EAC Minutes 06/01/1988 MEMORANDUM
TO: EAC Members
FROM: Dr. Edward Proffitt
DATE: June 9, 1988
RE: June 1, 1988 EAC Minutes
The minutes for the June 1, 1988 Environmental Advisory Council were not
prepared in time for the mailing of materials for the June 15, 1988 EAC
meeting.
Copies of the minutes should be available at the meeting.
EP/emw
r
r
MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
DATE: June 1, 1988
TIME: 8 : 45 A.M.
PLACE: 3rd Floor Boardroom, Building "F" , Collier County
Government Center , Naples, Florida
EAC STAFF PRESENT
CARDILLO X PROFFITT X
BELOW ABS STEVENS X
BENEDICT ABS EDWARDS X
KURGIS X SCHEFF X
SNYDER X
MINUTES: Taken by Ellie Hoffman and transcribed by Dalila
Mendez , Deputy Clerks
CALLED TO ORDER AT: 8: 45 A.M. ADJOURNED: 9 : 50 A.M
PRESIDING: John P. Cardillo, Chairman
ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA: None
/"N Page 1
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
AGENDA •
June 1, 1988
8:45 A.M.
I. ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
III. ADDENDA -
IV. STAFF REPORTS
A. PETITIONS ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED BY NRMD
1. Petition PDA-88-4C; Thomas T. Crandall, of Collier
County Utilities Division, representing the Board of
County Commissioners, EX-Officio the Governing Board of
Collier County Water-Sewer District; requesting a PUD
Amendment to "Foxfire" PUD, Section VI, Tract D, Fire
Station site.
V. OLD BUSINESS
A. R-87-23C; Dr. Neno J. Spagna of Florida Urban Institute,
Inc. , representing Hubschman Associates; requesting a zoning
change from E to PUD Edenwood. Continued at petitioner's
request.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PU-88-9C; Q. Grady Minor of Q. Grady Minor & Associates. ,
P.A. , representing Hubschman & Associates; requesting a
provisional use "b" of A-2 for Earth mining.
B. PDA-88-5C; Alan D. Reynolds, AICP, of Wilson, Miller, Barton
Soll, & Peek, Inc. , representing Leisure Technology of
Florida, Inc. ; requesting a PUD amendment to Bretonne Park.
C. PDA-87-11C; Charles E. Turner of Westinghouse Communities of
Naples, Inc. , representing Westinghouse Communities of Naples,
Inc. , requesting a PUD Amendment to Pelican Bay PUD..
D. STD-88-12C; Shell Western E & P Inc. ; requesting a special
treatment permit for 40. 2 miles of seismic lines through
various unnamed wetlands in the Area of Critical State Concern
just North of Big Cypress National Preserve.
VII. NEW BUSINESS Note: Mr. Snyder filed a conflict of interest form
regarding this petition, therefore, there was
VIII. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA not a quorum and the petition was not heard.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
X. WORKSHOP
************************************************************************
NOTES:
•
A. Notify the Natural Resources Management Department (774-8454) no
later than 5 P.M. on Monday, May 30, 1988, if you cannot
attend this meeting or if you will have conflict and thus will
abstain from voting on a particular petition.
B. Please refer to notice on first floor, Building F, for the
location of the E.A.C. meeting.
C. Items added after agenda was sent out.
D. No action since last Council meeting.
E. On January 7, 1987 the E.A.C. adopted a policy that any person
addressing the E.A.C. on behalf of any organization must present a
letter from said organization acknowledging them as a representative
empowered to make policy related comments on that subject. -'
********** ********** ********** ********** **********
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A
RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO
ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD
INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
**;k******* ********** ********** ********** **********
************************************************************************
EAC Agenda Form
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1988
ITEM: Approval of minutes of May 18, 1988
MOTION: Made by Ms. Kurgis to approve the minutes of May
18, 1988 as presented. Seconded by Dr. Snyder.
Carried 3/0.
PETITION NO. R-87-23C Dr . Neno J. Spagna of Florida Urban
Institute, Inc. , representing Hubschman
Associates; requesting a zoning change from "E"
to PUD Edenwood.
COMMENTS: Continued at petitioner ' s request.
PETITION NO. PU-88-9C
FILED BY/FOR: Hubschman & Associates
REQUESTING: Provisional Use "b" of A-2 for Earth Mining.
REPRESENTED BY: Q. Grady Minor & Associates
COMMENTS: Mr . Q. Grady Minor described the proposed area
as a 141 acre parcel located north of U. S.
41; the parcel contains an existing 55 acre
farm field, the remaining 86 acres of the
site is vegetated mostly with pine (Pinus
elliotti var densa) and cajeput (Melaleuca
quinquenervia) canopy. There are two small
cypress impacted areas within the area, one is
0 . 41 acres, and the other is 0 . 49 acre. He said
that they have agreed to let Staff field inspect
these two areas and based on Staff ' s findings,
they will preserve the areas and include them in
the water retention system, clear them and miti-
gate their loss.
Mr . Edwards advised that there is an existing
farm field; the remaining 86 acres is dominated
by slash pine; melaleuca canopy is quite dense
in several areas forming a monocultural stands .
The understory is dominated by brazilian pepper
and wax myrtle, scattered individuals of salt
bush and remnant bald cypress and the ground
cover is dominated by sedge and graminoid spe-
cies. He said that NRMD will survey the areas
and, if the areas are viable wetland areas,
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1988
will mark these areas prior to any clearing
activity. The irrigation pond and detention
lake are located mostly within the existing
farm field and the 5 . 4 acre detention lake, is
part of the 8 . 8 acre detention area, and is
located entirely in the farm field. Three-
quarters of the irrigation is located in the
existing farm field and the remaining northern
quarter would be located in an area of slash
pine melaleuca graminoid vegetation.
Mr . Edwards stated that Staff recommends appro-
val of subject to the following stipulations:
1 . Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance 75-21
(or the tree/vegetation removal ordinance in
existence at the time of permitting) ,
requiring the acquisition of a tree removal
permit prior to any land clearing. A site
clearing plan shall be submitted to the
Natural Resources Management Department for
their review and subject to approval prior to
any work on the site. This plan may be sub-
mitted in phases to coincide with the develop-
ment schedule. The site clearing plan shall
clearly depict how the final site layout
incorporates retained native vegetation to the
maximum extent possible and how roads,
buildings, lakes, parking lots, and other
facilities have been oriented to accommodate
this goal .
2. Native species shall be utilized, where
available, to the maximum extent possible in
the site landscaping design. A landscaping
plan will be submitted to the Natural
Resources Management Department and the
Community Development Division for their
review and subject to their approval. This
plan will depict the incorporation of native
species and their mix with other species, if
any. The goal of site landscaping shall be
the re-creation of native vegetation and habi-
tat characteristics lost on the site during
construction or due to past activities.
3 . All exotic plants, as defined in the County
Code, shall be removed during each phase of
construction from development areas, open
space areas, and preserve areas. Following
Page 3
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1988
site development, a maintenance program shall
be implemented to prevent reinvasion of the
site by such exotic species. This plan, which
will describe control techniques and inspec-
tion intervals, shall be filed with and sub-
ject to approval by the Natural Resources
Management Department and the Community
Development Division.
4 . If, during the course of site clearing, exca-
vation, or other constructional activities, an
archaeological or historical site, artifact,
or other indicator is discovered, all develop-
ment at that location shall be immediately
stopped and the Natural Resources Management
Department notified. Development will be
suspended for a sufficient length of time to
enable the Natural Resources Management
Department or a designated consultant to
assess the find and determine the proper
course of action in regard to its salvageabi-
lity. The Natural Resources Management
Department will respond to any such notifica-
tion in a timely and efficient manner so as to
provide only a minimal interruption to any
constructional activities .
5 . The two cypress areas will be surveyed by
NRMD, prior to issuance of a notice of commen-
cement. If deemed preservable, the areas
shall be preserved ad incorporated into the
water management system. If, however , NRMD
allows the two areas by planting an equal
sized area in the detention area. Native
littoral species shall be planted and a proper
maintenance program (removal of invading exo-
tics) instituted.
Dr . Snyder asked if most agriculture activi-
ties used irrigations ponds or is water taken
directly from the ground. Mr . Grady advised
that most do not and noted that in this case
they wanted a pond for the following reasons:
one is to try to get some normal water from
the pond in the winter and another reason is
to save on wells.
Ms . Kurgis asked if there was a technical
description for earth mining, is farming
included and moving of soil. Mr . Proffitt
Page 4
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1988
noted that this process is called excavation.
Mr . Grady advised that some of the lakes would
be excavated and use some of the material will
be used for berm around the project to create
water management system and the remaining fill
will be hauled off-site. Mr . Cardill asked
of the 141 acres involved how much of it would
be proposed for mining. Mr . Grady explained
that the irrigation pond and contigent pond
totaled 11 acres and the rest of it will be at
the existing ground elevation and bermed up to
approximately six feet above ground level .
MOTION: Made by Ms. Kurgis to recommend approval of
PU-88-9C, subject to the above stipulations.
Seconded by Mr. Snyder. Carried 3/0.
******
PETITION NO. PDA-88-5C
FILED BY/FOR: Alan D. Reynolds, AICP, of Wilson, Miller ,
Barton Soll, representing Leisure Technology
of Florida, Inc.
REQUESTING: A PUD amendment to Bretonne Park.
COMMENTS: Mr . Alan Reynolds stated that this is a
request for a PUD amendment to the previously
approved Brettone Park located on Davis Blvd.
He then advised that also present were Cliff
Snyder and Consulting Biologist Kevin Irwin.
He noted that Mr . Irwin had spent a great deal
of time with Staff and had done an environmen-
tal analysis.
Mr . Irwin gave a brief summary of the project.
He referred to an aerial photograph which was
taken earlier this year and also stated that
the previous plan did not include the golf
course. He noted that The Natural Resources
Management report details a breakdown of
acreages on the site and of the upland pre-
serve area. He then clarified that there is
not a decrease in upland preserve. He said
an additional 13 acres of uplands was acquired
which would not be impacted. Also, there are
approximately 60 acres of uplands preserved on
site; another important factor is the control
Page 5
•
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1988
of melaleuca across the site. He said that
the site has various uses and the upland pre-
serve area will connect two wetland areas on
the northeast portion of the site and proceed
to the southwestern portion of the site. He
noted that the Natural Resources Management
Department made recommendations for the pro-
ject.
Ms. Stevens stated that the changes include the
addition of a golf course; an increase in the
amount of lakes; and a decrease in residential
acreage. She noted that a utility maintenance
area would also be added. Shealso noted that
Natural Resources Director Proffitt has three
main concerns for the proposed changes: the
detrimental effect of golf course run-off on
water quality in the lake; the extent of tree
clearing proposed for the golf course, and ade-
quate buffering of the wetland preserve.
Approval was recommended subject to the four
standard stipulations and stipulations from ori-
ginal Staff report for Brettone Park, with the
exception of Stipulation 11, of that report,
which is no longer relevant. She then explained
that there would be open space areas incor-
porated into the golf course. Additional stipu-
lations recommended for this amendment petition
require that adequate buffered areas be included
in the flagging of wetland preserve, the need
of vegetation in golf course rough areas be
maintained and water and sediment quality moni-
toring program be undertaken in three of the
project ' s lakes. She stated that the plan was
environmentally better than the original plan
for Brettone Park.
Ms . Kurgis asked if Ms. Stevens was correct in
stating that there would be a decrease in resi-
dential acres? Mr . Reynolds responded that in
the land use summary the tabulation of acres is
devoted to land use and there are fewer acres on
site devoted to residential land use since there
are more acres that are devoted to recreation
and open space.
Ms . Kurgis then asked the difference between
R-1 and R-2 to which Mr . Reynolds responded
that R-1 was for single-family type uses and R-2
was for multi-family type uses . He continued by
Page 6
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1988
stating that it was now like a zero lot line
patio home; there was a change in the type of
product from the original Brettone Park.
The original had a more conventional type
multi-family whereas this project has a
higher ratio of single-family uses. He noted
that the type product being included was being
done with less acres and the density remained
the same.
Dr . Snyder referred to the environmental sec-
tion under endangered plants and asked if the
examples listed were random examples or actual
plants present at the site? It is a relati-
vely open canopy area with many cypress and
melauleca covering the area. Dr . Snyder then
asked if there were any red woodpeckers on
site and Mr . Erwin responded that there are
red-cockaded woodpeckers and the area will be
surveyed along with the project.
MOTION: Made by Dr. Snyder to recommend approval of
Petition PDA-88-5C with the stipulations
included by Staff' s report. Seconded by Ms.
Kurgis. Carried 3/0.
1. Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance 75-21
(or the tree/vegetation removal ordinance in
existence at the time of permitting) , requiring
the acquisition of a tree removal permit prior
to any land clearing. A site clearing plan
shall be submitted to the Natural Resources
Management Department for their review and
subject to approval prior to any work on the
site. This plan may be submitted in phases to
coincide with the development schedule. The
site clearing plan shall clearly depict how the
final site layout incorporates retained native
vegetation to the maximum extent possible and
how roads, buildings, lakes, parking lots, and
other facilities have been oriented to accom-
modate this goal.
2. Native species shall be utilized, where
available, to the maximum extent possible in the
site landscaping design. A landscaping plan
will be submitted to the Natural Resources
Management Department and the Community
Development Division for their review and sub-
ject to their approval . This plan will depict
Page 7
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1988
the incorporation of native species and their
mix with other species, if any. The goal of
site landscaping shall be the re-creation of
native vegetation and habitat characteristics
lost on the site during construction or due to
past activities.
3 . All exotic plants, as defined in the County Code,
shall be removed during each phase of construc-
tion from development areas , open space areas,
and preserve areas. Following site development,
a maintenance program shall be implemented to
prevent reinvasion of the site by such exotic
species. This plan, which will describe control
techniques and inspection intervals, shall be
filed with and subject to approval by the
Natural Resources Management Department and the
Community Development Division.
4 . If, during the course of site clearing, excava-
tion, or other constructional activities, an
archaeological or historical site, artifact, or
other indicator is discovered, all development
at that location shall be immediately stopped
and the Natural Resources Management Department
notified. Development will be suspended for a
�-e sufficient length of time to enable the Natural
Resources Management Department or a designated
consultant to assess the find and determine the
proper course of action in regard to its salva-
geability. The Natural Resources Management
Department will respond to any such notification
in a timely and efficient manner so as to pro-
vide only a minimal interruption to any
constructional activities.
5 . Littoral zones along lake margins should be at a
side slope ratio of no less than 4 : 1 out to a
depth of three feet from mean low water levels .
6 . Water management designs should promote storm
water runoff being channeled to and retained
within wetland preserves .
7. Petitioner will be subject to Ordinance 75-21 (or
the tree/vegetation removal ordinance in
existence at the time of permitting) , requiring
the acquisition of a tree removal permit prior
to any land clearing.
Page 8
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1988
8 . Under the threat of destruction due to develop-
ment, all protected plant species must be
transplanted in undisturbed, preserve areas or
areas subject to the approval of NRMD. Plants
will be recognized as protected if listed in the
"Official Lists of Endangered and Potentially
Endangered Fauna and Flora of Florida" (compiled
by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission) or any other County, state, or
federal lists that are officially recognized
for the protection of plant and/or animal spe-
cies. Plant species to be transplanted include
but are not limited to the following: creeping
orchid (Habenaria repens, butterfly orchid
(Encydia tampensis) , twisted air plant
(Tillandsia flexuosa) , golden poilypody fern
(Phlebodium aureum) . All transplantings must
be performed by qualified personnel subject to
approval by NRMD.
9 . All specimens of the endangered cigar orchid
(Cyrtopodium punctatum) must be removed and
transplanted in areas subject to the approval
of NRMD. All transplanting must be by qualified
personnel subject to approval of NRMD.
.-� 10 . All four wetland areas shall lbe preserved, as
well as the oak hammock area found along the
northern boundary of the northeastern wetland
preserve. Prior to any development of
surrounding lands, the preserves shall be
flagged; flagging boundaries shall be verified
by NRMD.
11. Deleted.
12 . A survey shall be conducted to verify the pre-
sence or absence of the red-cockaded woodpecker
(Picoides borealis) . If wood-peckers are found
nesting with the parcel, the petitioner shall
allow sufficient habitat to satisfy nesting
requirements, and the petitioner shall satisfy
all County, state (Florida Game and Fresh Water
Fish Commission) and federal (U. S . Fish and
Wildlife Service) stipulations concerning the
woodpecker or any other protected plant/animal
species on site at the time of permitting.
13 . The petitioner should investigate a program to
reduce or prevent the growth of cattails (Typha
Page 9
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1988
latifolia) in the littoral shelf zone of lakes
to be constructed within the project. Petitioner
should consider vegetating at least portions of
littoral shelf zone with native species of
aquatic plants (NRMD would be pleased to provide
pertinent literature and/or suggested species) .
14 . For all the stipulations above mutual agreements
must be reached between NRMD and personnel of the
Bretonne Park development. If mutual agreements
cannot be reached, the matter will be brought
before the EAC or whatever County environmental
review board is in power at the time of disputes;
this governing entity will act as an arbitrator
for disputes. If arbitration is futile, the
matter will be brought before the Board of County
Commissioners who will act as the final arbitra-
tor .
PETITION NO. PDA-87-11-C
FILED BY/FOR: Westinghouse Communities of Naples, Inc.
REQUESTING: A PUD Amendment to Pelican Bay PUD.
REPRESENTED BY: Charles E. Turner of Westinghouse Communities
.-. of Naples , Inc.
COMMENTS: Mr . Charles Turner , Director of Planning,
Westinghouse Communities of Naples, Inc. ,
advised that the petition was a text change to
the Pelican Bay PUD to allow nine additional
golf holes to main facilities at Pelican Bay.
He stated that this would allow them to have
golf courses in certain residential areas in
Pelican Bay and the specific site plan would be
subject to approval by Collier County. He
said that the site specific aspect of this
proposal will follow; the amendment that they
are requesting is to adjust the text so that
the golf course would be permitted in case
they decided to add additional holes. He said
that Dr . Proffitt has requested a water quality
analysis; they have collected data through the
years on their run-off water quality and the
results of that analysis are included in the
agenda packet. Also, he said Dr . Rossler of
Tropical Biolndustries has assisted them in
this analysis and can now answer any technical
questions.
Page 10
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1988
Dr . Proffitt, however , observed that Mr . Turner
had summarized the request quite efficiently.
He stated that data was very seldom received
but in this case Pelican Bay had provided all
necessary data and Dr . Rossler has provided the
Board with data on a floppy disk that will aid
in reporting about development phases in Pelican
Bay. He then referred to Page 2 of the Staff
report where details of the findings are
outlined. He noted that it was fairly clear
that some of the areas were experiencing
nutrient loading.
Dr . Proffitt referred to the IF-3 and Mr . Turner
noted that there was a natural pond although
it was significantly enlarged. Dr . Proffitt
noted that Staff is recommending approval of
the petition with standard stipulations; also
that water quality monitoring continues; and
that pesticides be explored.
Dr . Snyder referred to the introductory
remarks and stated that he was not certain on
what the board was approving. He noted that
this petition was not actually to put in a
golf course, but to allow for an additional
'-` golf course in the future which could be sub-
ject to change. He recommended that the board
make Stipulation #7 to see the plan when
completed for review.
MOTION: Made by Ms. Kurgis to recommend Approval of
Petition PDA-87-11-C with standard stipulations
1 through 6 as indicated on the Staff report
and with the addition of Stipulation #7 .
Seconded by Dr. Snyder.
1 . Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance 75-21
(or the tree/vegetation removal ordinance in
existence at the time of permitting) , requiring
the acquisition of a tree removal permit prior
to any land clearing. A site clearing plan
shall be submitted to the Natural Resources
Management Department for their review and sub-
ject to approval prior to any work on the site.
This plan may be submitted in phases to coincide
with the development schedule. The site
clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final
site layout incorporates retained native vegeta-
tion to the maximum extent possible and how
Page 11
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1988
roads, buildings, lakes, parking lots, and other
facilities have been oriented to accommodate
this goal .
2. Native species shall be utilized, where
available, to the maximum extent possible in
the site landscaping design. A landscaping
plan will be submitted to the Natural
Resources Management Department and the
Community Development Division for their
review and subject to their approval. This
plan will depict the incorporation of native
species and their mix with other species, if
any. The goal of site landscaping shall be
the re-creation of native vegetation and habi-
tat characteristics lost on the site during
construction or due to past activities .
3 . All exotic plants, as defined in the County
Code, shall be removed during each phase of
construction from development areas, open
space areas, and preserve areas. Following
site development, a maintenance program shall
be implemented to prevent reinvasion of the
site by such exotic species. This plan, which
l 1 will describe control techniques and inspec-
tion intervals, shall be filed with and sub-
ject to approval by the Natural Resources
Management Department and the Community
Development Division.
4 . If, during the course of site clearing, exca-
vation, or other constructional activities, an
archaeological or historical site, artifact,
or other indicator is discovered, all develop-
ment at that location shall be immediately
stopped and the Natural Resources Management
Department notified. Development will be
suspended for a sufficient length of time to
enable the Natural Resources Management
Department or a designated consultant to
assess the find and determine the proper
course of action in regard to its salvageabi-
lity. The Natural Resources Management
Department will respond to any such notifica-
tion in a timely and efficient manner so as to
provide only a minimal interruption to any
constructional activities .
5 . Clearing in the rough areas of the golf course
will be held to the minimum amount practical
to retain as much native habitat as possible.
Page 12
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JUNE 1, 1988
6 . Water quality monitoring will continue.
However , staff recommends that Westinghouse
and PIBD explore with the regulatory agencies
the possibility of dropping certain autocorre-
lated parameters (and maybe adding some pesti-
cide or meteral monitoring. )
7. Final site plan to come back to the EAC for
approval in as much as Mr . Turner has agreed.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by
order of the Chair .
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
John P. Cardillo, Chairman
'II
Page 13
MEMORANDUM
TO: EAC Members
FROM: Kate Muldoon
DATE: June 10, 1988
RE: Revised wording for Standard Stipulation # 2
After consulting with County attorney, David Weigel, I am forwarding the
following version to you of Standard Stipulation # 2. Please consider
it the version which NRMD feels most appropriate.
VERSION III
Native species shall be utilized, where available, to the maximum extent
possible in the site landscaping design. A landscaping plan will be
submitted to the Community Development Division and the Natural
Resources Management Department for their review and subject to their
approval. This plan will depict the incorporation of native species and
their mix with other species, if any. The goal of site landscaping
shall be the re-creation of native vegetation and habitat
characteristics lost on the site during construction or due to past
activities. A landscape plan shall not be required for any such lot
zoned for or which will contain a single family residence and for which
the subsequent home owner shall implement the landscaping.
TO: EAC members
FROM: Kate Muldoon
DATE: June 15 , 1988
RE: Revised wording for Standard Stipulation # 2
VERSION I
Native species shall be utilized, where available, to the
maximum extent possible in the site landscaping design. A
landscaping plan will be submitted to the Community
Development Division and the Natural Resources Management
Department for their review and subject to their approval .
This plan will depict the incorporation of native species and
their mix with other species, if any. The goal of site
landscaping shall be the re-creation of native vegetation and
habitat characteristics lost on the site during construction
or due to past activites . Only lots zoned for or which shall
contain single family residences (zero - lot line homes,
etc. ) and which shall be landscaped by the subsequent home
owner shall be exempt from the requirement of submitting a
landscape plan.
VERSION II
Native species shall be utilized, where available, to the
maximum extent possible in the site landscaping design. A
landscaping plan will be submitted to the Community
Development Divison and the Natural Resources Management
Department for their review and subject to their approval.
This plan will depict the incorporation of native species and
their mix with other species, if any. The goal of site
landscaping shall be the re-creation of native vegetation and
habitat characteristics lost on the site during construction
or due to past activities. A landscape plan shall not be
required for lots zoned for or which contain single family
residences and for which the subsequent home owners shall
implement the landscaping.
UNDERLINED SECTIONS INDICATE WORDING THAT HAS BEEN ADDED.
Ft
,-. FORM
r 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT
LAST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE/ ,^ NAME /
S" ' V D�✓'( fVM 1c s �����1 THE BOARD,WHICH I ERVEOIS UNCIL,COM
OF;MISSION, AUTHORITY. OR COMMITTEE ON
ASAILING ADDRESS
3 l S Ll` S 1, S( 0 CITY COUNTY 0 OTHER LOCAL AGENCY 0 STATE
UTY COUNTY110Cicl (i
1 " /<<e J NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY
DATE ON W HIt H VOTE OCCURRED
6/ /7R�' (A /u') co .
NAME OF'BOARD,COUNCIL.COMMISSION,AUTHORITY.OR COMMITTEE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 4
This form is for use by any person serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee,
whether state or local,and it applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are faced with a'voting conflict of
interest.
• . As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers,this form is divided
into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards(municipal,county,special tax districts,etc.),while PART B is
prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level. --
PART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form rpust be filed. --
PART A
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
[Required by Section 112.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).]
The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM
VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from
knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal(other than a government
agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained.
In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict:
(a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is
abstaining from voting;and
1
(b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below.
NOTE:Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357,
Florida Statutes(Supp. 1984),or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre,one-vote basis are not prohibited from
voting. In such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made.
I, the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on . /t'-t / , 19 _ :
(a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one):
inured to my special private gain; or �7
inured to the special gain of N414 �'^ '� ��'(f S<r"J c 1 , by whom I am retained.
:E FORM 4-REV. IG.84 - PAGE
.(b) The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: +
( 41.u, „r�A u�,, 14- r , s (1 G.)t fie/ l� fi P •
•
•
•
l 1 c,
Date Filed } g
Si na ure
Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form. -
PART B
VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS
[Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes(Supp. 1984).] ,_ '-
Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However,.any state officer who votes in his official
capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom he is retained is required
to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs.
I, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on - , 19 ••
(a) I voted on a matter which (check one): --
inured to my special private gain; or -
inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retained.
-he measure on which 1 voted and the nature of my interes
in the measure is as follows:
Date Filed Signature
Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form.
PART C
FILING INSTRUCTIONS
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen(15)days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person
responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting,who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes.This form need not
be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict.
;OTI( 'DER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES*I11317(1983),A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTESGROUNDS FOR AND MAY
E PL .,HED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT.
'EMOTION.REDUCTION IN SALARY,REPRIMAND.OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED$5,000.
)RM 4-REV.1044 PAGE: