The URL can be used to link to this page

Backup Documents 02/28/2017 Item # 8A February 28, 2017 'A-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA . COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To:Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: x Normal legal Advertisement Other: ,,,,..„ A (Display Adv., Location,etc.) Originating Dept/Div: GMD/Zoning, Person:Fred Reischl Principal Planner Date:February 08,2017 Petition No.(If none,give a brief description): PL20160001181 Petitioner: (Name&Address):Jason Jenks 7600 Alico rd 12-2 Fort Myers,FL 33912 Name&Address of any person(s)to be notified by the Clerk's office: (if more space is needed,attach separate sheet) Hearing before BCC X BZA Other Requested Hearing date:Tuesday, February 28,2017, (Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s)to be used:(Complete only if important): xxx Naples Daily News Account#068779 Other Legally Required Purchase Order No.4500172052 Proposed text:(include legal description&common locations&size: Legal Section X Non-Legal Section Companion petition(s),if any&proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? x Yes No. If yes,what account should be charged for advertising costs: 131-138326-649100-00000 Reviewed By Date Z-- 1-0 -Division Administrator or Designee List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA:Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: if legal documents Is Involved,be sure that any necessary legal review,or request for same,is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: County Manager agenda file:to Requesting Division Original B. Other hearings:initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy file. FOR CLERK'S OFFIC � Date Received gz l �_ Date of Public Hearing �� r1 I Date Advertised MI I I 1 0 8 A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, February 28, 2017, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners(BCC)will consider the enactment of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.. The title of the proposed Resolution is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4.02.03.A, TABLE 4 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK LINE FROM 20 FEET TO 6.55 FEET FOR A SWIMMING POOL, SPA, POOL DECK AND STAIRS ON A WATERFRONT LOT WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY (RSF-3) ZONING DISTRICT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 342 TRADE WINDS AVENUE, IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [VA- PL20160001181] A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PENNY TAYLOR, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Patricia Morgan Deputy Clerk(SEAL) 1, 8A Martha S. Vergara From: Reischl, Fred Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 4:16 PM To: Martha S.Vergara Cc: Bellows, Ray; Bosi, Michael; KulakPatricia; Patricia L. Morgan; Neet,Virginia; PageErin Subject: Ad Request Trade Winds VA Attachments: 20170208051252.pdf;Ad Request BCC.docx; Resolution initialed by SAS -012617.pdf Hi Martha- This is the ad that Patty talked to you about.Thanks so much for your help! -Fred A€ K'oiocli•1,AICP Principal Planner 239-252-4211 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 www.colliergov.net OFA.• Cr°e,ty Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. • 1 8A Acct. #068779 February 8, 2017 Attn: Legals Naples News Media 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, Florida 34110 Re: VA-PL20160001181, Trade Winds VA Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Friday, February 10, 2017 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in Duplicate, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500172052 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 8 A NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, February 28, 2017, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the enactment of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Resolution is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4.02.03.A, TABLE 4 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK LINE FROM 20 FEET TO 6.55 FEET FOR A SWIMMING POOL, SPA, POOL DECK AND STAIRS ON A WATERFRONT LOT WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY (RSF-3) ZONING DISTRICT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 342 TRADE WINDS AVENUE, IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [VA- PL20160001181] A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PENNY TAYLOR, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 8A County-of olli r CLERK OF THE CIICU COURT COLLIER COUNTY C( JRTHO SE Dwight E. Brock-Clerl f Circuit Court 3315 TAMIAMI TRL E STE 102 P.O.BOX 413044 NAPLES,FL 34112-5324 i NAPLES,FL 34101-3044 �5 Clerk of Courts • Comptroller • Auditor • Crus odian of County Funds February 8, 2017 Attn: Jason Jenks 7600 Alico Road 12-2 Fort Myers, FL 33912 RE: VA-PL20160001181, Trade Winds VA Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 28, 2017 as indicated on the enclosed notice. A legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Friday, February 10, 2017. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK /-\U Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 252-2646 Fax- (239) 252-2755 Website- www.CollierClerk.com Email-CollierClerk@collierclerk.com 8A Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S.Vergara Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 9:05 AM To: Legals NDN (Iegals@naplesnews.com) Subject: VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Attachments: VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA (2-28-17).doc;VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds (2-28-17).doc Importance: High Hello, Please advertise the following attached ad Friday, February 10, 2017. Please forward an ok when received, if you have any questions feel free to call me. Thanks, Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Dept. Clerk of the Circuit Court & Value Adjustment Board Office: (239) 252-7240 Fax: (239) 252-8408 E-mail: martha.vergara@collierclerk.com • 1 8 A Martha S. Vergara From: Gori,Ivonne <Ivonne.Gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 9:45 AM To: Martha S.Vergara Subject: RE:VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Confirmed receipt From: Martha S.Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent:Thursday, February 09, 2017 9:05 AM To: NDN-Legals<legals@naplesnews.com> Subject:VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Importance: High Hello, Please advertise the following attached ad Friday, February 10, 2017. Please forward an ok when received, if you have any questions feel free to call me. Thanks, Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Dept. Clerk of the Circuit Court & Value Adjustment Board Office: (239) 252-7240 Fax: (239) 252-8408 E-mail: martha.vergara@collierclerk.com Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent.If you are not the intended recipient,you must not copy,distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. Unless expressly stated,opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County. If you have received this communication in error,please notify the Clerk's Office by emailing helpdesk@collierclerk.com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents.The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain. Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 8A Martha S. Vergara From: ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:03 AM To: Martha S. Vergara Cc: Ivonne Gori Subject: Ad: 1481737, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF I Attachments: BCCZONINGD-27-1481737-1.pdf Attached is the document you requested. Please review and let us know if you have any questions. Thank you. Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist Naples Daily News/USA Today Network 0: 239.213.6061 F: 239.263.4307 E:ivonne.gori@NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 1 8A ? apLc !i B1aiL two Sales Rep:Ivonne Gori(N9103) Phone:(239)262-3161 Email:ivonne.gori@,naplesnews.com —111111111111111111,-- Date:02/09/17 This is a proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates indicated below. Account Number:505868(N068779) Please confirm placement prior to deadline by contacting your account Company Name:BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT rep at(239)262-3161. Ad Id:1481737 P.O.No.: Total Cost:$387.15 Contact Name: Email:martha.vergaragcollierclerkcom Tag Line:NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF I Address:3299 TAMIAMI TRL E#700,NAPLES,FL,34112 Start Date:02/10/17 Stop Date:02/10/17 Phone:(239)774-8049 Fax:(239)774-6179 Number of Times:1 Class:16250-Public Notices Publications:ND-Naples Daily News,ND-Internet-naplesnews.com I agree this ad is accurate and as ordered. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday,February 28,2017,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor, Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners(BCC)will consider the enactment of a County Resolution.The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed Resolution is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,FOR A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4.02.03.A,TABLE 4 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK LINE FROM 20 FEET TO 6.55 FEET FOR A SWIMMING POOL,SPA,POOL DECK AND STAIRS ON A WATERFRONT LOT WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY(RSF-3)ZONING DISTRICT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 342 TRADE WINDS AVENUE,IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 25 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA.(VA-PL201600011811 A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection.All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE:All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item.The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman,a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included In the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing.All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a personwith a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,youare entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112- 5356,(239)252.8380,at least two days priorto the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA PENNY TAYLOR,CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK By: Martha Vergara,Deputy Clerk (SEAL) February 10,2017 No.1481737 Thank you for your business. Our commitment to a quality product includes the advertising in our publications. As such,Gannett reserves the right to cat- egorize,edit and refuse certain classified ads.Your satisfaction is important. If you notice errors in your ad,please notify the classified department immedi- • ately so that we can make corrections before the second print date. The number to call is 239-263-4700. Allowance may not be made for errors reported past the second print date.The Naples Daily News may not issue refunds for classified advertising purchased in a package rate;ads purchased on the open rate may be pro-rated for the remaining full days for which the ad did not run. 8A Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S. Vergara Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:07 AM To: NeetVirginia (VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net); Reischl, Fred;Ashton, Heidi; Stone, Scott Subject: VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Ad Proof Attachments: BCCZONINGD-27-1481737-1.pdf Importance: High Morning All, Attached is the ad proof from NDN for your review. Please let me know of any changes. Thanks, Martha 1 8A Martha S. Vergara From: Stone, Scott Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:08 AM To: Martha S.Vergara; Crotteau, Kathynell Cc: Ashton, Heidi Subject: FW: VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Ad Proof Attachments: BCCZONINGD-27-1481737-1.pdf Importance: High Hi Martha, Can you please copy Kathy on future ad proofs for BCC ads?Thanks! Scott A.Stone Assistant County Attorney Collier County Attorney's Office (239) 252-5740 From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:07 AM To: NeetVirginia; ReischlFred; AshtonHeidi; StoneScott Subject: VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Ad Proof Importance: High Morning All, Attached is the ad proof from NDN for your review. Please let me know of any changes. Thanks, Martha Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 8 A Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S.Vergara Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:11 AM To: Stone, Scott Subject: RE:VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Ad Proof Of course! From:Stone, Scott Sent:Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:08 AM To: Martha S.Vergara <Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com>; Crotteau, Kathynell<KathynellCrotteau@colliergov.net> Cc:Ashton, Heidi<HeidiAshton@colliergov.net> Subject: FW:VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Ad Proof Importance: High Hi Martha, Can you please copy Kathy on future ad proofs for BCC ads?Thanks! Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney Collier County Attorney's Office (239) 252-5740 From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.VergaraCa collierclerk.com] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:07 AM To: NeetVirginia; ReischlFred; AshtonHeidi; StoneScott Subject: VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Ad Proof Importance: High Morning All, Attached is the ad proof from NDN for your review. Please let me know of any changes. Thanks, Martha Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 8A Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S. Vergara Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:12 AM To: Crotteau, Kathynell Subject: FW:VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Ad Proof Attachments: BCCZONINGD-27-1481737-1.pdf Importance: High Hi Kathy, Scott Stone asked me to copy you as well for BCC Ads. Thanks, Martha From: Martha S.Vergara Sent:Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:07 AM To: NeetVirginia (VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net)<VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; Reischl, Fred <FredReischl@colliergov.net>;Ashton, Heidi<HeidiAshton@colliergov.net>; Stone, Scott<ScottStone@colliergov.net> Subject:VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Ad Proof Importance: High Morning All, Attached is the ad proof from NDN for your review. Please let me know of any changes. Thanks, Martha 1 8A Martha S. Vergara From: Stone, Scott Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:20 AM To: Martha S.Vergara; Neet, Virginia Cc: Crotteau, Kathynell Subject: RE:VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Ad Proof Looks good. Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney Collier County Attorney's Office (239) 252-5740 From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:07 AM To: NeetVirginia; ReischlFred; AshtonHeidi; StoneScott Subject: VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Ad Proof Importance: High Morning All, Attached is the ad proof from NDN for your review. Please let me know of any changes. Thanks, Martha Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 8A Martha S. Vergara From: Reischl, Fred Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:27 AM To: Martha S.Vergara; Neet, Virginia;Ashton, Heidi; Stone, Scott Cc: KulakPatricia Subject: RE:VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Ad Proof Looks good for Planning...thanks again, Martha! #Z.cel AICP Principal Planner 239-252-4211 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 www.colliergov.net Cmc►' er C.oursty From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 10:07 AM To: NeetVirginia; ReischlFred; AshtonHeidi; StoneScott Subject: VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds VA Ad Proof Importance: High Morning All, Attached is the ad proof from NDN for your review. Please let me know of any changes. Thanks, Martha Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 8A Martha S. Vergara From: Gori,Ivonne <Ivonne.Gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:32 AM To: Martha S.Vergara Subject: RE: 1481737, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF I Thank you, released Original Message From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:22 AM To: Gori, Ivonne <Ivonne.Gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: RE: 1481737, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF I Morning Ivonne, The legal department has reviewed and approved this ad proof. Please proceed with publishing as requested. Thanks, Martha Original Message From: ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:03 AM To: Martha S. Vergara <Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com> Cc: Ivonne Gori <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: Ad: 1481737, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF I Attached is the document you requested. Please review and let us know if you have any questions. Thank you. Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist Naples Daily News/USA Today Network 0: 239.213.6061 F: 239.263.4307 E:ivonne.gori@NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com 1 VA—Tt—• 2-0 e 3 teak 8 i4 28D Friday,February 10,2017 Naples Daily News Public Notices Public Notices NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, February 28, 2017, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor, Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the enactment of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence at 9:00_A.M.The title of the proposed Resolution is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,FOR A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4.02.03.A, TABLE 4 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK LINE FROM 20 FEET TO 6.55 FEET FOR A SWIMMING POOL,SPA,POOL DECK AND STAIRS ON A WATERFRONT LOT WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY (RSF-3) ZONING DISTRICT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 342 TRADE WINDS AVENUE, IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA.(VA-PL20160001181] A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112- 5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA PENNY TAYLOR,CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK By: Martha Vergara,Deputy Clerk (SEAL) February 10,2017 No.1481737 8 A ?'apLrø Battu ?'rwi NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT 1481737 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA Pub Dates February 10,2017 �c (Sign ure of affiant) liodiaNdibaboommisudiuirmiudihromandhirir Sworn to and subscribed before me 4 ,OM:„,,, IVONNE GORI This February 6,2017 1 • , Notary Public-State of Florida 1 yl• •= Commission *FF 900870 11° My Comm.Expires Jul 16.2019 A'n r. • �� Bonded through National Notary Assn (Signatur of affiant) ' 28D Friday,February 10,2017 Naples Daily News 8 A N' ce tiNut',Ol Sale Putt],Nnt'ices PISH'Nukkes CHEVROLET CORVETTE-2001 VS. NOTICE OF INTENT TO All of Lot 52 and thatart of NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING Convertible.Pristine Torch REGISTER FICTITIOUS NAME. Lot 51,of VILLA VISTANA AT NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION Red over Black convertible. THE UNKNOWN HEIRS, NOTICE OF ACTION. THE VINEYARDS,a Subdivision 6 16,800 Meed ILES!a5.71l. ELSI LOWY BENEFICIARIES. GRANTEES. ASSIGNORS, DASSIGNORS, Notice Under Fictitious Name Pages 99 throughas recorded in at Book 101 of 30. the Be Board ofheCountyoy given that io ers Mee,February Tfith,d0FFlo r, producing 350 HP. Many CREDITORS AND TRUSTEES OF Law Pursuant to Section Public Records of Collier theeGovernment Center,,i3299 Meeting Room,Thud Naples FL., extras-Borla Exhaust,new THE ESTATE OF GERALDINE H. 865.09. Florida Statutes County Florida, being the Collier andof 3255eewTamiami Trail will consider the Michelin tires.BOSE,leather. PRATHER A/K/A GERALDINE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that described as a whole as en Bab of CCmHy Commitslewn(Beet the polished wheels,Preferred HODGES A/K/A GERALDINE the undersigned,Investments follows: enactment of T a County tResolution.pros The meeting isl commence Equipment Group. Selec- HODGES PRATHER,DECEASED, Eagle, LLC, desiring to Beginning at the Northeast at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed Resolution as follows: five Ride Control. Like new ET AL. engagein business under corner of said Lo51,runA RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF throughout. Very competi- DEFENDANT(S). the Fictitious Name of Eagle North 81 degrees 04'48"West COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,FOR A VARIANCE FROM SECTION Lively priced at$23,500. Investments,located at 3105 for a distance of 127.64 feet to 4.02.03.A,TABLE 4 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO I can email photos. Kevin: NOTICE OF ACTION Dahlia Way. in the County the Westerly line of said Lot REDUCE THE MINIMUM REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (847)922-2934. of COLLIER,in the City of 51;Thence 66.70 feet along SETBACK UNE FROM 20 FEET TO 6.55 FEET FOR A SWIMMING CORVETTE Z51.2015. To:Frederick Prather&The NAPLES,Florida 34105,intends the Westerly line of said Lot POOL,SPA,POOL DECK AND STAIRS ON A WATERFRONT LOT Every option.Yellow.3K mi. Unknown Heirs,Beneficiaries, to register the said name with 51,said Lot 52 and the arc of WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY(RSF-3)ZONING $56,500(239)269.7713. Devisees.Grantees,Assignors, the Division of Corporations a curve to the right,having a DISTRICT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 342 TRADE WINDS LEXUS$5350-2010.Pearl. Creditors and Trustees of the f the Florida Department of radius of 230.00 feet,a central AVENUE,IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 25 Ultra Luxury Package.Pan- Estate of Geraldine H.Prather State, Tallahassee. Florida. angle of 16 degrees 36'53",a EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA.IVA-PL201600011811 UltraoramiL roof,Exc.coed..- a/k/a Geraldine Hodges a/k/a Dated at Naples.Florida,this chord distance of 66.46 feet, mi.$15,200.Exc.Gond.62K. Geraldine Hodges Prather, 8th day of February,2017. bearing North 26 degrees 43' A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the Deceased February 10,2017 No.1481665 l6" East to the Northwest Boar and is available for inspection.All interested parties are MASERATI GRAN TURISMO'13 RESIDENCE: UNKNOWN RETIRE AND BE HAPPY corner of said subdivision: invited to attend and be heard. coupe,red/saddle,11,600 mi., LAST KNOWN ADDRESS:304 NOTICE thence aloe the North line local owned/purchased, n E.Delaware.Immokalee,FL TO REGISTERR INTEFICTITIOUSNT of said subdivision1" South 88 NOTE All persons wishing manager speak p any agenda item must rr.$72,995.(239)908-1221 34142 NAME fdet cos 1e' es East ce xl heiaer tit the County ess . I door al peak rswill of Maserati Transport 2006. YOU ARE HEREBY feet to the Westerly line f the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be Every service documented. NOTIFIED that an action to NOTICE OF ACTION Tract"C"of said subdivision; limited to 3 minutes on any item:The selection of any individual 534,900(2391269-7713. foreclose a mortgage on the thence along said line South to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. following described property Notice Under Fictitious Name 47 degrees 17"East 75.69 If recognized by the Chairman,a spokesperson for a g oup or 6 MERCEDES BENZ 60-CLASS located in Collier County, Law Pursuant to Section feet to the Easterly line of organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an dem. 1987.1987 Mercedes 560SL Florida: said Lot 52;Thence 29.79 feet 33,400 miles.Gorgeous and 865.09, Florida Statutes aloe Me Easter) line of said $ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that g Y Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in meticulously herntained. Lot 29 the West 55 feet of the the undersigned, Between Lot 52 and the arc of a curve the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum Red with leather saddle South 94.58 feet of the East two Hearts,LLC.desiring to to the left having a radius of of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing.In any case, interior,two tops and all the 640 feet of Tract"A"Mainline engage in business under 57.00 feet,a central angle of written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall options. 532,500. Plot Subdivision,accordingus to the the fictitious name Retire and 29 degrees 56'32"a chord be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of (239)353-4018. Plat thereof,as recorded in Be Happy, located at 5600 distance of 29.45 feet bearing seven days prior to the public hearing.All materials used in MERCEDES SL63 AMG 2013 Plat Book 1,at Page 98 of Tamiami Trail North,Suite 13, South 27 degrees 53'27"West presentations before the Board will become a permanent part the Public Records of Co}lier to the Point of Beginning, of the record. Magnetite Black w/Black n the County of Collier,in County,Florida. Any pperson claiming premium leather,4K mi, Naples.Florida 34308,Intends an interest friths surplusirom Window sticker$159,000. t0 register the said name with An person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board Car is Flawless 239.261-2211 has been filed against you, the Division of Corporations the sale,if any,other than the will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and and you are your required to of the Florida Department of Property owner as of the date therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the MERCEDES-BENZ SL500 2003, serve a copy of your written State, Tallahassee. Florida. of the lis pendens must file a proceedings is matle,which record includes the testimony and Iver beige.panoramic top, defenses,if any,to this action, claim within sixty(60)days evidence upon which the appeal is based. garaged In Naples,records, on Gladstone Law Group.P.A., Dated at Naples, Florida, after the sale. The Court,In gg February 8,2017. I 76K mi 515,500.4/3-695-4468 attorneys for plaintiff,whose RETIRE AND BE HAPPY is discretion,may enlarge the If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation PORSCHE 093 C25-1998. address is 1499 W.Palmetto February 10.2017 No.1481133 time of the sale.Notice of the in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at 3K miles,investment car, Park Road,Suite 300,Boca changed time of sale shall be no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please $229,900. (239)269-7713. Raton,FL 33486,and file thepublished as provided herein. contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, original with the Clerk of the Notice Ot Sal' DATED:December 21.2016 located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112. Shelby Bachdraft 427 Roush. Court,within 30 days after the Dwight E.Brock 5356.(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. 1965.550HP.$69,900. first publication of this notice, 1204405CA By:/s/Kathleen Murray (239)269-7713. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF Y Assisted listening devices for the hearing Impaired are available either before or immediately Deputy Clerk of the Court in the Board of County Commissioners Office. VOLKSWAGEN BEETLE-2013. thereafter,otherwise a defe t THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL Gladstone Law Group,P.A. CONVERTIBLE:White body w may be entered against you CIRCUIT,IN AND FOR COLLIER 1499 W.Palmetto Park Road, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS spoiler and black top.Very for the relief demanded in the COUNTY,FLORIDA. Suite 300 COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA low miles e,9980 miles,like Complaint. CASE Na.1204405CA Boca Raton,FL 33486 g PENNY TAYLOR,CHAIRMAN new bletopcondition,includes c con- This notice shall be February 3 01& Bdy i top leather cover. two cons once a week for BANK OF AMERICA. N.A.. February 3&10.20 N7 DWIGHT E.BROCK,Venga CLERK Body in perfect condition. two consecutive weeks in the SUCCESSOR MERGER 70 No.1415304 By: Martha Vergara,Deputy Clerk Peppy and fun to drive. Naples Dally News. LPC HOME LOANSRV SERVICING, $17,500. (239)970-5478. LP NS COUNTRYWIDE HOME (SEAL) DATED:January 30,2017 LOANS SERVICING.LP, Februar 10,2017 No.1481737 Meter cycle s/Mopeds Clerk of the Circuit Court PLAINTIFF, There's I1h f 717,,,,,, By:/s/Kathleen Murray VS. 111P.�i5 n0 y1Q4T RCgUcst(nr Uals HARLEY DAVIDSON- Ladies Deputy Clerk of the Court RYAN CHRISTOPHER,ET AL like L1,, REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS("500") Jacket (M). Dark Maroon DEFENDANT(5). 1111G,..1lere., Leather.$95.(239)775-9521 It you are a person with a FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING MOTORCYCLE TRAILER RAILS disability who needs any NOTICE OFFORECLOSURE SERVICES FOR THE FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY Single set LG aluminum,$55 accommodation in order to SALE Real Estate AUTHORITY (239)261-5026 participateinthis at no proceeding,00 NOTICE IS HEREBY In accordance with the Consultants'Competitive you titled,ce f GIVEN pursuant to the Final Negotiation Act("CCNA"),section 287.055.Florida Statutes, Trucks to you,to the provision of Judgment of Foreclosure the Florida Governmental Utility AuthgritY,a legal entity and Conary assistance. Please dated February 10,2015 n public body created by interlocal aggreementpursuant to section 2011 CHIVY 51LVERADD 1500 contact ADA Coordinator the above action.I will Sell to 163.01,Florida Statutes,("FGUA"),is seeking the services of 4WD Ext.cab LT Florida Edi- Collier County,John Carter, the highest bidder for cash qualified firms or individuals to provide continuing professional tion,36.800 mi. Like new. Administrative Services t Collier County,Florida,on engineering services for the FGUA's water and wastewater utility black exterior,black leach- Manager at 239-252-8000,3315 February 23.2017,at 11:00 AM, systems and potential future acquisitions.The FGUA currently er interior,20"Chrome Clad East Tamiami Trail,Suite 501, at Lobby 3rd Floor Courthouse owns and operates atotal of eighty-eight water and wastewater wheels,EZ lift locking tail- Naples,FL 34112 at least gays Annex of Collier County �,v a utility systems n Alachua,Putnam,Marion,Volusia,Lake, gate,Bluetooth.Rear vision before your scheduled rt Courthouse 3315 1 Tamiami 1��'a'1J Pe�'^5 Seminole,Orange,Citrus,Pasco,Polk,Lee,Hardee,Hillsborough I camera, power windows, appearance,or Inmediatery trail,Naples,FL 34112 for the and Collier Counties.Engineering firms and individuals who are lPe (2tl 776,277.olio •Pon of the tg this current) under contract with the FGUA are required to submit perfect y notification if the time before following described property: Y u quir Call Pete(239)877-6277 Statement of Qualifications at this time. FORD F-150 2008. the scheduled appearance; yue _lWhite. ess than 7 days;if red are1111=11111. Notice Of Sale The FGUA anticipates selecting at least ten(10)firms brand new be0,4.2 engine, hearing or voice Impaired,call that will be required to execute the FGUA's standard Contract bravo new tonieau ewer, Fel, for Consulting/Professional Services within thirty(30)days of good As gas mileage. February 3&10,2017 NOTICE OF PUBLIC AUCTION selection.It is intended that this e Asking$6,500 No.1473085 agreement s willbe for aa term of (413)281-5573. Notice of Public Auction for monies due on Storage Units. three(3)years with optional renewal periods and subject bj an • Auction will beheld on February 20,2017 at or after 8:30am at the annual performance review.Task assignments-b.ca subject V,�ns U-Haul Center of Naples at 2001 E Tamiami Trl Naples FL.Units to scope definition and fee negotiation on a case by-case basis. Real Estate are said to contain common household items.Property Is being The FGUA may choose to select another firm or use n-house DODGE GRAND CARAVAN - sold under Florida Statue 83.806.The names of whose units will staff to perform any of the above services)n whale or in part. 2014.Wheelchair Van with There's n0 place like.here be sold are as follows: No minimamount of professional services or compensation 10"lowered fir,ramp&tie A4 Vincent James R)c)gl)ano$360.80 Is guaranteed to the selected firms. downs.(239)494-8267. C5 Robert Efton Andrews 0493.25 1000.1f1QE{S Februar 3&10,2017 No.1461465SOQs must be mailed or delivered in a sealed envelope Classic Ctrs marked"Continuing Professional Engineering Services COQ"to 2016-CA-2312 Public Notices the FGUA's Operations office,280 Wekiva Springs Road,Suite 10 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF 2070,Longwood,Florida 32779,by mit local time.March 10 THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL PUBLIC NOTICE g0ali Interested iokage f should ns;submit.letter n interest and CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER qualifitions package for consideration.An original and six(6) CIUNTY,FLORIDA The District School Board of Collier County.Florida,will hold a i ogles,along with a complete PDF version of the submittal on C0 Civil Action SpeciM Board MeetinY on Thursday,February 23,2017,at 2:00 s required.Any SOQ received after this advertised deadline will FORD MODEL A-1928.Woody Case NO.2016-CA-2312 p.m.at the Dr.Mediu Luther Kin Jr.Administrative Center,5775 not be considered. Wagon; Older restoration, CAPITAL BANK CORPORATION Osceola Trail,Naples Florida,38109.The purpose of the Special Failure to provide the required copies and information Very presentable.Great mar- F/K/A CAPITAL BANK,N.A.a Board Meeting will be to hear the results of the AdvancED shall result in the SOQ being deemed nonresponsive.The FGUA kettng opportunity for abusi- national banking association, Accreditation findings, reserves the right to reject all SOQs,waive any informalities nessT Rims powder coated. Pla)ntdf, and to request additional information from the applicant if new tires, Priced for Quick The agenda for the Special Board Meeting will be available on necessary.The evaluation ofall ththe sand awarding o contracts Salered,Ri00. Trades Con- NWFP HOLDINGS CORP., a the district website(www.collieraehoole.com)on Thursday, will be done in accordance with the CCNA.The FGUA anticipates sidered.Rick(239)732-1004. Floridar paration; NWFP February 16,2017. approving the selected firms at its April 20,2017 Board of PETROLEUMCORP.,a Florida Director's meeting. Once approved,the selected Consultants All corporation; WNASKEA IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE will be required to provide their employee hourly rate schedule SBA LENDING,INC.;;HAJEEB SCHOOL BOARD WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED, to be utilizeda5 the basis of compensation for the Consultant's ULLAH; BOARD OF COUNTY HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND. Basic and Additional Services and,if necessary,enter into COMMISSIONERS COLLIER THEREFORE,MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD negotiations. COUNTY, FLORIDA and OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE.THE RECORD MUST INCLUDE Veli.cics W:t,r:tt': UNKNOWN TENANTS IN THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS Proposers may download a copy of the FGUA's POSSESSION, TO BE BASED. Professional Engineering Services Request for Qualifications ABSOLUTELY ALL AUTOS- Defendants. Februar 10,2017 No.1476555 package,which includes the evaluation criteria,a copy of the Wanted!Dead or A265-61$ proposed standard contract and FGUA procurement policy,from FREE PICK UP 239-265-6140 NOTICE OF ACTION the FGUA website at haps/bids.}gua.com.Questions regarding CARS,TRUCKS, this SOQ must be in writing and submitted to: MOTORCYCLES,TRAILERS. TO:Najeeb Ulleh LEGAL NOTICE YOU ARE NOTIFIED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR A TOP PRICE.U39)682-8687 that an action to foreclose a SHORT TERM AT WILL LEASE AGREEMENT Robert W.Dickson,P.E.,Capital Program Manager CORVETTES WANTED - Top mortgage on the following 1991 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST.NAPLES,FL 34112 Florida Governmental Utility Suite 2070 Authoritydollar.Cash today.Call 941- property in Collier County, 280 Wekiva Springs Road,Suite 809-3660 or 941-923-3421 Florida: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE COLLIER COUNTY Longwood,FL 32779 PLot 7 and 8,Bleck 1 of NAPLES COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY(CRA)IS PROPOSING rdickson@govmserv.com n@govmserv.c LARGEST (407)629-6900 ,R's,cINes-Autos, dickson@govmserv.com trucks,RV's,239)26.200 to MANORPlat ANNEX according ecto TO IL CRA-OWNED, PROPERTY112LOCATEDID AT38 1991 TAMIAMI E300K.Dave,(239)250-2000 the plat kof as gesrecorded( TRAIL EAST,NAPLES,FL 34112(PARCEL ID#00388440007) with la copy to: In,let aBook ie Pages U) lenelle D.Kusiolek,Project Coordinator STEARNS MOTORS 110 eofr the Public Records of Use of the property shall be for the sole bepurpose of temporary jkusiolek@govmserv.com MOST TRUSTED Collier County,Florida vehicular storage. The Lease term shall be on a month-to- February 10,2017 BUYER Since 1977. has been filed against you and month basis with a minimum bid of$2,500 per month,and all February 10.2017 No.1475661 All Vehicles wanted you are required to serve a maintenance costs and required insurance liability coverage Rod or Jim(239)774-7360 copy of your written defenses, for the property shall be the responsibility of the awarded if any, to it on Thomas bidder.Written proposals must be made by those interested Auto Parts R Au. K. Rmyld), the plaintiff'sws award d days after thel date publication to erthia notice.The attorney,01Tawhose address is awarded t shall enter into a Short Term(30)at Will Lease 2007 TRAILORoroTOWING SuTamiami N Trail North, tepment with the CRA notice thine days add days from the HITCH s motor homes,rSuite hi Naples, Florida last publication iofs this ds a order by the CRA toadditionalbe less stress frame towing of 34103 twithin thirty(3days termsandconditionsdeemedCunt'CotheCRAeowenlid side 095016,towing Nf first publicationwsan in the bh tolthe beBoard ofCoinity othcostsCommissioners.Theoci ted ed ��/� vehicle, (239,04-167s. Naples Daily News,and file s bidderhepa shat alson be responsible for the costs associated with $1500.(239)40a-3167. original with the clerk of this the publication of this notice. VOLVO CAR TOP LUGGAGE court ether before service carrier fits V-70 2004-'10. on the plaintiff's attorney The CRA has negotiated with TT of Naples Inc.for a Short Term Q7 Nice!$195.(269)330-8899. or immediately thereafter; at Will Lease Agreement but has no commitment or obligation Y7 V otherwise a default will to accept such proposal. � be entered against you for • I I the relief demanded in the Copies of the draft Short Term at Will Lease Agreement as well RTE complaint or petition. as additional information may be obtained by contacting Elly a#1.... Lega)s Dated on February 7.2017. Soto MCKuen or Michelle Arnold at(239)643-1115. SE DWIGHT E.BROCK / COLLIER COUNTY CIRCUIT PLEASE FORWARD PROPOSALS BIDS TO;(Indicate'PROPOSAL' •Manage your subscription Notice COURT on the envelope) •Find a newsstand to buy a paper Clerk of the Court Mrs.Michelle Arnold,PTNE Director 1120RCUIT 1995 By:/s/Patricia Murphy Bayshore/Gateway Triangle CRA •Place an obituary,classified ad or press release IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF As Deputy Clerk 3570 Bayshore Drive •Submit news THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL Bond. Schoeneck, & King, Naples,Florida 34112 •Submit a letter to the editor CIRCUIT,IN AND FOR COLLIER PLLC. Report o problem COUNTY,FLORIDA. Attn:Thomas K.R)nald),Esq. (2391 643-1115 • CASE No. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, 112016CA0019950001XX Suite#250 PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AFTER'THE NOON www.napleanews.com/Customerservioe Naples,FL 34103 HOUR ON MARCH 13,2017.THE CRA AND THE BOARD OF `,'� qLL� CITIFINANCIAL SERVICING Phone:(239)659-3866 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REJECT ALL Naples $1 News LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED Fax:(239)659-3812 PROPOSALS BIDS AND/OR NEGOTIATE WITH THE QUALIFIED jam' }rl LIABILITY COMPANY, February 10,17.24 and March BIDDER ON ANY PROVISIONS OF THE PROPOSED LEASE. .sm,,,...w.00.....we.. PLAINTIFF. 3.2017 No.1481796 February 10,2017 No.1481853 8 A apLrzi ?'rwø NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT 1481737 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA Pub Dates February 10,2017 (Sign are of affiant) 2-'4-77 Sworn to and subscribed before me 4 ,on;,,C;,,,, IVONNE GORI This February 6,2017 4 • Art ,, Notary Public-State of Florida ' •= Commission *FF 900870 d,t�?= My Comm.Expires Jul 16.2019 1t8rig`'• ' , Bonded through National Notary Assn. Pi)t-C ri 1061/1111"41,•81111 (Signatur of affiant) ' 2130 Friday,February 10,2017 Naples Daily News v A N„Dien. Notice Of Sale Public Notices Po!,I,N t CHEVROLET CORVETTE-2001 VS. NOTICE OF INTENT TO All of Lot 52 and that part of NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Convertible.Pristine Torch REGISTER FICTITIOUS NAME. Lot 51.of VILLA VISTANA AT NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION Red over Black convertible. THE UNKNOWN HEIRS. NOTICE OF ACTION. THE VINEYARDS,a Subdivision 6 Speed Manual.VERY LOW BENEFICIARIES, DEVISEES, as recorded in Plat Book 30, Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday,February 28,2017,in 16,800 MILES!5.7L LS1 V8 GRANTEES. ASSIGNORS, Notice Under Fictitious Name Pages 99 through 101 of the the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor. producing 350 HP. Many CREDITORS AND TRUSTEES OF Law Pursuant to Section Public Records of Collier Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East.Naples FL., extras-Bode Exhaust,new THE ESTATE OF GERALDINE H. 865.09, Florida Statutes County. Florida, being the Bard of County Commissioners(BCC)will consider the Michelin tires,BOSE,leather, PRATHER A/K/A GERALDINE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that described as a whole as enactment of a County Resolution.The meeting will commence polished wheels,Preferred HODGES A/K/A GERALDINE the undersigned.Investments follows: at 9109 A.M.The title of the proposed Resolution is as follows: Equipment Group. Selec- HODGES PRATHER,DECEASED, Eagle, LLC, desiring to Beginning at the Northeast five Ride Control. Like new ET AL. engage in business under corner of said Lot 51, run A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF throughout.Very competi- DEFENDANT(S). the Fictitious Name of Eagle North 81 degrees 04'48"West COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,FOR A VARIANCE FROM SECTION tively priced at$23,500. Investments,located at 3105 for a distance of 127.64 feet to 4.02.03.6,TABLE 4 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO I can email photos. Kevin: NOTICE OF ACTION Dahlia Way, in the County the Westerly line of said Lot REDUCE THE MINIMUM REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (847)922-2934. of COLLIER. in the City of 51;Thence 66.70 feet along SETBACK LINE FROM 20 FEET TO 6.55 FEET FOR A SWIMMING CORVETTE 291.201S. T0:Frederick Prather&The NAPLES.Florida 34105,intends the Westerly line of sed Lot POOL,SPA,POOL DECK AND STAIRS ON A WATERFRONT LOT Every option.Yellow.3K mi. Unknown Heirs,Beneficiaries, to register the said name with 51,sod Lot 52 and the arc of WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY(RSF-3)ZONING $56,500(239)269-7713. Devisees,Grantees,Assignors, the Division of Corporations a Curve to the right,having a DISTRICT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 342 TRADE WINDS IEXUS 55 380-2010.Pearl. Creditors and Trustees of the of the Florida Department of radius of 230.00 feet,a central AVENUE,IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 20 Package. Estate of Geraldine H.Prather State Tallahassee. Florida. angle of36 degrees 36'53",a EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA.(VA-PL20160001181) Ultra Luxury Package.Pan- oramic roof.Exc. P 62K a/k/a Geraldine Hodges a/k/a Dated at Naples,Florida.this chord distance of 66.46 feet, mi.$15,200.(973)271-6786. Geraldine Hodges Prather, 8th day of February,2017. bearing North 26 degrees 43 A copy of the proposed tion is on file with the Clerk to the Deceased February 10,2017 No.1481665 16" East to the Northwest Board and is available foror inspection.All interested parties are MASERATI GRAN TURISMO'I3 RESIDENCE: UNKNOWN RETIRE AND BE HAPPY corner of said subdivision; invited to attend and be heard. coupe,red/saddle,11,600 mi., LAST KNOWN ADDRESS:304 thence along the North line NOTICE OF INTENT d NOTE:All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must local owned/purchased,in E.Delaware,Immokalee,FL TO REGISTER FICTITIOUS f said subdivision South BB Warr.$72.995.(239)908-1221 34142 NAME degrees 1e' les East 54.53 agister with the County manager prior to presentation of YOU ARE HEREBY feet to the Westerlyline of thea agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be Maserati Transport 2006. 9e ' NOTIFIED that an action to Tract"C"of Said subdivision:division; limitetl to minutes on any item;The selection Of any individual Every service documented. NOTICE OF ACTION $34,900(239)269-7713. foreclosed mortgage On the thenceeg along said Kae South to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged following described property Notice Under Fictitious Name degrees 8' East 75.69 If recognized by the Chairman,a spokesperson for a group or MERCEDES-BENZ 560-CLASS located in Collier County. Law Pursuant t0 Section feet to the Easterly line of organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an Item. 1987.1987 Mercedes 560SL Florida: rano Lot 52;Thence 29.79 feet 33,400 miles.Gorgeous and 865.09, Florida Statutes along the Easterly line of said $ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that g Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in meticulously maintained. Lot 29 the West 55 feet of the Lot 52 and the arc of a curve the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum Red with leather saddle South 94.58 feet of the East the undersigned, Between to the left having a radius of weeks interior,two tops and all the 640 feet of Tract"A"Mainline Two gHearts,LLC.desiring to 57.00 feet.a central angle of of rtten materials mended rior to the [otbe consitleredublic abff a Boaring.In rd shall options. 532,500. Subdivision,according to the (he fictitious mime Retire and 29 degrees 56'3e a chord be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of (239)353-4018. Plat thereof,as recorded in distance of 29.45 feet bearing seven days prior to the public hearing.All materials used in Plat Book 1,at Page 98,of Be Happy, located at 5600 South 27 degrees 53'27"West MERCEDES SL63 AMG 2013 Tamiami Trail North,Suite 13, presentations before the Board will become a permanent part the Public Records of Collier to the Point of Beginning: of the record. Magnetite Black w/Black the County of Collier, n premium leather,46 mi, County,Florida. Naples,Florida 34108,intends Any person claiming Window sticker$159,000. to register the said name with an interest in the surplus from An7Y person who decides to appeal any decision of the Bard Car is Flawless 239-261-2211 has been filed against you. the Division of Corporations the sale,if any,other than the II need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and and you are required to of the Florida Department of property owner as of the date therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the MERCEDES-BENZ SlSa 2003, serve a copy of your written State, Tallahassee, Florida. of the los entlens must file a proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and silver beige,panoramic top, defenses,if any.to this action, claim thin six, (60)days evidence upon which the appeal is based. Dated of Naples. Florida, garaged$5,00.443,records, an orneys for Law Group,P.A., February 8,2017. itttdrthe sane. TM Court.Ie 76K mi$15,500.443-695-4468 attorneys for plaintiff,whose RETIRE AND BE HAPPY its discretion.may enlarge the If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation PORSCHE 993 C2S-1998. address is 1499 W.Palmetto February 10,2017 No.1481133 time of the sale.Notice of the in order to participate in this proceeding,you,are entitled,at 36 miles,investment car, Park Road,Suite 300,Boca changed time of sale shall be no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please $229,900. (239)269-7713. Raton.FL 33486,and file the published as provided herein. contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, Shelby eatkdmft 427 Ronah. original with the Clerk of the Notice Of Sal<• DATED:December 21,2016 located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples.FL 3411g2- f first publication of within 30 days sfter noti eco y/s/KathleetnEBrock Murrray Ass Assisted listening devices for the beaming impaired to are available 1965.SSOHP.$69,900. 1204405CA g: prior (239)269-7713. either before or immediateyy IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF Deputy Clerk of the Court in the Board of County Commissioners Office.r VOLKSWAGEN BEETLE•2013. thereafter,otherwise inefault THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL Gladstone Law Group,P.A. CONVERTIBLE:White body w may be entered against you CIRCUIT,IN AND FOR COLLIER 1499 W.Palmetto Park Road, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS spoiler and black top.Very for the relief demanded in the COUNTY,FLORIDA. Suite 300 COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA low mileage.9980 miles.like Complaint. CASE No.1204405CA Boca Raton,FL 33486 9 P PENNY TAYLOR.CHAIRMAN new ble top includes con- This node shall be February 3 01& edy i top leather cover. published once a week for BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., February3&10,2017 DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK Body in perfect Condition. two Consecutive weeks in the SUCCESSOR AN MERGER TO No.1415304 By: Martha Vergara,Deputy Clerk Peppy and fun to drive. Naples Daily News. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, (SEAL) $17,500. (239)970-5478. LP FNA COUNTRYWIDE HOME DATED:January 30,2017 LOANS SERVICING,LP, Februar 10.2017 No.1481737 Motorcycles/Mopeds Clerk of the Circuit Court PLAINTIFF, ThVS. ere's no pl,.,,,. Request los Bids Request for Bids By:ty/Kathleen the courtray RYAN CHRISTOPHER,ET AL. There's 1, re! HARIEY DAVIDSON- Ladies Deputy Clerk of Court DEFENDANT(5). like...here! REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS moon Jacket (M). Dark Maroon FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING Leather.$95.(239)775-9521 If you area person with a NOTICE OF RECLOSURE SERVICES FOR THE FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY MOTORCYCLE TRAILER RAILS disability who needs any SAIF AUTHORITY Single set LG aluminum,$55 accommodation in order to Real Estate (239)261.5026 yea ate in this proceeding,cnt NOTICE IS HEREBY In accordance with the Consultants'Competitive you areentitled,at nosi tat GIVEN pursuant to the Final Negotiation Act("CCNA") section 287.055,Florida Statutes, Trucks to you,to the provision of )ud enc of Foreclosure the Florida Governmental Utility Authority,a legal entity and iori certain a tante. Please 9m interlocal 2011 CHEVY SILVERADO 1$00 contact ADA Coordinator dated February 10.2015 n141 163.01 ublichFbiida Statutes created by ('FGUA")9ris seekingr he services of 4WD Ext.cab LT Florida Edi- Collier County,John Carter, the shgove action,I will sell to tion,36,800 mi Like new, Administrative Services ft Collier County Florida,on qualified firms or individuals to provide cOntinumg professional Manager at 239-252-8800,3315 engineering services for the FGUA's water and wastewater utility black exterior,black leach- Februar 23,2017,at 11:00 AM, systems and potential future acquisitions.The FGUA currently er interior,20"Chrome Clad East Tamiami Trail Suite 501, Y _ owns and operates a total of eighty-eight water and wastewater wheels,EZ lift locking tail- Naples,FL 34112 at least 7 days at Lobby 3rd Floor Courthouse - utility systems m Alachua.Putnam,Marion,Volusia,Lake, gate,Bluetooth,Rear vision before your scheduled court Annex of Collier County to' Seminole,Orange,Citrus,Pasco,Polk,Lee,Hardee,Hillsborough camera, power windows, appearance,or immediately Courthouse 3315 1 Tamiami and Collier Counties.Engineering firms and individuals who are perfect bedy$26,999.oho the re i g thi9 Trail,Naples.FL 34112 for the Currently under contract with the FGUA are require to Submit a Call Pete(239)877-6277 notitieation ii the time before following described property: q the scheduled appearance is Statement of Qualifications at this time. FORD F-150 2008. less than 7 days;if you are The FGUA anticipate selecting at least ten(10)firms White.6.5 bed,4.2 engine, Haring or voice impaired,call NO II,,.OI S-t1, P 9 brand new tonneau cover, 7j1, that will be required to execute the FGUA's standard Contract good gas mileage. February 3&10,2017 NOTICE OF PUBLIC AUCTION for Consulting/Professional Services within thirty(30)days of Asking$6,500 No.1473x5 selection.It is intended that this agreement will be for a term of (413)281-5573. Notice of Public Auction for monies due on Storage Units. three(3)years with optional renewal periods and subject to an Auction will be held on February 20,2017 at or after 8:30am at the annual performance review.Task assignments will be subject Vans ®..Real Estate U-Haul Center of Naples at 2001E Tamiami Tr!Naples FL.Units to elope definition and fee negotiation er a case-by-case basis. are said to contain common household items.Property is being The FGUA may Choose to select another firm e-use in-house DODGE GRAND CARAVAN - sold under Florida Statue 83.806.The names of whose units will staff to perform any of the above services in whole or in part. 2014.Wheelchair Van with There'snopinee Re...here be sold are as follows: No minimum amount of professional services or compensation 10"lowered fir,ramp&tie A4 Vincent lames Ricigliano$360.80 is guaranteed to the selected firms. downs.(239)494-8267. CS Robert Ekon Andrews $493.25 localfieds SOQs must be mailed or delivered in a sealed envelope Februar 3&30,2017 No.1461465 marked"Continuity Prohssioal Engineering Services COQ"to 2016-CA-2312 Public N:,tices 207 F, Ung Opcone Floridari office,280 Wekiva,, catim,Road,Suite IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF 2017,Longwood,Nby 2pmit local time,March 1n THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL PUBLIC NOTICE quali c Interested kagieshouldnsi submit a letter iofo lsi and CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER qualifications along withhkaco for to PD versionron original and sin CD CIUNTY,FLORIDA The District School Board of Collier County,Florida,will hold a iopies,• along received PDF of the submittal on CD OM Civil Action Special Board Meeting on Thursday,February 23,2017,at 2100 s 1 be con.Any SOQ after this advertised deadline will FORD MODEL A A.1920.Woody Case NO.2016-CA-2312 p.m.at the Dr.Marlin Luther King Jr.Administrative Center.5775 not be Considered. Wagon; Older restoration, CAPITAL BANK CORPORATION Osceola Trail,Naples,Florida,34109.The purpose of the Special Failure to provide the required copies and information Very presentable.Great mar. F/K/A CAPITAL BANK,N.A.a Board Meeting will be to hear the results of the AdvancED shall result in the SOQ being deemed nonresponsive.The FGUA keting opportunity for abusi. national banking association, Accreditation findings. reserves the right to reject all SOOs,waive any informalities nes$!Rims powder coated, Plaintiff, and to request additional information from the applicant if new tires. Priced for Quick v. The agenda for the Special Board Meeting will be available on necessary.The evaluation of all SOQs and awarding of contracts Sale!$25,000.Ri00. Trades Con- NWFP HOLDINGS CORP., the district website(www.colliersehoou.am)on Thursday, will be done in accordance with the CCNA.The FGUA anticipates sidered.Rick di(239)732-1004. Florida corporation; NWFP February 16,2017. approving the selected firms at its April 20.2017 Board of PETROLEUM CORP.,a Florida DlII b0 's meeting. Once approved,the selected Consultants PETROLEUM corporation; W.;NAJEEB A IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE ill he required to Provide their employee hourly rate schedule SBA LENDING,INC.;NAJESCHOOL BOARD WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED, to be utilized as the basis of compensation for the Consultant's ULLAH;BOARD OF COUNTY HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND, Basic and Additional Services and,if necessary,enter into COMMISSIONERS COLLIER THEREFORE,MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD negotiations. COUNTY, FLORIDA and OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE.THE RECORD MUST INCLUDE Vehicles Wanted UNKNOWN TENANTS IN THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS Proposers may download a Copy of the FGUA's POSSESSION, TO BE BASED. Professional Engineering Services Request for Qualifications ABSOLUTELY ALL AUTOS- Defendants. Februar 10,2017 No.1476555 package,which includes the evaluation criteria,a copy of the Wanted!Dead or Alive Top$ proposed standard contract and FGUA procurement policy.from FREE PICK UP 239-265-6140 NOTICE OF ACTION Recl Llest h,r 6,d, the FGUA website at https://bidsigua.com.Questions regarding CARS,TRUCKS, this SOQ must bein writing and submitted to: MOTORCYCLES,TRAILERS. TO:Naleeb Ulleh LEGAL NOTICE TOP PRICE.(239)682-8687 YOU ARE NOTIFIED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR A Robert W.Dickson.P.E.,Capital Program Manager that an action to foreclose a SHORT TERM AT WILL LEASE AGREEMENT Florida Governmental Utility Authority CORVETTES WANTED - Top mortgage on the following 1991 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST,NAPLES,FL 34112 280 Wekwa Springs Road.Suite 2070 dollar.Cash today. Call 941- property in Collier County, Longwood,FL 32779 809-3660or UTERI923-3421 Florida: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE COLLIER COUNTY rdicks;(407)onrser00 LARGEST BUYER IN FL-Autos, Lot 7 and 8,NEck I of NAPLES COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY(CRA)IS PROPOSING rdickson@govmserv.com trucks.RV's.cycles.$1K to MANOR ANNEX according to TO LEASE CRA-OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1991 TAMIAMI MOM Dave,(239)250-2000 the Plat thereof as recorded TRAIL EAST,NAPLES,FL 34112(PARCEL ID 000388440007) with a copy to: n Plat Book 1,Pages(s) andle D.Kusiolek,Project Coordinator STEARNS MOTORS 110 of the Public Records of Use of the property shall be for the sole purpose of temporary jeemelek@ eereee,eere MOST TRUSTED Collier County,Florida. vehicular storage. The Lease term shall be on a month-to- February 142017 BUYER Since 1977. has been filed against you and month basis with a minimum bid of$2,500 per month,and all February 14 2017 No.1475661 All Vehicles wanted you are required to serve a maintenance costs and required insurance liability coverage Rod or Jim(239)774-7360 copy of your written defenses, for the property shall be the responsibility of the awarded if any, to it on Thomas bidder.Witten proposals must be made by those interested K. Rmaldi, the plaintiff's within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.The attorney, whose address s awarded bidder shall enter into a Short Term at Will Lease 2007 TRAILOR TOAD TOWING 4001 Tmiami Trail North, Agreement with the CRA within thirty days(30)days from the HITCH for motor homes, Suite 250, Naples, Florida last publication of this notice in order to address additional . less stress on frame door& 34103 within thirty(30)days terms and conditions deemed necessary,by the CRA to then be -A/ side walls of towing of first publication n the submitted to the Board of County Commissioners.The awarded 4/7 vehicle,300010,15in tires, Naples Daily News,and file the bidder shall also be responsible for the costs associated with $1500.(239)404-3167. original with the clerk of this the publication of this notice. 2 VOLVO CAR TOP LUGGAGE court either before service carrier fits V-70 2004-'30. on the plaintiff's attorney The CRA has negotiated with TT of Naples Inc.for a Short Term i.a qa Nice!$195.(269)330-8899. or Immediately thereafter; at Will Lease Agreement but has no commitment or obligation eS7 �Gi otherwise a default ill to accept such proposal. be entered against you for 4 '�� the relief demanded in the Copies ti the draft Short Term at Will Lease Agreement as well 'I Lnnals ' II complaint or petition. as additional information may be obtained by contacting Elly Wie yeme Dated on February 7,2017. Soto MCKuen or Michelle Arnold at(239)643-1115. .1 B,Y DWIGHT E.BROCK COLLIER COUNTY CIRCUIT PLEASE FORWARD PROPOSALS BIDS TO:(Indicate'PROPOSAL' •Manage your subscription N,,Iice COURT on the envelope) •Fled a newsstand to buy a paper Clerk of the Court Mrs.Michelle Arnold.PTNE Director 1120 1995 By:is/Patricia Murphy Bayshore/Gateway Triangle CRA •Place en obituary,classified ad or press release IN THE CIRCUITRCUIT COURT OF As Deputy Clerk 3570 Bayshore Drive •Submit news THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL Bond. Schueneck, & King, Naples,Florida 34112 •Submit a letter to the editor CIRCUIT,IN AND FOR COLLIER PLLC, COUNTY,FLORIDA. Attn:Thomas K.Rinaldi,Esq. (239)643-1115 •Report a problem CASE No. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, 112016CA00199500016% Suite 41250 PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AFTER THE NOON www.naplesaews.com/customerserrice Naples,FL 34103 HOUR ON MARCH 13,2017.THE CRA AND THE BOARD OF CITIFINANCIAL SERVICING Phone:(239)659-3866 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REJECT ALL Napir$Battu attu dews LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED Fax:(239)659-3812 PROPOSALS BIDS AND/OR NEGOTIATE WITH THE QUALIFIED 1� LL K LIABILITY COMPANY, February 10,17,24 and March BIDDER ON ANY PROVISIONS OF THE PROPOSED LEASE. ••� � «r PLAINTIFF, 3,2017 N0.1481796 February 10,2017 No.1481853 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP 8 A TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the County Attorney Office at the time the item is placed on the agenda. All completed routing slips and original documents must be received in the County Attorney Office no later than Monday preceding the Board meeting. **NEW** ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines#1 through#2 as appropriate for additional signatures,dates,and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exception of the Chairman's signature,draw a line through routing lines#1 through#2,complete the checklist,and forward to the County Attorney Office. Route to Addressee(s) (List in routing order) Office Initials Date 1. 2. 3. County Attorney Office County Attorney Office 37/)7 4. BCC Office Board of County b Commissioners j-' J ,(S), -3\1. L\\"\ 5. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office —Ftn 3loctir1 Z�52pm PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the Executive Summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above,may need to contact staff for additional or missing information. Name of Primary Staff Fred Reischl,Planning Zoning Phone Number 252-4211 Contact/ Department Agenda Date Item was February 28,2017 Agenda Item Number 8.A Approved by the BCC Type of Document Resolution Number of Original 1 Attached 2-ol7—35 Documents Attached PO number or account number if document is /c - to be recorded INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark"N/A" in the Not Applicable column,whichever is Yes N/A(Not appropriate. (Initial) Applicable) 1. Does the document require the chairman's original signature? 2. Does the document need to be sent to another agency for additional signatures? If yes, N/A provide the Contact Information(Name;Agency;Address;Phone)on an attached sheet. 3. Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be signed by the Chairman,with the exception of most letters,must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. 4. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County Attorney's N/A Office and all other parties except the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board 5. The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the document or the final negotiated contract date whichever is applicable. 6. "Sign here"tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's signature and initials are required. 7. In most cases(some contracts are an exception),the original document and this routing slip should be provided to the County Attorney Office at the time the item is input into SIRE. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines! 8. The document was approved by the BCC on 02/28/17 and all changes made during e; e. the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the changes,if applicable. 4.1. 9. Initials of attorney verifying that the attached document is the version approved by the t~ ctt BCC,all changes directed by the BCC have been made, and the document is ready for he ".` �' :_,;,t Chairman's signature. I:Forms/County Forms/BCC Forms/Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04,Revised 1.26.05,Revised 2.24.05;Revised 11/30/12 8 A Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S.Vergara Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 11:39 AM To: Reischl, Fred; Stone, Scott Subject: Resolution 2017-35 -VA-PL20160001181 Trade Winds Ave Attachments: Resolution 2017-035.pdf Hi Fred & Scott, Attached for your records is a scanned copy of the aforementioned resolution. Do you need this to be recorded? Thanks, Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Dept. Clerk of the Circuit Court & Value Adjustment Board Office: (239) 252-7240 Fax: (239) 252-8408 E-mail: martha.vergara@collierclerk.com 1 8A • RESOLUTION 17 - 35 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 4.02.03.A, TABLE 4 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK LINE FROM 20 FEET TO 6.55 FEET FOR A SWIMMING POOL, SPA, POOL DECK AND STAIRS ON A WATERFRONT LOT WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY (RSF-3) ZONING DISTRICT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 342 TRADE WINDS AVENUE, IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [VA-PL20160001181] WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a variance from Section 4.02.03.A, Table 4 of the Land Development Code to reduce the minimum rear yard accessory structure setback line from 20 feet to 6.55 feet for a swimming pool, spa, pool deck and stairs on a waterfront lot, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A", in the Residential Single-Family (RSF-3) Zoning District for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 9.04.00 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: Petition Number VA-PL20160001181, filed by Jason Jenks of Jenks Builders, Inc. on behalf of Roxanne Stone-Jeske and Nancy D. Koeper, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: X16-CPS-01573/1313827/1]40 Rev. 1/20/17 Petition no. VA-PL20160001181 /342 Tradewinds Ave. 1 8 A Lot 11, Block M, CONNERS VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES, Unit 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 17, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Folio No. 27585200007 be and the same hereby is approved for a variance from Section 4.02.03.A, Table 4 of the Land Development Code to reduce the minimum rear yard accessory structure setback line from 20 feet to 6.55 feet for a swimming pool, spa, pool deck and stairs on a waterfront lot, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A", in the zoning district wherein said property is located, and subject to the Conditions of Approval described in the attached Exhibit"B." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this or day of r- uq: , 2017. ATTEST: , , BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. BROCIK.;VLERK COLL E•0:UNTY, FLORIDA By: ' t ' B y Q1/4 , Depdt ler Penny or , Chai Attest as to Chairman's signature only. Approved as to form and legality: '/a./1'7 Scott A. Stone Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit B—Conditions of Approval [16-CPS-01573/1313827/1]40 Rev. 1/20/17 Petition no. VA-PL20160001181 /342 Tradewinds Ave. 2 Exhibit A 8 A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF LOT 11,BLOCK"M",UNIT No.2,CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3,PAGE 17,OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS,RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD. TBM FD PIT N&D156 "P5M 0667' 1215' (R ) 1215.12'(M) O 0.11'W.,NAVD ELEV.4-02.88 O m FD.MAIL IN PVMT.CU(MOLE TRADE WINDS AVE. ,-- 160'(tz) 760.07'lC) 1 w --- +1 -75.01' ^�/7}�^--. .6 -...--41---...--§.---y....-_.. > I a,� l PD.PE NAIL IN PVMT. 7 30.0 _ cur 601.E,o.06'W ,1 PD.NAIL SHAPT -' 9066 OF PVMT. IN PVAAT.LUT- Cg Z.? p 6 v HOLE 0 g ^ nra { __= � O 2' RGP�� — ' W M p 588`04'10U75.00' R) 75.01'(C) fu .R 4 0 } 62M.... P5M 5762" 0.03 a.D7'W. CoOm pNQ ❑WM 4"PV�60- FrIR 5 0.52'S,0.29'E. a ( JmCc m W O Z LLI I Q 7.65'r o 14 24.0' '^ 765' 9 M, m nv 14.0' b N O DJ �p0 $.05'm p5� o O b - c,1 in 9.0' to ,0 u ,542 TRADE WINDS 4VE. BLOCK M C.B.S. HOUSE (under consL.l w FIN. FLOOR ELEV +'10,4 F. b (0 to NOTE 20.6 7,0 V V1 PER CONTRACTOR,POOL/PATIO 2.05'`' S' v 15.0' $ STEMVALL. IS AT ELEV. +03.� 4.35'6' _ X M, D.e' -� 6.65' a �) �-Jam--_-r 0 SET DRILLUOLE �' ' IN TOP OF LONA. 5EA0LI yg 7' 4'61614 NAVD ELEV. +00.31 765'`) C.B.b.RETAINING WALL 1 ALUM.FENCE A.8.4,,5TA1 S�+ 11 (under r+dnst� j If-,, i I 1.35'WIDE COMA. SEAWALL CAP rrT 4' ,1.1 588°04'l0"W 75.OQ'(R) 75.011 CM) $ 0 111 0 5ET PRILLROLE in 1NTOP OF LONA.SEAWALL Ln NAVE ELEV. +03.32 w A r E: R W A Y SCALE:1"—20" 9-5 -15 0815025 C010.52 VACANT/NAVD E?LEVS P.R.N.' -pERMANe'ITNr raga_ BEARINGS BASED ON:V TEASE WINDS AVE.AS.688'04'10'M PER MORD PLO DATE ORDER FIELD 8001( REVISIONS MONUMEM ELEVATIONS BASED ON:NAVA 1988(ORIG.ON GL DNR c0L 29 104 05m) SIR-SETG��g'IRON ROD' LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE:AE(10') 5-19.16 05160(5 0010-52 FOUNDATION/ELE!(CEKT�#4=6Er%4f IRON ROD PER F.I,R.M. DATED:5 16.2012 :20210 01896 W OMNI SURVEY 1215000 CO10.52 9T£Mw4L.L E:'—EV NarEC.M.rec0 RETE MONUMENTS' CERTIFICATEI harsh FIR FOUND IRON ROD Y cahe above sketch correctly () NAIL N(T-T1N,0-DISR) represents o landnd that t_survey de by m •or under my VALID FD.-FOUND direct supervision and moats the thfnirnurn technical R —RECORD otandorde set forth by the Florida Board of ONLY MEASURED Professional as Surveyors In Cl,5!-17050-5!-17052 FL WITH C CALCULATED Adminiatrotive Code,Pursuant to Section 472027,Florida -DRNNACE EASEMEM Statutes.I further certify that R 4 any for the Janda EMBOSSED OMNI SURVEYS, INC. 0 re DEED PDE_ PUBUC f fr EASEMENT ham deeaHbed and is solid any with Be raised SEAL 6)1WM -WATER METER • bossed a eyoYe cool of the undersigned,it le not o WV-WATER VALVE certification of 7�U.,Zoning or Ireodom of encumbrances, F11 —FIRE HYDRANT LB 6584 MH MANHOLE(SS—SAN,STS-STORM) RCP-REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CMP-CORRUGATE METAL PIPE TEL 239 939-3666 ME-MITERED END Y+Jt ifia FAX (239) 939-7181 CR,,"'CATCH 84SIN Sco Morhenko, ��AA 14* 7r� -POtE�(L-LpICHT,P-POWER) - 7' 4568 TYLION COURT FORT M(C3$) FL 33907 l'-0 L-"Y Florida Registration No.4920 $ A EXHIBIT B Conditions of Approval 1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 2. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. 3. Upon demolition or destruction of 50 percent or more of the actual replacement value of the swimming pool, spa, pool deck and stairs, this variance will be void and any reconstruction shall meet setback requirements at the time of a building permit. 4. The owner shall apply decorative cladding, or install a berm or landscaping or combination thereof, to shield the view of the portion of exposed stem/concrete retaining wall so that there is only a maximum of four feet of stem/concrete retaining wall exposure. [16-CPS-01561/1302517/1] CAO 33 Z CD so 8 A 3 -< ° CD CD '-w rn DC) : 0\,Q - o ° d-< = c0cz '° 0 -1 `� 37 1 CD ?7 0m rrt E -=1 0 = ,-„, (.,,q. z ,7, ___-- 0 . &/30 _. pz c., -0 __, 0 C P ..pQ C7 m Mc MI co W a � i ..fl r-- m -4A 33 0 0 com o � r0D 0 - r M r " - m i > Cm -T1 J o faCi = 0aj rn --' --I ' LIZ a, cie --I © O -Ti m O pp cn o r rnrn 3 .3 > Q 2 3 w.... Crn 3 - m r- CO Z g 0 ...,1 O -0 0 - - m ... -icn Q 3D m -46 Cf) O r C s Z o7 > M rm-- � M Q '')->j Z 1610111 II m -rt M 37 ? Q Ci , zQ oW o -n rDo ecn ® N (,% -i 0 — - z -iom t� t!) r --1 0 I m M -moi tip > �m ...4 -iC ). .. / :P m x 0 o a Z rte-- (g) 1to m r M as o o Xi m O rwi xr c 3 E` m rn •< A E. < z U3 0v, rn I- --1 s0 Z m - rn r ca -C =1 \ 35-C a = = per,.? f m m op m (7) { c 3 r- m 2 x P Z -1Z m 2 co m z o- � 3 8 A -< p CD 2 (D -< 0m <1) l v = o 0. Cp 3 i=7:m ...< 17 z 0n o r; CD t- m m - i , , a � m ‹ m` o3 C � � . ) C7 z En 0 M v zm 0 C CJ70 .-1 ?.= z ,r m -I c O ti m jjm --1 20 =y, r" -1 Cf) = G) ca -- o v zm rn G ', -n rr- p m A cf. -- r-jl >r - m� ' 0 C5 > = : z =n CO N 71Z C7 _4 0 O G) ' _ - mCO O.A O . rn ", V) map Cps -4 op -nmaa) u) o 2) a) rT-1w � Qnz 3 t�h r � r- le, ..T.,› m %Q --10 .0 0zzm - el= op c 33 mnz -. 12. 6 .� 1'77 -ri --1 C7 y m ccp 0 m 0 Mo m > z - � cno 0 m -0 z -IZQ v v > - Fz › --nom 1 m --D m z - = � m O ox ic Vi `� cn r- 33 rn o v Wo © = a Zm rt7'1 rn cp E -z U) G) ( -4 m o CIS to --1 C'} mm © � > b 0 z r : r_-_ 33 C p ,W,,,1 = m - m = i0 a3 m mrn w C7 rn- m 2 mz > pyo., _ -1 o O 0 m2 . . m 1:10 8A a z 0 ... -‹ r- CD CD = CD -‹ 0 FCD 1 ,, ci = -o 0 co 33 = `, ' su c a co 0 — :' fD7 0. co (-) GD , --1 0 33 ...i "0 Ci > _< no , sm.. - 0 ....t ' -'‘. r. m r- --i O .-... > 55 -•': = '-''' m 5 - n 0 co m -7 •=9 0 m = z --- j9 .c... CD C,1) ---1 --4 (j) > 0 2- cii m ,...., z •• - 0 m ® 2- m L- H or) z 0 " r- z 2 'V --I 0 C p C\--' - h-- 1- r-.13 2 0 Iv .. mDD -I -4 2 c, ..) ‘, › m 1- 0 RI -I > 7) 0 Li CO co 0 > M - r- 00 (D --1 3: , -4m E 2> E.: m 0 ..-.5 > -- D) EC z ' 0 Z 7S -11 Z C) =I Fyil c''.< i 54 cD m 3:j 0...... 000 ca =m 00 %..1 > 0 2 y 3 11911101111N xi Do DJ r"m :0m r m 0 DCG)azzr, .; = K 0 0 ., (A 6 73* 41, r- cn o .... z _co > ,., ' -......0 '\ p - ..... mm ''''1 -1D 71 rci)1 CC) 1\) .'„ m 0 , , rnzm — r= z > -I0m 0 (;1) cv r- mo _ m _ n1-11 z s. -I (4 "V > m._ _1 ---1 c-7) m r" cn -- cf) > 0 - --I 111 m 0 > Z r- cr) — Cr) 0 m r" --i JO M 0 0 c.,1.? 0 > m 1 a.....,g m -‹ Z < z C!) 0 rn J ,.... -1 m 0 U) cr) -4 ...., -1 > -1 (i) k) = 0 0 mm 1- mm Z m >33 00 m rn 7,3 -6 CI r- m 2 X m z XI -HG) oz ---4 0 = , m 2 .,7 1 .. z . CD MI „„c2 > C) o , 3 il (CI 0 m CD CD r- — C7 ' .-. 1:k. C C F<c) C) 3' -, R CD co , 0 XI —I si..• ""0 = 0 CD 3 r. MK 1.... -1 %...... =1i - )z. 5K = •-. - 6 0 '" (n —1 —1 cn z •• ) • Z 0 CO Ill 0 z > m m -n 0 0 5 > 1 st-ii 0:1 —1 =1 -20 ao )> o zi ...1 —I K ... mr-, am mDZ) , IV) I 1 1-•"" s a INN= , Pulls -▪ n 71 —•• K cf) 0 = 0 m X OO 0 W rT-1 6 72- %a rn r- ci) 0 %-• z 23 ).. . . ,, ,......13 m ''''1 -13 2 m-no o mco zooc) ...% 0 , —4 X m am -• .• )2. * m '0 T„ r cn — w 0 — —4 m m > r;1 m ED * 0 co 0 m ° 33 3 3 m 4'', > M --.4 m 0 CI) --1 > 0 = M -a o2 yi. -‹ 7--i ▪ ril X '< ni m , m 2 N .., . . E 8 A >z C7 cD a (1) t0 `° Mk CD Fri m = > zc ca 0 -1 0 - -< ca MI r m � Piz � O •��►, .,. CD mm � � . 3 > :,; c) C!) _Hz 1 Cn o' - Z 2 cn z 0 mz C7 zm 1-- I '` 0 - m0 ,4 P f `0 -4 0 cO m• m —1 c) 0- 3.` --1 O z =- O 8 z Q co 01 ® y m m w c_ -n r- C] 111 -I > -4 fill -Im C Orm m Z C7 � J p m O C > mo > m Do w O 33 "7r1 O c 0 0 W mrn xi DJ D 9 y, —1 O -:0rn r- -r1 1 ® - - m CD CJ) K ZO r7-1 -1 .. X71 00 0W =rrn c� '° r fo , za' > 171 rP Cc) © z MIMI. 0 O co z o J3d 0 v ^1 O „ CA � O- , m O , zrnzm -0 -�C O _ ,.. > * m ® �7 0 xI w rte- `--1 �001 0 -I CD -0 > m -,1 --11 w > - 1- 0P41 p cn -._,I -- > © 33 > m O � v O t71 �. 2 J" m9.<0 1 � i,. _-( L:a Z cz V) G) (75 m --1 0m 0 O m = `1^^ r m Z JJa 3> 0z r' � , co -.Yt = m y -t � m = = p ,;n 0 0 m • 0 > 33 G) mz z . 8 A 3- 0 CD 3 a D •• m -0 0 "J Co � 0 sm ✓ s'' z c (O -I 'D - 0x. .� at -, r-!■ rte-- m m r -4 O 0 m m M =� Q m "` w.,,,,, 3-moi --� u � as Z Omom' 2z Cn m ■ r mC7 ' ®17▪ 1 O m rmYt w Wim, -n Y- 0 M -{ > _H r-m C > m j 0 5 Da K n n Z -n Z _i O CD -1 x C -I Q "^-� C Me >0. - m 1> o o 'mol , c 0 co ma MOM TI ; rC ocr, Z c m tt8 rn o � ow = `?. O r o, o Oz - > .� m i , caaz -n 71 n E moo C? .t.mollz o o w --9 nri O 2 t/? o 8_.. - m m © m CI O D C rm -HO— )> 0m- m -1 cI mu' flm -+ com -o m :>. 0 � 0 ; `` to m �1:t, Z 1-- .K.:_,, m '-- 33 m a r m �� .` Z < z Cn 0 vs -1 m � � cn --I rr mm o , > Z 0.1 23 El- 0 > "< ' a' 0 < --I m DJ• mX mm m -4 0m "1 co 0 r- m O MC110 3 ?7K y XI © ) z x m 2 8A 3 lit La -‹ r- CD CD r- r-- Cl, co CD -.< 0 Ffi (D 0 Z -o 0 oD Do =I tv OD0) -<‘gggg 0 = r-. > -2 c co r,,C-- 5MO i 0 z .11.11 M ---1 O > --4 ,,:e "r/ M 0 M 0 .< = r- ...,m r- ---4 o > — c„ m m -4 ....,,..0 0 r n ,..... z 0 m z 0 (.12 r? 0 F.--- Z - et -0 —1 c P 0 c, —I cf) 0 m = rn o z 33 --, o CD zm 171 (33g)1 s ) > C -n r- 0 rn -I > t 0 "1:7 -1 ........ Z cn xi 0 0 CA) 0:3 0 >. ar"" ,.. i .74 m M A CZ fit C z m z - 2 0 c > m PI; It. SI (1) -I 0 =I ....4 -1 0 --• a. , "tg Weft ...."nf1? 0 ca rTi cn 1/4" › ci . z , a 11111111111111111 r. M r 0 3 6 17n3 ,.,, n) w or. - ,.. cn z 7- , - 0 . ", 6 mmi m eftt > c.n '.; • 7-.5. 0 r" Cf) 0 `•-• Z C11 > M IT-1Z MC:igZ -',,,, ......•70 emu a 71 m C 13 73 1::1 0 .-1 -0 0 m 03 Z 0 0 -ri pp -1-1 "'-`'I —1 08 1:.. oca3 m 0 , ,. mzm z c m0 > -< c ›, * m Dot,-) 5-5 — F- z > -.40m 0 (1) r- --s I rn 73 I ii Z -1 CD "12 > LT1 --i _ c/) r"' (i) ••"" 0) > , 0 - -1 mm 0 > 120 rn7:1 700 Z CI) ca C-1) 0 1;713 r- --I ---,,, M 0 §,,... 0 (./) 3 , I3 r— ,-,"- Xi '. 03 * Xi rn ‘....., imps Dj CO ....... A m "g rn < t/ --1 m G) cn &)- --1 C.) = G) CI rr 1 x r"- ril M z m -a — r.- * F.: 33 o > < r* c < --I '''‹ ill X: 11 Zrip M M X --i 0 M C.7) 0 r- m — > II 0 2 --1 0 = m 2 „fr.,/ . z . 8 A ):.., ft 0 0 3 Wit' (D CD '- m rD w . z c t ,4 ► C7 �' O z 7..... --i 0 > CD m r = r- --I- 0 :T Xs, m c 74 --=1- t .3 cn —i -i �, sy ` ?` 0 z va z �m z C7 z m M vi O —# P z }$'13m r-- m z a ra r , Do cT = 0- W n m O w o, -4. 0 zm m ccs D m --I0 m - > { 1 -q -1 Zcn 33 O0m oo0b =irn > 6- m I z --n Z O r9 ° � + oa © o 0? oq03 CA rn iin D73z a IMMO ['- Dom — m 3 at 00o -o O . zz CCG.) , :� wrcn5 � zO > m rn. Qzp r. - - ' c mC © o Com) OW � � --I 0c7 Ci) o8 . a -° 0 3> pct 0 aK 0 a ‹ CO r- .---4x7 mKto r. s' 1 I m mz _ � D GO x::,,x::,, m 3 m 3 > Urn m m al mZ < Z i C? rnG 0 rnz t"' m Z j3 > M -o3> 0 r'" F. - '< 'i [37 I3 C ® -I Sm -‹ m m rn ?0.7 1 2 S m z ' ) 0 > Oy 33 C7 0 �z m 2 0) CD3: 88 A z 0 3 CO 1- rCD `° CD -n 07! MI 0 COM ''c C a ^1 9?.r- ) z c - 03 r. -4n a mP.Or CD rte- J r. -Io .4w w -I0 M cno -# r- r -® --+ c o i r-- m Z 0 v \ ie. s I l' m o z G' x▪ - -I o -o -1 ^ z co. = q�, oo C.40:30 > � m M > L7m -I 0 0. ! C= 0 M -I -im 2 m nm o mI Q o , 5 -I o o m a 33 Cl) I 7 O) dpz `/' aao m � a .... r- Dam DJ, 3 n r- Z CD C �,7 q Cl) -I cn 23 rn --1 .w . I rr'n O � Dmc.) V 01 . r" too ° Za7 > m tri.-1 z �i 0 5 z N. �. 71 Oc M gym") o Om . l`. Om4 -4 a � moa' D p y -< c y, : m Dot7 � to r � 33 cn a m {� © > h > r" DJ Zr t/) c� � TO 'i M o Q 0 't7 bm m .m CO CO Z < z 0/ G.) C7) r mr o II > Ill d Z r <„rP :i © = m -< � m -41 S = 0 X m m 1 M C7) C) rr-- m > x , 5 - z in 33 " a)C n 8 A 3 -e b m CD v '= > z c (Ct -+ > CD 0 CD 0 oam E -_+ Q = 0 zz 0 orl 0 2 i--rgi --::..). 0 M cr, p —4 P z a - corri nn X z c t , w m !1'I c w Itcf -r1 r- c m --I > 1 33 -00 LI W cap > r4 16.. L.: op -_-{ m Md7m m co m- p m 5' -4 Op soda U) o S3? r 03 Darn XjMOM Qm � 3 ink Mi"- ""C rcr 'n0 --i cn 7D m It �� -S.3.0. « mil m O z 1 �o 05 Naomi x m �'u f772 - = CD frT! m m ® 0 > V a a )® 0 m rr- z V) p � ...,t2) C) m0 ® rnz r - mm Z1) > b-or *�— oj r c -4 sm r aD m mm -+ �n t7 rr- m rn z 3:, 33 > 33 o0 c rn 8 A BCC Meeting : February 28, 2017 Agenda Item #8A - Petition: VA-PL20160001 181 Located at: 324 Trade Winds Ave. Presentation by : Mark Shapiro SQ Collier County Planning Commission Transcript January 19, 2017 8 A TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples,Florida,January 19,2017 LET IT BE REMEMBERED,that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building"F"of the Government Complex,East Naples,Florida,with the folio ', r members present: CHAIRIN: Mark Strain Stan Chrzanowski Mane Ebert ', n Homiak J`tnitt Pat `Jrborn ALSO PRESENT: vfy%moi' Mike Bosi,Planning and Zoning Manager~`.o<, Fred Reischl,Principal Planner Jeffrey A.Klatzkow,County;Attorney Heidi Ashton-Cicko,Atttaging Assistant County Attorney Tom .R , School 'ct Representath e aiMp,av "41P xi" A04 /4%/4411:0,0*�• fEl. / >Avw 2 Aka '004* Agar VeMiNtr Page 1 of 46 8 A January 19,2017 PROCEEDINGS MR.BOSI: Chair? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning,everyone.Welcome to the Thursday,January 19th meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. If everybody will please rise for Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Roll call by our secretary,please. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Yes. Good morning. Mr.Eastman? MR.EASTMAN: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Mr.Chrzanowski? ii' COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Ms.Ebert is here. Mr. Strain? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Ms.Homiak? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Here. 740( COMMISSIONER EBERT: Mr. Schmitt? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Present. COMMISSIONER EBERT: And,Mr. Dearborn`' COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. And we have two as ertised public hearings today. The first one is going to be a variance on a property at 342 Tradewinds Avenue and the second one is a review of our Collier County Land Development Code amendments. It will be the second or third reading on some of these for the Planning Commission. It will not be the final. There will be another review. We'll have maybe our final on the 30th in the evening. And with that,we'll move into the Planning Commission absences. We have two upcoming meetings: 5:05 January l h is the LDC review that I just mentioned. Does anybody know if they're not going to make it on January 30th in the evening in this r rn? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And the next regular meeting is February 2nd. Same time,same place,the same place as today. Everybody? Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHM1'1"1 That one,Mark,I may miss that one,but I'm not sure. What's the agenda look like for that one? MR.BOSI: I believe there's only one item on for the 2nd. CHAIRMAN STRAIN; Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT I'll let you guys know,and then you can let the rest of the commissioners know if, in fact,I'm going to be missing from that one. It could go up go in the air. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But I'll know by that night. I'll be here for that Monday meeting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well,we'll still have a quorum,so we're good. Thank you. That takes us to approval of minutes. There have been none electronically provided,so we'll skip that. We'll go to the BCC report and recaps. And Ray's not here,but,Mike,you can go ahead. MR.BOSI: Thank you,Chair. Mike Bosi,Planning and Zoning Director. At the hearing on the 10th,the Collier County Resource Recovery Business Park IPUD was approved unanimously. The Naples Heritage PUD amendment to add the 5-acre tennis facility was defeated by a 3-2 vote,and further clarification was provided to staff for the specifics of a moratorium that was going--that is being considered for the East Trail related to self-storage facilities,car washes,pawnshops, and-- Page 2 of 46 A January 19, 2017 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Gas station. MR.BOSI: --gas stations. Thank you. And so with the further direction,we are bringing back an ordinance on the 14th of February for the Board to consider whether they want to take final action upon that moratorium. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you,Mike. That brings us to the chairman's report,and I have just one thing. Good morning,Nora Frances.I hope you're watching today. She's a friend of the Planning Commission's. Happens to be related to Stan. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Only by marriage. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The consent agenda,we have none, so we'll move directly into our advertised public hearings. ***The first one up is Item 9A. It's VA-PL20160001181,and it's a^ C .ce request for a property located at 342 Tradewinds Avenue. All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item,please rise to swrn.in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirm#0 t� CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. We'll start with dupes on thelaiing Commission from Tom. MR.EASTMAN: None. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Stan? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Strangely,none. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Diane? COMMISSIONER EBERT: I talked with Fred yesterday,and emails and correspondence with a neighbor. F CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You've had correspondence with a`neigor,or they just sent you an email? COMMISSIONER EBERT: Well,yeah,they justsent me. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. That's all. I just wanted to make sure. We've all got an email or two on this,and so I think mine are probably similar to everybody else's. I did talk with the applicant when this first came to my other office,and she came in and asked for some clarification of the process. We went over that,and I think we've talked once since then. And I also talked to Mr.Patrick--Pat Neale who represents some residents who are not in favor of this application. And then,of course, staff. Diane? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Karen. Cx STRAIN: Karen,I'm sorry. Diane's over here. TSSI &f,HOMIAK. clothing. Just the additional email yesterday. 1-4 AIRMAN v� ��1 Joe?'Amt, ` gal SSIONE' 1 L • STRAINS at? CO IONER D". > B ORN: None. C I' FA:‘: ST' • l.: ' ay. With that,we'll move right into the presentation by the applicant to start out. 1 MR. SHAP 1� ° arc Shapiro representing the applicant. CHAIRMAN 1 : If you have items that you want to use the overhead for--I don't think you've appeared before us before--that stand over there has a lot more electronic availability for things to show. You might want to use that. MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah,there may be some-- CHAIRMAN S[RAIN: And also,our mikes don't pick up unless you're really close to them. And we have a walk-around mike over there if you need to get closer to something else that you're trying to show. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll need you to identify yourself and spell your last name for the record, and we'll be good. MR. SHAPIRO: My name is Marc Shapiro. Marc's spelled M-a-r-c; Shapiro, S-h-a-p-i-r-o. Page 3 of 46 January 19,2017 8A CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MR. SHAPIRO: And I'm representing the petitioners in this case for 342 Tradewinds Avenue. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Everything,by the way,that you show on overhead will have to be--copies of it will have to be left with the court reporter for the record. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. They're mainly going to be photographs. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's great. Thank you. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. So there was a variance petition that was filed by the builder in this case, Jason Jenks,and then there was a deficiency letter that was issued,and then my office prepared an amended variance,and that variance was actually recommended for approval. And so that was recommended for approval by,I guess,the Growth Management Department. But I want to read a couple things actually from their words. And,you know,it's important to point out,there's three basic things is--one is the variance we're asking for is a very small variance. So it's--and there's a new code that was brought in this area. So this particular property,you couldn't even tell that it doesn't comply with the current variance because there are several houses that ark exactly in line. In fact, it doesn't look out of place at all,and you wouldn't know. And,in fact,that comes to my first point is that when rth ermit was applied for it was applied for using the setbacks that are currently for the pool rightnow setbacks were approved: There was many inspections that were done to the property. In each cases du tg each inspection,it was approved. Nobody even caught that it didn't meet the current code until one ; neighb4 cess,came and pointed out to the county that it didn't comply with the current code,and iwas at tile that my client was informed they had to do a petition for a variance. So my client,who hired the builder,had no idea that it didn't comply with code. In fact,if you'd look at it,there's no way you could even tell that t,-:because it doesn't stick out. It's something that's completely in line with the rest of the structures that are on both sides of the street or on the canal there. So--and it says here--this is from the report that was issued from the:Growth Management--the $r, applicant utilized the erroneously approved setbacks unaware of any violations. So when they applied for the pool permit,the county actuaiyprovided the setbacks,and they erroneously provided the setbacks that were the older setbacks that hadn't--rather than the updated ones. So based on those setbacks,my client constructed the pool and poured the slab. And we're talking about approximately two and a half feet. Now,the setbacks,they're about six feet over--instead of a 20-foot setback,they were told they had a 10-foot setback,so they're over the setback,but it's important to note that the height of the pool wall,if it was two-and-a-half feet lower,they could be 10 feet, the setbacks. It's 20-feet setbacks based on the current height. So we're talking two-and-a-half feet. So the two-and-a-half feet does not really affect anyone's view. In fact,we have the neighbor right across the street--in fact,I brought some pictures,which I'll show in a moment,but if anything,the view from thea ieighbor,their lanai actually sticks out further than my client's pool which doesn't have a lanai on it and never.will. Also,if you're looking acres,there's boats parked,and the boats that are parked,which are legally parked m front of the seawall mut higher than my client's pool does. So it's a very,I would say, negligible impact looked down the canal,I had to ask,you know,which one--to my client, which one is your ho a you can't tell by looking at it that it sticks out. It's perfectly in line with all of the rest of the houses:":.. re just talking about two-and-a-half feet up. And a few years ago,when the code was that,you know,that--exactly what they built,so we're not talking about any major impact. Now,it would be a severe economic hardship for my client to have to completely tear down the whole--by the time this was brought to their attention--and,again,it was brought to their attention because, I guess,the neighbor pointed it out to the county--they had already poured the slab. They had already put the whole pool in--where the pool was going to be. That was already in. And they estimate--this is from the builder--and I think it's a very conservative estimate--that to go back and redo this--because they'd have to basically tear out the whole poured concrete pool and start over again--would be,in his words, $50,000. And,again,I think that's a very conservative number. But it would be,at minimum, $50,000 to go back and redo this over essentially two-and-a-half feet. Page 4 of 46 January 19, 2017 8A So I'd like to at this time show some photographs. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Fred will help you with the overhead;that's the gentlemen right there. You'll have to use the mike,either the walk-around mike or the stationary one. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. So if you can see where my finger is,this is the structure in question. And,actually,this view is where--the people that are here opposing this,this would be their view. So there's two views. There's an open-water view,and then there's down the canal. So if you're looking down the canal,you'll see that this structure is really in line with all the other structures and,in fact,one of the people that's objecting to this,his pool enclosure is the same height and the same setback as my client's because,as I said,this is a new,I guess,updated requirement. And when they--when they put in the permit for the pool,they were erroneously giving the older setback requirements. So it's not like this sticks out at all. It just doesn't comply with the latest setback requirements. Here's another--this is a similar view,just a little bit more close up. And this is a view here--you'll see that this structure here is the structure in question. And the neig on actually both sides, if you line up the seawalls,they line up perfectly together. In other words,the sfacks on both'sided,the neighbors on either side,are both exactly the same setbacks as my client's,the petitioner's setback. And,again,it's because these were the former setbacks. So this is the picture of the--you can see the open-water view And,again,the petitioner's structure is right here. So you'll see if you're looking down,the people that are oectin o this,the neighbors that are objecting,they are way down towards this range--Pm sorry. There towards this area here. So they're actually--their view is not obstructed of the open water because the petitioner's structure's down here. And if they look down the canal,I don't see,being on this side of the road,how their view could be remotely affected,and if it was affected,it would be affected by the lanai of the house in front of them,and if it is affected at all,the two-and-a-half feet isn't going to make any difference In fact,as I said,the boat—the boats that are parked in front of the structure actually stick out above the pool enclosure. So if their views are obstructed at all, it's not because of this.In fact--and I think you have this as part of the application,but there's a couple letters. One letter is from an objector who actually canvassed the neighborhood on both sides of the street and tried to get as many people to object as possible, and I think he was successful;in maybe getting one other,possibly two others,to object. My client,I believe,has 43 people. Well,I say 43 because that's how many people live there that either didn't carput it or actually signed a ttion in her favor or a letter in her favor saying that they didn't beh* � ~ use--they believe that the variance should be granted;that her house doesn't obstruct , w, iesn't stick out,doesn't make it look like it's not conforming with the community. tleffits picture here you'll see'tiOnuse right here is the subject house,but the house right before that,th '. nai actually would inhibit the and actually that tree right there would inhibit the view of the objectors that are looking down the canal before my client's pool enclosure would. In fact,from this view, which is--you can't even see the pool. And then,lastly,this picture shows--and I want to point out the house next to it with the lanai. So the objectors would be looking down this way,so they'd actually be seeing that lanai before they would see this pool. So I guess the three points I want to make is that it was not purposefully done. When the builder applied for the permit,they were erroneously given the wrong setbacks;they built the pool using the wrong setbacks;there was four inspections along the way,never once did anyone point out that,oh,this doesn't comply. In fact,it wasn't till the neighbor pointed that out,and that's the reason we're here today. The second point I want to make is that if there's any impact at all on the neighborhood,which I submit there's not because it's perfectly in line with the other houses'setbacks--in fact,if you were to walk that street,you wouldn't even notice that this house was out of conformity. But if there is any impact, it would be very negligible. We're basically talking about two-and-a-half feet. If the seawall were two-and-a-half feet lower,the setback would be correct. Also,if they moved it back approximately,I believe, six feet,then they could have it that height. So we're talking about two-and-a-half Page 5 of 46 . ,� 8 A January 19, 2017 feet,and the economic hardship involved in putting it into compliance would be,at minimum,$50,000. So for those reasons and also the fact that I think if you read the planning board's recommendation, they set things forth very thoroughly on why they would--not the planning board but the--I guess the report from-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's called a staff report. MR. SHAPIRO: --yeah, staff report. They set forth very particularly why they're recommending that the variance be approved. So I would ask that,you know,you all take a look at that,and they lay it out very nicely. And they were also aware of the neighbors that were objecting also when they came to that recommendation. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are you finished,Mr. Shapiro? MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah,I am finished. My understanding is there's someighbors that are right across the way that were also going to testify for the petitioner. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let me tell you what the procedure is,because I don't think you've been here before. After you finish your presentation,the Planning Com-009p wills a*questions if they have any. Then from there we'll go to the staff report. After the staff repof nd staff' verbal recommendations over parts of their report,we ask questions of than. When they Ts.we go to public speakers. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: After public speakers,you'll have an opportunity for a 11 t# r` to rebuttal, and then we go into discussion and decision on our part,or recommendation on our part. So t at will be the process we'll go through. And since you're finished,and before we go to Planning Commission questions, there are a few things I think I'd like you to answer and clear up s .e Planning Commission gets the benefit of those answers before any questions are asked. MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You said the code was exaetlywhat it was when they built this 2.5, two-and-a-half years ago. What did you mean by that? MR. SHAPIRO: Well--and,again,I don't know when the time limit was,but-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Time limit--what do you mean by"time limit"? MR. SHAPIRO When I say two-and-a-half years,I don't know if that's the exact time. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Probably in terms of do ` to a decade or two. This height issue has been in the code very,very early on. The problem is it's very o re in our code to find it,and it only seems to be applicable to Vanderbilt Beach. Specifically our code says Isle of Capri and Marco Island don't have to have this kind of an application. They go to seven feet,which yours then would have been fine if you were on Isles of Capri or Marco Island. Also- MR.SHAPIRO: So I misspoke about the two-and-a-half feet. I just was kind of making that up as an example. ,. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,you can't make things up. We've got to deal with the code in fact. And if you're going to reference something of the code and it also involves the staff error,we've definitely got to weigh in on that and understand it. You had said that the setbacks were erroneously given to your client. Have you got something that says for your client to design to those setbacks? MR. SHAPIRO:.:,Lbelieve there is. The builder is here,and he could probably better answer that than I could. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,that will be helpful. If he's here,then we'll--see,you ought to call him as someone--a witness on your behalf to begin with before we go to the staff report. So if he's here, we're definitely going to--we'll ask questions of him after the Planning Commission gets finished with you. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Those couple things,though,are important as to how this happened,the time frame. The code has not changed. The code is just obscure and hard to read in this particular issue,Pll grant you that. It certainly isn't clear. And as far as the staff goes,yes,a staff member certainly made an error in approving this the way it Page 6 of 46 8 A January 19,2017 came through. But I don't know if that was a result of the staff telling you to do it that way or your design professionals decided to do it that way,and that will be something we'll find out shortly. With those clarifications,and before I get into any more of my questions,I'll turn to the Planning Commission for any questions they may have to start with. Anybody? Stan? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Just,those shots you took,those were taken with a drone,I assume? MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I'm glad you did that. It showed it very well. I looked at Google Earth 3D. And from what I could tell on Google Earth 3D,I couldn't see where there was a tremendous difference from this to the other,the older to the new,but those shots showed it pretty good. I was going to ask--you probably don't know.I guess a lot of my other questions are going to be to staff. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else? Joe? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I have several questions regarding the process,but I'm going to defer and wait to talk to Mr.Reischl,because I need to--but the question I do have for you,Marc,did you--or do you have in your documents--typically when you go in for a building permit,the first thing they do is lay out the site plan,and then on that site plan,the reviewer in the Building Department,is my recollection,would initial off each of the setback requirements and put their initials on--actually right on the document. Do you--is that the procedure now? And I'm going back six;seven years back in--but typically they would--you'd go in,on the building--the building envelope that is allowable for a building would be shown on the site drawing of the--and then all of the setbacks would be checked off to ensure that the setbacks are in compliance. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The permits for this project w on my desk. I pulled them yesterday afternoon.That document is there. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Is there CHAIRMAN STRAIN: There's been four permits: One demo,one pool,the main permit for the house,and the dock permit that was reissued,because it was started,then stopped,and then reissued again. And there's some discrepaties between the permits,but the setbacks and everything were acknowledged by staff as being okay and issued that way. And I've actually got the building permit with me. I didn't know how much the applicant would have brought in case there were questions,but the permit itself was issued at 10 feet. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You don't have that document that shows the setbacks being approved? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's in the file that's on my desk. I did not bring it with me to the meeting. I assumed the applicant would have brought all of that,but-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm surprised that that's not part of the application or the applicant would have had that to present to us today. My second question ,and I'm going to defer to Fred because I want to clearly understand the--again,Pve got the MUNI code here. I'm trying to read the MUNI code,because I looked at this before. But in this part I recall nine, 10 years ago,that's what drove the change in the code,if you went up a certain height,and I seem to think it was four feet;is that correct? MR. SHAPIRO: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You go four feet,you have to have a 20-foot setback. If your pool height is less than 4 feet,you only need a 10-foot setback; is that essentially the-- MR. SHAPIRO: That's exactly correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,we can--I'll give Fred the code. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah,let's review that,because I want to make sure that--and I had thought at one time that actually in the LDC there was a diagram that showed that. I guess that's no longer in Page 7 of 46 January 19, 2017 8 A the LDC. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No,but a former administrator by the name of Joe Schmitt actually did a diagram a few years back,and it's in the staff clarification section of our notes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I did,yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Fred,if you go here--go to the reference in the table first,and that's--once we get this seen,maybe it will help some of the questions that you-all have. MR. SHAPIRO: But,Mr. Schmitt,my understanding is exactly as you described. And I think their--rather than four feet,they're 6.57. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Fred,that--I'm not sure that's the right one. Those were non-waterfront. Go to the next table. MR.REISCHL: Oh. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You're going to have to pan out a little bit on that,Fred. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,I'll show you--the footnotes are on a separate page. Go to the next table. It's the second or third sheet. And if you look down where it says No. 4--you have to pan out a little bit--this is for waterfront lots along the Gulf of--and No. 4 says,swimming pools and screen enclosure single-family,one-family,and now two-family;rear, 10 feet,and then the little Footnote 3. Now,Footnote 3 is the catchall on this. If you could show Footnote 3,Fred,down the third page,I think. MR.REISCHL: Very small. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah,it says 20 feet where swimming pool decks exceed four feet in height above the top of seawall or top of bank except Marco Island and Isle of Capri,which may construct to a maximum of seven feet above the seawall with a maximum of four feet of stem wall exposure with a rear setback of 10 feet. • •: 4, So--and Marco,by the way,is no longer part of Collier County. So I pulled Marco's LDC,and they have mimicked this language in their current standards. So the seven foot applies to Marco and Isles of Capri,but only four foot of concrete exposure,which means it's got to be clad or a buffer with vegetation or sodded. MR.REISCHL: Sodded. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any way you'd like. But if they're at less than 20 feet,they can't go higher. It's got to be four feet so that a variance is not for the setback as much as it is for the height to be at that setback. I hope that helped clarify because this was not an easy one to follow for that language. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Whit—and so the current height as shown,is that correct what we have-- MR. SHAPIRO: I think the county measured at 6.57. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. COMMISSIONS.SCHMI 11: Okay. That's the current height,then. Okay. I thought it was four-point something. Okay. 6.57. All right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All right. Anybody else have any questions of the applicant? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Marc,you stated that there were four inspections. Those inspections were not specifically looking for setbacks. There are several inspections throughout the building process. MR. SHAPIRS ,Co ct. And we're not specifically looking for setbacks,that is correct. COMMISSIOI`1CHMITT: And I want to make sure that's clear on the record,because if an inspector goes out and does an electrical,he or she's doing electrical inspections,not a setback-- MR. SHAPIRO: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: --verification. MR. SHAPIRO: And I'm talking about--and the builder could better explain this,because I'm getting my information from the builder and relaying it to you. But I think there are four inspections on the pool. So at no time was it ever said during any of those inspections that,hey,your setbacks aren't correct. I guess the point is is that now that it's already there,it would be a very--economic hardship to take it all down. It would come at a considerable cost is,I guess,what I'm trying to say. Page 8 of 46 ■ 8 A January 19,2017 And,you know,maybe--and this is up to you.But you were saying that the Marco Island code said you could have a certain height as long as there was a buffer there,and maybe that's a compromise,to put a little hedge in front of the stem wall. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Generally what happens is when we run into these situations,the applicant will come prepared with the documentation to basically make their case in regards to how this occurred. And I know you don't--you haven't got any permit applications or anything with you,do you? MR. SHAPIRO: I don't have the permit applications with me,no. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I have reviewed them,and I didn't bring them because they're our county's copies,but I didn't know you wouldn't be bringing them as well;otherwise,I would have brought them to help clarify some of the things you've asked,Joe. Some of the things you've said I wanted to get some clarification on. You said there were 43 people who didn't call or sign--or necessarily sign in favor. Did someone--and that was an assumption they weren't objecting to it then? MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Did you physically or did your clie or do you have something documented that says you actually went to these 43 homes and spoke to those people? Do you have a survey or something where you-- xrr MR. SHAPIRO: No. What I do have--and I*Ought you already had that,but I;have a--I actually have a copy of a letter that was signed by--and then theta's atures,and then next to it is theresidence that they live at. �� MR.REISCHL: That's included in your packet. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. H** y people are Atifitsignature page? MR. SHAPIRO: Eight. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. His number was 43,and I'm triftito understand-- MR. SHAPIRO: The 43 -- y CHAIRMAN STRAIN;. how valid that is. MR. SHAPIRO: pause I think that's the nu l i f re $;ff ' on both sides of the street.And what I was told by my client is that the objector that's here today pretty much knocked on everybody's door. CHAIRMAN RAIN: Okay. You have a couple times mentioned the view down the canal,and at the end of the canal w 't obstructed any more by what your client has built versus what may already exist there. The view corridors that we consider for these kind of things usually are in line with riparian lines. And that may be an4nue that yob may want to look at in reference to view in the future. But down the canal and out the end Isn't really something that's considered as directly behind their home. They have riparian rights on both sides of their house,property lines,and that's generally what we take a look at in these kind of matters. MR. SHAPIRO: If I could showyou an answer(sic)that might help answer that question. So these little yellow tabs,and I'm not how sure-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh,we can see them. MR. SHAPIRO: You can see them. But those are the people that I believe that are objecting to the variance. And that was taken by Google Earth,so at the time the structure was not up so,unfortunately,I don't have a picture wt4 cture up,but this vacant lot right here is where the structure was built. So heading this`' that is the open water view heading-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: You have a vacant lot? It's not the one with the trees. It's the one two off--yeah,right under the W of Tradewinds. MR. SHAPIRO: Oh,yes,you're correct.That's--yeah. So that's the house in question,and then this is the location of the people that are objecting. So I guess what I'm saying is,it's hard to see how their view would be affected. And if it is affected, it would be very minorly. I mean,we're talking about 2.57 feet. And,actually,when you--if you look straight across the canal,the boat sticks up higher than the elevation of the pool. So you actually can't even see the pool wall because of the boat that's in front of it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. A couple other issues. You mentioned,or I thought you stated,that Page 9 of 46 ..rrri■�r.rr (A(] A \/ A January 19, 2017 if this pool was moved back six feet,you could have had it at the height they're at. That's not true. To stay at that height you'd have to be 20 feet back,and you're only 10.15 feet back.Then if you take into consideration your stairwell,you're only 6.5 feet back. So you'd have to be considerably further back. The issue of being forward or backward is not as much of an issue as the height of the deck of the pool. That's the six feet that we're trying to--six-and-a-half feet or so we're trying to deal with. The property is perfectly in line with others.When you made that statement,do you know if the others are above four feet since they're in line with an alignment that could only be allowed if they were at or below four feet? MR. SHAPIRO: Some are and some aren't. Some are below four feet. There are some that are above that--again,probably more than 10 years old when the--before the code changed. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,the code is actually older than that. But if there are some above that height and they're in that alignment,it would have certainly been helpful to possibly have looked up those building permits and see what height they're at and maybe would help your argument. But I didn't know if you had that information. I'm double-checking to make sure I don't have any other questions. Oh,I noticed in your photos you didn't show the existing construction with the stairwell. The stairwell is part of the setbiek alignment. Did you have one with the stairwell? MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. I'll show you a couple. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: There you go. MR. SHAPIRO: That would be the stairwell right there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So the variance request for the setback is because the stairwell exceeds the allowed protrusion if it was at four feet for the pool deck,for example,to go into a setback. Stairwells do have some allowance to--when you go into a setback,but I believe it's only three feet,and this one's three-and-a-half feet? MR.REISCHL: Three feet is the allowable protrusion,and this one is three-and-a-half. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So if this one had six inches less of the protrusion of the stairwell and the setback was allowed at 10 feet,the stair wouldn't be an issue. SO'I wanted to point that out because it is part of the discussion today,and I noticed the closeup photograph you had didn't show the angle from the stairwell. And,by the way,I don't know if staff caught thw f at stair is facing a different direction than the stair that was approved on the building permit And if theulder's here,maybe he can answer that question, too. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Can you bahat out a little bit so I can get a full picture of the-- MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. I actually have another one that has a more full view. If you'd like to look at that,that may be better. COMMISSIONER SCI-IMITT `.::just for clarification,it was my understanding that the need to build the pool height at the elevation that was built at. Two--one is to meet the base flood elevation for the home,and most residents want to walk out from their residence onto the pool deck rather than walk down the stairs to the pool Could the pool have been built--could it have been designed and built at a lower height than what it was built at? Which would have left the house and walked downstairs to another elevation,a lower elevation for the .'e'8 MR. SHAPIRO: So the answer to your question is,I believe so. Now,the builder could better answer that. So it's not whether it could have,because I believe that it could have. I mean,it could have been built at a 4-foot instead of a 6--instead of a 6.57-foot. But the issue is now it's been done,and to kind of un-ring that bell comes at a significant cost. So I don't think it's a matter of could it have been in compliance. I think that if we were to honestly answer that,yes,it could have been built in compliance,but since it hasn't,it's just what is the cost of bringing it into compliance.And I think that's a pretty heavy cost compared to the impact. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Understand. Fred,can you put that other picture up that shows the overhead? I wanted to--again,that's--can Page 10 of 46 8A January 19, 2017 you center the house actually into the picture. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Zoom out a little. MR.REISCHL: Zoom out. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. There. I want to get a picture of the whole thing. Okay. Yeah. That's exactly what I thought. You're coming out from the house onto basically a lanai deck, and then the pool is at the same height. MR.REISCHL: It's just a few inches. The house is--the base flood elevation was 10,and it's nine-point something. It's a little--a few inches less. So you'd step one step down onto the pool deck. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anything else? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Could you ask your builder,if he's here, if the builder could come up. We do have questions since we understand he's here. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Is that the builder or the person who designed the house as well? MR. SHAPIRO: Both. I think both. MR.JENKS: I didn't design the house. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You'll need to say that on the record after you identify yourself. MR.JENKS: Jason Jenks. I was the contractor who built the house. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And you did not design the house,was sur response to that? MR.JENKS: I did not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Was that the question? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah,that was the question. I wanted to-- COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Did you sub out the work for the pool,or were you actually building the pool as well? MR.JENKS: We subbed out the work for the pool. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: The company who's doing the pool? MR.JENKS: Mack Pools. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Mack Pools,okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The information about how this 10-foot,at the height that this deck came about,your--the attorney had indicated that the staff provided you and told you to build it,to design it to that distance; is that true? MR.JENKS: The staff. CIRMAN STRAIN: County staff? M :JENKS: Well,the pool was built by the time we submitted for the variance. So we submitted a set of plans,they were approved,and we started to build. Of course,first thing we built was the pool because of the Iox :, CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Who--when the pool was put down on a set of plans,did you do that,or did you have an architect do that or somebody else? MR.JENKS:•A designer did it. I didn't do it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Where did the designer get his information from to determine the setback for that pool? MR.JENKS: I think he made some calls to the county. I don't have that information. I don't work with the designer. He's somebody that designs houses. I was sent the plans. I sent them to an engineer. I have an engineer. I submitted it for a building permit. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. You do--that's what most GCs would do,so I'm not surprised at that.I'm trying to find out--actually,in your--not your defense,but your client's defense,on how this error occurred. It appears--up until your attorney made the statement he made,it appeared that the applicant,which is your designer or your client,drew the plans up and submitted them to the county,the county reviewed them,and the county erroneously approved them without notifying the client that there was an error in the setback. Page 11 of 46 January 19,2017 8 A I think the error probably was on the plan. I think the error's on both part of the applicant as well as the part of county for not catching it.And the county missed it numerous times. I've got the plans. It wasn't vague. It was clear. It was clear where it was. Your structural drawings show how that stair was also--the width of the stair was clear. I mean,anybody that reads plans would have been able to figure this out. I can't-- I certainly can't say the staff is not to blame in part of this. They certainly are. And I think the issue is that whoever set this up in the site plan trying to determine what the initial setbacks were either went to the wrong table or missed the footnote on the second table,kind of as we started out here today. There's two tables,and one is for waterfront,one is for non-waterfront. But one has a little Subscript 3,and the other doesn't. And if you're from another part of the county,you wouldn't be surprised at six-and-a-half feet x:height because I bet you could go up to seven. So there's a lot of little things that came into play on this one. It's certainly understandable that some errors were made. I just think we need to find a solution today. In regards to how you were going to finish off this concrete wall now that's there,has anybody looked at opportunities to,say,take away/distract from that wall by cladding it,by putting in shrubbery,by doing embankments or anything like that? MR.JENKS: Those were all options,and it would definitely be some landscaping on the backside of it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So you-all haven't brought anything,though,to propose today? MR.JENKS: We did not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. The height of the seawall. You were the GC;the pool contractor was subbed to you. Orick Marine,I believe .the deck. Was he contracted through you or directly to the owner? MR.JENKS: Through the owner CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Did you work with him at all in coordinatinthings? MR.JENKS: I did not;not the seawall. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Do you know--is he'fiere today;does anybody know? MR.JENKS: He's not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. He certified the seawall to be done according to the plans. I see--I found the certification. TAplans call for a 4.2 deck height,top height on the seawall cap. The plans that all this variance request is frci*, a,3.2 height. f just am now--that's a 1-foot difference. It's significant when you look at the difference yoU ave in what you're trying to seek as a solution to your whole operation. And I'm just wondering;does anybody know if that seawall is actually elevated to the 4.2 that the certification seems to insi ate? MR.JENKS: It should show it on the survey that we turned in. P • STRAIN: Well, it does. It shows 3.2,but I've got a building plan that says it will be capped a } r;' I have a certification from the installer that says that's right. So I'm confused by the height of the cap. MRS I don't know the answer to that. CHAIRMl PS[' .l i Okay. The stair. Did you submit a change to the plans to have the stair turned in that directs. a ,f bt here? f MR.JENKS: ' did not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I mean,it's a minor issue. It's still the same distance out,but I just happened to notice it was twisted in a different way. MR.JENKS: It was just easier access to the dock. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,actually,it's better for the neighbors,too. It actually makes people using the stairs going in and out a different direction. So from that perspective,it doesn't harm anything. I was just curious if it got cleared through another permit application. That may have had some indication to the setbacks;may have looked at them again. That's all. COMMISSIONER EBERT: I have a question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead. Page 12 of 46 January 19, 2017 8A COMMISSIONER EBERT: Have you built in Collier County before? MR.JENKS: This was the first house I ever submitted for for a full construction. We've done lot of remodels and additions in Collier County. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. So you,as a contractor,are familiar with our codes then? MR.JENKS: Yes. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. MR.JENKS: But not the code that has the height on the seawall. This wasn't done intentionally. COMMISSIONER EBERT: No,we all kind of understand that,but-- MR.JENKS: Right. COMMISSIONER EBERT: --one other thing. I'm reading through this,is that a lot of this was found last October. Is there a CO on this property yet? MR.JENKS: There is not. COMMISSIONER EBERT: So the people have not moved into the home? MR.JENKS: They have not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This started with a complaint that started with Contractor Licensing,and I think in April of 2016,then it was followed up with a slab survey in May of 2016. I think that's when everything was kind of unfolded from that point forward. But it wasn't necessarily Code Enforcement initiated,as some of this information shows. It was Contractor Licensingthat initiated it,the call. It came into Contractor Licensing from a neighbor across the way,apparently. COMMISSIONER EBERT: So it does go back quite a ways then? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,April of last year;a little bit less than a year ago. They've been trying to work and get it resolved since then. It started with my office,and then it had to get continued to here. MR.JENKS: We've continued to work on the house,but we haven't touched anything on the pool or the pool deck since we were notified of the issue. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. So the pool deck is-- MR.JENKS: It's exactly like it was when we were told it was not in compliance. COMMISSIONER EEERT: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else have any questions of the gentleman? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. On that picture shown that you have on the visualizer,the deck that is--and this a eral question that probably the applicant,anybody,can answer. But the deck height that is in the house on the bottom of the picture, is that boat deck higher in elevation than the existing deck that was built? MR.JENKS: The deck we constructed is higher than that deck. COMMISSIONER SCHlt r Jt is? Because this one--that deck to the south appears to go over the seawall,and it's all one structure atittiffway up to the pool. I'm looking at,is that--was that the intent for this existing x {'- 1\444,,,NKS: It looks like their doc`c comes over the-- COIISSIONER SCHMITT: That's it,the dock. MR.JENKS: -- ground is what it is,and they just built the dock and went all the way back to that seawall or to their pool retaining wall. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MR. SHAPIRO: Mr. Strain,I just wanted to clarify one thing. When I made the comment that--I guess,that the permitting erroneously gave them the wrong setbacks,so I personally have no idea.I actually read that from the staff report,so that's where I got that information from. That's what they state in their staff report. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other witnesses that you want to call,or you done with your Page 13 of 46 January 19, 2017 8A presentation? MR. SHAPIRO: We are done with the presentation. There--as you said,the only other people would be neighbors,but I believe they go later. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: They'll be coming up later,yes. Okay. Thank you very much,both of you.Appreciate it. Fred,do you have a staff report? MR.REISCHL: Thank you,Mr.Chairman. Fred Reischl with Planning and Zoning. You've read the staff report,and staff is recommending approval with the condition. You know normally that variances run with the land. In this case,we're recommending that if there--if the structure is destroyed more than 50 percent of assessed value,that it would have to meet current setbacks. So we're modifying it so--because this is based on a financial hardship,we figure that financial hardship would go away if the house was destroyed;therefore,they'd have to meet current setbacks. It would not run with the land. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Are there any questions of the staff? I think,Joe,you had one earlier. Did you still? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No. 111 just hold off until we have general discussion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Fred,on the oltan? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: When we have that general discussion,are we going to be allowed to ask them questions? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. We won't close the public hearing until that's over. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: As far as your understanding of how this originated,do you know if,in fact, staff,at the period in which an applicant may have asked for design features of this location,this lot,was given--was the applicant given information to say he could use a 10-foot setback,or is that just something that seems to be not verified? MR.REISCHL: I don't kn©w the answer to that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. At this point the only thing I can find is it was submitted erroneously,then reviewed erroneously,and then a permit was issued erroneously. That's the best I can-- MR.REISCHL: That was my understanding,too,but I don't know for sure if someone directed them to do it at 10 or not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER EBERT: I have a question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead,Diane. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Fred,you said this is a financial hardship. I would not blame the owners of this home on this at all,but the--being it is--that the pool was stopped so long ago and nothing has been done,I would think that it would be their responsibility and not the owner's responsibility as far as financial; is that correct? MR.REISCHL: That's a legal question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was going to say... COMMISSIONER EBERT: Well,I mean,we always use money,you know,in this stuff. And I was just--like I say,I don't feel that it should be up to the owner. But were these people--were they told you can proceed at your own risk? MR.REISCHL: That's our standard answer is that,yes,you can proceed at your own risk pending the outcome of the--in this case was the Hearing Examiner and now the Board of County Commissioners. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. When were they told that they could proceed at their own risk? How far back? Was this April/May when all this happened? MR.REISCHL: The Building Department would have done that. I don't know. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I want to clarify. I mean,that's-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was going to go there,too. Go ahead,Joe. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I think it's sort of disingenuous to say they're proceeding at their Page 14 of 46 8A January 19,2017 own risk. It's a procedural process. When you come in and submit for a permit application,the applicant submits,submits the plans and drawings,they're reviewed by staff,and they're approved by staff. So the applicant proceeds based on the understanding that what they submitted meets in compliance with all the requirements. I don't know if that's the proceed-at-risk issue. It is a review and approval. MR.REISCHL: Well,it would be a risk that the variance would be approved versus-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well,wait a minute.No,Pm going back prior to when the house was first submitted. When the application first goes in,the applicant goes in,the plans are reviewed,the setbacks are reviewed,the setbacks are approved,and the applicant hires a builder,and they build a house based on what the county approved. I don't know if there's a case of sovereign immunity. I guess that's an issue from the county.Could the county be held responsible? I'm not going to go down there,but that's not an issue.The issue here is there's a variance,and--I mean,in general terms,I've got to tell you what,my days in the county,this is more post-traumatic stress than my year in Afghanistan,I've got to tell you. I went through several of these in my tenure as the county--or the administrator for Community Development. And it's a case of applications coming in,the amount of applications coming in and the stress to approve--review and approve,and there was an error made,basically. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: They were given a permit that says 10 feet. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: How much of the house was built when this was found? MR.REISCHL: I was not the original planner on this. One of my coworkers was. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: The contractor would probably know that better than you would. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was going to ask the contractor to Come back up. No,you have to come to the microphone,and maybe we've got a couple more questions for you. Before we do,there was something I wanted to mention in line with what you were saying. The reviewer on this,by the way,was a fellow we had hired recently from Marco Island,and it wouldn't surprise me if,based on his knowledge of Marco Island,Marco Island would have allowed this to go to seven feet, that might have also contributed to the error that happened. Sir,if you could answer-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: How much of the house was built when the problem was found? MR.JENKS: The rear retaining wall was in place,the pool shell was in place,the slab was in place, and I think we had just poured the tie beam,and we may have started framing by then. I don't have the exact-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. Because there was a comment you made earlier that you did the pool first. I could understand that,because you couldn't build a pool with the house in the way-- MR.JENKS: Correct COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: --unless you built it from the waterway,which is practically impossible-- MR.JENKS (Correct.' COMMIS`' r' CHRZANOWSKI: --which is one of the problem you're going to have if you have to take it out o {Y • take it out from water side,which is practically impossible. You've got to move the dock,you've go< % move the boat. So I could see,even if you told them that,hey,the pool was in the wrong place,you know,they might as well not stop because there's nothing they can do. The house is already in the way. MR.JENKS: That's true. That's true. We didn't do anything to make it any harder to remove this pool or,you know-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Yeah. But once the house is up to the tie beam,you're not going to get back here to do anything with the pool. MR.JENKS: Correct. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Not easily. MR.JENKS: Not easily. Page 15 of 46 January 19, 2017 8 COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Well,you can do anything you want if you've got enough money. Okay. Thanks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Pve got a question,a follow-up. MR.JENKS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You anchored the pool,not with piling,with tie grade beams is what you--that's the only thing holding the pool down? MR.JENKS: Pilings. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh,you've got piling as well. MR.JENKS: And footers,yeah. It's sitting on pilings. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Now,there was a cost put in the report that said it would be about $50,000 to remove that pool and then,of course,it would have to be redone,then all the debris would have to be removed. I know it's not finished,but I would think the 50,000 is certainly a number that's probably realistic in looking at the condition it's in today just to get that concrete taken out and hauled away, if not more. So to answer--Diane seemed to think you stopped construction and,if you did,maybe your value to replace the pool wouldn't be as great. I think the 50,000 is pr, conservative In cost-wise to clean this up if it had to be. MR.JENKS: It probably is. And it wouldn't--nothing changed back there. You know, if it was--we continued with the house at our own risk. We still have to get all he stuff back around the front of the house,so we didn't change anything of tearing the pool out. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you very much, MR.JENKS: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Did you have anything? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. With that,we will go to--we'll start with registered speakers. As your name is called,please come Io one of the microphones, identify yourself for the record,and if your name is hard to spell,just please 01 it for the court reporter so we dontf get it mixed up. MR.REISCHL: The first speaker.is Edward Tappen followed by George Marks. MR.TAPPEN: My name is Edward Tappen I spell my name T-a-p-p-e-n. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MR.TAPPEN: Was there anything else? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, sir,that's fine. We're off to a good start. MR.TAPPEN: For the last year I've been an advocate for having Collier County establish common municipal golf courses. Collier- CHAIRMAN ST,MIN: This--sir, are you here to talk about the golf course? MR.TAPPEN: Yes,I am. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This is not that one. MR.TAPPEN: Pardon me? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're not talking about that right now. It's coming up in about-- MR.REISCHL: That's the next item. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's the next item. This is about a pool variance, swimming pool variance. MR.TAPPEN: Okay. Sorry. I thought my name was called. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No problem. Save his card for later. MR.REISCHL: There was no item listed on it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No,I'm sorry. It was a mix-up on our part. MR.TAPPEN: Will I be back soon? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I hope so. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: We hope. MR.REISCHL: And I know I called Mr.Marks next,but his attorney,Patrick Neale,requested to go before Mr.Marks. Page 16 of 46 } 8 January 19, 2017 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. MR.REISCHL: Patrick Neale followed by George Marks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And,by the way,for those of you who have not attended our meetings before,speakers are limited to three minutes unless waived. We generally don't enforce that as long as the information you're providing is not redundant and it's not repetitive. So we're here to listen to you. Just be conscious of everybody's time,please. Thank you. MR.NEALE: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Patrick Neale,N-e-a-1-e,for Mr. and Mrs. Marks who are in opposition to this variance. What I'd like to bring the Board's attention to is--the Commission's attention to is more the legal issues that revolve around this. As you're probably aware,there are,you know,eight criteria that are involved in the granting of a variance. A variance is not something that's to be taken lightly. There's a great deal of case law out there on variances,and I'm not about to bore anybody with doing what I have to do all day,which is read case law, so I'm not going to do that. But what I'd like to bring to the Board's attention is a case called Indialantic versus Nance,which really sets out the primary issues as to a zoning variance. And the prerequisite to a granting of the variance is the presence of an exceptionally unique hardship to the mdtal`landowner,unique to that parcel and not shared by other property owners in the area. There's nothing unique about this situation for the landowner. The landowner simply went in,had a design professional who did not know what they were doing frankly. They came in and submitted a plan that was in error based on the evidence of record at this point,and then proceeded to build based on that. Now,yes,they did rely on the county's assertions,but in my experience in dealing with county permits--and I've been here for a while--typically the permit says that it's the responsibility of the landowner and their design professionals to meet the code. It's not the responsibility of the county to make sure the design professionals did their jobs properly. y .: So we'll go through--and I'm going to very briefly go through the eight different criteria--any special conditions and circumstances particularly land,location,size,;'itid characteristics of the structure. And in this case there are none. These are essentially lots that are all pretty much the same within a development wherein the Land Development Code sets out what the standards are for this kind of construction. And we've heard ad nauseam what the standards are,as it's a--it's a 20-foot setback here. And this is a significant deviation from that. Its a 50 percent deviation from the setback,and it's about a 60 percent deviation from the height. So it's a very significant deviation. Any special circumstances do not result from the action of the applicant. Every problem here results from the actions"of the applicant. The applicant is the one who made the error in submitting the application. Yes,the county may have messed up,`aid they occasionally do that,but in this case, still it's the applicant who had--who made the erroneous application. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant? I say that this is not unnecessary undue hardship because they're the one that made the mistake in the first place. Will the variance,ifgr:}$ ;-d,be the minimum variance to make possible a responsible use of the land,building,or structure? The minimum use of this is to build a house,and they're going to be able to build a house;they're just not going to be able to put their pool as close to the water as they want it to be. Will it confer on the applicant any special privilege that's denied by these zoning regulations? Well, yes,it does. What it does is allow this person to build their pool where no one else can build it under the same set of circumstances. So,yes,they are getting a special privilege. Is it going to be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the LDC and not injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to public welfare? Well,it's not in harmony with the LDC;that's clear. And I will get testimony here later that will state that it's injurious to the neighborhood. Natural conditions or physically induced conditions? No,there's no natural conditions or physically induced conditions. This was a bare lot in a subdivision. Will it be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Well,yes,it is. I will admit to that; so it is Page 17 of 46 8A January 19, 2017 consistent with the Growth Management Plan. So,therefore,I mean,I believe and I would argue that this doesn't meet any of the criteria for the granting of a variance and that the variance should be denied. And so that is all I have to say. Thank you very much. Any questions,please? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. Patrick,do you have-- Pat,I've got a couple. MR.NEALE: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The Atlantic(sic)case that you cited is a 1982 case? MR.NEALE: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I did notice you didn't provide it as backup did you do any research to verify that the variance criteria language in there-- in that case in 1982 identical to the variance language--let me finish first. One at a time. MR.NEALE: Sony. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That way it's identical language that we have in today's code. Because in 1982,we didn't even have--our GMP wasn't even enacted yet`'I�`we had--that was an 82-2 code in Collier County. Have you done any of that research? MR.NEALE: Yes,I did;I did. And I went through and,what we call,Shepardi „the case and checked future cases and,basically,they all mirror the same language. And,actually,our c4 ry closely mirrors the language that's set out in Indialantic and other cases that are subsequent in its progeny,so... CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You didn't bring any of that with you? MR.NEALE: I didn't. I wasn't going to make full-blown legal argument here because-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,we definitely would have appreciated you doing that. MR.NEALE: I can do that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You said it's not in harmony. How come it is in harmony in the community that I believe you actually lived at on Marco Island? How come it's in harmony in Isle of Capri? How come that height would have been in harmony elsewhere in county but,uniquely at Vanderbilt Beach,it's not in harmony? MR.NEALE: Well, as you know, legislative decisions are made. This is--obviously,that would be a legislative decision sing out the code as opposed to a quasi-judicial decision. And legislatures can make decisions such as that based on the character of that particular community. So the legislature as it was,the County Commission,or those--Marco City Council made those decisions at that point in time. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I can ask staff this,but I think you probably have the same answer: This bard`s''responsibility is to review consistent to the Land Development Code;is that not true? MR.NEALE: Yes,sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Next speaker,please. MR.REISCHL: Next speaker is George Marks,followed by David Galloway. MR.MARKS Good morning,everyone. My name is George Marks. I live at 319 Lagoon Avenue in Naples. r �, ' And I am a ;_`+ ;t u itect,and I am here for a reason that I think is important to the entire community of Vanderbi (":ch. What has--I,quite frankly,myself and the other neighbors,we feel badly for the people that are trying--the applicants here that are building this property. They hired a designer,they hired a builder,they hired everybody to build this for them,and their house has been built. And,quite frankly,we think they're building a nice house. The problem becomes the issue of the pool,and the problem becomes not just the--not just the issue of the fact of the way this exists now,but the precedent it sets going forward. We don't believe there's a hardship here. We all know that you can't create your own hardship.I've sat on your side of the table. I understand the legal on--Mr.Neale has already addressed that,and I'm not going to repeat that. But the key issue that Mr. Shapiro stated was that all of his pictures were taken from aerial views. It Page 18 of 46 January 19, 2017 8A did not show the actual height of the pool. I can use the--your projector there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We need to have something kept. You can't--you'll need to send that to--can you send that to staff-- MR.MARKS: I will email it to Mr.Reischl as soon as we're done. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MR.MARKS: Okay. If you--can you--does that work okay? Can everybody kind of see that? So if you look at the pool over here that is on the right-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's not on,sir. MR.MARKS: Thank you. If you look at the pool that's set over here on the right,this pool is six-and-a-half feet above the seawall. I'm rounding,of course. This is the property directly adjacent to it,and you can see that in that case the pool is significantly within the zoning. If you look at the property to the other side--so on both sides of this property you can see the pool over here on the adjacent property,that is also within the guidelines,and significantly lower than the height of the pool that is being provided here. We're here trying to be practical,and we're here to understand that this is a difficult situation,but we believe that when the county enacted their zoning law,there are pools that exist that are higher--at the higher level,but in good planning--we moved to Collier Count because you've done such a great job with planning. All that we're asking you for is to enforce the actual zoning laws that you put in place. You lowered the height of the pool,and you gave them the option of building—if you're greater than a 20-foot setback, you have to be lower. If you're set back,you can be higher. Why is tt? It's for visual corridor. What we don't want to have happen and the main reason I'm here is that we do not want this variance to be granted and then the next person that's further away fro the gulf says,well,now I do have a hardship because you allowed that pool to stay in exact,not being within code,and**this becomes a cancer that spreads throughout the entire Vanderbilt community. We are just asking you to enforce the laws that you have. We understand the burden. I'm not going to use the word"hardship"because that's a legal term that we do not believe applies here. To not be unreasonable,we as the neighbors that are objecting and asking that this be held,we understand that all the dimensional variance has already been talked about. This is 60 percent higher. It's 60 percent closer to the canal than it should be. Our concern is that the visual corridor,Mr. Strain,that you spoke about,becomes narrowed.And if you allow this to continue across the whole length of the canal,that visual corridor is diminished. This is not a property on the gulf or on a wide canaIF? If you allow this to happen,it narrows that visual corridor as much as 20 feet for that entire corridor for a corridor that's not that wide to begin with. That's the reason we're here. That's the reason we're spending our dollars in hiring Mr.Neale,and that's the reason we're making(sic)our time to be here tonight. Our suggestion to make a compromise solution to this--and you asked Mr. Shapiro if he came with a compromise. You asked him if he had a solution. We're here to offer a solution. Our suggestion is that the fact that they are even--they're even violating their own 10-foot setback requirement by three and a half feet. Our suggests ts,leave the layout where it is but lower the height. If you look at this photograph, you can see how it is grossly higher than the properties that are adjacent to it. And our--you can see it in that picture very clearly. Our--we're not trying to be unreasonable.We're offering a reasonable solution that says,lower the pool to the required height setback,because we believe that is the bigger issue than the setback. The setback, the steps being six inches wider,we're not here to object to that. We're hoping to have the variance defeated. If we have to,and we have to go to the commissioners and that is--and this variance is granted,we are prepared,because of the importance of this issue by not creating a precedent to appeal at a higher level,we would much rather be reasonable people and have a reasonable solution today that takes care of this issue. Thank you. Page 19 of 46 January 19, 2017 8A COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Could I ask you a question? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Stan? MR.MARKS: Please do. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: The house--as I understand it,that white house,the floor is built to FEMA elevation? MR.REISCHL: Correct. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: How come it looks so much higher than the other two? Are they not? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't know. I don't think he could answer that. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Well,if you took the pool out, u'd still be looking at a white face of the wall of the house because it's built to FEMA elevation. You wouldn't see anything different from this view that I'm looking at if you took the entire pool out. So it would still look the same as--you know,higher than the houses on both sides. MR.MARKS: This view is not the objection.The objection is when you're on the adjacent properties and you're looking out the canal,the fact that pool is six-and-a-half feet above. If it was at the four-feet requirement,you would still be able to see and have a 4al--not as detrimentally impact the visual barter(sic). COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. So this view,even though you showed it,doesn't really mean anything? MR.MARKS: We did not wish to violate the neighbors'rights and walk on their property to take these pictures. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: And the neighb ' e no problem with this? MR.MARKS: Pm not--the neighbors-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We haven't heard all the testimony. ` "! MR.MARKS: We heard that objection on the 43 versus eight I` .tt here to exaggerate any issues. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. Pm just--I was just curious what the objection was with that view. It will lock that When they take the pool out. MR.MARKS ` sing that view to just show the gross difference in the heights. COMMISSIO R CHRZANOWSKE Okay. Thanks. MR.MARKS: k you. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: But that's due to FEMA. MR.MARKS: That's not the issue in play here The issue in play here is the pool,not the height of the building. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. MR.MARKS: We have no objections to the height of the building. CHAIRMAN STRAIN Go ahead,Joe. COMMISSIONER SCTT: I want to go along the same lines. Mr.Marks,is it? MR.MARKS: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER SCRIITT: Just,again,for the record,you're showing a comparison to the height.But you do not ,any information on when that house that you're showing now,the brown house, which,as I look at it,to :-from the back,to the left,you don't have any information on when that was built or what the base flood elevation requirements were for that--on that house when it was constructed; likewise,the house on the right? There's been significant changes--and you know this,you're an architect--in the flood elevation requirements,as Stan alluded to,the base flood elevation,and mandated by the flood zone. And,regardless, you made a statement about reducing the height. They can only reduce the height of the pool,not the house. MR.MARKS: Absolutely. We have no objection to the height of the house. The purpose of this variance is only the pool,and we're keeping our comments just to the pool. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Right. So but the house--clearly,the house that you're showing here to the left of the home that's in question,as I look at it from the back,the base flood elevation is clearly a Page 20 of 46 8 A January 19, 2017 different elevation than what was now required. MR.MARKS: I am not in a position to answer that one way or the other,sir. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. You brought up the comparison. I'm pointing out the difference. MR.MARKS: Understood. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I have a question,a couple questions. First is the County Attorney's Office in regards to the--now,this setting a precedent. Could one of the county attorneys opine on whether this does or not? MR.KLATZKOW: Does it set a precedent? No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Mr.Marks,are you licensed in the state of Florida as an architect? MR.MARKS: My firm does work here. I am personally not licensed. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: In the state of Florida? MR.MARKS: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are you licensed at all? MR.MARKS: I am,yes,sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What state? MR.MARKS: Pennsylvania. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You indicated that they could leave the pool but lower the b ight. As an architect,I don't know if you do structural engineering or designing as well. Do you do just architect or do you do structural included in your firm? MR.MARKS: I have a BS in structural engineering. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Do you know that this is built with grade beams and piling? MR.MARKS: I do. r� CHAIRMAN STRAIN: How would you expect thein in to lowerpool? MR.MARKS: They would have to remove the pool. They'd have to cut off the top of the piles,they have to remove the grade beams. I understand the implications. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I just want the audience to understand and the people on this panel to understand it. Thank you. You indicatedthat--the concern about the view corridor going up and down east and west of that canal. First of all,you live opposite the water from this unit town a little bit about--over a hundred feet away; is that correct? The canal's a hundred feet wide,an assumption. MR. MARKS I am two properties down across the canal. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Your concern is up and down the canal and you feel--I thought you stated that if this went to four feet,as required by the code,and they left it that location,they could actually build the cage like the house you have on the left here. How would a 4-foot-high pool with a cage like that change the view perception when we're only talking two-and-a-half feet overall? So what--how do you see f . that happen � �� n you could Oput the same structures on top of the deck and have the same view corridor that y•Ai.;f .;it with or flout the two-and-a-half feet? MR. • ' S: You can see through a cage. It's a little tough to see through concrete. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So up and down that canal people would be seeing through these cages to get views of the waterway? MR.MARKS: If that is what is permitted by code,I support it. I'm only asking that the county enforce the zoning code as they have presented it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. That's all I've got. COMMISSIONER EBERT: I have a question. Is the seawall at the same level for these properties? Is the seawall all even? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. If you look at this map,this is an example of what I was trying to get the applicant to have responded to earlier. That seawall they put in,according to the certified building permits,it's one foot higher than the seawall to the left. This actually shows that.And I'm assuming that you are not any more familiar with this than I am in that regard. Page 21 of 46 8 A January 19,2017 MR.MARKS: I would look at the picture same as you saw it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That one foot I'm not sure was taken into consideration when this whole variance height part of it came into play because the surveys I'm showing called out the old height of the seawall,not the new height that was certified to,which changes the deviation of a foot. So instead of 50 or 60 percent off,we're a little bit--we're another foot,which will take it down substantially. I'm just not sure how anybody measured this or where the measurement came from. MR.MARKS: I would believe some verification would be there,because if the--if the actual deck is six-and-a-half feet above that seawall,the condition's actually worse. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. But according to the information supplied, it's six-and-a-half feet above 3.2. That's the old height,not the new height. And that's the best I can tell;you from the documents I've read,so... MR.MARKS: Pm not in a position to-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It would have been to the benefit of the applicant to have researched that. I wish they had. I don't have any other questions. Thank you,sir. MR.MARKS: Thank you,everyone. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Next speaker,Fred. MR.REISCHL: Next speaker is David Galloway followed by Nsticy Burns. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By the way,we will take a break at 10:36. MR.GALLOWAY: David Galloway,resident of the Vanderbilt Beach residents area. And,you know,we listen to these issues many times. I have to applaud the Planning Commission.I know there's a lot of research done on your part;I really appreciate it as just an average citizen out in Collier County. I feel for the true applicants,the owner of the property,because it's not their fault even though they hired the contractor,the architects,and whatever,and I feel for them on this issue. I somewhat feel for the builder,the architects,but they didn't do their homework.They didn't do it properly. And even if it was a new employee or newer employee that was--new issues from Marco Island, they obviously didn't know Collier County,so I think that the Collier County has a true problem here as us as the government. I think possibly that when we start issuing hardshipvariances based on financial, it's--we should not be making other people's probll;ms our problet s,,and I say that in all respect,because we've all been through this. I think the only people thatiiake really some fees here are the attorneys. If you look,both sides have attorneys.And it's unfortunate they have to spend the money on their attorneys. It's unfortunate on both sides. I come here free gratis,my time,but it's also an issue that I think we have to--we have great zoning, and code ordinances in Collier County over the years have been developed very strongly,and I support those; I follow them as they've been developed and the people that do--the commissioners that do enact them. But we` do thts` qually and fairly across all lines. And it's a slippery slope when we start granting variancesbased on financial hardship even though it's 50,000,25,000,or 100,000. But also the county should be resible for some of this also and not just saying,well,everybody made a mistake. Let's just let it go away,because ifs not fair to the other citizens that live in that community also. So I speak only as a concerned citizen that we have to constantly,in the Collier County,enforce the ordinances and the code equally across the board so that there's--we don't have these kind of long,drawn-out Planning Commission meetings where everybody gets involved in these. And I think that--overall,I think this could be remedied,but it's an issue that's going to come up again,as we know,someplace in the county,whether it's Marco Island or whether it's here,and northern Collier County,but it's an issue that has to be addressed,and we have to get the personnel that are going to be reviewing this and looking at these things so it doesn't come to this point again. Thanks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. We have time for one more speaker. Page 22 of 46 8 A January 19,2017 MR.REISCHL: Nancy Burns. MR. SHAPIRO: We have a speaker that has to leave at 10:30. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sir,we're--okay. Yeah.You're not supposed to be doing that. Thank you. MS.BURNS: Nancy Burns,and I'm a resident of Vanderbilt Beach,Gulf Shore Drive. Anyway,I do support the Planning Board,and I do believe that the county has an obligation to validate our issues and also support the codes. I really feel for the people. I'm sorry that it's happened for them,but I do feel code should be enforced. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. That was quicker than I thought. We have one speaker, apparently,who has to leave at 10:30. On that basis,we'll try to accommodate them if they'd like to come up to the microphone. Identify yourself for the record. MR.JORGENSON: Thank you for doing that. I appreciate it. My name is Jerry Jorgenson. I live at 367 Lagoon Avenue. I've been there for 11 years. I have to disagree with Mr.Marks fantastically about the views.,With all the trees,palm trees, everything that we have,you can't see up and down the canals anyway. I live right across the street from this property. I looked at a garbage home for 10 years.I had to call inspectors out to get it cleaned up because there was renters there at one time,and the lady was very nice enough to get it taken care of for me. I'm going to tell you something;I drive those canals: the timer and there's a lot of these high things out there,some prior to the codes,some changed. And,by way,that wall you're talking about,all the new ones go in now,and you're probably aware,that they are a foot higher now. So whenever you put in a new seawall,it has to go up one foot higher than the old seawalls, so we have seawalls going up and down,up and down until people build, so it really looks kind of ugly,to tell you the truth. It would be nice if we could all have our seawalls the same height. So there's a lot of issues that occur when you're building. In this case,I live directly across the street. I'm very pleased to see the house the way it is. I don't see it being an eyesore in any way,shape,or form. I'm sorry that the county made a mistake. If they wouldn't have,we wouldn't be standing here today. And maybe the builder made a mistake. The problem is,iswhat--your point you made regarding the cage or someone's point regarding the cage,that is exactly correct. It doesn't y_if you go down our canal,we have some of the ugliest structures that you want to see. I do rather(sic)try to fight to get the gs taken down like I did a lot of huts that used to be on the thing.They were falling apart during the hurric and they finally took them down. The county come out and said,they're not in compliance;take them down. An tthen these grass but things. But on our canal on his side that he looks at,he looks at a lot worse thing than that,I can tell yam.. We have double-deck wooden structures. They were built,you know,back in the day when you could do that,okay,and they were ugly as heck;painted,peeling,ugly-looking decks. There's one guy who keeps his up nice. The other one,he's got a big tent on top of it. I mean,you're talking about--as yore going out of the canal,we're talking about a beautiful home that's going to have a beautiful--t"have every intentions of putting shrubberies and stuff in there. And I don't care what he says;you can't see up and down regardless. I could stand on that side of the canal and sit at Marge and tich's house on their patio,okay--I go over there and visit them a lot--and we can look right down the c <tnd you know,it doesn't obstruct anything. All of our homes rrFviews,even my home which was built a long time ago--I walk out to my pool from ground level because we were built before the codes changed. And I didn't build it; somebody else did. And when we sit up in our home--we live up in the upper level of our home--we see everything because we have a northern view,you know,looking--and it's--we're so happy this is going up that I'm ecstatic. We have a lot of old homes still in our area,and they keep going down. And as you go out the canal--I don't know,Mr.Marks'house,whoever,he's got a big pool wall with a sand thing next to it. It's,in my opinion,very unattractive to look at. Not his wall but,you know--it's just fine.It's the way it is. And he's allowed to do that,and that's fine. We don't have an issue with it.I don't know him very well,and that's his business what he wants to do. Page 23 of 46 8 A January 19, 2017 But in my opinion,you do have--do follow codes. I'm a car dealer. I've built dealerships.We go for variances all the time. You have to go for variances sometimes in life to make things easier and simpler to deal with. If you didn't have variances,what would we have to go back and even--let's just say they wanted a variance before they built because they needed to do it in this particular way because of room--they don't have much room--there's not much property there,so you have to kind of utilize it the best you can. And I'm going to tell you what; it's real nice looking across the street and seeing a beautiful home with a nice wall. And this gentleman Stan,he had a terrific point. I'd rather look at that pool wall than have that pool way down here. Now I'm looking at them trying to build steps to get down to the pool wall,and you're still looking at a wall. And I'm right across the street, literally. And the boat blocks the view anyway,but I like looking at boats,because I have one,too. So thank you for the time. I really appreciate it. And I hope you take under consideration that there's a lot of us there that have no objection to this. I mean,I talked to some of my neighbors;they're not here to speak for themselves,but they said,sure,we don't have a problem with this. [mean,what does it matter? I mean,I agree with rules and stuff,but this one fell through the cracks,and that's why you have variances. And I thank you guys and-- for your time and efforts and the time you guys put into your jobs. Thank you so much for letting me speak early.Appreciate it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you,sir. Now,with that, we will take a break until 10:45,and then when we get back,we'll resume with public speakers and then after,the rest of our agenda. Thank you. (A brief recess was had.) MR.BOSI: Chair,you have a live mike. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. If everybody will please resuie their seats. We left off with public testimony. We're going to resume with public testimony,and Fred wilbe calling the next speaker. MR.REISCHL: Steve Emens,followed by John Prestwood. MR.EMENS: I'm Steve Emens,331 Lagoon Avenue. I am the person who called in April because I noticed that going up. The main reason why I called is I know the code. And at that time,before--they had the slab down, before they built the ceiling,construction(sic)this,I wanted to give them the opportunity,because I knew it was going to cost them a lot of money at the end if they didn't get a variance or if they did not get it approved. That's why I called at that time. I couldn't believe that it got missed because you have your architect that has to do the site plan and the surveyor,your pool contractor has to submit plans with elevations on it,so that's another permit where the elevations got hissed besides the basic permit. So the seawall guy submitted his and,yes,that seawall is up one foot,and the elevation of the deck,I measured it,is six foot from the new seav,So that's where that stands. And IN.tched everybody come out and survey the whole property in April. And then nothing happened. St :7. happened. So now they're applying for a variance after the house is already built. Okay. We're so far al•4 ,we can't do it. It cost too much money. The hom *i is not at fault,I understand.They depended upon a licensed architect;they depended upon a survey that shouIdimo been signed and sealed;they depended upon the pool contractor that should have had signed and searfans because it has engineering. You can't submit any plans without signed and sealed. You have to have your elevations on it. Now,those professionals are insured professionals,and they should know the codes in Collier County. The house is beautiful,okay. Nothing wrong with that. It's a great-looking house. The view's good. It's just that it's not to code. It got passed. I don't know what reason. I've seen things happen a lot of time where--well,I don't know the case,so I'm not going to speculate on it--where somebody said,hey,oh,can't you just do this for me? Sure we can. And then they build it,and then it's too late,without going back, resubmitting plans. I don't know that. But I do know across the street there's a new house under construction about the same stage they are. Page 24 of 46 January 19, 2017 8A They're putting their trusses on right now.The house is 20-foot setback. The pool is a 10-foot setback,and it's 10-foot,and they have their stairs coming down. And in reference to FEMA code,I know that swimming pools and auxiliary setbacks do not have to be at that FEMA height. They can be below FEMA height. But you can build anywhere in Vanderbilt at grade without a height requirement for that pool to be FEMA. It's the pool equipment,electronics,and the main house structure. And that's my understanding. So that's-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Stan? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: You said you called. Who did you call? MR.EMENS: I called Code Enforcement first. I didn't know whether it was a building or a code violation. That's where I noticed it was-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: A slip came in from Joseph Norris,who is a code compliance for the Contractor Licensing. That's the memo in the file that says you called them. It's got your cell number 860 something or other? MR.EMENS: Yeah, 8070. Yeah. I called him.He goes,oh,no,I'm going to forward that on to whomever. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,the only record,the only report is for code licensing. I found under--Code Enforcement didn't get involved at that point. So your call into licensing isn't-- MR.EMENS: Well,yeah,because they turne 'ttjght over to that. They said,oh you're calling the wrong people here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,he went out and took pictures and photographs of the site. So he actually did some of the followup. MR.EMENS: Right,and that's where it all started back then. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: And there's pictures that show what stage it was at when this call was made? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure. We can put them on the overhead if you'd like. This is basically-- it's a similar stage to what you've already got. MR.EMENS: Yeah. I knew it was going to beble• CHAIRMAN STRAIN: There's seven or sq,picttif s. That's one of them. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: And what stage was it at? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Abo$ 4iat it is today They have a--I think-- COMMISSIONER CHRZAko*SKu: So the house was there? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. MR.EMES Not•in April it wasn't all there.They poured the slab,and they were putting up-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr.Norris went out and took these pictures after--in response to the call. So I didn't-- I mean,I havl't got one`:ofthe house. That's a picture of what you just about saw. MR.; MENS: Right. The pool was there because they built it before the house went up. CSTRAIN: Right. Jf ffJ :. MIt' 1=NS: But then when I saw that,it was out--I went over,I measured it. I--and I'm thinking,okay,you going to do your final survey at the end,and now-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What did you measure it with? Did you use a-- MR.EMENS, f ,,,measure. CHAIRMAN SMIN: Tape measure? MR.EMENS: Yeah,yeah. I hooked it on the-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Now,you're the complainant,and you went on the property that you filed a complaint against to show that they were in error.Did you get their permission to go on their property? MR.EMENS: No,I did not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. That's kind of odd.I don't know--I've never heard anybody doing that before. MR.EMENS: Well,no,I just walked around and-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Trespassed. Page 25 of 46 January 19,2017 8A MR.EMENS: I just saw it,and I wasn't sure,okay,so I measured it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You have some--I noticed in looking at your name--and I didn't have your last name;I had your phone number. When I plugged the phone number in to Google,it came up--you had some YouTubes done,and I guess you do pool work for Nassau Pools. MR.EMENS: I build swimming pools,and that's how I knew the code. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. Okay. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I'm still curious what stage the house was at,because the information I got before was that the house was partially up when this happened,and he's saying the house was not up at all. MR.EMENS: Well,the walls were up,but it was clear access. You could come straight through the front over the slab right to get to the pool at that time. There was no--nothing inside. It was open. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think we can let this one go for now. That's more if the applicant wants to deal with the trespass;that's not our issue. Thank you,sir. MR.EMENS: Yeah. Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Next speaker,please. MR.REISCHL: John Prestwood followed by Ronald Rossbach. MR.PRESTWOOD: John Prestwood,P-r-e-s tWw-oo-d. Pm a neighbor also on Lagoon. And I just wanted to support Mr.Marks'and Mr.Emens'comments and those from'Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association that Pm concerned with the code,again,not being enforced. And I realize the more I hear here, it's a very complex situation in terms of the number of errors or perhaps the number of missteps that have been made along the way. I'm in insurance by trade;retired now. I also wondered about the liability that someone else will probably need to determine in this regard,depending upon how you rule,but there is errors and omissions insurance also with respect to the professionals all mentioned here: Architects,builders,engineers,and so forth. I don't know about the county I wouldn't surmise on that. But it seems like there's a lot of missteps that have been made. So I would encourage you to enforce the code. If there's something that can be done to accommodate things,fine. As far as materiality,$50,000,maybe that's for you to decide. We're talking about multi-million-dollar homes here in this neighborhood. Fifty thousand dollars on a house in Golden Gate might be a lot 44 nt than$50,000 in Vanderbilt Beach. T €� **to say. I support the-- Mr. Marks',Mr.Emens'comments,and I appreciate your work u. . CIifAIRMAN SLAIN: Thank you, sir. Next speaker? MR. REISCHL: The uectspeaker,Ronald Rossbach followed by Margaret Rossbach. MR.ROSSBACH H . Ronald Rossbach. I live at 355 Lagoon,just opposite the canal,in the canal where the house is. ,;,„,* I just want towknow we have no objections. As a matter of fact,we felt that the whole situation there,the bu'u € R`# "`` .e boat and everything,Just enhances our view of the canal. rV , CHAIRMAN >t``-:>� J N: Thank you,sir. MR.REISCHL: The final registered speaker is Margaret Rossbach. MS.ROSSBACH: My name is Margaret Rossbach.I am Ronald's wife. I live at 355 Lagoon Avenue,and Pm directly across from house in question. And before that,we have been--we built our house in 1980. We've been here over 30 years,and we love it here. This is paradise. And from a woman's point of view,this is so gorgeous that it just enhances the neighborhood,and I don't understand why--or I won't understand if this is not going to be approved because it's just all positive. Before that,then there was a house that it was a duplex. It was much older than our house.I'm sure Jerry, if he was here,he would say I'm one of the houses that he doesn't like,but I love my home,and it's Page 26 of 46 January 19, 2017 8A going to be there until I kick the bucket. And I'm 86 years,going to be 87. So they're going to have to wait a while,because they take such good care of you here in Naples that sometimes you live to be 90 something. So this is not the first time I'm going to come here to beg you to just let this go on and let us all be happy. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you,ma'am. Next speaker? MR.REISCHL: That was your final registered speaker. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Would you put something on the overhead. I need to clarify one item. It's Page 10 of the staff report,which is the black-and-white survey. You don't have the staff report? MR.REISCHL: On my computer,electronically. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You guys. We need to have printers in this room,I can tell. Diane,can I borrow yours? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I've got scribbles on mine. r, MR.REISCHL: I was trying to keep up with the chairman on being elec <#4 } on this one. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,you've got to get an Apple then. Sorry. 1 MR.EASTMAN: The advantages of paper. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Actually,that's not the one-- it doesn't show enough. Th �`:al survey is the few pages back from that,Joe. Keep going.It's this one,here. MR.REISCHL: Oh,the resolution. It's attached to the resolution,I believe. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. That's it. If you could let him borrow that,Patrick,that would be great;thank you. Okay. What I wanted to point out on here--and,actually you need to zoom in a little bit on the part by the waterway. Right there. Notice on the lower right-hand corner it says,set drill hole on top of concrete seawall,and NAVD elevation,3.32. That's the same elevation that the old seawall was at based on the permit application. Permit application said to cap it,add one foot to it so it would be 4.2,and it also was certified to that. Now, if you'll look over on the left,second note up,it says,per contractor,pool patio stem wall is at 9.9. Now, if you take 9.9,subtract the 3.2,you get your 6:6,which is the issue in question today.What Pm suggesting is it's not 9.9,and then the 3.2 is now 4.2,so the real difference is 5.6;5.6 is 18 inches over the four feet that's allowed. And I guess I've got a question to staff. At that 18 inches,would someone measure from the cap of the seawall,or they'd have to go next door and measure from the old seawall to determine the height that's supposed to be used for this deck.? Corr;This is the survey that was submitted. I spoke to Mr.Jones,one of the attorneys in`ovf asked that,an4 this is what was resubmitted. CHA I' i ST• � , at's not the question. MR.BO '.« >!.,. ° `} The new seawall,the seawall constructed at this property would be the benchmark for where``° '>ion would start. CHAIRMAN ' F'':(N: Okay. That's what I'm getting at. Now,we've heard testimony that probably--I can't--I have to question how it was obtained,that it was measured by the tape measure to be closer to six--well,five-and-a-half feet or whatever. I would suggest we maybe have an 18-inch discrepancy here instead of a 24-inch. But it's just something to consider as we go through this,and maybe the applicant, by the time they get to the Board of County Commissioners,will have that resolved. I would highly recommend to them that,rather than wait any longer,they do it right away. With that,I don't have any more questions at this time,but we do have an opportunity for the applicant-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Mark? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. Page 27 of 46 r January 19, 2017 8 A COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: While you're on that survey,I'm fascinated,upper left-hand corner,in the center line of Tradewinds Avenue,there's a NAVD nail(sic)and a couple in elevation 2.8,and I thought every road in Collier County was at five minimum. So I--you know,that just fascinates me. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. This is the time when the applicant's representative or the applicant themselves,someone,you have an opportunity to make a rebuttal if you want to do so. I either need to have you acknowledge you don't have a rebuttal or you'd like to utilize the time. MR. SHAPIRO: Sure. Do you mind if I use this? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Go right ahead. MR. SHAPIRO: I will be very brief,because I think a lot of the points were,I guess,well brought out and hit on. I would just like to bring out,and I think that the counsel here already has, is that this doesn't set any legal precedent as,of course,I believe most of you know,and I think that's what a lot of the objectors had issue with is that,you know,maybe this would set a precedent down the line. But as you know,under case law,these are done on an individual basis,so,the ruling today doesn't set any precedent for future,and hopefully this problem won't happen again. Again, going by the staff report,I think,you know,there's enough blame to go around. You know,I am not saying that the petitioner's people,you know,maybe they should have done things more thoroughly, maybe the county should have reviewed it more thoroughly,but we have what we have here today,and we have a very unique circumstance because the permit was issued relying on the wrong setbacks,and because we have what we have here today,we can just make decisions going forward,and I just feel that the economic hardships of having to tear all that out and put a new pool in over somewhere between 18 inches and two-and-a-half feet would just be a very large hardship compared")the negligible impact that this has. So with that,I thank you for your consideration. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Okay. When we had some discussion earlier, I think a few of you indicated you had other questions you wanted to ask before we go--before we close the public hearing,so now is the time to do that. I can't remember-- COMMISSION SCHMITT: My questions are answered. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Everybody else? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I'm all-- COMMISSIONER SCHMI'I'I: Deliberate. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then we will close the public hearing,and we will entertain discussion before ve go for motion,if there's discussion. Does anybody have any discussion items they want to bring up? Joe? ::. COMMISSIONER SCHMItr: And folks in the audience,I was the community development administrator from 2010 to 20--correction,2001 to 2009. So during that tenure,of course,I was responsible for all the zo �. in the county as far as all the review and the building department,zoning department,and other departm 6 6,under that organ nation,which there's been some changes since. But I left in 2009. So I have a clear understanding of the process. And the only reason I bring up my background,because this is not the first variance in this area. I could tell you that because we've had similar situations in the past where,because of the code,there is confusion or there still continues to be confusion which,frankly,when I received the packet,I was--as I said,it brought back some tough times in that department. But that said,it is an unfortunate circumstance. The design professional's responsible. The homeowner hires design professionals who are licensed, and they're responsible,and I clearly understand that. As an engineer I understand that. The issue at hand,though,is this is an area for redevelopment. It is the original Naples Park.It's been an issue for probably 30 years in the county as this area redeveloped,and these--all these lots redeveloped primarily because of the location,not as much as Naples Park has,but all these lots are--were teardowns and rebuilds. The issue in this area,Vanderbilt Beach,was a continual problem when I was in the county seven years ago,as it is,I guess,right now,because we're faced with the same situation of,clearly, 10 pounds of Page 28 of 46 19, 2017 8 January flour in a 5-pound sack,because that's--most of these homes are maximizing the building envelope that's allowed. I do think it's an unfortunate circumstance but,however,from the standpoint of the variance,as far as I'm concerned,the house exists,the pool exists,and I'm ready to make a motion,if the--but I'll hold off until we make some further discussion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Pm glad you said flour. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I did. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: The military term is blivet,b-l-i-v-e-t. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does anybody else have any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I have one item I'd like to discuss. Mike or Fred,would you put what I just handed you on the overhead. You need to back off a little bit. Keep going. Keep going. Right there. So we can read the whole thing. Section 9.04.03 is our criteria for variances.You've heard tray that there are eight criteria;there are. And we've had legal counsel advise us from the opposition side to address their position on those eight criteria. Also,a case was referred to us,an old case from a 1982 activity. But we here as'that attorney, even the opposition attorney and as staff has opined today,we're here to adhere to the Land Development Code. The Land Development Code says this in the beginning of the criteria for variances: "Findings: Before any variance shall be recommended for approval to the Board of the Zoning Appeals,the Planning Commission shall consider and be guided bytkOollowing standards in making a determination." So while we've heard that they're hard and fast rules,you've gc t show a hardship,it can't be this kind of hardship,maybe so,but at the same time we shall consider those guided by them.That means it's not mandatory. And,Mike,ifonread this differently as Zoning Director,please let me know. But it's my understanding that it means*VirtOsays,that we're not bound by thoseeight items,but they are for consideration. MR.BOSI: My understanding* ould be--the interpretation that you've adopted would be my understanding;that these are the guidelines and with that emphasis upon the guidelines. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And with that in ind,I have-- I've listened to everything,and I've certainly tried to doall the research I can to understand how this happened. I can't see the benefit to force someone totear down a home such as this. There's been no shown malicious intent in this. It was an--it was a human error. It was a mistake made by multiple parties. To take them to task for this for the cost that it would require for an item that does not set a precedent I don't think is necessary. Now,if we can show they purposely had misled the county,this was done intentionally,I'd say then whatever they deserve they deserve in regards to correcting it. But I have looked at all the records. I have looked at them probably more thoroughly than anybody in this room,aiassure you nothing like that came out of any of those records. And they're records that this panel doesn't i✓venhave access to. They're in the county records department. I've pulled all the folders. There's nothing there 7. <.s malicious intent. In fact,if anythr�`l ey were trying to continually keep up with things they needed to to make sure their approvals were consistent and reviewed by the county. So I certainly think that the variance is warranted in this case,whether the variance is 24--two-and-a-half feet--yeah,two-and-a-half feet or 18 inches. Either way,it really doesn't matter. The pool's there,and it should be approved. The only thing I would suggest is that a stipulation be added to do make sure that the intent of where these are allowed at this height,which is everywhere else,basically,but Vanderbilt Beach,that the decorative cladding or landscaping and a berm or a combination thereof of some nature is there,is put in front or applied to this wall to soften it,as the other jurisdictions would have--where they had done so in other parts of the county. Page 29 of 46 8 A January 19,2017 And with that,that's all I've got to say.And if there's nobody else here,we'll close the public hearing and we'll entertain a motion. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I make a motion to approve. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I'll second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Will that motion be subject to the stipulation for the-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Subject to the stipulations as discussed. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Second. MR.REISCHL: And the staffs stipulation,too. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Staff stipulation as well noting that,subject to the 50 percent rule, that anything constructed thereafter would have to require compliance with the existing code. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion's been made to recommend approval for the variance subject to staffs recommendation and the one stipulation we just discussed. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor,signify by saying,aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 6-0. , Thank you,all,for attending this morning.We a , , COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI Mark,co4.4 thing'? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I was very impressed by the drone photos,and I would think that--seriously,I don't know why the county doesn't do that on a lot of these projects. And I don't know what it takes to legally do drone photos or buy drones,but it seems like,you know,we're the county;we ought to have that kind of photography coming to these meetings instead of the petitioner. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: It's a great idea.The challenge is the FAA. I can tell you,as a realtor,they're really cracking down. There's a lot more criteria as to where and when you can fly.I've got to be honest,I don't know with that drone shot--and I'm not trying to open up a can of worms here,I've been told in the past those drones aren't allowed to fly over Vanderbilt Beach either or over that area. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I would have to--I'd have to agree. The last thing I'd-- COMMISSIONER C 1" •NOWSKI: A can of worms? CHAIRMAN STRA 1 - `'.alike to see is the government having the power of drones. CO I e` IER S foiJ TT: Stay away from that. COMMI : No trespassing and no drones. CONIMISSrl ' #' ANOWSKI: We work with Luddites. CHAIRMAN S " 1: Oh, Stan. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Stan,stay with Google Earth. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: ***Okay. That takes us into the next item,the only item remaining on today's agenda. It's the review of the Land Development Code for both the preservation,I believe,open space and conservation of golf course areas,and this will be a presentation made by staff,Caroline Cilek. It will be our second or third time around for some of these,and not the final. MS.CILEK: Correct. Good morning. Caroline Cilek,for the record. I would like to go through the amendment that has the most individuals here for public comment first,if that's okay with-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do you know what that is,or do you want me to ask? Page 30 of 46 8A January 19,2017 MS.CILEK: I don't. If you could ask. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: How many people are here for the golf course amendment? (Show of hands.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: How many people are here for anything else but that? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh,I think it's the golf course amendment. MS.CILEK: Thank you for asking. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Let's move right into that,then,Caroline. Just tell us what page of the staff report to start with. MS.CILEK: All righty. We are going to take a look at--the narrative begins on Page 24,and we have highlighted text that has been amended since we last saw you. And I'm happy to answer questions on the narrative. Mostly,it was just explaining the changes in the LDC text. There are a couple of errors,but we highlighted those and fixed them. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That narrative was,yeah,pretty much just the corrections we talked about last time or the other things you caught. Does anybody have any narrative questions and on the--no? COMMISSIONER EBERT: Caroline,I will be calling you,though,because I tY imd the last meeting,and I know this is a very important-- MS.CILEK: Okay. COMMISSIONER EBERT: --subject for this count So with the three different reports that we've had so far,I will be in contact with you,because I want to get it down right. MS.CILEK: No problem. I'm always available. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well,let's move directly into the LDC language. MS.CILEK: Super. That begins on Page 34, and we've added a newLDC section to this amendment and are amending+3 , 7,`part of the preservation standards,and this is in regards to basically mirroring and supporting an, ¢ �$° 4 •n that we're adding in the greenway area of the code so that it's consistent throughout. And I would l �e'xplain it when we get to that portion because I think it will be a little easier to understand. CHAIRMAN S Okay. That will take us to your--that's the first section of highlighting on Page 34,right? t', ; MS.CILEK: Yep. COAIRMAN STRAIN: Then when we move to Page 35,we've got some more. I10.CILEK: So Page 35 we begin the 5.05.15 language. And I have a couple of small changes I'd like to just share with you so that when we bt'ng the amendment back on the 30th,it's as clean as possible. We Wold like to chane,p,,.*B on B3,compatibility design review,that last sentence,we're going to remove that s or "permitted." §_,itted conditional use is a little bit awkward,and we're just going to start that sentence off whikidentifyi4tft conditional uses. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Caroline,also. MS.CILEK: Yep. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: I'm sorry. Right before that under B 1,2 and 3,it talks about utilizing a use, and I think you want to put"where the proposed use." So,for example,zoning actions,this section applies to a golf course constructed in any zoning district where the proposed use is not currently. MS.CILEK: Okay. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: And I would make that similar type of change under 1,2, and 3. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Great. MS.CILEK: I could do that. So we're just going to clean up the last sentence of 3,and then we made the change to"constructed"consistent throughout A. My next changes are on Page 36 under the DAS,the Developer's Alternative Statement. And here our changes are under 2.B.I.A and B,and these were in reference to our discussion at the last meeting.And Page 31 of 46 8A • January 19,2017 staff was also thinking about,you know,how to relate the golf course to the HOAs that exist or may exist during the conversion process. And so this is what we have proposed for our language. I'd like to just get your feedback and see if this will work for the Planning Commission. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's better. Yeah. It gets us there. MS.CILEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Last week,I think it was,or maybe early--yeah,I think it was last week--one of the land use attorneys,Richard Yovanovich,was talking to me about something else,and I could tell he was really excited about the golf course conversion standards. And one of the things that he mentioned--and it was a good point. I'll have to concede that--that there is no time frames for response to these. So if someone puts them on the table,how long have they got to sit there before they're considered qualified and met that criteria? And I think that's a very good point. We need to make sure it's tightened up that way. And I'd suggest by the time we come back we figure out a way to address that. MS.CILEK: Sure. In previous drafts we had proposed time frame in particular for 2.B.II,but it's my understanding that generally the County Attorney's Office doesn't support timelines. But I'd be happy to start that conversation again with them and see if it's something we can include. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well,I mean,I'm just concerned if,say,we require--well, obviously,if this goes through,someone's required to meet that standard. So there's a letter out there now on the Riviera golf course,for example.It says they want$3.5 million,and they're offering it to the county and maybe others and international investors and all this. Well,how long before we can say,okay,they offered it to these various groups,there was no response,yet they go and sell it to another or somebody that tries to put homes there,and the other groups say,wait a minute. We haven't respond to that offer yet. I think out of fairness to everybody,a time frame ought to be established,and maybe 'tere's a way the County Attorney's Office could see fit to find something to include here. If not,then we need,I guess,the leg . I'd like to know the understanding how we deal with it legally in regards to when does an offer expire MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Well. I'd prefer not to put a time tiii:m there and to just apply a reasonableness standard. This is sometng they have to prepare a report as to the alternatives and what they did,and that's something that you can question as they go forward. But I can't image that,you know,they'd be aWtie,get through the application process with only giving them a couple weeks,because we know how it tak44. how long it takes to get through the process to begin with. So--but if you want a date,we'll come up with a time frame. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,I would just want to make sure that--and I'm sure--Mr.Yovanovich is here today,so I'm sure he's going to jump in. And now that I brought this up,I'm sure we'll hear more,but I would like to make sure we have a reasonable understanding on how this unfolds so that,for example,the offer that's on the county right now from t ;owner of Riviera,that's how this one came about. They sent a letter over to the commissioner and said,we're considering selling this. Is the county interested in buying it? What if the county doesn't respond for two or three years and they decide after they've sold to somebody else want to buy it?4 think that's the scenario I'm concerned about,so... MS.ASHTON-CICKO: I mean,I would be reluctant to put a period longer than 30 days after the date that they issue arra ? #tter because I think that we could have some problems with,you know, interfering with the tra sfe :cif property if they're looking to sell it to other parties and,also,I don't want to get into takings claims or anything like that,so... CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I understand. Thank you. MS.CILEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's all I've got to say on it. Never mind. We'll listen to Mr. Yovanovich's argument and go from there. MS.CILEK: Okay. On 2.B.III,the Conceptual Development Plan,we would like to just tidy up the sentence structure of the first sentence. We're going to break it into two parts. It's a compound sentence. It needs to be a little easier to read,so we'll share that with you at the next--no intent changes,just making it a little bit simpler to understand. Page 32 of 46 8A January 19,2017 That's all the changes I have on 36. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MS.CILEK: Page 37,the cross-reference in 3.0 is incorrect. Line 20 needs to be Subsection G, which is the greenway. It moved. One thing I did want to ask you about is 3.D,Line 32. This is something that was an oversight on my part. At one of the previous Planning Commission meetings,we had talked about removing the word "reasonable"when talking about what the stakeholders are providing as input and that all input should be addressed. And in our admin code sections,we're actually going to get a little bit more detail about that,and we're going to say it be addressed in categories. So not every single question has to be listed out,but rather this category of question and provide a paragraph response. So that's a little easter for the applicant to be able to do that. But here we did not remove the term"reasonable." So I think on Line 32 in this section,we need to make this consistent with the following section and remove the"reasonable"term,because we want all input to be responded to,whether it's reasonable or not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MS.CILEK: 4.B,Line 49 and Line 50,we have updated the language as requested by the Planning Commission and the County Attorney's Office,and this was regarding basically prohibiting deviations from this section. And that's all I have on that page. Anything else? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. MS.CILEK: Okay. Page 38,just some cleanup; in F.4 we're missing a couple small words. And then on Page 39,this is wheret40,into the good stuff,following up with our conversations regarding preserves on the golf course. All right. So down on G.3,Line 49,'We took a comprehensive look at preserves. And I worked with our environmental staff to prepare this language.And we have two different concepts going on here.One is where we have isolated preserves less than a half an acre in size. We are supporting them to be able to re-create a preserve greater than that half an acre. Currently when thrift'done,a PUD deviation has to be requested and approved. Here we're saying you don't have to go through the PUD deviation request,ru can just do that automatically. And then that's why we added 3.05.07-to thmendment so that it all r that as well in that section. MS.ASHTON-CMCI(0: I do have a recommen change on this section. MS.CII K: Sure. MS.ASTON-CICKO: Caroline asked to meet with me,but I wasn't available. Under Line 47,I would say,"The following preserve standard supplement" in place of"requirements are n to." So it`would read,"The following preserve standard supplement,those in the LDC Section That's great„,, MS`` ' ON-CICK, d then I would combine the two sentences in A. So under Line 51,it w would say,"Co`nsoldated into x$ ,�priated preserve that may be greater than one acre in size int the aggregate to meet the preserve requirement,'‘'and then you would delete the second sentence that's on the top of Page 340. �j f MS.CILEK: Weli6 do that. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody? MS.CILEK: Okay. And then on Page 40,the second concept is looking at existing preserves.And we've broken it into two sections to deal with straight zoning golf courses and PUD golf courses,because they are very different. So in the first one,B.I,we're looking at a straight zoning or conventional zoning district,the GC,or another zoning district that's straight zoning. And here we're saying that they may utilize that preserve that's on that golf course toward the new development,because it's a self-contained parcel of land zoned,and it's rezoned,and they can use that preserve as they move forward. Page 33 of 46 January 19,2017 8 A Under B.II,we're looking at a PUD. And here,when they put the preserve,it was in connection with the existing development within that PUD project,and so they would be able to use excess preserve on the golf course but not the preserve for the current PUD project because it's already been utilized by what was approved previously. Any questions on what we're proposing for the preserves? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Nope. Before you go down to H,I got a couple questions that probably fit into this category. MS.CILEK: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You and I touched on them a little bit,and I think the last meeting I asked about them. First of all,transportation. Many of these golf courses are within communities that are somewhat restrictive as far as the size of the roads go. They have existing density in there. We haven't addressed how that's supposed to be handled or looked at. Likewise,many of the golf courses only have small accessways to the roadways because they used them for either golf carts or maintenance carts. Well,putting a road system in,that's substantial. And I learned at a meeting I was at last week,it was--that some of these side--where they say a golf course was going to go in and they didn't have enough access,wide enough accessway,they wanted to pick up enough land to make it wide enough for a roadway. nµ e Well,the land on both sides,a lot of times,is deed restricted fo�.�gl -famil y or residential housing. All that is going to come into play,and we haven't addressed it here •ilt something that--how would that come out of this process?Because it would be good to know that early on. If I was the applicant,I'd want to know,okay,I better get over some of these thresholds before I even go out to these people. We haven't addressed transportation,so--have you thought about addressing it in some manner? MS.CILEK: Well,two things to remember. One is that the Conctual Development Plan on Page 36,which is requirement of the DAS and then is taken through'the stakeholdefoutreach meetings and then is utilized through the land use petition process,does require that existing and proposed roadway and pedestrian systems are identified. So they're going to have to figure out how they're going to--what roadways are going to be used and how they're going to access this project.And then from there,our idea was that the standard LDC requirements for transportation would apply to the project. CHAIRMAN STRAIN Oki. So that means th Their widths for those accessways would have to meet our minimum standards and there's not any exceptions into this process. MS.CILEK: Correct. It wild be what is already in the LDC,and they would need to show that they wotadineet those. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I-- MS.ASHTON-CICKO: But I believe if they're doing,like,a PUD amendment,they could ask for a deviation to,you know,reduce the widths like they do with most petitions. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I`ight. And that's just something that would have to be considered on it's own merit. MS.CILEK: That would be-- MS.ASHTON-CICKO: And as you know,but maybe the others don't,as part of our review,we do check to make sure that they have legal access. We confirm that on all the projects. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But your legal access in the way you look at it is--you analyze the width of the accessway in regards to the minimum standards of the code,or you take into consideration the deviation--how do you evaluate? MS.ASHTON-CICKO: We'd be confirming that they have an easement that allows them to use those roadways for access. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Those accessways for,like,a public road or private-- MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Or a private road. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: --or a private road,because a lot of times those may be restricted to golf course access only. In fact,I know one golf course that is deed restricted and so that those connections can Page 34 of 46 January 19, 2017 8A only be used for golf maintenance vehicles or golf carts. That,then,wouldn't meet your standard as far as public access roadway that had to be redone. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: They'd have to clean that up through the courts. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And at the same time,the width of the roadway would be something that you wouldn't necessarily--would you care about that in your legal review,or would you defer that to the review later on? I mean,if they come up with a 30-foot access,would you still say--and they actually have it for road use and vehicles,but that can't meet our standard. So how would that be approached by your department? MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Well,I would advise staff that they have a 30-foot easement,and I wouldn't be looking at the widths myself. That would be up to staff to say that's insufficient or to the applicant to request a deviation that's going to get down that low,but that will be a Board decision. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Then the second--go ahead. MS.CILEK: Real quick. Thank you,Heidi,for mentioning that. Yes,staff did contemplate that the deviation process may be utilized for transportation. But a thing to consider was that it would be required that the applicant identify all the deviations either at this zone(sic), if they know of them,or at the NIM. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's right. It is at the NIM. Thank you. Then the second item I want to make sure we somehow think about,some of these golf courses are not contiguous,and they're little pieces. We ran into this about a year ago on one of them that came through, and it just dawned on all of us in the pre-ap that,wait a minute,you:P `t do a PUD.They don't connect. To do straight zoning on five different pieces might be real awkward. So how--and we would--if this were to happen,the best thing to creativity--creative-wise proceed would be for the public's benefit and for this board and the Board of County Commissioners is to consider this as a PUD use. That way we can, you know,be creative on how it's protected in,the neighborhood. But we can't get there the way it is now. So I knowyou were going to look into that and try to figure out a solution for it. What have you come up with? MS.CILEK: Well,I would be happy to work with te County Attorney's Office to see if we can include a provision within 5.05.15 to allow for PUDs to be multi parcels and go through the process. Due to advertising requirements,we weren't able to advertise that section of the code,which is in Chapter 4,to ensure consistency with both sections,, We could--I can work with the County Attorney's Office and figure out what's the best path for it to address that,but we're not going to be able to do Chapter 4 by the 30th,which is just in a week and a half away. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well,maybe we can just figure out a way it can be addressed then. MS.CILEK: Sure. We will follow up on that. CHAIRMAN STRAjW,Okay. Anybody else have anything on that? (Nor onse.) MA C STRA t.. Okay. Anything else,Caroline? MS. il$4just ��oto go through H real quick,which is the lighting. So we put together a bit of information ah**.n/, ,�g�f '` al Dark Sky and Dark Skies concepts in your packet. Hopefully,you f . were able to take a loif _ And from that research,we were able to provide you language in H. We did change it a bit. And at the end of the day,you know,lighting,depending on the type of use,can be really specific. So we really do want it to go through the process to figure out what is best for compatibility with some overarching goals of making sure that there's reduction of glare and sky glow. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Catches the finers points of it. Okay. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: I have a quick question just for clarification. MS.CILEK: Sure. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: So H,Line 35,34,excessive glare,I get that. Light trespass and sky glow. Help me understand the light trespass part of that. MS.CILEK: Yes. So light trespass is when your light that's on your property continues over into Page 35 of 46 January 19, 2017 8 A the other person's property. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Okay. MS.CILEK: So we,as the Planning Commission knows,have gone through several PUDs where they are addressing this issue,and they do it by a distance requirement or by having a shielded light source. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Caroline,I think that takes us just about to the last page,then,doesn't it? MS.CILEK: Sure. On Page 40 I'll just mention,all of 10.03.06 is new,but it's all just implementing the standards in the section. I'll be happy to answer any questions. We tried to make no changes; simply share what needed to happen from the notice perspective. And this information will also be in the administrative code sections as well. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Great. Thank you. Mike? Oh,before we go to public speakers,is there any questions from the Planning Commission of staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Mike? We're going to start out with the registered public speakers, then if anybody else is not registered and you'd still like to speak,we're here to listen to you,so... MR.BOSI: Chair,there's two registered speakers. Mr.Edward Tappen and Diane Rupnow. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr.Tappen,now you're up. MR.TAPPEN: Tappen. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tappen,thank you. MR.TAPPEN: Thank you. My name is Edward Tappen,`T-a-p-p-e-n. For the last year,I have been an advocate for having Collier County establish common municipal golf courses. Collier now has none. I believe that I am a common person that is one who lacks the characteristics of having power;therefore,I have written letters,asked for advice from others,attended county meetings,and written to people in power positions and collected a great deal of information. I love golfing. Like millions of average andoommon people across the world,I would rather be golfmg today,any day. Many common people in Collier County,including visitors,cannot afford to play golf in Collier County. Imagine that. In fact,joining a country club is out of the question for most common people like me. I am a single golfer who has paid$900 more annual fees than the player I played next to and who joined as a couple m ottoof the smallest clubs in Naples. In April of 2015,1 began--after being taken advantage of,it came to an end last year,so I resigned that small country club September 2015.Many country clubs charge more for single inequity members than each golfer who joined as a Maple;however,Lakewood seemed to be a higher percentage,and my appeal to the directors or owners was d `$ << In April 2016,Lakewood Country Club news told members Lakewood club--golf club is definitely ntt sale,is not to be sold. Because Lakewood G dory Club is owned by approximately 66 equity members and found that they had financial problems,they voted to sell the club. A recent letter to the editor said it is now listed for sale at 2.9 million. Before the 66 members voted to start negotiations for sale,they were told it probably would be worth two or two-and-a-half million and that as of this time,our lawyer states that--this is a quote;our lawyer states that any remaining funds available,(sic)all commitments are met,will be equally shared among these 66 equal members. The current loan balance is approximately$170,000. Actually,the county market value is much less than 2.9 million. Even when Lakewood is having financial problems,the board of directors has not increased their annual fees for more than five years. Their management of the club and getting members to vote seem questionable when they voted yes. I believe that the county could negotiate to save golf land without rezoning. That's my appeal to this board,this commission. I have collected a lot of information during the past years,this past year,and will gladly share it to Page 36 of 46 , January 19, 2017 8 A the Planning Commissioner--Commission,you. I have collected--letting greedy people profit and changing natural land would be a shame. The Planning Commission should at least offer to negotiate with owners and find out the facts,then provide commissioners a plan to save the natural lands. In addition,when and if the county owned the land,it could hire professional managers and often--and offer good workers that are maintaining the courses at this time. The workers at,for instance, Lakewood have been exceptional and,under management of professionals,could do wonders. The county might even get an award from the Audubon intentional program and be designated as a certified Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary. See the paper from yesterday or the day before. I think it was yesterday. Another municipality provided--other municipalities have provided funds to have golf courses since 1899. Why not Collier? Bob Cooling who lived at Lakewood and was on the founding equity--one of the founding equity members said when he heard about Lakewood being put up for sale,the club--he said--and this was recorded in the minutes--the club needs a financial expert. The answer in the minutes of that meeting were,this has been investigated. Mr. Cooling passed away in June 2016. That concludes what I have to say. I have copies of this to share with whoever. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,there's a couple things you probably could benefit from being aware of. The request to change the language in the code to do what we're being asked to do,today would assist in getting--accomplish maybe what you're asking for. You want the county to consider purchasing a public golf course,whether it's Lakewood or one other. One of the steps that are required here,as these courses come up for conversion,the county would be considering those.It doesn't mean they're going to buy them, but that option would be on the table. The documents that you have would be better held until that process starts. This is just the process to get to where you want to go. If this gets approved,when they convert that golf course,one of the steps they have to do is offer it to the county,they have to offer it to the homeowners association,if they're interested, and then the general public or whoever else they want to offer it to at that point. So some of the issues you're asking for could be attained once this language is adopted,and that's what this meeting today is about is getting that far. So it's the first step,and it may actually help what you're trying to do. MR.TAPPEN''I understand,but as a common person trying to figure out why they are--I'm sure that money buys what people want. And what I'm saying is that if the rezoning goes on to a--to have people sell their golf course,then the land is gone. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We don't disagree,but these steps will help the county at least consider that golf course for a purchase. That's--so that goal is somewhat in line with what you're talking about.We just need to get this language going first,and then that will happen. Other than that,this board doesn't make any decisions on purchases by the county.'That's made by the county commissioners.But I think this would help that process get started,so... MR.TAPPEN: Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN STRAIN Thank you,and for your patience in waiting today. I appreciate this. Mike,next speaker? WA MR.BOSI: Thenext speaker,and it's the last official speaker slip,is Diane Rupnow. MS.RUPNOW: Thank you. I've read the draft,and I'm pleased that stakeholders will have an opportunity for input in this process. I think that's a very important feature. If the intent of this amendment is to identify and facilitate the process of converting preexisting golf courses into non-golf course use,why isn't that language in the document,is my question. What would be wrong with including a statement that this conversion amendment applies only to preexisting golf courses that were in business prior to the April 12th,2016,moratorium and not just to a golf course that's in the permit process? That's my only question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm not sure--well,when we get done with public speakers,I'll ask staff to address your question,okay? MS.RUPNOW: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do we have any other registered public speakers? Page 37 of 46 January 19,2017 8 MR.BOSI: None. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Is there any member of the public who has not spoken that would like to speak on this matter today? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Caroline,you heard the lady's question. Pd like to make sure we get it clarified. If you're not clear on the question,we can have it asked again. It was a little fuzzy,but did you understand where she was going? MS.CILEK: Well,I think we can say that moratoriums,basically,do not allow people to come forward with new pre-application meeting requests and to submit rezones and the like. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Or golf courses. MS.CILEK: Or golf course conversions,period. So it would have applied to any golf course that existed as of,you know,April 12,2016,date. COMMISSIONER EBERT: So a working golf course as of April,okay. MS.CILEK: Yeah. Any of those that were previously approved or under the moratorium or if they were seeking to convert. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And that moratorium is up in--April 11t`h,right? MS.ASHTON-CICKO: The language that you are considering is golf courses that are constructed. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Already in use? MS.ASHTON-CICKO: That's the applicability. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Constructed. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: If it's built it doesn't-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If a deve has built a golf course,then that golf course would fall under this new language. MS.CILEK: Right. That's the second part of the concept,I would think. CHAIRMAN STRAINRight. And I hope that answers COMMISSIONER SCIMITT: The amendment—to c1ar ,` question,the amendment covers all aspects,whether conversion or retention under some other type of rh `g ment,meaning the county could take it over or somebody else. I mean,this is not an amendment strictly just to redevelop a golf course. It's also an amendment to allow other options for retention in other uses. MS.CILEK: Sure,yes. Through the process. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT I think that was your question,was it not? CHAIRMAN STRAIN.'You'll have to come up and use the mike again. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You'll have to come up. MS.RUPNOW: I get confused by all this technical language. All I want to know is does this conversion apply to golf courses that were in business,and it was my understanding that there are quite a few golf courses that maybe haven't been making a profit and,therefore,they want to convert their golf course to some other use.,,So is this conversion process going to apply to just golf courses that were in business before this morato CHAIRMAN' STRAIN: It will apply to all golf courses. All golf courses. So whether they're in business or not. We have declining golf courses that are no longer in business. It applies to them as well; every golf course. MS.RUPNOW: fin talking--Pm referring to specific land that is adjacent to the subdivision in which I live that is permitted to build a golf course,but those of us who live next to this land--and it's being cleared under the guise of building a golf course,but we have reason to believe that's not the true intention of the developer. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The words are constructed. So the course would have to have some kind of permitting for the golf course or something,I would imagine. MR.KLATZKOW: I don't think that's what she's saying. What you're telling me is that you're concerned that somebody said they're building a golf course but they're really not going to be doing that? MS.RUPNOW: Right. MR.KLATZKOW: So the golf course has not been constructed. Page 38 of 46 January 19, 2017 8A CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. MS.RUPNOW: No. The land is being cleared,but the golf course has not been constructed. MR.KLATZKOW: The question is,if you're zoned for a golf course but you haven't constructed it, are you still part of the moratorium? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh,I don't know about the moratorium. You're not part of the conversion process because you wouldn't have triggered it because you're not constructed. So that's what it means. MS.RUPNOW: Okay. So thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And a PUD may have--it's the language-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're experienced with that,aren't we? We have a lot of golf courses. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: A PUD may have in its language to allow for the golf course to be constructed but it--there's always--if they haven't constructed it yet,there's always the option to come in and do a re-plat and eliminate the golf course issues. MS.RUPNOW: I understand that. I understand that. Thank you. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Which takes a public hearing and all the neighbors are notified and everybody-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No,not if it's internal to the PUD. They made-- if it's a PUD that has never really laid out a golf course and designed it,there's nothing to say that they have to build that golf course. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I've never seen a PUD that doesn't have some kind of wording in it that says we're going to build--to get the PIJD,You have to say I'm going to build a golf course or something. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We've had PUDs clearly approved that have now since evolved and decided not to build a golf course. Isles of Collier was approved with a golf course intent,and then when it came in for initial plat and final plat,it does not have a golf course. Naples Reserve is another one. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Naples Reserve,that's the one I was thinking of,but they changed that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah,that's the exception,not the norm, but there are cases like that. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. There are no other speakers. Anything--any members of the commission have any questions of anybody at this point? f (No response) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Caroline, I appreciate it. I think we're done with the golf course one. And I want to ask this panel what they'd like to do. I think we can finish this up rather quickly. We only have the preservation standards left. So I'd rather suggest we not take a lunch break and just finish right up,or if we get here past--if we're no .k4se to being done by 12:15 or 12:30,we'll take a short break. But I'd like to work through lunch if that's ok* COMMISSIONER DEARBORN:1 econd. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Third. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Caroline,that concludes the discussion on the golf course language. It's going to come back again for a final discussion on the 30th at 5:05 in the evening;it's anticipated to be final. So that will be at the point where we would leave the language in place,we'd recommend it to the Board of County Commissioners to proceed in their manner. So hopefully we'll be done with it by then. So okay. I can't take questions from the audience,sir. Now we're going to move on to the-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You can ask staff CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. You can ask staff members,if you'd like,Mike or somebody else. We can move on to the next item on the agenda which is the preservation standards that were presented to us as part of this. MS.CILEK: Let me pull up the amendment. Page 39 of 46 January 19, 2017 8 A CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By the way,Caroline,that was good information on Dark Skies. MS.CILEK: Oh,thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good read. Thank you. The contrast between the way the light poles are unshielded and shielded makes that understandable why we try to make sure they're all shielded,so that's a good move. MS.CILEK: Images are helpful. It's exciting what the county's embarking on with regards to lighting standards. Okay. The preservation standards amendment starts on Page 8. And I'll just do a little recap for you. This amendment was brought before you last year following board direction to look at the endowment payment amount for Conversation Collier lands both for the monetary option and then also for the land donation option. So this should be somewhat familiar. We were working with you-all,and you provided the recommendation that,more or less,you wanted to promote on-site preservation rather than offsite preserves. So we went back to DSAC and CCLAC and worked with their subcommittees to put together numbers that would promote on-site retention of preserve lands. So I have staff here with me to help answer any questions. The narrative should be very similar to prior amendment--prior amendment regarding the endowments;however,we did work with DSAC,and they actually suggested that we take a look at the initial section to the offsite,which is the applicability,and work through that and really kind of tweak it to meet the original intent. My experience with working with Summer has been that she has to reiterate the idea behind what is supposed to go offsite when that is being asked,how much land should be able to go offsite. And so the initial LDC amendment is addressing that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. How do you want to walk k = = it just as far as our review through the narrative? MS.CILEK: Sure. You want to go through the narrative or LDC'Sction text language? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's see if there's any questions on the narrative first,then we'll move into the text after that. MS.CILEK: Perfect. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: In the narrative section does anybody have any questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Good. We'll move right directly into the text. MS.CILEK: All right. So what I was just dsussing was with regards to H.1.F.I,applicability. So here we're really guiding what should be allowed to' ffsite and took a look at the different criteria that one would have to meet to be able to goo and really geared it towards small preserves,small aggravated (sic)language. Yeah,small preserves `* CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's on '.or less. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT One acre or less,yeah. IVIS`.CCK: And then there's specific provision for PUDs. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Under the applicability where it says existing,are we that far yet? MS.CILEK: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes,H. It would be Line 36 and 39. Existing portion of preserves located within single-family platted lots. If they're existing,why are we even wanting to convert them?I mean, what's the basis behind this? What's the reasoning behind it? MS.CILEK: Sure. One is that this is an existing provision already in the code,so we didn't want to remove it,and that my understanding is that there are several residential subdivisions that were approved many moons ago that allowed for and,you know,identified the preserve on the single-family platted lots; however,staff feels that there's a small amount of preserve there and that they no longer need to retain it. It doesn't benefit the single-family homeowner or the preserve. It's hard to maintain it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mike,you're familiar--and it was before Caroline's time--Twin Eagles. Do you remember what they did? They took their lots and tried to find a way around the rules at the time,I believe,and included within the lots their longer and deeper sections of the golf course,and I believe even Page 40 of 46 4 $ 8A January 19,2017 preserves. How would they be affected by language like this? Because they did that to circumvent,I believe,their requirements at the time and still retain what they were supposed to. They did it in a different way. I'm not saying it was bad or good. But I don't want--I want to make sure that if that was a requirement to get to where they got,they couldn't come in and re-plat and do away with some of this. MS.CILEK: And I could have Summer speak on this as well. She's is here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. The easiest way to get to the answer is all I'm looking for. COMMISSIONER EBERT: It wasn't only Twin Eagles. Da Vinci and Olde Cypress also did the same thing. They never put in preserves,so the county made them put 20 feet on each property. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're just going to take away your backyard.- COMMISSIONER ackyardCOMMISSIONER EBERT: Well,it wasn't mine. It's a different d:y in there. I live on the preserve,so... CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Summer? MS.ARAQUE: Summer Araque,Principal Environmental: Otalis the record. So this is existing language,and I think we were trying to cleats`it up T your points are very valid. They would still need to meet the minimum requirement. So Audubon Country Club is actually a good example. That's a PUD. And they're somewhere in the 50 to 60 percent range on their preserve provided. So they're well above their 25 percent minimum. But there are certain lots in there that have strips on the back,and that's an example of one where lh could come into play. But I think the examples that you all have brought up are good examples to see how this would apply to those. So if we think about Twin Eagles,they would still haveM maintain their minimum requirement-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Overall. MS.ARAQUE: --overall. But we could kind of think through how this particular section would affect those projects that you just mentioned to make sure that we're not creating a loophole. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And it's coming back on the 30th,so between now and then,if there's an issue there,please just flesh it out and see what we need to do with it. MS.CILEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN; _AIN: Down under D.1,essential service facilities other than parks--this is from your exceptions--I wotld`like to sug we need to say essential service facility,governmental facilities. And I know that's existing language,bt,Mere's a reason Isar tat. We've got a lot of things out there that aren't governmental that are considered now essential service,and that's changing over time, so there's no reason we shouldn't be trying to keep up with it with the code. MS.CILEK: Sure.-We can make that change,and I'll take a look at the definition as well. And,actually,I was looking at the wrong section. I did want to mention that the intent that we're adding is under H.1.F,and there on Line 11, 12, 13,we are identifying that these can go offsite because they are small and isolated and less OAR an acre. I didn't read the full sentence. I was looking in the wrong area. CHAIRMAN STRADOlkay. The next couple of pages,anybody have any questions? CO 1 aNER DEARBORN: No. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Are you on Page 19 yet? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We could be;sure. What would you like? MS.ASHTON-CICKO: I have a requested deletion of the double--or the triple I on Page 19, starting at Line 3,because that's already covered under 9.03.07 of your LDC. So I would request deletion of that entire paragraph. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Where did you say,Heidi? MS.ASHTON-CICKO: It's on Page 19 starting at Line 3,and it's the whole paragraph under triple I. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. MS.CILEK: Thank you for letting me know that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I don't have any other issues till Page 21. Anybody else? (No response.) Page 41 of 46 January 19,2017 8 A CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Page 21 refers to a post-development value. I really think that's kind of unfair. And you and I have talked about this,so I would suggest predevelopment. MS.CILEK: Okay. So-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And we establish at what time frame in predevelopment that would be. MS.CILEK: Okay. One thing to recognize is that there are two different recommendations going on here;one is from DSAC,and the other is from CCLAC. I just want to bring that to your attention. They are different. So the DSAC recommendation is on page--starts on Page 19,and then the exact same language but with different recommendations for how to address monetary payment in the land donation for CCLAC is on Page 21. And we do have one thing we want to bring to your attention with regards to the CCLAC one. And I'm happy to revisit how the numbers were derived from DSAC,if that would be helpful at all. A little bit of that history goes back to the other amendment,so just let me know. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I--you know,what this is going to boil down to are the DSAC's recommendations,the Conservation Collier's recommendations,and then what we suggest as either one or the other or a compromise. And I was wondering,between now and the 30th,could staff lay this--I know you've got a table in here,but we ought to lay this out and figure out a way to simply understand it,because putting it in the text of the LDC and then trying to analyze it there just doesn't cut it very easily. MS.CILEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So I think it's going to boil down to numbers at this point: How we measure numbers,when we measure the numbers,and what those numbers are. MS.CILEK: Okay. We can put in the next packet the numbers of how each of these subcommittees arrived at the numbers. They start with the same one,but then how they look at it over a 20-year period is different. And we can try to just streamline it a little bit based on what staff recommends as well. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You know what you did in the architectural standards,when you had that--and Jeremy did that colorful table and he said, here's the standard,here' the standard,and here's the options or something--I forget how he worded it that was a perfect side-by-side comparison to explain how the language works out in reality based on the calculations. I would think it would help us get our arms around it. MS.CILEK: Okay. We can do chat. Looking at the recommendatio r the monetary payment for CCLAC,though,you did have a suggestion regarding a different appraisal option than what is here. Do you want to repeat that for me,please. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You're suggesting under CCLAC,a monitor payment shall be based on the amount of post-development appraisal.value. So that means the developer goes in,goes through the risk of getting all the entitlements,and they're rewarded by saying,now,that's the value you're going to have to use to do fileVeserve offsite when you sta0anning your project. C think that's a penalty,not an irel7$$ e.And I would suggest we look at predevelopment within a year's time of when the first DO is actually constructed--first construction tacked a DO on the site. For example,we have people in town Who have owned property here for decades and decades and decades,so it can't go on the time when they brought the property 40 years ago but certainly within a year,say,prior to the development period that they're moving forward with in which they're requesting the preservation;that entitlement period would be,, er than saying after you've gone through the risk of getting your entitlements, now we're going to penalize you for it by using that number. I just don't think that's the fair way to go. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Mark,I agree. MS.CILEK: Another thing to consider for this option would be just a set fee based on,like,the average cost of land in the urban area or the rural land grant,because they are different. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. And that--and you and I talked about that. That is going to have to be,though,tied to a nexus that's rationale. And one of the items we may want to look at in this analysis,sort of this table that would be a little simpler way to approach it,is look at the AUIR.And we have regional and community parks. We know what we pay in the rural area,and we know what we pay in the urban area. We ought to look at two standards for there. So if you've got a project in the rural area,your standard for contribution,if you want to just use--instead of looking at the appraisal route,this could be it. Urban Page 42 of 46 January 19, 2017 8 A area would be a little different,obviously. So I would suggest if we're going to tie it to a fixed fee,it's tied to a fee that we've established as valid,and we do that through the AUIR. MS.CILEK: Sure. Yeah, staff would be happy to prepare those numbers for you. Another thing to consider is that based on my work with Alex in looking at those numbers,it's very--for the urban one,it's very similar--the AUIR number is very similar to what her experience has been in purchasing that land. So we have evidence that that is even a more valid number based on top of how they get to that just from the AUIR process alone. So we can support that. It would simplify this process a bit.Appraisals can be a lot of extra work. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It would,and maybe that's why we should look at this option as another option. I'm more concerned about validating the value instead of just coming up with an arbitrary staff value saying,well,let's use 250,000 or 200,000. I'd rather see a valid--I mean,we go through a lot of effort in the AUIR to try to justify those numbers. MS.CILEK: And we can put that in the table for you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Those are a couple items that will give us some-- MS.CILEK: And then another recommendation just from a staff perspective--and I have chatted with Alex about this--is that in this 4.A,after the post-development appraisal value is discussed,we talk about a 125 percent would be the endowment amount far the monetary amount. It would be really great for the LDC if we could streamline it and just put one number forward for endowment for both*monetary and the land donation so that they're the same,and everybody knows what the endowment amount would be. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So instead of 125 percent,use a set value? MS.CILEK: Yes. And we could use the one that we can discuss in the land donation. That's what DSAC did. They proposed one standard endowment amount,and that way everyone would know.They're different. DSAC and CCLAC have different ones,but DSAC did propo ,one number so that it's easy to understand what you have to provide as the endowment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I have no--I think that would be a good way to start. MS.CILEK: Super. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: At least we'll look at it.I'm not sure what will fly,but we'll have numbers to look at. MS.CILEK: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Then--Patrick,you look like you've got a question. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Like you said,we'll look at it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER DEARBOIIIN: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah ie endowment is a little tricky because,generally,you know,if you'vegot to pay for maintenance and eremoval,not all parcels have the same amount of exotic infestation. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: That's a challenge. CHAIRMAN STRAINTo say everybody has to pay the same when you may have better environmental land,more refined environmental land,more value to it because it has exotics,we're almost penalizing them with the endowment,so... MS.CILEK: And,we have numbers to support how the number for the endowment was derived,and the number per acre per year is the same for DSAC and CCLAC. It's just after five years they made different assumptions,and so we can show those to you in a table. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: You're saying after five years-- MS.CILEK: I'm saying after five years DSAC looks at the amount that is needed to manage land differently than CCLAC does. CCLAC uses the same number throughout every year,and DSAC looks at it differently. So we'll be happy to provide the numbers to you so you can look at them. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Generally what happens,when you go in to clear initially for exotics,you get the Brazilian pepper that's 20 feet high. It's a pain. Plus,sometimes it's mechanical,sometimes it's stump-and-squirt operation. Page 43 of 46 . z 8 A January 19, 2017 What DSAC's saying is that after you do that,the continued maintenance has leveled off. I think the experience that Conservation Collier's trying to say is it's not leveled off as much as you think. So that's what we need to address. MS.CILEK: And we can provide you the numbers that Conservation Collier has experienced on a large parcel,maintaining that for several years,and that may help you understand what number to go with. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And you know who probably has some information they could gather on this is a guy named Joe Schmitt. There was initial--there was some really intensive heavy acreage done on a project he and I worked on that had a lot of exotics and had to go in be done both mechanically and by hand. And I am no longer there,so I'm not sure how the maintenance of that is going with the CDD that took over. But that would be interesting to see how their numbers look,Joe. I mean,it was probably before you got the CDD. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. That was all before I got there. But,I mean,that information's available. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't know if they're experiencing-that much of a high intensity invasion. I know when it got done it was gorgeous.It just came out really well It's just a matter of did it come back and what's it taking to keep it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We have other--I'm sure that is available from other environmental consultants,Tim Hall and others that do work right now. If we can--they could give you that average cost. MS.CILEK: And they work together to figure out the first costs. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Good. MS.CILEK: It's just the DSAC,with Tim Hall,looked at--or a different individual,sorry,not that individual. They looked at it,and after five years they made a different assumption. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Fiddler's Creek was a tremendous cost to--that preserve across from the spreader canal which was cleared,but it's been very successful over the years once they went in and treated it and no reinfestation. So that cost has been cut significantly. But the initial cost is heavy. MS.CILEK: Also,I'll say,when we provide the materials to you --which I'd like to go over the date in just a couple minutes--feel free to give us a call if you have any questions on them so we can help explain them so that you understand while you`t`h 'eviewing them,and ahead of the meeting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay `unds goo& MS.CILEK: One more thing,rf I may. ActuaU a couple more. CHAIRMAN STRAINSure. MS.CILEK: But under Page 22,for CCLAC we have the$50,000 endowment. That was actually a staff oversight in guiding CCLAC. We really wanted to keep with the recommendation of the previous amendment,and se'that would be a different number. It's a lesser number. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MS.CILEK: So we'll provide thatin the table for you to see,but that will be a change from that amendment. Okay. I thought I wot> o ask if there's anything that the Planning Commission wanted to recommend with regards to wh land is donated to. Currently it discusses,I believe,a government entity, and I wanted to make sure that d still what the Planning Commission believes should happen. CHAIRMAN STRAIN:' Well,I--I guess it depends on how you define government entity,because Pve understood there's been some attempt to have CDDs be able to be the entity that it's donated to. I would highly recommend that not happen.CDDs are stable in some regards until there's a recession. When there's a recession,they're no long stable. We've experienced that. We've had some CDDs across the state go out of business. I'm not sure that's the best way to assure long-term maintenance if they're no longer an operation. So we may want to just leave it governmental,and it just stays that way as long as governmental is not considered CDDs. MS.CILEK: Okay. I'll work with the County Attorney's Office if clarification is needed to identify what governmental entity includes. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Yeah. CDD is considered a governmental entity. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah,it is. Page 44 of 46 dimommemirm January 19, 2017 MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Who owns the areas like the Nancy Payton Preserve? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's Collier County,I think. That would be under Conservation Collier. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's Conservation Collier,okay. All right. That's what I'm thinking of,where you would want to add to those larger swaths of land rather than--where there's some benefit. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: There was a project that came through that wanted--that had to do some offsite mitigation,and it was a CDD project. They said,you know,instead of donating the offsite to government entity,they're just going to donate it to themselves. That's where the twist came in.That's why the question's come up,the first time it was attempted,and we're not sure if it's the right thing to do in regards to longevity and assurance that the property will always be perpetually maintained. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So there's no option to go into a panther preserve and buy PHUs in an approved--government approved privately-run preserve,land bank or something else like that? MS.CILEK: Sure. I'm not--I don't know,actually,but I think with this language--and it's--I will tell you what page it's on,and I was mistaken. It's not governmental entity. It's governmental agency. It's on Page 20,Line 18. I can have Alex speak on the panther preserve,but I think it comes down to,like,a general-purpose government agency or a specific governmental,and panther-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: U.S.Fish and Wildlife is always attempting to buy land to mass sufficient quantities of property for panther preserve,but-- MS.CILEK: That might be considered-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: --I'm not sure if it's Elly U.S.Fish and Wildlife or it's privately approved. I mean,it's like a land bank for wetland mitigation. Those are typically privately run. They're approved through federal agencies and permitted,but they are typically private run. What's the one up in Lee County,panther--panther mitigation bank. MS.CILEK: Right. I can take a look at that. And this was a question asked. I didn't do a bunch of research beforehand,but we can do that before we come back. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else? MS.CILEK: Let me ask staff if I';need to discuss anything else. Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No? 'y Caroline? MS.CILEK: I believe that's it for this amendment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Are thereregistered public speakers,Mike? MR.BOSI: None. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any members of the public here who would like to speak on this item? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay ' we know that these two are coming back on the 30th at an evening meeting,which we'll --that's an opportunity for the public to talk again on these. And with that,I don't think,Caroline,there's anything else we have on your item,right? MS.CILEK: Just a note. Just due to the short time frame of the 30th,we were wondering if we could provide you your packets 1 Wednesday the 25th. So they would be on that Thursday morning. CHAIRMAN STRAP` It's all going to be stuff we have already reviewed once,twice,or more. MS.CILEK: Yes,yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You guys okay with that? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: That's fine. MS.CILEK: Less time,but still a weekend. Staff just has a really short turnaround time to prepare the packets for you this time. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We've got three people now electronically doing this. Stan's electronic now.Joe. We are getting there. MS.CILEK: Thank you. I'm good. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Is there any new business? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's a pretty neat trick,though. A PUD donated to itself. Page 45 of 46 8 A January 19, 2017 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,that's why the question came up,Joe. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We have to preserve anyway,but we're going to donate it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't think anybody thought about it before. All of a sudden it pops up and they go,whoa,wait a minute. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. That doesn't sound right. Good catch. Anyways,I was just thinking about that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. It took a minute when I first heard it,too. I was like,wait a minute, how do you do that? So we've got no new business listed. There is no old business listed. Any members of the public here that would like to comment? (No response) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none,is there a motion to adjourn by Patrick? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Motion to adjourn. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion. Second by Stan. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Seconded. All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. _/ COMMISSIONER EBERT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. f COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're out of here. Thank you,all. There being no forOier business for the good of the County,the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 12:14pm. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MARK STRAIN,CHAIRMAN ATTEST DWIGHT E " % . CLE These minutes approved by the Board on ,as presented or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF U.S.LEGAL SUPPORT,INC., BY TERRI LEWIS,COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. Page 46 of 46 as Staff Report 8h AGENDA ITEM 9-4 , . er COlititY STAFF 10F4RT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNINP CONfiVIOSION FROM: GROWTH'MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT zoNINalvISION-ZOIORd Stity0$SEC:TON REARING DATE:, JANUARY 19,2017 SURIECTI 'PECIITION VA-PL20160001 31,142 TEADE-WINDS AVENIZ. PROPERTY OWNElt/AGENTt Owner: Rosanne Stone4eske Agent Matthelit L Jones Law Offige- L.Shapiro,PA Nancy ID.1Coeper 342 Trade Winds Avenue 720 0:041.dite Road North Suite 304 Naples,FL 34101 tSL 341G2: AEOWTRDACTION: To have the Collier County'Nato*etvatissio (0cP05.consider for&Valiance from . . - Section 4.02.03;A, Table 4 of the tend.Development Code(LDC),tx reduce the minimum tear yard accessory structure'a-OA*One:from 20 feet to$4$feet fbta smwnhig ixo1,sp‘pool4t0I, and stairs .oa•ttwAterttooticitiNtitititt tho,Re.aixiotti4,sw4e,=flonitrotsF-3)zoning&strict, pkoaltAtintOCAVIcalt The'sebjeotpropeily is located en Lot 1 L mock M Comets-Vitutiorttift Beach Estates Unit 2 subdivisions Oti-the 300h nide-OfTtatie Winds:Avenue,approximately 1000 feet west of Vanderbilt Drive in Section-29,Township 48 South,Range 25 East,Collier Poen*,Viorida,Ne location map ii the„field P,ftgeA PURPOSE/DESORL:PriON OP PROJECT: The Ompose of the petition istorequestaxeduction from LDC Sec1.ion4A2i.0),A3 gk,s>bitingliatthe minimum svi_on3ingool and/or'Open 0010W acce4a0W$01bok fOr*Atetfront lots is 24-feetiOhebthe swimming pool deck exceeds 4feet,lwileight above the top olf the,seawalL The seawall on this property is 331 feet mdita pool cieekthatis 9:9..feet, Thus,thepool deck is-4;59 feetaboVetlieseaWall;VOIlich 249 feet Ite4Or tbark WNW iS peottit1;ti4rtite 13) The applicant states that the pool and deck plans stihMIttisd to Collier County contained the pool,deck elevatim al:0 feet, The County issued a poet permit,PRED20160100761.01 With a.rear accessory setback of 10 het verges the required 20 feet The.aPPliealltiriltIlleswnxtnung pool,epa,Atttl.pool deck utOtigigto 1 -foot accessory Otbagr,TretP4irettlettS ettOnf011aY_*64404 On the beilifing.Termit.rather than itattgtiiiita-20404 accessory Setback,reqpirement.The peel deck encroaches, 85 feet into the Z0 foot setback and..the stairs encroaelv1,45 feet. VA-PL2O16l,iOiii8i,t4tTratile Winds Variance Pager 1'dr 711111111111111111111111111~111 8 A , ,. ., ii!E1315 0 in o tIiir tgC®cii 0 i sEE LL,tallimiN.m.Lia....ki _Now (21°- 'In®Ii IC1-'3 'mal!31® tili8 Kt 9 RI CI RE1 OM 1121. ICII Ell 1111 IS CI .ig EX 11111 DI 0:3 ai .® 'il YID ® t:),, m.a. trig: .ig7:.. itii 0 , pica ,,,,itiiiii., e uf s, _1 ct.131 ri a Firs T.IA., El IM ICI.30 0 , 0 *es s 4# .e 0 _,...w.-1E:11,® ____...11111 7,Ell ;lel V 01 g-- ' c , ‘11 iii, 1511" n ,re i. 4 mom`.. r, 4 i IA Iti .2T-114 01, • Er VI .gm.` i 03 ilii, 0 ill ' : 102' ptql , , co Q d 1 R . .. Lv.,. 0 0 'P3 t‘I 11° 1'14' t:t:;).--1- 4:1 6-4!. , _-.004 z Cl. A li 1- I ''''::-: : § ::-. :' , : 1( j ' a t. 1 i; 1fP ) r - Cti0 i:i :I ,.:,-,q. :,, tieA . I ..,-...-.1','. ..';'1:ztal: ,.._,___ 8 , -5.. .„. ,...„ . _, :. . ,,.., . . . ( \ .,...... ... .. -.1 :''''.---„,,. . . 1 : : - ,arf . .. . -. ., . : , \ . a . ....: ...... . ...-: ,' 0-, 1 ., .... -- ,,, ., , .,, . :: : - :. . ' . ., . . . .... , , ... .. . ... . .. .:1.. . ........ ... . .,-.,,,,,,.k. ',' ,, ,....::: - - ,. ...O .,... ., '4:lc:I,:.!• g . .. of 8A , : ( TRADE WINDS AVE. itiT 00 iGosic(c) eg- ,, . -- i .., ....--- r,,,...............--,-.7.8177.-- 41 - # - 0_ . et, i - fo..f.#14,414.10 pokrtA. ) I I - coT4a‘se 00 tv, , OttAAIL , . wee or pv t - , is ifistiT 3- 1111111iw.. 4 it414' . ...-: cs Ift „„_,..--......--...,,-...._—_,=..—le,..ttomomior.1.,•••=*..... .......Zit I Pi ,,:, • 1 tt, siseeox um, 7500(R) isoilcl. , .. owm - -- vital.,elys.A.291. ma mptitAkityttl.„. ..• 0 bR.Chiliv, : ArtimitkittiAl Our 1. tc mi,6,-; : te. 1.65 • • - - . , ,, -2651 r r4 ' •1.4.0" " 14.0 , a .4., .., .. . . t* I .a42. TRAPS *Nos Ave. LOCK .c.s.s. mouse. (under citris6:1 tu . ' Fitt FLOOR eLEV. +10,4 itil ' b U' 10- , Lt 20.5' *, -,, [1 ... . 1 4o*.. st: _ . . .... . . . 1 0 . . r• ',' ." - ' 4011' ; ft 4.-ittot. $tAwakil '-' ' '-' ''''' •--' ' AL0Att fad gjOt:i**- , ,..,- ..L_ ... , . , . __ _ " • — , I -9-* StelltiVVII 75.0.00?) na' 't.M1 "t Aft og.kk.1440,14 . . .s:i,g . lb ,-. '• '1OF attCY' Oatitli ; - ti-EK +0,31. tof W A T E R W. •AY A —0111.54;01*tifilibt211*20101-020044 by Li*20ft At*essary setback:lidmiNtit 011-11killtaingi Pansift 40,ft Athationtat ilitcroachmott by stiiirsmos 3.45 ft VA,P1_2016000t1131,"..,U2'Trade Winds Vatiarice , .,.. , . .„ Age 8A , . 1 0 so' 4*IOW ALUM.PENCE 1 ,--- Aster Party f ___ WALL CAP - I 1414" si i 1 ...._........_.. ...........,* AP*..... ....A.m... .1.01•111019.1,01.. 15.0011‘1 75.0/ tle "it - in PET Mu i.t,*.t4 *4 itqop OF age. ffAIVALL NAV19 SAY +03.3Z According to the survey, the applicant built the stairs 3.45 feet into the erroneously provided 10-foot setback. Per LOC 4.02.01.D.7 stairways Shall not protrude over 3 feet into a required front, side, or tear yard of a single-family dwelling;the Stairs Were approved at.the 3445-foot encroachment. Please note that the building permits,for both the home(PRBD201506I7253)and the pool,were permitted with inclusion of the-stairs—as*doted on the surveY.Overall,the applicant requests to reduce the setback from 20 feet to 6.55 feet, This petitionwasoriginally scheduled to be heard by the Collier County Bearing Examiner on October 27, 2016. Because of increased public concern, in accordance with Section.247 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances,this matter is being heard by the CCPC for a recommendation to the Board. SURROUNDING LAND USE&ZONING: SUBJECT EARCI1L: Lot with a home under construction)zoned.RSF-3 North: Trade Winds Avenue ROW,sows Which is a single-family home,zoned ItSF-3 East: Single-family home,zoned RSE-3 Sontill , Canal off Vanderbilt Lagoon,across Which is a single-family home,zoned ESF-3 West: Single-family home,zoned RSF-3 _.. (.. VA-Pi,20,16011181,342 Trade Winds Variance Page 4 of 7 8A GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN(GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located in the Urban Residential Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed Use District land use classification on the County's Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The purpose of this subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned facilities are concentrated.The GMP does not address individual variance requests;the Plan deals with the larger issue of the actual use. ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing,which are peculiar to the location,size and characteristics of the land,structure,or building involved? Yes. Per the applicant, the pool shell, retaining wall, and stairs are constructed. The applicant commenced construction under building permit, PRBD2015092870601, with an incorrectly permitted rear accessory pool setback of 10 feet versus the required 20 feet. The applicant used the incorrectly cited rear accessory 10-foot pool setback for the swimming pool,spa,and pool deck. The stairs offthe pool deck do encroach 3.45 feet into the erroneously provided 10-foot setback;however, they were also permitted with the swimming pool,spa,and pool deck. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property,which are the subject of the Variance request? Yes. The applicant applied and received a pool permit from the County citing an incorrect rear accessory pool setback. The applicant utilized the erroneously approved setbacks unaware of any violations.Due to this error,the subject structure is currently encroaching 6.55 feet;more specifically, the pool, spa, and pool deck encroach 9.85 feet, resulting in a 10.15 rear yard setback,and the stairs encroach 13.45 feet,resulting in a 6.55-foot setback. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? Yes. Per the applicant,the pool is already constructed and to abide by the required accessory 20-foot setback would require the applicant to remove the existing pool, redesign, and replace it at an estimated expense of$50,000. The applicant relied on the erroneously issued pool permit with a 10- foot rear accessory setback in constructing the existing pool structure and stairs. d. Will the Variance,if granted,be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure and which promote standards of health, safety, and welfare? No. A reasonable use of the land does not necessarily include a pool; however,the applicant relied upon the County-issued permit.Reconstruction of the pool to correct setbacks would create a severe economic hardship. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands,buildings,or structures in the same zoning district? VA-PL20160001181,342 Trade Winds Variance Page 5 of 7 8 A f ' Yes.The applicant will be able to retain a decreased accessory rear yard setback for a pool deck that exceeds 4 feet in height above the seawall.However, it should be noted that the applicant relied on the County-issued permit which cited, incorrectly,the accessory rear swimming pool and/or screen enclosure setback. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Land Development Code,and not be injurious to the neighborhood,or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Staff has received objections to the requested Variance(attached)which state that the reduced rear setback would impact neighboring views, and set a precedent for future variances, among other objections. However, because a reduction in pool deck height of 2.59 feet would permit the pool to legally comply with the 10-foot setback,and signatures of no objection from property owners within the most impacted area were received,and because the setback was the result of a County error,staff is of the opinion that the variance will be in harmony with the neighborhood to the greatest extent possible. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves,lakes,golf courses,etc.? Yes. The applicant states that variations in seawall height in this location do not create a uniform height for all houses and therefore create different pool deck height requirements over 4 feet of the seawall. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Approval of this Variance will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth Management Plan. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report on December 30,2016. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission recommend approval of Petition VA-PL- 20160001181,342 Trade Winds Avenue Variance,to the Board,with the following condition: • Upon demolition or destruction of 50 percent or more of the structure's assessed value, this Variance will be void and any new structure shall meet setback requirements at the time of issuance of a building permit. VA-PL20160001181,342 Trade Winds Variance Page 6 of 7 8 A f PREPARED BY: 4111t,„ 409 ,(414" FRE CHL,A1CP,PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISIM REVIEWED BY: ilt*a RAY Mei :vV. BEE LOWS,ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING .SION - MIKE BOSI,AICP-,DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION APPROVED BY: —1'7 JAMES FRENCH DEPOTy DEPARTMENT HEAD - , DATE GROWTH GEMENT DEPARTMENT DAVID S.WILKISON,DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Tentatively sened4e0 for die-Fet0:017 140...41:1000.Meetilag. VA.PL2oi 60001181,wires iNtrgts Wan:0e 8 I-, RESOLUTION:17- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR A VARIANCE FR ECTION 4.02.03.A, TABLE 4 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REDUCE. THE M IIMUM REAR YARD ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK LINE FROM 20 FEET TO 6.55 FEET FOR A SWIMMING POOL, SPA, POOL DECK AND STAIRS ON A WATERFRONT LOT WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY (RSA`-) ZONING DISTRICT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 342 TRADE WINDS AVENUE, HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. IVA- PL20160001181J WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida:in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes,has conferred on allcounties in Fl rida the pow to establish,coordinate, d enforce zoning and- such'business regulations as ere°neceasary for the protection of the public;and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Lid.Development Code (LDC) '(Ordinance No. 2004-41,as amended) Which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County,among which is the granting of variances,:and WHEREAS,the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals:bas held a public hearing after notice;as in said regulations made aril provided,and hassidered the advisability Of a eta rt from Section 4.02.03.A, Table 4 of the Land Development Code to reducethe minimum rear yard accessory structure setback line from 20 feet to 6.55 feet for a swimming pool, spa,;pool deck and stairs on a waterfront lot, as shown on the attached Exhibit *A'1, irt` the Residential. Single-Family (RSF-3) Zoning District for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have bei ,inade concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with gin'. 9.04.04 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County;and WHEREAS,.all intercsted partieahaVe been given opportunity to be heard by this Beard in public meeting assembled,and the Board havingconsidered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED-RY THE BOARD OF ZoNIN0 APPEALS OV COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA that: Petition Number VA-PL20160001181, filed by Jason Jenks of Jenks Builders, Inc:: on behalf of Roxanne Stone-Jeske and Nancy D.Koeper, with,respect to the property hereinafter described as; (1 C1'1 l573/1310611/l]40 keit,t t0t1 Petition no..J'A-FL201.60001181 1342 radewinds.Ave. .. _ ,. , ., , 8 _ , , , 1 i , LO,i, 111 Block M, CONNERS VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES, Unit 2, •, L according to the plat thereOf recorded in Plattook 3,Page 17,Pdhlio Records of Collier County, Florida. 1. Folio No.27585200007 be and the same hereby is ppmved for a variance front Section 4,01.03,A,Table 4 of the Land Development Code to reduce the-minimum veer yard accessory structure setback line from 10 • feet to 6,55 feet for a swimming pool, spa,pool deck and stairs oh a waterfront lot,as shown on the attached Exhibit nA",itt the zoning district'Wherein said propertyis located.. . BB IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes Of this , Board. :. This ResOlution adopted after illation, second and majority vote this day of $.2017. ATTEST: BOARD'OVIONM APPEALS . .., 1)WIGH1'E„BROCK,CLBRIt COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA at. By: „Deputy Cie* Penny Tailor,Chairman , Approved as to formancl legality: suil ft Scott A. Stoll‘ • Assistant County Attorney • • 1 Attaeltment: Exhibit A—Conceptual Site Plan . .. . 1 .. i i 1 I 1 i1 1/6-01.1.-01- 7311,00.41.1.4/4! J110117 Peritiiii-ko. e44,4,20-049oltot I$.4111.#40:gi***0,. 1 "tioNtr t 1- _ i _______._. . ... 8A .._ . ... _ Exhibit A { BOUNDARY SURVEY OF LOT 11,BLOCK'M',UNIT No.2,CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3,PAGE 17.OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS,RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD. 1 TBM1215'(8) 1215.12'('M) c FD.RN N8t DISE"MA 3667" O O.tt'W.,NAVD ELEV.+•Mee tq FD.,TAIL tN MAT.ED MOM /'� (TRADE WINDS AVE, / ,---• 760'00 760.07'(C) _ _ ILI p"_-' -75.01' - 1 11 FV.Ptt NMI IN VVMT. ` i X0.0' I i i 60t•NR.B,0.06 4/•• '`P5 NAM RAW t EDGE OP 1'VM IN FYMT.EDT- oq IIIb 0 ia o f/1 Na 12^R.C.P.J -^4T �Wy na 6 596'04'10"W 75.00'(R) T5.01'(C) CPN , W If FR4S'P6 .... OWM FIR456.3ZS.,0.2E. ,,,,,,1 g• •PM3No.1)W. OF(511.81.OOT - . ) M a171 Q} M q 2 I Q O•-• T.6S'1 24.0' m m 14.0''r 765' 'pp > LeV v, AO. Ci • kw ;n w 9.0' a N v 4 X42 TRAD.F WINDS AVE. B 10 C K M C.6.s. ROUSE (under const-.) w • FIN. FLOOR F_UEV. #10.4 t' o g CD is 20.6' M NOTE' m Y tn 2.05', PER CONTRACTOR,POOL/PATIO h G. 14 15.0' S STEAAWALL. IS AT 4 ,ax ELEV +05,3 �` ---0.B' n > 12 �`'-` 10 SET DRILLUOLE a A • IN FOP Of CONC.*MALL- 59.7' 4'N1b) NAVE 01W+03.31 us.1 (.EJ.RETAINING WALL t- ALUM.FBNCE 0.6.4.srAl c . S'WIDE CONC.9EAWALL CAP' 2 ..t.114' 1 f. o SEB'04' Ia'W 75.00'(8) 75.51'Oh) ..i 7E7 PRIL.LNO6B • '• INTOP OF LONG.9EAWALL tr NAVD eLAV. 4.05.32 W ATER W AY SCALE:1".--20' anp.r..muscat t>OMRDI,rote BEARINGS BASED ON:F TICAVF 0/1NP3 AVE.AS S9E04'10'w,PER MU PUJ 0.s •15 0915 02$ 9010.92 VACANT/NAVD QLov,t y.Nu. "M").oC. ELEVATIONS BASED ON;NAVD 4880(ORIs.ON K DNR CGL 28 1089 05µJ DATE ORDER FLELO BOOK REVISIONS an-�c�it tYY LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE;AE Na') 6.19.16 0616015 'Colo.52 I'OuNLTATION/EL6(c52Tsow.7 , TIONR PER F.LR,M, DATED;5.16•2012 12021E NOON 1216008 C010.52 9TBMWAt.L EI.EV N y,.:•,•,~ON. .;H CERTIFICATE 0 1 1r•* eat*, GA Un ober• MNIM esteem et)'.'''6 CT-'•P-SOIL) rInerV o Ivd wny medrr lv me 'ut y VALID VD Mout eupu.fdon ma mwU go R.rdMm aenf o Hewlade a twl tolls by Ow norl0r [acrd o`( ONLY r Fmres2pn�y lend![camps In Ch9J-174Foo Y•1T04EF4. .S't WED Aal(�1NNNrMM Mt-. b aMlen 47L 7 EledMo WIN OMNI SURVEYS, INC. „le: 4nb�"ter s 41 ro.Jr•�.nd, ENBOaSED - I�R im►uMN ew�,e�h han • nwn!W SGL WM p401(" ollq.of ML•1,1241:14;4"=.1"1.11.V3,4"ay. .1t'0 'Ry) L8 6684 I ..1;,,,.'i,1''' - ( I FAX(439)839-7181 i'"; '.(10.4 in 1 Seo Mafionke,PS 1 ` 46E8 71LTON COURT FORT MYERS,.F_t..33007� .,n.,. ,Ftorldo Rty1■truNaA Na 4010 6" 'A lir; 't Craialliy COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 wvAv.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-6358 PROJECT NUMBER To be completed by staff PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED = Name cif APPncant(s): • J ; Address: 531 Turtle Hata,bane Naples St ate:-Finrida —— Telephone: N/A Cell:239-450-1.930(N.koecter)Fax: NIA E-Mail Address: oycgirli_459©aol.com Name of Agent: Maittz Mope°,FactoWeliesAttached/Odin/Rol Aulhortzagcs1L.... Firm: Mare L,Shapiro.P.A. Address: 720 Goodiette Road North,Suite 304CIty: Naples State: Florida ZIP: 34102 Telephone:239-849-8050 Cell: Fax:N/A E-Mail Address: rdoneseattomevshapiro.com BE AWARE THAT COWER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGUCATICN4S. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITHTHESE REGULATIONS. 5/4/2014 Page 1 016 8A • ....c., . . . , ,ctosito Loi COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.collleraov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 ibeneidewthrtailertiesei-description-of the property coveretby the aPplitationi (If ipace is ...—...,_ inadequate,attach on separate page) .. Property I.D.Number: 975R52Ontlf)7 Section/Township/Range: 2it /...AIL /25_ Satitftithiaivaapor's Vanderbgtlpitob 14bAers _Unit:2 ' Lot:_i_i_,..Block:Ad_ Mataalkiletnakerescrhdielp ..., ..*......... Lt. 4.4.1.21.+1.,i,r. Total Acreage: -21 ing bile. : thereof — ,;.. • ,, :.., 3, ' ,, 11,Public Records of , 4° -114 ft Of fillatilet Property: " 11,2.. A L.L.t,‘*,...5 A./: tLo.. '-' - ' Eisbstett i i . * . , i,,, ,i...... : , ! Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: 30' Corner Lot: Yes 0 No lid Side: 7.5' Waterfront Lot: Yes IT No 0 .1 Rear: 25' Chapter 8 of the Administrative tiodONNittfretr'Tharfthppiggio wog ramp*60 Wag rr hearing advertising sign(s)after final action is taken by the Begt401 County CminlaiOotteni. Based on the Board's final action on this Item,please remove all public hearing advertising stn(s)lalmecnatalV. ,.. Li t 6/4/2014 Page 2 of 6 . 8A i.. , , COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colilergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Compte_tbe_follawingfor-all-registered-Assoc-iatian(s)-thatcould4be'°affected-bythicretittt -- Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at htto://www.collieraov.nettindex.aspqparre=774. Name of Homeowner Association:j -A Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address. _ City: State: ZIP: i Name of Homeowner Association: .! Mailing Address: , : .. _ City: State: _ZIP:, i. r" _ i araeofHoirteowner Association: 1; Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: , , - City: State: ZIP: tOn a separate sheet,attached to the application,please provide the following: L I 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers,i.e.reduce front setback from 25 ft.to 18 ft.; ;; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include ,; building permit number(s)if possible);why encroachment is necessary;how existing encroachment came to be;etc. t 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02,provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a '' 1 variance petition by the criteria(a-h)listed below.Please address the following criteria: I a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size I and characteristics of the land,structure,or building involved. l • k 6/4/2014 Page 3 of 6 . . 8 A I . , •:ice ..0co 4.,,,.......,.. .„,.....p COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.collierRov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land,building or structure and which promote standards of health,safety or welfare. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands,buildings,or structures in the same zoning district. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code,and , not be injurious to the neighborhood,or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g) Are there natural-conditions or physically induced conditions drat ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves,lakes,golf course,etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the fast year? ❑Yes g]No If yes,please provide copies, i i i i t 1 t t. V } 6/4/2014 Page 4 of 6 1 ) 1 ) 8A . , , . 1 ...‘,... 1,i ,„. coginty Li COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 i 1 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 , ..- The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal,the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items In the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete subm'ittals will not be accepted. - . - Completed Application download current form from Cou website MillinniniltialliMMO• ' - Pre Application Meeting Notes 1 .„. : • • - .. Project Narrative 111 a a Completed Addressing Cheddist ' 1 Conceptual Site Plan 24"x 3V and one 8 X"x ir copy at a a _.. .. _- _ ....-7:___._............,.._„_ ,...,._.,,,,,. , ..0,,...... .,...e showln:theencroachMent, easurediremec - Ps .. , ... ...._,„..._............. ',Affidavit of Atithorijation,signed and notarized 2 ) • _ • Deerls/Legal's . _ 3 N NI Location map • 1 Pi MI Current aerial photographs(available from Property Appraiser)with project boundary and,if vegetated.fLUCFCS Codes with legend 5 0 0 included on aerial ... Historical Survey or waiver request N I - Environmental Data Requirements or exem'don"ustification 1111101111MIIIN I Once the first set of review comments ore posted,provide the assigne. 1 . -,.planner the Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification ., Electronic copy of all documents and plans ,. .421001.110461tTheaffittottitellieering Examiner requires all 1 0 0 ,. mebetebbp be ihreehted eleabegkelhrie PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff,the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. . 4 E E 1 1 g. 1 4 i c. 6/4/2014 , Page 5 of 6 f i 1 8 A 1/4.) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.coiliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Planners:Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following reviewers: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: ❑ Environmental Review See!pre-Application__. __e _ -__._. . • • -Executive-Director-_. ..._W... ..... • Meeting Si:-in Sheet ■ Addressing:AnnhaMl+ nt I Graphics:Mariam Ocheitree 0, City of Naples:Robin Stiger,Planning Dtrector. II Historical Review ❑ Comprehensive Planning:See Pre-Application Meeting Sign-In Sheet ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District • conservancy of 5WFL Nichols Nan Parks and Recreation Vicky Ahmad Cae mot It :l4eld1Ashbe TrimsporptiortPathwayuariceYfv ❑ Emergency Management:Dan Summers;and/or 0 School District(Residential Components):Amy EMS:Artie Bay Heartlock (l Engineering:Alison Bradford C f Transportation Planning:John Podczerwinsky 1:1 Other: [J Utilities Engineering:Kris VanLengen ❑ Pre-Application Meeting:$500.00 ❑ Variance Petition: o Residential-$2,000.00 o Non-R ct , •00 o Sth and&Ampere Review-20%of original fee 0 Estimated LegalA*6rd**reefer the Office of the flearbtainandnert 5.00` ❑ ACTe Fact ZoldneLand Use Petit:2x the normal petition fee ❑ Listed Species Survey(if EIS is not required):$1,000.00 All checks payable to:Board of County Commissioners The completed application,all required submittal materials,and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN:Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples,FL 34104 Is/:Marc L.Shapiro December 16.2016 Applicant Signature Date MAn.:I Shi • • p Printed Name • l 6/4/2014 Page 6 of 6 8 A . I. (BACKGROUND) As part of the construction of a single-family residence,the Applicants' general contractor, Jenks Builders, Inc., submitted plans, including various elevations, for a building permit and approval of a swimming pool and swimming pool deck located behind the subject property.1 The plans were approved and a swimming pool permit was issued. After completion of the work and after numerous inspections by County building officials, a neighbor contacted code enforcement and alleged that the height of the swimming pool deck above the adjacent seawall was violative of the LDC. Specifically,the current LDC mandates that a swimming pool deck be no more than 4' above an adjacent seawall. The seawall in question is at 3.31' NAVD. Four feet above this height would 7.31" NAVD. However, in its current configuration,the swimming pool deck is at 9.67' NAVD and thus, the swimming pool deck is 2.33' higher than allowed by code. LDC Section 4.02.03 A, Table 4 provides that in instances L ' where the swimming pool deck is more than 4' above an adjacent seawall,the rear setback be a mini•mum of 20'.Thus, •the Applicanta are requesting a variance to decrease the rear setback form I s 20'to 6.55'. II. (LDC Section 9.04.03,Subsections D,E,F and H Criteria for the Granting of Variances) 9.04.03 D The variance if granted will be the absolute bear minimum required to effectuate the project. The variance will make possible the reasonable use of the land and structures located 'Given the property's side setback dimensions,the swimming pool deck stem wall and swimming pool shell had to be constructed and in place prior to the construction of the house foundation. Page 1 of 2 8A thereon. There will be no violation of standards regarding health, safety or welfare to any neighbors,adjacent properties and/or the public at large. 9.04.03 E There will be no special privilege conferred upon to the Applicant should the variance be granted. An examination of the surrounding properties indicates other properties with similar Additionally,the only alternative available to the Applicants is to remove and reconstruct the swimming pool deck and swimming pool stem wall. Given the interplay of the swimming pool stem wall,swimming pool deck and the foundation of the residence,this would be a very delicate project and would cost a minimum of$50,000.00. Such a situation would have a significant hardship on the Applicants and would constitute economic waste. Importantly, the situation the Applicants find themselves in is not of their making but rather,is the result of an innocent mistake made by county building officials.The swimming pool and swimming pool deck were repeatedly and properly permitted and approved as were all pilings and piling caps on which the swimming pool deck is built. 9.04.03 F If granted the variance will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of the-LDC.-Na neighbors and/or their property will be injured. Although there has been a complaint by property owners across the canal and several house to the West,no harm will befall them. Their line-of- site ine-ofsite is already obstructed by serval very large pool cages and any objections to the granting of the instant variance is simply not accurate and is disingenuous. Attached hereto is a letter duly signed by seven separate neighbors(on both sides of the canal)noting their respective non-objection to the Applicants' variance petition. 9.04.03 H The granting of the variance will not be inconsistent with the County's Growth Management Plan. Page 2 of 2 8A The Law Offices of • MARC L.SHAPIRO 44, MareL .Shapiro,RA.. i NATALIE STAROSCHAK SEAN WHALEY 720 Ooonurra FRANK ROAD Nom,Suns 304•NAPLES,FLORIDA 34102 Nrouss:(239)649-8050.Fon Miralts:(239)418-0010 FAX:(239)649-8057 WWW.AtIORNEYSHAPIRO.COM December 16,2016 • VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO fredreischl@colliergov.net Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Department 2885 Horseshoe Dtive South, Naples,Florida 34014 Re: Variance Application PL20160001181 Connor's Vanderbilt Beach-Estates Unit 2,Block M,Lot 11 342 Trade Winds Avenue Dear Mr. Reisehl: The following information and/or comments are provided in response relative to Ms. Rachel Beasley's August 8, 2016 Insufficiency Letter (hereinafter referred to as the "Letter"). Pursuant to the directive set forth at the end of the Letter,the information herein is responsive to the various Staff comments.The various responses and are set forth in the same order as denoted in the Letter.For your easeof use and reference,I have excerpted each departmental comment as • set forth in the Letter. REJECTED REVIEW: GRAPHICS-GIS REVIEW REVIEWED BY: JESSICA HUCKEBA CORRECTION COMMENT 1: Incorrect parcel number,should be 27585200007. The Initial Vigilance Aititinn Application(hereinafter referred to as the"Initial Petition") colgablectialil 'cOrtitetlattolJj cation Number in the Property Information section.This has beet nonadeel,kilte Flt kagad Variance Petition Application(hereinafter referred to as the "Amended Petition")which has been provided herewith. CORRECTION COMMENT 2: This should be RSF-3 for N,S,E and W. The Initial Petition juxtaposed the Zoning and Land Use designations as set forth in the , .. I I Page 1 of 1 8A ,... • ..., ,, i,....i. ,. .,. Itry` 'I -:,-..:.,-7....::f ; . . , ..--- 1 . , 1 - 1 t i i f 14* , r 44 144V, Alb' u...... 41 — *-- ' i I " t • I t I 1 5 • 1 I I i f '' 1 i I f i i 1 , 1 I t Li i r I i t http://maps.collierappraiserx,,. ,,,, ,,.•,`, . °1.,,•• 14' eitle_2016.fide03124449406320.jpg 6/15/2016 . I , 1 i 8 A 1 Mr.Fred Reischl,AICP December 16,2016 Page 2 of 5 Adjacent Zoning and Land Use section. The juxtaposition has been corrected in the Amended Petition which has been provided herewith. CORRE_ ION_. ONT , ---This-is-the STRAP number,should be metes and bounds description. The STRAP number has been deleted and the full legal description of the property is set forth in Property Information section of the Amended Petition. RKI ONM(EN Map should be legible;also thut Ake location is too far East.Parcel boundary should be outlined. A revised site map taken from the Collier County Property Appraiser's website is provided herewith.The revised map sets forth the parcel boundaries. copmzeozdpitowir l lM. The Amended Petition has been corrected to provide the correct Block designation REACTED REVIEW: ZONING REVIEW REVIEWED BY: RACHEL BEASLEY • CORRECTION COMMENT'1: Correct minimum yard setbacks for subject property::non-waterfront side yard setback is 73 feet and rear is 25 feet.Please note 2 things: 1.front yard is correct and 2.the rear is not 20 feet—this is because the 20 applies,in this case,to accessory swimmingpool decks that exceed 4 feet in height above top of seawall. The Amended Petition now sets forth the correct setbacks. CORRECTION COMMENT 2: Please be consistent in measurement,more specifically l0ths of a foot. For example,in the Narrative of the Petition,you switch from decimal measurement to feet and inches. All measurements in the Amended Petition and the Narrative has been corrected to reflect measurement in decimals. 8 Q Mr.Fred Reischl,AICP December 16,2016 Page 3 of 5 CORRECTION COMMENT 31 As noted in County Attorney notes,please note that this is a variance from the required rear Yard setback of 20 feet for accessory pool decks that exceed 4 feet in height above top of seawall. Thus,keep in the description the narrative describing the height difference between the permissible 4 feet above seawall which makes the setback 20 feet rather than _ .l0. t,...Thus,you are requesting a rear yard setback from the 20 feet to+x.-feet.- A revised Narrative has been provided herewith to indicate that the variance requested is in fact for a reduction in the rear-yard setback as opposed to a height variance for the pool deck. CORRECTION CONTg� What is the Measurement for the pool deck stairs to,the seawall?What is width of the stairs?If the stairs are wider than 3 feet than you must request the rear yard setback from the stairs and not the deck itself. The measurement from the outboard wall of the pool deck stairs to the:seawall is 6.55'The stirs are 3.5'in width and thus it is understood that the requested rear yard setback must necessarily commence at the outboard wall of the pool deck stair's. REJECTED REVIEW: COUNTY ATTORNEY REVIEW REVIEWED BY: SCOTT STONE CORRECT *N CO I The Property Appraiser lists a e onsets as ' _ ``' and Nancy D.Koeper, as joint.tenants,"so please update the'App11000Coiftitet littornuttiiir section of the The Applicant Contact Section of the Amended Petition now states that the owners are Roxanne B.Stone-Jeske and Nancy D.Koeper,as Joint Tenants with Full Rights of Survivorship. CORRECTION COMMENT 2: Please also provide an Affidavit of Authorization from owner Roxanne B.Stone-Jeske,or other signed written evidence that she agrees/consents to this petition. Affidavits of Authorization from both Ms. Stone-Jeske and Ms. Koeper are provided herewith. CORRECTION COMMENT 3: Your application indicates the minimum side yard setback is 7'.However,according to LDC Section 4.02.01 A Table 2.1,the minimum side yard setback is 10'for waterfront lots in the RSF-3 zoning district.Please have staff correct me if Pm wrong.Otherwise,please revise your application with the correct minimum setback requirement. Staff has indicated that the correct side yard setback is in fact 7.5'. 8 A Mr.Fred Reischl,AICP December 16,2016 Page 4 of 5 CORRECTION COMMENT 4: In your Project Narrative, under#3 please provide more detailed responses to criteria (d),(e),(t),and(h). A more detailed Project Narrative regarding the criteria for the granting of variances as set - in. .9.04.03,Subsections D,E,F and H is provided herewith. CORR"1 . ., . . thiestial tit poor pre-app,you are a variance from LDC Section 4.02.03 A, 4 le rethice the ffitothaist rot yard accessory structure setback line from 20 feet to 10 Wit'ot,poo "thot height above the top of the seawall.However,your tPrOleet e you are seeking a variance for the pool height. ilealle reviseyour narrative to correctly and clearly indicate that you are seeking a variance from the setback require NOT the height requirement. As noted in the Respose to Ms.Beasley's Correction Comment 3 above,a revised Narrative has been provided herewith to indicate that the variance requested is in fact for a reduction in the rear-yard setback as opposed to a height variance for the pool deck.; t ', SON ' t :s 1 6 Please provide a cleaner,more legible siteE an t at'clearly labels the seawall,and shows the exact measurement A the pool to the seawall. A more legible site plan with the seawall labeled and the exact measurement from the pool to the seawall will be provided under separate cover. CORRECTION COMMENT 7: Please confirm with staff whether the rear setbackshould be measured from the pool deck,or the stairs(as indicated on your site plan).Please also depict and label the 20- foot rear setback line to demonstrate where the pool would have to be located in order to meet the minimum setback. Staff has confirmed that the rear setback must be measured form the outboard wall of the pool deck stairs:A revised site plan to provided under separate cover,will depict where the pool would have to located in order to meet the minimum setback requirement. CORRECTION COMMENT 8: The Warranty Deed you provided is not the most recent deed for this property.Please provide a copy of the most recent deed that accurately shows the current owners of the property. A warranty deed dated December 10, 2015 reflecting that the owners of the property are Roxanne B. Stone-Jeske and Nancy D.Koeper,as Joint Tenants with Full Rights of Survivorship is provided herewith.The Warranty Deed was recorded on December 22,2015 as Instrument 8A P E Mr.Fred Reischl,AICP December 16,2016 Page5of5 Number 5209385 at Official Records Book 5226, Page 989, et seq., of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida. CORRECTION COMMENT 9j wase probea copy of thebuilding permitlpermit number for the pool.— ____ A true and correct photocopy of the building permit for the pool is provided herewith. CORRECTION COMMENT 10: Additional comments may follow receipt of neat resubmittal. No additional response by the Applicants is required at this time. REJECTED REVIEW: ADDRESSING-GIS REVIEW REVIEWED BY: ANNIS MOXAM CORRECTION COMMENT 1: On Conceptual Site Plan-Thelegal description is incomplete.The Block is M and Subdivision is Conner's Vanderbilt Bch Estates Unit Z. `-'' A revised sit plan is provided herewith.The site plan includes a full legal description CORRECTION COMMENT 2: On Application-Property Information-the Parcel ID number is incorrect(it has one zero too many).Metes and Bounds Description-What's provided,that's the Strap Number.. The Amended petition includes the correct Parcel Identification Number and additionally,contains a full legal description of the property. 1 believe the foregoing adequately answers the various concerns of the Insufficiency Letter. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any other question or concerns you may have. Very truly yours, Matthew L.Jones its , , , 8 A , , . , .. AV1T.Ot:AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) 0 r\ > (title,if I' , ,i„, . 4,...;, (print name),as applicable)df .., � � -),swear or affirm __.:.. (company. Mend that:oath,that I am the _ )tmrar�ar .r 1 epi. . s ' and restrictions on 1. I have full authority to ure the approval(s)requested and*Impose =,bythe Cr ° _. in accordance with this the referenced ; •, . as a result of any action approved py t _ ", , .., - ,. supplementary matter 2. All answers to the .,= in this application and anysketches,data or § upP attached hereto and a part of this application are honest and true; working hours 3. I have authorized the - ' of Collier County to enter upon the property , ' 9 normalon;and that for the purpose of ttt , ng and evaluating the request made through --."opfothe conditions end 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided } restrictions v" ,,. _ '4 ' .'' ;as our/my representative5. Well authorize t,.._--t,.._-- .� ' ..' � above. v. _ r in any matters , : . this petitiorn�ng- 7.°",`. r -9. t.. ''rte s'ocs i 'a L• i o-'°" *Notes: • if the applicant is a corporation, It is usually executed by the corp.pros.or p the documents should • if the applicant is a Limited company(L,L.C.) or limited Company(LC), typically be signed by the _ °Managing Member." • if the applicant Is a partnership, - typically a partnercan sign on bake Nor the . , • if the applicant is a limited., : 1p, then the general partner must signand identified as the general partner'of the named part • If the applicant is a trust,then must include the trustee's name and the words trust e. • in each instance, first E- .. the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, ' _' ' partnership, end then kini use the appropriate format for, ownership. Under penalties of perjury I that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of ,oninatitid that tine-facts ststedLiry.ltar..e tr4ue.. . , _.._ lox , k `'STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER , ,to .)and subscribed before me on - . ,JP ► ti , by F.e'," (name of person f d or affirmation), as _ :;. Who is personalty known "rte or ., _ o as = (type of identification)as . . ,- of 1 otary ,' STAMPISEM. 041(10‘01101* '. 10$064 8A , i 1 0 , .. _ AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) "->1-.201. + �` i ` " i (title,if r Gr, w ,Cacti, itis,. (print name),as 4f1 r {. swear if affirm i, (company,if : . ct pi . .:` - �I that: under oath,that I am the(choose e) • :, and restrictions on 1. I have full authority =r , :;the approval(s)requested and to Imposehr, • and a restrictions won't on i' as a result of any action approved by the the referenced _ _ ... or ' e'sup---- enfary matter 2. Alt answers to the , ,; .- in this application and any sketches,data attached hereto and`;", ' . a part of this application are honest and true, 3 < ,m normal working hours 3. I have authorized the of Collier County to enter upon the property the purpose of .,-'ting and evaluating the request made through ,-- application;and that 4. The property will = transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided ; to the conditions and restriction$. '4 E t F, Y I !, $ ! , 5. Weas our/my representative Wen :°�•, ,1 < :, �: � � , ',4 i � rm ,...2 above. in any matters ' "> i (jg 'I L L. ',t-•4.,.re'Not• the applicant is a corporation,' ?° �.J• s.or v.p =, t' is usually execUt�d by the coria.preC .the documents should • if the applicant is a Limited Company(LLC.) or Limited Company(t. ), typically be signed by the . , i a girtner n sign on behalf of• if the applicant is a partnership} , I4' p • If the applicant Is a limited ; , Y, then the general partner must sign and . Identified as the `general partner°of the named , . • If the appifcard is a trust,then , must include the trustee's name and the words tns ee'. ship, and then • in each instance, first Y .the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, pa use the appropriate format for ownership. LI Under penalties of perjury,I . that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of , • and that the facts hi i STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me � .f� - • s a a who Is.1,".....4„....,,e _to Yah OFo of lf7 Ets .4 - 4 a.. 'L ,. . $TAMPISi:AI Aaik-- • • fit of Notary P Ue II. I CP108-coA.8Ol 1SS REv 3124/14 ,. 8A I k 1 1 , -,BOUNDARY SURVEY OF t LOT 11,BLOCK'AP,UNIT N .2 CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES,AS RECORDED IN , -PLAT BOOK 3,PAGE 17,OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. I SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS,RESTRICTIONS AND RESERyAT1ONS OF RECORD. --.........rid. 1°1 TBM ..,, tV.Pg 14&WV'PSOA 3867" IV,' CR) 1215.12'(IA ; 0.11'W.,AAVP eLEV,4-p248 i Aratri- 1 AVE. TRADE WINDS neat) isit.drz) ,,,,,V4W-144rt" 1 ram — ‘ st ; -- oulacmumumir miumuitn.77-ffilimii, == ChM 13 .r, 1 i 588'04-'1O-W 15.00'CR/ 75.011C) •1` -:RI i -.4.F. -. I. .,- ir • CO 1.w - es 2 LLII 41 1 - x .. ). tx;- - -..: si • '' 0,. tz. - - • C4 . r --.... , tn , r 1 -. t I „e42 TRAP, WIMPS .AVE„ - _ BLOCK aas NOOSE (under cSL,)- i , , ILI ttoo•-- i I • Fir4. FLOOR ELEV. 4104 0 Lo f U' uN NW NOTE -T - ; , , .... tor ' , MN CONTRACTOR,POOL/PATIO - - *- ' i •-• - J ._.., , -STEMWA11-1S AT - -; ' ' ' ELEV 4-09,9 12 , 10 SET txttu,ilate . , • ItMstilt 4,11C.%NALL407 4'ulfg !AWE=4231 a 7ALUM.MAO .... :„. , , .. 5,..54,„„w .70iiirtt) rif11 . . 5v-t requi-LhoLE o/'Tor ,..- WATERWAY .. - OF LONC,5FAIVALL 4 !MVP ELIN +032 SCALE:1"'=20. iliiirir-M;VEIMIJIL:-'7';'377r1-""•-'+ :; crOwleaven.--i."---•' "tat1.4400brvItillislagt:s416FIst7t;41°K1V4FEtftsRier. '' IMIIi.X1F2t4.7.6ril 0444-152 17 4,71`r1.7;1-74 T„,r,„,;ii : t 15's ., ..I'V . •.• , - - ”4. ....,.. ,...- . MIN Mal* .• 0-$1,MIZEMUi-c.,...-4=7,- - - ' 1 ' - ,, ','' ''' • 11.11111.111111111111=11111111111111111111111111111101 :1_ .'s• -' . ' -- - V lc , ., - -' .:,a_ < . ,,. OK? OMNI SURVEYS,INC. stAL . t - .. 1 '''..11 Va' ' 4 - --Nr , . ,Z.3/*'-;,:7-,4t. .-'- • 1 - 1 - .. 8 A Collier County Growth Management l am writing to you about Petition NO.VA-PL20160001181. Codes and easements are in effect for a reason.30 years ago Homes in anderround i t Beach nwere single story, Back walls of the Houses were 30' away from the Sea wall and n. The area has progressed from Single story,to 2 stories, now 3 stories ( Max Height allowed)to rear set back to side set back. Home builders are building homes so big they are not allowing but 10'for a pool and deck.This is their choice to do so,now I see decks and pools trying to exceed the current set back. In this instance the pool and deck have already been constructed. I can understand if the deck exceded the set back by a little due to a miscalculation by the survey. But this is a gross error and not a minor setback violation 13.5'. But let's not overlook the height violation also.According to code the deck and pool cannot be over 4' above the seawall. This wall is 2'over the code, and with the water bowl pedestals over 3' above the code. I do not expect the home owner to know these codes and had trust in their Architect and General contractor's. There were at least 2 permits pulled to address this code. A permit was needed to build this house. The architect and General Contractor of record should have had the elevations on the signed and sealed plans submitted to the county.The architect and General contractor has the responsibility to know the building codes. A site plan, signed and sealed had to be submitted to the county with setbacks and elevations to the county. Whom ever did these plans has the responsibility to know the codes. A permit was needed to build the pool.The pool contractor had to submit signed and sealed plans to the county with elevations and setback dimensions.The pool contractor has the responsibility to know the building codes. I see many new homes going up in our area with every new home pushing the envelope to the max.I feel we cannot allow these violations to be approved. If so everyone will be attempting to seek a variance to do the same. Steve Emens Homeowner 331 Lagoon Ave Naples Florida 34108 8 A ReischlFred From: BeasleyRachel Sent: Thursday, October 20,2016 10:42 AM To: ReischlFred Cc: BellowsRay Subject: FW: 342 Tradewinds Variance FYI Original Message From:George Marks (mailto:GMarks@kramermarks.comj Sent:Wednesday,October 19,2016 7:11 PM To:BeasleyRachel Cc:Steve Emens Subject: Re:342 Tradewinds Variance Rachel, Thank you for sending all of this information. I have spoken to a land use attorney concerning the "Precendent setting" issue of mine. As I feared, Florida law has allowed "precedence"as a basis of future variances. I will review the plans with you tomorrow at 3:30 in person just as a double check, but based on what I heard from the attorney we have no choice but to oppose the variance on the basis that one can not create their own hardship(by installing the pool improperly)as a basis of a variance.Additionally,since such a variance would be a basis for future variances,it regrettably does not give us an option if we wish to prevent future similar variances. See you tomorrow. Thank you, George E. Marks,AIA Kramer+Marks Architects 27 S.Main Street Ambler,PA 19002 215-654-7722 off 215-870/5543 cell >On Oct 19,2016,at 2:00 PM,BeasleyRachel<RachelBeasley@colliergov.net>wrote: > j >Good afternoon George, > Per our conversation, I attach the Staff Report and the site plan. > Best, > I > Rachel Beasley >Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mall to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 8 A f t ><STAFF REPORT 342 Tradewinds Ave.docx><Site Plan 342 TRADEWINDS >AVE SITE_8-22-16.pdf> • • • • 1 1 I • q3 ti 3 2 8A Arthur"Buzz' Victor 312 Lagoon Avenue Naples,FL 34108 buzzsictoriggmail.com October 23,20.16 M .Rachel Beaaley,Tlanner Zoning Div..ision Cel3ierCminty,„.crow&Managenient 28,00North HorseShOe Drive Naples,FL 341,08 RE: Zoning Petition*.VA-P1,20160141,342 TradeWindaAve, Dear Ms:Beasley I on inveceillt of The information sent to me as 4 1140, by pxopetty,owrtexxegaxclir*illeaboVOrefeteoced honing'natter, Unfortunately,I am unable to personally attendthe heerifw and then asts*tor my oppositionto the variance via this letter. itilasbeen eleven yearssince I built my'home on Lagoon Avenue,but I er the processvery WèlL 'Ibere,wereany lumber of design features that I wouldhave liked to construct,but I found myself constrained by the applicable codes and theirrestrictions..Those limitations were imposed for thelpod of Elie as a vhole. White,lothe-preserit cftumsterice it is aehame that gonstructimhas proceeded.too-point witereitis oo4.7. to remove it.and thetft ink:action:4 were nitSseaby tl*COntrolling authOrity; Ibis1 however,lane rat401140 simply waive requiretnerits with which the balance of the neighhorheod has hati-JO won?* I hopethet the Board hearing theca*imiliiequire compliance with the code. Thatis titettr4100 ;ecioie4 Siocerely, \t- Mkt=lluzeNiotor 111.111111 .- 8 A i Letter of Petition in FAVOR of 342 Tradewinds Variance October 2016 . 1 Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners 1 i VVei the undersigned neighbors of 342 Tradewinds within the impacted:area respectfully submit thetwe have NO issue with the pool mance being requested by The new home under construction will raise the home values In Our areal which Is what any homeowner would welcome, and we do not contest the pool variance being requested. We are NOT an agreement with Mr. Marks and Mr. Evens in their Position regarding the view or the style of the home and therefore submit that you approve the requested variance from 342 Tradewinds by ms Jeslo and Ms KcePer Respectfully. , Address i Signature, 4 1100, - it( 4 71#1 O' i if 4 #14.1 S4' /.00'...°. I14 /1 _ $catic' 1 -5- ii.19.460,..? er e r 101-0,A Y 6tettrtli ./ ' iheadifid 3 g Aito., occr gi 4 07. .iieboeca43 A4/€ 0,.. „. bicAk 7 /taco /Iv .5 ‘... . . L canner , ,--4.-1.--7-7----tri:-.;:iv‘waw ,-„war,,,,v,k,,,,,,, - - - - ---. . -,,t1-,:'4- . '•- ', , ' ''' ”` 8A Cristina R. Marks George E. Marks 319 Lagoon Ave. Naples, FL 34108 October 20,2016 Ms.Rachel Beasley,Planner Zoning Division Collier County,Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34108 RE:Zoning Petition No VA-PL20160001181,342 Tradewinds Ave. Ms.Beasley, Thank you for taking the time on Thursday,October 20th to meet with me and review the Variance application for the petition noted above. After some thought and evaluation and conversations with other affected neighbors,we have no choice but to OPPOSE the request for variance for the sole purpose of defending the integrity of the existing"View corridor"which would be negatively impacted by the approval/granting of this variance by Collier County. We oppose this variance as it will impinge on the view corridor that currently exists and will encourage future violations by potentially creating an actual hardship for adjacent property owners. The violation of the required setbacks by 13.45 feet horizontally and 2.36 feet vertically is a GROSS violation of the zoning ordinance. The applicant has NO BASIS FOR A HARDSHIP and this violation does not qualify as a diminimus violation by definition of law. The required setbacks in the RSF-3 zoning district as per Collier County Land Development Code(LDC), Section 4.02.03.A Table 4 states that the minimum setback for an accessory use(swimming pool in this case)when the elevation of the pool deck exceeds 4'-0"above the seawall shall be 20'-0". The current placement of this pool encroaches on this allowable setback by 13.45 feet which places the pool deck within 6.55 feet from the seawall when 20'-0"is required. I have reviewed with you the Staff report and analysis in great detail and disagree with your assessment as noted below: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing,which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land,structure or building involved? The evaluation of any zoning or building application is predicated on the review of the site PRIOR to the construction of any permitted construction. No certificate of occupancy has been granted for this property,therefore the evaluation of this request for variance should be as if the building did not exist. Collier county failed to uphold the zoning code in their approval of the building permit and plans,however,every building application contains verbiage that puts the responsibility to comply with all building and zoning codes on the architects,engineers,contractors and property owners. A county created situation is not a basis for a variance. Mistakes happen all the time and the county should be upholding their responsibility to enforce the correction of the violation. It is clear that NO SPECIAL CONDITIONS exist as a basis for this variance. 8A g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves,lakes,golf courses,etc.? There are NO natural or man-made conditions negatively affecting this applicant. The staff's consideration of the applicant's argument that the variance in seawall heights is a legitimate consideration is seriously flawed. The applicant's seawall height is the highest level allowed by FEMA and is a standard set by Collier county. The variance in seawall heights is not a consideration in this Instance as the applicant Is already relying on the highest wall allowable and is still in violation of the Zoning ordinance. The current condition already exceeds the maximum allowable seawall height by 2.36 feet and would only be worse if a lower seawall existed,which is not the case in this instance. h. Will granting of this Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? The staffs contention that the granting of this variance will not violate the Growth Management plan which is based on the zoning ordinance as a basis of the plan is negligent in the staff's assessment. Granting of this variance will be a GROSS violation of the zoning ordinance which is a key basis of the growth management plan. In summary,the granting of this variance should be denied on the following basis: 1. No legal hardship exists for this applicant to rely on as a basis of this variance and the variance must be denied on this legal basis. if the county makes the argument that they created a hardship for the applicant,which would be legally flawed,the county would be self-serving in thereby granting a variance to correct their error. 2. The pool design could have been constructed AND CAN STILL BE CONSTRUCTED in the current location with the exact same dimensions within the zoning ordinance by building the pool 2.36 feet lower and a variance would not be required. It would be negligent for the county to grant this variance when a viable solution was and is available to the applicant and the county without creating a hardship. 3. There were no existing special conditions or circumstances that would contribute to a hardship and thereby the variance should be denied. 4. The fact that the applicant states that it will cost$50,000 is not material to the consideration of this variance by law and the granting of this variance would confer permanent damage to the visual corridor of the neighborhood that the zoning ordinance exists to protect. 5. The granting of this variance will confer special privilege on this applicant not available to other property owners and would create/necessitate future hardships for adjacent property owners. A variance is not intended to provide special privilege on any property owner in violation of the zoning ordinance. 8 A • I gelsobWrocl From: went Fantegressi<Vfaritegrosseaol.COM> Sent Monday October 24„2016 11 40 AVI To. 'George Marks' vanderbiltbeach54@yahooxon ReischlFrect;„,BellOwisRay Cc: 'Steve Emens'; 'Buzz Victor';'Gail FantegrosSO;gbraddon@rodhester.rr.cem;,gry8761 ga0com;jpwood99@aol.00rn Subject: Rt: 3-42 Tradewinds Zoning Variance opposition assistance-Vanderbilt Beach Residents Assoc Good Morning Mr.Reischl and Mr.Bellows,: lam writingmectio-Mt marks"cont about the possibility Of a Variance being issued in the TracieWinds matter. am most concerned about precedents he ingset, The entire Vanderbilt Beach area is in transitionIt is clear that older, Stnallerhettaingliwentory Will be Steadily reOltiCediti the coming)fearethro4htear-downsend new-construction. We all haVe-abldedbilOgrzoning rules and it important that rules and regulations are weakened by allowing unwarranted variance& My limited experience with the county Inspection and regulation process has always been positive and I have been Impressed with the attention to detail thecounty giveto all projects Lam confident that when twenfuhdellberation,eVeryonewillagree that the rules in place were established with good reason and should not be taken lightly or disregarded, Thank ye..fOrVPMrOIShlarattOn; Vincent V.Fantegrossi ';.2S4 tmotin Ave. liiaPlita,ft„34108 Mobile:$17-680-1125 1 1 8A Building Permit Application And Permit COLLIER COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 8A Growth Management Division I 2800 N.Horseshoe Drive,Naples,Florida 34104 TEL: 239-252-2400 Please fold plans with the plain side out. Ensure documents are stapled inside each set of plans. trIt'() j,r 2 Units(Single Family/Duplex) 0 Residential 3 or more Units(Multi-family)0Commercial Permit Nor - /e - f TCT 17 ��3 Master Permit No. 0ontractor DDesign Professional Downer Builder Parcel/Folio: 2:7 0 7 0000/ 4f� R p P Job Address: Z- ( R]� Dck, kJ O License#State Ce eg.-Prefix:(- Y #: 0 Q( 1 et-( 9 cl7 1-* �P Owner's Phone No.:`�3 q-s-la, -(O zj,� (e Company Name: CO• S o 2�'S o Vf 1 LIC— �© L Z S r4} 5 V E T12. 0 Qualifier/Professi al Name: pep, S+o v24 v 6�O Owner's Name: �ls° ��^F 1 ��1� ULt� �� Lot: Cr Block: Unit: "Z_. y p `- � Contact Name: O Subdivision: C 9IVh/4.L V�al/d r!V b i �l fiCik gO Address: 1 1 c00 i e C t S Vki PO Township: L Po Range: 7X--Section: IA Z Ud City: n ( f; State: P l Zip: j Y I 17 h FEMA: BFE: Flood Zone: �4 Phone a q-7'Yf-115 2- Fax: 23q'5-q G-(b 3S E. SDP/PL: O E-mailAddress: 112(.LT l U Code Case: COA: DAlteration DMechanical pClean Agent System DLP Gas ZfConvenience Book DMobile Home OFire Alarm DPre-Engineered Fire A nNew Construction fsnFire Alarm Monitoring (Suppression I H Door/Window l Plumbing , ,,F'',,, DFire Pumps Standpipes DElectric/Low Voltage (Pool C DFire Sprinkler System (Spray Booths ;.z, w DElectric from House [ Re-roof W W DFossil Fuel Storage System DTents O a —_Screen Enclosure p. p, DHoods Underground Fire Lines W BFence Gas _Shutter F-, H DMarine flSign/Flagpole OTHER (Solar ') D Private Provider n Plumbing z DNon-sprinkled f lSprinlded [4> 0 Electrical F+ 't -t D Roofing � '• �`'- IA IB IIA UB ArZ U D Septic Low Voltage pW a� D� DIVA DIVE �> D Shutters D Mechanical 12.4., E, D D , z 0 Permit by Affidavit O VA vB !`Ji_., O U '+ Occupancy Classification(s): i n ) Description of Work: U 0 VVI C ii Wh 0 l 4- 1A o 5 E �Wive,L-l< �.o GU Ai i rt4 tit,! t f- bt li 1 Vl A,At LAIR-- © w1 C(2Aw vo vt'wtip f 't itA/T P-(4 (,1.eAid C. 1I cif td"" O C � 9 F I I, ( Declared Value$: coot Project Name: `�� W t '✓dt f a+ ALTERATION WORK AREA- SQ.FT. O NEW CONSTRUCTION/ADDITION AREA 40z F If applicable: #Stories/Floors:_ #Units: #Tons: Z�DU RESIDENTIAL: U #Bedrooms:_#Baths: Living: Non-living: O RESIDENTIAL: Living. Non-living: Total sq.ft.: TOTAL SQ.FT.: A+ COMMERCIAL: Interior: Exterior: COMMERCIAL: #Fixtures: Interior: Exterior: Total: TOTAL SQ.FT.: SEWAGE: w 0 Septic D Ave Maria OCity of Naples D Collier County 0 Golden Gate City D Immokalee D Orange Tree 0 Other E. WATER SUPPLY: -a D Well 0 Ave Maria (City ofNaples D Collier County D Golden Gate City 0 Immokalee 0 Orange Tree DOther Application/Plans Discrepancies-Customer Acknowledgement of possible rejection for the following missed information: 1.Square footage discrepancies 2.Occupancy Classification/Construction type not provided 3.Required documents not certified 4.Incomplete Plan Sets or Drawings 5.Sets not identical Nov.1,2014-PMR Date: (o Days Review: # Set of Plans: QUALIFIERS PAGE Qit\ , . IN at, Mt gi ACKNOV1LEDGEMENT OF COLLIER COUNTY REGULAT1ONS Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. The permit or application fee may have additional fees imposed for failing to obtain permits prior to commencement of construction. The approved permit and/or permit application expires if not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance. The permittee further understands that only licensed contractors may be employed and that the structure will not be used or occupied until a certificate of occupancy is issued. By signing this permit application, I agree that I have been retained by the owner/permittee to provide contracting services for the trade for which I am listed. Furthermore, it is my responsibility to notify the Building Review and Permitting De partment should I no longer be the contractor responsible for providing said contracting services. I further agree that I understand that the review and issuing of this permit does not exempt me from complying with all County Codes and Ordinances. It is further understood that the property owner/permittee is the owner of the permit. Note: If change of contractor, please provide the following: Permit Number: E-mail Address: Tel: COMPANY NAME: CO- �k°VZ-VF a10AAS L L4-TATE LICENSE NO: \g ,4% `ll V t k g ` Y C k - ,ems ^ -o o/ ......- QUALIFIER'S NAME(PRINT):X O Y' Se Y C. 1 QUALIFIER'S SIGNATURE: ®� Q �— STATE OF: ..A.. COUNTY OF: ce,u I f A, 1 AM. - f I SWORN TO(OR AFFIRMED)AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS 0 �' l C7 ; l• . °`'�"'� R.A.IIAIIDAZIO _ Notary Plubk•Stals(*Florida � / . s My COMM.18099 AIre 10,201! ' WHOO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN: w OR AS PRODUCED ID: `- �:�', Commission/FF 120832 Sonde"Through lltlaml Malty kW TYPE OF ID: -.v.. -.-1.-se.wPmergiroSPRIIPINIPM NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: 0,,_,- ...40-117-- (SEAL) NOTICE IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT, THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROPERTY THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY, AND THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL PERMITS REQUIRED FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES SUCH AS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT,STATE AGENCIES,OR FEDERAL AGENCIES. WARNING OF POSSIBLE DEED RESTRICTIONS THE LAND SUBJECT TO THIS PERMIT MAY BE SUBJECT TO DEED, AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS THAT MAY LIMIT OR IMPAIR THE LANDOW NER'S RIGHTS. COLLIER COUNTY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THESE RESTRICTIONS, NOR ARE COLLIER THESE RESTRICTIONS. TY THE LANDOWNER OR ANY APPLICANT ACTING ON BEHALF OF THELAN OWNER TOPLOYEES AUTHORIZED TO PROVIDE LEGAL OR BUSINESS ADVICE CAUTIONETHE PUBLICO SEE KnRELATIVE PROFESSIONAL ADVICE. WARNING ON WORK IN COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAYS THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALL ATION OF ANY STRUCTURE OR UTILITY, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND, WITHIN ANY RIGHT-OF-W AY OR EASEMENT RESERVED FOR ACCESS, DRAINAGE OR UTILITY PURPOSES. THIS RESTRICTION SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITS FENCING, SPRINKLER SYSTEMS, LANDSCAPING OTHER TH AN SOD, SIGNS, WATER, SEWER, CABLE AND DRAINAGE WORK THEREIN. IF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS ARE NECESSARY, A SEPARATE PERMIT FOR THAT PURPOSE MUST BE OBTAINED FROM TRANSPORTATION/ROW PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS(239)252-8192 WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OOFF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE MPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Per Florida Statutes 713.135 a Notice of Com mencem ent(NOC)is required for construction of improvements totaling more than$2,500,with certain exceptions.For A/C Repairs or Replacements a notice of commencement is required for improvements more than$7,500. The applicant shall file with the issuing authoritypriorto the first inspection eithera certified copy of the recorded NOC or a notarized statement that the NOC has been filed for recording,along with a copy thereof.In orderto comply with the state requirement,permits will be placed in inspection hold until proof of the NOC is filed with the building permitting and inspection department.The issuing authority shall not perform or approve subsequent inspections until the applicant files by mail,facsimile,hand delivery,email or any other means such certified copy with the issuing authority. 8 A , ROUTE SHEET Performance Review Residential Permit Number: PRBD20150617253 Permit Type: Demolition Submittal: 1 1 Initial Submittal 06/02/2015 Submittal In Person Method: 12 I Fast Track: Simultaneous: Master Permit#: Sets: Private Provider: Expedited Review: Planning Project: Business Name: Job DEMO WHOLE HOUSE, KNOCK DOWN, BREAK UP, HAUL AWAY, LEAVE ONLY CLEAN Description: GROUND AND GRADED CLEAN FILL DIRT (COMPLETE DEMO) 342 TRADEWINDS AVE LOT 11 Details: Fire District: 11 North Naples Fire Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date Final Review 5 Day Review 6/2/2015 6/9/2015 Time FEMA Review 6/2/2015 6/5/2015 t 4/fps- Residential / /is- Residential Review 6/2/2015 6/5/2015 Other Applicable Reviews: In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Review Date Entered by: stachuracarol Report Updated:12/31/2014 -Tania , ..n. 8A K _ __ _ __ 7 V ITs r — ro �L (` �ctti Jed tri. --� N I j \ { ``-_G - ., ,7 I ! s ?IIIIIIIII: — �� tn O ri ; OCIt �C� " S ram CO K - I‘ I 0 IV.. ..... coic, 1y;` ,rte { COQ N O +sr.i Ct r s 1 A ,,,, ,, „.,________ „. , , ,._ IIIIIIMIII I ,N j ',....r,Mi.. LI rI 1 I. t - 3 11-- �� - _ 5 n .r a g: ; z - x .n v .,:f w_ .0..--„.' 'W cp ( 0 T+•»1 a - , - i k 93 i 3 c 'x -' 'a ' `5 'j- t./' `� ro '' a i _ 2 7 ' .73 = 2 n o > p I n b n F I l \ m ,e m g sem, K I -I n I i I ` - -- - - - - - r --^�—- - - •� a' 1 l -- -.-r^ - _-'-� - ., I 4 ^ i I' S;` ----Z-'I'I -y---�-_----'7, b C C a c-J> z = _, b,LL S Z!¢S JI N 'p S s.o ll ` !11 _,Al r 3aK 7- ; T T. = i 4 .a orr - - g0 3 •3 - 30 Ic; i A- II . ``-.14,a r ` I 1 l -(- —r `41Z - � i 1: -1 h b& j. ' ' -- �^11 } 2 ' 1 •,, � R ., bi ^-;01 � I • ++ o It•n _ n =e .> c y, is ` i n 3 3 0 0 `Y l .�11h� , - 7 (• n o o_ !o o n 8 0 Z D.-t3 OI I • I.; --lii\jiV �hf 1 i _ -� 1 e r j s y s 3 O r T 1 r #tet .-a' ti 4 -`}T ,II '"' • q_ ' l.;_.' , ; # ({` �_•,t.. \r n , -- - ' • 1 ' ' ' 1 1 4 a_ i--, , t 'I' t-)6{I� { ' `:;i •-_ -._-- - . _ _—_ -. ..._--_—•_ ,-- -__..j.---, . •�----_;-,-,-t_.-1_-1_--�_b- 1 I ` [ I Y� "' a h `i q '' f r ..Q 1Lk ty N' , ��I ='� r I , - �'01,'� - JI ik:aNI y ti I • �f. n I1 • ?cl 1'� NI .1m I _ *•Tt •� ' 'Q oo`-� 'tq . S ;' '1- ` t.. I i I C e. �.7 n s1 e ' 4 z cn #P p; Q 4 1p „� c ��i' Loi' a µ 1v ` r� 4 /141 I \t �ti • [j .!lk rrii I I.. '�,1 •111► c ,[1 "-` + 8.:A ■■.■■■■. ■■■■■11■■■■■ • ■■ . , ,_ ._ 7_5 _ . , .................... ■ ■ \Ii * ,,, ■iiia■■■■■■ ■i■■■11 ■ i ■■■■ „ ,, ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■11I . . ■■■■■■■■■■■■■N■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 11.11■■■■ 1111■■■■■■1111■■■■N■■■■11 ■■■■i -.,. . :,. .,,, 1111■■■■■1111■■■■11■■■■■■■i■■■■■1111■■■■E& 1 cc ■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■_■■■■■■f :4 N■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N■■1■■■■ ■■■■■■� ■■■■■1111■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■•■■■■■■■■■■■3. "oris ■■■■■■11■■■■■■i N■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■�N ■i■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■11■11■■■11■■ ■■■■■■I o ■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■11.11■■■■■E■■■■■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■_■■■■■■■■■■ 1 ■ ■■ ■■■ ■■ ■ ■■■■1111■■1111■■11■ ■■■11■■■■■■■■■ggt ■■■■■■■■l■■■■■■i■■■■■■ ■■■N■■■■■0 1 N 111111111.111111111111111111.111111111111111111. ■■1111■■■■1111, 0 * 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ■■■■■■■11■■11- . ■.111111■■1111■■ • iiia■■■■■■■■I■■■■■■■ ■�■■ �■■�■� 0 • ■■■■■■■■■i■111111■■■ ■■11■■■■■■■■■■ ■■1111■■ m11■11■■■■11■■■ 1111111111111111111111111111111•11111111111111111 1111■1111■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■11■1111■■■■■■ ■■■■■■1111111111■■■ ■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■11111111■■■ 11■■■■■■■■■■■ , -1 ., „ 1111■■■■■1111■■■■■■ 111111■■ ■■■11■■■11■■■II ; . ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■111111■ A , . ■■.i■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■11■■■■■i■■■■■■■■11 ■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■NNi■a■11■■■■■ ■■1111■■11■■■11■■■■■■■■ 11■111111■■■■■i■■11■11 4 • 1111■■■iii■■■■■■11■■■■1111■■■■■■■■11■■■■■ 0 i■MO ■ an IMiiME ■ MMEM ■■■i■■iiia a s ‘0,4 ‘ ‘‘ tt * % V kV*c;k, \‘ A r4 * tG?' 5so 41 ( 4. \:. 2 . ,- s‘l ... g t , - ti,.ts.- 1'* \A‘‘ �wpo%'A kIN,I . D O., ‹\, .,h, -. 0 ,1, .?\z- r s . ( , 4 ‘Nt- i4, ?t, k ., Z1(\L rsc 4,: . 1 ' r' ‘ -.”' :- t fltN,' ;* ? c. 1: : ‘-- , .* S,z k i i , . . . . .: It.3 • ., 0 ' _- • 't °a. ': _ -tiv J k..-. k i;„ 1, '4,, t -. .- ,1 -.. Wlitk\I\ ;41:E-- '4) '' 11:\ ' ''‘`4.. ' : ': 0‘\ 4 '24 . lk: '-' iri Lif i . 1. ,?„'t/ ( ,2-, ::;. , '. ' ‘11. 1/4` ' si. A r DO Wt i v W 44 i f,-- r- l r , I - - -_ 1 IC_ m r � {n� r — t+.)w � � c f -'1 m r, 1 v s VI C o a{. _. ,-- _ . 1 oo i •-- I 1-- i f Un.... ...... n moi. I O—.--- p b r S � o M m 1 _! C _ gra D I .. , " HLH . -• -._•C' ` Z m r n W A f V/ N N 272 rn N -r to f& f 2 m n 4 N + U N t+�_ it113TE-Wifig4.1 g. © ffnn QQ .m _�. +ex} X I r- .ni �( � 17;a3"3 i 3 C m 4a 9 .„a-e i ----..-' n 3 a ; 'R = c N Cuuu::u' U... :: ■n■::: :■■:�:la:.." - > „a� ■ ■■■■■ ■■ ■■■■ ■■� ■■■■■■ ' g . ! ji ■■n■■■■■.■■■■u■■ ■■■wi�■■... ■■■■■■■ F3m it nQ • gHqc; m o f 411 I ni . � . " ■ ■ ■■■A ■■■1■�■ ■■■■■ii �■■■■■� 11111111101111"? ■■ . N. m h 12,.= ri. ' `. _ EuIuss _2 - ' MN , ■■■■ ■ ■ ■■■■■ U■ ■■ ■ 0 ■■O c'i;4,--Att§1115"- ' 1 F,' i i ii ; 1 , ' ir''r tr .n' c' 333 �R gq rtnf : : : i r' ann m ill* noD m o • _• rn 5 i _ ti m __ 93 � -- IMO ■■■�� ■` ■■■■■ ■■■�■■■■�■■■■r■■ ■■■■ ■ _� 5 § • NCB'. _ All■ _ ■■■■■ii ■■ ■■■■■ ■ .■■ •■■■ Q 1 rn _ 7 { Do `l� m cQ9 m o m 1ill c it: .--‘-- Ut4 1iik. , U4 z y - m j 1111.111; :: ll `goy- I0 ,t- ( 4, .. _ 2, n --.4--'—y---m c rni r LV - m r illi ~ 0 0 8A , , O m 2. 71 = m N 4 >n p ENE 0 oo 1 T. �, o 0 N' r 1 r EIM g;, io 71 s O i ! 0 ,_ . , . _ — - 4 . — - I r w 0 . - . It i ., . . . . . . .. V q,aA 4 1 ....,...,.,z„ 4 , m 7 8 N.),, r Lm ' v ,I N.4 n 0 m l' m i Collier County Property Appraiser http://www.collierappraiser.com/webmap/Map.aspx?folio=27585200007 Collier County Property 1Appraiser .eollierappraiser.com/webmap/Nlap.aspx?folio=287585A200007 .�. tNMO0HL11U'.h 7 FEE�ERCK I HEl➢- 5 "1 I tz 4/ a A 1T.1S —7-- Mr-S. LE 5/.14.1-1-. 'MEDIUM I URGE C-� 1 t.Q�tEtt CD�� '76:::46..-.+, z. y _ —_ fr !--147-:'-'‘-`%7 r - __,__ . .,-,,,,,ki7v:- g--.41--•--,-t, IMI - Zoom Out 1 . to .. rionwAiiimimisin �$ _ -,-T;. Ilk t •Introductions UM Search for Parcels by ! !. 4 .$t Full County a Search Results , View 40 Layers } +1)Legend 0 4. Zoom To dl Print Selected a Home Page Clear Map `` ', Graphics Help '- t' I - ;T.' ' { t Overview _ Aerial Year. 2015 f > "4 VA— ' '-—-NiLlipli. Sales Year. _ � � � 441 OFF ' ' -2"tiew-,-;-,.. 'PT511"462-..7 ,,_‘, ._,.,-t-0,_:__ . ° —O�bfti~ s gil Aerial Photography January Urban-2015-Rural-2014 1 of 1 6/1/2015 11:04 PM http://www.collierappraiser.com/Main Search/RecordDetail.html?F... Collier County Property Appraiser 8 A Property Summary Parcel No. 27585200007 Site Adr. `342 TRADEWINDS AVE Name/Address STONE-JESKE TR,ROXANNE B ROXANNE B STONE-JESKE TRUST UTD 8/10/05 531 TURTLE HATCH LN City NAPLES State FL Zip 34103-8538 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A29 233800 M 113A29 29 48 25 0.21 Legal CONNERS VANDERBILT BCH EST UNIT 2 BLK M LOT 11 Millage Area 0 154 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 233800-CONNERS VANDERBILT BCH EST#2 School Other Total Use Code 0 8- MULTI-FAMILY LESS THAN 10 UNIT 5.58 6.1776 11.7576 Latest Sales History 2014 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book-Page Amount Land Value $469,200 . 08/30/05 3878-2924 $0 (+) Improved Value $108,370 12/05/00 2750-3426 $ 549,000 (_> Market Value $577,570 01/19/98 2503-621 $0 - ( : 10%Cap $21,623 -- _.__ _ 08/01/87 1289-1542 $172,500 07/01/86 1206-999 $160,500 (_) Assessed Value $555,947 04/01/82 965-1203 $152,500 (_) School Taxable Value $ 577,570 (_) Taxable Value $555,947 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 1 of 1 5/28/2015 10:03 PM Details Page 1 of 1 8 A Print New Search Tax Bills Change of Address Property Summary Property Detail ( Aerial 11 Sketches ir Trim Notices 1 Parcel No. 27585200007 Site Adr. 342 TRADEWINDS AVE Name/Address STONE-JESKE TR, ROXANNE B ROXANNE B STONE-JESKE TRUST UTD 8/10/05 531 TURTLE HATCH LN City NAPLES State FL Zip 34103-8538 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit# CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type 1968 COUNTY 68-260 05/01/68 ADDITION, NO 1990 COUNTY 88-2531 PICKUP 1990 COUNTY 89-2244 08/20/90 OTHER Land Building/Extra Features # Calc Code Units # Year Built Description Area Adj Area 10 RESIDENTIAL FF 75 10 1968 MULTI- 2350 2350 FAMILY 20 1968 WOOD 100 100 DOCK ALUM 30 2000 SCREEN 588 588 PORCH 40 1978 CONCRETE 160 160 50 1968 SEAWALL 75 75 http://www.collierappraiser.com/Main_Search/RecordDetail.html?FolioID=27585200007 6/2/2015 8e4 SCC Meeting : February 28 , 2017 Agenda Item #8A - Petition : VA-PL20160001 181 Located at: 324 Trade Winds Ave. Presented by: Mark Shapiro House Plans (3) Layouts — Too large to scan and can be found at the Clerk to the Board' s Office, 4th Floor, Building F 8 A COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT#: PRBD2016010076701 PERMIT TYPE: PL ISSUED: BY: APPLIED DATE: 01-12-16 APPROVAL DATE:01-27-16 MASTER#: COA: JOB ADDRESS: 342 Trade Winds AVE JOB DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF 387 SQ FT IN-GROUND POOL& JOB PHONE: 5'8"X 5'8"ZERO EDGE SPA,3 HP VS PUMP- ALARMS(PRBD20150928706) 342 TRADEWINDS AVE LOT 11 SUBDIVISION#: BLOCK: LOT: FLOOD MAP: ZONE: ELEVATION: FOLIO#: 27585200007 SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE: 29-48-25 OWNER INFORMATION: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: STONE-JESKE TR,ROXANNE B ROXANNE B MORRISON ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION INC STONE-JESKE TRUST UTD 8/10/05 (DBA)MAC CUSTOM POOLS-ALUMINUM 531 TURTLE HATCH LN 1020 SE 12TH AVE NAPLES ,FL 34103- CAPE CORAL,FL 33990-- CERTIFICATE#: C33218 PHONE: FCC CODE: CONSTRUCTION CODE: 0218 JOB VALUE: $74,000.00 TOTAL RES SQFT: 0 TOTAL COMM SOFT: 0 SETBACKS FRONT: 30' REAR: 10'Accessory LEFT: 7.5' RIGHT: 7.5' SEWER: WATER: CONTACT NAME: CONTACT PHONE: Per Collier County Ordinance No.2002-01,as it may be amended,all work must comply with all applicable laws,codes,ordinances,and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit.This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six(6)months from the date of issuance of the permit.Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed.Permittee(s)further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE,FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE(EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR)TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION(DEP).FOR MORE INFORMATION,CONTACT DEP AT(239)344-5600. In addition to the conditions of this permit,there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county,and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts,state agencies,or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. INSPECTION JOB CARD—COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 8 A FOR INSPECTIONS PHONE 252-3726 PERMIT NUMBER: APPLICATION NUMBER: ISSUED: PRBD2015092870601 PRBD20150928706 JOB DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT NEW HOME(DEMO PRBD20150617253) 342 TRADEWINDS AVE LOT 11 4 bed/5.5 bath rm JOB LOCATION: 342 Trade Winds AVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CONNER'S VANDERBILT BCH EST UNIT 2 BLK M LOT 11 FOLIO#: 27585200007 SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE: 29-48-25 OWNER NAME: STONE-JESKE TR, ROXANNE B ROXANNE B STONE-JESKE TRUST UTD 8/10/05 CONTRACTOR: JENKS BUILDERS, INC. SETBACKS: FRONT: 30' REAR: 25'-----\\ LEFT: 7.5' RIGHT: 7.5' SPECIAL: FLOOD FZAE Principal \ ZONE: /10' accessor Y. DESCRIPTION OUTCOME COMMENTS 101-Pile Caps 102-Grade Beam To include the utility footing rebar(UFR) 103- Floating Slab To include the utility footing rebar(UFR) 104-Tie Beam 105-Shearwall 107-Sheathing Facia 108-Framing 109- Insulation 111-Roof in Progress 115-Final Building 119- Fill Cells 120- Flood Vent Relief NOTE: If you are unable to schedule your inspection, please contact the inspection desk at 252-2406. NOISE ORDINANCE: Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances 54-92(f) Construction Sound. NOISE LIMITATIONS are in effect at all times. Work permitted, RESIDENTIAL Areas — 6:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday thru Saturday; NON-RESIDENTIAL Areas (more than 500 feet from Residential Area) 6:00AM to 8:00PM Monday thru Saturday. No Work on Sundays or Holidays. RADIOS, LOUDSPEAKERS, ETC. — Must not disturb peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring inhabitants. FREE CABLE LOCATIONS — Call 48 Hours prior to digging/FPL 434-1222/UTS 1-800-542-0088/PalmerCATV 783-0638 and all other applicable utilities. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING,CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. FS§713.135 INSPECTION JOB CARD—COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 8 A FOR INSPECTIONS PHONE 252-3726 121-Epicore Deck 134-Final Roofing 136- Impact Glass 200-Plumbing Underground 201-Plumbing Rough-in 202- Plumbing Stack 203-Sewer Tap 204-Final Plumbing 300-A/C Rough 301-A/C Final 501-Elec. Rough 502-Final Electrical 505-Residential Temporary Power 508-TV/Telephone Rough 509-TV/Telephone Final 801-Site Drainage This building permit has a stormwater management plan,signed and sealed by a registered Florida Professional Engineer as was reviewed by RosenblumBrett 11/09/2015 10:06 AM. 802-Landscaping 810-Exotic Vegetation Removal 814- Erosion/Silt OPEN CONDITIONS >Elevation Certificate BFE AE-10'navd proposed FFE-10.33' navd MooreRobert 09/11/2015 4:21 PM >Notice of Commencement NOTE: If you are unable to schedule your inspection, please contact the inspection desk at 252-2406. NOISE ORDINANCE: Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances 54-92(f) Construction Sound. NOISE LIMITATIONS are in effect at all times. Work permitted, RESIDENTIAL Areas — 6:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday thru Saturday; NON-RESIDENTIAL Areas (more than 500 feet from Residential Area) 6:00AM to 8:00PM Monday thru Saturday. No Work on Sundays or Holidays. RADIOS, LOUDSPEAKERS, ETC. — Must not disturb peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring inhabitants. FREE CABLE LOCATIONS — Call 48 Hours prior to digging/FPL 434-1222/UTS 1-800-542-0088/PalmerCATV 783-0638 and all other applicable utilities. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING,CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. FS§713.135 AINSPECTION JOB CARD—COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 8 FOR INSPECTIONS PHONE 252-3726 Any required County impact fees will be due prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy >Spot Survey CO Hold: Spot Survey will be required within 10 days of passing a 103 or 133 inspection of slab, at which point an "Inspection HOLD"will be placed on this Permit. NOTE: Spot Survey must verify slab meets setbacks and minimum elevation per Chapter 62,Collier County Code of Laws(higher of BFE or 1.5'above crown of road,or per SFWMD Permit). >Compaction Test Engineer's piling certification required. rm This building permit has a stormwater management plan,signed and sealed by a registered Florida Professional Engineer as was reviewed by RosenblumBrett 11/09/2015 10:06 AM. > Need Sub Contractors roof plumbing electric mechanical NOTE: If you are unable to schedule your inspection, please contact the inspection desk at 252-2406. NOISE ORDINANCE: Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances 54-92(f) Construction Sound. NOISE LIMITATIONS are in effect at all times. Work permitted, RESIDENTIAL Areas — 6:30 AM to 7:00 PM Monday thru Saturday; NON-RESIDENTIAL Areas (more than 500 feet from Residential Area) 6:00AM to 8:00PM Monday thru Saturday. No Work on Sundays or Holidays. RADIOS, LOUDSPEAKERS, ETC. — Must not disturb peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring inhabitants. FREE CABLE LOCATIONS — Call 48 Hours prior to digging/FPL 434-1222/UTS 1-800-542-0088/PalmerCATV 783-0638 and all other applicable utilities. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. FS§713.135 8 A 4.02.03 -Specific Standards for Location of Accessory Buildings and Structures A. For the purposes of this section, in order to determine yard requirements,the term"accessory structure"shall include detached and attached accessory use structures or buildings notwithstanding the attachment of such structure or building containing the accessory use to the principal use structure or building. Accessory buildings and structures must be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure and shall conform with the following setbacks and building separations. Table 3. Dimensional Standards for Accessory Buildings and Structures on Non-Waterfront Lots And Non-Golf Course Lots in Zoning Districts other than Rural Agricultural (A) and Estates (E)**. Structure to Front Rear Side Structure (If Detached) i 10 1. Parking garage or carport, single-family SPS SPS 10 feet feet 35 2. One-story parking structures and/or carports SPS SPS 10 feet feet 3. Multistory parking structures SPS 35 SPS 1/1* feet 4. Swimming pool and/or screen enclosure (one-and two- i SPS 10 SPS N family) feet 5. Swimming pool (multi-family and commercial) SPS 20 15 feet N .a] feet 6. Tennis courts (private) (one-and two-family) SPS 15 SPS 10 feet feet 7. Tennis courts (multi-family, and commercial) j SPS 20 15 feet 20 feet feet 8. Utility buildings SPS 10 SPS 10 feet feet 9. Chickee, barbecue areas I SPS 10 SPS 10 feet feet 10 10. Attached screen porch SPS SPS N/A feet Page 1 8A 11. i Unlisted accessory SPS SPS SPS 10 feet 12. Satellite dish antenna NP 15 SPS 10 feet feet I 10 See Sec.4.02.01 13. ' Permanent emergency generators NP N/A feet D.13 1 i 3 N = None. N/A = Not applicable. NP = Structure allowed in rear of building only. SPS = Calculated same as principal structure. * = 1 foot of accessory height= 1 foot building separation. **=All accessory structures in Rural Agricultural and Estates zoning districts must meet principal structure setbacks. Table 4. Dimensional Standards for Accessory Buildings and Structures on Waterfront Lots and Golf Course Lots in Zoning Districts other than Rural Agricultural (A) and Estates (E)** 2 1 Setbacks k Structure to Front Rear Side structure (If Detached) 1. Parking garage or carport,single-family SPS SPS SPS 10 feet 2. One-story parking structures SPS SPS SPS 10 feet 3. Multistory parking structures SPS T SPS SPS 1/11 4. Swimming pool and/or screen enclosure (one-and SPS 10 SPS N two-family) feet' 5. Swimming pool (multi-family and commercial) SPS 20 feet 15 feet N 6. Tennis courts (private) (one- and two-family) SPS 15 feet SPS 10 feet Page 2 8 A 7. Tennis courts (multi-family and commercial) SPS 35 feet SPS 20 feet 8. Boathouses and boat shelters (private) SPS N/A 7.5 feet or 15 feet 10 feet See subsection 5.03.06F. 9. Utility buildings SPS SPS 10 feet 10 feet 1. 10. Chickee, barbecue areas SPS 10 feet SPS N I _.] 11. Davits, hoists and lifts N/A N/A '' 7.5 feet or 15 feet SPS 1 —] 12. Attached screen porch SPS 10 SPS SPS feet' '13. Unlisted accessory SPS SPS SPS 10 feet 14. Docks, decks and mooring pilings N/A N/A { 7.5 feet or 15 feet ? N/A 15. Boat slips and ramps (private) N/A N/A 7.5 feet N/A r 16. ' Satellite dish antennas NP 15 feet SPS 10 feet -- f See Sec.4.02.01 17. Permanent emergency generators NP 10 feet N/A D.13 50 18. Golf clubhouse and maintenance buildings5 50 feet 50 feet N/A feet i N = None. N/A= Not applicable. NP = Structure allowed in rear of building only. SPS = Calculated same as principal structure. ** =All accessory structures in Rural Agricultural and Estates zoning districts must meet principal structure setbacks. 11 foot of accessory height= 1 foot of building separation. 2ln those cases where the coastal construction control line is involved, the coastal construction control line will apply. Page 3 8 A 320 feet where swimming pool decks exceed 4 feet in height above top of seawall or top of bank, except Marco Island and Isles of Capri which may construct to a maximum of seven feet above the seawall with a maximum of four feet of stem wall exposure, with the rear setback of ten feet. 420 feet where floor or deck of porch exceeds 4 feet in height above top of seawall or top of bank, except Marco Island and Isles of Capri which may construct to a maximum of seven feet above the seawall with a maximum of four feet of stem wall exposure, with the rear setback of ten feet. 5 The setback shall apply to external boundaries of the golf course district, and shall be inclusive of separately platted buffer tracts. B. Accessory buildings shall not occupy an area greater than five(5)percent of the total lot area in all residential zoning districts, or occupy an area greater than forty (40) percent of any building envelope (i.e., area of lot remaining for building purposes after accounting for required setbacks), whichever is the lesser, provided the total maximum coverage provision of this ordinance for all principal and accessory buildings is not exceeded. Nothing herein contained shall serve to prevent the construction of an accessory building containing an area of less than 500 square feet provided all yard and building spacing requirements can be met. (Ord. No. 06-07, § 3.F; Ord. No. 07-67, § 3.J; Ord.No. 08-63, § 3.J; Ord. No. 14-33, § 3.J; Ord. No. 15-45, § 2.B) Page 4 8 /i Pool Permit Application And Permit 8 A Morrison Aluminum Construction, Inc CUSTOM POOLS / ALUMINUM January 18, 2016 Re: PRBD20160100767 342 Trade Winds Avenue Naples, Florida 34103 Dear Sir or Madam; The deck material to be used with this pool project is Travertine Stone pavers . Lighting selection for pool lights: Nichless LED Piling Cap locations as highlighted on Grade Beam Plan from House permit PRBD20160928706 The elevation of the pool equipment pad shall be 10'as required. Thank you, Kevin R. Morrison Contractor 1020 SE 12th Avenue Phone: 239.573.0549 Cape Coral, Florida 33990 www.macpools.net Fax: 239.573.6993 Lee AL000111 •CRC 1329307•CPC 1457467•RX 0066476 8 A O 0 0 0 0 rp ❑ ❑ p p p'O 'r r -, r 7 r i 005 1 ❑a 061 L`.,..- 06 0 `,.. 06 p01 p0 O 0'-------J L j . 0 0 J L J L__T J ❑: ❑ 0 ❑ ❑. r i t r r -1 r 1 i ® \l‘ 1 Lp�o ,' 0 0 0 o 0 Y j r ro 0 ❑re 1 `' 0 0J i F � L i J M r +❑r s o r❑, p, 0 O 0 0 s -O `—� 0 J ❑ r J r 0 r-� Jy r J L J :0 0 0 O 0 _❑i 0 ❑ o 0 r i 1 0 y 0 L__y t 't 15Iri , H Rte i 0e 0 Ra ❑ x h❑ ❑ ❑ J❑ Jp 0 1 o i 3-f4- A i p J❑ O \i‘ ❑LO J p ga mi eIl ' Lo� J❑�i 0 y {e> 4� L❑ ❑ ❑; 0 ❑ �❑ '❑J0 'o ` I-110 -N tm s- A - -D A , D R E �N p t )61 Z CES@ e>2 g�gl11,5 o,i 01 2,n lh LA 3 ri ERa �n VO eo V " r 1 m 2 m W 8A 0 0 0 0 0 ,o rp 0 0 0 . ❑ ❑ r r , r- r .____- , r , p0 1 ❑�j ❑�I i ,....,„ o o® L7 o° I o® o® 0 0J L--T 0 o L J L ❑ o r , r , r , r0 \i‘ I , i ❑ ❑ L -0 0 0 p 0 0 o 0 , r10 o, r O O I a —� +❑r ❑� r❑, ❑, r 0p0 p0 01 \l` r L J r y r , L , ;0 0 0 0 p1 0 0 0� r l •1 AAA r , L 0 0 b_ -°® 0 iii � r o�.a p �uoIp b L7 1 Y 0 0 sS i g,i91 I--JO Lo® o J❑` 'p 0 o ❑ Q RI s ©� , 0 L0 Q Fv L 0 0 O e' o U3 LO 0 0 0 p J❑ p ,Ho F rn > 0 L JD �� gpp i D y•MA w o f;P AhA 7 i a 2 o Z BuFiL w'' g aI. a a' i'l 1.0g h v vq i ftiA e i " r 1 m i m w ---1 8 A Residential Swimming Pool Safety Act Section A104 Contractor Accountability Two copies of this page shall be completed and returned with the permit application Job Address 342 Tradewinds Avenue Permit Number The residential Swimming Pool Safety Act requires that a barrier isolate any new or substantially remodeled swimming pool, spa, hot tub or water feature that has a water level that is more than 24" deep. This barrier may be horizontal (an approved safety cover) or vertical (a wall, fence, screen cage, raised deck or appropriate combination). If the vertical barrier is penetrated by a door, window or gate an alarm or self- closing device may also be required. Because of design variations more than one method may be required to isolate the water and should be so noted below. I acknowledge that a new swimming pool, spa or hot tub or water feature will be installed at the above address, and hereby affirm that one or more of the following methods shall be used to comply with the requirements of the current Florida Building Code. (Please initial as many methods as necessary to provide compliance) 1. The pool shall be equipped with a listed and approved safety cover that complies with ASTM /132-16-91. X The pool shall be isolated from access by an enclosure that complies with the pool barrier tAP requirement of the currently adopted Florida Building Code. I understand that not complying with the current Florida Building Code at the time of the final inspection, or when the pool is completed for contract purposes, shall constitute a violation of Chapter 515, Florida Statutes and shall be considered as committing a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable by fines of up to$500.00 and/or up to 60 days in j-' -s established in chapter 775 Florida Statutes. ,— .- _ 4,4,7/ Kevin R. Morrison Co {ac e f gnature & date Contractor's Name (please print) 09/03/2015 8 A , • • , . . , • ,y(c.,/,,,,, •, . .,, ,11, .i Iirai/11 r V4 111()/1/ii/a/ I 1 L • E ..--0.---z Imo N • - ___r______:.____1_,......... iiI 4 a IM!t1. . , E 1 res-I I. . _ ,,,_. _ i • °' c: I ,,,,, 11 4 SCALE+ 1'c10 I n LEGAL DESCRIPTION �L� , soon n/e ,i_ 110 - .Dori S.T ..Ines A.. { c m ■ smlMslw n/� < m carvrT.c.nH. I m OTT MO= �E [ I LONTRACT00.k SURVEYOR TO VERIFY Y LZ m N PLACEMENT OF HOUSC ON SITE PRIOR 1 U m T:COYYENCEMENi OF CONSTRUCTION. I y Q S ~ N EI. PLAN . I mYp Z SCAL 15 GENERAL NOTES INDEX I. DO NOT SLICE THESE DRALNINSS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS. DE616N PARAMETERS, SHEET # DESCRIPTION AND NOTES SHALL CONTROL CONTACT THE MELO MANAsmtH THE PL HITS NiT CONFLICTS IN TANS ow-mem61NNINs ••••••.....m. 1 SITECOV PLAN / ER SHEET T e D.o. C ON-SITE VERIFICATION OF ALL DIMENSIONS AND ,�, 2 FOUNDATION PLAN I CONDITIONS SHALL VE THE RE PONSIBILJTY OF THE r-ted ...........Hum S. DNIRA TORS. EACH SUB-CONTRACTOR SHALL FIRST FLOOR NOTE PLAN REPORT TO THE FIELD MANAGER ANY DSLRLPANCY OR OTHER QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO THE ORAMINES AND/OR �`"`�'"`�'�`�' ...�..� 4 SECOND FLOOR NOTE PLAN 1 SPECIFICATIONS, - �. ..�.�...�.�s ,e,..�,. S. IT IS THE INTENT THAT THESE DRAMINSS CE IN '"'�' ® _5 FIRST FLOOR DIMENSION PLAN COHPORMA ICE MITN ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL O�� D O• Oz^=^"'_�' COMM,STATE AND FEDERAL CODES,ORDINANCES,LAPS, ■• O. .5 SECOND FLOOR DIMENSION PLAN REWJ.TIOIb RIND RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 6OVEiIUNS THE ��'� '�'• , SITE Or HOPK _,.. "' �.�� P.D- ,,,-, 2 FIRST FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN A. ALL TRADES SHALL wRNISH ALL LABOR.EQUIPMENT. DDe�_�v.. off.. .. i?'"" 1 SECOND FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN -�� MATERIALS.AND PERFORM ALL MORK NECESSARY. �. INDICATED,REASONABLY INFERRED OR REQUIRED BY ANY �'•� g=4::= �'..� 2 ELEVATIONS CODE MITH JURISDICTION TO COMPLETE THEIR SCOPE OF .�.•_• �• 1............... I rroRK oo...:. .••••••• 13............. 1Q ELEVATIONS MAW.OF IkuiS Flow TIM�YI�Off.INA,u Norm omen•Ool.me•WERIOCE re .e....:.-,a-,-.._..--...-.--�....�.-. .fl CEILING PLAN OSON,,,,On,.„,� .R OYOM�R ` ^,..0. a.m..n..a..IR.IN...IW. ROOF PLAN' I 112 1.4.4.110 0.6 EMAIL OE looNfoiT lo r...=:=,... m N,,.N..R.s.Y.. =04.13,110i,,,OEUTI9 TO TM CEOMETION.11,011145 MAT 8..li.OX Ana na, J TYPICAL SECTIONS 8A.. • , • ; + ,,,.,.4." a1. qai Sgt€ Hipx, ...---, 4aa . b. � .- i1" f4 a s • _g g £ a / gilt in teL; 4011 a:1 X J` 3 1 E 1 rl •F "S 5 fi !iiI • tF. O fat' 1 191 j //%/// ///j 3.-0.it __,, Z rrI\/\ \/ -"i' ,s. u\s, _i „ r1 � Pd i � � �QY �a1.1i'€ 0 b afa5'.1r 3 .1 ,. (AY tl - 'C) R- q . r ! m z c) Nfil gg 5.1;1. 1 ; AaT � UN F O Q z -A lij ylA °o� 11 Q g$oo O ni 1il -r-.' IF —1 ,9 IN N'yN �g A '14 s 4 rd 9i 0111 6 e R £. €3 F n , on 9 ;ill _ z tl AT g hii 104 5Z4F pp IPr ...7, ‘1 �F" 4 8p II _�, __ by F. yeb u Q FFA off! a.2! nrn oa- .✓✓: .a -mak d4 2 0l eR o3 m z m 8 A 0 cr) 0., co r t...141110 m , 15 ft. II \ -, tv co v o . Q. m N o-co Cii; ca N 7 =" omc ,,,4 cpi @ CD p m ,; W Cl) — (?J)W C) 411 ' n;. CO D- "0 _ -\ o. C (�D ..a. 11 ft. , O N o m -z - — W o -n o o O Q n ca- >C 0p v v. v — n� n-co m01 0 c• N N ❑- = S O .� m-0 „`: W W 0n 'D O n 00)-� -6 v co CO -0 Q v n w rn 0 C11 e./1 -s w v W W � Co CD fJI D — r CO i CO 4 Coa CO J n U7 ("'") Ni S. _ \ N0 �• N p - CT1 CD 0 '-i-i,,„1,-1,-;:,\,.:1,--'_1-\t.. 11I:= r O y k ui 8 1J L .. p CD Q w rn Cis C— )- U) v ( cd9 z) G 8 A ROUTE SHEET Performance Review Residential Permit Number: PRBD20160100767 Permit Type: Pool Submittal: 1 1 Initial Submittal 01/12/2016 Submittal In Person Method: 2 Fast Track: Simultaneous: Master Permit#: Sets: Private Provider: Expedited Review: Planning Project: Business Name: Job CONSTRUCTION OF 387 SQ FT IN-GROUND POOL& 5'8" X 5'8"ZERO EDGE SPA, 3 HP VS Description: PUMP-ALARMS (PRBD20150928706) 342 TRADEWINDS AVE LOT 11 Details: Fire District: 11 North Naples Fire Bldg Code in FBC 5th Edition 2014 Effect: Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date Final Review 5 Day Review 1/12/2016 1/20/2016 Time FEMA Review 1/12/2016 1/15/2016 Plumbing and Handicap Review 1/12/2016 1/15/2016 Zoning Review 1/12/2016 1/15/2016 (� affid scanned l k [13- \' Other Applicable Reviews: Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date Entered by: stachuracarol Report Updated:0629/2015 —Tonle 8 NourseJoseph From: Jacksonian Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 9:23 AM To: NourseJoseph Cc: BridwellJason Subject: 342 Tradewinds Complainant, Steve 860-8070, states deck at rear of property unpermitted or noncompliant w/setbacks. Permit issued for new construction home, pool, dock/lift. Thanks. Ian Jackson Collier County License Compliance Officer Operations and Regulatory Management Growth Management Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Fl 34104 239-252-2451 ianjackson@colliergov.net Under Florida Law.e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead.contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Permit Application Status - CityView Portal Page 1 of 2 8 A GMD Public Portal Permit Application Status In order to schedule inspections,you need to be signed in. Note:You can collapse and expand individual sections by clicking the header of the section you wish to collapse/expand. — Summary Application Number: PRBD20160100767 Application Type: Building Application Status: Inspections Commenced Property Owner's Full Name: STONE-JESKE TR, ROXANNE B ROXANNE B STONE-JESKE TRUST UTD 8/10/05 Category of Work: Addition Occupancy Code: Residential,One and Two Family New or Guest House Description of Work: CONSTRUCTION OF 387 SQ FT IN-GROUND POOL&5'3"X 5'8"ZERO EDGE SPA,3 HP VS PUMP-ALARMS(PRBD20150928706) 342 TRADEWINDS AVE LOT 11 Locations: 2 758 520000 7 342 Trade Winds AVE Application Date: 01/12/2016 Issued Date: 01/28/2016 Expiration Date: 09/26/2016 1-2 Family or Comm: 1-2 Family - Contacts Contractor: MORRISON ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION INC(DBA)MAC CUSTOM POOLS- ALUMINUM,Address:1020 SE 12TH AVE,Phone:(239)573-0549 License Status Qualifier: KEVIN R.MORRISON,Address:7045 WESTWOOD DRIVE,Phone:(941) 925-9150 License Status Property Owner: STONE-JESKE TR,ROXANNE B ROXANNE B STONE-JESKE TRUST UTD 8/10/05,Address:531 TURTLE HATCH LN Contractor:Electrical: RAY ALLEN ELECTRICAL SERVICE INC,Address:5527 BERRYMAN STREET, Phone:(239)560-9148 License Status — Permits(Click to See Reviews) _ Fees _ Inspections _ Conditions _ Documents&Images Ar.S St 414c./Id CAi-i5 Seo http://cvportal.colliergov.net/CityViewWeb/Permit/Stas?permitId=144424 4/25 X2016 • Permit Application Status - CityView Portal Page 1 of 2 8.A GMD Public Portal Permit Application Status In order to schedule inspections,you need to be signed in. Note:You can collapse and expand individual sections by clicking the header of the section you wish to collapse/expand. — Summary Application Number: PRBD20150412083 Application Type: Building Application Status: Inspections Commenced Property Owner's Full Name: STONE-3ESKE TR,ROXANNE B ROXANNE B STONE-JESKE TRUST UTD 8/10/05 Category of Work: New Construction Occupancy Code: Residential,One and Two Family New or Guest House Description of Work: NEW SEAWALL,DOCK,BOATLIFT,AND ELECTRIC 342 TRADEWINDS AVE Locations: 27585200007 342 Trade Winds AVE Application Date: 04/20/2015 Issued Date: 05/04/2015 Expiration Date: 08/02/2016 1-2 Family or Comm: 1-2 Family - Contacts Property Owner: STONE-JESKE TR,ROXANNE B ROXANNE B STONE-JESKE TRUST UTD 8/10/05,Address:531 TURTLE HATCH LN Contractor: GREG ORICK II MARINE CONSTRUCTION,INC,Address:27171 DRIFTWOOD DR,Phone:(239)289-0792 License Statu9 Qualifier: GREGORY L.ORICK II,Address:270 NAPLES COVE,Phone:(239)289- 0792 License Status Contractor:Electrical: A GREG ORICK MARINE CONSTRUCTION INC.,Address:27171 Driftwood Drive,Phone:(239)289-0792 License Status - Permits(Click to See Reviews) - Fees - Inspections - Conditions - Documents&Images http://cvportal.colliergov.net/CityViewWeb/Permit/Status?permitId=115234 4/25/2016 Permit Application Status - CityView Portal Page 1 of 2 8 A GMD Public Portal Permit Application Status In order to schedule inspections,you need to be signed in. Note:You can collapse and expand individual sections by clicking the header of the section you wish to collapse/expand. - Summary Application Number: PRBD20150928706 Application Type: Building Application Status: Inspections Commenced Property Owner's Full Name: STONE-JESKE TR,ROXANNE B ROXANNE B STONE-JESKE TRUST UTD 8/10/05 Category of Work: New Construction Occupancy Code: Residential,One and Two Family New or Guest House Description of Work: CONSTRUCT NEW HOME(DEMO PRBD20150617253) 342 TRADEWINDS AVE LOT 11 4 bed/5.5 bath rm Locations: 27585200007 342 Trade Winds AVE Application Date: 09/08/2015 Issued Date: 11/16/2015 Expiration Date: 10/16/2016 1-2 Family or Comm: 1-2 Family - Contacts Property Owner: STONE-JESKE TR,ROXANNE B ROXANNE B STONE-JESKE TRUST UTD 8/10/05,Address:531 TURTLE HATCH LN Contractor: JENKS BUILDERS,INC.,Address:7600 ALICO RD#12 PMB 2,Phone:(239) 481-1219 License Status Qualifier: Jenks,Jason L.,Address:7600 Alico Rd.#12 PMB,Phone:(941)481-1219 License Status Contractor: Roofing: D PECK ROOFING INC,Address:2990 CARGO ST,Phone:(239)489-2200 License Status Contractor: Electrical: RAY ALLEN ELECTRICAL SERVICE INC,Address:5527 BERRYMAN STREET, Phone:(239)560-9148 License Statue Contractor: Plumbing: SOUTHERN PLUMBING SOLUTIONS INC,Address:PO BOX 50218,Phone: (239)288-4574 License Statue Contractor: Mechanical: COOL RUSH AIR INC,Address:422 SW 2ND TER 215,Phone:(239)810- 1798 License Status - Permits(Click to See Reviews) - Fees - Inspections - Conditions - Documents&Images http://cvportal.colliergov.net/CityViewWeb/Permit/Status?permitId=131853 4/25/2016 8A [VIDEO] Nassau Pools concept w screen Naples Florida - YouTube .3 www.yo utube.comf`watc h?v=foRHmA7IT2s `T- I BY POOLSTEt:'E1 294 VIEWS t; — Oct 21, 2011 Nassau Pools conceptwscreen Naples Florida ._. Swimming 2:31 111' Pool &spa wl screen enclosure Call Steve Eniens a 239-860-8070 For... [VEDEO]Swimming Pool Concept/ McCray Rev 1, Naples Florida - YouTube o www.youtube.comiwatcli?v=lDWibsayhgl - 4z. BY POO LSTEV EI 67 VIEWS -k. . �t Jul 15 2012 Designed by Steve, Call 239-860-8070 for information &Quotes 1:18 44 a .t - / Nassau Pools Naples Florida *** INSTR 5169459 OR 5192 PG 2459 RECORDED 9/8/2015 2:30 PM PAGES 1 *** DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $10.00 8 A ,70,4,,,, V )-0/ & 0 7 0 0 Permit No. PX ai5ouf1'axFolio No. NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT State of FLORIDA County of COLLIER The undersigned hereby gives notice that improvement will be made to certain real property,and in accordance with Chapter 713,Florida Statutes, the following information is provided In this Notice of Commencement. c?4'2 1d€4°4, ,z/404de 1.�s cription of Property:(legal description of the property,and street address if available) 3y, 7,—,,60/6.00.,,,,-20 /el/ Lbw ±'/'P L/�a/er�./f ,cc4•Xi/. //�,1/er' Qre .l / ' OD/ 2. General description of Improvement:/✓4°�,2 /—e17.//4 .71../.../ f��i">P Al leu Pi.. �11i� 3. Owner Information: / /� a. Name and address:Information: ..4 x/, ./ it/L°-. ...Lee 7�xLP2z' 2 7- '/6Q-1 y`30 . b. Interest in property: oaY>er— c. Name and address of fee simple titleholder(if other than Owner): 4.a. ontraCtor: name and address) �,ri ,t �ic4 /e . 7' ao ,s?/tee ,P! .4,-, F(, rfs; -L.,.f...9�.z b. Contractor's phone number. X39. t_I—G457 if 5. Surety ) - ; a. Name and Address: p' b. Phone number: /(t . c. Amount of nc • /{/ 13a. Lender.(name and address) �`^r1 . if b. Lender's phone number. / 4111,1M. 1� 7a. Persons within the State of Florida meal. d .r a jj jtT. .J or ther documents may be served as provided by Section 713.13(1)(a)7.,Ft rid' tut [' ;dress)\ . . C11 . b. Phone numbers of designated person :,.\..... s. S 9 _ Ba. In addition to himself or herself,Owne 4- .nates r 0 of to receive a copy of Llenor's Notice as prov . -r I action 713.13(1)(b)F,:•`r`• tatutes. b. Phone number of person or entity designa ,. • • , earl: , �2 ' • 9. Expiration date of notice of commencement(the - ..itkoft�� year from the date of recording unless a different date is specified) • WARNING TO OWNER: ANY PAYMENTS MADE BY THE OWNER AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT ARE CONSIDERED IMPROPER PAYMENTS UNDER CHAPTER 713,PART I,SECTION 713.13,FLORIDA STATUTES,AND CAN RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY.A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION.IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING,CONSULT WI? LENDEQ ORORN ��F OIMIYIENCIN�3 WORK OR RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. 44,14. cretTel (Signature r or Owneitls Authorized Officer/Director/Partner/Manager) (Signatory's Title/Office)The fogoing Ins1(ument was acknowledged before me this �1 sday of 1,. N 20i,(year),by go4Airtfix Z-e1L, 'Jane,.(1L4m(X.. (name of person)as (type of authority,...e.g. officer,trustee,attorney in fact)for (name of party on behalf of whom instrument was executed). DWIGHT E BROCK,CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT / !--, LV(IJA� ll,�.LrAl MLI�.Gz' (Signature of Deputy Clerk) (Signature of Notary Public-$tate of Florida) Awr1 F.Ir r'fv1 4-((I eaet- (Printed name of Deputy Clerk) (Print,Type,or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) tadaxIbidaidikelagebialkaltalwasibAboO Personally Known X OR Produced Identification 1DAWN EILEEN HARDEE ) Type of Identification Produced 4 (4.-) Hoary Piddle-State of Florida 1 1 My Calls.Expires Aug 23.2018 p Verification pursuant to Section 92.525,Florida Statutes, Under penalties of per(Vr$P, r/.` - thirrPfrilliDNikfiNillfho.g and that the facts stated in It are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. (Signature of Natural Person Signing Above) Rev.7/2007 8 f � ROUTE SHEET Performance Review ® es i -sir` Permit Number: PRBD20160100767 Permit Type: Pool Submittal: 2 2 Re-Submittal 01/20/2016-corr 1 SubmittalI er o Method: 2 Fast Track: Simultaneous: Master Permit#: Sets: Private Provider: Expedited Review: Planning Project: Business Name: Job CONSTRUCTION OF 387 SQ FT IN-GROUND POOL&5' 8"X 5'8"ZERO EDGE SPA, 3 HP VS Description: PUMP-ALARMS (PRBD20150928706) 342 TRADEWINDS AVE LOT 11 Details: Fire District: 11 North Naples Fire Bldg Code in FBC 5th Edition 2014 Effect: Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date Final Review 5 Day Review 1/20/2016 1/27/2016 Time FEMA Review 1/20/2016 1/25/2016 /� \s-. 'f1T /022/i/4 l J Plumbing and Handicap Review 1/20/2016 1/25/2016A.,- I Other Applicable Reviews: Review In Date Group/PMR Status''" Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date • Entered by: AngelTarpley Report Updated:06/29/2015 —Tonic BA ROUTE SHEET Performance Review Residential Permit Number: PRBD20160100767 Permit Type: Pool Submittal: 1 1 Initial Submittal 01/12/2016 Submittal In Person Method: 2 Fast Track: Simultaneous: Master Permit#: Sets: Private Provider: Expedited Review: Planning Project: Business Name: Job CONSTRUCTION OF 387 SQ FT IN-GROUND POOL &5'8"X 5'8"ZERO EDGE SPA, 3 HP VS Description: PUMP-ALARMS (PRBD20150928706) 342 TRADEWINDS AVE LOT 11 Details: Fire District: 11 North Naples Fire Bldg Code in FBC 5th Edition 2014 Effect: Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date Final Review 5 Day Review 1/12/2016 1/20/2016 Time FEMA Review 1/12/2016 1/15/2016 Plumbing and Handicap Review 1/12/2016 1/15/2016 j c/ r / / Zoning Review 1/12/2016 1/15/2016 affid scanned Other Applicable Reviews: Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date Entered by: stachuracarol Report Updated:0612912015 -Ionia 8 Affidavit in lieu of Certified Site Plan To be filed with Permit Application State of Florida County of Collier I, ��=,,,,,, P9o>r , do hereby affirm that the work performed under Permit Number /�jja, ( D/Oa - — does not constitute any modification to the original permitted footprint of the structure that existed prior to the issuance of this permit. I further affirm that, to the best of my knowledge, the footprint of the structure shall conform to the applicable setback(s) and easement requirement(s) established by Collier County and/or any other applicable agency. I hereby agree that should any work performed under this permit result in a nonconformity with any setback(s) or easement requirement(s) established by Collier County or any other applicable agency, I will have no sustainable rebuttal against Collier County Government and will immediately remediate the nonconformity at no expense oilier County Government. Signe_„_,,)/ 111 , • Printed Name: i47✓rn r}2,1 1 y (Check one) Owner/Builder [ ] Contractor [ f Design Professional [ 1 AFFIRMED AND SUBSCRIBED beffo�o e me, the undersigned authority, on /4)6/ /2-7 X1 6,, 2010, by (check one) who is personally known to mei' 1 or who provided as identification [ 1. (Seal) NOTARY PUBLIC — State of 41.Y. CAROL RUTH STACHURA MY COMMISSION#FF 093307 Printed Name: p}U EXPIRES:February 16,2018 N,-94.0�.o�``O� Bonded Thru Budget Notary Services My commission expires: 7/15/2013 A-128 8 A COLLIER COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Growth Management Division 12800 N.Horseshoe Drive,Naples,Florida 34104 TEL: 239-252-2400 Please fold plans with the plain side out. Ensure documents are stapled inside each set of plans. 0 Residential 1 or//2 Units(Single Family/Duplex) 0 Residential 3 or more Units(Multi-family)❑Commercial Permit No. )iw.1/J-O/G, 8 /.e)0--2(-a-2 Master Permit No. Parcel/Folio: 27585200007 ['Contractor ['Design Professional ❑Owner Builder Job Address: 342 Tradewinds Avenue O License#State Cert/Reg.-Prefix: CPC #: 1457467 Owner's Phone No.: 405-343-4215 E-15 Company Name: Morrison Aluminum Construction Inc. O Owner's Name: Roxanne B.Stone-Jeske TR Qualifier/Professional Name: Kevin R. Morrison ULot: 11 Block: M Unit: 2 w Contact Name: Kathy Gagne o Subdivision: ConnerVanderbuilt Bch. Est.#2 C Address: 1020 SE 12th Avenue Township: 48 Range: 25 Section: 29 V City: Cape Coral State: Florida Zip: 33990 ,-' 239-573-)549 Fax: 239-573-6993 FEMA: BFE: Flood Zone: E-1 Phone SDP/PL: p E-mail Address: Kathy@macpools.net U Code Case: COA: (Alteration nMechanical OClean Agent System OLP Gas z Convenience Book OMobile Home W Fire Alarm ❑Pre-Engineered Fire Demo ❑New Construction a Fire Alarm Monitoring O Suppression A F ODoor/Window ❑Plumbing .'i", El Fire Pumps (Standpipes QElectric/Low Voltage [Pool W AFire Sprinkler System rSpray Booths O w =Electric from House =Re-roof Fossil Fuel Storage System Tents Fence Screen Enclosure . P. Hoods Underground Fire Lines o. AIp Gas BShutter E' ❑Marine ❑Sign/Flagpole F OTHER ❑Solar a Q Private Provider ElPlumbing z 1241-sprinkled ❑Sprinkled 0 o O Roofing 0 Electrical pa U Q Septic Q Low Voltage aw, Q� DIB QUA QI1B Q Shutters Q Mechanical Fo F Q OMB DIVA ❑IVB C Q Permit by Affidavit G nVA DVB 1 C.) Occupancy Classification(s): Description of Work Construction of 387 sq ft in-ground pool&5'8"x 5'8"zeror) edge spa G6S 3A,, 10#� M� — /)9rrr1 z 0 F74,000.00 Project Name: Stone-Jeske pool/spa Declared Value$: g O NEW CONSTRUCTION/ADDITION AREA ALTERATION WORK AREA- SQ.FT. 44E. If applicable: #Stories/Floors:_ #Units: #Tons: Bedrooms: #Baths: RESIDENTIAL: C..) # Living: Non-living: 00 RESIDENTIAL: Living: Non-living: Total sq.ft.: TOTAL SQ.FT.: Po COMMERCIAL: Interior: Exterior: COMMERCIAL: #Fixtures: Interior: Exterior: Total: TOTAL SQ.FT.: SEWAGE: y) ❑ Septic❑Ave Maria =City of Naples =✓ Collier County D Golden Gate City Q Immokalee E]Orange Tree ❑Other w F WATER SUPPLY: Ei Q Well Q Ave Maria City of Naples D Collier County Q Golden Gate City Q Immokalee Q Orange Tree❑Other E. Application/Plans Discrepancies-Customer Acknowledgement of possible rejection for the following missed information: 1.Square footage discrepancies 2.Occupancy Classification/Construction type not provided 3.Required documents not ce 'fled 4.Incomplete Plan Sets or Drawings 5. Sets not identical Nov.1,2014-PMR Date: Days Review: # Set of Plans: 7 - • A QUALIFIERS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COLLIER COUNTY REGULATIONS Application is hereby made to obtain a pen-nit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. The permit or application fee may have additional fees imposed for failing to obtain permits prior to commencement of construction. The approved permit and/or permit application expires if not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance. The permittee further understands that only licensed contractors may be employed and that the structure will not be used or occupied until a certificate of occupancy is issued. By signing this permit application, I agree that I have been retained by the owner/permittee to provide contracting services for the trade for which I am listed. Furthermore, it is my responsibility to notify the Building Review and Permitting De partment should I no longer be the contractor responsible for providing said contracting services. I further agree that I understand that the review and issuing of this permit does not evampt me from complying with all County Codes and Ordinances. It is further understood that the property owner/permittee is the owner of the permit. Note: If change of contractor, please provide the following: Permit Number: E-mail Address: Tel: COMPANY NAME: Morrison Aluminum Construction Inc. STATE LICENSE NO: CPC 1457467 QUALIFIER'S NAME (PRINT) : Kevin R. Morrison_, si ANN QUALIFIER'S SIGNATUR • STATE OF: ippe.-00000 Florida / r -- `�`r *PO eldss p G`�jc� �t' V t9'20Ze. ' SWORN TO(OR AFFIRMED AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS 7 /Jlt�` / _s*.�� WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN: L, ORAS PRODUCED ID: ot • � #,FF134983 ..1'44cis 1.:::7"53i,..�yO4a Bended TYPE OF ID: A •;,vbric undo'. • \' NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: _ _ _ i �� (SEALy,,c,s 1l11�O\\\\\`` NOTICE IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENT' OF THIS PERMIT, THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROPERTY THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY, AND THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL PERMITS REQUIRED FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES SUCH AS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT,STATE AGENCIES,OR FEDERAL AGENCIES. WARNING OF POSSIBLE DEED RESTRICTIONS THE LAND SUBJECT TO THIS PERMIT MAY BE SUBJECT TO DEED, AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS THAT MAY LIMIT OR IMPAIR THE LANDOW NER'S RIGHTS. COLLIER COUNTY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THESE RESTRICTIONS, NOR ARE COLLIER COUNTY EMPLOYEES AUTHORIZED TO PROVIDE LEGAL. OR BUSINESS ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC RELATIVE TO THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE LANDOWNER OR ANY APPLICANT ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE LANDOWNER IS CAUTIONED TO SEE K PROFESSIONAL ADVICE. WARNING ON WORK IN COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAYS THIS PERMIT DOES_NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALLATION OF ANY STRUCTURE OR UTILITY, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND, WITHIN ANY RIGHT-OF-W AY OR EASEMENT RESERVED FOR ACCESS, DRAINAGE OR UTILITY PURPOSES. THIS RESTRICTION SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITS FENCING, SPRINKLER SYSTEMS, LANDSCAPING OTHER TH AN SOD, SIGNS, WATER, SEWER, CABLE AND DRAINAGE WORK THEREIN. IF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS ARE NECESSARY, A SEPARATE PERMIT FOR THAT PURPOSE MUST BE OBTAINED FROM TRANSPORTATION/ROW PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS(239)252-8192. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Per Florida Statutes 713.135 a Notice of Com mencem ent(NOC)is required for construction of improvements totaling more than$2,500,with certain exceptions. For A/C Repairs or Replacements a notice of commencement is required for improvements more than$7,500. The applicant shall file with the issuing authority prior to the first inspection either a certified copy of the recorded NOC ora notarized statement that the NOC has been filed for recording,along with a copy thereof.In order to comply with the state requirement,permits will be placed in inspection hold until proof of the NOC is filed with the building permitting and inspection department.The issuing authority shall not perform or approve subsequent inspections until the applicant files by mail,facsimile,hand delivery,email or any other means such certified copy with the issuing authority. 8A COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION / PLANNING AND REGULATION 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples FL 34104 * Phone (239) 252-2400 Outstanding Corrections Date: January 20, 2016 PERMIT NO: PRBD2016010076701 Contact Name: MORRISON ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION NO: PRBD20160100767 INC (DBA) MAC CUSTOM POOLS-ALUMINUM Address: 1020 SE 12TH AVE JOB SITE ADDRESS: 342 Trade Winds AVE City, State Zip: CAPE CORAL, FL 33990-- Fax: (239) 573-6993 Email: Dear Applicant: Plans submitted with the referenced permit have been reviewed. We are unable to approve your permit application for the reason(s) indicated below. Submit 2 sets of revised sheets along with 2 letters of response addressing each item. All corrections must be clouded. Corrections must be submitted in person, the GMD office receiving corrections is open until 4:00 pm. (NOTE: SIRE permit corrections must be resubmitted through SIRE) JOB DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCTION OF 387 SQ FT IN-GROUND POOL&5' 8"X 5' 8"ZERO EDGE SPA, 3 HP VS PUMP -ALARMS (PRBD20150928706) 342 TRADEWINDS AVE LOT 11 Rejected Review: FEMA Review Reviewed By: Tim Rygiel Phone:239-252-2455 Email:TimothyRygiel@colliergov.net Correction Comment 1: Provide pool equipment pad elevation. AE 10 flood zone.All equipment must be above BFE Rejected Review: Plumbing and Handicap Review Reviewed By: Tim Rygiel Phone:239-252-2455 Email:TimothyRygiel@colliergov.net Correction Comment 1: Provide pile cap location detail. Correction Comment 2: Provide deck material (concrete or pavers) and lighting selection (nichless LED or niche required LED/100w) ATTENTION: Collier County Plan Review and Inspections routinely reviews all outstanding permit applications in order to determine their status. The review process includes appropriate responses from the permit applicant when the permit cannot be approved. When the applicant is advised of deficiencies and does not respond within 180 days with corrected plans or an appeal to the Code Enforcement Board, the permit application will be canceled as per Collier County Ordinance 2002-01, Section, 104.5.1.1 to 104.5.1.4. IMPORTANT: The new Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) will be effective on March 30, 2012. All development and building permit must be in compliance with the DFIRM flood zone and flood elevation requirements beginning on March 30, 2012. Please note 8A ' that applications submitted prior to March 30, 2012, but issued after March 29, 2012, must be in compliance with the DFIRM requirements. .\... -,-) •\ ,,e), ,\ c \—.1 i _ p„ \ COLLIER COUNTY 8A BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT#: PRBD2015092870601 PERMIT TYPE: BD ApFROVAL ATE: 11-13-15 MUM BY: APPLIED DATE:09-08-15 ---r MASTER#: COA: JOB ADDRESS; 342 Trade Winds AVE • JOB DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT O STRD CTINEW W A HOE ME DEMO PRBD20150617253) JOB PHONE: 2 4 bed t 5.5 bath rm BLOCK: LUT: 3UBQIVISION it: ELEVATION: FLOOD MAP: ZONE: FOLIO#: 27585200007 SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE:29-48-25 OWNER INFORMATION: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: STONE-JESKE TR,ROXANNE B ROXANNE B JENKS BUILDERS,INC. STONE-JESKE TRUST UTD 8/10/05 7600 ALICO RD#12 PMB 2 531 TURTLE HATCH LN FORT MYERS,FL 33912- NAPLES ,FL 34103- CERTIFICATE#::C20383 PHONE: FCC CODE: CONSTRUCTION CODE: 0218 JOB VALUE: $1,100,000.00 TOTAL RES SOFT: 6449 TOTAL COMM SOFT: 0 LEFT: 7.5' SETBACKS FRONT: 30' REAR; 25'Principal/ 10'accessory RIGHT: 7.5' SEWER: Sewer WATER: Existing CONTACT NAME: CONTACT PHONE: N. . ,-- es,ordinances,and any Per Collier County Ordinance No.2002-01,as it may be amended,all work must ache permit is no applicable ommenced within six(6)months from the date of additional stipulations or conditions of this permit.This permit expires if work authorizedby issuancenrstof the anypermit. ntAdditional tat esmay a bfailing employedobtain mustbea'ts prior licensed to the commencement of contractor and that the structure must not been ed oroccup ed until further understands that any contractor Y Certificate of Occupancy is issued. RAL NOTICE:PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DR MOLLRAOONO)A SUBMIUR STRUCTURE, FEDE OF AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMI t'I'EE(EITHER THE OWNER OTIC THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE D�4 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION(DEP).FOR MORE 9 INFORMATION,CONTACT DEP AT(2 39) 00. ay be found in In addition to the conditions of this permit,there may ddb honaladdittonal permits regal ed fromons tcable to other governmental entities property that s such as water the public records of this county,and there may be a management districts,state agencies,or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS WITH TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF ALPHA ENGINEERING 8A Structural Engineering •Consulting Civil Engineers January 11,2016 Colfier County Government Growth Management Division/Planning and regulation 2800 N. Horseshoe DE Naples, Florida 34104 RE Koeper Residence ATTN: (City Officials) To whom It may concent The following letter is to infotnn you of the following changes made to the Koeper Residence and that Alpha Engineering has made these changes and approves of them as follows: 1 We are removing the Grade Beam from the pool areas_ 2_ We are going to continue the footer at slab height in the designated areas by contractor 3. Pilling it's 23&47 are good at 12 ton capacity rather than the previous 15 ton capacity noted 4. Engineer approves the change of concrete pad from 30x24 to the new size of 24x24 w/MT top&bottom. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact our office at arrytine_ sT,Ausr*_ Sincerely, ALPHA •EERING OF LEE COUN1Y„ INC_ ce= = sl kl 4%- a rvey Strauss, RE_ President Vo\ .4" • **0:cc- 1/41.*``' 4ilittffioiltiO s HS/as 6315 Presidential Court*Suite 120• Fort Myers, FL 33919 PHONE (239)267-7777• FAX (239)267-7752 vftwyealppitliatcovntyp.cgin tt: I f 8A BUILDINGy PT COPY A 1, V lig x x''�\"'iiiiii _>., 'irk d Attach to File REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPWWCE EWE Zoning Engineering !Building Electrical Mechanical Gas Plumbing Structural/106. Fire Prey. Health Utilities R 6-;% z• ao \ S ' •'"‘'�.e♦1t4‘4 ` a4)% 8 A COLLIER COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT REVISION FORM Growth Management Division 12800 N.Horseshoe Drive,Naples Florida 34104 TEL: 239-252-2400 0 Residential 1 or 2 Units(Single Family/Duplex) J Residential 3 or more Units(Multi-family) 0 Commercial Permit No. PRBD2015092870601 4 0 Contractor ❑Own r Builder' Job Address: 342 Trade Winds Ave z Company Name: Jenks Builders Inc Z w, z Jason Jenks E Parcel#/Folio: 27585200007 o Qualifier/Professional Name: o. 5 Contact Name:Jason Jenks Stone-Jakes TR Roxanne Boxanr c w Address: 7600 Alico Rd 12-2 Gq Owner's Name: F o v 4 City:Fort Myers State:Fl Zip:33912 Phone 239-481-1219 Fax:239-481-8004 Agent Submitting Revision:Jason Jenks z o U E-mail Address: Jason@jenksbuildersinc.com ALL REVISIONS MUST BE"CLOUDED"WITH AN ITEMIZED LIST OF THE SCOPE OF WORK Note:Changes to any exterior portion of the building may result in an architectural review which may require an SDP amendment/change.Please clearly indicate any change to the facade and/or exterior of building.Additional Cost value must be greater than zero dollars($0). Description of Work Engineer changed bearing capacity on 2 pilings, deleted 2 grade beams on pool deck and resized footing due ground water. 41 Project Name: Koeper 0 Additional Cost of Construction$: l ,d G Additional SQ.Ft.Living/Interior: 0 Additional SQ.Ft.Non Living/Exterior: 0 Check Trades Affected By Revision (check all applicable trades associated with revision) 0 Private Provider 0 Plumbing 0 Roofing 0 Electrical 0 Septic El Low Voltage El Shutters 0 Mechanical 0 Permit by Affidavit Ej Structural Qualifier Acknowledgement of Revision Submittal COMPANY NAME: Jenks Builders Inc STATE LICENSE NO:CBC 058565 QUALIFIER'S NAME(PRINT); 4�son Jenks / 3'C' QUALIFIER'S SIGNATUR /4/-.7c---- ----,/ 7 �r9� STATE OF: FI COUNTY OF: Lee ��6, SWORN TO(OR AFFIRMED)AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS 01 /19 /16 WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN:1 OR AS PRODUCED ID: 'Thsle SHO�IDAA JEMcs r ?, I/ MMISSION#FF034956 .�: MY{�.a: EXPIRES:July 9,2017 TYPE OF ID: 8r..Th." BandedThruNateryPubic Undervffiters NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: it. ( ;A( L-� ' ,..,_0-.....A— i'~- tti (SEAL) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW.FOR STAFF USE ONLY INSPECTIONS NEEDED: ADDITIONAL FEES: Building: $ Fire: $ 11/1/14—PMR Date: Days Review: I # Set of Plans: 3 8 A COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION / PLANNING AND REGULATION 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples FL 34104 * Phone (239) 252-2400 Outstanding Corrections Date: January 25, 2016 PERMIT NO: PRBD2015092870601 Contact Name: JENKS BUILDERS, INC. APPLICATION NO: PRBD20150928706 Address: 7600 ALICO RD#12 PMB 2 JOB SITE ADDRESS: 342 Trade Winds AVE City,State Zip: FORT MYERS, FL 33912- Fax: (239)481-8004 Email:Jason@Jenksbuildersinc.com Dear Applicant: Plans submitted with the referenced permit have been reviewed. We are unable to approve your permit application for the reason(s) indicated below. Submit 3 sets of revised sheets along with 3 letters of response addressing each item. All corrections must be clouded. Corrections must be submitted in person, the GMD office receiving corrections is open until 4:00 pm. (NOTE: SIRE permit corrections must be resubmitted through SIRE) JOB DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT NEW HOME (DEMO PRBD20150617253) 342 TRADEWINDS AVE LOT 11 4 bed/5.5 bath rm Rejected Review: Residential Review Reviewed By: Dan Wasch Phone:239-252-6811 Email:danielwasch@colliergov.net Correction Comment 1: Provide revised plans showing which grade beams are being deleted,which footer in what designated areas are being extended, and which pad is being changed. Correction Comment 2: This review shall be considered incomplete pending receipt of the information requested. Subsequent reviews may reveal additional deficiencies. ATTENTION: Collier County Plan Review and Inspections routinely reviews all outstanding permit applications in order to determine their status. The review process includes appropriate responses from the permit applicant when the permit cannot be approved. When the applicant is advised of deficiencies and does not respond within 180 days with corrected plans or an appeal to the Code Enforcement Board, the permit application will be canceled as per Collier County Ordinance 2002-01, Section, 104.5.1.1 to 104.5.1.4. IMPORTANT: The new Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) will be effective on March 30, 2012. All development and building permit must be in compliance with the DFIRM flood zone and flood elevation requirements beginning on March 30, 2012. Please note that applications submitted prior to March 30, 2012, but issued after March 29, 2012, must be in compliance with the DFIRM requirements. 8A ROUTE SHEET 3p,7 Performance Review � - 5-- I Residential • .,=;._r.. �. ._,.a•. .�:�•,.. a ,�,-� ____,... ,�a�"`;�,. Permit Number: PRBD20150928706 Permit Type: Revision - Building Submittal: 5 5 Re-Submittal corr 4 Submittal Drop Off Method: 3 Fast Track: Simultaneous: Master Permit#: Sets: Private Provider: Expedited Review: Planning Project: Business Name: Job CONSTRUCT NEW HOME (DEMO PRBD20150617253) Description: 342 TRADEWINDS AVE LOT 11 4 bed/5.5 bath rm Details: REVISION# 1 ENGINEER CHANGED BEARING CAPACITY ON 2 PILINGS DELTED 2 GRADE BEAMS ON POOL DECK AND RESIZED FOOTING DUE TO GROUND WATER Fire District: 11 North Naples Fire Bldg Code in FBC 5th Edition 2014 Effect: Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date Final Review 5 Day Review 2/2/2016 2/9/2016 Time Residential Review -DLL) 2/2/2016 2/5/2016 Other Applicable Reviews: Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date (- 02) ON:4/TOP44—e Entered by: vickiscott Report Updated:06/29/2015 -Tonia SA JENKS BUILDERS, INC. 7000 ALICO RD. 12-2 . FORT MYERS, FL 33912 PHONE: 239-481-1219 February 1, 2016 Collier County Government Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Re: 342 Tradewinds Ave. Permit No.: PRBD2015092870601 Dear Sirs: I am in response to your letter dated January 25, 2016. Correction comment 1: Sheet S3 has been provided showing deleted grade beams,new footer size and raised grade. Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 239-565- 3571. Sincerely, 7 tt.)6' Jason Jenks Jenks Builders, Inc. .. 8A ELEVATION CERTIFICATE, page 2 IM?'ORTANT:In these spaces,copy the corresponding information from Section A. FOR INSURANCE COMPANY USE Building Street Address(including Apt.,Unit,Suite,and/or Bldg. No.)or PO. Route and Box No. Policy Number: 342 TRADE WINDS AVENUE City State ZIP Code Company NAIC Number: NAPLES FL 34103 SECTION D—SURVEYOR, ENGINEER,OR ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION (CONTINUED) Copy both sides of this Elevation Certificate for(1)community official,(2)insurance agent/company,and(3)building owner. Comments C2.e)is a concrete NC pad on the East side of the building Signaturefiai -‘ Date 05/19/2016 SECTION E— BUILD G ELEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY NOT REQUIRED) FOR ZONE AO AND ZONE A(WITHOUT BFE) For Zones AO and A(without BFE),complete Items El—E5. If the Certificate is intended to support a LOMA or LOMR-F request,complete Sections A,Band C. For Items El—E4,use natural grade,if available.Check the measurement used. In Puerto Rico only,enter meters. El.Provide elevation information for the following and check the appropriate boxes to show whether the elevation is above or below the highest adjacent grade(HAG)and the lowest adjacent grade(LAG). a)Top of bottom floor(including basement,crawlspace,or enclosure)is ❑feet ❑meters ❑above or 0 below the HAG. b)Top of bottom floor(including basement,crawlspace,or enclosure)is ❑feet ❑meters 0 above or ❑below the LAG. E2.For Building Diagrams 6-9 with permanent flood openings provided in Section A Items 8 and/or 9(see pages 8-9 of Instructions), the next higher floor(elevation C2.b in the diagrams)of the building is ❑feet ❑meters ❑above or 0 below the HAG. E3.Attached garage(top of slab)is 0 feet ❑meters 0 above or ❑below the HAG. E4.Top of platform of machinery and/or equipment servicing the building is 0 feet ❑meters ❑above or ❑below the HAG. ES.Zone AO only:If no flood depth number is available,is the top of the bottom floor elevated in accordance with the community's floodplain management ordinance?❑Yes ❑No ❑Unknown.The local official must certify this information in Section G. SECTION F—PROPERTY OWNER (OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE) CERTIFICATION The property owner or owner's authorized representative who completes Sections A,B,and E for Zone A(without a FEMA-issued or community-issued BFE)or Zone AO must sign here.The statements in Sections A,B,and E are correct to the best of my knowledge. Property Owner or Owner's Authorized Representative's Name Address City State ZIP Code Signature Date Telephone Comments 0 Check here if attachments. SECTION G—COMMUNITY INFORMATION (OPTIONAL) The local official who is authorized by law or ordinance to administer the community's floodplain management ordinance can complete Sections A,B,C(or E),and G of this Elevation Certificate.Complete the applicable item(s)and sign below.Check the measurement used in Items G8—G10.In Puerto Rico only,enter meters. G1. ❑ The information in Section C was taken from other documentation that has been signed and sealed by a licensed surveyor, engineer,or architect who is authorized by law to certify elevation information.(Indicate the source and date of the elevation data in the Comments area below.) G2. ❑ A community official completed Section E for a building located in Zone A(without a FEMA-issued or community-issued BFE)or Zone AO. G3. El The following information(Items G4—G9)is provided for community floodplain management purposes. G4. Permit Number G5. Date Permit Issued G6. Date Certificate Of Compliance/Occupancy Issued G7. This permit has been issued for: El New Construction ❑Substantial Improvement G8. Elevation of as-built lowest floor(including basement)of the building: 0 feet ❑meters Datum G9. BFE or(in Zone AO)depth of flooding at the building site: 0 feet ❑meters Datum GlO.Community's design flood elevation: . ❑feet 0 meters Datum Local Official's Name Title Community Name Telephone Signature Date Comments ❑Check here if attachments. FEMA Form 086-0-33(7/12) Replaces all previous editions. 8 A U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ELEVATION CERTIFICATE OMB No. 1660-0008 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY Expiration Date: July 31, 2015 National Flood tnsumncn Program IMPORTANT: Follow the instructions on pages 1-9. SECTION A—PROPERTY INFORMATION FOR INSURANCE COMPANY USE Al. Building Owner's Name STONE-JESKE/KOEPER Policy Number: A2. Building treet TRADEess(INDS ingAApt., t.Unit,Suite,and/or Bldg.No.)or P0. Route and Box No. Company NAIC Number: 342City NAPLES State FL ZIP Code 34103 A3. Property Description(Lot and Block Numbers,Tax Parcel Number,Legal Description,etc.) LOT 11, BLOCK M, UNIT No. 2, CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES A4. Building Use(e.g.,Residential,Non-Residential,Addition,Accessory,etc.) RESIDENTIAL A5. Latitude/Longitude: Lat. 28° 15'42" Long. 81°49' 12" Horizontal Datum: 0 NAD 1927 ❑x NAD 1983 A6. Attach at least 2 photographs of the building if the Certificate is being used to obtain flood insurance. A7. Building Diagram Number 1R A8. For a building with a crawlspace or enclosure(s): A9.For a building with an attached garage: a) Square footage of crawlspace or enclosure(s) 0 sq ft a) Square footage of attached garage 555 sq ft b) No. of permanent flood openings in the crawlspace or 0 b) Number of permanent flood openings in the attached garage enclosure(s)within 1.0 foot above adjacent grade within 1.0 foot above adjacent grade 0 c) Total net area of flood openings in A8.b 0 sq in c) Total net area of flood openings in A9.b 0 sq in d) Engineered flood openings? ❑Yes ®No d) Engineered flood openings? ❑Yes ®No SECTION B—FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP(FIRM) INFORMATION 81. NFIP Community Name&Community Number 82. County Name 83. State UNINCORPORATED COLLIER COUNTY 120067 COLLIER FL B4. Map/Panel Number B5.Suffix B6. FIRM Index Date B7. FIRM Panel Effective/ B8. Flood Zone(s) B9. Base Flood Elevation(s)(Zone Revised Date A0,use base flood depth) 12021C0189 H 05/16/2012 05/16/2012 AE 10' B10.Indicate the source of the Base Flood Elevation(BFE)data or base flood depth entered in Item 69: ❑FIS Profile + FIRM ❑Community Determined ❑Other/Source: B11.Indicate elevation datum used for BFE in Item B9: ❑NGVD 1929 ®NAVD 1988 ❑Other/Source: B12.Is the building located in a Coastal Barrier Resources System(CBRS)area or Otherwise Protected Area(OPA)? ❑Yes ®No Designation Date: / / ❑CBRS ❑OPA SECTION C— BUILDING ELEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY REQUIRED) Cl. Building elevations are based on: ❑Construction Drawings* ®Building Under Construction* ❑Finished Construction *A new Elevation Certificate will be required when construction of the building is complete. C2. Elevations—Zones A1—A30,AE,AH,A(with BFE),VE,V1—V30,V(with BFE),AR,AR/A,AR/AE,AR/A1—A30,AR/AH,AR/AO.Complete Items C2.a—h below according to the building diagram specified in Item A7. In Puerto Rico only,enter meters. Benchmark Utilized: FL DNR COL 29 Vertical Datum: NAVD 1988 Indicate elevation datum used for the elevations in items a)through h)below. ❑NGVD 1929 ►_.NAVD 1988 ❑Other/Source: Datum used for building elevations must be the same as that used for the BFE. Check the measurement used. a) Top of bottom floor(including basement,crawlspace,or enclosure floor) 10 . 4 ®feet ❑meters b) Top of the next higher floor n/a . ❑feet ❑meters c) Bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member(V Zones only) n/a . ❑feet ❑meters d) Attached garage(top of slab) 04 . 8 ®feet ❑meters e) Lowest elevation of machinery or equipment servicing the building 10 . 3 ®feet 0 meters (Describe type of equipment and location in Comments) f) Lowest adjacent(finished)grade next to building(LAG) 03 8 C1 feet ❑meters g) Highest adjacent(finished)grade next to building(HAG) 09 , 8 feet ❑meters h) Lowest adjacent grade at lowest elevation of deck or stairs, including n/a . ❑feet ❑meters structural support SECTION D—SURVEYOR,ENGINEER,OR ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION This certification is to be signed and sealed by a land surveyor,engineer,or architect authorized by law to certify elevation information. 1 certify that the information on this Certificate represents my best efforts to interpret the data available. I understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S.Code,Section 1001. ❑x Check here if comments are provided on back of form. Were latitude and longitude in Section A provided by a El Check here if attachments. licensed land surveyor? ❑Yes ®No Certifier's Name License Number SCOTT E. MARHENKE 4920 Title Company Name P.S.M. OMNI SURVEYS, INC. Address City State ZIP Code 4568 TILTON COURT FORT MYERS FL 33907 Signature Date Telephone 4f405/19/2016 (239)939-3666 'A Form 086-0-33(7/12) See reverse side for continuation. Replaces all previous editions. COLLIER COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT REVISION FORM sA Growth Management Division 12800 N.Horseshoe Drive,Naples Florida 34104 TEL: 239-252-2400 Residential 1 or 2 Units(Single Family/Duplex) []Residential 3 or more Units(Multi-family) 0 Commercial Permit No. PR Q> c�� 1 L� t c� 0 (,) `D ontractor Downer Builder Job Address3LA a. I rc,c P k.) w, S AVC z \ R. Company Name: -�e k 5 lII LA \�l•A P C 171 c • F:),, Parcel#/Folio: u)7-� �J o H Qualifier/Professional Name: v a ¢ Contact Name: -) Jr� J c'S Mj�' ao o Address: c I -J- Di Owner's Name: C E z 7<c,,--04-1.n (is. / City:/1'41/(7> State: /7-2 Zip: c1 I „2. Agent Submitting Revision: — 7 P r\ 5 Phone ��1 c-) l 01 �1_ Fax:v9,3 i-4/5i ec,0 t I 0 a E-mail Address: 5e--\ ALL REVISIONS MUST BE"CLOUDED"WITH AN ITEMIZED LIST OF THE SCOPE OF WORK Note:Changes to any exterior portion of the building may result in an architectural review which may require an SDP amendment/change.Please clearly indicate any change to the façade and/or exterior of building.Additional Cost value must be greater than zero dollars(S0). Description of Work: S t 1)('0 E 5C Sr. \ SC1`ct \ Project Name: 1 U C- (� e 1 Additional Cost of Construction$: 1 G 6) Additional SQ.Ft.Living/Interior: Additional SQ.Ft.Non Living/Exterior: amu: ...�J N Check Trades Affected By Revision (check all applicable trades associated witision) o Private Provider 0 Plumbing 0 Roofing 0 Electrical MOM 0 Septic 0 Low Voltage 0 Shutters 0 Mechanical ar: 0 Permit by Affidavit 12 ructural Qualifier Acknowledgement of Revision Submittal COMPANY NAME: ` (`'v, k- > � t, 1 01 C j STATE LICENSE NO: C- 6 L - _) 1%' QUALIFIER'S NAME(PRINT): - c, 5 J r k s7 QUALIFIER'S SIGNATUREr-- o,"ar Pie 4 �% CAROM RUIN STACHU.RA STATE OF: _ COUNTY OF: ,� t.+� * MY COMMISSION#PF 093307 ,, .�ii'..:p EXPIRES:FebJ fyle,2018 SWORN TO(OR AFFIRMED)AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THISO,�J7 /_ ( 4rFof,d0 Bonded Thal;Budget N h genloet WHO IS PERSONALLY KNO N: ORAS PRODUCED ID TYPE OF ID: NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATU• :_At (SEAL) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW.FOR STAFF USE ONLY INSPECTIONS NEEDED: ADDITIONAL FEES: Building: $ Fire: $ 11/1/14-PMR Date: Days Review: # Set of Plans: 8 A COLLIER COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT REVISION F I Growth Management Division 12800 N.Horseshoe Drive,Naples Florida 34104 TEL: 239-252-2400 t/4rp I iesidential 1 or 2 Units(Single Family/Duplex) p Residential 3 or more Units(Multi-family) ❑ dinmer4O Permit No. \ ❑Contractor^ Owner Builder Job Address:3l'iJ /NP y.e� 4-Vc� za Mc- , . S(��` 1 (7� "S:1* I'‘ Company Name: • nk- F Parcel# Folio: Cq-1 5 `: �,.(.n(`'C �- w o Qualifier/Professional Name:. o d / a ¢ Contact Name:_ oC' / x 0 Address: /(7L 1r-� ,/7- 11 CO f< ca J 4 I—. as Owner's Name: �-? t-0 vl E.) - �Ne' 1� ‘ o z o " City: /9.14 "," State:72 Z.- Zip: 33 c\ \,,� Agent Submitting Revision:-:X7 St'..-IS PL.')K�� Phone 1") rFc,f - Fax: -�� E-mail Address:." .--E7,-�c'`'�627---ST'i-,�>\ t`c ;);"S i✓ice. C0y-1 ALL REVISIONS MUST BE"CLOUDED"WITH AN ITEMIZED LIST OF THE SCOPE OF WORK Note:Changes to any exterior portion of the building may result in an architectural review which may require an SDP amendment/change.Please clearly indicate any change to the facade and/or\ exterior of building.Additional Cost value must be greater than zero dollars($0). Description of Work: C ! \. ) r°(' ..)C r i Ne., c C 5\c \\ C: a Project Name: ,\ 'FQ . Additional Cost of Construction$: 1 Additional SQ.Ft.Living/Interior: 0 Additional SQ.Ft.Non Living/Exterior: 0 Check Trades Affected By Revision (check all applicable trades associated with revision) 0 Private Provider []Plumbing []Roofing 0 Electrical ll Septic 0 Low Voltage [l Shutters 0 Mechanical 0 Permit by Affidavit ►tructural `^ „_. Qualifier Acknowledgement of Revision Submittal \ COMP NAME: STATE LICENSE NO: ALIFIER'S NAME(PRINT): QUALIFIER'S SIGNATURE: STATE OF: COUNTY OF: 'z SWORN TO(OR AFFIRMED)AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS / / WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN: OR AS PRODUCED ID: , TYPE OF ID: NO 'RY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: (SEAL) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW.FOR STAFF USE ONLY INSPECTIONS NEEDED: ADDITIONAL - : :ui •Ing: $ Fire: $ 11/1/14-PMR Date: 3 - 4,1-3 Days Revi w \ #Set of Plans: ROUTE SHEET 8 A Performance Review } Residential t-•` Permit Number: PRBD20150928706 Permit Type: Revision - Building Submittal: 6 6 Revision Submittal Submittal In Person Method: 3 Fast Track: Simultaneous: Master Permit#: Sets: Private Provider: Expedited Review: Planning Project: Business Name: Job CONSTRUCT NEW HOME (DEMO PRBD20150617253) Description: 342 TRADEWINDS AVE LOT 11 4 bed/5.5 bath rm Details: 3/21/16 HOUSE PLANS ERRONEOUSLY SHOW#5 REBAR IN POOL, POOL PLANS CALL FOR#3, REVISION TO CLARIFY VIA ENGINEER'S LETTER/ECB Fire District: 11 North Naples Fire Bldg Code in FBC 5th Edition 2014 Effect: Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date Final Review 1 Day Review 3/21/2016 3/22/2016 Time Residential Review 3/21/2016 3/22/2016 4 / a 54 Other Applicable Reviews: Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date Entered by: edwardbouza Report Updated:06/29/2015 -Tonic 8h 7v...0T ALPHA ENGINEERING $114 Structural Engineering Consulting Civil Engineers March 23,2016 Collier County Government Growth Management Division/Planning and regulation 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 RE: 342 Tradewinds Ave. (Permit ft: PRBD20150928706) Attn: (City Officials) To Whom It May Concern: The following letter is to inform you of the following changes made to the 342 Tradewinds Ave Residence and that Alpha Engineering has made these changes and approves of them as follows: 1. The stair noted detail and side pool bench detail on sheet 57 are deleted from these structural plans. Should you have an questions please feel free to contact our office at anytime. 011111111///////f Sincerely, s.k .... s • ' .1* Harve :trauss, P.E. =*'/ Presi:ent �WE ALPHA ENGINEERING OF LEE COUNTY, INC. ��, � 0 ,• Q -77 ••• HS/SA �''��r�tlll il) , 6315 Presidential Court Suite 120 Fort Myers, FL 33919 PHONE (239) 267-7777 FAX (239) 267-7752 www.alphaleecounty.com 8A .'5g,iD'' ALPHA ENGINEERING Structural Engineering Consulting Civil Engineers March 14,2016 Collier County Government Growth Management Division/Planning and regulation 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 RE: 342 Tradewinds Ave.(Permit#: PR$D20150928706) Attn: (City Officials) To Whom It May Concern: The following letter is to inform you of the following changes made to the 2654 Shoreview Residence and that Alpha Engineering has made these changes and approves of them as follows: 1. All steel in pool shell will be changed to#3's. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact our office at anytime. Sincerely, jl eyStrauss, P.E. 99• *r resident • — • 5TAE ALPHA ENGINEERING OF LEE COUNTY, INC. �° /11/14 '��, • FOR IS) HS/SA 6315 Presidential Court Suite 120 Fort Myers, FL 33919 PHONE (239) 267-7777 FAX (239) 267-7752 www.alphaleecounty.com BUILDING nEPT LI,P4q3 olyelg fil47-7r4r," (r1421.9.-e, 6 u Thin plan shall be et :he ift during Irmp-ac-tons _ - iingincyjrinc: _ - -- (Ft 4C) \ LS-1261U Tr)(° 8A *44444j1,431 '" ALPHA ENGINEERING Structural Engineering Consulting Civil Engineers June 9, 2016 • Collier County Government Growth Management Division/Planning and regulation 2800 N.Horseshoe Dr. Naples,FL 34104 RE: 342 Tradewinds Ave. (Permit#: PRBD20150928706) Atte: (City Officials) To Whom It May Concern: The three(3)rear lanai beams spanning 16'6, 22' and 12"are to be 12"x 16"4000 psi concrete beams with 3 #5's top and 5#7's bottom and#3 stirrups at 6"on center. The two (2)lanai beams running North and South spanning 15'6 and 11'that support the wet deck are to be 12"x 16"4000 psi concrete with 3 #5's top and 4 #7's bottom with stirrups at 7"on center Should you have any questions please feel free to contact our office at anytime. Sincerely, H y Strauss,P.E. - � , 1 . President 9 �r � OF ALPHA ENGINEERING OF LEE COUNTY, INC. s-�` yC. .` HS/SA, rirrrt 6315 Presidential Court Suite 120 Fort Myers, FL 33919 PHONE (239) 267-7777 FAX (239) 267-7752 www.alphaleecounty.com r- ? n . Bnq25-706 1, A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF LOT 11, BLOCK"M", UNIT No. 2, CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 17, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD. 0-1 Fv.B M 8 b15G "PRA 9667'' 1215' (1g ) 1215.12' (M ) 0 0.1" W.,NAVD ELEV. - 02.88 rn PD.NAIL iN . PVMt.GUT•ItOLE ( TRADE WINDS AVE , ( ,-- 760' 00 760.07'(C) -- -,, I 11J — - --- --V�-- o---- — —-o — A' ---,,--41-.. --- i 75.01 , i F .PK NAIL IN PV/LIT. ' 50.0' > I i CUT-MOLE, 0.06'W ' FD NAIL SAAPT r EDGE OF PvMT. IN PVMT. GUT- "z---11C�pNGGp Q c O . GON , HOLE O In! m ca M 1 —,I O 12' R.G. flo WVrn 588°04' 10"W 75.00'(R) 75.0I'CC) ►,Qsp P5M 5762 M Q , D WM oA FIR 0.52'S 0.29.E. * .J 0.03'N.10.07'W. 4"PM STUB- OUT on• Ntn C O �r Cr �m m m W Z ^(7.65', '''1(7---;57) Q � V 24.0' m 14.0( 7.65 0 0 8.05`in. -.65'4' o N d co SO ciA 9.0' ik co d; .o 342 TRADE WIMPS AVE. i BLOCK N C.E3.S. 1•10USE (under cont:L.) r.Lr PIN. FLOOR ELEV. +10.4 r o m Lo co w it 0 20.6' u. In 2.05' w: 5' 1::.in -i0 `n u, 4; 15.0' 4.35'6' `n u. - 0.8' 1 ') ' [- 1 0 SET DRiLLUOLE ' IN TOP OF CONC. SEAWALL . IIIGlI LEV. +03.31 76.�I L59x' 4' .:S.RETAINING WALL ALUM. FENCE NAVD E 11 - �. . L I WA 1...L., lT ik`-' .3S' WIDE CONC. 5EAWALL CAP o - 1a4' •—• 588°04'10'W 75.00'(R) 75.01'(M) �- o,n m 5ET DRILLI4OLE 1NTOP OF CONC. SEAWALL FIAV17 ELEV. + 03.32 W A .r ER W A Y SCALE: 1"=20' P.C.P. = PERMANENT CONTROL POINT BEARINGS BASED ON:r TRAVE•WIND'S AVE..AS 68B°04'l0"k�14 PI^R RECORD PLA 9- 5 -15 0815025 C010-52 VAGQNT/NAVD ELEV' P.R.M. - PERMANENT REFERENCE ELEVATIONS BASED ON:NAVD 1988 (OR16.oN FL DNF COL 29 1984 BSM DATE ORDER FiELD BOOK REVISIONS MONUMENT SIR - srr IRON Rod' LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE: AE (to') 5-19- 16 0516015 COLO 52 FOUNDATION/EL81 GtrR OMNI sURVEYS PER F.I.R.M. DATED: 5.16.2012 12021 G 0189 N SIR#4 �W S�E/T 4 IRON ROD CONC OMNI SURVEYS' CERTIFICATE C.M. CRETE MONUMENT I hereby FOUND IRON ROD certify that the above sketch correctly N&( ) NAIL & (T-TIN,D-DISK) represents a land survey mode by me or under my FD. •• FOUND direct supervision and meets the minimum technical VALID R = RECORD standards as set forth by the Florida Board of ONLY - MEASURED Professional Land Surveyors in Ch5J-17.050-5J-17.052FL CD - DEED CALCULATED Administrative Code, Pursuant to Section 472.027, Florida WITH Statutes. I further certify that it is only for the lands INC.6) DRAINAGE EASEMENT EMBOSSED OMNI SURVEYS, INC. PUE = PUBLIC UTiLfiY EASEMENT herein described and is valid only with the raised SEAL WM WATER= METER embossed surveyor's seal of the undersigned, It is not a WV= WATER VALVE certification of Title, Zoning or freedom of encumbrances FH - FIRE HYDRANT LB 6584 MH - MANHOLE (SS-SAN,STS=STORM) RCP - REINFORCth CONCRETE PIPE ��/ CMP = CORRUGATED METAL PIPE ` / Jr1 / ,/ TEL (239) 939-3666 ME — MTiERED END LI/ G� r/��/,(� SA Dock and Seawall Permit Application And Permit 8 A Coer Covzn tv OCT 252015 EXTENSION FORM By Date: //)--,,?5- Permit#: (2k' 6,2t,1.SUg 1v10.?36/ / p Primary Permit#(if required):1*6!)O/6" 451766 Contractor: ()legis()t1C i1 / Cl/11?� CAW True Wan Phone#: )V C_66-k-67 Address: 027/`7/ )i/-Cfb3(IocI! LM. t ,7)A-2 1-ii't . FL 3Y/ss- Contractor's Y/3SContractor's E-mail Address: ///43t�Or((L C17'ICir//1 e. Co-r) Q Owner's name: XCu ii' 5/bile- 19-31(t,_Job Address: Jl itc/eaf/r1 c-/ Ave_ / J Permit Description: N ai sc.,u Ou /1 i de k1 fi 1I IL/L L��C'7/iC Permit Expiration Date: /1-/ Has work commenced yet? YES Reason for extension: 11)z-11111e p/t �7DU5� Estimate time of extension: 9 C'�«"f J� No.of other extensions: / (MAXIMUM 90 DAYS) (MAXIMUM 3 EXTENSIONS ALLOWED) SignatureLicensetontract alifier Print name of Licensed Contractor/Qualifier r li) /•mac. Oil cX'Ti ' J • State of Florida �} County �t g� Sworn to and subscrriibbed_before` orme this ,7(5 day of ()CIO`IO he/' c 6 i- By: ())f-, f)i�_-_lam (L4-Personally known ( )Produced Identification Type of Identification ",,, HOLLY LINDSLY Signature of Notary Public . o• ,q 1,4.04v. Notary Public-State ol Honda (j/j/ y� Commission#FF 969598 „t teaMy Comm.Expires Jon 29.2020 r i "° °' Bonded through National Notary Assn Extension granted Permit extension period qv - - - - - - - - - - - - Extension denied Reason for denial Collier County Fax No: (239)252-6318 '\1 V E-mail: GMDPermitExtennion@tcolliergov.net JB ENGINEERING 11338 Bonita Beach Rd. SE Suite 103 OF Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 S.W. FL, INC. Engineering Business # 28318 (239) 949-0030 Fax (239) 948-7486 E-Mail: jj@jbengswfl.com December 16, 2015 To: Collier County Building Department 2800 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 FILE Re: Seawall Replacement 342 Tradewinds Ave. Collier County, FL Application#: PRBD20150412083 CERTIFICATION I have inspected the replacement seawall for this project and certify that it has been completed in accordance with our approved permit drawings ( our job # JB-15-GO-056 ) and the requirements of Ordinance# 85-2 (Collier County). Respectfully submitt 1,//4 j0 41r 1- Q S 'AfcO tzl 5 � QZ& Joseph J. qv bass': '•, . . Fla. Cert. # 00702 8 A Nov 12 1511:47a Greg Orick Marine 2393012238 p.1 Co e-- County .,..,-----,----k,„„.,_,---.., EXTENSION FORM Date: 1/- /,D -/.15 qq Permit#: /�kf f�'/)a.�?l Ci G/1 D g C3 PrimaryPermit#(if re uired j 1(-b 1 t? "l2-01 l Dig /�� 4 � i- Contractor:��10��j-,;��C��Q�1i7P �F1r7�S�ii:tC�/c.�: Phone#: %i/ .,fc-W Address: `7%-2/ D l/i-C-Y:=CX.f 01-ii' &iv2rr115 /SL' Contractor's E-mail Address: ii2/1.) -iC n�2;ii7P ,LGrT? t 3�i Owner's name: RI'X6-nne _57;e-Cne- Je5,1=e Job Address: .5j'Io? 7fCLdea..=;nSSs. A 1,41 Permit Description: A`£!6.43 '-el ja1 f Q'cc k, /t c- IIIL cit E/e4-it Permit Expiration Date: 10 - 3 i-J$- Has work commenced yet? ' • Reason for extension: /r) ('f%/it/J/Q/f iciL9I, i /7&f�/t C' Lt.:4 C (� n e-7-.) ja_d (p45 Lt' a_i t' . i Estimate time of extension: C/C) dit., 5 No.of other extensions: (MAXIMUM 90 DAYS) (MAXIMUM 3 EXTENSIONS ALLOWED) Signature ficensed ontractor/Qualifier Print name of Licensed Contractor/Qualifier st-,a, ya./ ___._ Q 0/1c"._it State of Florida County C• e Sworn to and subscribed before me this /02 day of N v her , ,V(�f5— By: (- f(29 OP C. ( sonall known y ( }produced Identification Type of Identification Signature of No ary Public: APIC.,,, HOLLY LINDSl.b/ -, 40_714, % ;?# Momm &p292D1$`� Notary Public-State of Florida ? ` f ;,,'..APs Commission r#EE 194085 Extension granted Permit extension period ',J°f.los Bonded Through National Notary Assn. I Extension denied Reason for denial Collier County Fax No: (239)252-6318 E-mail: GMDPermitExtension@coliiergov.net N V FI 1.---F* JB ENGINEERING 11338 Bonita Beach Rd. SE Suite 103 OF Bonita Springs, Florida 34135 S.W. FL, INC. Engineering Business # 28318 (239) 949-0030 Fax (239) 948-7486 E-Mail: jj@jbengswfl.com February 3, 2016 To: Collier County Building Department 2800 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Re: Seawall Replacement 342 Tradewinds Avenue Collier County, FL Application#: PRBD20150412083 CERTIFICATION I have inspected the replacement seawall for this project and certify that it has been completed in accordance with our approved permit drawings (our job # JB-15-GO-056 ) and the requirements of Ordinance# 85-2 (Collier County). Respttfi1l submitted, ' `N V : ESE 07 q /? '.\> /1 'Ai Q eO Jo501t :::. 0 i ' 14/ lic 7::: sem; F ‹e+0'' .... L ` P4`3 `\2-3-16 Y. Jo Jilt.j fti .ssaro, P.E. Fla. Cert. # 50702 COLLIER COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 8 A Growth Management Division I 2800 N.Horseshoe Drive,Naples,Florida 34104 TEL: 239-252-2400 Please fold plans with the plain side out. Ensure documents are stapled inside each set ofplans. Iesidential 1 or 2 Units(Single Family/Duplex) 0 Residential 3 or more Units(Multi-family)[]Commercial Permit No. e 41 k. A AO Z2eS Master Permit No. Parcel/Folio: '1 6q15-6.14)0040? n �ntractor �esign Professional Downer Builder Job Address: gLiLid._ TrcdeW; ds f'rt-i? 6F License#State Cert/Reg.-Prefix: C #: 9 / �t Owner's Phone No.:(105) 3'/3-q-/JT Company Name: (ter 'atici2r Haring lei . rtc . C Owner's Name: Was t/ i ie�perQualifier/Professional Qualifier/Professional Nxme: C%e O.J L. . dtf G F L @@ Lot: / l Block: Unit9-- z Contact Name: eT9GOhc, . Address: g Subdivision:,33>Cc-Corivei t,de, 6i`it o?'7/'7/ I2 icfiy J>/ve 0 Township: Range: 2- Section: / y City 60 17,1� State: FLZip: ... 0 3jC — c FEMA: BFE: Flood Zone: Phon- 1.1 ' a Fax, 39•go/,,Z2-38 E- ZSDP/PL: E-mail Address: /»1Gl Of/CRrkiat/i?e a CO")-) Code Case: COA U DAlteration =Mechanical =Clean Agent System =LP Gas z =Convenience Book DMobile Home w =Fire Alarm =Pre-Engineered Fire q =Demo =New Construction eg QFire Alarm Monitoring DSuppression F =Door/Window DOPlumbing l F =Fire Pumps Standpipes F DElectric/Low Voltage Pool 4, 7 OFire Sprinkler System =Spray Booths CZ DElectric from House =Re-roof W g Fossil Fuel Storage System QTents U Fence ®Screen Enclosure a, a.. DHoods DUnderground Fire Lines P Shutter E- F [urine DSign/Flagpole E- OTHER =Solar ri)R' DZ Provider =Plumbing z QNon-sprinkled (Sprinkled led O =Roofing [-iectrical / q� a U D Septic El Low Voltage a is, DIA DIB El HA ORBU v' 0 Shutters 0 Mechanical E- F D ORM DIVA ( IVB o D ' • G =Permit by Affidavit C VA VB i/ j U U J Occupancy CIassification(s): Description of Work: , ' 3 ec LI-7 G a r __ 1 c • e(e c-( r t z o D Project Name: CS.h.co K�pe r Declared Value$: I 51 Q c O NEW CONSTRUCTION/ADDITION AREA ALTERATION WORK AREA- SQ.FT, z E-, If applicable: #Stories/Floors: #Units: #Tons: URESIDENTIAL: #Bedrooms: #Baths: Living: Non-living: a RESIDENTIAL: Living. Non-living: ,,fo2.. Total sq.ft.: ,..)-7.9.....t/ TOTAL SQ.FT.: ea COMMERCIAL: COMMERCIAL: Interior: Exterior: #Fixtures: Interior: Exterior: Total: TOTAL SQ.FT.: SEWAGE: cv'-a 0 Septic D Ave Maria DCity of Naples =Collier County D Golden Gate City D Immokalee D Orange Tree 0 Other F WATER SUPPLY: F.? =Well 0 Ave Maria DCity ofNaples =Collier County Q Golden Gate City 0 Immokalee D Orange Tree=Other Application/Plans Discrepancies-Customer Acknowledgement of possible rejection for the following missed information: 1. Square footage discrepancies 2.Occupancy Classification/Construction type not provided 3.Required documents not certified 4.Incomplete Plan Sets or Drawings 5.Sets not identical ``1 Nov.L 2014-PMR Date: ` /Z� Days Review- * Set of Plans: QUALIFIERS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COLLIER COUNTY REGULATIONS Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. The permit or application fee may have additional fees imposed for failing to obtain permits prior to commencement of construction. The approved permit and/or permit application expires if not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance. The permittee further understands that only licensed contractors may be employed and that the structure will not be used or occupied until a certificate of occupancy is issued. By signing this permit application, I agree that I have been retained by the owner/permittee to provide contracting services for the trade for which I am listed. Furthermore, it is my responsibility to notify the Building Review and Permitting De partment should I no longer be the contractor responsible for providing said contracting services. I further agree that I understand that the review and issuing of this permit does not exempt me from complying with all County Codes and Ordinances. It is further understood that the property owner/permittee is the owner of the permit. Note: If change of contractor, please provide the following: Permit Number: E-mail Address: Tel: COMPANY NAME: 611"e jO,/C./C.1�. 11/a/74€' ( ii.._f!'r'.STATE LICENSE NO: CvleS�9 J QUALIFIER'S NA it (PRINT): eacr )ii L�( QUALIFIER'S SIG `i j�a, &al STATE OF: f—r L, COUNTY OF: Le i° SWORN TO(OR AFFIRMED)AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS 2" / / d2�/c5 WHO IS PERSONALLY KNOWN: i— OR AS PRODUCED ID: ;•,, r pu'•, HOMY LINDSLY ro �vb Notary Public-State of Florida TYPE OF ID: czh ;;,. •=My Comm.Expires Jun 29,2016 .; .o'oo-s' Commission 0 EE 194085 NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: < "'"" Bonde. vipit ational Notary Assn._ NOTICE IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT, THEE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROPERTY THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY, AND THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL PERMITS REQUIRED FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES SUCH AS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT,STATE AGENCIES,OR FEDERAL AGENCIES. WARNING OF POSSIBLE DEED RESTRICTIONS THE LAND SUBJECT TO THIS PERMIT MAY BE SUBJECT TO DEED, AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS THAT MAY LIMIT OR IMPAIR THE LANDOW NER'S RIGHTS. COLLIER COUNTY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THESE RESTRICTIONS, NOR ARE COLLIER COUNTY EMPLOYEES AUTHORIZED TO PROVIDE LEGAL OR BUSINESS ADVICE TO THE PUBLIC RELATIVE TO THESE RESTRICTIONS. THE LANDOWNER OR ANY APPLICANT ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE LANDOWNER IS CAUTIONED TO SEE K PROFESSIONAL ADVICE. WARNING ON WORK IN COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAYS THIS PERMIT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALL ATION OF ANY STRUCTURE OR UTILITY, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND, WITHIN ANY RIGHT-OF-W AY OR EASEMENT RESERVED FOR ACCESS, DRAINAGE OR UTILITY PURPOSES. THIS RESTRICTION SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITS FENCING, SPRINKLER SYSTEMS, LANDSCAPING OTHER TH AN SOD, SIGNS, W ATER, SEWER, CABLE AND DRAINAGE WORK THEREIN. IF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS ARE NECESSARY, A SEPARATE PERMIT FOR THAT PURPOSE MUST BE OBTAINED FROM TRANSPORTATION/ROW PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS(239)252-8192 WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY f3EFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Per Florida Statutes 713.135 a Notice of Commencement(NOC)is required for construction of improvements totaling more than$2,500,with certain exceptions.For AIC Repairs or Replacements a notice of commencement is required for improvements more than$7,500. The applicant shall file with the issuing authority prior to the first inspection eithera certified copy of the recorded NOC or a notarized statement that the NOC has been filed for recording,along with a copy thereof_In orderto comply with the state requirement,permits will be placed in inspection hold until proof of the NOC is filed with the building permitting and inspection department The issuing authority shall not perform or approve subsequent inspections until the applicantfiles by mail,facsimile,hand delivery,email or any other means such certified copy with the issuing authority. 8 A Permit# CiO IE�Y �OLtYit� Growth Management Division Planning & Regulation Building Review SUBCONTRACTOR AFFIRMATION To be completed by the qualifier working under the General Contractor. (Circle One Below) Electrical Plumbing / Mechanical / Roofing / Septic I Other Company Name i gre_C3cr, c_ __i•--krt r iree_ Ulm L1-1( State License# EL 13cX 59q4._ q4- Qualifier's Name Zi,e-r--F 3 614 r Qualifier's Signature Contractor's Phone#0-3q, t/3 1 a Email 1 lTC CLe I � cc s s I r\o Jobsite Address 3- Ql "+c�°.Ac-, A)c. • .1\-‘0..f)\ S Name of General Contractor for Project 1 1 31`N k IL_ C - *• 1 r Attention: Knowingly providing false information to obtain a permit to practice construction contracting is a violation of Florida Statute 489.129 and 489.533 STATE OF orx(IA COU11 OF (I L(e,- SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF rI ,20_1S7 NOTARY PUBLIC(CHECK ONE): PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME PRODUCED I.D. TYPE OF ID PRODUCED SIGN 7AlidAimill „,,,,,,,.,.„„ �h _'�`'I MATTHEW NEVILLE HANSARD PRINT 00, OTAFdJfI (�ISSIpN#FF175871 Eo? EXPIRES ,2018 ., (a07(ase-Ot53 FloridallotaryService.comNovember13 ryY� 13 A *** INSTR 5105110 OR 5137 PG 3547 RECORDED 4/8/2015 10:42 AM PAGES 1 *** DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $10.00 >' SCANNED .rte_ State of FLORIDA County of Collier Permit No. Tax Folio No. G2 /5-8ScQ nmn? I HEREBY corrct CERTIFYcopof Ta this is a true and ey adocument recorded NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT in the OFFICIAL RECORDS of Collier County State of FLORIDA WITNESS my hand and official seal County of COLLIER date,4/8/2015 DWIG`B O e LERK OF CIRCUIT COURT The undersigned hereby gives notice that improvement will be made to certain real property,and In accordance with Chapter 713,Florida Statutes, r 'A the following Information is provided In this Notice of Commencement BY:��.,_ "= D.C. �� 1.Des 'prion of Pyope :(lega description QQf the'rope ,and street addrerss if%ilabl- A'' 4I4 0i7.- ` i 1 OC. .GL/� 4► 2. General description of improvement: o _ �,, f�drs;�oo„ hrS � T , : 3. Owner Information: a. Name and address: Thea ay goeyo,r ,�y� a'oinds Avg. /140e5, AZ 3Y(63 b. Interest in property: 0 APT- c. Name and address of fee simple titleholder(d different from Owner fisted above): 4.a� Ontractor:(na e a d ad. -ss) , A b. Con.- tor's phone number:A3 . d'i �Z-•� a4..... r/ �� a:�-' r�T 5. Surety(if applicable,a copy of the payment bond is attached): 37 3J^ a. Name and Address: b. Phone number: . c. Amount of bond: • . 6a. Lender:(name and address) b. Lender's phone number: 7. Persons within the State of Florida Designated by Owner upon whom notices or other documents may be served as provided by Section 713.13(1)(a)7.,Florida Statutes: a. Name and address: b. Phone numbers of designated persons: 8a. In addition to himself or herself,Owner designates to receive a copy of Uenor's Notice as provided In Section 713.13(1)(b)Florida Statutes.of------------- b. Phone number of person or entity designated by owner: 9. Expiration date of notice of commencement(the eviration date may not be before the completion of construction and final payment to the contractor,but will be 1 year from the date of recording unless a different date is specified) WARNING TO OWNER: ANY PAYMENTS MADE BY THE OWNER AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT ARE CONSIDERED IMPROPER PAYMENTS UNDER CHAPTER 713.PART I,SECTION 713.13,FLORIDA STATUTES,AND CAN RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY.A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION.iF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING,CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE COMMENCING WORK OR RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Under•: alty of perju I declare that i have read the foregoing to the •12, of my kn•,• edge and belief. notice of commencement and that the facts stated therein are true % IIatL . _ •r••*,ers or Lessee's Authorized Officer/Director/Partner/manager) (Sgnatory's Title/Office) the foregoing -frame -s acknowledged before me this n (year),by N f '2 day of !7r ty officer,trustee,attorney in fact)for S (name of person)as nsb � A' a.' (name of party behalf of whom i (type ofument waas saueexxeecucutteedd)).. DWIGHT E BROCK,CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT a,,. .(Signature of Deputy Clerk) /. 1 /a i (Signature of Nota• Public-State of Fl.ride) (Printed name of Deputy lerk) (Print,Type,or stampCommissioned Name of Notary Public) Personally Known OR Produced Identification •""""' Type of Identification Produced .; HOLLY LINDSLY rt. `t• Notary Comm.PuEx ires- of Rev. 11!2011 . ••`My m.Expires Jun 29,2016 -, 4'Bonded Thro Commission I EE 191085 -'••?: .s;. ",�.�^"' uph Nstionst Not Assn. 8A ROUTE SHEET Performance Review Residential Permit Number: PRBD20150412083 Permit Type: Marine Submittal: 1 1 Initial Submittal 04/20/2015 Submittal In Person Method: 2 Fast Track: Simultaneous: Master Permit#: Sets: Private Provider: Expedited Review: Planning Project: Business Name: Job NEW SEAWALL, DOCK, BOATLIFT, AND ELECTRIC Description: 342 TRADEWINDS AVE Details: Fire District: 11 North Naples Fire Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date Final Review 5 Day Review 4/20/2015 4/27/2015 Time Environmental Review 4/20/2015 4/23/2015 FEMA Review 4/20/2015 4/23/2015 A d-4\2.4‘ (s' Residential Review 4/20/2015 4/23/2015 .4 Afse y\.i,4 `tom Zoning Review 4/20/2015 4/23/2015 Other Applicable Reviews: Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date (S COO cbL Entered by: SamanthaGibson I • 8 A ROUTE SHEET Performance Review Residential Permit Number: PRBD20150412083 Permit Type: Marine Submittal: 1 1 Initial Submittal 04/20/2015 Submittal In Person Method: 2 Fast Track: Simultaneous: Master Permit#: Sets: Private Provider: Expedited Review: Planning Project: Business Name: Job NEW SEAWALL, DOCK, BOATLIFT, AND ELECTRIC Description: 342 TRADEWINDS AVE Details: Fire District: 11 North Naples Fire Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date Final Review 5 Day Review 4/20/2015 4/27/2015 Time V/ Environmental Review 4/20/2015 4/23/2015 r T(16/ FEMA Review 4/20/2015 4/23/2015 Residential Review 4/20/2015 4/23/2015 Zoning Review 4/20/2015 4/23/2015 ,() Other Applicable Reviews: 1 Review In Date Group/PMR Status Reviewer Comments: Fee$ Date Entered by: SamanthaGibson 8 A FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF S _ ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION c. BOB MARTINEZ CENTER tea? 2600 BLMRSTONE ROAD TALLAHASSEE,FLORIDA 32399-2400 SELF CERTIFICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A PRIVATE,RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY DOCK Self Certification File No.: 0333782001EE File Name: 342 Tradewinds Ave Naples,FL 34108 - Self Cert Exempt Dock with Boat Lift(s) (General) Dear GREG ORICK II: On, 04/01/2015,you used the Department's electronic Self Certification Process to certify compliance with the terms and conditions necessary for construction of a private, residential single-family dock, at a detached, single-family residence located at: LAT-Degrees: 26 Minutes: 15 Seconds: 41.8644 LONG-Degrees: -81 Minutes: 49 Seconds: 11.4482 SITE ADDRESS: 342 Tradewinds Ave Naples,FL 34108 COUNTY: Collier For: Nancy Koeper 342 Tradewinds Ave Naples,FL 34108 You have certified that the dock you propose to construct at the above location meets all the conditions of the Self Certification Process. A dock that is built in conformance to those conditions(attached for reference) will: 1. Qualify for a regulatory exemption under Part IV of Chapter 373 and Section 403.813(2)(b)of the Florida Statutes, and Chapters 62-330, and 62-343 of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). As such, it is exempt from the need to obtain a DEP Environmental Resource Permit. 2. Qualify for a consent by rule to use submerged lands under Chapter 253 of the Florida Statutes and Chapter 18-21 of the Florida Administrative Code,when the dock is located on submerged lands owned by the State of Florida. Your Self Certification is based solely on the information you provided under this process, and applies only 8A to the statutes and rules in effect when your certification was completed. The certification is effective only for the specific dock proposed, and only if the dock is constructed, operated, and maintained in conformance with all the terms, conditions, and limitations stated in the Self Certification Process.In addition,any substantial modifications in your plans should be submitted to the Department for review, as changes may result in a permit being required. You have acknowledged that this Self Certification will automatically expire if: 1. Construction of the dock is not completed within one year from the self certification date; 2. site conditions materially change; 3. the terms, conditions,and limitations of the Self Certification are not followed; or 4. the governing statutes or rules are amended before construction of the project. Completion of the Self Certification constitutes your authorization for Department personnel to enter the property for purposes of inspecting for compliance. Receipt of this Self Certification constitutes letter of consent required by rule 18-21.004(7)F.A.C. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This Self Certification Process does not relieve you from the responsibility of obtaining other permits or authorizations from other agencies(federal, state,Water Management District,or local)that may be required for the project. Construction of the dock may require federal authorization. The Corps has been furnished a copy of your Self Certification letter. They will contact you with further information about their process. If you do not hear from them,please contact them directly. Jacksonville District contact information can be found at: http:/;'wwv .saj.usace.army.miliMissions,%Reaulatory.aspx. Failure to obtain all applicable authorizations prior to construction of the dock may result in enforcement. If you have any questions,please contact your local Department District Office. Contact information can be found at: http:: v, dep.state.ti.LIS lNA,aterr'wetlands%docs lsler_contacts.pdf. When referring to your project, please use the Self Certification file number listed above. Sincerely, Florida Department of Environmental Protection Enclosures: Single Family Dock Criteria General Conditions for Soverignty/State-Owned Submerged Lands Authorization Manatee Conditions Private residential single family docks are subject to the following criteria in accordance with Section 403.813(1)(b),F.S. The dock to be constructed: 1. Has 1,000 square feet or less over water surface(includes adjacent wetlands) in accordance with Chapter 62-340, F.A.C.; 2. Is constructed on or held in place by pilings and is constructed so as not to involve filling or dredging other than that necessary to install the pilings; 3. Will not substantially impede the flow of water,cause water pollution, or create a navigational hazard; 4. Is used ONLY for recreational,noncommercial activities associated with the mooring or storage of boats and boat paraphernalia; 8 A 5. Is the sole dock on the parcel; and 6. Must not be subject to any conservation easement or restrictive covenant of record prohibiting the activity. Boat lifts are subject to the following additional conditions: 1. Is to be installed in an existing slip or, at or adjacent to the waterward end of the dock; 2. With other mooring will not result in the mooring of more than two vessels(including jet skis); 3. Will not be located in areas prohibited for mooring by a previously issued permit or other form of authorization issued by a local government; General Conditions for Soverignty/State-Owned Submerged Lands Authorization Any use of sovereignty/state-owned submerged lands is subject to the following general conditions that are binding upon the applicant and are enforceable under Chapters 253 or 258, F.S.: 1. Sovereignty/state-owned submerged lands may be used only for the specified activity or use. Any unauthorized deviation from the specified activity or use and the conditions for undertaking that activity or use will constitute a violation. Violation of the authorization will result in suspension or revocation of the applicant's use of the sovereignty/state-owned submerged lands unless cured to the satisfaction of the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund(Board). 2. Authorization under Rule 18-21.005, F.A.C., conveys no title to sovereignty/state-owned submerged lands or water column,nor does it constitute recognition or acknowledgment of any other person's title to such land or water. 3. Authorizations under Rule 18-21.005,F.A.C., may be modified, suspended or revoked in accordance with its terms or the remedies provided in Sections 253.04,F.S. or Chapter 18-14, F.A.C. 4. Structures or activities will be constructed and used to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to resources. 5. Construction,use, or operation of the structure or activity will not adversely affect any species which is endangered,threatened or of special concern, as listed in Rules 68A-27.003,68A-27.004, and 68A-27.005,F.A.C. 6. Structures or activities will not unreasonably interfere with riparian rights. When a court of competent jurisdiction determines that riparian rights have been unlawfully affected,the structure or activity will be modified in accordance with the court's decision. 7. Structures or activities will not create a navigational hazard. 8. Structures will be maintained in a functional condition and will be repaired or removed if they become dilapidated to such an extent that they are no longer functional. 9. Structures or activities will be constructed, operated, and maintained solely for water dependent 8A purposes. 10. The applicant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Board and the State of Florida from all claims, actions, lawsuits and demands in any form arising out of the authorization to use sovereignty/state-owned submerged lands or the applicant's use and construction of structures on sovereignty/state-owned submerged lands. This duty to indemnify and hold harmless will include any and all liabilities that are associated with the structure or activity including special assessments or taxes that are now or in the future assessed against the structure or activity during the period of the authorization, 11. Failure by the Board to enforce any violation of the authorization or waiver by the Board of any provision of the authorization will not invalidate the provision not enforced or waived,nor will the failure or waiver prevent the Board from enforcing the waived or unenforced provision in the event of a future violation of that provision. 12. Applicant binds itself and its successors and assigns to abide by the provisions and conditions set forth in the authorization. If the applicant or its successors or assigns fails or refuses to comply with the provisions and conditions of the authorization,the authorization may be terminated by the Board after written notice to the applicant or its successors or assigns.Upon receipt of such notice, the applicant or its successors or assigns will have thirty(30) days in which to correct the violations. Failure to correct the violations within this period will result in the automatic revocation of this authorization. 13. All costs incurred by the Board in enforcing the terms and conditions of the authorization will be paid by the applicant. Any notice required by law will be made by certified mail at the address shown on page one of the authorization. The applicant will notify the Board in writing of any change of address at least ten days before the change becomes effective. 14. This authorization does not allow any activity prohibited in a conservation easement or restrictive covenant of record that prohibits the activity. Manatee Conditions The following conditions are intended to protect manatees from direct project effects; THESE CONDITIONS APPLY ONLY IN WATERS THAT ARE ACCESSIBLE TO MANATEES: 1. All personnel associated with the project will be instructed about the presence of manatees and manatee speed zones, and the need to avoid collisions with and injury to manatees. The permittee will advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming,harassing, or killing manatees which are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act,the Endangered Species Act, and the Florida Manatee Sanctuary Act. 2. All vessels associated with the construction project will operate at"Idle Speed/No Wake" at all times while in the immediate area and while in water where the draft of the vessel provides less than a four-foot clearance from the bottom. All vessels will follow routes of deep water whenever possible. 3. Siltation or turbidity barriers will be made of material in which manatees cannot become entangled, will be properly secured, and will be regularly monitored to avoid manatee entanglement or entrapment. Barriers must not impede manatee movement. 4. All on-site project personnel are responsible for observing water-related activities for the presence of manatee(s). All in-water operations, including vessels,must be shutdown if a manatee(s) comes within 8 A 50 feet of the operation.Activities will not resume until the manatee(s)has moved beyond the 50-foot radius of the project operation, or until 30 minutes elapses if the manatee(s)has not reappeared within 50 feet of the operation. Animals must not be herded away or harassed into leaving. 5. Any collision with or injury to a manatee will be reported immediately to the FWC Hotline at 1-888-404-FWCC. Collision and/or injury should also be reported to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Jacksonville(1-904-731-3336) for north Florida or Vero Beach(1-772-562-3909) for south Florida. 6. Temporary signs concerning manatees will be posted prior to and during all in-water project activities. All signs are to be removed by the permittee upon completion of the project.Awareness signs that have already been approved for this use by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission(FWC) must be used(see MyFWC.com). One sign which reads Caution: Boaters must be posted. A second sign measuring at least 8 1/2"by 11" explaining the requirements for"Idle Speed/No Wake" and the shut down of in-water operations must be posted in a location prominently visible to all personnel engaged in water-related activities. http://www.collierappraiser.com/Main_Search/RecordDetail.html?Fol... Collier County Property Appraiser 8 A Property Summary Parcel No. 27585200007 Site Adr. 342 TRADEWINDS AVE Name/Address STONE-JESKE TR, ROXANNE B ROXANNE B STONE-JESKE TRUST UTD 8/10/05 531 TURTLE HATCH LN City NAPLES State FL Zip 34103-8538 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3A29 233800 M 113A29 29 48 25 0.21 Legal CONNER'S VANDERBILT BCH EST UNIT 2 BLK M LOT 11 Millage Area 0 154 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 233800 - CONNERS VANDERBILT BCH EST#2 School Other Total Use Code 0 8 - MULTI-FAMILY LESS THAN 10 UNIT 5.58 6.1776 11.7576 Latest Sales History 2014 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book-Page Amount Land Value $ 469,200 08/30/05 3878-2924 $ 0 (+) Improved Value $ 108,370 12/05/00 2750-3426 $ 549,000 (_) Market Value $ 577,570 01/19/98 2503-621 $ 0 08/01/87 1289-1542 $ 172,500 (-) 10% Cap $21,623 07/01/86 1206-999 $ 160,500 (_) Assessed Value $ 555,947 04/01/82 965-1203 $ 152,500 (_) School Taxable Value $ 577,570 (_) Taxable Value $ 555,947 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll of 1 3/31/2015 2:09 PM http://www.collierappraiser.com/Main Search/RecordDetail.html?Fol... Collier County Property Appraiser 8 A Property Aerial Parcel No. 27585200007 Site Adr. 342 TRADEWINDS AVE c� l am , -- � 4 —� `" -r;' • •� E , 1 i x*:®f5 "7. J•..=g- j, I a . ,,.s ., ri; ,.: . ,,, , -'- ' :. k it Iss � :t ' `� [ pL t. "Sly r - 4. ., „ d r ..i-~ �': Y .5 _._ S 4 ,_4.,_,,,, -.-`; V \ t �rn a �. 3 -- , . . :ie. ••.'„' ,.. -,...: ."- slra'.. „4,,,,A.•I i• - - 1 '2- ...,0&-"— - 4- , i.„,,,. .. ?~a J19, ti qv a Collier Co�unty_Property,Appraiser, Naples, F12,3/31/2015 2:0:16 PM 27585200007 of 1 3/31/2015 2:10 PM 8A HURRICANE BOAT LIFTS CATEGORY-5 VERTICAL LIFTS ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS , ,, , ,1 . i.--, ti 4, Ai.o: ,, ...,,,, 4., „r,„, -..,..,.., ..., IIIN. 0 © © t•I!,..,, 11 Ex lI UkIS.X2 FLAT PLATE E.B.D.0 �' DIRECT DRIVE \ GEAR GEAR \ 4' DIRECT DRIVEOPTION OPTIONOPTD3N I� \O I 1 © .IOPTION PILING SPACING , Oi�\� iNDED CAPLIACITY ft AB �PCOTGEhI� �, ,, c �� 4,500 LB I50' 132' B'To 30' D3A ir, \ I 7,000 LB 150' 144' B'To 10'DIA PlUng Penetration �� IIIA Q \ �I© ]0,000 LB 150' 150' 9'To ]0'DIA To Be 10' Into The II�I .....k.---",./%..J\ � 13,000 LB SSD' 350' 9.70 10'DIA Sand Bottom Or 5' Ail .I� 1 II 16.000 LB 150' I69' 9'To 10'DIA Into The Rock Strata A. / N 20,000 LB 168' 16B' 10'To 12' DIA'Recoruxnd A 'F 24,000 LB 192' 192' 10'To 12' DIA 6 Piles RUT-TO-WT $ A 007-TO-OUT B CENTER-TO-CURER II 60c0- 1 a 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 It. II Top 0 Cradles Bunk Guide Drive Flat Plt. E.B.D. H.S. U.H.SX2 Lift Bean per lift Board Cable Gear Gear Gear Gear Cap. Channel I-Bonn (PT) SIZe Post Benrings Shaft Motor Motor Motor Motor Sloe Size Carpeted Height SZe H.P. HP. H.P. HP, 2 Ea. 6'14 x 4'V - (2 Ea.> (2 Ea.) (2 Ea.) (2 Ea.) 4,500* 4H x IS x.29/19 (4) 3/4 HP. 3/4 H.P. 3/4 H.P. 1 1/2 H.P. 2Wx.23 132'! 5' 120/20A 120/206 120/20A 150'Lg. 4.03 Wt/Lin Ft. 5/16' 240/106 240/10A 240/10A 240/106 P � 2 La15 6'H x 4'V SST. (2 Ea.) (2 Ea.) (2 Es.) (2 Ea.) SH x x 35/21 /H.P. 1 H.P. 1 H.P.,000* 2.?256 W a 144' 8 1 Pa rt (5 Eo-) `n 1 1/2 H.P. 120206 120/.P. 120/20A 'I ' x 4.79 Vt/Lin Ft.2'x6'x144' tri 240/106 240/10A 240/10A 240/10A 150'Lg. 6'6' �' -" z Ln. 8'H x 5'V CARPETED 2'Solid ,, N (2 Ea.) (2 Eo.) (2 Es.) (2 Ea.) 6H x 17 o 35/23 a. 3/4 H.P. 3/4 H.P. 3/4 H.P. 10,000* 2. W x 150'! 1 3/2 H.P. x.29 120/20A 12020A 12020A Stainless Steel Piling Mount Bracket 150'L. 6.16 Wt./Lin Ft. (4) 6061-76 � 240/196 240/106 240/10A 240/10A With 2-3/8' Bolts Connecting The 76 En• 8'H x 5'V s u (2 Ea.) (2 Ea.) x 17 x 41/.25 5/16' ALUM. Bracket To The Assembly. 13,000* 2.75 V x 150'! io $ 1 H.P. 1 1/2 H.P. 2-3/8'x3' Stainless Steel Lag Bolts 150'9 LO.7.02 Vt/Lin Ft SST. a 240/196 (2 En.) 240/106 Into The Side OF Piling 2 La. 10'H x 6'V 3'x10'x144 y (2 E°') (2 Ea') 16,0006 3711x 10 x 168'2! 2 Part 11(P._ND 1 HP. 1 1/2 H.P. PILE MOUNT DETAIL u-10 '8.64 Yt./Lin Ft.Carpeted 240/ROA N/A 240/15* 1520' Lg. BH xa25 10'H 6'V 240/10A (2 Ea.> 20,000R 3.75 W x 41/25 3'x10'x168' (4) (6 Ea.) 112 H.P. x 168'! 1641 Lg.8.64 Vi/Lln Ft.Corpeted J 5/16' l0' 2'sou240/10A 2 En. 10'H x 6'V 6061-T6 N/A (2 En.) 8H�x 25 x 30/.29 3'x10•x192' SST. 24,000* x.41 W a 192' ! Carpeted ALUM. I I/2 HP. 192'LQ.10.28 VL/LIn Ft 3 Part 240/10A THE WORK SPECIFIED HEREIN HAS BEEN DESIGNED L ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STRUCTURAL PROVISIONS OF THE 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. NATE. THIS LIFTING STRUCTURE HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND WIND LOADS ASSOCIATED WITH WIND SPEEDS OF V,,a 180 BPH,V,sy =139 MPH(3 SEC.GUST)EXPOSURE'D' WITHOUT A BOAT ON TIE UFT PER ASCE 7-10 USING ABOVE GROUND SIGN/WALL METHOD,THE LIFTING STRUCTURE INCLUDING BOAT HAS BEEN DESIGNED TD WITHSTAND WIND SPEEDS OF V,,,,=90 MPH IN EXPOSURE'C' OR 80 MPH IN EXPOSURE 'D'. OWNER RESPONSIBLE TO REMOVE BOAT FROM LIFT DURING WINDSTORM EVENT IN EXCESS Vnad AS CALATED BELOW,PER FBC 3105.5.3 STRUCTURES DESIGNED TO BE READILY REMOVED 131 REPOSITIONED BURNING PERIODS OL HIGH WIND VELOCITY SHALL BE POSTED WITH A LEGIBLE AND READILY VISIBLE DECAL OR PAINTED INSTRUCTIONS TO BE THE OWNER ER TENANT TO REMOVE OR REPOSITION THE STRUCTURE OR PART THEREOF DURNING SUCH PERIODS OF TIME AS ARE DESIGNATED BY THE U.S.WEATHER BUREAU AS BEING A HURRICANE WARNING OR ALERT.THE LIFT OWNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF THESE CONDITIONS BY THE PERMIT HOLDER.NO WARRANTY,EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IS CONTAINED HEREIN.Vasd MAY DE CALCULATED BY THE FOLLOWING FORMULA.Vasd=J 0.6 5 Vult.DESIGN OF BOAT WIND LOADING HAS BEEN PERFORMED WITH THE FOLLOWING RATIOS AS CONFIRMED BY OTHERS.B/s=3,s/h s 0.75,FOR A Cf of 1.6 MAXIMUM WHERE H IS THE HEIGHT TO TOP OF BOAT, B IS HORIZONTAL DIMENSION,AND S IS VERTICAL DIMENSION. CERTIFICATION OF BOAT UFT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE AND ALL ELECTRICAL DR MECHANICAL CERTIFICATIONS ARE BY OTHERS,ENGINEER SEAL CERTIFIES ASSEMBLY OF LIFT ONLY. THIS DETAIL IS PREPARED AS A GENERAL NON-SITE SPECIFIC MASTER PLAN SHEET DETAIL TYPICAL FIELD CONDITIONS ARE ASSUMED IN THE DESIGN.WOOD PILES SHALL BE SEASONED WOOD WITH 0=0.55 OR BETTER.SHOULD ANY SPECIFIC LOCATION DIFFER FROM THAT SPECIFIED HEREIN,OR STANDARD FIELD CONDITIONS,ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC ENGINEERING MAY BE REQUIRED AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR AND PERMITTING CONTRACTOR.CARE SHALL BE TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR IN ALL APPLICATIONS OF THIS DETAIL AS THIS IS NOT A SITE SPECIFIC DRAWING,IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OTHERS TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF INSTALLATION TO THE HOST STRUCTURE. ALUMINUM MATERIAL.6061 T6 ALUMINUM ALL WELDS ARE MIN.1/4'FULL FILLET VELD USING 5556 FILLER ALLOY.ALL WELDING MUST CONFORM TO AISC STEEL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL 13TH ED AS INSPECTED AND VERIFIED BY OTHERS.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO INSULATE ALUMINUM MEMBERS FROM DISSIMILAR METALS TO PREVENT ELECTROLYSIS. FASTENERS ALL ANCHORS TO BE HILTI BRAND OR MFR EQUIVALENT.ALL BOLTS SHALL BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED,OR STAINLESS STEEL&MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A304 WITH HARDENED WASHERS AND HEX NUTS.WASHERS SHALL BE USED BETWEEN WOOD 6 BOLT HEAD L BETWEEN WOOD L NUT.WHERE GENERIC FASTENERS ARE LABELED IN DETAILS, CAPACITIES SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN HILTI KVIK DOLT U OR RED HEAD THRU BOLTS.EMBEDMENT DEPTHS SPECIFIED HEREIN ARE DEPTHS INTO SOLID SUBSTRATE AND DO NOT INCLUDE THICKNESS OF STUCCO OR OTHER FINISHES. ALUMINUM MEMBERS IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE AND WOOD SHALL BE PROTECTED BY'KOPPERS BITUMINOUS PAINT'OR POLYETHYLENE TAPE UWW (ULTRA HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT)11.7 nils(0.30 en)KIN.TOTAL THICKNESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.ALL WELDS PER FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. BIB CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.HAS NOT VISITED THIS.IDBSITE.INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS BASED ON CONTRACTOR SUPPLIED DATA AND MEASUREMENTS.B&B CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE IN ANY WAY FOR ERRONEOUS OR INACCURATE DATA DR MEASUREMENTS.WORK SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. BIB CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.SHALL BE NOTIFIED AND GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO REEVALUATE OUR WORK UPON DISCOVERY OF ANY INACCURATE INFORMATION PRIOR TO MODIFICATION OF EXISTING FIELD CONDITIONS AND FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. ENGINEERING SEAL AFFIXED HERETO VALIDATES STRUCTURAL DESIGN AS SHOWN ONLY.USE OF THIS SPECIFICATION BY CONTRACTOR,et nL INDEMNIFIES L SAVES HARMLESS THIS ENGINEER FOR ALL COSTS I DAMAGES INCLUDING LEGAL FEES 1 APPELLATE FEES RESULTING FROM MATERIAL FABRICATION,SYSTEM ERECTION&CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES BEYOND THAT WHICH IS CALLED FOR BY LOCAL,STATE, L FEDERAL CODES I FORM DEVIATIONS OF THIS PLAN,EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED TN HEREIN,NO CERTIFICATION OR AFFIRMATIONS ARE INTENDED. Oscar M. Bermudez, PE. DATE! Reg. Florida No, 55141 HURRICANE BOAT LIFTS 3301 S.E. Slater Street B&B Engineers, ` Stuart, Florida 34997 706 S. 7th STREET '' j (772)-781-2556 FT. PIERCE, FLORIDA 34950 a.; `f •-,, `:. , ' Fax (772)-781-4854 ---- AM..* -`A..*MIA :msrATo.a RUST 10 MAIM AT MR TSE .,..._. - 8A 10 tit ro .1- a ft -o al F-- al 6 I o C •.Nr a. f Z r 5 H o tri o 0 3 'al t o d Lrip '1'11 l'.1-0,,, 4 ami RS Q C7 CNS+ C M :ya + '� O cv Lf1 Q_ v d Q © o N til Q V fir. = ----c-') Q , _ (, V ai `Cr (4 ;f O (1111) H IMII 0 •- ' x ° 'L o c ryu IZr1 N , 4 tIJN Q Lt u u + O Ir.. I - ri to n v n I d C6 Q 1' ~ A I- ® .'..i \I I Emil L N O I n ti j 01 C a- I � 3zoo 01 ` .,-J�' JJJCI - a/o� ,� ;; O U) i \ ,..... oU �ia a� r �'a s A /MV�J N i ( 1YlHJJZN O 0 U 8 A N R 3a 1 1 3 -,,:.A c..„ ta rat 1 i 1 0 r I I N LI it i 4.0 / Q 00 I in I 1 I i s6, v; o 1 i �E-� .�' N i� 7 j CC N RI M ZMZM f t6 cu 45 y M r I "1:: Cd z Q I t N ?OO e I Ri�� EN i • a`Nm° i I W i1 j z 0 r 00 " co l44--"-'----_,,io i 1----i- 14 i in OI a) oz � a0N g ( o m v UJ a Jcn • T I. r 8 A i L� ....._ , a)a ti • v in rt r4 O u 4T J ;4z 27.3 S J u = CC J h N O in .N-1 _(' it ¢ P O LI- 2 0 .i1)-) N v D 1 • E 7A - C1- • Uo 0) ❑ u mati 1Jv N F-- v J '---..0 00 _ • ul i. 0 N. in 1md .\i 1 +-1 Ni M `7' 111 tp 1. 601 O 1 o 0 Na ( M o 0 v) r / ;]• I o 9 O N .-a T O C� O *tt 00 n I * o o — M •Or11 r ro 1 c�E-+ —4 N N- _c C 1:2° 1""( 1 CL N >... M 3 Z M Z M J0 m 00 - c u l o cip i u N o v U] i ti v N 'a. = x w Tv sr tii i Id X m g eta "L3 c � 0 � z Q o b I b E m E a v S' JLn NN I O it °o o�m m Z • U0 171 _c zI limy My V E • r r id. co o£ Lr) as I NGK M 11, t i .-a OX O �in' a • Ne: v ', C) N O T, o U LL Y L ....mi. •-- NiO L J m 01 OLv N O ( (I) (1) • til c e7 D -Z, WZN n000 r aov m C'� U .• • s criL wa BA 0= 14' MIN. i x a -vo / 4"MIrv. (CI) v z / z '-";i". /4/ 'Z' tii - -- v A , ,I 0 M� fCZ [ /} ti } . ti n r/ I N - a r� z . ' • . n • Y , Z (,..2 P if ) ) , va xx� d ,, �CO n ti]'t7 ro ,! t7- p 0 < A CO tz h-` 0' 0gOrzLs. / V +' �y® �1 �U MI 0 Jr) a = v=s t 0 tx' : 0 m tii cax 4ky C > n �d�n� ,� ._, w o �„ r a x 0 Dix n z t r� yiv_x� H Di;1 R ray �7 p b �ni�rd^xC �' xf) �4 m 0 t°y CO C, tri a z z tti n th o x tv tri � • CD cw-3 � 0ro x a r °''i a r t I� r O or 0 0 z O q L. \\•6,q' s9tl€',(,, P WCC] "0 EC\ ..%0,440,4, // e.., Ut of .� 16D g, z En 0 m n figto,; ® � tii %\\ K t a 0 sap" CIS VCI 2 / •...............�`d 0 to N I�* � * `\\�\� o AL0 r M 111110 , �, r '0 1 it PNEN C) 0 m o Z c't 0 e";/ G1 mCli ale m v 0 H 0 w o x z1-3 \\ M z min tii , Ky K ' �' 71 Z }� C X z k Gl �+ 0 to P> — 17,tTJ 0 RI In v fil * n '0 N ° x ,-,<- • =4,k Py X r ■ 44- n 03 - p 0 3 an 11:1 'I T z v UI2 d til p a v z ICJ - $ _ t x� Tim F---4 ui AA03 kprCD D g /1 (TYP.) X O \. A041 - tel : mOu iwm 4 24„ 1 (TYP) nvilifiN'1 O m >e„ CP ;P C.a iv ,- rb a ' otn ' r-11 z C r En dCD air 0 Xi w U1 M to kz y z2 � C XI ►�` �-3 ten. MI o '.-] 2 m -0 td ' i/ rn x � 0 v;u� code Z U1 r ,► �, � y � z � O if i n to o � 0 rti o -n N r.. Cil to Z O Z ►� 4 in n U1 W m13 cm—mc - - rt- toip Z v p Cn C m mo n �Oi nZ x c a o 7r3 in IV arr•. -c EXHIBIT Jenks Builders.Inc, • 8A Estimate 7600 Alio()Rd.#12 PMB#2 Date Estimate Fort Myers,FL 33912 2/28x2017 041900 Name?Address £ Nancy Koeper&Roxanne Jeske 342 Tradewinds Ave. Naples,FL 34108 Rep Project Description Total 1 Estimated cost to remove pool shell.lower!Atwell.redig and shoot new pool shell. Saw cut remove and dispose of 2'6 x 89'of d"thick retaining wall. 10.000.00 Saw cut,chip and remove pool shell and pile taps. 25.000f10 Cut pilings to accommodate new pool shell. 1,500.00 Dig,form and shoot new pool shell. 30,000.00 Properly dispose of'all debris. Total 566,500.00 7nl'Bn92706 aN BOUNDARY SURVEY OF LOT 11, BLOCK"M", UNIT No. 2, CONNER'S VANDERBILT BEACH ESTATES,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 17, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD. Fv.BM I & 1'19 "PSM 3667" 1215' (R ) 1215. !2' (M ) 0 0.11'W.,NAV D ELEV. + 02.88 - m pi).NAIL IN PVMT.GUT•14oLE ( TRADE WINDS AVE . ( r-- 760' U ) 760.07'(C) -----N ; 1y °___ _ .0 �y�---._ " v —-- I 75.01 ' i FD.PK NAIL IN PVMT. ' 3 0.0' > 1 i CUT-140LE, 0.06'W ''PD NAIL SHAFT �. -,► FD6E OF PVMT. IN PVMT.GUT- (Y O cONG. GONG. C.; NOLE Q 4 O C M 1 I2" R.G. ,o WV rn 588°04' 10"W 75.00'MR) 75.0I'(G) ' � S' . H ) • 41 FiR*5"PSM.... O WM FIR#5 0.52'S.,0.29'E. • P5M 5762" Q i) 0.03'N�O.01'W. 4"PV, 5TU8 Out m N f-n , r-- Irk m m W C Z ^I 765'4 : > z4 24.0' m m 14.0.' 768 0Z--) > N a 8.05' ".65'� N ES �;tr? w — N in 9.0' c 13542 TRADE WIMPS AVE" BLOCK OA _ C.B.S. NOUSE (under con5E." w FIN. LOO ELEV. 4-10.4 r o m u, c0 Lu U` 20.6' "' o .. ; z.05' Ln in S, ba ao o `r I` 15.0' it Nti 4.35'6' its 0.8' .65' m tri 1 .. i) t i , 0 i O SET DRILLJ•IOLE ' IN TOP OF CONC. 4 dWALL 1, C. S.RETAINING WALL 59,71 ALUM.1F FENCE NAVD ELEV. +-03.31 614 7.6 —fit r- 11 . a• te '(—I.14', — .3S'WIDE CONC. %EAWALL CAP L 114 -I 1 S88°04'10"W 75.00'(R) 75.01'(M) • 0 5ET DRILL-10LE 1N TOP OF CONC. SEAWALL NAVD ELV. + 03.32 W ATER W AY SCALE: 1"=20' 9- 5 -15 0815 025 . 0010-52 VACANT/NAvl7 Et-EV PRM. : xtRMuANANENr �LCPEOINT BEARINGS BASED ON:4 TRAVWW WIMPS AVE,AS 688°04'10"4118 PER RECORD PL4 DATE ORDER FIELD BOOK REVISIONS MONUMENT ELEVATIONS BASED ON:NAVD 1988 (oRIG.OM t L DNR. cot.29 1084 BSM SIR - SET s IRON ROD' LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE: AE (IC') 5-19- 16 0516015 C010- 52 FOUNDATION/ELL-/GERT W/C oMNi SURVEYS' PER F.I.R.M. DATED: 5.16.2812 12021C 0189 1-1 SIR�4 = SET 4 IRON ROD _W/CA'oMNI SURVEYS' CERTIFICATE C.M. = CONCRETE MONUMENT I hereby FIR FOUND IRON ROD Y certify that the above sketch correctly Ndc( ) - NAIL do (T=TIN,D—DISK) represents a land survey made by me or under my VALID FD. - FOUND direct supervision and meets the minimum technical R = RECORD standards as set forth by the Florida Board of ONLY = MEASURED Professional Land Surveyors in Ch 5J 17,050 5J-17.052 FL WITH INC. CD, — DC CALCULATED Administrative Code, Pursuant to Section 472.027, Florida OMNI S U R VEYS N EED = DRAINAGE EASEMENT Statutes. I further certify that it is only for the lands EMBOSSED PUE = PUBLIC IJTIIJTY EASEMENT heroin described and is valid only with the raised SEAL lc p C) WM = WATER METER embossed surveyor's seal of the undersigned, It is not a WV = WATER VALVE certification of Title, Zoning or freedom of encumbrances. FH = FIRE HYDRANT /J LB 6584 MH = MANHOLE (SS=SAN,STS=STORM) /// RCP - RENFORCED CONCRETE PIPE l 11/ 1 EXHIBIT 2/28/2017 Collier County,FL Land Development Code 4.02.03 - Specific Standards for Location of Accessory Buildings and Structures 2 f A. For the purposes of this section, in order to determine yard requirements, the term "accessory structure" shall include detached and attached accessory use structures or buildings notwithstanding the attachment of such structure or building containing the accessory use to the principal use structure or building. Accessory buildings and structures must be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure and shall conform with the following setbacks and building separations. Table 3. Dimensional Standards for Accessory Buildings and Structures on Non-Waterfront Lots And Non-Golf Course Lots in Zoning Districts other than Rural Agricultural (A) and Estates (E)**. 1 I Front I Rear Side Structure , to Structure (If Detached) 1 . Parking garage or carport, single-family SPS 10 feet SPS 10 feet 2. One-story parking structures and/or SPS 35 feet SPS 10 feet i carports 3. Multistory parking structures SPS 35 feet SPS 1/1* 4. Swimming pool and/or screen enclosure SPS 10 feet SPS N (one- and two-family) 5. Swimming pool (multi-family and SPS 20 feet 15 feet N commercial) 6. Tennis courts (private) (one- and two- SPS 15 feet SPS 10 feet family) 7. ` Tennis courts (multi-family, and SPS 20 feet 15 feet 20 feet commercial) 8. Utility buildings SPS 10 feet SPS 10 feet https://www.m uni code.com/I i brary/fl/col I ier_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeld=C H4SID ED EST 1/5 2/28)2017 Collier County,FL Land Development Code 8 A 9. Chickee, barbecue areas SPS 10 feet SPS 10 feet 10. Attached screen porch SPS 10 feet SPS N/A 11. Unlisted accessory SPS SPS SPS 10 feet 12. Satellite dish antenna NP 15 feet SPS 10 feet 13. Permanent emergency generators NP 10 feet See Sec. N/A 4.02.01 D.13 N = None. N/A = Not applicable. NP = Structure allowed in rear of building only. SPS = Calculated same as principal structure. * = 1 foot of accessory height = 1 foot building separation. ** = All accessory structures in Rural Agricultural and Estates zoning districts must meet principal structure setbacks. Table 4. Dimensional Standards for Accessory Buildings and Structures on Waterfront Lots and Golf Course Lots in Zoning Districts other than Rural Agricultural (A) and Estates (E)** 2 Setbacks Front Rear Side Structure to structure (If Detached) https://www.m unicode.com/li brary/fl/col I ier_county/codes/I and_developm ent_code?nodeld=C H4SI D ED EST 225 8 2/28/2017 Collier County,FL Land Development Code !ids 1. Parking garage or carport, single- SPS SPS SPS 10 feet family 2. One-story parking structures SPS SPS SPS 10 feet 3. Multistory parking structures SPS SPS SPS 1/11 4. Swimming pool and/or screen SPS 10 feet3 SPS N enclosure (one- and two-family) 5. Swimming pool (multi-family and SPS 20 feet 15 feet N commercial) 6. Tennis courts (private) (one- and SPS 15 feet SPS 10 feet two-family) 7. Tennis courts (multi-family and SPS 35 feet SPS 20 feet commercial) 8. Boathouses and boat shelters SPS N/A 7.5 feet or 10 feet (private) 15 feet See subsection 5.03.06F. 9. , Utility buildings SPS SPS 10 feet 10 feet 10. Chickee, barbecue areas SPS 10 feet SPS N 11 . Davits, hoists and lifts N/A N/A 7.5 feet or SPS 15 feet 12. Attached screen porch SPS 10 feet4 SPS SPS 13. Unlisted accessory SPS SPS SPS 10 feet https://www.m unicode.com/I i brary/fl/col I ier_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeld=C H4SID ED EST 3/5 2/28/2017 Collier County,FL Land Development Code 8A 14. Docks, decks and mooring pilings N/A N/A 7.5 feet or N/A 15 feet 15. Boat slips and ramps (private) N/A N/A 7.5 feet N/A 16. Satellite dish antennas NP 15 feet SPS 10 feet 17. Permanent emergency generators NP 10 feet See Sec. N/A 4.02.01 D.13 18. Golf clubhouse and maintenance 50 feet 50 feet 50 feet N/A buildings5 { N = None. N/A= Not applicable. NP = Structure allowed in rear of building only. SPS = Calculated same as principal structure. ** = All accessory structures in Rural Agricultural and Estates zoning districts must meet principal structure setbacks. 11 foot of accessory height = 1 foot of building separation. 21n those cases where the coastal construction control line is involved, the coastal construction control line will apply. 320 feet where swimming pool decks exceed 4 feet in height above top of seawall or top of bank, except Marco Island and Isles of Capri which may construct to a maximum of seven feet above the seawall with a maximum of four feet of stem wall exposure, with the rear setback of ten feet. 420 feet where floor or deck of porch exceeds 4 feet in height above top of seawall or top of bank, except Marco Island and Isles of Capri which may construct to a maximum of seven feet above the seawall with a maximum of four feet of stem wall exposure, with the rear setback of ten feet. 5 The setback shall apply to external boundaries of the golf course district, and shall be inclusive of separately platted buffer tracts. https://www.municode.com/library/fl/collier_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeld=CH4SIDEDEST 4/5 2/28/2017 Collier County,FL Land Development Code 8A B. Accessory buildings shall not occupy an area greater than five (5) percent of the total lot area in all residential zoning districts, or occupy an area greater than forty(40) percent of any building envelope (i.e., area of lot remaining for building purposes after accounting for required setbacks), whichever is the lesser, provided the total maximum coverage provision of this ordinance for all principal and accessory buildings is not exceeded. Nothing herein contained shall serve to prevent the construction of an accessory building containing an area of less than 500 square feet provided all yard and building spacing requirements can be met. (Ord. No. 06-07, § 3.F; Ord. No. 07-67, § 3.J; Ord. No. 08-63, § 3.J; Ord. No. 14-33, § 3.J; Ord. No. 15-45, § 2.B) https://www.m unicode.com/I i brary/fl/col I ier_county/codes/l and_developm ent_code?nodeld=C H4SID ED EST 5/5 EXHIBIT January 19,2017 8 A I ik economic hardship involved in putting it into compliance would be,at minimum,$50,000. So for those reasons and also the fact that I think if you read the planning board's recommendation, they set things forth very thoroughly on why they would--not the planning board but the--I guess the report from-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's called a staff report. MR. SHAPIRO: --yeah, staff report. They set forth very particularly why they're recommending that the variance be approved. So I would ask that,you know,you all take a look at that,and they lay it out very nicely. And they were also aware of the neighbors that were objecting also when they came to that recommendation. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are you finished,Mr. Shapiro? y .,_ MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah,I am finished. My understanding is there's :fnai eighbors that are right across the way that were also going to testify for the petitioner. ;" ; •CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let me tell you what the procedure '=s, a 4.41;p don't think you've been here before. After you finish your presentation,the Planning Co •�; .i 0=ai,�q uestions if they have any. Then from there we'll go to the staff report. After the sta f and sta.`" " erbal recommendations over parts of their report,we ask questions; . When they $.••we go to public • speakers. , ' MRSHAPIRO: Okay. ,4„ =' CHAIRMAN STRAIN: After public speakers,' ;y ave aF nity for a 11 '` to rebuttal, and then we go into discussion and decision on our part,o' ' a+ x � on our part. So at will be the process we'll go through. And since you're fmished,and befo }. `:Planning Commission questions, there are a few things I think Pd like you to s' >9; .;and clear up Tanning Commission gets the benefit of those answers before any questions area;,p MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. 9 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You said the' was 4 y.'' '% ` .t"it w, en they built this 2.5, two-and-a-half years ago. Wh.,"a'1you mean MR. SHAPIRO: '#'` t"Main,I do ` �` -- CHAIRMAN � ��e ��-' - #,�a limit was but'� ., fir.%//: . � � ST"..° ,t "I`' ';<xit--wha, mean by"time limit"? MR. SHAP I' 1f% s en I sayA'. d-a-hal A s,I don't know if that's the exact time. CHAIRMAN 9 Gy :,t • Pro vi rg in terms o to a decade or two. This height issue has been rid , in the code very,very e. ' ,.� ,, °; x • ery in our code to find it,and it only seems to be applicable to .., .a •ilt B zn :" y s Isle of Capri and Marco Island don't have to have this kind ..10- 'S , Th'%o, ?,,seven feet, .yours then would have been fine if you were on ,.� ,.5,. Isles o �.�� ,.� '4,= :.. A �? �- e SHAPIRO% • �' iss :°�z-�.�$Put the two-and-a-half feet. I just was kind of making that up as '0,74p � ane 3 �.n ' finF • STRA I % W ell,you an't make things up. We've got to deal with the code in fact. And if your-„* to reference;X14,ething of the code and it also involves the staff error,we've definitely got to weigh in on £ _�;� under t. ,3. : %may,, , You had f .. „,, ' acks were erroneously given to your client. Have you got something that says for your client t.�/�P;. ;44zE ose setbacks? MR. SHAPIRI eeheve there is. The builder is here,and he could probably better answer that than I could. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,that will be helpful.If he's here,then we'll-- see,you ought to call him as someone--a witness on your behalf to begin with before we go to the staff report. So if he's here, we're definitely going to--we'll ask questions of him after the Planning Commission gets finished with you. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Those couple things,though,are important as to how this happened,the time frame. The code has not changed. The code is just obscure and hard to read in this particular issue,I'll grant you that. It certainly isn't clear. And as far as the staff goes,yes,a staff member certainly made an error in approving this the way it Page 6 of 46 8 A BCC Meeting : February 28 , 2017 Agenda Item #8A - Petition : VA-PL2O16OOO1181 Located at: 324 Trade Winds Ave. Presentation by: Mark Shapiro Picture Exhibits: #5, lz, 8, 10, 11 , 13 , 7, 4, 9, 6, 16, 1 , & 2 These exhibits are too large to scan and can be found at the Clerk to the Board's Office — BMR, 4th Floor, Building F