Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CCPC Agenda 02/16/2017
AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., FEBRUARY 16, 2017, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, THIRD FLOOR, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—January 19,2017 6. BCC REPORT-RECAPS 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. PL20150002167/CP-2015-1: A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89- 05, as amended, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element to revise the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed Use District to add the previously requested 150,000 square feet of commercial land uses for the 14.492 acre tract per Petition No. CP-2003-1; to add 50,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area to the existing 200,000 square feet of commercial land uses and the previously requested 150,000 sf of commercial land uses for a total of 400,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area of commercial land uses; to remove a development restriction related to transportation impacts; and furthermore recommending transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject Subdistrict is 47.94± acres and located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and approximately 1/4 mile west of Collier Boulevard in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt,AICP,Principal Planner] 10. NEW BUSINESS 11. OLD BUSINESS 12. PUBLIC COMMENT 13. ADJORN CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows/jmp January 19, 2017 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples,Florida,January 19,2017 LET IT BE REMEMBERED,that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building"F"of the Government Complex, East Naples,Florida,with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Mark Strain Stan Chrzanowski Diane Ebert Karen Homiak Joe Schmitt Patrick Dearborn ALSO PRESENT: Mike Bosi,Planning and Zoning Manager Fred Reischl,Principal Planner Jeffrey A.Klatzkow,County Attorney Heidi Ashton-Cicko,Managing Assistant County Attorney Tom Eastman, School District Representative Page 1 of 46 January 19, 2017 PROCEEDINGS MR.BOSI: Chair? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good morning,everyone.Welcome to the Thursday,January 19th meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. If everybody will please rise for Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Roll call by our secretary,please. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Yes. Good morning. Mr.Eastman? MR.EASTMAN: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Mr.Chrzanowski? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Ms. Ebert is here. Mr. Strain? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Ms.Homiak? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Mr. Schmitt? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Present. COMMISSIONER EBERT: And,Mr.Dearborn? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Here. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. And we have two advertised public hearings today. The first one is going to be a variance on a property at 342 Tradewinds Avenue,and the second one is a review of our Collier County Land Development Code amendments. It will be the second or third reading on some of these for the Planning Commission. It will not be the final. There will be another review. We'll have maybe our final on the 30th in the evening. And with that,we'll move into the Planning Commission absences. We have two upcoming meetings: 5:05 January 30th is the LDC review that I just mentioned. Does anybody know if they're not going to make it on January 30th in the evening in this room? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And the next regular meeting is February 2nd. Same time,same place,the same place as today. Everybody? Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That one,Mark,I may miss that one,but I'm not sure. What's the agenda look like for that one? MR.BOSI: I believe there's only one item on for the 2nd. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'll let you guys know,and then you can let the rest of the commissioners know if, in fact,I'm going to be missing from that one. It could go up go in the air. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But I'll know by that night. I'll be here for that Monday meeting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well,we'll still have a quorum, so we're good. Thank you. That takes us to approval of minutes. There have been none electronically provided, so we'll skip that. We'll go to the BCC report and recaps. And Ray's not here,but,Mike,you can go ahead. MR.BOSI: Thank you,Chair. Mike Bosi,Planning and Zoning Director. At the hearing on the 10th,the Collier County Resource Recovery Business Park IPUD was approved unanimously. The Naples Heritage PUD amendment to add the 5-acre tennis facility was defeated by a 3-2 vote,and further clarification was provided to staff for the specifics of a moratorium that was going--that is being considered for the East Trail related to self-storage facilities,car washes,pawnshops, and-- Page 2 of 46 January 19, 2017 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Gas station. MR.BOSI: --gas stations. Thank you. And so with the further direction,we are bringing back an ordinance on the 14th of February for the Board to consider whether they want to take fmal action upon that moratorium. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you,Mike. That brings us to the chairman's report,and I have just one thing. Good morning,Nora Frances.I hope you're watching today. She's a friend of the Planning Commission's. Happens to be related to Stan. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Only by marriage. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The consent agenda,we have none,so we'll move directly into our advertised public hearings. ***The first one up is Item 9A. It's VA-PL20160001181,and it's a variance request for a property located at 342 Tradewinds Avenue. All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item,please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. We'll start with disclosures on the Planning Commission from Tom. MR.EASTMAN: None. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Stan? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Strangely,none. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Diane? COMMISSIONER EBERT: I talked with Fred yesterday,and emails and correspondence with a neighbor. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You've had correspondence with a neighbor,or they just sent you an email? COMMISSIONER EBERT: Well,yeah,they just sent me. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. That's all. I just wanted to make sure. We've all got an email or two on this,and so I think mine are probably similar to everybody else's. I did talk with the applicant when this first came to my other office,and she came in and asked for some clarification of the process. We went over that,and I think we've talked once since then. And I also talked to Mr.Patrick--Pat Neale who represents some residents who are not in favor of this application. And then,of course, staff Diane? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Karen. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Karen, I'm sorry. Diane's over here. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Nothing. Just the additional email yesterday. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Joe? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: None. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Pat? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: None. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. With that,we'll move right into the presentation by the applicant to start out. MR. SHAPIRO: I'm Marc Shapiro representing the applicant. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If you have items that you want to use the overhead for--I don't think you've appeared before us before--that stand over there has a lot more electronic availability for things to show. You might want to use that. MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah,there may be some-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And also,our mikes don't pick up unless you're really close to them. And we have a walk-around mike over there if you need to get closer to something else that you're trying to show. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We'll need you to identify yourself and spell your last name for the record, and we'll be good. MR. SHAPIRO: My name is Marc Shapiro. Marc's spelled M-a-r-c; Shapiro, S-h-a-p-i-r-o. Page 3 of 46 January 19, 2017 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MR. SHAPIRO: And I'm representing the petitioners in this case for 342 Tradewinds Avenue. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Everything,by the way,that you show on overhead will have to be--copies of it will have to be left with the court reporter for the record. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. They're mainly going to be photographs. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's great. Thank you. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. So there was a variance petition that was filed by the builder in this case, Jason Jenks,and then there was a deficiency letter that was issued,and then my office prepared an amended variance,and that variance was actually recommended for approval. And so that was recommended for approval by,I guess,the Growth Management Department. But I want to read a couple things actually from their words. And,you know,it's important to point out,there's three basic things is--one is the variance we're asking for is a very small variance. So it's--and there's a new code that was brought in this area. So this particular property,you couldn't even tell that it doesn't comply with the current variance because there are several houses that are exactly in line. In fact,it doesn't look out of place at all,and you wouldn't know. And,in fact,that comes to my first point is that when the permit was applied for,it was applied for using the setbacks that are currently for the pool right now. Those setbacks were approved. There was many inspections that were done to the property. In each case,during each inspection,it was approved. Nobody even caught that it didn't meet the current code until one of the neighbors,I guess,came and pointed out to the county that it didn't comply with the current code,and it was at that time that my client was informed they had to do a petition for a variance. So my client,who hired the builder,had no idea that it didn't comply with code. In fact, if you'd look at it,there's no way you could even tell that it--because it doesn't stick out. It's something that's completely in line with the rest of the structures that are on both sides of the street or on the canal there. So--and it says here--this is from the report that was issued from the Growth Management--the applicant utilized the erroneously approved setbacks unaware of any violations. So when they applied for the pool permit,the county actually provided the setbacks,and they erroneously provided the setbacks that were the older setbacks that hadn't--rather than the updated ones. So based on those setbacks,my client constructed the pool and poured the slab. And we're talking about approximately two and a half feet. Now,the setbacks,they're about six feet over--instead of a 20-foot setback,they were told they had a 10-foot setback, so they're over the setback,but it's important to note that the height of the pool wall,if it was two-and-a-half feet lower,they could be 10 feet, the setbacks. It's 20-feet setbacks based on the current height. So we're talking two-and-a-half feet. So the two-and-a-half feet does not really affect anyone's view. In fact,we have the neighbor right across the street--in fact,I brought some pictures,which I'll show in a moment,but if anything,the view from the neighbor,their lanai actually sticks out further than my client's pool which doesn't have a lanai on it and never will. Also, if you're looking across,there's boats parked,and the boats that are parked,which are legally parked in front of the seawall, stick out higher than my client's pool does. So it's a very,I would say, negligible impact. In fact,when I looked down the canal,I had to ask,you know,which one--to my client, which one is your house,because you can't tell by looking at it that it sticks out. It's perfectly in line with all of the rest of the houses. We're just talking about two-and-a-half feet up. And a few years ago,when the code was that,you know,that--exactly what they built,so we're not talking about any major impact. Now,it would be a severe economic hardship for my client to have to completely tear down the whole--by the time this was brought to their attention--and,again,it was brought to their attention because, I guess,the neighbor pointed it out to the county--they had already poured the slab. They had already put the whole pool in--where the pool was going to be. That was already in. And they estimate--this is from the builder--and I think it's a very conservative estimate--that to go back and redo this--because they'd have to basically tear out the whole poured concrete pool and start over again--would be, in his words, $50,000. And,again,I think that's a very conservative number. But it would be,at minimum, $50,000 to go back and redo this over essentially two-and-a-half feet. Page 4 of 46 January 19, 2017 So I'd like to at this time show some photographs. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Fred will help you with the overhead;that's the gentlemen right there. You'll have to use the mike,either the walk-around mike or the stationary one. MR. SHAPIRO: All right. So if you can see where my finger is,this is the structure in question. And,actually,this view is where--the people that are here opposing this,this would be their view. So there's two views. There's an open-water view,and then there's down the canal. So if you're looking down the canal,you'll see that this structure is really in line with all the other structures and,in fact,one of the people that's objecting to this,his pool enclosure is the same height and the same setback as my client's because,as I said,this is a new,I guess,updated requirement. And when they--when they put in the permit for the pool,they were erroneously giving the older setback requirements. So it's not like this sticks out at all. It just doesn't comply with the latest setback requirements. Here's another--this is a similar view,just a little bit more close up. And this is a view here--you'll see that this structure here is the structure in question. And the neighbors on actually both sides, if you line up the seawalls,they line up perfectly together. In other words,the setbacks on both sided,the neighbors on either side,are both exactly the same setbacks as my client's,the petitioner's setback. And, again,it's because these were the former setbacks. So this is the picture of the--you can see the open-water view. And,again,the petitioner's structure is right here. So you'll see if you're looking down,the people that are objecting to this,the neighbors that are objecting,they are way down towards this range--I'm sorry. They're towards this area here. So they're actually--their view is not obstructed of the open water because the petitioner's structure's down here. And if they look down the canal,I don't see,being on this side of the road,how their view could be remotely affected,and if it was affected,it would be affected by the lanai of the house in front of them,and if it is affected at all,the two-and-a-half feet isn't going to make any difference. In fact,as I said,the boat--the boats that are parked in front of the structure actually stick out above the pool enclosure. So if their views are obstructed at all, it's not because of this.In fact--and I think you have this as part of the application,but there's a couple letters. One letter is from an objector who actually canvassed the neighborhood on both sides of the street and tried to get as many people to object as possible, and I think he was successful in maybe getting one other,possibly two others,to object. My client,I believe,has 43 people. Well, I say 43 because that's how many people live there that either didn't care about it or actually signed a petition in her favor or a letter in her favor saying that they didn't believe that her house--they believe that the variance should be granted;that her house doesn't obstruct any view,doesn't stick out,doesn't make it look like it's not conforming with the community. In this picture here you'll see this house right here is the subject house,but the house right before that,the lanai actually would inhibit the view and actually that tree right there would inhibit the view of the objectors that are looking down the canal before my client's pool enclosure would. In fact,from this view, which is--you can't even see the pool. And then, lastly,this picture shows--and I want to point out the house next to it with the lanai. So the objectors would be looking down this way, so they'd actually be seeing that lanai before they would see this pool. So I guess the three points I want to make is that it was not purposefully done. When the builder applied for the permit,they were erroneously given the wrong setbacks;they built the pool using the wrong setbacks;there was four inspections along the way,never once did anyone point out that,oh,this doesn't comply. In fact, it wasn't till the neighbor pointed that out,and that's the reason we're here today. The second point I want to make is that if there's any impact at all on the neighborhood,which I submit there's not because it's perfectly in line with the other houses'setbacks--in fact,if you were to walk that street,you wouldn't even notice that this house was out of conformity. But if there is any impact,it would be very negligible. We're basically talking about two-and-a-half feet. If the seawall were two-and-a-half feet lower,the setback would be correct. Also,if they moved it back approximately,I believe, six feet,then they could have it that height. So we're talking about two-and-a-half Page 5 of 46 January 19, 2017 feet,and the economic hardship involved in putting it into compliance would be,at minimum, $50,000. So for those reasons and also the fact that I think if you read the planning board's recommendation, they set things forth very thoroughly on why they would--not the planning board but the--I guess the report from-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's called a staff report. MR. SHAPIRO: --yeah, staff report. They set forth very particularly why they're recommending that the variance be approved. So I would ask that,you know,you all take a look at that,and they lay it out very nicely. And they were also aware of the neighbors that were objecting also when they came to that recommendation. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are you finished,Mr. Shapiro? MR. SHAPIRO: Yeah,I am finished. My understanding is there's some neighbors that are right across the way that were also going to testify for the petitioner. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let me tell you what the procedure is,because I don't think you've been here before. After you finish your presentation,the Planning Commission will ask questions if they have any. Then from there we'll go to the staff report. After the staff report and staff make verbal recommendations over parts of their report,we ask questions of them. When they finish,we go to public speakers. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: After public speakers,you'll have an opportunity for a 10-minute rebuttal, and then we go into discussion and decision on our part,or recommendation on our part. So that will be the process we'll go through. And since you're finished,and before we go to Planning Commission questions, there are a few things I think I'd like you to answer and clear up so the Planning Commission gets the benefit of those answers before any questions are asked. MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You said the code was exactly what it was when they built this 2.5, two-and-a-half years ago. What did you mean by that? MR. SHAPIRO: Well--and,again,I don't know when the time limit was,but-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Time limit--what do you mean by"time limit"? MR. SHAPIRO: When I say two-and-a-half years,I don't know if that's the exact time. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Probably in terms of closer to a decade or two. This height issue has been in the code very,very early on. The problem is it's very obscure in our code to find it, and it only seems to be applicable to Vanderbilt Beach. Specifically our code says Isle of Capri and Marco Island don't have to have this kind of an application. They go to seven feet,which yours then would have been fine if you were on Isles of Capri or Marco Island. Also-- MR. SHAPIRO: So I misspoke about the two-and-a-half feet. I just was kind of making that up as an example. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,you can't make things up. We've got to deal with the code in fact. And if you're going to reference something of the code and it also involves the staff error,we've definitely got to weigh in on that and understand it. You had said that the setbacks were erroneously given to your client. Have you got something that says for your client to design to those setbacks? MR. SHAPIRO: I believe there is. The builder is here,and he could probably better answer that than I could. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,that will be helpful. If he's here,then we'll--see,you ought to call him as someone--a witness on your behalf to begin with before we go to the staff report. So if he's here, we're definitely going to--we'll ask questions of him after the Planning Commission gets finished with you. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Those couple things,though,are important as to how this happened,the time frame. The code has not changed. The code is just obscure and hard to read in this particular issue,I'll grant you that. It certainly isn't clear. And as far as the staff goes,yes,a staff member certainly made an error in approving this the way it Page 6 of 46 January 19, 2017 came through. But I don't know if that was a result of the staff telling you to do it that way or your design professionals decided to do it that way,and that will be something we'll find out shortly. With those clarifications,and before I get into any more of my questions,I'll turn to the Planning Commission for any questions they may have to start with. Anybody? Stan? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Just,those shots you took,those were taken with a drone,I assume? MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I'm glad you did that. It showed it very well. I looked at Google Earth 3D. And from what I could tell on Google Earth 3D, I couldn't see where there was a tremendous difference from this to the other,the older to the new,but those shots showed it pretty good. I was going to ask--you probably don't know.I guess a lot of my other questions are going to be to staff. MR. SHAPIRO: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else? Joe? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I have several questions regarding the process,but I'm going to defer and wait to talk to Mr.Reischl,because I need to--but the question I do have for you,Marc,did you--or do you have in your documents--typically when you go in for a building permit,the first thing they do is lay out the site plan,and then on that site plan,the reviewer in the Building Department, is my recollection,would initial off each of the setback requirements and put their initials on--actually right on the document. Do you--is that the procedure now? And I'm going back six,seven years back in--but typically they would--you'd go in,on the building--the building envelope that is allowable for a building would be shown on the site drawing of the--and then all of the setbacks would be checked off to ensure that the setbacks are in compliance. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The permits for this project are on my desk. I pulled them yesterday afternoon.That document is there. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Is there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: There's been four permits: One demo,one pool,the main permit for the house,and the dock permit that was reissued,because it was started,then stopped,and then reissued again. And there's some discrepancies between the permits,but the setbacks and everything were acknowledged by staff as being okay and issued that way. And I've actually got the building permit with me. I didn't know how much the applicant would have brought in case there were questions,but the permit itself was issued at 10 feet. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You don't have that document that shows the setbacks being approved? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's in the file that's on my desk. I did not bring it with me to the meeting. I assumed the applicant would have brought all of that,but-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm surprised that that's not part of the application or the applicant would have had that to present to us today. My second question--and I'm going to defer to Fred because I want to clearly understand the--again,I've got the MUNI code here. I'm trying to read the MUNI code,because I looked at this before. But in this part I recall nine, 10 years ago,that's what drove the change in the code, if you went up a certain height,and I seem to think it was four feet; is that correct? MR. SHAPIRO: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You go four feet,you have to have a 20-foot setback. If your pool height is less than 4 feet,you only need a 10-foot setback; is that essentially the-- MR. SHAPIRO: That's exactly correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,we can--I'll give Fred the code. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah,let's review that,because I want to make sure that--and I had thought at one time that actually in the LDC there was a diagram that showed that. I guess that's no longer in Page 7 of 46 January 19,2017 the LDC. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No,but a former administrator by the name of Joe Schmitt actually did a diagram a few years back,and it's in the staff clarification section of our notes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I did,yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Fred,if you go here--go to the reference in the table first,and that's--once we get this seen,maybe it will help some of the questions that you-all have. MR. SHAPIRO: But,Mr. Schmitt,my understanding is exactly as you described. And I think their--rather than four feet,they're 6.57. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Fred,that--I'm not sure that's the right one. Those were non-waterfront. Go to the next table. MR.REISCHL: Oh. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You're going to have to pan out a little bit on that,Fred. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,I'll show you--the footnotes are on a separate page. Go to the next table. It's the second or third sheet. And if you look down where it says No.4--you have to pan out a little bit--this is for waterfront lots along the Gulf of--and No.4 says,swimming pools and screen enclosure single-family,one-family,and now two-family;rear, 10 feet,and then the little Footnote 3. Now,Footnote 3 is the catchall on this. If you could show Footnote 3,Fred;down the third page,I think. MR.REISCHL: Very small. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah, it says 20 feet where swimming pool decks exceed four feet in height above the top of seawall or top of bank except Marco Island and Isle of Capri,which may construct to a maximum of seven feet above the seawall with a maximum of four feet of stem wall exposure with a rear setback of 10 feet. So--and Marco,by the way, is no longer part of Collier County. So I pulled Marco's LDC,and they have mimicked this language in their current standards. So the seven foot applies to Marco and Isles of Capri,but only four foot of concrete exposure,which means it's got to be clad or a buffer with vegetation or sodded. MR. REISCHL: Sodded. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any way you'd like. But if they're at less than 20 feet,they can't go higher. It's got to be four feet so that a variance is not for the setback as much as it is for the height to be at that setback. I hope that helped clarify because this was not an easy one to follow for that language. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: What--and so the current height as shown,is that correct what we have-- MR. SHAPIRO: I think the county measured at 6.57. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. That's the current height,then. Okay. I thought it was four-point something. Okay. 6.57. All right. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All right. Anybody else have any questions of the applicant? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Marc,you stated that there were four inspections. Those inspections were not specifically looking for setbacks. There are several inspections throughout the building process. MR. SHAPIRO: Correct. And we're not specifically looking for setbacks,that is correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And I want to make sure that's clear on the record,because if an inspector goes out and does an electrical,he or she's doing electrical inspections,not a setback-- MR. SHAPIRO: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: --verification. MR. SHAPIRO: And I'm talking about--and the builder could better explain this,because I'm getting my information from the builder and relaying it to you. But I think there are four inspections on the pool. So at no time was it ever said during any of those inspections that,hey,your setbacks aren't correct. I guess the point is is that now that it's already there,it would be a very--economic hardship to take it all down. It would come at a considerable cost is,I guess,what I'm trying to say. Page 8 of 46 January 19,2017 And,you know,maybe--and this is up to you. But you were saying that the Marco Island code said you could have a certain height as long as there was a buffer there,and maybe that's a compromise,to put a little hedge in front of the stem wall. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Generally what happens is when we run into these situations,the applicant will come prepared with the documentation to basically make their case in regards to how this occurred. And I know you don't--you haven't got any permit applications or anything with you,do you? MR. SHAPIRO: I don't have the permit applications with me,no. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I have reviewed them,and I didn't bring them because they're our county's copies,but I didn't know you wouldn't be bringing them as well;otherwise,I would have brought them to help clarify some of the things you've asked,Joe. Some of the things you've said I wanted to get some clarification on. You said there were 43 people who didn't call or sign--or necessarily sign in favor. Did someone--and that was an assumption they weren't objecting to it then? MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Did you physically or did your client,or do you have something documented that says you actually went to these 43 homes and spoke to those people? Do you have a survey or something where you-- MR. SHAPIRO: No. What I do have--and I thought you already had that,but I have a--I actually have a copy of a letter that was signed by--and then there's signatures,and then next to it is the residence that they live at. MR.REISCHL: That's included in your packet. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. How many people are on that signature page? MR. SHAPIRO: Eight. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. His number was 43,and I'm trying to understand-- MR. SHAPIRO: The 43 -- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: --how valid that is. MR. SHAPIRO: --because I think that's the number of residents on both sides of the street.And what I was told by my client is that the objector that's here today pretty much knocked on everybody's door. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. You have a couple times mentioned the view down the canal,and at the end of the canal wasn't obstructed any more by what your client has built versus what may already exist there. The view corridors that we consider for these kind of things usually are in line with riparian lines. And that may be an avenue that you may want to look at in reference to view in the future. But down the canal and out the end isn't really something that's considered as directly behind their home. They have riparian rights on both sides of their house,property lines,and that's generally what we take a look at in these kind of matters. MR. SHAPIRO: If I could show you an answer(sic)that might help answer that question. So these little yellow tabs,and I'm not how sure-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh,we can see them. MR. SHAPIRO: You can see them. But those are the people that I believe that are objecting to the variance. And that was taken by Google Earth,so at the time the structure was not up so,unfortunately,I don't have a picture with the structure up,but this vacant lot right here is where the structure was built. So heading this way,that is the open water view heading-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: You have a vacant lot? It's not the one with the trees. It's the one two off--yeah,right under the W of Tradewinds. MR. SHAPIRO: Oh,yes,you're correct. That's--yeah. So that's the house in question,and then this is the location of the people that are objecting. So I guess what I'm saying is,it's hard to see how their view would be affected. And if it is affected, it would be very minorly. I mean,we're talking about 2.57 feet. And,actually,when you--if you look straight across the canal,the boat sticks up higher than the elevation of the pool. So you actually can't even see the pool wall because of the boat that's in front of it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. A couple other issues. You mentioned,or I thought you stated,that Page 9 of 46 January 19,2017 if this pool was moved back six feet,you could have had it at the height they're at. That's not true. To stay at that height you'd have to be 20 feet back, and you're only 10.15 feet back.Then if you take into consideration your stairwell,you're only 6.5 feet back. So you'd have to be considerably further back. The issue of being forward or backward is not as much of an issue as the height of the deck of the pool. That's the six feet that we're trying to--six-and-a-half feet or so we're trying to deal with. The property is perfectly in line with others. When you made that statement,do you know if the others are above four feet since they're in line with an alignment that could only be allowed if they were at or below four feet? MR. SHAPIRO: Some are and some aren't. Some are below four feet. There are some that are above that--again,probably more than 10 years old when the--before the code changed. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,the code is actually older than that. But if there are some above that height and they're in that alignment,it would have certainly been helpful to possibly have looked up those building permits and see what height they're at and maybe would help your argument. But I didn't know if you had that information. I'm double-checking to make sure I don't have any other questions. Oh,I noticed in your photos you didn't show the existing construction with the stairwell. The stairwell is part of the setback alignment. Did you have one with the stairwell? MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. I'll show you a couple. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: There you go. MR. SHAPIRO: That would be the stairwell right there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So the variance request for the setback is because the stairwell exceeds the allowed protrusion if it was at four feet for the pool deck,for example,to go into a setback. Stairwells do have some allowance to--when you go into a setback,but I believe it's only three feet,and this one's three-and-a-half feet? MR.REISCHL: Three feet is the allowable protrusion,and this one is three-and-a-half. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So if this one had six inches less of the protrusion of the stairwell and the setback was allowed at 10 feet,the stair wouldn't be an issue. So I wanted to point that out because it is part of the discussion today,and I noticed the closeup photograph you had didn't show the angle from the stairwell. And,by the way,I don't know if staff caught this,that stair is facing a different direction than the stair that was approved on the building permit. And if the builder's here,maybe he can answer that question, too. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Can you back that out a little bit so I can get a full picture of the-- MR. SHAPIRO: Yes. I actually have another one that has a more full view. If you'd like to look at that,that may be better. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And just for clarification,it was my understanding that the need to build the pool height at the elevation that was built at. Two--one is to meet the base flood elevation for the home,and most residents want to walk out from their residence onto the pool deck rather than walk down the stairs to the pool. Could the pool have been built--could it have been designed and built at a lower height than what it was built at? Which means you would have left the house and walked downstairs to another elevation,a lower elevation for the pool. MR. SHAPIRO: So the answer to your question is,I believe so. Now,the builder could better answer that. So it's not whether it could have,because I believe that it could have. I mean,it could have been built at a 4-foot instead of a 6--instead of a 6.57-foot. But the issue is now it's been done,and to kind of un-ring that bell comes at a significant cost. So I don't think it's a matter of could it have been in compliance. I think that if we were to honestly answer that,yes, it could have been built in compliance,but since it hasn't,it's just what is the cost of bringing it into compliance.And I think that's a pretty heavy cost compared to the impact. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Understand. Fred,can you put that other picture up that shows the overhead? I wanted to--again,that's--can Page 10 of 46 January 19,2017 you center the house actually into the picture. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Zoom out a little. MR.REISCHL: Zoom out. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. There. I want to get a picture of the whole thing. Okay. Yeah. That's exactly what I thought. You're coming out from the house onto basically a lanai deck, and then the pool is at the same height. MR.REISCHL: It's just a few inches. The house is--the base flood elevation was 10,and it's nine-point something. It's a little--a few inches less. So you'd step one step down onto the pool deck. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anything else? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Could you ask your builder, if he's here,if the builder could come up. We do have questions since we understand he's here. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Is that the builder or the person who designed the house as well? MR. SHAPIRO: Both. I think both. MR.JENKS: I didn't design the house. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You'll need to say that on the record after you identify yourself. MR.JENKS: Jason Jenks. I was the contractor who built the house. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And you did not design the house,was your response to that? MR.JENKS: I did not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Was that the question? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah,that was the question. I wanted to-- COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Did you sub out the work for the pool,or were you actually building the pool as well? MR.JENKS: We subbed out the work for the pool. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: The company who's doing the pool? MR.JENKS: Mack Pools. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Mack Pools,okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The information about how this 10-foot,at the height that this deck came about,your--the attorney had indicated that the staff provided you and told you to build it,to design it to that distance;is that true? MR.JENKS: The staff. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: County staff? MR.JENKS: Well,the pool was built by the time we submitted for the variance. So we submitted a set of plans,they were approved,and we started to build. Of course,first thing we built was the pool because of the lot. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Who--when the pool was put down on a set of plans,did you do that,or did you have an architect do that or somebody else? MR.JENKS: A designer did it. I didn't do it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Where did the designer get his information from to determine the setback for that pool? MR.JENKS: I think he made some calls to the county. I don't have that information. I don't work with the designer. He's somebody that designs houses. I was sent the plans. I sent them to an engineer. I have an engineer. I submitted it for a building permit. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. You do--that's what most GCs would do,so I'm not surprised at that.I'm trying to find out--actually,in your--not your defense,but your client's defense,on how this error occurred. It appears--up until your attorney made the statement he made,it appeared that the applicant,which is your designer or your client,drew the plans up and submitted them to the county,the county reviewed them,and the county erroneously approved them without notifying the client that there was an error in the setback. Page 11 of 46 January 19, 2017 I think the error probably was on the plan. I think the error's on both part of the applicant as well as the part of county for not catching it.And the county missed it numerous times. I've got the plans. It wasn't vague. It was clear. It was clear where it was. Your structural drawings show how that stair was also--the width of the stair was clear. I mean,anybody that reads plans would have been able to figure this out. I can't--I certainly can't say the staff is not to blame in part of this. They certainly are. And I think the issue is that whoever set this up in the site plan trying to determine what the initial setbacks were either went to the wrong table or missed the footnote on the second table,kind of as we started out here today. There's two tables,and one is for waterfront,one is for non-waterfront. But one has a little Subscript 3,and the other doesn't. And if you're from another part of the county,you wouldn't be surprised at six-and-a-half feet in height because I bet you could go up to seven. So there's a lot of little things that came into play on this one. It's certainly understandable that some errors were made. I just think we need to find a solution today. In regards to how you were going to finish off this concrete wall now that's there,has anybody looked at opportunities to,say,take away/distract from that wall by cladding it,by putting in shrubbery,by doing embankments or anything like that? MR.JENKS: Those were all options,and it would definitely be some landscaping on the backside of it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So you-all haven't brought anything,though,to propose today? MR.JENKS: We did not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. The height of the seawall. You were the GC;the pool contractor was subbed to you. Orick Marine,I believe,did the deck. Was he contracted through you or directly to the owner? MR.JENKS: Through the owner. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Did you work with him at all in coordinating things? MR.JENKS: I did not;not the seawall. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Do you know--is he here today;does anybody know? MR.JENKS: He's not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. He certified the seawall to be done according to the plans. I see--I found the certification. The plans call for a 4.2 deck height,top height on the seawall cap. The plans that all this variance request is from is a 3.2 height. I just am now--that's a 1-foot difference. It's significant when you look at the difference you have in what you're trying to seek as a solution to your whole operation. And I'm just wondering,does anybody know if that seawall is actually elevated to the 4.2 that the certification seems to insinuate? MR.JENKS: It should show it on the survey that we turned in. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well, it does. It shows 3.2,but I've got a building plan that says it will be capped at 4.2,and I have a certification from the installer that says that's right. So I'm confused by the height of the cap. MR.JENKS: I don't know the answer to that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. The stair. Did you submit a change to the plans to have the stair turned in that direction you've got here? MR.JENKS: We did not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I mean,it's a minor issue. It's still the same distance out,but I just happened to notice it was twisted in a different way. MR.JENKS: It was just easier access to the dock. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,actually,it's better for the neighbors,too. It actually makes people using the stairs going in and out a different direction. So from that perspective, it doesn't harm anything. I was just curious if it got cleared through another permit application. That may have had some indication to the setbacks;may have looked at them again. That's all. COMMISSIONER EBERT: I have a question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead. Page 12 of 46 January 19, 2017 COMMISSIONER EBERT: Have you built in Collier County before? MR.JENKS: This was the first house I ever submitted for for a full construction. We've done lot of remodels and additions in Collier County. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. So you,as a contractor,are familiar with our codes then? MR.JENKS: Yes. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. MR.JENKS: But not the code that has the height on the seawall. This wasn't done intentionally. COMMISSIONER EBERT: No,we all kind of understand that,but-- MR.JENKS: Right. COMMISSIONER EBERT: --one other thing. I'm reading through this, is that a lot of this was found last October. Is there a CO on this property yet? MR.JENKS: There is not. COMMISSIONER EBERT: So the people have not moved into the home? MR.JENKS: They have not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This started with a complaint that started with Contractor Licensing,and I think in April of 2016,then it was followed up with a slab survey in May of 2016. I think that's when everything was kind of unfolded from that point forward. But it wasn't necessarily Code Enforcement initiated,as some of this information shows. It was Contractor Licensing that initiated it,the call. It came into Contractor Licensing from a neighbor across the way,apparently. COMMISSIONER EBERT: So it does go back quite a ways then? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,April of last year;a little bit less than a year ago. They've been trying to work and get it resolved since then. It started with my office,and then it had to get continued to here. MR.JENKS: We've continued to work on the house,but we haven't touched anything on the pool or the pool deck since we were notified of the issue. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. So the pool deck is-- MR.JENKS: It's exactly like it was when we were told it was not in compliance. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else have any questions of the gentleman? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. On that picture shown that you have on the visualizer,the deck that is--and this is a general question that probably the applicant,anybody,can answer. But the deck height that is in the house on the bottom of the picture, is that boat deck higher in elevation than the existing deck that was built? MR.JENKS: The deck we constructed is higher than that deck. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It is? Because this one--that deck to the south appears to go over the seawall,and it's all one structure all the way up to the pool. I'm looking at, is that--was that the intent for this existing-- MR.JENKS: It looks like their dock comes over the-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's it,the dock. MR.JENKS: --ground is what it is,and they just built the dock and went all the way back to that seawall or to their pool retaining wall. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MR. SHAPIRO: Mr. Strain,I just wanted to clarify one thing. When I made the comment that--I guess,that the permitting erroneously gave them the wrong setbacks,so I personally have no idea.I actually read that from the staff report,so that's where I got that information from. That's what they state in their staff report. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Any other witnesses that you want to call,or you done with your Page 13 of 46 January 19, 2017 presentation? MR. SHAPIRO: We are done with the presentation. There--as you said,the only other people would be neighbors,but I believe they go later. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: They'll be coming up later,yes. Okay. Thank you very much,both of you.Appreciate it. Fred,do you have a staff report? MR.REISCHL: Thank you,Mr.Chairman. Fred Reischl with Planning and Zoning. You've read the staff report,and staff is recommending approval with the condition. You know normally that variances run with the land. In this case,we're recommending that if there--if the structure is destroyed more than 50 percent of assessed value,that it would have to meet current setbacks. So we're modifying it so--because this is based on a financial hardship,we figure that financial hardship would go away if the house was destroyed;therefore,they'd have to meet current setbacks. It would not run with the land. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Are there any questions of the staff? I think,Joe,you had one earlier. Did you still? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No. I'll just hold off until we have general discussion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Fred,on the--oh, Stan? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: When we have that general discussion,are we going to be allowed to ask them questions? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. We won't close the public hearing until that's over. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: As far as your understanding of how this originated,do you know if,in fact, staff,at the period in which an applicant may have asked for design features of this location,this lot,was given--was the applicant given information to say he could use a 10-foot setback,or is that just something that seems to be not verified? MR.REISCHL: I don't know the answer to that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. At this point the only thing I can find is it was submitted erroneously,then reviewed erroneously,and then a permit was issued erroneously. That's the best I can-- MR.REISCHL: That was my understanding,too,but I don't know for sure if someone directed them to do it at 10 or not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER EBERT: I have a question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead,Diane. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Fred,you said this is a financial hardship. I would not blame the owners of this home on this at all,but the--being it is--that the pool was stopped so long ago and nothing has been done,I would think that it would be their responsibility and not the owner's responsibility as far as financial; is that correct? MR. REISCHL: That's a legal question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was going to say... COMMISSIONER EBERT: Well,I mean,we always use money,you know,in this stuff. And I was just--like I say,I don't feel that it should be up to the owner. But were these people--were they told you can proceed at your own risk? MR.REISCHL: That's our standard answer is that,yes,you can proceed at your own risk pending the outcome of the--in this case was the Hearing Examiner and now the Board of County Commissioners. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. When were they told that they could proceed at their own risk? How far back? Was this April/May when all this happened? MR.REISCHL: The Building Department would have done that. I don't know. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I want to clarify. I mean,that's-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was going to go there,too. Go ahead,Joe. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I think it's sort of disingenuous to say they're proceeding at their Page 14 of 46 January 19, 2017 own risk. It's a procedural process. When you come in and submit for a permit application,the applicant submits,submits the plans and drawings,they're reviewed by staff,and they're approved by staff. So the applicant proceeds based on the understanding that what they submitted meets in compliance with all the requirements. I don't know if that's the proceed-at-risk issue. It is a review and approval. MR.REISCHL: Well, it would be a risk that the variance would be approved versus-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well,wait a minute.No,I'm going back prior to when the house was first submitted. When the application first goes in,the applicant goes in,the plans are reviewed,the setbacks are reviewed,the setbacks are approved,and the applicant hires a builder,and they build a house based on what the county approved. I don't know if there's a case of sovereign immunity. I guess that's an issue from the county.Could the county be held responsible? I'm not going to go down there,but that's not an issue.The issue here is there's a variance,and--I mean,in general terms,I've got to tell you what,my days in the county,this is more post-traumatic stress than my year in Afghanistan,I've got to tell you. I went through several of these in my tenure as the county--or the administrator for Community Development. And it's a case of applications coming in,the amount of applications coming in and the stress to approve--review and approve,and there was an error made,basically. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: They were given a permit that says 10 feet. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: How much of the house was built when this was found? MR.REISCHL: I was not the original planner on this. One of my coworkers was. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: The contractor would probably know that better than you would. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I was going to ask the contractor to come back up. No,you have to come to the microphone,and maybe we've got a couple more questions for you. Before we do,there was something I wanted to mention in line with what you were saying. The reviewer on this,by the way,was a fellow we had hired recently from Marco Island,and it wouldn't surprise me if,based on his knowledge of Marco Island,Marco Island would have allowed this to go to seven feet, that might have also contributed to the error that happened. Sir,if you could answer-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: How much of the house was built when the problem was found? MR.JENKS: The rear retaining wall was in place,the pool shell was in place,the slab was in place, and I think we had just poured the tie beam,and we may have started framing by then. I don't have the exact-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. Because there was a comment you made earlier that you did the pool first. I could understand that,because you couldn't build a pool with the house in the way-- MR.JENKS: Correct. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: --unless you built it from the waterway,which is practically impossible-- MR.JENKS: Correct. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: --which is one of the problem you're going to have if you have to take it out. You've got to take it out from water side,which is practically impossible. You've got to move the dock,you've got to move the boat. So I could see,even if you told them that,hey,the pool was in the wrong place,you know,they might as well not stop because there's nothing they can do. The house is already in the way. MR.JENKS: That's true. That's true. We didn't do anything to make it any harder to remove this pool or,you know-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Yeah. But once the house is up to the tie beam,you're not going to get back here to do anything with the pool. MR.JENKS: Correct. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Not easily. MR.JENKS: Not easily. Page 15 of 46 January 19,2017 COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Well,you can do anything you want if you've got enough money. Okay. Thanks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I've got a question,a follow-up. MR.JENKS: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You anchored the pool,not with piling,with tie grade beams is what you--that's the only thing holding the pool down? MR.JENKS: Pilings. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh,you've got piling as well. MR.JENKS: And footers,yeah. It's sitting on pilings. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Now,there was a cost put in the report that said it would be about $50,000 to remove that pool and then,of course,it would have to be redone,then all the debris would have to be removed. I know it's not finished,but I would think the 50,000 is certainly a number that's probably realistic in looking at the condition it's in today just to get that concrete taken out and hauled away,if not more. So to answer--Diane seemed to think you stopped construction and, if you did,maybe your value to replace the pool wouldn't be as great. I think the 50,000 is probably conservative in cost-wise to clean this up if it had to be. MR.JENKS: It probably is. And it wouldn't--nothing changed back there. You know, if it was--we continued with the house at our own risk. We still have to get all the stuff back around the front of the house,so we didn't change anything of tearing the pool out. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you very much. MR.JENKS: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Did you have anything? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. With that,we will go to--we'll start with registered speakers. As your name is called,please come up to one of the microphones, identify yourself for the record,and if your name is hard to spell,just please spell it for the court reporter so we don't get it mixed up. MR.REISCHL: The first speaker is Edward Tappen followed by George Marks. MR.TAPPEN: My name is Edward Tappen. I spell my name T-a-p-p-e-n. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MR.TAPPEN: Was there anything else? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No, sir,that's fine. We're off to a good start. MR.TAPPEN: For the last year I've been an advocate for having Collier County establish common municipal golf courses. Collier-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This--sir,are you here to talk about the golf course? MR.TAPPEN: Yes,I am. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: This is not that one. MR.TAPPEN: Pardon me? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're not talking about that right now. It's coming up in about-- MR.REISCHL: That's the next item. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's the next item. This is about a pool variance,swimming pool variance. MR.TAPPEN: Okay. Sony. I thought my name was called. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No problem. Save his card for later. MR.REISCHL: There was no item listed on it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No,I'm sorry. It was a mix-up on our part. MR.TAPPEN: Will I be back soon? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I hope so. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: We hope. MR.REISCHL: And I know I called Mr.Marks next,but his attorney,Patrick Neale,requested to go before Mr.Marks. Page 16 of 46 January 19,2017 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. MR.REISCHL: Patrick Neale followed by George Marks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And,by the way,for those of you who have not attended our meetings before, speakers are limited to three minutes unless waived. We generally don't enforce that as long as the information you're providing is not redundant and it's not repetitive. So we're here to listen to you. Just be conscious of everybody's time,please. Thank you. MR.NEALE: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Patrick Neale,N-e-a-1-e,for Mr.and Mrs. Marks who are in opposition to this variance. What I'd like to bring the Board's attention to is--the Commission's attention to is more the legal issues that revolve around this. As you're probably aware,there are,you know,eight criteria that are involved in the granting of a variance. A variance is not something that's to be taken lightly. There's a great deal of case law out there on variances,and I'm not about to bore anybody with doing what I have to do all day,which is read case law,so I'm not going to do that. But what I'd like to bring to the Board's attention is a case called Indialantic versus Nance,which really sets out the primary issues as to a zoning variance. And the prerequisite to a granting of the variance is the presence of an exceptionally unique hardship to the individual landowner,unique to that parcel and not shared by other property owners in the area. There's nothing unique about this situation for the landowner. The landowner simply went in,had a design professional who did not know what they were doing,frankly. They came in and submitted a plan that was in error based on the evidence of record at this point,and then proceeded to build based on that. Now,yes,they did rely on the county's assertions,but in my experience in dealing with county permits--and I've been here for a while--typically the permit says that it's the responsibility of the landowner and their design professionals to meet the code. It's not the responsibility of the county to make sure the design professionals did their jobs properly. So we'll go through--and I'm going to very briefly go through the eight different criteria--any special conditions and circumstances particularly land, location, size,and characteristics of the structure. And in this case there are none. These are essentially lots that are all pretty much the same within a development wherein the Land Development Code sets out what the standards are for this kind of construction. And we've heard ad nauseam what the standards are,as it's a--it's a 20-foot setback here. And this is a significant deviation from that. It's a 50 percent deviation from the setback,and it's about a 60 percent deviation from the height. So it's a very significant deviation. Any special circumstances do not result from the action of the applicant. Every problem here results from the actions of the applicant. The applicant is the one who made the error in submitting the application. Yes,the county may have messed up,and they occasionally do that,but in this case, still it's the applicant who had--who made the erroneous application. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant? I say that this is not unnecessary undue hardship because they're the one that made the mistake in the first place. Will the variance,if granted,be the minimum variance to make possible a responsible use of the land,building,or structure? The minimum use of this is to build a house,and they're going to be able to build a house;they're just not going to be able to put their pool as close to the water as they want it to be. Will it confer on the applicant any special privilege that's denied by these zoning regulations? Well, yes,it does. What it does is allow this person to build their pool where no one else can build it under the same set of circumstances. So,yes,they are getting a special privilege. Is it going to be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the LDC and not injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to public welfare? Well, it's not in harmony with the LDC;that's clear. And I will get testimony here later that will state that it's injurious to the neighborhood. Natural conditions or physically induced conditions? No,there's no natural conditions or physically induced conditions. This was a bare lot in a subdivision. Will it be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Well,yes, it is. I will admit to that; so it is Page 17 of 46 January 19, 2017 consistent with the Growth Management Plan. So,therefore,I mean,I believe and I would argue that this doesn't meet any of the criteria for the granting of a variance and that the variance should be denied. And so that is all I have to say. Thank you very much. Any questions,please? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. Patrick,do you have-- Pat,I've got a couple. MR.NEALE: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The Atlantic(sic)case that you cited is a 1982 case? MR.NEALE: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I did notice you didn't provide it as backup. And did you do any research to verify that the variance criteria language in there--in that case in 1982 was identical to the variance language--let me finish first. One at a time. MR.NEALE: Sorry. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That way it's identical language that we have in today's code. Because in 1982,we didn't even have--our GMP wasn't even enacted yet. So we had--that was an 82-2 code in Collier County. Have you done any of that research? MR.NEALE: Yes,I did;I did. And I went through and,what we call, Shepardized the case and checked future cases and,basically,they all mirror the same language. And,actually,our code very closely mirrors the language that's set out in Indialantic and other cases that are subsequent in its progeny,so... CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You didn't bring any of that with you? MR.NEALE: I didn't. I wasn't going to make full-blown legal argument here because-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,we definitely would have appreciated you doing that. MR.NEALE: I can do that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You said it's not in harmony. How come it is in harmony in the community that I believe you actually lived at on Marco Island? How come it's in harmony in Isle of Capri? How come that height would have been in harmony elsewhere in the county but,uniquely at Vanderbilt Beach, it's not in harmony? MR.NEALE: Well,as you know,legislative decisions are made. This is--obviously,that would be a legislative decision setting out the code as opposed to a quasi-judicial decision. And legislatures can make decisions such as that based on the character of that particular community. So the legislature as it was,the County Commission,or those--Marco City Council made those decisions at that point in time. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I can ask staff this,but I think you probably have the same answer. This Board's responsibility is to review consistent to the Land Development Code; is that not true? MR.NEALE: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Next speaker,please. MR.REISCHL: Next speaker is George Marks,followed by David Galloway. MR.MARKS: Good morning,everyone. My name is George Marks. I live at 319 Lagoon Avenue in Naples. And I am a licensed architect,and I am here for a reason that I think is important to the entire community of Vanderbilt Beach. What has--I,quite frankly,myself and the other neighbors,we feel badly for the people that are trying--the applicants here that are building this property. They hired a designer,they hired a builder,they hired everybody to build this for them,and their house has been built. And,quite frankly,we think they're building a nice house. The problem becomes the issue of the pool,and the problem becomes not just the--not just the issue of the fact of the way this exists now,but the precedent it sets going forward. We don't believe there's a hardship here. We all know that you can't create your own hardship.I've sat on your side of the table. I understand the legal on--Mr.Neale has already addressed that,and I'm not going to repeat that. But the key issue that Mr. Shapiro stated was that all of his pictures were taken from aerial views. It Page 18 of 46 January 19, 2017 did not show the actual height of the pool. I can use the--your projector there. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We need to have something kept. You can't--you'll need to send that to--can you send that to staff-- MR.MARKS: I will email it to Mr.Reischl as soon as we're done. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. MR.MARKS: Okay. If you--can you--does that work okay? Can everybody kind of see that? So if you look at the pool over here that is on the right-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's not on, sir. MR.MARKS: Thank you. If you look at the pool that's set over here on the right,this pool is six-and-a-half feet above the seawall. I'm rounding,of course. This is the property directly adjacent to it,and you can see that in that case the pool is significantly within the zoning. If you look at the property to the other side--so on both sides of this property you can see the pool over here on the adjacent property,that is also within the guidelines,and significantly lower than the height of the pool that is being provided here. We're here trying to be practical,and we're here to understand that this is a difficult situation,but we believe that when the county enacted their zoning law,there are pools that exist that are higher--at the higher level,but in good planning--we moved to Collier County because you've done such a great job with planning. All that we're asking you for is to enforce the actual zoning laws that you put in place. You lowered the height of the pool,and you gave them the option of building--if you're greater than a 20-foot setback, you have to be lower. If you're set back,you can be higher. Why is that? It's for visual corridor. What we don't want to have happen and the main reason I'm here is that we do not want this variance to be granted and then the next person that's further away from the gulf says,well,now I do have a hardship because you allowed that pool to stay in exact,not being within code,and then this becomes a cancer that spreads throughout the entire Vanderbilt community. We are just asking you to enforce the laws that you have. We understand the burden. I'm not going to use the word"hardship"because that's a legal term that we do not believe applies here. To not be unreasonable,we as the neighbors that are objecting and asking that this be held,we understand that all the dimensional variance has already been talked about. This is 60 percent higher. It's 60 percent closer to the canal than it should be. Our concern is that the visual corridor,Mr. Strain,that you spoke about,becomes narrowed.And if you allow this to continue across the whole length of the canal,that visual corridor is diminished. This is not a property on the gulf or on a wide canal. If you allow this to happen,it narrows that visual corridor as much as 20 feet for that entire corridor for a corridor that's not that wide to begin with. That's the reason we're here. That's the reason we're spending our dollars in hiring Mr.Neale,and that's the reason we're making(sic)our time to be here tonight. Our suggestion to make a compromise solution to this--and you asked Mr. Shapiro if he came with a compromise. You asked him if he had a solution. We're here to offer a solution. Our suggestion is that the fact that they are even--they're even violating their own 10-foot setback requirement by three and a half feet. Our suggestion is,leave the layout where it is but lower the height. If you look at this photograph, you can see how it is grossly higher than the properties that are adjacent to it. And our--you can see it in that picture very clearly. Our--we're not trying to be unreasonable.We're offering a reasonable solution that says,lower the pool to the required height setback,because we believe that is the bigger issue than the setback. The setback, the steps being six inches wider,we're not here to object to that. We're hoping to have the variance defeated. If we have to,and we have to go to the commissioners and that is--and this variance is granted,we are prepared,because of the importance of this issue by not creating a precedent to appeal at a higher level,we would much rather be reasonable people and have a reasonable solution today that takes care of this issue. Thank you. Page 19 of 46 January 19, 2017 COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Could I ask you a question? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Stan? MR.MARKS: Please do. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: The house--as I understand it,that white house,the floor is built to FEMA elevation? MR.REISCHL: Correct. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: How come it looks so much higher than the other two? Are they not? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't know. I don't think he could answer that. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Well,if you took the pool out,you'd still be looking at a white face of the wall of the house because it's built to FEMA elevation. You wouldn't see anything different from this view that I'm looking at if you took the entire pool out. So it would still look the same as--you know,higher than the houses on both sides. MR.MARKS: This view is not the objection.The objection is when you're on the adjacent properties and you're looking out the canal,the fact that pool is six-and-a-half feet above. If it was at the four-feet requirement,you would still be able to see and have a visual--not as detrimentally impact the visual barter(sic). COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. So this view,even though you showed it,doesn't really mean anything? MR.MARKS: We did not wish to violate the neighbors'rights and walk on their property to take these pictures. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: And the neighbors have no problem with this? MR.MARKS: I'm not--the neighbors-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We haven't heard all the testimony. MR.MARKS: We heard that objection on the 43 versus eight. I'm not here to exaggerate any issues. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. I'm just--I was just curious what the objection was with that view. It will look like that when they take the pool out. MR.MARKS: I'm using that view to just show the gross difference in the heights. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. Thanks. MR.MARKS: Thank you. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: But that's due to FEMA. MR. MARKS: That's not the issue in play here.The issue in play here is the pool,not the height of the building. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Okay. MR.MARKS: We have no objections to the height of the building. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Go ahead,Joe. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I want to go along the same lines. Mr.Marks,is it? MR.MARKS: Yes,sir. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Just,again,for the record,you're showing a comparison to the height.But you do not have any information on when that house that you're showing now,the brown house, which,as I look at it,to the--from the back,to the left,you don't have any information on when that was built or what the base flood elevation requirements were for that--on that house when it was constructed; likewise,the house on the right? There's been significant changes--and you know this,you're an architect--in the flood elevation requirements,as Stan alluded to,the base flood elevation,and mandated by the flood zone. And,regardless, you made a statement about reducing the height. They can only reduce the height of the pool,not the house. MR.MARKS: Absolutely. We have no objection to the height of the house. The purpose of this variance is only the pool,and we're keeping our comments just to the pool. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Right. So but the house--clearly,the house that you're showing here to the left of the home that's in question,as I look at it from the back,the base flood elevation is clearly a Page 20 of 46 January 19, 2017 different elevation than what was now required. MR.MARKS: I am not in a position to answer that one way or the other,sir. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. You brought up the comparison. I'm pointing out the difference. MR.MARKS: Understood. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I have a question,a couple questions. First is the County Attorney's Office in regards to the--now,this setting a precedent. Could one of the county attorneys opine on whether this does or not? MR.KLATZKOW: Does it set a precedent? No. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Mr.Marks,are you licensed in the state of Florida as an architect? MR.MARKS: My firm does work here. I am personally not licensed. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: In the state of Florida? MR.MARKS: Correct. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are you licensed at all? MR.MARKS: I am,yes,sir. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What state? MR.MARKS: Pennsylvania. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You indicated that they could leave the pool but lower the height. As an architect,I don't know if you do structural engineering or designing as well. Do you do just architect or do you do structural included in your firm? MR.MARKS: I have a BS in structural engineering. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Do you know that this is built with grade beams and piling? MR.MARKS: Ido. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: How would you expect them in to lower the pool? MR.MARKS: They would have to remove the pool. They'd have to cut off the top of the piles,they have to remove the grade beams. I understand the implications. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I just want the audience to understand and the people on this panel to understand it. Thank you. You indicated that--the concern about the view corridor going up and down east and west of that canal. First of all,you live opposite the water from this unit down a little bit about--over a hundred feet away; is that correct? The canal's a hundred feet wide,an assumption. MR.MARKS: I am two properties down across the canal. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Your concern is up and down the canal and you feel--I thought you stated that if this went to four feet,as required by the code,and they left it that location,they could actually build the cage like the house you have on the left here. How would a 4-foot-high pool with a cage like that change the view perception when we're only talking two-and-a-half feet overall? So what--how do you see that happening when you could still put the same structures on top of the deck and have the same view corridor that you've got with or without the two-and-a-half feet? MR.MARKS: You can see through a cage. It's a little tough to see through concrete. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So up and down that canal people would be seeing through these cages to get views of the waterway? MR.MARKS: If that is what is permitted by code,I support it. I'm only asking that the county enforce the zoning code as they have presented it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. That's all I've got. COMMISSIONER EBERT: I have a question. Is the seawall at the same level for these properties? Is the seawall all even? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. If you look at this map,this is an example of what I was trying to get the applicant to have responded to earlier. That seawall they put in,according to the certified building permits,it's one foot higher than the seawall to the left. This actually shows that.And I'm assuming that you are not any more familiar with this than I am in that regard. Page 21 of 46 January 19,2017 MR.MARKS: I would look at the picture same as you saw it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That one foot I'm not sure was taken into consideration when this whole variance height part of it came into play because the surveys I'm showing called out the old height of the seawall,not the new height that was certified to,which changes the deviation of a foot. So instead of 50 or 60 percent off,we're a little bit--we're another foot,which will take it down substantially. I'm just not sure how anybody measured this or where the measurement came from. MR.MARKS: I would believe some verification would be there,because if the--if the actual deck is six-and-a-half feet above that seawall,the condition's actually worse. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. But according to the information supplied,it's six-and-a-half feet above 3.2. That's the old height,not the new height. And that's the best I can tell you from the documents I've read,so... MR.MARKS: I'm not in a position to-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It would have been to the benefit of the applicant to have researched that.I wish they had. I don't have any other questions. Thank you,sir. MR.MARKS: Thank you,everyone. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Next speaker,Fred. MR.REISCHL: Next speaker is David Galloway followed by Nancy Burns. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By the way,we will take a break at 10:30. MR.GALLOWAY: David Galloway,resident of the Vanderbilt Beach residents area. And,you know,we listen to these issues many times. I have to applaud the Planning Commission.I know there's a lot of research done on your part;I really appreciate it as just an average citizen out in Collier County. I feel for the true applicants,the owner of the property,because it's not their fault even though they hired the contractor,the architects,and whatever,and I feel for them on this issue. I somewhat feel for the builder,the architects,but they didn't do their homework. They didn't do it properly. And even if it was a new employee or newer employee that was--new issues from Marco Island, they obviously didn't know Collier County, so I think that the Collier County has a true problem here as us as the government. I think possibly that when we start issuing hardship variances based on financial,it's--we should not be making other people's problems our problems,and I say that in all respect,because we've all been through this. I think the only people that make really some fees here are the attorneys. If you look,both sides have attorneys.And it's unfortunate they have to spend the money on their attorneys. It's unfortunate on both sides. I come here free gratis,my time,but it's also an issue that I think we have to--we have great zoning, and code ordinances in Collier County over the years have been developed very strongly,and I support those; I follow them as they've been developed and the people that do--the commissioners that do enact them. But we have to do this equally and fairly across all lines. And it's a slippery slope when we start granting variances just based on financial hardship even though it's 50,000,25,000,or 100,000. But also the county should be responsible for some of this also and not just saying,well,everybody made a mistake. Let's just let it go away,because it's not fair to the other citizens that live in that community also. So I speak only as a concerned citizen that we have to constantly,in the Collier County,enforce the ordinances and the code equally across the board so that there's--we don't have these kind of long,drawn-out Planning Commission meetings where everybody gets involved in these. And I think that--overall,I think this could be remedied,but it's an issue that's going to come up again,as we know, someplace in the county,whether it's Marco Island or whether it's here,and northern Collier County,but it's an issue that has to be addressed,and we have to get the personnel that are going to be reviewing this and looking at these things so it doesn't come to this point again. Thanks. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. We have time for one more speaker. Page 22 of 46 January 19,2017 MR.REISCHL: Nancy Burns. MR. SHAPIRO: We have a speaker that has to leave at 10:30. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sir,we're--okay. Yeah.You're not supposed to be doing that. Thank you. MS.BURNS: Nancy Burns,and I'm a resident of Vanderbilt Beach,Gulf Shore Drive. Anyway,I do support the Planning Board,and I do believe that the county has an obligation to validate our issues and also support the codes. I really feel for the people. I'm sorry that it's happened for them,but I do feel code should be enforced. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. That was quicker than I thought. We have one speaker, apparently,who has to leave at 10:30. On that basis,we'll try to accommodate them if they'd like to come up to the microphone. Identify yourself for the record. MR.JORGENSON: Thank you for doing that. I appreciate it. My name is Jerry Jorgenson. I live at 367 Lagoon Avenue. I've been there for 11 years. I have to disagree with Mr.Marks fantastically about the views. With all the trees,palm trees, everything that we have,you can't see up and down the canals anyway. I live right across the street from this property. I looked at a garbage home for 10 years.I had to call inspectors out to get it cleaned up because there was renters there at one time,and the lady was very nice enough to get it taken care of for me. I'm going to tell you something;I drive those canals all the time,and there's a lot of these high things out there, some prior to the codes, some changed. And,by the way,that wall you're talking about,all the new ones go in now,and you're probably aware,that they are a foot higher now. So whenever you put in a new seawall, it has to go up one foot higher than the old seawalls,so we have seawalls going up and down,up and down until people build,so it really looks kind of ugly,to tell you the truth. It would be nice if we could all have our seawalls the same height. So there's a lot of issues that occur when you're building. In this case,I live directly across the street. I'm very pleased to see the house the way it is. I don't see it being an eyesore in any way,shape,or form. I'm sorry that the county made a mistake. If they wouldn't have,we wouldn't be standing here today. And maybe the builder made a mistake. The problem is, is what--your point you made regarding the cage or someone's point regarding the cage,that is exactly correct. It doesn't--if you go down our canal,we have some of the ugliest structures that you want to see. I do rather(sic)try to fight to get these things taken down like I did a lot of huts that used to be on the thing.They were falling apart during the hurricanes,and they fmally took them down. The county come out and said,they're not in compliance;take them down. And then these grass hut things. But on our canal on his side that he looks at,he looks at a lot worse thing than that,I can tell you. We have double-deck wooden structures. They were built,you know,back in the day when you could do that,okay,and they were ugly as heck;painted,peeling,ugly-looking decks. There's one guy who keeps his up nice. The other one,he's got a big tent on top of it. I mean,you're talking about--as you're going out of the canal,we're talking about a beautiful home that's going to have a beautiful--they have every intentions of putting shrubberies and stuff in there. And I don't care what he says;you can't see up and down regardless. I could stand on that side of the canal and sit at Marge and Rich's house on their patio,okay--I go over there and visit them a lot--and we can look right down the canal,and you know, it doesn't obstruct anything. All of our homes,our views,even my home which was built a long time ago--I walk out to my pool from ground level because we were built before the codes changed. And I didn't build it; somebody else did. And when we sit up in our home--we live up in the upper level of our home--we see everything because we have a northern view,you know,looking--and it's--we're so happy this is going up that I'm ecstatic. We have a lot of old homes still in our area,and they keep going down. And as you go out the canal--I don't know,Mr.Marks'house,whoever,he's got a big pool wall with a sand thing next to it. It's,in my opinion,very unattractive to look at. Not his wall but,you know--it's just fine.It's the way it is. And he's allowed to do that,and that's fine. We don't have an issue with it.I don't know him very well,and that's his business what he wants to do. Page 23 of 46 January 19, 2017 But in my opinion,you do have--do follow codes. I'm a car dealer. I've built dealerships.We go for variances all the time. You have to go for variances sometimes in life to make things easier and simpler to deal with. If you didn't have variances,what would we have to go back and even--let's just say they wanted a variance before they built because they needed to do it in this particular way because of room--they don't have much room--there's not much property there,so you have to kind of utilize it the best you can. And I'm going to tell you what; it's real nice looking across the street and seeing a beautiful home with a nice wall. And this gentleman Stan,he had a terrific point. I'd rather look at that pool wall than have that pool way down here. Now I'm looking at them trying to build steps to get down to the pool wall,and you're still looking at a wall. And I'm right across the street,literally. And the boat blocks the view anyway,but I like looking at boats,because I have one,too. So thank you for the time. I really appreciate it. And I hope you take under consideration that there's a lot of us there that have no objection to this. I mean,I talked to some of my neighbors;they're not here to speak for themselves,but they said,sure,we don't have a problem with this. I mean,what does it matter? I mean,I agree with rules and stuff,but this one fell through the cracks,and that's why you have variances. And I thank you guys and--for your time and efforts and the time you guys put into your jobs. Thank you so much for letting me speak early.Appreciate it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you,sir. Now,with that,we will take a break until 10:45,and then when we get back,we'll resume with public speakers and then after,the rest of our agenda. Thank you. (A brief recess was had.) MR.BOSI: Chair,you have a live mike. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. If everybody will please resume their seats. We left off with public testimony. We're going to resume with public testimony,and Fred will be calling the next speaker. MR.REISCHL: Steve Emens,followed by John Prestwood. MR.EMENS: I'm Steve Emens,331 Lagoon Avenue. I am the person who called in April because I noticed that going up. The main reason why I called is I know the code. And at that time,before--they had the slab down, before they built the ceiling,construction(sic)this,I wanted to give them the opportunity,because I knew it was going to cost them a lot of money at the end if they didn't get a variance or if they did not get it approved. That's why I called at that time. I couldn't believe that it got missed because you have your architect that has to do the site plan and the surveyor,your pool contractor has to submit plans with elevations on it,so that's another permit where the elevations got missed besides the basic permit. So the seawall guy submitted his and,yes,that seawall is up one foot,and the elevation of the deck,I measured it,is six foot from the new seawall. So that's where that stands. And I watched everybody come out and survey the whole property in April. And then nothing happened. Nothing happened. So now they're applying for a variance after the house is already built. Okay. We're so far along now,we can't do it. It cost too much money. The homeowner's not at fault,I understand.They depended upon a licensed architect;they depended upon a survey that should have been signed and sealed;they depended upon the pool contractor that should have had signed and sealed plans because it has engineering. You can't submit any plans without signed and sealed. You have to have your elevations on it. Now,those professionals are insured professionals,and they should know the codes in Collier County. The house is beautiful,okay. Nothing wrong with that. It's a great-looking house. The view's good. It's just that it's not to code. It got passed. I don't know what reason. I've seen things happen a lot of time where--well,I don't know the case, so I'm not going to speculate on it--where somebody said,hey,oh,can't you just do this for me? Sure we can. And then they build it,and then it's too late,without going back, resubmitting plans. I don't know that. But I do know across the street there's a new house under construction about the same stage they are. Page 24 of 46 January 19, 2017 They're putting their trusses on right now.The house is 20-foot setback. The pool is a 10-foot setback,and it's 10-foot,and they have their stairs coming down. And in reference to FEMA code,I know that swimming pools and auxiliary setbacks do not have to be at that FEMA height. They can be below FEMA height. But you can build anywhere in Vanderbilt at grade without a height requirement for that pool to be FEMA. It's the pool equipment,electronics,and the main house structure. And that's my understanding. So that's-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Stan? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: You said you called. Who did you call? MR.EMENS: I called Code Enforcement first.I didn't know whether it was a building or a code violation. That's where I noticed it was-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: A slip came in from Joseph Norris,who is a code compliance for the Contractor Licensing. That's the memo in the file that says you called them. It's got your cell number 860 something or other? MR.EMENS: Yeah, 8070. Yeah. I called him.He goes,oh,no,I'm going to forward that on to whomever. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,the only record,the only report is for code licensing. I found under--Code Enforcement didn't get involved at that point. So your call into licensing isn't-- MR.EMENS: Well,yeah,because they turned it right over to that. They said,oh,you're calling the wrong people here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,he went out and took pictures and photographs of the site. So he actually did some of the followup. MR.EMENS: Right,and that's where it all started back then. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: And there's pictures that show what stage it was at when this call was made? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure. We can put them on the overhead if you'd like. This is basically--it's a similar stage to what you've already got. MR.EMENS: Yeah. I knew it was going to be trouble. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: There's seven or so pictures. That's one of them. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: And what stage was it at? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: About what it is today.They have a--I think-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: So the house was there? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. MR.EMENS: Not in April it wasn't all there.They poured the slab,and they were putting up-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr.Norris went out and took these pictures after--in response to the call. So I didn't--I mean,I haven't got one of the house. That's a picture of what you just about saw. MR.EMENS: Right. The pool was there because they built it before the house went up. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. MR.EMENS: But then when I saw that,it was out--I went over,I measured it. I--and I'm thinking,okay,you going to do your final survey at the end,and now-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: What did you measure it with? Did you use a-- MR.EMENS: Tape measure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tape measure? MR.EMENS: Yeah,yeah. I hooked it on the-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Now,you're the complainant,and you went on the property that you filed a complaint against to show that they were in error.Did you get their permission to go on their property? MR.EMENS: No,I did not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. That's kind of odd.I don't know--I've never heard anybody doing that before. MR.EMENS: Well,no,I just walked around and-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Trespassed. Page 25 of 46 January 19,2017 MR.EMENS: I just saw it,and I wasn't sure,okay, so I measured it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You have some--I noticed in looking at your name--and I didn't have your last name;I had your phone number. When I plugged the phone number in to Google,it came up--you had some YouTubes done,and I guess you do pool work for Nassau Pools. MR.EMENS: I build swimming pools,and that's how I knew the code. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. Okay. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I'm still curious what stage the house was at,because the information I got before was that the house was partially up when this happened,and he's saying the house was not up at all. MR.EMENS: Well,the walls were up,but it was clear access. You could come straight through the front over the slab right to get to the pool at that time. There was no--nothing inside. It was open. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I think we can let this one go for now. That's more if the applicant wants to deal with the trespass;that's not our issue. Thank you,sir. MR.EMENS: Yeah. Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Next speaker,please. MR.REISCHL: John Prestwood followed by Ronald Rossbach. MR.PRESTWOOD: John Prestwood,P-r-e-s-t-w-o-o-d. I'm a neighbor also on Lagoon.And I just wanted to support Mr.Marks'and Mr.Emens'comments and those from Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association that I'm concerned with the code,again,not being enforced. And I realize the more I hear here, it's a very complex situation in terms of the number of errors or perhaps the number of missteps that have been made along the way. I'm in insurance by trade;retired now. I also wondered about the liability that someone else will probably need to determine in this regard,depending upon how you rule,but there is errors and omissions insurance also with respect to the professionals all mentioned here: Architects,builders,engineers,and so forth. I don't know about the county. I wouldn't surmise on that. But it seems like there's a lot of missteps that have been made. So I would encourage you to enforce the code.If there's something that can be done to accommodate things,fine. As far as materiality, $50,000,maybe that's for you to decide. We're talking about multi-million-dollar homes here in this neighborhood. Fifty thousand dollars on a house in Golden Gate might be a lot different than$50,000 in Vanderbilt Beach. That's all I have to say. I support the--Mr.Marks',Mr.Emens'comments,and I appreciate your work. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir. Next speaker? MR.REISCHL: The next speaker, Ronald Rossbach followed by Margaret Rossbach. MR.ROSSBACH: Hi. I'm Ronald Rossbach. I live at 355 Lagoon,just opposite the canal,in the canal where the house is. I just want to know let you know we have no objections. As a matter of fact,we felt that the whole situation there,the building and the boat and everything,just enhances our view of the canal. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you, sir. MR.REISCHL: The final registered speaker is Margaret Rossbach. MS.ROSSBACH: My name is Margaret Rossbach.I am Ronald's wife. I live at 355 Lagoon Avenue,and I'm directly across from house in question. And before that,we have been--we built our house in 1980. We've been here over 30 years,and we love it here. This is paradise. And from a woman's point of view,this is so gorgeous that it just enhances the neighborhood,and I don't understand why--or I won't understand if this is not going to be approved because it's just all positive. Before that,then there was a house that it was a duplex. It was much older than our house.I'm sure Jerry, if he was here,he would say I'm one of the houses that he doesn't like,but I love my home,and it's Page 26 of 46 January 19, 2017 going to be there until I kick the bucket. And I'm 86 years,going to be 87. So they're going to have to wait a while,because they take such good care of you here in Naples that sometimes you live to be 90 something. So this is not the first time I'm going to come here to beg you to just let this go on and let us all be happy. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you,ma'am. Next speaker? MR.REISCHL: That was your fmal registered speaker. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Would you put something on the overhead. I need to clarify one item. It's Page 10 of the staff report,which is the black-and-white survey. You don't have the staff report? MR.REISCHL: On my computer,electronically. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You guys. We need to have printers in this room,I can tell. Diane,can I borrow yours? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I've got scribbles on mine. MR.REISCHL: I was trying to keep up with the chairman on being electronic on this one. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,you've got to get an Apple then. Sony. MR.EASTMAN: The advantages of paper. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Actually,that's not the one--it doesn't show enough. The actual survey is the few pages back from that,Joe. Keep going. It's this one here. MR.REISCHL: Oh,the resolution. It's attached to the resolution,I believe. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. That's it. If you could let him borrow that,Patrick,that would be great;thank you. Okay. What I wanted to point out on here--and,actually,you need to zoom in a little bit on the part by the waterway. Right there. Notice on the lower right-hand corner it says, set drill hole on top of concrete seawall,and NAVD elevation, 3.32. That's the same elevation that the old seawall was at based on the permit application. Permit application said to cap it,add one foot to it so it would be 4.2,and it also was certified to that. Now, if you'll look over on the left, second note up, it says,per contractor,pool patio stem wall is at 9.9. Now,if you take 9.9,subtract the 3.2,you get your 6.6,which is the issue in question today.What I'm suggesting is it's not 9.9,and then the 3.2 is now 4.2,so the real difference is 5.6;5.6 is 18 inches over the four feet that's allowed. And I guess I've got a question to staff. At that 18 inches,would someone measure from the cap of the seawall,or they'd have to go next door and measure from the old seawall to determine the height that's supposed to be used for this deck? MR.REISCHL: Correct. This is the survey that was submitted. I spoke to Mr.Jones,one of the attorneys involved,I asked that,and this is what was resubmitted. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's not the question. MR.BOSI: The question: The new seawall,the seawall constructed at this property would be the benchmark for where that elevation would start. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. That's what I'm getting at. Now,we've heard testimony that probably--I can't--I have to question how it was obtained,that it was measured by the tape measure to be closer to six--well,five-and-a-half feet or whatever. I would suggest we maybe have an 18-inch discrepancy here instead of a 24-inch. But it's just something to consider as we go through this,and maybe the applicant, by the time they get to the Board of County Commissioners,will have that resolved. I would highly recommend to them that,rather than wait any longer,they do it right away. With that,I don't have any more questions at this time,but we do have an opportunity for the applicant-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Mark? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. Page 27 of 46 January 19, 2017 COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: While you're on that survey,I'm fascinated,upper left-hand corner,in the center line of Tradewinds Avenue,there's a NAVD nail(sic)and a couple in elevation 2.8,and I thought every road in Collier County was at five minimum. So I--you know,that just fascinates me. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. This is the time when the applicant's representative or the applicant themselves,someone,you have an opportunity to make a rebuttal if you want to do so. I either need to have you acknowledge you don't have a rebuttal or you'd like to utilize the time. MR. SHAPIRO: Sure. Do you mind if I use this? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Go right ahead. MR. SHAPIRO: I will be very brief,because I think a lot of the points were,I guess,well brought out and hit on. I would just like to bring out,and I think that the counsel here already has,is that this doesn't set any legal precedent as,of course,I believe most of you know,and I think that's what a lot of the objectors had issue with is that,you know,maybe this would set a precedent down the line. But as you know,under case law,these are done on an individual basis, so the ruling today doesn't set any precedent for future,and hopefully this problem won't happen again. Again, going by the staff report,I think,you know,there's enough blame to go around. You know,I am not saying that the petitioner's people,you know,maybe they should have done things more thoroughly, maybe the county should have reviewed it more thoroughly,but we have what we have here today,and we have a very unique circumstance because the permit was issued relying on the wrong setbacks,and because we have what we have here today,we can just make decisions going forward,and I just feel that the economic hardships of having to tear all that out and put a new pool in over somewhere between 18 inches and two-and-a-half feet would just be a very large hardship compared to the negligible impact that this has. So with that,I thank you for your consideration. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Okay. When we had some discussion earlier,I think a few of you indicated you had other questions you wanted to ask before we go--before we close the public hearing, so now is the time to do that. I can't remember-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: My questions are answered. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Everybody else? COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I'm all-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Deliberate. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then we will close the public hearing,and we will entertain discussion before we go for motion, if there's discussion. Does anybody have any discussion items they want to bring up? Joe? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And folks in the audience,I was the community development administrator from 2010 to 20--correction,2001 to 2009. So during that tenure,of course,I was responsible for all the zoning in the county as far as all the review and the building department,zoning department,and other departments under that organization,which there's been some changes since. But I left in 2009. So I have a clear understanding of the process. And the only reason I bring up my background,because this is not the first variance in this area. I could tell you that because we've had similar situations in the past where,because of the code,there is confusion or there still continues to be confusion which,frankly,when I received the packet,I was--as I said, it brought back some tough times in that department. But that said, it is an unfortunate circumstance. The design professional's responsible. The homeowner hires design professionals who are licensed, and they're responsible,and I clearly understand that. As an engineer I understand that. The issue at hand,though,is this is an area for redevelopment. It is the original Naples Park.It's been an issue for probably 30 years in the county as this area redeveloped,and these--all these lots redeveloped primarily because of the location,not as much as Naples Park has,but all these lots are--were teardowns and rebuilds. The issue in this area,Vanderbilt Beach,was a continual problem when I was in the county seven years ago,as it is,I guess,right now,because we're faced with the same situation of,clearly, 10 pounds of Page 28 of 46 January 19, 2017 flour in a 5-pound sack,because that's--most of these homes are maximizing the building envelope that's allowed. I do think it's an unfortunate circumstance but,however,from the standpoint of the variance,as far as I'm concerned,the house exists,the pool exists,and I'm ready to make a motion,if the--but I'll hold off until we make some further discussion. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm glad you said flour. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I did. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: The military term is blivet,b-l-i-v-e-t. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Does anybody else have any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I have one item I'd like to discuss. Mike or Fred,would you put what I just handed you on the overhead. You need to back off a little bit. Keep going. Keep going. Right there. So we can read the whole thing. Section 9.04.03 is our criteria for variances.You've heard today that there are eight criteria;there are. And we've had legal counsel advise us from the opposition side to address their position on those eight criteria. Also,a case was referred to us,an old case from a 1982 activity. But we here--as that attorney, even the opposition attorney and as staff has opined today,we're here to adhere to the Land Development Code. The Land Development Code says this in the beginning of the criteria for variances: "Findings: Before any variance shall be recommended for approval to the Board of the Zoning Appeals,the Planning Commission shall consider and be guided by the following standards in making a determination." So while we've heard that they're hard and fast rules,you've got to show a hardship,it can't be this kind of hardship,maybe so,but at the same time we shall consider those and be guided by them.That means it's not mandatory. And,Mike, if you read this differently as Zoning Director,please let me know. But it's my understanding that it means what it says,that we're not bound by those eight items,but they are for consideration. MR.BOSI: My understanding would be--the interpretation that you've adopted would be my understanding;that these are the guidelines and with that emphasis upon the guidelines. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And with that in mind,I have--I've listened to everything,and I've certainly tried to do all the research I can to understand how this happened. I can't see the benefit to force someone to tear down a home such as this. There's been no shown malicious intent in this. It was an--it was a human error. It was a mistake made by multiple parties. To take them to task for this for the cost that it would require for an item that does not set a precedent I don't think is necessary. Now,if we can show they purposely had misled the county,this was done intentionally,I'd say then whatever they deserve they deserve in regards to correcting it. But I have looked at all the records. I have looked at them probably more thoroughly than anybody in this room,and I can assure you nothing like that came out of any of those records. And they're records that this panel doesn't even have access to. They're in the county records department. I've pulled all the folders. There's nothing there that shows malicious intent. In fact,if anything,they were trying to continually keep up with things they needed to to make sure their approvals were consistent and reviewed by the county. So I certainly think that the variance is warranted in this case,whether the variance is 24--two-and-a-half feet--yeah,two-and-a-half feet or 18 inches. Either way, it really doesn't matter. The pool's there,and it should be approved. The only thing I would suggest is that a stipulation be added to do make sure that the intent of where these are allowed at this height,which is everywhere else,basically,but Vanderbilt Beach,that the decorative cladding or landscaping and a berm or a combination thereof of some nature is there, is put in front or applied to this wall to soften it,as the other jurisdictions would have--where they had done so in other parts of the county. Page 29 of 46 January 19, 2017 And with that,that's all I've got to say.And if there's nobody else here,we'll close the public hearing and we'll entertain a motion. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I make a motion to approve. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I'll second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Will that motion be subject to the stipulation for the-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Subject to the stipulations as discussed. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Second. MR.REISCHL: And the staffs stipulation,too. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Staff stipulation as well noting that,subject to the 50 percent rule, that anything constructed thereafter would have to require compliance with the existing code. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion's been made to recommend approval for the variance subject to staffs recommendation and the one stipulation we just discussed. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: All in favor,signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Anybody opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion carries 6-0. Thank you,all,for attending this morning.We appreciate it. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Mark,could I ask something? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: I was very impressed by the drone photos,and I would think that--seriously,I don't know why the county doesn't do that on a lot of these projects. And I don't know what it takes to legally do drone photos or buy drones,but it seems like,you know,we're the county;we ought to have that kind of photography coming to these meetings instead of the petitioner. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: It's a great idea.The challenge is the FAA. I can tell you,as a realtor,they're really cracking down. There's a lot more criteria as to where and when you can fly.I've got to be honest,I don't know with that drone shot--and I'm not trying to open up a can of worms here,I've been told in the past those drones aren't allowed to fly over Vanderbilt Beach either or over that area. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I would have to--I'd have to agree. The last thing I'd-- COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: A can of worms? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: --like to see is the government having the power of drones. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Stay away from that. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: No trespassing and no drones. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: We work with Luddites. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh, Stan. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Stan,stay with Google Earth. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: ***Okay. That takes us into the next item,the only item remainingon today's agenda. It's the review of the Land Development Code for both the preservation,I believe,open space and conservation of golf course areas,and this will be a presentation made by staff,Caroline Cilek. It will be our second or third time around for some of these,and not the final. MS.CILEK: Correct. Good morning. Caroline Cilek,for the record. I would like to go through the amendment that has the most individuals here for public comment first, if that's okay with-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do you know what that is,or do you want me to ask? Page 30 of 46 January 19, 2017 MS.CILEK: I don't. If you could ask. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: How many people are here for the golf course amendment? (Show of hands.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: How many people are here for anything else but that? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh,I think it's the golf course amendment. MS.CILEK: Thank you for asking. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Let's move right into that,then,Caroline. Just tell us what page of the staff report to start with. MS.CILEK: All righty. We are going to take a look at--the narrative begins on Page 24,and we have highlighted text that has been amended since we last saw you. And I'm happy to answer questions on the narrative. Mostly,it was just explaining the changes in the LDC text. There are a couple of errors,but we highlighted those and fixed them. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That narrative was,yeah,pretty much just the corrections we talked about last time or the other things you caught. Does anybody have any narrative questions and on the--no? COMMISSIONER EBERT: Caroline,I will be calling you,though,because I missed the last meeting,and I know this is a very important-- MS.CILEK: Okay. COMMISSIONER EBERT: --subject for this county. So with the three different reports that we've had so far,I will be in contact with you,because I want to get it down right. MS.CILEK: No problem. I'm always available. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well, let's move directly into the LDC language. MS.CILEK: Super. That begins on Page 34,and we've added a new LDC section to this amendment and are amending 3.05.07,part of the preservation standards,and this is in regards to basically mirroring and supporting another provision that we're adding in the greenway area of the code so that it's consistent throughout. And I would like to explain it when we get to that portion because I think it will be a little easier to understand. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. That will take us to your--that's the first section of highlighting on Page 34,right? MS.CILEK: Yep. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Then when we move to Page 35,we've got some more. MS.CILEK: So Page 35 we begin the 5.05.15 language. And I have a couple of small changes I'd like to just share with you so that when we bring the amendment back on the 30th, it's as clean as possible. We would like to change in B on B3,compatibility design review,that last sentence,we're going to remove that word"permitted."Permitted conditional use is a little bit awkward,and we're just going to start that sentence off with identifying the conditional uses. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Caroline,also. MS.CILEK: Yep. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: I'm sorry. Right before that under B 1,2 and 3,it talks about utilizing a use, and I think you want to put"where the proposed use." So,for example,zoning actions,this section applies to a golf course constructed in any zoning district where the proposed use is not currently. MS.CILEK: Okay. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: And I would make that similar type of change under 1,2,and 3. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Great. MS.CILEK: I could do that. So we're just going to clean up the last sentence of 3,and then we made the change to "constructed" consistent throughout A. My next changes are on Page 36 under the DAS,the Developer's Alternative Statement. And here our changes are under 2.B.I.A and B,and these were in reference to our discussion at the last meeting.And Page 31 of 46 January 19, 2017 staff was also thinking about,you know,how to relate the golf course to the HOAs that exist or may exist during the conversion process. And so this is what we have proposed for our language. I'd like to just get your feedback and see if this will work for the Planning Commission. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's better. Yeah. It gets us there. MS.CILEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Last week,I think it was,or maybe early--yeah,I think it was last week--one of the land use attorneys,Richard Yovanovich,was talking to me about something else,and I could tell he was really excited about the golf course conversion standards. And one of the things that he mentioned--and it was a good point. I'll have to concede that--that there is no time frames for response to these. So if someone puts them on the table,how long have they got to sit there before they're considered qualified and met that criteria? And I think that's a very good point. We need to make sure it's tightened up that way. And I'd suggest by the time we come back we figure out a way to address that. MS.CILEK: Sure. In previous drafts we had proposed time frame in particular for 2.B.II,but it's my understanding that generally the County Attorney's Office doesn't support timelines. But I'd be happy to start that conversation again with them and see if it's something we can include. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well,I mean,I'm just concerned if, say,we require--well, obviously, if this goes through, someone's required to meet that standard. So there's a letter out there now on the Riviera golf course,for example.It says they want$3.5 million,and they're offering it to the county and maybe others and international investors and all this. Well,how long before we can say,okay,they offered it to these various groups,there was no response,yet they go and sell it to another builder or somebody that tries to put homes there,and the other groups say,wait a minute. We haven't responded to that offer yet. I think out of fairness to everybody,a time frame ought to be established,and maybe there's a way the County Attorney's Office could see fit to find something to include here. If not,then we need,I guess,the legal--I'd like to know the understanding how we deal with it legally in regards to when does an offer expire. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Well,I'd prefer not to put a time limit in there and to just apply a reasonableness standard. This is something they have to prepare a report as to the alternatives and what they did,and that's something that you can question as they go forward. But I can't imagine that,you know,they'd be able to get through the application process with only giving them a couple weeks,because we know how it takes--how long it takes to get through the process to begin with. So--but if you want a date,we'll come up with a time frame. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,I would just want to make sure that--and I'm sure--Mr.Yovanovich is here today, so I'm sure he's going to jump in. And now that I brought this up,I'm sure we'll hear more,but I would like to make sure we have a reasonable understanding on how this unfolds so that,for example,the offer that's on the county right now from the owner of Riviera,that's how this one came about. They sent a letter over to the commissioner and said,we're considering selling this. Is the county interested in buying it? What if the county doesn't respond for two or three years and they decide after they've sold to somebody else we want to buy it? I think that's the scenario I'm concerned about, so... MS.ASHTON-CICKO: I mean,I would be reluctant to put a period longer than 30 days after the date that they issue an offer letter because I think that we could have some problems with,you know, interfering with the transfer of property if they're looking to sell it to other parties and,also,I don't want to get into takings claims or anything like that, so... CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. I understand. Thank you. MS.CILEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's all I've got to say on it. Never mind. We'll listen to Mr. Yovanovich's argument and go from there. MS.CILEK: Okay. On 2.B.III,the Conceptual Development Plan,we would like to just tidy up the sentence structure of the first sentence. We're going to break it into two parts. It's a compound sentence. It needs to be a little easier to read, so we'll share that with you at the next--no intent changes,just making it a little bit simpler to understand. Page 32 of 46 January 19, 2017 That's all the changes I have on 36. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MS. CILEK: Page 37,the cross-reference in 3.0 is incorrect. Line 20 needs to be Subsection G, which is the greenway. It moved. One thing I did want to ask you about is 3.D,Line 32. This is something that was an oversight on my part. At one of the previous Planning Commission meetings,we had talked about removing the word "reasonable"when talking about what the stakeholders are providing as input and that all input should be addressed. And in our admin code sections,we're actually going to get a little bit more detail about that,and we're going to say it be addressed in categories. So not every single question has to be listed out,but rather this category of question and provide a paragraph response. So that's a little easier for the applicant to be able to do that. But here we did not remove the term "reasonable." So I think on Line 32 in this section,we need to make this consistent with the following section and remove the"reasonable"term,because we want all input to be responded to,whether it's reasonable or not. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MS.CILEK: 4.B,Line 49 and Line 50,we have updated the language as requested by the Planning Commission and the County Attorney's Office,and this was regarding basically prohibiting deviations from this section. And that's all I have on that page. Anything else? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. MS.CILEK: Okay. Page 38,just some cleanup; in F.4 we're missing a couple small words. And then on Page 39,this is where we get into the good stuff,following up with our conversations regarding preserves on the golf course. All right. So down on G.3,Line 49,we took a comprehensive look at preserves. And I worked with our environmental staff to prepare this language.And we have two different concepts going on here.One is where we have isolated preserves less than a half an acre in size. We are supporting them to be able to re-create a preserve greater than that half an acre. Currently when that's done,a PUD deviation has to be requested and approved. Here we're saying you don't have to go through the PUD deviation request;you can just do that automatically. And then that's why we added 3.05.07 to this amendment so that it allows for that as well in that section. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: I do have a recommended change on this section. MS.CILEK: Sure. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Caroline asked to meet with me,but I wasn't available. Under Line 47,I would say, "The following preserve standard supplement" in place of"requirements are in addition to." So it would read, "The following preserve standard supplement,those in the LDC Section 3.05.07." MS.CILEK: That's great. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: And then I would combine the two sentences in A. So under Line 51,it would say, "Consolidated into appropriated preserve that may be greater than one acre in size in the aggregate to meet the preserve requirement,"and then you would delete the second sentence that's on the top of Page 340. MS.CILEK: We can do that. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody? MS.CILEK: Okay. And then on Page 40,the second concept is looking at existing preserves.And we've broken it into two sections to deal with straight zoning golf courses and PUD golf courses,because they are very different. So in the first one,B.I,we're looking at a straight zoning or conventional zoning district,the GC,or another zoning district that's straight zoning. And here we're saying that they may utilize that preserve that's on that golf course toward the new development,because it's a self-contained parcel of land zoned,and it's rezoned,and they can use that preserve as they move forward. Page 33 of 46 January 19, 2017 Under B.II,we're looking at a PUD. And here,when they put the preserve, it was in connection with the existing development within that PUD project,and so they would be able to use excess preserve on the golf course but not the preserve for the current PUD project because it's already been utilized by what was approved previously. Any questions on what we're proposing for the preserves? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Nope. Before you go down to H,I got a couple questions that probably fit into this category. MS.CILEK: Sure. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You and I touched on them a little bit,and I think the last meeting I asked about them. First of all,transportation. Many of these golf courses are within communities that are somewhat restrictive as far as the size of the roads go. They have existing density in there. We haven't addressed how that's supposed to be handled or looked at. Likewise,many of the golf courses only have small accessways to the roadways because they used them for either golf carts or maintenance carts. Well,putting a road system in,that's substantial. And I learned at a meeting I was at last week,it was--that some of these side--where they say a golf course was going to go in and they didn't have enough access,wide enough accessway,they wanted to pick up enough land to make it wide enough for a roadway. Well,the land on both sides,a lot of times, is deed restricted for single-family or residential housing. All that is going to come into play,and we haven't addressed it here. Is that something that--how would that come out of this process?Because it would be good to know that early on. If I was the applicant,I'd want to know,okay,I better get over some of these thresholds before I even go out to these people. We haven't addressed transportation,so--have you thought about addressing it in some manner? MS.CILEK: Well,two things to remember. One is that the Conceptual Development Plan on Page 36,which is requirement of the DAS and then is taken through the stakeholder outreach meetings and then is utilized through the land use petition process,does require that existing and proposed roadway and pedestrian systems are identified. So they're going to have to figure out how they're going to--what roadways are going to be used and how they're going to access this project.And then from there,our idea was that the standard LDC requirements for transportation would apply to the project. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. So that means that their widths for those accessways would have to meet our minimum standards and that there's not any exceptions into this process. MS.CILEK: Correct. It would be what is already in the LDC,and they would need to show that they would meet those. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And I-- MS.ASHTON-CICKO: But I believe if they're doing, like,a PUD amendment,they could ask for a deviation to,you know,reduce the widths like they do with most petitions. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. And that's just something that would have to be considered on it's own merit. MS.CILEK: That would be-- MS.ASHTON-CICKO: And as you know,but maybe the others don't,as part of our review,we do check to make sure that they have legal access. We confirm that on all the projects. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: But your legal access in the way you look at it is--you analyze the width of the accessway in regards to the minimum standards of the code,or you take into consideration the deviation--how do you evaluate? MS.ASHTON-CICKO: We'd be confirming that they have an easement that allows them to use those roadways for access. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Those accessways for,like,a public road or private-- MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Or a private road. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: --or a private road,because a lot of times those may be restricted to golf course access only. In fact,I know one golf course that is deed restricted and so that those connections can Page 34 of 46 January 19, 2017 only be used for golf maintenance vehicles or golf carts. That,then,wouldn't meet your standard as far as public access roadway that had to be redone. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: They'd have to clean that up through the courts. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And at the same time,the width of the roadway would be something that you wouldn't necessarily--would you care about that in your legal review,or would you defer that to the review later on? I mean,if they come up with a 30-foot access,would you still say--and they actually have it for road use and vehicles,but that can't meet our standard. So how would that be approached by your department? MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Well,I would advise staff that they have a 30-foot easement,and I wouldn't be looking at the widths myself. That would be up to staff to say that's insufficient or to the applicant to request a deviation that's going to get down that low,but that will be a Board decision. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Then the second--go ahead. MS.CILEK: Real quick. Thank you,Heidi,for mentioning that. Yes, staff did contemplate that the deviation process may be utilized for transportation. But a thing to consider was that it would be required that the applicant identify all the deviations either at this zone(sic), if they know of them,or at the NIM. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's right. It is at the NIM. Thank you. Then the second item I want to make sure we somehow think about,some of these golf courses are not contiguous,and they're little pieces. We ran into this about a year ago on one of them that came through, and it just dawned on all of us in the pre-ap that,wait a minute,you can't do a PUD.They don't connect. To do straight zoning on five different pieces might be real awkward. So how--and we would--if this were to happen,the best thing to creativity--creative-wise proceed would be for the public's benefit and for this board and the Board of County Commissioners is to consider this as a PUD use. That way we can, you know,be creative on how it's protected in the neighborhood. But we can't get there the way it is now. So I know you were going to look into that and try to figure out a solution for it. What have you come up with? MS.CILEK: Well,I would be happy to work with the County Attorney's Office to see if we can include a provision within 5.05.15 to allow for PUDs to be multi parcels and go through the process. Due to advertising requirements,we weren't able to advertise that section of the code,which is in Chapter 4,to ensure consistency with both sections. We could--I can work with the County Attorney's Office and figure out what's the best path for it to address that,but we're not going to be able to do Chapter 4 by the 30th,which is just in a week and a half away. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Well,maybe we can just figure out a way it can be addressed then. MS.CILEK: Sure. We will follow up on that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else have anything on that? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Okay. Anything else,Caroline? MS.CILEK: I just wanted to go through H real quick,which is the lighting. So we put together a bit of information about the international Dark Sky and Dark Skies concepts in your packet. Hopefully,you were able to take a look at that. And from that research,we were able to provide you language in H. We did change it a bit. And at the end of the day,you know, lighting,depending on the type of use,can be really specific. So we really do want it to go through the process to figure out what is best for compatibility with some overarching goals of making sure that there's reduction of glare and sky glow. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Catches the finers points of it. Okay. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: I have a quick question just for clarification. MS.CILEK: Sure. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: So H,Line 35,34,excessive glare,I get that. Light trespass and sky glow. Help me understand the light trespass part of that. MS.CILEK: Yes. So light trespass is when your light that's on your property continues over into Page 35 of 46 January 19, 2017 the other person's property. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Okay. MS.CILEK: So we,as the Planning Commission knows,have gone through several PUDs where they are addressing this issue,and they do it by a distance requirement or by having a shielded light source. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Caroline,I think that takes us just about to the last page,then,doesn't it? MS.CILEK: Sure. On Page 40 I'll just mention,all of 10.03.06 is new,but it's all just implementing the standards in the section. I'll be happy to answer any questions. We tried to make no changes; simply share what needed to happen from the notice perspective. And this information will also be in the administrative code sections as well. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Great. Thank you. Mike? Oh,before we go to public speakers,is there any questions from the Planning Commission of staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Mike? We're going to start out with the registered public speakers, then if anybody else is not registered and you'd still like to speak,we're here to listen to you, so... MR.BOSI: Chair,there's two registered speakers. Mr.Edward Tappen and Diane Rupnow. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mr.Tappen,now you're up. MR.TAPPEN: Tappen. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Tappen,thank you. MR.TAPPEN: Thank you. My name is Edward Tappen,T-a-p-p-e-n. For the last year,I have been an advocate for having Collier County establish common municipal golf courses. Collier now has none. I believe that I am a common person that is one who lacks the characteristics of having power;therefore,I have written letters,asked for advice from others,attended county meetings,and written to people in power positions and collected a great deal of information. I love golfing. Like millions of average and/or common people across the world,I would rather be golfing today,any day. Many common people in Collier County,including visitors,cannot afford to play golf in Collier County.Imagine that. In fact,joining a country club is out of the question for most common people like me. I am a single golfer who has paid$900 more annual fees than the player I played next to and who joined as a couple in one of the smallest clubs in Naples. In April of 2015,I began--after being taken advantage of,it came to an end last year, so I resigned that small country club September 2015.Many country clubs charge more for single inequity members than each golfer who joined as a couple;however,Lakewood seemed to be a higher percentage,and my appeal to the directors or owners was denied. In April 2016,Lakewood Country Club news told members Lakewood club--golf club is definitely not for sale,is not to be sold. Because Lakewood Country Club is owned by approximately 66 equity members and found that they had financial problems,they voted to sell the club. A recent letter to the editor said it is now listed for sale at 2.9 million. Before the 66 members voted to start negotiations for sale,they were told it probably would be worth two or two-and-a-half million and that as of this time,our lawyer states that--this is a quote;our lawyer states that any remaining funds available,(sic)all commitments are met,will be equally shared among these 66 equal members. The current loan balance is approximately$170,000. Actually,the county market value is much less than 2.9 million. Even when Lakewood is having financial problems,the board of directors has not increased their annual fees for more than five years. Their management of the club and getting members to vote seem questionable when they voted yes. I believe that the county could negotiate to save golf land without rezoning. That's my appeal to this board,this commission. I have collected a lot of information during the past years,this past year,and will gladly share it to Page 36 of 46 January 19,2017 the Planning Commissioner--Commission,you. I have collected--letting greedy people profit and changing natural land would be a shame. The Planning Commission should at least offer to negotiate with owners and find out the facts,then provide commissioners a plan to save the natural lands. In addition,when and if the county owned the land,it could hire professional managers and often--and offer good workers that are maintaining the courses at this time. The workers at,for instance, Lakewood have been exceptional and,under management of professionals,could do wonders. The county might even get an award from the Audubon intentional program and be designated as a certified Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary. See the paper from yesterday or the day before. I think it was yesterday. Another municipality provided--other municipalities have provided funds to have golf courses since 1899. Why not Collier? Bob Cooling who lived at Lakewood and was on the founding equity--one of the founding equity members said when he heard about Lakewood being put up for sale,the club--he said--and this was recorded in the minutes--the club needs a financial expert. The answer in the minutes of that meeting were,this has been investigated. Mr. Cooling passed away in June 2016. That concludes what I have to say. I have copies of this to share with whoever. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,there's a couple things you probably could benefit from being aware of The request to change the language in the code to do what we're being asked to do today would assist in getting--accomplish maybe what you're asking for. You want the county to consider purchasing a public golf course,whether it's Lakewood or one other. One of the steps that are required here,as these courses come up for conversion,the county would be considering those.It doesn't mean they're going to buy them, but that option would be on the table. The documents that you have would be better held until that process starts. This is just the process to get to where you want to go. If this gets approved,when they convert that golf course,one of the steps they have to do is offer it to the county,they have to offer it to the homeowners association, if they're interested, and then the general public or whoever else they want to offer it to at that point. So some of the issues you're asking for could be attained once this language is adopted,and that's what this meeting today is about is getting that far. So it's the first step,and it may actually help what you're trying to do. MR.TAPPEN: I understand,but as a common person trying to figure out why they are--I'm sure that money buys what people want. And what I'm saying is that if the rezoning goes on to a--to have people sell their golf course,then the land is gone. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We don't disagree,but these steps will help the county at least consider that golf course for a purchase. That's--so that goal is somewhat in line with what you're talking about.We just need to get this language going first,and then that will happen. Other than that,this board doesn't make any decisions on purchases by the county. That's made by the county commissioners.But I think this would help that process get started,so... MR.TAPPEN: Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you,and for your patience in waiting today. I appreciate this. Mike,next speaker? MR.BOSI: The next speaker,and it's the last official speaker slip,is Diane Rupnow. MS.RUPNOW: Thank you. I've read the draft,and I'm pleased that stakeholders will have an opportunity for input in this process. I think that's a very important feature. If the intent of this amendment is to identify and facilitate the process of converting preexisting golf courses into non-golf course use,why isn't that language in the document,is my question. What would be wrong with including a statement that this conversion amendment applies only to preexisting golf courses that were in business prior to the April 12th,2016,moratorium and not just to a golf course that's in the permit process? That's my only question. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I'm not sure--well,when we get done with public speakers,I'll ask staff to address your question,okay? MS.RUPNOW: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Do we have any other registered public speakers? Page 37 of 46 January 19, 2017 MR.BOSI: None. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Is there any member of the public who has not spoken that would like to speak on this matter today? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Caroline,you heard the lady's question. I'd like to make sure we get it clarified. If you're not clear on the question,we can have it asked again. It was a little fuzzy,but did you understand where she was going? MS. CILEK: Well,I think we can say that moratoriums,basically,do not allow people to come forward with new pre-application meeting requests and to submit rezones and the like. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Or golf courses. MS.CILEK: Or golf course conversions,period. So it would have applied to any golf course that existed as of,you know,April 12,2016,date. COMMISSIONER EBERT: So a working golf course as of April,okay. MS.CILEK: Yeah. Any of those that were previously approved or under the moratorium or if they were seeking to convert. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. And that moratorium is up in--April 11th,right? MS.ASHTON-CICKO: The language that you are considering is golf courses that are constructed. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Already in use? MS.ASHTON-CICKO: That's the applicability. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Constructed. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: If it's built it doesn't-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: If a development has built a golf course,then that golf course would fall under this new language. MS.CILEK: Right. That's the second part of the concept,I would think. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. And I hope that answers-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: The amendment--to clarify the question,the amendment covers all aspects,whether conversion or retention under some other type of management,meaning the county could take it over or somebody else. I mean,this is not an amendment strictly just to redevelop a golf course. It's also an amendment to allow other options for retention in other uses. MS.CILEK: Sure,yes. Through the process. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I think that was your question,was it not? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You'll have to come up and use the mike again. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You'll have to come up. MS.RUPNOW: I get confused by all this technical language. All I want to know is does this conversion apply to golf courses that were in business,and it was my understanding that there are quite a few golf courses that maybe haven't been making a profit and,therefore,they want to convert their golf course to some other use. So is this conversion process going to apply to just golf courses that were in business before this moratorium? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It will apply to all golf courses. All golf courses. So whether they're in business or not. We have declining golf courses that are no longer in business. It applies to them as well; every golf course. MS.RUPNOW: I'm talking--I'm referring to specific land that is adjacent to the subdivision in which I live that is permitted to build a golf course,but those of us who live next to this land--and it's being cleared under the guise of building a golf course,but we have reason to believe that's not the true intention of the developer. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: The words are constructed. So the course would have to have some kind of permitting for the golf course or something,I would imagine. MR.KLATZKOW: I don't think that's what she's saying. What you're telling me is that you're concerned that somebody said they're building a golf course but they're really not going to be doing that? MS. RUPNOW: Right. MR.KLATZKOW: So the golf course has not been constructed. Page 38 of 46 January 19, 2017 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. MS.RUPNOW: No. The land is being cleared,but the golf course has not been constructed. MR.KLATZKOW: The question is, if you're zoned for a golf course but you haven't constructed it, are you still part of the moratorium? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Oh,I don't know about the moratorium. You're not part of the conversion process because you wouldn't have triggered it because you're not constructed. So that's what it means. MS.RUPNOW: Okay. So thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And a PUD may have--it's the language-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're experienced with that,aren't we? We have a lot of golf courses. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: A PUD may have in its language to allow for the golf course to be constructed but it--there's always--if they haven't constructed it yet,there's always the option to come in and do a re-plat and eliminate the golf course issues. MS.RUPNOW: I understand that. I understand that. Thank you. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Which takes a public hearing and all the neighbors are notified and everybody-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No,not if it's internal to the PUD. They made--if it's a PUD that has never really laid out a golf course and designed it,there's nothing to say that they have to build that golf course. COMMISSIONER CIIRZANOWSKI: I've never seen a PUD that doesn't have some kind of wording in it that says we're going to build--to get the PUD,you have to say I'm going to build a golf course or something. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We've had PUDs clearly approved that have now since evolved and decided not to build a golf course. Isles of Collier was approved with a golf course intent,and then when it came in for initial plat and final plat,it does not have a golf course. Naples Reserve is another one. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Naples Reserve,that's the one I was thinking of,but they changed that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah,that's the exception,not the norm,but there are cases like that. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. There are no other speakers. Anything--any members of the commission have any questions of anybody at this point? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Caroline,I appreciate it. I think we're done with the golf course one. And I want to ask this panel what they'd like to do. I think we can finish this up rather quickly. We only have the preservation standards left. So I'd rather suggest we not take a lunch break and just finish right up,or if we get here past--if we're not close to being done by 12:15 or 12:30,we'll take a short break. But I'd like to work through lunch if that's okay. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Third. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Caroline,that concludes the discussion on the golf course language. It's going to come back again for a final discussion on the 30th at 5:05 in the evening; it's anticipated to be final. So that will be at the point where we would leave the language in place,we'd recommend it to the Board of County Commissioners to proceed in their manner. So hopefully we'll be done with it by then. So okay. I can't take questions from the audience, sir. Now we're going to move on to the-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You can ask staff. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. You can ask staff members,if you'd like,Mike or somebody else. We can move on to the next item on the agenda which is the preservation standards that were presented to us as part of this. MS.CILEK: Let me pull up the amendment. Page 39 of 46 January 19, 2017 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: By the way,Caroline,that was good information on Dark Skies. MS.CILEK: Oh,thank you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Good read. Thank you. The contrast between the way the light poles are unshielded and shielded makes that understandable why we try to make sure they're all shielded,so that's a good move. MS.CILEK: Images are helpful. It's exciting what the county's embarking on with regards to lighting standards. Okay. The preservation standards amendment starts on Page 8. And I'll just do a little recap for you. This amendment was brought before you last year following board direction to look at the endowment payment amount for Conversation Collier lands both for the monetary option and then also for the land donation option. So this should be somewhat familiar. We were working with you-all,and you provided the recommendation that,more or less,you wanted to promote on-site preservation rather than offsite preserves. So we went back to DSAC and CCLAC and worked with their subcommittees to put together numbers that would promote on-site retention of preserve lands. So I have staff here with me to help answer any questions. The narrative should be very similar to prior amendment--prior amendment regarding the endowments;however,we did work with DSAC,and they actually suggested that we take a look at the initial section to the offsite,which is the applicability,and work through that and really kind of tweak it to meet the original intent. My experience with working with Summer has been that she has to reiterate the idea behind what is supposed to go offsite when that is being asked,how much land should be able to go offsite. And so the initial LDC amendment is addressing that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. How do you want to walk through it just as far as our review through the narrative? MS.CILEK: Sure. You want to go through the narrative or LDC section text language? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Let's see if there's any questions on the narrative first,then we'll move into the text after that. MS. CILEK: Perfect. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: In the narrative section does anybody have any questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No. Good. We'll move right directly into the text. MS.CILEK: All right. So what I was just discussing was with regards to H.1.F.I,applicability. So here we're really guiding what should be allowed to go offsite and took a look at the different criteria that one would have to meet to be able to go offsite and really geared it towards small preserves,small aggravated (sic)language. Yeah,small preserves. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's one acre or less. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: One acre or less,yeah. MS. CILEK: And then there's specific provision for PUDs. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Under the applicability where it says existing,are we that far yet? MS.CILEK: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yes,H. It would be Line 36 and 39. Existing portion of preserves located within single-family platted lots. If they're existing,why are we even wanting to convert them?I mean, what's the basis behind this? What's the reasoning behind it? MS.CILEK: Sure. One is that this is an existing provision already in the code,so we didn't want to remove it,and that my understanding is that there are several residential subdivisions that were approved many moons ago that allowed for and,you know, identified the preserve on the single-family platted lots; however, staff feels that there's a small amount of preserve there and that they no longer need to retain it. It doesn't benefit the single-family homeowner or the preserve. It's hard to maintain it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Mike,you're familiar--and it was before Caroline's time--Twin Eagles. Do you remember what they did? They took their lots and tried to find a way around the rules at the time,I believe,and included within the lots their longer and deeper sections of the golf course,and I believe even Page 40 of 46 January 19, 2017 preserves. How would they be affected by language like this? Because they did that to circumvent,I believe,their requirements at the time and still retain what they were supposed to. They did it in a different way. I'm not saying it was bad or good. But I don't want--I want to make sure that if that was a requirement to get to where they got,they couldn't come in and re-plat and do away with some of this. MS.CILEK: And I could have Summer speak on this as well. She's is here. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. The easiest way to get to the answer is all I'm looking for. COMMISSIONER EBERT: It wasn't only Twin Eagles. Da Vinci and Olde Cypress also did the same thing. They never put in preserves, so the county made them put 20 feet on each property. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're just going to take away your backyard. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Well,it wasn't mine.It's a different division in there. I live on the preserve,so... CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Summer? MS.ARAQUE: Summer Araque,Principal Environmental Specialist,for the record. So this is existing language,and I think we were trying to clean it up. I think your points are very valid. They would still need to meet the minimum requirement. So Audubon Country Club is actually a good example. That's a PUD. And they're somewhere in the 50 to 60 percent range on their preserve provided. So they're well above their 25 percent minimum. But there are certain lots in there that have strips on the back,and that's an example of one where this could come into play. But I think the examples that you all have brought up are good examples to see how this would apply to those. So if we think about Twin Eagles,they would still have to maintain their minimum requirement-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Overall. MS.ARAQUE: --overall. But we could kind of think through how this particular section would affect those projects that you just mentioned to make sure that we're not creating a loophole. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And it's coming back on the 30th, so between now and then, if there's an issue there,please just flesh it out and see what we need to do with it. MS. CILEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Down under D.1,essential service facilities other than parks--this is from your exceptions--I would like to suggest we need to say essential service facility,governmental facilities. And I know that's existing language,but there's a reason for that. We've got a lot of things out there that aren't governmental that are considered now essential service,and that's changing over time, so there's no reason we shouldn't be trying to keep up with it with the code. MS.CILEK: Sure. We can make that change,and I'll take a look at the definition as well. And,actually,I was looking at the wrong section. I did want to mention that the intent that we're adding is under H.1.F,and there on Line 11, 12, 13,we are identifying that these can go offsite because they are small and isolated and less than an acre. I didn't read the full sentence. I was looking in the wrong area. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. The next couple of pages,anybody have any questions? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: No. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Are you on Page 19 yet? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We could be; sure. What would you like? MS.ASHTON-CICKO: I have a requested deletion of the double--or the triple I on Page 19, starting at Line 3,because that's already covered under 9.03.07 of your LDC. So I would request deletion of that entire paragraph. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Where did you say,Heidi? MS.ASHTON-CICKO: It's on Page 19 starting at Line 3,and it's the whole paragraph under triple I. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Okay. MS.CILEK: Thank you for letting me know that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I don't have any other issues till Page 21. Anybody else? (No response.) Page 41 of 46 January 19, 2017 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Page 21 refers to a post-development value. I really think that's kind of unfair. And you and I have talked about this,so I would suggest predevelopment. MS.CILEK: Okay. So-- CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And we establish at what time frame in predevelopment that would be. MS.CILEK: Okay. One thing to recognize is that there are two different recommendations going on here;one is from DSAC,and the other is from CCLAC. I just want to bring that to your attention. They are different. So the DSAC recommendation is on page--starts on Page 19,and then the exact same language but with different recommendations for how to address monetary payment in the land donation for CCLAC is on Page 21. And we do have one thing we want to bring to your attention with regards to the CCLAC one. And I'm happy to revisit how the numbers were derived from DSAC, if that would be helpful at all. A little bit of that history goes back to the other amendment, so just let me know. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And I--you know,what this is going to boil down to are the DSAC's recommendations,the Conservation Collier's recommendations,and then what we suggest as either one or the other or a compromise. And I was wondering,between now and the 30th,could staff lay this--I know you've got a table in here,but we ought to lay this out and figure out a way to simply understand it,because putting it in the text of the LDC and then trying to analyze it there just doesn't cut it very easily. MS.CILEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So I think it's going to boil down to numbers at this point: How we measure numbers,when we measure the numbers,and what those numbers are. MS.CILEK: Okay. We can put in the next packet the numbers of how each of these subcommittees arrived at the numbers. They start with the same one,but then how they look at it over a 20-year period is different. And we can try to just streamline it a little bit based on what staff recommends as well. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You know what you did in the architectural standards,when you had that--and Jeremy did that colorful table and he said,here's the standard,here's the standard,and here's the options or something--I forget how he worded it--that was a perfect side-by-side comparison to explain how the language works out in reality based on the calculations. I would think it would help us get our arms around it. MS.CILEK: Okay. We can do that. Looking at the recommendations for the monetary payment for CCLAC,though,you did have a suggestion regarding a different appraisal option than what is here. Do you want to repeat that for me,please. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You're suggesting under CCLAC,a monitor payment shall be based on the amount of post-development appraisal value. So that means the developer goes in,goes through the risk of getting all the entitlements,and they're rewarded by saying,now,that's the value you're going to have to use to do the preserve offsite when you start planning your project. I think that's a penalty,not an incentive.And I would suggest we look at predevelopment within a year's time of when the first DO is actually constructed--first construction tacked a DO on the site. For example,we have people in town who have owned property here for decades and decades and decades,so it can't go on the time when they brought the property 40 years ago but certainly within a year, say,prior to the development period that they're moving forward with in which they're requesting the preservation;that entitlement period would be better than saying after you've gone through the risk of getting your entitlements, now we're going to penalize you for it by using that number. I just don't think that's the fair way to go. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Mark,I agree. MS.CILEK: Another thing to consider for this option would be just a set fee based on, like,the average cost of land in the urban area or the rural land grant,because they are different. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Right. And that--and you and I talked about that. That is going to have to be,though,tied to a nexus that's rationale. And one of the items we may want to look at in this analysis, sort of this table that would be a little simpler way to approach it, is look at the AUIR.And we have regional and community parks. We know what we pay in the rural area,and we know what we pay in the urban area. We ought to look at two standards for there. So if you've got a project in the rural area,your standard for contribution,if you want to just use--instead of looking at the appraisal route,this could be it. Urban Page 42 of 46 January 19,2017 area would be a little different,obviously. So I would suggest if we're going to tie it to a fixed fee,it's tied to a fee that we've established as valid,and we do that through the AUIR. MS.CILEK: Sure. Yeah, staff would be happy to prepare those numbers for you. Another thing to consider is that based on my work with Alex in looking at those numbers, it's very--for the urban one, it's very similar--the AUIR number is very similar to what her experience has been in purchasing that land. So we have evidence that that is even a more valid number based on top of how they get to that just from the AUIR process alone. So we can support that. It would simplify this process a bit.Appraisals can be a lot of extra work. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It would,and maybe that's why we should look at this option as another option. I'm more concerned about validating the value instead of just coming up with an arbitrary staff value saying,well,let's use 250,000 or 200,000. I'd rather see a valid--I mean,we go through a lot of effort in the AUIR to try to justify those numbers. MS.CILEK: And we can put that in the table for you. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Those are a couple items that will give us some-- MS.CILEK: And then another recommendation just from a staff perspective--and I have chatted with Alex about this--is that in this 4.A,after the post-development appraisal value is discussed,we talk about a 125 percent would be the endowment amount for the monetary amount. It would be really great for the LDC if we could streamline it and just put one number forward for endowment for both the monetary and the land donation so that they're the same,and everybody knows what the endowment amount would be. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: So instead of 125 percent,use a set value? MS.CILEK: Yes. And we could use the one that we can discuss in the land donation. That's what DSAC did. They proposed one standard endowment amount,and that way everyone would know.They're different. DSAC and CCLAC have different ones,but DSAC did propose one number so that it's easy to understand what you have to provide as the endowment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I have no--I think that would be a good way to start. MS.CILEK: Super. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: At least we'll look at it.I'm not sure what will fly,but we'll have numbers to look at. MS.CILEK: Yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Then--Patrick,you look like you've got a question. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Like you said,we'll look at it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Yeah. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. The endowment is a little tricky because,generally,you know,if you've got to pay for maintenance and exotic removal,not all parcels have the same amount of exotic infestation. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: That's a challenge. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: To say everybody has to pay the same when you may have better environmental land,more refined environmental land,more value to it because it has exotics,we're almost penalizing them with the endowment, so... MS.CILEK: And we have numbers to support how the number for the endowment was derived,and the number per acre per year is the same for DSAC and CCLAC. It's just after five years they made different assumptions,and so we can show those to you in a table. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: You're saying after five years-- MS.CILEK: I'm saying after five years DSAC looks at the amount that is needed to manage land differently than CCLAC does. CCLAC uses the same number throughout every year,and DSAC looks at it differently. So we'll be happy to provide the numbers to you so you can look at them. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Generally what happens,when you go in to clear initially for exotics,you get the Brazilian pepper that's 20 feet high. It's a pain. Plus, sometimes it's mechanical,sometimes it's stump-and-squirt operation. Page 43 of 46 January 19, 2017 What DSAC's saying is that after you do that,the continued maintenance has leveled off. I think the experience that Conservation Collier's trying to say is it's not leveled off as much as you think. So that's what we need to address. MS.CILEK: And we can provide you the numbers that Conservation Collier has experienced on a large parcel,maintaining that for several years,and that may help you understand what number to go with. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: And you know who probably has some information they could gather on this is a guy named Joe Schmitt. There was initial--there was some really intensive heavy acreage done on a project he and I worked on that had a lot of exotics and had to go in be done both mechanically and by hand. And I am no longer there,so I'm not sure how the maintenance of that is going with the CDD that took over. But that would be interesting to see how their numbers look,Joe. I mean,it was probably before you got the CDD. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. That was all before I got there. But,I mean,that information's available. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't know if they're experiencing that much of a high intensity invasion. I know when it got done it was gorgeous.It just came out really well. It's just a matter of did it come back and what's it taking to keep it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We have other--I'm sure that is available from other environmental consultants,Tim Hall and others that do work right now. If we can--they could give you that average cost. MS.CILEK: And they work together to figure out the first costs. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Good. MS.CILEK: It's just the DSAC,with Tim Hall,looked at--or a different individual,sorry,not that individual. They looked at it,and after five years they made a different assumption. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Fiddler's Creek was a tremendous cost to--that preserve across from the spreader canal which was cleared,but it's been very successful over the years once they went in and treated it and no reinfestation. So that cost has been cut significantly. But the initial cost is heavy. MS. CILEK: Also,I'll say,when we provide the materials to you--which I'd like to go over the date in just a couple minutes--feel free to give us a call if you have any questions on them so we can help explain them so that you understand while you're reviewing them and ahead of the meeting. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Sounds good. MS. CILEK: One more thing, if I may.Actually a couple more. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Sure. MS. CILEK: But under Page 22,for CCLAC we have the$50,000 endowment. That was actually a staff oversight in guiding CCLAC. We really wanted to keep with the recommendation of the previous amendment,and so that would be a different number. It's a lesser number. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. MS.CILEK: So we'll provide that in the table for you to see,but that will be a change from that amendment. Okay. I thought I would also ask if there's anything that the Planning Commission wanted to recommend with regards to who the land is donated to. Currently it discusses,I believe,a government entity, and I wanted to make sure that was still what the Planning Commission believes should happen. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,I--I guess it depends on how you define government entity,because I've understood there's been some attempt to have CDDs be able to be the entity that it's donated to. I would highly recommend that not happen. CDDs are stable in some regards until there's a recession. When there's a recession,they're no long stable. We've experienced that. We've had some CDDs across the state go out of business. I'm not sure that's the best way to assure long-term maintenance if they're no longer an operation. So we may want to just leave it governmental,and it just stays that way as long as governmental is not considered CDDs. MS.CILEK: Okay. I'll work with the County Attorney's Office if clarification is needed to identify what governmental entity includes. MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Yeah. CDD is considered a governmental entity. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah,it is. Page 44 of 46 January 19, 2017 MS.ASHTON-CICKO: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Who owns the areas like the Nancy Payton Preserve? CHAIRMAN STRAIN: That's Collier County,I think. That would be under Conservation Collier. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's Conservation Collier,okay. All right. That's what I'm thinking of,where you would want to add to those larger swaths of land rather than--where there's some benefit. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: There was a project that came through that wanted--that had to do some offsite mitigation,and it was a CDD project. They said,you know,instead of donating the offsite to government entity,they're just going to donate it to themselves. That's where the twist came in.That's why the question's come up,the first time it was attempted,and we're not sure if it's the right thing to do in regards to longevity and assurance that the property will always be perpetually maintained. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So there's no option to go into a panther preserve and buy PHUs in an approved--government approved privately-run preserve,land bank or something else like that? MS.CILEK: Sure. I'm not--I don't know,actually,but I think with this language--and it's--I will tell you what page it's on,and I was mistaken. It's not governmental entity. It's governmental agency. It's on Page 20,Line 18. I can have Alex speak on the panther preserve,but I think it comes down to, like,a general-purpose government agency or a specific governmental,and panther-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: U.S.Fish and Wildlife is always attempting to buy land to mass sufficient quantities of property for panther preserve,but-- MS. CILEK: That might be considered-- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: --I'm not sure if it's really U.S.Fish and Wildlife or it's privately approved. I mean,it's like a land bank for wetland mitigation. Those are typically privately run. They're approved through federal agencies and permitted,but they are typically private run. What's the one up in Lee County,panther--panther mitigation bank. MS.CILEK: Right. I can take a look at that.And this was a question asked. I didn't do a bunch of research beforehand,but we can do that before we come back. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Anybody else? MS.CILEK: Let me ask staff if I need to discuss anything else. Okay. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: No? Yes? Caroline? MS.CILEK: I believe that's it for this amendment. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Are there registered public speakers,Mike? MR. BOSI: None. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Are there any members of the public here who would like to speak on this item? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Okay. Then we know that these two are coming back on the 30th at an evening meeting,which we'll--that's an opportunity for the public to talk again on these. And with that,I don't think,Caroline,there's anything else we have on your item,right? MS. CILEK: Just a note. Just due to the short time frame of the 30th,we were wondering if we could provide you your packets on Wednesday the 25th. So they would be on that Thursday morning. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: It's all going to be stuff we have already reviewed once,twice,or more. MS.CILEK: Yes,yes. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: You guys okay with that? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: That's fine. MS.CILEK: Less time,but still a weekend. Staff just has a really short turnaround time to prepare the packets for you this time. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We've got three people now electronically doing this. Stan's electronic now.Joe. We are getting there. MS. CILEK: Thank you. I'm good. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Thank you. Is there any new business? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's a pretty neat trick,though. A PUD donated to itself Page 45 of 46 January 19, 2017 CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Well,that's why the question came up,Joe. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We have to preserve anyway,but we're going to donate it. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: I don't think anybody thought about it before. All of a sudden it pops up and they go,whoa,wait a minute. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. That doesn't sound right. Good catch. Anyways,I was just thinking about that. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Yeah. It took a minute when I first heard it,too. I was like,wait a minute, how do you do that? So we've got no new business listed. There is no old business listed. Any members of the public here that would like to comment? (No response.) CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Hearing none,is there a motion to adjourn by Patrick? COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Motion to adjourn. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Motion. Second by Stan. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Second. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Seconded. All in favor, signify by saying aye. COMMISSIONER CHRZANOWSKI: Aye. COMMISSIONER EBERT: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER DEARBORN: Aye. CHAIRMAN STRAIN: We're out of here. Thank you,all. There being no further business for the good of the County,the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 12:14 p.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MARK STRAIN,CHAIRMAN ATTEST DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK These minutes approved by the Board on , as presented or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF U.S.LEGAL SUPPORT,INC., BY TERRI LEWIS,COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. Page 46 of 46 Agenda Item 9.A COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT ti PL2O1IOGO2167 I,m+ oaIee RD PROJECT .O LOCATION CO 1=75 D °'} Vanderbilt Beach RD Golden Gate BLVD W .. IPlnellidge RD ,�l 2015 CYCLE GMP AMENDMENT (TRANSMITTAL HEARING) Project/Petition#PL20150002167/Petition: CP-2015-2 CCPC: FEBRUARY 16, 2017 BCC: MARCH 28, 2017 Clerk's Office TABLE OF CONTENTS CCPC — 2015 CYCLE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TRANSMITTAL HEARING PL20150002167/CP-2015-2 CCPC February 16, 2016 1) TAB: Transmittal Staff Report DOCUMENT: CCPC Staff Report: PL20150002167/CP-2015-2 2) TAB: NIM Meeting DOCUMENT: Neighborhood Information Meeting and backup materials: P L20150002167/C P-2015-2 3) TAB: Transmittal Resolution DOCUMENT: Transmittal Resolution with Exhibit "A" text (and/or maps): PL20150002167/CP-2015-2 4) TAB: Legal Advertisement DOCUMENT: CCPC Transmittal Advertisement PL20150002167/CP-2015-2 5) TAB: Project Application DOCUMENT: Project PL20150002167/Petition CP- 2015-2 ***NOTE: See Separate packet containing: a) Petition w/signatures; and b) Letters of Objection Agenda Item 9. Go e-r Covt-�.ty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: February 16, 2017 SUBJECT: PETITION CP-2015-2 / PL20150002167, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] ELEMENT: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) APPLICANTS/OWNERS/AGENTS: Vanderbilt Commons, LLC — Ralph Cioffi, Manager c/o Welsh Companies of Florida, Inc. 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 Fred Hood, AICP Bruce Anderson, Esq. Davidson Engineering, Inc. Cheffy Passidomo, PA 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 821 5th Avenue South Naples, Florida 34104 Naples, Florida 34102 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property comprises approximately 14.49 acres (originally 15.88) and is located on w. ' ' ; the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR - , 862) approximately one-quarter mile west of = °4 • Collier Boulevard (CR 951), in Section 34, "4" _ — , 77 Township 48 South, Range 26 East. The _ , y subject property is a component of the larger, subje operty 47.94-acre (originally 49.33) parent Vanderbilt —~ - Ex ansionArea Beach / Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict, which encompasses two geographic areas; the easterly "existing area" (33.45 acres) and the westerly "expansion area" (originally 15.88 t Existingxrea t. acres). (Urban Estates Planning Community) REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner seeks to amend the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to revise the Vanderbilt Beach / Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict to: 1) add 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area of commercial land uses in the (originally) 15.88- acre expansion area, which is the site of the Carolina Village PUD (150,000 sq. ft. was requested as part of the 2003 GMP amendment to expand the Subdistrict but was not actually included in the Subdistrict text though the Carolina Village PUD is approved for that 150,000 sq. ft., plus an —1 — CP-2015-2/PL20150002167 Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9. additional 50,000 sq. ft.), resulting in a total of 400,000 square feet of commercial land uses in .� the entire Subdistrict; 2) remove a development restriction related to transportation impacts; and, 3) amend and re-order the text. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The amendment proposes to add a previously-requested 150,000 square feet (sq. ft.) allotment of commercial space per petition no. CP-2003-1, increase the maximum floor area from 150,000 sq. ft. to a maximum of 200,000 sq. ft., and remove a development restriction related to transportation commitments—now met. The net effect of this amendment is to allow an additional 50,000 sq. ft. of commercial development. [Note that, while this amendment recognizes and corrects the gross leaseable 150,000 sq. ft. figure, it does not recognize or include the (also) previously requested split in 2005 between 90,000 sq.ft. retail and 60,000 sq.ft. office uses. No allotment of commercial space differentiates retail space from office space in the current request.] STAFF ANALYSIS: SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: Existing Conditions: Subject Property: The (original) 15.88-acre "expansion area" subject property is zoned Carolina Village Mixed Use Planned Unit Development(MPUD). This acreage has since been reduced to 14.49 acres by the dedication in fee simple of small, adjacent land areas to Pristine Drive and Buckstone Drive. This PUD is approved for 150,000 sq. ft. of office and retail commercial uses, 64 residential units over commercial uses, and preserve area — and a portion is currently being developed with a self-storage facility. [Note that, while the Carolina Village MPUD provides for this 150,000 overall square footage maximum, it does not divide this total between 90,000 sq. ft. retail and 60,000 sq. ft. office uses as requested in CP-2003-1.] The 33.45-acre"existing area" portion of the parent Subdistrict is zoned Mission Hills PUD. This PUD is approved for 200,000 sq. ft. of commercial, financial, health and office uses, and preserve areas. Of the 200,000 sq. ft. approved, 121,817 sq. ft. have been developed — with two undeveloped outlots remaining. The current Future Land Use Map designation for these properties is the Urban Mixed Use District, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict. Surrounding Lands: North: A large portion of bounding lands to the north of the subject "expansion area" property are zoned Residential PUD (Wolf Creek, aka Black Bear Ridge), approved for a variety of residential uses (754 residential units), and preserve and open space. Of the 754 residential units approved, 162 single- family units and 118 multi-family units have been built. The area north of the"existing area"property is zoned MPUD(Sonoma Oaks),which allows for 120,000 sq. ft. of commercial and office uses, single- and multi-family residential uses (up to 114 residential units) or a senior housing facility (up to 456 units), and essential services (including a County well site and pump house), and preserve areas. This PUD is currently undeveloped. The current Future Land Use Map designation of these lands is Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. East: Land to the east of the subject"expansion area" property is zoned Mission Hills PUD. The Mission Hills property is reaching commercial (grocery store, automotive service centers, convenience store, eating establishment, commercial strip center, branch bank, etc.) buildout. The current Future Land Use Map designation is also Urban Mixed Use District, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict. This is the 33.45-acre "existing area" portion of the Subdistrict. —2— CP-2015-2/ PL20150002167 Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item 9.A South: A vast majority of the land to the south of the subject property, across Vanderbilt Beach Road, is zoned Estates and developed with estate residences. The Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map designates this estate residential area Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict. The Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict West: Land to the west of the subject property is zoned Residential PUD (Wolf Creek, aka Portofino Falls), approved for residential uses (754 residential units), and preserve and open space. Of the 754 residential units approved, 162 single-family units and 118 multi-family units have been built. The current Future Land Use Map designation of this land area is Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. In summary, the existing land uses in the area immediately surrounding the subject property are predominately urban residential in nature to the west and north; estates residential to the south; and, commercial to the east (within the "existing area" of the Subdistrict). A place of worship is located farther east, across Collier Blvd. Identification and Analysis of the Pertinent Requirements for Comprehensive Plans and Plan Amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., Specifically Sections 163.3177(6)(a) 2. and 8.: Considerations required for the adoption of a comprehensive plan amendment are listed below. 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. Agenda Item 9.A c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. It is incumbent upon the petitioner to provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan amendment, then present and defend, as necessary, that data and analysis. Application Exhibit "T", the Narrative & Justification of the Proposed GMP Amendment, addresses these requirements. BACKGROUND, CONSIDERATIONS AND ANALYSIS: Future Land Use and Zoning History: • 1998—The first PUD, the Golden Pond PUD, is designated for the 33.45-acre property at the northwest quadrant of the Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, to allow up to 75 multi-family dwelling units. This PUD would remain undeveloped. • 2001 — The GMP amendment is approved to establish the [subject] Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict, to allow up to 200,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses, financial institutions, business services, and professional and medical offices on the same 33.45-acre property. • 2003 — The next PUD, the Mission Hills PUD, replaces Golden Pond on the 33.45-acre property at the northwest quadrant of the Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, to allow 200,000 sq. ft. of general commercial uses. • 2005 — The GMP amendment is approved to expand the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict, which prohibits certain commercial uses considered incompatible with residential uses in the mixed-use setting. The adoption Ordinance for the Subdistrict, unintentionally omitted language for an additional amount of commercial floor area (150,000 sq. ft.), and its office— retail split (90,000 sq. ft./60,000 sq. ft.). • 2005—The Carolina Village MPUD is approved for the (original) 15.88-acre "expansion area" property at the northwest quadrant of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, to allow up to 150,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses and, up to 64 residential-over-commercial units. This MPUD does not include the gas stations, convenience stores with gas pumps, fast food restaurants with drive-through lanes, and tire stores prohibited by Subdistrict provisions. Also, this MPUD does not include a square feet limitation for office/retail use categories. The Subdistrict language proposed by this amendment is found in Exhibit "A", and proposes to: • Correct a text omission from the formal adoption document related to the amount of commercial space allowed within the (original) 15.88-acre expansion area. The (then) petitioner requested a maximum floor area of 150,000 sq. ft. split between 90,000 sq. ft. retail and 60,000 sq. ft. office uses. These figures did/do not appear in the adoption Ordinance or FLUE however. • Increase the maximum commercial floor area from 150,000 sq. ft. to 200,000 sq. ft. within the (original) 15.88-acre expansion area. The 200,000 sq. ft. will be allocated to air conditioned and mini- and self-storage warehousing, retail and office uses. • Dedicate up to 95,550 sq. ft. of commercial floor area to air conditioned and mini-and self- storage warehousing within the (original) 15.88-acre expansion area. An air conditioned and enclosed self-storage facility has been determined to be comparable in nature to other permitted commercial uses [HEX(Hearing Examiner) decision: 11/19/2015]. _ Agenda Item 9.A -- • Increase the commercial density for the entire Subdistrict from [the corrected] 350,000 sq. ft. on (originally) 49.33 acres to 400,000 sq. ft. on 47.94 acres (7,095 sq. ft./ac. to 8,343 sq. ft./ac.). • Remove a development restriction related to transportation impacts. Note that the application provides a number of support materials, including Exhibit "T", the Narrative & Justification of the Proposed GMP Amendment, which provides CCPC Minutes from the May 2004 consideration of the request to approve the 15-acre "expansion area", and original application materials and revised FLUE Subdistrict language for the 15-acre "expansion area". The public has also submitted materials, including a signed petition of opposition and individual letters of concern. These materials are included in the documents being provided to you along with this Staff Report. The PUD related to this GMPA is the "Carolina Village Mixed Use PUD." An amendment to this PUD will become a companion item for consideration at the adoption stage of this GMP amendment. Applicant's Justifications: (Refer to application Exhibit "T", the Narrative & Justification of the Proposed GMP Amendment) The justifications for the proposed amendments stated in the Introduction section of the exhibit [with staff assessments in italics]are: • The square footage figure to be corrected was originally requested but was not added to the original GMP text language; [Staff Assessment: Acknowledged, as a number of documents submitted by the petitioner—as discussed and evident in public record, including minutes from meetings when the Subdistrict was under initial consideration — support this statement. The square footage cap was clearly requested to appear in Subdistrict language as a maximum of 150,000 sq. ft., with 90,000 and 60,000 sq. ft. split between retail and office uses.] • The additional 50,000 sq. ft. is requested for currently-permitted commercial uses; [Staff Assessment:Acknowledged, as the residential and commercial uses are already allowed in this Subdistrict, either by its original 2005 approval or by a 2015 HEX decision.] The applicant's narrative and justifications generally support the proposed GMP amendments. Commercial Analysis Commercial Development: The intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard is anchored by the subject Subdistrict and the Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict (on the west side of Collier Boulevard). The subject property lies within approximately 2 miles south of the Immokalee Road — Collier Boulevard Mixed Use Activity Center (No. 3), and within approximately 2 miles north of the Collier Boulevard — Pine Ridge Road Neighborhood Center. The Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict lies within approximately 3 miles south of the subject property. Three of these locations provide opportunities for commercial development as follows: • The Commercial Western Estates Infill Subdistrict comprises±6.23 acres in the southwest quadrant of the Collier Boulevard — Vanderbilt Beach Road intersection, and is currently zoned for estate residential land uses. This Subdistrict has 41,490 undeveloped yet Agenda Item 9.A developable sq. ft. on approximately 3.93 acres available for low intensity office uses, — medical uses, and financial institutions permitted whether by right or by conditional use, in the C-1 (Commercial Professional and General Office) zoning district. Undevelopable open space comprises the balance of the ±6.23-acre area. (The two parcels comprising this Subdistrict were acquired by Collier County in 2004 and 2006, and no longer provide opportunities for commercial development.) • The Collier Boulevard – Pine Ridge Road Neighborhood Center Subdistrict comprises approximately 30 acres in the northwest and southwest quadrants of the Collier Boulevard – Pine Ridge Road intersection; is zoned (NW) for ±182,000 sq. ft. of C-3 (Commercial Intermediate) uses and developed with a gas station-convenience store and commercial strip center and, Brooks Village Commercial PUD (SW), that is 22.7 acres in area providing up to 105,000 sq., ft. of C-3 uses with a grocery store, commercial strip center, branch bank, and pharmacy-convenience store. This Subdistrict has approximately 49,643 undeveloped yet developable sq. ft. on approximately 5.41 acres (net) available for Neighborhood Center Uses. • The Collier Boulevard – Immokalee Road Mixed Use Activity Center comprises approximately 120 acres in of all four quadrants of the Collier Boulevard – lmmokalee Road intersection; is zoned for 541,000 sq. ft. of office and commercial uses, group/retirement housing facilities, essential services, hotels/motels, etc., as parts of Addie's Corner and Tree Farm MPUDs (NW) [fully undeveloped], Heritage Bay PUD (NE) [with an emergency-outpatient healthcare facility, pharmacy-convenience store, Cameron Corners commercial strip center] and, Richland PUD (SW) (aka Pebblebrook Lakes) [with eating establishments, pharmacy-convenience store, grocery store, animal hospital, branch banks, commercial strip center] and, agricultural uses (SE) [Pelican wholesale nursery]. This Activity Center has approximately one-half of its undeveloped yet developable sq. ft. remaining on ±80 acres (net) available for Activity Center Uses. Current PUD amendment applications pending approval for Addie's Corner and Tree Farm MPUDs may reduce this commercial floor area by±40,000 sq. ft. –leaving approximately 230,000 sq. ft. available for Activity Center Uses. • The Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill (GGECI) Subdistrict comprises ±10 acres in the northwest quadrant of the Collier Boulevard – Green Boulevard intersection, and is zoned for 83,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses in the Sungate Center Commercial PUD and partially developed [with a USPS facility]. This Subdistrict has approximately 68,874 undeveloped yet developable sq. ft. on ±6.50 acres (net) available for Commercial Infill Uses, which are low intensity commercial uses that are compatible with both residential and intermediate commercial uses, in order to provide for small scale shopping and personal needs, and intermediate commercial uses to provide for a wider variety of goods and services in areas that have a higher degree of automobile traffic–similar to C-1, C-2 (Commercial Convenience), or C-3 zoning districts. The above-listed sites are located within the Support Area described in the Alternative Site Analysis submitted with this petition, and currently provide a total of nearly 806,000 sq. ft. of commercial space – while more than 421,433 sq. ft. already approved for commercial development have yet to be developed. Just one of the four locations allow more than C-3 intensity, intermediate commercial uses. This one site, the lmmokalee Road – Collier Boulevard Mixed Use Activity Center, is either partially developed with only small parcels remaining (NE), agriculturally active (SE), fully developed commercially (SW) or, pending [re-]approval of mixed- use developments (NW) involving PUD and/or PDI changes that will allow up to 350 multi-family residential dwelling units and up to 75,000 sq. ft. of commercial development, or up to 135,000 sq. ft. of commercial development, and/or a retirement community/group housing, and/or a Agenda Item 9.A hotel/motel on a ±12.87 acre parcel; and, up to 281 multi-family residential dwelling units or 138 single-family residential dwelling units and up to 120,000 sq. ft. of commercial retail, and professional and medical office development on a ±18.69 acre parcel. If the proposed changes are approved for these two mixed-use PUDs located in the northwest quadrant of the Immokalee Road—Collier Boulevard intersection, the total amount of commercial space provided is closer to 766,000 sq. ft. —while the more than 348,517 sq. ft. that is approved for commercial development has yet to be developed. Sources: December 2015 Planned Unit Development(PUD) Master List (prepared and maintained by the Collier County Transportation Planning Section) and the Collier County Appraiser's Parcel and Building Footprint GIS databases. Generally, commercial development within a community can be categorized as strip commercial development, neighborhood commercial, community commercial, regional commercial, and so forth. Based on specific studies and/or demographic data for an area, such as population, income, household size, percentage of income spent on retail goods, etc., an analyst is able to estimate supportable commercial square feet for different commercial intensities for that geography by shopping center type. Petitioner's Market Demand Study: The firm of Davidson Engineering prepared an Alternative Site Analysis (Exhibit "N") dated October 2015, and revised through November 2016, as a "market study light" in support of the increased commercial square feet. This exhibit provides an evaluation of alternative sites within the site's "support area" that would function for the commercial uses found in this PUD. Comprehensive Planning staff utilized the Subdistrict's Support Area as described in the Alternative Site Analysis submitted with this petition and available County resources to conduct an evaluation of the CP-2015-2 proposal, with the following results: Market Study and Trade Area Analysis Section The Analysis studies a radial Support Area extending 3.5 miles from the subject property. Existing Local Population subsection Permanent population presently estimated in the Support Area is 38,304 (44,689 peak). Within the more-immediate, one-half mile area, the permanent population is estimated at 11,980 (13,977 peak). Proposed Population Growth subsection Year 2021 population in the Support Area is projected to be 44,002 (51,322 peak); while year 2026 population in the Support Area is projected to be 49,037 (57,187 peak). Existing Services subsection Ten (10) restaurants, coffee shops, and cafes are identified within 1.7 miles of the subject property; no others were reported within the 3.5 mile Support Area. Three (3) child care or pre-school facilities are identified within 2.3 miles of the subject property; no others were reported within the 3.5 mile Support Area. Thirteen (13) medical and general offices are identified within 1.8 miles of the subject property; no others were reported within the 3.5 mile Support Area. Seven (7) retail establishments are identified within 2.0 miles of the subject property; no others were reported within the 3.5 mile Support Area. Agenda Item 9.A Two (2) self-storage facilities are identified within 3.2 miles of the subject property; no others --- were reported within the 3.5 mile Support Area. Property Availability Section Alternative Site Analysis subsection Three key criteria for site development chosen by the petitioner are identified as those properties that are: 1) eligible for C-4 (General Commercial) zoning, 2) a minimum 10 acres in size, and 3) located with frontage on an arterial or collector roadway. These criteria were chosen to "provide an alternative site that will function for all proposed uses". Proposed Site Location subsection The subject property is a PUD providing commercial intensity ranging from C-3 to C-4, approximately 14.5 net developable acres, and frontage on Vanderbilt Beach Road — classified as a Minor Arterial roadway. Alternative Site Locations subsection The Alternative Site Analysis identified two alternative sites within the Support Area extending 3.5 miles from the subject property that meet all three (original] key criteria for site development; the ±17.26 acres (±12.87 net) acres in the Addie's Corner MPUD [allowing up to 135,000 sq. ft. of commercial retail and office development] and, the ±51.04 acres (±18.69 net) acres in the Tree Farm MPUD [allowing up to 175,000 sq. ft. of commercial retail and office development] located at the Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard intersection. Both locations pose limitations that make them less suitable, and are pending [re-]approval of their owners' proposed PUD and/or PDI changes to residential and commercial square feet in the mixed-use developments, making them unavailable. Conclusion The Alternative Site Analysis provided by the petitioner evaluated the commercial uses and the number of alternative sites meeting criteria for site development to conclude demand is evident for additional commercial development, of the type proposed with this amendment, within the subject property's support area. Staff Assessment: Comprehensive Planning staff utilized the Subdistrict's market area as described in the Alternative Site Analysis submitted with this petition and available County resources to conduct an assessment of the CP-2015-2 proposal, with the following results: Guidelines for Commercial Development utilize information about the different commercial centers in the County for this assessment and provide the figures for: • An 11-acre land area and a 110,734 sq. ft. building dimension for a Neighborhood Center (8.45 sq. ft. per capita), and • A 28-acre land area and a 257,668 sq. ft. building dimension for a Community Center(7.48 sq. ft. per capita). The above acreage and floor area figures are the average sizes of Neighborhood and Community Centers in existence (built) in Collier County. This means some Centers are larger, and some smaller, than these County-wide averages; that is, there is a range in size of each type of Center. Each type of Center is classified based upon size as well as uses. Demand in year 2016 for commercial development in the proposed Subdistrict's market area is calculated to be 334,274 (for Community Center commercial space), and 377,622 (for Agenda Item 9.A Neighborhood Center commercial space), while the County's PUD Master List reports more than 1,205,649 sq. ft. of existing and potential commercial space is available. This market area currently provides a surplus of 69% more than the 711,896 sq. ft. of commercial space needed to serve the estimated current [peak seasonal] population of 44,689. [Staff also found an inventory of 1,637,128 sq. ft. of existing and potential commercial space available employing Property Appraiser's GIS database figures. These figures are believed to be more accurate than the PUD Master List, and this current supply calculates to a surplus of 129% more than the commercial space needed.] The market demands of the population projected for the proposed Subdistrict's market area in year 2026 increase to 427,759 (for Community Center commercial space), and 483,230 (for Neighborhood Center commercial space), while the PUD Master List figure of more than 1,205,649 sq. ft. would still be developed or available—providing a surplus of 32% more than the 910,989 sq. ft. of the commercial space needed to serve the estimated year 2026 [peak seasonal] population of 57,187. [Again, staff utilized the figure of 1,637,128 sq. ft. of existing and potential commercial space available employing Property Appraiser's GIS database figures. These figures again, are believed to be more accurate than the PUD Master List, and this future supply calculates to a surplus of 79%more than the commercial space needed.] Note here how the figures derived above for the supply of commercial space appear far greater than demand will ever support. This amount of commercial supply is due to the full range of the types of commercial centers found in the market area— Neighborhood, Community and Regional centers. Regional centers are characteristically anchored by one or more full-line department stores, developed with or developable for 300,000 to 1,000,000 sq. ft. of the commercial space on 30, or 50 acres or more. One Regional commercial center is found inside the market area — the Malibu Lake Target plaza at 1-75 and Immokalee Road. One more Regional commercial center is found at the outer edge of the market area —the Donovan Center Walmart plaza in the southwest quadrant of 1-75 and lmmokalee Road. These two commercial centers provide for 330,000 sq. ft. and 250,000 sq. ft., respectively — which in an apples-to-oranges comparison, ostensibly reduces the commercial space figures by approximately 580,000 sq. ft. — leaving just the Neighborhood and Community centers to compare the subject property. Again employing Property Appraiser's GIS database figures, this calculation reveals a current surplus closer to 48% and a future surplus closer to 16% more than the commercial space needed. A surplus of 25% may not be unreasonable. As reported above, all but one of the other locations—along with the subject property itself—allow more than C-3 intensity, intermediate commercial uses. That one site, the lmmokalee Road — Collier Boulevard Mixed Use Activity Center, is either partially developed with only small parcels remaining, agriculturally active, fully developed commercially, or pending approval of proposed development. This assessment lends support to the proposition that a need is evident for a future land use change to introduce an additional amount of commercial land uses to this area, and that this location is appropriate to fulfill the need for providing convenient shopping, personal services and employment for neighboring and Golden Gate Estates residential areas, and ...to create a neighborhood focal point ...designed in a manner to be compatible with the existing and future residential and institutional development in this neighborhood. Appropriateness of the Site and the Change: The proposed amendment identifies climate-controlled self-storage as a commercial use that will _ share the overall amount of commercial floor area approved with office and retail uses. FLUE provisions primarily direct new commercial development into Mixed Use Activity Centers, and Agenda Item 9.A gives preference to commercial expansion adjacent to both Mixed Use Activity Centers and other -- commercial designations when additional demand can be demonstrated. This application increases commercial square feet within an existing commercially-designated site. Environmental Impacts: Collier County Development Review staff reviewed this petition and provided the following analysis: The majority of the property has been previously cleared and filled when the PUD was subdivided and subdivision improvements constructed, with a required 0.17 acre preserve located along the north property line adjacent to a platted common area and preserve within Wolf Creek PUD (Black Bear Ridge— Phase I subdivision). A letter from the Florida Master Site File (the State's official inventory of historical, cultural resources) lists no previously recorded cultural resources on the subject property. The project will be subject to the requirement of accidental discovery of archaeological or historical sites as required by Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) Policy 11.1.3. The provision is also included in Subsection 2.03.07 E of the LDC. Staff has identified that a portion of the identified Subdistrict is within wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone W-4 as defined in LDC Section 3.06.00. LDC Section 3.06.00 does not provide any prohibitions or restrictions for the land uses described in the proposed GMP amendment. The proposed GMP amendment will have no effect on the requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). [Stephen Lenberger, Senior Environmental Specialist --- Environmental Planning Section Development Review Division] Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Impact Analysis, Including Transportation Element Consistency Determination: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions submitted a Traffic Impact Statement (Exhibit "Q"), dated November 1, 2016. Collier County Transportation Planning personnel reviewed this petition and provided the following analysis: The 2004 AUIR reported the Airport Rd.-to-Collier Blvd. segment of Vanderbilt Beach Rd. as an existing deficiency and identified the project programmed to remedy it as "under construction". By the 2005 AUIR, construction to remedy the deficient nature of Vanderbilt Beach Rd. was underway, and no longer mapped as a deficiency. The 2016 AUIR does not indicate this segment of roadway as being deficient, so specific mitigating stipulations are no longer needed. No fewer than four "Capacity Enhancement Projects" in the surrounding area are identified in the AUIR. Plus, no projected deficiencies are present in the same area. The net new trips, while significant on Vanderbilt Beach Road, do not indicate that they would cause adverse impacts. The project is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element, and as such, no mitigation would be required within the project's area of significant impacts to accommodate the identified impacts on network capacity. The project's significant impacts are found only on the first link of Vanderbilt Beach Road. These significant impacts are expected from 183 Southbound trips (6.10% impact), and 104 Northbound Trips (3.47% impact). In this case, only the 104 northbound trips are of interest in reviewing the Agenda Item 9.A project for consistency with the Transportation Element, as this is the peak direction of the network. No other subsequent impacts are expected to exceed the 2% (or consequent 3%) threshold(s). [Michael Sawyer, Project Manager Transportation Planning Section] Public Facilities Impacts: No issues or concerns have been identified regarding impacts upon potable water, wastewater, solid waste, drainage, park and recreational facilities, schools, or EMS and fire protection services. • Potable Water System: The subject project will be served by Collier County potable water services and lies in the North County Water Service Area. The anticipated average daily demand for potable water for the project is 16,610 gallons per day (gpd) [74,745 gpd "Peak"]. Collier County has sufficient capacity to provide water services. • Wastewater Collection and Treatment System: The subject project will be served by Collier County wastewater collection and treatment services and lies in the North County Water Reclamation Service Area. The anticipated average daily demand for wastewater collection and treatment for the project is estimated at 16,610 gallons per day(gpd) [74,745 gpd "Peak"]. Collier County has sufficient capacity to provide wastewater services. • Solid Waste Collection and Disposal: The solid waste disposal service provider is Collier County Solid Waste Management. The 2015 AUIR identifies that the County has sufficient landfill capacity up to the year 2070 for the required lined cell capacity. • Stormwater Management System: The 2015 AUIR does not identify any stormwater management improvement projects in the vicinity of the subject property. Future development is expected to comply with the SFWMD and/or Collier County rules and regulations that assure controlled accommodation of stormwater events by both on-site and off-site improvements. • Park and Recreational Facilities: There will be no adverse impacts to park facilities from the proposed commercial development. • Schools: There will be no adverse impacts to public school facilities from the proposed commercial development. • EMS and Fire Protection: The subject property is located within the Golden Gate Fire and Rescue District. EMS services are provided by Collier County. The Golden Gate Fire and Rescue District Station 73 is located at 14575 Collier Boulevard. The proposed commercial development is anticipated to have no significant impacts on these safety services. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS: [Please note the following synopsis summarizes the formal Neighborhood Information Meeting that covered an earlier version of the proposed GMP amendment. Since that time, the application team considered the neighbors'concerns and submitted a revised proposal— as reflected in this current review and report. Portions of the NIM proceedings reflected below no longer apply] A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by LDC Section 10.03.05 F was [duly advertised, noticed and] held on Wednesday, September 7, 2016, 5:30 p.m. at the Vineyards Community Park — Meeting Room, located at 6231 Arbor Boulevard West. Approximately 49 people other than the application team and County staff attended — and heard the following information: Agenda Item 9.A The agent representing this application (Fred Hood, of Davidson Engineering) provided a full _ description of the proposed changes to the group, including how the two companion requests (Growth Management Plan amendment-GMPA/Planned Unit Development amendment-PUDA) mainly cover potential future uses allowed in the C-3, Commercial Intermediate and C-4, General Commercial zoning districts, including a use determined to be a comparable and compatible use — enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing. Please be reminded the NIM presentation and discussion covered the GMPA, the PUDA, [indirectly] a recent HEX determination, and a recently- approved Site Development Plan (SDP)for the self-storage facility in-combination simultaneously. Mr. Hood provided to attendees print handouts of a NIM outline, the PUD amendment application, conceptual development plans and copy of Naples Daily News article regarding the proposal. Mr. Hood explained the hearing process for the Transmittal phase of the GMP amendment request and how the first set of public hearings will not be concerning Planned Unit Development amendments. He reviewed an anticipated hearing schedule for these requests. The later Adoption phase of the GMP amendment request will also take the companion PUD amendment into consideration. Mr. Hood took [and addressed] questions and comments from those in attendance, covering topics such as, if and how signalization would be required and introduced at Vanderbilt Beach Road intersections with Pristine Drive and Buckstone Drive [when warranted at Pristine, along with specific directional traffic controls and median changes at Buckstone]; clarification about the 150,000 commercial square footage approved and the additional 100,000 square footage requested [with the under-construction self-storage facility already consuming 100,000 of the approved 150,000 sq.ft.]; plans for stormwater management[that will still be tied into southbound flow from the community located to the north], and; plans for lighting and adequate protection to neighboring properties [to be accomplished by limiting fixtures to wall-mounted sconce lamps mounted on the interior sides of walls built along the northern and southern edges of the development]. One speaker voiced opposition to that part of the proposed GMP amendments removing specific prohibitions that will allow gas stations, convenience stores with gas pumps, fast food restaurants with drive through lanes and tire stores [no longer proposed]. Another speaker spoke of a `third- party' cost sharing agreement, which requires a number of property owners to pay the costs associated with roadway and intersection improvements in this area north of Vanderbilt Beach Road. Changes that accelerate the need for these improvements are opposed. Mr. Hood took more questions and comments about the proposed reduction of the buffer area along the northern edge of the development[which can be reduced, as the size of the property has been reduced to less than (a buffer-specific threshold) 15 acres]; locating internal traffic circulation drives behind businesses located on the north half of the property, including driveways, parking areas, back-side entries and delivery and services' activities [plans do not include an internal drive along the full length of the business properties, as each individual commercial property/use may propose these features and activities on a lot-by-lot basis]. A speaker observed how construction of the self-storage facility leaves only a small portion of the developable commercial square footage to be developed on a large portion of the subject property. Statements found in the"permitted uses"section of the draft PUD exhibit read as though the self-storage facility is limited/allocated to the additional 100,000 commercial sq. ft. proposed. But this is not the case, as the already-approved self-storage facility square footage has been allocated from the original 150,000 sq. ft. The developers would find themselves in a predicament [with this PUD provision, or the amount of developable space remaining] if the additional commercial square footage is not approved. Another speaker pointed out the length of time this Agenda Item 9.A partially-developed property had sat idle, and asked about the possibility of another lengthy period of inactivity[which should not occur if the new uses and additional square footage are approved]. A speaker voiced concerns over the proposed strip commercial centers for parcels fronting Vanderbilt Beach Road, and how the front of these buildings will face this roadway; while the back of the buildings will face the east-west Vanderbilt way — internal to the property. This leaves a similar set of issues [posed by traffic circulation areas situated behind businesses located on the south half of the property, including driveways, parking areas, back-side entries and delivery and services' activities] to address and resolve, or to remain another item of opposition. A speaker revisited the traffic circulation issue to and from Collier Boulevard and Vanderbilt Beach Road. Any signalization or other changes at Pristine Drive and Buckstone Drive affects the individual Wolf Creek communities, Mission Hills, and undeveloped lands to the north. Much discussion took place about how future eastbound Vanderbilt Beach Road traffic will be limited to northbound left turns at the Pristine Drive signal or, to crossing Collier Boulevard to U-turn to become westbound, crossing Collier Boulevard again, to then make northbound right turns at Buckstone Drive. Using Collier Boulevard adds further inconvenience and distance to access these areas from Vanderbilt Beach Road. Another speaker characterized this as making a bad traffic situation worse. Speakers asked the application team to communicate with them more and consider holding discussion meetings with the neighbors [agreeable to application team], and emphasized the importance of getting and staying involved. Nearly everyone in attendance [by show of hands] expressed opposition to the proposed changes. The meeting was completed by 7:15 p.m. NIM summary minutes, prepared by the application team, are included in this petition package. [Synopsis prepared by C. Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner] [The application team presented information to more than 35 residents during a November 9 meeting with the Black Bear Ridge Property Owners Association. This presentation was held as a courtesy to inform the neighbors of the changes to the application, and did not serve as an additional NIM] Following the applicant's November 9, 2016, informational presentation and revised resubmittal, the Comprehensive Planning Section of the Zoning Division received a petition with 119 signatures and 115 individual letters from nearby residents stating their objections and concerns. These materials have been copied and are provided as an appendix to this Staff Report. In summary, these materials address the following main points: • Proposed changes [are] out of character with the intents and purposes of Subdistrict; • Increased commercial square feet [and project's] ability to mitigate for associated noise and light; • Types of businesses allowed, redundancy with uses in Mission Hills; • Prohibition on fast food restaurants, drive-through establishments [and project's] ability to handle vehicular stacking/traffic; • Clarity [needed] regarding uses at the self-storage facility; • Increased buffering [needed] along the northerly property line; • Traffic congestion attributable to increased commercial density; and, Agenda Item 9.A • Uncertainty and restrictions on future changes, effect on property values. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The following findings and conclusions result from the reviews and analyses of this request: • A number of documents submitted with this application confirm that the 150,000 overall maximum square footage and the 60,000/90,000 office/retail square footage split were requested [by the original 2003 GMP amendment application] but did not carry over to the adoption ordinance. • The infrastructure needed to serve the development can be provided without related levels of service or concurrency concerns. • The impact from the development on the environment does not pose concerns. • This amendment effects no known historic or archaeological sites. • Documentation submitted confirms that small pieces of land have been dedicated to the County, thereby reducing the size of the property from original 15.88 acres to 14.49 acres. • The property is presently zoned "Carolina Village Mixed Use PUD" and the site is partially developed with a self-storage facility, building pads, infrastructure, street improvements, etc. • The property is presently designated in the GMP for commercial development. This application increases commercial square feet within an existing commercially-designated site; the net effect is an increase of 50,000 sq. ft. of building floor area, and removal of the previously-requested commercial split of 60,000 sq. ft. for offices and 90,000 sq. ft. for retail —which did not carry over. • Based on data and analysis submitted for the supply of, and demand for, existing and potential commercial development within the study area for the subject property, the need for the additional commercial floor area contemplated by this amendment has been demonstrated. This location fulfills the localized need to provide convenient shopping, personal services and employment for neighboring and Golden Gate Estates residential areas. • Correlating amendments to the Carolina Village Mixed Use PUD may be submitted subsequent to, or concurrent with, the Adoption phase of this GMPA application. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: A copy of this Staff Report was provided to the Office of the County Attorney and has been approved as to form and legality. The criteria for land use map amendments are in Section 163.3177(6)(a)2. and 8., Florida Statutes. This staff report was reviewed by the County Attorney's Office on January 30, 2017. [HFAC] [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] Agenda Item 9.A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CP-2015-2 /PL20150002167 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval of the petition with the following revisions to the applicant's proposed Subdistrict text (for proper code language, format, clarity, etc. only — not intended to change allowable uses, intensities, development standards, or other items of substance): Note: Words underlined are added, words struck through are deleted—as proposed by petitioner; words double underlined are added, words doublc struck through are deleted — as proposed by staff. 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, consisting of approximately 47.94 acres, comprised of 33.45 acres of land for the existing area and 15.88 14.49 acres of land for the expansion area, as depicted on the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map. The intent of the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict is to provide convenient shopping, personal services and employment for neighboring and Golden Gate Estates residential areas, as well as to promote mixed-use development (residential uses over commercial uses). The Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict will reduce driving distances for neighboring and Golden Gate Estates residents, assist in minimizing the road network required, and reduce traffic impacts in this part of Collier County. This Subdistrict is further intended to create a neighborhood focal point and any development within this Subdistrict will be designed in a manner to be compatible with the existing and future residential and institutional development in this neighborhood. gross leasable floor area Rezonings are encouraged to be in the form of a PUD zoning district, which must contain devi.rcvelopm ent and design standards to ensure that all commercial-uses will be compatible with and tire stores. Agenda Item 9.A uses over commercial-uses, shall be limited to three stories. All principal buildings shall be set Development within each project or yet to be established PUD District shall be required to have provide for both pedestrian and vehicular interconnections with abutting properties. To encourage mixed use projects, this Subdistrict also permits residential development when located in a mixed-use building (residential uses over commercial uses). Such residential development is allowed at a maximum density of 16 dwelling units per acre; the gross acreage of the project is used in calculating residential density. Retail uses shall be limited to single-story. Financial services and offices shall be limited to three stories. A combination of these uses in a single building = financial services and/or offices over retail uses — shall be limited to three stories. Also, mixed-use buildings, containing residential uses over commercial uses, shall be limited to three stories. All principal buildings shall be set back a minimum of one (1) foot from the Subdistrict boundaries for each foot of building height. Development within each project or yet to be established Planned Unit Development (PUD) District shall be required to have common site, signage and building architectural elements. Each project or PUD District shall provide for both pedestrian and vehicular interconnections with abutting propertiesa_where feasible. Rezonings are encouraged to be in the form of a PUD zoning district, which must contain development and design standards to ensure that all commercial uses will be compatible with neighboring residential and institutional uses. In addition to retail uses and other uses permitted in the Plan, financial institutions, business services, and professional and medical offices shall be permitted. A total of 400,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area is permitted within this Subdistrict as follows:= Development intensity for the existing area of this Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum of 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Within the 14.49-acre expansion area, 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area for commercial land uses is permitted. Of the square footage provided, up to 95,550 square feet may be for air conditioned and mini- and self-stora•e facilities. The remainder of the s•uare foota•e may be for retail and office land uses. arc The followin• land uses shall not be •ermitted_= gas stations, convenience stores with gas pumps, fast food restaurants with drive-through lanes, and tire stores. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] Agenda Item 9.A PREPARED BY: "42 ts,Vut4,61 2017 CORBY SCHMIDTriAICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED rY: DATE: 1-1°— 1-7 DAVID WEEKS.AICP, GROWTH MANAGEMENT MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: DATE: - - -? MIKE BOSI,AICP, DIRECTOR, ZONING DIVISION APPROVE BY: Air DATE: — .70 J FENCH, DEPUTY DE ARTIv1ENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT A:7A( - /, DAVID / I C; DATE: DAVID S. WILKISON, DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PETITION No,: CP-2015-2/PL20150002167 Staff Report for the February 16, 2017 CCPC Meeting. NOTE: This pettion has been scheduled for the March 28, 2017, BCC Meeting, --17 p-xnt:-? ') ;)(1,1f.., Varcli—b It 3eaci-/Coll Cr .3culeva': Commcic al St.bcis? DAVIDSONDE ENGINEERING 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 • Naples, FL 34104 • P: (239)434.6060 F: (239)434.6084 wwwdavidsoncngmccring.com MEMORANDUM September 14, 2016 TO: Corby Schmidt,AICP—Collier County Growth Management Fred Reischl,AICP—Collier County Growth Management FROM: Jessica Harrelson, Senior Project Coordinator REVIEWED BY: Frederick Hood, AICP, Senior Planner RE: Vanderbilt Commons PUDA- P120150002166;GMPA- PL20150002167/CP-2015-2 Neighborhood Information Meeting—Meeting Notes A Neighborhood Information Meeting was held on Wednesday,September 7th, 2016 at the Collier County Vineyards Community Park, located at 6231 Arbor Blvd W, Naples, 34119. The following individuals associated with the review and presentation of the project were present: • Frederick Hood, Davidson Engineering, Inc. • Josh Fruth, Davidson Engineering, Inc. • Jessica Harrelson, Davidson Engineering, Inc. • Jenna Woodward, Davidson Engineering, Inc. • Megan Polk, Davidson Engineering, Inc. • Bruce Anderson, Cheffy Passidomo • Corby Schmidt, Collier County • Fred Reischl, Collier County Fred Hood started the meeting by making a presentation, reading the following: Introduction: o Good evening. My name is Fred Hood with Davidson Engineering. I am the land development consultant representing the applicant Vanderbilt Commons, LLC for a Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) and a Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) application. o Per the land development code, tonight's meeting will be recorded. At the end of my presentation I will be happy to answer any questions you may have about the rezone. Page 1 of 8 DE DAVIDSON F r,;(NFF FIN o Here with me tonight is Bruce Anderson with Cheffy Passidomo (our land use attorney and co-agent for the PUDA and GMPA applications), Josh Fruth, Jenna Woodward and Jessica Harrelson with Davidson Engineering (project engineers and project coordinator) and George Vuko with Welsh Properties, the applicant and developer. o Corby Schmidt and Fred Reischl with the Collier County Growth Management Department are also in attendance tonight and are the reviewing planners for Collier County. Size and Location: o The subject property is approximately 14.5 acres and is located immediately north of Vanderbilt Beach Road about 1/4 of a mile west of Collier Boulevard.The property has frontage along Vanderbilt Beach Road, Pristine and Buckstone Drives;with internal access provided from Vanderbilt Way which bisects the property per an existing and approved plat. o Along the western boundary, there is developed and undeveloped property within the Falls of Portofino residential development within the Wolf Creek RPUD zoning across the Pristine Drive right- of way. Preserve for the Black Bear Ridge residential community, also within the Wolf Creek RPUD, is situated along northern boundary of the subject property. To the immediate east is Buckstone Drive with the commercially zoned and developed Mission Hills CPUD across the Buckstone right-of-way. To the south of the subject property is Vanderbilt Beach Road right-of-way with Estates zoned properties (developed and undeveloped) beyond. Purpose of the GMPA and Rezone: o As I noted earlier,there are two parts to the land use entitlement of the subject property. o The Growth Management Plan describes the vision for the future of the County to ensure that all lands are developed in a manner that makes sense and consistent with the goals and objectives that Collier County has determined for its future. o The PUD defines the development and design standards as well as the commitments outlined as part of the zoning for the specific Vanderbilt Commons property. o Because we are requesting to add the previously excluded land uses in the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict to the PUD (thereby making them permitted uses), not only do we need to change the zoning,we are required to amend the future land use of the subject property.The GMPA process is the application that allows that change to the future land use. o The uses allowed in the current PUD are typically permitted in the C-3 and C-4 commercial Districts as outlined by the LDC. o Per the land development applications in for review with Collier County, the applicant is requesting to make the following changes and or additions: Page 2 of 8 DE DAVIDSON r C. Nr FFIN Ir. • Amend the future land use element to revise the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed-Use District, identified in the Collier County Growth Management Future Land Use Element, to remove an outdated development restriction imposed to address transportation impacts that have been resolved; • Revise certain provisions specific to the 15.88-acre"expansion area"of the 49.33-acre Subdistrict; • Update the acreage in the PUD to show a reduction, from 15.88 acres to roughly 14.5 acres, to reflect portions of Pristine & Buckstone Drive ROWs being deeded to Collier County; • Remove excluded uses to allow gas stations, convenience stores with gas pumps, fast food restaurants with drive through lanes and tire stores; • Remove mixed residential-over-commercial uses; • To correct a scrivener's error that omitted the previously approved square footage (150,000); • Add an additional 100,000 square feet(to the existing permitted 150,000 square feet)for the self- storage land use; • And to include indoor self-storage as an allowed use. • Amending the Carolina Village MPUD to change the name of the PUD to "Vanderbilt Commons CPUD"; • Replace the PUD master plan with an updated "conceptual master plan"; • Permit a deviation from Land Development Code (LDC) Section 5.03.02 H.1.b, in order to remove the requirement to place a wall 4 feet in height a minimum of 3 feet from the rear of the right-of- way landscape buffer line of Vanderbilt Beach Road; and • Reduce the 20-foot perimeter landscape buffers to the widths as required by the LDC as the property is no longer 15 acres. Impacts and Summary of the GMPA and Rezone: o The land use and square footage additions to the PUD and GMP, as outlined previously, have been analyzed through the traffic and utilities level of service studies provided to the County. It has been shown that the proposed developable square footage, at build-out, is not significant or adverse from a traffic generation or utilities consumption standpoint; and in some cases the impacts are less for the available infrastructure at this location. o The stormwater management system for the site has been approved by Collier County under PL20150001453. Therefore, no level of service issues is created by either of the proposed site build- out conditions with respect to surface water management. Page 3 of 8 DE DAVIDSON rt-NC 3NFf'f R1 N C:. o The proposed development, upon completion, will be served by Collier County Public Utilities. The previously proposed mixed-use development has been shown to be significantly higher than those created by the maximum conceptually proposed commercially developed site.With the development of a fully commercial development, less demands will be made on the existing water and sewer systems. o It should also be noted that these land use change requests do not propose revisions to the development standards of the commercial use areas identified per the PUD document, with the exception of the addition of development standards for the air conditioned and enclosed self-storage facility. The addition of development standards have been added to the PUD document in place of the residential standards; which are no longer applicable. o The updated Conceptual Master Plan for both the rezone and the growth management plan amendment,shows a development envelope for the property with required setbacks, buffers and on- site native preservation as required by the Land Development Code and the existing PUD document. o All required vehicular and pedestrian interconnections shall be adhered to with the development of any future projects on the property subject of this application. o The proposed self-storage and additional commercial land uses will result in increased development options for the subject property but will not cause any detrimental level of service to the surrounding area. QUESTIONS: 1. The building under construction will be self-storage? Is it being built without the proposed amendment? Response: Fred explains the Comparable Use Determination and how the self-storage facility was deemed comparable and compatible with the approved land uses within the existing PUD. 2. When was the additional 100,000 square feet added? Our community wasn't made aware of the additional square feet. Response: Fred explains the scrivener's error that occurred within the previous Growth Management Plan Amendment. 3. Do you still have a line that will be connected into Black Bear Ridge's (BBR) drainage system? Response: Fred responded that a connection to the BBR's drainage system is no longer proposed. 4. How will the site lighting be set up to not interfere with Black Bear Ridge? Response: Fred uses the conceptual site plan to show the site and explains his current knowledge �•, of lighting on the site. He also explains that the back of the buildings will have wall-type sconces Page 4 of 8 DE DAVIDSON F N¢C I N F F R 1 N f and not light poles. 5. What are you proposing to do about traffic control within the development? We've had a problem with the private road being used as a "drag strip". Response: Fred and Josh Fruth both responded that typical traffic calming devices will be installed along the private right of way (stop signs, etc.). Also, that once the properties develop the opportunity for using the private right of way as a "drag strip" will no longer be available. Fred also mentioned they may add speed bumps to the private road. 6. Residents expressed concerns with traffic controls and ingress/egress onto Vanderbilt. Are you proposing a light at Buckstone? Response: Fred stated that a traffic light is not proposed at Buckstone but instead being proposed at Pristine. Fred also mentioned that out the County has plans to possibly close the access point from Buckstone to Vanderbilt. 7. BBR residents expressed opposition for the additional uses proposed for the PUD and increasing the intensity. The residents also expressed their concerns regarding traffic, safety, noise, pollution, lights, taxes and the potential negative impacts to their property values. The residents further inquired why the amendment is being requested? Response: Fred replied that the developer is just looking for the opportunity to explore different options. 8. Is there a specific tenant proposed at this time? Response: Fred answered that just the zoning is being sought and there are no specific tenants at this time. 9. What are the benefits to the BBR Community? Response: Fred replied the additional land uses being sought. 10. Where will the reduced landscape buffers be and where will the wall be eliminated? Response: Fred uses the conceptual site plan to indicate the landscape buffers and the location of the wall deviation. 11. A resident requests information on why"neighboring properties" are responsible for a portion of the roadway improvements. Response: Fred explains the recorded Third-Party Cost Sharing Agreement that was previously established. 12. Traffic control and issues were again discussed by several residents. Page 5of8 DE DAVIDSON 13. Why is there a reduction in the landscape buffer being requested? Response: Fred replied that it is no longer required because the site does not meet the criteria in the Land Development Code for the buffer. He also states that it is the developer's right to request it. 14. Is there going to be an access road at the rear of the back lots/buildings? There is a road there now. Response: Fred answered that there is not an access road proposed in that location and explains that the existing road is for construction purposes only. Plans for access along the rear of lots could happen depending on the site development plan but are not proposed at this time. Fred uses the conceptual site plan to show the currently approved access points to the site. Fred later explains, per code, you have to be able to access three sides of the building. Corby Schmidt requests that everyone speak one at a time. 15. Why is there a reduction in the acreage on the site? Response: Fred explained the ROWs that were deeded to Collier County for both Buckstone and Pristine reduced the acreage on the site. r-. 16. Explanation of the scrivener's error and when the PUD was approved? How was the self-storage facility approved? Response: Fred explained the 15.88-expansion area of the GMP and the approved 150,000 square feet that was omitted from the text language. Fred also explained the Comparable Use Determination and that the self-storage facility was deemed comparable by Collier County, being viewed as more of a retail establishment than an office use. 17. If you don't get the approval for the additional square footage, does the self-storage facility take up all of the retail space, only leaving office space square footage? Response: Fred replied that was correct. 18. What are the next steps in the process and the timeframe? Response: Fred and Corby explain the hearing processes and timelines for both the PUDA and GMPA and the purpose of the Neighborhood Information Meeting. 19. If this is not approved, what will be the developer's options for retail space? How much remaining? Response: Fred replied about 50,000 square feet of retail space remains currently on site. Page 6 of 8 � f g„,.„ DAVIDSON 20. Are they selling parcels off or will there be a single owner? Response: Fred uses the conceptual site plan to show the current plan of ownership/tenants. 21. Where are you going to have parking for the proposed two strip center buildings with the proposed 16 units? Response: Fred explained the parking standards for Collier County and how the site will meet the standards. 22. How do we express our concerns in an organized fashion? Response: Fred Reischl stated that emails, attendance to hearings, and phone calls would all be ways to express concerns. 23. Will this project drag out? Response: Fred replied that the developer is aggressively looking to develop the property. 24. Will the shopping centers have free standing units? Response: Fred uses the conceptual site plan to indicate that there will be two separate buildings for the shopping center. 25. Will these have retail on the first floor and offices on the second? II Response: Fred replies that the shopping centers are currently only proposed to be one story. 26. Will you look at the rear of the buildings when driving east on Vanderbilt? Response: Fred responded that the front of the buildings would face Vanderbilt, and explains the landscape buffers. 27. If this change is approved,there could be more than one drive-thru? Response: Fred responds that there could potentially be more than one drive thru, but currently only one is proposed. 28. Has the proposed daycare gone away? Response: Fred replied that the daycare use has not been eliminated. 29. Is there a possibility of a movie theater? Response: Fred responded that a movie theater is a possibility but not feasible at this time. Page 7 of 8 DE DAVIDSON F e1INFFF N 30. Are the proposed changes lot specific? Response: Fred answered that the changes are for the entire development. 31. Are there requirements for security cameras? Response: Fred replied security cameras are not a requirement but could be installed. 32. Will the preserve remain? Response: Fred answered the existing preserve will remain. He also explained the Type "A"landscape buffer requirement. 33. What is a Type "A" buffer? Response: Fred responded that he believed it was a 10 foot wide buffer with trees planted 30 feet on center and no shrubs required. 34. What triggers the traffic study? (More discussion regarding concerns with traffic&safety). Response: Fred replied that the residents need to contact Collier County regarding their concerns about existing intersections and traffic issues. Fred Reischl also replied and directed the residents to contact Collier County Staff with their concerns. Fred discusses the traffic impact statement that was prepared for the existing PUD and the proposed PUDA. 35. What are all of the roadway improvements that are part of the shared costs? Response: Fred responded that there is information on the costs within the third-party agreement. 36. Can you install a barrier of some sort along the back so we can't see headlights? Response: Fred replied that it would be looked at. Fred Reischl spoke more about the purpose of the Neighborhood Information Meeting and why they were instituted. 37. Is the recording of the meeting available to the public? Response: The recording becomes part of the public record and will be available. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:00p.m. End of memo. "-v Page 8 of 8 VANDERBILT COMMONS NIM 9.7.2016 DE NG NII ON t;.h3GIF�4 S.�RENG Name Address Phone (1', \QCL -1\-\(3. ( .' )'`)':(U M •&-t. (\')9 2 X11 : --\\M( `• 9� 3 r\ c \ L. t, `s- `, 6 .�cr,i/ 6:r 'S t, '"2 /`1. A-c.,c v, `�.tl c� Q, _12-1 - --(:_01()\-7 k 8 4 4"- G Q �`°'li't-",--.+a —I of I kr-or-v‘ r omi 9 54eu,e a cc.,v.,5 '1„9„.t 3 A iw, 10 &u,tA i t 6(Zee_ I3 AN:AN W¢}`{ 11 .,b)" Fa ,,1 (5.)? 1 � / 11 14 11 12 4 7 a(,(a ct-tt,„,_ -1,!7_, 13 -) *- ' a',- (17-34,6,<, `?at"Y, 72 .1A- „,-- .-Av h � v 14 e� clit'j/���MW.-42.-y- 40(3 iyL7 i7 2 3 b /ig,-,9 '/A1 '1 15 16 /d/ / ,, 73 ,, tri l 17 f VA�CC C- 'l `?s9/ "t- 18 1 y'( x 37 ) ?,,3 11 j<'/L,/ ki i GMPA-PL20150002541/CPSS-2015-4 and RZ-PL20140002642 VANDERBILT COMMONS NIM 9.7.2016 DE NEE ENC ON eruc�rvea,N; Name Address 1, n (� Phone 19 `ate Z-���60hCc i)JS c i ' ►,"I ��S' t7 /V c' °e\ _____ 20 ►f�r�rDQv yr ` `o w Pt s [ t 7 2 3 .2 / CD r et /(xja.tt (Pial' `d 0 S 1 g rA 21 d�asrrot-n a It c,/�lLt.?! �a 't s? Y92 ,1r / , 22 , ,,, � eG' 7 'f 2�y .e39-3 _az. 23 0.4,.4rs�.�u" 13 3 5 c,m r n `fit" � �tl ,��I 39 5-e- 24 `� 24 '2 7LGt - 4'c4 -ca }023 A A-c 0#.-(—/ 14/ y �,2c1'q-,20 9-oa'v 25.7eyfrl `--,ji,/ 49-116 l/C14 73 c)-1 / /Q tr(/f J 73)-1-15.31 e Pi 26 c)ti all+?-.A e/k:'t iti 14 fr7 7q LP if ii 28`ti L f,+�' '�!' ( /, rl `' —f 6 -7�0 4' et (/1 . aC r 3(`i `2,; 29 f ritt/1 e 7,50/24/AS -7‘3 F tr' / ' -'fit/ / —.6 OP—7 7f 3a h c .,-~.' 7 titil 4-6&(%(- a.2. 31 l t1( C-6' !, 2,9c- 4-66 ',.. D24 75.E 0 ; 32 (2�Se+n\or -1. 10 }}-c Ot`h.vkict_,�.\ r? c311 4-lel. -7/5, , a„,,,,Lk.t.,4 -73 ,5"- 4,eyze a./ C6:70P3c".-000 36 Yl. e_., 137e z-rA W0 0,31-57 ,777 GMPA-PL201500025411 CPSS-2015-4 and RZ-PL20140002642 T... VANDERBILT COMMONS NIM 9.7.2016 NG NESON HN CBt NE£RI M Name Address f`` / Phone 37 ter eh/ 74.9e7 b3/-93S-7 38 Ab Aj 1 44'01'0 { 1 4- C>CYN. { tt., NLIry�L\-W r { g ?t�i -666 a rr:bDrti, 4l °am cit r 7 A Wall / fid?_(off ne7) 41 vt &' t V /if t�t f ,- 73 42 f„rJ/. et.�� �i 1 3 rf 4 c at, gio- `'b ' l 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 GMPA-PL20150002541/CPSS-2015-4 and RZ-PL20140002642 RP19 PUD MPUD GOLDEN GATE FIRE DISTRICT "" RPUD PALERMO STATION COVE RPUD A MPUD "TX." 7 -- - SONOMA WOLF OAKS CREEK Vanderbilt Beach RD(`p alL RPUD RI PUD PROJECTUD MISSION HILLS LOCATION £ CAROLINA MPUD SLANDWALK VILLAGE CI mGolden Gate BLVD W ■ - -- "" a N SITE LOCATION E to as Pine Ridge RD Location Map Zoning Map Petition Number: PUDA - PL-2015-2166 In the Know: Restaurants, retail coming to new center on Vanderbilt Beach Road % Tim Aten, tim.aten@naplesnews.com; 239-263-4857 7:02 a.m. EDT August 29, 2016 aw y:�a ✓i/y r a x Vanderbilt Commons retail center will include more than 30 units fronting Vanderbilt Beach Road just west of Collier Boulevard.(Photo: Welsh Companies Florida) 346 CONNECTTWEET 6 LINKEDIN 1 COMMENTEMAILMORE Q: What is being built on that strip of vacant land just east of Island Walk and west of Tuffy (Tire and Auto Service Center) on Vanderbilt Beach Road? After laying quiet for many years, there is now a lot of movement on that parcel of land. —John W. Zasoba, North Naples A: What you see being built is merely the beginning of what is planned by this time next year for Vanderbilt Commons, a new commercial development with restaurant, retail and medical space. A proposed retail center fronting Vanderbilt Beach Road just west of the shopping center on Collier Boulevard anchored by Winn-Dixie, Vanderbilt Commons will include more than 30 units, said George Vukobratovich, president/broker of Welsh Companies Florida. Welsh, a Naples-based commercial real estate firm, will own and operate the new retail center, Vukobratovich said."This is a big project," he said. "We're invested in this, our company, our investors. We are going to own it and operate it." Y wS T p Vanderbilt Commons retail center will be built fronting Vanderbilt Beach Road just west of Collier Boulevard. Midgard Self Storage's three-story warehouse is under construction at the rear of the property. (Photo: Tim Aten/Naples Daily News) The first phase— a nearly 35,000-square-foot, one-story strip center is targeted for completion in the first quarter of 2017. The second phase a nearly 37,000-square-foot strip center that practically mirrors the first is scheduled for completion in the third quarter of next year. "We want Phase 2 to come on line maybe a year from now, maybe sooner if we can do it," Vukobratovich said. Midgard Self Storage, under construction on more than 2 acres on the northwest corner of Vanderbilt Commons, will be a 95,550-square-foot, three-story, climate-controlled miniwarehouse. : , -, 4 '''''''!;,,,,,'"-,„::,: :4 . 0-41,1f7 :I' ..1::P''4,,,,,,... ' I ; ' ' '7--'. ',:' r,4 m - : I gi , Ityl, 42 14., 1.,444, .*,,,,, , ii A conceptual sketch of Midgard Self Storage, the first business under construction in Vanderbilt Commons, a commercial project on Vanderbilt Beach Road west of Collier Boulevard. (Photo: Patrick M. Pillot Architect Inc.) "That was the first stage of selling a piece of that property, but it's not anything to do with the retail that's going across the front,"Vukobratovich said. The two strip centers, in line on 6.5 acres along Vanderbilt Beach Road, will have about 16 units of varying sizes. The intention is to open three restaurants in each building, but no more," Vukobratovich said. "We are going to be part of trying to do a good mix of local tenants and also national tenants,"he said. "That creates a synergy that makes a center work." The only tenant specifically named so far is CPR Cell Phone Repair Naples, a company that repairs cellphones, computers and other electronic devices. Another CPR location operates on Radio Road in East Naples. "That's a very needed service out there,"Vukobratovich said. Although none of the restaurants were named, the endcap on the eastern edge of the second phase is planned for a drive-thru window. "We don't have that signed yet, but that's there," Vukobratovich said. Other businesses expected to sign on include a pet store, nail salon, hair salon and a cellphone provider. The project has medical zoning, as well, Vukobratovich said."We anticipate some medical services,"he said. I ' L. __1._i P 444 #' oar '. I r 11431/41F StaxElost amort ikAidins Architectural renderings show the first retail center proposed for Vanderbilt Commons, a retail center coming to Vanderbilt Beach Road west of Collier Boulevard. (Photo: Don Stevenson Design) The exterior of the strip center is planned to have an Old Florida look,with shell rock stone on /''N the face of part of the buildings. "We are going to do some things we know fit our environment, our community,"Vukobratovich said. "This site is really going to serve the local community." Because Vanderbilt Beach Road doesn't have an Interstate 75 interchange, as do neighboring Pine Ridge and Immokalee roads, it lacks the businesses necessary to serve residents in that fast- growing area. Vanderbilt Commons is one of the first commercial centers designed to serve local residents driving west from Golden Gate Estates, Vukobratovich said. "The amount of rooftops coming out there will blow your mind. It's unbelievable,"he said. Immediately to the east of the self-storage business will be a water retention area. To the east of the pond are two lots, each more than 1 acre, for future development. This northeast corner is directly behind the second strip center. Vanderbilt Commons will occupy more than 14 acres bordered to the east by Mission Hills shopping center, to the west by The Falls of Portofino townhomes, and to the north by preserve area for the Black Bear Ridge subdivision. At one time planned to be the Carolina Commons condominium complex, the project's scope changed over time from a residential neighborhood to a mixed-use project to a solely commercial development. n RESOLUTION NO. 17- -- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO REVISE THE VANDERBILT BEACH/COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT OF THE URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ADD THE PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED 150,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES FOR THE 14.492 ACRE TRACT PER PETITION NO. CP-2003-1; TO ADD 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LEASABLE FLOOR AREA TO THE EXISTING 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES AND THE PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED 150,000 SF OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES FOR A TOTAL OF 400,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LEASABLE FLOOR AREA OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES; TO REMOVE A DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTION RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS; TO AMEND AND RE-ORDER THE TEXT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT SUBDISTRICT IS 47.94± ACRES AND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY VI MILE WEST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PL20150002167/CP-2015-1] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Petitioner, Vanderbilt Commons, LLC, has initiated this amendment to the Future Land Use Element; and WHEREAS, on , the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the.Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authorit:' [15-CMP-00959] 76 PL2015-2167/CP-2015-1 Page 1 of 2 1/18/17 Words underlined are added,words struckh have been deleted. granted to it by Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, on , the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty (30) days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty (180)days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote this day of , 2017. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: , Deputy Clerk Penny Taylor, chairman Approved as to form and legality: VAA:(4"" , Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit"A"—text [15-CMP-00959] 76 PL2015-2167/CP-2015-1 Page 2 of 2 1/18/17 Words underlined are added,words struck through have been deleted. PL20150002167 CP-2015-2 EXHIBIT'A'TEXT FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT A. Urban Mixed Use District PAGE 37 This Subdistrict is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and neighborhood. Development intensity for this Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum of 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. . .. _ •: • _ •- . • _.• .. . • . . ---- -•--- . •: . •- Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall be contingent upon prohibition of issuance of Rezoni-ngs-are encouraged to be in the form of a PUD zoning district, which must contain development To encourage mixed use projects, this Subdistrict also permits residential development when located in a maximum density of 16 dwelling units per acre; the gross acreage of the project is used in calculating residential density. the Subdistrict boundaries for each feet-of building height. Development within each project or yet to be - . . - •- ' • - • - - - - " - • . : :.• • . • - . . Words struck through are deletions;words underlined are additions. PL20150002167 CP-2015-2 9.Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, consisting of approximately 47.94 acres, comprised of 33.45 acres of land for the existing area and 14.49 acres of land for the expansion area, as depicted on the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map. The intent of the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict is to provide convenient shopping, personal services and employment for neighboring and Golden Gate Estates residential areas, as well as to promote mixed-use development (residential uses over commercial uses). The Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict will reduce driving distances for neighboring and Golden Gate Estates residents, assist in minimizing the road network required, and reduce traffic impacts in this part of Collier County. This Subdistrict is further intended to create a neighborhood focal point and any development within this Subdistrict will be designed in a manner to be compatible with the existing and future residential and institutional development in this neighborhood. To encourage mixed useproiects, this Subdistrict also permits residential development when located in a mixed-use building(residential uses over commercial uses). Such residential development is allowed at a maximum density of 16 dwelling units per acre; the gross acreage of the project is used in calculating residential density. Retail uses shall be limited to single-story. Financial services and offices shall be limited to three stories. A combination of these uses in a single building financial services and/or offices over retail uses —shall be limited to three stories. Also, mixed-use buildings, containing residential uses over commercial uses, shall be limited to three stories. All principal buildings shall be set back a minimum of one (1) foot from the Subdistrict boundaries for each foot of building height. Development within each project or yet to be established PUD District shall be required to have common site, signage and building architectural elements. Each project or PUD District shall provide for both pedestrian and vehicular interconnections with abutting properties. Rezonings are encouraged to be in the form of a PUD zoning district, which must contain development and design standards to ensure that all commercial uses will be compatible with neighboring residential and institutional uses. In addition to retail uses and other uses permitted in the Plan, financial institutions, business services, and professional and medical offices shall be permitted. A total of 400,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area is permitted within this Subdistrict. Development intensity for the existing area of this Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum of 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Within the 14.49-acre expansion area, 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area for commercial land uses is permitted. Of the square footage provided, up to 95,550 square feet may be for self-storage facilities. The remainder of the square footage may for retail and office land uses and the following land uses shall not be permitted; gas stations, convenience stores with gas pumps, fast food restaurants with drive-through lanes,and tire stores. Words stFu-eli4lafeug14 are deletions;words underlined are additions. NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission will hold a public meeting on Thursday, February 16, 2017, commencing at 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor,County Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN,ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO REVISE THE VANDERBILT BEACH/COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT OF THE URBAN MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ADD THE PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED 150,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES FOR THE 14.492 ACRE TRACT PER PETITION NO. CP-2003-1; TO ADD 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LEASABLE FLOOR AREA TO THE EXISTING 200,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES AND THE PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED 150,000 SF OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES FOR A TOTAL OF 400,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS LEASABLE FLOOR AREA OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES; TO REMOVE A DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTION RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION INPACTS; TO AMEND AND RE-ORDER THE TEXT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT SUBDISTRICT IS 47.94± ACRES AND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE WEST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTION 34,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. [PL20150002167/CP-2015-1 PL20150002167 Immokalee RD -4- PROJECT Ci LOCATION ---ir--\\ID 17\\5 0 V U o 0 Vanderbilt Beach RD tY q c o m a, Golden Gate BLVD W o - _ Pine Ridge RD aE S All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division,Comprehensive Planning Section,2800 N.Horseshoe Dr., Naples,between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.,Monday through Friday.Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 401,Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Section of the GMD Zoning Division.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thursday,February 16,2017, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Mark P.Strain,Chairman Collier County Planning Commission January 27,2017 No.1448492 ND.,a<8a92 0 PROOF O.K.BY: 0 O.K.WITH CORRECTIONS BY: PLEASE READ CAREFULLY•SUBMIT CORRECTIONS ONLINE ADVERTISER:BCC_COMPREHENSIVE PLANNI PROOF CREATED AT: 1/20/2017 4:05 PM SALES PERSON: Ivonne Gori PROOF DUE:- PUBLICATION:ND-DAILY NEXT RUN DATE:01/27/17 ND-1448492.INDD SIZE: 3 col X 9.25 in 7:=70....1': � 7 �'.s � £ ry � ..:�:T`__..«l. ` —'�'£FY- �"t: _ - 4 r— ""i.#". ! . w� ti:. 1',- .14 ":(3.r>. .' -- i�a *gym`».,- --,1:4-':b,!j. � '' „ ?�' '0.1."' ... £ � *4* P"..., ''`t< s � S1'" "„Y ' R ,,=;.-3= ii.�: i,, . ":*air"_x11::'? <-. -S';S I:-Ti`lt1t ' '.f .) '•: '•,::��+ (17l�.^:':t �jrt''R 'Sz57tJ� i�� .i 1"ln:ixT+y}'' r<, '4^: isYy:'• .1:R,. j"u;4'4' - '�:hY"'p,j«y,,,, Los.j wHs�r I � � .r'("f��.'_:.ic ;'; :It"'',...-Mix;',-‘ � .i 'A.4 i" .R -..'. -v- ' :i � }'' X1;.' ji.( f„Y:;:..-:' 3_ 1 ...'. •;!s : '.r; , i. . ;.. r u £x, lt''=,°:'(.3„{-=.01--4;.,...1, t;.t'e;i-er�}•_{;1t'r ;,1'.i "lie ,S' t '' . ..=;,',.-'..2.•, ‘4,1 ”-1 , e•,::- 411.t44.il 14 ir ,k • .zr: .,i`. •s„ 1 x'%'c. *4„.„,„„... ,(tip,': ' jig _ • .. a.,+,,,,,, :t.,,.: M , r: ' _ £Fi '" P, �..r, ,-1' r '� a` s x{G::^`,-• 1" i£i• ��, •a, s • 1 *:**1:: ,c:. :!l' . -i1x. .,W33v�iwIff:'s.,„1 Y»? vd1 , '. xy. yY . • r i:R 4%44 4, -i _ JrW-.4.-.=.YS' `1 +u�,• }' -• i'+�: ! " . ~' 44, ' • '; -;.t:�.*,,,hi;,, .'T44`.ri'•.,`y,,„ "'„i ,' ,'-,, .�> .mss H. �t It.i.Vis:: . * 3ii::".:is - o?ii i':, i..s£ :rt. N'(',:.14 t�•�,44;;:+t•• "`,.',`,i'� .`f-`=t, u 1 ;4'`'-",- -`r :.;,:.'54,-..--,yj {'"' .. . , '!'. - ':t''... _ b.,; (�. ;..-_-;,..-,,r-,."'•jf4-S-•£:: .. .:.:1, >:Yi . :iai:iii;,, .}a iYr!:',.;.�.,Ril{;i'I ,:is.,i,,.,,;jr,,:ial4;,�9* ',wt ,,r-,.,;, ,, £.»�'.'x' �t'� .. 'f:l: ". - ',� •�')"�• .. .. - +a•''4:�':f;',!';_..-" ;i }rtwµ�:,;. :�;'::r: _i ,,: Yi%yi.% • ,, '• E 1.!}, i-<[s` - ':. ',,,-1,-y 17 ' ;h. • "i: •4...,xi;; i".• V'''. -'t i -'•I'' ' s.;4,. {zs'4;1»=4' "..--•;;t; (', il.:,.)dta's't'.ir-::' -,a ,t.'t':•'1i.. 'i't. • ; ., +4« I : -011;"..i--':.- ryx,- ij:,,:-�ii; .i "",:::1 0.• irotel !"i•- `..= T` di ,i_ :,`,`•<i•. .. • :la lxf, ii. r :. .Yx •x 4: ',!a, S+,-;' -UCh " y... `� '£': y. :4f i': 4h9i ix ' 1 ,i�-ldeSthe Ci• •i •1t—:•{. it .• r R ',Y`.k-= t". ."L , 'i "i; lv>, _ ~ •• 51 '. • :!=-',"*" f ` .'t" ' ..� • i., £ �x .,., .. 41't ';f Y t. � S -.1' y'( if131� 1. C' t� rctk=4 '_i• :t-x:..F. i' � �)l:i��s`";-i.t+ T'tt},,.... t;•i; 1�� �" �- •I •7 I'_. ii t• 441'., 1:'••=,. -...=,- sY , ``dx.« :.1 'iIt'�•t`iY. :., t-.' .4 is�Y •,: '-�,i`_3 yvx y ':I E 1;,1 ,,. ., ',,7,1,.11:,4 f 2keel•,a six: :k15C, i t Sit: .''i' <3 iz ' .,. ~[ 1. ..tg 144 1,3:,..,� . 4;4(239) ' ,{ 4•:,- ` (1,-,-.?", ,.v.,Mc 11 e;44 7',, ...c- •,. c,-_ ,,4 h hci impaired ore -' :`':i!-:a •-4 t}:o .:4 <. : ',7„,'' .+=4.,x.."44 t, P'•. _'.4i4 'S� i::' i.74 . . 41, x ; .`_: , , '..i. ".'ytewv 4. tom •/4{, 4 );;-i is4L.. :� f x is '', ,i, . .'1,-, „. i ,r'.'* .Yw r.,..:.« r..y.fav i�'�,'''•Y Ci''.r -..sx.`T?,•' ,'s`.q:k.:.sx,`' .,�'."'•--`r, 4';'= ,,, •� 4344, • - s''':,,V”,.`•''' , .. W 335 r.e• j �Ej, Et '�}' <`+'I';k'� •. '•a�3{j�y o •'�' Y` �•��',�III ��. � �i'.�i DE DAVIDSON ENGINEERING 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 • Naples, FL 34104 • P(239)434.6060 • F(239)434.6084 www.davidsonengineenng.com P Mr. Corby Schmidt,AICP January 6,2017 Principal Planner Collier County Development Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA PL20150002167/CP-2015-2 Dear Mr. Schmidt, In response to the Insufficiency Letter received January 3, 2017,we offer the following responses: 1. Based on the attached proposed GMPA language:The existing area (33.45 acres) is limited to a maximum of 200,000 square feet; and the expansion area (15.88 acres) is permitted a maximum of 200,000 square feet. That means the subdistrict gets 400,000 square feet of commercial. If this is not correct, revise the Exhibit"C" GMPA text accordingly. Response: We have added a clarifying statement to the proposed language that reads: "A total of 400,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area is permitted within this Subdistrict." Please see the revised Exhibit C. 2. Provide breakdown of the names of the owners to the names of individuals for CCPC and BCC conflicts check. Response:Please see the revised Disclosure of Interests form for the conflicts check. 3. Per GMP/CIE Policy 1.5,the potable water system LOSS and the wastewater treatment system LOSS are based on population. Population growth is facilitated by residential development and only non-residential development is proposed by this petition/application. So, revise Exhibit "R"to indicate no impact on potable water facility or wastewater treatment system capacity. Response:Acknowledged. Exhibit R has been revised to reflect the requested note. DE DAVIDSON FNGINFERING If you have any questions regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact me at 239.434.6060 or via email at fred@davidsonengineering.com. Sincerely, Frederick E. Hood,AICP Senior Planner Proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Prepared For: Vanderbilt Commons, LLC c/o Welsh Companies of Florida, Inc. 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 and Prepared By: Davidson Engineering, Inc. 4365 Radio Road,Suite 201 Naples, FL 34104 October, 2015 Revised February, 2016 Revised November, 2016 DE LIST OF EXHIBITS Application to Amend the Growth Management Plan Exhibit A Professional Qualifications Sheet Exhibit B Proposed GMP Text Amendment Language Exhibit C Location Map Exhibit D Aerial Location Map Exhibit E Aerial Plan w/Florida Land Cover Classification System Overlay&NRCS Soils Mapping Exhibit F Potential Listed Species Table Exhibit G Surrounding Zoning Districts Map Exhibit H Surrounding Future Land Use Designations Map Exhibit I Historical/Archaeological Probability Exhibit J Proximity to Public Services Map Exhibit K Recorded Warranty Deed Exhibit L Letter of Authorization Exhibit M Alternative Site Analysis Exhibit N Conceptual Master Plan Exhibit 0 Boundary Survey Exhibit P Traffic Impact Statement Exhibit Q Comparative Level of Service Analysis Exhibit R Utility Availability Statement Exhibit S Narrative&Justification of the Proposed GMP Amendment Exhibit T Disclosure of Interest Exhibit U Planning Communities Map Exhibit V Existing Land Use Map Exhibit W Future Land Use Map Exhibit X Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE PAYLE SONS EXHIBIT "A" APPLICATION TO AMEND THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER DATE RECEIVED PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE October 9, 2015 DATE SUFFICIENT This application,with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Department, Suite 400, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252-2400 (Fax 239-252-2946). The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant Ralph Cioffi, Manager Company Vanderbilt Commons, LLC c/o Welsh Companies of Florida, Inc. Address c/o Welsh Companies of Florida, Inc. 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 City NaplesState Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239.261.4744 Fax Number 239.403.0977 B. Name of Agent* Frederick E. Hood, AICP & R. Bruce Anderson • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Davidson Engineering, Inc. & Cheffy Passidomo, P.A. Address 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 & 821 5th Avenue South City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34104x341oz Phone Number 239.434.6060/239.261.9300 Fax Number 239.434.6084/239.261.9782 C. Name of Owner (s) of Record Vanderbilt Commons, LLC Address c/o Welsh Companies of Florida, Inc. 2950 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239.261.4744 Fax Number 239.403.0977 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL,Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). 1 Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock VANDERBILT COMMONS,LLC- Ralph Cioffi,Manager 100% Members: -VC Investor,LLC(please see Ex.U) 33.33% -SMS-USA Holdings,LLC(please see Ex.U) 33.33% -Jam Properties,Inc.(please see Ex.U) 33.33% C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE,with an individual or individuals, a Corporation,Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership 2 Date of Contract: F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY OCCURED ON JANUARY 30,2015 If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing,it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST;SUBJECT TO EXISTING RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD, SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER AND ACROSS THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF AND THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF. B. GENERAL LOCATION IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD,APPROXIMATELY 1/4 OF A MILE WEST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD. C. PLANNING COMMUNITY URBAN ESTATE" D. TAZ 179 SEE EXHIBIT"V" E. SIZE IN ACRES+/-15.88 ac(EXPANSION AREA) F. ZONING CAROLINA VILLAGE MPUD-ORDINANCE 2005-19 G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN SEE EXHIBIT"O"FOR SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERNS H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS)VANDERBILT BEACH RD/COLLIER BLVD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Recreation/Open Space Traffic Circulation Sub-Element Mass Transit Sub-Element Aviation Sub-Element Potable Water Sub-Element Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element NGWAR Sub-Element Solid Waste Sub-Element Drainage Sub-Element Capital Improvement Element CCME Element X Future Land Use Element Golden Gate Master Plan 3 Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S) 36-37 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike through to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: SEE EXHIBIT"C"FOR THE TEXT AMENDMENT LANGUAGE C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM TO PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE ARE NO MAP AMENDMENTS PROPOSED D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) N/A E. DESCRIBE ADDITINAL CHANGES REQUESTED: N/A V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN 1"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE SEE EXHIBIT"H"&"ver Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. SEE EXHIBIT"D"&"E" Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. EE EXHIBITS"H"&""o" Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION SEE EXHIBITS"I"&"X" Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands,with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL SEE EXHIBIT"F" Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE:THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. SEE EXHIBIT"G" Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish &Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.),Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. 4 D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2(Copies attached). 1. INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: NO Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(1)(a)(5), F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. NO Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.a, F.A.C.) NO Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County-wide population by more than 5%of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. YES-See Exhibit"T" Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-1 1.007, F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: EXHIBITS°R°&°S" Potable Water EXHIBITS"R"&"S" Sanitary Sewer EXHIBIT„Q" Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS The subject property shall be served by the existing drainage system.The proposed project will provide X Drainage water management design consistent with Collier County criteria. X Solid Waste The subject property shall be served by the existing solid waste provider serving the area. N/A Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. EXHIBIT"K" Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e.water, sewer,fire protection, police protection,schools and emergency medical services. 3 EXHIBIT"R" Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. 5 F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: ZONEX Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N/A Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N/A Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable N/A Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable N/A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION X $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) N/A $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Exhibit"L" Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Exhibit"M" Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Acknowledged 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed,25 copies of the complete application will be required. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1"=400' or at a scale as determined during the pre-application meeting. 6 DIE DAVIDSON [Nf__INf FRiNC EXHIBIT "B" PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS SHEET Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE DAVID50N EXHIBIT "B" PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS SHEET Davidson Engineering,Inc. Frederick E. Hood,AICP Senior Planner Mr. Hood has a Bachelor's of Urban Planning from the University of Cincinnati's College of Design Architecture Art and Planning. He has been a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) and has practiced land planning in Southwest Florida since 2006. During his career in urban planning, for over twelve years, Mr. Hood has managed large and small development projects while working closely with a myriad of land development professionals in the physical development and policy adoption of residential, commercial, mixed-use, institutional and industrial projects. Mr. Hood has been tendered and accepted as an expert in land planning in cities and counties throughout Florida as well as being tendered as an expert witness in the area of Urban and Land Use Planning. Mr. Hood continues to attend continuing education seminars to remain current on planning theory and methodologies in an ever-changing regulatory environment. Cheffy Passidomo,P.A. R. Bruce Anderson Attorney at Law Mr. Anderson has more than 30 years private and public sector experience in zoning, land use and environmental law in Southwest Florida. He represents property owners and national and regional developers of residential, commercial, industrial, mining, and mixed-use community projects, on issues and matters such as: rezoning, planned unit developments, developments of regional impact, conditional use permits, variances, environmental issues, land development code amendments, comprehensive plan amendments, public/private partnerships and other growth management permit and development order issues. Mr. Anderson is certified by the Florida Supreme Court as a Certified Circuit and County Court Mediator. Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE DAVIDSON GNC.INGGRINC. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Norman J.Trebilcock,AICP, P.E. President Mr. Trebilcock has a Bachelor's Degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Miami and a Master's Degree in Engineering, with an emphasis in Public Works from the University of Florida. He is also a graduate of the US Army Engineer Officer Basic Course. Mr. Trebilcock has practiced transportation planning and engineering in Southwest Florida since 1990. Mr. Trebilcock produces plans, designs, and permitting efforts on public works and private sector projects. His primary area of expertise is in transportation engineering, including highway design, utility relocation, drainage design, street lighting, signalization, access management and permitting. He prepares and reviews traffic impact statements and related reports. In addition to being a registered Professional Engineer and holding a certification from the American Institute of Certified Planners, Mr. Trebilcock holds an FDOT Advanced Work Zone Traffic Control Certification. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA is classified as a Small Business Enterprise with the South Florida Management District and the FDOT. Earth Tech Environmental,LLC Jeremy Sterk Ecologist\Partner Jeremy has been an environmental consultant in Southwest Florida since 1994 and has worked on projects throughout Collier, Lee, Hendry, DeSoto, Glades, and Charlotte counties. Jeremy holds an active real estate license and his experience in the early stages of property due diligence studies greatly assists clients in making informed decisions. His extensive and varied experience allows him to successfully guide clients through the local,state,and federal permitting maze. This experience includes environmental land use planning, environmental resource permitting, vegetation and habitat mapping, protected species surveys, protected species management plans, environmental impact statements, property use studies, post permit compliance, and GIS\GPS mapping. In 1998, he wrote an ecological assessment computer model for the South Florida Water Management District as part of the South Lee County Watershed Study. Jeremy is certified by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) as a Gopher Tortoise Agent. In addition to authoring dozens of habitat and species management plans, in 2007, Jeremy co-authored the first habitat conservation plan (HCP) in the nation to address incidental take issues for both red cockaded woodpeckers (RCW) and Florida panther on the same property. Jeremy was a member of the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee from 2009 to 2014 and is currently a member of the Development Services Advisory Committee (DSAC). Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DIE DAVIDSON ENGINEERING EXHIBIT "C" Proposed GMP Text Amendment Language Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com EXHIBIT"C" FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Urban Mixed Use District This Subdistrict is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard,consisting of approximately 33.15 acres of land for the existing arca and 15.88 acres of Subdistrict Map.The intent of the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict is to provide The Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict will reduce driving distances for reduce traffic impacts in this part of Collier County. This Subdistrict is further intended to create a compatible with the existing and future residential and institutional development in this neighborhood. Development intensity for this Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum of 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor arca. Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall be contingent upon prohibition of issuance of further the first or second year of the Schedule of Capital Improvements. Rczonings arc encouraged to be in the form of a PUD zoning district, which must contain development and design standards to ensure that all commercial uses will be compatible with neighboring residential and institutional uses. In addition to retail uses and other uses permitted in the Plan,financial institutions, business services, and professional and medical offices shall be permitted. Within the 15.88 acre expansion arca,the following land uses shall not be permitted; gas stations, convenience stores with gas pumps,fast food restaurants with drive through lanes, and tire stores. To encourage mixed use projects,this Subdistrict also permits residential development when located in a mixed use building(residential uses over commercial-uses). Such residential development is allowed at a maximum density of 16 dwelling units per acre; the gross acreage of the project is used in calculating residential density. Retail uses shall be limited to single story. Financial services and offices shall be limited to three stories. limited to three stories. Also, mixed use buildings, containing residential uses over commercial uses,shall Subdistrict boundaries for ach foot of building height. Development within each project or yet to be established PUD District shall be required to have common site, signage and building architectural elements. Each project or PUD District shall provide for both pedestrian and vehicular interconnections with abutting properties. Words struck through are deletions;words underlined are additions. 9.Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, consisting of approximately 47.94 acres, comprised of 33.45 acres of land for the existing area and 14.49 acres of land for the expansion area, as depicted on the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map.The intent of the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict is to provide convenient shopping, personal services and employment for neighboring and Golden Gate Estates residential areas, as well as to promote mixed-use development (residential uses over commercial uses).The Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict will reduce driving distances for neighboring and Golden Gate Estates residents, assist in minimizing the road network required, and reduce traffic impacts in this part of Collier County. This Subdistrict is further intended to create a neighborhood focal point and any development within this Subdistrict will be designed in a manner to be compatible with the existing and future residential and institutional development in this neighborhood. To encourage mixed use projects,this Subdistrict also permits residential development when located in a mixed-use building(residential uses over commercial uses).Such residential development is allowed at a maximum density of 16 dwelling units per acre; the gross acreage of the project is used in calculating residential density. Retail uses shall be limited to single-story. Financial services and offices shall be limited to three stories. A combination of these uses in a single building financial services and/or offices over retail uses—shall be limited to three stories.Also, mixed-use buildings,containing residential uses over commercial uses,shall be limited to three stories. All principal buildings shall be set back a minimum of one (1) foot from the Subdistrict boundaries for each foot of building height. Development within each project or yet to be established PUD District shall be required to have common site, signage and building architectural elements. Each project or PUD District shall provide for both pedestrian and vehicular interconnections with abutting properties. Rezonings are encouraged to be in the form of a PUD zoning district, which must contain development and design standards to ensure that all commercial uses will be compatible with neighboring residential and institutional uses. In addition to retail uses and other uses permitted in the Plan,financial institutions, business services, and professional and medical offices shall be permitted. A total of 400,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area is permitted within this Subdistrict. Development intensity for the existing area of this Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum of 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Within the 14.49-acre expansion area, 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area for commercial land uses is permitted. Of the square footage provided, up to 95,550 square feet may be for self-storage facilities. The remainder of the square footage may for retail and office land uses and the following land uses shall not be permitted;gas stations, convenience stores with gas pumps,fast food restaurants with drive-through lanes,and tire stores. Words struck through are deletions;words underlined are additions. DC DAVIDSON r�+r:irrrr v. tir. EXHIBIT "D" LOCATION MAP Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com Z:\Active Projects\V\Vanderbilt Commons\DWGIPlanning\GIS\GM PA\2016-02-04 VC GM PA-EXHIBIT D(LOCATION MAP).mxd IN 1l I ( 1 W���E r C-' (7Th / l S I v \ \\ ___) F 1 ' t VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD Mr— n hi— ______ f cn CC J', U_ O D_ W J D J iiO 03 w GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD W O I ) \ 1 1 n 1 ) ,� LEGEND .— -SUBJECT_PROPERTY MAJOR ROADWAYS ' 0 0.5 SOURCES COLLIER COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS(2016) III ILES ��a - 6 il,, vol. HEND-, PAL EACH 41 lir- illiL., eR0 jr. I, ,,,_ -4 DADE s 4111.41A4. ,, 46 4365 NAPLES, FL 34104AVIDSONRADIO ENGINEERINGROADSUITE, INC.IP VANDERBILT BEACH RD. / COLLIER BLVD. , 201 COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GMPA N DAVNE R Y PHONE: 239-434-6060 EXHIBIT D: LOCATION MAP DE PAYLPsoN EXHIBIT "E" AERIAL LOCATION MAP Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com Z:1Active Projects\V\Vanderbilt Comm ons%DWGWlanninglGIS1GMPA12016-02-04 VC GMPA-EXHIBIT E(AERIAL EXHIBIT).mxd r -. ' 4:::::'':,.".:,-.--;,,,..p* .- • - .. ( '',, Rw .t., ,c ,...... ' , i4 Y q.� ',;% J 4}ii,-7 t, 1 ' _ A�rE� `�" ;;;--:";;:;,-.,".=7„,i'=- �Y 3'� `W .»xi ' J`:'1; "r� iti lir kV 't ...tell ' . ISI Y I I 5 , -_. K tf ) - • . li I' �` g � ( • 110.4.14 1 ' --.,,'''' -0'1. - .-' .0.'':110;‘.4irr. -''' ' .:. 'Z' ; ', ''''...lit'"". '. iirjr a * s. ts. /. illrit* ' : , .. ' .14.. 0,,1 - ''?'4'' '3"k;:k.; ' - , '';',-- ‘r .r,:" S_am• illt �Ylig ii +¢ `VTBACH`RD ,, AE ., . .. ry v '�' •a r � .�.< z � �:�ro� .*n�!i�q v ;i , ti, t < 1 .rrw� ' :�a.r+R• z �. � ' `i..: ;i .,. 4 .. ....:7.,. {�y'b 5 4 X.. ', o 4 i m oc J uj ,Tr V v LEGEND � ' R p OVANDERBILT BEACH RD./COLLIER BLVD. t'- COMM COMM.SUBDISTRICT(1588AC EXP AREA) , _ 5 . "` --„.-,r .K ..-. = fi 600 w` -,,,..- 'i1)200 . . FEET SQURGES: U INFORMATION C DE4365 DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC. VANDERBILT BEACH RD. / COLLIER BLVD. RADIO ROAD,SUITE 201 COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GMPA NAPLES, FL 34104 DAVIDSON PHONE: 239-434-6060 E N G I N E E R I N G EXHIBIT E: AERIAL EXHIBIT BE DAVIDSON FNGINfFe�NC• EXHIBIT "F" Aerial Plan w/ Florida Land Cover Classification System Overlay Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com Z • � y o a + �' 3 ti"1> fl w Q w Q g T tis r a a fr4 .1 O o U ii t- ' 270 a ° 1 r*;irw• .,..,mom'..:,�.....,, — t... 2 a � Z N O 4 \ til : LPI i. U U _ v A J m U CN O J r , a w \J ~ x "C3 O a wD LL cdcd �� zCO 0 o o O Ct J a 0 '703a z0_0 w w a rtM w O o Ln 0 w cr in w J N Cd o 1-a - p--..., - . N Z • r Q ., . ,,,4 st . -- 4 ,,,,,ip,,, . , ,... , , , ,,,, ,„.. :, �yC w 1. ..., .. .., , ,, , ,�, ,„ , 171;4' ' -1''' a« 4 .r. , .,; ...t. '-'. ' 441 4; It4'4 i ' iii o m w of r 0 N k m Z IP* "'''' -' '''''''s 3A( O �NIISI2�d "� 0 � a W K 0 ,. r. >- z ` o 4. "11* NCk4:44111171 ti: 4 ';''�'. a d z Z VI , *.k.'” „ e 3: ' 5.'" : D W V2 z ,y, '�" IIA £ cn U v A " y - L N V] a V, ;tea. ` _ 2ci_ >. _ sn r c o C, { as w -.. . , m ` �" O + >. .';.�,,• yxx.Asx -ems`• k: N ti U (/] a a ,, Z in I'kk,* '.. --.s 'ci (.4,,.i 0 I i Y CI # a ~~ X CA Q CA 1 U I a 0 r =l. K1 4 h Fy O V LiJ . "ip ___ fir# e. �-Qw i Z LU L11 J V w z= .iz w z a t - f it „ y# y 1 .',,f'g -,,,, 1 * 1 ,.:,,,t, v A- i+ ,,,, , ; rel f ,t # dittP 4 Ce Itilt 03 0 75 O O n -- w O 3AIHO _3NI_LSI2jd .a +5y F Z Z is ;� I!•F< ''r a 2 LL CO U .j r� 4 o a .. , aS.. f O �W} m 0 _ "i - s { 4 ti --+-„`. f i OU) XTD' ,.=44,N 7V' " -, Vy DE DAVIDSON ENGINEERING EXHIBIT "G" POTENTIAL LISTED SPECIES TABLE Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com Exhibit"G"- Potential Listed Species Table VANDERBILT COMMONS Florida Land Use Cover&Forms Classification System(FLUCCS)habitats present on site: FLUCCS 193 FLUCCS 411-E2 FLUCCS 500 The following is a composite table that contains the names of the protected species which have the highest probability of occurring in each onsite FLUCCS community: FLUCCS Potential Listed Species Scientific Name Designated Status FWC or FWS FDA 193 NONE NONE - - 411 Beautiful Pawpaw Deeringothamnus pulchellus E E Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia T - Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais couperi T T Fakahatchee Burmannia Burmannia flava E - Florida Black Bear Ursus americanus floridanus T - Florida Coontie Zamia lloridana C - Florida Panther Felis concolor coryi E E Gopher Frog Rana capito SSC - Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus SSC - Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis T E Satinleaf Chrysophyllum oliviforme E - Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus T - Twisted Air Plant Tillandsia flexousa E - 500 American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis SSC T(S/A) Everglades Mink Mustela vison evergladensis T - Limpkin Aramus guarauna SSC - Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea SSC - Reddish Egret Egretta rufescens SSC - Roseate Spoonbill Ajaia ajaja SSC - Snowy Egret Egretta thula SSC - Tricolored Heron Egretta tricolor SSC - The list of animals and birds was obtained from the FWC publication "Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species&Species of Special Concern-Official Lists",Publication Date:January 2013. The list of protected plant species was obtained from the publication"Notes on Florida's Endangered and Threatened Plants",Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services,Division of Plant Industry, Bureau of Entomology,Nematology&Plant Pathology-Botany Section,Contribution 38,5th Edition-2010). 1 DE DAVIDSN ENGINCEAINOG EXHIBIT "H" SURROUNDING ZONING DISTRICTS MAP Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com Z:\Active Projects\V\Vanderbilt Commons IDWG\Planning\GISIGMPA12016-02-04 VC GM PA-EXHIBIT H(ZONING EXHIBIT).mxd MPUD W_ 1 — E • lz MPUD I <. RPUD RPUD MPUD v. MPUD G :VANDERBILToor, a 4%w k5 \ t: 0 LEGEND E CO r VANDERBILT BEACH RD./COLLIER BLVD. eJ '. COMM.SUBDISTRICT(15.88AC.EXP.AREA) ZONING DISTRICTS J =I A-AGRICULTURAL 0 E-ESTATES U -PUD-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT -RPUD-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - MPUD-MIXED TUSE PLANNED UNIT 0 600 1,200 FEET SOURCES:COLLIER COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS(2016) • DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC. VANDERBILT BEACH RD. / COLLIER BLVD. DE4365 RADIO ROAD,SUITE 201 COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GMPA NAPLES, FL 34104 DNAVG I N E IDE R R I N G PHONE: 239-434-6060 EXHIBIT H: SURROUNDING ZONING DISTRICTS E DE DAVIDSRINON FNGINEf EXHIBIT "I" SURROUNDING FUTURE LAND DESIGNATIONS MAP Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com Z:\Active Projects\V\Vanderbilt Commons\DWG\Planning\GIS\GMPA\2016-02-04 VC OMPA-EXHIBIT I(FLUE EXHIBIT).mxd 7 • r„ _ Q _. :t44 . . �� fJ ,,. ' � fix.= 44, -: ,_- „,„,,,i.. 'd$,..6'i....'..F..;t4i '', ' '. °—'-'-'4.',' !' VSub i 1 1 I ` s I VANDERBILT BEACH[> 0 ce w J m som LEGEND 0 �r VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD/COLLIER '2 BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT r (15.88 ACRE EXPANSION AREA) -ES-ESTATES DISTRICT UR-URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT -VSub-VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD/COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT €. 0 600 vectir ( 7 :Z(o j GEOGRAPHIC o o ' Six DENAPLES DAVIDSONENGINEERING, INC. VANDERBILT BEACH RD. / COLLIER BLVD. 4365 RADIO ROAD,SUITE 201 COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GMPA ,FL 34104 DAV!--?SON PHONE: 239-434-6060 EXHIBIT I: SURROUNDING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS DE DAVI9 qt ENGIN FF RING EXHIBIT "J" HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROBABILITY Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com Exhibit"J" - Historical/Archaeological Probability /Th,, This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a STOP project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master \ ` Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333 for project review information. October 14, 2015 Florida Master Jessica Harrelson Siteep File Project Coordinator Davidson Engineering 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (239)434-6060 Email:jessica@davidsonengineering.com In response to your inquiry of October 14, 2015, the Florida Master Site File lists no previously recorded cultural resources in the following parcels of Collier County: Parcel#25525600520 Parcel#25525600041 Parcel#25525600546 Parcel#25525600067 Parcel#25525600562 Parcel #25525600083 Parcel#25525600588 Parcel#25525600096 When interpreting the results of this search,please consider the following information: • This search area may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, historical structures or other resources even if previously surveyed for cultural resources. • Federal, state and local laws require formal environmental review for most projects. This search DOES NOT constitute such a review. If your project falls under these laws,you should contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the results of this search. Sincerely, 4 /i Paige Phillips Archaeological Data Analyst Florida Master Site File Paige.Phillips@dos.myflorida.com 500 South Bronough Street• Tallahassee,FL 32399-0250 • www.flheritage.com/preservation/sitefile 850.245.6440 ph I 850.245.6439 fax I SiteFile@dos.state.fl.us DE DAVIDSON E NG IN f ERING EXHIBIT "K" PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC SERVICES MAP Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com Z:1Active Projects\V1Vanderbilt Commons\DWGIPIanning\GIS\GMPA\2016-02-04 VC GMPA-EXHIBIT K(PUBLIC SERVICES MAP).mxd N 0 1 2 1 MILES W—0,,. `•- E 3 MILES ' -S i �• North Naples Fire and Rescue.Station 42 2 MILES ', 7010 I kalee Road IMMOKALEE RD/CR•846 IMMOKALEE RDICR 846 1 : :Gulf Coast-High School / 7878 Shark Way Laurel Oak/Elementary ` / 7800 Immokalee Road :Oak Ridge-Middle School / a € 14975 Collier Boulevard m ` m 1 MILE) % % 1\0‹ % 1 Golden Gate Fire and Rescue Station 0 I 14575 Collier Boulevard 1 1 i VANDERBILT BEACH RR= ' 1 �ineyards-Elementary c1 6225 Arbor Boulez and W 1 o ; 1 h z I / GOLDEN GATE BLVD / % m o Golden Gate Fire and Rescue Station 42 ` W J Big Cypress-Elementary School 95 13th Street SW �\ m 3520 Golden Gate Boulevard W ii .(7.7C13%\ . 0 — / I— a)CC / w ca N• C / (Z I— : o n O PINE RIDGE RD WHITE BLVD Cl) i + z M 1 Physicians Regional Hospital I M IY if 6101 Pine Ridge Road /COI Co co 0 `` o 00 cc co zz cc li `GRE BL , VD ----� � � �'' `s1 16TH AVE.SW H zm LEGEND 'I W O SUBJECT PROPERTY Golden Gate-Elementary: _, I�RADIUS RINGS f 4911 20th Place SW 0 r Schools CCSO_Golden.Gate Substation-Dist.2 * COLLIER COUNTY SHERRIFF FACILITY _Golden Gate Fire.and.Rescue Station 70i010<707 Golden Gate Parkway 0 Hospital 4741 Golden Gate Parkway/ Golden Terrae North-Elementary + Medical 0 I A .; I O COLLIER COUNTY FIRE STATION ,a CR 886/GOLDEN GATE Golden Gate-Middle School Golden Terrace South-Elementary O(— r 2965 44th Terrace SW FIRE DISTRICT 27011 48th Terrace SW Q "�; Big Corkscrew Fire I I City of Naples Fire O Oa0 j !Y r East Naples Fire Mike Davis-Elementary I Golden Gate Fire Golden.Gate High School 3215 Magnolia Pond Drive 2925 Titan Way�5� North Naples Fire CO SOURCES:COLLIER COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS(2016) ! SR 9 �5 ,..---, DE4365 DAVIDSONENGINEERING, INC. VANDERBILT BEACH RD. / COLLIER BLVD. RADIO ROAD,SUITE 201 NCOMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GMPA NAPLES,FL 34104 DAVNDSON PHONE: 239-434-6060 EXHIBIT K: PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC SERVICES DC DAVIDSON ENGINEERING EXHIBIT "L" RECORDED WARRANTY DEED Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com INSTR 5079958 OR 5117 PG 1288 RECORDED 2/3/2015 11:22 AM PAGES 4 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $30,100.00 REC $35.50 CONS $4,300,000.00 Exhibit"L" - Recorded Warranty Deed This instrument was prepared by without opinion of title and after recording return 10' Gregory L.Urbancic,Esq. Coleman,Yovanovich&Koester P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North Suite 300 Naples,FL 34103 (239)435-3535 [Space Above This Line For Recording Data] Special Warranty Deed THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED is ' I4 s -day January,2015 between FLP 7205,LLC,a Florida limited liability company, whQs $( �'lt -`. jse;Ai '.O. Box 492, Alpena, MI 49707, as grantor(hereinafter referred to as"94110r" nd VANDE' 011:..6 S MMONS,LLC,a Florida limited liability company, whose post ocjress is 2400 9111 Streel'., ite #101, Naples, FL 34103, as grantee(hereinafter referred to as` `Gr tee''). -�` 6 l (Whenever used herein - iG . ' " '-" -•E Jude;all the parties to this instrument and the h?irs,( 41 pr se to i e- of\individuals, and the successors and assignstof c s •(rat• ,t 's • •' ruste).) 1-4} Witnesseth,that Grantor,for ar ▪ onsideration.of the s • of N N0/100 DOLLARS($10.00) and other good and valuable co • bons to said Grants- d 15y Grantee,the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has gra gained, and sold o Cep and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever,the following described lan sdf�q lying and beim County,Florida to-wit: Parcel A: L ` Units 1, 2, 3, and 4, CAROLINA COMMONS LAND CONDOMINIUM, a Condominium, according to the Declaration of Condominium as recorded in Official Records Book 4246, Page 3729, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida,as subsequently amended from time to time. Parcel B: Tract 2 of CAROLINA COMMONS, as per plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 48,Page 78,of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida. Parcel Identification Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588 and 25525600041. Subject to: real estate taxes and assessments for the year 2015 and subsequent years; covenants, restrictions and public utility easements common to the subdivision and/or condominium; outstanding oil,gas and mineral interest of record; existing zoning and governmental regulations and subject to those matters set forth on Exhibit"A"without the intent to reimpose the same. Special Warranty Deed - 1 - 1 OR 5117 PG 1289 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. And, Grantor hereby covenants with Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by,through or under Grantor. In Witness Whereof, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed,sealed and delivered in our presence: FLP 7205,LLC, a Florida limited liability company VW' E LITA 'ro.� ies,LLC, /A/ {� a Flo d !b' ty co D. A its M. ttj IJ itness •,1: I __ --- ! Wi ness •2: rtgo'+ C. i •r, anager \\'' t"� 0 State of Florida to County of Collier °A0('' ,. The foregoing instrument was acknowle le er day of January, 2015 by Gregory C. Winter,as Manager of Maple Ridge Properties,LLC,a Florida limited liability company,the Manager of FLP 7205, Lye; a Florida limited liability company, on behalf of said entity, who L]is personally known or has produced a driver's license as identification. l MONICA JOHNSON 04A.a 2}/21z<1410)1 [Notary Sem• MY COMMISSION#EE187785 No Public - "`: 4. EXPIRES AprI 09,2018 • 1'., Printed Name: 'Y/� 0 l l CQ j".ahnson(407)39&0153 ftarid4NdarSini00Cartt My Commission Expires: 4. Q-�(o Special Warranty Deed -2- 2 OR 5117 PG 1290 Exhibit "A" PERMITTED TITLE EXCEPTIONS 1. Taxes and assessments for 2015 and thereafter which are not yet due and payable. 2. Oil, gas and mineral reservations as contained in those certain instruments recorded in Deed Book 30, Page 91 and Deed Book 34, Page 286, both of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The right of entry for the mineral reservation has not been released. 3. Easements, restrictions, covenants, conditions and other matters as shown on plat of Carolina Commons, as recorded in Plat Book 48,Page 78,as amended by partial vacation per Resolution No. 07-269, as recorded in Official Records Book 4286,Page 1092,both of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida. , 4. Declaration of Covenants, •.f.'1.e ' _ ••.• for Carolina Commons, and all exhibits attached thereto : •• •ed 4051, Pale 'as amended in Official Records Book 4100, Page 167i( •: • of the Public Reco of.Collier County, Florida, as subsequently amended o4t -.__.,. \ t 5. Assignment of Decl t am ''.11•":1 •t"''wt : •+'�� ,, Inc, as recorded in Official Records Book 4100,1 P•.;e 68 : •• yy•-. 1,7f tq Carolina Commons Owner's Association, Inc. byt: •.• •: ,, •In •ffi •. '• Book 4246, Page 3817, both of the Public R-•.i •• of Collier County, '. •rida )', 6. Collier County Ordinan 75-20,regulating - • - ation of any water distribution and wastewater collectlo '•-• or part thereatitla f nin any public right-of-way or easement recorded May 19, 475 • 6 'rr eoo� Book 619, Pages 1177 to 1181, inclusive,of the Public Records o -•i .•••• ,Plorida. 7. Collier County Ordinance No. 75-21, protecting certain trees within Collier County . recorded May 19, 1975 in Official Records Book 619,Pages 1182 to 1190,inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida. 8. Collier County Ordinance No. 75-24, zoning ordinance for the Coastal Area Planning District recorded May 19, 1975 in Official Records Book 619, Pages 1191 to 1381, inclusive of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida. 9. Final Order establishing and confirming Collier County Water Management District Number Seven dated and recorded August 12, 1968,in Official Records Book 282, Page 976,of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida. 10.Resolution establishing the Immokalee Area Planning District and the Coastal Area Planning District and declaring the intent of the Board of County Commissioners to enact a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance for the Coastal Area Planning District of Collier 3 *** OR 5117 PG 1291 *** County recorded May 6, 1976 in Official Records Book 649,Page 1239 and 1240,of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida. 11.Construction, Maintenance and Easement Agreement regarding Loop Road, as recorded in Official Records Book 3573, Page 751, and Assignment of Cost Sharing Agreement, as recorded in Official Records Book 3797, Page 2118, both of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida. 12.Cost Sharing Agreement for the Development of a Shared Access Road, as recorded in Official Records Book 3635,Page 1672, and Assignment of Cost Sharing Agreement, as recorded in Official Records Book 3797, Page 2115, both of the Public Records of Collier County,Florida. 13.Drainage Easement granted to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,as the Governing body of 'n •d as ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier Water-Sewer a' :` .+� . cial Records Book 4865,Page 2237,of the Public Reco • S er County,F' eO A - 14.Declaration of Condoof 1i a e • :Ceit thions L C1dominium,and all exhibits attached thereto, as co t; 6,Page 3729,as subsequently amended from time ••• . 1 15.Assignment of D n i_• s of; ••• •ns Land Condominium Association, Inc., as •• .ed in Official Re • BV.V.:•,Page 3822, of the Public Records of Collier Co i'•. 4orida. 'i` V , '16.The followingencroachm - w_n_in_ � survey prepared byRhodes & Rhodes Land Surveying,Inc.dat4iNifil and known as File Number 2013-438: i. Encroachment of asphalt into 10'public utility easement and 10'landscape buffer easement; ii. Encroachment of curb into 20'landscape buffer easement; iii. Encroachment of flumes into drainage easements on East and West sides of Parcel B;and iv. Encroachment of drainage easements into Units 1 and 4 of Carolina Commons Land Condominium. SACGents\Cioffi,RaiphlFLP 7205'Permitted Title Exceptions 4 we.000 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Division of Corporations July 29, 2015 CORPORATE ACCESS The Articles of Incorporation for VANDERBILT COMMONS OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC. were filed on July 29, 2015 and assigned document number N15000007405, Please refer to this number whenever corresponding with this office regarding the above corporation. PLEASE NOTE: Compliance with the following procedures is essential to maintaining your corporate status. Failure to do so may result in dissolution of your corporation. To maintain "active" status with the Division of Corporations, an annual report must be filed yearly between January 1st and May 1st beginning in the year following the filedate or effective date indicated above. It is your responsibility to remember to file your annual report in a timely manner, A Federal Employer Identification Number (FEI/EIN)will be required when this report is filed. Apply today with the IRS online at: https://sa.www4.irs,gov/modiein/individuaVindex.jsp. Should your corporate mailing address change, you must notify this office in writing, to insure Important mailings such as the annual report notices reach you. Should you have any questions regarding corporations, please contact this office at (850)245-6052. Terri J Schroeder, Regulatory Specialist II New Filing Section Letter Number: 315A00015968 www.sunbiz.org Division of Corporations - P.O. BOX 6327 -Tallahassee, Florida 32314 5 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF cm rti VANDERBILT COMMONS OWNERS' ASSOCIATION,INC. r- m .17.? The undersigned hereby executes and submits these Articles of Incorporation as o6thaID1-14 day and year set forth hereinbelow for the purpose of forming the corporation pursugt to? Chapter 617, Florida Statutes. •;:7 *. C) ARTICLE I Corporate Name 1.1 Name. The name of the corporation is Vanderbilt Commons Owners' Association, Inc., hereinafter called the "Association". For convenience, these Articles of Incorporation shall be referred to herein as the"Articles", and the By-Laws of the Association as the"By-Laws". ARTICLE II Address 2.1 Address. The initial mailing address of the Association shall be 2950 9th Street North, Naples, Florida 34103. The principal office of the Association shall bc located at the mailing address or at such other place as may be subsequently desi .ted by the Board of Directors of the Association from time to time. ARTICLE III Purpose and Powers of the Association 3.1 Objects and Purposes. The objects and purposes of the Association are those objects and purposes as are authorized by the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Vanderbilt Commons recorded (or to be recorded) in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, as hereafter amended and/or supplemented from time to time (the "Declaration"). The further objects and purposes of the Association are to preserve the values and amenities within Vanderbilt Commons, as the same are defined in the Declaration, and to maintain the Common Area and any portions of the Property as set forth in the Declaration for the benefit of the Members of the Association. Defined terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Declaration. 3.2 Not for Profit. The Association is not organized for profit and no part of the net earnings, if any, shall inure to the benefit of any Member or individual person, firm or corporation. Upon dissolution, all assets of the Association shall be transferred only to another not-for-profit corporation or as otherwise authorized by the Florida not-for-profit corporation statute. 3.3 Powers. The powers of the Association shall include and be governed by the fol lowing: 6 ••-••N (a) General. The Association shall have all of the common iaw and statutory powers of a corporation not-for-profit under the Laws of Florida unless further restricted by the provisions of these Articles, the Declaration, or the By-Laws; and (b) Enumeration. The Association shall have the powers and duties set forth in subsection (a) above, except as limited by these Articles, the By-Laws and the Declaration, and all of the powers and duties reasonably necessary to operate the Association pursuant to the Declaration, and as more particularly described in the By-Laws, as they may be amended from time to time, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) To make and collect Assessments and other charges against Members and Owners, and to use the proceeds thereof in the exercise of its powers and duties; (ii) To buy, own, operate, lease and sell, both real and personal property; (iii) To maintain, repair, replace, reconstruct, add to and operate the Common Area, arid portions of the Property as set forth in the Declaration; (iv) To purchase insurance upon the Common Area and insurance for the protection of the Association,its officers, directors and Members; (v) To make and amend reasonable rules and regulations for the maintenance, conservation and use of the Common Area and Lots and for the nealth, comfort, safety and welfare of the Members as provided in the Declaration; (vi) To enforce by legal means the provisions of the Declaration, these Articles, the By-Laws, and the Rules and Regulations for the use of the Common Area and the Lots; (vii) To contract for the management and maintenance of the Common Area and to authorize a management agent to assist the Association in carrying out its powers and duties by performing such functions as the submission of proposals, collection of Assessments, preparation of records, enforcement of rules and maintenance, repair and replacement of the Common Area with such funds as shall be made available by the Association for such purposes. The Association and its officers shall, however, retain at all times the powers and duties granted by the Declaration, By-Laws and these Articles, including, buc not limited to, the making of Assessments, promulgation of rules and execution of contracts on behalf of the Association; (viii) To employ personnel to perform the services required for.1be proper operation, maintenance, conservation, and use of the Common Area: eery; e— ire e) rr -o cz c- :r 3-1 C4 ca 7 (ix) To borrow money, and with the unanimous consent of the members entitled to vote, mortgage, pledge, deed in trust, or hypothecate any oi all of its real or personal property as security for money borrowed or debts incurred; (x) To dedicate,sell or transfer all or any part of the Common Area to any public agency, authority, or utility for such purposes and subject to such conditions as may be agreed to by the members; (xi) To maintain and operate any roads and streets, sewer and/or potable water facilities and the surface/stormwater management system and related appurtenances, including, but not limited to, all lakes, retention areas, swales, culverts and drainage structures in accordance with any permit issued by the South Florida Water Management District, or its successor; (xii) To sue and be sued; and (xiii) To contract for services necessary to operate and maintain the surface/stormwater management system and other property (tracts and easements) dedicated to the Association, and any corresponding infrastructure. All funds and the title to all property acquired by the Association shall be held for th.% benefit of the Members in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration, these Articl.,..7",. antig; the By-Laws. c— La ARTICLE IV IV ro Meinbership/Voling Rights 4.1 Qualification. The qualification of Members,the manner of their admission td the termination termination of membership,arid voting by members shall be as follows: 5fr (a) Every Owner of a Lot shall be a Member of the Association. Each Member shall be entitled to such votes and have such a voting interest as provided and allocated pursuant to these Articles and Section 6.5(a) of the Declaration, as calculated in accordance with the schedule of Gross Area Calculations set forth in Exhibit "D" attached thereto, all as the same may be subsequently amended from time to time. In the event a Lot is subdivided and a Sub- Association is created, the Sub-Association therefor shall be the applicable Member of the Association. Membership in the Association shall not be assignable, except to the successor of the Owner's Lot, as the case may be, and every membership of an Owner or Sub-Association in the Association shall be appurtenant to and inseparable from ownership of the Lot. Membership in the Association shall not be transferred, pledged or alienated in any way, except upon the sale of the Lot to which such membership is appurtenant, and then only to the purchaser of such Lot, and, upon the sale of a Lot, the seller's membership in the Association shall terminate as to such Lot. Any purported transfer of membership in the Association to any transferee not permitted under this Article shall be null and void. Recordation of a deed to a Lot shall be the act which transfers membership in the Association. This prohibition shall not otherwise restrict n Owner from delegating its voting rights or granting proxies. 3 8 (b) Except as otherwise provided in this Declaration, the Articles, the By-Laws or applicable Laws,all matters requiring the approval of the Members shall be deemed approved by one of the following methods: (i)if approved unanimously by the voting interest of the Members of the Association in writing; or (ii) if approved by a Majority of the Members at any duly called regular or special meeting of the Members at which a quorum is present, either in person or by proxy. (c) For purposes of this Article, if a Lot consists of a Sub-Association,then the votes allocated to such Lot shall be exercised by a voting representative appointed annually by the applicable Sub-Association ("Voting Representative"), on behalf of such Sub-Association, and in accordance with the governing documents and instructions of the board of directors of such Sub- Association. Upon the casting of votes by the Voting Representative of a Sub-Association, it will thereafter be conclusively presumed for all purposes that he or she acted with the authority and consent of the board of directors of such Sub-Association. (d) The interest of a Member in the funds and assets of the Association cannot be assigned, hypothecated or transferred in any manner, except as an appurtenance to the Lot owned by such member. The funds and assets of the Association shall be expended, held or used only for the benefit of the membership and for the purposes authorized herein, in the Declaration,and in the By-Laws. ARTICLE V Liability for Debts 5.1 Debts. Neither the Members nor the officers or the directors of the Association shall be liable for the debts of the Association. ARTICLE VI Board of Directors 6.1 Number of Directors/Initial Directors. The affairs of this Association shall be managed and governed by a Board of Directors consisting of at least three (3) Directors, who need not be Members of the Association. The number of Directors may be changed by amendment of the By-Laws of the Association. The names and addresses of the persons who are to act in the capacity of Directors until the selection of their successor are: Name Address Ralph R. Cioffi,Jr. 2950 9th Street North, Naples,Florida 34103 Ln (Art, c_ r-sin c -4= r— rn Dan Smith 2950 9th Street North,Naples,Florida 34103 Fred Benoit 2950 9th Street North,Naples,Florida 34103 Z3 CI C- "r1 Ce? C:) 4 9 6.2 Election/Removal. Directors of the Association shall be elected by the Members in the manner determined by the By-Laws. Directors may be removed and vacancies of the Board of Directors shall be filled in the manner provided by the By-Laws. ARTICLE VII Officers 7.1 Officers. The affairs of the Association shall be administered by a President, a Vice President, a Secretary and a Treasurer and such other Officers as may be designated from time to time by the Directors. The Officers shall be elected or designated by the Board of Directors at its first meeting following the annual meeting of the Members of the Association, The names and addresses of the Officers who shall serve until their successors are elected or designated by the Board of Directors are as follows: . 1 C I President Ralph R. Cioffi,Jr. cfl r—Vice President President George Vukobraiovich Po -17> J3 F Secretary Fred Benoit Treasurer Dan Smith CD C3 ARTICLE Viii VIII Indemnification 8.1 Indemnity. The Association shall indemnify any officer, director, or committee member who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending, or contemplated action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, or committee member of the Association, against expenses (including attorney's fees and appellate attorney's fees), judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit, or proceeding, unless; (i) a court of competent jurisdiction finally determines, after all appeals have been exhausted or not pursued by the proposed indemnitee, that he did not act in good faith or in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of the Association, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, that he had reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful; and (ii) such cowl also determines specifically that indemnification should be denied. The termination of any action, suit, or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interest of the Association, and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful, It is the intent of the Association, by the adoption of this provision, to provide the most comprehensive indemnification possible to its officers, directors, and committee members as permitted by Florida law. 5 10 8.2 Expenses, To the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of the Association has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in Section 8.1 above, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, he shall be indemnified against expenses(including attorney's fees and appellate attorney's fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection therewith. Assessments may be made by the Association to cover any expenses or other amounts to be paid by the Association in connection with the indemnification provided herein. 8.3 Approval. Any indemnification under Section 8.1 above (unless ordered by a court) shall be made by the Association only as authorized in the specific case upon a reasonable determination that indemnification of the director, officer, employee, committee member or agent is proper in the circumstances because he has met the applicable standard of conduct set forth in Section 8.1 above. Such determination shall be made (a)by the Board of Directors by a majority vote of a quorum consisting of Directors who were not parties to such action, suit or proceeding, or (b) if such quorum is not obtainable, or, even if obtainable a quorum of disinterested directors so directs, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or (c) by a majority of the Members. 8.4 Advances. Expenses incurred in defending a civil or criminal action, suit or proceeding may be paid by the Association in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding as authorized by the Board of Directors in the specific case upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director, officer, employee, committee member or agent to repay such amount unless it shall ultimately be determined that he or she is entitled to be indemnified by the Association as authorized in this Article. 8.5 Miscellaneous. The indemnification provided by this Article shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification may be entitled under any by-law,agreement, vote of Members or otherwise, both as to action in his official capacity while holding such office or position, or otherwise, and shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be director, officer, employee, committee member or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs,executors and administrators of such person. 8.6 Insurance. The Association shall have the power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, committee member or agent of the Association, or is or was serving at the request of the Association as a director, officer,employee, committee member or agent of another corporation, partnership,joint venture,trust or other enterprise, against any liability asserted against him and incurred by him in any such capacity, or arising out of his status as such, whether or not the Association would have the power to indemnify him against such liability under the provisions of this Anile. 8.7 Amendment. Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, the provisions of this Article may not be amended without the prior written consent of all persons whose intst would be adversely affected by such amendment. c_ ‘13 z 9 •;.-3 6 7-3 11 8.8 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, all terms used in these Articles shall have the same meaning as are attributed to them in the Master Declaration and the By-Laws. ARTICLE IX By-Laws 9.1 By-Laws. The By-Laws of the Association shall be adopted oy the Board of Directors and may be altered, amended or rescinded as provided therein; provided, hovvever, that at no time shall the By-Laws conflict with these Articles of Incorporation or the Declaration. ARTICLE X Dissolution 10.1 Dissolution. The Association may be dissolved upon written assent signed by unanimous consent of the Members. Upon dissolution of the Association, other than incident to a merger or consolidation, the assets of the Association(including, without limitation, the surface water management system) shall be dedicated to an appropriate public agency to be used for purposes similar to those for which this Association was created. In the event that such dedication is refused acceptance, such assets shall be granted, conveyed and assigned to any nonprofit corporation, association, trust or organization to be devoted to such similar purposes. ARTICLE XI < - .- T. cn çri Term F 1/.1 Term. The term of the Association shall be perpetual. fb4.3 '441 nCF ARTICLE XII XII Amendments 12,1 Amendment Process. Amendments to these Articles shall be propose and adopted in the following manner: (a) Proposal. Amendments to these Articles may be proposed by a majority of the Board of Directors or upon petition by a Member, in writing, signed by them. (b) Procedure. Upon any amendment or amendments to these Articles being proposed by said Board or Member, such proposed amendment or amendments shall be submitted to a vote of the Members not later than the next annual meeting for which proper notice can be given. (c) Vote Required. Except as otherwise required for by Florida law, these Articles of Incorporation may be amended by the unanimous vote of the voting interests of the Members at any annual or special meeting, or by the unanimous approval in writing of the voting interests of the Members without a meeting. Notice of any proposed amendment shall be given 7 12 to the Members of the Association and that the notice contains a fair statement of the proposed amendment. 122 Effective Date. An amendment shall become effective upon filing with the Secretary of State and recording a certified copy in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 12.3 Limit on Amendments. No amendment shall make any changes in the qualifications for membership; or in the voting rights of Members, without approval in writing by all Members. ARTICLE XIII Incorporator The name and address of the incorporator of these Articles of Incorporation is as follows: Kevin A. Denti, Esquire 2180 Immokalee Road—Suite#316 Naples, Florida 34110 ARTICLE XIV Registered Office and Agent The street address of the initial registered office of this corporation is 2180 Immokalee Road — Suite #316, Naples, Florida 34110, and the name of the initial registered agent of this corporation is Kevin A. Denti,Esquire of Kevin A.Denti,PA. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the subscriber, being the undersigned person, named as incorporator,has hereunto set his/her hand and seal,this i f-"day of 1,4.r ,2015. Ta Kevin A. Denti,Esquire,Incorporator MI -ri>_, ‘G ,31 rr • v,. a O r 8 13 ACCEPTANCE OF DESIGNATION AS REGISTERED AGENT Having been named as registered agent to accept service of process for the above stated corporation, at the place designated in the certificate, I am familiar with and accept the appointment as registered agent and agree to act in this capacity. Kevin A. Denti,Esquire,Registered Agent — _L L..n corer.). mc,r- ca, ' S C1ientsWanderbilt CommottslArtides of Lncorponcton 9 14 ixocx11k5 N (Requestors Name) Our (Address) 600276680496 (Address) r—TY\42.,,f-FsC_JILD (City/State/Zip/Phone#) ((19/03/15--1:11001--006 *125.00 0 PICK-UP El WAIT ❑ MAIL 09/08/15--01001--U11 **15.00 (Business Entity Name) (Document Number) Certified Copies Certificates of Status Special Instructions to Filing Officer; Y'ry rn Office Use Only -i • ha r s.aP c, r-, r`n' C3 au 4 15 • CORPORATE When you need ACCESS to the world R ACCESS, �` yr INC. 236 East 6th Avenue.Tallahassee, Florida 32303 efr 4.. .P.O. Box 37066(32315-7066) -- (850)222-2666 or(800)969-1666. Fax(850)222-1666 • WALK IN \ 1 PICK UP: q/q// '"11' ❑ CERTIFIED COPY IX) PHOTOCOPY ❑ CUS FILING i ri,e1 1. t pgVirvL torear,.•ivs P_x& a 6 Ss c.,;-‘47" e _ L. (CORPORATE NAME AND DOCUMENT#) 2. (CORPORATE NAME AND DOCUMENT#) (CORPORATE NAME AND DOCUMENT#) 4. (CORPORATE NAME AND DOCUMENT#) 5. (CORPORATE NAME AND DOCUMENT#) 6. (CORPORATE NAME AND DOCUMENT#) SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: • 16 • ARTICLES OF MERGER FILED 2015 SEP —14 P1 3 20 The following Articles of Merger are being submitted in accordance with section 617.1105, Florida Statutes: ::. ::,;`,:�Y �_� ;i LATE. 1'ti.,/,41ASSEE. FLORIDA FIRST: The names and addresses of the corporations which are merging are as follows: Carolina Commons Owners' Association, Inc. 2950 9th Street North Naples, Florida 34103 Vanderbilt Commons Owners' Association, Inc. 2950 9th Street North Naples, Florida 34103 SECOND: The name and address of the surviving corporation is as follows: Vanderbilt Commons Owners' Association, Inc. 2950 9th Street North Naples, Florida 34103 THIRD: The Plan of Merger attached hereto meets the requirements of Section 617.1101, Florida Statutes,as the members of each corporation which is a party hereto are not entitled to vote on a Plan of Merger,and the Plan of Merger was unanimously adopted and approved by all three(3) of the members of the Board of Directors of each corporation that is a party to the merger on September 1,2015. FOURTH: The effective date of the merger shall be the date of filing ofthese Articles of Merger. CARLOLINA COMMONS' OWNERS' VANDERBILT COMMONS' OWNERS' ASSOCIATION,INC., a Florida ASSOCIATION, INC.,a Florida not-for-profit corporation not-for-profit corporation B . . �. . Bye , , • RalP R. Cioffi, • 't ent Ralph R. Ceiofre?de` nt S\Clients\Vanderbilt Commons\Articles of Merger 1 17 ' PLAN OF MERGER The following Plan of Merger has been adopted and approved by each party to the merger in accordance with Section 617.1101, Florida Statutes: FIRST: The names of the corporations which are merging are as follows: Carolina Commons Owners' Association, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, and Vanderbilt Commons Owners' Association, Inc.,a Florida not-for-profit corporation. SECOND: The name of the surviving corporation is as follows: Vanderbilt Commons Owners' Association, Inc.,a Florida not-for-profit corporation. THIRD: The terms and conditions of the merger are as follows: Carolina Commons Owners' Association, Inc. shall be merged with and into Vanderbilt Commons Owners' Association, Inc. The existence of Carolina Commons Owners' Association, Inc. shall cease upon the filing of this Plan of Merger. FOURTH: The Articles of Incorporation of the surviving corporation shall be affected by the merger as follows: The Articles of Incorporation of Vanderbilt Commons Owners' Association,Inc.as now in force and effect shall be the Articles of Incorporation of Vanderbilt Commons Owners'Association, Inc. as it survives after the merger. FIFTH: The membership of the merging corporation shall be affected by the merger as follows: All of the members of Carolina Commons Owners'Association,Inc.shall become members of Vanderbilt Commons Owners' Association, Inc. upon the effective date of the merger. SIXTH: The following additional provisions shall apply to this Plan of Merger: All directors of Carolina Commons Owners' Association, Inc. and Vanderbilt Commons Owners' Association,Inc.have adopted and approved of the merger in accordance with Florida law. The effective date of the merger shall be the date of filing of the Articles of Merger to which this Plan of Merger is attached. CARLOLINA COMMONS' OWNERS' VANDERBILT COMMONS' OWNERS' ASSOCIATION,INC., a Florida ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation not-for-profit corporation B Q E. B1 ! A . _ Ralp h R. Ciobire1t Ralp R. Cioffi, est!" t S:1C'ients\Vanderbilt Commons\Plan of Merger 18 DIE DAVIDSON rr1c iti rr��ue EXHIBIT "M" LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Frederick E.Hood,of Davidson Engineering,Inc.,and Bruce Anderson,of Cheffy Passidomo,P.A. I hereby authorize (Name of Agent) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in this Application. Signed -_ Date: a.t.a.oxp (Name of Owner(s o Record) I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application,and that the application is true,correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. . p i.e Signature of Applicant Ralph Cioffi,Manager,Vanderbilt Commons,LLC Name-Typed or Printed STATE OF ( CA0VCJ14-- ) COUNTY OF ( GAVeS ) p Sworn to and subscribed before me this O day of Vthk.ACA.k 'lirpOlb MY COMMIS • ' ' - ' Notary Public , xrar.'% JE$$t611HARREtSON it Notary Public->idte of Florida CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: I- 'r My Comm.Woes May 18,20t8 Commission FF 019254 ''f°` Bonded Through National Notary Mae. aanN"�- a who is personally known to me, — __ — — — — — — who has produced as identification and / did take an Oath did not take and Oath NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 - False Official Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of%500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term." 7 BE DAPI P„CV Eeu C.INEEA�NC EXHIBIT "N" ALTERNATIVE SITE ANALYSIS Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE DAVIDSON fNG�if T�ilfi� VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD/ COLLIER BLVD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT 15.88-ACRE EXPANSION AREA ALTERNATIVE SITE ANALYSIS Prepared For: Vanderbilt Commons, LLC c/o Welsh Companies of Florida, Inc. 2950 Tamiami Trail North,Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 and Prepared By: Davidson Engineering, Inc. 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 Naples, FL 34104 October, 2015 Revised February, 2016 Revised November,2016 Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com Contents Purpose and Focus: 1 Physical Description of Subject Property: 1 Market Study and Trade Area Analysis. 2 Alternative Site Analysis: 8 Attachments: Attachment A—Vicinity Map Attachment B—County ROW Deeds and Approved Vanderbilt Commons Plat Attachment C—Vanderbilt Commons Florida Land Use Classifications System Attachment D—Vanderbilt Commons Potential Listed Species Attachment E—Census Information for Collier County Attachment F—3.5 Mile Radial Planning Communities Attachment G—0.5 Mile Radial Planning Communities Attachment H—Parcel 00190040802&00188200007 Information Attachment I—Parcel 00188040005,00187400002, &00187240000 Information Attachment J—Ordinance 05-19 Carolina Village PUD Attachment K—Ordinance 11-08 Addie's Corner MPUD Attachment L—Ordinance 07-54 Tree Farm MPUD Attachment M —HEX NO. 2015-42 Tree Farm PDI Purpose and Focus: The intention of this marketing study is to provide an analysis for a modification to the existing Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict; demonstrating a change to the existing Growth Management Plan (GMP) as warranted. The existing Subdistrict is located west of the northwest corner of the signalized intersection between Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard and extends west on Vanderbilt Beach Road approximately 1,320 feet with about 525 feet of depth (see Attachment A - Vicinity Map). The Subdistrict consists of±49.33 acres of land —±33.45 acres from the originally approved Subdistrict with a ±15.88-acre expansion (Ordinance No. 2007-18 on January 25, 2007). The intent of the Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict is to provide convenient shopping, personal services and employment for the neighboring and Golden Gate Estates residential areas. The Collier County GMP currently designates the aforementioned expansion area (±15.88 acres) as a mixed-use commercial land use of the Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict with development stipulations. The text excludes the following uses from being permitted within the expansion area: gas stations, convenience store with gas pumps, fast food restaurants with drive through lanes and tire stores. These prohibited uses are permitted in the rest of this Subdistrict which is mostly built out. The proposal of this amendment application is to provide clarification on allowable commercial square footage, while including self-storage as determined by the Hearing Examiner as a comparable and compatible land use, via a Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) for the expansion area. Upon final approval and adoption of the GMPA, the property will have its PUD zoning amended to include the proposed commercial land uses and square footage by a Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) of Ordinance 2005-19. An existing Plat (Plat Book 60, Pages 31 and 32) has been approved through Collier County Development Services (PL20150000968)for±14.49 acres, an additional ±0.51 acres has been recorded via Tract A-1 within the Vanderbilt Commons Plat that has been deeded to the County through OR4577 PG3404, and the remaining ±0.88 acreage was deeded to the County under OR3573 PG0781; please refer to Attachment B. Physical Description of Subject Property: Recently, ecologist Jeremy Sterk of Earth Tech Environmental, LLC, prepared a Florida Land Use Cover Classifications System (FLUCCS) map and reviewed the potential protected species correlated with the FLUCCS map for the subject property. The FLUCCS shows ±14.49 acres, known as Vanderbilt Commons, as cleared existing water management pond and pine flatwoods preserve; please refer to Attachment D. The additional ±1.39 acres have been deeded as County owned right-of-way (Pristine Drive to the west and Buckstone Drive to the east). The potential protected species report advises that there are likely no protected species on-site; please refer to Attachment D. Market Study and Trade Area Analysis: To show a need for the Future Land Use designation modification, a market study has been performed identifying data and analysis to demonstrate that change is warranted, and that more inventory of the requested uses is needed. Dependents for this analysis include demands of the local/transient populations and existing site availability all within a 3.5-mile radial distance from the identified expansion area. The 3.5-mile radial distance was selected based on service convenience for potential users/residents in the near Estates designated lands to the east, the residential developments fronting south on Immokalee to the north,east of 1-75 to the west and north of Green Boulevard to the south. The subject property will be evaluated to ensure that the existing and future demographics will support the proposed land uses based on the following: • Existing local population • Proposed population growth • Existing services (specifically Restaurants/Coffee Shops/Cafe, Childcare/Pre-School, Medical and General Office, Self-Storage, and Retail) • Property Availability Existing Local Population Demographic information is an excellent indicator of demand for proposed services that are currently in short supply. Population statistics for the market study were determined based upon a 3.5-mile radial distance from the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard (please refer to Attachment E). In order to identify an accurate depiction of the population within the area of study the AUIR 2016 based upon BEBR medium growth rate projections information obtained from Collier County has been referenced. The AUIR 2016 identifies the area of study within four planning communities; refer to Attachment F. Within these planning communities the percentage of land representative of the 3.5-mile radius boundary was calculated to obtain a more precise population within the area of study, please refer to Table 1—Planning Community Area Calculations. Table 1—Planning Community Area Calculations for 3.5-Mile Distance Golden Gate Total Area w/in Planning Community 9,539 Acres Planning Study Area w/in Planning Community 1,146 Acres Community Percentage of Planning Community 12.01% Urban Estates Total Area w/in Planning Community 22,257 Acres Planning Study Area w/in Planning Community 14,941 Acres Community Percentage of Planning Community 67.13% Rural Estates Total Area w/in Planning Community 75,188 Acres Planning Study Area w/in Planning Community 6,822 Acres Community Percentage of Planning Community 9.07% Corkscrew Total Area w/in Planning Community 181,924 Acres Planning Study Area w/in Planning Community 1720 Acres Community Percentage of Planning Community 0.95% Utilizing the percentage calculated within Table 1, the following projections for permanent populations has been interpreted for the four aforementioned planning communities within Table 2. Please refer to Attachment E for specific AUIR 2016 referenced data. Table 2—Calculated Permanent Population 2016 within Market Study(3.5 Mile Distance) Permanent Population in 2016 45,540 Golden Gate Planning Community Percentage of Study Area w/in Planning Community 12.01% Approximate Population w/in 3.5 mile 5,469 Permanent Population in 2016 43,878 Urban Estates Planning Community Percentage of Study Area w/in Planning Community 67.13% Approximate Population w/in 3.5 mile 29,455 Permanent Population in 2016 36,052 Rural Estates Planning Community Percentage of Study Area w/in Planning Community 9.07% Approximate Population w/in 3.5 mile 3,270 Permanent Population in 2016 11,541 Corkscrew Planning Community Percentage of Study Area w/in Planning Community 0.95% Approximate Population w/in 3.5 mile 110 Total Permanent Population w/in Market Study: 38,304 To interpret the Peak population, additional information from the AUIR 2016 was evaluated resulting in a calculated 16.67% increase in population during peak season. This information ultimately, results in a base permanent population of 38,304 persons and peak seasonal population of 44,689 persons. To further define the population directly impacted by the proposed services, the same analysis was performed within a 0.5-mile radius from the development site. The AUIR 2016 identifies the aforementioned area of study within two planning communities; refer to Attachment G. Using the same technique previously completed for the 3.5-mile distance,the following results were obtained. Table 3—Planning Community Area Calculations for 0.5 Mile Distance Urban Estates Total Area w/in Planning Community 22,257 Acres Planning Area in Study 6,060 Acres Community Study Area w/in Community 27.23% Rural Estates Total Area w/in Planning Community 75,188 Acres Planning Area in Study 67 Acres Community Study Area w/in Community 0.09% Table 4-Calculated Permanent Population 2016 within Market Study(0.5 Mile Distance) Urban Estates Population in 2016 43,878 Planning Percentage of Study Area w/in Planning Community 27.23% Community Approximate Population w/in 3.5 mile 11,948 Rural Estates Population in 2016 36,052 Planning Percentage of Study Area w/in Planning Community 0.09% Community Approximate Population w/in 3.5 mile 32 Total Population: 11,980 This information ultimately, results in a base permanent population of 11,980 persons and peak seasonal population of 13,977 persons. Proposed Population Growth To further define a population in need of services, an analysis of the growth patterns within Collier County has been completed based on the AUIR 2016. Table 5-Projected Populations within 3.5- Mile Distance Year 2011 2016 2021 2026 Golden Gate Planning Permanent 5,405 5,471 5,490 5,509 Community Peak 6,306 6,383 6,405 6,42.7_ Urban Estates Permanent 26,067 29,455 34,822 39,554 Planning Community Peak 30,412 34,365 40,627 46,148 Rural Estates Permanent 3,156 3,271 3,534 3,767 Planning Community Peak 3,682 3,816 4,123 4,395 Corkscrew Planning Permanent 43 109 156 207 Community Peak 51 127 167 217 34,671 38,306 44,002 49,037 Permanent Total: 40,451 44,692 51,322 57,187 Peak Per the BEBR medium growth rate projections, the planning communities directly impacted by the development are growing at a rate of±9.0%every 5 years. As a result, placing the County within the top ten growth rates in the state of Florida; please refer to Attachment E. To verify growth within the defined limits, a review of permitted zoning rights and available properties has also been reviewed, specifically, the ±15.88 acre expansion area. This area is bordered by a large residential Planned Unit Development, Wolf Creek, to the west and north. Within Wolf Creek, 671 residential units have been permitted within the ±167.96-acre zoned property. To the south is Estates zoning with some undeveloped properties and properties developed with single family homes. To the west is a Commercial Planned Unit Development; Mission Hills. Mission Hills is currently 89% built out with approximately±3.73 acres of available commercial development with zoning restrictions. Also, to further promote growth within the area, transportation infrastructure within the vicinity has improved and has provided additional capacity on the adjacent roadways. Improvements include the widening of Collier Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard that have provided efficient alternative routes; both of which are arterial roads. Existing Services In defining a warranted use for the requested commercial services, locations of existing facilities were also identified. The services identified include the following uses: • Restaurants/Coffee Shops/Cafe • Childcare/Pre-School • Medical and General Office • Self-Storage • Retail The results are listed below, along with the respective addresses and distance from ±15.88-acre parcel measurements: Restaurants/Coffee Shops/Cafe 1. Café Blu 7550 Mission Hills Dr, Naples, FL 34120 (0.05 mi) 2. Panda Restaurant 7550 Mission Hills Dr#308, Naples, FL 34119 (0.05 mi) 3. Altaville Pizza & Deli 7550 Mission Hills Dr#318, Naples, FL 34119 (0.05 mi) 4. Subway 7550 Mission Hills Dr#322, Naples, FL 34119 (0.05 mi) 5. Blue Monkey Bar&Grill 7550 Mission Hills Dr, #326, Naples, FL 34119 (0.05 mi) 6. Dunkin Donuts 14259 Collier Blvd, Naples, FL 34119 (0.18 mi) 7. Ginos Trattoria Per Tutti 15215 Collier Blvd, Naples, FL 34119 (1.69 mi) 8. Pizza Hut 15215 Collier Blvd#305, Naples, FL 34119 (1.69 mi) 9. Coffee Cup 15215 Collier Blvd#310, Naples, FL 34119 (1.69 mi) 10. Hibachi of Japan 15215 Collier Blvd#307, Naples, FL 34119 (1.69 mi) Several restaurants, coffee shops and/or cafes are located within close proximity of the Vanderbilt Commons development. The nearest restaurants are located about 0.05 miles from the development and are within the Mission Hills Shopping Center. Access is available to the restaurants from Buckstone Drive,Vanderbilt Beach Road, Mission Hills Drive and Collier Boulevard. Childcare/Pre-School 1. St. Agnes Catholic Church: 7775 Vanderbilt Beach Rd, Naples, FL 34120 (0.29 mi) 2. Nicaea Academy: 14785 Collier Blvd, Naples, FL 34119 (0.92 mi) 3. Vineyards Elementary School: 6225 Arbor Blvd W, Naples, FL 34119 (2.24 mi) The nearest childcare/pre-school is located about 0.29 miles to the east of the Vanderbilt Commons development and is located in a religious institution. The religious institution is located at the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Vanderbilt Beach Road. Primary access to the site is available from Vanderbilt Beach Road, however, the site can also be accessed from Collier Boulevard via local roads, Bucks Run Drive and Running Buck Court. Medical and General Office 1. New Age Dentistry of Naples: 7550 Mission Hills Dr#122, Naples, FL 34119 (0.05 mi) 2. Living Word Executive Office: 7550 Mission Hills Dr#314, Naples, FL 34119 (0.05 mi) 3. State Farm Insurance Office: 7550 Mission Hills Dr#304, Naples, FL 34119 (0.05 mi) 4. Chiropractic Office: 7550 Mission Hills Dr#316, Naples, FL 34119 (0.05 mi) 5. Mission Hills Dentistry: 7485 Vanderbilt Beach Rd, Naples, FL 34119 (0.09 mi) 6. ChiroCare Express: 15205 Collier Blvd#105, Naples, FL 34119 (1.60 mi) 7. MacDonald Insurance: 15205 Collier Blvd#106, Naples, FL 3411 (1.60 mi) 8. Naples Golf Homes: 15205 Collier Blvd#201, Naples, FL 34119 (1.60 mi) 9. Management Office: 15205 Collier Blvd#207, Naples, FL 34119 (1.60 mi) 10. CPA-Tax Office: 15205 Collier Blvd#208, Naples, FL 34119 (1.60 mi) 11. Pregnancy Clinic: 15205 Collier Blvd#209, Naples, FL 34119 (1.60 mi) 12. NCH Medical Group: 15215 Collier Blvd#101, Naples, FL 3411 (1.69 mi) 13. Dentist Office: 15265 Collier Blvd Naples, FL 34119 (1.73 mi) Located to the west of Vanderbilt Commons, across Buckstone Drive, several medical and general office establishments are within the Mission Hills development. The nearest office is located about 0.05 miles from the Vanderbilt Commons Development. Access is available to the establishment through the internal driveways in the Mission Hills shopping center from Buckstone Drive, Vanderbilt Beach Road, Mission Hills Drive and Collier Boulevard. Retail 1. Winn Dixie: 7550 Mission Hills Dr, Naples, FL 34119 (0.05 mi) 2. Verizon Wireless: 15215 Collier Blvd#318, Naples, FL 34119 (1.61 mi) 3. Dagny's Spirits: 15205 Collier Blvd#103, Naples, FL 34119 (1.61 mi) 4. Publix: 15265 Collier Blvd, Naples, FL 34119 (1.78 mi) 5. Walgreens: 15295 Collier Blvd, Naples, FL 34119 (1.84 mi) 6. CVS Pharmacy: 8831 Immokalee Rd, Naples, FL 34120 (1.98 mi) 7. Mattress Firm: 8867 Immokalee Rd#102, Naples, FL 34120 (2.00 mi) The nearest retail development is located about 0.05 miles from Vanderbilt Commons and is located in the Mission Hills Shopping Center.The retail development can be accessed from Vanderbilt Beach Road, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Collier Boulevard through internal driveways in the Mission Hills Shopping Center. Self-Storage 1. Cypress Self Storage: 17755 Preserve Ln, Naples, FL 34119 (2.21 mi) 2. Naples Storage Units: 500 Executive Drive, Naples, 34119 (3.18 mi) As the results show, the closest self-storage is located 2.21 miles located on Immokalee Road within the Preserve Commons commercial area, directly adjacent from Gulf Coast High School/Laurel Oak Elementary. The facility has frontage on Preserve Lane (local road). Access is available to westbound and eastbound traffic via lmmokalee Road. Property A vailability Due to the specific nature of the land uses proposed minimum criteria controls and limits have been established for potential available sites for consideration. The key criteria for site development are as follows: • Eligible for C-4 Zoning • Minimum 10 acres in size • Located with frontage on an arterial or collector roadway In making the decision to proceed with the subject area (±15.88 acre area), all viable sites that are commercially available were reviewed and discussed. Due to the limited amount of undeveloped C-4 properties (including PUD Commercial with C-4+ intensities), few options existed. Available properties meeting the aforementioned criteria include the following: Option#1 Folio#'s: 00190040802 &00188200007 Legal: OR 1913 PG 1215 OR 5087 PG 93 Parcel Size: 17.26 Acres Zoning: Addie's Corner MPUD (Ordinance No. 11-08) The site is generally located on Immokalee Road approximately 3.13 miles east of 1-75, refer to Attachment H. Option#2 Folio#'s: 00188040005,00187400002, &00187240000 Address/Legal: 8799 lmmokalee Road/OR 4413 PGS 3836-3838 OR 4413 PG 3838 OR 4413 PG 3838 Parcel Size: 51.04 Acres Zoning: Treefarm MPUD(Ordinance No. 07-54) The site is generally located on the west site of Collier Boulevard Extension,just south of Immokalee Road; refer to Attachment 1. Alternative Site Analysis: To further identify a need for the designation modification to the Growth Management Plan a site analysis was completed of the existing property. The following information serves as the required data and analysis to support the GMPA for the property located on Vanderbilt Beach Road between Pristine Drive and Buckstone Drive. Within the analysis, the subject properties (15.88 acres) were evaluated in comparison with aforementioned available properties: • Eligible for C-4 Zoning and Land Uses • Minimum 10 acres in size • Located with frontage on an arterial or collector roadway These aforementioned specific criteria were chosen to provide an alternative site that will function for all proposed uses inclusive of the limited uses and the self-storage land use, as found consistent by the Hearing Examiner. For the particular uses being requested, self-storage is the limiting factor requiring a C-4 zoning with Conditional Use approval requirement. The acreage was selected in order to provide enough existing property to develop a mixture of permitted land uses; includes a minimum of 3 of the 5 proposed uses within a single development. Finally, due to the types of development being requested, frontage and accessibility is critical to endorse successful businesses. Within the following analysis the location of the subject property will meet or exceed the established aforementioned criteria that have been set forth. In making the decision to proceed with future development of the subject property, all viable sites that are commercially available were reviewed. It is assumed that all vacant/undeveloped and/or cleared properties adhere to criteria of availability. Due to the limited amount of undeveloped C-4 properties (including PUD Commercial with C-4 intensities),few options exist. Proposed Site Location Folio#'s: 79271800141,79271800044, 79271800167, 79271800183, 79271800028, 79271800086, 79271800109,79271800125, 79271800060 Address/Legal: 7373 Vanderbilt Beach Road (per the Collier County Property Appraiser's Website) BEING ALL OF VANDERBILT COMMONS LOTS 1—6 AND TRACTS A, B and C, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60, PAGES 31 AND 32 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Parcel Size: 14.49 Acres Zoning: Carolina Village PUD (Ordinance No.05-19);Attachment J The proposed site is owned by the applicant. It is currently zoned PUD with commercial intensity ranging from C-3 to C-4 land use categories with stipulations. Currently, the site is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Upon the successful completion of this GMPA Application, the increased developable square footage for commercial land uses will be found consistent and permitted within the Subdistrict and subsequent zoning. As noted above, to develop the property commercially, to include the increased developable square footage and justify additional square footage for self-storage, the applicant is required to file a GMP Amendment and a companion PUD Amendment for the property. The GMP Amendment's intent is to codify that the proposed land uses and 200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area for commercial land uses are appropriate for the location based on a thorough market analysis. A rezone will be necessary to develop the site for the increase in developable square footage, with additional language specific to self-storage. This site meets all of the stated criteria and is further justified by the market study. Alternate Site Locations: Alternate Site#1: Property located on Immokalee Road approximately 3.13 miles east of 1-75 Zoning: Addie's Corner MPUD;Attachment K Folio#'s: 00190040802 &00188200007 Parcel Size: 17.26 Acres Zoned under Ordinance 11-08, these parcels are void of any development. The site has a mixed-use zoning designation and is set to accommodate 135,000 square feet of commercial development and/or a retirement community/group at a FAR of 0.60 and/or a hotel/motel at an intensity of 26 units per acre. Identified in the Future Land Use Map as a portion of the Urban Residential Subdistrict and Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict,the GMP does not limit intensity. While it is certainly arguable that this location has the potential of providing more visibility it lacks viable accessibility. Its existing access locations and the future development of the C.R. 951 Extension roadway contribute to it being less attractive than the proposed site location. Furthermore, the proposed site location currently has a majority of the site infrastructure in the ground. The cost of providing "pad ready" sites with permitting and review, negatively impacts the suitability of the property. Additionally, due to the Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development zoning on the site, the intensity of the property is limited; thereby inhibiting space for all of the proposed uses. When compared to the proposed site location for compatibility and consistency with the intensity of the site from a zoning standpoint, the proposed site location is more logical and better suited site than this parcel. Alternate Site#2: Property located on west side of Collier Boulevard Extension, just north of Immokalee Road Zoning: Tree Farm MPUD;Attachment L Tree Farm PDI;Attachment M Folio#'s: 00188040005, 00187400002, &00187240000 Parcel Size: 51.04 Acres Ordinance 07-54 defines the zoning and development control of this property. These parcels are void of any development. The site has mixed-use zoning and is set to accommodate an 18.69-acre commercial area with a maximum 175,000 square feet of commercial/office uses 143,500 square feet of retail;while the balance is limited to office use. A minimum of 5,000 square feet shall be developed with professional or medical office use a minimum 15% of the density generated from the Activity Center acreage shall be developed within the Commercial-mixed-use District, the balance of the density generated from the Activity Center acreage may be developed within 1/3 mile of the Activity Center boundary. No more that 50% of the allowable commercial square footage may be developed prior to the development of at least Y2 of the minimum dwelling units within the Activity Center. No more than 75%of the maximum allowable commercial square footage may be developed prior to the development of the remaining 50% of the minimum required residential dwelling units within the Activity Center. A Planned Unit Development Insubstantial Change (PDI) was approved by the Collier County Hearing Examiner on October 22, 2015, reducing the allowed density and intensity. This was achieved by reducing the maximum number of residential units from 425 to 281 multi-family/townhouse or 138 single family-detached and reducing the density generated from the Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict from 7. 7 to 0 units/ acre; please refer to Attachment M. Identified in the Future Land Use Map as a portion of the Urban Residential Subdistrict and Mixed-Use Activity Center Subdistrict, the GMP does not limit intensity. It can be argued that this location has the potential of providing a more visibility due to its location, although it does lack immediate accessibility. As mentioned with the previous location,this site also has no internal and external infrastructure to connect with existing county utilities and roadway infrastructure. The cost of providing those features throughout, with permitting and review, the proposed site location remains a more suitable choice for location of the proposed land uses. Additionally, due to the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development zoning on the site, the intensity of the property is limited; thereby inhibiting space for all of the proposed uses. When compared to the proposed site location for compatibility and consistency with the intensity of the site from a zoning standpoint,the proposed site location is more logical and better suited site than this parcel. ATTACHMENT "A" Vicinity Map Z\Active Projects\V\Vanderbilt Commons\DWG\Planning\GIS1GM PA\2015-10-21 VC GM PA-EXHIBIT D(LOCATION MAP).mxd ) I N �'\J w+--'E E (7M—C.Z.1_2;_.(H 0 0.5 1 MILES E__,H \ _) L J VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD im_.— n A H ( i1 . , —I—) U o tY W J n O co w� J J GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARDI( W OJ 1) t \ k N .-N \ l ) ° c I, LEGEND -SUBJECT_PROPERTY I - MAJOR ROADWAYS SO'RCES:COLLIER COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS(2016) I (( 0 + d HEND-, PAL :EACH ,,,, vir- iiL t,- iii I ei,o, . li -p I t •�'^ M.� DADE -+' DEDAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC. VANDERBILT BEACH RD. / COLLIER BLVD. 4365 RADIO ROAD,SUITE 201 NAPLES, FL 34104 COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GMPA pAVI,DSONPHONE: 239-434-6060 ATTACHMENT A: VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENT "B" County ROW Deeds and Approved Vanderbilt Commons Plat 3408918 OR: 3573 PG: 0780 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER C00/7T, EL 05/26/2004 at 02:53PN DVIGBT I. BROCI, CLIRI RIC FEE 10.50 PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: DOC-.70 .70 THOMAS G.ECKERTY,ESQUIRE Retn: EXPRESS 12734 Kenwood Lane,Suite 89 RUDER NCCLOSIT ^ Fort Myers,FL 33907-5638 150 20D AVE I 11700 / Project Name: ST PETERSBURG FL 33701 Parcel No(s): Parent Tract Folio No: Recording:$ Documentary Stamps:$ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENTAL DEED THIS WARRANTY DEED made this /'y day of [ l 4 y ,2004,by MARK L. LINDNER,TRUSTEE UNDER LAND TRUST DATED 01/04199,with full power and authority to protect, conserve,sell,lease, encumber or to otherwise manage and dispose of the real property described herein,as provided in F.S.689.071(hereinafter referred to as AGrantora),whose post office address is 4980 Tamiami Trail,N,Suite 200,Naples,Florida 34103,to COLLIER COUNTY,A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA,its successors and assigns,whose post office address is 3301 Tam iami Trail,East, Naples,Florida 34112(hereinafter referred to as AGranteea). (Wherever used herein the terms AGrantora and AGrantees include all the parties to this instrument and their respective heirs,legal representatives,successors and assigns.) WITNESSETH: That the Grantor,for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars($10.00)and other valuable considerations,receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,hereby grants,bargains,sells,aliens, remises,releases,conveys and confirms unto the Grantee,all that certain land situate in Collier County,State of Florida,to wit: See attached Exhibit AA®whit. ' • • •orated herein by reference. RC• SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, - ''t-.,+•' • ' a -=-'•A ATIONS OF RECORD. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT H OMESTEAD OF O •R. TOGETHER with all th - •nts, _u•'•. ents =nd a p•,rte =nces thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining; TO HAVE AND TO HO t `�- +f e i r (`re ci AND the Grantor hereby•. -nts with said Grant.•A l:t the :Q. is lawfully seized of said land is fee simple;that the Grantor has , right and lawful auth• t' It . convey said land,and hereby warrants the title to said land and wi t1 :•d the same against'th- );:farms of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encum• = ••:- except as note. ••. ,J IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said t .rias(°. -• - sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed,sealed and delivered in the presence of: Printed name: 52,1 T MARK L. LINDNER,Trustee under land trust dated 01/04199,with full power and authority to ..,�. CC_CI- protect, conserve, sell, lease, encumber or to otherwise manage and dispose of the real property Printed name: sylk11 i.. Ce('- .rti described herein,as provided in F.S.689.071 STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) COUNTY OF COLLIER) ,/ , �y The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this/4 day of //f-- 2004,by Mark L.Lindner,Trustee under land trust dated 01/04/99 v/hois personally known OR who produced as identification,and who did/did not take an oath. -79 41-CAL THIS Y OF TrCE PTSD B THE Notary Public :i " COLLIER COUNTY,FLORID Commission No.: ,;: •, Cheryl F.Hill PURSUANT•O My Commission Exp bt nIIDD273268 DATED -!I-O4 rrEM No,/668)4- � � Expires:Dec 07,2007 '+ip Blukd Ttau Atlantic BaodiK Co.,Ian. ATTACHMENT"B" *** OR: 3573 PG: 0781 *** PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECT/ON .74, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS- COV41ENCE A T THE SOUTHEAST COWER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 6859'06` WEST, ALLWC THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECT/ON 34, A DISTANCE OF 1,322.15 FEET; THENCE' NORTH 0177'18" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 145.13 FEET TO A POINT CW THE NCR THERLY RICHT-OF-WAY UNE OF YANDERBIL T BEACH ROAD AND THE POINT OF 6ECINM/NC OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIED; THENCE NORTH 8859'06" WEST, ALONG SAID NOPTHERL Y RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE, A DISTANCE Cr 74.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0177'188' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 458.24 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1057'O9"EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0177'18- WEST, A DISTANCE OF 29.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89730'49- EAST, A DISTANCE OF 66.06 FEET TO A PONT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 Cr SAID SECTION 34; THENCE SOUTH 0177'18" EAST, ALONG LAST SAID LINE. A DISTANCE OF 524.03 FEET TO THE P(WT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 38,398 SQUARE FEET • 4Y Sy. MORE OR LESS. S(/B„ECT TO EASEMENTS, RES '!•.i'r r OP' •s. • DONS OF RECORD. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON TO THE SOUTH LI E SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 ON = NOR 879'06- NEST (ASSUMED). -r4 //:**;)) 9 STP:409845:1 INSTR 4443475 OR 4577 PG 3404 RECORDED 6/18/2010 11:59 AM PAGES 4 DWIGHT E. BROCK, COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DOC@.70 $0.70 REC $35.50 CONS $0.00 • This instrument was prepped tvithtwt opinion of title by. Gregory L.Urbaneie,Paq. . , Ooodlette,Coleman&Johnson,P.A. 4001 Ta niami Tial North,Suite 300 Naples,Florida 34103 Folio No.:Folio Nos.:00204760502,00204760706 and 00204761200 WARRANTY DEED (Parcel 10) THUS WARRANTY DEED is made on this •. of 3 ANI) ,2007,by CAROLINA OFFICES, INC., a Florida co • •r• •1!_i ss is 3775 Airport Road, Suite B, Naples, Florida 34105 and CAROLINA COMM* , ) .► mobility company,whose address is 2400 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 101, Napl,• • • •: 4103 (herein,° *TOW to collectively as "Grantor"), to COLLIER COUNTY, a political s ••t • •n of the State of Flori Wstiitrcessors and assigns, whose post office address is 3301 Tamiami Trai''East, •• ride 34112(hereinafter re},f4md to as"Grantee). / —�-- ' (Wherever used herein,the " tor"and "incl • all the '14,to this instrument and their respecti e • -�. ct1�2s,3u.—, , assigns.) Grantor,for and in cons i• ,n •f qi•'f N'-1 i t r' • ($10.00)and other good and valuable consideration,the sr rci of c here ac•;O1-•ged,hereby grants,bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, cos -� and confirms unto the c,•t-• al I,W,t certain land situate in Collier County,Florida,to wit: ' ip 14- (See Exhibit"A •0A .0,. and ,,:... .6.' .f) ftE CII - . SUBJECT TO:real estate taxes for the year 2007 and subsequent years;zoning,building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority;outstanding oil,gas and mineral rights of record,if any;and restrictions,reservations and easements of record. TOGETHER with all tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in otherwise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD,the same in fee simple forever. AND,Grantor hereby covenants with Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey this land;that Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to the land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. THIS CONVEYANCE ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY compagsioNERs. COWER COUNTY, PURSUANT TO THE ,• OF RESOwr,ON No, % 0 0-.3 7 (Page I of 4) OR 4577 PG 3405 h .. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned Grantor has duly executed and delivered this instrument the day and year first above written. Signed,Sealed and delivered CAROLINA OFFICES,INC., in the presence of: a Florida corporation 01- e4. Ncx6\1c.dt.... By: i1.-r2 '..' W."---eir-Id1/4"14LN..._ Print Name:0 �ar-`c nc__ raa�/t r� William L.Hoover,President Prin Name: 2 `� "Z'L / ‘. V- ("61›.„„ STATE OF FLORIDA / ( I c- \ COUNTY OF COLLIER 7 ;.1�. -1-"\\ 11, Fi THE FOREGOING INSTIL 1 + a n wf e i:} fo 4 1 e ofthi S day of J 4.-` , 2007, by Willi: -r.,.i , ,--0 -.:`N t o- •a'(1) A OFFICES, INC., a Flanda corporation,on behalf of said corpiic n who( is person. h},kno t r( •)has produced as acs kei cation. "`' Co ,,- :71 1 , • AN.yam No . `t' c Print Fame: D E/L 1 5 '�� State of Florida at Large My Commission Expires: (NotarytSeal) JEREMY STERIC t ,+""; Comm.D0021)13174 L '_`ori e= Expires moos i ,,,0 Bonded two(eoo)432.4254i Florida Notary Matt.Inc I (Page 2 of 4) OR 4577 PG 3406 ••l CAROLINA COMMONS,LLC, a Florida limited iability company 1/.• 1 i'... ! ..1 1 By: Lv A,�- .u...:.. Print , •�l rj� I �� George ukobratovich,Mana:er ► .5i,Y Q),-- Print Name: ,,, L. ()rb a..o i L STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER �_ THE FOREGOING INSTRU acknowledged e on this da o her g y Lord__te 1 2007,by George Vuko ovich,Manager,of CAR IN COMMONS,LLC,a Florida limited liability company,on behalf of said/Comperally lownn4o me or(^)has produced as i en at' i 1\t \ \ j IAFaLVTOPI , 'M t. CHERYL HILLESHEIM t'°' i` �_—Milk_I,,el p .: :.- MY COMMISSION a DD 475577 ot. Pub T. EXPIRES:September 25,2009 ` 4';,t ',. BordscalnNottryPWlcUndeno+bn a '3 Print Name: - a . State of Florida at ,,,g4) \ , y Commissio i -. e . A,.40 d as U for 3 suffiClency AW>t:.nt Ceefty Attorney Ellen T. CMiMell (Page 3 of 4) *** OR 4577 PG 3407 *** • EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tract A-1, Carolina Commons, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 48,Pages 78 and 79,Public Records of Collier County,Florida. COW • C-CnO • . .. (J g� U E CI711V-C V W Y .(� S �n w sm a 3 ` r F "• t i m.1O(stgPz 1 r§ 1 41 IT r e�h 8 m� E 'p q -a �e ;lgo -- ' €wya O w � habhEFN 3 .;j2,'2:4` m 0.1 in a;Y p 0 IR I p a .� g` J two g Ha aa !Y ! Mkt Z �11 449 1 r l , m m tR i4 '& a �Bgih t mr 4 N ff ti Yt Y ! 1 t o 1 "< 16'' a herb 0 0 01 C4o Wx y i 1 Ham. EO MRS i a `K F.: e h wee ` W���w g ll € hg tpON eL3-SR �aoF il int .� O "44Y OONp0QZ 2i g ee� zw � F e i <"7 ,- .5 4 ��mo� , U N`}k`del �I �o�� a� 1 ev 4 °d ye '• Y� `mYiM c�sr<oNo 'tl " pp Y' c-' Q1- i Vi z wmoo k Phpp _ < t:iw�V Py ic ,tL•s t 2 o- rc i g 1g�y� k R s` !"4 QkJNI z gox?o�� hi 15l !m 1 h8 ikhi g 1 O Z ti c L3W k 2 � 1 U 2 J a lip e ski t.N :>�a t r a1 i $g�aa41 yt 6 g $.' it t " b !}8@ e1 i i "ii mT nePtIm 1 1 taal - i. t b 1 nL".� ;tot a 3 y� ed!II i ai q I V41W:` E k 4 . ° t '4 "x 1111: g8 3 a cg AW�t r 222 K rRii k ^� ■ € ava a o iN P ka tie 11',4agOlg , $ i § 11 A @ a a� € R &h a'3" 3 i ii 4§ a ,19R 304 q t : K4 ff 11' ie ee it. I� b r,. 4It4 L :hkt■ i'te 1 r e 1 Its- 1 14 w - , 3 tihE11/ W ifie o 101i r , a ,,3, $ t C G :5m` P ` S h . W i $ e t : a : @1 et aa pa 0 i " flt ll, V.12.7. R 0 ." 4 14 h � i5g ;3 t ' Nb P Pt € YIl ., d Ai . A6g ;3 . : k . a8 Y , NI le wlt Im :1Nah ,$ W ,i _ W 0 • 2' o• � W m71u--n 99 W\WW►!!W►Wl►\!WW►Wx Whl WW3'<Wl W.Wx Wt W3ili 1 ten=.--E.„„. a N aan'r ;qr^araba:s.^?iA cenM1Roie RnaA^o lOtk 11 " ` ff�5Cr�g"'2 'RS.-9R.APPR ".P..PP.ItR RPPPRRC >. ..itl 4, .,,zsa t ailatat tat8t8iltaat ataagaon8S8$8 L____}+ a '_,-.� . p „ MNxxzzzxxzxxxzzxzx zxzzzzxxzxxzazxz xzxxz e� _3.r .23. -- 4 Lig„ 8 4w H'll ' `yi3n $83R:q$3ao,va Va R=''aF'a'ROI Rtkk R';8$$8 �_r'-- .7 v- `"'O A4 W .,9•n.R8451�1R`.H'4P::X ...I t`kV;n;87'_^7cnnnF �•nnnn �' Ry/��/3rr7:11 N € 2Q�"q< Pt 9355 C 'CI 3,r[rf00• CJ . �! , ,T.' n" "- w�nbb^ 59b9959'r939359 t•' ° P" 'Ill n wI It. 5.ah I w =c: h r 1L x io l 7� 49 '� 52181' C9 •uivDr sc r/.vmr sc r/.cr stmt.>. 711 cur�ani:nvrrCs•V 0'MX SC r%vsmnav.r E.ui v 1;.1p fE 11 si r/+Dr z Sf.1%ate,: 31 4 0'MX E a1/4 o, aars'.Ixx x ,8 m aN.ate'as:.r,r,:m'c:➢c c:➢: m �' aD.D9ar.ss.-s a:aes cs-eat aN...7.41."''',37:777, aa'xt:x r+-ri 3• R ax.boar Y':d lam:�: Ll� R s OT17Y£ -- I.TRN y�yy i J ��jC 15251 A ''h.•;-1 3'a, h °4 �'"•w41.1p 2 bREE°W'<< t4 Fy IL �fIVD/f\3.f40.1QOM 1 �l)J N�1 'Y 1 f 4 O 1 * h 11.4 aa° PI 1 210 gni kQ° o°p'° j �'t 1 , a�� a 01 10 t a Rig /Y 0 R " W. N "$I jm U '�^/� 1, �., gftl ..a4ho- b a h « d .p� „ xI x,oe o: . O O 1, ,IR jg4W ` ig q r' q. I n 31 n zt E ,,,, n . rt`'4,,. C IN, Y a C Z-yyl-t-3.r QE.g,N---4-r a. Q2� q4a � °ag "°C NI E a•Co i.c ft'4E'ks Zn N A W ° 1—t—j, ,H- , I, ,,,., I q h 7 !i 8 a 9 e R W ^� , x41 R a I'^ I-, "'--I—I v1 .m Q.)c''' L f " g g@st,�1g. t` �M1 h>. 3w ''T-r1.-I„ "R ' is 's 9 2� (�$^ b , . 8 .,. zi._ -4'it§h.4 baa a Ar, r$ ItiI' m x _F___, ,,- i4b`W ii,;is -P,i1.11"a 1 I tt2" u I 8 ;•--k - ' I were! L5.,KnooI I <0 I R ,,14,.O JO I 4--c-T----T o` i s i IFd m 3,1I 39\ " bi. • , • Q In b i fg"( II 1 j z 1 3,r{[t0a N ;0 >WWo Ws Q=x ao rW m i.k z , 4� yy a J 1.1 r - � of TIyaf�4W M 10 JOO RO E " Ud 1 .r., _—+3.1•Si00N IT 1 I el Utl, rk.POS} b III�TGiii F f^ ,y a - h IM p�2 2 44 4 Ig° 6i� y \ I rVti S b dR °I:s to , WW i `3.r�cnm N f I a w "`7"I b 7 \rN3.39 ; I • • .1I Is 1:„., • t - L1--- T--1 Fi . Nx. `I la ft. O d ..,. I 5 3 88 3 Eu"�! �s s$Y_ u m < = 3131 I s PP EPPg`OF PPPPPP ,,a 4 hl ; " D I LI 1 m � •4im .ia WWuWeu d " I R 'o 9 til . w',s °e W a y c ° <<, m ° k , , bh R '' r.0 _ r .4 rra TT111I P85782"DIME 10 0.[ T X'45.191X 81488-84,-481488-84,-4411>/. :WIXWC ^LfA£�a£ Ea-.i - 1- I -1,TOr 1 6R.50.,14418- _. -- y—Z39rN ' -- SSB- —"---• ia<rNc sr%a` / aN.axx un,runs sfa-3w: 1 ._IL...__ i Ni SE.1%0`.401.431 4 \ L_ T , g $ h W; S. ..,. ^f 7i£ yWh w � Z e� ,;R b4 yy Yi W 5.E. .4:,�7/E 5.�.: ;:i W'(=s`W WHs boy 4 tl9@9 bW ,SE.^.7v,.J4 t1�W b..."4 ;!. 4. l „_8 •n`b .jY�t R �` Y N fg ¢ O c1 d n d ATTACHMENT "C" Vanderbilt Commons Florida Land Use Classification Systems Map .r. "-a ,- -�'`; � 4_7..17 " y z vp g14 b ' m O V " z a - h >J w< cj + O f C O ri-411.. . .W v o U m ..,�• . rte.«: o U .... zNO CO _r cd E w T „y o o kk. i ,... • 11.. . . , od,. `t • 0 . ii .• iirQl oLo, ..r,,_..vz . a 1 D . NcC M A P m M 03 N _U w Zo mo c,,oW I >QI-OKo FE . Mr m Q O_ • WQ Lt M yWbfesSpNy_ =2_o,rn Ui., , y .. LU c,1 • . 7 % X da 2WAd` (ot., Z , .. ,,, . , ..._,., , 7,, . ,' -1411i "au t W Z d ..... ,. ... .. . . . „ „,...... . ......... . , , .. . .,..., 1„ ...„,„,, ., .. ,* ,,,,,.,, . ....- ... „.... ,,,,. .-...„,,,,...? , ,, ,,,, .. fk 'a g` ,,,, ... ._ .... d y4 . , y - a . „... , . . ... i 'e • • #! P Iti. **;-.,-;=.:.....:....--am . _ ' O Z v. H L. z co 3nlHG 3NI1SIH z ce 0 . )s r w C7 z a a r a f, N Wiz, ,} ; r t° Z 5• Ez w o h �.. -'. _ O Q m a z .,.- - t +~ l 3 I s m ,,I. , 0 c) ! v. rit m .. is h ,� ,� I LL .. ..w. ATTACHMENT "D" Vanderbilt Commons Potential Listed Species Attachment "D"- Vanderbilt Commons Potential Listed Species VANDERBILT COMMONS Florida Land Use Cover&Forms Classification System(FLUCCS)habitats present on site: FLUCCS 193 FLUCCS 411-E2 FLUCCS 500 The following is a composite table that contains the names of the protected species which have the highest probability of occurring in each onsite FLUCCS community: FLUCCS Potential Listed Species Scientific Name Designated Status FWC or FWS FDA 193 NONE NONE - 411 Beautiful Pawpaw Deeringothamnus pulchellus E E Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia T - Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais couperi T T Fakahatchee Burmannia Burmannia flava E - Florida Black Bear Ursus americanus floridanus T - Florida Coontie Zamia floridana C - Florida Panther Felis concolor coryi E E Gopher Frog Rana capito SSC - Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus SSC - Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis T E Satinleaf Chrysophyllum oliviforme E - Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus T - Twisted Air Plant Tillandsia flexousa E - 500 American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis SSC T(S/A) Everglades Mink Mustela vison evergladensis T - Limpkin Aramus guarauna SSC - Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea SSC - Reddish Egret Egretta rufescens SSC - Roseate Spoonbill Ajaia ajaja SSC - Snowy Egret Egretta thula SSC - Tricolored Heron Egretta tricolor SSC - The list of animals and birds was obtained from the FWC publication "Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species&Species of Special Concern-Official Lists",Publication Date:January 2013. The list of protected plant species was obtained from the publication"Notes on Florida's Endangered and Threatened Plants",Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services,Division of Plant Industry, Bureau of Entomology,Nematology&Plant Pathology-Botany Section,Contribution 38,5th Edition-2010). /-"N ATTACHMENT "E" Census Information for Collier County 10 E. _0,00 P".".\ CO I V,00 a aN CO a CO et 0 a 0 8 00 `av 9,h .O? V,'oh T'oCo I 4 15 o0 a'co a"a a co . a N a 0 h 0 al `off `,o t0 c `oh -a O) �'o r r'o M „�¢: 0 00O vo tp N0 rvM y h to a M a a p a M a a Q — — . Q a U) W co a } h O) r m `o Or m 0 ,,,W N Q voN .VO Co 7 vor F,o a- U aN M a"a W a M ao a LT_ — V II z 0) 0 '" CM) CMO 0220 _CD 2mr) 2 NN f-,e,05m dost 2(0 E8 a a M a a a M a a c a a i N r r CO `or _r CO `_tO < voO o O) of- o r MO a�co u-- M a a N CD N a 0 oa NO mOM) rnO °22tO 0o COO - ,0 mo wo COa .` oo0'10 v2 o PMO 70 a Mit) a a M °- a o N — — _ U V .- ICI 2MO CO or mtO �,�CO _o,N U doh v o 0 EOM d o .. a"M 0. et �M a V V U in S 2 c co N _r ,LO n _22• 0 U '2'oN ci a 9 N ei o�M 2NoN ✓ CO a at CO a a M 0 CO OD w N 0 - tD = M m M N 22 0 ,0 °r V H11,5M h N ,o CI �o0 tCO a�V' 3 M a a a P., U) N Z O) a E- O �,h u,M 0 ,,,00 r m rc 0 22 6or oN 022N mo LL) a i rvM 0- et m {`N') a at E 6. Is. r 1F�E UO 0 SII 02 00 v W t ,,, h 0 -,n O) n h N go t0 1-.7;o tic W EOM f-,'8.1 O) . `� ,, C 0 M a a m N O M a a 7 a 0 U `C NtO 0 O)• el N e 0 = CO o ro v F- 1°.'o tV r'o 0 Eo mo M ,4 _ *E• d�M 0- et �*E a M a a 'a F _ _ °S F- _ _ QU 0 a_ W W a W n M y{ - Z t rn o O Z m Q M M• r r `m O E_Y Ej PT, a O E$ h V>`8 A E e O 'a {Ld ,yS 0- e '� ~ d _ W W o v .2 Z Z 0 O_ 0 eC 0 p "v° Ill 0 !.3 U 7 b zZ > > Z O °i� O O ° 0 O O m 0 O V V O V V o m U _ w w v a n n itaCI O W 6, jeer 9 217 - ^ - m 4 ! #CO r . #s fr,.- $ \ R \ § r `VI CD CDk . .. ,5 - @a¥ •a- iv) \ ® ■ a 0 ■ ■ as ! F n � _ ego co - �� § �`a. a F � et � : m0 Gc0 §0 _ 7 - f®§ a f - § ] \ = 1- 0 r 0O \'k$ \ - E § } [ ON § , CO k - f�( V. e N. )rte # � 5ri7 {~_ _ k ~ ■ u \ EEi et e- at : 4 _ } )�§ § / � §k } SSq o 92. z ! ‘1..CI lMte {Ki_§ § 01 *� v. ks \ § . 12 ff !,k k cfq§ § { \ ¢ - § R co0 VA V- ) / ! , . ■ ■ - e § {-Kk / R ƒ$ _ . q ° I Lu 2 . \ { o o . § § u, 0 r• )okk / 9aa ° \ \ \ 2 \ ; I , O ' i z K \ 01 § _ - 1 F- 2 k \7k § E. aa % q ` - ■ / # • 3 k f t % < OS 1i f % ! Rea o ) $ \ jla. / k txMu e \ \ \ \ ( 218 YMe YQm� yM �o YM Lo e $ E w g e o E • a Y Rm Y e' "-M *� s ry' g.8 Y ,"1`.5°' y H' 6 s o N e 5 ry KIE tg ;,rv,� 1 E S n I R CZ,,.., 1 Rm,s E.o R 4^ a - - 55 Mm i -FA': 8 ,'.:mm 8 !. .,,i.°3 - P 'im t. Rnh a 5' YM ZIT. - _e Qm. v m eF gn 1. R Ne t Rad I R Q - ry Rm e R ¢ Rmo e 9 a YRH' - R". Y m R f m n e : R $ ` �Ra Sm fr8 _ mQ5N R 1,q4 _ R' m E. R.om R g EE na B _ Mme B - R mmor $ Hr a R B Q2e p Q^w s M^ o z ' - ^ e N N F.N _ — — — 2 .2a 9I VS N R^ - E rv�' fr � ,,,E. E. —.'Q 4f 1 Me« i ^m ¢M - m NN Z a _ZI a M^ E m Y Q m Y R m e Y R .1. 55:57; .f.. :9"'''' 2 m g d g mFM d E. gm 4 ry 22 qo€ meamm m �� g^ E Fsr. - R em• RR � _ R 2 J ^ i .-�� $0 s Rr & Q,on & s R «�� 2 g 2 " -2 - v o Y Vim^ QJN 1K ^ Rai'i -E4_ n ry rro $Q _ m • e ". n IR ' _ Czz e Z — — — G . v�n 1 R m E t. N = m E Q m o Q e W _ z i ry i ,.R O �, 8 m a - m a A E e E m i. a e RmN t Rn I "a RLi.c - r a Qn o XX c 2 : R n m E ry o 3 " $ - - S. ff a . "!''2 Qom F RE E e Fi F▪ 8 0 «e C mg — m" 9 02 Z i R-a i Ravi W 't R g Q ' d 2" 2 7 o' € o M go— 0 toe a 0•70. oil o — — ry a J B Rite n 9 Rau^i J a R t o' = Rgs v _r v sa0 m r fr a• $ « $ g$S N frQs Me s $ry n rv$e 8 y N w Z tEl w w Q f w w N 3 2 I..., s N- 3 oc wont w o :c).,1No_". o2 A x o w c mll3" t if > ;II - a- d I O F< wn O vn On , g o i3n s e. e Lj h Z Ey o Om "� a Eq Ow gEN . i O O LI O_ 2 Z 22 _ = 5fd,8 219 m < m mr — °p F, . ki a a e R e ry r e g e "' N N M - r v — m e n m v oO ',..3 m e va _ v m F mn .E R 1 e ry N v m a"'•• r r r M m H < nv n M O 27, O m I R Z e N r . o v r N H M 4 v N e a v o 2 m e r m e n m a g 22 v m o Q ry y H N dm m O N N N - 4 N O O n o a M m m R m m w vii.. ;:, w e � m n i vi = a n 6. '- '- `6 a r r r - r v "' o m a a Z. v m vi m li a o � v n a m � = a e w m M N r a n e -F ry N N m a a a a • r vv'i m _ a n a a m M• r r e n a r r r M a N e v n v n 2- 22 g M a o m e m avo ii a m m N r a g v " r r M o r e V _ 2 4' r n v '4 a m a o _ e D m M r r a U) M N o rN N m,,',.7,, o E _ voi o m a7 M o m vri "' � vm _ a 7.-', � E m m -E w v i m N N M - N m .e o e m �c m o m. = m a m F- e a v m m a e a = a m m C - n g , r a m m � r r M m.. o M a m d O N mb r m N sl FE N N E < W O i. N m N O V M 2,2 r- N M - .4. n m a m E i l m n m M o nM v N = N m m n m m H N ii`...1. U 2 V H h V b _ d a y _ §nn8NOV2 � r , NM 1 -M a E Q m n n V arp V - v, M 72 N 4 V M N M n R M M v U c m R r _ O V N o c:7,. nN ma F. = n nn ' - Q E o - - N `,7; i r O N E o n � 0I mN Nm - � � M ' : v _ a y�5 R Z O wmi V " OMi N T O - V m N a ry R E_ o N 1' a N V V im+f 4 m .N E o m ; _ - R E m M m E U RR K O n Z N n • r m r LL Gm N - M s g 5 _ W m _ i ? •Om M ama m m = v ; am a • r a mN n n n - i t O E o N N N < M M ' nNNEO MM U _ 5 N U W " * E o m M r vi N n E o a - m N N — N e M r t - - m M tl t W Ui ' 5 ° U Z G 4' N N m O N m O M a _ _ = a a n e rE n *..6, H 1 ft m - ; - r ao E o M - - _ - s _ • a N m M U - C - V - T h O M M Cf O �- M Of m U Om b m n m M Q> O r O a $¢j Q a0 O� M M [ it I Z a , V N N b f0 - N N E 1 O O m N _ Y o Z - - e s E n f J ! - a v m K a a - G i. m ' ; acZcVAm Y g,. !z. z a ° v 4Zzzw w LT d g T a v y c o : 0 ' F E U wz o co O - U nm RR a R - c o d " —-2 9 o x` o a Z - ' - v a n C UwClagaU E rn o w 0 g g ° a i 1 2 O Z Z Z Z UWW LL U 20 RR2 s v(, V Z . UW U . KEKU _ m . 220 A N t0 M N O) N tD N N O 0 O t0 N N 0 O N 10 N )- 0 0zr, N N A 0 N Q 0 _ m O) O N m N � � O) O N N N_ - m Q O CO O h p Q N N th t7 N t0 tO 10 W Q N M 93 n CO Q Q CO Q N N N M a N Q Q a �, O N Q 0 O Q N O) Q N ig Q7 O N M O t0 Q O O N M A OD t0 N - Q N_ A Ol O f0 07 N r N — _ m Q 0) 0) Q N O Q O t0 N Q' t0 N N 0 - M N a lOO V N N Q tO Q N N 6 N V Q a "r°. o M n A M m A 0 A 'TiE to W 0) 0 O N O O) N M O M O _r T A N O A A N A O N _ r Q 0 N O y O 0 tJ N N N O N Q N Q N 0 A N M t0 Q Q 0 Q N N N M r Q NQ _ OO N N O 00 10A 0 0 O 0 O < N N O 0 4A N O N N N N _ 0 Q co M N 0 O M 0 0 - V V Ci f0 10 'N A a N )O Q N N V N Q N N N N Q N A O N O 0QN E W rE3h tD OA) Q A _ ur ii. NO N NN - tG M N N V N V Q N N N A ,k,.—c9 N Y N n Mn NNM 0yb _ o .- N M co 0 coN O (0_tV O 2 c V CO. A N MNNN t0 O V NNNN .6 O O toOtO Q N Q CO 'N O n Q li t0 OA 0 M Q M Q N M O 0 Q N NM O N _▪ n .c..? N N O A QNA0NAN T _ m Q N N N -N N M N N V N V M N N N OO - a- N 4 0 a M Q - oH n 0 to N NN ,ON aN Q A N " N O Q M Q C) a m m A oQ .- tO N a o Cr N m" O o o N V v n . o N Ti a 0n0)1 aN N MN N N • N N N M t _ N 2 vi 2 A m v N F.."4 n yy m n ono Q E V A M A N A N N N O O .. N M _ Q M tD Q W d Z 0 0 0 N A Q N N N M N o2 N 0 M A N 0 M N Q N N N V n M n '� O N t0 0 0) N O t0 Q A O N O C '" M f:'-' A A 0) N • 0 N O 0 V A A M to N I O N A 0 N 0 1- A 0) N O Q N 0 _ O N M O A 4 0 O t0 O) Q CO- N O n N N ' 0) ry 0 M N V N N N Q N M N a m� n y n M O N K o dNA CO M M h Q 0 a N t0 A Q 4 O A O O 0 A M Q t 0) Q N m y ' O 0 n 0 gf tri N N Q N N tri N N 0 r N N N n o _ Q Q 0 O N O O) A Q Q O) 0 tO 0 N E. '0'). N O N Q N M 4 h N T M A A - O 0 a m o A to m a to = Q o ro ao O 0 T n N N N N 'O t0 0 ° /� - -N N M N V Q M N N - N M N = M M U U n n N 0 N 0Q0 MN NN N) AO 0N A 0 M t0 L01, 0 ,- CO N W0000) 0) Qt0QQ0Q 0O rMAMQtD Q N ON2G o R. N M 0 N Q V M N ' N N - N M O a M a N - 5 .4 y W N A M.- 0 AA R N Q T 0 N A N AA O OM ° O . 0 A M .- N 0 nt0 ,- Otp 0 Q 0 0N O) 'EY-. O _ 0 N tM') �' N Q 3 t0') ^ 4 N 0 d 0 N CA'> N m N a M M O] H t0 MN N M N A M N 0 O CO CO l0 h Ea . 3 0 C] N 0. N O A 4 2 OGQ 2 E N A W W O , ONVNN O t0 Ct M N M r O N A O 1O n y n 0 0 0 Q n T 0 W 0 0 A) d 0 0 0 Q N- om tO M W D < d t0 O NI 00N QNNM - 'Fe-3 hc M Di P.; N - ai Q M g o :2-.°1u _ My O. N 41 Q- - Z y AN N) N) O Q O M N Q WM O O CO' M M M p - m N 0 O M Q Q N 9- N CO N CO - m Q N N N 0 O co- MOi N N O N e- O Q O g O t0 T toM ? Va N Q Q M N O) M g Wm W )' RO x QOoQON ht0Q Q N O M v N A O M N d O_ - N WNOMMAO- N Q CO AN N - NQNN N A EO n N 0 N V N M M IA N N E_ o t0 4M i O C .; N m Nf - 4 - N _ - '55', W N O A O N n n 04 A N Q pQ O pp CO Ca m 3, a e0- A H 4 a O N 2 N v2i N v = V- n a N • E O N N co- N N M N tp O O E O t0(P tD t0 �• r ,- N Q 1- N N v M N U N o N 0 _ W oN ig Z v N A N N tN Q O N O N M M m M O Q 0M M - o n p - t0 CO N TA A N O 0) M N M ei, 0 Q P 9 CO_ - dC Q r rEENNVN y M A - N Q N O E O t0 tE. Q v Na C tp 99 Q U t E R Oh nO O REOVVm m � ^ N Vo O nM N N tN) ° 12 E5OJQuj' WnO) M R' .- O ^_ Er, RoMbA ) i- Y W ry .0- NV 0A tV v N co E d Z Z2 N N 'tl 4 0 0- E 7! ` U -` Za d a h N N ya N i '0 El O E t z `: ZZ' 7 N iEvL o ° UOcczz _ cWwLae U i r _ L e. Lu • y Z t°n 0 w M K 10 r° o f M. q 2 _ 7 E E c U E n O - ' o O 2 2 2 2 O W W ' LL 0 A to U ± u V 2 m U W U' D K 2 K U - 03 .LE ; 2 2 c2 Fs n: ,t 0 221 G y N «N Y d ` •+ �_Y NONdlG-W W W y Y >.C W Y—100 ;3 ns F 0=U E -a Z m D ,,E N.0,010-� r( LT] _W 0 i z2 U' a� Zz N �— Z N N �y_ d Q am . .c. o e Z J Z Z C 03 Z a = R 0Z= 0 , D i' _O N ` O d O R O O m ZUo Worm -CV C)...0 tO 2 HEND"Y COUNTY O . . rry Uy 4 /n v -as zIV6e&,.) Ittir! Z /I o FZ v Q , ,. N , ., .A . ,;..!A ' '''''J F ! ! Ci 1/�1 _ 15 L9 . „lik-'---: i-:- o � J aa >- (,,,,,nii....„, , ,,,,,,...,..„, E Ce Zif w o O O i UCDz� _ ■L L96. 72 3 LLU �, '' , .. C) . :....,. co W = o✓ w1 L� O � 115.7::,.:. :,. : Z N J cf.III U FM "Igl.;: -1 v a co i a ., Q u. a ��r r l GULF OF MEX,co G F o C.) 6 1„<e?'''' ,mss A 222 ATTACHMENT "F" 3.5 Mile Radial Planning Communities Map Z:\Active Projects\V\Vanderbilt Commons\DWG\Planning\GIS\GMPA\2016-02-04 VC GMPA-EXHIBIT V(PLANNING COMM.).mxd N LEGEND I W _P)•-- E VANDERBILT BEACH RD./COLLIER BLVDCOMM. ,. r SUBDISTRICT(EXP.AREA.1,125E11\3/ 5.88AC) rte - j 3.5 MILE RADIUS S I E lE North Naples -Urban Estates -Central Naples ®Golden Gate Rural Estates =Corkscrew UlryiffM���� 9;Corkscrew orkscrew �• Ii ;i I • �` / --- / IMMOKALEE RD/GR 846 RD/OR 46 hp / 1 • ♦ / / — 1 North I�apl,a- - I; / tim 0 12 Urban Estates I 1 i I \\ ., 1 1 _ 1 1 I_ _Q y VANDERBILT BEACH RE ' 1 ortc — i I 1 I Fes- _ _ I 1 } B Rural Estates / - — — 1 GOLDEN GATE BIJJD 1 ( o -J CO ♦ .__._.... ' Z / I- \ O / w _ \` j WHITE BLVD PINE RIDGE RD /� _ s'�1 wl / I r �� o _ F m / 0 wLi.,II W z J I '! r� — N O ` I �' I 6T AVE�.,S � GREEN BLVD �II Z m ♦` I! �j- 1 :T 1 t I L___ t I —i < �...—_..�............••• s J Q ca Golden-Gate ,-1 I" 0 1 1 2 . . .., ,,_-a - :P7...,... (MILES COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC IFORMATION'SYSTEMS(2016) 4 I zfI) t 1I11Ii-- ' � I 1 DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC. VANDERBILT BEACH RD. / COLLIER BLVD. DE4365 RADIO ROAD, SUITE 201 COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GMPA NAPLES, FL 34104 DAVIDSON PHONE: 239-434-6060 ATTACHMENT F: 3.5 MILE RADIUS PLANNING COMMUNITIES ATTACHMENT "G" 0.5 Mile Radial Planning Communities Map Z:1Active Projects\V\Vanderbilt Commons\DWG\Planning\GISIGMPA\2016-02-04 VC GMPA-ATTACHMENT H(HALF-MILE PLANNING COMM.).mxd i N LEGEND liVANDERBILT BEACH RD./COLLIER BLVD. W�� E COMM.SUBDISTRICT(EXP.AREA 15.88AC) L j 1/2 MILE RADIUS SA-- -Urban Estates Rural Estates +,�aa - : ,:. 4.,mss; ,,. .. _ m 8 Rural Estates •• • •I 1 I 1 1 1 VANDERBILT BEACH RD EXT «gam .. ..._ .. 1 2 Urban Estates CHERRY WOOD DR ♦ 7TH AVE NW - 7TH AVE NW _ " • / `; HICKORY WOOD DR ``• 5TH AVE NW J/�' I 5TH AVE NW ---- -! i•• 0 02 CL W I 02 W I CORAL WOOD DR 3RD AVE NW 3RD AVE NW I I TEAK WOOD DR 1ST AVE NW 1ST AVE NW - OLDEN GATE BLVD 0 0.25 = - ( ' GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ( i J ' 1ST, 1N DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC. VANDERBILT BEACH RD. / COLLIER BLVD. DENAPLES COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GMPA , FL 34104 DAVIDSON PHONE: 239-434-6060 ATTACHMENT G: 1/2 MILE RADIUS PLANNING COMMUNITIES Ett Gtt4EEPiF3ta ATTACHMENT "H" Parcel 00190040802 & 00188200007 Information Attachment°H"- Parcel 00190040802 &00188200007 Information Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No. 00188200007 Site Adr. Pllier.County_Prope Appraiser{-.Year:2015 Land Parcel:A8821011 Open a GIS Window with More Features. http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00188200007 10/23/2015 Page 1 of l Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00190040802 Site Adr. Name/Address 1 CREEKSIDE WEST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY i City NAPLES State FL Zip L3_4105 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3622 000100 070 3622 22 48 26 10 Legal 22 48 26 N1/2 OF W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4,OR 1913 PG 1215 Millage Area O 222 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 100-ACREAGE HEADER School ' Other Total w Use Coded 99-ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.48 5.6427 11.1227 Latest Sales History 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book-Page Amount----- Land Value $ 527,380 08/06/15 5182-2213 $ 1,850,000 ----_ - -- (+) Improved Value $0 09/24/09 4494-2443 $0 (=) Market Value 03/07/05 3746-2214 $0 $ 527,380 02/10/94 1913 1215 $0 (-) 10%Cap $ 15,462 (=) Assessed Value $511,918 (=> School Taxable Value $527,380 (=) Taxable Value $ 511,918. If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetai l.htm 1?Map=No&FolioNum=00190040802 10/23/2015 Search Results Page 1 of 1 Collier County Tax Collector 3291 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL 34112 2014 Tax Roll Inquiry System Print this page Sign up for eBill for an electronic,paperless tax bill in 2015. OWNER INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION Name:(HAPPY#4 FAMILY CORPORATION Parcel:100190040802 Acre: 10.00 Address: 270 NAPLES COVE DR APT 3504 Loc: NAPLES (Map)(GIS View) Address: Legal: 22 48 26 N1/2 OF W1/2 OF SE1/4 Address: I Legal:1OF SE1/4,OR 1913 PG 1215 Address: Legal: Address: NAPLES,FL 34110-7674 Legal: VALUE/EXEMPTIONS TAX INFORMATION PAY TERMS PAYMENT INFO Market Value: 465,380 County: 1672.49 Nov: 5025.97 Paid Dt: 11/19/2014 Taxable Value: 465,380 School St: 1550.65 Dec: 5078.33 Recpt: 6438 Millage Code: 222 School loc: 1046.17 Jan: 5130.68 Mach: 6 Homested Ex: 0 City Tax: 0.00 Feb: 5183.04 Paymt: 5,025.97 Agricltr Ex: 0 Dependt: 333.26 Mar: 5235.39 Mort: 0 Widow Ex: 0 Water: 144.13 Apr: 1.0 STATUS INFO. Blind Ex: 0 Independ: 488.69 May: Non Ad Va: N Disabled: 0 Voter Appr: 0.00 Now Due: 0.00 Installment:IN Veteran Ex: 0 *Gross Tax: 5235.39 Deferred: N Wholly Ex: 0 Appr fee: .0 Bankrupt: N Civilian Ex: 0 Advertising: 0.00 TDA: 0 COMMENTS New Search Back To List 2003 Parcel Information 1 2004 Parcel Information 12005 Parcel Information 12006 Parcel Information 1 2007 Parcel Information I 2008 Parcel Information 1 2009 Parcel Information 1 2010 Parcel Information 1 2011 Parcel Information 12012 Parcel Information 12013 Parcel Information Last Updated: 10/22/2015 5:00pm http://www.colliertax.com/search/view.php?ID=683925454&page=l&tc=1&taxyear=20... 10/23/2015 Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser �_ Property Aerial �- Parcel No. 00190040802 Site Adr. I fi. . . - Y t l'' \ Y do , - _ .E#' y x 1 Oilier, Aunty,.,r. . ,rt Ap a raiser •Year, _01 _ + 1.,„4! :02 Open a GIS Window with More Features. http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00190040802 10/23/2015 Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00188200007 Site Adr. Name/Address CREEKSIDE WEST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY City NAPLES State FL Zip I 34105 Map No. Strap No. Section Township ! Range Acres *Estimated -1 3622 000100 026 03622 22 48 26 7.26 I22 48 26 51/2 OF W1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4, LESS R/W,OR 1514 PG 473,AND LESS R/W AS DESC IN Legal OR 5087 PG 93 Millage Area 0 222 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 100-ACREAGE HEADER School I Other Total Use Code 0 199 -ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.48 5.6427 11.1227 Latest Sales History 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book-Page Amount Land Value $617,10' 08/06/15 5182-2213 $ 1,850,000 (+) Improved Value $ 09/24/09 4494-2443_i $0 - - (=) Market Value $617,100 03/07/05 3746-2212 $0 ___.. (-) 10%Cap $8,925 03/28/90 1514-473 $0 __. 11/01/81 945-1493 $ 104,500 (=) Assessed Value $608,175 03/01/64 163-154 $0 (=) School Taxable Value $ 617,100 1 (=) Taxable Value $ 608,175 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00188200007 10/23/2015 Search Results Page 1 of 1 Collier County Tax Collector 3291 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL 34112 2014 Tax Roll Inquiry System Print this page Sign on for eBill for an electronic,paperless tax bill in 2015. OWNER INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION Name: HAPPY#4 FAMILY CORPORATION Parcel: 00188200007 Acre: 8.49 Address: 270 NAPLES COVE DR APT 3504 Loc: NAPLES (Map)(GIS View) Address: Legal:122 48 26 S1/2 OF W1/2 OF SE1/4 Address: Legal: OF SE1/4,LESS R/W,OR 1514 PG Address: Legal: 473 Address: NAPLES,FL 34110-7674 Legal: VALUE/EXEMPTIONS TAX INFORMATION PAY TERMS PAYMENT INFO Market Value: 636,750 County: 2288.36 Nov: 6876.73 Paid Dt: 11/19/2014 Taxable Value: 636,750 School St: 2121.65 _ Dec: 6948.36 Recpt: 6436 Millage Code: 222 School loc: 1431.41 Jan: 7019.99 Mach: 6 Homested Ex: 0 City Tax: 0.00 — Feb: 7091.63 Paymt: 6,876.73 Agricltr Ex: 0 Dependt: 455.98 Mar: 7163.26 Mort: 0 Widow Ex: 0 Water: 197.21 Apr: .0 STATUS INFO. Blind Ex: 0 Independ: 668.65 May: .0 Non Ad Va: N Disabled: 0 Voter Appr: 0.00 Now Due: 0.00 Installment: N Veteran Ex: 0 *Gross Tax: 7163.26 Deferred: N Wholly Ex: 0 Appr fee: .0 Bankrupt: N Civilian Ex: 0 Advertising: 0.00 TDA: 0 COMMENTS New Search Back To List 2003 Parcel Information 12004 Parcel Information 12005 Parcel Information 12006 Parcel Information I 2007 Parcel Information 12008 Parcel Information 12009 Parcel Information 12010 Parcel Information 1201 1 Parcel Information I 2012 Parcel Information I 2013 Parcel Information Last Updated: 10/22/2015 5:00pm http://www.colliertax.com/search/view.php?ID=683925377&page=1&tc=l&tax year=20... 10/23/2015 ATTACHMENT "I" Parcel 00188040005, 00187400002 & 00187240000 Information Attachment"I"- Parcel 00188040005,00187400002,&00187240000 Information Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No. 00188040005 Site Adr. ,8799 IMMOKALEE RD 01444. • a1Iie '; aunt °<° a = 4 ° _ice om' ' •ree1..1880400O5 Open a GIS Window with More Features. http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00188040005 10/23/2015 Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00188040005 Site Adr. 8799 IMMOKALEE RD / \ Name/Address MONAGHAN TR,THOMAS S 'TREE FARM LAND TRUST 24 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT DR r------- City !ANN ARBOR State MI Zip 48105-9484 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3B22 000100 023 3B22 22 48 26 14.12 Legal 22 48 26 E1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SE1/4, LESS CANAL R/W S 100FT, LESS THOSE PORTIONS AS DESC IN OR 4413 PGS 3836-3838 Millage Area 0 222 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 100-ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 99-ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.48 5.6427 11.1227 Latest Sales History 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book-Page Amount Land Value $ 1,412,00Y 11/16/10 4625-278 $0 (+) Improved Value $t, 09/16/04 3643-3261 $0 - (=) Market Value $ 1,412,000 09/16/04 3643-3259 $0 ~ 08/29/02 3099-3456 $ (-) 10%Cap $ 557,740 08/29/02 3099-3453 $ 5,700,000 (=) Assessed Value $854,260 07/15/98 2441-1147 $2,663,200 (=) School Taxable Value $ 1,412,000i 07/15/98 2441 1144 $0 [ (=) Taxable Value $854,2601 04/01/88 1344-47 $ 1,293,500 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 04/01/84 I 1078-1675 $0 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00188040005 10/23/20]5 Search Results Page 1 of 1 Collier County Tax Collector 3291 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL 34112 2014 Tax Roll Inquiry System Print this page Sian up for eBill for an electronic,paperless tax bill in 2015. OWNER INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION Name: MONAGHAN TR,THOMAS S Parcel: 00188040005 Acre: 14.12 Address: TREE FARM LAND TRUST Loc: 8799 IMMOKALEE RD NAPLES (Map)(GIS View) Address: 24 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT DR Legal: 22 48 26 E1/2 OF SE1/4 OF Address: Legal: SEI/4,LESS CANAL R/W S 100FT, Address: Legal: LESS THOSE PORTIONS AS DESC IN Address: ANN ARBOR,MI 48105-9484 Legal: OR 4413 PGS 3836-3838 VALUE/EXEMPTIONS TAX INFORMATION PAY TERMS PAYMENT INFO Market Value: 1,059,000 County: 2790.94 Nov: 9899.81 Paid Dt• 11/26/2014 Taxable Value: 776,600 School St: 3528.59 Dec: 10002.93 Recpt: 67863 Millage Code: 222 School loc: 2380.63 Jan: 10106.05 Mach: 9 Homested Ex: 0 City Tax: 0.00 Feb: 10209.18 Paymt: 9,899.81 Agricltr Ex: 0 Dependt: 556.12 Mar: 10312.30 Mort:10 Widow Ex: 0 Water: 240.51 Apr: .0 Blind Ex: 0 Independ: 815.51 May: .0 __, STATUS INFO. Disabled: 0 Voter Appr: 0.00 Now Due: 0.00 -, Non Ad Va: N Veteran Ex: 0 Installment: N Gross Tax: 10312.30 Deferred: N Wholly Ex: 0 Appr fee: .0 Bankrupt: N Civilian Ex: 0 Advertising: 0.00 TDA: 0 COMMENTS New Search Back To List 2003 Parcel Information 12004 Parcel Information 12005 Parcel Information 12006 Parcel Information 2007 Parcel Information 12008 Parcel Information 12009 Parcel Information 12010 Parcel Information I 2011 Parcel Information 12012 Parcel Information 12013 Parcel Information Last Updated: 10/22/2015 5:00pm http://www.colliertax.com/search/view.php?ID=683925373&page=l&tc=1&tax_year=20... 10/23/2015 Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No. 00187400002 Site Adr. 4 hi 1 . .4., 1 y*t �Vm•�celJ�7lDR E . 3 y II j J' i YI I �II \ i , ' it w . I }.,"`gtv A$. Collier .oun 1�Pro.e 4 . . . . i -W' _ . arcel 167400002 .)'� Open a GIS Window with More Features. http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00187400002 10/23/2015 Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00187400002 Site Adr. Name/Address 1...MONAGHAN TR,THOMAS S i TREE FARM LAND TRUST 24 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT DR City ANN ARBOR State ,MI Zip 48105-9484 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3622 000100 011 3622 22 48 26 18.46 Legal 22 48 26 E1/2 OF NE1/4 OF SE1/4, LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 4413 PG 3838 Millage Area 0 222 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 100-ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 99 -ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.48 5.6427 11.1227 Latest Sales History 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book-Pae Amount Land Value $1,846,000 11/16/10 4625-278 $0 , (+) Improved Value $0 09/16/04 3643-3261 $0 _r 09/16/04 3643-3259 $0 (=) Market Value $ 1,846,000 08/29/02 3099-3456 $0 (-) 10%Cap $729,170 08/29/02 3099-3453 $5,700,000 (=) Assessed Value $ 1,116,830 07/15/98 2441-1147 -� $2,663,200 (=) School Taxable Value $1,846,000 07/15/98 2441-1144 $0 -__ - - (=) Taxable Value $ 1,116,830 04/01/88 1344-47 $1,293,500 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 04/01/84 1078-1675 $0 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00187400002 10/23/2015 Search Results Page 1 of l Collier County Tax Collector 3291 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL 34112 2014 Tax Roll Inquiry System Print this page Sian un for eBill for an electronic,paperless tax bill in 2015. OWNER INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION Name: MONAGHAN TR,THOMAS S Parcel: 00187400002 Acre: 18.46 Address: TREE FARM LAND TRUST Loc:(NAPLES (Man)(GIS View) Address: 24 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT DR Legal:122 48 26 E1/2 OF NE1/4 OF Address: Legal:15E1/4,LESS THAT PORTION FOR Address: Legal: R/W AS DESC IN OR 4413 PG Address:IANN ARBOR,MI 48105-9484 Legal:13838 VALUE/EXEMPTIONS TAX INFORMATION PAY TERMS PAYMENT INFO Market Value: 1,384,500 County: 3648.79 Nov: 12942.69 Paid Dt: 11/26/2014 Taxable Value: 1,015,300 School St: 4613.15 Dec: 13077.51 Recpt: 67864 Millage Code: 222 School loc: 3112.36 Jan: 13212.33 Mach: 9 Homested Ex: 0 City Tax: 0.00 Feb: 13347.15 Paymt: 12,942.69 Agricltr Ex: 0 Dependt: 727.06 Mar: 13481.97 Mort: 0 Widow Ex: 0 Water: 314.44 Apr: .0 STATUS INFO. Blind Ex: 0 Independ: 1,066.17 May: .0 Non Ad Va: N Disabled: 0 Voter Appr: 0.00 Now Due: 0.00 " Installment: N Veteran Ex: 0 *Gross Tax: 13481.97 Deferred: N Wholly Ex: 0 Appr fee: .0 Bankrupt: N Civilian Ex: 0 Advertising: 0.00 TDA: 0 COMMENTS New Search Back To List 2003 Parcel Information 12004 Parcel Information 1 2005 Parcel Information 1 2006 Parcel Information 12007 Parcel Information 12008 Parcel Information 1 2009 Parcel Information I 2010 Parcel Information 12011 Parcel Information 12012 Parcel Information 12013 Parcel Information Last Updated: 10/22/2015 5:00pm http://www.colliertax.com/search/view.php?ID=683925361&page=l&tc=1&taxyear=20... 10/23/2015 Page 1 of l Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No. 00187240000 Site Adr. t ;, il , : I v I S. — [ - 4/1 ` * i 11 9 :sem , I . '.. twee. "' k.,`r.'-, .. . _ }i i r µ. ..:. ,�m..�.. rithip k,4 taft$ , :.` i. ; e' '-.,...._ x j4: ,---N 11 -- Liii'st 1 Y f I Collier.Co` my Prope =Appraised _ 2; . '1 72 0000 Open a GIS Window with More Features. http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00187240000 10/23/2015 Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 00187240000 Site Adr. Name/Address MONAGHAN TR,THOMAS S TREE FARM LAND TRUST 24 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT DR City ANN ARBOR State MI Zip 148105-9484 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated ' 3B22 000100 007 3622 22 I 48 I 26 18.46 Legal 22 48 26 E1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 4413 PG 3838 Millage Area 01222 Millage Rates• *Calculations Sub./Condo 1100-ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 99-ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.48 5.6427 Latest Sales History 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book-Page I Amount Land Value $ 1,795,05 11/16/10 4625-278 $O,i (+) Improved Value $ 09/16/04 3643-3261 $0 { (=) Market Value $ 1,795,051' 09/16/04 3643-3259 $0 08/29/02 3099-3456 $0 (-) 10%Cap $ 678,221 08/29/02 3099-3453 $5,700,000 (=) Assessed Value $ 1,116,830 07/18/98 2441-1144 $ 0 - (_) School Taxable Value $ 1,795,051 07/15/98 2441-1147 $ 2,663,200 i ___..__;. ._ (_) Taxable Value $ 1,116,8301 04/01/84 1344-47 $ 1,293,500 _ _ _ _... ... . If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 04/01/84 1078-1675 $0 http://www.col lierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00187240000 10/23/2015 Search Results Page 1 of 1 Collier County Tax Collector 3291 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL 34112 2014 Tax Roll Inquiry System Print this page Sign up for eBill for an electronic,paperless tax bill in 2015. OWNER INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION Name: MONAGHAN TR,THOMAS S Parcel: 00187240000 Acre: 18.46 Address: TREE FARM LAND TRUST Loc:I NAPLES (Map)(GIS View) Address: 24 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT DR Legal: 22 48 26 E1/2 OF SE1/4 OF Address: Legal:INE1/4,LESS THAT PORTION FOR Address: Legal:IR/W AS DESC IN OR 4413 PG Address: ANN ARBOR,MI 48105-9484 Legal:13838 VALUE/EXEMPTIONS TAX INFORMATION PAY TERMS PAYMENT INFO Market Value: 1,346,301 County: 3648.79 Nov: 12738.06 Paid Dt: 11/26/2014 Taxable Value: 1,015,300 School St: 4485.87 Dec: 12870.75 Recpt: 67865 Millage Code: 222 School loc: 3026.48 Jan: 13003.43 Mach: 9 Homested Ex: 0 City Tax: 0.00 Feb: 13136.12 Paymt: 12,738.06 Agricltr Ex: 0 Dependt: 727.06 Mar: 13268.81 Mort: 0 Widow Ex:[0 Water: 314.44 Apr: .0 STATUS INFO. Blind Ex: 0 Independ: 1,066.17 May: .0 Non Ad Va: N Disabled: 0 Voter Appr: 0.00 Now Due: 0.00 Installment: N Veteran Ex: 0 *Gross Tax: 13268.81 Deferred: N Wholly Ex: 0 Appr fee: .0 Bankrupt: N Civilian Ex: 0 Advertising: 0.00 TDA: 0 COMMENTS New Search Back To List 2003 Parcel Information 12004 Parcel Information 12005 Parcel Information 12006 Parcel Information I 2007 Parcel Information 12008 Parcel Information 12009 Parcel Information I 2010 Parcel Information 12011 Parcel Information I 2012 Parcel Information I 2013 Parcel Information Last Updated: 10/22/2015 5:00pm http://www.colliertax.com/search/view.php?ID=6839253 5 5&page=2&tc=2&taxyear=20... 10/23/2015 ATTACHMENT "J" Ordinance 05-19 — Carolina Village PUD Attachment"J"-Ordinance 05-19 Carolina Village PUD $91 01112X?? iti ro .t4 4Poil& -a 1 VP I ORDINANCE NO.2005- 19 �lZ 9Z00 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS TO CHANGE THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY FROM RURAL AGRICULTURAL "A" TO MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT "MPUD" FOR A DEVELOPMENT TO BE KNOWN AS CAROLINA VILLAGE PUD CONSISTING OF 150,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES AND UP TO =' -, r,, 64 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ' L ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANERVILT BEACH ROAD 1 ABOUT 1/4 MILE WEST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD, 1` -- IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 ' ca EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,CONSISTING OF -- 1 15.88+ACRES;AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE r-,;_ DATE. >r,; w .....` WHEREAS, William Hoover of Hoover Planning and Development Inc., representing Catalina Plaza, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the subject real property in Petition PUDZ-2004-AR-6383. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,that: SECTION ONE: The Zoning Classification of the subject real property described in Section 1.2 of the PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and incorporated by reference herein, located in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "A" Rural Agricultural to "MPUD" Mixed Use Planned Unit Development in accordance with the Carolina Village PUD. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps as described in Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this 2 6 day of A P"I\ ,2005. ATTEST: .. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA � 64: 4AA--1 /1-1441 LA) Cq.k. t {t iK t RK FRED W.COYLE,CHAIRMAN Approved. and and S4II1C1 40146L Patrick G.White Assistant County Attorney • This ordinance filed with the rectory of tote's Offe tFj� ;V day of 11i_ ldbb and acknowledge • that filin• received is cloy- ,••••••••••,of U# �r • I SECTION III MIXED USE AREA PLAN 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identifyspecific development standards for the Mixed Use Areas as shown on Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan. 3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Mixed Use Areas on the PUD Master Plan are intended to provide a variety of retail uses and office uses while providing for the opportunity of having residential uses on the second and/or third floor of mixed use buildings that have commercial uses on at least the first floor. Commercial Areas are limited to a maximum gross leasable area of 150,000 square feet and residential uses are limited to a maximum of 64 dwelling units. 3.3 PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Commercial Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Amusement and Recreation Services (groups 7911, 7991, 7993 only for indoor video game arcade and indoor coin-operated amusement machine, 7999 only for bicycle rental, ice skating rink operation, indoor slot-car track, and miniature golf course). 2. Apparel and Accessory Stores (groups 5611 - 5699). 3. Auto Supply Stores (group 5531 only for automobile accessory dealers and automobile parts dealers. limited to retail sales without any installation). 4. Automobile Parking (group 7521). 5. Paint. Glass. and Wallpaper Stores (group 5231). 6. Business Services (groups 7311. 7313. 7322 - 7338, 7361, 7371 - 7379. 7384, 7389 only for service of interior decorating/design. mapmaking, notary public, paralegal service, and Postal Service contract stations) 7. Depository and Non-Depository Institutions (groups 6021-6199). 8. Eating Places (group 5812) and Drinking Places (group 5813 only cocktail lounges and on-premise consumption of beer, wine and liquor, in conjunction with a restaurant.) Drinking Places are subject to the locational restrictions described in Section 2.6.10 of the Land Development Code. 9. Educational Services (groups 8211 - 8231 (no regional libraries). 10. Food Stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (groups 5411 - 5499). 11. General Merchandise Stores with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (groups 5311 - 5399). 12. Health Services (groups 8011 —8049, 8082). 13. Home Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment Stores (groups 5712 - 5736). 14. Insurance Carriers, Agents, Brokers, and Services with 5,000 square feet or less of gross floor area in the principal structure (groups 6311 - 6399, 6411). 15. Legal Services (group 8111). 16. Membership Organizations (groups 8611, 8621, 8641 - 8661). 17. Miscellaneous Repair (groups 7622, 7629, 7631, 7699 but only bicycle repair, camera repair, locksmiths, luggage repair, medical/ dental instrument repair, musical instrument repair, piano repair, saw/knife sharpening service, and custom picture framing). 18. Miscellaneous Retail (groups 5912, 5921, 5932 (antiques only), 5941 - 5949, 5961, 5962, 5992 - 5999 (except auction rooms, awning shops, fireworks, gravestones, hot tubs, monuments, sales barns, swimming pools, tombstones and whirlpool baths). (The sale of swimming pool accessories and supplies is allowable under 5999. but not the sale of swimming pools.) 19. Motion Picture Theaters and Video Tape Rental (groups 7832 and 7841). 20. Museums and Art Galleriesrou (g p 8412). 9 21. Personal Services (group 7212 dry-cleaning and laundry pickup stations only, 7221 - 7291, 7299 (only car title and tag service, diet workshops, tuxedo rental, massage parlor, and tanning salon). 22. Professional Offices, Research, and Management Consulting Services (groups 8711 - 8743, 8748). 23. Public Administration (groups 9111 - 9199, 9229, 9311, 9411 — 9451, 9511 —9532, 9611 — 9661, 9221). 24. Real Estate Agents and Managers (groups 6512, 6531 - 6552). 25. Security and Commodity Dealers (groups 6211 -6289). 26. Social Services (groups 8322 (only adult day care services, counseling services, and senior citizens associations), 8351). 27. Travel Agencies (group 4724). 28. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal and the accessory uses by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). B. Permitted Residential Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Multi-family dwellings. 2. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal and the accessory uses by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA). C. Accessory Commercial Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the Permitted Uses within this PUD Document. 2. Drinking Places (group 5813 only cocktail lounges and on-premise consumption of beer, wine, and liquor in conjunction with a restaurant.) 3. Caretaker's residences subject to Section 5.03.05 of the Collier County Land Development Code. D. Accessory Residential Uses: In 1. Customary residential accessory uses and structures including carports, garages, and storage buildings. 2. Recreational uses and facilities including swimming pools, hot tubs, volleyball courts, children's playground areas, tot lots, walking paths, picnic areas, clubhouse, verandahs, and basketball/shuffle board courts. 3. Manager's residences and offices, temporary sales trailers, and model units. 4. Gatehouse. 5. Essential services, including interim and permanent utility and maintenance facilities. 6. Carports are permitted within parking areas. 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Carolina Village Mixed Use PUD. Front yard setbacks in Table I shall be measured as follows: 1. If the parcel is served by a public or private right-of-way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. 2. If the parcel is served by a non-platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. If the parcel is served by a platted private drive, the setback is measured from the road easement or property line. ii TABLE I MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STANDARDS COMMERCIAL USES Minimum Lot Area RESIDENTIAL USES 10.000 Sq. Ft. SCU on First Floor Minimum Lot Width 75' (1) Front Yard Setback SCU on First Floor Side Yard Setback (2) 20 SCU on First Floor 1 Story SCU on First Floor 2 Story 7.5' SCU on First Floor 3 Story 10' Rear Yard Setback SCU on First Floor Principal Structure 15' Accessory Structure 10 SCU on First Floor PUD Boundary Setback 10' Principal Structure BH Accessory Structure BH Lake_ S tback (3) 10' or buffer width 10' or buffer width Preserve Area Setback 20'or 0' 20' or 0' Principal Structure 25' Accessory Structures or Other Site 10' 10 Alterations 10' Distance Between Structures Main/Principal 1-Story to 1-Story 12' 1-Story to 2-Story13' 2-Story to 2-Story 13.5' 13.5' 15' 15' 2-Story to 3-Story 17.5' 17.5' 3-Story to 3-Story 20' Accessory Structures 20' Maximum Heiaht 4) Same as principal structure Same as principal structure Retail Building 35' and 1 story NA Office Building 42'and 3 stories Mixed-Use Building (4) 35' NA and 3 stories 45' and 3 stories Accessory Building Minimum Floor Area 35 35' 700 Sq. Ft. of principal structure 500 Sq. Ft. per dwelling unit on first habitable floor (1) May be reduced on cul-de-sac lots and lots along the inside and outside of curved streets by 25%. (2) Where fee simple lots are created for each building unit, no side yard shall be required between interior units of a unified principal structure. and the side yard shall be measured from the exterior wall(s) of the unified principal structure, (3) Lake setbacks are measured from the control elevation established for the lake. Lake setbacks can be reduced from 20' to 0' where a stemwall bulkhead. or pier is constructed and the requirements of Section 4.02.05 of the LDC are met. (4) Retail uses are limited to the first floor of any building. Residential uses are limited to the second and third floors of mixed-use buildings (structures with retail or office uses on the first floor and office or residential uses on the second and third floors) Note 'BH" refers to building height and "SCU" refers to same as the commercial use on the first floor of the mixed-use building the residential use is locatea in I_ SECTION IV PRESERVE AREA PLAN 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the Preserve Areas as shown on Exhibit "A," PUD Master Plan, as may be amended pursuant to Section 5.3. 4.2 PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Passive recreational areas. 2. Biking, hiking, and nature trails, and boardwalks. 3. Water management structures. 4. Native preserves and wildlife sanctuaries. s .3 SS 34 b 12 'I r, ►'o ree ^. $$ lann Condo Pr i i ilAZvaR ed oject q II � 11! !JJ I -'-'T ,m•' 3 t -.t (The Fans Of Portofino) I a f III; � t._ :??fD;i=_-.- ,• „ P•Stine Drive(by others) > > 1 s bi J ea t P =n eurtir 1371 ! , T4: rf z= F II 9 Ill il I I � m irk 14 , in% 3 o I A 9ia;t ! 1 il g deA 717k,Ail 531 1 i; 1 ili III < eq^ I z I33 13 en :1 ; li A .01 ot! 0 ., > 14 5 I : if 211 m L J [--1 m t k" f r 5 X m D D I_ '� r7 u v x a �; c Ipv a _____may O Ti>1 F �9 0 aF a Si * * O s$m Ix = I m i X40&iig IM X ;1:!; a R-; / o d 3 - g X 17 ilaigii clii g $ m I� it om v. p 7r /3 4 Si v P >g 4 1 D 1 1 D 13 es ` 3 W :IlJ ca w 1 i §m33 I RM y9te Hi -� zy 4 _ m ,F'� 8;33■ W 2 m = y ' Hr c sYiYi ya _ mr iti a o "<y n< 1 7>� imm as N $a ' I u,nc n -' N Nl.S In - 5 ynn z In X g ,c (� IJ ` RT Q m2a r- 111 , S 22 n R 03 d 4 %,74s ._ ,,?„ a :„ :... > I O ri RU; n ,, oc, _ D = mi li ..vg y Fl y;.. 'g I XI l,, 1 =AT s S23 a SS a as n z' I -+ : �, 65 F oo u w p 1 + a > 1 �N. (�T Ate ' .Y ]� ie T -c �� ,� - _ ' 2a Butter^0' - J L-20'Buff�r�___ C Ina _-{_I �. _^� --- IP �. �rl c Iv�so •waaeemmr ae',- B a ckst• =D •- (• .- •I• i • others) I 8 g s! go. R. ,-- _ — SIMS .0Z.1•120 S � -- nA 2 y --e..- 41 It IA 66' - y I 114114:41i1114111Tpfl 411! 1 a 4k "11411X3Xplirx111411-111,, -is (,' 111/1/111111111111L 10/111# o g41Ib2/Y x% i if z , ----MI 1 I. 1ge4SY 4F1 'll Mil! q 0 V IMENIE ATTACHMENT "K" Ordinance 11-08 —Addie's Corner MPUD Attachment"K" - Ordinance 11-08 Addie's Corner MPUD ``k �1 ORDINANCE NO. 2011- 08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT v ti DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR r 4 DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 135,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND/OR A RETIREMENT .. 11 COMMUNITY/GROUP HOUSING AT A FAR OF .60 AND/OR ----- HOTEL/MOTEL AT AN INTENSITY OF 26 UNITS PER ACRE FORP:.-; A 23.33+/- ACRE PARCEL TO BE KNOWN AS THE ADDIS'S,,`_i,_ ?" CORNER MPUD, LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OC.- THE II;.THE INTERSECTION OF IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR 846) AN COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951), IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 4/141:74 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Happy #4 Family Corporation, represented by Robert L. Duane, AICP of Hole Montes and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire, of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from a Rural Agricultural (A)Zoning District to a Mixed Usc Planned Unit Development(MPUD)Zoning District to allow for development of up to 135,000 square feet of commercial development and/or a retirement community/group housing at a FAR of.60 and/or a hotel/motel at an intensity of 26 units per acre for a 23.33+/-acre parcel to be known as Addie's Corner MPUD, in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, Addles Corner PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Revised 1/24/I1 Page I oft as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41. as amended, the Collier County Land Development �-. Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,this ]oZ°h day of AO. 1 , 2011. AD 2B M :...- : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS D I,pHT . HktOCK,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA IC\-- -t.._ek tA) C,a,(liz `3 u y Clerk FRED W. COYLE,Chairm test....�ti,, Crurae 01111111441* Oil II Approved as to form. and legal sufficiency: Of° ..----. eidi As ton-Cicko Assistant County Attorney Exhibit A: Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: Requested Deviations from LDC Exhibit F: Developer Commitments 09-CPS-00951,66 This ordinance filed with the Sec gory of St te's ff�e tj', I b ay of_ r �v.Gl and acknowledgement Et that filing rece'ved this 2 day of r - ?Q!, Addies Corner PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Revised L'24111 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT"A" LIST OF PERMITTED USES ADDIES CORNER MPUD No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: I. Tract A-Permitted Commercial Principal Uses: A. Commercial Professional Retail & General Office Permitted Use(Sic In Parenthesis) I. Accident& Health Insurance Services (6321) 2. Accounting, Auditing and Bookkeeping Services (8721) 3. Adjustment services (7322) 4. Advertising (consultants)agencies (7311) 5. Advertising, not elsewhere classified (7319) 6. Agricultural uses (N/A) 7. Architectural services (8712) 8. Auto& Home Supply Stores (5531) 9. Bakeries, Retail (5461) 10. Banks, commercial: national (6021) 11. Banks,commercial: not chartered (6029) 12. Banks, commercial: state (6022) 13. Banks, savings: Federal (6035) 14. Banks, savings: not federally chartered (6036) 15. Barber Shops (7241) 16. Beauty Shops (7231) 17. Book Stores (5942) 18. Business Associations (8611) 19. Business Consulting Services, not elsewhere classified (8748) 20. Camera & Photographic Supply Stores (5946) 21. Candy,Nut&Confectionery Stores (5441) 22. Carpet and Upholstery Cleaning (7217) 23. Civic, Social and Fraternal Associations (8641) 24. Clothing&Accessory Stores, Men's & Boy's (5611) 25. Clothing Stores, Women's (562I) 26. Collection Services (7322) 27. Commodity Contracts Brokers& Dealers (6221) 28. Commercial Art& Graphic Design (7336) 29. Commercial Photography (7335) 30. Commercial Economic, Sociological & Educational Research (8732) 31. Computer& Computer Software Stores (5734) 32. Computer Facilities Management Services (7376) 33. Computer Maintenance and Repair (7378) 34. Computer Processing & Data Preparation Services (7374) 35. Computer Programming services (7371) Addles Comer MPUD PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Last revised:03-02-I I Page 1 of 12 36. Computer Rental& Leasing (7377) 37. Credit Reporting Services (1323) „--. 38. Credit Unions, Federal (6061) 39. Credit Unions, State: not federally chartered (6062) 40. Dairy Products Stores (5451) 41. Data Processing Consultants (7379) 42. Dance Studios, Schools& Halls (7911) 43. Data Processing Services (7374) 44. Dental Laboratories (8072) 45. Dentist Office/Clinic (8021) 46. Direct mail advertising service (7331) 47. Direct Selling Establishments (5%3) 48. Doctors -Medicine Offices&Clinics (8011) 49. Doctors-Osteopathy Offices&Clinics (8031) 50. Doctors -Chiropractors Offices&Clinics (8041) 51. Drapery,Curtain& Upholstery Stores (5714) 52. Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages); Bottle Clubs and Cabarets (5813) are not permitted 53. Drug Stores (5912) 54. Eating Places (5812) 55. Engineering services: industrial, civil, electrical, mechanical, marine (8711) and design 56. Executive Offices (9111) 57. Executive& Legislative Offices Combined (9131) 58. Fire, Marine& Casualty Insurance Services (6331) 59. Floor Covering Stores (5713) 60. Florists (5992) 61. Food Stores, Miscellaneous (5499) 62. Foreign Branches &Agencies of Banks (6081) 63. Foreign Trade & International Banking Institutions (6082) 64. Furniture Stores (5712) 65. Funeral home or parlor (7261) 66. Gasoline Service Stations (5541) 67. General Government, not elsewhere classified (9199) 68. Gift,Novelty&Souvenir Shops (5947) 69. Grocery Stores (5411) 70. Hair weaving or Replacement Services (7299) 71. Hardware Store (5251) 72. Health practitioners-not elsewhere classified (8049) 73. Hobby, Toy& Games Shops (5945) 74. Home health care services (8082) 75. Hotels& Motels (701 1) 76. Household Appliance Stores (5722) 77. Hospital& Medical Healthy Services (6324) 78. Information Retrieval Services (7375) 79. Insurance Carriers, not elsewhere classified (6399) 80. Investment Advice (6282) 81. Jewelry Stores (5944) 82. Land Subdividers& Developers (6552) 83. Landscape architects,consulting&planning (0781) 84. Laundries(Coin Operated)&Dry-cleaning (7215) Addles Corner MPUD PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Last rcv:sad:03-02-11 Page 2 of 12 85. Legal services (8111) 86. Libraries (except regional libraries) (8231) 87. Life Insurance Services (6311) 88. Liquor Stores (5921) 89. Loan brokers (6163) 90. Luggage & Leather Goods Stores (5948) 91. Management Services (8741) 92. Management Consulting Services (8742) 93. Markets, Meat& Fish (Seafood) Markets (5421) 94. Markets, Fruit& Vegetable Markets (5431) 95. Medical Equipment Rental & Leasing (7352) 96. Medical Laboratories (8071) 97. Membership Organizations, not elsewhere classified (8699) 98. Miscellaneous amusement and recreational services not elsewhere (7999) classified. Only judo instruction, karate instruction, moped rental, motorcycle rental, rental of bicycles, scuba and skin diving instruction are permitted 99. Miscellaneous Business Credit Institutions (6159) 100. Miscellaneous General Merchandise Stores (5399) 101. Miscellaneous Home Furnishings Stores (5719) 102. Miscellaneous personal services, not elsewhere classified excluding (7299) massage parlors, steam baths,tattoo parlors and Turkish baths. 103. Miscellaneous Retail Stores, not elsewhere classified (5999) 104. Mortgage Bankers& Loan Correspondents (6162) 105. Musical Instrument Stores (5736) 106. News Dealers& Newsstands (5994) 107. Nondeposit Trust Facilities (6091) 108. Optical Goods Stores (5995) 109. Optometrists-offices& clinics (8042) 110. Paint, Glass& Wallpaper Stores (5231) I 1 I. Pension, Health and Welfare Funds Services (6371) 112. Personal Credit Institutions (6141) 113. Photocopying& Duplicating Services (7334) 114. Photographic Studios, Portrait (7221) 115. Photofinishing Laboratories (7384) 116. Physical Fitness Facilities (permitted only when physically integrated (7991) and operated in conjunction with another permitted use in this district -no stand alone facility permitted) 117. Podiatrists-offices&clinics (8043) 118. Political Organizations (8651) 119. Professional Membership Organizations (8621) 120. Professional Sports Clubs& Promoters (7941) 121. Public Relations Services (8743) 122. Radio, Television& Consumer Electronics Stores (5731) 123. Radio, Television& Publishers Advertising Representatives (7313) 124. Real Estate Agents and Managers (6531) 125. Record & Prerecorded Tape Stores; adult video rental or sales (5735) prohibited 126. Religious Organizations (8661) 127. Repair Shops& Related Services, not elsewhere classified (7699) - 128. Retail Nurseries, Lawn & Garden Supply Stores (5261) Addie Corner MPUD PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Last revised:03-02-11 Page 3 of 12 129. Secretarial and Court Reporting Services (7338) 130. Security Brokers, Dealers& Flotation Companies (621 I) 131. Security and Commodity Exchanges (6231) 132. Sewing,Needlework& Piece Goods Stores (5949) 133. Services Allied with the Exchange of Securities or Commodities, not (6289) elsewhere classified 134. Shoe Repair Shops and Shoeshine Parlors (7251) 135. Short-Term Business Credit Institutions,except agricultural (6153) 136. Social Services, Individual & Family (activity centers, elderly or (8322) handicapped only;day care centers for adult& handicapped only) 137. Sporting Goods Stores & Bicycle Shops (5941) 138. Stationery Stores (5943) 139. Stores,Children's and Infants Wear (5641) I40. Stores,Family Clothing (5651) 141. Stores,Miscellaneous Apparel &Accessory (5699) 142. Stores, Shoes (5661) 143. Stores, Women's Accessory& Specialty (5632) 144. Surety Insurance Services (6351) 145. Surveying Services (8713) 146. Tanning Salons (7299) 147. Tax Return Preparation Services (7291) 148. Title Abstract Offices (6541) 149. Title Insurance Services (6361) 150. Tobacco Stores& Stands (5993) 151. Travel Agencies(no other transportation services) (4724) 152. Used Merchandise Stores (5932) 153. Veterinary services for animal specialties (0742) 154. Video Tape Rental,adult video rental or sales prohibited (7841) 155. Watch, Clock&Jewelry Repair (7631) II. Tract A- Permitted Group Housing/Retirement Community/Principal Uses: A. Group Housing, 8051 Skilled Nursing, Intermediate Care Facilities 8052, Nursing and Personal Care not else classified 8059. B. Independent Living Units C. Assisted Living Units D. Retirement Community III. Tract A—Permitted Accessory Uses: Accessory uses customarily associated with the permitted principal uses, including, but not limited to: A. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the permitted uses within this MPUD document. Addies Corner MPUD PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Last revised:03-02-11 Page 4 or 12 B. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. C. Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing by the Board of Zoning Appeals, pursuant to the process outlined in the LDC. IV. Tract B—Permitted Preserve Area Uses: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for the preserve area depicted on the MPUD Master Plan, that is required to be a minimum of 8.85 acres, other than those uses allowed by Section 3.05.07 H.l.h. of the LDC, or any successor provision. V. Group Housing/Retirement Community Commitments: The developer of the group housing/retirement community, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and be subject to the following operational standards for the units in the retirement community, including but not limited to, independent living units, assisted living units or skilled nursing units: l. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older. 2. There shall be on-site dining for the residents. 3. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services may be provided for the residents' individualized needs including but not limited to medical office visits. 4. There shall be an on-site manager/activities coordinator to assist residents with their individual needs. The manager/coordinator shall also be responsible for arranging trips to off-site events as well as planning for lectures, movies, music and other entertainment for the residents at the on-site clubhouse. 5. A wellness center shall be provided on-site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall be provided for the residents. 6. Each unit shall be equipped to notify emergency service providers in the event of medical or other emergency. 7. Each unit shall be designed so that a resident can age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted to lower the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted to add grab bars. Addles Corner MPUD PUDZ-2009-AR-14425 Last revised,03-02-11 Page 5 of 12 P 0 V. r 8 Ii ' o1i I!, 8 \ i' 111 `1` 2;I! .:. . iIii r—i 1 Ii ! b" ;n� I P c„,... i o Y ;. _ j (9J} 3lV�UW } , ln ____ ___ Wi i r - -- -- 1 -`' " `-_---,_- - I! ---------— — - -- MAW RIDS-#1� .''r..C� - ..�.a ris — — —_ sem.----- 0. ail k.11.*&411,79 '� \ lig 1 \ 0 a as a 4 ,, 1- ��� g R 8 ��, X111 lIq. I.\:‘,:: 1 \ 1, if :91 is� z kkgkb ,-. iv ‘i 0 ht 41 ! 11 i 0 " ���le r. .•\ .� � 1... .'�. '\N � ;:: ;: a s! g a • k\ Jj • 8 „ , . \ „ . , ., . ... \ .., s . \ \ , \ \ \ ' i • < a I �I1d , \ ‘ \\,\\ .\\ ._ , 1 i \ \ \ \ y - =`� ` 11°1 ! ii` as ! I to I0... k \\ I 1 zt 1,,, 1 . , Wk-yoof. ' .63 Lu • I a iiii I ' A a s W /1111 Via . • JzLr «h ----- -- 11. 111=1 r----- . li 11 it l{` 'i ?� Nil L. i _ - __-M. -fie _-- i � # il Pj at Z r l ATTACHMENT "L" Ordinance 07-54—Treefarm MPUD Attachment"L"-Ordinance 07-54 Treefarm MPUD 189R4111z j3�Qjs� i 'F t�� 02 ORDINANCE NO.07- 54 10‘..)1kN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY �8zttsz5zOMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE AGRICULTURAL (A)ZONING DISTRICT TO THE MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(MPUD)ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE TREE FARM MPUD CONSISTING OF A MAXIMUM OF 175,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES AND A MAXIMUM OF 425 RESIDENTIAL UNITS - LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR 846)AND COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951), IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,CONSISTING OF 58.84±ACRES;AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Robert Mulhere, AICP, of RWA, Inc., representing the Tree Farm Land Trust, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property, known as petition PUDZ-2005-AR- 8284. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Agricultural (A)Zoning District to the Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development(MPUD) Zoning District for a project to be known as Tree Farm MPUD consisting of a maximum of 175,000 square feet of commercial uses and a maximum of 425 residential units in accordance with the Tree Farm MPUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 24, day of ,2007. PUDZ-2005-AR-8284/MD/sp 1 of 2 ,•p S,T: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ::..DARGHT.VR IC,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA fL By: int �„i 1, ` Clerk J - COLETTA,CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: l�r,++��rr�u� tarjoriedvt.Student-Stirling Assistant County Attorney This ordinonce fi'ed with the Secretary of State's Office th _.day of=Tit e-afiYj and acknowledgement of that filin eived this `Tie-1day of 1Ift� -3- PUDZ-2005-AR 8284/MD/sp 2 of 2 Deputy cis SECTION III COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE DISTRICT(C) 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development plan for areas designated as District "C", Commercial on Exhibit "A", MPUD Master Plan. The general function and purpose of this District is to provide the opportunity for diverse types of commercial activities that deliver goods and services, including entertainment and recreational attractions, to many segments of the population. 3.2 MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL/OFFICE SQUARE FEET AND MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL DEVLOPMENT The 18.69 ± acre commercial area (District "C"), is limited to a maximum of 175,000 square feet of commercial/office uses, of which a maximum of 143,500 square feet may be retail and the balance (above 143,500 square feet) is limited to office use. A minimum of 5,000 square feet shall be developed with professional or medical office use. A minimum of 15 percent of the density generated from the Activity Center acreage shall be developed within the Commercial-Mixed-Use District, and the balance of the density generated from the Activity Center acreage may be developed within 1/3 mile of the Activity Center boundary. No more that 50% of the allowable commercial square footage may be developed prior to the development of at least one-half of the minimum required dwelling units within the Activity Center, and no more that 75% of the maximum allowable commercial square footage may be developed prior to the development of the remaining 50% of the minimum required residential dwelling units within the Activity Center. 3.3 PERMITTED USES No building or structure, or part thereof; shall be erected, altered or used, or land used in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses': 1. Group 0742 — Veterinary services for animal specialties (except outdoor kennel) 2. Establishments furnishing point-to-point communications services as outlined under Major Group 48 in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual; no communication towers are permitted. 3. Group 5231 —Paint glass, and wallpaper stores; 4. Group 5251 —Hardware stores; 'Reference Executive Office of the President,Office of Management and Budget,Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987 Edition. C:\Documents and Settings\sandtaherrera\Local Settings\Tengorary Internet Files\OLIO C92007-07-02 MPUD(final County attorney revisions).doc 13 of 26 5. Group 5261 —Retail nurseries,lawn and garden supply stores; 6. Major Group 53—General merchandise stores. 7. Major Group 54- Food stores. 8. Group 5531 — Auto and home supply stores, not including any installation facility; 9. Group 5541 —Gasoline stations, not including service facilities; 10. Group 7542—Carwashes only. 11. Industry Group 555—Boat dealers. 12. Major Group 56—Apparel and accessory stores. 13. Major Group 57—Home furniture, furnishings, and equipment stores. 14. Major Group 58—Eating and drinking places. 15. Major Group 59 — Miscellaneous Retail. Industry Group Numbers: 596 — nonstore retailers; 598—and not including retail sale of fireworks. 16. Major Groups 60, excluding 6099 check cashing agencies, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, and 67 in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual. 17. Group 7011 — Hotels and motels. The maximum floor area ratio for hotels shall not exceed a factor of 0.60. 18 Establishments operating primarily to provide personal services for the following Industry groups: a. 721 —Laundry, cleaning, and garment services, only including Group 7211 —power laundries, family and commercial, Group 7215 — Coin-operated laundries and dry-cleaning, and Group 7217 — carpet and upholstery cleaning; b. 722—Photographic portrait studios; c. 723—Beauty shops d. 724—Barber shops; e. 725—Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors; f. 729 — Miscellaneous personal services, only including Group 7291 Tax return preparation services, and Group 7299 personal services, not elsewhere classified, only including car title and tag service, computer photography or portraits, costume rental, diet workshops, electrolysis (hair removal), genealogical investigation service, hair weaving or replacements service, dress suit or tuxedo rental, and tanning salons. C:1Doctunents and Settings,sandraherreralocal SettingstTenyorary Internet Fiks1OLKI C912007-07-02 MP1;D(final County attorney revisions).doc 14 of 26 19. Establishments operating primarily to provide business services for the following Industry Groups: a. 731 — Advertising, not including Group 7312 outdoor advertising services agencies; b. 733 — Mailing, reproduction, commercial art and photography, and stenographic services; c. 735—Group 7352—medical equipment rental and leasing; d. 737 — Computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services, not including Group 7371 — computer programming services. 20. Establishments primarily engaged in developing film and in making photographic prints and enlargements for the trade or for the general public, only including Group 7384, photofinishing laboratories. 21. Group 7513 — Truck rental and leasing, without drivers; Group 7514 — passenger car rental; Group 7515 —passenger car leasing; and Group 7519 — utility trailer and recreational vehicle rental. 22. Group 7631 — Watch, clock, and jewelry repair, and Group 7699 — repair shops and related services,not elsewhere classified. 23. Group 7832 — motion picture theaters, except drive-in, and Group 7841 — video tape rental. 24. Major Group 79 — Amusement and recreation services, for the following industry numbers: a. Group 7911 —Dance studios, schools and halls b. Group 7922—Theatrical producers (except motion picture) and Group miscellaneous theatrical services c. Group 7941 —Professional sports clubs and promoters, only including managers of individual professional athletes, and promoters of sports events. d. Group 7991 —Physical fitness facilities e. Group 7999 — Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified, to include moped rental, motorcycle rental, rental of bicycles, schools and camps-sports instructional, scuba and skin diving instruction, sporting goods rental only. 25. Major Group 80—Health services for the following industry groups: a. 801 --Offices and clinics of doctors of medicine; b. 802—Offices and clinics of dentists; c. 803 —Offices and clinics of doctors of osteopathy; d. 804—Offices and clinics of other health practitioners. 26. Major Group 807—Medical and dental laboratories for the following industry numbers: a. Group 8071 —Medical laboratories; C:1Documenls and Settings\sandraherrera\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Filers\OLKIC9\2007-07-02 MPIJI(final County attorney revisions).do c 15 of 26 b. Group 8072—Dental laboratories. 27. Establishments operating primarily to provide legal services as defined under Major Group 81. 28. Group 8231 —Libraries. 29. Membership organizations engaged in promoting the interests of their member as defined under Major Group 86. 30. Establishment operating primarily to provide engineering, accounting, research, and management for the following Industry Numbers: a. Group 8711 —Engineering services b. Group 8712—Architectural services c. Group 8713 —Surveying services d. Group 8721 —Accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services e. Group 8732 — Commercial economic, sociological, and educational research f. Group 8741 Management services g. Group 8742—Management consulting services h. Group 8743 --Public relations services i. Group 8748--Business consulting services. 31. Offices of government as defined under Major Group 91 — Executive, legislative, and general government, except finance. 32 Residential multi-family dwelling units, whether in a free standing residential building or located in a mixed commercial and residential building. Mixed use buildings shall adhere to the development standards set forth in Table III below. Residential units shall not be located on the first floor of a mixed use building, and shall be subject to a minimum per unit floor area of 1,000 square feet. Residential buildings with no commercial component shall adhere to the development standards set forth in Table IV. B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage 2. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the permitted uses within this MPUD Document. 3. One caretaker's residence. C:IDocmnents and Settings\sandrabe cra Local Settings\Tengorary Internet Files\OLKICO 2007-07.02 MPUD(fmal County attorney revisions).doc 16 of 26 SECTION IV RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R) 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify specific development standards for areas designated as "R" on the MPUD Master Plan, Exhibit "A". Residential uses, infrastructure, perimeter land use buffers, signage, as well as project recreationaUsocial facilities will occur within this District. 4.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS The maximum number of residential dwelling units allowed within the MPUD shall be established at the time of development plan review, but shall not exceed 425 residential dwelling units. Since 15% of the density generated from the Activity Center acreage are required to be developed within the Commercial Mixed Use District,and the remaining density generated from the Activity Center acreage must be developed within 1/3 mile of the Activity Center boundary (as depicted on Exhibit A, the MPUD Master Plan), the remainder of the dwelling units may be developed north of the line on the MPUD demarcating the 1/3 mile distance from the Activity Center boundary. For the purpose of calculating the project density, 4 assisted living facilities (ALF) units shall constitute 1 residential dwelling unit and the maximum number of ALF units shall not exceed 150 units. 4.3 USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single-family attached dwellings (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance); 2. Zero lot line dwellings; 3. Single-family detached dwellings; 4. Duplexes, two-family dwellings; 5. Multiple-family dwellings; 6. ALF with ancillary medical uses and personal services for residents and their guests, including but not limited to, beauty salon, bank, pharmacy and convenience store. (Such ancillary medical or personal service uses shall only be accessed from inside the ALF (no exterior access), and shall not exceed 2,000 square feet in aggregate. No external signage or advertising shall be permitted in support of these ancillary medical or personal service uses. C:\Documents and Seuings\student_m\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKt54\2007-07-02 MYUD(final County attorney revisions).doc 18 of 26 B. Accessory Uses: 1. Customary accessory uses and structures including,but not limited to clubhouses, private garages, swimming pools with, or without screened enclosures, tennis courts, tot lots,playgrounds and other outdoor recreation facilities. 4.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. B. Minimum Residential Density within Activity Center: A minimum of 15 percent of the density generated from the Activity Center shall be constructed within the 18.69 acre Mixed Use Activity Center portion of the project, and the balance of the density accumulated from the Activity Center may be developed within 1/3 mile of the northern boundary of the Activity Center, or within the Activity Center. THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK C:1Documents and SettingstsandraherreeatLocal Settings\Tenporary Internet Files\OLKIC9`2007-07-02 MPUD(final Canty attorney nevisiona).doc 19 of 26 SECTION V PRESERVE AREA(P) 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to set forth the development plan for areas designated as District "P", Preserve Area on Exhibit "A", MPUD Master Plan. The primary function and purpose of this District is to preserve and protect vegetation and naturally functioning habitats, such as wetlands, including upland buffers, in their natural, and/or enhanced state. 5.2 USES PERMITTED A. Principal Uses: 1. Open spaces/nature preserves. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Water management structures. 2. Mitigation areas. 3. Passive recreational uses such as pervious nature trails or boardwalks shall be allowed within the preserve areas, as long as any clearing required to facilitate these uses does not impact the minimum required vegetation. For the purpose of this Section, passive recreational uses are those uses that would allow limited access to the preserve in a manner that will not cause any negative impacts to the preserve, such as pervious pathways, benches and educational signs. Fences may be utilized outside of the preserve to provide protection of the preserve in accordance with the applicable requirements set forth in the LDC. Fences and walls shall not be permitted within the preserve area. Perimeter berms and swales shall be located outside preserve boundaries. C. The .51 acre preserve tract depicted on the MPUD Master Plan shall be re-vegetated in compliance with MPUD Exhibit "D", Compliance Agreement, and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the LDC. CADocuments and Settingstsandraherrera\Local SettingsVfemporary Internet Files\OLKlC912007-07-02 MPUD(final County attorney revisions).doc 22 of 26 SECTION VI DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 6.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of the project. 6.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in accordance with SDP, subdivision plans (if required), and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this MPUD. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the LDC shall apply to this project, even if the land within the MPUD is not to be platted. The developer, its successors and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this Document. The developer, its successors or assignee, shall follow the Master Development Plan and the regulations of the MPUD, as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successors or assignee in title to the developer are bound by any commitments within this Document. These commitments may be assigned or delegated to a condominium/homeowners' association to be created by the developer. Upon assignment or delegation, the developer shall be released from responsibility for the commitments. 6.3 TRANSPORTATION The development of this MPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer and Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. B. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County rights-of- way or easements, compensating right-of-way shall be provided without cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement. C. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public right-of-way or easement is determined to be necessary, the fair share cost of such improvement shall be borne by the developer. CADoeuments and Settings Nsandrahencra\Local Settings\Tettporary Internet FilesIOLKIC912oo7-07-02 MPUD(final County attorney revisions).doc 23 of 26 D. The applicant shall reserve rights-of-way for the future Collier Boulevard extension and Immokalee Road expansion and intersection improvements as depicted on the MPUD Master Plan (Right-of-way Reservations Tracts A, B, and C, totaling 7.42 +/- acres). The applicant shall receive impact fee credits in exchange for Right-of-way Reservation Tract B (0.47 acres), but shall not receive impact fee credits for the reservation and eventual dedication of Right-of-way Reservation Tracts A and C. The applicant shall convey by deed, in fee simple, at no cost to the County (other than the aforementioned impact fee credits for Tract B)all lands reserved as depicted on the MPUD Master Plan (as noted herein) within 90 days of written request of the County. E. The applicant shall construct a twelve foot (12') asphalt greenway within the Immokalee Road canal right-of-way, or within the adjacent right-of-way reservation area, at the discretion of the Collier County Transportation Services Division. The greenway shall be located on the north side of the canal and shall connect to the greenway that Collier County is constructing to the west of the Tree Farm MPUD property. The developer shall provide five (5) parking spaces for public use in close proximity to and accessible from the greenway. These parking spaces may be located within the Commercial Tract, and may be located within the Right-of-way Reservation Tract "A" on a temporary or permanent basis, with approval from Collier County Transportation Services Division. The greenway shall be constructed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy(CO) within the MPUD. F. The applicant shall design the project stormwater management system so as to accept and treat stormwater from fifty percent (50%) of the impervious area of proposed extension of Collier Boulevard adjacent to the Tree Farm MPUD, in accordance with South Florida Water Management District permitting requirements. G. The applicant shall be responsible for fair share costs of improvements to the Immokalee Road/Collier Boulevard intersection, including bridge replacement and/or widening as may be necessary to construct a minimum of two north and two southbound through lanes as well as necessary turn lanes. H. The applicant shall ensure that any easements necessary to facilitate interconnections to properties to the west as shown on the MPUD Master Plan shall be granted by the appropriate instrument(s) at the time of submittal of the first development order application. No certificate of occupancy(CO) for development within the Tree Farm MPUD will be issued until 6 laning of the following roadway segments has been substantially completed(that is fully open to traffic): 1. Immokalee Road from Collier Boulevard west to I-75 2. Immokalee Road from Collier Boulevard East to 43rd Avenue N.W. 3. Collier Boulevard from Immokalee Road south to Golden Gate Boulevard. C:1Documents and Settingslsandraherrera\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKIC912007-07-02 MPUD(final County attorney revisions).doc 24 of 26 J. Should it become necessary or desirable to construct a wall to mitigate the impacts of noise from Collier Boulevard or Immokalee Road, the developer shall be responsible for the costs of designing and installing said wall or walls for the portion adjacent to the project boundary. 6.4 UTILITIES The development of this MPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. The developer shall reserve two areas to be granted as easements to Collier County for raw water wells. The dimensions of these well easements shall not to exceed 100 feet by 100 feet. The approximate location of these well easements is depicted on the MPUD Master Plan. The northerly raw water well easement site is located at the northeastern corner of the MPUD, and can be accessed from Immokalee Road Extension. There are two possible locations for the southerly raw water well easement site, Option A is located on the westerly boundary of the project, south of the "P" Preserve Tract, and is adjacent to an internal drive which, if selected, will include the necessary access and utility easements. Option B is located at the southeast corner of the project and is located adjacent to Right-of-way Reservations Tracts A and B, and can be accessed from Immokalee Road Extension. The grant of these easements shall occur at the time of site development plan or final plat approval for the area within the development phase that contains the respective well easement sites. At the time of the site development plan and/or final plat submittal, the developer shall provide the well site easement that meets the standard setback requirements for water wells. The developer shall also provide a temporary access easement within Right-of-way Reservation Tract C should the Collier County Utilities Division require access to the well sites prior to the grant of said right-of- way to Collier County. 6.5 ENVIRONMENTAL A. The development shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USF&WS) and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) regarding potential impacts to "listed species". A Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Management Plan shall be submitted to Environmental Services Staff for review and approval prior to site plan/construction plan approval. Where protected species are observed on site, a Habitat Management Plan for those protected species, or their habitats shall be submitted to Environmental Services Staff for review and approval prior to site plan/construction plan approval. 6.6 AFFORDABLE-WORKFORCE HOUSING: A. The applicant shall provide 15% of the total units built in the project in the affordable housing price range or workforce housing, i.e., for those who earn up to 150% of the median income as calculated annually using the Collier County median C:\Docwrenls and Settings\saodrahertera\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files 10LKIC9\2007-07-02 MPUD(final County attorney revisions).doc 25 of 26 income figure for a family of four as determined by the United States Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD). The applicant will use the most current median income figure as defined above at the time of sale to determine if that unit falls into the 150% median income or below. Currently, that would allow a sales price of up to $321,000. The applicant will provide verification of the sales prices to Collier County's Housing and Human Services Department. The form of verification shall be determined between the applicant and the Collier County Housing and Human Services Division. B. The applicant shall make voluntary contributions to the Collier County Affordable Housing Trust Fund of$1,000 per dwelling unit and $0.50 per commercial square foot built in the project. THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK C::lpocuments and Seuingsliandraberrera\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Fitts\OLKIC9 2007-07-02 MPUI)(final County attorney revisions).doc 26 of 26 T ..--.-- I r r t i i ra+. ii n 1 1 f II t = t ! _ 5 o n �. ,� 0 r .r I kI b, I�iI'4 ! I W SI on / p r Z I I II- Ft I 3 IL H t 7ax5 Iv zH FR o hl i g o l+1 rtill N uj /" C4 (.) '5131> r i 1R5 ,:10,7—iii-waiiiima i=irii, 4 . ...... ,. 1. 4 T j -1. N D ;-.-P 1 ' . \ , ii 41c. z 5 12Ve r\*' ri�� :Sti 'T _v. ii;i• t iiV i I — — I Nosimars-mtraom VW 3141011E11111i i g 7----- / — VIVIANII and 7y _ . t , ti IR '1 .7 ..., • ._(...i,, 122...4.,a....!__ s f ifv ;: [ , , - 1-_--i.,---- - 1 ii3 t 0 ,i r — 4111. . . ii I • o I: 2...._..1........ ............ -,,..,.4----4----). ./.44' I • _ -•--. -- --/4-- m il il I , i •, 1 . 1 i 1 i't 1 i 1- 1 1- 1 e IN, Is 1 ! ¢,!:: 1 14 r::•/ .. W-- 1141 14 911 .1 x 1 si :: , _ I FA, :. 1... ...4_,--z—=_.=_-:-._',4__---44,- 1 —4,• .fo----, : 0• ,. 1 0 f 1 I- fri A, m 4 4' 1 'i i 'l i d 11 jj g )/7 f 1_1*..,_-;. .4 h-iN r ri I. :I 0 : 0 111 1 # . T Jill! P :1' ± 4.lig 0 Ili IL _c_L —1 0 ) iiiill m i .';':1- ."4:i= # ' 1[:iiiiiiiii) i 1 - ---- Miti 1 - I 0 , I .i y r7g 0 jg 1 -,-1 i • ,: -, i i• I---.4.?-L-.---&___ i — 11 ., Mil •":Li I ; f __ -01 - -K ' ---L— - 1‘,... ii 1 lit L. 'I v Oi •1 I I 4 til i iq -lit. , . • . ' i— 1:•. -------1--- 1! c > F171 I .------- .... , 09? 51.1 .4! r, -.--\ I ! fugo.i. , , / 11;t iii ',1 1 1 1 ! t ON . i . // tTl . 1 . . 6! ------,. .,-i-,s , r i I 11 •$0,./,, vt „ ,,.. , ._ 0 4 4 I T(.1 al '..* 0 ial4"akilXii ! 94-4 giOtii llipi iT z 4 1,,, ilf.4;!,!wil 1%; : .5.,, .,,x5i, „„e ...,.., - --+- ----r1 - e 419611463! 1 Ilfit ilf,' 4f5k i! A , Ili E 1,ri: ,5, .- .°AXE-. :, i ill sr.• s v.: .7..,v, 4 I i ... i , . I : i 3.-0 -,.51 .;. I A m I ' I . 1 I 1 I I I S: 14 1:- Vt. 600g r. 773'6 Wg 4'; i I 1 11 1 i P '1! l' 01114111 1 , 140 :Of AM I e '• 1 1 , IAi I 1 i 11 i A r .: , 4fP: : , ii i R .f g :'.4-'r- =i 1 f-Ni i5t4A iFC"X ,. _ A A. ,-.1 Pi - .,; .I. -Ft - :A 1 SIS..g .------- ) hkg ii__.,..._, i , 'r i .... ; ..—./...—A 7 1 ag• ' ; ,: 92 PiRip 7:4:f < , :i :. 4:: fe i. - ,4 :MI --.,- -4 !,'-' ''' '7.ii ii.P 0 ; ;"qt*Sf,,, --,,---e4: I ' .-----7- - --- t---- -. i ,-.. .., ro...a ,C- : 4 1 WAIN ono - - - " :1 '';7 .7, ge i ! - t. At .' .ag tk 1 4 FIgg15: '..77' r: WI 6 E ;!, ;: ,44 ....i 'Fri .. ,_ !.4-;:f;,1: ?!:,...;'• - . u .. I ' ..b o %., • 1 ''- '.- ab V t ,z 4 3..f 'iE: z' 0-1 : ' I 4 , ioi „ r i I ''` ! 1 ,. Iill, ”if - -, it -' 't' o n' *; i .FH 4'--' a .4: —. A A EXHIBIT"A" TRLE FARM TA wc. '— •- LAND TRUST TREE FARM MPUD DIA/A P1-4 v.u.u.d.. ... — ..., CONSULTING Ord Embed', .,-......, ''-'•:-:"" MPUD MASTER PLAN _L.. , TA. .A. surverias&minims ..... I 3 �Tf� — /051.VO ,S 11111001,13/1i],M1 3f11501.43,151334^• ; i '' ' S•.....» -__-__ '0Mv11yy and '1 01'011 33T310Nn I ii } i( r I j I l i`, •� ___,• __(n 2 .i 1099!e„•5'saie_ I I { 1 , Vf M j R t i i ! tr... ` 4:, _ I a i P � • '3 II l X `i,/ 1 : ` 164) tris +. ,,...„ I R -3p P t Sc 1�a�"# r"� 1 4 S 31 1 I4 It "P> Ii f R I C : i .„, O'lz F. L.` I r . ,1 " i opt {7 i' \\\ s r' - CrJ r t # ; �t fiL `L Zi I 11 kik " _ _ ism), -3 " � :'f�--w��_ : 1 i 1,3 ii r-_4g:=-t1.-1 I I� r (l,a 1 q RR pith f lI , A '• lrl ____:c....... ii. P? e7 I I / I wI � ,-„:// - II . .: 1, , ., , , , \ p ;,,. 4 t 1 Y11 . - f J - y ' 4 C) � t—li � _ 1 � • ! ' rri I : z'= pq 4 1 I.li.1, i i 'Z.I _ r, I z I ti II 1 1 i 1 . fr, is:59 — — . • A { .., LANA TR VST TREE FARM MPUD DYX/ \mac CONSULTING • " CONCEPTUAL WATER t II. r rt a Stroying&fit .. ."• •' MANAGE•MENTPL4.\ "I' 77, I - E 1 i E I , uIr. - . I '. ... - `lid a� I 1i r • K M _r a S e. A 11"1 H i 13 1'oa-_on�bnaao . .,• ., 4 - -ems • .. vaa's 1 g n •o .,"rho.'l',4,14$4 H 1.4 OA P r p.' ",' r p Z .1 g eeoaaaaa �YcC¢ e'_ _."1 " p.IMOS 10i2,111-1t leo- /71 mD01:11ppp909aa40 N - 7 — — �_ ri o`.0014 !/ __ �' — _ v I I--I . ., 1 ki g II 1:10001:198f veto ^ l''r-- I M1 ; ---, .1- .,_,, i Mil C4 rrl oa oa , RI° 071 Po aoaaaa 1o'il! ' ,! EM. aoaoao '7!i , I�poabao- 3 - In O �•_ *11 `rJ i I f 1 I u, I 4 4 , z � . � - MI 4 i . i : n r1 N 1 mi1 tz [i i — HJ --- :: .. TREE FARM I .,-.,, LAND TRUST TREE FARM MPUD CONCEPTUAL WATER e1 ti I 1_' uu,..`Sunnv.n rc\la[lx Z L V I 1 I...men,lkojrn\Ianalgn MANAGEWENT PLAN .. ._......: .,,......,,.. i .,_..._. , — -I"' • —1 /....*N, . .c n ri..1 ?4,, tP...1 1 ,....., 1 I-7•7! . i 10. I I I to I 0, • I I . 1 , I ;At II-IIIN.1 1 1 :',..,I .,,,,...0 :,!IA I: ! - I I . ,... •‹ z-F . I 01 i 1,, . . 1.7 410 . •1 Y3 7: - '1 , ..1 6 --- 1 • i 1,-, 1 : ,- 5. 1 , 1 • . il ''t C , ..-11.• I 1 I . , r,r !/ .:, • . i. .:. 1 ..• . • n i • ' I Cr;Pc '7::1:-; '%1 ..'''. 1 gi v It r 1 ,,t x, 1, --. 17, I Ai n-• 1 i. 1. ;'..1'Z':J•.' : F 11 .. II .-• ,. li Ii I;z:,..' II :-•X -I 12 II .1 II •,..; c .... I I " I II i_____.—i 1:..T..-: 1 1 1 1 . i • I r"\ , . i .. .. EAR. s, LAND TRUST TREE FARM MPUD .. . ., •s i . , • 1.1.19Itir:•,4,11(1 1,1.&Mappus 0••I,.... (ROSS SECT-DNS 11 IL 11 V./. JL ii..r.i,..,rn. .... c.‘it.n,,xas ..,.., . • . ..c... r.,,,......”. .,... ....,... .......•••....•kaw.w..•••••,.......—..—...- .._.. __.......... .*....... ....... • • STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of : ORDINANCE 2007-54 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 26th day of June, 2007, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 2nd day of July, 2007 . DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk. ' Ex-officio to Board 10,f County Commissioners. &ge, Teresa Polaski, Deputy Clerk ATTACHMENT "M" Approved Planned Unit Development Insubstantial Change to Ordinance 07-54— Treefarm MPUD HEX NO.2015—42 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION NO. PDI-PL20140000640 — Landquest Group, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance Number 07-54, the Tree Farm MPUD, as amended, to reduce the maximum number of residential dwelling units from 425 dwelling units to 281 multi- family/townhouse or 138 single-family detached units; to reduce the density generated from the Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict from 7.7 to 0 units/acre; to correct a scrivener's error by changing the density generated from the Urban Residential Subdistrict, Density Band from 4 to 7 units/acre; to reduce the size of water management areas from 7.2 to 6.4 acres; to reduce the maximum total allowable square footage within the PUD Commercial Mixed-Use District from 175,000 to 120,000 square feet; to increase the maximum size of retail or office uses from 43,500 to 100,000 square feet; to add a deviation to permit residential components of the PUD to have a maximum wall height of 8 feet along the PUD perimeter and 12 feet along Collier Boulevard; to update various provisions to reflect the conveyance of a 7.42 acre parcel to Collier County; to amend residential development standards relating to minimum setbacks; to create a new Recreational Area section with permitted uses and development standards; to move clubhouse/recreation development standards from the Residential District section to the new Recreational Area section; to remove one transportation development commitment; to reduce the number of required raw water well easements from 2 to 1; to add a utilities development commitment relating to construction and access to the well easement site; and to amend the Master Plan to reflect existing PUD conditions and add a new Recreational Area along the northern PUD boundary, for the PUD property consisting of 58.84± acres located at the Intersection of lmmokalee Road (C.R. 846) and Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) in Section 22, Township 48 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida. DATE OF HEARING: October 22,2015 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Sections 10.02.13 El and 10.02.13 E.2 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition is approved. ANALYSIS: No objections were received and no members of the public attended this hearing. This request provided for a variety of reductions and changes to the previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD). The number of total residential dwelling units were reduced, total maximum commercial square footage was reduced, additional standards were added to the 115-CPS-01428/1210738/11196 I of 3 residential/recreational component, and there was a general clean up of the PUD language to coincide with the overall changes and reflect existing conditions. Changes and clarifications were requested by the Hearing Examiner and.the County Attorney's office at the meeting and are reflected in the attached Exhibit. The recreational area has been depicted on the amended Master Plan, and specific development standards for the recreational area have been added within the existing residential section of the PUD. Deviation#2 was added to allow berms and walls at various locations along the perimeter of the PUD. The applicant agreed to add a traffic maximum peak hour trip generation cap consistent with their updated Traffic Impact Statement (TIS), which is a reduction over their previous trip generation. The applicant agreed to a minimum buffer, including a six-foot masonry wall, between the recreational area and any adjacent residential units. DECISION: The Hearing Examiner hereby approves Petition Number PDI-PL20140000640, filed by Patrick Vanasse, AICP of RWA, Inc. representing Landquest Group, LLC, with respect to the property as described in the Tree Farm MPUD, Ordinance No. 07-54, for the following insubstantial changes: • to reduce the maximum number of residential dwelling units from 425 dwelling units to 281 multi-family/townhouse or 138 single-family detached units; • to reduce the density generated from the Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict from 7.7 to 0 units per acre; • to correct a scrivener's error by changing the density generated from the Urban Residential Subdistrict, Density Band from 4 to 7 units per acre; • to reduce the size of water management areas from 7.2 to 6.4 acres; • to reduce the maximum total allowable square footage within the PUD Commercial Mixed-Use District from 175,000 to 120,000 square feet; • to add a deviation to permit residential components of the PUD to have a maximum wall height of 8 feet along the PUD perimeter and 12 feet along Collier Boulevard; • to update various provisions to reflect the conveyance of a 7.42 acre parcel to Collier County; • to amend residential development standards relating to minimum setbacks; • to depict the Recreational Area on the Master Plan and add development standards specific to that area; • to modify the clubhouse/recreation development standards within the Residential section; • to remove one transportation development commitment; • to add a trip generation maximum value; • to reduce the number of required raw water well easements from 2 to 1; • to add a utilities development commitment relating to construction and access to the well easement site; and • to amend the Master Plan to reflect existing PUD conditions and add a location for the Recreational Area. Said changes are fully described in the Tree Farm MPUD amendment attached as Exhibit HA", and are subject to the condition(s)set forth below. f15-CPS-01428/1210738/1]196 2 of 3 ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A —MPUD Amendment LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Ordinance No. 07-54, the Tree Farm MPUD. CONDITIONS: 1. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. DISCLAIMER: Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners or the Board of Zoning Appeals,as appropriate. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. f (o 2� - ° [S- V j 1., jr C, L Date Ma4 Strain,Hearing Examiner ApprAe ed as to fo and legality: mew Scott A. one Assistant County Attorney [15-CPS-01428/1210738/1]196 3 of3 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 1 of 38 TREE FARM MPUD A MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING THE TREE FARM MPUD, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PREPARED FOR: e • . • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105 LANDOUEST GROUP 5150 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH NAPLES.FLORIDA 34103 PREPARED BY: 1St:. t,SV V_L.SL ENGINEERING 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34109 and • � s •, e . S21 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH.SUITE 201 NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112R. BRUCE ANDERSON CHEFFY PASSIDOMO. P.A. 821 5TH AVENUE SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 1 Text underlined is ydded:Text in deleted. TREE FARM MPUD PL20140000640 luM,19 October 23 2015 I of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No, 2015-42 Page 2 of 38 DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC: DATE REVIEWED BY BCC: ORDINANCE NUMBER: 07-54 AMENDMENTS AND APPEAL: EXHIBIT"A" TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF EXHIBIT AND TABLES STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SECTION III COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE DISTRICT(C) SECTION IV RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(R) SECTION V PRESERVE DISTRICT(P) SECTION VI DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS l p I in'underlined is added.Teit�h is deltIed. TREE FARM MPUD PU0140000040 4n4-2 October 2.3.2015 2 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 3 of 38 LIST OF EXHIBIT AND TABLES EXHIBIT"A" MPUD MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT"B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT"C" SCHEDULE OF DEVIATIONS EXHIBIT"D" COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT TABLE IA FLUE ELIGIBLE DENSITY TABLE IB MPUD DENSITY TABLE 11 PROJECT LAND USE DISTRICTS TABLE III DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TABLE IV DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TABLE V DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RECREATIONAL AREA Text unclaimed,s addedlext stetstb-theettsh is deleted, TREE FARM MPVD 1,12014(}000040 Jaily-20 October 21 2015 3 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 4 of 38 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of±58.84 acres of property in Collier County, Florida, as a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development(MPUD) to be known as the Tree Farm MPUD, shall be in compliance with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP), Land Development Code (LDC) and other applicable codes and ordinances, The commercial and residential uses and recreational facilities of the Tree Farm MPUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives of each of the GMP elements for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is 58.84+/- acres in size and is designated Urban on the Future Land Use Map,with 40.15 acres located within a residential density band of the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, and 18.69 acres located within Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, as identified on FLUM. Consistent with the provisions of Objective 1 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), all uses contemplated are consistent with these respective designations. 2. Approximately 18.69 acres of the subject property is located within an area identified as Activity Center 143 in the FLUE of the GMP for Collier County. 3. Activity Centers are the preferred locations for concentration of commercial and mixed use development activities. The subject property is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of lmmokalee Road and the Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951)— w This strategic location will allow superior access to the site, and provide an ideal location for commercial activities. The project is a mixed use development located within, and less than one mile from, an Activity Center. Therefore, the proposed commercial uses and residential densities are consistent with the FLUE of the Collier County GMP. 4. The development will be compatible and complimentary to existing and planned surrounding land uses(Policy 5.4). 5. The project must comply with the provisions of Division 6.02.01, adequate public facilities requirements of the LDC. Therefore, it will implement, and further Objective 2 of the FLUE, Objective 8 of the Transportation Element, Objective 1.2 of the Sanity Sewer Sub- Element. 6. The maximum allowable density as set forth under the FLUE Density Rating System is as follows: Text udderiined is added.Text totteit-threttett ts deleted, TREE FARM WED PL:0F40009640 4114t49 Wober a 2015 4 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 5 of 38 FLUE Designation Acres Eligible Base Eligible Total Eligible +/- Units/Acre Bonus Eligible Gross Density/Acre Density/Acre Density Mixed Use Activity 18.69 16 N/A 16 299.04 Center Subdistrict Urban Residential 40.15 4 3 7 281.05 Subdistrict, Density Band Total 58.84 N/A N/A 9.85 580.00* Table IA: FLUE Eligible Density (* Rounded) FLUE Designation Acres MPUD Eligible MPUD Gross +1- Density Density/Acre Density Units/Acre Mixed Use Activity 18.69 770.00 16 143.910.00 Center Subdistrict Urban Residential 40.15 4-497.00 7 281.05 Subdistrict, Density Band Total 58.84 77224.78 47839.86 423281.00* I T able 1B: MPUD Density (*Rounded) 7. The MPUD sets forth a maximum density of 425 281 dwelling units (281 multi- family/single family attached/townhouse or 138 single-family detached units) or 7.224.78 dwelling units per acre. •- - • . __•-•__ -_ . - • . • - : -- •: - = *- • - - The Activity Center shall be: developed at a human scale; pedestrian-oriented; and, interconnected with the remaining portions of the project with pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 8. The MPUD has been designed to provide for future vehicular interconnectivity to the west, and has been designed to provide vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle interconnectivity throughout the project, including between the commercial and residential components. Text underlined is Added.Tem is deleted, TREE FARM MPUD PL20140000640 4uPtni9 October 23.2015 5 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 6 of 38 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property,and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of the Tree Farm MPUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING PART OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 1: THE EAST HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXCEPTING AND RESERVING THEREFROM THE EAST 30 FEET AND SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF AS ACCESS EASEMENT FOR HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. PARCEL 2: THE EAST HALF (1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXCEPTING AND RESERVING THEREFROM THE EAST 30 FEET AND THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF AS AN ACCESS EASEMENT FOR HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. PARCEL 3: THE EAST HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-WAY OVER AND ACROSS THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 100 FEET THEREOF FOR CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY. COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 22, S. 00°51'06" E., A DISTANCE OF 1334.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE SAID EAST LINE, S. 00°51'06" E., A DISTANCE OF 1334.40 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER(1/4)CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 22, S. 00°50'18" E., A DISTANCE OF 2569.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF A 100 FEET WIDE CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE LEAVING THE SAID EAST LINE, N. 89°57'31" W., A DISTANCE OF 660.13 FEET ALONG THE SAID NORTH LINE; THENCE LEAVING THE SAID NORTH LINE, N. 00°44'25" W., A DISTANCE OF .--� 2568.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST-WEST QUARTER (1/4) LINE OF SAID Tcxt underlined is added.Text attittirthrotosit is deleted. TREE FARM Mit IF PL20I4UOOO 40 J4,44October 23 2015 6 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 7 of 38 SECTION 22; THENCE LEAVING THE SAID EAST-WEST QUARTER(1/4) LINE N. 00°45'01" W., A DISTANCE OF 1334.03 FEET; THENCE N. 89°56'17" E., A DISTANCE OF 653.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN. CONTAINING 2,563,283.4 SQUARE FEET OR 58.84 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is owned by: Thomas S. Monaghan (Tree Farm Land Trust) (Folio: 00187400000, 00187400002, and 00188040005) Collier County (Folio: 00190041403, 7.42 ac property conveyed fee simple to Collier County—ORG4413 PG 3834 1.4 DEVELOPER The Tree Farm property is intended to be developed by the Tree Farm Land Trust or assignee. All reference to the "developer" as may be contained in this MPUD Document shall mean the Tree Farm Land Trust, unless, and until the subject property described and depicted in this MPUD Document is conveyed, or assigned. It is the responsibility of the Tree Farm Land Trust to notify Collier County, in writing, of the land conveyance, or assignment of the subject property described and depicted in this MPUD Document within six months from the actual conveyance,or assignment. 1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The development property is located in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. It consists of ±58.84 acres located in the northwest corner of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and ollier Boulevard (C.R. 951). The property was previously used as a tree nursery. Improvements on the property consist of a small maintenance shed and the property is generally without topographic relief, with the average elevation at approximately 13 feet above mean sea level. The water management system will consist of approximately ±;726.4 acres of water management areas that will receive runoff from structures and parking areas. Run-off is collected by catch basins and culvert systems for conveyance to the project's internal lake system. The project outfall will be at the project's eastern boundary. Discharge will be into the Cocohatchee Canal that runs along Immokalee Road. Allowable discharge rates will be in accordance with applicable County ordinances. The water management system will be permitted by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) through the Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) process. All rules and regulations of SFWMD will be imposed upon this project including, but not limited to: storm attenuation with a peak discharge rate per Collier County and SFWMD Rules, Text underlined is added:Text rya+is deleted TREE FARM MPUD PL20140000644 fnd44 October 23 2015 7 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 8 of 38 minimum roadway centerline, perimeter berm and finished floor elevations, and water quality pre-treatment. 1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Tree Farm MPUD shall be a mixed-use development. The southern ±18.6$-69 acres of the property, located within Activity Center#3, shall allow for a variety of commercial and res tial-uses. The remainder of the property shall be used for residential development. The commercial land uses within the Activity Center portion of the property are those typically associated with major intersections, including, but not limited to, convenience stores with gas pumps, restaurants, banks, and shopping centers anchored by a major grocery or retail store(s). The commercial uses and signage will be designed to be harmonious with one another and will be compatible with adjacent and nearby land uses. In addition to compliance with all applicable provisions of the LDC, except where deviations are authorized, compatibility and harmony will be achieved by using common architectural elements and common entryway signage and landscape design themes. The amenities proposed to be provided as part of the residential and recreational portion of the project include, but are not limited to structures (clubhouse), and complimentary areas (swimming pool, children's playground, and tennis facilities) to provide social and recreational space, lakes, natural and landscaped open spaces, and a variety of passive (native preserves)and active recreational opportunities. Access to the property will be from the future ef n of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951)and will include an access point off Immokalee Road, when a shared access agreement with the adjacent property to the west is negotiated. The access from Immokalee Road will be aligned with the access to the Pebblebrooke Subdivision located south of Immokalee Road, and across from and to the west of subject property. Access from Collier Boulevard is depicted on the MPUD Master Plan as follows: a right in/right out access at approximately 660 feet from the Collier Boulevard, Immokalee Road intersection; a directional median opening at approximately one-quarter (1/4) mile from Collier Boulevard, Immokalee Road intersection; ai a full median opening at approximately one- half(1/2) mile from the Collier Boulevard, Immokalee Road intersection; and an optional right in/right out access at approximately three quarter (3/4) mile from the Collier Boulevard/Immokalee Road intersection. The directional and full median openings will be aligned with the access points approved for the Heritage Bay DRI, and all access points are subject to review and approval of Collier County Transportation Services Division. Additionally. this project has provided adequate land to accommodate the widening of Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard, including intersection improvements and the reconfiguration of the Immokalee canal to facilitate such improvements. Additionally-the -- - • - - - - - • - The Tree Farm MPUD will be served with centrally provided potable water, sanitary sewer, leas Under lrncd is added.1cxr ...-.L l s t,deleted. I'REE I ARA1 MPUD PL2U l4OOOQG4O kir-24 kir-24October 23.2013 8 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 9 of 38 electric power, and telephone facilities. Additional services will be provided as deemed appropriate. f ext underlined i5 added.1 exi m his deleted TREE FARM MPUt3 PL01400U0b40 40h-24 Owner 23 2011 9 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 10 of 38 1.7 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Tree Farm Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development(MPUD)Ordinance". THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1ext underlined if added:Text is deleted TREF FARM MPUD P120140(0140 4v -?4 October 23.2015 10 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 11 of 38 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land use districts within the Tree Farm MPUD,as well as other project relationships. 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND LAND USE DISTRICTS The project Master Plan, including layout of streets and use of land is graphically illustrated by Exhibit"A", MPUD Master Plan. There shall be three four land use districts, portions of which may include water management lakes or facilities. and private rights-of-way or drive aisles. A breakdown of the Tree Farm MPUD land use districts and their respective acreages is presented in Table I. TABLE II PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS DISTRICT .E ,A GE r "C/M U" COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE ±18.69* RESIDENTIAL ±39.6439.19 RECREATIONAL AREA ±0.45 PRESERVE ±0.51 TOTAL 58.84 * Note: the MPUD provides for a total of 7.42 acres of right-of-way Reser► in conveyance for, : • ';: Collier Boulevard, expansion of Immokalee Road and improvements to the intersection of these two arterial roadways. This right-of-way reser -conveyance includes 4.34 acres within the "C/MU" Commercial Mixed-Use Tract (Activity Center) and 3.08 acres within the "R"Residential Tract 2.3 MAXIMUM PROJECT DENSITY AND INTENSITY A. The Commercial Mixed-Use District will be limited to ±18.69 acres within the designated Activity Center. The Residential District will be limited to ±39.6439.19 acres. B. Intensity: A maximum of-1-737000120,000 square feet of commercial uses may be constructed within the Commercial Mixed-Use District, of which a maximum of 100.00043500 square feet may be retail or office and the balance (above +43,500100.000 square feet) is limited to office use, as set forth in Section 3.3 of this MPUD. Test underlined is added.Text etwele is deleted TREE FARM MPUD PL2Q140000640 Jul+-29October 23.201 11 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 12 of 38 C. Approved Density: A maximum of 425 281 multi-family/single-family attached/townhouse units or 138 single-family detached residential dwelling units may be constructed in the total project area. The gross project area is 58.84± acres. The gross project density, therefore, will be a maximum of 7.221.78 dwelling units per acre. projeet-i rin the The Activity Center shall be developed at a human scale, be pedestrian-oriented, and be interconnected with the remaining portion of the project with pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 2.4 EXISTING STRUCTURES The existing principal structures within the MPUD boundaries may be retained and utilized through the construction and platting phases of the development. 2.5 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS A. A minimum of 0.51 acres (25% of the 2.02 acres of native vegetation on site) is required to be retained or replanted. The Tracts identified as '`P," contain 0.51 +/- acres,and fully satisfyieg the native vegetation requirements. B. This MPUD is subject to a Compliance Agreement entered into and made on June 6, 2005 by and between Collier County and the Tree Farm Land Trust,with respect to vegetation removal on the subject property. This Agreement establishes that 0.51 acres of native preserve shall be provided within the MPUD. A copy of this Compliance Agreement is attached as Exhibit"D". 2.6 RIGHTS-OF-WAY At the discretion of the developer, the minimum right-of-way width to be utilized for all internal project streets may be fifty feet(50'). Deviation #1 from Section 6.06.01(0) of the LDC Utilization of lands within all project rights-of-way for landscaping, decorative entranceways, and signage may be allowed subject to review and administrative approval by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator, or his designee, for engineering and safety considerations prior to installation. 2.7 FENCES AND WALLS Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C. which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts and residential components of a PUD, to allow a maximum wall height of 8' along the perimeter of the PUD, and allow a 12' wall/berm combination within residential portions of the PUD along Collier Boulevard. The berm portion of the 12' wall/berm shall be a minimum of 3' in height. frit underlined is Added.Tcxl soreek.eiemighis Meted TREE FARM MP1.10 PI 20 l40000040 kier49 October 23 2015 12 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 13 of 38 X28 SIGNAGE A. General All signs will be provided in accordance with Chapter 5.06.00 of the LDC except in the following instances. 1. Boundary marker monuments containing project identification signs designed to identify the project, or any major use within the project, shall be permitted in locations depicted on the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit "A"). Said boundary marker monument shall not exceed 6 feet in height as measured from finished grade at the location of the boundary marker monument. The sign face area for such boundary markers shall not exceed 64 square feet in area and shall not exceed the height or length of the monument on which it is located. If the sign is two-sided,each sign shall not exceed 64 square feet in area. Each sign shall only contain the main project name, insignia or motto of the entire development, and the developer's name and logo. Boundary marker monuments shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from any MPUD perimeter property line. DEVIATION#23 2. One off-premises sign may be located to the west of the Tree Farm MPUD generally located near the access to Collier Boulevard from the property immediately adjacent to the west of Tree Farm MPUD. The off-premise sign may deviate from the maximum 12 square foot size set forth in Section 5.06.04.C.15.b.i., but may not exceed 16 square feet in size, and may also deviate from Section 5.06.04.C.15.b.v., which requires such off-site signs to be located within 1000 feet of the intersection of the arterial roadway serving the building, structure or use. DEVIATION#24 3. .. .. . _ - . . - -. Text underlined is added Text attnek-dwoogit is deleted TREE FARM MPLD P1-20140000640 hel.e.40October D.201i 13 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 14 of 38 SECTION III COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE DISTRICT(C/MU) 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development plan for areas designated as District "C/MU", Commercial on Exhibit "A", MPUD Master Plan. The general function and purpose of this District is to provide the opportunity for diverse types of commercial activities that deliver goods and services, including entertainment and recreational attractions,to many segments of the population. 3.2 MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL/OFFICE SQUARE FEET AND MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL DEVLOPMENT The 18.69 t acre commercial area (District "C"), is limited to a maximum of 4-7-57000120.000 square feet of commercial/office uses, of which a maximum of -14 3;-500100,000 square feet may be retail or office and the balance (above 44400100,000 square feet) is limited to office use. :. : - - - : -- - ::- • 3.3 PERMITTED USES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses': 1. Group 0742 — Veterinary services for animal specialties (except outdoor kennel) 2. Establishments furnishing point-to-point communications services as outlined under Major Group 48 in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual; no communication towers are permitted. 3. Group 5231 —Paint glass,and wallpaper stores; 4. Group 5251 —Hardware stores; 'Reference Executive Office of the President,Office of Management and Budget,Standard Industrial Classification Manual,1987 Edition. ttrt tvaieruned u.added.Text 7troeh-sheik is deleted TREE FARM MPl1C1 P1.20140000640 x-29 October 21.2015 14 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 15 of 38 5. Group 5261 —Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores; 6. Major Group 53—General merchandise stores. 7. Major Group 54- Food stores. 8. Group 5531 — Auto and home supply stores, not including any installation facility; 9. Group 5541 —Gasoline stations, not including service facilities; 10. Group 7542—Carwashes only. 11. Industry Group 555—Boat dealers. 12. Major Group 56—Apparel and accessory stores. 13. Major Group 57—Home furniture, furnishings,and equipment stores. 14. Major Group 58—Eating and drinking places. 15. Major Group 59 — Miscellaneous Retail. Industry Group Numbers: 596 — nonstore retailers;598—and not including retail sale of fireworks. 16. Major Groups 60, excluding 6099 check cashing agencies, 61,62, 63, 64, 65, and 67 in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual. 17. Group 7011 — Hotels and motels. The maximum floor area ratio for hotels shall not exceed a factor of 0.60. 18 Establishments operating primarily to provide personal services for the following Industry groups: a. 721 —Laundry,cleaning, and garment services, only including Group 7211 —power laundries, family and commercial, Group 7215 — Coin-operated laundries and dry-cleaning, and Group 7217 — carpet and upholstery cleaning; b. 722—Photographic portrait studios; c. 723—Beauty shops d. 724—Barber shops; e. 725—Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors; f. 729 — Miscellaneous personal services, only including Group 7291 Tax return preparation services, and Group 7299 personal services, not elsewhere classified, only including car title and tag service, computer photography or portraits, costume rental, diet workshops, electrolysis (hair removal), genealogical investigation service, hair weaving or replacements service, dress suit or tuxedo rental, and tanning salons. 1 Text underitned ix added.Text ateueit-OMensir is deleted TREE FARM MPUI) PL2014(1000640 4b0r-20 October 23.2015 15 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 16 of 38 19. Establishments operating primarily to provide business services for the following Industry Groups: a. 731 — Advertising, not including Group 7312 outdoor advertising services agencies; b. 733 — Mailing, reproduction, commercial art and photography, and stenographic services; c. 735 —Group 7352—medical equipment rental and leasing; d. 737 — Computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services, not including Group 7371 — computer programming services. 20. Establishments primarily engaged in developing film and in making photographic prints and enlargements for the trade or for the general public, only including Group 7384, photofinishing laboratories. 21. Group 7513 — Truck rental and leasing, without drivers; Group 7514 — passenger car rental; Group 7515 —passenger car leasing; and Group 7519 — utility trailer and recreational vehicle rental. 22. Group 7631 — Watch, clock, and jewelry repair, and Group 7699 — repair shops and related services, not elsewhere classified. 23. Group 7832 — Motion picture theaters, except drive-in, and Group 7841 — video tape rental. 24. Major Group 79 — Amusement and recreation services, for the following industry numbers: a. Group 7911 —Dance studios,schools and halls b. Group 7922 — Theatrical producers (except motion picture) and Group miscellaneous theatrical services c. Group 7941 —Professional sports clubs and promoters,only including managers of individual professional athletes, and promoters of sports events. d. Group 7991 —Physical fitness facilities e. Group 7999 — Amusement and recreation services, not elsewhere classified, to include moped rental, motorcycle rental, rental of bicycles, schools and camps-sports instructional, scuba and skin diving instruction, sporting goods rental only. 25. Major Group 80—Health services for the following industry groups: a. 801 —Offices and clinics of doctors of medicine; b. 802—Offices and clinics of dentists; c. 803—Offices and clinics of doctors of osteopathy; d. 804—Offices and clinics of other health practitioners. 26. Major Group 807 — Medical and dental laboratories for the following industry numbers: a. Group 8071 —Medical laboratories; b. Group 8072—Dental laboratories. Text underlined is added:iexl Yeses is deleted. TREE FARIMMPUD PL20140000440 irbx19 October 23.2015 16 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 17 of 38 27. Establishments operating primarily to provide legal services as defined under Major Group 81. 28. Group 8231 —Libraries. 29. Membership organizations engaged in promoting the interests of their member as defined under Major Group 86. 30. Establishment operating primarily to provide engineering, accounting, research, and management for the following Industry Numbers: a. Group 8711 — Engineering services b. Group 8712—Architectural services c. Group 8713—Surveying services d. Group 8721 —Accounting,auditing and bookkeeping services e. Group 8732 — Commercial economic, sociological, and educational research f. Group 8741 —Management services g. Group 8742—Management consulting services h. Group 8743—Public relations services i. Group 8748—Business consulting services. 31. Offices of government as defined under Major Group 91 — Executive, legislative,and general government,except finance. 32. Residential multi-family dwelling units, whether in a free standing residential building or located in a mixed commercial and residential building. Mixed use buildings shall adhere to the development standards set forth in Table III below. Residential units shall not be located on the first floor of a mixed use building, and shall be subject to a minimum per unit floor area of 1,000 square feet. Residential buildings with no commercial component shall adhere to the development standards set forth in Table IV. B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage. 2. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the permitted uses within this MPUD Document. 3. One caretaker's residence. 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Table III below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Tree Farm MPUD Commercial District. Standards not specified herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance. JCM underlined is itLldFd:7`em ahn.J.Hitteugh is deleted 'l RI L.J AJ(M\Eli) 11_2014000640 ilirh-44 October 23.2413 17 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 18 of 38 TABLE III DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 sq.ft. N/A AVERAGE LOT WIDTH 100 ft. N/A MINIMUM YARDS(External) From Immokalee Road Canal ROW 25 ft. SPS From Future Extension of Collier Blvd. 25 ft. SPS From Western Project Boundary 25 ft. 15 ft. MINIMUM YARDS Internal Internal Drives/ROW 15 ft. 10 ft. Rear 10 ft. 10 ft. Side 10 ft. 10 ft. Lakes 25 ft. 20 ft.* Preserves 25 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. or 1/2 the sum of 10 ft. MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES building heights** MAXIMUM HEIGHT Retail Buildings(with or without residential uses) 50 ft. 62 ft.*** 35 ft. Office Buildings(with or without residential uses) 65 ft. 77 ft.*** 35 ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 sq.ft.**** N/A MAX.GROSS LEASABLE COMMERCIAL AREA 1.735.800120,000 sq.ft.***** N/A * No structure may be located closer than 20 feet to the top of bank of a lake(allowing for the required minimum 20 foot wide lake maintenance easement). ** Whichever is greater. **** Per principal structure, kiosk vendor, concessions, and temporary or mobile sales structures shall be permitted to have a minimum floor area of twenty-five (25) square feet and shall be subject to the accessory structure standards set forth in the LDC. ***** Total allowable commercial square footage is17-5,000120.000 square feet; however no more than 443.500100,000 may be retail or office and the balance,above X3,508100.000 square feet,if developed, shall be office. SECTION IV 1 underlined 1,added.Text otruek-threugh is deleted. TREE FARM MPUD PL20I40000440 *4 44October 23.2015 18 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 19 of 38 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(R) 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify specific development standards for areas designated as "R" on the MPUD Master Plan, Exhibit"A". Residential uses, infrastructure, perimeter land use buffers, and signage, : : . . -; . . _ will occur within this District. 4.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS The maximum number of residential dwelling units allowed within the MPUD shall be established at the time of development plan review, but shall not exceed 425 281 multi- family/single-family attached/townhouse residential dwelling units or 138 single-family detached units ' - _ . For the purpose of calculating the project density, 4 assisted living facilities (ALF) units shall constitute 1 residential dwelling unit and the maximum number of ALF units shall not exceed 150 units. 4.3 USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single-family attached dwellings (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance); 2. Zero lot line dwellings; 3. Single-family detached dwellings; 4. Duplexes,two-family dwellings; 5. Multiple-family dwellings; 6. ALF with ancillary medical uses and personal services for residents and their guests, including but not limited to, beauty salon, bank, pharmacy and convenience store. (Such ancillary medical or personal service uses shall only be accessed from inside the ALF (no exterior access), , . No external signage or advertising shall be permitted in support of these ancillary medical or personal service uses. Leat underlined i,added-TCM ii..& *hragkh a deleted. TREE FARM MPUD PL24 t411i)t1464( 9 Dauber 23.201 s 19 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 20 of 38 B. Accessory Uses: 1. Customary accessory uses and structures including, but not limited to Buse -private garages, swimming pools , and screened enclosures, - - - . - - . . . -_ . -. ., . • des. 4.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. , . • THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE IV RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS lext underlined rc added. less otrliels-sisreitesis is deleted. 'FRH--FARM MPUO PL30140011Oo40 4u4 Octobct 23.201c 20 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 21 of 38 ,—...... DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE- TWO-FAMILY, SINGLE- FAMILY PATIOL 2 ri G6413440148El FAMILY ATTACHED& ZERO LOT MULTI 4664E.A-T-14364 DETACHED TOWNHOUSE LINE FAMILY 43441L-DINGS' PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 2,250 S.F. 2,250 S.F 2,250 S.F. 10,000 S.F. 404104144- PER UNIT PER UNIT PER UNIT MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 35 FEET 20 FEET 35 FEET 100 FEET 444 MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 S.F. 1.000 S.F 1,000 S.F. 1,000 S.F/D.U. 610,4 MIN FRONT YARD '_ 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET Uto. MIN SIDE YARD 56 FEET 0 FEET or 0 FEET or 4-3-111FEET 644,4 65 FEET 56 FEET MIN REAR YARD 43-2,5_FEET 44-15_FEET 44-11FEET 20 FEET NM MIN PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MIN DIST. BETWEEN STRUCTURES 4-i-ELFEET 4-2-ELFEET 44-11FEET 20 FEET or NA V,ZONED BH, WH ICI HEVER IS GREATER MAX.ZONED HEIGHT 2 STORIES NTE 2 STORIES NTE 2 STORIES NTE 3 STORIES NTE 24-144RTE*S-614+ 42 FEET 42 FEET 42 FEET 50 FEET 50 FEET ACTUAL HEIGHT' 54 FEET 54 FEET 54 FEET 62 FEET 62 FEET „........, ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET NA SIDE 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET NM REAR 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET WA PRESERVE SETBACK' 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 444 MAX.BLDG.11T. SPS SPS SPS 3 STORIES NTE 2-S-TORTES-NT-E NOT TO EXCEED 42 FEET 12 EhET S.P.S.:Same as Principal Structures. NTE:Not To Exceed BH:Building Height ..---..., Tent underlined is added.Text 911V041411196&+is deleted. TREE FARM MPUD PL20140000640 4u1349October 23.2015 21 of 30 I 1 I Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 22 of 38 General Notes: Front yards shall be measured as follows: If the parcel is served by a public or private right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. if the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed)or edge of pavement (if not curbed). Setback from lake easements for all accessory uses and structures may be zero feet(0'). Vo structure, other than those permitted within the LDC to be located within a required landscape buffer tract or easement,shall encroach into a required landscape buffer tract or easement. Footnotes 1) A patio home is a detached or semi-detached single-family unit from ground to roof wherein each dwelling unit lot is enclosed by a wall located at the lot line, thus creating a private yard between the house and the wall. I 2) Setback may be either zero feet (0') on one side and sirt-{6=1 five feet (5) on the other side in order to provide a minimum separation between principal structures of nwelvten feet (#2 J,Q). At the time of application for subdivision plat approval for each tract, a lot layout depicting minimum yard setbacks and building footprint shall be submitted. 3) Front loading garages shall have a minimum front yard setback of twenty-three feet(23'),as measured from the back of sidewalk. Side loaded garages may be located less than twenty-three feel (23')feet from the back of sidewalk provided that the driveway design allows for parking of vehicles so as not to interfere with or block the sidewalk. These provisions apply to a garage whether attached to the principal structure or detached. . 4 t For corner lots, only one (l) front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway shall provide a 10'setback. ext underlined Is added.Text steeelt-thretrsh is deleted, TREE FARM MPUO P1.20140000640 44+-il3October 23.2b15 22 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 23 of 38 4.5 PERMITTED USES FOR RECREATIONAL AREA, LABELED "RA" ON MASTER PLAN A. Principal Uses: I. Clubhouse. gazebo, or other structures intended to provide social and recreational space for the private use of the residents and their guests. 2. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis and basketball courts, playgrounds, pedestrian/bicycle pathways,and water features. 3. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas,gazebos,and park benches. 4. Any other principal use which is comparable in the nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner,as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Community maintenance areas,and maintenance structures. 2. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals 1-13ZA.") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Jci uudctlincil Addcd.Text Dinsek-ithroogli it deleted TREE FARM MPUL) PL2U 1411011060 Atty-24,October 23.2015 23 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 24 of 38 TABLE V RECREATIONAL AREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS RECREATIONAL AREA PRINCIPAL STUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA J 0,000 S.F, MINIMUM LOT WIDTH N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA N/A MIN.FRONT YARD 25' MIN PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET MIN.SIDE YARD 25' MIN.REAR YARD 25' MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN 20' STRUCTURES MAX. ZONED HEIGHT 2 STORIES NT E 50 FEET MAX.ACTUAL HEIGHT 62 FEET ACCESSQ.gY STRUCTURES MIN.FRONT YARD 15' MIN.SIDE YARD 15' MIN.REAR YARD IS' PRESERVE SETBACK MAX, BUILDING HEIGHT 2 STORIES NTE NOT TO EXCEED 42 FEET NTE: Not to exceed Note: Where the Recreational Area abuts residential lots,the required 15' Tyne B buffer shall include a 6' wall. Ti underlined 1,added,lexr airrei-direite is deleted TREE FARM lidPUP PL20 140043064 itilt-2.9 Umber 23 2O 24 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 25 of 38 THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii underlined iiadded,lexiaifueirtiumushadeleted TRU FARM MKT) PL20140000640 1uh-29October 23.201S 25 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 26 of 38 SECTION V PRESERVE AREA(P) 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to set forth the development plan for areas designated as District "P", Preserve Area on Exhibit "A", MPUD Master Plan. The primary function and purpose of this District is to preserve and protect vegetation and naturally functioning habitats, such as wetlands, including upland buffers, in their natural,and/or enhanced state. 5.2 USES PERMITTED A. Principal Uses: 1. Open spaces/nature preserves. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Water management structures. 2. Mitigation areas. 3. Passive recreational uses such as pervious nature trails or boardwalks shall be allowed within the preserve areas, as long as any clearing required to facilitate these uses does not impact the minimum required vegetation. For the purpose of this Section, passive recreational uses are those uses that would allow limited access to the preserve in a manner that will not cause any negative impacts to the preserve, such as pervious pathways, benches and educational signs. Fences may be utilized outside of the preserve to provide protection of the preserve in accordance with the applicable requirements set forth in the LDC. Fences and walls shall not be permitted within the preserve area. Perimeter berms and swales shall be located outside preserve boundaries. C. The .51 acre preserve tract depicted on the MPUD Master Plan shall be re-vegetated in compliance with MPUD Exhibit "D", Compliance Agreement, and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the LDC. ext underlined a added.l cat atrstelt-theoetsh is deleted TR EL FARM MP(.`U PL20140000640 ht1+49(lctobet 23.:015 26 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 27 of 38 SECTION VI DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 6.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of the project. 6.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in accordance with SDP, subdivision plans (if required), and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this MPUD. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the LDC shall apply to this project, even if the land within the MPUD is not to be platted. The developer, its successors and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this Document. The developer, its successors or assignee,shall follow the Master Development Plan and the regulations of the MPUD, as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition,any successors or assignee in title to the developer are bound by any commitments within this Document. These commitments may be assigned or delegated to a condominium/homeowners' association to be created by the developer. Upon assignment or delegation, the developer shall be released from responsibility for the commitments. 6.3 TRANSPORTATION The development of this MPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: such facili . A13. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County rights-of- way or easements, compensating right-of-way shall be provided without cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement. GB. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public right-of-way or easement is determined to be necessary, the fair share cost of such improvement shall be borne by the developer. Teat underlined to added.Te,1 atn.t.dKeugh is deleted. TREE FARM MPUD PL201400Q064Q 1ulp4 October 232012 27 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 28 of 38 DC. The applicant shall reserve rights-of-way for the-€utur�e-Collier Boulevard-exterisien and lmmokalee Road expansion and intersection improvements as depicted on the MPUD Master Plan (Right-of-way Reservations Tracts A, B,and C,totaling 7.42+/- acres). The applicant shall receive impact fee credits in exchange for Right-of-way Reservation Tract B (0.47 acres), but shall not receive impact fee credits for the reservation and eventual dedication of Right-of-way Reservation Tracts A and C. The applicant shall convey by deed, in fee simple, at no cost to the County (other than the aforementioned impact fee credits for Tract B)all lands reserved as depicted on the MPUD Master Plan (as noted herein) within 90 days of written request of the County. 1✓D. The applicant shall construct a twelve foot (12') asphalt greenway within the lmmokalee Road canal right-of-way, or within the adjacent right-of-way reservation area, at the discretion of the Collier County Transportation Services Division. The greenway shall be located on the north side of the canal and shall connect to the greenway that Collier County is constructing to the west of the Tree Farm MPUD property. The developer shall provide five (5) parking spaces for public use in close proximity to and accessible from the greenway. These parking spaces may be located within the Commercial Tract, and may be located within the Right-of-way Reservation Tract "A" on a temporary or permanent basis, with approval from Collier County Transportation Services Division. The greenway shall be constructed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy(CO)within the MPUD. I . The applicant shall design the project stormwater management system so as to accept and treat stormwater from fifty percent (50%) of the impervious area of proposed extension of Collier Boulevard adjacent to the Tree Farm MPUD,in accordance with South Florida Water Management District permitting requirements. GE. The applicant shall be responsible for fair share costs of improvements to the lmmokalee Road/Collier Boulevard intersection, including bridge replacement and/or widening as may be necessary to construct a minimum of two north and two southbound through lanes as well as necessary turn lanes WG. The applicant shall ensure that any easements necessary to facilitate interconnections to properties to the west as shown on the MPUD Master Plan shall be granted by the appropriate instrument(s) at the time of submittal of the first development order application. +H. No certificate of occupancy (CO) for development within the Tree Farm MPUD will be issued until 6 laning of the following roadway segments has been substantially completed(that is fully open to traffic): 1. lmmokalee Road from Collier Boulevard west to 1-75 2. lmmokalee Road from Collier Boulevard East to 43' Avenue N.W.Oil Well Road 3. Collier Boulevard from lmmokalee Road south to Golden Gate Boulevard. lest underlined is added.Text std is deleted. TREE FARM M1'UD PL20140000640 dnlr-29 October 23.1015 28 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 29 of 38 141. Should it become necessary or desirable to construct a wall to mitigate the impacts of noise from Collier Boulevard or lmmokalee Road,the developer-owner successor or assignee shall be responsible for the costs of designing and installing said wall or walls for the portion adjacent to the project boundary. J. The Tree Farm MPUD TIS was based on a development scenario that assumed a variety of commercial uses and a maximum of 281 multi-family units. The total trip generation was estimated in the TIS to be 580 PM peak hour two-way external trips to adjacent streets based on 1TE trip generation rates. The development scenario analyzed in the TIS may change. However, the Project's estimated trip generation will not exceed a maximum of 580 PM peak hour two-way external trips to adjacent streets. 6.4 UTILITIES The development of this MPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. The developer shall reserve two one (1) areas to be granted as an easements to Collier County for a raw water wells. The dimensions of these this well easements : • : ; !! -- ; !! - be at a maximum 80 feet by 50 feet. The approximate location of thisthese well easements is depicted on the MPUD Master Plan. The ftertherly-faW-water well easement site is located at the northeastern corner of the MPUD, and can be accessed from liiiitieltelee-Rea4-6-x4efisietiCollier Boulevard Extension. - - : • ; ;; *; - ; ;- ;. • - • • , • - - "" • - - : , - : ' : - : : - '- - -: • - -•- • - - :, • •-: - - . • •- - • • ; • ; a ; : : : : : ; : ; ; ; The grant of thee-this easements shall occur at the time of site development plan or final plat approval for the area within the development phase that contains the fespeetriioe-well easement sites. At the time of the site development plan and/or final plat submittal, the developer shall provide the well site easement that meets the standard setback requirements for water wells. - ;; : -: - • •- • - : : * - - ; - - ; : •: - : ; ; *- : - - 6.5 ENVIRONMENTAL A. The development shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USF&WS) and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) regarding potential impacts to -listed species". A Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Management Plan shall be submitted to Environmental I cm unticrimedis added.Text litft041-0V4wHeit is Meted MEL 1-A ItAllja113 PL20141)040640 ittly-29 October 23.2015 29 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 30 of 38 Services Staff for review and approval prior to site plan/construction plan approval. Where protected species are observed on site, a Habitat Management Plan for those protected species, or their habitats shall be submitted to Environmental Services Staff for review and approval prior to site plan/construction plan approval. 6.6 AFFORDABLE-WORKFORCE HOUSING: A. The applicant shall provide 15% of the total units built in the project in the affordable housing price range or workforce housing, i.e., for those who earn up to 150% of the median income as calculated annually using the Collier County median income figure for a family of four as determined by the United States Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD). The applicant will use the most current median income figure as defined above at the time of sale to determine if that unit falls into the 150% median income or below. Currently, that would allow a sales price of up to $321,000. The applicant will provide verification of the sales prices to Collier County's Housing and Human Services Department. The form of verification shall be determined between the applicant and the Collier County Housing and Human Services Division. _ . : - THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Tem underlined rs aided:Text mei:telt-49,6,10 is deleted TREF FARM MPI!D PL20140000M0 iu(Y-29 October 23.200 30 of 30 Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 31 of 38 ...—.., i i I , I 4- fisgstn .. 1 , 1 - — - , - a .. * . _. - . k st ggi . I pi g , * 4 : g 2 < IIII 1M I ''''I * .....• 1 a ; I 2 .• T1 ho I - - br— ' I ; ,-; t a, x 2 .....: -1 • ' LI ,i 4 1 _ - a 4=i rx.1 gi ' 41 ,..„-...„ . .1 t 4 ..g. ti1. , iii II N 7 A ik . , 7 it 0 i . 1 4 i mil; 3 ii I I « - 0 fr—it. 3•36„, 8: 1 zb oTi ot (11 z ti,h 11 ;0! ........ ti. › Lin :.s.rim 4 CD 5S*11 F.+ I 16 6%44. R ci) , u 0 1z71 0. s, b• ,,„.3 •ffie ram ,..• • _.....t.-- ). 1 1 m .lira iiicoalli pl ...1',:i Air F...-Rizar- .1t...< g.. ...17, 7, ma 71.ressellir t lisir 4116191111111.In 11 4 ...7i. N -1Z1 V c9 , • i The i ‘440.1 V ivc:1 li i 111Lik ' it 0 1.7 ..... . i m- II .: ,••••••••. 4i 7.7 ;I V' 11 ti .i4,... .:g 1 ,--- — Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 (Note: this page illegible in the originally recorded Ordinance No. 07-54)pa.e 32 of 38 r ! ' .! f ` 1 111 1 YYYY t .'� i ii ::: a. {. Y` t_ it i•Mn IL "j 1 t 1 `t+ tf. y y f, u i " -— Plib ' >,.44 00.011" :., t ♦ 3 - -�.` S t. { s`! C le 4 s .t.., r' 0 \ . A; R �++ 1 ; is .A , i+ if I` • t $,.^ 1 4� t 'is A 1 ''.,......rec..14U4tt CRU(.{hv.I'S*CS(.fY Na..S$.S error "4.44., TREE FARN ~TREE FARM MPUD j/ 11 L.A'�D TRUST Narlet0%at,not../.! At:R1IL PHOTOGRAPH ` i w� i ltrar+enProw Ab+wn. Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 (Note:This page is deleted,and replaced by the two pages that follow) page 33 of 38 biatiliNt AAA it i s k. / .# \ , ---_ i ty 4 i• Y C --� q i ri ,tti ,;t{�flit p1 c t Y i' o s3 I- i+ S:R • Il_ i s I , 11+ 1 I < 1' a .i:. � ="�-_"- f r-=-1 ? 11 s , y s I- .44;,_\\ i. !!! 14 I�J I.. y f I 11 I , ,k k; i 1 , soli r 0--3 44 . 1 i , 1 , , a` > #ilii ih 1 i- ,� I s�Q# ,. —3 3 I i 31 • 1 •�I , MI RRRa�G � V ,.v. K +l I i la 5 r-1 I l(� • #I r t .. 9 jj' ° -...2„.A2,..„,..4lits c-toslita x :titAl .01s, 4furii � 1 e ;. Z -�F w '—i- — I sY ^ e" �t a "=fit lit lYr,: 1 : •.$ ys ., rR '; 1 Atelllfd.i tt ¢Y6{ac s_-off I'. E iHi i I A ■ ;I:::,- l figiAI *- ;; b Mr ? 4¢ tit.Ya 4 �1 i !' I f( R i r t},c 'f RI. iYY c ,i 10 i -.::,-1. la ' i IlI y ''=I i! aFI,� , . It 4 1 I 40 ±,: z 1- 0 --...:, .i, ?, .,,,,, , a I f + ( I ' 1 ; i4 1-' Q X11; ti axlii a 11 MI lig t} �a 4 rla q i pi ; 1 i95, I R f414.1 tile . • �'- --.� . •; 4. ; .: F► L ; 1 it ##.i Aff f s .- ernesena it '" °i •I i'..:l i - ' aTt.i= I It # ! s.€� y I ill p ' tai =1 k ,, 1,lL,! c s r. 1 , c "filet # �5 I s J 11 t I 'a,." , - ', I .. Rr ! + a atc t ER ft g: tVil ei + i # e1_ ; f if i i < ri +.el !I 7 t."� 4= EXHIBIT"A" TRLE FARM LAND TRLST TREE FARM MPUD PI, Ti JL fvt Lits G 6*sfoti MPUD MISTER PLAN Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 f \.,r..r...._- Page 34 • 38 / � 1 ' S , _ 1 \ f+) M �i P --' 4 fOKALEE RQJ____ .� _ -i N ;rig =P'g\ lii' I 'Age\ Z fi L A.nfl \ \ . mgr., ' \• EV ! ... i ip_____-/ 'siz- pii cl r , C 11 C , Icx, 2-00 x 4 . a wr 1"1:1 imoll 7 0 i I- • 1 If ItsNs — z\ Z, ! §4;X 1 '•LI i ii Ai „,,-3I -.4 o Q r2 b I ' ' nx A .- y F to Y �\ 1. x \` ' ' yRc\\ CN \. TTT �� " (,�, C ' pn G o T t VD I I z,c•P I (( ZYox, I \ rl O 90 ) -1V \ � C aI 01 �= 0 5 tZz I ' ',o q .,.. 1 �i i g , x A 1 1.`' P - PLA MIRASOL -}i o M t F- ZONING'PUD•MIRASOL CS RRESIDENTIAL USE RESIDENT .ESPLANADE Y4 5t rript 1 .. LANAOUESTGROUP �' -. ��•. - 1; Fd� -1 r �./1 ��'"�' TIDE FARM MPUD •• �Wu1•.t+.wc�mrlmwwo 141)Si�ip o —:i tMGN1(pMG was 1 MOO[4.41,4404 d•u.wt.o+.i 1IW U WU a ..m,...r.Au.•e......ev.u.s. a ) 1 l # "a EXNNR A MASTER PLAN aww w.....5....$w teal Wta a Ona i .wm...a.ar+�..t.r..n m..... ,+Or o.... _•._t/..aseat.STS • _maw.,rw� ....ow•onc......am w 4444•••• Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 y Ny„ T po y7 mo>�rm �ymo OwcTo�;po m p >p Page 35 • 38 tt A �CGCppCm- O n mA 0.0 C< w.c .. < CTO n „_ I= �1 3 C_' -+OiO D r�zm3* ›,,,.t_zz-y rm O;D> zmm2. m=1: ZzY Fi,mgOE wr-i.,o25TZ�ipmm,..0o xz<_pFr^c„ m�F��r cm. „ I1 4G-T�1QQ mm=mz 2 4m ,tx0m ypz m -4 �Z _A�-K r = 5" 'n"""1" rmmmm Om y6�,,, 5v00,f N zoom=s �T^ m mTr�+^�r�DA m -Z�mnDy �Tm z Y-4 '�.. oz>mzpprl mm - T v T r _,jz 4 p CCz 20-i m +� z _ * �iT Z r r m m x C rTd � r O T_ Z ;� vooi= `�,y�° ry x�m � A0.m==mKm wm3 m7mc O�ZT�Z O 2Tnn s m >�_ mQQQ�JJmm 0A MZA OryI y� m 0 I� dh 2 111111411!! (A �;I � _ 'i p- ya r ��Z>�m-zim pm 25ZT; Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 36 of 38 ! tai=i�i� r ciao s"um=mokorrogro a n 1 rlirr'4 jMy M.MYIM + 44, 1 r ' 'i _., I f 4 _Iw.jj,(i,6�r.. N; tri ti 1 1i �, ,I a 1 .c Il i'; 1 ±si 01 il 4 p . -;,. , 1i\___.' ! <i 12 1 ;Oltt, . 1--.•—__x_7...4-:i. I _ y� 1 , 1,1 ;, !` ,, , �;; TI 41 I"; I-i---:it it__I'I_ILI' 5._:..f_ I I ibi, ,, ,, , _ � M lit' a 7., i;►` 4 I,— _:J + ,_ i y t 1 .a —1 I it j— ' I ' + i _ ."" �. ,.. fil ti . r , • i , , , .tt- : i t-. 3 , ' � ' - I _ { _ 11 Cot ril 1t I. r . Fa a '' ,� 1 ` i r r is ' , Y , II i I ! i a 88 - r-• , . . I fl > r Z - ),.)14 r.. mare TI RY}f 7,,17...4. _ ... 1 TREE TRLS RNA% r.rwnot ' LAND TRl,ST TREE FARM 11�PUD• CONCEPTUAL WATER t 1 1K MA NA GENIE.vTPI,a.r ».. "... '•+••,, Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 37 of 38 „.-..... , , i 1 f - , • r , ,,, w i I•I A ! ii 4 i •!„,...1,,.4 II 4.,w,- k.rl.i.- . • • "" "''''''''' -"-ip4RW4' —..-' ',-, t . ---1.-,-,.._, I s."i'"'"'-'1'74" '1'1- .1 • !I -'.--", t " ' ' * ----- •-•=-="*-..• '";""n !' '-'7 . • . • •••'-0 • . . . .,•..... .,„,.......... .....„—,,,,,,,,,,.., ....,.......„,,, ,_,...,. • - . , 1------- I it'Cill-iiiiircogliiiii*"."''.---- :- ; --. 0; - w -!.,'•; "; IL:-W,4 145" •;' toil , 1" 3 7 .7,i UV r::-7.. i 4'•-: ii...0 '•.^."-:-i3:`":.0:3t-li:. s, 2 0 ,•_MgRad ciirrcprix; -;i1.1.1.ii., - -;:w m 1 1 11 I.< L ' 1 313000401:10t*,:00,-i.,-, wpqaocatmaantill-,. a• .w:,..45i somm . ow. soms• ..... •••••••••••••• •81>. flilign3InarrA k.._k !,?, II'i iiii-ii ; C") 1 .11412:: L i_. .•a.; a, 0....4 1....3 , _.-1. . :.1.3:: , ro ,f ,1 ....., i...-; I, ______ __- ,. li ""i 'I ' •'!No - 377" --.. " I tmr .-tociam••4 -.. :..., . i h 1 i CA tri ..000130C5talt R. 11 ! i -tetiacu za 0! ' , ;! . - mocrIts, , 1 ; : 1 _ — .;":"--,D. - 1 Re lot *.cfnad;b3ciijbaa. . ...‘.' II i 0 • --....., 1 I 1"c;11 I f I 0.0 a If 8 I I tri 1 t7i „t . = , g ›. n tri tri r ..X X qi 1 1 , _____...... I H P1 14. • , : --- . - _ . .„. ) . ... _ . TREE FARM , -.... - .....''''. .. I LAND TRUST CONCEPTUAL WA TER NIA.NAGEMENT PLAN -, I ...Nun Lyon ik Alamos Flores.ihmea%owl TREE FARM MPUD RWs b ii4t,' Exhibit A to HEX No. 2015-42 Page 38 of 38 ._, ;j IS .i. , 1 lia; 1--— - 1 ill . ---.—Ft fP'si., 1 I .., t 3 1 I na . c P.,coi I ic 3 c $.1. .1,, --....,..1 1 . 4.'A Alt e H r,-,7 t .-1 I IT,;..i 1•W I %.21 I I ,....,- c 74 -E' , ,z , >t ..,c . t , , 1 INN I 1 I if14 I i ' cc 11 _ If r-- ---4, 1 1 , I / 1 I11 ,ti ,?' 1 ti Z 4 I i•• S. i . I t ..... I— 1 N... ,. . n TREE rotRM .• . .. LAND TRUST TREE FARM MPUD . . 1- , CR(NS Stt TONS ilLs '. . '0.:. -..1,,,,,,Nisftv*" or.. — —............— ......... DE DAVIDSONN ENGINE SS G EXHIBIT "0" CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com C b NV1d aalsvw vtl.o�;E ",,, d ,, , 00100, SF4P401Yf 11'SEM. wd'.ege" ON 03 oad MI 3x115 1V01d30N00:O 1181HX3 o sroPoH ae.H AS 030.0 'NltlO'MVC11:101=1 bZ -_ 3llN 133'- p ANN -- i i "� 83NItldW00 HSl3M LW O tlN 3-1-1 1oenslvloa3wwoo ame „�, ,alma„T, ,, ,,,,m,� 1dceaa��s 'SNOWWO31119a30NVAG,e1,i.alll.Nd.W�ammovas e1�,K,1 8140191&311 W110 a3fl1Ooi aaHOV3911re23aNvn 103Vad l ¢ ¢ JM 4 I m ¢ o o ¢ W oD oD r O1 Z — /—i%\ ry m o v a G 0 o � rn zcl"c O Q id 14 44 41 +1 y 14 JZ m U N i^ F O=I-'Cw7K ,lO u3�/ H l0 °Ng2O ^ wZ� Fr/ E0-' N �.y 0 _ H ,— 2 W U i f2 J v] Q y N Q LU LU X Z I- LL W 0_ f ... ~hl O 2 W ¢ D a W Wn < W 7 - .,v WWW r Y.mv zow 7 Z Q W Q zw asr MOW TZW rvoe rn 3.eO aaevarw (I) G� W -i,ar in hmiI1F4=-T uglinevern i�f—T—J�i 1 Ng a i, Ej 1 wz LUI ! ai 1 � LLz MO , b il zw --11F e m 1 1- 4* w 3 I J rt� z I 11. ii I } 1 1'1 1 L ' I o 0 _ . i, ! IL IQ !, i WLL 1U t II ; J S Y^ 1 QLU I- W 0 j — __L N w� II >2 aLLIWI/ m C7 J Q ��� 11 Z lUJ CO H� I J F al a ;I 3cc N� 1 Z r 0 2 orcz If . O Q Fz aOW I • §? e > III 11 IIl e I W IQ _ I wW 0 1' ,, W L I 1. Li 1 a., ! II 1!� o yJa 1 1 f ,� '� W(7 N 1 !, , I 1a ,,,_,, — ,____L________, �"T ___, ____. PI a z i.„ (— �tl.d.la.,.,-.. o horn 271,11 rseL TW lLL4N W(')N zW N (1VII.N301S3a — O3dO13A30Nn) i ^ N33a0 dIOM (IVIlN3oIS3a) ands w )133a0 d1OM y a and F rc 5 aJ z (lVI1N3OIS3a) w 4 O )133U0 ATOM O / anal z w..,,-.,oz,z uor PIN.P.,((IMO,ds>)...eta.Awa<..,-o,a-o-c,oz, ad,o o,.....o v..arna,,,,z DE DAVIDSON FNGINf FPING EXHIBIT "P" BOUNDARY SURVEY Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com 11! 51E: tovUll.....-41 N Ii!I;Ii I i ' ' �! g p ,.I ;i@s s tsERg1 ,°I p i yY5t t ei Si I 4yC 1i5 ig 1. E W j f Enmri 9 N ii,g sin Is esaipl� a„, g i 2 s o - eMai' ... �. .....RR 4 i s°P3'Mai°veiQa...,Pr.. �,„ g o : „.,, Fili `a fi i e C j Ns bumm W W, _ C @i d g kln c 1 �9 E 1: c g g t e f sr.•...�wa....µr�u.o. .,. -v-Mr , , a t 4 WI C- T uaa,a.nne a<m'ars ni"'¢a < ��i " i ; M[ i Y tg t'— rP ` --_,. E, kit •--, I 8i1 3 gYI itM it @ b—� Z i e„It I ,---- , ., C R 775 p ill aS��+, d i 4 :I 1 , 1 I • Iti6a ;!g ii I� ii77�IW;Y qq t4I. Iit i E4 iq 2j a y l J E d q*. f. g45pipppg5 y i� 56. a 1 1 1 15 149 $ �ii P ii 4 1$ ! lil ;!!!Mi/1 lq Y q i !i 1 ., H t F • .. .11, ' jA~1 1 3 a e., 1k M! PP ` i 1 "^ -4 —al I c., t AM!pni�M ,. ,, r S M '- =a r '� I Itt.): t 1 li W.i{{ .40 C a is I�� I11 i fr --- . ` ---- fil I s 1 p � tea.-��—s—�-7 -, ylMI eC. 3 \; ifi i ialp I git4�)I e � s� 2 ii I ♦ yy + :i till 1N .,,Iii g �a ill :s N a-�--- t, +! ira 414n ap411 ii - I iia* i '11 .ir ;e, +41 R a ei le �g{) �'s ° ii! ill_. i, I -!i W. t.� 1 i4 Q hit I , a„ R ! 1 P aP1 I „ i . n I. it di,.'"II 7 7°d , t �i, t !_ !— — lymosiWs =� ; 4.414-'-V yy1I6N(aK ]134 n� i —_ [N�d0.a °.1 _++1_— ItI S r M ! —— — f1 to ” 1 PP 5i RR Ks": Boundary Maps on File in the BMR Office for review (to large to scan) DE DAVIDSON EXHIBIT "Q" TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2036 www.davidsonengineering.com ttTrebhl000k plannino•enuineerin0 Traffic Impact Statement Vanderbilt Commons (fka Carolina Village) Planned Unit Development (PUDA) and Growth Management Plan (GMPA) Amendments Collier County, FL 11/01/2016 Prepared for: Prepared by: Davidson Engineering, Inc. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34104 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-434-6060 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee—$ 500.00 Collier County Transportation Review Fee—Small Scale Study— No Fee Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. ��*luIIugii .� J• ��;Q�•�;GEN pSF�CO� No 47116 .1 ' . • *� * •* � : ,STATE OF .:�� et,i/ON Al- Norman O's FLRegistration lNo 4116lcock, P, P.E. This item has been electronically signed and Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA sealed by Norman J.Trebilcock,PE using a SHA-1 authentication code. 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Printed copies of this document are not considered Naples, FL 34110 signed and sealed,and the SHA-1 authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies. Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 1 2 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Table of Contents Project Description 4 Trip Generation 6 Background Traffic 9 Existing and Future Roadway Network 10 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network Link Analysis 11 Site Access and Intersection Turn Lane Analysis 12 Improvement Analysis 15 Mitigation of Impact 15 APPENDICES Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan 16 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) 18 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition 27 Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits 32 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 13 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Project Description The Vanderbilt Commons (fka Carolina Village) development is an approved Mixed Use Planned Use Development (MPUD) located in northwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951), about 1/4 mile west of Collier Boulevard, in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. The project is approximately 15.88 acres in size and it is located in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Refer to Fig. 1 — Project Location Map, which follows and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Fig. 1—Project Location Map 13d �. .. •.. ...i PROJECT c...,...a 0.1,14..C. LOCATION M.. 1 1++1»,46 �.r.at .....o Google.... .;.... ,..._.. ._...,. The approved MPUD currently allows the site (consisting of approximately 15.88 acres) to be developed with up to 150,000sf of commercial uses and up to 64 residential units. The Vanderbilt Commons Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) — Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) proposes to reduce the overall acreage of the PUD to 14.92 acres. The maximum allowed development under proposed zoning application is illustrated in Table 1A. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 14 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Table 1A Maximum Allowed Development Program Development Land Use ITE Land Use* ITE LUC Total Size Commercial Office Park 750 60,000sf Commercial Shopping Center 820 90,000sf Residential Residential Condominium/Townhouse 230 64 dwelling units Note(s): *ITE land uses illustrated in agreement with approved Major Traffic Study for Carolina Village PUD,dated 08-07-2004. Under the proposed rezone petition, the Vanderbilt Commons PUDA — GMPA project will continue to be developed as a mixed-use project by proposing a potential development scenario as shown in Table 1B. Table 1B Proposed Development Program—Scenario 1 Development Land Use ITE Land Use ITE LUC Total Size Self-Storage Mini-Warehouse 151 95,550sf General Office General Office Building 710 10,000sf Medical Office Medical-Dental Office 720 10,000sf Pre-Kindergarten (Pre-K) Day Care Center* 565 160 students Retail Shopping Center 820 71,650sf Residential Residential Condominium/Townhouse 230 58 dwelling units Note(s): *per ITE description,"a day care center is a facility where care for pre-school age-children is provided". For the purposes of this evaluation, the project build-out year is assumed to be consistent with the Collier County 2021 planning horizon. A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on October 26, 2015, via email, as illustrated in Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist. Please note that although the proposed land use scenarios have changed from the initial methodology application, the existing approved methodology concepts are still applicable and are reflected in this report. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page l 5 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Connections to the site are currently provided via one full movement access on Pristine Drive and one full movement access on Buckstone Drive. No new connections are proposed as part of this application. Trip Generation The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. The project's site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition and the software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, most current version). The ITE rates and equations are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition. The residential associated common recreation amenities are considered passive incidental to residential use, and are not included in the trip generation analysis. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. Per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the internal capture trips should be reasonable and should not exceed 20% of the total project trips. Based on the multi-use nature of this development and in agreement with Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures and coordination with Collier County Transportation staff, a 10% internal capture rate is assumed for the overall project traffic. The pass-by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. It should be noted that the driveway volumes are not reduced as a result of the pass-by reduction, only the traffic added to the surrounding streets and intersections. As such, pass-by trips are not deducted for operational-access analysis (all external traffic is accounted for). Consistent with Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, shopping center pass-by rates should not exceed 25% for the peak hour and the daily capture rates are assumed 10% lower than the peak hour capture rate. This analysis calculates Shopping Center LUC 820 pass-by daily rates at 15% and AM and PM peak hour rates at 25%. The new proposed PUDA — GMPA project trip generation is illustrated in Table 2A — 1 (and detailed in Table 2A—2). Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 1 6 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Table 2A- 1 Trip Generation—Proposed GMPA Conditions—Average Weekday* Development PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Proposed GMPA 338 389 727 Total Internal 33 39 72 Total External 305 350 655 Total Pass-By 52 56 108 Total Non-Pass-By 253 294 547 Note(s): *Trip generation details—refer to Appendix C. Table 2A-2 Trip Generation—Proposed GMPA Conditions—Average Weekday—PM Peak Hour Trips* Development ITE Land Use Unadjusted Internal Total Pass-By Total Non- Land Use Code Size Entry-Exit Capture External Capture Pass-By Entry-Exit Entry-Exit Entry-Exit Entry-Exit Self-Storage LUC 151 13- 12 1- 1 12- 11 0-0 12-11 95,550sf General LUC 710 Office 10,000sf 6-28 1-3 5-25 0-0 5-25 Medical- LUC 720 Dental Office 10,000sf 10 27 1 3 9 24 0-0 9-24 Day Care LUC 565 54-60 5-6 49-54 0-0 49-54 Center 160 students Shopping LUC 820 230-249 23-_25 207-224 52-56 155- 168 Center 71,650sf Residential LUC 230 25- 13 2- 1 23- 12 0-0 23-12 58 du Total 338-389 33-39 305-350 52-56 253 294 Note(s): *Trip generation details—refer to Appendix C. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 17 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 The trip generation analysis based on currently approved zoning conditions is shown in Table 2B—1 (and detailed in Table 2B—2). Table 2B—1 Trip Generation—Approved MPUD Conditions—Average Weekday* PM Peak Hour Development Enter Exit Total Approved MPUD 320 449 769 Total Internal 32 44 76 Total External 288 405 693 Total Pass-By 60 66 126 Total Non-Pass-By 228 339 567 Note(s): *Trip generation details—refer to Appendix C. Table 2B- 2 Trip Generation—Approved MPUD Conditions—Average Weekday—PM Peak Hour Trips* Development ITE Land Use Unadjusted Internal Total Pass-By Total Non- Land Use Code Size Entry-Exit Capture External Capture Pass-By Entry-Exit Entry-Exit Entry-Exit Entry- Exit Residential L64 duo 28- 14 3- 1 25- 13 0-0 25- 13 Shopping LUC 820 Center 90,000sf i 268 290 27 29 241 261 60 66 181—195 Office Park LUC750 24- 145 2- 14 22- 131 0-0 22-131 60,000sf Total 320-449 32-44 288-405 60-66 228—339 Note(s): *Trip generation details—refer to Appendix C. The projected net new trip generation is illustrated in Table 2C which shows total proposed conditions versus existing approved (the difference between Table 2A—1 and Table 2B—1). In agreement with the Collier County TIS guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for adjacent roadway network is PM. For the purpose of this TIS, the potential project's traffic impact is analyzed based on projected PM peak hour non-pass-by trips generated as a result of the proposed PUDA-GMPA (as shown in Table 2C). Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 18 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Pass-by trips are not deducted for traffic operational analysis. As such, the total external generated traffic (PM Peak Hour 305 — 350 illustrated in Table 2A— 2) is computed for the site access turn lane analysis. The projected net new trip generation for project is illustrated in Table 2C. Table 2C Trip Generation (Projected Net New Traffic)—Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Development Enter Exit Total Proposed GMPA* 253 294 547 Total Non-Pass-By Trips Approved MPUD** 228 339 567 Total Non-Pass-By Trips Proposed Net New Traffic Total Non-Pass-By Trips 25 (45) (20) Net Increase/(Net Decrease) Note(s): *Refer to Table 2A—1. **Refer to Table 2B—1. As illustrated in Table 2C, from a traffic stand point, the proposed rezone development scenario is less intensive when compared to the maximum allowed under current zoning conditions. Background Traffic Future projected background traffic volumes are calculated based on approved growth rates and trip bank volumes for the segments of the roadway network in the study area, as shown in Collier County 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). The higher of the two determinations, is to be used in the Roadway Link Level of Service analysis. Based on Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance, a minimum of 2% growth rate is considered. Table 3, on the next page, illustrates the projected background peak hour peak direction traffic volume (without project)for the future build-out year 2021. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Nage 1 9 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Table 3 Background Traffic without Project (2015-2021) 2015 AUIR Projected 2021 Projected 2021 Projected CC Pk Hr,Pk Dir Traffic Pk Hr,Peak Dir Pk Hr,Peak Dir Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Background Trip Background Traffic Volume Traffic Volume Link Link Location Traffic Growth Factor Bank w/out Project w/out Project ID# Volume Rate (trips/hr) (%/yr)* (trips/hr) (trips/hr) Growth Factor** Trip Bank*** Vanderbilt Beach Rd 112.0 West of Collier Blvd 1,250 4.0% 1.2653 1,582 189 1,439 (CR 862) Collier Blvd. 30.1 North of Vanderbilt 1,480 4.0% 1.2653 1,873 461 1,941 (CR 951) Beach Rd Collier Blvd. South of Vanderbilt (CR 951) 30.2 1,120 2.0% 1.1262 1,262 166 1,286 Beach Rd Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate—estimated for 2009-2014 peak hour,peak direction traffic volumes,or 2%minimum. **Growth Factor= (1+Annual Growth Rate)^6.2021 Projected Volume=2015 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. ***2021 Projected Volume=2015 AUIR Volume+Trip Bank.The projected 2021 Peak Hour—Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation,which is underlined and bold as applicable. Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). Future projected roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5- Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements are identified in the Collier County 2015 AUIR, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build-out. The existing and projected future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 4, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 110 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Table 4 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Min. Exist Peak Dir, Future Roadway Link CC AUIR Roadway Link Exist Standard Peak Hr Project Link ID# Location Roadway LOS Capacity Build out Volume Roadway Vanderbilt Beach 112.0 West of Collier Blvd. 6D E 3,000(EB) 6D Rd(CR 862) Collier Blvd. 30.1 North of Vanderbilt 6D E 3,000(NB) 6D (CR 951) Beach Road Collier Blvd. 30 2 South of Vanderbilt 6D E 3,000(SB) 6D (CR 951) Beach Road Note(s): 2U=2-lane undivided roadway;4D,6D,8D=4-lane,6-lane,8-lane divided roadway,respectively;LOS=Level of Service. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which were evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future. The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links, and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Based on these criteria, this project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. None of the analyzed links are projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard with or without the project at year 2021 future conditions. Table 5, Roadway Link Level of Service, illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the studied roadway network. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 111 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Table 5 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS)—With Project in the Year 2021 2015 Peak Roadway 2021 Peak %Vol. Min LOS Min LOS Link,Peak CC AUIR Dir,Peak Dir,Peak Capacity exceeded exceeded Roadway Roadway Link Dir,Peak Hr Link Link ID Location Hr (Project Hr Volume Impact without with # Capacity w/Project By Project? Project? Volume Volume ** Project Yes No Yes No Added)* Yes/No Vanderbilt Beach Rd 112.0 West of Collier Blvd. 3,000(EB) N/A 1,582 0.0% No No (CR 862) Collier Blvd. 30.1 North of Vanderbilt 3,000(NB) N/A 1,941 0.0% No No (CR 951) Beach Road Collier Blvd. South of Vanderbilt 30.2 3,000(SB) N/A 1,286 0.0% No No (CR 951) Beach Road Note(s): *Not applicable as proposed project has negative net new traffic. **2021 Projected Volume=2021 background(refer to Table 3)+Project Volume Added. Site Access and Intersection Turn Lane Analysis No changes to the approved project accesses and no new connections are proposed with this GMPA application. The project accesses are evaluated for turn lane warrants based on the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook: (a) two-lane roadways — 40vph for right-turn lane/20vph for left-turn lane; (b) multi-lane divided roadways — right turn lanes shall always be provided; when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left-turn lanes. Turn lane lengths required at build-out conditions are analyzed based on the number of turning vehicles in an average one-minute period for right-turning movements, and two-minute period for left-turning movements, within the peak hour traffic. The minimum queue length is 25 feet and the queue/vehicle is 25 feet. For more details refer to Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits. Pristine Drive—Western Access Pristine Drive is a two-lane undivided local roadway and has a posted legal speed limit of 30 mph in the vicinity of the project. A southbound left-turn lane is not warranted as the project does not meet the traffic volume criterion. The existing northbound right-turn lane is approximately 195 feet long. At the minimum, the right-turn lane should be 195 feet long (145 feet deceleration lane with taper and 50 feet of storage), as the project is expected to generate 76vph inbound right-turning movements during Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 112 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 the PM peak hour. As such, the existing turn lane is adequate to accommodate proposed traffic. Eastern Access—Buckstone Drive Buckstone Drive is a two-lane undivided local roadway and has a posted legal speed limit of 30 mph in the vicinity of the project. The existing southbound right-turn lane is approximately 210 feet long. A right-turn lane is warranted as the project meets the traffic volume criteria. The project is expected to generate 61vph inbound right-turning movements during the PM peak hour. At the minimum, the southbound right-turn lane should be 170 feet long (145 feet deceleration lane with taper and 25 feet of storage). As such, the existing turn lane is adequate to accommodate proposed traffic at build-out conditions. The existing northbound left-turn lane is approximately 250 feet long. A dedicated left-turn lane is warranted as the project meets the traffic volume criteria. The project is expected to generate 153vph inbound left-turning movements during the PM peak hour. At the minimum, the northbound left-turn lane should provide 150 feet of storage. Due to low speeds expected on this segment, the existing turn lane is considered adequate as it accommodates traffic storage at build-out conditions. Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862)—Existing Conditions Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862) is under Collier County Department of Transportation jurisdiction. This roadway is an east-west six-lane divided arterial roadway to the south of the subject parcel. This roadway has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of project. Based on FDOT Construction Standards Index #301, the minimum turn lane length is 185 feet (which includes a 50 feet taper) plus required queue. CR 862 & Pristine Drive Intersection — Right-in/Right-out Connection: A right-turn lane on CR 862 is warranted as the project meets the multi-lane criteria. The project is expected to generate 76vph inbound right-turning movements during the PM peak hour. At the minimum, the westbound right-turn lane should be 235 feet long (185 feet deceleration lane with taper and 50 feet of storage). CR 862 & Buckstone Drive Intersection — Full median Opening Connection: The existing westbound right-turn lane is approximately 350 feet long. The project is expected to generate 122vph inbound right-turning movements during the PM peak hour. At the minimum, the westbound right-turn lane should be 260 feet long (185 feet deceleration lane with taper and 75 feet of storage). As such, the existing turn lane is adequate to accommodate proposed traffic at build-out conditions. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 113 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 The existing eastbound U/left-turn lane is approximately 400 feet long. The project is expected to generate 92vph inbound U/left-turning movements during the PM peak hour. At the minimum, the eastbound left-turn lane should be 285 feet long (185 feet deceleration lane with taper and 100 feet of storage). As such, the existing turn lane is adequate to accommodate proposed traffic at build-out conditions. Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862)—Potential Future Conditions To enhance safety operations on Vanderbilt Beach Road, a potential future modification on CR 862 is analyzed as follows: a full median opening on CR 862 at Pristine Drive intersection, and replacement of the existing full median opening with a directional opening for left-turns from two directions at Buckstone Drive intersection. CR 862 & Pristine Drive Intersection — Full median Opening Connection: A right-turn lane on CR 862 is warranted as the project meets the multi-lane criteria. The project is expected to generate 61vph inbound right-turning movements during the PM peak hour. At the minimum, the westbound right-turn lane should be 235 feet long (185 feet deceleration lane with taper and 50 feet of storage). A left-turn lane on CR 862 is warranted as the project meets the multi-lane criteria. The project is expected to generate 61vph inbound left-turning movements during the PM peak hour. At the minimum, the eastbound left-turn lane should be 260 feet long (185 feet deceleration lane with taper and 75 feet of storage). A U/left-turn lane on westbound CR 862 is warranted as the project meets the multi-lane criteria. This turn lane would provide for safe U-turns for potential background trips wanting to go eastbound on CR 862. At the minimum, the eastbound left-turn lane should be 285 feet long (185 feet deceleration lane with taper and 100 feet of storage). CR 862 & Buckstone Drive Intersection — Right in/Right-out/Left-in Connection: The existing westbound right-turn lane is approximately 350 feet long. The project is expected to generate 76vph inbound right-turning movements during the PM peak hour, under this scenario. At the minimum, the westbound right-turn lane should be 235 feet long (185 feet deceleration lane with taper and 50 feet of storage). As such, the existing turn lane is adequate to accommodate proposed traffic at build-out conditions. The existing eastbound left-turn lane is approximately 400 feet long. The project is expected to generate 31vph inbound left-turning movements during the PM peak hour. At the minimum, the eastbound left-turn lane should be 235 feet long (185 feet deceleration lane with taper and 50 feet of storage). As such, the existing turn lane is adequate to accommodate proposed traffic at build-out conditions. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 114 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 A more detailed evaluation of applicable access points and intersection connections for various scenarios will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available, to determine turn lane requirements and signalization, as they are warranted, as applicable. Improvement Analysis Based on the results of the trip generation analysis, the proposed development shall be limited to 727 unadjusted two-way PM peak hour trips, allowing for unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. It is our recommendation that for the purposes of calculation of the weekday PM peak hour trips for this project, the most current ITE Trip Generation Manual be utilized. The proposed project traffic generation is less intensive compared to the Approved MPUD Development Program resulting in negative net new traffic. The proposed project is not a significant and adverse traffic generator for the roadway network traffic at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate proposed development generated trips without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Based on the turn lane analysis performed as part of this report, turn lanes improvements are �. recommended at the Vanderbilt Beach Road analyzed intersections. A more detailed evaluation of applicable access points and intersection connections and nearby intersections will be performed at the time of Site Development Plan (SDP)/Construction Plans and Plat (PPL) submittals, as applicable. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 115 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan (1 Sheet) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 116 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 111 igl m awV uer pose w Iar NW rar ION VO Sr I 0.11•00.71 y .,r,.no.. x , I s.M ..�.sMo. 1 /'— it 1 i I -s I i ii ) i 11iii 1 I 1 0 IL i —11[ 1 !' ` I� I-r7Ll 1 01 , . I 9 1( I - �_'I W II i �� I 0 t , 3 g roO R ) .., lir ii, ii il R ii id , . I, �I I I I II I i 1 1I lR1 , ( l ' o I r l J i i li ' _.___A -1 —T� —' ,. �ww.1n w�n.nawu x ` i xwnaw . rT Il liN3OM3tl) P/H043O4931 33313 flOM MHO d1OM Mai NUtl Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 117 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) (8 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 118 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 pow\ INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply,or N/A(not applicable). Date: October 26.2015 Time: N/A Location:N/A—Via Email People Attending: Name,Organization,and Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sawyer.Collier County Growth Mgmt.Division 2) Norman Trebilcock,TCS 3) Ciprian Malaescu,TCS Study Preuarer: Preparer's Name and Title:Norman Trebilcock.MCP.PE Organization:Trebilcock Consulting Solutions.PA Address &Telephone Number: 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202,Naples, Fl 34110;ph 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name&Title:Michael Sawyer.Project Manager .0"""N. Organization:Collier County Transportation Planning Department Address & Telephone Number: 2885 S. Horseshoe Drive,Naples, FL,34104; ph. 239- 252-2926 Applicant: Applicant's Name:Davidson Engineering,Inc. Address:4365 Radio Road.Suite#201,Naples FL 34104 Telephone Number:239-434-6060 Proposed Development: Name: Vanderbilt Commons PUD aka Carolina Village PUD)—Growth Management Plan Amendment(GMPAI Location:northwest quadrant of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road(CR 862)and Collier Boulevard(CR 951)- refer to Fig1_ ITE Land Use Type:Existing/Proposed—refer to Attachment 1 ITE Code#: Existing/Proposed—refer to Attachment 1 Description: Pursuant to adopted Collier County Ordinance No. 2005-19, the subject parcel is allowed for development of up to 150,000sf of commercial development and up to 64 residential dwelling units located on the second and/ or third floor of mixed use buildings that have commercial uses on at least the first floor. Page 1 of 8 __ —4 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 119 Vanderbilt Commons-PUDA and GMPA-TIS-November 2016 Vanderbilt Commons GMPA proposes 20,000sf Shopping Center(to include 4,000sf Sit Down Restaurant and 16,000sf Retail and/or Office). 6,000sf Convenience Store with Fuel Pumps, 4,500sf Fast Food Restaurant, 13,000sf Office(to include 2,600sf Medical Office and 10,400sf General Office 1, 10,000sf Daycare and 95,000sf of Self-Storage. Fig.1-Project Location Map gym:» if i . I a / at it , • a • Zoning;Approved Carolina Village PUD-per Collier County Ordinance No.2005-19 Comprehensive plan recommendation:N/A Requested:To allow proposed commercial development. Findings of the Preliminary Study: Since estimated net new project traffic is less than 100 peak hour trips, this study qualifies for a Minor Scale TIS - no significant operational impacts with minimal roadway impacts and work within the county right-of-way. The TIS will include PM peak hour trip generation. traffic distribution and assignments, significance test,roadway link analysis and site access points turn lane analysis. Existing allowed ITE land uses are consistent with the approved Major Impact Study for Carolina Village PUD.dated August 7,2004. Internal Capture-estimate conservative 10%assumed for project. Pass-By Rates -consistent with ITE Guidelines and capped in agreement with Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures - 25% Shopping Center; 50% Fast-Food Restaurant and 50%for Convenience Market with Gasoline Pumps. Roadway concurrency analysis-based on Total Non-Pass-By PM Pk Hr trip generation 2°k12%/3%criterion. Operational Site Access Analysis-based on Total External PM Pk Hr trip generation. No changes to the existing access improvements onto Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collie Blvd.are requested. Page 2 of 8 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 20 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Transportation requirements per Ordinance No. 2005-19 will be address in the GMPA application by others. Study Type: (if not net increase,operational study) Small Scale TIS 0 Minor ns Major TIS 0 Study Area: Adjacent roadways:west—Pristine Drive,east—Buckstone Drive Additional intersections to be analyzed:N/A Horizon Year(s):2Q21 Analysis Time Period(s):PM Pk Hr Future Off-Site Developments:WA Source of Trip Generation Rates:ITE 9n'Edition Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: None:N/A Pass-by trips:per ITE and Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures Internal trips(PUD): 10%max estimate Transit use:N/A Other:N/A Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements:2021 Methodology&Assumptions: ___ Non-site traffic estimates:Collier County traffic counts and 2015 AUIR Site-trip generation:OTTIS Software—ITE 9"Edition Trip distribution method:engineer's estimate,refer to Fig.2 Traffic assignment method:project trip generation with background growth Traffic growth rate:historical growth rate or 2%minimum Turning movements:Engineer's estimate—refer to Fig.3. Page 3 of 8 P.—\ Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 121 Vanderbilt Commons-PUDA and GMPA-TIS-November 2016 Fig.2-Project Trip Distribution by Percentage gillPROJECT TRIP • DISTRIBUTION MAP 47; r BY PERCENTAGE s r ._ OEM 300% Go ale Fig.3-Project Turning Movements Map by Percentage 151334-]1E:3 le 97)." PROJECT TURNING 1.2 M_ MOVENENTBBY 50% •••••• 200% PERCENTAGE _ ;{5%) #(10%) r al ■ �, } (10%) is tNeouNU ! (20%) i654o�l • 500% ." .i�4al %I = 0%t�p, 0096 "� 10. t---� 25 0% 1(10%) 5%) (21:%)a E— r13.M1 10.0% (10%) (20%)" Go.:gle Page 4 of 8 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 122 Vanderbilt Commons–PUDA and GMPA–TIS–November 2016 Special Features:(from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations:N/A Sight distance: /A/A Queuing: Access location&configuration:N/A Traffic control:,MUTCD Signal system location&progression needs:N/A On-site parking needs:Per CC LDC Data Sources:ITE Trip Generation 9th Edition Base maps:ELA Prior study reports:N/A Access policy and jurisdiction: /A Review process: /A Requirements:N/A Miscellaneous: N/A Small Scale Study–No Fee Minor Study-$750.00 x +Methodology-$500.00=$1,250.00 Major Study-$1500.00 Includes 2 intersections Additional Inteinections-$500,00 each All fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to T raarpo,Wtion prior to our sign-off on the application. SIGNATURES Norman.-retbil000k Study Preparer—Norman Trebilcock Reviewer(s) Applicant Page 5 of 8 >�1 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 123 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. }Methodology Review-$500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement,including review of' submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval'comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re-submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County,if needed. "Small Scale Study"Review-No Additional Fee(Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation,distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Study Review"-$750 Fee(Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes:optional field visit to site,confirmation of trip generation,distribution,and assignment,concurrency determination,confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of off-site improvements within the right-of-way,review of site access and circulation,and preparation and review of"sufficiency"comments/questions. "Maior Study Review"-$1,500 Fee(Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency reviews Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination,confirmation of committed improvements,review of traffic volume data collected/assembled,review of traffic growth analysis,review of off-site roadway operations and capacity analysis,review of site access and circulation,neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates,and preparation and review of up to two rounds of"sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review"-$500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the"Major Study Review"and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the"Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews"-$500 Fee) Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 6 of 8 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 124 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 ATTACHMENT—1 Protect Nam: Vanealer cbmm0na-EAalkg Approved No: Dau: 10234016 Cay. itM.TrovNlct: Zip/Postal Cod*: Country Mort Name: Analyst's Nam: NM= 11F.T 41MEofon Land Use SQ. 1 f1ll Pk Nr Entry Oso 21$.Rssis dCendoniniumiTwrauU 64'" 28 14 Rrdudon 3 1 11teas o 0 Ptss-by o 0 } Non-pass-0y 26 13 $70.flopping Cantor feet 201 221 Rtadlon 20. 22 Irbnla o 0 Pass-0y 4* 50 Non-pass-by 131 149 750.001ca Park •"t 20 177 Redudion 3 18 Nbrna 0 0 pass-by 0 0 Non•pacs-0y 20 159 Taft II 211 412 Total Raducnon 21 41 Total Natuna 0 0 Total Pass-by ao s0 Teti Non.Pssay III 321 (r)D.stlay this (7) /noes;Fist Gro;.s tens**Ana 10 1nOO5 Pail Goon PiorArai Page 7 of 8 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 125 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 C 064064 6451414. Vsnan4n Cowman.-P+P4P4e0 IIK D .. 10'232015 dy: C.anry: C0014$61410:. 11n46205s N. . 1641040: 0E-7646 OM WK. NNW 6k. ` 151-1641l5e41444.04 ON TB 12 ii.0umm 1 Mem41 0 0 Pasaby 0 0 00*04e6.0,• 12 f 1 NO-041 Cr.Connor N. N BS Pef•.C4a, B 6 hennas 0 0 P.sa y 0 0 N.nOxst» 63 00 , 760-14.710410 W.Bwlano 10471' 16 75 51e4.4060 1 7 0007141 0 0 Pas.Oy 0 0 400N1 7 01 00 730-41004414)60x.1 Mc.Bui4600 20* B B ReduDm 0 1 Mema1 0 B Pest-4y 0 0 N5+0446.0,• 3 7 NO-Os..0np CooNr 200' N 1000 Rea+cto0 00 11 10.0141 0 0 104456y 22 N 14406144600y 00 11 N4-Bu60asdMnor4swith Drwir.The..yh Winder 45. 10 71 Flay*. 0 7 hennas 0 0 "...-.Ns, P.c.Oy 34 22 i 615c.044ssb2 3a 32 1/32-1304,064006546504560011.4361441104 P..ys B!4 152 163 1006101004 15 10 40801 0 0 504aNy 00 00 7/00-0450.06 N N 1 T.41 410 400 1.: 1.45141451e040 11 40 Total 4d.my 0 0 T.no104444.2 126 126 Tosellftwimall 360 BIB 00/0001 p4400400100.440.4 127 NO11 r.80.0 NNloo Page 8 of 8 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 126 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition (4 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 127 Vanderbilt Commons-PUDA and GMPA-TIS-November 2016 - Cr 4 w a` w c f JgW ill w a a E g S V � 777 x I; iu sE S aiLEra z � ao LmaazLma Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 128 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 PERIOD SETTING ,, DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis.To record any notes,click + Add Notes above. PROJECT NAME. VANDERBLT COMMONS MAmMUM ALLOVJEC ANALYSIS NAME (pm pyo LAND USE INDEPENDENT SIZE TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARIABLE CmdonMrNrmJTowtklouse DwellingUnits64 Weekday,p46614441—vii Beat F8(LOG) la V26 14 42 Ott---7111 Ln(T)=0.82Ln(X)+00.32 0 820-Shopping Center 11000 Sq.Feet GroS ) 90 1 Weekly,Peak Ho�4 ��Fa(LOG) L�„ 268 290 558 art_ 11 1l Ln(T)60.67Ln(X)+3.31 04 750-OOke Perk i'000 Sq.Feet Oros 60 Weekday,P.M.Pea v Bost Fit(LIN) 8v ® 24 145 169 t T=1.22(X)+95.83 f The Nme periods do not match. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Specify a percentage by which the Entry Trip and Exit Trip will be reduced for each Land Use.This reduction is applied to the Entry Trip and Exit Trip from the previous section.To record any notes,click • Add Notes above. LAND USE ENTRY REDUCTION ADJUSTED ENTRY EXIT REDUCTION ADJUSTED EXIT 230-Residential Condomlnkan/Townhouse (10 3% 25 (10 )16 13 820-Slopping Center (10 )96 241 10 261 750-OIBce Perk (10 )% 22 CID* 131 INTERNAL TRIPS EXTERNAL TRIPS Specify the percentage of Pass-by Trips for each Land Use.The percentage will be reduced from the total number of External Trips from the previous section.To record any notes,click • Add Notes above. The til icon preceding the Pass-by%value indicates data provided by ITE.Clicking the icon changes a custom Pass- by%value to data provided by ITE LAND USE EXTERNAL TRIPS PASS-BY% PASS-BY TRIPS NON-PASS-BY TRIPS 230-Residential Condomkrkan/Townhouse 38 (0 ]% 0 38 820-Shopping Center 502 0125 1% 126 376 750-011ke Park 153 l" 0 153 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 129 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 ,---\ Project Name: Vanderkak Commons-Scenario 1 No: Data: 10/2512016 City: State/Province: ZlpiPostal Code: County: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: ITE-TGM 94ITEdltion PM PEAJ{MGtlP L6.71.0 USE SIZE Entry Exit 161-Minl1Mrahouss 955570 13 12 Reduttlan 1 1 EInternal a 0 Pass-by 0 0 Non-pass-by 12 11 110-General Office Building 10 in 8 28 Reductia7 1 3 Internal 00 Pass-by Cl 0 Non-pass-by 5 25 120-Medica-Dental Office Building '14r'/ 10 27 Reductio 1 3 Internal 0 0 Pass-by 0 0 Non-pass-by 9 24 665 Day Care Center 160 tO 54 60 Reduction 5 6 internal 0 0 Pass-by 0 0 Non-pass-by 49 5.4 820-Shopping Center 11.65°i 230 249 Reduction 23 25 Internal 0 0 Pass-by 52 56 �\ Non-pass-Cy 155 168 • 230-Residential Condominium/Townhouse 581e 25 13 Reduction 2 1 Internal 0 0 Pass-by 0 0 Non-Pass-by 23 12 Total 333 369 Total Reduction 33 39 Total Internal 0 0 Total Pass-by 52 56 Total Non-pass-by 353 294 (11 1000 So Fffr GrassFNxvA.ee (a Swderls (31 10NSq Feeler sLeceaak Anse , (4) Cwesfngtmts Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 130 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 PERIOD SETTING ,„,, DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable,Time Period,and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis,To record any notes,dick * Add Notes above. PROJECT NAME. VANOERBILT C=OMMONS-SCENARIO t ANALYSIS NAME (PM peek How ) LANDUSE I PEN T SIZE TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXJT TOTAL { VARIABLE CI 151-Mini-Warehouse 1 1000 Sq.Feet Gros v) 95.55 Weekday,Peek Ha J Awe a e 13 12 25 LLL 0.28 710-Gene Office Bending !I Caston Rate Q g �1000 Sq:Feet Grow 10 I P.M.P.M-Pee�v 01 6 28 34 Rate 344 4 720-Medical-Dental Office 1000 sq Feet Grosi v 10 Best Fe(LOG) v Building Weekday,Peds Ha.v� 10 27 37 LOT)=0.91n(X).�1�.5t31 Q 565-Day Care Centel f Students 9) 180 Weekday..peak Hoo L.i1 Best Fit(LOG) i 54 60 114 Ln(T)=0 88Ln(X)•0.27 R 820-Showing Center 1000 Sq Feet Gros•01 71.65 [Weekday,Peak Ho€O Fit(LOG) 0 6230 249 479 Ln(T)=067Ln(X)•3.31 230-Residential ,�-...)1I Best Fit(LOG) v 0 CondankiurrJTownhouse IDesangUnits 1-�N 58 Weekday,.Peak Holpv �� 25 13 38 i--11 Ln('n=0 82Ln(X)•0.32 up The rime periods do not match TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Specify a percentage by which the Entry Trip and Exit Trip will be reduced for each Land Use,This reduction is applied to the Entry Trip and Exit Trip from the previous section.To record any notes,click t'+Add Notes above. LANE)USE ENTRY REDUCTION ADJUSTED ENTRY EXIT REDUCTION ADJUSTED ESFT 151.Mini-Warehouse Ca* 12 10 11 710-General Mice Building =)% 5 [10 )% 25 .�� 720-Medicd-Dents Offic a Building D% 9 10 24 565-Day Care Center C)% 49 (10 1% 54 820-Shopping Center F-116 207 [10 }% 224 230-Residential Condominium/Townhouse 10 23 [10 ]% 12 INTERNAL TRIPS 9 EXTERNAL TRIPS Specify the percentage of Pass-by Trips for each Land Use.The percentage will be reduced from the total number of External Trips from the previous section.To record any notes,click--Add Notes above. 1 The V icon preceding the Pass-by%value indicates data provided by ITE.Clicking the icon changes a custom Pass-by%value to data provided by ITE. I.AND USE EXTERNAL TRIPS PASS-EY?.. PASS-BY TRIPS NON-PASS-BY TRIPS 151-Mint-Warehouse 23 0 0 23 1 710-General Office Buifdng 30 tO }s 0 30 720-Medical-Dental Office Building 33 F4 i% 0 33 565-Day Care Center 103 10 )s 0 103 820-Shopping Center 431 Q[25 .% 108 323 230-Residential Condonkniumffownhouse 35 [0 )s 0 35 .ice Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 131 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits (4 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 132 Vanderbilt Commons—PUDA and GMPA—TIS—November 2016 /"'"'• so .1 tV.-'o NA h 0 CD CD a, — .411•1•1111%, c9..) C. 0 '".. ...> , . 6, 6..... . . , u, (7) C) N CV CN -- ; 1' C i • 0 ' C) -0-- J cp in Ln — o 0 — , •. 1 0 .....7 c, 0). cp „ r". a — g 0 „......., * ' .. C.. -(...9 I cp ti) . e-- (.0 • II . c:, . cpQ -- 0., c, ..R I I I 14-) ...... LID 0 • -_, * * 74 , S .,. , ,..4 0 -.., ..... C, z •,- 0 0 Pr 0 co z m F IU Z LU 1 a i 16 g W 1 ff CL cp cp 1 AummummumiL „....-..„ Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 133 Vanderbilt Commons-PUDA and GMPA-TIS-November 2016 i t s a :3 I I x j M_ sI! s t. 1� 1 i N r c� o_ C o_ CL to a "''' 0 s to i .0„, ., . ,,, 00 . 2 O 9 21 cam, , to . a a r r P'- o N OD 2 d d lie ilats t ''''' N". .„, P-•- r a g i a iimir Z a 0 "±' >' D DCa� Zs z V lig a. / k Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 134 Vanderbilt Commons-PUDA and GMPA-TIS-November 2016 i s £: I t t { Ry j #f x \�I x o _o I o o o 0 Iv Imo' 1 . 8, 0 0 v ix 1o' INIMNIM o o N ) o (-4 1 L„-, g 8 a d CP ■ 8.,'43' � a 0 II0 O OAID I �- <- ■ ." ■ ■ o e ■ o a ■ o tt) ,=, o ■ lf) L C} _ 1116 fi:i_..-.7 Tia * ...g 5 a Ce p O Q Z m 16.1 Q 0 COD V) W Ce N H m U. Zm3 .� 0NI- WZ mI-- < jI- 2W z D You — Q. r 0 p O 0 d a a Qa o 0 > • Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 135 Vanderbilt Commons-PUDA and GMPA-TIS-November 2016 L i 1 I I W 1; I I• 'h. , co M - • 2 .. Q- (9 t9 d a_ _4i/ ti) t., co a. . N II (�V ry ■ 4+ 0 2 d rn ▪ a 1cL ......j x_ ".-. M r i CL U' Y C4zd22 0 C 410 00) Ili re >...L L D 'n . aim = 0 I" nom. > a 0 a a 2 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions,PA Page 136 DIE pAYRAPN EXHIBIT "R" LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE DAVIDSN ENGINEERINOG EXHIBIT"R" COMPARATIVE LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS The proposed development known as Vanderbilt Commons is a 14.49 acre commercial property located in Section 34, Township 48 South, and Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The property is bounded by Vanderbilt Beach Road to the south, Pristine Drive to the west, and Buckstone Drive to the east. The subject property has a mixed-use designation under the current Carolina Village Mixed Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning; Ordinance #05-19. The property is platted with an existing 60-foot private right-of-way (Vanderbilt Way) and six proposed lots. For this analysis, the site will be conceptually developed to the maximum standards using the current project zoning and the proposed zoning amendment. Currently, the site contains an existing gravity sanitary system servicing the six proposed site development lots and 8' diameter lift station with ultimate discharge into the North County Water Reclamation Facility (NCWRF) via a 16" force main via C.R. 951. All proposed lots will gravity flow to the lift station where is will be conveyed through low pressure pipe to the aforementioned NCWRF. Fire and potable water utilities will be provided through an existing on-site 8-inch water main within Vanderbilt Way right-of-way. The previously proposed MPUD (current zoning) lots consist of the following residential and non-residential uses at build-out: Office Park 60,000 sf Total: 60,000 sf Shopping Center 90,000 sf Total: 90,000 sf Residential Condominium/Townhouse 64 Dwelling Units Total: 64 Dwelling Units Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA Exhibit"R"-Comparative Level of Service(LOS)Analysis January 2017 www.davidsonengineering.com DIE DAVIDSON FNGI NF FRING The newly proposed Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (proposed zoning amendment) consists of the following at build-out: Self-Storage 95,550 sf Total: 95,550 sf Daycare Building 12,800 sf Total: 12,800 sf General Office 10,000 sf Medical Office 10,000 sf Total: 20,000 sf Shopping Center Retail/Restaurant 71,650 sf Total: 71,650 sf Residential Condominium/Townhouse 58 Dwelling Units Total: 58 Dwelling Units The Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan establishes Levels of Service for the following: Arterial and Collector Roads Surface Water Management Systems Potable Water Systems Sanitary Sewer Systems Solid Waste Disposal Facilities Parks and Recreation Facilities Public School Facilities Each of the areas will be examined for the proposed developments in this summary report. P—\ Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA Exhibit"R"-Comparative Level of Service(LOS)Analysis January 2017 www.davidsonengineering.com DC DAVIDSON ENG�NEERPN av Arterial and Collector Roads Based on the roadway network link analysis result, the proposed development at build-out is not a significant and adverse traffic generator for the roadway network traffic at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate proposed development generated trips without adversely affecting the adjacent roadway network level of service. Table 1-Project Trip Generation (Net New)—Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Development Enter Exit Total Proposed GMPA 253 294 547 (Total non-Pass-By Trips) Approved MPUD 228 339 567 (Total Non-Pass-By Trips) Proposed Net New Traffic (Total Non-Pass-By Trips) 25 (45) (20) Net Increase/(Net Decrease) Surface Water Management Systems Currently the site's surface water management system is designed with two stormwater management basins. Basin #1 consists of the Pristine Drive right-of-way allocated within the cost sharing agreement (OR 3,635 Page 1,672) –this basin consists of±1.00 acres. Basin #2 will consist of ±14.35 acres (the proposed Vanderbilt Commons development), with the omission ±0.14 acres that are included within Basin#1 due to stormwater management locations. Basin#1 The proposed water management system will utilize existing inlets to convey storm water volume to detention areas. The off-site water management improvements within Basin #1 will provide water quality volumes and attenuate the 25-year storm event within its designated basin (±1.00 acres). Outfall for the basin will be directly into the Vanderbilt Canal. Basin#2 The interconnected stormwater management system will provide 0.50-inch dry pre-treatment system and outfall via two control structures into the on-site existing lake where the remaining water quality volume and attenuation of the 25-year 3-day storm event will be provided. The stormwater management system for the site has been approved by Collier County under PL201500014563. Therefore, no level of service issues is created by either of the proposed site build-out conditions with respect to surface water management. Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA Exhibit"R"-Comparative Level of Service(LOS)Analysis January 2017 www.davidsonengineering.com DE Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer Systems The proposed build-outs will be served by Collier County Public Utilities; the same operating entity for the existing site. Build-out conditions are shown in each table of calculations below. Although the previously approved mixed-use development is less than the potable demand created by the maximum conceptually proposed commercially developed site, the increase is insignificant and will not create an adverse effect on the existing system. The Florida Administrative Code 64E-6 was used to identify level of service for each type of development. Table 2—Previously Approved Mixed Use Level of Service Peak Daily Average Daily Demand,GPD* Description Unit Type GPD/Unit #Units Demand,GPD General Office 60,000 sf 100 sf 15 600 9,000 40,500 Shopping Center 90,000 sf 1 sf 0.1 90,000 9,000 40,500 Residential 64 Units Units 200 64 12,800 57,600 Total(GPD): 30,800 gpd 138,600 gpd *Factor of 4.5 was used to determine Peak Daily Demand Table 3—Proposed Conceptual Development Level of Service Average Daily Peak Daily * Description Unit Type GPD/Unit #Units Demand,GPD Demand,GPD Unit/Every 2 Units Self-Storage 478 Units over 200 1 1 200 139 339 1,526 160 students/ Student/ Daycare Facility 28 staff Staff 10 15 160 28 4,630 20,835 General Office 10,000 sf 100 sf 15 100 1,500 6,750 1 Doctors/4 Doctor/ Medical Office Employees Employee 250 15 1 4 310 1,395 Shopping Center 61,650 sf 1 sf 0.1 61,650 6,165 27,743 Restaurant 155 Seats Seats 40 155 6,200 27,900 Fast Food 50 Seats Seats 20 50 1,000 4,500 Residential 58 Units Units 200 58 11,600 52,200 Total(GPD): 31,744 gpd 142,848 gpd *Factor of 4.5 was used to determine Peak Daily Demand Solid Waste Disposal Facilities Solid waste is provided by Waste Management, a private contract provider. Commercial accounts are charged by the service provider directly with rates set by the Board of County Commissioners through contract negotiation with the provider. As previously mentioned, the Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA Exhibit"R"-Comparative Level of Service(LOS)Analysis January 2017 www.davidsonengineering.com DE DAVIDSON FNGINEE RING proposed zoning will decrease the intensity of the development and thereby will not negatively impacts the existing implemented systems. Parks and Recreation Facilities None of the proposed build-outs will create a negative impact on Parks and Recreation Facilities. The level of service is not significantly or adversely impacted by either of the proposed build- outs. Public School Facilities None of the proposed build-outs will create a negative impact on Public School Facilities. The uses will not impact school attendance. The level of service is not significantly or adversely impacted by either of the proposed build-outs. Fire and EMS Facilities The proposed build-outs have no measurable impact on Fire and EMS Facilities. It should be assumed that newer buildings will be constructed to current NFPA and building code standards which may reduce the likelihood of related calls. The level of service is not significantly or adversely impacted by either of the proposed build-outs. Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA Exhibit"R"-Comparative Level of Service(LOS)Analysis January 2017 www.davidsonengineering.com WI i �W -c c m E ,_, o v O lO m o O O a Q u'1 Ql N0 N r O o OD > a h m 1-r ', N1 ON LP lD f- In N V N 0 ao Y a0 W m N c N N V a m c .a a O 0 C VI.0 CO E ` a! .O Q - >' O O O 0, Om O l0 O O as L 0 O . m m v . a04 ° al n on . f0 m o a`) o Q `° m `o co V m O m d O 1-r1 . v1 ti C OD u LO m f0 .- 0 0 N N .--I Md c o H C C O Ou O O O E c+ oN 0 N v cs O u-) O O V1 .-I .--I O Ul 0 O O a O c ra O lJl c-I V N e-I .--1 .--I O L V. N N O. m £ d N O N CL w y (7 O p I 14 O of 3 o a C 0) 1' oN v m O a > it, Y ` Ea@ o > `o 'C 0 0 a _ a 0 3 0 m E \ 1- O 9 C 0) . (0 ra C O Ta 'c 0 \ D O. 0) ~ VS to m T U ro 0 o N y 3 4,i u ---... > -o o 'a CU o .6-, m O m i a L a) 'O j t O 0 L a) T O 0V N O w a L.+ 00 O Iy�j m 'ts c O N co R w N fa 0) V L 0 aJ v, c O c _co .--i O m a t a t ., o v v .� E 7 m on -o a 0 c o •••• c o $ o 00 « i v m O '' .9 0 j c '" oo 00 9 .2 Y a 'o C f0 c N O G v d m « '. ra 3 N o w ..-1 a' •` 0 a N c a v ON O -o 6 E0) o v, 0 E 0 o 9 °oO w o ) w O E v 0 .c v a HI ; _uooOu v 7 `^ aOfl? O « > E. u OLO ? NO — .�CO av a 3 _� cv3 rraa Lc)in a! uin 3 al O ^c > c ° ,- o w ° wa, -1 = _c a Y a win c ooc c' o o ° a � — 3 r, u v ° E m 0 a, v o v w ai I= p T ¢ ,,, w i° •o U .7' 1111 w ce c 'J a1 d s on '= oa vcrrao f a v 73 H u�O 2 10 r2 aJ o r-1 CO O a O L0M H a O W a) g 8 a O- -o c V .-I a Q y .-i F- 0 0 m N D N '..-e.), N -Oc 0 v O 11", a a > O o w --O p a '7 w N r w c0 .) "-O `^ u rroo -a w al c m l7 v1 0 v1 _ 1. 2 . I— V 0 a Q LL O D O O. in a 3 N ro z in 0 Q cc cc in N DE DAVIDSON EXHIBIT "S" UTILITY AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com Exhibit "S" August 12, 2015 Jessica Harrelson, Project Coordinator Davidson Engineering 4365 Davis Blvd., Suite 201 Naples, FL 34104 VIA: E-MAIL Subject: Vanderbilt Commons (fka Carolina Commons) Parcels#: 25525600520, 25525600546, 25525600562, 25525600588, 25525600041, 25525600067, 25525600083, 25525600096, and 25525600025 Water &Wastewater Availability Dear Ms. Harrelson: Wastewater service is available for the above referenced parcels via an existing 10" wastewater force main adjacent to the property along Pristine Drive. Water service is available for the above referenced parcels via an existing 10" water main stub out adjacent to the property along Pristine Drive. Specific connection points for the system tie-ins to wastewater lines may be made after submission and approval of the hydraulic calculations by the Planning and Project Management Division, validating that the up/downstream systems are adequate to handle the increase in flow. This letter implies no guarantee that other developments throughout the District will not have an impact on the quantity of sewage treatment and disposal capacity available to this property until the project has received a commitment for service. Should sewage treatment and disposal capacity not be available, the Developer would be required to provide an interim means to provide these services until the District's facilities have the adequate capacity to serve the project. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at (239) 252-2583. Sincerely, f i Nathan Beals, PMP, Project Manager Planning and Project Management Division cc: Aaron Cromer, Principal Project Manager Eric Fey, Engineering Review n DE DAYRR9t, EXHIBIT "T" NARRATIVE & JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROPOSED GMPA Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE DAVIDSON f N C.1.SF F PI50 Narrative & Justification of the Proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) EXHIBIT "T" Introduction In coordination with Collier County staff regarding the 15.88-acre expansion area, it was discovered that the allowable 150,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area was not added to the original GMPA text language along with a proposed 60/40 square footage split(90,000 square feet of retail and 60,000 square feet of office).The previously approved square footage(without the original proposed split contemplated in 2001), along with an additional 50,000 square feet for commercial land uses is now being requested to the Subdistrict's expansion area. The proposed total of 200,000 square feet, in the amended 15.88-acre expansion area, and the proposed Vanderbilt Commons MPUD (formerly known as the Carolina Village MPUD), will be available for all of the previously permitted land uses along with the approved air conditioned, enclosed mini-and self-storage warehousing(Group 4225) per HEX NO. 2014—38. Growth Management Plan Policy Adherence The proposed GMPA also furthers the vision of the Collier County's Future Land Use Element. The following Objectives and Policies have been considered in this application: Policy 5.3: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map; requiring that any changes to the Urban Designated Areas be contiguous to an existing Urban Area boundary; and, encouraging the use of creative land use planning techniques and innovative approaches to development in the County's Agricultural/Rural designated area, which will better serve to protect environmentally sensitive areas, maintain the economic viability of agriculture and other predominantly rural land uses, and provide for cost efficient delivery of public facilities and services. Response: The proposed GMPA does not contribute to urban sprawl. The subject property is within the existing urban service area and will not require any special or additional costs to provide necessary services. The property has been contemplated for mixed- residential and or commercial land uses per the existing Subdistrict language. The permitted land uses will place no greater burden on community facilities than did prior uses of the property. Policy 5.4: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, subject to meeting the compatibility criteria of the Land Development Code (Ordinance 91-102,adopted October 30, 1991, as amended. Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE DAVIDSON CNGINEERING Response:The subject property is compatible with and complimentary to its surrounding land uses. The Subdistrict is bordered to the west and north by residential land uses and PUD zoning. To the south lies Vanderbilt Beach Road and across its right-of-way, the land is designated Estates Zoning with residential homes present. The expansion area is bound to the east by the commercial PUD-Mission Hills; which is also within the Vanderbilt Beach Road / Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict without restriction. Policy 7.3 All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. Response: The proposed GMPA will be a companion petition to a PUD amendment that will continue to provide appropriate connections and interconnections. Additionally, the platted Vanderbilt Way right-of- way furthers the intent of Policy 7.3. State Statutory Criteria:Chapter 163.3177(6)(a) 2 and 8 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities,and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Response(s): a. The amount of land being considered for this request remains the same and will accommodate the land uses as defined and proposed. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population—Please see Attachment D c. The land is still mostly undeveloped. There is an SDP in approval for the self-storage use. There is also an approved plat that has set the site up for future commercial development. d. County water and sewer utilities facilities are currently available in the Vanderbilt Beach Road right-of-way and will not be significantly impacted by development of the subject property as identified by Exhibit R(the Level of Service report) Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE rNr.rntr[rr�n�n e.As this site had previously never been developed, it does not rise to the level of redevelopment. This criteria is not applicable. f.As this site is not near any military installation, this criteria is not applicable. g.As this site is not near any airport, this criteria is not applicable. h.As this site has already been zoned for mixed-use development and has gone through a previous growth management plan amendment, this request does not add to the problem of urban sprawl. The request is in keeping with the existing plan of commercial development in Collier County. i. As noted above, his site has already been zoned for mixed-use development and has pone through a previous growth management plan amendment. By virtue of its previous land use and zoning entitlements, the subject property will continue to advance the job creation, capital investment, and economic development goals within Collier County. j. As noted above, his site has already been zoned for mixed-use development and has gone through a previous growth management plan amendment. The request to increase and define square footage within this request,continues in line with the planned development pattern for this portion of Collier County. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land,soils,topography, natural resources,and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. Response(s): a. County water and sewer utilities facilities are currently available in the Vanderbilt Beach Road right-of-way and will not be significantly impacted by development of the subject property as identified by Exhibit R (the Level of Service report). Additionally, other County resources such as emergency services are available and show no significant impacts to service by the proposed and existing land uses already deemed appropriate by Collier County. b. The land is still mostly undeveloped. There is a Site Development Plan approval for the proposed self-storage use. There is also an approved plat that has set the site up for future commercial development.As noted above,his site has already been zoned for mixed-use development and has gone through a previous growth management plan amendment. The request to increase and define square footage within this request, continues in line with the planned development pattern for this portion of Collier County. c. The amount of land being considered for this request remains the same and will accommodate the land uses as defined and proposed. Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE DAVIDSON f N61 NE E R INN ATTACHMENT "A" CCPC Transmittal Hearing Minutes, held on May 20, 2004 (from original GMPA Application CP-2003-1) Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com May 20,2004 Second by Mr.Adelstein. Motion fails with 4 yes—4 no. (Those voting affirmative not provided for the record) This will move forward to the Board of Commissioners without a recommendation from the Planning Commission. E. CP-2003-1, Petition requesting amendment to Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map to expand Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Blvd. Commercial Sub-district, and to restrict some of the uses in this expansion area to include+/-15.88 acres located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and % mile west of CR-951. Mr. Budd stepped out for a few minutes in which Mr. Strain presided over the meeting. PETITIONER Rich Yovano — . s e Ione, • ey • - • i : • - d the existing Vanderbilt Be h/Colh B •. Co , ,erci• dist t to add an a ox. 15 acre parcel to the west. showe. e . alize, A • - rn. •• - is Mis in Hills. (Shopping Center)Prope is at • e s f V. -rb. 'oad . s i flier Blvd. ' •uesting to add approx. 150,0 . . . .,e fee .f retail .. d ffice— :.,0. .1 square feet . retail,90,000 square feet of office. Located next to the Wolf Creek PUD,the Nagel Craig Business Park has not yet been adopted,but shown on map. Across the street from the Mission Church, a PUD and Vanderbilt County Club. Going through the process they held meeting with Vanderbilt County Club representatives and Island Walk to let them know what they are requesting to do. They were favorably impressed so far with the Comp Plan Amendment knowing a more specific PUD will be presented in the future. No opposition from those major communities. The Wolf Creek PUD is not yet developed with similar people involved in this particular request to go to commercial use. Obviously they will not put a commercial use next to a residential development which would in any way hurt that proposed development. The staff report is recommending approval and made a couple of clarifications. One provision in the district stating uses limited to single story—they want to clarify that retail is limited to the first floor only in that multi-level building. If they wanted to do retail with one or two floors above that,wanted to clarify it is consistent with the language in the District— Second—Don Scott has no concerns with 951 north of Golden Gate Blvd, scheduled to begin construction early next year and no issues with Vanderbilt Road. He knows they meet concurrency management rules. Not deficient from a concurrency standpoint. Mr. Weeks and he have discussed how the concurrency management provisions of the Comp 27 May 20, 2004 Plan work with Policy 1.1.2 in a Capital Improvement Element. Agreed to discuss beyond the meeting to figure out if there is an inconsistency. Need to work on language. Mr. Murray asked about the loop road-was a requirement of the Mission Hills PUD and is still valid. Mr. Strain asked Mr. Weeks if he had any concerns of the clarifications Mr. Yovanovich is asking for. Mr. Weeks did not—they will discuss further at a later date. The second thing in which it may be mute is staff wants to look at the traffic information submitted. As he said earlier,the significant impact threshold of 3% is only applicable if an affected segment of the roadway is deficient. Staff may have misread some of the information submitted by the applicant in which the deficient segment of Vanderbilt Beach Road may not be significantly impacted. Mr. Bill Hoover—Hoover Planning—held meetings with the neighbors -Island Walk. They have a committee of 12 he has met with. He had met at the Vanderbilt County Club with Commissioner Coletta,Mr. Feder and members of Development Services staff of what they were doing in the neighborhood. Both neighborhoods know what is being proposed. Mr. Strain as . o 'ey oil al egati he q s ion was an ere due to a different own: hip. All of the co uniti-• ill - inte ed wi h op road tha ill be there. Wolf Creek will ha . s to it. STAFF Glenn Heath—staff's recommended language is a bit different than that submitted by the petitioner but discussed the disagreement on the transportation language which is the primary difference between the two. Other than that they are shown with strike through and underlines. Mr.Yovanovich stated they need to clarify the stories and David and he need to work, before the Board meeting, about the double underlined language in pursuant to Policy 1.1.2. (How the concurrency management system works) They don't agree to the underlined language. Mr.Richardson asked if it would be appropriate to add language to make mixed use permissive. Mr.Heath said it would be hard to put residential on this particular parcel and have commercial because of size. Mr. Richardson suggested some incentives be added. Discussion followed on the Growth Management, the density allowed, guidance on units per acre and height. They should all be in the plan amendment. Hearing was closed for motion and discussion. 28 May 20, 2004 Mr. Richardson moved to recommend this Growth Management Plan Amendment 2003-1 be transmitted with the following additions: Those already covered between the applicant and staff concerning traffic,definition of stories, and further recommend to put some wheels underneath the direction the CCPC and BCC had on their discussion on including mixed use and Growth Management Plan changes. Give direction to staff that mixed use be permitted, residential and commercial in this property, and appropriate,in order to have an incentive to permit that, that the density is allowed to go up to 16 units to the acre,which he would say would include raising the number of stories that would be permitted up to 4 stories. Second by Brad Schiffer. Mr.Murray recognizes the density is required in order to motivate but thinking two things. When getting to the 4th story it becomes an issue with elevators and cost rise etc. What are the permitted uses in the area that are to be developed and are they compatible with residential. He asked how they would envision it. Mr. Richardson said they are trying to provide incentives to the development community to have residences mixed in with an opportunity with Commercials. An appropriate densit is to get something more . fordab - I . I le in housing stock and sup i • •re Mr. Murray , ed ab• p 11111 -y d; ; they s . • le there I day trying to plan the projeI Mr. Schiffer • at le• two o • oors a r idential; ma it a 4 story element. Mr. Richardson accepted the change. Mr. Strain was concerned that they went to the neighborhood and if they make changes those neighbors are not aware of what those changes are. Mr. Yovanovich reminded them they still have to go through a PUD. Many of the issues will be dealt with at the adoption hearing. Mr.Adelstein stated now they could create something that is very,very bad and would like to take out the number of units per acre and let it be decided at a future date. Marjorie Student stated they need some kind of guidance and the density and intensities need to be in the plan. Comp Plan is supposed to be like a constitution and set general parameters and already expressed her concerns in the past years of getting as specific as they are. It is not supposed to be that way. She has a concern about every time they want to change it they get to a long drawn out amendment process and if DCA has a problem, and then the County has to defend a lawsuit. Not a land development. Mr. Abernathy said the County has had zero success with mixed use residential over commercial and fanciful thinking that someone 10 miles from downtown is going to want to be on the 4th floor. They are talking about what is doable in Collier County. 29 May 20, 2004 Motion carried unanimously 8-0. BREAK—2:13 PM RECONVENED—2:25 PM CP-2003-2, Petition requesting amendment to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map to establish Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Sub-district,allowing commercial uses in the C-3 district with a maximum of 50,000 square feet,for a+/-acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Livingston/Radio Road. PETITIONER Robert Duane—Hole Montes & Assoc.—property is located at Radio Road and Livingston Road and 5 acres zoned industrial. Demonstrated a need for alternate uses in the location, els-ciall retail uses. There are no compatibilit issues and preciate their support. - Mr. Strain w, ed to IW ' -•tifica • _av eside of Maplewood, Briarwood,F. ire . .u erw• Mr. Duane res.. . • e h.. of giv- notific• o ecause it is industrial corner surrounded by industrial development surrounded by two arterial roadways and did not provide any other specific notice. No sign was put on the property. The area is now vacant. Mr. Richardson wondered if he would support the discussion they had on the previous Growth Management Plan adding residential components to this project. Mr. Duane had no problem adding that to the mix—not a requirement, surrounded by industrial buildings, an arterial roadway will carry up to 60,000 vehicles a day, a small site of 5 acres,not lending itself to mixed use,but for his support, if he wanted to add similar language that it is a permitted residential development and is a permitted use up to 16 units per acre, and increase the height of the building from 35 feet to 45 feet,they will take it into consideration when they come in for their PUD. Mr. Strain asked who Radio Joint Venture was—response was John Walklin—85% interest and Roderick LeeWynn of Naples has a 15%interest with a general limited partnership. The issue is the ownership of Radio Joint Venture is; persons could be someone that the Commissioners know or have done or do business with. Mr. Weeks apologized that they did not catch the information. The staff will work with the petition to gather that information. 30 DE DAVIDSON ri4n�H rrRIIJr. ATTACHMENT "B" ORIGINAL GMPA- APPLICATION TO AMEND THE GMP Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER GP-aDa3—I DATE RECEIVED cl I aq I °y PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE SUFFICIENT This application,with all required supplemental data and information,must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 941-403-2300 (Fax 941-643-6968), The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing, The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies, For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 (attached). If you have any questions,please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 941- 403-2300. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS L GENERAL INFORMATION A. Name of Applicant William L. Hoover,Manager Company Catalina Plaza,LLC. Address 3785 Airport Road N., Suite B-1 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-403-8899 Fax Number 239-403-9009 B. Name of Agent Richard D. Yovanovich Company Goodlette, Coleman&Johnson,P.A. Address 4001 Tamiami Trail North,Suite 300 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-435-3535 Fax Number 239-435-1218 and Name of Agent William L. Hoover,AICP Company Hoover Planning& Dev., Inc. Address 3785 Airport Road North, Suite B-1 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34105 Phone Number 239-403-8899 Fax Number 239-403-9009 C. Name of Owner(s) of Record Vanderbilt Beach Road Land Trust. c/o Mark L. Lindner, Trustee,Naples Realty Services Address 4099 N. Tamiami Trail, 2nd Floor City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 262-4333 Fax Number 262-7811 D. Name,Address and Qualifications of Persons Working on Petition: Jeff L. Davidson,P.E.,Davidson Engineering, Inc., 2154 Trade Center .-- Way, Suite#3, Naples, FL 34109 Bachelor's Degree in Civil Engineering,Univ. of S. Florida, Tampa, FL William L. Hoover,AICP, Hoover Planning&Dev.,Inc., 3785 Airport Road N., Suite B-1,Naples,FL 34105 Associate's Degree in Real Estate, Bachelor's Degree in Business Services, and Master's Degree in Geography and Urban Planning,all from the University of Toledo, Toledo, OH Richard D. Yovanovich, Goodlette, Coleman& Johnson,P.A., 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300,Naples,FL 34013 Bachelor's Degree in Business and Economics from Furman University. Law Degree from University of South Carolina. Jeremy Sterk, Hoover Planning&Dev.,Inc., 3785 Airport Road N., Suite B-1,Naples,FL 34105 Bachelor's Degree in Biology, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud,MN Nicola Weston,Hoover Planning&Dev.,Inc.,3785 Airport Road N., Suite B-1,Naples, FL 34105 Bachelor's Degree in Marketing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Peter Schoenauer, P.E., Davidson Engineering,Inc.,2154 Trade Center Way, Suite#3, Naples, FL 34109 Bachelor's Degree in Civil&Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam,NY 1-A II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership _Not Applicable B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock Not Applicable C. If the property is owned by a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Stock Vanderbilt Beach Road Land Trust Mark L. Lindner, Trustee.Naples Realty Services 4099 N. Tamiami Trail,2nd Floor Naples, Florida, 34103 The Vanderbilt Beach Road Land Trust has the following beneficiaries: See the Page 2-A. D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Stock Not Applicable Vanderbilt Beach Road Land Trust Breakdown of Beneficiaries Name Address Ownership Philip Duff Trust 6 Regency Circle Lake,St.Louis,MO 2.5% Sole Beneficiary of the Philip Duff Trust: Betty Ann Duff (Same address as Trust) Betty Ann Duff Trust 6 Regency Circle Lake,St.Louis,MO 2.5% Sole Beneficiary of the Betty Ann Duff Trust: Philip Duff (Same address as Trust) Charles&Helen Marie Zell Trust 12183 Bluebird Circle,Coon Rapids,MN 2.5% Beneficiaries of the Charles&Helen Marie Zell Trust: Charles Zell,(Same address as Trust) Helen Marie Zell(Same address as Trust) Dean Lind IRA 1930 Princess Court,Naples,FL 5% Ronald Plassman 7024 Woodcroft Lane,Ft.Wayne,IN 20% Mark Plassman 2882 Brookside Bend Drive,Carmel,IN 15% Anne Plassman Trust 2882 Brookside Bend Drive,Carmel,IN 15% Sole Beneficiary of the Anne Plassman Trust: Anne Plassman (Same address as Trust) William Rapps 6580 Sable Ridge Lane,Naples,FL 2.5% Raymond Eschelman 13101 Pond Apple Drive,Naples,FL 5% Edwin F.Boynton Trust 13342 Rosewood Lane,Naples,FL 7.5% Sole Beneficiary of the Edwin F.Boynton Trust: Edwin F.Boynton (Same address as Trust) Robert F.Reynolds IRA 4423 Silver Fox Drive,Naples,FL 5% Robert J.McCracken 9362 Gulfshore Drive,Naples,FL 1.25% Joyce L.McCracken 9362 Gulfshore Drive,Naples,FL 1.25% Don P.Knopke Trust 14208 Canterbury Court,Leawood,KS 5% Beneficiaries of the Don P. Knopke Trust: Don P.Knopke(Same address as Trust) Carolyn Knopke(Same address as Trust) George Riebesell 6883 Red bay Park Road,Naples,FL 2.5% John Saltsman 194 14th Avenue South,Naples,FL 2.5% Mark Lindner 2206 Majestic Court,Naples,FL 2.5% L.l.Smith 5170 10 Avenue SW,Naples,FL 2.5% 2-A E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals. a Corporation, Trustee, or Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership William L. Hoover, Manager See Breakdown on Page 3-A Catalina Pia LLC. 3785 Airport Road N., Suite B-I Naples,FL 34105 Date of Contract: February 2003 F. If any contingency clause of contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation,partnership, or trust. Name and Address Not Applicable G. Date subject property( ) acquired leased( NA Term of lease yrs/mos. If,Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant,or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 3 BREAKDOWN OF MEMBERSHIP IN CATALINA PLAZA LLC Percenta le Owned Members'Names/Addresses FL 34104 5% Thomas Beaver,345 Esther Street,Naples, 13% Q.Grady&Nancy Minor,3800 Via Del Rey,Bonita Springs,FL 34134 3% Peter Schoenauer,2154 Trade Center Way,Naples,FL 34109 2.5% Jeffrey&Leaetta Davidson,2154 Trade Center Way,Naples,FL 34109 5% Richard&Catherine Shanahan,427 Barcelona Court,Marco Island,FL 34145 5% Randy Rose,3775 Airport Road N., Suite A,Naples, FL 34105 FL 34109 3.5% William&Charlene Hoover,5690 Wax MyrtleWay,Naples, 1.5% Jeremy Sterk&Rita Bhaduri-Sterk,2875 Garland Road,Naples,FL 34117 20% Thomas&Julie Hoover,4025 Hillman Road,Morral,OH 43337 30% Morning Glorys,Inc* 9225 Gulfshore Drive N.,Naples,FL 34108 6.5% Robert&Kay Hartman,21109 Pargillis Road,Bowling Green,OH 43402 5% Donald Rife 616 Brook Run Drive Westerville OH 43081 100% Total *Peter Tierney is President and Michael Moore is Vice-President President and own all of the stock of Morning Glorys,Inc. and their office is at this sameaddress. Catalina Land Group, Inc. is the manager of Catalina Plaza, LLC. William and Charlene Hoover own 100% of the stock in Catalina Land Group, Inc. William Hoover iissMinor ent, Charlene Hoover is Secretary/Treasurer, Jeremy Sterk is a Vice-President, and Q. Grady is a Vice-President of Catalina Land Group, Inc. 3-A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE SOUTH Y4 OF THE SOUTHWEST V.OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 34,TOWNSHIP 48 soum,RANGE 26 EAST;SUBJECT TO EXISTING RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD,SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER AND ACROSS THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF AND THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF. SEE ATTACHED SURVEY SKETCH LABELED ITEM ITLA B. GENERAL LOCATION Immediately north of Vanderbilt Beach Road,approximately '4,of a mile west of Collier Boulevard. C. PLANNING COMMUNITY Urban Estates D. TAZ 51 E. SIZE IN ACRES 15.88 Acres F.ZONING Agricultural G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN Being Developed as Residential FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION (S) Urban Residential Sub-district of the Urban- Mixed Use District IV. TYPE OF REQUEST A GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN EI.EMENT(S)TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Recreation/Open Space Traffic Circulation Sub-Element Mass Transit Sub-Element Aviation Sub-Element Potable Water Sub-Element Sanitary Sewer Sub-element NGWAR Sub-Element Solid Waste Sub-Element Drainage Sub-Element Capital Improvement Element CCME Element X Future Land Use Element Golden Gate Master Plan Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE(S) 24&25 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS:(Use-Gress--thfoughs-to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: The revised language is attached as Item IV.B. C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S)DESIGNATION FROM Urban Residential Subdistrict TO Additional Acreage in the Vanderbilt Beach\Collier Blvd.Sub-district D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S)AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page#) MAP 5B OF PAGE 29 of the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT. A revised map is attached as Item I V.D1 Also propose to amend the FUTURE LAND USE MAP, A revised FUTURE LAND USE MAP is attached as Item IV.D2, E. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED: Not Applicable 4 V. REQUIRED INFORMATION NOTE:ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN F'=400'.At least one copy reduced to 8 1/2x II shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE XX Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRYS,existing zoning)with subject property outlined. XX Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source,and date. XX Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION XX Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s)of subject property and adjacent lands,with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL XX Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE,COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM(FLUCCS CODE).NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN"A"ABOVE. XX Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish&Wildlife Service) and State(Florida Game&Freshwater Fish Commission)listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site(e.g.panther or black bear range,avian rookery,bird migratory route,etc.). XX . Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006,F.A.C.and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2(Copies attached). 1. INSERT"Y"FOR YES OR"N"FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern?(Reference 93-11.006(1)(a)(5),F.A.C.). If so,identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380,F.S.? (Reference 91-11.006 (1)(a)7.a,F.A.C.) N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c),F.S.? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.b,F.A.C.)Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County-wide population by more than 5%of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2).If yes,indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Y Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the Additional Area uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified to Sub—District (commercial, industrial, etc.)or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district?(Reference Rule 93-5.006(5)F.A.C.).If so,provide See attached data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use,and Marketing Study compatibility of use with surrounding land uses,and as it concerns protection V.D.4 of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 93-1 1.007, F.A.C.) 5 E. PUBLIC FACILITIES i Provide the exst1ng Level of Service Standard (LOS)and documentthe impact the proposed change wiU have on the following public facilities: XX Potable Water XX Sanitary Sewer XX Arterial & Collector Roads: Name specific road and LOS Vanderbilt Beach Road- LOS B Collier iBlnd' (C.R.951 )-I^OS F See attached Traffic Impact Study (item V'E 1C) XX Drainage XX Solid Waste XX Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential dmnoity, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amend- menL (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.5) 2. XX Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. vva|or, wower, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. XX 3. Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 'lood Zone `'}{" x»x Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). 0*& Location of wellflelds and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) NA Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable NA Coastal Management Boundary, If applicable ]y& High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). Q. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION XX $3,000 non-refundable filing fee, plus $30/acre for each affected acre for Future Land Use map amendments, made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal, NA $1,500 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. )0( Proof of ownership (Copy of deed) XX Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) XX 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps,at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed. 25 copies of the complete application will be required, 'Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1",400'or at a scale as determined during the pre-application meeting. Ail ,z4Vi.'41 t... a) .,,,,„.. . ,4‘ lk... e * 3 zo,,,t, _o SIMI' 717111; .> 1 cr . 2 > c.4viDyn1 "ti� •• t ! , I� R It t. I t ! I i ! t I 1 1 i (-0 11...11 1..0.... h I 1 WO 2114 4 ... 0 / -sr i; ... I I" , i I� ' 1 i N Pt tz! Lo 111T11:1119 i r Maszt to gi co ! fix t. ` 1 1 x ,1 ti Xw F t. I t. t. t. 4- 1,,,.. k. a 4- RR ■ Y!i h �� 1 A �N. zkX 11 g 2 Item IV.B (V)10. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict is located on the north side northwest quadrant of the intersection between the two (2) major roadways of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, consisting of approximately 33.45 acres of land for the existing area and 15.88 acres of land for the expansion area as depicted on Map 5-B. The intent of the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict is to provide convenient shopping, personal services and employment for neighboring and Golden Gate Estates residential areas. The Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict will reduce driving distances for neighboring residents and Golden Gate Estates residents, assist in minimizing the road network required, and reduce traffic impacts in this part of Collier County. This sSubdistrict is further intended to create a neighborhood focal point and any development within this Subdistrict will be designed in a manner to be compatible with the existing and future residential and institutional development in this neighborhood. Development intensity for this Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum of 200,000 350,000 square feet of gross floor area. Rezonings are encouraged to be in the form of a PUD zoning districti which must contain development standards to ensure that all commercial uses will be compatible with neighboring residential and institutional uses. In addition to retail uses and other uses permitted in the Plan, financial institutions, business services, and professional and medical offices shall be permitted. Exclusive of the 33.45 acres within the previously approved Mission Hills PUD, the following land uses shall not be permitted: gas stations, convenience stores with gas pumps, fast food restaurants with drive-through lanes, and tire stores. Retail uses shall be limited to a single-story. Financial services and offices shall be limited to three stories. All principal buildings shall be set back a minimum of one (1)foot from the Subdistrict boundaries for each foot of building height. Development within each project or PUD Rezoning the-Stiklistriet shall be required to have common site, signage and building architectural elements. The property Each project or PUD Rezoning shall provide for potential both pedestrian and vehicular interconnections with adjacent properties. Item IV.D1 MAP 55 VANDERBILT BEACH / COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLOHIDA ui q �`+ ,still`, • , ` •.i . �...i ^� 1 z., a n Ilf i —� — g g ' ERE 7141 1.__--L l 1 �y ' ' r e E 1 q9 q,iuvn ro 1 1 1 Ni a— k--.l on.a�1 , r.— °57 s 4 e - -c 1 --� x. � R'/•E _...r-fir uwluul lug,—`_ I 'v 5-'.. '(-mei 1I. 1.1$ _ 1�i N{It ii� (R t>, ♦ ,lgiI!-,..„ g-tis7..,,,---Ainiii L_�r�. ,--d----- --- Fi. 114 }1 ' -. � s 1 ---- IW ,I . fl Ir., —_ . i , h \� N* F 04,''' I I �fno V .ll IP 1_ _; • . III MI� .ii li ' N ---J- _ , Pal !—' II _.1411_IN1� _ i JI �. 1 1 .,.. ... ..� 1i 511+ , WA' t . i _,,i,...... 1 d __IF 1 . 4 . FiAet04C I . I ri_l i _f i ilL _ 1 , , I , tig 113004.40 i — I I 111111111___I : _.__ I I—. -- '' acro , �//�LEIGEND i,,i I 1 ' I V //1 weuis1111V nv.nm ar.,'xcs AM. -'OMIT xray o Iooa rt, t000 rt. l/l'Ji OAR-3 n' rum, , u SUMO wear OAR-�/mm rai.WI.•• i Existing Vanderbilt Beach Rd. / Collier Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict Proposed Additional Area for Subdistrict 29 L 1 T 5S S l T 62 1 I T 61 S I T 65 S I T 46 SI T 46 S I T 47 5 I T 46 S I .Ill ! atill if# i# iii - „if j _. ii �$ i`1 ejj v ` 1 14_,.. - - f a ;SOat1 g- yil --1"m""i e fi1 - T !1j I �[ id : cN . 1 i II; - if / �lit r ' Ill R e ..4----- I�'r,/y' ' %//// ,,&-\-,'.\\\�\�\�® reit r • #`i 1 e - 14 34, ,, EL fa ��.. , ...,.... ,___ • SII ! ! 1;L1111i111J ' , , it' 1 11111 4 `.:;,/ i'l f f a41st -'.,rte, t . c a A� ,. � {l't,,lll,.4x +t t tt. 11.fr �`�y ` rr f� �ti 1I 1l�p/IOlF }t t" . ._ on ! `T 1. F 4 it I'' #�t l 1.1lF.1�7:7 Qk,4yf _}.. . a l4, t1 t ';r firP1 [r t 3 ^r _ ,a f--- l t4^ : ut E t ,t i..I:.1. s:1l�� ff „ittif �l 1111±'t3 it.. 47.17,1111l111111IHR 11.211.::17i":".; E E iim=l A U1iIjI!. .,'.. .. .. ' - ' ',. : 111111:lli ii T fill- ifN Y I m ., ..,,, , , /i II i f DO oaloq P11111 I $ TTIRI!IT!IflhiWI if LIR 'III 1I I1II i I i 1 I FeyI / I ®®m;..i_i ❑ l ;/` I.1 I ill 1 II I I ill I SS41 1 5291 1 SIS1 1 5151 1 SSt1 I SS61 I 1Lf 1 I 1it1 1 I 1 w3i v iv g �"'� cn if Q T m V € K I •0 m m i 4. e N Raj CD ii O� 44 X\ E m OE 0 — .\\ \ 1.!‘\\\\ i SD 0 1 1450N aci0 P____ Aeinsci MI MOH laep AOL coK 13 [ ; 4 8ii i N p o V I e1 Z r=,000' e -, • ... . N'4',.....". . ' r • r. i• ., .,, 4.-.II ,. -,,. -i ,;)4 ....T *'''' • ' 1 * ' I,- -A:4;.-NE .-,t- - '.„. 11." • b , 4t •11 , i : ie •-4v, - ..... ,'-t,,,,,. /.. _ . , .4%; '' . ' * '• - ' "' ' ' " kdr...k.a... ' ' / : ''''4:' '' .1. 1.‘" .-c -p,,,t,.• -.7 .,,.. ,-... - - ..„. . - si,..„:. „ _ -:.•• J. - t , J., -• •,, :,1 t• .40, , 4,1,..T e.,Veo. ,t.., '''..'iN''Ler' .2. f'' *,''}.e0::0-'• :keg ' ' .° '° ..1 1. r e74.:"'A .‘„4,1,1 $ • ° ' ' ; .:::'4. •fr -4'''. '°.4..4''.'6-74.• , . •'''. ' -t'.,. ,. - .' -,.14'.14-1i1M14ts.„rik1s,,,14,1y.v-4!44,t.I4.,,.,r...J.-,•4g•..1-.:i‘"j.,..•a,*k0,1,..4„4.;.9,,i..,,•..,t.,4..,+,7,,44t.,.*-,,,-.-,..,,....4.....'4'q'r"4:.'.,''0;'41*:':',-'*f.:.*:';,,,...',,'b..:-.,,--..."•,*,.:'-,,..'1.,,,,.,i.'.,.',;.,•.-„a,,,.,.v.!.'.e4".,,,°.,.,,.40..1.4;`..,*,;,-+.,.-„','.-'4,47,).•51•..'.-.-•")'**.•,.-.-'';„-„,.,.;,-° _ .4,,:..-;•--*,'•,.,,-2.,.„'-,..'.0.',.,.'t--....:w.-..-.-1'':"”..."4-.,:,-,.-t-.,'-"''"-_ .,...i,l1tlr--., J',"AP,i!,•`," . Mi'- . , .'1 , , .,-• vr-,•;,,,sii 4,k`,74,;If.."*4. ,.."*... *- * : . .„ -..4-,,-- ,...... ,.... . • . , tai 441, _. „,,, „,,,.,.4. i ...I 4,!it,Z o': ,,,,41.' ' V4.* - ' * , . ,_ ' -•-.'.."1 - .- ', '-. '',.. '. 7;.'-. ' -' „.. ..3,,, ° ,. , -: r„,..;,,s,"0....a.,... _ I-_......i- • „;.......,0.4 i 1 , 1 -:„.., .,. 2i: -..._,,,..440- , ' L . , - ... -.4 *§P,T*1,-.- .0...-"'•,.., , :, %.,_ . t.."3. .3- ,• , ' ., ,, ;•`” 4." ,). ...." ,,,I,....,4' • .• ' - - , .-4,..40,44..,et te-'17,41 le • ..., .. . -. •-.-" -.... 't s :....1.., -•.'...• ''' '. ' ' • . - ''''''4,;', 1r. W.:Ne. ''''' 'ipt*°' -4,0) e. e AL ' '''''.-i''*. '',..•?,„N-.,.., 4'7:, °''''''''.' ''' ..'' . -.. ' t '-4730! .On,*'4.,: ''',...4 A,e"'''''4„r or, - ......*-..' 0 '' " ::••••%•:,‘f'',V.,'id **„.,'t e., "*. ";., : 4 'e°''' '',_.''' '' '- 014:4'.10 '‘`...!6;'''''* -•. e e i,e 0,.....' :46 'w„„- '''''. 4. . '''' •tf'.0.4°4. y., - • 'PS;-;,,),,ii,- "L'1.1.''4'...11 - ''eil tf.' '0, ,-: -... ,-,..,„rt.i.,-,..... '""' I ''..:, ''',i,•,1-''••., ''' ....Nil** t ,• ' ' •• " . ''' - - ,74*(74LL,."1"%ki 14. J "is, • - - ' .. ,'..*7,',... * ''.: .. . .- .14.7r, ' 7..-'-'7'..tr.,..:.=,;,,,' ==,74- I* '• ,..'" -• - ` ' ,.... " ;z,s - ... ••. , -..* • kg),.. te..,.,j,, J.:LT.,.,... ,,,,,,,,... ••„,,, •-, I . .. 44.,7---' ,..43.e‘ ' " • 'V.,'• - ?'"+""''',. ,'V.0.1. , -' Xi?....t rf-: " . '.• .' F1 I,.',..'r. 4,* 40" iv ' . .'".gi'i..E.41.4114211.V ,, , .......w..... AT 4.,_ • • ..., ...., .irr...„.......,...„.. • .,... ,... ... , . . ..,.. .•., „, ... -... , d Additional propose \--- - - . . lc ier„. ,.. et„i,pg ,t,..„4„.• ,. k,,,,4 ,,.. '‘'' "-' '• la'..1 ..... 7.. I' 624 \ pi„ , . . 4 ,,„, 1,.. ...,--; --.. \ . ..,..)- , , 62,1-D t al ti ::*.14:,,, .' - '.i.4: it v''' • ----- , •414 ,..; 4.,' -,.,., i.,*. . . 4/„..- ..ty, .a• 41 ... , • if. 4:„.."" - . l'''.‘44711/30114W: *P4/\\,:t'^': i, ' ' " • • ,- / t,;,,,,t:0, ,,,..4. _ ,,, •• 4. ",..,,, 1,k .t. - • , ,ik..ralli ,,..,4' - ,_ 4., 4,„„,,,,,,;,, ,..,),• • vir,,-,,,,,,)-,1, •, , ..... . - v..--10' * „, -To. 1, • 1 , 1 t t 4 n*I;* .. "2 fr - ' Le -- -,„ -,..rs. 1::::,......:,,,,,7,'., • ,^ ,,,._.,. , , - z 4'7 i LIAL1 Cr"1:'' ''''1 iCli'7. '*4 - _..... . . .,,,c , , ,,,iii -",- . ., 1 . . 4 • " '.* ''''''-,,-.1;*;"•:.'11r;1,..A-i'$ *1- - Slt : is, OW.: '.-.A... gaigitialkiiik"-.154...:,..; ,,,..''. ....:,,,,,,,„. „,... . _ . 1 t . ,.. ... ,- t • _ . a, --• - * ----, ..'J 4T" *.r. -- * „,,,• , ......-...,-.....24......... -A.?•,;% iqr7 r. a, 4.1,;;;,a t 0 k,...,.,..11146110 . ..,.,,,rx.„ 1,...,1*._ W..17--, A :, 1-- .. - - ,, . 4, ...,.• ,,„h c-,e-, ' 1.10 ,1 •i it L''' I 0,*. **,, a'...' - ., 'se% •ht4 -- -. - ".... -, ,.„ '".., - .-•. ; - • :•°-° °. - i- ”::v... . • ' 14.78A0 i AO Ac PIN:awed Wm Wage ainwilth GraP"le 15 Bs Acres Total tt 1 13hotypeAneF e-OYPreto'Ca LUDtai DescriptCmCedSponem Legend T 1EM 'V it,.. ......„ .A.2 Aeria HOOVER PLANNING & ...._ N NM 0.10.00pft Crorr Pap",414... Mit*war WM Land, Environmental & Tra-- 1'724 A; ,wt Rna A Newili Suit. Cri N (..3 > m C.ri 0) C) 0 -4 0 cn 0 0 ____ a) rff 0 W - ; CO C 0 .7.: 5 —10CmCI— Q3-, I 13 CD 0) 0 CD 0G3 ET C a -2 0. M Cl- 0 — ri CD CD a C 3 V co 1 cn o 13 73 N 51 a A ,-< CD 0 c •• a 3 o = co to i \ \4\ o, c 0 s -r:3 03 G") 2: VD \-.. 0 \_. ‘” \ O.2, se to 5M > DN ,.,„-1 m 0 r_. 7 0 CI) -*- a, Cr) _ t St T \ =\- co 01 pi\ _. , 0 a ..., w a\bp 5 -., :-1 ei G. * C ••••• .-. o o 5. x .- a, 7 D) \>\c > C0 0\ "1° K a 02. crocc a CD -, E E * K 8 a g] \ c \c-7). -,::\-; 67 \ i gi i 7:1 ' 5' m . CD hi 61 a) Iv iv • to ,,, o . c `g, g " 0 g, 2 -z -:' •• 0 Ca u) CD a co i g Z a, A N gi I 3 0 I3 t i —— — — a 5. i.. . I— K c a \ \ a_ Z < c'T -. a - In 0— 11 x ). m a- 13 in x m 0-. c. a 0 ... 5 --- 1.9-. D rn fir 0 a M a 0 Z N — CC) g l"it —X O ta en 0 n 0 — En z m fil z 0 a--- gr x a cn a.0 g- E IC E. to 1 1 — (MOd 100 I-) PRAelnoe Jamoo MO b ieueo,001. 1 1 L 1 ,,,i,\I \1 ________ \I mc) > = 63 CO le •.,, a x T- 7 m In E a N.2 1 0 to 9. 5 cr, 0 • >u. a O 11. 0 5 u, •Th to c c cn C C m E z g ET i Z r.400' 1 CO .- .---- m x o iy0 v' o'al 0 , o b, m to ..—� d � c 0 mr LK c m N w c. a R.co o G) Cm 0 \nID Q N a -' O `.�\ au m O 0 \-1\10 0a 13 pq v r -� o "a;\ -tm -- \-<\° g' \and` N /3 g M g3 \z\i' °\0 m\\al pi N ;Pi T M CO p \m `-. n� Ill O c7:i \i_q\KD: L. › \r\--\\\\\ \\.\\ 0 — cr c. m in 03 co 2 x 0: G-) Q -0v( � h z Z 7 j Z b m ,.,i "'\ 0 D M CO NZ 0 h2m a< 0, � ^ q p_gn_y Ci) A m_N V1 -c7 RI � n- m-= ,,,..E.-.N_N C y H (Mold,000 PJenalnog JalpoO MOld IeueO,006 _____ _____\I c 0 23 mc o O wD A co Z C nZ D m n m D N H a w ch O N XI M m Z Qtm» D D Z yr r=400' - 1 cn 0 D 4 e`4 CD 'D M ca. g- m ,. ai.34..,- 0-0 > c. r t.-1 a r) i... 0 a ET I MC:3 CS > < 5 3_3 . = t = co = a) 4)E m g r_ 1-11 a) PJ 5 ,L a c0 .„„.. (53 q On . a) 0 . ,..., 0. -ci g-RO Li J . a 0 I = (....) g' H ga ,...1-s co 3 C4 CF2 PO F2 I :r. r..) CT i m :-.., - mo - o Di a 5': 1 7a b 0 5 0 1"0 st,"1 tri md I..• 0— co _......, OD 0 MI .l:rg (--, )7;1 t..1 0 0_4CA p....ii c3-1 g ril ... 2 m x C C', = CO o x 0 F 0 = 3 a CD 2r.§ —. C1) 03 — cg . U) CD C) iry = a r) • Ai — (7) a. r) s- -,. • . 0 rn in ta .— 0 '17"..... = a) 03 Z" q al CL g • •m., ---. • Collier Blvd.(C.R. 951)ROW. fil -,4 Z fr:-....-9 T 0 Z Q -o y --. N d r-, tri o O.a „ ' a X r '4 z 3 . „,-.- a Ci)• O 0PCJ Z P 0 CO n T(-.)/D C c CI d i 3 Z� � a aa. Z� � �sfy g U N �d a o 0, t0 g Lra Po z Ey J. I m h 5 COO 3 /a 6,6 p33 ♦may O ^ V ` 8 D 03 (J) CD a y C C) O s A ::0 6Iw. /X V n V/ LL c r O YW 0' --- mfr 4N 0 .bw -a s. {_ p co gag 0. a �- 8 g Collier Blvd.(C.R.951)R.O.W. bfi z w 1"=300' ITEM V.C.2 LISTED PLANT & ANIMAL SUMMARY TABLE Catalina Plaza No listed species have been observed on the Catalina Plaza property and due to the high level of human activity no listed species are expected. The various listed species which may occur in the FLUCCS communities found on this parcel are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Potential protected species listed according to FLUCCS category. FLUCCS Potential Listed Species Scientific Name Designated Status FWC or FDA FWS 211 Florida Panther Felis concolor coryi E E Florida Sandhill Crane Grus canadensis pratensis T - 624- American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis SSC T(S/A) Drained- Everglades Mink Mustela vison evergladensis T Grapevine Florida Black Bear Ursus americanus floridanus T - Florida Panther Felis concolor coryi E E Gopher Frog Rana capito SSC - Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea SSC - Snowy Egret Egretta thula SSC - Limpkin Aramus guarauna SSC - Tricolored Heron Egretta tricolor SSC - Wood Stork Mycteria americana E E Abbreviations: Agencies FWC=Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FDA=Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services FWS=United States Fish and Wildlife Service Status E=Endangered T=Threatened T(S/A)=Threatened/Sirnilarity of Appearance SSC—Species of Special Concern 1-E M V.C.3 p.01��i 050 245 6439 RPR-13`77 i 15=45 FL MASTER S 1 CE FILE - saganovilliMilivikpRROC ' --_ Ui+'loun ccactet i - ' -- - �i�Yb of Adn� � �• �_' i., v �`t_-rte FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OP HISTORICAL RSOURCB9 April'7,2003 Mr.3e:remy Stark Hooves Fl gN�Development. Ina. 3785 AirportloS n Napita,FL 34105 Fu:0414180672 Dear Mr.Stena usi reoardad In response to y of April 7*,2003,that Florida Master Site File lists no previously cultural resource;in the following Hwa: T43S,R26E,Sado*34 . In interpreting the results of our search,please remember the following points: such an yours,may ontairn unrecorded • Areas which have not been completely�` c stsuctw�es,or both.archaeological sites,=recorded historically importan As you may know,state and federal laws require formal environmental review for some n • projects. Record saran by the-staff of the Florida Master Site Tule do notes such a review of cultural retotirces. If your thef Bateau of under����`�os't 850- hould contao:tthe Compliance Review Section 245.6333 or at this address, Sincerely, BrWL 41/14/1 Stir Duncan,850-245.6440 Data Analyst,Florida Master Site File State ; 205.6440 Division of Historical Resources Fou lice: B56-245-6439 500 A.Gray Budding Erna�de@m4fl dos statefLus Tal South Bronough Street Web: hrtp:Myww.dos.sratta ibaii hrhneff Tallahassee,Florida 323990250 DIRECTOR'S ONCE LA Gray Building - 500 South Hlronough Street ' Tallahassee,Florida 323940250 ' (650)03-1480 PAX:(550)4888353 • WWW Address ktri w,dus t�. O HISTORICAL MUSEUMS ARCHtAEOLOOICAL RESEARCH El HISTORIC PRESERVATION I`.1 PI..+—+-r•--!l.r. +wL/w—w/A...44+..M.+rM'..4w •� •""' TOTAL P.01 f"1 Item V.D.4 MARKETING ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD/COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT BY ADDING THE CATALINA PLAZA OFFICE PARK AND SPECIALTY RETAIL CENTER TO THE SUBDISTRICT LOCATED ON VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD NAPLES, FLORIDA PREPARED BY: NICOLA WESTON AND WILLIAM L.HOOVER, AICP HOOVER PLANNING &DEV., INC. 3785 AIRPORT ROAD NORTH, SUITE B-1 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105 DATE PREPARED: APRIL 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 2 PURPOSE AND FOCUS 4 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 5 TRADE AREA ANALYSIS . . 5 DEMOGRAPHICS OF TRADE AREA 7 TRADE AREA POPULATION GROWTH . 8 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY INVENTORY 9 COMMERCIAL RETAIL DEMAND 10 CONCLUSIONS 16 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The subject property is located on 15.88 acres of land, on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road. The site has about ''A mile of frontage along Vanderbilt Beach Road and its eastern boundary is located about 1/4 mile and its western boundary about 'h mile west of the signalized intersection between Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard. The subject property is proposed for an upscale office park/specialty retail center with a maximum size of 150,000 square feet. If the site is approved for both a Plan Amendment and PUD Rezoning permitting the requesting uses construction should commence in late 2004. An environmental analysis shows the site to have very minimal on-site environmental issues. This site is located in the northeast corner of the Naples urban area where potential competitive sites are limited due to the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. The site's trade boundaries are I-75 to the west, Irnmokalee Road and Randall Boulevard to the north,just beyond DeSoto Boulevard to the east, and approximately to Green Boulevard to the south. The growth rates within the project's trade area, especially in the vicinity of the project, demonstrate why the Naples Metropolitan Area has consistently been in the top 10 metropolitan areas in the U.S. as far as population growth. Based on statistics from the Collier County Long Range Planning Section and the U.S. Census Bureau, the trade area had a population of 15,381 in 254/4 1995 and 64,933-in 2000. Based on the growth rates from 1995 to 2000, population in the trade area was projected to be 31,467 in 2003, 35,847 in 2005, 46,080 in 2010, and 51,933 in 2013 Based on the marketing analyses there is a major demand for and a substantial shortage of retail within this trade area. In the 2003 analysis, marketing demand was projected at 255 acres of retail development. Since the supply was estimated at only 59 acres, a shortage was projected of 196 acres. In 2005, the demand was 310 acres, the supply 148 acres and a shortage of 162 acres. In 2010, the demand was 467 acres, the supply 214 acres and a shortage of 253 acres. In 2010, 2 the demand was 583 acres, the supply 240 acres and a shortage of 343 acres. The subject site seems to be ideal for the location of some additional retail and office space due to its location. 3 PURPOSE AND FOCUS The intention of this marketing study is to provide an analysis regarding the proposed expansion of the existing Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict. The existing Subdistrict is located at the northwest corner of the signalized intersection between Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard (see Vicinity Map). The eastern boundary of the proposed expansion area abuts a portion of the western boundary of the existing 33.45-acre Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict (hereinafter "Existing Subdistrict"). The proposed expansion area (or "subject site") is 15.88 acres in area and is currently a cow pasture. It is under conditional purchase contract by the applicant. The expansion area has 1320 feet of frontage along Vanderbilt Beach Road and about 525 feet of depth. The Collier County Comprehensive Plan currently designates the expansion area as being within the Urban Residential Subdistrict, which is part of the Urban - Mixed Use District. The expansion area is proposed for commercial uses, via a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, that would reclassify the subject land as also being within the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment would limit the maximum commercial gross leasing area on the expansion area to 150,000 square feet. Upon final approval and adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the land would need to be rezoned for commercial uses by a PUD Rezoning. Prior to construction, a formal Site Development Plan or plat would also have to be approved through Collier County Development Services and applicable permits would have to be obtained through numerous permitting agencies. Since the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process should be completed by late March 2004 and the PUD Rezoning petition would be submitted in about January 2004, the 2 public hearing processes should be completed by July 2004. The remaining developmental processes are expected to be completed by late 2004. 4 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY Recently environmentalist Jeremy Sterk, of Hoover Planning & Development, Inc., prepared a Florida Land Use Cover Classification System (FLUCCS) map and Protected Species Survey on the subject site. It shows all of the subject site being uplands and the site being predominantly cow pasture. The Protected Species Survey advises there were no protected species observed on-site. TRADE AREA ANALYSIS "Trade area" is considered to be the market area that will support a project. Trade areas vary based on: type of subject commercial project, the location and makeup of competing commercial projects in the vicinity, composition of residential properties in the vicinity, and traffic network in the vicinity of the project. A community's comprehensive plan and zoning patterns can also substantially affect trade areas. There are several types of trade areas: primary trade area, secondary trade area, and --� tertiary area. The primary trade area is the geographical area from which a project will normally generate 70% to 80% of its business. The secondary trade area normally provides an additional 15%to 20% of a project's business. A commercial project will derive the remaining 5%to 10% of its business from its tertiary trade area. Typically this is a more distant geographical area, which will attract customers due to something "unique" or something "better" at the subject site. The land uses of the proposed project will significantly influence the size and layout of the primary trade area. The anticipated trade area for the subject project is shown on the next page (see Project's Trade Area). Initially, the trade area seems out of proportion, since it extends much further to the east and southeast from the subject site than in the other directions. Several key factors formulate the trade area boundaries for this project, including: 1) There is a very limited arterial/collector 5 roadway network in the rural portion of Collier County, located east of Collier Boulevard, north of 1-75, and south of Immokalee Road (referred to as the Rural Estates). Golden Crate Boulevard is the main arterial roadway leading from the heart of the Rural Estates into Naples and it ends at Collier Boulevard. Traffic going to Naples then heads 1 mile to the north or south and uses either Vanderbilt Beach Road or Pine Ridge Road for the rest of their commute. 2) Except for commercial centers along 1-75 and along Collier Boulevard there are few opportunities for commercial centers within this trade center. The commercial centers along I-75 and the one at the southwest corner of Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard are all located at the perimeter of the trade area along either its northern or western boundary, which makes those commercial sites inconvenient for many of the residents in this trade area. Key competing commercial centers to the Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict are the following driving distances from the subject site: a) Two miles north at the intersection between Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard. b) Five miles northwest at the Interstate 75 - Immokalee Road Interchange, that is partly out of this trade area. c) Five miles west at the intersection between Airport Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road, that is actually 2 miles outside the trade area. d) Five miles southwest at the Interstate 75 Pine Ridge Road Interchange, that is again partly out of this trade area. e) Two miles south on the western half of the intersection between Collier Boulevard and Pine Ridge Road f) The neighborhood centers along Golden Gate Boulevard (at its intersection with Wilson Boulevard and Everglades Boulevard but only 2 of the 8 quadrants have been approved for commercial uses at this time). g) A proposed 5.14-acre office park across Vanderbilt Beach Road at the southwest corner of the intersection with Collier Boulevard. Essentially, this trade area is located within 2 planning communities and 6 census tracts (refer to Project's Trade Area). The portion of the trade area within the Urban Estates Planning Community is basically located west of the subject site and portion of the trade area within the 6 Rural Estates Planning Community east of the subject site. To more accurately analyze and discuss this trade area, the trade area was further broken down along census tract boundaries into 6 study districts. Two of the six study districts were within the Urban Estates Planning Community were labeled the Central Urban Estates and the South Urban Estates study districts. Four of the study districts were within the Rural Estates Planning Community and were relabeled the Southwest Rural Estates, the North Central Rural Estates, the Northeast Rural Estates, and the Southeast Rural Estates. DEMOGRAPHICS OF TRADE AREA Demographics of a trade area are excellent indicators of demand for retail products. Population and income statistics within the trade area were the key factors utilized in projecting retail demand. The population statistics for the trade area were determined in the following manner. Each of the 6 study districts was typically comprised of traffic analysis zones that dwelling unit statistics were available for, see "Breakdown of Trade Area By Study Districts & Traffic Analysis Zones". In about several instances the boundaries of the study districts did not perfectly conform with the boundaries of a particular TAZ, so we reviewed more specific data from the Property Appraiser's office or Feasinomics, Inc. to estimate the number of dwelling units within each study district. The exhibit entitled "Dwelling Units in Trade Area" shows the number of dwelling units within the applicable traffic analysis zones for 1995 and 2000. This exhibit additionally shows the increase in dwelling units over the five-year period from 1995 to 2000 for each of the 6 study districts. The population for each of the 6 trade districts was calculated by multiplying the dwelling units by the average population per household, which were obtained by Census Tract, U.S. Census Bureau, 2000. The population of each study district was projected to increase throughout the future projected time frames by the same increase rate as those shown on the exhibit labeled "Annual 7 Population Increase". The 2003, 2005, 2010, and 2013 population projections are each shown on the attached individual exhibits. TRADE AREA POPULATION GROWTH The exhibit labeled "5-Year Population and Percentage Increase" for all of the study districts within the trade area demonstrates why Collier County has consistently been ranked in the top 10 fastest growing metropolitan areas in the United States for the last 15 years. The study districts averaged a 67% increase in population between 1995 and 2000. Overall the trade area shows an annual increase in of 2047 persons. Exclusive of approximately V2 of the Central Urban Estates and the western and northern area of the North Central Rural Estates, the study districts are true estate areas that are typically comprised of single-family homes developed at a density of less than 1 home per acre. About one-half of the Central Urban Estates and the most westerly mile of the North Central Rural Estates are typical urban areas where the Collier County Comprehensive Plan normally permits densities between 4 to 7 units per acre. The north central portion of the North Central Rural Estates is proposed as a rural receiving area for a transfer of density rights from other rural lands that are typically located in more environmentally sensitive areas. The Central Urban Estates area, located north of Vanderbilt Beach Road, and the urban portion of the North Central Rural Estates (area just east of Collier Boulevard) should be major growth areas in the next 5 to 10 years based on a large number of residential PUD Rezoning applications that have been submitted over the past 5 years. Many of these residential projects are still in the development review stages. The Rural Estates study districts should continue to flourish due to their plentiful supply of reasonably priced single-family estate home sites and the recent 4-laning of Golden Gate Boulevard, which is the areas key commuting route to Naples. As demonstrated in the individual 8 exhibits, the trade area's population is projected to increase from 31,467 in 2003 to 51,933 in 2013. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY INVENTORY Key to any marketing analysis is a review of existing and potential commercial sites within the project's trade area. Within the urban area commercial land uses are restricted by the Collier County Comprehensive Plan to locate within primarily Commercial Activity Centers. Within the project's trade area is the southern half of the Activity Center, located at Immokalee Road and Collier l3oulevard. The southwest quadrant of this Activity Center is currently open (#1 on the map exhibit entitled "Commercial Office/Retail Property Inventory" and a table entitled "Commercial Office/Retail Property Inventory"). This center is about 2 miles north of the subject site and includes a Publix-anchored shopping center and a free-standing Walgreens. Additionally, there are 2 Interchange Activity Centers located along 1-75 along the western and northwestern boundaries of the project's trade area. Three commercial projects are proposed at the southeast quadrant of the Immokalee Road/Interstate 75 Activity Center (#2, #3 & #4 on the map and table). Six acres of the Crestwood PUD (#3) are approved for industrial uses and were excluded from the inventory. The Pine Ridge Road/Interstate Activity Center already has a shopping center in the northeast quadrant (#20 on the map and table) with a Publix and Ben Franklin as the anchor tenants. The southeast quadrant of this Interchange Activity Center has some medical offices open (#19). An additional commercial project in the southeast quadrant of the interchange has been approved and we believe is intended for further medical offices (#18). Finally just east and northeast of the subject site, there is an approved Albertson's shopping center (#8) that is expected to be developed nearly exclusively for retail uses and a proposed business park(#9) with up to 30% of its area for retail and offices uses. 9 The other centers shown on the Commercial Office\Retail Property Inventory exhibits are primarily governed by the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and include: 7.38 acres (#.5 & #6) of existing convenience-oriented commercial land uses, located about 9 driving miles to the northeast at the Immokalee Road/Randle Boulevard intersection. There are both existing and proposed commercial uses at the intersection of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard (#10, #11 & #12) and at the intersection of Pine Ridge Road\Collier Boulevard (#15 & #16). A small office project is proposed in the southwest corner of the intersection between Vanderbilt Beach Road & Collier Boulevard (#14). The Sungate Center is an existing commercial project at the northwest corner of the intersection of Green Boulevard and Collier Boulevard (#17) COMMERCIAL RETAIL DEMAND A market support analysis was utilized to project retail demand. This section analyzed the total income level and expendable income in the subject trade area. By determining the income and expenditures in a given area,the retail sales potential of that area was projected. The following pages show projections of market support for retail commercial space in the subject trade area. They are based on projected population and retail sales potential. The data cover 4 time frames; .2003 (current), 2005, 2010 and 2013. Demand for retail space is based on population projections and the annual projected retail expenditures for all persons within the trade area. To project market demand the following methodology was used. The projected population for each of the 6 study districts was multiplied by the estimated per capita income of that study district or census tract to reveal its total income. The 2000 Florida Statistical Abstract indicates an average 6% annual growth factor for Collier County per capita income in the previous 5 years. This 6% figure was utilized to project future annual increase in per capita income for each study district. Source:FLA Statistical %of Increase Income Per Capita Collier County 1994-1995 $ 32,123 $ 32,838 2.21859344% 1995-1996 $ 32,836 $ 35,001 6.59337313% 1996-1997 $ 35,001 $ 36,210 3.45418702% 1997-1998 $ 36,210 $ 41,913 15.7497929% 1998-1999 $ 41,913 $ 42,813 2.14730513% Average Annual Increase 6.0328503% Source:Florida Statistical Abstract,1993,1999,2000 The total income was multiplied by a ratio of .4411 to determine the total retail expenditure of permanent residents. If we divide the total retail expenditure for permanent residents by.8857, the result will be the total retail expenditure for permanent and seasonal residents(all residents). The total retail expenditure for all residents was divided by the average sales per square foot factor, which was determined to be $220.87 for 1995 by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section. This figure was increased annually by 2.3% to reflect expected inflation throughout the study time frames. This revealed the supportable retail square footage. To determine the supportable retail commercial acreage, the supportable square footage was divided by .1867, the floor area ratio for the planning communities, and then divided by 43,560 square feet per acre. Current and future demands were projected for retail commercial space based on projected income and expenditures or market support. Tables with detailed analyses are shown on the following pages. n 11 Demand 2003 3447. L. E Lv)* 11,173 X PER CAPITA INCOME $45.133 TOTAL INCOME $504,271,009 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $222,433,942 4.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $251,139,147 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE((g$263.26) $953,958.62 SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $1,001,656.55 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 123.16 ACRES 7;44 Siit: ryr— WIT 7 1,914 X PER CAPITA INCOME $35,120 TOTAL INCOME $67,219,680 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $29,650,601 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $33,477,025 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$263.26) $127,163.35 SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $133,521.52 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 16.42 ACRES g0itt-11 P .1cffilq) 1,7fi.1Wgr 7,190 X PER CAPITA INCOME $28269 TOTAL INCOME $203,254,110 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $89,655,388 /(,3857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $101,225.458 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$263.26) $384,507.55 SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $403,732,93 SF. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 49.64 ACRES 'TWO-re Tik5Ft44' 11043WIt:. 1--"11%51:33W.-,..7'"7":7: 2,197 X PER CAPITA INCOME $21.61$ TOTAL INCOME 647,494,746 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $20,949,932 4.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $23,853,531 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$263.26) $89,848.56 SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $94,340.98 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 11.60 ACRES 1,794 X PER CAPITA INCOME $2L684 TOTAL INCOME $38,901,096 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $17,159,273 f(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $19,373,686 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$263.26) $73,591.45 SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT. WITH 5%VACANCY $77,271.02 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 9.50 ACRES • •14t, IP) g 11.7 "..4W 7,200 X PER CAPITA INCOME $25.39 TOTAL INCOME $182,800,800 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $80,833,433 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $91,039,215 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$26326) $345,814.84 SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $363,105.58 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 44.65 ACRES SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL ACREAGE WITHIN TRADE AREA 254.98 ACRES total income $1,043,941,441 Demand 2005 7: ;" a . - Y � 12,822 X PER CAPITA INCOME $50.549 TOTAL INCOME $648,139,278 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS 5285,894,236 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $322,789,021 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$275.37) $1,172,201.11 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $1,230,811.17 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 151.34 ACRES i777.145tffirtkitiKitififfitiMiTiatraffilitinT ! 2,004 X PER CAPITA INCOME 539.334 TOTAL INCOME $78,825,336 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $34,769,856 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $39,256,922 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$275.37) $142,560.63 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $149,688.67 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 18.41 ACRES - 1 'rP A'Itf1 'A ' .. 8,185 X PER CAPITA INCOME $31,662 TOTAL INCOME 5259,153,470 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $114,312,596 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $129,064,690 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$275.37) $468,695.54 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $492,130.31 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 60.51 ACRES 1 ' R�L1176i iiri 2,887 X PER CAPITA INCOME $24,212 TOTAL INCOME $69,900,044 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $30,832,909 /(8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $34,811,911 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$275.37) $126,418.68 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $132,739.61 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 16.32 ACRES -7-77§ t rant t1# 'f t APIA: 2,057 X PER CAPITA INCOME 524.286 TOTAL INCOME $49,956,302 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $22,035,725 1(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $24,879,445 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$275.37) $90,349.15 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $94,866.61 S.F. SUPPORTABI P COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 11,66 ACRES "ii . 7,891 X PER CAPITA INCOME $28.435 TOTAL INCOME $224,380,585 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $98,974,276 1(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $111,746,953 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$275.37) $405,806.56 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $426,096.89 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 52.39 ACRES SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE WITHIN TRADE AREA 310.64 ACRES total income $1,330,355,015 Demand 2010 �rf� .�. ►. • t 16,944 X PER CAPITA INCOME 365.713 TOTAL INCOME $1,113,441,072 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $491,138,857 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $554,520,556 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE((%$307.04) $1,806,020.57 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY 51.896,321.60 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 233.17 ACRES t t 4 �)'x1a41t a ;' 1fON,'91 YTtRr DTI 2,229 X PER CAPITA INCOME $51353 TOTAL INCOME $114,465,837 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $50,490,881 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $57,006,753 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE((rte 5307.04) 5185,665.56 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY 3194,948.83 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMEkCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 23.97 ACRES 10,673 X PER CAPITA INCOME $41460 TOTAL INCOME $439,300,680 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $193,775,530 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $218,782,353 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@,5307.04) 5712,553.26 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $748,180.92 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 92.00 ACRES r ., I1lAi .aaJ R r� sus phae 3,899 X PER CAPITA INCOME $3L475 TOTAL INCOME $122,721,025 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $54,132,244 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $61,118,036 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE((§$307.04) $199,055.61 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY 5209,008.39 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 25.70 ACRES Ctrinazi 2:,716 X PER CAPITA INCOME $31.572 TOTAL INCOME $85,749,552 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $37,824,127 /(:8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $42,705,349 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE((rte 5307.04) $139,087.25 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $146,041.61 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 17.96 ACRES 9,619 X PER CAPITA INCOME 536.966 TOTAL INCOME $355,575,954 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $156,844,553 4.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $177,085,416 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(41..5307.04) $576,750.31 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $605,587.83 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 74.46 ACRES 4 .gal /4Q'10W � SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE WITHIN TRADE AREA 467.26 ACRES total income $2,231,254,120 Demand 2013 _- X e ' 111 °b 9F i 19,416 X PER CAPITA INCOME $77.541 TOTAL INCOME $1,505,536,056 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $664,091,954 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $749,793,332 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$328.22) $2,284,423.05 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $2,398,644.20 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 294.94 ACRES tI; TA7 ? �° :€s irx.r5P7, 2,364 X PER CAPITA INCOME ¶60.339 TOTAL INCOME $142,641,396 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $62,919,120 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $71,038,862 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$328.22) $216,436.72 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $227,258.56 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 27.94 ACRES 't' `x,•AblitM 'I< 1z C() +�, A '` 12,166 X PER CAPITA INCOME $48.569 TOTAL INCOME $590,890,454 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $260,641,779 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $294,277,723 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$328.22) $896,586.81 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $941,416.15 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 115.76 ACRES 4,220 X PER CAPITA INCOME $37,141 TOTAL INCOME $156,735,020 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $69,135,817 I(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $78,057,827 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$328.22) $237,821.67 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $249,712.75 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 30.70 ACRES 7411 f.'`:. '13L;1%;I `.'`�f_,_= 3,110 X PER CAPITA INCOME $37255 TOTAL INCOME $115,863,050 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $51,107,191 /(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $57,702,598 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$328.22) $175,804.64 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $184,594.87 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 22.70 ACRES !y_a�#:i. y 1161 : r P ,110 ': 13P' 10,656 X PER CAPITA INCOME $43.620 TOTAL INCOME $464,814,720 X(.4411) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-PERMANENT RESIDENTS $205,029,773 I(.8857) RETAIL EXPENDITURES-ALL RESIDENTS $231,488,961 SUPPORTABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE(@$328.22) $705,285.97 S.F. SUPPORTABLE SQ.FT.WITH 5%VACANCY $740,550.27 S.F. SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE(FAR=.1867) 91.06 ACRES SUPPORTABLE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE WITHIN TRADE AREA 583.10 ACRES total income $2,976,480,696 CONCLUSIONS: Based on the marketing analyses there is currently and will be substantial future demand for retail and office space within this trade area. In the 2003 analysis, there is a projected marketing demand of approximately 255 acres of retail development. The commercial inventory schedule for 2003 indicates a supply of only 59 acres, resulting in a shortage of 196 acres. In the 2005 study, the total personal income would continue to increase, supporting commercial retail acreage of over 310 acres. The commercial inventory schedule for 2005 indicates a projected total of 148 acres developed for retail and office uses, resulting in a shortage of 162 acres. In the analysis for 2010, the retail demand would be to over 467 acres. The commercial inventory schedule for 2010 projects 214 acres of retail/office development, leaving a shortage of 253 acres. In the analysis for 2013, the retail demand should increase to over 583 acres. The commercial inventory schedule for 2013 projects a total of 240 acres developable for retail and office space, still leaving a shortage of 343 acres of land needed for retail and office space. The subject site seems to be ideal for the location of some additional retail and office space due to its location. It is within 1 mile of where Golden Gate Boulevard dead ends into Collier Boulevard forcing commuters from the Rural Estates to either travel north one mile to Vanderbilt Beach Road or south one mile to Pine Ridge Road to complete their commute. Additionally, the latest AUIR budgets $13,000,000 for right-of-way purchases in FY 2007 for the extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road all the way to Wilson Boulevard. This will make Vanderbilt Beach Road another major roadway into the Rural Estates. 16 This report was prepared by: *(A--41,174- William L. Hoover,AICP Nicola J.Weston,Marketing Coordinator Hoover Planning and Dev. Hoover Planning and Dev. 17 Item V.E. 1 .C. HOOVER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, INC. \Q Rezonings, PUDs, Conditional Uses, Variances, Plan Amendments, Traffic, Parking, & Land Use Studies, Site Planning & Subdivisions =�I April 24,2003 RE: Major Traffic Impact Study for Catalina Plaza to Allow 15.88 Acres of Commercial Land Uses,Located in Sec.34,Twp.48S,Rng.26E,in Unincorporated Collier County,Florida INTRODUCTION The subject property is 15.8 acres and is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road and west of Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951). The site has about 'A mile of frontage along Vanderbilt Beach Road, with its eastern boundary located about % mile west of Collier Boulevard and its western boundary located about %mile west of Collier Boulevard. The site is currently zoned Agricultural and is being utilized as cow pasture. The subject property is proposed for inclusion within the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Subdistrict, via a Plan Amendment and PUD Rezoning petitions. The gross floor area on the subject 15.88 acres would be a maximum of 150,000 square feet. The Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Subdistrict currently comprises the 33.45-acre Mission Hills PUD,that is approved for up to 200,000 square feet of retail uses. The Mission Hills PUD is being developed as a neighborhood shopping center with an Albertsons' grocery as the anchor tenant, adjacent smaller retail spaces, and about 7-9 out-parcels. The proposed Catalina Plaza is intended to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. Land uses are envisioned as medical and professional offices, banks, restaurants, and a variety of retail uses. Specifically excluded on the subject property will be: gas stations, convenience stores with gas pumps,tire stores,and fast food restaurants with a drive-thru. These more intensive land uses generate a high volume of traffic, are better oriented with the Mission Hills PUD, and are not conducive to the upscale pedestrian-friendly environment we intend to create. The Mission Hills PUD has been designed to allow convenient cross-accesses to residential properties north of Vanderbilt Beach Road and west of Collier Boulevard and this project is intended to continue that planning strategy. TRIP GENERATION The ITE's 6th Edition of Trip Generation was utilized to estimate the number of trips for the proposed land uses. Category "Office Park (750)" was utilized to estimate traffic for most of the project's floor area (with 60% or 90,000 square feet designated as office park). The ITE advises on page 1134 of Trip Generation, "Office Parks are usually suburban subdivisions or planned unit developments containing general office buildings and support services such as banks, savings and loan institutions, restaurants, and service stations, arranged in a park- or campus-like atmosphere." Since many retail and commercial uses are not included in the Office Park (750) classification, the remaining 40% of the project's floor area was determined differently. Category "Shopping Center (820)" was used to estimate the remaining 60,000 square feet of retail and commercial uses based on gross leasing area. 3785 Airport Road North, Suite B-1, Naples, Florida 34105 • Phone: 239-403-8899 • Fax:239-403-9009 OFFICE PARK(750)-90,000 Sq. Ft. (Based on 1,000 Sq. Ft. Gross Floor Areal Formula=Number of Trips per Time Period Enter(%)/Exit(%) — e.• , t • — : , . • to, _: rY•—. _. . , t — t - • ... •. , ' c.. 1490,99,44,t2.20.1444 T— 1.213(x)+ 106.215—215 Weekday PM Peak Hour 30(14%)/185(86%) OFFICE PARK(750) -90,000 Sq. Ft. (Based on 1,000 Sq. Ft. Gross Floor Area) _ Formula=Number of Trips per Time Period Enter(%)/Exit(%) Ave.Rate= 11.42 x 90= 1028 Weekday Daily Trips 514(50%)/514(50%) Ave.Rate= 1.74 x 90= 157 Weekday AM Peak Hour. 140(89%)/17(11%) Ave.Rate= 1.50 x 90=135 Weekday PM Peak Hour 19(14%)/116(86%) SHOPPING CENTER (820) - 60,000 Sq. Ft. (Based on 1,000 Sq.Ft. G.L.A.) Formula=Number of Trips per Time Period Enter(%)/Exit(%) Ln(T)—.643 Ln(x)+5.866—4908 Weekday Daily Trips 2451(50%)/2454(50%) —. •- .. • — • _I• . . . . o• .0 . _. YY : I.: , ► • • -!► . :0 , a 0 SHOPPING CENTER (820) -60,000 Sq. Ft. (Based on 1,000 Sq. Ft. G.L.A) Formula=Number of Trips per Time Period Enter(%)!Exit(%) Ave. Rate=42.92 x 60=2576 Weekday Daily Trips 1288(50%)/1288(50%) Ave. Rate= 1.03 x 60=62 Wkdy. AM PK HR of Adj. St. 38(61%)/24(39%) Ave. Rate=3.74 x 60=224 Wkdy.PM PK HR of Adj. St. 108(48%)/116(52%) In my opinion, the computations from the above "Fitted Curve Equations" were not utilized as they were substantially distorted. Since an argument might possibly be made tient the above computations were not distorted regarding the "Fitted Curve Equations", no adjustments for the Office Park computations were made for multi-use development, as described in Chapter 7 of the ITE's Trip Generation Handbook, nor were adjustments made for the Shopping Center computations regarding multi-use development or pass-by traffic,as described in Chapter 5 of the ITE's Trip Generation Handbook. Additionally,it can be argued that the shopping center calculations were overstated for the retail uses of the subject project, as the petitioner has specifically excluded 4 high traffic generation uses (see Introduction), whose uses are typically included with many shopping centers and the computations for Shopping Center(820)classification. PROJECT'S TOTAL TRAFFIC TOTAL PROJECT FOR 150,000 Sq. Ft. Total Trips for Office Park&Shopping Center Enter(%)/Exit(%) 1028 +2576=3604 Weekday Daily Trips 1802(50%)/1802(50%) 157+62=219 Weekday. AM Peak Hour 178/41 135 +224=359 Weekday PM Peak Hour 127/232 2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The project's trips were assigned and distributed based on total dwelling unitcounts within the six study districts that comprise the project's trade area or marketing area. A map showing the marketing area for the project and the trip assignment for each study district is shown on Exhibit 2. The trade area was projected to extend to Immokalee Road to the north, Interstate 75 to the west, Green Boulevard to the south and to just beyond DeSoto Boulevard to the east. The trade area extends further to the east and southeast due to the scarcity of commercial uses in the Golden Gate Estates and the limited road network within Golden Gate Estates. To determine the number of dwelling units within each of the six study districts the following methodology was utilized. First, the TAZ numbers within the trade area were put on a_column in numerical order (see Appendix) and the increase between the 1995 and the 2000 dwelling unit counts were determined for each TAZ. In about 3 instances the boundaries of the study districts did not perfectly match the boundaries of a particular TAZ so we reviewed more specific data from the Property Appraiser's office or from Feasinomics, Inc. to determine the applicable dwelling units within each study district. After utilizing the 5-year increase to project the number of dwelling units within each TAZ for 2005 (when the subject project will start having a traffic impact), the total dwelling units from all the TAZ for each study district were totaled. After totaling all of the dwelling units within each of the 6 study districts(trade area),ratios for the number of dwelling units within each study district compared to those for the trade area were computed for each of the six study districts. These ratios for each of the 6 study districts were rounded to the nearest full percentage point. Finally,the traffic for each of the study districts were assigned to the County's major road network based on dwelling units already constructed, units expected to be developed by 2005, and units most likely within each study district to utilize the subject project. The trip assignments are also shown on Exhibit 2. The project's cumulative trip distribution was then determined by having the traffic utilize the most likely route to and from the site (see Exhibit 3). Due to the loop road running around the previously approved Mission Hills (shopping center) PUD and the nearby intersection between Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, the project's traffic for entering movements varied slightly from its exiting movements in close vicinity to the project site. The trip distribution for the project's turning movements in close vicinity to its subject site are shown on Exhibit 5 and Exhibit 6. PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS This traffic study has incorporated planned roadway improvements from the latest AUIR through FY 2007 and these are shown on Exhibit 7. Based on recent discussions with Collier County Transportation key staff members, the following key improvements are planned for Collier Boulevard and Vanderbilt Beach Road, within the project's RDI. Collier Boulevard, between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road, will commence construction for widening in January to February 2004 3 and this will be a 1-year to 14-month project. This project is designated a "fast-track" and Collier Boulevard will be widened to 4 lanes, between Golden Gate Boulevard and Vanderbilt Beach Road, and to 6 lanes, between Immokalee Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road. Additionally, Collier Boulevard will be widened to 6 lanes through the Vanderbilt Beach Road intersection and for the next 600 feet south of such intersection. Vanderbilt Beach Road is scheduled to be widened to 6 lanes between, Collier Boulevard and Airport Road, with construction commencing in November 2003. Vanderbilt Beach Road is scheduled to be widened to 6 lanes in 3 separate 1-year projects. November 2003 to November 2004 is the widening between Airport Road and Livingston Road, November 2004 to November 2005 is the widening between Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard, and November 2005 to November 2006 is the widening between Logan Boulevard to Collier Boulevard. The first portion of the Collier Boulevard widening project will he to make the intersection improvements at Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard. RADIUS OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT Exhibit 8 shows the greater of the project's A.M. or P.M. Peak trips for and what that ratio is versus the applicable roadway segment's LOS C traffic at Peak Hour. The RDI was based upon the County's determination that the RDI for a proposed commercial PUD Rezoning is any arterial roadway within 5 miles where the project's trips exceed 1% of LOS C for that roadway segment. EXISTING TRAFFIC(2003) For the existing 2003 traffic, the 2002 annual counts were obtained from the Collier County Transportation staff. The 2002 traffic figures were increased by 108%to project the 2003 existing traffic on all roadway segments. Peak Season Daily Traffic figures(see Exhibit 9) were based on the Peak/Annual Ratios shown in the County's 2001 traffic counts, as these were not provided with the 2002 annual counts. The Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and Peak Season Daily Traffic (PSDT) for each roadway segment within the project's RDI and that roadway segment's LOS for each is shown for 2003 on Exhibit 10. All arterial roadways within the project's RDI are currently at an acceptable LOS during PSDT except for segments on Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard, that are scheduled for the commencement for construction of widening in the next 10 months as previously described. FUTURE TRAFFIC The 2003 existing traffic figures were increased annually by 108%to reflect future traffic on all roadway segments throughout the project's build-out schedule. One key adjustment was made when projecting the 2004 traffic conditions. Since Livingston Road, between lmmokalee Road and Radio Road,is planned on being opened as at least a 4-lane arterial roadway it's opening will have significant impacts on north-south arterial roadways within the project's study area. For this traffic study in 2004, Collier Boulevard's traffic was increased by the 108%annual growth factor but then an estimated 4 10% of its traffic was expected to be lost to Livingston Road. Likewise in 2004, Logan Boulevard's traffic was increased as previously mentioned and then 15%of its traffic was expected to be lost to Livingston Road. No further adjustments were made beyond 2004 in regards to the opening of Livingston Road. Exhibit 11 shows the Peak Season Daily Traffic in 2005, both with and without 50% of the project's total traffic. Since construction will not commence prior to late 2004,it will likely `be late 2005 before a significant number of buildings will be completed and occupied. Hence Exhibit 11, shows the PSDT in late 2005 with 50% of the project's traffic impacting roadways within its RDI. All roadways within the project's radius of development impact will be either at LOS B or LOS C. Additionally, 50% of the project's traffic at such time will not lower the LOS on any roadway within its radius of develepmentimpact. Exhibit 12 depicts the Peak Season Daily Traffic in late 2006, both with and without 100% of the estimated traffic for the project. All roadways within the project's radius of development impact will be at LOS B or LOS C. Additionally, the project's total traffic in late 2006 will not lower the LOS on any roadway within its radius of development impact. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSES Signalized Analyses at the Intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard Exhibits 13 and 14 were prepared to assist in the project's traffic movements at this intersection. Exhibit 13 shows the project's traffic movements at the AM Peak Hour and Exhibit 14 at the PM Peak Hour. These 2 exhibits were based on the trip distribution figures shown on Exhibits 4 and 5. The intersection analyses were performed using HCS 2000 software. Intersection counts were manually taken at the subject intersection on March 4, 2002, during the-P.M. Peak Hour(see Exhibit 15). Since the counts were taken in prime season they were considered Peak Season counts. The 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM time frame was determined to be the PM Peak Hour. To project future traffic these traffic counts were increased annually by 8%. In 2003 for existing traffic, during the PM Peak Hour for Peak Season the intersection was at LOS D, with an average intersection delay of 47.5 seconds per vehicles, as shown on Exhibit 16. To reflect the opening of the Livingston Road Corridor in 2004, Collier Boulevard's traffic was increased by the 108% annual growth factor but then an estimated 10% of its traffic was expected to be lost to Livingston Road. In 2005, with the planned roadway improvements in place,the intersection was projected to be at LOS D during the PM Peak Hour,both with and without the project's traffic. The average delay was 35.8 seconds per vehicle without the project's traffic and 36.6 seconds 5 per vehicle with 50%of the project's traffic (see Exhibits 17 and 18). Per Donald Scott, Transportation Planning Manager, 10% of the southbound right and 10% of the eastbound left movements at the intersection were estimated to utilize the loop road in 2004. With the impact of the loop road, 50%of the project's traffic only adds 88 trips to the intersection in 2005 during PM Peak Hour. In 2006, the intersection was projected to remain at LOS D during the PM Peak Hour, both with and without the project's traffic. The average delay was 36.5 seconds per vehicle without the project's traffic and 39.1 seconds per vehicle with the project's traffic (see Exhibits 19 and 20). Per Donald Scott, Transportation Planning Manager, 20% of the southbound right and 20% of the eastbound left movements at the intersection were estimated to utilize the loop road in 2006. With the impact of the loop road,the project's total traffic only adds 176 trips to the intersection in 2006 during PM Peak Hour. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMENTS 1.3/1.4 Exhibit 13 shows numerous key roadway widening projects in North Naples in scheduled in FY 2004. Exhibit 10 shows the 2003 existing traffic with a significant number of roadway segments at LOS F during PSDT. However, all of the roadways segments shown at LOS F during 2003 PSDT will be widened commencing in FY 2004. Vanderbilt Beach Road is at LOS F in 2003 PSDT, between Logan Boulevard and Airport Road. It is scheduled for adding 4 additional lanes: between Airport Road and Livingston Road in FY 2004, between Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard in FY 2005, and between Logan Boulevard and CR 951 in FY 2006. Exhibit 10 also shows Collier Boulevard at LOS F, between Immokalee Road and Golden Gate Boulevard. Commencing in about February 2004, the segment from Immokalee Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road will be widened to 6 lanes, and the segment from Vanderbilt Beach Road to Golden Gate Boulevard will be widened to 4 lanes. That construction project is estimated to take 12 to 14 months. In 2005, Exhibit 11 shows all roadways to be at LOS A or LOS B within the project's RDI, even with 50% of the project's traffic impacting such roadways. In 2006,Exhibit 12 shows all roadways within the project's RDI to be at LOS A or LOS B, even with 100% of the project's traffic included. 4_4 Not applicable. 5.1/5.2 Exhibit 8 shows that the project's total traffic will impact several roadway segments that are currently at LOS F. These are Vanderbilt Beach Road, between Logan Boulevard and Oakes Boulevard,and Collier Boulevard,between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road. However, both of these arterial roadways are scheduled for widening in FY 2003 or FY 2004. Exhibit 11 shows that prior to 50% of the subject project's traffic impacting either of these roadway segments in late 2005,the widening for each is scheduled for completion. 6 7.2 By sharing in the construction costs of the proposed loop road the subject site is proposing to share a common access onto Collier Boulevard and Vanderbilt Beach Road with the neighboring property to the northeast (the proposed Nagel-Craig Business Park PUD), the abutting land to the east (the approved Mission Hills commercial PUD), and the land to the west and north (the proposed Wolf Creek residential PUD). The project will also proposing a connector road from the proposed north-south roadway along the subject property's western boundary to the loop road, located along the subject site's eastern boundary. This will allow residents of the proposed residential Wolf Creek PUD to yin access to the proposed Mission Hills Shopping Center, the proposed business park,and the subject project without getting onto the County's arterial roadway network.. 7.3 The project will meet the latest parking requirements within the LDC at the time of SDP review and approval. Prepared by: Reviewed by: HOOVER PLANNING&DEV.,INC. DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC. V 'i-er1/-a-,1 I _ al • A William L.Hoover,AICP Peter S. Schoenauer,PE HP#340TISI.REP 7 EXI-/IBI T 1 VICINITY MAP N w ,',00 .5 l / !. 1 I 1 S O Immakalee Rd. Mile LO 10 v rn v "o o L.V o v m aa) L a. O Q ti (Loop fid Vanderbilt Beach Rd. ,-/ T 65' Subject m Project m 0 co o --0J Golden Ga oo L Blvd. L a, v o z v, 0 A Pine Ridge Rd. White Blvd. Green Blvd. b N 0 • 0 v c L. v L. Q Q) 'Q 0 c v Golden Gate Parkway Interstate 75 Interstate 75 • — s Ookes Blvd. � � ZZn � CO 'd 0000 '10 inch., cn�Q CC � � ZC a� 222 -E -u = ` � 2 a -+ C7 San ja Barbara Blvd. m y y dco tC r --- p \z o Logan Blvd. ° -,Fz '+ –i –i Z C Co Z cow yl I ani � � � � Acres w .• P �2r pCC � � Z � �1 0 or, m a s r— r r� r— ad .z -el: �, _� s M C o cb C:R. 957 I a / 1� —/ (.,‘ Collier BI vd. c) O \Weber Blvd\ o cn v o� W 2 L_-_____-_____. : C) Nva 0 41' ,s o ( I n A a o rnNQ y2 I IN-II n1. o0 a o �{ a-' R� / i nL � � 'R" I rn - mn � �1 I g m HT1 1\3 c3 t3 o I `` aN M T ° Wilson Blvd. I 0 R. tvn I ----- e © z,„ I \ to N En z ag 1 \C.R. 846 co O O r- o Cf o tie A ` z Z I ~ Z r� a C3 co c ti c C) -1 2.1_1I Everglades Blvd. 1.11 \ a _" 1 �cQ 1 IL 7 DeSoto Blvd. I NJ L1 Interstate 75 Interstate 75 © Oakes Blvd. LI_ co c J co 41 o NI 03 San 'a Barbara Blvd. .1 co Logan Blvd. °n \\\ / 1° N C) Cil CD co to_ cl Cb cb 44 C.R. 951 a 1 a Collier Blvd. ii \Weber Blvd.\ \, ca N. w to c n 4 � o �o g o R1 Z ;o ° —'I CA ov 7 ___,--- Li -" 7 4,1Z, 0 IT; Co 0 rn y iii2 cl DD ° co V (1, 4 Wilson Blvd. I c co „i a �Q 0 0N3 01 \ C.R. 846 co y. o ro x o o y N/ q 0 ° a 3 h O PL oxo co ti. C) Everglades Blvd. NN A ..."*1Q 0 z n DeSoto Blvd. 1 CJI EXH/B/ T 4 TRIP DISTRIBUTION FOR PROJECT'S INGRESS POINTS rn ct PROPOSED PROPOSED (r) WOLF CREEK BUSINESS RESID. PUD PARK 4% 19.5% Loop Rd. < 0.5x. PROPOSED 20% WOLF CREEK BUCKS RUN PUD RESID. PUD MISSION Subject --' HILLS CENTER Site / 379 1• 12% < 12% < 8% VANDERBIL T 20% 1 7% T BEACH RD. 7% > 41% 1N Zi W � E S 0 EXHIBIT 5 TRIP DISTRIBUTION FOR PROJECT'S EGRESS POINTS ct PROPOSED PROPOSED WOLF CREEK BUSINESS RESID. PUD PARK 4% Loop Rd. PROPOSED 19.5% WOLF CREEK 0.5% y BUCKS RUN PUD RESID. PUD MISSION 30% Subject HILLS 20% 7% l I CENTER 10Site 29% 39 ‹-, < 7% E, y ( y VANDERBIL T ro% > 347 > BEACH RD. N W �I4 E m � to L S 0 U Interstate 75 Y Interstate 75I � ,/ o S' Oakes Blvd. co I Pomo 0- 4. I.V San a Barbara Blvd. ViDo e% ° \Logan Blvd. o I/J -10 0 .QO/�lo +c0 cb-, VVb�p cl / 4._ G2, I CR951 I a Collier Blvd. :rt-irri:4 :13;:"1!--4 Weber Blvd -� �C v. \ \ \ ---(0 wtii` '�� ill r C a c)�e`V° .-< X) TO W V per/'co Q V u., (.4 N r o 0 0 0 Z o p 2 D IN. 63 4 U7 Z n _ O0 ? O) m 0 ilT en 1> y -11 _O o) -1-1 o Wilson Blvd. I C) (.h , N.,...„.. aw C.R. q46 _ .stn 0 0 N"'' O Q a a Za ' co ul I C--) Everglades Blvd. (^ A iv0 4�b Aan� rnr / DeSoto Blvd. NI EXHIBIT 7 PLANNED R DA D WA Y I MPR D VEMEN TS lmmokalee Road (C.R. `846) It-37'2 -Lanin aj m in FY 2003 O L Cr) New Road' Ui in FY 2005 V in 6-Laning 2004 Q O Site / V derbil t Beadh Road ' ; 4-Lanin 6-Lani.2'8 n --16 '_in FY 2004 S-Laning in FY 2004 in FY 2004 m Golden Gate Blvd. m O -O a 6-FY 20 a , �' in FY 2007 O - 0 1 Pine Ridge Rd. White Blvd. Green Blvd. `N. rm cc) �`" L. 0\"e O - G r ' i o e 03 v c a G°\Q opµ 0 i , 2 2 , 4 N Miles W Q 0 Interstate 75 S EXHIBIT 8 DETERMINATION OF PROJECT'S RDI KEY: 1) GREATER OF PROJECT'S AM OR PM HOUR TRIPS 2) PERCENT OF ROADWAY'S LOS C AT PEAK HOUR 3) WITHIN RDI? (17; OR MORE OF LOS C) O — Immokalee Road (C.R. 846) b \ li Q.) 22 \14 m 1.2 % m 0.8% a 0 YES ° 97 SI c) 2 s% \C3 3.5% ._, ,,,. .,,-7.2 YES YES LN Lee'Rd V derbilt Beach Road ' _ 32 15 1.2% 5.5% 14 YES s Ea- YES Golden Gate Blvd. m ---------,...,„12s 39% c °'neo\ YES YES o --1 Pine Ridge Rd. White Blvd. /NO 7 Green Blvd. Viz Lo m ' in °' o ,�e o GP o3 Ls G° .c, N 0 .5 r Owe F____i_^ i Interstate 75 EXHIBIT 9 SEASONAL TRAFFIC FACTORS KEY N 1) PSDT/AADT RATIO w - E 0 .5 1 S I I 1 S Immokalee Rd Mile h / a108.82% (7i 0 o v 107.41% it m itL o 0 Q.O 102.09% b nnn Rd. __ Vanderbilt Beach Rd. t T am Subject Project 65 103.68% Q, 99.68% / . 0 o 96.61% Golden Gate o L Blvd. I L. / o aa 99.09% o 3 o, \ .0 S -10 Pine Ridge Rd. White Blvd. Green Blvd. 0 m O Ce O L -0 o 0 a m Q o E 0 Golden Gate Parkway EXHIBIT 10 2003 EXISTING TRAFFIC KEY ,i 1) AADT/LOS w e 2) PSD T/LOS 5 t I I i' lmmnkalee Rd Mile _ _ 22,103 LOS 8 24,052/LOS B b ° 19,672/LOS F o tli m Li Z 21,130/LOS F ec .. c 2 El o° 18,967/LOS F 19,363/LOS F tel Lew Rd Vondeibiltfleoch Rd. pl / Subject C 11,748/LOS B Project /'c 11,71040.5 B ; iii 11,298/LOS ea m b u) 11,714/LOS B.° 18,558/LOS Golden Gate o 17,929/LOS F Blvd. j c ° 20,888/LOS B o S -o o Ab 20,698/LOS B tn -=j n Pine Ridge Rd. White Blvd_ Green Blvd. b 0 k o b a b Q .:c o c o in Golden Gate Parkway EXHIBIT 11 2005 PEAK SEASON DAILY TRAFFIC KEY 1) W/THOUT PROJECT'S TRAFFIC/LOS 2) PROJECT'S TRAFFIC (BASED ON 50% OF PROJECT'S TRAFFIC) 3) WITH PROJECT'S TRAFFIC/LOS N W -it, E 0 .5 7 s I I I Immokalee Rd. Mile IN 28,054/LOS B — a) 108 rn 0 28,162/LOS B o 15 Cr) v 22,181/L OS B o a`i m 7 360 c2Z541/LOS B 22,585/LOS B 13,659/LOS B a 0 162 487 Q 22,747/LOS B 14,146/LOS B b Le Lapp Rd. En Vanderbilt _Beach Rd. ''t.--57,41 J a Subject Project a m 13,659/L OS B — 791 11,614/LOS B o 14,450/LOSE m o /v, 144 .' �/ Golden Gate o a 11,758/LOS B / Blvd. k 18,821/LOS B 0 739 24,142/LOS C GI 19,560/LOS B 3 648 .0 24, 790/LOS C .---j Pine Ridge Rd. White Blvd. Green Blvd. / . N a m 0 0 CC 0 I._ -O o 0 Q . CO O C 0 Golden Gote parkway EXHIBIT 12 2006 PEAK SEASON DAILY TRAFFIC KEY 1) WITHOUT PROJECTS TRAFFIC/LOS 2) PROJECTS TRAFFIC (BASED ON 100% OF PROJECTS TRAFFIC) 3) WITH PROJECTS TRAFFIC/LOS N W , E 0 -5 r 5 I I 0 Immokalee Rd. Mile N. 30,298/LOS C • — 216 rn 30,514/LOS C o ° 23,955/LOS B n`i ti3 6Z721 24,676/LOS B 24,392/LOS B 14,752/LOSS 973 o 324 ,t....* 24,716/LOS B 15,725/LOS B t5 Ctw Vanderbilt_Beach Rd.t�7 y_ Subject j r) Pro%ectl J/ -ti o0 14,752/LOS B N. /c 1,583 a 45 12,543/LOS Bo m 16,335/LOS B -o vl 288 -4Golden Gate 0 b 12,831/LOS B Blvd. 20,327/LOS C 1,478 26,073/LOS C til 21,805/LOS B1,297 � c'' 27,370/LOS C S -=rA. Pine Ridge Rd, White Blvd. Green Blvd. lzi N. 0 o ct o .-' ,a o v Q. a o o o Golden Gate �� Parkway EXHIBIT 13 PROJECT'S AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS KEY: 1) ENTERING TRIPS (178) 2) EXITING TRIPS (41) rn Qz PROPOSED PROPOSED c--) j� WOLF CREEK BUSINESS' RESID. PUD PARK 35 IILoop Rd. E-- < 1 PROPOSED / 8 WOLF CREEK Cs 4 °i BUCKS RUN PUD 1 I MISSION RESID. PUD 12 Subject HILLS 8 3 CENTER 3 4 Site 12 /xI 1 y 31 \-->- -21 ' y <— 14 VANDERBIL T 36 12 12 4 14 2 i BEACH RD. 73 N > W N / E m L K Q S (O V EXHIBIT 14 PROJECT'S PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS KEY: 1) ENTERING TRIPS (127) 2) EXITING TRIPS (232) rn ct 0( PROPOSED PROPOSED v j� WOLF CREEK - BUSINESS z RESID. PUD PARK 25 I5 �1� 9 L o op Rd. 1 PROPOSED I- 45 WOLF CREEK 26n 23 1 BUCKS RUN PUD RESID. PUD 1 70 MISSION Subject HILLS 46 '' 16 CENTER 16 23 Site 67 � I 7 fi VANDERBIL T '--><his f `> < 15 v <- 10 I. 1 12 > BEACH RD. 25 9—> 923 s- 52 N li 'D 4 Ea W Q 1 . E L. (1) -C-5 Exhibit 15 / .s//y Dry / I Road/Weather Conditions IOCC. 2/',SHOW1e,.5 Date , •154-Qz Time 4.46- 4",:0 } Intersection Va iderdl/' O&aC4 g4. 4.4 C8 y-c� t Cr)//IG'/' .9/va1 Roadway Approaching Int. Southbound RT #HV ST ##IV LT #.HV pD RR BS TM VOL North-South Roadway 4 9 3 -14 -/ _ ,ci--0—_/7 ' C. A7, ?5/ .-, . • . . . _ Ailk East - West Roadway 2� 7 2------1-44---6------8----0-----,-1-1------4-1-.4k V,a ndrp4//iL 13&a cA Rd. ,77 2 13.2 10 9 0 ii ..S" 176 34 2 /2 2 6 3 I 26 6 )S9 27 3 87 5 6 o j0 7 120 26 2 89 S 13 0 ,I3 8 l28 272 18 S 65 75 .j' t 118--to-#.= , 12`7- 9 Y-30 .26 .3/ 1 ...5" .5-g- NORTH Roadjay Apprpac;hina Tnt. E.s b•und, Roadway Approaching Int. Westbound LT HV ST #HVWV RT 401VPD RR BS TM VOL LT # ST #HV RT #EIV PT R BS TM ,VOL _0 WWI .. imirdamm.m,..mmi.. sr Z/ 3 26 ,z o- 0 0 1 4 7 7.3.5 /1 -o 16 1/ 13 , 2 13d e ' a I-1 1 6 0 - 0 - 2 2 _ So .f / & 0 57 '/ IC 5 i25' j© 1 . 30 1 - 1 -2 3 '7 —748 /2 ' 1 40 2 1 * 12b 8 / , /a ' -/ 6 o ; d - 1 24 86 3 /6 U 63 4 13 -3- 165 26 3 38 5 6 1 0 .S' 70 F2 2 16 0 57 3 /0 G 165' 3 1 . 4 3 5 U 0 o 32 92 5 ,2o 0 46 3 /o 7 158 12 , 1 IS , 2 8 / o 7 38 8 6 3 /.5" 0 �'.p.3� - 16 F lid 6 0 :/4 2 7 O 1 ê .27 4 '.1 3s- 12'7 Z .M='321- 99 !7/ W 1IJ 'C-._ .- —_re • AWOMI_ it 356 13 67 0 2.6 9 14- 49 63Z 17 S 9 1.2 26 2 1 /6 2 KEY LT = Left Turns ST = Straights Roadway Approaching Int. Northbound RT = Right Turns LT ;:• V ST r V RT .. V P IRR BS TM VOL #HV = # Heavy Vehicles TM = Time Periods* _2g 4 /7 r ' 6 i a I -±-2Y PD = Pedestrians —1T .5 ' 97 1/ 26- .7 1 z 1 sit RR = Right Turn on Red 31 _4-g-_/ Ió J-R- -1 BS = Buses Stopping VOL = LT + ST + RT ---3-2---- • A 7 - J---C1-------'' *TIME PERIOD KEY 20 3 /09 12 7 o o S 136 1 = • :OOA—M7: 115 4:00P :00 : 15 542 Ca 4117 )3 1 0 G 159 2 = 7. 15-700 4 : 15-4: 30 4 93 33 6 //6 1.5 .2 D .0 , 7 )51- 3 = 7 : '0-71:45 4 . 30-4:45 1-944 4 = 7:4 - 41 :00 4 :45-5:00 938 /97 .29 5 /77 18 3 / a 18 169 5 = 8 :09 41 : 15 5:00-5:15 .Sig /97. 217 32 $16 -}t3p 93 0 ' -,f • . '. 1 6 = 8:)!5-: - 30 5: 15-5: 30 5/5 / 96 7 = 8130-8: i5 5: 30-5:45167 /969 / l 8 1 S 479 1 6 2 0 �r5 8 = )3/:45-9:Oa 5:45-6:00 '}-68 /999 Tot = Totals Totals Exhibit 16-A HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1 .ialyst: Bill Hoover, AICP Inter. : CR 951/Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Agency: Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4_24_03Jurisd: Existing Traffic Period: PM Peak Hour Year : 2003 Peak Season Project ID: Catalina Plaza Plan Amendment E/W St: Vanderbilt Beach Road N/S St: Collier Blvd. (CR 951) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I" L T R I L T R I L T R I L TR I I I I 1 1 No. Lanes I 1 1 0 I 0 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 I LGConfig I L TR 1 LTR I L TR I L T R I Volume 1384 72 226 151 102 28 1127 517 19 133 464 134 I ane Width 112. 0 12. 0 1 12 . 0 112. 0 12 . 0 112.0 12 . 0 12. 0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 58 I Duration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left P Thru P Thru P P Right P Right P P Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left P Thru P I Thru P P Right P I Right P P Peds I Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 28 . 0 12 . 0 16. 0 9. 0 Yellow 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 All Red 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1. 0 Cycle Length: 85. 0 secs Exhibit 16-B IPS-Sign.1. 1.1 rile:340-03V/-CA951110• page 2 Intersection Performance "-•mmary . _ pr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate . Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 375 1138 1 . 14 0. 33 118 . 3 F TR 555 1684 0 . 60 0.33 28 . 5 C 79. 1 E Westbound LTR 399 - - - 1210 0 . 50 0. 33 27 . 4 C 27 . 4 C Northbound L .255 1805 0 . 55 0. 14 42 . 4 D TR 734 1890 0. 81 0. 39 32. 7 C 34 . 5 C Southbound L 191 1805 0. 19 0. 11 36. 9 D T 671 1900 0. 77 0. 35 32 . 7 C 31 .2 C R 570 1615 0 . 15 0. 35 19. 3 B Intersection Delay = 47 . 5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1 Bill Hoover, AICP Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. 3785 Airport Road N. , Suite B-1 Naples, FL 34105 Phone: 239-403-8899 Fax: 239-403-9009 E-Mail : Hooverplanningl@aol.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst : Bill Hoover, AICP Agency/Co. : Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Date Performed: 4-24-03 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 951/Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Existing Traffic "nalysis Year: 2003 Peak Season :oject ID: Catalina Plaza Plan Amendment East/West Street North/South Street Vanderbilt Beach Road Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Exhibit 17-A HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 .1 Analyst: Bill Hoover, AICP Inter. : CR 951/Vanderbilt Beach Rd. gency: Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Area Type: All other areas late: 4-24-03 Jurisd: Without Project's Traffic Period: PM Peak Hour Year : 2005 Peak Season Project ID: Catalina Plaza Plan Amendment E/W St: Vanderbilt Beach Road N/S St: Collier Blvd. (CR 951) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound 1 IL T R I L T R I L T R ► L TR I _ _ I I I I 1 No. Lanes 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 I 2 3 1 I 1 3 1 1 LGConfig 1 L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 Volume 1448 84 264 159 119 32 1134 543 21 136 487 140 1 Lane Width 112. 0 12. 0 12 . 0 112 . 0 12. 0 12. 0 112 . 0 12. 0 12. 0 112. 0 12 . 0 12.0 I QTOR Vol 1 53 1 7 1 4 ► 62 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left P Thru P Thru P Right P Right P Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left P Thru P Thru P Right P Right P Peds I Peds NB Right ) EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 14 . 0 25. 0 15. 0 36. 0 Yellow 4 . 0 4 .0 4 . 0 4 . 0 All Red 1 . 0 1 . 0 1.0 1. 0 Cycle Length: 110.0 secs I Exhibit 17-B NCS-Signal. 4.1 Fi1e:3IO-O5VB-CN95110 Page 2 Intersection Performance Summary Apr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach mane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 796 3502 0. 63 0. 23 42 . 0 D T 820 3610 0. 11 0.23 34 . 0 C 42 . 4 D 367 1615 0. 64 0. 23 46. 6 D Westbound L 230 1805 0 . 29 0. 13 46. 6 D T 459 _ _ 3610 0 . 29 0. 13 45 . 1 D 45 . 4 D R 206 1615 0 . 14 0. 13 44 . 0 D Northbound L 478 3502 0 . 31 0. 14 44 .5 D T 1698 5187 0. 36 0. 33 28.7 C 31. 7 C R 529 1615 0 . 04 0. 33 25.3 C Southbound L 246 1805 0 . 16 0.14 43.4 D T 1698 5187 0 . 32 0.33 28 .3 C 29. 0 C R 529 1615 0 . 16 0. 33 27 . 0 C Intersection Delay = 35 . 8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1 Bill Hoover, AICP Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. 3785 Airport Road N. , Suite B-i Naples, FL 34105 Phone : 239-403-8899 Fax: 239-403-9009 E-Mail : Hooverplanningl@aol .com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst : Bill Hoover, AICP Agency/Co. : Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Date Performed: 4-24-03 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 951/Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Without Project' s Traffic Analysis Year: 2005 Peak Season roject ID: Catalina Plaza Plan Amendment East/West Street North/South Street Vanderbilt Beach Road Collier Blvd. (CR 951 ) Exhibit 18-A HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1 nalyst• Bill Hoover, AICP Inter. : CR 951/Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Agency: Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4-24-03 Jurisd: With 50% of Project' s Traffic Period: PM Peak Hour Year : 2005 Peak Season Project ID: Catalina Plaza Plan Amendment E/W St : Vanderbilt Beach Road N/S St: Collier Blvd. (CR 951) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I_ Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I L TR 1 1 1 1 No. Lanes I 2 2 1 I 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 I 1 3 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R 1 L T R I L T R I Volume 1448 90 303 159 124 32 1160 543 21 140 495 140 .mane Width 112. 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 $ 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 $ 12. 0 12. 0 12. 0 112 .0 12 . 0 12.( 1 RTOR Vol I 61 I 7 1 4 1 62 1 Duration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ES Left P NB Left P Thru P Thru P Right P Right P Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left P Thru P Thru P Right P Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 14 . 0 25. 0 15. 0 36,0 Yellow 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4. 0 111 Red 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 , 0 Cycle Length: 110. 0 secs TICS-Signals 4.1 Fi1.:340-05Vl-CR9111WP Exhibit 18-B pa9.2 Intersection Performance Summary ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach 1.,ane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 796 3502 0. 63 0.23 42.0 D T 820 3610 0. 12 0. 23 34 .1 C 44 . 1 D R 367 1615 0 . 73 0. 23 51. 6 D Westbound L 230 1805 0.29 0 . 13 46. 6 D T 459 _ _ 3610 0. 30 0. 13 45.2 D 45 .5 D R 206 1615 0 . 14 0. 13 44 . 0 D Northbound L 478 3502 0. 37 0 . 14 45. 4 D T 1698 5187 0. 36 0. 33 28 .7 C 32 . 4 C R 529 1615 0. 04 0. 33 25.3 C Southbound L 246 1805 0. 18 0. 14 43. 6 D T 1698 5187 0.32 0. 33 28 . 3 C 29.2 C R 529 1615 0 . 16 0 . 33 27 . 0 C Intersection Delay = 36. 6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1 Bill Hoover, AICP Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. 3785 Airport Road N. , Suite B-1 Naples, FL 34105 Phone: 239-403-8899 Fax: 239-403-9009 E-Mail: Hooverplanningl@aol .com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Bill Hoover, AICP Agency/Co. : Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Date Performed: 4-24-03 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 951/Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Area Type : All other areas Jurisdiction: With 50% of Project' s Traffic Analysis Year: 2005 Peak Season 'roject ID: Catalina Plaza Plan Amendment East/West Street North/South Street Vanderbilt Beach Road Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Exhibit 19-A HCS2000: signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1 nnalyst : Bill Hoover, AICP Inter. : CR 951/Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Agency: Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4-24-03 Jurisd: Without- Project' s Traffic Period: PM Peak Hour Year : 2006 Peak Season Project ID: Catalina Plaza Plan Amendment E/W St: Vanderbilt Beach Road N/S St: Collier Blvd. (CR 951) SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 . Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound 1LT R1L T R1L T AIL TR 1 1 i 1 1 1 No. Lanes12 2 111 2 112 3 111 3 1 LGConfig1LT R1LT R1LT R1LTR 1 Volume 1484 91 285 164 129 35 1145 586 23 139 526 151 1 ,ane Width 112 . 0 12. 0 12 . 0 112. 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 112. 0 12. 0 12 .0 112 . 0 12. 0 12 .( 1 RTOR Vol 1 57 1 8 1 5 i 67 I _ Duration 0. 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left P NB Left P Thru P Thru P Right P Right P Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left P Thru P Thru Right P Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 14 .0 25. 0 15.0 36. 0 Yellow 4 . 0 4 .0 4 . 0 4 . 0 All Red 1. 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1. 0 Cycle Length: 110. 0 secs i I Exhibit 19-B ICS-Signals 4.1 Fi1.:JO0-Mil-Gt951w0 Page _ Intersection Performance Summary 1ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 796 3502 0. 68 0.23 43. 4 D T 820 3610 0. 12 0.23 34 . 1 C 43 . 9 D R 367 1615 0. 69 0. 23 49. 1 D Westbound L 230 1805 0.31 0. 13 47 . 1 D T 4593610 0. 31 0 . 13 45. 4 D 45 . 7 D R 206 J 1615 0 . 15 0. 13 44 .2 D Northbound L 478 3502 0. 34 0. 14 44 . 9 D T 1698 5187 0 . 38 0. 33 29. 1 C 32 . 1 C R 529 1615 0. 04 0. 33 25. 3 C Southbound L 246 1805 0. 17 0. 14 . 43. 6 D T 1698 5187 0. 34 0 . 33 28 . 6 C 29. 3 C R 529 1615 0. 18 0. 33 27 .1 C Intersection Delay = 36. 5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1 Bill Hoover, AICP Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. 3785 Airport Road N. , Suite B-1 Naples, FL 34105 Phone: 239-403-8899 Fax: 239-403-9009 E-Mail: Hooverplanningl@aol . com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Bill Hoover, AICP Agency/Co. : Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Date Performed: 4-24-03 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: CR 951/Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: Without Project' s Traffic Analysis Year: 2006 Peak Season Project ID: Catalina Plaza Plan Amendment East/West Street North/South Street Vanderbilt Beach Road Collier Blvd. (CR 951) Exhibit 20-A HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1 Analyst: Bill Hoover, AICP Inter. : CR 951/Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Agency: Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4-24-03 Jurisd: With 100% of Project's Traffic Year 2006 Peak Season Period: PM Peak Hour Project ID: Catalina Plaza Plan AmendmentN/S St: Collier Blvd. (CR 951) E/W St: Vanderbilt Beach Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1- -Eastbound Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound 1 IL T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 L TR 1 1 I 1 1 I No. Lanes 1 2 2 1 I 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 I 1 3 1 1 LGConfig I L T R I LT R 1 L T R1LTR 1 151 Volume 1484 103 364 164 139 35 1197 586 23 146 542 I Lane Width 112.0 12 . 0 12. 0 112 . 0 12 . 0 12.0 112. 0 12. 0 12. 0 112 ..0 12. 0 12. RTOR Vol I 73 I 8 I .5 1 67 1 Duration 0 . 25 Area Type : All other areas Signal Operations 4 5 6 7 8 Phase Combination 1 2 3 EB Left P NB Left P Thru P Thru P Right P Right P Peds Peds WB Left P SB Left P Thru P Thru P Right P Right P Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right a Green 14. 0 25. 0 15. 0 36. 0 Yellow 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 All Red 1 . 0 1 .0 1 . 0 1 . 0 Cycle Length: 110. 0 secs Exhibit 20-B MCS-51gnala 4.1 111e:340-06Ve-Ca9510P Page 2 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 796 3502 0. 68 0.23 43. 4 D T 820 3610 0. 14 0.23 34 . 3 C 49. 7 D R 367 1615 0. 88 0.23 65. 8 E Westbound L 230 1805 0. 31 0. 13 47 . 1 D T 45-9 - 3610 0. 34 0. 13 45.7 D 45. 9 D R 206 1615 0. 15 0. 13 44 .2 D Northbound L 478 3502 0. 46 0. 14 46. 9 D T 1698 5187 0 . 38 0.33 29. 1 C 33. 4 C R 529 1615 0 . 04 0. 33 25. 3 C Southbound L 246 1805 0 . 21 0. 14 44 . 1 D T 1698 5187 0 . 35 0. 33 28. 7 C 29. 6 C R 529 1615 0 . 18 0 . 33 27. 1 C Intersection Delay - 39. 1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1 Bill Hoover, AICP Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. 3785 Airport Road N. , Suite B-1 Naples, FL 34105 Phone: 239-403-8899 Fax: 239-403-9009 E-Mail : Hooverplanningl@aol .com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Bill Hoover, AICP Agency/Co . : Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. Date Performed: 4-24-03 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: - CR 951/Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: With 100% of Project ' s Traffic Analysis Year: 2006 Peak Season Project ID: Catalina Plaza Plan Amendment East/West Street North/South Street Vanderbilt Beach Road Collier Blvd. (CR 951) ITEM V.E. 1 -3 Davidson Engineering, Inc. LAND DEVELOPMENT•UTILITIES•PERMITTING•WATER MANAGEMENT•FEASIBILITY STUDIES April 22,2003 Collier County Development Services Long Range Planning Department Attn: David Weeks,Chief Planner 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,Florida 34104 Ref: Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Additional 15.88 acres of land to the Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Sub-district. Dear Mr.Weeks, The following addresses the items listed in section V.E of the Application for a Request to Amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan: V.E.1 Public Facilities The following is an analysis for the Potable Water and Sanitary flows for the proposed retail and office space square footage under the proposed Comp.Plan amendment Potable Water Estimated Flows under Proposed Amendment The following calculations are derived from information found in Potable Water Sub- Element of the Public Facilities Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance No.2002-54. The proposed Comp. Plan Amendment 60,000 s.f of retail space and 90,000 s.f of office space.The typical water use rate for retail space is 0.1 gpd/s.£ The typical water use rate for office space is 20 gpd per employee.The total potable water use for this development is estimated at 19,500 GPD or 0.0195 MGD. Total 19,500 GPD (.0195 MGD) The project is located in the service area of the North Collier County Water Treatment Facility. The subject project is located within the Urban Area with standards for Potable Water established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service(LOS)Standards and 2002 Annual Update and Inventory Report(AUIR)for Potable Water are as follows: 2154 TRADE CENTER WAY,SUITE#3,NAPLES,FLORIDA 34109 • 2.39.597-3916 • FAX 239-597-5169 Potable Water LOS Standard 185 GPD/Capita Available Inventory as of 9/30/02 32.0 MGD Required Inventory as of 9/30/07 38.5 MGD Planned CIE FY 03-07 20.0 MGD 5-Year Surplus or(Deficit) 13.5 MGD Minimum standards for Potable Water are being met or exceeded and the proposed increase of 0.0195 MGD will not significantly change the projection. Sanitary Sewer Estimated Flows under Proposed Amendment The following calculations are derived from information found in Sanitary Sewer Sub- Element of the Public Facilities Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance No.2002-54. A typical sanitary sewer use for retail space is 0.10 gpd/s.f. The typical sewer use rate for office space is 20 gpd per employee. This would equate to approximately 19,500 GPD or 0.0195 MGD for the proposed project. Total 19,500 GPD (0.0195 MGD) The project is located in the service area of the North Collier County Water Reclamation Facility. The subject project is located within the Urban Area with standards for Sanitary Sewer established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service(LOS)Standards and 2002 Annual Update and Inventory Report(AUIR)for Sanitary Sewer are as follows: Sanitary Sewer LOS Standard 145 GPD/Capita Available Inventory as of 9/30/02 18.8 MGD Required Inventory as of 9/30/07 17.7 MGD Planned CIE FY 03-07 5.3 MGD 5-Year Surplus or(Deficit) 6.4 MGD Minimum standards for Sanitary Sewer are being met or exceeded and the proposed increase of 0.0195 MGD will not significantly change the projection. Drainage The subject project is located within the Urban Area with standards for Drainage established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service(LOS)Standards and 2002 Annual Update and Inventory Report(AUIR)for Drainage are as follows: Drainage LOS Standard Future Development—25 year,3 day storm Existing Development—current service level Available Inventory as of 9/30/02 374 Canal Miles Required Inventory as of 9/30/07 374 Canal Miles Planned CIE FY 03-07 14 Canal Miles 5-Year Surplus or(Deficit) N/A The proposed development in the amendment area will be designed to comply with the 25 yr,3 day routing requirements. Solid Waste: The established LOS for capital solid waste facilities is two years of landfill lined cell disposal capacity at present fill rates and ten years of landfill raw land capacity at present fill rates. No adverse impacts to the existing solid waste facilities are anticipated from this 150,000 square foot project. The subject project is located within the Urban Area with standards for Solid Waste established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service(LOS)Standards and 2002 Annual Update and Inventory Report(AUIR)for Solid Waste are as follows: Solid Waste LOS Standard 10 year of permittable capacity at average disposal rate/previous(5)years Available Inventory as of 9/30/02 8,833,453 Site Tons Required Inventory as of 9/30/07 5,655,833 Site Tons Planned CIE FY 03-07 0 Site Tons 5-Year Surplus or(Deficit) 912,258 Site Tons Parks: Community and Re¢ional The subject project is located within the Urban Area with standards for Community and Regional Parks established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The currently adopted minimum Level of Service(LOS) Standards and 2002 Annual Update and Inventory Report(AUIR)for Community and Regional Parks are as follows: Community Park Lands LOS Standard 1.2882 acres per 1000 population Available Inventory as of 9/30/02 459.6 Acres Required Inventory as of 9/30/07 390.9 Acres Planned CIE FY 03-07 0 Acres 5-Year Surplus or(Deficit) 87.7 Acres Regional Park Lands LOS Standard 2.9412 acres per 1000 population Available Inventory as of 9/30/02 1045.1 Acres Required Inventory as of 9/30/07 1016.3 Acres Planned CIE FY 00-04 108.0 Acres 5-Year Surplus or(Deficit) 136.8 Acres Minimum standards for County Community and Regional Parks are being met or exceeded. V.E.3—Public Facilities The proposed commercial project would have no effect on schools. The proposed project would increase the requirement for fire/police protection and emergency medical services but the estimated costs of these 3 services would be offset by the applicant paying impact fees,at the time of permitting. Police protection would be provided by the Collier County Sheriff's Department. Fire protection would be provided the North Naples Fire District. Emergency medical services would be provided by Collier County EMS. Thank you for your consideration. Please call if you require additional information. Sincerely, ptit Peter S.Schoenauer,P.E. Project Manager Davidson Engineering,Inc. ITEM V.E. 1-3 Continued PUBLIC FACILITIES LOCATION MAP I0Olmmokalee Rood o 0 t. poi s w ch an t r a �c Li �p // Subject J Project g I \ A. "�_ Vanderbilt Beach Road ® Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. te Orange ge E j m Blossom Dr. q a item V. /� Golden Gate Blvd. J#C shit `' tt 1 1�/ OE C n 0 Q El. 4 P/ne Ridge Rood Pine Ridge Rd. Willie B/WI 0 V 05 1 `a 1--I a Mile b Green B/rd o; Green B/vd`c..5 o o Et o. V m .s h m Q i a b 2 g , v m 13©O, y Gorden Gate Pkwy Q Q .4 w s Q E terstote 75 0 .5 7 I a Exit 15------. Mile Radio Rd. y EXIS77NG SERVICES AND PUBLIC FACILITIES MAP tax 0 F7RE DEPT. 0 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 0 SHERIFF'S SUBSTATION Q SCHOOLS L WA7ER 7REATAlENT PLANT ® WASTE WATER 'TREATMENT PLANT 1 I . . . , :. . 1 1 , i PO 11 0 - - - _ —4 a - — 0 ..:. *•• . ' ---„--- ,... . . 0 co [11 0 A • / . 0 U. . PI a, 0 - . to", ' . . . It, 'V M 11 s— . RI 0 . '0 40 CD . fri , ... . • - N. ....—..............— . % g I —rZ "Z 3E tn In , G) 4 -• i— r 6,a-it •-4 , . ,. Pi , .„. - ‘ . I. _.. , _ , _ , • . . . . . , . • . ' . .':.• , 1,„ .„ . , : . ... ., . . . , .. . , se e .... - (ca._i 4%.A , , 1 • - . r- . , _ C ,f. ,57 ?4... la 1 go..y. .......- ....i..zet...1 3 . -. E 'D'A wall I Wir Item v.G.3.a 2628633 OR: 2670 P0. 0578 'This Instrument Prepared By RICORDID 1n OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIIR COUNTY, Pt • 05/01/2000 at 03:54PN DWIGHT I. BROCK, CURS and Please Return To: CONS 509760.00 RSC PSI 15.00 o4 f JOHN F. STEDDC .70 ?568.60 c ' SHEPPARD, BRETTWART, STEWART tett: 4 t'Q div &HERSCH, P.A. SHSPPARD BRITT IT AL P 0 01M111 400 4i. ys 2121 West First Street [T MU IL 13901 3, P. O. Drawer 400 Fort Myers, Florida 33902 Grantee(s)S.S #65-0877951 THIS WARRANTY DEED, made this ac) day of 1 I , 2000, between Harvey Bros. Farms,Inc.,a Maryland corporation whose post office address is: 7373 Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Naples, Florida 34119 hereinafter called the grantor, to Mark L. Lindner,Trustee unrecorded Land Trust U/T/D 1- 4-99 with full power and authority either to protect,conserve and to sell,or to lease or to encumber or otherwise manage and dispose of the real Rroperty described herein whose post office address is: 4099 Tamiami Trail North, 2 Floor Naples, Florida 34103 hereinafter called the grantee: (Wherever used herein the terms"grantor" and "grantee"include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations) WITNESSETH,that the grantor, fbr and in consideration of the sum of S10.00 and other valuable considerations,receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens,remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee all that certain land situate in Collier County, State of Florida, viz: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT"A" Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record,if any, and taxes for 1999 and subsequent years. Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification Number: A portion of 00204040002 1 Item V.G. 3.a OR: 2670 PG: 0579 • TOGETHER,with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD,the same in fee simple forever. AND the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple;that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever;and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 1999. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, Sealed and Delivered Harvey Bros. Farms, Inc.,a Maryland in 0 Presence: corporation j • ' rt. By: tf Witness Si t V ature Fred R. Harvey, Presjttnt Pri i e of Wi ss wa0 tness Si 144!tur: 1. Printed Name of Witness STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2c T.9 day of Afg L 2000, by FRED R. HARVEY,as President of Harvey Bros. Farms, Inc., a Maryland corporation, who is personally known to me or who has produced _ as identification. _% 4 . . (Seal) Notary blic My Commission Expires: Printed Notary Signature SHERRY N.WEB MY CO MISSION/CC 510566 •}'ar tie � ryosnbert18e2, 2 Item V.G.3.a *** OR: 2670 PG: 0580 *** EXHIBIT "A" A tract or parcel of land located in the S ''/ of the SE '/4 of the SE '/.of Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East,Collier County, Florida and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 34 run N 01° 26' 37" W along the Easterly right-of-way of State Road 951 and the Easterly line of said Section 34 for 145.13 feet; thence run N 88` 55'54" W for 100.09 feet to the Westerly right-of-way of said State Road 951 and the Northerly right-of-way of Vanderbilt Road; thence run N 88° 55' 54" W along said Northerly right-of-way for 665.33 feet to the Point of Beginning of the lands herein described; thence continue N 88° 55'54" W along said right-of-way for 665.67 feet; thence run N 010 26' 38" W for 523.86 feet to the Northerly line of said S '/2 of the SE '/ of the SE '/4 of said Section 34; thence run S 88° 57' 19" E along said fractional lire for 665.66 feet; thence run S 01° 26' 39" E for 524.14 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 8 acres, more or less. Item V.G.3.b This Instrument Prepared By and Please Return To: 2o ' OR: pp ' PG: 2869 JOHN F. STEWART RIC RI II In OFFICIALO ICORDI f COLI IR COORITT FL SI-fEPPARD, BRETT, STEWART 05/29/2001 It 0::14PK DWIGHT I. POCK. CLARK & HERSCH, P.A. COP S5D536.00 2121 West First Street RIC !El 15.00 P. O. Drawer 400 Doc .10 3I54.2t Fort Myers, Florida 33902 IBIPPARD ORM IT AL 2121 V IP IT FT PM PL 31901 Grantee(s)S.S. #65-0877951 THIS WARRANTY DEED, made this ,r) ' day of 1414k,,1 , 2001, between Harvey Bros. Farms, Inc.,a Maryland corporation f whose post office address is: 7373 Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension Naples, Florida 34 119 hereinafter called the grantor,to Mark L Lindner,Trustee unrecorded Land Trust U/T/D I-4.99 with full power and authority either to protect.conserve and to sell, or to lease or to encumber or otherwise manage and dispose of the real property described herein whose post office address is: 4099 Tarniami Trail North, 2"6 Floor Naples, F'Iorida 34103 hereinafter called the grantee: (Wherever used herein the tormi "grantor"and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs,legal representatives and assigns of individual, and the successors and assigns of corporations) WITNESSETH,that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of$10 00 and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee all that certain land situate in Collier County, State of Florida, viz: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT"A" Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record, if any, and taxes for 2001 and subsequent years. Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification Number. A portion of 00204040002 ► Item V.G.3.b OR: 2832 PG: 2870 TOGETHER,with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever AND the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple;that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell ana convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever;and that said land is free of all encumbrances,except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2000. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, Sealed and Delivered Harvey Bras. Farms, Inc„a Maryland in Our Presence: corporation 111/43elf By: /01-0 Witness Signature Fred R. Harvey, Preside' 'Zor , r (1'. 4,-'116:40 — Printed Name of Witness I tness Si!nal Printed Name of Witness STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ..23 day of tfQ 2001,by FRED R. HARVEY, as President of Harvey Bros. Farms, Inc.,a Maryland corptfration. -IP 10 ii personafly.'mown is me or who has produced as identification. .11111G„ I f { ._ (Seal) Notary Public ;(C 41er', C1 it e I''��t '1/1�.4_.._ My Commission Expires: Printed Notary Signature f w, Kathleen Den Valet** 4. -y7 to COWIN%N S CMS DOMES 2 Ws I�! Ewe g0YIAmbar 211,mum ML `fid • Item V.G.3.b *** OR: 2832 PG: 2871 *** EXHIBIT"A" A portion of the South 'h of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast '•.of Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows Commence at the Southeast Corner of Section 34, Township 48 South. Range '_a Fast, Collier County, Florida; thence north 880 59' 06" West, along the south line oI'the Southeast ' of said Section 34, a distance of 2,096.56 feet; thence North 010 28' 07" West, a distance of 145.00 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-way line of Vanderbilt 'toad, the same being the point of beginning of the parcel of land herein described, thence departing from said northerly right-of-way line, continue North 01° 28' 07" West, a distance of 523 75 feet, thence South 8') 00'49" East, a distance of 665.64 feet;thence South 01°28'07" East, a distance of 524 05 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-way line of said Vanderbilt Road, thence North 88" 59' OW' West, along said northerly right-of-way line, a distance 01.665.65 feet to the point of beginning Containing 8.0 acres, more or less. 0 Item V.c.3.c 2988374 OR: 3043 PG: 2662 This Instrument Prepared By RICORDID 1n OPPICIAL RICORDS of CDLLIIR COM!, f1 05/21/2002 at 02:45PN DWIGR? I. BROCK, CLIRt and Please Return To: CONS 594656.DC RIC II 15.00 JOHN F. STEWART DOC-910 9162.90 SHEPPARD,BRETT,STEWART Rets: HERSCH&KINSEY, P.A. SHIPPARD BRITT I? Al 2121 West First Street P 0 DRAM 430 P.O.Drawer 400 P7 NTIRB P1 33902 Fort Myers,Florida 33902 Grantee(s)S.S.#65-0877951 THIS WARRANTY DEED,made this 22nd day of May ,2002,between Harvey Bros. Farms,Inc.,a Maryland corporation whose post office address is: 7373 Vanderbilt Beach Road.Extension Naples,Florida 34119 hereinafter called the grantor,to Mark L. Lindner,Trustee unrecorded Land Trust U/T/D 1-4-99 with full power and authority either to protect,conserve and to sell,or to lease or to encumber or otherwise manage and dispose of the real property described herein whose post office address is: 4980 Tamiami Trait,N.,Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 hereinafter called the grantee: (Wherever used herein the terms"grantor"and"grantee"include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals,and the successors and assigns of corporations) WITNESSETH,that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of$10.00 and other valuable considerations,receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,hereby grants,bargains,sells, aliens,remises,releases,conveys and confirms unto t)te grantee all that certain land situate in Collier County,State of Florida,viz: V SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" Subject to easements,restrictions and reservations of record, if any, and taxes for 2002 and subsequent years. Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification Number: A portion of 00204040002 Item v.G.3'c OR: 3043 PG: 2663 TOGETHER,with all the tenements,hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD,the same in fee simple forever. AND the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple;that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land,and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever;and that said land is free of all encumbrances,except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31,2001. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said grantor has signed and sealed those presents the day and year first above written. Signed,Sealed and Delivered Harvey Bros. Farms, Inc.,a Maryland in Our Presence: corporation l _ By: f i4 •�-„< Witness Si grurc Fred R.Harvey,Preside CRC?ONEI a I-iiKi — Printed Name bf Witness Witness Signature Ch 1 C. A AZ.r. Printed Name of Witness STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Le.e. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Q.,2 day of 2002,by FRED R. HARVEY,as President of Harvey Bros. Farms, Inc.,a Maryloncorpo ation, who is personally known to me N as identification. _ *am/ (Seal) Notary 'ubli 11.1 My Commission Expires: Printed Notary Signature off'. JOHN F Si rWART �j, 4 I+IMIISION r('(71;g6I ?a lio' MIRY'S IMwmIt 2 1-IM0.l N 1ARY Fla Now,sot gem Boo Co Item V.G. 3. * >r OR: 3043 PG: 2664 *** • EXHIBIT"A" A PORTION OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 34,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE 88°59'06" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTON 34, A DISTANCE OF 2,096.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°28'07" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 145.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF VANDERBILT ROAD. THE SAME BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE NORTH 88°59'06" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 541.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°05'46" WEST CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 124.85 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING FROM SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. NORTH 01°26'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 523.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°05'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 118.77 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34;THENCE DEPARTING FROM THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE SOUTH 89°00'49" FAST. A DISTANCE OF 547.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°28'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 523.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 8.0 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS,AND/OR RESERVATIONS OF RECORD. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON REFER TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 34 AS BEING NORTH 88°59'06"WEST(ASSUMED). ITEM V.G.4 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize Davidson Engineering, Inc. & Hoover Planning & Dev. , Inc. (Name of Agent) to serve as y Agent in a reque to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property id tifie in this Applic tion. Signed: Date: y d,7 (Name of Owner(s)of Record) Mark L. Lindner, Trustee I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. ‘>df Signature of Applicant William L. Hoover Name-Typed or Printed STATE OF ( _ ) COUNTY OF ( ) Savor I o and subscribed before me this v Q day of 413r i f ,'f43d C�-�_ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NotaryPublic ' JESSICA BERGERON NOTARY OF FLORIDA CHeOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: COMMISSION I CC873970 who-is personally known to me,/ ,/�/� EXPIRES 912372003 o has produced � 1 \Y e� V BONDED THRU ASA 1-000 NOTARYI {CpfZ�as identification and did take an Oath did not take an Oath NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06-False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of$500.00 and/or maximum of a sixty day jail term." 7 MEETING NOTES COLLIER COUNTY **** DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT **** DATE I —it- 63 TIME )/.) , ( °1) NOTES BY 1/4 1,11141°' TOPIC OF MEETING 6,41 P4 7°r 15. 4 Ac. sif oh Al!! VIA '/' n,r'/i z''1` 6,2-Pi gx od 14-44-1;It Jot6s44 I/Jds- Y1rL <fl.+ `/ 44:040,41' AT 'END CE(print name clearly) f,// /Mine ibev- P4840/�+�i fGr oll ! 14M MLR, , DA-re to. r r LitvrA Rays KEY POINTS/UNDERSTANDINGS/CONCLUSIONS "17 44-4,f A. i '" ? A• `tar 11-A# Awe, 14.ieS ''+ Pd11191/1j1 frv.- )11-4- �ltfMj 5714;5 474%Lf lk-3.01f ro pPle- 1'©,••2 ee,ff�r�c l� v5ef - Il:5 � C� Simon 010 rti ,i .,,vrz 0-Ec) Pi4 mil j`b A)..9 3.n rii)c +m,€t-- .)/217s -' tvi 11f ea.,-/c„ /4;fsf o,, /x:11 Pi) /viper 5/.10- G�1. .•by, 9.4,rJ i4 "Arle"'lrr,e bt,�i,� ,`M rn.) ?t'41(/«.�'/�/ ). /2740i%. /yt 4,t4, S/-f Pc pf wavr.e.,f kZ 301,•.rr15(-40 : !/ri//ham 7' f z 1'7`i'. g'+19/ ANI-144- O-/' /trial t,.i 9, I ; m41/ opi z . vh i''-/ DRC)Ppl 1-e c,-), 'i/y5,s - itipj.' t. U-tii.J &Pei $I/, 5 .b),5fv;zie tiprrw,cl 41.4. aki46 /' cvb jisfi,i r ( 7 7 t 0.,r) 23 +i"ei 6rkim4 ,) Chi yipc 1-C , /V'111 L./el/14-„ cfi t15 .0 f/J ro.. l S41.). C4/44,c.r, of VVs--/ /VG Tk✓f$ of r--) hit e...e.idie / i#v;, 1,6141 T 7-7;194- L. / r, I..(. 2 /rio;f/ f 1941 101 ZUCJJ 1.3.4 1 OJ 7J r tr .-..,•"�-,-... - Apr 17 03 01:55p t'•2 ADDRESSING CHECKLLSTmts1 e complete the following p4 submit to the Addressing Section for Review. Not all hems will apply to even oiect. Items m bold tyre are required. 1. Legal description of subject property or properties(copy of lengthy description may be attached) be TS 7`4# ,p l�� f - �- V 1 e/ b:1+ . - . Wet /Po W 2. Folio(Property m)no ber(s)of above(attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) eF /a teQ �s 00.2oy7463o8 _ r 0oy,,Z --" /[mvcP/ POI/J. %s O&: di/77``6070 3. Street address or addresses(as applicable, if already assigned) + . C- S 4. Location map,showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right-of-way(attach) 5. Copy of survey(NEEDED ONLY FOR UNPLATTED PROPERTIES) 6. Proposed project name(if applicable) �42Q_ CceI41; tea 7. Proposed Street names(i applicable) ar CK1t fh ►+Q bit; U E r.7�itz� tao.mc., tboA A14�CbL 1S o •w.\i . -4r<. a. Site Development Plan Number(FOR EXISTING P'OJECTS/SITES ONLY) SDP /V4 -. 9. Petition Type—(Complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition Type) ❑SDP(She Development Plan) 0 PPL (Plans&Plat Review) ❑ SDPA(SDP Amendment) U PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) O SDP1 (SDP Insubstantial Change) 0 FP (Final Plat) 0 SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) o SIPA (SIP Amendment) 0 BL (Blasting Permit) ❑SNR(Street Name Change) U ROW (Right-of-Way Permit) ❑Vegetation/Exotic(Veg.Removal Permits) ❑EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑Land Use Petition(Variance,Conditional Usc, 0 VRSFP (Veg.Removal&Site Fill Permit) Boat Dock Ext.,Rezone,PUD rezone,etc.) $Other-Describe: l q r d t 10.Project or development names proposed for,or already appearing in,condominium documents(if applicable; indicate whether proposed or existing) N ft 11.Please Check One: %Checklist is to be Faxed Back 0 Personally Picked Up 12• Applicant Name g:// gaol,r Phone veg.-fen Fa: Y. 0 3— o d 9 13.Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Section. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Primary Number 34116 Address Number 33599 I Address Number 3Z-51,32. Address Number Approved by Date U..- l 8'Co )1.t m DE IME RANO ook ATTACHMENT "C" ORIGINAL GMPA APPLICATION- NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING SYNOPSIS Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA February 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): Synopsis provide by Lisa Koehler, Public Information Coordinator The NIM was held on March 10, 2005 at 5:30 P.M. at North Naples Baptist Church. Six people attended the meeting. Bill Hoover, representing the applicant, gave an overview of the project and the PUD document. There were no concerns expressed about the rezoning or the proposed uses and development. Those attending asked clarifying questions about uses allowed in the PUD document. Mr. Hoover explained that there would be no gas stations, no convenience stores with gas pumps, no tire store, and no fast food with drive-thru. He did explain that they were anticipating a bank building, an upscale restaurant, retail and offices with up to 64 condominiums on the second and third floors of the office/retail area. He also clarified that none of those units were affordable housing units. Maximum building height proposed in the PUD would be three stories. a PUD 1�- k4 .114)\ Neighborhood Information Meeting -'b`� Carolina Villa9 , -°� 5 Thursday, March 10, 2005a -6414- Sign-in Sign-in Sheet NAME ADDRESS PHONE ‘11,442-4 k�� ,t.- r, // 1741— f%76 1/ ,�-� G,...-. ....1e.770 y rtle e-__"-- ,,,—.7.z. 6-/__- '(, - ( c) 0.,- (7-tiJO 04' / z-/t3—c--730- - 01('N 1\(\Clgti c_.n c.., ,.1 -,..2qn---E3 i2,rel„ -1 o.r 6,1 o.s.c-l.. 'l o o i Te.,,.....::-Tr. *J S,.AO ov I--!3 s -!s 3S TVr`-IX Si /C 378SAlel PM T V) A OILTy 157f g-1 4/03-f389 9 0 ifrAffell Aso-t. %4C0 bulk,42.4 blued 2.62., 554 -(1-22) DC DAYH[ $RQN ATTACHMENT "D" EXISTING AND PROPOSED POPULATION DATA Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE DAVIDSON fNf.INf FkINC: Existing Local Population: Demographic information is an excellent indicator of demand for proposed services that are currently in short supply. Population statistics for the market study were determined based upon a 3.5-mile radial distance from the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Collier Boulevard(please refer to Attachment E). In order to identify an accurate depiction of the population within the area of study the AUIR 2016 based upon BEBR medium growth rate projections information obtained from Collier County has been referenced. The AUIR 2016 identifies the area of study within four planning communities; refer to Attachment F. Within these planning communities the percentage of land representative of the 3.5-mile radius boundary was calculated to obtain a more precise population within the area of study, please refer to Table 1—Planning Community Area Calculations. Table 1—Planning Community Area Calculations for 3.5-Mile Distance Golden Gate Total Area w/in Planning Community 9,539 Acres Planning Study Area w/in Planning Community 1,146 Acres Community Percentage of Planning Community 12.01% Urban Estates Total Area w/in Planning Community 22,257 Acres Planning Study Area w/in Planning Community 14,941 Acres Community Percentage of Planning Community 67.13% Rural Estates Total Area w/in Planning Community 75,188 Acres Planning Study Area w/in Planning Community 6,822 Acres Community Percentage of Planning Community 9.07% Corkscrew Total Area w/in Planning Community 181,924 Acres Planning Study Area w/in Planning Community 1720 Acres Community Percentage of Planning Community 0.95% Utilizing the percentage calculated within Table 1,the following projections for permanent populations has been interpreted for the four aforementioned planning communities within Table 2. Please refer to Attachment E for specific AUIR 2016 referenced data. Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE DAVIDSON Table 2—Calculated Permanent Population 2015 within Market Study(3.5 Mile Distance) Golden Gate Permanent Population in 2016 45,540 Planning Community Percentage of Study Area w/in Planning Community 12.01% Approximate Population w/in 3.5 mile 5,469 Urban Estates Permanent Population in 2016 43,878 Planning Community Percentage of Study Area w/in Planning Community 67.13% Approximate Population w/in 3.5 mile 29,455 Rural Estates Permanent Population in 2016 36,052 Planning Community Percentage of Study Area w/in Planning Community 9.07% Approximate Population w/in 3.5 mile 3,270 Corkscrew Planning Permanent Population in 2016 11,541 Community Percentage of Study Area w/in Planning Community 0.95% Approximate Population w/in 3.5 mile 110 Total Permanent Population w/in Market Study: 38,304 To interpret the Peak population,additional information from the AUIR 2016 was evaluated resulting in a calculated 16.67% increase in population during peak season. This information ultimately, results in a base permanent population of 38,304 persons and peak seasonal population of 44,689 persons. To further define the population directly impacted by the proposed services, the same analysis was performed within a 0.5-mile radius from the development site. The AUIR 2016 identifies the aforementioned area of study within two planning communities; refer to Attachment G. Using the same technique previously completed for the 3.5-mile distance,the following results were obtained. Table 3—Planning Community Area Calculations for 0.5 Mile Distance Urban Estates Total Area w/in Planning Community 22,257 Acres Planning Area in Study 6,060 Acres Community Study Area w/in Community 27.23% Rural Estates Total Area w/in Planning Community 75,188 Acres Planning Area in Study 67 Acres Community Study Area w/in Community 0.09% Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE DAVIDSONa Table 4-Calculated Permanent Population 2015 within Market Study(0.5 Mile Distance) Urban Estates Population in 2016 43,878 Planning Percentage of Study Area w/in Planning Community 27.23% Community Approximate Population w/in 3.5 mile 11,948 Rural Estates Population in 2016 36,052 Planning Percentage of Study Area w/in Planning Community 0.09% Community Approximate Population w/in 3.5 mile 32 Total Population: 11,980 This information ultimately, results in a base permanent population of 11,980 persons and peak seasonal population of 13,977 persons. Proposed Population Growth: To further define a population in need of services,an analysis of the growth patterns within Collier County has been completed based on the AUIR 2016. Table 5-Projected Populations within 3.5-Mile Distance Year 2011 2016 2021 2026 Golden Gate Planning Permanent 5,405 5,471 5,490 5,509 Community Peak 6,306 6,383 6,405 6,427 Urban Estates Permanent 26,067 29,455 34,822 39,554 Planning - Community Peak 30,412 34,365 40,627 46,148 Rural Estates Permanent 3,156 3,271 3,534 3,767 Planning Community Peak 3,682 3,816 4,123 4,395 Corkscrew Planning Permanent 43 109 156 207 Community Peak 51 127 167 217 Permanent 34,671 38,306 44,002 49,037 Total: Peak 40,451 44,692 51,322 57,187 Per the BEBR medium growth rate projections, the planning communities directly impacted by the development are growing at a rate of±9.0%every 5 years. As a result, placing the County within the top ten growth rates in the state of Florida; please refer to Attachment E. Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE DAVIDSON To verify growth within the defined limits, a review of permitted zoning rights and available properties has also been reviewed, specifically, the ±15.88 acre expansion area. This area is bordered by a large residential Planned Unit Development, Wolf Creek, to the west and north. Within Wolf Creek, 671 residential units have been permitted within the ±167.96-acre zoned property. To the south is Estates zoning with some undeveloped properties and properties developed with single family homes. To the west is a Commercial Planned Unit Development; Mission Hills. Mission Hills is currently 89% built out with approximately±3.73 acres of available commercial development with zoning restrictions. Also, to further promote growth within the area, transportation infrastructure within the vicinity has improved and has provided additional capacity on the adjacent roadways. Improvements include the widening of Collier Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard that have provided efficient alternative routes; both of which are arterial roads. Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DE IPA L' S4INCON N NEE EXHIBIT "U" DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com DC DAVIDSON u+urn+eeair�n EXHIBIT "U" DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST NAME OF OWNER(LOTS 1 and 2) Florida Trust Holdings, LLC,a Delaware limited liability company,as Trustee of the Vanderbilt Commons Land Trust dated 8/1/16 Percentage of Ownership: 100% Sole Member of Florida Trust Holdings, LLC: Sam Saad III Trust beneficiaries of the Vanderbilt Commons Land Trust: • Welsh Sponsor, LLC—George Vukobratovich 100%ownership • Richardson Holdings of Naples, LLC—Melody Richardson 100%ownership • TG Vander FL, LLC—Todd Green 100%ownership • Millie&Susan Investments, LLC—Susan Vukobratovich 100%ownership NAME OF OWNER(LOTS 3,5,6) Vanderbilt Commons, LLC Percentage of Ownership—100% List of Owning Entities &Officers of Vanderbilt Commons, LLC: • VC Investor, LLC-33.33%-Ownership of Vanderbilt Commons, LLC -Ralph Cioffi 50%ownership of VC Investor, LLC -Fred Pezeshkan 50%ownership of VC Investor, LLC • SMS-USA Holdings, LLC-33.33%-Ownership of Vanderbilt Commons, LLC -Fred Benoit 100%ownership of SMS-USA Holdings, LLC • Jam Properties, Inc. -33.33%-Ownership of Vanderbilt Commons, LLC -Daniel E. Smith 100%ownership of Jam Properties, Inc. NAME OF OWNER(LOT 4) Midgard Self-Storage Naples, LLC Percentage of Ownership- 100% List of Owning Entities of Midgard Self-Storage Naples, LLC: • East Property Management, LLC-25%owner of Midgard Self-Storage Naples, LLC - Kim Pegula, President 100%ownership of East Property Management, LLC • Reliant Property Management, LLC-41.25%owner of Midgard Self-Storage Naples, LLC Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA-PL20150002167/CP-2015-2 January 2017 DIE DAVIDSON - Lewis Pollack, Manager 50%ownership of Reliant Property Management, LLC - Todd Allen, Manager 50%ownership of Reliant Property Management, LLC • Midgard I, LLC(33.75%owner of Midgard Self-Storage Naples, LLC - Ralph Cioffi, Manger 100%owner of Midgard I, LLC NAME OF OWNER(TRACTS A, B and C) Vanderbilt Commons Owner's Association, Inc. Percentage of Ownership- 100% c/o Welsh Companies FL, Inc. 2950 Tamiami Trail North,Suite 200 Naples, FL 34103 List of Officers of Vanderbilt Commons Owner's Association, Inc. • Ralph Cioffi, President-50%ownership of Vanderbilt Commons Owner's Association, Inc. • George Vukobratovich, Vice President-50%ownership of Vanderbilt Commons Owner's Association, Inc. Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA-PL20150002167/CP-2015-2 January 2017 DE DAVIDSON ENGINEERING EXHIBIT "V" PLANNING COMMUNITIES MAP Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 203 6 www.davidsonengineering.com Z:1Active ProjectslV\Vanderbilt Commons\DWGIPlanning\GISIGMPA\2016-02-04 VC GMPA-EXHIBIT V(PLANNING COMM.(.mxd N LEGEND W L --VANDERBILT BEACH RD./COLLIER BLVD. COMM.SUBDISTRICT(EXP.AREA 15.88 AC) L!3.5 MILE RADIUS S ®North Naples -Urban Estates -Central Naples -Golden Gate Rural Estates ,;t -Corkscrew 3.5 MILES ,, • Corkscrew ( ��► ' `.�,, � } \ ��I x •♦ 11 #' t , a `` • • _: '' , I: I . . ,. • IMMOKALEE RD/GR 846 IMMO LEE RD/CR 846 � - 1 Ci 1/4 1 North pl/apl �� A` / m \ 0 12 Urban Estates 1 I I \\ ....A.I _ ::1 ,� ' VANDERBILT BEACH RI I my I I I i co Q I 1 , I I _L� to les / i — - GOLDEN GATE BL D / %` a -r 0 m — LU • `' -I __ / CC Q WHITE BLVD / H LLJ ` - PINE RIDGE RD / _ 0 '.Zic w. J I‘ 0 1- 0 •• CO _ .0 co CL ••♦ w — Q i E _, I c, I- GREEN BLVD 0 �� I a 16TH AVE.SW cn _ C9 m '►i �I J Q. ■ 'rOader t, - E m -."-:<-\...p.-\- L-./ . ---- ..-<-A — 0 1 SV: 2 al Naples' ..�.�. 1t I I I(E r SQURCES:ICOLLIER(COUNTY GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION'SYSTEMS(2016) , 111---`-- __ ---. z[I l l t"' 1 1 1 1 1 1 � ---- AVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC. VANDERBILT BEACH RD. / COLLIER BLVD. DE4365 RADIO ROAD,SUITE 201 COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GMPA NAPLES, FL 34104 DAVIDSON PHONE: 239-434-6060 EXHIBIT V: PLANNING COMMUNITIES DE DAV IDSON rra c.irarrw�rrc EXHIBIT "W" EXISTING LAND USE MAP Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com cn _ � '. .i s \ =1111 IIII I I IIIHIIIltlllllll z- o , al►///nmuiuuN/i` ►IIIINif� _ li S a _ `��,,�� HE-ITAG�DIIIIIIIIIilllqm- Illllll — ♦ ♦ .. amy (` HIRI�IHII�I/� ._ 'tr'3' sir _� - .. �_♦ GREENS PAm10071 r „� a. C IS 11z� -� ---r e1 ' ----- IIIII �/� - = n'♦ +. _ _____=___=�) (RESIDENTIAL) 2 D w D O `\� �/ �IIII�fi% miD`�� G ��,I ....-._ --. ,ttttr .m ■. .n$rnIUlun 1►I o r xi< _- r :, ;' o<o `G�''i/1111 - ■ u�u Z� IMu �_ N y o co m -- -m '��j z D� /V///IAlll i i - = I/1��1t/��O .n D.:0 in.. Z1II'!W A xz -c ;r 1 MII/////// ��'c NIIIIIIII nl Ill - atimi ( .5°11 v!//// C __ _ o DmZ � 111111111 IIII IIII D+nw T _- �` � t 1 a0 /omej/ - , - mo 1_O r 7m 0 �. � � � � O �tt rnm .y. - cn D _ -0 ._ . T � O I n cn mO -0 — g m c - W o r z:-Li , mm m m M v,o: . 1 iimi 03, o0 1I/ m . 0 i 8 -0 , _� �, = rte o� ."`'` to c D y m fn I 73 _J,.:, PRISTINE DRIVES" v . s z - I- v n LJ NE T �ea I- ��1dulu 1111111 bi q --m v 0`° M D O �':T IIIP°15AN IIII \ o 73 I' ` c . . m m �a 0xCO m = 730 mem =zc ���^ ° -moi= zv.g -� " m T,e i m N°o m"zr� = O'D m �`. I cn � D 72 M mr ♦('�:- - -13 l IltiUlll\ `<`z < nv o Ow3 n ,- OaVP v m ��1� � ILL'Sy�y� — a,.. ., m .� u O c, � � r 7 Illmllln' _ " O Oa S III IIA IIO IV z,m'-a- a " m D r - -rn A3 D 1zL ter, D �� 3 3x � � n =" C D � D�: j:. �+.D i0 $ p�� m+mz0 , Ox 3... '_ 11 iliffill�\M �oim= z " m,0 c �: r c" ";! ! 1 2 5 = Z _ r ». n - �1IIIHIIIINI! �I�olrlrg..� e . "� X - III � COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R.951)' CO -. —COLLIER-BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) �.- , fl I g ° ,.._ ....m.mimmmii z a z c� b�ry`�� m - I I I ) i, m ' 'C;� D ) ��• co 1 1 o I - < cn:c ir c ;� m m — ra, ° ( r of ��. m:��'A° 1 T jii in ,,,r1 lr), 0 R .,.u u) 11111 co m 1 c� ztuiIIIIIIIIio o + CO ` �-- O 1 xi D = y r _-- 0 i O ,: .c v == z ler E- R-.7° 0 E ---- 1 0 1tor 4: Rl r 11111.11i111111--- " ` - O m W AM t i rem, I ...�... .D'0t I_ :Ori , o I , - c---1 z li m C D4. z W - 1 mlc-i, I - a, o I— 1111 _� -mac ✓ mc 0 ? � moA- v 1 r- m 7 y v 1 a4 c r� • Z m mr mr -. DIDrD� D Z r .. p n D- b i � _ � = ZD Is Cn b - c �+ m'-k. •' a`!esi o m 1� -< �t o le t� y m e I Q°� ttt 111111_,P4he1���ttt►� is ,Y r co y m z I i tt Mini •,� E c - yi, 77-1-7-7-777-1- " � cr r .D- D.. - D :N D._ !}i I ; -D D a / 0AGRICULTURAL O I 0 c Z Z z D _i z m 111z D r" (UNDEVELOPED) o 0 G ZG G pO, v p<mG� - 3 v k m m tJi c 0 I ___ m JJL n 87,r y 3d Fs. v - I m < C 1 ml ! mOGai m0� 0 � '�, . �tnI i , , _ ,,, .. , o i9 <np� O ° 4? D 14 3 xi � 1 c r �m-Zi2 D.)yt, D c o a igin rim --1 0 I r 4 r r m D D z m YI _ _A Z D OT c cn Z m D 73 X n Z z <z o Z 0 -I n n m �' 3 Z m c cm/s rc- rc- fll ,- 0 ,gyp m $` �', y o f!> cn p ., , r E lJ a - m Z -0 DJ p Fj - D OD .! D x = r D D Z m ' ',g6=.' o o 0 o a a �r "� r c� . y u Z r r x o 0 `� o fD - -n r-c m m Z �, + mrC� Z m m O Q n 0 myc� x - m r 0 CO Z o C R. o C p F C m II . 5o c _Z =Z Zo m m < m .„., - �; mI O 0 1AMHO- I ° m z D AGRICULTURAL m z H MOBILE HOME cn OVERLAY 2 DE pAVIDSON NGINff giNG C EXHIBIT "X" FUTURE LAND USE MAP C Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict GMPA November 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com I I II ,` A`d10 ► J Q 3WQH 3�180W ` ►\I' 8 _ w U ,v,.iln.121bv z � w > 0W Z 'oHwb \ ll o0 I— w =wre I H WOa � (n WZ m � J W CC 7 J Q U 0 0 Q JQ LL a ` \a\ w h z ry — — > w & act Q - cn m w xco \ 1- reI— �aZ ...1M ` J0 -J m J J w CC W D Jm JaJ0 `\ nOVO-1 LCCL 'cs,co L. H!:II!JW SG CS. 0' o �a °CL2 S . MI 1- ' < i iiiii I B o -�"� g LL Ill II { i ill - 11- J ... � h1213 a ---Q d On a' §`,.. n N Q m'y Q l~W a i` NNW\r.6O W ,_ pNC7y. i_rF JwcF J��F �Za� ` U�>' `Q' .J Z >RZ\], Z O W W\' I IC9:�O�� �-.' c1Qw evaw UIQ, ww' O,° Z . <...(k. :``,► `Q V w E U c7 v a o�� COo in\o Lu ��o.mIk‘a+w w z a >D• I I 111111 Q fll Silk., 1 kb. Q��a`U vQ'U %L.,' Q. ��`. .� LL 11 11111 11111 U) (Li Lu\+- ILI I E PI Q ���oo�w a,?N� Das re IA\� a Hp' c kill . • \` wE� �� �w a ,- J OSJkQ IT j -J �j '. m W`� j z a �I\, ° w °�LL�U'W V>\V >.: r G' >Kz II%V WU O W Ui!>cV W\-.W ��w u W, \ . W p -11: 11011116. 0<o wwaw "W��" ° C9 ° O :Il -. -ONN ¢ W z �•o z OQ�Z a'Z a'z — oilIa n3aNN �,� ' ? �-1 J > i g > l`d2inl�n�RlJd=d \a- , a I _ a a' moi. 1> y . . „� Wil'-=� v -- 5 1M r v Q „Luc;` iiii�-iiii'i�.iiil�-i+il I I " ,NN -- ce ^ "L L1 i= :' 11111111 -I Li Q U > mi '''�11 MIL �� �� V.'�111 �111_♦1 — 0 J G W N 11--,--at =MIN III R. o •:I 1��a J W 2 CO Ii ■ 1 MI Q U Wuj • ZQ WU �w o Mw ' ° � co � J W s 1--piii 1.11111111111 Z-0 � 03 Ce Cil-*CI O a -_- J o Q --_ ' IL ��Q 1- L'" _U _ 0 r4 . aCL LI- J J p, LL —m — Z 8 ; z -Irl k ui %�� z __w(IIII_= = H ►iq�i4 ,�� N Ea = _ am za z�x = _ I - • a � iprt.� ° e 2-.U)111115. I �� zDw0 = v 0-, rC11111111 ,,,111111► '2��' ° � IIII _ Y`a 111111111111 m _' U 'm ■IP I �= LL 7 a = a � I11 ■ WW ... O LI E2 LL.1 iit co i un��.i ..ql, `�q� co_ - = a• z , mm m n ° Q a - Q (I-56 'go)audn3-Ino®a3M03 all (�5s b�)-a�dn3inos=�l3171 J Q _I nml i ulmulue a ° a ZII ° ■ IH 11111111.111111 H _ 1 > '/ a IIIINIIII I _ 1 0 . a.2 �' �_ �E= IiI�INII N o I J ° w w w�° SolllN!'n�= � aOV� = o I r -_- ao a � �� Haag ° -� = ° v v . ;aAI m11111.11111.1111111 I —iii �� o7'...1 -- o, _J F= F- CL re ' cu NI nw mw� _�INIIIIIIIf111111111 �.ao )<�� Ww arIMIIIIa'Q cn w I a >O .\IIIIIIiII 111=,ZSW p�u� >O 2 No — w m(wis pwCI ° i- U =_ -z_-- WW Ua � W fj •14 c~i> a I w -"^"-- 1--1 s=, 111 � a_ _ r re Mil Q -- m ° 111111E6 �110 � 2LL = LL J � ` O _ ! 5 � EMUS (' LU a 1:L; iti oIm♦ :pi!' Wyk lig wIN o- 3/�IMO 3NIlSRld°° �r11/: L TW �I\ I I 1��I,_(�-- { Y"W O Q ��YJWLLa'I-:3Z _ ` O1 -i•t., Q_IU" ,1 ° Wm; wz �w0-Zi W Uimmi im 1 z ���I. � am IL XW z - . °io NMNM Ww aiI 11LLW ILI � � � eftd Q cissi a( El � > w YUWi JOv O � � � ° � ?Nw MIOff. WW � a ° ar �'1tn ��v. v . w a �_ * - %, 0 w mi .i .w a CC-a1:11 YwiOQ €; w Ow z�. a. 111. 20 Q _ �. //ll }' - c� o a 1111111 1111 ISI : Iil�j :111111 w m,� J 1s��♦1��11 1► W J a .. I I///////1 `° z°o o w na - IIII li'� IIIH a - ////l///lllllllllll I o J Z r, v za IN I. ,a� I a rJ i Z-U- 111111 II— . YF N. ,�— owW ill it oI. IIINI/1/ a'z� . U)Q(.6 .. u�/1�� �� 1MID 0 N. . /iii ;. W., ■�� 1_ - z iss �� �- ��� ■ ■ 1Ell Illi l►pj��\ Z;-, �/ 111,{ I ' 7ev�, to o z ,__] 1 I 1 11111• r/Pei Oe - /I u I1 �_,= s__ - _ E ti...... _ `� v ��/ 11111 -_ \� �� w W hdI1NaIS3b) I J 9 �_ MU4 1/�w 4ndiSN3321J - 4 *V r3'j W. MI _ `/4�I►IMIN/ ± - -� -z ' 111111111111 ,,, . ,., „� -' = ... � 111111 `:.�: >� 3jy11213H �11\ a a ei. = !WHO �`//HIIIIIIIIII///I/IIN IIIIIIIII IlNill 1 11111 I11►� ^ 11���``��� ,1, G- `:, . :� ow PETITIONS LETTERS OF OBJECTION P L20150002167/C P-2015-2 (Adoption Companion PUDZ-PL20150002166) VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD AND COLLIER BLVD. (CR951) COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT GMP TRANSMITTAL AMENDMENT PETITION TO REQUEST CHANGES TO RE-SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION FOR CHANGE TO CAROLINA VILLAGES MPUD. THE FOLLOWING PETITION IS BEING SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF THE RESIDENTS OF BLACK BEAR RIDGE, LOCATED IN THE WOLF CREEK PUD OF COLLIER COUNTY, NAPLES, FL. THE FOLLOWING RESIDENTS HERE BY STATE THIER OBJECTIONS AND REQUESTED CHANGES/ADDITIONS TO THE SUBMITTED RE- SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION FOR CHANGES TO MPUD PRESENTLY KNOWN AS CAROLINA VILLAGES (VANDERBILT COMMONS) 1. Density remain at the existing 150,000 sq. ft. gross of leasable floor area of commercial land use. As detailed in Item 1 of letter submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planing and attached here to as Exhibit 1 2. Business types be prohibited as described in Item 2 of Exhibit 1 3. Buffering against north property line needs to be revised to increase the amount of landscaping to diffuse automotive lights and sound as detailed in Item 4 of Exhibit 1 4. Address the impact of traffic with regard to drive thru type business being proposed and increase traffic with density change as detailed in Exhibit 1 Item 2 ,5 and exhibits A, B, C 5., Specify the restrictions that would apply to unplanned developed portion of the 2 parcels located in the north east corner both current and future land use. Exhibit 1 Item 6. OPA. 9 ACORN WAY _CV 7/2/-. --73y-, ACORN WAY ( December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties, These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2, BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink, Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. 0 Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUO. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is beim considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing wi h no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: a — Z-S ..130A-c, Name: Please Print Lt Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 € v . . R11 ;'; s • Ilk fc',:i1".:'r'• .'•• T. :,..,,,....„,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,r. :,.,,,„:::-.1%41,41,17 ..,,,j 1 ''.:•.' ' ' --7—' --irliamsam '-'.. Atag..4.,.!,,,,i.,...4.::„..,...,...•„iv..!:.• re.••. 7„.... ...,, „.„...., ,...„, _ ,..,..,... :,. , . 0,,,,,,..•,„ . a% .,.:„,„ .:. , , i ., in I ON •. ,- - - ! ,. ii:- ,:,..,::,:. , 1 ..•: 7 ik,,,,,.,::i v,,,,,,zi a„„; If.,, „; ,,„›..:.,,,! i,:.,....„ , ,,.:„, .1 0. ..ii ..A ,...., .... , : l'i"*"`' 1 . 4 a 'I ...., ,74:::::•::::,:,,I.: *. is:,..,, . ,,,, 7 : z.....77.„....1,410... , 1 E i. i.I t'.'''':i alli , • i •. •• ••. ,,i, ,,,,, ,..,- i •1,,• ,.r ,0 :.... , , . ,„... n.... r il,t,,, ! .:„.,., : 2 i i„,.•,,,,,,....„.::::,.....,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,,,f; „:„....1..,:.,..:,,,,,,_ „............,,,. _,-:...... ::,:..!:, r. ,. , ,..,....... ,„:.......:,,,,,,,,,.......,, ,....,... ..,......, ,..., „.„:„ .,,,,,,,,,2,:....,...,......•.•-...f...::i. .........,'.:„...,...:. 3 A er,� ,.. „< 1 Was this review 141 13 t 13 ® Useful 4 e Funny (! ) Cool DOD 1/2/2016 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ?„,;lot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! s sat in t e drive up • lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car strugg e to get backed out_pfth2j : 251L. Second for a drive up it was extremely slowjhird my loTg-Ter pet peeve is e ern s were mase sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue._ lll give it sometime before I stop back. W*9 Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? ,....Fi,./.* gge ' "'II""Y ,...1.,i,61 1 f...... 70/ 4- , .. El% j. I 13 r ('-- 0 DODD 9/3/2016 Atiti checK-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines. location for coffee and bagelsinand breakfast sandwiches. line in the lobb waitin t-There were 32 customers orderfoodat *: . A Y on a Satur.day±'norninher.etw°ere 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a ve so sular coffee _ shop. • .,10;,, kg; 74:1.''' "-4.‘edl..:‘*'-. '''''-,7r-,..: ;; r t.A.Z- ' ' :St CARIBOUO thi cc. IINSTIf 4 .......... COFFEE BAG' E LS ()RIVE THRti 7 . q''* :"..' •,`'. ;,.. '41;04;'1:: 1 0' '" 'tlfrf'•-,,,,,, e.,..~..A., , ,, • '','" , I 11 g g ' - $0 , 0 416 • 4° f ' ' :7:: ' . ,,%4/:/1' * * PETITION TO REQUEST CHANGES TO RE-SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION FOR CHANGE TO CAROLINA VILLAGES MPUD, THE FOLLOWING PETITION IS BEING SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF THE RESIDENTS OF BLACK BEAR RIDGE, LOCATED IN THE WOLF CREEK PUD OF COLLIER COUNTY, NAPLES, FL. THE FOLLOWING RESIDENTS HERBY STATE THIER OBJECTIONS AND REQUESTED CHANGES/ADDITIONS TO THE SUBMITTED RE- SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION FOR CHANGES TO MPUD PRESENTLY KNOWN AS CAROLINA VILLAGES (VANDERBILT COMMONS) 1. Density remain at the existing 150,000 sq. ft. gross of leasable floor area of commercial land use. As detailed in Item 1 of letter submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planing and attached here to as Exhibit 1 2. Business types be prohibited as described in Item 2 of Exhibit 1 3. Buffering against north property line needs to be revised to increase the amount of landscaping to diffuse automotive lights and sound as detailed in Item 4 of Exhibit 1 4. Address the impact of traffic with regard to drive thru type business being proposed and increase traffic with density change as detailed in Exhibit 1 Item 2 ,5 and exhibits A, B, C 5. Specify the restrictions that would apply to unplanned developed portion of the 2 parcels located in the north east corner both current and future land use. Exhibit 1 Item 6. 737 ? ACORN WAY 7391 ACORN ' � '' -: --'`�_ WAY / ' i - /7 Lag."1 z` z" L... ,cliteACORN WAY T-7„..}..)LA nft, 4 -i4,,0- . ACORN WAY ...4,,,,_eik /7;:d-e_41 ACORN WAY 77) 7'36 SCM. ACORN WAY 94fIALLO ' ' Mit__ ACORN WAY iStI JJSk # ' .r/c: ..ACORN WAY % 1A (-7 --6,'/) ° 735 ACORN WAY k O j -i40 ',,,,e,* ACORN WAY La„, ' 31,-.LA e, 4--- k.s..)\-1\-kAlc--Q- 7 ACORN WAY 6 i „ti, 7 -.,.." /' i72s/ ACORN WAY 70-(/' 1 72-C7 ACORN WAY i he- iti to ACORN WAY k...--- ` „)\-t--` . Wil_ .,.. i` ..: ACORN WAY 7 ACORN WAY tit"' 4S- f 72 '.f ACORN WAY ,) \\ r \\ J d5 ACORN WAY (? J ,- ` . <� , ACORN WAY a - f / .7z PL'''' ''' '- ACORN WAY at_.--fiii--1 bc� 79-13 ACORN WAY r, 7 ,? ( .--, -'' .... ACORN WAY 1 ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ,S't 61CA -110,16- --Xt" 7 '7?6;'• ACORN WAY 4--. 7)1: 1 73 73Sr 6 ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY i ACORN WAY _ - .7\......„/ ,e) 702ACORN WAY \iACORN WAY ad illi ACORN WAY ..„/ 4 6,- ' i'---) — 73 1/ ACORN WAY '73 1 \,ACORN WAY 1-63(7-AcORN WAY L- . t. . c 0 ' 735ORNWAY 1 1 0 76P ACORN WAY 4111W -,4k,S .7(,),:--76r ACORN WAY f ? UCORN WAY i o LA Vde, j , � :� /IrDORN WAY NT---ti.e-r---? -- A.. ., i.to I RN WAY C) 7t-1-7/ ACORN WAY ‘N C"::- �`�` - .,,O.0(->\---(11,r-,„ ACORN WAY ) LA jij 135 ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY SiewiArzieE / 73 'ACORN WAY 3 7.5$ 5 ACORN WAY 15$ X/1 ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY AL- /1/11.1 7 .-. ! 7ACOR N WAY .,,„ r-i"-"I 7 /7 7 ' ACORN WAY iff :( itil-(-11--(__ 13 9ef ACORN WAY A_ p -3? -7 ACORN WAY if timk,„, 733y ACORN WAY ....1" ..k, i,,.4..- ' ACORN WAY - . ACORN WAY , el ii**---------'--,,, \,,,,c' sth,,,i,,,,, / ACORN WAY alAtii--"' ' (------------ ! ,4,6.ACORN WAY r\-f-' -_ ®. --)d,.(-1 ACORN WAY tits il j`'�r`\,.. ` 1 " ACORN WAY ACORN WAY , �,,'f,,' 'ZS L. ACORN WAY T t'q,t*tACORN WAY ‘71":1;71/141"7W..--A-1 1 ' ACORN WAY 3 3 4-7 ACORN WAY k 2„..... `L . .t th .J -7441 ACORN WAY y} ,., f C Z,1, 71 ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY ACORN WAY - ACORN WAY ACORN WAY A. ..---7-- k _, 7 3 /l ACORN WAY iiiik 73 • c ACORN WAY 74 'A I I I I I PO'" .4 0,. /1,„411‘.,,,, ' // r2----4 ACORN WAY 9, 7 73 ACORN WAY c... 1. 11_441f- 7„1. °3 ACORN WAY 5v4— —720.c. ACORN WAY 1 ���/ i 1 �'�-� ACORN WAY , ` 72 /3 ACORN WAY / / i 7 3 ,s7 r�' ACORN WAY '"A71 '/ I ACORN WAY / ' 7 2 q ACORN WAY { 7Z, f q ACORN WAY ACORN WAY 0 ./A/U.44,,---4A- /6,-.4.6c---- 7e q l ACORN WAY /11 l , 73 / g ACORN WAY o' I /j i ,./...4 / ACORN WAY , / �J ,�'`(1c,S ACORN WAY , ,^...44- 671--d/1,-- .7c: 'd ACORN WAY E 73 2 ACORN WAY i, / - l cg, ACORNWAY �— 1's ACORN WAY )1Ippw. p--if A - _ . .,�1533--- 2f ACORN WAY VAL # 4. .4+ _ t y ACORN WAY j, ife " . ACORN WAY 4 ACORN WAY ,.....- Lv-Cq Stk,( ra.., 7 2-6i K .,,,)O\P &-A.r..-1 ACORN WAY . (Nt-Al...,c 1213 ACORN WAY l'-ok-cc 6, _.,U., c 1)A-. 3 ACORN WAY 2 > Cr _ ACORN WAY , M t ACORN WAY * 72\--01,-Th y ACORN WAY T-13 0 ACORN WAY _ ,.....-'- * ACORN WAY 9- - 72 ACORN WAY . ,4 , t ...„4?‘41,-e-e-1,,,ct,„... ACORN WAY fp , -�-- , ?/y#/ ACORN WAY i A �,; 1:,,r6"3 .,,,2r -c.11\ 1 7 1, 6 7 ACORN WAY -VA,.40e04.1-442!/- 4414, 72 '7 ACORN WAY aim _ `' `.2 87 ACORN WAY 0„...it, 4”. < ACORN WAY illlr - ACORN WAY ilk Law,--1. ACORN WAY X fin `7 ACORN WAY t " "ck t'"°('t ACORN WAY 736-SF' ACORN WAY 6, r . ter*-.'"_. 7353-- ACORN WAY ACORN WAY CACORN WAY 0 I /'0-4-7 ORN WAY 7C-; ('''7 s Y } Z:;,A•ii, : COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 111109 MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Er_eaeischl@colliergovnet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Qorbyschmiclt@colliergov,nat • 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, First let me say that I approve of the Vanderbilt Commons being developed according the the original concept that was approved by the county,' i.e., an MPUD with a pedestrian friendly atmosphere with services that would supplement those already available and enhance the neighborhood. I oppose and do not approve of the above proposal which would increase the available leasable space by one third. I am concerned about detrimental effects such as increased traffic and congestion, noise and pollution and an overall degradation of the living conditions in the neighborhood. Additional buffering between the development and BBF? to mitigate these effects would be desirable. It would not be desirable to have a drive through establishment of any type, which would be a duplication of services already available at Mission Hills and would exacerbate traffic, congestion etc. Granting an increase in leasable space increased the commercial density to that twice that of the adjacent full commercial PUD, as the 200,000 sf would be in half the acreage, this would serve the developer, not the residents. Thank you for your consideration, 4- Rc.c. cir) Lu -7 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Ere_ciReischl@collierwynet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT. AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmicolliergov.ul , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, As a resident of Black Bear Ridge, I oppose the above amendment and request for an additional 50,000 sf of leasable space. This accrues to the benefit of the developer while providing little benefit to neighboring property owners. I am concerned about increased noise, traffic, congestion and an overall adverse impact on quality of life, as well as a possible negative effect upon property values. Adding 50,000 sf increases the total square footage of leasable space to 200.000 sf which is comparable to the maximum allowed in the Mission Hills commercial development which is adjacent, while placing it in half of the acreage. This is too dense and is not consistent with a pedestrian friendly MPUD that was approved as a buffer between a full commercial PUD and neighboring residential areas. Development of the property as originally approved would provide desired services and enhance the area. We do not need another drive through or drive up establishment of any kind, which would be a duplication of services already available at Mission Hills. As opposed to an increase of square footage, an increase in buffer between the development and BBR would be good to mitigate noise, headlights etc. No for this amendment. Thank you for y. r consideration, : , apprall.1111111k ,,Arie "II Allp — i COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION ‘imme MR. FRED REISCHI,AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division corbyschmidtecoiliergov.net , 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr.. Naples, FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt. /am not if favor of the above proposal and oppose its'approval. The original Carolina Commons MPUD was planned and approved as a pedestrian friendly MPUD which would provide needed services that would enhance the quality of life. Increasing the gross leasable space to 200,000 sf results in a density twice that of the adjacent full commercial Mission Hills district, which has more than twice the acreage. I am concerned about negative impacts such as increased congestion, noise, traffic and stray light from vehicles shining into the backs of the adjoining Black Bear Ridge homes that abut the development, in which I reside. This increase, if approved would constitute a special benefit to the developer, to the detriment of the adjoining homeowners. I would also point out that the proposed buffer along the northern aspect of the proposed development appears to be inadequate for mitigation of negative impacts, it should be increased. Also, I understand that the developer has been proposing a fast food with drive through establishment which is currently prohibited by the Carolina Commons ordinance. I would be opposed to any drive through or drive up variant which would exacerbate all negative effects. In addition, it would be a redundant service as one already exists in the adjacent Mission Hills CPUD. Thank you for your consideration, TS'S Ar-ocn U6Ctil Ci/ CT . y la/ i(e Pul(c., COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division FredReischlgoolltergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division corbyschmiciff„colltergoymei , 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, Hive in Black Bear Ridge, which is adjacent to the above subdistrict. I oppose the proposed amendment to increase the leasable space in the subdistrict. Any increase would exacerbate negative impacts on our neighborhood such as congestion, traffic, and noise and would diminish the quality of life. This would be a special benefit solely to the developer. It should not be approved. There is also, I think, an inadequate buffer proposed along the northern aspect of the project that would do little to mitigate any negative impacts, particularly noise and stray lights from vehicles. The buffer requirements should be increased. I have heard that the developer is proposing a drive through establishment. I would be opposed to a drive through or any variation. It is currently prohibited, thus would require an amendment and would be a redundant service, needlessly contributing to a decrease in quality of life by increasing traffic, noise and congestion; there is already a fast food drive through at Mission Hills Thank you for your consideration, it " AZzpit. 0,2. 01,1 „F-7( cov 44/11filvc ,7 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER %kw Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division Erasifteciacht@LOiltergov,flet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division co_tyschmidtCelocolliergov.net , 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, As a resident of Black Bear Ridge,which neighbors the Vanderbilt Commons project,which has applied for the amendment above, I oppose any increase in the gross leasable square footage allowed. If increased to 200,000 sf, that would equal the maximum allowable space for the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district which has twice the acreage, thereby allowing a density twice that in the full commercial district. This would be a special benefit to the developer and be detrimental to the adjoining homeowners due to negative impacts such as noise,traffic, congestion and an overall degradation of quality of life related to the increased density.There is also a concern about a negative impact upon property values. I have also heard that the developer has been proposing a drive through establishment for the development. This is currently prohibited by the county ordinance for Carolina Commons and I would oppose a drive through or any variation of one.A drive through fast food establishment is already available at Mission Hills. Carolina Commons was supposed to be a pedestrian friendly development which would provide needed services, be walk to, and enhance the neighborhood. Increasing the leasable space by one third and doubling the density as compared to the adjoining commercial district will not serve that purpose. Please do not approve this plan. In addition,the buffer area along the northern border does not seem adequate for mitigating the effects of the development upon BBR. Please consider requiring this to be appropriately increased such that it would mitigate stray light and noise. / /ae7//1/4/? Thank you for your conpideration, / 73Xr ti /// t•-• COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division Emaetachigcolliergov.nel , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division CorbyS.Qhmidt2colv.het , 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083. 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I oppose the above amendment. I live in Black Bear Ridge and am concerned that increasing the gross leasable space to 200,000 sf will serve no purpose other than allowing the developer a special benefit. An increase of this amount will result in a density twice that of the adjacent Mission Hills CPUD.This is not in keeping with the original intent of Carolina Commons, which was to act as a buffer between a commercial district, Mission Hills, and a residential district,Wolf Creek RPUD. It is also not in keeping with maintaining a pedestrian friendly environment. The area should be developed as originally planned with the intent to enhance the neighborhood, and have walk to services.That development would be welcomed. I am concerned about the negative effects of increased traffic congestion, noise and light and the possible negative impact upon property values.Also, I have heard that the developer is contemplating a drive through establishment. I am opposed to a drive through in any form. It would merely compound the negative effects and be a redundant service, as one is already available at Mission Hills. One additional concern relates to the buffer along the northern border, south of BBR.The buffer appears inadequate to have any real effect on mitigating noise, stray light from vehicles or any other negative effect. Please consider increasing the buffer. Thank yy for your consideration, -6 /CO fC-t7e 64/A--iD 730 74e ,eAl LA4fr COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division FredReischl@colltergovael , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division ccans,Cbilfildt*colliergov net , 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr , Naples. FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520.25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, This amendment if approved would increase the leasable space in Vanderbilt Commons to a density twice that of the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district, which has more than twice the acreage. This does not seem to be in keeping with the original design and plan for Carolina Commons as a buffer between residential and commercial areas. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge, I am opposed to this increase in leasable space as I am concerned about the negative effects of increased traffic congestion, noise, nighttime light and possibly a negative impact upon property values. It would seem that an increase would be of special benefit to the developer and not the adjoining property owners. The area should he developed according to the original plan, providing walk to services that would enhance the neighborhood and exist in a pedestrian friendly atmosphere.Adding more space would not help this.Also the buffer along the northern border seems inadequate for mitigation of any negative impacts. Please consider requiring a denser buffer that could diminish noise and stray light. I have also heard that the developer has proposed a drive through establishment. I oppose that in any form as it would certainly exacerbate any negative effects, particularly traffic congestion, noise and stray light. We already have a drive through fast food establishment available at Mission Hills. Respectfully, t- 4.* Ltik\ _ 0 I.Ce- COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI,AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division Heschl zi) li-ryov.nel , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division corbyschrnicit€Pcolliergoy,net 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I oppose the above amendment increasing the leasable space by one third to 200,000 square feet. I live in Black Bear Ridge, which abuts the Vanderbilt Commons development and am concerned about the problems associated with an increase, such as, increased traffic congestion, noise, and an overall degradation of quality of fife. The density would be twice that of the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district which has twice the acreage, if approved. It would appear to be of special benefit to the developer and not to the surrounding landowners. Also, there is the concern for a negative impact upon property values if the commercial density is so high. The original Carolina Commons was supposed to be a buffer between commercial and residential developments. It was supposed to be pedestrian friendly and provide services that would enhance the neighborhood and be "walk to". An increase in leasable space to 200,000 will not help in achieving that goal, it will merely help the developer I have also heard that a drive through operation has been proposed. I oppose that in any form as it would merely worsen any negative impacts. Please go with the original plan. We already have a drive through at Mission Hills. In addition, please consider requiring a better buffer along the northern aspect of Vanderbilt Commons as the proposed buffer appears too 'thin"to provide any mitigation of noise, vehicular headlight stray light or any other negative impact. Respectfully, ',Crititet- , ri/h1L 72C7 iikarn Way, • ,•• ••••-•-• • •-• •• COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION Cr MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division EresiRetS.014CalliergOY_ne.1 , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division wrbyachmktt@colliergovnet , 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt. The proposed increase in gross leasable space is not agreeable to me. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I oppose the amendment as I am concerned that it would result in a decrease in quality of life due to increased traffic congestion and noise. Nighttime stray light shining into the BBR development would also be a negative as well Cr. as a possible negative impact upon property values due to the negative effects. The area should be developed according to the original plan. Increasing the leasable space to a point where the density is twice that of the Mission Hills commercial district will not help in providing a pedestrian friendly environment with walk to services. It would seem to benefit the developer to the detriment of adjacent property owners. Please do not approve this plan. We have been informed that the developer has proposed a drive through establishment. I would be opposed to that in any form as it would worsen any negative effects and not provide a service that is already present at Mission Hills. In addition, please consider requiring an increase in density of the buffer along the northern aspect, as the proposed buffer seems little more than a thin line of trees that will do little to mitigate any noise or diminish stray light from vehicle headlights from shining into the backs of adjoining houses in BBR Sincerely s-t acory) (v COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR FRED REISCHI,AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division FredReischl@collierqov net 239-252-4211 MR CORBY SCHMIDT.AICP. PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division corbyschmidtcolliergovnet , 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples. FL 34104 RE Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, Increasing the allowable leasable space to be increased by one third to a level where it equals the maximum allowable square footage in the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district, which has more than twice the acreage, does not seem to be in keeping with the original plan for Carolina Commons to be developed and act as buffer between the full commercial Mission Hills and residential Wolf Creek PUD. The area was supposed to be developed to be pedestrian friendly and to enhance the neighborhood. Increasing the leasable space would not seem to serve that goal and Alilk would seemingly be of special benefit to the developer and not to the neighborhood. I live in Black Bear Ridge, which abuts the Vanderbilt Commons and am concerned about negative impacts such as increased noise and traffic congestion as well as a possible negative effect upon property values. I have heard that the developer has proposed a drive through establishment. 1 would be opposed to a drive through of any form as it would likely worsen any negative effects without providing added benefits and there is also a drive through fast food place in Mission Hills. We do riot need another I also see that there is a buffer proposed along the northern border. It does not seem sufficient to mitigate negative effects of noise, nor that from night time headlights shining into the backs of BBR houses. Please consider requiring an increase in density of the buffer. erely, 111, sew COW COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION *.m. MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Fredig.12colliergo_vitet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergoVnel , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I live in Black Bear Ridge and am opposed to the proposed increase in leasable space by one third. The increase would result in a density twice that of the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district. I am concerned about increase traffic, congestion, noise and other negative impacts. I think there should be increased buffering between the development and Black Bear Ridge. I am also concerned that my home value may be negatively affected. I am against any fast food restaurants with drive throughs or any variation of that. There already is that service in Mission Hills. Sincerely, 4111 t ( 7I)sr7 aenrA - ---- F....._ j-.Z 2 V 7 1 / •4 o , •"' / C COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR, FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Frecifielschoorwrgvvd)Qt , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergovnet 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I live in Black Bear Ridge and oppose the above amendment. It would seem to grant a special benefit to the developer to the detriment of adjacent landowners. Specifically, I am concerned about a decrease in quality of life due to increased traffic, congestion, noise, pollution, etc., not to mention a possible negative effect upon property values due to those effects making the area less desirable. Increasing the leasable space to 200,000 sf would equal the maximum square footage allowed in the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district, which has more than twice the acreage. An increase to that density is not in keeping with the aesthetics of the neighborhood. I would favor developing the area as originally planned, with a pedestrian friendly environment providing services that would enhance the community. Another drive through establishment of any type or any variation would not be desirable. More buffering to mitigate negative impacts would be beneficial Sincerely, -66)4(k 7. 87 1Lkr1,) COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 -•. ' I b),coliel..gol , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples. FL 34104 in , a) •I -r,•vr , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 2552560052 0,2 550,2(56 00546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, As a resident of Black Bear Ridge, I oppose the above amendment. I am concerned about problems related to increased congestion and traffic, noise and possibly a negative impact on my property value. I am in favor of a pedestrian friendly development which was stipulated in the original MPUD, with services that will enhance the neighborhood, but not a commercial density twice that of the Mission Hills district which is across the street. And please, no fast food establishments with drive throughs, which are prohibited in the current MPUD. Sincerely, 7) , 9-714 /fr-z'ift i C COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCH1, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Eres1ReischILI,colliergovse . 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@coIliergov.net. 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers:25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I oppose the above referenced amendment application. It would increase the leasable space by one third to a total of 200,000 sf, which is equal to the maximum allowed in the adjacent full commercial Mission Hills district, while being located in less than half of the acreage. This is not in keeping with the original plan of the property being developed as a pedestrian friendly area which would act as a buffer between the full commercial district of Mission Hills and the adjacent Wolf Creek residential PUD. am concerned about a negative impact on quality of life in the neighborhood due to increased traffic, noise, pollution and congestion. I support the original plan that would offer additional services that would supplement those already available and enhance the neighborhood. I do not support another drive through or drive up facility of any type which would merely exacerbate any negative impacts. More buffering to mitigate negative impacts on the neighboring properties is something I hope you will consider. Thank you for your consideration, 9'4 1J6t. LA) " t,fbp(t) , Ct. 3(itt Ciw COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Er_e_s (.1) ergot , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 C.OrbySctiati• ra) Ii- ev,1 - , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I oppose the above amendment. The developer should be held to the original agreement and restrictions of the MPUD. A pedestrian friendly environment that provided services that enhanced and supplemented those already present would be desirable. Increasing the allowable square footage of leasable space, resulting in a density twice that of the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district would not. I am concerned about the increased traffic, noise, congestion and other deleterious effects that may result, not to mention that my property value may be negatively impacted. Sincerely, 1 - ,;--) Nor COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning& Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl(i) .11.- 'it-I, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT,A1CP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 •rb hmi. ‘ .11i-rgovnet, 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I would like to express my opposition to the above amendment application. I live in Black Bear Ridge and am concerned about a deterioration of quality of life due to increased congestion, traffic, noise and pollution. The property was originally approved 0 to be developed as a pedestrian friendly MPUD with walk to type services that would complement those already available, thus enhancing the neighborhood. I would support that type of development. Increasing the leasable space by one third to a total of 200,000 sf would seem to offering special benefit to the developer to the detriment of adjacent landowners whose property values may be negatively impacted. At 200,000 sf of leasable space the density would be twice that of the neighboring Mission Hills commercial district. That density is too great for a property that was supposed to be developed as a buffer/transition between residential and full commercial areas. I am also opposed to any drive through facility and request that you consider increasing the buffer between BBR and the development to help mitigate negative impacts. Thank you, J 1 . 1 ' Nj CriVi'l /6' 1 ) 1 / '2-3 5 / ii -- .......„,,,--3 , 0 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredfieischEtYoolliergo_v„net . 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corhyschmidt@oolbel 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I am a resident of Black Bear Ridge. I am against the above proposal. An increase in leasable space by one third, that results in a density equal to that of the adjacent Mission Hills district in half the space is not in keeping with the neighborhood. I would like to see the area developed according to the original plan with a pedestrian friendly environment, providing services not already offered, that I could walk to. I am concerned about increased congestion and traffic, noise and pollution that may occur, as well as a possible negative impact on my property value. I think there should be more of a buffer than what is proposed and am against any drive throughs or any variants of them. Sincerely, 1736Ac oin COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 EredRetscht@colliergum30_1 , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmiclt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I live in Black Bear Ridge. I oppose the above change as I am concerned about adverse effects from increased traffic, congestion, noise and a possible overall negative impact on living conditions. I would like to see the area developed as a pedestrian friendly district that I could walk to and obtain services that are not otherwise available. A fast food restaurant with a drive throughs would not be one of them. I don't think that increasing the allowable leasable square footage to a level equal to the adjacent Mission Hills PUD in an area of half the acreage is a good idea. Sincerrety,, 1 - c c-Tek..3 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI. AICP SENIOR PLANNER Planning& Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FiesiReischl0calliergov.nei , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP. PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@coffiefgov,nef, 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520.25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, Your approval of this amendment application would increase the allowable leasable space to 200,000 sf, which would be the same as the maximum allowable leasable space in the adjacent Mission Hills full commercial district. This would be on property with less than half of the acreage of Mission Hills resulting in twice the density. I oppose this amendment as I am concerned about an increased negative impact on the neighborhood due to increased traffic and congestion and increased noise and pollution. I live in Black Bear Ridge and am also concerned about a negative impact on property values as well. The property should be developed according to the original parameters, that being a pedestrian friendly atmosphere offering supplemental services that would enhance the area and to which one could walk. Increasing the leasable space would seem to be of special benefit to the developer, while offering little to adjacent landowners other than exacerbating any negative effects. I also would oppose any drive through establishments of any type or variation, which would be a duplication of services already available at Mission Hills and which are prohibited according to the ordinance approving the Carolina Commons MPUD. As an aside. I hope you will consider requiring an increase in the buffer between the development and BBR, as the current buffer seems inadequate. Respectfully, *) , S AcOvv` 7-.{«1 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischlAcolliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT. AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I am a property owner in Black Bear Ridge. which is adjacent to the above subdistrict where the amendment is requested. I am opposed to any increase in leasable square footage. If the leasable space is increased by 50,000 sf, then the 200,000 sf allowable would be equivalent to the maximum allowable space for the Mission Hills PUD which is twice as big. I am concerned about the detrimental effects of increased traffic, congestion, noise and pollution which will negatively impact living in the area. The development plan for a pedestrian friendly MPUD as originally proposed would be desirable with services that would supplement those already available at the CPUD. We do not need another drive through establishment and more buffering to mitigate noise, light etc would be beneficial. Sincerely. / • -&11 ( -C COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 EredReischl&colliergomet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergamel , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I am writing you to express my opposition to the above application for an increase in 114., gross leasable space to 200,000 sf. If approved the density would be twice that of the adjacent Mission Hills commercial PUD. Carolina Coin mons as originally approved was supposed to provide a buffer between the fill commercial Mission Hills PUD and the adjacent Wolf Creek RPUD.An increase in of the leasable square footage by one third is not consistent with the original intent. 1 am concerned about the increased congestion, traffic, noise and light pollution that will result as well as a possible negative impact upon property values. The increase would be of benefit to the developer and to the detriment of adjoining landowners.A pedestrian friendly MPUD as originally approved, which would add currently unavailable services that could be walked to would be desirable. I would oppose any form of a drive through or drive up establishment, which is already present at Mission Hills.An increase in the proposed buffer between the MPUD and Black Bear Ridge development to mitigate noise and light pollution would be desirable. Thank you for your consideration, Lt2, ..., 67 V /ci-eiMA(__ tOe COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 EredReiach_l@coThergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Q.411 I- .colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I am writing to indicate that I oppose the above application for increasing the gross leasable space to 200,000 sf I live in Black Bear Ridge and would note that an increase to this level would result in a density twice that of the adjoining Mission Hills commercial district. As the Carolina Commons was originally intended as a buffer between Mission Hills CPUD and Wolf Creek RPUD and was designated as an MPUD to be pedestrian friendly, the proposed increase would not be compatible with the original plan. Instead, an increase of leasable space would exacerbate negative effects of development, resulting in increased congestion, traffic, noise and light pollution. This may result in a negative impact upon property values.Approval of the application would be of specific benefit to the developer and not to adjoining landowners. I am not opposed to development that would bring new services to the neighborhood and enhance the quality of life. Carolina Commons was supposed to do that with a pedestrian friendly atmosphere, providing services that could be walked to. The original plan was a good one. Also, I oppose a drive through or any variation of one. It would be a redundant service as there already is one at Mission Hills and it is specifically prohibited. Regarding the proposed buffer along the northern portion of the property, it seems inadequate to mitigate noise and light pollution. Thank you, f\1\ 111\.0. 1 0 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR, FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 Etecifleischay..nei , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 cpity,sclunicil@Lc mei , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I am a resident of Black Bear Ridge. I am writing to indicate my opposition to the above amendment. I don't think it is beneficial to have the allowable square footage of leasable space increased by one third which would result in a density twice that of the adjacent commercial district of Mission Hills. I am concerned about traffic congestion, noise, pollution and a possible negative impact on my property value. I would like the area to provide pedestrian friendly added services not already provided. Sincerely, z 2/6 7 Alc-f W7 9 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischlcolliergov net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt©colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I live in Black Bear Ridge, which is adjacent to the development where the above amendment is being requested. I am opposed to an increase in the gross leasable square footage to 200,000. This a 33% increase and will result in the same allowable leasable space as in the adjacent Mission Hill PUD which has twice the acreage. I am concerned about increased congestion, traffic. noise and other negative effects, possibly including an impact on property values. The area should be developed as originally proposed to provide additional services in a pedestrian friendly environment. I think there should be more buffering than what appears to be planned between the development and Black Bear Ridge to help mitigate noise and light. I am also against any drive through or any variation of one as we already have one at Mission Hills and the effect on traffic would be undesirable. Since ely, I / tvgy COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION %woe MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 aeLRI I olliergovnel 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliecgov.nl , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I am a homeowner in Black Bear Ridge, which is adjacent to the property seeking the amendment referred to above. I am writing to express my opposition to the requested increase in leasable space to 200,000 sf, which would increase the space by one third and result in an increased density of commercial units equal to that in the adjacent Mission Hills CPUD in half the acreage. This is too much density for the area. I am concerned about negative impacts upon quality of life such as increased traffic and congestion as well as noise and light pollution. Regardless of whether the requested amendment is approved, I think that there should be a better buffer between the Vanderbilt Commons development and BBR, to mitigate negative impacts. I am also concerned about a possible negative effect upon property values. The property should be developed according to the original plan with a pedestrian friendly atmosphere, providing additional services not already available that would augment the neighborhood and improve the quality of life. I would oppose a drive through establishment in any form; it would be a redundant service as one already exists at Mission Hills, Respectfully Ak)LAA- u_/ _& 721 SikAVL&-- 72 9 , "") • CI COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredRmcfil@colfiergo_v..net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr.. Naples, FL 34104 era e • . v.rA , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I wish to express my opposition to the above amendment. An increase in leasable space by one third is too much for the size of the property as it would be similar to the 200,000 sf limit in the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district, but in half of the area. I am concerned about traffic congestion, noise and that my property value may decrease. I also think there should be more of a buffer between the development and Black Bear Ridge to mitigate noise, light, etc. I am also against any drive through type of establishment which I understand is specifically prohibited, Sincerely, /4Venzin--' COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation. Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net . 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmicfacolliergov,llet . 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041.25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs: I am a resident of Black Bear Ridge. and I oppose the above proposed amendments because of the effect upon me and my property because of the inadequate buffer for the noise and lights. I oppose it because of the concerns of the increased traffic and congestion and the safety hazards such increased traffic will bring. I oppose it because the request for an increase to 200,000 sq. ft, is an unreasonable increase over the original guidelines approved for in the original Carolina Village. I am not against development but am asking for a measured development that is in keeping with the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. Mary Allen 7347 Acorn Way LA-------- , ,. .,,. . i 7 I, _, 1 — I — / / 7 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHLAICR SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation. Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr.. Naples. FL 34104 ErcdReischl'acollicroov.net 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT.MCP. PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section. Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr.. Naples, FL 34104 corbvschmidta,colliergov.nct , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588. 25525600041,25525600067.25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs. I am writing to express my opposition to the above proposed amendment that would add 50,000 square feet to the allowable leasable space. This would result in a 200,000 sl maximum leasable space that would he equal to that allowed in the Mission Hills CPUD that is twice as large. The cit nsnt- would be too much for the area and would benefit the developer to the detriment of the neighborhood. I am concerned about increased noise, light pollutionfrom headlights. traffic and congestion. I would like to see some new services available, but in a pedestrian friendly environment that I could walk to and that would enhance the neighborhood. More hollering would seem to be desirable as well as what is proposed appears to he more visual thanfimetional. Also, we do not need another drive through of any kind as one is already available at Mission Mils, RespecIfidiy, (.62/e4/ z,L)/.9 4/4 /2 ":6) 3 Xi/ COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 r-.R- hl( • gov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov,net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, As a resident of Black Bear Ridge, which abuts the development for which the above GMPA application has been made, I oppose any increase in allowable leasable square footage. I am concerned about how any increase may negatively impact quality of life and property values in the neighboring developments due to increased traffic and congestion as well as increased noise and pollution. Development of the property in the manner which was initially proposed and approved by the county; an MPUD with a pedestrian friendly atmosphere with services provided that would enhance the community would be desirable. An additional drive through or any variation would not be desired as it would be a duplication of services and unnecessarily add to the traffic and congestion. If the amendment were approved, the density allowed would be equal to the maximum allowable leasable space for the Mission Hills PUD, but in half of the acreage. This is not in keeping with the aesthetics of the area. Sincerely, )difki, v\1616'7441V 3 a-c_elyvN LAA,) )) COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation. Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 FredReisc;h1@colliergovnet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@'colliergovnel , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546.25525600562,25525600588. 25525600041.25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, This amendment would seemingly provide special benefit to the developer with little benefit to the adjacent property owners and I am opposed to it. I live in Black Bear Ridge, which adjoins Vanderbilt Commons and am concerned about negative impacts on quality of life due to increased congestion, traffic, noise and pollution. I would favor development of the property according to the original plan of a pedestrian friendly atmosphere that people could walk to and obtain services not already available. Increasing the leasable space to 200.000 sf results in a density roughly twice that of the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district. I am opposed to that. I would also be opposed to an additional drive through facility of any type as one is already available in Mission Hills, I also think the proposed buffering between BBR and the development is not adequate and should be increased. Sincerely, vz ,..7 7? 5 5---/ I iegji r‘i'll e ,fez -...--- FLAc-SIC COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FreciBecolliergov,net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr„ Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt(P)colliergovnet , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I reside in the Black Bear Ridge community and am writing in opposition to the above GMP amendment. A request for an increase in gross leasable square footage from 150,000 to 200,000 will result in a density twice that of the adjacent full commercial Mission Hills district which has more than twice the acreage. The Carolina Commons MPUD as originally approved was supposed to act as a buffer between the full commercial Mission Hills and the adjacent Wolf Creek residential area. Increasing the leasable space by one third is not in keeping with the original intent and is to the benefit of the developer alone, saddling the adjacent homeowners with the negative effect. I am concerned about the negative impacts of increased congestion, noise, traffic and pollution, including vehicular light shining into the backs of the residences in the adjoining BBR community. I also understand that there has been a proposal by the developer to include a drive through/drive up establishment which is prohibited by the current MPUD ordinance. I would be opposed to a drive through or any variation due to its' negative impacts. Also, there is already a fast food drive up in the adjacent Mission Hills district. I am not against development and would favor what was originally proposed, which is a pedestrian friendly MPUD that would add desired services that would be walkable and would enhance the quality of life. Sincrrely, ,7 / ''',.. "---. -...„,......., \ Al) --/Z.,-, -/e2 /) ,„- .7 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Fredfielsch_1@:icolliergovnet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmIdt(Li)cOlergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I am not in favor of the above proposed amendment and oppose any increase in allowable leasable space. I live in Black Bear Ridge, which abuts the Carolina Commons/Mission Hills expansion district and suspect an approval of that increase in leasable space would negatively impact the quality of life in the neighborhood as a result of increased congestion, traffic, noise and vehicular light. Also, there may be a negative impact on property values as a result. An increase to 200.000 sf leasable space would result in a density twice that of Mission Hills commercial district. That would not be in keeping with the approved plan for a pedestrian friendly MPUD that would provide additional desired services and employment opportunities that could be walked to. The increase would be a specific benefit to the developer, but not to adjacent landowners. I think that there also may not be enough of a buffer along the northern portion of the VC development to adequately mitigate noise and vehicular light from the adjoining BBR residences and would hope that you would consider increasing the requirements for the buffer zone. Thank you. /. / - (.- _..., 7 /t - 2) , , COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FreciRetschl@colliergo.v.riet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 • • ins • v,i-tel , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, With respect to the above proposed increase in leasable space, I am opposed. I live in Black Bear Ridge and suspect that it would degrade the quality of life in the neighborhood by increasing congestion, traffic, noise and light pollution. A density of twice what is allowed in the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district is not in keeping with the design/plan for Carolina Commons to have acted as a buffer between the Mission Hills commercial district and the Wolf Creek RPUD. Is also would not be conducive to a pedestrian friendly atmosphere. I would be in favor of development according to the original plan which would enhance the neighborhood. I think that the buffer along the northern aspect of the proposed Vanderbilt Commons is probably not adequate to mitigate noise and vehicular headlights, which would negatively impact the adjoining residences in BBR. I am also concerned how the suspected degradation of quality of life from an increased commercial density may affect property values. I would also be opposed to a drive though establishment of any type. This is already available at Mission Hills Thank you, Jciit 1-4 tAXti-k.1 Mr Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Fl 34104 Dear Mr. Schmidt: We present to you a Petition and Letters from the residents of Black Bear Ridge Naples, Fl concerning the GMP Amendment Application from Vanderbilt Commons. An copy of the Petition and 1 letter is being emailed directly to Mr. Fred Reischi advising that originals have been delivered to your office on December 19, 2016 If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact one of the contacts listed below. Respectfully, Beverly Smith - Beverly Smith bevsmith116@gmail.com Terrie Abrams terrie.abrams@gmaii corn Marc Allen mallenny@gmail.com TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI,AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning& Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr.. Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section,Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 carbyschmidt(@.colliergov.net . 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I oppose the above proposed amendment. I am a resident of Black Bear Ridge and am concerned about the increased congestion, traffic and negative effects upon the neighborhood that an increase in leasable square footage of one third would potentially produce. 200,000 sf of leasable space would be comparable to that allowed in the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district in half the acreage. The density is too much and not fitting for the area. I am in favor of the originally proposed pedestrian friendly MPUD that would provide additional services not currently available. I am against a drive through or any variant, we already have one close by at Mission Hills. ly, Respectful • vc_t,kos-Cub TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI,AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning& Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischlecolliewoynet 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 carbysehmicit@colheraovnet 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I live in Black Bear Ridge and am writing in opposition to the proposed amendment above. I am concerned about the increased congestion, traffic, noise and pollution that may result as well as a possible detrimental effect upon property values. I am opposed to any drive through establishment, we already have on in Mission Hills. I think there should be more buffering to mitigate noise, lights etc. Increasing the leasable space by a third within the — 15 acre parcel results in a density twice as much as the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district. This is not in keeping with an upscale neighborhood and may negatively affect property values. I would like to see the area developed as a pedestrian friendly MPUD as was originally stipulated. More services not already provided would be desirable. Sincerely, 7c;o9 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION ‘kimor MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Esecifteischl • •• - , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP. PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I live in Black Bear Ridge and am against the above proposed increase in leasable space for the Vanderbilt Commons/Mission Hills expansion district. I am concerned it may have a negative impact upon property values due to negatively affecting quality of life in the neighborhood as a result of increased traffic and congestion, noise and car and truck headlights shining through the preserve into adjoining BBR residences. An increase in leasable space density to twice that of the full commercial Mission Hills PUD does not fit with the approved concept of Carolina Commons acting as a buffer between a full commercial district and the adjacent Wolf Creek residential PUD. It would be of benefit to the developer but not to the neighborhood. Development of Vanderbilt Commons as a pedestrian friendly MPUD as originally approved would be desirable, providing services not already available which would enhance the neighborhood. We do not need an additional drive through fast food restaurant or any variation of such as it would merely exacerbate negative effects and there is already that service in the Mission Hills district. I would ask you to please review and consider increasing the northern buffer planned for VC as it would appear to be inadequate for mitigating any negative effects of the development Thank you, .10 • '70)\'.-7 (2/UI71( 0a-ci COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov,nei , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colltergov,net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I do not support the above proposal and oppose any increase in leasable square footage for the Carolina Commons MPUD/Mission Hills expansion area. I live in Black Bear Ridge and am concerned that my property value may be negatively impacted due to an over density of commercial establishments that will produce increased congestion, traffic, noise and light pollution and overall degrade the quality of life. The above district was originally intended as a buffer between the commercial Mission Hills district and the Wolf Creek RPUD, thus was approved as an MPUD to provide for a pedestrian friendly development that would provide walk to services that would enhance the area. That type of development would be desirable. Increasing the leasable space by one third would not. I would also oppose any drive through or drive up type establishment which as it would exacerbate the negative effects, and there is already that service at Mission Hills. More buffering to mitigate noise and light at night would also be desirable as the proposed buffer on the north side of the development appears inadequate. Respectfully, L'k_cr)d06----er-J COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Fr_eL:_iReisohlVcolliergovnet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I live in Black Bear Ridge, which abuts the development for which the above GMPA application has been made, and I oppose the above application for an increase in allowable gross leasable space. If the amendment were approved, it would increase the allowable leasable space resulting in a density twice that of the adjacent full commercial Mission Hills PUD. I am concerned about problems related to increased traffic and congestion as well as noise and pollution and their resultant impact upon quality of life and property values. It would be nice and desirable for the property to be developed in the manner which was originally proposed and approved, which is an MPUD with a pedestrian friendly atmosphere provident additional services that would enhance the area and quality of life. More buffering to mitigate the effects of the development would also be desirable, particularly between the proposed development and BBR. An additional drive through establishment in any format would not be desirable and would duplicate a service that is already available at Mission Hills. Respectfully. C z A L • • • r COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation. Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 ELeJfiedscbtacoltiergov,n_et 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP. PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr_ Naples, FL 34104 corbvschmidt@colltergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I reside in Black Bear Ridge and oppose any increase in leasable space for the Vanderbilt Commons/Mission Hills expansion district. An increase to 200,000 sf gross leasable space would result in a square foot per acre density twice that of the adjacent Mission Hills commercial PUD. This is not in keeping with a pedestrian friendly environment with walk to services that was approved for the Carolina Commons MPUD. It will likely lead to increased traffic and congestion, noise and light pollution that will degrade the quality of life in the neighborhood and will be of specific benefit to the developer only. Any sort of drive up/through establishment would also be undesirable and is currently prohibited. This service is already available in the Mission Hills commercial PUD. Also, it would appear that the proposed buffer along the northern aspect of the VC development may do little to mitigate noise and the impact of truck and automobile headlights on the adjacent BBR residences, and consideration of increasing the density and type of buffer is requested. Thank you for your consideration, review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a nega- tive impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: Name: 15?ny t_, FR4LEY Please Print Address 7 3 3- 6 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 c COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 EredReischlcoll-Leigo_mel . 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Garty5chmidl@coJlieJgQxnet , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr, Schmidt, I am a resident of Black Bear Ridge, which abuts the northern border of the Vanderbilt Commons/Carolina Commons MPUD. It would seem that an increase in gross leasable space for the MPUD to 200,000 would be of specific benefit to the developer, but likely be detrimental to adjoining landowners due to the increased noise, congestion, traffic and other negative impacts which would result. I am opposed to any increase in leasable space. If increased to 200,000 sf, the amount allowed would be equal to the maximum allowed in the Mission Hills commercial PUD but on less than half the acreage, thus resulting in twice the density. This is not in keeping with a pedestrian friendly environment that would augment the neighborhood. The original plan should be followed and that development would be welcome; addition desired services in a walkable environment. Any sort of drive up facility would be opposed, as it is currently prohibited, and would be a redundant service, already provided by Mission Hills, and would negatively impact the neighborhood. Looking at the design plans it seems that the buffering being provided along the northern border of VC would do little to mitigate negative impacts such as noise and light from vehicles. I hope you will consider requiring some increased buffering in that location that may help mitigate those effects. Respectfully, AI% review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a nega- tive impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: 9f.' Name: Please Print Address 7I,e) Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 10: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH AMAAGEMENT DIVISION* ,111?. FRED REIS(111, A1(Y SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth lanagement Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, EL 34104 PredReischta;collicrpormet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SC1IMIDT PRIN(1P41. PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section. Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Or. Naples, FL $4104 corhyschmidracollietgor net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application 'anderbili Beach RoadVollier Blvd(ammercial Subdistrict' Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546.25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067.25525600083. 25525600096 Dear Sirs, 1 am a Black Bear Ridge resident and Oppose the proposed amendment above. 1 think there should he more buffering to mitigate noise, lights etc. Increasing the leasable space by a third results in a density twice as much as the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district, which has twice the acreage. This is not in keeping with an upscale neighborhood and may negatively affect property values. 1 would like to see the area developed as a pedestrianfriendly MPUL)as was originally stipulated. More,services not ab-etuli provided would he desirable. I am concerned about the detrimental effects of noise. congestion and trattic. Sincerely. \Ai 72 /c tccr tit/ COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReLschLacoiltergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I oppose the above referred to application requesting an increase in the allowable gross leasable space to 200,000 sf. I live in Black Bear Ridge and am concerned that if approved there will be a degradation of quality of life due to increased traffic and congestion as well as increased noise and light pollution. I am also concerned that there may be a negative impact on property values. Carolina Commons was approved as an MPUD to provide a buffer between the full commercial Mission Hills PUD and the adjacent residential Wolf Creek RPUD. Increasing the leasable space to 200,000 sf will result in a density twice that of the adjacent Mission Hills commercial PUD.That density is not in keeping with the intended plan and is of specific benefit to the developer and not to the adjoining landowners. I would also oppose a drive through in any form,we already have that service at Mission Hills. More buffering between Vanderbilt Commons and 138R would also be desirable to mitigate noise and light pollution. Vanderbilt Commons should be developed as originally approved to provide a pedestrian friendly environment that would enhance the neighborhood. Respectfully, 4p4 c_ 7 dig mei-41. - 1425 Ac)0\4 v-AL) AIW. COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI,AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division corbyschmidtcollieroov.net , 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 2552560004125525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr Schmidt, I am a resident in Black Bear Ridge, which is next to the Vanderbilt Commons development which is seeking the increase in gross leasable space with the application above. I oppose any change as it does not seem to be of benefit to the neighborhood and only serves to be of benefit to the developer. I have also heard that the developer has proposed a drive through establishment. I am opposed to any additional drive throughs of any form . We already have a drive through to service us at Mission Hills. We do not need another Increasing the commercial density, as requested in the application would result in a density twice that of the full commercial Mission Hills. Carolina Commons was supposed to be "pedestrian friendly"and provide walk to services that would enhance the neighborhood. Development along those lines would be welcome. As a homeowner in the neighborhood I am concerned about worsening of quality of life if the area is not developed properly, and that negative effects such as increased traffic congestion and noise may be worsened. There is also the possibility that property values may be negatively effected,. not that they may decrease, but any increases may not keep up with other similar areas. One other concern relates to the buffer along the northern border which seems more visual than functional and does not seem of sufficient density to mitigate noise or light from car and truck headlights impacting BBR residences. Please consider requiring an increase in that buffer. Thirik you. \\I )1\, I sji COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI,AICP, SENIOR PLANNER N....- Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I oppose this amendment proposal. I am a homeowner in Black Bear Ridge and do not think that increasing the developer's allowable gross leasable space serves any function in improving the neighborhood and enhancing a pedestrian friendly atmosphere, which was the original intent of the Carolina Commons MPUD. I have also heard that the developer has proposed a drive through establishment for the development. I am opposed to that in any form. We already have one at Mission Hills and adding another would merely make any negative effects worse. I am concerned that there will be a decrease in my quality of life due to increased traffic congestion and noise, as well as possibly a negative impact on my property value. I would approve of development according to the original plan with Vanderbilt Commons acting as a buffer between a full commercial district Mission Hills and the adjoining residential developments. Also, it looks like the proposed buffer along the northern border of Vanderbilt Commons may be inadequate to mitigate any negative effects upon the BBR development, such as noise and headlights shining into the backs of homes at night. Please consider increasing those buffer requirements Thank you, r6,--1_, ----- (' ile cc-Li/L._ .------- -.a jbye 5, t--2._ C COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI,AICP. SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation. Growth Management Division FredReischlcolliergov net 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division corbyschmidt(a.colliergov net , 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers' 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041.25525600067,25525600083. 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I would urge you to not approve the above plan amendment application as it does not seem to be in keeping with the original intent for Carolina Commons to be developed as a buffer between the full commercial Mission Hills district and the adjacent Wolf Creek PUD, which is residential. An increase in leasable space for Vanderbilt Commons to 200,000 sf would result in a commercial density twice that of Mission Hills. I am concerned about the negative effects of that density such as noise, traffic congestion and an overall decrease in quality of life for the neighborhood. With respect to BBR, where I reside, the impact upon traffic flow and noise would be of special concern. There also is the possibility of property values not keeping up with the rest of the area, due to increased commercial density. Also, the buffer proposed along the northern border of VC does not seem adequate to block stray light from headlights shining into the backs of houses in BBR, nor from decreasing noise. It seems more decorative than functional. Please review the buffer with respect to those issue. A more dense buffer would be desirable. I also understand that the developer has proposed a drive through. I would be opposed to that in any form. It would be a redundant service as we already have one at Mission Hills and an additional one would merely worsen any negative impacts. The original plan to develop the area as pedestrian friendly and with walk to services that would enhance the area would be desirable. Thank you. )(.(5 Acert 5ctt 17 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 B' 1 Lvcolliergnel . 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT. AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 oorbyschrnidtk.23oollierg_gv,net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520.25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I am a resident of Black Bear Ridge. I am against the above amendment. An increase in leasable space of one third results in a density twice as much as the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district which has a 200,000 sf restriction with — 34 acres, which is twice as much space as the CarolinaNanderbilt Commons property. I am concerned about the negative impacts due to increased traffic and congestion as well as possible negative impacts on home values. Also, no to any drive throughs which would further exacerbate congestion, noise, etc. Sincerely. ,:) 9• COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReiscbEs cQlliergo .ne.t , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr.. Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt(a)colliergov et , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Sirs, I live in Black Bear Ridge and am writing to express my opposition to the above amendment. The developer is asking for and increase in leasable space of one third, CO which would be equal to the adjacent Mission Hills commercial district, but in half of the acreage. I am concerned about the resultant increased traffic, congestion and noise. I have heard that the developer may be desiring to have a fast food restaurant with a drive through. I am opposed to that. There is already a similar service across the street. I would ask you to hold the developer to the original parameters in place when the development was approved and when he purchased the property Sincerely, COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI,AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation. Growth Management Division FredReischl • collter•ov.net , 239-252-4211 MR CORBY SCHMIDT,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division corbyschmidt@collieroov net 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr. Naples. FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr.Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I oppose this amendment application. Hive in Black Bear Ridge and am concerned about the negative effects of an increase in gross leasable space to a point where it is equal to the maximum allowed in Mission Hills, which is full commercial and has twice the acreage. The Carolina Commons development was supposed to act as a buffer between commercial and residential developments. Increasing the commercial density in the planned MPUD buffer to twice that in the Mission Hills commercial zone does not serve the original purpose and will merely make any negative impacts upon the residential area worse. I have also heard that the developer has proposed a drive through facility. That would be a redundant service, as one already exists at Mission Hills, and a drive through of any form would worsen any negative effects. I am concerned about a worsening of quality of life in the area due to increased traffic congestion and noise. The area was supposed to be developed as a pedestrian friendly atmosphere with walk to services. That would be welcome.An increase in commercial density would seem to be of special benefit to the developer only and not to other adjacent landowners. This should not be approved. Another concern is that the proposed buffer along the northern aspect of the Vanderbilt Commons project does not seem to be adequate to provide functional mitigation of either noise or stray light from vehicular headlight negatively impacting residences in BBR.Please consider requiring a denser buffer that may be fnore functional. Thank you for your consideretion, / c / / 72J / / t/ ,00°- COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division Goibyachm id/q:1)co thergov.no , 239-252-2944 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 Dear Mr. Reischl and Mr. Schmidt, I disapprove of and oppose the above plan amendment. I live in Black Bear Ridge, which borders the above subdistrict. I am concerned about the negative impacts of increasing the leasable square footage up to 200,000, which would be equal to the maximum allowed in the Mission Hills commercial district which is adjacent, and which has twice the acreage. The resultant density in the Vanderbilt Commons MPUD would be twice that of the Mission Hills full commercial district. It would accrue to the benefit of the developer as a special benefit, not to the adjoining residential homeowners who would be saddled with increased congestion, traffic, noise and vehicular headlights shining into the backs of the adjoining houses in BBR. An increase is not in keeping with the original plan of a pedestrian friendly MPUD which would provide needed additional services that would enhance the quality of life and be walk to. The amendment should not be approved. I addition, it would appear that the proposed buffer along the northern aspect of the Vanderbilt Commons project would be inadequate to actually mitigate any negative impacts from the development such as noise and headlights from vehicles. Please consider increasing the buffer required. Thank you for your consideration, ( /c;?-26 -1 r---) ) December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR, FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot cEnve thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B. Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business wi •-n- ,n• th- r,ffi ii• -r, - n• •nl i ki • Ist t -nt r.,• 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, av Signature: Name: /C1911 Please Print Address 7:3W Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 ,.... ..,. ..;.!..,.. ....„:„.„..„.„......„.......„:„ ,.. . ..„ . . , .. , :40-ay..:::.... .,„1,,,,....e..,.1..,..1,....,‘„,..,.. ........,,..E,7,....„,:...........:.:7.....,J,......1...................,....,...:..,..... ,.....;,...,....:,...,,,,,,..,..,..,:.....::......:,.... . .„. .. . ‘...:..„...........;. ....,.........::::::„!............. ,......... .. ......,,,.1„...,.. ... ,:,.., ..„.....„.....- . ,.. . ,. . .., . . . . ,... .., I . ......„, , . . ..„.„. , .. .. , . . .. . ..,, ,.. ..„.mai„i . .,:iittK.....,„„:„......,„.„.:.....,:,......„.....„: , .. ,...41.5.40.0 4,,..4.,„.....„,,:,,.,....„.„.,:„.„,„.:„:„.„„..,........ .... . : .. „. . . . .,.. , .. ...„.„.:„„,,„:..,:„:„.,, ...,..,....,.„1„,...mkforseitock„,...:„.„ ...: ..., . ... . --- „4„-„,",vs,4116,"4,!,,,511!::::azi,,,;...41;•:,.iic..74 „r,,,„,:,,..a,:i:.,:.itilim!,,!it ,;..., .. , . .: ...„..,::.„,.::....,:,:•::,......:,,,....2::;......:,...,,,,,,,..„oiliolicialiiii. ...„...„., ,(--, ,k$Nult 8. • . .. ... .,...„..... ,,,..........,,4„, ,„„„,,......„, t -(''''''' • V if ' . - . ,. ,. N.'''. •.* ..,»...:, * , ,,.. or4'1VE THRU -;,,' 'i•;a/,,4',.. ''',"-A. ••.. . • .„ .41 . . . ......::,. Mierw .1111, ..\, i . .....,,,_::..r.,„ Ilik..... . , : . ...., _ .........„. .... .„•___ „-.7....::::...„. .,....„. 1.....,, ilic... .. . i w: . •••::::::: . ., . ' - 1 ' mi........... ,....::::,-..,,,,....,, ,, ,,,, „•,,,....42.,:1 . . .. i I , •••• • ,,,,„„„„„ l . ib: •!:•$0..-...,••;;,,i8d.',44at.' ::',:a:•',.','•4"-k----j!Le'-• ' ...' : .,.., ' IT . ,,,,.0„--,aii-,,,,r4i: ,?•.i:...:-•:i.,,,.'''.::2'...-%" ;II 1 ...._ . ... ..... _. . ,06606............. , , is r _ , •1 —, i i isi , I ' " K li ar:i ini.i.sti.... ..... : . .,., ,. III ' . P I 1 , it — ... • :: ll II ..... ...- a 1 li § II- - - • IS ! --jik - Y. ...... . .......- . A ., f.: ,P.F'. t f5g ''! t: I i!:.v.:;:ii!. r.:`. r-u 1112);":111:: 1;,-.•..' 1::::':;::: .00..0. ....66 ...... ,..,,m . ....... .......,.yeb............ m,... •10* „......... . .. '''' '? '' ....* ........11.010. . ...1110 . _......4 ...,... .....,`. 40. .c....,.•,..:. ...,.. .1. aft , ... e<" ' ...". E., ,,... 14 r., g,,... .... ,... .......1040, — .,...,,. 5.,..2ft:- , - , . .. ..,,,,,= ,,...... ...„„. „..,....r...„.................... ...,....z: ,,,....,...... ... 11 '''' '''"* 7,7.:,... i0111151v?4,1211#4411,1aszifttiw,--T.,,. , -,,,,..--,.----,'-;-; .744•Aigit‘ifiA;Werke.:;r2"-''''''' ..- - ....._ ::., .. it;0 ;''. • A--Was this review ...? B 4 Useful 4 e Funny e Cool ODD 1 /2/2016 glig 7 check-ins First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! s sat in t e drive up lane as there was no where to park to •o inside I watched car after car struggle to get backed out of their s \Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my 3iggest pet peeve is e •rcn s were mase sloppy., No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I ll give it sometime before I stop back. 99. Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review .... c+ ssasat s wEIaay ,,?' rvasa ;.... _. _... Ej4jtsr OCIDOCI 9/3/2016 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the Jobb waitin• to order food at *: $ AT on a Saturda mornin• There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a very papular coffee shop. _� ... y��by a�$y q ptl yy q�yyy a�. $ CAR V 4N I�6T ' • FI:11401 E E BAGELS DRIVE s ; '14* yyf r 44, ° •118 ` - December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, A1CP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergovnet , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent - 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. FadMies for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant. fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Fieview of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hindeiance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. . 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application:, Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD, The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. t . Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: /V Name: Please Print Address 73 if'? Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 • y� h1 fl n. ..,,,,,,,F,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„„:„„:„.:•.•.•.- ' / s '''' . -- -,-,-;r., 1;,..- .::::-\k,,,.:'-' , ..• '•:...7'!..,..4,'-.::-----::::::-- -- -,- .::.:i:',;s!,.-:.--.-si!iiiiitgai;i:'''-E:---::- DRIVE THRLI 0. •rat;i171.7'-'7:---:.--:,--- 1::--iilftlilliN00,4-;,-:::411P!!MgiiiIMOINCi-:-.--,--:--:-:---- . :N„gl&,'::.'.-'..„'Jk„-.„-..,:„"migigilioN .„—,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,. „-„:„..„.• . d '.. +a, ,/ IIIII.P!...,mr 2,M-•.•_ -0*-r ••:,,ATiZT-Iiiiiii! y Ii!ff:i .k «� .,. —7------'------ , «..a.. . .:..i.• lia-Nisiiiir:s . , ---'1----- - c... ,.,:. , j. I la 1 lit ill I ; : . . . .. .,.'i!.i-.0. .6- .,-;.....;i:::,.,.. z;.,-? 4-:---- -'--. 'm,,, -- :..... ,,:-j,- I .. i. w.... -11-:-... ii- j_.,*-.i.'---11.-.7-1- „ t.:::,1,:,.....,.. 1,,..i.,-.-„,-'!,.,::. ap «. ^'. E;. °'. il"':...."'''''': ' ,,. r:a... '^ asp"' ..+� .s ,..w., ,,, ::: ''','-'•7 '-'7.i.-::::.‘„:77,1 57,# '',;*•• ::;:'.- -::;:"‘lif ' .:1;7 - -:' - - - ...,- I!" '.: it'-'-' I 111:FiL:14'.-0:.,till 1„,,t.si 417- ....-1-;. ..., .,..— •';:i7.;..... inic. ..,a ,....,VVas this review . . ? 13 -r (:) Useful .4 e) Funny e Cool ODD 1i2/20-16 ...61k: 7 cherk-ins F st to ReNs., ir I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking at/drive up lane set up is horrible!! is sat in t e * rive up lane as there was no where to park to eo inside I watched s' \ car after car strugg e to get backed gkit21....thcj: E___ot. Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my %gest pet peeve rsIfies were ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... give it sometime before I stop back. Oira Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ,..? ex yvtia.L.A.,t1 it "4.0,14,11,,,,, , 'VP' ' ‘4"III3' .0"... Es-A I-1 i 13 .1- C, -00000 9/3/2016 'I check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. , There were 32 customers in line in the loblitir291.)t ''-'- .,, wa f, order food at •:. AM on a Saturda mornin* There were 15 cars. waitin* in drive u*. his is a ve o ular coffee , ti ... At ,,,,,_..........._____ 1.4, ,,, , -t;',., -, =.:Z.'.'...-7, 7-.2;I'd- ',...,-4.---. 0;tr, ',,,zp,4,,,,,,..n..- ....;.,.,,,„•.-,, 4.„...,.,, ,,,, ,, , ....„,„ ,,,,..r.e,:.-.=;-.1.:t-, ,,,-- .,7-. f.,:„.•;,.7 «...,,,,,4-; ,'. ,,,,„..: V*6 4,,,,,,,,- - '',- ,..,*.. .-37.z.7.-.;;„0 -4 ,,,,..-t,erg('v,.,,-,,i-,:7;.-----.i-=tu,.. e-r,...1.-z.t„,::• - : --;:.,..- --,:re,:%;-zxr.--- _. ,;.--, .,,,,,,:„ -441k.„...;4,,,,,,,,:440-r.z.,,,V ' * 1 -t°,, 4 CARIBOU COFFEE & BAGELS ie.440: 4 ()RIVE T HRU - ." IT Li ,t. .., I ,, ,--- , - • 0 • f * - , , . , December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2, BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities induding Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling, Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; tr. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated, Exhibit B• Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: / Name: Wad(/ hs Please Print Address 5 I Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 1110:,s 1 '�`�� 6 f SFr % ' 'F X45/ k': �pr fhf ^ 2 3/ `A a s � �y i ViZI:1131001 .« a zz a..>-, a ... . ' ; ' maAft \ 44 e i tla +T11, r_'-E"A-1" .:.,...._-,4---A . ... I ^¢u mss.,,. il I f* ' .. '.', 11-!. .!!!!' ;:: °.. , ,!tg.i.e.':- .I., *ill ad r.,.,..: . _ ,.. . mi--" it 1 i i i i.. ,:.1 :. a F !.: ....- — kf. -- .'' - -am IN aim lig _ _ .-,- l'..: 1.- ..,,, .7.; ..-.;,', -71 7...1...:-.... w ai 1 i. . i . X le ,:.- .;,,,, a , z .;,..:77 .z.....!.. ,--- - k.- - -= ,,---. .....— - ,.-•.,_, :-.1.--- ,--- •-•., --,--.:,--.1 •- ---- . - --. ::,----,,,, > m Was this review ...? 141 13 -r Useful 4 e Funny (3 Cool DOD 1/2/2016 IQ 7 oneck-ins (" First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ,;lot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e *rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car s rugg e to set backed out of their soot. VSecond for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my 3iggest-pet peeve is eenn s were mase sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... give it sometime before I stop back. .„0 Drive thru located in REI • Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? EN1, i-4 i - __. MODOCI 9/3/2016 '..\ et 1 check-Ei I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the Jobb waitin• to \ 1 order food M on a Saturda moral. • There were 15 cars waitine in drive u•. h „ is is a veopuar coffee 1,,ik shop. 'Ili A I a cAltisou IfilkiSTeIN Sittere:4% :.; , it COFFEE BAGELS . 1k' ''''' -,q,.....,,,,,:;„5„. ......... IIRIVE ' '''''' W''''' ' - ' t III I . December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties, These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities induding Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hindrance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: [IU Name: ik c I I Please Print Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 F., r r r it c , .;:', ' Nib c,,..,. , 74t r 0" I!I ir - " ' IN ,f if fir" : . # , ,\,. ko ,,,.,tf iltr?..,.*M".'' ,,,.',4:,,,-,0:3,',,,,, : * 1 , 15"511"1""111111"6"1111 if I i I ' li . '" – - -- IFP; N II 1 ii!::', ,,,ili.: ' ' ' ' ' ail-- il 1,„!—*d* '* _..„' ,-, P 1 14M--,.... . '1, i M 1,1.1i— „ ,I , , 11,0 ::: .'; ,.,„ . ...... i ... .. . 1Ili will,- , '.1‘ : , 4 -i 1 i 1 MI 1 1 4,to ,J-1. –,4 -- — '''''' ',..„„ „.. 6 g i t i f i t H ;;.,,, 4 i- „, _a al a 7 ,_,:::.. ._. ..,_.:.,. ...,,.J,,r.7.7 .,.,,,...„:7_2,, :.r,, .7.......„ ...,....., .,..7,,,, „::: ,,,,,,, ,,, ,. { maw. — ,, r-,.,, .. _. _.. ,--Was this review ...? (C) Useful 4 e Funny ( "1 Cool ODD 1/2/2016 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking de4otidrive up lane set up is horrible!! a s sat in t e * rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched cxaftercastrugg e t backed out of thieir ot. VSecond for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my ,)igges pe peeve is e orin s were mase sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... III give it sometime before I stop back. "Ir .asn, • ilf4" • Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? 1"------\/. 4 1 # ,...,... LI 1 000DO 9/3/2016r-� el check-ire I' love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan reel Vilest Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobo waitin* t order food at • on aturda mornin• There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a ve •o•alar coffee shod .. . . ,. ',,""‘.4'' :,,,,,,,,,,.......6.''' ' -44 niL, f 'S' , 0%41":,,,, '''':,,f*t62..44,4,6,94**' � , :::::,..''' '.\21,.;,'-'1,,:,--,,,A):::7,,,,Arlo,„,'"#/:":$,Pyri:1•4';'::,;4,4-.:::24:1',1::,'1: '''''.11,, j, , Ei. ,• ,�` ����ori. 0. ,,,,,,,, ,. is.k. cOF 4 cARIROto rti. . ,., F EE gay gg meg- g ,,z,a i-iR -SH i e ,ter. 1 . .,f December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov,net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess 01 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast toot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, 71,e' Signature: Name: Please Print qi 4C-6,ti-r\ Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 is:1-AAP' - ` t3'T moi' ' y y 3 a r F r=E4x .„ 11pir �.'M r k';!;-4..L*,,,,'A'' 14, N imeirni , rrr =.es a ^a. w void.� fix - �^ � emisserso �-20 `' s. °.. >. n.. w .. > '%amu,.. ., � Jx ..,,..� ,q- intezekse ri f , in . , ti ii: r - 1 1 , . I - 'P' '7: ''''' , r I ' 111 10 ,,111), - ' j • _ _, , , Ili litA, - ,,,,, ti! : 1,1i!r ''''' -- - Ali' i 1 i l 'I — - -..r '-'1' ,- 1"' '.. '''', ' ' I kr :10 4, i i 0.4 IS:;7!4 4' ' ' 74 a.w.." ate! M _ ✓-.> °I - eM ` i, ," ; 4,,,,,, ,•,:',--,..;.•,,----. .., h, - ..:' .»�5_:./ "qw�:. � ✓fie* hr : Was this review ...? ...,_ . Useful 4 e Funny © Cool ODD 1/2/2016 i cieck-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking , at/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e ' rive up ' lane as there Was no where to park to go inside I watched car ac fter ar struggle to • et backed out of their soot eLcond for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird m s. , 3ln—est pet peeve is the drinks were ma e sloppy... NoY one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. 11, # i --' - ,., . - N-A-' . , ' Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review .,..? „,„........ - I 1.11117 I- ii c..... _ ......-, -,- _ 00000 9/3/2016 * 1 check-in Ilove the toasted —g blueberry bagel a g e l with i th butter utter and honey. This is the hot, newJordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were32 customers in line in the Iobb wa-tin. to A orderfoOCia- :05Mon asaturda morningTherewer were 15 carswa.T.ngin drive up. hS ,s a verYpppua rcoffee shop. , _ • --- , ,,. ' '',',#'!,,-:„'-'...,” ,Pa- _ ,,`„,;...-,a0,0 ,,,,sq5,,,, ,,--,,o, ,—*.-1....._,Irr.we...410, -„„-, .:,-ao- ,,,,,,,, ,a.,, , e,7.-'-.4-v''•fitruNr''''::„...1 oar,:;.•%AM ' 4 ,„, ,tip,:.-,„*. ,...e., . ; -,'''.?1,:' "'..,Fr,,00°kt,t$4.14x* .'"''r°1''-,•'1n,''- -n s''*•'r--"*. 4 :t,I,•.e:,,',,"::.'•.'.0-,'0,4.v'*'',.'„,,^,e^4;.^ . ,kr - C0FFEE ' AG N•-„EL,S S,,- i.•''''''''*,..',,-w,-'•,',.-'„' •,4 .,.„'•,l„':,-/','•tg; /• ,; .:.!„ ....„. it E.- Ti-iRki ....-7 ,, .... ,„., ..., ,,.... „ , , .. arir"- i i "rt,.,_, • ,,,/,,,,•,,,:- 0 , i 0 Aw t 4'''' • S m f December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR, FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek APUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties, These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres, Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2, BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jumpftrampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant. fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a 'drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related o the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows_the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. ""'N 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. /Th Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: Name: ..�0`. -s©5 Please Print Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 S p vim? '-4,w,,:',-.-:;.,.(:i.:#:''''' kf a5 s - tap d r.�. DRIVE -- 4- 1. ;, xs M 1-7,_. b ttx air ,„•, „. - 111 s • !Ili I 1 t . 'i . 41g1 eirmoname €` tet _ .. ,I -..*"":7;:'::m 14'I 17' j r II f !,,. .. , , ., , , , , . . , , d - s�, � r --:• �,;,.. ,... ".," ,--***-Was this review 141 B a Useful eFunny Cool ODD 1/2/2016 IQ 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking Aotidrive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e . rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my 3iNe-§T pet peeve- sthe drinks were ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in REI - Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? .J A .Stfir ,. �f urea r �,.rssys 141 , 000130 9/3/2016 check- , I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the Lobb waitin to order food at *:$ • r on a Saturda morning,. There were 15 cars waitin• in drive u•. his is a ver y popular coffee shop. �._�. r 44/ . a : cAstinou riNSTEIN COFFEEIlk 11* BAGELS December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov,net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbvschmidt@collieroov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge, a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD, this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating opposi- tions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Ap- plication. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic and proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental effect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD from original design was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether it be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up establishment is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b, Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees, c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area; or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code, Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a 'drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hindrance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: , -•\ Self-storage faculties referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage ware- housing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle head- lights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the nega- tive effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively affect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south-east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a danger- ous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. al- lotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future own- er/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north-east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge, I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to con- sider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a nega- tive impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, „ i ,----7- • .3) ( Signature: , , , i .------, filt hiC S 6 . ( so 4 Name: s Please Print Address 7 '. q Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 ...._ December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@collierqo+Lnet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@collieraov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge, a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD, this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating opposi- tions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Ap- plication. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic and proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental effect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD from original design was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether it be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up establishment is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the , customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area; or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hindrance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage ware- housing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle head- lights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the nega- tive effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively affect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south-east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a danger- ous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq_ ft. al- lotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future own- er/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north-east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighborinq communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge, I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to con- sider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a nega- tive impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: ff. ,5 Name: A Vie 50A- v4 Please Print ,e) _2 69 cy Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergovnet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties, These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in &parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project, Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft, allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. •-•••\ Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: Name: Please Print 1'7217 Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 • if:i.,.,,,,,,,,„!„„„„„„„„-:.„---„,-„.„,„,„.,„.,"""",„,,„,„„:„.„.„,...„,,,..,,,,„,„„,,,„,„......„:„.„:„„""""",",,,,,,„„,,,:z.„,.,,„„.„‘„„,„.„„,,„.„.,„, _. -__-_ ... ;". "rte 'mo ` <„- s°''`.a v �.• 9 ...\$,•01. , „::::...„...„:, .,:„...„.... .:,,...,:.•,:„.::„.-:, . . . ,,,,,,, .....6..t.,..4..r::::7,.., ....,,,,,,,,,„14,Nas2,-,-„„-,-,,,,,40?:',.,..-'iff.';,":::i.O.,iiii,.,'„,,„:;_:‘,iiii,.4.4.;,J,,,H i-,--„,„:„,..„„,,„„ookm,,,,T,,,---„:„:„.„-,:_.„,,,,: 4 et,rSAN fig. rt eamiggialellihhh -"'°.111111111111111111.1111111.1r. - --, .i...„,...7. .-:'.:-.- 9 � f'".-71 “.,:lf:: ititiziiiiiit .,,,!,-.,,,,,...-- 0 i ted mil ,„---, „„„r„,,„„,,,-„,,,,,,,„.. ,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,„,,,,, : i 777- - ....,;, : ........„, .„., . ;„;,,,,, . . , ,. -- , Ito 1 - , r ,:,,,,,,,, _.: 8E 1, :,.. Lti lig az 5--, t.„,,... , raw .. I : ......„ :,,: ,,,,,c,:,: ,,,,,,.. ,..,,-., .1,,,,,,,. „:::i. i.. Zji -A m ' '''': ,a„,- gq I t- wc.., ., «•^» .mss , d-. ,:„„„:„._0 ,w ww w,mow. "".,.»° "^^. -* a� ":'" w ".:,,,,,,,,,..2.:::::!..,,,,,,,,,::,,,,!..„,....8; _&� «" y1" !,, mit , this review ..,'? 141 t3 B Useful 4 e Funnycoot ODD 1/2/2016 7 check-iris0- First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking /ot/drive up lane set up is horrible► A s sat in t e .rive up lane as-thermmvias no where to park to so inside I watched car after ac r s r � l e to et bac Cad c ut cif theirs Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hied my Jiggest` pet peeve Is e rin s were ma e sloppy._ No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. tr- 3 e.r Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ,... - 1------"i• i-t I 13 T- C._ r-, 00000 9/3/2016 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobb waitin• toAtit„44) .. order food at 57101 on a Saturday rs)(3milig, There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is ave •o•ular coffee i, shop. e.- -r_ ��� y ee.�-•. .. ' �. ,ap, ea �.�_ ,,�,�w �x�'i tea . '' B''�. ^gig ,' � ���` � 1 '��, r, °;,•.-:.° w 1. h; k� I � ;a I ,o,...." COFFEE BAGELS '‘,,,,,,i,t!..vd, E)RIVF THkki. i ;,, Cf;4:i'014:1 ziWA tt: ,,:z.,,,ii,., ,1 , 11 ii i t ✓F,z December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov,net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone', and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Fad lilies for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or a A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A Shows the business which is being considered or this property on the south east corner. This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B; Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking 19t/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential to traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature; At.A.A /if, Narne.._ Air A Please Pri t Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 • fs- wx .- 3 •=is ,,,, 41;0'1.• �' ;,-�� rte; � Ry "'Le M •fl Ifilit t: t. 16„. a ilk Ak,;„,.-,„,„,,, i -'-'-''''''''''''''''- ?`3 • Ps tib, i {' ,p f - t.' -1111. 1 -- -t., 0 i w , .. , it 4. :,,,.,,,, i'--..-I- f',0.41 ill gilli:._ . .., . 1 II g ^Was this review ...? e., 1-1113 -i- B 0 Useful 4 e Funny Cool OD 0 1/2/2016 7 check-ins 0First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking of/drive up lane set up is horrible!! `A s sat in t e • rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched \___, car after racr s rTug e to •et backed out of their soot. Second for a drive up it was extremely slow] hird my Digs es pe peeve is the drinks were ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. a w, _sem Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? l'"° .., +4,..4,1,0,60 I T E1 Ni* I4 i 13 - ( .. ,....., 00000 9/3/2016 el check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter andhoney. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. 't There here were 32 customers in line in the Jobb waitins to , leorder food at *:$ A V on a Saturda mornini There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a very_gpo ular coffee shop. ,,,,igtog, m.-=> k<4<<%• ,.?J4k;- -sa'-''''•; -...,', , 25';'''''. :<,,<•..--'014.;<'-','<, ,<'..,\ . - -,<,<„k, ,,,,i, ,<,<:. ,,,,,,,,'' '''rr l''It-7 ai-'l;:,;;; .1*,''..'•.;:;104:77'{.<': ' "7,17-,.,:t,t,.: -,:11.;"4,:?k, .....:-,?../Ltfr,A;-,,,,,,,,,,,tilor:::,,,irrola.4,,,,it:,, --z:z,s,,toi OMS),,1741,1'-:7,1v,,,,,..,.7::•-;41-,..,-''''ii.',.,.. .:.r. .g: ,' --- -`, -, 1-...)2v-:,,,:-...,i,,,.35,1,-;.--.2 -' -%.,‘.4;,:',,:t"' :7:.-,..,;'''Att, • 1. ,""'"V--- '•:' CAR/BOU CINSTEIN Ti-y41r1"r 4: ' r-_,_ COFFEE BAGELS If . ... . ,..... L)„,v, `11-iRtJ ,... .. Twfar PIM 1 1 .. • • ',, - ilk tio , , December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCH1, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment, The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds, On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps lire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations, Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus, Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which 's being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane whioh is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but aijacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and seff-storacie iyarehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD, The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, ) Signature: e Name: a A de. OrTY-Lk.3 Please Print Ic.:2(.0 Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 • r A s, # § �fn2w "f I� :,--,'"'-'..47,74:1141',, y '!VE THRU t. L„,-..... 144' i ii*: 4 IOW r ... .' ,... . ,,v,teroe.e..z, . ..„,.... ,. b_da..vill `x to V „,, .. . , :::, , 1 ,." ,... bI .. .... .. iii,. eat ilif !! $J ! t ' IIP , i' ' I° '-* it' 4 ''. 1 r lii. iiiiidt1;:i; ' .. ; _ .,........ z.- 21 1 iltitii -1 - — ." ',., '' ,• if Li.. L. •,,:.'::!: :7 3- ,::: 1 ---'':'.:::—=.,,-1: :,..-„ -,,,, ..— ....- ra,..... — S: 11111 �- �I , § ;� * , � ..6-- 'u � SNE . a IN rf NIt 1 this review ... 1-11 r3 B Useful 4 e Funny Cool DO /2/201 i check- i ir� i t I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking /ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! As 1 sat in the drive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched \,..,car after car sYogg e to • et backed out of their Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my igges pe peeve is e •rrn s were ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess inyour car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in Rei Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? „,,„,..,„. , , . „ , Eit, i4 1 ID r L-- „......, 00000 9/3/201 e ' check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines coffee an waiting to inthe lobby location for line re There were 32,.cu customers in and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. stom on a Saturday morning. lar coffee . _ A y solou — / ' order food at e' ll drive There we -- ..._ „.._ 15 cars waiting in....__u . his is a ve lc: shop. _ ,1--'-''''',' 4,VO: ;:‘,r, ;' '''''''',44;,' ; '''',4 k 4,'''' ,,Wit....a - -.,„7---tmwik,•„: ,„..7.•:.04. -t,-,.-, 4 :,`''..:: °'!1‘ic7:- =‘;'•'''' ''''''' .:4'ii,c, 'ieli'414'.'' 1” '- ' ,, , — giNSTRIN 8"*"'4t it ' . CANISOLP _ COFFEE 1. I- I itRU DR1V- B AG E LSge4 'z ,,.. . I 'S *47 i .,. 0 .,.. 0 ! "4- December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, MCP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as"Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a, A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit 6: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned enclosed mini and self-stor.ge warehousing with no outside starve of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr, will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. ,--,, Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative i mpactonhesurrounding communities and addsnobenefitothe lifestyle and propertyyeloeeepote:otkeepipgwi1CollierCopntyoriginelyteton :orthisprop;rty Respectfully, Signature: 41, \.,,, , < Name'_ Plea Print - Print ---. 7 c-1. .,,cf- AddresS12 10 -CAA . A 1 ay, Naples, FL 34119 ,--\ • )1)1h7r 4y oDig �ex3 � � �nF �,GSyy; DRIVE::".:::"",".:.,.........!,.,:::,....,.,:......::111111:1:',:viimiliiii--iiiiiii--;:-,i;,.::-.:: ::-:-.:".i.:;-,:-.:::::-!-[--7.'-'.-- '•. ... . .. ....,:,,„V.-..-...-"--::i-!!!„.......111V. -..!,,,,..--.,..-,.,-!„,' --------„, - • ' -----:'':•:••••'.•:':•:::••••,'"--.:.•:•"'•:•:•-•-::::•'.-..•'..---441'..'-k: •..4:11111111K .-k;„„ii:-4E-:::--•'::„'---' . •,.,-• ••••:-•::,.....AILIVZ :-.: -----.::"Ni...••..i kf.,:•.:::*".:..'•-:•:-:'•-•-.....:... ,• •••••••„,.•„:„.,._ • .,!Ei„....„:„„..t!,„...•:••• .....:",,,'.: ji pitt, E / SigiikiAnom ,0:1011°11111.1.r ,, .. ,.. ... . ...., .... b H 3;! x. ,w., /�g x, ._ ..... .+ •... era *Y :44. s 11 i i T .1 1111 4-111 III i ""- - ": "-':::':- '::" A I it: I k iii rail Li! of ! - n«i4C g$ yy 11E111 111 _., 14 2--, ' • . ITili. 1!-.:-� w .1,...1......„%..,.,,'„,„„f,--:7I,---I--.-.„1I1,,°,' :....`'...!..."-.......-...i,--. -.t",--..:.. o..1.,..:-........=...,r_..,.7',:t1-,.,.1,,t.!.'....t4...,..:,...-.5.,-:.-.-.t.j.1.:-...:7.;4•,, ate* ..._.!• "`m ..�... .""..�.+ ..7",.. ,,.Fmow. 1 Was fl j3 this review ...? 1-1-1 C) Useful 4 e Funny E3 Cool coo 1/2/2016 IQ 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ?/lot/drive up lane set up is horribte!!fAsTsat in the drive up ,• lane as there was no where to park to so inside I watched car after car strugg e to set backed out of their s•ot. \ Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my Jiggest pet peeve is e inn s were niaoe sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... give it sometime before I stop back. • Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? ; „ , - ..vvi, , LN I%/,Y .%_'.,„, ,,,I Al t- (i E L-' .. .......\ ., 0 0000 9/3/2016 honey. e 1 hec,c-in bagel Moines blueberry West Des the toasted Creek sandwiches. I love Jordanbreakfast with butter and bagels and _itine to This is the hot, new in the Jobb wa customers in were There _ location for coffee and line There popular coffee were 32. 1 A V . is a very P l order food at. • . . , ,e. his - cars waiting drivein '1.__ 15 ------- n' on a Saturda morning, -- . _--- lhop. 1...,e,:rZ,1"IT Ili,ta',,,,;:',:„.7-0,..... ..',7,:ai-zi., ':'.....--;,.4 1-4 V' ' ' ,,,.-• p• - --'''''' s'-',c,*-.4:,Z4 'i:.:7(4,,,,w.L77.,...;,-* /0„.'1f4°;-,,,,,'''''''',°''''..:41f,,,rtA •.,'., le44-7''''' . ,„„4,401,*:,- ., "tl,',7t,,Pfrt.7,l'F'tz?b•-t*,'st-.-,r-q.-itti---7:' "4----''' ,„ . ,. 2:--5. 11''''4 - ,,,,, , ,,,,,i. , ,,„,„ tamp,-.,,, ,„',..V.-- • „ ,,,, - ,., - . „,444•„,,,,144:4:, ,, ,--, miNsTE/N UR07,“ silt*, , 0 ARia" 0 GELS BA ,...,, C 04 g' F F EE E THRkj DRiv . -- IMP, !! 'S i , , f.,, .. ,, 0 it =,.. ' 4111 December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov,net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur ma parking lot/drive up lane which js what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of sto •ge facility as stated in the amen ad application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, , Signature: 01, , Name: , Plea - Print Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 AgaitilittP mr -.1:•:11:17-!!1,1,1,4111411111,47ri1144114117,1)-,!-107mik:,• ,:i.--,-*ii-,------------,---ft .:„.....-.1:''''.:."'::':P;:-.-':::-:':•,'::'::-.--.:- �: vol. H• - S �� a 0 ;' DRIVE 'd'Nu 4 , • �M1py" • I- @x z m .^m tiu W.," •-,..::::::-....-------,„,,,-, - - - - IT f 0"�:by�'�. ^fir . .,.,. . ..... .. YA . '. nal 1 I ik.115.ti ii,j,1,4 F.,..... ,, 11 ' I**.',.. ' • •E ::;,-.1.,H!!!Htyt- - 11::'''''''::,---77-:"Ii:i :;?' .:'1'.tr!....:11-;-'7'iltl'''I--':—....-'-'-t.:'*". set '" " . 3 .: : . -.4 - ! i !-- , :- , !,•;;101 ii: —A ''''' *"*-. '''--::t ':.,:' , °" - !! i'L ! ! te" 1;;;;'- •'7."` ..... 7:••:•':•••:: :::.''-1...-, 'i!'.t,:0 -. .., ••,••• •• _ - `® "-77 Q �. !' ne « .,.� ",..�+"�'� ` ....,_..^" �„ Viµ � ,.:ra""°" ' > «.. .,� • . ^', • :.,, ", • a.. Wig" ...,,., .�>,>. x E• --.Was this review ...? t4"1 r3 0 Useful 4 e Funny e) Cool DOD 1/2/2016 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking /at/drive up lane set up is horrible!! * s sat Mn t e . rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after cIstrUg e to set backed out of Ilicir_s.2.(y.L. \ Second for a drive up it was extremely slowihird my Jigges 7--ZtTDe—'-Theve e drinks were rlie sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? w, , law w t'7 (1...„, , /--.. ,,....,* I Ey... i-i 1 13 r nOCIDD i 9 3/2016 4.41 0 i chec<Hn bagel blueberry k West Des sandwiches. toasted Creek I love the new Jordan — and breakfast sa .s. . to bagels waltin This is the hot. a _ ...., . with buttermanodinehsoney. ming, T customers I Saturda mo , r coffee were t . location for c3o2ffee nu i There -Am on ula — , a'nln.se .isn... _thvee.a.29plobb ../:' order fo°da—T1135. . in drive up. hi I a Therewere 15 cars v‘! It1ncl shop. -------- '"* '..k:7'',:x.,:itfillttti'.1.4.-:,07,,;,,.::1 't,-:-:*a-tldf;',.ir;;:;;Wi ' - °•- .. ' .il -,,„ 0i1,17 -17'''194#;,,:..t:4,1--.. :- -r .';;:,,',,,,,;:.2.: ''_-- ".'• , , , ; ,--, ROT«. TEIN a 8 "?.... : • > , ir C ittAl 9 1,1) 1.- co E E BAGELS DRIVE THR,,, . „t .....,. 0 II e t , , oyok 4,1* 410 I • c „,.., - — * December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities, 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2, BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUE). Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is w at the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line, We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC, Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBA main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: frA-- yr Name: • Please Print 2(;) Address „) Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 • b . , rr , , , . ,,,. ., .. . .,....s,,,. .„,,..iit:;. ..i,. „..,,,,..,....z.4.,,,, .4„, „,...,„07t, , ,,, .., ,,,74::,,..,.,„,y...,„...;_ ,..,...,‘ ..... w:kt,...„..,„, .,„,.. _...... ,t,, ..41:. i:,,--,-- ;-,:-',1:7,',v,W.;:,:iii;*,rel.:-..:`?7,4,T71 €-4,4 _ _ ,- .- .le -„--7--7..,/ - e% ',',1",..1/4".i.' ' . ,,,,A"': '- wit/ ''''' -:"•::. ,, ,' 3 DRIVE y t}' g ire y Ya, b i^^.* ,,,.. , • i 'It;At.4' IIIIIIIIi �'.' i6r.". y� "' ate- - ,-.., re7 I arVuom,a-.• six- � �y'� � -114141111111111111111111111111111111V.,.-.-:::: '": .. d 0 4' .. trassams x' 4 s $.. __ " age 0. -_ F7, V I ill!, i pl rr t1l t . :11. , „,„ : , ,p.,,, ,;. •„.: _.-- , rig 1 1 i / "*" tri -31 "*. * . mo�...., r»:7-..ar « ma" `.« --- ' ---7,7mow s,.R w * „ .-. 714 4 Se 11 . , ,-,Was this review C) Useful 4 4!) Funny (el Cool 000 1/2/2016 IQ 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking .0i/4ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! As sat in t e .rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car s backed out of their ot.to t Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my 1Dig-gest pet peeve ii the drinks were ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... give it sometime before I stop back. —tr fl 4£436*4 Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review 1 "'1117 ----- C i I:"--**I( 14 1 13 i (,, 0 0000 9/3/2016 0, 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobbwaitin0 to • A V , 0rder food at -. • on a Saturda morning There were /(1,_ 15 cars waiting in drive up. hisiy_is a ve popular coffee ..,„„..,....„.„ ., _... lk. shop. 44 , ''.4.11V'4,--i f&ex' ii•-.I''4,,Fi7 ' ' -",- ' i."411- 4\ta:"‘ zi-ve4,-. ,,-'.,-..,-- ..7. - ' -;;;'•IV- ioril,-- :424th 4,-.; .•,.7.-,7, . ,c,:,';:-,.---- -- -• ,‘ ^ .., ,, h COFFEE BAGELS • DRIVE THRU . . , f " II it # i , ........ qk 410 f- - ..., DeCember 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergovnet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres, Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as"Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditio ed enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound, 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: Name: I t v Pie se Print Address Z-C(' / Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 —..., • ,,... _„,, . ,,,,,„„ ,...,, ,_, ,,,, , _ .„..„ , „. „. ,... ,.....„,,,.. . . _,,,,;,e.,,. .„„ ..,,,,.., . . ‘„,_ , ..„. „,,,,,„„.,,,,,,.„,..,,‘,„...„, - - „,....,„ , .., . - y s. - ti s ii.„..,_ ani ,..•‘.01.°11111.111r 0,1 r' 1i .If ' E; '111NI A. .' "'”''' ', ' r,' d (,Y .',. pi L 11,17_,yr:pi,- -,L f I :".6"47. ....is,. : , I ,, lifil I - 1 i!!I 1 2- - 7 I. -- lin t 401-,‘ _ t i',. rk4 t .0., , 4 :, 1 , , 1 i: ,:„. i .":.. 'La"- ; if ` ;, :". a "..+ „'�".... 'r+ . ,o M. Fi 1-1:: a 1 B "-.Was this review ...? I--- 14 Useful 4 e Funny e Cool DE20 1/2/2016 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking /ot/drlve up lane set up is horrible}! As I sat in the * rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched career car s rugg e to get backed out of theirs2 \,-Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my oigges pe peeve is e arm s were mase sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... l'll give it sometime before I stop back. . ir> Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ,..? Ey, il I 13 I C- ,..... DODD check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lo fabbwaitin to . order food at i:1 AM on a Saturda morni •_ There were . 15 cars waitin• in drive u• his is a very poRular coffee shop. _. - '7117n is 14;'''' if A 70,7a _. ws C 0 Dl HL.. r • , `'« December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net, 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant. fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application; Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq, ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. t--. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, i Signature: ,.__. P Nameorr --t - rao ' \._u 1 t4-1 Please Print Address Acorn Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 /--\ 0 Mit fIe iv,, trill s, m e 6 r �, a ::... ��," 4( J�( Ta -----,-- '---4, -. .- - . - -. ‘,,\ - ..„,,,, „.:" , - limipor IL _........... „ ,,,, ,, ;',..4' ''''''-'' ,,--. ,,,,--,,z:-,;,,,4.4,,,...., . -.:,..-:.,,,, ,,,,4,,,,::;:: :,,--,-,4,>,,-,,-'--, ,,,,, -,,'_„,,,,,,'',:,,„:,:::;::,,,,.,.,:„4 ,- „-,.,. L.,,,, 01464N-.1.,aliiiiiii,,i!''': .. .... s***%**'''.. '7 7 . I 107.7.77rm, .' ' :WI, 141' .4.1*, •,, : ” - :i.1;4111:i.f.,,,4„. ...+24--.1..., —I lig 'sem $ , in 11 • Nilli I . . ..... 3 li . .,, :.. 1 a ' ":7 7 ,Lgl litlf ':/,4,4' , ,,%... iit li! ,I!''''' '":"— ... 1 trig LI 5 1 ti.gisf: 1 12, .1" m .e w `x°2"4 • s '. ✓ *.~.!.•!!!"""'» = . +` "^ � ..,- --- ,:':',7.,;. :i ,,, w° ila :te � ",.. .. �� ,,. _�.-^�,,.,. "°"'�y �,,,. � �"`�:a-„":._ `ate .tea ,�:. ., -� ..,- 'K'g •,wR - • :�- _ 1 _. Xa 'Was this review ...' Useful 4 Funny cool DOD /2/201 7 check-ins First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking /ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! a s sat in t e • rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car strugg e to •et backed out of their seat. .Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hrd my 51-ggest pet peeve is the drinks were ria e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. e . : Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ... ' ,' - t,al JSw 7 La.V - - r 1.41 I lily. vr' v r s I----y, 14 1 Gr (t 00000 9/3/2016 e1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobby waiting tc order food , Alt l on a Saturda marnin• There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a very popular coffee shop. - .,"1': i w '' 3;v: .,. /, u 3 �Je.'" f'-ni ' �`G:' Yi y a. ip ag a.x.. . - y ;P . ..,.. ,n<„ >-;A- � :i :. ' _ Yds 1 -'-i7 COFFEE BAGELS **- 4 ,0) '''. ......... , , ,i 1.0R 9 December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergovnet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the p•-• customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets,' b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on trie south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-sto_rage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. t•—•\ Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, (71 44/ Signature: , Name. /4j77/7a0 Of?)(//f 0 Please Print Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 k �q. � m r 4 iti, 00.40,r „..i; -girap,;:i.4.izz.,:iiiiiizo;wi D 14' VE- H" ltfR ..., .,. f ,...0000-1.00011111111111111r i i''i''''''' ‘.'4? '' ' - - . ci `* 143"1 ' •6:';'tIliiiiiii FUNS* ..,i , ( . ' .'i„. Ammar' of ti N ... I i ., i 0. " ''''' :,F,,if . ,• 1 I N"?.., WI.N.k '''''' a i I kit ti - .6;T:t '..7. 3 v 9„ . .,� w w+ :il.4.: rte"' 1:117,� "` w:: � - .. •uw a U X "-- Was this review 1-H 13 -r )3 Useful 4 Funny el Cool DO 1/2/2016 ,igok, 7 check-ins . First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking /got/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e *rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car s rugg e to gqt12g61 LSecond for drive up it was extremely slow. hird my bigges pet peeve is e inn s were rnaoe sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? Z.,. 140».-1,1.4.,1 V.9/I .f.- IOW 1 %.,I II 11 Rty .,.... = ,,,.,......N.—es 1 E-/, I-I ler- (1... ,-- 00000 9/3/2016 • 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. je There were 32 customers in line in the lobb waitins to ' i order food at l'.. . A Y on a Saturda rTiornirlf There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a very. l r coffee t,\ shop. / ....,...................... ,..., ow:,iix,,,,,„,,,„,:„„,-..f„„„1,wy--i - ,,:- „4 14:;,,71," ,t1),., ' '''' / • ...„,.....• rt, . i ,-,,;V,4.","" ' .0G- *2 x- ' ''` ' ••.,-Pr..:,,a,,tle'.4"','''' fl, 400,'"'.74. 'f'4f*. • " CARIBOU rit4ST1111*1 OOS. 4 ''''-7- COFFEEa BAGELS _ ..., DRIVE TI-IR:,,I Millir P '1 1 * I, ,--- t 0 • • 4 : „.> ..,...... .. ,., , . ..... .,„.., i "' December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq, ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant. fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A ; Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application, The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: ("7 Name. IA / ek" Please Print Address ?../13 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 • ',,:4,:s-i,:-,i x "7' 7. :. iF ^'e2 fa '�"E i Vic ; ,'-k,,,,,,,,,,.., ,,,,aa,",,,,,, ,, a.,,,,,,,.,:i:;4,.1: 211!:°4-0.':;•;;;.z., 41,-it.,-0,:si,"!.:1-5:!;;'?;:!::-i,,i'i4m,,, ,,,,,i',..:4..::-., :........::. ,,,..::::,,':„..:..;,, ,,...,„5,,,,,,....L,: ' ;,,, .-''''t :1,--,„,..,,,,,;,,,,,1!;;,,,..,,:::, ' .. , , ,.. , k. `' h.,,,daillliillIl ��I 1 91 III , I �$, •lfi i" t � � � , ry 3. i.. <« g:..q•. 1"4 1 ! II L i �- 1 ll I °~ . ' t 1 .1"" i 0 I t: ,li ....r., ...... . 11 ...: t• 1 r 1 _ I ,..: .,,,, ..:*ft Et ' fr: , * RI 1 I IV ',q .... - • '''': - i . 1 ''' '" ''"' ."' : 1 • I I I , . :1". !' :‘,1 1:i1.• 6 2 '?'..... 1.3'''' '''''' :*-:- ' ' itl 1 - i 6 Wisl: ii -,4 '''' ''""! ',.., : ' ,,,' 1... : ,, f ... .: .... ki! .r! .,,,„' .,,,k, . ... ..-..,. .T.L., :r ,, : - _ w..4 . osi , __.i.-....... ..... ..: ..,..:. ., .,,,, ., , ,!,,,,,,::,:,. ist iwt...,, ,,,:.,. ... . , ;,.,.iiii...i .,.:1;. , „,, „ .�, ,,. - --._.„,,7- ,,,,.„::- -:. 7 ...,„„..-.i ......-4.1 7.-::::— .7.-;'..7.... '?",...r: :r,;:::::;', r <f a l0 a '"`'was this review ...? 1-4-1 1 B Useful 4 e Funny Coot COO 1/2/2016 11144 7 check-ins 0First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking z;lotid_rive up lane set up is horrible!! '* s sat int e * rive up • , lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car s rugg e to •et backed out of th it Second for a drive upit was extremelyslow.. hirci m . ,� y Mg-eV g"`gest pet peeve is the-drinks were me sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... l'll give it sometime before I stop back. 44 'MO 7111411k'k Drive thru located in AEI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ,..? ,3 *.Icrt.. r.. ... .r esssr r vvvI i. E ft i. 16 1 00000 9/3/2016 0 1 check-1 love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan geek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches, There were 3 customers in line in the Jobb waitin to order food at • Tana 5aturda mornin There were 15 cars waitin• in drive u•, his is a ve •o•alar coffee . shop. s .....';..,,,,..4,‘ , ''' CARIBOU BAG it... CO 4 I'VE l'iwiRi i ,„,1.° ,?4,4./kA Wo. - - 4 4 < ,k9 December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmicit@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, induding but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations, Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community Le. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B. Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads, 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application; Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehides. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, _ Signature: ir - esolaga I-44 .e,rre-- Name: ° Please Print Address 1141 3 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 1111, . f s 0$' ,yam a o y „,,,,,5) 4 s x WI t fg„' ;;:iiiii,„4:".40. 0%-o-- ,,:'/011111WV:' 0(.;;..4:'1:::.:': i .:.% - .-,.-4 Ak.... •••44-°-...- -.. A ma ! 14 1 ' -- - - -' 'i . III i I:1 ,....„ 'if . 71711./! :..„2 ..,. ._;# 'It 14; ':1 ' i'l ' '.i.l, ;t..:i,., ,r--, - .. 1 --,-. : lialittlill ' - 11 i 1 .. , ,,I ill II 10,...„ s ..cid ,..,, a..„;,,... 9 , .. . ,,,,,, ::. ,;.,.. 5 0 ij iii,..L.;;-_-..,,3.7.: c,.....15., -. =, ....,..- .” ..0 'a_ ..,... ,.„:.,..;. '''.'..: ' '•,.'''. I- ! ' - -I4,.: ,„.„3. 7,`,7, : ' . ... ,,, _ „..:_„......,..„._. it,...-i, - - ,...,, ,,,.; p,....., .,...- ;,....!! ..- --- ---- ------- , , _, --- .......7 ....7„-_-.-,,,, ...i,,.,'',,,;.. ,;',„.. *:...-.,,.. i 'Vas this review ...? -' . '1 `r B ii Useful 4 e Funny Cool DOD 1 /2/2016 Ilk 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ;.,,,lot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! • s sat in t e *rive up lane as there was no where to park to go insidwatched car after car srug-g e to et backed out of their s ot. \--Second fora drive up it was extremely slow.Jhird my o� ge pet peeve is e oral s were ma•e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. f a Drive thru located in RFI _ Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? Ita urs ' , _ , , , va,wi 1 y %.J..;iuL- ,*14" . _ c_ 1-1- 113 f ,--N 000 9/3/2016 e1 check-in , bagel with butter blueberry Moines toasted eek West Des sandwiches. I love the Jordan Cr breakfast hot, new . and This is the and bagels and honey. 1 bb • for coffee inline in , • the 0 e were Ther locationcustomers . e 32 amine aturda m 1 r coffee 3/ There were 5 on a .0 su a I at : - his is a ve waitiris to (716rje;;;a -9-1*-1 drive u., or . in [tins 15 cars wa - - .._.......... _ shop. , , iStY.:"" ,---• .0,1"214612,**- - ..... ,.,. „.....,„-.:4-,.,, .1;.• „,' rit*statm **--. cAR•181)1J E LS .1P..._4 & B S A • F. E 0 F E C .,.._._, 414 Irk!V r P I „.' i , (.1. , to ... 40.k. December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,2552560056225525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel, Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging lacilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08,02 Restaurant. fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is c early a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit 13: Is E, review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project, Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT shou d be specified as an air conditionedenclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no 7utside stor.ge of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A bLffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckslone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from est Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MP UC. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which iicludes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: Name: Altt14oct. Please Print Address -7 Y3-0 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 111111110 gliimispi a4 a `t"L 1 \ / / �[ .. � 6 , -:-. ',k ' . .. , - \ Ak ..\ , „ , .... ...., ....,.,,-, , - , ... .. ,.:.-,,- .;.,,,,..,. -.,..:;,i;,:i,„-..:::.;...,,,,e,,,zi,,,4„:„..;:zit.-1 kk of ii /. 4,4N s_Yna, ... 1 3tosy? ^,a�e�dfi a� gy ii .J/c '' .. - x tAtt/�.... bra £ £ ro-,°^• .« F P - 1. o - - n" Ai ri , it ..„, 1 , , ill.. .... _. . i ' . • 1 . . .....pi I , - I 11.-1. : !,!E. i.f,„:..., .,..„.4 a 4 ''. #'.1 '' '''''4 ris . ' ' - I : i;:::' ii ',.1,; !! !! ! ! !!! l'''-1,' !!(!i. '.6 •' ' -- ' - isO iii a III III 1 1N7 * . M- „ ,1 sal girl IA' , ".''''''*#' ' :.� .tea �„.... �' ` `: ,.....e r ,r„ `�„" .:ate*°°° - -" ,w* • tn , -- -- ...» * ;r,,,.,: �,, —;;,,.. ""-^" ate' -------- -- -------- - ., ,::. y .: ate": -. ea 1 ''"-Was this review ...? 141 r3 B Useful 4 e Funny Cool DO 0 1/2/2016 icheck-in First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking /ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! * s sat in t e • rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car strugg e to *et backed out of their s ' econd for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my pigges pet peeve is e •nn s were ma•e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. r9 Ham, Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review —? '------- 14 PI i (___,1 On000 9/3/2016 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobo wa tin• to order food at Y cin a Saturday mornin .,`.There were 15 cars waiting ire drive up. his is ave •o•ular coffee � shop. .. . _ _............„,...s.„,.....__ Fyi ' _.. . Y St AG h- COFFEE *,...4. DRIVE H . �x t t December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergovnet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08,02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code, ExhiPit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking si uation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in_the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles, With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. t•—• Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to ail neighbor'ng communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, I Signature: f A ,C• Name: Ivitt-cin ( Please Print Address —9 A 1 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 '' Ate.;. ' �. 'I- ''‘,',!' 1‘71.0 \C.,,-'(i,, 4 ti 4'' , . ' ''''4''''' ' Zi:Y ji - P ,,., ., ,, , tea -' ...'�.,. ask_.,-. ��_:. ,, , .,,,„ 1 ,?.., .,..„ , .<-, „„ „ iL,,. i „„,,,,,,„,_ ,....owitiollISIV „. .. , , , . i i.,:.:P.1,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, .....iiiiimilliiii, sei!!!!!!!!! : ';'' ''' 1:::' -''''''''''' i *' '' 1' : : p igiH x#t. gyp t„ aa. i -r 7 I - 1 1.1.111 .., 6................ �- .... _ ....i 1 et i f losiOil' itillt „ , 1 ..11!!! ,,,i,r,i,,,,,,„:, ..,,,,!1 ,,:s, . --:7 ,.., : w.i 1: is AR * ti !„. w:,.ti...„ 3,, - 03, ,;11,.._ ........ A i iii 0^. —I — "" —It 4 , _..,,,,-- — ' -----7".. . = 7,-•-,-.. ....t7..------ .-------.-----:7-,,,,;. ---1*-----' '7---- --- ......- ..7.-----7 .------..- ..: :-::',-;i „ o :3 ., w ,D - •01 0 1 81 ; 1 ill.0, !F:. ' **W''' r* IS re''' 1 ii 14 'i ” maw r 1.z 1 as this review ...? -'`1--. 14-1 r3 -r B C) Useful 4 e Funny e coo, 000 1/2/2016 IQ 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking at/drive up lane set up is horrible!!i As I sat in the drive up lane a there was no where to park to go inside I watched ,- \ car after car strugg e to get backed out of their sp2t. .--,S;------cond for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my 56-§TT—IDe peeve is e ionn s were rnafie sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. ' . ,.. - ,„......„,....... ,, .1..A..,s . . , Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review -.? , A.J..,a t ' ,,,s II E y r ,isr 1 _,,,,,g lal — : ' ''''S ' -,i ... 1L1 E 1-1113 1 --- , ,,,,n 1 0 000 pl frig 0/3, ,_ 1161 I*. '''j e1 check-in bagel with toasted blueberry 1,. West Des Moines I love the ereets. sandwiches. , new Jordan breakfast butter and honey. This is the hot, n d bagels and . w_ Lina to inthe in line . There were location for coffee an 32 customers _ morning, were There T A At V on a Saturcia ular coffee 0 o• lobbr aii food at *: - isa ve . his order . drive us. in i 5 cars waitintP__. __„=_. _,, _ - shop. 'k". ' '';'•i,,—iilik? .s4t7i."it" "/'41411142. • ',:d1A.,".4 ,-',1, I^ "*,„,,..7"; -17-1- ' ";:31: ::' ; ''•••";lia1,',!,:,t'il'..iri',t?,Pffil';',., :-..te: 4- ' ,....... 1 0.4 altos- gINSTa p „ir 1 cARISaU gp BAGELS -- - • E E F F tft' C 0 r THRII LyR1V- I v , .. *., ... ,--- 1/0 _., ,.. . • I ., . . . - ..,. - December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergovmet , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft_ per 33+ acres, VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres_ Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2 BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling_ Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinders ce not only in Parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: Name: A ,..i. Please Print ,--- Address 3 (-1 ‘) Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 ...--\ • ..v.v,„ „...„,..* ,.,-.,:z1 eQ g n w' ilie,-`,-1-,-;;;;;!;,; gttj/{`r TSR vi 4 , , Ifk*d-'14 4:'''',i -1::iiif -.4.. .;i:,,,,,,,,,i: , :_:::,f,,.,,: t ,,,,,i. ..,-—I - '''', 144444 ' \\ r y •s+s«'a , . . ' '041)01 ' tam. ..,"8t ..... 1.,e — '''L',4t. ftifill ` */ fi : ; !r• 1:1:''' : ,si:‘, 4"(1 r,,,("!,, :„.",i.z4-,- , . , tea siessommom xi g 'III I 471 Cr I • ig Ilk 14i 1 .' S IF 4 ... � y � ..�., am 'v_ ' ''''''' ''''''''—'2:.— : w . � � l'' ''.l'' ''. ,m� —. 1114, w µ� '�+�... y -.+«�.: ...-_ <,«. '" ^sem, . .... s —,r&,asffi ,aia Was this review 141 r3 B 0 Useful 4 e Funny 63 Cool 00 1/2/2016 7-ak 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking at/ drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e 'nye up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after cr strugg e to get backed backedoyfflJt. LSecond for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my i5iggesf pet peeve iglh-T-a FriRI-were ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review -.? - N.,U" ilisay .,... V 'LA ,....,,„...,I.1,4 1 ‘`'' 1 ( .,....'"'' 41 13 I L'-' '.'. 0 0000 9/3/201 6 • 1 check-in bagel k West Des I love the toasted blueberry bagels and breakfast sandwiches. with buttermanadinehsoney. twoere and for coffee location n.ri There were 32 customerswaiting, There .. on a lar coffee •oPu in line ve ../ • ----d---. .--r, .--focia—gl.)"57klVit . up. his is a °r ecars waiting in drive 15 ..,....._ ,..„.....,,,,,st— shop. . _ &"*. ;4•A‘744 t';',46''''-4,11.41:3714;It F"ii:Alte*4- 1-".- „1,',,2/ 44411i-47-'i , , \i•I', ' ''''' '''.4rikiteil . 'S ; - f',,,7,-L- ':,;;;T:1,-.. ke,lirr,;: ,-6 ,mir.z.1:A---77 ,..- "k""'"'. ;.: 4 ....--, 4: ,,,,4::. atm sit _, 1114ST OS lir 4 ,II‘. c - 1 eAftleau BAGELS , „ 0 F F E E DRIVE 1 Nr.f.'"' ,...i, il , 0 . .... , .... • f -,' * December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties, These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1 . DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant. fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhit2jt A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east cornr. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated, Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hindergnce not qnly in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: ' 1. Name: LLpyp G. L & N (, 1LI-1 Please Print /"" Address 7 2- Ii 7 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 • ,;,-„,-,7? „,,,,,,„.., ,. .. , 6, LI • fir'" 4 ,�, sr r� is A �« f ✓' ..u. ' _!IA nig,,., MA 44111111.0 ,,a., 1 .., ,Iiiiiim,::,.,,.:, 1. 3 I &6 $ i Ait 9 �..xu. - .. 13 i ..- - ' pi • ' I 1. . .. .. ,, Ili gi f'1,1' , ,„,,,,,, .macS. x,< * _ R. ...! al' li 4 w , I :! 1.. ,„,„, .... , , .., , ,,.•, _,... a 41„ , is., ,,,,, ,,,,T - .„: r*""" ..mom'if ;.-r- ' wx. - . ...,2.... ,...ro-'m"�°"'°' .... � � _.� '"'wr -,7,„-,„,...--_,f.--.: smm'm v...' ,----.,--- ,.. f."'"" v`c a --Was this review .., ' B Useful 4 0 Funny E3 Goof DOD 1/2/2016 check-iris First to Review riew I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking /at/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e * rive up lane as there was no where to park to *o inside I watched car after car s rugg e to get backed taut of their spot. ,Second fora drive up it was extremely slow hird my Jigger pet peeve is e •ren s were ma sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cupflid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'II give it sometime before I stop back. 5% Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ,..'? ' T TJfT 3T 77 ? .„ e,7tiJT 4 Eis 14. I 13 r C___ 00000 9/3/2016 , 946, 1 the --In I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. Theme re 32 customers in line in the Iobb watin• to '4order food at 4) : $ A V on a aturda mornin• There were 5 cars waiting in drive up. his is a ve •o•ular coffee E 1'- 9,,arberneMtegiat shop , m. .1 CARIBOU LW T F O b .>. ,,,,'. COFFEE BAGELS ::""l!e°' ........., ta. V s tv t a e t December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergovmet, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard, Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a"drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditionedenclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4.. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft, allotted to this MPUti The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: /. Name: ‘,/c;)/v-,L1, 7,1 • /(e_ 4 , Please Print Address —72 s7 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 F a Y -.1 Wig, y kVfi.x , k. i f4.:47-t,,!ff:..-''':,'!' .5:;7,-,- -,-.--!:-,;,,ii ''. 4„, KA ell I:- _ i d _ _ ,Pfiill ° t;i'i51ibti , il 1 * ' .. ''''...%''''..,....'::..!..::ewillIlliai::"i""a'*'' ' ' T..1 - 1 .„.- ILK i - --: mff r .111 :111mm -:;,. Li, . .., L//////iitiII1If' ffi 11 I=I*, , :* V. :O. 41 02 .4, _ _ , „...„ .,, "r �� ;.a Mr.� .�' ,. HI ,--Was this review ...? -‘'t.,A-1 13 B Useful 4 e Funny e) Coal DOD 1/2/2016 Ight 7 check-ins tit First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking otidrive up lane set up is horrible!! 4s sat in t e * rive up lane as there was no where to park to ea inside I watched car after cr struggle to set backed out of their soot. LSecond for' a drive up it was extremely slow.fhird my Jigges pet peeve is e 40 n n s were a-Me sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... give it sometime before I stop back. I. 51* zwfr,' Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review p•-•-• December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov,net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft, gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling, Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited_according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: Name: ' P Cor(_/1c Please Print i"\ (-5 / Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 3411'9 1110 r x r a fAk DRIVE o s ,,,,,„44 i ' ''.4.:ti:::' 34:,,: / Iti mill ,., pe' 4. A - <f . al 1. MO kms, /III . _ I 1 i if: , , jorii ,. 11, , 4.a,,, ttc,:.I ,,' : 0; IA s,.4,' 1;ow, .„-s I i —A — "'" --'s ',,, 1i ' ' '7: ' ii.- - siowl!•,.. : r ,,, • /!(`- , - - .4116E6 ... r �x++w` ..remix ' 4 —°D' -.- 5 Bw "'. "' _sdw�w' ewlM'w _—' -- „.. -+a. , _ , ,-,,,,,,i,10,,..04...,e0. , .0.., ... ,., 5r w Was this review ...? 141 r3i B C) Useful 4 0 Funny e Cool 000 1/2/2016 7check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking , lot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! As I sat in the drive up lane as there was no where to park to so inside I watched car afar s rugg e to get backed out of their s at. \ Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my biggest pet peeve is thedrinkswere ma e sloppy". No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... 111 give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? E. 141 13 1 P"-`\ 9/3/2016 e1 check-ire I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lob waitin• to t order food at ': 1 A Y on a Saturda morni • There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a very popular coffee �, shop. _rw r .. oz':�, r-.,. � aux ��y ts„..e.,,,:r7" ,,,,,,o ty: i i 1 0' o Po ...- O F F P o s E L 4 DRIVE " r _ fix• -7, , .. m,. 11.0;-s t . • • s December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Corbyschmiclt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project, Exhibit C; Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads, 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. to-6N Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: 9 . Name: Please - Please Print Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 r ti �a } ttit.. �wa av ! RtV '� p . . ,tiP3,4-.4" GAY,b1,:' „, ...,,,-,0-: ,A ,,N ksli., ,,,-, \ 4.,, iky ... _,.. ;„,,,, „ X01 ,>"�. . ,. - - . . ,,....„,...,, ...iiiiiiiiiilllhi. 3i }- *"K IR votirmidis 3 xis%' FKi ig 0,,:, .. k. \ V .. , ... ) i 01 tVa.1 — -AN 11 I I NA1 t f i I 4 ill , 4 1 S _ , .. - : az; .., ,! ,, ,,,,,, ,,,„,,, ,,,, , s‘mi_..,„,.. .....„ 1, ,,,,,, ,,,,_„, i .:1,..:..,„,...,:iiim..t.,....,,,,,:... ",,,,A. .,..,,,,,7, _.,, . 11 !-- - - -;‘ ,, ,,„ 1":17,, ,,,, ,,,,„, , , ,6,, ,,,„, ,,,,,i:',-,:: ''',. ' - is r '''''' '. .. r --,,,,.,:k4,-'.a" a . ,,T 1 3 ''. i/mss tilt 1'4 II ,, , ikii-' ,,,: ;-.7. 0 ,,, , , ;t: -,'_. ::;.,:::- 1,7.-.:-... -....: ..:,-_,',. ...:-.: 4..,,,,..,---_, 5, ;.7.; ::::.--- S —**5,... ,.M sN �s . . Was this review ...? . B. ,..... Useful 4 e Funny e coal DOD 1 :2:2016 ilk 7 check-ins 0 First tO Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking - otidrive up lane set up is horrible!! As I sat in the drive up lane as there was no where to park to •o inside I watched , car after caixsrt.199e to get ced out of their spot. Second for drive up it was extremely slow. hird my ,--. biggest pet peeve is the drinks were made sloppy._ No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. i, . . .,,,, ,, 7 - -tr-...•4:;----,-, 4 ,r, ,.„ , .4. Drive thru located in REI — Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? g vu....3xaa - assrear" a"® s Ey, i-1113 -i- (t 1 - 00000 9/3/2016 1 check-ire I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the Iobb waitin• to order food at * ♦ V on a Saturda rrlarnin• There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a ve •o•ular coffee il ' shop —�'- ...- S W �-, ,A t_.74::;',.' * � kms.� ` ;'4:'::::::-::'7''' 4' '' '''';'d;'..'' '41'.t***144''' '''''':;t.:Z':4S*' "i4d4'1:: ''?:41;*'*'1/'''4""11:*144''' ' 1 CARIBOU T T ,.,OROS. �-: COFFEE & BAsELs ii DRIVE, t , tFa December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562 25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" °Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restau ant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess 01 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B. Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project, Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential tor traffic hinderance not only in parking tot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: 5Th-ceekt- He-r Name: Please Print Address 7 2 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 iilitlit I t yY fi „F h' .gi k G F .' , . lob ._ ''..k**.,',;-•"(fN : .';0403/f,.::..0-^;., '' ' -'''':'::::::'"''''''':''''''.'J,',ti..::''j::::C'.....::...„..„. .t.;,” r DRIVE I --fid am. ..�` 14 XF; k,, ,i .:-,),,,,ii?-4-,•,J,:„. ;-,-,:iii,,...,,...,..,,,,,,,.. .. .. . ,: 44,, ......„-. .. , . , . .. t �_ nap VIMiI .. .....,,,,.... .. .iopor I .ii...1..1.;;!;11.,,,,,7771:i i*---- x y 1;4,#:04-901,1.,z., v sa3 zap,: t -" ^ _ - 3 ... .t. z.! ,.itilit. ic ilf: spill ill . --- -„44 RLQ -_.. !;,-' ''.. .'''::!' , n ii i-::' '5 i g,..,- ii,:i-4., , �, .. � .a-. ... �„ � ` � ����`y �ir.E��,..;.,+ ter, ,,,,-: ,., d i�',,....'..„7.4,40,!' � ...�4 � 8 ,::::::7:::::7;.:77:771710 3 ._.. r,; Was this review ...? r3B ED Useful 4 0 Funny e, root o o o 1/2/2016 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking . ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e . rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched cArAt_e_r et backed out of theins ot. Second fora drive up it was extremely slohird my ,..� biggest pet peeve is the drinks were ma . e sloppy.., No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'Il give it sometime before I stop back. 44 Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? A„..ms's v€u s:.- t 1.41 1117 `,w w.F IJ r r.-----,4 14 a 13 -I - C___ --- 9/3/2016 el check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the Iobb waitins to order food a1 on a Saturda mornin! There were 4 15 oars waitinc in drive u•, his is ave •o•ular coffee shop, . , ..:__.... a_M_� Ai g, z� 1.1, I y sa. t � - " � cAtainou ! ,Z,4',., '' gr'' COFFEE BAGELS ..,- -1 ' II DRIVE .?i,',' 01 ' ***°1M WP IS "m :IA.,: l s s • qiq: _R.x - M .. December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone" and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant. fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east comer. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will aenerate and the potential for traffic binderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-stor-qe warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft, of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: (.--1 Name: 13/,t1/4A ez Please Print 6_5 0) Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 io- 14,,,,,,,;,. IN a :;;Z ...rte/ s #'4,=..:. ,v, _ -',.'-':,_°-,--,---f . _ i:. 1 �r - a I i ..,:li,,,, *,.<,„, ..91, UN �, i�.ra,, n.n Asa st s r } °. } c k r t . .Eli . k.....,.. ,, :::::::4;. f,t : : ,,,,,,,, i,„,„:„ ,.7,, i,.:I... ...,.. ...„_,, ....., . .. _it., . i .., ..... : 1 an mil u I . . ,.. Was this review ...? 0 Useful 4 0 Funny e Cool 0 0 0 1/2/2016 7 cherk-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only ,coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking lot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! As F sat in the drive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched -' car aiijra--'6i--.S1yugg e to get backed out of their spot — Second for-a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my .--, b:gges pe peeve is e ern s were ma*e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. { . tr , .. , -7,.......i.--...-/. ,--, Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? `LT NJ,N..,1 1--;',/: 1-1 i Gr t„7 i _,.... --- 00000 9/3/2016 0 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the Jobb. waitin• to ilisiffis order food at e: I A IF on a Saturda tyy_...igrm.,,c1__ ___There were 15 cars waiting_ in drive up. his is ave •0401-liar coffee ‘ shop. "s, , .__ -,- ,....... __ •. :44 ..,,, ..,,.. ,--, .,--,,,z.,,,,,---.4.•-..-ww„...,-,,,,,....„.v.,10:40..., ,i:,./...t--,:z-,-; .t.-"---'Jo,-v., 'Im---"4-st‘>A2..4.4, ,,f,'75 ' is.., / ?1,-•,'-.A'„In:4140,u*--'mw~:'7° '° ' , 'cv' -,--wa- ' A 0 1 I COFFEE,-An i sou rINsTelf4 titOS4,,, 7, COBAGELS go liktVi THRt.:‘ I is t - ,,,,,,, I ...-- - r-,4 .4;:' -i.; ***• • ' '— '4i-4'. ... , - s December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReisch Ocolliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek APUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated, Exhibit B: s a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes_for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Drwill be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd, onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage, There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. ....... Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive .., benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respecffully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, „4„,...„1 Signature: , t--.4- (2' Name: //1/..\ ease Pnnt .0-4. ? 5" Address 7 3Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 4 ms ' ebt - :- " . , . . . , . ... , leri„, vo I , $ .,e � ''',:,,f:(,,,,, X� to V. -101 it � , f� hi„ ,,,,,,,,,,,,. a illE1C''''''''."' <.;,,,,,,,-'' i;?;',1'.' ',1,54,1 • i'''''''l''' ,st "::;',:iiir;';:;-::„,,,,' prif;7,,;?,,,,K , ,, . ..,_, : , 1 eft 1 5i, 1.i, ....tii lA ; z ,w.,7., :7 lik toll . _, . . . ;, 71 ii .,, t II IN P:0 ,„,,,,„ „„ ..... 4,..,..,„:., .4 ''''' - i I 'f ' — ':,. m "'"' ". el 0 111a ,W ,„7.7-1 ,...1 512,.:1.—w'' : 0 11111* - o „ +i® " rr, ny �; � ��., � ... Was this review .,..? `1 141 r3 T. B , Useful 4 Funny Cool ODD 1/2/2016 check-iris 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review ibased on. The parking ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! s I sat in the drive up lana as there was no where to park to so inside I watched car after car s rugg e to *et backed out of their seat. end for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my\‘, ,--, Bib-Test pet peeve is rin s were ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. q Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? ..rxe..1 aI I rtarrf E' vaLaI s fl - i 11 �, % 9'/3/ 1:)123 e1 checK-In I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobo waitin• to " order food at • on a aturda morni There were 15 cars waiting in drive up,. his is a ve .00_, ...„lr coffee .,7,,,,,,,:,,,i;,,,,„:::,:,,,,,,,,,,,ki:,,,,,:li,,,,,,04,a' '� : ;" u. . ,.« .., ... moi. 4 it' COFFEE Ei AG E LS ' 17111r,„.„,,,,, :A µ .ms:. December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@collieraov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated• Exhibit Bs Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. ,r1 Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft, of the original 150,000 sq..ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Sig nature I `41.4' &Air 4 Name: &EE Please Print Address /a.2 6 S Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 ,'7'...'„P„','''' gitit axe , %i /,✓ , �.4 DRIVETHR I rl IIIIit , Ii a i tilli fl ,i4i.;,A.i-4.-:it,.-....iiit 4Pct,tttik: , i ti I : ' - •' '; I.'Initenue-71 . 1. 1. 1---i ' m litiotaiiii. 115.) ,,,,IiiiIii , ../ 1 i.. ..„:.. ,..... ,...... . T K 1 ooitill .:‘......ii .... 7:;:::.1 , ..:„.1 . ,._. *ialle1 i [(II ¢fit. „ , . ..,...„. 0 ,... .. .i.7 .... .. ,...aC4 _...„„ .... ,:.7— -_ ....^ .".,:.. ...'" 1..m. -,,....", .'",.„. 4 I , ,„ , . i”. :::':.ii.,:r, :..... 7:-. ,=..:,,,..,..:: ...;:,.,., ,,,::I.T.- :;,,,,, .---:„ f7-..- ..,...;,,,,',,-, - m.. < ..- x ^a,.yn,,, ' 5 �, �s.<".:,fr".� ' �,w" .m v,W^�a✓': hc�„ „ar Y $ Was this review 131 B CI Useful 4 e Funny (F, Cool 0 1/2/2016 -gati 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking "4ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e rive up lane as there was no where to park to oo inside I watched car after car s rugg e to get backed out of their spot. ‘t Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my bi..- estIpet peeve isthewere ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... give it sometime before I stop back. - 4 Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review —? v Jvua t.. uu Iafir. NO Ejjt3r 4 .. 0 0 0 0 0 9/3/2016 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobb waitin• to order food x7711 on a Saturda morning., There were 5 cars waitin• in drive u•. his is a ve •o•ular coffee shop. A, � ���,✓/ a w. x ' ry I.- COFFEE BAGELS ., ,,41: DRIVE II ,fl • • ,L r ti December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliQrgov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft, per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable_ Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: is a review by customer which is directly related to_the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditionedenclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr, will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property, Respectfully, Signature: 69 c......—, Name: -"- & Please Print .0.–N Address --2.,/, 3 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 .---N • / h�1 b :: �i f T(,iA, f - a y Baa _ A r ... lull __ - ; iiia ; .f...: 0,i.. 054* IiHilnlAtit ' -..-4- .-. iit ' ' ., -. espe.orstimrtr. if 2 V104 ,.„..„ �+na 1 A ^ 7 1 iiii ', . I 1 I I ir 111 IF . :. . :::: 0 g i ,ate; Irv, -1: , "` s... i 7.7.:,.„ 3:. . z.. ....„ ...., 4 h ,,,,„7 _ ;. _.,,. ..e.+ ,:� ,., iii'=�-£: ,_/,.ry 8 ,., -1-1 13 B ---,Was this review .. 1I- .? Useful eFunny e) Cool ODD 1/2/2016 7 check-ins Of First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking /pt./drive up lane set up is horrible As 1 satin the drive up ' lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched \ carAfced out of 11-iei Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my 3iTg-e-s-FTeriDeeve is e form s were maie sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... lll give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in RE! Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this tire ' t Es. i—i a 13 T k--- 00000 9/ _ 3/2016 t'd 1 rherk-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and. hsoney. This is the hot, newWestDes mote Jordan Creek and 'tins to the Jobb wa location for coffee in line in bagels and breakfast sandwiches. were There were 32 customers --- at 'I: I A V on a ( j5 cars food . I r coffee _ . sua hisis a ve a There drive up. Saturda morni 0_ 15 cars waiting in ,., _....... ...,,.......„.._„7„...2,1.010.4 ik‘ shop. - ,---, eARIsou eiNSIIIN BROS, „.,. . .t. 4. AGELS . E B - ..... 4 I.. cOFFE DRIVE THREJ Fix Oa ow 0 0 t: • .,. ' December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischi@colliergovnet, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant. fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e, A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amou.nt of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. 1 '-'• Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: Name: -."-JL /74- r Please Print Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 --, 0 1 „ k .' -” ` L � . , ' 11- %,4 ,.,.."),,,4 ...." .'''..?';'.- :"',-.:': ° �, , , gr*LP � �;' ,;fir, r. t/ - I P ,. . --'''' It\ 40 1 11 E e .,. f ted «w ' « ` "` ,.� "^ . , ,p N .,.�,. �:nw , ,, ' oma ; ;%, iW ' ssysa yy �, .rg.. Ems.,, ' _ ,: "`: ...:r ...x,,...i'., .-was this review ...? - - 3 Useful 4 a Funny Cool DOC 1/2/2016 7 tech-iris Fiat to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking at/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e • rive up lane as there was no where to park to •o inside I watched car after car s "gee •et backed out of their- c t. Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my Biggest pet peeve is e inn s were ma•e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. *91N to Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? E 14 1 13 I will CODDL3 9/3/201 el check-ire I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan geek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There we customers in line in the lobo wa tine to ,' order food at on a Saurda mor. •. There were 15cars waitin• in drive u•, his is ave .c •alar coffee shop. - ,�` ..,.7:::„ '" 040-'' . •-- a R o'S. r.,,. 4 .: ,,, t' R1 sFo u EE t ,44,4 „ F BAGELS I.: 1 ii ii k 1 III V * 9�. December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr, Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergovnet, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@cothergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sqft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has slated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditionedenclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. r--- Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighbori g communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, 7-- ' ..," -77 Al 2 Signature: Name: 6\--- i,E c I i Oil S Please Print /---\ ? 5— Address ? 7 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 atif?;y, •x` F j � r„ {Hp 3 ,, . k '' s,„ fie•" z is „ ffi• . ' '''' 4: 7..7.7,....., ,,,..i I so ,1,3 ,,,,,,, 't I:* l'...' ' . mi ' I ' ' ' . i ,. — ' ... s M Was this review ..„? 141 13 -r B 0 Useful 4 e Funny Cool DOD 1/2/2016 7 check-ins First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking liotidrive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e onve up lane as there was no where to park to io inside I watched car .2t!L.ceto getcked out of their spot. Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my 0-el pet peeve i§"Th7u-7-1Fs-civere ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... give it sometime before I stop back. V it AN\ Viffk: Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? N-4, 14113 00000 9/3/2016 checK-In I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobb waitine to order food at *: $ A Y on a Saturda morning, There were 15 cars waiting_ in drive up, his is a ve .o.ular coffee shop. fh'" ‘,,,41416H-77aio,c-I 7(14 CARIBOU B1NSTEIN BROS. COFFEE BAGELS DRIVE THREi ( 1 • "441 • • 1 a I December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities, 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment, The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling, Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) he following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A: Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application; Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no ou side storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem_ Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. (---\ Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: Name: r 50 Name: C et4tIV R‹ L Please Print Address/I 1° A° Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 --, 0 n a git, tea,. � t ; : - _ � �. 4' . r. t ist g' Y 04000111111111110111111111111111111111116, .iiPIV!I s T I,hMili (f.c,,,, :1!!!11151' ,-.-' ' ', ingto.,"4iii!'.g?i, . ;i!. . 111 II 11 it.. - - 1 ri ill,..!I.: Ir f ...:' 0 1 _ 2 -,:-.., 1:::.1 rk h Mil II .{-i# '' 't 41 . . -A.. la 11- 1 1 goo It 14:1 4 ... /It .,. .4.......... ,„. , , . _ _ _ ,4114 A r Was this review ...? . 41 n )3.... -1- Useful 4 e Funny ,, Cool 0 a 1 / / Q1 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e * rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched \,_, car aftercrstrug+ o •et backed out of their soot. Second fora drive up it was extremely slow. ° hird my 3i ges pe peeve is e •rin s were ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. 1:- ....;,-- **.t.:. Drive thru located in REI - Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? s„,,-,..„‘„, I ,„,,,,so 17 I vs' ,,,.. - %"#- , E 14 i IS T- C.-- .)( - ,..-. DOODD _ 9/3/2016 • 1 cherk-,n West Des Moines I love the toasted blueberry bagelwithwithbutter and honey. thoes. This is the hot, new Jordan location for coffee and bagels andreinbthreeaikofbasbt swanaditiwniec orning„ There were 32 customers / - • 5 Am on a inlinem . I order food at in . There were iting drive 15 cars wa. _ , papular coffes / v_..,.....1„..e up. hisis a very _p _ _o shop- - .4.,/mst.kik' -ft,!,'''''',.':Pt.:1141.,:;.•;., .., ir, STEIN BROS. . : , • lc CARIBOU E - . . '" ,,P1 • .4- ,.. .111 mir , , ,4111, 4" (IFFE 41 DRIVE THRU BAGELS 4 4° j.„,4 .c , . ....., PI "S - - 0., • iii December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliQrgov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the M U1), Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant. fast foal: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes tor this project, Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq, ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Iii Signature: ,� \. � ,/- VName: V ° � L' Please Prifit Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 a rtgl - - SFr ,•„•:„:::,„•:.:,„.,.,,,•„;•....„.......i..„:„.,••••::•:::::•:::„: „,,,,,,13,-,:.!...,.............!..i..,.i..1..1.i.:i..1..,i..!..i.,!.:.,...!.•77::••••'••••::.;,..,-:::-..E.l.,.;1........•-„:„-:::1-..........:.::::•,,,..4.1000,i...„,„.7„.,:„.....!..(3.. !!..1:.1:1.,"......:,::,.L:.....;`,..-.,•,.-4-.:-••:3:::::<",:.:.:.::,!.:..,1,:45.:-,4:111kv.,. .4c,... ,:-.....i-„:i,E.t,-..-::::''':!13:3:::!::::••-71:::".!..,,3 ..ii:1';',::•:,'. . -:.--- :".-•.. „„. . • '..-..•-•-••••-3"7.:',"'334ingiggiiieii330 1.:'- - .)9 r '�� °,_ ., a - - .'. ..� fan raj 125.1333 . ,....,, , ,,,0•00001100001111r „ . . ;.1 • i:,,,..... . tii, I awe i . ,,,... . . 1 111 .fiN ill .. . .!41W--- Eli'i.,,,...,.1.1.:tiiiiii.7 .:74-11-111., 7, .. , i "' 1" .4'''''''''':' i a - I .• i-I--4 Al l'it. iii ...- ,-.'" .. --.. - SO .__ , s. ---,Was this review ...? 1 B Useful eFunny ( 3 Cool ODD 1/2/2016 7 check-ins 0 ' to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking "#.4otldrive up lane set up is horrible!! 'A s sat in t e * rive up lane as there was no where to park to so inside I watched car after car struggetoyethacked. .out of their ot. 1LSecond fora drive up it was extremely slow. hird my Digges pet peeve is e inn s were maoe sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... give it sometime before I stop back. • •tr7.004 Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? V,,,,t‘11/ r''' E 1I 7I T f - \d t3'f.J i fi * 0 0 D 14 1 13 i .... 0 0 9/3/2016 • 1 ch -ire I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. Theere customers in line in the lobo waitin• to order food at on a Saturday_ There were 15 cars watin• in drive u his is a ve'.,.\ •o•alar coffee shop. . . . - i of 'EINSTEIN BAG E 4. ,.... _ iI ww.W,47N. ,,,S,P; ...i.:H0e0f, ' I i • s a December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jumpltrampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A: Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive p lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but aijacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside stor.ge of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone r•—•\ Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, - Signature: / . Name: Please Print ,---. Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 ,---. 0 ;F '(-,''(:' 4 44s. ., :-. T} U r JT1 ;:; . �// / a �� e 0 rfrii g i. t wv / S .>, I I ' ir lerifillif„_:-. ' '-.,-: - :i ''';''A i i :I 7i1 !:*1 -- ''''' —z '',7"' f 1 :. _ "- j—„,,'„,,,:!:77,',,,,,,;'-4,,,,;:,i.lii,:,*:,:„—,,,,,,?;L,,,:•,;-:;:;!?:'!:*i:-,^':'CA!74::'.,'m::I,;,9::,ri,4''--1'5t.'''1''''';;; ,11!:,,.,,,z‘:;:: '_.:.;''e:.''::':,,--''',,;„'''7''":”„'7m7,7,--'*-.:!i;i,i•:,i . / axe''' _ • »„ : tea ,” ,,,, .w„ ,: a 1 Was this review ,.. ` .. -1'' 1 Useful 4 0 Funny Cool DOD 1/2/2016 IQ 7 check-ins ft First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking of/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e . rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car s rugg e to •et backed out of their soot. ,Second for a drive up it was extremely slow jhird my 5Egest pet peeve is the drinks we ee mrade sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? M. I 14$41 Sy NO s., 00000 9/3/2016 ,---. check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobb waitine to IT order food—at7g-135- Pro. n a Saturda morninveLe 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a very popular coffee f2..T.....--,.. — ;‘ toor.;,. , . 0 CARISOU tINSTE1N RROS- 1",,,,, . ,!4. , -1* BAGELS 4COFFEEa? Divi: I ',114ki , mir fie.,,,,, ,.... y ,s,.. 4 /--- 4 • 0 411 S '''' _ '- , . December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR, FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The foltpwing facility is specified and prohibited according to the NIPUD.,. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit 13; Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project, Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr, will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD, The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, p7,„„i•d< Signature: e Name: Please Print Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 Iv ' Ito ot r *Itft., ..tea.; ..-..,......,,. u.« MIM .r..,. .,. dalltilillialir s +w 6 ,„ 1 1 FA 1 iiii g I� - - .... ow ft of ti 1 . , t .... li ; III 11- - ihi. ;:, it., ,-- ;514-'' 6 I 1 ''.!:' 11 f ! i, ,I1, , , ,, mi....„ i 4 - ir' :-.* - los.' as.:z ,Iii, � � g " e. a II lilt I i 1 "" ,u., a ............ 4 --,Was this review . ..? r3 -1 !. ' Useful 4 Funny Cool ODD 1/2/2016 IQ 7 cl er -ins 0 First to review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! a s sat in t e * rive up lane as there was no where to park to •o inside I watched car after car s rugge to get backed out of their s.ot. Second fora drive up it was extremely slow. hird my -Digges pet peeves e . nn s were mase sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. fl *11 • Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? .v at sv r. a "'"1 r orxrsse E I si.. i l b T.-- (t- /1 0 0 ODD 9/3/201 e1 checsc-In I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobb waitin• to 11 order food at M on a aturda ,.,mor There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a ve o•ul ar coffee shop. aM. riNstelm 0Ro..t. -'4 ',.,, - lit'k- C 6441E E to B AG E LS r...*;,...,,,:o i, 0, :1:?...,,,, ...._..... DRIVE 1FIR° 1 , , - m„, ,i,,.-,;,... P#0,-,, „: ,,,,a t-, . t p 4 • px .4g December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colltergovhet , 239-252-4211 MR, CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1, DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD, Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant. fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a"drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit 6: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generqteand the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended applicationz Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside stor-ge of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. E-"N Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: CName: Please Print Address 7Z 4M Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 a n:3;',,,,::1' k 'w [ '' ,,,„,,,,...,w,„,,„ L DRIVE H :t& yam_ -ssa9lkr�. '.:9-. .,,,..,,:, .immoiggigiillIllIllIllhh„ N'',,,,,.„.„ ...,..,,. , i ''''',,--',:;;;3-;,:,.::7 ;,,--,t-',-----.,--!,,,,--, # 'i '''''' !.:114'itiriSc:i'': ,,;,', i;cfiliit' , .1 m isimaismi I. p i I ,i — , I i.7 ' fliallio.. .... '- ': -,j. 11111 1,7.!,,,,..,,,,,4.,;,..,1 !!!„, ,, ;..,..,,,,„: i;_. ! -, - ,.._ .„ 1 , „4„...t 4 _i .4 _ _ ,. -- ' -ail ''f 11 g„,::+q' ' .+. m az „w ^`• `-"" , ..--i„- - ' � , .,. } ,�r^ ,p`;... Ere ^ :,.._... .,-,,,,,,,,•-:_„:, ,�,.. .�^' E.c.�+ n. " e° t. ----.VVas this review .. .? # B Useful 4 e Funny © Cool ODD 1/2. 2016 IQ 7 check-ins0 - I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review I based on. The parking /ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! 'i s sat in t e * rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched r car after crugg e to •et backed out of their soot. Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my Biggest pet peeve is e inn s were ma•a sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. a4 Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...' ar sr�ces zs r 441 1" vs_rv1 Ey... 1. 1li 00000 9/3/2016 ,-. e1 check-1n I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobb wa tin• to y order food at •: I • V on a Saturda morninl There were 15 cars,\ waiting in drive up. his is a ve •o•ular coffee shop. � _� �. _ �._x �. w j `�, ✓ris''�.., ,. , , ,. ✓gam �; :AA - �r- 4 � CAIBOU� � F E � ... Lr).,v,_ 1 ii R a, Lii 0 . ,..... ye I t /..,z. � �;; s December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR, FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergovnet , 239-252-4211 MR, CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmiclt@colliergov.net, 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek APUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus, Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant. fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application; Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq, ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. ,---\ Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: ar IF Name: 1 4 0 i -Hi ,-\ Please Print ----.. Address --7 1-2./ Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 -----, • ,,,,,i...il,4„.„... .....;. : ........ .„4, Ae4a0 0.4w1, 4,,,,,„,..„..... ._ .:,„44„,„:, t.....„34.4 ,..,„. „....:*,,,..... 4.;.3", „.<,. '--.:':::-",-F,,-„','. �\ „ , ' ' ' - (---, e -- , ,.. ..... ' . -- , s te „ . - ',-,..-- ,-, ,, ,- yam\. :. --. , ,,, ... ,:, ... „,.. ' , ,,. w oRtV TFi$t1 t S„ L.„ Ya\ F .n.*.vb—"';.,....„.:4.3tti"Iktit, , g v .,s.s r s.�+ E3,1 i -,-,',; ,,,,,,„0,,,,,-, 1!,,-,;,,,it,,,F.1,„0:1.1;),.i",,::4441,:!. : 1„ '::',d,:.'...,111 ✓. ,`ar r .. 61:;' f` I 1,1A il ft ill 'A ' - .-.. - III , in 4 I!' 11, 1.,..,.,. i:i;i;', iiiii Y0i, Ell 'i'lii?;:`,4—.4 '''t ,,,,1 1)0 1 'I NI! ; _ _ ... ,,_ t .i iii 4 0-4,-; I a 0, f LI 44 tif, ,1:11 ...4 ." ' '''''''' ' ..,,, tos a 111 I , 111,S' .w. . ..,. : „..;, 77 ' . nick ., 0 4 .., �:•:4.-,.,.-,:-„..:•-: ,,•••,,-'„; 1 ^Was this review ...' ' . c41 Useful 4 Funny Cool DOD 1/2/201 : 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking de4ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! •s sat in t e *rive up lane as there was no where to park to •o inside I watched \car after car strugg e to •et backed out of their sp Second for a drive up it was extremely slowjhird my oiggef pet peeve is the drinks were mace sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I°ll give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? J a ,..„,‘" #41 t-- ' '' m.,., ft ,,,I.,.,4 by, 1.4. lei L----- .,-.... 0001j arib 0 9/3/2016 1 check-in bagel withDes Moines . West I love. Jordan Creek breakfast sandwiches. the hot, new bagels and e the toasted blueberry butter and honey. lobb w !tine to This is and in location rn n There • n for coffee 32 customersfurda 111°- -1 coffee There werec_liv, ron a Sa is e 0 ular — , --- -a-t9:0,- — his a v line in . . the al were order food . in drive up. 15 cars waitin9 ......_ ..... ...... „,,,,,,!;,. .:,,,,-,-4-,k,,;...4kt',:.f'%;• ,, -,,:,id.-7.: . 'ra,-..,,..„,.± :::'').4 '''' eiNTE14 0 c 0 cAf/BOU ,_ .. ....... 11 DRIVE T,,,R.,, EPEE MA ; , tw,,,,;,,,,,,z,•,; F'---.!,,,,g. z,- - 1 , ! IS . - r .,..-- r 110 'oro gliF " Amh, I 6" . " . *6 40 . , , December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Cornprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not &"drive up cafe" as developer has stated. exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review gf business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not on y in parking lot but adjacent roads, • 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. t•-• Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, -of' Signature: — ' .., e Name: Please Print ...-.. Address 7 41 2) Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 1 0 ✓9�n r 'M 1 .%" T HDU �; a (F9 t ` ".. ---,Was this review ... ' ` ,. - 1 C) Useful 4 e Funny Cool DO 1/2/2016 IQ 7 ci c -ins First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! "$ s sat in t e • rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car strugg e to set backed out o their spot, Second for a drive up it was extremely slow, hird my Digges pet peeve is e .rin s were ma•e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. • Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review . . il Es. 14 1 er k.,___ 00000 9/3/2016 .. 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobby waiting i order food at •: on a aturd,a morning There were Ljars waiting in drive up, his is a ve •o•ular coffee shop. _ __ 4,, •, _ r. ,..Isk-.4".------ z- t,...z},,,,,,,,4>i,, .:.. .'.-..1.,:,:L.4*.f:::ixt;:t:.;,,,t14-'0"—.-4-'il'I.2 v'vot,;:a6lizI'vol?e,....Vt.,,,,--mtt,,,,ff'`.111.,.,:t1,,,,-1.:4,::',11',:ae2:, 1nT IH O h ( ii* CC) FFEE BAGELS 4-77-/F, ,.., DRIVE 0 11 N e 1 , • e. 'J1 December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUO, Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 " - f, .4,4.: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics.. a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hjnderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside s orage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: C\i' \N -44 WIF Name: IC Please Print Address e)-- Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 • tito;,,,. s Cdr c r N›. r. ''''' '- ''''','''''''-^,',' i'Vfl. „.-.`g,;'','-,,'.^''''. ,., '',.'‘'',4.,..'' ., ,,. '' - ' N ozit'il,,,,:,-1'- --- \ ,. ..„ .,,, ,. :;.,„.......„ ,.„,„4„,,.. F �WIPP ii '. i'i . - ,....... / , t , ,,,,,,, , ‘, .... .. ,.„. . , ... ,, .. • 7 7of i3 !lib 1111t -,t. !. :, 'i a reig op Fp t , - .. .— , ., - j .inits s 1 ' ' ."' —1 i I I Ill!I f !ifi alf it - NI i:-E' " ' ' '''',Ii '''' — '''''' 7 if 'ill' 4 a 4 i II ' I,,keri i:,,,,'''„ . " :,,,,.. t ... ._ . , NOW .."' ' ' ' ^ .'^' r«. ,147'' rt, F...: t ''' ro.;.41:r..^t1 72,..,'= °Z.' .m., 1:::*,....*0.7 ''''. 'm ."'''''' • ......* ...-:-..,--;„.,-,7, :„..,,,,, .... „-^,.•,,,,,-- .. .. .. zo, � t ---Was this review ...? 141 et 0 Useful 4 e Funny e Cool 0 a 1/2/2016 gU,, 7 check-ins .101 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking /ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e • rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car s rLageto et backeof d out \,,§econcl for a drive up it was extremely slow hird my Jigges pet peeve is e •rin s were mase sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... 1111 give it sometime before I stop back. :wog: Drive thru located in RE] Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review E')( I- j r L' 00000 9/3/2016 el check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches, i There were customers in line in the lobb waitin• to order food at *: 0 A '' on a Saturdayinomirtg., There were 15 cars waiting in drive up) his is a very popular coffee shop a t *fes W.' $ Yam ". !L"/ '-,- 7.77 " .:.'7* e� 6 IP4C A t tNsTelt1 T ()RIVE IFIRti 1 :,L',„,, ,,..,,, '',.,‘hq, -7t,e.; ' :,-7, s t amu . December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergovnet, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 gorbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, induding but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application; Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks, As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage, There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr, Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: 'f Name: Name: -) 6./ Ay /)1e .. Please Print 7,e2L9 Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 • 'yam A � , yip -.---",-,..%.*,,,-, DRIVE f a i,;'4,1 „::,s- 5.zi ' ',', - st,‘ \ .` , --4— „. a'," ' ' .', aHtt,,,,..4,,,,,,..:K",-...- - , 46 �i pe:111.7 i r, _ :, ,, „, ---- . ' ' . ' - , Nel t''.1 ":.?'.• , £'4.4f-: 40*?:„A,,,,, v.) „, not \ i .,. ,.„.,.„„,,,,,,.,,,,,„, ...„,: . ia „ „. . ,r,t:',tctr:' tl°,:kt, ,,=,- • Si i ti , pi 11 ail ..,„._ 01 , , ,.. : . „, . 3 ..... . , 1 . 1 1 IP ii •-• ..- -4, _ /I' °ii. ,,,,,,,, k .. ,, 7...,1, .. , i . ,470 „,,, . , 01 ::.-..moi -.. � ” .....Was this review ...? -'1.-. 11131- B 0 Useful 4 e Funny (e) Cool 000 1/2/2016 44( 7 check-ins , First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking 'Iot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! As I sat in the drive up ' v lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched .., car after strugg e to get backed out of their \„ Second for a drive up it was extremely slow:pird my igges pe peeve is e orin s were mase sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. % - ,.. , = ' lr .. Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ....? _ „..„,,, 00000 9/3/2016 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobby waitingo c ' der food at *. 1 A Y on a Saturda morning There were or . 15 cars waiting in drive ug. his is a very ap_pill_a_r_coffe...? shop -------------._ „,.„„ , ,,,........rwlem. yr t, — - ,, , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,A. ,A.•-°""- ''''''''''''*.':ric-, l'ital, ,' tAkz:',' ''''' i'',7''',,:- '''''..,....,#':::X'.'• ',..ibii;:ik.7.'1.4:,,,Y:".'":'.;'.c.,'''':7-'11r ,,,,:ii1:_,1"'A *Z'e.itI.':;;t.,... ,- iii7,71,-.71#4 4rA4-"," WC:=;47 i-t-r-i- --;;.- 4 ---v, - CARIPOU lit4STEIN OR0%, 4- COFFEE BAGELS IP .41 ,, ,,, „. „i „.,,,, , ,... , .... . _ , ...... , . • ,. . . , • , ,.. , ..„ ......_ ,.. December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess 01 50%of the total floor area;or e, A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line, We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles, With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, gSignature: Name: 1-ar,s4- • dz, 6/ Please Print Address 7 Vc-7).-- Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 r✓r ��� f � 5�� 4 r a •"---• -�-" tb '� f es-,y �' , y ,. DRIVET r r, i " ems «. 111 0 . Velleend, t. 1,5 ii 114, She At 1 , liqi ,,,, .... ...,1.1; r (rt eeba 1 �i ' tra ' illiiiiii iii ', (: . ' j _ - 2* '''' i i *— - - ... 4: I, 11111i -, 1; ,14-?Iii ' i '1 1 ",1 , ail l i it,„! !; 44 '1: _;.* .....,, .., ...:. � ;,.„,.....,/,,,,,„,,,,,,„, _ .._. "_- �-Y-". ... tea. ,.��„�' 41110., 11 v' ,.,.__ .. ,--- Was this review . .? -'1.-• 141 lat )3 (4t, Useful 4 0 Funny e co., DOD 2016 gut 7 check-ins 4) FIrst to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! ' s sat in t e *rive up lane as there was no where to park to 40o inside I watched \Lcar after car s rugg e to 'et backed out of their s (21.....t. Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my biggest pet peeve igishT rirwere ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. .,, . . Nr , ..,,. , . Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? I II %.4"417 m 74 L - •'« E 1.4 , 1/3 I L-- -.A. ,... 000 n 0 9/3/2016 m.,,. honey. 1 cherk-'n bagel blueberry West Des Mc)sandwiches. toasted . _n Creek breakfast I love the , new Jordan bagels arid waitino to This the hot, and a with butter andines the jobb - were is _ coffee . l.ne in - . There - s in I location for 32 custom were A y on a , . , ,n 00 ill zi carsoTrdheerrefoowdaiatitncia: lin dLivfeurpSahtlusrldsaa ye f ular coffee l'' 15 ,.. - ---,------- shop. ,-*..;,.., rk--#.1,p;),,F"A':'; `. ‘!„4,!\'- 4,°,,,;":7;•!'''''';'7:14-,V4e4C*7 ''"'"fr'''''''''- ,"*.:44. '' ..---- rAI41 °U BAGELS ‘,:,,,:t:,.!.:..1„,„Iroil?.. t,..„IN or , , . COFFEE it ... . 4 ii ,), DRIVE 1 r' I , •-°'-'''' . ./,' 111 , , - . .„. . • . • _ .„_. -7-- . ' December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 fredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR, CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties, These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess 01 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads, 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned enclosed min'and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. . • Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: Name71 4).4/4 e / lease Print Address —73.5r" Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 • dry , t w°y„ SRyi^,f,y l s :7: ,,,,',;.,,,,......-:S-• motia ,IL iiii I iii., ii ; .. 1%3$111 MI .....23*!?Ag.'--:,'''''-5';' t4r4V144.,' uiiI,: �;' c sr or t h tts, Iss, ,,, \ u. ti 1111 11 i I lialiA%., ;:i i,t_41ii 6 .t: il tit !!!!'llti• „ . .. • misM"' al 1 1 111 01 It=7rii .'": — — -14 le'f µ v,r ,. .,. . . . ,-,Was this review ...? EE. . 141 13 1 13 - 0 Useful 4 e Funny e) Cool 0.30 1/2/2016 at 7 check-ins First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ' ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! 'A s sat in t e ' rive up ir lane as il-iere--w—as no where to park to iso inside I watched car after car s rugg e to a1backedoutof thep Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my ‘51g-Tes1 pef peeve is the dtlnks were ma e sloppy__ No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... lll give it sometime before I stop back. „ * • Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? N.."LP',...,,1 1 NO-,01.+,11.41 Z... W i"----'../... 1-4 I 13 I-- C.... ,...... 00000 9:3. 2016 • 1 cleck-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches, There were 32 customers in line in the lobb waitin• to order . food at 9 Ob AM on a Saturda mo _ rnin• There were 15 cars waitins in drive u0. his is a ve 0o*ular coffee tN, shop. -"!''''*-4'',7 ,.. - . ''',1•7;;;LI',0, ,,.:.::+-,;:,:- ': ',';,-.77-,",--7,--r. 41,W1142:Zi i,:‘...,`,".:,:',.-:,--t.f.Z;11 -1:4'- ‘'' ' e s N r * "et''' i CARIBOU' 104 TE1 ,140'4 p..k-ar:o >; E E * ' ' 4- COF - ( F B AG E LSliv, , , g" DRIVE THR'.0 •("sr,. ., . . ,,,, A I WO* "1 11,;W:t ,iiiir, ..r , i • • .--- • t , -... 0 December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR, CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidtecolliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e, A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C. Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic tha ihis business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application; Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-stor.ge warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound, 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: ,...j(i3ek • - - Name: t---A 6 Li/\ Please Print Th Address 1 19 c‘ Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 r �� , 4 ,. gip »yy„ ` yew It; "k 4 11 RS k - tA y,,.,. . ,,„.„4,.,,,,, .,,,,„,,,„ ,,, .,.. III ,......., ..........„,.,,, .. , . . , . „,,, , ,,,,,,,,,...„,,,;,.. ....,. ,ter .'. . IINIx- gam: «. „ p g Aci/7 ado r 4- II I i ew , 1!I ; 5 ',', .,f i.:.,' ,:f 0 i- \,1 v t f I II „ 74'44. ,e°",�°� �' �°- -.,,.�. ®„�. �,. .m....I i; :a ,44 m 3 . , ,_ .7,,,,--, tr. .... - - .4 s' a i 1 -, 1 � zG.s rte- . --,Was this review . . -N1.- 14"1131- 0 `1. tHt0 Useful 4 e Funny Cool ODD 1/2/2016 check-ins First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e *rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched carafter car s rc g e to et backed out of their Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my 5rgges pet peeve is e inn s were mase sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... l"ll give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ..,? 'Z.. ,.. v,a reur .,. r urrsr w.rcaaar s: r e [-------/, 14 1 G (s___ 00000 9/3/2016 eI check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the Lobb waitin• to order food at 9.05-714,1% ona Saturda morni • There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a ve •o•ular coffee shop _ 5 �9 yv a-y ..5 .,.„§ 3,.�:fid' � 0 CAPITOL: PINS:TIAN ISRO; ..,* '''' ‘"- COFFEE BAGELS ,‘P' 4 : Lw _...,,...„ ......., DRIVE ' s 1111, i E ,-"1 f December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUQ. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or a A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on thesouth east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this_business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. ' 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstoe Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: Name: ,c1/, /7- /t/k / Please Print Address73 -)• C Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 Milli i G., 4 n i.,(„.;,-;A,9'''''''N , . ' ''''': - �' 1— ' - ‘itifiV''',.Oilintt.'..t.-ie;•:- \ :~ 4 .am it '°IR sf Et B \ ti ..do Npba n , Ir` ingeteme „ S 1 !,..,„„ ' . is it P."' 'al I 11 ri... „...,. „ . .. ,_ 0; -. I! 4 n ILK i . this review ...? ' . L'" 13 1- C) ..� Useful 4 e Funny e Cool DOD 1/2/2016 az 7 check--iris 0 First to l e ieNA/ I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking of/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e • rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car strugg e tog et lacked out of theist . Seconfor a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my Digges pe peeve is e *ran s were ma•e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. • 4."14-4; Drive thru located in ILEI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ... -,„,I ,,,,,, , in ' "•"-• E/ 11 i 13 I L.-- . - , b0000 9/3, /2016 _ and honey. heck-m with butterrm6nes 1 c toastedbrdan Creekbreakfast sandwiches. to I love the blueberry bagel West Des i hot, new j,4 bagels and breakfast the lobb wThere were This is the coffee an in line i" mornings- coffee s location for ,a2 customersa saturdaY_ ic, ular — i he were %-'... A V on his is a ve There refod at - . drive u - ---------a--P---P-----7 order wnitine In ,,,-- ... ..„. 15 cars waitin. , ,- - - ,:. shop- , ,,,,,,,,,,-,,,,,,, ,-0,:,?..,47. ,ts,....,-- ,,..otf-7.-..?,,--,,..,, ,,,,,,,,.:-,.:,,Fi,' • _ os. ‘ ,, titisTEIN a Ri eh .. , ..;•„,,F921.,v,',42, - /MU F E E BAG Et"' IF F .1 riRu 47, co DRIVE ir:sg: - v..... , ..,.... ,..... , r - 17-. V .....---- • , , , • ,„- -: 0, -" December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 redReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliera.v.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana_ Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD, Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a 'drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property Respectfully, 10, . Signature: . A 11 Name: j_)e k 1)C- 0 rbeC Please Print Address ( 3LC Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 pkijH':%;2%.41:..... :: 41744.14 a 1 f .01011111111111111VVCiiiirm-rmafil-st,4,..- y �. r__ �is w.Y j j ik` -w f !�',,� X50 j +e ` ..� oG,, z 3 154.9l:11liN1k-!11•0"ri.!l. ,:l.'.k'-,:i,_:,--:..,::••;•,::"•::•-•;4i:is':-:::•.:44• x p: RI'�I .uo ,,....,....„,.,... ..........„„,..,„:„:„:„„,„......,:,,.,,,,• ----, ' ..,.....„.,,,- ,.., ,...01,igiotioit,t.„.1..1.,,pe, l y r A, eiftikw,* ,z 1 1::E...*:.,1,:.:.;,,,,',..!,,.,:.!:. ..1, ,,'iirlir,,:iiiiiiiiiii 1!: li -- - 1",- --, ,. , s - < 1 ,:::::::::;-.-":.71- 1' --- '''''-'-----"'"u-* . .**, ., .. i ,,:_ - .....„,,, .,- 114,„ ni vite*11111141111.1a 141 II p Ill , • . I lc 4. ..,.,.. i!r $j#' PM affi il "tr...:..." F :$1,- It R iji. .ii K.L:i : :11 te 4. . :.1,:." ., A'',..,',.,..::i-,iii '1!-:1-'- :,C.:;t:ik.i.: -1: !, -L.: 7--- ..„: - . : .. : : ...,,,,, "1!!/1 t...1 1 �• o- .R .:...>. n 1@ -' .� ,,Was this review 141 13 '1 B 0 Useful 4 e Funny e Cool ODD 1/2/2016 az 7 check ns et First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ilot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! * s I sat in the drive up fr lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after cars e to get backed9tpo . Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my '51-ggai pet peeve W7196Uririkiwere ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... lll give it sometime before I stop back. '01106L'' Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? Ei. j- i 6 I" _. 0131:11130 9/3/2016 0 1 check-ire I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the Lobb waitin• to : ... ...... order food at •:* A V on a Saturda mornin�gj There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a ve •o•ular coffee g shop .. ` � , may. r= ,ii,,,, A COFFEE BAGELS ‘',„.0 4 y,. __ , . „ 1 vtv- . 1:-. . - 1 WI% . '—'17T T; « fi 1 t . s December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach RoadfCollier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out,gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as"Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) Th- f.J . n. f iF i .ni •r• •.1, • • -I 1. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant. fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit 13: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq, ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: tf Name: Please Print p"-•• Address 7.5 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 • k - 41gkddx Yt '''''' - ' ' '' C 44. 53.1f Ss' '''' ' '' ' . -.....::::' ' ' ' ' -...::'''''''... :.:::::' v.'''.:.:' '''' '-'''. '''' ' '' - r- - 1". - c'''''- ' ...:..,::::.„..,„....n.. .... . , . ., , , „.„ , ,,,.,.,„,,,.: .-..,,,,.„..„4„.-,.- ,-.,,,..-,,,,, or,,vE THRu . .„ . -- .. G ,,,,,,,-„:„.,,,,,,,:„...„ ,,, „,,...,..„.„....„.„..,,,,,,,,..,,,,,,, ... .. ,,..,,,,,,,,. . „.„,„ . o ...,, ...k. „ . .. . ...,„,„:„....... .„. . . . ..... .. . .. .i,. ...........,,_A.L,............... . . .„.. ... i. .., . ...-0.---_,..,,,,..„- . .4„ .w.,,,,,--.„--., ..,,,..-,,.,,, .. ,.. ..„: , ,... \ ... :., , .,,,,,,...„,„,,'.24.....?...?k,- ',, ,r,,P-i''.•'''' ' ' . ..„,.....,,s, ...00000000iiiir ., ., .,,. , ..... .... „, , n :::::;_14:: 'c'„";,,,ii'§Ailiii:::£8,.,. Pi; 1..1......::. :2. ''. . ' 1 it i . , ',7i.',,,,-2.,t„'r!:.°:..,"':,,'''.1:ik.',.‘ -,A1,4),'"ftfigt.% ifi . '''''''' ' ' - ""Iml"El nirjm-RI” ri r. ono !p #-..meq NI 11 Ili I 1 ' * . .1 r.!lillill1111111 ill I ., / /1.., .„ ..„ -, ,,g, .1 ., I II l': , At .,. „......„ I N 1 111:7 r,,, •„;;',0 . ;It'l: 1 .4. , *,-... If , .. . .. • ...:, •,,, :,, . 1 If I ,.., *:1:: : I''',:: Ai � i - .. . „„„,.. ___ 1.' A - :1 ,i ow' ; ; ...e. ,,. A - .tea , .m �. � p o. 3,- ,:-., ,,,,,, ,,;,,,,i;„ w. 3 , .„,..,„,,,,. „t,' ..-......, „' ''''..,.. :,,,.,:,,,: r.;;; 1..::0.m-ram:: ;!.7.;.''' '''''—',7.:....-'..:. ::''''.''.7.., :7"t";........":"":"."-Hm.* - ,m,;.:-. :—,...-- -,:"'M' '-e.:-:. 7-..„ :***......... !!"' '''... '''''''''' ::: ' --- - ' ''''. � �y{, -'' - ... <.�...;.,,' se Was this review . .? --f,.. 14-i r3 -r B Useful 4 e) Funny e Cool 000 1/2/2016 f check-ins - First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review ibased on. The parking ,,,Aotidrive up lane set up is horrible!! As I sat in the drive up 'ar lane as there was no where to park to Ito inside I watched \ car af-1;7'6--a-r-" trugg e to set backed out of their s•ot. Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hied my ,.., Fgrpet peeve is thedrinkswere ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. •i• .- ,., ..,.„,";=,...— (9•17'''' - ...„,. Drive thru located in RE! Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review —? . Eis E ( j4J13 00000 9/3/201 6 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. s� . There were 32 customers in line in the Jobb waitin• to ` order food at •:$ A V on a Saturda mornin There were 115 cars waiting in drive up. his is a very popular coffee shop ,, r.m x w . CARIBOU 4 I ,, ,. COFFEE BAGELS ,..... � DRIVE syri ' 11 is g I 410* € • w December 16, 2016 e•-•• TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergovnet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use, Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Munl Code 1.08.02 Restaurant. fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics. a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A; Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the soutti east corner, This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review .y customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project, Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and thesotential for traffic hinderance not_only in parking lot but adjacent road5,. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an Bir conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature. — 7 Name: Please Print Address /$.5-Ci Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 Avg illimmui isper `,.. j/ - , {{ 1 / TT _ ..ice^ ,.� oT . . ----:::.",,...--.,.,-,---4--,:ii- -,:,!,::,.--:::!:',1--IMPN:0104:th: ' •••••'V',Z,',:q•::'-t,V,P5,:Nin.'-,kk"4,-,..,iEii-,ERk\-: .''''''',:&A''::::::::!'2„„„„:„''''''--„-' •••- - k,4,,, ....----------,---------.----,-,--.....-... .140•: .,...,c,a,•-•',,,''Ifl.,4.,.?:.y,.,ti,iottlltt,att;iptg: „34.,‘,.....i3i',..p.Hia',i :,..,,,,11,,,:,p.,.....;:,•,i..4-..,...,:,.:,,:.,,.1.:,,%:.i:i.,,),:,--,!,:itEk:.••••: ,i,..--\iii4,. r stk :°,': pp" t 8 ! ir.,„,- ass:: - `:„„.., P & .,r,.,. „,,,„„„..,,,,.„,„..,,,,„„,,,„: ..,,,,„,,„:„:„.„,:,,,,,:„ : ,..„: - :,. . ,,,,.. ..•, ,......... .................................. ..,,'•Pt•' 1 g 1 I tL k" ,,. :: . III!,..,. ., „, - ---, - i (Et, .,.., iii! !IF i Am ..... .;:-.; !.',.;iii iis '-:'4... ''.1:4-:' '''!"!:71-I::::i.-1 0!ti-E. :.., j '''''' " al .i''.' i ... .' 1 • - : I M „.--: i 0 giE4 ra if k , -„,.- , L. " - l''''''''..---:*"--1,5:::..---11il''.:- ak -00 •.. ,.� .,..w�"^ M., .+mom"' « _ .. .,.. „�- «.a^ o. • this review ...? 1-4-1 r31- B cp Useful 4 e Funny 18 Cool ODD 1/2/2016 7 cherk-ins 4) First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ,lot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! £ 5 sat in t e * nye up — — lane as there was no where to park to so inside I watched -1 car after c (struggTh to get backed \..._ econd for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my )Iggest' et peevè igIFEBTITRFwere ma e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. . I 4 ,• Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review —? _ %.....,....7,,,_,,,„ a,,..... .. urcvx avuuc , E141131— i ,_ 9/3/2016 '� 000DO • 1 check-1n I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. Theme re 32 customers in line in the lobbwaitin• to ° order food a :05 i on a Saturda morningzThere were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a very popular coffee shop ._ H I3= h 1„ •• 'A-. t -Qt 9h x DRIVE. -t' COFFEE ,.6.''' BAGELS VV,,,,A,,, i ....._ , i. a r` ' ' mow. „_,, December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergpv.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The fol owing facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amoun.t of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads, 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-stor-ge warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature /D.....,) : C?"714 ."2"— Name: c YU zani) 6,- Al'elfol Please Print Address 71-74---s) Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 --, 1 • 4 x 5 Z ir fly _ ^' -,:, ,. _ ,;, 4 , .001011°11111111tglir , _ , - 01", — gg �t ri I; !_m---... 1 f ,,/, iltbill I,— ;4 „I ik il 1 i -s' , !, p.,, , ,, i......1 ,,,: ...... ..,4 , , w , Was this review _.? --.1',- I-1-1 r31- B ... _ c) Useful 4 09 Funny (S Cool ODD 1/2/2016 Ilik 7 check-ins 11# First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking fAot/driveup_lane set up is horrible!! AS sat in t e * rive up "- lane as there was no where to park to oo inside I watched .., car after cailc7.2 et backed ou of their s ott Second for a drive up it was extremely slow.piral my 40. gges"----"T"TDe pe7'-'—eNTeTg the drinks were argae sloppy". No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. , - 4 . lr . , ,.. .. .-IN _ t Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? 7 I...?,,,,,..4 =.- -w. v ,.....si'll ° '''''''' ' -t E i - J 1...3(1 C..... T- \/... , CI 0 0 0 0 9/3/2 C)1 6 - , * 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the Iobb waitin• to order food at * : . A V on a Saturda niornin• There were 15 cars waiting in drive u•. his is a ve sosular coffee shop. --------7----„- 1,‘ ,_ , °,okIWP-0 k ..-.. ,--::::,141.,ft 044,:.•44,1...,,,,,,,r.je ,','',n t ,,.„-, -.ftabsse Zisi—i.-4-,,' " ---," ,;„,,; ,,:,....v1,,,,:f.:404,7744;t:Nr. I < ' t.. . CARISOU CINSTEIN OOS. 4. , 4 Ye . COFFEE BAGELS '‘,..„. Ai DRIVE Ti-IRLJ ..., . , wl .. , 4 'I ' ' ,,,-- , - 1 ttt. * ,,,,,,,- t 0., . . ...„, • December 16, 2016 TO: COWER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischiecolliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschrnidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site, Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for This property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. . . . Exhibit B Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended applicationa Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. r•-•%\ Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: • Name: - ex.) 1`11 Please Print Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 2 �x C ;. SEllitIour f � t� f THR p x b ,, 600001111/1111re . . ,,.:. ... ... ... , .„n..e,. .4tijaallIllellkllhl, s i n ' * Ilti': ;� * :*;.........'s ..Y a 6 WIIIPORMillp " x o r. sig r ��..��� y � .. -: iii_ 1 a" • „Ilia. airosainim II al I g ii. f':ii. I ,z-.., '''''',...,,- ' . 1 ..1, i: oi iiiti:;.,...,,,ii. 14 .a.*"* ; ., - • . .4 i I I ,,::...;.,:... qp.,, ! ti. , tea••"� - ,� �. � _`�' ..,,.. .�. iol � asleaNi - .+. ' «"1' •••'! " ,.... ..„., , s ,.1:::,.',... • �` `a" .ate .7-1-• . �« 1.--- .-- - •. a�.. :,,.; .'."".7`..''''''',-"' :;/, _..,-•-^�. "..,.�° � � .,.-�'✓'�� �� n.. ",,,,"�' � r 1. 0,0 Was this review ...? 141 131- Useful 4 e Funny Cool COO 1/2/2016 7 check-iris Fiat to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking at/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e • rive up ` lane a s there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car strugc e to et backed out of theirs cit. Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my 5i66es . pet peeve is e firm s were maiiie sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... l'ii give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? 7, ,.0‘,1 i't r-- yr I utral.y NO*wor t,'i ' L-1\ 1-( 113 ---1 (...._,' 00000 9/3/2016 ,---. • 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobb waitino to iorder''7'"-------food--9at :0 LY on a Saturday motLni, There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a very_p0pularc0e...? shop. 7 _ „...,.. ' '""4012 tw",• ' .,-, t•P'7.w,,44,' .1,' .‘,0'''';:,,,if4w/w>iii 1:51'Aittikill:QOM"..;:i.',7,.,:..,;' ,i„,„,,, 4i;$:..4.6....,A, 4-A, fte....dc fil CARIBOU ,„ ”7 ( 4-„,-... h* COFFEE BAGELS .... , DRIVE 1 HRL1 r ,. - , '''''''''',.•... ,...,:li P.:4 •,V 1472° , Vs , 0 • • ...„,„ e., , . . _...... December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergovnet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbysohmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as 'Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 I; Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBA main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: /101-- Name: Please Print Address 79-(-)62— Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 „ x r� �a a j .::, a 17 T { ,!e:',,,;,..',..,',,, • AINIP 04•i',4;00 •''''''''''''''':''-'' '' ' :•';••-'''' .' - :''''''''''\t/ ok,.. ,,,,,,, , ,, , • ' ‘,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:„.„,„ ,,,,,, ,: , ........,.....„,:,,:_...,:,:„0.1,4...,:iii .::.,,,tit ,-,-„z.:.4-...a,:i.::::;,-.:.„., :„..i.-:,,..,:,„,„..,,,,,,:t„„.. .„,.,..:.,,,„.,„.„.„..„,.,,,,,,,,,,, • - ' ' ... , ‘, . .., ..... , :. ,,, k. .osimmigillIllbllhi `� x !.a, ¢. �' � � ,.. . . . 1 I', . • • . .300! mosumeminionlvt„ , k,._44 . 1 .....,.....„. . , ,, , , .„ ...,...„. , , . .,::. . 1,: .• ,. . , , , 4...,.. .:z P 1 I. 6 ' '" ..,. ,. i lif ' V. I N01 i ii I i 0 0 i 1 A ,..ii 1'ii,,,...1;-,, ;:j.. --.4 - - ,..„ =. . g „ , :,�- ..� .w- -- ... 1 4i. Si 41 -,Was this review .,, —`' . t ' Useful 4 Funny Cool DOD 1/2/2016 IQ i check-ins0- First to Revisor I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! As I-sat in the drive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched .....:. :.:..:. caafter car s rugg e to get backed out of their s•ot. Second fora drive up it was extremely slow. hird my ai ges pet peeve is e *run s were ma•a sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? g.....‘,11 ...y .govg . £_,A.+4 19. f i N.0...' ,--.. 0 0 0 0 0 9/3/2016 1 check-1n honey. bagel West Des Moine the toasted blueberry hot, new with butter ands and ...11. to and bagels b wall' This is the were customers a morninct, There location for coffee - were 32 - - a saturcl- uiar coffee .// There . A If on . . e •oit I" -- d at .-I his is a v in line in the lob fi -, order foo indrive up. waiting_ 15 cars -------.-----'- „ ......... #VY shop. ,,,-0-:„„-, .-, ,\,- g. .4„.-:. ......._z ---412. -'---” , -04,-;„,.. ,,,..;_m.•-...... „,...„,menz', -',- - " ' ;,, .-',4- -,,o.„.- • ,T,w' .7.—sew ,'- „, --°-<k' ,-- '''''''' ''''' ''''':.f'"I' ''' .-,-, ,,,-,.. -.:,./..,';',•:•.-' : ''''''' ilt4sTE/N aRov. 11°Ii A CANS BG E I S . FFEE '-- CO 4 DR I Vp TR- ''-iiti li ....... 01 .0.., ,. . • . _ 0 •, . December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov,net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and proh"bited according to the MPO P. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit Li: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application; Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: c74)2 -Xi Name: it 4- k Ih S e-, Please Print Print .--..„ Address 73 Y. (,.., Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 --. • i i tA4�4 a a !!!!!!!;:„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_ .. . .....-16,,-,iii,:,:„,•„,,,,,,-,„,...... ...... , ..,..„..,„--,....„..,,,,,-•„„,„,„„,„„,. v ,...,ii,,,........„.„,„:„,„,,,,„,„„,,,, . ..::::„.. .. .., ---:-----:::-.":-..''.......:-::--::-:'.::'..:::ri'r'.:;:•::::-..-.7.:''''''''''-'':.-:.-'-'.:'.-::.:::." W ‘, - III, , \ v q ¢ < • } ay C #83 As I , 111 al t ".— 4 '"'-- -,' Xik 1:.,-5 I•V t.. ... - "-A -- 1, „i slim I. ; F � r - '-'--- '''''' ems; ..w"°° a„ , ` = «^" `,_ a '� -yam •^ 7.'.!-,«!,. ::::„,.. _ .:, ,.:7,,.,,..:::,7',-'-.-:;..:;: .,,.27- - :T"':'-'",,:;.:"";:---: ...»- a yrs .. .sem ^ -- this review ...? �-- *. 141 r3v' 0 Useful 4 e Funny e Cool 0 0 0 1/2/2016 7 check-ins First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking /ot/drive up lane set up is horriblell As I sat in the drive up ` lane a s there was no where to park to .o inside I watched car after car strugg to et backed cut of theirs at. Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my igges pe peeve is e inn s were ma.e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... l'Il give it sometime before I stop back. *;' Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? , 1.4.',..s.NJ'It •• .4,„0..“1,%...•I 16.4 1 L. • E. -- C... ,.., 00000 9/3/2016 • 1 chec\--in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter andhoney. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and. breakfast sandwiches. 'There were 32 customers in line in the lobb. waitin! to order . -7'1 food at 0 : I A lr on a Saturda mornin! There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a ve !o•ular coffee yi„, ,. -........___, ,,,,. .. .,. --- . ,,,,,......_ 1,\ shop. sTriN "Ras cAnteou FIN Iv 4 z, , ... COFFEE BAGELs ..... DRiVE. THRki 1: •.,-.,,,,,,,,:;:- ; , tc'''-',:71„li ' f'''''. ! ii0444, kiiittli " , ,- II N -S,:, /---- • . 0 ,,,,, December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergovmet , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidtcolliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a"drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application; Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditionedenclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq_ ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted wilt have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: 4"1- Name. Please Print Address -9023A Acorn Way, Naples, FL34119 • x y 6:0, �� i ,:,-.,„:-.:-..-,4,t-,,,, # �i �' ray �y 111, „AtidiNgilligilli11116** "*••..,„,,,, i ,;,,...,itall!,..„ .4,,,, z„, • ¢� 3�Y:,:.,17 ;::74. F^ £ ._ .e ,..,„1::::val....:. 1 .., .. ,. . . ...„ _ _ .....,,,,......... ;,., p,.,:-.,‘,,,.,:r„...,. i 45 B E iii 1 i it ii. II ,.., , :-... ' .... - . • . - - - - .,. c. I :,,,, . 0 , h 440411 1,5 , - ' i 1_..:, ,,..4 p1 k I 4 ,..kii !I.fils ...: . ,_ m, _ ma to a I ,..,_: „.„,,.., _!"... ., _ -.„,,,,,. ::,.--. - . 3 $ SI I, iii -A — ""' 71. 1,:.r. �—"t''. 5'6 Q S �• .war ' -..,...... ; - -- Wim` � . A. 7 was this review ...? • 1-41 Useful Funny Cool ODD 112/2016 check-ins First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking pt/drive up lane set up is horrible!! A s sat in t e . rive up 'n lane as there was no where to park to *a inside I watched car after car strugg e to .et backed out of their s•ot. Second for a drive up it was extremely slowjhird my iiggespet peeve is e .ren s were m sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I`ll give it sometime before I stop back.1:fr 63 Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ..? V:r I 164' 4- 7 9.f f i i i S./V L t i' NA.* nOODD j( , 1 r.-- L-- 9/3/201 0 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. •. There were 32 customers in line in the Lobb waitir�• to order food at ' on a Saturda morni . There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is ave •o•ular coffee shop.'',,\ w � , '*7-:::"‘''''''?:.'17.41t:t":::4;''''';4228Lf 11"g'::Irt:2;;;;i7 l''''''--- :47"' ''''1":'-';:t"';4:' 4'6'4"f''''''''' ,,,,„ 2, .4 OF 1 ARI EINSTEIN OS F ' 044 FEE S /0-• . : . DRIVE TiiRti ffi 4- r F . ' 0; 04 1 i i5 December 16, 2016 TO; COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek APUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according,to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess 01 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a"drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended applications Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned enclosed mini and self-stor.ge warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr), Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: r 3 0 bc,...g Cif vC Name: t/ (t. Please Print AddressAcorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 i,Z3 • „. „,,,,, ,. ,,... ' 11101 '' ' ''''V”'1'''';'` ,-,%"944."( D l 1.4 !! - N k , , , khk, 11,,, ,<_,., .. . . .,. •. _ ..„..,.........,. ,• „. .,..., ....., ,,,,. .. .,„ ,. ,...., ,/,..... .... . .. . . „..,.,,..„. , ,,,, _,,,,,,,.,,.. 2.,,,... .. . . y .. ..„, • IV i : .. # tilt Ifi a xis_ RH s ”. \ ig tC Hs „,,, . , a.Li,..... _...,,,......j.t.,,:,1_,,,,i.: ,..i. .y:, , t . 1 ,,,®, _ ,�,e ', 6 ... t 41' 0.Ri,.y Ea } ii '� aw..... E'er 7 �.r l''''L. a _,: III 1 p �,,.w max:""'""".. _ :r ...,Was this review ...? .---i., 1-4-1 13 -r Useful 4 0 Funny Cool i 2/ 016 0 0 / 2 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! "A s sat in t e ' rive up * „ lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car s rugg e to get backed out of their spot. Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my \,.._ bigges pet peeve is e *ran s were mase sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. . ,,,.. 4 lr ..., ....... .._..,..1, -,„.... .. ..--,, Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? NSW C.._ 1 4....49 If It 117 vh.A*.•1‘...' , „...----,A, 1-1113 1, t..,74 0 0 0 0 0 9/3/2016 el check-'n I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey.Creek West Des Moines e This is the hot, new Jordan location itin• to inline in the lobb wa for coffee and bagels. and. breakfast sandwiches. Saturda There were 32 customersa order food at s: . coffee a ve popular u0. his2§ a1. Y on . . mornin There were 15 cars waiting in drive , shop. _,,,1., ,4: ......7.,.41144 ,if'-‘?: ,, i4 ,' ' '''47:"L; Z':--:\7R7.1_,;.- -t;.,„.... ' ' ::.1, , ,. „.. ----A,,,,,,‘ /''',.-"'",w1"'"r'. /. -,,„, .„-, - •-77.----..:,,,--b-ez-;- -,,,,,,,,,, ':: - '''''' ''' " '''''''' ' , ' ,-',-4,,,,,,, -,:•,.,45-,-';, ,,,-• ,. CARIBOU 4.„,- k E ( COFFEBAGELS ‘ . -, DRIVE 1 HRki :71:7 ! Ti ...,-, ..... ...., • ! ' - • * December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net, 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess 0150% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This i,s dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C' Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an Bir conditioned. enclosed mini and self storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sqft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. t''-•, Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, 6rt ? CU i ft6e- Si (.1gnature: i .,,,---- Name: , 1 e -e...- E LA) laff Please Print ,--\ Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 atioit /y n ' '_a of ice ' ... E �� l� "-- - , , ,..„ - _ ....,,„N„),,,,.....,..„,...,.. ::,k.:::',,,,,•:: I" _..,..,,,,, \ ,,\\,, ,,,, Ktfl, A. f . .. CI "' .. sg e /Pill i . l I 11.01. . 1, 1 1 „ ....... ...,. . .... ... ,.. , ,,, , 1 i '"ill: 111,1. - - 77 -iLligillift Irt...., ,,,,, ,,,... ,....- .° ,--- -- - mss= _ .: , 1 r4f.;:::: iiii,i ilii, i 1.,!.. ;I .,,, ,...... ...,.. ,..,,,, ,... . - ' .• 'Z 1 i.4',:: i 01 ii '::.: ill, !I:2!kil 1,,::: 1 ', ••- .-- '.-- „„a' iiii i I 4 'I'6. ''slg I!14'P.* ' 1 -.1'. *-. ,..:;. Aga ; as as —Was this review B ® Useful 4 e Funny ( 3 Cool ODD 1/2/2016 .1Le 7 check-ins 4) First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking otidrive up lane set up is horrible!! s I sat in the drive up lane as there was no where to park to so inside I watched car after cars rugg e Second for a drive up it was extremely slow, hird my 31gges pet peeve is e rin s were maoe sloppy._ No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? _ 6AaJ'_ILiI Lm ;: p LII liIJ .. '1✓L)VI W 4 Esb14 l I 000009/3/2 1 0 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobes waiting to order food at • S A '' on a Saturda mornin• There were 15 cars waiting in drive up. his is a ver} popular coffee shop. ,¢ ��"n lam :. '.<.. -;�,wa «, .ns ., irae- -- COFFEE BAGELS v4 : 4 .„:„,,, , ........... u r -,:(-73? i t December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Fred eischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a"drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads, 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. ,---, Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, CSignature' ". alVid; IA)14/- Name: Please Print (-1 Address 753L-/ Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 .---- • gyy�/ r y, ',a x � ..,,,,,,„„:,,,,,,:,,,,,, ,,.,,,,,,,,,,„, . , lii ,5 '�'aaa 1... , ,,,,,„.k., 7 ', 4 .. s 4 .„. j/...00000iiiior . . . 3 % / y FMil '' ??!",9,:•",-.4'-',1-',.-. 4jig:/t,,,,,,i30 ti \ , i'''''''' ' *,i';;;;4:;,,,,Vt' t 2 ',,'%;;V 4 , , ,,,,, tillageolat rIOMP7 • R i ° ,i 6,,..,. � 'mss. El E ILIA .® , 1ill i 0,--•:-.', 4,'4 i I .% ''' 01. ' tgot!°- : '1 4 f,...1; I i , ,ii 0 i!!' IIII a If": _... q � � `w riff a .mow « ^ j....,:': "'e' wyR .. , d .; x. 'ww i„, ':. " » "«; °.:- -- _ !—!, 'r^e .-7.•!..7 7...:-.i.-1-. rte` _ wa., ..-,•.ate - .__.. a — Was this review ...? c) Useful 4 e Funny (. '3 Cool 0 0 ci 1/2/2016 -,:. .. 7 check-ins 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking .04;4ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! 'As sat in t e *rive up Iane i---il'iet'-'eWaS no where to park to go inside I watched Lrafter car"------s r--''f'T---. -me to •et backed out of theirp_L.... Second for a drive up it was extremely slowil. hird my \ ,13 igges pe peeve is e firm s were mase sloppy._ No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the CLIP/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car andonyour hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself asthey were to busy to care. They just opened so that couldbe part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. .0. 0 Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review . v.a+;..sxzt ,.Nw ata axwfir. = , _ '.+-s e a 1J2016 0 9 00 00 k-in I* 1 love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Greek West Des Moines location for L',,,‘,,,,offee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. x There were customers in line in the Rabb waitin+ to tforder food t �' on Saturda morn; •, There were --..--,15 cars waitnq in drive up, his is a vc •o alar cle - :.fim:::' ?:l'.-_,;:wer'''*--,v3-nwt-i,',.--7.:t..g:'4'F'z-' -/ - ' '''''' ' R OS- -:- At,,, '..7,. z ,,,,,,i,,,;,...,.,:i„:„..1„,,,,,,,,,„h...,..,,,,,„„,,,,;„,,- , , ., , _s T 6 1 Pi 1 s ',,i,.,„,,:11V z< El t 4 ",+' F { .� ae 4 December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek APUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. P"\ Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or a A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this prop-rty on the south east corner. This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B; Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Rev'ew of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr, Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature. Name:_ ; Please Print Address Acorn Way; Naples, FL 34119 i. p as z 4:,'"r-,,,,,, o ff' br� �� �am i ,s ' R fie... s ; ,',,. '' ho .,,, ..1, ''''''%:„... ' et- — ,,,,41.- , , ."...., SW i'',9,,,,i;gh:',V;;•1.,`, .J.:.;::;,',,i-3'?-,,,, i,i*,Y. . .,. , estemmerani,, : _ : NY } qE i • 1 t I ill 1 1 ''''' '4 :* ; 1 ° it 1'0 7 ,,,, ' I 'i i - - ',--'; 11111 1,f141 , Vill, 1,4 ' ''' if 1 i,t11 r Was this review ...? . 13 -1.- B ,.... 4. Useful 4 e Funny Cool * 0 0 1/2/2016 7 check-ins * First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking at/drive up lane set up is horrible!! AsT sat in the drive up w lane as... there was no where to park to so inside I watched \),..,5 car after car struggle to get backed out of their spat. Second fora drive up it was extremely slow. hird my igges pet peeve is e .rin s were mase sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. r Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? • El4Jt3rC DDDDD 9 9/3/2016 0 1 r -in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobo waiting to order food at * on Sat marnin•. There were cars waiter in drive up, his is a very popular ceffee k� shop. �-r, _ ���_,.�.� '. Nit* 3- r' a y of s' 4 I- of DRIV., , ..,,,,7, - .„,,,,n,v,-, 64* P Ix I 0. , . December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parkingjot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended applicationz Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq, ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application, The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature, Name: FRA h10E 5 /\1 0 SS c Please Print Address 7 5� Acorn Way, Naples, Fl 34119 0 iiV. y0 i6 3 i f F u {1 ::;:, .....,,,,....,7..:,.,::.::::!!:2:!:.::::;!!:::!li::-E::::::':.:.:44:'.4',?t''''''•''''''''''''''''''*;' 8. \''''...'''''''' ' -''' - '''' '' — ' ' e ', tea.. P T_.�-...:_.. � � , ax,r4„,::,:.„,„:„: ‘,....,..... .---4,4402 %.. y d .+t. , as t a. •% ... --,,,,;.z--,,..,:..,4,,,. e � � __,....1....4:::-:::::. . "tee,.. ,... t 1. I avx I. I am iii , „..,,::, ,.... , 1 V= I 0 ..: 1.4. _ .., ... * „I ... . s — -: ; ; kit 1 t0: 0 !.1 iu. i:. I i iiii 0.!. ;1.11 1.,. F::1.1.11. : '''''. ::'7.,.. : . L:a:r!!.. TY '',,i1 '''''il '''''' —4 in ma rili e,!:, .,..,1 ...tr..1 0717 x :',::' t','' ' ... ....6 , ............„L � a. w .+•� .. .. �' .. ....1 k 1 ,s .7_,.. :7-.,-.. .',7- �_ t . . 5 w .... -.,:: .«. :4:: lliur ,firi .*!'f:f.47.:-. .. .+a° te. ._. ,.., � A. - , � ., ¢. ., .�..., •tt --,Was this review --1 13 (:). Useful 4 e Funny e Cool DOD 1/2/2016 like 7 check-ins 4) First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking at/drive up lane set up is horrible!! s sat in t e • rive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car after car s rugg e to get bagLstg1 out of their sE91.. \ Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my ggesrpet peeve is e orin s were maile sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... rit give it sometime before I stop back. *Ayr, Drive thru located in RE! Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? ,..J I.,.1‘tat V L.. W 1 Ii-X I 11 17 N.4,-.....,‘..,I T 0 C Ei. i-i 1 isir ' 00000 9/3/2016 ,...... 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobb waitin• to ../ - 7 order food at *:$ A Y on a Saturda mornin• There were 15 cars waiting_ in drive up. his is a ye •(:)•ular coffee shop.------, '142.- -'1:,:i:‘it':,,,,,,-A ::'"°:.!,-.,,,rebev,.-.•?:,, :..-7.7**7, . Oa itiv,!°11.*A,,,,,,;14, 4;itisswa,„, ---..—,itz,,,,,.., ,;,,,,Ti.,11-ft; ..1w,. ,.,-,,t,-,,-. ..„-,,.' . .r.,,,,:i.7.- ,:-.-- --, ft4,-01,;-:!-,-/%144,t24,..0,, • ..iit,e;,.. -- ';',.;....t,,,4,00,,, ..., ics-,..c.,:fi. ' -. -:•-(7:;-, ---- '‘.-::,-,-, --- - ,7,,,,-,:-.----. . ,'-',--.,. --...-- ; .., fir CAStinOti IINSTEiN 1COFFEE BAGELS , _ Al A DRIVE ii-tic•0 ;., .,°,-,7; v% '1(4,./'e.,,,•,, Wr,' 4 7,,,,, ',,i-'",:,' ' P ., *1.4f4t -I r**, - xi. :,•,-, >, ' , . v - • 1I -1 , , , __.... ... , 0 ..-, December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@oolliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmicit@colliergov,net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club induding archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD, Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08,02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facili y not a"drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project, Ex ibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: e2.4Ai opr Name: I/ Please Print 7c 7 Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 el • 3f zW u r fix. L. a moi. , ': sed .,,�✓y. ,, i�,r; .. ''"' ' sem:. ` A. 'AZ alidig < . e "z -Was this review ... i 141 13 'V 4 Useful 4 Funny Cool DOD 1/2/2016 IQ 7 check-its 0 First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking at/drive up lane set up is horrible!! As I sat in the drive up lane as there was no where to park to so inside I watched car after car strugg to •et backed out of their econd for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my . igges pet peeve is e .rin s were matte sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'Il give it sometime before I stop back. ., . , *14%, Drive thru located in REl Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? .1746' • 4-**1", = 1„ef EY% / r CL, 00000 9/3/2016 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobb waitine to ?"1order food at **. . V on a Saturday iTiornincL _There were 15 cars waitino in drive ui. his is a vmL2g_pyIar coffee shop. e e an;;: ,604'04''•k44t lalAVFAN CAR/SOU rINETIIN BROC*, COFFEE BAGELS ‘111, ) Df:tIVE II 104.' • 1 .7070,40k04 *tw,, 0 -11Pik 1#0. VI 4720 , • **t\' December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe DE, Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergovmet , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties, These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag,jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as °Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub induding archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A: Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is dearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B; Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned, enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner(Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. rTh Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, 1 Signature Name: .. AI at Ari Please Print /---, Address AoeFft-Way, Naples, FL 34119 1/11 0 1 , ,--, 1116 ' fi * Yb e y 1+. 10011 !g , , „.„.„,....„:„..„..::.::::.:::...:...,:..„.„:„.:,.„::....,....:.;,„..;.,---:,,,,,,„,..,,,,47,,,441i*tz -7'7 ' ' \ \,..- ' ' * • , 1‘,,,&. ,,,,........0000air,.., .„.. a.s = s @ - ; 1. „.., 0. ! 1;N:1* ' ' !illi J......... 1 t.... — 71 1 ...- ...., - I IL t,,. .. ... ,t1,,,t,,...:4. ,...k,:„4.„,'.; .'^' ''' 1 a,"4_ 1 1 "Hir,„ al , t, ,,,„,,,, ........„„ .:::„:, ..:;: ; II 1 :::. " 7 g . .; --:-.-! : .4 '''':' '7/. :I IA °?: ti -1 tA 1 '''" s t..'''',_ .. r o 111 . . " oi:to 14,,,* . '. 1 .4 as- - :i iiip iii 1,7, -. .. ;„,.., 4,,, ,A,,, 1. 1 es 0. ge ,, - '" ''* , ,„... :=•••• 7„,;,, r:;:-. ,7"`* •' . ....,,,,,;,,,,,, .;.,,.,,..: ,.., I I iti ; - iff Jill . ' iili 1 1 :t ,tir; i r. :;...z:--,'4:. ,:-. t-.;,--, --.: z..,:-."•:„. :-'7:_o____7-':_,,,: '-.: :: ---',„:„.;:, 5,5 7;;;:!.7.;'-'-------- : - —...":„.*3 141r,Al.' x , ,,, ,..: . ,,,,,,, ,,,,, .........r. •.....0,,,,,,,,., w- z ,..•,,....,,,.9,:trrnr.1:::::',.,!.. itiplgemilititit.s..t. •• , - - '•-,:e.-- Y,'/,. - y.::— .,%- - ., of�,. ._ ,;. .:.. e. 1 -%1N- 141 13 -1 13 w ...? © cool ,..... Was this review e Funny 0 Useful 4 1/2/2°16 ins Ig•IF I got to The parking 4kc 7check_. Alt First to Review bagels only Caribou when the regular one across this disappointing. I did n°ta d on. I came is ew i base drive up 1 closed, whichwhat my review t in the II As .1 sat . watched that is . horrible- 1 coffees so set up is to go inside. ,,,, nt lane park . -- •a .„.., . . e up --------- where to out Of tneir .. ertidrIV _ - -- s no backed 0/1-- -- there was et lane as s i-ugg e to low- lopPY.- No after carit wasafae s car a drive up were m the cup/lid so c _, for a e iorin s off of etc your hird my Second .., peeve isexcesssyrup extremely s,ar and on \..., biggest p- .L. wipe :..... your ,..„ myself as they bothered to . us mess In . up one to clean it that could be end up wh . napkins opened so back. you just 1 stop i.tha aagoicirlo hands. Luckily t. e before to care. Theyi e im sometime were to busy ill give I the issue... part of .-. . .- .c at %-yStp,'WO i,. . . ... *1- - -..-------- . thru located inREI parking Drive and Fresh seatingMarket Pa Outdoor leW -*? this rev was Lj4j31 00000 9/3/2016 • 1 check-tn I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobb waitins to order food at *: S A If on a Saturda morni * There were 15 cars waiting in drive us. his is ave so sular coffee shop. - , CARIBOU tiNSTEIN PROS. COFFEE BAGELs t,„)141VE 11-.4kti • , • • • os* December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov.net, 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 - t, km: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parkina situation that will occur in aparking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature pi / (14 Name: 'w I t Please Print Address Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 0 segipmjnossoiloota:t r :777:-'''','''''k'':-,',.,:v..4),,,:;:,::,..,' �srr .'••'-,•;:i. F 44 s 0R1V E , . 'xi raimitin5 te ;ri k^.e s 1. • fp a � La - " . • • ...;,,,,,7111 a ----4., . : 4 ear -...' NM - .,, _ — lett 8' il — al -- --- : IP - ' it ' t'..: ' I ' ' 1 II Iii 1 III 1,* .., . ,,.., •.,,.,! .:.?::,:.:,: ,,,,:s 1,.. ..,, , „I, ,,,,, ...,... '. . ' ' — —' —; wt..—. „0,..-,.. ' fla :::::::,',:: ,.:' e ""� y «. '¢% t u ." .: ' ;'''''' :":7::, •,,,va„ °mom' ° ..w�' 's ». ... mer m 1 —Was this review ...? -' Useful 4 e Funny Cool 1/2/2016 7 check-ins ) F rst to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking ot/drive up lane set up is horrible!! As I sat in the drive up lane as there was no where to park to so inside I watched car after car s rugg e to gttpacked out of their spat. Second for. a drive up it was extremely slowjhird my Ji Test-0e s were m e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. *-1'•e * Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ,.,' I%AI 1— var 1 Ii.6 t itto lif -.,..c.,.r #I t...--- 1--- 14 1 13 T- L* ...-... 00000 9/3/2016 • -1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan Creek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. ,./ There were 32 customers in line in the lobb waitine to t Lsis a e / order food at 'I:. A V on a aturda ry_l_Lorningere 15 cars waiting in drive u11—__ ,m, ‘,._Lapopular coffee shop. )7 ( j__. P. - , .. 4--,, :;', ,..,., 1, 74'41'''',W; ---t;r:;;4,- -, • CARt8OU NINSTEIN , &I, 4''' COFFEE BAGELS t-,4„.* *-4,0* DRIVE 11-1Rti ----,' - t, I .1 V. 1 , (-. 0 • • I- ,,. . December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliergov,net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting dub including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.0E02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50% of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner, This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a. review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in a parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditionedenclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside storage of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehides. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: '/f # - Name:: ktar c r,-} A rra r Please Pri Address 1 r.� Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 e 0 is ripA k s " � � � � Sri rr des ate.,_. ":'..je. �,,,, y,,,�' ,.9 f. £'S'* ,,, t.fad., `; ''''t4 k� s " .. ' k,,swit , -, -:kilitillor.tAtirk':;:ii'k , ' , .„„•• ' - k -4: ',kaiik . \ ,.. y r. *e� 4s 1'' loglitioci ,-. „,.,ii.,,,.,,,,:,;,:ii?-2,!i-:" . ,..—.. '114ti-t-:-- '''''.1 ,I:. 1 .1...,.:71z...., I.:. "7_4,7 ,, :;:::"''''r'-'*':.':''''''' 1..°°.:..4' i ; ? ' ::::;0,:i;it,,1:, fFitt*-1,5,,,, * -- il ' .::.' go i •41 _ 1 _ - . t I .. ii is , rim 77 .,:,..,,' --.. ' I 1.--1 ... ..:.: ....: :-..!'.7.: ' ' FAT::: 4 1. ..` f-,-, " .--�`r y� .,� ,a„ ar.. �los � -°" .�. s a ,-,Was this review ...? [4-1 (31- B 0 Useful eFunny e) Cool ODD 1/2/2016 7 check-ins First to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking otidrive up lane set up is horrible!! 'A s sat in t e ' rive up lane as there was no where to park to oo inside I watched car after car s rugg e to get backed out of their snot. \,....,Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my Digges pet peeve is e orin s were maoe sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... lll give it sometime before I stop back. Drive thru located in REI Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? v a7'tie(W! L 7 axt!!( v VL?t d Ej .113 0 0 0 0 0 9/3/2016 • 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan geek West Des Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches, . Thewere 2 customers in line in the lobo waitin• to /, order food at • �► on a Saturda mornin• There were 15cars waitin• in drive u•. his is a ve •o•ular coffee Ai shop. ._ -.. s.y�..�, .fix ?.� ; sr : C • 6'r 4x 41 ' t C F F ,,,--,. — Vei.4.1%, A '. 1 X00,. December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReiscril@colliergov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562,25525600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic, proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental affect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD as original designed was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether if be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable, Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store (electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08.02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; C. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess 01 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. Exhibit A : Shows the business which is being considered for this property on the south east corner. This is clearly a fast foot drive thru facility not a "drive up cafe" as developer has stated. Exhibit B: Is a review by customer which is directly related to the parking situation that will occur in &parking lot/drive up lane which is what the developer proposes for this project. Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business will generate and the potential for traffic hinderance not only in parking lot but adjacent roads. /•-• 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned. enclosed mini and self-storage warehousing with no outside stor-ge of any kind. 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively effect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south east corner (Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq. ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MFUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. f---N, Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this OMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, - $ Signature: , I 1,-(--i Name: 3L-tz 0 4k cje T--Isr-vo1/4,4 Please Print ,--- Address )-7RD 7 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119 ___, • „„,.„. :;,,,. ... „:,.:, '-'0,:f-';'''''' ' H/N% g � ,��;�/cif X %; ��°'. �.. s.a 0440 . DRIVE i('F R l3 �a ':,,:,:ig,,,,-,*,,,,i:,,'i"'t'T,',,,,!:,: ', i g _ F . !z, • dr. , II it r ......400000por , . .t44411: : . .4... x ci ' .. i u** - - - - 01!°V., 'it I 1 iiiii 11':::;::. -.! .:. . .. _ _..... ...;;;:' :14 .11111_,.i iNth ttig i_ PIIIIII , , — ...". :, ..4 '......:, ! 14,:_. -:...14 m:1,:•'-'1, *.:._. i II I la I. mo , '.:,....• 114,L r^::::-;-1...:-E- -11111 ar``.p: ,..„,..:::::::.F2....7. � A X' w ..:.-:. v� om�,...k ,s x,... -w , ... ..., ,„......:i ' k ,Was this review ...? -k C) Useful 4 e Funny Cool 1 /2/2016 az 7 check-iris 0 Fire to Review I came across this Caribou when the regular one I got to closed, which is disappointing. I did not order bagels only coffees so that is what my review i based on. The parking at/drive up lane set up is horrible!! As I sat in the drive up lane as there was no where to park to go inside I watched car aftercar r strugg e to get backed out of their spot. Second for a drive up it was extremely slow. hird my ,aigges pe peeve is e arm s were ma•e sloppy... No one bothered to wipe excess syrup etc off of the cup/lid so you end up with a glorious mess in your car and on your hands. Luckily I had napkins to clean it up myself as they were to busy to care. They just opened so that could be part of the issue... I'll give it sometime before I stop back. ;I * ° Drive thru located in REI • Outdoor seating and Fresh Market parking Was this review ...? I-1 ! !.� araftwis DOCIUU 9/3/2 016 -� 1 check-in I love the toasted blueberry bagel with butter and honey. This is the hot, new Jordan geek west ©es Moines location for coffee and bagels and breakfast sandwiches. There were 32 customers in line in the lobo wa tin» to order food at « S . T on a 5aturda morningThere were 1 cars waitin. in drive u•. his is a ve •o•ular coffee shop. _.__.r,., �: :7-'"- ou TEIN aRe ,,, Ffr bio AG i A- FFE CAStIS &o. B ‘,. ,,, , .... .1„, 7 I ms x Y • `�:, ;, a.°'''tea .. December 16, 2016 TO: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MR. FRED REISCHI, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER Planning & Regulation, Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 FredReischl@colliemov.net , 239-252-4211 MR. CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 .D.Lb chmidf .•• I' , 239-252-2944 RE: Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Vanderbilt Beach Road/Collier Blvd Commercial Subdistrict Folio Numbers: 25525600520,25525600546,25525600562.25425600588, 25525600041,25525600067,25525600083, 25525600096 As a resident of Black Bear Ridge, a community located in the Wolf Creek RPUD, this letter is submitted to Collier County Zoning and Planning for the purpose of stating oppositions and concerns regarding the above referenced Growth Management Plan Amendment Application. The oppositions and concerns are directed toward change in density, the potential business types, specifically fast food drive thru, increased traffic and proper buffering between properties. These issues will have a detrimental effect on the quality of life and property values of Black Bear Ridge and surrounding communities. 1. DENSITY The developer has requested an increase to 200,000 sq. ft. gross leasable floor area for commercial land use. Opposition: Carolina Village MPUD from original design was for the purpose to complement the Mission Hills PUD by creating an upscale office park and retail center in a pedestrian friendly environment. The proposed density is roughly twice that of the adjacent Missions Hills CPUD which totals 200,000 sq. ft. per 33+ acres. VC proposes 200,000 per 15+ acres. Increased traffic to support the additional density is not in keeping with the original PUD intent 2. BUSINESS TYPES In order to complement the surrounding communities and in keeping with the creation of an upscale office park retail center the following business types are requested to be prohibited: Single price point discount dollar store for example but not limited to Dollar Tree, Dollar General, Family Dollar, etc. Establishment that includes outdoor entertainment by means of live or recorded music, sounds. On premises dry cleaning or laundry of any type. Whether it be coin operated or service provided. A drop off and pick up establishment is acceptable as long as dry cleaning or laundering is done off site. Facility for the purpose of sale, lease or rental of any type of motor vehicle or boat. Car Wash Convenience Store with or with/out gas pumps Tire stores, automobile repair shops or services selling gasoline or diesel fuel. Donation Drop-off Surplus store selling under/over stock merchandise or liquidation outlet Amusement center, carnival, virtual reality, laser tag, jump/trampoline facility, game arcade, children's recreational facility or play center of any kind, including but not limited to concepts such as "Boomerang's" "Fantastic", "Chuck E Cheese", "Jump Zone", and Peter Piper Pizza" , or other stores operating under similar business plans and operations. Massage parlor, excluding therapeutic massage which operates in a first class manner and may be part of Spa Salon or Hair Salon operation. Any Adult focused retail facility such as but not limited to Adult Bookstore, Video, Clothing/Apparatus. Mortuary or Funeral Home Cocktail Lounge, bar or tavern (excluding the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant) Entertainment facilities including Night Club, Cinema or Theater, Bowling Alley, Pool Hall, Skating rink. Animal breeding, storage or selling. Pet Supply and/or grooming retail is acceptable. Facilities for pawn shop, auction house, flea market, swap meet or junk yard. Hotel, lodging facilities intended for human use Religious community i.e. church, mosque, synagogue Facilities related to the occult sciences, such as palm readers astrologers,fortune tellers, tea leaf readers or prophets etc. Gun Range or shooting club including archery. Tobacco store, hookah lounge or vapor store(electronic cigarette), any facility that dispenses medical or otherwise legal marijuana. Government facility other than post office. Any drive thru fast food facility. (which is designated by Collier County) The following facility is specified and prohibited according to the MPUD. Fast Food Drive Thru - The current prohibited use of a Fast Food Drive Thru as defined by Collier County. An establishment considered Fast Food is defined by Collier County Muni Code 1.08,02 Restaurant, fast food: An establishment where food is prepared and served to the customers in a ready to consume state for consumption either within the restaurant building, outside the building but on the same premises, or off the premises and having any combination of two or more of the following characteristics: a. A limited menu, usually posted on sign rather than printed on individual sheets or booklets; b. Self-service rather than table service by restaurant employees; c. Disposable containers and utensils; d. A kitchen area in excess of 50%of the total floor area;or e. A cafeteria or delicatessen shall not be deemed a fast food restaurant for the purposes of this Land Development Code. X iii A : hsw th- • n: whi hi in i.-rfir thi !nor et eUth irner. Thi i 1:.r1 f. t env- thru f. iii nit . "iriv: • :" d- -le•-•-r h. stated. Exhibit E3L jisugyieaby customer which is directly related to the barkingsituatimplat will occur in a oarking lot/iriv- I.n- whi h i wh.t the •-v-l. -r iris. - fir thi irejea Exhibit C: Review of business shows the amount of potential traffic that this business ‘,A,....AlLgenerate and the potential for traffic hindrance not onl rlyput adjacent roads. 3. CHANGE OF LANGUAGE More detail description of storage facility as stated in the amended application: Self-storage facilities referred to in Application under Exhibit C Section 9 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT should be specified as an air conditioned -n le mini -n. :If- t.r. .- warehousing with notoAlesg_Qmgesfdwif 4. BUFFERING The Type A buffering which is presently required is not sufficient to reduce vehicle headlights from penetrating into the homes that are adjacent to the north property line. We request that a Type C Buffer be required along the north property line to mitigate the negative effects of noise, traffic headlights and sound. 5. TRAFFIC The proposed density increase will negatively affect all aspects of traffic as it relates to Pristine Drive, Buckstone Drive, Mission Hills Drive and Buckstone Run Drive. The traffic flow will be driven by the types of business an example is a drive thru facility with access on the south east corner of VC. Proposed drive thru on the south-east corner(Buckstone Dr). Such a facility will have a major impact on Buckstone Drive and Bucks Run Drive. This intersection has had numerous accidents in the past several years both minor and major. Traffic exiting the Mission Hills complex on Bucks Run Dr. will be entering Buckstone Drive directly opposite the entrance to VC complex where the drive thru facility is proposed. This will be unsafe for pedestrians and motor vehicles. With food facilities planned for the VC project there will be required deliveries made by full size (18 wheel) trucks. As these roads and turn lanes are limited in size and are presently unsafe this will only add to the problem. Residents of Black Bear Ridge presently access their main gate by left hand turn from east Vanderbilt Beach Rd. onto Buckstone Dr. With increase traffic entrance/exit onto VC Way and traffic entering/exiting from Buckstone Run will create a dangerous intersection and hinder access to BBR main gate. 6. CURRENT/FUTURE AMENDMENT CHANGE The current zoning is perfectly suited to the area. There is no reason other than financial or profit that the developer requests additional square footage. The purpose of this request is due to the construction of the storage facility utilizing 95,000 sq.ft. of the original 150,000 sq. ft. allotted to this MPUD. The developer fully aware of the restrictions of footage disregarded the original plans knowing he would request amendment for additional footage. There is a major concern that if he is granted his amendment what is to stop this developer or a future owner/developer to ask for additional footage to add to the unplanned portion of the development which includes the two parcels on the north-east side from the lake to Buckstone Dr. Development of the property is a positive for the area, but must be developed with a positive benefit to all neighboring communities not just the benefit of the developer. As a resident of Black Bear Ridge, I respectfully ask Collier County Zoning and Planning to consider the legitimate concerns and objections as articulated in this letter during their review and disposition of this GMPA application. The application as submitted will have a negative impact on the surrounding communities and adds no benefit to the lifestyle and property values and is not keeping with Collier County original vision for this property. Respectfully, Signature: J / /5 Name: a l� Please Print Address 7,54-N1 Acorn Way, Naples, FL 34119