Loading...
EAC Agenda 02/05/1992 COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA FEBRUARY 5, 1992: 9:00 a.m. COMMISSION BOARDROOM, THIRD FLOOR--BUILDING "F" I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES--January 8, 1992 III. ADDENDA IV. ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL AGENDA V. REGULAR AGENDA A. Special Treatment Development Permit No. ST-92-1 "Louis B. & Irene F. Riney" Section 24, Township 53 South, Range 29 East Collier County, Florida B. Special Treatment Development Permit No. ST-92-2 "Barry & Theresa Fouts" Section 24, Township 53 South, Range 29 East Collier County, Florida C. Rezone Petition No. PUD-91-14 "Bear Creek" Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida B. Planned Unit Development Amendment Petition No. PUD-84-20(2) "Lely Resort" Section 21, Township 50 South, Range 26 East Collier County, Florida VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Workshop - Environmental Enforcement of Stipulations placed on petitions by Environmental Advisory Board. VII. NEW BUSINESS PAGE 1 OF 2 AA". VIII. ADJOURNMENT IX. WORKSHOP *********************************************************************** NOTES: A. [Board Members] : Notify PROJECT REVIEW SERVICES (643-8470) no later than 5 P.M. on Monday February 3, 1992, if you cannot attend this meeting or if you have conflict and thus will abstain from voting on a particular petition. B. [General Public] : Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. *********************************************************************** PAGE 2 OF 2 MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD DATE: January 8, 1992 TIME: 9: 00 A.M. PLACE: 3rd Floor Boardroom, Building "F" , Collier County Government Center, Naples, Florida EAB STAFF PRESENT Martin X Arrived 9: 12 Smith X Worsham X Prynoski X Turrell X Adarmes X Neale X Burgeson X Watts X Reischl Vidzes X Polen X Hermanson X Bateman MINUTES BY: Earlene M. Weber, Secretary II Project Review Services CALLED TO ORDER AT: 9: 08 A.M. ADJOURNED: 1:20 P.M. PRESIDING: Patrick Neale, Chairman ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA: Agenda re-arranged. Discussion by David Weigel, Assistant County Attorney of November comments by himself to EAB taken first. V. Regular Agenda - items re-arranged and VI.B. inserted in regular agenda. Items heard in the following order: A. PUD-89-29 (1) B. ST-91-13 C. PUD-87-48 (1) D. PU-91-1/59.80/59.423 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 6, 1991 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 4, 1991 Page 1 ' ! t /'" ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD JANUARY 8, 1992 ****** ITEM: Policies and Procedures COMMENTS: David Weigel, Assistant County Attorney addressed Board concerning any questions on Policies and Procedures he explained at November EAB meeting. ****** PETITION NO. PUD-89-29 (1) FILED BY/FOR: Christopher D. Hagan, P.E. of Hole, Montes and Associates, Inc. , representing Associates of Livingston Road, LTD. REQUESTING: PUD amendment to the "Livingston Road PUD" . REPRESENTED BY: Robert Duane of Hole, Montes and Associates, Inc. COMMENTS: For a complete record of the proceedings reader is directed to the tape recording of this meeting, located in the office of the Clerk to the Board, 5th Floor, Building "F" , Collier County, Government n Complex. MOTION: Made by Ms. Watts, seconded by Mr. Worsham and carried 6/1, to approve Petition PUD-89-29 (1) with modified stipulations. Mr. Hermanson abstained from voting. STIPULATIONS: Water Management: 1. That all conditions approved by the Water Management Advisory Board at the meeting of April 11, 1991 shall be adhered to. 2 . Section 11.1.F of the PUD document shall be revised to read "Ordinance 91-102, Division 3.5" instead of "Ordinance No. 88-26". Environmental: 1. There shall be no land clearing associated with retaining approximately thirty head of cattle or any other agricultural use on the site. ****** Page 2 'r /'N ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD JANUARY 8, 1992 PETITION NO. ST-91-13 FILED BY/FOR: Jerry Neal, Office of Capital Projects; representing Collier County Board of County Commissioners REQUESTING: A special treatment permit for mitigation work in connection with the construction of a boardwalk facility at the Clam Pass County Park. REPRESENTED BY: No presentation was made. COMMENTS: For a complete record of the proceedings reader is directed to the tape recording of this meeting, located in the office of the Clerk to the Board, 5th Floor, Building "F" , Collier County, Government Complex. MOTION: Made by Mr. Vidzes, seconded by Mr. Martin and carried 7/0 to approve Petition No. ST-91-13 with Staff's stipulations. STIPULATIONS: Environmental: n 1. All mitigation shall be completed in accordance with the Clam Pass Mitigation Bid No. 91-1800 and Addendum No.1 dated November 19, 1991. 2 . If it is necessary for vehicles to be on the Clam Pass Beach to perform the mitigation activities, petitioner shall apply for an Exemption Certificate for a Vehicle on the Beach, subject to the review and approval by the Project Review Services Environmental Staff, prior to any construction activity. ****** PETITION NO. PUD-87-48 (1) /SMP-91-8 FILED BY/FOR: Alan D. Reynolds, AICP; Wilson, Miller, Barton and Peek, Inc. REQUESTING: Provided report on Hollow-Stem Auger Borings for the Southampton Site as requested by Environmental Advisory Council meeting of 8/21/1991. REPRESENTED BY: Kim Kobza and D. S. Saxena, P.E. Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD JANUARY 8, 1992 COMMENTS: For a complete record of the proceedings reader is directed to the tape recording of this meeting, located in the office of the Clerk to the Board, 5th Floor, Building "F" , Collier County, Government Complex. MOTION: No Board action needed. Report accepted as provided. ****** PETITION NO. PU-91-1/59.80/59.423 FILED BY/FOR: Robert K. Lockhart of Lockhart Engineering, Inc. , representing Southfield Farms Ltd. , V REOUESTING: Provisional Use "3 .a & 3 .b" of A-2 zoning for earthmining and related processing and commercial excavation permit approvals. REPRESENTED BY: Jack Robson of Southfield Farms Ltd. COMMENTS: For a complete record of the proceedings reader is directed to the tape recording of this meeting, located in the office of the Clerk to the Board, 5th Floor, Building "F" , Collier County, Government Complex. MOTION: Made by Mr. Hermanson, seconded by Mr. Vidzes and carried 4/3, to approve Petitions No. PU-91-1/59.80/59.423 with Staff' s stipulations and one additional stipulation (No. 15) which applies to commercial excavation number 59.423. Voted yes: Vidzes, Watts, Hermanson and Neale. Voted no: Turrell, Worsham and Martin. Note: The stipulation of monitoring required by EAB was already reflected in Staff' s stipulations of both excavations. STIPULATIONS: Staff recommends approval of Commercial Excavation Petition No. 59.423 and Provisional Use Petition No. PU-91-1 "Dude Pit (Trenches)" with the following stipulations: Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD JANUARY 8, 1992 Water Management: 1. The excavation shall be limited to a bottom elevation of -10.0 ft. NGVD. All disturbed areas proposed for lake excavation shall be excavated to minimum elevation of -4.0 ft. NGVD. 2. Off-site removal of material shall be subject to "Standard Conditions" imposed by the Transportation Services Division in document dated 5/24/88 (copy attached) . 3. Where groundwater is proposed to be pumped during the excavating operation, a Dewatering Permit shall be obtained from the South Florida Water Management District, and a copy provided to Project Review Services for approval prior to the commencement of any dewatering activity on the site. 4. No blasting will be permitted unless issued a separate permit by Collier County Project Review Services. 5. If trees are to be removed as a result of the excavating operation, a vegetation removal permit, required by the Land Development Code shall be obtained from Collier County Project Review Services before work shall commence. 6. All provisions of Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, Article 3, Division 3.5 shall be adhered to. 7. Copy of South Florida Water Management District construction/operation permit or early work permit shall be provided prior to excavation permit approval. 8. This approval is subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners of Provisional Use Petition No. PU-91-1. 9. No Excavation Permit shall be issued until all impact fees have been paid. 10. All stipulations and conditions of Provisional Use Petition PU-91-1 shall be adhered to. Page 5 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD JANUARY 8, 1992 r"'t 4. Off-site removal of material shall be subject to "Standard Conditions" imposed by the Transportation Services Division in document dated 5/24/88 (copy attached) . 5. No blasting will be permitted unless issued a separate permit by Collier County Project Review Services. 6. If trees are to be removed as a result of the excavating operation, a vegetation removal permit, required by the Land Development Code shall be obtained from Collier County Project Review Services before work shall commence. 7. All provisions of Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, Article 3, Division 3.5 shall be adhered to. 8. Copy of South Florida Water Management District construction/operation permit or early work permit shall be provided prior to excavation permit approval. 9. This approval is subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners of Provisional Use Petition No. PU-91-1. 10. No Excavation Permit shall be issued until all impact fees have been paid. 11. All stipulations and conditions of Provisional Use Petition PU-91-1 shall be adhered to. 12. No dewatering will be allowed for the lake excavation. 13. No off-site removal of material shall be allowed until right turn lanes are built on U. S. 41 right-of-way. 14. Haul route shall be limited to U.S. 41. 15. Property shall be fenced around its entire perimeter. 16. Prior to excavation permit approval, a water quality monitoring program including, but not limited to dissolved chloride, conductivity, pH and frequency of application shall be submitted v-� to Project Review Services for review and approval. Page 7 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD JANUARY 8, 1992 11. No off-site removal of material shall be allowed until right turn lanes are built on U. S. 41 right-of-way. 12. Haul route shall be limited to U.S. 41. 13. Property shall be fenced around its entire perimeter. 14. Prior to excavation permit approval, a water quality monitoring program including, but not limited to dissolved chloride, conductivity, pH and frequency of application shall be submitted to Project Review Services for review and approval. 15. Pumping shall cease at a drawdown level of 2.0 feet and a monitoring program to assure that these levels are maintained shall be submitted to Project Review Services for review and approval prior to issuance of the excavation permit. Staff recommends approval of Commercial Excavation Petition No. 59.80 and Provisional Use Petition PU-91-1 "Bass Pit (Lake)" with the following stipulations: 1. The excavation shall be limited to a bottom elevation of -10.0 ft. NGVD. All disturbed areas proposed for lake excavation shall be excavated to minimum elevation of -4.0 ft. NGVD. 2. A depth greater than 15 feet up to a depth of 20 feet (-10.0 ft. NGVD to -15.0 ft. NGVD) may be permitted upon submission of actual soil borings, in the manner set forth in Article 3, Division 3.5. 6.1.3i of Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102 (Collier County Land Development Code) , plus a soil analysis of the borings for determination of the presence of the Bonita Springs marl. Determination is made in agreement with Collier County Staff and the applicant' s professional representative. 3. A depth greater than 20 feet (below -15.0 ft. NGVD) shall require a re-submission to the Environmental Advisory Board and the Board of / County Commissioners. Page 6 i I ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD JANUARY 8, 1992 17. Off-site flows historically passing through project site shall continue to be conveyed or stored on the project site. Revised plans and calculations shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of excavation permit. Environmental: Staff recommends approval of Provisional Use Petition No. PU-91-1, subject to the following stipulations: 1. An approved wading bird management area shall be established in accordance with Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) recommendations in the north one quarter to one half of the proposed borrow pit area unless otherwise agreed upon by FGFWFC and a letter releasing the petitioner of these requirements is submitted to Collier County Project Review Services Environmental Staff prior to issuance of excavation permits. 2. A wading bird habitat management plan shall be developed, approved by Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, and implemented prior to issuance of excavation permits. Seasonal wading bird use shall be monitored by a qualified environmental consultant to establish success of management area. 3. Turbidity barriers shall be used between the excavation and wildlife management areas. No water shall be discharged into the management area unless specifically included in management plan by Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. The barriers shall be clearly indicated on the excavation plans. 4. If the management area is determined to be unsuccessful by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) , the applicant shall provide, prior to release of excavation bond, in-kind off-site mitigation (i.e. kind purchase) on a 2: 1 basis, or as approved by FGFWFC. Page 8 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD JANUARY 8, 1992 5. Excavations and rock processing shall not occur within 750 feet of the wading bird management area during woodstork nesting season. Blasting operations shall be restricted to the non-nesting season. 6. The Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission shall be extended the opportunity to review and comment on the final configurations of the excavations, prior to issuance of excavation permits, to ensure that wildlife habitat has been adequately protected, by appropriately designed shelves and slopes. 7. Prior to issuance of excavation permits, the petitioner shall provide an adjacent well survey within the influence of dewatering drawdown. The survey shall include location of wells, uses, depths, withdrawals and predicted effects the project will have on the surrounding wells. Petitioner shall address the potential for saltwater intrusion prior to issuance of permits for the commercial excavation. 8. Prior to issuance of excavation permits an approved groundwater monitoring plan shall be submitted with specified parameters, monitoring schedule, proposed allowable variations and contingency plan if variables exceed their allowable limits. These plans shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County Environmental Services hydrologists. 9. The excavations shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in depth unless it can be demonstrated from a comparative water quality study that depths in excess of twenty (20) feet will not, have a detrimental effect on the groundwater resources in the surrounding area. This determination must be addressed prior to issuance of commercial excavation permits for the site. 10. Prior to issuance of excavation permits, the applicant must perform evening wildlife surveys for the presence of wading bird roosting areas within boundaries of project and solicit management recommendations from the Florida /"\ Page 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD JANUARY 8, 1992 Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) . The limits of excavation may be revised to comply with the FGFWFC management recommendations. NOTE: Stipulations 1-9 were approved by EAC in the meeting of April 17, 1991. In the event that the Board of County Commissioners denies Commercial Excavation Petition No. 59.80 and 59.423, and Provisional Use Petition PU-91-1 "Bass Pit (Lake)"and "Dude Pit (Trenches) ", the following stipulation is recommended by Staff: 1. The owner shall be responsible for clearing and restoring the property of all debris, equipment, stockpiling, etc. from the original excavation permit. Contact with Collier County Project Review Services shall be made in order to obtain the proper permits. ****** ITEM: Discussion of policies and procedures. Specifically, legal interpretation concerning Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) waivers and how they effect petitions heard by the EAB. COMMENTS: EAB was given written legal interpretation from David Weigel. Petitions receiving an EIS waiver would not be required to be heard by EAB. (See attached. ) ****** ITEM: Consent Agenda/Administrative Agenda COMMENTS: Board agreed to an Administrative Agenda for petitions which have received an EIS waiver but have water management concerns relating to lake excavations. The Board directed Staff to place items which receive a waiver to the preparation of an EIS, but have environmental concerns which Staff feels Board should to be aware of on the Administrative Agenda. Administrative Agenda items require a letter of agreement from the applicant to Staff's stipulations. /°\ ****** Page 10 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD JANUARY 8, 1992 ITEM: Workshop - Environmental Enforcement of Stipulations placed on petitions by Environmental Advisory Board. COMMENTS: Workshop will be re-scheduled for February Agenda and placed under Old Business. ****** ITEM: Workshop - Review of drainage feasibility report for Riviera Golf Estates Unit Four. PRESENTED BY: John Boldt P.E. , Water Management Department. COMMENTS: Interval maintenance implemented as soon as possible. Clean out ditch of vegetation and blockages. MOTION: Made by Mr. Vidzes, and seconded by Mr. Turrell and carried 7/0, that the engineering report be accepted and submitted to Board of County Commissioners. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair. Environmental Advisory Board Patrick Neale, Chairman Page 11 REãT70 DEC3 ° ►9y► MEMORANDUM " 4JECT REVIEW SERVICES DATE: December 27, 19 91 �•__._,.` TO: Barbara N. Prynoski, Chief Environmental Specialist, Development Services Department, Community Development Services Division FROM: David C. Weigel, Assistant County Attorney10* 0\ RE: RLS Item #DPR11089101, regarding the EAB Ordinance, No. 91-68/EIS Issues You have indicated that the Environmental Advisory Board has requested a legal interpretation concerning its duties pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. , 91-68, the EAB Ordinance, and particularly, section 6 thereof, which provides that, "The Environmental Advisory Board shall review all land development petitions which require an Environmental Impact Statement. . ." Specifically, the question is: "Are petitions which meet the criteria for an EIS exemption per Collier County Land Development Code Division 3 .8 required to be heard by the EAB?" In response to the foregoing issue and questions, it is my opinion that the language of Ordinance No. 91-68 should be afforded the normal meaning of the words, taken in conjunction with the requirements of the Collier County Land Development • Code, Division 3 .8, as applicable. Section 3.8.3 of the Code provides specific requirements when an environmental impact statement shall be required prior to any type of building permit, conditional use, zoning change, planting, development, site alteration, etc. , shall occur to real property. Section 3.8.9 of the Code also provides for exemptions from the requirement of providing an EIS, such exemptions being applicable to and modifying the otherwise absolute requirement of an EIS pursuant to Section 3 .8.3 of the Code, which includes the acreage threshold and other criteria. Therefore, any land development petitions which do not require an environmental impact statement pursuant to the Collier County Land Development Code, Section 3 .8.9 as applied to Section 3.8.3, shall not be reviewed by the Environmental Advisory Board pursuant to Ordinance No. 91-68, absent other criteria which would bring such petitions before the EAB. 1 ' Section Two of Ordinance No. 91-68 does provide for the EAB to function as an environmental impact statement (EIS) appeal board pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 77-66, which has been superseded by the Land Development Code, Division 3.8. In this manner, the EAB shall still be involved with those land development petitions/matters for which an appeal is triggered pursuant to the provisions of The Collier County Land Development Code, Division 3 . 8 . I hope the forgoing information and opinion is of assistance to you. If you should have any further questions in this regard, please feel free to contact me. cc: Kenneth B. Cuyler, County Attorney John Madajewski Stephanie Smith dcw/js/3850 • • i P FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT LAST N ME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE ME Grh'J44q Spm CQ/j,e. L,!/ .THE BOARD. COUNCtL,COMMISSION;AUTNORIIY, OR COMMITTEE ON ;;"/! WHICH I SERVE ISA UNIT OF: ,.....,k4AILING ADDRE ,� /• ,�( P D• /�y ! /5-et 7�J `°1 (/ • S. 0 CITY COUNTY OOTHER LOCAL AGENCY 0 STATE - -__ CITY OUNTY Aar les �/•UNGe. NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY DATE ON WH CH VOTE OCCU RED 6 0//,k iv" ,e,„ NAME OFBOARD,COUNCIL,COMMISSION,AUTHORITY,OR COMMITTEE -- kh 1 WHO MUST FILE FORM 4 This form is for use by any person serving ori either an appointed or elected board,council, commission, authority, or committee, whether state or local,and it applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of interest. . As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the-local level differ from the requirements for state officers,this form is divided into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards(municipal,county,special tax districts,etc.),while PART B is prescribed for all other boards,i.e.,those at the state level. -- __ PART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form•t;lust be filed. - J'''\ - . PART A VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS r [Required by Section 112.3143(3), Florida Statutes(Supp. 1984).] The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal(other than a government agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes)by whom he is retained. In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict: (a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is abstaining from voting;and (b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below. NOTE:Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357, Florida Statutes(Supp. 1984),or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre,one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting. In such cases, however,the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made. I,the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on v At"iu r , 19 f2 : (a) I abstained from voting on a matter which(check one): inured to my special private gain;or inured to the special gain of ! /�se�4 -�✓v'�n1SJ j /4'Q4 Z1-", by whom I am retained. CE FORM 4-REV.I0-84 _ PAGE F (b) The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: • �I I Ine.4 • ifrne.. /age? £ // Date Filed Signature Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART B VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes(Supp. 1984).] ,. - Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However,any state officer who votes in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom he is retained is required to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B_below within 15_days after the vote occurs. - I, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on 19 - , (a) I voted on a matter which(check one): inured to my special private gain;or - , inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retair^ (b)The measure on which I voted and the.nature of my interest In the measure is as follows: Date Filed Signature Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART C FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within fifteen(15)days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting,who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes.This form need not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting•conflict. • NOTICE:UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES4112.3j7(198)).A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF:THE' FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR'SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT. DEMOTION.REDUCTION IN SALARY.REPRIMAND.OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED$3.000. • • CE FORM 4-REV.10-84 n ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD STAFF REPORT MEETING OF FEBRUARY 5 , 1992 I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT: Petition No. : ST-92-1 Petition Name: Porch and Dock Construction Applicant/Developer: Louis B. & Irene F. Riney Engineering Consultant: N/A Environmental Consultant: N/A II. LOCATION: Section 24, Township 53 South, Range 29 East; Lot 40 of Plantation Island Mobile Homesites (unrecorded) , Collier County, Florida. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Petitioner proposes the construction of a 12 ' x 16 ' porch and 4 ' x 12 ' dock with an approximately 3 ' wide gangway through an opening in the mangrove fringe. Plan of Record: Environmental: Site plan drawn by Louis B. Riney and dated 12/30/91. IV. STAFF COMMENTS: Environmental: The lot is within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. A mobile home and septic system are currently on site. The porch is proposed to be built over what is now a mowed portion of the lot. The dock is proposed to be built through an opening in the mangrove (Laguncularia racemosa & Rhizophora mangle) fringe. The opening is approximately 2.5 to 3 feet in width. V. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of special treatment petition ST-92-1 with the following stipulations: Environmental: 1. Building permit shall be issued only if the Collier County Land Development Code is amended to allow a minimum of 2500 square feet site alteration. EAB Meeting 2/5/1992 ST-92-1 Page 2 2 . No mangrove trees shall be destroyed or otherwise altered (Collier County Land Development Code Section 2 .2 .24.3 .2 .d) . 3 . All exotic vegetation as defined by County Code shall be removed from the lot and the site shall be maintained exotics free in perpetuity (Collier County Land Development Code Section 2 .2 .24 .7 . 4 . 18) . 4 . Permits or letters of no objection from the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, and Florida Department of Natural Resources shall be presented prior to issuance of a building permit. PREPARED BY: ' , • Fred Reis '. Date Environmental Specialist II REVIEWED BY: Barbara N. Pry ►oski Date Chief Environmental Specialist ' I J �� a. J n F. adajewsk' P.E. Da e oject Review Se , ices Manager ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD STAFF REPORT MEETING OF FEBRUARY 5. 1992 I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT: Petition No. : ST-92-2 Petition Name: "Fouts Mobile Home" Applicant/Developer: Barry & Theresa Fouts Engineering Consultant: N/A Environmental Consultant: N/A II. LOCATION: Section 24, Township 53 South, Range 29 East; Lot 7 Plantation Island Mobile Homesites (unrecorded) , Collier County, Florida. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Subject site is a 60 'x100' (±) parcel zoned MH-ACSC/ST located within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. Petitioner proposes the placement of 90 cubic yards (±) of fill for a 350 square foot driveway and 625 square foot septic system; construction of a 25 'x45 ' elevated (8 ' ) platform; placement of a mobile home on the constructed platform; construction of a 4 'x40' (±) access walkway; and construction of a 6'x12 ' dock in an unnamed canal which drains into Halfway Creek and then into Chockoloskee Bay. Plan of Record: Environmental: Site plan, drawn by Barry Fouts, revision dated 6/12/91. IV. STAFF COMMENTS: Environmental: The lot appears to have been created by placement of spoil from canal dredging. It is vegetated by invasive exotic species; Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) and Australian pepper (Casuarina spp. ) and native species; white mangroves (Laguncularia racemosa) and red mangroves (Rhizophora mangle) along the canal. The site plan indicates placement of the structures along the eastern side of the property. In this area, the vegetation is primarily exotics, and there are several mounds of fill/rock. Several mangroves exist within the footprint of the proposed n structures. The easterly adjacent lot has an existing mobile home, the westerly adjacent lot has no alterations. EAB Meeting 2/5/1992 ST-92-2 Page 2 The petitioner has been issued the following applicable permits: Florida Department of Natural Resources - Bureau of Submerged Lands & Preserves: Authorization to Proceed U. S. Army Corps of Engineers: Nationwide Permit Florida Department of Environmental Regulation: Permit #111956895 The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation permit contains specific conditions, including compliance with State Water Quality Standards, placement of turbidity screening, and the restoration of 2500 square feet of melaleuca infested wetlands within the Big Cypress National Preserve, with monitoring of the restoration for three consecutive years. The proposed alterations are located on a portion of the lot which would have minimal environmental impact. CCLDC Section 2.2.24.3.2 states that site alteration within an area of critical state concern shall be limited to ten percent (10%) of the total site size and that no mangrove trees shall be destroyed or otherwise altered. An amendment to Section 2.2.24.3 .2 is being proposed which would allow alteration of up to 2500 square feet of a site. The proposed mangrove alteration is relatively small and the proposed mitigation is in an area approved by the superintendent of the Big Cypress National Preserve. The project cannot qualify for a variance from the CCLDC, because no variance procedure is described for alteration of mangroves. Since final authority for approval of a Special Treatment Development Permit lies with the Board of County Commissioners, the petitioner has decided to proceed with the application through the public hearing process. V. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends denial of special treatment petition ST-92-2, since no variance criteria are described for alteration of mangroves. Should the EAB recommend approval of special treatment petition ST-92-2 to the Board of County Commissioners, Staff recommends the following stipulations: Environmental: n 1. Building permit shall be issued only if the Collier County Land Development Code Section 2.2.24 is amended to allow a minimum of 2500 square feet site alteration. EAB Meeting 2/5/1992 ST-92-2 Page 3 2 . All exotic vegetation as defined by County Code shall be removed from the lot and the site shall be maintained exotics free in perpetuity (Collier County Land Development Code Section 2 . 2 . 24 . 7. 4 . 18) . 3 . Permits or letters of no objection from the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, and Florida Department of Natural Resources shall be presented prior to issuance of a building permit. 4 . The mitigation program described by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation permit # 111956895 shall be subject to inspection and enforcement procedures by Collier County Compliance Services. 5. A copy of the Surface Use Agreement between the petitioner and the National Park Service shall be forwarded to Collier County Compliance Services. 6. The building permit shall be valid only if the Florida Department of Community Affairs does not appeal the issuance of the permit. PREPARED BY: —/ I 14A) & /4 5',9- Fred Rei-chl Date Envi e - ental Specialist II REVIEWED BY: Barbara N. Prync ski Date Chief Environmental Specialist bz_. J hn F. adajews i, P.E. Date roject Review S rvices Manager { ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD STAFF REPORT MEETING OF FEBRUARY 5. 1992 I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT: Petition No. : PUD-91-14 Petition Name: "Bear Creek" Applicant/Developer: Bear Creek of Naples, Ltd. Engineering Consultant: Rory P. Causseaux, P.E. Environmental Consultant: Lewis Brown Jr. , Architect 1 II. LOCATION: Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East; bounded on the north by agricultural land, on the south by Keystone Place PUD, on the east by Airport-Pulling Road and on the west by a single family residential area. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The petitioner proposes to develop a 8. 573 acre property as a planned unit development for residential and recreational facilities. The project is to be developed as an affordable housing facility, to be used as rental units. The project will consist of 120 dwelling units on 1.39 acres, paved area on 2.01 acres, 1.5 acres of retention area and 3.67 acres of open space. Plan of Record: Water Management: "Bear Creek Apartments PUD, Conceptual Stormwater Management Plan" prepared by Lewis Brown Jr. , Architect, dated January 15, 1992, one revision. Environmental: "Bear Creek Apartments PUD", tree survey, prepared by Lewis Brown Jr. , Architect, dated December 30, 1991, no revisions. EAB Meeting 2/5/1992 PUD-91-14 Page 2 IV. STAFF COMMENTS: Water Management: The proposed water management system consists of inlets and pipes which will collect and convey the run-off from the site into an on-site retention/detention pond. A control structure will be placed on the northeast corner of the site and will discharge into an existing inlet and piping system located within Airport-Pulling Road. The existing system is part of the Airport-Pulling Road drainage system which discharges into the Airport Canal system. The discharge is being controlled at 0. 06 cfs/acre or 0.51 cfs. The stormwater system design meets the water quantity and quality requirements of South Florida Water Management District. Environmental: The 8.5 acre parcel is a vacant field with scattered and very limited vegetation, most of which is either Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) or Australian pine (Casuarina spp. ) . There are no environmental concerns on site. V. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-91-14 "Bear Creek" with the following stipulations: WATER MANAGEMENT: 1. A Big Cypress Basin right-of-way permit allowing discharge into the Airport Canal shall be provided prior to final construction plan approval. 2 . Any work to be done on the existing ditch and berm located on the west side of the property shall be reviewed and approved by Project Review Services Staff. Proper documentation showing that this work will not affect the historical flow of the area shall be provided prior to final construction plan approval. 3 . Section 4 . 8 of the PUD document shall be replaced with stipulations 1 and 2 of this report. • EAB Meeting 2/5/1992 PUD-91-14 Page 3 Environmental: No stipulations. PREPARED BY: ,11 -. '4 Jax y-Adarmes D to Senior Engineer 134A6ZVU Jd y'icr.cy‘. i/i (p/Q.Z. Barbara S. Burgeson Dat Environmental Specialist II REVI t BY: �.i , ► 1 -2 /9Z Stephan ' e R. Smith, P. E. Date Technical Services Supervisor •* ---)4,1-1-44--1- Barbara N. P yiioski Date Chief Environmental Specialist A J4 ' ' it A-41 Jo.' F. Madajewski, 4 .E. Da e P•• ject Review Serv' es Manager ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD STAFF REPORT MEETING OF FEBRUARY 5, 1992 I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT: Petition No. : PUD-84-20 (2) Petition Name: "Lely Resort" Applicant/Developer: Lely Development Corporation Engineering Consultant: Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. Environmental Consultant: Craig Schmittler, Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. II. LOCATION: Section 21, Township 50 South, Range 26 East; bounded on the north by C.R. 864 (Rattlesnake Hammock Road) , on the west by Lely Estates, on the east by C.R. 951 (Isle of Capri Road) and on the south by U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail East) . III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The petitioner is proposing to amend the Planned Unit Development n (PUD) document and master plan by relocating and changing the acreage of various land uses within Lely Resort Community. These revisions primarily pertain to the master plan with minor changes to the PUD document. The overall open space in the project has increased as a direct result of jurisdictional wetland requirements of the Army Corps of Engineers and South Florida Water Management District, topographic calculations, vegetation identifications, water management criteria, market analysis and projections. Plan of Record: Water Management: "Lely a Resort Community, Water Management Plan - Exhibit G", prepared by Wilson, Miller, Barton & peek, Inc. , dated July 1991, no revisions. Environmental: 1) "Lely a Resort Community" Aerials, Exhibit "F" , dated 1/92. 2) "Lely a Resort Community" Wetland Utilization & Enhancement Map, Exhibit "L", Revision dated 1/10/92 . 3) "Lely a Resort Community" Jurisdictional Wetlands Map, Exhibit "K" , Revision dated 1/10/92 . 4) "Lely a Resort Community" Vegetation Map for SW, NW, & NE quadrants, dated 12/91. 5) "Lely a Resort Community" Aerial with transects - File No. 5C-63A. 6) "Lely a Resort Community" Master Land Use Plan, Exhibit "H", dated 7/91. EAB Meeting 2/5/1992 /"1 PUD-84-20(2) Page 2 7) "Lely a Resort Community" Soils Map, Exhibit "E", dated 4/84. 8) "Lely a Resort Community" topographic Map, Exhibit "C", dated 4/84. 9) "Lely a Resort Community" Native Habitat Impact Map, Exhibit"M", dated 10/91. 10) "Lely a Resort Community" Environmental Impact Statement, dated 1/92 . 11) "Lely a Resort Community" Native Vegetation Calculation, Exhibit "N" . IV. STAFF COMMENTS: Water Management: The water management system for the entire PUD area has received a conceptual surface water permit from South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) . This permit approved the proposed control elevations and different locations of the discharge structures. The southeast quadrant of the project area has received a construction permit from SFWMD and all the stormwater systems for that area are in place. The north, east and northwest quadrants have received a construction permit from SFWMD, however the water management district system has not been completely built. Some of the lakes still need excavation permits. A temporary ditch has been built along Lely Cultural Parkway to accommodate the water quality requirements from Lely Elementary School. When all the stormwater system on the northeast quadrant is completed, the ditch can be closed. The southwest quadrant area has not yet received any construction permits from SFWMD. The water management system consists of a series of interconnected lakes which collect water runoff via swales and pipes. The entire area consists of 2, 892 . 5 acres. The seasonal water table, due to the size of the area differs throughout the project. As a result, different control structures have been proposed throughout the site. The drainage flow follows a north - south direction, and it ends at the control structure located on the south property line. The outfall is into the Collier County-4 Canal which runs through the Eagle Creek subdivision and ends finally in Henderson Creek. The water management system meets all the requirements for water quality and water quantity in accordance with SFWMD rules. Environmental: Significant changes have occurred since the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) submittal was received in 1984. Recent n changes to the boundaries of jurisdictional wetland lines, the addition of Collier County wetland jurisdictional lines and updates on wildlife surveys presented the need to address or update sections of the environmental impact statement (EIS) . EAB Meeting 2/5/1992 PUD-84-20(2) Page 3 Staff has reviewed the proposed changes, the EIS and all supplemental material submitted by the petitioner. The changes to the preserves and conservation/open space acreage were a direct result of new Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) jurisdictional lines Collier County jurisdictional wetland lines are being established and mapped at this time. Staff's major concerns on-site are the protected wildlife issue and retention of native vegetation or habitat throughout Lely, A Resort Community. Both are currently under review and discussions with the petitioner are on going regarding the requirement of retention of twenty-five percent (25%) native vegetation and the necessity to provide foraging habitat and cavity tree protection for red-cockaded woodpecker until such time as a revised management plan is approved by Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) or no longer a FGFWFC requirement. V. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-84-20 (2) "Lely Resort" with the following stipulations: Water Management: 1. Section 14 . 02D5) a. and 5) c. of the PUD document shall be deleted. 2 . Section 14 . 02D5)b. of the PUD document shall be revised to read "Collier County Land Development Code Division 3.5" instead of "Ordinance No. 80-26 or Ordinance No. 83-3 . " Environmental: Added language is underlined. 1. Amend PUD document (page 2-3) 2 .9 to read "Preservation of Natural Vegetation and Tree Removal" 2 . Amend PUD document (page 11-1) under Conservation/Open Space: a) 11. 02 (1) "Passive parks. " b) 11. 02 (5) subject to further review by Collier County Project Review Services Environmental Staff to ensure that water management facilities do not degrade or alter the vegetation or hydroperiod on the conservation/open space areas. c) 11. 02 (6) "Recreational shelters and restrooms upon review and approval of Collier County Project Review Services. " d) 11. 02 (7) Delete EAB Meeting 2/5/1992 PUD-84-20 (2) Page 4 3 . Amend PUD document (page 11-2) under Conservation/Open Space a) 11. 03 (1) "Overall site design shall be harmonious with the areas natural ecological characteristics in terms of landscaping, enclosure of structures, and location of buffer areas as determined by the Collier County • Development Services Director. " b) 11. 03 (2) Delete 4 . Amend PUD document (Page 12-1) under Cypress Preserve a) 12 . 2 (4) "Water management facilities and essential services, subject to further review by Collier County Project Review Services Environmental Staff to ensure that water management facilities do not degrade or alter the vegetation or hydroperiod on the cypress preserve areas. " 5. Amend PUD document (Pages 14-7 and 14-8) a) G. Environmental: b) G. (1) Delete and replace with "The petitioner shall be subject to all environmental reviews and sections of the Collier County Land Development Code, Collier County Growth Management Element and their amendments, at time of Review" . c) G. (2) Delete and replace with "Prior to any preliminary approval the petitioner shall submit an approved plan (map) clearly showing twenty-five (25) percent native vegetation to be retained on Lely A Resort PUD" . d) G. (3) Delete and replace with "Prior to approval of any proposed development in Collier County jurisdictional wetlands, the petitioner shall submit a mitigation plan, for review and approval, in accordance with South Florida Water Management District Appendix 7" . e) G. (4) Delete and replace with "Red Cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) Habitat preservation required as a result of the RCW management plans shall be platted in perpetuity under conservation easement unless otherwise mitigated on a regional basis and approved by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. No jurisdictional wetlands can be included within the red cockaded woodpecker habitat preserve areas" . f) G. (5) "Hammock Areas, as defined on Exhibit F, will be preserved, with clearing permitted only in those areas specifically required to facilitate the residential clusters and limited as much as possible. " g) G. (7) "Enhancement of the existing low and high level control on Basin B-2 to the historic levels and verified by Collier County Project Review Services Environmental Staff. " „ - EAB Meeting 2/5/1992 PUD-84-20 (2) Page 5 h) Add G. (8) "Prior to any final approvals outside of Phase I and the Classics Golf Course, the petitioner shall submit protected species surveys and management plans as required and approved by Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. ” PREPARED BY: - \/„e /k 1 >42-1 7.-,Z - Jul darmes D to Senior Engineer Lila Q,1. `i3Gcnio nn, J/23/4 z-. Barbara S. Burgeson O Date Environmental Specialist II REVIEWED BY: i , , , .A1 • i 241" Stephafie R. Smith, P. E. Dat i/ Technical Services Supervisor 474-11 /P-77/ • /Q---i-it, c1 A L /.,? 3/ 9z Barbara N. Pryr bski Date Chief Environmental Specialist A J4, 1 / /- fri 'AI/1 .- Jo, n F. Madajewski; P.E. Date P ject Review Ser'. ices Manager