Filtered: Indicate whether the sample obtained was filtered by laboratory (L), filtered in field (F), or unfiltered (N). Signature: This report must be signed in accordance with Rule 62-620.305, F.A.C. Type or print the name and title of the signing official. Include the telephone number where the official may be reached in the event there are questions concerning this report. Enter the date when the report is signed. Comments and Explanation: Use this space to make any comments on or explanations of results that are unexpected. If more space is needed, reference all attachments in this area. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR LIMITED WET WEATHER DISCHARGES Flow (Limited Wet Weather Discharge): Enter the measured average flow rate during the period of discharge or divide gallons discharged by duration of discharge (converted into days). Record in million gallons per day (MGD). Flow (Upstream): Enter the average flow rate in the receiving stream upstream from the point of discharge for the period of discharge. The average flow rate can be calculated based on two measurements; one made at the start and one made at the end of the discharge period. Measurements are to be made at the upstream gauging station described in the permit. Actual Stream Dilution Ratio: To calculate the Actual Stream Dilution Ratio, divide the average upstream flow rate by the average discharge flow rate. Enter the Actual Stream Dilution Ratio accurate to the nearest 0.1. No. of Days the SDF > Stream Dilution Ratio: For each day of discharge, compare the minimum Stream Dilution Factor (SDF) from the permit to the calculated Stream Dilution Ratio. On Part B of the DMR, enter an asterisk (*) if the SDF is greater than the Stream Dilution Ratio on any day of discharge. On Part A of the DMR, add up the days with an "*" and record the total number of days the Stream Dilution Factor was greater than the Stream Dilution Ratio. CBOD5: Enter the average CBOD5 of the reclaimed water discharged during the period shown in duration of discharge. TKN: Enter the average TKN of the reclaimed water discharged during the period shown in duration of discharge. Actual Rainfall: Enter the actual rainfall for each day on Part B. Enter the actual cumulative rainfall to date for this calendar year and the actual total monthly rainfall on Part A. The cumulative rainfall to date for this calendar year is the total amount of rain, in inches, that has been recorded since January 1 of the current year through the month for which this DMR contains data. Rainfall During Average Rainfall Year: On Part A, enter the total monthly rainfall during the average rainfall year and the cumulative rainfall for the average rainfall year. The cumulative rainfall for the average rainfall year is the amount of rain, in inches, which fell during the average rainfall year from January through the month for which this DMR contains data. No. of Days LWWD Activated During Calendar Year: Enter the cumulative number of days that the limited wet weather discharge was activated since January 1 of the current year. Reason for Discharge: Attach to the DMR a brief explanation of the factors contributing to the need to activate the limited wet weather discharge. ISSUANCE/REISSUANCE DATE: 06/16/2015 DEP Form 62-620.910(10), Effective Nov. 29, 1994 Page 1 of 2 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bob Martinez Center, 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 MONITORING WELL COMPLETION REPORT PART I: GENERAL INFORMATION Well ID: Site Name: Well Install Date Facility ID Alternate ID FLUWID # WMD Permit # Well Purpose Background Intermediate Compliance Other (explain) Latitude (to nearest 0.1 seconds) Longitude (to nearest 0.1 seconds) Latitude and Longitude collection method: DGPS AGPS MAP ZIPCODE DPHO UNKNOWN OTHER PART II: WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Contractor Name Contractor License # Company Name Construction Method: Hollow Stem Auger Solid Stem Auger Aquifer Monitored Water/Mud Rotary Air Rotary Cable Tool Direct Push Sonic Other (describe) Top of Casing Elevation (NVGD or NAVD) Ground Surface Elevation (NVGD or NAVD) Casing Material Inside Diameter Outside Diameter Depth (ft.) From To Screen Material Inside Diameter Outside Diameter Depth (ft.) Slot Size From To Annulus Material including additives for sealant Size of Material Amount (# of bags) Depth (ft.) Installation Method From To DEP Form # 62-520.900(3) Form Title MONITORING WELL COMPLETION REPORT Effective Date July 12, 2009 DEP Application No. (Filled in by DEP) Page 2 of 2 PART III: WELL DEVELOPMENT DETAILS Well Development Date Well Development Method: Surge/Pump Pump Compressed Air Other (explain) Development Duration Pumping Rate Maximum Drawdown Well Purged Dry Pumping Condition yes no continuous intermittent Turbidity (if Measured): Stabilized Water Level (BLS) Start: End: Water appearance (color and odor) at start of development: Water appearance (color and odor) at end of development: Report Prepared By: Date Title/Company License # PLEASE ATTACH BORING LOG Remarks STATEMENT OF BASIS FOR STATE OF FLORIDA DOMESTIC WASTEWATER FACILITY PERMIT PERMIT NUMBER: FLA142140-017 FACILITY NAME: Golden Gate WWTP FACILITY LOCATION: 4931 32nd Ave. SW, Naples, FL 34116 Collier County NAME OF PERMITTEE: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PERMIT WRITER: R. Walters 1. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION a. Chronology of Application Application Number: FLA142140-017-DW1P Application Submittal Date: 27 January 2015 b. Type of Facility Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plant Ownership Type: Private SIC Code: 4952 c. Facility Capacity Existing Permitted Capacity: 1.500 MGD Annual Average Daily Flow Proposed Increase in Permitted Capacity: 0.000 MGD Annual Average Daily Flow Proposed Total Permitted Capacity: 1.500 MGD Annual Average Daily Flow d. Description of Wastewater Treatment An existing 1.500 MGD, annual average daily flow (AADF) permitted capacity, complete mix activated sludge process domestic wastewater treatment facility. The facility's three-month average daily flow (TMADF) is limited to 1.800 MGD. The facility consists of: barscreens, a cyclone degritter, a 269,648-gallon equalization basin, a first anoxic zone of 70,000 gallons, a first aeration zone of 351,437 gallons, a first anaerobic zone of 141,062 gallons, a second aerobic zone of 150,000 gallons, a second anaerobic zone of 93,750 gallons, a reaeration zone of 32,680 gallons flowing into two clarifiers (2,827 sq.ft. and 1,810 sq.ft.), three chlorine contact chambers (19,100 gallons, 3,813 gallons, and 18,400 gallons), and a 3-stage digester tank (300,000 gallons). e. Description of Effluent Disposal and Land Application Sites (as reported by applicant) Secondary treated effluent discharged to percolation ponds, or disposed to an underground injection control (UIC) well number 263889-003-UO. Page 1 of 4 2. SUMMARY OF SURFACE WATER DISCHARGE This facility does not discharge to surface waters. 3. BASIS FOR PERMIT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS This facility is authorized to direct reclaimed water to Reuse System R-001, a rapid infiltration basin system, based on the following: Parameter Units Max/ Min Limit Statistical Basis Rationale Flow (to ponds) MGD Max 1.250 Annual Average 62-600.400(3)(b) & 62-610.810(5) FAC Max Report Monthly Average 62-600.400(3)(b) & 62-610.810(5) FAC BOD, Carbonaceous 5 day, 20C mg/L Max 20.0 Annual Average 62-610.510 & 62-600.740(1)(b)1.a. FAC Max 30.0 Monthly Average 62-600.740(1)(b)1.b. FAC Max 45.0 Weekly Average 62-600.740(1)(b)1.c. FAC Max 60.0 Single Sample 62-600.740(1)(b)1.d. FAC Solids, Total Suspended mg/L Max 20.0 Annual Average 62-610.510 & 62-600.740(1)(b)1.a. FAC Max 30.0 Monthly Average 62-600.740(1)(b)1.b. FAC Max 45.0 Weekly Average 62-600.740(1)(b)1.c. FAC Max 60.0 Single Sample 62-600.740(1)(b)1.d. FAC Coliform, Fecal #/100mL Max 200 Monthly Geometric Mean 62-600.440(4)(c)2. FAC Max 200 Annual Average 62-610.510 & 62-600.440(4)(c)1. FAC Max 800 Single Sample 62-600.440(4)(c)4. FAC pH s.u. Min 6.0 Single Sample 62-600.445 FAC Max 8.5 Single Sample 62-600.445 FAC Chlorine, Total Residual (For Disinfection) mg/L Min 0.5 Single Sample 62-610.510 & 62-600.440(4)(b) FAC Nitrogen, Nitrate, Total (as N) mg/L Max 12.0 Single Sample 62-610.510(1) FAC Phosphorus, Total (as P) mg/L Max Report Single Sample 62-601.300(6) FAC Nitrogen, Total mg/L Max Report Single Sample 62-601.300(6) FAC Flow (Concentrate) MGD Max Report Annual Average 62-600.400(3)(b) & 62-610.810(5) FAC Max Report Monthly Average 62-600.400(3)(b) & 62-610.810(5) FAC Other Limitations and Monitoring Requirements: Parameter Units Max/ Min Limit Statistical Basis Rationale Flow (to UIC well) gal/min Max 3,495 Daily Maximum 62-528.425(1)(g) and 62-528.430(2), F.A.C Flow (Influent) MGD Max 1.500 Annual Average 62-600.400(3)(b) FAC Max 1.800 Three-Month Average 62-600.400(3)(b) FAC Max Report Monthly Average 62-600.400(3)(b) FAC Page 2 of 4 Parameter Units Max/ Min Limit Statistical Basis Rationale Flow (to UIC well) gal/min Max 3,495 Daily Maximum 62-528.425(1)(g) and 62-528.430(2), F.A.C Percent Capacity, (TMADF/Permitted Capacity) x 100 percent Max Report Three-Month Average 62-600.405(4) FAC BOD, Carbonaceous 5 day, 20C (Influent) mg/L Max Report Single Sample 62-601.300(1) FAC Solids, Total Suspended (Influent) mg/L Max Report Single Sample 62-601.300(1) FAC Monitoring Frequencies and Sample Types - - - All Parameters 62-601 FAC & 62-699 FAC and/or BPJ of permit writer Sampling Locations - - - All Parameters 62-601, 62-610.412, 62-610.463(1), 62- 610.568, 62-610.613 FAC and/or BPJ of permit writer 4. DISCUSSION OF CHANGES TO PERMIT LIMITATIONS The flow into the wastewater treatment facility is limited to a maximum 1.800 MGD on a three-month average daily flow basis (TMADF). 5. BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS Biosolids generated by this facility may be transferred to Charlotte County Bio-Recycling Center, or disposed of in a Class I solid waste landfill. See the table below for the rationale for the biosolids quantities monitoring requirements. Parameter Units Max/ Min Limit Statistical Basis Rationale Biosolids Quantity (Landfilled) dry tons Max Report Monthly Total 62-640.650(5)(a)1. FAC Biosolids Quantity (Transferred) dry tons Max Report Monthly Total 62-640.650(5)(a)1. FAC Monitoring Frequency All Parameters 62-640.650(5)(a) FAC 6. GROUND WATER MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Ground water monitoring requirements have been established in accordance with Chapters 62-520, 532, 601, 610, and 620, F.A.C. 7. PERMIT SCHEDULES This permit contains a schedule of Improvement Actions. See the AO referenced in item 9 of this Statement of Basis. 8. INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 At this time, the facility is not required to develop an approved industrial pretreatment program. However, the Department reserves the right to require an approved program if future conditions warrant. 9. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (AO) AND CONSENT ORDERS (CO) This permit is accompanied by an AO with the Department. The AO number is AO-20150616-SD. 10. REQUESTED VARIANCES OR ALTERNATIVES TO REQUIRED STANDARDS No variances were requested for this facility. 11. THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD The administrative record including application, request for information, comments received and additional information is available for public inspection during normal business hours at the location specified in item 12. Copies will be provided at a charge per page. 12. DEP CONTACT Additional information concerning the permit and proposed schedule for permit issuance may be obtained during normal business hours from: R. Walters Engineering Specialist South District Office 2295 Victoria Ave., Suite 364 Ft. Myers, FL 33901 Telephone No.: (239) 344-5600 Page 4 of 4 BEFORE THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION IN THE MATTER OF: IN THE OFFICE OF THE SOUTH DISTRICT Florida Governmental Utility Authority Administrative Order No.: AO-20150616-SD Robert Dickson, Capital Program Manager DEP Permit No.: FLA142140-017 280 Wekiva Springs Rd. DEP File No.: FLA142140-017-DW1P Longwood, Florida 32779 Email: rdickson@govmserv.com _____________________________/ ORDER ESTABLISHING COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE UNDER SECTION 403.088(2)(f) OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES I. STATUTORY AUTHORITY The Department of Environmental Protection (the “Department”) issues this order under the authority of section 403.088 of the Florida Statutes (the "F.S."). The Secretary of the Department has delegated this authority to the Director of District Management, who issues this order and makes the following findings of fact. II. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Florida Governmental Utility Authority (the "FGUA") is a person under section 403.031, F.S. 2. The FGUA owns and operates a domestic wastewater treatment plant located at 4931 Thirty- second Ave. S.W., in Collier County, Florida, aka Golden Gate WWTP, which discharges treated domestic wastewater into waters of the state as defined in section 403.031, F.S. 3. The FGUA has applied for a permit to operate the Golden Gate WWTP under section 403.088(2), F.S. 4. Regarding the Golden Gate WWTP, permit number FLA142140-017, FGUA has not provided reasonable assurance that the construction, modification, or operation of the wastewater facility or activity will be in accordance with applicable statutes or rules at the time of permit issuance. The WWTP will not meet the Department’s permitting requirements of Rule 62-610.865, F.A.C., for the blending of demineralization concentrate with the reclaimed water and discharged to land Page 1 of 5 application system R-001. Also, the O&M Performance Report documented other important necessary preventative measures. 5. Sections 403.088(2)(e) and (f), F.S., authorize the Department to issue a permit for the discharge of wastes into waters of the state, accompanied by an order establishing a schedule for achieving compliance with all permit conditions if specified criteria are met. 6. The Department finds that the granting of an operation permit will be in the public interest. III. ORDER Based on the foregoing findings of fact, IT IS ORDERED, 1. The FGUA shall complete the following required Improvement Actions at the Golden Gate WWTP by the following required completion dates: Required Improvement Action Required Completion Date 1. Provide the Department a revised and accurate Process Flow Diagram that includes the demineralization concentrate line to the effluent pump station. July 31, 2015 2. In accordance with the table contained in Section 6 on page 27 of the revised O&M Performance Report, the permittee shall conduct inspections for rust, and evaluate and catalog the areas of urgency for repair. July 3 1, 2015 3. The permittee shall complete repair to the rusted parts cataloged for urgency pursuant to item III.1.2 of this AO- 20150616-SD. January 31, 2016 4. The permittee shall install and calibrate a flow measuring device designed to accurately measure the flow from the effluent pump station to the percolation ponds R-001. January 31, 2016 5. Regarding the blending of demineralization concentrate with reclaimed water: the permittee shall either obtain a variance which grants relief from Rule 62-610.865, F.A.C., or shall fully comply with Rule 62-610.865, F.A.C., which requires an engineering report, evaluation of vegetation tolerance, additional parameter limits, an enforceable blending ratio, continuous monitoring equipment, and other specific requirements. (The Department understands that blending concentrate with reclaimed water is done very infrequently and that FGUA might choose to petition for variance relief from strict application of the rule requirements.) June 30, 2016 Page 2 of 5 For reference: the following links provide information on the Chapter 120 variance process and how to prepare a petition: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String= &URL=0100-0199/0120/Sections/0120.542.html https://www.flrules.org/gateway/readFile.asp?sid=0&tid=0&cno=28- 104&caid=272199&type=4&file=28-104.doc 2. The FGUA shall maintain and operate its facilities in compliance with all other conditions of the Department Permit No. FLA142140-017. 3. This order may be modified through revisions as set forth in chapter 62-620, F.A.C. 4. Reports or other information required by this order shall be sent to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 2295 Victoria Ave., Suite 364, Fort Myers, Florida 33901. 5. This order does not operate as a permit under section 403.088, F.S. This order shall be incorporated by reference into the Department Permit No. FLA142140-017, which shall require compliance by the permittee with the requirements of this order. 6. Failure to comply with the requirements of this order shall constitute a violation of this order and Department Permit No. FLA142140-017, and may subject the permittee to penalties as provided in section 403.161, F.S. IV. NOTICE OF RIGHTS A person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department’s proposed permitting decision may petition for an administrative proceeding (hearing) under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. The petition must contain the information set forth below and must be filed (received by the clerk) in the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399- 3000. Petitions by the applicant or any of the parties listed below must be filed within 14 days of receipt of this written notice. Petitions filed by any persons other than those entitled to written notice under Section 120.60(3), F.S., must be filed within 14 days of publication of the notice or within 14 days of receipt of the written notice, whichever occurs first. Under Section 120.60(3), F.S., however, any person who has asked the Department for notice of agency action may file a petition within 14 days of receipt of such notice, regardless of the date of publication. The petitioner shall mail a copy of the petition to the applicant at the address indicated above at the time of Page 3 of 5 filing. The failure of any person to file a petition within the appropriate time period shall constitute a waiver of that person’s right to request an administrative determination (hearing) under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Any subsequent intervention (in a proceeding initiated by another party) will be only at the discretion of the presiding officer upon the filing of a motion in compliance with Rule 28-106.205, F.A.C. A petition that disputes the material facts on which the Department’s action is based must contain the following information: (a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency's file or identification number, if known; (b) The name, address, any e-mail address, any facsimile number, and telephone number of the petitioner, if the petitioner is not represented by an attorney or a qualified representative; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner's representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding; and an explanation of how the petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the determination; (c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the Department's decision; (d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate; (e) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the Department's proposed action; (f) A statement of the specific rules or statutes the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the Department's proposed action, including an explanation of how the alleged facts relate to the specific rules or statutes; and (g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action petitioner wishes the Department to take with respect to the Department's proposed action. A petition that does not dispute the material facts on which the Department’s action is based shall state that no such facts are in dispute and otherwise shall contain the same information as set forth above, as required by Rule 28-106.301. Because the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate final agency action, the filing of a petition means that the Department’s final action may be different from the position taken by it in this notice. Page 4 of 5 Page 5 of 5 Persons whose substantial interests will be affected by any such final decision of the Department have the right to petition to become a party to the proceeding, in accordance with the requirements set forth above. Mediation under Section 120.573, F.S., is not available for this proceeding. This action is final and effective on the date filed with the Clerk of the Department unless a petition is filed in accordance with the above. Upon the timely filing of a petition this order will not be effective until further order of the Department. Any party to the order has the right to seek judicial review of the order under section 120.68 of the Florida Statutes, by the filing of a notice of appeal under rule 9.110 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure with the Clerk of the Department in the Office of General Counsel, Mail Station 35, at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-3000; and by filing a copy of the notice of appeal accompanied by the applicable filing fees with the appropriate district court of appeal. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days from the date when the final order is filed with the Clerk of the Department. DONE AND ORDERED on this 16th day of June 2015, in Fort Myers, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION for Jon M. Iglehart Director of District Management CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned duly designated deputy agency clerk hereby certifies that this Order and all copies were mailed before the close of business on June 16, 2015, to the listed persons. FILED AND ACKNOWLEDGED on this date, under Section 120.52(11) of the Florida Statutes, with the designated Department Clerk, receipt of which is acknowledged. Clerk June 16, 2015 Date Copies Furnished to: Wade Wood P.E.; via email (wwood@cphengineers.com) Peter Hernandez; via email (phernandez@cphcorp.com) Diane Loughlin, DEP--Fort Myers; via email. Douglas Meurer; via email (DMeurer@leegov.com) Deanna Newburg, DEP—Fort Myers; via email. Ron Walters, DEP—Fort Myers; via email. # FLORldA Florida Department of Environmental Protectionp==, ^ MJ( ii[^ihi.ii'""'itiiiir~^ ffi(Aiii^i»'°^ni» South District P.O. Box 2549 Fort Myers, FL 33902-2549 In the Matter of an Application for Permit by: Mr. Tarek Fahmy, P.E., C.G.C., Director of Operations Florida Governmental Utility Authority 280 Wekiva Springs Road; Suite 2000 Longwood, FL 32779 tfahmv@govmserv.com ntered into Charlie Crist Governor Jefi'Kottkamp mor Sole Secretary South District DEPFileNc: 5110117 Collier Countv-PW Golden Gate WTP - Minor Modification to Comply with 4 - Log Treatment Southwest Coast EMA NOTICE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE Enclosed is Permit Number 0164778-005-WC to construct the subject minor modification to the existing 2.099 MGD water treatment plant, issued under section 403.861(9), of the Florida Statutes. The Department's proposed agency action shall become final unless a timely petition for an administrative hearing is filed under sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes before the deadline for filing a petition. The procedures for petitioning for a hearing are set forth below. A person whose substantial interests are affected by the Department's proposed permitting decision may petition for an administrative proceeding (hearing) under sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes. The petition must contain the information set forth below and must be filed (received by the clerk) in the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000. Petitions by the applicant or any of the parties listed below must be filed within fourteen days of receipt of this written notice. Petitions filed by any persons other than those entitled to written notice under section 120.60(3) of the Florida Statutes must be filed within fourteen days of publication of the notice or within fourteen days of receipt of the written notice, whichever occurs first. Under section 120.60(3) of the Florida Statutes, however, any person who has asked the Department for notice of agency action may file a petition within fourteen days of receipt of such notice, regardless of the date of publication. The petitioner shall mail a copy of the petition to the applicant at the address indicated above at the time of filing. The failure of any person to file a petition or request for mediation within the appropriate time period shall constitute a waiver of that person's right to request an administrative determination Page 1 of3 (hearing) under sections 120^P and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes. AnyiBsequent intervention (in a proceeding initiated by another party) will be only at the discretion of the presiding officer upon the filing of a motion in compliance with rule 28-106.205 of the Florida Administrative Code. A petition that disputes the material facts on which the Department's action is based must contain the following information: a. The name, address, and telephone number of each petitioner; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner' s representative, if any; the Department permit identification number and the county in which the subject matter or activity is located; b. A statement of how and when each petitioner received notice of the Department action; c. A statement of how each petitioner's substantial interests is affected by the Department action; d. A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate; e. A statement of facts that the petitioner contends warrants reversal or modification of the Department action; f A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, as well as the rules and statutes which entitle the petitioner to relief; and g. A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action that the petitioner wants the Department to take. A petition that does not dispute the material facts on which the Department's action is based shall state that no such facts are in dispute and otherwise shall contain the same information as set forth above, as required by rule 28-106.301. Because the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate final agency action, the filing of a petition means that the Department's final action may be different from the position taken by it in this notice. Persons whose substantial interests will be affected by any such final decision of the Department have the right to petition to become a party to the proceeding, in accordance with the requirements set forth above. In addition to requesting an administrative hearing, any petitioner may elect to pursue mediation. The election may be accomplished by filing with the Department a mediation agreement with all parties to the proceeding (i.e., the applicant, the Department, and any person who has filed a timely and sufficient petition for a hearing). The agreement must contain all the information required by rule 28-106.404. The agreement must be received by the clerk in the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000, within ten days after the deadline for filing a petition, as set forth above. Choosing mediation will not adversely affect the right to a hearing if mediation does not result in a settlement. As provided in section 120.573 of the Florida Statutes, the timely agreement of all parties to mediate will toll the time limitations imposed by sections 120.569 and 120.57 for holding an administrative hearing and issuing a final order. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the mediation must be concluded within sixty days of the execution of the agreement. If mediation results in settlement of the administrative dispute, the Department must enter a final order incorporating the agreement of the parties. Persons seeking to protect their substantial interests that would be affected by such a modified final decision must file their petitions within fourteen days of receipt of this notice, or they shall be deemed to have waived their right to a proceeding under sections 120.569 and 120.57. If mediation terminates Page 2 of 3 without settlement of the dilfBre, the Department shall notify all parties Hinting that the administrative hearing processes under sections 120.569 and 120.57 remain available for disposition of the dispute, and the notice will specify the deadlines that then will apply for challenging the agency action and electing remedies under those two statutes. This action is final and effective on the date filed with the Clerk of the Department unless a petition (or request for mediation) is filed in accordance with the above. Upon the timely filing of a petitiori (or request for mediation) this order will not be effective until fiirther order of the Department. Any party to the order has the right to seek judicial review of the order imder section 120.68 of the Florida Statutes, by the filing of a notice of appeal under rule 9.110 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure with the Clerk of the Department in the Office of General Counsel, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-3000; and by filing a copy of the notice of appeal accompanied by the applicable filing fees with the appropriate district court of appeal. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days from the date when the final order is filed with the Clerk of the Department. Executed in Fort Myers, Florida. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Jon M. Iglefhart Director of District Management CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned duly designated clerk hereby certifies that this NOTICE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE and all copies were mailed before the close of business on April ( , 2010 to the listed persons. FILING AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT FILED, on this date, under section 120.52(7), Florida Statutes, with the designated Department Clerk, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. ^ir^r\^AAJL.S .QXJLUA^ ^-I'l^ Clerk Date JMI/BTS Enclosure Copy provided to: Brad Mcmahen, P.E. BSMcMahen@pbsi.com Scoot Richards, E.I. MSRichards(a)pbsi .com Page 3 of 3 FLORldA^ i Florida Department of Environmental Protection South District P.O. Box 2549 Fort Myers, FL 33902-2549 PERMITTEE: Mr. Tarek Fahmy, P.E., C.G.C. Director of Operations Florida Governmental Utility Authority 280 Wekiva Springs Road; Suite 2000 Longwood, FL 32779 Charlie Crist Governor JeffKottkamp Lt. Governor Michael W. Sole Secretary I.D. No: 5110117 Permit/Cert. No.: 0164778-005-WC Permit Date Issue: April 1, 2010 Expiration Date: March 31, 2015 County: Collier Section/Town/Range: 27/49S/26E Latitude/Longitude: 26° 10' 45"N/81° 41'45"W Project: Golden Gate WTP - Minor Modification to Comply with 4 - Log Treatment Southwest Coast EMA This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 403, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Rules 62-4, 62-550, 62-555 and 62-699. The above named permittee is hereby authorized to perform the work or operate the facility shown on the application and approved drawing(s), plans, and other documents, attached hereto or on file with the Department and made a part hereof and specifically described as follows: Construct improvement to the existing 2.099 MGD water treatment plant with finished water from both the membrane treatment plant and the lime softening treatment plant for the design maximum day water demand with installation of the following: The replacement of the existing 2,300 gallon chlorine contact tank with a new 16-inch diameter cement lined ductile iron pipe (DIP). The pipeline consists of 220 feet in total length, with a 195 feet minimum for "effective contact piping" between the chlorine injector/static mixer and the chlorine residual monitor. This will provide a minimum of 2,200 gallon of contact time volume to meet the 4 - Log treatment at the rated flow for the facility as depicted on PBS&J, Inc., design drawings, sheet numbers G-1, G-2, C-1, D- 1, thru D-3, dated March 26, 2010. The engineering report and design drawings were submitted in support of the construction application. The application was dated February 26, 2010 and received March 2, 2010. Related document to reduce the potential Disinfection Byproducts (DBFs), in the system was dated March 26, and received March 29, 2010. The project is located at 4300 Golden Gate Parkway, in Golden Gate, Collier County, Florida. Page 1 of5 PERMITTEE: Mr. Tarek Fahmy, P.E., C.( Director of Operations Florida Governmental Utility Authority GENERAL CONDITIONS: I.D. No: 51101^ ^^'^ Permit/Cert. N^Ol 64778^-WC Permit Date Issue: April 1, 2010 Expiration Date: March 31,2015 1. The terms, conditions, requirements, limitations, and restrictions set forth in this permit are "permit conditions" and are binding and enforceable pursuant to Sections 403.141, 403.727, or 403.859 through 403.861, F.S. The permittee is placed on notice that the Department will review this permit periodically and may initiate enforcement action for any violation of these conditions. 2. This permit is valid only for the specific processes and operations applied for and indicated in the approved drawings or exhibits. Any unauthorized deviation from the approved drawings, exhibits, specifications, or conditions of this permit may constitute grounds for revocation and enforcement action by the Department. 3. As provided in Subsections 403.087(6) and 403.722(5) F.S., the issuance of this permit does not convey any vested rights or any exclusive privileges. Neither does it authorize any injury to public or private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, state or local laws or regulations. This permit is not a waiver of or approval of any other Department permit that may be required for other aspects of the total project which are not addressed in the permit. 4. This permit conveys no title to land or water, does not constitute State recognition or acknowledgment of title, and does not constitute authority for the use of submerged lands unless herein provided and the necessary title or leasehold interests have been obtained from the State. Only the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund may express State opinion as to title. 5. This permit does not relieve the permittee from liability for harm or injury to human health or welfare, animal, or plant life, or property caused by the construction or operation of this permitted source, or from penalties therefore; nor does it allow the permittee to cause pollution in contravention of Florida Statutes and Department rules, unless specifically authorized by any order from the Department. 6. The permittee shall properly operate and maintain the facility and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) that are installed and used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit, as required by Department rules. This provision includes the operation of backup or auxiliary facilities or similar systems when necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit and when required by Department rules. 7. The permittee, by accepting this permit, specifically agrees to allow authorized Department personnel, upon presentation of credential or other documents as may be required by law, and at reasonable times, access to the premises where the permitted activity is located or conducted to: a. Have access to and copy any records that must be kept under the conditions of the permit; b. Inspect the facility, equipment, practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and c. Sample or monitor any substances or parameters at any location reasonably necessary to assure compliance with this permit or Department rules. Reasonable time may depend on the nature of the concern being investigated. 8. If, for any reason, the permittee does not comply with or will be unable to comply with any condition or limitation specified in this permit, the permittee shall immediately provide the Department with the following information: Page 2 of 5 PERMITTEE: Mr. Tarek Fahmy, P.E., C.( Director of Operations Florida Governmental Utility Authority GENERAL CONDITIONS; I.D.No:5110]J|| 0^^ Permit/Cert. N^0164778-M-WC Permit Date Issue: April 1, 2010 Expiration Date: March 31, 2015 a. A description of and cause of non-compliance; and b. The period of non-compliance, including dates and times; or, if not corrected, the anticipated time the non-compliance is expected to continue, and steps being taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the non-compliance. The permittee shall be responsible for any and all damages that may result and may be subject to enforcement action by the Department for penalties or revocation of this permit. 9. In accepting this permit, the permittee understands and agrees that all records, notes, monitoring data and other information relating to the construction or operation of this permitted source, which are submitted to the Department, may be used by the Department as evidence in any enforcement case involving the permitted source arising under the Florida Statiites isr Department rules, except where such use is prescribed by Sections 403.111 and 403.73, F.S. Such evidence shall only be used to the extent it is consistent with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and appropriate evidentiary rules. 10. The permittee agrees to comply with changes in Department rules and Florida Statutes after a reasonable time for compliance, provided however, the permittee does not waive any other rights granted by Florida Statutes or Department rules. A reasonable time for compliance with a new or amended surface water quality standard, other than those standards addressed in Rule 62-302.500, shall include a reasonable time to obtain or be denied a mixing zone for the new or amended standard. 11. This permit is transferable only upon Department approval in accordance with F.A.C. Rules 62-4.120 and 62-730.300, F.A.C. as applicable. The permittee shall be liable for any non-compliance of the permitted activity until the Department approves the transfer. 12. This permit or a copy thereof shall be kept at the work site of the permitted activity. 13. This permit also constitutes: a. Determination of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) b. Determination of Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) c. Certification of compliance with State Water Quality Standards (Section 401, PL 92-500) d. Compliance with New Source Performance Standards 14. The permittee shall comply with the following: a. Upon request, the permittee shall fiimish all records and plans required under Department rules. During enforcement actions, the retention period for all records will be extended automatically, unless otherwise stipulated by the Department. b. The permittee shall hold at the facility or other location designated by this permit records of all monitoring information (including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation), required by the permit, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit. These materials shall be retained at Page 3 of 5 PERMITTEE: ^ I.D. No: 51101^ ^^^ Mr. Tarek Fahmy, P.E., C.^. Permit/Cert. NoT0164778^-WC Director of Operations Permit Date Issue: April 1, 2010 Florida Governmental Utility Authority Expiration Date: March 31, 2015 GENERAL CONDITIONS: least three years from the date of the sample, measurement, report or application unless otherwise specified by Department rule. c. Recordsof monitoring information shall include: (1) the date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements; (2) the person responsible for performing the sampling or measurements; (3) the dates analyses were performed; - (4) the person responsible for performing the analyses; (5) the analytical techniques or methods used; (6) the results of such analyses. 15. When requested by the Department, the permittee shall within a reasonable time furnish any information required by law that is needed to determine compliance with the permit. If the permittee becomes aware the relevant facts were not submitted or were incorrect in the permit application or in any report to the Department, such facts or information shall be corrected promptly. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: 1. Drawings, plans, documents or specifications submitted by the Permittee, not attached hereto, but retained on file at the South Florida District Office, are made a part hereof. 2. The applicant shall retain the engineer of record or obtain the services of any professional engineer registered in the State of Florida for the inspection of the construction of this project. Upon completion the engineer shall inspect for conformity to construction permit applications and associated documents. 3. A Request for Letter of Release to Place Water Supply System Into Service, form 62-555.900(9), along with record drawings and bacteriological analysis results shall be submitted within 60 days after completion of construction of the project and Department approval obtained prior to placement in operation. 4. Pipe, fittings, valves, fire hydrants and other materials shall confonh to the most recent standards issued by the American Water Works Association (AWWA). 5. Water supply facilities including mains shall be installed, cleaned, disinfected and bacteriologically cleared for service, in accordance with the latest applicable AWWA Standards and Department rules and regulations. Page 4 of 5 PERMITTEE: Mr. Tarek Fahmy, P.E. Director of Operations Florida Governmental Utility Authority SPECIFIC CONDITIONS; I.D.No:5110]^ O^ ^ Permit/Cert. N™0164778=0tjf-WC Permit Date Issue: April 1,2010 Expiration Date: March 31, 2015 6. The facility is a category I and II, requiring a Class C or higher operator: 16 hours per day for 7 days per week. F.A.C. Rule 62-699.310(2)(e)l and 2. The lead/chief operator must be Class B, or higher. An operator meeting the lead/chief operator classification level of the plant shall be available during all periods of plant operation. "Available" means able to be contacted as needed to initiate the appropriate action in a timely manner. Reference Rule 62-699.311(1), F.A.C. 7. The permittee shall submit a monthly operations report (MOR) DEP Form 62-555.900(3), to the Department no later than the tenth of each succeeding month. 8. The water treatment plant shall maintain throughout the distribution system a minimum combined chlorine residual of 0.6 mg/1 or its equivalent. A minimum system pressure of 20 psi must be maintained throughout the system. Also, safety equipment shall be provided and located outside of chlorine room. 9. This facility is a Community Water System as defined in F.A.C. Rule 62-550.200(12) and shall comply with the applicable chemical and bacteriological monitoring requirements of F.A.C. Rule 62-550. Such requirements shall be initiated within 30 days of issue of the letter of release and placement of the water treatment facility in service and the results submitted to the Department. 10. The permittee or suppliers of water shall telephone the State Warning Point (SWP), at 1 -800-320- 0519 immediately (i.e., within two hours) after discovery of any actual or suspected sabotage or security breach, or any suspicious incident, involving a public water system in accordance with the F.A.C. Rule 62-555.350(10). 11. The permittee is reminded of the necessity to comply with the pertinent regulations of any other regulatory agency, as well as any county, municipal, and federal regulations applicable to the project. These regulations may include, but are not limited to, those of the Federal Emergency Management Agency in implementing flood control measures. This permit should not be construed to imply compliance with the rules and regulations of other regulatory agencies. Note: In the event of an emergency the permittee shall contact the Department by calling (800) 320-0519. During normal business hours, the permittee shall call (239) 332-6975. Issued this / 'day of April 2010. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Jon M. Iglehart Director of District Management JMI/BTS Page 5 of 5 '4 Collins, Irene From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: CoHins, Irene Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:15 AM 'M. Fahmy Tarek (tfahmy@govmserv.com)' 'McMahen Brad (BSMcMahen@pbsi.com)'; 'Richards Scott (MSRichards@pbsj.com)' 0164778GoldenGateMinorMod-WC-005-LFP-03-09-10.pdf 0164778GoldenGateMinorMod-WC-005-LFP-03-09-10.pdf; Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) l.jpg MyPE: (PL^AS'E VE^IT'Y'Bm <iyELlVE<liyjmD <^^® <g^CEI<FTOT "BQS <E-MAI^ TO^OV^ ^CO^S. J^ ^cCministrative Assistant PotaSle 'Water (Department of'EnvironmentaC<Proteaion (239) 332-6975 <Ext. 158 Irene. ColSns@dep.state.ftvs Oepatf mei* of i: SaritoninenlBl PreteGUon COVMR FLORIDA, developed by Governor Charlie Crist and the Florida Legislature, gives Floridians access to more affordable health insurance options. To learn more or to sign up for email updates, visit www.CoverFloridaHealthCare.com. <PCease note: Tbridd Has a very BrooifpuBBc records (aw. Most written communications to or from state officials regarding state Business are puBRc records avaiCaSk to tRe puBRc and media upon request, tour e-maiCcommunications may tHerrfore Be suBject to puBEc dxsclbsure (Please consider the environment Before printing tHis emaiL Collins, Irene From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: \ Collins, Irene Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:13 AM 'M. Fahmy Tarek (tfahmy@govmserv.com)' 'McMahen Brad (BSMcMahen@pbsi.com)'; 'Richards Scott (MSRichards@pbsj.com)' 0164778GoldenGateMinorMod-WC-005-LFP-03-09-10.pdf 0164778GoldenGat eMinorMod-WC-0... Administrative Assistant ^otaBk "Water department of ^nvironmentaf (Protection (239) 332-6975'£^.158 Irene, Conins@dep.state.fCus r »^^'^ Dep-ortmcnt of COViR FLOBIDA, developed by Governor Charlie Crist and the Florida Legislature, gives Floridians access to more affordable health insurance options. To learn more or to sign up for email updates, visit www.CoverFloridaHealthCare.com. ^kase note: 'Florida Has a veiy BroadpuBSc records (aw. Most written communications to of from state offtdak regarding state Business arepuBEc records avaiiaBkto tBepuBRc and media upon request 'Your e-maiCcommunications may tderefore Be suBject topuBBc disclosure 'Pkme consider tfk environment Before-printing tkis emaiL Tracking: RecipH^ 'M. Fahmy Tarek (tfahmy@govmserv.com)' 'McMahen Brad (BSMcMahen@pbsi.com)' 'Richards Scott (MSRichards@pbsj.com)' Oni, James Shoemaker, Bennie Delivery Read Delivered: 4/1/2010 10:13 AM Read: 4/1/2010 10:15 AM Delivered: 4/1/2010 10:13 AM From: To: Sent: Subject: Microsoft Exchange Oni, James; Shoemaker, Bennie Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:13 AM Delivered: 0164778GoldenGateMinorMod-WC-005-LFP-03-09-10,pdf Your message has been delivered to the following recipients: Oni, James Shoemaker, Bennie Subject: 0164778GoidenGatelviinorlviod-WC-005-LFP-03-09-10.pdf Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Collins, Irene From: To: Sent: Subject: Microsoft Exchange Richards Scott (MSRichards@pbsJ.com) Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:13 AM Relayed: 0164778GoldenGateMinorMod-WC-005-LFP-03-09-10.pdf Delivery to these recipients or distribution lists is complete, but delivery notification was not sent by the destination: Richards Scott (MSRichards@pbsi.com') Subject: 0164778GoldenGateMinoriMod-WC-0p5-LFP-03-09-10.pdf Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Collins, Irene From: To: Sent: Subject: Microsoft Exchange M. Fahmy Tarek (tfahmy@govmserv.com) Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:13 AM Relayed: 0164778GoldenGateMinorMod-WC-005-LFP-03-09-10.pdf Delivery to these recipients or distribution lists is complete, but delivery notification was not sent by the destination: M. Fahmy Tarek (tfahmy@qovmserv.com') Subject: 0164778GoldenGateMinorMod-WC-005-LFP-03-09-10.pdf Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Cofiins, Irene From: To: Sent: Subject: Microsoft Exchange McMahen Brad (BSMcMahen@pbsj.com) Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:15 AM Relayed: 0164778GoldenGateMinorMod-WC-005-LFP-03--09-10.pdf Delivery to these recipients or distribution lists is complete, but delivery notification was not sent by the destination: |v|cr>1ahen Brad (BSI^ci^ahen(S)pbsj.com) Subject: 0164778GoldenGatel^inorMod-WC-005-LFP-03-09-10.pdf Sent by Microsoft Exctiange Server 2007 Collins, Irene From: Tarek Fahmy [TFahmy@govmserv.com] To: Collins, Irene Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:34 AM Subject: Read: 0164778GoldenGateMinorMod-WC-005-LFP-03-09-10.pdf Your message was read on Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:34:16 AIV! (GI\/1T-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Department of Environmental Protection CERTIFICATION Permit No. 0164778-005-WC Golden Gate WTP - Minor Modification to Comply With 4 - Log Treatment Southwest Coast EMA. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the engineering features described in the above referenced appHcation provide reasonable assurance of compliance with applicable provisions of Chapter 403, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Title 62. However, I have not evaluated and I do not certify aspects of the proposal outside of my area of expertise (including, but not limited to, the electrical, mechanical,,structural, and geological features). Name: Olusegun James Oni, P.E. Certification No.: 49154 Vi> Kl :I Signed) (Date)"" (Seal) APPLICATION FOR A SPECIFIC PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT PWS COMPONENTS I See page 4 for instructions. I. General Project Information A. Name of Project: Golden Gate Water Treatment Plant - Minor modification to comply with 4-log treatment B. Description of Project and Its Purpose: To provide water treatment to meet 4-log virus treatment per the Ground Water Rule, modifications are proposed for the Golden Gate WTP. These include the replacement of the existing chlorine contact tank. The tank will be replaced with pipeline which provides the required volume to meet 4-log treatement at the rated flow for the facility, including a planned future expansion. This will provide 4-log treatment up to 2.599 MGD. Per a recent letter from the FDEP to the FGUA, "Determination of Four-Log Virus Treatment of Ground Water" dated December 23, 2009, 4-log virus treatment was temporarily granted for the facility based on multiple treatment segments. In compliance with the letter, this application provides for 4-log virus treatment within a single segment prior to the Ground Storage Tank. C. Does project create a "new system" as described imder subsection 62-555.525(1), F.A.C? nVes, and a completed copy of Form 62-555.900(20), New Water System Capacity Development Financial and Managerial Operations Plan, is attached. ^No. D. Location of Project 1. County Where Proj ect Located: Collier 2. Description of Project Location: Golden Gate Water Treatment Plant,4300 Golden Gate Pkvyy, Naples, FL 34116 3. Latitude and Longitude of Each New Treatment Plant and Each New Raw Water Source (attach additional sheets if necessary): rmi ■NiJBoe of New TlSatttient Flaafor Rav^Water-Sdurce * ■ -i • %.Lafitu(fe----^'^ rr<-WmAxm:' : »f N/A "N "W "N "W , 1 „;^ "W "N "W "N "W E. Estimate of Cost to Construct Project: $125.000 F. Estimate of Dates for Starting and Completing Construction of Project: April 15,2010 thru June 15,2010 G. Applicant PWS/Company Name: Florida Governmental Utility Authority PWS Identification No.:* 5110117 PWS Type:" Community V~\ Non-Transient Non-Community Q Transient Non-Community [71 Consecutive Contact Person: Tarek M. Fahmy Contact Person's Title: Du'ector of Operations Contact Person's Mailing Address: 280 Wekiva Springs Rd, Suite 2000 City: Longwood State: FL Zip Code: 32779 Contact Person's Telephone Number: 407-629-6900 Contact Person's Fax Number: 407-629-6963 Contact Person's E-Mail Address: TFahmy@govmserv.com This information is required on(y if the applicant is a public water system (PWS). H. PubUc Water System (PWS) Supplying Water to Project PWS Name: Golden Gate PWS Identification No.: 5110117 PWS Type: I Community D Non-Transient Non-Communitv l~| Transient Non-Commimity f"! Consecutive PWS Owner: Florida Governmental Utility Authority Contact Person: Tarek M. Fahmy Contact Person's Title: Director of Operations Contact Person's Mailing Address: 280 Wekiva Springs Rd, Suite 2000 City: Longwood State: FL Zip Code: 32779 Contact Person's Telephone Number: 407-629-6900 Contact Person's Fax Number: 407-629-6963 HEiSEHWfcll Contact Person's E-Mail Address: TFahmy@govmserv.com DEP Form 62-555.900(1) Effective August 28, 2003 Page 1 HAR e 2 21 ni^i ilR APPLICATION FORTTSPECIFIC PERMIT TO CONSTR l^ PWS COMPONENTS Project Name: Golden Gate Water Treatment Plant - Minor Applicant: Florida Governmental Utility Authority I. Public Water System (PWS) that Will Own Project After It Is Placed into Permanent Operation PWS Name: Golden Gate PWS Identification No.:* 5110117 PWS Type:" I Community CD Non-Transient Non-Community □ Transient Non-Community □ Consecutive PWS Ovmer: Florida Governmental Utility Authority Contact Person: Tarek M. Fahmy Contact Person's Mailmg Address: 280 Wekiva Springs Rd, Suite 2000 Contact Person's Title: Director of Operations City: Longwood State: FL Zip Code: 32779 Contact Person's Telephone Number: 407-629-6900 Contact Person's Fax Number: 407-629-6963 Contact Person's E-Mail Address: TFahmy(fl),govmserv.com This information is required only if the owner/operator is an existing PWS. J. Professional Engineer(s) or Other Person(s) in Responsible Charge of Designing Project* Company Name: PBS&J Designer(s): Brad Mcmahen, P.E. Scott Richards, E.I. Title(s) of Designer(s): Engineer License Number(s): FL62966 Qualifications of Designer(s): IXI Professional Engineer(s) Licensed in Florida - □ Public Officer(s) Employed by State, County, Municipal, or Other Governmental Unit of State^ D Plumbing Contractor(s) Licensed in Florida - License Number(s):'^ Mailing Address of Designer(s): 482 S. Keller Rd 5u)t4 <U~ City: Orlando ^fP^ State: FL Zip Code: 32810 Telephone Number of Designer(s): 407-647-7275 J/ Fax Number of Designer(s): 407-647-0624 E-Mail Address(es) of Designer(s): BSMcMahen@pbsj.com, MSRichards@pbsj.com * Except as noted in paragraphs 62-555.520(3)(a) and (b), F.A. C, projects shali be designed under the responsible charge of one or more professionai engineers iicensed in Florida. ^ Attach a detailed construction cost estimate showing that the cost to construct this project is $10,000 or less. ^ Attach documentation showing that this project will be installed by the plumbing contractor(s) designing this project, documentation showing that this project involves a public water system serving a single property and fewer than 250 fixture units, and a detailed construction cost estimate showing that the cost to construct this project is $50,000 or less. II. Certifications A. Certification by Applicant I am duly authorized to sign this application on behalf of the applicant identified in Part I.G of this application. I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this project complies with Chapter 62-555, F.A.C, and provides assurance of compUance with Chaptep^^^O, F.AJ2: pslso^itifyjiiit construction of this project has not begun yet. ^gffature and Date B. Certification by PWS Supplying Water to Project ^y^/2<,li Tarek M. Fahmy Director of Operations Prmted or Typed Name Titie I am duly authorized to sign this application on behalf of the PWS identified in Part I.H of this application. I certify that said PWS will supply the water necessary to meet the design water demands for this project. I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, said PWS's connection to this project will not cause said PWS to be, or contribute to said PWS being, in noncompliance with Chapter 62-550 or 62-555, F.A.C. I also certify that said PWS has reviewed the preliminary design report or drawings, specifications, and design data for this project and that said PWS considers the connection(s) between this project and said PWS acceptable as designed. • Name(s) of Water Treatment Plant(s) to Which this Project Will Be Connected: Golden Gate Water Treatment Plant Total Permitted Maximum Day Operating Capacify of Plant(s), gpd: 2.099,000 • Tot^J-^aximum Day Flow at Plant(s) as Recorded on Monthly Operating Reports During Past 12 Months, gpd: 1.727.000 Director of Operations :2-?^'^2^/o Tarek M. Fahmy Printed or Typed Name Titie DEP Form 62-555.900(1) Effective August 28, 2003 Page 2 mRi2 20i APPLICATION FORWSPECIFIC PERMIT TO CONSTRl iWr PWS COMPONENTS I Project Name: Golden Gate Water Treatment Plant - Minor I Applicant: Florida Governmental Utility Authority C. Certification by PWS that Will Own Project After It Is Placed into Permanent Operation I am duly authorized to sign this application on behalf of the PWS identified in Part I.I of this application. I certify that said PWS will own tiji? project after it is placed intp permanent operation. I also certify that said PWS has reviewed the prelimmary design report<jfdrawings,^€qfi^ti^igr ^id^esign data for this project and that said PWS considers this project acceptable as designed. ''C^g^'^^/o Tarek M. Fahmy Director of Operations signature and Date j/"^ Printed or Typed Name D. Certification by Professional Engineer(s) in Responsible Charge of Designing Project* Title I, the undersigned professional engineer licensed in Florida, am in responsible charge of preparing the preliminary design report or drawings, specifications, and design data for this project. I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the design of this project complies with Chapter 62-555, F.A.C, and provides assurance of compliance with Chapter 62-550, F.A.C. Signature, Seal, and Date: Signature, Seal, and Date: ■2/!?{0 Printed/Typed Name Bradley S. Mcmahen, P.E. License Number 62966 Portion of Engineering Document(s) for Which Responsible: All facihfy modifications associated with 4-log treatment Printed/Typed Name: License Number: Portion of Engineering Document(s) for Which Responsible: Signature, Seal, and Date: Printed/Typed Name: License Number: Portion of Engineering Document(s) for Which Responsible: Signature, Seal, and Date: Prmted/Typed Name: License Number: Portion of Engmeering Document(s) for Which Responsible: * Except as noted in paragraphs 62-555.520(3)(a) and (b), F.A.C, projects shall be designed under the responsible charge of one or more professional engineers (PEs) licensed in Florida. If this project is being designed under the responsible charge of one or more PEs licensed in Florida, Part II.D of this application shall be completed by the PE(s) in responsible charge. If this project is not being designed under the responsible charge of one or more PEs licensed in Florida, Part II.D does not have to be completed. MR 02 2010 DEP Form 62-555.900(1) Effective August 28, 2003 Page 3 IW" APPLICATION FORTTSPECIFIC PERMIT TO CONSTRUE PWS COMPONENTS INSTRUCTIONS: This application shall be completed and submitted by persons proposing to construct or aher public water system components imless such proposed construction or alteration is permitted under the Department of Environmental Protection's (DEP's) "General Permit for Construction of Water Main Extensions for Public Water Systems," in which case Form 62-555.900(7) is to be completed and submitted, or under the DEP's "General Permit for Construction of Lead or Copper Corrosion Control, or Iron or Manganese Sequestration, Treatment Facilities for Small or Medium Public Water Systems," in which case Form 62-555.900(18) is to be completed and submitted. Complete and submit one copy of this application to the appropriate DEP District Office or Approved Coimty Health Department (ACHD) along with payment of the proper application processing fee and one copy of the following information: • either a preliminary design report or drawings, specifications, and design data (the preliminary design report or drawings, specifications, and design data shall contain all pertinent information required imder subsection 62-555.520(4), F.A.C); and • the Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC) certificate of authorization to provide water service if the project mvolves construction of a new public water system subject to the jurisdiction of the FPSC. All information provided on this application shall be typed or printed in ink. Application processing fees are listed in paragraph 62- 4.050(4)(n), F.A.C. Checks for application processing fees shall be made payable to the Department of Environmental Protection or to the appropriate ACHD. Preliminary design reports, drawings, specifications, and design data prepared under the responsible charge of one or more professional engmeers licensed in Florida shall be signed, sealed, and dated by the professional engineer(s) in responsible charge. NOTE THAT A SEPARATE APPLICATION AND A SEPARATE APPLICATION PROCESSING FEE ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH NON-CONTIGUOUS PROJECT.* * Non-contiguous projects are projects that are neither interconnected nor located nearby one another (i.e., on the same site, on adjacent streets, or in the same neighborhood). MAR 0 2 201 DEP Form 62-555.900(1) Page 4 _, Effective August 28, 2003 0,E.HSOI wS- ''-ii DEPARTM»T OF ENVIRONMENTAL PB^TECTION [WT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PW WATER FACILITIES - PERMIT DATA ENTRY FORM Program Area:/ FW/ DW IW UIC THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND RETURNED TO THE DATA PROCESSING TEAM WITHIN THREE BUSINESS DAYS FROM THE CHECK DATA RECEIVED LISTED BELOW, SUSPENSE 3 I S' /fO LOG^ 0^3 i PROCESSOR'S NAME ^^^T!S CASH RECEIVING INFORMATION: Chei# 0^^ 3gg;j7 Amount (JC6.''^ Date Rec'd ^^^ '^0 Check # \ Amount , . . Date Rec'd CODING INFORMATION: FEE INFORMATION: Correct Fee $ /OOG." Fee Received % / (QOO ^ To Be Refunded $ Typeji Subt)^pe County OVERRIDE INFORMATION.: Override? Y orN — Reason: SysReceipt# & V'/Cl^/^.^ SysPayment# 9^?0SY^ SvsAiplication/PA# 0 /(oM 11K - OO^ . UAZ. j/Yl I CRA# S^fdA/ 1 " '' WAFR Input: Facilitv# !l 1! PROJECT: G=»<Ol-b^Aj ^oriTE Generic PA Input: Site # 1 " '' WAFR Input: Facilitv# !l 1! PROJECT: G=»<Ol-b^Aj ^oriTE lA}-rP- /n./v'o^^ K©1^. 1 I FACILITY: Sct^VX^a 1 t 1 . , ■ ' SUSPENSE (3 DAYS) Receipt Date (Initial & Date) Completion Date (Initial & Date) Mailrd'om Processor (Stamping & Sorting) fy^Qfi.^lQ-lib Administrative,Assistant i (Mail Pick Up) Adm. i^SSistant (Fee Verification, Coding, & Assign Program) ^S\s^io Permit Supervisor (PW) Permit Processor (Data Entry) SeniorjClerk (Project Creation & Money Linking) COMMENTS: FormsaNPDEntry 12-28-06 isc ^l^teiifiSiigl^l^^^^l^te'iifeSi^si'^ P^SP SITE Permit tite ame \t;"l "I m''All WAIN: I!'i-."i;.il Hi I'lAtil I VI'AIIMHN iiti;i//i: :jrti-r riiiiiK C :mrner:= I" = ='A; " FJjKTViT^RjqjeCt'J "■Vif^.Tr: Per:-iil ? =prmit -■tTii.e.lSDIDISTRICT) rJ'-^:'^.|^6tf-'fe::J'V!j|§gEeh^elJ"3^ X>-iGRA'# " Jl'^^ Agency^Action IP"!''!!!^^, GOLDEN GATE WTP 0|e:!\3me;V Dest:':|''9™23 aiNORM0D>5=.1iMGD I ;n-ri F-'n?aqi.o •_■; ■; , Issued l/iu:Jl!.L:,J^v'^^'i>$'i^s3;X:r^ ^;_ ,^ ■ ■ Fee L/l^-OogFeeRecd I. ^^ I^' "|frDel;|f T ■ ^Jj^^lll^ JlWyVACS/MEIDj ^elfcatign'ftctibri"; :|M0DIFI(^TI0N OGC D'- •■ IVie lAPPLICANT . , -RelatediParty'T,.; r-rr.. Narne ;' AHIHy, TAREK M ' -": - •, -; CompahV. jr-LORiDft GOVERHMEHTAL UTILITY.AUTHORITY .Irj-iP^t; .■'!lll WEKIVA SPRINGS RDrPROTEGRIJY.RLAZA,,SUITE 2000 ; (- If 'l UNGWO'OD ^"^^^ a' ~/T~~ ■„tii rrW^:€JS\ Ili7i629^900 ''Fax 407.629-6963 ^,;.St|;e^feiJb;|!|iJ||g 32779 CouiitPy;;.l"-S-A-- '■If ISHOEMAKER B ■c.PTOcessors.r, '.-"iraail =' *f3hmy@govs6rt/.com «' «Sjlnactive"L Florida Governmei^|Utility Authority ^ ^ 280 Wekiva SpringWoad, Suite 2000 Vendojj^^ Check Date Check Number 90"^ 02/26/2010 00035314 es-es/esi Longwood, FL 32779-6026 (407) 629-6900 $ 1,000.00 VOID AFTER 180 DAYS Pay One Thousand Dollars and 00 cents **«■«*«-**«:****- To The FL DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Order Of pQ BOX 2549 FT. MYERS, FL 33902-2549 Capital Cilv Bank Tatlahassee, FL -WIP Authonznd Signature Florida Governmental Utility Authority T^Hn^^^^mp^^^^??^^^MJ^ "wn:-' GG WTP 4 LOG PRJ GG063 PERMIT 02/22/2010 22210 v;'An]i®.&Ot' j£ieSc#Ste^f «;.*;:'•:,■.■•-Total; ^ ' ■ 1,000.00 VendprijEsIb-,'':?^^ 9078 ■SZ'ii- l<iSW. ■-■ w>'■; FL DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 00035314 02/26/2010 1,000.00 March 03, 2010 Florida Governmental Utility Authority 280 Wekiva Springs Road, Suite 2000 Longwood Fl 32779-6026 Dear Sir or Madam: RE: Receipt Number 696805 Your remittance, check number 00035314 in the amount of $ 1,000.00, was received by the Department of Environmental Protection on March 02, 2010. Any future inquiries regarding this payment should reference the above receipt number. Sincerely, Yvonne Figueroa, Administration Department of Environmental Protection yf PERMIT ROUTING SHEET PLEASE INITIAL Date //^v^, ^^fa (^^//0>J^ Co. /V5 By .^FORCEMENT ' ( ) No problems. ; { ) Under Eriforcement - return to Permitting. .^JSlJERICAL ( /-^ Type cover letter, permit and "conditions of permit." Type following envelopes: ( ) Tallahassee . ( ^ Applicant ( --t^ Engineer ■ ) Local Program ( ( ) ( ) ( ) { . ) (, ) Make new file folder for this project. ( ) . , - i__ CO'. Health Dept. Co. Commission Fla. Public Service Comra. Other ^STRICT MANAGER Check, sign permit and cover letter, return to permitting. ^JlERJ'IITTING . (.^.-) A OK ( ) If any problems, S Xerox copies of cover letter, permit, permit LERICAL ( A^ Make conditions., and ( -^ make 3' .Xerox copies of Sampling schedule for each package below. ( ^ Group .package'for ^^p'lierantr-oJ-'iginal cover' letter, •.. . permit, .permit conditions -and one copy .of application. ( ^ Group package for Engineer; 1 copy:of cover letter, permit, permit conditions and application. ( ) Group package for Local Program; 1 copy of cover letter, permit, permit conditions and application. ( ^T^ Group office copies of permit, cover letter, permit conditions, application, plans and specifications. Group packages of 1 copy of cover letter, permit and permit conditions for: ( ) County Health Dept- ( ) County Commission ( ) Fla. Public Service Commission ( ) : { ) ( ) ~" ^igl^ERICAL - Mail each package to respective party.r- ( ) (Tallahassee) ( ( «-f Applicant ( ;( ^ Engineer ( ( ) Local Program. ( Sy^ OFFICE PACKAGE ) County Health Dept. ( ) County Commission ■ ( ) • Fla. Public Service Commission ( <■)—Other SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATER USE PERMIT NO. RE-ISSUE 11-00148-W NON-ASSIGNABLE PORlC .0229 Iil.v. 01/09 Date Issued: March 1, 2010 Expiration Date: March 10, 2030 Authorizing: THE CONTINUATION OF AN EXISTING USE OF GROUND WATER FROM THE LOWER TAMIAMI AQUIFER AND WATER TABLE AQUIFER FOR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY USE WITH AN ANNUAL ALLOCATION OF 908,9 MILLION GALLONS, Located In: Collier County, S15-17, 20-22, 27-29!T49S/R26E Issued To: FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY (GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY) 280 WEKIVA SPRINGS RD #2000, LONGWOOD, FL 32779-6026 This is to notify you of the District's agency action concerning Permit Application No, 080902-11, dated September 2, 2008, This action is taken pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 373, Part II, Florida Statutes (F,S,), Rule 40E-1 ,603 and Chapter 40E-2, Florida Administrative Code (FA C.), Based on the information provided, District rules have been adhered to and a Water Use Permit is in effect for this project sUbject to: 1, Not receiving a filed request for an administrative hearing pursuant to Section 120,5 and Section 120,569, or request a judicial review pursuant Section 120.68, Florida Statutes. 2. The attached 28 Limiting Conditions. 3. The attached 18 exhibits. Permittee agrees to hold and save the South Florida Water Management District and its successors harmless from any and all damages, claims or liabilities which may arise by reason of the construction, maintenance or use of activities authorized by this permit. Said application, including all plan and specifications attached thereto, is by reference made a part hereof.Upon written notice to permittee, this permit may be temporarily modified, or restricted under a Declaration of Water Shortage or a Declaration of Emergency due to Water Shortage in accordance with provisions of Chapter 373, Fla. Statutes, and applicable rules and regulations of the South Florida Water Management District. This Permit may be permanently or temporarily revoked, in whole or in part, for the violation of the conditions of the permit or for the violation of any provision of the Water Resourres Act and regulations thereunder This Permit does not convey to the permittee any property rights nor any privileges other than those specified herein, nor relieve the permittee from complying with any law, regulation, or requirement affecting the rights of other bodies or agencies. Should you object to these conditions, please refer to the attached "Notice of Rights" which addresses the procedures to be followed if you desire a public hearing or other review of the proposed agency action. Should you wish to object to the proposed agency action or file a petition or request, please provide written objections, petitions, requests and/or waivers to: Elizabeth Veguilla, Deputy Clerk, MSC2440 South Florida Water Management District Post Office Box 24680 West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 Please contact this office if you have any questions concerning this matter. If we do not hear from you in accordance with the "Notice of Rights", we will assume that you concur with the District's action. CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the Staff Report, Conditions and Notice of Rights have been mailed to the Permittee (and the persons listed on the attached staff report distribution list) no later than 5:00 p,m. on this 2nd day of March, 2010, in accordance with Section 120.60(3), Florida Statutes, and a copy has been filed and acknowledged with the Deputy District Clerk. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY By ELIZABETH VEGUILLA DEPUTY CLERK SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Attachments CERTIFIED MAIL# 70050390000598195137 PAGE 1 OF 5 PERMIT NO: 11-00148-W PAGE 2 OF 5 LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. This permit shall expire on March 10, 2030. 2. Application for a permit modification may be made at any time. 3. Water use classification: Public water supply 4. Source classification is: .; Ground Water from: .l Lower Tamiami Aquifer Water Table Aquifer 5. Annual allocation shall not exceed 909 MG. Maximum monthly allocation shall not exceed 81 MG. The following limitations to annual withdrawals from specific sources are stipulated: Water Table Aquifer-: 752 MG. Lower Tamiami Aquifer-: 495 MG. The following limitations to maximum monthly withdrawals from specific sources are stipulated: Water Table Aquifer-: 62.64 MG. Lower Tamiami Aquifer-: 41.25 MG. The maximum monthly withdrawal from wells GG-3 and GG-4 shall not exceed 6.5 MG for each well. 6. Pursuant to Rule 40E-1.61 05, F.A.C., Notification of Transfer of Interest in Real Property, within 30 days of any transfer of interest or control of the real property at which any permitted facility, system, consumptive use, or activity is located, the permittee must notify the District, in writing, of the transfer giving the name and address of the new owner or person in control and providing a copy of the instrument effectuating the transfer, as set forth in Rule 40E-1.6107, FAC. Pursuant to Rule 40E-1.61 07 (4), until transfer is approved by the District, the permittee shall be liable for compliance with the permit. The permittee transferring the permit shall remain liable for all actions that are required as well as all violations of the permit which occurred prior to the transfer of the permit. Failure to comply with this or any other condition of this permit constitutes a violation and pursuant to Rule 40E-1.609, Suspension, Revocation and Modification of Permits, the District may suspend or revoke the permit. This Permit is issued to: FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY 280 WEKIVA SPRINGS RD #2000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779-6026 7. Withdrawal Facilities: Ground Water -Existing: PERMIT NO: 11-00148-W PAGE 3 OF 5 1 -8" X 22' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 15 Feet 1 -8" X 22' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 11.6 Feet 1 -6" X 22' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 15 Feet 2 -8" X 22' X 250 GPM Wells Cased To 15 Feet 1 -6" X 45' X 160 GPM Well Cased To 35 Feet 1 -8" X 45' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 35 Feet 1 -14" X 33' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 8.5 Feet 1 -8" X 25' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 15 Feet Ground Water -Proposed: 2 -10" X 180' X 810 GPM Wells Cased To 80 Feet .! 1 -10" X 200' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 141 Feet 8. Permittee shall mitigate interference with existing legal uses that was caused in whole or in part by the permittee's withdrawals, consistent with the approved mitigation plan. As necessary to offset the interference, mitigation will include pumpage reduction, replacement of the impacted individual's equipment, relocation of wells, change in withdrawal source, or other means. Interference to an existing legal use is defined as an impact that occurs under hydrologic conditions equal to or less severe than a 1 in 10 year drought event that results in the: (1) Inability to withdraw water consistent with provisions of the permit, such as when remedial structural or operational actions not materially authorized by existing permits must be taken to address the interference; or (2) Change in the quality of water pursuant to primary State Drinking Water Standards to the extent that the water can no longer be used for its authorized purpose, or such change is imminent. 9. Permittee shall mitigate harm to existing off-site land uses caused by the permittee's withdrawals, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance. When harm occurs, or is imminent, the District will require the permittee to modify withdrawal rates or mitigate the harm. Harm as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance, includes: (1) Significant reduction in water levels on the property to the extent that the designed function of the water body and related surface water management improvements are damaged, not including aesthetic values. The designed function of a water body is identified in the original permit or other governmental authorization issued for the construction of the water body. In cases where a permit was not required, the designed function shall be determined based on the purpose for the original construction of the water body (e.g. fill for construction, mining, drainage canal, etc.) (2) Damage to agriculture, including damage resulting from reduction in soil moisture resulting from consumptive use; or (3) Land collapse or subsidence caused by reduction in water levels associated with consumptive use. 10. Permittee shall mitigate harm to the natural resources caused by the permittee's withdrawals, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance. When harm occurs, or is imminent, the District will require the permittee to modify withdrawal rates or mitigate the harm. Harm, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance includes: (1) Reduction in ground or surface water levels that results in harmful lateral movement of the fresh water/salt water interface, (2) Reduction in water levels that harm the hydroperiod of wetlands, · I PERMIT NO: 11-00148-W PAGE 4 OF 5 (3) Significant reduction in water levels or hydroperiod in a naturally occurring water body such as a lake or pond, (4) Harmful movement of contaminants in violation of state water quality standards, or (5) Harm to the natural system including damage to habitat for rare or endangered species. 11. If any condition of the permit is violated, the permit shall be subject to review and possible modification, enforcement action, or revocation. 12. Authorized representatives of the District shall be permitted to enter, inspect, and observe the permitted system to determine compliance with special conditions. 13. The Permittee is advised that this permit does not relieve any person from the requirement to obtain all necessary federal, state, local and special district authorizations. 14. The permit does not convey any property right to the Permittee, nor any rights and privileges other than those specified in the Permit and Chapter 40E-2, Florida Administrative Code. 15. Permittee shall submit all data as required by the implementation schedule for each of the limiting conditions to: S.F'w.M.D., Supervising Hydrogeologist -Post-Permit Compliance, Water Use Regulation Dept. (4320), P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680. 16. In the event of a declared water shortage, water withdrawal reductions will be ordered by the District in accordance with the Water Shortage Plan, Chapter 40E-21, FAC. The Permittee is advised that during a water shortage, pumpage reports shall be submitted as required by Chapter 40E-21, FAC. 17. Prior to the use of any proposed water withdrawal facility authorized under this permit, unless otherwise specified, the Permittee shall equip each facility with a District-approved operating water use accounting system and submit a report of calibration to the District, pursuant to Section 4.1, Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications. In addition, the Permittee shall submit a report of recalibration for the water use accounting system for each water withdrawal facility (existing and proposed) authorized under this permit every five years from each previous calibration, continuing at five-year increments. 18. Monthly withdrawals for each withdrawal facility shall be submitted to the District quarterly. The water accounting method and means of calibration shall be stated on each report. 19. The Permittee shall notify the District within 30 days of any change in service area boundary. If the Permittee will not serve a new demand within the service area for which the annual allocation was calculated, the annual allocation may then be subject to modification and reduction. 20. Permittee shall determine unaccounted-for distribution system losses. Losses shall be determined for the entire distribution system on a monthly basis. Permittee shall define the manner in which unaccounted-for losses are calculated. Data collection shall begin within six months of Permit issuance. Loss reporting shall be submitted to the District on a yearly basis from the date of Permit issuance. 21. Permittee shall maintain an accurate flow meter at the intake of the water treatment plant for the purpose of measuring daily inflow of water. 22. Prior to any application to renew or modify this permit, the Permittee shall evaluate long term water supply alternatives and submit a long term water supply plan to the District. Within one year of permit issuance, the Permittee shall submit to the District an outline of the proposed plan. The assessment should include consideration of saline intrusion, wellfield protection, plans for compliance with applicable wellfield protection ordinances, expected frequencies and plans to cope with water shortages or well field failures, and conservation measures to reduce overall stresses on the aquifer. 23. The Water Conservation Plan required by Section 2.6.1 of the Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications within .1 PERMIT NO: 11-00148-W PAGE 5 OF 5 the South Florida Water Management District, must be implemented in accordance with the approved implementation schedule. 24. If a proposed well location is different from a location specified in the application, the Permittee shall submit to the District an evaluation of the impact of pumpage from the proposed well location on adjacent existing legal uses, pollution sources, environmental features, the saline water interface, and water bodies one month prior to all new well construction. The Permittee is advised that the proposal must be in compliance with all permitting criteria and performance standards in effect at the time of submittal, and that a formal modification of the permit shall be required if the withdrawals from the well location will result in an environmental or resource impact significantly greater than that anticipated in the permit review process. 25. If at any time there is an indication that the well casing, valves, or controls leak or have become inoperative, repairs or replacement shall be made to restore the system to an operating condition. Failure to make such repairs shall be cause for filling and abandoning the well, in accordance with procedures outlined in Chapters 40E-3 and 40E-30, Florida . ' .,. Administrative Code . 26. The Permittee shall submit to the District an updated Well Description Table (Table A) within one month of completion of the proposed wells identifying the actual total and cased depths, pump manufacturer and model numbers, pump types, intake depths and type of meters. 27. The Permittee shall continue to submit monitoring data in accordance with the approved saline water intrusion monitoring program for this project. This plan requires monthly data collection and quarterly data submission of: 1) Water levels measured at Monitor Wells A through G (measured immediately prior to any sampling). 2) Water quality analyses for conductivity and chloride concentration of water from Monitor Wells A through G; the wells will be purged by pumping prior to obtaining a water sample. 3) Water quality analyses for conductivity and chloride concentration of water from the Lower Tamiami Aquifer production wells; the wells will be purged by pumping (using the permanent well pump) prior to obtaining a water sample. 28. Every five years from the date of permit issuance, the permittee shall submit a water use compliance report for review and approval by District Staff, which addresses the following: 1. The results of a water conservation audit that documents the efficiency of water use on the project site using data produced from an onsite evaluation conducted. In the event that the audit indicates additional water conservation is appropriate or the per capita use rate authorized in the permit is exceeded, the permittee shall propose and implement specific actions to reduce the water use to acceptable levels within timeframes proposed by the permittee and approved by the District. 2. A comparison of the permitted allocation and the allocation that would apply to the project based on current District allocation rules and updated population and per capita use rates. In the event the permit allocation is greater than the allocation provided for under District rUle, the permittee shall apply for a letter modification to reduce the allocation consistent with District rules and the updated population and per capita use rates to the extent they are considered by the District to be indicative of long term trends in the population and per capita use rates over the permit duration. In the event that the permit allocation is less than allowable under District rule, the permittee shall apply for a modification of the permit to increase the allocation if the permittee intends to utilize an additional allocation, or modify its operation to comply with the existing conditions of the permit. NOTICE OF RIGHTS As required by Sections 120.569(1), and 120.60(3), Fla, Stat., following is notice of the opportunities which may be available for administrative hearing or jUdicial review when the substantial interests of a party are determined by an agency. Please note that this Notice of Rights is not intended to provide legal advice. Not all the legal proceedings detailed below may be an applicable or appropriate remedy. You may wish to consult an attomey regarding your legal rights. RIGHT TO REQUEST ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING A person whose substantial interests are or may be affected by the South Florida Water Management District's (SFWMD or District) action has the right to request an administrative hearing on that action pursuant to Sections 120,569 and 120.57, Fla. Stat. Persons seeking a hearing on a District decision which does or may determine their substantial interests shall file a petition for hearing with the District Clerk within 21 days of receipt of written notice of the decision, unless one of the following shorter time periods [ apply: 1) within 14 days of the notice of consolidated intent to grant or deny concurrently reviewed applications for environmental resource permits and use of sovereign submerged lands pursuant to Section 373.427, Fla. Stat.; or 2) within 14 days of service of an Administrative Order pursuant to Subsection 373.119(1), Fla. Stat. "Receipt of written notice of agency decision" means receipt of either written notice through mail, or electronic mail, or posting that the District has or intends to take final agency action, or publication of nolice that the District has or intends to take final agency action, Any person who receives written notice of a SFWMD decision and fails to file a written request for hearing within the timeframe described above waives the right to request a hearing on that decision. Filing Instructions The Petition must be filed with the Office of the Drstrict Clerk of the SFWMD. Filings with the District Clerk may be made by mail, hand-delivery or facsimile. Filings bye-mail will not be accepted. Any person wishing to receive a clerked copy with the date and lime stamped must provide an additional copy. A petition for administrative hearing is deemed filed upon receipt during normal business hours by the District Clerk at SFWMD headquarters in West Palm Beach, Florida, Any document received by the office of the SFWMD Clerk after 5:00 p.m. shall be filed as of 8:00 a.m. on the next regUlar business day. Additional filing instructions are as follows: • Filings by mail must be addressed to the Office of the SFWMD Clerk, P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, Florida 33416. • Filings by hand-delivery must be delivered to the Office of the SFWMD Clerk. Delivery of a petition to the SFWMD's security desk does not constitute filing. To ensure proper filing, it will be necessary to request the SFWMD's security officer to contact the Clerk's office. An employee of the SFWMD's Clerk's office will receive and file the petition. • Filings by facsimile must be transmitted to the SFWMD Clerk's Office at (561) 682-6010. Pursuant to Subsections 28-106.104(7), (8) and (9), Fla, Admin. Code, a party who files a document by facsimile represents that the original physically signed document will be retained by that party for the duration of that proceeding and of any subsequent appeal or subsequent proceeding in that cause. Any party who elects to file any document by facsimile shall be responsible for any delay, disruption, or interruption of the electronic signals and accepts the full risk that the document may not be properly filed with the clerk as a result. The filing date for a document filed by facsimile shall be the date the SFWMD Clerk receives the complete document. Rev. 07101/2009 Initiation oran Administrative Hearing Pursuant to Rules 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, Fla. Admin. Code, initiation of an administrative hearing ·1 shall be made by written petition to the SFWMD in legible form and on 8 and 1/2 by 11 inch white paper. All petitions shall contain: . I 1. Identification of the action being contested, including the permit number, application number, District file number or any other SFWMD identification number, if known. 2. The name, address and telephone number of the petitioner and petitioner's representative, if any. 3. An explanation of how the petitioner's substantial interests will be affected by the agency determination. 4. A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the SFWMD's decision. 5. A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the petition must so indicate. 6. A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged. including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the SFWMD's proposed action. 7. A statement of the specific rules or statutes the petitioner contends reqUire reversal or modification of the SFWMD's proposed action. 8. If disputed issues of material fact exist, the statement must also include an explanation of how the alleged facts relate to the specific rules or statutes. 9. A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action the petitioner wishes the SFWMD to take with respect to the SFWMD's proposed action. A person may file a request for an extension of time for filing a petition. The SFWMD may, for good cause, grant the request. Requests for extension of time must be filed with the SFWMD prior to the deadline for filing a petition for hearing. Such requests for extension shall contain a certificate that the moving party has consulted with all other parties conceming the extension and that the SFWMD and any other parties agree to or oppose the extension. A timely request for extension of time shall toU the running of the time period for filing a petition until the request is acted upon. If the District takes action with substantially different impacts on water resources from the notice of intended agency decision, the persons who may be SUbstantially affected shall have an additional point of entry pursuant to Rule 28-106.111, Fla. Admin. Code, unless otherwise provided by law. Mediation The procedures for pursuing mediation are set forth in Section 120.573, Fla. Stat., and Rules 28-106.111 and 28-106.401-.405, Fla. Admin. Code. The SFWMD is not proposing mediation for this agency action under Section 120.573, Fla. Stat., at this time. RIGHT TO SEEK JUDICIAL REVIEW Pursuant to Sections 120.60(3) and 120.68, Fla. Stat., a party who is adversely affected by final SFWMD action may seek judicial review of the SFWMD's final decision by filing a notice of appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110 in the Fourth District Court of Appeal or in the appellate district where a party resides and filing a second copy of the notice with the SFWMD Clerk within 30 days of rendering of the final SFWMD action. Rev. 07/01/2009 2 ," Ti Last Date for Agency Action: March 10,2010 Water Use Staff Review Summary Application Number: Permit Number: 080902-11 11-00148-W FINAL APPROVED BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MARCH 1,2010 Project Name: GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY Water Use Permit Status: MODIFICATION Environmental Resource Permit Status: NOT APPLICABLE. Right Of Way Permit Status: NOT APPLICABLE ." Location: COLLIER COUNTY, S 15-17, 20-22, 27 -29fT49S/R26E Applicant's Name and Address: FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY 280 WEKIVA SPRINGS RD #2000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779-6026 Purpose: The purpose of this application is to renew and modify a Water Use Permit for public water supply for the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) Golden Gate Water Treatment Plant, which serves the city of Golden Gate. Withdrawals are from the Lower Tamiami Aquifer via three proposed withdrawal facilities and from the Water Table Aquifer via eight existing withdrawal facilities. The modification requests an average annual increase of 188.96 million gallons per year (MGY) from 702 MGY to 890.96 MGY and a maximum monthly increase of 7.92 million gallons per month (MGM) from 71.54 MGM to 79.46 MGM, based on the projected population increase over the next 20 years. Page 1/13 080902-11 11-00148-W GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY March 10,2010 ·.i '·' Project Summary Expiration Date: Water Use Classification: Sources: March 10, 2030 Public Water Supply Ground Water from: Lower Tamiami Aquifer Water Table Aquifer Authorized Allocation : Annual Allocation: Maximum Monthly Allocation: 909 Million Gallons (MG) 81 Million Gallons (MG) Specific Source Limitations: Lower Tamiami Aquifer Water Table Aquifer Annual(MG) 495 751 .68 Existing W ithdrawal Facilities -Ground Water Source: Water Table Aquifer 1 -8" X 45' X 200 GPM Well Cased to 35 Feet 2 -8" X 22' X 250 GPM Wells Cased to 15 Feet 1 -14" X 33' X 200 GPM Well Cased to 8 .5 Fe et 1 -8" X 22' X 200 GPM Well Cased to 11 .6 Feet 1 -8" X 25' X 200 GPM Well Cased to 15 Feet 1 -6" X 22' X 200 GPM Well Cased to 15 Feet 1 -6" X 45' X 160 GPM Well Cased to 35 Feet 1 -8" X 22' X 200 GPM Well Cased to 15 Feet Proposed Withdrawal Facilities -Ground Water Source: Lower Tamiami Aquifer 2 -10" X 180' X 810 GPM Wells Cased to 80 Feet 1 - 1 O" X 200' X 200 GPM Well Cased to 141 Feet Rated Capacity Source Water Table Aquifer Lower Tamiami Aquifer Totals: Status Code E p GPM 1,860 1 ,820 3,680 Page 2/13 080902 -11 GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY Monthly(MG) 41.25 62.64 MGM 81.4 79 .7 161.1 MGY 978 957 1,935 11-00148-W March 10 , 2010 Project Description The Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) Golden Gate service area includes the City of Golden Gate and portions of Golden Gate Estates, in Sections 15 through 17,20 through 22, and 27 through 29 of Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County Florida (Exhibits 1 and 2). The service area is located east of County Road 951 and slightly north of Interstate 75 (1-75). FGUA has eight existing Water Table Aquifer production wells and three proposed Lower Tamiami Aquifer production wells (Exhibit 3 and 4). FGUA operates two water treatment systems at the Golden Gate Water Treatment Plant. The two lime softening package plants have a combined treatment capacity of 1.224 million gallons per day (MGD). Reverse-osmosis (RO) treatment capability was added by Golden Gate Utilities in order to better treat the Water Table Aquifer water, which may have been affected by poor quality surface water in the GOlden Gate canal system. Initially, the two RO skids had a combined capacity of 0.50 MGD. The RO plant expansion, which was completed in 2006, increased RO capacity by 0.375 MGD. FGUA is currently in the design process to expand the RO facility by an additional 0.25 MGD. The expansion is to be served by the three proposed Lower Tamiami Aquifer wells. The total RO treatment capacity will be 1.125 MGD. Projected Water Use Demands The applicant requested a 20-year permit duration. Because the application was submitted in 2008, 20 year population projection extends only to 2028 (Exhibit 5), not 2030, the expiration date of the recommended permit. Based on a constant one-percent growth rate shown for the period 2023 through 2028, the 2030 population is estimated to be 17,533. Applying a raw water per capita use rate of 142 gallons per day and a maximum month peaking ratio of 1.07, the projected allocations for 2030 will be 908.0 MG annually and 81 MG per maximum month Originally, all raw water had been treated via lime softening. However, as the increase in future water demand is developed from the saline portion of the Lower Tamiami Aquifer, additional treatment capacity will require reverse osmosis processing. As more water is processed via reverse osmosis, the overall treatment efficiency will decline, from about 88 percent currently to about 77 percent by the expiration of the recommended permit. Thus, although the treated water per capita use rate remains constant at 109 gallons per capita day, the raw water per capita use rate increases from around 130 gallons per capita day in 2007 to 142 gallons per capita day by the expiration of the recommended permit. In addition to the recommended allocations, withdrawals from the Lower Tamiami Aquifer are limited to 495 MG annually and 41.3 MG per maximum month and withdrawals from the Water Table Aquifer are limited to 752 MG annually and 62.6 MG per maximum month, these quantities being the withdrawals the applicant simulated in the models and evaluated for impact assessment. Hydrologic Modeling Theis non-equilibrium flow Section 2.2.4 of the Basis of Review for Water Use Applications (BOR) within the South Florida Water Management District (District) stipulates that users that derive water supply from multiple withdrawal facilities shall submit a wellfield operating plan which may include more than one configuration of withdrawals provided each configuration meets the conditions of permit issuance. The applicant developed two model scenarios, one with a maximum withdrawal from the Water Table Aquifer of 63 million gallons per month, and another with a maximum withdrawal from the Lower Tamiami Aquifer of 41.25 million gallons per month. In each case, the withdrawals were modeled with COUAQ, a quasi three-dimensional analytical model developed for St. John's River Water Management District by Dr. Lou Motz. Each model was simulated for 90 days with no recharge. The Lower Tamiami Aquifer simulation divided the 41.25 MGM evenly among the three wells for a pumping rate of 60,941 cubic feet per day with the remainder of the maximum monthly allocation from the eight Water Table Aquifer wells. The parameters used for the Lower Tamiami Aquifer simulation are: transmissivity of 73,529 square feeVday, a storage coefficient of 0.000033 and a leakance of Page 3/13 080902-11 11-00148-W GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY March 10,2010 -, r •I 0.00055/day. The results of the model are provided as Exhibit 6. A cumulative model was simulated because other permitted users exist within the 1.0-foot cone of depression. The estimated cumulative impact from pumping the Lower Tamiami Aquifer is not expected to exceed 2.82 feet near the wells (Exhibit 7). The maximum use of Water Table Aquifer simulation (Exhibit 8) distributes the 63.05 MGM evenly among the eight Water Table Aquifer production wells for a pumping rate of 35,076 cubic feet per day with the remainder of the maximum monthly allocation from the three Lower Tamiami Aquifer wells. The parameters used for the Water Table Aquifer are: transmissivity of 53,495 square feeUday, a storage coefficient of 0.0005 and a leakance of 0.0027453/day. As with the Lower Tamiami Aquifer, a cumulative model was simulated, for the Water Table Aquifer, since there were other users within the area of influence. The cumulative model indicates a maximum drawdown of 4.05 feet near the wells (Exhibits 9). Impact Assessments Water Resource Availability Lower Tamiami Aquifer Based on data collected from an on-site test well, the Lower Tamiami Aquifer occurs between -31 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) and -167 feet NGVD. Therefore, the maximum developable limit, pursuant to Section 3.2.4 of the BaR, is -11 feet NGVD. The average end of dry season Lower Tamiami Aquifer water level in the vicinity of the project based on United States Geological Survey monitor well C-977, located 3.3 miles southeast of the wellfield, is approximately 7.2 feet above NGVD. Based on the model previously discussed, the maximum projected drawdown is 2.82 feet in the vicinity of the wells. Therefore the projected water level remains about 14 feet above the maximum developable limit. Based on this information, the potential for harm to occur to the sustained safe yield of the aquifer as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Water Table Aquifer The Water Table Aquifer extends to a depth of about -17 feet NGVD and consists of a combination of sand, limestone and marl. The aquifer's productivity is highly variable. The area is flat, with land surface at an approximate elevation of 11 feet NGVD and is bounded by the Golden Gate, 951, Green and 1-75 canals along the perimeter of the service area. The stage recorder GOLD 951 on the 951 Canal in the southwest corner of Golden Gate has minimum stage for the period of record (1982-2009) of 4.17 feet NGVD. Recorder GG-2_H, which is downstream of the City of Golden Gate by approximately two miles on the Golden Gate Canal, has minimum stage for the period of record (1982-2009) of 4.15 feet NGVD. The stages in these two canals are likely to influence the Water Table elevations throughout the Golden Gate area. Based upon a minimum water level of about 4 feet NGVD, and a maximum potential drawdown of 4.05 feet, as estimated by the model described in the Hydrologic Modeling Section, at least 17 feet of saturated thickness will remain in the aquifer in the vicinity of the production wells. The maximum drawdown projected in the vicinity of the canals is about 1.5 feet along a half-mile reach of the 951 Canal. The potential for harm to occur to the sustained safe yield of the canals or the aquifer as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Existing Legal Users Lower Tamiami Aquifer The nearest existing legal user, Azar Apartments (Water Use Permit 11-01221-W), may experience a predicted drawdown of less than 0.9 feet. The potential for harm to occur to existing legal users as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Page 4/13 080902-11 11-00148-W GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY March 10, 2010 .1 Water Table Aquifer The nearest permitted user of the Water Table Aquifer is Par One (Water Use Permit 11-00265-W) with wells located within 200 feet of FGUA's wells. Both users have had wells for over 15 years without interference problems. The estimated drawdowns described in the Hydrologic Modeling Section do not exceed 2.0 feet after 90 days of maximum allocation use. The planned increases are not anticipated to adversely impact the ability to withdraw water in the future. The potential for harm to occur to existing legal users as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Saline Water Intrusion Lower Tamiami Aquifer The presence of connate water in the Lower Tamiami Aquifer has been identified in the City of Golden Gate area. The specific conductance data collected during the test-hole drilling indicates that relatively fresh water exists at the top of the Lower Tamiami Aquifer (specific conductance of 1,680 micro Siemens/centimeter [uS/em) at 50 feet bls), but degrades quickly to more brackish water within a few feet (specific conductance of 4,130 uS/cm at 65 feet bls; 5,010 uS/cm at 80 feet bls). At a depth shallower than 140 feet bls, the specific conductance exceeds 6,000 uS/em. Specific conductance increased slightly (to 6,570 uS/em at 185 feet bls) in the confining clay unit below the Lower Tamiami Aquifer, but was measurably lower in the Sandstone Aquifer (4,900 uS/cm at 235 feet bls). The high salinity of the Lower Tamiami Aquifer is postulated to be the result of connate water that has not been completely flushed from the aquifer or diluted by freshwater recharge from the Water Table Aquifer. Since 1994 the Permittee routinely samples seven monitor wells, two (Well A, which is 22 feet deep, and Well B, which is 45 feet deep) completed in the Water Table Aquifer, four (Well C, 65 feet deep, Well 0, 101 feet deep, Well E, 52 feet deep, and Well F, 60 feet deep) completed in the Lower Tamiami Aquifer, and one (Well G, 240 feet deep) completed in the Sandstone Aquifer. Since 1994, the Wells C and 0 (Exhibits 10 and 11) have shown a generally declining salinity trend, with a brief elevation in 2006, and Wells E and F (Exhibits 12 and 13) have shown an overall declining trend. The proposed Lower Tamiami Aquifer public supply wells are intended to tap the lower portion of the aquifer, which is the most saline. The brackish water will be treated by the reverse osmosis system at the water treatment plant. An extensive saline monitoring program is already in place to detect any changes to water quality in the aquifer. Because the saline water will not come into contact with fresh water before treatment, and the reject water will not come into contact with fresh water after treatment, the potential for saline water intrusion to occur as a result of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. However, continued monitoring is required by Limiting Condition 27. Water Table Aquifer Although the wellfield is located approximately seven miles east of Gulf of Mexico, the potential for saline water intrusion exists due to the presence of connate water within the Lower Tamiami Aquifer. Since 1994 the Permittee has been collecting water quality samples from seven monitor wells. The two Water Table Aquifer wells showed a trend of declining chloride concentrations for about one year then a steady to slightly declining trend in salinity, generally less than 200 milligrams per liter (Exhibits 14 and 15). The data indicate that withdrawals from the uppermost portion of the Water Table Aquifer produce fresher water. Withdrawals from the two deeper production wells, GG-3 and GG-4, should be carefully managed to reduce the potential upconing of connate water from the underlying Lower Tamiami Aquifer. In general, maximum monthly water use from each well has not exceeded 6.5 MG, and water quality deterioration has not occurred. Therefore, maximum month withdrawals from wells GG-3 and GG-4 are limited to 6.5 MG each to provide assurances that water quality deterioration shall not occur. Monitoring, required by Limiting Condition 27, and withdrawal management should ensure the potential for saline water intrusion to occur as a result of the recommended allocation is minimal. Page 5/13 080902-11 11-00148-W GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY March 10,2010 II . I Wetlands Lower Tamiami Aquifer There are no protected wetlands in the city limits of Golden Gate. The site was drained by a series of canals in the 1960's. Further, the Golden Gate Water Treatment Plant and wellfield is surrounded by an existing development. Therefore, the potential for harm to occur to wetlands as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Water Table Aquifer There are no protected wetland environments in the city limits of Golden Gate, and SFWMD staff has field-verified there are no wetlands within the one-foot drawdown contour resulting from the proposed withdrawal. In addition, the potential drawdowns from the FGUA's withdrawals are not likely to extend beyond the Golden Gate area due to the canals that border the perimeter; therefore, the potential for harm to occur to wetlands as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Source Of Pollution Lower Tamiami Aquifer Based on data collected from well MW-G, 14 feet of confining clay (from 28 to 42 feet bls) separates the Water Table Aquifer from the underlying Lower Tamiami Aquifer, which extends to 178 feet bls. The potential for movement of contaminants as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Water Table Aquifer The nearest source of pollution is the Naples Sanitary Landfill, which is located approximately 11,000 feet to the southeast of the Golden Gate wellfield. Based on the results of the groundwater simulation described in the Hydrologic Modeling Section, the drawdown at the landfill resulting from pumpage at Golden Gate will be less than 0.1 feet. Collier County's wellhead protection ordinance has four protection zones that are based on travel times of migration of a possible contaminant. The outermost zone covers an area surrounding the wellfield with an approximate radius of one mile. The potential for the induced movement of contaminants from known sources of pollution to occur as a result of the withdrawal of the recommended allocation is considered minimal. Additional Information LEGAL CONTROL OVER PROJECT SITE AND WITHDRAWAL FACILITIES The applicant has provided proof of ownership. COMPATIBLE LAND USE The project is existing, with a previously permitted allocation for public water supply. The land use remains the same. CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE Pursuant to Limiting Condition 17, every five years from the date of calibration of each facility, the Permittee shall submit re-calibration data for each of the water accounting facilities. Pursuant to Limiting Condition 18, monthly withdrawals for each withdrawal facility shall be submitted to the District quarterly. Pursuant to Limiting Condition 20, the Permittee shall determine unaccounted-for distribution system losses beginning within six months of Permit issuance and report the losses to the District annually. Page 6/13 080902-11 11-00148-W GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY March 10,2010 ....-.i ,,:, '. ~i •1 Additional Information Pursuant to Limiting Condition 22, the Permittee shall provide a long term plan for developing an future alternative water supply. Pursuant to Limiting Condition 23, every five years from the date of permit issuance, the permittee shall submit a water conservation plan for review and approval by District Staff, which addresses the results of a water conservation audit that documents the efficiency of water use on the project site using data produced from an on-site evaluation conducted and a comparison of the permitted allocation and the allocation that would apply to the project based on current District allocation rules and updated population and per capita use rates. Pursuant to Limiting Condition 27, the ongoing saline water monitoring program require monthly data collection and quarterly data submission of: 1) Water levels measured at Monitor Wells A through G (measured immediately prior to any sampling). 2) Water quality analyses for conductivity and chloride concentration of water from Monitor Wells A through G; the wells will be purged by pumping prior to obtaining a water sample . 3) Water quality analyses for conductivity and chloride concentration of water from the Lower Tamiami Aquifer production wells; the wells will be purged by pumping (using the permanent well pump) prior to obtaining a water sample. Pursuant to Limiting Condition 28, every five years from the date of issuance the Permittee shall submit a water use compliance report, as outlined. ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY AND WATER CONSERVATION PLAN In accordance with Section 2.6.1 of the BOR, all public water supply utilities applying for an Individual Permit are required to develop and implement a water conservation plan. The water conservation elements are described in Exhibit 16. PERMIT DURATION Pursuant to Section 1.7.2.2.C of the BOR, Staff recommends a permit duration of 20 years. WATER RESERVATION FOR THE PICAYUNE STRAND AND FAKAHATCHEE ESTUARY The projected drawdowns in the Water Table Aquifer and the Lower Tamiami Aquifer remain more than five miles from the nearest Picayune Strand and Fakahatchee Estuary waterbody. The withdrawal of the recommended allocation will not withdraw reserved water. Page 7/13 080902-11 11-00148-W GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY March 10, 2010 .l Recommendations Project Name: GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY Application Number: 080902-11 ., Permit Number: 11-00148-W Date Of Issuance: Recommendations to Executive Director: Staff recommends renewal of Water Use Permit for public water supply for the City of Golden Gate. Withdrawals are from Lower Tamiami Aquifer via three proposed withdrawal facilities and from the Water Table Aquifer via eight existing withdrawal facilities. The use is reasonable-beneficial, will not interfere . '. ~ with any presently existing legal use of water and is consistent with the public interest. The use is further subject to 28 limiting conditions . ~1( Application Reviewer: L. \. Date: J-/). if j;0 \ul'.Craig Boom6aar ,P.G 111 ( ~ Supervisor: -----------+-l-:--L---'''--Date: fVf-No~h B. Kugler, P.G. Water Use Division: ----(\--,t"~--A~n~~_~,---_Date: 2-1z-1/(iJ----l... A/1M_/\A---,/>~~. Page 8/13 080902-11 11-00148-W GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY March 10,2010 II Limiting Conditions 1. This permit shall expire on March 10, 2030. 2. Application for a permit modification may be made at any time. 3. Water use classification: " Public water supply 4. Source classification is: Ground Water from: Lower Tamiami Aquifer Water Table Aquifer 5. Annual allocation shall not exceed 909 MG. Maximum monthly allocation shall not exceed 81 MG. The following limitations to annual withdrawals from specific sources are stipulated: Water Table Aquifer-: 752 MG. Lower Tamiami Aquifer-: 495 MG. The following limitations to maximum monthly withdrawals from specific sources are slipulated: Water Table Aquifer-: 62.64 MG. Lower Tamiami Aquifer-: 41.25 MG. The maximum monthly withdrawal from wells GG-3 and GG-4 shall not exceed 6.5 MG for each well. 6. Pursuant to Rule 40E-1.6105, F.A.C., Notification of Transfer of Interest in Real Property, within 30 days of any transfer of interest or control of the real property at which any permitted facility, system, consumptive use, or activity is located, the permittee must notify the District, in writing, of the transfer giving the name and address of the new owner or person in control and providing a copy of the instrument effectuating the transfer, as set forth in Rule 40E-1.6107, FAC. Pursuant to Rule 40E-1.61 07 (4), until transfer is approved by the District, the permittee shall be liable for compliance with the permit. The permittee transferring the permit shall remain liable for all actions that are required as well as all violations of the permit which occurred prior to the transfer of the permit. Failure to comply with this or any other condition of this permit constitutes a violation and pursuant to Rule 40E-1.609, Suspension, Revocation and Modification of Permits, the District may suspend or revoke the permit. This Permit is issued to: FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY 280 WEKIVA SPRINGS RD #2000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779-6026 7. Withdrawal Facilities: Ground Water -Existing: Page 9/13 080902-11 11-00148-W GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY March 10, 2010 · I I" Limiting Conditions 1 -8" X 22' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 15 Feet 1 -8" X 22' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 11.6 Feet 1 -6" X 22' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 15 Feet 2 -8" X 22' X 250 GPM Wells Cased To 15 Feet 1 -6" X 45' X 160 GPM Well Cased To 35 Feet 1 -8" X 45' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 35 Feet 1 -14" X 33' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 8.5 Feet 1 -8" X 25' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 15 Feet Ground Water -Proposed: 2 -10" X 180' X 810 GPM Wells Cased To 80 Feet 1 -10" X 200' X 200 GPM Well Cased To 141 Feet 8. Permittee shall mitigate interference with existing legal uses that was caused in whole or in part by the permittee's withdrawals, consistent with the approved mitigation plan. As necessary to offset the interference, mitigation will include pumpage reduction, replacement of the impacted individual's equipment, relocation of wells, change in withdrawal source, or other means. Interference to an existing legal use is defined as an impact that occurs under hydrologic conditions equal to or less severe than a 1 in 10 year drought event that results in the: (1) Inability to withdraw water consistent with provisions of the permit, such as when remedial structural or operational actions not materially authorized by existing permits must be taken to address the interference; or (2) Change in the quality of water pursuant to primary State Drinking Water Standards to the extent that the water can no longer be used for its authorized purpose, or such change is imminent. 9. Permittee shall mitigate harm to existing off-site land uses caused by the permittee's withdrawals, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance. When harm occurs, or is imminent, the District will require the permittee to modify withdrawal rates or mitigate the harm. Harm as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance, includes: (1) Significant reduction in water levels on the property to the extent that the designed function of the water body and related surface water management improvements are damaged, not including aesthetic values. The designed function of a water body is identified in the original permit or other governmental authorization issued for the construction of the water body. In cases where a permit was not required, the designed function shall be determined based on the purpose for the original construction of the water body (e.g. fill for construction, mining, drainage canal, etc.) (2) Damage to agriculture, including damage resulting from reduction in soil moisture resulting from consumptive use; or (3) Land collapse or subsidence caused by reduction in water levels associated with consumptive use. 10. Permittee shall mitigate harm to the natural resources caused by the permittee's withdrawals, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance. When harm occurs, or is imminent, the District will reqUire the permittee to modify withdrawal rates or mitigate the harm. Harm, as determined through reference to the conditions for permit issuance includes: (1) Reduction in ground or surface water levels that results in harmful lateral movement of the fresh Page 10/13 080902-11 11-00148-W GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY March 10.2010 ~I 1 ,.1 .' ".1 Limiting Conditions water/salt water interface, (2) Reduction in water levels that harm the hydroperiod of wetlands, (3) Significant reduction in water levels or hydroperiod in a naturally occurring water body such as a lake or pond, (4) Harmful movement of contaminants in violation of state water quality standards, or (5) Harm to the natural system including damage to habitat for rare or endangered species. 11. If any condition of the permit is violated, the permit shall be subject to review and possible modification, enforcement action, or revocation . 12. Authorized representatives of the District shall be permitted to enter, inspect, and observe the permitted system to determine compliance with special conditions. 13. The Permittee is advised that this permit does not relieve any person from the requirement to obtain all necessary federal, state, local and special district authorizations. 14. The permit does not convey any property right to the Permittee, nor any rights and privileges other than those specified in the Permit and Chapter 40E-2, Florida Administrative Code. 15. Permittee shall submit all data as required by the implementation schedule for each of the limiting conditions to: S.F.W.M.D., Supervising Hydrogeologist -Post-Permit Compliance, Water Use Regulation Dept. (4320), P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680. 16. In the event of a declared water shortage, water withdrawal reductions will be ordered by the District in accordance with the Water Shortage Plan, Chapter 40E-21, FAC. The Permittee is advised that during a water shortage, pumpage reports shall be submitted as required by Chapter 40E-21, FAC. 17. Prior to the use of any proposed water withdrawal facility authorized under this permit, unless otherwise specified, the Permittee shall equip each facility with a District-approved operating water use accounting system and submit a report of calibration to the District, pursuant to Section 4.1, Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications. In addition, the Permittee shall submit a report of recalibration for the water use accounting system for each water withdrawal facility (existing and proposed) authorized under this permit every five years from each previous calibration, continuing at five-year increments. 18. Monthly withdrawals for each withdrawal facility shall be submitted to the District quarterly. The water accounting method and means of calibration shall be stated on each report. 19. The Permittee shall notify the District within 30 days of any change in service area boundary. If the Permittee will not serve a new demand within the service area for which the annual allocation was calculated, the annual allocation may then be subject to modification and reduction. 20. Permittee shall determine unaccounted-for distribution system losses. Losses shall be determined for the entire distribution system on a monthly basis. Permittee shall define the manner in which unaccounted-for losses are calculated. Data collection shall begin within six months of Permit issuance. Loss reporting shall be submitted to the District on a yearly basis from the date of Permit issuance. 21. Permittee shall maintain an accurate flow meter at the intake of the water treatment plant for the purpose of measuring daily inflow of water. 22. Prior to any application to renew or modify this permit, the Permittee shall evaluate long term water supply alternatives and submit a long term water supply plan to the District. Within one year of permit issuance, the Permittee shall submit to the District an outline of the proposed plan. The assessment Page 11/13 080902-11 11-00148-W GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY March 10, 2010 !., .1 .. ' .. 1 '1 Limiting Conditions should include consideration of saline intrusion, wellfield protection, plans for compliance with applicable wellfield protection ordinances, expected frequencies and plans to cope with water shortages or well field failures, and conservation measures to reduce overall stresses on the aquifer . 23. The Water Conservation Plan required by Section 2.6.1 of the Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District, must be implemented in accordance with the approved implementation schedule. 24. If a proposed well location is different from a location specified in the application, the Permittee shall submit to the District an evaluation of the impact of pumpage from the proposed well location on adjacent existing legal uses, pollution sources, environmental features, the saline water interface, and water bodies one month prior to all new well construction. The Permittee is advised that the proposal must be in compliance with all permitting criteria and performance standards in effect at the time of submittal, and that a formal modification of the permit shall be required if the withdrawals from the well location will result in an environmental or resource impact significantly greater than that anticipated in the permit review process. 25. If at any time there is an indication that the well casing, valves, or controls leak or have become inoperative, repairs or replacement shall be made to restore the system to an operating condition. Failure to make such repairs shall be cause for filling and abandoning the well, in accordance with procedures outlined in Chapters 40E-3 and 40E-30, Florida Administrative Code. 26. The Permittee shall submit to the District aQ updated Well Description Table (Table A) within one month of completion of the proposed wells identifying the actual total and cased depths, pump manufacturer and model numbers, pump types, intake depths and type of meters. 27. The Permittee shall continue to submit monitoring data in accordance with the approved saline water intrusion monitoring program for this project. This plan requires monthly data collection and quarterly data submission of: 1) Water levels measured at Monitor Wells A through G (measured immediately prior to any sampling). 2) Water quality analyses for conductivity and chloride concentration of water from Monitor Wells A through G; the wells will be purged by pumping prior to obtaining a water sample. 3) Water quality analyses for conductivity and chloride concentration of water from the Lower Tamiami Aquifer production wells; the wells will be purged by pumping (using the permanent well pump) prior to obtaining a water sample. 28. Every five years from the date of permit issuance, the permittee shall submit a water use compliance report for review and approval by District Staff, which addresses the following: 1. The results of a water conservation audit that documents the efficiency of water use on the project site using data produced from an onsite evaluation conducted. In the event that the audit indicates additional water conservation is appropriate or the per capita use rate authorized in the permit is exceeded, the permittee shall propose and implement specific actions to reduce the water use to acceptable levels within timeframes proposed by the permittee and approved by the District. 2. A comparison of the permitted allocation and the allocation that would apply to the project based on current District allocation rules and updated population and per capita use rates. In the event the permit allocation is greater than the allocation provided for under District rule, the permittee shall apply for a letter modification to reduce the allocation consistent with District rules and the updated population and per capita use rates to the extent they are considered by the District to be indicative of Page 12/13 080902-11 11-00148-W GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY March 10.2010 1'1 Limiting Conditions .' long term trends in the population and per capita use rates over the permit duration. In the event that the permit allocation is less than allowable under District rule, the permittee shall apply for a modification of the permit to increase the allocation if the permittee intends to utilize an additional allocation, or modify its operation to comply with the existing conditions of the permit. -,. : ,: .t Page 13/13 080902-11 11-00148-W GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY March 10, 2010 R25 R26 R 27 R 28 R 29 R30 R 31 R32 R33 R 34 : ..\." -'.i T Project Site COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA N Legend A Application Map Date: 11/5/2009 OApplication Sections Application Number: 080902-11 Permit Number: 11-00148-W Project Name: GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY o 10 20 Miles I Exhibit: 1 .1 29TH AVE SW 21ST AVE SW WHITE BLVD 27TH AVE SW 11TH AVE sW 19TH AVE SW 13TH AVE SW 23RDAVE SW 17TH AVE SW 25TH AVE SW t--_15_T_H_A_V_E_s_W__~; 15TH AVE SW 11TH AVE SW 13TH AVE SW SW 12TH AVE PINE RIDGE RD sW 10TH AVE SW 12TH AVE i\~ :I SEA GRASS LN ~ Q:o w Q: :!E w C) r--"""C Wj II) o 1 GO~DEN GATE PKY ".. ! J, ' ..I Map Date: 1/21/2010 Exhibit: 2 N A o _____..IJI3'7~OO~========~7,~OO Feel COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Legend V Z/i Application Application Number: 080902-11 Permit Number: 11-00148-W Project Name: GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA N Legend A Application Map Date: 2/12/2010• Wells Application Number: 080902-11 Permit Number: 11-00148-W Project Name: GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY o 125 250 Feel I Exhibit: 3 Page 1 ...... ,r _ ._. -. rrL"~·,~·· r , t; .J ::J ,,,.t i 17 f -. TABLE - A Description Of Wells. Application Number: 080902-11 WelllD Name 101519 GG-10 101520 GG-11 193954 GG-12 193955 GG-13 217311 GG-14 139075 MW-A Map Designator FLUWID Number GG-10 GG-11 GG-12 GG-13 GG-14 MW-A Well Field Existing/Proposed E E P P P E Well Diameter(lnches) Total Depth(feet) 8 22 8 25 10 180 10 180 10 200 4 22 Cased Depth(feet) Facility Elev. (ft. NGVDj Screened Interval From 11.6 15 80 80 141 19 To Pumped Or Flowing P P P P P Pump Type Pump Int. Elev. Feet (NGVD) submersible 16 submersible 16 submersible 16 submersible 16 submersible 16 none 16 Feet (BLS) 12.35 7.5 40 40 40 Pump Capacity(GPM) Year Drilled 200 200 810 810 200 0 Planar Location Source Feet East DIGITIZED 428438 DIGITIZED 428545 428447 DIGITIZED 428385 DIGITIZED 428542 428513 m >< ::::J_. 0 r-+ Z 0.. ~ Feet North Accounting Method Use Status Water Use Type Aquifer 671991 flow meter Standby Public Water Supply Monitor Water Table Aquifer 671945 flow meter Standby Public Water Supply Water Table Aquifer 672202 flow meter Primary Public Water Supply Lower Tamiami Aquifer 672092 flow meter Primary Public Water Supply Lower Tamiami Aquifer 672212 flow meter Primary Public Water Supply Lower Tamiami Aquifer 671845 none Monitor Monitor Water Table Aquifer Page 2 ...-1 -, . '.r ; t ~ . ~-•'.~ ~. l .. -l' ~..!..:! r·,1 l"f U .. --, - TABLE - A Description Of Wells. Application Number: 080902-11 WelllD Name 139076 MW-B 139077 MW-C 139078 MW-D 139079 MW-E 139080 MW-F 193956 MW-G Map Designator FLUWID Number MW-B MW-C MW-D MW-E MW-F MW-G Well Field EXistinglProposed E E E E E E Well Diameter(lnches) Total Depth(feet) 4 45 4 65 4 101 4 52 4 60 4 240 Cased Depth(feet) Facility Elev. (ft. NGVD) Screened Interval From 42 62 98 50 57 230 To Pumped Or Flowing Pump Type Pump In!. Elev. Feet (NGVD) none none 16 none 16 none 16 none 16 none Feet (BLS) Pump Capacity(GPM) Year Drilled 0 0 0 0 0 0 m >< =s- O- Planar Location Source Feet East Feet North Accounting Method Use Status 428513 671873 none Monitor 428597 672127 none Monitor APPLICANT 428597 672071 none Monitor APPLICANT 428583 671986 none Monitor 428343 671774 none Monitor 428404 672116 none Monitor Z 0.. ~ Water Use Type Aquifer Monitor Water Table Aquifer Monitor Lower Tamiami Aquifer Monitor Lower Tamiami Aquifer Monitor Lower Tamiami Aquifer Monitor Lower Tamiami Aquifer Monitor Sandstone Aquifer Page 3 .~J J f"~ ~\r ~r _ __ TABLE - A Description Of Wells. Application Number: 080902-11 m ><::::J 0 r-+ z o ~ WelllD Name Map Designator FLUWID Number Well Field EXisting/Proposed Well Diameter(lnches) Total Depth(feet) Cased Depth(feet) Facility Elev. (ft. NGVD) Screened Interval From To Pumped Or Flowing Pump Type Pump Int. Elev. Feet (NGVD) Feet (BLS) Pump Capacity(GPM) Year Drilled Planar Location Source Feet East Feet North Accounting Method Use Status Water Use Type Aquifer 101516 GG-2A GG-2A E 8 22 15 P submersible o 200 1988 DIGITIZED 428476 671823 flow meter Production Public Water Supply Monitor Water Table Aquifer Page 4 J, Table 1 Past Population, Connections and Water Usage ••.1 •1 Year ERC's Past Water System Population Finished Per Capita Usage (GPO) Finished Water Demand Avg . Month (MG) Finished Water Demand Max. Month (MG) Raw Per Capita Usage (GPO) Raw Water Demand Avg. Month (MG) Raw Water Demand Max. Month (MG) Raw Total Annual (MG) 2003 4188 13402 97 39.63 42.13 110 44.87 48.74 538.47 2004 4211 13475 101 41.70 44.66 119 48.86 51,92 586,34 2005 4263 13642 109 45.35 48,25 130 53,89 57,19 646.72 2006 4344 13901 109 46.11 50.83 134 56,69 59,56 680,33 2007 4358 13946 104 44.13 46.98 130 55.05 60.50 660.56 Table 2 Projected Populations, Connections and Water Usage .,, Year ERC's Projected Finished Finished Finished Raw Raw Raw Raw Water Per Capita Water Water Per Water Water Total System Usage Demand Demand Capita Demand Demand Annual Population (GPO) Avg. Max. Usage Avg. Max. (MG) Month Month (GPO) Month Month (MG) (MG) (MG) (MG) 2008 4402 14086 109 46.70 50.44 I 134 57.41 61.43 688.97 2009 4446 14227 109 47.17 50.94 134 5799 62.05 695.86 2010 4490 14370 109 47.64 51.45 138' 60.32 64.54 723.79 2011 4535 14513 109 48.12 51.97 138" 60.92 65.18 731.03 2012 4581 14658 109 48.60 52.49 138" 61.53 65.84 738.34 2013 4627 14805 109 49.08 53.01 138" 62.14 66.49 745.73 2014 4673 14953 109 49.58 53.54 138' 62.77 67.16 753.18 2015 4720 15103 109 50.07 54.08 142" I 65.23 69.80 782.76 2016 4767 15254 109 50.57 54.62 142" 65.88 70.49 790.59 2017 4814 15406 109 51.08 55.16 142' 66.54 71.20 798.50 2018 4863 15560 109 51.59 55.72 142" 67.21 71.91 806.48 2019 4911 15716 109 52.10 56.27 142" 67.88 72.63 814.55 2020 4960 15873 109 52.63 56.84 142' 68.56 73.36 822.69 2021 5010 16032 109 53.15 57.40 142' 69.24 74.09 830.92 2022 5060 16192 109 53.68 57.98 142" 69.94 74.83 839.23 2023 5111 16354 109 54.22 58.56 142' 70.64 75.58 847.62 2024 5162 16517 109 54.76 59.14 142' 71.34 76.34 856.10 2025 5213 16683 109 55.31 59.73 142· 72.05 77.10 864.66 2026 5265 16849 109 55.86 60.33 142· 72.78 77.87 873.31 2027 5318 17018 109 56.42 60.94 142· 73.50 78.65 882.04 2028 5371 17188 109 56.99 61.54 142' 74.24 79.43 890.86 *The increase in estimated per capita raw water usage in 2010 and subsequent years will coincide with the completion of the phase IV RO expansion (0.25 MGD) and then an additional 0.25 MGD RO expansion in 2015 with membrane housing already being designed for as part of the phase IV RO expansion. As the GG WTP shifts treatment from lime softening towards RO there is a decrease in the plant's efficiency to process raw water which results in more raw water being rejected to produce the same amount of finished water. Exhibit 5 .,"1 ill ,I : l , ,I .-,( Drawdown in the Lower Tamiami Aquifer, Golden Gate Withdrawal Only Exhibit 6 'Tj --, ,I :'-. , I :... " 1 ( :' .... ' :.,'1 ; I ..../ -, Cumulative Drawdown in the Lower Tamiami Aquifer Exhibit 7 Drawdown in the Water Table Aquifer, Golden Gate Withdrawal Only Exhibit 8 Cumulative Drawdown in the Water Table Aquifer (Regional Extent) Exhibit 9A ,/! I , 4/ oJ Cumulative Drawdown in the Water Table Aquifer Exhibit 98 -'I ,·'"1 J~ .,. .7 ·n -I "r l cY 0 '.. I I ~ .,.,. >I-.....J I :J .'":,l· .....J -::(.( I-~ Z ~ LLI z: U I UZ Ll.I U > u.. = 0 <1J LJ 3: ..:( E 00 ' a::: ~ <1J 0 "tl .....J w.. '- 0 .J::.Q) UE ....(t\ ,.. <1JZ ..... E u (II Q) '--' ,o :s I-(J (IICL. 0:: $ I CO '=t ..... 0 I .-I ..... '#: E I Q) 0 1E 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ro0, 2009-06-30 2009-02-28 2008-10-31 2008-06-30 2008-02-29 2007-09-30 2007-05-31 2007-01-31 2006-09-30:::= .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 lO V N 2006-05-31 2006-01-30 2005-09-27 2005-05-31 2005-01-28 2004-09-23 2004-05-17 2004-01-31 2003-08-31 2003-04-30 2002-12-26 2002-08-31 2002-04-30 2001-12-31 \IJ... '" Q co... '"\IJ 2001-08-31 2001-04 -30 Cl. Cl.=: 2000-12-31 2000-08-31 2000-04-12 1999-12-13 1999-08-18 1999-04-13 1998-12-20 1998-08-30 1998-01-20 1997-09-30 1997-02-24 1996-10-15 1996-06-26 1996-02-21 1995-10-16 1995-06-22 1995-02-07 1994-10-04 1994-06-07 ....J-(9 :2: 0 L() CD Q) :::J ro > ..c .Ql I 0 1994-02-16 () Q) 0 (J) ('/!)~) anlllA Exhibit 10 jl I: > f-c:t: 0 I f ::J « > f , ,I -l -,! I :::l .i.. ;::~ 7>-:2: LUI .::. U lJZ UL1.I > u.. ~ lJ ~ ..::( E 00 ~- "c:t: ~ 0-0 .....J u... 0 (1) -= UE ~ I'tS CZ QI ...... E u ~ (1) l....., ,o ~ ~ fj CL. ~ a:: ~ I 0:) ~ ..... 0 0 I ..... ..... '#: ...... E, (1) CL. 0 0 Lrl v' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lrl 0 Lrl 0 Lrl Lrl0, (>""I' (>""I' N' N'v' -' 2009-06-30 2009-02-28 2008-10-31 2008-06-30 2008-02-29 2007-09-30 2007-05-31 2007-01-31 2006-09-30 2006-05-31 2006-01-30 2005-09-27 2005-05-31 2005-01-28 2004-09-23 2004-05-17 2004-01-31 2003-08-31 2003-04-30 2002-12-26 2002-08-31 2002-04-30 2001-12-31 2001-08-31 2001-04-30 "; Q c... "" " -c.. c.. ':! 2000-12-31 2000-08-31 2000-04 -12 1999-12-13 1999-08-18 1999-04-13 1998-12-20 1998-08-30 1998-01-20 1997-09-30 1997-02-24 1996-10-15 1996-06-26 1996-02-21 1995-10-16 1995-06-22 1995-02-07 1994-10-04 1994-06-07 --l <3 2 0 0 0 'Ot OJ :::J ro > ..c .2> I 0 1994-02-16 () <I> 0.. (/) ('/!)~) anlllA Exhibit 11 /1.-, l~ ;:.: .~ "[1 '0' .1 .. I ~ l e::: .."', 0.. I ~ .'.. <{ , r·u I... -li ...1 ·..·...1 I ~ ....J :t <{lei I-$ ," Z~w-I .:::. U t,)Z UW > u.. 0 Qi lJ ~ E 0 0 ~- 'a::: Qi 0 -0 Ll... 0 ~ or;(J) UE ('(j ""'I: Z QJ ..... E U QJ ~(J) '--' ::lo lj... 0.. QJ ~ ~ I CO <o:::t ....... 0 0 I , ~::;; (~ ~[):- ~.. (~ t ~ i' , ....... ~ ~ ..... E... (J) 0.. 2009-06-30 2009-02-28 2008-10-31 2008-06-30 2008-02-29 2007-09-30 2007-05-31 2007-01-31 2006-09-30 2006-05-31 2006-01-30 2005-09-27 2005-05-31 2005-01-28 2004-09-23 2004-05-17 2004 -01-31 2003-08-31 2003-04-30 2002-12-26 11.1 2002-08-31 :; Q 2002-04-30 ...Cl 2001-12-31 '"11.1 -....2001-08-31 .... c!2001-04 -30 2000-12-31 2000-08-31 2000-04-12 1999-12-13 1999-08-18 1999-04-13 1998-12-20 1998-08-30 1998-01-20 1997-09-30 1997-02-24 1996-10-15 ....J-... C91996-06-26 :2: 01996-02-21 0 ("') 1995-10-16 Q) :::J 1995-06-22 cu >1995-02-07 ..c .Ql1994-10-04 I .. 1994-06-07 .. () 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co lD LJ'l -<r"" ('t!)~) Q)1994-02-16 0..0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C/) (Y) N anlllA Exhibit 12 -- 11 " .'-J .:... .;:: ..., 2009-06-30 2009-02-26 d 2008-10-31 2006-06-30 :3 "r1 I2006-02-29 -2007-09-30a:: 2007-05-31 ..~I I~_l 2007-01-31 .> f-I ;:) 2006-09-30 -.:J:: 2006-05-31:.'~ , r" .I I2006-01-30 -.J 2005-09-27 .~. : 2005-05-31 2005-01-26 :il -.J 2004-09-22~:r ~I2004-05-17'$Z UJ :a 2004-01-31:a U I 2003-06-31uZ uw 2003-04-30 > L.l.. 2002-12-260 QI &J LJ ~ 2002-08-31 1il E Q 2002-04-30 Cl..00 ~ 2001-12-31 '"&J"'a:: QI Q,2001-06-31 Q,0 "0 ~..J ~ 2001-04-30L.J.. 0 .r:. 2000-12-31Q) U 2000-06-31E ....<'tl C 2000-04-12Z QI ....., 1999-12-13E u QI 1999-08-18Q).-. ~ ~ 1999-04-13e rj QIa.. 1996-12-200::: ~ 1996-06-30 I 1996-01-20 1997-09-30 CO ,....; 1997-02-24 1996-10-15 -J 0 I ,....; <.'J1996-06-26,....; ::2: 01996-02-21 L{) N1995-10-16....., OJ :::J '* 1995-06-22 roE >~ 1995-02-07 J:::.Q) .Q>Q.. 1994-10-04 I .. ......1994-06-07 () OJ1994-02-16 C. c::> c::> c::> c::> c::> c::> c::>c::> c::> c::> c::> c::> c::> (f) co u:> Lrl N"' Exhibit 13 f: ,. I 0' :;::. "rl 'I cc; 2009-06-30 2009-02-28..I ,'... ..I ' 2008-10-31 2008-06-30 " ' ) r 2008-02-29f--2007-09-30cr: 2007-05-31.I 0 ,'''' I 2007-01-31f-.....' 2006-09-30 ~ :.0_" 2006-05-31 >2006-01-30f- 2005-09-27 .) 2005-05-31·-'·.i f- ~ 2005-01-28 --J « 2004-09-23 f--~ 2004-05-17>Z w ~ I 2004-01-31 ~ U 2003-08-31uZ UUJ 2003-04-30 > 1.1.. 2002-12-26-CJ,J G.J lJ ~ 2002-08-31 :;; Q ~ E 2002-04-30 ... = ..,0 0 lo. 2001-12-31 G.J-14a:: CJ,J -Cl.2001-08-31 Cl.0 "0 o:rlo. 2001-04-30w.. 0 2000-12-31~Q) u 2000-08-31E ...res :: 2000-04-12Z CJ,J ..... E 1999-12-13 u CJ,J Q) lo. 1999-08-18.'--' ::::l 1999-04-13 ~2 CJ,JCL 1998-12-20c:C $: 1998-08-30 I ex) 1998-01-20 "¢ 1997-09-30.-1 1997-02-24o o 1996-10-15 ...JI <:3.-1 1996-06-26 ~ o1996-02-21-o N1995-10-16 Q) ~ 1995-06-22 roE >I1995-02-07 ..cQ) OJ CL 1994-10-04 I .. ......1994-06-07 o Q)1994-02-16 0..o 0 0 0 0 0 0 (f)o 0 0 (Y)N N '" '"'" ("!)~) anl~A Exhibit 14 I •f ~ ,.-J t ::: .~' 1. -n ·:1 2009-07-31 2009-03-31 2008-11-30,.,1 2008-07-31 2008-03-31> 2007-10-31 0::: 2007-06-300..' 2007-02-28I,,"' I2006-10-31::) ~ 2006-06-30 ,,2006-02-28-I' I-2005-10-31....J I2005-06-30 ::J 2005-02-28 ....J 2004-10-26~ ~I2004-06-24$Z :;E 2004-02-24W I ~ lJ 2003-10-18lJZ U 2003-05-30L.L.J > ~ 2003-01-150 III GJ 2002-09-30 :;:.lJ "'" E Q 2002-05-31 co...:t: ...0 0 I2002-01-31..... '"GJ0::: CIi 2001-09-30 ...0 '0 ...=:....J .. 2001-05-31LJ... 0 2001-01-31.:.OJ u 2000-09-30E ~ '"'I: 2000-05-17 CIiZ 2000-01-14.>-J E u III a,) I1999-08-18 .-' , :::l 1999-04-13e 0'" CIi0.. 1998-12-20~ 1998-08-30~ I 1998-01-20CO -=t 1997-09-30 .-1 1997-02-240 0 1996-10-15I ....-I 1996-06-26 ....-I 1996-02-21 ~ 1995-10-16 "-' 1995-06-22E ~ 1995-02-07OJ 0.. 1994-10-04 1994-06-07 U <1l1994-02-16 a.o o 0 o o o o o o 0 lJ"l o lJ"l o lJ"l <=> lJ"l o lJ"l (f) "<T "<T ..... ..... N N - Exhibit 15 .1' 'TI ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY AND WATER CONSERVATION PLAN In accordance with BOR Section 2.6.1, all public water supply utilities applying for an Individual Permit are required to develop and implement a water conservation plan. The water. conservation elements are identified below as Items A-H, and have been implemented prior to ..... this permit modification . '.~ A: Permanent Irrigation Ordinance: A permanent irrigation ordinance (Number 02-17) has been enacted by Collier County. This ordinance provides for residential watering three days per week and is superseded by SFWMD emergency water shortage restrictions, as applicable . .\' -·r B: Xeriscape Ordinance: Should the Captiollmprovement District (ClD) determine that Xeriscape would be of significant I. benefit as a water conservation measure relative to the cost of implementation, the CID is required to adopt a Xeriscape landscape ordinance meeting the requirement of Section 373.185(2)(a)-(f), F.S. In the event that such a Xeriscape ordinance is proposed for adoption, the permit applicant shall submit the draft ordinance to the District for determination of compliance with Section 373.185(2)(a)-(f). C: Ultra-Low Volume Plumbing Fixture Ordinance: The Collier County Building Code Department has adopted ultra-low volume plumbing standards, such as those stipulated in the SFWMD Water Conservation Plan Development Guidelines. These standards codify the 1994 Southern Building Code Congress International Standards and require a maximum of 1.6 gallons per flush and 2.5 gallons per minute for shower heads. D: Water Conservation Rate Structure: The CID has adopted a rate structure to encourage conservation. The rate structure is based on customer class with tiers at 10,000 gallons per month for single family residential and 6,000 gpm for multifamily residential, hotel, commercial, and RV. In addition, during water restriction periods imposed by Collier County in conjunction with the District, the CID will impose water restriction surcharges in order to promote additional levels of water conservation. The water restriction surcharge will range from 15 to 40 percent, depending on the imposed water shortage phase. EXHIBIT 16 ... .' '~I E: Leak Detection Program: The C1D has implemented a routine leak detection program which has facilitated the reduction of unaccounted-for water losses. The leak detection program involves pressure testing of ! , isolated segments of the entire system and routine pressure testing of transmission lines. All ". segments of distribution mains found to lack integrity are replaced. All new water mains are pressure tested subsequent to installation. Leaks detected within the system are repaired as .... qUickly as possible . ;.",.J F: Landscape Irrigation Conservation Measuring: i.Requirement for residents to connect to the central irrigation system owned and operated by the CID r .1 '-'.! ii. Prohibition of installation of domestic irrigation wells iii. Requirement for rain sensors for each customer .,1 T iv.Use of an escalating rate structure v. Encouragement of use of native plant species vi.lmplementation of a leak detection/water audit program vii.lnclusion of water conservation educational material with billings G: Water Conservation Education Program: The C1D has traditionally considered public dissemination of information as an integral part of its community responsibility. The CID periodically mails postcard type water conservation information to each of its customers H: Reclaimed Water: Wastewater collection and treatment services are available within the CID area. The CID is looking for customers in the area, particularly the adjacent golf course, which has a long duration permit. Once the current irrigation permits in the area, expire they will be required as part of the renewal process to obtain reuse water from the C1D. Infra-structure will be improved to accommodate the new users, however, current funding is being used to construct the RO component of the utility expansion. EXHIBIT 16 1 .' lo', , f -jo 1,... ~. r Requirement by Limiting Condition Report App No: 080902-11 Expiration 10-MAR-30 Permit No: 11-00148-W Date: Project Name: GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY Issued Date: Limiting Condition No: 17 Limiting Condition Code: WUSTD021-8 Facility Name Requirement Name Due Date Start Date End Date Col Freq Sub Freq WELL -GG-1 Calibration Report for Well GG-1 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years WELL -GG-3 Calibration Report for Well GG-3 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years WELL -GG-4 Calibration Report for Well GG-4 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years WELL -GG-5 Calibration Report for Well GG-5 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years WELL -GG-8 Calibration Report for Well GG-8 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years WELL -GG-9A Calibration Report for Well GG-9A 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years WELL -GG-10 Calibration Report for Well GG-10 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years WELL -GG-11 Calibration Report for Well GG-11 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years WELL -GG-12 Calibration Report for Well GG-12 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years WELL -GG-13 Calibration Report for Well GG-13 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years WELL -GG-2A Pump Calibration Report for Well GG30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years 2A WELL -GG-14 Pump Calibration Report for Well GG30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years 14 Limiting Condition No: 18 Limiting Condition Code: WUSTD022-1 Facility Name Requirement Name Due Date Start Date End Date Col Freq Sub Freq WELL -GG-1 Monthly Withdrawal for Well GG-1 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly m >< =r_. 0 r-+ WELL -GG-3 WELL -GG-4 WELL -GG-5 WELL -GG-8 Monthly Withdrawal for Well GG-3 Monthly Withdrawal for Well GG-4 Monthly Withdrawal for Well GG-5 Monthly Withdrawal for Well GG-8 30-JUN-10 30-JUN-10 30-JUN-10 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 28-FEB-30 28-FEB-30 28-FEB-30 Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly Z 0 WELL -GG-9A WELL -GG-10 Monthly Withdrawal for Well GG-9A Monthly Withdrawal for Well GG-10 30-JUN-10 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 28-FEB-30 Monthly Monthly Quarterly Quarterly WELL -GG-11 Monthly Withdrawal for Well GG-11 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly ~ -......I WELL -GG-12 WELL -GG-13 Monthly Withdrawal for Well GG-12 Monthly Withdrawal for Well GG-13 30-JUN-10 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 28-FEB-30 Monthly Monthly Quarterly Quarterly WELL -GG-14 Water Use Report for Well GG-14 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly Page 1 of 3 --, ... "_I •. ':',i 'r7 ..1 ..::. Requirement by Limiting Condition Report Facility Name Requirement Name Due Date Start Date End Date Col Freq Sub Freq WELL -GG-2A Water Use Report for Well GG-2A 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly Limiting Condition No: 20 Limiting Condition Code: WUPWS003-1 Facility Name Requirement Name Due Date Start Date End Date Col Freq Sub Freq PERMIT Unaccounted for Water Loss Report 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Yearly Yearly Limiting Condition No: 22 Limiting Condition Code: WUPWS005-1 Facility Name Requirement Name Due Date Start Date End Date Col Freq Sub Freq PERMIT Long Term Water Supply Plan for 30-APR-11 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 One time Only One time Only GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY Limiting Condition No: 26 Limiting Condition Code: WUWCOO4-1 Facility Name Requirement Name Due Date Start Date End Date Col Freq Sub Freq WELL -GG-14 Well Construction/Repair/Abandonment 31-0CT-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 One time Only One time Only Report for Well GG-14 WELL -GG-13 Table "A" for Well GG-13 31-0CT-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 One time Only One time Only WELL -GG-12 Table "A" for Well GG-12 31-0CT-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 One time Only One time Only Limiting Condition No: 27 Limiting Condition Code: WUSATOO1-4 Facility Name Requirement Name Due Date Start Date End Date Col Freq Sub Freq WELL -MW-A Chloride from well MW-A 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly WELL -MW-A Specific conductance from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly MW-A m >< ::::J_. 0 ~ WELL -MW-A WELL -MW-B WELL -MW-B Water level from well MW-A Chloride from well MW-B Specific conductance from well 30-JUN-10 30-JUN-10 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 28-FEB-30 28-FEB-30 Monthly Monthly Monthly Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly Z 0 WELL -MW-B MW-B Water level from well MW-B 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly ..-\0. WELL -MW-C Chloride from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly -J MW-C WELL -MW-C Specific conductance from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly MW-C Page 2 of 3 : i t ~ :i r... ~ ... ~ T;_ _ Requirement by Limiting Condition Report Facility Name Requirement Name Due Date Start Date End Date Col Freq Sub Freq WELL -MW-C Water level from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly MW-C WELL -MW-D Chloride from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly MW-D WELL -MW-D Specific conductance from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly MW-D WELL -MW-D Water level from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly MW-D WELL -MW-E Chloride from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly MW-E WELL -MW-E Specific conductance from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly MW-E WELL -MW-E Water level from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly MW-E WELL -MW-F Chloride from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly MW-F WELL -MW-F Specific conductance from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly MW-F WELL -MW-F Water level from well 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly MW-F WELL-MW-G Ground Water Level from Well MW-G 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly WELL -MW-G Specific Conductance from Well MW30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly G WELL -MW-G Chloride from Well MW-G 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly WELL -GG-12 Specific Conductance for Well GG-12 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly m WELL -GG-12 Chloride for Well GG-12 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly >< ::J_. WELL -GG-13 WELL -GG-13 Specific Conductance for Well GG-13 Chloride for Well GG-13 30-JUN-10 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 28-FEB-30 Monthly Monthly Quarterly Quarterly rr WELL -GG-14 Chloride for Well GG-14 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly ~ Z WELL -GG-14 Specific Conductance for Well GG-14 30-JUN-10 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Monthly Quarterly 0 Limiting Condition No: 28 Limiting Condition Code: WUPWSOO8-2 ~ Facility Name Requirement Name Due Date Start Date End Date Col Freq Sub Freq ~ PERMIT Five year permit compliance report for 31-MAR-15 01-APR-10 28-FEB-30 Every Five Years Every Five Years long term permits for GOLDEN GATE WATERT Page 3 of 3 STAFF REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST GOLDEN GATE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY Application No: 080902-11 Permit No: 11-00148-W INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION X Craig Boomgaard, P.G. X C. Tears X Permittee -Florida Governmental Utility Authority X P. McGary X Agent -Arcadis X Permit File X S. Korf X WU Compliance -T. Schwetje 'J -I ~I :1 Exhibit No: 18 TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR ACQUISITION OF FGUA WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS IN GOLDEN GATE C.1 FGUA FY 2017-2021 Totals Percent Revenue Totals Percent Expenditures Charges for Services 7,720,271$ 97.19%General & Administrative 548,584$ 6.91% Capacity Impact Fees 3,475 0.04%Operations and Management 2,640,021 33.24% Special Assessment Revenue - 0.00%Professional Services & Special Projects 153,982 1.94% Miscellaneous Revenue 219,439 2.76%Debt Service & Transfers 3,960,933 49.87% Non-Operating Revenues (Exps) - 0.00%Contribution to Fund Balance 639,665 8.05% Total Revenues 7,943,185$ 100.00%Total Expenditures 7,943,185$ 100.00% Totals Percent Totals Percent A403-101582- Debt Service Reserve Series 2010 632,196$ 100.00%Unrestricted Cash 4,915,918$ 81.70% Total Reserves 632,196$ 100.00%A403-101161- Rate Stabilization Reserve 1,101,419 18.30% Total Unrestricted Cash Balances 6,017,336$ 100.00% Reserves As of July 31, 2016 Golden Gate System Graphs REVENUES EXPENDITURES Unrestricted Cash Balances As of July 31, 2016 Charges for Services 97.19% Capacity Impact Fees 0.04% Special Assessment Revenue 0.00% Miscellaneous Revenue 2.76% Non-Operating Revenues (Exps) 0.04% Golden Gate Revenue FY 2017 General & Administrative 6.91% Operations and Management 33.24% Professional Services & Special Projects 1.94% Debt Service & Transfers 49.87% Contribution to Fund Balance 8.05% Golden Gate Expenditures FY 2017 FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY GOLDEN GATE SUMMARY Operating Forecast 2015 2016 2016 2017 Actual Budget Projected Adopted OPERATING REVENUES Charges for Water Services 4,089,886$ 4,040,132$ 4,104,696$ 4,198,119$ Charges for Wastewater Services 3,434,662 3,411,228 3,453,090 3,522,152 Capacity Impact Fees 53,247 3,475 32,193 3,475 Special Assessment Revenue - - - - Miscellaneous Revenue 223,140 210,823 233,598 219,439 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 7,800,935$ 7,665,658$ 7,823,577$ 7,943,185$ OPERATING EXPENDITURES General & Administrative 404,658$ 587,218$ 360,855$ 548,584$ Operating and Management 2,514,351 2,553,150 2,572,628 2,640,021 Professional Services 46,024 76,381 61,151 72,915 Special Projects 4,388 114,534 118,278 81,067 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES 2,969,421$ 3,331,283$ 3,112,912$ 3,342,587$ NET OPERATING REVENUE 4,831,513$ 4,334,375$ 4,710,665$ 4,600,598$ NON-OPERATING REVENUES Interest Income 884$ -$ 10,725$ -$ Contributions 9,551 - - - Miscellaneous Non-Operating Revenues 435 - 6,261 - TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES 10,870$ -$ 16,986$ -$ SURPLUS (DEFICIT) BEFORE TRANSFERS 4,842,383$ 4,334,375$ 4,727,651$ 4,600,598$ DEBT SERVICE Debt Service (Sr)(2,679,265)$ (2,522,612)$ (2,522,613)$ (2,520,164)$ Build America Bond Subsidies (BABS)- - - - Debt Service (Subordinate)(227,771) (236,477) (236,477) (286,001) TOTAL DEBT SERVICE (2,907,035)$ (2,759,089)$ (2,759,090)$ (2,806,165)$ OTHER TRANSFERS IN (OUT) Renewal & Replacement (367,105)$ (376,691)$ (383,717)$ (389,569)$ Operating Capital Assets/Projects (124,053) (527,805) (527,805) (711,724) Water & Wastewater Capacity (53,247) (3,475) (32,193) (3,475) Interest Earned on Restricted Accounts (413) - (4,735) - Capital Assets (i.e. Contributions)(9,551) - - - Rate Stabilization (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) TOTAL OTHER TRANSFERS IN (OUT)(604,368)$ (957,971)$ (998,450)$ (1,154,768)$ Increase (decrease) in net position 1,330,979$ 617,315$ 970,111$ 639,665$ Net Position, Unrestricted, beginning of year 4,519,444$ 5,850,423$ 5,850,423$ 6,820,534$ Net Position, Unrestricted, end of year 5,850,423$ 6,467,738$ 6,820,534$ 7,460,199$ Bond Requirements Test 1: Debt Service Coverage Req. 1.10 1.77 1.70 1.84 1.80 (Total Rev- Op Exp) / Debt Svc Test 2: Debt Service Coverage Req. 1.00 1.44 1.37 1.48 1.42 (Total Rev - Op Exp) / (Debt Svc + Required R&R (5% Revs)) FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY GOLDEN GATE DETAIL Operating Forecast 2015 2016 2016 2017 Actual Budget Projected Adopted OPERATING REVENUES F H J K 4030 343501 1 UNBILLED WATER REVENUE 79,186$ 11,187$ 42,936$ 43,794$ 4030 343502 1 UNBILLED WASTEWATER REVENUE 63,255 10,170 34,704 35,398 4030 343601 1 WATER REVENUE 4,000,209 4,019,942 4,050,128 4,142,460 4030 343602 1 WASTEWATER REVENUE 3,371,407 3,401,058 3,418,386 3,486,754 4030 343603 1 FIRE LINE REVENUE 10,490 9,003 11,632 11,865 4030 363201 1 WATER IMPACT FEES 41,468 1,950 28,180 1,950 4030 363202 1 WW IMPACT FEES 11,779 1,525 4,013 1,525 4030 343606 1 LATE FEES 161,414 150,609 156,385 156,385 4030 343608 1 OPUS MISCELLANEOUS FEES 33,808 34,376 44,790 45,686 4030 343612 1 CONNECT/RECONNECT FEE 12,843 12,370 11,415 11,643 4030 343614 1 METER SET FEES 7,054 6,045 13,068 250 4030 343615 1 INSPECTION FEES 1,941 1,847 250 255 4030 343616 1 PLAN REVIEW/LOA FEES 2,150 2,085 4,470 2,000 4030 343619 1 GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 3,820 3,377 3,220 3,220 4030 344000 1 CSA RECORDING FEES 112 114 - - TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 7,800,935$ 7,665,658$ 7,823,577$ 7,943,185$ OPERATING EXPENDITURES General & Administrative 40311010 519901 1 INDIRECT COSTS-BOARD EXPENSES 20,059$ 24,395$ 26,521$ 27,065$ 40311010 519904 1 GENERAL FUND TXFR 7,296 7,500 7,533 7,800 40311010 534009 1 BANKING SERVICES 20,131 21,480 17,696 18,227 40311010 534010 1 BANK FEE EARNINGS ALLOWANCE (75) (70) (295) (304) 40311010 534043 1 MERCHANT SERVICES (CC PROC) 32,266 33,120 34,666 35,706 40311010 534044 1 LOCKBOX SERVICES 3,460 3,533 3,889 4,006 40311010 535010 1 COLLECTION AGENCY FEES 1,206 1,288 1,452 1,496 40311010 545001 1 PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE 26,368 26,819 24,884 28,891 40311010 547002 1 COPYING CHARGES - 125 60 62 40311010 548002 1 LEGAL ADS 2,409 1,553 413 426 40311010 549003 1 BAD DEBT EXPENSES 39,329 142,091 39,209 152,584 40311010 549005 1 REGULATORY & PERMIT FEES 251,983 317,630 204,787 272,584 40311010 549006 1 CASH OVERAGE/SHORTAGE 2 3 1 1 40311010 549008 1 CONTINGENCIES - 7,210 - - 40311010 549013 1 LATE FEES PENALTIES FINES 225 386 39 40 40311010 554001 1 SUBSCRIPTIONS & DUES - 155 - - TOTAL GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE 404,658$ 587,218$ 360,855$ 548,584$ Operating and Management 40312021 534001 1 OPERATIONS & MAINT SERVICES 1,670,017$ 1,720,118$ 1,718,808$ 1,754,908$ 40312021 534002 1 ADDITIONAL O&M SERVICES 41,292 48,874 35,110 36,164 40312021 534003 1 CUSTOMER SVC & BILLING 240,452 247,666 244,482 250,462 40312021 534004 1 ADDITIONAL CUST SVC & BILLING - 858 1,586 1,634 40312021 534005 1 MANAGEMENT CONTRACT 156,542 161,238 160,089 164,892 40312021 534006 1 INSPECTION SERVICES 1,941 2,367 458 255 40312021 534011 1 PLAN REVIEW/LOA SERVICES 2,150 6,510 8,483 2,000 40312021 534036 1 SECURITY MONITORING FEE 1,932 1,874 1,972 2,031 40312021 536003 1 METER EXPENSES 6,727 7,232 6,784 238 40312021 536044 1 METER SERVICE & PERFORMANCE - - - 17,900 40312021 543005 1 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 350,704 304,044 342,236 369,836 40312021 544001 1 BUILDING & LAND RENTAL 42,535 43,834 43,969 33,560 40312021 546001 1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 59 148 10 10 40312021 552005 1 ARC-GIS - 8,387 8,641 6,131 Total Operating and Management 2,514,351$ 2,553,150$ 2,572,628$ 2,640,021$ Professional Services 40314040 519902 1 INDIRECT COSTS-PROF SERVICES 33,080$ 57,118$ 41,167$ 52,332$ 40314040 534007 1 ENGINEERING SERVICES - 5,150 - - 40314040 534040 1 LEGAL SERVICES-GENERAL COUNSEL 3,700 3,694 14,735 15,177 40314040 534041 1 LEGAL SERVICES-UTILITY COUNSEL - 690 2,825 2,910 40314040 534042 1 LEGAL SERVICES-LITIGATION CONS 9,244 9,729 2,424 2,496 Total Professional Services 46,024$ 76,381$ 61,151$ 72,915$ Special Projects 40314060 519903 1 INDIRECT COSTS-SPEC PROJ 2,062$ 5,558$ 5,558$ 7,050$ 40314060 534000 1 ARC-GIS MANAGEMENT - 8,025 8,025 8,188 40314060 534012 1 RFQ FOR OPERATIONS & BILLING - 37,039 40,783 - FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY GOLDEN GATE DETAIL Operating Forecast 2015 2016 2016 2017 Actual Budget Projected Adopted 40314060 534015 1 PERFORMANCE AUDIT -CUST BILLNG - 3,204 3,204 3,300 40314060 534017 1 CUSTOMER FEASIBILITY STUDY - 15,450 15,450 15,914 40314060 534029 1 RATE STUDIES 2,283 29,300 29,300 16,391 40314060 534039 1 MANDITORY WWC PROGRAM - 15,914 15,914 30,179 40314060 548001 1 CUSTOMER INFO & OUTREACH 43 44 44 45 Total Special Projects 4,388$ 114,534$ 118,278$ 81,067$ TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES 2,969,421$ 3,331,283$ 3,112,912$ 3,342,587$ NET OPERATING REVENUE 4,831,513$ 4,334,375$ 4,710,665$ 4,600,598$ NON-OPERATING REVENUES INTEREST 884$ -$ 10,725$ -$ 4032 365000 1 SALE OF SURPLUS MATERIAL/SCRAP 435 - 6,261 - 4032 389901 1 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS 9,551 - - - TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES 10,870$ -$ 16,986$ -$ TRANSFERS IN (OUT) Series 2005 Bond 40332005 572000 1 INTEREST (436,861)$ -$ -$ -$ Series 2010 Bond 40332010 572000 1 INTEREST (347,325) (347,325) (347,325) (347,325) Series 2012 Bond 40332012 571000 1 PRINCIPAL (956,250) (998,750) (998,750) (1,036,250) 40332012 572000 1 INTEREST (705,325) (667,075) (667,075) (627,126) Series 2015 Bond 40332015 572000 1 INTEREST (233,504) (509,462) (509,463) (509,463) State Revolving Fund Wastewater Loan 40333005 571000 1 PRINCIPAL (79,603) (81,977) (81,977) (84,423) 40333005 572000 1 INTEREST (24,872) (22,498) (22,498) (20,052) State Revolving Fund Drinking Water Loan 40333010 571000 1 PRINCIPAL (94,039) (96,735) (96,735) (99,509) 40333010 572000 1 INTEREST (29,257) (26,561) (26,561) (23,787) Energy Program Loan 40333444 571000 1 PRINCIPAL - - (6,000) 40333444 572000 1 INTEREST - (8,706) (8,706) (52,230) Other Required Transfers 40334100 581001 1 RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT (367,105) (376,691) (383,717) (389,569) 4030 363201 1 WATER IMPACT FEES (41,468) (1,950) (28,180) (1,950) 4030 363202 1 WW IMPACT FEES (11,779) (1,525) (4,013) (1,525) 4032 389901 1 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS (9,551) - - - 40334100 581100 1 RATE STABILIZATION TXFR (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) 40334100 581103 1 OTHER CAP PROJ TXFR (124,053) (527,805) (527,805) (711,724) INTEREST (413) - (4,735) - TOTAL TRANSFERS IN (OUT)(3,511,404)$ (3,717,060)$ (3,757,540)$ (3,960,933)$ Increase (decrease) in net position 1,330,979$ 617,315$ 970,111$ 639,665$ Net Position, Unrestricted, beginning of year 4,519,444$ 5,850,423$ 5,850,423$ 6,820,534$ Net Position, Unrestricted, end of year 5,850,423$ 6,467,738$ 6,820,534$ 7,460,199$ BUDGET SUMMARY - GOLDEN GATE Total Project Needs 10,710,906$ FUNDED CIP FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Total GGP01 Collection System Improvements 242,191$ 333,555$ 365,190$ 263,070$ 210,900$ 1,414,906$ GGP02 Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) Improvements 193,196 132,090 100,455 114,330 65,490 605,561 GGP03 Water Treatment Facility (WTF) Improvements 170,369 109,890 172,050 277,500 66,600 796,409 GGP04 Distribution System Improvements 15,812 13,320 59,940 82,140 65,490 236,702 GGP05 Water Meter Replacement 28,419 28,329 28,329 28,329 28,329 141,737 GGP07 WWTP No. 1 Rehab 1,102,054 - - - - 1,102,054 GGP08 WTP Install RO 1,280,552 - - - - 1,280,552 GGP09 Emergency Water Supply Interconnect - 505,050 111,000 - - 616,050 GGP10 WTP Capacity Increase (Wells & Treatment Capacity)- - - 55,500 - 55,500 Total Funded Projects 3,032,593$ 1,122,234$ 836,964$ 820,869$ 436,809$ 6,249,471$ 40370105 Available R&R Funds 1,881,322$ 399,069$ 402,399$ 413,499$ 274,749$ 3,371,040$ 40370103 Additional From Op Revenue 711,764 429,015 434,565 407,370 162,060 2,144,774 40372005 2005 Bonds - - - - - - 40372010 2010 Bonds 105,451 - - - - 105,451 40370141 Water Impact Fees 334,057 294,150 - - - 628,207 40370145 Wastewater Impact Fees - - - - - - Total Sources 3,032,593$ 1,122,234$ 836,964$ 820,869$ 436,809$ 6,249,471$ Unfunded Project Needs 4,461,435$ Project Name:Collection System Improvements Project No.: System:Golden Gate County: Category:Sewer (S) 2. JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT: 3. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS Engineering & Design - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - Construction 217,500 300,500 329,000 237,000 190,000 1,274,000 Contingency - - - - - - Inspection 5%10,875 15,025 16,450 11,850 9,500 63,700 Legal 1%2,175 3,005 3,290 2,370 1,900 12,740 CIP Management 11,641 15,025 16,450 11,850 9,500 64,466 242,191 333,555 365,190 263,070 210,900 1,414,906 CHECK Collection System Improvements242,191 333,555 365,190 263,070 210,900 4. FUNDING SOURCE: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS 33,406 119,880 111,000 210,900 133,200 608,386 Additional From Op. Revenue 208,786 213,675 254,190 52,170 77,700 806,521 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 242,191 333,555 365,190 263,070 210,900 1,414,906 5. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT CREATED BY PROJECT: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Operator Costs: Electric Power: Other: Other: Total Operating Costs: 1. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION These funds may be used to reduce I&I,repair or upgrade lift stations,rehabilitate manholes,replace force mains,gravity mains and laterals,and repair collection system breaks.Other colelction system improvement projects may be done as necessary. This project is necessary to ensure the reliability and efficiency of the wastewater collection system. TOTALS Renewal & Replacement 2005 Bonds Water Capacity Wastewater Capacity 2010 Bonds TOTALS Energy Project Loan FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FY 2017 - FY 2022 PROJECT REQUEST FORM GGP01 Collier Project Name:Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) Improvements Project No.: System:Golden Gate County: Category:Sewer (S) 2. JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT: 3. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS Engineering & Design - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - Construction 173,500 119,000 90,500 103,000 59,000 545,000 Contingency - - - - - - Inspection 5%8,675 5,950 4,525 5,150 2,950 27,250 Legal 1%1,735 1,190 905 1,030 590 5,450 CIP Management 9,286 5,950 4,525 5,150 2,950 27,861 193,196 132,090 100,455 114,330 65,490 605,561 CHECK Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) Improvements193,196 132,090 100,455 114,330 4. FUNDING SOURCE: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS 38,973 42,180 75,480 75,480 53,280 285,393 Additional From Op. Revenue 154,223 89,910 24,975 38,850 12,210 320,168 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 193,196 132,090 100,455 114,330 65,490 605,561 5. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT CREATED BY PROJECT: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Operator Costs: Electric Power: Other: Other: Total Operating Costs: 1. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION These funds may be used for necessary upgrades and improvements to the wastewater treatment facilities.Facility improvements may include process modifications,equipment repairs and replacement,and facility upgrades.Other improvements may be done as necessary. This project is necessary to ensure plant modifications,upgrades,improvements and repair/replacement of facility equipment is funded in order to maintain plant efficiency, reliability, regulatory compliance, effluent quality and plant safety. TOTALS Renewal & Replacement 2005 Bonds Water Capacity Wastewater Capacity 2010 Bonds TOTALS Energy Project Loan FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FY 2017 - FY 2021 PROJECT REQUEST FORM GGP02 Collier Project Name:Water Treatment Facility (WTF) Improvements Project No.: System:Golden Gate County: Category:Water (W) 2. JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT: 3. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS Engineering & Design - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - Construction 153,000 99,000 155,000 250,000 60,000 717,000 Contingency - - - - - - Inspection 5%7,650 4,950 7,750 12,500 3,000 35,850 Legal 1%1,530 990 1,550 2,500 600 7,170 CIP Management 8,189 4,950 7,750 12,500 3,000 36,389 170,369 109,890 172,050 277,500 66,600 796,409 CHECK Water Treatment Facility (WTF) Improvements170,369 109,890 172,050 277,500 4. FUNDING SOURCE: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS 61,244 48,840 49,950 49,950 11,100 221,084 Additional From Op. Revenue 109,125 61,050 122,100 227,550 55,500 575,325 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 170,369 109,890 172,050 277,500 66,600 796,409 5. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT CREATED BY PROJECT: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Operator Costs: Electric Power: Other: Other: Total Operating Costs: 1. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION These funds may be used for necessary upgrades and improvements to the water treatment facilities.Facility improvements may include process modifications,equipment repairs and replacement and facility upgrades.Other improvements may be done as necessary. This project is necessary to ensure modifications,upgrades,improvements and repair/replacement of facility equipment is funded in order to maintain plant efficiency, reliability, regulatory compliance, water quality and plant safety. TOTALS Renewal & Replacement 2005 Bonds Water Capacity Wastewater Capacity 2010 Bonds TOTALS Energy Project Loan FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FY 2017 - FY 2021 PROJECT REQUEST FORM GGP03 Collier Project Name:Distribution System Improvements Project No.: System:Golden Gate County: Category:Water (W) 2. JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT: 3. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS Engineering & Design - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - Construction 14,200 12,000 54,000 74,000 59,000 213,200 Contingency - - - - - - Inspection 5%710 600 2,700 3,700 2,950 10,660 Legal 1%142 120 540 740 590 2,132 CIP Management 760 600 2,700 3,700 2,950 10,710 15,812 13,320 59,940 82,140 65,490 236,702 CHECK Distribution System Improvements15,812 13,320 59,940 82,140 4. FUNDING SOURCE: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS 4,454 4,440 26,640 48,840 48,840 133,214 Additional From Op. Revenue 11,358 8,880 33,300 33,300 16,650 103,488 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15,812 13,320 59,940 82,140 65,490 236,702 5. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT CREATED BY PROJECT: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Operator Costs: Electric Power: Other: Other: Total Operating Costs: 1. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION These funds may be used to for various water distribution improvements including repair or replacement of fire hydrants, valves and water mains.These funds may also be used to loop dead end mains or to extend water mains to portions of the service area not currently served. Other distributions system improvement projects may be done as necessary. This project is necessary to ensure the reliability and efficiency of the water distribution system. TOTALS Renewal & Replacement 2005 Bonds Water Capacity Wastewater Capacity 2010 Bonds TOTALS Energy Project Loan FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FY 2017 - FY 2021 PROJECT REQUEST FORM GGP04 Collier Project Name:Water Meter Replacement Project No.: System:Golden Gate County: Category:Water (W) 2. JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT: 3. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS Engineering & Design - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - Construction 25,522 25,522 25,522 25,522 25,522 127,610 Contingency - - - - - - Inspection 5%1,276 1,276 1,276 1,276 1,276 6,381 Legal 1%255 255 255 255 255 1,276 CIP Management 1,366 1,276 1,276 1,276 1,276 6,470 28,419 28,329 28,329 28,329 28,329 141,737 CHECK Water Meter Replacement28,419 28,329 28,329 28,329 4. FUNDING SOURCE: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS 28,419 28,329 28,329 28,329 28,329 141,737 Additional From Op. Revenue - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28,419 28,329 28,329 28,329 28,329 141,737 5. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT CREATED BY PROJECT: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Operator Costs: Electric Power: Other: Other: Total Operating Costs: 1. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION The FGUA has instituted a program by which aged meters are replaced at a frequency depending on the age and volume through the meter. The 5/8" and 3/4" meters are replaced at ten years of age. Larger meters are replaced more frequently. To maintain accurate water usage data for appropriate customer billing and reporting to the water management districts. TOTALS Renewal & Replacement 2005 Bonds Water Capacity Wastewater Capacity 2010 Bonds TOTALS Energy Project Loan FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FY 2017 - FY 2021 PROJECT REQUEST FORM GGP05 Collier Project Name:WWTP No. 1 Rehabilitation Project No.: System:Golden Gate County: Category:Sewer (S) 2. JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT: 3. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS Engineering & Design - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - Construction 989,700 - - - - 989,700 Contingency - - - - - - Inspection 5%49,485 - - - - 49,485 Legal 1%9,897 - - - - 9,897 CIP Management 52,972 - - - - 52,972 1,102,054 - - - - 1,102,054 CHECK Water Meter Replacement28,419 28,329 28,329 28,329 4. FUNDING SOURCE: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS 768,331 - - - - 768,331 Additional From Op. Revenue 228,272 - - - - 228,272 - - - - - - 105,451 - - - - 105,451 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,102,054 - - - - 1,102,054 5. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT CREATED BY PROJECT: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Operator Costs: Electric Power: Other: Other: Total Operating Costs: 1. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION Rehabilitate plant #1.The rehabilitation will include improvements to aeration,influent structure,clarifiers,clarifier launder, rubber, skimmer flap, walkways and structures, steall blast cleaning and replacment, and complete cleaning of the tank. The plant is showing signs of significant corrosion and structural failure may result.As part of the recent WWTP Operating Permit renewal,FDEP has included an Administrative Order stating that repairs to the rusted plant components be completed.In addition,rags and debris have accumulated in the surge tank due to lack of a functional influent structure. This debris must be removed from the system to prevent downstream equipment failure. TOTALS Renewal & Replacement 2005 Bonds 2010 Bonds Water Capacity Wastewater Capacity TOTALS Energy Project Loan FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FY 2017 - FY 2021 PROJECT REQUEST FORM GGP07 Collier Project Name:WTP Install RO Project No.: System:Golden Gate County: Category:Water (W) 2. JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT: 3. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS Engineering & Design 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Permits - - - - - - Construction 1,000,000 - - - - 1,000,000 Contingency - - - - - - Inspection 5%57,500 - - - - 57,500 Legal 1%11,500 - - - - 11,500 CIP Management 61,552 - - - - 61,552 1,280,552 - - - - 1,280,552 CHECK Water Meter Replacement28,419 28,329 28,329 28,329 4. FUNDING SOURCE: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS 946,495 - - - - 946,495 Additional From Op. Revenue - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 334,057 - - - - 334,057 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,280,552 - - - - 1,280,552 5. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT CREATED BY PROJECT: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Operator Costs: Electric Power: Other: Other: Total Operating Costs: 1. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION This project will enlarge the existing RO train to produce finished water with a capacity that replaces the existing lime softening treatment unit, which will be decommissioned. Thee funds are necessary for upgrades and improvements to the water treatment facility.The existing lime softening unit will be replaced with an RO system to greatly improve water quality.Increasing the treatment capacity of the existing RO system is more cost effective than rehabilitating the lime softening unit. TOTALS Renewal & Replacement 2005 Bonds 2010 Bonds Water Capacity Wastewater Capacity TOTALS Energy Project Loan FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FY 2017 - FY 2021 PROJECT REQUEST FORM GGP08 Collier Project Name:Water Treatment Plant Capacity (incl Wells) Project No.: System:Golden Gate County: Category:Water (W) 2. JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT: 3. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS Engineering & Design - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - Construction - 455,000 100,000 - - 555,000 Contingency - - - - - - Inspection 5%- 22,750 5,000 - - 27,750 Legal 1%- 4,550 1,000 - - 5,550 CIP Management - 22,750 5,000 - - 27,750 - 505,050 111,000 - - 616,050 CHECK Water Meter Replacement28,419 28,329 28,329 28,329 4. FUNDING SOURCE: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS - 155,400 111,000 - - 266,400 Additional From Op. Revenue - 55,500 - - - 55,500 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 294,150 - - - 294,150 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 505,050 111,000 - - 616,050 5. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT CREATED BY PROJECT: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Renewal & Replacement FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FY 2017 - FY 2021 PROJECT REQUEST FORM GGP09 Collier 1. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION These funds may be used to design, permit and construct additional raw water wells to supply the Golden Gate WTP. This project is necessary to ensure adequate raw water supply which may be required if the WTP is expanded or TUA is converted to RO. TOTALS Total Operating Costs: 2005 Bonds 2010 Bonds Water Capacity Wastewater Capacity Energy Project Loan TOTALS Operator Costs: Electric Power: Other: Other: Project Name:Emergency Water Interconnect Project No.: System:Golden Gate County: Category:Water (W) 2. JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT: 3. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS Engineering & Design - - - - - - Permits - - - - - - Construction - - - 50,000 - 50,000 Contingency - - - - - - Inspection 5%- - - 2,500 - 2,500 Legal 1%- - - 500 - 500 CIP Management - - - 2,500 - 2,500 - - - 55,500 - 55,500 CHECK Water Meter Replacement28,419 28,329 28,329 28,329 4. FUNDING SOURCE: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS - - - - - - Additional From Op. Revenue - - - 55,500 - 55,500 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 55,500 - 55,500 5. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT CREATED BY PROJECT: FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTALS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Renewal & Replacement FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FY 2017 - FY 2021 PROJECT REQUEST FORM GGP10 Collier 1. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION These funds may be utilized to construct the upgrades necessary to utilize the City of Naples raw water interconnect without use of a portable pump. This project is necessary to provide a supplementary/backup source of raw water for use at the WTP.The City of Naples raw water transmission main is currently interconnected with the Golden Gate WTP but the interconnect requires a portable trailer mounted pump for utilization of the interconnect.This project provides for the necessary equipment /construction to utilize the interconnect without a portable trailer mounted pump. TOTALS Total Operating Costs: 2005 Bonds 2010 Bonds Water Capacity Wastewater Capacity Energy Project Loan TOTALS Operator Costs: Electric Power: Other: Other: GOLDEN GATE SYSTEM COMPENSATION AGREEMENT THIS COMPENSATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), is made and entered into as of this day of rUi , , 2011, by and between the Florida Govemmental Utility Authority, a legal entity and public body created by interlocal agreement pursuant to section 163.,01(7)(g), Florida Statutes (the "GUN'), and U.S. Water/Wade Trim, LLC (the "Contractor"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on or about October 8, 2008, the GUA and the Contractor entered into that certain General Terms Agreement for Utility Operations, Maintenance, Billing, and Customer Service (the "General Terms Agreement"), which outlines the terms and conditions under which the Contractor will provide Utility Services for certain GUA Systems; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the General Terms Agreement, the GUA and the Contractor must enter into a Compensation Agreement for each subsequently identified GUA System for which the Contractor is going to provide Utility Services pursuant to the terms outlined in the General Terms Agreement; and WHEREAS, the GUA desires to engage the Contractor to provide Utility Service in accordance with the General Terms Agreement for the Utility Facilities located in Collier County, Florida, known by the GUA as the Golden Gate System; and WHEREAS, the Contractor represents that it currently has, and will have throughout the term of this Compensation Agreement, the experience, resources and professional skill to provide the Utility Services required to operate and maintain the 1 of 43 Utility Facilities in the Golden Gate System, to timely and accurately bill for service provided and to maintain effective relationships with utility customers. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, representations and agreements contained herein, the parties to this Agreement do agree for themselves, their successors and assigns as follows: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. All capitalized words and terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the General Terms Agreement. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context hereof otherwise requires: "Agreement" shall mean this Compensation Agreement, including all appendices, and any amendments and supplements hereto that are executed and delivered in accordance with its terms. "Annual ERC Adjustment" shall mean the adjustment to be made to the Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee on an annual basis, which is calculated by multiplying the Per ERC Fee by the change in the number of ERC's compared to the previous year. "Annual Connection Adjustment" shall mean the adjustment to be made to the Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee on an annual basis, which is calculated by multiplying the Per Connection Fee by the change in the number of connections compared to the previous year. 0 2of43 "Commencement Date" shall mean that date the Contract commences providing utility services. "County" shall mean Collier County, Florida. "General Terms Agreement" shall mean that certain General Terms Agreement for Utility Operations, Maintenance, Billing, and Customer Service entered into by and between the GUA and the Contractor on or about October 8, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. "Golden Gate System" shall mean water and wastewater utility system owned by the GUA, which provides service to the areas depicted in Appendix A hereto, including any service territory expansions that may occur during the term of this Agreement. "Per Connection Fee" shall mean, generally, the amount of the Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee allocated to an individual Connection as follows: The Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee for fiscal year 2011-12 shall be converted into the Per Connection Fee by dividing the annual Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee by the actual number of Connections served within the Golden Gate System on June 30 of each year. "Per ERC Fee" shall mean, generally, the amount of the Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee allocated to an individual ERC as follows: The Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee for fiscal year 2011-12 shall be converted into the Per ERC Fee by dividing the annual Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee by the actual number of ERCs served within the Golden Gate System on June 30 of each year. 0 3 of 43 "Price Index" shall mean the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers for the U.S. City Average for all items less food and energy, as published monthly by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Price Index Change" shall mean the percentage change between the Price Index in effect as of each July 1 during the term of this Agreement as compared to the Price Index in effect as of July 1 of the prior year. "Transition Period" shall mean that period commencing on April 1, 2011 and ending on December 31, 2011 established for the purposes of carrying out those pre - commencement and post -commencement transition tasks and responsibilities outlined in Section 13 of this agreement. SECTION 2. CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION. (A) Words that indicate a singular number shall include the plural in each case and vice versa, and words that indicate a person shall include legal entities, firms and corporations. (B) The terms "herein," "hereunder," "hereby," "hereof," and any similar terms, shall refer to this Agreement; the term "heretofore" shall mean before the date of execution of this Agreement; and the term "hereafter' shall mean on or after the initial date of execution of this Agreement. (C) Words that reference only one gender shall include all genders. (D) This Agreement shall be construed as resulting from ongoing negotiation between the parties and no part of this Agreement shall be construed as the product of any one of the parties hereto. 4 of 43 SECTION 3. INCORPORATION. The Appendices hereto and each of the documents referred to therein are incorporated and made a part hereof in their entirety by reference. SECTION 4. SECTION HEADINGS. Any headings preceding the texts of the several Articles, Sections, Appendices, or Exhibits in this Agreement and any table of contents or marginal notes appended to copies hereof, shall be solely for the convenience of reference and shall neither constitute a part of this Agreement nor affect its meaning, construction or effect. SECTION 5. PROVISION OF UTILITY SERVICES. (A) Beginning on the Commencement Date, the Contractor shall provide all reporting, plans, policies, procedures, qualified supervision, labor, tools, vehicles, equipment, materials, and personnel necessary to perform the Basic Operation and Maintenance Service and Basic Billing and Customer Service, as provided in the General Terms Agreement, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, for the Golden Gate System. In accordance with the terms of the General Terms Agreement, the Contractor shall have use and control of the GUA Non -Fixed Assets and Inventory associated with the Golden Gate System for the sole purpose of providing the GUA Utility Services. (B) To fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, the Contractor shall provide staff at all Utility Facilities within the Golden Gate System in such number and for such duration as provided in the Staffing Plan, which is attached hereto as Appendix B and incorporated herein by reference, and so as to comply with Applicable Law, operating performance standards and Permits. 5 of 43 SECTION 6. REQUIRED PLAN SUBMISSIONS. (A) In accordance with Section 3.01 of the General Terms Agreement, by January 1 of each year the Contractor is required to submit an Annual Maintenance Plan for the next Fiscal Year to the GUA for approval. The Annual Maintenance Plan for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2011, shall be submitted by the Contractor to the GUA for approval no later than ninety (90) days prior to the Commencement Date. (B) In accordance with Section 3.01 of the General Terns Agreement, by January 1 of each year the Contractor is required to submit an annual Capital Improvement list for the next Fiscal Year to the GUA for approval. The initial Capital Improvement list for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2011, shall be submitted by the Contractor to the GUA for approval no later than forty-five (45) days prior to the Commencement Date. (C) In accordance with Section 3.01 of the General Terms Agreement, by January 1 of each year the Contractor is required to submit an annual list of all Major Renewal, Replacement or Repair Projects for the next Fiscal Year to the GUA for approval. The initial list of all Major Renewal, Replacement or Repair Projects for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 2011, shall be submitted by the Contractor to the GUA for approval no later than forty-five (45) days prior to the Commencement Date. SECTION 7. BASIC OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICE FEE. (A) Beginning October 1, 2011, the base annual fee for Basic Operation and Maintenance Services will be $1,656,242. Except as provided in Section 3.03(6)(3) of the General Terms Agreement, included in the Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee is the first seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500.00) per Event of the 6 of 43 Contractor's cost for any Repair, Renewal and Replacement. Additionally, for any 46 repair found to be required as a result of failure of Contractor to perform required predictive and preventive maintenance as set forth in system maintenance standards and schedules, the entire cost of such repair shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. The Contractor and the GUA agree to work cooperatively to develop and examine a revised pricing and performance approach to cost sharing of system repairs, which shall be brought to the GUA Board of Directors for consideration within ninety (90) days of the execution of this Agreement. (B) Commencing on October 1, 2012 and on each subsequent October 1 during the term of this Agreement, the Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee shall be adjusted as follows: (1) The Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee shall be adjusted by the Price Index Change determined on the preceding July 1; and (2) The Per ERC Fee shall then be calculated pursuant to the definition in Section 1, and then multiplied by the change in the actual number of ERCs being served in the Golden Gate System compared to the previous year. This calculation will result in the Annual ERC Adjustment, which is then added to or subtracted from the index -adjusted Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee calculated in (1) above. (C) The annual adjustment outlined above may result in an increase or decrease to the Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee depending on the Price Index Change and the annual change in the number of ERCs being served in the Golden Gate System. 0 7 of 43 SECTION 8. PAYMENT OF BASIC OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICE FEE. (A) The Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee shall be paid to the Contractor by the GUA in equal monthly installments not later than the thirtieth (30tH) day of the month following the month during which said services were performed. For the first month in which the Commencement Date occurs, the Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee shall be reduced by a proration based on the number of calendar days preceding the Commencement Date. (B) The GUA shall pay Contractor the Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee in a manner consistent with the Florida Prompt Payment Act. SECTION 9. ALLOCATION OF THE BASIC OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICE FEE. (A) In recognition of the synergies and economies of scale gained by the Contractor in the performance of services to the Golden Gate System together with the Lehigh Acres System and North Fort Myers System, the Contractor has allocated and shall continue to allocate all indirect costs and these savings on a rational basis among all three systems to ensure customers receive the appropriate share of benefits. (C) In the event that a change of scope of services occurs, the GUA and the Contractor shall negotiate and provide by written amendment hereto a commensurate adjustment in the Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee to be paid during the remainder of the term of the Compensation Agreement provided Contractor has not already been compensated therefore. 0 8 of 43 (D) if there is a Change in Law so as to cause the Contractor to incur additional cost, such increase or change shall be treated as a "change of scope of services" under this Agreement requiring adjustment of the Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee as provided in this Compensation Agreement. SECTION 10. BASIC BILLING AND CUSTOMER SERVICE FEE. (A) The Contractor agrees to provide Basic Billing and Customer Services for the Golden Gate System for the period of time between the Commencement Date and September 30, 2012 for the sum of $226,253.00. (B) Commencing on October 1, 2012 and on each subsequent October 1 during the term of this Agreement, the Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee in effect for the prior Fiscal Year shall be adjusted annually as follows: (1) The Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee shall be adjusted by the Price Index Change determined on the preceding July 1; and (2) The Per Connection Fee shall then be calculated pursuant to the definition in Section 1, and then multiplied by the change in the actual number of Connections being served in the Golden Gate System compared to the previous year. This calculation will result in the Annual Connection Adjustment, which is then added to or subtracted from the index -adjusted Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee calculated in (1) above. (C) The annual adjustment outlined above may result in an increase or decrease to the Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee depending on the Price Index Change and the annual change in the number of Connections being served in the Golden Gate System. 9 of 43 (D) The postage cost item within the Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee shall automatically increase in an amount equal to any additional cost to the Contractor caused by an increase in U.S. Postal Service rates over the rates that are effective as of the Commencement Date. SECTION 11. PAYMENT OF BASIC BILLING AND CUSTOMER SERVICE FEE. (A) The Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee shall be paid to the Contractor in equal monthly installments not later than the thirtieth (30th) day of the month following the month during which said services were performed. (B) The GUA shall pay Contractor the Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee in a manner consistent with the Florida Prompt Payment Act. SECTION 12. ADJUSTMENT TO THE BASIC BILLING AND CUSTOMER SERVICE FEE. In the event that a change of scope of services occurs, the GUA and the Contractor shall negotiate and provide by written amendment hereto a commensurate adjustment in the Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee to be paid during the remainder of the term of this Agreement. SECTION 13. TRANSITION PLAN. (A) To ensure an orderly and efficient transition of the Golden Gate System to the new contract operator, the Contractor and the GUA shall abide by the terms and conditions and schedule of activities set forth in the Transition Plan for the Transition Period, which is attached hereto as Appendix C and incorporated herein by reference (the "Transition Plan"). 0 10 of 43 (B) The GUA will assist the Contractor in gaining access to facilities, systems and information from the current contract operator as necessary to perform transition plan responsibilities. SECTION 14. TERM OF AGREEMENT. (A) The Initial Term of the contract shall begin on the Commencement Date and end on September 30, 2016. (B) Upon mutual agreement, the contract may be extended for an additional five-year term at the conclusion of the Initial Term. Upon the exercise of this option, the GUA and the Contractor will negotiate a mutually acceptable Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee and Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee for the next five- year period. The GUA shall provide no less than one hundred eighty (180) days written notice to Contractor of intent to renew or not. (C) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that before or during the Initial Term portions of the Utility Facilities may be transferred from GUA ownership to ownership by county or city governments during the term hereof. In such event, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that such successor local government shall have the option at its sole discretion to terminate this Agreement as it relates to Utility Facilities so transferred at any time upon one hundred eighty (180) days' written notice to the Contractor. The GUA acknowledges that Contractor is permitted to negotiate with such successor local government toward a continuation of services by Contractor on behalf of such successor local government upon transfer of the Utility Facilities. 11 of 43 SECTION 15. COMPLIANCE WITH REVENUE PROCEDURES. The Contractor and the GUA acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is intended to, and does comply in all material respects with the requirements of Section 141 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Code") and particularly Revenue Procedure 97-13, as such Revenue Procedure may be modified or superseded, from time to time (collectively, the "Revenue Procedure") as currently interpreted. If any provision of this Agreement should cause the Agreement not to comply with the requirements of the Code or the Revenue Procedure as interpreted from time to time, this Agreement shall be amended to comply with the Code and the Revenue Procedure. The Contractor and the GUA acknowledge and agree that, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement shall be amended by the parties in order to comply with any future legislative, regulatory or administrative changes to such provisions under the Code or the Revenue Procedure during the term of this Agreement. SECTION 16. ACCESS, AND PUBLIC RECORDS AUDITS. The Contractor shall maintain adequate records to justify all charges, expenses and costs incurred in estimating and performing the Utility Services for at least three (3) years from the production of a record. The GUA, the Systems Manager or their contracted representatives shall have access to such books, records and documents as required for the purpose of inspection or audit, during Normal Business Hours, and such books, records and documents shall be kept by Contractor at a place of business of the Contractor within the State of Florida. The Contractor shall be subject to an annual independent financial and performance audit on its performance and provision of the 0 12 of 43 Utility Services under this Agreement. Any such audit shall be undertaken by an auditor �ry or auditors selected and paid for by the GUA. All GUA records shall be maintained and retained in full compliance with the Florida Public Records Law. SECTION 17. INDEMNIFICATION. (A) In consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration provided between the parties, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by each party, each party shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold the other party and its officers, employees and agents harmless from and against any and all liabilities, claims, losses, and expenses, including attorney's fees and all reasonable costs of litigation and judgments arising out of any willful misconduct, negligent act, error, omission or infringement of a third -party patent, license or other intellectual property by that party, its subcontractors, agents or employees, arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement. The GUA's obligation to indemnify Contractor pursuant to this Section 17 is limited by the GUA's right to sovereign immunity, which right is expressly not waived by the GUA, and to the indemnification limitations provided in section 788.28, Florida Statutes. Any indemnification right of the Contractor is further limited to and payable solely from money of the GUA which is not derived from any enterprise fund of the GUA other than the Golden Gate System or otherwise in conflict with any financing documents relating to the bonds issued to finance the purchase or improvement of the Golden Gate System. (B) Each party acknowledges that the general conditions of any construction or subcontractor contract with an entity not a party to this Agreement shall include language, satisfactory to the other party's attorney, in which the third party agrees to 13 of 43 hold harmless and to defend the other party, its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorney's fees, and all reasonable costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of the construction contract or work performed for the Utility Facilities. SECTION 18. APPLICABLE LAW; JURISDICTION AND VENUE. (A) This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. (B) The parties to this Agreement expressly consent to the jurisdiction of and agree to suit in any court of general jurisdiction in the State, whether state, local or federal, and further agree that venue shall lie in Leon County, Florida. SECTION 19. NOTICE. (A) All notices, certificates or other communications hereunder shall be sufficiently given and shall be deemed given when hand delivered or mailed by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the parties at the following addresses: To the GUA: Florida Governmental Utility Authority C/o Government Services Group, Inc. 280 Wekiva Spring Road Protegrity Plaza, Suite 2000 Longwood, Florida 32779 Attention: Steve Spratt with a copy to: Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A. 1500 Mahan Drive, Suite 200 Tallahassee, Florida 32308 Attention: Heather J. Encinosa, Esq. with a copy to: 0 14 of 43 To Contractor: Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson, Bell & Dunbar, P.A. 215 South Monroe Street, Second Floor Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Attention: John C. Pelham, Esq. U.S. Water Services Corporation Attn: Victoria Penick 4939 Cross Bayou Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34652 With a copy to: U.S. Water Services Corporation Attn: Gary Deremer 4939 Cross Bayou Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34652 With a copy to: Wade Trim Attn: Douglas Watson 25251 Northline Road Taylor, Michigan 48180 With a copy to: Wade Trim Attn: Tom Brzezinski 25251 Northline Road Taylor, Michigan 48180 (B) Any written notice given to one person in subsection (A) of this Section shall also be provided to all other persons identified in subsection (A). (C) The parties may, by notice in writing given to the others, designate any future or different addresses to which the subsequent notices, certificates or other communications shall be sent. Any notice shall be deemed given on the date such 15 of 43 notice is delivered by hand or by facsimile transmission or five (5) days after the date mailed. SECTION 20. ASSIGNMENT. (A) The Contractor shall not have the right to assign any of its rights, duties or obligations under this Agreement without the consent of the GUA Board upon a demonstration by the proposed assignee of its ability to perform the obligations of the Contractor under this Agreement, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. A consented to assignee shall be required to assume the obligations of the assigning party by written assignment in a form reasonably satisfactory to the GUA's attorney. (B) Any assignment of this Agreement consented to by the GUA shall be an assignment of the Agreement in its entirety and the Basic Operation and Maintenance Service and the Basic Billing and Customer Service cannot be severed or assigned separately unless specifically consented to by the GUA; provided, however, this prohibition shall not apply to an affiliate of the Contractor if such separate assignment shall not, in the judgment of the GUA, interfere with the performance of the duties and the provision of the Utility Services provided in this Agreement. (C) The assignment of this Agreement by Contractor shall not relieve the Guarantor of its obligations hereunder unless the proposed assignee provides a substitute guarantor acceptable to the GUA or the GUA determines that a substitute guarantor is not required, in either event such determination shall be at the sole discretion of the GUA. (D) A transfer of a majority of the outstanding stock of the Contractor to another corporate entity, individual or business enterprise shall be deemed an 16 of 43 assignment of the Agreement requiring the consent of the GUA under this Section 20 unless such transfer of outstanding stock of the Contractor is to an affiliated company of the Contractor in which event consent shall not be required under this Section 20. (E) The GUA reserves the right to assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any validly constituted local government, agency or authority. The GUA shall provide the Contractor with prior notice of such assignment. SECTION 21. AMENDMENTS AND WAIVERS. No amendment, supplement, modification or waiver of this Agreement shall be binding upon any party hereto unless executed in writing by such party. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provision of this Agreement, whether or not similar, unless otherwise expressly provided. No waiver of a default or a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall operate nor be construed to operate as a waiver of any subsequent default or breach. SECTION 22. SEVERABILITY. If any clause, subsection, Section or Article of this Agreement shall be ruled invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, then the invalidity of such clause, provision, subsection, Section or Article shall not affect any of the remaining provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such invalid portion did not exist. 0 17 of 43 SECTION 23. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, including the referenced Appendices hereto and the agreements incorporated by reference herein„ is the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, understandings, negotiations, and discussions of the parties, whether oral or written, pertaining to the subject matter hereof. This includes Exceptions and Clarifications to the General Terns Agreement enumerated in Appendix D. Upon execution by all parties, the GUA shall provide the Contractor three complete, certified copies of this Agreement, together with all appendices hereto. This Agreement shall be construed as solely for the benefit of the GUA and the Contractor, their successors and assigns, and no claim or cause of action shall accrue to or be for the benefit of any third party by reason of the execution of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GUA and the Contractor have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and entered into on the date first above written. •t, .fit' ��•. r v� At' f• Attest: FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY By: Its: L�lI U.S. WATER Its: 18 of 43 • • APPENDIX A GOLDEN GATE SYSTEM SERVICE AREA 19 of 43 0 APPENDIX B GOLDEN GATE SYSTEM STAFFING PLAN 20 of 43 GoldenGate 4.00 x.00 1.00 2.00 11.00 vnpm uperawr • bs#omerService Reps . iantLS Mechanic ?D Ti C& Shared Staff 1.00. Reglanal Manager 1.00 Customer Service Manager - 1.00 Operabans Manager WAW � TAD Malnten.ac ca NNanager . 1.00 Contract Administrator , x#.00 EIaan - 1.00 Admin assistant - 1.00 UC Tech . 8.00 PERSONNEL. APPENDIX C TRANSITION PLAN 21 of 43 TRANSITION PLAN — GOLDEN GATE UTILITY SYSTEM INTRODUCTION The Joint Venture of U.S. Water Services Corporation and Wade Trim Services, is pleased to present a transition plan and associated schedules to the Florida Governmental Utility Authority (FGUA) related to the commencement of the Lehigh Acres and Golden Gate Utility System Operations and Maintenance Contract. We are grateful for the opportunity to provide our services to these communities and look forward to a successful professional relationship with the FGUA. We have taken the opportunity to outline our transition plan and also confirm previously discussed service delivery issues that particularly may be impacted by the incumbent circumstances of the Aloha System. Our Philosophy The guiding philosophy of US Water 1 Wade Trim (USWIWT) is to achieve a seamless transition that is beneficial to the client and invisible to the local consumer. USW/WT will invest a large amount of effort prior to the contract commencement in developing a cohesive working relationship that will enable a successful completion of all aspects of the contract stipulations. To support proper implementation, transition activity must be properly staffed, must have co- operation and most importantly, must be well communicated and considerate of the effect on employees to guard against regressive activities detrimental to forward progress. USWNVT understands the FGUA requires a transition plan that will ensure continuous and uninterrupted service in the distribution of high quality drinking water, the collection and treatment of wastewater and continuous billing and collection of these services and excellent customer service. The approach to transition must be efficient and complete in implementation, such that all involved can adapt to the USWIWT methods and organizational structure. A viable Transition Plan is one that addresses all activities necessary for the continued operation of the system, including those necessary to meet regulatory and licensing requirements, and those contributing to highest levels of water quality and customer service. To the customer this transition should go unnoticed except for improvements. Our Focus on Quality of Service USWNVT will put into place recording and accountability methods that allow us to refine our processes continuously. We are committed, both during the transition and afterwards, to providing our employees with the empowerment, skills, training and knowledge to operate the systems to the highest standards. USWNVT understands that upon Commencement Date financial reporting shall be provided in a format agreeable to the FGUA. 22 of 43 101 Our Operational and Maintenance Strategy The operating plan will show experience regarding the Operation and Maintenance of Water and Wastewater facilities within the State of Florida. Our operating plan is supported by a thorough understanding and knowledge of the processes to be employed at the facilities. We are intimately familiar with the treatment methods for both water and wastewater. As part of our approach to the transition, we will provide a statement of conditions report indicating a thorough review of all systems, the maintenance and operational status of all equipment, the need for repairs at contract startup and identifying the routine maintenance required while describing those maintenance cycles within the maintenance plan. Those items found to be in a state of disrepair, or otherwise not functioning, will be identified and prioritized for the benefit of the FGUA thereby sharing our observations of system functionality with FGUA representatives upon completion. During the transition period, we will compare what we consider to be optimal operational strategies based on a comprehensive system of performance and efficiency. The System Condition report will be the primary basis for the Initial Repair and Replacement Report that is typically due to be submitted to the FGUA shortly after Commencement. On a yearly basis, this report will be revised and updated by UWSIWT prior to submittal to the FGUA for review and approval, therefore becoming part of the extended Capital Improvement Plan. Our Team Approach As part of this transition plan, we ask the FGUA to approve the accompanying Transition Management and Deliverables Schedule. This schedule outlines in detail a transition plan focused on asset assessment, operating strategy, existing conditions, quality of service, capital investment, maintenance efficiencies and communications and reporting. Development of these principals allows USW/WT and the FGUA to fundamentally guarantee a successful delivery of the project by providing the framework necessary for setting the standard for continued operations. The interaction and straight forward communication of all issues important to the FGUA and USW/WT during project transition is significant. USW/WT will develop supplemental plans that will outline the necessary resources required in achieving a successful transition. USW/WT will work interactively with the FGUA regarding: O Asset Condition Assessment O Capital Improvement Planning D Information Technology Preferences 0 Customer Services Preferences O Accounting -Reporting Parameters O Operational Parameters 23 of 43 O Facility Inspections O Asset Inventory Audit O Proper Renewal and Replacement Scheduling 4 Contract Administration O Management of Water Quality 0 Regulatory Compliance Mitigation Communication of the above issues coupled with the development and approval of the transition staff will enable the USWMT — FGUA Team, working together to develop the successful delivery of the project. We anticipate that USW/WT transition management and support resources will be required at varying levels of involvement throughout the 9 -month total transition period (6 months pre - commencement and 3 months post commencement) and well into the implementation of the contract. This involvement will create minimum disruption to the existing operational work environment, and if planned and executed carefully, will ensure a seamless transition. Successful Implementation The transition plan put into place prior to the commencement of the contract will include all procedures and personnel necessary to effectively transition all systems. USWMT began basic general Transition activities upon delivering initial Guaranteed Maximum Prices and then prior to submitting price proposals to the FGUA Board in December 2010. USW/WT has developed a transition outline that includes the proposed management dedicated to the project, a schedule of activities important to transition and a general outline of the commitments necessary for the successful delivery of the project. Exhibit A accompanying this Transition Plan presents a transition schedule and is included to provide insight to the FGUA on the scope of transition. A formal Statement of Conditions Report will be provided to the FGUA for the Golden Gate System no later than 45 days prior to operation commencement including categories outlined as follows: Table of Contents: Service Area System Mapping Water Treatment System Water Distribution Collection System Evaluation Wastewater Treatment System Reuse Water System Evaluation Customer Service Center Evaluation Human Resources Preliminary Capital Improvement Program Initial Renewal and Replacement Plan 1. Chapter I Introduction 24 of 43 1.1. Introduction 1.2. Authority & System Background 1.3. Objectives of the Systems Evaluation 2. Chapter II Service Area 2.1. Introduction 2.2. Defined service area map 3. Chapter III System Mapping 3.1. Introduction 3.2. Current status of system mapping 3.3. Critical areas of concern 4. Chapter IV Water System Evaluation 4.1. Introduction 4.2. Individual Water Plant Reports • Well Head & Pump Condition • Chemical Feed Systems • Remote Telemetry & Monitoring • Hydrogen Sulfide Analysis by Plant Location 4.2.1. Distribution System Pressure Analysis O 4.2.2. Meter Inventory 4.2.3. Cross Connection Plan 4.2.4. Key Distribution System Valve Identification & Operability Assessment 4.2.5. Fire Hydrant Inventory and Random Sample of 10 Hydrant Flow Test 4.2.6. System Pressure Analysis Report 5. Chapter V Wastewater System Evaluation 5.1. Introduction 5.2. Collection System Evaluation 5.2.1. Report on 50 Randomly Selected Manholes 5.2.2. Potential I&I Assessment 5.3. Wastewater Plant System Evaluation 5.3.1. Master Lift Station 5.3.2. Head Works 5.3.3. Equalization Tank 5.3.4. Aeration 5.3.5. Clarifiers 5.3.6. Intermediate Plant Lift Station 5.3.7. Effluent Filters 5.3.8. Disinfection 5.3.9. Residuals Management 5.3.10. Building & Grounds 25 of 43 5.3.11. Miscellaneous 5.4. Lift Station Evaluation 5.4.1. Evaluation Report Method 5.4.2. Individual Station Reports (78) • Wet Well Condition • Control Panel Condition • Pump Condition & Flow Rate • Alarms & Security 6. Chapter VI Reuse Water System Evaluation 6.1. Introduction 6.2. Reuse Operating Protocol Review and Recommendations 6.3. Major Users 6.4. System Condition 7. Chapter VII Health and Safety 7.1. Introduction 7.2. Utility System Report 8. Chapter VII Customer Service Center Evaluation 8.1. IT Infrastructure & Telephony Review 8.2. Current Business Practices Review 8.2.1. Plan to Incorporate USWSC/FGUA requirements 8.3. Develop Daily/Weekly/Monthly Operating SOP's 8.4. Web Access and Remote Accessibility 8.5. Determine Compatibility of Existing System and MUNIS 8.6. Evaluate Meter Inventory Records 8.7. Evaluate Meter Reading Equipment 8.7.1. Description of System Conditions 8.7.2. Capabilities 8.7.3. Software 8.8. Payment via Web — E -Commerce 8.8.1. Credit Card — Debit Card 8.8.2. Electronic Check 8.9. Current Performance and Ramifications to Service Levels per Contract 8.9.1. A/R Aging 8.9.2. Customer Complaints 8.9.3. Phone Performance 9. Chapter IX Human Resources Existing Incumbent Staff Interviews 9.2 Pre -Employment Activities (Drug Tests, Background Checks, etc.) 9.3 Offer Letters 9.4 Training Needs Assessments 9.5 Training Programs 26 of 43 10.Chapter X Initial Capital Improvement Program Recommendations 0 10.1. Introduction 10.2. Water System 10.3. Wastewater System 10.4. Reuse Water System 10.5. Customer Service 11. Chapter XI Initial Renewal and Replacement Plan 11.1. Introduction 11.2. Water System 11.3. Wastewater System 11.4. Reuse Water System 11.5. Customer Service TRANSITION TEAM U.S. Water and Wade Trim (USW/WT) have identified and assembled a transition team experienced in the Water and Wastewater Industry. This transition team will draw upon the knowledge of select management personnel, engineering consultations, administrative staff and operation specialists with expertise in dealing with utility systems, process technology, equipment, regulations, finance, and resources all of which represent issues to be evaluated during the transition period. Top management of the USW/WT transition team has been involved in numerous successful transitions of operations and in many cases, of utility ownership. The USW/WT transition philosophy retains that management personnel allocated to transition activities be solely assigned to transitional activities of the FGUA systems. Gaining acquired knowledge, these individuals will continue to be available after transition is complete, allowing operational staff to have access to their knowledge. This combination of operational & transition personnel will allow the transition activities to be effective in gaining general system knowledge and the ability of forging relationships among key people relative to the successful performance of the contract entities. In addition, this system allows personnel to be focused on critical issues through short term specialty assignments affording them the ability to prioritize issues relative to importance USW/WT provides a transition management team consisting of a select group of highly experienced managers and support resources. The organizational structure of the transition team can be seen in Exhibit A and includes full time involvement from the following personnel: O Transition Manager O Project Director Q Customer Service Team 0 Human Resources Personnel 27 of 43 G System Evaluation Team O Project Control Team 4 Team Engineers, & Administration & Technical Specialists The Transition Manager will be given authority to coordinate all aspects of the transition plan and the efforts of the transition team under the management of the Project Director. The Transition Manager is accountable for ensuring that the management and organization support infrastructure is in place before the contract commencement date. The Transition Manager will also maintain a general overview of all transition activities and, along with the Project Director, will provide the key interface with FGUA in working through transition details. The contractor's transition organization chart is attached as schedule A. This area left intentionally blank. 28 of 43 The Project Director will direct the Transition Manager and the rest of the team to setup the organizational framework and also maintain a general overview of all transition activities. Responsibilities of the Transition Manager and Project Director are to include: O Communication with FGUA Officials O Customer Service Center Development O Customer Service Software Implementation D Transition of Customer Service Data D Customer Service Staff Development O System Condition Assessments O Process Audits O Capital Planning O Negotiations with Vendors O New Employee Hires O Other Human Resources Activities O Development of Compliance Efforts O Transition of Operations O Overall Project Implementation 29 of 43 Transition Support Staff will assist these individuals in attaining these goals and the goals set forth by the FGUA during transition negotiations. Human Resources A viable transition plan is one that addresses all activities necessary for the continued operation of the system. Perhaps, one of the most important factors in any well run system is having well trained and dedicated employees in the correct areas of responsibility. USW/WT understands potential employee concerns due to the change of management and is prepared to address and minimize any concerns early in the transition process. Good communication will allow affected employees to learn of our company. With the incumbent operator's agreement, we will coordinate an introduction with the existing staff to inform them regarding our company and the scope of the new service contract. We will then commence with the interview process with the existing staff to determine who may be interested in joining our firm. Our desire is to hire the most competent, qualified and energetic individuals to operate the FGUA facilities. The key components of our human resources hiring program are: O An initial communication introducing employees to our company, 4 Individual Interviews and response to quest.ons, O Finalize position descriptions with information for all relevant sources with regard to the type of vacancy and the qualifications, skills and experience of the individuals required to fill them, O Preparation of job descriptions for available position is to be sent to the current workforce and, will be advertised locally and statewide, if the requirement for specialist skills cannot be obtained from current plant employees, O Invitation to all candidates to interview for available positions O Careful and thorough employee assessments using generic and specific criteria • Reference and Background checking USW/WT commits that the employee evaluation and retention process will be open, fair, and non-discriminatory and in accordance with existing company policies. Due to the limited time available within the transition period - prior to the commencement date, we are devoted to beginning the Human Resource element immediately following contractor selection. We are committed to the development of the program and remain confident that operational and administrative systems can be installed and staff transferred and/or hired in a manner that will provide a seamless transfer of the utilities prior to contract commencement. USWAAIT will standby with personnel already in place to provide services during the transition to augment services as needed. Communications USW/WT acknowledges that FGUA has a current communications plan in place. Although many issues are inclusive to customer service, we feel that communication 3t} of 43 with the client is the most important. Communication through scheduled face-to-face meetings, documented electronic correspondence, operational reports or a phone call to any one of the USW/WT management staff is part of our communication processes. USW/WT understands that the transfer of operations may cause concern within FGUA, the communities being served and the incumbent employees. The most critical goal in the transition will be to keep open lines of communication with the FGUA. Inventory/Interface A very important part of the transition plan is to gain as much insight as possible prior to the commencement date. USW/WT will evaluate the current operation and maintenance procedures and prior to commencement; USW/WT will establish procedures appropriate to successful utility system management in order to meet USW/WT internal operating standards. A major project that will occur during this pre -commencement period is a comprehensive audit of the system infrastructure. We will seek to confirm all assets of the utility system. Reporting and Resource Management During the transition period, USWMT will develop jointly with FGUA the specific requirements for management reporting as needed beyond the reports outlined in Appendix D to the Compensation Agreement. Continued confirmation of accuracy of data available at commencement will continue up to 45 days post Commencement Date. In addition, USWWT will put in place procedures to guide facility and staff in matters related to payroll, timekeeping, benefits, requisitioning, accounts payable, receiving, petty cash, expenses, inventory adjustment, and daily and month end procedures. Note: Direct Connectivity: Prior to the Commencement Date, USW/WT will make connectivity available to the FGUA to enable FGUA Administration direct remote access to data reporting, including those related to maintenance, financial activity and customer billing. Mutually agreed upon interim reporting formats and methods will be utilized until such time connectivity is available. Transition Schedule The USW/WT transition schedule, included as Exhibit A illustrates the key activities and duration required during the outlined 9 -month total transition period. The key areas of activity will be in establishing the contract requirements; setting up the information, administration, maintenance, customer account and finance systems; implementing a joint communications strategy; recruitment and transfer of employees, evaluation of infrastructure and transition of operations and maintenance functions. 31 of 43 New Hire Communication: It is the goal of USWMT to provide employment for all eligible current employees involved with the Lehigh Acres and Golden Gate Utility Systems. Prior to the Commencement Date USWMT will conduct briefing sessions for all affected employees and distribute company information as soon as authorized. The distribution of transition information will help control speculation and misinformation. With permission of current operator, USWMT will begin preliminary interviews, screenings and evaluations of existing personnel prior to commencement and at the earliest possible date. This will allow proper hiring consideration of all persons employed by the system at the time of transfer. Information Transfer: For continuity of operations, we propose that all relevant and pertinent information required to support continued uninterrupted operations be turned over to USWNVT as early in the process as possible; access to incumbent customer service data should begin 04101111. This will include all current and historical operating reports, laboratory data, and maintenance records, whether in hard copy or digital format. Training of Staff: To transfer staff to the company philosophy of USW/WT, we will provide targeted training to all transferring staff in accordance with the system needs and individual assignments. Implementation of Customer Service: The Controller of USW will perform account review, participate in parallel billing and establish new customer service procedures or software to conform to the Agreement requirements. The Controller will directly participate in the conversion of data as required as well as accomplishing the successful operation of the billing and collections system. USWMT will complete conversion, parallel test and have the customer service billing system compliant with FGUA requirements by the Commencement Date. USWMT anticipates that the data conversion, updating of telephone systems — if needed - to an adequate function, training and implementation of required reporting structures will span the 9 -month transition period to become fully compliant with the terms and conditions of the Customer Service delivery performance standards of the Golden Gate Contract. However, full service functionality to customers will be provided on the Commencement Date. Note: Customer Service Tele hone System: The terms and conditions of the contract dictate specific telephone response and limited wait times for customer telephone call - ins. The telephone system(s) are owned by the FGUA and during the transition period it is recommended that the communications system be evaluated to determine if there exist an adequate number of telephone lines, call count and wait time recording abilities, message and emergency forwarding, etc. It is understood that any telephone systems or upgrades needed will be funded at FGUA's discretion. 32 of 43 Inventory Audit: We will deliver an inventory of existing assets, consumables and spare parts no later than 14 days prior to Commencement Date. Initial Condition Survey/Statement of Conditions: During the Transition period USWMT staff will conduct the initial condition survey of all structural assets of the systems, as access permits. A draft of the Conditions Survey will be provided 45 days prior to Commencement Date. A final Conditions Survey will be delivered no later than 45 days after the Commencement Date. The details of this survey will be used to populate the CMMS during the Transition Period. Preliminary findings will be reported to FGUA in a Statement of Conditions draft for review. Information Technology Review: Any of the computer-based systems required by USW/WT will need to be identified and where appropriate reviewed and purchased. Confirmation 60 days prior to the Commencement Date will be required by USWMT regarding hardware available for continued use while providing services. Insurance/Guaranty Agreement: We will finalize arrangements for requested insurance and guaranty coverage pursuant to the Compensation Agreement and General Terms Agreements. Emergency and Contingency Pian: Any existing emergency and contingency plans will be updated prior to the Commencement Date. The manuals will be prepared with a high degree of consistency and familiarity to provide an easy-to-use and easy -to understand guide for the operational and maintenance staff. We will submit the revised manuals for approval no later than 30 days prior to Commencement Date, including disaster recovery of CIS. Open Accounts: USWMT will open accounts with vendors and suppliers for spare parts, consumables, chemicals, resources and insurance. Purchased water or power is not included in the base O&M contract pricing. Vendor Accounts: USWMT's provides services in the immediate geographical area in relation to the Golden Gate System and is well established with local and national vendors. It is the duty of our staff to conduct a rigorous examination of price, financial stability, experience, Occupational Health and Safety record, quality procedures and accreditation status, ability to adopt our operating procedures and availability. During the Transition Period, we will make arrangements with sub -contractors and suppliers that might be additionally required. Additional Transition Concerns Inventory of Residuals Recognizing the possibility that the current operator may allow excess residuals to build up within the Digesters and Clarifiers of the facilities prior to the termination of the 33 of 43 contract, predicting the amount of residuals left in digesters and improperly run plant processes prior to contract commencement is un -foreseeable. USW/WT has not accounted for this disposal in our proposal and asks that the FGUA regard this possible issue as deferred maintenance should residuals volume exist greater than 25% within the digesters, or presents a mixed liquor greater than 3,500/mg/I in the aeration tank. If either condition is present, USW/WT will share the cost of removal equally with FGUA. Deferred Maintenance All equipment subject to delayed/deferred maintenance that is identifiable will be reported during our Statement of Conditions, R&R and CIP investigations, which will also include condition of vehicles and field equipment that are to be provided by the System to USWNI/T. The equipment that is serving the System at contract startup, and is provided to USW/WT, will be maintained by USWIWT in the condition provided at commencement, until retirement of said equipment. Note: Collection Line Cleaning Requirement — Due to unknowns of the conditions of the system lines, the requirement to maintain an annual 10% system line cleaning schedule is dictated by the terms and conditions of operation of this System - it is mutually understood that this particular scope of work is related to deferred maintenance and is added to the System R&R schedule. The cost of providing the line cleaning services have been removed from the pricing schedule of USWNVT and are not considered a part of the routine services to be provided. IF the need is apparent, USWWT will clean lines as necessary at points of line repair interventions to enhance proper functioning of the system. Severe line conditions will be reported to the FGUA and the FGUA will aschedule and budget for supplemental cleaning services at its discretion. Safety Awareness A safety coordinator will be responsible for the development and implementation of the site-specific safety program. A schedule for the Health and Safety meetings will be established prior to commencement of the contract and during the site survey any safety issues will be identified. Cooperation of the Existing Operator As is typical with the transfer of operations management of this magnitude it remains a possibility that the previous operator may not cooperate with the incoming USW/WT staff. USWMT will make every effort to work with the existing operator prior to contract commencement by extending positions to current staff which would become active at commencement, and communicating our needs effectively and appropriately. If the outgoing operator is unwilling to cooperate with USWMT, we ask the FGUA to take into account this concern and assist in any way possible. Vehicles and Equipment System vehicles shall be inventoried and conditions noted. The vehicles that are serving the System at contract startup will be provided for use to USWMT. USWNVT will maintain the vehicles in the condition they are provided at Commencement Date. 34 of 43 USW/WT will place FGUA signage on all vehicles provided by FGUA if updated signage is needed. The Equipment to be provided by the FGUA for each System: John Deere Tractor with mower & pull behind disc (1) Portable Generator (2) Toro Lawn Mower (1) Respectfully Submitted, Gary Deremer, President U.S. Water/ Wade Trim, LLC This section left intentionally blank. 35 of 43 I° LO OL 3? � � �k X00 3x; E 2 2 � @ � £� &§ c� ka_o §® «� . a ;J$ �2 \CD � o § �w r,- § ■ �§ — � w§ ��] o R C ca� � 2k � ■� �2 all a ■IL IL k� k E �In CL km M §A CC ■ . L =2 dC 0 ■A Exhibit A: Transition Schedule & Checklist 0 �y 36 of 43 - . . -.- .—U .we w— � f2 } 7� ! !; , � | � I ! k■ . ! �| # � . ] ! � � � | a | &T . . T z , ! ! jIII all I IL - � ! ! ! ƒ } } } } � � xt'x':7xy3 cvry 5. �A X Y Q •+ µ - 9ullsal lalleaed put BuRsal u!eaq of palaldww aq pings uollem8guo)-ale41e� *a I Mnf ....... ullsal lallejed put Sullsal ullaq � S M R } r A au ssaulsnq pu euopejngquoa sassmwd aq - of augap of saaAoldwa pua swoWS L -S of ... a aney lsnw uollejodM sajliva53aleM 5 n al x. - w a Aa4sllgnw Rl lsnw sluawa�lnbag IuWodaa -aleU loppo !6 d _ _ .rCL j N d CA IV aj d C C- u C H r N G d y O a+ p d ++ G G7 M ++ W N C 3 v C': C Ulu O N C N W INJ1 rr N E Lu, C N N NN m G1 4! fO C i6 u C 2 Q7 ?U d N 1.1 J.+ u c w a E a o, - o - m ,n o c un u Q aLA � a w 3 u N cc mIU aNi a m C z d Cc rl- C N N= C d m S m C �i u C =,° 'n G C �o R Q m 9 as '= u Co Fes- m m c e t �i N 7 W a Li Q¢ Q Q c o a w a `m E a a ate, » E a N E 'a E a E r m O v LL LL a LL LL Co f- 1.1 U L O U D a i/ipq [y) Li C O O co O cn w 1 4 R �A X Y Q •+ µ - 9ullsal lalleaed put BuRsal u!eaq of palaldww aq pings uollem8guo)-ale41e� *a I Mnf ....... ullsal lallejed put Sullsal ullaq � S M R } r A au ssaulsnq pu euopejngquoa sassmwd aq - of augap of saaAoldwa pua swoWS L -S of ... a aney lsnw uollejodM sajliva53aleM 5 n al x. - w a Aa4sllgnw Rl lsnw sluawa�lnbag IuWodaa -aleU loppo !6 d _ _ .rCL j N d CA IV aj d C C- u C H r N G d y O a+ p d ++ G G7 M ++ W N C 3 v C': C Ulu O N C N W INJ1 rr N E Lu, C N N NN m G1 4! fO C i6 u C 2 Q7 ?U d N 1.1 J.+ u c w a E a o, - o - m ,n o c un u Q aLA � a w 3 u N cc mIU aNi a m C z d Cc rl- C N N= C d m S m C �i u C =,° 'n G C �o R Q m 9 as '= u Co Fes- m m c e t �i N 7 W a Li Q¢ Q Q c o a w a `m E a a ate, » E a N E 'a E a E r m O v LL LL a LL LL Co f- 1.1 U L O U D a i/ipq [y) Li C O O co O cn i ...7 .. . . .. ■ , k� ■ ` me Ja o m] 2- . \! � �. . � , J mpai #woaqWou A%ucc):3)-aIpV3T«rkRn,mied@•kn,uIZMmP,«wwmp�o4s mmnpca.aQl■ \� 2® !: � -KJV3We spau-sau;snq@&mei©ao_dm-q_@Pq■aWw«■jai-WAS mm.met, Wnwmmo o3sa3 ■ }= 2 . § � t § 2 5 CL © 2 cr k - m � / E E Cko k Ln k 2 a _2 2 . <± �2 JJ k 4m CL LA / \ 0 2 = 8 0 ¢ 2 ■ k ® " A ■ E 2 2% E c§= 0)° 2 z 2 0 2 3 m g 2 k 2 0 o 2 2 k \ § � � § ƒ CL ƒ fo ao � R anAwl UI 111% PUB $03 Ile Suplel u18ag PULP uadp aue suawin EPULP tet+ 481491 WE uagOP0 Aapuovj a;ep Janp ink -jolt In uO'Pu,nsa7 u,8aq of pa;aldwao aq pino4s uolieun8quo:)- a3sp w!ip'j t Alnr ....... SuRsai lalleaed pug Sul;sal u1Saf C P N � N, R t f r y N W ^ ".Puasjwm s n aze0 '1vowko ,.... spaau ssaulsnq pu suopeunSl}uos sassaoaud aq - of aupp of saaAaldwa pus swauAs 1-S oa ssami M 'S .r. 96 c 0 V H � c� x x a+ U O as cu C. 41 > > 0 nE+ d ea y vt L. e m r= y G w 5 E 6! t+ a c a r r ;^ = •� E y G a °° > G a m m� C c m e 3 5 o ,n o m y N °! CL a 3 w w 3 3= 'i w Ln n 4 b m ai m ea m a C C O U co Q � � is ,� O w 0 � S aj 8 a ra o a z a m d a r a" c � a� a a U v Qi O —y E a 3 0 d C > 6l > 4' ,0 ,0 a j a u ., E c d a cu U ; v a a °u 3 E C CL a '� E t m Ln kn a„CL l'1 0 �. Ln 0 (D 'u. ano (D a F- o a m m O ��=� � = . µms_ -'x r. �,��- ' .- • r � - �r .. �: , a r w Z n a x x 5 " "q ort pataldmoa aq pinoys uolleinZUuo:)- a;ep IvI74r T Alnf §s �s T M aneq MUJ ugmodio•J wjwas jaiem s n azea iv3wv3 x e 3 c a o ftp f 3 H 0 d 6O oTo �y 'A o p 43 a u C cuL i m tA � E m a o C 3 s Z � LU Tm vio o Tm CL at a c a m m c M c aM o `w aOU'2CL r O :3OraCU Car m 0 it 'A CL E �wu a: 2 0 d o_HoU m 41 `O Nm �c 0 Z O G U) O an 0 APPENDIX D GENERAL TERMS AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS 1 CLARIFICATIONS 37 of 43 Appendix D General Terms Agreement Exceptions/Clarifications: Section 2.02 (a) — The Section is clarified to mean that the Contractor is required to provide staff necessary to comply with contract performance standards as well as comply with the staffing plan and applicable law and permits. Section 2.06 Contractors Vehicles — The requirement in Section 2.06 of the General Terms Agreement relating to uniform signage on all contractor's vehicles is clarified to include vehicles used by Contractorrs public contact subcontractors including meter readers Section 3.02 (13)(6) To remove any potential for misunderstanding, the Contractor's fees and charges outlined in paragraph 3.02 (13)(8) of the same section and the related reference Appendix H shall prevail in any conflict with Section 3.02 (13)(6) Section 5.01 (B)(7) the referenced staffing requirement shall be met on the Commencement Date and in accordance with the staffing plan accompanying the Compensation Agreement Section 5.03 Contractor's oral notification of emergency repair within 2 hours and in writing within 24 hours shall include mutually agreed upon scope of work. Section 6.05 retention of public records shall be consistent with Compensation Agreement and fully compliant with Florida Public Records laws Appendix D - Reports Required from the Contractor is Updated and Clarified on the following page: 38 of 43 Miscellaneous Confirmations: (1) Project Cost Request "5 day response time": Throughout the Initial Term of the Compensation Agreement, the five (5) day clock begins once written scope of work and specifications are received in the USW/WT office via fax, email or hard copy. (2) CMMS Cost as required in Section 3.01(m) of General Terms „Agreement: Cost of CMMS software, setup and data population to be bome by USW/WT. The degree of CMMS functional capability shall be no less than that available for other FGUA-USWWT systems at the Commencement Date. While data collection begins pre -commencement, it is anticipated that timing for completion of fully updated CMMS will be accomplished by 45 days after commencement date. (3) ERC's: Throughout the Initial Term of the Compensation Agreement, ERC's are calculated by the Meter Equivalency Factors noted below: Meter Size 518" X 3/4' 1" 2„ 3" 4" 6" 817 100.0„ FM—e—ter Equivalency Factor 1.0 2.5 5.0 8.0 15.0 25.0 50.0 80.0 115.0 (4) Active Meters: Throughout the Initial Term of the Compensation Agreement, active meters are defined as locations that have, or have had, service provided. (5) Locates: Throughout the Initial Term of the Compensation Agreement, Locates included in the Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee are described as an open dig of 4' x 4' or equivalent effectiveness of "soft digs". Due to concerns of accuracy of existing mapping of the System, multiple attempts to provide locates, when maps are not correct, beyond that described above shall be treated as a separate work authorization payable by FGUA. (6) Capital Projects: Throughout the Initial Term of the Compensation Agreement, for purposes of financial reporting classification, Capital projects shall be defined as any work with a value over $5,000.00. 43 of 43 AMENDMENT TO GOLDEN GATE SYSTEM COMPENSATION AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO GOLDEN GATE UTILITY SYSTEM COMPENSATION AGREEMENT dated March 17, 2011, ("Amended Agreement"), Is made and entered Into as of this day of/ � � xC� 2016. by and between the Florida Governmental Utility Authority, a legal entity and public body created by Interlocal agreement pursuant to section 163.01(7)(g), Florida Statutes (the "GUA"), and U.S. WaterMade Trim, LLC (the "Contractor"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on or about October 8, 2008, the GUA and the Contractor entered into that certain General Terns Agreement for Utility Operations, Maintenance, Billing, and Customer Service (the "General Terns Agreement'), which outlines the terns and conditions under which the Contractor will provide Utility Services for certain GUA Systems; and WHEREAS, on or about March 17, 2011 pursuant to the General Terms Agreement, the GUA and the Contractor entered into a Compensation Agreement for the Utility Facilities located in Collier County, Florida known by the GUA as the Golden Gate System for which the Contractor has provided Utility Services pursuant to the terms outlined in the General Terms Agreement; and WHEREAS, the GUA desires to engage the Contractor to continue providing Utility Services in accordance with the General Terms Agreement, and WHEREAS, the Contractor represents that it currently has, and will continue to have throughout the term of this Compensation Agreement, the experience, resources and professional skill to provide the Utility Services required to operate and maintain the Utility Facilities In the Golden Gate System, to timely and accurately bill for service provided and to maintain effective relationships with utility customers. NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, representations and agreements contained herein, the parties to the March 17, 2011 Compensation Agreement do agree for themselves, their successors and assigns to the amendments as outlined below. ARTICLE 1. Section 14 of the Compensation Agreement is amended to read as follows: SECTION 14. TERM OF AGREEMENT. (A) The Initial Term of the contract shall begin on the Commencement Date and end on September 30, 2016. Effective October 1, 2016, the term of the contract is extended for an additional three -years to end on September 30, 2019 (the "Amended Term") under the same terms as the Initial Tenn, with the exception of paragraph (B) of this section (B) Upon mutual agreement, the contract may be extended for an additional two-year term at the conclusion of the Amended Term. Upon the exercise of this option, the GUA and the Contractor will negotiate a mutually acceptable Basic Operation and Maintenance Service Fee and Basic Billing and Customer Service Fee for the next two- year period after the conclusion of the Amended Term. ARTICLE 2. SURVIVAL OF OTHER PROVISIONS All other provisions of the Compensation Agreement not Inconsistent herewith shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GUA and the Contractor have carried this Amended Agreement to be duly executed and entered into on the date first above written. FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY By. OLJZ�- aA-v�� Its: Attest: &, ja--tL� - U.S. WA BI Its Attest: �0