Loading...
BCC Minutes 02/18/2003 S (Creation of Beachwalk-Pavilion Club-Regatta-Naples Park MSTU)February 18, 2003 TRANSCRIPT OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Naples, Florida, February 18, 2003 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m. in SPECIAL SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Tom Henning Donna Fiala Jim Coletta Frank Halas Fred Coyle ALSO PRESENT: Jim Mudd, County Administrator Ed Kant, Transportation Operations Director David Weigel, County Attorney Page 1 NOTICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL MEETING Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:00 A.M. - Time Certain Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a special meeting on TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 1 8, 2 003, a t 9:00 a .m., time certain, in the Board Meeting Room, Third Floor, Harmon Turner Building (Administration), Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, to consider the following item: REQUEST BOARD CONSIDER THE CREATION OF THE BEACHWALK- PAVILION CLUB-REGATTA-NAPLES PARK MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT (MSTU) FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A FUNDING SOURCE FOR PLACING FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT (FPL) TRANSMISSION LINES UNDERGROUND ALONG 91sT AVENUE NORTH AND A PORTION OF VANDERBILT DRIVE This item will be considered prior to the scheduled Water and Wastewater Master Plan, Impact Fee, and User Rate Study Workshop at the same location. All interested parties are invited to attend, to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the Board prior to the special meeting. All registered public speakers will be limited to five (5) minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the Chairman. The meeting will be open to the public. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record indicates the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Collier County Ordinance No. 99-22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners), register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, 34112, (941) 774-8380; assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the County Commissioners' Office. BOARD OF COU'NTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Tom Henning, Chairman DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By:/s/Maureen Kenyon Deputy Clerk February 18, 2003 CHAIRMAN HENNING: Would you all rise for the pledge of allegiance, please. (Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) Item: CREATION OF THE BEACHWALK-PAVILION CLUB- REGATTA-NAPLES PARK MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT (MSTU) FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A FUNDING SOURCE FOR PLACING FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT (FPL) TRANSMISSION LINES UNDERGROUND ALONG 91oo,T AVENUE NORTH AND A PORTION OF VANDERBILT DRIVE- STAFF TO PREPARE ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTS; ADVERTISE A DRAFT MSTU ORDINANCE AS OUTLINED IN THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO INCLUDE ALL OF NAPLES PARK, REGATTA, BF, ACHWAIJK~ AND PAVIIJON- APPROVED CHAIRMAN HENNING: First order of business, we have an emergency meeting to consider an MSTU, and then we're going to have a workshop on our wastewater and water impact fees. So County Manager Jim Mudd? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. The -- ma'am, it's a hot seat. No. Anybody smell anything that's burning? COMMISSIONER FIALA: Jim and I both smell it, yes, you can smell it. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: That's us cooking. We're ready to go. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Okay, I don't see any smoke, so let's carry on. MR. MUDD: The first item is a request to the board. It is a special meeting of the Board of County Commissioners that was Page 2 February 18, 2003 announced at your board meeting last week on Tuesday that we would talk about an MSTU for the Naples power area around 91st Street. And let me read the topic on this one. It's request board considera -- to consider the creation of the Beachwalk-Pavilion Club-Naples Park municipal services taxing unit, MSTU, for the purpose of providing a funding source for placing Florida Power & Light transmission lines underground along 91 st Avenue North, from Eighth Street North to Vanderbilt Drive. And the person to present this is Ed Kant. MR. KANT: Good morning, Commissioners. Edward Kant, transportation operations director. This is really a very straightforward item. The board requested that staff prepare some background data for the creation of an MSTU to place these lines underground. There is on the visualizer a picture of the area -- excuse me a second. We're going to point out in a minute where the boundaries are. That's the comer of Eighth; that's the comer'of-- that's Vanderbilt Beach, around the Pavilion, and come up to 93rd. Down -- actually, it would be the line between 93rd and 94th, and then down Vanderbilt again to Vanderbilt Beach. We looked at the area, and as was pointed out at the board meeting, this was an issue of the visual impact, and those appear to be the areas most heavily impacted, which included the Beachwalk Club, the -- Beachwalk condominium, the Pavilion Club and those single-family homes up through the first tier on the north side of 93rd. As is shown on the executive summary, the value -- the taxable value within that area is approximately 104.5 million, which would provide about 104,000 for one mil. The estimated cost provided by FP&L to place those lines underground -- that would be the additional cost, the differential only -- is about 58 to $60,000. There's also -- there are some administrative costs associated Page 3 February 18, 2003 with the formation of the MSTU, even if it's only carried through for one year. Staff, in order to be somewhat conservative, has put about a $10,000 estimate on that. We anticipate it would in fact be somewhat lower. But for the purposes of discussion, the millage that would be necessary to fund that $70,000 in a single year would be about two-thirds of a mil., about .67. Again, based on information provided by the assessor's office for the average home with $125,000 taxable value, that would be about an $84 assessment for that improvement. FP&L has applied for and received their right-of-way permit for the overhead. That permit was issued in conformance with our standard practices. At the time that was issued there was no issue that we were aware of between overhead versus underground. Having presented that to you, we also in our recommendation are requesting that if the board decides that this MSTU should go forward, that it would be formed for the sole purpose of facilitating the funding of the underground placement of the FP&L transmission line, that the tax levy would be such that the entire cost of the project could be reimbursed in one year, and we're basing the request on the amount to be financed at about 70,000, subject to refinement, once we get some final numbers from FP&L from the budget office and from the assessor's office. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Question by a member of the board to Mr. Kant? Let's go to public speakers. MR. MUDD: Mr. Chairman, we have three speakers. The first speaker is Vera Fitz-Gerald, followed by John Hickey. MS. FITZ-GERALD: I'm Vera Fitz-Gerald, Naples Park. When we first started to talk about this, we thought well, maybe we should just have the affected people, the people who could actually see this should have to pay and not the rest. But we sent out Page 4 February 18, 2003 an e-mail to, oh, I don't know, maybe 450 people, and we started getting responses. And I apologize to Jim Mudd and Commissioner Halas, I forwarded a lot of them. Then I started to feel guilty. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Good for you. MS. FITZ-GERALD: And I said I'm sorry I'm stuffing your e-mail box, but I didn't get any people saying no, I won't support this. People all across Naples Park, from the far north end, 110th, they all said let's all support 91st. This is a blight on our entire neighborhood, we're going through a beautification study, let's all get behind this and support it. And a simple math, and I like to simplify things, say there's 3,000 property owners, there's another 350 in Beachwalk, there's another 150 or so, you take that figure and divide it into 60,000, you're talking 10 to $20 a property. And everybody that we talked to said go for it. So I think that -- and I'm speaking for a lot of people on this, people who have contacted me, telephone calls, I haven't got one person who said no, I don't want to do this. They all said 10 to 20. A lot of them said no more than 20, but 10 to 20, they said. There's one comment I'd like to make, and I wish the transportation department would not be so quick to rubber stamp these permits. I wish they'd take a few minutes just to consider the impact on the affected neighborhoods, and maybe give us a heads up so we could do something. And things like the poles on 99th wouldn't have happened, the poles on the front yards of 91 st wouldn't have happened. And they really need to stop and give that. But anyway, I'm speaking for a lot of people in Naples Park who are all saying include us, we're going to help; 10 to 20 bucks isn't too much to help our neighborhood. So I hope you'll consider that when you're considering the boundaries of the MSTU. And again, I apologize to those two gentlemen. The power of the computer. Page 5 February 18, 2003 MR. MUDD: Next speaker will be John Hickey, followed by George Pacanovsky. Close, I hope. MR. HICKFJY: Thank you. I'd just like to give you a couple of statistics to support what Vera is saying about the Naples Park opinion on burying the line. She put my name and number in part of a little article in her newsletter, and I received 72 phone calls from people in Naples Park. And I tried to record all of them. And I would say 90 percent of those -- I asked the question, if they would be willing to support this monetarily as well as signing something, and 90 percent of them said yes. We also -- most of the responses I got, a good 90 percent of them were from folks north in Naples Park of 91st Avenue. My second point is in making a consideration of the area to be included, I think that the southern building of Chateau Vanderbilt, which would be, I would estimate, 10 units, I don't know whether you can see it clearly on the map, but I think you can, there are two units and they are on Vanderbilt Drive. They're two-story white condominiums. And I think that they have a clear visual site down 91 st Avenue. And the third point I would make is that Regatta was completely removed from the consideration here of the units to be included, because FPL told staff that the power lines along Regatta's east side and south side were going to remain on poles. That's true. However, the building in the northeast comer of Regatta -- Regatta consists of five highrises -- the building in the northeast comer has a clear view down 91st Avenue. And I'm just putting out for your consideration that that building also be included in the count. And again, many thanks to County Manager Mudd and staff for the job that they did in putting this together in three working days. I think that's nothing short of unbelievable. And thank you all for your consideration. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Can I say something? Page 6 February 18, 2003 CHAIRMAN HENNING: Commissioner Halas? COMMISSIONER HALAS: I just want to thank John Hickey and Vera Fitz-Gerald and all the other community leaders that got actively involved in this thing. And I think it goes to show what happens when people put their minds to something and they make a determination that they want to try to better their neighborhood. I also feel that the comment that was brought up in the discussion here by public speakers that yes, I think that transportation or the people who are involved in regards to new power lines going in, I believe that we need to address that to the people that's going to be affected prior to releasing those permits so that those people, if they have any problems with it, that they can be addressed in an orderly manner, and we don't have to jump through hoops, as staff has done on this. And I believe whether it's public meetings put on by FPL and not so much the staff, I think that may be something that we need to look into so that people realize what FPL is up to. Because sometimes these can have a large effect on the quality of life we have in our area. And I want to thank you very much for everybody's participation in this matter. MR. PACANOVSKY: Good morning, Commissioners. I have a piece of correspondence to read to you, which is created by the board of directors of the Pavilion Club. My name is George Pacanovsky. I am the vice president of the Pavilion Club. This is directed to Commissioner Tom Henning, Collier County Commissioner. Dear Commissioner Henning: The Pavilion Club Condominium Association will not participate in the municipal services taxing unit for the purpose of funding the placement of the FPL transmission lines underground. Our initial participation in the protestation of FPL's placing these lines on 50-foot poles was strictly as a good neighbor, and we made it very clear at the start that our members would not pay any Page 7 February 18, 2003 monies to facilitate this action. The erection of these poles has little effect on our members and, in fact, the plans submitted by FPL indicate the only pole on our easement would still be erected as a feeder to the underground. The unilateral decision of the county and FPL was made without any input from the people who are being asked to fund the additional cost which, in our opinion, is neither democratic nor fair. At this time we wish to go on record that the Pavilion Club Condominium Association has no interest in FPL's action of the placement of the transmission lines. We will not pay any assessment to fund the final decision. Should the county and FPL continue to include the Pavilion Club in the MSTU, our members have unanimously asked us to pursue other avenues to legally exclude our participation. Sincerely, Doris Jean Rand, President, Pavilion Club Association. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Your name for the record, sir? MR. PACANOVSKY: George Pacanovsky. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Commissioner Coletta has a question. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Would you help me out, sir, and show me where the Pavilion Club is? Or if somebody could possibly? COMMISSIONER HALAS: It's right there. MR. MUDD: It's this part right in here, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER HALAS: And the red line in that-- right there in that comer, that's where the power line would come across 91st Street and go on the south side. Right there it impacts the Pavilion Club. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Okay, thank you, sir. MR. PACANOVSKY: You're welcome. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Sir, I've got a question. I had an e-mail from your president who said that she was in favor of Pavilion Page 8 February 18, 2003 being involved in this early on. And what's changed her mind? MR. PACANOVSKY: As we said, we were supporting Naples Park in that respect. We did not know that there would be monies involved as -- COMMISSIONER HALAS: So you wouldn't be in favor of those lines above ground then-- MR. PACANOVSKY: Actually-- COMMISSIONER HALAS: -- because it's $84 that might come out of your pocket. MR. PACANOVSKY: Actually, sir, it really doesn't really make that much difference, because we have one pole now. And the amount of feet that's involved on our property is 270 feet, which is minimal. We're looking at one pole now, so it doesn't make any difference if there's -- if that pole stays or another pole goes up in that area. We're talking about one pole, that's all. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Commissioner Coletta has another question. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: If you would, please, sir, I've never been in your neighborhood. I wish I was, but some day I may get that opportunity. Is it a gated community? MR. PACANOVSKY: Yes, it is. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Okay, and where's the gate on this community? MR. PACANOVSKY: The gate, it's actually on Gulf Pavilion Drive. It's off Vanderbilt Beach Road. CHAIRMAN HENNING: That's west of U.S. 41. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Okay, I see it now. Thank you. MR. PACANOVSKY: Okay, you're welcome. Do you all members -- do you commissioners have copies of the letter? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Yes. Thank you. CHAIRMAN HENNING: The wish of the board? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: If I may open the topic for Page 9 February 18, 2003 conversation. I thought it was -- I personally like the boundaries. I just would like to see that included down over here at the end. What was the name of this one.9 COMMISSIONER HALAS: Regatta. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Golden Gate Estates. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Regatta be included into that. What did you say? CHAIRMAN HENNING: Nothing. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: You weren't making an Italian joke, were you? I hope not. I would make a motion that we approve this MSTU according to these boundaries to include also the Regatta. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Can I say something? When this all started, I was under the impression that we were going -- that this line was going to be buried when it first came into Naples Park, and it was going to be buried all the way until it crossed the road down at the -- on Vanderbilt Beach Road, right across from the Ritz-Carlton. What has changed in this thing? Because I was under the impression that that was -- MR. KANT: Commissioner, perhaps I can assist you. Based on CHAIRMAN HENNING: Mr. Kant, just one minute. MR. KANT: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN HENNING: We have a motion on the floor. I would ask the motion maker to withdraw to let the -- out of respect of the commissioner of the district. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: I'd be more than happy to. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Thank you. Proceed. MR. KANT: Yes, sir. The correspondence that we've had with FP&L indicates that the -- if you look on the drawing, I believe everybody received one of these in your package. The blue line indicates the existing overhead, which goes from U.S. 41 to Eighth Page 10 February 18, 2003 Street. That was to remain. And at Eighth Street they were going to come down. And if they go underground it would be from Eighth Street to Vanderbilt Drive, along the south side of 91st. There is existing overhead along Vanderbilt Drive and Vanderbilt Beach, and they were merely going to tie into that, come back up again at Vanderbilt to tie into that. That was the reason for not including the Regatta. However, you know, we're just awaiting direction at this point. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Okay. Well, again, if they're using existing poles on Vanderbilt Drive and then using existing poles to go west on Vanderbilt Beach Road, why didn't they just use the existing poles that are on Vanderbilt Beach Road all the way back to U.S. 41.9 They told us at the time they couldn't use it, but yet they're going to use the existing poles once they get out of Naples Park and then go across the street over here on Vanderbilt Drive, head south and then go west on Vanderbilt Beach Road, and using existing poles. They've got existing poles on Vanderbilt Beach Road heading east, all the way back to 41. MR. KANT: That's correct. That's the question that's put to FP&L, sir. We're not in a position to determine how -- what decisions they've made. As far as the boundaries, I would like to point out that if the board's direction is to -- again, this item was to consider the creation of the MSTU. If the board's direction is to move forward, we would obviously have to come back to you with the ordinance for advertising. The time line for this, again, just so that you're familiar with the way the MSTU would be created, we would have to have the MSTU boundaries determined and the MSTU itself created prior to December 31 st of this year so that it could go on the tax rolls for next year. Page 11 February 18, 2003 That-- as I pointed out in the executive summary, the first income from that would be in fiscal year 2005. It would go on the tax bill for 2004. FP&L has indicated that if it is the board's desire to move in that direction, that they would permit a deferral of that repayment to them. During the course of the discussions we heard several different requests as far as boundaries; in one case to include all of Naples Park, in one case to include a community that was not included. And again, that is an area that we can bring back and ask for further direction on. We have no real time crunch in the sense that we have some time to create this because it can't go on the tax rolls until next year anyhow. I also -- I think it's important to address the concern that Commissioner Halas brought up with respect to our ability to stop and require public meetings or public hearings. Under our current ordinances, when someone applies for a right-of-way permit, whether that's utility or private individual, as long as they meet the engineering requirements, we're bound to issue that permit with whatever stipulations may be required in terms of maintenance and traffic and that type of thing. If it's the board's direction that that ordinance be reviewed or if some other procedure is to be put in place, we'll be happy to sit down with the community development division and try to work that out. But under our current procedures and ordinances, if the engineering plans and if they meet all of those criteria are correct, there's no reason that we should not be able to issue that permit. If we don't issue the permit, we may find ourselves in a very negative position. And so as a result, we're very careful to review these from the engineering and from the maintenance of traffic. But as I say, there is no constraint on our issuing the permit, if all those conditions are met. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Commissioner Halas? Page 12 February 18, 2003 COMMISSIONER HALAS: I think that what -- we need to address that, because I believe that not only in District 2 are we going to run across more of these problems, but I believe that we've got other districts out there that may have the same thing. And I think that people are well aware of the fact that they'd like to better their communities eventually. We've got Golden Gate City that eventually's got power lines all over the place, and I think they're going to want to address them. And I think there's other areas down in District 1 that may want to someday address new power lines going in. And I think that if there is concern of the people, all they have to do is at least have -- they being FPL -- have a meeting set up to whereby the residents can come in and state, you know, how they feel about it, and they can decide whether they want to have an MSTU, or whether we -- maybe eventually we'll want to look at something as far as a franchise fee and look at something of this nature countywide. But at least we give the people the option to at least hear what's going on with FPL prior to the county issuing permits. And I understand where you're coming from, you're bound by law. But I also think we need to address that area of concern for residents. Thank you. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Commissioner Halas, I heard a little bit of old issues that we addressed at the last meeting, so we need to remove that. If you have some new ideas, if I may suggest to the county manager if we can put this up at a future BCC agenda for consideration and let us see the pros and cons of Commissioner Halas's suggestion. MR. MUDD: You want the -- Mr. Chairman, you want the ordinance to come back and you can take a look at the ordinance and tell us which things you want us to add or delete? CHAIRMAN HENNING: Well, and I think at that time we Page 13 February 18, 2003 need to know the pros and cons of that. Every time government takes action, there's an opposite reaction. Okay, Commissioner Fiala? COMMISSIONER FIALA: Thank you. Could we also have staff, as long as they're doing this, check on why they're not putting the new lines on the poles that are already existing? Or isn't that something we do? CHAIRMAN HENNING: Your question again? MR. MUDD: Commissioner, when we asked FPL why they didn't use the lines going behind the houses from Vanderbilt down, and there's also -- from what I understand, there's existing lines that go behind the houses, behind 91 st and behind the 92nd houses along this run, and it had to do with money. And the second stringing in that process would cost them too much money, from what they told us at the meeting. And so that's what we asked when we sat in that meeting with them, I asked them why they didn't go down Vanderbilt, why they didn't use existing lines through neighborhoods to double string. We went through that entire process, and it was basically more cost-effective for them to take the red line overhead look with new poles in the ground in order to do that, and even raise the poles higher than the other ones to stretch across existing poles. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Commissioner Coyle? COMMISSIONER COYLE: Mr. Chairman, we dealt with all this at our last meeting. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Correct. COMMISSIONER COYLE: You know, our objective right now is to act on a recommendation by staff concerning an MSTU. And if we're going to do that, I suggest we do it and get it done; otherwise, it's going to be too late. If we go back and study this issue much longer, we're not going to get this done. So I would suggest that we give Commissioner Halas an opportunity to make a motion Page 14 February 18, 2003 with respect to this MSTU and let's get on with it. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Thank you. COMMISSIONER HALAS: I make a motion that we go ahead with this MSTU, and I think we ought to include all of Naples Park. That way it would defray the cost, from the input that was brought forth in the discussion. So let's include the MSTU, all of Naples Park in that. MR. KANT: Thank you, Commissioners. CHAIRMAN HENNING: We have a motion on the floor. COMMISSIONER FIALA: I'll second that. CHAIRMAN HENNING: We have a second by Commissioner Fiala. Anymore discussion on this item? COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Just one more question. What about the Regatta, being that it lines right up? COMMISSIONER HALAS: I'd like to see if we could include the Regatta, yes. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Commissioner Fiala, that's part of your second? COMMISSIONER FIALA: Yes, I'll second that. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Okay, there's a motion by Commissioner Halas, second by Commissioner Fiala. All in favor of the motion, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER COLETTA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FIALA: COMMISSIONER COYLE: COMMISSIONER HALAS: CHAIRMAN HENNING: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN HENNING: MR. KANT: Aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Motion carries 5-0. Thank you, Commissioners. Page 15 February 18, 2003 MR. MUDD: Question, Commissioners, before--just for clarification. You heard a request about the Pavilion. Is that included in the particular motion? Is it basically this yellow line with the Regatta that touches, plus the entirety of Naples Park? COMMISSIONER HALAS: And Beachwalk. MR. MUDD: And Beachwalk. COMMISSIONER HALAS: Right. And depending upon the legality, I think that Pavilion Club should be included in that. But if there's a legality problem there, then I think that needs to be addressed prior to putting all the final paperwork together. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Kant. MR. KANT: Thank you, Commissioners. Commissioners, before we -- if I may, Commissioner Henning, Mr. Weigel has reminded me that one of the things that FP&L has asked us is to ascertain that there will be a commitment on behalf of the board for this payment of the roughly $60,000. It's my understanding that because you've directed us to go forward with the MSTU, that does provide the funding mechanism. I just want the record to state that so there could be no question when we go back to FP&L. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Correct, that's my understanding, and I see everybody's head shaking. MR. KANT: Thank you, Commissioners. CHAIRMAN HENNING: Thank you. We're going to adjourn the special meeting and open up the workshop on the wastewater and water impact fees. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 9:30 a.m. Page 16 February 18, 2003 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS OM HENNING, Chairfhan - AT~EST:,;~ ;;;~.~.'; V~GHT E' gl~OCK '-- 's~f' ute on~.~f~'~ These minutes approved by the Board on presented ~ or as co~ected _, as TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC. BY CHERIE NOTTINGHAM Page 17