EAC Agenda 08/03/1988 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
AGENDA
August 3, 1988
8:45 A.M.
I. ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
III. ADDENDA
IV. STAFF REPORTS
A. PETITIONS ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED BY NRMD
V. OLD BUSINESS
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PU-88-5C: Mr. Richard B. Kepley of Shelter Island Joint
Venture, representing Bernard C. Johnson, Trustee; requesting a
provisional use "b & e" of RT for a restaurant and marina.
B. R-88-6C: Alan D. Reynolds, AICP of Wilson, Miller, Barton,
Soll & Peek, Inc. , representing Manufactured Housing
Associates, Inc. ; requesting a zoning change from A-2 & A-2
"ST" to PUD - Naples Golf Estates.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Revision of EAC Standard Stipulation No. 2.
VIII. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA
IX. ADJOURNMENT
X. WORKSHOP
************************************************************************
NOTES:
A. Notify the Natural Resources Management Department (774-8454) no
later than 5 P.M. on Monday, August 1, 1988, if you cannot
attend this meeting or if you will have conflict and thus will
abstain from voting on a particular petition.
B. Please refer to notice on first floor, Building F, for the
location of the E.A.C. meeting.
C. Items added after agenda was sent out.
D. No action since last Council meeting.
E. On January 7, 1987 the E.A.C. adopted a policy that any person
addressing the E.A.C. on behalf of any organization must present a
letter from said organization acknowledging them as a representative
empowered to make policy related comments on that subject.
********** ********** ********** ********** **********
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A
RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO
ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD
INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
********** ********** ********** ********** **********
************************************************************************
MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
DATE: July 6, 1988
TIME: 8 : 45 A.M.
PLACE: 3rd Floor Boardroom, Building "F" , Collier County
Government Center, Naples, Florida
EAC STAFF PRESENT
CARDILLO X PROFFITT X
BELOW X STEVENS X
BENEDICT ABS EDWARDS X
KURGIS X BURCH X
SNYDER X
MINUTES BY: Dalila Mendez, Deputy Clerk
CALLED TO ORDER AT: 8 : 45 A.M. ADJOURNED: 9 :35 A.M
PRESIDING : John P. Cardillo, Chairman
ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA: 1 . Item added by Mr. Cardillo re Dr .
Proffitt ' s resignation.
2 . Item added by Ms. Kurgis re an
article in the newspaper on Alligator
Alley.
I
Page 1
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
AGENDA
July 6, 1988
8:45 A.M.
I. ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
III. ADDENDA
IV. STAFF REPORTS
A. PETITIONS ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED BY NRMD
1. R-88-5C; Alan D. Reynolds of Wilson, Miller, Barton,
Soll, & Peek, Inc. , representing Show America Attractions,
Inc. ; requesting a zoning change from C-3 to C-5 for a
minature golf course.
2. PU-88-12C; Dr. Neno J. Spagna, Florida Urban Institute,
Inc. , representing The Shelter for Abused Women of Collier
County, Inc. , Barbara Widman, President; requesting a
provisional use "6.3) (f)" of RMF-6 for Shelter for Abused
Women of Collier County, Inc.
3. R-88-12C; William E. & Mary Ellen Stroble; requesting a
zoning change form GC to RSF-3 for a single family
residence.
4. PDA-88-6C; Joseph S. Boggs of Bruce Green & Assoc. , Inc. ,
representing Carl M. Fernstrom, Trustee; requesting a
PUD Amendment to Eastridge.
5. PU-88-14C; Bill Griffin, Collier County EMS; requesting
provisional use 8-10-B of Ordinance 82-2 for Essential
Service - EMS Substation.
V. OLD BUSINESS
A. R-87-23C; Dr. Neno J. Spagna of Florida Urban Institute,
Inc. , representing Hubschman Associates; requesting a zoning
change from E to PUD Edenwood. Continued at petitioner's
request.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PU-88-13C; Joseph S. Boggs of Bruce Green & Associates, Inc. ,
representing Celebrity Golf Development; requesting a
provisional use C of C-4 for a Miniature Golf Course.
B. R-88-11C; Dr. Neno J. Spagna of Florida Urban Institute Inc. ,
representing Anthony F. Jancigar; requesting a zoning change
A-2 & A-2 ST to PUD.
C. R-88-9C; Michael F. Stephen, Ph.D. of Coastal Engineering
Consultants, Inc. , representing Marina South, Inc. ; requesting
a zoning change from RMF-6 and MHRP to RO and PUD -- "South-
pointe Yacht Club".
VII. NEW BUSINESS
VIII. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA
IX. ADJOURNMENT
X. WORKSHOP
************************************************************************
NOTES:
A. Notify the Natural Resources Management Department (774-8454) no
later than 5 P.M. on Monday, July 4, 1988, if you cannot
attend this meeting or if you will have conflict and thus will
abstain from voting on a particular petition.
B. Please refer to notice on first floor, Building F, for the
location of the E.A.C. meeting.
C. Items added after agenda was sent out.
D. No action since last Council meeting.
E. On January 7, 1987 the E.A.C. adopted a policy that any person
addressing the E.A.C. on behalf of any organization must present a
letter from said organization acknowledging them as a representative
empowered to make policy related comments on that subject.
********** ********** ********** ********** **********
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A
RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO
ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD
INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
********** ********** ********** ********** **********
************************************************************************
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1988
ITEM: Minutes of June 1 , 1988 and June 15, 1988
MOTION: Made by Dr. Snyder to approve the minutes of
June 1 , 1988, with the corrections indicated
below and to approve the minutes of June 15,
1988, as presented. Seconded by Ms. Kurgis.
Carried 4/0.
Page 2 , 2nd paragraph from bottom, the words
"small cypress impacted areas" should read
"impacted cypress areas" , and the words "clear
them and mitigate their loss" should read "or
clear them of exotics and mitigate their loss" .
Page 6 , second paragraph, the words "Shealso"
should read "She also" .
*****
PETITION NO: PDA-88-6C, Joseph S. Boggs of Bruce Green &
Associates, Inc. representing Carl M. Fernstrom,
Trustee; requesting a PUD amendment to
Eastridge.
COMMENTS: In response to Ms. Kurgis, Mr. Edwards advised
that Ms. Muldoon had conducted a site visit to
the above mentioned site, and she had verified
that it is not a "cypress head" . He noted that
there was a mistake in the original PUD docu-
ment , and Ms. Muldoon agreed that the language
should be changed to "native vegetative area" ,
as per her memorandum dated May 6, 1988 .
*****
PETITION NO: R-88-11-C
FILED BY/FOR: Dr . Neno Spagna of Florida Urban Institute,
Inc . , representing Anthony F. Jancigar
REQUESTING: A zoning change from "A-2" & "A-2 ST" to "PUD"
for interchange-related commercial uses for 8 . 87
acres on the south side of Pine Ridge Road, west
of I-75 to be known as Pine Ridge Center West
PUD.
REPRESENTED BY: Dr . Neno Spagna
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1988
COMMENTS: Dr . Neno Spagna stated that both he and Mr.
Jancigar have read the staff 'report and concur
with it .
Ms. Stevens described the northwest corner of
the parcel as an ST overlay of the designated
A-2 zoning. She noted that the bordering road-
ways; Pine Ridge Road and Good Earth Drive, have
disrupted the historical water flow through this
ST area, resulting in considerable lowering of
the water table, and subsequent exotic invasion.
She noted that only scattered cypress remain in
the area; however, slash pines are becoming
established in the northwestern corner. She
also noted that outside the ST area, the habitat
of the northern half of the parcelconsists of a
predominance of shrub layer vegetation. She
stated that two or three former hedge rows cross
the property, and support a dense growth of saw
palmetto with gallberry, wax myrtle and small
cabbage palms . She noted that the southern half
of the parcel supports an open canopy of slash
pine with a scattering of small cypress with
4"-6" DBHs. She continued by stating that small
islands of palmetto make up the only shrub layer
vegetation in this area, with a groundcover
dominated by various grasses; some pennyroyal,
and St . John' s Wort .
Ms. Stevens advised that NRMD recommends appro-
val of petition R-88-11C, subject to the four
standard stipulations as well as two additional
stipulations.
In response to Mr. Below, Dr . Spagna said that
if any gopher tortoise were seen on site, he
would work in conjunction with the Florida Game
and Freshwater Fish Commission and the Natural
Resources Management Department to protect then.
Ms. Stevens advised that there is a stipulation
included in the recommendation to protect any
gopher tortoise .
Ms. Kurgis asked if the cypress would be in the
water retention area, to which Ms. Stevens
responded that a few of them would be.
MOTION: Made by Ms. Kurgis to recommend approval of Petition
R-88-11C subject to the stipulations indicated below.
Page 3
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1988
Seconded by Dr. Snyder. Carried 3/1. (Mr. Below
opposed) .
1 . Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance 75-21
(or the tree/vegetation removal ordinance in
existence at the time of permitting) , requiring
the acquisition of a tree removal permit prior
to any land clearing. A site clearing plan
shall be submitted to the Natural Resources
Management Department for their review and sub-
ject to approval prior to any work on the site.
This plan may be submitted in phases to coincide
with the development schedule. The site
clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final
site layout incorporates retained native vegeta-
tion to the maximum extent possible and how
roads, buildings, lakes, parking lots, and other
facilities have been oriented to accommodate
this. goal .
2 . Native species shall be utilized, where
available, to the maximum extent possible in the
site landscaping design. A landscaping plan
will be submitted to the Natural Resources
-� Management Department and the Community
Development Division for their review and sub-
ject to their approval . This plan will depict
the incorporation of native species and their
mix with other species, if any. The goal of
site landscaping shall be the re-creation of
native vegetation and habitat characteristics
lost on the site during construction or due to
past activities.
3 . All exotic plants, as defined in the County
Code , shall be removed during each phase of
construction from development areas, open space
areas, and preserve areas. Following site deve-
lopment , a maintenance program shall be imple- A
mented to prevent reinvasion of the site by such
exotic species. This plan, which will describe
control techniques and inspection intervals,
shall be filed with and subject to approval by
the Natural Resources Management Department and
the Community Development Division.
4. If , during the course of site clearing, excava-
tion, or other constructional activities, an
archaeological or historical site, artifact, or
Page 4
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1988
other indicator is discovered, all development
at that location shall be immediately stopped
and the Natural Resources Management Department
notified. Development will be suspended for a
sufficient length of time to enable the Natural
Resources Management Department or a designated
consultant to assess the find and determine the
proper course of action in regard to its salva-
geability. The Natural Resources Management
Department will respond to any such notification
in a timely and efficient manner so as to pro-
vide only a minimal interruption to any
constructional activities.
5 . The petitioner shall, where feasible, transplant
native shrub and tree species suph as wax
myrtle, dahoon holly, and cabbage palm, into
landscape areas of the development .
6 . The necessary procedures for gopher tortoise
relocation (Florida Game and Freshwater Fish
Commission) shall be followed in the event a
gopher tortoise is found on site.
*****
PETITION NO: R-87-23C
FILED BY/FOR: Dr. Neno Spagna of Florida Urban Institute,
Inc . , representing Hubschman Associates.
REQUESTING: A zoning change from "E" to "PUD" for Edenwood
REPRESENTED BY: Dr . Neno Spagna
COMMENTS: Ms . Stevens advised that it has been determined
that half this property falls under the juris-
diction of the Army Corps of Engineers and the/
project is now being reworked. Dr. Spagna
advised that he is no longer the agent for the
project and would provide a copy of a letter to
the Committee stating this. As a result , Mr.
Cardillo suggested that this item be taken off
the agenda.
*****
Page 5
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1988
PETITION NO: PU-88-13C
FILED BY/FOR: Joseph S . Boggs of Bruce Green & Associates,
Inc. representing Celebrity Golf Development
REQUESTING: A provisional use "C" of "C-4" for a miniature
golf course located south of the intersection of
U. S . 41 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road consisting
of 3 . 9 acres .
REPRESENTED BY: Joseph S. Boggs
COMMENTS: Mr . Joseph S . Boggs, representing the petitioner,
advised that he has walked the site with Mr.
Burch and agrees with the staff report. He
stated that he does not agree with staff ' s
recommendation regarding restoring the historic
water level in the remnant cypress habitat area.
He indicated that it would be impossible to
comply with this request , since this area is
proposed to be used in the project 's water
management plans. He noted that the site is
surrounded by drainage canals on two sides.
Mr . Burch confirmed the fact that there are
drainage canals on two sides and that the pro-
perty is surrounded by development. He noted
that the area was formerly a transitional
pine/cypress area forest but has recently become
stressed by the surrounding development. He
noted that the area is moderately invaded by
non-native species. He noted that further deve-
lopment will not be significant in this area and
recommends approval of the petition with the
understanding that the historic water level be
restored as part of the storm water management
designs for the project and that the native
epiphytes be relocated within the cypress pre-
serve areas.
In response to Mr. Cardillo, Mr. Boggs advised
that the sale of this property is contingent
upon acquiring a provisional use.
Mr . Below stated he did not see how the historic
water level could be restored and suggested that
Stipulation #5 be reworded. He noted that it
should state that "it should be designated as a
preserve area" in the PUD. Dr. Snyder
Page 6
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1988
expressed his views, and stated that it seems
that they are meeting the water management
requirements . Mr. Boggs, however, explained
that this area is the natural location for the
water management area. Dr. Snyder noted that
Stipulation #5 , should be re-worded the
following way: Storm water management designs
shall utilize the remnant cypress habitat
that is located in the northeastern corner of
the property as a water retention area; this area
shall be maintained as a preserve.
MOTION: Made by Mr. Below to recommend approval of Petition
PU-88-13C subject to the stipulations indicated below.
Seconded by Dr. Snyder. Carried 4/0.
1 . Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance 75-21
(or the tree/vegetation removal ordinance in
existence at the time of permitting) , requiring
the acquisition of a tree removal permit prior
to any land clearing. A site clearing plan
shall be submitted to the Natural Resources
Management Department for their review and sub-
ject to approval prior to any work on the site.
This plan may be submitted in phases to coincide
with the development schedule. The site
clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final
site layout incorporates retained native vegeta-
tion to the maximum extent possible and how
roads, buildings, lakes, parking lots, and other
facilities have been oriented to accommodate
this goal .
2 . Native species shall be utilized, where
available , to the maximum extent possible in the
site landscaping design. A landscaping plan
will be submitted to the Natural Resources
Management Department and the Community
Development Division for their review and sub-
ject to their approval . This plan will depict
the incorporation of native species and their
mix with other species, if any. The goal of
site landscaping shall be the re-creation of
native vegetation and habitat characteristics
lost on the site during construction or due to
past activities.
3 . All exotic plants, as defined in the County
Code, shall be removed during each phase of
Page 7
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1988
construction from development areas, open space
areas, and preserve areas. Following site deve-
lopment , a maintenance program shall be imple-
mented to prevent reinvasion of the site by such
exotic species. This plan, which will describe
control techniques and inspection intervals,
shall be filed with and subject to approval by
the Natural Resources Management Department and
the Community Development Division.
4 . If , during the course of site clearing, excava-
tion, or other constructional activities, an
archaeological or historical site, artifact, or
other indicator is discovered, all development
at that location shall be immediately stopped
and the Natural Resources Management Department
notified. Development will be suspended for a
sufficient length of time to enable the Natural
Resources Management Department or a designated
consultant to assess the find and determine the
proper course of action in regard to its salva-
geability. The Natural Resources Management
Department will respond to any such notification
in a timely and efficient manner so as to pro-
-- vide only a minimal interruption to any
constructional activities.
5 . Storm water management designs shall utilize the
remnant cypress habitat that is located in the
northeastern corner of the property as a water
retention area; this area shall be maintained as
a preserve .
6 . Native epiphytes, such as air plants (Tillandsia
spp. ) or orchids (any ephytic members in the
family Orchidaceae) that exist in trees which
must be cleared for development shall be relo-
cated into compatible host trees within the
cypress preserve area.
*****
PETITION NO. : R-88-9C
FILED BY/FOR: Dr. Michael F. Stephen of Coastal Engineering
Consultants, Inc . , representing Marina South,
Inc.
Page 8
- ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1988
REQUESTING: A zoning change from "RMF-6" and "MHRP" to "RO"
and "PUD" -- "Southpointe Yacht Club" .
REPRESENTED BY: Michael F. Stephen, Ph.D.
COMMENTS: Dr . Michael F. Stephen, stated that both the
petitioner and he are supportive of the staff
report, and agree with all the recommendations.
He noted that he would like to offer some alter-
nate language, however, for stipulation #6. He
noted that this stipulation states that "the
master plan shall be amended to specifically
prohibit on-site fuel facilities" . He said that
it would be more appropriate to actually include
the language pertaining to fuel facilities in
the PUD document itself . He referred to Section
4. 1 . 3 and noted that rather than excluding this
option where such services historically have
been available, he would propose that this
language be placed in the PUD document, and that
if at any time in the future fueling facilities
might be deemed appropriate at the site, there
should be a requirement that specific plans be
developed and presented to the NRMD and brought
back to the EAC . He noted that at the present
time, fuel facilities have not been given any
consideration, however, he would appreciate if
the language is included in the PUD document for
future use. Dr. Proffitt concurred that it
would be more appropriate to have a PUD amend-
ment to change the language.
Mr . Edwards noted that the upland area has been
heavily disturbed in the past due to the
existence of the fish camp and the latter chan-
nel excavation activities. He noted that the
area has a few canopy specimens consisting
mostly of scattered slash pine, cabbage palm and
australian pine. He noted that there are
three oak trees in the northern half of the
upland area. He noted that red mangroves grow
along the northern boundary of the property and
the banks of the northern channel . He noted
that scattered palmettos and brazilian peppers
constitute the understory layer along with
several brazilian peppers. He noted that the
majority of the vegetation is in the form of a
weedy groundcover species which includes grape
vine, coast sandspur, ragweed, railroad vine,
Page 9
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1988
dog fennel and assorted graminoids. He noted
that the small island in the 'boat basin is also
dominated by weedy groundcover species and is
lacking in any canopy or understory vegetation.
He stated that NRMD' s concern is with the water
and sediment quality of the area, and referred
to Figure 1 , Appendix 1 , which is the results of
the sediment chemical analyses of the boat
basin, both channels, and adjacent areas of
Naples Bay contiguous to the project site. He
noted that the tests specifically looked at con-
centrations of several heavy metals as well as
monitoring for the EPA' s 610 compounds. He
stated that Mr. Max Hatcher of the Collier
County Environmental Science and Pollution
Control Department reviewed the figures and
stated that all of the metals and the hydrocar-
bons were within limits set for clean water . He
noted that NRMD recommends approval of the peti-
tion, and reiterated that the uplands area have
been extensively disturbed. He stated, however,
that since there are several native canopy spe-
cies on site, they should be utilized in the
landscape plans. Mr. Edwards said that the
concern regarding the fuel facilities are
covered under stipulation #6. Mr. Stephen
agreed with Dr . Proffitt ' s previous recommen-
dation that a PUD amendment would be more
appropriate than a stipulation with regards to
fuel facilities. He suggested that stipulation
#6 should indicate that fuel facilities shall
only be allowed by PUD amendment , including con-
ceptual plans.
Dr . Stephen agreed with Dr. Snyder ' s statement
that a PUD amendment would be sufficient , but
explained that it would be beneficial to indi-
cate that specific plans would be required for
the fueling facilities.
Mr . Cardillo then repeated the new wording of
for Stipulation #6 , however, the words "shall be
allowed" were replaced with the following: it
will be allowed only by PUD amendment .
Responding to Mr . Below, Mr . Stephen expounded
that there are 72 boat docks within the County,
which will remain the same under the PUD. He
noted that there are approximately 12 - 15
Page 10
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1988
potential single-family lots that would be
allowable within the City to 'the west of the
PUD. Ms. Kurgis asked if this project has pre-
viously been before the Committee? Dr. Stephen
responded that this is a separate project , and
said that in 1982 they had appeared before the
Committee on a separate issue.
MOTION: Made by Ms. Kurgis to recommend approval of Petition
R-88-9C with the stipulations as indicated below.
Seconded by Dr. Snyder. Carried 4/0.
1 . Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance 75-21
(or the tree/vegetation removal ordinance in
existence at the time of permitting) , requiring
the acquisition of a tree removal permit prior
to any land clearing. A site clearing plan
shall be submitted to the Natural Resources
Management Department for their review and sub-
ject to approval prior to any work on the site.
This plan may be submitted in phases to coincide
with the development schedule. The site
clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final
site layout incorporates retained native vegeta-
--
tion to the maximum extent possible and how
roads, buildings, lakes, parking lots, and other
facilities have been oriented to accommodate
this goal .
2 . Native species shall be utilized, where
available, to the maximum extent possible in the
site landscaping design. A landscaping plan
will be submitted to the Natural Resources
Management Department and the Community
Development Division for their review and sub-
ject to their approval . This plan will depict
the incorporation of native species and their
mix with other species, if any. The goal of
site landscaping shall be the re-creation of '
native vegetation and habitat characteristics
lost on the site during construction or due to
past activities .
3 . All exotic plants, as defined in the County
Code, shall be removed during each phase of
construction from development areas, open space
areas, and preserve areas. Following site deve-
lopment , a maintenance program shall be imple-
mented to prevent reinvasion of the site by such
Page 11
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 6, 1988
exotic species. This plan, which will describe
control techniques and inspection intervals,
shall be filed with and subject to approval by
the Natural Resources Management Department and
the Community Development Division.
4. If , during the course of site clearing, excava-
tion, or other constructional activities, an
archaeological or historical site, artifact , or
other indicator is discovered, all development
at that location shall be immediately stopped
and the Natural Resources Management Department
notified. Development will be suspended for a
sufficient length of time to enable the Natural
Resources Management Department or a designated
consultant to assess the find and determine the
proper course of action in regard to its salva-
geability. The Natural Resources Management
Department will respond to any such notification
in a timely and efficient manner so as to pro-
vide only a minimal interruption to any
constructional activities.
5 . Petitioner shall utilize the existing native
canopy species in the landscaping plan. If
necessary, and where feasible, individual speci-
mens may be transplanted on site.
6 . Fuel facilities for the Yacht Club are not now
permitted, but in the event that they are
desired at some future date, they will be
allowed only by PUD amendment , including the
conceptual plans for the fueling facilities.
Approval by the EAC does not relieve the deve-
lopment from County, State and Federal permits
and/or authorizations that may be required.
*****
ITEM: Addenda
COMMENTS: Mr . Cardillo congratulated Dr. Proffitt on his
newly acquired position and wished him well in
all his future endeavors.
Ms. Kurgis indicated that there was an article
in the Naples Daily News regarding the construc-
tion of I-75 , the canals and the side slopes
Page 12
t
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 6 , 1988
along Alligator Alley and questioned what DOT is
doing regarding this matter, •to which Dr.
Proffitt advised that they will be checking the
side slopes to be sure that they are in
compliance with all requirements.
*****
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned
by Order of the Chair .
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
John P. Cardillo, Chairman
•
Page 13
MEMORANDUM
TO: All NRMD Staff
FROM: Kate Muldoon, yelopment Compliance Specialist
DATE: June 21, 1988
RE: Wording for PUD, rezone and provisional use stipulations
Please be advised that the Assistant County Attorney has judged that,
in order to stipulate that an area remain a Preserve, the wording should
state that "the area shall be a Preserve", rather than "the area shall
be preserved".
• -
A
`' �
/� ` '
-,,,
-
P.M
FOR: EAC Meeting 8/17/88 .•
FROM: Keith Edwards
.-: ";-7"._
Natural Resources Technician (....: ~�^
DATE: 12 August 1988
RE: Shelter Island Proposed Monitoring Program
_ ___________ ___________ _______ _____________ __
Further research and consultation with other county
departments and state and federal agencies has resulted in the
following rewording of stipulation #4, as pertaining to the
Shelter Island petition (PU-88 58) .
4. Petitioner shall implement a monitoring program to
determine the levels of heavy metals derived from the
decomposition of anti-fouling paint toxins and petroleum
byproducts in the sediments surrounding Shelter Island. The
�~� monitoring program will run for five years with the first set of
` tests to be performed prior to any construction activity,
therefore providing reference background values. Tests shall be
performed at least once a year. If deemed necessary, more
frequent testing shall occur if problems develop. At least five
sampling sites will be established in the southern bypass
channel , in close proximity to the proposed docks, with two
control sites established east of the project. Methods for
heavy metals will follow the procedures designed by the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA, 1982) , including the
modifications developed by DER for work performed in saline
environments (FDER, 1984) , for arsenic, cadmium, copper, and
mercury based on their relationship to natural aluminum
concentrations. Petitioner will use an acceptable method for
determining petroleum byproduct concentrations, such as the USEPA
610 gas chromatographic method. If no state or federal standards
exist for any of the parameters throughout the length of the
monitoring program, then the values derived from the pre-
construction samples will be used as the reference standards. If
a buildup of contaminants is noted, NRMD retains the right to
require additional testing. In addition, NRMD would require that
petitioner take appropriate actions to correct the problem.
These actions may include, but not be limited to: changes in the
marina operation, dependent on the parameter in question;
identification and removal of the boat (s) that may be causing the
problem; investigation of the surrounding marinas if off-site
e-. point sources are suspected. Annual reports shall be submitted
to NRMD for review and, if necessary, changes in the monitoring
program or corrective actions needed to arrest metal enhancement
will be implemented.
1
~
*"^N
LITERATURE CITED
FDER/ 0M. 1984. Deepwater ports maintenance dredging and
disposal manual . Florida Department o+ Environmental
Regulation, Tallahassee.
USEPA. 1982. Methods for chemical analysis o+ water and wastes.
EPA 6O0/4-79-O20. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati ,
Ohio.
cou'Nk
NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
EAC MEETING 8/03/88
Petition: PU-88-5C; Richard B. Kepley, of Shelter Island Joint
Venture, representing Bernard C. Johnson, Trustee of the Shelter
Island Trust ; requesting provisional uses b and e of the RT
zoning for a marina and restaurant .
Considerations:
The area under consideration is a semi-circular piece of
property roughly 5.7 acres in size. The parcel is the western
most half of an island situated in the Cocohatchee River just
east of Wiggins Pass . The site is bordered on the east by
e""\
Vanderbilt Drive (S. R. 901 ) and to the north , west , and south by
the Cocohatchee River . The Wiggins Pass Marina is on the
northern shoreline of the Cocohatchee while the Anchorage
condominium is located on the southern shoreline (R25E, T48S,
S17) . A site visit was conducted on March 28 by Keith Edwards
(NRMD) .
Petitioner proposes to construct a restaurant and marina on
site, as well as two fifteen story apartment buildings that are
permitted under the present zoning classification. The marina
plan calls for the establishment of a floating perimeter dock ,
measuring 6 ' x 1266 ' , with four 4 ' x 16 ' access ramps and forty
finger piers four feet in width with lengths ranging from 23 ' to
34 ' . The perimeter dock would run parallel to an existing
seawall , which runs along the northern, western, and southern
1
' .
r�~+
Staff Report
EAC Meeting 8/03/88
Page 2
shorelines, except at the northeast and southeast corners where
riprap revetment is present . Petitioner also proposes to
construct 1266 linear feet of riprap revetment at the toe of the
seawall , which would require 563 cubic yards of rock .
Shelter Island was originally a mangrove fringed deltaic
island . However , spoil material derived from the construction of
Vanderbilt Drive and the dredging of Wiggins Pass was deposited
on this site resulting in the present upland soils of a sand/
shell mixture. The upland vegetation denotes this impacted
condition, consisting of early successional , weedy, herbaceous
species. Dominant species include ragweed ( Ambrosia
artemisiifolia) , dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium ) , false
camphorweed (Heterotheca subaxillaris) , milkwort ( Polyqala
spp . ) and assorted graminoids. No shrub or canopy species occur
except around the existing sales trailer . These include three
cabbage palms (Sabal palmetto ) , three sea grapes (Coccoloba
uvifera) , and several coco plums (Chrysobalanus icaco) .
There is no vegetation occurring waterward of the seawall .
Moving further into the river from the seawall , the bottom
contour drops sharply into deep channels in the southern bypass
channel and northern main channel due to past dredging
activities . Again, little or no vegetation occurs in these
channels.
2
^
��
Staff Report
EAC Meeting 8/03/88
Page 3
Shelter Island is located within the Wiggins Pass/
Lower Cocohatchee ecosystem, a sensitive, estuarine system that
is utilized by several protected wildlife species including snook
(Centropomus undecimalis) and various wading birds. Due to this
situation, several aspects of the proposed development are of
concern to NRMD. Specifically, these concerns are: the effects
development and increased boat traffic would have on the
threatened and endangered species; the possible contamination of
the surrounding waters and sediments by leakage of petroleum
byproducts; the possible contamination of the same waters and
sediments by decomposition of anti-fouling paint toxins , whose
input into the area may be increased since boats docked at the
marina would have to remain in the water at all times. In order
to answer these concerns, petitioner was required to submit an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) .
The Wiggins Pass/ Lower Cocohatchee estuarine system provides
valuable nursery and feeding habitat for sport and commercial
finfish and shellfish species. The extensive mangrove fringe
forests, submerged grass beds, oyster beds, and sand flats west
of Shelter Island are also the feeding and breeding grounds for
several threatened and endangered species, such as the American
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) , West Indian Manatee
(Trichechus manatus) , and Least Tern ( Sterna albifrons ) . A
Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) report on Shelter
3
Staff Report
EAC Meeting 8/03/88
Page 4
Island from July 1985 noted numerous least tern sightings and
nesting activity . The NRMD site visit found no evidence of least
tern activity, possibly due to the time of year that the visit
took place. However , least tern absence was further confirmed by
Mr . Charles Shumway, then-representative for Shelter Island , who
stated that no least terns had been seen on the island since
1986. Due to this change in the least tern status, NRMD
required that the EIS specifically address these changes as a
follow-up to the DER study . Least terns nest in open, sandy
habitats, which were previously present on Shelter Island . Since
1985, the weedy herbaceous species have spread to cover the
entire island , eliminating any open areas. Thus, the loss of
nesting habitat probably caused the ensuing absence of least
terns. Manatees still utilize the estuarine system and would
possibly be affected by increased boat traffic in Wiggins Pass.
Therefore, appropriate precautions would have to be instituted by
the petitioner and boat-owning residents of the development in
order to lessen this impact . No eagle nests were located within
a 0.5 mile radius of the site. No deleterious effects should
occur to bald eagles by construction of this development .
Recommendations:
NRMD is most concerned with the effects that development and
increased boat traffic would have on the water and sediment
quality of the adjoining estuarine system, and on the wildlife
that utilize this system. DER expressed these same concerns in
4
Staff Report
EAC Meeting 8/03/88
Page 5
its 1985 report . Although no fuel facilities will be allowed on
site, as stipulated in the DER permit (#111000635) ( see Appendix
1 ) , any boats that anchor at the proposed marina would have to
remain in the water at all times, since dry storage is also
prohibited . This raises the possibility of contamination of the
surrounding waters and sediments by the decomposition of anti-
fouling paint toxins. Petitioner has agreed to a five-year
monitoring program to determine if contamination does occur .
Petitioner has also agreed to implement certain boating
precautions in the area so to protect the manatees from increased
boat traffic . DER has further stipulated that mitigative
�••.
planting of 18" mangroves, with an 8O% survival rate over a three
Year period , be conducted along the proposed riprap waterward of
the existing seawall . NRMD agrees with the DER stipulations and
adopts them as further NRMD stipulations.
Considering the previously stated points, NRMD recommends
approval of petition PU-88-5C with the following stipulations:
1-3. Standard stipulations 2-4 as adopted by the EAC on
4/ 1/87.
4. Petitioner shall implement a monitoring program to
determine the levels of petroleum byproducts and anti-
fouling paint toxins in the waters and sediments
e""N
surrounding Shelter Island . In addition, petitioner
shall monitor turbidity levels in the water column. This
5
Staff Report
EAC Meeting 8/03/88
Page 6
monitoring program shall run for five years with the
first tests being performed prior to commencement of any
construction activity. Water quality tests shall be
performed on a bimonthly basis with sediment tests
performed annually. Annual reports shall be submitted to
NRMD for review and approval . NRMD will retain the right
to require additional testing if a buildup of any of
these contaminants is noted .
5. NRMD agrees with and adopts the DER stipulations as
~�~ expressed in DER permit #111000635.
6. Petitioner shall install and maintain signs at the four
access ramps that are designed to inform, educate, and
warn boaters of shallow waters, environmentally sensitive
areas, and the possible presence of protected species;
information on protected species should include, but not
be limited to , the West Indian Manatee (Trichechus
manatus) and the American Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus) . The signs and their posting shall be
subject to the review and approval of NRMD.
Prepared by: �� �`~- Date: -�/ �-k^/ �� �"
Reviewed by: ~ / /=r'_-1'— ~ Date: ~
Ay. .;
111 -- �jam" -
STATE OF FLORIDA
Il
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
SOUTH FLORIDA �y�`<�
BRANCH OFFICE z, d BOB GRAHAM
GOVERNOR
7451 GOLF COURSE BOULEVARD
iii
PUNTA GORDA, FLORIDA 339549359 I'1�If ��►, P VICTORIA J.TSCHINKEL
IR `104,, SECRETARY
OF Rid
III
PERMITTEE: Charles Shumwa
Y PERMIT/CERTIFICATION
c/o William J. Johnson NO. 111000635
1250 Tamiami Trail North
Suite 203-B DATE OF ISSUE: August 12, 1986
Naples, Fl. 33940
IIIEXPIRATION DATE: July 31, 1989
.4►
COUNTY: Collier
1111. LATITUDE/LONGITUDE:
26° 16' 55" N
1111 81° 48' 10" W
SECTION/TOWNSHIP/RANGE:
III 17 48S 25E
PROJECT: Multi-family Docking
Facilities
1111
This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter(s) 403, Florida Statutes,
IIIand Florida Administrative Code Rule(s) 17-3, 17-4, and 17-12. The above named
permittee is hereby authorized to perform the work or operate the facility shown
on the application and approved drawings(s), plans, and other documents attached
III hereto or on file with the department and made a part hereof and specifically
described as follows:
11 Construct a floating perimeter dock measuring 6' x 1266' with four (4) 4' x 16'
access ramps and forty (40) finger piers 4' in width, lengths varying from 23' to
111 34' ; construct 1266 linear feet of riprap revetment at the toe of an existing
seawall, requiring the deposition of 563 cubic yards of rock; and plant mangrove
illseedlings in the revetment within the Cocohatchee River (Class III Waters), a
natural, navigable waterbody within Section 17, Township 48 South, Range 25 East,
Collier County.
TIIII
DER Form 17-1.201(5) Page 1 of 6
r-- Effective November 30, 1982
(:
•
PERMITTEE. Charles Shumway PERMIT/CERTIFICATION
c/o William J. Johnson NO. 111Q00635
1250 Tamiami Trail North
Suite 203-B DATE OF ISSUE: August 12, 1986
Naples, Fl. 33940
1111 EXPIRATION DATE: July 31, 1989
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1. The terms, conditions, requirements, limitations, and restrictions set
forth herein are "Permit Conditions" and as such are binding upon the
permittee and enforceable pursuant to the authority of Section 403.161,
403. 727, or 403.859 through 403.861, Florida Statutes. The permittee is
hereby placed on notice that the department will review this permit
periodically and may initiate enforcement action for any violation of the
"Permit Conditions" by the permittee, its agents, employees, servants or
1111 representatives.
2. This permit is valid only for the specific processes and operations
applied for and indicated in the approved drawings or exhibits. Any
1111 unauthorized deviation from the approved drawings, exhibits, specifications,
or conditions of this permit may constitute grounds for revocation and
enforcement action by the department.
3. As provided in Subsections 403.087(6) and 403.722(5), Florida Statutes,
the issuance of this permit does not convey any vested rights or any
1111 exclusive privileges. Nor does it authorize any injury to public or private
property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal,
state or local laws or regulations. This permit does not constitute a waiver
of or approval of any other department permit that may be required for other
aspects of the total project which are not addressed in the permit.
4. This permit conveys no title to land or water, does not constitute state
1111 recognition or acknowledgememt of title, and does not constitute authority
for the use of submerged lands unless herein provided and the necessary title
or leasehold interests have been obtained from the state. Only the Trustees
of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund may express state opinion as to title.
5. This permit does not relieve the permittee from liability for harm or
U injury to human health or welfare, animal, plant or aquatic life or property
and penalties therefor caused by the construction or operation of this
permitted source, nor does it allow the permittee to cause pollution in
contravention of Florida Statutes and department rules, unless specifically
authorized by an order from the department.
6. The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain the
facility and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances)
that are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the
conditions of this permit, as required by department rules. This provision
includes the operation of backup or auxiliary facilities or similar systems
when necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of the permit and
when required by department rules.
DER Form 17-1.201(5) Page 2 of 6
Effective November 30, 1982
a
ft
PERMITTEE: Charles Shumway PERMIT/CERTIFICATION
c/o William J. Johnson NO. 111000635
1250 Tamiami Trail North
Suite 203-B DATE OF ISSUE: August 12, 1986
Naples, Fl. 33940
!II
EXPIRATION DATE: July 31, 1989
7. The permittee, by accepting this permit, specifically agrees to allow
authorized department personnel, upon presentation of credentials or other
!Ill documents as may be required by law, access to the premises, at reasonable
times, where the permitted activity is located or conducted for the purpose
of:
;1111: a. Having access to and copying any records that mtxst be kept under the
conditions of the permit;
b. Inspecting the facility, equipment, practices, or operations regulated
or required under this permit; and
c. Sampling or monitoring any substances or parameters at any location
reasonably necessary to assure compliance with this permit or department .,
i rules.
Reasonable time may depend on the nature of the concern being
P investigated.
011 8. If, for any reason, the permittee does not comply with or will be unable to
comply with any condition or limitation specified in this permit, the
. permittee shall immediately notify and provide the department with the following
information:
1111 a. a description of and cause of non-compliance; and
b. the period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times; or, if not
corrected, the anticipated time the non-compliance is expected to continue, and
steps being taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the
OP non-compliance.
MIThe permittee shall be responsible for any and all damages which may result and
-may be subject to enforcement action by the department for penalties or
revocation of this permit.
III
9. In accepting this permit, the permittee understands and agrees that all
records, notes, monitoring data and other information relating to the
construction or operation of this permitted source, which are submitted to the
0101 department, may be used by the department as evidence in any enforcement case
arising under the Florida Statutes or department rules, except where such use is
proscribed by Sections 403.73 and 403. 111, Florida Statutes.
PR
10. The permittee agrees to comply with changes in department rules and Florida
Statutes after a reasonable time for compliance, provided however, the permittee
ill does not waive any other rights granted by Florida Statutes or department rules.
11. This permit is transferable only upon department approval in accordance with
Florida Administrative Code Rules 17-4.12 and 17-30.30, as applicable. The
ar permittee shall be liable for any non-compliance of the permitted activity until
the transfer is approved by the department.
illDER Form 17-1.201.(5) Page 3 of 6
Effective November 30, 1982
i _,
( c
PERMITTEE: Charles Shumway PERMIT/CERTIFICATION
c/o William J. Johnson NO. 111000635
1250 Tamiami Trail North
Suite 203-B DATE OF ISSUE: August 12, 1986
Naples, Fl. 33940
EXPIRATION DATE: July 31, 1989
1111
12. This permit is required to be kept at the work site of the permitted
activity during the entire period of construction or operation.
la13. This permit also constitutes:
U ( ) Determination of Best Available Control Technology (BACT)
( ) Determination of Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
(X) Certification of Compliance with State Water Quality Standards
(Section 401, PL 92-500)
III ( ) Compliance with New Source Performance Standards
14. The permittee shall comply with the following monitoring and record keeping
III requirements:
a. Upon Request, the permittee shall furnish all records and plans required
under department rules. The retention period for all records will be extended
U automatically, unless otherwise stipulated by the department, during the course
of any unresolved enforcement action.
a b. The permittee shall retain at the facility or other location designated by
s permit records of all monitoring information (including all calibration and
maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous
monitoring instrumentation), copies of all reports required by this permit, and
III records of all data used to complete the application for this permit. The time
period of retention shall be at least three years from the date of the sample,
measurement, report or application unless otherwise specified by department
III rule.
c. Records of monitoring information shall include:
IIIthe date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements;
the person responsible for performing the sampling or measurements;
the date(s) analyses were performed;
III the person responsible for performing the analyses;
the analytical techniques or methods used; and
the results of such analyses.
III15. When requested by the department, the permittee shall within a reasonable
time furnish any information required by law which is needed to determine
111 compliance with the permit. If the permittee becomes aware that relevant facts
were not submitted or were incorrect in the permit application or in any report
to the department, such facts or information shall be submitted or corrected
promptly.
III
DER Form 17-1.201(5) Page 4 of 6
Effective November 30, 1982
I
S
•
Ikr
•
Ii PERMITTEE: Charles Shumway PERMIT/CERTIFICATION
c/o William J. Johnson NO. 111000635
lit 1250 Tamiami Trail North
Suite 203—B DATE OF ISSUE: August 12, 1986
Naples, Fl. 33940
EXPIRATION DATE: July 31, 1989
II
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
1. The permittee is hereby advised that Florida law states: "No person shall
II commence any excavation, construction, or other activity involving the use
of sovereign or other lands of the state, title to which is vested in the
Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund or the Department
111 of Natural Resources under Chapter 253, until such person has received from
the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund the required
lease, license, easement, or other form of consent authorizing the proposed
III use." Pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 16Q-14, if such work is
done without consent, or if a person otherwise damages state land or products
of state land, the Board of Trustees may levy administrative fines of up to
$10,000 per offense.
III 2. Turbidity screens shall be utilized and properly maintained during the
permitted construction and shall remain in place until any generated
turbidity subsides.
r 3. The Punta Gorda Department of Environmental Regulation office shall be
f' notified in writing 48 hours prior to commencement of work and upon
completion of work.
4. No live—aboard boats shall be allowed.
5. No fuel facilities nor storage shall be allowed at the project.
6. - •rmative signs on proper boating techniques in manatee inhabitated waters
',all be provided at the docking facility.
11 7 The m tigation zone in the proposed riprap revetment shall consist of potted
18' m nimum height red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) seedlings anchored at 5
foot intervals along the toe of the bulkhead. A survivorship of 80% over 3
-rs shall be required. Natural recruitment of mangroves and other wetland
la plant species to the revetment and planting zone shall be allowed. •
8. The permittee shall, in coordination with the proper agencies, and adjacent
1111 reparian dockage, establish a no wake/idle speed zone around the project
site.
10. Annual monitoring reports, with color photographs, detailing the
quantitative and qualitative success of the mitigative mangrove plantings
® shall be submitted to the Punta Gorda DER office annually for three years.
In the event the survival period extends beyond the permit expiration date,
the permittee shall submit an agreement to the Punta Gorda DER office
1111 evidencing a continuing obligation to ensure the three year survival period
beyond the expiration date.
11. The project shall comply with applicable State Water Quality Standards,
III namely:
17-3.051 — Minimum Criteria for All Waters at All Times and All Places.
17-3.061 — Surface Waters: General Criteria.
17-3.121 — Criteria — Class III Waters — Recreation, Propagation and
IIIManagement of Fish and Wildlife: Surface Waters.
III
E eccivelNovember530, 1982 Page 5 of 6
•
c
.
PERMITTEE: Charles Shumway PERMIT/CERTIFICATION
c/o William J. Johnson NO. 111000635
1250 Tamiami Trail North
Suite 203—B DATE OF ISSUE: August 12, 1986
Naples, Fl. 33940
EXPIRATION DATE: July 31, 1989
U
Issued this 12th day of August 1986.
STATE OF FLORIDA
8 Pages Attached DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
0111
Philip R. Edwards
District Manager
1111 PRE/yr
1111 cc: Florida Marine Patrol
Grant Gelhardt, DNR
Collier Co. Property Appraiser
11111 United States Army Corps of Engineers
U
I/IU
m
I
Effect1vvelNovembe=530, 1982 Page 6 of 6
1t1_Z v-�
k.
• v
i
!I...11.0/"--.11 -ftstr
.dm, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
,, , i ,,, .P South District • 2269 Bay Strcct • Fort Mycrs, Florida 33901-2896 • 813-332-2667
Nq,
�� „���PI \� Bob Martinez. Governor Dale 7Wachtmann, Sccrctary John Shearer, Assistant Sccrctary
l`OF FIOR Philip Edwards,Deputy Assistant Sccrcury
II June :9, 1.989 TommT
I .. • . . , ,• , . . . . . •
JUN, .12 1989 ,
Mr. Charles Shumway _
ii c/o Richard B. Kepley .. - Dept of ivatvi . rigs• ;:ices
511
Shelter Island Joint Venture Div. of State Lands Southwest
Post Office Box 2288 Florida Field Office
IBonita Springs, Florida 33959 . a .
Modification to •Conditions
RE: Collier County - WRR
III • Permit #111000635
Dear Mr. Shumway: -
IIIWe are in receipt of your request for a modification of the permit conditions.
The conditions are changed as follows: .
III Condition From To
Expiration Date July 31 , 1989 August 12, 1991 •
I/I
This letter must be attached to your permit and becomes a part of that permit.
All other general and specific conditions of the permit shall remain unchanged.
III
This letter constitutes final agency action unless a person substantially
IIIaffected by this action requests an administrative hearing pursuant to Section
120.57, Florida Statutes. The petition must be filed within fourteen (14) days
from receipt of this letter. The petition must comply with the requirements of
Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-5 .201 and be filed pursuant to Rule
M17-103 .155( 1) in the Office of General Counsel of the Department of Environmental
•-- Regulation at 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32301-8241 . Petitions
which. are not filed in accordance with the above provisions will not be accepted
III by the Department. If a formal proceeding pursuant to Section 120.57(1) is
MIR
requested, at such formal hearing all parties shall have an opportunity to
respond, to present evidence and argument on all issues involved, to conduct
IIIcross-examination of witnesses and submit rebuttal evidence, to submit proposed
findings of facts and orders, to file exceptions to any order or hearing
- officer's recommended order, and to be represented by counsel. If an informal
U •
Mgt
r
XII DER File No. 111000635
June 9, 1989
Page Two .
11111
_proce,ding_is requested, the agency will, in accordance with its rules of
iii ,'' procedure, give affected persons or parties or their counsel an opportunity, at a
,convenient time and 'place, to present to the agency or hearing officer written or
oral evidence in opposition to the agency's action or refusal to act, or a
1111 ' written statement challenging the grounds upon which the agency has chosen .to .
justify i'ts 'action or inaction, pursuant to Section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes.
The hearing process is designed to formulate agency action. Accordingly, the
Department's final action as a result of a hearing may he different from the
lig position taken by it in this stage. Therefore, any person who may wish to
contest the Department's ultimate permitting decision must petition for hearing
within the fourteen day period described-above. Failure to file a request for
IIIhearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right such
person may have to request a hearing under Section 120.57, Florida Statutes .
IIISincerely,
4111! I
Philip R. dwards •
Deputy Assistant Secretary .
IIIPRE/JA/ds
Enclosure I I . ,
i
Copies to:
Collier County Property Appraiser •
rn
_Department of Natural Resources, .Fort Myers
Florida Marine Patrol, Fort Myers
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Tampa
U . I • 1
• . • . .
I . . . • . .
. .
. .
III , , .
_ ._
.
__
1111.
ill .
I.
._
•
y
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL AUGUST 17, 1988
*****
PETITION NO. : PU-88-5C
FILED BY/FOR: Richard B. Kepley of Shelter Island Joint
Venture , representing Bernard C . Johnson,
Trustee , of Shelter Island Trust (Continued from
8/3/88 ) .
REQUESTING: A provisional use "b" & "e" of RT for a
restaurant and marina located on the western
most half of an island situated in the
Cocohatchee River just east .of Wiggins Pass.
COMMENTS: Mr . Edwards stated that following the direction
' of the Committee at their meeting held on August.
3 , 1988 , to design a conceptual water quality
monitoring program for the above mentioned pro-
ject , he has revised Stipulation #4 and has
delineated the type of testing that the peti-
oeo
tioner should perform in the area. He noted
that this program would determine decomposition
of anti-fouling paint toxins , and petroleum
by-products levels in the waters. He stated
that these tests would indicate if contamination
of the waters would occur or would be occurring
from the establishment of the marina in the
area. He advised that he had specifically
listed Staff ' s recommendations as to where the
sampling sites should be established; methods to
110
be utilized for paint toxins ; recommendations on
ways to determine levels of petroleum by-
products , and steps the petitioner should follow
if the water sampling showed an increase in
paint toxins or petroleum by-products .
Mr . Edwards further advised that Biologist
Godfrey concurs with his recommendations of the
water quality monitoring program.
Mr . Burch advised that the Department of
Environmental Regulation (DER) is in the process
of determining standards that may be acceptable
as levels of certain heavy metals and other
toxins and sediments . He also stated that the
• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also
researching to determine acceptable levels of
heavy metals . Since the proposed standards are
;It k Page 3
1 r ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCILAUGUST 17 , - 1988
`` in the processing stages, he suggested that the
1
background measurements obtained before
construction be utilized for this site . DER has
a publication which delineates recommendable
I- analysis which the petitioner can use as a
, guideline , he added.
' r
Referring to the background measurements, Mr .
Below asked if a threshold existed, to which Mr .
Burch responded that he was not aware of any
' ,- threshold existing. He added that if the con-
centrations are exceeded from the present con-
centrations , further testing on site would be
1 . _. recommended to the proposed five-year monitoring
program.
Dr . Snyder concurred with Mr. Below' s statement ,
and added that a reference background value per-
centage should be determined. Mr. Below added
that after reviewing the monitoring program, it
was apparent that time schedules for when the
water sampling would be performed were not indi- Ji_
cated.
ill In regard to Stipulation #4 , Dr . Benedict recom-
mended the following changes:
Petitioner shall implement a statiscally defi-
ned water quality and sediment monitoring
program to determine potential water quality
impacts of the project , particularly to storm
water, and the levels of etc.
He added the following words after the words
III "therefore "water quality samples taken at low
slack tide shall be performed bi-monthly and
sediment tests shall be performed at least once
III a year . He amended "Methods for water quality
sampling and the methods for heavy metal , etc . "
He amended the words "will be used as the
III reference standards" to read "if compared to
initial ambient levels , water quality degrada-
tion occurs or if there is a build-up of sedi-
ment contaminants NRMD retains the right to
R require additional testing which could exceed
the five year time period. He amended the
second to last sentence of Stipulation #4 to
a
Page 4
I
Ili 4
• ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL AUGUST 17 , 1988
read "water quality degradation radation and metal con-
tamination will be implemented" .
The Committee then had a lengthy discussion
about their concerns about standards for heavy
metals, and sediment levels in the water .
Biologist Godfrey representing the petitioner ,
advised that there are specific standardsin the
Florida Administrative Code for heavy metals .
In response to Dr . Cardillo , Dr. Snyder
advised
that any increase in the pre-existing conditions
lit in the heavy metals should be given serious con-
sideration.
Biologist Godfrey then read the definition of
"natural background", and "background" as
defined in Chapter .17 . 3 , of the Florida
Administrative Code, regarding water quality
standards .
Mr . Below, however, stated that what the
Committee was trying to determine was a standard
which would indicate a specific proportion
should there be an increase in heavy metals, and
what proportion of that increase would result in
action by the different agencies who have juris-
diction.
Mr . Cardillo referred to the definitions in the
water quality regulations, and stated that out
of the 25 sub-sections, statistics are indicated
for three. He noted that the term for acute
toxicity and chronic toxicity could probably be
used as standards . Mr . Below stated that these
two terms gave relative levels of toxicity.
After further discussion, Dr . Benedict proposed
the following addition to Stipulation #4 : NRMD
review and approve modified or disapprove a
detailed monitoring program, prior to any pre-
construction sampling. The program shall speci-
fically define all procedures and standards to
be used based upon existing Federal and State
methods . Where such methods are not available ,
appropriate and defendable standards shall be
proposed by the petitioner and reviewed and
agreed upon by NRMD . No site construction can
occur before the monitoring program is approved.
Page 5
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL AUGUST 17 , 1988
1111- Environmental Science and Pollution Control
Director Lorenz , stated what has been discussed
could be interpreted as an 'overall policy that
could be developed into some statement of recom-
mendation for handling future monitoring
programs on proposed projects . Mr . Lorenz
stated that Staff could develop appropriate
methodology policy proposal for monitoring pro-
jects that the EAC can utilize as a guideline,
and the wording of such a proposal can either be
incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan or
approval can be obtained from the Board of
County Commissioners to utilize such a policy
instead of standard stipulations . He noted that
the scientific and technical issues can be
debated in this manner, thus making a sound
determination- on future petitions.
l'lIll1il1ilI1lIi
MOTION: Made by Ms. Kurgis to recommend approval of
Petition No. PU-88-5C with the following
Stipulations and with "New" Stipulation 44, as
modified. Seconded by Dr . Benedict . Carried
5/0.
STIPULATIONS :
1 . Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance
75-21 (or the tree/vegetation removal ordinance
in existence at the time of permitting) ,
requiring the acquisition of a tree removal per-
mit prior to any land clearing. A site clearing
plan shall be submitted to the Natural Resources
Management Department for their review and sub-
ject to approval prior to any work on the site.
This plan may be submitted in phases to coincide
with the development schedule. The site
ill clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final
site layout incorporates retained native vegeta-
tion to the maximum extent', possible and how
roads , buildings , lakes , parking lots , and other
Ilk - facilities have been oriented to accommodate
this goal .
2 . Native species shall be utilized, where
available, to the maximum extent possible in the
site landscaping design. A landscaping plan
will be submitted to the Natural Resources
Management Department and the Community .-.
•
111 . , Page 6
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL AUGUST 17 , 1988 •
Development Division for their review and sub-
ject to their approval . This plan will depict
the incorporation of native species and their
mix with other species, if any. The goal of
site landscaping shall be the re-creation of
native vegetation and habitat characteristics
lost on the site during construction or due to
past activities .
3 . All exotic plants, as defined in the County
Code, shall be removed during each phase of
construction from development areas, open space
areas, and preserve areas . Following site deve-
lopment , a maintenance program shall be imple-
mented to prevent reinvasion of the site by such
exotic species. This plan, which will describe
control techniques and inspection intervals ,
shall be filed with and subject to approval by
the Natural Resources Management Department and
the Community Development Division.
4 . Petitioner shall implement a statiscally defined
water quality and sediment monitoring program to
determine potential water quality impacts of the
project of the levels of heavy metals derived
from the decomposition of anti-fouling paint
toxins and petroleum by-products in the sedi-
ments surrounding Shelter Island. The moni-
toring program will run for five years the first
set of tests to be performed prior to any
construction activity, thereafter water quality
samples taken at low slack tide shall be per-
formed at least once a year . At least five
sampling sites will be established in the
southern by-pass channel , in close proximity to
the proposed docks, with two control sites
established east of the project . Methods for
water quality sampling and methods for heavy
metals will follow the procedures designed by
the U. S . Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA,
1982 ) , including the modifications developed by
DER for work performed in saline environments,
(FDER, 1984) , for arsenic, cadmium, copper, and
mercury based on their relationship to natural
aluminum concentrations . Petitioner will use an
acceptable method for determining petroleum by-
product concentrations, such as the USEPA 610
gas chromatographic method. If no State or
Federal standards exist for any of the parame-
Page 7
11 • ,
• ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL AUGUST 17, 1988
ters throughout the length of the monitoring
program, then the values derived from the pre- i
construction samples will be used if compared to
initial ambient levels , water quality degrada-
tion occurs or if there is a build-up of sedi-
ment contaminants NRMD retains the right to
require additional testing which could exceed
- the five year time period. NRMD review and
approve modified or disapprove a detailed moni-
toring program, prior to preconstruction
sampling. The program shall specifically define
all procedures and standards to be used based
upon existing federal and state methods . Where
such methods are not available, appropriate
defendable standards shall be proposed by the
petitioner and reviewed and agreed upon by NRMD.
No site construction can occur before the moni-
toring program is approved.
5 . NRMD agrees with and adopts the DER stipulations
as expressed in DER permit #111000635 .
6 . Petitioner shall install and maintain signs at
the four access ramps that are designed to
-- inform, educate , and warn boaters of shallow
waters , environmentally sensitive areas , and the
ii possible presence of protected species ; infor-
mation on protected species should include, but
not be limited to , the West Indian Manatee
(Tribe manatus) and the American Bald Eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocenhalus} . The signs and their
posting shall be subject to the review and
approval of NRMD.
ill '
s::*s
,
lill , . .
ill _
ill
V
--
t "
^
��
•
MEMORANDUM
Date: 13 August , 1988
To: EAC members
From: James N. Burch , Acting Supervisor , Natural Resources
Management Department (NRMD)
Reason: Rezone petition for Naples Golf Estates (R-88-6C) .
At the last EAC meeting (8/3/88) , • a final evaluation for
Naples Golf Estates rezone petition (R-88-6C) was not determined
by the EAC, pursuant to NRMD ' s recommendation for denial of the
petition. At their direction, EAC representatives met on the site
of the proposed rezone with the petitioner and NRMD. With advice
from the EAC members present and additional information from the
petitioner , NRMD proposes the following stipulations specific to
petition R-88-6C. NRMD feels that these stipulations would be
appropriate if the EAC moves to approve this petition.
^'`S Stipulations to be considered for Naples Golf Estates PUD:
'
1-4. Standard stipulations 1-4.
5. All areas that shall be preserves (areas to be maintained as
preserves) on the Master Plan, must be flagged by the petitioner
prior to any construction in the adjacent area; these boundaries
shall be subject to the review and approval of Natural Resources
Management Department . Similarly, ecotonal areas shall be
identified and reviewed by NRMD prior to approval by The Collier
County Board of Commissioners. These areas are to be recognized
as areas requiring a higher level of review prior to final site
development approval , and subject to mapping and field
adjustment . As part of final site development approval these
adjustments to ecotonal boundaries shall be recorded as
boundaries of the preserve areas.
6. Uses of ecotonal habitats that are determined not to be within
the preserve areas shall be restricted to limited development
such as golf course roughs, passive recreation, or residential
yards. Residential areas that contain such ecotonal habitats
shall be subject to deed restrictions that will include these
areas within the building setback limits, and allow no land
clearing, filling , or sodding in these designated areas.
/-"N 7. Residents shall take special means to preserve extant
biological communities (exclusive of toxic plants or venomous
animals) . Deed restrictions shall mandate a minimum of clearing
of native vegetation on residential lots, and that a County Tree
1
_
'
'-
.
'-N Removal Permit be obtained by the lot owner prior to land
clearing .
B. The "aqua-range" water management excavation as depicted on
the site plan shall be designed and constructed in a manner that
is accommodating to the existing cypress wetlands. Shorelines
shall reflect this in design to retain existing cypress wetland
habitats. | he intact viable cypress wetland in the center of this
water management feature shall be maintained as a habitat island .
9. The petitioner shall design, construct , and maintain a water
management plan that will restore historic water levels and
hydroperiods in the project water retention and preserve areas.
The feasibility of this restoration shall be documented by
engineering design and calculations, subject to the review and
approval of NRMD and the County engineering department . NRMD will
work with the petitioner to help in the design and recreation if
natural surface water flow.
10. To maintain aquifer recharge and natural surface water
sheetflow, • all surface water management shall be achieved on
site. Surface water shall not be discharged into the 951 drainage
canal on the western boundary of the property , or into its
tributaries.
,~N 11 . As much as is practical and possible of the upland oak
hammock and adjacent cabbage palm hammock in the north central
area of the tract , as identified on site, shall remain as a
preserve area. The palm hammock south of the proposed commercial
area, as identified on site and by aerial photograph , shall
similarly be preserved intact . The physical limits of these
hammocks shall be identified by the petitioner , and shall be
subject to the review and approval of NRMD.
12. To increase biological productivities and enhance habitat
values, side slopes of lakes adjacent to preserve areas shall be
designed and constructed at a pitch of 10: 1 to a depth of three
feet below mean low water . Other lake side slopes shall be
designed and constructed at a pitch of 4: 1 to a depth of three
feet below mean low water . Lake margins shall be adequately
planted with compatible littoral and emergent native plants, to
help restore native littoral habitat .
13. The petitioner shall design and implement a program to
prevent or minimize populations of noxious/exotic aquatic plants
in the water management systems. These species should include,
but not be limited to , hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) and water
hyacinth (Ei0hhpEn0 gT:ilKssipeg.) . This program shall be subject to
the review and approval of NRMD.
14. The petitioner shall be responsible to provide a survey for
'"N. the presence and distribution of protected species, subject to
NRMD review and approval , prior to approval of the subdivision
master plan. The survey shall encompass any species on the
latest edition of the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish
2
'
+ �
.
/—N. Commission ' s "Official Lists of Endangered and Potentially
Endangered Fauna and Flora in Florida" , specifically the gopher
tortoise (Ggphenvs [lolyphemus> and the red-cockaded woodpecker
(PicOdPs. b2[e:ali§.) . If warranted , project designs will be
adjusted and/ or individuals and/ or populations of protected
plants and animals will be relocated to the preserve areas or
other appropriate areas approved by NRMD.
15. An archaeological survey shall be conducted by qualified
personnel , subject to approval by NRMD, prior to approval of the
subdivision master plan. If warranted , project designs will be
adjusted to save any existing historic or archaeological sites,
or the artifacts carefully removed and saved as per accepted
archaeological field practices. Adjusted project designs and/ or
removal of artifacts shall be subject to approval by NRMD.
16. The four upland islands in the eastern third of the site
shall not be developed , but shall remain as habitat islands
within that preserve area.
17. Any access structures that must be placed within preserve
areas of the project shall provide sufficient water flow beneath
the structure to minimize water impoundment and obstruction of
natural water flow through the preserve area. Road and path
construction throughout the project shall be designed and
constructed at a minimum width , as determined by good road
/..1
construction standards, to minimize destruction of existing
habitat .
18. The petitioner shall design and implement proper culvert or
breach points in the existing powerline easement to help restore
historic surface flow patterns through the western part of the
project . NRMD will work with the petitioner to obtain permission
from the utility company that possesses this easement for
construction of these structures.
19. Final alignment of all structures, configuration of water
management excavations, roads, etc . shall be subject to minor
field adjustments to preserve valuable existing habitat elements.
20. The petitioner and the Natural Resources Management
Department shall cooperate on the final layout of the golf
course, in an attempt to produce habitat compromise that is
acceptable to both parties. Prior to construction, golf holes and
fairways will be field staked by the petitioner and subject to
review and approval of the Natural Resources Management
Department . The petitioner and NRMD will cooperate in the final
layout of the golf course in any areas where it invades the
wetland or ecotonal wetland areas, to result in a course design
that minimizes impact on these habitats, subject to good golf
course design. The petitioner shall make reasonable field
em\ adjustments of the golf course to minimize habitat destruction to
the extent practicable and consistant with good golf course
design.
3
n NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT (NRMD)
STAFF REPORT
FOR EAC MEETING 8/3/88
PETITION: Alan D. Reynolds, AICP, of Wilson, Miller, Barton,
Soll and Peek, Inc. , representing Manufactured Housing
Associates, Inc. , W. Craig Voight, President;
requesting a zoning change from A-2 and A-2 ST to PUD
for a residential and commercial development ( "Naples
Golf Estates" ) .
CONSIDERATIONS:
1 . Location
The area under consideration for rezoning is a 614 acre
parcel (approximately one square mile or almost an entire
section) located southeast of the intersection of C.R. 951 and
Old S.R. 84 (S2, T50S, R26E) . The Toll Plaza RV Park (20.5
acres, R-83-31 ) and the East Toll Plaza RV Resort ( 19.7 acres, R-
85-11C) are located to the east of the parcel , adjacent to
undeveloped agriculturally-zoned (A-2) land with pockets of
wetlands that have been assigned ST zoning overlays. A similar
agriculturally-zoned (A-2) area with scattered ST overlays is
located south of the subject property. The parcel is bounded on
the north and on the west by Old S.R. 84 and C.R. 951 ,
respectively. A map of the surrounding land uses is included as
Attachment 1 . The site was inspected on May 26, 1988 by Andrea
Stevens and Keith Edwards (both of NRMD) , accompanied by Robin
Trutwin (Wilson, Miller , Barton, Soll and Peek, Inc . ) and Ray
Link (Environmental Consultant) . Several subsequent site
inspections were conducted by NRMD staff during the following 7
weeks.
2. Proposed Development
The petitioner is requesting a rezoning of the parcel from
A-2 and A-2 ST to PUD for a residential and commercial
development to be known as "Naples Golf Estates" . The
development will have a project density of 1 .3 units per acre
with 790 dwelling units (single and multi-family housing) .
Approximately 50% of the property area will be designated as
"Conservation and Open Space" , as defined by the petitioner in
the rezone application materials. Other proposed land uses
include an 18-hole golf course and Recreation and Community
Center (78 acres) , water management areas (dredged lakes; 87.5
acres) , right-of-ways ( 15 acres) , a commercial site (9.9 acres) ,
and a sewage treatment facility (4 acres) . The petitioner is
estimating a 7-year build-out period for the project.
• '
Staff Report R-88-6C
EAC Meeting 8/3/88
Page 2
3. Vegetation
Species lists are included as Attachment 2, and the NRMD
vegetation map is included as Attachment 3.
CYPRESS DOMINATED WETLANDS
Approximately 54/. (333 acres) of the total project area has
been claimed as jurisdictional wetlands by the Florida Department
of Environmental Regulation (DER) . This jurisdictional
assessment was completed in January of 1986. Three areas on site
are included within these juridictional limits: 1 ) most of the
eastern half of the parcel (approximately 218 acres) ; 2) a
smaller wetland along the southern property boundary
(approximately 23 acres) ; and 3) an area near the northwest
corner of the site (approximately 92 acres) .
The first two areas of DER wetlands (most of the eastern
half of the parcel and an area near the southern property
boundary) are dominated by hatrack cypress (Taxodium distichum)
in an open prairie-like biotope, with low to mid-size cypress
( 10-20 feet in height) with diameters (DBHs) of up to 7 inches.
Slash pine (Pinus elliottii ) are noted infrequently (5-107. of the
canopy) among the cypress, and shrub layer vegetation includes
wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) and corkwood (Stillinqia aquatica> .
Groundcover in this biotope is made up of various prairie grasses
and sedges, swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) , rush (Juncus
bakerii ) , with scattered St. John' s Wort (Hypericum
fasciculatum) . Distinct cypress sloughs or heads are difficult
to delineate in these two wetland areas, although such hatrack
cypress prairies may have been sloughs in the past. Very few
cypress seedlings are noted in these areas, probably as a result
of the poor soil conditions or shortened hydroperiods which
would preclude seed germination.
The northwest wetland area is more characteristic of a
cypress head. This biotope is dominated by a nearly closed
canopy of cypress trees with diameters of up to 10 inches.
Scattered slash pines range in size from saplings to older trees,
still within the understory layer. Shrub and groundcover
vegetation similar to that of the prairie cypress biotope is
found in this cypress head wetland. Peripheral areas of the
biotope are heavily infested with the noxious exotic melaleuca
(Melaleuca quinquenervia) .
The vegetative associations found in both types of cypress
dominated wetlands are indicative of seasonally inundated areas.
Lichen and moss growth is consistently noted on cypress
buttresses, with water marks of up to 14 inches. Present day
hydroperiods in these areas are considerably shorter than
historical inundation seasons.
•
Staff Report R-88-6C
EAC Meeting 8/3/88
Page 3
Underlying soils in the DER wetlands include Arzell Fine
Sand, Pompano Fine Sand, and Cypress Swamp Soil . These soils are
poorly drained and have limited water storage capabilities.
BUTTONBUSH/ALLIGATOR FLAG PONDS
Several topographic depressions are found within the DER
wetland boundaries. These biotopes support a dense growth of
buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) with some red maple (Acer
rubrum) , saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia) , and various annual
weeds. Coastal Plain willow (Salix caroliniana) forms a boundary
around these lower areas, and is scattered among the buttonbush.
Pockets of alligator flag (Thalia qeniculata) identify areas that
undergo lengthy periods of seasonal flooding. A dense thicket of
the noxious exotic Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius)
separates the surrounding cypress wetlands from these ponded
biotopes. In addition, large cypress trees ( 10" in diameter and
greater ) and rotted cypress stumps (up to 24" in diameter, and
possibly logged in the past) are found around the perimeter of
these depressions.
Soils underlying the buttonbush/alligator flag ponds are
predominantly Cypress Swamp soils, which are characterized by
slow drainage and extended periods of inundation.
MIXED CYPRESS/PINE WETLANDS
Subsequent to the construction of the C.R. 951 canal and a
Florida Power and Light easement (poorly culverted) through the
property, a lowering of the water table has created conditions
favoring the invasion of the cypress wetlands by slash pines.
Many areas adjacent to the cypress dominated wetlands support
these mixed cypress/pine wetlands, with cypress/pine canopy
ratios ranging from 70:30 to 40:60. The shrub and groundcover
layers in these biotopes support various wetland indicator
species such as wax myrtle, red bay (Persea borbonia) , swamp
fern, St. John's Wort , small-fruited beak rush (Rhyncospora
microcarpa) , morning glory ( Ipomoea spp. ) , and various wetland
grasses (Aristida affinis, Xyris spp. ) . In addition, several
upland species were noted in these biotopes, indicating a gradual
succession to drier conditions caused by the disruption of
historical drainage patterns.
It is evident that the mixed cypress/pine biotopes are at
least seasonally inundated, as lichen and moss lines are found at
heights of up to 6" (above mean ground level ) on cypress
buttresses and corkwood. In several areas, meandering drainage
ruts (dried out at the time of NRMD site visits) expose
underlying soils. Soils in these wetlands include Arzell Fine
Sand, Charlotte Fine Sand, Keri Fine Sand, and Cypress Swamp
Soil .
Staff Report R-88-6C
EAC Meeting 8/3/88
Page 4
NRMD has identified these mixed cypress/pine biotopes as
viable wetlands, and therefore valuable habitats for aquifer
recharge, water quality improvement, stormwater abatement, flood
mitigation, endangered and threatened species survival , and
aesthetic qualities (for further discussion, see Mitsch, W.J. ,
and J.G. Gosselink, 1986. Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. ,
N.Y. ) . The vegetation found in these cypress/pine wetlands was
described to Dr. Michael J. Duever (Ecosystem Research Unit,
National Audubon Society; personal communication with Keith
Edwards) . He agreed that such biotopes are functioning wetlands,
and that proper restoration of historic hydrological periods
would reverse the current successional trend toward upland
biotopes. Consequently, these sensitive biotopes merit
particular attention, and should be afforded adequate protection
in any land alteration activities.
PINE FLATWOODS WITH CABBAGE PALM
Areas within the central north-south sector of the parcel
support a pine flatwoods biotope dominated by slash pine and
scattered cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto) , with a sparse understory
of palmetto (Serenoa repens) . Additional shrub layer vegetation
includes smooth sumac (Rhus copallina) , buckthorn (Bumelia spp. ) ,
and shiny blueberry (Vaccinium myrsinites) . Rusty lyonia (Lyonia
ferruqinea) , fox grape (Vitis spp. ) , and various grass species
make up the groundcover layer . Underlying soils in this
biotope include Keri Fine Sand and Charlotte Fine Sand.
Pines with diameters of up to 12" are found in this area,
and the trees are often widely spaced, creating an open canopy.
Burn scars were noted on several trunks, and many trees are dead,
probably as a result of the intensity of some of the fires. Such
a pine-dominated biotope may potentially serve as a foraging site
for the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Piciodes borealis) .
PALMETTO UPLAND
Still within the central north-south sector of the property,
open palmetto upland areas are found among the pine flatwoods
biotopes. These dry areas support extensive palmetto growth, in
addition to smooth sumac , rusty lyonia, pennyroyal , and a mixture
of grass species. Slash pine and cabbage palm occur infrequently
in these open areas, again, possibly as a result of widespread
high-intensity burning. Charlotte Fine Sand is the dominant soil
type underlying the palmetto habitats.
The upland character and sandy substrate of the open
palmetto uplands provide favorable conditions for the gopher
tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) , a protected species, although
NRMD did not observe any burrows during site inspections.
Staff Report R-B8-6C
EAC Meeting 8/3/88
Page 5
CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS
Several slightly raised hammock-like biotopes on site are
dominated by cabbage palm, with wax myrtle and saw palmetto
understory. Subdominant species include slash pine, dahoon
holly, and wild coffee (Psychotria nervosa) . Encroaching
Brazilian pepper is usually found in peripheral areas of these
hammocks. Several vine species such as grape (Vitis spp. ) ,
greenbriar (Smilax spp. ) , and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
make up the groundcover layer. These elevated sites are not
characterized by one distinct soil type, although Keri Fine Sand
is found in several of these areas.
OAK HAMMOCK
A hammock in the north-central area of the property supports
several oak species (Quercus spp. ) , with cabbage palm and smaller
understory hardwoods. The oaks range in size from saplings to
mature trees with diameters of up to 10 inches. The oaks provide
niches for numerous air plants (Tillandsia spp. ) .
4. Archaeology
John Beriault, president of the Southwest Florida
Archaeological Society, has stated that there is a high
probability of archaeological sites in the raised hammock areas
on the property (personal communication, June 9, 1988) . An
archaeological survey of the parcel should be completed prior to
any land alteration.
5. Belle Meade Drainage Basin
The subject property is located within the Belle Meade
Drainage Basin. The basin includes 49 sections, and drains land
around the Golden Gate Estates area (Attachment 4) . Although
road and canal construction across the basin has disrupted and
diverted historic flow patterns, most water ultimately flows into
and feeds the Rookery Bay and Ten Thousand Islands estuarine
ecosystem. The Rookery Bay National Estuarine Sanctuary
management and staff should be offered a chance to comment on
this rezone application. Any proposed development within this
basin should address the consequences of further alteration of
the flow ways, and the possible effects of such an impact on the
estuarine systems maintained by this drainage.
6. Water Management Concerns
The Collier County Water Management Department Staff
recommended denial of this project to the Water Management
Advisory Board. The Board, nevertheless, voted 4-0 during the
July 13, 1988 meeting to forward a recommendation of approval to
Staff Report R-88-6C
EAC Meeting 8/3/88
Page 6
the Collier County Planning Commission. The Water Management
Department Staff Report is included as Attachment 5.
7. Collier County Comprehensive Plan Compliance
The eastern boundary of the Urban Area designated in the
Comprehensive Plan ( 1983) is located one mile east of C.R. 951 .
Therefore, the Naples Golf Estates parcel is currently located
within this zone. During public hearings for the proposed
Comprehensive Plan revisions, there was considerable debate
concerning the relocation of this eastern boundary of the Urban
Area to the west, to coincide with C.R. 951 . Recently, the one
mile strip of Urban Area east of C.R. 951 was designated as a
"Study Area" by the Board of County Commissioners, to allow for
additional study of the suitability of this area for urban
development.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The master plan for this petition indicates that extensive
development is proposed throughout the mixed cypress/pine wetland
biotopes. The Natural Resources Management Department is greatly
concerned with the potential adverse impacts which will be
imposed on these wetland systems and their resource values by
this development.
NRMD recommends that a major portion of these mixed
cypress/pine forests be preserved and designated as Conservation
Areas. This would allow for the protection of most of the
wetlands on site, as the petitioner has already agreed to
preserve the cypress dominated wetland areas. It is essential
that the cypress/pine areas be afforded conservation status
comparable to that already assigned to the cypress dominated
biotopes. The intrinsic value of these cypress/pine forests to
Collier County as viable wetlands systems should be acknowledged
and appreciated.
Consequently, NRMD recommends denial of this petition as
proposed.
.
�
� � .
��
Staff Report R-88-6C
EAC Meeting 8/3/88
Page 7
9
PREPARED BY: f '_, %• � DATE: 7•2y`88_______
Andrea Stev;.ns, NRMD
� ��g
REVIEWED BY: DATE: ' " ����____
-�� -----
(NRMD)
A777 , �
ifi -- -.- ,___,
DATE: 7r--
eo Bozo , Acting Dir. , NRMD /
ATTACHMENT 1: Naples Golf
?-- -t:1 Estates and surrounding land
c uses.
v_
see
M
o >. n N
1 -opo d
a
v of
6
K. I j4_
v itt. In
Q11
3
a4...J H
or
N o
H
1 N
�c �' c
41 m *O '
tri irc k7m
h
0
H
J
1
.a
P v
t1
et s i 4`
QN
Da
oetc
o r
ATTACHMENT 2: Species noted during NRMD
site inspections.
SPECIES LISTS
Species listed in approximate order of dominance.
*denotes exotic vegetation.
CYPRESS DOMINATED WETLANDS:
canopy/
understory: Taxodium distichum bald cypress
Pinus elliottii slash pine
Ilex cassine dahoon holly
*Melaleuca quinquenervia cajeput
Persea borbonia red bay
Myrsine quianensis myrsine
shrub layer: Myrica cerifera wax myrtle
Stillinqia aquatica corkwood
Baccharis halimifolia saltbush
groundcover: Aristida affinis poverty grass
Panicum hemitomon maidencane
Fimbristylis spp. fringe-rushes
Hypericum fasciculatum St . John's Wort
Juncus bakerii rushes
Blechnum serrulatum swamp fern
Cladium jamaicense sawgrass
Eupatorium capillifolium dog fennel
Thelypteris spp. shield ferns
Eriocaulon decanqulare hatpins
air plants: Tillandsia spp.
Encyclia tampensis butterfly orchid
BUTTONBUSH/FLAG PONDS:
canopy/
understory: Salix caroliniana willow
*Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper
Taxodium distichum bald cypress
Acer rubrum red maple
Annona qlabra pond apple
Fraxinus caroliniana pop ash
Persea borbonia red bay
shrub layer: Cephalanthus occidentalis buttonbush
Myrica cerifera wax myrtle
Psychotria nervosa wild coffee
Baccharis halimifolia saltbush
,••••••..
groundcover: Thalia qeniculata alligator flag
annual herbs
ATTACHMENT 2: Species noted during NRMD
site inspections.
SPECIES LISTS
Species listed in approximate order of dominance.
*denotes exotic vegetation.
CYPRESS DOMINATED WETLANDS:
canopy/
understory: Taxodium distichum bald cypress
Pinus elliottii slash pine
Ilex cassine dahoon holly
*Melaleuca quinquenervia cajeput
Persea borbonia red bay
Myrsine quianensis myrsine
shrub layer: Myrica cerifera wax myrtle
Stillinqia aquatica corkwood
Baccharis halimifolia saltbush
groundcover: Aristida affinis poverty grass
Panicum hemitomon maidencane
Fimbristylis spp. fringe-rushes
Hypericum fasciculatum St . John's Wort
Juncus bakerii rushes
Blechnum serrulatum swamp fern
Cladium jamaicense sawgrass
Eupatorium capillifolium dog fennel
Thelypteris spp. shield ferns
Eriocaulon decanqulare hatpins
air plants: Tillandsia spp.
Encyclia tampensis butterfly orchid
BUTTONBUSH/FLAG PONDS:
canopy/
understory: Salix caroliniana willow
*Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper
Taxodium distichum bald cypress
Acer rubrum red maple
Annona qlabra pond apple
Fraxinus caroliniana pop ash
Persea borbonia red bay
shrub layer: Cephalanthus occidentalis buttonbush
Myrica cerifera wax myrtle
Psychotria nervosa wild coffee
Baccharis halimifolia saltbush
,••••••..
groundcover: Thalia qeniculata alligator flag
annual herbs
•
MIXED CYPRESS/PINE WETLANDS:
canopy/
understory: Taxodium distichum bald cypress
Pinus elliottii slash pine
(these first two species are found at various ratios)
Sabal palmetto cabbage palm
*Melaleuca quinquenervia cajeput
*Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper
Ficus aurea strangler fig
Persea borbonia red bay
shrub layer: Myrica cerifera wax myrtle
Baccharis halimifolia saltbush
Serenoa repens saw palmetto
*Rhodomyrtus tomentosus downy rosemyrtle
groundcover: Aristida affinis poverty grass
Rhyncospora microcarpa beak rush
Xyris spp. yellow-eye grass
Blechnum serrulatum swamp fern
Cladium jamaicense sawgrass
Vitis spp. grape
Hypericum fasciculatum St. John's Wort
Hypericum cistifolium St. John's Wort
Thelypteris spp. shield ferns
Ipomoea spp. morning glory
Pluchea odorata fleabane
Fuirena scirpoidea rush fuirena
Eupatorium mikanioides semaphore eupatorium
air plants: Tillandsia spp.
PINE FLATWOODS WITH CABBAGE PALM:
canopy/
understory: Pinus elliottii slash pine
Sabal palmetto cabbage palm
shrub layer: Serenoa repens saw palmetto
Lyonia ferruqinea rusty lyonia
Rhus copallina smooth sumac
Bumelia spp. buckthorn
Vaccinium myrsinites shiny blueberry
groundcover Poaceae family grass species
Vitis spp. grape
Piloblephis rigida pennyroyal
Phlebodium aureum snake fern
Pteridium aquilinum bracken fern
air plants: Vittaria lineata shoestring fern
•
MIXED CYPRESS/PINE WETLANDS:
canopy/
understory: Taxodium distichum bald cypress
Pinus elliottii slash pine
(these first two species are found at various ratios)
Sabal palmetto cabbage palm
*Melaleuca quinquenervia cajeput
*Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper
Ficus aurea strangler fig
Persea borbonia red bay
shrub layer: Myrica cerifera wax myrtle
Baccharis halimifolia saltbush
Serenoa repens saw palmetto
*Rhodomyrtus tomentosus downy rosemyrtle
groundcover: Aristida affinis poverty grass
Rhyncospora microcarpa beak rush
Xyris spp. yellow-eye grass
Blechnum serrulatum swamp fern
Cladium jamaicense sawgrass
Vitis spp. grape
Hypericum fasciculatum St. John's Wort
Hypericum cistifolium St. John's Wort
Thelypteris spp. shield ferns
Ipomoea spp. morning glory
Pluchea odorata fleabane
Fuirena scirpoidea rush fuirena
Eupatorium mikanioides semaphore eupatorium
air plants: Tillandsia spp.
PINE FLATWOODS WITH CABBAGE PALM:
canopy/
understory: Pinus elliottii slash pine
Sabal palmetto cabbage palm
shrub layer: Serenoa repens saw palmetto
Lyonia ferruqinea rusty lyonia
Rhus copallina smooth sumac
Bumelia spp. buckthorn
Vaccinium myrsinites shiny blueberry
groundcover Poaceae family grass species
Vitis spp. grape
Piloblephis rigida pennyroyal
Phlebodium aureum snake fern
Pteridium aquilinum bracken fern
air plants: Vittaria lineata shoestring fern
PALMETTO UPLAND:
canopy/
understory: Pinus elliottii slash pine
Sabal palmetto cabbage palm
shrub layer: Serenoa repens saw palmetto
Rhus copallina smooth sumac
Lyonia ferruqinea rusty lyonia
groundcover: Vitis spp. grape
Piloblephis rigida pennyroyal
CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS:
canopy/
understory: Sabal palmetto cabbage palm
Pinus elliottii slash pine
*Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper
Ilex cassine dahoon holly
Ficus aurea strangler fig
Persea borbonia red bay
Myrsine quianensis myrsine
Morus rubra red mulberry
shrub layer: Myrica cerifera wax myrtle
Serenoa repens saw palmetto
Psychotria nervosa wild coffee
Chrysobalanus icaco coco plum
Ilex qlabra gallberry
Baccharis halimifolia saltbush
groundcover: Vitis spp. grape
Blechnum serrulatum swamp fern
Smilax spp. greenbriar
Toxicodendron radicans poison ivy
Pluchea odorata camphor weed
Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia creeper
Phlebodium aureum snake fern
Pteridium aquilinum bracken fern
air plants: Vittaria lineata shoestring fern
PALMETTO UPLAND:
canopy/
understory: Pinus elliottii slash pine
Sabal palmetto cabbage palm
shrub layer: Serenoa repens saw palmetto
Rhus copallina smooth sumac
Lyonia ferruqinea rusty lyonia
groundcover: Vitis spp. grape
Piloblephis rigida pennyroyal
CABBAGE PALM HAMMOCKS:
canopy/
understory: Sabal palmetto cabbage palm
Pinus elliottii slash pine
*Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper
Ilex cassine dahoon holly
Ficus aurea strangler fig
Persea borbonia red bay
Myrsine quianensis myrsine
Morus rubra red mulberry
shrub layer: Myrica cerifera wax myrtle
Serenoa repens saw palmetto
Psychotria nervosa wild coffee
Chrysobalanus icaco coco plum
Ilex qlabra gallberry
Baccharis halimifolia saltbush
groundcover: Vitis spp. grape
Blechnum serrulatum swamp fern
Smilax spp. greenbriar
Toxicodendron radicans poison ivy
Pluchea odorata camphor weed
Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia creeper
Phlebodium aureum snake fern
Pteridium aquilinum bracken fern
air plants: Vittaria lineata shoestring fern
OAK HAMMOCK:
canopy/
understory: Quercus spp. oaks
Sabal palmetto cabbage palm
Myrsine quianensis myrsine
*Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper
Persea borbonia red bay
Diospyrus spp. persimmon
shrub layer: Psychotria nervosa wild coffee
Serenoa repens saw palmetto
groundcover: Verbesina virqinica frostweed
air plants: Tillandsia spp.
Encyclia tampensis butterfly orchid
OAK HAMMOCK:
canopy/
understory: Quercus spp. oaks
Sabal palmetto cabbage palm
Myrsine quianensis myrsine
*Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper
Persea borbonia red bay
Diospyrus spp. persimmon
shrub layer: Psychotria nervosa wild coffee
Serenoa repens saw palmetto
groundcover: Verbesina virqinica frostweed
air plants: Tillandsia spp.
Encyclia tampensis butterfly orchid
0)
w
rd ATTACHMENT 3 : NRMD Vegetation Map
Ed
H .-- (approximate delineations
0 rd 3 0 E w only)
3 s~
rd a s~ H U O
W •H 4-1 •H E
+) bl a ,- m E
rd mi \ O -I-) 'ti \ rci
H --- S~ u) 4
U) E~ o O •• H O E S
O O 4ii U) P: O H r-I
O rd U) al Q 3rd rd U
a ung O � aao
H W O Oro � w tr) tY) rd
r--- +J U D W rd d 4
Z 0 >1 H 0 H� A .1 x
U ,Q E 5 rd •H rci M rd
im I I I fx R; P. O O O
z U) z I I I I
AWN
O W
O L
s FC
W ELME
i-.41Za
� � cn
Q
z
Ca o
w P4H14 a
U, L 7
Z \ U Q s Q 14
a
O 3 E Q K44
Qa 3 � e w
oa 14 M PQ
w3 x N N < wrw� w � � Z
cn w � a Haz
U O Q HZ. / 91: IC)PP .117 r4
121
K U
Q a 11694 Z
H
O ZCr)
I O W C Ca
Z L C7 Q Z
°x ° KC � KC Ng a Q � Er.a
m . EUi z a
P U) 0 cf.,H
ww < w Fw < w Fw z W w
ws a % U asxa; za a• wa3
El /-,- 44 : gp FC -• CW7 U HH UW U
X0 a Q 3
U cK. v1 a o
+ .. rr 0 -_
W Q '� f H F4 41 a
>4 < CO wU) �yV P-1 14
V.--
X
,,, a,
v a U U) H Ca O W 0 a
qW W WZ < cn U << cn W
w3 � P4Ha • q Wza U) 0 <
X M a X P En z a H P U) Z FC
H W ,-I r ' >-1O W Q W aC W Ca W <EZ WW C UQ3 ELI P4 Ell a 41 (244114 <
a,,� -K H>4HWFC H �+ H W H U
asa ZUO4 va3
'_15 25 /
10 't` ' ATTACHMENT 4 : Belle Meade
..___________--6-,____--c- Drainage Basin
/ cpp�S 0,%\N cu
\ I / 2 5
\ - 15 � y --�•,-/
IMPERIAL RIVER BASIN \ /
5t0 I I e I 1
LEE COUNTY 1� I / s•; I \
\ ) COLLIER COUNTY
1. I \ H / '
/ /
COCOHATCHEE RIVER r.. I /
BASIN /
\10 15
5 f Q�vEQ /
00 // '1
• 10 ‘0 proposed Naples / „v.\t�� /
QGolf Estates
` 5 Qc' // I /
NAPLES NI- !/G /0 /
/ 4�e' \ w
fl
,t, l1B
5
i
N
ors ,
0
t
jAht s
_ --- ,233
oo,v3
i
,-, 'ii
SOURCE : Tabb , D.C . , E.J. Heald, T.R. Alexander, M.A. Roessler,
and G.L. Beardsley . 1976 . An ecological and hydrological
assessment of the Golden Gate Estates drainage basin, with
recommendations for future land use and water management
strategies . Tropical Bioindustries Development Co . 178 pp .
ATTACHMENT 5 : Water Management Dept.
Staff Report for Naples
Golf Estates.
1Ll..•1 A
WATER MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD
MEETING OF
JULY 13, 1988
I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT:
Manufactured Housing Associates, Inc.
Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soil & Peek, Inc.; Agent
Rezone Petition No. R-88-6C -- "Naples Golf Estates" P.U.D.
II. LOCATION:
Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 26 East; Southeast corner of the
intersection of CR-951 and SR-84.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
"Naples Golf Estates" is a planned community including a mixture of
residential uses, recreational, conservation, and water management
/"s facilities, and commercial facilities. There are 790 living units
scattered on 162 acres along the golf course that meanders between the
uplands that exist in this property.
Plan of Record: "Naples Golf Estates" Water Management Plan, Exhibit
'E'", prepared by Wilson, Miller, Barton, Soll & Peek, Inc. , dated
February 1988, no revision.
IV. STAFF COMMENTS:
Of the total project area of 614 acres, approximately 317 acres will be
retained as Conservation/Open Space in an unaltered condition. The
developed portion of the property will have a conventional surface
water management system to provide water quality & quantity treatment
of project runoff independent of the adjacent wetland systems.
Staff is greatly concerned that construction in this flood prone area
will adversely impact downstream properties because of the grossly
inadequate condition of the CR-951 borrow canal (Henderson Creek) .
Staff is recommending that the one mile wide strip along the east side
of CR-951 be removed from the designated urban area until the 2nd - 5 E4. i
year capital improvement program can properly upgrade the water
management outlet systems in this area.
Staff is also concerned about excess runoff reaching the CR-951 canal .
Petitioner shall ensure that the on-site detention system does not
t degrade the existing wetland systems by diverting sheetflow from the `
wetlands to the CR-951 canal.
E'er r4
t ,r ai s •. 1h_ 2 ,44!
s 3
Staff Report
"Naples Golf Estates" PLD
Pagg.
V. RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends denial of Rezone Petition No. R-88-6C -- "Naples Golf
Estates" P.U.D.
Should the W.M.A.B. disagree in this recommendation for denial, Staff
recommends that the following stipulations be placed upon their approval:
1. The water management system shall be redesigned to take
into consideration the loss of historical basin storage
on this property and to provide for zero discharge from
the project site.
2. Detailed site drainage plans reflecting revised
conceptual water management approval from S.F.W.M.D.
shall be submitted to W.M.A.B. for review and approval.
No construction permits shall be issued unless and until
approval of the proposed construction in accordance with
the submitted plans is granted by the W.M.A.B. and
S.F.W.M.D.
3. An Excavation Permit will be required for the proposed
lakes in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No.
88-26.
r
.-_ ,. -.L.4,•@«5"av�e
.. 'zT�rr. w�., . �:say.�rsay ...cv�.vm ..s...,.a.,-. a. ....,..--.......�..._.�.�e...,.�"c" �, -.,.T.. ., - -^- ;�.�%r».
..sw-_... ;�.. ,...-._,.r«.+..`arw,C:d "'S'. «�"-'.,�." .F +..i't!.A -....t'a3Y.'.166F. .± C.h�" ��'
� n y
,s1.4
l € r r- "arm- wr
'.C�t-4, { -u+s Fn worn r - sr— ka'S' m�` '+�s
4arF adxza�$G'_L l'rh € 5h