The URL can be used to link to this page

Backup Documents 01/24/2017 Item # 9A 1 -24-2017 PUDZ-PL20160001255 COLLIER COUN HAMILTON PLACE RPUD REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To:Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: 9 A x Normal legal Advertisement Other: (Display Adv., Location,etc.) Originating Dept/Div: GMD/Zoning Person:Eric Johnson Principal Planner Date:December 29,2016 Petition No.(If none,give a brief description) PL20160001255 Petitioner:(Name&Address) GradyMinor-Sharon Umpenhour 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs,FL 34134 Name&Address of any person(s)to be notified by the Clerk's office: (if more space is needed,attach separate sheet) Hearing before X BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date Tuesday,January 24,2017. (Based on advertisement appearing 20 days before hearing. Newspaper(s)to be used: (Complete only if important): xxx Naples Daily News Account#068779 Other Legally Required Purchase Order No.4500172052 Proposed text:(include legal description&common locations&size Legal Section Non-Legal Section Companion petition(s),if any&proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? x Yes No. If yes.what account should be charged for advertising costs. 131-138326-649100-00000 Reviewed By. Date - Division Administrator or Designee List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA:Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note:if legal documents is involved,be sure that any necessary legal review,or request for same,is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: County Manager agenda file:to Requesting Division Original B. Other hearings:initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office,retaining a copy file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE � / - Date Received k I(1'I I i lL Date of Public Hearing I V 111 Date Advertised lit ) 1 Ann P. Jennejohn 9 A From: KulakPatricia <PatriciaKulak@colliergov.net> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 9:29 AM To: Minutes and Records Cc: Ann P.Jennejohn; Bellows, Ray; Bosi, Michael; Kendall, Marcia; PageErin; Neet,Virginia; Rodriguez, Wanda;JohnsonEric Subject: Advertisement Request PL20160001255 BCC Attachments: Ad Request.docx; Ordinance.pdf; Signed Ad Request.pdf Good Morning, Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Thank you, Patty Kulak Operations Coordinator—Zoning Division Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 PatriciaKulak@colliergov.net Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 9 A NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, January 24, 2017, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: The purpose of the hearing is to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/-ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DONNE FIALA CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/Patricia Morgan Deputy Clerk(SEAL) -9 A ORDINANCE NO. 17- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL220160001255] WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor&Associates, Inc. representing developer, WCI Communities, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY TIIE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a 9.75+/- acre project to be known as the Hamilton Place RPUD to allow up to 66 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units in accordance with the RPUD Documents, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "F" and incorporated herein by reference. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. [16-CPS-01571] 79 Hamilton Place RPUD PUDZ-PL20160001255 12/19/16 1 of2 9 -* SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,this__day of , 2017. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk ,Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Au ,A.Q‘ Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A —Permitted Uses Exhibit B —Development Standards Exhibit C—Master Plan Exhibit D—Legal Description Exhibit E—list of Deviations Exhibit F—Developer Commitments [16-CPS-01571} 79 Hamilton Place RPUD PUDZ-P120160001255 12/19/16 2 of 2 - - — - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9 : EXHIBIT A FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD Regulations for development of the Hamilton Place RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Document and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 66 residential dwelling units shall be permitted within the RPUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Dwelling Units — Multi-family, single family detached, single family attached and single family variable lot line. 2. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or the Hearing Examiner. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Customary accessory uses associated with the principal uses permitted in this RPUD, including but not limited to garages, carports, swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures and utility buildings. 2. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 4. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner. AMENITY AREA A. Principal Uses: Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 1 of 8 12/15/2016 9 A 1. Clubhouses with cafes, snack bars and similar uses intended to serve residents and guests. • 2. Community administrative and recreation facilities. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis/pickle ball courts and basketball courts, parks, playgrounds, pedestrian/bikeways, and passive and/or active water features (private intended for use by the residents and their guests only). 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, landscape nurseries, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters to serve residents and their guests. 4. Tennis clubs, health spas, fitness facilities and other indoor recreational uses (private, intended for use by the residents and their guests only). B. Accessory Uses: 1. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 2. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner. PRESERVE A. Allowable Uses: 1. Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve area to be retained. 2. Mitigation for environmental permitting. 3. Passive Recreation areas,as per LDC requirements. 4. Water management as allowed by the LDC. Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 2 of 8 12/15/2016 9A ' ' i _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ EXHIBIT B FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Hamilton Place RPUD Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of 1 the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. STANDARDS I SINGLE-FAMILY VARIABLE LOT SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY AMENITY DETACHED LINE FOR SINGLE ATTACHED CENTER FAMILY Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1 acre 10,000 SF Minimum Lot Width *3 50 feet 40 feet 35 feet 100 feet N/A Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet N/A Minimum Front Yard *1,*6 20 feet*2 20 feet*2 20 feet*2 20 feet N/A Minimum Side Yard 5 feet 0-10 feet*4 0 or 5 feet 10 feet N/A Minimum Rear Yard *6 Principal 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet N/A Maximum Height Zoned(not to exceed 2 stories) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Actual(not to exceed 2 stories) 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet Minimum Distance Between 12 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A Principal Structures *5 Floor Area Min. (S.F.) 1500 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF N/A PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet — Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ' f Front*2 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet ' Side 5 feet 0 feet 0 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard *6 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A 1 PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Structures _ Maximum Height Zoned(not to exceed 2 stories) 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Actual(not to exceed 2 stories) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type,and not the minimum lot area,shall define the development standards to be applied by the Growth Management Department during an application for a building permit. For variable lot single family and single family attached units, a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configurations, including building setbacks and building separations, shall be submitted to the Growth Management Division with the application for the first building permit for the platted development tract. Verification of ingress/egress for maintenance shall be provided for variable lot line single-family units. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. *1—Front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. B. If the parcel is served by a private road,setback is measured from the back of curb(if curbed)or edge of pavement(if not curbed). I Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 3 of 8 12/15/2016 9A C. If the parcel has frontage on two sides, setback is measured from the side with the shortest frontage with the other frontage designated as a side yard. *2—Front entry garages must be a minimum of 20',and a minimum of 23'from a sidewalk. Porches, entry features and roofed courtyards may be reduced to 15'. *3—Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20%for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. *4—The side setback may be variable between zero feet(0')to ten feet(10')as long as a 10-foot minimum separation between principal structures is maintained. If the variable lot line for single-family option is utilized,the owner shall provide with the building permit application,the setback of the principal structures on the abutting lots of all sides. *5—Building distance may be reduced at garages to a minimum of 0'where attached garages are provided and a 10' minimum building separation is maintained,if detached. *6—No front building setback is required from the 30' wide access easement,which extends along the southerly boundary of the Hamilton Place PUD. However,a landscape buffer shall be required. Note:nothing in this RPUD Document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 4 of 8 12/15/2016 -1g W N to r 1 CAI N(J1-i IVi o c O O 2 m z a>i z z LIVINGSTON ROAD 3>m< m>r-<fn zommo 00-I3z z z I F.,13 wr��xes a 0▪C ct ,I▪CO' OE - - - zxl 0OmD-i I N s ? m C c I R �' 4.- I; A--- z I (.0 v i- .. R'�a V c p Im I -._ -- m� , 1 (mn �n xggt I �� c my----I 1 Ix m P' -0m o � I m XI� I, � I 9ra�i �� z � I m O� Ij v -� o m I m r VIII m o 1 a �m I I 1� 3 I m cn =i I F.A' I ' X I N D O • A $ f�fi ___°°_,>< N 8 II W m I m o D I m ,, W X 4,rtg, 0 z I 1* -< -< c if 1 7III 1 i 0 p (£#310N 33S) I 1 Cl) cmi> ri Fn m lu I 7 m 1INS3 1 m p 13 1 I O D o a fi YipF OE 11 Z - o g z I& I —m ' sg © m I �*• m mm _ ;= 7 cP I lm I A< F °' m cnD I I Z ' mm -• y= mZ �T I ; 1 1 Zo I I �� y C 1 6 O a'rei -I vv N ▪ • F. x m m I .E.'., z c mm I 0m m D o III � � rI m m 0 7_' Nc I „' - m _� I ,217. m m I r': 4 : 44 co co I mm mo ; .�. m�. 'r -( (�� I r rrr fm , r r /2....6 r Cf ! 4 E J4 rr Z" D rrrrrrrrrrr�m • �r2 /, r) ri r, r, E IxOAm aomy'9D� 05 G CC mD7 mmm Vl > I vmCpAmmp -1mpmD EfE < E « f « k E ( xi g o pmrn1 1 < f f b o6P3 -> A « f l <Z 3iZm>�.. f �A �S3dE ' ff I� D m Or µ . D D z m > I 1 « < fEf C n x 73 Q Z m 1 E4 4 a D c=< -I 0, omZD co Of ---000Q q= rn° XX -4 'v,+EO Vµµg D �m p + Dw rDDi+ r e o� c D n D D n n D 3A2i3S3ad 3Sn m ,SpoA z S o oO c - s—z — 5 g�� s 0 and S3?IV1 NO1ONI1 IV:o3NOZ it Y° 4 , < a m $$ _ _ 9 EXHIBIT D FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504066) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 528.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504081) THE WEST 264 FEET AND THE EAST 264 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504087) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 792.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 1056.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 6 of 8 12/15/2016 9 A EXHIBIT E FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LIST OF DEVIATIONS No Deviations requested. Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 7 of 8 12/15/2016 IAEXHIBIT F 9 FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval,the Managing Entity is WCI Communities, LLC,24301 Walden Center Drive, Bonita Springs, FL 34135, Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2. MISCELLANEOUS a. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. b. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development 3. ENVIRONMENTAL a. The RPUD shall be required to preserve 15% of native vegetation, 6.46± acres of native vegetation exists on-site requiring a minimum preservation of 0.97± acres (6.46 x .15 = 0.97) of native vegetation to be retained. b. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic removal in accordance with LDC Section 4.06.02 and LDC Section 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07. 4. WATER MANAGEMENT The project's stormwater management system shall be designed to discharge to the east into the Whippoorwill Flowway. Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 8 of 8 12/15/2016 Ann P. Jennejohn 9A From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 10:26 AM To: 'KulakPatricia';JohnsonEric (EricJohnson@colliergov.net); Neet, Virginia Subject: RE: Advertisement Request PL20160001255 BCC Good Morning Patty, I'll get your ad processed and send the proof a.s.a.p. Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustvnent Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 23q-252-8406 Fax 23q-252-8408 From: KulakPatricia [mailto:PatriciaKulak@colliergov.net] Sent:Thursday, December 29, 2016 9:29 AM To: Minutes and Records<MinutesandRecords@collierclerk.com> Cc:Ann P.Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com>; Bellows, Ray<RayBellows@colliergov.net>; Bosi, Michael <MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; Kendall, Marcia <MarciaKendall@colliergov.net>; PageErin <ErinPage@colliergov.net>; Neet,Virginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; Rodriguez, Wanda <WandaRodriguez@colliergov.net>;JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Subject:Advertisement Request PL20160001255 BCC Good Morning, Please process the attached and acknowledge receipt at your earliest convenience. Thank you, Patty Kulak Operations Coordinator—Zoning Division Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 PatriciaKulak@colliergov.net Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. i AAnn P. Jennejohn 9 From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 4:23 PM To: legals@naplesnews.com Subject: PUDZ-PL20160001255 Attachments: PUDZ-PL20160001255.doc; PUDZ-PL20160001255.doc Please advertise the attached ort Wednesday, January 4, 2017. Thank you! Ann Jennejohvt, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier Couvtty Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 1 9 A Account #068779 Corporate Reference #505868 December 29, 2016 Attn: Legals Naples News Media Group 1100 Immokalee Rd. Naples, Florida 34110 Re: PUDZ-PL20160001255 Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Wednesday, January 4, 2017, and send an Affidavit of Publication, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500172052 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE 9 A Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, January 24, 2017, in the Board of County Commissioner's Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: The purpose of the hearing is to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 9 A DONNA FIALA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Ann Jennejohn Deputy Clerk(SEAL) County'of Collier CLERK OF THE CJRCLIT COURT 9 COLLIER COUNT\ OUR1H OUSE ,� 1H 3315 TAMIAMI TRL E STE 102 Dwight E.Brock-dterk of circuit Court P.O.BOX 413044 NAPLES,FL 34112-5324 NAPLES,FL 34101-3044 Clerk of Courts • Comptroller • Audito .! Cfiistodian of County Funds January 3, 2017 Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Tech Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Re: Petition PUDZ-PL20160001255, Hamilton Place RPUD Dear Petitioner, Please be advised the above referenced petition will be considered by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, January 24, 2017, as indicated on the enclosed notice. A legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Wednesday, January 4, 2017. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Phone- (239) 252-2646 Fax- (239) 252-2755 Website- www.CollierClerk.com Email- CollierClerk@collierclerk.com 9 A Ann P. Jennejohn From: ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 4:50 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn Cc: Ivonne Gori Subject: Ad: 1424132, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF I Attachments: BCCZONINGD-37-1424132-1.pdf Attached is the docuwtevtt you requested. Please review and let us kvtow if you have any questions. Thavtk you. Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist Naples Daily News/USA Today Network 0: 239.213.6061 F: 23q.263.4307 E:ivovtvte.gori@NaplesNews.covvi A: 11-00 Ivvtwtokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 1 A Jt > Ad Proof A14' I, 3 *Ill w Sales Rep:Ivonne Gori(N9103) Phone:(239)262-3161 Email:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com Date:12/29/16 This is a proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates indicated below. Account Number:505868(N068779) Please confirm placement prior to deadline by contacting your account rep at(239)262-3161. Company Name:BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT Ad Id:1424132 P.O.No.:45-172052 Total Cost:$446.61 Contact Name: Email:martha.vergara@collierclerk.com Tag Line:NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF I Address:3299 TAMIAIVI TRL E#700,NAPLES,FL,34112 Start Date:01/04/17 Stop Date:01/04/17 Phone:(239)774-8049 Fax:(239)774-6179 Number of Times:1 Class:16230-Other Public Notices Publications:ND-Naples Daily News,ND-Intemet-naplesnews.com I agree this ad is accurate and as ordered. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday,January 24,2017 in the Board of County Commissioner's Meeting Room,Third Floor, Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners(BCC)will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance.The meeting will commence at 910 A.M.The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: The purpose of the hearing is to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.2004- 41,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL(A)ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(RPUD)ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/ OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,CONSISTING OF 9.75+/-ACRES;AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PUDZ-PL20160001255] A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection.All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item.The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman,a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing.All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disabilitywho needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,youare entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112- 5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days priorto the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA DONNA FIALA,CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK By: Ann Jennejohn Deputy Clerk(SEAL) 1Thaanuary 4,2017 No.1424132 nk you for your business. Our commitment to a quality product includes the advertising in our publications. As such,Gannett reserves the right to cat- egorize,edit and refuse certain classified ads.Your satisfaction is important. If you notice errors in your ad,please notify the classified department immedi- ately so that we can make corrections before the second print date. The number to call is 239-263-4700. Allowance may not be made for errors reported past the second print date.The Naples Daily News may not issue refunds for classified advertising purchased in a package rate;ads purchased on the open rate may be pro-rated for the remaining full days for which the ad did not run. 9 A Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 4:55 PM To: Neet, Virginia; 'KulakPatricia';JohnsonEric (EricJohnson@colliergov.net) Subject: Hamilton Place Petition PUDZ-PL20160001255 (1-24-2017 BCC Meeting) Attachments: BCCZONINGD-37-1424132-1.pdf Hi there, The proof for (Hamilton Place) Petition PUDZ-PL2O16OOO1255, that will be published next Wednesday, January 4, 201-7 for the January 24, 2017 13CC Meeting, is attached for review and approval. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 23q-252-8408 Original Message From: ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Thursday, December 2q, 2016 4:50 PM To: Ann P. Jennejohn <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Cc: Ivonne Gori <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: Ad: 14241-32, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF I Attached is the document you requested. Please review and let us know if you have any questions. Thank you. Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist Naples Daily News/USA Today Network 0: 2.3q.2_13.6061- F: 3@.213.6061F: 23 9.263.4307 E:ivonne.gori@NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 1 9 Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P. Jennejohn Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:53 AM To: Neet, Virginia; JohnsonEric (EricJohnson@colliergov.net); 'KulakPatricia' Subject: FW: Hamilton Place Petition PUDZ-PL20160001255 (1-24-2017 BCC Meeting) Attachments: BCCZONINGD-37-1424132-1.pdf Good Morning, This ad is scheduled to run tomorrow, so I'll need to give NDN an "O.K." (or not) within the next couple of hours. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 Original Message From: Ann P. Jennejohn Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 4:55 PM To: Neet, Virginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; `KulakPatricia` <PatriciaKulak@colliergov.net>; JohnsonEric (EricJohnson@colliergov.net) <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Subject: Hamilton Place Petition PUDZ-PL20160001255 (1-24-2017 BCC Meeting) Hi there, The proof for (Hamilton Place) Petition PUDZ-PL20160001-255, that will be published next Wednesday, January 4, 201-7 for the January 24, 2017 BCC Meeting, is attached for review and approval. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 1 9 A Ann P. Jennejohn Subject: FW: Hamilton Place Petition PUDZ-PL20160001255 (1-24-2017 BCC Meeting) Original Message From: Neet, Virginia Sevtt: Tuesday, January 03, 201-7 9:23 AM To: Ann P. Jevtrtejokvt <Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com> Subject: FW: Hamilton Place Petition PUDZ-PL20160001255 (1---24-Z01-7 13CC Meeting) Origivtal Message From: AshtovtHeidi Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 201-7 9:17 AM To: NeetVirgivtia; CrotteauKatkynell Subject: RE: Hamilton Place Petitiovt PUDZ-PL-20160001255 (1-24-2017 13CC Meeting) App roved. Heidi Askton-Cicko Heidi Asktovt-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 3411-2 (239) 252-8400 Original Message From: NeetVirgivtia Sevtt: Tuesday, January 03, 201-7 8:54 AM To: AshtovtHeidi; CrotteauKathyvtell Subject: FW: Hamilton Place Petition PUDZ-PL20160001255 (1-24-2017 13CC Meeting) Heidi: For your approval!!! Original Message From: Ann P. Jennejokn [mailto:Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:53 AM 1 9 Pc To: NeetVirginia; JohnsonEric; KulakPatricia Subject: FW: Hamilton Place Petition PUDZ-PL201i'0001255 (1-24-2017 BCC Meeting) Good Morning, This ad is scheduled to run tomorrow, so 1'II need to give NDN avt "O.K." (or vtot) within the next couple of hours. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-8406 Fax 239-252-8408 Original Message From: Ann P. Jennejohn Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 4:55 PM To: Neet, Virginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; 'KulakPatricia' <PatriciaKulak@colliergov.net>; JohnsonEric (EricJohnson@colliergov.net) <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Subject: Hamilton Place Petition PUDZ-PL20160001255 (1-24-2017 BCC Meeting) Hi there, The proof for (Hamilton Place) Petition PUDZ-PL20160001255, that will be published next Wednesday, January 4, 2017 for the January 24, 2017 BCC Meeting, is attached for review and approval. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-84010 Fax 239-252-8408 Original Message From: ivonne.gori@naplesnews.cort [wtailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.covtn] Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 4:50 PM 2 9A Ann P. Jennejohn From: Johnson Eric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Sent: Tuesday,January 03, 2017 5:18 PM To: Ann P.Jennejohn; Neet, Virginia; KulakPatricia Subject: RE: Hamilton Place Petition PUDZ-PL20160001255 (1-24-2017 BCC Meeting) Looks good to me. Thanks! Respectfully, Eric L. Johnson, AICP, CFM, LEED Green Associate Principal Planner Original Message From: Ann P. Jennejohn [wtailto:Ann.Jennejohn@collierclerk.com] Sevtt: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:53 AM To: NeetVirginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net>; KulakPatricia <PatriciaKulak@colliergov.net> Subject: FW: Hamilton Place Petition PUDZ-PL201(o0001255 (1-24-2017 BCC Meeting) Good Morning, This ad is scheduled to run tomorrow, so I'll need to give NDN an "O.K." (or not) within the next couple of hours. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 239-252-84060 Fax 239-252-8408 Original Message From: Ann P. Jennejohn Sent: Thursday, December 2q, 2016 4:55 PM To: Neet, Virginia <VirginiaNeet@colliergov.net>; 'KulakPatricia' <PatriciaKulak@colliergov.net>; JohnsonEric (EricJohnson@colliergov.net) <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Subject: Hamilton Place Petition PUDZ-PL20160001255 (1-24-2017 BCC Meeting) c! A Ann P. Jennejohn From: Ann P.Jennejohn Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 9:45 AM To: 'ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com' Cc: Naples Daily News Legals Subject: RE: 1424132, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF I Looks great Ivovtvte, please publish tomorrow, Javtuary 4, 2017. Thank you! Ann Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk Clerk of the Circuit Court Clerk to the Value Adjustment Board Collier County Board Minutes & Records Dept. 23q-252-8406 Fax 23q-252-8408 Original Message From: ivovtvte.gori@vtaplesvtews.cowt [wailto:ivovtyte.gori@vtaplesvtews.cowt] Sevtt: Thursday, December 2q, 2016 4:50 PM To: Avtvt P. Jennejohn <Avtvt.Jevtvtejohvt@collierclerk.cowt> Cc: Ivorwte Gori <ivortvte.gori@rtaplesrtews.cowt> Subject: Ad: 1-424132, NOTICE OF PUI3LIC HEARING NOTICE OF I Attached is the document you requested. Please review and let us kvtow if you have any questions. Thank you. Ivovtvte Gori Legal Advertising Specialist Naples Daily News/USA Today Network 0: 239.213.(00(01 F: 239.263.4307 E:ivovtvte.gori@NaplesNews.cot A: 1100 Iwtwokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 1 9A 4 apLri Battu NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT 1424132 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA 45-172052 Pub Dates January 4,2017 (Sign ure of affiant) ilhadIrdhai Sworn to and subscribed before me I +""�►g., IVONNE GORI �` Notary Public State of Florida This January 0 ,2017 • .� Commission s FF 900870 �-. es My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 � • I 444TiAr Bonded through National Notary Assn. ,moi}, (Signatur of affiant) ' 240 Wednesday,January 4,2017 Naples Daily News 9 A Sp,le R,,,„,s m/''� Uport Utility Vehicles Ve hlcles Wanted Legal Notices Legal Notices Up To 3 Months FREE RENTI Transportation`..l�f SUBARU FORESTER 2015. CASH FOR CARS LEGAL NOTICE j Al FRENCH QUARTER -- R17116A,2.5i.Premium We Buy Any Condition Executive Suites and Triple $23,991 DVoe Buick GMC Vehicle 2000 and THE NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROLAND RESCUE DISTRICT BOARD Net Commercial Space. CI,-Issir C:Irs (855)362-9702 Newer Nation's Top Car Buyer OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS WILL HOLD ITS REGULAR MONTHLY Various Sizes.Beth Snoke " FREE Towing From Anywhere! MEETING ON THURSDAY,JANUARY 12,2017 COMMENCING AT 239-261-2888 1977 GRAND PRIX PONTIAC Trucks Call NOW 088.657-4599 9:00 A.M.IN THE TRAINING ROOM AT THE NORTH COLLIER FIRE Yellow w/white landau top CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT'S STATION 45 LOCATED AT 1885 CORVETTES WANTED - TOP VETERANS PARK DRIVE,NAPLES,FL 34109. Stera9c Units and interior-V8.AT.PB,PW, CHEVROLET 671,SILVERADOCab. dollar.Cash today. Call 941- AC.very good condition,one 2014.316671,Crew Cab, 809-3660 or 941-923-3421 The agenda will be available the Monday prior to the meeting at A/C LOCKERS, 3'04'up to owner,odometer 91,440,FL Only 23,500 miles$32,991 ,N warehouse size,lowest S's in car§5,600.(941)807.7440. Devoe Buick GMC GLOBAL MOTORSPORTS w.northcollietire.com;or by calling 239-597-3222 to request Naples!(239)643-0447 PONTIAC TRANS AM FORMULA (8551362.9702 Car-Truck-Cycle-Powers ort V faxed or ork Dr. copy;of by visiting Station 45 located at 1885 11l1995.Rare ne,.upgrmas- Dan or Eric(239)580-6110MVeterans Park Dr.Naples,FL 34109. OFFICEC.Rentalsvol.show. a winner,upgrades. LARGEST,BUYER cyc es-Autos, TheisNorth Collier Fire Control andiuRescue yidoes not OR WAREHOUSE o $5900.Naples(720)314-9200. trucks,RV's,cycles.200 to reasonable on the basis of disability. Anyone requiring UPSCALE Naples complex, PONTIAC 937,ery good cond. CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 $1001.Dave.(239)250-2000 reasonable accommodation ascoctLedyfor in the Americans 16-3.5K sf.(239)254-1971 8 cyl.4 dr.,all manuals,must 2012.TE17137A,4WD,Ext with Disabilities Act should contact Lori Freiburg at(239)597- see!$18,750.(239)263-3134. Cab,only 26K miles$27,991. STEARNS MOTORS 3222 or via email to If reiburgemorthcollierfire.com. RENT IT FAST!!! Devoe Buick GMC pp MOST TRUSTED Naples Daily News -' (855)362-9702 I BUYER Since 1977. Chairman Norman Feder offers special packages .v. t All Vehicles wanted North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District to help you Rent your - +, CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 Rod or Jim(239)774-7360 Januar 4,2017 No.1411105 property now! 2013.TE16473B,4WD Crew Cab 528.491 m Not,,, Best Rental Package PORSCHE 911 or 912,wanted DeVce Buick GMC •Naples Daily News by private local collector. (855)362.9702 S REGULAR MEETINGS i.n plesnews.com 239-206-3110 CHEVROLET SILVERADO BRIDGESTONE I TIRES DUELER r Marco Eagle 1500 2014.QM6678,Crew 285045022(6 total tires) THE NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT *The Banner Cab,only 19k miles$30,991 $100.per pair(201)401-7768 BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS WILL HOLD ITS 2017 REGULAR 'Collier Citizen MONTHLY MEETINGS ON THE FOLLOWING DATES COMMENCING '04 LEXUS RX 330 Light Met. Buick GMC MICHELIN PREMIER A/S AT 9:00 A.M.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED,THE MEETINGS WILL (855)362-9702 225/600 16 Tires(2)used 1 9 lines-14 Days 523550 Blue 946 mi.FL CAR ex.cond. BE HELD IN THE TRAINING ROOM AT NORTH COLLIER FIRE Other package options garaged$8,300 239-466-3856 CHEVROLET 3500 2010.diesel No NorthNaples(239)431-6502 STATION 45 LOCATED AT 1885 VETERANS PARK DRIVE,NAPLES, available 2000 BUICK LESABRE 6.6L 2WD, new:bedliner,19,0FL 34109. Silver,Clean,Leather, tontau cover,etc.$19.500. Email: Air.Good tires.88K mi. Naples(720)314-9200. Aiitc�Mlst:. Thursday y 12,2017 9:00 AM February classadenaplesnews.com $2,900(239)430-7570 Thursday February 9,2017 9:00 AM or Call 239.263-4700 FORD SUPER DUTY F-250 CUSTOM TAN VELOUR FRONT Thursday March 9,2017 9:00 AM BUICK LACROSSE 2010. 2015.616318-9,4WD,Crew Thursday April 13,2017 9:00 AM R17167A,Only 10,756 miles! Cab,King Ranch$43.991 floor mats for a Toyota Solara Thursday May 11,2017 9:00 AM $26,991.D)Vae Buick GMC DRV9e Buick GMC New.$59(239)353-6694 Thursday June B.2017 9:00 AM BIG CANOE GA (855)3629702. (855)362-9702 ;Iil Thursday July 13,2017 9:00 AM I Now accepting Short term BUICK REGAL 2010. FORD SUPER DUTY F-350 Thursday August 10.2017 9:00 AM i reonservations 3 acres in the exclusive or 2/2 cabin QM66DVlow oe Buick GMC991. 2011.b,T171King R 'h 2Crew Announcem•'�„ ThursdaThursday September 14. 2017017 9:00 AM 9:00 AM Cab,Nine Ranch$42.991 Big Canoe mountain Atlanta. 1855)362-9702 2 DeVce Buick GMC Thursday November 9,2017 207 9:00 AM an hour north of Atlanta. BUICK VERANO 2016. (855)362.9702 _ Thursday December 14,2017 9:00 AM Hot si Enjoy golf, tenni, 2Q3,6676,premium,turbo views.Eaterals.Explor, $23,991.( DRVce Buick02GMC GMCSIERRAab 2016. Chairman hColier FiierFeder Contro hiking, nearbyrbylm.mountain Chevrolet I62-9702 0o6,991 Devoe Cab 4WD Norua 4,i2r Fire Control and Rescue District shop tosu ntam - $x+6.99(DV62 Buick GMC A TRIATHLON-EVENT tWILL BE January 4,2017 No.1411152 Chevroletlmpala 2015. towns.For lits see ephotos,rates pp.991.D LTZ,Voe low miles (855)3624702 CONDUCTED-at the Vander- and 5166abiVRyBOelisting $?*,991.8 Von Buick GMC b!It Beach area, on Ss,FL Other Public Notices Other public Notices 8495166 61 7-1233 or 1155-362-9702 Vnns day Ave MariSunday, FL u ryStur- 7'A, (7067579-1233 - day and Sunday,January between DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BIG CANOE GA LEXUS.XM/CD. He. DODGE GRAND CARAVAN - 7017. On d 11:59 between Fully Loaded.XM/CD.Heated/ 7:00 AM and 11:59 PM motor- FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY Now accepting sithrr 2/2 term Cooled s,10-wayAuto power memo- 2014.Wheelchair Van tie fists should expect tempo. reservationsfor 2/2 cabin ry seats,Auto temp control, 10 lowered fir,ramp&tie rary delays on the following Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations for the City of Marco on 3 acres in the exclusive dual zone A/C,Moonro0f, clowns.(239)494-8267. roads:Vanderbilt Beach Rd, Island,Collier County,Florida, Case No.16.04.7301P.The Big Canoe mountain resort LED fog lights,HID head- Vanderbilt Dr,Bluebill Ave, Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency an hour north of Atlanta. lights,Security,Auto-dim- CI;Issic Criss Gulf Shore Dr,Collier Blvd, Management Agency(FEMA)solicits tehnical information Hot tub in deck and glorious ming mirrors,Outside temp Immokalee Rd,Oil Well Rd, or comments on proposed flood hazard determinations for views.Enjoy golf,tennis, display,NEW Battery and Ave Maria Blvd,County Line the Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM),and where applicable, hiking,waterfalls.Explore Tires,Tinted Windows, Rd,and County Road 846. the Flood Insurance Study(FIS)report for your community. &shop nearby mountain Chrome accents, On Sunda may include the addition towns.For photos,rates Woodgrain dash. and 2:30 PM motorists should ort modification ofd Base Flood determinations ons,base flood depths, and availability see listing REMAINDER of 100k WAR- NM expect temporary delays on Special Flood Hazard Area boundaries or zone designations, 7(495166 on V-0233 m or RANTY.54,000 hwY miles. Beachp g (706)579.1233 Like New.Free oil chanes/ Vanderbilt Ad.VaGn-f orFISthe regulatory beenendrevi The FIRM and,if applicable,and 0 1954igaHUDSONlrebuilt It 7x twin-HwONH Sh (Dr,Clueerll lvd. ne reportmia haverrevised atreflectar of Mflood hazard carwa295-in FM.. 23seller. Original ¢built ti Shore Sr.CollierBvBlvd,and (LOMB). accordance through nuance of 44,Letter6 of Map CodeRevision l 386 RX 350-$23,500. Full n restoredstoredm1c toads. Golden tion.Blvd.Fore more Federal,in uccoons. ThesesTitleition 65 of the isor Real Estate 'J'I SII LEXUS RX 350-2013.SUV; FullyA/C 9/10 condi- information, go online to the floodplainl Regulations. determinations are the basis for Commercial _� 9740 mi,one owner;always tion power disk brakes, http://hitstriathlonseries. the management measures that your community garaged$296.(239)394-9241 steering 4890 mi.since res. com/naples-f/maps or con- is required to adopt or show evidence of having in effect to MAZDA TRIBUTE-2006 (oration, power top. Blue tact John Eickman, HITS qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Offices/W-ii-chons,,S,de SUV,auto.1 owner.40K mi. 8315,000 olio(845)987-9267. Endurance(845)247-7275 Insurance Program. For more information on the proposed Fr. Color:Red.garaged,1,7795 flood hazard determinations and information on the statutory AAA BEAUTIFUL SUITES 732-859-1217 Personals 90-day period provided for appeals,please visit FEMA's website FROM$295.With conference at www.fema.gov/plan/prerent/fhm/life,or call the FEMA Map room.Call 239-643.1600 Sports and Imports LOOKING FORA 75-85 YR.OLD Information¢Xchange(FMIX)toll free at 1-877-FEMA MAP FEMALE for Companion to ecernber20,20. Commercial RE Lease 2005 CADILLAC AR romance who enjoys dining. December 28,2016 and leery No.1413829 NORTH NAPLES LEASE GREAT Retractable Hard Top Conv. Veli I W.I:terl sunsets o the beach and RATE Great Location,LEASRed.03K mi.like new condi- has agreatsense of humor.! 1 tilef, ` ':i.:717;-';'SL 905,9 P d: Ni'Ill S RATE Great location Tam!- tion$29,000.(239)591.1519. ABSOLUTELY ALL AUTOS- have been a Naples residentvisibi - - ami Trail,perfect for office, BMW 24 2016. Wanted.Dead or Alive Top$ since 1986.Call Alex at 239. NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING retail, yoga, karate, gym 616471AA,Convertible FREE PICK UP 239-265-6140 405-3036. NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE upg des,cal ate.72.2 in DeVoe Bu k GMC. MIIIIIIMP Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday,January 24,2017,in the etc.excellent call rate, 08 n DVoeBukkGMC Leal Notre es for more details. (855)362-9702 Board of County Commissioner's Meeting Room,Third Floor, Strategic Planning Services Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East.Naples FL., Offices Wamhnus rs/Rent BUICK CASCADA 2016. the Board of County Commissioners(BCC)will consider the 8163490.Convertible, The City of Naples Airport Authoritd1 is requesting proposals enactment of a County Ordinance.The meeting will commence PARK SHORE AREA Execu- Premium$29.991.Devoe from qualified fir s to facilitate and develop a Strategic Plan at gli.A.M.The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: rive office within large,fully Buick on(1155)3624702 that will guide the direction,priorities and key decision-making equipped professional office for the Authority over the next five years.Request for Proposal The purpose of the hearing is to consider: BUICK CASCADA 2016. documents may be obtained suite.a room, reception,con- by contacting Naples Airport Terence room,etc.$995 mo. Premiume$29991.D Vle oe 1239)Authority,643-0733 3 Aviation Drive Nfthro Naples,FLeb 34to 04at phone AN ORDINANCE OF FLORIDATO RA F NTV COMMISSIONERS 2004.0 . No lease req.(239)261-1888. tlyna lescom. downloadedardue our than 1t http:// COLLIER COUNTY, OAMENDINGT LAND DEVE NO. ENT BuickGMCG(NESTS -97, Jan a January 27 20 ResponsesCityare due it later than 12es PMe C1.O E.S AMEWHICHE ESTABLISHED THE COLLIER HE M LAND DEZO I NG 7T llyote BUSINESS PAent B16481A GENESIS mile the unaigrhY 2o.cce The Cec of yor all propos isAuthority ai a any RODE,TIOTTHE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING Tollgate Plaza, 15nv sq ft; 8,091. onlyevoe 13Kmiles the rmaitis accept or rides in blle best interest and to Authority. uthoany REGULATIONSOUNTY. FOR THE UNINCORPORATEDENDINGAREA OF COLLIERLA 140le4 Locationva door; sq ft; §18,99(55)3629702 GMC The iies or irregularities theinicy iintotestoe the any cos s ZONING FLORIDAMA BY AMENDING THEGIAPPROPRIATE tral 14 overhead doth;Bathroom: (855)362-9702 The City of Naples Airport Authority is not liable far any costs ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING $1500 A/C.Office, Available C300.R MERCEDES-BENZ er.Load- RESIDENTIAL January ncurred4 201j responding parties. No.1426450 CLASSIFICATION AGRICULF THE TURAL(A)N SZONING DISTRICT PROPERTYRIBED REAL A Now.Call Paul(239)253-4755 Red.1 Owner.Loatl- RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(RPUD)ZONING ed including se G ie.441 mi. DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD ` Recently)Cord serviced Recl s[for Bids Request f<1r Bills TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/ @ RO tires.Exc.cond.$16,000 OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED Financial �P (239)948.9268. INVITATION M BID EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD '.. SUBARU WRX 2015. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Naples Airport IN SECTION 18.TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER 63miles Premium,Deonly5,ick Authors invites sealed bids from qualified Contractors to COUNTY,FLORIDA,CONSISTING OF 9.75+/-ACRES:AND BY �'`�.' miles$27,991 Devoe Buick Y yy PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.[PUDZ-PL20160001255] GMC(855)362-9702 perform the following work,which is described in detail in the Bid Documents. A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the LOCALeekSOFTWARE BUSINESS- Board and is available for inspection.All interested parties are seeks investment 8 2-0224. BID TITLE: NAPLESCKUP MUNICIPAL -AIRPORT FACIUTIES BUILDING invited to attend and be heard. Call Barbara(239)842-8224. gU1CK ENCLAVE 2013. NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Q3,6632,Leather,low miles BID OPENING LOCATION: Naples Municipal Airport General NOTE:All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must $28,991 DeVce Buick GMC P P agister with the County manager prior t0 presentation Of (055)362-9702 Aviation Terminal the agenda item etos be addressed.etl. Individual speakers will be Recreation 2nd Floor Larson Conference B UICK ENCORE 2014. Room limited t03 minutes on any item.The selection of any individual -� 617070$,premium,only 25k to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. 160 Aviation Drive North miles,$20,991 Devoe Buick Naples,Florida 34104 If recognized by the Chairman,a spokesperson for a group or Boats/Metors,r Marine GMC(855)3624702. organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. B UICK ENCORE 2016. BID SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: Wednesday,February 1st,2017 at persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in 618 $26A,Sport Touring,save 3:00 pm E.S.T. the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum IllieEE M4.9( )362¢Buick02. of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing.In any case, FQR M U LA GMC. (855)362-9702. The Backup Generator-Facilities Building Project will include written materials intended to be considered 0 the Board shall CHEVROLET EQUINOX 2014 minor clearing,grubbing;erosion controls;earthwork,-sodding be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of BOATS.see the New a30.5, QM6662,only 16k miles, fencing:concrete;electrical and installation of a diesel pow red seven clays prior to the public hearing.All materials used in in Naples till Dec.19th LT$19,991. DeVce Buick standby generator a the Naples Municipal Airport Facilities 909 tom St.S.Ste 102 presentations before the Board will become a permanent part .,,v w.tormulaoortssoum.con, GMC.(655)362-9702 Building. of the record. z19i111.210, CHEVROLET EQUINOX 2015. Instructions to Bidders,Bid Forms,Contract Documents.Plans CAPTAIN'S LICENSE 7517195-9,LTi,great SUV and 5 a An person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board 9 download Specifications are available as of s and 4,2017 need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and Naples 877-43-318 $23911.DeVce k GMC download from in PDF format.Bids>Bids andaccompanied Employment as wi Mn.9th 87T Misty DIDenali02 electronic files in PDF format.Bids qut t 5%of the tot l d therefore,may need w ensure that a vethatimthe record y and PONTOON BOAT-Misty Han- GMC ACADIA De2014. Bid security a the form of a bid bond equal to 5%of the total bid evil eetlipgs is made,which record includes the testimony and bor.18'.Brand New.With QM6681,load,low miles made payable to the City of Naples Airport Authority.Contract evitle0te upon which the appeal is based. 401IP.Tandem a trailer. $37,991.Devoe Buick GMC security in the form of 10096 Performance and Payment Bonds If you area person witha disabilitywho needs an accommodation Naples area. §19,900. (855)362-9702 will be required. y (715)571-8103 GMC ACADIA 2017. no order to you, to the in this proceeding,you,are entitled,at OM6686.AWD.Limited All interested prime contractors are strongly urged to attend tcact toteoC'II the County provision of certain assistance. Please Campers 4 RV's $43,991 DeVce Buick GMC a Pre-Bid Conference scheduled for Tuesday,January 17,,2017 contact the Collier County,Facilities Management LDivision,- (855)362-9702 10:00 A.M.E.S.T. n the Naples Municipal Airport Facilities 5located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples.FL meeting. Buildin8.2662 Fuel Farm Road,Naples,FL 34104.Questions Assisted ed(2is ening de ce least two dans prior atthe meetible GET MORE FOR YOUR RV GMC Terrain 2015. $ Assisted listening devices for the hearing ice,impaired are available Selling or Consigning. QM6656,SLT-2,loaded! concerning the project may be submitted at the prem meeting in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Call Now! §28991.DeVce Buick GMC. or until 5:00 pm.January 25,2017 to Mike Harris,Hanson Professional Services Inc.via e-mail at mharrisehanson-int. www. 93302-esrv.e6m (855)3fi2-9702 coin. No questions will be accepted after that time. Bidders COLLIE OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (239)302-3789 GMC TERRAIN-2015. shall not contact City of Naples Airport Authority Employees, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA WANTED ALL MOTOR HOMES QM6674,SLT-1,low miles Agents,City of Naples Elected Officials,or the Engineer to DONNA FIALA.CHAIRMAN AND CAMPERS.Any cond. $26,991.Devoe Buick GMC. discuss the project.Answers to all questions will be compiled Cash Paid. (954)789.7530. (855)362-9702 into an addendum and posted on www.flynaples.com on January DWIGHT E.BROCK.CLERK GMC TERRAIN-2015. 26,2017. V. Mn Jennejohn Recreational Stericre. QM6675,SET-1,low miles Deputy ClCrk(SEAL) STORAGE: MOTORHONEE $26,991.Devoe Buick GMC. All Bidders must be licensed in accordance with Florida Laws. January 4,2017 No.1424132 (855)362-9702 The Authority recognizes fair and open competition as a basic RVs, boat, auto. Covered GMC YUKON 2016. tenet of public,procurement. Respondents doing business available. (239)643-0447 1M6677.4WD.SLT,loaded with the Authority are prohibited from discriminating on the $59.991 Defoe Buick GMC basis of race,color,creed,national origin,handicap,age or �/7 R� Sell Recreational Trailrs. (855)36b9702 sex. The NAA has a progressive prises Program inority. RUJ W fast! GMC YUKON XL 2036. and Women-Owned Business Enterprises and I place L THIS WEEK'S SPECIAL and entourages Disadvantaged,Minority,and cess. Owned 2de outr el room. Like 28' $$59,991 D,SLT, Business fNeses Airort uth rit in its process. Slide out rSAVE Like New save E E 059,991 DeVce Buick The Cory at Naplesities r irregularities Authority i ny bids the right to reject j n 19730 SouthSUS 41,Ft,Myers R17126A,2.51limiie 9702 any$22,991 for the work,whichever lisrdeemedbtosbe inived and the0nerr's best Naples Daily News Loealfieds HOLIDAY RV TRAILER SALES SUBARU OUTBACK 2010. any or all bids or to award or refrain from awarding the contract 239-590.0066 or visit: Devoe Buick GMC. interests. hol!dayrvftmyersMgmail.com (855)362-9702 January 4,2017 No.1427110 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO 9A THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR SIGNATURE Print on pink paper. Attach to original document. The completed routing slip and original documents are to be forwarded to the County Attorney Office at the time the item is placed on the agenda. All completed routing slips and original documents must be received in the County Attorney Office no later than Monday preceding the Board meeting. **NEW** ROUTING SLIP Complete routing lines#1 through#2 as appropriate for additional signatures,dates,and/or information needed. If the document is already complete with the exception of the Chairman's stgnatun, draw a line through routing lines#I trough#2,complete the checklist,and forward to the County Attorney Office. Route to Addressee(s) (List in routing order) Office Initials Date 2. 3 County Attorney Office County Attorney Office 4. BCC Office Board of County Commissioners "V N4 5. Minutes and Records Clerk of Court's Office 21))7a p.,14 PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION Normally the primary contact is the person who created/prepared the Executive Summary. Primary contact information is needed in the event one of the addressees above,may need to contact staff for additional or missing information. Name of Primary Staff Eric Johnson Phone Number 239-252 931 Contact/ Department Growth Managemen Department Agenda Date Item was January 24,2017 Agenda Item Number 9.A Approved by the BCC Type of Document Ordinance dOr Number of Original 1 Attached !�! Documents Attached PO number or account number if document is to be recorded INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST Initial the Yes column or mark"N/A" in the Not Applicable column,whichever is Yes N/A(Not appropriate. (Initial) Applicable) 1. Does the document require the chairman's original signature? No 2. Does the document need to be sent to another agency for additional signatures? If yes, N/A provide the Contact Information(Name;Agency; Address; Phone)on an attached sheet. 3, Original document has been signed/initialed for legal sufficiency. (All documents to be 6,'!" " signed by the Chairman,with the exception of most letters,must be reviewed and signed by the Office of the County Attorney. 4. All handwritten strike-through and revisions have been initialed by the County N/A Attorney's Office and all other parties except the BCC Chairman and the Clerk to the Board 5, The Chairman's signature line date has been entered as the date of BCC approval of the document or the final negotiated contract date whichever is applicable. 6. "Sign here"tabs are placed on the appropriate pages indicating where the Chairman's signature and initials are required. r 7. In most cases(some contracts are an exception),the original document and this routing " , slip should be provided to the County Attorney Office at the time the item is input into SIRE. Some documents are time sensitive and require forwarding to Tallahassee within a certain time frame or the BCC's actions are nullified. Be aware of your deadlines' 8, The document was approved by the BCC on January 24,2017 and all changes 1t iS Ot,an made during the meeting have been incorporated in the attached document. The an` rifti' this County Attorney's Office has reviewed the changes,if applicable. I s 9, Initials of attorney verifying that the attached document is the version approved by the 11`1°pis note BCC,all changes directed by the BCC have been made,and the document is ready forf/�(" o s a"on for this the Chairman's signature. I" 1`_ tie' I:Forms/County Fortes/BCC Forms/Original Documents Routing Slip WWS Original 9.03.04,Revised 1.26.05, ' vised 2.24.05;Re ',ed 11/30/12 9 A ORDINANCE NO. 17-0 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, Inc. representing developer, WCI Communities, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a 9.75+/- acre project to be known as the Hamilton Place RPUD to allow up to 66 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units in accordance with the RPUD Documents, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "F" and incorporated herein by reference. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. [16-CPS-01571] 79 Hamilton Place RPUD PUDZ-PL20160001255 12/19/16 1 of 2 CAC 9A SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this j`i1"day of ja n act r N , 2017. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E FROCK; CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By; f ►.-` .:11r4h, By: Deputy Clerk PENNY 'AYLOR , Chairman attest as to Chairman's'. signature on!v, Approved as to form and legality: kcA Heidi Ashton-Cicko , Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A—Permitted Uses Exhibit B—Development Standards Exhibit C—Master Plan Exhibit D—Legal Description Exhibit E—List of Deviations Exhibit F—Developer Commitments This ordinance filed with the Sec tory of tote's Office the - 'cloyof leave rC 0 I Z and ocknowledgeme 2 t of that filing received _this 7, day of k-t, By 'a ' `.r V [16-CPS-01571] 79 Hamilton Place RPUD PUDZ-PL20160001255 12/19/16 2 of 2 CAO 9A EXHIBIT A FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD Regulations for development of the Hamilton Place RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Document and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 66 residential dwelling units shall be permitted within the RPUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Dwelling Units — Multi-family, single family detached, single family attached and single family variable lot line. 2. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or the Hearing Examiner. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Customary accessory uses associated with the principal uses permitted in this RPUD, including but not limited to garages, carports, swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures and utility buildings. 2. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 4. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner. AMENITY AREA A. Principal Uses: Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 1 of 8 12/15/2016 r.,; 9A 1. Clubhouses with cafes, snack bars and similar uses intended to serve residents and guests. 2. Community administrative and recreation facilities. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis/pickle ball courts and basketball courts, parks, playgrounds, pedestrian/bikeways, and passive and/or active water features (private intended for use by the residents and their guests only). 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, landscape nurseries, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters to serve residents and their guests. 4. Tennis clubs, health spas, fitness facilities and other indoor recreational uses (private, intended for use by the residents and their guests only). B. Accessory Uses: 1. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 2. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner. PRESERVE A. Allowable Uses: 1. Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve area to be retained. 2. Mitigation for environmental permitting. 3. Passive Recreation areas, as per LDC requirements. 4. Water management as allowed by the LDC. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 2 of 8 12/15/2016 EXHIBIT B 9A FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD 1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Hamilton Place RPUD Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. STANDARDS SINGLE-FAMILY VARIABLE LOT SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY AMENITY DETACHED LINE FOR SINGLE ATTACHED CENTER FAMILY Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1 acre 10,000 SF Minimum Lot Width *3 50 feet 40 feet 35 feet 100 feet N/A Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet N/A Minimum Front Yard *1,*6 20 feet*2 20 feet*2 20 feet*2 20 feet N/A Minimum Side Yard 5 feet 0- 10 feet*4 0 or 5 feet 10 feet N/A Minimum Rear Yard *6 Principal 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet N/A Maximum Height Zoned (not to exceed 2 stories) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Actual (not to exceed 2 stories) 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet Minimum Distance Between 12 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A Principal Structures *5 Floor Area Min. (S.F.) 1500 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF N/A PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet i t4 S � R��T ii� - :;:fa�"'-.i', ,l`ur 4`.ya@3�` . 0. %3" 6 0,14° "r�� 4 ada1, r ' Front *2 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Side 5 feet 0 feet 0 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard *6 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Structures Maximum Height Zoned (not to exceed 2 stories) 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Actual (not to exceed 2 stories) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type, and not the minimum lot area, shall define the development standards to be applied by the Growth Management Department during an application for a building permit. For variable lot single family and single family attached units, a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configurations, including building setbacks and building separations, shall be submitted to the Growth Management Division with the application for the first building permit for the platted development tract. Verification of ingress/egress for maintenance shall be provided for variable lot line single-family units. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. *1—Front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. B. If the parcel is served by a private road,setback is measured from the back of curb(if curbed)or edge of pavement(if not curbed). Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 3 of 8 12/15/2016 -� 9 A C. If the parcel has frontage on two sides, setback is measured from the side with the shortest frontage with the other frontage designated as a side yard. *2—Front entry garages must be a minimum of 20', and a minimum of 23' from a sidewalk. Porches, entry features and roofed courtyards may be reduced to 15'. *3—Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20%for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. *4—The side setback may be variable between zero feet(0')to ten feet(10')as long as a 10-foot minimum separation between principal structures is maintained. If the variable lot line for single-family option is utilized,the owner shall provide with the building permit application,the setback of the principal structures on the abutting lots of all sides. *5—Building distance may be reduced at garages to a minimum of 0'where attached garages are provided and a 10' minimum building separation is maintained,if detached. *6— No front building setback is required from the 30' wide access easement, which extends along the southerly boundary of the Hamilton Place PUD. However,a landscape buffer shall be required. Note:nothing in this RPUD Document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 4 of 8 12/15/2016 Z 9A W N p __im w(nw. cn .coo. omoyF 0 — CDn g>z> LIVINGSTON ROAD ch m--I 3-0 1 o �Z-Z3 1 mg -W11%2c - -03°'�r L -og-z 0Om- ( n) _u mcomm \ O�zm * 3, I A' .Z I o 0 gPP tic 0 m m y DD O N w ' 0 3 D w ^� c"D Cm) CO I m 0 x 0 og $ cn -a pm m r rD 77 m o > X z Z 00m 226 0 I N D -Z - aa A 3 m NO CO I Z N I m - I I o m co v 30 I 30 `"-'qzz M ., A y I z s ° (£#310N 33S) I w �' O 1WS3 m o I oo N a > A£ -i D C c O I I cci� umi m I kVA m mm n h Cn I zl mm ▪ c m 5.4 -� cn -o ▪ „, r N � I 1 oc mZ Tm I mo m gyp = I Z.-- c � _ 'At —I -0 ' ^v O � " m Z cn p I I I�1 1- --II 5A 0p I FA_ CO > m mm Z 0 � � I I ° o co v Ti I c) m co C m m `ria H a A 0 Q7y I -)1!.3 -< >13 • r I COM m o 0 5 : I T W A CA I m Dy `� 1 XI cn m m -0 Co � Itt afar EE I "moo 303 Dg cm I mz Z 20 W t -0 3 3 ti I rr��'� ��r -O� r r r r r r zn R O Cmm 33 D m \r9 r2 /9 r, /2 /2 ' 1 13 I 1:11j < Cm WD �>m' I E �) 0 < 3 3 m cn_1 m m(n. y E E E E E E E E E I m '0 m m m Oa m m m m z 0 m 4 E 4 E E E E E E 3 0 0 mg70,,x7,---4m> I E E E E E E E E Eb m O 0 n I- zDm>MIM E E E 2 1-{ ��>:1 E E E A. d,. E E E Im m 01+ µ m > E E D D I E E E E E E E E E AA C - m < Z Z 3 E E E E E E E E E 0 mmm C D zE E E E E E E Vi L)cn u) C) I y 0 N 30 m m J. _ --- — — — - Ci,C �rn m iD rnrn �-000cn0 No— oIzV v �KO -rn0 XX l+ - µ N D n(n p 1+ yrr rr > I nn 3Ai3S32d 3Sf ' K A•te c z D n I s—z—•-- Fa n and S3Nv1 NO1JNIv a3NOZ / ''\a ; EXHIBIT D 9 A FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504066) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 528.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504081) THE WEST 264 FEET AND THE EAST 264 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504087) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 792.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 1056.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 6 of 8 12/15/2016 EXHIBIT E 9 A FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LIST OF DEVIATIONS No Deviations requested. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 7 of 8 12/15/2016 C�9 9A EXHIBIT F FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is WCI Communities, LLC, 24301 Walden Center Drive, Bonita Springs, FL 34135. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2. MISCELLANEOUS a. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. b. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development 3. ENVIRONMENTAL a. The RPUD shall be required to preserve 15% of native vegetation, 6.46± acres of native vegetation exists on-site requiring a minimum preservation of 0.97± acres (6.46 x .15 = 0.97) of native vegetation to be retained. b. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic removal in accordance with LDC Section 4.06.02 and LDC Section 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07. 4. WATER MANAGEMENT The project's stormwater management system shall be designed to discharge to the east into the Whippoorwill Flowway. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 8 of 8 12/15/2016 I A 4YC' Ew� iVi 3C G .-4, , E "•,?!;:, Ouf trj-,.. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of STATE RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Governor Secretary of State January 30, 2017 Honorable Dwight E. Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court , Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples, Florida 34101-3044 Attention: Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk I Dear Mr. Brock: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes,this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 17-02,which was filed in this office on January 30, 2017. Sincerely, Ernest L. Reddick Program Administrator ELR/lb R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 www.dos.state.fl.us 9A FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST NAME—FIRST NAME—MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD,COUNCIL,COMMISSION,AUTHORITY,OR COMMITTEE Solis, Andrew I. Collier County Board of County Commissioners MAILING ADDRESS THE BOARD,COUNCIL,COMMISSION,AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 300 WHICH I SERVE ISA UNIT OF: CITY COUNTY ❑CITY afCOUNTY ❑OTHER LOCAL AGENCY Naples Collier NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: Collier County I DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED MY POSITION IS: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 of ELECTIVE ❑ APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which would inure to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also MUST ABSTAIN from knowingly voting on a measure which would inure to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent, subsidiary,or sibling organization of a principal by which he or she is retained);to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate.Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies(CRAB)under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law.A"business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner,joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder(where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). R f R f R R R t Y R R t R R R f ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above,you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting,who should incorporate the form in the minutes. • R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you are not prohibited by Section 112.3143 from otherwise participating in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must complete and file this form(before making any attempt to influence the decision)with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting,who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on page 2) CE FORM 813-EFF. 11/2013 PAGE 1 Adopted by reference in Rule 34-7.010(1)(f),F.A.C. 9A APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting,who must incorporate the form in the minutes.A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST Andrew I. Solishereby disclose that on January 24 20 17 • (a)A measure came or will come before my agency which(check one or more) inured to my special private gain or loss; • inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, • inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, inured to the special gain or loss of a client of my law firm, WCI by whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of which is the parent subsidiary, or sibling organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b)The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: BCC Agenda Item 9A is a recommendation to change the zoning classification of a designated parcel to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD) known as Hamilton Place. The Developer, WCI, is a client of my law firm, and in an abundance of caution, I will abstain from voting pursuant to Section 286.012, Fla. Stat. to avoid any perceived prejudice or bias. If disclosure of specific information would violate confidentiality or privilege pursuant to law or rules governing attorneys, a public officer, who is also an attorney, may comply with the disclosure requirements of this section by disclosing the nature of the interest in such a way as to provide the public with notice of the conflict. /j ,;' ffr ' January 24, 2017 / �( Date Filed Sall NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED$10,000. CE FORM 8B-EFF.11/2013 PAGE 2 Adopted by reference in Rule 34-7.010(1)(f),F.A.C. 9A ' Agenda Item No. j Agenda Item Topic 1 (For Public Comment,list topic) /L9 Meeting Date: I(i 9 Name: "x{rYie lei I4ILtt1� Address: iq roitlGA 1Q I Ly)it.� Representing/Petitioner: ti rt(ta w C d Lf C —_ Other COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24.REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO.ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS—PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ExParte 9A Ex parte Items - Commissioner Fiala COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA 01/24/2017 ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A)zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Hamilton Place RPUD to allow development of up to 66 single- family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.75+/-acres; and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20160001255]. z l Ci tt Lf Piro Ridge-RD 1 5 ca Ec _ 1 PROJECTt LOCATION G. 1J NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE ['Meetings []Correspondence IPle-mails ❑Calls Staff Report 9 A 4 , Ex parte Items - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA 01/24/2017 ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Hamilton Place RPUD to allow development of up to 66 single-family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18,Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.75+/-acres; and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] NO DISCLOS -f&R TIIIS ITEM SEE FILE ®Meetings: Rich Yovanovich and Wayne Arnold ®Correspondence - staff report from agenda ®e-mails — Dianna Quintanilla requesting meeting for Rich and Wayne ❑Calls CONSENT AGENDA 16.A.3. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the minor final plat of Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples Benvenuto Court Replat,Application Number P120160002720. NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM- SEE FILE ❑Meetings ®Correspondence - Back-up from agenda e-mails ❑Calls t 9 A SUMMARY AGENDA - NO ITEMS NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE ❑Meetings ❑Correspondence ❑e-mails Calls 7 FilsonSue 9 A From: Dianna Quintanilla <DQuintanilla@cyklawfirm.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 8:19 AM To: FilsonSue Subject: RE: Meeting Request: Hamilton PUD Perfect, thank you. Dianna Quintanilra Legal Assistant to Richard D. COLEMAN Yovanovich,Esq. 0 YOVA N OV C H Coleman Yovanovich & Koester,P.A. T 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite KO ESTER Naples,Florida 34103 (239) 435-3535 (239) 435-1218 (I) This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication in error,please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the above email address.Thank you. From: FilsonSue [mailto:SueFilson@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 6:08 PM To: Dianna Quintanilla Subject: RE: Meeting Request: Hamilton PUD Hi Dianna, I'll put them in on Friday January 20th from 10:30 - 11:00. Please let me know if this is acceptable. Sue Filson, Aide to William L. McDaniel,Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel From: Dianna Quintanilla [mailto:DQuintanilla@cyklawfirm.com] Sent: Friday,January 13, 2017 4:38 PM 1 To: FilsonSue<SueFilson@colliergov.net> 1 9 A Subject: Meeting Request: Hamilton PUD Good afternoon, Rich would like to meet with you, along with Wayne Arnold,regarding the upcoming agenda item, Hamilton PUD. Would you be available any of the following times below: Wednesday January 18th Friday January 20th, after 9:30 Monday January 23rd Thank you. Dianna Quintaniffa COLEMAN OLEMA Legal Assistant to Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. 0 YOVA N OV I C H Coleman Yovanovich & Koester,P.A. KCS E STE R 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples,Florida 34103 (239) 435-3535 (239) 435-1218 (t) This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication in error,please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the above email address.Thank you. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 9.A.1 Collier County 9 A STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2016 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20160001255 HAMILTON PLACE RPUD o. d PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owners: Applicant (Contract Purchaser): E Maria Santos Edmund and Betty Poore WCI Communities, LLC 2316 Andrew Drive 7025 Nighthawk Drive 24301 Walden Center Drive Naples, FL 34112 Naples, FL 34105 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 N Elfrieda H Sutherland Trust Agent: a do Gayle Ann Durrance 2076 Sagebrush Circle D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Naples, FL 34120 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Ray Bonita Springs, FL 34134 6' E REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an w application to rezone property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition seeks to rezone the property to RPUD to allow for the development of up to sixty-six (66) single-family and/or multi-family dwelling units on 9.75± acres. (See location map on page 2) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 1 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 41 (andu aoeid uo}liweH : P6pZ) iodat1 Me}S- 1. }uawyoe}}y :}uawyoe}} ' -- cv ,,,,.fff tti n. u 0060J0€ 0FJ0311;n111111111/: w r 3.IY0 H1NV30000 ..,.° Koo 700 obey 1 e my wu„,,6 4, ! 8 C/z = I .6! J l r l/7 l i�_ 00 ow DOM/o O.i....-s, @ 0 0� ( 0 arae s �w�8 �� T %J : 0 ®� G F a %� Tg ?i _ T, r = .0 dT N ; ,,s,..r 1- I- ),,, i 012 m w 0 a N -X 0 ! i g 0 = 0 d 88 0 T- E E V CO o co 0 ? ap ?00090050000000000,9® _l a=1 tiiddi id,i= ce ��a, o 1; N / Z U L wam ID O v t N ,✓ j`�; C o , ‘...:___,,,. .. N I..-- iJ f CO I i _ O � o 0 I CO CN On \ �-- i w i = y 7 Q I r a p c? N _ s fiui odai 0_ I o • 9.A.1 The FLUE provision for the Density Rating System states, 9 A If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be added. The density band around a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map and shall not apply within the Estates Designation or for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area. More than fifty percent (50%) of the project is located within the density band, so the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. nwiN The FLUE Consistency Review provides a more comprehensive analysis of how the proposed project is consistent with the relative objectives and policies of the GMP (see Attachment 3 — 5 FLUE Consistency Review). In short, the proposed RPUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. E Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2014 and 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). d Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to f operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links(roadway segments)directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 4 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 44 9 A 9.A.1 or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD Document to address environmental concerns. The location of the preserve was selected to retain the highest quality wetlands on-site and to provide connectivity to existing preserves and flowways on neighboring properties to the east. No listed species of wildlife were observed on the property. Air plants (Tillandsia) have been observed on cypress trees within the RPUD and will be retained or relocated in accordance with the requirements LDC Section 3.04.03. This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory--Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Landscape Review: The Master Plan shows that a fifteen (15)-foot wide Type "B" Buffer is ce proposed along the project's north property line, except in areas depicted as preserve, such as in the northeast corner of the site as well as along the RPUD's entire eastern boundary. EC. A thirty (30)-foot wide access easement runs along the entire southern property boundary. As such, the south landscape buffer, proposed just north of this access easement, is depicted as either a fifteen (15)-foot wide Type "A" Buffer or a ten (10)-foot wide Type "B" Buffer, depending on how the subject project is developed. N_ A twenty (20)-foot wide Type "D" Buffer is proposed along Livingston Road. 0 a Each single-family lot is required to provide at least one (1) canopy tree. The proposed right-of- way will be wide enough to accommodate trees in connection with a street tree program pursuant to LDC Section 4.06.05.A.1 if it is determined that the lot sizes and building setbacks do not provide enough room to accommodate the requisite trees. It should be noted, however, that this type of detailed analysis to ensure compliance with the LDC will appropriately occur during a subsequent development process. c.) ° School District: At this time there is sufficient capacity within the elementary and middle concurrency service areas and in an adjacent high school concurrency service area of the proposed development. At the time of SDP or platting,the project will be evaluated for school concurrency. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Utilities Review: Water and wastewater service will be provided by the Collier County Water- Sewer District, which has adequate public utility facilities readily available along Livingston Rd. All water distribution and wastewater collection systems shall be conveyed to the District. County Utility Easements shall be dedicated for all utility facilities to be owned, operated, and maintained by the District. Design, construction, and conveyance of the utility facilities shall conform to current Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures. Applicable system development charges and connection fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 6 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 46 9 A -;e1 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements,restrictions on design,and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least sixty percent (60%) of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of ec a) available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. CIS The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies,to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. ea 8. Conformity with PUD regulations,or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case,based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 5 co No deviations are proposed in connection with this request to rezone to RPUD. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 8 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 48 9.A.1 9 A Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed rezoning request for up to sixty-six (66) residential units is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area, provided the project's stormwater management system is designed to discharge into the Whippoorwill Flowway. Stormwater Best Management Practices, treatment, and storage on this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting with the South Florida Water Management District, and County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, including stormwater calculations, at time of SDP and/or plat. a 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated this RPUD would reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent co areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination a is driven by market value. co ce 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The Hiwasse CPUD is currently vacant and staff does not anticipate this proposed RPUD would serve as a deterrent to its improvement. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 10 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 50 9 A 9.A.1 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on September 27, 2016 at the Naples Church of Christ in Naples, Florida. The meeting commenced at 5:37 p.m. and ended at approximately 6:11 p.m. The NIM meeting minutes are included in Attachment 2—Application and Support Material. Many of the questions dealt with the proposed density, buffering, recreation/amenities, and location of access point. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: a. The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on November 28, 2016. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. 1 Attachments: 1) Proposed Ordinance 2) Application and Support Material a 3) FLUE Consistency Review 4) Density Map 5) Legal Notifications 6) Emails_Letters from Public a) V cc) w Q PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 12 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 52 - =itiacitt= - ..ommissioner Saunders' - 9 A COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA 01/24/2017 ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.A This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Hamilton Place RPUD to allow development of up to 66 single-family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.75+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ- PL20160001255] NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE XMeetings UCorrespondence ( le-mails Calls Meeting with Rich Yovanovich, Wayne Arnold; received Staff Report. CONSENT AGENDA 16.A.3 This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the minor final plat of Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples Benvenuto Court Replat, Application Number PL20160002720. X NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE ❑Meetings Correspondence e-mails I (Calls I a Q ./i MI,r,-CIOLII 01 I O N W =W L.I1 N 3 3 N v - ry LL i- .-NNN N VI • Nato Z tn N r--,I.‘--OD Vl rNN LL ON r sHNmN H O N V,-00N 0 3 I C roo1-Nm p NOiipNO I . • N N Il .g aa a I C N �n It li 11 N Q C Y -oma E J a 0 E w E I I u i w m 0 i m m 1111410 '1' = 9 m▪ o u O `w ° E v r W c m J E N � _ o O Y 3 n m c v N < 3 0 • No N O y C N C J I = > C n 1 u CN • z o`e v CO lin U- r00 01 Q r N c— 1N M I Ln I a Q ./i MI,r,-CIOLII 01 I O N W =W L.I1 N 3 3 N v - ry LL i- .-NNN N VI • Nato Z tn N r--,I.‘--OD Vl rNN LL ON r sHNmN H O N V,-00N 0 3 I C roo1-Nm p NOiipNO I . • N N Il .g aa a I C N �n It li 11 N Q C Y -oma E J a 0 E w E I I u i w m 0 i m m 1111410 '1' = 9 m▪ o u O `w ° E v r W c m J E N � _ o O Y 3 n m c v N < 3 0 • No N O y C N C J I = > C n 1 u CN • z o`e v CO lin U- r00 01 Q r N c— 1N M I Ln 9.A.1 Co rer County 9 A STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2016 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20160001255 HAMILTON PLACE RPUD a w PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owners: Applicant(Contract Purchaser): E Maria Santos Edmund and Betty Poore WCI Communities, LLC 2316 Andrew Drive 7025 Nighthawk Drive 24301 Walden Center Drive Naples, FL 34112 Naples, FL 34105 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 N Elfrieda H Sutherland Trust Agent: a do Gayle Ann Durrance ce 2076 Sagebrush Circle D. Wayne Arnold, AICP CO Naples, FL 34120 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. in 3800 Via Del Ray Bonita Springs, FL 34134 c E REQUESTED ACTION: co The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition seeks to rezone the property to RPUD to allow for the development of up to sixty-six (66) single-family and/or multi-family dwelling units on 9.75±acres. (See location map on page 2) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 1 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 41 (andel aoejd uo;fiweH : 1761Z) ioda21 De;S- I. ;uewyoe;;d :;uawyoe;;b' r CD �, o 0 d — o ®5 € o. 41,© cc c c c„,c c c c Nazi wiiiii, ® CO 0 ... �� CL � V� °3 U IX I 0 Cir i 8CI w = r)r i )))J)))amb)): 6 t 112.0.6<,,,,,z 9 a l -Ty' ao . ,a z 2 ) )) � ao "T_ Fes_ -� __ ik a _ ®®® .�..._ sus ,.� �,� �� ? -r CI a - nr-. -7— ao WO - N ,IBM I _fl �.m".. m a O O t LU N o v ;,2 8 o =a o r E _ O c, (� :" JJR:�'ID JJJ 90G)),9)))0( " �: e� r f'. erU w -e )))) i<a N °i o Q Y j F,.,,,„r ,' z N O I 0 O co ii ti N CO - o `,L - \V O III 'I O 1 _ GH UO1StJUTA � t t .� J� CO _.-E'r 0N _ N r H O J l V N 0) ct 1 W ` -0 7 I —,-1A r f r a � <- Y i T w N-auBU�lld-TJodJIy o _ �� ti a c , E — 1 N 0 O 0 I 9.A.1 i 9A SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: The subject project proposes a density of 6.77 dwelling units per acre (DU/AC). This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding boundaries of the Hamilton Place RPUD: North: Single-family residential, zoned Brynwood Preserve PUD (5.47 DU/AC) East: Residential, zoned Arlington Lakes PUD (6.0 DU/AC) South: Multi-family residential (condomimums), zoned Arlington Lakes PUD (6.0 DU/AC) CL West: Right-of-way for Livingston Road, farther west is vacant commercial, zoned M Hiwasse CPUD (291,000 square feet) ce d co a ca ,�,yy"Y± 3 c ` OW:HOSP*aM.r - -2 i of_ r ye 19 P ese'V e;:L'EN !► �► t+. ,. t ,'M`` rrnt^� .:, g - - y. rare J = �yi �I ARLINGTON 1# WH{pPOORY'JILL I m T�'4 �'S! Ci�.i�� „�4i�'p�q�p� s'-'1,:t L4KE5 .�-,�y a} O 4 't,; 6 # .'it2�lrr3 plryM'i yd.0171:411 It p�A1ytm a ;\�. a A '.i +I'A�gdal c r 8 .e -.� on` S t' J N 9ht hawk JR Y f + AY PO - ,..! f `' N ghlh k UK�.� 'e Rd �`- cs' POk t E a WHIP ORWILL ., ry d.+ t (-1-1---'' w �� n ro'd LN CIR _o o ,,. F .„ iiNNES q �4 �Zon n FlD�'^-0 ? z'41-,....' v: lk. .. >° Raft na C.T .1'7:17'1:w !:47(774621-114:414g $ . +4 _ .. i Pos lanu CpR . ;-^ 'Ma Pd EVANS ♦ .. YiCIRr iPP. ifill-- • E NAPLES ' tiYo CPUD 1 'Y� J- -ay p.w Mi r p o s as — = ti' Ai. CHURCHOF .z— ♦�a ; @i1t30'P#t0F91i tddi'iiti_ o " CHRIST 4Senano CIR # '. .�..f L t i IUD Y 5 7 =Y lC ..7 e .F � 4:1011041 ' " Gziaid�LN ` +'�. Z2ontn9'PUD =�,� -:,� po er Zoning A., ��tPo_r1dr iyg�� y _ i`, . g4:.,aYrc�.C"'i�'Kw LN Ll• -„=,...WH{PPOORN�LL WOODSP” .47: Aerial(County GIS) u m w GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: a Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban designated area(Urban Mixed Use District,Urban Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The property is also located within a mile of the Pine Ridge Road - I- 75 Mixed Use Activity Center (MUAC#10). PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 3 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 43-1 9.A.1 9A The FLUE provision for the Density Rating System states, If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be added. The density band around a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map and shall not apply within the Estates Designation or for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area. More than fifty percent (50%) of the project is located within the density band, so the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. a. The FLUE Consistency Review provides a more comprehensive analysis of how the proposed project is consistent with the relative objectives and policies of the GMP (see Attachment 3 — f6 FLUE Consistency Review). In short, the proposed RPUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. E CD Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement for consistency N with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2014 and 2015 Annual Update 0 and Inventory Reports (AUIR). a Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element cp (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway Q segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links(roadway segments)directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 4 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 44 9.A.1 9A c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. The proposed rezoning to allow a maximum of sixty-six (66) multi-family units on the subject property that will generate approximately 43 PM peak hour, peak direction trips on the immediately adjacent roadway link, Livingston Road. Livingston Road is a six-lane divided facility and has a current service volume of 3,100 trips,with a remaining capacity of approximately 1,624 trips between Pine Ridge Road/Golden Gate Parkway, and is currently at LOS B as shown in the 2015 AUIR. Please note at the time of writing this report the 2016 AUIR was not yet adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (Board); however, staff reviewed this road segment for the CCPC's consideration, finding a remaining capacity of 1,594 trips and the same LOS B. Staff, a) therefore, finds that the proposed project does not significantly impact the adjacent roadway links, as and there is sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the five(5)-year transportation planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. cti x Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): eraN Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). A minimum of 0.97 acre of native vegetation is required to be Q, retained for the RPUD. a' GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to or amend RPUDs shall be in the form of an RPUD Master Plan of w development, along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The RPUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5,Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report(referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 5 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 45 9.A.1 9A 1. or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD Document to address environmental concerns. The location of the preserve was selected to retain the highest quality wetlands on-site and to provide connectivity to existing preserves and flowways on neighboring properties to the east. No listed species of wildlife were observed on the property. Air plants (Tillandsia)have been observed on cypress trees within the RPUD and will be retained or relocated in accordance with the requirements LDC Section 3.04.03. This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Landscape Review: The Master Plan shows that a fifteen (15)-foot wide Type "B" Buffer is a. proposed along the project's north property line, except in areas depicted as preserve, such as in the northeast corner of the site as well as along the RPUD's entire eastern boundary. f° A thirty (30)-foot wide access easement runs along the entire southern property boundary. As such, the south landscape buffer, proposed just north of this access easement, is depicted as eitherca a fifteen (15)-foot wide Type "A" Buffer or a ten (10)-foot wide Type "B" Buffer, depending on = how the subject project is developed. N_ A twenty (20)-foot wide Type "D" Buffer is proposed along Livingston Road. ° a Each single-family lot is required to provide at least one (1) canopy tree. The proposed right-of- re way will be wide enough to accommodate trees in connection with a street tree program pursuant to LDC Section 4.06.05.A.1 if it is determined that the lot sizes and building setbacks do not provide enough room to accommodate the requisite trees. It should be noted, however, that this type of detailed analysis to ensure compliance with the LDC will appropriately occur during a subsequent development process. co School District: At this time there is sufficient capacity within the elementary and middle concurrency service areas and in an adjacent high school concurrency service area of the proposed development. At the time of SDP or platting,the project will be evaluated for school concurrency. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Utilities Review: Water and wastewater service will be provided by the Collier County Water- Sewer District, which has adequate public utility facilities readily available along Livingston Rd. All water distribution and wastewater collection systems shall be conveyed to the District. County Utility Easements shall be dedicated for all utility facilities to be owned, operated, and maintained by the District. Design, construction, and conveyance of the utility facilities shall conform to current Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures. Applicable system development charges and connection fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 6 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 46 9.A.1 9A , . I Zoning Services Review: Staff analyzed the proposed uses and associated development standards. The abutting development to the north, Brynwood Preserve PUD,has been developed with single- family detached dwellings. The PUD Document for this PUD also allows for two-family dwellings and multi-family dwellings. To the south and east, the Arlington Lakes PUD allows single-family detached dwellings, single-family attached dwellings, zero-lot-line, patio dwellings, and multi- family dwellings. The Arlington Lakes PUD also allows Group Care Facilities(category I and II), care units, nursing homes, and the like. The uses proposed in the Hamilton Place RPUD (i.e., single-family detached, single-family attached, single-family variable lot line, and multi-family dwellings) are comparable and compatible to the uses approved in the aforementioned PUDs. With respect to development standards, staff evaluated the standards of the proposed RPUD and compared them with the standards of the Brynwood Preserve PUD and the Arlington Lakes PUD. The Brynwood Preserve PUD has been developed with single-family detached homes. The Arlington Lakes PUD to the south has been developed with condominium buildings. Staff determined the proposed development standards are comparable and compatible with the a_ development standards of the aforementioned PUDs. a) PUD FINDINGS: n. 0 LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the = findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": v N_ 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land,surrounding areas, traffic and access, a drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject site fronts on Livingston Road. Water and wastewater facilities are located in within the right-of-way, and each has enough capacity to serve the proposed RPUD. Drainage solutions would be evaluated in connection with SDP/platting and construction permits. (13 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application,which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals,objectives,and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report (or within an accompanying memorandum). PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 7 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 47 9 A 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements,restrictions on design,and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least sixty percent (60%) of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of rx available improvements and facilities,both public and private. a The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e.,GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate re expansion. coco The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies,to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. its 8. Conformity with PUP regulations,or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case,based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such E regulations. No deviations are proposed in connection with this request to rezone to RPUD. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 8 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 48 9.A.1 9 A Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals,objectives,and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding a. Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. coCf. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. There are no other RPUDs located within the immediate vicinity of the subject property; i however, the proposed project relates well to the surrounding projects, particularly those containing residential land uses. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. a X The rectangular shape boundary of the RPUD logically follows the external boundary of the parcels assembled for the rezoning. co 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. a The proposed change is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. co The proposed RPUD is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the a neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e.,GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 9 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 49-1 9AJ-1,46 Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. S. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed rezoning request for up to sixty-six (66) residential units is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area, provided the project's stormwater management system is designed to discharge into the Whippoorwill Flowway. Stormwater Best Management Practices, treatment, and storage on this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting with the South Florida Water Management District, and County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, including stormwater calculations, at time of SDP and/or plat. a. ce 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated this RPUD would reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results,which may be internal or N external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning;however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination a is driven by market value. m CO 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development t of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. c The Hiwasse CPUD is currently vacant and staff does not anticipate this proposed RPUD c would serve as a deterrent to its improvement. 03 Q 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. E V If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are a consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 10 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 50 9A 9.R.1 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed design standards cannot be achieved without rezoning to an RPUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff's opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. a) The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not a specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which E would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses = under the proposed zoning classification. •41- Any development anticipated by the RPUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, d and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. a.+ The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the RPUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no impact on public facility adequacy in regard to utilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health,safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 11 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 51 9A ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on September 27, 2016 at the Naples Church of Christ in Naples, Florida. The meeting commenced at 5:37 p.m. and ended at approximately 6:11 p.m. The NIM meeting minutes are included in Attachment 2 —Application and Support Material. Many of the questions dealt with the proposed density, buffering, recreation/amenities, and location of access point. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on November 28, 2016. a) ca RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: �. 1) Proposed Ordinance 2) Application and Support Material a 3) FLUE Consistency Review 4) Density Map »- 5) Legal Notifications c 6) Emails_Letters from Public a) ca 03 PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 12 of 13 December 5, 2016 Packet Pg. 52 I , . a PREPARED BY: : 9 A . , ,,,,,? , ,..„(,-( 440r,' 1 ( 1 /16 ERIC JOHN o,i 4, AICP, CFM. PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: /7---- ),---- ,--, r yr' - ' ;1 RAYMON 'V.`$ELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE a) ZONING DIVISION 0 a 0 ,7/2'/- (c-2i - !(,, MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION N t 0 0. w cc APPROVED BY: coco (-----, > 1� c J• MES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE a GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT a d '4.A... ,./z.„ E c/N �. r1Z.�S // aDAVID S. W KISODATE DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 13 of 13 I Packet Pg. 53 I 9.A.2 ORDINANCE NO. 17- 9 A AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A o RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD d TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST a OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN o - SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] N WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, Inc. representing developer, WCI Communities, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. as NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY 2 COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural r c (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a 9.75+/- acre project to be known as the Hamilton Place RPUD to allow up to 66 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units in accordance with the RPUD Documents, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "F" and incorporated herein by reference. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. [16-CPS-01571] 79 Hamilton Place RPUD PUDZ-PL20160001255 12/19/16 I of 2 Packet Pg. 54 9.A.2 9A SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2017. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA a ce By: By: v Deputy Clerk , Chair-0T 0 Approved as to form and legality: yr Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney 0 Attachments: Exhibit A—Permitted Uses o Exhibit B—Development Standards 2 Exhibit C—Master Plan Exhibit D— Legal Description Exhibit E—List of Deviations Exhibit F—Developer Commitments fC V fC [16-CPS-01571] 79 Hamilton Place RPUD PUDZ-PL20160001255 12/19/16 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 55 9. EXHIBIT A 9 A FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD Regulations for development of the Hamilton Place RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Document and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 66 residential dwelling units shall be permitted within the RPUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for a. other than the following: a) RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Dwelling Units — Multi-family, single family detached, single family attached and single family variable lot line. as 2. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or o the Hearing Examiner. -0 CD 0 B. Accessory Uses: 0. 1. Customary accessory uses associated with the principal uses permitted in this N RPUD, including but not limited to garages, carports, swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures and utility buildings. U ca 2. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. E 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 4. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner. AMENITY AREA A. Principal Uses: Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 1 of 8 12!15/2016 Packet Pg. 56 .. 9 ` .T21 1. Clubhouses with cafes, snack bars and similar uses intended to serve residents and guests. 2. Community administrative and recreation facilities. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis/pickle ball courts and basketball courts, parks, playgrounds, pedestrian/bikeways, and passive and/or active water features (private intended for use by the residents and their guests only). 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, landscape nurseries, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters to serve residents and their guests. 4. Tennis clubs, health spas, fitness facilities and other indoor recreational uses E (private, intended for use by the residents and their guests only). o. re d 8 B. Accessory Uses: a c 0 1. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. _ v 2. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses v and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner. c ai PRESERVE a 0 13 A. Allowable Uses: N 0 o. 2 1. Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve a` area to be retained. c.i 2. Mitigation for environmental permitting. d 3. Passive Recreation areas, as per LDC requirements. r 4. Water management as allowed by the LDC. co Zi w d E As V a Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20 60001255 Page 2 of B 12/15/2016 Packet Pg. 57 , , 9 A , , ,9.A.2 EXHIBIT B FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Hamilton Place RPUD Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. STANDARDS SINGLE-FAMILY VARIABLE LOT SINGLE FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY AMENITY DETACHED LINE FOR SINGLE ATTACHED CENTER FAMILY _ Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1 acre 10,000 SF m Minimum Lot Width *3 50 feet 40 feet 35 feet 100 feet N/A n' re Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet N/A v - ca Minimum Front Yard *1,*6 20 feet *2 20 feet*2 20 feet*2 20 feet N/A d Minimum Side Yard 5 feet 0-10 feet*4 0 or 5 feet 10 feet N/A c ci Minimum Rear Yard *6 E Principal 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet N/A = et Maximum Height Zoned(not to exceed 2 stories) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feetCNI Actual(not to exceed 2 stories) 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet a, c ca Minimum Distance Between 12 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A c Principal Structures *5 Floor Area Min. (S.F.) 1500 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF N/A m PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet N c Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet p e ACCESSORY STRUCTURES c Front *2 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet m Side 5 feet 0 feet 0 feet 10 feet 10 feet E s Minimum Rear Yard *6 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A 19 PUD Boundary 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Q Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet c a) Minimum Distance Between 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet E Structures ca Maximum Height Q Zoned(not to exceed 2 stories) 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Actual (not to exceed 2 stories) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type, and not the minimum lot area,shall define the development standards to bi applied by the Growth Management Department during an application for a building permit. For variable lot single family and single family attache( ' units, a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configurations, including building setbacks and building separations, shall be submitted to thi Growth Management Division with the application for the first building permit for the platted development tract. Verification of ingress/egress fo maintenance shall be provided for variable lot line single-family units. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. *1—Front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. B. If the parcel is served by a private road,setback is measured from the back of curb(if curbed)or edge of pavement(if not curbed). Hamilton Place RPUD,PL20160001255 Page 3 of 8 12/15/2016 Packet Pg. 58 9 A C. If the parcel has frontage on two sides, setback is measured from the side with the shortest frontage with the other frontage designated as a side yard. *2—Front entry garages must be a minimum of 20', and a minimum of 23' from a sidewalk. Porches, entry features and roofed courtyards may bE reduced to 15'. *3—Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20%for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. *4—The side setback may be variable between zero feet(0')to ten feet(10')as long as a 10-foot minimum separation between principal structures k maintained. If the variable lot line for single-family option is utilized,the owner shall provide with the building permit application,the setback of the11 principal structures on the abutting lots of all sides. *5—Building distance may be reduced at garages to a minimum of 0'where attached garages are provided and a 10' minimum building separation is maintained,if detached. *6— No front building setback is required from the 30' wide access easement, which extends along the southerly boundary of the Hamilton Plact PUD. However,a landscape buffer shall be required. Note:nothing in this RPUD Document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. O. Er- 0 O r E ca v 0) d V C C L 0 N O a O a N C d E .0 U C C) E C) Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 4 of 8 12/15/2016 Packet Pg. 59 09 '6d 10)13ed - _ ZONED:ARLINGTON LAKES PUD o g_'' m --....--z—AMC Biu USE: PRESERVE Q o o<<o< D z o o as a o �, U i� +i -H 1,-- r cex 0� o0 N0o)mm�a ,c,r-- U ,,,rr� ai vi o 0 0 up co a Z W O 0 I i F¢ i i > i i i i IZ i 3 i i i i i i 2 ON COa 4Z W W W U>V w 7Z a UW I i i i ) i i i i i w ii +a i i Z Z4 c mm , iPR'IERVE i Qaawal-O>- i i I I wzcWV)I- K Z} wZ C::,0wW Wa a w 0 Z uW a p LiW i i > i i i i i I I a � Qa ft¢ W in K n j j 0 >OI i i( (// (// (// (// (J ( II o F�aa3wm wCC uga f / r /r I 11-7 O � O_1 i ( TRGEfiil E�T.// m 22 a ymw 11 ••:.. I f/'_r/ /'f/li ////� I E--, WM I A s I W 2W O Wft II cc i IDuLL LLD I D I i so _. I I j �' i d I ✓ 0 0 ,_ W 0 0 I ' i ia W a m I 3 .rjN 0a. lij I I Na Qm0 _ ¢ O Y : o I 5 . I H H w __I c s o Oo � g I 00 Ya cn I � (D coQQw �`I zZ 3 a � I I r I O � O Wp c- Z II Om w LL W � � - _ a( _ I -t� W CO wW z I ¢ C COL A >IY IW) tf 1 j I a0 C: I � ® - W j j CD I� Ilzl < < 1. f •p a - ¢ z z 4. 0 I w w 30' I I < .. 0 I( 0 0 I ESMT _ I ( i � Fn. I (SEE NOTE#3) s 1 a) >z I < X I : i I� it,�e` FS= Cf I W II ¢ a -r N Z ( m o nN a w I 2 m o Illi 1 1-1-/Vs ~O 1 > } w '( C d o z Z 1 I CC Q ° w I�I�I 0 I ¢ -� ¢ w w0 Eis' i p O > W,co a I ( I U °- a a 2I I--- am via W m ai FN W 0 i 8 �' �wm 111 I I L I #1,::::,V5, ,,?,- '-: "z # I Z-agio z0u20mn _ . Z2F00 O W W O Z mYwaw Z O 0 Z w OV02i NOISONIAIl ¢w w 0 CO rt a c'''(9 0 W - -- u)aomo =Ooio (/)I F-1-0-,co FF-- Z•Vy•6 ZI V ! A 9-44f2 EXHIBIT D FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504066) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 528.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Ea- (PER (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504081) THE WEST 264 FEET AND THE EAST 264 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF cu THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA. a 0 (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504087) _ THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 792.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. N ANDco a THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 1056.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST O 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, d FLORIDA. Na • 2 L a C E t r.+ C d E V lC 4- Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 6 of 8 12/15/2016 Packet Pg. 61 9 A r 4 EXHIBIT E FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LIST OF DEVIATIONS No Deviations requested. a U a 0 E co rn v C C L 0 d co 0 2 L a C d E V 4- w w :.7 C C) E t r Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 7 of 8 12/15/2016 Packet Pg. 62 9A.2 EXHIBIT F 9 A FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval,the Managing Entity is WCI Communities, LLC, 24301 Walden Center Drive, Bonita Springs, FL 34135. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the a successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its r responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. `0 2. MISCELLANEOUS N a. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a 0 violation of state or federal law. ami w 0 a b. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the a development N w c d 3. ENVIRONMENTAL a. The RPUD shall be required to preserve 15% of native vegetation, 6.46± acres of native vegetation exists on-site requiring a minimum preservation of 0.97± acres (6.46 x .15 = 0.97) of native vegetation to be retained. E b. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic removal in a accordance with LDC Section 4.06.02 and LDC Section 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07. 4. WATER MANAGEMENT The project's stormwater management system shall be designed to discharge to the east into the Whippoorwill Flowway. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL201 60001255 Page 8 of 8 12/15/2016 Packet Pg. 63 9.A4 9 r s e-r AzilCo-vi-�.ty GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION CONSISTENCY REVIEW MEMORANDUM To: Eric Johnson, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section From: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section a Date: November 8, 2016 Subject: Future Land Use Element(FLUE) Consistency Review(2"d memo) PETITION NUMBER: PL-20160001255 — REV: 2 E PETITION NAME: Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). REQUEST: To rezone a ±9.75-acre property from the A, Agricultural zoning district to the Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development to allow residential development (up to 66 multi-family or single-family units) with associated amenities (recreational uses) and open space uses. LOCATION: The ±9.75-acre property is located approximately one-half mile south of Pine Ridge Road, on the east side of Livingston Road, south of the Brynwood Preserve and north of Positano Place at Naples (AKA Arlington Lakes) residential PUDs, in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map of _ the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The property is also located within a mile of the Pine Ridge Road —I-75 Mixed rJ Use Activity Center (MUAC #10). w Relative to this petition, the Urban Residential Subdistrict allows residential uses at a base density of 4 dwelling units u_ per acre (DU/A). Also, as explained below, this site is eligible for a 3 DU/A density bonus for mostly lying within the residential density band surrounding Activity Center#10, yielding a total eligible density of 7 DU/A. and is eligible for a 3 DU/A density bonus for lying within the residential density band surrounding Activity Center #10, yielding a total eligible density of 7 DU/A). 11 FLUE provisions for the Density Rating System state, "If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be m added. The density band around a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the t radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity r Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the gross Q acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map and shall not apply within the Estates Designation or for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area". More than 50%of the project is within the density band, so the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. This PUD provides for residential uses at a density of 6.77 DU/A, recreational uses and open space. The Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new developments to be compatible with the surrounding land area. [Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. However, staff notes that in reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/intensities on the subject site,the compatibility analysis is to be comprehensive and include a review of both the subject property and surrounding or nearby properties with regard to allowed use Packet Pg. 64 9 A , i9.A.4 intensities and densities,development standards(building heights,setbacks,landscape buffers,etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location, traffic generation/attraction, etc.] In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. a Policy 7.1: a The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of 0 the Land Development Code. [This site fronts Livingston Road,a minor arterial roadway. Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan, depicts a single, direct access to Livingston Road.] Policy 7.2: E The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby i collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan,depicts a private v hammer-head cul-de-sac street inside the project. All vehicular traffic accesses Livingston Road directly at a N single access point.] 3 Policy 7.3: m All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type.The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [The site abuts a road on one side — Livingston Road on the west. Properties located to the north and south are fully developed, with no y interconnection points proposed. A preserve area inside the Arlington Lakes PUD abuts the site along the east side, where no interconnection is proposed.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common u` open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [As to walkable communities, the PUD does not request Deviations from the Land Development Code (LDC). The project will be subject to LDC requirements for provision of sidewalks. c) Non-vehicular interconnections are not proposed with the abutting properties. Pedestrian/bike connections are provided to Livingston Road. As to a blend of densities and a range of housing prices and types,the PUD provides single-family detached & E attached, multi-family and single-family flexible lot line residences. Common open spaces and civic facilities are provided by more than 4.5 acres of open space including water management lakes, recreational/amenity areas and other open spaces.] Based upon the above analysis, the proposed PUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi,AICP, Director, Zoning Division David Weeks,AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section G: Comp\Consistency Reviews\2016 G:ICDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews120161PUDZIPUDZ-PL2016-1255 Hamilton Place R2 drft.docx. Packet Pg. 65 1 A 9.A.5 _.„4,, _ . ., � k,,,, 1 -- , :. _4.,,k t.„_,.._ t ,I . . ;_, Kraft LN . Zoning: Pt Related Group ' .. r PUD Density:6.99PUD. ` , , cC D PUD CPUD PUD �m i , - t � s 1 � D� Q$' Jet4. } , 7:3 liko �� -----------zoninq;;PUD f SII _ 1 RSF 5:.,. f x x-` B`ry'nvirood�Preserve m` .� Density 5 47 a CPUD 1 I SUBJECT PROPERTY. : , 1 HAMILTON PLACE RP 0 sab- 44 :, —- ', t..6,- . CS , /////"/: - / coO tI in l:/ /�flf L c e PositnoCIR h acco •• ilk, r ik -,,,,i i -a q a k : O N * L Kensington Park 1 ,i _ �� , Density:1 i .r 41 j 3 `�4141/01b..,, /...-4:._,/ -.,-: Raffina CT �t '� co , _ Z ing PUD -= o . CA on YADn ,ar -- 4 co CPUD & 1 Zoning: MPUD co d Q Biscayne CTo v o , Q { Silig +lilt }t ' �, Density:1 5 ac. t I l �. � Ba mora t ., � ` Aviano DR I : De 4.0 nsity t ...,, .,°' iii ` Carrington CIRC * c GROSS DENSITY UNITS PER ACRE (UPA) N FOR HAMILTON PLACE CPUD AND 0 150 300 600 900 Feet ti SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Packet Pg. 66 4 � A 9.A.6 t �{ JohnsonEric From: Steve <VirtualNeff@outlook.com> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 12:25 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: carriefilthaut@centurylink.net Subject: Hamilton Place 0. Dear Mr. Johnson, o: I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. x However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. N Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. o co Thank you for your consideration, Stephen & Maria Neff a 1681 Serrano Circle Naples, Florida d Ir W <O to 1 Packet Pg. 67 9.A.6 JohnsonEric 9 A From: Vigilante Family <familyvigilante@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 7:07 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: Carrie J. Filthaut Subject: Hamilton Place 0 Dear Mr.Johnson, is I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. I 0 It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. However,they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods,which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible,I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. c N Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding N Hamilton Place. aci a Kind regards, o rn Anthony&Kathleen Vigilante 1419 Serrano Circle Naples,FL 34105 239-567-9800 FamilyVigilante@gmail.com o N L J I co to ea Packet Pg. 68 9.A.6 9JohnsonEric A From: Debra Neal <debran42@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 8:21 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: carrie Filthaut Subject: Arlington Lakes a tx U Dear Mr. Johnson, R I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. R It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. ntHowever, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email N is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would G prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. a E Kind regards, Debra Neal m J E tD C U E L U R z a c d E U R a.+ a+ Q Packet Pg. 69 4. 9.A.6 JohnsonEric From: Jerry Ferguson <fergiforms@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:53 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: Carrie J. Filthaut (carriefilthaut@centurylink.net) Subject: Hamilton Place a a) Dear Mr.Johnson, ca I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the • building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. ca 2 Dear Mr.Johnson, • I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. N It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the ca building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. However,they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. N It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods,which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible,I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. U Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. a Kind regards, o However,they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. In r It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project JI be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods,which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible,I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. 'co- Please � E Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding W Hamilton Place. �O r c ai Kind regards, a) s Jerry Ferguson ai ca 1 Packet Pg. 70 ..�i9A6 -, .y JohnsonEric 19A From: Peter Garbarino <peter@simplejane.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:50 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: carriefilthaut@centurylink.net Subject: Hamilton Place development a Dear Mr.Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. co a It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. E However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. ca It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this rn project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding c Hamilton Place. N N Kind regards, 0 0 Peter Garbarino U) ca c, a E 0 L U) 0 z 0 J N E W cC C 0 E t, as r r Q a.i C d L V t4 r.+ +r Q 1 Packet Pg. 71 , .,-7--.....- i 9 R JohnsonEric From: Rumley, Jeffrey <JRumley@bcbsm.com> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 9:45 AM To: JohnsonEric Cc: paulg@sandcastlecm.com Subject: Hamilton Place RPUD-Dec 15th Hearing 0 m Good Morning Mr. Johnson: a CCw u I am presently a Michigan resident with a seasonal home at Brynwood Preserve anticipating full time Florida residency. I a am unable to be present at the scheduled Dec 15th hearing but wanted to take the opportunity to express a concern I c have. E co One of the primary reasons I purchased a home in Brynwood was because of the privacy it afforded from adjacent properties. The preserve, of course, presents one insulator and there appears to be a sufficient barrier between our association's homes on the north side from the commercial properties at Pine Ridge and Livingston Rd. My concern is N the sufficiency of the proposed barrier between Hamilton Place and the south side of Brynwood Preserve Association. co The site plan provided by the builder makes reference to a "Type B" barrier. I do not know what that is and how it is o distinguished from the Type A or D barriers proposed on the road side of Hamilton or the south side of Hamilton. In any N event, a substantial part of the value proposition of Brynwood is the interior lakes and surrounding natural habitat. u a, 0 I do not object to the construction of tasteful residential units on adjoining property. What I do want to see though is an o appropriately deep boundary that preserves as much as possible the natural surroundings. This is not only a value to the 2 residents of Brynwood but also a value that should be recognized by putative purchasers of Hamilton Place residences. 0 7o Thank you for the opportunity to comment. a E 2 Jeffrey Rumley 12858 Brynwood Preserve Lane L w m J col The information contained in this communication is highly confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom this communication is directed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby w notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. Please notify the t.o sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended receipt and delete the original message without Z making any copies. E o Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan are nonprofit corporations and Q independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. r c d E o ca a 1 Packet Pg. 72 9A JohnsonEric From: Nicola Vincent <VincentN@rollsecure.com> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 8:35 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: Please DO NOT APPROVE Hamilton Place RPUD 0 n a ce d Mr Johnson, CO E: My name is Nicola Vincent and I reside at 12873 Brynwood Way in Naples. I am extremely opposed to Hamilton g Place RPUD. I purchased my home in Brynwood Preserve almost 7 years ago because I found it to be a quiet little neighborhood. My home is at the end of the street and with only one neighbor it offers a lot of privacy which added to = my decision.That is unless they build this monstrosity of a neighborhood next door to me,then I can say"bye bye"to .. my private, quiet, peaceful home. Not only will I have new homes next door in what I considered a preserve (hence the 71) name Brynwood Preserve) but they will stare directly into my home. Not only will I have to put up with annoying U. construction all day for the foreseeable future, once done I will go from having one neighbor to several overnight. It will a N. also drastically decrease my property value. c N All the above is just the affect to me personally. Building this new neighborhood will also have a catastrophic N effect to traffic. If you come from Pine Ridge heading into Brynwood Preserve, we have to make a U-turn at Kensington/ Postitano to get home.The new neighborhood would be the same. Please, go check this out at 5pm any weekday, it's a o nightmare.Traffic is already backed up something awful, I honestly don't know how there are no accidents most days, o let's not add a whole neighborhood of extra drivers to that mess. ca While I will try my best to attend the meeting on December 15th, I work so I am not sure I will be able to. Please, Please DO NOT approve this new development. Leave some trees, some preserve, some nature in this town! z a E Thank you for your time, e L Nicola Vincent 12873 Brynwood Way Naples, FL 34109 as E Lu Nicola Vincent co 239-594- 1616 E ea a w E u 2 w a 1 Packet Pg. 73 t •ri'°' 6 t. r r ) Fa' m itc0j5ECURE Sfilinniv ct. cc sERVP16 SWIL$1NGE --,litc w 199$ u co a.- s.) , E ta .4. a) cv ct cst CNI (NI c.) w CI 1:3 u) co c.) a. E e ... u) L. w CD —I 01 .— CI E w co Z w E ..c u gs = < 4E; w E ..c c.) co ..+1.. 2 Packet Pg. 74 A 9.A.6 JohnsonEric From: Frank Philipone <frankphilipone@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 5:55 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: Fwd: ***Update to Hamilton Place Information*** o.Hamilton Place ce a: Dear Mr. Johnson, a 0 I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. co It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed = to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. rn However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. co It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that c this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to N 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our N development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. ca ca Kind regards a E 0 L W d -j N I CD E W C w E .0 V <d z Q C d E L C1 CD Q 1 Packet Pg. 75 9.A.6 91\ JohnsonEric From: Frank Campoamor <frankcampoamor@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 5:55 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: Opposition Letter- Hamilton Place RPUD a Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a property owner in the adjoining neighborhood, Brynwood Preserve (12856 Brynwood Way, Naples, FL 34105). I live there year-round and work full-time in Naples. I am very concerned about the effects that Hamilton Place will have on the existing, adjoining neighborhoods and traffic on Livingston Road. cc 1. It is already extremely difficult and dangerous to access Brynwood Preserve heading south on Livingston Road and (.1 having to do a U-turn at the median cut through where Positano Place and the back entrance to Kensington are located. N It is already a mess, and I have seen road rage incidents occur with the existing 3 neighborhoods trying to use that c.) a) median cut through. Adding a fourth neighborhood with 66 units, which could realistically mean another 100 cars, would be dangerous to the existing residents and unfair. o ea 2.Then accessing Brynwood Preserve heading north on Livingston Road will be equally dangerous because the ingress and egress for Hamilton Place will be right next to where the turn in is for Brynwood Preserve.That is accidents waiting f] to happen. It is my understanding that entrances to neighborhoods need to be 660 feet apart.The proposed entrance for Hamilton Place will violate that ordinance because its entrance is less than 660 feet from the entrances of both o IBrynwood Preserve and Positano Place. 3.The proposed density is too great.The land under consideration is just too tight to put the density in there being I proposed when you already have Brynwood Preserve to the north and Positano Place to the south. 4.The proposed vegetation barrier between Brynwood Preserve and Hamilton Place is wholly inadequate. Not only will it not act as a sufficient sound barrier, the proposed height of the structures will leave no privacy to our community and co their community. Further,there should be more of a buffer distance between the homes in Brynwood Preserve and the m residences proposed for Hamilton place. ca In my opinion,the vacant land between Brynwood Preserve and Positano Place is unfit for the development being proposed. It just does not make sense,will put the residents of the adjoining neighborhoods and general public using Livingston Road in danger from a traffic standpoint, and does not provide adequate barriers between the adjoining a) neighborhoods. Thank you for your consideration. Frank Campoamor Owner in Brynwood Preserve 1 Packet Pg. 76 9A9.A.6 JohnsonEric From: Marcia Azar <marciaazar@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 10:44 AM To: JohnsonEric Cc: Carrie Subject: Hamilton Place a Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. o It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email N is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining d neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. ° Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it '`' becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. E Kind regards, i Marcia Azar co) E Sent from my iPhone w co CD a) w Packet Pg. 77 1 9A6, gA . JohnsonEric From: Joan Kellner <jk349@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 7:12 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: PUDZ-PL20160001255 - Submission against Hamilton Place Zoning change Attachments: Letter to CCPC regarding Hamilton Place zoning request 12-04-2016.docx a Mr.Johnson; m I am respectfully submitting this email communication as I will be unable to attend the hearing scheduled for Thursday, o, December 15, 2016 at 9:00am.This communication was transmitted on December 4, 2016—in excess of the stated 7 days required as per the notice I received. I ask that a receipt be forwarded to me (email is acceptable),that this communication has been received in a timely manner and will be submitted into the final package of documents to be considered by the CCPC concerning this zoning v request. co Thank you Joan Kellner 12860 Brynwood Way w Naples FL 34105 0 Jk349@comcast.net V a E 0 G1 -J N I E (13 W t0 C d E .0 V r-% C d E t v co Q 1 Packet Pg. 78 9A6 . 9A DATE: December 4, 2016 TO: Collier County Planning Commission FROM: Joan I. Kellner RE: Zoning Proposal PUDZ-PL20160001255—Hamilton Place a In accordance with the notification I received dated November 23, 2016; pertaining to the public hearing ca scheduled for 9:00am, Thursday, December 15, 2016 for consideration of: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulation for the unincorporated area of Collier = County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the rn zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) N zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the ., project known as Hamilton Place RPUD to allow development of up to 66 single family cD 0 and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.75+/-acres, and by providing an effective date. {PUDZ- 0 PL20160001255}. U) Please find the following: I am a permanent,full-time resident of Brynwood Preserve, the development located just north of the 25 subject property. My property is located approximately at the midpoint along the southern border of a my association and would be directly affected by the proposed zoning change and subsequent development. I have attended the community information meeting which was held on September 27, 2016. In essence, this meeting did not provide much information as at the time no final plans had been set.There I were also concerned residents from Andalucia and Positano Place,two other communities which share borders with the subject property. £ At the time of this meeting, the developers were not able to provide specifics on the allocation of co building types (Single detached, Single attached, Multi-Family) or the projected sales price ranges of the proposed units. Even the size of the units was not available for discussion.This concerns me as a neighbor to the proposed development since the type and size of unit will dictate market pricing and in turn could have an adverse effect on the value of my property. For example, Brynwood preserve has 85, single detached homes, both one and two story with floor plans between ^'1,900-^2,300sf. Houses in the association are currently begin marketed and sold from the mid-$400M to low$500M. If the new units being built adjacent to our property are less than 1,500sf, and are considered more c) condo/apartment styled —the overall market value per unit will be substantially less and could adversely ca affect the market prices in the immediate geographic area. The contiguous developments: Brynwood, Andalucia, Positano; were constructed between 2003 and 2016 and have residential density ratios of under 6:1. The proposed development is in excess of this ratio, and although the County regulations allow up to 7:1, I feel that the final density should not exceed the lowest of the contiguous parcels. Packet Pg. 79 ls JA\ 9.A 9 Why you may ask? The proposed building parcel is much smaller than its neighbors—with a 66 proposed units (in combination of single detached, single attached, and multifamily units) on 9.75 acres with two proposed water retention areas, a community area with a common area pool, tennis/pickle ball and basketball court areas, a community building and related roadways. By comparison: Brynwood contains 29 acres and has 85 single family homes. Each home is approximately 1/6 (.16) of an acre. There are essentially three floor plans of one or two story construction. The remainingo. space is occupied by retention lakes, roadway, preserve area and some common area walk/jogging paths along the western edge. Andalucia has 78 acres with 167 single family homes. Other land use is in retention lakes, o preserve areas, roadways and a community center with a pool, pay area and common building amenities. Positano Place is a condominium association with 330 units in 15 building (22 units per building) with three story construction. The property is divided into four smaller neighborhood associations and each pay toward common amenities such as the community center, a pool and roadways. With the exception of Positano, none of the closest developments to any of these properties (Aviano, Kensington, Stratford Place etc.) do not exceed two stories. And should not—if only for aesthetic N purposes. There are no other three-story buildings in the immediate area other than commercial. Also—in a quick aerial view of the surrounding developments—there are significant areas of vacant/non-developed land which surround each development—in the form of preserves, . environmentally protected areas and outright vacant land. There is little to no "line of sight" contact between developments. Permitting this construction would not only increase the density of the area, but contaminate the views of the owners of units along the borders of this property which were a major a E deciding factor in the purchase of these units and making them more desirable within the communities 2 as reflected by sales and purchase prices. Developing this property will have an adverse effect on the n market value of the closest units of the adjacent communities and a decreased enjoyment of these properties by the owners. J N I Not only visual, but auditory issues will result. As I mentioned earlier, I am located on the southern side of Brynwood Preserve—approximately halfway along the length of the subject property. At this time with the full width of the property vacant and heavily vegetated, sounds from Positano Place (located to the south of the subject property) pervade to our side of the association. Noises include car traffic, car alarms and closing doors, loud talking from the residents at Positano. Most recently the cries of victory °' from Chicago fans at the end of the 7th game of the World Series this past November could be heard. I .c cannot imagine the additional noise that will be generated from 66 units between us (Positano and Brynwood) in the form of human interaction, general building noise (air handler/compressor units, pool pumps, garage doors, entry doors), entertainment areas (common pool, tennis or basketball courts) and general traffic. I cannot imagine that the proposed vegetation and/or water management areas that are proposed will be able to alleviate the noise contamination when a fully wooded/vegetative area cannot. I feel that I can categorically state that the proposed vegetation; 15' of Type B along the northern border and 10' of Type A along the southern border will not be a sufficient for either bordering neighborhood. If this plan were to be approved I would argue for the need of a significant wall barrier in addition to heavier vegetation planting to attempt to muffle the increase in noise. Packet Pg. 80 9.A.6 9 A The proposed development also allows for a water management area along the property line it shares with Brynwood. At the meeting previously noted, participants were informed that this will be @40' in width (from north to south) and extend along the residential construction, approximately 800'- 850'along the shared property line. Currently there is no formal run-off for water to this area which will require the construction of a "canal" or other such structure to contain excess rainwater and run-off from the adjacent parcels (I'm assuming that this will include water flow from individual building gutters, possible pool overflows, drainage from the interior roadway etc.). I'm concerned about the capacity of the basin, purge capability, and water flow/stagnation issues that could result in overflow to a adjacent areas or mosquito or other insect larvae production so close to my home. At this time we do not have a problem with drainage on this side of the property or adverse insect population effects but -a any significant change in the ecosystem or topography of the immediate area could have negative a effects. E Additionally, noise is a concern for us along our roadway and as sound carries quickly without reduced cti decibel levels across a liquid surface more readily than through a heavily vegetated area—all sounds generated from Hamilton Place will be in excess of the levels currently heard from Positano. Residents at Andalucia had voiced their concern about the water management area at the rear of the project—their development has already experienced problems with drainage in the preserve areas and fear that co additional water containment structures nearby will exacerbate their current issue. The proposed construction includes moving the current driveway access from the southwest to the northwest corner of the property—nearly in alignment with the "slip" lane which originates just north of our property line on Livingston Road for access to Brynwood's entry. Not only do I believe that the proximity of these two driveway features will inherently create a heightened accident zone for residents ea of Brynwood and Hamilton Place, but that Positano will also be adversely affected in their ability to access Livingston Road easily. From personal experience, I normally access Brynwood by travelling southward on Livingston and make the U-turn where Positano and Kensington entrances are across a. from one another. The knowledge of right-of-way eludes most drivers in the best of circumstances but adding another property access into the immediate area will only increase the likelihood of collision from entrance and egress of these properties as well as drivers travelling on Livingston Road itself. Additionally, the location of the proposed entrance will cause an increase of vehicles taking this U-turn J to access the subject property. The current slip/turn lane located southbound on Livingston will most w� likely need to be elongated to support additional vehicles waiting to make this turn. Also, we were informed at the information meeting that there is a County requirement of 660ft between driveways/entrances.The location of the Hamilton Place PUD entrance will be less than 660ft to from both Positano Place and Brynwood Preserve roadways, requiring TWO variances solely for driveway placement. Obviously this narrow parcel is not conducive for a high-access development. c) As you are aware, WCI Communities Inc. is the current developer of record and has a relatively strong record for building quality construction in this market and others. However, in September 2016, WCI entered into a merger agreement with Lennar Homes Inc. Lennar will be the lead company and WCI will d become essentially a branding name with no management or decision-making authority. Lennar, unlike WCI, does not have the same name in the construction business and instead has a high incidence of consumer complaints with construction quality and warranties/guaranties—all of which can be viewed via multiple BBB listings—complaints are organized by geographic area on the website. Furthermore, in on November 30, 2016, a WCI shareholder has filed suit against the proposed merger—with further details to be found via any internet search engine. Packet Pg. 81 9.A.6 9A In summary, I am submitting my concerns,which affect numerous residents in three neighborhoods contiguous with the proposed development. I hope that these arguments will bear consideration from the Board who are also residents of Naples and purchased their homes with consideration of proximity of other developments and the related auditory and visual benefits as well as ease of access from major local roadways. Furthermore,while I understand that development is inevitable, I do not believe that a higher density project should be approved in the midst of three completed projects that are lower in density. The a. developer has submitted this multi-story, high density plan as it is likely not financially feasible for them develop it similarly to the two adjacent parcels of Brynwood or Andalucia which are of lower density and do not contain multi-family units. If it is developed along the scope of Positano—the property values for the units of Brynwood that face this project will decline as it will not be favorably viewed by future owners. .— Respectfully I submit my concerns and views of this project to the Board. I ask that if approval is granted, that additional concerns and consideration for the following will be addressed: • A solid wall barrier along the shared property lines, or • Extended vegetation coverage in excess of the proposed plan. • A two-story limit on all construction heights. N • A density level not to exceed the existing surrounding parcels of less than 6:1. • An alternate plan for entrance/egress to the property. • Extensive review of water retention areas and proposed management as well as geologic and c environmental impact on adjacent parcels. Thank you for your time and attention. a Sincerely; 0 Joan I Kellner 12860 Brynwood Way -i Naples FL 34105 E w co c E ca 4 c w E C) CO Q Packet Pg. 82 9A JohnsonEric From: djosephmail@gmail.com on behalf of David Joseph <david@naplesluxurygroup.com> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 10:04 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: Hamilton Place a Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed tv to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. .. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. N It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that a this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to c 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our N N development. o a) Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards _ ITa a Please click HERE to visit the Andalucia Homeowners Association web site. d d -J N E W t0 C d E c) ca Q C d s �a y Q 1 Packet Pg. 83 9A6 AJohnsonEric From: Julie <jvadas35@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 3:46 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: Carrie Filthaut Subject: Hamilton Place a d Dear Mr. Johnson, 0 I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. ca It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed = to limiting the building height to 3 stories or less based on their approved height of 35'. a) However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. co It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that c this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to N 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our N development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards, Julie Mehler 1469 Serrano Circle p. 2 Please click HERE to visit the Andalucia Homeowners Association web site. as co c.3 td c9 1 Packet Pg. 84 9A9.A.6 JohnsonEric From: Vicki Mach <william.mach@frontier.com> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2016 12:19 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: Carrie Filthaut Subject: Hamilton Place Dear Mr. Johnson, a We are homeowners in Andalucia. We are one of the 7 homes most affected, as our home is directly behind the proposed _� Hamilton Place Development. We bought our lot specifically because of the privacy it afforded, due to being a preserve lot. We a have concerns of privacy and noise due to the current proposal. We were not able to attend the October informational meeting, but we did contact Sharon Upenhour at Grady Minor. It is our understanding, after talking with her, that WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their z approved height of 35'.and that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. rn It is our understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request tNi that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit G. it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, we would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. N N Please confirm that you have received this email and keep us apprised of any additional information as it becomes available v regarding Hamilton Place. ca Regards, Bill and Vicki Mach N I sr co C d cv 1 Packet Pg. 85 9,A.6 9 JohnsonEric From: Ana Tereza <ana_avellar@hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2016 1:00 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: Request a d Dear Mr. Johnson, co F. I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. c It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. ca However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer AoV that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. N Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it G becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. 0 Kind regards, Ana Munro E 0 L da d d J Cl) E 1 W co C d E v 4- .r w 4- C, E V Packet Pg. 86 , 9 A i JohnsonEric From: Sandra Raseta <sraseta@aol.com> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2016 11:51 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: Carrie J. Filthaut Subject: HamiltonPlace Mr. Johnson, My husband, George Raseta, and I, Sandra Raseta, moved into our new home here at 1478 Serrano Circle in °i (13 Andalucia on 12/20/2011. We are full-time residents and have been very happy living here these past 5 years. If you allow the construction of 6.6 units per acre in Hamilton Place, our home will not be as ideal as it has been. S- I'm sure it is not your intention to make people unhappy to be living in Naples. The best solution would be to locate Hamilton Place elsewhere, somewhere with more room. But if this is "impossible" please try to limit the impact on our environment by reducing the number of units to be squeezed into that slender parcel of land. Thank you. Sandra and George Raseta 0 Sent from my iPad N a, w 0 ca ca a E 0 L W C, r/ F+ C) J I y E W tD C C) E .0 V co r r C E w Packet Pg. 87 9A6 9 JohnsonEric From: Budimir Zvolanek <budajz68@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2016 11:27 AM To: JohnsonEric Subject: Hamilton Place development 0 Mr. Johnson, m a cc I am a homeowner in Andalucia and am writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place development. ey CI It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October 2016 and at that meeting WCI a agreed to limit the building height to 3 stories or less based on their approved height of 35'. c However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. E ca I I understand that density is based on neighboring developments. I am thus requesting that Hamilton Place be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match cn Arlington Lakes. If possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our Andalucia development where I live. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding the Hamilton Place. N N N Best regards, m 0 Budimir (Bud) Zvolanek c Homeowner a 1340 Andalucia Way u Naples, FL 34105 2 a E 0 N L yw d J I N E W co C d E t ca Qr.+ G d E t 0 ca Q 1 Packet Pg. 88 9 A 9.A.6 JohnsonEric From: Carrie J. Filthaut <cjfilthaut@napleslaw.com> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 4:45 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: RE: Hamilton Place RPUD If it helps, I will be happy to collect owner responses via email that back the Association request. a ce Carrie J. Filthaut Real Estate Paralegal CHEFFYPASSIIJ©MO Cheffy Passidomo, P.A. 57TOMNEZS 17 !AVC 821 5th Avenue South Naples, FL 34102 (239) 436-1519 direct (239) 261-9300 telephone (239) 261-9782 facsimile cjfilthautc napleslaw.com www.napleslaw.com This e-mail,along with any files transmitted with it,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain information that is confidential or privileged.If this e-mail is not addressed to you(or if you have any reason to believe that it is not intended for you),please notify the sender by return e-mail or by telephoning us(collect)at 239-261-9300 0 and delete this message immediately from your computer.Any unauthorized review,use,retention,disclosure,dissemination,forwarding,printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the law firm. to V a E From:JohnsonEric [mailto:EricJohnson@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 4:42 PM To: Carrie J. Filthaut<cjfilthaut@napleslaw.com> Subject: RE: Hamilton Place RPUD I to Thank you for your email and comments. I will be sure to include it in the packets that will be reviewed by the w decision makers. co Respectfully, s Eric L. Johnson, AICP, CFM, LEED Green Associate Principal Planner a) From: Carrie J. Filthaut [mailto:cjfilthaut@napleslaw.com] co Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 3:31 PM To:Johnson Eric<EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Cc: Carrie Filthaut<carriefilthaut@centurylink.net> Subject: Hamilton Place RPUD Hi Eric- 1 Packet Pg. 89 • 9 A 9.a9 I am the President of Andalucia Homeowners' Association and I was at the informational meeting you attended last week regarding Hamilton Place. During that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. a cc I look forward to your response. m as Kind regards, Carrie J. Filthaut Real Estate Paralegal rn CHFFFYPASSiI1X)MO Cheffy Passidomo, P.A. s,.rtAStI.AV 821 5th Avenue South N Naples, FL 34102 (239) 436-1519 direct (239) 261-9300 telephone (239) 261-9782 facsimile a) cifilthaut@napleslaw.com www.napleslaw.com rn ca This e-mail,along with any files transmitted with it,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain information that is confidential or privileged.If this e-mail is 141 not addressed to you(or if you have any reason to believe that it is not intended for you),please notify the sender by return e-mail or by telephoning us(collect)at 239-261-9300 - and delete this message immediately from your computer.Any unauthorized review,use,retention,disclosure,dissemination,forwarding,printing or copying of this e-mail is 0- strictly prohibited.Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the law firm. O w d i d -J I Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request.do not send W electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. co a1 ns 2 Packet Pg. 90 9.A.6 9A JohnsonEric From: Carrie J. Filthaut <cjfilthaut@napleslaw.com> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 3:31 PM To: JohnsonEric Cc: Carrie Filthaut Subject: Hamilton Place RPUD Hi Eric— n' I am the President of Andalucia Homeowners' Association and I was at the informational meeting you attended last week regarding Hamilton Place. During that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. co However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. rn N It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, o N which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. N N I look forward to your response. ca Kind regards, U Carrie J. Filthaut Real Estate Paralegal E CHEFFY PASSIDOMO Cheffy Passidomo, P.A. AITOAtFYi tAW 821 5th Avenue South L Naples, FL 34102 w J (239) 436-1519 direct wI (239) 261-9300 telephone (239) 261-9782 facsimile cjfilthautPnapleslaw.com www.naeleslaw.com co. a) This e-mail,along with any files transmitted with it,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain information that is confidential or privileged.If this e-mail is L not addressed to you(or if you have any reason to believe that it is not intended for you),please notify the sender by return e-mail or by telephoning us(collect)at 239-261-9300 V and delete this message immediately from your computer.Any unauthorized review,use,retention,disclosure,dissemination,forwarding,printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the law firm. w C a) E V w Q 1 Packet Pg. 91 (Qnda eoew uo;flweH : g6PZ) iapodab 4inoo woa;Tswa;l - L;uewyoe y :;uewyoe4r9f y�- w ii * , ,fit ,, - Ali a. • U * ; CO000 I -.,. tail', 7- :„'-_-'` - ... . , L.... .#.--ixer4,,,,,. 4 , ,. .,- ... ,. Tr. 32 +. ° w • . .,,—, . .- .1,......_.. , .., ... . . FF,, ..,:. , /,... .1 tr., _ _..._. Baa ♦ Woo ' ittrs. oa 4r l• tillf- 6. ;,...e....re; a _,_..._ .� _. _ e6 ti La Q W 6 ;ii p-; r.. a "Lt U �#Y " - 3 w o 5i , w fy d q '` It- 4tir : �t; tF�wG?t? yI ' ' . ' 4 . ' '- 17.... ...,.. ., ....„ ..- .,.r . .. :. ', d . 7. . , - sV f !' L) i- : mar , � ,+ vomit .....- ra Irli' I ......'' 1 ,...: ,,,i. _2. . . . i ..1 1. ...., .,10-.4, _ - t 1 . . 1. -, - -, , .;.,;.,,,,_ L VINGSTON ROAD _ y. i 7.:' p - y, r %' ., IIS jjj/// /-- '^` Y ', f fir , Vit. ' N . 41 : . :,:;:: ,.. '',1*.; \tt*.i:: 14, ' 43 ,,,,•terr"' 1 4et 44'.--L: Y'''4' 414'1' 114'..... ."*N.N.4ks,: - i . , a^ rte- '.,4 -. l .l ,.�^� ._. ,..y;ct" '- (afld2l a�e�d uo;�iweH ti6P ) iapoda�{ �no� woa} swa;l - L;uawyoe;;y :;uew43e;4y i ' a t..-Iii age c i,.„.- ,.; a • J Y .. ..,... .... ' -. _'-" ,,.„ . ., . , ......._ .. , , _.. ......_ .� a� H ,«• .... a{ __,, i,--,„ „:-.,:::: . „,,,,, -,-: , ..4 ) •' .- - ' -'. --- --' ,. A. a k Li; 1 ;�� O w '-,..----''.,k \ '' .1-',;'-',!!..---'Vl° - :''..T.1:-• -.4 _ , o "in _„\-.. ' r 1'.:4,..'r.`,r.;:.., ... ,4. 4. t...,., '4' ' ' ': 4;lt...4110g1 1' * ' ' . .w 's- -- 11 k > _, _ c . oil itsi .. r _ _1t/sI emrs- i ill11$1 II )11 } _ t;1 i/ire/ ,//,/fr I 1 . NIll • - .:-:;;",-"'''; - '*-— '''''''''''' ,u 1 a _ ;, ' 1!-:.)' ::! . ir ...,,rd:„.....„, . iiiil .,.P ,, ,..- .11---T4,''',,,?A'4'- t,'?-i -141t•'-''' ' Cr 9�, � u 's ....: ,....,, , . 4 ZYi 6 ..,,,.. $� III It � ' tr a a t3 II• I 11111 w + f'b (andm opeld u0;1!weig : 11'61'..Z) JaliodeJno3 woij swell - L luewgoe4v :luew1.13ellV vr 1.! • C) a. gi. ID , - 1 —'''''' .1••• ID i . .. "d P4 14::C (Ts (1) cy% _-- , ..,...:-,i,,,-,,----,.-:;,,„,,-,,,„,....,......,.,,..,_,.-,1_,-,,-,,.„-,.-,,.,..,:...,,.-.-:.,-:,.:.,_._,.. ,. ,.-,,.,.,..,.,,,-, ‘-,,,,,t-:-,,,,.,.:....--,-,-..,:;:,_7,_,i,..,-„,-.z..,..,,,',,:„,k..,..,.-,.,,.-.,,_,,,,--„_-•-- I,..4... . .,xI4 ,..., 0 • I . * •C ulilimai , . , • , ,LL; -,,....,•&;-...-- , _ „„ 1 • .-i, .1. , . , • , ., •- ,-!-;,,' ..1,' -;,..-:•-%,- t4"-***••4".t.* ,d!' ,- • -•••• •• 1`.. *-:',*.15, •• esP l'" , : ...-4.*"`,:' ' \ .' •• •• 1•'''. .4' r'''',/,',',:e** • ' ' ---4 ';'• . . , •„ -, i • • .. , - - ' ,..,, : ''',;•*,•';:i5.,74,,,.,,,:•.,,, ',..f' , 'I- • 1 't''' .....5, 61 , j,..,"•,. -.4..IIkN - a * 11184FINIII =ND' i. T • ;-7,1.7.,- „f 1,:,'-*,,r • - 'lc -- -';,-,,;..1.:„..-;';`,73.•',;;;; • .1,•-,,,,, .. •-,--.),,,v,,,,4 . 1 1 t 41 . . r \ -„ ' -,,-L--„..-: ------ Vir-t.- 1, r 1111r- . •- , ,. ..... , (and2i eoe�d uo}�weH : b6tiZ) aa}aodab }�no9 WOJ� swell 1..1.r. }uawyoe}}y }u : ewyoe}}y �, a. . . ', 1-4 -:-.F.,..::---;f:,, ,:z.;::-,,, ,.';'-'-';'.,4,.-!. 1,t"' i11 i 4^ l " ate♦ a. I. ' +a 'i E` moi,. C. _ } gg. firs f ''I* 1` S .T.e ' ' *v ��i`rZ _ { #` sh `rot'+, :"-3*'jy � �' :' • ,ate �F ¢ 4' ` „... � i , ..::...:-. , �:: -tcam - * . � + : # i �llt# + 1' n 71:` ' sir -r *A. �.. • ' fil PwPs�e �'^3- %' YV I --.'rat S • ma ZY ,� `•{ ,{:f j 4 ` p §' .am ��'s. Iry 3 pjt'. ' '; .. t -4:._ u _ Rhe f,� :;_ ' . em i _ % * vAAA- _*.• • ns - vel '' -� ii #j '-._ - . .. r� - II( Pe to I t4-, Al De 1 .. ,-.13, 1" r V( Z -- \/ ----- A „p ri- s Ei c4) 14-t> el 6-c, Lii3) --------... /.. A A F. ( Pc P = (., a) Tr (NI ) , • , . t; K —3 t 0 ,. . < ---4---- re K. < • ce A ( K ) K ) o > pp 191 k(c_ g ) . ) PP ( pf ic.). T , r-. Z E 0 co .1-.0 A g = c.) cr, A --., , --'--,---" 7-e <,...,... $ $ op 'be PP Packet Pg. 96 1 . , il CO .17"Artnill.! NM - - Hamilton Place PUD 9 A , Adjacent Development Densities PUD Acres Dwelling Units Density Arlington Lakes 98.36 590 6 Brynwood Preserve 29.26 170 5.47 Kensington Park 370 570 1.54 0 m a Related Group 39.5 276 6.99 a. rx 1% Whippoorwill Lakes 76.85 518 6.74 tz Whippoorwill Pines 29.54 180 6 c P. Whippoorwill Woods 83.92 462 5.51 cxi • Summerwind 29.6 368 12.43 v a Cypress Glenn 29.70 208 7 N Manchester Square 36.90 148 4 43 t Temple Citrus Grove 132.68 512 3.86 a 0 Oak Grove 131.30 525 • 4 t z Vineyards 1,930.16 5,608 3.02 v Citrus Gardens 98.6 396 4.01 c Wilshire Lakes 246.41 552 2.24 N d Balmoral 58.95 236 4 ti Livingston Village 149 590 3.9 2 g ca r a m g V 03 Z a December 13,2016 Page 1 of 1 im t1i'iidN\Iirior r Ln2iur.cr.•1.:114{surwiear,.•i',ann,r,*Laub.;ape Urj;i1,1 P, Packet Pg. 97 1 Lu luta. in Vy w COi • 18A Monday,November 28,2016 Naples Daily News 9 A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,December 15th,2016,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL.,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE a COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OFre COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING c DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING 2 UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] ev 0 Pine Ridge RD Ce 0 c o I-75 E a. o , Green BLVD E c PROJECT S +% LOCATION rn J C All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,December 15th, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252- 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman November 28.2016 ND-1368601 IPacket Pg. 98 (and2l aOeld uo;IlwBH : 17617Z) aaiioda21 inoo wail swell - L luawy3epd :;uawyoefy •c W os z _ A. zw 44 a) 0 � cow Q 0 'L s �� . Z Z W = Zla ., s. ( 00 = LU U F- a w W `+i \ -4 z w = z 00 = _ w >- O = W w t` -� -J z W Lr- , ., w = F- 0 J „z ¢ ct Z ww _.j -',i Ce I-- QEl IY C= H ¢ i=- V '"� °�J .� § J z a0. Q f-- Cl) Cl) CD w I- \� .- _ = Z Ww J A, U) W Cr) wQ Z rk- { co CO Z > _Z --a 0 � 0 X00 W r , m � W ww = -- � w m0 O z Q ( w Q e Ov) O = O I-- O O YCCOO J :s J W c Cf) Ct L: = CnZ d W -J : ¢ p < wY W � -� w 11.1 v) m I ¢ � O Qm .J - E D Fc Q � rn 4. fly = � Z ~ d W 0. �A C.) cc w -§ Q 4 Q E- W= Wm I C� F- W Z � z D � � � J (n W O LU O �_ � � Q � � Q a moo Q 0 - _ } Eh Q � S 0 NUS F- ...7j (7) LL r ccmmQ 0 - W o00Z me C) 0 i- o 0 W = d N � o c� � �' V CN ct i amu- - J 4 'woOz � O m5 Z Lu I.11 U = QomJ QZO p � -I Wa 0 a ; in Q ,- ,,- W zoom z ; w I. .F `o C) I-- CO O 'o q = C) V pp w E _ wUy - O � 0 I— '"� 7 74 c, E.7. LU _ � v) I- m z � � W W O �' _ zwo O J11W I-U c� LU OQw 0 w CO op ~ mom - z0Q � = m uj a �' = W 2LUO � � ai 0 ¢w0 Owp ~ � � < o � Q = Dz Z -0 >- � = w � 0 W 0 ZI- aZ Q -2 Z o � c Z OWY Z _` Qom c o0 EY u- , Cn z F- n- 0 Q-- z cc —0 op 111 W C- O LU u- w � ¢ M wF_ `S �� W w ¢ cv `tom M p0 I= ,,LC..)) IY 00 W 1 `= F- LU 0Q O v oZ Iw- W W m Z o u� N O 0 F- Uj n- `� J CD Z No E- I- rjj-0_ W 0 T zZ W Cf' z U ■ Z0 1_ O~ � S`0_ Z J a`) zw — z = W O ' Luz (, zw 0 c - F- M wm 0 z � W � z U E O 00p -.1 � z Z z w z W v =,_5 y. W 0 z 4- ) Er� O c, > - 2m Q --+ ,- � Z ce Q 0 ~ 1 E J 0) -� � ' m > ¢ W ° 0- �' �' om = -F+ IMMO d z0 = U wco 0 O w �► a 0 � = CO G :71J °? -, Cpm =CC CO CD ai 0 z Q.1 C0ai ai -J >- < z Ce_ p Z Q Ca CD Z U (and21 aaeld uo;llweH : P6PZ) iapoda21 pnoa Lucul swell - L;uawq e d :;uawyoe;;b a N. 0 ai ' z • 0 O. U ¢ Cr Y wW = z a a' n ct 1=- w o = W H �• m = oo >- cr k4 � §- J Z Q Q' '� i 9.A.8 9A ?'apLr& Battu NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee s a Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that hY he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- 8 ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published 1° in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published °- at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published c in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as = second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- E ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid = nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this .. advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. v. ,. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# "t BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT 1368601 PUBLIC HEARING 45-172052 c 0 1 Pub Dates November 28,2016 p z Ta a) a) J co C a) E .c V asQ w C co E .c V m r r Q 2 I otm,e4 /?‘ eA.,,4,. (Sign ure of affiant) NI7 Sworn to and subscribed before me i o•''r'''"'�`' Notary Pub1iN�State of FlorWe � This Decembe O1,2016 '• g Commission *FF 900170�ty: p.`�d� My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 .4 I ( "4'''•• Bondedthrough National Notary llsen. 0 (Signatur of affiant) ' Packet Pg. 101 • v9.A.8 9 A MA Monday,November 28,2016 Naples Daily News Army's advance in Aleppo .em',i displaces thousands C Rebel defenses collapse Sy-rims state TV broadcast a video Sat- before government attack soder and his family after`arrlyfie t said PHILIP LSSA ASSOCIATED PRESS the family E ahad been t trapped in Matothe report.�•'aken _ rt Hanan. AWE YOUR !Q Thousands of residents fled Sunday The Lebanese Al-Manor TVchannel re- 0. amid simultaneous advances by Syrian ported frau the neighborhood Sunday — MOTI�ER IN NAW G10 government and Kurdish-led forces into morning.showing workers and soldiers J A modem mirror front Wilson Lighting Es Q Z eastern Aleppoclearing debris against a backdrop of pee eee&to%weal your pew.Let us Rebel Menses collapsed as govern- bombed-out buildings on both sidee,of a help you prep for the holidays today! 0) went forces pushed into the city's Sakhour wide thoroughfare.Al-Manor is operated C Q neighborhood coming within about half a by Henbollah,the Lebanese militant group • mile of commanding a corridor in eastern aligned with the Syrian govesnment. C W Aleppo for the first time since rebels The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic C = swept into the city in 2012,according to Forces'advance into Bustan al-Sasha N _ Syrian state media and the Syrian Obser- dealt the opposition a further blow. N Q vatcey for Human Rights monitoring Rebels and opposition figures have Q group. long accused the SDF and its predecessor '1,1: CS ...I Kurdish-led forces operating autono- groups of conspiring with the government CL meanwhile, CO mostly of the rebels and the government, to quash a nationwide revolt. Ivrt.y C Q r meanwhile,seized the Bustan al-Basha Ara)denied there was anycoordinatios neighborhood in northern Aleppo,allow- between government and Kurdish-led ��rcet•zyFs Trade erne.Ivey '39 59:6006 I f Z Q d mg thousands of civilians to flee the heel- forces. BON'ITA SPRINGS-3333 Renassance Blvd•239918.9000 mated district according to Ahmad Hiso "We were responding to calls from real- Monday-Thuerday 9 to 6•Friday 9 u r Saturday t0 to s Q Araj,an official with the Syrian Democrat- dents in Bustan al-Basin to secure the , , i i' 11 t is Forces. neighborhood,"he said.He added the SDF .. The government's push,backed by had entered the area handily as rebel mil- n. f/) thousands of Shute militia fighters from itunts fled t;.-- IX Lebanon,Iraq,andiras,and under theoe- Aleppo used to be Syrias largest city 4 ft/��}'/�T /'y dal casionalcover ofthe Russian air force,has and commercecapitalbefore its neighbor- bare Aare Z..ti I1 i F1 I I V it CS C laid waste to Aleppo's eastern neighbor- hoods were devastated by the country's R1• loin j L,t } to) O hoods and trapped some 250,000 people. more than Pve-yearlong civil war. ac's a SHUTTERS'ERS co N Food supplies are running perilously The UN.'s child agency warned Sun- low,the U.N.warned Thursday,and ate- day that nearly 500,000 children were now s- — .. 0. lentless air assault by government forces living under siege in Syria,cut off from v A R E has damaged or destroyed every hospital food and medical aid mostly in eras un- - �'" a`) d m the in east Aleppoder government co trol.That figure has - _ - , ,I{,�C T T H E 0 said n din doubled in lesethan a year ie-- N T t fl. tressed messages m social media that Many are now spending their days un- — - '*•''- `$" BEGINNING thousands of people were fleeing to the dergrsond, as hospitals, schools and •E U — 0 city's governmentcontrolled western homes remain vulnerable to aerial b�- I > N V N neighborhoods,away from the govern- bardment .:. f0 ...6 men's merciless assault,or deeper into "Children are being killed and injured, Plantation Shutters l Blloat&Shades I Hurricane Fabric I Impact Windows&Doors opposition-held eastern Aleppotoo afraid to go to school or even play,sur- Emnor Bahamas&Colonials I Roildown&Accordion Shutters Q Q CD 0 -The situation in besieged Aleppo(is) viving with link food and hardly any Visit our Showroom Today or Call to Schedule Your In-Home Estimate very very bad,thousands of eastern rani- mednthon Lake.'ICEFExecutiveDuxa Nr dents are moving to the western side of the tor Anthonydake."This is noway mlive— a city,"said Khaled Khatib,a photographer and too many are dying." a Save$300nt for the Syrian Civil Defense search-and- Activists also reported civilian casual- a ... `�� orders) rescue group,also known as the White ties Sunday from a presumed government 0000100.or more Helmets. or Russian airsfrike on a village outside `. oferret mshutters, Aleppo is going to die,"he posted on revere aim ante Twitter The Treat Coordination Committees _--- .- P th of C Syrian state media reported govern- activist network in Syria Iepwtcd 15 civil- ��"- NAPLES SHUTTER Croce to toniers. C .— � -- -- wan air. . mens forces had seized the Jabal Badro ians killed ma Russiaolledbike on the vil- .ntr',T. .._-. smrserrgwra 0 LC) neighborhood and entered Sakhour Sun- lege of Annjara,controlled by the opposi- www.naplesshutter.com W.naples5htltter.COm r CV day after it took control of the Masaken tion in the western Aleppo countryside, 1025 Power St.,Naples,FL 34104 I Mon-Fs 8:30am-5:OOpm CC Hanan neighborhood Saturday. and tens of others wounded. V r crs o x `= co NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING +'r CO Up Q O Q ALLERGIES NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE z° V/ V Notice a hereby given that a pudic nearing will be held by the Collier County Planning w Z ts'S ZCommission.at 9:00 AM.,on Thursday,December 15th,2016,in the Board 01 County tC '�' Commissioners Meeting Room,Thed Floor.Collar Government Center,3299 East 0) A S T H M A HEADACHES 9 AN TNA,Naples to oOARD AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COWER J c . COUNTY FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.2004-41,AS AMENDED,THE r C COWER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. WHICH ESTABUSHED THE CO COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF �.+ N z Q * * * COWER COUNTY.FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS 0 MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN O _ I- 1 R D U�� DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL TO RPUD ZONING E DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(RPUD)ZONING Z C 11) O © , I I I I M ■ DEVELOPMENTDISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MU�LTIEFAMILY DW WNG V -C N O UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE as RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 49 OUTH. 26 T,COWER ...., C 0 (--21E A Hr-__Hcm EFFECTIVE DATE I COUNTY,FLORIDA CONSL20 60001255]ISTING OF 514-SACRES;AND EBY PEROVIDING AN Additional Services Include: -cecsed&Insured C •A/C Cleaning*Air Handler Cleaning fcry-our p erection Pme Rope RD zCAC1876190 *Sanitizing*Duct Repairs MRSR91•MFSA75 , P Pr *Certified Mold Removal , ' 5 V •Before&After Inspection 34-9•State-of-the-Art UV Purification OntoBLVD Q tD Systems smarm'" (in Lowest Price:FREE 4 A af0 All:n1 .etl parties aro Invited to appear and be hoard. Conan of Me proposed N Even! ORDNANCE ill be made available for inspection at Me Collier County Clank's of5ce, t E 5511 t fourth flee Collier CountyGevemment Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,suite 401, 0 03 T • is Mold !:F 4 Naples FL ane week poor to i.~•e schetluled hearing.Written comments must ba fie0 0 F I with the Zoning Division.Zoning Serve.Serono,poor to Thursday,December 55th, 7 :i Inspection 2076• ♦ til L, e a perso.aannes to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning T /11 (Re9• �:With NDN \ Commission with respect a any mattes considered at suchmeet+ng or hearing,he will W Unlimited" it `,., need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a z .Q $gg� ii Coupon E vematim record of the proceedings a made.which record includes the testimony and Z11N Vents! r i \‘ evidence upon which the appeal a to be based. tl > ,� (IIFdodeSt main;'N1i Nle Caq�Oty.�� 4nly' �/ 1 If you are a person wnh a daabikry who needs any accommodation m order to ♦+eN► Z 0 &Return) u t pamapale.n this proceeding,you are entitled et no coat to you,to the provision of II Iyy certain assistance-Please contact the Collier County Facihties Management Division, r mthlteco.;rm Osy.a r it '. bcated at 3335 Tamiami Trail East.Suite 101,Napa FL 34112.5356,12391 252- E� 8380,at least two days poor to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing ��/8�`8.1�8g1t,I Toll Free: 888-458-9428 impaired orgy Planning in the Board of County Commissioners Office. " � - z Collier County Piannng Commission Mark Swain,Chairman ILE /ai�� Naples: 239-530-0{J��104 November 28.2016 ND-1368601 •_ vf \M Zink W3 C iy O Cle t E Packet Pg. 102 9A.8 Petition No. PUDZ-PL20160001255 [ 9A AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE FOR PROVIDING INDIVIDUAL MAIL NOTICE TO AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS 1. I hereby certify that pursuant to Subsections 10.03.05.B.8 and 10.03.05.B.10 of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did give notice of the public hearing before the Collier County Planning o m Commission scheduled for December 15, 2016 by U.S. mail to the ct a) affected property owners at the addresses provided to me by the Collier al a County Property Appraiser's Office on November 23, 2016. A copy of c the list of addresses from the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office F I is attached to this Affidavit. v a) Tr N 2. Copies of the letters mailed to the affected property owners are attached to c 0 this Affidavit. ry o zo0 �/ Dated this .23 day of AI r 2016. Z Ts 0) a) J op g (/7 t. , • -'s‘f_, v as Siga, re a Alki (i5 C Pnnt Name i rca a ..;.( Q 0 uk k)— t- Print Title I oft Packet Pg. 103 9.A.8 t 9A STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) ss COUNTY OF COLLIER) �jBEFORE ME. a duly authorized notary of the State of Florida, personally appeared , who is personally known to me or produced i stated as identification, and under oath that the above is true and correct and to the best of his/her knowledge. a 3 day of DATED thi ,2016. m ea E: � o G%%%1%IIIIlUlII///// , r \` ao�.. oA,'% Notary, State of Florida 'o,"iusioti 1 tr t`Q mond • * 4110.—' *= • Notary Printed Name N T #FF998114 :. gc 0 o Q ice'q9f'•'?60 SSm`0• \97 My commission expires: i,11110C ST al a) ao co r c as 2 oft Packet Pg. 104 9A8 COLLIER COUNTY (� f� Growth Management Department 7 n November 23, 2016 Dear Property Owner: This is to advise you that because you may have interest in the proceedings or you own property located within 500 feet (urban areas) or 1,000 feet (rural areas) of the following described property, that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on December 15, 2016,in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL., to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Hamilton Place RPUD to allow development of up to 66 single-family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge a Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.75+/- acres; and by c providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] You are invited to appear and be heard at the public hearing. You may also submit your comments in writing. NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK v ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC u MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS o PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE co CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY STAFF MEMBER NOTED BELOW,A MINIMUM 42 OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE Z BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. an w J Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which °° record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management a Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners m Office. E V This petition, and other pertinent information related to this petition, is kept on file and may be reviewed at the Growth g Management Department building located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Please contact the staff < member noted below at (239)-252-2931 to set up an appointment if you wish to review the file. Sincerely, Eric L. Johnson,AICP, CFM,LEED Green Associate Principal Planner Packet Pg. 105 (andN eoeld uo;IlweH : 176t' ) suol;eol;l;oN le6ai - g ;uawyoe;;y :;uawyoe;;y Q - co -wigs. elm . j1 !!!IN1F1jijF 0 fin • as a. I2'. p 2.1 U fr - /♦ I.---r,i i o teitra----ill"Ern maN 1111111% t,Ii ram MI IME MEI gi NE`e`telpir : 2 o A 41,-1" 2 •iiI 4 r ; .. �ii �_ 110 _ • .■.� L.0 LO CV a p acl. p x I a = O U 0 1 ')-,R v-.).cl cl..' ';? 5 9.'`sc-):;):?. .'.) 2: -.,-)J 9 0,,r,. :., 5 - ' i c' 'c'E ,.'t)'€9" i.- —is c\i 0 J :1)cio 0- CV Y / }Sr\S O art,j :`;,,, r'""_' 4'4 Z N O O kk--72 t ✓ +., I 0 I Om N CO CD R- >, c 0 O OH UOTS6UIn 1 , \V N _v . 0 r 0 co F. Z O CD CU V _ICY CD L--` ,-- _ 0) LLInF- rz - -----r-'` a V _ N Gel 6I - aodJb C CI_ E. CDE D U 0 CI 9.A.9 9A other Public Notices Other PubticNotices NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, January 24,2017, in the Board of County Commissioner's Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: The purpose of the hearing is to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004- 6 41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT M CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING a REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER cd COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE d ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING o N CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY D. ,p FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A i3 RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING c DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUDo TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/ E o.- OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED m N EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD I a IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER w COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY et =` PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] v 11- cv A copyof the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the n7 Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are ay. ) invited to attend and be heard. et A N o NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must G register with the County manager prior to presentation of co `' the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be 3 Z, limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual a) •a to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. a) If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or Q v) organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. v -a °' Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in Q q the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum 7a zof 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, a) in written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days pKior to the public hearing. All materials used in c presentations before the Board will become a permanent part m of the record. 1= r Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board 2 will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and Q therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112- 5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA DONNA FIALA,CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK,CLERK By: Ann Jennejohn Deputy Clerk(SEAL) January 4,2017 No. 1424132 Packet.Pg. 107 9A Ex parte Disclosure - Commissioner Solis COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA 01/24/2017 9k Hamilton Place NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE Meetings ❑Correspondence ❑e-mails ❑Calls Alternative disclosure on this item. CONSENT AGENDA 16.A.3. Recommendation to approve for recording the minor final plat of Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples Benvenuto Court Replat, Application Number PL20160002720. NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE ( 'Meetings ❑Correspondence Fe-mails Calls 9A Co e-r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2016 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20160001255 HAMILTON PLACE RPUD PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owners: Applicant(Contract Purchaser): Maria Santos Edmund and Betty Poore WCI Communities, LLC 2316 Andrew Drive 7025 Nighthawk Drive 24301 Walden Center Drive Naples,FL 34112 Naples,FL 34105 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Elfrieda H Sutherland Trust Agent: do Gayle Ann Durrance 2076 Sagebrush Circle D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Naples,FL 34120 Q. Grady Minor and Associates,P.A. 3800 Via Del Ray Bonita Springs, FL 34134 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD) zoning district. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18,Township 49 South,Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition seeks to rezone the property to RPUD to allow for the development of up to sixty-six (66) single-family and/or multi-family dwelling units on 9.75±acres. (See location map on page 2) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 1 of 13 December 5, 2016 1 w X11® Willa r iii 3AI.1.11.30000 �W H�° goo 1 e raav��.iur�.��. �, o4°,7,B o D rG(01Jv€ ° CI a e gra t,D ----�� U /i� ', -� _\ z w° 0 m 0 z a -0- - (1. -- '6!8 j 0 --..... 1 �l W (� ...4-(--)---\.---11- ('' ,g di O C. LO CL o a N x o 0• i g g e = o a �� a E > > E o Ai co 0 a �g �> �,�. t a is � � II4 H a) 0 1 U Z CL it W E 3 n 7 Z � N C O O O ap - a", O =� ^ J CD ii Q `o CO O U N F z 0 a) J CT ct70 n a a O 3 N J C Nra8 6uiIInd-1.1OdJ!V to 0_ E. 0 E 0 0 0 9A ' SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: The subject project proposes a density of 6.77 dwelling units per acre (DU/AC). This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding boundaries of the Hamilton Place RPUD: North: Single-family residential, zoned Brynwood Preserve PUD (5.47 DU/AC) East: Residential, zoned Arlington Lakes PUD (6.0 DU/AC) South: Multi-family residential (condomimums), zoned Arlington Lakes PUD (6.0 DU/AC) West: Right-of-way for Livingston Road, farther west is vacant commercial, zoned Hiwasse CPDD (291,000 square feet) — • Sf 'CfR�a -< ,l,„...„ 474-461--45' y le,,.W_ '` _ _ - - ate+f o t O R E• o4 PRESERVE ,.�i r kItt ° Camiii7::Pi --- '....,,r, 4 kt ,--,-1-34-: — - Y MbMkAF . 'm# ril ?_ 2 n 9 PCI.- ILL ILL vs%—t 2 $4icui. IhKE'S ,rp ,, _. ie 4 d7144.m;. +;P� d zy ht "....... WAY ._ .N ghtha k UL��, " t 'C^w,� �°R d x,}. WHIPPOORYALE - �:° R� � �� ' •lon w�aad LMS�i� � � - ire ;� R "R 406140,'a �(. , :. tan { f Q: 44. ?� 1 4t y.. F �F- 'm FA- Lir j EY S :... # r 6 ',fi ` o ^' ,,,A4_,,,- 4�,�S �yffVE a F,e' �>�� f.b. i a rin } s Posta,a l.R ,,, , R? M gt- r ! h '.k s_ Cf'R tq' 2 r c t k 4.e. 6 t3Macip sa C1R, � _m4e 'E Com]{ a i�4 Q lY '7."=1:,"7:® `t ffr a t. `4 41 ` r, . ' d Ox1.4 d LN 4 fir :dt ` G i L N �# �`.. . ;it.., l WHIPPOORYJILL WOOD Aerial(County GIS) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element(FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban designated area(Urban Mixed Use District,Urban Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The property is also located within a mile of the Pine Ridge Road - I- 75 Mixed Use Activity Center(MUAC#10). Page 3 of 13 PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD December 5,2016 9 A f The FLUE provision for the Density Rating System states, If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be added. The density band around a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map and shall not apply within the Estates Designation or for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area. More than fifty percent (50%) of the project is located within the density band, so the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. The FLUE Consistency Review provides a more comprehensive analysis of how the proposed project is consistent with the relative objectives and policies of the GMP (see Attachment 3 — FLUE Consistency Review). In short, the proposed RPUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2014 and 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links(roadway segments)directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 4 of 13 December 5,2016 9A c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. The proposed rezoning to allow a maximum of sixty-six (66) multi-family units on the subject property that will generate approximately 43 PM peak hour, peak direction trips on the immediately adjacent roadway link, Livingston Road. Livingston Road is a six-lane divided facility and has a current service volume of 3,100 trips,with a remaining capacity of approximately 1,624 trips between Pine Ridge Road/Golden Gate Parkway, and is currently at LOS B as shown in the 2015 AUIR. Please note at the time of writing this report the 2016 AUIR was not yet adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (Board); however, staff reviewed this road segment for the CCPC's consideration,finding a remaining capacity of 1,594 trips and the same LOS B. Staff, therefore,finds that the proposed project does not significantly impact the adjacent roadway links, and there is sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the five(5)-year transportation planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element(CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). A minimum of 0.97 acre of native vegetation is required to be retained for the RPUD. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions,such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to or amend RPUDs shall be in the form of an RPUD Master Plan of development, along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The RPUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5,Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission • Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 5 of 13 December 5,2016 9A c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. The proposed rezoning to allow a maximum of sixty-six (66) multi-family units on the subject property that will generate approximately 43 PM peak hour, peak direction trips on the immediately adjacent roadway link, Livingston Road. Livingston Road is a six-lane divided facility and has a current service volume of 3,100 trips,with a remaining capacity of approximately 1,624 trips between Pine Ridge Road/Golden Gate Parkway, and is currently at LOS B as shown in the 2015 AUIR. Please note at the time of writing this report the 2016 AUIR was not yet adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (Board); however, staff reviewed this road segment for the CCPC's consideration,finding a remaining capacity of 1,594 trips and the same LOS B. Staff, therefore,finds that the proposed project does not significantly impact the adjacent roadway links, and there is sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the five(5)-year transportation planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element(CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). A minimum of 0.97 acre of native vegetation is required to be retained for the RPUD. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions,such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to or amend RPUDs shall be in the form of an RPUD Master Plan of development, along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The RPUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5,Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission • Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 5 of 13 December 5,2016 9 or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading"Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD Document to address environmental concerns. The location of the preserve was selected to retain the highest quality wetlands on-site and to provide connectivity to existing preserves and flowways on neighboring properties to the east. No listed species of wildlife were observed on the property. Air plants (Tillandsia)have been observed on cypress trees within the RPUD and will be retained or relocated in accordance with the requirements LDC Section 3.04.03. This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2,Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Landscape Review: The Master Plan shows that a fifteen (15)-foot wide Type "B" Buffer is proposed along the project's north property line, except in areas depicted as preserve, such as in the northeast corner of the site as well as along the RPUD's entire eastern boundary. A thirty (30)-foot wide access easement runs along the entire southern property boundary. As such, the south landscape buffer,proposed just north of this access easement, is depicted as either a fifteen (15)-foot wide Type "A" Buffer or a ten (10)-foot wide Type "B" Buffer, depending on how the subject project is developed. A twenty (20)-foot wide Type "D" Buffer is proposed along Livingston Road. Each single-family lot is required to provide at least one (1) canopy tree. The proposed right-of- way will be wide enough to accommodate trees in connection with a street tree program pursuant to LDC Section 4.06.05.A.1 if it is determined that the lot sizes and building setbacks do not provide enough room to accommodate the requisite trees. It should be noted, however, that this type of detailed analysis to ensure compliance with the LDC will appropriately occur during a subsequent development process. School District: At this time there is sufficient capacity within the elementary and middle concurrency service areas and in an adjacent high school concurrency service area of the proposed development. At the time of SDP or platting,the project will be evaluated for school concurrency. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Utilities Review: Water and wastewater service will be provided by the Collier County Water- Sewer District, which has adequate public utility facilities readily available along Livingston Rd. All water distribution and wastewater collection systems shall be conveyed to the District. County Utility Easements shall be dedicated for all utility facilities to be owned, operated, and maintained by the District. Design, construction, and conveyance of the utility facilities shall conform to current Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures. Applicable system development charges and connection fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 6 of 13 December 5,2016 9 or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading"Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD Document to address environmental concerns. The location of the preserve was selected to retain the highest quality wetlands on-site and to provide connectivity to existing preserves and flowways on neighboring properties to the east. No listed species of wildlife were observed on the property. Air plants (Tillandsia)have been observed on cypress trees within the RPUD and will be retained or relocated in accordance with the requirements LDC Section 3.04.03. This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2,Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Landscape Review: The Master Plan shows that a fifteen (15)-foot wide Type "B" Buffer is proposed along the project's north property line, except in areas depicted as preserve, such as in the northeast corner of the site as well as along the RPUD's entire eastern boundary. A thirty (30)-foot wide access easement runs along the entire southern property boundary. As such, the south landscape buffer,proposed just north of this access easement, is depicted as either a fifteen (15)-foot wide Type "A" Buffer or a ten (10)-foot wide Type "B" Buffer, depending on how the subject project is developed. A twenty (20)-foot wide Type "D" Buffer is proposed along Livingston Road. Each single-family lot is required to provide at least one (1) canopy tree. The proposed right-of- way will be wide enough to accommodate trees in connection with a street tree program pursuant to LDC Section 4.06.05.A.1 if it is determined that the lot sizes and building setbacks do not provide enough room to accommodate the requisite trees. It should be noted, however, that this type of detailed analysis to ensure compliance with the LDC will appropriately occur during a subsequent development process. School District: At this time there is sufficient capacity within the elementary and middle concurrency service areas and in an adjacent high school concurrency service area of the proposed development. At the time of SDP or platting,the project will be evaluated for school concurrency. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Utilities Review: Water and wastewater service will be provided by the Collier County Water- Sewer District, which has adequate public utility facilities readily available along Livingston Rd. All water distribution and wastewater collection systems shall be conveyed to the District. County Utility Easements shall be dedicated for all utility facilities to be owned, operated, and maintained by the District. Design, construction, and conveyance of the utility facilities shall conform to current Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures. Applicable system development charges and connection fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 6 of 13 December 5,2016 9Ar Zoning Services Review: Staff analyzed the proposed uses and associated development standards. The abutting development to the north, Brynwood Preserve PUD,has been developed with single- family detached dwellings. The PUD Document for this PUD also allows for two-family dwellings and multi-family dwellings. To the south and east,the Arlington Lakes PUD allows single-family detached dwellings, single-family attached dwellings, zero-lot-line, patio dwellings, and multi- family dwellings. The Arlington Lakes PUD also allows Group Care Facilities (category I and II), care units, nursing homes, and the like. The uses proposed in the Hamilton Place RPUD (i.e., single-family detached, single-family attached, single-family variable lot line, and multi-family dwellings) are comparable and compatible to the uses approved in the aforementioned PUDs. With respect to development standards, staff evaluated the standards of the proposed RPUD and compared them with the standards of the Brynwood Preserve PUD and the Arlington Lakes PUD. The Brynwood Preserve PUD has been developed with single-family detached homes. The Arlington Lakes PUD to the south has been developed with condominium buildings. Staff determined the proposed development standards are comparable and compatible with the development standards of the aforementioned PUDs. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage,sewer,water, and other utilities. The subject site fronts on Livingston Road. Water and wastewater facilities are located within the right-of-way, and each has enough capacity to serve the proposed RPUD. Drainage solutions would be evaluated in connection with SDP/platting and construction permits. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application,which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals,objectives,and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report (or within an accompanying memorandum). PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 7 of 13 December 5,2016 9Ar Zoning Services Review: Staff analyzed the proposed uses and associated development standards. The abutting development to the north, Brynwood Preserve PUD,has been developed with single- family detached dwellings. The PUD Document for this PUD also allows for two-family dwellings and multi-family dwellings. To the south and east,the Arlington Lakes PUD allows single-family detached dwellings, single-family attached dwellings, zero-lot-line, patio dwellings, and multi- family dwellings. The Arlington Lakes PUD also allows Group Care Facilities (category I and II), care units, nursing homes, and the like. The uses proposed in the Hamilton Place RPUD (i.e., single-family detached, single-family attached, single-family variable lot line, and multi-family dwellings) are comparable and compatible to the uses approved in the aforementioned PUDs. With respect to development standards, staff evaluated the standards of the proposed RPUD and compared them with the standards of the Brynwood Preserve PUD and the Arlington Lakes PUD. The Brynwood Preserve PUD has been developed with single-family detached homes. The Arlington Lakes PUD to the south has been developed with condominium buildings. Staff determined the proposed development standards are comparable and compatible with the development standards of the aforementioned PUDs. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage,sewer,water, and other utilities. The subject site fronts on Livingston Road. Water and wastewater facilities are located within the right-of-way, and each has enough capacity to serve the proposed RPUD. Drainage solutions would be evaluated in connection with SDP/platting and construction permits. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application,which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals,objectives,and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report (or within an accompanying memorandum). PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 7 of 13 December 5,2016 9 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements,restrictions on design,and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least sixty percent (60%) of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities,both public and private. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e.,GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies,to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations,or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case,based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. No deviations are proposed in connection with this request to rezone to RPUD. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 8 of 13 December 5,2016 9 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements,restrictions on design,and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least sixty percent (60%) of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities,both public and private. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e.,GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies,to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations,or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case,based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. No deviations are proposed in connection with this request to rezone to RPUD. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 8 of 13 December 5,2016 9A . Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals,objectives,and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. There are no other RPUDs located within the immediate vicinity of the subject property; however, the proposed project relates well to the surrounding projects, particularly those containing residential land uses. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The rectangular shape boundary of the RPUD logically follows the external boundary of the parcels assembled for the rezoning. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary,per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed RPUD is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development,or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e.,GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 9 of 13 December 5,2016 9A . Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals,objectives,and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. There are no other RPUDs located within the immediate vicinity of the subject property; however, the proposed project relates well to the surrounding projects, particularly those containing residential land uses. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The rectangular shape boundary of the RPUD logically follows the external boundary of the parcels assembled for the rezoning. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary,per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed RPUD is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development,or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e.,GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 9 of 13 December 5,2016 9 A Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed rezoning request for up to sixty-six (66) residential units is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area, provided the project's stormwater management system is designed to discharge into the Whippoorwill Flowway. Stormwater Best Management Practices, treatment, and storage on this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting with the South Florida Water Management District, and County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, including stormwater calculations, at time of SDP and/or plat. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated this RPUD would reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property.Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The Hiwasse CPUD is currently vacant and staff does not anticipate this proposed RPUD would serve as a deterrent to its improvement. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 10 of 13 December 5,2016 9 A Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed rezoning request for up to sixty-six (66) residential units is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area, provided the project's stormwater management system is designed to discharge into the Whippoorwill Flowway. Stormwater Best Management Practices, treatment, and storage on this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting with the South Florida Water Management District, and County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, including stormwater calculations, at time of SDP and/or plat. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated this RPUD would reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property.Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The Hiwasse CPUD is currently vacant and staff does not anticipate this proposed RPUD would serve as a deterrent to its improvement. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 10 of 13 December 5,2016 9A 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed design standards cannot be achieved without rezoning to an RPUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff's opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which _ would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the RPUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the RPUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no impact on public facility adequacy in regard to utilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health,safety,and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 11 of 13 December 5,2016 9A 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed design standards cannot be achieved without rezoning to an RPUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff's opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which _ would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the RPUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the RPUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no impact on public facility adequacy in regard to utilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health,safety,and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 11 of 13 December 5,2016 9 A ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on September 27, 2016 at the Naples Church of Christ in Naples, Florida. The meeting commenced at 5:37 p.m. and ended at approximately 6:11 p.m. The NIM meeting minutes are included in Attachment 2—Application and Support Material. Many of the questions dealt with the proposed density, buffering, recreation/amenities, and location of access point. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on November 28, 2016. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: 1) Proposed Ordinance 2) Application and Support Material 3) FLUE Consistency Review 4) Density Map 5) Legal Notifications 6) Emails_Letters from Public PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 12 of 13 December 5,2016 9 A ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on September 27, 2016 at the Naples Church of Christ in Naples, Florida. The meeting commenced at 5:37 p.m. and ended at approximately 6:11 p.m. The NIM meeting minutes are included in Attachment 2—Application and Support Material. Many of the questions dealt with the proposed density, buffering, recreation/amenities, and location of access point. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on November 28, 2016. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: 1) Proposed Ordinance 2) Application and Support Material 3) FLUE Consistency Review 4) Density Map 5) Legal Notifications 6) Emails_Letters from Public PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 12 of 13 December 5,2016 4 9 A PREPARED BY: 4or 1 c iz t /16 ERIC JOHN I +, AICP, CFM, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: 7-20- - / --. 7:?.-,L1 ------- --- ii 7-1 k-: RAYMON V. ELLOWS,ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING VISION __. (c-21. - 1C, N. MIKE BOSI, AICP,DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION APPROVED BY: .11 .0i irlir " ►- —.sr"' 4„2- --1 --- /4, J' MES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT (::: ?.. C/1( f.V1 �., i LA /14 DAVID S. W KISON DATE DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 13 of 13 9Taylor Ex Parte A - Commissioner y - Commissioner Taylor COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA 01/24/2017 ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district for the project known as Hamilton Place RPUD to allow development of up to 66 single- family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.75+/-acres; and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20160001255]. 1 I Pine Ridge RD �uT Cr PROJECT 1 LOCATION G J [tt 11 NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM M SEE FILE ®Meetings (Correspondence ®e-mails ®Calls Staff Report Had mtg. with Richard Yovanovich and Wayne Arnold on January 20th, I9 k , GrecoSherry From: Dianna Quintanilla [DQuintanilla@cyklawfirm.com] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 4:37 PM To: TaylorPenny Subject: Meeting Request: Hamilton PUD Good afternoon, Rich would like to meet with you, along with Wayne Arnold, regarding the upcoming agenda item, Hamilton PUD. Would you be available any of the following times below: Wednesday January 18th Friday January 20th, after 9:30 Monday January 23rd Thank you. Dianna Quintanilla Legal Assistant to Richard D.Yovanovich, An& COLEMAN Esq. Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. � � � 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 (239)435-3535 (239)435-1218(f) This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication in error,please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the above email address.Thank you. 1 9 Pi GrecoSherry From: GrecoSherry on behalf of TaylorPenny Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 1:27 PM To: Dianna Quintanilla Cc: TaylorPenny Subject: RE: Meeting Request: Hamilton PUD Hi Dianna, Commissioner Taylor is free after 11 AM on Friday,January 20th. I can put you in tentatively for 11:30 AM,just please confirm that you can make it.Thank you. sherry Greco Sherry Greco Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Penny Taylor, District 4 239-252-8604 SherryGreco@colliergov.net Co er County From: Dianna Quintanilla [mailto:DQuintanilla@cyklawfirm.com] Sent: Friday,January 13, 2017 4:37 PM To:TaylorPenny Subject: Meeting Request: Hamilton PUD Good afternoon, Rich would like to meet with you, along with Wayne Arnold, regarding the upcoming agenda item, Hamilton PUD. Would you be available any of the following times below: Wednesday January 18th Friday January 20th, after 9:30 Monday January 23rd Thank you. Dianna Quintanilla COLEMAN Legal Assistant to Richard D.Yovanovich, Esq. YOVA Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North,Suite 300 KOESTER Naples, Florida 34103 (239)435-3535 (239)435-1218 (f) This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient,you 1 i are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication in error,please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us of the above email address.Thank you. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 GrecoSherry 9A From: Dianna Quintanilla [DQuintanilla@cyklawfirm.com] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 4:37 PM To: TaylorPenny Subject: Meeting Request: Hamilton PUD Good afternoon, Rich would like to meet with you, along with Wayne Arnold, regarding the upcoming agenda item, Hamilton PUD. Would you be available any of the following times below: Wednesday January 18t1i Friday January 20fh, after 9:30 Monday January 23rd Thank you. Dianna Quintaniffa COLEMAN '�l Legal Assistant to Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. YOVANOV1CH Coleman Yovanovich & Koester,P.A. K ; T ER 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples,Florida 34103 (239) 435-3535 (239) 435-1218 (1) This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication in error,please notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the above email address.Thank you. 1 GrecoSherry 91\ ' ' Subject: Hamilton PUD, Richard Yovanovich - Coleman Yovanovich Koester&Wayne Arnold Location: your office Start: Fri 1/20/2017 11:30 AM End: Fri 1/20/2017 12:00 PM Recurrence: (none) Organizer: TaylorPenny 0 Meeting Request: Hamilton PUD Dianna Quintanilla - Secy 239-435-3535 9 A Cotner County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2016 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20160001255 HAMILTON PLACE RPUD PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owners: Applicant(Contract Purchaser): Maria Santos Edmund and Betty Poore WCI Communities, LLC 2316 Andrew Drive 7025 Nighthawk Drive 24301 Walden Center Drive Naples, FL 34112 Naples,FL 34105 Bonita Springs,FL 34135 Elfrieda H Sutherland Trust Agent: do Gayle Ann Durrance 2076 Sagebrush Circle D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Naples, FL 34120 Q. Grady Minor and Associates,P.A. 3800 Via Del Ray Bonita Springs, FL 34134 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD) zoning district. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South,Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition seeks to rezone the property to RPUD to allow for the development of up to sixty-six (66) single-family and/or multi-family dwelling units on 9.75±acres. (See location map on page 2) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 1 of 13 December 5,2016 ICX --0 a =0% k ' y a ® �:n Mill 111111® ®�1®1®® a ngr. r U a i PW i a g g^ % 3�roO H1W3D009 SON Li, ° �11111111"1111110� Q o. 1 G 1 um 1111 : a< (13 $ i o B. � . 1 s IMII MEI.lin 1:111M .c ® mim OM MN' ME NM AIME0Al N r ME MEI ®11_, 09 F J In a ° g ° N a E O U g H a -. 0 V ' , 0 a „.r MIMI ®111111111111111111111 ' 7, 1 N - 1 ZU L E Z c N c O O O O .— O a) N =N.. � ! CO 0 N O. NI- CO 9 2 -, O O_ Q� UO�S6Ulnl1 �_, `� _ o CO N U co in p ai v 0 J 2 Ni a2j 5unInd-podaid if a3 C a)E n U O 0 9 A . SURROUNDING LAND USE ANI) ZONING: The subject project proposes a density of 6.77 dwelling units per acre (DU/AC). This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding boundaries of the Hamilton Place RPUD: North: Single-family residential, zoned Brynwood Preserve PUD (5.47 DU/AC) East: Residential, zoned Arlington Lakes PUD (6.0 DU/AC) South: Multi-family residential (condomimums), zoned Arlington Lakes PUD (6.0 DU/AC) West: Right-of-way for Livingston Road, farther west is vacant commercial, zoned Hiwasse CPUD (291,000 square feet) �.,. c '� ' a-rear _ r.l _ - RELATEDGROUP . IL- gRYNY1ER r,tf n _ •^.an # G YT .:c ; CENTER _,�''rPUD V a_ '`" ca st �gto, ZotUn PUD 3 ,i, 4 4 c t� cP, U Zoning CPUD ''Z.,J PINE ` rt•1'at J e^ * t o iomn9 IPUD ' - CENTER �.E��a _•y ' Ke HIWASSE - BRYNWOOD t VOWIHOSPICE R_v` v e WAY rt em let DR.q:O ; t ...1*.:".."':: R wg: 'PRESE(RVE x' +z'P !F Excp PUL Yrs. .,t x�` Y },'� t NtgN io c�4 4iNi7 Zoning CFPUD a s �� 1. lB rt z t,1'I.E `.'� p' a �4e>D' _^M5w♦ L tS YE YL Grd VV S9Dart l a ) *. ,':�'-..Xw,�"n KENSINGTON t g ty o?p I. 1 'a K[ `r C t . i PARKK R.¢x +#T Pre S'`e v'.,.LN r �3u�1 e { Zoning RSE&0'd) s 4 r F. r- Y` z '� I zoning^' a.rssirawKa .. +wPI "`"e+� vw- zr., .. ,,, � 3� ... ZOmng.PUD ryr 7yB SPUD . ARUNG TON lNHiPPOORI�i .a i�+�i @• n I m 711 f "Vg'7Q4...P � LAKES�"{. LAKES i7—:-. `l-m ;...4.„_,e....)' j � B r v ii'w ri rf WAY r . M.f'(F;� T+{f /.1J V :ti-,2!.4.M 11 i. �:UI .Iq t� m`'! 't7' ,,.',7.l t I 4 3 1 + ap ro} *y" r n 9'"e} a T ..i R } y Z J �I'ti :1. c...or,, � L N 9ht r. ciOH � I''' - i(�`rk�3e Li* si 1. „Po t L x - nWA V.HIP CCPSJIL '� ado woo.d LN CIR,4","' ,Rt,ds` g i rP NE ,"tsuot , `- Y Zamng:PU0 i �i q PUD .., i 4 ; t 9?y { . es r f *R `Q'�}'1T' 's IC. `•nSt_PUD (. - qN v, 'fx Ner1IPOL2 £/ 7 � �*Arti •s.11, EVANS" 1a w rCIR �r�,� -`.,. " P .CPUD NAPLES t .09' ra '::Y i t. CHURCH OF t ,et�.,sF I'. y � r � I 1 r. CHRIST t ra IR .11 t 1 --1, u f �w • MF n 4`¢, ..,-'.-4).,,, 1. 6ALt.iCRAL #j(yOford IN vY' r''},r T• Str(alio , 41 .,,,,, 5.c' _ lip-N j :i:,,-.....,VMIPPOORWILL WOODS Aerial(County GIS) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element(FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban designated area(Urban Mixed Use District,Urban Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The property is also located within a mile of the Pine Ridge Road - I- 75 Mixed Use Activity Center(MUAC#10). PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 3 of 13 December 5, 2016 9 The FLUE provision for the Density Rating System states, If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be added. The density band around a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map and shall not apply within the Estates Designation or for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area. More than fifty percent (50%) of the project is located within the density band, so the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. The FLUE Consistency Review provides a more comprehensive analysis of how the proposed project is consistent with the relative objectives and policies of the GMP (see Attachment 3 — FLUE Consistency Review). In short, the proposed RPUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2014 and 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links(roadway segments)directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2%of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 4 of 13 December 5,2016 9 The FLUE provision for the Density Rating System states, If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be added. The density band around a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map and shall not apply within the Estates Designation or for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area. More than fifty percent (50%) of the project is located within the density band, so the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. The FLUE Consistency Review provides a more comprehensive analysis of how the proposed project is consistent with the relative objectives and policies of the GMP (see Attachment 3 — FLUE Consistency Review). In short, the proposed RPUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2014 and 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links(roadway segments)directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2%of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 4 of 13 December 5,2016 f 9A c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. The proposed rezoning to allow a maximum of sixty-six (66) multi-family units on the subject property that will generate approximately 43 PM peak hour, peak direction trips on the immediately adjacent roadway link, Livingston Road. Livingston Road is a six-lane divided facility and has a current service volume of 3,100 trips,with a remaining capacity of approximately 1,624 trips between Pine Ridge Road/Golden Gate Parkway, and is currently at LOS B as shown in the 2015 AUIR. Please note at the time of writing this report the 2016 AUIR was not yet adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (Board); however, staff reviewed this road segment for the CCPC's consideration,finding a remaining capacity of 1,594 trips and the same LOS B. Staff, therefore,finds that the proposed project does not significantly impact the adjacent roadway links, and there is sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the five (5)-year transportation planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element(CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). A minimum of 0.97 acre of native vegetation is required to be retained for the RPUD. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions,such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to or amend RPUDs shall be in the form of an RPUD Master Plan of development, along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The RPUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5,Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report(referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 5 of 13 December 5,2016 A..„., • or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading"Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD Document to address environmental concerns. The location of the preserve was selected to retain the highest quality wetlands on-site and to provide connectivity to existing preserves and flowways on neighboring properties to the east. No listed species of wildlife were observed on the property. Air plants (Tillandsia)have been observed on cypress trees within the RPUD and will be retained or relocated in accordance with the requirements LDC Section 3.04.03. This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Landscape Review: The Master Plan shows that a fifteen (15)-foot wide Type "B" Buffer is proposed along the project's north property line, except in areas depicted as preserve, such as in the northeast corner of the site as well as along the RPUD's entire eastern boundary. A thirty (30)-foot wide access easement runs along the entire southern property boundary. As such,the south landscape buffer,proposed just north of this access easement, is depicted as either a fifteen (15)-foot wide Type "A" Buffer or a ten (10)-foot wide Type "B" Buffer, depending on how the subject project is developed. A twenty (20)-foot wide Type "D" Buffer is proposed along Livingston Road. Each single-family lot is required to provide at least one (1) canopy tree. The proposed right-of- way will be wide enough to accommodate trees in connection with a street tree program pursuant to LDC Section 4.06.05.A.1 if it is determined that the lot sizes and building setbacks do not provide enough room to accommodate the requisite trees. It should be noted, however, that this type of detailed analysis to ensure compliance with the LDC will appropriately occur during a subsequent development process. School District: At this time there is sufficient capacity within the elementary and middle concurrency service areas and in an adjacent high school concurrency service area of the proposed development. At the time of SDP or platting,the project will be evaluated for school concurrency. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Utilities Review: Water and wastewater service will be provided by the Collier County Water- Sewer District, which has adequate public utility facilities readily available along Livingston Rd. All water distribution and wastewater collection systems shall be conveyed to the District. County Utility Easements shall be dedicated for all utility facilities to be owned, operated, and maintained by the District. Design, construction, and conveyance of the utility facilities shall conform to current Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures. Applicable system development charges and connection fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 6 of 13 December 5, 2016 91k Zoning Services Review: Staff analyzed the proposed uses and associated development standards. The abutting development to the north,Brynwood Preserve PUD,has been developed with single- family detached dwellings. The PUD Document for this PUD also allows for two-family dwellings and multi-family dwellings. To the south and east,the Arlington Lakes PUD allows single-family detached dwellings, single-family attached dwellings, zero-lot-line, patio dwellings, and multi- family dwellings. The Arlington Lakes PUD also allows Group Care Facilities (category I and II), care units, nursing homes, and the like. The uses proposed in the Hamilton Place RPUD (i.e., single-family detached, single-family attached, single-family variable lot line, and multi-family dwellings) are comparable and compatible to the uses approved in the aforementioned PUDs. With respect to development standards, staff evaluated the standards of the proposed RPUD and compared them with the standards of the Brynwood Preserve PUD and the Arlington Lakes PUD. The Brynwood Preserve PUD has been developed with single-family detached homes. The Arlington Lakes PUD to the south has been developed with condominium buildings. Staff determined the proposed development standards are comparable and compatible with the development standards of the aforementioned PUDs. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage,sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject site fronts on Livingston Road. Water and wastewater facilities are located within the right-of-way, and each has enough capacity to serve the proposed RPUD. Drainage solutions would be evaluated in connection with SDP/platting and construction permits. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application,which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals,objectives,and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report (or within an accompanying memorandum). PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 7 of 13 December 5,2016 9A . 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements,restrictions on design,and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least sixty percent (60%) of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e.,GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies,to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations,or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case,based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. No deviations are proposed in connection with this request to rezone to RPUD. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 8 of 13 December 5,2016 9A Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals,objectives,and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. There are no other RPUDs located within the immediate vicinity of the subject property; however, the proposed project relates well to the surrounding projects, particularly those containing residential land uses. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The rectangular shape boundary of the RPUD logically follows the external boundary of the parcels assembled for the rezoning. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed RPUD is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e.,GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 9 of 13 December 5,2016 9 A Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed rezoning request for up to sixty-six (66) residential units is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area, provided the project's stormwater management system is designed to discharge into the Whippoorwill Flowway. Stormwater Best Management Practices, treatment, and storage on this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting with the South Florida Water Management District, and County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, including stormwater calculations, at time of SDP and/or plat. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated this RPUD would reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property.Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning;however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The Hiwasse CPUD is currently vacant and staff does not anticipate this proposed RPUD would serve as a deterrent to its improvement. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 10 of 13 December 5, 2016 9A ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2,Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on September 27, 2016 at the Naples Church of Christ in Naples, Horida. The meeting commenced at 5:37 p.m. and ended at approximately 6:11 p.m. The NIM meeting minutes are included in Attachment 2—Application and Support Material. Many of the questions dealt with the proposed density, buffering, recreation/amenities, and location of access point. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on November 28, 2016. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: 1) Proposed Ordinance 2) Application and Support Material 3) FLUE Consistency Review 4) Density Map 5) Legal Notifications 6) Emails_Letters from Public PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 12 of 13 December 5, 2016 9A 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed design standards cannot be achieved without rezoning to an RPUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff's opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the RPUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the RPUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no impact on public facility adequacy in regard to utilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety,and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 11 of 13 December 5,2016 PREPARED BY: 9 A 2 Uc /zt /1 � ERIC JOHN , AICP. CFM. PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: RAYMOND.V.‘BELLOWS. ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING DIVISION MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION APPROVED BY: J• MES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ‘...yez& �. ILA /14 DAVID S. W KISON DATE DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 13 of 13