Loading...
EAC Minutes 12/07/1988 MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DATE: December 7, 1988 TIME: 9: 00 A.M. PLACE: 3rd Floor Boardroom, (rear) , Building "F" , Collier County Government Center, Naples, Florida EAC STAFF PRESENT CARDILLO X BURCH X BELOW X EDWARDS X BENEDICT X MULDOON X KURGIS X SCHEFF X SNYDER X STEVENS X MCCOY X MINUTES BY: Dalila Mendez, Deputy Clerk CALLED TO ORDER AT: 9 :00 A.M. ADJOURNED: 10: 45 A.M. PRESIDING: John P. Cardillo, Chairman ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA: Items added by Dr . Benedict re Status report on the review of the EAC appli- cants, and the new Comprehensive Plan. Page 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7 , 1988 *** ITEM: Minutes of November 2 , and November 16, 1988 MOTION: Made by Dr. Benedict to approve the minutes of November 2, 1988, as presented. Seconded by Mr. Below. Carried 5/0. MOTION: Made by Mr. Below to approve the minutes of November 16, 1988, as presented. Seconded by Dr. Benedict. Carried 5/0. *** PETITION NO. R-87-43C FILED BY/FOR: J. Gary Butler of Butler Engineering, Inc . , representing Quail Woods Estates Development Corporation. REQUESTING: A zoning change from A--2 to RMF-6 for construc- tion of multi-family residences (Quail Woods Condominiums) . COMMENTS: Mr. Edwards advised that at the meeting of November 2 , Mr . Butler had been requested to provide a revised EIS . In response to Dr. Benedict , Mr . Edwards indicated that the EIS is complete. He described the property as follows: The site is a xeric system dominated by large patches of palmetto with scattered slash pine. He noted that the understory consists of palmettos, winged sumac, and cabbage palm, and the groundcover consists of mostly graminoids with scattered prickly pear, blackroot and poison ivy. He noted that the eastern half of the xeric landscape has been heavily invaded by grape vine and Brazilian pepper . He stated that the southern half of the property consists of cabbage palms, bald cypress; the groundcover consists of ragweed, dog fennel and graminoids. He indicated that Staff recommends approval of the petition subject to Standard Stipulations 1-4, and Stipulation No. 5 . Dr. Benedict recommended Stipulation No. 6 as follows: "The wetland shall be designated as a natural area preserve, shall be incorporated into the Page 2 t-N ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7 , 1988 water management system for the development . This shall be reflected on the land use map and all the appropriate rezoning documents" . Environmental Inspector Muldoon commented that a natural survey should be conducted on wetland areas and should be indicated on site develop- ment plans as such. She stated that the area be delineated as such by staking until construction on site is completed. Dr. Benedict stated that the aforementioned has been initiated in the past . Ms. Muldoon noted that she had visited the site on February 19 , accompanied by Mr . Butler, and discovered a small possible archaelogical site, about 25 feet in diameter, on the southwest partition abutting the wetland area. Mr . Gary Butler stated that he concurs with Staff ' s recommendations. In regard to Ms. Muldoon' s suggestion to require a natural survey, Dr . Spagna indicated that such a requirement could cost developers quite a con- siderable amount of money, and noted that the purpose of the preliminary approval is to keep engineering expenses to a minimum. He suggested that this requirement can be incorporated as part of the building application permit, as it would be part of the engineering costs of obtaining the permit . MOTION: Made by Dr. Benedict to recommend approval of Petition R-87-43C, subject to standard Stipulations 1-4c and Stipulations 5 & 6. Seconded by Mr. Below. Carried 5/0. *ss STIPULATIONS: 1 . Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance 75-21 (or the tree/vegetation removal ordinance in existence at the time of permitting) , requiring the acquisition of a tree removal permit prior to any land clearing. A site clearing plan shall be submitted to the Natural Resources Management Department for their review and sub- ject to approval prior to any work on the site. Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 1988 This plan may be submitted in phases to coincide with the development schedule. The site clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final site layout incorporates retained native vegeta- tion to the maximum extent possible and how roads, buildings, lakes, parking lots, and other facilities have been oriented to accommodate this goal . 2 . Native species shall be utilized, as described below, in the site landscaping plan. A landscape plan for all landscaping on the deve- lopment shall be submitted to the County Landscape Architect and to a County Environmental Specialist for their review and shall be subject to their approval. The landscape design shall incorporate a minimum of 60% native plants, by number, including trees, shrubs, and ground cover. At least 60% of the trees, 60% of the shrubs, and 60% of the ground cover shall be native species. At the discre- tion of the County Landscape Architect or County Environmental Specialist a higher percentage of trees or shrubs can offset an equal percentage of ground cover . For example, the use of 70% native trees could allow the use of only 50% native ground cover. This plan shall depict the incorporation of native species and their mix with other species, if any. The goal of site landscaping shall be the re-creation of native vegetation and habitat characteristics lost on the site during construction or due to past activities . 3 . All exotic plants, as defined in the County Code, shall be removed during each phase of construction from development areas, open space areas, and preserve areas. Following site deve- lopment , a maintenance program shall be imple- mented to prevent reinvasion of the site by such exotic species. This plan, which will describe control techniques and inspection intervals, shall be filed with and subject to approval by the Natural Resources Management Department and the Community Development Division. 4 . If , during the course of site clearing, excava- tion, or other constructional activities, an archaeological or historical site, artifact , or Page 4 I ' ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 1988 other indicator is discovered, all development at that location shall be immediately stopped and the Natural Resources Management Department notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the Natural Resources Management Department or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action in regard to its salva- geability. The Natural Resources Management Department will respond to any such notification in a timely and efficient manner so as to pro- vide only a minimal interruption to any constructional activities. 5 . Where possible, petitioner shall incorporate the existing cypress, pine, and cabbage palm trees into the landscape plan at their present loca- tion. If feasible, the cabbage palms may be transplanted to other areas on site . Petitioner should consider xeriscape landscaping for the xeric north half . S . The wetland shall be designated as a natural area preserve, shall be incorporated into the water management system for the development . This shall be reflected on the land use map and all the appropriate rezoning documents. sss ITEM: Proposed revision of Standard Stipulation No. 2 COMMENTS: Mr. Cardillo suggested that the subject item be discussed as an Addenda item. The Council did not have any objections to this recommendation. :s: PETITION NO. R-88-23C FILED BY/FOR: Dr. Neno J. Spagna of Florida Urban Institute, Inc . , representing Mrs. Joseph S. Weinfeld for the Joseph S . Weinfeld Family Trust , and Lester and Mary Persky. REQUESTING: A zoning change from A-2 (MH) to PUD, Trafford Highland Estates. REPRESENTED BY: Dr . Neno J. Spagna Page 5 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 1988 COMMENTS: Dr . Spagna, representing the petitioner, advised that the project was originally planned under the old Comprehensive Plan, and must follow the requirements delineated in the new Comp Plan. He noted that the commercial property had to be eliminated due to this fact . He stated that originally a portion of the project was designated as single-family, which presently includes the water management system. He stated that the reasons the retention area has been revised is to make up for the commercial deleted and to use it as a buffer zone. He noted that originally two parcels were devoted to affor- dable housing, which have been incorporated. He stated that the changes made will not have any environmental impacts in the area. He stated that the petitioner concurs with the Staff report and the gopher tortoise on site will be relocated. Ms. Stevens stated that the southern half of the parcel consists of open palmetto habitat with widely scattered slash pines. She indicated that extensive burn scars on most of the pines are indicative of recent fires in the area. She stated that the southeast corner of the site has a more dense canopy of pines, with small oaks; the shrub and groundcover includes shiny blueberry, and various grass species. She noted that the northern half of the site consists of up to 10 feet in height oaks and palmettos. She indicated that there are several off-road vehicle trails noticeable on the property; the property has been extensively disturbed, and few habitats remain on site. She advised that although the petitioner has advised that there may be gopher tortoises in the northern portion half of the parcel , she did not observe any burrows during her site visit . She indicated that Staff recommends approval of the petition subject to Stipulations 1 , 3 and 4, and stipulations pertaining to the oak trees, and the gopher tortoises. Responding to Dr. Snyder, Ms. Stevens advised that the oaks on site are quite small . Referring to Stipulation No. 4, Mr. Cardillo stated that perhaps some oaks can be kept intact . Dr . Benedict noted that past recommen- n Page 6 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 1988 dations have required that oaks be kept intact and the stipulation to keep some within the plan is a valid stipulation. Mr. Cardillo suggested that perhaps a standard can be set whereby some type of preservation can be required without unduly burdening the deve- loper. Dr. Spagna responded that he did not have any idea on how to proceed with the afore- mentioned suggestion. In answer to Dr. Snyder, he advised that the water retention area will be excavated to bank it and make it look accep- table . Referring to the map, he indicated that the southern portion of the property has been significantly burned. He stated that the northern portion has some palmettos, and the oak trees will be relocated. Dr . Benedict asked what the "white area" on the map consisted of? Dr . Spagna responded that it will consist of open space to be used as a children' s play area. He stated that if oak is found in this area, the developer would maintain it . Responding to Ms. Kurgis, Dr . Spagna sated that there would not be any problems with using 50% of the oak trees on site. Dr . Benedict suggested that at the time of the site review, the developer can work with Staff to try to save as many viable oak trees as possible ; Dr . Spagna concurred and added that it was a good approach to initiate . In response to Dr . Benedict , Mr . Burch advised that the reason Stipulation No. 2 was not included was because there have been problems with its interpretation. Dr . Benedict recom- mended that Stipulation No. 2 remain as part of the recommendation. Mr. Cardillo concurred and added that if the revised stipulation is approved, then it will be made part of the recommendation. Dr. Benedict recommended the following changes to Stipulation No. 5 : "The word "scrub" , before the words "oak trees" , deleting the words 4 inch in diameter or greater than" , deleting the word "either" and replacing Page 7 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 1988 it with "firstly" , and adding the word "secondly" , after the word "or" . Dr . Spagna did not have any objection to the changes, and the gopher tortoise stipulation. MOTION: Made by Ms. Kurgis to recommend approval of Petition No. R-88-23C, subject to standard Stipulations 1 - 4, and Stipulations 5 & 6. Seconded by Dr. Benedict. Carried 5/0. STIPULATIONS: 1 . Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance 75-21 (or the tree/vegetation removal ordinance in existence at the time of permitting) , requiring the acquisition of a tree removal permit prior to any land clearing. A site clearing plan shall be submitted to the Natural Resources Management Department for their review and sub- ject to approval prior to any work on the site . This plan may be submitted in phases to coincide with the development schedule . The site clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final site layout incorporates retained native vegeta- tion to the maximum extent possible and how roads, buildings, lakes, parking lots, and other facilities have been oriented to accommodate this goal . 2 . Native species shall be utilized, as described below, in the site landscaping plan. A landscape plan for all landscaping on the deve- lopment shall be submitted to the County Landscape Architect and to a County Environmental Specialist for their review and shall be subject to their approval . The landscape design shall incorporate a minimum of 60% native plants, by number, including trees, shrubs, and ground cover . At least 60% of the trees, 60% of the shrubs, and 60% of the ground cover shall be native species. At the direction of the County Landscape Architect or County Environmental Specialist a higher percentage of trees or shrubs can offset an equal percentage of groundcover . For example, the use of 70% native trees could allow the use of only 50% native groundcover. This plan shall depict the incorporation of native species and their mix Page 8 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 1988 with other species, if any. The goal of site landscaping shall be the re-creation of native vegetation and habitat characteristics lost on the site during construction or due to past activities. 3 . All exotic plants, as defined in the County Code, shall be removed during each phase of construction from development areas, open space areas, and preserve areas. Following site deve- lopment , a maintenance program shall be imple- mented to prevent reinvasion of the site by such exotic species. This plan, which will describe control techniques and inspection intervals, shall be filed with and subject to approval by the Natural Resources Management Department and the Community Development Division. 4. If , during the course of site clearing, excava- tion, or other constructional activities, an archaeological or historical site, artifact , or other indicator is discovered, all development at that location shall be immediately stopped and the Natural Resources Management Department notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the Natural Resources Management Department or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action in regard to its salva- geability. The Natural Resources Management Department will respond to any such notification in a timely and efficient manner so as to pro- vide only a minimal interruption to any constructional activities. 5 . The petitioner shall preserve 50% of the scrub oak trees on site. This may be accomplished by firstly leaving the trees in their existing locations or secondly by transplanting the trees for use as landscaping components in the deve- lopment . This stipulation will become a con- dition of the Tree Removal Permit which will be required for any clearing activity on site, by authority of Ordinance 75-21 . 6 . The petitioner agrees to protect gopher tor- toises found on site and relocating them to other suitable areas approved by the NRMD. Page 9 �-. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 1988 sss PETITION NO. R-88-24C/PDA-88-13C FILED BY/FOR: Robert H. Grabner, Jr . , of Ericksen Corporation, representing Radnor/Lakeside Corporation. REQUESTING: A zoning change from A-2 to PUD for 20 multi- family units, and an amendment to the Citrus Gardens PUD and Master Plan. COMMENTS: Mr . Grabner, representing the petitioner, advised that currently the Citrus Gardens PUD is being developed on the east side of Airport Road, and north of Pine Ridge Road. He stated that the additional 5 acre strip of land abuts the eastern boundary of the property, and is 137 feet wide. He stated that 20 units will be constructed on the additional parcel . He noted that this parcel has been utilized as a drainage easement and a small portion of an adjacent citrus grove . Ms. Stevens advised that the existing PUD con- sists of 93 . 6 acres of land and the dwelling units will increase from 376 units to 396 units. She stated that the PUD will include 8 residen- tial tracts; the loop road will change to a pri- vate road. She reiterated that the 5 acres consists of a drainage easement and a small por- tion of an adjacent citrus grove . She noted that most of the vegetation consists of exotic trees such as Brazilian pepper and herbaceous groundcover. She stated that the proposed amendments will have a relatively minimal effect on the environment in the area. She indicated that Staff recommends approval of the petitions subject to standard Stipulations 1 , 3 , and 4. Responding to Mr . Cardillo, Ms. Stevens advised that the 1986 stipulations have already been taken care of by the developer . Mr. Cardillo advised Mr. Grabner that the original stipula- tions are still applicable; Mr. Grabner did not have any objections to this. Dr . Benedict recommended that Standard Stipulation No. 2 be left in place, and as pre- ^ Page 10 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 1988 viously stated the revised version will apply if approved. Mr . Grabner stated that he did not have any problems with the inclusion of Stipulation No. 2 . MOTION: Made by Mr. Below to recommend approval of Petitions R-88-24C & PDA-88-13C, subject to standard Stipulations 1 - 4. Seconded by Dr. Benedict. Carried 5/0. STIPULATIONS : 1 . Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance 75-21 (or the tree/vegetation removal ordinance in existence at the time of permitting) , requiring the acquisition of a tree removal permit prior to any land clearing. A site clearing plan shall be submitted to the Natural Resources Management Department for their review and sub- ject to approval prior to any work on the site. This plan may be submitted in phases to coincide with the development schedule. The site clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final site layout incorporates retained native vegeta- tion to the maximum extent possible and how roads, buildings, lakes, parking lots, and other facilities have been oriented to accommodate this goal . 2 . Native species shall be utilized, as described below, in the site landscaping plan. A landscape plan for all landscaping on the deve- lopment shall be submitted to the County Landscape Architect and to a County Environmental Specialist for their review and shall be subject to their approval . The landscape design shall incorporate a minimum of 60% native plants, by number, including trees, shrubs, and ground cover . At least 60% of the trees, 60% of the shrubs, and 60% of the ground cover shall be native species. At the direction of the County Landscape Architect or County Environmental Specialist a higher percentage of trees or shrubs can offset an equal percentage of ground cover. For example, the use of 70% native trees could allow the use of only 50% native ground cover. This plan shall depict the incorporation of native species and their mix with other species, if any. The goal of site j Page 11 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 1988 landscaping shall be the re-creation of native vegetation and habitat characteristics lost on the site during construction or due to past activities. 3 . All exotic plants, as defined in the County Code, shall be removed during each phase of construction from development areas, open space areas, and preserve areas. Following site deve- lopment, a maintenance program shall be imple- mented to prevent reinvasion of the site by such exotic species. This plan, which will describe control techniques and inspection intervals, shall be filed with and subject to approval by the Natural Resources Management Department and the Community Development Division. 4. If , during the course of site clearing, excava- tion, or other constructional activities, an archaeological or historical site, artifact , or other indicator is discovered, all development at that location shall be immediately stopped and the Natural Resources Management Department notified. Development will be suspended for a / N sufficient length of time to enable the Natural Resources Management Department or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action in regard to its salva- geability. The Natural Resources Management Department will respond to any such notification in a timely and efficient manner so as to pro-- vide only a minimal interruption to any constructional activities. *** ITEM: Proposed revision of Standard Stipulation No. 2 COMMENTS: Environmental Inspector Muldoon advised that she had been requested to incorporate some standards into Stipulation No. 2 , as there have been complaints by landscapers and landscape archi- tects. She noted revisions of Stipulation No. 2 have been drafted for EAC recommendation and approval . She noted that Revision "A" deli- neates the standard that 60% of native plants will be incorporated into the landscape plan. She noted that the only change is that the groundcover component will not be included in Page 12 n ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 1988 determining the 509 requirement where landscaping is required in parking lots and other small areas adjacent to heavy vehicular use. She stated that it is Staff ' s opinion that the re-creation of native habitat in these areas is not feasible . She stated that the advantage of Revision "A" is that it maintains the same percentage that landscapers and landscape archi- tects are accustomed to, and it offers flexibi- lity. She stated that the disadvantage is that all plants are weighed equally e.g. trees, shrubs, and ground covers. Referring to Revision "B" , she advised that EAC comments have been incorporated and the components of the landscape design have been broken down into dif- ferent percentages. She stated that the advan- tage of this revision is that the weight percentage for trees is greater than shrubs, and it offers an alternative for the use of native plants by number. She noted that the disadvan- tage of the revision is that it will be more difficult for landscapers. She requested the EAC comments and changes to the revisions. Landscape Architect McCoy recommended that Revision "A" be adopted. She indicated that the County' s requirements should be like other counties. She gave percentages in other Counties e.g. Lee County requires 50% in native trees. She noted that the numerical break-down will create a lot of chaos in the review pro- cess, and will be time consuming. She reiterated that Revision "A" would be the most appropriate. Dr. Benedict stated that Collier County has a lot more native species than other counties, and therefore should not be consistent with what is currently being required in surrounding counties. He indicated that developers should be educated to comply with the new requirements. Ms. McCoy rebutted that developers are not complying with the requirements. Dr . Benedict , however, stated that developers must adhere to the environmental standards set by the County. He indicated preference to Revision "B" and the following verbiage after Native trees, " (As defined is the County Ordinance) " . Ms. Muldoon noted that native trees are defined dif- n ferently in the Code. Page 13 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7 , 1988 Responding to Dr . Benedict , Ms. Muldoon advised that the "small areas" are areas within parking lots that have a small 5 foot strip around them. Dr . Snyder indicated that an exception should not be made in any given area, and the strips should not have to be treated any differently. Referring to Revision "B" , Ms . Muldoon noted that Staff has requested that native plant spe- cies be utilized as per the percentages deli- neated with the exception of the small areas. Mr. Cardillo indicated that the aforementioned should be left to the discretion of the County' s Landscape Architect or the Environmental Specialist , to determine what the small area should be . Ms. McCoy stated that the Environmental Specialist reviews the native plant numbers, however, he reviews both the native plants and the landscape design. She indicated that she did not foresee any problems in determining n which areas can be designated as a small area. Dr. Benedict stated that it is important that standards are set , and reiterated that Collier County cannot implement standards used by extre- mely urbanized counties such as Hillsborough County. Mr . Cardillo suggested that the following ver- biage be added to the last sentence of Revision "B" : "At the discretion of the County Landscape Architect or the County Environmental Specialist , the above groundcovers specifica- tions may not apply where landscaping is required for parking lots and other small areas adjacent to heavy vehicular use" . Dr . Snyder recommended that Revision "A" and "B" be incorporated as delineated under "Stipulations" . He stated that a higher percen- tage of trees or shrubs can offset an equal per- centage of groundcover utilized. After further discussion, the EAC determined that Revisions "A" and "B" be incorporated with the percentages set at 60% for native trees, native shrubs and n native groundcovers. Page 14 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7 , 1988 Dr . Spagna indicated that the Tree Ordinance represents the consensus of what the community feels landscaping requirements should be. He stated that developers like to adhere to the County' s requirements set by the Ordinance. He suggested that the Landscape Ordinance be amended through the proper procedure of a public hearing. Dr . Benedict expounded that EAC Stipulations fill in the gaps that the County Ordinance does not address. He stated that an Ordinance will eventually be drafted to set criteria for the EAC, as per the new Comprehensive Plan. He noted that EAC Stipulations are merely additions to recommendations, which have become a policy to apply them to petitions. Mr. Below stated that developers have been agreeable to the Stipulations, and presently all Staff is trying to accomplish is to reword Stipulation No. 2 so that the procedure can be enforceable. Dr . Benedict advised that the County will be revising its Ordinances, as well as adding criteria to the environmental stan- dards. Ms. Muldoon noted that due to past problems it has become necessary to revise and reword Stipulation No. 2 to ascertain that developers comply with the landscaping requirements. Dr . Benedict recommended the following changes to Revision "A" : "The landscape design shall incorporate a mini- mum of 60% native trees, 60% native shrubs, and 60% native groundcover. As an alternative, at the discretion of the County Landscape Architect or the County Environmental Specialist , percen- tages required in native groundcover may be reduced with an equivalent increase in the required native tree and native shrub percentages" . MOTION: Made by Dr. Benedict to recommend approval of Revision "A" as modified. Seconded by Ms. Kurgis. This motion was withdrawn to incor- porate further language into Stipulation No. 2. Page 15 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7 , 1988 MOTION: Made by Dr. Snyder to recommend approval of Standard Stipulation No. 2, Revision "A" as amended, and with the inclusion of the last sen- tence of Standard Stipulation No. 2. Seconded by Dr. Benedict. Carried 5/0. REVISION "A" STANDARD STIPULATION NO. 2 : 2 . Native species shall be utilized, as described below, in the site landscaping plan. A landscape plan for all landscaping on the development shall be submitted to the County Landscape Architect and to a County Environmental Specialist for their review and shall be subject to their approval . The landscape design shall incorporate a minimum of 60% native plants, by number, including trees, shrubs, and ground cover. At least 60% of the trees, 60% of the shrubs, and 60% of the groundcover shall be native species. At the direction of the County Landscape Architect or County Environmental Specialist a higher percentage of trees or shrubs can offset an equal percentage of groundcover . For example, the use of 70% native trees could allow the use of only 50% native groundcover . This plan shall depict the incorporation of native species and their mix with other species, if any. The goal of site landscaping shall be the re-creation of native vegetation and habitat characteristics lost on the site during construction or due to past activities. ss* ITEM: Status Report on EAC Applications COMMENTS: In response to Dr . Benedict , Mr. Burch advised that he was not aware that applications received by his office were part of the EAC review process. Mr . Cardillo suggested that all the new applications be provided to the EAC prior to the next schedule meeting in order to make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. ss: ITEM: New Comprehensive Plan COMMENTS: Dr . Benedict advised that a committee comprised of six members has been diligently working on Page 16 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 1988 a revision of the Coastal and Conservation Element of the Comp Plan. He stated that on December 15 the Planning Commission will be reviewing the revised Goals, Objectives and Policies of the aforementioned. He suggested that the EAC review a copy of the latter and make comments or recommendations. :*s There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair . ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL John P. Cardillo, Chairman Page 17