Loading...
EAC Agenda 05/04/2005 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL AGENDA May 4, 2005 /-� 9:00 A.M. Commission Boardroom W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F")—Third Floor I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Approval of Agenda IV. Approval of April 6, 2005 Meeting minutes V. Land Use Petitions A. Special Treatment Permit No. ST-2004-AR-6055 "Al-Khatib Single-Family Residence" Section 14, Township 51 South, Range 25 East B. Final Plat and Construction Plan No. PPL-2004-AR-6399 "3500 Corporate Plaza" Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East C. Site Development Plan No.SDP-2004-AR-6495 "TwinEagles Phase II" Sections 17 and 20,Township 48 South, Range 27 East D. Development of Regional Impact No. DRI-2004-AR-6293 P-0\ "The Town of Ave Maria" Sections 31-33, Township 47 South, Range 29 East Sections 4-9, 16-17 Township 47 South, Range 29 East Section 36, Township 47, Range 28 East VI. Old Business A. Haldeman Creek Restoration Project and Dredge Disposal Site (Results of the sediment testing for Haldeman Creek and a copy of the aerial photo identifying sampling locations are available upon request—cherirollins[a)colliergov.net) VII. New Business A. Oustanding Advisory Committee Member Nominations B. Discussion regarding potential subcommittee topics C. New Chairperson election VIII. Council Member Comments IX. Public Comments X. Adjournment ******************************************************************************************************** Council Members: Please notify the Environmental Services Department Administrative Assistant no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 28, 2005 if you cannot attend this meeting or if you have a conflict and will abstain from voting on a petition (403-2424). General Public: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Item V.A. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MEETING OF MAY 4, 2005 I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT: Petition No.: Special Treatment Permit No. ST-2004-AR-6055 Petition Name: Al-Khatib Single-Family Residence Applicant/Developer: Kathleen Al-Khatib Architectural Consultant: Barnett Design Studio, Inc. Environmental Consultant: Turrell &Associates, Inc. II. LOCATION: The subject property is a 1.9 acre parcel located on Keewaydin Island in Section 14, Township 51 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. III. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: Surrounding properties are mostly undeveloped with some single-family residences in the area. ZONING DESCRIPTION N- A-ST Undeveloped S - A-ST Undeveloped E - A-ST Water Channel W- N/A Gulf of Mexico IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The petitioner is proposing to construct a single-family residence with septic tank, drainfield, boardwalk, generator and propane tanks. Also on-site are an existing dock, chickee and boardwalk. EAC Meeting Page 2 of 8 V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element: The subject property is located within the Conservation Designated Area as identified on the countywide Future Land Use Map. The FLUE states, in part, "The Conservation Designation will accommodate limited residential development and future non-residential uses. The following uses are authorized in this Designation. a. For privately held lands, single family dwelling units ... at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per five gross acres ... " [if the subject property is legally non-conforming, and that is the presumption, the density may exceed the 1 DU/5 acres] "h. Essential Services necessary to serve permitted uses identified ... above such as ... septic tanks." Based upon the foregoing, Comprehensive Planning staff is of the opinion that the subject request is consistent with the FLUE. Conservation & Coastal Management Element: The project as proposed is consistent with the Policies and Objectives of the Conservation& Coastal Management Element, for the following reasons: As required in Policy 6.1.4, all prohibited exotic vegetation, as defined by County Code, shall be removed from the site and the site shall be maintained free of exotics in perpetuity. The requirement for an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)pursuant to Policy 6.1.8 has been satisfied. Jurisdictional wetlands have been identified as required in Policies 6.2.1 and 6.2.2. Pursuant to Policy 6.2.4, the County shall require appropriate agency permits prior to the issuance of a final local development order permitting site improvements. As stated in Policies 6.2.3 and 6.2.4, where permits issued by jurisdictional agencies allow for impacts to wetlands within the Urban Designated Area and require mitigation for such impacts, this shall be deemed to meet the objective of protection and conservation of wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands within this area. EAC Meeting Page 3 of 8 Pursuant to Policy 7.1.2 (2)(h),projects within 300 feet of the MHW line shall limit outdoor lighting to that necessary for security and safety, in order to protect sea turtles that nest on Collier County beaches. Floodlights and landscape or accent lighting shall be prohibited. Objective 10.3: "Undeveloped coastal barriers shall be maintained predominantly in their natural state and their natural function shall be protected, maintained and enhanced." Policy 10.3.2: "Any development activities on an undeveloped coastal barrier must be compatible with protection of the natural form and function of the coastal barrier system." Policy 10.3.5: "Native or other County approved vegetation shall be required as the stabilizing medium in any coastal barrier vegetation or restoration program." Policy 10.3.6: "Prohibit construction of structures seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line on undeveloped coastal barriers. Exception shall be for passive recreational structures, access crossovers, and where enforcement would not allow any reasonable economic utilization of such property. In the latter event, require construction that minimizes interference with natural function of such coastal barrier system." Policy 10.3.9: "Native vegetation on undeveloped coastal barriers should be preserved. To the extent that native vegetation is lost during land development activities and the remaining native vegetation can be supplemented without damaging or degrading its natural function, any native vegetation lost during construction shall be replaced by supplementing with compatible native vegetation on site. All exotic vegetation shall be removed and replaced with native vegetation where appropriate." Policy 10.3.13: "These policies shall be implemented through the existing"ST" zoning procedures." Policy 10.5.10: "Construction activities shall not interfere with the sea turtle nesting, shall preserve or replace any native vegetation on the site, and shall maintain the natural beach profile and minimize interference with the natural beach dynamics and function." Policy 10.5.12: "For 11 beach front land development related projects require dune stabilization an restoration improvements, the removal of exotic vegetation, �"� and replacement wit native vegetation, as appropriate." EAC Meeting Page 4 of 8 The project is consistent with the Policies and Objectives in Goal 10 in that the natural function of the coastal barrier and native vegetation on the site are maintained, and any native vegetation impacted during construction will be re- planted on site. VI. MAJOR ISSUES: Environmental: Site Description: The subject property is undeveloped with the exception of an existing chickee, boardwalk and dock. Native habitats on-site include cabbage palm/hardwood forest (FLUCFCS Code 428), coastal scrub (FLUCFCS Code 322) and Mangrove (FLUCFCS Code 612). Also on-site is an existing disturbed area where exotic vegetation(Australian pine) has been removed. Wetlands: Jurisdictional wetlands occur on the easterly most portion of the property and consist of 0.03 acres of mangrove forest. The mangroves are part of a larger fringe of mangroves along the eastern side of Keewaydin Island. No impacts to wetlands are proposed with this project. A boat dock already exists on-site and was permitted through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in February 2001. Preservation Requirements/Site Alteration: Native vegetation preservation requirements pursuant to Policy 6.1.1 of the Growth Management Plan Conservation and Coastal Management Element and the Land Development Code do not apply to single-family residences situated on individual parcels. The proposed residence will alter less than fifteen percent of the total site and will be elevated on pilings. All native vegetation outside of the development footprint will be retained (or restored if disturbed during construction). Listed Species: A transect survey was performed to determine the presence of listed species. There were two listed species observed on or adjacent to the subject property during the survey. A group of hand ferns were observed adjacent to the site and 11 active and 3 inactive gopher tortoise burrows were located on-site. EAC Meeting Page 5 of 8 The hand ferns will remain undisturbed by the proposed house construction. To insure that they are protected, the trees will be marked and roped off to protect them from any potential incidental impacts by construction workers. The gopher tortoise burrows will also be marked and protected from construction activities. Occupied burrows within the house footprint will be excavated and any tortoises found will be moved outside of the building footprint. Fencing will be placed around the construction zone to prevent tortoises from entering the construction area. The fencing will also serve to contain construction activities to a delineated area to help minimize impacts to surrounding vegetation. Consultation with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission will be initiated and pursued regarding activities concerning gopher tortoises. Material and equipment will be delivered outside of sea turtle nesting season. The beach and dune area will be fully restored after construction. VII. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of Special Treatment Permit No. ST-2004-AR-6055 "Al-Khatib Single-Family Residence"with the following stipulations: Environmental: 1. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy(CO) all exotic vegetation, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, shall be removed from the property. 2. All proposed improvements shall be designed in accordance with the standards of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Division of Beaches and Shores and an approved FDEP permit shall be obtained, and copies provided, prior to issuance of a Collier County Building Permit. 3. The existing chickee and surrounding wood deck shall be removed from the site or relocated landward of the County Coastal Construction Setback Line (CCSL)within 30 days of issuance of this Special Treatment Permit. 4. Outdoor lighting associated with construction, or development within three hundred (300) feet of the high tide line, shall be in compliance with Section 3.04.00 of the Collier County Land Development Code. EAC Meeting Page 6 of 8 5. Construction activities shall not occur within one hundred (100) feet of the sea turtle nesting zone, defined by Collier County Land Development Code Section 3.04.00, between May 1 - October 31, sea turtle nesting season, without first submitting and obtaining FDEP and Collier County Construction in Sea Turtle Nesting Area Permits. 6. Petitioner shall re-vegetate the dune where the dune is devoid of coastal dune vegetation (appropriate to that specific area i.e. fore-dune or back dune). A Coastal Construction Setback Line Permit (CCSLP) shall be submitted and approved by Collier County Current Planning Environmental Staff,prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 7. Petitioner shall utilize only native southern Floridian species for all on-site landscaping. 8. Petitioner shall submit copies of all necessary agency permits (i.e. FFWCC for Gopher tortoise) prior to any site improvements or obtaining any building permits. 1 r� EAC Meeting Page 7 of 8 PREPARED BY: STEPHEN LENBERGER DATE ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT 9/7/0 s diriCHELE MO :!AICP DATE PRINCIPAL P R COMPREHENSIVE DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: BARBARA S. BURGES DATE PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT 04-i6-o5 I LIAM D. LO NZ, ., P.E., DIRECTOR, DATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT EAC Meeting Page 8 of 8 SAN MURRAY, AICP, D I' rf OR, ATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: 4 - J• ` PH K. SCHMITT, ADMINISTRATOR, A �iMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT &ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION II Item V.B ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MEETING OF May 4, 2005 I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT: Petition No.: Final Plat and Construction Plans No.PPL-2004-AR-6399 Petition Name: 3500 Corporate Plaza Applicant/Developer: Pine Ridge Investors of Naples, Inc. Engineering Consultant: Q. Grady Minor and Assoc. Environmental Consultant: Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc. II. LOCATION: There are two subject parcels which are under common ownership and are in two separate zoning districts. Both are zoned PUD and located next to one another on the south side of Pine Ridge Road. The first is Pine Ridge Center, which is located approximate 700 feet west of Whipporwill Lane, and the other is Pine Ridge Center West which is approximately 1000 feet west of Whipporwill Lane. Pine Ridge Center is further described as Parcel 31, Folio number 0287520002, located in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Pine Ridge Center West PUD is further described as Parcel 33, Folio number 00287400009, located in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. III. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: SURROUNDING: North: Pine Ridge Road then a Hotel and retail uses, zoned PUD East: Vacant, zoned PUD, Pine View PUD South: Hospice of Naples, zoned CF West: Good Earth Drive and vacant property zoned 'A' Rural Agricultural IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pine Ridge Center and Pine Ridge Center West PUDs were amended on February 27, 2001, to add uses such as building construction, building materials and similar use that were not previously allowed in the two PUDs. The two PUDs were rezoned as separate projects, but have a common 60-foot wide shared access and have identical permitted EAC Meeting Page 2 of 8 uses and development standards. The PUDs are now under common ownership and it is the owner's intent to develop these PUDs as a unified project. In order to develop the two PUD's as a unified project the owners requested and were granted side yard variances from the shared interior side yard in order to be able to construct a office building across the property line on the south end of the property. It is the owner's belief that a unified development on both PUDs will result in more efficient utilization of the property, and a more cohesive and unified plan of development. V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element: The subject property is designated Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict (Activity Center #10), as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Relevant to this petition, this Subdistrict permits the full array of commercial uses, residential and non-residential uses, institutional uses and hotel/motel uses. Therefore,the actual use is consistent with the Future Land Use Map. Based upon the above analysis, staff concludes that the proposed use for the subject site is consistent with the Future Land Use Element. Conservation & Coastal Management Element: Objective 2.2. of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan states "All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall meet all applicable federal, state, or local water quality standards". To accomplish that, policy 2.2.2 states "In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of stormwater runoff, stormwater systems should be designed in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an attempt is made to enhance the timing, quantity, and quality of fresh water(discharge) to the estuarine system". This project is consistent with the objectives of policy 2.2.2 in that it attempts to mimic or enhance the quality and quantity of water leaving the site by utilizing detention areas and interconnected wetlands to provide water quality retention and peak flow attenuation during storm events This project is consistent with Policy 6.1.1 whereas the standards and criteria have been met to preserve and recreate native vegetation on-site, by providing greater than 15% indigenous vegetation for commercial development. The total site preservation exceeds that required by the PUD. n I EAC Meeting Page 3 of 8 Jurisdictional wetlands have been identified as required in Policies 6.2.1 and 6.2.2. Pursuant to Policy 6.2.4, the County shall require appropriate agency permits prior to the issuance of a final local development order permitting site improvements (Site Development Plan). As stated in Policies 6.2.3 and 6.2.4, where permits issued by jurisdictional agencies allow for impacts to wetlands within the Urban Designated Area and require mitigation for such impacts, this shall be deemed to meet the objective of protection and conservation of wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands within this area. In accordance with Policy 6.1.1.(2), preserved native vegetation will include canopy, under-story, and groundcover. The creation areas also include plants in each of the three strata. The preserve areas have been designed to best accommodate the onsite wetlands, keep the preserve interconnected as best possible that the water management system allows for. This project is consistent with Policy 6.1.1.(7) whereas because the site cannot fully accommodate both the preservation area and proposed water management, the landscape plan has recreated a native plant community within the water management areas, utilizing larger plant materials to more quickly recreate the lost mature vegetation which will occur during the clearing, filling, and regrading areas in order to meet the preservation ,-� requirements. This project is consistent with Policy 6.1.1.(9) whereas there are no adjacent preserves, conservation acquisition areas, flowways or potential wildlife corridors exist in this area or around the project site. Roads and development exists along the north and south boundaries of the site. The west is undeveloped residential, and the area to the east is undeveloped. The preserve areas have been designed to best accommodate the onsite wetlands, keep the preserve interconnected as best possible the water management system allows, and take into consideration the neighboring properties. Brynwood Preserve area is located to the southwest of the site. This preserve allows for a connection to the neighboring properties for potential future preserve areas that may be located on either side, and provides adjacency to the nearest offsite preserve. The requirement for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to Policy 6.1.8 has been satisfied. A wildlife survey for listed species in accordance with Policy 7.1.2 is included in the Environmental Impact Statement(EIS). No listed species have been observed on-site. EAC Meeting Page 4 of 8 VI. MAJOR ISSUES: Stormwater Management: Corporate Plaza (Pine Ridge Center) is at the north end of a wide shallow slough that flows south toward an east-west interceptor canal about a mile away that carries the discharge from Kensington toward the west to the I-75 canal. The slough appears to have extended farther north, but two decades ago it was cut by Pine Ridge Road and its roadside swales. Topography shows flow to the south through section 18. The project sits in the I-75 Canal Basin. The allowable discharge rate within that basin is 0.015 cfs per acre. When rezonings began in the "Whippoorwill" section a few years ago, it was decided that all infrastructure would be designed prior to allowing any rezoning. It was also decided that any project of any consequence within the section would go to SFWMD for permitting, even if it didn't meet the 40 acre criterion. This project would go to SFWMD for permitting anyway because of the presence of wetlands. ,.� Environmental: Site Description: The project site contains 0.96 acres of wetlands, 0.23 acres of agricultural ditches (surface waters) and 15.90 acres of uplands. There are two wetlands onsite, one a pine-cypress- cabbage palm wetland (0.42 acres) near the western property boundary and the other a hydric pine flatwoods (0.54 acres) on the east side that extends offsite (0.34 acres). The majority of the remainder of the site comprises pine flatwoods, although unimproved pasture areas and a palmetto prairie are located in the northern portion of the site. The property is adjacent to undeveloped land to the east and west, Pine Ridge Rd. to the north, and Hospice of Naples to the South. Wetlands: The proposed site plan will impact the .54 acre hydric pine flatwoods to the east. Mitigation will be provided for this wetland offsite in its entirety (including the offsite portion) as permitted through SFWMD. The .42 acre pine-cypress-cabbage palm wetland will be preserved, enhanced, and incorporated into the projects surface water management system. In order to offset the direct wetland impacts, onsite and offsite mitigation will be provided. The onsite mitigation will include the preservation and enhancement of the EAC Meeting Page 5 of 8 pine-cypress-cabbage wetland and also a portion of the uplands for buffering per the SFWMD permit. The offsite mitigation will be purchased at Panther Island Mitigation Bank(within the same drainage basin). No adverse secondary or cumulative impacts are anticipated as a result of this development and no adverse water quality or discharge impacts are anticipated. Preservation Requirements: The property contains about 10.86 acres of native vegetation. This includes Palmetto Prairie (1.13 ac), Pine Flatwoods (9.9 ac), Pine-Cypress wetlands (0.42 ac), and Hydric Pine Flatwoods (0.54 ac). The approved PUDs required 2.64 acres needed for preservation, including at least 1.02 acres of indigenous preserve to be retained, and up to 1.62 acres to be replanted. The project development proposes to preserve .42 acres of wetlands, 1.23 acres of uplands, and 1.44 acres are to be replanted in the dry detention area,which exceeds the required amount in the PUD. The 1.44 acre portion of the upland preserve that overlaps with the dry detention area will be cleared, filled, replanted, and utilized as part of the dry detention and stormwater r-� treatment. Storm water runoff will be directed into the proposed dry detention surface water management system via catch basins and culverts for pretreatment prior to overflow into the existing wetland system. This includes the use of 27 foot wide berms and 5 %2 foot high retaining walls within the creation areas to achieve the appropriate hydrology for water quality, and hydrological enhancement of the wetland preserves. The areas which encompass the wall areas are not included in the preserve calculations. All slopes and areas on berms within the dry detention area will be planted with native vegetation. These areas are noted on the site plans. The remaining .42 acres of wetlands and 1.23 acres of uplands will be retained as preserve with no clearing or regrading. Listed Species: Environmental scientists from Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc. conducted the listed species survey in June and July 2003. Overlapping belt transects, approximately 10 to 50 feet apart were walked, depending on the density of the vegetation. In addition, periodic stop-look-listens techniques were utilized to observe potential listed species. No listed species were observed. The applicant is proposing to follow the "Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake" during construction. There should be no impacts to the Eastern Indigo Snake. During the investigation a tree-to-tree survey was conducted for the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker and no cavities or signs of utilization were observed. EAC Meeting Page 6 of 8 VII. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of 3500 Corporate Plaza PPL with the following stipulations: Stormwater Management: 1. An Environmental Resource Permit from the South Florida Water Management District must be obtained prior to approval of any construction plans. Environmental: No additional stipulations. il, ... � . ` * fi' �" �" t" ' \ �J $ ,ir. y rj• T g , . r -4, ,`4:' 44..h '.;At/ `. 'A t .,„....... ..... ,, ,..„.„ . ,,, . 4'pi' C. . (....„,.. .. , .. . , . .,,,, - e titt. ' A '41tt.' Irr :A t �+i►;; A. .:' iY,� r . :his ' ,,, :, ,' 4,: • 3500 Corporate Plaza on-site pine flatwoods(FLUCFCS 411). ---............. ,y . - - :: ___.;:ii-i,,_, -','";„---_-_, , ,, imm �., ''.. .�_ �" ;:.� "-��"- ' AVM Oi118hVf e .., ,.. .01; 4 } ''> slot -&VM NOSMV 1 'W w A 0 } 4 W10 _ AU 0 ..„ 10 3na3S3LI -` -- -- - N-1.111NkJOOd- HM. a i, ditl: z iiiiiiiiiii'c�l Ms T Z 11114110/11!11!!1/111!1 Z -.s iib . - MI AI BOW INN O >— — EV 3m. Aga Li � .dm Lo Lo oi o) xi , n o ON NO1S`JNInn S-,JN N01SON A:1 Q d 7 0 � ? m 0 0 m iiiinn','< of co � I ,� ' I EAC Meeting Page 7 of 8 PREPARED BY: 1 /AV fif 18 OW 05 STAN CHRZANOWSKI, P. . DATE ENGINEERING REVIEW MANAGER -tt(-461/4 V) /,Y C)1; CRISTINA SANCHEZ° DATE ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST • 115•0 r ROB E VER DATE PRIN ' P AL PLANNER EAC Meeting Page 8 of 8 REVIEWED BY: /3bCLA /� ,. o" BARBARA S. BURGESON DATE PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT C44-/8-05- "itT I LIAM D. L NZ, J ., P.E., DIRECTOR DATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT iiAr SAN MURRAY, AICP, D OR DA E DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: JO.EPH K. SC T AT CIMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES • MINISTRATOR Item V.C. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MEETING OF May 4, 2005 I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT: Petition No.: Site Development Plan No. SDP-2004- AR-6495 Petition Name: "Twin Eagle Phase II Golf Course" Applicant/Developer: Resource Conservation Properties Engineering Consultant: Agnoli, Barber and Brundage, Environmental Consultant: WilsonMiller II. LOCATION: The proposed golf course is located in Section 17, Township 48 South, Range 27 East approximately 3/a mile north of Immokalee Road (C.R. 846). The entire project encompasses approximately 643.96 acres. III. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: Surrounding properties include undeveloped land, single-family residences and agricultural type uses. ZONING DESCRIPTION North: Estates Widely scattered single-family homesites South: Agricultural-MHO Existing Phase 1 Twin Eagle Golf and Country Club East: Estates Widely scattered single-family homesites West: Agricultural-MHO Existing Bonita Bay East Course IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The petitioner has submitted a site development plan (SDP) petition for approval of a golf course. The proposed TwinEagles Phase 2 Golf Course will be located immediately north of the existing TwinEagles Golf & Country Club, within an EAC Meeting Page 2 of 10 area that is designated Agricultural/Rural, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands on the Collier County Future Land Use Map (FLUM). V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element: The proposed development is located in the Agricultural/Rural Designation, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands, as depicted on Collier County's Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The Collier County Future Land Use Element (FLUE) contains specific requirements for new development within Receiving Lands. In particular, the FLUE contains criteria relative to new golf courses within the Receiving Lands. These are as follows: Note: In the following review, FLUE provisions are shown in bold type and staff recommendations are shown in italic type. Rural Fringe Mixed Use Element Policy II B 1 A) Receiving Lands: 5. Permitted Uses: Uses within Receiving Lands are limited to the following: (Note: This list only includes requirements applicable to this development.) k) Golf courses or driving ranges, subject to the following standards: (1) The minimum density shall be as follows: a. For golf course projects utilizing Density Blending Provisions set forth in the Density Rating System of the FLUE: one (1) dwelling unit per five (5) gross acres. The proposed development does not qualify for the FLUE's Density Blending Provisions, as it does not straddle the boundary between the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands and the Urban Designation. b. For golf course projects not utilizing Density Blending Provisions, including freestanding golf courses: the minimum density shall be one (1) dwelling unit per five (5) gross acres, and one additional dwelling unit per five (5) gross acres for the land area utilized as part of the golf course, including the clubhouse area, rough, fairways, greens, and lakes, but excluding any area dedicated as conservation, which is non-irrigated and retained in a natural state. The additional required density for such golf course development shall be achieved by acquiring TDRs from Sending Lands. Essentially, the above provision requires golf course developments within Receiving Lands, with or without a residential component, to purchase 1 TDR credit for every five acres of golf course developed. The acreage of the proposed golf course is approximately 605 acres. Therefore, this golf course would require purchase of 121 TDR Credits. Staff notes that TDRs purchased to enable the golf course expansion could be utilized for residential development, subject to the residential provisions EAC Meeting Page 3 of 10 contained within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands Designation Description Section of the FLUE. (2) Golf courses shall be designed, constructed, and managed in accordance with Audubon International's Gold Signature Program. The proposed golf course area associated with TwinEagles Phase Two is a second 18-hole course that will be operated from the existing TwinEagles Country Club facility. The expansion portion of the course needs to comply with the Audubon Gold Signature Program. The Audubon International Organization provides the following regarding the Gold Signature Program: "This designation is reserved for members who establish a partnership with Audubon International prior to the siting and design of the project. A team of experts from the Audubon International Institute prepares an Environmental Master Plan for all aspects of the property, including site-specific strategies for natural resource management, architecture, sustainable building and infrastructure, landscaping, and community education. "Gold" level projects involve on going monitoring and research and require a long-term commitment to showcase principles and practices of environmental sustainability." The Petitioner must demonstrate compliance with this provision. (3) In order to prevent the contamination of soil, surface water and ground water by the materials stored and handled by golf course maintenance operations, golf courses shall comply with the Best Management Practices for Golf Course Maintenance Departments,prepared by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, May 1995. The Petitioner must demonstrate compliance with this provision. (4) To protect ground and surface water quality from fertilizer and pesticide usage, golf courses shall demonstrate the following management practices: (a) The use of slow release nitrogen sources; (b) The use of soil and plant tissue analysis to adjust timing and amount of fertilization applications; (c) The use of an integrated pest management program using both biological and chemical agents to control various pests; (d) The coordination of pesticide applications with the timing and application of irrigation water; (e) The use of the procedure contained in IFAS Circular 1011, Managing Pesticides for Golf Course Maintenance and Water Quality Protection, May 1991 (revised 1995) to select pesticides that will have a minimum adverse impact on water quality. The Petitioner must demonstrate compliance with these requirements. EAC Meeting Page 4 of 10 (5) To ensure water conservation, golf courses shall incorporate the following in their design and operation: (a) Irrigation systems shall be designed to use weather station information and moisture-sensing systems to determine the optimum amount of irrigation water needed considering soil moisture and evapotranspiration rates. (b) As available, golf courses shall utilize treated effluent reuse water consistent with Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element Objective 1.4 and its policies. (c) Native plants shall be used exclusively except for special purpose areas such as golf greens, fairways, and building sites. Within these excepted areas, landscaping plans shall require that at least 75% of the trees and 50% of the shrubs be freeze-tolerant native Floridian species. At least 75% of the required native trees and shrubs shall also be drought tolerant species. The Petitioner must demonstrate compliance with these requirements. (6) Stormwater management ponds shall be designed to mimic the functions of natural systems: by establishing shorelines that are sinuous in configuration in order to provide increased length and diversity of the littoral zone. A Littoral Shelf shall be established to provide a feeding area for water dependent avian species. The combined length of vertical and riprapped walls shall be limited to 25% of the shoreline. Credits to the site preservation area requirements, on an acre-to-acre basis, shall be given for littoral shelves that exceed these littoral shelf area requirements. The Petitioner must demonstrate compliance with these requirements. (7) Site preservation and native vegetation retention requirements shall be the same as those set forth in CCME Policy 6.1.2. These areas are intended to provide habitat functions and shall meet minimum dimensions as set forth in the Land Development Code. These standards shall be established within one year. LDC site preservation standards for Receiving Lands are contained in Section 3.05.07.C, of the Collier County Land Development Code. The Petitioner must demonstrate compliance with the standards contained within Section 3.05.07.C, of the LDC. m) Open Space and Native Vegetation Preservation Requirements: a. Usable Open Space: Within Receiving Lands projects greater than 40 acres in size shall provide a minimum of 70% usable open space. Usable Open Space includes active or passive recreation areas such as parks, playgrounds, golf courses, waterways, lakes, nature trails, and EAC Meeting Page 5 of 10 other similar open spaces. Usable Open Space shall also include areas set aside for conservation or preservation of native vegetation and landscape areas. Open water beyond the perimeter of the site, street right-of-way, except where dedicated or donated for public uses, driveways, off-street parking, and loading areas, shall not be counted towards required Usable Open Space. b. Native Vegetation Preservation: Native vegetation shall be preserved as set forth in CCME Policy 6.1.2. The TwinEagles Phase Two Development is required to comply with the above provisions. In order to do so, the petitioner needs to provide information as to the nature and size of the area, or areas that the project proposes to utilize as Usable Open Space. The proposed additional golf course could be utilized in such fashion. Should the proposed golf course be equivalent to less than 70% of the total project acreage, the petitioner must supply information as to the nature and acreage of the remaining "usable open space. " Conservation & Coastal Management Element: Objective 2.2. of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan states "All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall meet all applicable federal, state, or local water quality standards". To accomplish that, policy 2.2.2 states "In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of stormwater runoff, stormwater systems should be designed in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an attempt is made to enhance the timing, quantity, and quality of fresh water(discharge)to the estuarine system". This project is consistent with the objectives of policy 2.2.2 in that it attempts to mimic or enhance the quality and quantity of water leaving the site by utilizing lakes, retention and detention areas, and interconnected wetlands to provide water quality retention and peak flow attenuation during storm events. Policy 6.1.2 states that native vegetation shall be preserved on site through the application of the following preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria: In Receiving Lands, a minimum of 40% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 25% of the total site area shall be preserved. This project has exceeded that requirement by preserving over 124 acres of the native vegetation existing on site that is the best quality and when possible adjoins off-site preservation lands. Conservation easements prohibiting further development will be required prior to SDP approval. Policy 6.2.5 requires habitat management and exotic vegetation removal/maintenance plans at the time of Site Development Plan/Construction Plan submittal. Preserve areas shall be required to be maintained free of Category I invasive exotic plants,as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. These plans have been provided as part of the construction plans for this Site Development Plan. EAC Meeting Page 6 of 10 Jurisdictional wetlands have been identified as required in Policies 6.2.1 and 6.2.5. Policy 6.2.5 encourages certain types of mitigation by providing a variety of incentives in the form of density bonuses and credits to open space and vegetation retention requirements. The applicant has chosen to enhance and restore wading bird habitat on site that is located near woodstork, and other wading bird colonies in order to reduce the littoral planting shelf requirements of the RFMU from 30%to 15% over the lake surface area.. A wildlife survey for listed species in accordance with Policy 7.1.2 is included in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species are part of the Site Development Plans submitted. VI. MAJOR ISSUES: Stormwater Management: The water management system for Twin Eagles consists of 27 interconnected lakes discharging from three water control structures. Lakes 1 & 3 discharge to the south into the same existing preserve, and lake 23 discharges to the east into an existing canal. The system is designed to achieve water quality attenuation and peak flow attenuation by storing the runoff and discharging it after a sufficient amount of residence time. Extensive calculations were submitted showing compliance with the methodology developed by Dr.Harvey Harper. The project is presently being reviewed for an Environmental Resource Permit by the South Florida Water Management District. Environmental: Site Description: The subject property is approximately 644 acres surrounded by scattered single-family homes to the north and east, to the west is the Bonita Bay East golf course and agricultural zoned lands and to the south is Twin Eagles Phase I residential and golf course development. The land consists of mostly previously cleared agricultural land used in the past for sod production and is currently used for cattle grazing. Approximately 124 acres of native vegetation currently exist on site. The native areas consist of 114.55 acres of cypress forest, 9 acres of freshwater marsh and 0.79 acres of cabbage palm hammock. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil map for the area identifies the following soil types on site: Ft Drum & Malabar high fine soil; Boca fine sand; Boca, Riviera, Limestone substratum and Copeland fine sand (hydric); Chobee, Winder and Gator soils, depressional (hydric); and Holopaw fine sand(hydric). The vast majority of the site is hydric soils. EAC Meeting Page 7 of 10 Wetlands: South Florida Water Management District has claimed 169.5 acres of wetlands on site. Of the 169.5 acres, 30.75 acres (approximately 18%) are proposed to be impacted. The wetland areas to be impacted consist of over 25 acres of disturbed or agricultural fields and almost 5 acres of cypress forest and disturbed freshwater marsh. The remainder of the existing wetlands will be preserved and the applicant will be creating a 3.59 acre Flowway/wildlife corridor on the southwest border of the project. Preservation Requirements: The RFMU district requires 40% of native vegetation to be preserved on site. Forty percent of vegetation on site is 49.8 acres. The applicant has requested a reduction in the required littoral planting shelf(LPSA) area that is allowed according to LDC 3.05.7 that states a 50%reduction in required littoral zone requirements may be granted for projects that create, enhance or restore wading bird habitat to be located near wood stork, and/or other wading bird colonies, in an amount that is equal to, or greater than 50% of the on- site native vegetation preservation acreage required, or 20% of the overall project size, whichever is greater. The applicant has proposed preserving and enhancing an additional 87 acres of wetlands to qualify for the LPSA reduction. The applicant is proposing a total of 149 acres of existing and created preservation on site with an additional 7.12 acres immediately adjacent to Preserve#1 and CREW lands. Listed Species: Listed species surveys have been conducted on this site in 1996, 1997, and 2002-2005. The following listed species have been observed onsite: little blue heron, tricolored heron, white ibis, snowy egret, wood stork, reddish egret, Florida sandhill crane, Big Cypress fox squirrel, American alligator, common wild-pine, fuzzy wuzzy air plant, twisted wild pine, butterfly orchid, giant wild pine, narrow strap fern and rigid epidendrum. Other This site has been in agriculture use for many decades. Sod production and cattle grazing were two primary uses. Sludge containing septage, grease, portable toilet contents and sewage treatment plant sludge was spread in many areas of the Twin Eagles development. According to Collier County Pollution Control and Prevention Department, part of the southwest corner of section 17 was used for this purpose. Analysis of samples obtained from monitoring wells in the area at the time has not revealed any contamination on site or in areas surrounding the disposal sites. EAC Meeting Page 8 of 10 VII. RECOMMENDATIONS: Stormwater: An Environmental Resource Permit from the South Florida Water Management District must be obtained prior to approval of any construction plans. Environmental: Listed plant species found in areas to be impacted shall be relocated to similar habits in preservation areas on site prior to clearing those areas. EAC Meeting Page 9 of 10 PREPARED BY: of,44.. STAN CHRZANOWSKI� DATE ENGINEERING REVIEW MANAGER ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT US N MASON DATE ' OR ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT KOA /0,0,641/C/ q-4-105 KAY VESELEM, A.I.C.P. DATE PRINCIPAL PLANNER DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW EAC Meeting Page 10 of 10 REVIEWED BY: 6414,eu& - A7 BARBARA S. BURGESON DATE PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST -/ r c' 1/1 LIAM D. LO Z, Jr., P.E. DATE E IRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR le/9/0j- USAN 9`©j USAN MURRAY, AICP DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: - • � `� lg/OSS JO:EPH K. SCHMITT D TE C•MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT &ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES • 'MINISTRATOR Item V.D. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MEETING OF May 4, 2005 I. NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT: Petition No.: Development of Regional Impact No. DRI-2004-AR-6293 Petition Name: "The Town of Ave Maria" Applicant/Developer: New Town Development, LLLP Engineering Consultant: WilsonMiller, Inc. Environmental Consultant: WilsonMiller, Inc. II. LOCATION: The subject property is located on the north side of Oil Well Road, the east side of Camp Keais Road and approximately 6,000 feet south of Immokalee Road (CR-846). The property lies within Sections 4-9 & 16-17, Township 48 South, Range 29 East; Sections 31-33 Township 47 South, Range 29 East; and Section 36,Township 47 South,Range 28 East; III. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: Zoning and land use: North: Ag-MHO—Water Retention Area(WRA)and active agriculture South: Ag-MHO—Oil Well Road and active agriculture East: Ag-MHO—Camp Keais Road and active agriculture West: Ag-MHO—WRA and Camp Keais Strand IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The petitioner is requesting a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) for the "Town of Ave Maria". The Town will encompass 5027+ acres and will consist of residential neighborhoods, a mixed-use town center, a Community Facilities District, Wetland Preserve Areas and parklands. The Town will include the following land uses: o 11,000 residential dwelling units o 690,000 square feet of retail/service space o 510,000 square feet of office o 400 hotel rooms o 6,000 student University i"• o 450 Assisted Living Units o 35,000 square feet of medical facilities, o Public and private schools o Recreational facilities and parks. EAC Meeting Page 2 of 10 A total of 72 acres are intended for public use. V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: The subject property is designated Agricultural/Rural (Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay {RLSA}). Relevant to this Overlay, the planning strategies and techniques include urban villages, new towns, satellite communities, area-based allocations clustering and open space provisions, and mixed-use development that allow the conversion of rural and agricultural lands to other uses while protecting environmentally sensitive areas, maintaining the economic viability of agricultural and other predominantly rural land uses, and providing for the cost-efficient delivery of public facilities and services. Specifically, the Overlay allows development in the form of a Town, Village, Hamlet or Compact Rural Development, subject to certain criteria and development parameters, as a Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA), and allows, "public benefit uses"such as a post-secondary institution. DRI Application Review: FLUE Policy 5.4 provides that all new development must be compatible with and complimentary to surrounding land uses. Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to Zoning and Land Development Review staff as part of their review of the petition in its totality. Policy 4.17 requires fiscal neutrality by the horizon year, as demonstrated by cost/benefit fiscal analysis. A separate review by this department will consider the consistency of the application with Policy 4.17. RLSA Policy 4.7.1 requires the provision of "a full range of housing types" within a Town. The Town Plan presented allows a wide range of housing types. Table 1 on page 2 of the Introduction provides a breakdown between multifamily and single family dwellings. The commitment to provide a specific number of moderate, low income and very low income housing units remains a requirement of DRI approval, and fulfills the requirements of Policy 4.7.1. The private school (K-12) is shown as a public benefit use (pgs. 13, 175). Staff concurs with this interpretation of public benefit use as it may be considered a Post Secondary Institution Ancillary use as defined in the LDC. RLSA Attachment C requires a wide range of Civic, Governmental and Institutional Services at a minimum of 15 s.f./DU. Tab 1, page 2 of the Application shows a total of 148,500 s.f. as "civic" use, whereas 165,000 s.f. would be required. However, when combined with the Oratory, itself a civic use, a total of 224,000 s.f. is provided,well in excess of the requirement. The Credit information under Tab 7 indicates that 28,658.4 credits are required for SRA approval. Based on the numbers provided for gross acres(5,027),public benefit use (1027 acres) and excess open space (417.7 acres), staff agrees with this calculation. EAC Meeting Page 3 of 10 Policy 4.8 states that an SRA may be contiguous to a Flowway Stewardship Area (FSA) or Habitat Stewardship Area (HAS), but shall not encroach into such areas, and shall buffer such areas as described in Policy 4.13. An SRA may be contiguous to and served by a WRA without requiring the WRA to be designated as a SRA in accordance with Policy 3.12 and 3.13. This project as designed does not encroach into any FSA,HAS or WRA and also complies with buffering requirements. Policy 4.9 requires that to further direct development away from wetlands and critical habitat, residential, commercial, manufacturing/light industrial, group housing, and transient housing, institutional, civic and community service uses within a SRA shall not be sited on lands that receive a Natural Resource Index value of greater than 1.2. In addition, conditional use essential services and governmental essential services, with the exception of those necessary to serve permitted uses and for public safety, shall not be sited on lands that receive a Natural Resource Index value of greater than 1.2. The Index value of greater than 1.2 represents those areas that have a high natural resource value as measured pursuant to Policy 1.8. None of the proposed DRI received a score of greater than 1.2 and is therefore consistent with this policy. Policy 4.12 requires that where a SRA adjoins a FSA, HSA, WRA or existing public or private conservation land delineated on the Overlay Map, best management and planning practices shall be applied to minimize adverse impacts to such lands. SRA design shall demonstrate that ground water table draw down or diversion will not adversely impact the adjacent FSA, HSA, WRA or conservation land. This project is consistent with this policy in that the proposed withdrawals for potable water supply and irrigation will be less than the agricultural withdrawals that are currently permitted for the site. Policy 4.13 requires that open space within or contiguous to a SRA shall be used to provide a buffer between the SRA and any adjoining FSA, HSA, or existing public or private conservation land delineated on the Overlay Map. Open space contiguous to or within 300 feet of the boundary of a FSA, HSA, or existing public or private conservation land may include: natural preserves, lakes, golf courses provided no fairways or other turf areas are allowed within the first 200 feet, passive recreational areas and parks, required yard and set-back areas, and other natural or manmade open space. The master plan for this site is consistent with these buffering requirements. Conservation & Coastal Management Element: Objective 2.2. of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan states "All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall meet all applicable federal, state, or local water quality standards". To accomplish that, policy 2.2.2 states "In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of stormwater runoff, stormwater systems should be EAC Meeting Page 4 of 10 designed in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an attempt is made to enhance the timing, quantity, and quality of fresh water(discharge)to the estuarine system". This project is consistent with the objectives of policy 2.2.2 in that it attempts to mimic or enhance the quality and quantity of water leaving the site by utilizing lakes, retention and detention areas, and interconnected wetlands to provide water quality retention and peak flow attenuation during storm events. CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis, staff is of the opinion that the proposed DRI for the Town of Ave Maria may be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. VI. MAJOR ISSUES: Stormwater Management: The site of the Town and University of Ave Maria sits on high ground between the Okaloacoochee Slough to the east and the Corkscrew Marsh to the west, on land that shows on the 1940 soils survey of Collier County as Camp "Keasis" Strand. On the 1990 soil survey, Corkscrew Marsh (slough) shows as Camp Keais Strand. Judging from the topography, the land slopes and drains to low ground all around Ave Maria. The general overland flow in this area, as in all of Collier County, is to the South or South-Southwest. This project will do nothing to interrupt that flow pattern. The county's FEMA study consultant, Tomasello Consulting Engineers, is including Ave Maria in their Base Flood Elevation study of Western Collier County. The results of that study will be a map of the 100 year flood plain elevations throughout the area. This project has also received an Environmental Resource Permit from the South Florida Water Management District. The project uses a standard system of interconnected lakes, swales, retention/detention areas and wetlands to achieve water quality detention and retention and peak flow attenuation prior to discharge into the surrounding sloughs. Environmental: Site Description: The subject property consists of 4995 acres of mostly intensive agricultural acreage. Land use consists of row crops, improved and unimproved pasture and other agriculture related uses interspersed with small areas of native vegetation. A FLUCFCS map detailing land use is contained under Tab 9, Map F-1. The site consists of both uplands and wetlands. Detailed descriptions of the various EAC Meeting Page 5 of 10 land use categories are given in Part III, tab 12. It should be noted that exotic code modifiers used comply with SFWMD standards, however they are not consistent with the County's definition of native habitat being <75% exotics in the canopy. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil map for the area identifies 13 soil types within the boundaries of this project. The soils map can be found under Tab 9,Map E. The applicant has submitted an aerial map labeled "Soil Testing Sites", however no soil sampling or ground water monitoring reports or programs have been submitted to demonstrate if any pesticide, herbicide or petroleum contamination exists on site. The applicant has provided an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre- development conditions entitled "Ave Maria Town and University Water Quality Investigation". The summary of results shows that the Post-Development Load Rate summary is less than the Pre-Development, however the supporting documentation contained in this report does not appear to support the summary information. Wetlands: A total of 439.2 acres of SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands are on site. Approximately 62 acres of wetland preserve are incorporated into the master plan. Details on proposed hydroperiods, seasonal water elevations, and methods for preservation have been developed in coordination with SFWMD during the ERP permitting process. Wetland mitigation for the 377.2 acres of on-site degraded wetlands to be filled will be achieved largely or entirely per the ERP process by enhancing portions of the large contiguous native vegetation communities that occur outside of the western boundary of the project. Preservation Requirements: Pursuant to the Growth Management Plan Future Land Use Element, preservation of listed species habitat and other native areas in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area is addressed by the creation of the required Stewardship Sending Areas. As a result of the DRI review process and other agency requirements, preservation and enhancement of 62 acres of native wetland vegetation are currently incorporated into the master plan (see Wetland Preserve designations on Map H). These areas are severely degraded by historic clear-cutting and pasture management, and now exist as exotic monocultures (Brazilian pepper).A remnant cypress dome occurs in one preserve, while small areas of hydric pine flatwood and willow marsh occur in the other preserve. These areas will be EAC Meeting Page 6 of 10 restored as freshwater marshes that will be integrated into the surface water management lake system. These restored marshes will provide high-quality habitat for wading birds and other wetland-dependent species, and enhance post- development water quality. In addition to on-site preserves, wetland impact mitigation will be achieved largely or entirely (per the ERP mitigation process)by enhancing portions of the large contiguous native vegetation communities that occur outside of the western boundary of the Town. These large systems, comprising the eastern border of the Camp Keais Strand, are degraded due to invasive exotic species and pioneer plant species that exploit the "edge effect" adjacent to agricultural fields. The prioritization, extent, and nature of wetland enhancements within these larger offsite systems will be determined in consultation with SFWMD and FWC. Based upon the estimated jurisdictional wetland acreage and the master plan, a total of approximately 377 acres of wetland will be either filled for development or excavated for surface water management lakes. More than half of the impact acreage occurs within wet pastures dominated by torpedo grass, and wetlands containing Brazilian pepper monocultures. Listed Species: A listed plant and animal species survey was conducted by WilsonMiller on this site, using field methodologies that were consistent with those prescribed by the 1988 FGFWFC publication Wildlife Methodology Guidelines for Section 18.D of the Application for Development Approval (FGFWFC, 1988). The surveys also employed the "Standardized State-Listed Animal Survey Procedures for SFWMD ERP Projects," a more recent standardized survey methodology for southwest Florida (J. Beever III, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission- FWC, 2002). Listed plant and wildlife species were considered to be those species documented within the FWC publication Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Species of Special Concern: Official Lists (FWC, 1997; 2004). At least 562 person hours were spent on site during this listed species survey. The following listed plant and animal species were found on site: Tillandsia balbisiana Reflexed wild pine; Tillandsia pruinosa Fuzzy-wuzzy; Tillandsia fasciculata Common wild pine; Acrostichum spp. Leather fern; Tillandsia utriculata Giant wild pine; Grus canadensis pratensis Florida sandhill crane; Mysteria americana Wood stork;Aramus guarauna Limpkin;Polyborus plancus audubonii Audubon's crested caracara; Egretta tricolor Tricolor heron; Egretta caerulea Little blue heron; Egretta thula Snowy egret; Eudocimus albus White ibis; Ajaia ajaja Roseate spoonbill;Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing owl. Nesting activity on site involved the caracaras, which nested and bred successfully in the very northeast corner of the site. The following listed species could potentially be found on site: Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker; Falco sparverius paulus Southeastern American kestrel; Aphelocoma coerulescens Florida scrub jay; Haliaeetus EAC Meeting Page 7 of 10 leucocephalus Bald eagle; Felis concolor coryi Florida panther; Sciurus niger avicennia Big Cypress fox squirrel; Ursus americanus floridanus Florida black bear; Gopherus polyphemus Gopher tortoise; Drymarchon couperi Eastern indigo snake. Based on comments from the Florida Fish and wildlife Conservation Commision this project is located in suitable habitat for the Florida panther and Florida black bear. The project as designed will directly impact habitat used by the panther and bear and is likely to adversaffect the remaining fragmented habitat used by the panther and bear. To address these impacts , habitat protection for listed plants and wildlife species and additional off-site wetland mitigation will occur on approximately 16,999 acres of land as part of the RLSA Stewardship Sending Areas. According to the FLUE, for projects within the RLSA, the primary means of directing development away from wetlands and critical habitat is the prohibition of locating SRAs in FSAs,HSAs, and WRAs. VII. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of Development of Regional Impact No. DRI- 2004-AR- 6293 with the following stipulations: Stormwater Management: 1. None Environmental: 1. Comply with all stipulations contained in the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's Official Recommendations for the Town of Ave Maria DRI. This document states that"Any DRI Development Order issued by the Collier County shall contain the following provisions: a. Habitat protection for listed plants and wildlife species and additional off site wetland mitigation will occur on approximately 17,000 acres of land, as part of the Rural Lands Stewardship (RLSA) development entitlement process. The development order shall indicate the specific entity(s) that will hold the Stewardship easements to the off site 17,000 acres of Stewardship Sending areas, and set a date certain for the execution and filing of the Stewardship easement with Collier County records. b. The development order shall include provisions that the crested caracara management plan be submitted for review, comments and approval by the FWC and USFWS prior to commencement ,.� of project construction beyond that approved in the Preliminary Development Agreement. c. The development order shall include that pre-construction surveys for burrowing owl shall be conducted in accordance EAC Meeting Page 8 of 10 measures, and, if needed, mitigation, prior to project approval and construction. d. The development order shall include provisions that an indigo snake protection plan, if required by USFWS, be developed reviewed and approved by USFWS prior to commencement of construction. e. Preserve and restore 62 acres of wetlands as freshwater marshes that will be integrated into the surface water management system in two locations shown on the Master Development Plan. f. Mitigation (wetland/habitat enhancement) for impacts to on- site wetlands where listed species plants are found is planned to occur within the large systems just outside (west) of the property, and will maintain suitable environments for these plants to thrive. g. The set asides for panther will be established somewhere in the SSAs, and the exact locations, habitat type(s), and extent of the set asides will be determined via Section 7 consultation with USFWS, and the concurrence of FWC. h. All commitments made by the applicant within the ADA, and r-� subsequent sufficiency round information, related to Question 12 (Vegetation and Wildlife) and Question 13 (Wetlands), and not in conflict with the above recommendations, shall be incorporated in the Collier County Development Order as conditions for approval." ,- -= r . if -W1�PYIl�1Clk� ` cc ilf -1.,., Lu -"� �` � -i yl /i\ T 1�'i' • i1 Iiiii,_,, , __ _ „, w , , -ILE' LiDAR - ...I .F. <,- VALUE> 20.1-20.5 20.1 19.6-20 /- NB 19.1-19.5 d 18.6-19 18.1-185 17.6-18 17.1-17.5 16.6-17 -10.0-16.5 EAC Meeting Page 9 of 10 PREPARED BY: STAN CHRZANOW' , P.E. DATE ENGINEERING REVIEW MANAGER ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT S MASON DATE OR ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT 4-18-5 RAY cl L(1 S, .I.C.P. — DATE MER DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW EAC Meeting Page 10 of 10 REVIEWED BY: et_ /37,o2- (/-/Y-- BARBARA S. BURGESON DATE PRINCIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT 04'_x$-c5 • `IAM D. LO'iNZ, J ., P.E., DIRECTOR, DATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT VASA'SOSAN MURRAY,AICP, DIREC • ' , DATE DEPARTMENT OF ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVED BY: J 6 S: H K. SCHMITT A E 0 MUNITY DEVELOPMENT &ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES r,MINISTRATOR 5358-04 HALDEMAN CREEK SEDIMENT SAMPLES Jul-04 SAMPLE# TIME DESCRIPTION CCHC 101 9:34 FRESHWATER OUTFLOW, DARK SEDIMENT, ANOXIC CCHC 103 9:54 FINE GRAIN, DETRITUS, ANOXIC CCHC 104 10:07 ORGANIC, DETRITUS,ANOXIC CCHC 105 10:27 BRANCHES ON BOTTOM, ORGANIC, TWIGS, ANOXIC CCHC 102 10:41 FINE SAND, SMALL DETRITUS, SMALL SHELL CONTENT CCHC 131 10:55 FINE SAND, LOWER ORGANICS THAN OTHER CANALS, MORE CONSOLIDATED CCHC 132 11:05 MUDDY, LOT OF DETRITUS, STEMS, LEAVES,ANOXIC CCHC 107 11:16 FINE GRAIN, GOOEY, NOT MUCH DETRITUS CCHC 133 11:26 FINE GRAIN, NOT MUCH SAND CCHC 106 11:47 FINE GRAIN, NOT MUCH SAND, SMALL DETRITUS CCHC 108 11:58 FINE GRAIN, VERY ANOXIC, DETRITUS CCHC 134 12:07 BROKEN ROCK, NOT AS ANOXIC, NO DETRITUS CCHC 109 12:17 MORE DETRITUS, FINE GRAIN, NOT AS ANOXIC CCHC 135 12:26 MORE DETRITUS, FINE GRAIN, NOT AS ANOXIC CCHC 110 12:37 MORE DETRITUS, FINE GRAIN, NOT AS ANOXIC CCHC 136 12:46 LESS DETRITUS, SAME CONSISTENCY CCHC 111 12:54 SAME CONSISTENCY, MORE DETRITUS CCHC 139 13:12 A LOT OF DETRITUS, VERY ANOXIC, GOOEY CCHC 140 13:25 NOT AS MUCH DETRITUS, ANOXIA NOT AS BAD, STILL GOOEY CCHC 141 14:08 SANDY, FINE, NOT AS MUCH DETRITUS CCHC 115 14:22 FINE GRAIN, LITTLE DETRITUS, NOT AS ANOXIC CCHC 137 14:30 FINE GRAIN, NOT AS MUCH DETRITUS, NOT AS ANOXIC CCHC 138 14:41 FINE GRAIN, MORE DETRITUS, NOT AS ANOXIC CCHC 130 14:51 FINE GRAIN, MORE DETRITUS, NOT AS ANOXIC CCHC 114 15:01 MORE SAND, MORE DETRITUS CCHC 129 15:10 MORE SAND, NOT AS MUCH DETRITUS CCHC 113 15:20 MORE SAND, NOT AS MUCH DETRITUS, DARKER COLOR CCHC 112 15:29 LITTLE MORE SAND CCHC 142 15:44 SMALL SHELL, SAND, DETRITUS, LITTLE ANOXIA CCHC 143 16:01 LESS SAND, VERY GOOEY, LITTLE DETRITUS, LITTLE ANOXIA CCHC 116 16:11 LESS SAND, VERY GOOEY, LITTLE DETRITUS, LITTLE ANOXIA CCHC 144 16:19 VERY ANOXIC LITTLE DETRITUS, GOOEY, BRANCHES ON BOTTOM CCHC 117 16:31 NOT AS ANOXIC, GOOEY, SAMLL AMOUNT OF DETRITUS CCHC 118 16:40 NOT AS ANOXIC, GOOEY, SAMLL AMOUNT OF DETRITUS CCHC 119 16:48 BROKEN ROCK, DETRITUS, LOCAL SAYS ROCK LEDGE IN AREA? CCHC 120 16:58 HIGH SAND, LOW DETRITUS, TINY SHELL CCHC 123 17:13 LOTS OF SAND, BROKEN SHELL, MILD ANOXIA CCHC 126 17:29 FINE, NO SHELL OR ROCK, NOT MUCH ANOXIA 3 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J J 000 , 00D J J J 0 0 0 0 J J J 0 00000000000000000 = 0000 0 a 8 - m m m m m m m m m •m m m •m m m m m m m r m m m m m m m m m m (a m m m m m m m m m m m m rNo8N a 0 o Yp p p - puUN J 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J J O _ Y N n n o a 1 o o N Y e r o i F.o n p p p p n m 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 n n 6 6 6 6 6 in 6 .n in 66 66 6 6 0 6 6 6 a ua 6 U n • Toa 00000000 J 0 0000 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 x N o 5Q�c. c§ N Y 1 ! p o p in a F o M Fi Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y `,7 Y Y Y Y Y Y YY Y Y Y Y m Y Y Y Y Y `.7:YY Y o Y U U n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 0000000 0 0000 000000000000000000000000 § O UN m N g N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U S N N m o o o O a N o m 0 0 p o O n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 O '- 8 Y N m g o g N 1a o o p o Y o n o $ o m m m m m m rn m m m m m m m m m m m m n of M m m m m m n n n M n m m m m ,Ti ,Ti ,Ti ,Ti m m m m U i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 a UN o o p N o m e ^ e p o •o O n o 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 00 , 00000000000000 00000000000000000000000 O xNN m o o N o g N a o op n e e p Y Y Y Yet Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y YY Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y m Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y U r ON o (a000000 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000000000000 = 0 J J J 0 J J J J J J J J d = N Y N N ,'$; `! '-`3, R, I o O p o m - vi Ei o m n ..1?: •..,,,, m U O n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 O § oY p o NroN m r n r r n n n n n n n n n n n n n r r r n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n nUnO O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00000000000000000000000000000000 1 U r o$ N g 0 g N NN NN N N e N N N N N N N N N N N N N to N N N N NN N N N N Y N N N6 N N N N N N cd N VY , o e o Y N Y o n o No a o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 = 0000000000000 0 000000 = 0 000000000000 21 ,5i N m o o e O N 0 n o N e o Y o d 0000 = 000 0 0 D00000DD .,..) i O N <1o O N Y O o o Y N o m O O p O m pp N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N U ^ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0000000000000 0000000000000000000000000000000 N N N 4 = g `0 n g § g o : N o a pni' ! o N a o n : 'A N N N N • N N N N N N N N N N N N N ',p N N N N N N N N N N u> N N N N N N N N N N N N U ry U n o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0000000 00000000000000000000000000 U N ch a N 0 g N N N N N N N p N N N N N N N N N N N N N ,n N N S n N m O O O O Y � N o N O N N N N N N N N N N Y N N N N N N N N N td (d td U N N O O n o QJ J J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 00000J000000000 = 000 N Q 2 N ;7' ,. m o o e o o Y O p Y e o n . N O N . Un o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 000000 , 0 JJ > > > 00J0J0000000000000J000 00 0 0 0 0 0 a � § CL n p NN o Y �p N o N N N, o �p N p o - e e m m 2 2 a 2 ro 2 ro 2 (a 2 2 m m ro 2 0 `o ro m m m m m :u (a 2 m m m ro 2 r m m 2 2 e O n a O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 N g A .2N c, n & ry N o cd o cd p cd 0 9999999990000000099 n 0 900000090 N 00 S N N p v °� O O C p 0 O Y e O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Y N N N N N N N N N N U n o O . . 000000J J 000000 J J J J J J 000000 = 00000000000000000000000D • n e A cA c g g o g R O O 0 e n p ! p 0 m e e ! C : a 0.„. . r . . Y . . . . . Un o Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000000000000000000000000 S N n N m 0 Y _ 0 O N 0 ! n e O O e N U � g 22222222222222222222222 YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY J R R R R R R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E _ _ R _ _ 2. m _ _ g R m = m a a' R T os'a' R T s z a a a a T a a z E R R. i rn o. a rn rn o. o• � rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m m rn rn rn rn m rn rn o+ rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn m rn rn a 2 rt, Q. L ° ▪ a `' o ` 5 - °0 2g. � w HHt !; I • ct n u c m - Qo15 C oco - g ? P o2o ? -2QQ y t > ? oQoE 1 O = t ` ` _ aguQEtEE ImtTu of6 o u - $ N3 oQb Q I. o ca7 ua - E E E a c ET -' E _ > E > - d - _ " E E9o v ` '§ .-a- LAr or ouY ' . 3 ? - o -n _ t x $ N - a r u 2 tL a .0 t -uo - o oo uo - J, uo uo2 r 08 uD o D g _ `7N t o 0 2 - X-d N r - uuua r 2 2m twf < ( OCg0 = m ¢ amziuuvmigz ° J8P > u maoroCAuO c icU2ONir° PImuaR562 .9 ,2 ,'2 ,7 -5 ,7 02-0 ; E O pp 000 0 AAAA A a F Fi ry E F ry m ry O D = D 000 O 00 DD0 D O D > 0 0 0 D r e ro n "4' r n n S N n o n ry n O 00 = 00 o f o .e r Y n r w n a r I n F e ! ! r O 000 D00 C. m e e n m o E. ' F ry m o o r w YYY YfY ,22A222An � Nm loo M = = = 0 0 N r r O ry Y b Y Y I F Y F n N Y 2 2 tLO g 2 n n 7 f F a W r ' r ry 0 tp O 4 D OD Opp 22222222222,', 22222222222 „ e c e • - - n d 71122 d _ E N m O r m `$ 'd 3 U • Z in ciOv ¢ ¢ LL `a < u a m U m m m m 4 O m M O O f u w 03 ,5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 333333833333333 D D D D D D D D D D D D D 7 D D D D D D D D D D a U 2 N m N o 0N n N o M ! n ' S °. 'o r_ csi l N O O O O O 4 N a a a O O O 4 Q a a a < O .2 > a a a a a a ; m e a a a a a a S N N- 0 rn O N- g _ _ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 333333333333333333333333333333333333333 d v• 2 $ N A ,c,?,, .2 2 N o Q N o o N o p m 0 = ' N a N o o 0 o v Q a . aaOQ a a v o v v e 0 o v o o a o e v a v N v a v o Qa SON g 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 7 DDDDDD m D O D D 7 D D D D D D D 7 D 7 7 D D D O D 7 D 7 7 7 7 D O D D D d N g ' c o `±)- N V O O O -i'. o o Oo .. N O O F. N NO O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O N O O 0 0 0 = 1� N m ^ fV N 0 < N O O O C b 'y 0 V O '„ O ' 0 0 O o m U N '; N O N- g 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 333333933333333333333333333333333333333 d o g _ 4 0 ONN 0 a V a O o o C N d ry o ' dO o 0 O o a N m N m n cW -H . a ^ .- .- - - - - - - m U N U - g dyy . = O O N h C N A N O O O N Z,' '': :: 0 `, c0 N cO c0 c0 ED E E. E. c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 E. E. c0 E. co E E. c0 E c0 c0 c0 <0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 m co U N A N 0 0 ' N N O N U r'-'. g 33333 D D D D D 7 D m D DDD DD JD DDDDDDD DDDDD OD DDD DDDDD JD ...- - :L. v .''- 0- U oN O S R N N % N• ' '� ry O °i c N N CV m v' <• rt9i in 6 6 to 6 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 u, 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 in vi 6 6 N 6 6 6 UNn g o v o N U 3 3 3 7 3 3 7 3 U 333333333333333333333333333333333333333 0 yyNy _ N m N N a a N m NN O N o O • 0o 0 0 N o O o N N m m m m CO m m m CO m m •- m m CO m m m CO m m m m m CO m CR a O O O 4 4 ,- a a a a a a a a a a O a aa a a a a a a a a a co a a a a a a O On OOp 8 3 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 333333333333333333333333333333333333333 d I N • N- O O o N N o O N M O O m O m O O N N N• d o0 N n m m m m m m m m c+> m 0 m m m m m m m U n g 3 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 3 333333033333333333333333333333333333333 a g 0 21 4 0 0 0' N N O ao N N O N m 0 m °0 d O N- O N 0O N m ; M O N +- 0Nm 00000 . . 0 . 0000 COm m m m " Oi m m m m m m m m m m m 0 <6 mm m m m m m m S N A U N- g 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 D 3333333333333333333333333 .-9333333333D DD d ✓ g 1 ,1 : 40, .,'; d N 4 o o m a N N o $ N v, v v, a o v m o v o v N O . . . 0 0 0 0 0 S N N o N N O O N O O O N N r < O N O O• N O N O N O N O U N a A S O 33333333 7 D D 7 U 7 D D m D 7 D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 7 D D D D D D D D D D D U 7 D 7 ''`' g e:'; = N N m N N O V 8 N O O cO0 N 2 N O N O d 0 O m '.i,'. O N ' O O O O O O rO N 0 0 0 0 0 0 m N U r g U D D D D D D D 7 = 33333333333333333333333333333333333 a' m2• $ o o m o E o $ a $ m c'`.1 N F', a o 0 o a Q a a a a a a a a a a a . a a a a a a a a a a N a a a a a a a S N N m •o• N N O a N O m N O C ' O N 0 0 m •• 0 d O u"4 N m U U r o O 33333333 3 U 3 D D U D U U D m 7 D U 7 D U D 7 D 7 7 D D D U D D D D D 7 D D D D D D D D D D D g yy •U N N Vr N m N O ON N 0 0 G ON N N m h O y < 2 Nvo 0 N O N N N N N N OO N N N . N NN o U N- g 3 7 3 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 333333333333333333333333333333333333333 d -/- 7a o ▪ N 4 g g p pN 1 pN M 46• o N e Oo . o N / o '' M N d o 0 O N a a a a a a N- a a a a a a a a a a a a a L. a a a a a a a a a a 9 a a a a a a a S � m m ‘Ni U ^ g O 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U 3 333333833333333333333333333333333333333 Fgp S N a N m N O ON O N oO g O O N r m O C a a a a a O 2 a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 a a a a a O NO . . . . . . N UUN-N r To 3 3 7 3 7 3 7 3 3 333333333333333333333333333333333333333 a ,P, O p d N O ^ y - N N O M O 0 0 N o A H 0 N N N N N N N I� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0, 0, O m o m m rn m u. N N N N N N N S ',3_, N m N N o o N m N N O m N d Y) pc r N N N N N N N N N N O N- g U _ T4' 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U 3 3 3 3 3 3 m 7 3 3 7 3 7 U U 7 3 U U 3 3 3 D D D D D D D 3 3 3 3 3 U 7 3 3 D d po m m e o N o e _ N N,`', 'o" N o a h ,� o 0 0 < "' r-, ‘,2 !. m o e m m m m m m m N m m m m m m m m m m m m m N m m m m m m m m m of ui m m m m m m m U N A N UN- g m 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 U D33333 '833333333333333333333333333333333 d g o 2 N N N N O d N N O V O O b N O 5O N o N O O A O N m m U ^ gU O To a ' US 4 a 2 0 o oO N ,! N O ' O a o A a h o A OCI yy o 7 o p N m NNN N N NN NN N N N N N N N N N N 6 N N N N N N N N a N N N N N N N Un g - t t t 22222222222222222222222 222222222222222222222222222222222222222 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 2• 2 E• E E E E E E E E E E E E E E• E• E E• E E m m m m m m m m -eh N N Pt t m tm ndu v c v v °' c 5 m IL!' E c o y o « o 'r,i 2 - o 'Si 0 c N E O On v v Q - v too c o 't t vo ` o L v oE t o pm ? co tv . -5 ' o o y T-. v Q co r0 0cvcc • Za E D 5 - ? m ' 000 € L5o « ou £ -E o -E ^ mEco0 o a E p t5 t _ 5 ov o c t aaU - E ? 2` E E a EEj 5E - m o E c m ° mw o - r o --5:, D e = _ sov - vrF 2 E J 0oc o - m _ E o E _f-.1 .2 o -0 n F ' osmc ° - ° = P 0 L-;‘ ,2 .-2. o ."' m o c0 g '.1 HP O o0 ^ t0 Eo N zc5 cvv Q• Q � '� U U N fNU � QQi. 0 U — U U U 0 N O dO tNU Otij 0 O U > U ' _ - N N2No UO ^ aLE 4 U U 4- I n U NU ^ - Um — ti n- al vN « F- O .- W a ^ N O ^ ^ 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ° v v o v v N N N N N N N N N N N a .n N a a n m m N m N a o of m n a m O� m r O m m d m 4 4 4 3 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 3 7 V O O N N N N m N N N N N N N h N m N N N N N N N N h d 0 • M M N om9 N N N N N < m r 0 3 7 7 7 3 3 3 7 3 333333 m m N m ry � � <p tp tp N �O m m 0 M m m m m F M N m N ' 2 ry ' O M M m 3 7 3 7 3 7 3 7 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 y LTim m7-` m b N O m m m m m m m m � '" a"O � M m � h �n � r r r 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 m m t ' N h O V O V O m m m m m m m m m � �- � r � M � 0 o r V N mm a � c D DDDD DDDD DDD DD oo F. m ` ' N o rm, rn m m m m m m 44444444244 ry � � m m � r � r D DDDD DDDD DDD DD 0o d o o o m N 22 ',i22 N N ry N N N m N N N N � � � � O N m i0 N 7F:94 3 3 3 7 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 r m o o v v v o n a n a n 2 n M o m N a m es a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :2 a n 4 n n oai m N 22 Si ry ry ro a m ry = 3333 3 3 3 3 7 3 = 3 3 7 yy 3 3 3 N N V b N d O 71 V 71 2 O m ` D 33,33 33333333333 333333,3333D N N N N N N N N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N O • V V VO 0 0 0 0 n e � , ry N n n a uO1i uryi M aF F � 3 > > > > > c vr � .h � S !! .- � � L. � L. ao M .' a .o m i n O o m N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 3 22222 N ' N ry a N `" N o F. 4 F o � E N FF O 3 7 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 3 m m m m m N N N N N N N N M O C, m0 b M r N Oi O ry N y trp m 3 7 3 3 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 tDD o Yf amp V N N N N N n n n n O1 n n n r n Yr1 f.g N 2 2 d yy O M a N ry N O r ' rf 22222 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 0 a c 31133333131131 = =. 1113. 33 a t) € 10 a 22 ° m m u c 22 2 22 s � v _ °1 t r a c v • m ,h o o O v m m m 'c d N = D O O O " k2-2 T y 0 0 _ _ _ C D1 Q O O U m m t a N c w � d 6 t n N a Q m N m m m in 1° oo 0 N x a N m m m 5 T) m H o H 5 n s o m a 0 i m z m a a LL a a LL a 2 m m m m a o m y EAC Meeting May 4 , 2005 Haldeman Creek - Sediment Sample Sites Map DRI-PL20040006293 This map is too large to scan but, can be found at: Board' s Minutes and Records Dept., 4th Floor, Building F 3299 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida