The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 06/13/2017 Item #17C06/13/2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve County-initiated amendments to the Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, to amend the Area of Critical State Concern overlay within the Future Land Use Element to provide for an agreement pursuant to Section 380.032(3) Florida Statutes; and to update and clarify text and correct map errors and omissions specifically amending the Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map; Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element to remove the discharge rates; Transportation Element and Transportation Map Series; and the Capital Improvement Element, for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for Review and Comments Response. (Adoption Hearing) (CPSP-2013-11/PL20130002637) OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to approve several individual staff- initiated amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO). CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government’s adopted Growth Management Plan. 2. The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the “local planning agency” under Chapter 163.3174, F.S. and the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC), held their Adoption hearing for petition CPSP-2013-11/PL20130002637 on April 20, 2017. 3. This is the Adoption hearing for these out-of-Cycle, staff-proposed amendments to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME), Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map and Map Series, Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map, Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facility Element, Transportation Element and Transportation Map Series, and the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. The amendments that are the subject of this hearing are limited in scope primarily to those directed by the Board following the adoption of 2011 EAR-based GMP amendments and previous “batch” GMP amendments. Though not necessarily recommended by specific reference in the EAR, these general updating and “house cleaning” amendments typically seek to add clarity, correct text and map errors or omissions, provide harmony, and maintain internal consistency among components of the Plan. A specific set of changes to the FLUE Overlays and Special Features Section follow from Board direction to amend Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) Overlay provisions. A small number of these staff-initiated changes are associated with recent amendments proposed for or adopted in the Land Development Code (LDC), changes in the 2014 and 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR), or with changes in State or Federal regulations, and to revise format, structure and language to follow other Board directives. Additionally, staff has proposed minor revisions to certain CCME and FLUE policies and provisions that were considered at transmittal hearings. Further explanation and staff analysis is provided in the CCPC Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts to Collier County result from this amendment other than the costs associated with legal advertising/public notice for the public hearings, which are borne by the County. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of these amendments by the Board for adoption and 17.C Packet Pg. 1373 06/13/2017 their transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity will commence the Department’s forty-five (45) day State Coordinated Review process. If determined by the Department to be “in compliance” with Florida Statutes and no challenge to that determination is timely filed, then these amendments will become effective. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is authorized by, and subject to the procedures established in, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The Community Planning Act, and by Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: “plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue.” 163.3177(1)(f), FS In addition, s. 163.3177(6)(a)2, FS provides that FLUE plan amendments shall be based on surveys, studies and data regarding the area, as applicable including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of non-conforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The need to modify land uses and development patterns with antiquated subdivisions. i. The discouragement of urban sprawl. j. The need for job creation, capital investment and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community’s economy. And FLUE map amendments shall also be based upon the following analysis per Section 125.3177(6)(a)8.: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires an affirmative vote of four for approval because this is an Adoption hearing of the GMP amendment. [HFAC] COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL: That the EAC forward proposed revisions to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) and the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) found in Petition CPSP-2013- 11/PL20130002637 to the CCPC with a recommendation to adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER 17.C Packet Pg. 1374 06/13/2017 COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the Planning Commission, sitting as the EAC, forward proposed revisions to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) and the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) found in Petition CPSP-2013-11/PL20130002637 to the Board with a recommendation to adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (vote: 6/0), subject to changes noted below under CCPC Recommendation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the Planning Commission forward Petition CPSP-2013-11/PL20130002637 to the Board with a recommendation to adopt and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition at their April 20, 2017 meeting. There were no public speakers to this item. A small number of minor changes not seen in Transmittal were also discussed. The CCPC forwarded petition CPSP-2013- 11/PL20130002637 to the Board with a recommendation to approve for adoption and transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (vote: 6/0), along with the other items discussed, and revisions described below which are reflected in the individual Ordinance Exhibit “A’s”. Commissioners discussed minor modifications that could be made within the scope of transmittal -to- adoption activities (to text or maps already included in the Exhibit A’s), and could be prepared prior to finalizing exhibits for Board consideration. The modifications include: revising CCME Policy 10.5.4 further, to change “shall” to “may” in 2nd sentence; revising job titles listed in CCME Policy 12.3.3 with less specificity, as may be appropriate, to account for long-term, recurring changes to County representatives assigned to special task groups; removing formal reference to the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida from FLUE Objective 7, as it provides no rules or regulations not already codified in the GMP; furthering the standardization of showing both written numbers and their parenthetical numerals within FLUE Policies and provisions already appearing in Exhibit “A”; and verifying a specific PUD’s boundaries on FLUE Activity Center #16 map [and others] and updating as needed. This group of additional specific changes are incorporated into the Ordinance Exhibit “A’s”, with one exception; using discretion as provided in the CCPC motion, staff did not revise CCME Policy 12.3.3 to remove specificity. This issue may be addressed as part of a future “batch” amendment when it can be considered as part of a comprehensive review of GMP policies and provisions. Commissioners also discussed modifications that are outside the scope of transmittal -to-adoption activities (to text or maps not included in the Exhibit A’s), or could not be prepared within the schedule to finalize exhibits for Board consideration. These modifications include: formally referencing outside documents differently (e.g. showing publication dates), especially those that may also be referenced in the LDC or another regulatory document; researching to ensure descriptions of habitat management, protection, preservation or other similar plans identified in CCME Policy 7.1.2 and FLUE RLSA Policy 5.5 are appropriately referenced; revising job titles listed elsewhere in the GMP with less specificity, as may be appropriate, to account for long-term, recurring changes to County representatives; and 17.C Packet Pg. 1375 06/13/2017 removing formal references to the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida from elsewhere in the FLUE and elsewhere in the GMP; completing the standardization of showing both written numbers and their parenthetical numerals throughout the GMP. This group of additional changes are expected to require substantive research, thorough reviews to confirm they’re following original Board direction, and cross-referencing for internal consistency within the GMP before being considered for inclusion in a later “batch” of staff-initiated amendments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: To adopt and transmit petition CPSP-2013-11/PL20130002637 to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity as revised to reflect the CCPC recommendation discussed above. Prepared by: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, and David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Adoption Staff Report_CP-2013-11-FNL_w-signatures (PDF) 2. Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (PDF) 3. Ordinance - Adoption CIE - 050217 (PDF) 4. Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (PDF) 5. Ordinance - Adoption GG Area Master Plan FLUM - 0(1) (PDF) 6. Ordinance - Adoption Stormwater - 050217 (PDF) 7. Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (PDF) 8. [Linked] Adopted Resolution_#2016-280 (PDF) 9. Batch 2 Transmtl ExecSumm_Dec 13 BCC (PDF) 10. Batch2__Transmittal Addendum_Stf.Rpt_w_Attach_10.20.16 (PDF) 11. Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (PDF) 12. BCCCOMPREH-60-1613884-1_NDN (PDF) 17.C Packet Pg. 1376 06/13/2017 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.C Doc ID: 3007 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve County-initiated amendments to the Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, to amend the Area of Critical State Concern overlay within the Future Land Use Element to provide for an agreement pursuant to Section 380.032(3) Florida Statutes; and to update and clarify text and correct map errors and omissions specifically amending the Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map; Stormwater Management Su b- Element of the Public Facilities Element to remove the discharge rates; Transportation Element and Transportation Map Series; and the Capital Improvement Element, for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for Review and Comments Response. (Adoption Hearing) (CPSP- 2013-11/PL20130002637) Meeting Date: 06/13/2017 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Senior – Zoning Name: Marcia R Kendall 05/09/2017 8:08 AM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 05/09/2017 8:08 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Division Reviewer Completed 05/09/2017 8:58 AM Growth Management Department David Weeks Additional Reviewer Completed 05/09/2017 1:56 PM Zoning Michael Bosi Additional Reviewer Completed 05/11/2017 7:41 AM Growth Management Department Marcia R Kendall Level 2 Division Administrator Skipped 04/03/2017 3:04 PM Growth Management Department James French Additional Reviewer Completed 05/11/2017 9:55 AM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 05/16/2017 11:33 AM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 05/16/2017 1:08 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 05/16/2017 2:25 PM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 05/31/2017 4:42 PM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 06/06/2017 12:19 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 06/13/2017 9:00 AM 17.C Packet Pg. 1377 17.C.1 Packet Pg. 1378 Attachment: Adoption Staff Report_CP-2013-11-FNL_w-signatures (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.1 Packet Pg. 1379 Attachment: Adoption Staff Report_CP-2013-11-FNL_w-signatures (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.1 Packet Pg. 1380 Attachment: Adoption Staff Report_CP-2013-11-FNL_w-signatures (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.1 Packet Pg. 1381 Attachment: Adoption Staff Report_CP-2013-11-FNL_w-signatures (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.1 Packet Pg. 1382 Attachment: Adoption Staff Report_CP-2013-11-FNL_w-signatures (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.1 Packet Pg. 1383 Attachment: Adoption Staff Report_CP-2013-11-FNL_w-signatures (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.1 Packet Pg. 1384 Attachment: Adoption Staff Report_CP-2013-11-FNL_w-signatures (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.1 Packet Pg. 1385 Attachment: Adoption Staff Report_CP-2013-11-FNL_w-signatures (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1386 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1387 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1388 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1389 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1390 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1391 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1392 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1393 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1394 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1395 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1396 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1397 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1398 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1399 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.2 Packet Pg. 1400 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CCME - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.3 Packet Pg. 1401 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CIE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.3 Packet Pg. 1402 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CIE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.3 Packet Pg. 1403 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CIE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.3 Packet Pg. 1404 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CIE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.3 Packet Pg. 1405 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CIE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.3 Packet Pg. 1406 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CIE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.3 Packet Pg. 1407 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption CIE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1408 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1409 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1410 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1411 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1412 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1413 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1414 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1415 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1416 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1417 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1418 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1419 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1420 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1421 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1422 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1423 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1424 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1425 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1426 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1427 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1428 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1429 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1430 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1431 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1432 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1433 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1434 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1435 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1436 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1437 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1438 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1439 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1440 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1441 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1442 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1443 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1444 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1445 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1446 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1447 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1448 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1449 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1450 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1451 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1452 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1453 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.4 Packet Pg. 1454 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption FLUE - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.5 Packet Pg. 1455 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption GG Area Master Plan FLUM - 0(1) (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.5 Packet Pg. 1456 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption GG Area Master Plan FLUM - 0(1) (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.5 Packet Pg. 1457 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption GG Area Master Plan FLUM - 0(1) (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.5 Packet Pg. 1458 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption GG Area Master Plan FLUM - 0(1) (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.5 Packet Pg. 1459 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption GG Area Master Plan FLUM - 0(1) (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.6 Packet Pg. 1460 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Stormwater - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.6 Packet Pg. 1461 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Stormwater - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.6 Packet Pg. 1462 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Stormwater - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.6 Packet Pg. 1463 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Stormwater - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.6 Packet Pg. 1464 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Stormwater - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1465 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1466 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1467 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1468 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1469 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1470 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1471 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1472 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1473 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1474 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1475 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1476 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1477 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1478 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1479 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1480 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1481 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1482 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1483 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.7 Packet Pg. 1484 Attachment: Ordinance - Adoption Transportation - 050217 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) - 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve County-initiated amendments to the Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, to amend the Area of Critical State Concern overlay within the Future Land Use Element to provide for an agreement pursuant to Section 380.032(3) Florida Statutes; and to update and clarify text and correct map errors and omissions specifically amending the Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map; Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element to remove the discharge rates; Transportation Element and Transportation Map Series; and the Capital Improvement Element, for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for Review and Comments Response. (Transmittal Hearing) (PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11) OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to approve several individual staff- initiated amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO). CONSIDERATIONS:  Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government’s adopted Growth Management Plan.  The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the “local planning agency” under Chapter 163.3174, F.S. and the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC), held their Transmittal hearings for petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 on July 7, 2016 and October 20, 2016.  This is the Transmittal hearing for these out of Cycle, staff-proposed amendments to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series, Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map, Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facility Element, Transportation Element and Transportation Map Series, and the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. The amendments that are the subject of this hearing are limited in scope primarily to those directed by the Board following the adoption of 2011 EAR-based GMP amendments and previous batch GMP amendments. Though not necessarily recommended by specific reference in the EAR, these mostly general updating and “housecleaning” amendments seek to add clarity, correct text and map errors or omissions, provide harmony and internal consistency among components of the Plan, and so forth. A specific set of changes to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Overlays and Special Features Section follow from Board direction to amend Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) Overlay provisions. Another small number of these staff-initiated changes are associated with recent amendments proposed for or adopted in the Land Development Code (LDC), changes in the 2014 or 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR), or with changes in State or Federal regulations, and to revise format, structure and language to follow other Board directives. Further explanation and staff analysis is provided in the CCPC Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts to Collier County result from this amendment, as this approval is for the Transmittal of this proposed amendment. However, the costs associated with legal advertising/public notice for the public hearings are borne by the County. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of these proposed amendments by the Board for Transmittal and their submission to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity will commence the Department’s sixty (60)-day state coordinated review process and ultimately return these amendments to the CCPC and the Board for final Adoption hearings to be held in 2017. 17.C.9 Packet Pg. 1485 Attachment: Batch 2 Transmtl ExecSumm_Dec 13 BCC (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) - 2 - LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality. A majority vote of the Board is needed for adoption of the Resolution and transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic (DEO). [HFAC] COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL: That the EAC forward proposed revisions to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) and the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) found in Petition CPSP-2013- 11 to the CCPC with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the Planning Commission, sitting as the EAC, forward proposed revisions to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) and the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) found in Petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 to the Board with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the Planning Commission forward Petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 to the Board with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, subject to a change to the ACSC Overlay in the FLUE made at their October 20th meeting – to withdraw that portion of the amendment noted in the Staff Report Addendum that proposed to provide for a variance to be applicable to certain essential services uses and instead replace that with an allowance for agreements pursuant to Chapter 380.032(3), F.S. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition at their July 7, 2016 and October 20, 2016 meetings. There were no public speakers to this item on July 7. One person spoke to this item on October 20, with remarks focused predominantly on ACSC provisions – and expressed support for staff’s replacement language regarding agreements per Florida Statute. The CCPC forwarded petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 to the Board with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, as presented by staff (vote: 5/0), subject to revisions to the Future Land Use, Capital Improvement, Conservation and Coastal Management, and Transportation Elements; these revisions are mostly reflected in the Addendum for the October 20 CCPC meeting and all CCPC-recommended revisions are reflected in Resolution Exhibit “A”. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: Same as the CCPC’s recommendation – to transmit petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity subject to all revisions recommended by the CCPC. Prepared by: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, and David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division, Growth Management Department 17.C.9 Packet Pg. 1486 Attachment: Batch 2 Transmtl ExecSumm_Dec 13 BCC (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Agenda Item 9.E ‒ 1 ‒ ADDENDUM to STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 20, 2016 RE: PETITION NO. PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11, STAFF-PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES, AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] Modifications have been made, per CCPC discussion and consensus at the July 7 CCPC hearing, to portions of the Transmittal Resolution Exhibit “A.” These changes are denoted and briefly explained below. No changes were discussed to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map or Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element, and these portions of the Transmittal Resolution Exhibit “A” are unchanged from their July 7 versions. Also, one new provision is added to the FLUE, an allowance for variance to the Area of Critical State Concern regulations for certain essential services. The added text and explanation/justification is provided within the FLUE portion of this report (pages 3-5). Formatting explanation: Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted – as presented to CCPC on 7/7/16. Words double underlined are added; words double struck through are deleted – per 7/7/16 meeting. CCME: Policies 7.1.2(2), 7.1.2(2)(a), and 7.1.2(2)(c): Include a public awareness program for new preserves as part of habitat management plans for listed species and other protected species, to educate residents about preserves within their developments and the need to maintain the habitat within preserves, as follows (for multiple species, not just scrub jay): Policy 7.1.2: (2) Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species and for those protected species identified below shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated indicates listed species or the protected species identified below are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Management plans for new preserves shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain habitat within the preserve for listed species and those protected species identified below. 17.C.10 Packet Pg. 1487 Attachment: Batch2__Transmittal Addendum_Stf.Rpt_w_Attach_10.20.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Agenda Item 9.E ‒ 2 ‒ (a) Management plans for new preserves shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species, and those protected species identified below, and their habitat from the negative impacts of proposed development. Developments shall be clustered to discourage impacts to listed species habitats. Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses, and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** (c) Habitat preservation plans for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) are required and shall conform to the guidelines contained in Technical Report No. 8, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. The required management plan shall also provide for a maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. The plan shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain the scrub vegetation. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. Coincides with similar changes in the FLUE. Policy 10.5.1: Clarify the type of recreation which is compatible with the natural functions of beaches and dunes on undeveloped shorelines; providing context within the Policies supporting Objective 10.5, as follows: Policy 10.5.1: Passive Rrecreation that is compatible with the natural functions of beaches and dunes is shall be regarded as the highest and best land use. Policy 10.5.4: Provide clarity regarding the scope of prohibited structures, as follows (change “shall” to “may”): Policy 10.5.4: The County shall may pProhibit construction of any structure seaward of the Coastal Construction Setback Line. Exceptions shall be allowed for passive recreational structures, access crossovers, and where enforcement would not allow any reasonable economic utilization of such property. In the latter event, require construction that shall minimizes interference with natural functions of such beaches and dunes. Policy 12.1: Remove redundancy and correctly identify the agency name, as follows: OBJECTIVE 12.1: Maintain hurricane evacuation clearance times as required by state law. An evacuation clearance time shall be is defined as having residents and visitors in an appropriate refuge away from storm surge prior to the arrival of sustained Tropical Storm force winds, i.e., winds equal to or greater than 39 mph. To further this oObjective, for future mobile home developments located outside of the storm surge zone, such development shall is to include on-site sheltering or retro-fitting of an adjacent facility. The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall continues to seek 17.C.10 Packet Pg. 1488 Attachment: Batch2__Transmittal Addendum_Stf.Rpt_w_Attach_10.20.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Agenda Item 9.E ‒ 3 ‒ opportunities to increase shelter facilities and associated capacities under the direction of the Department of the Florida Division of Emergency Management. CIE: Policy 5.3 D., now 5.5 D.: Update/correct map references, as follows: Policy 5.3 5: D. The necessary facilities and services are under construction or under contract pursuant to a FDOT 5-Year Work Program and are consistent with the Collier County 2025 2040 Long Range Needs Plan or the 2030 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), as adopted by the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO); or FLUE: Objective 4 and Policy 4.1: Correct mid-sentence capitalization and clearly indicate requirements for planning “studies”, as follows: OBJECTIVE 4: Continually refine the Future Land Use Element through detailed planning in In order to improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development, Hhousing and urban design, the Future Land Use Element shall be continually refined through detailed planning. Future studies might address specific geographic or issue areas. All future studies must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan and further its intent. Policy 4.1: Planning studies must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan and further its intent, and may address specific geographic or issue areas. ACSC: To list of exotic plant species, delete an errant reference to multiple species (“spp.”) where the specific species is listed. Also, though the specific species name listed may, or may not, remain accurate, no change is made so as to be identical to that listed in State law. Substantively, and new to this petition, the following changes are made - all added text is at end of the ACSC Overlay: 1) As allowed by Rule Chapter 28-25, F.A.C., Land Planning – Part III Boundary and Regulations for Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, add provision for the Land Development Code (LDC) variance process to be applicable to ACSC regulations, and provide that the LDC will be amended, as necessary, within one year to implement this allowance; 2) limit the applicability of the variance to select essential services; 3) advise the reader that this variance allowance does not alter the allowable essential services beyond that provided for under the future land use designation and zoning; 4) for essential services directly related to development, limit the variance to that necessary to serve development as presently allowed by the GMP and zoning; 5) provide criteria – taken from the variance section of the LDC; 6) specify the particular ACSC regulations that are subject to the variance process; and, 7) as required by Ch. 28-25, provide that the variance can only be approved where the development is designed to have minimum adverse impacts. Staff did not originally include this variance provision because it was thought that the amendment needed to include significant parameters for the variance and there was not adequate time to do so; staff intended to bring this variance provision forward as a separate GMP amendment at a later time. However, based upon recent communications with the ACSC Review Team at the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO), staff is now of the opinion that the amendment proposed will be acceptable to DEO staff. 17.C.10 Packet Pg. 1489 Attachment: Batch2__Transmittal Addendum_Stf.Rpt_w_Attach_10.20.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Agenda Item 9.E ‒ 4 ‒ The genesis for this added text are three circumstances that have arisen over the past three or so years for different properties lying within the ACSC (and, some limitations are added to address concerns raised by DEO staff as they reviewed various drafts of this amendment). First, Everglades City needed to expand their water treatment plant located in Copeland that would have necessitated impacting wetlands. Ultimately, they were able to revise their proposed site plan so as not to run afoul of ACSC limitations. Second, the Seminole Tribe of Florida desires to develop a small site (1.84 acres) with an essential service/community center use that may impact wetlands and will exceed the 10% site alteration limitation. Third, the Lee County Electric Co-op needs to expand development on an existing power substation site that will exceed the 10% site alteration limitation and impact protected wetlands (site is 5.45 acres; development dates to 1974). None of these three scenarios promote, or result in, more development occurring in the ACSC beyond that already allowed by present future land use designations and zoning. Staff is of the opinion that all three circumstances are examples of where some relief to the stringent requirements of the ACSC regulations appear to be appropriate. Four of the essential services listed in the amendment may serve development and/or serve those travelling through the ACSC – police, fire, emergency medical services, communication towers. Therefore, staff does not propose that a variance for those facilities be limited to serving development as presently allowed by the existing GMP and zoning, whereas other essential services (water, gas, phone, electricity) are subject to such a limitation. Three variance criteria are proposed, each taken verbatim from LDC Sec. 9.04.03, Criteria For Variances. However, the LDC provides that these, and five other criteria, are standards for consideration by the CCPC in formulating a recommendation to the board of zoning appeals, and these criteria apply only to zoning numerical standards – setbacks, height, buffer dimensions, number of signs and parking spaces, etc. The LDC provides the CCPC with broad latitude in considering zoning variances. Staff proposes that at least one of the three criteria in the FLUE must be met in order for the variance to be granted and, of course, the variance is applicable to limitations in the ACSC regulations, not zoning standards. The variance would only apply to the three ACSC regulations that are most impacting/restricting to proposed development, as identified in the three examples cited above, and that are numerical standards (10% maximum site alteration limitation; 50% maximum of the site alteration area for non - permeable surface limitation; 100% limitation to alter or destroy specified plant species). Staff emphasizes that the types of essential service uses for which the variance would be applicable is limited, as reflected in the draft language; the amount of development (residential, commercial, etc.) allowed by existing zoning and FLUM designations, for which essential services might be needed, is limited for the vast majority of the ACSC – notable exceptions are a portion of the RLSA, Rural Lands Stewardship Area, and the Copeland Urban designated area; and, the vast majority of the ACSC land area is owned by various government agencies (90%), mostly for conservation purposes (e.g. Big Cypress National Preserve, Florida Panther NWR, Ten Thousand Islands NWR, Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park). The ACSC regulations were established over forty years ago. The stated purposes of the ACSC regulations, as expressed in Ch. 28-25, are: “to conserve and protect the natural, environmental and economic resources and the scenic beauty of the Big Cypress Area, including … ecologically related wetlands, estuarine fisheries, and the fresh water aquifer, and ecologically related areas. It is the further purpose of these regulations to provide a land and water management system that will preserve water quality, provide for the optimum utilization of the limited water resources of the area, facilitate orderly and well-planned development, and protect the health, welfare, safety and quality of life of the residents of the state.” Therefore, it is appropriate that any variance allowance be limited in scope so as not to undermine the purposes of the ASCS regulations. 17.C.10 Packet Pg. 1490 Attachment: Batch2__Transmittal Addendum_Stf.Rpt_w_Attach_10.20.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Agenda Item 9.E ‒ 5 ‒ A. Area of Critical State Concern Overlay *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** *** c. Soils exposed during site alteration shall be stabilized and retention ponds or performance equivalent structures or systems maintained in order to retain run off and siltation on the construction site. Restoration of vegetation to site alteration areas shall be substantially completed within 180 days following completion of a development. Re-vegetation shall be accomplished with pre-existing species or other suitable species except that undesirable exotic species shall not be replanted or propagated. Exotic Undesirable exotic species are listed below. Australian Pine - (Casuarina spp.) Bishopwood - (Bischofia javanica) Brazilian Pepper - (Shinus terebinthfolius) Melaleuca (cajeput) - (Melaleuca leucadendra spp.) *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** *** Formatting explanation for the following section only: Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted – as they appear in the Addendum to the Staff Report dated September 1, 2016. Words double underlined are added; words double struck through are deleted – per further revisions prepared for the October 20, 2016 CCPC. All Development Orders issued for projects within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern shall be rendered to the State of Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for review with the potential for appeal to the Administration Commission per Chapter 73C-44, Florida Administrative Code, "Community Planning, Development Order Requirements for Areas of Critical State Concern". In accordance with Chapter 28-25.011, F.A.C., the zoning variance procedure contained in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ord. No. 04 -41, as amended, shall be applicable to the ACSC Regulations. Within one year of the effective date of this amendment establishing the applicability of the variance procedure, the variance procedure and criteria in the Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended, as necessary, to address ACSC regulations. Any variance to the ACSC regulations shall be subject to the following restrictions: (a) A variance shall only be applicable to essential services consisting of those services and facilities necessary to promote and protect public health, safety and welfare, limited to the following: police; fire; emergency medical; all services designed and operated to provide water, sewer, gas, telephone, electricity, cable television or communications to the general public by providers that have been approved and authorized according to laws having appropriate jurisdiction. This shall not be deemed to allow such essential services uses where the underlying future land use designation or zoning designation does not allow such uses. (b) A variance shall only be granted pertaining to water, gas, telephone, or electricity where those essential service uses are designed to serve development as allowed by the growth management plan and zoning regulations in effect as of the date of adoption of this amendment [___, 2017]. (c) A variance shall only be granted if it is demonstrated that: there are special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved; or there are special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property 17.C.10 Packet Pg. 1491 Attachment: Batch2__Transmittal Addendum_Stf.Rpt_w_Attach_10.20.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Agenda Item 9.E ‒ 6 ‒ which is the subject of the variance request; or the variance, if granted, will be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure and which promote standards of health, sa fety, or welfare. (d) A variance shall only be applicable to the following three ACSC regulations: site alteration limitation of 10% of the total site size; installation of non-permeable surfaces limitation of 50% of the site alteration area; and, 100% limitation on altering or destroying specified mangrove trees and salt marsh grasses, by area. (e) (b) No variance shall be granted for any development within the ACSC unless such development is designed to have minimum adverse impact on the ACSC’s water storage capacity, surface water and estuarine fisheries. RLSA Policies 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3: Withdraw proposed changes to RLSA Overlay FSA, HSA and WRA acreage figures – to be reconsidered at a later date. Also withdraw the initially-proposed corrections to the “HAS” acronym to read “HSA” remain, as the acronym appears correctly in the adopting Ordinance [2002-54]. RLSA Policies 5.5.2., 5.5.2.a., and 5.5.2.c.: Include a public awareness program for new preserves as part of habitat management plans for listed species and other protected species, to educate residents about preserves within their developments and the need to maintain the habitat within preserves, as follows: Policy 5.5: 2. Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species and for those protected species identified below shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated indicates listed species or the protected species identified below are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Management plans for new preserves shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain habitat within the preserve for listed species and those protected species identified below. 2.a. Management plans for new preserves shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species, and those protected species identified below, and their habitats from the negative impacts of proposed development. Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors. 2.c. Habitat preservation plans for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) are required and shall conform to the guidelines contained in Technical Report No. 8, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. The required management plan shall also provide for a maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. The plan shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain the scrub vegetation. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS 17.C.10 Packet Pg. 1492 Attachment: Batch2__Transmittal Addendum_Stf.Rpt_w_Attach_10.20.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Agenda Item 9.E ‒ 7 ‒ South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. Coincides with similar changes in the CCME. Transportation Element: Objective 3 and Policy 3.5: Clarify the type of development agreements, studies, plans and programs; providing context within the Policies supporting Objective 3, as follows: OBJECTIVE 3: Provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights-of-way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program, Board approved development agreements, and/or the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO’s) adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, plans and programs. Policy 3.5: A. The County is considering the viability of a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP) ordinance and land development regulations that: 1. identify, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway network shown on the County’s Long Range Transportation Plan, and other Board approved development agreements, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO’s) adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, plans and programs; and *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** All of the above must be consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, agreements, plans and programs, and Chapter 336.02, Florida Statutes. Policy 5.5: Delete specific name of an agency so as to retain only a generic name reference, as follows: Policy 5.5: Commercial developments within the South US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification to the Transportation Planning Department County transportation planning agency (presently, the Transportation Planning Section of the Growth Management Department) that at least four (4) of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** An applicant seeking an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation through the certification mentioned above shall submit an application to the Transportation Division Administrator Manager of the County transportation planning agency (presently, the Transportation Planning Section of the Growth Management Department) on forms provided by the Division agency. Binding commitments to utilize any of the above techniques relied upon to obtain certification shall be required as a condition of development approval. Map TR-1: Remove I-75 interchange at Everglades Blvd.; add a note at bottom of map; and, make general map corrections. Map TR-2: Remove I-75 interchange at Everglades Blvd.; add a note at bottom of map; and, add to legend and map face an interchange study area. G:\CDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\CPSP-2013-11 Second Batch Amendments\aaa Batch.2 Materials fr Sept 01 CCPC\01aaa CPSP-13-11 Batch 2 Staff Rpt Add fr Oct 20 CCPC.docx dw/8-4-16; dw, mb, cs/10-7-16 17.C.10 Packet Pg. 1493 Attachment: Batch2__Transmittal Addendum_Stf.Rpt_w_Attach_10.20.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1494 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1495 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1496 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1497 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1498 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1499 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1500 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1501 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1502 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1503 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1504 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1505 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1506 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1507 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1508 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1509 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1510 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1511 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1512 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1513 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1514 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1515 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments Prepared by Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section May 26, 2015. YEAR POPULATION 2010 321,520 estimates 2011 323,785 estimates 2012 329,849 estimates 2013 333,663 estimates 2014 336,783 estimates 2015 343,200 projections 2016 349,541 projections 2017 356,000 projections 2018 362,578 projections 2019 369,277 projections 2020 376,100 projections 2021 382,068 projections 2022 388,130 projections 2023 394,288 projections 2024 400,544 projections 2025 406,900 projections 2026 412,447 projections 2027 418,069 projections 2028 423,768 projections 2029 429,545 projections 2030 435,400 projections sources: 1) U.S. Census Bureau 2) Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) at Univ. of FL. 3) Collier County Planning staff G:\CDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\CPSP-2013-11 Second Batch Amendments\A2A Batch.2 post-CAO Exhibits for CCPC_FINALS\01d CPSP-13-11 Batch.2 Staff Report attchmnt 3 by-dw/5-2015 4-2016 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1516 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a standalone Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment cycle to allow for the removal of the existing maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin from the GMP; in the interim, approve placing in abeyance the discharge rates in the GMP; and, authorize staff to initiate amendments to the Code of Laws and Ordinances and/or Land Development Code (LDC) to add stormwater discharge rates; and, approve a standalone LDC amendment cycle, if needed. OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) to authorize amendments to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to remove the existing maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin and modify, as needed, any GMP related references to those discharge rates for proper form and clarity; authorize placing in abeyance the discharge rates contained in the GMP; and, authorize amendments to the Code of Laws and Ordinances and/or Land Development Code, as appropriate, to add sixteen new maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin. CONSIDERATIONS: Background: The existing conveyance capacity of the County’s primary and secondary stormwater and surface water management system is limited. Expansion or enlargement of this system to create additional system capacity is not a viable strategy for managing stormwater flows. The Stormwater Management Subelement of the Growth Management Plan requires that drainage systems have adequate stormwater management capacity at the time development permit is issued, and the system be designed “to ensure that the final outlet point has the adequate capacity to handle all discharges from the upstream portion of the watershed under conditions present at the time of design.” Additionally, Policy 6.3 of the Subelement requires off-site discharge rates be computed using a storm event of a 3 day duration and 25 year return frequency. Analysis of the system’s capacity to accept flow and adequately convey it to downstream receiving waters resulted in the current maximum allowable post development discharge rates. Six (6) sub-basin areas presently have specified reduced maximum allowable post development discharge rates ranging from 0.04 to 0.13 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre; all other areas of the County have a maximum allowable post development discharge rate of 0.15 cfs per acre. These discharge rates are listed in the Code of Laws and Ordinances, Section 90-41. The Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP, adopted in 1989, required that the County develop a watershed management plan by January 1993. After postponement for several years, the Board of County Commissioners sponsored development of a comprehensive Collier County Watershed Management Plan (CCWMP) and accepted it in 2011. The unit discharge rates adopted in the earlier years were based on preliminary hydraulic analyses. Detailed hydraulic modeling for evaluation of the design storm conveyance capacity of the canal network performed as a part of the CCWMP updated the maximum allowable discharge rates for all of the basins. Two additional detailed stormwater management master plans, developed jointly by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the County for the Belle Meade and Immokalee areas in 2005, recommended further limiting the discharge rates for sixteen (16) basins/sub-basins. Computer modeling results indicated various segments of the system do not have the capacity to handle large storm events. In some cases, the canal banks would be overtopped during a 10-year design storm event. Conditions may worsen in the future unless management actions are implemented to control for the impact of subsequent changes to land use. Reducing maximum allowable post development discharge rates in these 16 basin areas is recommended to ensure adequate flood protection levels of service. 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1517 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Accordingly, amendments to existing ordinances, including the Stormwater Management Subelement are needed to meet the commitments of the GMP by incorporating the limiting discharge rates proposed in CCWMP and the two stormwater master plans. The following benefits are anticipated as a result: • Improved Levels of Service (LOS) for flood protection provided by SFWMD and County operated canals • Enhanced groundwater recharge potential • Restored hydrology and wetlands hydroperiod • Water quality improvement of receiving waters • Reduction of freshwater flows to the estuaries • Gain consistency in Environmental Resource Permitting (SFWMD and County). Based in part on the CCWMP, the County amended the Stormwater Management Subelement of the GMP by Ordinance No. 15-09 to add stormwater discharge rates for 14 sub-basins. However, some of these rates do not reflect the discharge rates contained within the studies for the Immokalee and Belle Meade areas, and need additional public vetting. Further, staff has confirmed with the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, the agency that oversees all local government comprehensive plans, that these discharge rates are not required to be adopted into the GMP. Removing the discharge rates from the GMP and instead incorporating them into the LDC and/or Code of Laws and Ordinances will allow for an amendment process, as future changes may be needed, that is faster, less costly and less cumbersome. Finally, staff has presented the proposed discharge rate reductions to the Development Services Advisory Committee (DSAC) on three occasions (6/3/15, 11/4/15, and 3/2/16) with assistance from the Big Cypress Basin of the South Florida Water Management District and the engineering consulting firm of Robau and Associates, LLC. Questions and comments were raised by DSAC members and at subsequent DSAC meetings staff and the consultant team responded to those. Moving forward, the DSAC will continue to review all proposed changes to the LDC and/or Code of Laws and Ordinances and provide comments and recommendations prior to review by the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for authorizing standalone GMPA and LDCA cycles, nor for placing in abeyance the discharge rates in the GMP. Costs associated with the text amendments will be accommodated in the current fiscal year budget. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: This item’s Growth Management Plan (GMP) impact consists of placing in abeyance the discharge rates listed in the Stormwater Subelement. Text revisions to the GMP will be provided to the Board at a subsequent hearing for review and approval. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality, and requires majority vote for Board approval. -- HFAC RECOMMENDATION: To approve a standalone Growth Management Plan amendment cycle to remove the existing maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin and modify, as needed, any GMP related references to those discharge rates for proper form and clarity; authorize placing in abeyance the discharge rates contained in the GMP; authorize staff to initiate amendments to the Code of Laws and Ordinances and/or Land Development Code (LDC) to add sixteen new maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin; and, approve a standalone LDC amendment cycle, if needed 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1518 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Prepared by: Michele R. Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Division, Growth Management Department and David C. Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Growth Management Department. Attachments: (1) Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates White Paper (2) Stormwater Management Sub-Element, Policy 6.3 (3) Code of Laws and ordinances, Section 90-41 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1519 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management Division Growth Management Department Page 1 of 6 Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates March 23, 2016 Executive Summary Since 1990 (Ord. 90-10), Collier County has had Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates. In most areas of the County, the maximum allowable post development discharge rate is 0.15 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre. There have been six (6) exception areas - areas (sub-basins) with rates more restrictive ranging from 0.04 to 0.13 cfs per acre. These more restrictive rates were established based on modeling studies demonstrating the need to further restrict the runoff rate from adjacent lands based in limited conveyance capacity of the receiving canals. Between 2006 and 2011, three (3) studies were completed which included recommendations to reduce discharge rates in sixteen (16) additional sub-basin areas. In order to proceed with implementation of adding these 16 additional reduced discharge rates, Stormwater Planning initiated a vetting process including a feasibility analysis to examine all the effects that could result should some or all of the additional reduced discharge rates be implemented. This process began in May 2015. Since May 2015, staff has presented this issue to DSAC three (3) times on June 3, 2015, November 4, 2015, and March 2, 2016, with assistance from BCB/SFWMD staff and the Engineering Consulting firm of Robau & Associates, LLC (R&A). Many related issues have been discussed with DSAC. The following is a list of some key issues with staff comments. 1. Currently Built-Out Basins: Some of the areas where new restrictions are proposed are in basins that are principally built out. Why are you proposing implementation in these areas? Staff: Limited canal conveyance capacity is still relevant in these areas. Redevelopment potential is high in older built out areas. Opportunities to decrease runoff at the source will play a key role in ensuring adequate flood protection level of service (LOS). 2. Economic Analysis: What is the cost increase to developers that will result when adhering to more restrictive discharge rates? Staff: With DSAC’s approval and understanding of the worst- case scenario - a high intensity commercial development, R&A completed a detailed analysis and presented it on March 2, 2016. The cost increase as analyzed was approximately 2% of the total site work. The additional cost is due to additional fill. 3. Affected Areas: Every basin should be checked. Staff: Detailed maps of each affected basin are being produced using high-level GIS analysis. These maps will show explicit basin boundaries and current land use with the potentially affected area (remaining undeveloped parcels) quantified by area (acres) and by percent of total basin area. 4. Incentives, Vested Rights, etc.: Other related land development regulations should be examined for possible changes that could offset this proposed higher regulatory standard. Staff: Issues such as redevelopment thresholds, vested future development rights (permitted but not 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1520 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management Division Growth Management Department Page 2 of 6 yet built), Low Impact Development (LID) source control initiatives, relaxed parking lot drive aisle elevation requirements, berm side slopes, and buffers are some examples of incentives for consideration that will be examined during this vetting process. Our next step is to seek Board approval to begin the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and Land Development Code (LDC) amendment process. We anticipate going back to DSAC two (2) more times and to the CCPC three (3) times as part of the transmittal and adoption hearings. Staff is recommending removal of the discharge rates from the GMP with insertion into either the Code of Laws and Ordinances or the Land Development Code. Unfortunately, during the 2011 Ear-Based GMP Amendment Cycle which was originated to revise format, structure and language for internal consistency, additional restricted discharge rates as recommended by the Watershed Management Plan (WMP) were prematurely adopted by the BCC as part of the 2015 glitch amendments. Staff will bring an executive summary to the BCC on April 26, 2016 to request that the additional restricted discharge rates be placed in abeyance until the vetting process is complete. Our professional team working on the initiative consists of Jerry Kurtz, Ananta Nath, Robert Wiley, Michele Mosca, Liz Gosselin, Jin Xue, Joss De Lestang and Emilio Robau. Monthly County/BCB/SFWMD coordination meetings include regular progress updates on this issue insuring consistent understanding of regulatory application upon final approval and implementation. Background The following information includes an explanation of the history of the issue, the current need for the change, the areas that will be impacted should such an amendment be approved and the steps in the amendment process. 1. Surface Water Management and Maximum Allowable Discharge Rates The existing conveyance capacity of the County’s primary and secondary stormwater and surface water management system is limited. Expansion or enlargement of this system to create additional system capacity is not a viable strategy for managing this issue. Previously completed analysis of the system’s capacity to accept flow and adequately convey it to downstream receiving waters resulted in the current maximum allowable post development discharge rates. Subsequent and more recent analysis has been completed and the results indicate that sixteen (16) additional basins should have reduced maximum allowable post development discharge rates. Computer modeling results indicate that various segments of the system do not have the capacity to handle large storm events. In some cases, the canal banks are overtopped even during the 10-year design storm event. Conditions would worsen in the future unless management actions are implemented to control for the impact of subsequent changes to land use. 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1521 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management Division Growth Management Department Page 3 of 6 Reducing maximum allowable post development discharge rates in these identified areas is one of the most prudent actions recommended to insure adequate flood protection levels of service. 2. Stormwater Management Discharge Rate Restriction History 1974 – Ordinance 74-50 Establishes Collier County Water Management Policy and implements local design criteria. 1982 – South Florida Water Management District establishes Pre-development verses Post- development matching discharge design criteria. 1989 – Collier County adopted its first Growth Management Plan (Ord. 89-05) requiring the County to develop a Collier County Watershed Management Plan by 1993. 1990 – Ordinance 90-10 Established additional design criteria, and discharge limitations for four (4) basins including a 0.15 cfs/acre global restriction for the rest of Collier County. 2001 – Ordinance 01-27 further updated the allowable discharge rates, added two (2) additional basins, and other design criteria. 2007 – DCA pushes Collier County to fulfill the 1989 Comprehensive plan commitments and County adopts interim watershed regulations through a Growth Management Plan Amendment (Ord. 07-16). 3. Basins with Specific Discharge Rates Currently there are a total of six (6) basins with specified reduced maximum allowable post development discharge rates ranging from 0.04 to 0.13 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre. In all other areas of the County the maximum allowable post development discharge rate is 0.15 cfs per acre. Discharge rates are computed using a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year return frequency. The current list of basins with specified maximum allowable post development discharge rates can be found in Policy 6.3 of Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP), Public Facilities Element, Drainage Sub- Element. This list can also be found in Ordinances 2001-27 and 2007-11, as well as on the County Stormwater Management web page. 4. Growth Management Code References The fourth paragraph of the introduction of the GMP, Public Facilities Element, Drainage Sub-Element, states that “the stormwater management system has to be designed so as to ensure that the final outlet point has adequate capacity to handle all discharges from the upstream portion of the watershed under conditions present at the time of design“. Policy 1.2 of the GMP, Public Facilities Element, Drainage Sub-Element, states that procedures and projects will be designed and implemented in a manner to ensure that adequate stormwater management facility capacity is available at the time a development permit is issued or that such capacity will be available when needed to serve the development. 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1522 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management Division Growth Management Department Page 4 of 6 Goal 2, Objective 2.1., interim standard d, of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element states that limiting discharge rates will be reviewed as part of the Watershed Management Plans and modified accordingly to the analysis and findings of the plans. 5. Basis (Analysis) for Proposed Amendment Four (4) of the recommended maximum allowable post development discharge rates are based on two (2), 2006 completed stormwater management master plans, the Belle Meade Area Stormwater Master Plan and the Immokalee Area Stormwater Master Plan. The remainder of the recommended maximum allowable post development discharge rates are based on analysis completed as part of the Watershed Management Plan (2011). Belle Meade Area Stormwater Management Master Plan From page 4-21 of the Belle Meade Area Stormwater Management Master Plan, by Parsons Inc., dated September 2006, “The Belle Meade Basin allowable discharge rates were determined from the study’s model results for the 25-year, 3-day design storm”. The allowable discharge represents baseline conditions and is needed to maintain flood protection level of service when future land use modifications are proposed. In establishing an allowable discharge by watershed the Belle Meade model area was divided into two watersheds separated by Sabal Palm Road. The peak 25-Year, 3-day flow from the two watersheds will be divided by the total respective area to determine the allowable discharge. This method, approved by SFWMD personnel, is simple to administer and is consistent with the Environmental Resources Permit Information Manual (Volume IV, 2000) developed by SFWMD Environmental Resources Regulation Division. This method determines the allowable discharge for grouped sub basins and not by individual sub basins.” Immokalee Area Stormwater Master Plan The limiting unit discharge rates of 0.05 and 0.10 cfs/acre respectively, for the areas east and west of State Road 29 in Immokalee were developed from the outputs of the Stormwater Management Model (XPSWMM) runs of the Immokalee Master Plan project. These rates, were however, not documented in the Master Plan report. The model results were subsequently reviewed and summarized by staff from the South Florida Water Management District Big Cypress Basin office after the report was published. The model inputs/outputs are available in SFWMD files and can be reviewed if further verification is needed. Watershed Management Plan The Watershed Management Plan (WMP) was accepted by the Board of County Commissioners on December 13, 2011. One of the efforts involved in completing the plan included a computer generated hydraulic conveyance analysis. MIKE SHE / MIKE 11 computer model results determined the maximum flow that can be conveyed by the various water management canal segments. Results indicated that various segments of the primary and secondary water management systems do not have the capacity to handle large storm events. As previously stated, in some cases, the canal banks are overtopped even 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1523 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management Division Growth Management Department Page 5 of 6 during the 10-year design storm event. Conditions would worsen in the future unless management actions are implemented to control for the impact of new development. A detailed description of the analysis is provided in the Surface Water Quantity Assessment section in Volume 4 of the WMP. To check the current allowed maximum discharges, as required by the County ordinance, the maximum flow predicted by the computer model was divided by the extent of the drainage area to obtain the actual maximum allowable discharge rate associated with each canal segment. It was found that maximum discharges for many of the County basins needed updating. That was expected because the original limits were based on preliminary analyses. Page 11 of Volume 3 of the WMP includes Table 3-3, a list of the recommended maximum allowable discharge rates for additional basins. Fourteen (14) basins are identified for recommended modification. Below are three clarifications in reference to this table. (1) Table 3-3 listed the Harvey Canal Basin twice, once as the Harvey Canal Basin and second as the Island Walk Basin. It is the same basin and the correct name is the Harvey Basin. Its discharge rate has been previously set based on the Harvey Basin Master Plan and is currently addressed in Ordinance 2001-27. No changes to this basin’s rate are necessary. (2) Table 3-3 references the Henderson Creek Basin. This basin is the same as the Belle Meade Basin. The source for consideration of this basin’s discharge rate modification will be the Belle Meade Stormwater Master Plan (BMSMP). The BMSMP split the basin into two parts using Sable Palm Road as the dividing line. (3) Table 3-3 indicates that no modification is recommended to the Upper Immokalee Basin. Modifications for the Immokalee area basins will be considered using the analysis completed by the Immokalee Area Stormwater Master Plan. This master plan split the basin in half using State Road 29 as the dividing line. 6. The Basins and Discharge Rates Current Six Specific Discharge Limitation Basins Rate 1. Airport Road North Sub-Basin (North of Vanderbilt Beach Road) 0.04 cfs/acre 2. Airport Road South Sub-basin (South of Vanderbilt Beach Road) 0.06 cfs/acre 3. Cocohatchee Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre 4. Lely Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre 5. Harvey Basin 0.055 cfs/acre (Recommend amending/rounding this off to 0.06 cfs/acre) 6. Wiggins Pass Basin 0.13 cfs/acre 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1524 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management Division Growth Management Department Page 6 of 6 Proposed Additional Basins 1. Henderson Creek Belle Meade Basin (North of Sabal Palm Rd.) 0.06 cfs/acre * 2. Henderson Creek Belle Meade Basin (South of Sabal Palm Road) 0.04 cfs/acre *(Belle Meade MP recommended 0.0375 cfs/acre; recommending rounding to hundredths.) 3. Immokalee Master Plan Area (East of SR 29) 0.05 cfs/acre 4. Immokalee Master Plan Area (West of SR 29) 0.10 cfs/acre 5. CR 951 North Canal Basin 0.11 cfs/acre * 6. C4 Basin 0.11 cfs/acre 7. Corkscrew Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre * 8. Cypress Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre * 9. Faka Union Canal Basin (North of I-75) 0.09 cfs/acre * 10. Gordon River Extension Basin 0.09 cfs/acre 11. I-75 Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre * 12. Imperial Drainage Outlet Basin 0.12 cfs/acre 13. Lely Manor Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre 14. Main Golden Gate Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre * 15. Palm River Canal Basin 0.13 cfs/acre 16. Pine Ridge Canal Basin 0.13 cfs/acre * Basins with final outfall to SFWMD/BCB operated canals (8 of 16). 7. Benefits Improved Levels of Service (LOS) for flood protection provided by South Florida Water Management District and Collier County operated canals Enhanced Groundwater Recharge Improved Hydrology and wetlands hydro-period Reduce Pollution by Source Capture Water Quality Improvement of receiving waters Reduction of freshwater flows to the estuaries Gain consistency in Environmental Resource Permitting (SFWMD and County) Fulfill Growth Management Plan Commitments 8. Review and Approval Process Staff is proceeding with BCC approval to begin the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and Land Development Code (LDC) amendment process to remove the existing maximum allowable off-site discharge rates by basin from the GMP; adding the existing six discharge rates and sixteen (16) new discharge rates to the LDC. This process is anticipated to take up to a year and a half. Staff anticipates returning to DSAC two (2) more times with prepared amendments for transmittal and adoption hearings. Issues such as redevelopment thresholds, vested future development rights (permitted but not yet built), and possible incentives for consideration will be examined during this process. Attachments: March 2, 2016 DSAC Meeting PowerPoint Presentation 17.C.11 Packet Pg. 1525 Attachment: Batch2_Transmittal_Staff.Rpt_w_Attach_7.7.16 (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) 17.C.12 Packet Pg. 1526 Attachment: BCCCOMPREH-60-1613884-1_NDN (3007 : Batch #2 In-House GMP Amendments - Adoption) RESOLUTION NO. 16-2 8 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING COUNTY-INITIATED AMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, TO AMEND THE AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN OVERLAY WITHIN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO PROVIDE FOR AN AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.032(3) FLORIDA STATUTES; AND TO UPDATE AND CLARIFY TEXT AND CORRECT MAP ERRORS AND OMISSIONS SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB- ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT TO REMOVE THE DISCHARGE RATES; TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES; AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Collier County staff has prepared amendments to the following elements of its Growth Management Plan: Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map; Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; Transportation Element and Transportation Map Series; 15-CMP-00954] 317 Page 1 of 3 Batch#2 GMP Transmittal Amendments 10/24/16 Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Capital Improvement Element and WHEREAS, on October 20, 2016, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed EAR-based amendments to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, Florida Statutes, and has recommended approval of said amendments to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing approved the transmittal of the proposed amendments to the Growth Management Plan to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty(30) days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty(180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendments, prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION adopted after motion, second and majority vote this 13 day of CSL -y t r , 2016. 15-CMP-00954] 317 Page 2 of 3 Batch#2 GMP Transmittal Amendments 10/24/16 Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions AG ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA jut, juteit. .... BY: @st as t ajfm efuty Clerk ONNA FIALA, Chairman sigrfrply: Approved as to form and legality: LtiL X19 Heidi Ashton-Cicko I' Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—Text and Maps 15-CMP-00954] 317 Page 3 of 3 Batch#2 GMP Transmittal Amendments 10/24/16 Words underlined are additions; Words Gtruck through are deletions cao Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 EXHIBIT "A" CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (CCME) Update and make current the Table of Contents, along with corresponding titles, heading and other entries— inside and between Elements—to maximize internal consistency. II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES GOAL 1: Reference text only, page 3] TO PLAN FOR THE PROTECTION, CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT AND APPROPRIATE USE OF THE COUNTY'S NATURAL RESOURCES. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Revised text, page 3] Continue to m Maintain a comprehensive environmental management and conservation program to ensure that natural resources, including State and Federally listed animal species within the County are properly, appropriately, and effectively identified, managed, and protected. Policy 1.1.1: Collier County has established and will maintains an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC), which advises and assists the appropriate County agencies, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) in implementing the County's environmental resources management programs. Policy 1.1.2: Collier County has incorporated the gGoals, eObjectives and pPolicies of this Conservation and Coastal Management Element... text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.3.1: Revised text, page 4] The NRPA program shall direct incompatible land uses away from significant environmental systems that exist at a landscape scale, contain large systems of connected wetland and upland habitats, and support a wide variety of listed species. The program shall include the following: a. Identification and mapping of NRPAs as an overlay to the Future Land Use Map; (During the Assessment for the Rural Fringe area, the County has determined that CREW Trust lands, Belle Meade, and a portion of the Northern Belle Meade shall be identified as NRPAs. The County also has determined that the South Golden Gate Estates is a NPRA. The specific boundaries have been identified as NRPAs on the Future Land Use Map.) text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.3.2 Revised text, page 5] The overall purpose and description of the Rural Stewardship program is defined in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) Overlay found in the in the Future Land Use Element. A Stewardship Credit system has been established that shall serve as the primary basis for the protection of Flowway Stewardship Areas (FSAs), Habitat Stewardship Areas (HSAs) and Water Retention Areas (WRAs). The RLSA Overlay also contains policies to that shall direct incompatible land uses away from FSAs, HSAs and WRAs in order to protect wetlands, upland habitats and listed species within the RLSA. text break *** *** *** *** *** Page 1 o DRAFT Words underlined are added;words ctruck through are deleted. 1 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 OBJECTIVE 2.1: Revised text, page 6] text break *** *** *** *** * a. All new development and re-development projects shall meet 150% of the water quality volumetric requirements of Section 4.2.1(a) of the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume II for use within the Geographic Limits of the South Florida Water Management District (2014), or its successor, in effect at the time of project approval, and the retention and detention requirements, and the allowable off-site discharge rates required by 1...e-•• - -- - ••-- 'e . c. •- 0.-, - e-- ' provided in the Land Development Code; text break *** *** ** *** ** d. All development located within areas identified on Figure 1 shall be evaluated to... avoid direct impacts to these natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs or, when not possible, to ensure any direct impact is minimized and compensated for by providing the same conveyance capacity lost by the direct impact. The County shall adhere to the limiting discharge rates of each basin as outlined in Ordinance 2001 27, adopted May 22, 2001 which amended the County Water Management Policy and provided basin delineations where special p ak discharge ratcc have been established. The limiting discharge rates will be reviewed as a part of the Watershed Management Plans, and modified according to the analyses and findings of the Watershed Management Plans as provided in the Land Development Code. text break ** *** *** *** *** Policy 2.3.6.b: Revised text, page 9] b. Excluding single family homes, any project impacting five (5) acres or more of wetlands shall provide... text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 3.1.4: Revised text, page 11] Wellhead protection areas identified on the Future Land Use Map Series shall be protected as follows: 1. Wellhead protection areas shall consist of four (4) Wellfield Risk Management Zones defined as follows: a) Zone W-1 is the land area surrounding the identified potable water wellfield wellheads and extends to the five percent (5%) ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the one (1) year ground water travel time to the wellfield). b) Zone W-2 is the land area between the W-1 boundary line and the ten percent (10%) ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the two (2) year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). c) Zone W-3 is the land area between the W-2 boundary line and the twenty-five percent (25%) ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the five (5)year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). d) Zone W-4 is the land area between the W-3 boundary line and the 1-98 one-hundred percent 100%) ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the twenty (20) year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). 2. Land uses are restricted within the wellfield risk management zones as follows: a) Future solid waste disposal facilities: are prohibited in all wellfield risk management zones. b) Future solid waste transfer stations; are prohibited in zones W-1, W-2, and 3. , DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted.2 1 AC. Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 c) Future solid waste storage, collection, and recycling storing hazardous products and hazardous wastes;are prohibited in zones W-1, W-2, and W-3. d) Future non-residential uses involving hazardous products in quantities exceeding 250 liquid gallons or 1,000 pounds of solids; must provide for absorption or secondary containment in zones W-1, W-2, and W-3. e) Future domestic wastewater treatment plants; are prohibited in zone W-1. f) Future land disposal systems; must meet high level disinfection standards as found in Title 40 CFR part 135. g) Land application of domestic residuals; are required to limit metal concentrations;initrogen based on uptake ability of vegetation), and require a Wellfield eConditional uUse. 1 1 A Future on-site disposal systems (septic tanks) requiring a soil absorption area greater than 1,000 square feet are allowed to discharge in zone W-1 subject to complying with construction standards and provision of an automatic dosing device and a low-pressure lateral distribution. j f On-site sewage disposal systems (septic tanks) serving existing industrial uses and subject to the thresholds in d) and e) above within wellfield zones W-1, W-2, and W-3 shall are required to meet all construction and operating standards contained in 64E-10, F.A.C. as the rule existed on August 31, 1999 and shall to implement a ground water monitoring plan. 3. Wellfield Conditional uses referenced within this pPolicy... text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 3.3.2: Revised text, page 13] Collier County shall use its three-dimensional computer model to calculate the actual "cones of depression" around the County's existing potable water wellfields. After at least 15 days publication of the maps of the proposed "zones of protection"for each such wellfield before each hearing by the EAC, Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners, the County shall then amend the appropriate elements of this Growth Management Plan to show such "cones of depression" as "zones of protection" within the Countywide Future Land Use Map Series. text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 4.2: Revised text, page 14] Continue to promote conservation of Collier County's potable water supply and will continue to develop, implement and refine a comprehensive conservation strategy through the Collier County Water-Sewer District and the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority, which will—identify identifies specific goals for reducing per capita potable water consumption. text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 5.4: Revised text, page 16] The County shall m Maintain its the County's program to control soil erosion through its regulations identifying criteria to control and reduce soil erosion and sediment transport from construction and other nonagricultural land disturbing activities. text break *** *** *** *** *** Page 3 of jZ DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck-through are deleted.3 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 GOAL 6: Reference text only, page 16] TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE THE COUNTY'S NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. OBJECTIVE 6.1: Revised text, page 16] Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. The Policies under this Objective shall apply to all of Collier County except for that portion of the County which is identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay.) Policy 6.1.1: For the County's Urban Designated Area... pursuant to pPolicies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element. ... text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 17] 1) For the purpose of this pPolicy, ...specified in this pPolicy... 2) The preservation of... 3) Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of this pPolicy shall be set aside... consistent with the requirements of this pPolicy. 4) Selection of native vegetation to be... a. Wetland or upland areas... the requirements of Policy 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 of this eElement. text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 18] 5) The uses allowable within preserve areas are limited to: a. ...standards that implement this pPolicy shall be... b. ...according to the pPolicies associated with Objective 7.1. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.1.2: text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 22] 1) For the purpose of this pPolicy... specified in this pPolicy... text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 22] 3) Areas that fulfill ...the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of this pPolicy... consistent with ...the requirements of this pPolicy. ... 4) a. ...the requirements of Policy 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 of this eElement. 5) b. ...according to the pPolicies associated with Objective 7.1... text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 23] 8) ...required in this pPolicy... 10) ...pursuant to Policy 6.5.2 of this eElement. ...in CCME Objective 6.5 of this eElement. Page `f of DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck rough are deleted.4 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.1.5: Revised text, page 24] in Policies 6.1.1, and 6.1.2 of this eElement... ...the requirements of Policy 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 of this eElement... text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.1.9: Revised text, page 25] the pPolicies supporting Objective 6.1. OBJECTIVE 6.2: the appropriate pPolicies under Goal 6. (The County's wetland protection policies and strategies shall-be are coordinated with the Watershed Management Plans as required by Objective 2.1 of this Element.) text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.2.5: Revised text, page 29] of Policy 6.1.2 of this eElement... This pPolicy shall be implemented... 1) ...of Policy 6.1.2 of this eElement... a. The acreage requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this eElement shall be met be l preserving... ...in paragraph (2) of this pPolicy. ...This pPolicy is... ...by Policy 6.1.2 of this eElement. ...by Policy 6.1.2 of this eElement. text break *** *** *** *** *** 3) ...of paragraph (6) of this pPolicy. 4) ...within Policy 6.2.7 of this eElement. text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 31] 6)a.4. ...with paragraphs (6)a.1, (6)a.2, and (6)a.3 of this pPolicy ...with this pPolicy... 6)a.5. ...the requirements of Policy 6.2.7 of this eElement. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.2.6 Revised text, page 31] in Policy 6.2.5(5)d of this eElement... Policy 6.2.7: Revised text, page 32] This pPolicy shall be implemented as follows: 2) ...pursuant to pPolicies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element... 3) ...pursuant to pPolicies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element... text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.2.9: Revised text, page 33] the pPolicies supporting Objective 6.2. OBJECTIVE 6.3: Revised text, page 33] The County shall p Protect and conserve submerged marine habitats. text break *** *** *** *** *** Page 5 of_ 1 T DRAFT Words underlined are added;words strup gh are deleted. 5 cAq Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 OBJECTIVE 6.4: Revised text, page 33] The County will p Protect, conserve and appropriately use ecological communities shared with or tangential to State and Federal lands and other local governments. text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 6.5: Revised text, page 33] The County shall p Protect natural reservations from the impact of surrounding development. For the purpose of this Objective and its related pPolicies:t natural reservations shall include only Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPAs)and designated Conservation Lands on the Future Land Use Map_; and, development shall Such development includes all projects except for permitting and construction of single-family dwelling units situated on individual lots or parcels. This Objective and its Policies shaft apply only to the Rural Fringe Mixed Use 4District [except as noted in Policy 6.5.3 below]. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.5.2: Revised text, page 34] The following criteria shall apply to development contiguous to natural reservations in order to reduce negative impacts to the natural reservations: 1) d. ...in Policy 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 of this eElement. text break *** *** *** *** *** 3) Within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, ...as specified in Section 4.2.2(b), of the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume II for use within the Geographic Limits of the South Florida Water Management District(2014), or its successor. 4) Proposed development ...projects shall be designed in accordance with Sections 3.10, 10.2.2.4 of the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume I, and Sections 3.11 and 3.12 of the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume ll for use within the Geographic Limits of the South Florida Water Management District(2014), or its successor. text break *** *** *** *** *** GOAL 7: TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE THE COUNTY'S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. OBJECTIVE 7.1: Reference text only, page 36] Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats... Policy 7.1.1: Revised text, page 36] text break *** *** *** *** *** 6) All other pPolicies supporting Objective 7.1 of this eElement. Policy 7.1.2: Revised text, page 37] text break *** *** *** *** *** 2) Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species and for those protected species identified below shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated indicates listed species or the protected species identified below are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Management plans for new preserves shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain habitat within the preserve for listed species and those protected species identified below. Page (e of i9 DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted. 6 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 a) Management plans for new preserves shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species, and those protected species identified below, and their habitat from the negative impacts of proposed development. Developments shall be clustered to discourage impacts to listed species habitats. Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses, and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors. text break :t** *** ** *** *** 2)(a)2. ...subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this pPolicy. 3. ...contained in Policy 6.1.1 and Policy 6.1.2 of this eElement. The County shall also consider the recommendations of other agencies, subject to the provisions of paragraph 3) of this pPolicy. b) For parcels containing gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), priority shall be given habitat management plans are required and shall give priority to protecting the largest most contiguous gopher tortoise habitat with the greatest number of active burrows, and for providing a connection to off site adjacent gopher tortoise preserves. c) Habitat preservation plans for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) are required andshall - - •- - e-':- •-- . . --. - - -- - -- e. Z, . . e provide for a maintenance program and specify as appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. -- - . . . - e. •- - ... educate residents about the on site preserve and the need to maintain the scrub vegetation. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. d) For the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), the required habitat management plans are required and shall establish protective zones around the eagle nest restricting certain activities. The plans shall also address restricting certain types of activities during the nesting season. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. e) For the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the required habitat protection plans are required and shall outline measures to avoid adverse impacts to active clusters and to minimize impacts to foraging habitat. Where adverse effects cannot be avoided, measures shall be taken to minimize on-site disturbance and compensate or mitigate for impacts that remain. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi Specie: Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. f) In areas where the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) may be present, the management plans are required and shall require that garbage be placed in bear proof e - - - - -- - - . -. bear-resistant containers where such containers are available and accepted for use by Collier County, or containers stored in locations not easily accessible to bears. The management plan shall also identify methods to inform local residents of the concerns related to interaction between black bears and humans. g) For projects located in Priority I and Priority II Panther Habitat areas, the management plans are required and shall discourage the destruction of undisturbed, native habitats that are preferred by the Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi) by directing intensive land uses to currently disturbed areas. Preferred habitats include pine flatwoods and hardwood hammocks. In turn, these areas shall be buffered from the most intense land uses ofoof the DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stall_are deleted. page r 7 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT-BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 project by using low intensity land uses (e.g., parks, passive recreational areas, golf courses). Golf courses within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District shall be designed and managed using standards found in that district. The management plans shall identify appropriate lighting controls for these permitted uses and shall also address the opportunity to utilize prescribed burning to maintain fire-adapted preserved vegetative communities and provide browse for white-tailed deer. - - __ --• • - _ _ South Florida Multi Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. h) In order to protect loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and other listed sea turtles that nest along Collier County beaches, projects within 300 feet of the MHW line shall limit outdoor lighting to that necessary for security and safety. Floodlights and landscape or accent lighting shall be prohibited. -- - text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 7.2.2: Revised text, page 40] of Policies 6.3.1, 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 of this eElement. text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 10.1: Revised text, page 43] Priorities for Give priority to water dependent shoreline land uses -- c- _ - _ - - - uses over water related shoreline land uses, and shall be based on type of water-dependent use, adjacent land use, and surrounding marine and upland habitat considerations. ... text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 10.1.6: Revised text, page 44] Objective 10.1 and its accompanying policies and the LDC shall serve as criteria for the review of c•'-- text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 10.3: Reference text only, page 45] Maintain undeveloped coastal barriers, mapped as part of the Federal Coastal Barrier Resources System, predominantly in their natural state and protect, maintain and enhance their natural function. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 10.3.15:Revised text, page 46] All new development proposed on undeveloped coastal barrier systems shall be reviewed through the County's existing "Special Treatment" ("ST") zoning overlay district. Objective 10.3 and its accompanying policies shall serve as criteria for such review. Development on undeveloped coastal barrier islands within the Special Treatment" ("ST") zoning overlay district shall be reviewed through criteria established in the land development regulations. Applicable Policies under Goal 10 will be used in developing such criteria. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 10.4.3: Revised text, page 47] Implementation of this pPolicy will be... text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 10.5: Revised text, page 48] DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted-age 5 L 8 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 For undeveloped shorelines, pProvide improved opportunities for recreational, educational, scientific, and aesthetic enjoyment of coastal resources for undeveloped shorelines.- This shall be accomplished by protecting beaches and dunes and by... Policy 10.5.1: Passive Rrecreation that is compatible with the natural functions of beaches and dunes is shall be regarded as the highest and best land use. Policy 10.5.2: The County shall pPrioritize acquisition efforts in order to meet the projected need for additional public beaches. Policy 10.5.3: The County shall pProhibit activities which would result in man induced shoreline erosion beyond the natural beach erosion cycle or that would deteriorate the beach dune system. Policy 10.5.4: The County may pProhibit construction of any structure seaward of the Coastal Construction Setback Line. Exceptions shall be allowed for passive recreational structures, access crossovers, and where enforcement would not allow any reasonable economic utilization of such property. In the latter event, require construction that shall minimizes interference with natural functions of such beaches and dunes. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 10.5.6: Revised text, page 49] The County shall rRegulate activities so that they will not threaten the stability of the dunes or the beach itself. Policy 10.5.7: The County shall pRursue the acquisition of undeveloped beaches and dunes as the first alternative to development. Policy 10.5.8: The County shall pRrohibit shoreline armoring processes and encourage non-structural methods for stabilizing beaches and dunes. Policy 10.5.9: The County shall pRrohibit construction seaward of the Coastal Construction Setback Line except as follows: a. Construction will be allowed for public access; b. For protection and restoration of beach resources; c. In cases of demonstrated land use related hardship or safety concerns as specified in The 1985 Florida Coastal Zone Protection Act, there shall be no shore armoring allowed except in cases of public safety. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 10.5.12:Revised text, page 49] For all b Beach front land development related projects shall require dune stabilization and restoration improvements, the removal of exotic vegetation, and replacement with native vegetation, as appropriate. text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted.Page of 9 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 Policy 10.6.1: Revised text, page 50] applicable pPolicies supporting Objectives 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, and 10.5 above... text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 50] 6. The requirements of this pPolicy... text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 11.1.1: Revised text, page 50] Continue in effect r Regulations regarding development and other land alteration activities that shall continue to ensure the conservation, sensitive re-use, preservation of significant historic and archaeological resources, or appropriate mitigation in accordance with State standards. text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 12.1: Revised text, page 51] Maintain hurricane evacuation clearance times as required by state law. An evacuation clearance time shall be is defined as having residents and visitors in an appropriate refuge away from storm surge prior to the arrival of sustained Tropical Storm force winds, i.e., winds equal to or greater than 39 mph. To further this °Objective, for future mobile home developments located outside of the storm surge zone, such development shall is to include on-site sheltering or retro-fitting of an adjacent facility. The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall continues to seek opportunities to increase shelter facilities and associated capacities under the direction of the Department of the Florida Division of Emergency Management. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 12.1.4: Revised text, page 52] The County shall sentinue-ts maintain hurricane shelter requirements and standards for all new mobile home parks and mobile home subdivisions, or existing mobile home parks and mobile home subdivisions in the process of expanding, which accommodate or contain twenty-six (26) units or more. Such mobile home parks or mobile home subdivisions shall be required to provide emergency shelter space on-site, or to provide funding to enhance one or more existing public shelters off-site. The building which provides the on-site shelter space (if this option is chosen) will be of such a size as to provide shelter to park or subdivision residents at the rate of twenty (20) square feet per person. For the purposes of this pPolicy, the size of the on-site shelter structure shall be determined by estimating the park or subdivision population during the June-November time frame, based upon methodologies utilized by the Collier County Emergency Management Department Bureau of Emergency Services. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 12.1.8: Revised text, page 53] The Countyls land development regulations shall include mitigation policies addressing flood plains, beach and dune alteration and storm water management. text break *** *** *** *** *** Page _of " DRAFT Words underlined are added;words str-us gh are deleted. 10 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 Policy 12.1.14:Revised text, page 53] All new nursing homes and assisted living facilities that are licensed shall have a core area to shelter residents and staff on site. The core area will be constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria that is required for new public schools and public community colleges and universities ("State Requirements for Educational Facilities," 2007 2014). Additionally, this area shall be capable of ventilation or air conditioning provided by back-up generator for a period of no less than seventy-two X72) hours. text break OBJECTIVE 12.2: Revised text, page 54] Ensure that publicly funded buildings and publicly funded development activities are carried out in a manner that demonstrates best practice to minimize the loss of life, property, and re-building cost from the affects from hurricanes, flooding, natural and technological disaster events. Best practice efforts aay include, but are not limited to: text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 12.3.1: Revised text, page 55] The Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan shall comply with the pPolicies under this Objective, and shall contain step-by-step details for post disaster recovery. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 12.3.3: Revised text, page 55] The Recovery Task Force shall include the Sheriff, the Growth Management Division Administrator Department Head, the Land Development Services Zoning Director, the Bureau of Emergency Services Director and other members as directed by the Board of County Commissioners, such as representatives from municipalities within the County that have received damage from a storm. text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 12.4: Revised text, page 56] Make every reasonable effort to meet the emergency preparedness requirements of Persons with Special Needs such as the elderly, handicapped, the infirmed and those requiring transportation from a threatened area. In the event of a countywide emergency, such as a hurricane or other large-scale disaster, the County Bureau of Emergency Services, in coordination with the County Health Department and other officials, shalt opens and operates one or more refuges for persons listed on the County's Special Needs Registry and their caregivers. Medical and support equipment at such refuges will include, but are not necessarily be limited to, respirators, oxygen tanks, first aid equipment, disaster cots and blankets, and defibrillators. PLEASE NOTE: Approval of amendments to this Element is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear—within and between Elements—as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document. Page of DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck rough are deleted. 11 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 EXHIBIT "A" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE) Update and make current the Table of Contents, along with corresponding titles, heading and other entries- inside and between Elements-to maximize internal consistency. Policy 1.1: Revised text, page 2] The County shall establish standards for levels of service (LOS) for public facilities, as follows: text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.5: The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: text break *** *** *** *** *** D. County Potable Water Systems: Revised text, page 6] County Water District = 170 150 gallons per capita per day (qpcd) E. County Sanitary Sewer - Wastewater Treatment Systems: Revised text, page 7] North Sewer Wastewater Treatment Service Area = 42-9 100 gallons per capita per day (qpcd) South Sewer Wastewater Treatment Service Area = 100 gallons per capita per day (qpcd) Southeast Sewer Service Area - 120 gallons per capita per day Northeast Sewer Service Area - 120 gallons per capita per day text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 4.1: Revised text, page 10] The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be reviewed and updated annually and may also be modified as follows: A. Pursuant to Florida Statutes, 163.3184 and 163.3187, the Schedule of Capital Improvements iT Pursuant to Florida Statutes, 163.3177, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted modified by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan. Policy 4.2: Revised text, page 10] By December 1 of each year, tThe County shall adopt, by reference, into its Capital Improvement Element, the School District's annually updated financially feasible Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the District Facilities Work Program in order to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards for Public School Facilities. The School District Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan shall identify identifies the financially feasible school facility capacity projects necessary to address existing deficiencies and future needs based on achieving and maintaining adopted LOS standards for schools. The District Facilities Work Program, prepared by the School District pursuant to Section 1013.35(1)(b), F.S., -shall be is adopted as part of the data and analysis in support of the School District's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Adoption by the County, of the School District's Capital Improvement Plan and the District Facilities Work Program shall occur, without requiring separate action,with approval of the District School Board annual update to the Schedule of Capital Improvements of this of Collier DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stuck--through are deleted. 1 Page la ofja Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 Element. FY 15 34, approved on May 13, 2014; and, the District Facilities Work Program FY 15 19, adopted by the School Board on September 9, 2014. text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 5: (CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT) Revised text, page 12] Ensure that public facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development through a Concurrency Management System. Policy 5.0,1: Renumbered text only, page 12] Policy 5.0-2: Renumbered text only, page 12] Policy 5.4 3: Renumbered text only, page 12] Policy 5.2 4: Renumbered text only, page 12] A. Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policy 54 5.3 A, B and C is met; or Policy 5.3 5: Renumbered text only, page 13] Policy 5.4 6: Renumbered text only, page 13] Policy 5.5 7: Renumbered text only, page 14] text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 5.2 4: Revised text, page 12] text break *** *** *** *** *** A. Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policy 54 5_3 A, B and C is met; or text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 5.3 5: Revised text, page 13] text break *** *** *** *** *** D. The necessary facilities and services are under construction or under contract pursuant to a FDOT 5-Year Work Program and are consistent with the Collier County 2025 2040 Long Range Needs Plan or the 2030 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), as adopted by the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO); or text break *** *** *** *** *** Footnotes Revised text, page 23] These footnotes provide brief explanations of revenue sources and their acronyms found in the Schedule of Capital Improvements, and where to find related supporting data & analysis. 1. Note: Impact Fee (IF) revenues are projected from actual historical revenue and current permitting activity and forecasts. Impact fees and other sources may yield Interest (IN) revenues. Refer to Appendix "I". Certain impact fees are referenced with direct connection to facility type, such as Water Impact Fees (WIF) or Sewer Wastewater Impact Fees (SIF) and may be termed System Development fees. Water and sewer impact fees are also projected based on population projections prepared by the Comprehensive Planning Department Section. Deferred Impact Fees (DIF) may generate revenue. 2. Note: Grant and Reimbursement (GR) revenues are based on project-specific funding agreements with the State of Florida, South Florida Water Management District or other agency. Refer to Appendix "I". DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck reug#are deleted.2 Page• 3 of ~, Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 3. Note: Developer Contribution Agreement (DCA) or advanced reimbursement revenues are based on a project-specific agreement with an active developer doing business in Collier County. 4. Note: Certificate of Adequacy (COA) revenues are projected from historical revenue information. 5. Note: Gas Tax (GA) revenues are projected from historical revenue information. Gas taxes may yield Interest (IN) revenues. Refer to Appendix "I". 6. Note: Ave Maria (AV) revenues are based on a project-specific Developer Contribution Agreement DCA) with Ave Maria Development, LLP. Refer to Appendix "1" 7. Note: Available Cash (AC) (also known as Carry Forward or Beginning Cash) revenues are based on a combination of encumbered and unencumbered funds from prior years that will continue to rollover until they are spent on projects or payment of debt service. 8. Note: Transfer (TR) revenue is money coming in from another fund, and is projected from historical information. Value may be added through commitments and leases. Refer to Appendix "I". 9. Note: General Fund (GF) revenues are projected from historical revenue information. General Fund 001) revenues derive principally from ad valorem taxes levied on properties Countywide, intergovernmental revenues (i.e., Sales Tax and Revenue Sharing), charges for services, interest, and transfers from other funds and Constitutional Officers. MSTU General Fund — Unincorporated Areas Fund (111) revenues derive principally from ad valorem taxes levied on properties in the unincorporated areas of the County, intergovernmental revenues (i.e., Communications Tax), charges for services, interest, and transfers from other funds. Refer to Appendix "I". 10. Note: Revenue Reserve Reduction (RR) revenues are based on a percentage of total new revenue., as required by law, Chapter 129, Florida Statutes. Refer to Appendix "I". 11. Note: Revenue Bond Financing (B) or Bond Proceeds (revenue) are usually received as a lump sum but occasionally can be received in installments, and are not based on historical revenues. In some instances, this item is actually shown as an expense for bond debt service payments, and in other instances, this item shows bond revenue proceeds. Revenue bond covenants and commercial paper documentation are voluminous and do not appear in support documents. The pertinent information is however provided in the Consulting Engineering and Financial Feasibility Report, dated October 25, 2006, and appears in Appendix "I". 12. Note: Capital Account (CA) revenues are projected based on the capital projects spending needs. Refer to Appendix"I". Certain capital accounts are referenced with direct connection to facility type, such as Water Capital Accounts (WCA) and Sewer Wastewater Capital Accounts (SCA). 13. Note: User Fee (UF) revenues are projected from historical revenue information. Refer to Appendix I". Certain user fees are referenced with direct connection to the user under contract, such as Landfill Tipping Fees (LTF). 14. Note: Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) or Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) revenues are projected from historical revenue information. 15. Note: State Revolving Fund Loan (SRF) revenues are received in installments during the course of a project. Refer to Appendix "I". 16. Note: Commercial Paper (LOC) or local financial institution loan revenue is short-term borrowing usually meant for funding projects underway until such time another funding source is received. These revenues may derived from obligated return on additional senior liens. Commercial paper documentation and revenue bond covenants are voluminous and do not appear in support documents. The pertinent information is however provided in the Consulting Engineering and Financial Feasibility Report, dated October 25, 2006, and appears in Appendix "I". DRAFT Words underlined are added;words-struck through are deleted.3 Page 14 of , Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 17. Note: Rate Revenue (REV) revenues are based on historical revenue information combined with the projection of volume change and revenue requirement projections. Refer to Appendix "I". 18. Note: Additional Roll Forward (ARF) revenues are cash reserves intended for, but previously unspent on, future protects or payment of debt service. text break *** *** *** *** *** V. PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION Revised text, page 26] text break *** *** *** *** *** 6.C. ... the requirements of Policies 5.4 3, 5.2 4, 5.3 5 and 5.4 6 of this Element. PLEASE NOTE: Approval of amendments to this Element is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear—within and between Elements—as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted.4 Page 15- of Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) Update and make current the Table of Contents, along with corresponding titles, heading and other entries- inside and between Elements-to optimize internal consistency. FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Revised text, Table of Contents page iv] Future Land Use Map Mixed Use & Interchange Activity Centers Maps Properties Consistent by Policy (5.9, 5.10, 5.11, 5.12, 5.13, 5.14) Maps Reference text, page 10] GOAL: TO GUIDE LAND USE DECISION-MAKING SO AS TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN A HIGH QUALITY NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WITH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH PROMOTE THE PUBLIC'S HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE CONSISTENT WITH STATE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS AND LOCAL DESIRES. OBJECTIVE 1: Revised text, page 10] Unless otherwise permitted in this Growth Management Plan, new or revised uses of land shall bo consistent with designations outlined on the Future Land Use Map. The Future Land-Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts and Sub districts shall be binding on all Development Orders effective with the adoption of this Growth Management Plan. Standards and e -. - --- -• - -e --• - - - -• - --• -- Land Use Map is designed to coordinate land use with the natural environment including topography, Promote well planned land uses consistent with Future Land Use Designations, Districts and Subdistricts and the Future Land Use Map to ensure compatibility between the natural and human environments. Policy 1.1: Unless otherwise permitted in this Growth Management Plan, new or revised uses of land shall be consistent with designations outlined on the Future Land Use Map. Policy 1.2: The Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts and Subdistricts shall be binding on all Development Orders effective with the adoption of this Growth Management Plan. Policy 1.3: Standards and permitted uses for each Future Land Use District and Subdistrict shall be identified in the Designation Description Section. Policy 1.4: Through the magnitude, location and configuration of its components, the Future Land Use Map shall be designed to coordinate land use with the natural environment including topography, soil and other resources; promote a sound economy; coordinate coastal population densities with the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Plan; and discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stegh are deleted. 1 Page /6> of ' la_ Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT-BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 Policy 1.1 through Policy 1.5 renumbered as Policy 1.5 through Policy 1.9. All references to Policies 1.1 through Policy 1.5 in this Element or in another Element or Sub-Element of the GMP are renumbered accordingly. text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 2: Revised text, page 12] Coordinate land uses with the availability of public facilities shall bet accomplished through the Concurrency Management System of the Capital Improvement Element and implemented through the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance of the Land Development Code. Policy 2.1: The County shall maintain the Concurrency Management System in the Capital Improvement Element by implementation of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance in the Land Development Code. Policy 2.1 through Policy 2.6 renumbered as Policy 2.2 through Policy 2.7. All references to Policies 2.1 through Policy 2.6 in this Element or in another Element or Sub-Element of the GMP are renumbered accordingly. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 2.2 3 Renumbered only, page 12] Deficiencies or potential deficiencies that have been determined through the Annual Update and Inventory Report on capital public facilities may include the following remedial actions: establish an area of significant influence for roads, a TCEA, TCMA, add projects to the Capital Improvement Element, enter into a binding commitment with a Developer to construct the needed facilities or defer development until improvements can be made or the level of service is amended to ensure available capacity. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 2.5 6: Revised text, page 12] The County has designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMA) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that provides multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of the TranspoFtatieg Capital Improvement Element. Standards within TCMAs are provided in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element. New Development within each TCMA shall be consistent with the criteria set forth in Objective 6, and its supporting Policies 6.1 through 6.5 6.7 of this Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are hereby designated: text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 3: Revised text, page 13] pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, Florida Statutes (F.S.), in order to c Ensure protection of natural and historic resources, ensure the availability of land for utility facilities, promote compatible land uses within the airport noise zone, and to provide for management of growth in an efficient and effective manner through Land Development Regulations adopted to implement this Growth Management Plan. Policy 3.1: Land Development Regulations shall be adopted, as necessary, to implement this Growth Management Plan pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, Florida Statutes. Policy 3.1 and Policy 3.2 renumbered as Policy 3.2 and Policy 3.3. text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are delated. e 7 4 >. 2 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 Policy 3.2.j. consistency with one or more of Policies 5,9 5.11 through 543 5.15. text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 4: Revised text, page 15] Continually refine the Future Land Use Element through detailed planning in 1n order to improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development, I=1-housing and urban design, •- - - - - •e - - -••-• - --• __ - - - • -__ • e• _ . Policy 4.1: Planning studies may address specific geographic or issue areas. Policy 4.1 through Policy 4.10 renumbered as Policy 4.2 through Policy 4.11. text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 5: Revised text, page 17] Implement land use policies that In order to promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element, the following general land use Policy 5.1: Land use policies supporting Objective 5 shall be implemented upon the adoption of the Growth Management Plan. Policy 5.2: Land use policies supporting Objective 5 shall continue to be implemented upon the adoption of amendments to the Growth Management Plan. Policy 5.1 through Policy 5.14 renumbered as Policy 5.3 through Policy 5.16. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 5.4812: Revised text, page 19] The zoning on property for which an exemption has been granted based on... this pPolicy shall exempt any development from... text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 6: Revised text, page 22] Designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) are as geographically compact areas designated in local government comprehensive plans where intensive development exists, or such development is planned. TCMAs are supported by the following Policies. New development within of the Transportation Element) and further the achievement of the following identified important state protecting historic resources, maximizing the efficient use of existing public facilities, and promoting public transit, bicycling,walking and other alternatives to the single occupant automobile. Transportation Policy 2.5 of this Element. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struckgh are deleted. Page (j of3 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 Policy 6.1: New development within a TCMA shall occur in a manner that will ensure an adequate level of mobility as defined in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element) and further the achievement of the following identified important state planning goals and policies: discouraging the proliferation of urban sprawl, protecting natural resources, protecting historic resources, maximizing the efficient use of existing public facilities, and promoting public transit, bicycling, walking and other alternatives to the single occupant automobile. Policy 6.2: Transportation Concurrency Management Areas have been established and shall be supported in the specific geographic areas described in Policy 2.6 of this Element. Policy 6.1 through Policy 6.5 renumbered as Policy 6.3 through Policy 6.7. text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 7: Revised text, page 24] In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community e. - , _ :_, :Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier the County, cc--- - ..e - - --e.-- , where applicable.-, in support of the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, as follows: text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 7.5: Revised text, page 24] The County shall encourage mixed-use development within the same buildings by allowing residential dwelling units over and/or abutting commercial development. This pPolicy shall be implemented through provisions in specific sSubdistricts in this Growth Management Plan. text break *** *** *** *** *** I. URBAN DESIGNATION A. Urban Mixed Use District text break *** *** *** *** *** 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict:Revised text, page 34] text break *** *** *** *** *** g. For freestanding residential uses, acreage to be... allowed by FLUE, Policy 54 5.3. text break *** *** *** *** *** 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict: Revised text, page 42] text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. Residential density is... limited to four dwelling units per acre; density in excess of three (3)dwelling units per acre must be... For property not within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict and not within the Coastal High Hazard Area, density shall be limited to sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre; density in excess of three u dwelling units per acre and up to eleven (11) dwelling units... text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words strums are deleted. Page ll.of "4 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 I. URBAN DESIGNATION A. Urban Mixed Use District text break *** *** *** *** *** 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict: Revised text, page 43] text break *** *** *** *** *** To encourage mixed-use projects, this Subdistrict also permits residential development, when t=located in a mixed-use building (residential uses over commercial uses). Such residential development is allowed at a maximum density of sixteen (16) dwelling units... text break *** *** *** *** *** I. URBAN DESIGNATION A. Urban Mixed Use District text break *** *** *** *** *** 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict [Revised text, page 43] text break *** *** *** *** *** This Subdistrict consists of two parcels... For mixed-use development, residential density shall be limited to sixteen (16)dwelling units per acre. text break *** *** *** *** *** I. URBAN DESIGNATION B. DENSITY RATING SYSTEM 1. The Density Rating System is applied in the following manner: [Revised text, page 50] text break *** *** *** *** *** e. All new residential zoning located within Districts, Subdistricts and Overlays identified above that are subject to this Density Rating System shall be consistent with this Density Rating System, except as provided in: 1) Policy a 5_3 of the Future Land Use Element. text break *** *** *** *** *** 2. Density Bonuses: Revised text, page 51] text break *** *** *** *** *** c. Affordable-Workforce Housing Bonus: in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to eight (8) residential units... text break *** *** *** *** *** 4. Density Conditions: Revised text, page 53] The following density condition applies to all properties subject to the Density Rating System. a. Maximum Density The maximum allowed density shall not exceed sixteen (16)dwelling units... text break *** *** *** *** *** 5. Density Blending Revised text, page 54] text break *** *** *** *** *** kidor DRAFT Words underlined are added;words are deleted. Page 2O ofr4.a,.' 5 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 2. Density Blending Conditions and Limitations for Properties Straddling the Urban Residential Fringe Sub-District and Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending lands: text break *** *** *** *** *** f) Native vegetation shall be preserved as follows: 1) The Urban portion of... the maximum required 60 sixty percent (60%) of the total Sending Land area... The ratio for such native vegetation preservation shall be two ) acres of... In no instance shall less than 1-0 ten percent (10%) of the required amount of native vegetation... text break *** *** *** *** *** I. URBAN DESIGNATION C. Urban Commercial District 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict Revised text, page 57] Mixed Use Activity Centers have been designated on the Future Land Use Map Series identified in the Future Land Use Element. ...this includes 3 three Interchange Activity Centers... text break *** *** *** *** *** Mixed-use developments — whether consisting of... the eligible density is sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre. If such a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center... the eligible density shall be limited to four dwelling units per acre... text break *** *** *** *** *** The factors to consider during review of a rezone petition for a project, or portion thereof, within an Activity Center, are as follows: text break *** *** *** *** *** b. The amount, type and location of existing zoned commercial land, and developed commercial uses, both within the Mixed Use Activity Center and within two L21 road miles of the Mixed Use Activity Center. c. Market demand and service area for the proposed commercial land uses to be used as a guide to explore the feasibility of the requested land uses. d. Existing patterns of land use within the Mixed Use Activity Center and within two gj radial miles. text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 61] New Mixed Use Activity Centers may be proposed if all of the following criteria are met and an amendment is made to delineate the specific boundaries on the Future Land Use Map series for Mixed Use Activity Centers: the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center is located consists of an arterial and collector road, or two arterial roads, based upon roadway classifications contained in the Transportation Element. the Mixed Use Activity Center is no closer than two (2) miles from any existing Mixed Use Activity Center, as measured from the center point of the intersections around which the existing and proposed Mixed Use Activity Centers are located. text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struckgh are deleted.6 Page of Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 I. URBAN DESIGNATION C. Urban Commercial District 6. Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict [Revised text, page 64] This Subdistrict consists of... The maximum allowed development intensities include 91,000 square feet of professional or medical office use in buildings containing a maximum height of thirty-five (35) feet, or 200,000 square feet of indoor self-storage area in buildings containing a maximum of three ,() stories and at a maximum height of fifty(50)feet. Should a mix of office and indoor self-storage facilities develop on the property, for each two L2j square feet of indoor self-storage area, one (1) square foot of office area shall be reduced from the maximum allowable office area permitted. ... text break *** *** *** *** *** I. URBAN DESIGNATION C. Urban Commercial District 7. Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Revised text, page 64] This Subdistrict consists of... The maximum allowed development intensities include a maximum of 52,500 square feet of professional or medical office use in buildings containing a maximum of three (3) stories, which could include two (2) stories over parking, and at a maximum height of fifty (50)feet. text break *** *** *** *** *** II. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION text break *** *** *** *** *** B. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District 1. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), and Sending, Neutral, and Receiving Designations: text break *** *** *** *** *** A) Receiving Lands:Revised text, page 74] text break *** *** *** *** *** 4. Emergency Preparedness: text break *** *** *** *** *** b) Applicants for new developments proposed for Receiving Lands shall work with the P. -• - - -e - —- -e-•- Florida Forest Service and the Managers of any adjacent or nearby public lands, to develop a Wildfire Prevention and Mitigation Plan that will reduce the likelihood of threat to life and property from wildfires. This plan will address, at a minimum: project structural design; the use of materials and location of structures so as to reduce wildfire threat; firebreaks and buffers; water features; and, the impacts of prescribed burning on adjacent or nearby lands. text break *** *** *** *** *** II. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted.eq 7 Page cla of_LL Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 B. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District 1. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), and Sending, Neutral, and Receiving Designations: text break *** *** *** *** *** C) Sending Lands: Revised text, page 82] text break *** *** *** *** *** 6. Early Entry TDR Bonus: An Early Entry TDR Bonus shall be available in the form of an additional one TDR Credit for each base TDR Credit severed from Sending Lands from March 5, 2004, _• _ _ _ - _ __ e -• -_ _ - •- . ___ _ _ e _ amendment implementing this provision, or until September 27, 204-5 2018. Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits may be used after the termination of the bonus period. text break *** *** *** *** *** II. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION text break *** *** *** *** *** B. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. Rural Villages: Revised text, page 86] text break *** *** *** *** *** A) Process for Approval: A - e-- - - -- e. - - - --- - - The Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to includes provisions for the establishment of Rural Villages. These provisions will establish specific development regulations, standards, and land use mix requirements. Subsequent to the creation of these provisions, applications shall be submitted in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezone and, where applicable, in conjunction with a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) application as provided for in Chapter 380 of Florida Statutes, or in conjunction with any other Florida provisions of law that may supersede the DRI process. text break *** *** *** *** *** III. ESTATES DESIGNATION Revised text, page 92] The Estates Land Use Designation encompasses lands which are already subdivided into semi rural residential parcels (2.25 acres as an average) essentially consisting of the Golden Gate Estates Subdivision. The area is identified as having potential for population growth far removed from supportive services and facilities. Expansion of the area shall be discouraged. Pursuant to Policy 44 4.2 of the Future Land Use Element, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan encompassing the Estates Designation was adopted by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on February 5, 1991. Refer to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan for siting criteria and development standards for specific land uses. text break *** *** *** *** *** V. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES Revised text, page 94] A. Area of Critical State Concern Overlay The Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) was established by the 1974 Florida Legislature. The ACSC Critical Area is displayed on the Future Land Use Map as an overlay area. The ACSC Critical Area encompasses lands designated Conservation, Agricultural/Rural, Estates DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck are deleted. Page 25...of 8 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 and Urban (Port of the Islands, Plantation Island and Copeland). Chokoloskee is outside the boundaries of the Big Cypress ACSC. Two areas located within the boundaries of the ACSC are exempt from the ACSC regulations: Everglades City; and, Ochopee, which is described as all of Sections 27, 28, 33 and 34, Township 52 South, Range 30 East. All Development Orders within the Critical Area shall comply with Chapter 28-25, Florida Administrative Code, "Boundary and Regulations for the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern,"this ACSC Overlay, and the ACSC zoning overlay in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended, except as provided by Agreement pursuant to Chapter 380.032(3), F.S. There is an existing Development Agreement between Port of the Islands, Inc. and the [then] State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, approved in July 1985, which regulates land uses in the Port of the Islands Urban area; and, there is an Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners and the fthenl Florida Department of Community Affairs, approved in April 2005, pertaining to development in Plantation Island. Chokoloskee is excluded from the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. All Development Orders within the Critical Area shall comply Area of Critical State Concern". Those regulatioes,The ACSC Regulations include the following: 1. Site Alteration a. Site alteration shall be limited to 10% of the total site size, and installation of non-permeable surfaces shall not exceed 50% of any such area. However, a minimum of 2,500 square feet may be altered on any permitted site. b. Any non-permeable surface greater than 20,000 square feet shall provide for release of surface run off, collected or uncollected, in a manner approximating the natural surface. c. Soils exposed during site alteration shall be stabilized and retention ponds or performance equivalent structures or systems maintained in order to retain run off and siltation on the construction site. Restoration of vegetation to site alteration areas shall be substantially completed within 180 days following completion of a development. Re-vegetation shall be accomplished with pre-existing species or other suitable species except that undesirable exotic species shall not be replanted or propagated. Exotic Undesirable exotic species are listed below. Australian Pine - (Casuarina spp.) Bishopwood - (Bischofia javanica) Brazilian Pepper - (Shinus terebinthfolius) Melaleuca (cajeput) - (Melaleuca leucadendra ) Castor bean — (Ricinus communis) Common papaya — (Carica papaya) Common snakeplant— (Sanseviera trifasciata) Day jessamine — (Cestrum diurnum) Hunters robe— (Raphidophora aurea) Queensland umbrella tree — (Schefflera actinophylla) Trailing wedelia — (Wedelia trilobata) All other species included in the definition of"vegetation, prohibited exotic" contained in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ord. No. 04-41, as amended. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted.Page.34, of '7 9 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 Java Plum (Syzygium cumini) d. No mangrove trees or salt marsh grasses shall be destroyed or otherwise altered. Plants specifically protected by this regulation include: All wetland plants listed by the Florida as amended. Red mangrove— (Rhizophora mangle) Black mangrove — (Avicennia nitida) White mangrove — (Laquncularia racemosa) Needlerush — (Juncus roemerianus) Salt cordgrasses — (Spartina alterniflora, S. patens, S. cynosuroides, S. spartinae) Seashore saltgrass — (Distichlis spicata) text break *** *** *** *** *** 2. Drainage a. Existing drainage facilities shall not be modified so as to discharge water to any coastal waters, either directly or through existing drainage facilities. Existing drainage facilities shall not be expanded in capacity or length except in conformance with paragraph (2)"b." below; however, modifications may be made to existing facilities that will raise the ground water table or limit salt water intrusion. text break *** *** *** *** *** All Development Orders issued for projects within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern shall be rendered to the State of Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for review with the potential for appeal to the Administration Commission per Chapter 73C-44, Florida Administrative Code, "Community Planning, Development Order Requirements for Areas of Critical State Concern". text break *** *** *** *** *** V. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES text break *** *** *** *** *** B. North Belle Meade Overlay text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. RECEIVING AREAS Revised text, page 99] Within the NBM Overlay, Receiving Areas are... located Sections 21, 28 and the west 1/4 western quarter of Sections 22 and 27, ...and the western quarters of Sections 22 and 27 as a permitted use. text break *** *** *** *** *** Because of the proximity of Sections 21 and 28 and west%quarters of sSections 22 and 27 to Golden Gate Estates... text break *** *** *** *** *** V. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted.Paged of' l° Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 B. North Belle Meade Overlay text break *** *** *** *** *** 6. SECTION 24 NEUTRAL LANDS text break *** *** *** *** *** e. Cowan Property — Lots 14-16, 25, 26 and 35 Combined (Colored Blue and Labeled Cowan" and "Blue" on North Belle Meade Overlay Section 24 Map) text break *** *** *** *** *** 2) Clustering: Revised text, page 107] a) Up to two al clustered developments are allowed, and a maximum of nineteen 19)total dwelling units are allowed in cluster development(s). This dwelling unit figure is based upon the total Cowan ownership in Section 24 of approximately 97.7 acres. b) Lot 35 may contain up to, but no more than, three (3) clustered dwelling units — in addition to road access for all Cowan property development(s). A second residential cluster outside of Lot 35 may contain the balance of the nineteen (19) clustered dwelling units not built on !Lot 35. text break *** *** *** *** *** V. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES text break *** *** *** *** *** D. Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay Goal:Revised text, page 116] Collier County seeks t To address the long-term needs of residents and property owners within the Immokalee Area Study boundary of the Collier County Rural and Agricultural Area Assessment.- Collier County's goal is to y protectin C agricultural activities, to preventing the premature conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural uses, to directing incompatible uses away from wetlands and upland habitat, to enable enabling the conversion of rural land to other uses in appropriate locations, to discourage discouraging urban sprawl, and to encourage encouraging development that utilizes implements creative land use planning techniques. Objective: To meet the Goal described above, Collier County's objective is to c Create an incentive based land use overlay system, herein referred to as the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, based on the principles of rural land stewardship as defined in Chapter 163.3177(11), F.S. The Policies that will implement this Goal and Objective... Group 1 — General purpose and structure of the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.6: Revised text, page 117] Designation as an SSA shall be administrative and shall not require an amendment to the Growth Management Plan, but shall be retroactively incorporated into the adopted Overlay Map during the EAR based amendment process when it periodically occurs, or sooner at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. ... text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.22: Revised text, page 120] DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck-threugh are deleted. Page of 11 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 The RLSA Overlay was designed to be a long-term strategic plan... and reviewed by Collier County and the `-e- - ••-- - -- •• - A • State land planning agency (presently, the Department of Economic Opportunity) upon... text break *** *** ** *** *** Policy 3.11: Revised text, page 125] In certain locations... This pPolicy does not... text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 4.3: Revised text, page 126] Land becomes designated as a SRA upon petition by a property owner to Collier County seeking such designation and the adoption of a resolution by the BCC granting the designation. The petition shall include a SRA master plan as described in Policy 4.5. The basis for approval shall be a finding of consistency with the policies of the Overlay, including required suitability criteria set forth herein, compliance with the LDC Stewardship District, and assurance that the applicant has acquired or will acquire sufficient Stewardship Credits to implement the SRA uses. n one year from the effective date of this amendment, Collier The County shall-adopt has adopted LDC amendments to establish the procedures and submittal requirements for designation as a SRA, providing for consideration of impacts, including environmental and public infrastructure impacts, and provisions for public notice of and the opportunity for public participation in any consideration by the BCC of such a designation. Policy 4.4: Collier County will update the Overlay Map to delineate the boundaries of each approved SRA. Such updates shall not require an amendment to the Growth Management Plan, but shall be fetreastively be incorporated into the adopted Overlay Map during the EAR based amendment process when it periodically occurs, or sooner at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 4.16: Revised text, page 131] A SRA shall have adequate infrastructure available... by this pPolicy... text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 4.18: Revised text, page 132] The SRA will be planned and designed to be fiscally neutral or positive to Collier County at the horizon year based on a cost/benefit fiscal impact analysis model acceptable to or as may be adopted by the County public facilities impact assessment, as identified in LDC 4.08.07.K. The BCC may grant exceptions to this pPolicy to accommodate affordable-workforce Housing, as it deems appropriate. Techniques that may promote fiscal neutrality such as Community Development Districts, and other special districts, shall be encouraged. At a minimum, the analysis assessment shall consider the following public facilities and services: transportation, potable water, wastewater, irrigation water, stormwater management, solid waste, parks, law enforcement, and schools. Development phasing, developer contributions and mitigation, and other public/private partnerships shall address any potential adverse impacts to adopted levels of service standards. Policy 4.19: Eight I8j.Gredits shall be required for... Policy 4.20: The acreage of... For the purpose of this pPolicy... DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck ough are deleted. Page ja of h112 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 Policy 4.21: Lands within the... This pPolicy is intended to... text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 5.5: Revised text, page 133] text break *** *** *** *** *** 2. Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species and for those protected species identified below shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated indicates listed species or the protected species identified below are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Management plans for new preserves shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain habitat within the preserve for listed species and those protected species identified below. 2.a. Management plans for new preserves shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species, and those protected species identified below, and their habitats from the negative impacts of proposed development. Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors. i. The following references shall be used, as appropriate, to prepare the required management plans• 1. South Florida Multi Species Recovery Plan, USFWS, 1999. 2. Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region, USFWS, 1987. 3. Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus in Florida, Technical Report No. 4, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1987. Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), Technical Report No. 8, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. Nongame Technical Report No. 13, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1993. i. Management guidelines contained in publications used by the FFWCC and USFWS for technical assistance shall be used for developing required management plans. ii. The County shall consider any other techniques recommended by the USFWS and FFWCC, subject to the provision of paragraph 3 of this pPolicy. iii. When listed species are directly observed on site or indicated by evidence, such as denning, foraging, or other indications, a minimum of 40% of native vegetation on site shall be retained, with the exception of clearing for agricultural purposes. The DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted. 13 Page ae) ofi„rA Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 County shall also consider the recommendation of other agencies, subject to the provisions of paragraph 3 of this pPolicy. 2.b. For parcels containing gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), priority shall be given habitat management plans are required and shall give priority to protecting the largest most contiguous gopher tortoise habitat with the greatest number of active burrows, and for providing a connection to off site adjacent gopher tortoise preserves. 2.c. Habitat preservation plans for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) are required and shall conform to the guidelines contained in Technical Report No. 8, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. The required management plan shall also provide for a maintenance program and specify ah appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. The plan shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on site preserve and the need to maintain the scrub vegetation. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. 2.d. For the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), the required habitat management plans are required and shall establish protective zones around the eagle nest restricting certain activities. The plans shall also address restricting certain types of activities during the nest season. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi Species Recover Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this Pelle* 2.e. For the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the required habitat protection plans are required and shall outline measures to avoid adverse impacts to active clusters and to minimize impacts to foraging habitat. Where adverse effects cannot be avoided, measures shall be taken to minimize on-site disturbance and compensate or mitigate for impacts that remain. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provision of paragraph 3) of this policy. 2.f. In areas where the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) may be present, the management plans are required and shall require that garbage be placed in bear- e - _ _ - _ • _ e__ _• bear-resistant containers where such containers are available and accepted for use by Collier County, or containers stored in locations not easily accessible to bears. The management plan shall also identify methods to inform local residents of the concerns related to interaction between black bears and humans. Mitigation for impacting habitat suitable for black bear shall be considered in the management plan. text break *** *** *** *** *** 2.g. For projects located in Priority I or Priority II Panther Habitat areas, the management plans are required and shall discourage the destruction of undisturbed, native habitats that are preferred by the Florida panther (Fells concolor coot') by directing intensive land uses to currently disturbed areas. Preferred habitats include pine flatwoods and hardwood hammocks. In turn, these areas shall be buffered from the most intense land uses of the project by using low intensity land uses (e.g., parks, passive recreational areas, golf courses). Gold courses within the Rural Lands Area shall be designed and managed using standards found within this Overlay. The management plans shall identify appropriate lighting controls for these permitted uses and shall also address the opportunity to utilize prescribed burning to maintain fire-adapted preserved vegetation communities and provide browse for white-tailed deer. These requirements shall be DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struckgh are deleted. 14 Page 9 of Add Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. 2.h. The Management Plans shall contain a monitoring program for developments greater than ten (10) acres. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 5.6: Revised text, page 136] For those lands... of a wetland. This pPolicy shall be implemented as follows: 1. There are two (2) major wetlands systems within the RLSA, Camp Keais Strand and the Okaloacoochee Slough. These two systems have been mapped and are designated as FSA's. Policy 5.1 prohibits certain uses within the FSA's, thus preserving and protecting the wetlands functions within those wetland systems. 2. The other significant wetlands within the RLSA are WRA's as described in Policy 3.3. These areas are protected by existing SFWMD wetlands permits for each area. 3. FSAs, HSAs and WRAs, as provided in Policy 5.3, and the ACSC have stringent site clearing and alteration limitations, nonpermeable surface limitations, and requirements addressing surface water flows which protect wetland functions within the wetlands in those areas. Other wetlands within the RLSA are isolated or seasonal wetlands. These wetlands will be protected based upon the wetland functionality assessment described below, and the final permitting requirements of the South Florida Water Management District. a. The County shall apply the vegetation retention, open space and site preservation requirements specified within this Overlay to preserve an appropriate amount of native vegetation on site. Wetlands shall be preserved as part of this vegetation requirement according to the following criteria: i. The acreage requirements... in paragraph Ib)of this pPolicy. ...Within-one-year-from the effective date of this Amendment, tThe County shall develop apply specific criteria in the LDC to be used to determine those instances in which wetlands with a WRAP functionality assessment score of 0.65 or a Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method score of 0.7, or greater must be preserved in excess of the preservation required by Policy 5.3. ii. Wetlands utilized used by... iii. Proposed development shall... be designed in accordance with Sections '1.2.2.1, 6.11 and 6.12 of SFWMD's Basis of Review, January 2001 10.2.2.4 of the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume I, and Sections 3.11 and 3.12 of the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume 11 for use within the Geographic Limits of the South Florida Water Management District 2014). text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 138] c. All direct impacts... of this pPolicy. text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 139] f.iv. Prior to issuance of any final development order that authorizes site alteration, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with paragraphs (f) i, ii, and iii of this pPolicy. If agency permits have not provided mitigation consistent with this pPolicy, Collier County will require mitigation exceeding that of the jurisdictional agencies. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted. 15 Page LL of '71 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 text break *** *** *** *** *** V. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES text break *** *** *** *** *** F. Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay Revised text, page 140] text break *** *** *** *** *** 4. Properties... may be allowed a maximum density of twelve (12) residential units... and comply with the standards identified in Rparagraph # no. 8, below, except for... 5. Properties... at a maximum density of eight (8) residential units per acre... text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 141] 8. To qualify for twelve (12) dwelling units per acre, as provided for in paragraph # no. 4 above... 9. For density bonuses provided for in paragraphs nos. #4 and #5 above, base density shall be per the underlying zoning district. The maximum density of twelve (12) or eight (8) units per acre... text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 141] 11. A maximum of... as provided in paragraphs nos. #4 and #5 above. text break *** *** *** *** *** Revised text, page 144] FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Future Land Use Map Activity Center Index Map Mixed Use & Interchange Activity Center Maps Properties Consistent by Policy (5.9, 5.10, 5.11, 5.12, 5.13, 5.14) Maps PLEASE NOTE: Approval of amendments to this Element is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear—within and between Elements—as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struek-threuggh are deleted. 16 Page,3 t ,ofd T 45 S 1 T 47 S T 48 S T 48 S T 50 S 1 T 51 S 1 T 52 S 1 T 58 Sm $ w 8 g E B 8 ^g - 8 0 i R R .i 1 S g a 89 m . 0 8 1A WA g' o, at ^:5 'CI g65. g 7 .1 iswoW1.4 cgs 8 32 o 33, 2332332a25aa1a =ogog& g- =ae& $a a =a' =a =ah < 8 W g E g ie < < < 3 i 3 3 v< < w'a 8 < we'y W v< v`v W gV' A1Nn0 3avCw $m ` 3 S 'A I $gg 3 AiNnO3 aavMoae sImoLsEggPa'1 m=4 W U RU ma U .c'rA . I1.I m I-* A WWdQ 8JzeQEg=4 sg` s g < g o z? R gmgggt2`r, E,5 i 3z azW J W d s 'a tx g g Yg g\1' s= ` g g a' d o z am o4 5 'gg E g a1 E. bp N < w y EF a Cw`°<G3„w j 411q em g' g I A p 2 a y g Eno h ul I _ I :: p;. Wiz Pi 1 s N E galea o W W ut i €: Z Q W cn eN s g 4 E,w7 z a r Z esi°4= zd Asn i < a y s§mt,d8W`!' E -d aW"§ NQ o— C'i 8 8 8 8' ; 885;8 w '3=` 255 of 'a €gid o e o ghitg w g x cK a8 z 8 ag s='a=b.9 EL 3 W W m . ; = •,W=o s,>s=s g ,8, -X Et i e gr a Q LL W T m J ¢ ee nT K tlT o b uiiiii. ip• 10dir e E2 ZI FNL,JY W J QW z 3 3 4 i w a NUUIw " IF eV U dQtiril"gCc ZAllilrAH 5 Z p 4 g M III g1111111111 e`IH ` x o - tF.; Q+u N 11111"'1I111 IIII Yh r" n• vt:• ou;w,i, zmz a. Th 7 ! UW am 3Y :. ...S ULLNQf3wQ i k. 8 E J aO z f K 111111L°aft I1 I H ° W L a/may , k 0111.4 M E yyby aft Wiat a : LL O C:• W 2 Kcc N I z cc 4 g c ci J/ 6c. 1:/'/' P Q ° r>... /01. 'E ip, a TEgg itt\ ihrlIMIrlia ni f _JP"-----" ,.,„ 9',, _ cc 2 6 d Fg 000111,' , F.F yW Q 1 ' I• O 1 W i ir ma'\= o Me PagePage, ofja„* e5 e£° _ Gulf a 1 S 94 1 I s 14 1 1 sero 1 1 s et 1 I s 09 i 1 S19 / 1 S291 I s c 9 1 1 -4 EXHIBIT"A" PETITION PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 I R 25 E I R 26 E FI C° O 5c61LEE LEE CO 1/ 6 COWER Cd 9 it L...., :), 9 10 12 N i] C.R.888®',-/ LO , 4t5 t) ,6 15 ,4 13l': P a I 1— 22 33 /124 19 /20 21 22 /23 25 m i C.R. 846 A( oil C.R. 846 r NM 1 ' 1 27 28 25 30 29 28 27 26 25ILI5 I f 11 O/ 31 32 33 34 35 36 1 1 a 3s C.R. 862 11 1 Fly 3 1 2 M I 6 5 4 2 J U 0 I 13 10 o 12 2 6 y A 11 1 1 10 j C.R. 896 l C.R. 896 ci Ln 4 I I] o IF, I. 16 7 16 15 14 13 In14a0 01 CC 01 V 1 j1 f a F f"_z3 24 Z 19 n 20 15 o 22 23 24 1- 8 58 's M MOW 27 6 25 VV I 35 36 31 33 38 C.R. 856 JC' I 1-75 3 IJ v S.R. 84 111111111111H1 1 6 5 9 S.R. 84 in 17 13 in MIXED USE & INTERCHANGE 11 1J / 18 1] 71 14 I a 0 ACTIVITY CENTER inZioFINDEXMAP1L.04 1'L Ill 22 23 24 F O l 0 1 MI. 2 MI. 3 MI. 26 25 30 \ 28 27 01 28 25 u _i LTiSCALEU AMENDED - JANUARY 25, 2005 ir 35 36 31 35 36 Ord. No. 2005-03)— AMENDED - JUNE 7, 2005 18Ord. No. 2005-25) Ili6 3\ z AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 Ord. No. 2008-59) AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 M Ord. No. 2011-26) 4 10 II C<,S 12 N L.,, Al 1iii iii N F 13 16 16 15 14 13 PREPARED BY. GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: 1/2016 FILE ACCESS-INDEX-2016.OWG I R 25 E I R 26 E Page 31 of as 1--1-N OPoiUx g UnNWopI- r m; 0 4292 N 2. ` sPlZSZS5a< ' ; S u .Q W w = 3 z Yrz * 6 6 ^N.tB o - m t oEi.. SiJ Y4f , s Z o40o= z o qgIYi6E411opW1 311N3AV 011Jn3 LL E tiC A LA I iI 3A1210 M3M N31NO Q N e U lai J g a u i N LLN a R N U 1 a A a 111111 t mit_FS at 1 a e s:^ My 3 1 b R U U i 3 k I a IVNYO 1 NY3 C'a o)ma ONlllfld-1NOdtlltl D 411zI I I 11 I E Sill I I 1 _ i 1 n j r 00 3tl15tl3AVM55dAO m 6 e' 1 i 1 i1771 p i o a 0 2g 6 ® L7' 41r o a f-o2. lifil000b ff00 o 291 4„;, ....,L„ . 4 I II I i4 j ' " 0 31,1210 NMOMI y,, , 7 N LL i Ill Ido 8. Page 3 of R f4` MO i y 7NUi§0 FKF CO0gu<m sago s< rc Qilld' g ,52 o o C §,rITo # r z o <A < ; Ni ! t g<Z WN W w (5 .`"o< a0 WE iNUf/1 Z Z O NP J w t 30JaJvk,8,,, o ff m m3RZH . 5 O to i w i riO ; , o V X 2grni' w $ y a ikFFe zv a swxdF. o 5aUFtea._ o4aILLiEc6 6olEd 4 gyp, ' k 1 x U a t AtlM 341SN331J__ oi vuiAll grg 4II; E 5 4 ,„,...,x_a_Ri 6 smemoMMin A6I4 O*4 wee ssvHOa3nro AS talkV m E j: ' y i 61 Y E,Pi-G 8 ow 9E lvr 3<rou snl wmu Nrm Nrratvi vr moron s'n1 wuoN vrw imwri j 1 AvEr2161 2 € O 8 O 8= S 8 as is op 4a 4. d 1110 1332. Mt14913 e QA a S 3 0 ® 0 0 age S—of 11 rAf,' o.o 6VYvi-E}\L :} \ k kIt Es,. 2 j //\ § / k IV21k § !| lei w § 2 /I § / \ E \|UQ1 % 2, | Z&aa5 § p @ § a!i eji 1 r......) 0 i O E) OM i ll 6\.. ."-----1 sow L. w i - 2\ 31380 = I @ D•. g CIL 1111E WE i | 3,11:10 m_, jMING/Ns_. I \ av _ 3 q; i | i 11111 2/ hui)\ @ AO 1 2 g} 4. 0 V) cc§- 0 a.g et i 1,00° wx ea \ 71 ®- r Pag of MN n NSE.oFo j1Fz. pEp N g f'eg O: z N C M=scWmt,0 . <o F i 8 skWm ao LI;rc Oil i 4-J Lj J Fi .a ° jo. ) o 1 CA 1 J Zd w m my.z H < INKw o f ef"z °s O o 2 I N o x g <A NfF . ZO E SO wi VU W GaUxa,a 88 0aab 11S o ' g s I W w v. 3 mwsan xwaiu«rx m s..n•oiniwsrx mn,moa sono R w I I, \___ stiej,6 A 9 t a i a i 6 sg s d 9 ri, I i , W 1 ms.. 1 cu ti St llVISMila mm a a iragrr 2 4. t 9y IV 4 I ' F a n e e g 6 9 ii 9 g 7 t1 tit s 4 Page fit i Tazs sn I W 1 w0uQONw, q Z Z411OWOJZ9` U Nw2 Wo = W.UWSWOS OUWffcFFWUmn,18 o 111 : Fs' T 71Wilrar im;MelIp ; j4IIbg4s"vi a MI 1 II Ii1 0 - l. = aft a .Sio P14, 2n 4`,Ti o ii F te 1 0 ,L id K low m..i DII 0,00 1 @ i i cc CIO" mi r s nnnTE I .:. G3 I. 1. ib 1.F nom.,. a • o“ I4, • iii i vi3 P ital ill totz: it Page 3 of p --t gg f{k ! k; E /| a |0u !I q/I § gpb/\ § e lb §VO'±l i § E : c_u: _\l 7._ ,,F, 2 i FMANO Of. 1 VION 1'. 1 Q kmitic o| II j0. f. y 2| ! MEI_,_ | YIN. I d I . : ia ill! . 111111111111 |. NI l 1, i 2tliW62 PI 171111.Iaiif-- , 1 I Pag o= \:. A TNaXooyao6P, jPo. O u j ENaUceKr.ioY. - N.N v, cgi05 CN0NQi "HSI- .Q oi a w 8 ih., Zc € s m JZ ° F" „ S 8WsNWE, 123 R' W E5 o $ 2vwz o18 CAO U V I ac' UN IP 'i 0 -9 htmzopoId9'W ' o o m FmaiZ1ZpZIA- X v pO ZO gO X W W 4 N n `Lot' F z z z a w¢ w s o 'u50aI _ 1 tl S is5M 3JI UL1 013V1Vd - a io cU= a G Wac i E L z e U G= G,, 7g 0< it a a ag LcII- 1- V p U 2= W m i aX o! am C x/a ran ,°°i Ova 1.a12 MI 0.3311. 30020311000° e aan I saa mnn330003w .110e lir 0 s o,. 440 111011 a°a N i a Y p5yy a a s wa.ln awns a t Lailir 6 1 a<i lg 9` 1. r, E Page.4tL.of i 1 g2% ii UolioI aIFM98gwoN mW8t <e0 Q9eoF.9..ax Ooog ylHe =°e< o Vs u o w o o o <6 ` pp2 . a I q NVQ — LLg I gSgz aY W I I W 1 uai ve sw s.s pti 4y PIM XOLESIMII u1ra'3 nu aus,sz. 3 wwan M/. vee g i.vmve v/u i 1 c at iir A , M iD i 1i111 o 4 1i1/1 g — Vis' i erItyr, 11:t E o; a f1TTTT„ 1 = i vi s a 1 111.1{.s' LLL 4v 011111Ia ; i /'''.1"'•s.b, .- - 3 Cr4 1911 1- 1" :11 Lag.= I A'I,Pli14 1u TM... Y11'Ia i sYw. lsw! 0?1 i ") IN Ili — 9 u A tee:II/i- 111111111Ir1 IN . — G f,91111111 c _ • - 1141Ig‘ AmenNE Page 6.1_0i 19 _ - , 77/1/4_4—rIlza. * QorWWr4 LH mzFroo <€---cMWwwWm <No< ; !:oo1.1,Fz, wN W i z S a<o m Y6JOHmO9iyo`a-a8t1 alo raw mf 't oo I s ter-- o ?V a H 1 gi 5t) 2 tl qq gz 4 ga 4 main 5 qq piBd„ Ek I Nrogf WI xm Yet ars I. 6e1 Ar Fr 1 i0 Is 1for 9 1 WU e W a 1_ da QQ1„IIIIII.N/1 a1 1 ill\ I iiii • ' 8 s: L.: 1181t Q 1 I. v coi., 1111111111111 y68b 1/111N C • dLtiv,,,_„„.>. W E d b 5 pram_ air Ill IIIII m m iP 01,...AMI J i.,,.g o , 1 Il/nmumilunn YI ii, „ 1 a e ! 1 a 1/\IIIIIIIIIIL1111111ME: 9 : 1 alInIlOrgi. Isisidour .. nnmY G k R YN Y aimalr' u p w Is4. itionimily0 +/ c- .111111111111111'1111111 1 I r a 1 * MIN PM D IIJi11UI1iIIaqirc,)0,,, iniii::? a z,vo num A A al rn ID 10.:.1...... i.,:111 111%. t‘ IEIMMM i nig i11 awl \ " n 1 III I i 01 i% 111111111 7,, Page AL of 71 A EONNeyzWal0eofop11IN2CCO ! 1I Q iH NQvoOaoNNW6iHil!iFO dZIz WO z. oo I 6V o 6aUFemDa -pp p jaLLom= v ii'. ew, itoi1/ 4. 4. 4:01 .• i 7". -- ,,,,,,, ' Y ; 1m11.•"' 0.311100 Vati Ze a a¢ 0 &400 i 1 0 110" 2I toilp /s P ei Ole'TO 1 9 3 i I No E I. 5 Q i ; w i S 11 ir a e 211 y§ 1 y 7 N.i W a ;i 1 Non Y on ir 7I- a — Il 311V1 T.006114 W s 11111M,innaoodA n.l ; 111111in _IIiIillIII a 1 Q — WiammsuUU H gimminu..uuni MICHIsiii V ® a n o 0. ifi Page of7I ro 1. yNPodggeNWjFUKito-r W " o_ JbHG3SWwrJa ! ,% 3g8 f/ N W vC idow oWW. f c 2? two x s`b WwLi a a o iriSIilloe i'- ' V 1" 3%1 13dWn5t 5'. E^ 1R' a aaYd VONVaVOVr im NV1 13111V03i m l'` i ,$ linI 3LY0 a30NY310 0 p - m OVON 350a OOVellfl dnl3awane!' U a Mzi oa41°4 Mgt y aa mt° L': i 11as ! MOaneur icg ea i ltlNtlO I IVNVO IYNVO If'a0) ma ONI rind-ldodbltl If H3) OtlOa ON(llnd-laOdalV — III ill I a= a €a illi 4s li ir= Me 1- k ,..\,k 1 i $ 0Cal 413 1 P 'L illi i /int a s Silli a 1 as 3AING l3ann AYe a® 9 s mato IIaYLs ` 4 m t W .i WI14 incom b1s,Milts=ekil`/', a LcO ails E H w 319813 1I3Y15 \ \ e iarw 1 i IO i yy, m14 10,1411. Ntl 9 °E ON JAS4SNIJNO3tle vir44/11)\ Page 9H of M ii j0NNogift5ErmNW! G g 4giw H aro, vS wsa -0 1zi 64g2 O i o <zQ oF > d o mw oZ m 66.N I ma oz. sem,_// 00.5am»] nae e 1 p4: I U x,na,r wm 8 ulI v. 1I 21 le la IP 4""... v.-2,, 1 1 i ' , l'a 1 __ 4v n)wa xxvu-3u3wm IIIIII 4 6J11111111110 ii " ' "i A# .4 3I1 y 16Y3 6 k En ll'ali ..mg E IF, -. ....0 iii,vat 1 W . Ilk s.*0111 tea ii nos'"`I`m w1"'° X111 1 ma 111:411113114" 4p _ "e ii".-1 iiii ''4 4^ ais,011\11k0\111 it 1.IL,4 P e1/ 106a n ii1OPO 11 pm NM I!FI1 Ot W o NIMBI N M i i i 4 rein... .11! i,. IIIIII 111111 11.11 11111 lu xN mw.... MI It 1 al xi ,,., ...IN 1••••••••Emmu 4,, ii, ii., v .T• ra :Firm ra k • Iu.u11u11mm 1Ii' I a 11111111111Mi s`: el i• Iii R411111 0 IN mull N It iyi 4. rob . lim no:1111 i o` •4011, Dv ift ala g Al APx . 9' 4atil0 ,40alEli II AilliWietWalliMI rI •eimm 11111111. via as Illi Ih 0 9 NpEr 11 ,1 %,A Eli 8 1 \ i 0117. 11... / 01/0////ide,+ ••a1ll11e Page Ag. of It 4-aNa- < ovA WMMoNIs,w ,,a10 * g O iNCNE5 gOa. M C - mefjaa2c01 \ Z ;,b, j u =d411 .i o i m ayea fgClit Za zI 11401N I atWN3a:U a.T8o41Ra ¢ a za. II1IIIIIIIS_ 5 1511 HMO ' K i it y 01%1 li W p 1 t S C K v ! 1Ott li ar 1 a _ o I 1 6 i ano_ IJ i 11111111111111111/,st----, K '- 414 4 DA 111111111111 11111111111111/z 1ii111E11MMI10211116 UM TOO(MI 111 I 1.11. 111rell C al Me lid la i I la larlirl x 13 MN in i6. 1lpaI,Bei# i 41111 D, i- 1. 1 l. i 2,ili iiiiirk n3In, i 16I/ 1t11,, 1„ 1ii iiia a a 4 ... p, mi EN num_1 illl {7 l o- irkAtititd. v11 ±... _ iT, . I ,- 0 r 8 Page of.22:, ei Ni r61._.,iIX0zAr \ a.K z | !N (! u R |e § g Zpj k il ) 25g0 1' g ! 202 | au«2§ / / 1 1 @ I li x1 j®wLf4 I 1 I I If I g 1§ 1 I 5| i I g! 1.• lo• I R I I lI2I I St . ! | s2113 531.11 on,_ 1 a _ =@! Ia 1I . 1 | f a * 12 *1 IMIIIIML 133.5 Hl. 1 / 11154 1 I 1 n 11 El 133H15.. I I-1 fag Alof Ao3YNatCOIa eoW8rNMmgIH>o 1 Z $ < FONaOFoWa218q >N a Nzw8 J o (no W w p< > z z u N V o3zzJzipJmOSro4,8VWZWVFwzSVOGhtoa ` o 4 I ma€"- - toi_00 ml=or. if va simipp,. 0 .......E.,- % . 1 031 .0 . . su swi .4 at oll IIangmisilli •010111 v1um e 3 M ice 00 A•/ ,. °00U0011 MI z4Awa s""""' '*°.*' SI11114 , I 11* : 2 4 , so * iz M53 NW — * 441), i V 4P,,„.4 4 ‘ 01.11 WI 0LLX 14: w 4 t.IIIRoma0 kmsiii to 4 4** j F ww..6 E:ttdII I14,±„,: 0.,44" 4. w sl 0*\* MT PYtlML NWS CO III II 111. EM •. i f ® C) MN Kai 4:.' 111111 pp mm a.NNN LL rf11114111111 rim AMMONIUM s a ii4 ail Fi:fl!. l III 0i:t/ -, I1• ..dI 1 I taw Page of . a 10 < o0 0 0 za01ail_ U7 °z ai rcwMrlDOOoF " r m a mtV R "'„.S7. K m 1 ,t Z m H La,' - Z <loLaWW8ao o W w i= a'< w oNu < W O d N W 2 Z S rc ry iwJ ` nLitd ^ d O N O J U ,".4 d m 1roO /_ O W wr V J dA N o c mFf , 0 O 00 Q W SLLI wW- O rcd `LU U Q I 1T a o1poCbE• Ne OM Ie. O, m g r1 ii. 2 X 3 5 4 S U d a g Y s4 gg Uoarxoxi0 d`es4 ° , m m.. S ° ti. I LI piiii ii I CI o I r vx awe wInn IlL fa1- J 140 tl9 44> I, I Al IISX MI Q 1 g 41 a 1:11 0 I ° It 1 cA2 Et A IIOa ir' ill.'1 rr r" " rrrr in 9 N °. I.,mi 111111 iniiiim s-o .... im. ML... 7A!!!!k .' o = mill G — —0— -3— r mmmm L7-.IHIIlIAH- P a 41, o • O S1q U.NK11P1111111111 !m 1 o iggii tom 1.1. Initmuecrini==ims 1,6...„ , ,.„., ..0.-Trup I ig if) prZ. 671t3 LI T` IT, _ _ T 1 i t T T _ T• 6 I I irmi...67.1!....72.-1 t' id. 61 rilihdilig ritialS ii 111611 iii 1 7 mow° =gm m s I OII I10 f 'A r 1 rf F- 1 • E11112IIILIQ I A LL; § s i .IBJ9—_ - — 1 a rw-- ss T O Pagel _ofj 1 iontiWngisAF LEIuN 'a zsiwo :n yFiWxmNOicow -' a P:25:::Z w I Z m g~N . o N3 y0JWQabWwi Hw o CoaVrtwiNWzzoa< 2 teOV gz"" 2 a iw c RPf :O Z J z°zdraww0axs-- o u cwawwNW0QIC? HW ifejl. qj ,.i 0,,,, oil t cccc ® s O 4.41t4 u a 8- 8,:%<'. 68A' 1'-:i tl d€ ' LL is p t?i © 0* 0,, Asiat OUVA3V109 IItlMMy i i i2 u Ilg..,,,ti 1'-'§ 74#„,,,,, m U tpP N all *NW ac.4144.* v4i 14 Iv tij 1. 0iiii 111.1 i i 3:11•00001. -11, i 1:7„,,,, ,,„ : i L LL d\ N.s,E 110110: a''a„, i11. m s I ME4,, V:#,• AI NM iM INN4"01110 um \ 41111 t d /iii OQ' -. Am . .. w R 0 MPS NTO i III d1I II v,mini ea Imo 9 i IE ArI17-1717eiled115.W.1. i III** w > a MI. Mil .. Vgill1* 3 M. .. .. i Page 5O of 12 M i ffil—l-1aOomNV0N1z6iQQIjJNO g Wig R< 1' W SAKMuFjWi b O LL SNNC,NNWN • t# Ni w 1 c 0 z i-1 1 g km28i2Y' Jo am Z g `-moo- w T3 IoWaERi_ce 0R W c ,,F,o ` 'c E i 3'-V 3 ; a o a m o g i g a i 3 0 ea8zmZLLzWISt301m410FJCAoo` mo o`J Fo`aH l§rr W. aF F gv z zv g s No o Y w aicU< F a a a a_ oaII1it illC? 0 I g i 6 g C 4111Ir 4: . AM/ / 4:14111C-N„II c II I;I4, 41 III NE E.` liar"e4/11111111111110 zJP44 F a 11111111111111111111144803 a p EjStl LI_ U p OE 1 7 mnvs 0 4N . © Ay- 4, 3 ? VIC ii, e.../i,'' l Di AUL i'\i*4 111RM F.!. i ,,, . 0.1 2'FA!!t nV, w Page51of "1`1 N ? a o wIPNo rjw6F< 8kw V SAre1Nrw?119 1 11; mgOgdt N ncvCV2 ,, a V Z IH!d JiCAV-1 6k.o <3 00 a?b9,`,f,..1-,?,z zrom3 4 St M i P 16 1 k Alp winii11114'r • MY i oli111111 o ,•A 11'-'1111401 11;;;;;;;..;;;;;:41 X11 11 1111111111111111111• - . 2 6.11 A nnnnnnnum Y1\p11111 I,IIIu1 i mmummi : . 1 f 1:vi . .uun nnnnnuuuun` . p pso0 . . mo. 111111111111111111111 1, I ,1 g .gmWM Sae. v'-. titi4 : 58b1100N1 n ! ,o_IIII 1 11IroCNIYCOCNImpiriillHIHH•U`LJ m 11oiiiIUill o Nre N Ill In to,11 III r IIIII Lit y MINIM I--I--- im ° I' 1 =' r 1111111111111111111111111111 WCC 1.11ON u-o•. '' 1.ri illi —° 1IIIIII1111111111 apnnnmmil(111.1111EllOPIP :,- 41'EINO01LL it it Kw iLL 11111111 m a u co n II I !P X Z 1 1CI y f;Si =-'I 1111111111111111!111111111111 1I- w —Iii. —F -t it- 1111 tal -1 Z sr-7,•••=$' 44$51:74K1A4Pti I ' PA., - 3 1 I 1 1I 11„`111 6 Z 111111 1It N IIII LinifttillriMI 111.1.. III,r 1111 IIII.` I l Z 111 II iya 411; 11 1E=• IMINiiIIII all W in f it N x ri`k' 10 C- . ! 11I# iUfta,.E RI ce ill E ru marircr trIll fir_ 4 1Q satire l J'`1 Litiv rAlb -e .iii j ililll 'il'1.1.. O'i' 4,1tkt fejerfoi • is 3 rt riii rill 'tali, rlw,,,,n r v- m 1`rNI1" 6 6 gR O 1p1 17a. O 3 1 1 1 gig lit 1 01 I 5 617 1MONIcna _ IIIMIHIIIII1I11_ __0 —I'.1 IIIIII11111114=1111Fif11111.1 111i:111111• i -N ,' I_d:h NENEN11nnnnnnIIIIII.p 1 Buuuuu ti1 'A iilllI.illlllll T Illlii{Illilllllillllll i a MeZ1111a11; i.'.r. o F_ J J IIWW J 1I1r!1 Iinsiss11111111 IIIIIIII_III itis fimi Illllllll Illllil III1n 111111111 F LwIIIap11i otf1._ I.' iia e re ee YI 11______x -__ r., P _ N p__f OnCC _4"' ui 1 J . '--`. j.JuIuuil in...... mgN111111111111...„1111111111 1111111111111. i Aim qv. J l N II1111hIIIUIIllllllllllllll4liF 1t 4.;._,.._41 Cy a a', -- 1 ii a'- 1-111 J60lb LS i WCOaCOON 91a Ocr " O W LL W II t11111.111m W J .w I= LN H .Illlllllllllllk-f IIIA 1:IIIIIIaII 111E i O LL F z< 1.1huu11 I1111111II11111111 III fill 9111R 110 11111111111111u1 11'Id1111 !m.i._na a C O re ! oat; 11 11,1.=no (11111111111111 1111111// `,,I11111111111=-5111111,111 m — a 3 O 01 11/1.111111 j' 11IWMI. 111 I ?,U IiI 1l 1 Irl :i111111111161..:1111 11 - III lEil...kaina1- kr3, -- _ gl_kmitlitii., in O z $ IW1! II' t--ti.. 0 u O fnlainnnI1I ..;'l I!0[/ Jb . - nits.-- == i 11i LLLA`moig 41. 11 J[1 i1 ,!;=,:1211,111 riq• > waFl1.11 a 1 iii N i...g ill 1'---. 1116 1 u1J. / W L W s u ns _ F II_ VIIIin 1-l noin SS J 11 n, Ivan I vs- n 1 cc W W i "`/„///111111 IInHlgt111111111 " I 1 j 41. 11 a (T ',,t Irl; tc m Nu . et ,4 4' IS ICL IA sl 1 1 i,.rr J IIS r L,.I' I( ' --.J.1.-: o. , -- ,,,, iki X1%-.4- 610: V; 1 i' itra. phirolii 5 G h z I I I III ( 1 III III Iii 1 1 T 45 5 I its Page> of 5OS10NIdCLUnr0c0N1 _:1_ IILI 11r.--I::1-::.—11 11! grallUMNIMUM7.9•1 MECLNIII I.ie_Il:: 1 INEWIlil II m kl IJ I 1 iiniiiiiiiiii mrio I1 i I: i W i0 ro =W t1 i0 vi. r ‘ --) .- fU In m 1\ni 44in 111 i _In ifr, - ,la IIIIMEENPE--111:11uIll a — la r? Qm-.1111111111111_.,.__23 m .. Ct 111 11::111I C_i_ E1s ' r' . 1 I ' ' --- LJf1 Lll l' i x. 44'a1:.v_._.o a: Q W LL Z ;1-. 50- 1 IIII Ip1ililu 1 II11i i H Q F'II 7:11 : II _+,_ `F- Li Lu Q Z u N I,y.---- mar CI1l t m 110 W a' a ERtJI i 1 ' ii A tri z b1IW1Nve1a'. iu W Z 7' .4in .a w sai'G , I I ;Ira! 1 I 1 •• W d'9 ail .1 p x r- i F 1 N I!1 111 ii 6:1 1); '•h = - L'Ar +in cr W Ada 1. FA IrIIIla...,111'1 !V cc Rip-IOC--I ii---- i.-:- L'i.:-—. S::Zriii, 4. Mall ®al _utoia1111,illi t i yy 111 1/: ~...../ Illllm®®(. Iliiill111 aFP f iia1I/// i. nn( ui illnnu"I.uiiiis fl —>i, linW 11 11 11111111111111.7 12 um., —.....;.m...7 Ann 111111 11 mintpp111ii1111111 11111111::ij e V.. IdOlt gay'! O pili111a1i p a a €z t pp c A 7 e 1 1a ..; Page of_71 4 ft 11 o I 5 15 IM0NICLU-C>MCONMONIJZ 11a111111"Frpo0 oicifi! i w ui N:Nrkii‘lg. 1 111 Rt D• 4,r '`! /w iii Aim tit 0 JAN' 7,_i,... .ice 1 47,17P111111 11111 k litior,,, J uo IIS r" 1 rrpror N LL LL W iiin 11i# 1: 11.1 w = l7 _121 11 Q 1 3zre Cad a-3 LILINIVAMIII \ikicp .,... 0 Ws, X Q I- Emu i.W Z EFAM L. III 0 . „ AM1=11--Milk, T,-; 0 jA N Mg 7 if,101 ,, 6:1111111. 41.----- s- 141111- 11.1111--- X y vAiroMP11111111r W 0,,,.. ier opir4rilkirr pipoopo— rpi000 w inu, Pt/fll cc aT' i r& 9 41L\ 1 15 CA CA Page. ¢of7-----i- N - r 6 1 1 L !LI! v ! H br la f.. o III wxo; EXHIBIT"A" PL201300026371CPSP-2013-11 paw COLLIER COUNTY RURAL WAARoSH P OVERIAAY4MAP AREA ASSESSMENT STE_ aU °S i ;It v 0'2oT S/tg1 N_ s 910 023:0 NNII,, 0 A 9 1- T° ':° . lirTin_ iL'pn-. wi,j,:"'" 1:: 4,.;';ift."1-!.-: pis:-.:i: 1 1;1;';,, 44/ 4`:., . nrey, or' q-4 , 0,;0,.? C:20, 41‘,..or lir t- ' A.#:"6,, , ,_ , - IMMOKALEE I F OV11Vgy Stew r' ly: H:y A..'pall61 1 D '"tom 4 a o, 1 T ut...- w!s r Y I I L AVE MARIA S WRA A m 1 ksst.1 SRA . 10 A N , O T FSA W q 4‘SSA V i ' `3 iiiiIr., j OIL WELL RD d tL fr\''''''''.-1 b. fe-Or /7. .... -4,1 02:10 ' a Aw '.10,e40,p GOLDEN GATE BLVD r roff}j1 Iiir, . r'Y.',d/Pks.sti,. d NSI ' 0 Y jj 1 imilimiiim AME4000-JANUARY 20.2007 Ord,Ra 2007-18) legend_ AAt,11000-OCTOBER 14,2008 Ord.No.7008-80) aT' Open INI900RRwIp.Wn0uns AMENDED-SEPTEMBER 13.2011 WYNr RMenknn Area tARA) N.Qannl PurestOrdNo.2011-28) BID Cypress O F0T0V8 BlewanleNp Are.(021A) r--1,„„,0,Cre.M Bele C000UW Habitat BlewertNNp Ares(HSA) =BI.weNddp Receiving Arae(BRA) PREPARED BY;019/000 MN.POW SECTION 0 00 1 1 3 GROWTH MANAGEMENT 010300/MANNING AN0 REGULATION BI.Wwdsidp BendingA».(05*) DATE;8/2015 PIE:CCRAAABOM-2015.050 Page 5./..,ofi.[° N E a82I (0 E_E `43 m , 0 3C75p2r° o E u ,048 E cao c L 8 m aya N Li3 'n I1cIfl 1i glv @ 32mmq2u8damm28Cw UEU' LL S U843Z y a L c m Y c o o2aNa'N a 3.0 y d .22v15m ("Ti Z Q 1O@2Ea2E4g`_m E ' a p2qEELoEU y E ov S $ N 2 N . 4 8 8 of u N N gyi N E N ' N um n313_ E ZN E I8 ° ySytltlaa C 1, CIfnNf. 2 y T N O1 _ E C — N a G C C o ° N Q m E _ m a am coE v m E N 8 m4= m.E E a N > H c o^ .0 o f Y c o o a U Q Eo N V E 0 iE ifcc ya£ g o tP 0a en N uco ° mm o 02EacvmN agmeN y N 9 c W m N cF, c ZO g...7 yEy $ E c LLN C D edaiwc .E Nco n R DoE F9 g c0E tO. o O U c U H o D_ c n Q 19 iq P v o a a 8UN ` o U a o E_y a m Q U b n 0 • coL 73 E g g o wE >, ma liX ' O .0 g m gg d E 0 3 0 3 co E 8$ i 11 C) teay) v E `" i .0 n o n r ry0 C . ° E m `o c - pa. Q L w 2 y2u Ufl L . Dkf N G_ Ue E { G NUN N J1 a C Eca° o c mSrnEm .'2,o d 'E a.t o fn O N N c+ F- o dp a 3, ci o v p 7 o g LL o . a di'o to 0 0 0 N$ W 9 5'N U' 2 N 8 O' d C '5-E K LL 5 o O- U C 0 ggO b g U 1 t c a a•a w 2. E$ O U Z O N _N,2, cas ` 4. it "s g q gc 5F- N E i m r 06= ii _ c o N a s E' nd 24 8 ,4• 712' , g S g m cts g .m S", c N. c o iisN k sq oo ` ' F., N CEC e c W a1 i`y <,c a I ori, G a V L co tcE .c o C Y i 0 g is E •-• y 8 ct c o " u. w E O Q Q N k UC- 5 m 61 g 'c E N 8 --U U 8Yc €$ CIy _ ii l o m E LL yE v 1a£E a Z> - 5 H - e € E I4' o E E n> v g S N K 0 yy yyy1 yy ce 0 N C G Q y O gyp/ 4, C c - v re I m slintVj E N R a S m S o c g 12 E n 2 an N Yco E E to t gC7 2 dF z d No a c 0 5 0 " v R"a e, of Staff Proposed GMP Amendments GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 EXHIBIT "A" GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN (GGAMP) FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Updated map, following GGAMP text] Include the updated Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map labeled as, and included in, this Exhibit "A".] PLEASE NOTE: Approval of amendments to this Element is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear—within and between Elements—as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document. Page..51 of_21 DRAFT Words underlined are added;words ctruck through are deleted. 1 LEGEND p URBAN DESIGNATION ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION 0 N EES USE=MGT LUXES USE OWES. RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA DISTRICT URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT RESDENT,ESTATES SUmSTSCT HIGH pEN9ry RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT CONDITION,USES SDBDISTRIEr OVERLAYS AND GOLDEN GATE AREASPECIALFEATURES DOMNTONA CENTER COMMERCIAL SUBCISTRICr El CNBORITOOD CENTER SUBDISTRICT RESOURCE PROIEECTICN MEAAOYWUYRRAL SSIE""A`°"""`T FUTURE LAND USE MAP1.MD.USE AMITY CENTER SUBDISTRICT ° TI w T m NEA MSSON SUBDISTRICT 1 RENS L pfOLlu SUBDISTRICT N COMMERCIAL 5 E-RANDAu DENSITY BAND SANTA BARBARA COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICTME GNP.) ONSESQAL DISTNCT DERCE cca& ,Z sMBEra"T'" NONO SSE ELEMEN NNONO COMER BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT E 00cE ROAD MINED USE SUBDISTRICT IMMOKALEE ROAD RANDALL BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT iNWtiT 9JCIWALISTRIIFRN ESTATES l CO N. rgiAMASAATESCOMMERCIAL DEED StrairCT SAJMBROONE OFFICE SUBDISTRICT NOTE MIS MM CANNOT BE INTERPRETED MMCUT ME EDAM ON.ECTVES POLICIES AND LAND USE DESICNAROM OEYCRIPTON SWOON OF ME EDIOEN GATE AREA EAMES PLAN. 0 Ti) ma CO OIL WELL ROAD EI O0w IMMOKALEE ROAD 1 z RANDALL BOULEVARD 0 r. SUBJECT j SITE q 3 CPSP-2013-11 aP7 VANDERBIL\ i— WBEACHROADG Fi G OU GOLDEN GATE I-. cfiBOULEVARD ZEla0U PINE RIDGE RD.WHITE BLVD. CEMMA22 a VI ¢> G C C o coF OZ a o a w mw a G.G. PKWY. - O EO F. O O O ac w DI GA LA m INTERSTATE_yg S.R.84 1 E.Za DAVIS BOULEVARD m S.R.84 a a a cp< U1 o x a W3 o Al 7 PO a 4f? A Ir GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ADOPTED - FEBRUARY.1991 AMENDED - DECEMBER 4,2007 ORD.NO.2007-77 0 AMENDED - MAY/9,1992 AMENDED - OCTOBER 14.2008 W6 AMENDED - MAY 25.1993 ORD.N0.2008-59 AMENDED - JULY 27,1993 AMENDED - JULY 28,2010WI.]] - ORD.NO 2010-31 17 AMENDED - APRIL 12,1994 AMENDED - JULY 28,2010 2 r AMENDED - MARCH 14,1995 ORD.NO.2010-32 M} AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 14,2011 AMENDED - OCTOBER 27.1997 080.NO 2011-29 0F. AMENDED - APRIL 14,1998 AMENDED - NOVEMBER 18,2014 p ORD.NO.2014-41 PO AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 8.1998 W AMENDED-NOVEMBER 10,2015 AMENDED - FEBRUARY 23.1999 (Ore.No.2015-82) Ca AMENDED MAY 2000 CI) AMENDED - MARCH 13,13,2001 AMENDED - MAY 14,2002 A AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 10,2003 SCALE ORD.NO.2003-44 AMENDED - OCTOBER 26.2004 I I I I Page.....2_.of090.No.2004-71 0 1 MI. 2 MI. 3 MI. 4 MI. 5 MI. AMENDED - JANUARY 25,2005 ORO.N0.2005-3 PREPARED BY:GIS/CAD MAPPING SECTION NUARY 25,200] GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AMENDED - JA ORD.N0.NUARY9 DATE: 1/2016 FILE: CPSP-2013-11-1.DWG I R 26 E I R 27 E I R 28 E I Staff Proposed GMP Amendments STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT (SM) Update and make current the Table of Contents, along with corresponding titles, heading and other entries— inside and between Elements —to maximize internal consistency. II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES GOAL 1: Reference text only, page 2] TO PROVIDE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES AND SERVICES FOR DRAINAGE AND FLOOD PROTECTION FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, MINIMIZE THE DEGRADATION OF QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATERS AND SURROUNDING NATURAL AREAS AND PROTECT THE FUNCTIONS OF NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS. text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 6: Revised text, page 4] Protect the functions of natural drainage features through the application of standards that address the quality and quantity of discharge from stormwater management systems. Implementation of this text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.2: Revised text, page 5] Collier County's retention and detention criteria shall be one hundred and fifty percent (150%) of the water quality volumetric requirements provided in the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume 11 for use within the Geographic Limits of the South Florida Water Management District (2014), e e.- - -_ e Policy 6.3: Allowable off-site discharge rates shall be computed using a storm event of 3 day duration and 25 year return frequency. The Land Development Code includes a list of off-site discharge rates by basin. The allowable off site discharge rates arc as follows: 0.11 cfs/acre 124, Airport Road North Canal 0.04 cfs/acrc Sub basin North of Vanderbilt Beach Road) e._ ___ • _- _0.06 cfs/acrc Sub basin South of Vanderbilt Beach Road) C-4 Basin 0.11 cfs/acrc Cocohatchcc River Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre f, __ 0.04 cfs/acre g Cypress Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acrc Faka Union Canal Basin 0.09 cfs/acre North of I 75) Gordon River Extension Basin 0.09 cfs/acrc DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted. 1 Page: //_1ej W_. r Staff Proposed GMP Amendments STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 t Harvey Canal Basin 0.011 cfs/acre k Henderson Creek Basin 0.08 cfs/acre h 175 Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre m: Imperial Drainage Outlet Basin 0.12 cfs/acrc n Island Walk Basin 0.055 cfs/acrc aka Harvey Basin) e, hely-Can-a-1-Bas-i44 0.06 cfs/acrc 0.06 cfs/acrc q, _ __ e-- __ - __ _ __ -0.04 cfslacre Palm River Canal Basin 0.13 cfs/acrc s Dine Ridge Canal Basin 0.13 cfslacrc t A ii other areas 0.15 cfslacro The County may exempt projects from these allowable off-site discharge rates if any of the following applies: 1. The project is part of an existing SFWMD permit, which allows discharge rates different than those listed above. 2. It can be documented that the project currently discharges off site at a rate higher than those listed above. The documentation required for this-purpose shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer, and will consist of an engineering study which utilizes the applicable criteria in the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume 11 for use within the The study shall be subject to review and approval by the County and SFWMD staff. The study shall include the following site-specific information: a. Topography b. Soil types and soil storage volume c. Vegetation types d. Antecedent conditions e. Design rainfall hydrograph f. Depression storage capacity g. Receiving water hydrograph, and the higher off site discharge rate. PLEASE NOTE: Approval of amendments to this Element is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear-within and between Elements-as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted.2 Page 6 s-,of=„,,, Staff Proposed GMP Amendments TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT-BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 EXHIBIT "A" TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT (TE) Update and make current the Table of Contents, along with corresponding titles, heading and other entries— inside and between Elements— to maximize internal consistency. LIST OF TABLES/MAPS/FIGURES For informational purposes only, introductory page iv] TR-1 * Financially Cost Feasible Transportation Plan Network and Traffic Circulation Map — Year 2035 2040 TR-2 * Total Transportation Needs Pia-14 Assessment Projects Map—Year 2035 2040 TR-3 * Collier 2 2013 Functional Classification — Countywide Map TR 3A 3.1 * Collier 2025 2013 Functional Classification — Inset Map (Coastal North) TR-3.2 *Collier 2013 Functional Classification — Inset Map (Orangetree Area) TR-3.3 *Collier 2013 Functional Classification — Inset Map (Immokalee Area) TR-3.4 *Collier 2013 Functional Classification — Inset Map (Coastal Central) TR-3.5 *Collier 2013 Functional Classification — Inset Map (Coastal South — Marco Island Area) TR-4 * South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) Map TR-5 * Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) Map TR-6 * East Central Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) Map TR-7 * Collier County Hurricane Evacuation Routes Map TR-8 * Strategic Intermodal System (SISI Facilities Map TR-9 * Regional Transportation Network Map text break *** *** *** *** *** A. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS Revised text, page 1] 1. Travel Demand The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan's Financially Cost Feasible Plan and Needs Assessment Plan as adopted on December 10, 2010 11, 2015, are hereby incorporated to define the major roadway needs for Collier County. The 2035 2040 Financially Cost Feasible Plan is presented as Map TR-1 and shows the needed roadway improvements that can be funded through the year 2035 2040. Map TR-2 shows the total projected roadway improvements needed by 2035 2040. Note that the Financially Feasible Plan docs not include be funded from reasonably anticipated revenues. While the total 2035 2040 needs are estimated to require funding of approximately 4,56 2.3 billion dollars, the cost feasible plan reflects funding of approximately 602 million 1.2 billion dollars. 0--0.- ' - Transportation Study prepared by the MPO as additional data and analysis. Map TR 1 also serves as the Traffic Circulation Map that presents the number of lanes on Collier County Roadways in 2035. Map TR-3 and Inset Maps TR-3.1 through TR-3.5 shows the existing functional classification of the roadways - •e _e A •_ •- _ _ - in the County. The refinement of these plans maps to incorporate updates to the MPO's Plan, development of a collector road system and results of corridor specific studies, shall occur on a regular basis upon approval of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC). DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted. 1 Page ( of - Staff Proposed GMP Amendments TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. Five-year Capital Facility Program Revised text, page 2] The Collier County Transportation Work Program is reported annually in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for future five-year planning periods. The improvements shown in the AUIR represent a sub-set of the needs identified in the Collier County 2035 2040 Needs Plan Assessment Projects (Map TR-2) and are included in the current Capital Improvement Element (CIE) Schedule of Capital Improvements, as amended annually, for funding within the next five years. 4. Future Traffic Circulation Map Series — 2035 Future Traffic Circulation Map Section 163.3177(6)(b)(1), Florida Statutes requires a map or map series showing the general location of the existing and proposed transportation system features. This map series present the following: number of future funded road lanes and other improvements on each facility; roadway functional classifications; and multi-modal facilities (ports, airports, and rail lines). Map TR-1, (-Tthe 2035 2040 Financially Cost Feasible Transportation Plan Network,) serves as the 2035 Traffic Circulation Map showsing the funded road improvements through 2040, including number of road lanes, sidewalks and bike lanes - - - - •- -• —e - —e- • '_-- - . Map TR-3 shows the 2025 existing roadway functional classifications, and Map TR-8 shows the multi-modal facilities in the County. text break *** *** *** *** *** B. INTERMODAL & MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION Revised text, page 3] 1. Non-Motorized Travel text break *** *** *** *** *** The Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan, developed by the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff, was adopted by the... text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. Mass Transit Revised text, page 6] a. Purpose text break *** *** *** *** *** The Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) program is coordinated by Collier County, which has been designated as the Coordinated Provider by the Naples Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization MPO). The TD services offer home pick up and delivery transportation for the elderly, handicapped, and economically disadvantaged in the County. text break *** *** *** *** *** C. PERSPECTIVES text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. Inter-agency Coordination Cooperation Revised text, page 8] In Collier County, the responsibility for providing transportation facilities rests with several different agencies. Long range transportation planning is the primary charge of the Naplcs (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). text break *** *** *** *** *** Introduction: Revised text, page 11] text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck gh are deleted. Page (!9` Of 2 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 The Collier County Transportation Element meets the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes (FS), the "Community Planning Act". The County has coordinated this Transportation Element with the Long Range Transportation Plan of the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization MPO). text break *** *** ** *** *** OBJECTIVE 3: Revised text, page 13] Provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights-of-way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program, Board approved development agreements, and/or the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, plans and programs. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 3.1: Revised text, page 13] The County h- implemented and shall maintains an advanced Right-of-Way Preservation and Acquisition Program. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 3.5: Revised text, page 14] A. The County is considering the viability of a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP) ordinance and land development regulations that: 1. identify, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway network shown on the County's Long Range Transportation Plan, Board approved development agreements, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, plans and programs; and text break *** *** *** ** *** All of the above must be consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, agreements, plans and programs, and Chapter 336.02, Florida Statutes. text break *** ** *** *** *** Policy 5.5: Revised text, page 17] Commercial developments within the South US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification to the Transportation Planning Department County transportation planning agency that at least four (4) of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized: text break *** *** *** *** *** Residential developments within the South US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation shall provide documentation to the Transportation Planning Section that at least three (3) of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized: a) Including neighborhood commercial uses within a residential project. b) Providing transit shelters within the development (shall be coordinated in coordination with Collier County Area Transit). c) Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities with connections to adjacent commercial properties. d) Vehicular access to adjacent commercial properties with shared commercial and residential parking. An applicant seeking an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation through the certification mentioned above shall submit an application to the Transportation Division Administrator DRAFT Words underlined are added;words st through are deleted.Page c05 01,' tet 3 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 County transportation planning agency on forms provided by the Division agency. Binding commitments to utilize any of the above techniques relied upon to obtain certification shall be required as a condition of development approval. Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three (3) years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three (3) years of development if they are deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be made within this second three year period and subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment shall be completed within three (3) years and in three (3) year increments until the TDM strategies are deemed effective. Policy 5.6: The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that provide multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in this Transportation Element, and Policies 4-3 1.5.A and 4-:4 1.5.B of this the Capital Improvement Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are designated: A. Northwest TCMA-This area is bounded by the Collier- Lee County Line on the north side; the west side of the 1-75 right-of-way on the east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side; and, the Gulf of Mexico on the west side (Map TR-5). B. East Central TCMA - This area is bounded by Pine Ridge Road on the north side; Collier Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side, and; Livingston Road (extended) on the west side (Map TR-6). In order to be exempt from link-specific concurrency, developments within the TCMA must provide documentation to the Transportation Planning Department that at least two (2) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies utilized meet the criteria of the LDC. Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three (3) years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three (3) years of development if they are deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be made within this second three year period and subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment shall be completed within three (3) years and in three year increments until the TDM strategies are deemed effective. Policy 5.7: Each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards described in Policies 1,3 1.5.A and 4-4 1.5.13 of this the Capital Improvement Element. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.1: Revised text, page 19] The Transportation Element shall incorporate to the greatest degree possible, the long range plans of the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization. text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 11.3: Revised text, page 24] The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has assisted... c DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck eare deleted.Page 6 42 o a 4 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 12.1: Revised text, page 24] The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization, through the Transportation Disadvantaged Program shall assist... Policy 12.2: The County Transportation Division and the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization shall coordinate... text break *** *** *** *** *** Tables/ Maps / Figures Updated maps, following TE text] Transportation Map Series, maps TR— 1 through TR— 6, TR—8. text break Include the actual updated maps labeled as, and included in, this Exhibit "A".] PLEASE NOTE: Approval of amendments to this Element is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear—within and between Elements—as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words strusk-through are deleted. Page VI dz..dz.. 5 g„ ,.,Z ill tom? inz z I,'2 0• aZoWOQ' n Q w O21 NO LSONINII amwNOlSOAllot1ceIO03 J z a ONlllfld121OdiIIV w t o 4 ' I m 0 a• 021)INV),H-3LL310000 k 1211 ThVINIVJ . r HO11I813ONVA SHORE OR 4 .. GULF ,_ F.. s::_a. 5,=d,v. : aA, . :..a.. Axe, a'•x:,:-' H W c 1 c 0 I 2 W QJ I d V O 4`4 at to d Li2W Wmo23__. ±sis1 LL o N G = d1Li Z LL rn ZdcmW 0 Q W = 0 A LL U riN- 1S HIS I.o c m t O J 2 - i 13 Q d N R t0 LI- r 2 0 IIimi Z LL Z I O O Z • m Y g 1 if i aa 3NIl AlNf100 re N 77 TD mo Q Y Z N "—_ ___ems_ fl7 N PM an dX QTCe_ Q LI O Q. J AP II w K m--al 1) N c. Ce CnW(q w N N Ld, Z Q 1....li CD fg O O- J • a m • U rn c w " Pro o oL° y'. CD W-:Jbv4robs 0 21... 0 M/sM co q W :1- o " , : a E a OOW w mQam ' . • ::,;70100 Fj iw silk OQ; O15 ONlNll 2 a eL LuMFM i N ..>. p N* CD l21 IwVIINVI "I, W Co W 2 Q y Pa ' , of t 4- pNUEL o f 0A13 8311100co m \ /,sgiiin.IT et; 1/... 7-9 m of m ,,'6 . o Et,b 2Q a ifpU' ''O: Is LLL,a Z ai1.i c 08 NOLSONIAll a CmwwtikZateooN01SOChllm m fi 0 i_J ONIl10d120d8IV w a V O OU sad' LbO ^ 12111WVIWVl 00`4O 1^"' 08( a) ,_ ,,,) c„ ,,,,i i NNV$d-31131° i I 210 ill9?JSONVA GULF SNORE OR r I. W o U W ET J ami ami o,O Q hQFddCL0. s1- g m o E E o0LLtEisis'. u Z mm LIi: !m_ 1 0ao1SHISL01"i x o a m` 5 f d w a ro o 6 iJ OW itt p; LL.` t-0 it.,-L.iO, am F Z HNtow Lu Y r-- 08 3NI1 ALNfO0 I o rill-, I 4 04. it,,,,t; s N w Et f 0.)._ O N m a tiW2i o v zn p.ctz Q cox 7/ 03,„,,,,,„.. Z I. Z. trim! i`r J bW, yd'., a Etii0 w A18 q 0 w 21311100 le w w a O O R v J' r OQ' F z ce tr iiiiit 01 NIAIl44t Ili-. 2 till'Illirgia_ AM.AgPIAIIIIIIIII . W I. N wrr.rlS 18 IWVIWV1 ujt1W CO Page=of b., g _/t McoogIggOth .c i z i o w INs. gl O m t MbTrxtp31t1WOr2 3p1 co 1D D UpleCONOimII1IhH12iH7GLLIO 1 _ III 00 , I I i z AJNfOD HD1f3e Wltld1 AlNno3 3OVO MVtwA1NnoaontlmoneI Va. 1ANnoo n3 03 AJNno5eilo AaNnoOAaNH I W i O V j 1 e Ni W E.c, 1~ o o a oa iu i a2 1:13 z aI o`er 1 Q I8Wmm1z 0n i LI o 11 11w 1 Lu O Hg LL 1 0 H IK...... a i et J a r 1 z i i 1 ) r I r••-/I t Emu L e u. i. ` Z 111 1 0 1. _ t t7 O t ,gihm. mi.v i : 4r ' db., J0 I LLI 45.4 1 i mill MN MIN EJ i•. i 6 lbwdm ~ 1 iik RN. r Lp r's gig 3 Page i o of :11 1 1 1: 4F11 !I 11 m1ILrq7711g1mozs14i1i IIa 1 41'.*•V 1 N 2 I z .- rig811i5RLaIP21I1111111 / 3 5 =Iia1ICIOl8211 t 2 u$ z 2 0 z E M 0 0 w tJ J u) CD 0 et L61 11 I Z 0 Er.:1 i . CIA18 H311103 to) 1, w I: oc.z ILI MI . .. r 0 i Cl) CO Ce o M 1"4 CC Imm 1 5 z i 2 3 I— 0< = cc Z a OKIS NYDOls 1 C) cO Co/ usco 0 Ill 0 c Lisl go Z 1 1 4 oz 1._ i ILA 10, we toAtovigool 1 0006000000. 100.00001 e 1 cc g7 OH NOISE:MINI g 0 Okl alOclIAIV l'i 1 sto U i2 cc M i.. ., ....... vl p Z01—, = 0 .- 0 1 V 71 f I 1 0 Clii NN"-A 3.LL310•4 a U 1 a 4 z 0 Ho 11181:13ONVA Z M Lt. 1 g LLI 111 16 4004 Page=s:of 19 i rr mG21I1g {i 1 W OaMooMUE'...h1WN44.1,F J D Y0Iggililli ' 51 al N rit z Z 3 LI ceW 7. 1u W ixm ce acl ga 2z o a h Y.1 m mei 0Q m ante saav-Oaana O O W QWG acc f. i W 1 0 171Jm Z J a c 1 ccZj:—OB aa1YMO!I O ORI NOs1IM Z M u. og W Min 0 W LL A o AlNt1001d311100 AlNf100 331 Page 3 1aof 71 ILs 1.1yyyqmNID6C21g O d C W MICOCOmOUy _, a e-11.-CO kQQWp=pAIto.O Q Ui W W W m yJ4.0 W W Z d J F F O0 € W = l = C1 ea S U u W =a5i300m23 ° R E W a6 2p, gi eh1iIas2J80iOWCu.1- Q u.a A Z e Z M O V GC W J J O Li COgqr aa0QZ m a= L 0arilW m 4 W OZ Z J a F* mQVCC Ne 2 CC M x u, a PQ ad 331YMOWWI ad SIV3)1 MVO li r,..d ucc W J J : Z n 0 5cQ o O i G o LL J J W g j P" LL W LL P0 Pae/5 of,22. ri M5tnOF41IlaIWLi- 01mo.toO.s.oI 11111111 ; IIHI0 1. 1 tel Z Z M O u Cg W gi. 1.111: U m i CO IX a G W a Zmco) N31l1OJ am 9311100 ` Z ilLeg ft 0 4 H iii N 0 Z 0A1O Nr©O1/0A19 1, 11: 11/9111f9 WIN'S Y 1— O 03 m HaV 3t., 0 w O IW yaj 1 1 U C o tc 09 NOlSONIA11 J iliZ cc Z 1 O m aws Oa ONlllnd laodalr O 0W LLL Id 311310000.18.1.8 in 7.--- _- g W W LL 1 • Page 24_of il y MyygCVtl9CI . O 6 OWa.41 MNiiNWaPO11F.411 isIi112gIiiooig24 in N Z Z m O U ce W J J O 0kJ I to W m QaG Z O in Y.1 m el I CE O zQ la ce N an a in0 pR a C U rcr 1 da 131N1 Q 2 LT. 66 t 4, V' anis 14311100 S U C4,0 I CC 2 2 O_ 5 G N Z v o g0W LL V 0 W P Page 7of Me IIIei, fa. 1 _a l i giimo 4 a ier tIy ri91(1 lia 1.4.) III501` d o COUNTY BARN RD .-! ..+ KI-1E;T:,1 cd m cO E _I_ — Si _.. 0i'ifo0oI 9 \\ J = L8NC v N 1 8 N Cel et Ti- l ..—i', i--A-- . j 1 _J7 L. co 0 o Qfi J 2 ,e, ,:.,... - --- -:::._ c 0illte' 01 00 i0 tdik1(/ y am• , J I r i Qa0 Via,i , -. H Go i I C z aillry 0 41 I. w e to a° I— 47 Lia lark,i .3 _, II ORT PULLING '; }n" ¢ R I 1 V IJ rr—AIRP IN i mm i x ri1C9 1' 1 Z C r1 I- - -I '': . c< q .. -:.` BAYSHORE DR I4.0 In In f,L. I , I i_11 , s... ..a. O I 1. -_ - 1 ,, r_, Ill l S i-. V r H,.. pa 7-? N 1 11 .i __ __ Th J II its 11 j..j__} Icn it ifli N. o s a 14di ta, a f 1 r Page of 1,9 . aN1W m S9ai1AOgWI1I51Zo' 1 1• Ow _15.Ji 1 I , 4 p a m W N CIA1E1 NV0O1 N I 01— I FIsl a i iul Er U W' m I m U Gel NOISONIAf o d i 021 ON111f1d 121Od211V_ _t w 0 V r lI v Lu Lu z; 0 ctlLu O, > iNV21d-311314OOJ 03 Q e.=w __ 4-1 2 IL I— Qas o>o o C u) N12i11WVIWVI a 10 a. p) c z w I— RI O N 03Z 25iLAas01- o Zia 11I92i3GNVA trn ia) 00 Q ZWMm H z O. am, U W N 0 S yG0 GUy-F OF SEX Z /\ A m N a 3 a a n ILr) g g gNg5 a ,e a m 0E Gr b U j H Wr Y 01O_ III I '1-' 1 NroIili ) tor 2 n.d 21 zz 1:1 IaZCwMNfjjjr_N m mEr1 (k 3 c CI. I I f 1 1 1 O m EaU)m ci I i' e S it CIA1E1 H2I1100 Al_it 3 _ I III. , I„ - 1 II 1 E v I- Lnll 1 II 1 ` I Illi 1 T w$i 11 I IO F j j II i VIIIIIP, J u' C a) 1 W : 11 1. m 1 ,"' 1l iub I Z e, C7 a- I , _ I I Til 1: I LNU t I..L sZt_ II II I r I. r i, W I J 2ZIi; - I 1 11 - J:4 L. - t0' r'I V VaJ— r I II I— I- 1 _ II II ''_ I', y 1114 III..J II' . II. 1_ C I LIII 1 1 aA1S VHV821Ve VINVS 'I 1,1 O 1 _ _ I III Qii/ 0 4i I 111 I I Et o. CO 1 p 1 al H co dMit _ I i r- Lu I I, ' m C 1 II1, 1 l l I1 I co as 11 , _I. t, III 0 1 I 1 III' I I 1 I ' t`— II III I I 1 Z 1aI1II_ I I I QI ca 1 I Ili II I I II o cIIILcoIL, p 11 11 i II 111' _L III 1 I- 7, 10 II I Cf_ r =I' c.) o CC G NOlSONIAII 4.0 I ' NV! o 01• i1 i ' W w 1 z, 1 I . I 02:1 JNI11f1d 12iOdiIV t I 1 u I I_ E 0 II m 411 N 1111 a ci 5t l)row j w a sg S1 a Pr E u ' ry 1p o F! ..... t d m 5 i it i g w I 1 Qb 311310000 100 ( ' Page/52_of.`Z_ EXHIBIT'A' PL20130002637-CPSP-2013-11 TR - 8 SIS Facilities Map - FDOT District 1 A N* 4 Th_ f— J--1_ 1 l` 4 314 District: 7q \<,, X_t4 r ti 5 470 Cleat watt) 5 .,-.) IOW District: 5 60lkailT SIS Seaport i _ EMERGING SIS L,_ Port Manatee 0 sls 41/1 SIS Freight Terminal 70 III 441 EMERGING SIS Sarasota/Bradenton I 13 SIS rIntemational Airport SIS Airport i- m m__. ili I-75EMERGINGSIS I ila SIS 2 1., District: 1 SIS Passenger Terminal 61 EMERGING SIS CE SIS r- 80 I$ Highway Lee(Tran%Intermodal g y Center(Fort Myers))'wa 11.... SIS Highway Corridor Southwest Florida International Airport 11rt 1. Emerging SIS Highway Corridor SIS Highway Connector 0MilitaryAccessFacility0 SIS Railway 1-75 EMERGING SIS I SIS SIS Waterway L EMERGING SIS i, SIS FDOT D1 Z District: 6 1 Other FDOT Districts 0 12.5 25 50 Miles FDOT:$iS Facilities 2014CountyBoundaryIIIIlIiiIESRI:County BoundaDr,Zap 2015 P