The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 01/04/2017 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION Municipal Services Taxing & Benefit Unit NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 4, 2017 THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD WILL MEET AT 1 PM ON JANUARY 4 AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER AT PELICAN BAY, LOCATED AT 8960 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108. AGENDA 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll call 3. Agenda approval 4. Approval of 12/07/16 Regular Session meeting minutes 5. Audience comments 6. Administrator's report (25 minutes) a. Update on beach dune swale exotic removal project b. *Median cut — Gulf Park Drive c. Tree canopy/light pole conflicts d. December financial report 7. Committee reports (60 minutes) a. Clam Bay b. Landscape & Safety *In-house mulch generation ii. Replacing bahia sod at north end of the berm c. Water Management 8. Chairman's report (5 minutes) 9. Old business 10. New business 11. Adjournment *indicates possible action items ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN AGENDA ITEM WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER ITEM TO ADDRESS THE BOARD. THE BOARD WILL SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SUBJECTS NOT ON THIS AGENDA AND ANY PERSON WISHING TO SPEAK WILL RECEIVE UP TO THREE (3) MINUTES. THE BOARD ENCOURAGES YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS IN WRITING IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD IS MADE,WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS AN ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING YOU ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION AT (239) 597-1749 OR VISIT PELICANBAYSERVICESDIVISION.NET. 12/29/2016 1:06:09 PM PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BOARD REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 7, 2016 The Pelican Bay Services Division Board met on Wednesday, December 7, 2016, at 1:00 p.m. at the Community Center at Pelican Bay, 8960 Hammock Oak Drive,Naples, Florida 34108. In attendance were: Pelican Bay Services Division Board Bohdan Hirniak Ken Dawson, Chairman Susan O'Brien Scott Streckenbein, Vice-Chairman Peggy Pinterich (absent) Joe Chicurel Mike Shepherd Tom Cravens Dave Trecker Jacob Damouni (absent) Gary Ventress (absent) Pelican Bay Services Division Staff Mary McCaughtry, Operations Analyst Neil Dorrill, Administrator Lisa Jacob, Associate Project Manager Marion Bolick, Operations Manager Barbara Shea, Recording Secretary Also Present Jim Hoppensteadt, Pelican Bay Foundation Mary Johnson, Pelican Bay Foundation APPROVED AGENDA (AS PRESENTED) 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll call 3. Agenda approval 4. Approval of meeting minutes a. 11/02/16 Regular Session meeting b. 11/21/16 Special Session meeting 5. Audience comments 6. Optimizing landscaping work (25 minutes) 7. Beach renourishment update (5 minutes) 8. Administrator's report (30 minutes) a. Update on street lights b. Update on beach dune swale c. Update on Bay Colony exotic removal/Lake 5-12 d. Update on cul-de-sac renovations e. November financial report 9. Committee reports (20 minutes) a. Clam Bay b. Landscape & Safety c. Water Management 10. Chairman's report (5 minutes) 1 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session December 7, 2016 11. Old business 12. New business 13. Adjournment *indicates possible action items ROLL CALL Mr. Damouni, Ms. Pinterich, and Mr. Ventress were absent and a quorum was established AGENDA APPROVAL Mr. Cravens motioned, Dr. Trecker seconded to approve the agenda as presented. The motion carried unanimously. • APPROVAL OF 11/02/16 REGULAR SESSION MEETING MINUTES Mr. Cravens motioned, Mr. Streckenbein seconded to approve the 11/02/16 regular session meeting minutes as amended. The motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF 11/21/16 SPECIAL SESSION MEETING MINUTES Mr. Cravens motioned, Mr. Streckenbein seconded to approve the 11/21/16 regular session meeting minutes as amended. The motion carried unanimously. AUDIENCE COMMENTS None OPTIMIZING LANDSCAPING WORK Ms. O'Brien provided a summary of her observations of PBSD landscaping field workers and a copy of the Collier County HR policy on work hours. She commented on seeing improvement in field worker productivity and the general "look" of the community. Other board members echoed seeing evidence of improvement, and complemented Mr. Dorrill and Mr. Bolick for their leadership. Mr. Dorrill reassured the board that the PBSD management team has the same expectations and goals as the board. He summarized recent steps taken to improve worker productivity. Mr. Peter Duggan commented on several bollard lights on the Oakmont lake pathway not working. Mr. Hoppensteadt reported that new replacement lights have been ordered. BEACH RENOURISHMENT UPDATE Dr. Trecker reported that the beach renourishment project has been successfully completed, with the PBSD purchasing 9,200 cubic yards of sand at a cost of$400,000, deposited on the beach from marker R34'/2 to marker R36'/2. He provided photos of the project and commented on the high quality of quarry sand received. 2 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session December 7, 2016 ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT UPDATE ON STREET LIGHTS Mr. Dorrill reported that materials have been ordered for the street light project (on Laurel Oak Dr. and Ridgewood Dr. from US 41 to Pelican Bay Blvd.) which includes erecting three new poles and replacing all light fixtures with LED bulbs in this corridor. UPDATE ON BEACH DUNE SWALE AND BAY COLONY EXOTIC REMOVAL PROJECTS Mr. Dorrill reported that staff is in the process of soliciting proposals for both the first phase of the beach dune swale project and the Bay Colony exotic removal project. No permits will be required for either project. Proposals will be shared with the board when received. UPDATE ON CUL-DE-SAC RENOVATIONS Mr. Dorrill reported that the cul-de-sac renovation project has been successfully completed within budget. Positive feedback has been received from residents. NOVEMBER FINANCIAL REPORT Mr. Cravens motioned, Mr. Streckenbein seconded to accept the November financial report. The motion carried unanimously. COMMITTEE REPORTS CLAM BAY Ms. O'Brien provided a Clam Bay update; highlights included: (1) Turrell Hall's November report indicates the original mangrove die-off area remains steady at 111/2 acres; however, a new stressed area has been sighted just south of the Marker 36 restaurant which will continue to be monitored, (2) The next Clam Bay Committee meeting on Dec. 19 will focus on strategies for addressing the causes of the mangrove die-off, (3) The 2016 annual Clam Bay Report, due from consultants on Dec. 15, 2016, will be reviewed at the Dec. 19 committee meeting, (4) A group including Ms. O'Brien, Mr. Hoppensteadt and others from Pelican Bay attended the FWC Commission meeting in St. Petersburg on Nov. 16. Although the commissioners did not add Clam Bay as a Manatee Protection Zone, they directed FWC staff to continue to talk with PBF's attorney, (5) A new annual contract with Earth Tech for exotic removal has been executed which will be more cost effective and more focused in high need areas than in prior years. Mr. Peter Duggan commented on issues discussed at recent Mangrove Action Group meetings and Men's Coffee meetings. Mr. Dorrill commented on a very successful recent meeting with Commissioner-Elect Solis and Mr. Dawson where PBSD top priorities were discussed. LANDSCAPE & SAFETY REPORT 3 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session December 7,2016 Dr. Chicurel reported that the Landscape & Safety Committee will have a standing meeting on the third Tuesday of each month. The next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, Dec. 20. There was no L&S committee meeting held in November. WATER MANAGEMENT Mr. Cravens commented on the highlights of the November Water Management Committee: (1) The November 2016 CH2M Hill "Pelican Bay Stormwater Lakes Water Quality Monitoring Program: August 2016 Sampling Event Data Review" reports that there has been essentially no change in total nitrogen and total phosphorus in Pelican Bay lakes during the last five years. (2) Current lake sediment test data indicates: (a) 99.99% of lake copper is contained in the sediment, (b) soluble copper levels in Clam Bay remain low, (c) high levels of sediment phosphorus and steady levels of soluble phosphorus continue to fuel algae growth, (d) it appears that sediment dredging will not be needed for decades. (3) The Naples Grande front lake and the Club Clubhouse lake have been chosen for "Microfloc"testing; Ms. Jacob reported receiving a proposal for $10,029 for this project. (4) Updates of the two lakes stocked with blue tilapia in July 2016 were provided: (a) a photo displayed of the Ridgewood Park lake taken on Nov. 14 showed significant microcystis on the lake surface; a photo taken on Dec. 6 showed no microcystis or algae; (b) a photo displayed of the Community Center lake taken on Dec. 6 appeared algae-free. (5) Staff has requested an ABB proposal for an updated lake bank erosion study to include those lakes measured in 2014. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT Mr. Dawson commented on recent trends and the changing dynamics in Pelican Bay property sales data. OLD BUSINESS Dr. Trecker commented on the four residential openings and one commercial opening on the PBSD board in 2017. The deadline for applications is January 10, 2017. NEW BUSINESS Mr. Peter Duggan commented on quick response times by police, fire, and EMS to a recent personal medical emergency. Ms. Mary Johnson expressed her concerns regarding dodder vines on some of the Pelican Bay Blvd. trees. She also expressed concerns regarding the possibility of exotic invasive plants getting into any in-house produced mulch. Mr. Cravens commented on his recent sighting of a red-shouldered hawk perched on the recently installed osprey nesting platform south of Marker 36. No ospreys have been sighted on the nesting platform. Mr. Hoppensteadt asked for PBSD direction on suggested locations for bat boxes to be provided by Mr. Tim Hall. 4 Pelican Bay Services Division Board Regular Session December 7, 2016 ADJOURNMENT IThe meeting was adjourned at 2:06 p.m. Ken Dawson, Chairman Minutes approved [ 1 as presented OR [ 1 as amended ON [ 1 date 5 Vit`.. ' ,3,_‘i v , 0 ; Lb S(l t, E .. ,, ...,,r,„...t,111,,.....,,. .,--,-,,,,,,..,,,fry-:,,,i,,,i-...,z, ',-,'',.: 1 a s _ F 1. s ° a { w ,,i { I W I I '''' '''''',:.:44-41P ' '''‘71 'T ,I;4,,'-,L,--,'-',:,''.-.4-. li, - wil„,g 1 lit ', I s , a ' k ;r.,,,''','",,, # 4.0**,, - :, 1*:'''''''''' 1;;:1,1 , sem k} Agenda Item#6b-1 Page 1 of 3 C c Location Q1-2014 Q2-2014 Q3-2014 Q4-2014 tii F 523 Q Shadowlawn Dr south of Davis Blvd(SR 84) 5,035 4,565 3,876 4,409 649 0 South first St(CR 846)south of Main St(SR 29) 15,587 12,160 13,503 15,474 665 A SR 29 north of Fann Worker's Village 6,458 591 A SR 29 north of SR 82 6,665 615 A SR 29 north of Tamiami Trail(US 41/SR 90) 2,660 . 696 Q SR 29 south of Oil Well Road 3,813 3,079 2,787 3,524 661 A SR 82 west of SR 29 12,721 561 Q Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 45)south of Pine Ridge Rd(CR 896) 42,372 38,431 37,601 39,202 563 Q Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 45)south of Vanderbilt Bch Rd(CR 862) 51,118 44,645 42,114 45,951 572 Q Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 90)east of Rattlesnake Ham Rd(CR 864) 41,981 39,707 31,055 39,137 546 Q Tamiami Trail(US 41/SR 45)at Lee County Line 41,190 32,318 30,499 33,438 564 Q Tamiami Trail(US 41/SR 45)north of Immokalee Rd(CR 864) 60,647 43,129 39,343 54,005 562 Q Tamiami Trail(US 41/SR 45)north of Pine Ridge Rd(CR 896) 38,514 29,953 27,765 37,384 577 Q Tamiami Trail(US 41/SR 45)south of 99th Avenue North 55,231 35,307 34,528 52,444 604 Q Tamiami Trail(US 41/SR 90)east of Airport Rd(CR 31) 52,232 28,208 27,622 49,376 608 Q Tamiami Trail(US 41/SR 90)east of Collier Blvd(CR 951) 15,307 16,109 15,578 15,334 545 Q Tamiami Trail(US 41/SR 90)east of Davis Blvd(SR 84) 38,272 26,192 25,237 32,638 616 A Tamiami Trail(US 41/SR 90)east of SR29/CR 29 4,564 571 Q Tamiami Trail(US 41/SR 90)west of Collier Blvd(SR 951) 31,070 32,613 30,589 32,472 570 Q Tamiami Trail(US 41/SR 90)west of San Marco Rd(CR 92) 7,197 3,831 2,216 3,312 617 A Tamiami Trail(US 4I/SR 90)west of SR29/CR 29 5,030 698 Q Thomasson Dr.west of US 41 9,632 9,293 8,879 9,295 524 Q Vanderbilt Bch Rd(CR 862)west of Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 45) 20,733 16,045 15,657 18,649 646 Q Vanderbilt Beach Ext(CR 862)east of Pelican Ridge 33,623 27,826 23,305 28,051 579 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd(CR 862)east of Airport Rd(CR 31) 28,588 28,686 28,060 29,609 666 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd(CR 862)east of Goodlette Rd(CR 851) 36,367 29,537 28,329 35,650 630 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd(CR 862)east of Livingston Rd(CR 881) 35,215 34,298 32,643 34,067 668 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd(CR 862)east of Vineyards Blvd 29,311 24,971 25,081 28,596 580 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd(CR 862)west of Collier Blvd(CR 951) 19,147 19,652 19,297 20,154 667 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd(CR 862)west of Oakes Blvd 30,338 27,654 29,092 35,914 629 Q Vanderbilt Beach Road(CR 862)west of Livingston Road(CR 881) 34,012 29,719 27,343 32,363 578 Q Vanderbilt Dr(CR 901)north of l l lth Avenue North 10,756 6,767 6,012 8,429 633 Q Vanderbilt Dr(CR 901)north of Vanderbilt Bch Rd(CR 862) 7,126 4,947 4,553 5,584 548 Q Vanderbilt Dr(CR 901)north of Wiggins Pass Rd(CR 888) 11,668 6,619 5,858 8,187 632 Q Vanderbilt Dr(CR 901)south of 111th Ave N 6,019 4,022 3,698 4,641 640 A Vineyards Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) 8,057 611 Q Westclock Rd west of North 15th St(SR 29) 3,174 2,970 3,606 3,889 670 Q Wiggins Pass Rd(CR 888)east of Vanderbilt Dr(CR 901) 7,589 3,931 3,959 5,310 669 Q Wiggins Pass Rd(CR 888)west of Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 45) 10,919 6,570 6,152 8,725 680 Q Wilson Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd(CR 876) 5,994 6,031 5,807 6,056 676 Q Wilson Blvd north of Immokalee Rd(CR 846) 1,498 1,623 1,460 1,686 681 Q Wilson Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd(CR 876) 348 371 268 348 650 Q Wilson Blvd south of Immokalee Rd(CR 846) 6,280 5,809 5,289 6,146 'T: Type of Count A = Annual Count Stations Q =Quarterly Count Stations S = Semi-Annual Count Stations Construction(unable to get counts) Agenda Item#6b-1 Page 2 of 3 QTR 1 QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4 689 Q Radio Road (CR 856)west of Livingston Road (CR 881) 14,789 13,554 12,954 14,349 721 A Randall Blvd east of Everglades Blvd (Midway to Desoto Blvd) 1,876 0 651 Q Randall Blvd east of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 13,383 11,957 13,148 14,751 516 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) east of Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 21,449 22,604 14,639 16,735 518 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864)west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 13,219 10,279 8,145 10,151 517 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864)west of County Barn Rd 18,740 14,295 12,734 13,530 534 Q Rattlesnake Hammock Rd (CR 864) east of County Barn Rd 17,789 13,413 12,279 13,483 648 S Sanctuary Rd north of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 990 603 537 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 28,961 24,856 24,129 24,985 529 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Golden Gate Pkwy(CR 886) 22,919 19,952 19,653 20,658 606 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Radio Rd (CR 856) 29,519 27,139 22,252 26,168 702 Q Santa Barbara Blvd south of Davis Blvd 18,926 20,594 16,410 19,082 528 Q Santa Barbara Blvd south of Golden Gate Pkwy(CR 886) 39,424 38,955 36,945 34,760 511 Q Seagate Dr west of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) 18,831 18,697 17,866 15,879 720 S Shadowlawn Dr north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 3,311 2,469 523 Q Shadowlawn Dr south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 5,209 5,712 4,127 4,514 549 Q South First St (CR 846) south of Main St (SR 29) 17,520 13,445 15,312 15,432 665 A SR 29 north of Farm Worker's Village 5,563 591 A SR 29 north of SR 82 7,481 615 A SR 29 north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 2,686 696 Q SR 29 south of Oil Well Road 3,658 3,362 3,402 3,499 661 A SR 82 west of SR 29 15,548 561 Q Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 45) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 42,550 38,482 37,559 39,329 563 Q Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 45) south of Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 86; 51,238 44,946 42,227 46,072 572 Q Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 90) east of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 8 44,827 37,216 31,062 39,473 546 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) at Lee County Line 42,394 38,936 31,280 35,055 564 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) north of Immokalee Rd (CR 864) 60,843 44,505 40,181 54,145 562 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 38,761 31,149 30,929 37,509 577 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) south of 99th Avenue North 54,371 46,760 34,934 52,549 604 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 28,799 46,893 27,936 49,645 608 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 17,182 16,030 16,114 15,441 545 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 38,028 26,454 28,449 35,236 616 A Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of SR29/CR 29 4,402 571 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90)west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 34,874 32,666 30,649 32,590 570 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90)west of San Marco Rd (CR 92) 6,852 4,020 4,311 4,846 617 A Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90)west of SR29/CR 29 4,955 698 Q Thomasson Dr. west of US 41 9,925 9,342 8,871 9,427 524 Q Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 862)west of Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 45 24,392 14,876 13,391 19,102 646 Q Vanderbilt Beach Ext (CR 862) east of Pelican Ridge 35,977 27,010 26,249 32,768 579 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 31,829 28,661 27,973 29,391 666 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 38,554 30,947 28,007 35,698 630 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 35,054 34,026 32,804 33,882 668 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Vineyards Blvd 32,663 27,399 27,658 33,024 580 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862)west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 21,314 19,707 19,179 20,255 667 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862)west of Oakes Blvd 38,034 40,244 32,848 46,925 629 Q Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862)west of Livingston Road (CR 38,018 31,355 27,322 32,169 Agenda Item#6b-1 Page 3 of 3 QTR 1 516 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) east of Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 22,496 518 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864)west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 12,132 517 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864)west of County Barn Rd 18,845 534 Q Rattlesnake Hammock Rd (CR 864) east of County Barn Rd 18,083 648 S Sanctuary Rd north of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 874 537 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 29,379 529 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Golden Gate Pkwy(CR 886) 23,481 606 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Radio Rd (CR 856) 30,323 702 Q Santa Barbara Blvd south of Davis Blvd 22,639 528 Q Santa Barbara Blvd south of Golden Gate Pkwy(CR 886) 39,552 511 Q Seagate Dr west of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) 18,910 720 S Shadowlawn Dr north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 2,903 523 Q Shadowlawn Dr south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 5,340 549 Q South First St(CR 846) south of Main St(SR 29) 17,558 665 A SR 29 north of Farm Worker's Village 7,591 591 A SR 29 north of SR 82 7,815 615 A SR 29 north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 1,988 696 Q SR 29 south of Oil Well Road 4,217 661 A SR 82 west of SR 29 15,438 561 Q Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 45) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 42,944 563 Q Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 45) south of Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 86; 51,901 572 Q Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 90) east of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 8 44,923 546 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) at Lee County Line 42,662 564 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) north of Immokalee Rd (CR 864) 61,177 562 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 39,096 577 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) south of 99th Avenue North 54,737 604 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 53,629 608 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 15,446 545 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 30,240 616 A Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of SR29/CR 29 3,067 571 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90)west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 35,364 570 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90)west of San Marco Rd (CR 92) 7,144 617 A Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90)west of SR29/CR 29 3,073 698 Q Thomasson Dr. west of US 41 10,236 524 Q Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 862)west of Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 45 25,760 646 Q Vanderbilt Beach Ext(CR 862) east of Pelican Ridge 38,365 579 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 32,516 666 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 38,801 630 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 35,322 668 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862)east of Vineyards Blvd 35,410 580 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862)west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 21,579 667 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862)west of Oakes Blvd 41,453 629 Q Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862)west of Livingston Road (CR 38,527 578 Q Vanderbilt Dr(CR 901) north of 111th Avenue North 13,045 633 Q Vanderbilt Dr(CR 901) north of Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 862) 7,597 548 Q Vanderbilt Dr(CR 901) north of Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) 12,543 632 Q Vanderbilt Dr(CR 901) south of 111th Ave N 6,725 :'.-1'-'4' '1 rill V n3% cll.' ,� co ` r . = a 1 �- Jt ca 0 t` 4 ' 414 ' '4. -ti" 4i,l, ,',,,,,„t ''.- '"' &.1"4 *, t--. ' ° ,..: ' .1-,' ,. , ..'...,f') •:.),,,,,!„.,.' ,. .,''',.3:...,...t. ,N4 c4/,,,,,,„.t,_ 1 .1, ..,,÷,,,,, A ,,,,,,, ;t�'` a' Lt ° �' ` 'Is -,i.,,,,-..,: ';''''. .,:' ., ''',D tie. ' *. ' .,,,,,, ,,...,,,,,, .,, . .,...,.„,„„ .„... ..,...,,,,,, ,,,..c.,,,,....., : , , _ '-..,,,,., ., .,„it:', 1 '., u•-•!- v, 4::, ,..,L t,"' .., ,,,,,,- 4E 4bt. ,,,,,,.,,,,,..*',.,iir.," 4.. '' : ,''.-i /- �; � ,tio)ft mak. 4;:44/,. • a .'... .. , 1 ,'k.k." 4,,,, ,'.., ---,,,„ ,...4- ‘, , ,;,44„,,, 114.c T " ''. 4 ,f '1" , '--,'',44,'';:` ,' 0-i", - : ,. _.,,,,. ,.. ,,,,,,,, ,,, 44t„, '' ' '' ' - ' ' '' .1 \ - ' 4 >> 1 '''" 41147ils''''' ' ° ' i., . ,,:,....:„,,,,,,,, , , ., ''.:4%,4';',Lf"" ° .4'''. l'"' ' '''': I; :' ' , ';".. ,L ,;.„ts,..4' ,• -6, ,,i2.-!--, .. ..,,,,,, .', -'.--r'.,., - , *, ,., . v.\- \ - - , ,-,-.ti4 k; \-. - ;444#N ,, ... ,. ',, ,-,,,,,,„ , , ;'1 4 , N -1 H OO O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,O o O O U o 0 0 0 0 0 d � o 00 0 d 0 0 °` a O 7 M O O O O O '4 00 N 00 o O O M O O O O O OL5 O Man 00 v1 O O F" 00 609 al a 0 6R v9 6NR 00 b04 6 b9 E6 0 7 0 H J Q H 0 H H c/ ~ O o o o O O O O o p p0 p O O O LU U o 0 o O H O O O O O O ON o ON O O O ti Vl M N 7 N 0 N 00 E 00 0 M 00 Et z 69 69 69 69 00 b4 69 69 00 a L 0 d C) L C CC H C O L F- H M a, 7 oo 0 Q N N N Oa L rX 4 CI) Z O (/) OO n V o g V7 - U - V] } c, >- >- w U] V] OW _ L.L. a s _] a a 0 a 0 v, , a a a x N O w d 0 O O Z a a O O H• Cr Z Ili 0• J o aL a O t-- O a. Q a pe R¢ - V U c� ._ W d O W 1.1 0 Ca + U O L4 p4 w .. a, 'o W w. U yH o Z w n U H C7 F- cA w W w `c H O O C7 W d W O t ] H C7 El .r F a: O F- O 'n C7 v W W p z , N C O Q o W4 c E z 0 W p4 W 0 p. U ',j W >^ c F3 O Z a Z O Z d d d U w [] U O H w I- 9 H C7 v ,- 0 .a > W 0. Q W b N U H > O O z O1 n W z U >a>. a Z Z Z Z v 2 o 0 .a W W d W X H O OU a OU 'Z d o 2 U cC a: 2 a! W U) TZ co O Y z N M V v-, ‘.0 l- co N. M. V W co d v N H 3 O a CD d ~ °e �Ia g. Y UI,11 w ® !Ii I LL u r i. ^ G8�.'Jt32b30k�.., a H ' n- w'',■ I o m , !' I El Z ` i \ /, ♦ ,- i CO a J V Z 4s Ax dw3 3 v' ao i `i._ . -\\_\ E! . ...,,, 1 ,Tg34'!e I „,,,o i . A` f, /ri,:\;\, i , \ '1-1, :t 9 %\ iik,-J4.e, i `Iti I____-1A i / 1IoW � t ' ,. v ;a I a a I € a�\Q, y \ -0-21:i' ,);,-----\ s 0 p , Sy 1 1 d - .i -3 4 „ W , . 90 ' 6 ',,g-)" \\ t C \ °W`®a (;) ++ a ci 05:.i04. 4 il ,i ' .. \\__ c V''‘'/ 0 Q 1 7 r ' r��q al / L ' yv. ' v d I �__ , '\ v ' , i ,:,),..,,,\0_,--a---g , d 1 0 r I s @ �, J t © S' o N t Is 1 Agenda Item #bc Page 2 of 2 Send all Invoices to: Collier County Board of County Commissioners 01,1.4 f, Collier County Board of County Commissioners Procurement Services Division c.- ,r r,+ Attn:Accounts Payable Phone:239-252-8407 (" 3299 Tamiami Trl E Ste 700 Fax: 239-732-0844n „�,, . .. Naples FL 34112-5749 Tax Exempt:85-8015966531C-1 -r'ur:' OR email to:bccapclerk@collierclerk.com Purchase Order number must appear on all related correspondence,shipping papers and invoices: Vendor# 101823 Purchase order LEO JR LAWN&IRRIGATION SERVICES INC Po Number 4500171396 Dale 10/04/2016 3553 PLOVER AVE NAPLES FL 34117 Contact Person Pelican Bay Div Telephone 239-597-1749 Fax 239-597-1749 Please deliver to: PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION Delivery Date: 801 LAUREL OAK DR, STE 302 NAPLES FL 34108 Terms of Payment Net 30 Days Item Material Description Order Qty Unit Price Per Unit Net Value 00010 Trim Sabal Palms 3,200 EA 27.50 18,000.00 Approximately 3,200 trees,final count will be made. Total quantity spread over the following delivery dates: Quantity Unit Delivery Date 3,200each Day 01/31/2017 00020 Dodder vine removal 12 EA 2,150.00 25,800.00 (12 days) " Item completely delivered *** 00030 Lift and thin Oaks 18 EA 2,350.00 42,300.00 (18 days) Approximately 10 days of work. Total quantity spread over the following delivery dates: Quantity Unit Delivery Date 18each Day 01/31/2017 Total net value excl.tax USD 156,100.00 VENDOR Terms and Conditions The VENDOR agrees to comply with all Purchase Order Terms and Conditions as outlined on the Collier County Procurement Services Division site: http://purchasing.colliergov.net/Purchasing%20Policy/Forms/Allltems.aspx,including delivery and payment terms.Further the VENDOR agrees to: 1. Provide goods and services outlined in this Purchase Order with the prices,terms,delivery method and specifications listed above. 2. Notify department Immediately if order fulfillment cannot occur as specified. 3. Send all invoices to: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Attn:Accounts Payable 3299 Tamiami Trl E Ste 700 Naples FL 34112-5749 OR email to:bccapclerk@collierclerk.com The Purchase Order is authorized under direction of Collier County Board of County Commissioners by: j. ,f'a?C'`, .-./� Edward F.Coyman Jr,Director,Procurement Services Division Printed 12/29/2016 it 16:31:41 109-182001-646319 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item#6d Page 1 of 15 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-December 31,2016 Operating Fund 109-FY 2017 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 3,541,948.83 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles&Equipment 758,594.67 Due from Property Appraiser - Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 4,300,543.50 Total Assets $ 4,300,543.50 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 25,195.53 Accrued Wages Payable - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 92,769.57 Total Liabilities $ 117,965.10 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved $ 907,381.04 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 3,275,197.36 Total Fund Balance $ 4,182,578.40 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 4,300,543.50 Agenda Item#6d Page 2 of 15 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-December 31,2016 Operating Fund 109-FY 2017 (Unaudited) Annual YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carryforward $ 608,800.00 $ 608,800.00 $ 608,800.00 $ - Special Assessment-Water Management Admin 1,009,100.00 807,300.00 842,070.40 34,770.40 Special Assessment-Right of Way Beautification 2,941,100.00 2,352,900.00 2,454,033.72 101,133.72 Plan Review Fees 1,500.00 - - Miscellaneous(Surplus Sales,Ins.Refunds) - - - - Revenue Reserve(est.5%) (107,900.00) - - - Interest 6,300.00 1,050.00 751.44 (298.56) Total Operating Revenues $ 4,368,900.00 $ 3,770,050.00 $ 3,905,655.56 $ 135,605.56 Operating Expenditures: Water Management Administration Payroll Expense $ 75,000.00 $ 14,100.00 $ 11,610.71 $ 2,489.29 Emergency Maintenace and Repairs 3,500.00 - - - IT Direct Capital 1,100.00 - - - IT Office Automation/Billing Hr. 5,300.00 - - - Indirect Cost Reimbursement 104,900.00 52,500.00 52,450.00 50.00 Inter Payment/Mnt.Site Ins. Assessment 13,600.00 3,400.00 3,400.00 - Other Contractural Services 51,500.00 12,900.00 9,959.00 2,941.00 Telephone 5,200.00 1,300.00 698.79 601.21 Postage and Freight 1,200.00 - - Rent Buildings and Equipment 13,700.00 4,600.00 4,086.00 514.00 Insurance-General 2,200.00 - - - Printing,Binding and Copying 1,800.00 - - - Clerk's Recording Fees 1,000.00 - - - Legal Advertising 1,000.00 - - - Other Office and Operating Supplies 1,500.00 400.00 487.15 (87.15) Training and Education(Tuition Reimb.) 1,500.00 300.00 275.17 24.83 Total Water Management Admin Operating $ 284,000.00 $ 89,500.00 $ 82,966.82 $ 6,533.18 Water Management Field Operations Payroll Expense $ 145,500.00 $ 28,000.00 $ 23,322.33 $ 4,677.67 Engineering Fees 60,000.00 9,300.00 9,845.00 (545.00) IT Office Automation 700.00 - - Flood Control Berm and Swale Mntc. 66,000.00 3,000.00 1,870.00 1,130.00 Flood Control Replanting Littorals 8,500.00 - - - Flood Control Water Quality Testing Supplies 1,500.00 - - Interdepartmental Payment(Water Quality Lab) 17,700.00 4,400.00 5,252.83 (852.83) Plan Review Charges 1,500.00 - - - Other Contractural Services 8,300.00 2,900.00 5,338.41 (2,438.41) Temporary Labor 77,800.00 19,500.00 15,335.96 4,164.04 Cell Phones 1,300.00 300.00 362.16 (62.16) Trash and Garbage 5,900.00 1,800.00 1,530.42 269.58 Motor Pool Rental Charge 100.00 - - - Insurance-General 2,500.00 - - - Insurance-Auto 1,000.00 - - - Building Repairs&Mntc. 500.00 75.00 68.34 6.66 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 10,300.00 1,700.00 1,25734 442.26 Fuel and Lubricants 2,300.00 400.00 291.68 108.32 Tree Triming 121,800.00 - - - Page 1 of 3 Agenda Item#6d Page 3 of 15 Clothing and Uniforms 1,600.00 900.00 803.18 96.82 Personal Safety Equipment 800.00 100.00 - 100.00 Fertilizer and Herbicides 100,500.00 10,900.00 8,025.60 2,874.40 Other Repairs and Maintenance 1,500.00 300.00 233.27 66.73 Other Operating Supplies and Equipment 2,500.00 800.00 1,202.22 (402.22) Total Water Management Field Operating $ 640,100.00 $ 84,375.00 $ 74,739.14 $ 9,635.86 Right of Way Beautification-Administration Payroll Expense $ 76,500.00 $ 14,400.00 $ 11,962.23 $ 2,437.77 Emergency Repairs and Maintenance 4,500.00 200.00 25.00 175.00 IT Capital - - - - Office Automation 500.00 - - - Other Contractural Services 52,400.00 13,100.00 9,715.16 3,384.84 Telephone 5,200.00 1,300.00 701.79 598.21 Postage 2,000.00 - - - Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 15,000.00 5,000.00 4,323.95 676.05 Insurance-General 500.00 - - - Printing,Binding and Copying 2,300.00 - - - Clerk's Recording 1,200.00 - - - Legal Advertising 1,200.00 - - - Office Supplies General 2,000.00 300.00 259.20 40.80 Training and Education(Tuition Reimb.) 8,500.00 700.00 312.50 387.50 Total Right of Way Beautification Admin Operating $ 171,800.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 27,299.83 $ 7,700.17 Right of Way Beautification-Field Operations Payroll Expense $ 1,032,600.00 $ 162,800.00 $ 147,451.39 $ 15,348.61 IT Capital&Office Automation 16,200.00 - Emergency Maintenance and Repairs 3,300.00 - - - Recycled Water Use 110,000.00 25,000.00 25,495.75 (495.75) Pest Control 1,000.00 - - - Landscape Incidentals 2,500.00 200.00 199.99 0.01 Other Contractural Services 31,100.00 13,800.00 13,014.88 785.12 Temporary Labor 562,300.00 94,200.00 89,122.73 5,077.27 Cellular Telephone 5,800.00 1,500.00 1,017.34 482.66 Electricity 4,000.00 1,000.00 2,742.77 (1,74237) Trash and Garbage 17,700.00 5,200.00 4,895.86 304.14 Cable TV/Internet 1,200.00 - - - Rent Equipment 5,000.00 800.00 330.48 469.52 Insurance-General 8,800.00 - - - Insurance-Auto 10,100.00 - - - Insurance Claims Paid - - 430.44 (430.44) Building Repairs and Maintenance 500.00 100.00 74.29 25.71 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 42,600.00 7,100.00 8,517.99 (1,417.99) Fuel and Lubricants 33,300.00 5,600.00 4,851.22 748.78 Licenses,Permits,Training 1,700.00 - - - Tree Triming 181,000.00 40,700.00 37,825.00 2,875.00 Clothing and Uniforms 12,000.00 2,600.00 1,854.49 745.51 Personal Safety Equipment 5,000.00 800.00 749.21 50.79 Fertilizer and Herbicides 80,000.00 36,400.00 39,800.39 (3,400.39) Landscape Maintenance/Mulch 75,000.00 20,300.00 18,314.10 1,985.90 Landscape Materials 73,200.00 23,000.00 25,883.60 (2,883.60) Road/Pathway Repairs(Sharrows) 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,394.00 (394.00) Sprinkler Maintenance 25,000.00 6,800.00 7,617.10 (817.10) Painting Supplies 500.00 - - - Traffic Signs 10,000.00 2,100.00 1,030.00 1,070.00 Minor Operating Equipment 12,000.00 5,000.00 5,400.65 (400.65) Other Operating Supplies 11,000.00 2,800.00 2,568.79 231.21 Page 2 of 3 Agenda Item#6d Page 4 of 15 Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Operating $ 2,376,400.00 $ 459,800.00 $ 441,582.46 $ 18,217.54 Total Operating Expenditures $ 3,472,300.00 $ 668,675.00 $ 626,588.25 $ 42,086.75 Capital Expenditures: Water Management Operations Other Machinery and Equipment-Field $ 17,000.00 $ 5,950.00 $ 5,885.25 $ 64.75 General-Admin 1,000.00 - - - Total Water Management Field Operations Capital $ 18,000.00 $ 5,950.00 $ 5,885.25 $ 64.75 Right of Way Beautification Autos and Trucks $ - - $ - $ - Other Machinery and Equipment 89,000.00 31,150.00 27,955.77 $ 3,194.23 General-Admin 1,000.00 - - $ - Total Right of Way Beautification-Field Capital $ 90,000.00 $ 31,150.00 $ 27,955.77 $ 3,194.23 Total Capital Expenditures $ 108,000.00 $ 37,100.00 $ 33,841.02 $ 3,258.98 Total Operating Expenditures $ 3,580,300.00 $ 705,775.00 $ 660,429.27 $ 45,345.73 Non-Operating Expenditures: Transfer to Fund 322 $ - $ - $ - $ - Tax Collector Fees 98,800.00 69,160.00 65,922.09 3,237.91 Property Appraiser Fees 60,000.00 52,500.00 52,004.97 495.03 Reserves(2 1/2 months for Contingencies) 432,700.00 - - - Reserves for Capital 217,900.00 - - - Reserved for Attrition (20,800.00) - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 788,600.00 $ 121,660.00 $ 117,927.06 $ 3,732.94 Total Expenditures $ 4,368,900.00 $ 827,435.00 $ 778,356.33 $ 49,078.67 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 2,942,615.00 $ 3,127,299.23 $ 184,684.23 Page 3 of 3 Agenda Item#6d Page 5 of 15 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-December 31,2016 Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2017 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 1,514,113.36 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles&Equipment 19,181.75 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 1,533,295.11 Total Assets $ 1,533,295.11 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ 1,376.84 Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 2,454.01 Accrued Wages Payable - Total Liabilities $ 3,830.85 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved $ 1,146,299.39 Excess Revenue(Expenditures) 383,164.87 Total Fund Balance $ 1,529,464.26 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 1,533,295.11 Agenda Item#6d Page 6 of 15 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-December 31,2016 Street Lighting Fund 778-FY 2017 (Unaudited) Annual YT[) YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carryforward $ 1,119,300.00 $ 1,119,300.00 $ 1,119,300.00 $ - Curent Ad Valorem Tax 535,300.00 428,200.00 445,045.17 16,845.17 - - Transfer from Tax Collector - - Miscellaneous (i.e. Ins. Refunds, surplus, eti - - - - Revenue Reserve (est.5%) (26,900.00) - - - Interest 2,500.00 625.00 755.01 130.01 Total Operating Revenues $ 1,630,200.00 $ 1,548,125.00 $ 1,565,100.18 $ 16,975.18 Operating Expenditures: Street Lighting Administration Payroll Expense $ 75,700.00 $ 14,200.00 $ 11,610.84 $ 2,589.16 Indirect Cost& IT Automation . 8,300.00 3,900.00 3,900.00 - Other Contractural Services 33,700.00 9,800.00 9,678.00 122.00 Telephone 5,200.00 1,300.00 511.73 788.27 Postage and Freight 1,500.00 - - - Rent Buildings/Equipment/Storage 14,500.00 4,800.00 4,179.84 620.16 Insurance-General 400.00 - - - Printing, Binding and Copying - - - - Office Supplies General 800.00 200.00 108.43 91.57 Tuition Reimbursement - - - - Other Operating Supplies 1,000.00 - - - Total Street Lighting Admin Operating $ 141,100.00 $ 34,200.00 $ 29,988.84 $ 4,211.16 Street Lighting Field Operations Payroll Expense $ 69,400.00 $ 13,700.00 $ 11,242.78 $ 2,457.22 Enginnering Fees 10,000.00 8,500.00 8,872.00 (372.00) IT Office Automation 300.00 - - Emergency Maintenance & Repairs 9,600.00 1,900.00 1,984.84 (84.84) Other Contractual Services 800.00 200.00 113.41 86.59 Temporary Labor 42,400.00 10,600.00 7,009.30 3,590.70 Cellular Telephone 1,100.00 300.00 362.16 (62.16) Electricity 30,000.00 7,500.00 4,854.36 2,645.64 Insurance-General 1,000.00 - - - Insurance Auto 1,000.00 - - - Building Maintenace & Repairs 500.00 50.00 35.00 15.00 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item#6d Page 7 of 15 Fleet Maintenance and Parts 5,400.00 900.00 300.00 600.00 , Fuel and Lubricants 700.00 100.00 76.55 23.45 Other Equipment Repairs/Supplies 500.00 - - - Personal Safety Equipment 800.00 200.00 106.08 93.92 Electrical Contractors 16,400.00 2,733.33 2,231.13 502.20 Light Bulb Ballast 16,800.00 4,200.00 3,895.46 304.54 Total Street Lighting Field Operating $ 206,700.00 $ 50,883.33 $ 41,083.07 $ 9,800.26 Total Street Lighting Expenditures $ 347,800.00 $ 85,083.33 $ 71,071.91 $ 14,011.42 Capital Expenditures: Street Lighting Operations Other Machinery/Equipment $ - $ - $ - $ - General Improvements-Admin 1,000.00 - - - Total Capital Expenditures $ 1,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Total Operating Expenditures $ 348,800,00 $ 85,083.33 $ 71,071.91 $ 14,011.42 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 14,000.00 $ 9,100.00 $ 8,943.75 $ 156.25 Property Appraiser Fees 7,500.00 $ - - - Reserve for Future Construction 1,000,000.00 - - - Reserves(2 1/2 mos.for Contingencies) 124,700.00 - - - I Reserves for Capital 135,200.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 1,281,400.00 $ 9,100.00 $ 8,943.75 $ 156.25 Total Expenditures $ 1,630,200.00 $ 94,183.33 $ 80,015.66 $ 14,167.67 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 1,453,941.67 $ 1,485,084.52 $ 31,142.85 Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item#6d Page 8 of 15 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-December 31,2016 Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2017 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 1,554,451.16 Interest Receivable Improvements,Vehicles&Equipment 2,295,527.73 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 3,849,978.89 Total Assets $ 3,849,978.89 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ - Goods Received Inv. Received 10,812.50 Total Liabilities $ 10,812.50 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved $ 1,291,916.45 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 2,547,249.94 Total Fund Balance $ 3,839,166.39 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 3,849,978.89 Agenda Item#6d Page 9 of 15 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-December 31,2016 Capital Projects Fund 322-FY 2017 (Unaudited) Adopted Amended YTD YTD Budget Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward $1,280,442.46 $ 1,280,442.46 $ 1,280,442.46 $ 1,280,442.46 $ - Transfer from Fund 109 General - - - - - Miscellaneous - - - - - Special Assessment 428,100.00 428,100.00 342,500.00 357,12.8.06 14,628.06 Transfer from Tax Collector - - - - Revenue Reserve (est. 5%) (21,400.00) (21,400.00) - - Interest 5,000.00 5,000.00 800.00 417.97 (382.03) Total Operating Revenues $ 1,692,142.46 $1,692,142.46 $ 1,623,742.46 $1,637,988.49 $ 14,246.03 Operating Expenditures: Irrigation& Landscaping Landscape Imp. Project(50066) Engineering Fees $ - $ 42,729.82 $ - $ - $ - Other Contractural Services - 311,282.02 15,564.10 11,739.51 3,824.59 Rent Equipment - 1,900.00 1,900.00 2,645.00 (745.00) Sprinkler System Repairs - - - 2,777.09 (2,777.09) Landscape Materials 175,000.00 232,210.50 46,400.00 44,914.45 1,485.55 Other Operating Supplies - 3,489.25 900.00 791.50 108.50 Sign Restoration Project(50103) Traffic Signs - 36,952.00 - - - Lake Aeration (50108) Improvements 100,000.00 117,522.77 17,600.00 15,307.00 2,293.00 Field Site Improvements (50143) - Improvements 64,100.00 64,100.00 1,923.00 1,880.00 43.00 Beach Renourishment(50126) Other Contractural Services 200,000.00 600,000.00 - - - Lake Bank Project(51026) Swale & Slope Maintenance 406.17 - - - Engineering Fees 72,736.31 - - - Landscape Materials 178.00 - - - Other Contractural Services 75,000.00 56,316.24 - - - Upgrade Irrigation System (51145) - Improvements 116,000.00 135,619.38 27,100.00 24,381.53 2,718.47 Total Project Expenditures $ 730,100.00 $1,675,442.46 $ 111,387.10 $ 104,436.08 $ 6,951.02 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item#6d Page 10 of 15 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 10,700.00 $ 10,700.00 $ 9,100.00 $ 7,142.56 $ 1,957.44 Property Appraiser Fees 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 5,522.04 477.96 Roiled Project Funds 945,342.46 - - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures: $ 962,042.46 $ 16,700.00 $ 15,100.00 $ 12,664.60 $ 2,435.40 Total Expenditures $1,692,142.46 $1,692,142.46 $ 126,487.10 $ 117,100.68 $ 9,386.42 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ - $1,497,255.36 $1,520,887.81 $ 23,632.45 Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item#6d Page 11 of 15 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Balance Sheet-December 31, 2016 Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2017 (Unaudited) Assets Current Assets Cash and Investments $ 208,573.34 Interest Receivable - Improvements,Vehicles& Equipment 234,767.01 Due from Tax Collector - Total Current Assets $ 443,340.35 Total Assets $ 443,340.35 Liabilities and Fund Balance Current Liabilities Accounts/Trade Payable $ - Goods Received/Inventory Recv'd 6,353.75 Accrued Wages Payable - Total Liabilities $ 6,353.75 Fund Balance Fund Balance-unreserved $ 113,012.86 Excess Revenues(Expenditures) 323,973.74 Total Fund Balance $ 436,986.60 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $ 443,340.35 Agenda Item#6d Page 12 of 15 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-December 31,2016 Clam Bay Fund 320-FY 2017 (Unaudited) Adopted Amended YTD YTD Budget Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Carry Forward $ 97,579.20 $ 97,579.20 $ 97,579.20 $ 97,579.20 $ - Special Assessment 126,900.00 126,900.00 101,500.00 106,010.64 4,510.64 Transfer from Tax Collector - - - - Miscellaneous Income - - 46.00 46.00 Revenue Reserve(est. 5%) (6,400.00) (6,400.00) - - - Interest 500.00 500.00 100.00 30.61 (69.39) Total Operating Revenues $ 218,579.20 $ 218,579.20 $ 199,179.20 $ 203,666.45 $ 4,487.25 Operating Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Engineering Fees $ 55,000.00 $ 76,657.93 $ 1,900.00 $ 1,220.00 $ 680.00 Other Contractural Services 13,000.00 19,966.89 $ 6,000.00 5,133.75 866.25 Tree Trimming 38,000.00 43,390.00 $ - - - Other Equipment Repairs 500.00 1,577.77 $ - - - Aerial Photography 7,500.00 25,698.60 $ 7,100.00 6,590.00 510.00 Minor Operating 500.00 9,688.01 $ - - - Other Operating Supplies 2,000.00 $ - - - Total Clam Bay Restoration $ 114,500.00 $ 178,979.20 15,000.00 $ 12,943.75 $ 2,056.25 Clam Bay Ecosystem Engineering Fees $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Licenses and Permits - - - - - Other Contractual Services - - - - - Total Clam Bay Ecosystem $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Capital Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Other Machinery and Equipment $ - $ 11,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Total Capital Expenditures $ - $ 11,000.00 $ - $ - $ - Total Operating Expenditures $ 114,500.00 $ 189,979.20 $ 15,000.00 $ 12,943.75 $ 2,056.25 Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item#6d Page 13 of 15 Non-Operating Expenditures: Tax Collector Fees $ 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 2,470.00 $ 2,120.21 $ 349.79 Property Appraiser Fees 2,700.00 2,700.00 1,755.00 1,639.17 115.83 Rolled Project Funds 75,479.20 - - - - Reserves for Contingencies 22,100.00 22,100.00 - - - Total Non-Operating Expenditures $ 104,079.20 $ 28,600.00 $ 4,225.00 $ 3,759.38 $ 465.62 Total Clam Bay Expenditures $ 218,579.20 $ 218,579.20 $ 19,225.00 $ 16,703.13 $ 2,521.87 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ - $ 179,954.20 $ 186,963.32 $ 7,009.12 Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item#6d Page 14 of 15 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-December 31,2016 Clam Bay Ecosystem Fund 111-FY 2017 (Unaudited) Adopted YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Fund 111 Distribution $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ - Total Operating Revenues $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ - Operating Expenditures: Clam Bay Ecosystem Engineering Fees $ - $ - $ - $ - I Other Contractural Services 150,000.00 $ 30,000.00 26,840.04 3,159.96 Total Clam Bay Dreging $ 150,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 26,840.04 $ 3,159.96 Capital Expenditures: Clam Bay Restoration Improvements General $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Capital Expenditures $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Clam Bay Operating Expenditures $ 150,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 26,840.04 $ 3,159.96 Net Profit/(Loss) $ - $ 120,000.00 $ 123,159.96 $ 3,159.96 Agenda Item#6d Page 15 of 15 Pelican Bay Services Municipal Services Taxing Unit Income Statement w/Budget-December 31,2016 Clam Pass Dredging Fund 195/88032.1-FY 2017 (Unaudited) Adopted Amended YTD YTD Budget Budget Budget Actual Variance Operating Revenues: Fund 195 Distribution $ $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Operating Revenues $ - $ - $ - $ - Operating Expenditures: Clam Pass Dredging(88032) Engineering Fees $ 20,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - General Improvements - - - - Total Clam Pass Dredging $ 20,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - Pelican Bay Beach (90070) Improvements General $1,250,000.00 $ 1,293,029.27 $ - $ - $ - Total Capital Expenditures $ 1,250,000.00 $ 1,293,029.27 $ - $ - $ - Total Clam Bay Expenditures $ 1,270,000.00 $ 1,293,029.27 $ - $ - $ - II 1t Agenda Item#7a Page 1 of 1 Clam Bay Update-January 2017 Mangrove die-off. Tim Hall's December report is included. Based on Tim's exploration of the standing water in the die-off area, he recommended having a survey completed to determine the ground elevations through the die-off area from the retaining wall at Bay Colony Drive out to the Bay. Agnoli, Barber& Brundage found during its site visit that some of the storm boxes along the east side of the retaining wall adjacent to Bay Colony Drive are full of sand and recommended that these be cleaned by their owners. Earth Tech's annual report noted mangrove mortality and stress in six mangrove plots that are not currently included in the identified die-off area. Additional monitoring of selected mangrove plots in the die-off area will be done in six months to provide updated data on the die-off. Earth Tech also noted in its report that water levels at all three wells have been above the ground nearly continuously since July 2016. An update on the die-off will be provided at a future PBSD Board meeting, possibly in February or March. Tidal ratio data. Humiston & Moore's latest report is included. Clam Bay monitoring. Earth Tech's annual Clam Bay report and Humiston & Moore's annual physical and tidal monitoring report were reviewed at the Clam Bay Committee meeting on December 19, 2016. PBSD board members will have an opportunity to ask questions about these reports at the January Board meeting. The annual water quality report is expected in mid January. The renewal of contracts for Clam Bay monitoring are expected to be initiated soon. Copper. The latest table is included. The October results for all nine sampling sites in Clam Bay met FDEP criteria. For the nine sampling sites for January-October 2016, 80 of the 90 copper results met FDEP criteria. Manatee Protection Zone. Included is an article requested by Jim Hoppensteadt for the mid January PB Post. The next step in FWC's rule-making process is a hearing to be held in Collier County in late January 2017. Prepared by Susan O'Brien December 29, 2016 Agenda Item#7a-1 Page 1 of 12 TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. ` MARINE & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 3584 Exchange Avenue, Suite B • Naples, Florida 34104-3732 • (239) 643-0166 • Fax(239) 643-6632 MEMORANDUM TO: PBSD Clam Bay Committee c/o Neil Dorrill FROM: Tim Hall DATE: December 16,2016 RE: Status report on flushing channels in Upper Clam Bay At the request of the Committee,we have undertaken a review of the flushing channels within the die-off area in an attempt to answer several questions that were posed to us at the November Committee meeting. Specifically; - Why is standing water still present along the Strand wall following a month of no rain? - Which channels are still effective and are there any that are no longer working as designed? - Will digging more channels address standing water still being observed along the Strand wall or elsewhere in die-off area? As we started on this investigation I first wanted to see if the area as a whole was responding in sync with the tidal information the Board has been gathering via the new tide stations. I looked at the past 6 months of tide data from Upper Clam Bay and compared that to the water level logger that EarthTech had installed in the mangroves of Upper Clam Bay. Exhibit 1 attached to this memo is the tidal data for Upper Clam Bay. Exhibit 2 is the water level data from the EarthTech logger place din the mangroves. I noticed spikes in the tidal data on September 1,October 18, and November 15. These spikes corresponded almost exactly with spikes in the water logger data from inside the mangrove system. The September 1 data intrigued me because of how much higher the water levels were at that time compared to the rest of the time period. I didn't think that was the result of tidal flow only. A little more research into the ambient weather that day showed me that On September 1 and 2 we had winds over 20 mph and gusting up to almost 40 mph from the south(See Exhibit 3 weather data from 9/1),which was pushing all that extra water up into Upper Clam Bay. The good news is that the system recovered back to normal water levels almost immediately after the winds dropped in intensity and shifted to a different direction. Based on this data, I believe that the connectivity of the mangrove system to the Bay through the flushing channels is still good and water flow is happening as it was designed. Question 1: Why is standing water still present along the Strand wall following a month of no rain? We also went into the field and investigated the individual channels that allow the flow from the wall to move east through the mangroves out to the Bay. It is clear from these investigations that water is flowing from the wall but that there are pockets of lower areas where water is pooling. I believe that this is a result of lower ground elevations and not blockages in the channels. The below photographs show a couple of different areas along the wall where this elevation difference can be seen. Agenda I #7a-1 tem Pa.e2of12 k.+ `- " 4'�� jf. ' K it k M # w .,. ' �� - , .,:,_ *.,--..4:.,-,.,.. ', y. .114 , ,,,,,, > a. ' ' .. The above photograph shows standing water along the wall but not in the mangroves adjacent. Also shown is the flushing cut which does appear to be working as intended and helps to drain the water away. Areas along the wall are simply at lower elevations where the water cannot drain completely away except at very low tide levels. Agenda Item#7a-1 Pa e3of12 ,..: ' , , 'killer K**,,,,,,tvig4.7* b„. i • �~.1��+ +moi ` �'!+! r+f'' j. ! i MIM_,... !�! J ,.. j s4. :y * [ �`� "k j: '1*4;;•• 411 ti jr iii /444' 0'4 0 ' -.ft „,,,,:-.5,,11- : '-. ,,,,,,, )1, :,t , .1 ° i E 4tkopvt - ” N. ,.,r.,' *- - - Aff ,f if " -- t k e This photograph shows a small pocket of water along the wall but also shows quite a few small mangrove seedlings sprouting throughout the area. These seedlings would not survive if the area was constantly inundated. Agenda Item#7a-1 Page 4 of 12 Question 2: Which channels are still effective and are there any that are no longer working as designed? All of the channels that we have investigated to date were still working. Some exhibited slower flow that others but all were passing water. We have begun calculating small issues that may become larger blockages over time and will be working on triaging these so that maintenance efforts in the coming year can be best spent on areas of greatest concern. The photos that follow depict some of the minor issues that we see arising and that will need maintenance over time. There have been no catastrophic blockages or failures in the channels that would preclude them from working as designed documented as of this time. . , • ,t -.�.Q/ a � 4 ., ',� '—'14 �,"r � i.,,. .a Viaw '.. �` „ `« �. jry I ` h ,3 f 1 I M , u pE tT • w , Afirt:) ,L.,. ., - Y,,, . . i ____.—. , /...cf . -„ ,- - 1, is ;„ .yi ;- This photo shows one of the channel mouths up against the wall with a partial blockage caused by a leaning tree. This was not blocking flow at this time but could do so if the tree falls completely over. Agenda Item#7a-1 Pa e5of12 r , ,,,,,,,,,,w. , * *f.' ,-** % N . ' -, --Ili -4";6"., , . ,„, � I' - .,....„ ,.,....._. ,.,.. ,....,,,,,,...... , ,,,, ...F..,, !. p___. , .„,,„,. 1... ..: . , „... „.,,.,,,, .,..,.„, 1 „ _,,,,,, I , _.,1...,, ,.; i„, ,,,..1.1. ,„ . ,, ,,,,,,, _.__ , . * .. , „ , , .. ,..-.„,,, ,.. ,,,,,, ,,: ' ', ...,. - -, , ----...,.. , , , + „„ i„.„ ,„ „.- -.„,„, .,.., „. , - -:. t, ,..--- . - Black mangrove propagules growing into the smaller channels have the poten-'14%-'''' -,= l'' ' ... i::,' . - ' ' ';''-' ''''' :44.i,. "',„ 1": to°. '' ''tial to cause blockages if their growth becomes too dense. 111 I'' 4 �Y'C j '�s Z ng r t"� a :yt a'i�•. II' ,-- ..-1°,..• ''....'' - '` 4 i'.",'. '''' ' I' . , ,,.1, $- .,_ '** { I �, ,� s . )1,4.1.1r. ' y p 3 1�� Y 9 .-s r, ;J 11 i f 4i , 4„„);A• *'. *i''‘' ',:-'. '4-'-'-',. ' ''' i ' # ts� $ t � '` ' , ..%4..- i''*.4,7$4,,,„',,'.;.'/' '-",' ', z:". .....- c.-., r 4A. °� A t l } j as i4....',,:: * a ` '� 9i � !Sk 3N. Ig ' t-':,ti‘ 4 ,,:i oriiii,ifti.::47,,,z11.1,1..,:,,i;:..11:._'.7.rilil.,..zkt,..,,._'_,•ti ii.,..!,,,ts,: ,._:,it.:4: ivw4:k.,,:,,,c,,,,it:v.'2.,:, -.,,'R 4,',4,..tt, 4., __ .!Af ''''' *7. '-'1';&1.1., ,-',‘ 7' :'.441;11:,- te: ,1-t, i',.i-.,-.. . '''' . 4;° f_ �'� � - AV*4'' ..t116:. 4*-'','4 t''';,t7:1;''S�` t Y @,yam ,� 1. > 1, * w y t s� sat., t �c , a _4\\,,, ,. ,...,.4 'V'.•'.' '' _. -..‘" ' ,,,, ,,,,N,4 ,"'-,,:'} , • .ill' t.-. '',,, ''' ''''.' , ''41'ii!'12:1 1.0*tfrj 4 4,1: :r.-.',..,,„ '''''''''„. .`"L.- il,,:- A','Ili:-c\li. : ',4''' ,,,- ' , ....„,i i,14'1,:ii:„'"''..1.''''''' 1 I. 144‘, '_ •'' " jet`[, t s x A. Small trees fallen across the waterway can cause blockages. These seem for the most part to break down pretty quickly but can be temporary impediments. Agenda Item#7a-1 Page 6 of 12 1 t „.: . _ it !, ' '� s� I ` ,, , -,- 7.: it ,i ; .tiiii,..«,,,,i7.7,04. „a, 4 : ! • I!! \ :44, :i 1, Jilt r s . ,'., ,tok t; i 40:1410 ,,, .. ' : / 'r » ,* r it' .,-T-". ":"'° • ' '. 11* ir7'. 4 '.' ' IY t ia More black mangrove propagules encroaching 41.i nto channel but still good flow of water through it. r w y f 411.1 A ,. t _ d } / \ K 1 A s eir ,, it fipr-4,.. - F li `.", `: �o-SMC I t £ y 7 V\ iiti »`. ,...-- —� t y;;. r -,rtJC I 'fid.' .3° .; ' - T r 0 a t LLL �� mss ;fie �. ' ` , °`: ' y : 20,r,-.;46744%.%....,tr. ,- - ,.,..i../ Y II P .�/ -trz r _ -�i`r , - ,� ;'-'.. *".\IP"4.'i l''''I '1.- - ,1.-4'%. Mouth of channel at interior pond entrance. The channel is still open but more vegetation growth could eventually cause a blockage. Agenda Item#7a-1 Pa.e 7 of 12 t •'�- ii. aE If Y �fE c• '�• f 5 a • 4 } This is a channel opening into the Bay that is still very open and not in danger of blockage from growth. Question 3:Will digging more channels address standing water still being observed along the Strand wall or elsewhere in die-off area? Based on the flows observed and the general conditions along the wall in the die-off area, I don't think any additional channels at the wall will really help with standing water there. I think it is more of an issue of lower ground levels,either as a result of the construction of the wall or compaction from work and maintenance along that area. We did come across a few spots within the die-off area that were holding water for longer than surrounding areas. It may be possible to improve flushing in these isolated areas with some additional small channels that would tie into the larger ones already in place. We are still mapping these areas along with potential small channel locations to present at a future meeting. Before digging any additional channels,I would like to get some survey information relative to ground elevations through the die-off area from the wall out to the Bay. This will let us know if the standing water is the result of frictional forces holding it back or if it is simply lower ground elevations that would not drain even with channels installed. Most of these areas located so far are close to channels that have been dug already but with just enough distance that they are not reacting as quickly as those areas immediately adjacent to channels and therefore holding water longer to the detriment of seedling recruitment and healthy older trees. We are working on determining where the best locations are for these survey transects as well as potential new channel placements for submittal to the Committee at the January meeting. Agenda Item#7a-1 Pa.e8of12 , t -z ,,i,,,,,,„a r i�, � •``* �` , "�f i ...„„ it. it. 4 .. a , ,,,, ii ;:,,,,,„ , , -,'-'..,,,,.,1,1 1 .-i. .,,rte,.. . 4, g ,, 4 --cc:-.` , ,i. , iitl„ ,, ,i_., „.,,x. -i,-,‘„..,- .r.,--3, 7 , _ .Itt-tt.- ' , '''Y'-g• tr- - } d � S"� rM $-.' ros'14' y j. i ‘i PPP ` r . . .. i 7 , ttli ..,... i , 44.44,et• # ' '4 Ff ..,_„„ , "751 4 Pfe a- P ., ,,-t.i.',.„,,.1','''''f-,1-'t4„':z0.,,‘''i„,,,1i.ei..1,.4.,-„,'*,,.- .- `r t.Y /,” r rr _ ;e Standing water in die-off area that could benefit from an additional flushing channel. : $ #* i., t ill V --- I ....., - P : , , 'if i ' *.„,, A 4” 4 It\ 1 ii • e le' x f. 4„,,,,- 4 , 1 i\j/ ij.1,., _ 4p.,,,,..,ft . , , ' . 4 :, , ' • I,,,t,,., ' tI.',. o0 lomo‘, r, • 4Iit Ir,i.,, ..,,'i',4- ,‘..s,,.._„.„- rf i i i .I • if „ ,*':*,,. I. _'t•,,t,i:\ l,l.',,. AiAA A,t: iIs Nit, ,i,.fi v`- s _. s , ., 1 l ems:' Another small area of standing water in die-off area that may benefit from an additional flushing channel. Agenda Item#7a-1 Page 9 of 12 Based on the field work conducted to date I do not believe that there is much that can be done with respect to eliminating all the water along the Strand and Bay Colony wall through additional channel construction. If we wanted to fill in that area to match the adjacent ground elevations then that could eliminate the standing water there but would take a substantial permitting effort to be allowed to do so. The area would still be a mangrove wetland, but would be at about 3 to 4 inches higher elevation than it currently is. This will be a difficult concept to get agencies to agree to as in their way of looking at things we would be putting fill into a wetland. However,there may be a few small side channels that could be put in to help out in the interior of the larger die-off area. Survey information would help to make the final determination of the viability of new channels. I would still maintain that the most important item to keeping water elevation down to healthy levels is insuring that water can get from Upper Clam Bay to the Pass. Any blockages in the smaller waterways between Upper and Inner, or between Inner and Outer Clam Bays needs to be monitored and maintained as quickly as possible. This is in addition to the maintenance of the Pass itself to insure that all the water within the Clam Bay system can flow as freely as possible. Sincerely, Tim Hall Senior Ecologist Vista Data Vision -Vista Engineering Agenda Item#wage 1 of I Page 10 of 12 Pelican Bay:Clam Pass Tidal Stations Harker 32 Latest trnue:91L2:00 AM 1.2j1 —0°9 F Lvl ft_Avc:PehcarBay Ciam Pass M 1.18 15 —CF,5 rTf_ _Avg:P86.64866 t., ,e .71.7 = �A 2.2- ° ' 5 ` I -"'",'S.7i L ft Avg:Pecan8ay Clam Pass Marker 1} - tic Average Km ® 2 -5,65 - - 2.693 1.401 8259 - _ - TefF Avg:Pd Clam P k t1 1 4 • j ' \-. i -0•5 rpt i 36 8 s r 5 1.6- r 1 � �, y� 1 I r.. , - 4. i � - ' � i a -1.1-a #.E l -0.15 Dai E -0.05 0.259.1 € I I s a I 10 8130,110P144 xR::11:,:.1 8:0O: PM 6:00:50 PM 7:0:00 PM 7:00:00 PM 6/17/231.6 5/ I2}120 9/8/2016 10/812016 11/7/2016 12/16/2015 3: 3 t °'s e;8 Em 4 EXHIBIT 1 http://data.locherenv.com/vdv/V V.php?Type=V V&Station=Pelican%20Bay@@5 72&First=2016... 12/16/2016 Agenda Item#7a-1 Page 11 of 12 Water Level(NG ft)&Rainfall(in) •,.:.- 3/1/2016 .. 1 . t . 1 . . . 4 - , - . 1 - , _,_ x_ , r ,._,._ 3/11/2016 CJ s 1 It 3/21/2016 r — r_. 1 n 3/31/2016 - 1 cv4/10/2016 .� z I ag- 4/20/2016 _ 4/30/2016 5/10/2016fro g 5/20/2016 5. 5/30/2016 �� rl ir 619!2016 . ,.... --- - QJ 3 rn t ,_ 6/19/2016 .ffW vt 6/29/2016 E'""" rts =` 7/9/2016 I t trit 1 1 c 7/19/2016 z "L` [n e' 7/29/2016 rt 471 I ro ✓ a 8/8/201 S 0 8/18/2016 0 NI tt 8/28/2016. Owego m $ Jl) o 9/7/2016 r „+—.... 9/17/2016 p ' Ill f 9/27/2016 ` a ! , _ 1017/201 S � +�.... O ',•••. 3} t 10/17/2016 CT rti ` 10/27/2016 ; s N„ 11/6/2016 -o 11/16/2016 . ,,_ . 11/26/2016 - i i t i 1 3 I 4014 12/6/2016 - ,: r .- r) EXHIBIT 2 Weather History for Naples,FL I Weather Underground Agenda Item# ' e 2 of 5 Page 12 of 12 Actual Average Record Year to date precipitation 34.23 36.76 Snow Snow 0.00 in . -0 Month to date snowfall 0.0 Since 1 July snowfall 0.0 Since 1 September snowfall 0.0 Snow Depth 0.00 in Sea Level Pressure Sea Level Pressure 29.89 in Wind Wind Speed 14 mph[SSE] Max Wind Speed 28 mph Max Gust Speed 43 mph Visibility 8 miles Events Rain T=Trace of Precipitation,MM=Missing Value Source:NWS Daily Summary Daily Weather History Graph rC Tempera ire Devi Point Normal Fllghllnw 3 .. 35 85 _ J I i " J_ - 29 24 midnightl 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 noon 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 10 11 in Ng hPa Barometic Pressure 30.0 - , - 1016 299 - ,_' ! :..-__0—....•-•!---n•- 1mac. ! 1 =a 1019 ! � L .1 . k- 1. .)..._.i !. ' . , 1 -1-. 4 ' ' . L..... _..1._. ' ' ' 1008 28nndright1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 8 10 11 noon 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IrlPh d speed Wind Gust km/! mldraght1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 10 11 noon 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 10 11 3600 N Wird air(deg) 270.0 -V - 1802 -8 .. es ti. . . . aa .rt a arm . . — 9o.0 -E .. . . _ ..r — 0 se , . , . . . , , , , , , . . . . . l nlldrightl 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 noon 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1,1„ report this ad I why ads? EXHIBIT 3 https://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KAPF/2016/9/1/DailyHistory.html?req_city=Na... 12/16/2016 Average annual tidal ranges and ratios for Clam Pass are presented in Figure 10 for the time period between 2008 and 2016. Overall the data shows that the data collected with the newly installed gauges is consistent with data collected with previous gauges. The average annual tidal ranges remain within the range of typical values at Marker locations. The ratios also show that for Marker 4 and 14, in 2016 the ratio was above the 0.6 threshold indicating a stable pass. In 2016, the ratio for Marker 32 is slightly below that of previous years, this could be explained because the gauge was moved further up the bay. The 2016 ratio for Marker 26 increased slightly compared to previous years, this could indicate small improvement in tidal prism near the North Beach Facility Boardwalk area. Monthly and annual tide ranges and range ratios indicate a stable pass. Although the inlet dipped into the critical range at several times over the past year mainly because of tropical storms, it showed signs of recovery each times after the storms, and ratios eventually came back within acceptable values in the following month. Humiston&Moore Engineers I ClamPass-TIDE Agenda Item#7a-2 Page 1 of 3 CLam Pass Tide Monitoring- Click here for Maintenance Dredging Project details Al SIF MARKT it 4 MARKER 14 MAR ,-N 2 mAk.Kr R 3" hA. 41. I r 1 Yat Ji L! s o 6 p> Monthly Time Series 2016(Click on Thumbnails to Expand) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec NA Gage/Gulf Mean Tide Ratios-2016 0.9 PASS T.S. 0-8 DREDGING T.S.COUN NERMINE 0.7 4 0.6 ._..._...._.. ._�..�... ._e_�. __... _..��__ 1-, _,. e Marker 4 OS ). .� �' Marker 14 0.4 ± t Marker 26 f 0.3 ; <:.Marker32 ri : _., 0.1 f" ti. s _ .M Abt:P for megen Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec a&u. Mean Low TideTime Lag -2016 300 PASS DREDGINGI _ 250 W c 200 ru ■Marker 4 te ru 150 - En,Marker 14 y ■Marker 26 7 r"" 104 , c. a Marker 32 o __I ! il 4 110 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Definitions: Mean Tide Ratio: ratio of tide amplitude of gages over the tide amplitude from the Gulf of Mexico,averaged over a month. This ratio is representative of the pass's effectiveness in flushing water from the bay.The lower the ratio,the less efficient is flushing,indicating material accumualting in the pass. Mean Low Tide Laq:time difference between low tide in the Gulf of Mexico and at the gage's locations,averaged over a month in minutes.The time lag is also represenattive of the pass's effectiveness in flushing water from the bay.The higher the lag the less efficient is flushing,indicating material accumulating in the pass. Background Clam Pass is a small wave dominated inlet on the southwest coast of Florida that provides a tidal connection to 500 acres of the wetland preserve of Clam Bay Natural Resource Protection Area(NRPA).This preserve includes several interconnected bays surrounded by extensive areas of mangrove wetlands. The preserve is a pristine environmental resource that is collectively known as Clam Bay. Clam Pass has gone through periods of inlet migration as well as closure, because the relatively small tidal prism for Clam Bay provides critical balance between tidal energy and littoral process at the inlet channel. Humiston&Moore Engineers provides professional engineering services to Pelican Bay Services Division of Collier County, Florida for Clam Pass and Clam Bay.Humiston&Moore Engineers provided engineering services to assist Turrell Hall& Associate in the development of the Clam Bay NRPA management plan of 1998 and the updated plan of 2014.The engineering services included the development of design criteria for the inlet stability and conditions for maintenance dredging to maintain hydraulic efficiency and avoid potential inlet closure including.The implementation of the NRPA management plan includes various monitoring to maintain the health of the eco system.In addition to the ecological and biological monitoring of the bay system and its function as a protected environmental resource,the monitoring program includes hydraulic and physical monitoring of the inlet and bay system to monitor the stability of the pass and assess maintenance requirements.Monitoring of the hydraulic and physical conditions of the Clam Bay system continues according to the updated NRPA management plan. The hydraulic monitoring includes continuous water level and tidal data collection at 4 locations within the bay system. http://www.humistonandmoore.com/clampass-tide 12/28/2016 N Co N 5 �� I I i R 1 I 45 11 Is ! ' ts I Is s —-. . — i _... :...,, : _..... cv .....,. ,,.-'..N .._f4 w.. ...-.r IQ -s ... - —N - «-A �v •.....•_N ....- —EYV _... _....�..N .: _N + ..... - _.. r A . ....,.....—A -+ A N ....,. N _ - s.N _... ..... N ....._,N 4--- T .. R CJ — ... R ... 8 _ g . of rn _... o, _..,..:r.......,. —CO T ..::........n .. .........,t+ _n _... ....{..r+ $ • 8 D . a cs p .I... _ ' m ._.c., _. .., _m ...m 4 _. .....y.,O ......q..O 1.,. .1..O .s.. O S .4... �.....�.8 .... ....•+.,wir 8 —8 _-..._ .... - _8 _---• - .._.8 _ —.. .}.8 _••••• .•...•"Y8 _._ ; rg . —8 -+ —8 .4.,,.... ....._8 _ ., ' _8 .,....,. 8 8 _... ....T 8 r-- .T 8 r... —8 —8 T.. '...._$ . g . I 1 rz I i lz I I I I 1 I I I N 4 N ON 0 N 4 N 0 N N 4 N 4 4 N 0 N 4 IIn0 PIP antleiNI t1 ilnileVI gz iaia¢W LE W N M CO Q COPa I I I R I ! 18 I I � I ( 18 I I -a : ; . N �.. N it N t-r v • C cv �..... .. [`!, �......:. .._tV _..._ _.fy 1-,- ...._q -,--•f` afvV fY fPV P i(N ..�..N ...i N _..... ....s.N -•r _.N r G TR . ...'- ..-+ i3 — ....0 . .4..O., s.,..........-61 ....CO a.... ..........Ql — b.01 _ ..__O ... CD -. CO CR. .... t� Pr ^ .. ... ,. .1-- ..F ... T 1 r Rr � T - «1(} ems- r a g in V r r r ; ....E y ......_g — -- '8 mss- ,,.'.8 .,..., + �.... r i I i I i i I t 1 N Q N O N O N n N O el IN N O N O N O N O Me 4 Ja./tppy I•!ialipW W MAN Z£30)1m641 Agenda Item#7a-3 Page 1 of 1 Clam Bay Copper ug/L Collection Date CB1 CB2 CB3 CB4 CBS CB6 CB7 CB8 CB9 Report Date 6/22/2016 0.862 0.700 0.700 0.700 1.640 2.100 0.700 3.520 1.510 9/8/2016 7/20/2016 0.924 5.330 5.110 5.660 2.470 3.960 4.950 5.710 10.500 9/12/2016 7/20/2016 0.924 6.160 4.700 1.690 2.470 1.830 1.980 1.870 8.360 9/21/2016 8/25/2016 2.000 1.850 1.680 1.470 1.240 1.520 2.250 1.280 8.060 10/4/2016 9/20/2016 1.690 2.280 1.280 1.760 0.751 0.700 0.700 1.030 0.700 11/22/2016 10/12/2016 2.760 2.200 2.130 1.190 2.900 1.860 1.060 0.954 1.310 12/7/2016 Agenda Item#7a-4 Page 1 of 2 Protecting Manatees in Clam Bay By Susan O'Brien, Chair of the Pelican Bay Services Division's Clam Bay Committee Manatees are among the unique creatures that can be found in Clam Bay. Also known as "sea cows," manatees are the only herbivorous marine mammals, with seagrasses as a primary food source. These large gentle animals inhabit Florida's coastal waters, congregating in warm waters by power plants or in the southern parts of their range in the winter and dispersing widely the rest of the year. Florida's manatee population has increased since it was first listed as a federal endangered species in 1966 to about 6000 today. But habitat loss and strikes by boats and propellers remain major threats. Photos of manatees in Clam Pass and in the waterway near the County's boardwalk to Clam Pass Park have recently been taken. Data recorded by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) in 2006-08 documented that the density of manatees in Clam Bay is the highest in the North Region of Collier County, which also includes Wiggins Pass,Vanderbilt Lagoon, and Moorings Bay. To protect manatees from high-speed watercraft activity in Clam Bay, local advocates are requesting that the FWC designate Clam Bay as a manatee protection zone with slow speed. To assist in this effort Pelican Bay members and guests are encouraged to take photos of manatees in Clam Bay and record the date, time, and location of the sighting and send the photos or information about the sighting to office@PelicanBayServicesDivision.net. This documentation of manatees in Clam Bay is very important in the effort to have Clam Bay designated a manatee protection zone by the FWC. From 1996 to 2009 Clam Bay was an idle speed/no wake zone, per Collier County Ordinance 96-16 enacted after Clam Bay was included in the 1995 Collier County Manatee Protection Plan. A change in Florida law in 2009 invalidated this speed restriction, and an upsurge in high speed boat and personal watercraft activity in Clam Bay since 2009 has been documented through photographs. This high speed activity not only endangers manatees, but also seagrasses,their food source. In 2016 the FWC initiated a review of manatee protection rules in Collier County and a ten- person committee was established by the Board of County Commissioners. Collier County's Local Rules Review Committee (LRRC) was comprised of one boating advocate and one manatee advocate from each of the five districts in Collier County. The committee met seven times last spring, and advocates for Clam Bay attended and presented evidence that Clam Bay should be designated a manatee protection zone. The LRRC voted 7-2 to recommend Clam Bay as a manatee protection zone to the FWC. FWC staff decided against supporting the LRRC's recommendation that Clam Bay be designated a manatee protection zone. Representatives of the Pelican Bay Foundation,the Pelican Bay Services Division, the Pelican Bay Property Owners Association,the Mangrove Action Group and other local conservationists sent a letter to FWC commissioners to state the case for supporting the LRRC's recommendation. Also several Pelican Bay members and officials, including an attorney representing the Pelican Bay Foundation, attended the FWC Commissioners' meeting in St. Petersburg on November 16, 2016, to speak on behalf of having Clam Bay designated a manatee Agenda Item#7a-4 Page 2 of 2 protection zone with slow speed. The commissioners did not vote to designate Clam Bay a manatee protection zone, but did ask FWC staff to continue to discuss the issue with the Foundation's attorney. The next step of FWC's process of establishing manatee protection rules is to hold a public hearing in the county for which the rules are being considered. The public hearing in Collier County is expected to be held in late January 2017. Either before or after the public hearing any photos or descriptions of manatee sightings in Clam Bay will be extremely helpful in this effort to have Clam Bay designated a manatee protection zone by FWC. Mary McLean Johnson, Pelican Bay Foundation Board, and Linda Roth, Mangrove Action Group Board, contributed to this article. Agenda Item#7b Page 1 of 1 Landscape & Safety Committee Report Jan. 4, 2017 The Landscape & Safety Committee met on Dec. 20, 2016 at the Pelican Bay Community Center at 10:15 AM. The following items were discussed and/or action was taken: 1. PBSD Administrator, Neil Dorrill, reported on the possible median cut across from Oak Lake Sanctuary on Gulf Park Drive. A median cut would allow east bound traffic on Gulf Park Dr. toward US 41 to make a U-turn. Collier County has a committee that evaluates all such projects and at this time it would take approximately 2 years. IF PBSD funded the project (approx. $55,000-$60,000) the county would provide the design engineering in-house and fast track the project. 2. A unanimous vote of the committee approved a motion to recommend to the full PBSD Board that the PBSD generate mulch in-house as recommended by the Cost Savings Strategy Committee (saving approx. $30,000). 3. The committee voted 4-1 to not discontinue PBSD landscaping and maintenance functions between the curb and sidewalk adjacent to Pelican Bay member associations. 4. Staff presented the consultant's report on trees that are compromising street light illumination. Staff will employ an arborist to assist in trimming the offending trees. 5. The Chairman proposed that the L&S Cte. adopt Mike Shepherd's Landscape Management Plan formally after careful consideration and study over the next month or two. 6. The L&S Cte. will meet regularly on the third Tues. of each month at the Pelican Bay Community Center at 10:15. 7. Dodder Vine removal is underway. 8. A brief discussion on a courtesy posting when trimming is to take place adjacent to a resident's property or association. (e.g. in the PB Post with our monthly column or online with an "In the Bay" posting). Submitted By: Joe Chicurel, Chairman Landscape & Safety Committee Agenda Item 7bii-1 Page 1 of 2 From: Jim Carr [mailto:jim.carr@abbinc.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 4:02 PM To: JacobLisa; Tom Barber Subject: RE: Request(s) Lisa, Attached is our preliminary opinion of cost for the north berm. This is based on providing rip rap and fill restoration for approximately 290 linear feet from where the existing rip rap ends north of Montenero, running east to the North Tram station. The fill dirt and rock quantities are probably over estimated based on conservative assumptions. If we go ahead with the project we will get survey topo and provide cross sections that will generate more accurate quantities. I will forward the proposal later this afternoon or early in the morning. I expect the total is about$7900 including tasks for survey existing cross sections, prepare plans, SFWMD permitting/coordination (as necessary), survey stake out construction,and construction observation services. Jas 'A. Carr, P.E. Agnoli,Barber&Brundage,Inc. 7400 Trail Boulevard,Suite 200 Naples,FL 34108 239.597.3111 ext 215 239.566.2203 fax Agenda Item 7bii-1 Page 2 of 2 Agnoli,Barber&Brundage, Inc Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost January 3,2017 Pelican Bay North Berm Restoration Engineer's Preliminary Opinion of Cost Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Total Cost Cost 1 MOBILIZATION LS I $5,000.00 $5,000.00 2 CLEARING,EXCAVATION AND GRADING LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 3 FILL MATERIAL(INCLUDES 25%COMPACTION)(2'x 6'x 290') CY 65 $50.00 $3,250.00 4 RIP-RAP WITH FILTER FABRIC(8'x 290') SY 260 $25.00 $6,500.00 5 SOD(BAHIA)(8'x 290') SY 260 $3.00 $780.00 6 DOUBLE ROW SILT FENCE LF 350 $2.00 $700.00 7 STAKED TURBIDITY BARRIER(PER SECTION)/MISC.EROSION CONTROL LF 400 $15.00 $6,000.00 TOTAL $27,230.00 20%CONTINGENCY $5,446.00 TOTAL 110%OF PROBABLE COST $32,676.00 12.0 SUMMARY The following are brief summarizes of work completed and recommendations for each major monitoring category: Mangrove Monitoring ETE monitored eleven (II) mangrove plots previously established by THA, two (2) plots previously established by Lewis, and established eight(8) new plots in mangrove die-off areas. In each plot,the mangrove species, diameter and abundance was recorded, as well as the condition of each tree. ETE plots established in the identified mangrove die- off areas reflect the scale and scope of mortality within them. We included data for the number of remaining trees showing stress to give an indication of potential future mortality within the plots. Next year's monitoring of ETE plots will be a great indicator of whether the health of trees in these areas is trending upward or downward. ETE recommends abandonment\replacement of the final two (2) Lewis plots to make them consistent with all other mangrove plots. Coastal Scrub Monitoring There is a lot of exotic vegetation in the coastal scrub habitat north of Clam Pass—the entire stretch from the pass to the south end of Bay Colony is infested with Scaevola. Scaevola is a Category 1 exotic plant as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council's list of invasive plant species. It is known for supplanting native coastal vegetation, forming dense monoculture areas. Additionally,there is a lot of Wedelia mixed into the sea oats and beach sunflower groundcover, especially south of Clam Pass. The coastal scrub habitat is home to a significant population of gopher tortoise. The gopher tortoise would benefit greatly if the Scaevola were removed-management of these exotic vegetation infestations could improve the tortoise foraging habitat and help increase the overall gopher tortoise population. Sea Grass Monitoring Overall coverage in 2016 was 5.61 acres, up from 4.71 acres in 2015. This increase was despite dredging activities in April of 2016. Percent cover densities within the mapped sea grass areas were generally higher in 2016 than 2015. Monitoring next year may give a better indication of any potential impacts or benefits from the Clam Pass dredging activities. Listed Species Monitoring ETE conducted a specific purpose survey to determine gopher tortoise utilization of habitat within the Clam Bay NRPA. A total of 141 active and potentially occupied burrows were identified during the survey. The gopher tortoise population was estimated at 71 individuals (adults &juveniles). ETE observed and noted pockets of several juvenile- sized burrows at multiple locations, giving an idea of where breeding may be taking place. Abandoned burrows are also noted in our survey, which may include old, collapsed burrows or potential armadillo burrows. Management of foraging habitat within the coastal scrub is the key to maintaining and growing the existing gopher tortoise population. Exotic Vegetation Monitoring The majority of exotic and nuisance vegetation in Clam Bay was observed along the "margins" —the east side of the mangroves along the tram berm and the west side of the NRPA in the beach dunes. These areas are adjacent to the greatest human activity around the system. Exotic plants identified during mapping included, but are not limited to: air potato, alligator weed, Australian pine, balsam apple, bishop wood, Brazilian pepper, carrotwood, cattail, Cuban laurel fig,java plum, seaside mahoe, old world climbing fern, periwinkle,scaevola, shoebutton ardisia, strawberry guava, and wedelia. ETE will be working with PBSD to specifically target and kill exotic vegetation in the trouble areas identified in the exotic mapping events. Water Level Monitoring Of note in looking at the summary graphs, is that the water levels in the wells are heavily influenced by the lunar cycle. This is especially evident in November 2016, when there were no recorded rain events, but there were significant changes in water levels (lasting a week to I 0 days) that are apparently associated with full and new moons. On the graphs, full moons are indicated by the upper curves at +1,the new moons by the lower curves at-I. Water levels at all three (3) wells have been above the ground nearly continuously since July of 2016. The highest 2016 water levels throughout the Clam Bay system appear to have occurred around September 1st, where water was approximately 1.5 feet above natural ground at all 3 wells for at least a week. Interestingly,the largest rain event of the year that occurred in late June and totaled roughly 5 inches did not have a huge impact on water levels at any of the loggers. Continued maintenance and monitoring of the water level loggers is important as they provide data critical to assessing the health of Clam Bay. Hand Dug Channel Inspections ETE reviewed and assessed previously hand dug channels within the Clam Bay system. The channels were originally dug to allow for tidal flushing of mangroves. ETE comprehensively mapped the locatable channel segments in the northern portion of Clam Bay (near mangrove die-off areas). ETE also assessed the condition of each, with respect to depth of channel below natural grade. Many channel segments had depths below natural grade of less than 6 inches, with most of these found at "downstream" locations along the eastern edge of the mangroves where they empty into Clam Bay. Going forward, ETE recommends accurately mapping the existing hand dug channels in the remainder of Clam Bay and reassessing the methods by which they are maintained. Recreation Facilities Monitoring All markers and signage were found to be in good condition with no apparent issues. ETE is slated to conduct future inspections after any major storm events. Archaeological Site Monitoring No obvious signs of shell mounds were observed in the locations identified and no signs of disturbance was observed.