The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 01/24/2017 Item # 9A Proposed Agenda Changes Board of County Commissioners Meeting January 24, 2017 Continue Item 16F2 to the February 14,2017 BCC Meeting: Recommendation to adopt the 2017 Strategic Plan with the inclusion of minor changes based upon direction received at the Board Workshop on January 3, 2017. (Commissioner Taylor's request) Move Item 17A to Item 16Al2: Recommendation to hold one of two required hearings for Land Development Code amendments at 5:05 p.m. on Tuesday, March 14,2017. (County Attorney's request) Time Certain Items: Items 9A and 9B to be heard immediately following Item 5A 01/24/2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Hamilton Place RPUD to allow development of up to 66 single -family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.75+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff’s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition, and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The petitioner is requesting that the Board consider an application to rezone property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain an adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the CCPC to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map of the GMP. The property is also located within a mile of the Pine Ridge Road - I-75 Mixed Use Activity Center (MUAC #10). The FLUE provision for the Density Rating System states, If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be added. The density band around a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map and shall not apply within the Estates 9.A Packet Pg. 35 01/24/2017 Designation or for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area. More than fifty percent (50%) of the project is located within the density band, so the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. The FLUE Consistency Review provides a more comprehensive analysis of how the proposed project is consistent with the relative objectives and policies of the GMP. In short, the proposed RPUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2014 and 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways. The proposed rezoning to allow a maximum of sixty-six (66) multi-family units on the subject property that will generate approximately 43 PM peak hour, peak direction trips on the immediat ely adjacent roadway link, Livingston Road. Livingston Road is a six-lane divided facility and has a current service volume of 3,100 trips, with a remaining capacity of approximately 1,624 trips between Pine Ridge Road/Golden Gate Parkway, and is currently at LOS B as shown in the 2015 AUIR. Please note at the time of writing this report the 2016 AUIR was not yet adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (Board); however, staff reviewed this road segment for the Board’s consideration, finding a remaini ng capacity of 1,594 trips and the same LOS B. Staff, therefore, finds that the proposed project does not significantly impact the adjacent roadway links, and there is sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the five (5)-year transportation planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. 9.A Packet Pg. 36 01/24/2017 Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). A minimum of 0.97 acre of native vegetation is required to be retained for the RPUD. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC reviewed this petition at their December 15, 2016 meeting. Three (3) members of the public came forward to speak in opposition. The first speaker, Mr. Brown, was concerned about traffic and the dimensions of the water management areas. The second speaker, Mr. Lyons, was concerned about traffic and landscaping. The third speaker, Mr. Campoamor, was concerned about traffic, the project’s proposed density, and building height. Commissioner Schmitt made a motion to approve, which was seconded by Commissioner Chrzanowski. The vote to approve was unanimous (6-0), contingent upon the applicant making minor changes to the PUD Document and Master Plan, which are reflected in the attached Ordinance. The minor changes included the elimination of gatehouses and recreational uses from accessory uses in Exhibit A, changes to the Development Standards table in Exhibit B, and the elimination of redundant information on both the Master Plan as well as in Exhibit F. Notwithstanding the unanimous recommendation to approve by the CCPC, there was opposition to this petition; therefore, the petition is placed on Advertised Public Hearings. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site specific rezone from an A Zoning District to a RPUD Zoning District for a project to be known as the Hamilton Place RPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for RPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed RPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may 9.A Packet Pg. 37 01/24/2017 include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with RPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed RPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested RPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relat ion to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot (“reasonably”) be used in accordance 9.A Packet Pg. 38 01/24/2017 with existing zoning? (a “core” question…) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed RPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code Ch.106, Art. II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the RPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at t he Board hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney’s Office. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and recommends that the Board approve the applicant’s request to rezone to the RPUD zoning district. Prepared by: Eric L. Johnson, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner, Zoning Division, Growth Management Department ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Attachment 1 - Staff Report (PDF) 2. Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance (PDF) 3. [Linked] Attachment 3 - Application and Support Material (PDF) 4. Attachment 4 - FLUE Consistency Review (PDF) 5. Attachment 5 - Density Map (PDF) 6. Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (PDF) 7. Attachment 7 - Items from Court Reporter (PDF) 8. Attachment 8 - Legal Notifications (PDF) 9. Legal Ad - Agenda ID 2494 (PDF) 9.A Packet Pg. 39 01/24/2017 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.A Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing t he zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Hamilton Place RPUD to allow development of up to 66 single-family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.75+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ- PL20160001255] Meeting Date: 01/24/2017 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Eric Johnson 12/19/2016 5:09 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 12/19/2016 5:09 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 12/20/2016 9:21 AM Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Division Reviewer Completed 12/20/2016 11:34 AM Zoning Michael Bosi Additional Reviewer Completed 12/22/2016 12:15 PM Growth Management Department Jeanne Marcella Level 2 Division Administrator Completed 12/27/2016 11:16 AM Growth Management Department James French Additional Reviewer Completed 12/27/2016 6:27 PM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 12/28/2016 1:35 PM County Attorney's Office Scott Teach Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 12/28/2016 5:25 PM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 01/03/2017 11:14 AM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 01/03/2017 11:37 AM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 01/16/2017 9:42 AM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 01/24/2017 9:00 AM 9.A Packet Pg. 40 PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 1 of 13 December 5, 2016 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2016 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20160001255 HAMILTON PLACE RPUD ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owners: Applicant (Contract Purchaser): Maria Santos Edmund and Betty Poore WCI Communities, LLC 2316 Andrew Drive 7025 Nighthawk Drive 24301 Walden Center Drive Naples, FL 34112 Naples, FL 34105 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Elfrieda H Sutherland Trust Agent: c/o Gayle Ann Durrance 2076 Sagebrush Circle D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Naples, FL 34120 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Ray Bonita Springs, FL 34134 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition seeks to rezone the property to RPUD to allow for the development of up to sixty-six (66) single-family and/or multi-family dwelling units on 9.75± acres. (See location map on page 2) 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) Airport-Pulling RD NLivingston RDPine Ridge RD I-75 LIVINGSTON ROADKENSINGTON HIGH STREETEATONWO OD LANE LIVINGSTON ROADGOODEARTH DRIVEBRYNWOO D PRESERVE L ANE BRYNWOOD WAYKENSINGTON HIGH STLIVINGSTON ROADBISCAYNE COURT B IS C AY N E CO URTAVIANO DRIVESERRANO CIRCLE SERRANO CIRCLESERRANO CIRC LE R AF FI NA CO U RT PH 1 24 23 22 TR D21 20 19 TRACT 818 17TRACT GC1 TR16C 15 14 F 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3F2 1 TRACT R 1 2G3 TRACT 7 4 5 6 7 8 9 TRACT A10 TRACT A TRACT RCONSERVATION AREA P - 1TRACT B 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 TRACT B22 PH I WELLINGTON PLAC E ATKENSINGTON I C OND O TRACT E PHXIII PH VI TR C-1TRACT P-3 TRACT R TRACT P-1 TRACT C-2TR P-5 TRACT P-2TRACT P-1 TRACTE TRACT P-2 TRACT RTRACT L-1 TRACT L-1 TRACT F TRACT D Tract L-2 TRACT A TRACT P-1TRA CT P -2TRACT P-3 TRACT P-4 TR W-3 CONSERVATIONEASEMENTOR 4049 PG 2808 POSITANO PLACE BLDG 100 BLDG 200BLDG 1400BLDG 1500PGD ABLD G 1300BLDG 1200AT N APLES I CO NDO POSITANO PLACE AT N APLES II C OND OPGD BBLDG 1100BLDG 1000 BLD G 800BLDG 600BLDG 900BLDG 700POSITANOPLACEAT N APLESIII CONDO PGD DB L D G 3 0 0 BLDG 400 B L DG 5 0 0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV C ONDO PGD CFIRST NATIONALBANK CENTERCOMMERCIALCONDO OR 2854 PG 1408À1 À1 À3À1À2 À24 À1.1 À23 À22 À1À21 À1À20 À19 À18 À17 À16 À1À15 À14 À13 À66À67À12 À11 À10 À9 À8 À7 À6 X35 À5 À4 À3 À2 À1 À1 À1 À2 À3 À4 À1 X206 À5 À6 À1À7 À8 À9 À10 X32 X45 À85 X13.1À10À11À12À15À16À17À14À13À5À6À9À8À7À4À18À84 À1 À83 À82 X13.2 À1 À81 À80 À79 À19À20 X13.3À21À22À23À24À26À25À30À29À28À27À78À31À34À33À32 À77 À76 À48À44À47À46À45À43À41À42À40À39À36À37À35À38 À49 À75 X13 À1À74 À73 À1 À72 À71 À65 À70 À50À51À52À53À54À55À60À64À56À58À57À61À63À62À59 À69 À68 X41 X35X42X43 X23 À11 À12 À13 À14 À15 À16 À17 À18 À1 À19 À20 À21 À22 À3 X213 X39 À1 À2 À3 À51 À52 À53 À54 À55 À56 À57 À58 À74 À75 À76 À77 À78 À79 À80À81À82À83À84À85À86À87À88 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À12À13À14À15À16À17À18 À19 À20 À21 À22 À23 À24 À25 À26 À27 À28 À29 À30 À31 À32 À33 À34 À35 À36 À37 À38 À39 À40 À41 À42 À43 À44 À45 À46 À47 À48 À49 À50 À51 À52 À53 À54 À55 À56 À57 À102 À103 À104 À105 À121À122À123À124 À125 À126 À127 À128 À129 À130 À131 À132 À133 À134 À135 À136 À137 À138 À139 À140 À141 À142 À143 À144 À148À149À150À151 À152 À153 À154 À155 À156 À157 À158 À159 À160 À161 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1À1 X53 X54 X55 X56 X218 X216 CU V V PU-b PUD PUD PUD P PUD CPUD PUD CFPUD PUD CPUD RSF-5(0.4) PUD PUD CPUD A PUD CPUD A MPUD BALDRIDGERELATEDGROUP BRYNWOODPRESERVE EVANSCPUD BALMORAL PINEVIEW KENSINGTONPARK HIWASSE ARLINGTONLAKES PINE RIDGECENTER PINE RIDGECENTER WEST NAPLESCHURCH OFCHRIST AVOWHOSPICE BRYNWOODCENTER Location Map Zoning Map Petition Number: PL-2016-1255 PROJEC TLOCATION SITELOCATION ¹ Docu ment Path: M:\GIS_Requests\2016\07-July\7-07-20 16 PL201 60001255\workspace\site-location.mxd 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 3 of 13 December 5, 2016 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: The subject project proposes a density of 6.77 dwelling units per acre (DU/AC). This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding boundaries of the Hamilton Place RPUD: North: Single-family residential, zoned Brynwood Preserve PUD (5.47 DU/AC) East: Residential, zoned Arlington Lakes PUD (6.0 DU/AC) South: Multi-family residential (condomimums), zoned Arlington Lakes PUD (6.0 DU/AC) West: Right-of-way for Livingston Road, farther west is vacant commercial, zoned Hiwasse CPUD (291,000 square feet) Aerial (County GIS) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The property is also located within a mile of the Pine Ridge Road - I- 75 Mixed Use Activity Center (MUAC #10). 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 4 of 13 December 5, 2016 The FLUE provision for the Density Rating System states, If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be added. The density band around a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map and shall not apply within the Estates Designation or for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area. More than fifty percent (50%) of the project is located within the density band, so the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. The FLUE Consistency Review provides a more comprehensive analysis of how the proposed project is consistent with the relative objectives and policies of the GMP (see Attachment 3 – FLUE Consistency Review). In short, the proposed RPUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2014 and 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states, The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 5 of 13 December 5, 2016 c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways. The proposed rezoning to allow a maximum of sixty-six (66) multi-family units on the subject property that will generate approximately 43 PM peak hour, peak direction trips on the immediately adjacent roadway link, Livingston Road. Livingston Road is a six-lane divided facility and has a current service volume of 3,100 trips, with a remaining capacity of approximately 1,624 trips between Pine Ridge Road/Golden Gate Parkway, and is currently at LOS B as shown in the 2015 AUIR. Please note at the time of writing this report the 2016 AUIR was not yet adopted by the Board of County Commissioners (Board); however, staff reviewed this road segment for the CCPC’s consideration, finding a remaining capacity of 1,594 trips and the same LOS B. Staff, therefore, finds that the proposed project does not significantly impact the adjacent roadway links, and there is sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the five (5)-year transportation planning period. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). A minimum of 0.97 acre of native vegetation is required to be retained for the RPUD. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to or amend RPUDs shall be in the form of an RPUD Master Plan of development, along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The RPUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 6 of 13 December 5, 2016 or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning Services Analysis.” In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD Document to address environmental concerns. The location of the preserve was selected to retain the highest quality wetlands on-site and to provide connectivity to existing preserves and flowways on neighboring properties to the east. No listed species of wildlife were observed on the property. Air plants (Tillandsia) have been observed on cypress trees within the RPUD and will be retained or relocated in accordance with the requirements LDC Section 3.04.03. This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Landscape Review: The Master Plan shows that a fifteen (15)-foot wide Type “B” Buffer is proposed along the project’s north property line, except in areas depicted as preserve, such as in the northeast corner of the site as well as along the RPUD’s entire eastern boundary. A thirty (30)-foot wide access easement runs along the entire southern property boundary. As such, the south landscape buffer, proposed just north of this access easement, is depicted as either a fifteen (15)-foot wide Type “A” Buffer or a ten (10)-foot wide Type “B” Buffer, depending on how the subject project is developed. A twenty (20)-foot wide Type “D” Buffer is proposed along Livingston Road. Each single-family lot is required to provide at least one (1) canopy tree. The proposed right-of- way will be wide enough to accommodate trees in connection with a street tree program pursuant to LDC Section 4.06.05.A.1 if it is determined that the lot sizes and building setbacks do not provide enough room to accommodate the requisite trees. It should be noted, however, that this type of detailed analysis to ensure compliance with the LDC will appropriately occur during a subsequent development process. School District: At this time there is sufficient capacity within the elementary and middle concurrency service areas and in an adjacent high school concurrency service area of the proposed development. At the time of SDP or platting, the project will be evaluated for school concurrency. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Utilities Review: Water and wastewater service will be provided by the Collier County Water- Sewer District, which has adequate public utility facilities readily available along Livingston Rd. All water distribution and wastewater collection systems shall be conveyed to the District. County Utility Easements shall be dedicated for all utility facilities to be owned, operated, and maintained by the District. Design, construction, and conveyance of the utility facilities shall conform to current Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures. Applicable system development charges and connection fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 7 of 13 December 5, 2016 Zoning Services Review: Staff analyzed the proposed uses and associated development standards. The abutting development to the north, Brynwood Preserve PUD, has been developed with single- family detached dwellings. The PUD Document for this PUD also allows for two-family dwellings and multi-family dwellings. To the south and east, the Arlington Lakes PUD allows single-family detached dwellings, single-family attached dwellings, zero-lot-line, patio dwellings, and multi- family dwellings. The Arlington Lakes PUD also allows Group Care Facilities (category I and II), care units, nursing homes, and the like. The uses proposed in the Hamilton Place RPUD (i.e., single-family detached, single-family attached, single-family variable lot line, and multi-family dwellings) are comparable and compatible to the uses approved in the aforementioned PUDs. With respect to development standards, staff evaluated the standards of the proposed RPUD and compared them with the standards of the Brynwood Preserve PUD and the Arlington Lakes PUD. The Brynwood Preserve PUD has been developed with single-family detached homes. The Arlington Lakes PUD to the south has been developed with condominium buildings. Staff determined the proposed development standards are comparable and compatible with the development standards of the aforementioned PUDs. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject site fronts on Livingston Road. Water and wastewater facilities are located within the right-of-way, and each has enough capacity to serve the proposed RPUD. Drainage solutions would be evaluated in connection with SDP/platting and construction permits. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report (or within an accompanying memorandum). 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 8 of 13 December 5, 2016 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Analysis section of this staff report, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least sixty percent (60%) of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies, to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. No deviations are proposed in connection with this request to rezone to RPUD. 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 9 of 13 December 5, 2016 Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable”: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. There are no other RPUDs located within the immediate vicinity of the subject property; however, the proposed project relates well to the surrounding projects, particularly those containing residential land uses. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The rectangular shape boundary of the RPUD logically follows the external boundary of the parcels assembled for the rezoning. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed RPUD is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 10 of 13 December 5, 2016 Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed rezoning request for up to sixty-six (66) residential units is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area, provided the project’s stormwater management system is designed to discharge into the Whippoorwill Flowway. Stormwater Best Management Practices, treatment, and storage on this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting with the South Florida Water Management District, and County staff will evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, including stormwater calculations, at time of SDP and/or plat. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated this RPUD would reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The Hiwasse CPUD is currently vacant and staff does not anticipate this proposed RPUD would serve as a deterrent to its improvement. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 11 of 13 December 5, 2016 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed design standards cannot be achieved without rezoning to an RPUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff’s opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the RPUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the RPUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no impact on public facility adequacy in regard to utilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) PUDZ-PL20160001255 Hamilton Place RUPD Page 12 of 13 December 5, 2016 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on September 27, 2016 at the Naples Church of Christ in Naples, Florida. The meeting commenced at 5:37 p.m. and ended at approximately 6:11 p.m. The NIM meeting minutes are included in Attachment 2 – Application and Support Material. Many of the questions dealt with the proposed density, buffering, recreation/amenities, and location of access point. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report on November 28, 2016. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval. Attachments: 1) Proposed Ordinance 2) Application and Support Material 3) FLUE Consistency Review 4) Density Map 5) Legal Notifications 6) Emails_Letters from Public 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) P】u〕PARED BY: ERIC JO ,AICP,CFM,PRINCIPAL PLANNER /1る DATE REVIEWED BY: /1'乙 ′`だ DATE It-?z-It,MIKE BOSI,AICP,DIFECTOR ZONING DIVISION PUDZ―PL20160001255 Ham∥ton P!ace RUPD DATE /ューノ″/4 DATE rcA la DATE RAYMO VISION ,ZONING MANAGER APPROVED BY: FttNCH,DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGENIIENT DEPARTMENT DAVID S.WHjKISON DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Page 13 of13 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Staff Report (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) Growth Management Department Zoning Division C O N S I S T E N C Y R E V I E W M E M O R A N D U M To: Eric Johnson, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Services Section From: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section Date: November 8, 2016 Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review (2nd memo) PETITION NUMBER: PL-20160001255 ‒ REV: 2 PETITION NAME: Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). REQUEST: To rezone a ±9.75-acre property from the A, Agricultural zoning district to the Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development to allow residential development (up to 66 multi-family or single-family units) with associated amenities (recreational uses) and open space uses. LOCATION: The ±9.75-acre property is located approximately one-half mile south of Pine Ridge Road, on the east side of Livingston Road, south of the Brynwood Preserve and north of Positano Place at Naples (AKA Arlington Lakes) residential PUDs, in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict), as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The property is also located within a mile of the Pine Ridge Road – I-75 Mixed Use Activity Center (MUAC #10). Relative to this petition, the Urban Residential Subdistrict allows residential uses at a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre (DU/A). Also, as explained below, this site is eligible for a 3 DU/A density bonus for mostly lying within the residential density band surrounding Activity Center #10, yielding a total eligible density of 7 DU/A. and is eligible for a 3 DU/A density bonus for lying within the residential density band surrounding Activity Center #10, yielding a total eligible density of 7 DU/A). FLUE provisions for the Density Rating System state, “If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be added. The density band around a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map and shall not apply within the Estates Designation or for properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area”. More than 50% of the project is within the density band, so the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. This PUD provides for residential uses at a density of 6.77 DU/A, recreational uses and open space. The Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new developments to be compatible with the surrounding land area. [Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. However, staff notes that in reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/intensities on the subject site, the compatibility analysis is to be comprehensive and include a review of both the subject property and surrounding or nearby properties with r egard to allowed use 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Attachment 4 - FLUE Consistency Review (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location, traffic generation/attraction, etc.] In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their prope rties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [This site fronts Livingston Road, a minor arterial roadway. Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan, depicts a single, direct access to Livingston Road.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan, depicts a private hammer-head cul-de-sac street inside the project. All vehicular traffic accesses Livingston Road directly at a single access point.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [The site abuts a road on one side ‒ Livingston Road on the west. Properties located to the north and south are fully developed, with no interconnection points proposed. A preserve area inside the Arlington Lakes PUD abuts the site along the east side, where no interconnection is proposed.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [As to walkable communities, the PUD does not request Deviations from the Land Development Code (LDC). The project will be subject to LDC requirements for provision of sidewalks. Non-vehicular interconnections are not proposed with the abutting properties. Pedestrian/bike connections are provided to Livingston Road. As to a blend of densities and a range of housing prices and types, the PUD provides single-family detached & attached, multi-family and single-family flexible lot line residences. Common open spaces and civic facilities are provided by more than 4.5 acres of open space including water management lakes, recreational/amenity areas and other open spaces.] Based upon the above analysis, the proposed PUD may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: Michael Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows, Manager, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section G: Comp\Consistency Reviews\2016 G:\CDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews\2016\PUDZ\PUDZ-PL2016-1255 Hamilton Place R2 drft.docx. 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Attachment 4 - FLUE Consistency Review (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) p 0 300 600 900150 FeetLivingston Rd PUD CPUD PUD PUD CPUD RSF-5 (0,4) A CPUD Zo n in g : PUD CPUD Kensington High STAviano DR Kraf t L N Bisca yn e CT Serrano CIRCarrington CIR Positano CIR Brynwood WAYReserve CTViolino LNSt r at f or d CTR a f f i n a C T Zoning: PUD Zoning: PUD Zoning: PUD Zoning: PUD Zoning: MPUD Zoning: A Zoning: CFPUD GROSS DENSITY UNITS PER ACRE (UPA) FOR HAMILTON PLACE CPUD AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ³ SUBJECT PROPERTY:HAMILTON PLACE RPUD Density:1 per 5 ac. Kensington ParkDensity:1.54 Arlington LakesDensity:6.0 BalmoralDensity:4.0 Related GroupDensity:6.99 Brynwood PreserveDensity:5.47 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Attachment 5 - Density Map (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Steve <VirtualNeff@outlook.com> Sent:Thursday, December 22, 2016 12:25 PM To:JohnsonEric Cc:carriefilthaut@centurylink.net Subject:Hamilton Place Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Thank you for your consideration, Stephen & Maria Neff 1681 Serrano Circle Naples, Florida 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Vigilante Family <familyvigilante@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, December 21, 2016 7:07 PM To:JohnsonEric Cc:Carrie J. Filthaut Subject:Hamilton Place Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards, Anthony & Kathleen Vigilante 1419 Serrano Circle Naples, FL 34105 239-567-9800 FamilyVigilante@gmail.com 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Debra Neal <debran42@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 20, 2016 8:21 PM To:JohnsonEric Cc:carrie Filthaut Subject:Arlington Lakes Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards, Debra Neal 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Jerry Ferguson <fergiforms@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:53 PM To:JohnsonEric Cc:Carrie J. Filthaut (carriefilthaut@centurylink.net) Subject:Hamilton Place Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’. Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards, However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards, Jerry Ferguson 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Peter Garbarino <peter@simplejane.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:50 PM To:JohnsonEric Cc:carriefilthaut@centurylink.net Subject:Hamilton Place development Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards, Peter Garbarino 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Rumley, Jeffrey <JRumley@bcbsm.com> Sent:Friday, December 09, 2016 9:45 AM To:JohnsonEric Cc:paulg@sandcastlecm.com Subject:Hamilton Place RPUD-Dec 15th Hearing Good Morning Mr. Johnson: I am presently a Michigan resident with a seasonal home at Brynwood Preserve anticipating full time Florida residency. I am unable to be present at the scheduled Dec 15th hearing but wanted to take the opportunity to express a concern I have. One of the primary reasons I purchased a home in Brynwood was because of the privacy it afforded from adjacent properties. The preserve, of course, presents one insulator and there appears to be a sufficient barrier between our association’s homes on the north side from the commercial properties at Pine Ridge and Livingston Rd. My concern is the sufficiency of the proposed barrier between Hamilton Place and the south side of Brynwood Preserve Association. The site plan provided by the builder makes reference to a “Type B” barrier. I do not know what that is and how it is distinguished from the Type A or D barriers proposed on the road side of Hamilton or the south side of Hamilton. In any event, a substantial part of the value proposition of Brynwood is the interior lakes and surrounding natural habitat. I do not object to the construction of tasteful residential units on adjoining property. What I do want to see though is an appropriately deep boundary that preserves as much as possible the natural surroundings. This is not only a value to the residents of Brynwood but also a value that should be recognized by putative purchasers of Hamilton Place residences. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Jeffrey Rumley 12858 Brynwood Preserve Lane The information contained in this communication is highly confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom this communication is directed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended receipt and delete the original message without making any copies. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan are nonprofit corporations and independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Nicola Vincent <VincentN@rollsecure.com> Sent:Friday, December 09, 2016 8:35 AM To:JohnsonEric Subject:Please DO NOT APPROVE Hamilton Place RPUD Mr Johnson, My name is Nicola Vincent and I reside at 12873 Brynwood Way in Naples. I am extremely opposed to Hamilton Place RPUD. I purchased my home in Brynwood Preserve almost 7 years ago because I found it to be a quiet little neighborhood. My home is at the end of the street and with only one neighbor it offers a lot of privacy which added to my decision. That is unless they build this monstrosity of a neighborhood next door to me, then I can say “bye bye” to my private, quiet, peaceful home. Not only will I have new homes next door in what I considered a preserve (hence the name Brynwood Preserve) but they will stare directly into my home. Not only will I have to put up with annoying construction all day for the foreseeable future, once done I will go from having one neighbor to several overnight. It will also drastically decrease my property value. All the above is just the affect to me personally. Building this new neighborhood will also have a catastrophic effect to traffic. If you come from Pine Ridge heading into Brynwood Preserve, we have to make a U-turn at Kensington/ Postitano to get home. The new neighborhood would be the same. Please, go check this out at 5pm any weekday, it’s a nightmare. Traffic is already backed up something awful, I honestly don’t know how there are no accidents most days, let’s not add a whole neighborhood of extra drivers to that mess. While I will try my best to attend the meeting on December 15th, I work so I am not sure I will be able to. Please, Please DO NOT approve this new development. Leave some trees, some preserve, some nature in this town! Thank you for your time, Nicola Vincent 12873 Brynwood Way Naples, FL 34109 Nicola Vincent 239-594-1616 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 2 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Frank Philipone <frankphilipone@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, December 08, 2016 5:55 PM To:JohnsonEric Subject:Fwd: ***Update to Hamilton Place Information*** Hamilton Place Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Frank Campoamor <frankcampoamor@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, December 07, 2016 5:55 PM To:JohnsonEric Subject:Opposition Letter - Hamilton Place RPUD Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a property owner in the adjoining neighborhood, Brynwood Preserve (12856 Brynwood Way, Naples, FL 34105). I live there year-round and work full-time in Naples. I am very concerned about the effects that Hamilton Place will have on the existing, adjoining neighborhoods and traffic on Livingston Road. 1. It is already extremely difficult and dangerous to access Brynwood Preserve heading south on Livingston Road and having to do a U-turn at the median cut through where Positano Place and the back entrance to Kensington are located. It is already a mess, and I have seen road rage incidents occur with the existing 3 neighborhoods trying to use that median cut through. Adding a fourth neighborhood with 66 units, which could realistically mean another 100 cars, would be dangerous to the existing residents and unfair. 2. Then accessing Brynwood Preserve heading north on Livingston Road will be equally dangerous because the ingress and egress for Hamilton Place will be right next to where the turn in is for Brynwood Preserve. That is accidents waiting to happen. It is my understanding that entrances to neighborhoods need to be 660 feet apart. The proposed entrance for Hamilton Place will violate that ordinance because its entrance is less than 660 feet from the entrances of both Brynwood Preserve and Positano Place. 3. The proposed density is too great. The land under consideration is just too tight to put the density in there being proposed when you already have Brynwood Preserve to the north and Positano Place to the south. 4. The proposed vegetation barrier between Brynwood Preserve and Hamilton Place is wholly inadequate. Not only will it not act as a sufficient sound barrier, the proposed height of the structures will leave no privacy to our community and their community. Further, there should be more of a buffer distance between the homes in Brynwood Preserve and the residences proposed for Hamilton place. In my opinion, the vacant land between Brynwood Preserve and Positano Place is unfit for the development being proposed. It just does not make sense, will put the residents of the adjoining neighborhoods and general public using Livingston Road in danger from a traffic standpoint, and does not provide adequate barriers between the adjoining neighborhoods. Thank you for your consideration. Frank Campoamor Owner in Brynwood Preserve 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Marcia Azar <marciaazar@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, December 05, 2016 10:44 AM To:JohnsonEric Cc:Carrie Subject:Hamilton Place Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards, Marcia Azar Sent from my iPhone 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Joan Kellner <jk349@comcast.net> Sent:Sunday, December 04, 2016 7:12 PM To:JohnsonEric Subject:PUDZ-PL20160001255 - Submission against Hamilton Place Zoning change Attachments:Letter to CCPC regarding Hamilton Place zoning request 12-04-2016.docx Mr. Johnson; I am respectfully submitting this email communication as I will be unable to attend the hearing scheduled for Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 9:00am. This communication was transmitted on December 4, 2016 – in excess of the stated 7 days required as per the notice I received. I ask that a receipt be forwarded to me (email is acceptable), that this communication has been received in a timely manner and will be submitted into the final package of documents to be considered by the CCPC concerning this zoning request. Thank you Joan Kellner 12860 Brynwood Way Naples FL 34105 Jk349@comcast.net 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) DATE: December 4, 2016 TO: Collier County Planning Commission FROM: Joan I. Kellner RE: Zoning Proposal PUDZ-PL20160001255 – Hamilton Place In accordance with the notification I received dated November 23, 2016; pertaining to the public hearing scheduled for 9:00am, Thursday, December 15, 2016 for consideration of: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulation for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Hamilton Place RPUD to allow development of up to 66 single family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.75+/- acres, and by providing an effective date. {PUDZ- PL20160001255}. Please find the following: I am a permanent, full-time resident of Brynwood Preserve, the development located just north of the subject property. My property is located approximately at the midpoint along the southern border of my association and would be directly affected by the proposed zoning change and subsequent development. I have attended the community information meeting which was held on September 27, 2016. In essence, this meeting did not provide much information as at the time no final plans had been set. There were also concerned residents from Andalucía and Positano Place, two other communities which share borders with the subject property. At the time of this meeting, the developers were not able to provide specifics on the allocation of building types (Single detached, Single attached, Multi-Family) or the projected sales price ranges of the proposed units. Even the size of the units was not available for discussion. This concerns me as a neighbor to the proposed development since the type and size of unit will dictate market pricing and in turn could have an adverse effect on the value of my property. For example, Brynwood preserve has 85, single detached homes, both one and two story with floor plans between ~1,900-~2,300sf. Houses in the association are currently begin marketed and sold from the mid-$400M to low $500M. If the new units being built adjacent to our property are less than 1,500sf, and are considered more condo/apartment styled – the overall market value per unit will be substantially less and could adversely affect the market prices in the immediate geographic area. The contiguous developments: Brynwood, Andalucía, Positano; were constructed between 2003 and 2016 and have residential density ratios of under 6:1. The proposed development is in excess of this ratio, and although the County regulations allow up to 7:1, I feel that the final density should not exceed the lowest of the contiguous parcels. 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) Why you may ask? The proposed building parcel is much smaller than its neighbors – with a 66 proposed units (in combination of single detached, single attached, and multifamily units) on 9.75 acres with two proposed water retention areas, a community area with a common area pool, tennis/pickle ball and basketball court areas, a community building and related roadways. By comparison: Brynwood contains 29 acres and has 85 single family homes. Each home is approximately 1/6 (.16) of an acre. There are essentially three floor plans of one or two story construction. The remaining space is occupied by retention lakes, roadway, preserve area and some common area walk/jogging paths along the western edge. Andalucía has 78 acres with 167 single family homes. Other land use is in retention lakes, preserve areas, roadways and a community center with a pool, pay area and common building amenities. Positano Place is a condominium association with 330 units in 15 building (22 units per building) with three story construction. The property is divided into four smaller neighborhood associations and each pay toward common amenities such as the community center, a pool and roadways. With the exception of Positano, none of the closest developments to any of these properties (Aviano, Kensington, Stratford Place etc.) do not exceed two stories. And should not – if only for aesthetic purposes. There are no other three-story buildings in the immediate area other than commercial. Also – in a quick aerial view of the surrounding developments – there are significant areas of vacant/non-developed land which surround each development – in the form of preserves, environmentally protected areas and outright vacant land. There is little to no “line of sight” contact between developments. Permitting this construction would not only increase the density of the area, but contaminate the views of the owners of units along the borders of this property which were a major deciding factor in the purchase of these units and making them more desirable within the communities as reflected by sales and purchase prices. Developing this property will have an adverse effect on the market value of the closest units of the adjacent communities and a decreased enjoyment of these properties by the owners. Not only visual, but auditory issues will result. As I mentioned earlier, I am located on the southern side of Brynwood Preserve – approximately halfway along the length of the subject property. At this time with the full width of the property vacant and heavily vegetated, sounds from Positano Place (located to the south of the subject property) pervade to our side of the association. Noises include car traffic, car alarms and closing doors, loud talking from the residents at Positano. Most recently the cries of victory from Chicago fans at the end of the 7th game of the World Series this past November could be heard. I cannot imagine the additional noise that will be generated from 66 units between us (Positano and Brynwood) in the form of human interaction, general building noise (air handler/compressor units, pool pumps, garage doors, entry doors), entertainment areas (common pool, tennis or basketball courts) and general traffic. I cannot imagine that the proposed vegetation and/or water management areas that are proposed will be able to alleviate the noise contamination when a fully wooded/vegetative area cannot. I feel that I can categorically state that the proposed vegetation; 15’ of Type B along the northern border and 10’ of Type A along the southern border will not be a sufficient for either bordering neighborhood. If this plan were to be approved I would argue for the need of a significant wall barrier in addition to heavier vegetation planting to attempt to muffle the increase in noise. 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) The proposed development also allows for a water management area along the property line it shares with Brynwood. At the meeting previously noted, participants were informed that this will be @40’ in width (from north to south) and extend along the residential construction, approximately 800’- 850’along the shared property line. Currently there is no formal run-off for water to this area which will require the construction of a “canal” or other such structure to contain excess rainwater and run-off from the adjacent parcels (I’m assuming that this will include water flow from individual building gutters, possible pool overflows, drainage from the interior roadway etc.). I’m concerned about the capacity of the basin, purge capability, and water flow/stagnation issues that could result in overflow to adjacent areas or mosquito or other insect larvae production so close to my home. At this time we do not have a problem with drainage on this side of the property or adverse insect population effects but any significant change in the ecosystem or topography of the immediate area could have negative effects. Additionally, noise is a concern for us along our roadway and as sound carries quickly without reduced decibel levels across a liquid surface more readily than through a heavily vegetated area – all sounds generated from Hamilton Place will be in excess of the levels currently heard from Positano. Residents at Andalucía had voiced their concern about the water management area at the rear of the project – their development has already experienced problems with drainage in the preserve areas and fear that additional water containment structures nearby will exacerbate their current issue. The proposed construction includes moving the current driveway access from the southwest to the northwest corner of the property – nearly in alignment with the “slip” lane which originates just north of our property line on Livingston Road for access to Brynwood’s entry. Not only do I believe that the proximity of these two driveway features will inherently create a heightened accident zone for residents of Brynwood and Hamilton Place, but that Positano will also be adversely affected in their ability to access Livingston Road easily. From personal experience, I normally access Brynwood by travelling southward on Livingston and make the U-turn where Positano and Kensington entrances are across from one another. The knowledge of right-of-way eludes most drivers in the best of circumstances but adding another property access into the immediate area will only increase the likelihood of collision from entrance and egress of these properties as well as drivers travelling on Livingston Road itself. Additionally, the location of the proposed entrance will cause an increase of vehicles taking this U-turn to access the subject property. The current slip/turn lane located southbound on Livingston will most likely need to be elongated to support additional vehicles waiting to make this turn. Also, we were informed at the information meeting that there is a County requirement of 660ft between driveways/entrances. The location of the Hamilton Place PUD entrance will be less than 660ft from both Positano Place and Brynwood Preserve roadways, requiring TWO variances solely for driveway placement. Obviously this narrow parcel is not conducive for a high-access development. As you are aware, WCI Communities Inc. is the current developer of record and has a relatively strong record for building quality construction in this market and others. However, in September 2016, WCI entered into a merger agreement with Lennar Homes Inc. Lennar will be the lead company and WCI will become essentially a branding name with no management or decision-making authority. Lennar, unlike WCI, does not have the same name in the construction business and instead has a high incidence of consumer complaints with construction quality and warranties/guaranties – all of which can be viewed via multiple BBB listings – complaints are organized by geographic area on the website. Furthermore, in on November 30, 2016, a WCI shareholder has filed suit against the proposed merger – with further details to be found via any internet search engine. 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) In summary, I am submitting my concerns, which affect numerous residents in three neighborhoods contiguous with the proposed development. I hope that these arguments will bear consideration from the Board who are also residents of Naples and purchased their homes with consideration of proximity of other developments and the related auditory and visual benefits as well as ease of access from major local roadways. Furthermore, while I understand that development is inevitable, I do not believe that a higher density project should be approved in the midst of three completed projects that are lower in density. The developer has submitted this multi-story, high density plan as it is likely not financially feasible for them develop it similarly to the two adjacent parcels of Brynwood or Andalucía which are of lower density and do not contain multi-family units. If it is developed along the scope of Positano – the property values for the units of Brynwood that face this project will decline as it will not be favorably viewed by future owners. Respectfully I submit my concerns and views of this project to the Board. I ask that if approval is granted, that additional concerns and consideration for the following will be addressed: • A solid wall barrier along the shared property lines, or • Extended vegetation coverage in excess of the proposed plan. • A two-story limit on all construction heights. • A density level not to exceed the existing surrounding parcels of less than 6:1. • An alternate plan for entrance/egress to the property. • Extensive review of water retention areas and proposed management as well as geologic and environmental impact on adjacent parcels. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely; Joan I Kellner 12860 Brynwood Way Naples FL 34105 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:djosephmail@gmail.com on behalf of David Joseph <david@naplesluxurygroup.com> Sent:Sunday, December 04, 2016 10:04 AM To:JohnsonEric Subject:Hamilton Place Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards Please click HERE to visit the Andalucia Homeowners Association web site. 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Julie <jvadas35@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, December 04, 2016 3:46 PM To:JohnsonEric Cc:Carrie Filthaut Subject:Hamilton Place Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limiting the building height to 3 stories or less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards, Julie Mehler 1469 Serrano Circle Please click HERE to visit the Andalucia Homeowners Association web site. 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Vicki Mach <william.mach@frontier.com> Sent:Saturday, December 03, 2016 12:19 PM To:JohnsonEric Cc:Carrie Filthaut Subject:Hamilton Place Dear Mr. Johnson, We are homeowners in Andalucia. We are one of the 7 homes most affected, as our home is directly behind the proposed Hamilton Place Development. We bought our lot specifically because of the privacy it afforded, due to being a preserve lot. We have concerns of privacy and noise due to the current proposal. We were not able to attend the October informational meeting, but we did contact Sharon Upenhour at Grady Minor. It is our understanding, after talking with her, that W CI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’.and that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is our understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, we would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep us apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Regards, Bill and Vicki Mach 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Ana Tereza <ana_avellar@hotmail.com> Sent:Saturday, December 03, 2016 1:00 PM To:JohnsonEric Subject:Request Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards, Ana Munro 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Sandra Raseta <sraseta@aol.com> Sent:Saturday, December 03, 2016 11:51 PM To:JohnsonEric Cc:Carrie J. Filthaut Subject:HamiltonPlace Mr. Johnson, My husband, George Raseta, and I, Sandra Raseta, moved into our new home here at 1478 Serrano Circle in Andalucia on 12/20/2011. We are full-time residents and have been very happy living here these past 5 years. If you allow the construction of 6.6 units per acre in Hamilton Place, our home will not be as ideal as it has been. I'm sure it is not your intention to make people unhappy to be living in Naples. The best solution would be to locate Hamilton Place elsewhere, somewhere with more room. But if this is "impossible" please try to limit the impact on our environment by reducing the number of units to be squeezed into that slender parcel of land. Thank you. Sandra and George Raseta Sent from my iPad 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Budimir Zvolanek <budajz68@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, December 03, 2016 11:27 AM To:JohnsonEric Subject:Hamilton Place development Mr. Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and am writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place development. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October 2016 and at that meeting WCI agreed to limit the building height to 3 stories or less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. I understand that density is based on neighboring developments. I am thus requesting that Hamilton Place be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our Andalucia development where I live. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding the Hamilton Place. Best regards, Budimir (Bud) Zvolanek Homeowner 1340 Andalucia Way Naples, FL 34105 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Carrie J. Filthaut <cjfilthaut@napleslaw.com> Sent:Friday, October 07, 2016 4:45 PM To:JohnsonEric Subject:RE: Hamilton Place RPUD If it helps, I will be happy to collect owner responses via email that back the Association request. Carrie J. Filthaut Real Estate Paralegal Cheffy Passidomo, P.A. 821 5th Avenue South Naples, FL 34102 (239) 436-1519 direct (239) 261-9300 telephone (239) 261-9782 facsimile cjfilthaut@napleslaw.com www.napleslaw.com This e-mail, along with any files transmitted with it, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If this e-mail is not addressed to you (or if you have any reason to believe that it is not intended for you), please notify the sender by return e-mail or by telephoning us (collect) at 239-261-9300 and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any unauthorized review, use, retention, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the law firm. From: JohnsonEric [mailto:EricJohnson@colliergov.net] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 4:42 PM To: Carrie J. Filthaut <cjfilthaut@napleslaw.com> Subject: RE: Hamilton Place RPUD Thank you for your email and comments. I will be sure to include it in the packets that will be reviewed by the decision makers. Respectfully, Eric L. Johnson, AICP, CFM, LEED Green Associate Principal Planner From: Carrie J. Filthaut [mailto:cjfilthaut@napleslaw.com] Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 3:31 PM To: JohnsonEric <EricJohnson@colliergov.net> Cc: Carrie Filthaut <carriefilthaut@centurylink.net> Subject: Hamilton Place RPUD Hi Eric~ 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 2 I am the President of Andalucia Homeowners’ Association and I was at the informational meeting you attended last week regarding Hamilton Place. During that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. I look forward to your response. Kind regards, Carrie J. Filthaut Real Estate Paralegal Cheffy Passidomo, P.A. 821 5th Avenue South Naples, FL 34102 (239) 436-1519 direct (239) 261-9300 telephone (239) 261-9782 facsimile cjfilthaut@napleslaw.com www.napleslaw.com This e-mail, along with any files transmitted with it, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If this e-mail is not addressed to you (or if you have any reason to believe that it is not intended for you), please notify the sender by return e-mail or by telephoning us (collect) at 239-261-9300 and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any unauthorized review, use, retention, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the law firm. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 1 JohnsonEric From:Carrie J. Filthaut <cjfilthaut@napleslaw.com> Sent:Friday, October 07, 2016 3:31 PM To:JohnsonEric Cc:Carrie Filthaut Subject:Hamilton Place RPUD Hi Eric~ I am the President of Andalucia Homeowners’ Association and I was at the informational meeting you attended last week regarding Hamilton Place. During that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35’. However, they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. I look forward to your response. Kind regards, Carrie J. Filthaut Real Estate Paralegal Cheffy Passidomo, P.A. 821 5th Avenue South Naples, FL 34102 (239) 436-1519 direct (239) 261-9300 telephone (239) 261-9782 facsimile cjfilthaut@napleslaw.com www.napleslaw.com This e-mail, along with any files transmitted with it, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If this e-mail is not addressed to you (or if you have any reason to believe that it is not intended for you), please notify the sender by return e-mail or by telephoning us (collect) at 239-261-9300 and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any unauthorized review, use, retention, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the law firm. 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public (as of Dec 22 2016) (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) fix ei I N 14,„ p::, - , n' Z1 t_„/' f HHIOi ' _: x I C. 44;#..',, t,.',"••• ii' .' i.°, 4$'-- --",„, #. l, T kt, 4 41 74 9 t j.: avoHNoisoMnn 1 ,,, 4,_ i' Ai . 1 ,,,„ 0„,,,, . - i 4'''': ''''',-" 4 s yi Z E ' I m : pp 4; t r^.§ ., f 3 '. x a:, S o © f I : I 1 er 4.. e sm x w y g4 2 S 4 k 4X a v K. rt ip i F:?. .' 5Kit #. k a t r"- WM. --' 14. St 40.• 4. — it 4,,. 1,1 4 a - o 18 tit. E tit , , A i aro ' 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Attachment 7 - Items from Court Reporter (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) P ash ' g c ba.... e,. : as sk.,. a.. x. iM+ v f11!€ z w' P rbi. ? =. k f-:,,,,:_- ''''''', ‘. 1 1 r , iii 0IIIIIII f ilk w I it, i 9 1111111, „ 1 1 I . *- 1""" 7". 0,%. ' • Olt 4 mow i ii, r 0. ,,,, ori m R 1• r I 0....; s © Jt ( 4 0 P H LoIC''''":‘ 1 i k , I 11 x d z£ a $ fi4sar` 9— . i r-- - b.' i 3#$ a 1 Y1$ 4., 44.. 4* ''''‘ tkr. i.,., r e it__ * „„_...„," A b . i rd'' ak. 4 a 1,. j,,,,, 1,_ I , a.,., f*. tg *- ' 41,,,::: Vt I'''. ' i 1 . . I 1_ ,,, g, 44 __„ , ,.. k .: ,,,...„. 7. , l rrirr ids - 4:-...,„::,:_, S.,..„._±.-- 4. '* r-''''''''' w _ 6,... 40t- t. , 8., o zo$ w wav P w,,, — xw, ron P, KE Apuo m o, so o zss o,,. n x,. zo,. z, ow 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Attachment 7 - Items from Court Reporter (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) a 1. -- 111iiiiii m t11.zoilir}p x 0 rE rrrrrrw q s t 515 5554551555554i15.--Baa w 555 55555555555555555„, 5,-,. 5s5. 5155- 5555555- 15, 55.-. A,,,,,,.. ..•. `• h momil ''a aka , 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Attachment 7 - Items from Court Reporter (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) ff Vie$ 44„ k Vgg ver,,,.. 9 Y F e .°°°°.:. F1 ttil x t m li 3 i--; - d 4q! t' L. i W.... , Li s„.„,....„.„.. „.,„,..,,,,....,„,„ this.:....,„...„,„,„„ t„,,,,,,. ..„:„... s..„,,,, s iii_ i,..-„,.....,...„„ s, ....„,. ss..„. .„... ..„.., yet mow, s,, r„.„.„:„..„....„„:„.„.„.. „,,,: s„....,,,,, t; a G h-- s„. ,... s: s.„.„:„. 7„,„ .„, ,— tZtZEi",!•;',., E.-- it.-- tt" EA'.. ttr• f"' s". M.?•, L"."•V-- 41'. ' 4''''.... .. Et El• 2 tiitI ift 1.Q y 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Attachment 7 - Items from Court Reporter (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) t P e tie De PPS Be vo," P`'-cf4 rV-t, 3P ) A up 1cr 0.e y"; c PP pe ei lice- K )K pi7) I' A K PPPS 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Attachment 7 - Items from Court Reporter (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) Hamilton Place PUD Adjacent Development Densities PUD Acres Dwelling Units Density Arlington Lakes 98.36 590 6 Brynwood Preserve 29.26 170 5.47 Kensington Park 370 570 1.54 a Related Group 39.5 276 6.99 re Whippoorwill Lakes 76.85 518 6.74 Whippoorwill Pines 29.54 180 6 Whippoorwill Woods 83.92 462 5.51 r. Summerwind 29.6 368 12.43 4 Cypress Glenn 29.70 208 7 Manchester Square 36.90 148 4 Temple Citrus Grove 132.68 512 3.86 Oak Grove 131.30 525 4 Vineyards 1,930.16 5,608 3.02 Citrus Gardens 98.6 396 4.01 Wilshire Lakes 246.41 552 2.24 Balmoral 58.95 236 4 Livingston Village 149 590 3.9 December 13, 2016 Page 1 of 1 GradyMinor co,a1.rszair„ .tsmid',un, ,or> #rann r, Lott ,..;apr ltrhaerTs 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Attachment 7 - Items from Court Reporter (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 18A Monday,November 28,2016 Naples Daily News NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,December 15th,2016,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL.,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] Pine Ridge RD cc 1-75 a 0 Oa Green BLVD C PROJECT en LOCATION Cr) J s All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,December 15th, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252- 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman November 28,2016 ND-1368601 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Attachment 7 - Items from Court Reporter (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 2 y0r OQ c7 v ce- Or r Qo 2to mG .... 3 LaJ 1= w tli,., c -- ta v.... urrN ICa O0* G1 J aZ r7- c, u.... 0 fv---‘,,, S 6 0 2oi•-• Qa o N NoQo; Q • 1 j dmjz o- kir u, j 20 a o 0 v 2 = J rill yom yv, J 0' 4, 1 J` tLIAO C mar DuiZ 0N w' cd 2. 3) 4 v . . r.-: i CvO Q N o Ooo to Ks ot. r- pOv1y °- u- NZ1y U) j c l Zd 2N j No a Z O Qm O oa S O 0 o u1 a " lu' O of) OrrcaZ."(- n vs' t' dce, ' d' pZ o- ovW ° ' o i. retp 00, 2oO t o N dNOcpzu z4. 0 oco z0 "' vs oo ! 3. V O V q= oO v d mo -' ty O Ovl Z 4C. -- d CCE CO v I . NzZp m 0 a za Co OO 12:5 v T C ° LU c rCJ O s CI zo o e i odsu.. ri.. cc 1. 1. 1 z co, rJO ° ii) tow . . O Op = 7o r s'cr, 6 ZZy O Aro e dTrr ~ O2Z 0 rclippcr) OV Y m pr u-% 0 CO oZ r vzoZs III a. o r c c r J v- Q. y r eL 1 J DZ ul Lu2 O J m Z eL c, 2 ZO r 0 J o c _ Juut v O- 1 s' Z r j Z O 0 0 1 2 2 N d r 0 Q m e. 1 N p 0 O N O- , Z ., 1. O j v' 2t V Q S O 2 V cn Z C_ d p T j G 0001 ti Z cr.?, im Q CO a jT y: Zr SCC J Q d OQ ca Z 1 yr 0 R a sA, f' \\ c- Act I- cos z Q 2 c T CO Iii T oY o 15.- G) d Z d Q i 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Attachment 7 - Items from Court Reporter (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) Z tQ CO 3 o co d Q- Z Z . CV 0 y0 v e 4 om94 O r r Z n c, m wm e Omv - f--) qZ cnp G o i) - 4O o0 1 N Z 73 - to w m0 , p..... 0Q cm VI Z0 13, n ro - w Dov TtQ O oo o c o ( D n y Zorn o- a Q- Z Zo Gi C o i Q rn = 0O N m Nmoo N o * 73 O 70v 3 70 omZCO rrt 0. 4 m O ril - O Z Z o 0 NC Nm C) Z o O rrOZOZ Uo p7, 0 o s r1Z.10 - 3 O o oo3 n -.. o U) 0OG eCC c- 4 oOAZ mo Q Orn m y Om, 0 e.Z y 73 - m cn 6, 0 m b 1 m WI - --“ en) —+ cIN k c, v 2 p O o m N orriin p - rn 4. 0 7o m * c 73 37 rn N CA - A c 2 mS N ( LI) u' c 0 v Z n ° Z rG = m 3 0 v - n ` C 7o c\ m 0 0 CI 70oZ t 0 9.A.7 Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Attachment 7 - Items from Court Reporter (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 4apiapLrs iiatiu ? rw NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT 1368601 PUBLIC HEARING 45-172052 Pub Dates November 28,2016 s277 Sign ure of affiant) 1VONNE GORISworntoandsubscribedbeforeme4 ,+.":;, This Decembe 01,2016 i Notary Public-State of Floridatil..%1 Commission *FF 900570 3.--c My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 1444‘"•••• Bonded through National Notary Assn.431'1' Signatur of affiant) ' 9.A.8 Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment 8 - Legal Notifications (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 18A Monday,November 28,2016 Naples Daily News Army's advance in Aleppo „'n'"'000, displaces thousands Rebel defenses collapse Syrian state TV broadcast a video Sat- C urday showing a teary reunion between a a) before government attack soldier and his family after nearly five Eyears apart,accordingto the report.It said t PHILIP ISSA ASSOCIATED PRESS thelfamily had been trapped in Masaken A YOURYOo R Thousands of residents fled Sunday TheLebanese Al-Manar TVchannel re- MOTHER-1N-LAW 0. amid simultaneous advances by Syrian ported from the neighborhood Sunday — Amadern',error from wifson Lightingu CD LI government and Kurdish-led forms into morning,showing workers and soldiers i ianti to wow oil Is 1n us Q Z eastern Aleppo. clearing debris against a backdrop of guomm yourgues Rebel defenses collapsed as govern- bombed-out buildings on both sides of a 1 help you prep/or the holidays today! ment forces pushed into the city's Sakhour wide thoroughfare.Al-Manar is operated C Qneighborhood,coming within about half a by Hezbollah,the Lebanesemilitant group mile of commanding a corridor in eastern aligned with the Syrian government. C W Aleppo for the first time since rebels The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Q swept into the city in 2012,according to Forces'advance into Bustan al-Kasha N Syrian state media and the Syrian Obser- dealt the opposition a further blow. vatory for Human Rights monitoring Rebels and opposition figures have U) a group. long accused the SDF and its predecessor C) J Kurdish-led forces operating autono- groups of conspiring with the government C. CO CO mously of the rebels and the government, to quash a nationwide revolt. SINEE 1975 CO Q r =meanwhile,seized the Bustan al-Basha Araj denied there was anycoordination lie ante.Way neighborhood m NAPLES•24 northern Aleppo,allow- between government and Kurdish-led 65 r r 23919x6006 18 Z Z Q 0..ing thousands of civilians to flee the deoi- forces. BO,NITA SPRINGS-3333 1..1$5011a Blvd•239.948.9000 Monday-Thursday 9 to 6•Fiaay 9 to 5•Saturday 10 to 5 mated district,according to Ahmad Hiso "We were responding to calls romr si- ioForofficial with the Syrian Democrat- dents in Bustan al-Kasha to secure the 11,1,,u,,,,,n,n,.,u u I.I I,u I I n,t, is Forces. neighborhood,"he said.He added the SDF The government's push,backed by had entered the area handily as rebel mil- t') thousands of Shiite militia fighters from items fled. q 1 1aeS-'"' Lebanon,Iraq,and Iran,and under the oc- Aleppo used to be Syria's larges[city ea- Qom' -`t s U' 'h i'F' F"'" ' a) casional cover of the Russian air force,has and commerce capital before its neighbor L5 'n I alae I`€ laid waste to Aleppo's eastern neighbor- hoods were devastated by the country's 4., ai I O hoods and trapped some 250,000 people- more than five-year-long civil war. kiki d .4 T T E R`" N Food supplies are running perilously The U N's child agency warned Sun- at. low,the U.N.warned Thursday,and a re- day that nearly 500,000 children were now ARElentlessairassaultbygovernmentforceslivingundersiegemSyria,cut of f from —y r, TT has damaged or destroyed every hospital food and medical aid,mostly m areas un jos } ? i • C in the area der government control That figure has .- t a FOResidentsineastAlepposaidindis- doubled in less than a year. yYCl) •• d tressed messages on social media that Many are now spending their days n- 9ta St-4W $6 i—. C O .0 thousands of people were fleeing to the homesderground, as hospitals, schools and X 4' C .t U city's , awaygovernment- controlled western homes remain vulnerable to aerial beta- neighborhoods,away from the govern- bardment QI C) co metis merciless assault,or deeper into "Children are being killed and injured, Plantation Shutters I Blinds&Shades I Hurricane Fabric I Impact Windows&Doors opposition-held eastern Aleppo. too afraid to go to school or even play,sur- Exterior Bahamas&Colonials I Rolldown&Accordion Shutters n The situation in besieged Aleppo(is) viving with little food and hardly any Visit our Showroom Today or Call to Schedule Your In-Home Estimate very very bad,thousands of eastern rail- medicine,"said UNICEF Executive Direc- dents are moving to the western side of the for Anthonylake."This is no way to live— city,"said[(haled Khatib,a photographer and too many are dying." Save$300 for the Syrian Civil Defense search-and- Activists also reported civ hon casual- on se rider of rescue group,also known as the White ties Sunday from a presumed government Lso sa.ftor more Helmets. or Russian airstrike on a village outside ovesentPremium time Aleppo is going to die,"he posted on Aleppo.o7esdmore. twitter. The Local Coordination Committees N APLES cornet be combined C Syrian state media reported govern- activist network in Syria reported 15 civil- Fw+/1.E+) NAPLES SHUTTER w;m ester oger:. meet forces had seized the Jabal Badro ians killed in a Russian airstrilte on the nil- wwW.nap1e56hUtter.COT cn'1130116 lt) neighborhood and entered Sakhour Sun- lage of Atsjara,controlled by the opposi- 1025 Power St.,Naples,FL 34104 Mon-Fri 8:30am-S:OOpm N day after it took control of the Masaken tion m the western Aleppo countryside, P i Hanano neighborhood Saturday and tens of others wounded. r0 X NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CO C ALLERGIES 9 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE CO Q V Q Notice Is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning z CI Z ASTHMA Commission at 9MeA.M.,on Thursday,December 16th, in the Board County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Governmentent Center,322 99 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: OF COLLIERHEADACHES? CO NTY,,FLORIDAFAM NDINGTHERD ORDINANCE NOCOF COUNTY02MMISS04-41. O SE AMENDED,THE ECOLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE n COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF Z COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS Q_ MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN E C T DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL(A) ZONING I— DISTRICT TOA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(RPUD)ZONING 0 A '''R-DIuI I . DEVELDISTRICT OPMEOR THE NT OF UP TTOF 6TKNOWN AS SINGLE-FAMILY AMILTON ANDOR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING 77 TO ALLOW 0 N1 0 UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE Q C co U I I all RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER I I — EOUNN, .[ ONSISTING OF 9.75+/-ACRES;AND BV PROVIDING ANCO ---EA IILJ' I(\`I IIf l\ COUNTY,EFFECTIVE DATE.FLORIDA,,CONSISTING 9. Additional Services Include:Licensed&Insured AIC Cleaning*Air Handler Cleaningforyourprotection! Pine Ridge RD ncAclatstso Sanitizing*Duct RepairsMasnsl•MRSA75 t Certified Mold Removal 1-75 4. Before&After Inspection z 72• State-of-the-Art UV Purification e Veen BLVD to Systems IOLOCATIONw r 1inspection J AO1 Lowest Price::FREE:: O% All Interested parties are'noted to appear and be heard. Copes of the proposed NEVefl r ORDINANCE will be made available for nspect on at the Collar County Clerk's office, fourth floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East Tam am Trail,suite 401,499511 Mold ;'OFF Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Witten comments must be filed with the FL, ng Diviwee on ortZonsServices led hea prior Written Thursday,December 15th, u N Inspection 1 2016. If a person d:des to appeal any de son made by the CoNar County Planning NLS Reg. With NDN , , commlaelpn win respect to any metier cons tlered at sDcn maatng or near g ha widAily/ need a record of that proceeding and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a Z ^ Unlimited:: Coupon verbatim record of the proceedings s made which record includesthetestimonyard i.i V u7 Vents! t evidenceupon which the appeal is to be based. arttt indudesl main::NiN INN Coupon Only. Only. ,,tt If youperson with a disability who needs any accommodation order to I cam participate In this proceeding you are entitled,at no cost to you,to theprovision of 4r ro ; Retum) 11 12 n certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Divis on, with XBN Coupon Onry.a i$ located at 3335 Tamam Trail East Suite 101,Naples FL 34112-5356,(239)252- 1- z 0 t v 8380,at least two days prior to the Meeting.Ass sted listening devices for the hearing rzt z To I I Free: 888-458-9428 Collier are available in me Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission tA le) Naples: 239-530-0104 November mer 28. zonnan November 28.2016 efv-t 2 9.A.8 Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment 8 - Legal Notifications (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.8 Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment 8 - Legal Notifications (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.8 Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attachment 8 - Legal Notifications (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) COLLIER COUNTY Growth Management Department November 23, 2016 Dear Property Owner: This is to advise you that because you may have interest in the proceedings or you own property located within 500 feet (urban areas) or 1,000 feet (rural areas) of the following described property, that a public hearing will be held by the Coll ier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on December 15, 2016,in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL., to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Colli er County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Hamilton Place RPUD to allow dev elopment of up to 66 single-family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.75+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] You are invited to appear and be heard at the public hearing. You may also submit your comments in writing. NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY STAFF MEMBER NOTED BELOW, A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. This petition, and other pertinent inform ation related to this petition, is kept on file and may be reviewed at the Growth Management Department building located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Please contact the staff member noted below at (239)-252-2931 to set up an appointment if you wish to review the file. Sincerely, Eric L. Johnson, AICP, CFM, LEED Green Associate Principal Planner 9.A.8 Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment 8 - Legal Notifications (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) Airport-Pulling RD NLivingston RDPine Ridge RD I-75 LIVINGSTON ROADKENSINGTON HIGH STREETEATONWO OD LANE LIVINGSTON ROADGOODEARTH DRIVEBRYNWOO D PRESERVE L ANE BRYNWOOD WAYKENSINGTON HIGH STLIVINGSTON ROADBISCAYNE COURT B IS C AY N E CO URTAVIANO DRIVESERRANO CIRCLE SERRANO CIRCLESERRANO CIRC LE R AF FI NA CO U RT PH 1 24 23 22 TR D21 20 19 TRACT 818 17TRACT GC1 TR16C 15 14 F 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3F2 1 TRACT R 1 2G3 TRACT 7 4 5 6 7 8 9 TRACT A10 TRACT A TRACT RCONSERVATION AREA P - 1TRACT B 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 TRACT B22 PH I WELLINGTON PLAC E ATKENSINGTON I C OND O TRACT E PHXIII PH VI TR C-1TRACT P-3 TRACT R TRACT P-1 TRACT C-2TR P-5 TRACT P-2TRACT P-1 TRACTE TRACT P-2 TRACT RTRACT L-1 TRACT L-1 TRACT F TRACT D Tract L-2 TRACT A TRACT P-1TRA CT P -2TRACT P-3 TRACT P-4 TR W-3 CONSERVATIONEASEMENTOR 4049 PG 2808 POSITANO PLACE BLDG 100 BLDG 200BLDG 1400BLDG 1500PGD ABLD G 1300BLDG 1200AT N APLES I CO NDO POSITANO PLACE AT N APLES II C OND OPGD BBLDG 1100BLDG 1000 BLD G 800BLDG 600BLDG 900BLDG 700POSITANOPLACEAT N APLESIII CONDO PGD DB L D G 3 0 0 BLDG 400 B L DG 5 0 0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV C ONDO PGD CFIRST NATIONALBANK CENTERCOMMERCIALCONDO OR 2854 PG 1408À1 À1 À3À1À2 À24 À1.1 À23 À22 À1À21 À1À20 À19 À18 À17 À16 À1À15 À14 À13 À66À67À12 À11 À10 À9 À8 À7 À6 X35 À5 À4 À3 À2 À1 À1 À1 À2 À3 À4 À1 X206 À5 À6 À1À7 À8 À9 À10 X32 X45 À85 X13.1À10À11À12À15À16À17À14À13À5À6À9À8À7À4À18À84 À1 À83 À82 X13.2 À1 À81 À80 À79 À19À20 X13.3À21À22À23À24À26À25À30À29À28À27À78À31À34À33À32 À77 À76 À48À44À47À46À45À43À41À42À40À39À36À37À35À38 À49 À75 X13 À1À74 À73 À1 À72 À71 À65 À70 À50À51À52À53À54À55À60À64À56À58À57À61À63À62À59 À69 À68 X41 X35X42X43 X23 À11 À12 À13 À14 À15 À16 À17 À18 À1 À19 À20 À21 À22 À3 X213 X39 À1 À2 À3 À51 À52 À53 À54 À55 À56 À57 À58 À74 À75 À76 À77 À78 À79 À80À81À82À83À84À85À86À87À88 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À12À13À14À15À16À17À18 À19 À20 À21 À22 À23 À24 À25 À26 À27 À28 À29 À30 À31 À32 À33 À34 À35 À36 À37 À38 À39 À40 À41 À42 À43 À44 À45 À46 À47 À48 À49 À50 À51 À52 À53 À54 À55 À56 À57 À102 À103 À104 À105 À121À122À123À124 À125 À126 À127 À128 À129 À130 À131 À132 À133 À134 À135 À136 À137 À138 À139 À140 À141 À142 À143 À144 À148À149À150À151 À152 À153 À154 À155 À156 À157 À158 À159 À160 À161 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1 À1À1 X53 X54 X55 X56 X218 X216 CU V V PU-b PUD PUD PUD P PUD CPUD PUD CFPUD PUD CPUD RSF-5(0.4) PUD PUD CPUD A PUD CPUD A MPUD BALDRIDGERELATEDGROUP BRYNWOODPRESERVE EVANSCPUD BALMORAL PINEVIEW KENSINGTONPARK HIWASSE ARLINGTONLAKES PINE RIDGECENTER PINE RIDGECENTER WEST NAPLESCHURCH OFCHRIST AVOWHOSPICE BRYNWOODCENTER Location Map Zoning Map Petition Number: PL-2016-1255 PROJEC TLOCATION SITELOCATION ¹ Docu ment Path: M:\GIS_Requests\2016\07-July\7-07-20 16 PL201 60001255\workspace\site-location.mxd 9.A.8 Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachment 8 - Legal Notifications (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) 9.A.9 Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Legal Ad - Agenda ID 2494 (2494 : Hamilton Place RPUD) Hamilton place RPUD Petition # PUDZ-PL20160001255 December 1, 2016 Page 1 of 1 December 15, 2016 CCPC Backup Material Application and Supporting Documents Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com July 1, 2016 Mr. Eric Johnson, AICP Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, Hamilton Place RPUD Rezone – PL20160001255 Dear Mr. Johnson: Attached, please find copies of a Collier County application for Public Hearing for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezone for properties located in the east side of Livingston Road south of Pine Ridge Road. This application proposes to rezone 10± acres from the A Zoning District to the Residential Planned Unit Development Zoning District to allow a maximum of 66 residential dwelling units. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: Barry Ernst Richard D. Yovanovich GradyMinor File From:Wayne Arnold To:"JohnsonEric"; "BellowsRay" Cc:Michael Delate; Sharon Umpenhour Subject:Hamilton Place RPUD Date:Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:16:16 PM Eric, I have confirmed with Mike Delate the design engineer that the project will comply with NFPA 1-18 for fire truck access measurements and dimensions. We will demonstrate this at the time of SDP or plat approval. I will have Sharon include this email with our PUD materials for the CCPC packets. Also please let me know at your earliest opportunity if the PUD needs to be revised to address the water management comment. Thank you, Wayne D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Planning Director 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Phone - 239.947.1144 Fax - 239.947.0375 Web - http://www.gradyminor.com DISCLAIMER: This communication from Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., along with any attachments or electronic data is intended only for the addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or otherwise exempt from disclosure. The recipient agrees and accepts the following conditions: The electronic file/data is for informational purposes only and is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this electronic file/data with the approved and certified "plan of record" along with actual project site conditions. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. reserves the right to revise, update and improve its electronically stored data without notice and assumes no responsibility due to a virus or damages caused by receiving this email. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 JohnsonEric From:Wayne Arnold <WArnold@gradyminor.com> Sent:Friday, December 02, 2016 10:44 AM To:JohnsonEric; BellowsRay Cc:Michael Delate; Sharon Umpenhour Subject:Hamilton Place RPUD Eric, I have confirmed with Mike Delate the design engineer that the project will comply with NFPA 1-18 and the Collier County Fire Marshal’s Policies and Procedures for fire truck access measurements and dimensions. We will demonstrate this at the time of SDP or plat approval. I will have Sharon include this email with our PUD materials for the CCPC packets. Also please let me know at your earliest opportunity if the PUD needs to be revised to address the water management comment. Thank you, Wayne D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Planning Director 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Phone - 239.947.1144 Fax - 239.947.0375 Web - http://www.gradyminor.com DISCLAIMER: This communication from Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., along with any attachments or electronic data is intended only for the addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or otherwise exempt from disclosure. The recipient agrees and accepts the following conditions: The electronic file/data is for informational purposes only and is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this electronic file/data with the approved and certified "plan of record" along with actual project site conditions. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. reserves the right to revise, update and improve its electronically stored data without notice and assumes no responsibility due to a virus or damages caused by receiving this email. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ____________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ________________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: __________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ____________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. To be completed by staff 4/15/2015 Page 1 of 16 ✔ WCI Communities, LLC 24301 Walden Center Drive Bonita Springs FL 34135 239.947.2600 barryernst@wcicommunities.com D. Wayne Arnold, AICP / Richard D. Yovanovich Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. / Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs FL 34134 239.947.1144 warnold@gradyminor.com / ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Please complete the following information, if space is inadequate use additional sheets and attach to the completed application packet. a.If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership 4/15/2015 Page 2 of 16 Parcel No. 00287840009 and 00287880001 Maria Leonor Santos - Please see Exhibit 1 100 Parcel No. 00287920000 100 Edmund H & Betty Poore - Please see Exhibit 1 Parcel No. 00287600003 Elfrieda H Sutherland Trust - Please see Exhibit 1 100 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: _________________________ Date option terminates: __________________, or Anticipated closing date: _________________ h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 4/15/2015 Page 3 of 16 WCI Communities, LLC (a publicly traded company) 100 73', 87', 95', 2001 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: _________________________ Zoning district(s) to the ________________________________zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: _________________________________________ Original PUD Name: ________________________________________________________________ Ordinance No.: ____________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: x If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; x The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and x The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Size of Property: _______ ft. x _______ ft. = ________ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): Commercial Residential Community Facilities Industrial Mixed Use Other: ________________ 4/15/2015 Page 4 of 16 A, Agricultural Residential Planned Unit Development Undeveloped and residential Residential Not Applicable Not Applicable 18 49 26 Please see Exhibit 2 - Legal Description 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001 and 00287840009 9.75+/- East side of Livingston Road at the intersection of Nighthawk Drive COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ 4/15/2015 Page 5 of 16 PUD (Brynwood Preserve) Residential PUD (Arlington Lakes) Residential PUD (Arlington Lakes) Residential ROW and CPUD (Hiwasse) Livingston Road and undeveloped commercial Brynwood Preserve Residents Association Inc. 9150 Galleria Ct. Suite 201 Naples FL 34109 Positano Place at Naples Master Association Inc. 12910 Positano Circle Naples FL 34105 Kensington Park Master Association 5435 Jaeger Road #4 Naples FL 34109 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 4/15/2015 Page 6 of 16 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered “open” when the determination of “sufficiency” has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered “closed” when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed “closed” will not receive further processing and an application “closed” through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed “closed” may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of “sufficiency”. Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. 4/15/2015 Page 7 of 16 Not Applicable COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary Completed Application with required attachments Pre-application meeting notes Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 2 Completed Addressing Checklist 2 Warranty Deed(s) 3 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 2 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 4 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 4 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 5 Statement of Utility Provisions 4 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 4 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 4 Traffic Impact Study 7 Historical Survey 4 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 2 Electronic copy of all required documents 2 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24” x 36”and One 8 ½” x 11” copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24” x 36” – Only if Amending the PUD Checklist continued onto next page… 4/15/2015 Page 11 of 16 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.” PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00, to be paid directly to Transportation at the Methodology Meeting* *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $925.00 o BCC: $500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 4/15/2015 Page 12 of 16 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re-submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. All checks may be made payable to: Board of County Commissioners 4/15/2015 Page 13 of 16 Hamilton Place RPUD Exhibit 1 Disclosure of Interest Information June 24, 2016 Page 1 of 2 a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Parcel No. 00287840009 and 00287880001 Maria Leonor Santos 100% 2136 Andrew Drive Naples, FL 34112 Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Parcel No. 00287920000 Edmund H & Betty Poore 100% 7025 Nighthawk Drive Naples, FL 34105-4831 c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Parcel No. 00287600003 Elfrieda H Sutherland Trust 100% C/O Gayle Ann Durrance 2076 Sagebrush Circle Naples, FL 34120-4568 Beneficiaries of Trust Percentage of Ownership Lynda Kay Turner 25% after honoring the Trust Gayle Ann Durrance 25% after honoring the Trus George Alex Sutherland, Jr. 25% after honoring the Trus Fred Richard Sutherland 25% after honoring the Trus Hamilton Place RPUD Exhibit 1 Disclosure of Interest Information June 24, 2016 Page 2 of 2 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address Percentage of Ownership WCI Communities, LLC (a publicly traded company) 100% 24301 Walden Center Drive Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Date of contract date of option date option terminates anticipated closing Hamilton Place PUD Exhibit 2 Legal Description June 24, 2016 Page 1 of 1 (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504066) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 528.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504081) THE WEST 264 FEET AND THE EAST 264 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504087) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 792.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 1056.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Hamilton Place RPUD Exhibit 3 Evaluation Criteria September 13, 2016 Page 1 of 3 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. Narrative Statement Describing Request The Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) proposes to develop up to 66 residential dwelling units on 10± acres. The property is located near Activity Center #10, which is located at Interstate 75 (I-75) and Pine Ridge Road. A majority of the site is located within the density band surrounding the Activity Center. The Urban Future Land Use Category permits a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), and because it is also within the density band, the site is eligible to seek a bonus density of up to 3 du/ac for a total maximum density of 7 du/ac. The proposed RPUD seeks a maximum density of 6.6 dwelling units per acre and is consistent with density rating system of the Future Land Use Element. The project will be developed in a single phase. Per LDC Section 4.07.02 A, the minimum PUD acreage of 10 acres is not applicable for “infill” parcels. Infill PUD’s must have a minimum acreage of 2 acres and the proposed Hamilton Place RPUD has an acreage of 9.8± acres. The proposed PUD has development to the north and south and therefore meets the definition of “infill” per LDC Section 4.07.02.A.2. Appropriate development standards are proposed to insure compatibility for this infill project. 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. All infrastructure is in place to support the proposed residential dwellings. The project is adjacent to residential development to the north, south and east, therefore the redevelopment of the site for residential is consistent with the nearby development pattern. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. Hamilton Place RPUD Exhibit 3 Evaluation Criteria September 13, 2016 Page 2 of 3 The applicant is the contract purchaser of the parcels that make up the 9.8± acre RPUD. 3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) Approximately 5.5± acres of the 10± acre property are located within the Density Band surrounding Activity Center #10. Because greater than 50% of the site is within the Density Band, the bonus density of 3 du/ac may be applied to the entirety of the site. A maximum density of 7 du/ac is possible and the requested 6.6 du/ac is consistent with the density rating system. Objective 7 of the Future Land Use Element encourages interconnectivity of developments where feasible. This infill property is surrounded by existing residential development to the north and south and connection to these fully developed communities is not feasible. To the east is an existing preserve and connection through this preserve is not feasible. Policy 6.1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element requires projects of this size to provide for preservation of 15% of the existing native vegetation. The proposed conceptual Master Plan depicts a preserve area on-site consisting of 1.5 acres, which represents 15% of the native vegetation existing on-site. A Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared for the project. the TIS concludes that there is available capacity on the nearby Collier County roads. The project is consistent with Policy 1.3 of the Transportation Element, which establishes available capacity for our roadways. The Hamilton Place RPUD is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Properties located immediately to the north, south and east are developed with residential. Livingston Road and an undeveloped commercial PUD are to the west. Hamilton Place RPUD Exhibit 3 Evaluation Criteria September 13, 2016 Page 3 of 3 Access to the subject site will be via Livingston Road. Residential development standards have been established which insure compatibility of the proposed residential dwellings with surrounding properties. Buffers will be provided per the LDC to insure compatibility with immediately adjacent properties. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. Usable open space will be provided within the PUD as required by the LDC for the commercial or residential development options. The PUD makes provisions for an amenity area and a variety of accessory recreational uses. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The project is subject to concurrency and adequate infrastructure must be in place to support future development on the site. There are no known capacity issues that will impact this project. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Hamilton Place RPUD is surrounded by zoned, developed and undeveloped land. Expansion of the RPUD boundary is not proposed. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Hamilton Place RPUD proposes to include uses and development standards appropriate for the site and consistent with the Land Development Code. The requested deviations are necessary for the development to achieve standards for the property owner and are consistent with any Goal of the Growth Management Plan. 0100'50'SCALE: 1" = 100'GradyMinorCivil EngineersƔLand SurveyorsƔPlannersƔLandscape ArchitectsCert. of Auth. EB 0005151Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151Business LC 26000266 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144Fort Myers: 239.690.4380PINE RIDGE ROADLIVINGSTON ROADSUBJECT PROPERTY Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 1 of 8 12/01/2016 EXHIBIT A FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD Regulations for development of the Hamilton Place RPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Document and applicable sections of the LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. PERMITTED USES: A maximum of 66 residential dwelling units shall be permitted within the RPUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Dwelling Units – Multi-family, single family detached, single family attached and single family variable lot line. 2. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) or the Hearing Examiner. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Customary accessory uses associated with the principal uses permitted in this RPUD, including but not limited to garages, carports, swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures and utility buildings. 2. Gatehouses, and access control structures. 3. Recreational uses and facilities including swimming pools. 4. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 5. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 6. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner. AMENITY AREA Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 2 of 8 12/01/2016 A. Principal Uses: 1. Clubhouses with cafes, snack bars and similar uses intended to serve residents and guests. 2. Community administrative and recreation facilities. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis/pickle ball courts and basketball courts, parks, playgrounds, pedestrian/bikeways, and passive and/or active water features (private intended for use by the residents and their guests only). 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, landscape nurseries, gazebos, boat and canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters to serve residents and their guests. 4. Tennis clubs, health spas, fitness facilities and other indoor recreational uses (private, intended for use by the residents and their guests only). B. Accessory Uses: 1. Model homes and model home centers including sales trailers and offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing. 2. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this PUD as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner. PRESERVE A. Allowable Uses: 1. Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve area to be retained. 2. Mitigation for environmental permitting. 3. Passive Recreation areas, as per LDC requirements. 4. Water management as allowed by the LDC. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 3 of 8 12/01/2016 EXHIBIT B FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for land uses within the Hamilton Place RPUD Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. STANDARDS SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED VARIABLE LOT LINE FOR SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED MULTI-FAMILY AMENITY CENTER Minimum Lot Area 5,000 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF 1 acre 10,000 SF Minimum Lot Width *3 50 feet 40 feet 35 feet 100 feet N/A Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet N/A Minimum Front Yard *1,*6 20 feet *2 20 feet *2 20 feet *2 20 feet N/A Minimum Side Yard 5 feet 0 - 10 feet *4 0 or 5 feet 10 feet N/A Minimum Rear Yard *6 Principal 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet N/A Maximum Height Zoned Actual 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet Minimum Distance Between Principal Structures *5 12 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A Floor Area Min. (S.F.) 1500 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF N/A PUD Boundary 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Front 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Side 5 feet 0 feet 0 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard *6 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet N/A PUD Boundary 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Structures 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Maximum Height Zoned Actual 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type, and not the minimum lot area, shall define the development standards to be applied by the Growth Management Department during an application for a building permit. For variable lot single family and single family attached units, a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configurations, including building setbacks and building separations, shall be submitted to the Growth Management Division with the application for the first building permit for the platted development tract. Verification of ingress/egress for maintenance shall be provided for variable lot line single-family units. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. *1 – Front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way, setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. B. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 4 of 8 12/01/2016 C. If the parcel has frontage on two sides, setback is measured from the side with the shortest frontage with the other frontage designated as a side yard. *2 –Front entry garages must be a minimum of 20’, and a minimum of 23’ from a sidewalk. Porches, entry features and roofed courtyards may be reduced to 15’. *3 – Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul-de-sac lots provided the minimum lot area requirement is maintained. *4 – The side setback may be variable between zero feet (0’) to ten feet (10’) as long as a 10-foot minimum separation between principal structures is maintained. If the variable lot line for single-family option is utilized, the owner shall provide with the building permit application, the setback of the principal structures on the abutting lots of all sides. *5 – Building distance may be reduced at garages to a minimum of 0’ where attached garages are provided and a 10’ minimum building separation is maintained, if detached. *6 – No front building setback is required from the 30’ wide access easement, which extends along the southerly boundary of the Hamilton Place PUD. However, a landscape buffer shall be required. Note: nothing in this RPUD Document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. ZONED: ARLINGTON LAKES PUDUSE: RESIDENTIALZONED: BRYNWOOD PRESERVE PUD (PLAT BOOK 38 PAGE 54 - 57)USE: RESIDENTIALLIVINGSTON ROAD30' ESMT (SEE NOTE #2)PROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTYBOUNDARY30'ESMT(SEE NOTE #3)WATER MANAGEMENTAMENITYAREARESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALZONED: ARLINGTON LAKES PUDUSE: PRESERVEMF - 10' WIDE TYPE 'A' LANDSCAPE BUFFERSF - 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER15' WIDE TYPE 'B'LANDSCAPE BUFFER20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFERACCESS GATE(APPROX. LOCATION)WATER MANAGEMENTPRESERVE0100'50'SCALE: 1" = 100'GradyMinorCivil EngineersƔLand SurveyorsƔPlannersƔLandscape ArchitectsCert. of Auth. EB 0005151Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151Business LC 26000266 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144Fort Myers: 239.690.4380SITE DATATOTAL SITE AREA:$&RESIDENTIAL$&AMENITY AREA$&PRESERVE$&WATER MANAGEMENT$&EASEMENTS$&BUFFERS/OPEN SPACE$&MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS:66MAXIMUM DENSITY:6.77 DU/ACPRESERVE:5(48,5('$&5(6$&5(61$7,9(VEGETATION X 15%)3529,'('$&5(6REVISED11/15/2016NOTES1.THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUETO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS.2.30.0' EASEMENT (OR 335, PG 839), UTILITY EASEMENT (OR 1729, PG 395)SUBORDINATION OF ENCUMBRANCE (OR 1729, PG 390)3.30.0' EASEMENT (OR 543, PG 76)4.THE EXISTING PRESERVES WILL MEET BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTICS AREREMOVED.5.THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPROPRIATEFIRE CODES AND WILL BE SHOWN ON THE SDP PLAN. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 6 of 8 12/01/2016 EXHIBIT D FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504066) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 528.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504081) THE WEST 264 FEET AND THE EAST 264 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504087) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 792.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 1056.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 7 of 8 12/01/2016 EXHIBIT E FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LIST OF DEVIATIONS No Deviations requested. Hamilton Place RPUD, PL20160001255 Page 8 of 8 12/01/2016 EXHIBIT F FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 1. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is WCI Communities, LLC, 24301 Walden Center Drive, Bonita Springs, FL 34135. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2. MISCELLANEOUS a. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. b. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development 3. TRANSPORTATION Any platted roadway will comply with LDC requirements, unless a deviation is approved in accordance with the LDC. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL The RPUD shall be required to preserve 15% of native vegetation, 6.46± acres of native vegetation exists on-site requiring a minimum preservation of 0.97± acres (6.46 x .15 = 0.97) of native vegetation to be retained. The preservation plans shall meet or exceed the requirements of the LDC. 5. WATER MANAGEMENT The project’s stormwater management system shall be designed to discharge to the east into the Whippoorwill Flowway. Digitally signed by James M. Banks DN: cn=James M. Banks, o, ou, email=jmbswte@msn.com, c=US Date: 2016.07.05 15:02:23 -04'00' PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONNOTES:A PARCEL OF LANDLYING INCOLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDADRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:JOB CODE:SCALE:DATE:FILE:SHEET:30 MARCH 20161" = 50'DLSKJG16-37-ALTA-DIG.DWG1 of 1GradyMinorCivil Engineers●Land Surveyors●Planners●Landscape ArchitectsCert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144Fort Myers: 239.690.4380SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST SCHEDULE B-II EXCEPTIONSCERTIFIED TO:VICINITY MAPLEGENDSCHEDULE B-II EXCEPTIONSSCHEDULE B-II EXCEPTIONSSITEDigitally signed by Donald L. Saintenoy, III, PSM #6761, State of Florida DN: cn=Donald L. Saintenoy, III, PSM #6761, State of Florida, o=This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Donald L. Saintenoy, III, PSM, on the date shown below using SHA-1 authentication code, ou=Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed and the SHA-1 authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies., email=dsaintenoy@gradyminor.com, c=US Date: 2016.06.27 08:49:07 -04'00' Adobe Acrobat version: 11.0.16 00287920000.pdf 00287920000 Deed.pdf 00287600003.pdf 00287600003 Deed.pdf 00287840009.pdf 00287840009 Deed.pdf 00287880001.pdf 00287880001 Deed.pdf DEEDS $ 8,000 $ 135,000 $ 132,118 $ 267,118 $ 60,034 $ 207,084 $ 25,000 $ 182,084 $ 25,000 $ 157,084 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00287920000 Site Adr.7025 NIGHTHAWK DR Name / Address POORE, EDMUND H=& BETTY 7025 NIGHTHAWK DR City NAPLES State FL Zip 34105-4831 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4B18 000100 043 4B18 18 49 26 2 Legal 18 49 26 E 264FT OF W 528FT OF S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 2 AC OR 543 PG 76 Millage Area 104 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 5.48 5.6427 11.1227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 07/01/73 543-76 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) Save our Home (=) Assessed Value (-) Homestead (=) School Taxable Value (-) Additional Homestead (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 6/3/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00287920000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 340,211 $ 0 $ 340,211 $ 95,559 $ 244,652 $ 340,211 $ 244,652 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00287600003 Site Adr. Name / Address ELFRIEDA H SUTHERLAND TRUST C/O GAYLE ANN DURRANCE 2076 SAGEBRUSH CIR City NAPLES State FL Zip 34120-4568 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4B18 000100 035 4B18 18 49 26 4 Legal 18 49 26 W 264FT + E 264FT OF FOLL, S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 3.94 AC Millage Area 104 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.48 5.6427 11.1227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 12/11/95 2127-535 02/19/93 1798-1730 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 6/3/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00287600003 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,000 $ 180,000 $ 0 $ 180,000 $ 92,000 $ 88,000 $ 180,000 $ 88,000 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00287840009 Site Adr. Name / Address SANTOS, MARIA LEONOR 2316 ANDREW DR City NAPLES State FL Zip 34112 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4B18 000100 041 4B18 18 49 26 2 Legal 18 49 26 E 264FT OF W 1056FT OF S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 2 AC OR 1244 PG 1779 Millage Area 104 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.48 5.6427 11.1227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 01/01/87 1244-1779 02/01/80 855-644 10/01/73 555-802 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 6/3/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00287840009 $ 0 $ 0 $ 53,000 $ 0 $ 180,000 $ 0 $ 180,000 $ 92,000 $ 88,000 $ 180,000 $ 88,000 Collier County Property AppraiserProperty Summary Parcel No.00287880001 Site Adr. Name / Address SANTOS, MARIA L 2316 ANDREW DR City NAPLES State FL Zip 34112 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4B18 000100 042 4B18 18 49 26 2 Legal 18 49 26 E 264FT OF W 792FT OF S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 2 AC OR 1449 PG 231 Millage Area 104 Millage Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 99 - ACREAGE NOT ZONED AGRICULTURAL 5.48 5.6427 11.1227 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book-Page Amount 07/10/01 2856-3306 07/10/01 2856-3304 06/19/89 1449-231 10/01/73 543-78 2015 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (=) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (=) Assessed Value (=) School Taxable Value (=) Taxable Value If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Page 1 of 1 6/3/2016http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00287880001 Hamilton Place Collier County Environmental Data Narrative Collier County, Florida Hamilton Place Environmental Narrative October 2016 Cardno i Hamilton_Place_Rezone_Environmental_Narrative_Final_10182016 Document Information Prepared for WCI Communities, Inc. Project Name Hamilton Place Project Number E216021100 Project Manager Tammy Lyday Date June 2016 (Revised October 2016) Prepared for: WCI Communities, Inc. 24301 Walden Center Drive Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Prepared by: Cardno 551 N. Cattlemen Road, Suite 106, Sarasota, FL 34232 Hamilton Place Environmental Narrative October 2016 Cardno ii Hamilton_Place_Rezone_Environmental_Narrative_Final_10182016 Table of Contents 1 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Existing Site Conditions .................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Upland Communities ........................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Wetland and Aquatic Communities ..................................................................................... 3 3 Proposed Project Description ........................................................................................... 4 3.1 Native Vegetation Preservation ........................................................................................... 4 3.2 Wetland and Other Surface Water Impacts ........................................................................ 5 3.3 Wetland Compensation ....................................................................................................... 5 4 Listed Species Concerns .................................................................................................. 5 4.1 Listed Species Survey Results ............................................................................................ 8 4.2 Listed Plant Survey.............................................................................................................. 9 Tables Table 2-1. Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System and Native Vegetation Assessment for Hamilton Place in Collier County, Florida. ................................................ 2 Table 4-1. Listed Wildlife Species With Potential to Occur on the Livingston Lakes Project Site in Collier County, Florida. ............................................................................................ 6 Table 4-2. Listed Plant Species With Potential to Occur on the Livingston Lakes Project Site in Collier County, Florida. .................................................................................................... 8 Figures Figure 1 Location Map Figure 2 USGS Quadrangle Map Figure 3 1973 Historic Aerial Figure 4 1985 Historic Aerial Figure 5 1993 Historic Aerial Figure 6 Land Use Map Figure 7 NRCS Soils Map Figure 8 Native Vegetation Assessment Map Figure 9 Wetland / OSW Jurisdictional Map Figure 10 Listed Species Survey Results Map Appendices Appendix A Resume for Tammy Lyday Appendix B Resume for Andrew Fuddy Hamilton Place Environmental Narrative October 2016 Cardno 1 Hamilton_Place_Rezone_Environmental_Narrative_Final_10182016 1 Overview Cardno provides this environmental narrative in support of an application for the rezoning of the Hamilton Place property. The project purpose is to develop a residential neighborhood and associated stormwater management system, infrastructure and amenities within the proximity to major roadways within Collier County. WCI Communities, Inc. (WCI) proposes to construct approximately 66 multi-family homes, supporting infrastructure, and community amenities. Hamilton Place is proposed on a 10+ acre site located approximately 0.5 mile south of the intersection of Pine Ridge Road (County Road 896) and Livingston Road on Nighthawk Drive in Sections 13 and 18, Township 49S, Range 26E, Collier County, Florida (the Project Site) (Figures 1 and 2). The center of the project is located at Latitude 27.2041°; Longitude -81.7822°. This Environmental Narrative and supporting information are provided in support of a rezone application to construct a residential development, supporting infrastructure, and community amenities. The site was surveyed by Cardno ecologist, Tammy Lyday with academic credentials and work experience exceeding the County’s requirements. Ms. Lyday holds a Master’s Degree and over 15 years of professional experience conducted the habitat assessment, wetland jurisdictional determination, habitat functional assessment, and gopher tortoise survey (Appendix A). Cardno wildlife ecologists, Andrew Fuddy holds a Bachelor’s Degree and more than 10 years of professional experience conducted the initial bat survey (Appendix B). Both ecologists are Certified Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) Gopher Tortoise Agents. 2 Existing Site Conditions The Project Site is characterized as predominantly undeveloped lands with a single residential home in the central portion of the site. The site is bounded by existing single-family and multi-family residential neighborhoods to the north and south, respectively. Several neighborhood communities exist further to the east, west, and south, with commercial land uses to the north along Pine Ridge Road. Interstate 75 is located approximately 0.7 mile to the east and Pine Ridge Road is 0.4 mile to the north. No regionally significant parks or preserves abut the Project. The site is interspersed with a freshwater wetland system that has been highly altered by past land- management activities. Based on historic aerials, the property east of the existing residence was cleared, perhaps for agricultural uses. The 1973 aerial image (Figure 3) shows some ditching and excavation of a borrow pond in the vicinity of the Project Site. More recently, developments to the north and south have significantly altered the local hydrology and appear to have impounded more water on the Project Site. This is apparent in the central portion of the site that is seemingly dry in the 1985 and 1993 aerial and now contains marginal wetlands under current conditions (Figures 4 - 6, respectively). The existing conditions of upland and wetland plant communities were extensively studied and mapped using the Florida Land Use Cover Forms and Classification System (FLUCFCS, Florida Department of Transportation 1999) (Table 2-1). An aerial photograph and FLUCFCS land use map of the site is provided as Figure 6. Figure 7 is a Soils Map of the Project Site. Hamilton Place Environmental Narrative October 2016 Cardno 2 Hamilton_Place_Rezone_Environmental_Narrative_Final_10182016 Table 2-1. Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System and Native Vegetation Assessment for Hamilton Place in Collier County, Florida. FLUCFCS Code FLUCFCS Classification Total Acres Native Vegetation Percent of Site Uplands 110 Low Density Residential 1.61 N 16.5% 422 Brazilian Pepper (Within Easement or Single-Family Residential) 0.78 N 8.0% 422 Brazilian Pepper (Previously Cleared) 0.66 Y 6.8% 424 Melaleuca (Within Easement) 0.05 N 0.05% 424 Melaleuca (Previously Cleared) 0.14 Y 1.4% Subtotal 3.24 0.80 acres of Uplands 33.2% Wetlands and Surface Waters of the US 422H/625 Hydric Brazilian Pepper/ Flatwoods (Previously Cleared) 0.34 Y 3.5% 510 Ditch / Swale (Within Easement or Single-Family Residential) 0.37 N 3.8% 510 Ditch / Swale (Previously Cleared) 0.08 Y 0.8% 619/621 Exotic Wetland Hardwoods/ Cypress (Within Easement) 0.01 N 0.1% 619/621 Exotic Wetland Hardwoods/ Cypress (Previously Cleared) 1.27 Y 13.0% 621E2 Cypress with Exotics, 25-49% 1.42 Y 14.6% 625E4 Hydric Pine Flatwoods with Exotics, >75% (Within Easement or Parcel Not Previously Cleared) 0.47 N 4.8% 625E4 Hydric Pine Flatwoods with Exotics, >75% (Previously Cleared) 2.55 Y 26.2% Subtotal 6.51 5.66 acres of Wetlands 66.8% TOTAL 9.75 6.46 acres of Native Vegetation 100% 2.1 Upland Communities Approximately 3.24 acres of uplands occur within the Project Site. The uplands have been altered from their natural condition by the previous clearing activities, infestation of exotic vegetation, and construction and habitation of the existing single-family residence and associated improvements. The following provides a summary of existing conditions of each upland habitat type. Hamilton Place Environmental Narrative October 2016 Cardno 3 Hamilton_Place_Rezone_Environmental_Narrative_Final_10182016 Low Density Residential (FLUCFCS 110) A single residence with dirt driveway and an outbuilding is located on the Project Site. Remnant vegetation includes slash pine (Pinus elliottii), with scattered live oak (Quercus virginiana), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), and landscape plants. Groundcover includes Bahia grass (Paspalum notatum), Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), and Virginia buttonweed (Diodia virginiana). Brazilian Pepper (FLUCFCS 422) The northcentral and south portion of the property are typically stands of Brazilian (Schinus terebinthifolia) pepper along the sloping berm from the adjacent multi-family residential developments. An additional monoculture of Brazilian pepper is located east of the residential home site located on the property. Melaleuca (FLUCFCS 424) This habitat is located in the western and southern portions of the Project Site. It is dominated by exotic species of melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) and some Brazilian pepper. The groundcover contains swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), wire grass (Aristida stricta), and yellow-eyed grass (Xyris.spp.). 2.2 Wetland and Aquatic Communities The Project Site contains two (2) wetlands and four (4) distinctive surface water ditches. The limits of onsite wetlands and other surface waters (OSW) were established by Cardno ecologists but have not been verified by South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) staff to date. The assessed wetlands and surface water ditches total 6.51 acres. The quality of wetlands within the Project Site varies depending on location and hydrologic function. All of the wetlands have various degrees of exotic vegetation invasion. Based on historic aerials, the parcels east of the existing residence have been previously cleared. The property east of the existing residence was cleared, perhaps for agricultural uses. More recently, developments to the north and south have significantly altered the local hydrology and appear to have impounded more water on the Project Site. This is apparent in the central portion of the site that is seemingly dry in the 1985 and 1995 aerial and now contains marginal wetlands under current conditions. The overall quality of each wetland is summarized below. Hydric Brazilian Pepper / Flatwoods (FLUCFCS 422H /625) The north perimeters of the property are typically stands of seemingly hydric Brazilian pepper along the sloping berm from the adjacent multi-family residential developments. The native habitat is difficult to determine with the level of disturbance and alteration to this habitat. No native trees are present; although the adjacent habitat, even though altered, is presumed to be hydric flatwoods. Therefore, the assumption is that the native component of this habitat was hydric pine flatwoods. Ditch/ Swale (FLUCFCS 510) A deep roadside ditch is located along Livingston Road and smaller swales are located internal to the Project Site. The deep ditch contains emergent species such as primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), Brazilian pepper, cabbage palm, and torpedo grass (Panicum repens). The internal ditches only contain Brazilian pepper. Exotic Wetland Hardwoods (FLUCFCS 619) This habitat is located in the western portion of the Project Site along Livingston Road. It is dominated by exotic species of melaleuca, earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), and Brazilian pepper. The groundcover is dominated by a monoculture of swamp fern. Several downed trees are located throughout this habitat, perhaps due to fluctuations in the water table. Adventitious rooting and moss collars are apparent on the melaleuca approximately 2-3 inches above grade. The native habitat is difficult to determine due to the level of disturbance and alteration to this habitat. Few native trees (slash pine and cypress) were scatter throughout; therefore the assumption is the habitat was dominated by cypress at one time. Hamilton Place Environmental Narrative October 2016 Cardno 4 Hamilton_Place_Rezone_Environmental_Narrative_Final_10182016 Cypress with Exotic 25-49% (FLUCFCS 621E2) This area is located along the most eastern portion of the Project Site directly abutting the off-site preserve areas. Vegetation includes bald cypress and cabbage palm at low densities (~5-10%) and higher percentages of exotic vegetation of melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and earleaf acacia. Mid-story and shrub strata are very similar with the predominance of exotic vegetation along with downy rose myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa) and scattered wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera). Groundcover contains wire grass, bluestem (Andropogon spp.), swamp fern, and yellow-eyed grass. Again, this area contained several downed trees, perhaps due to fluctuations in the water table and subsidence. No standing water was present during the field survey although moss collars and adventitious rooting were observed 3-4 inches above grade. Hydric Pine Flatwoods with Exotics >75% (FLUCFCS 625E4) Based on historic aerials (1985 and 1995), much of this area was previously cleared, perhaps for residential development. Since clearing, the habitat is now dominated by over 75% invasive melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and earleaf acacia with minimal slash pine overstory. Mid-story and shrub strata are very similar with the predominance of exotic vegetation along with downy rose myrtle, cabbage palm, and scattered wax myrtle. Groundcover contains wire grass, bluestem, swamp fern, yellow-eyed grass, and various sedges. No standing water was present during the assessment in June; however, upon tropical storm effects in September, some standing water was present in vary degrees. Moss collars and adventitious rooting were observed 3-4 inches above grade. 3 Proposed Project Description The Hamilton Place project is proposed as a residential development consisting of approximately 66-unit multi-family development with supporting infrastructure, and community amenities by WCI on approximately 10± acres of the project. 3.1 Native Vegetation Preservation Based on LDC Section 3.05.07, a minimum of 15% of the existing native habitat will be preserved. As stated above, portions of the site have undergo some amount of vegetation clearing as evident on the 1985 and 1995 aerials. The existing single-family residence has been cleared legally prior to 1985 and would have been allow for up to 2 acres to be cleared under an exemption to Ordinance No. 75-21. No clearing is evident for the most easterly 2-acre parcel. In additional, a 30-foot easement is located along the south boundary and the western boundary abutting Livingston Road that does allow for clearing activities. No agricultural use appears to have occurred any of the parcels. Where vegetation has been previously cleared without a permit, the amount of native vegetation used to calculate the native vegetation retention (Preserve) requirement for the County is the amount of native vegetation present at the time prior to the clearing. According to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), Table 2-1 and the native Habitat Assessment Map (Figure 8), identifies that 6.46 acres of assumed native vegetation that exists on the project site, of which 15% would be 0.97 acres required. Native habitat is limited to pine flatwood with exotics containing 25-49% and cypress with exotics containing 25-49% and the presumed native vegetation on previously cleared parcels. The project has committed to avoid more wetlands and native habitats then required, preserving 1.05 acres of the cypress dominated habitat with the current site plan. The preserve area is located along the eastern and portion along the northern boundary of the project strategically connecting to and expanding the existing wildlife corridor along the eastern portion of several properties. The site design includes the preservation of natural areas to the eastern to connect to a natural wetland preserve from adjacent properties. Hamilton Place Environmental Narrative October 2016 Cardno 5 Hamilton_Place_Rezone_Environmental_Narrative_Final_10182016 3.2 Wetland and Other Surface Water Impacts The Master Plan for the project illustrates the proposed impacts to Wetlands A and B (5.01 acres), and ditch impacts to OSW-C, D, E, and F (0.45 acres) (Figure 9). The final acreage and configuration of each alteration area may be modified as a result of the regulatory agency review and approval during the permitting process. The site has been designed to avoid impacts to wetlands to the greatest extent practicable. Proposed impacts to Wetland A (3.74 acres) are the result of the expansive extents of the wetland over the eastern portion of the site. The wetland impacts due to filling are necessary to allow for the construction of the residential units, associated driveway, parking areas, and amenity area. Dredge impacts are the result of stormwater pond construction. Proposed impacts to Wetland B (1.27 acres) are the result of the expansive extents of the wetland over the eastern portion of the site. The wetland impacts due to filling are necessary to allow for the construction of the residential units, associated driveway, and parking areas. Dredge impacts are the result of dry detention area along the northern portion of the wetland. The proposed impacts to OSWs C, D, E, and F (0.45 acres) are required for the filling for residential units and driveway. As stated above, the project proposes to avoid the higher quality cypress wetland along the eastern portion of the site that provides water quality enhancement, connectivity, and wildlife corridor that has been previously established from the surrounding developments. This will provide for preservation of the larger, higher quality wetland systems which will provide more ecological function to the wildlife that may use the site. 3.3 Wetland Compensation The wetland to be enhanced will occur along the eastern portion of the project strategically connecting to and expanding the existing wildlife corridor and wetlands along the eastern portion of several properties. Discharge flows will be maintained to the east to continue the hydrological conditions in the adjacent preserved wetlands. Additionally, the wetland mitigation plan includes the purchase forested, freshwater credits from an approved Mitigation Bank to offset the remaining unavoidable function loss for the project. Mitigation Area A (Wetland Enhancement A); 1.05 acres Mitigation Area A is the forested wetland containing the pre-dominance of cypress wetland along the eastern portion of the property. The preserve area is also aligned with the adjacent properties preserve areas along this wildlife corridor. A number of larger trees were downed showing signs of subsidence. Nuisance and exotic vegetation has infested the main portion of the wetland and include melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and earleaf acacia as the canopy. Mid-story and shrub strata are very similar with the predominance of exotic vegetation along with downy rose myrtle. The proposed mitigation will include the enhancement of the Wetland A through the removal of nuisance and exotic vegetation to improve the quality of vegetation and allow native vegetation to recruit. In addition, placement of the stormwater lake adjacent to the preserve area will along for proper wetland hydrology which appears to be currently impacted. On-going maintenance activities will ensure nuisance and exotic vegetation is within the County’s native habitat preserve compliance. 4 Listed Species Concerns During the March 2016 listed species surveys, Cardno ecologists conducted meandering pedestrian transects throughout the Project Site to determine the presence and relative abundance of species Hamilton Place Environmental Narrative October 2016 Cardno 6 Hamilton_Place_Rezone_Environmental_Narrative_Final_10182016 considered Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern by FWC under Rule 68A-27 of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) under 50 CFR 17 & 23. All surveys were performed in general accordance with the methodologies outlined in the Florida Wildlife Conservation Guide (2011), developed by FWC, USFWS, and the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI). Cardno ecologists also conducted surveys of all habitats within the Project Site for listed wildlife and plant species that are known to have the potential to occur within Collier County (Tables 4-1 and 4-2). An aerial showing the survey transects performed on the Project Site is provided as Figure 10. The design of the survey was focused on the species likely to occur on the Project Site. These species include, but are not limited to, bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus), and Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). All wetland habitats were surveyed for wading birds and American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Table 4-1. Listed Wildlife Species With Potential to Occur on the Livingston Lakes Project Site in Collier County, Florida. Common Name Scientific Name Legal Status Preferred Habitat Survey Results USFWS FWC Reptiles American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis T (S/A) -----Inhabits marshes, rivers, lakes, and ponds. No individuals were observed and none would be expected with a lack of open water habitat. Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon couperi T -----Inhabits gopher tortoise habitat. No individuals were observed and are not likely to occur on the Project Site due to lack of observed gopher tortoise burrows. Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus C T Inhabitssandhills,xeric oak scrub, sand pine scrub, and scrubby flatwoods. During the 20% survey, no gopher tortoise burrows were observed. No habitat exists on the site. Amphibians Gopher frog Lithobates capito ----- SSC Inhabits xeric oak scrub and sand pine scrub and breeds in shallow grassy ponds or ditches. Uses gopher tortoise burrows No individuals observed. Due to the lack of observed gopher tortoise burrows and acceptable breeding habitat, occurrence of this species is highly unlikely within the Project Site. Mammals Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia ----- T Inhabits cypress, slash pine savanna, mangrove swamps, tropical hardwood forest, live oak woods, coastal broadleaf evergreen hammocks, and suburban areas. No individuals were observed. The Project Site does not provide adequate habitat to support this species. Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus E ---- Semitropical forests, pineland, mangrove habitats, golf courses and neighborhoods Species specific survey are currently underway. This species has the potential to occur within the Project Site. Florida panther Puma concolor coryi E ---- Large forested communities and wetlands No individuals were observed. The Project Site does not provide adequate habitat to support this species. Birds Florida burrowing owl Athene cunicularia floridana ----- SSC Inhabits sandhills, ruderal communities, pastureland, dry prairie, and utility corridors. No individuals were observed and the species is unlikely to occur on the Project Site. Hamilton Place Environmental Narrative October 2016 Cardno 7 Hamilton_Place_Rezone_Environmental_Narrative_Final_10182016 Common Name Scientific Name Legal Status Preferred Habitat Survey Results USFWS FWC Little blue heron Egretta caerulea ----- SSC Inhabits marshes, swamps, ponds, estuaries, and rivers. Nests in shrubs and small trees. No individuals were observed but the species could occur on the Project Site. Snowy egret Egretta thula ----- SSC Inhabits marshes, swamps, ponds, estuaries, and rivers. Nests in shrubs and small trees. No individuals were observed but the species could occur on the Project Site. Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor ----- SSC Inhabits marshes, swamps, ponds, estuaries, and rivers. Nests in shrubs and small trees. No individuals were observed but the species could occur on the Project Site. Reddish Egret Egretta caerulea ----- SSC Inhabits freshwater lakes, marshes, swamps, and streams. Nests in woody vegetation, including cypress, willow, black maple, mangrove, and cabbage palm. No individuals were and occurrence is unlikely on the Project Site. White ibis Eudocimus albus ----- SSC Inhabits marshes, swamps, ponds, estuaries, and rivers. Nests in shrubs and small trees. No individuals were observed but the species could occur on the Project Site. Florida sandhill crane Grus canadensis pratensis ----- T Breeds in emergent palustrine wetlands and forages in pastures. No individuals were observed but the species could occur on the Project Site. Least tern Sternula antillarum ----- T Inhabits estuaries and bays along coastal areas. No individuals were observed and the species is unlikely to occur on the Project Site. Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus *BGPA ---- Nests in trees or structures along coasts, rivers and lakes. No individuals observed and no nests documented on the Project Site. Wood stork Mycteria americana T ---- Inhabits estuarine or freshwater wetlands; nest in tops of trees in cypress or mangrove swamps. No individuals were observed but the species could occur on the Project Site. Note: C: Candidate species for Federal listing E: Endangered T: Threatened SSC: Species of Special Concern T(S/A): Threatened, Similar in Appearance *Bald eagles are afforded protection under the federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Hamilton Place Environmental Narrative October 2016 Cardno 8 Hamilton_Place_Rezone_Environmental_Narrative_Final_10182016 Table 4-2. Listed Plant Species With Potential to Occur on the Livingston Lakes Project Site in Collier County, Florida. Common Name Scientific Name Legal Status Preferred Habit Summary USFWS FWC RARE Cow horn orchid Cyrtopodium punctatum N E Tropical hammock, cypress strand. None were observed, habitat occurs onsite. Curtiss's milkweed Asclepias curtissii N E Sandy well-drained soils in scrub habitat. None were observed, No habitat occurs onsite. Clamshell orchid Encyclia cochleata var triandra N E Live oak, cypress swamps and hammocks. None were observed, habitat occurs onsite. Ghost orchid Polyrrhiza lindenii N E Cypress swamps and wet hammocks. None were observed, habitat occurs onsite. West coast prickly apple Harrisia gracilis N E Sandy well-drained soils in scrub habitat. None were observed, No habitat occurs onsite. LESS RARE Butterfly orchid Encyclia tampensis N E Cypress swamps and wet hammocks. None were observed, habitat occurs onsite. Giant wild-pine Tillandsia utriculata N E Cypress swamps and wet hammocks. Observed in the cypress habitat. Will be relocated to preserve. Inflated wild- pine Tillandsia balbisiana N E Cypress swamps and wet hammocks. None were observed, habitat occurs onsite. Stiff-leaved wild- pine Tillandsia fasciculata N E Cypress swamps and wet hammocks. None were observed, habitat occurs onsite. Twisted air plant Tillandsia flexuosa N E Cypress swamps and wet hammocks. None were observed, habitat occurs onsite. Note: E: Endangered T: Threatened N: Not Listed 4.1 Listed Species Survey Results No listed wildlife species were observed on the Project Site during the survey observations, and it is unlikely such species are present due to the intensive development in the vicinity and the disturbed habitats present on the Project Site. According to the FWC Bald Eagle Nest Locator Database, there are no known nests within 2 miles of the Project Site. Common species observed or evidence of presence included eastern cottontail rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus), eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carlinensis), armadillo burrow (Dasypus novemcinctus), red- shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus), osprey (Pandion haliaetus), red-bellied woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus), cat scratch marking on trees, and predated birds. Gopher Tortoise Survey On March 17, 2016, Cardno FWC-Gopher Tortoise Agents conducted field surveys on the Project Site to complete a minimum 20 percent survey to locate gopher tortoise burrows to estimate the density of gopher tortoises in upland habitats. The tortoise survey was conducted in accordance with the standard Hamilton Place Environmental Narrative October 2016 Cardno 9 Hamilton_Place_Rezone_Environmental_Narrative_Final_10182016 methodology from the Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (FWC 2015). All potentially suitable habitats throughout the Project Site were examined for potential presence. During the survey, no gopher tortoise or gopher tortoise burrows were observed (Figure 10). Due to the limited suitable habitat on the site, it is determined that this species would not be present. 4.2 Listed Plant Survey Cardno surveyed for plant species listed by the LDC Section 3.04.03. Table 5-2 provides the listed plant species known to occur or have the potential to occur in Collier County, Florida. Meandering pedestrian transects were traversed throughout all potentially suitable habitats to identify any listed plant species occurring on the Project Site. There were several bromeliads and airplants located within the cypress wetland, but the plants were not flowering and could not be determined as to species. Listed plants listed in Table 5-2 as Rare and Less Rare will be relocated to on-site preserves. A detailed survey will be conducted prior to Site Development Plan and a relocation plan will be submitted in accordance with Section 3.05.00 of the LDC. Hamilton Place Project FIGURES 3905 Crescent Park Drive, Riverview, FL 33578 USAPhone (+1) 813-664-4500 Fax (+1) 813-664-0440 www.cardno.com Figure 1. Location MapWCI Communities - Hamilton Place ProjectCollier County, Florida This m a p a n d a ll da ta co n ta in ed w ithin a re sup p lied a sis w ith n o w a rra n ty. Ca rdn o , In c. exp ressly discla im sresp o n sibility fo r da m a ges o r lia bility fro m a n y cla im stha t m a y a rise o ut o f the use o r m isuse o f this m a p . It isthe so le resp o n sibility o f the user to determ in e if theda ta o n this m a p m eets the user’s n eeds. This m a p w a sn o t crea ted a s survey da ta , n o r sho uld it be used a ssuch. It is the user’s resp o n sibility to o bta in p ro p ersurvey da ta , p rep a red by a licen sed surveyo r, w hererequired by la w .r Sec 18Tw p 49S Rn g 26E Da ta So urce:ESRI File Pa th: Q:\Un itedSta tes\Flo rida \Sa ra so ta \WCI Co m m un ities\Livin gsto n _Ro a d\w o rkin g\a rcm a p \Livin gsto n _Lo ca tio n _A_20160609.m xdDa te Revised: 6/20/2016GIS An a lyst: a da m .ba usch Da te Crea ted: 6/20/2016 Pro ject Bo un da ry - 9.8 a c. ± 0 500 1,000 Feet 0 160 320 Meters -81.749345,26.204893 Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed 3905 Crescent Park Drive, Riverview, FL 33578 USAPhone (+1) 813-664-4500 Fax (+1) 813-664-0440 www.cardno.com Figure 2. USGS MapWCI Communities - Hamilton Place Project Collier County, Florida This m ap and all data contained w ithin are supplied asis w ith no w arranty. Cardno, Inc. expressly disclaim sresponsibility for dam ages or liability from any claim sthat m ay arise out of the use or m isuse of this m ap. It isthe sole responsibility of the user to determ ine if thedata on this m ap m eets the user’s needs. This m ap w asnot created as survey data, nor should it be used assuch. It is the user’s responsibility to obtain propersurvey data, prepared by a licensed surveyor, w hererequired by law .r Sec 18, 13Tw p 49S Rng 26E,25E Data Source:U SGS File Path: Q:\U nitedStates\Florida\Sarasota\WCI Com m unities\Livingston_Road\w ork ing\arcm ap\WCI_Livingston_U SGS_A_20160227.m xdDate Revised: 6/27/2016GIS Analyst: adam .bausch Date Created: 6/27/2016 Project Boundary - 9.8 ac. ± 0 1,250 2,500 Feet 0 410 820 Meters -81.74953826.204940 3905 Crescent Park Drive, Riverview, FL 33578 USAPhone (+1) 813-664-4500 Fax (+1) 813-664-0440 www.cardno.com Figure 3. 1973 Aerial MapWCI Communities - Hamilton Place Project Collier County, Florida This m ap and all data contained w ithin are supplied asis w ith no w arranty. Cardno, Inc. expressly disclaim sresponsibility for dam ages or liability from any claim sthat m ay arise out of the use or m isuse of this m ap. It isthe sole responsibility of the user to determ ine if thedata on this m ap m eets the user’s needs. This m ap w asnot created as survey data, nor should it be used assuch. It is the user’s responsibility to obtain propersurvey data, prepared by a licensed surveyor, w hererequired by law .r Sec 18, 13Tw p 49S Rng 26E,25E Data Source:FDOT, 1973 File Path: Q:\U nitedStates\Florida\Sarasota\WCI Com m unities\Livingston_Road\w ork ing\arcm ap\WCI_Livingston_1973_Aerial_A_20160223.m xdDate Revised: 6/27/2016GIS Analyst: adam .bausch Date Created: 6/27/2016 Project Boundary - 9.9 ac. ± 0 125 250 Feet 0 40 80 Meters 3905 Crescent Park Drive, Riverview, FL 33578 USAPhone (+1) 813-664-4500 Fax (+1) 813-664-0440 www.cardno.com Figure 4. 1985 Aerial MapWCI Communities - Hamilton Place Project Collier County, Florida This m ap and all data contained w ithin are supplied asis w ith no w arranty. Cardno, Inc. expressly disclaim sresponsibility for dam ages or liability from any claim sthat m ay arise out of the use or m isuse of this m ap. It isthe sole responsibility of the user to determ ine if thedata on this m ap m eets the user’s needs. This m ap w asnot created as survey data, nor should it be used assuch. It is the user’s responsibility to obtain propersurvey data, prepared by a licensed surveyor, w hererequired by law .r Sec 18, 13Tw p 49S Rng 26E,25E Data Source:FDOT, 1985 File Path: Q:\U nitedStates\Florida\Sarasota\WCI Com m unities\Livingston_Road\w ork ing\arcm ap\WCI_Livingston_1985_Aerial_A_20160223.m xdDate Revised: 6/27/2016GIS Analyst: adam .bausch Date Created: 6/27/2016 Project Boundary - 9.9 ac. ± 0 125 250 Feet 0 40 80 Meters 3905 Crescent Park Drive, Riverview, FL 33578 USAPhone (+1) 813-664-4500 Fax (+1) 813-664-0440 www.cardno.com Figure 5. 1993 Aerial MapWCI Communities - Hamilton Place Project Collier County, Florida This m ap and all data contained w ithin are supplied asis w ith no w arranty. Cardno, Inc. expressly disclaim sresponsibility for dam ages or liability from any claim sthat m ay arise out of the use or m isuse of this m ap. It isthe sole responsibility of the user to determ ine if thedata on this m ap m eets the user’s needs. This m ap w asnot created as survey data, nor should it be used assuch. It is the user’s responsibility to obtain propersurvey data, prepared by a licensed surveyor, w hererequired by law .r Sec 18, 13Tw p 49S Rng 26E,25E Data Source:FDOT, 1993 File Path: Q:\U nitedStates\Florida\Sarasota\WCI Com m unities\Livingston_Road\w ork ing\arcm ap\WCI_Livingston_1993_Aerial_A_20160223.m xdDate Revised: 6/27/2016GIS Analyst: adam .bausch Date Created: 6/27/2016 Project Boundary - 9.9 ac. ± 0 160 320 Feet 0 50 100 Meters 625E4 110 621E2 619/621 422 422 422 424 510 422H/625 510 3905 Crescent Park Drive, Riverview, FL 33578 USAPhone (+1) 813-664-4500 Fax (+1) 813-664-0440 www.cardno.com Figure 6. Land Use MapWCI Communities - Hamilton Place Project Collier County, Florida This m a p a nd all d ata contained within are supplied a sis with no wa rra nty. Card no, Inc. e xpre ssly d iscla im sre sponsibility for d a m ag e s or liability from any cla im stha t m a y a rise out of the use or m isuse of this m a p. It isthe sole re sponsibility of the use r to d e te rm ine if thed a ta on this m ap m e ets the use r’s ne e d s. This m a p wa snot crea te d as surve y d a ta, nor should it be used a ssuch. It is the use r’s re sponsibility to obta in prope rsurve y d a ta , pre pa re d by a lice nsed surve yor, whe rere quire d by law.r Se c 18, 13Twp 49S Rng 26E,25E Data Source :ESRI, SFWMD File P a th: Q:\United Sta tes\Florid a\Sa ra sota \WCI Com m unitie s\Living ston_ Roa d \working \a rcm a p\WCI_ Living ston_Ca rd no_ LU_A_ 20161031.m xdDa te Re vise d : 11/1/2016GIS Ana lyst: Ja m e s.Bottig er Da te Cre a te d : 11/1/2016 0 150 300 Feet 0 46 92 Meters P roje ct Bound a ry - 9.75 a c. ± Jurisd ictiona l We tla nd a nd OSWs (6.51 a c.) FLUCFCS Code Description Acres Percent of Site110 Low Density Residential 1.61 16.5%422 Brazilian Pepper 1.44 14.8%424 Melaleuca 0.19 1.9%UPLANDS 3.24 33.2%422H/ 625 Hydric Brazilian Pepper / Flatwoods 0.34 3.5%510 Ditch/ Swale 0.45 4.6%619 /621 Exotic Wetland Hardwoods / Cypress 1.27 13.0%621E2 Cypress w/ Exotics 25-49%1.42 14.6%625E4 Hydric Pine Flatwoods w/ Exotics > 75% 3.03 31.1%WETLANDS / OSW 6.51 66.8% FLUCFCS TABLE 002 S ource: Esri, Dig italGlobe, GeoEye, Earth star Geog raph ics, CNES /Airbus DS , US DA, US GS , AEX,Getm apping , Aerog rid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and th e GIS User Com m unity 3905 Crescent Park Drive, Riverview, FL 33578 USAPhone (+1) 813-664-4500 Fax (+1) 813-664-0440 www.cardno.com WCI Communities - Hamilton Place ProjectCollier County, Florida Figure 7. NRCS Soils MapTh is m ap and all data contained with in are supplied asis with no warranty. Cardno, Inc. expressly disclaim sresponsibility for dam ag es or liability from any claim sth at m ay arise out of th e use or m isuse of th is m ap. It isth e sole responsibility of th e user to determ ine if th edata on th is m ap m eets th e user’s needs. Th is m ap wasnot created as survey data, nor sh ould it be used assuch . It is th e user’s responsibility to obtain propersurvey data, prepared by a licensed surveyor, wh ererequired by law.r S ec 18, 13Twp 49S Rng 26E,25E Data S ource:ES RI, NRCS File Path : Q:\UnitedS tates\Florida\S arasota\WCI Com m unities\Living ston_Road\working \arcm ap\WCI_Living ston_S oils_A_20160223.m xdDate Revised: 6/20/2016GIS Analyst: adam .bausch Date Created: 6/20/2016 Project Boundary - 9.9 ac. ± NRCS S oils 002 - HOLOPAW FINE S AND, LIMES TONE S UBS TRATUM - 9.9 ac. 0 75 150 Feet 0 25 50 Meters 00287920000 00287880001 00287840009 00287600003 00287600003 00287600003 0028760000300287840009002879200000028760000300287880001 625E4 110 621E2 619/621 422 422 422 424 510 422H/625 510 3905 Crescent Park Drive, Riverview, FL 33578 USAPhone (+1) 813-664-4500 Fax (+1) 813-664-0440 www.cardno.com Figure 8. Native Vegetation Assessment Map WCI Communities - Hamilton Place Project Collier County, Florida Th is m ap and all data containe d with in are s upplie d asis with no warranty. Cardno, Inc. e xpre s s ly dis claim sre s pons ibility for dam ag e s or liability from any claim sth at m ay aris e out of th e us e or m is us e of th is m ap. It isth e s ole re s pons ibility of th e us e r to de te rm ine if th edata on th is m ap m e e ts th e us e r’s ne e ds . Th is m ap wasnot cre ate d as s urve y data, nor s h ould it be us e d ass uch . It is th e us e r’s re s pons ibility to obtain prope rs urve y data, pre pare d by a lice ns e d s urve yor, wh e rere quire d by law.r Se c 18, 13Twp 49S R ng 26E,25E Data Source :ESR I, SFWMD File Path : Q:\Unite dState s \Florida\Saras ota\WCI Com m unitie s \Living s ton_R oad\working \arcm ap\WCI_Living s ton_Cardno_County_NVAM_A_20161101.m xdDate R e vis e d: 11/1/2016GIS Analys t: Jam e s .Bottig e r Date Cre ate d: 11/1/2016 0 150 300 Feet 0 46 92 Meters Proje ct Boundary - 9.75 ac. ± County Parce ls Eas e m e nt by Parce ls FLUCFCS Code Description Acres Native Veg Percent of Site110 Low Density Residential 1.61 N 16.5%422 Brazilian Pepper (Within Easement or Single-family Resident) 0.78 N 8.0%422 Brazilian Pepper (Previously Cleared)0.66 Y 6.8%424 Melaleuca (Within Easement)0.05 N 0.5%424 Melaleuca (Previously Cleared)0.14 Y 1.4%UPLANDS 3.24 0.80 acres of Uplands 33.2%422H/ 625 Hydric Brazilian Pepper / Flatwoods (Previously Cleared) 0.34 Y 3.5%510 Ditch/ Swale (Within Easement or Single-family Resident) 0.37 N 3.8%510 Ditch/ Swale (Previously Cleared)0.08 Y 0.8%619 /621 Exotic Wetland Hardwoods / Cypress (Within Easement) 0.01 N 0.1%619 /621 Exotic Wetland Hardwoods / Cypress (Previously Cleared) 1.27 Y 13.0%621E2 Cypress w/ Exotics 25-49%1.42 Y 14.6% 625E4 Hydric Pine Flatwoods w/ Exotics > 75% (Within Easement or Parcel Not Previously Cleared)0.47 N 4.8%625E4 Hydric Pine Flatwoods w/ Exotics > 75% (Previously Cleared) 2.55 Y 26.2%WETLANDS / OSW 6.51 5.66 acres of Wetlands 66.8%TOTAL 9.75 6.46 acre of Native Vegetation 100% FLUCFCS TABLE Wetland A (4.79 ac.±) Wetland B (1.27 ac.±) OSW F (0.21 ac.±) OSW E (0.10 ac.±) OSW C (0.07 ac.±) OSW D (0.07 ac.±) 3905 Crescent Park Drive, Riverview, FL 33578 USAPhone (+1) 813-664-4500 Fax (+1) 813-664-0440 www.cardno.com Figure 9. Wetland/OSW ID MapWCI Communities - Hamilton Place Project Collier County, Florida Th is m ap and all data contained within are su pplied asis with no warranty. Cardno, Inc. expressly disclaim sresponsibility for dam ag es or liability from any claim sth at m ay arise ou t of th e u se or m isu se of this m ap. It isth e sole responsibility of th e u ser to determ ine if thedata on th is m ap m eets the u ser’s needs. Th is m ap wasnot created as su rvey data, nor sh ou ld it be u sed assu ch. It is th e u ser’s responsibility to obtain propersu rvey data, prepared by a licensed su rveyor, wh ererequ ired by law.r S ec 18, 13Twp 49S Rng 26E,25E Data S ou rce:ES RI, S FWMD File Path : Q:\UnitedS tates\Florida\S arasota\WCI Com m u nities\Living ston_Road\working \arcm ap\WCI_Living ston_Wetland_OS W_A_20161101.m xdDate Revised: 11/1/2016GIS Analyst: Jam es.Bottig er Date Created: 11/1/2016 Project Bou ndary - 9.75 ac. ± Wetlands and Oth er S u rface Waters 0 150 300 Feet 0 46 92 Meters 625M3 110 621M3 411M2 619 422 422 422422 814 510 510 510 422 Sourc e : Esri, DigitalGlobe , Ge oEye , Earthstar Ge ographic s, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX,Ge tm apping, Ae rogrid , IGN, IGP , swisstopo, and the GIS Use r Com m unity 3905 Crescent Park Drive, Riverview, FL 33578 USAPhone (+1) 813-664-4500 Fax (+1) 813-664-0440 www.cardno.com WCI Communities - Hamilton Place ProjectCollier County, Florida Figure 10. Wildlife Transect MapThis m ap and all d ata c ontaine d within are supplie d asis with no warranty. Card no, Inc. e xpre ssly d isc laim sre sponsibility for d am age s or liability from any c laim sthat m ay arise out of the use or m isuse of this m ap. It isthe sole re sponsibility of the use r to d e te rm ine if thed ata on this m ap m e e ts the use r’s ne e d s. This m ap wasnot c re ate d as surve y d ata, nor should it be use d assuc h. It is the use r’s re sponsibility to obtain prope rsurve y d ata, pre pare d by a lic e nse d surve yor, whe rere q uire d by law.r Se c 18, 13Twp 49S Rng 26E,25E Data Sourc e :ESRI, SFWMD File P ath: Q:\Unite d State s\Florid a\Sarasota\WCI Com m unitie s\Livingston_ Road \working\arc m ap\WCI_ Livingston_ Wild life _ Transe c t_ A_ 20160323.m xdDate Re vise d : 6/20/2016GIS Analyst: ad am .bausc h Date Cre ate d : 6/20/2016 P roje c t Bound ary - 9.9 ac . ± Transe c ts Land Use 110 - Low De nsity Re sid e ntial - 1.9 ac . ± 411M2 – P ine Flatwood s/ Me lale uc a Invad e d (25-50%) - 0.8 ac . ± 422 - Brazilian P e ppe r - 1.3 ac . ± 510 - Ditc h / Swale - 0.2 ac . ± 619 - Exotic We tland s Hard wood - 0.8 ac . ± 621M3 - Cypre ss/ Me lale uc a Invad e d (51-75%) - 0.9 ac . ± 625M3 - Hyd ric P ine Flatwood s/ Me lale uc a Invad e d (51-75%) - 3.9 ac . ± 814 - Road s and Highways - 0.1 ac . ± 0 75 150 Feet 0 25 50 Meters Hamilton Place Project APPENDICIES Hamilton Place Project APPENDIX A TAMMY C. LYDAY Page 1 of 4 www.cardno.com Tammy C. Lyday Current Position Project Scientist Discipline Areas > Wetland and Environmental Permitting > Environmental Feasibility Studies, Wetland Delineations, Habitat Assessment, and Listed Species Surveys > Mitigation Planning and Design > Wetland Impact Assessments > State, Federal and Local Government Regulations Years' Experience 17 Years Joined Cardno 2014 Education > MS, Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, University of Florida, 1997 > BS, Zoology, University of Florida, 1993 Summary of Experience Ms. Tammy Lyday has extensive regulatory experience in the Southwest Florida region. She has over 17 years of project management experience as a consultant with expertise in environmental feasibility studies, environmental planning and strategic site design, wetland and environmental resource permitting, wetland delineations and hydroperiod analysis, habitat assessments, listed species surveys and permitting, mitigation planning and design, and permit compliance. She has managed a number of residential and commercial projects for private developers, as well as multiple utility and roadway projects for government bodies. Significant Projects Land Development Projects Project Scientist –Palmer Ranch DRI Increment XXIII, DiVosta Homes, LP – Sarasota County, Florida Ms. Lyday served as project scientist for the 224-acre Palmer Ranch Increment XXIII residential development. Services included wetland delineation, habitat mapping, listed species assessment, entitlement support (Development of Regional Impact Incremental Development Approval and Rezoning), environmental planning, and local, state and federal wetlands permitting. Detail mitigation plan involved the creation of wetlands adjacent to a tributary of South Creek. Project Scientist – Palmer Ranch DRI Increment XXII, Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc. – Sarasota County, Florida Ms. Lyday served as project scientist for the 103-acre Palmer Ranch Increment XXII residential development. Services included wetland delineation, habitat mapping, listed species assessment, entitlement support (Development of Regional Impact Incremental Development Approval and Rezoning), environmental planning, and local, state and federal wetlands permitting. Project Manager – IslandWalk 250-Acre Addition, DiVosta Homes, LP – Sarasota County, Florida Ms. Lyday served as project manager for environmental services in support of the IslandWalk residential subdivision. Services included due diligence analyses, wetland delineation, habitat mapping, listed species assessment, environmental planning, local, state and federal wetlands permitting support, and wetland mitigation design. Project Manager – Village on the Trail,Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc. – Sarasota County, Florida Ms. Lyday serves as project manager for environmental services in support of the VOTT residential subdivision. Services included due diligence analyses, habitat mapping, listed species assessment, environmental planning, local, state and federal wetlands permitting support, and gopher tortoise permitting and relocations. Project Manager – Arbor Lakes Addition,Taylor Morrison of Florida, Inc. – Sarasota County, Florida Ms. Lyday serves as project manager for environmental services in support of the expansion of the Arbor Lakes residential subdivision. Services included due diligence TAMMY C. LYDAY Page 2 of 3 Professional Registrations > Gopher Tortoise Authorized Agent (Permit # GTA-12- 00031A) > Commercial and Natural Areas Applicator License (License # CM21637) > Certified Stormwater Erosion and Sediment Control Inspector (Ins # 23871) Affiliations > Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals (Acting Secretary) analyses, habitat mapping, listed species assessment, environmental planning, local, state and federal wetlands permitting support. The project also included measurement of 21 Grand Trees located on the 35-acre site. Project Scientist – Palmer Ranch A8 & A9, D.R. Horton – Sarasota County, Florida Ms. Lyday serves as project scientist for due diligence analyses, wetland delineations and environmental planning associated with a multi-family residential subdivision. Services included measurement of 31 Grand Trees located on the 20-acre site. Project Scientist – Palmer Ranch B9, D.R. Horton – Sarasota County, Florida Ms. Lyday serves as project scientist for due diligence analyses, wetland delineations and environmental planning associated with a multi-family residential subdivision. Services included measurement of 22 Grand Trees located on the 30-acre site. Roadway and Utility Projects Project Manager – 45th Street Improvements – Manatee County, Florida Ms. Lyday’s responsibilities included submittal of the permit application responses to the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The project received extensive public comment; therefore, a detailed Alternative Analysis was required by the USACE. The mitigation plan detail the creation of 0.5 acres of freshwater herbaceous wetland adjacent to Gap Creek. Project Manager – Whitfield Ave Water Main – Manatee County, Florida Project Manager for the environmental portion of the environmental permitting. The project included the installation of a 16-inch water main with 2,200 linear feet of pipe. Also included was the submittal of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) FDEP permit application and received a No Permit Required response from the USACE. The FDEP permit was issued in less than two months. Project Manager – Burnt Store Road Widening – Charlotte County, Florida Ms. Lyday’s responsibilities included wetland delineation, wildlife surveys, preparation and submittal of permit application to the SWFWMD and USACE, and coordination with the FDEP regarding sovereign submerged lands. State and federal permitting were completed for the safety improvement project for the entire corridor. Phase I of the four- lane expansion project involved environmental assessments, alignment corridor study, agency meetings, and ERP permitting. A pond siting and alignment study was completed for Phase II of the project. Project Manager – Regional Integrated Loop, Phase 1A – Charlotte County, Florida Project Manager for environmental aspects of design, permitting, and construction for the installation of 12 miles of 24-inch water pipeline, including a 6,400-foot long crossing of the Peace River. Ms. Lyday worked closely with engineers during the design, permitting, and the construction portions of the project. She coordinated with FDEP and USACE to obtain environmental permits. She conducted several field surveys, including benthic surveys of the Peace River to locate sensitive environmental features, such as wetlands and wildlife that may occur within the pipeline project area. This project involved surveying, permitting, and relocation, both on-site and off-site of 160 gopher tortoise burrows. Ms. Lyday worked closely with USFWS, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), and Charlotte County to coordinate construction adjacent to Florida scrub jay habitat and a bald eagle nest. She was the project manager for the environmental permit compliance during the construction in the Peace River as the turbidity monitor and manatee and small-toothed sawfish observer. TAMMY C. LYDAY Page 3 of 3 Project Manager – Regional Integrated Loop, Phase 3A – Sarasota County, Florida Project Manager for environmental aspects of design, permitting, and construction for the installation of 8.5 miles of 48-inch water pipeline, including a tunnel crossing of the Myakka River. Ms. Lyday worked closely with engineers during the design, permitting, and construction portions of the project. She coordinated with FDEP and USACE to obtain environmental permits. Construction oversight involved the relocation of gopher tortoises that occur within the construction area, documentation of existing conditions of wetlands and uplands located within the Carlton Reserve and the Myakka River Wild and Scenic Designated Area prior to construction, attended construction meetings pertaining to the pipeline installation, met with FDEP, USACE, and Sarasota County as a representative of the Authority pertaining to the project, conduct vegetation monitoring for compliance with FDEP and USACE permits, and oversee quarterly maintenance for the treatment of exotic and nuisance vegetation located within the impacted wetland areas within the Carlton Reserve. Stormwater Improvement Projects Project Scientist – City of Venice Flamingo and Deertown Gully Outfall Modification – Venice, Florida Environmental Scientist assisting with securing state and federal permits for demucking and exotic/debris vegetation removal for two existing Gulf of Mexico stormwater outfall channels. Special consideration was given to minimize potential impacts to the existing wetland system, which consists largely of red mangroves. A system of geomats and native vegetation were used to stabilize the bank slopes at the outfall to the Gulf. This project involved close coordination with SWFWMD, USACE and FDEP for fast-track permitting to meet state funding deadlines. HCP Development Project Scientist – Casey Key Geotextile Container Project – Sarasota, Florida Environmental Scientist assisting with the preparation of the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for a geotextile container and the dune enhancement project which aims to protect, preserve, and mitigate for impacts to sea turtles as a result of the project in accordance with Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act. Biologist responsible for conducting annual vegetation monitoring, design and oversee the vegetation planting after sand placement events and generate annual sea turtle monitoring report to the agencies. Certifications > Project Manager Professional (PMP) (Inactive) > PADI certified scuba diver Continuing Education > Summer Grass Identification Workshop > Environmental Permitting Summer School > Hydric Soils & Wetland Delineation Workshop > Wetland Assessment UMAM Training > 38-Hour ACOE Wetland Delineation & Management Training Hamilton Place Project APPENDIX B APPENDICIES ANDREW M. FUDDY Page 1 of 4 www.cardno.com Andrew M. Fuddy Current Position Senior Staff Ecologist Discipline Areas > Wildlife Ecology > Restoration & Mitigation Planning > Wildlife Permitting > Wetland Delineation > Wetland Permitting > Water Quality Assessments > Freshwater & Marine Ecology > Project Oversight & Planning > Construction Oversight > Permit Compliance Years' Experience 10 Joined Cardno 2004 Education > BS, Environmental Science, University of Tampa, 2005 > AA, Liberal Arts, Hillsborough Community College, 2002 Continuing Education And Certifications > FFWCC, Certified Gopher Tortoise Agent, GTA 09- 00073, May 2009 Summary of Experience Mr. Andrew Fuddy has experience in ornithology, wildlife ecology, environmental permitting, and community ecology throughout Florida’s ecosystems. He is experienced in assessing and developing strategic conservation planning and habitat management for listed species for large land holdings throughout Florida. Specific areas of expertise includes listed species planning; assessing projects for potential listed species issues and providing foresight in the listed species permitting process, managing and conducting biological resource inventories, wetland delineation, wetland permitting, mitigation monitoring, construction oversight and habitat restoration planning and monitoring. His primary responsibilities are managing projects that involve listed species inventories, conservation planning, and environmental and listed species permitting. He also has a vast knowledge of surveying and permitting for listed species that occur throughout Florida and the southeastern United States. This includes many years of experience surveying for, Florida grasshopper sparrow, crested caracara, Florida Scrub-jay, Florida burrowing owl, sand and blue-tailed mole skinks, gopher tortoise; including applying various trapping techniques for herpetofauna, avian species, small mammals; camera-assisted gopher tortoise burrow inventories; wildlife relocations; bald eagle monitoring; large project over sight and coordination; habitat restoration and mitigation. Significant Projects Deputy Project Manager, Senior Staff Ecologist – Bio-Fuel Farm Permitting and Planning Osceola County, Florida Mr. Fuddy was instrumental in the permitting process for nearly 40,000 acres of renewable biomass energy production. His responsibilities included providing critical wetland and species conservation planning, written and person agency correspondence and negotiation. The application and permit for this project was the first expedited permit issued of its kind in Florida. Deputy Project Manager, Senior Staff Ecologist – NRCS Northern Everglades – Payment for Environmental Services Project Glades County, Florida Mr. Fuddy was heavily involved in the strategic species and wetland conservation planning on 15,000 of private range and ranchland in Glades County, Florida. The project was part of a payment for Environmental Services Program and was designed to store and treat 30,300 ac-ft of water on private ranchlands near Lake Okeechobee to improve water quality to the lake and adjacent wetland systems. Deputy Project Manager, Senior Staff Ecologist –Everglades Headwaters National Wildlife Refuge and Conservation Area Planning and Osceola County, Florida Mr. Fuddy was instrumental in the strategic planning necessary to assist large private land owners in demonstrating the conservation value of their land as part of the federal government’s land protection plan for the establishment of the 150,000 acre Northern Everglades Headwaters National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) and Conservation Area. The NWR ranked the properties of willing landowners based on many factor to determine the overall potential conservation value in order to determine the need for preservation. The NRW and conservation areas will be acquired and preserved in either fee simple or conservation easement agreements. Because of the size and magnitude of the proposed plan; the coordination and negotiation of many governmental agencies such as, The Department of the Interior and the National Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, ANDREW M. FUDDY Page 2 of 4 The Department of Defense, the U.S. Department of Natural Resources, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, The Nature Conservancy, and several other state and local agencies was necessary. Project Senior Staff Ecologist – Aerial Wildlife and Habitat Surveys Osceola, Brevard, Hillsborough, and Manatee Counties, Florida Mr. Fuddy has conducted aerial helicopter surveys on large land holdings for various wildlife habitat and listed species, including nesting Florida sandhill crane and bald eagle. Project Senior Staff Ecologist – US Army Corps of Engineers Site 1 Impoundment D-525 (L-40 Canal Modifications) Palm Beach County, Florida Mr. Fuddy conducted construction oversight for species listed as Threatened or Endangered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service during the clearing and grubbing phases on the US ACOE L-40 Canal Modifications project as part of the Everglades restoration plan. Project Staff Ecologist – NRDA Wildlife Assessments BP Deepwater Horizon MC252 Incident, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Florida Mr. Fuddy conducted surveys for a wide range of avian species in many different habitats throughout the Gulf region. These surveys include shore bird, secretive marsh bird, and wading bird surveys. He also conducted oversight in the capturing, sampling, banding, and transmitter surveys on affected avian populations. Project Field Ecologist – Florida Burrowing Owl Translocation, Hardee County, Florida Mr. Fuddy assisted in the translocation of Florida burrowing owls for Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC. Responsibilities included burrowing owl surveys, trapping owls on donor sites, banding and taking blood samples from captured birds, and daily monitoring and care of burrowing owls once relocated. Project Field Ecologist – Avian Protection Plan, Hillsborough, Manatee, Polk, Hardee, and Desoto Counties, Florida Mr. Fuddy collected field date for the development of an avian protection plan for Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC. holdings (±400,000 acres) to reduce avian interactions with electrical utilities. Aspects of the plan included design and implementation of a risk assessment methodology using the bald eagle as a flagship species, research and development of construction and retrofitting techniques to make electrical utilities avian-safe, development of company procedures to address avian injuries/mortalities and nest management techniques, and assistance in developing a company employee training program. Project Field Ecologist – Gopher Tortoise Relocations, Hillsborough, Pasco, Polk, Pinellas, Suwannee, Manatee, Hernando, and Citrus Counties, Florida Mr. Fuddy has surveyed, obtained relocation permits from the FWC, excavated tortoises from lands slated to be developed, relocated tortoises to recipient sites, mark/measured/weighted relocated tortoises, and provided relocation reports to Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) for hundreds of gopher tortoise. Project Field Ecologist – Gopher Tortoise Recipient Site Management, Hillsborough, Pasco, Alachua, and Glades Counties, Florida Mr. Fuddy assists in the management of several gopher tortoise recipient sites located throughout Florida. Responsibilities include maintaining and updating site specific application materials for gopher tortoise relocation permits, maintaining individual and population data for tortoises relocated to each recipient site, and oversight of recipient ANDREW M. FUDDY Page 3 of 4 areas to ensure proper site maintenance and that all actions follow FWC guidelines. Project Environmental Specialist – Florida Institute for Phosphate Research Wildlife Study, Hillsborough, Manatee, Hardee, and Polk Counties, Florida Reptile, amphibian, bird, and fish surveys were conducted by Mr. Fuddy at over 60 locations to determine wildlife utilization of reclaimed mining areas. Techniques were varied but included small mammal trapping, anuran call census, and herp arrays. Project Environmental Specialist – Listed Species Assessments on Phosphate Mining Lands, Hillsborough, Manatee, Polk, and Hardee Counties, Florida Mr. Fuddy conducted surveys for listed wildlife, including the Florida scrub-jay, Audubon's crested caracara, gopher tortoise, gopher frog, Florida mouse, and eastern indigo snake. Project Environmental Specialist – Listed Species Assessment for the Ridge Road Development of Regional Impact, Pasco County, Florida Mr. Fuddy conducted listed species surveys for a 5,000-acre proposed development in accordance with the “Wildlife Methodology Guidelines for Completion of the Application for Development Approval” and determined the presence of listed wildlife on the tract. Project Environmental Specialist – Crested Caracara Nest Monitoring for The Mosaic Company, Hardee County, Florida Mr. Fuddy conducted daily caracara nest monitoring during a portion of the breeding season to track nest chronology. Project Environmental Specialist – Gopher Tortoise Relocation, Hillsborough, Pasco, and Sarasota Counties, Florida Mr. Fuddy excavated and relocated gopher tortoises to on-site and off-site mitigation sites. Project Environmental Specialist – Sand Skink Relocation, Polk County, Florida Mr. Fuddy was responsible for daily field work for a study, in conjunction with the University of South Florida, on the translocation of over 550 sand skinks and 41 bluetailed mole skinks from permitted lands to reclaimed sites. He assisted in all aspects of field work and data collection involving the trapping and transport of the skinks. Project Environmental Specialist - Grand Oak Tree Survey, Hillsborough County, Florida Mr. Fuddy conducted surveys to determine the occurrence of grand oaks by measuring and scoring various elements of the tree’s physiology. Project Field Ecologist — Listed Species Permit Coordination, Florida Mr. Fuddy has completed consultations with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) during the permitting process. He has successfully obtained permits for, but not limited to, the following listed species: gopher tortoise, Florida mouse, Florida sandhill crane, sand skink, wading birds, gopher frog, burrowing owl and eastern indigo snake. Project Environmental Specialist – Aerial Photograph Interpretation, Osceola County, Florida Mr. Fuddy conducted an aerial interpretation for wetlands on a 45,000-acre site. Project Environmental Specialist – Cross Bar Ranch Wellfield, Hillsborough County, Florida Mr. Fuddy conducts field collection of water level data, vertebrate wildlife utilization ANDREW M. FUDDY Page 4 of 4 identification, plant community composition studies, and aerial interpretation. Mr. Fuddy has performed wetland and aquatic ecosystem evaluations and monitoring programs, including water quality and sediment sampling. He is experienced in surveying, sampling, and identifying freshwater fish. ANDALUCIATRACT P -1(P re se rve Are a) ANDALUCIATRACT P -2(P re se rve Are a) TRACT E (COMMON AREA) 30' ROW EASEMENT BRY NW OOD CONSERVATION AREA P -1 3905 Crescent Park Drive, Riverview, FL 33578 USAPhone (+1) 813-664-4500 Fax (+1) 813-664-0440 www.cardno.com WCI Communities - Hamilton Place ProjectCollier County, Florida Preserve Area MapThis map and all d ata containe d within are sup p lie d asis with no warranty. Card no, Inc . e xp re ssly d isclaimsre sp onsib ility for d amage s or liab ility from any claimsthat may arise out of the use or misuse of this map . It isthe sole re sp onsib ility of the use r to d e te rmine if thed ata on this map me e ts the use r’s ne e d s. This map wasnot cre ate d as surve y d ata, nor should it b e use d assuc h. It is the use r’s re sp onsib ility to ob tain p rop e rsurve y d ata, p re p are d b y a lice nse d surve yor, whe rere quire d b y law.r Image :ESRI Se c 18, 13Twp 49S Rng 26E,25E Data Source : File P ath: Q:\Unite d State s\Florid a\Sarasota\W CI Communitie s\Livingston_Road \working\arcmap \P re se rve _Are a_Map _A_1_20161101.mxdDate Re vise d : 11/1/2016GIS Analyst: Jame s.Bottige r Date Cre ate d : 11/1/2016 Legend P roje c t Bound ary 30' ROW Ease me ntP re se rve Are a Ap p roximate Conve yanc e Swale Lot Line s 0 200 400 Feet 0 61 122 Meters (1.05 ac) (9.75 ac) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno i Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 855 NW State Road 45, Newberry Insert job reference `` Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Naples – Livingston Road Site 1015 Livingston Road, Naples Collier County, Florida (7025 Nighthawk Drive & Adjacent Parcels) Parcel ID Nos. 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001 and 00287840009 May 2016 Prepared for: WCI Communities 24301 Walden Center Drive Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno ii Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Prepared for: WCI Communities 24301 Walden Center Drive Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Project Name: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Naples – Livingston Road Site 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida (7025 Nighthawk Drive & Adjacent Parcels) Parcel ID Nos. 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001 and 00287840009 Cardno Project No.: 00023-001-52 Date: May 2016 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno iii Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary 1 1.1 Findings and Conclusions 1 1.2 Recommendations 1 2 ASTM Definitions 2 3 Introduction 3 3.1 Purpose 3 3.2 Detailed Scope of Services 3 3.3 Significant Assumptions 4 3.4 Limitations and Exceptions 4 3.5 Special Terms and Conditions (User Reliance) 6 4 Site Description 7 4.1 Location and Legal Description 7 4.2 Surrounding Area General Characteristics 7 4.3 Current Use and Ownership of the Property 7 4.4 Descriptions of Property Improvements 7 5 Owner/User-Provided Information 9 5.1 Title Records 9 5.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) 9 5.3 Specialized Knowledge 9 5.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues 9 5.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information 9 5.6 Reason for Performing Phase I 9 6 Records Review 10 6.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources 10 6.2 Physical Setting Sources 12 6.3 Historical Records Sources 12 6.3.1 Historical Aerial Photographs 13 6.3.2 Property Tax/Appraiser Files 13 6.3.3 Recorded Land Title Records 13 6.3.4 Prior Reports 13 7 Site Reconnaissance 14 7.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions 14 7.2 Hazardous Substance Use, Storage, and Disposal 14 7.3 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) 14 7.4 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) 14 7.5 Other Petroleum Products 14 7.6 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) 14 7.7 Unidentified Substance Containers 14 7.8 Nonhazardous Solid Waste 14 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno iv 7.9 Wastewater 14 7.10 Waste Pits, Ponds and Lagoons 15 7.11 Drains and Sumps 15 7.12 Septic Systems 15 7.13 Stormwater Management System 15 7.14 Wells 15 8 Site Owner Interviews 16 9 Subsurface Vapor Migration 17 10 References 18 11 Qualifications/Signatures of Environmental Professional(s) 19 Figures 1 UGGS/ Site Vicinity Map 2 Site Boundary Map 3 Surrounding Land Use Map 4 National Wetlands Inventory Map 5a-d Historical Aerial Photos Appendices A EDR Agency Database Search Results B Site Visit Photos C Site Owner and End User Interview Questionnaires Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 1 1 Executive Summary Cardno has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the property identified as 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida (Parcel ID Nos. 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001 and 002878400093201). The current address of one of the parcels included in the study area is 7025 Nighthawk Drive, while the other parcels included did not have assigned street addresses at the time of this report. The assessed property is herein referred to as "the subject site/property" or "the site." The site consists of approximately 10 acres of land (as depicted in Figures 1 and 2), with a property use codes of “single family residential” and “acreage – not zoned agricultural.” This assessment was performed to satisfy the requirements of the Client (WCI Communities) and their assigns with respect to potential environmental impairment and liabilities associated with the property due to contamination by hazardous substances, controlled substances or petroleum products on or near the site. This report meets the general requirements for conducting all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership, uses, and environmental conditions of a property, as specified in 40 CFR Part 312, Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries. This work was conducted by or under the responsible charge of an environmental professional as defined in 40 CFR §312.10. Cardno has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the subject site in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 2.0 of this report. 1.1 Findings and Conclusions This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the subject property. Please note: This is a cursory summary of findings. The full report must be read in its entirety for a comprehensive understanding of these conclusions. The ASTM definition of REC (and variations) is included as Section 2 of this report. 1.2 Recommendations  Based on the findings of this investigation, no additional assessment appears warranted at this time.  Please note that the majority of the subject site is vacant, undeveloped land located in close proximity to residential and commercial development. As such, evidence of historical illicit dumping (if any) or a residual heating oil tank would not be apparent/visible as part of this investigation. If evidence is encountered at a later date, proper handling/removal/reporting will be required at that time. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 2 2 ASTM Definitions ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 defines a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) as: “The presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: 1) due to any release to the environment, 2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or 3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.” ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 defines Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CREC) as: “A recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls).” ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 defines a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) as: "A past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted residential use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls." Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 3 3 Introduction 3.1 Purpose The purpose of this Phase I ESA was to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with current and/or historical uses of the property. The scope of work for this Phase I ESA may also include certain potential environmental conditions beyond the scope of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 as listed below. This report documents the findings, opinions and conclusions of the Phase I ESA. 3.2 Detailed Scope of Services This Phase I ESA was conducted in general accordance with the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, consistent with a level of care and skill ordinarily practiced by the environmental consulting profession currently providing similar services under similar circumstances. Significant additions, deletions or exceptions to ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 are noted below or in the corresponding sections of this report. The scope of this assessment included an evaluation of the following: • Physical setting characteristics of the property through a review of referenced sources such as topographic maps and geologic, soils and hydrologic reports. • Usage of the property, adjoining properties and surrounding area through a review of referenced historical sources such as land title records, fire insurance maps, city directories, aerial photographs, prior reports and interviews. • Observations and interviews regarding current property usage and conditions including: the use, treatment, storage, disposal or generation of hazardous substances, petroleum products, hazardous wastes, nonhazardous solid wastes and wastewater. • Usage of adjoining and surrounding area properties and the likely impact of known or suspected releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products from those properties in, on or at the property. • Information in referenced environmental agency databases and local environmental records, within the specified approximate minimum search distance from the property. • Potential for subsurface vapor migration. No additional investigations or other quantitative/qualitative testing were performed as part of this assessment, and no other work was performed that was not required by the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13. These other non-scope issues typically include, but are not limited to: Asbestos, Lead- Based Paint, Radon, Lead-in-Drinking Water, Wetlands, Regulatory Compliance, Cultural and Historic Resources, Industrial Hygiene, Health and Safety, Geotechnical Evaluation, Sinkhole Evaluation, Ecological Resources, Endangered Species, Vapor Intrusion, and Biological Agents. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 4 3.3 Significant Assumptions While this report provides an overview of potential environmental concerns, both past and present, the environmental assessment is limited by the availability of information at the time of the assessment. It is possible that unreported disposal of waste or illegal activities impairing the environmental status of the property may have occurred, which could not be identified. The conclusions and recommendations regarding environmental conditions that are presented in this report are based on a scope of work authorized by the Client. Please note however, that virtually no scope of work, no matter how exhaustive, can identify all contaminants or all conditions above and below ground. Cardno also assumes that the Client and other interested parties will read this report in its entirety. 3.4 Limitations and Exceptions Cardno has prepared this Phase I ESA report using reasonable efforts to identify recognized environmental conditions associated with hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or at the property. Findings contained within this report are based on information collected from observations made on the day(s) of the site reconnaissance and from reasonably ascertainable information obtained from certain public agencies and other referenced sources. The ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 recognizes inherent limitations for Phase I ESAs, including, but not limited to: • Uncertainty Not Eliminated – A Phase I ESA cannot completely eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with any property. • Not Exhaustive – A Phase I ESA is not an exhaustive investigation of the property and environmental conditions on such property. • Past Uses of the Property – Phase I requirements only require review of standard historical sources at five-year intervals. Therefore, past uses of property at less than five-year intervals may not be discovered. Users of this report may refer to ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 for further information regarding these and other limitations. This report is not definitive and should not be assumed to be a complete and/or specific definition of all conditions above or below grade. Current subsurface conditions may differ from the conditions determined by surface observations, interviews and reviews of historical sources. The most reliable method of evaluating subsurface conditions is through intrusive techniques, which are beyond the scope of this report. Information in this report is not intended to be used as a construction document and should not be used for demolition, renovation, or other property construction purposes. Any use of this report by any party, beyond the scope and intent of the original parties, shall be at the sole risk and expense of such user. Cardno makes no representation or warranty that the past or current operations at the property are, or have been, in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and codes. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated. Regardless of the findings stated in this report, Cardno is not responsible for consequences or conditions arising from facts not fully disclosed to Cardno during the assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 5 An independent data research company provided the government agency database referenced in this report. Information on surrounding area properties was requested for approximate minimum search distances and is assumed to be correct and complete unless obviously contradicted by Cardno’s observations or other credible referenced sources reviewed during the assessment. Cardno shall not be liable for any such database firm’s failure to make relevant files or documents p roperly available, to properly index files, or otherwise to fail to maintain or produce accurate or complete records. Cardno makes no warranty, guarantee or certification regarding the quality, accuracy or reliability of any prior report provided to Cardno and discussed in this Phase I ESA report. Cardno expressly disclaims any and all liability for any errors or omissions contained in any prior reports provided to Cardno and discussed in this Phase I ESA report. Cardno used reasonable efforts to identify evidence of aboveground and underground storage tanks and ancillary equipment on the property during the assessment. “Reasonable efforts” were limited to observation of accessible areas, review of referenced public records and interviews. These reasonable efforts may not identify subsurface equipment or evidence hidden from view by things including, but not limited to, vegetation, paving, construction activities, stored materials and landscaping. Any estimates of costs or quantities in this report are approximations for commercial real estate transaction due diligence purposes and are based on the findings, opinions and conclusions of this assessment, which are limited by the scope of the assessment, schedule demands, cost constraints, accessibility limitations and other factors associated with performing the Phase I ESA. Subsequent determinations of costs or quantities may vary from the estimates in this report. The estimated costs or quantities in this report are not intended to be used for financial disclosure related to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 143, FASB Interpretation No. 47, Sarbanes/Oxley Act or any United States Securities and Exchange Commission reporting obligations, and may not be used for such purposes in any form without the express written permission of Cardno. Cardno did not act as a professional title insurance or land surveyor firm as part of this investigation, and makes no guarantee, express or implied, that any land title records acquired or reviewed in this report, or any physical descriptions or depictions of the property in this report, represent a comprehensive definition or precise delineation of property ownership or boundaries. The Environmental Professional Statement in this report does not “certify” the findings contained in this report and is not a legal opinion of such Environmental Professional. The statement is intended to document Cardno’s opinion that an individual meeting the qualifications of an Environmental Professional was involved in the performance of the assessment and that the activities performed by, or under the supervision of, the Environmental Professional were performed in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312 per the methodology in ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and the scope of work for this assessment. Per ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, Section 6, User Responsibilities, the User of this assessment has specific obligations for performing tasks during this assessment that will help identify the possibility of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Failure by the User to fully comply with the requirements may impact their ability to use this report to help qualify for Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Cardno makes no representations or warranties regarding a User’s qualification for protection under any federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 6 In accordance with the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, this report is presumed to be valid for a six-month period. If the report is older than six months, the following information must be updated in order for the report to be valid: (1) regulatory review, (2) site visit, (3) interviews, (4) specialized knowledge and (5) environmental liens search. Reports older than one year may not meet the ASTM Standard PracticE1527-13 and therefore, the entire report must be updated to reflect current conditions and property-specific information. Other limitations and exceptions that are specific to the scope of this report may be found in corresponding sections. 3.5 Special Terms and Conditions (User Reliance) This report is for the use and benefit of, and may be relied upon by the entity(s) identified in the Executive Summary of this report as the Client, as well as any of its affiliates and their respective successors and assigns, in connection with a commercial real estate transaction involving the property, and in accordance with the terms and conditions in place between Cardno and the Client for this project. Any third party agrees by accepting this report that any use or reliance on this report shall be limited by the exceptions and limitations in this report, and with the acknowledgment that actual site conditions may change with time, and that hidden conditions may exist at the property that were not discovered within the authorized scope of the assessment. Any use by or distribution of this report to third parties, without the express written consent of Cardno is at the sole risk and expense of such third party. Cardno makes no other representation to any third party except that it has used the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by environmental consultants in the preparation of the report and in the assembling of data and information related thereto. No other warranties are made to any third party, either expressed or implied. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 7 4 Site Description 4.1 Location and Legal Description The subject property is in Naples, Collier County, Florida (as depicted in Figures 1 and 2). The short legal descriptions of the subject property parcels (as provided in County records) are as follows:  Parcel 00287920000 (7025 Nighthawk Drive): 18 49 26 E 264FT OF W 528FT OF S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 2 AC OR 543 PG 76  Parcel 00287600003 (no street address): 18 49 26 W 264FT + E 264FT OF FOLL, S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 3.94 AC  Parcel 00287880001 (no street address): 18 49 26 E 264FT OF W 792FT OF S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 2 AC OR 1449 PG 231  Parcel 00287840009 (no street address): 18 49 26 E 264FT OF W 1056FT OF S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 2 AC OR 1244 PG 1779 4.2 Surrounding Area General Characteristics The subject property is located in an area of Naples comprised primarily of residential properties, with golf course development to the west. A surrounding land use map is included as Figure 3. 4.3 Current Use and Ownership of the Property At the time of this report, only one of the study area parcels was partially-developed with residential structures. The parcels are owned by four separate entities (all private land owners). 4.4 Descriptions of Property Improvements Approximate Size of Property Total acreage = approximately 10 acres General Topography of Property Flat Adjoining and/or Ingress/Egress Roads Vehicular access to the site is available only Livingston Road, while the on-site driveway/roadway is named “Nighthawk Drive.” The majority of the site is undeveloped land with no visible vehicular acess. Paved Areas Minimal – small section of paved driveway off of Livingston Unimproved Areas Approximately 80 percent of the subject site is undeveloped land Landscaped Areas The one residential parcel (approximately two acres) contains typical residential landscaping. Surface Water None observed – but not areas of the site were accessible at the time of the site visit. Potable Water Source n/a Sanitary Sewer Utility n/a Current Occupancy Status One parcel (two acres) is occupied. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 8 General Building Description n/a – residential Number of Floors n/a – residential Approximate Total Square Footage of Structure(s) According to County records, the following structures are located within Parcel 00287920000:  Residential structure: 2,123 sf  Carport: 104 sf  Garage: 1,344 sf  Swimming pool: 336 sf  Deck: 780 sf  Concrete pad: 180 sf  Aluminum screen enclosure: 2,268 sf Construction Completion Year The residential structure was built in 1982 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 9 5 Owner/User-Provided Information 5.1 Title Records This service was not requested by the Client as part of this assessment, nor did the User (Client) provide title record information. 5.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) No information regarding environmental liens or AULs was provided during this investigation. 5.3 Specialized Knowledge No information was provided during this investigation that would be considered specialized knowledge. 5.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues This information was not provided as part of this investigation. 5.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information It’s reasonable to ascertain that there was no prior land uses that differ from the current uses. 5.6 Reason for Performing Phase I This assessment was performed to satisfy the requirements of the Client and other interested parties with respect to potential environmental impairment associated with the property due to contamination by hazardous substances, controlled substances or petroleum products on or near the site. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 10 6 Records Review The purpose of the records review is to obtain and review records that will help identify RECs in connection with the property. Some records reviewed pertain not only to the property, but also to properties within an additional approximate minimum search distance in order to help assess the likelihood of problems from migrating hazardous substances or petroleum products. Unless stated otherwise the approximate minimum search distances used below were as specified in ASTM Standard 1527-13. 6.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources The regulatory agency database report discussed in this section, provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. was reviewed for information regarding reported use or release of hazardous substances and petroleum products on or near the property. Unless otherwise noted, the information provided by the regulatory agency database report and other sources referenced in this report, were considered sufficient for recognized environmental condition (REC), controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC), historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) or de minimis condition determinations without conducting supplemental agency file reviews. Cardno also reviewed the "unmappable" (also referred to as "orphan") listings within the database report, cross-referencing available address information and facility names. Unmappable sites are listings that could not be plotted with confidence, but are potentially in the general area of the property, based on the partial street address, city, or zip code. Any unmappable site that was identified by Cardno as being within the approximate minimum search distance from the property, based on the site reconnaissance and/or cross-referencing to mapped listings is included in the discussion within this section. The complete regulatory agency database report may be found in Appendix A. The following is a summary of the findings of the database review. Regulatory Database Minimum Search Distance Subject Property Listed? No. of Sites Listed Federal National Priority List (NPL) 1 mile No 0 Federal Delisted NPL 1 mile No 0 Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) list ½ mile No 0 Federal CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP) ½ mile No 0 Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Corrective Action facilities (CORRACTS) 1 mile No 0 Federal RCRIS non- CORRACTS Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSD) ½ mile No 0 Federal RCRA Generators ¼ mile No 0 Federal Institutional Control/Engineering Control Registry ½ mile No 0 Federal Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) list Property No 0 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 11 Regulatory Database Minimum Search Distance Subject Property Listed? No. of Sites Listed Federal Facility Index System/Facility Registry System (FINDS) Property No 0 State and Tribal NPL N/A No 0 State CERCLIS (SHWS) 1 mile No 0 State Landfill or Solid Waste Disposal Sites ½ mile No 0 State and Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites ½ mile No 1 State and Tribal Registered Underground Storage Tank (UST) Sites ¼ mile No 0 State and Tribal Registered Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) Sites ¼ mile No 1 State Institutional Control/Engineering Control Registry Sites ½ mile No 0 State Voluntary Cleanup Site (VCP) database ½ mile No 0 State Priority Cleaners ½ mile No 0 The report listed sites of potential concern based on the search distances listed above. However, only sites that appeared to have the potential for environmental impacts to the subject site (due to proximity, anticipated direction of groundwater flow, regulatory status and/or potential for migrating contamination) are discussed below. The first listing in the report with a street address of 13020 Livingston Road was mis-mapped in very close proximity to the subject site. The actual location is approximately 1,500 north of the subject site.  13020 Livingston Road Location: 13020 Livingston Road (approximately 1,500 feet north of the subject site) Note: This site is mis-mapped in EDR’s report. Concern: EDR Historical Cleaners Proprietary Database Summary: While EDR’s database is not considered agency data (as it is based off of historical city directories), Cardno personnel attempted to locate any documentation associated with this historical facility (only listed in 2011 and 2012), with no agency registrations or incidents recorded. Based on distance from the subject site and anticipated direction of groundwater flow, this listing is not considered an REC in relation to the subject site. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 12  Kensington Golf & Country Club Inc. Location: 2780 Eatonwood Lane (approximately 500 feet southwest of the subject site) Concern: Above-ground Storage Tank (AST) Site Summary: According to available FDEP inspection files, this site maintains one AST system with spill containment. As of its last inspection date (June 2015), the site is in full compliance with no open violations. Historical inspection documents revealed the facility had minor out-of-compliance violations in 2014 that were remedied. None of the 2014 violations would indicate a release to the environment. Based on the above and anticipated direction of groundwater flow, this facility is not being identified as an REC in relation to the subject site. As noted above, the other listed sites are not considered potential concerns based on distance, type of listing, current regulatory status and/or anticipated direction of groundwater flow. 6.2 Physical Setting Sources Hydrogeological resources were examined to identify the probable direction of surface water and shallow groundwater flow at the site. The USGS Belle Meade, Florida 7.5-minute series topographic map produced in 2012 was reviewed. The map shows the site being located at an elevation of 10 feet above mean sea level. Based on map topography contours, the inferred primary direction of groundwater flow for the vicinity of the subject site is determined to be toward the west-northwest. No site-specific data was available that would refute this finding. The USGS Topographic Map is included as Figure 1. According to the US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service inquiry, the site is located in an area comprised primarily of Halopaw fine sand. The Holopaw series consists of deep and very deep, poorly and very poorly drained soils formed in sandy marine sediments. These soils are on low lying flats, in poorly defined drainages or depressional areas. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent. While not typically a part of physical setting records review during performance of a Phase I ESA; Cardno personnel performed a cursory review of the US Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory to determine if documented wetlands were present within the subject site boundaries. The results of that search are depicted on Figure 4. These findings are not indicative of an REC, and are provided only as cursory data. 6.3 Historical Records Sources Historical aerial photographs were obtained from collections maintained by the Florida Department of Transportation. Photos were available from 1973 through 2010, at generally less than 10-year intervals. No historical aerial photographs for years prior to 1973 were reviewed. Select aerial photographs are included as Figures 5a through 5d. No historical city directory information was available for the immediate vicinity of the property. This was not considered a significant data gap based on the availability of aerial photography and the obvious historical on-site and surrounding land uses. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 13 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps have been produced since the late 1800's to provide information relative to fire hazards on insurable property. These maps often indicate locations of underground and aboveground gasoline tanks, storage facilities for flammable chemicals, such as dry cleaners, paint shops, maintenance and garage facilities, as well as historical information on occupants of buildings, unavailable through other sources. Production of these maps typically was limited to the immediate vicinity of downtown urban areas. EDR purchased the Sanborn Company and has access to all available Sanborn maps. EDR performed a search of its archive and indicated that no Sanborn maps were produced for the vicinity of the subject site. This was not considered a significant data gap as historical aerial photos were available for review to determine the general uses of the subject site and reasonably-nearby properties. 6.3.1 Historical Aerial Photographs Period Source(s) Identified Historical Uses Subject Property Surrounding Area 1973 Aerial Photo (see Figure 5a) Undeveloped/vacant land North, south and east: Undeveloped/vacant land West: agricultural (non-citrus) 1985 Aerial Photo (see Figure 5b) Parcel 00287920000 is developed with a residential structure – consistent with the one observed during the recent site visit. Parcel 00287840009 appears to be cleared, with no visible development. No other significant changed noted. No significant changes noted. 1993 Aerial Photo (see Figure 5c) Appears consistent with recent observations. Clearing and development associated with the golf course and residential properties to the west is visible. No other significant changes noted. 2006 Aerial Photo (see Figure 5d) Clearing and development (residential) is visible to the east. On -site and surrounding land use appears consistent with observations made during the recent site visit. In summary, no RECs were identified based on historical aerial review. 6.3.2 Property Tax/Appraiser Files Cardno reviewed available files on Collier County’s Property Appraiser’s website for historical ownership and/or use information on the property. No available records indicate a current or previous ownership of any of the subject site parcels that would indicate an REC. 6.3.3 Recorded Land Title Records The acquisition of recorded land title records was not included in the scope of work of the Phase I ESA. 6.3.4 Prior Reports No prior reports directly associated with the subject site were made available for review. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 14 7 Site Reconnaissance The following is a summary of visual and/or physical observations of the property on the day of the site visit. All but one of the parcels were vacant and unoccupied at the time of the site visit. Heavy vegetation prevented a review of all surfaces, and no indications of previous land use (such as foundations, signs or other features) were noted. Representative site photos can be found in Appendix B. 7.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions Cardno representative, Rick Hagberg, conducted the site reconnaissance. The visit consisted of visual and/or physical observations of the property and improvements; adjoining sites as viewed from the property; and the surrounding area based on visual observations made during the trip to and from the property. Building exteriors on other properties were observed along the perimeter from the ground, unless described otherwise. 7.2 Hazardous Substance Use, Storage, and Disposal Cardno did not observe the use, storage or disposal of hazardous substances on the property, and no hazardous waste was observed. 7.3 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) Cardno observed no obvious indictors of an on-site UST (such as a vent pipe or fill port). 7.4 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) Cardno observed no on-site ASTs at the time of the site visit. 7.5 Other Petroleum Products None observed at the time of the site visit. 7.6 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) A pad-mounted electrical transformer was observed along the west boundary of the subject site in close proximity to the on-site roadway/driveway. While the transformer was not considered to be an environmental liability to the property owner, any leaks from transformers units should be reported to the responsible utility company. 7.7 Unidentified Substance Containers Cardno did not observe the presence of unidentified substance containers on the property. 7.8 Nonhazardous Solid Waste Cardno did not observe any evidence of the generation, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste in, on or at the property. 7.9 Wastewater Cardno did not observe any indications of wastewater generation, treatment or discharge at the property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 15 7.10 Waste Pits, Ponds and Lagoons Cardno did not observe evidence of waste pits, ponds or lagoons in, on or at the property 7.11 Drains and Sumps None observed. 7.12 Septic Systems A septic system was noted at the property associated with the on-site residential dwelling. 7.13 Stormwater Management System None observed or anticipated based on land uses. 7.14 Wells A drinking water well is located within the subject site boundaries. In addition, numerous permitted water wells are reported in the general vicinity of the subject site. This feature is not considered an REC, but should be noted during site development. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 16 8 Interviews/Questionnaires 8.1 Site Owners Each of the three site owners completed Cardno’s All Appropriate Inquiry Interview Questionnaire. In summary, based on the review of each completed questionnaire, no RECs were identified during review of the answers provided. 8.2 End User Cardno’s All Appropriate Inquiry User Questionnaire was completed by a representative of the purchaser (WCI). In summary, the anticipated purchase prices reportedly reflect the fair market value of each parcel, and no RECs were identified during review of the answers provided. A copy of the above questionnaire is included in Appendix C. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 17 9 Subsurface Vapor Migration Hazardous gases (vapor) from subsurface sources, such as contaminated soil or groundwater can migrate into residential, commercial, and industrial buildings with any foundation type, including basements, crawlspaces, or slabs. According to EPA guidance, three conditions must exist for hazardous vapors to reach the interior of buildings from the subsurface environment underneath or near a building. First, a source of hazardous vapors must be present in the soil or in groundwater underneath or near a building. Second, vapors must form and have a pathway along which to migrate toward the building. Third, entry routes must exist for the vapors to enter the building, and driving forces must exist to draw the vapors into the building. Cardno considered the nature and extent of on-site and nearby sources of potential subsurface vapor migration by evaluating the current and historical usage of the property, the construction type and history, the physical setting, and the potential sources of subsurface vapor migration through the review of regulatory agency database information that was summarized in Section 6.0. Based on the lack of data indicating impacts on or near the property, the potential for vapor intrusion within the subject site boundaries is minimal. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 18 10 References Historical Aerials: FDOT, University of Florida Historical Aerials Collection United States Geological Survey; Quadrangles Collier County Property Appraiser, Online Inquiry System Regulatory Database, City Directory, Topographic Map and Sanborn Fire Insurance Map Search, Environmental Data Resources, Inc. EPA on-line database searches Historical City Directories, R.L. Polk Company, Hill-Donnelly Corporation USGS Natural Resources Conservation Services, National Cooperative Soil Survey US Fish & Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory Database Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 19 11 Qualifications/Signatures of Environmental Professional(s) I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in 40 CFR Part 312.10. I certify that this report has been prepared in general accordance with 40 CFR Part 312 and ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments. I further certify that, in my professional judgment, this report meets the requirements of 40 CFR Part 312, Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries, and was prepared by me or under my direct responsible charge. for Cardno S. Shawn Lasseter Project Manager Date: 05/17/2016 I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in 40 CFR Part 312.10. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the subject property. I further certify that, in my professional judgment, this report meets the requirements of 40 CFR Part 312, Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries, and was prepared by me or under my direct responsible charge. for Cardno Richard L. Hagberg, PG Director Date: 05/17/2016 (resume summaries follow) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1015 Livingston Road, Naples, Florida May 2016 Cardno 20 Richard L. Hagberg, PG Director/Geologist BS / Geology/Hydrogeology / 1985 MS / Environmental Science (pending) • Registered Professional Geologist; FL, • Licensed Florida Water Well Contractor • 30 Years Professional Experience • 40-Hour OSHA Certified • Member - Florida Brownfields Association • Member – Tampa Bay Area Association of Environmental Professionals As Manager of Cardno’s Clearwater Branch Environmental Services Group, Mr. Hagberg directs all of the branch’s environmental services projects. He has extensive experience in industrial and hazardous waste assessment and remediation, including management of private and public sector projects. His project experience includes site assessment, environmental construction and remediation, industrial, petroleum, sanitary, and hazardous waste investigation and treatment, operational and transactional audits, training programs, permitting, and multimedia field sampling. Shawn Lasseter Project Manager AA, Science & Technology, Gulf Coast College, 1983 BBA, Business, University of SW Georgia, 1990  Certified Environmental Inspector  Extensive Phase I/II ESA Experience  40-Hour OSHA Certified  Member – Tampa Bay Association of Environmental Professionals  Member – National Environmental Assessment Association  Member – Florida Brownfields Association Ms. Lasseter has extensive experience in assessment and management of environmental projects. Her project experience includes Phase I/II environmental assessments and contamination assessments. Highlights of project experience include:  Project Manager for over 700 Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessments  Project manager/technician responsible for conducting EPA Brownfield site assessments utilizing EPA Brownfield Grant Funding  Project Manager for Florida Department of Environmental Protection Pre -approval Cleanup Program site assessments Figures Figure 1 USGS/Site Vicinity Map Source: US Geological Survey (USGS) Subject Site Location 7025 Nighthawk Drive & Adjacent Parcels Livingston Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida Parcel ID Nos. Parcel ID: 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001, and 00287840009 Figure 2 Site Boundary Map Legend: Red Lines = Approximate Subject Site Parcel Boundaries (For reference purposes only, not a map of survey) 0 150 300 7025 Nighthawk Drive & Adjacent Parcels Livingston Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida Parcel ID Nos. Parcel ID: 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001, and 00287840009 Figure 3 Surrounding Land Use Map 0 50 100 Legend: Dashed Line = Approximate Site Boundary (For reference purposes only, not a map of survey) Residential Homeowners Association (borrow pit)ResidentialResidential Vacant Commercial (owned by golf course) 7025 Nighthawk Drive & Adjacent Parcels Livingston Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida Parcel ID Nos. Parcel ID: 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001, and 00287840009 Golf Course Offices Figure 4 US Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory Map Legend: Dashed Line = Approximate Site Boundary (For reference purposes only, not a map of survey) 7025 Nighthawk Drive & Adjacent Parcels Livingston Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida Parcel ID Nos. Parcel ID: 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001, and 00287840009 Figure 5a Aerial Photograph -1973 Legend: Dashed Line = Approximate Site Boundary (For reference purposes only, not a map of survey) 7025 Nighthawk Drive & Adjacent Parcels Livingston Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida Parcel ID Nos. Parcel ID: 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001, and 00287840009 Subject Site Location Figure 5b Aerial Photograph -1985 Legend: Dashed Line = Approximate Site Boundary (For reference purposes only, not a map of survey) 7025 Nighthawk Drive & Adjacent Parcels Livingston Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida Parcel ID Nos. Parcel ID: 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001, and 00287840009 Figure 5c Aerial Photograph -1993 Legend: Dashed Line = Approximate Site Boundary (For reference purposes only, not a map of survey) 7025 Nighthawk Drive & Adjacent Parcels Livingston Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida Parcel ID Nos. Parcel ID: 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001, and 00287840009 Figure 5d Aerial Photograph -2006 Legend: Dashed Line = Approximate Site Boundary (For reference purposes only, not a map of survey) 7025 Nighthawk Drive & Adjacent Parcels Livingston Road, Naples, Collier County, Florida Parcel ID Nos. Parcel ID: 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001, and 00287840009 Appendix A EDR Agency Database Search Results FORM-NULL-PVC tropeR paM suidaR yrammuS RDE 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Livingston Road Site Livingston Road Naples, FL 34105 Inquiry Number: 4574759.2s March 28, 2016 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 22 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-11 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-13 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC4574759.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4574759.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS LIVINGSTON ROAD NAPLES, FL 34105 COORDINATES 26.2048490 - 26˚ 12’ 17.45’’Latitude (North): 81.7499430 - 81˚ 44’ 59.79’’Longitude (West): Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator: 425075.4UTM X (Meters): 2898422.8UTM Y (Meters): 10 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY TP Target Property: U.S. Geological SurveySource: W Target Property: U.S. Geological SurveySource: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20100428Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 4574759.2s Page 2 4 WYNDEMERE GOLF COURS TO BE DET Fl Sites Higher 4972, 0.942, SSE 3 CIRCLE K #2723919 1000 WHIPPORWILL LN LUST, SPILLS, Financial Assurance Higher 2558, 0.484, NE 2 KENSINGTON GOLF & CN 2780 EATONWOOD LANE AST, Financial Assurance Higher 554, 0.105, WSW 1 13020 LIVINGSTON RD EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 254, 0.048, West MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: LIVINGSTON ROAD NAPLES, FL 34105 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4574759.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/08/2016 has revealed that there is 1 LUST site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CIRCLE K #2723919 1000 WHIPPORWILL LN NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.484 mi.) 3 8 Discharge Cleanup Status: SRCR - SRCR COMPLETE Facility Status: OPEN Facility-Site Id: 9502425 State and tribal registered storage tank lists AST: A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/08/2016 has revealed that there is 1 AST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ KENSINGTON GOLF & CN 2780 EATONWOOD LANE WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) 2 8 Facility-Site Id: 9801507 Facility Status: OPEN Facility Status: OPEN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4574759.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites Fl Sites: A review of the Fl Sites list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/1989 has revealed that there is 1 Fl Sites site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WYNDEMERE GOLF COURS TO BE DET SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.942 mi.) 4 9 Facility-Site Id: 000503 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Cleaner: A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Cleaner site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 13020 LIVINGSTON RD W 0 - 1/8 (0.048 mi.) 1 8 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 1 records.NAPLES S115155632LIVINGSTON ROAD AND GOLDEN GATE PALIVINGSTON ROAD AND GOLDEN GAT RGA LFTC4574759.2s Page 22 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST TC4574759.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FF TANKS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250TANKS State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PRIORITYCLEANERS 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000Fl Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 80 Other Ascertainable Records 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD TC4574759.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCLEANUP SITES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DEDB 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DWM CONTAM 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FL Cattle Dip. Vats 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RESP PARTY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SITE INV SITES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTIER 2 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto 1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner TC4574759.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA HWS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST 4 0 1 1 0 2 0- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC4574759.2s Page 7 TC4574759.2s Page 8 3 LUSTCIRCLE K #2723919 S108785879 NE SPILLS1000 WHIPPORWILL LN N/A 1/4-1/2 Financial AssuranceNAPLES, FL 34105 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.484 mi. 2558 ft. LUST Facility Status: OPEN Facility-Site Id: 9502425 Discharge Cleanup Status: SRCR - SRCR COMPLETE Click here for Florida Oculus SPILLS OHMIT Incident Number: 36922 Incident Status: Closed Financial Assurance Facility Status: OPEN Facility ID: 9502425 2 ASTKENSINGTON GOLF & CNTRY CLUB INC S107932469 WSW Financial Assurance2780 EATONWOOD LANE N/A < 1/8 NAPLES, FL 34105 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.105 mi. 554 ft. AST Facility Status: OPEN Facility-Site Id: 9801507 Facility Status: OPEN Click here for Florida Oculus Financial Assurance Facility Status: OPEN Facility ID: 9801507 1 EDR Hist Cleaner 1014987171 West 13020 LIVINGSTON RD N/A < 1/8 NAPLES, FL 34105 Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.048 mi. 254 ft. MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TC4574759.2s Page 9 4 Fl SitesWYNDEMERE GOLF COURSE S100888848 SSE TO BE DET N/A 1/2-1 NAPLES, FL Relative: Higher Click here for full text details 0.942 mi. 4972 ft. Fl Sites Facility-Site Id: 000503 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.FL AIRS Permitted Facilities Listing Department of Environmental Protection 02/02/2016 02/04/2016 03/07/2016FL AST Storage Tank Facility Information Department of Environmental Protection 01/08/2016 02/03/2016 03/07/2016FL BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Sites Database Department of Environmental Protection 01/03/2016 01/06/2016 03/07/2016FL BROWNFIELDS AREAS Brownfields Areas Database Department of Environmental Protection 01/03/2016 01/06/2016 03/07/2016FL BSRA Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreements Listing Department of Environmental Protection 12/18/2015 01/06/2016 03/07/2016FL CLEANUP SITES DEP Cleanup Sites - Contamination Locator Map Listing Department of Environmental Protection 11/30/2015 12/01/2015 02/04/2016FL DEDB Ethylene Dibromide Database Results Department of Environmental Protection 01/06/2016 01/08/2016 03/07/2016FL DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Facilities Department of Environmental Protection 01/08/2016 01/27/2016 03/07/2016FL DWM CONTAM DWM CONTAMINATED SITES Department of Environmental Protection 09/30/2015 10/20/2015 12/01/2015FL ENG CONTROLS Institutional Controls Registry Department of Environmental Protection 12/01/2015 01/06/2016 03/07/2016FL FF TANKS Federal Facilities Listing Department of Environmental Protection 01/12/2016 01/14/2016 03/07/2016FL FL Cattle Dip. Vats Cattle Dipping Vats Department of Environmental Protection 02/04/2005 06/29/2007 07/11/2007FL FL SITES Sites List Department of Environmental Protection 12/31/1989 05/09/1994 08/04/1994FL Financial Assurance 1 Financial Assurance Information Listing Department of Environmental Protection 02/02/2016 02/04/2016 03/07/2016FL Financial Assurance 2 Financial Assurance Information Listing Department of Environmental Protection 01/27/2016 02/02/2016 03/07/2016FL Financial Assurance 3 Financial Assurance Information Listing Department of Environmental Protection 01/08/2016 02/03/2016 03/07/2016FL Inst Control Institutional Controls Registry Department of Environmental Protection 12/01/2015 01/06/2016 03/07/2016FL LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tank Listing Department of Environmental Protection 02/01/2016 02/02/2016 03/07/2016FL LUST Petroleum Contamination Detail Report Department of Environmental Protection 01/08/2016 02/03/2016 03/07/2016FL PRIORITYCLEANERS Priority Ranking List Department of Environmental Protection 10/02/2015 11/18/2015 01/12/2016FL RESP PARTY Responsible Party Sites Listing Department of Environmental Protection 01/03/2016 01/07/2016 03/07/2016FL RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilitie Department of Environmental Protection 07/01/2013 12/30/2013FL RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List Department of Environmental Protection 07/01/2013 01/10/2014FL RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tan Department of Environmental Protection 07/01/2013 12/30/2013FL SHWS Florida’s State-Funded Action Sites Department of Environmental Protection 09/01/2015 11/24/2015 01/12/2016FL SITE INV SITES Site Investigation Section Sites Listing Department of Environmental Protection 11/23/2015 11/24/2015 01/12/2016FL SPILLS Oil and Hazardous Materials Incidents Department of Environmental Protection 12/31/2015 01/12/2016 03/07/2016FL SPILLS 80 SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch FirstSearch 09/01/2001 01/03/2013 03/06/2013FL SPILLS 90 SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch FirstSearch 12/10/2012 01/03/2013 03/04/2013FL SWF/LF Solid Waste Facility Database Department of Environmental Protection 01/19/2016 01/20/2016 03/07/2016FL SWRCY Recycling Centers Department of Environmental Protection 07/24/2014 10/22/2014 01/12/2015FL TANKS Storage Tank Facility List Department of Environmental Protection 11/05/2015 11/08/2015 11/20/2015FL TIER 2 Tier 2 Facility Listing Department of Environmental Protection 12/31/2014 10/15/2015 11/20/2015FL UIC Underground Injection Wells Database Listing Department of Environmental Protection 01/25/2016 01/27/2016 03/07/2016FL UST Storage Tank Facility Information Department of Environmental Protection 01/08/2016 02/03/2016 03/07/2016FL VCP Voluntary Cleanup Sites Department of Environmental Protection 11/17/2015 11/23/2015 01/12/2016FL WASTEWATER Wastewater Facility Regulation Database Department of Environmental Protection 02/02/2016 02/10/2016 03/07/2016US 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List Environmental Protection Agency 04/22/2013 03/03/2015 03/09/2015US BRS Biennial Reporting System EPA/NTIS 12/31/2013 02/24/2015 09/30/2015US COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data Department of Energy 12/31/2005 08/07/2009 10/22/2009US COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List Environmental Protection Agency 07/01/2014 09/10/2014 10/20/2014US CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library 12/31/2014 04/17/2015 06/02/2015US CORRACTS Corrective Action Report EPA 06/09/2015 06/26/2015 09/16/2015US DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations EPA, Region 9 01/12/2009 05/07/2009 09/21/2009US DOD Department of Defense Sites USGS 12/31/2005 11/10/2006 01/11/2007US DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeli 07/31/2012 08/07/2012 09/18/2012US Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions EPA 10/30/2015 11/07/2015 01/04/2016TC4574759.2s Page GR-1GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date US ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information Environmental Protection Agency 09/20/2015 09/23/2015 01/04/2016US EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR, Inc.US EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR, Inc.US EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST Environmental Protection Agency 08/30/2013 03/21/2014 06/17/2014US ERNS Emergency Response Notification System National Response Center, United States Coast 06/22/2015 06/26/2015 09/16/2015US FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Environmental Protection Agency 03/26/2015 04/08/2015 06/11/2015US FEDLAND Federal and Indian Lands U.S. Geological Survey 12/31/2005 02/06/2006 01/11/2007US FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing FEMA 01/01/2010 02/16/2010 04/12/2010US FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System EPA 07/20/2015 09/09/2015 11/03/2015US FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxi 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US FTTS INSP FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 01/31/2015 07/08/2015 10/13/2015US FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing EPA 11/23/2015 11/24/2015 02/18/2016US FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Department of Energy 11/23/2015 11/24/2015 02/18/2016US HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US HIST FTTS INSP FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Lis Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/200704/10/2007US HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System U.S. Department of Transportation 06/24/2015 06/26/2015 09/02/2015US ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System Environmental Protection Agency 01/23/2015 02/06/2015 03/09/2015US INDIAN LUST R1 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 1 10/27/2015 10/29/2015 01/04/2016US INDIAN LUST R10 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 01/07/2016 01/08/2016 02/18/2016US INDIAN LUST R4 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 11/24/2015 12/01/2015 01/04/2016US INDIAN LUST R5 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 5 11/04/2015 11/13/2015 01/04/2016US INDIAN LUST R6 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 08/20/2015 10/30/2015 02/18/2016US INDIAN LUST R7 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 03/30/2015 04/28/2015 06/22/2015US INDIAN LUST R8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 10/13/2015 10/23/2015 02/18/2016US INDIAN LUST R9 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Environmental Protection Agency 01/08/2015 01/08/2015 02/09/2015US INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Environmental Protection Agency 12/31/1998 12/03/2007 01/24/2008US INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations USGS 12/31/2005 12/08/2006 01/11/2007US INDIAN UST R1 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 1 10/20/2015 10/29/2015 01/04/2016US INDIAN UST R10 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 10 01/07/2016 01/08/2016 02/18/2016US INDIAN UST R4 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 4 11/24/2015 12/01/2015 01/04/2016US INDIAN UST R5 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 5 11/05/2015 11/13/2015 01/04/2016US INDIAN UST R6 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 6 08/20/2015 10/30/2015 02/18/2016US INDIAN UST R7 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 7 09/23/2014 11/25/2014 01/29/2015US INDIAN UST R8 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 8 10/13/2015 10/23/2015 02/18/2016US INDIAN UST R9 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 9 12/14/2014 02/13/2015 03/13/2015US INDIAN VCP R1 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing EPA, Region 1 07/27/2015 09/29/2015 02/18/2016US INDIAN VCP R7 Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng EPA, Region 7 03/20/2008 04/22/2008 05/19/2008US LEAD SMELTER 1 Lead Smelter Sites Environmental Protection Agency 11/25/2014 11/26/2014 01/29/2015US LEAD SMELTER 2 Lead Smelter Sites American Journal of Public Health 04/05/2001 10/27/2010 12/02/2010US LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Environmental Protection Agency 02/18/2014 03/18/2014 04/24/2014US LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Department of the Navy 05/28/2015 05/29/2015 06/11/2015US MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System Nuclear Regulatory Commission 06/26/2015 07/10/2015 10/13/2015US NPL National Priority List EPA 10/30/2015 11/07/2015 01/04/2016US NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens EPA 10/15/1991 02/02/1994 03/30/1994US ODI Open Dump Inventory Environmental Protection Agency 06/30/1985 08/09/2004 09/17/2004TC4574759.2s Page GR-2GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date US PADS PCB Activity Database System EPA 07/01/2014 10/15/2014 11/17/2014US PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database Environmental Protection Agency 02/01/2011 10/19/2011 01/10/2012US PRP Potentially Responsible Parties EPA 10/25/2013 10/17/2014 10/20/2014US Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites EPA 10/30/2015 11/07/2015 01/04/2016US RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System EPA 04/17/1995 07/03/1995 08/07/1995US RADINFO Radiation Information Database Environmental Protection Agency 07/07/2015 07/09/2015 09/16/2015US RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated Environmental Protection Agency 06/09/2015 06/26/2015 09/16/2015US RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 06/09/2015 06/26/2015 09/16/2015US RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 06/09/2015 06/26/2015 09/16/2015US RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 06/09/2015 06/26/2015 09/16/2015US RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Environmental Protection Agency 06/09/2015 06/26/2015 09/16/2015US RMP Risk Management Plans Environmental Protection Agency 08/01/2015 08/26/2015 11/03/2015US ROD Records Of Decision EPA 11/25/2013 12/12/2013 02/24/2014US SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Environmental Protection Agency 03/07/2011 03/09/2011 05/02/2011US SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System EPA 01/11/2016 01/22/2016 03/18/2016US SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive EPA 01/11/2016 01/22/2016 03/18/2016US SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems EPA 12/31/2009 12/10/2010 02/25/2011US TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System EPA 12/31/2013 02/12/2015 06/02/2015US TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act EPA 12/31/2012 01/15/2015 01/29/2015US UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Department of Energy 09/14/2010 10/07/2011 03/01/2012US US AIRS (AFS) Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem ( EPA 10/20/2015 10/27/2015 01/04/2016US US AIRS MINOR Air Facility System Data EPA 10/20/2015 10/27/2015 01/04/2016US US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Environmental Protection Agency 12/22/2015 12/23/2015 02/18/2016US US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Drug Enforcement Administration 09/17/2015 12/04/2015 02/18/2016US US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List Environmental Protection Agency 09/10/2015 09/11/2015 11/03/2015US US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information Environmental Protection Agency 09/01/2015 09/03/2015 11/03/2015US US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Drug Enforcement Administration 09/17/2015 12/04/2015 02/18/2016US US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Environmental Protection Agency 09/10/2015 09/11/2015 11/03/2015US US MINES Mines Master Index File Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health A 08/18/2015 09/01/2015 01/04/2016US US MINES 2 Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing USGS 12/05/2005 02/29/2008 04/18/2008US US MINES 3 Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing USGS 04/14/2011 06/08/2011 09/13/2011CT CT MANIFEST Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Department of Energy & Environmental Protecti 07/30/2013 08/19/2013 10/03/2013NJ NJ MANIFEST Manifest Information Department of Environmental Protection 12/31/2013 07/17/2015 08/12/2015NY NY MANIFEST Facility and Manifest Data Department of Environmental Conservation 02/01/2016 02/03/2016 03/22/2016PA PA MANIFEST Manifest Information Department of Environmental Protection 12/31/2014 07/24/2015 08/18/2015RI RI MANIFEST Manifest information Department of Environmental Management 12/31/2013 06/19/2015 07/15/2015WI WI MANIFEST Manifest Information Department of Natural Resources 12/31/2014 03/19/2015 04/07/2015TC4574759.2s Page GR-3GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date Oil/Gas PipelinesSource: PennWell CorporationPetroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and SpecialtyGases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This informationis provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrantits fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.Electric Power Transmission Line DataSource: PennWell CorporationThis map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a besteffort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for anyparticular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.US AHA Hospitals Sensitive Receptor: AHA Hospitals American Hospital Association, Inc.US Medical Centers Sensitive Receptor: Medical Centers Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesUS Nursing Homes Sensitive Receptor: Nursing Homes National Institutes of HealthUS Public Schools Sensitive Receptor: Public Schools National Center for Education StatisticsUS Private Schools Sensitive Receptor: Private Schools National Center for Education StatisticsFL Daycare Centers Sensitive Receptor: Department of Children & Families Provider InformationUS Flood Zones 100-year and 500-year flood zones Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)US NWI National Wetlands Inventory U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceFL State Wetlands Wetlands Inventory Department of Environmental ProtectionUS Topographic MapU.S. Geological SurveySTREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protectionand other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subjectto the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.TC4574759.2s Page GR-4GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full Name Government Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date TC4574759.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5652638 NAPLES NORTH, FLWest Map: 2012Version Date: 5652578 BELLE MEADE NW, FLTarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 10 ft. above sea levelElevation: 2898422.8UTM Y (Meters): 425075.4UTM X (Meters): Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator: 81.749943 - 81˚ 44’ 59.79’’Longitude (West): 26.204849 - 26˚ 12’ 17.46’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES NAPLES, FL 34105 LIVINGSTON ROAD LIVINGSTON ROAD SITE TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC4574759.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 10 ft. North South West East10101010111111101010101010101010101010991010101010101010101111111211121212General WNWGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4574759.2s Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapNAPLES NORTH NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property 1200670425D - FEMA Q3 Flood dataAdditional Panels in search area: 1200670385D - FEMA Q3 Flood dataFlood Plain Panel at Target Property: YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapCOLLIER, FL FEMA FLOOD ZONE FEMA Flood Electronic DataTarget Property County and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4574759.2s Page A-4 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: PleistoceneSeries: QpCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 2 4 3 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC4574759.2s Page A-6 Max: Min: Min: 14.11 Max: 141.14 Not reportedNot reportedbedrock61 inches61 inches 3 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 1.41 Max: 14.11 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sandy loam61 inches57 inches 2 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand57 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 15 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 165 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class: drained and are classified. Class B/D - Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can beHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: HolopawSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4574759.2s Page A-7 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand79 inches72 inches 5 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 0 Max: 1.41 Clayey sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy clay loam72 inches55 inches 4 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand55 inches29 inches 3 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand29 inches14 inches 2 Min: 5.1 Max: 8.4 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand14 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 15 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class: drained and are classified. Class B/D - Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can beHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: MalabarSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4574759.2s Page A-8 Soil Drainage Class: drained and are classified. Class B/D - Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can beHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: WaterSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 4 Max: Min: Min: 14.11 Max: 141.14 Not reportedNot reportedbedrock55 inches55 inches 3 Min: 6.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 0.42 Max: 1.41 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy clay loam55 inches29 inches 2 Min: 5.6 Max: 6.5 Min: 42.34 Max: 141.14 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. 200), Fine passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sand29 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 15 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 152 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class: drained and are classified. Class B/D - Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can beHydrologic Group: fine sandSoil Surface Texture: PinedaSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 3 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4574759.2s Page A-9 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ESEFLSO80000023419 5 1/8 - 1/4 Mile WNWFLSO80000004968 4 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SouthFLSO80000002427 3 1/8 - 1/4 Mile WNWFLSO80000049586 2 0 - 1/8 Mile SEFLSO80000002426 1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile NWUSGS40000235695 45 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS No Layer Information available. > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4574759.2s Page A-10 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWFLSO80000004978 58 1/2 - 1 Mile NNEFLSA80000104184 K57 1/2 - 1 Mile NEFLSO80000048968 56 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000008552 J55 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000008553 J54 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000008550 J53 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000008551 J52 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEFLSO80000049844 I51 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEFLSO80000049843 I50 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSO80000039247 49 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000033541 H48 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000033543 H47 1/2 - 1 Mile WestFLSO80000004967 46 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000043395 44 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000039912 43 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSO80000004965 G42 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000001811 41 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000004971 E40 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSO80000004975 G39 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWFLSO80000004962 38 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000029809 F37 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEFLSO80000029807 F36 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWFLSO80000004977 35 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWFLSO80000004970 E34 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ESEFLSO80000023418 33 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NorthFLSO80000051183 32 1/4 - 1/2 Mile EastFLSO80000015402 D31 1/4 - 1/2 Mile EastFLSO80000015403 D30 1/4 - 1/2 Mile EastFLSO80000039386 D29 1/4 - 1/2 Mile EastFLSO80000003013 D28 1/4 - 1/2 Mile EastFLSO80000003010 D27 1/4 - 1/2 Mile EastFLSO80000003011 D26 1/4 - 1/2 Mile EastFLSO80000003012 D25 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSWFLSO80000049588 24 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWFLSO80000030688 C23 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWFLSO80000030686 C22 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWFLSO80000030685 C21 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWFLSO80000030687 C20 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENEFLSO80000011240 19 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SouthFLSO80000029808 B18 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SouthFLSO80000029806 B17 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWFLSO80000004969 16 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWFLSO80000004973 A15 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWFLSO80000004974 A14 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWFLSO80000004972 A13 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWFLSO80000004963 A12 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWFLSO80000004964 A11 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWFLSO80000004976 A10 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEFLSO80000011239 9 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WestFLSO80000004959 A8 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNWFLSO80000005385 7 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSEFLSO80000031106 6 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4574759.2s Page A-11 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthFLSO80000011097 S91 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthFLSO80000011096 S90 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000015205 P89 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWFLSO80000050488 88 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWFLSO80000050490 87 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000015378 P86 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSO80000015203 R85 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSO80000015376 R84 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWFLSO80000050489 83 1/2 - 1 Mile WestFLSO80000042852 82 1/2 - 1 Mile SEFLSO80000033544 Q81 1/2 - 1 Mile SEFLSO80000033542 Q80 1/2 - 1 Mile SEFLSO80000033545 Q79 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSO80000015204 P78 1/2 - 1 Mile NWFLSO80000015377 P77 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthFLSO80000011099 76 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEFLSO80000035594 75 1/2 - 1 Mile NEFLSA80000030618 N74 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000033575 O73 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000033574 O72 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000033573 O71 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000033572 O70 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000008549 O69 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWFLSO80000008548 O68 1/2 - 1 Mile WestFLSO80000004966 M67 1/2 - 1 Mile NEFLSA80000030617 N66 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWFLSO80000004960 65 1/2 - 1 Mile WestFLSO80000004961 M64 1/2 - 1 Mile NNEFLSA80000088693 K63 1/2 - 1 Mile NNEFLSA80000030620 K62 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000004280 L61 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000004279 L60 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEFLSO80000004281 L59 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. FL EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase 1 SE 0 - 1/8 Mile Higher FLSO80000002426FL WELLSClick here for full text details 2 WNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSO80000049586FL WELLSClick here for full text details 3 South 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSO80000002427FL WELLSClick here for full text details 4 WNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher FLSO80000004968FL WELLSClick here for full text details 5 ESE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000023419FL WELLSClick here for full text details 6 SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000031106FL WELLSClick here for full text details 7 NNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000005385FL WELLSClick here for full text details A8 West 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000004959FL WELLSClick here for full text details Page: 1 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase 9 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000011239FL WELLSClick here for full text details A10 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000004976FL WELLSClick here for full text details A11 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000004964FL WELLSClick here for full text details A12 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000004963FL WELLSClick here for full text details A13 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000004972FL WELLSClick here for full text details A14 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000004974FL WELLSClick here for full text details A15 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000004973FL WELLSClick here for full text details 16 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000004969FL WELLSClick here for full text details B17 South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000029806FL WELLSClick here for full text details Page: 2 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase B18 South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower FLSO80000029808FL WELLSClick here for full text details 19 ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000011240FL WELLSClick here for full text details C20 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000030687FL WELLSClick here for full text details C21 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000030685FL WELLSClick here for full text details C22 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000030686FL WELLSClick here for full text details C23 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000030688FL WELLSClick here for full text details 24 SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000049588FL WELLSClick here for full text details D25 East 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000003012FL WELLSClick here for full text details D26 East 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000003011FL WELLSClick here for full text details Page: 3 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase D27 East 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000003010FL WELLSClick here for full text details D28 East 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000003013FL WELLSClick here for full text details D29 East 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000039386FL WELLSClick here for full text details D30 East 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000015403FL WELLSClick here for full text details D31 East 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000015402FL WELLSClick here for full text details 32 North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000051183FL WELLSClick here for full text details 33 ESE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000023418FL WELLSClick here for full text details E34 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000004970FL WELLSClick here for full text details 35 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher FLSO80000004977FL WELLSClick here for full text details Page: 4 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase F36 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000029807FL WELLSClick here for full text details F37 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000029809FL WELLSClick here for full text details 38 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000004962FL WELLSClick here for full text details G39 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000004975FL WELLSClick here for full text details E40 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000004971FL WELLSClick here for full text details 41 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000001811FL WELLSClick here for full text details G42 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000004965FL WELLSClick here for full text details 43 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000039912FL WELLSClick here for full text details 44 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000043395FL WELLSClick here for full text details Page: 5 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase 45 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher USGS40000235695FED USGSClick here for full text details 46 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000004967FL WELLSClick here for full text details H47 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000033543FL WELLSClick here for full text details H48 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000033541FL WELLSClick here for full text details 49 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000039247FL WELLSClick here for full text details I50 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000049843FL WELLSClick here for full text details I51 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000049844FL WELLSClick here for full text details J52 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000008551FL WELLSClick here for full text details J53 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000008550FL WELLSClick here for full text details Page: 6 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase J54 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000008553FL WELLSClick here for full text details J55 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000008552FL WELLSClick here for full text details 56 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000048968FL WELLSClick here for full text details K57 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSA80000104184FL WELLSClick here for full text details 58 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000004978FL WELLSClick here for full text details L59 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000004281FL WELLSClick here for full text details L60 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000004279FL WELLSClick here for full text details L61 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000004280FL WELLSClick here for full text details K62 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSA80000030620FL WELLSClick here for full text details Page: 7 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase K63 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSA80000088693FL WELLSClick here for full text details M64 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000004961FL WELLSClick here for full text details 65 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000004960FL WELLSClick here for full text details N66 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSA80000030617FL WELLSClick here for full text details M67 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000004966FL WELLSClick here for full text details O68 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000008548FL WELLSClick here for full text details O69 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000008549FL WELLSClick here for full text details O70 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000033572FL WELLSClick here for full text details O71 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000033573FL WELLSClick here for full text details Page: 8 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase O72 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000033574FL WELLSClick here for full text details O73 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000033575FL WELLSClick here for full text details N74 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSA80000030618FL WELLSClick here for full text details 75 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000035594FL WELLSClick here for full text details 76 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000011099FL WELLSClick here for full text details P77 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000015377FL WELLSClick here for full text details P78 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000015204FL WELLSClick here for full text details Q79 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000033545FL WELLSClick here for full text details Q80 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000033542FL WELLSClick here for full text details Page: 9 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase Q81 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000033544FL WELLSClick here for full text details 82 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000042852FL WELLSClick here for full text details 83 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000050489FL WELLSClick here for full text details R84 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000015376FL WELLSClick here for full text details R85 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000015203FL WELLSClick here for full text details P86 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000015378FL WELLSClick here for full text details 87 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000050490FL WELLSClick here for full text details 88 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000050488FL WELLSClick here for full text details P89 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000015205FL WELLSClick here for full text details Page: 10 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase S90 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000011096FL WELLSClick here for full text details S91 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher FLSO80000011097FL WELLSClick here for full text details Page: 11 Not Reported : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for COLLIER County: 3 Certified Residential Database27.74734105 ___________________________________________ Data Source% of sites>4pCi/LTotal BuildingsZip Radon Test Results State Database: FL Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TC4574759.2s Page 12 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8238 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC4574759.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS DEP GWIS - Generalized Water Information System Well Data Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-8507 Data collected for the Watershed Monitoring Section of the Department of Environmental Protection. DOH and DEP Historic Study of Private Wells Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-559-0901 Historic database for private supply wells. Well Construction Permitting Database Source: Northwest Florida Water Management District Telephone: 850-539-5999 Consumptive Use Permit Well Database Source: St. Johns River Water Management District Telephone: 386-329-4841 Permitted Well Location Database Source: South Florida Water Management District Telephone: 561-682-6877 Super Act Program Well Data This table consists of data relating to all privately and publicly owned potable wells investigated as part of the SUPER Act program. The Florida Department of Health’s SUPER Act Program (per Chapter 376.3071(4)(g), Florida Statutes), was given authority to provide field and laboratory services, toxicological risk assessments, investigations of drinking water contamination complaints and education of the public Source: Department of Health Telephone: 850-245-4250 Water Well Location Information Source: Suwannee River Water Management District Telephone: 386-796-7211 TC4574759.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Water Well Permit Database Source: Southwest Water Management District Telephone: 352-796-7211 OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Florida Sinkholes Source: Department of Environmental Protection, Geological Survey The sinkhole data was gathered by the Florida Sinkhole Research Institute, University of Florida. Oil and Gas Permit Database Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 850-245-3194 Locations of all permitted wells in the state of Florida. RADON State Database: FL Radon Source: Department of Health Telephone: 850-245-4288 Zip Code Based Radon Data Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4574759.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Appendix B Site Visit Photos Site Photos 7025 Nighthawk Drive & Adjacent Parcels, Naples, Collier County, Florida Top Photos: Views of the on-site residential structure. Bottom Photos: Views of the residential parcel storage shed and interior storage area. Site Photos 7025 Nighthawk Drive & Adjacent Parcels, Naples, Collier County, Florida Top Photos: Typical views of the undeveloped parcels of the subject site. Bottom Photos: Views of adjacent residential properties to the south and west. Appendix C Site Owners and End User Questionnaires <.J) Carclno . Shaping the Future All Appropriate Inquiry -Interview Questionnaire The new All Appropriate Inquiry rule (40 CFR Part 312) requires that certain inquiries be made to past and present owners, operators and occupants (§312.23) to help evaluate the environmental conditions of the property. This questionnaire has been developed to facilitate the interview process and is intended to be completed prior to the environmental professional's site visit. Please answer all questions to the best of your ability. Current Owner Past Owner Adjacent Property Owner/Occupant 0 1. What is the current use(s) of the property? List all on-site businesses and contact information for each owner or operator. gcc&io± lanel 2. List the known uses/occupants of all adjacent properties. 'f (jGDl n-\-\C:\\\ d 3. Do you know the past uses of the property? DY 0 N List: (i.e. -undeveloped prior to 1940, agricultural 1940 to 1968, shopping center 1968 to present). 4. What have adjacent properties been used for in the past? 5. List the total acr:?e of the property and ~uar~ [o~t~e of ~ach building present on site. !:L ac. No DU-\ \0\, Dg 6. When was each structure built? What was there before construction? NltAt 7. What is the heating source of each building? __ ...... I"-L/ ..... 8-"'--________ _ 8-. Was the fuel source for the building(s)ever heating oil? DY D N DUnk Nif 9. What is the water source for the property? DPublic Supply D Well DUnk "'A 10. What is the sanitary service for the property? DPublic Sanitary Sewer System DUnk MiA 11. Has there ever been a septic system on the property? DY ~ DUnk 12. Are any wells present on-site? DY &'N DUnk 13. Are floor drains present on-site? DY D N DUnk rJA D Septic 14. Where do the drains discharge? M'NlA _______________ _ 15. Are any sumps, sand traps, grease traps or oil-water separators present now or historically on-site? DY IJa"N DUnk 16. Are there transformers, hydraulic lifts or other potentially PCB-containing equipment at the site? DY GtN DUnk 17. If so, has the PCB content been tested? DY D N DUnk N A 18. Have areas of the property been used as borrow pits? DY ~ Explain: 19. Have area of the property been filled with debris or fill of unknown origin? DY !lIN Explain: 20. Is there now or has there been automo\>ile/equipment repair, a parts washer or degreaser present at the ptoperty? DY M N Explain: 21. Are hazardous substances or pytroleum products stored, generated, treated or disposed at the property? OY IYfN ExplainlList: ___________ ~ 22. Are there now or have there been underground storage tanks (USTs) present on the property? DY rnN ExplainlList: ___ ~ __________ _ 23. How many USTs are/were present? (please provide the contents, age, location, size for each) Ii;rN/A _____________________ _ 24. Are the USTs in service, closed~in-place or removed? Please provide applicable closure/removal reports or current tightness testing results) 0 In Service 0 Removed o Closed-in-Place ~N/A _________________ _ 25. Are there now or have there been aboveground storage tanks CASTs) present on the property? DY I1ifN ExplainlList: _______________ _ 26; How many ASTs are/were present? (please provide the contents, age, location, size for each) MN/A _______________ -_____ _ 27. Are the ASTs in service, or removed? Please provide applicable closure/removal reports or current tightness testing results) 0 In Service 0 Removed ~/ A 28. Were chemicals such as solv~l)ts, petroleum products, inks, paints, oils, pesticides or oils used in the past? OY ISirN Explain: ______________ _ I have completed this questionnaire in good faith and to the best of my knowledge. Compmy: _________ --_____ _ ~/?Ie Relationship to the property: ___ --'---'-~"-'ltJteJ<._=_.!..."""'__'=__ ___________ _ Number of years associated with the property:. __ -'-I-""Z'----'A'I~f<,-=-5 ___ _ Cardno Shaping the Future All Appropriate Inquiry ... Interview Questionnaire The new All Appropriate Inquiry rule (40 CFR Part 312) requires that certain inquiries be made to past and present owners, operators and occupants (§312.23) to help evaluate the environmental conditions of the property. This questionnaire has been developed to facilitate the interview process and is intended to be completed prior to the environmental professional's site visit. Please answer all questions to the best of your ability. Site/projectName~~l~~ f'~4 -S...:j;;.. i ~ Address: 10 J 5 L ; v; n j Sfbi"\ R~o...J tJ~flE!; 'E:' .' ____ Person completing interview: .......... C'("\ ~~ . 57 ~eO Current Owner ® Past Owner D Current Occupant D Past Occupant D Adjacent Property Owner/Occupant D 1. What is the current use(s) of the property? List all on-site businesses and contact information for each owner or/operator. .. ~ :::e.~ ~t~;"::±Za:~15~' ~~J;:t <t~~\t~I>I". Nc; () c Co·'"' F ",i)~ f> n ro.y Lf a.c.ve 5 2. List the known uses/occupants of all adjacent properties. ~;I~ Mr~<j-M(S. PoD!"" J"Lvr'l .(). ho .... Se 3. Do you know the past uses of the property? DY .3 N List: (i.e. -undeveloped prior to 1940, agricultural 1940 to 1968, shopping center 1968 to present). rYe> 4. What have adjacent properties been used for in the -past? lS'gI!..'OJWOD 01 N'Pd:h fos·,j-o...l\V S'ot.Jh (?h±he lO(}.cr-eS be-en Salded o(ll~ One \.-\-ot)...-Se f'I\(.dr M~.s Poore... 5. List the total acreage of the property and square footage of each building present on site. Ont ..... · M..v.y (Y\r~ ~o.-yye.5 We<;i+ 1 .' 6. When was each structure built? What was there be:re construction? V01--t-t?1) SlNye ~y'ou.d, d '~?1 gr \9&6 7. What is the heating source of each building? _--,-P~o~nLLd4-~kLlY14--"'-O-",Y..J~ _____ _ 8. Was the fuel source for the building(s) ever heating oil? DY "~N OOJnk 9. What is the water source for the property? DPublic Supply DWell lJUnk 10. What is the sanitary service for the property? DPublic Sanitary Sewer D Septic System ~Unk 11. Has there ever been a septic system on the property? DY )Jf N DUnk 12. Are any wells present on-site? DY }ij~ DUnk 13. Are floor drains present on-site? DY ~N DUnk 14. Where do the drains discharge? ~'N/ A _______________ _ 15. Are any sumps, sand traps, grease traps or oil-water separators present now or historically on-site? DY I)!:N -ijJ.Unk 16. Are there transformers, hydraulic lifts or other potentially PCB-containing equipment at the site? DY ~N ,llUnk 17. lfso, has the PCB content been tested? DY [E'N DUnk 18. Have areas of the property been used as borrow pits? DY ~N Explain: 19. Have area of the property been filled with debris or fill of unknown origin? DY ~N Explain: r J J 'L I 4 h-J. rever IIVe:q. QnIS¥(Dferl~ 20. Is there now or has there been autompb,ile/equipment repair, a parts washer or J degreaser present at the property? DY [J(.N Explain: 21. Are hazardous substances or petroleum products stored, generated, treated or disposed at the property? OY ~N Explain/List: Dp l)lt \<;n <12"",, 22. Are there now or have there been underground storage tanks (USTs) present on the property? DY ~'N Explain/List: j)p ,,It Kn<ow 23. How many USTs are/were present? (Please provide the contents, age, location, size for each) 0 N/A Q a )'1.<1: K9nd 24. Are the USTs in service, closed-in-place or removed? Please provide applicable closure/removal reports or current tightness testing results) 0 In Service 0 Removed o Closed-in-Place 0 N/ A _--J12~o~('\.,-,,'~t-_-l='k"'" l 1 - l ' ~ o , - , & . c " " / f C - _________ _ 25. Are there now or have there been aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) present on the property? DY ~ N ExplainlList: _12-+-,()",,--,--,'D-,-,t~+~"'- ' ' ' A ~ P , , - , M 2 o C 1 o C - _______ _ 26. How many ASTs are/were present? (Please provide the contents, age, location, size for each) 0 N/ A ----------,-..----c-r--------------- :Pont K/>o w 27. Are the ASTs in service, or removed? Please provide applicable closure/removal reports or current tightness testing results) 0 In Service 0 Removed 0 N/ A 28. Were chemicals such as solvents, petroleum products, inks, paints, oils, pesticides or oils used in the past? DY~rN Explain: .....:;ilH-...L\-lJ--I't.I>"/-,.,--,--------- " " yo ,~{ 1\ f7 trIP 29. Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property or adjacent properties? DY 1t'N List: ____________ _ ," Ill, 30. Were hazardous substances or ,petroleum products stored, generated, treated or disposed at the property? DYlj(N Explain/List: ___________ _ 31. Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property or adjacent properties? DY ,t$N Explain: ______________ _ 32. Do you know of any envir'?l}P1ental cleanups that have taken place at the property or adjacent properties? DY ]I.N Explain: ---------------- 33. Has the property been the recipient of any notices or other correspondence from any government agency relating to past or present violations of environmental laws, rules or codes? DY '~'N Explain: __________________ _ 34. Do you know of any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property or adjacent properties? DY ,PiN Explain: __ _ 35. Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens or pending enforcement actions against the property that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state or local law? DY ._~N Explain: ____________________ _ 36. Are you aware of any Activity and Use Limitations CAULs), such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the site and/or have been filed or recorded in a registry under federal, tribal, state or local law? DY JifN Explain: ____________________ _ 37. Do you have any other information that might indicate potential environmental concerns associated with the subject or adjacent properties? DY J&N Explain: __ I have completed this questionnaire in good faith and to the best of my knowledge. Signatur0}\ ~ ~ S~ Date: 4 -~ ? -CZ oJrb ,. Name: D11t. e.,", p. L eODOK, SAtJo~ Title: ------------------------ Company: ____________________ __ Re lations hip to the property :----'("""?~\..V=___.!n'--'--'e..=_.!..t3........:::....._--------------- Number of years associated with the property: t= Y" ~ t cr l <} coY' 1'13 0 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d.Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ 4/15/2015 Page 8 of 16 WCI Communities, LLC 24301 Walden Center Drive Bonita Springs FL 34135 239.947.2600 barryernst@wcicommunities.com 18 49 26 Please see Exhibit 2 attached 00287600003, 00287920000, 00287880001 and 00287840009 X X 66 dwelling units 96,500 GPD 23,100 GPD 68,970 GPD 16,500 GPD 2019 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 4/15/2015 Page 9 of 16 Not Applicable Attached Hamilton Place PUD Exhibit 2 Legal Description June 24, 2016 Page 1 of 1 (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504066) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 528.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504081) THE WEST 264 FEET AND THE EAST 264 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PER COMMITMENT NUMBER: 1062-3504087) THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 792.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AND THE EAST 264.00 FEET OF THE WEST 1056.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com September 9, 2016 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) PL20160001255, Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Dear Sir or Madam: A formal application has been submitted to Collier County, seeking approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezone, by WCI Communities, LLC, represented by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., for the following described property: The subject property is comprised of approximately 9.75 ± acres, located south of Pine Ridge Road on the east side of Livingston Road in Section 18, Township 49 S, Range 26 E, Collier County, Florida. WCI Communities, LLC is asking the County to approve this application, which proposes to rezone approximately 9.75+/- acres from the A, Agriculture Zoning District to the Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District to allow a maximum of 66 residential dwelling units. You are invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting hosted by WCI Communities, LLC to inform nearby property owners, neighbors and the public of the proposed PUD rezone for the subject property. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing, and will be held on Tuesday, September 27, 2016, 5:30 pm at the Naples Church of Christ, Main Auditorium, 12760 Livingston Rd, Naples, FL 34105. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by e-mail, phone, fax or mail to: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134. Sincerely, Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician PL20160001255 500' 7/7/2016 Page 1 of 5 RECKEY NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 LEGAL LOTUNIT SECT TWP RANGE 68300007761 12910 POSITANO CIR RLTY TRUST 5 GOLDENROD LANE LYNNFIELD, MA 01940---1620 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-205 205 18 49 26 68300012044 12965 POSITANO CIRLCE #307 LLC 663 HICKORY RD NAPLES, FL 34108---2638 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-307 307 18 49 26 68300006021 13010 POSITANO CIRCLE #306 LAND TRUST 145 CUNNINGHAM DRIVE BARRIE, ON CANADA L4N 5R3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-306 306 18 49 26 68300011485 1489580 ONTARIO INC % BRENT BAILEY BOX 704 ALLISTN, ON CANADA L9R 1U9 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-306 306 18 49 26 22150003003 1505 SERRANO CIRCLE LLC 4851 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 300 NAPLES, FL 34103---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 138 138 18 49 26 22150000983 1510 SERRANO CIRCLE LLC 4026 CHELSEA GREEN EAST NEW ALBANY, OH 43054---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 37 37 18 49 26 68300016066 2B PARTNERS LLC 1888 6TH STREET SOUTH NAPLES, FL 34102---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 543 543 18 49 26 68300007541 9119841 CANADA INC 345 BARTON ST STONEY CREEK, ON CANADA L8E 2L2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 494 494 18 49 26 68300007842 ACHILIA SERVICES INC 12936 VIOLINO LN APT 301 NAPLES, FL 34105---4928 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-301 301 18 49 26 68300005349 ALAN B HARRIS REV TRUST 30 3RD AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-207 207 18 49 26 22150000860 ALLISON, KAREN 1486 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 31 31 18 49 26 68300011964 AMEN, CHRISTOPHER M CHRISTINE E AMEN 1262 QUIET CIR CONCORD, CA 94521---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-303 303 18 49 26 22150000226 ANDALUCIA HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC C/O CAMBRIDGE PROP MANAGEMENT 2335 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 402 NAPLES, FL 34103---4458 ANDALUCIA TRACT R 1 18 49 26 68300006209 ANDREWS, DONALD E & CAROLYN M 3156 SUNDANCE CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---8921 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-2 A-2 18 49 26 68300008281 ANN MARIE HAMILTON REV TRUST 12935 VIOLINO LN #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---4924 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-204 204 18 49 26 22150000624 ARABIDZE, IRAKLI EDYTA M GRABOWSKA 1438 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 19 19 18 49 26 68300004641 ARAMBALIS, ANGELO & BESSIE 71 HALIBURTON AVENUE TORONTO, ON CANADA M9B 4Y6 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-107 107 18 49 26 68300012206 ATKINS, HOWARD H MICHAEL DEAN MAUPIN P O BOX 36805 PHLADELPHIA, PA 19107---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-2 D-2 18 49 26 22150000666 AZZOPARDI, DAVID B & ROBIN L 1446 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4951 ANDALUCIA LOT 21 21 18 49 26 68300004023 BACHE, DENNIS M & DANA M 170 W PLAIN ST WAYLAND, MA 01778---4320 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-101 101 18 49 26 68300009345 BAILEY, BRENT BOX 704 ALLISTON, ON CANADA L9R 1V9 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-9 B-9 18 49 26 68300010460 BAKER TR, MARK & SOUMAYA 28 JAMES ST NIAGARA-LK, ON CANADA L0S 1J0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 521 521 18 49 26 68300004308 BALGOJEVIC, MARINKO MARIJA GLAUG BLAGOJEVIC MARKO BLAGOJEVIC 526 MELROSE AVE TORONTO, ON CANADA M5M 2A2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-301 301 18 49 26 68300007020 BALTMISKIS, FRANCIS J 8210 RAINTREE LN CHARLOTTE, NC 28277---9861 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-101 101 18 49 26 68300016561 BANGALA, DANIEL & CLAUDIA 2 GETZ PARK THORNHILL, ON CANADA L4J 9B3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 97 97 18 49 26 68300008841 BARBIERO, AMEDEO & GIUSEPPNA 32 BIRCH AVE CALEDON, ON CANADA L7E 0K2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-205 205 18 49 26 68300010240 BARDIS, SPEROS J & EFTERPI D 12960 POSITANO CIR APT 206 NAPLES, FL 34105---4898 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-206 206 18 49 26 68300011922 BASSILA, JAY 68 SUMMIT CIRCLE WESTMOUNT, QC CANADA H3Y 1B5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-301 301 18 49 26 68300004243 BAUM, BRADLEY BRIAN 12920 POSITANO CIR APT 206 NAPLES, FL 34105---4805 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-206 206 18 49 26 68300015368 BEAUCHAMP TR, GUY DIANE BEAUCHAMP TR 300 AV DES SOMMETS APT #1015 ILE DES SOEURS VERDUN, QC CANADA H3E2B7 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-304 304 18 49 26 22150002949 BECK JR, JOHN W BRYAN T PHILLIPS 1493 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 135 135 18 49 26 68300005268 BELKNAP ET AL, BRENT H 13000 POSITANO CIRCLE #203 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-203 203 18 49 26 68300005569 BENDER. JESSICA MICHELLE 13000 POSITANO CIRCLE #108 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 324 324 18 49 26 22150000909 BENNETT, JAMES RANDALL STACEY M PERSCH 1494 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4951 ANDALUCIA LOT 33 33 18 49 26 68300007101 BERMAN, SETH 12980 POSITANO CIRCLE #107 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-107 107 18 49 26 22150000721 BERTINETTI, CYNTHIA RICHARD J BERTINETTI PO BOX 293 CARLINVILLE, IL 62626---0293 ANDALUCIA LOT 24 24 18 49 26 68300005763 BLAGOJEVIC, MARINKO MARIJA GLAUG BLAGOJEVIC MARKO BLAGOJEVIC 526 MELROSE AVENUE TORONTO, ON CANADA M5M 2A2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-201 201 18 49 26 68300008045 BOLTON, DAVID A & KATHLEEN A 1691 SUTTON RD SHAVERTOWN, PA 18708---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 466 466 18 49 26 68300011346 BORS, CRISTIAN 52 KNOLL VIEW CRES TORONTO, ON CANADA M2K 2E2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-207 207 18 49 26 22150000682 BOUDEWIJN, AGATHA B 1450 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4951 ANDALUCIA LOT 22 22 18 49 26 68300010981 BRADER, JUDITH J & BARRY R 820 BENTWOOD DR NAPLES, FL 34108---8203 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-308 308 18 49 26 24984001444 BRAY, CHRISTOPHER P ANN MARIE M MAROSHEK 12840 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 58 58 18 49 26 68300011948 BRENNAN TR, JOHN R & KAREN E BRENNAN REVOCABLE TRUST UTD 06/13/08 4980 TAMARIND RIDGE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---2828 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-302 302 18 49 26 24984001004 BROWN, GLENN R & JANE E 12862 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 36 36 18 49 26 24984000283 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC % SANDCASTLE COMM MGMT 9150 GALLERIA CT #201 NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE TRACT R LESS W 30FT 1 18 49 26 68300016147 BURKETT, LONA JEAN PO BOX 544 MCKEESPORT, PA 15134---0544 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-104 104 18 49 26 68300007729 BUTLER, JAMES E & RUBY 9930 ROOKERY CIR ESTERO, FL 33928---3044 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-203 203 18 49 26 68300010949 CADIEUX, ANDRE LIN LI 4020 LOUVIERS BROSSARD, QC CANADA J4Y 0J2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-306 306 18 49 26 68300012002 CAMPBELL, CHARLES R & ANN R 12975 POSITANO CIR APT 305 NAPLES, FL 34105---4909 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-305 305 18 49 26 68300016668 CAMPBELL, COLIN & CATHERINE 52 SHORE ROAD ROSTREVOR IR IRELAND BT343AA POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-2 C-2 18 49 26 68300004683 CAMPBELL, GERALDINE 15942 MARCELLO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-201 201 18 49 26 24984001363 CAMPOAMOR, FRANK J 12856 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 54 54 18 49 26 24984001185 CANNAN, ROBERT JONATHAN CANNAN 12898 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 45 45 18 49 26 68300005488 CAPITAL INCOME AND GROWTH FUND LLC 4300 STEVENS CREEK BLVD SUITE 275 SAN JOSE, CA 95129---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-306 306 18 49 26 24984001428 CARR, JAMES S JEAN-RAGELIE-CARR 10816 ROYAL GLEN DR ORLAND PARK, IL 60467---0000 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 57 57 18 49 26 68300010088 CARTWRIGHT, DAYLE 1170 RESERVE WAY #303 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-106 106 18 49 26 68300015203 CARUSO JR, ANTHONY 259 MATCHAPONIX AVE MONROE TOWNSHIP, NJ 08831---4080 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-204 204 18 49 26 68300015261 CASSAGNAU, JEAN PAUL JUNE CASSAGNAU 442 SPRUCE AVE WEST ISLIP, NY 11795---2717 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-207 207 18 49 26 68300007347 CATHCART, VAN W & DEBRA A 8 FIELD CREST LN CAPE MAY CRT HSE, NJ 08210---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-303 303 18 49 26 68300016341 CHALASANI, VIDYA D SATYA DEVI CHALASANI 30795 BRUCE LN FRANKLIN, MI 48025---1564 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-207 207 18 49 26 68300007509 CHATEAUVERT, DENIS R & JULIE A 2162 VALENCEVILLE CRESENT ORLEANS, ON CANADA K4A 4K4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 490 490 18 49 26 68300008582 CHEHADE, JOYCE 2671 DE CHAMONIX SAINT LAURENT, QC CANADA H4T 2Y7 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 369 369 18 49 26 68300011362 CHELO, KARA L GARY J=& LYNNE E CHELO 12970 POSITANO PLACE #208 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-208 208 18 49 26 68300004722 CHEN, CHIA-LIN LIH SHEAU CHEN 3282 BANCROFT RD FAIRLAWN, OH 44333---3048 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-203 203 18 49 26 22150002787 CHI, TU H & MARIANNE 1457 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4952 ANDALUCIA LOT 127 127 18 49 26 68300011760 CHIELLA, ANTONIO & RENATA 2294 WUTHERING HEIGHTS WAY OAKVILLE, ON CANADA L6M 0E7 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-201 201 18 49 26 68300005064 CHISHOLM, DENNIS 1420 BEAUMONT CIR FLUSHING, MI 48433---1872 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 396 396 18 49 26 22150000705 CHUGANI, HARRY T & DIANE M 703 MOUNT LEBANON RD WILMINGTON, DE 19803---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 23 23 18 49 26 68300004324 CIAMPO, WILLIAM A 12920 POSITANO PLACE #302 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-302 302 18 49 26 68300008485 CIKRA, LEE 12935 VIOLINO LN #306 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-306 306 18 49 26 68300011304 CLAPPER, JEFFREY C 12970 POSITANO CIR APT 205 NAPLES, FL 34105---4905 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-205 205 18 49 26 68300007907 CLARK, EMILIE MAE 12936 VIOLINO LN #304 NAPLES, FL 34105---4928 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-304 304 18 49 26 24984001062 COLEMAN, ANTON EMIL NANCY EDITH LANDI 12874 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 39 39 18 49 26 68300015287 COLUCCI, ROBERT S & MARIANNE 79 SUSAN DR NEW CITY, NY 10956---4027 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-208 208 18 49 26 68300016642 COUGHLIN, MICHAEL J EILEEN T O'DONOGHUE-COUGHLIN 10100 E TANGLEWOOD CIR PALOS PARK, IL 60464---2612 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-1 C-1 18 49 26 24984001266 COVINO, JAMES B & BARBARA A 12914 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 49 49 18 49 26 68300015928 COX, MICHAEL R 28061 QUIET WATER WAY BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-305 305 18 49 26 68300015601 CROSSMAN, HOWARD F & SHEILA O 1658 CHINABERRY CT NAPLES, FL 34105---3050 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-104 104 18 49 26 68300016228 CRUCERU, DELIA & GABRIEL 48 APPLETON TRAIL BRAMPTON, ON CANADA L6W 4L6 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-201 201 18 49 26 68300010389 CRUCERU, GABRIEL & DELIA 48 APPLETON TRAIL BRAMPTON, ON CANADA L6W 4L6 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-305 305 18 49 26 68300011540 CUSINATO, ANGELO ALLAN POTSIC 3543 WOODRIDGE PL PALM HARBOR, FL 34684---2435 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 505 505 18 49 26 24984001703 CUTRONE, TANYA HARTMUT BOELLMANN 12885 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 71 71 18 49 26 68300004405 CZARNY, EDWARD J & SHIRLEY J 7103 W KEENEY ST NILES, IL 60714---3039 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-306 306 18 49 26 68300010761 DALTON, MADELYN 6545 E SAGE ST INVERNESS, FL 34452---8057 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-205 205 18 49 26 68300005682 DAPRILE, CHRISTINA R 13010 POSITANO CIR #104 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-104 104 18 49 26 24984001787 DEARMAS, EDUARDO & MARIA LUISA 12901 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4806 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 75 75 18 49 26 68300012264 DEBRA F GLADCHUN REV TRUST 746 REGENCY RESERVE CIR # 2401 NAPLES, FL 34119---2365 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-5 D-5 18 49 26 68300008809 DEGNAN, BRIAN T 897 BARCARMIL WAY NAPLES, FL 34110---0902 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-203 203 18 49 26 68300016781 DELELLIS, THOMAS M & MARYANN 6 BROOKSIDE CT LITITZ, PA 17543---7618 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-8 C-8 18 49 26 24984001622 DENG, RUI HONG HUI MING CHEN 12804 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 67 67 18 49 26 68300009109 DENTE ET AL, JOHN F % VINCENT UCCI 9 YVETTE DR E HANOVER, NJ 07936---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 348 348 18 49 26 68300004968 DERBY, ALEX R 8129 LAS PALMAS WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---7135 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-307 307 18 49 26 68300015180 DHALIWAL, BALWINDER S 214 ROLLINGWOOD DR BRAMPTON, ON CANADA L6Y 5J6 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-203 203 18 49 26 68300012329 DICELLO, ANTHONY 117 EDGEWATER CV LAKEWAY, TX 78734---3462 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-8 D-8 18 49 26 68300007745 DIERS, TIMOTHY R & A BROOKE 2545 ROYAL PALM CT NAPLES, FL 34103---4579 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-204 204 18 49 26 68300016820 DINCA, FLAVIU & GABRIELA 12 KIMONO CRESCENT RICHMOND HILLS, ON CANADA L4S 1X5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-10 C-10 18 49 26 68300004285 DINESCU, SORIN RODICA DINESCU 8-THATCHER CRESCENT EAST GWILLIMBURY, ON CANADA L9N 0B8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-208 208 18 49 26 22150002884 DISABATO, DANTE F 1477 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 132 132 18 49 26 68300005462 DIXON, KOREY 20635 ARMADA CT ESTERO, FL 33928---2555 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-305 305 18 49 26 24984001664 DOANE, TERESA WEBB 12877 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 69 69 18 49 26 PL20160001255 500' 7/7/2016 Page 2 of 5 24984001541 DOLL, ALEX JASON 12820 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 63 63 18 49 26 68300007787 DOMBROWSKI, GREGORY J 6514 MONTEREY PT #102 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-206 206 18 49 26 68300004201 DOMIZIO, FRANK CARLO GENTILE 1089 MANNINGTON CT MISSISSAUGA, ON CANADA L4W 3K8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-204 204 18 49 26 68300008142 DOMIZIO, SALVATORE FERNANDO G CUNHA 2210 WATSON ORCHARD RD MISSISSAUGA, ON CANADA L4Y 1Y2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-104 104 18 49 26 68300010842 DONOFRIO, FRANCO LISA MARIE LEFEBVRE 10455 AVENUE DE L'ESPLANADE MONTREAL, QC CANADA H3L 2Y1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-301 301 18 49 26 68300004780 DOUGLASS REVOCABLE TRUST 5097 LOCHWOOD CT NAPLES, FL 34112---3656 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-206 206 18 49 26 68300009280 DROVER, JOSEPH W & KELLY M 8472 DOLFOR CV BURR RIDGE, IL 60527---6328 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-6 B-6 18 49 26 68300004900 DUFAULT, MARC & ALENA 2233 DESCARTES ST ORLEANS, ON CANADA K4A 0W4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-304 304 18 49 26 68300005307 DUMITRU, GHEORGHE & MIRELA 192 VELMAR DR WOODBRIDGE, ON CANADA L4L 8J5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-205 205 18 49 26 68300007266 DURKOVIC, PETER NASER SANZILET DURKOVIC 14344 37TH AVE FLUSHING, NY 11354---5739 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-207 207 18 49 26 68300015708 DYER, ROBERT A & ESTRELLA M 401 RIDING RIDGE RD ANNAPOLIS, MD 21403---1670 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-202 202 18 49 26 68300015245 EBERTZ, MICHAEL J 1220 TONKAWA RD ORONO, MN 55356---9242 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-206 206 18 49 26 68300004984 ECKLEMAN, DEREK 1274 PINE CT NAPLES, FL 34102---5170 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-308 308 18 49 26 68300016723 EGUEZ DOMINGUEZ, LUIS A LAURA H ORTEGA CARPIO 12950 POSITANO CIR APT203 NAPLES, FL 34105---4890 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-5 C-5 18 49 26 287600003 ELFRIEDA H SUTHERLAND TRUST C/O GAYLE ANN DURRANCE 2076 SAGEBRUSH CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---4568 18 49 26 W 264FT + E 264FT OF FOLL, S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 3.94 AC 18 49 26 68300004081 ELKAIM, ROGER 11 RUE DE COLMAR LE VERDI CANNES FRANCE 06400 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-106 106 18 49 26 24984001402 ENGLISCH, RENATE % THOMAS SCHALLER 3308 EUROPA DR APT 27 NAPLES, FL 34105---5606 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 56 56 18 49 26 68300011841 EPOCH USA LLC 3 FORD LANE ALESTREE ENGLAND DERBY ENGLAND DE22 2EX POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-205 205 18 49 26 68300005608 EQUITY TRUST COMPANY % STEPHEN RALSTON 173 HELIGAN LANE UNIT 10 LIVERMORE, CA 94551---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 328 328 18 49 26 68300016480 ERRICO, KEITH A & MARIA A 470 CHESTNUT STREET WASHINGTON TWN, NJ 07676---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-306 306 18 49 26 68300008126 ESCOBAR, HECTOR E & CARMEN I D CHULAVISTA ST PARQ CHULAVISTA #B-2 CARRACAS VENEZUELA POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-102 102 18 49 26 68300005145 FABIANI, DARRYL & SONYA 452 SOUTH CARRIAGE WAY LONDON, ON CANADA N6G 0B2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-104 104 18 49 26 22150000640 FAIRHOMES SILVER LININGS PROPERTIES LLC 139 MAIN ST UNIT 203 UNIONVILLE, ON CANADA L3R 2G6 ANDALUCIA LOT 20 20 18 49 26 68300006128 FALCIONE, KAREN L MICHAEL FALCIONE 307 MEL JEN DR NAPLES, FL 34105---6318 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 297 297 18 49 26 68300007321 FALLON, JOHN & FRANCES 19 HARTLAND ROAD STONEY CREEK, ON CANADA L8E 6C4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-302 302 18 49 26 68300007185 FAVREAU, MARK E & LILLIAN A 193 ELM ST #319 NORTH READING, MA 01844---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-203 203 18 49 26 22150002981 FEDOR, THOMAS S & LUCIA M 10994 WHARTON LANE FISHERS, IN 46038---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 137 137 18 49 26 24984001321 FELICIANO, WENDELL A 12864 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 52 52 18 49 26 68300010541 FERNANDEZ, ERIC J 6 S LIBERTY DR SOUTH BARRINGTON, IL 60010---9119 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 529 529 18 49 26 68300010305 FERRAIOLO, JOHN & PAULA 282 NASSAU RD HUNTINGTON, NY 11743---4327 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-301 301 18 49 26 68300005925 FERRARO, THERESA N 13010 POSITANO CIR APT 301 NAPLES, FL 34105---4921 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-301 301 18 49 26 68300006283 FIOETTI, RICHARD E & BRENDA C 1683 PERSIMMON DR NAPLES, FL 34109---0307 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-6 A-6 18 49 26 68300011443 FITZGERALD, JAMES & CYNTHIA 1350 STONEY RIVER DR MAPLE GLEN, PA 19002---1168 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-304 304 18 49 26 68300006364 FLYNN, WALTER 25216 PFLUMM ROAD LOUISBURG, KS 66053---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-11 A-11 18 49 26 68300012109 FORDACH HOLDINGS INC 1920 IMPERIAL GOLF COURSE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 131 131 18 49 26 68300005022 FORMAN, ROBERT S & DEBORAH J 370 SABAL WAY WESTON, FL 33326---3311 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 392 392 18 49 26 68300011744 FORRESTER, CYNTHIA P 12975 POSITANO CIRCLE #108 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-108 108 18 49 26 68300008469 FOTO, PIETRO & DARLENE 3620 PONYTAIL DR MISSISSAUGA, ON CANADA L4X 1W4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-305 305 18 49 26 68300008524 FOTO, PIETRO ANTONIO DARLENE G FOTO 3620 PONYTAIL DRIVE MISSISSAUGA, ON CANADA L4X 1W4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-308 308 18 49 26 68300015423 FRANCIS, THOMAS 62 WEEKS AVE MANORVILLE, NY 11949---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-307 307 18 49 26 68300011087 FRANKLIN, ROBERT A PO BOX 129 2233 MAXWELL AVE NEWPORT, MN 55055---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 120 120 18 49 26 68300007363 FREIBERT, SHARON & JOHN E JR SHAWN R FREIBERT 1017 CHAMPIONS CIR SIMPSONVILLE, KY 40067---6567 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-304 304 18 49 26 22150002800 FTEJA, HYSEN 1461 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4952 ANDALUCIA LOT 128 128 18 49 26 68300004560 G&L CONSTRUCTION LLC 6301 S GRAND PRAIRIE DR SIOUX FALLS, SD 57108---5301 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-101 101 18 49 26 68300005080 G&R INTERNATIONAL LLC 10613 WATERFORD RD UNIT B TRAVERSE CITY, MI 49684---6265 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 398 398 18 49 26 68300008265 GAVULIC, ANDREW & MELANY 235 E ROLSTON RD LINDEN, MI 48451---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-203 203 18 49 26 68300004502 GENTILE, CARLO FRANK DOMIZIO 1089 MANNINGTON COURT MISSISSAUGA, ON CANADA L4W 3K8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 412 412 18 49 26 68300008100 GEORGE, NICK CORPORATE OFFICE 8313 HOLLY RD STE C GRAND BLANC, MI 48439---2484 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-101 101 18 49 26 22150000886 GHUMAN, A TOM & KIMBERLY 1490 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4951 ANDALUCIA LOT 32 32 18 49 26 68300010428 GIANNONE, NICHOLAS J HILDA BERNHARDT GIANNONE 142 BENNINGTON DR APT 3 # 4 NAPLES, FL 34104---1306 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-307 307 18 49 26 22150002826 GIARRAPUTO, LEONARD J LINDA A GIARRAPUTO 11 OVERLOOK CT MEDFORD, NJ 08055---3834 ANDALUCIA LOT 129 129 18 49 26 68300004926 GILBERTO, MATTHEW GINA GILBERTO 12930 POSITANO CIRCLE #305 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-305 305 18 49 26 68300011469 GLADDEN, THOMAS R & CHRISTINA 12970 POSITANO CIR APT 305 NAPLES, FL 34105---4905 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-305 305 18 49 26 68300015229 GNOFFO, ROSALIE I 12940 POSITANO CIR APT 205 NAPLES, FL 34105---4888 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-205 205 18 49 26 68300010402 GOEDE TR, JOHN C CROMWELL LAND TRUST 8950 FONTANA DEL SOL WAY STE 100 NAPLES, FL 34109---4419 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-306 306 18 49 26 68300005624 GORDON, STEVEN & DONNA E 13000 POSITANO CIR APT 308 NAPLES, FL 34105---4918 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 330 330 18 49 26 22150002761 GREENFIELD TR, HOWARD BRUCE SHERRY HEDDA GREENFIELD TR H B & S H GREENFIELD JT R/T UTD 07/18/06 1453 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 126 126 18 49 26 68300005941 GRIFFITH, JAMES L & POLLY A 5200 BUTLER RD CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-302 302 18 49 26 68300016545 GROVE, TIMOTHY G & CHARI K 1534 WINDY RIDGE CT SALINE, MI 48176---9420 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 95 95 18 49 26 68300012361 GULAS, MILTIADE & DANA 1096 QUAKER TRAIL NEW MARKET, ON CANADA L3X 3E2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-10 D-10 18 49 26 68300009264 GULER, DIDEM 6644 MARBELLA DR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-5 B-5 18 49 26 68300008087 GUROCAK, SERPIL 12936 VIOLINO LANE NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 470 470 18 49 26 68300007224 HAGEDORN, AMY C 12980 POSITANO CIR APT 205 NAPLES, FL 34105---4911 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-205 205 18 49 26 68300015083 HAMILTON, ANN MARIE NANCY R AUSTIN 12935 VIOLINO LN APT 204 NAPLES, FL 34105---4924 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-106 106 18 49 26 68300010266 HARBAUGH TR, GEORGE C TERESITA B HARBAUGH TR PO BOX 845 ROGERS, AR 72757---0845 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-207 207 18 49 26 68300012345 HARRISON, ROBERT J & GINA 12970 POSITANO CIR APT 301 NAPLES, FL 34105---4905 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-9 D-9 18 49 26 68300004528 HART, DANN D 4486 SOUTH SHORE STREET WATERFORD, MI 48328---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 414 414 18 49 26 68300007923 HELGREN, BLAKE GARRETT ROBERT D & BEVERLY C HELGREN 12936 VIOLINO LN APT 305 NAPLES, FL 34105---4928 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-305 305 18 49 26 68300007240 HENRIQUEZ, KLEBER SANTINA STUMPO 29 ASHFIELD DRIVE TORONTO, ON CANADA M9C 4T7 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-206 206 18 49 26 68300007606 HERBERT, GREG A & SUSI 3739 SPRING LAKE LN OWINGS MILLS, MD 21117---1431 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-104 104 18 49 26 68300008702 HERRICK, PAUL ANN HERRICK 5 JEFFERSON DR REVERE, MA 02151---2186 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-106 106 18 49 26 68300016862 HEWITT, CURTIS & DEBORAH 9311 DAYFLOWER STREET PROSPECT, KY 40059---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-12 C-12 18 49 26 258970908 HIWASSE INC % JOHN N BRUGGER TR KENSINGTON PARK C/O NEWELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---5802 13 49 25 E 510 FT OF SE 1/4 & E 510 FT SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LESS COM AT SE CNR SEC 13, N2126.61 FT, W 120FT TO POB, W 390 FT, 13 49 25 68300012028 HOLLOWAY, JOHN & CHRISTINE 70 JESSON RD WALSALL WEST MIDLANDS ENGLAND POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-306 306 18 49 26 68300006160 HOSAPOS LLC 4940 WESTCHESTER CT APT 3704 NAPLES, FL 34105---6670 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 301 301 18 49 26 286560005 HOSPICE OF NAPLES INC 1095 WHIPPOORWILL LN NAPLES, FL 34105---3847 18 49 26 N1/2 OF N1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 AND S 60FT OF E1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 AND N1/2 OF S1/2 OF N1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 1 18 49 26 68300008605 HUGHES, NORMAN PETER HAZEL PAULINE HUGHES WATERFIELD BASLOW ROAD DERBYSHIRE ENGLAND DE45 1AB POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 371 371 18 49 26 68300006089 HURST, KAY C 1323 SW 104TH ST GAINESVILLE, FL 32607---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 293 293 18 49 26 68300005705 HURVITZ, MARK E 3145 CARRIAGE CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-106 106 18 49 26 68300004803 HUTTERLY, JOHN T CHERYL WILSON 12930 POSITANO CIR APT 207 NAPLES, FL 34105---4864 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-207 207 18 49 26 68300006241 HUTTERLY, JOHN T CHERYL WILSON 4022 CRAYTON RD NAPLES, FL 34103---3576 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-4 A-4 18 49 26 68300008168 IGNACIO ESTATES LTD PO BOX 775 NAPLES, FL 34106---0775 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-106 106 18 49 26 68300011401 ILICETO, GREGG & HOPE 115 BURTON AVE STATEN ISLAND, NY 10309---3549 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-302 302 18 49 26 68300015766 IONESCU, CALIN & MAGDALENA 19 INTERMEZZO DRIVE WOODBRIDGE, ON CANADA L4H 3L1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-205 205 18 49 26 68300009002 IRONS, RICHTER & BARBARA 8401 NORTHHAMPTON CT NAPLES, FL 34120---1687 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-305 305 18 49 26 68300012387 J & J ARNOLDINK LLC 393 TROON CT HOLLAND, MI 49423---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-11 D-11 18 49 26 68300015643 JABLONSKI, JAMES J 6278 RED CANYON DR HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80130---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-107 107 18 49 26 24984001046 JAROMIN, MARC J & MICHELLE L 12870 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 38 38 18 49 26 22150000747 JENSEN, KEVIN 1462 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 25 25 18 49 26 24984001347 JOAN I KELLNER REV TRUST 12860 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 53 53 18 49 26 68300004104 KAPLAN, ESHA CHARLES C COSBY 715 SOUTH 18TH STREET #B PHILADELPHIA, PA 19146---1916 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-107 107 18 49 26 24984001127 KAPOOR, SIRINDER K & DENISE 1140 SUNSET VIEW DR BETHLEHEM, PA 18017---3669 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 42 42 18 49 26 68300010923 KEADY, SHEILA A 12965 POSITANO CIR APT 305 NAPLES, FL 34105---4902 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-305 305 18 49 26 68300009044 KELLER, JOHN & RUTH 5433 FREEPORT LN NAPLES, FL 34119---9517 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-307 307 18 49 26 52731003120 KENSINGTON GOLF & CC INC 2700 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34109---5994 KENSINGTON PARK PHASE THREE B TRACT 7 1 13 49 25 52731003023 KENSINGTON PARK MSTR ASSN INC C/O NEWELL PROPERTY MNGMT 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---5802 KENSINGTON PARK PHASE THREE B TRACT R 1 13 49 25 68300015465 KERSTING, RICHARD T 26 JEFFREY DRIVE CHESTER, NY 10918---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 433 433 18 49 26 68300008883 KLUMP TR, ROBERT & CYNTHIA 8472 DOLFOR CV BURR RIDGE, IL 60527---6328 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-207 207 18 49 26 22150002965 KNOTH, STEPHEN & CAROLE 8 CROSSMAN RD CENTERPORT, NY 11721---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 136 136 18 49 26 68300016707 KOLANOVIC, ZELJKO NICOLINA ESTHER KOLANOVIC 12955 POSITANO CIRCLE #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-4 C-4 18 49 26 22150002745 KOLLAS, CHARLES & CATHERINE J 605 ALEX CT CRANBERRY TOWNSH, PA 16066---7917 ANDALUCIA LOT 125 125 18 49 26 PL20160001255 500' 7/7/2016 Page 3 of 5 68300016189 KONANDREAS, LUCAS & GEORGIA 34 KONANDREAS DR STAMFORD, CT 06903---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-107 107 18 49 26 68300010101 KONKOLY, LESLIE F & JANE A 5107 BRANDYWINE DRIVE EAGLEVILLE, PA 19403---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-107 107 18 49 26 68300004146 KOTSOPOULOS, STEVE DON KOTSOPOULOS DAVE KOTSOPOULOS 3524 REBECCA ST OAKVILLE, ON CANADA L6L 6X9 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-201 201 18 49 26 68300015025 KOTSOPOULOS, STEVE THUC VO 5325 PICKETTS WAY BURLINGTON, ON CANADA L9Z 7J6 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-101 101 18 49 26 68300005640 KOZUL, NADA 4401 GULF SHORE BLVD N # 1104 NAPLES, FL 34103---3421 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-101 101 18 49 26 68300005161 KRONCKE, KENNETH 41 INDEPENDENCE WAY MILLER PLACE, NY 11764---2337 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-106 106 18 49 26 68300005585 KURTYKA, KELLY L & JAMES E 13000 POSITANO PLACE #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 326 326 18 49 26 68300010745 LANG, KENNETH & PHYLLIS MARLENE & THED CZAPLA 12965 POSITANO CIR #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-204 204 18 49 26 68300011061 LANG, KENNETH & PHYLLIS THEODORE=& MARLENE CZAPLA 1025 FALLS TERRACE UNION, NJ 07083---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 118 118 18 49 26 68300005789 LAURA E PANICHI TRUST 6737 BRAMBLEWOOD LN CLEVELAND, OH 44143---1577 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-202 202 18 49 26 68300007567 LE, LILY THUAN 13040 LIVINGSTON RD UNIT 7 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-101 101 18 49 26 24984001101 LEFEVRE, JOHN F 809 REGENCY RESERVE CIR # 4103 NAPLES, FL 34119---2334 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 41 41 18 49 26 68300015627 LEFKOW, HOLLY 15899 DELAPLATA LN NAPLES, FL 34110---2806 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-106 106 18 49 26 68300005501 LEHTINEN, DAVID M & KAREN 304 TATTENHALL DR CARY, NC 27518---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-307 307 18 49 26 68300005242 LEQUESNE, NIGEL BLANCHARD HOUSE LA GRANDE ROUTE DES AUGUREZ ST PETER JERSEY CHANNEL ISLAND CHANNEL ISLANDS ENGLAND JE3 7DJ POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-202 202 18 49 26 24984001606 LIU, QING WANZHONG JIANG 803 MYRTLE TER NAPLES, FL 34103---2814 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 66 66 18 49 26 258974001 LIVINGSTON PRO CENTER LLC 719 HICKORY RD NAPLES, FL 34108---3315 13 49 25 THAT PORTION OF THE E1/2 OF SEC 13 AS DESC IN OR 4105 PG 2035 13 49 25 68300011029 LLEWELLYN FUNDING LLC 328 BOWLINE BEND NAPLES, FL 34103---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 114 114 18 49 26 24984001583 LLORCA, MAIKEL & CRISTINA M 12812 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 65 65 18 49 26 68300012400 LO FORTE, ANTHONY & SHERRY B 1426 PLAZA DE ORO BENICIA, CA 94510---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-12 D-12 18 49 26 68300004227 LOVE, WAYNE G & DEBRA A 21 W 710 DORCHESTER COURT GLEN ELLYN, IL 60137---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-205 205 18 49 26 24984001169 LYONS, PAUL J & CYNTHIA A 12894 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 44 44 18 49 26 68300008029 M4PC TR LLC 5150 TAMIAMI TRAIL N STE 505 NAPLES, FL 34103---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 464 464 18 49 26 22150000802 MACH, WILLIAM G & VICKI D 64188 COUNTY ROAD 687 HARTFORD, MI 49057---9417 ANDALUCIA LOT 28 28 18 49 26 68300010583 MAGID, DENNIS & PATRICIA M 12965 POSITANO CIRCLE #102 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-102 102 18 49 26 68300010169 MAMICHE AFARA, RIMA 105 NORTONVILLE DRIVE SCARBOROUGH, ON CANADA M1T 2G9 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-202 202 18 49 26 22150002729 MANTZIDIS, GEORGE 1425 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4952 ANDALUCIA LOT 124 124 18 49 26 68300005543 MARCHIONI, LEO F & CAROL A 109 TOWER AVE MARSHFIELD, MA 02050---5135 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 322 322 18 49 26 68300005404 MARCHIONI, LEO F & CAROL A ROBERT & JEANNE POULIN 13000 POSITANO CIR APT 302 NAPLES, FL 34105---4918 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-302 302 18 49 26 68300015562 MARKOWITZ, CHRISTINE E SETH G MARKOWITZ 7244 ACORN WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-101 101 18 49 26 68300009303 MARSHALL, RALPH & DALIA WILLIAM Z & GEORGETTE FRANCIS 12990 POSITANO CIR #302 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-7 B-7 18 49 26 286520003 MARTIN, DONALD H & MARY ANN 1301 WHIPPOORWILL LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4842 18 49 26 S1/2 OF S1/2 OF N1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NW1/4 18 49 26 68300012125 MATHER, JASON 12975 POSITANO CIR #308 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 133 133 18 49 26 68300009125 MATWEYCHUK, MICHAEL J KAREN D MATWEYCHUK 1811 FLORAL DR WILMINGTON, DE 19810---4525 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 350 350 18 49 26 68300016587 MAZAL, LUMIR 22 RUE DE BALLOON 67 STRASBOURG FRANCE 100 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 99 99 18 49 26 68300004609 MCCLURE JR, JAMES E BERNADETTE A MCCLURE 116 MUIRFIELD PLACE BEAVER, PA 15009---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-104 104 18 49 26 68300008304 MCCOLGAN, JIMMY D 11559 TWIN LAKES DR ORLAND PARK, IL 60467---5234 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-205 205 18 49 26 68300015805 MCDONALD, DANIEL & KIMBERLY 483 HARBOR CT SHOREVIEW, MN 55126---1935 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-207 207 18 49 26 24984001729 MCKAIG, T NEIL & JOAN 12889 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4806 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 72 72 18 49 26 68300007965 MCKENNEY 2011 REV LIV TRUST PO BOX 460399 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94146---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-307 307 18 49 26 68300015342 MCKINNEY, WILLIAM E & ELLEN M 3945 DEEP PASSAGE WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-303 303 18 49 26 22150002842 MEHLER JR, CHARLES V & JULIE P 1469 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4952 ANDALUCIA LOT 130 130 18 49 26 68300007428 MENEFEE TR, SHIRLEY S EDWARD L EDWARD L MENEFEE TR 2378 KING PALM WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---3037 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-307 307 18 49 26 68300015546 MICHAEL J SANTI TRUST 24 LAKESIDE LN NORTH BARRINGTON, IL 60010---6954 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 441 441 18 49 26 68300007169 MICHALS, KATHLEEN E 8032 VIA FIORE SARASOTA, FL 34238---5583 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-202 202 18 49 26 68300010046 MIKTUS, MATTHEW J 12960 POSITANO CIR #102 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-102 102 18 49 26 68300012222 MILDRED D SCHOTT TRUST 361 9TH AVE S NAPLES, FL 34102---6849 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-3 D-3 18 49 26 68300011647 MILLER, JANICE 12975 POSITANO CIR APT 101 NAPLES, FL 34105---4907 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-101 101 18 49 26 68300008663 MISKEE TR, DAWN M D MISKEE REV TRUST UTD 10/27/6 505 CHASE CT EDGEWATER, NJ 07020---1610 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-102 102 18 49 26 68300005129 MONGELLUZZO, PAUL A & KATHY 119 EXETER RD MASSAPEQUA, NY 11758---8126 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-102 102 18 49 26 68300006380 MORGAN, MONICA 13010 POSITANO CIRCLE #207 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-12 A-12 18 49 26 68300016600 MOUDY, ANDY E NANCY E BRONSTEIN 2360 PACIFIC VIEW CT SAN LEANDRO, CA 94579---2798 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 101 101 18 49 26 68300007062 MRAZ, JEROME & MARY 3702 WHIDBEY WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---7519 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-104 104 18 49 26 68300006267 MULLINEUX, KEITH & VALERIE 31 ABBOTTSMEDE CLOSE STRAWBERRY HILL MIDDLESEX ENGLAND TW1 4RL POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGD A-5 A-5 18 49 26 68300009329 MUNDY, BROOKE 13000 POSITANO CIRCLE #303 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-8 B-8 18 49 26 22150000941 MUNRO, ALISTER ANA AVELLAR 1502 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 35 35 18 49 26 68300004188 MURACO, ANDREW MARCO CHRISTIANO 7679 GREEN VISTA GATE NIAGARA FALLS, ON CANADA L2G 5Z3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-203 203 18 49 26 68300009028 NARINE, BERNARD A 32 BREYER CT ELKINS PARK, PA 19027---1350 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-306 306 18 49 26 68300011003 NATAPOW, MARK 1838 MISSION DR NAPLES, FL 34109---7102 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 112 112 18 49 26 68300016040 NAVARRO JR, LINWOOD R & LISA P 123 OLD VOLUNTOWN RD GRISWOLD, CT 06351---8847 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 541 541 18 49 26 68300007046 NEUHAUS, DEBRAH J 930 106TH LN NW APT 15 COON RAPIDS, MN 55433---4311 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-102 102 18 49 26 68300016309 NIAN FINANCING CORP 2055 TRADE CENTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-205 205 18 49 26 68300010826 NIGRO, THOMAS & LUCY 360 STEWART AVE APT 1F GARDEN CITY, NY 11530---4500 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-208 208 18 49 26 68300007949 NOWAKOWSKI, ALOJZY & BARBARA 3569 SOUTH BLVD AUBURN HILLS, MI 48326---3852 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-306 306 18 49 26 24984001761 NOWICKI, ROBERT E & RUTH M 12897 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 74 74 18 49 26 24984001460 OHLIS, BRIAN T 12836 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 59 59 18 49 26 68300008728 OLIVOS JR, ALFONSO ALFONSO J & INES OLIVOS SR 2111 ISLA DE PALMA CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---3407 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-107 107 18 49 26 68300010185 OLIVOS TR, ALFONSO INES OLIVOS TR ALFONSO & INES REV LIV TRUSTS UTD 01/29/09 5548 FOXHUNT WAY NAPLES, FL 34104---4903 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-203 203 18 49 26 68300008207 OMALLEY TR, SYLVIA R SYLVIA R O'MALLEY TRUST 12935 VIOLINO LN APT 108 NAPLES, FL 34105---4924 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-108 108 18 49 26 68300015944 PAKOZDI, GEORGE & KATHY 96 MAYFAIR CRESCENT HAMILTON, ON CANADA L8S 4E7 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-306 306 18 49 26 68300010127 PALMER, CAROL ANN 12960 POSITANO CIR APT 108 NAPLES, FL 34105---4898 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-108 108 18 49 26 68300010907 PALMLEAF LLC 9945 ELSINORE COURT PLAIN CITY, OH 43064---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-304 304 18 49 26 22150000608 PALUMBO, JOHN 1434 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 18 18 18 49 26 68300008003 PARTOZA, BENEDICTA C 20207 BLACK TREE LN ESTERO, FL 33928---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 462 462 18 49 26 68300015889 PARTOZA, REYNOLD 12950 POSITANO CIR #303 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-303 303 18 49 26 68300015782 PAUSYL CORPORATIONAL FL CORP 15899 DELAPLATA LN NAPLES, FL 34110---2806 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-206 206 18 49 26 68300009222 PAYNE, LOLA 1324 BEVERLY LN STREAMWOOD, IL 60107---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-3 B-3 18 49 26 22150002907 PEGRAM, ERRIC & MICHELLE 1485 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 133 133 18 49 26 68300011184 PERCHERON LAND CORP 3894 MANNIX DR STE 208 NAPLES, FL 34114---5405 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-107 107 18 49 26 68300009167 PEREZ-CUEVAS, MARIA DE LOURDES 12990 POSITANO CIRCLE #308 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 354 354 18 49 26 68300005967 PERRONE, JOSEPH & CINDY 368 HILLTOP RD TOMS RIVER, NJ 08753---4271 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-303 303 18 49 26 68300010444 PETER J NOCOLETTA TRUST 8344 LAUREL LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-308 308 18 49 26 68300008223 PETRILLO, DOMENICA 12935 VIOLINO LANE #201 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-201 201 18 49 26 68300008320 PETROVIC, GORAN 36 LAURENTIAN LANE ORILLIA, ON CANADA L3V 7N8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-206 206 18 49 26 68300009387 PETTERSON, FRED E 6309 OAK ST HUBBARD LAKE, MI 49747---9660 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-11 B-11 18 49 26 22150002868 PHILIPONE, FRANK P & DEBORAH E 1473 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4952 ANDALUCIA LOT 131 131 18 49 26 22150000844 PICCOLA, KEVIN M & TAMMY A 1665 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 30 30 18 49 26 24984001282 PIESZAK, CHRISTOPHER ELIZABETH PIESZAK 12872 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 50 50 18 49 26 68300011702 PIGNATELLI, TONY MARNIE BUYERS 2261 GROUSE LANE OAKVILLE, ON CANADA L6M 3Z8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-106 106 18 49 26 68300007486 PISCITELLI, MARIO J 12241 NW 73RD ST PARKLAND, FL 33076---4628 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 488 488 18 49 26 68300008388 PITTELLI, EUGENE & MARIANNE 45 DRAW BRIDGE DR MONROE TOWNSHIP, NJ 08831---7946 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-301 301 18 49 26 68300011786 POLAK, JURAJ & JANA 3854 JENN LYNN CT ORILLIA, ON CANADA L3V 6H2 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-202 202 18 49 26 24984001088 POLK TR, CAROL A CAROL A POLK REV TRUST 12878 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 40 40 18 49 26 287920000 POORE, EDMUND H & BETTY 7025 NIGHTHAWK DR NAPLES, FL 34105---4831 18 49 26 E 264FT OF W 528FT OF S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 2 AC OR 543 PG 76 18 49 26 24984001224 PORTARO, FRANK J & JEAN S 180 MIDDLESEX AVE PISCATAWAY, NJ 08854---0000 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 47 47 18 49 26 68300005844 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES CONDO ASSN INC C/O GOEDE & ADAMCZYK PLLC 8200 NW 33RD ST STE 303 DORAL, FL 33122---1901 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-205 205 18 49 26 287040003 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES MASTER ASSOCIATION INC 12910 POSITANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4830 18 49 26 N1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 & ADDITIONAL SLIVER OF LAND DESC IN OR 3455 PG 58, LESS THAT PORTION NKA POSITANO 18 49 26 68300004667 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I CONDO ASSN INC C/O GOEDE & ADAMCZYK PLLC 8950 FONTANA DEL SOL WAY #100 NAPLES, FL 34109---4420 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-108 108 18 49 26 68300016082 POSITANO ROAD LLC 250 S EXECUTIVE DR RM 301 BROOKFIELD, WI 53005---4272 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 545 545 18 49 26 24984001567 POTTER, JEFFREY J ELIANE B POTTER 12816 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 64 64 18 49 26 24984001240 POWER SUNSHINE HOLDINGS LLC 12921 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4806 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 48 48 18 49 26 PL20160001255 500' 7/7/2016 Page 4 of 5 68300005802 PRESERVE 7965 LLC 562 BLUEBERRY LN FRANKLIN LAKES, NJ 07417---2315 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-203 203 18 49 26 68300004748 PRICE, RICHARD J & EILEEN M 441 SANTALUZ PATH AUSTIN, TX 78732---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-204 204 18 49 26 68300016383 PRICOIU, VIRGIL & IONA 4 CASTLEDENE CRESCENT SCARBOROUGH, ON CANADA M1T 1S1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-301 301 18 49 26 24984001389 RADCLIFF, RUSSEL K & APRIL S 12852 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 55 55 18 49 26 68300009248 RAJABI, PIROOZ & SHOLEH 217 DOUGLAS ROAD RICHMOND HILL, ON CANADA L4E 3H5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-4 B-4 18 49 26 68300010787 RALSTON, STEPHEN 173 HELIGAN LANE UNIT 10 LIVERMORE, CA 94551---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-206 206 18 49 26 22150000828 RASETA, GEORGE G & SANDRA M 1478 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4951 ANDALUCIA LOT 29 29 18 49 26 68300011320 RATEACA, HARALAMBIE & MARIANA 661 NAPA VALLEY WOODBRIDGE, ON CANADA L4H 2J1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-206 206 18 49 26 68300005721 RATLIFF, PAT MARSHALL 13010 POSITANO CIRCLE #107 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-107 107 18 49 26 68300016464 RAY, HEATHER R RONALD J RIGNEY II 7840 SANDPINE CT APT 2101 NAPLES, FL 34104---5885 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-305 305 18 49 26 68300004340 RENDA, CARL ROXANA PECHERO STEPHEN SANDER 12920 POSITANO CIR APT 303 NAPLES, FL 34105---4832 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-303 303 18 49 26 68300016105 RENDA, CARL ROXANNA PECHERO STEPHEN SANDER 3730 MONTREUX LN APT 201 NAPLES, FL 34114---6478 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-101 101 18 49 26 68300011883 RHINO CONDOS LLC 14 BALSAM LN SMITHFIELD, RI 02917---1621 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-207 207 18 49 26 22150000967 RIBBEL, BRUCE KEVIN CHRISTINA M RIBBEL 1506 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 36 36 18 49 26 68300009141 RICCI, MARIO SALVATRICE CREASOR 144 ADRIAN CREZ MARKHAM, ON CANADA L3P 7B3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 352 352 18 49 26 68300008867 RINE, MARK S DEBORAH A MOSHOLDER PO BOX 427 TALLMADGE, OH 44278---0427 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-206 206 18 49 26 68300016503 ROBERTSON, WILLIAM N & JOYCE C 15200 CEDARWOOD LANE #B-205 NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-307 307 18 49 26 68300007800 ROBINSON, TODD D 1070 GROVE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-207 207 18 49 26 24984001745 ROCCA, PAT & CHERYL D 94 SECOND ST ROTHESAY, NB CANADA E2H 1M5 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 73 73 18 49 26 68300005365 RODRIGUEZ, WILFREDO A 13000 POSITANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-208 208 18 49 26 68300006102 ROIC, DURDICA 26 ASHBURY LN STONEY CREEK, ON CANADA LSJ 1X3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 295 295 18 49 26 68300004366 ROMAN, HENRY MIYOUNG CHUNG 1540 SW 155TH AVE WESTON, FL 33326---5000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-304 304 18 49 26 24984001305 ROOF, ROBERT H 12868 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 51 51 18 49 26 68300005860 ROSS, CAROLINE 1301 BENNETT PL HOLLAND, PA 18966---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-206 206 18 49 26 68300007088 ROYAL, RICHARD & LYNN 5819 PERSIMMON WAY NAPLES, FL 34110---2321 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-106 106 18 49 26 68300011809 RPCR REALTY I LLC 3730 MONTREUX LN APT 201 NAPLES, FL 34114---6478 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-203 203 18 49 26 24984000982 RUMLEY, JEFFREY P 951 HAMPTON RD GROSSE POINTE WO, MI 48236---0000 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 35 35 18 49 26 68300011524 RUSHING, ROBERTA R 41 OLD SPRUCE LANE LEVITTOWN, PA 19055---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-308 308 18 49 26 68300012086 RUSSO, CHRISTINE 5 QUAIL RUN HILTON, NY 14468---9335 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 129 129 18 49 26 68300016626 RUSSO, JAMES C & LYNDA M PO BOX 5 MACUNGIE, PA 18062---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 103 103 18 49 26 68300008922 RUSSO, MICHAEL J 5 QUAIL RUN HILTON, NY 14468---9335 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-301 301 18 49 26 68300004382 RUSSO, STEVEN J 201 WESTERVELT PL ORADELL, NJ 07649---2542 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-305 305 18 49 26 68300011621 SAAD JR, SAMUEL J 1915 COCOPLUM WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---3065 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 513 513 18 49 26 68300009183 SAN SALVATORE LLC 4903 RUSTIC OAKS CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4522 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGD B-1 B-1 18 49 26 68300011728 SANCHEZ, LUIS & RAMONA 260 SAINT JAMES WAY NAPLES, FL 34104---6714 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-107 107 18 49 26 68300015106 SANTI, MICHAEL 1555 E RAND RD ARLINGTON HTS, IL 60004---4380 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-107 107 18 49 26 287880001 SANTOS, MARIA L 2316 ANDREW DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 18 49 26 E 264FT OF W 792FT OF S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 2 AC OR 1449 PG 231 18 49 26 287840009 SANTOS, MARIA LEONOR 2316 ANDREW DR NAPLES, FL 34112---0000 18 49 26 E 264FT OF W 1056FT OF S1/2 OF S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 2 AC OR 1244 PG 1779 18 49 26 68300007525 SCARPETTI, KENNETH 16 SAGAMORE ST MANCHESTER, NH 03104---3546 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 492 492 18 49 26 68300015041 SCHIVLEY, G GREGORY N CATHERINE SCHIVLEY 352 KIRKSWAY LN LAKE ORION, MI 48362---2279 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-102 102 18 49 26 68300016684 SCHOTT, ANDREW P & JANET LEA 12950 POSITANO CIR APT 204 NAPLES, FL 34105---4890 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-3 C-3 18 49 26 68300016325 SCHREIBER, ROBERT & MARION J 320 CASEY DR CHICOPEE, MA 01020---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-206 206 18 49 26 68300010622 SCHREIBER, WILLIAM JASON SCHREIBER 12965 POSITANO CIR #106 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-106 106 18 49 26 68300010224 SEDGELEY, JOHN R & SUSAN C 4 BLUE FOX CT LITTLETON, CO 80127---2633 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-205 205 18 49 26 68300010509 SEXTON, JOHN J 6 KERSHAW RD WEST ROXBURY, MA 02132---4513 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 525 525 18 49 26 68300015300 SHANE LIVING TRUST 5827 NW 120TH AVENUE CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33076---4035 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-301 301 18 49 26 24984001826 SHOCKLEY, STEPHANIE S 12909 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4806 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 77 77 18 49 26 68300015902 SICILIA MONACO, TERRI L CAROL ANNE SICILIA 507 FRUIT ST MANSFIELD, MA 02048---3119 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-304 304 18 49 26 68300007884 SIDOTI, FRED 318 10TH ST PALISADES PARK, NJ 07650---2206 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-303 303 18 49 26 68300016749 SIEGEL, JAMES PAMELA SIEGEL 16 BARBARA LN WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590---5302 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGD C-6 C-6 18 49 26 68300015148 SIEGEL, JAMES & PAMELA 16 BARBARA LN WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY 12590---5302 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-201 201 18 49 26 68300005006 SIEGEL, JOHN H & MARY E 443-21 DOE TRAIL AURORA, OH 44202---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM PGA 390 390 18 49 26 68300008427 SINGH, ABHAY & ANURADHA 5 HAWTHORNE VILLAGE RD NASHUA, NH 03062---2262 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-303 303 18 49 26 68300008566 SINGH, ABHAY & ANURADHA 801 SHANUDEEP,10 ALTAMOUNT RD MUMBAI INDIA 400026 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 367 367 18 49 26 68300007622 SMITH, SUSAN 12936 VIOLINO LANE #106 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1100-106 106 18 49 26 68300007143 SONTAG JR, WILLIAM H & DEBORAH 10381 HERITAGE BAY BLVD NAPLES, FL 34120---4597 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-201 201 18 49 26 68300005666 SPAGNUOLO, LUIGI & KIM M 11 PROVIDENCE ST STATEN ISLAND, NY 10304---4306 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-102 102 18 49 26 68300008184 SPOTO, JOHN M & CHERYL A 627 FALCON CREST DR ROCHESTER, NY 14625---1007 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-107 107 18 49 26 22150000763 SRI LIVING TRUST 1466 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4951 ANDALUCIA LOT 26 26 18 49 26 68300008786 STARK, MARY LOUISE SUSAN STONE LEWIS 2560 S 975 E ZIONSVILLE, IN 46077---9458 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-202 202 18 49 26 68300010363 STEPHANS, DEBRA ANAIS KRADJIAN 19 LAUREL CT PARAMUS, NJ 07652---4321 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 600-304 304 18 49 26 68300011582 STILLWELL, ROBERT J 1637 CHINABERRY WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---3053 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 509 509 18 49 26 68300004764 STOICA, MARIN & MARIA 9 RICHWOOD ST TORONTO, ON CANADA M9N 3Y8 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 200-205 205 18 49 26 22150002923 STRODOSKI, RICHARD & SHAWN 1489 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 134 134 18 49 26 68300008249 SUMMERSCALES, JILL A 12935 VIOLINO LN APT 202 NAPLES, FL 34105---4924 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-202 202 18 49 26 68300015407 SVARC, DAG M & NANCY 3039 HORIZON LN #2104 NAPLES, FL 34109---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-306 306 18 49 26 68300008540 SYLVIA R OMALLEY TRUST 402 ASHBURY LN LEMONT, IL 60439---8418 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 365 365 18 49 26 68300011825 TADAS ZUKAS REV TRUST 12975 POSITANO CIRCLE #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---4907 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-204 204 18 49 26 68300009086 TARNOWICZ, MARCIN MICHAL 5237 TREETOPS DR NAPLES, FL 34113---8510 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 346 346 18 49 26 24984001800 THEDFORD, JOHN & MARIA 12905 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 76 76 18 49 26 68300016024 TODD, FORREST DICKSON KENDRA LYN ASKEW 24 NORTHMOUNT AVE TORONTO, ON CANADA M3H 1N4 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 539 539 18 49 26 22150000925 TRAINA, LOUIS J & MARY M 1498 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 34 34 18 49 26 68300004269 TRAVERSA ET AL, ANNA 64 MARSHALL AVE LYNBROOK, NY 11563---1334 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-207 207 18 49 26 22150000789 TWENTE, BRYAN M & KRISTINE L 1470 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---4951 ANDALUCIA LOT 27 27 18 49 26 24984001680 URBANCIC, GREGORY L & JILL S 12881 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4806 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 70 70 18 49 26 68300010664 VAN BEVEREN, RONALD & YVONNE 12001 S VAN BEVEREN DR ALSIP, IL 60803---1746 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-108 108 18 49 26 68300011867 VANBUSKIRK, TODD 10511 SEVILLA DRIVE #201 FORT MYERS, FL 33913---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 900-206 206 18 49 26 68300005187 VARCOE, JAY 8475 E WETHERSFIELD RD SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1400-107 107 18 49 26 68300010800 VASILE, SEBASTIANE MAGDALENA MARA VASILE 111 AVDELL AVE WOODBRIDGE, ON CANADA L4H 1H3 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 700-207 207 18 49 26 68300008508 VAZQUEZ, JOSE & YOLANDA 42 ROBIN HOOD RD MORRIS PLAINS, NJ 07950---3062 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1200-307 307 18 49 26 68300011281 VELLA, DONALD J 12970 POSITANO CIR #204 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-204 204 18 49 26 68300015847 VERNON, COURTNEY L 12950 POSITANO PLACE CIR #301 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-301 301 18 49 26 24984001648 VINCENT TR, NICOLA M NICOLA M VINCENT REV TRUST UTD 2010 12873 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4806 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 68 68 18 49 26 68300007402 VIVIANI, ELEANOR T 71 REDAN DR SMITHTOWN, NY 11787---4462 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1000-306 306 18 49 26 68300008647 VO, THUC THAO LE 2406 WOODCREST DRIVE OAKVILLE, ON CANADA L6M 4S1 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-101 101 18 49 26 68300016163 VOLLMER, RONALD LEE 1449 TARA LANE CHELSEA, MI 48118---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-106 106 18 49 26 68300015588 WADE E GROSZ REV LIV TRUST 6775 MCVEY BLVD COLUMBUS, OH 43235---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 400-102 102 18 49 26 24984001143 WALTON, KEITH MARY CAROL BRENNAN-WALTON 12890 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LN NAPLES, FL 34105---4803 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 43 43 18 49 26 24984001208 WALTON, MARIE S LAKE M WALTON II 7432 TREELINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---9727 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 46 46 18 49 26 68300008061 WEISS, ILAN 2611 CENTRAL AVE BALDWIN, NY 11510---3634 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM PGA 468 468 18 49 26 68300011168 WENNLUND, FREDERICK RUSSELL 12970 POSITANO CIRCLE #106 NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-106 106 18 49 26 68300016422 WESTCOTT, MICHAEL P EILEEN E BATTHANY 5002 NORTONVILLE CT ANTIOCH, CA 94531---7811 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 500-303 303 18 49 26 68300005828 WHITE, JULIE M 13010 POSITANO CIR APT 204 NAPLES, FL 34105---4921 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1500-204 204 18 49 26 24984001020 WHITNEY, RICHARD N & CAROL S 8929 TURIN HILL CT N DUBLIN, OH 43017---9414 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 37 37 18 49 26 24984001525 WILLIS, ROBIN J & WENDY D 12824 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 62 62 18 49 26 68300011427 WINKLE, BRENDAN 99 BEACON HILL DR APT D21 DOBBS FERRY, NY 10522---2443 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 800-303 303 18 49 26 24984001486 WOODWARD, LESLEY IRVINE 12832 BRYNWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34105---4807 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 60 60 18 49 26 68300010525 WOODWARD, PETER A & CAROL M 84 MASON LN RR 1 FENELON FALLS, ON CANADA K0M 1N0 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGA 527 527 18 49 26 68300012280 WURSTLE, KURT R & DA VIDA L 1920 IMPERIAL GOLF COURSE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34110---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III A CONDOMINIUM PGD D-6 D-6 18 49 26 24984001509 YANG DAI PROPERTIES LLC 2910 REGATTA RD NAPLES, FL 34103---0000 BRYNWOOD PRESERVE LOT 61 61 18 49 26 68300015384 YAP-ALVAREZ, MARIA ELBE GARRY ALVAREZ 788 LEICESTER DR NAPLES, FL 34104---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-305 305 18 49 26 PL20160001255 500' 7/7/2016 Page 5 of 5 68300004065 YEAGER, CHRISTOPHER C DWIGHT OLSEN 8776 HIDEAWAY HARBOR CT NAPLES, FL 34120---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES I A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 100-104 104 18 49 26 22150001005 YIN, ANDREW WAI CHAN 1514 SERRANO CIR NAPLES, FL 34105---0000 ANDALUCIA LOT 38 38 18 49 26 68300015067 YON, MICHAEL M MARY A YON JERRY L YON 3274 SEDGE PL NAPLES, FL 34105---3015 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 300-104 104 18 49 26 68300015520 YON, MICHAEL M MARY YON JERRY L YON 3067 CLAIR RD LEXINGTON, KY 40502---0000 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES IV A CONDOMINIUM PGA 439 439 18 49 26 68300008964 ZITANO, NICOLA & CLAUDIA 6849 CALAGUIRO DRIVE NIAGARA FALLS, ON CANADA L2J 4L5 POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES II A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 1300-303 303 18 49 26 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20160001255, Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., representing WCI Communities, LLC on: Tuesday, September 27, 2016, 5:30 pm at the Naples Church of Christ, Main Auditorium, 12760 Livingston Rd, Naples, FL 34105. The subject property is comprised of approximately 9.75 ± acres, located south of Pine Ridge Road on the east side of Livingston Road in Section 18, Township 49 S, Range 26 E, Collier County, Florida. WCI Communities, LLC is asking the County to approve this application, which proposes to rezone approximately 9.75+/- acres from the A, Agriculture Zoning District to the Hamilton Place Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) Zoning District to allow a maximum of 66 residential dwelling units. Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. If you have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail by September 27, 2016 to: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Phone: 239.947.1144 Fax: 239.947.0375 sumpenhour@gradyminor.com 1 TRANSCRIPT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING FOR HAMILTON PLACE RPUD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 Appearances: WAYNE ARNOLD RICHARD YOVANOVICH, ESQ. BARRY ERNST KEVIN CROSS MIKE DELATE JIM BANKS TAMMY LYDAY SHARON UMPENHOUR 2 MR. ARNOLD: -- would like. I know we're all here. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: That would be great. MR. ARNOLD: And it's after 5:30. So, sure, I'll get started. I'm Wayne Arnold and I'm with Grady Minor engineering, here representing WCI Communities, who are the contract purchasers of a 9.8 acre parcel located just north of here on Livingston Road. I have it identified here on the aerial. It's located between Brynwood Preserve and what's known as the Arlington Lakes PUD, but it's Positano Place. With me tonight, I have Barry Ernst and Kevin Cross, both from WCI Communities. And, of course, Rich Yovanovich, I already introduced, but Rich is our land use attorney. Jim Banks sitting here is our traffic engineer. Mike Delate, right behind him, is with Grady Minor & Associates, and he's a civil engineer of the project. Tammy Lyday (phonetic), Tammy, where are you? There you are. Tammy is an environmental consultant working on the project for us. And Sharon Umpenhour, who is sitting right here in the front row recording this meeting. Sharon sent out the mail notices for the meeting tonight, but we're required by the county to record these meetings, either provide a video or audio recording. So we typically just create an audio and then have the meeting transcribed. So if you didn't sign in, I encourage all of you to sign in. The county likes us to provide to them the sign-in sheets so they can see who attended and how well it's attended. And then, of course, they see our meeting notes. And then Eric Johnson back here with Collier County government. It's the developer's meeting, but Eric is here representing Collier County. He's the project planner working on this at the county level and is here to answer any questions you might have that deal with the county or process or procedure that I can't answer. So that's kind of everybody who's in the room, and I'd encourage you to move forward if you'd like. I don't have a lot of exhibits to show you, but starting off with the aerial photos, we're all clear where the property is. I saw several of you looking at the aerial photograph. And I've got another, more specific aerial if we had other questions from immediate neighbors that we can talk about. But this process that we're in, we're holding a neighborhood information meeting, which means we have filed to rezone the property from agriculture to a planned unit development. We're calling it the Hamilton 3 Place PUD. We're proposing 66 units on the just under ten acres. And we're within a portion of the density band that is around the I -- Pine Ridge and I-75 interchange. We're qualified to ask for density bonuses up to seven units an acre. We're just under seven units an acre for the project. The process, we establish a draft planned unit development document and it includes the permitted uses we're asking for. It includes development standards for those uses and it also includes a master plan. And what we have come up with as a conceptualized master plan, it essentially shows an access point on Livingston Road. It's been located as far north on the parcel as we can to meet the county's other access spacing requirements between driveways on Livingston Road. We've identified a couple of residential tracks along what's going to be either a cul-de-sac or call that a hammerhead. We have an amenity area that's located toward the east, and then we've placed a water management area and we have an on-site native preservation area that we've located immediately to the east. And just for orientation, I know Sharon received a few calls from folks at Andalucia, and that property is part of what was the Arlington Lakes PUD, and you all have a preservation area that separates our two properties, and then, of course, we have our preservation area that I showed you. So your preserve areas is about a couple hundred feet wide and our preserve area varies, but it's a minimum 50 feet wide. It may be 80 to 100 feet in places. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Excuse me? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) 50? MR. ARNOLD: It can be a minimum of 50. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And your water area, the water management -- MR. ARNOLD: The water management area has to be at least 100 feet in width, but it looks like, from this exhibit, Mike, it's a little larger. We can ask Mike Delate, who's the project engineer. We've submitted plans to the -- did we submit to the Water Management District yet? MR. DELATE: Not officially. MR. ARNOLD: Not officially. We're working on plans to submit to the Water Management District, so -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yeah, because our preserve area is only about 100. 4 MR. ARNOLD: Okay. I've scaled it on aerials and it appears to be closer to 200, at least by our calculations from -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: But, anyway, so we have a preserve area separating ourselves from your preserve to the east, and then, of course, we've identified the two residential tracts. And like I said, we're asking for a variety of residential dwelling unit types, multi-family, single family detached, single family attached, and two family. And -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Are there any plans for that, that you can share? MR. ARNOLD: I'm sorry. I didn't catch that. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Do you have plans yet for it that you can share? MR. ARNOLD: Well, not really. WCI is going through the process. You know, they're developers of Livingston Lakes, just a little farther north on Livingston. And I know that we have internally laid out just to see what fits, product that's very similar to those, and a series of multi-family type buildings, and most of those buildings are six-plex that are being newly constructed. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Similar to Positano? MR. ARNOLD: No. Similar to what they're building at Livingston Lakes for WCI. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: What's the height of those? MR. ARNOLD: We're proposing in our document for the multi-family buildings, I can tell you we're asking for, right now -- and some of this is subject to change but I don't expect these to -- we have building height for -- zoned height for multi-family buildings of 30 feet with an actual height of 35 feet. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Are you limited to three or less? MR. ARNOLD: I don't think -- yeah, I don't think we could certainly fit more than three stories in 30 feet, in 35 feet. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Will they put that in writing, that it would be for three or less? MR. ARNOLD: I don't know. I'll leave it to Barry, but I mean, I think that's a pretty easy commitment to make if we're sticking with the 30 and 35 feet. It would be not to exceed three stories. MR. ERNST: I think most of the product we are looking at is either two-story multi or single family, which would be one or two story. I don't think any of 5 our plans right now show three story. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: That's kind of my introduction. I'm happy to entertain questions from you all or if you have other process questions, I can certain do that. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I have one more question about the back area. MR. ARNOLD: Sure. Okay. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: The amenities that you have there -- MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: -- what type of amenities will be back there? MR. ARNOLD: Well, we've asked for kind of what we consider the standard amenity for swimming pools, potential tennis courts, you know, a variety of things. I don't -- Barry, I don't think you all are far enough along to say exactly what's going to be there, but it's a small community of 66 homes. I don't think it's going to be an extensive amenity area, but we're required to show, if we're going to have a centralized amenity, where that might be on the property. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: You talk about a buffer in the form of a lake on the east side of the property. What about on the north and south side of the property? MR. ARNOLD: Well, on the north side of the property, the county requires us, between your single family homes that are in Brynwood, to have a minimum 15-foot wide buffer. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: So we're providing that. We also have a water management area that's going to give us a little bit greater separation. I don't know that Mike's at a point where we can tell you exactly how wide that's going to be, but we're designing that to be more of a dry retention water management system, and then this would be a lake area behind our development to the east. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So the 15 feet -- can you tell me where on the one side, I'm in Brynwood, I don't know if anyone else is here from Brynwood, but there's a fence along the property at Brynwood. Is that fence right on the lot line between the two properties or -- MR. ARNOLD: Mike, I don't -- Mike, do you know? MR. DELATE: I believe it's just a little bit north of the lot line. MR. ARNOLD: So you think the fence would be offset on the Brynwood side by a few feet? MR. DELATE: At most. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. 6 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. So, I mean, there's very little distance right now between the -- between the street of Brynwood on the south side of Brynwood and that fence. MR. ARNOLD: Uh-huh. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And then they're looking at a 15-foot buffer. (Indiscernible) are we looking at? MR. ARNOLD: Well, the county requires a type B buffer to have trees every so many feet and then it also requires you to have a certain opacity, which can be made up of a combination of berm hedge, berm wall, wall only, things like that. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. Well, has a plan -- decided on a wall or (indiscernible)? MR. ARNOLD: I don't -- I don't know that WCI is that far along in their decision on that. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. Your property is going to be looking right at our property. There won't be much of a buffer. MR. ARNOLD: Well, I think the good news, from a design standpoint, with yours, your street is further separating at least the residences from our community. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) the street? MR. ARNOLD: Right. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: To be perfectly honest, I can hear Positano from my house and I'm on the south side of that property. So you're going to drop another 66 houses in between me where (indiscernible) I can hear people come and go in Positano with their cars and their car clickers and the alarms at all different times. 15 feet doesn't sound like an awful lot to me. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: No. Well, plus, if you (indiscernible) two-story condos, you're -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Or three. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: If you don't have much of a buffer, your condos are going to (indiscernible) tough sale right at our property, since you're very close by (indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Okay. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: What is the current breakdown now being planned for freestanding, single family homes? How many of those? How many multi-family three-story condo units? MR. ARNOLD: We don't have a specific breakdown. The process we're in now for zoning, we have to establish how many of any type, and then the types of units we're requesting, and we don't have a breakdown. But on this type of project, I mean, it's going to go probably one or the other. Like Barry said, if 7 you're single family, I can't net 66 homes if I do single family detached housing. I mean, you can see what we have to the north on Brynwood as a neighbor, and you probably net three to four units per acre if you go single family detached, but for multi-family, we're confident we can fit the 66 units. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Do we have a concept now of what the square footage range would be on these? MR. ARNOLD: We've established minimums for purposes of our zoning document. WCI, they're looking at product type. They will compare sales at Livingston Lakes up the street. They will look, when they come on the market, you know, who their other competition is and refine those. But we've established minimums as part of the PUD document. And I can tell you what those are if I put on my glasses so I can read them to you. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Please do. Thank you. MR. ARNOLD: We have, just to give you a (indiscernible) minimum for multi-family units, we have 1,000 feet that we're proposing, and for single family detached, 1,500 square feet. And then we have a variable lot line single family, which is a smaller single family lot line. And those are 40 feet wide units, so we could probably net more than -- a little bit more than four units an acre on those, but those are proposed to be 1,000 feet minimum, as are any of the other attached product. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Would the lots be large enough for the freestanding single family homes for swimming pools? MR. ARNOLD: You know, I -- I'm assuming so. We're making them about 50 by 100, which is kind of standard for what we do for other WCI communities. And not every -- we typically size the lots so that it can accommodate that if that option exists, if you want, as a potential homeowner to have the pool option and the lot sized adequate to put in the pool. Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Can you tell us, when they prepare the land, I imagine the back section would remain with the trees. Is there any effort to maintain any of the existing trees or is it going to be pretty much clear cut and everything gone? MR. ARNOLD: Well, I think most likely -- we're showing our preserve area to the far east, and that would have to remain as native vegetation. So there might be some exotic removal out of that, but I'm assuming, when we come in to put in the streets and the 8 infrastructure, it's going to be pretty much you know, cleared of vegetation. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So like between Positano, there really wouldn't be anything left there. It would be cleared all the way to the lot line? MR. ARNOLD: Right. It's going to be a re-established landscape buffer. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, uh-huh. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Yeah. Okay. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, ma'am. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Do you have a plan for your drainage? How are you doing your drainage plan on there? Is it -- MR. ARNOLD: Mike, do you want to stand up and maybe just explain conceptually what you're proposing for drainage? MR. DELATE: Sure. Conceptually (indiscernible) water management on the north side here. It will be dry. It won't be a lake. It will discharge it to the lake on the back side. The size yet to be determined. And incorporated in that is the preserve area. That ultimately discharges to a large drainage (indiscernible) that stretches from Pine Ridge Road north all the way out to I-75 south and west. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: You're basing it on grading? MR. DELATE: Yeah. It will be all filled in here and then all the water is attenuated in the dry/wet water management areas before discharge. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: But by grading it, you're going to be (indiscernible) like we are pretty much? MR. DELATE: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And we have a lot of issues with it, a lot of drainage issues in our community. So we want to make sure water doesn't push in that could go through our preserve and get in. We're having already problems. MR. DELATE: No. This area back here was designed years ago with the Water Management District. You can see it stretches from 75 -- excuse me -- Pine Ridge Road all the way up and it goes down and around. You can't see the connection out at 75, but this is a flowway or drainage way that is intended for folks to discharge back into there. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I'm glad you said intended for that because they don't (indiscernible). MR. DELATE: Yeah. Portions are (indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) water 9 flowway is not -- MR. DELATE: This is in good condition back here (indiscernible) Arlington. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And everything from Livingston runs back there. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: This strip (indiscernible) 9.8 acre total, that includes the lake on the east end of the property? MR. ARNOLD: That's the entirety of the property, yes. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. So if you take that and add any buffer beyond that to the next community, you substract those out, how many acres are you left at to develop on for homes or condos? MR. ARNOLD: Well, for our (indiscernible) acreage is on here. Our breakdown right now, the entire site is about 9.7 something acres, and we've got it broken down -- I don't think we've broken it down quite that way, but our preserve area is just under, I think, a half an acre, and then the amenity area is about a half an acre. So it's going to be probably 70 percent of the site that's going to support the residential development. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So if you take 70 percent of basically ten acres, you've got about seven acres to work with, you've got 66 properties, some simple math makes me think there's no way you can get, you know, a couple single family homes is (indiscernible) basically going to be twin villas or condos (indiscernible)? Seven acres and 66 units (indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: That's what I'm saying. I think if you decided to do a single family detached product here, you're going to net significantly fewer units. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Right. MR. ARNOLD: But for presenting purposes, we have to establish our maximum that we can work within, and then, you know, as the product type, which would change, we may end up with fewer units, but we can't end up with more. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Maximum (indiscernible) you know, maximize their income, so I would imagine there's going to be more (indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Who was next? You, sir? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: How does -- how does your maximum proposed zoning, 66 units, compare to the existing density in Positano? MR. ARNOLD: You know, I've got their document. I can look that up if you, you know (indiscernible). Mike, can you look that up for me? You've got the 10 document in there. I can tell you that. Yes, ma'am. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Your preserve (indiscernible) is that the minimum preserve that needs to be satisfied (indiscernible) property (indiscernible) off site? MR. ARNOLD: No. This is the on-site preservation that we're required to meet the county's native vegetation requirements. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: It is (indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Yes. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: 15 percent, is that what it is? MR. ARNOLD: It is -- is it 15 percent, Sharon, or is it 10 for this? MS. UMPENHOUR: 15 -- MR. ARNOLD: It is -- MS. UMPENHOUR: -- of the existing native. MR. ARNOLD: 15 percent. MS. UMPENHOUR: (Indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Yeah, it's based on the existing amount of native vegetation. A lot of the site is exotics, so. Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's been my experience that WCI has built some very nice, high quality places. And when they get to work, they really get it done fast and very good quality efficiency. But because of that, you're able to move so quickly. Do you have any timetable at all? Is this like a one-year project, nine months, a year and a half? MR. ARNOLD: Well, the zoning process we initiate first, and that's where we are now. We don't have hearing dates established, but after this, we're going to continue to work with staff on some sufficiency items. We'll have a Planning Commission hearing in the couple of months, few months, and then they will make a recommendation to the County Commission. So we would expect to be before the County Commission, realistically, probably first of the year at the earliest at this point. But Mike Delate is working on their South Florida Water Management District permit application right now, and once we get a little further along in the zoning process and feel like we've worked out a lot of issues at least at staff level, we'll make the submittal to the Water Management District, because their process takes another six, eight, you know, ten months, potentially, to get through that process. So, you know, we're still probably, very safe to 11 say eight to ten months away from ever, you know, (indiscernible) put a shovel in the ground. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And is there a timeline once the shovel is in the ground, you think maybe 12 months is realistic? MR. ARNOLD: You know, I don't know. Barry, you may have a better feel for the construction schedule, but it's going to be, you know, one phase. They're going to come in and do the entire project as one phase, most likely. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I agree with the gentleman in the back (indiscernible) that WCI builds some great communities. With the likely purchase of WCI by Lennar, do you envision any changes to your current plans or -- as far as their quality of building and the landscaping? Because Lennar and WCI are not the same builders, much although the newspaper says they are, both luxury builders, clearly there's a difference between the two builders, and there always has been. MR. ARNOLD: Well, I don't think I can answer that question, because it's my understanding that all of the Lennar potential merger isn't complete at this point and that may take -- that may take some time or -- I mean, Barry, I don't know, is it possible it might not even happen or -- I don't know, honestly. And Barry probably doesn't either, exactly. MR. ERNST: Yeah. MR. ARNOLD: This is also new to all of us. MR. ERNST: Currently, it's business as usual and we're proceeding on with our plans. We're not changing anything. So we don't know yet. So after the next 30 days, 35 days, we'll have a much better idea. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. And (indiscernible) be appraised of any changes that might come along with the plans that we're discussing now if and when the merger does happen? MR. ERNST: Would we -- I'm sorry. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Would we be appraised of any changes that might come down the pike if and when the merger or plan -- MR. ERNST: Certainly. You may find out before we do. MR. ARNOLD: Just to answer this gentleman's question on density, if I could. Mike looked it up and the Arlington PUD, which is what is part of Andalucia and Positano, was -- did you say 5.3? MR. DELATE: Six. MR. ARNOLD: Six units per acre, and the Brynwood was at 5.3 units per acre and we're at about 6.6 units 12 per acre. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: So you'd be higher -- MR. ARNOLD: Just slightly a little higher. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Higher on every one of them. MR. ARNOLD: Yep. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And I think everyone's (indiscernible) probably to keep it (indiscernible) people or lower than (indiscernible). There's been -- I do think that -- I think WCI has always had a great product. I've lived here forever, but density is an issue. And I think that's what we all believe it could be. We're worried about the density more than anything. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. Yes, ma'am. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Why would you want to put that there, that little tiny strip? Surely, there must be other places that -- is there no place left in Collier County? MR. ARNOLD: There's not much in the urban area. It's down to finding the small infill parcels like this, and the county actually has policies that are encouraging people to utilize infill parcels so it keeps less pressure from having to build new infrastructure east of town. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: That's the next question. How is Livingston Road going to be able to take 66 homes which viably have two cars per home, possibly two point some because it's a school -- favorable school district area, how much more traffic can we take dumped onto Livingston? We already have signs up cautioning people that there are problems with anger management, and it's probably true as it is completely wall-to-wall traffic at 5:30 at night? MR. ARNOLD: Well, I'll let Jim Banks tell you what kind of analysis we have to do for the county's zoning process, and I'm sure he can tell you what the level of service is on the roadway. It may not be exactly as your operational characteristics are, because, you know, the county tells us what peak hour we need to model. So, Jim -- MR. BANKS: Right. MR. ARNOLD: -- if you want to give a -- MR. BANKS: Yeah, the county monitors all their major roads, like Livingston Road. And we're required to actually determine whether or not there's adequate capacity to support this project as well as forthcoming projects. And according to the county's records, they actually do the counting system, we don't. We actually tap into their database. We pull their information out 13 and then we look at the additional traffic that our project would add into the -- into what they're claiming will be what's out there today plus what's in the future. If we determine that the level of service on Livingston Road is -- there's actually a substantial amount of capacity still remaining on that road. I can tell you the exact numbers. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And so I ask you something. We have traffic (indiscernible) warning signs telling us, you know, aggressive driving will be whatever, because it is quite hectic. MR. BANKS: Well, there's -- I mean, because there's a couple of knuckleheads out there driving around on the road that drive aggressively -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Several. MR. BANKS: Several or whatever your perception is, it doesn't mean that there's not available capacity. I mean, that's -- what you're talking about is a police enforcement issue, not really a road capacity issue, and we can't control the -- every so often the idiot that's out there on the road that's driving recklessly or -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: But there's a large volume of traffic. MR. BANKS: I'm sorry? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: There is a large volume of traffic. And Pine Ridge is even worse. So pouring more people on Pine Ridge -- MR. BANKS: Yeah, Pine -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: We can't even get -- I can't go from Pine Ridge in the morning to Livingston without going through four lights. MR. BANKS: Yeah. Pine Ridge Road definitely is carrying much more traffic than what Livingston Road does, but our direct impact is to Livingston Road. And by the time we get up to Pine Ridge Road, this project, it does not -- 66 multi-family or let's say it's going to be 35 single family or 50 single family developed there, is going to not generate that much traffic. It sounds like that would be something that would generate a lot of trips, but it really doesn't. 66 units does not generate that much traffic. But just to directly specifically address your question, the -- Livingston Road is functioning at -- it's projected to, by the year 2020, including the traffic associated with this project, to have a total of 1,519 trips on a road that can accommodate 3,100 vehicles. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. BANKS: So it's operating at less than 50 14 percent of its capacity. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Then it's considered at its full -- MR. BANKS: It's a level service -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: -- (indiscernible) stage for that? Like this is all they're going to build it wide? This is considered full build at this point? MR. BANKS: Yeah. Livingston Road is built -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay. MR. BANKS: -- is expanded to its maximum, and there's a substantial amount of capacity still remaining on the road. MR. ARNOLD: This gentleman hasn't had a chance. Let's let him speak. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Question. If you do multi-family, can you give us a price range that you think it will be at? MR. ERNST: I couldn't. You could probably look down the road at Livingston Lakes and check those products out and it would be similar. Of course, coming on to the market a year and a half from now, I can't really tell you what the market is going to be at that time, but, I mean, you could -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I wasn't asking you for what the market is going to be in a year and a half. I said what kind of price range do you think you'll come out with this product? You must have some idea or you wouldn't be able to do a profit and loss statement. MR. ERNST: Right. I don't have that information. I can get that information to you, an approximate range, but I don't have that information to give you tonight. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And her question about Livingston, there's obviously capacity because we can all travel 65 miles an hour during the day and it seems to cause no trouble, but what we need is somebody to enforce the law. MR. ARNOLD: I think that's exactly what our traffic engineer said, so thank you. Yes, ma'am? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I think he was before me. MR. ARNOLD: Okay. Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Just a question. There was some talk about bringing Livingston Road -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Green. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Greens (sic) Road through to Livingston. Is that still part of the -- would that affect you? MR. BANKS: I think that's off the county's long-term plan now. And that's not reflected in this -- 15 our report we analyzed because it's not a funded project, but I don't think that's even going to happen anymore. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. MR. BANKS: I can't guarantee it, but -- MR. ARNOLD: Yes, ma'am. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I saw the new driveways going in now at the north side of the property versus the south (indiscernible) property closer to Positano. MR. ARNOLD: Uh-huh. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: We -- I'm in Brynwood and we have an access lane, I guess is the best way to put it, turning into the project. How far -- what's the distance between where that starts and where that driveway ends? MR. ARNOLD: Between our access points? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yeah. Because it looks awfully close to me from here. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. ARNOLD: Well, here's yours. Here's ours. I think, Jim, does it have to be a 660 foot spacing between Brynwood's entrance and ours? MR. BANKS: Yeah. Minimum 660 feet. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: The actual entrance, not the access -- not the access lane that starts prior to the actual entrance? MR. BANKS: Right where the driveway is. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Okay. MR. ARNOLD: We'll have -- we'll have a right turn lane into our project. MR. BANKS: Yeah. MR. ARNOLD: As do you. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: As do -- my fear is that they will see us making a right-hand signal to turn into our property, not their property, and there could be some kerfuffle on their access coming out and we're trying to turn in. MR. BANKS: No. The right turn lane would be several hundred feet north of your entrance. In addition, you're talking about the same people driving -- entering -- I mean, going to be -- UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: I'm talking about people exiting, making the right-hand turn while we're trying to make the right-hand turn into our access road. We have that access lane before we actually enter our driveway. I'm asking what the spacing is between -- MR. BANKS: Oh, okay. It will be 660 feet. So you will not -- you will not have a conflict. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: It can't be 660 feet. 16 UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: No, it can't be. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: It can't be. I'm saying from the end of the -- of the roadway (indiscernible) the new project -- (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: -- to our turn lane coming into, not the actual entrance, but where we have that extra lane to make a turn, it's not 660 feet. MR. BANKS: Oh, oh, oh. MR. ARNOLD: I think -- do you want -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Two (indiscernible) lanes right on top of each other. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Thank you. That's what it's called. I couldn't remember what it was. MR. ARNOLD: We call it a right turn lane or deceleration lane. Do you want to address something? MR. BANKS: Well, I want to make sure I understand exactly what she's talking about. I realize now that we're talking about -- MR. ARNOLD: Do you want to come -- maybe come up and point to an aerial photo so we can make sure we're answering your question. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: We're talking about the current driveway access to this project is way down here. It's being shifted, according to that little diagram, up to about here. We start our little turn lane, right turn lane, right at the edge of this row of houses. What's the distance between that driveway and when we become our right turn lane? MR. BANKS: Oh. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's going to be tight. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Yes, it is. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Since we're looking at the map and talking about traffic -- MR. ARNOLD: Can we calculate that? MR. BANKS: I still think it's -- UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). (Multiple simultaneous speakers.) MR. BANKS: Huh? I'm sorry? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: (Indiscernible). MR. BANKS: Yeah, but I still think it's well over 100 feet. MR. ARNOLD: Yes, sir. I'm sorry. (Indiscernible) question? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: I just want to (indiscernible) back on the traffic and turn lanes, et cetera. Traffic that's coming from the south on Livingston Road that are residents of the new community, 17 will they be forced to use the same turnaround, or is there any plans to make a straight cut-across? MR. BANKS: No. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: It's just more people doing an U-turn on Livingston Road. MR. BANKS: They will be required to make a U-turn to the south. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: And you don't have any qualms about the number of cars doing a U-turn right there? MR. BANKS: One of the things that we're going to have to do when we pursue final development plans when we figure out what the product is, whether it's single family or multi-family, the county will make us go down and look at the left turn lanes to make sure they're adequate to where it would accommodate the additional traffic that would be generated from this site. So that turn lane, if it -- if it needs to be extended based on the additional traffic, then we would be required to do that. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Okay. That U-turn is -- doing a U-turn onto a busy northbound (indiscernible) on Livingston. MR. BANKS: Right. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: (Indiscernible) then there's going to be more people doing it. MR. BANKS: Right. And I'd like to get back to the lady's question earlier about that separation or distance. That's one of those things that we will -- I think there's more than adequate distance, but that's one of the things the county would have us look at to make sure we have separation for that turn lane just to prevent that from happening, what you're talking about. MR. ARNOLD: Yes. And with regard to the overall separation, as Jim mentioned, the 660 feet, there are exceptions to that because, you know, they have to grant access to the property and they have to try to make these work, so sometimes there are less than 660 foot separations. I just thought I'd clarify that for the record. MR. BANKS: Yeah. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: And that's -- I'm sorry. The (indiscernible) you're saying is driveway to driveway, per se? MR. ARNOLD: That's how the county measures, yeah. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Right. MR. ARNOLD: That's not to scale, by the way. Yes, sir? UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: My view is maybe different than anyone else in here, but for a societal 18 standpoint, I think more density is beneficial and I'm actually surprised that there were only 66 units on there. I really thought you'd get 120 or something like that. Now, no one wants it in their backyard, I understand that, but certainly it's great if we don't have to destroy the Everglades and we all live together closer and a little more efficiently. Can you tell us how the number 66 came up and the range you use? Is that strictly planning guidelines you have to go by? MR. ARNOLD: The county has a policy that says because of our proximity to what's an activity center, we can ask for up to seven units an acre, our maximum. We're at 6.6, plus or minus, and so we're approaching the maximum we can ask for with a couple of exceptions, and it's probably a bad word and we're not proposing it, but unless we become an affordable housing project, is the only way we could qualify for more than seven units per acre, and we're not going to (indiscernible) affordable housing project. Yes, sir. UNIDENTIFIED MALE VOICE: Did you mention earlier what's currently proposed for the amenity area? MR. ARNOLD: I think I said we're not quite sure. We made provisions for there to be standard stuff that most communities would have, pools and courts and things of that nature, but I don't think WCI is far enough along. It's going to vary. If they end up with more of a single family product, the amenity package will be different than if they end up with a multi-family product. Anybody to have a turn that wants to say something? Ask a question? Let me just go back to process while you're pondering that. If you received notice for this meeting, it means that your house or residence was within 500 feet of our property boundaries. We try to notify associations that are registered with the county. If somebody doesn't receive notice that's here and didn't, you know, make sure you signed in and we'll send you out any other e-mails that, you know, when we provide information, we can do that. You're going to see, for our next meeting, the county will send out a notice for the Planning Commission meeting with the same notice requirements and then we're responsible for posting the large, you know, four by eight signs that you've seen around town for other zoning actions on the property, and that will 19 precede the Planning Commission public hearing that we're required to have, and will stay up through the County Commission hearing. So if you'd like to sort of keep abreast of, you know, where we are in the process, if you want to give us your e-mail address, we can include you on next rounds of submittal documents so you can at least have our master concept plan. If there are any changes, you'll be aware of those and stay plugged in. Yes, ma'am. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: How long will all that take? MR. ARNOLD: Well, I think, optimistically, around the first of the year if we could get to the County Commission. At this point, we're, you know, almost in, what, October, right? So county staff probably has a few more weeks left on our review before we get comments back, if any. And then we'll be scheduled for Planning Commission. But I think the time from we're deemed sufficient to get to a Planning Commission hearing is going to be at least a month. Eric, you can tell me if I'm wrong, but at this point, I'm guessing November is our earliest Planning Commission date we could even have and -- MR. JOHNSON: Yeah, there's two different Planning Commission meetings, November 3rd and November 17th. And the Board of County Commissioners is only meeting once in November and once in December. I'm not sure what the schedule is in January, but, conceivably, your statement from before about going to the Board of County Commissioners in January seems very likely. MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. I think it's possible. And like I said, you'll be noticed and you'll see signs and feel free to contact us. Sharon left business cards out near the sign-in sheet if any of you would like to do that. I'm happy to have your e-mails, but she's in the office a lot more than I am to make sure that the information gets either back to you or to me so we can get it out to you or answer questions that you might have. So any other comments or questions? If not, we can close the meeting and -- yes, ma'am. UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE VOICE: Do you have a website that you're going to put up to keep people abreast of what's going on? MR. ARNOLD: No. But we've just had a conversation with county staff members just tonight that we were saying that, you know, with the technology changes, 20 there might be a better way to share information than to continue to conduct these types of meetings physically as we do, because with web links and things, I mean, most of us at least have access. And I understand -- I like hard copies of things, too, and even with that, you can request copies, and I think Eric pointed out, you know, you could have frequently asked questions. So, you know, the people who have questions about certain things, you can see what other people have asked questions. I mean, it makes a lot of sense, but the county is not quite there. I mean, this process has evolved a little bit over the years, but it's one that the county thought was important that we at least come out during the process and make sure you're aware that something is going on near you and tell you where we are in the process and what we're planning. MS. UMPENHOUR: You can go on the county's website, and there's -- the petition has a PL number in their CityView portal, and you can go on there and look at the documents. So if you want to do that, just let me know. MR. ARNOLD: And can you type in the project name, Hamilton Place, or do you type in WCI? MS. UMPENHOUR: You can type in Hamilton Place. You can type in the petition number. If you have the folio number for the property, you can type that in. MR. ARNOLD: Anything else? Adjourned. Thank you all for coming out. I appreciate it. (Proceedings concluded.) 21 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I, Joyce B. Howell, do hereby certify that: 1. The foregoing pages numbered 1 through 42 contain a full, true and correct transcript of proceedings in the above-entitled matter, transcribed by me to the best of my knowledge and ability from a digital audio recording. 2. I am not counsel for, related to, or employed by any of the parties in the above-entitled cause. 3. I am not financially or otherwise interested in the outcome of this case. DATED: October 4, 2016 SIGNED AND CERTIFIED: ________________________ Joyce B. Howell 11/28/2016 11/28/2016 11/28/2016