CCPC Minutes 03/20/2003 RMarch 20, 2003
TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER
COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Naples, Florida, March 20, 2003
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission
in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on
this date at 8:30 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F of the
Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members
present:
CHAIRMAN:
Kenneth Abemathy
Mark Strain
David Wolfley
Dwight Richardson
Lora Jean Young
Lindy Adelstein
Paul Midney
Brad Schiffer
Russell Budd
ALSO PRESENT:
Joe Schmitt, Community Dev.& Environmental Services
Ray Bellows, Planning Services Dept.
Marjorie Student, Assistant County Attorney
Patrick White, Assistant County Attorney
David Weeks, Chief Comprehensive Planning Services
Ross Gochenaur, Planning Services
Mike Bosi, Planning Services
Fred Reischl, Planning Services
Glenn Heath, Planning Services
Jean Jourdan, Planning Services
Page 1
AGENDA
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, MARCH 20, 2003 IN THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY
GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA:
NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO $ MINUTES ON ANY
ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN
ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10
MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNI~ BY THE CHAIRMAN.
PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE wRrrTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED
IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A
MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. 1N
ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE
CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A
MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL
MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A
PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAHABLE FOR
PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COLrNTY COMMISSIONERS IF
APPLICABLE.
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL
NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND
THEREFORE MAy NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL BY CLERK
ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 6, 2003
PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES
BCC REPORT- RECAPS- FEBRUARy 25, 2003
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. BD-2002-AR-3415, Miles L. Scofielck of Scofield Marine Consulting, representing Damon Warfel of
DCS, Inc., requesting a boat dock extension for a facility protruding a total of 28 feet into the waterway for
property located at 5348 Barefoot Bay Court, further described as Lot 2, Block A., Barefoot Bay, Section 6,
Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Ross Gochenaur)
B. BD-2002-AR-3203, Miles Scofield, of Scofield Marine Consulting, representing DCS, Inc., requesting a 8-
foot boat dock extension to allow for a facility protruding a total of 28 feet into the waterway for property
located at'5328 Barefoot Bay Court, further described as Lot 7, Block A, ~Barefoot Bay, Section 6,
Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Ross Gochenaur)
1
Ce
BD-2002-AR-3491, Miles Scofield, of Scofield Marine Consulting, representing DCS, Inc., requesting an
extension for a boat dock facility protruding a total of 28 feet into the waterway for property located at
5332 Barefoot Bay Court, further described as Lot 6, Block A, Barefoot Bay, in Section 6, Township 48
South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator:. Ross Gochenaur)
~oA: -~2002~'Al~f33,81,~D~a.~d M. Corban, requesting an affair-the-fact variance of 8.7 feet from the required
m yara semamc or~,~ teet to 16.3 feet; and an after-the-fact variance of 2.1 feet from the required rear
yard setback of 20 feet to 17.9 feet; and an after-the-fact variance of 3.5 feet from the required side yard
setback of 7.5 feet to 4 feet for an existing house constructed over a drainage canal and waterway
easement for property located at 2832 Arbutus Street, Section 11, Township 50 South, Range 25 East,
Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Fred Reischl)
CU-2002-AR-2866, Mario Valle, representing Creative Homes of S.W. Florida, Inc., requesting
Conditional Use 7 of the "E" Estates zoning district for earthmining for lake excavation per
Section 2.2.3.3, for properties located at 4225 31st Avenue N.E. and 4235 31st Avenue N.E., in
Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 28 East. (Coordinator: Mike Bosi)
TIlE FOLLOWING GMP REPORTS WILL BE SENT UNDER SEPARATE COVER BY
SPECIAL COURIE~
2002 Cycle Gt4P Amendment Petitionr
CP-2002.1, petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use
Map Sedes to expand the NE quadrant of Activity Center #7 by 18.5_+ acres to allow 185,000 s.f. of
certain specified commercial uses, for property located % mile east of Collier Blvd. (CR-951) and on the
north side of the road leading to the Swamp Buggy grounds [opposite Rattlesnake-Hammock Rd. (CR-
864)], in Section 14, T50S, R26E. [coordinator:. Jean Jourdan]
CP-2002-3, petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to expand the
existing Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict by 3 acres, and to modify the allowed uses by adding 80,000
square feet of retail and/or office uses as allowed in the C-3 zoning district, and removing conditional
uses, for property located at the NE quadrant of the Pine Ridge Road/Livingston Road intersection, in
Section 7, T49S, R26E. [Coordinator: Glenn Heath]
CP-2002-4, petition requesting a text amendment to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan to mollify the
Rural - Settlement Area District to cladfy vested uses, densities and intensities, and to clarify an increase
in development density and intensity is allowed, for property located on the east side of Immokalee Road
(CR-846), the north side of Randall Blvd., and bisected by Oil Well Road (CR-858), and commonly
known as Orangetree PUD. [coordinator:. David Weeks]
CP-2002-5, petition requesting a text amendment to the FLUE to allow the Aff6rdable Housing Density
Bonus of up to 8 dwelling units per acre, but limited to dwelling unit ownership, to be applicable to 55
acres in the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, located on the east side* of Collier Blvd. (CR-951),
approximately .6 mile south of Rattlesnake-Hammock Rd. (CR-864), in Section 23, T50S, R26E.
[coordinator:. Jean Jourdan]
2
CPSP-2002-6, petition requesting amendments to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) text and
Future Land Use Map and Map series, primarily as a result of the recommendations of the GGAMP
Restudy Committee, to include: [coordinator: Glenn Heath]
1. Establishing the new "Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict" at the SW corner of the
Collier Boulevard (CR-.951)/Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR-862) intersection.
2. Expansion of the Neighborhood Center designation at the Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate
Boulevard intersection so as to include all four quadrants.
3. The creation of two new Neighborhood Center designations, one at the Everglades
Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard intersection (all four quadrants), and one at the Everglades
Boulevard/Immokalee Road (CR-846) intersection (southerly two quadrants).
4. Text revisions to the Conditional Uses Subdistrict.
5. Text revisions regarding commercial uses, including creation of a new goal and objective.
6. T~'xt revisions for format consistency, correction of prior errors and omissions, and the like.
CPSP-02-7, petition requesting amendments to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map
and Map Series to include: [coordinator: David Weeks]
1. Text revisions to Policy 4.6 to correlate with Land Development Code amendments pertaining
to Access Management Plan provisions.
2. Text revision to Policy 4.8 to add methodology for preparing population estimates and
projections as relates to the Capital Improvement Element.
3. Text revisions to the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict for clarity and to reflect past
application and interpretation by staff and the Board of County Commissioners.
4. Text revisions to the PUD Neighborhood Village Center, Business Park, and Research and
Technology Park Subdistricts to add cladty of intent regarding development thresholds.
5. Text revisions to the Density Rating System to explain and clarify density calculations.
6. Revisions to the Wellhead Protection Areas Map to reflect recent hydrologic modeling, changes
in wellfield use, and addition of new wells.
7. Text and Future Land Use Map revisions for format consistency, internal Plan consistency,
correction of prior errors and omissions, and the like.
CPSP-02-8, petition requesting a text amendment to the Immokalee Area Master Plan Land Use
Designation Description Section to correct the title of the Recreational/Tourist District. [coordinator:
David Weeks]
CPSP-02-9, petition requesting text amendments to the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Potable
Water Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element, most notably to modify some Level of Service
standards; requesting new Water District Boundary and Potable Water Service Area Maps, new Potable
Water Treatment and Transmission Facilities Map, and new Table of Capital Improvement Projects; and
requesting an update to the entire Support Document. [coordinator: David Weeks]
CPSP-02-10, petition requesting text amendments to the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Sanitary
Sewer Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element, most notably to modify some Level of Service
standards; requesting new Sewer District Boundary and Sewer Service Area Maps, new North and
South Sewer Service Area and Facilities Maps, and new Table of Capital Improvement Projects; and
requesting an update to the entire Support Document. [coordinator: David Weeks]
CPSP-02-11, petition requesting a text amendment to the Capital Improvement Element, Policy 1.1.2, to
modify population methodology for capital facilities planning, and to Policy 1.1.5, to adjust level of
service standards for water and sewer facilities to correlate with changes proposed to the Potable Water
and Sanitary Sewer Sub-Elements. [coordinator: David Weeks]
9. OLD BUSINESS
10.
11.
12.
13.
NI~W BUSINESS:
PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM
DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA
ADJOURN
CCPC AGENDA/SM/lo/3-20-03
March 20, 2003
0
A moment of silence was held. Pledge of Allegiance was recited with
Chairman Abernathy calling the meeting to order at 8:35 AM.
Roll call was taken - a quorum was established.
Addenda to the Agenda - Mr. Budd asked about a separate mailing he received
from Roetzel and Andress about a sub-district that does not appear on the Agenda
and wondering why.
Marjorie Student commented it will not be on the Agenda. When matters are not
advertised, they are not on the Agendas.
Mr. Strain is asking for two items to be added to the Agenda under New Business.
1) Discussion with Commissioner Coletta to hold meetings in Immokalee.
2) Format of the Agendas.
Approval of Minutes - March 6, 2003 - It was noted Mr. Budd's name was
inadvertenbtly omitted from the roll call as being present and Mr. Schiffer's name
was spelled incorrectly.
Mr. Adelstein moved to approve the minutes of March 6, 2003 with the above
corrections. Seconded Mr. Budd. Carried unanimously 9-0.
Planning Commission Absences - April 3rd meeting - Mrs. Young will not be
in attendance.
BCC Report - Recaps - February 25, 2003 - the BCC recommended approval
of the East Gateway PUD with a stipulation that no additional square footage be
built until the roadway services are improved.
Joe Schmitt wanted to make a comment concerning the last meeting when
Livingston Village was withdrawn. There was a comment made about lack of
cooperation from the applicants representing firm - Wilson/Miller. He apologizes
and stated it was no way to criticize the firm which is very reputable. It was a
matter of issues that they decided to withdraw and sever their relationship with
the applicant.
Chairmen's Report - none
Advertised Public Hearings:
BD-2002-AR-3415 - Miles Schofield, of Schofield Marine Consulting,
representing Damon Warfel of DCS, Inc., requesting a boat dock
extension for a facility protruding a total of 28 feet into the waterway
for property located at 5348 Barefoot Bay Court, Barefoot Bay,
Collier County, Florida.
Disclosures - None
Page 2
March 20, 2003
Those testifying were sworn in by Mr. Abernathy.
PETITIONER
Mr. Rocky Schofield with Scofield Marine Consulting, representing Damon Warfel,
President.
The Sub-division is called Barefoot Bay on Bonita Beach Road. Across from Lely
Barefoot Beach and consists of 9 lots. He displayed a map and explained the area to the
Commissioners. Two have already been approved for extensions. There are 3 hearings
and will all be the same size docks, boat lifts and the lots similar. He showed lots #2, 6 &
7 on the aerial map. He showed lot #2, showing they cannot park a boat in from of any of
the docks without an extension. They are proposing boat lifts protruding out 13 feet from
the front of the dock. From of the dock is approx. 15 feet from the mean high water line
and boat and boat lift out 27 feet. They are requesting a 28 foot boat dock extension.
The waterways meet the criteria of the 25% rule. He showed the waterway and the other
docks. All the requirements have been met for the widths of the waterway.
Mr. Adelstein asked why the contractor isn't making the docks the length Mr. Schofied
is asking by going that extra foot. He would feel better reducing them all to 27 feet.
Discussion followed on the boat lift referring to the map. Mr. Scofield explained the rip
rap being rock seawall or bank stabilization.
Mr. Abernathy questioned the depth of the water all being the same depths and
wondered if it was dredged. Mr. Schofield had it surveyed and the numbers are
according to that survey.
STAFF
Ross Gochenaur - Planning Services - the three resolutions he has, show the standard
stipulations. They are referring directly to the resolution in the staff report. All three of
them have similar stipulations. He felt approving the protrusions would be appropriate,
even one being marginally over the 25%. The Building Dept. allows about 6 inches
leeway with pilings; being they tend to settle. The applicant is being responsible giving
the one extra foot rather than taking it from the Building Dept. He would approve the 28
feet for all three resolutions.
The hearing is closed for motion and discussion.
Mr. Budd moved to approve petition BD-2002-AR-3415 with the total length
reduced to 27 feet with staff's stipulations. Seconded Mr. Adelstein. Carried
unanimously 9-0.
B. BD-2002-AR-3203, Miles Schofield, of Schofield Marine Consulting,
representing DCS, Inc, requesting an 8 foot dock extension to allow
Page 3
March 20, 2003
for facility protruding a total of 28 feet into the waterway for
property located at 5328 Barefoot Bay Court, Barefoot Bay, Collier
County Florida.
PETITIONER
Mr. Rocky Scholfield - representing Damon Warfel - this one represents Lot #7 which
is a tight lot and the smallest in the sub-division. They are putting the same size dock in
as the previous one and meet all criteria. They would be willing to change it to the 27
feet.
Those testifying were sworn in by Mr. Abernathy.
Disclosures - None.
Discussion followed on the size of boats that can access the area. The maximum size
would be 26 feet.
STAFF
Ross Gochenaur- Planning Services- staff has no objections and recommended
approval.
The hearing is closed for motion and discussion.
Mr. Wolfley noticed in the last request that at 28 feet they were sitting at 25.2% of the
waterway. This one is 23.3% - consequently he didn't feel the restriction of the 27 foot
rule should apply.
Mr. Wolfley moved to approve the request BD-2002-AR-3203 with stipulations by
staff. Seconded by Mrs. Young. Carried unanimously 9-0.
C. BD-2002-AR-3491 - Miles Schofield, of Scofield Marine Consulting,
representing DCS, In., requesting an extension for a boat dock facility
protruding a total of 28 feet into the waterway for property located at
5332 Barefoot Bay Court, Barefoot Bay, Collier County, Florida.
Those testifying were sworn in by Mr. Abernathy.
Disclosures - none.
PETITIONER
Page 4
March 20, 2003
Rocky Schofield - representing DCS, the applicant - lot #6 - same criteria as the last
two requests. They fit the minimum requirements of the 25% and 50% of the waterway
rule and meets all criteria.
STAFF
Ross Gochenaur - Planning Services - the petition meets all criteria and has no
objections.
The hearing is closed for discussion and motion.
Mr. Wolfley recommends approval of BD-20032-AR-3491 with the staff stipulations.
Seconded Mr. Adelstein. Carried unanimously 9-0.
De
VA-2002-AR-3381 - David M. Corban requesting an after the fact
variance of 16 V2 Feet from the required rear yard setback of 20 feet
to 3 ¼ feet from the property line for the renovation of an existing
house constructed over a drainage canal and waterway easement, for
property located at 2832 Arbutus Street. This is different then what
was in the packet.
Those testifying were sworn in by Mr. Abernathy.
Disclosures - none.
PETITIONER
David Corban - 2832 Arbutus Street and a Principal Architect - purchased home 3
years ago. Met with County Planners and found the LDC allowed for non-conforming
residential structures to be altered, renovated, expanded or re-built. Further research he
found the home had been on the tax rolls since 1968 and occupied as a single family
residence and not boat house. The way the building is constructed he feels was always
meant to be a single family home, because the formation of the sea wall and the location
of the columns tells him that the sea wall and the sight was always intended to have a
structure built over the water. Financially, it would not be beneficial to renovate the
house. He is asking to rebuild in its existing location without increasing the non-
conformity. The pilings are in bad shape, hurricane straps rusted through, ceilings are
low, no insulation, and the railings are not to current code. It would be better to build it
to current code and meet the requirements.
He hasn't decided if he will keep it a single story.
A question was asked if the home was destroyed by a hurricane. Mr. Reischl responded
if the home was destroyed more than 50% it would remain in its location. If destroyed by
Page 5
March 20, 2003
greater than 50% it could be rebuilt to the same density, but meet current dimensional
standards. (Setbacks) Variance supersedes rule.
Mr. Corban discussed conforming according to the FEMA numbers.
STAFF
Mr. Fred Reischl - Planning Services - has no effect on the Growth Management Plan
and will need to get building permits and meet building codes. Three neighbors looked at
the file and had no objections.
The hearing was closed for discussion and motion.
Mr. Schiffer moved to approve of VA-2002-AR-33871 to the Board of Zoning
Appeals with staffs recommendations. Seconded Mr. Burial. Carried unanimously
9-0.
Ee
CU-2002-AR-2866 - Mario Valle representing Creative Homes of SW
Florida Inc. requesting a Conditional Use 7 of the "E" Estates zoning
district for earthmining for lake excavation per section 2.2.3.3, for
properties located at 4225 31st Ave. NE and 4235 31st Ave. NE., on 5.0
acres.
Those testifying were sworn in by Mr. Abernathy.
Disclosures - none.
PETITIONER
Mario Valle - Creative Homes - Creative Homes provides entry level single family
homes for the workforce for Collier County primarily in the area of Golden Gate Estates
and/or Golden Gate City. They are trying to help their customers save money with the
costs of septic sand and import to different locations. They can improve a 5 acre parcel
by putting a 2 acre lake on different locations. He noted on the Executive Summary page
two, it stated "Immokalee Road" that would be traveled on - it should actually be "Oil
Well Road and Everglades Blvd." He is trying to limit the amount of traffic in
Immokalee Rd.
No fill has been taken out of site in last 6 months waiting for water table to go down.
The rip rap & rock placement around the site is for fish habitat in the lake.
Discussion followed on the trips per day being an average of 3.2 trips per day. The hours
of operation noted in a letter from Mr. Valle was referred to. The staff's hours were
slightly different and reduced. Mr. Valle agrees with the staff's hours but would like to
work on the trips per day to be efficient.
Page 6
March 20, 2003
This is for 2 lots - 2 single family sites and will stay 2 parcels. (2.4 acres -1974)
The Golden Gate Association has given approval and some members have viewed the
site. Mr. Valle sits on the Golden Gate Assn. Board.
STAFF
Mike Bosi - Planning Services - clarified the Estates Districts 2 ¼ acres are the
minimum lot sizes. Not setting an abnormal precedent. The Planning Commission
approved an excavation permit for Lot #145.
He also noted he passed out revised stipulations due to minor grammatical changes. He
covered the redundancy and minor changes.
He received several calls from property owners and after describing the situation and
project there were no obligations.
There was one objection at the neighborhood information meeting stating there were
wetlands on the project. The Environmental staff did extensive research, assessed and
was resolved.
Mr. Schiffer asked about a time limit on the conditional use. There is 5 year expiration -
they have a 3 year window now. In addition to the conditional use they are working with
the engineering staff for a commercial excavation permit which is a companion item and
will be heard before the BCC.
Mr. Strain asked staff about the hours of operation. Mike Bosi stated it means any
activity on that site.
Ray Bellows said the building permit has hours of operation for controlling of noise but
the stipulation came as a result of keeping it out of the rush hours.
Mr. Strain said what he is hearing is not what is in the resolution.
Mr. Bellows said the building permit is for the hours of excavation. The conditional use
is for regulating the truck traffic in and out.
Mr. Strain would like to see it stated more clearly so the public understands.
Mr. Valle read the document as part of the stipulation was; they would not haul anything
prior to the original application time.
Mr. Abernathy summarized it that he could be loading the trucks after 3:00 PM for the
next morning - prior to 9:00 AM.
He wouldn't load any trucks prior to 8:30 AM because it wouldn't make sense
economically.
Mr. Strain read it that they wouldn't start to load or make any noise until 9:00 AM.
Mr. Bosi clarified the hours of operations would be limited to those associated with the
building permits but the truck operations for on and off site be limited to 9 AM to 3 PM.
Staff recommends approval with the conditions and the LDC criteria being met.
The hearing is closed and open for discussion and motion.
Page 7
March 20, 2003
Mr. Budd moved to recommend approval of petition CU-2002-AR-2866 to the
Board of Zoning Appeals with the modified staff stipulations "Exhibit C".
Seconded Mr. Wolfley. Carried unanimously 9-0.
Break - 9:50 AM
Reconvened- 10:15 PM
2002 CYCLE GMP AMENDMENT PETITIONS
David Weeks - Comprehensive Planning Section - noted there were revised staff
reports and as they make their presentations they will be working off the loose leaf sheets
of the latest versions of the staff reports.
Stan Litsinger introduced two new Comprehensive Planners - John David Moss and
Darrin Murphy.
Discussion took place concerning the GMP Amendments and the LDC Code
Amendments. The details of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments
were discussed and noted questions will be asked accordingly?
Mr. Weeks gave an overview & comments which were: Will be 4 privately initiated and 6 by the County.
These are Comprehensive Plan Amendments not rezoning
This is Transmittal Heating - not making recommendations on adoptions
Sent on to the Board of County Commissioners and then the FL Dept. of Community
Affairs - State & Regional Agencies - then DCA (Dept. of Community Affairs) will
issue their ORC (Objections/Recommendations & Comments) Report. They will make sure they are found in compliance
Notice of Intent - purpose for persons to sign up - person will be notified if found
incompliance or not according to State Statutes.
Revisions were sent to the Planning Commission
Was advertised - full page
6 months behind schedule - usually adopted now
BCC hearing on Amendments will be April 8th, 2003
Procedurally - petitioner first - then staff will provide overview of analysis, findings
and recommendations
Minor changes will be presented - some grammatical
Need to collect the Documents at end of meeting
Page 8
March 20, 2003
1)
CP-2002-1- Petition requesting an amendment to the Future Land Use
Element and Future Land Use Map Series to expand the NE quadrant of
Activity Center #7 by 18.5 plus or minus acres to allow 185,000 square feet of
certain specified commercial uses for property located ¼ mile east of Collier
Blvd. (CR-951) and on the north side of the road leading to the Swamp
Buggy grounds (opposite Rattlesnake-Hammock Rd.
PETITIONER
Rich Yovanovich - this petition basically is to add a Comp Plan Amendment of approx.
18.5 acres near Rattlesnake Hammock road. The staffreport is detailed to the types of
uses. The intent of the petition is to provide office opportunities for contractors, specialty
contractors, engineers and surveyors. Distinguish it from a general office park to be more
like the Horseshoe Drive Collier Commerce area. (Business-not Industrial Park)
Wants to clarify it is for indoor self-storage not industrial type self-storage. Distinguish
them from a typical office park. Warehousing is not appropriate so can be eliminated.
Not intended to be an Industrial Park.
Mr. Wolfley feels they need to get a better handle on where the County is going in
certain areas. Not sure what the solution is but would be better in making their decisions.
Mr. Strain is concerned bout the 951 Corridor rapidly changing and not the Urban fringe
sub-district any longer. He asked if anyone in the County is looking at Master Planning
the remaining parts of the corridor.
Mr. Weeks responded there is no Master Plan. They will be going through an
Evaluation Appraisal Report. When making decisions they need to consider the facts at
hand. Know there is a proposed hospital, but don't know for sure yet. County doesn't
have the only control. Need to consider the facts.
Mr. Strain would like some language that would indicate this in not an entitlement at
this point.
Mr. Yovanovich states all this is asking is the fight to come in and ask to rezone the
property.
Mr. Weeks said the Planning Commission isn't mandated to approve - there are
thresholds and can not exceed them - the square footages or the categories of uses.
Staff does object to the proposed changes. The staff needed more data and analysis to
justify why they need the uses and intensities. They did submit information and analysis
of other commercial areas, to demonstrate this category of uses related to the construction
trades, doesn't have enough amount of zoning. They could come back and ask for an
unknown square footage. It does show there is a need for the contractor related
businesses. What would be the basis for denying it?
More discussion followed concerning the square footage, data and analysis and rezoning.
It was decided the petitioner would provide more analysis to staff on traffic and market
studies, or whatever is needed to appease staff's concerns.
Page 9
March 20, 2003
STAFF
Jean Jourdan - Comprehensive Planning Services - no correspondence and no
objections.
Mr. Weeks feel they will see many other changes occurring and requested along the
corridor.
The hearing is closed for discussion and motion.
Mr. Budd moved they forward the petition to the Board of County Commissioners
with a recommendation of approval to transmit to the Dept. of Community
Affairs eliminating the specific allocation at this time, limiting the total to 185,000
square feet for indoor self-storage, and delete -"warehouse space for various
contractor building/builder construction trade occupants and association with
related offices." Also with sufficient information provided in time for staff to make
a firm recommendation prior to adoption. Seconded Mr. Wolfley.
Mr. Yovanovich stated what he is trying to do is not change the concept, but to clarify the
concept presented. The data and information will support what they are doing.
Carried unanimously 9-0.
2)
CP-2002-3 - petition requesting an amendment to the Golden Gate Area
Master Plan to expand the existing Pine Ridge Mixed Use Sub-district by 3
acres, and to modify the allowed uses by adding 80,000 square feet of retail
and/or office uses as allowed in the C-3 zoning district, and removing
conditional uses for property located at the NE quadrant of the Pine Ridge
Road/Livingston Road intersection.
PETITIONER
Robert Duane - Hole, Montes & Assoc. - the subject property they are adding to the
Pine Ridge road mixed use sub-district was shown on the map, (At the intersection of
Pine Ridge Road and Livingston Rd) increasing the acreage in the sub district from
approx. 13 acres to 16 acres. Requesting retail uses in the amount of 80,000 sq. feet to
the westerly most 20.5 acres of the sub district. Uses would be those in the C3 zoning
district. The existing uses that are permitted on the eastern 7 acres of the district or the
conditional uses and the plan currently permits is the Golden Gate Master Plan single
family uses at the intersection. He discussed the different changes taking place with the
4-6 lanes on Pine Ridge, the extension of Livingston Road extending to the north.
Changes in the Amendments to the comp plan allowing commercial uses on this
particular tract (commercial office uses) and also the adoption of the Pine
Page 10
March 20, 2003
Ridge/Livingston road commercial infill sub-district on the other side of Pine Ridge
Road. Both properties are contained in that sub-district.
They are also proposing a loop road servicing to take traffic through the subject property
from Pine Ridge Road onto Livingston Road.
Proposal was taken to the Golden Gate Master Planning Committee, in which they
recommended, with approval, and had no objections.
Mr. Strain asked about particular language and wondering if it may be too flexible.
STAFF
Glenn Heath - Planning Services - a phrase was taken out "in an acceptable manner".
Discussion followed on the landscape buffers and setbacks along with traffic concerns. It
was noted another traffic analysis will be done and exit points are subject to review by
the County Transportation Staff.
Marjorie Student, Assistant County Attorney stated they can have a consistency with
the Comprehensive Plan because the language would indicate that all the C3 uses could
be utilized and later on if they tried to restrict the applicant; they could argue that it isn't
consistent with the Comp Plan. She said "if something needs to be limited, now is the
time to do it."
After much discussion, Mr. Duane stated he would insert two sentences - "the C3 uses
are not an entitlement. Such uses shall be further evaluated at the time ofrezoning
approval to assure appropriateness in relation to surrounding property."
Mr. Heath noted the changes in the language on page 5 of the staff report.
The Landscape buffer area was discussed.
The hearing is closed for discussion and motion.
Mr. Budd moved to forward the petition CP-2002-3 to the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation of approval to transmit to the Florida Dept.
of Community Affairs with changes - which is the language regarding the
landscape buffer be changed to reflect more accurately a 75 foot setback area; (a
setback area still includes a 30 foot landscape buffer area). A limitation of uses in
the language proposed by Mr. Duane that the "C3 uses are not an entitlement, such
uses shall be further evaluated at the time of rezoning approval to assure
appropriateness in relation to surrounding property", and to clarify that the staff
language changes be incorporated.
Seconded Mr. Adelstein. Carried unanimously 9-0.
Page 1 1
March 20, 2003
3)
AR-2002-4 - petition requesting a text amendment to the Golden Gate Area
Master Plan to modify the Rural-Settlement Area District to clarify vested
uses, densities and intensities, and to clarify an increase in development
density and intensity is allowed, for property located on the east side of
Immokalee Road (CR-846), the north side of Randall Blvd. and bisected by
Oil Well Road (CR-846), and commonly known as Orangetree PUD.
PETITIONER
Wayne Arnold - the Amendment is self-explanatory. It is to clarify language that is in
the Golden Gate Master Plan. The settlement area district known as Orangetree is
mentioned in the Future Land Use Elements and also in the Golden Gate Master Plan.
He filed the amendments for clarifications and those changes that had been made with
staff. He has no objections with the changes.
STAFF
David Weeks - history of the project was covered from the early 80's with the zoning
and sub-districts settlements. The settlements resulted in certain category of uses and
thresholds - 2,100 dwelling units, 22 acres of commercial and a variety of support uses.
This petition is adding clarity of uses being allowed. This petitioner or anyone else can
ask for a change - more dwelling units and more commercial. The vesting status has to
do with the DRI thresholds under State Statues. Staff supports the petition and has not
had any correspondence.
Mark Strain has heard the plan over the past and likes it being that he is Chairman of the
Golden Gate Master Plan Committee.
The hearing is closed for discussion and hearing.
Mr. Budd moved to forward Petition AR-2002-4 to the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation to transmit to DCA. Seconded Mrs. Young.
Carried unanimously 9-0.
4)
CP-2002-5 - petition requesting text amendment to the "FLUE" to allow the
Affordable Housing Density Bonus of up to 8 dwelling units per acre, but
limited to dwelling unit ownership, to be applicable to 55 acres in the Urban
Residential Fringe Sub district, located on the east side of Collier Blvd. (CR-
951), approx..6 mile south of Rattlesnake-Hammock R. (CR-864).
PETITIONER
Page 12
March 20, 2003
Bob Mulhere - RWA - located the project on the exhibits displayed. The project is
about .6 of mile south of Rattlesnake-Hammock. He reads in the paper the hospital is
proposed north of the subject site if it is approved. The Activity Center will change the
area. The 40 acre quadrant in the coming months will develop in a commercial way and
have an impact on the area. The policy is limited to fee simple ownership. In the urban
area, the Comp Plan allows any property owner to request an affordable density housing
bonus and not limited to fee simple ownership - but conditions associated with it. The
policy is not currently permissible within the Urban Residential Fringe so this
Amendment is seeking to extend that policy to that area within the boundaries that is
designated as the Urban Residential Fringe. It is one mile east of Collier Blvd. It is a
transitional area which is now the Rural Fringe area. He is suggesting the transitional area
will change, but there is a transitional area between the Urban and Rural areas further to
the east and will be lower density.
They submitted Transportation and Environmental evaluation. Neither roadway,
Rattlesnake-Hammock and Collier Blvd, will be affected. Both segments are scheduled
for improvement in the 5 year plan and are not operating deficient at this time.
The Environmental evaluation revealed 17 acres of wetlands and 11 will be retained on
site. The net developable area will be approx. 44 acres out of 55 acres.
They are looking at a 6 unit density bonus from 8.
This makes sense, it's a good area and staff recommended approval.
Mr. Wolfley asked about the particular area. Mr. Mulhere's client has made an effort to
acquire other properties in the area. They would not be able to ask for density bonuses on
that property that is acquired that is not described in the Comprehensive Plan.
Discussion followed on signaling, crossings, interconnections and transportation issues
that will be decided at a later date.
Mr. Strain talked about the density, and after much discussion Mr. Mulhere stated the
total will be 7.5 units per acre.
Mr. Midney asked why they excluded rental - Mr. Mulhere responded his client favored
fee simple. Mr. Strain stated there is need for workforce housing for the more affordable
owner occupied. There is an overabundance of affordable housing in that part of the
County.
Joe Schmitt stated the staff and Commissioners are supportive for the owner occupied
affordable housing also. There is a market geared toward the young professional first
time home buyer and it will not be a low income housing project.
STAFF
Jean Jourdan - Comprehensive Planning - staff supports the petition and recommends
approval. There was a change in the language that added the words "or less". (Page 1)
Page 13
March 20, 2003
Mrs. Young asked the price range of the units. Mr. Mulhere said they are referring to
more of the entry level worker and will be affordable - 80% or less of the affordable
median income of Collier County. That is approx. $65,000 household income. The
median "earned" income is about half that figure.
Hearing is closed for discussion and motion.
Mr. Budd moved to forward petition CP-2002-5 with recommendation of approval
to transmit to DCA with the correction on Item 3, page 2 of the staff report, and
that the density bonus be a maximum of 6 units per acre and not 8. The buyers will
earn 80% or less as clarified in the staffs report. Seconded Mr. Wolfley.
Carried Unanimously 9-0.
12:10 Lunch Break
1:20 Reconvened
CPSP-2002-6 - petition requesting amendments to the Golden Gate Area Master
Plan (GGAMP) text and Future Land Use Map and Map series, primarily as a
result of the recommendations of the GGAMP Restudy Committee of which there
are 6 of them.
STAFF
Glenn Heath - Comprehensive Planning - Liaison to the Restudy Committee - most
of the Amendments is language that has been reviewed by the Restudy Committee and
recommended forwarding to the BCC and Planning Commission. There are a number of
staff initiated changes constituting of previous errors and omissions and clarifications and
making some sub-districts language consistent with previous amendments.
Mr. Heath covered the different changes.
Mr. Strain asked if by changing the word "Transitional to Intermediate" is opening it up
to any uses it doesn't have currently. It's not an added district.
Mr. Richardson asked why there isn't a minimum acreage requirement.
Marjorie Student explained a local government can not force a PUD on a property
owner because the PUD is consensual between the property owner and the government.
Mr. Abernathy asked if there could be a Sub-district within 2 districts. Mr. Heath states
there are 3 parts to the sub-district with none being adjacent to the other two. One is in
Golden Gate City (SW comer of Collier Blvd & Golden Gate Parkway), one on Green
Blvd. and the third one at Santa Barbara and Parkway. They are all in the same sub-
district. The one in Golden Gate City is one district and the other two are in a different
district.
Page 14
March 20, 2003
Mr. Weeks - Planning - explained it is an awkward situation in the plan as they have
an urban commercial district (within Golden Gate City) where one of the sub-districts
are, and the other two are within the Estates mixed use district. It is two completely
different districts and stuck the same sub-district under one of the districts and made
reference to the other location. They can list the sub-district twice, once under each
district to make it clearer.
Mr. Heath explains in the current Master Plan the sub-district is only listed under the
Urban district.
Mr. Heath again noted other changes. Some of the changes will go back to the Restudy
Committee.
Two new neighborhood centers are being recommended to be added in the Estates. One
is at Everglades Blvd in Golden Gate Parkway and the other at Everlgades and
Immokalee Road.
They are also recommending expansion of the existing neighborhood center at Wilson
Blvd and Golden Gate Blvd.
The Restudy made some recommendations about the types of uses they would like to see
and not see in the neighborhood centers. Discussion followed on some of the uses.
Conditional Uses Sub-district regulates all conditional uses in the Estates and where they
can be located. Many changes were made to the neighborhood center- staff put headings
to specific sections.
Other changes and revisions were covered including grammatical.
Hearing was closed for discussion and motion.
Mr. Budd moved to approve and forward petition CPSP-2002-6 with
recommendation for transmittal to DCA.
Seconded by Mrs. Young. Carried unanimously 9-0.
6) CPSP-2002-7 - petition requesting amendments to the Future Land Use Element
and Future Land Use Map and Maps Series of which there are 7 listed.
Mr. David Weeks - Chief Planner - Comprehensive Planning Section - similar to the
last amendment - no committee involved, County initiated for clarification and correction
of omissions etc.
Population and growth rates need to be noted. After the first five years they drop down to
the medium range growth rate. That is too low - present growth rate is approx. 13,000
per year in Collier County. Don't expect to see a downturn in growth. (Will be update
annually) Discussion followed on wells and mobile home developments. New mobile
Page 15
March 20, 2003
home developments are prohibited due to evacuation and public safety concems. Mr.
Midney wondered where they will put persons of lower income.
The most proposed changes were made in the office and infill commercial districts. It's a
sub-district through rezone process and interpretations have had to be made. The depth
of the abutting commercial was one change - intent was to allow a given piece of
property on one or both sides and would be able to rezone to a commercial district.
Examples were given. They clarified the language and cleaned up the changes. Intent is
to apply to a piece of property that is no longer suitable for residential development
because of what is next door for certain commercial zone and classification of roadway it
is on - would then apply for a rezone.
Mr. Weeks touched on the residential density rating system and mixed uses. Residential
and commercial together, guest houses, cabanas, servant's quarters, and mother-in-law
dwellings were discussed.
The way the density is calculated was discussed.
Marjorie Student attended the DSAC meeting in which they made some refinements to
density and advised Mr. Weeks to contact Susan Murray in making appropriate changes
due to the fact this issue is reflected in the Amendment to the Land Development Code
because it needs to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
It had been decided to have staff draft language and take it to the Planning Commission
and then to the Board of County Commissioners. It is better to follow the process then to
put it into a format now and push it through.
Mr. Weeks felt to endorse the transmittal of the language with a clear understanding that
revisions may have to be made for the LDC changes and a separate process that brings
the language back to the Planning Commissioners and BCC. Get it in front of DCA so
they see the change, and seeing a modification wouldn't be as severe as seeing totally
new language.
Hearing is closed for discussion and motion.
Mr. Budd moved to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners transmit
to Florida DCA this section along with the revised sheets and the amendments
described by Mr. Weeks for CPSP-02-7. Seconded Mr. Adelstein. Carried
unanimously 9-0.
7)
CPSP-02-8 -petition requesting a text amendment to the Immokalee Area
Master Plan Land Use Designation Description Section to correct the title of
the Recreational/Tourist District.
Page 16
March 20, 2003
STAFF
Mr. Weeks - stated that is the change and has no recommendations.
Hearing is closed for discussion and motion.
Mr. Midney moved to recommend approval of CPSP-02-8 to be forwarded to the
BCC and DCA. Seconded Mr. Adelstein. Carried unanimously 8-0.
(Mr. Budd being absent from the room)
8)
CPSP-02-9 - petition requesting text amendments to the Goals, Objectives
and Policies of the potable Water Sub-Element of the Public Facilities
Element, most notable to modify some Level of Service standards, requesting
new Water District Boundary and Potable Water Service Area Maps new
Potable Water treatment and Transmission Facility Map and new Table of
Capital Improvement Projects and requesting an update for the entire
support Document.
Mr. Strain asked if it was necessary to talk about the potable Water Sub-Element. He
had been trying to get an answer with regards to the current status of the County with
Terrorist activities. The Sub-Element clearly indicates where the water wells are and he
didn't feel that information should be public at this time.
Marjorie Student stated under Rule 9J5 they are required to show where the well fields
are show water sewer district boundaries and possibly transmission lines. It was
suggested it be tabled until they can get an answer back from the BCC.
Marjorie will discuss this with the Dept. of Community Affairs. If tabled it would hold
up the other Amendments because they are required to do only two submittals a year.
Mr. Strain responded they could go through it today and checks with the Sheriffs Dept.
and the BCC in the meantime and have Marjorie report back to the Planning
Commission.
STAFF
Mr. Weeks - maps are all consistent with the water Master Plan 2002 update. The water
district boundaries have not expanded - not showing anything different. One map
showed the various boundaries for future service that was adopted as part of the Rural
Fringe Amendments. (Including Orangetree)
The Heritage Bay (DRI) includes change to the water sewer district boundary that
encompasses a 4 square mile area. This amendment has been adopted and being
reviewed by DCA.
Page 17
March 20, 2003
Hearing is closed for discussion and motion.
Mr. Strain moved to recommend approval for Petition CPSP-02-9. Seconded Mrs.
Young. Carried unanimously 8-0.
(Mr. Abernathy being absent from the room)
9)
CPSP-02-10 - petition requesting text amends to Goals, Objectives and
Policies of the Sanitary sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element, most
notable to modify some Level of Service standards, requesting new Sewer
District Boundary and Sewer Service Area Maps, new North and South
Sewer Service Area and Facilities Maps and new Table of Capital
Improvement Projects, and requesting an update to the entire Support
Document.
STAFF
Mr. Weeks - indicated the changes are parallel to those of the previous petition that was
just acted upon. Boundaries have not changed for the existing facilities. Recommended
approval.
Hearing is closed for discussion and motion.
Mr. Budd moved to forward to the BCC with a recommendation they transmit to
the Florida DCA petition CPSP-02-10. Seconded Mr. Adelstein. Carried
unanimously 9-0.
10) CPSP-02-11 - petition requesting a text amendment to the Capital
Improvement Element, Policy 1.1.2, to modify population methodology for
capital facilities planning, and to Policy 1.1.5, to adjust level of service
standard for water and sewer facilities to correlate with changes proposed to
the Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer Sub-Elements.
STAFF
Mr. Weeks - he already covered this in the previous amendments and recommended
approval as modified.
Hearing is closed for discussion and motion.
Mr. Budd moved to forward to the BCC with a recommendation they transmit to
the FL DCA petition CPSP-02-11. Seconded Mrs. Young.
Carried unanimously 9-0.
Page 18
March 20, 2003
It was noted there were no public speakers on any of the above petitions.
e
OLD BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS
A. Holding meetings in lmmokalee - Mr. Strain
Mr. Strain had a conversation with Commissioner Coletta concerning
meetings in Immokalee as it was his understanding they are suppose to hold
meetings there. In checking Mr. Strain found he was correct.
Mr. Budd mentioned they have held meetings there when there were relevant
petitions or issues concerning the Immokalee area.
Mr. Strain stated there will be more issues in the near future. He feels they
should have a standing policy to staff that meetings should be scheduled when
there are issues concerning the area.
SPEAKER
Commissioner Coletta stated there is a renewed interest in Government
Affairs in Immokalee. They are having more meetings at this time.
Immokalee has mentioned they would like to form their own Planning
Commission which might be redundant. The population in Immokalee
exceeds the population of the City of Naples.
Mr. Abernathy mentioned it could be set up by staff and possibly do the
coastal business in the morning and then reconvenes in the afternoon in
Immokalee for Immokalee business.
Marjorie Student mentioned in the past they grouped petitions together that
were related to the Immokalee area and held a regularly scheduled meeting
there. It was done every 3 months or so.
Commissioner Coletta didn't feel they would want to hold up progress and
wait too many months.
Discussion followed on splitting the meetings, day or night meetings and
having staff work on it. Evening meetings were not favorable. They will
direct staff to set-up.
Page 19
March 20, 2003
B. Format of the Agenda
Mr. Strain suggested staff save paper and money and not copy and send the
BCC recaps to the Commissioners in their packets. Many felt they still
wished to have them in their packets.
11. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mrs. Young would like to speak with the Commissioners concerning upcoming
projects and developments.
12. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA - None
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was
adjourned by order of the Chair at 3:15 PM.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Mr. Kenneth Abernathy, Chairman
Page 20
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Community Development and Environmental Services Division
Planning Services Department · 2800 North Horseshoe Drive · Naples, Florida 34104
March 25, 2003
Tun'ell and Associates
Michael Hawkins
3584 Exchange Ave.
Suite B
Naples, Fl. 34104
REFERENCE: BD-2003-AR-3324, WILSON, CHARLES
Dear Mr. Hawkins:
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, the Collier County Planning Commission heard and
approved Petition No. BD-2003-AR-3324.
A copy of Resolution No. 03-06 is enclosed approving this use.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 403-2400.
SincpILa'ly, ~
Planner
RG/sp
Enclosure
CC: CHARLES WILSON
P.O. BOX 588,
Walloon Lake, MI 49796
Land Dept. Property Appraiser
,..AMinutes & Records (BD, PSP & PDI)
Customer Service
Addressing (Peggy Jarrell)
M. Ocheltree, Graphics
File
<223
Phone (239) 403-2400 Fax (239) 643-6968 .. '~vww. collierzov, net
CCPC RESOLUTION NO. 03- 0 (o
RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BD-2002-AR-3324 FOR AN EXTENSION
OF A BOAT DOCK ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such
business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC)
(Ordinance 91-102, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic
divisions of the County, among which are provisions for granting extensions for boat docks; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), being duly appointed, has
held a properly noticed public hearing and considered the advisability of a 19-foot extension for a boat
dock from the 20-foot length allowed by LDC § 2.6.21. to authorize a 39-foot boat dock facility in an
"RSF-4" Zone for the property hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, the CCPC has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and
arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by LDC Section 2.6.21.; and
WHEREAS, the CCPC has given all interested parties the opportunity to be heard, and
considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Collier County Planning Commission of
Collier County, Florida, that:
Petition Number BD-2002-AR-3324, filed on behalf of Charles Wilson by Turrell and
Associates, for the property hereinafter described as:
Lot 58, Port of the Islands (The Cays) Phase II, as described in Plat Book 21, Pages
1- 4, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
be, and the same is hereby approved for a 19-foot extension of a boat dock from the 20-foot length
otherwise allowed by LDC § 2.6.21., to authorize a 39-foot boat docking facility in the "RSF-4"
zoning district wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions:
3°
Before Collier County will issue a permit to construct the approved extension, corresponding
permits, or letters of exemption, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection must be provided.
Prior to final approval of this dock extension, reflectors and house numbers of no less than four
(4) inches in height must be installed at the outermost end on both sides of all docks or mooring
pilings, whichever protrudes the furthest into the waterway.
In order to protect manatees, at least one (1) "Manatee Area" sign must be posted in a
conspicuous manner as close as possible to the furthest protrusion of the dock into the
waterway.
All prohibited exotic species, as such term may now or hereinafter be established in the LDC,
must be removed fi.om the subject property prior to issuance of the required certificate of
completion and the property must be maintained free from all prohibited exotic species in
perpetuity.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Commission and filed with the County Clerk's Office.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
Done this ~7~ day of ~'~/~,, ,2003.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
KENNETH ABERNATHY , Ci~AIRMAN
ATTEST:
//Jo/eph K. Sct(,mi~
/ ~ommunity Development and Environmental
[.~Services Administrator
~aproved ~o Form and Legal Sufficiency:
Patrick G. White
Assistant County Attorney
BD~2002-AR-3324/RG/sp
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Community Development and Environmental Set,rices Division
Planning Services Department · 2800 North Horseshoe Drive · Naples, Florida 34104
March 26, 2003
SCOFIELD MARINE CONSULTING
Attn: Miles Scofield
3584-B EXCHANGE AVE
NAPLES, FL 34104
REFERENCE: BD-2002-AR-3491, BAREFOOT BAY COURT LOT 6
Dear Mr. Scofield:
On Thursday, March 20, 2003,
Petition No. BD-2002-AR-3491.
the Collier County Planning
A copy of Resolution No. 03-07 is enclosed approving this use.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 403-2400.
Sincere~
Planner
RG/Io
Enclosure
CC:
DCS, INC.
1085 Business Lane, Suite 10
Naples, Fl. 34110
Land Dept. Property Appraiser
Minutes & Records (BD, PSP & PDI) ~'
Customer Service
Addressing (Peggy Jarrell)
M. Ocheltree, Graphics
File
Commission
heard and
approved
Phone (239) 403-2400
Fax(239)643-6968
www.colliergov.net
CCPC RESOLUTION NO. 03- 07
RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BD-2002-AR-3491 FOR AN EXTENSION
OF A BOAT DOCK ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such
business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC)
(Ordinance 91-102, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic
divisions of the County, among which are provisions for granting extensions for boat docks; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), being duly appointed, has held
a properly noticed public heating and considered the advisability of a 8-foot extension for a boat dock
from the 20-foot length allowed by LDC § 2.6.21. to authorize a 28-foot boat dock facility in a "PUD"
zone for the property hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, the CCPC has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement
have been made concerning all applicable matters required by LDC Section 2.6.21 .; and
WHEREAS, the CCPC has given all interested parties the opporttmity to be heard, and
considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Collier County Planning Commission of
Collier County, Florida, that:
Petition Number BD-2002-AR-3491, filed on behalf of DCS, Inc. by Scofield Marine
Consulting, for the property hereinafter described as:
Lot 6, Block A, Barefoot Bay, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, as described in Plat
Book 35, Pages 61-62, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,
be, and the same is hereby approved for, an 8-foot extension of a boat dock from the 20-foot length
otherwise allowed by LDC § 2.6.21., to authorize a 28-foot boat docking facility in the "PUD" zoning
district wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions:
Before Collier County will issue a permit to construct the approved extension, corresponding
permits, or letters of exemption, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection must be provided.
Prior to final approval of this dock extension, reflectors and house numbers of no less than four
(4) inches in height must be installed at the outermost end on both sides of all docks or mooring
pilings, whichever protrudes the furthest into the waterway.
3. In order to protect manatees, at least one (1) "Manatee Area" sign must be posted in a
conspicuous manner as close as possible to the furthest protrusion of the dock into the waterway.
All prohibited exotic species, as such term may now or hereinafter be established in the LDC,
must be removed from the subject property prior to issuance of the required certificate of
completion and the property must be maintained free from all prohibited exotic species in
perpetuity.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Commission and filed with the County Clerk's Office.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
Done this ~~9~ ~5 day of vV~ ~ct It. ,2003.
ATTEST:
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR1DA
· AB ERNATH _'~,;~HAIRMAN
~osj/ph K. Schrr~t" ' ' - //
/ ~C~mmunity Development and Environmental
ervices Administrator
'~roveO _a~t~ Fom2/and Legal Sufficiency:
Patrick G. '~h~it~ '"
Assistant County Attorney
B D-02 -AR-3491/RG/sp
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Community Development and Environmental Services Division
Planning Services Department · 2800 North Horseshoe Drive · Naples, Florida 34104
March 26, 2003
SCOFIELD MARINE CONSULTING
MILES L. SCOFIELD
3584-B EXCHANGE AVE
NAPLES, FL 34104
REFERENCE: BD-2002-AR-3415, BAREFOOT BAY COURT LOT 2
Dear Mr. Scofield:
On Thursday, March 20, 2003, the Collier County Planning
Petition No. BD-2002-AR-3415.
A copy of Resolution No. 03-08 is enclosed approving this use.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 403-2400.
Sinc r
Ross Gochenau~
Planner
RG/lo
Enclosure
CC:
DCS, INC.
Mr. Damon Warfel, Pres.
1085 .Business Lane, Suite 10
Naples, Fl. 34110
Land Dept. Property Appraiser .~
Minutes & Records (BD, PSP & PDI)
Customer Service
Addressing (Peggy Jarrell)
M. Ocheltree, Graphics
File
Commission
heard and approved
C
C
Phone (239) 403-2400 Fax (239) 643-6968 www. colliergov, net
CCPC RESOLUTION NO. 03- 0 8
RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BD-2002-AR-3415 FOR AN EXTENSION OF
A BOAT DOCK ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred
on all counties in Florida the powertoestablish, coordinate andenforce zoning and such business regulations
as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC)
(Ordinance 91-102, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic
divisions of the County, among which are provisions for granting extensions for boat docks; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), being duly appointed, has held a
properly noticed public hearing and considered the advisability of a 7-foot extension for a boat dock from
the 20-foot length allowed by LDC § 2.6.21. of the Land Development Code to authorize a 27-foot boat
dock facility in an RSF-5 zone for the property hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, the CCPC has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement
have been made concerning all applicable matters required by LDC Section 2.6.21. of the Land
Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the CCPC has given all interested parties the opportunity to be heard, and considered
all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Collier County Planning Commission of Collier
County, Florida, that:
Petition Number BD-2002-AR-3415, filed on behalf of DCS, Inc. by Scofield Marine Consulting,
for the property hereinafter described as:
Lot 2, Block A, Barefoot Bay, Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, as
described in Plat Book 35, Pages 61-62, of the Public Records of Collier County,
Florida,
be, and the same is hereby approved for, a 7-foot extension of a boat dock from the 20-foot length
otherwise allowed by LDC § 2.6.21. of the Land Development Code, to authorize a 27-foot boat docking
facility in the RSF-5 zoning district wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions:
Before Collier County will issue a permit to construct the approved extension, corresponding
permits, or letters of exemption, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection must be provided.
Prior to final approval of this dock extension, reflectors and house numbers of no less than four (4)
inches in height must be installed at the outermost end on both sides of all docks or mooring pilings,
whichever protrudes the furthest into the waterway.
In order to protect manatees, at least one (1) "Manatee Area" sign must be posted in a
conspicuous manner as close as possible to the furthest protrusion of the dock into the
waterway.
All prohibited exotic species, as such term may now or hereinafter be established in the LDC,
must be removed from the subject property prior to issuance of the required certificate of
completion and the property must be maintained free from all prohibited exotic species in
perpetuity.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Commission and filed with the County Clerk's Office.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
Done this c~P,~'f~ day of ~/~/*~ , 2003.
ATTEST:
~[dgervices Administrator ronmental
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
KENNETH L. ABERNATHY, cHA~'tRMAN
~~, t~and Legal Sufficiency:
Patrick G. White
Assistant County Attorney
BD-2002-AR-3415/RG/sp
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Comm,mit~ Development and Environmental Services Division
Planning Services Department · 2800 North Horseshoe Drive · Naples, Florida 34104
March 27, 2003
Scofield Marine Consulting
Atto: Miles Scofield
3584-B Exchange Ave.
Naples, FI 34104
REFERENCE: BD-2002-AR-3203, DCS, Inc.
Dear Mr. Scofield:
On Thursday, March 20, 203, the Collier County Planning Commission heard and
approved Petition No. BD-2002-AR-3203.
A copy of Resolution No. 02-10 is enclosed approving this use.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 403-2400.
Sincerely,
Ross Gochenaur
Planner
RG/sp
Enclosure
CC: DCS, INC.
Attn: Damon Warfel, President
1085 Business Lane, Ste #10
Naples, FL 34110
Land Dept. Property Appraiser
~I_ inutes & Records (BD, PSP & PDI)
Customer Service
Addressing (Peggy Jarrell)
M. Ocheltree, Graphics
File
t y
Phone (239) 403-2400 Fax (239) 643-6968 www. colliergov, net
CCPC RESOLUTION NO. 02- ~o
RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BD-2002-AR-3203 FOR AN
EXTENSION OF A BOAT DOCK ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER
DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all
counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are
necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance
91-102, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the
County, among which are provisions for granting extensions for boat docks; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), being duly appointed, has held a
properly noticed public hearing and considered the advisability of an 8-foot extension for a boat dock from the
20-foot length allowed by LDC § 2.6.21. to authorize a 28-foot boat dock facility in an RSF-5 zone for the
property hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, the CCPC has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have
been made concerning all applicable matters required by LDC Section 2.6.21.; and
WHEREAS, the CCPC has given all interested parties the opportunity to be heard, and considered all
matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Collier County Planning Commission of Collier
County, Florida, that:
Petition Number BD-2002-AR-3203, filed on behalf of DCS, Inc. by Miles Scofield of Scofield Marine
Consulting, for the property hereinafter described as:
Lot 7, Block A, Barefoot Bay, as described in Plat Book 35 Page(s) 61-62 of the Public Records of
Collier County, Florida,
be, and the same is hereby approved for, an 8-foot extension of a boat dock from the 20-foot length otherwise
allowed by LDC § 2.6.21., to authorize a 28-foot boat docking facility in the RSF-5 zoning district wherein said
property is located, subject to the following conditions:
Before Collier County will issue a permit to construct the approved extension, corresponding permits, or
letters of exemption, from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection must be provided.
Prior to final approval of this dock extension, reflectors and house numbers of no less than four (4)
inches in height must be installed at the outermost end on both sides of all docks or mooring pilings,
whichever protrudes the furthest into the waterway.
In order to protect manatees, at least one (1) "Manatee Area" sign must be posted in a conspicuous
manner as close as possible to the furthest protrusion of the dock into the waterway.
All prohibited exotic species, as such term may now or hereinafter be established in the LDC, must be
removed from the subject property prior to issuance of the required certificate of completion and the
property must be maintained free from all prohibited exotic species in perpetuity.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Commission and
filed with the County Clerk's Office.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
day of ,2003.
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
~om:nt and Environmental
~ ~7~~al Sufficiency:
Patrick G.~Whit~ '
Assistant County Attorney
BD-2002-AR-3203/RG/lo