The URL can be used to link to this page

EAC Agenda 12/01/2004 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL AGENDA December 1, 2004 9:00 A.M. Commission Boardroom W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F") —Third Floor I. Roll Call II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of November 03, 2004 Meeting minutes IV. Growth Management Plan Amendment 1. Transfer of Development Rights (TDRs) Bonus Amendment/Rural Fringe mixed Use District (Staff report will be sent under separate cover). V. Old Business VI. New Business VII. Council Member Comments VIII. Public Comments IX. Adjournment Council Members: Please notify the Environmental Services Department Administrative Assistant no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 24, 2004 if you cannot attend this meeting or if you have a conflict and will abstain from voting on a petition (403-2311). General Public: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. November 3, 2004 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER CONTY ENVIRONMNETAL ADVISORY BOARD Naples, Florida, November 3, 2004 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Environmental Advisory Board in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Alfred Gal William Hughes Judith Hushon Ken Humiston Michael V. Sorrell ALSO PRESENT: Stan Chrzanowki, Engineering Review Barbara Burgeson, Environmental Specialist Marjorie Student, Assistant County Attorney 1 November 3, 2004 Meeting was called to order by Chairman Alfred Gal at 9:03 AM. Roll call was taken with Joe Gammons being excused. A quorum was established. II. Approval of Agenda: Item C. will not need to be considered today it will be considered in the December meeting. William Hughes moved to approve the agenda. Second by Ken Humiston. Carried unanimously 5-0. III. Approval of September 30, 2004 Meeting minutes: Judith Hushon moved to approve the Minutes. Second by William Hughes. Carried unanimously 5-0. IV. Land Use Petitions: A. Planned Unit Development No. PUDZ-2003-AR-3608 "Orangetree PUD" Sections 13, 14, 23, & 24 Township 48 South, Range 27 E * Persons sworn in * No Disclosures Kelly Smith of Davidson Engineering- The Plan was originally adopted in November 1989. Several changes have been made including recent amendments. Developments have been made since this time. Several changes have been proposed such as an increase in residential density to 3,750 over the 2,100 units permitted at this time, this is a 1,650 unit increase. In the commercial zoned district and increase is being requested from 60,000 sq. ft. to 309,000 sq. ft. this would be an increase of 249,000 sq. ft. The document is being brought into current standards for PUD documents including the language. Questions- Alfred Gal- Is this part of a settlement agreement? Are the amounts of dwelling units a bargain amount? Kelly Smith- Yes Marjorie Student-Ms. Student was not with Collier County when the settlement agreement was made, therefore she does not have first hand knowledge of what transpired in the negotiation process. The history involved North Golden Gate Estates there was to be 8,000 units. There was a law suit about vested rights that occurred. This was the settlement of the lawsuit about the vested rights. The settlement agreement provides the terms and conditions are binding upon the 2 November 3, 2004 successors and run with the land. The PUD document does give provisions for amendment. Planning can answer more questions in regards to this. Kelly Smith- The settlement agreement vested 2,100 dwelling units, while providing that more units may be added on. It provided for permitting a greater density. Marjorie Student-It is the comprehensive plan that allows for this provision. Judith Hushon-Amazed at the small amount of wildlife on the site, only 4 animals on the entire site. The land has been so disturbed that the site needs to be cleaned up and make it inhabitable to bring the animals back. Jeremy Sterk-Table#2 of the survey is animals observed on the site. While table one is what could have been on the site. The site is extremely disturbed, it is under construction and there is a golf course in operation. Jeff Davidson- Site development plans are submitted. There is a core of engineer review of the site. Permits were given twelve years ago. Collier County continues to review each phase. William Hughes-The water tables are being raised to the south? And above the water field? Jeff Davidson-Everglades modification should not affect this high area. A well system for Orangetree water treatment plant exists so water is being held back. It is being recharged according to the State requirement. The pits are up to the Land Development code requirement. William Hughes-There is a future projection to meet the water and sewage needs for the 3,100 homes. Jeff Davidson-There is enough water, the sewage is being upgraded. There is a new reclaimed water filtrations system in order to help make it a self-sustaining development. Stan Krasowski-This project is totally surrounded by Golden Gates Estates. Golden Gates Estates has no water retention. Everyone is tapping into the same aquifer. Golden Gates Estates now has 10,000 units out of 30,000 possible units. When it approaches the 30,000 units with everyone being tapped into the same aquifer the problems will come up quickly unless the system stays ahead. William Hughes- A drought occurred in 1999 and 2000, how deep were the wells depressed in that area? 3 November 3, 2004 �-. Jeff Davidson-The wells are around 70-100 feet. DDP was just issued to allow for two more wells. Stan Chrzanowski-The wells were depressed around 6 feet. A well 2 miles east was completely dry, those were surface wells. Jeff Davidson-The wells were estimated to be 10 feet above sea level, he has not seen an abnormal drop, even during the dry season. William Hughes-Development is happening at such a rate that you can't deny citizens the right to use the property but at the same time taking care not to damage the surrounding community. These are long term issues. Could one of the buildings be a demonstration of technology to show alternative resources? Utilizing the large amount of energy that we have? Looking at a way for the future. Stan Chzranowski-Doing away with grass would help. Jeff Davidson- It is running off of reclaimed water William Hughes- 30 gallons of water come off of his A/C unit a day, which would be a usable high quality water source. Using solar energy to cool a house. The standard of mutual survival needs to be studied. Judith Hushon- Are the small lakes drying out in the dry season? Jeff Davidson-No, he has never seen the lakes drop below 10 feet. There is plenty of water in the lakes, and they have not looked unsightly. There is a large Golf Course that is well maintained. Public Comments- None Michael V. Sorrell- What will go into the proposed extension of the Commercial Unit? Jeff Davidson-All of the Commercial density is in the triangular piece that is only between 8-9 acres (Pointed area out on a map). It is slated to be an office. The residence would like to have a shopping center. Michael V. Sorrell- (Reference to map) On the bottom corner, are all the stacked covert pipes? Will a traffic signal be required in this area? 4 November 3, 2004 Jeff Davidson-The County tells when a traffic signal is warranted. Orangetree would like to have a traffic signal put in. At this time there is no plan to put one in. William Hughes- Would it be possible to have one unit set up? Jeff Davidson-He is not the builder to be able to answer that. William Hughes-Move to approve with consideration that one unit is developed as a model to show potentials for alternative technology. Ken Humiston-Second Motion Carried unanimously 5-0. V. Old Business: A. None VI. New Business: A. Total Maximum Daily Load presentation by Eric Livingston,D.E.P. Eric Livingston- Presentation given in power point Comments- William Hughes- How are the sample points derived? Eric Livingston- Prioritized, evaluation of water and existing monitoring programs. Judith Hushon- Are South West Florida Management district's current water monitoring program included? Eric Livingston-There are data sufficiency issues along with data quality issues that have to be looked at. There are legal requirements that have to be followed. Judith Hushon- It is not required when registering herbicides to have a water plant test. She is concerned about the run off of these herbicides, and there is no data to evaluate the affect. Eric Livingston- He has no legal authority to enter into this issue. The issue has been raised in the passed. There aren't any water quality standards given by the E.P.A. There are sediment tests that can qualitatively evaluate this, and hot spots can be identified. 5 it November 3, 2004 Ken Humiston-Two different groups took samples that came back as unrealistic samples. What is the quality control for date? Eric Livingston- 20 data elements are included such as time of collection, holding time, minimum detection level, and methodology of analysis. Data will be rejected if it is not sufficient. The date received has to be validated. Collectors are given training and the laboratories are under national accreditation programs. Audits are performed to make sure they are all followed. Judith Hushon- The Gordon River was on the list, does it include Naples Bay? Eric Livingston- No, Naples Bay is a separate water body. Stan Chzranowski- Do you ever audit the codes to see if it is friendly to the program? Eric Livingston- We are happy to do that,just send a request and where the code is located. Michael V. Sorrell- Under the SURP Program in the management plan it has always been a dumping ground, 70,000 yards of contaminated soil was found. This soil is going to be put around homes instead of being burned, or taken out. Eric Livingston- This may fall under the clean soil criteria. William Hughes-Thanked Eric Livingston for coming. Would like Stan working with Eric Livingston about the Codes. Public Speakers: Gary Davis, Conservancy of South West Florida- Supports the time taken to support the issues and thanked Eric Livingston. The Conservancy has been very involved in these programs. Estuaries in South West Florida are homes at some point in their life cycles to 95% of our commercially important fish species. The language was changed so that the County would develop the water sheds. Some plans are in process already such as the SWIM, and Water Management. DEP, USEPA and Water Management can all be partners. The Conservancy would be willing to work together with the County in taking a look at the codes. Please consider the Conservancy as a resource. Demonstration facilities are needed as mentioned previously. B. Workshop presentations of Sunshine Law/Ethics/Public Records/Ex-Parte * Wednesday,November 24, 2004 from 8:30 AM to 10:00 AM * Friday,December 10, 2004 from 2:30 PM to 4:00 PM Barbara Burgeson- This is not required but highly recommended. 6 November 3, 2004 Barbara Burgeson- Lighting pollution is being looked into. It has been found that Collier County is nearly double the maximum allowed Candle foot permitted, and is higher in comparison to other Counties. Stan Chzranowski- Corrections are going to have to be made, it is unknown who is working on water shed management. William Hughes- Glad to see real issues are being worked on now. VII. Council Member Comments None VIII. Public Comments None There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 10:55 AM. COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMNETAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chairman Alfred Gal 7 -- COLLIER COUNTY 1 AUDIJBON SOCIETY 0111111.1. 660 Ninth Street, North, Suite 32A Naples,FL 34102 239-643-7822 CollierAudubon@earthlink.net November 30, 2004 Environmental Advisory Council Alfred F. Gal, Jr., Chair c/o Barbara Burgeson Community Development and Environmental Services Collier County Government Via email RE: TDR Bonuses Comp Plan Amendments CP-2004-04 Dear EAC Members: Collier County Audubon Society, along with the Florida Wildlife Federation and the Collier Building Industry Association, has jointly proposed to amend the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)policies in the Comprehensive Plan for several important reasons, listed below. These issues were not foreseen in 2002 when the TDR program was originally adopted,but their recognition now demands a swift, effective response by the County. 1. There currently is no effective mechanism to achieve essential resource land management on any parcels from which the base TDR credit is severed. While land uses are somewhat controlled, lack of management will render habitats useless eventually. The best example is fire management needed for red-cockaded woodpecker habitat in North Belle Meade. The "Maintenance Bonus" TDR credit and perpetual maintenance fund payment will better incentivize accomplishment of this necessary outcome. 2. Without conveyance of titles to a conservation agency, landscape scale management and restoration becomes very difficult, especially for re-hydration of wetlands and fire management. An example of the restoration benefits of title transfer incentives is the possible re-hydration of significant portions of North Belle Meade using Golden Gate Canal water,both restoring parched wetlands and helping restore Naples Bay. 3. It is now evident that there is a shortage of TDR credits necessary to build Rural Villages in Receiving Areas. Without Villages, credits and density increases entitled by Sending Land transfers will have the much less satisfactory result of much less compact r development forms and inefficient use of rural land. Village help concentrate density increases and allow for better provision of services, transportation and rural open space. 4. Rural land prices have escalated to the point that the single base TDR credit is not enough to compensate for loss of development potential. Thus, landowners are not selling in the hopes of building"mansions"on 5 acre ranchettes, or selling to others for that purpose. This is not the intended outcome of Sending Lands and does not effectively protect the resources there, which would be severely compromised by a Golden Gate Estates style development pattern. Adding three more bonus TDR credits allows developers to offer enough additional money for the TDR credits, or the land outright, that landowners will be fairly compensated and sell. Without these additional incentives to sever TDR credits, there is a likelihood of failure of the program, which does very little to protect wetlands and listed species. Collier County Audubon Society strongly urges your recommendation of approval for these amendments. Sincerely, Bradley Cornell Environmental Policy Analyst November 17, 2004 /2 'S , AilECEIVED Mr. Alfred F. Gal '(,, � �16* NOV 1 9 2004 130 Pine Key Lane ll �I '" Naples, Fl. 34114 010 p � 0„,) Dear Mr. Gal, At a meeting I was attending a few weeks ago, we had a speaker from Ave Maria University. During the discussion part of the program, it was brought to the group's attention that Ave Maria has not brought the following before the EAC for review: An EIS A DRI An ACSC/ST I am writing to find out from you, as chairman, if this is correct information. I would appreciate hearing from you and I can be reached at 262-7292 or my e-mail address which is lindap9O43@aol.com. Thank you for taking the time to answer my concerns. Sincerely Linda S. Penniman cc: Bill Lorenz and Barbara Bergeson IHM HOLE MONTES EXHIBIT IV E ENGINEERS•PLANNERS•SURVEYORS 950 Encore Way• Naples,Florida 34110•Phone:239.2542000•Fax:239.254.2099 August 11, 2004 Revised October 1, 2004 Revised November 15,2004 Mr.David Weeks Collier County Planning Services Comprehensive Planning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,Florida 34104 SUBJECT: FLUE Placeholder Amendment-CP-2004-4 Dear Mr. Weeks: Attached are five copies of the FLUE placeholder amendment to increase the density bonus for TDR's as we discussed at our pre-application meeting along with a check in the amount of$16,450 to process the petition less the pre-application fee paid of $250.00. The petitioners are CBIA, Florida Wildlife Federation and Collier County Audubon. Background The FLUE calls for analysis of the TDR program to be conducted by February of next year to determine the program's validity. The purpose of this placeholder amendment is to insure that perceived pitfalls of the program are addressed early on in the program as an alternative to waiting until the 2005 amendment cycle to file an amendment that could not be approved until 2006 to address perceived pitfalls. It is presumed additional supplemental information can be added to the application after submittal to support the proposed amendment request. The amendments also address changes to the design standards for Rural Villages that came out of our stakeholder meetings on this and other issues related to the TDR program. The two components of the amendment are described as follows: 1. TDR Revisions Generally provides for density bonuses of up to three dwelling units per five acres of sending land or non-conforming lot of record for the following: a. one dwelling unit upon acceptance of a management plan for listed species, b. one dwelling unit for conveyance of fee simple title to a governmental agency, c. an early entry bonus for each TDR credit severed from sending lands from March 5, 2004 and for a period of five years after the LDC is amended to implement the early entry bonus, H:\2004\2004100\revisedDW041111.doc 1 Naples•Fort Myers•Venice d. miscellaneous provisions are also incorporated into the TDR provisions that the density bonuses are applicable to the North Belle Meade area, that TDR credits .-� which have been severed may be utilized for mitigation for any County, State or Federal permitting, and that conveyance bonus units shall not be available without a plan for management as authorized in the language set forth in Exhibit IV B attached which set forth the specific requirements for the proposed plan amendment. Potential Pitfalls of the TDR Program A consensus is emerging amongst various stakeholders (environmental groups, County staff, landowners, and developers)of the following potential pitfalls of the TDR Program: A. There needs to be additional incentives for stewardship of the land after TDR's are transferred from sending lands to receiving lands to better maintain conservation of said lands. The TDR Program does not currently include such a component. B. The result of leaving the current TDR formula in place or the ability to transfer one dwelling unit per five acres or legal nonconforming lot of record in existence on June 22, 1999 may result in sending lands developing out at their permitted underlying density as ranchettes at one dwelling unit per five acres or one dwelling unit per tax parcel or one dwelling unit per 40 acres, not unlike the development pattern emerging in Golden Gate Estates. Should this unintended consequence occur, protecting and conserving the most valuable environmental lands, including large connected wetland systems and significant areas of habitat for listed species could be jeopardized without the incorporation of additional incentives such as those proposed in this amendment. B. There is also a concern with those familiar with the availability of TDR's in the market place (little interest in landowners selling TDR's) that plans may never materialize for the Rural Villages in the Rural Mixed Use Area without readily available TDR's. Should the Rural Villages not materialize, less compact development patterns may result in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. This has the potential to contravene other goals and policies of the GMP. Allowing additional bonuses to landowners to be better stewards of the land will allow better compensation for lost development rights to landowners, lessening the potential for future challenges to the FLUE or Bert Harris claims while better insuring the availability of TDRs to implement the plan for Rural Villages. Potential Dwelling Units It is estimated there are +/-23,700 acres of Sending Lands and +/-22,294 acres of Receiving Lands in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. These acreage totals were provided by County staff. It is further estimated that there are currently +/-4,500 TDR units available to transfer from Sending Lands. Assuming each Development Right could be transferred at a ratio of 3-1, the (maximum bonus available under the proposed amendment) 9,000 additional dwelling units could theoretically be generated. The amendment does not propose to increase the Rural Fringe density limits of one unit per acre, or three units per acre in a Rural Village. H:\2004\20041001revisedDW041111.doc 2 Since it is difficult to assume what degree of interest there may be in the proposed TDR Plan Amendment program, several assumptions have been made in the attached Exhibit 13 to estimate the impacts of potential population increases on public facilities. These assumptions include the worst case scenario of 9,000 new dwelling units being created, 4,500 new dwelling units, and 2,250 new dwelling units. This will allow impacts on public facilities to be evaluated over several scenarios,the worst case being 9,000 new additional dwelling units. It should be noted that there are +/-93,000 acres in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use Area and it was assumed that the density for this area would build out at one dwelling unit per five acres or a density of+/-18,600 dwelling units, not including potential for uses available in Rural Villages. (Receiving lands are currently capped at one dwelling unit per acre outside Rural Villages, with a modest potential for additional density bonuses. The cap is not proposed to be increased.) Assuming the worst case scenario, or 9,000 new additional dwelling units, the gross density of the Rural Fringe Area would increase from .2 dwelling units per acre to +/-.3 dwelling units per acre over a relatively large geographic area. This area extends from north of Immokalee Road to the south of U.S. 41. (See attached Future Land Use Map depicting sending and receiving areas, Exhibit V.B.1.) To what extent the additional dwelling units allowed by the proposed Plan Amendment, should they materialize, be concentrated on which Receiving Lands is unknown making it problematic to precisely determine impacts on public facilities. At our pre-application meeting, it was noted by County staff that sewer and water facilities are likely sized to accommodate this potential for increased dwelling units and other support services existing or planned, may also be sufficient to accommodate this increased population growth. Further data can be provided upon request to demonstrate the availability of facilities and services ^ to support the potential for increased densities resulting from this plan amendment, but any such analysis should recognize the inherent limitations of estimating proposed density increases over such a large area. Also attached is an analysis that estimates the various utilization of development in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District both inside and outside of Rural Villages. The additional bonuses proposed in this plan amendment can be readily accommodated based on the attached utilization analysis. In fact, a case can be made that more dwelling units than allowed by the proposed plan amendment could also be accommodated within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use area, depending upon the extent that Rural Villages emerge within this area as an alternative to urban sprawl. The data and analysis prepared by County staff supporting FLUE Amendments and attendant policies for the adoption of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District is attached and some of this data and analysis is applicable to the proposed request. For example, the County's strategy for protecting vegetative communities is designed to function at the landscape scale and the project scale according to Page 1 of 2B of the attached data and analysis. The goal of protection at the landscape scale is to protect large systems by directing intense land uses away from these areas in order to maintain the systems as in tact as possible. The best way of accomplishing this, according to the attached data and analysis Page lof 2B, is to purchase the land by either fee purchase or to acquire the development rights in order to minimize the lands future development potential. The proposed Plan Amendment to provide further incentives to eliminate future development potential of Sending Lands is consistent with goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Element and the Conservation and Coastal Zone H:\2004\2004100\revisedD W041111.doc 3 Management Element designed to promote the conservation of national resources. Based on the distribution of total vegetation (wetland and upland) among the planning units in the Rural Fringe the highest concentration of vegetation was contained in NON-NRPA Sending and NRPA Sending Lands (85% and 99%) respectively, according to page 4 of 4 Vegetation Preservation of the attached data and analysis. These sending lands are the areas that could be eligible for the proposed density bonuses to maintain lands consistent with a listed species management plan, including but not limited to the removal of exotics and habitat management or by dedicating them to a governmental agency or program such as Conservation Collier. The Sending Lands both NON-NRPA Sending and NRPA Sending also had the greatest concentration of strategic Habitat (84% and 99%respectively for these lands according to page 6 of 6 of the attached data and analysis). Therefore, the adoption of the proposed amendment would further the goal of habitat preservation in both NON — NRPA Sending Lands and NRPA Sending Lands by creating further incentives to protect habitat for listed and endangered species and to further promote conservation of said lands. 2. Rural Villages Design Amendments The following changes are proposed to the design standards for Rural Villages: Section (IX) 3. Rural Villages *Deleted: be sufficient to Villages shall be designed to include the following: a mixture of residential housing types; institutional uses; commercial uses; and, recreational uses, all of which shall * serve the residents of the Village and the surrounding lands. Justification: This change is to clarify that 100%of the institutional, commercial and recreational uses will not be provided in the rural villages. One cannot reasonably expect the entire range of these elements to be required to be satisfied within the rural villages. Residents, no matter where they live, can be expected to have requirements that will not be met within their immediate environs: Regional Park uses are one such example. Section (IX)3. Rural Villages D)1.f) Deleted: 15 f) Civic Uses and Public Parks -Minimum of 10% of the total Village acreage. Justification: The planning book Time-Saver Standards for Housing and Residential Development and provides the following guidelines: Neighborhood Park— 1 to 2 Acres per 1000 persons Community Park—2 Acres per 1000 persons Large Park—5 Acres per 1000 persons For a project of say 475 acres at 3du/ac = 1425du x 2.03 persons per household = 2898 population = 2892/1000 =2.89 H:\2004\2004100\revised D W 041111.doc 4 Neighborhood Park—2.89 x 2ac. = 5.78 acres Community Park—2.89 x 2ac. = 5.78 acres Large Park—2.89 x Sac. = 14.45 acres Total Acres Parks =26 acres or +/-5%of the site That percentage was then doubled to 10% to ensure that Rural Villa.-es will have more parks than standard development, but not the excessive 15%that was called out originally. Section (IX)3. Rural Villages E)1. Deleted: 500 to 300 Deleted: 300 to 200 E) Open Space and Environmental Protection: 1. Greenbelts: In addition to the requirements for parks, village greens, and other open space within the Rural Village, a greenbelt averaging 300 feet in width but not less than 200 feet in width, shall be required at the perimeter of the Rural Village. Justification: This consensus was achieved at the County staff and Rural Fringe stakeholders meeting to provide for flexibility in project design and the more creative use of open space. Section (IX)3.C) 3. Density shall be achieved as follows: a) The base density for the Agricultural/Rural Designation of 0.2 dwelling units per acre (1.0) dwelling units per five acres) for lands within the Rural Village, and the land area designated as a green belt surrounding the Rural Village, is granted by right for allocation within the designated Rural Village. b) The additional density necessary to achieve the minimum required density for a Rural Village shall be achieved by an equal amount of TDRs Base Credits, Rural Village bBonus iUnits, and TDR Bonus Units. For each TDR Credit acquired for use in achieving the minimum density in a Rural Village,one Rural Village bBonus ttUnit shall be granted. c) Additional density between the minimum and maximum amounts established herein may be achieved through any of the following, either individually or in combination: 1) Additional Base and Bonus TDR Credits (excluding Rural Village Bonus Units). 2) A 0.5 unit bonus for each unit that is provided for lower income residents and for entry level and workforce buyers. 3) A density bonus of no more than 10% of the maximum density per acre allowed for each additional acre of native vegetation preserved exceeding the minimum preservation requirements set forth in Policy 6.1.2 of the CCME. 4) A density bonus of no more than 10% of the maximum density per acre as Justification: Proposed by County staff/outside legal counsel. H:\2004\2004100\revisedD W 041111.doc 5 11 Section (VI)G)1. Inserted: primary • Each Rural Village shall be served by a binary road system that is accessible by the public and shall not be gated. The primary road system within the village shall be designed to meet County standards and shall be dedicated to the public. Justification: This change recognizes the need for connectivity between the rural village and its context but also recognizes that certain roads may be private streets. The intent is that small neighborhood streets may be private where the main thoroughfares would be public roads. The minor streets may be designed to have narrower rights of way and have other design considerations that do not meet county public road standards. These design criteria changes would need to be approved through a PUD process where those criteria could be reviewed. Another justification is that certain roads may be dedicated to a CDD or HOA as part of the financing and community structure, and the maintenance that entity would provide would not be available. Section (VI)G)1. Inserted: • Access drives and alleys may not meet county standards. Justification: As mentioned in the justification above, certain types of streets may ask to deviate from county standards to support the more compact traditional neighborhood design contemplated for these rural villages. These would be reviewed for safety and other issues through a PUD process. Section (IX) l L North Belle Meade Overlay Receiving Areas The standards for the Rural Villages in the NBM Overlay Receiving Area shall be generally the same as provided for in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District,. However,because of the NBM Receiving Area's location adjacent to Estates, the NBM NRPA, and other Sending Lands, it does not have access to existing commercial uses,which should be encouraged on NBM Receiving Lands. The following exceptions shall apply: The minimum gross density shall be 1.5 dwelling units per gross acre and a maximum of 3 units per gross acre. A minimum of 0.5 dwelling units per acre shall be acquired through the Base and Bonus TDR Credits. Justification: Proposed by County staff/outside legal counsel. H:\2004\2004100\revisedDW041111.doc 6 In closing,we trust you will find this amendment worthy of your support in furtherance of the goals, objectives and policies of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District and the Conservation and Coastal Zone Management Element. We further understand you had some concerns pertaining to how to implement the maintenance/exotic removal provisions of the proposed plan amendment at our pre- application meeting. We look forward to working with you on implementing Land Development Regulations where details can be further refined. Sincerely, HOLE MONTES,INC. ii)U4#440 Robert L. Duane, A.I.C.P. Planning Director RLD:nbj Cc: David Ellis Bruce Anderson Nancy Payton Brad Cornell Thomas W. Reese Tom Taylor n RLD:nbj H:\2004\2004100\revisedD W 04l 111.doc 7 EXHIBIT IV B (IX)C) Sending Lands: Sending Lands are those lands that have the highest degree of environmental value and sensitivity and generally include significant wetlands, uplands, and habitat for listed species. 1. Sending Lands are located entirely within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and are depicted on the Future Land Use Map. Based upon their location, Sending Lands are the principal target for preservation and conservation. Private Property owners of lands designated as Sending Lands may transfer density to Receiving Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and to lands within the Urban Designated Area subject to limitations set forth in the Density Rating System. All privately owned lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District that have a Natural Resource Protection Area(NRPA) Overlay are designated Sending Lands. 2. Maximum Base Transfer Severance Rate: Development rights may be wed severed from Sending Lands at a maximum rate of 0.2 dwelling-units TDR Credits per acre (1 TDR Credit per five acres). Transfer-6 Utilization of TDR Credits in Receiving Lands may only occur in whole number increments (fractional transfers fractions are prohibited). In the case of legal nonconforming lots or parcels in existence as of June 22, 1999, where such lot or parcel is less than 5 acres in size, one dwelling-unit TDR Credit may be tr-ansfeed severed from said lot or parcel. To ensurc e•-•• suelit-pFepefties-te4he-urban-afea 3. Conditions Applicable to Base and Bonus TDR Credits: a) Transfers shall not be allowed Base TDR Credits may not be severed from sSending ILands where a conservation easement or other similar development restriction prohibits residential development. b) The transfer severance of writs credits shall be recorded in public records utilizing a legal instrument determined to be appropriate by the County Attorney's Office. Said instrument shall clearly state the remaining allowable lands uses on the subject property after all, or a portion, of the residential density has been wed from the property. c) Where development rights have been teed severed from Sending Lands, such lands may be retained in private ownership or may be sold or deeded by gift to another entity. d) The bonus provisions set forth in subsections 4 through 6 below are applicable to properties from which TDR Credits were severed prior to the effective date of this amendment. e) These bonus provisions set forth in subsections 4 through 6 below are also applicable to the North Belle Meade Overlay provisions of the provisions of the Future Land Use Element. f) Any Sending Lands from which TDR Credits have been severed may also be utilized for mitigation programs and associated mitigation activities and uses in conjunction with any County, State or Federal permitting. g) No Conveyance Bonus Units shall be available without provision of a plan for management and maintenance as authorized in subsection 4 below (the Maintenance H:\2004\2004100\Exhibit IV B TDR REVISIONS Blended.doc 1 Bonus). 4. Environmental Restoration and Maintenance TDR Bonus: One (1) additional TDR Bonus Credit may be issued to the owner of each five acre parcel or legal nonconforming lot of record. This bonus shall be granted upon the County's acceptance of a Restoration and perpetual Management Endowment Plan (RPMEP) that is consistent with a listed species management plan that includes habitat management, the removal of exotics, and the maintenance of the land exotic free, in perpetuity. The property owner may contract with any of the government agencies or contractors deemed qualified by the County for implementation of the RPMEP. 5. Conveyance TDR Bonus: A TDR Bonus may be issued to the owner of each five (5) acre parcel or legal nonconforming lot of record designated as Sending Lands, at the transfer rate of one (1) additional TDR Unit for each five acres or legal nonconforming lot of record for conveyance of fee simple title to a governmental agency. 6. Early Entry TDR Bonus: An Early Entry TDR Bonus shall be available in the form of an additional one TDR Credit for each Base TDR Credit severed from Sending Lands from March 5, 2004, and for a period of five years after the adoption of the LDC implemented this provision. Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits may be used after the termination of the bonus period. n 74. Permitted Uses: Permitted uses are limited to the following: a) Agricultural uses consistent with Chapter 823.14(6)Florida Statutes (Florida Right to Farm Act) ***(Continued Text) VIII H:\2004\2004100\Exhibit IV B TDR REVISIONS Blended.doc 2 (IX) 3.Rural Villages: Rural Villages may be approved within the boundaries of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District in order to: maximize the preservation of natural areas and wildlife habitat within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District; to reduce the need for residents of the District and surrounding lands to travel to the County's Urban area for work, recreation, shopping, and education; and, to enhance the provision of limited urban and rural levels of service through economies of scale. Rural Villages shall be comprised of several neighborhoods designed in a compact nature such that a majority of residential development is within one quarter mile of Neighborhood Centers. Neighborhood Centers may include small scale service retail and office uses, and shall include a public park, square, or green. Village Centers shall be designed to serve the retail, office, civic, government uses and service needs of the residents of the village. The Village Center shall be the primary location for commercial uses. Villages shall be surrounded by a green belt in order to protect the character of the rural landscape and to provide separation between villages and the low density rural development, agricultural uses, and conservation lands that may surround the village. Villages shall be designed to include the following: a mixture of residential housing types; institutional uses; commercial uses; and, recreational uses, all of which shall be sufficient to serve the residents of the Village and the surrounding lands. In addition, the following criteria and conditions shall apply, except for those modifications that are identified in the North Belle Meade Overlay: A) Process for Approval: Within one year of the date of adoption of this amendment, the Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended to include provisions for the establishment of Rural Villages. These provisions will establish specific development regulations, standards, and land use mix requirements. Subsequent to the creation of these provisions, applications shall be submitted in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezone and, where applicable, in conjunction with a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) application as provided for in Chapter 380 of Florida Statutes, or in conjunction with any other Florida provisions of law that may supercede the DRI process. B) Locational Restrictions: 1. A Rural Village shall not be located any closer than 3.0 miles from another Rural Village. 2. No more than one Rural Village may be located in each of the distinct Receiving Areas depicted on the FLUM. 3. A Rural Village shall have direct access to a roadway classified by Collier County as an arterial or collector roadway. Alternatively, access to the Village may be via a new collector roadway directly accessing an existing arterial, the cost of which shall be borne entirely by the developer. 4. A Rural Village shall be located where other public infrastructure, such as potable water and sewer facilities, already exist or are planned. C) Rural Village Sizes and Density: 1. Rural Villages shall be a minimum of 300 acres and a maximum of 1,500 acres, except within Receiving Lands south of the Belle Meade NRPA where the maximum size may not exceed 2,500 acres. The Rural Village size is exclusive of the required green belt area. Rural Villages shall include a Village Center and a minimum of two distinct neighborhoods. H:\2004\2004100\Exhibit IV B TDR REVISIONS Blended.doc 3 - i • 2. The minimum and maximum gross density of a Rural Village shall be 2.0 units per gross acre and 3.0 units per acre, respectively. The density calculation for a Rural Village may include the base residential density permitted for the green belt area, if such density is shifted to the Rural Village area. 3. Density may be achieved as follows: a) The base density for the Agricultural Rural Designation of 0.2 dwelling units per acre(1.0 dwelling units per five acres) for lands within the Rural Village, and the land area designated as a greenbelt surrounding the Rural Village, is granted by right for allocation within the designated Rural Village. b) The additional density necessary to achieve the minimum required density for a Rural Village shall be achieved by an equal amount of TDRs Base Credits, Rural hBonus *Units, and TDR Bonus Units. For each TDR Credit acquired for use in achieving the minimum density in Rural Village, one Rural Village hBonus *Unit shall be granted. c) Additional density between the minimum and maximum amounts established herein may be achieved through any of the following, either individually or in combination: 1) Additional Base and Bonus TDR Credits (excluding Rural Village Bonus Units). 2) A 0.5 unit bonus for each unit that is provided for lower income residents and for entry level and workforce buyers, and/or through a density bonus of no more than 10% of the maximum density per acre allowed for each additional acre of native vegetation preserved exceeding the minimum preservation requirements set forth in Policy 6.1.2 of the CCME. Within one (1) year of the effective date of these Rural Fringe amendments, the County will amend the land development code to establish the following: a definition of "workforce housing:"minimum qualifications for the above referenced density bonus; and, a minimum percent of the allowable density that shall meet the definition of workforce/affordable housing within a rural village. D) Land Use Mix: 1. Acreage Limitations a) Neighborhood Center - 0.5% of the total Village acreage, not to exceed 10 acres,within each Neighborhood Center. b) Neighborhood Center Commercial —Not to exceed 40% of the Neighborhood Center acreage and 8,500 square feet of gross leasable floor area per acre. c) Village Center-Not to exceed 10%of the total Village acreage. d) Village Center Commercial -Not to exceed 30% of the Village Center acreage and 10,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area per acre. e) Research and Technology Parks — Consistent with the provisions of the Research and Technology Park Subdistrict in the Urban Mixed Use District, excluding paragraph j; the Park shall not exceed 4% of the total Village acreage. H:\2004\2004100\Exhibit IV B TDR REVISIONS Blended.doc 4 f) Civic Uses and Public Parks - Minimum of 15% 10% of the total Village acreage. E) Open Space and Environmental Protection: 1. Greenbelts: In addition to the requirements for parks, village greens, and other open space within the Rural Village, a greenbelt averaging 300 300 feet in width but not less than 300 200 feet in width, shall be required at the perimeter of the Rural Village. The Greenbelt is required to ensure a permanent un-developable edge surrounding the Rural Village, thereby discouraging sprawl. Greenbelts shall only be designated on Receiving Lands. The allowable residential density shall be shifted from the designated Greenbelt to the Rural Village. The greenbelt may be concentrated to a greater degree in areas where it is necessary to protect listed species habitat, including wetlands and uplands, provide for a buffer from adjacent natural reservations, or provide for wellfield or aquifer protection, Golf courses and existing agriculture operations are permitted within the greenbelt, subject to the native vegetation preservation requirements specified below in paragraph 2. However, golf course turf areas shall only be located within 100 feet of the Greenbelt boundaries (interior and exterior boundary); further, these turf areas shall only be located in previously cleared, or disturbed areas (see CCME Policy 6.1.2(1)). 2. Open Space and Native Vegetation Retention. a) Native Vegetation shall be preserved as set forth in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 6.1.2. b) Open Space: Within the Rural Village and required Greenbelt, in aggregate, a minimum of 40%of Open Space shall be provided. 3. An environmental impact statement for the Rural Village and surrounding greenbelt area shall be submitted an accordance with Policy 6.1.7 of the CCME. F) Fiscal Neutrality: A Rural Village may only be approved after demonstration that the Village will be fiscally neutral to county taxpayers outside of the Village. 1. An analysis shall be conducted and submitted in conjunction with the PUD rezone and/or DRI application evaluating the demand and impacts on levels of service for public facilities and the cost of such facilities and services necessary to serve the Rural Village. This evaluation shall identify projected revenue sources for services and any capital improvements that may be necessary to support the Village. Additionally, this analysis shall demonstrate that the costs of providing necessary facilities and services shall be fiscally neutral to County taxpayers outside of the Village. At a minimum, the analysis shall consider the following: a) Stormwater/drainage facilities; b) Potable water provisions and facilities; c) Reuse or"Grey"water provisions for irrigation; d) Central sewer provisions and facilities; e) Park facilities; f) Law enforcement facilities; g) School facilities; h) Roads, transit,bicycle and pedestrian facilities and pathways; H:\2004\2004100\Exhibit IV B TDR REVISIONS Blended.doc 5 i) Solid Waste facilities. (V) Development phasing and funding mechanisms to address any impacts to level of service in accordance with the County's adopted concurrency management program. Accordingly, there shall be no degradation to the adopted level of service for public facilities and infrastructure identified above. G) As part of the development of Rural Village provisions, land development regulations shall identify specific design and development standards for residential, commercial and other uses. These standards shall protect and promote a Rural Village character_and shall include requirements for parks, greens, squares, and other public places. In addition to the public spaces required as a part of a Village Center or_Neighborhood Center. Rural Villages shall incorporate a Village Park and neighborhood parks. In addition, the following shall be addressed: 1. Rural Village, Village Center and neighborhood design guidelines and development standards: • A formal street layout, using primarily a grid design and incorporating village greens, squares and civic uses as focal points. • Neighborhoods and the village center will be connected through local and collector streets and shall incorporate traffic calming techniques as may be appropriate to discourage high-speed traffic. • Consideration shall be given to the location of public transit and school bus stops. • Pedestrian paths and bikeways shall be designed so as to provide access and interconnectivity. • The siting of both schools and housing units within the village shall consider the minimization of busing needs within the community. • Each Rural Village shall be served by a binary road system that is accessible by the public and shall not be gated. The primary road system within the village shall be designed to meet County standards and shall be dedicated to the public. Access drives and alleys may not meet county standards. A Rural Village shall not be split by an arterial roadway. • Interconnection between the Rural Village and adjacent developments shall be encouraged. 2. Specific allocations for land uses including residential, commercial and other non- residential uses within Rural Villages, shall include,but are not limited to: • A mixture of housing types, including single-family attached and detached, as well as multi-family. Housing that is provided for lower income residents and for entry level and workforce buyers shall receive a credit of 0.5 units for each unit constructed. Collier County shall develop, as part of the Rural Village Overlay, a methodology for determining the rental and fee-simple market rates that will qualify for such a credit, and a system for tracking such credits. • A mixture of recreational uses, including parks and village greens. • Civic, community, and other institutional uses. H:\2004\2004100\Exhibit IV B TDR REVISIONS Blended.doc 6 • li n A mixture of lot sizes, with a design that includes more compact development and attached dwelling units within neighborhood centers and the Village Center, and reduced net densities and increasingly larger lot sizes for detached residential dwellings generally occurring as development extends outward from the Village Centers. ■ A mixture of retail, office, and services uses. c) Specific development standards, including but not limited to,maximum net densities; required yards; landscaping and buffering, and building heights. V.B. North Belle Mead Overlay Receiving Areas l) 1. North Belle Meade Rural Village The standards for the Rural Villages in the NBM Overlay Receiving Area shall be generally the same as provided for in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District_ However, because of the NBM Receiving Area's location adjacent to Estates,the NBM NRPA, and other Sending Lands, it does not have access to existing commercial uses,which should be encouraged on NBM Receiving Lands. The following exceptions shall apply: The minimum gross density shall be 1.5 dwelling units per gross acre and a maximum of 3 units per gross acre. 2) A minimum of 0.5 dwelling units per acre shall be acquired through the Base and/or Bonus TDR Credits. 454353_2 H:\2004\2004100\Exhibit IV B TDR REVISIONS Blended.doc 7 • APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER CP-2004-4 DATE RECEIVED 4-23-04 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE April 9, 2004 DATE SUFFICIENT This application,with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 941-403-2300(Fax 941-643-6968). The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 (attached). If you have any questions,please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 941- 403-2300. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION Al Name of Applicant David Ellis Company CBIA (Collier Building Industry Association) Address 4779 Enterprise Avenue City Naples State FL Zip Code 34104 Phone Number 239-436-6100 Fax Number 239-436-3878 A2 Name Nancy Payton (contact person) Applicant Florida Wildlife Federation Address 2590 Golden Gate Parkway#109 City Naples State FL Zip Code 34105 Phone Number 239-643-4111 ext 14 Fax Number A3 Name Bradley Cornell (contact person) Applicant Collier County Audubon Society Address 660 9th Street North City Naples State FL Zip Code 34102 Phone Number 239-643-7822 Fax Number H:\2004\2004100\AMEND GMP.doc 1 B1 Name of Agent* Robert L. Duane *THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Hole Montes, Inc Address 950 Encore Way City Naples State FL Zip Code 34110 Phone Number 239-254-2000 Fax Number 239-254-2099 B2 Name of Agent* Bruce Anderson, Esq. *THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Roetzel & Andress Address 850 Park Shore Drive, Trianon Center, 3rd Floor City Naples State FL Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-649-2708 Fax Number 239-261-3659 B3 Name of Agent* Thomas W. Reese, Esq. *THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Address 2951 61st Ave. South city St. Petersburg State FL Zip Code 33712 Phone Number 727 867-8228 Fax Number C. Name of Owner(s)of Record N/A Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number D. Name,Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. Robert L. Duane AICP was principal author of this document. Support documentation was also provided by Tim Hancock AICP. H:\2004\2004100WMEND GMP.doc 2 II. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION - Collier County Audubon Society, Inc. A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, lost all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address, Office Percentage of Stock See attached board list for Collier None have any Audubon Society financial interest in this application. C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE,with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries,or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Date of Contract: H:\2004\2004100\AMEND GMP.doc 3 n II. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION - Florida Wildlife Federation A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, lost all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership N/A B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address, Office Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest N/A D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership N/A E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation,Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership N/A Date of Contract: H:\2004\2004100\AMEND GMP.doc 4 F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership G. Date subject property acquired ( )leased ( ): Term of lease yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option Terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf,to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION NA B. GENERAL LOCATION Sending and Receiving Lands as depicted on the FLUE C. PLANNING COMMUNITY Corkscrew, Rural Estates, Royal Fakapalm D.TAZ E. SIZE IN ACRES ±46.000 F. ZONING Predominantly AG with some PUDs G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN Predominantly vacant with some s.f. homes H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION Agriculture Rural, Mixed Use, Sub District Receiving, NRPA& Primary Sending IV. TYPE OF REQUEST A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT(S)TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Recreation/Open Space Traffic Circulation Sub-Element Mass Transit Sub-Element Aviation Sub-Element Potable Water Sub-Element Sanitary Sewer Sub-element NGWAR Sub-Element Solid Waste Sub-Element Drainage Sub-Element Capital Improvement Element CCME Element X Future Land Use Element Golden Gate Master Plan Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE(S) 64,65,69 OF THE FLUE ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Useless-throng ►s to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Exhibit IV B H:\2004\2004100WMEND GMP.doc 5 and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 1. N/A Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). 2. N/A Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) 3. N/A Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable 4. N/A Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable 5. N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher)surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). 6. Exhibit V.F.6 Estimated Build-out of.Receiving Areas G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 1. Attached $16,700 non-refundable filing fee, plus$30/acre for each affected acre for Future Land Use map amendments, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. 2. N/A $9,000 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. 3. X Legal Advertisement Costs (your portion determined by number of petitions). 4. N/A Proof of ownership (Copy of deed) 5. Exhibit V. G. 4 Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner(See attached form) Attached 1 Original and 5 complete,signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal.After sufficiency is completed,25 copies of the complete application will be required. n *Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1"=400'or at a scale as determined during the pre-application meeting. EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit IV.B PROPOSED AMENDMENT (Proposed Text Change) Exhibit IV E PUBLIC FACILITIES Analysis of potential impacts contained in response letter and exhibits 1-12 attached thereto Exhibit 13 Category A Public Facilities Analysis Exhibit V B 1 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION Two Future Land Use Maps are attached (24"x36"and 8 1/2"X 11") Exhibit V C 1-2 Rural Fringe Area Assessment,Vegetation Preservation, March 4, 2002 Exhibit V.F.6 Estimated Utilization Levels of Receiving Areas, Tim Hancock, April 19, 2004 Exhibit V.G.4 Notarized authorization (3) Exhibit 1 Table B-1 from the 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update Exhibit 2 Location map, depicting existing community, regional and some neighborhood parks Exhibit 3 Inventory of vacant park sites Exhibit 4 NO EXHIBIT 4 Exhibit 5 NO EXHIBIT 5 Exhibit 6 Excerpts from the 2003 Waste Water Master Plan Update Final Report dated 5/25/04 Exhibit 7 Excerpts from the 2003 Water Master Plan Update Final Report dated 5/25/04 Exhibit 8 Sewer Service Area Map Exhibit 9 Future Water Service Areas Exhibit 10 Map of Existing and Planned Roadways from the GMP Exhibit 11 NO EXHIBIT 11 Exhibit 12 NO EXHIBIT 12 P••• Exhibit 14 Table 5-5 Population and Water Demand Projection: Rural Fringe Area H:\2004\2004100\AMEND GMP.doc 8 7. 48S I T 47 8 1 1 48 8 I T49S 1 T50S I T51S I T 52 8 I T53 S P `q o o .8 a •< i, i SG § 5 ALNfO3 oaVMoae uNnoo Sava e 0g a Q 01 7 �e 3 € `i i F-1 i y B r o 9 i i igolotgi PP W BI i < q pt. gg 3 e s L E$4 f Ip. r+"` H 4 p W I de,, ¥ 1€s z s li s .1 ° g ' W 3 ' ill! �, R 6 w. .Sa . • = 1. Ld 3 d w a s ' a E1W g 33g s i o I ssg 8 o �, rc � a a.ag,8y .. ai t ;y o v 4 CA4 §3 ¢ j li e� S10: Y $ S 14 z 101•D NW ❑=m Hog I ❑•E: 1e° 5 o E I. �� 3. p w Ior_'lgypds Z§ paW, 4 K yy 5 f+f eN .� !!014 W R�C3 T O W 2 `g3 U Q M i N g d li d . E @s " W3<d p d m 'k' g 4§h I of Fg. d Yy giDs0. I€ S ; S. 4 ' = e 32$0w iFa17' sS41 4',06,4 " s� ' w_ E Fo' gos a<s ¢ §100%\ a2gsag ❑■■M■ eIgiSliiii Or o : Irli / .1CC 6 a4 Irs f / Fc v o aN R i q ¢ z x 101111 �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl Millr — . co I111111) Irl ) A I ^g "hi,—N �_ l " `a" ..' r. 1111111111111" g N¢ X111111111Ul :'':. 4''',_,:i./— W ”r 14 r,111,10k �y./ I. .b, N 1. . 0 t i , 3 p i ,!,' - . plik,"3W4 Il LLI w � g La N = p imatef g l_Nt i a'6 z - y E `a 8 s $ R 8 3` '" �\ c f. � 4 . gr e m a ` 1aF. S 0TmaIa -119T9e i, �� Mex c� 0I : 2 1 6 .. 3 .. s . ,g gag 1 ,,1 g I J k it Gulf o ! @9e 1Q11aa11i11111&Bla '- 1a g_ 41 44 / 4444444 4 } ., 4 VW 1 e S 94 1 S L4 1 I S 94 1 S 04 1 I S O9 1 9 l9 1 S 29 1 S CS 1 • 1 • N I • p.c.? m; � 5o °e • 0 cd w240 � 0 I- Sy � 4' t y vQi"'O w `2 td :� �" ed O O 'E). >,'b O Q 'r ,.� fi � o Q" : Of) p O rte aj+, o... iii Q1 nn ° ^ >c 4� a) ° 5 0V w ca .r I... ai d w cn oo O 'S U C N 4bUA. c4 p .wo . .. o , acb 0o • � ° •5 g ' Nom . 0 .O , .5 ° rn 5t Q .% .4 am •4r aUes .. .p E O O O w Q .� . Q ba c°, y o a Alt v o y ❑ y co a 4,4 O Q. .9 4r • " .2 . O O 0▪ V � v, N• Q CH -0o0 � � chaa w .52 ig, allo.� aoo . ~ , > a' .,0c / N N C cc) o 'b .10U cjQe] ey p o vvO w . O q 2 y Gda .dO a) w) cM .,?. O bz,C 41 g N .d - ty > � ~ avop ..0 .. [-- co ,N • ..z 4:2, a 4 i " a) , 0Oa „ dS� „ . d 'ti O � � a) �+ ; yaA a .2). -0 o. Q 44$ ..o O C w � '” u,-. a) ri o ny oiTs � o .a 0 cv .c aa � • bN ) ▪ O nOG .fi�� O • L n t� O y V te . .� w ° 1 p o p o •+ a) b ••S o 0 �'].•.0 0, o c�a p 0 ti. 0 co tu > � "O bA.. U ) a) as ai to O y L ,O b +•-, b .,. n 4 co UrEti° a) ett OU) 0 Q .t0 cd fn CdO '� 5 •Ocv 'w a) „ � ..b . a) .,,, ..'� >, w cc; • G. p. ;; O O •C N O p 0 O M CCdM.d O. O O1. .el O w • b0 .. .0 a al 0 ed V 2 z 0442b t gb Q .. y :~ .fib o o „�, ami y ao En '.. E g a) 0 {4 a 8 U0 " o 5 0 U) ai •ce O. Oa) 0Eocd, a) "C▪ a)• o > O ro O'Zt O -. ° �' CC ' , •''" i 'O 0 > U ... v yA •5 .bQ "i >, a a . ° . Iti W .. � a) 04ca) 8 > 6. v � � owQ � S m wC7 0a > C • . U0O O •3 w r.,., larna) yd p O C v . > 2 E 4 E 0.1 COaio v o ° v o aCO .? • °E CO . , . a) c) a) o cd > It � y y ec‘owa) Q" 4444. mb ~ ..• >' « Cd el w N "0 = 04 ,h 400 'o C2 v'1%6 W °▪ C7 16, 73 •., • ° 0.) rn E 0 cd .. >' O . 4. 0 , 'CU CU 0 L'" ,Oy °.° '' Cd _ ...�, .. v� U a) 16, ' •p `' .. ..°. 0 > id as Z t". •O' `) y .a 'L7 0 •—. � 0 0 -0 cd.. •••••—;', Ur `_ C cd O o 8 0 a) U pj .. y O ct • a, 4. 4 tt es• •U Zw 1 ° c" 0 ,8 0 .? °tf, u O .. a0 0 c y' "0 '',,°.. c) 0 °4 .: W a . Z? o ▪ o `' a ' i co :° 4 OA y c p . .0 , • • •a 0 Q Qcu0o Q . ° ap ° .. ° - 'I"".. t .ta,' ° E CO• ° VV0 ` 8 •L. E-4 0. > o " Q cr Q no > o U U E"' d 0 • o cu 7 "., c4 lt, 3174 MQ :d > O py.U° r -Ly -0 y0 0 a) .0 a) O M s ° ¢ , E O ca ,. -d a7 •eti M ''. lg 7° 0 � o oe 0cd m CU g cco G ' OA a)U N1• o ° a) cn 2 , 0 - = oq aO 'a > Z > vw > y ° = > co a CL) w ,.o . 0 q an q r car ,, OO ° ° ° io w e. • tt . v is = g w ` F" 1") 5 P = 0 p 0 o U } , b w as 'b U «t ,� >, o vi ., • aa)) Z c , y " cu t L O . co a > .O o b m cci O, > U .A) ,r t .w,y y H ° rn Rt ^-. U ..-• co y 3 w y Q 'd ,� OD cd 59 0 .^ b 0.d >>, a) 0 ..,5,, n ° 4.) > «s p'' � .� > d *— as 0 ami• •= ° v ':,m y., w ° 0 t~ ,..=N cd 0 c0 cv > O U .�..c CU 0 ) a y w 3 .0 .d ° • 0 > a 1115 rd O 0 4.) �vN O > � ° •• bb .gib 4.1,) .4 � ifl 0.0° Ei O O c a —,CZ En /"'No E a) w oa c o a° i o C° a"O ° N . Oo.,•— • a0a "4:4 , 0 N0, oo... Oy `) v v _) w M b v C pti m 0 ° NC eoCt ., ° ; 3 w3 CU " ..ri03b a Q ': ° ' � U „st O- i +. v 7 p Qcdoh aO �� 'O .° b 0. O �� Oye . ° -w - _ •� .., � v Cy , >,w c ° at r-1 � Gn tl ° fn . • ° ° cd w i•; co ° 00 Wle > ° `u , a.' o ° y O a . a stcn > — vv co 0 — • co b ° ect O b a) a) 0 O > r U 010 - 0 › cu c° i = E a) Oq .: d ° av) Q , V ° c.0 ill aataw ca . cocC CU C0 L3 O r° ° COc� F +, , a ° >a) v) > q 'al O i . ° Ob w aca 0 O p d i •ti ° ed 3 y° ° q > ° .� M•9., + ° > 15 .000 () U rn U CU c_, 'G 6. °s. 4. 30 0 3x oq.� +r > 3 -Ls n ° a •vvi , 0 G w ›. ° ° 4,...))� oa � '3 •' �OoN � d ° = �" • - N o oo ci y •a]w ° U esco o y oo wa) )h U > ° cn > c'" °Q) A.) 2 - 'to ! U o E E ° ° w w a) • -o a) E oo • 'v5 co "� O Q a) a., i E O w is a › 3 a) ° n •� t O ) 5 w � b .. cn C ° ' - m00 « ° •V ,Q -D ° ° w2 ,� v) . • ai ,4 a) . CC00 MI0V N ° '41.) ad)2 —1 *g i ' ..' '''' ''.° Et 0 a, •,:;,, o .� ° 3 � My 0 ° ° ani ° ° o ° ° ° 0 > a) .a w ~ ..c7 a) 'b • ' o: tl °p PV) is; U a y • o ° d ° > ' ^ O '—' ° E .Nsia ccs -d v) .4 . FO r=4 4L.,) O ccs 0 L)Mca O O N ° S~ (Z4 bA ce co t~ .. w ° O rn o ° - ° c °'� w • a) , /"1r tz a ,L21 � - Qoff p. � o � " C j ° . d � . o, o A /"....\ i'..t, •M ii3 , 1 • T 50 S T 51 S lift) ,E ....., c0 CV ' 11 r HI 144t I Til 1 III I 11 PH I/ 111 CC E t i 1' i , , 1 1 1 te L'n ',' ''....‘ .:,,ft., A..) IV:" ; Nonni , ' id Hi iliul mill .. 11111111.11111F ' I' 1 1 ‘.$,,u ...gz '1-1•4'1-1-- -- 11111111110111111111111111111111iNir t!---- .44%. ,..p.44 '4,... s..-• in: • g 1 1 i I I —, Pa• '1•4 ., alum 1, ,,,___,.._ ...1 0:-I 0 ' .... , . ,.. , .Ya.. ,L1Z13.su ,,,644.,, 4.• !....l : . .- : . . s-, 4.1. 4 .- r ‘, MI • • w IFIM-11 IMW11. i.A.—)H, (,!.. a , ! • 0 CSI C.) Iid ,1 \I •1, , , MI , ,....., -4t co a) s. 0 ....ri . ''...I 1r Cn "...1 • CU.--, Cn i a) Tict i.„. w , Z 0) U... sa, ...,eV i 1 8 .. 4 7; '—J iiii CD 1 esi = i rl la' Ct cL2 . .,. Jo v. to '8...., W-t ' Setol te) te) .to) tai -Ca t14 '•we ..0 t.1 "41 :41 /461 w 1 T47S .;i Jr T45S 1 I .. T49S A . T5OS I T 51 S 1.4 gi . . .... ..... iv ' . -...z I,................ .....,.............. .............. . . . ... . . . . , . . . : .. - . ' :.••.: ' ,,;:.!: I. . 1..... ...._it . . .. . . . . . . . ...... ...,. . : . . : . .: . . .. • .. . ....... ........if....--.E.„77,.........„.....;......„ ................. • . . . . . . . .. .. .. .... . . . . . .... . .. .. . • , • . . . . . . • , i.P. .:'!...`;. -4-- .......,.... ........ . . -• :i.:-. I.•:• - ' ': • w • •-•• . c.1 .....,.... . . .. ..,-: -. •• - • •• re = x . . 1 ' '' • IN. 00 C.i.-.2::::::•-•:•..:..................... ,0 .............., ........,......... .... somo •t 0 . ...... • - ........................ ....... .... .._. . . , , ,•-,... 10).1 V 0 w 0 G.) = ., .... . ...... . •. • . . .................... , w • o R I Cit Cft) =I CO i E# ****6 00 a w c : D) . : ...„ -[2 C 100 : 0) .,.., z CZ 0 •— CD 0 2. 4., 0 --., 4) = . • . . ..' -„J 4.) 1 oi > cp C CD 4." -a' ....._.. . . i cs) ci) a) -- ,..cc; •—> TA .-c. t-4 --- ' 0 0D I .— 4 CV r.7.4 = I 1," (1) 0 a) a) a) CO -0 11 (air I El:,z . V 1 CO i At WO 4 •- '-ct 5 , ,,,, I . . .... — 5 (1) ,,,, :. , C.) 6) 2 u) : ,A ...4.4 .s. 1....1 t-. C4 CT i CC .-C-' ii, -. :, ' , c....) • u- CC 74-' ae ,..•••N t ti c.k,, .,.., j . gi 1J-4 I SLV1 I SeV1 i S641 i S091 i 124 1:4 co, t m I — N N' 0.) ? e — o _ 0)e CO w N O •'> a c ,� CO tt A N > L �/ V •� .0 Q,P QIC CD10.4 z " G4 ;o ci):r iv o,= dtiet N� n t Z co o)0.... iy C z C a co 1 0 C N i� �`°4, e=a •C�, ,L 15C C = i �� CO 0 G, j a) Q N �'c U 8,d .....9.. V �6to ti �i� < N •'1, i-. z 0 add, a CO N 4 G" 0 tgn •0 d• 00 tt a . w 1 47 T46S T49S T50S I T51S m g w M cc N A 3+ A It.. y Ne ii 'is, z111141 .F ti • I. a....Al 41 illq:17" {{1111 'J i� (n G �N w ta) .Ln 1 1 a tO '.. N O o ttt —.� W O 'j ;y • m cI an -' 1, V a -d x o' 4) 47...1V .a C .d ; U cz= c ct 10 U U t'' q w c4 v) cn n � � sg I SL41 I 5941 IS641 I SO51 E elm A� — C o I m ti � C N z _ �a 14.1 00 > N 7 G ro *et Ok. O m �H A_ o 2� '� > ,. = Lg , , •� aS hit 4: _ i {p co i I.+ _ •� i ' C CD c, Q C Go Z 0 MI S O' o 1q ti CU 5 ��Sr °ti 4, 09 3 d 0 0 N ,�i,, I— a4� a) i _ ` E co o 0 4 y o c o ca d � U 4 a a7 0- as cle• �� V Z •I h con O M411, V CD �1c O > d• w W T47S 5 T49S II T503 I T51S 4 T46 R W I m ,, .; ‘1111 R '. * tea _,' s»� i • CI Nhi e Ad K ..., .- . . mi-i :-.3.;,...iir 1. � • w W • l96 N� c �,>C W 4y .� o U cC a) 0 ct 'ZS) V 0.0 a� e78 a� c ----� o-0 > ori J o ( Q N o w T 'N `I�l �1 _ N -� 0 C , L• a.) �G 1 I SL41 _ALL S841 S641 SOSl 38 co N �e CD w oo c n — CO co o G c,.+ y 'a o m '►N la Of Q Li i Z :aE. 0, 141 tx - a _ o d� t41 iftl 1.0 O Ga O a� ________V e 'az CtS LC) Ch , ' ./..•C13 *CD ' 4 Lia 3 C • G,l .F., , I t/) t - C o I S ,— id^ t '. ��i Z � O1 p yra 0w In 0 bio O col �' b I 441 til I e .�. I T4.7 T4$ 1I `+HiF. I TS F 57's> L. L2 a n Tr vii C - '1"' ,-;'.1;' W1.0f14,4:'=1;,11..`;4' '1 ki,40'''' , L.. tom' l*Itt n I t tl 4.4 V y. fat: ' Ott A' c `y.. ate+ �" ? tf) v- r4i I� Q e.`, w «t—i 'Lr vii a4 b=' c QZ A w ..4 • ,"".� Z � Rry ami 0 G) b e OD N •tt .4, w • M :.fl •> o = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tt ,N .. bct' W x ,.,,, V V. N N O h N O vi p0' v ,;; U c eo ,O .� 04 .a i M 7 0 E E-� .o c4 0�; O 0 Cl) en O1 N N ' 00 O WI .' ami o cC "tl b 'L". 44) r4 � U N vs N 01 01 7 ,-., - 0 O 7., `'" - > ani o > < -- N N Coi Co ry� c - .ti c V) 'O '' N .0 p at O p C a0) O by o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Opp:• a) UgU ¢ > a 7 Vo v o et o 4) � oi °` �i o v; N c c w a) a= •�,, to c4 o 4' 0 w as 0, as es 0 v) 'p kr) N N 00 'b ,..0 V p 6.; c0: v, E" Q "" N M 7 00 ^.Ni •'k G 'C7 U up a) ~y 0 0 .w O & 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' .z Q = > U C •� 7 e` N VO "Cl- N 0 0 O o �. U i W N •-- N O › 0 en a =Q 0 U aID a0 C '' rear oaca IS.,.4 W '' ,b c. 7 avid a w o °, tel 0\ N .� v, .y a) --' vn o a, oo v co.., r — (3y O .Q w 0 >, < N —� M —4 N M.,^ .N0 „„ � E � v o � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •6i p ;�, � = N kr) M \O 00 M O c o h 0 ct v a) (1.5 4 c0i „C y 'I. oo p cf.; n N o U ►� 144o U , ea 1) .', - N 0 •o d ta 0 a) Y o ccs ^a R 0 a` b •� y id > a U a>) a) �a "� p ��++ 'yam' iti W y c�tl yam•, M 0 to p, 00 �--� 01 00 } .�. +•' yam,,, U • 0 U �1 00 Q1 0, N N 7 y Z O > •a � ¢' 1y y -c), a) `a, � }' a) p 3 'S7 i0 0 00 o o 0 0 0 0 `�•� 3. b a� c) ki _ •� CD O) 7 sn CD CO .4.. 0 o Z pA o ai , p O v Li N co O s: Lf) O O) O = 0 a� y ❑ tt O C •D y �M y 37 �" O II C cd Ri �+ O Q v m 7 kr) cr, 7 O1 � 7 0 4) Q� a) ao v, c0 yy .� ... O, 00 M 00 N 7 N Lac chi a3 v, 'C7 a) U N �O M 0 N 7 N °� h .? •p y^' C "'a6i cn a) > a' Q N M s� h 00 N 7 > co a) .L7 O N c0 U .b L7 (° tot a"� .0 0)i .b ••0A iC v 0 00e3 13 1 73 `"zC O �>'.ti -4 co co 0) . a `46-' 0 c _ os '� Ri cC > O y 3 y 00 H E y •vj u v aI"i v, .'zi • �y H .' ' b '� 3 ° a j 2 b o N c az 04 v as is ,t.,' .�~ Q 0 Z ¢ 0 a e. y c'ci 04 „'-, z� 0 > N a) .-i a) v1 'fl �� Q•1 a) " U F O /'� '�' C .O a, C7 b > o = = > _ z z C 07,1 < = < 2U , o. 03 H z°z° o t ' \ • �� , N r.+'64 IN y Op 'Ct _in et OM1 00 N 0 c _— ca O 25 O p" b ox"� A ou 44 t pr 0 N. In N a - - - 00 a O VI.1% CID Q 7 "" N r in c/1 00 \° j` ,� O N yd v v, ° cr s �n o0 01 01 t� OI c.. O tvl «i b M in- = N A. C) M O b�A up N 1-. 0 ✓' y in 00 N N 00 N in in O O1) 0 03 '7,1 U V1 n N 00 of in O in in C �+ U 5 Q 10 .--I M �t N 00 0 b E-4 M '.0 is • O b C a ,,, c z O " o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R7 H w 01 N N N'.0 10 '.0 1p �+ 0 ►�- �p O • to Glc m O, ''+ 4) cz 03 Co O . 'b 0. Oid N 01 00 Cr, in O 01 N 00 y In 10 00 in r- Q1 N .O OA 00 .........., U O 01 00. 00 N —' U Q 0 N O N -- M - N ,M^-, c cd „ w Vj U 00 y at o op.. 'ti" OSA c o at o co u O a: O o o o 0 0 0 0 OJ ,,, a O ..� O N N 00 01 N �0 01 .O +.. 1..., O = N N et N 00 00 v1 + ... O C .4 �" 0 04 aCi y a3 co w cd 03 qi- a, i u 2 0...0*— 3 ..: 0b4 b 0 I. N c.. I� O a• ,`S.0 • O O Lz, co m v ie >,6 cn .2 'te �. y N \0 01 M M N 1/40 0--0 C L Q .•' �cC. .� 4. r�� U. M O in kr) co — 01 00 01 o0 ^ctl. 0 0 cd +•, CO O Nl 7 01 01 N a� 0 O Cl)VCCG am. Q�•, bA — M o , Q., p 0 .0 c es O 0 � • O C ',E'1 vUi O U D ,,, DO 0 it .� r') -LI U L, 4. h � 'A• * C.) 0 •3-', y 01 00 M o0 N V kr) :tl 0 U •- i C,' V N \D M CO, N N 0 Y N O o o dl O on cd N m tV1 00 l� eh •n ,. O EA Vj _� •Z. � C�' N M 01 m CSV ,� U .�,, ty U . y 0 C 0 4 L° y •^m w 0 .4 u, w tm •� ,I �„ z co 2 `� is v� ? N °' bi) °' aUi �, C p .v C O a0i �Qj V] asci z U 00 4) U esti /�\ N i a) ' 2 t ¢ O o o • oma. a) ? H = "O .�'. co .O '= a. •E ca a) .N . 0 mi 70 g at I. � at 0a • 2 5OZ N: co d' c . Ld pi � '..•,. ;� M > N m ' U • a ca ti C C N• . ytio ,* M O N O N n w p agV a.• N U O ' O "''• '. O.itt -it co N UU yi > 3 r. i 1:1 01 y a) N ca),6.1N O 0 O 0.-, a . MUg fU U h G y -o � U matlcmp o I . ED by •y ) U � ai i oo $. , I. . to , , � " > : $ • ° �°h b et bEtgco . oj woa o � +" o0ti=i ) .o •b ▪ o � U . ' m p ¢ ~ ° � O . -to1104 ° = ..0 cu Um , . ° . ` � a ° ° • IZ ti� o ▪ o� ^a) n > a, -O b 0, c4 as U .o rUe.. a) O m ra, Q y • c; .. cti os . ho ., No = Uo : ~� = 0ooa eaow0 .: a 0 • 0 0 .5 . 3a , ooa � as "CI co" '" - O _" v b a)0, c.) tag b ab , of byz at doo i .5 a . UNw � o . 0 o o MI . ect w 0 U Z0 °) `� o • N ° • s._-, ON ed C ' b 0 '� ° - Z aa ,1 C O '5 O 4 '� 's O 110 c. en CI U o aoOaztq .62 ° H -- _ o '� aa c awzz ho z ON /"'"'N .) 0 . coC= •-•" NO E, C = •X .5 ; amO a) , .. U o 44 4-1 a) ..w y b 0 's - G •bvitiCO � q) ^I V4 01) 0 .4 > ' 1a,•• ' 04 " b 0V , `o y cc/a 4 on � as > • -0 -z e .- 0-, cti � ° • a •� °p _ o•., a) 1100 „11� er a) d ai y _� 0.. ai Cl..) r,' '.. h N al Tri U U v C 0' X 0 . o ami . 3 -0 11wo � ��. R �' h wd -� _ 'a O s CCa o .� O ca 0 `Oy a 0 co -, °' a o 6Qoa) .. Q +I oy o • ; o w 00 cd x 0 o '� ce o ..o 0 'r 0 4 N o7.4 ° a) as up . o 00 0°0 y o0 7. rU ci) en V tj OUOU O OD • y .�1 j Ov O a) CO 0 mi y o 00 0 x '': (CI 5 V. o ' OQ C •tn 0wVi0 >., O NO � va"• a, CO a) 0 0 0• . >, a 0 ? > oa0 >o w ? w, "N Oji v "` tt b t.) e'O ea h 0 h ti r0 a ,,, 4. A cn 0Ct an E' 6.1 - w mo 1• "" I Z yu, w y = 0 c0 y e et opo 0 0.1 oa O ttS o '� ' p w CL p 2 4) CIS .O I N I co `ice G. O —O O F.' o 0,3 _ �_ /) s .O ...5, co q11") cts OyLes 0 /W C , .LUQ. C o91-1 cz ti cp - aa.)-M CU ; cp , NNv .D p. c. p, 5 Z p C.o . a.)co j It to"Co ° ° > o 0w : U0U .aN .d I U oto U bq ▪ N a+ CIA, CU G C o h '`Z No ..p a • cn •ao '�,'. a� c' • T tee o e 0 0 0 w t.240, )...1 1 it 4 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 , � G�4. ^ 0 00 O .A o. Q�, C po . , 4an t7i 24 g:4 Gn cI. \ Q al 4) O 0 ° 0 CV ON o b o x cv on Q .,� i o c U V . ya 0 yE i .4 O y w ,I. C vs x co 0 00 . CU 01 el)40 0) .9 o co w = a) a) -b > q U .., ° y ca r"+cel a� p. to CO CQ.+ [e > a, i_, .+ ° ... o 'd O cn O ) c � b al � •. bD b z � 0 rd at .. G0 al Cal 1-. N •� 0 at � > o cn DI 0 4p w o > • CCI p \ w pp .z 'j •-= 0.) N p. P"64 tn 04a;o a . � ° > � 0 4 � '� Non a.b ? m c CTt co P. 0 = cow 0 -0 z -o o ¢ CO -o caou .� .bd a' may (0 °'N ° :~C0O := ; .o Ei 3 t 3 '> y -o 02a2-) T"- oma , 0 °C - t,M to o b IN al. y .+° o CU N a) a) 04 CUPO v pp z d � ° 0N w : ' UN 0 . 14Z. `� °q±° 3U .� ¢ ' a xd z0. - xU° 7:1 c4 •> `° +° co CA En Z CC $ coo ¢ '� ro . .". s~ a� cod a� o Q d z `�, aoi o0 oti G, co co -o `° x ti z °"-- •0 z . .0 x a .° . o o a;oz .°°. ca .� b ai a4 "�" ix a) •4 w G > Q>OA .) cow v•i e t t 10 io o, 0>i cooA d cu = .a) > 0.' &, • w &, • 0 U yU C) N ,Z > C ci a) y co �'L "it n� cn 0 t~ C'" s~ co ':. ¢c� c>o CO`ao C cll �' +. O < L) Z O '� UU Z OU ca :� Z OQo a.) rn .71 1 ? ;N ° 64 401 fek • • no 71 p� 4 w t` r CO N 117 3d M0 0u Sy to a MVrt^ y, lit' O0 b ^Crd z h C73 �t i i Q 0 lit b f` ti =M M rMtD 1p em ,cc, ' M N W 0.v Qp ,t c t in it It) ad bo 0 cs,1.4 >n " `' aaco .= i. 5oLn H '' M ONt \Net CO OCO o cuifi OA C U b c s d ti r o M r �.O a) 0nW M � d °a , v - . cd0N M to .a) 0 r Ce) mA f E o O ct • aN to ,c t` r (.0)e?€N al c • ,O U �. ti .d to 0 a 411 m o 3 'to' vi 4.4 C In cz G, s , , or Oy iH cNco tu 4,� NI. O rW 00 or UI rt 1w co 0 = .,./-.•,„4.1 O co Tzi i— ct u p O OC 4OA bA, J b4• �a) _ ® .1-21 0 >.O •..41 O) --a. —• rw . b O O . va)C O N y . yG . ,O s® 13 ..Y,:', :%1 0. \ ' y.,; _ 0 . 03 iii 1:1o>� •� Q. Cs0 m) a •E >Eti c,,, ~ ybC" 4-,b0 p Q 0.) OO oq y � z a NZ Q � a. v'cd a. ! U 0nL}4 AtQ [d•ymyy c > •ti O d 4.[ NO N s-Cj JCl Cr)j v,• CL 0 a) 5- a • k. a,a) > G CRN •NO � ., .s 0 o°, Na, n 0ZU p C = 0 w . .)a� m d dmv p C •0.04.1 • t 7%,:N N Q t) e co 4.4 IJ w t 0 To '1.4 141 a .g N VI � , , m C 2 I- la 17) b 0 . 4: o N �' O U .ia C "mak d ca h L 5 Q i m d r� � Mgr o !} ta "Ci _J O 3 w Q ofti .0 cn _ �s k - f ` O � as 0 71:7 y .44 cd w .+ � . exp L. Q '1. ` O E C $ E 1 s't5 e > Vl I f:✓ `® dd :.,',]V',, „ 1 �r} O r JZ y 2 , dd $ d d LI: • NF diN tit o VW .40 �*AZ W O 'yL A3to a d eh -� C > ? o� My N L 'a1C c'.3 O , `— a J. : rQ-� y ios Q c =, ,� CL N4 e kr_ _N '•� e ee e DE e -e e e e e m U 0 0 0 ° ° ,2 C. 0 0 0 0 Z.' a7 N I... O c- ,0***., 2,0***., °`' paepue;s uoi;emesaId en a 44 1 w • SRN � o o t .1,44 f� � e To oW CO 2 I— .sem, CD 4.44 CZ N F� crop ac, z gyp•-, '',�, .�8 _ .«� m od >.n CD 1:3 0 0 V .0L axe" ...y�.. `� ,r• 1 t*. > Vo c y ps Os ea •cs c/) _ z F k o. _ = 07 c 0 = = O o > r.. CO d = Q a. V Q 2 = s d **, 0) si v Z .41 iT) CO it f •-• •+ ; V g > E N e a c cc 0 l - h h Q `Ir tg ,.,-C iw .w '"., ' W faw H Q co ca F , O .O L ;S n a) � x k C, G1 ' o - g air o .,, k . 3 C r. a , COO .O ,,,„..— ‘01 %d` ci > a _ .. 'a tea, O 42 � mp W U) eV ,,EA qR .� :� Q x ' o, 'O 01 O w z . L S. V � � _ . £ 144 A 're. °"C .-, o . . .�g e e a e e a c � U ' m o ^ 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 1�, V O 00 b h O e, N piepue;s uollen.lasaJd alis ,—• w Ca 'N h � c it 03 ki �L AC "telI/AC2 Nva # F l0 !tel L. ci 1,1 0 L ti 35 $ aye 'ker .,;c" L cc 4.10 vz W Cr .1.., .� < �Y 3 i3 q cod � . ; Ems: a �� z a 21.i E 1:1 g24 L may. g P b Ws '1v 0rte_. n 5 i c A et -a as— 4-0 ,r_in -bn ....L..) co) p.,,:i.„,..,,,.•:„.,.,,,.-, '4 1.** r: .. ,,,-;,.../f. ,., IN z as CORI o Ot , ,,, ,t1 ...., CU as as Q : V ... w Q Q- ad) NTs co .Qre es-aNr a ' 0 CD oVCw+ 0 til .N �6 M cu O e — s.,-&-..,..., ID w -0 > -0 -.0 riVi..,4"9„F,i ' - V- �" � 0 m 2 0� ,., V ., '• a �, 0 �.: 0 ;N .S o o o eY o e o 0 0 e Lt. U e a e o o e ..1':. e e e e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti � 0 a, co 1� !O to M N r 4. C paepue;g uoi;ua;ab an!;e;e6eA w i Apr- 19-04 09: 31A Talon Management 239 262 6198 P.02 - _ au Amok mu Exhibit V.F.6 MI MI MANAGEMENT April 19, 2004 To: Rural Fringe Stakeholders Sub-Committee From: Tim Hancock, AICP Subject: TDR's required for build-out of the Receiving Areas (revised) For the sake of this analysis, it is assumed that there are 23,000 acres of Receiving Lands available for the application and use of TDR's. Based on the current allowable residential densities in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, the following scenarios were developed: Maximum Utilization: 2500 acre Rural Village (with 500 acre greenbelt): • Base Density of 600 units (3,000 ac x .2 upa) • Maximum Density of 3 upa (7,500 units) • Requires the purchase of 3,450 TDR's (+ a bonus of 3,450 units) A total of three (3) 1,500 acre Rural Villages (with 200 acre greenbelt): • Base Density of 340 units each (1.700 ac x .2 upa) • Maximum Density of 3 upa (4,500 units each) • Requires the purchase of 2,080 TDR's each (+ bonus of 2,080 units each) • Total of 6,240 TDR's required Balance of Receiving totals 14,900 acres • Base Density of 2,980 units (14,900 x .2 upa) • Maximum Density of 1 upa(14,900 units) • Requires 11,920 units Total Units required for Maximum Development Levels: 21,610 units. Anticipated Utilization • 2500 acre Rural Village (with 500 acre greenbelt): • Base Density of 600 units (3,000 ac x .2 upa) • Maximum Density of 3 upa (7,500 units) • Requires the purchase of 3,450 TDR's (+a bonus of 3.450 units) Phone: 239-262-6197 Fox: 239262-6198 • Email: TalonManagementnaearthlink.net Office Address: 3898 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 202, Naples, FL 3410340 Mailing Address:P.O. Box 9229, Naples, FL 34101 Apr- 10-04 09: 31A Talon Management 239 262 6198 P .03 1 Three(3) 1,500 acre Rural Villages (with 200 acre greenbelt): • Base Density of 340 units each (1,700 ac x .2 upa) • Density of 3 upa (4,500 units) ' • Requires the purchase of 2,080 each TDR's(+bonus of 2,080 units) • A total of 6,240 TDR's required Balance or Receiving totals 14,900 acres • Assume a maximum of 50% build out • Base Density of 1,490 units(7,450 ac x .2 upa) • Maximum Density of 1 upa(7,450 units) • Requires 5,960 TDR's Total units required for mid-level Utilization is 15,650. Minimum Utilization No Rural Villages 50%Utilization of Receiving Areas • Base Density of 2,300 units (11,500 ac x .2 upa) • Maximum density of 1 upa(11,500 acres) • Requires 9,200 units. Total units required for low-level utilization is 9,200 EXHIBIT V.G.4 ,""N LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Robert L. Duane a Rrurp AndPrsnn & Thomas W_ Reese (Name of Agent) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property iden this Applic.tion. Signed: f, Date: 4 ` .a.\ I (N- • I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. ,----) (- ,; ,, Ei 1. Signature of Applicant Dc4c\ E \'3 Name — Typed or Printed STATE OF ( {(—ONDA- ) COUNTY OF ( C DLL'6 2 ) n Sworn to and subscribed before me this a day of APR 1 L , 20 04 By R-A-6 C..CS\<OEk4(G MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 1i,, :"•. FRMICESD.KOENIG Notary PublicI.: 1 MY ECOIMRMISSJION ADD034859l � 47'T'r eondad Trhiu NouryuPuble O nd�dNrs CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: —. Xwho is personally known to me, who has produced as identification and did take an Oath did not take an Oath NOTICE — BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 — False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and/or n maximum of a sixty day jail term." . 04/21/04 15:54 FAX 2398435130 FWF SWFL OFFICEfJ003 04/21/2004 10 :35 TEL 92542099 H M LAND DEVELOPMENT ib 002/003 • /"'N EXIBTT V.G.4f-- LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN. I ' . ,i- F B ce •nde •n cLo as W. Reese 1 hereby authorize (Namee of Agent) to serve as my Agent in a request to • - d the Collier C.4runty Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in this Appllcad Signed: le; Data: 1746//40 471 I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application Is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. Oie• /Signature ofai;plicant r_, � / k (41'. G /-V/ Name-Typed or Printed STATE OF ( � ' ) COUNTY OF ( es-et-) n Sworn to and subscribed before me this °'-1 day of Pc --k 20 c 7 O By �(tr DIY COMMISSION EXPIRES: ��a� Notary PublicE.w*ose ° My Commission 0D2771V CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: , of ExpiresApt1120,200S who is personally known to me, ✓ who has produced t) Ve- d,---C c • as Identification and did take an Oath / did not take an Oath NOTICE - BE *ARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 - False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in;writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term." , EXHIBIT V.G.4 n LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Robert L. Duane 8t Bruce Anderson & Thomas W. Reese (Name of Agent) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in this Applica/tilon. Signed: CL,,.., .--('' Date: `/ =/ o Y I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. -w-_e_/et/ I Y Signature o licant C-t.r 6%r—A Name—T�ped or Printed STATE OF (Lieadcc ) COUNTY OF (6j j� ) Sworn to and subscribed before me this 4/ day of 94.d, , 20 Pi/ By'/ .4 4ite-1l�ll4 KkG{ MY : Notary Public COMMISSION EXPIRES. CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: .'�siy'•' ,.,'�=PAULETTE DFBUS CFIARgppNEAU A MY COMMISSION Y CC 958900 !/ who is personally known to me, '�` EXPIRES:December 7,2004 .',�,. Boded Thio Wily Pubic UndmMbn who has produced as identification and ``did take an Oath did not take an Oath NOTICE — BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 - False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and/or n maximum of a sixty day jail term." i EXHIBIT 1 TABLE B_1 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2003 WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN UPDATE Range of Wastewater Flow Projections Based on October 1 Permanent Populations for Each Year Greeley and Hansen LLC May 2004 YEAR AREA 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 TOTAL POPULATIONS BY AREA Master Plan Growth Estimate(From Table 5-6) Sewered North 61,365 88,874 110,014 128,700 137,300 146,000 154,600 Unsewered North:Other 6,537 8,300 10,20Q 12,000 13,500 15,000 16,500 Unsewered: Golden Gate Estates 8,111 9,700 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 Golden Gate City 21,292 24,700 24,700 24,700 24,700 24,700 24,700 Orange Tree 4,547 6,300 6,900 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Sewered South 64,310 81,537 100,931 119,300 133,500 147,800 162,000 Unsewered South 2,870 4,100 5,000 5,800 6,300 6,800 7,200 Rural Fringe Area: Northeast 2,281 2,300 4,100 8,600 13,200 17,700 22,200 East Central 183 200 1,200 3,700 6,200 8,600 11,100 Southeast 400 400 1,400 3,800 6,200 8,700 11,100 Total Master Plan Growth Estimate 171,896 226,411 275,945 325,600 359,900 394,300 428,400 SEWERED POPULATIONS BY AREA Master Plan Growth Estimate Sewered North 61,365 88,874 110,014 128,700 137,300 146,000 154,600 /"\ Unsewered North:Other 0 0 3,300 6,600 9,900 13,200 16,500 Unsewered: Golden Gate Estates 0 0 2,300 4,600 6,900 9,200 11,500 Golden Gate City 0 0 4,940 9,880 14,820 19,760 24,700 Orange Tree 0 0 0 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Sewered South 64,310 81,537 100,931 119,300 133,500 147,800 162,000 Unsewered South 0 0 1,440 2,880 4,320 5,760 7,200 Rural Fringe Area: Northeast 0 0 2,000 7,100 12,100 17,200 22,200 East Central 0 0 1,100 3,500 6,100 8,600 11,100 Southeast 0 0 1,000 3,500 6,100 8,600 11,100 Total Master Plan Growth Estimate 125,675 170,411 227,025 293,560 338,540 383,620 428,400 SEWERED WASTEWATER FLOW BY AREA Unit Flow (gpcd) Master Plan Growth Estimate Average Annual Flows-mgd Sewered North 145 8.90 12.89 15.95 18.66 19.91 21.17 22.42 Unsewered North:Other 145 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.96 1.44 1.91 2.39 Unsewered: Golden Gate Estates 145 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.67 1.00 1.33 1.67 Golden Gate City 120 0.00 0.00 0.59 1.19 1.78 2.37 2.96 Orange Tree 120 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Sewered South 100 6.43 8.15 10.09 11.93 13.35 14.78 16.20 Unsewered South 100 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.29 0.43 0.58 0.72 Rural Fringe Area: Northeast 120 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.85 1.45 2.06 2.66 East Central 120 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.42 0.73 1.03 1.33 Southeast 120 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.42 0.73 1.03 1.33 Total Master Plan Growth Estimate 15.33 21.04 28.09 36.28 41.72 47.17 52.59 /"'N Table B-I Source:2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update I of 2 May 2004 Y A YEAR AREA 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 SEWERED WASTEWATER FLOW BY AREA Unit Flow (gPcd) Master Plan Growth Estimate Maximum Month Flows-mgd Sewered North 189 11.57 16.75 20.74 24.26 25.88 27.52 29.14 Unsewered North:Other 189 0.00 0.00 0.62 1.24 1.87 2.49 3.11 Unsewered: Golden Gate Estates 189 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.87 1.30 1.73 2.17 Golden Gate City 156 0.00 0.00 0.77 1.54 2.31 3.08 3.85a Orange Tree 156 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 Sewered South 130 8.36 10.60 13.12 15.51 17.36 19.21 21.06 Unsewered South 130 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.37 0.56 0.75 0.94 Rural Fringe Area: Northeast 156 0.00 0.00 0.31 1.11 1.89 2.68 3.46 East Central 156 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.55 0.95 1.34 1.73 Southeast 156 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.55 0.95 1.34 1.73 Total Master Plan Growth Estimate 19.93 27.35 36.51 47.17 54.24 61.33 68.37 SEWERED WASTEWATER FLOW BY WRF Master Plan Growth Estimate Maximum Month Flows-mgd NCWRF Sewered North 11.57 16.75 20.74 24.26 25.88 27.52 27.06 Unsewered North:Other 0.00 0.00 0.62 1.24 1.87 2.49 3.11 Total NCWRF 11.57 16.75 21.36 25.50 27.75 30.01 30.17 Northeast WRF Sewered North 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00' 0.00 2.09 Unsewered North:Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unsewered: Golden Gate Estates 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.39 0.59 0.78 0.98' Orange Tree 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 Rural Fringe Area-Northeast 0.00 0.00 0.31 1.11 1.89 2.68 3.46 • Total Northeast WRF 0.00 0.00 0.75 2.67 3.64 4.63 7.69 East Central WRF Unsewered: Golden Gate Estates 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.72 0.95 1.19 Golden Gate City 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 2.31 3.08 3.85 Sewered and Unsewered South 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 1.07 1.60 1.76 Rural Fringe Area-East Central 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.95 1.34 1.73 Total East Central WRF 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.94 5.05 6.97 8.54 • Southeast WRF Sewered and Unsewered South 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 1.20 2.64 4.60 Rural Fringe Area-Southeast 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.95 1.34 1.73 Total Southeast WRF 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 2.15 3.98 6.33 SCWRF Golden Gate City 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rural Fringe Area-East Central 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sewered and Unsewered South 8.36 10.60 13.31 14.75 15.64 15,73 15.64 Rural Fringe Area-Southeast 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total SCWRF 8.36 10.60 14.41 15.66 15.64 15.73 15.64 • /'"%. Table B-1 Source:2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update 2 of 2 May 2004 O ^ 'O vi.* m l}2D m f.l O N 00 se. V1 00 NN 0 N In O b T Oe, r-- In M o n O ,0 r y ON b tiN 2 0 N N N '0 O N V ,D tai 's 2 00 N N N ,0 g 0004 0000 b N O 'O` N R Vi N 0[., pp e{ p N V 0 00 ? ,e,12 —b s N )+i vi N vi S N N N aT O N 10 O ,_ O N N N rn vi N ^ S h N N a, � v. m 8 4 os 2 N N Ml 'a N c,— VlfV V1 V1 V1 00 aa 00 00 N 00 00 N OD O N N - N vl N 0 O - 0� N a N N �,m M ^• N , so Oa, W V`O) 'I) 0 ,O 00 N N N ^ N V — O N V O V1 ,O C W 1n V1 ,O 0 V 1- h N G 3 N N N — •— = N Q W — Q G a V b V C O co V Nos 1 0. W N N N V La 6-,ti 0V0 N O, S ,O M N, 7.O; L a O M N 0 O N' D O N N"Cr G 0 N_ .ch 8v 11 ' h O O vii + m 4N IC0 N [V O O NNNNN - N On z a W a g 2 S S v SFO 0 n .. ° . c N c o o ,; vigrl NV�N' ` ,, NN N a .r]F 3 C7 e h 8 8 = 0,661, e a n c 0 0 0 � c vl a O ¢ ea N N N H1 N V ..l O .4. b S' O N M V1 N d O N C C C ni s. en N 00 0. N C W CL vi O, 6V1O SO SO h vi NN e,i . VN OOC SO SO 0 Vh ^ O N C N S O O C O N N INen en en 01 8 8 N O b _ O _ ry N N N 8 8 8 .��. 8 0^0 - O O O C O h OG N N N N N _ O M ,00 0 O 0 O^ M 00 OOS. S V. O O G • g V , g N N 0. I) 0 4) E) 0) 4) 0 C) 0 g E E- 0 0 W W W 1E W W W 3 a 0 I0 0 a O 5 c5 c� 5 0 /� a a 3 a a a 0. a ") �6') 3 114 :g II ; ie. L V 7 z z w cn En o z .Parks &Recreations - JUL 11, 2004 - 1:07:18 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT 2 Wednesday, August 11 of 2004 • sr a • S t i. - `4 9 3 ,,T Naples Area Por 1� �,., (B 1)E r eic ees ti:.rs7�a 9+x EYt i'%5 (C2)E '. B2 E e.,044titi ♦ Prese prC'ar rns wa paha t (B3)E -d, .sx • r . (B4)E ; * thletic w:r. .SiPa ♦ 0 (B5er 4 ).+M.S r4.1*. 40 (B6)I '°*;,Xp JDeclf=l�1 C.•./ nt�B 1 B......, ,....,YSrwC'.i.1 Acces Ntoits t +i`in -1,.,..2110.t..4. A,.' t i (P1) tr-Ief 7,7.p utic _.. Neigh ', `' rei�re aolon t �,. (P2)E Park (P3)C Facilit,%2, rental Neigh h y ' , Ir1c=yrrfl, lr�l"1 r # (P4)E ` ryv,•r;. - s Comn • (P5)k .+. reai t i- t17r1 • T x.- Comn IriFt}fT1;1 Jtll r1 .-'' ! - (P6)C 1 Comn i '4"..7:C.-: I (P7)C iaErler l - - l• ;4 f... . !'-. i � Comn Inf=clrmF,131�:Jrl -- "� and F r (P8)C Iocatca mac . ' I . _y Comn '' 3 (P9A) summer Gaal + • Panth Park 1.,. _ (P10) Neigh (P11) } - Comn 411 (P12) T. • Village 0 Park (P13) ca Comn (P14) ivt f4, ,, Comn ar A'' (P15) iComn 4 (P16) (P17) Regio (P18) Neigh (P19) Neigh (SP1) ElemE Pelty (SP2) ElemE ,........, Schoc (SP3) ElemE httn•//cxlcx1c11 rnlliarrrnv nat/na Are/rnl1iarrniintvrdaraa/inr-av html R/1 1/2004 ' Parks & Recreations - JUL 11, 2004 - 1:07:18 Page 2 of 2 Immoktialee Area ?arks s - (B12)L { *' (P20)Jr z F . _�' Comml IP (P21)Ir Comple �. :....,c., �� (P22)Ir KW f.^yyj tabor% Fre. Park (P23)C (P24)S 6Neighbi 0 _ 441.,,, ; (P25)T Comms (SP3)li School (P26)C Neighbi Mai co Islor d Asea Parks (B8)Ce (B9)Sc Access . (B10)C MAp'Cc Boating C011.19SAf (B11)T FAY h sa allib' Guar c* MEXCOt r .TY r' A.Rf LD hB.Y CAXAM AS PAS Copyright 1998,Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida Site maintained by Exploritech,Inc.I Site recommended by http://www.colliergov.net/parks/colliercountyp/area/index.html 8/11/2004 V JUL-22-2004 16 04 COLLIER CO PRK P.02/03 PARK ACREAGE EXHIBIT 3 NOVEMBER 2003 1 TOTAL FUND FUND FUND NOT USED ACRES 001 t11-GEN 111•MSTD NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS 1 Coconut Clrole Park 1.2 1.2 2 Poinciana Park 0.3 0.3 3 Aaron Lutz 3.2 3.2 4 Palm Springs 6.7 6.7 5 Isles of Capri 0.15 0.15 6 South Immokalee Park 32 3.2 7 011Well Park 5.5 5.5 8 Airport Park 19.0 19.0 9 Copeland 0.5 0.5 10'East Naples Tot Lot 0.3 0.3 11 Dreamland(Pinecrest) 0.5 0.5 12 Rita Eaton(Tract 179) 4.8 •4.8 13 N Naples Neighborhood 2 lots 0.4 0.4 14 Connor Park 5 5.0 15 Willoughby 12 1.2 Livingston land sold-removed • 51.0 0.0 23.3 28.7 COMMUNITY PARKS 1 Golden Gate Community Paris 35.0 35.0 2 Veterans Community Park 40.0 40.0 3 Vineyards Community Park 35.5 35.5 ,,.1 4 East Naples community Park 47.0 47.0 . 5 Gulf Coast Community Park 5.0 5.0 6 Pelican Bay Community Park 15.0 15.0 7 Max E. Hasse, Jr. Comm Park 20.0 20.0 8 Eagle Lakes Park 32.0 32.0 9 Immokalee Community Park 23.0 • 23.0 10 Immokalee Sports Complex 14.0 14.0 11 Tony Rosbough 7.0 7.0 12 Golden Gate Pathways 5.0 5.0 278.5 -11:17-----77------4-5 44.0 • BEACH PARKS 1 Tigertail Beach 31.6 31,6 2 South Marco Beach Access 5.0 5.0 • 3 North Gulf Shore Access 0.5 0.5 4 Vanderbilt Beach 5.0 5.0 Vanderbilt Access 0.5 0.5 5 4 Walkways-Gulfshore Blvd N 0.5 0.5 6 Barefoot Beach Preserve 345.6 345.6 7 Barefoot Beach Access 5.0 5.0 8 Barefoot Outparcel 1.7 1.7 9 Goodland(Dolphin Cove) 5.0 5.0 9 Clam Pass Park 35.0 35.0 43 .4 435.4 0.0 0.0 TOTAL FUND FUND FUND . . . JUL-22-2004 16:04 COLLIER CO PRK 1 P,03iO3 ACRES UU9 1 1'1"mmn 1 1 1-my.r BOAT RAMP PARKS 1 Bayview Park 4.2 4.2 2 Caxambas Park 4.2 4.2 3 Lake Trafford 2.3 2.3 4 Cocohatchee River Park 7.2 7.2 5 SR 951 Boat Ramp 0.5 0.5 18.4 11.9 4.2 2.3 REGIONAL PARKS 1 Sugden Regional Park 120.0 120.0 2 North Naples Regional Park 212.0 0.0 212 3 GG/School BoardNand Ext. 120.0 0.0 120 452.0 0.0 120.0 0.0 332 OTHER FACILITIES 2 Manatee Property 60.0 0.0 60 3 Orange Tree 56.0 0.0 56 4 Golden Gate Community Center 14.0 14.0 5•Jane's Scenic Drive 142.0 0.0 142 6 Immokalee Admin Building 0.0 0.0 7 Lucerne Property(adj to GGCC) 7.0 '7.0 8 Conner Park(Bluebill) 5.0 5.0 9 Lake Trafford Cemetery 20.0 20.0 304.0 0.0 26.0 20.0 258 SCHOOL PARKS 1 Naples Park Elementary 5.0 5.0 2 Immokalee High School 1.0 1.0 3 Corkscrew Elementary '12.0 12.0 4 Osceola Elementary 3.0 3:0 5 Sabal Palm(MLK) 9.0 9 •30.0 17.0 13.0 GRAND TOTAL 1670.2 447.3 426.0 108.0 590.0 GRAND TOTAL 1570.3 • AUIR 1548 (-L T Cemetery 20) i TOTAL P.03 EXHIBIT 6 1.7 Conclusions The vision for management of wastewater in Collier County is established in this 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update. Elements of the recommended plan are listed in Section 9 of the Master Plan report by 5-year planning periods. 1 Wastewater Treatment FY 2004-2008: • Complete expansion of the NCWRF to 24.1 MGD MMDF and construction of two deep injection wells • Complete expansion of the SCWRF to 16.0 MGD MMDF and construction of one additional deep injection well • Prepare a decommissioning study for the Pelican Bay WRF and remove the plant from service after the NCRWF expansion to 24.1 MGD is complete • Acquire sites for new East Central and Southeast WRFs • Complete construction of two 1.5 MG equalization tanks at the NCWRF • Conduct study to re-rate NCWRF capacity • Construct new 2.0 MGD MMDF Northeast WRF and deep injection wells FY 2009-2013: • Construct new 2.0 MGD MMDF East Central WRF and deep injection wells • Expand Northeast WRF to 4.0 MGD MMDF FY 2014-2018: • Expand NCWRF to 30.6 MGD MMDF • Expand East Central WRF to 6.0 MGD MMDF • Construct new 2.0 MGD Southeast WRF FY 2019-2023: • Expand Northeast WRF to 6.0 MGD MMDF • Expand Southeast WRF to 4.0 MGD MMDF 2 Wastewater Collection and Transmission FY 2004-2008: • Complete the North—South transmission systems interconnections • Improve pumping station capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 • Improve transmission force main capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 • Construct two master pump stations • Continue to rehabilitate pumping stations and collection systems • Complete inflow and infiltration studies for the wastewater collection systems in the North and South Service Areas and implement recommended repairs • Complete installation of telemetry to all existing pumping stations FY 2009-2013: • Construct regional interconnections to the Northeast and East Central Service Areas and new master pumping stations n 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update 13 May 25,2004 . • Continue to rehabilitate pumping stations and collection systems • Provide wastewater service to Orange Tree • Improve pumping station capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 • Improve transmission force main capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 FY 2014-2018: • Construct regional interconnection from the South Service Area to the Southeast Service Area and associated master pumping station • Continue to rehabilitate pumping stations and collection systems • Improve pumping station capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 • Improve transmission force main capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 FY 2019-2023: • Continue to rehabilitate pumping stations and collection systems • Improve pumping station capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 • Improve transmission force main capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 3 Bio solids FY 2004-2008: • Implement biosolids management program 4 Reclaimed Water FY 2004-2008: • Complete Reclaimed Water Master Plan • Add reclaimed water transmission pipelines to improve system capacity, pressure and reliability • Add reclaimed water pumping station to enhance flow transfer capacities between the NCWRF and SCWRF. • Add additional customers as sufficient irrigation water is available • Begin construction of ASR reclaimed water wells • Coordinate implementation of Regional Irrigation Distribution System (RIDS)with SFWMD • Complete FDEP requirements for Eagle Lakes Nature Interpretive Center FY 2009-2013: • Continue transmission system improvements and construction of ASR reclaimed water wells • Continue development of supplemental irrigation water sources • Implement recommendations made in the Reclaimed Water Master Plan 5 General FY 2004-2008: • Construct new Public Utilities Operations Center 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update 14 May 25,2004 • /'\ • Develop an on-site treatment plan to determine whether to extend service to areas served by septic tanks or if other on-site treatment enhancement programs should be implemented • Develop improved Concurrency Management System • Develop asset management system and conduct a CMOM self- evaluation in anticipation of upcoming regulations • Implement recommendations made in Reclaimed Water Master Plan Ongoing • Update the wastewater master plan and impact fee and rate analyses • Continue to expand SCADA and GIS systems to focus on using these technologies as reliability measurement tools /'•\ 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update 15 May 25,2004 EXHIBIT 6 1.7 Conclusions The vision for management of wastewater in Collier County is established in this 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update. Elements of the recommended plan are listed in Section 9 of the Master Plan report by 5-year planning periods. 1 Wastewater Treatment FY 2004-2008: • Complete expansion of the NCWRF to 24.1 MGD MMDF and construction of two deep injection wells • Complete expansion of the SCWRF to 16.0 MGD MMDF and construction of one additional deep injection well • Prepare a decommissioning study for the Pelican Bay WRF and remove the plant from service after the NCRWF expansion to 24.1 MGD is complete • Acquire sites for new East Central and Southeast WRFs • Complete construction of two 1.5 MG equalization tanks at the NCWRF • Conduct study to re-rate NCWRF capacity • Construct new 2.0 MGD MMDF Northeast WRF and deep injection wells FY 2009-2013: • Construct new 2.0 MGD MMDF East Central WRF and deep injection wells !-� • Expand Northeast WRF to 4.0 MGD MMDF FY 2014-2018: • Expand NCWRF to 30.6 MGD MMDF • Expand East Central WRF to 6.0 MGD MMDF • Construct new 2.0 MGD Southeast WRF FY 2019-2023: • Expand Northeast WRF to 6.0 MGD MMDF • Expand Southeast WRF to 4.0 MGD MMDF 2 Wastewater Collection and Transmission FY 2004-2008: • Complete the North- South transmission systems interconnections • Improve pumping station capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 • Improve transmission force main capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 • Construct two master pump stations • Continue to rehabilitate pumping stations and collection systems • Complete inflow and infiltration studies for the wastewater collection systems in the North and South Service Areas and implement recommended repairs • Complete installation of telemetry to all existing pumping stations FY 2009-2013: • Construct regional interconnections to the Northeast and East Central Service Areas and new master pumping stations 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update 13 May 25,2004 . !, • • Continue to rehabilitate pumping stations and collection systems • Provide wastewater service to Orange Tree • Improve pumping station capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 • Improve transmission force main capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 FY 2014-2018: • Construct regional interconnection from the South Service Area to the Southeast Service Area and associated master pumping station • Continue to rehabilitate pumping stations and collection systems • Improve pumping station capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 • Improve transmission force main capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 FY 2019-2023: • Continue to rehabilitate pumping stations and collection systems • Improve pumping station capacities as described in Sections 7 and 8 • Improve transmission force main capacities as described in Sections 7 and8 3 Biosolids FY 2004-2008: • Implement biosolids management program 4 Reclaimed Water FY 2004-2008: • Complete Reclaimed Water Master Plan • Add reclaimed water transmission pipelines to improve system capacity, pressure and reliability • Add reclaimed water pumping station to enhance flow transfer capacities between the NCWRF and SCWRF. • Add additional customers as sufficient irrigation water is available • Begin construction of ASR reclaimed water wells • Coordinate implementation of Regional Irrigation Distribution System (RIDS)with SFWMD • Complete FDEP requirements for Eagle Lakes Nature Interpretive Center FY 2009-2013: • Continue transmission system improvements and construction of ASR reclaimed water wells • Continue development of supplemental irrigation water sources • Implement recommendations made in the Reclaimed Water Master Plan 5 General FY 2004-2008: • Construct new Public Utilities Operations Center n 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update 14 May 25,2004 • Develop an on-site treatment plan to determine whether to extend service to areas served by septic tanks or if other on-site treatment enhancement programs should be implemented • Develop improved Concurrency Management System • Develop asset management system and conduct a CMOM self- evaluation in anticipation of upcoming regulations • Implement recommendations made in Reclaimed Water Master Plan Ongoing • Update the wastewater master plan and impact fee and rate analyses • Continue to expand SCADA and GIS systems to focus on using these technologies as reliability measurement tools 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update 15 May 25,2004 EXHIBIT 7 triggered by a road construction project, as much as by a need for the pipeline to meet an immediate transmission system demand. The timing for new treatment and water supply facilities will be triggered by the demand of growth and development. The time required from incipient planning to completion of construction is about eight years. Water demand and potential future regional water treatment facilities are as follows: Chart 1-5 Required Water Treatment Facility Capacities to Meet Future Water Demand Required Capacity by Year(MGD) Water Treatment Plant 2004 2013 2023 NCRWTP 20.0 20.0 20.0 SCRWTP 12.0 32.0 32.0 Northeast WTP 0 10.0 20.0 Southeast WTP 0 0 20.0 Totals 32.0 62.0 92.0 1.7 Conclusions The vision for management of water in Collier County is established in this 2003 Water Master Plan Update. Elements of the recommended plan include the following, listed by 5-year planning periods: 1. Water Supply FY 2004-2008: • Complete 8 MGD SCRWTP raw water wells • Identify sites, purchase property, design, permit and construct new wellfields for expansion of the SCRWTP to 20 MGD. • Identify site,purchase property, design, and permit a new wellfield for new the NERWTP. • Prepare study for the Golden Gate Tamiami wellfield pumping station reliability capacity improvements and construct improvements. • Add additional RO wells at the North Hawthorn Wellfield to improve reliability capacity at the NCRWTP. • Continue Lower Hawthorn and Lower Tamiami well replacement program to improve water supply system reliability capacity. • Conduct Mid Hawthorn well testing to determine feasibility of supplying raw water to RO process at NCRWTP. • Feasibility study to optimize use of Tamiami Water • Identif_y sites and purchase property for the new wellfield for the future SERWTP. 2003 Water Master Plan Update 15 May 25,2004 EXHIBIT 8 1 R 25 E I R 26 E I R 27 E I FIGURE 7-3 a —N— II • i I3 1 -Mrw ;.t a II' 1 4,,!1•,,, _ .� --,- .__ I n vYy• j---2008 73156 9 / PROPOSED � r ' ®i.w. a 1 I z, / NEWRF Y�,Smf.•':'W- �r K __ ' it ... VI oa f "'-- toy �. . _ __. _ E. • . �,�t -t------- — x' ) 3 . J1 3 ; .7:.'• ...,gam 4_S 1,N _ _ t. ••-r �'-m '- {{ 11 f..''. 1 , 2012.WW12 KL ¢' ..o. '� �- �`` - , • , PROPOSED ' ••-°'-aaFr •Lv.,AL. O.��A.. ' ECWRF .1-. _- 3 - -"--•• ,�-q�, _ .-t-7-.tea":. ._,.T C g, .:,.� :� I •. ---- • 4' L„� � F t,r.,-v T'i _ f,, F r N2. --,r u w 9,3 r t 'f d , 1 a \ d. 1.....___........ ....--_ 2015.VH113`, LEGEND PROPOSED COY OF TABLES 4. - - „ SERRICE NKAFIRM � \ wve SERVICE NKA J i,1 i t.....11. .. i. Yom” /[iYAM NUNN*:STATOR • \I\ _ ....2r 3( }�u ,,,'` WATER REDu„ETIDN F,a.T� �'� f a,s:: �,, N N NORM CONNIT INCAWFI t,' i ".b'- Sp/TN COUNTY q Sew ,, N, SOT. © E ms..-`.T{' 4y I a� •,,,,�`a N COSTING FFORCE WIN ^--ORCE WAN 3;``\,'� 1 t • _ FUTURE 1 I MOM WWHDNFtN _ I 1 LOU. ATER-SEMEA T 1� �\1 . S • R/CT BOUNDARY PRIOR TO 2003 COSNDS - RI .f ” jam/;0,, 1"`_— / 1 _ \. ORANGE TREE TRr.:.•- '•• '7 S i. %f/''•'ti. �c --- EMU - '.\' __..11 =MEW' PS J- -4. • J�,,�`^-• W`y / _ , OhMEM BV 30050 _ )/ •�, r-.� 1 1 , �COYNExOEp PS , _ RO2YFM m 2023 :/ kQ ``-rnr- 9 F C.• NMRE COUNTY .6. - I. RE01OxIA WRF A �` ` '� •S`S.:.?"'-' d: N (SOURCE:FY2003 WASTEWATER WS.PUN UPDATE) fA. 2 \\ ?' '�,�•-•-'-M2':', t w NOTES: 1. SOURCE a COSTING �-kyr'l / }; `",mo i Y r ft) SISTER 1W: CDR NI54NFA N •. , i— ^t .�---e''..,... � S,l. 2. ERE'2005•SNOWY FACILITY '. I'- RECWYENDED IN NEM F VE YEARS .7" " w• -_-�`•S._.--_ ,••••,,, 1 ERE•2023•SNOW%MUTT • C • /� RECONNENOED 20W-2023. c , (' �� t . AN I V N — } COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT $ PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2003 WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN UPDATE 1 GREELEY AND NANSEN LLE: MAY 2004 R 25 E I R 26 E I R 27 E EXHIBIT 9 , FILE.F1G7-3-W 1.1 03/05/04 10.05 06-E I R 25 E I R 26 E I R 27 E I FIGURE 7-3 ,....., s, 2, v u 2:, 1111 ---L---_ 27 '3 23 30 27 44' , .22 I ,,X NORTHEAST ' 1 ' I AREA I_--L--_---1-- - - --I 1 — , ' 1 :2 , ii..$., ,, .> . . . , , , , , 6 , i ' 2 I • PROPOSED ;'t *,...----r- -NI___.‘ I.022,i NERWTP I. mkr - r--- ------I----Il ' ----FT,, ' 4. -9 i - 6' -0' : I, ' ' 1 ''' I - I ''1_ **9 _QBANE- _ , 1 TREE 1 1' 4 - '' i r i .-,, . x --.'-1 ! ',) ,-. 1111 = n_4._, ,,t— 23 I a c" 1 , I - 1 ..„ • -,z NcRwrp 16 „ . , i , 13, 3' 1 r. . Es___ _ .-•- i 6 --7 t-4 . ' i i ' I IMI S I ' 4 ! ! s..-., 11 2 23 2 644 - - 2VA'1.1. - •=14=-'-=' - --* 1111 2 '''' 4111111 / 01 . 1 1;4'4 1 I! 7 41'.MIN ' ' 4 * 2 8 • ,,...t', t . 4 , f.), ,:-.. !,.. E -_i 1.,_ 4............r....---1 EAST CtNTRAL , 0 it if 11 ',...,' ,' 1 -"' 1\ . ., .... rffeilr3Rit44,4 ' ' - '4 1 ; 1 A'RE -1 .0 ,‘i 21 I 23 I 21 I- I'4--* . ,tx.' ,;$..*ft-t- -:-.1 Ai ._‘4.,t,-.i xtf.,!:tlse-e- ; - ., 9 I CITY OF '_.. 4, lt• NIIIII '""-'116"7/191-11a In ' NAPLES -----r. 1110.1111,61 1 ' . . I . 1 -. 1 M 1 . I fl 20164E,,____ an_sizal:11_,:ml!Mlift-:--...-_-___ '''' • -` ' ' _, ‘><, --) ' .' Ilik 11(" . , 1 ' 0 :--C As, ' 7- - - , ' S -L--! Nt. ,_ , i__ _ coLuER_coukry 2 t \ ::" • , . _:, : ,..,-, :, ,':,..-.., - 'WATER-SEWER DISTRICT' ' •jr, ' %,. ' 1 , "-- \ k i ' \' `• I-4; . _ 1 , 1, J•.;‘, r • 1 --... 1 --. 1 ,1 't-ttt--1('----H-7--T-- ' r— / rSOU TH AST I — -.... . LEGEND ‘j.,t. t CPI ,.. ,,,,, . "4„ —,..i----I—--•-t;:-,-..2,-. _..1___ EXISTING WATER TREATMENT PLANT all to t, •?-1„..., , ' J 1 • PROPOSED WATER ‘ ,, -- ",t 'v- -/- I . I t %,,: -r _, 1 TREATMENT PLANT ‘7. * i---,r .--!' 'I 1 :-, I 2 ' , 3' • AREA SERVED Z7, , COUNTY WATER I Or- ,1,4-' , 1 5 , : 1 .,, --' •7""1 ,_ , , -rW,,-• •-)1, - 1 I CITY OF NAPLES - V,`," "-- I 7'-'---*----±-----' / : , \ , 1 AREA SERVED BY F7 -':, . Z. . , „,, ,- ‘, ,, . 1 x , , 4 I •.. 4., I 14'' CITY OF NAPLES ' -1 ,-',NAPLES -.- , ,. . 1 1 \- - 1 FOUA -i',' , .--" — . .- •! 1 ' 4- - — - -1 .''011. 3 SERVICE AREA [K\21 11! -i L---- '''' • „...._.t.,..;.,, ! COLLIEFI\ 1 , ! ORANGE TREE 1 1.'•,-L,217 „ , 1,, 1;----,—_ , sEHINOLE! 1.7-....P.,."'"7-..-,q '' 1-----'• ' ---'z--',,:- -STATE- ' I SERVICE AREA J ,..„, 7 2. c.,2-_,.., , ...,- . PARK GOLDEN GATE ' e-' . % ,. _ ESTATES ..'_-;•• 1,!.- . .`- .1' ' p WATER-SEWER DISTRICT BOUNDARY I.'2.I. ” • ) , s,- 01,.,1:---.'.., , I i ' ('' ; , ' DISTRICT BOUNDARY —-'"' ... 1-,. -2"-'' -'-'. -7----- '-- I . PRIOR TO 2003 -2:11' -7 ; - . ..,(„90.0 I LAND ..p.o, 0 t-,,WA DIS 2 (SOURCE: FY2003 WATER MASTER PLAN UPDATE) ; .-1. '. -1:--, ' i'1 ..-,L_ 1 , - :-- MARCO ISLAND 1 ...-..c,u,-i ' -...' 114- -, 16-,- , ,,,- -„\-----, , -. ,.. , WATER AND 'F--, ,--- - 9 I?-- - - .- -.- ,..-----.--- 0 10000 20000 SEWER DISTRICT-- :4.2 -I- •-•:' '-' : ' ' ^''•!'l_'.. . ;--' ', _ SCALE IN FEET EXISTING AND FUTURE '....1 WATER SERVICE AREAS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT — PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2003 WATER MASTER PLAN UPDATE CIIREELEY AND HANSEN LLC MAY 2004 I ROSE I ROSE I 6276 I EXHIBIT 10 TR - 2 COLLIER COUNTY 2025 LONG RANGE NEEDS PLAN „I<N:':1'.-, Ail 411 v” 0‘2'' e Ir ___la 4,,, it m \ LEE eOONfY LINE A Bo '"y=', Rd CO o. \� l CR 858 y'i immokalee Rd 1 --4 C 03 r . ... 1. . L .B N .. rbUt,.-:r i. o " L112 Pine RidA. ge =. M n r is 41 n Golaen Gate Pk NI C y ppic Rd ivZ - nay.;21,,o 41 , _llu. I 7 ` - �e 1 e Ha �'c y. 'tr ,.;t a§ A. :V d stitm N C a lEr ra 2- Lanes �? �asf I ,4 - Lanes '\\‘'''.• ' j 6- Lanes ` •�... ' ' 8 - Lanes r+-� I Interchanges 4c-P,,__-,..,,. a l Ell Water Bodies .,,-i �, -, Interstate Highway ,7-`1------10'.','.; r- 1 Roads '''''',,t X':' 0 US Highway �� . County Boundary t - fry >I; � 2 0 2 4 Mlles c '° c4f,nV� 4 .�qq r . . HOLE MONTES EXHIBIT 13 ENGINEERS•PLANNERS•SURVEYORS '�"N 950 Encore Way•Naples,Florida 34110•Phone:239.254.2000•Fax:239.254.2097 August 11, 2004 Revised September 23, 2004 Ms. Michele Mosca,AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Department COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: CP-2004.4, TDR Density Bonus HM File No.:2004.100 Dear Ms. Mosca: Based on your letter dated July 14, 2004 regarding CP-2004.4 to create an incentivized environmental density bonus for TDRs, please note the following: 1. The petition cover letter analysis is referenced in Section IV E of the application per your request. 2. On page 2 of the April 23, 2004 submittal letter(revised August 11, 2004) attached hereto a reference has been made to the cover letter that the acres of sending and receiving lands were provided by County staff 3. On page 2 herein an assumption is made that one half of the total potential transferable units (9,000)would be available for transfer. There is no empirical data to support this assumption. The actual number of property owners opting to use the program may be higher or lower. Using 50% is considered to be a reasonable assumption. Based on our conversations, other population assumptions are also incorporated into the analysis, i.e., assuming 100% single family, 100%multi-family, and a 50/50 split between single and multi-family units for 4500 and 2250 dwelling units. 4. I.D. information has now been provided in the application. Robert Duane AICP was the principal author of the document. Support documentation was also provided by Tim Hancock AICP and Bruce Anderson, attorney at law with the law firm of Roetzel and Andress. 5. Disclosure of interest information is now provided for the Florida Wildlife Federation. 6. Where there is no exhibit for a particular item the item is now listed as not applicable. 7. An 8 1/2 x 11 Future Land Use Map is provided as Exhibit V B 1. H:\2004\2004100\MM040923 Revised Impact analysis letter from MN.docl Naples•Fort Myers•Venice Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 2 CATEGORY A- PUBLIC FACILITIES ANALYSIS The following analysis evaluates the facility impacts on wastewater, potable water,trip generation, solid waste, parks,recreation facilities and drainage facilities. The four scenarios are set forth as follows: A. Development Scenarios 1. Scenario One is the existing 93,000 acre study area for the Agricultural /Fringe Mixed Use Sub District that allows one dwelling unit per five acres or+/- 18,600 dwelling units. 2. Scenario Two assumes 9000 additional single family TDR units will be added to the study area with the proposed TDR bonuses, representing the high range. 3. Scenario Three assumes 4500 dwelling units will be added to the study area with the proposed TDR bonuses,representing the mid range. 4. Scenario Four assumes 2250 dwelling units will be added to the study area with the proposed TDR bonuses, representing the low range. B. Population Assumptions County staff has requested that population for the study area be evaluated as follows: 1. Assume 100% of the new bonus units will be single family units, based on a population of 2.66 persons per dwelling unit. 2. Assume 100% of the new bonus units will be multi-family units based on a population of 2.52 persons per dwelling unit. 3. Assume that 50%of the new bonus units will be single family and 50% will be multi-family for an average population of 2.59 persons per dwelling unit. The following are the resultant population ranges for the study area for scenarios One through Four, with Scenario One being the assumed build-out density of the 93,000 acre Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. This build-out is based on a density of one dwelling unit per five acres, or a build-out population of 18,600 dwelling units, with±4500 of the±9000 TDRs currently • Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 3 allowed by the Growth Management Plan(GMP) being transferred. Further density bonuses were not assumed for the study area. 1. Scenario One Population for 18,600 dwelling units: A. Single family= 18,600 dwelling units x 2.62 persons per dwelling unit= 48,732 population. B. Multi-family= 18,600 dwelling units x 2.52 persons per dwelling unit= 46,872 population. C. 50% Single family= 9,300 dwelling units x 2.62 persons per dwelling unit=24,366 population plus 50%Multi-family= 9,300 dwelling units x 2.52 persons per dwelling unit=23,436 population=47,802 population total. The population range is 46,872 to 48,732 persons. r-. 2. Scenario Two Population for 18,600 +9,000=27,600 dwelling units: A. Single family=27,600 dwelling units x 2.62 persons per dwelling unit= 72,312 population. B. Multi-family=27,600 dwelling units x 2.52 persons per dwelling unit= 69,552 population. C. 50% Single family= 13,800 dwelling units x 2.62 persons per dwelling unit= 36,156 population plus 50%Multi-family= 13,800 dwelling units x 2.52 persons per dwelling unit= 34,776 population= 70,932 population total. The population range is 69,552 to 72,312 persons. 3. Scenario Three Population for 18,600+4,500=23,100 dwelling units: A. Single family=23,100 dwelling units x 2.62 persons per dwelling unit= 60,522 population. B. Multi-family=23,100 dwelling units x 2.52 persons per dwelling unit= 58,212 population. Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 4 C. 50% Single family= 11,550 dwelling units x 2.62 persons per dwelling unit=30,261 population plus 50%Multi-family= 11,550 dwelling units x 2.52 persons per dwelling unit=29,106 population=59,367 population total. The population range is 58,212 to 60,522 persons. 4. Scenario Four Population for 18,600+2,250 =20,850 dwelling units: A. Single family=20,850 dwelling units x 2.62 persons per dwelling unit= 54,627 population. B. Multi-family=20,850 dwelling units x 2.52 persons per dwelling unit= 52,542 population. C. 50% Single family= 10,425 dwelling units x 2.62 persons per dwelling unit=27,314 population plus 50%Multi-family= 10,425 dwelling units x 2.52 persons per dwelling unit=26,271 population= 53,585 population total. The population range is 52,542 to 54,627 persons. Population Summary Scenario One Scenario Two Scenario Three Scenario Four A 48,732 72,312 60,522 54,627 B 46,872 69,552 58,212 52,542 C 47,802 70,932 59,367 53,585 IMPACT ANALYSIS Potable Water The Capital Improvement Element(CIE) assumes a service level standard of 185 gallons per capita per day. This analysis assumes that all dwelling units are provided central water supply. . Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 5 Scenario One Scenario Two A 48,732 x 185 =9.02 MGD 72,312 x 185 = 13.38 MGD B 46,872 x 185 = 8.67 MGD 69,552 x 185 = 12.87 MGD C 47,802 x 185 = 8.84 MGD 70,932 x 185 = 13.12 MGD Scenario Three Scenario Four A 60,522 x 185 = 11.20 MGD 54,627 x 185 = 10.11 MGD B 58,212 x 185 = 10.77 MGD 52,542 x 185 =9.72 MGD C 59,367 x 185 = 10.98 MGD 53,585 x 185 =9.91 MGD Waste Water The CIE assumes a service level standard of 100 gallons per capita per day for the South Sewer Service area and 145 gallons per capita per day for the North Sewer Service area. The 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update for the Rural Fringe Area assumed a flow rate of 120 gallons per day capita for the proposed Northeast,East Central and Southeast plants. See attached Table B-1 from the 2003 Wastewater Master Plan Update (Exhibit 1, herein). This analysis assumes that all dwelling units are provided central wastewater service. Scenario One Scenario Two A 48,732 x 120= 5.85 MGD 72,312 x 120= 8.68 MGD B 46,872 x 120= 5.62 MGD 69,552 x 120= 8.35 MGD C 47,802 x 120= 5.74 MGD 70,932 x 120= 8.51 MGD Scenario Three Scenario Four A 60,522 x 120= 7.26 MGD 54,627 x 120= 6.56 MGD B 58,212 x 120=6.99 MGD 52,542 x 120= 6.31 MGD C 59,367 x 120=7.12 MGD 53,585 x 120= 6.43 MGD Trip Generation Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 6 The 6th Edition of trip generation ITE for land use 210, detached single family residential, assumes a trip rate of 9.57 trips per unit for a weekday. For land use 230, residential condominium/townhouses, the average rate is 5.86 trips per day. Scenario One Scenario Two A 18,600 s.f. x 9.57 = 178,002 27,600 s.f. x 9.57 =264,132 B 18,600 m.f. x 5.86 = 108,996 27,600 m.f. x 5.86= 161,736 9,300 s.f. x 9.57= 89,001 plus 13,800 s.f. x 9.57 = 132,066 plus C 9,300 m.f. x 5.86 =54,498 = 13,800 m.f. x 5.86 = 80,868 = 143,499 total 212,934 total Scenario Three Scenario Four A 23,100 s.f. x 9.57 =221,067 20,850 s.f. x 9.57= 199,535 ^ B 23,100 m.f. x 5.86= 135,366 20,850 m.f. x 5.86= 122,181 11,550 s.f. x 9.57= 110,534 plus 10,425 s.f. x 9.57 =99,767 plus C 11,550 m.f. x 5.86 =67,683 = 10,425 m.f. x 5.86=61,091 = 178,217 total 160,858 total Parks and Recreation Facilities The CIE sets a service Level Standard of 2.94 acres of Regional Parks per 1000 population and 1.29 acres of Community Parks per 1000 population. Scenario One Regional Parks Community Parks A. 48.732 x 2.94= 143.27 acres A. 48.732 x 1.29= 62.86 acres B. 46.872 x 2.94= 137.80 acres B. 46.872 x 1.29= 60.46 acres C. 47.802 x 2.94= 140.54 acres C. 47.802 x 1.29 = 61.66 acres �.� Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 7 Scenario Two Regional Parks Community Parks A. 72.312 x 2.94=212.60 acres A. 72.312 x 1.29=93.28 acres B. 69.552 x 2.94=202.86 acres B. 69.552 x 1.29= 89.72 acres C. 70.932 x 2.94=208.54 acres C. 70.932 x 1.29 =91.50 acres Scenario Three Regional Parks Community Parks A. 60.522 x 2.94= 177.93 acres A. 60.522 x 1.29=78.07 acres B. 58.212x2.94= 171.14 acres B. 58.212x1.29 =75.09 acres ,..� C. 59.367 x 2.94 = 174.54 acres C. 59.367 x 1.29=76.58 acres Scenario Four Regional Parks Community Parks A. 54.627 x 2.94 = 160.60 acres A. 54.627 x 1.29=70.47 acres B. 52.542 x 2.94 = 154.47 acres B. 52.542 x 1.29=67.78 acres C. 53.585 x 2.94= 157054 acres C. 53.585 x 1.29=69.12 acres Under the above scenarios there is an increased demand for both community and Regional parks under Scenarios Two through Four. A location map is attached, depicting existing community, regional and some neighborhood parks as Exhibit 2. An inventory of park sites is attached as Exhibit 3 and further data pertaining to park sites is contained in the AUIR report. Solid Waste The levels of service standards for solid waste are as follows: A. Annual weight of solid waste used to determine landfill disposal capacity is based on the average of the last five complete fiscal years actual lined cell tonnage activity. Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 8 B. Two years of constructed lined landfill cell capacity at the disposal rate calculated per the above level A. C. Ten years of permitted landfill capacity at the disposal rate calculated per the above level A. The landfill is currently in compliance with the adopted levels of service standards noted above. While the foregoing service level for the landfill does not differentiate between uses, this analysis uses some surrogate measures to demonstrate the impacts on landfill usage with the revised development parameters. According to Larry Berg of Collier County Waste Management, a multi-family unit generates 0.9 tons (1,800 pounds) of solid waste per year. This translates into a disposal rate of approximately 35 pounds per week per unit. Single-family dwelling units generate an average of 45 to 50 pounds per week, or 1.2 tons per year. Scenario One Scenario Two A 18,600 s.f. x 1.2 TPY=22,320 27,600 s.f. x 1.2 TPY= 33,120 B 18,600 m.f. x .9 TPY= 16,740 27,600 m.f. x .9 TPY=24,840 9,300 s.f. x 1.2 TPY= 11,160 plus 13,800 s.f. x 1.2 TPY= 16,560 plus C 9,300 m.f. x .9 TPY= 8,370= 13,800 m.f. x .9 TPY= 12.420= 19,530 total 28,980 total Scenario Three Scenario Four A 23,100 s.f. x 1.2 TPY=27,720 20,850 s.f. x 1.2 TPY=25,020 B 23,100 m.f. x .9 TPY=20,790 20,850 m.f. x .9 TPY= 18,765 11,550 s.f. x 1.2 TPY= 13,860 plus 10,425 s.f. x 1.2 TPY= 12,510 plus C 11,550 m.f. x .9 TPY= 10,395 = 10,425 m.f. x .9 TPY=9,383 = 24,255 total 21,893 total Surface Water Management The service level for drainage facilities, according to the Drainage Sub-element of the GMP is based a storm event of 3-day duration and a 25-year return frequency. This standard shall be required for whatever level of development proceeds to take place in the Agriculture/Rural Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 9 Fringe Mixed Use District. Therefore,the impacts on service levels are not particularly germane to the issue, except that more storm-water management areas will likely be required for Scenarios Two, Three and Four. Facility Analysis 1. Background The majority of the land area in the Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District is presently vacant and much of the needed infrastructure still needs to be extended into the Rural Fringe areas. This existing condition somewhat complicates the analysis of impacts of increased population levels on existing and planned infrastructure for the Rural Fringe. Be that as it may,the worst case scenario for the high range population projection is Scenario Two A that proposes to add 9000 single family units to the single family units assumed to be allowed by the GMP for Scenario One A, and these impacts are set forth in Table 1 below. TABLE 1 -HIGH RANGE Scenario One A Scenario Two A Difference Population 48,732 72,312 23,580 1 Potable Water 9.02 MGD 13.38 MGD 4.36 MGD 2 Waste Water 5.85 MGD 8.68 MGD 2.83 MGD 3 Trips 178,002 264,132 86,130 4 Regional Parks 143 Acres 213 Acres 70 Acres 5 Community Parks 63Acres 93 Acres 30 Acres 6 Solid Waste 22,320 TPY 33,120 TPY 10,800 TPY 7 Storm Water 3 day/25 yr More Retention N.A. Storm Area The mid range projections are set forth in Table 2 below and compares Scenario One C with Scenario 3C that assumes 4,500 additional dwelling units with 50% single family and 50% multi-family units. The data provided in this report will allow any number of scenarios to be generated or combinations thereof. ,.-. Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 10 TABLE 2-MID RANGE Scenario One C Scenario Three C Difference Population 47,802 59,367 11,565 1 Potable Water 8.84 MGD 10.98 MGD 2.14 MGD 2 Waste Water 5.74 MGD 7.12 MGD 1.38 MGD 3 Trips 143,499 178,217 34,718 4 Regional Parks 141 Acres 175 Acres 34 Acres 5 Community Parks 62 Acres 77 Acres 15 Acres 6 Solid Waste 19,530 TPY 24,255 TPY 4,725 TPY 7 Storm Water 3 day/25 yr More Retention N.A. Storm Area In summary,the resulting impacts between a comparison of Scenarios One C and Three C (the mid-range) is considerably less than for Scenarios One A and Two A(the high range) as would be expected. The following Table 3 compares the high range and mid range impacts. TABLE 3 HIGH and MID RANGES High Range Mid Range Population 69,552—72,312 58,212—60,522 1 Potable Water 12.87— 13.38 MGD 10.77— 11.20 MGD 2 Waste Water 8.35 —8.68 MGD 6.99—7.26 MGD 3 Trips 161,736—264,132 135,366—221,067 4 Regional Parks 203 - 213 Acres 171 - 178 Acres 5 Community Parks 90 - 93 Acres 75 - 78 Acres 6 Solid Waste 24,840—33,120 TPY 20,790—27,720 PPD 7 Storm Water 3 day/25 yr Storm More Retention Area 2. Impacts on Category A Facilities Exhibits 6 and 7,respectively, include excerpts from the 2003 Waste Water Master Plan Update Final Report dated May 25, 2004, and the 2003 Water Master Plan Update Final Report dated May 25, 2004. A. Waste Water Waste water service is proposed to be extended into the Rural Fringe and three new r•, sewage treatment plants are proposed to provide for this service. Attached is Exhibit 8, a map of the sewer service area depicting the proposed plants for the Northeast Area,the • �-. Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 11 East Central Area and the Southeast Area. According to page 13 of the 2003 Waste Water Plan, attached as Exhibit 6,the total Waste Capacity for those plants will be increased to 16 MGD by 2023,and include 4 MGD for the southeast plant, 6 MGD for the northeast plant and 6 MGD for the east central plant. Based on the high range projection, and going back to Table 1, Scenario Two A,there is a demand for 8.6 million gallons per day of waste water treatment, or an increase in demand of 2.83 MGD compared to a capacity for 16 MGD. Under the mid-range projection the difference is 1.38 MGD in increased impacts to waste water plants. Therefore, impacts to waste water plants can be accommodated by either high or mid- range projections. It is worthy to note that the population for the waste water service areas for the Rural Fringe Area was based on a population of 44,400 people as noted in Table B-1 of the 2003 Waste Water Management Plan attached as Exhibit 1,and an additional population of 11,500 are included for the unsewered portion of Golden Gate Estates for a total population of 55,900 people to be served by the three plants in the Rural Fringe Area. The demand for waste water facilities is 8-2 MGD according to Table B-1. This build- out projection is less than the population forecasts contained in this report,but does not include provisions for density bonuses such as rural villages that may or may not materialize. In summary, for the population projected for this GMP Amendment,the waste water treatment plants proposed for the Rural Fringe will be sufficient to provide for the build- out projections contained in this report. It furthermore appears that waste water plants may be over-sized. This over-sizing of plants in the Rural Fringe may have been designed to accommodate urban waste water flows should the need arise. B. Potable Water Potable water is proposed to be extended into the Rural Fringe area with the construction of North East Water Plant that will initially be constructed to provide a service of 10 MGD by 2004 - 2008 and be expanded to 20 MGD by 2014 -2018. A map of the existing and future water service areas from the 2003 Water Master Plan is provided herein as Exhibit 9. The proposed water improvements are outlined in the summary of recommendations on pages 98 - 101 of the 2003 Water Master Plan and are included herein'as Exhibit 7. These proposed improvements are sufficient to accommodOe the build-out projections contained in this report that are estimated to require 9.02— 13.38 �"� MGD for the high-range projection and 8.84— 10.98 MGD for the mid-range projections. • r-� Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 12 Similar to the 2003 plan for waste water,the 2003 Water Master Plan Update was based on a population of 55,997 persons that included portions of Golden Gate Estates. See Exhibit 14, Table 5-5 Population and Water Demand Projections: Rural Fringe Areas. The annual average daily water demand projected was 10.35 million gallons of water per day. The source of the population projections was the Collier County Planning Department. In summary,the build-out projections contained in this report can be readily accommodated with the proposed improvements to the water plants to service the population for the Rural Fringe Area. C. Land Fill According to the AUIR report, solid waste facilities are currently adequate and $37,375,000 is budgeted for the 2004 - 2008 CIE to expand the landfill. Improvements are planned as follows: �-. F.Y. 2004 Additional 2,500,000 ton capacity at landfill resulting from new cell construction F.Y. 2009 Additional 2,500,000 ton capacity at landfill resulting from new construction to the C & D areas F.Y. 2014 Additional 2,500,000 ton capacity at landfill resulting from new construction in lower cell 1 and 2 areas F.Y. 2018 Additional 1,800,000 ton capacity at landfill resulting from final phase construction The AUIR goes on to note that in fiscal year 2022, two years of landfill capacity will remain before closing the landfill. Plans at that time will need to be developed to accommodate existing and planned population growth and to maintain ten years of permitted landfill capacity. In summary,the increased demand for additional landfill area based on high and mid range projections is in the order of magnitude of 25,000 to 40,000 tons per year, or 5 to 8 % of the annualized(500,000 ton capacity)planned improvements. �-. Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 13 D. Trip Generation Traffic impacts are problematic to predict over such a large study area, with much confidence, as County staff agrees. Therefore, a trip generation analysis was prepared for the various scenarios and traffic generation will increase, for example, by 161,736— 264,132 new trips under the high-range projection and by 135,366—221,067 new trips under the mid-range projection. Concurrency Management provisions of the GMP and LDC will require that sufficient service levels be maintained throughout the study area for each of the affected roadways. (See Exhibit 10, Map of Existing and Planned Roadways from the GMP) The standard level of service (LOS) for roadways is indicated below: Arterial and collector roads on the basis of peak hour traffic volume designated LOS "E" Airport-Pulling Road from Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway from Airport-Pulling Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Goodlette-Frank Road from Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road from Golden Gate Parkway to US 41 Pine Ridge Road from US 41 to Logan Boulevard US 41 from Collier Boulevard to Old US 41 Airport-Pulling Road from US 41 to Golden Gate Parkway Airport-Pulling Road from Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road Davis Boulevard from US 41 Road to Airport-Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway from US 41 to Airport-Pulling Road Livingston Road from Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Road Vanderbilt Beach Road from US 41 to Gulfshore Drive All other County and State (not on the FIHS) arterial and collector roads LOS "D". I-75 rural area LOS "B"; I-75 urbanized area LOS "C". In summary, existing and planned transportation facilities designed to maintain the above service levels, combined with concurrency management provisions of the GMP and LDC can be designed to accommodate the proposed population/trip generation for the build- out of the study area based on future planning studies. A map of the Collier County Long Range Financially Feasible Plan is attached. The population projections by TAZ zone, upon which transportation facilities are to be based, is currently being undertaken by the Transportation Services Division using the 2000 Census. At the time of the preparation Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 14 of this report,this reassessment is a work in progress and is not yet available for general distribution. E. Parks and Recreation Facilities According to the 2003 AUIR Report,regional and community parks on a County-wide basis are currently adequate. However, by the year 2013 there is a deficiency of 246 acres for regional parks. For community parks there is a surplus of 95 acres available on a County-wide basis by 2013. The Parks and Recreation Open Space Plan is proposed to be updated in the year 2010, according to Policy 3.1 of the of the Recreation and Open Space Plan,to provide for both active and passive recreational needs within a 15 to 20 minute driving time for the population to be served. Recreation-facility needs will be further evaluated at that time. It should be noted that parks and recreation facilities located outside the Rural Fringe area will also provide service to the Rural Fringe area. It is beyond the scope of this analysis to incorporate this level of detail in the analysis other than to note that the proposed plan amendment under the high range will require 70 more acres of Regional Parks and 30 acres more of Community Parks. Under the mid range projection, there is a need for 34 acres of Additional Regional Parks and 15 acres of Community Parks. It should be noted that should any appreciable number of parcels have their development rights severed as a result of this proposed GMP amendment, additional lands would be added to the public domain for passive recreation that could offset the needs for additional park lands. CONCLUSION Based on the results of the foregoing analysis impacts on Class A,public facilities are not significant but they are greater than would result from implementation of the current GMP provisions for the Rural Fringe Area. Sewer and water facilities appear to be more than adequate to accommodate build-out of the Rural Fringe Area. Other Class A public facilities can be upgraded between the present time and build-out of the Rural Fringe Area to readily accommodate the increased population growth resulting from this GMP Amendment. Information prepared by Tim Hancock was provided with the initial submittal that demonstrated there was a demand for additional TDRs, particularly to implement the incentive for Rural Villages. This and other support documentation contained in this Plan Amendment application demonstrates that the proposed bonuses are warranted. Furthermore,they will result in additional incentives for stewardship of the land, environmental conservation and encourage • �-•. Ms. Michele Mosca Collier County Government HM File No.: 2004.100 September 23, 2004 Page 15 more compact development patterns. Also please note that Exhibit V B 1 has been revised to clarify that the proposed amendment also applies to the North Belle Meade overlay provisions of the GMP. Sincerely, HOLE MONTES,INC. 6) )/(-- 1 ‘)t/tAY% -CI Robert L. Duane, A.I.C.P. Planning Director RLD/mmn �-. c: David Ellis Tom Taylor Bruce Anderson,Esq. Nancy Payton Bradley Cornell Thomas W. Reese, Esq. EAC Meeting December 1 , 2004 Collier County Future Land Use Map FSA's, HSA's & WRA's will be added to the RLSA Overlay Area The map is too large to scan, but can be found: Board's Minutes and Records Dept. 4th Floor, Building F 3299 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida EXHIBIT 14 "di\ TABLE 5-5 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2003 WATER MASTER PLAN UPDATE Population and Water Demand Projections: Rural Fringe Areas Greeley and Hansen LLC May 2004 ANNUAL PERCENTAGE OF BUILDOUT AVERAGE RURAL FRINGE AREA TOTAL RURAL FRINGE DAILY WATER RECEIVING LANDS t POPULATION 2 DEMAND (MGD)3 NORTHEAST 50, 22,235 4.11 EAST CENTRAL 25 11,117 2.05 SOUTHEAST 25 11,117 2.05 Subtotal 100 44,469 8.21 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL ACREAGE4 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AREA BETWEEN ORANGE TREE AND 50 11,528 2.13 AREA C 5 Total 55,997 10.35 Notes: 1. Percentages based on map inspection. 2. Buildout Population of 44,469 for Rural Fringe Area from Collier County Planning Services Department 3. Water demand calculated using 185 GPCD. 4. Total Acreage of Golden Gate Estates(inside and outside Water-Sewer District Boundary)= 22554 5. Based on 0.44 DU per acre(1 DU per each 2.25 acres) (Source: FY 2003 Water Master Plan Update) /"\ Section 5 Tables Page 1 of I May 2004