The URL can be used to link to this page

CCPC Backup 12/15/2016 COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING BACKUP DOCUMENTS DECEMBER 15, 2016 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., DECEMBER 15, 2016, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, THIRD FLOOR, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—November 17,2016 6. BCC REPORT-RECAPS 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. PUDZ-PL20150002737: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County,Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from an Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to an Industrial Planned Unit Development (IPUD) zoning district to allow solid waste and resource recovery facilities and public vehicle and equipment storage and repair facilities for a project to be known as Collier County Resource Recovery Business Park IPUD on property located 1.5 miles east of Collier Boulevard and one mile north of White Lake Boulevard in Section 25,Township 49 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida consisting of 344±acres;providing for repeal of Resolution No. 09-275; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Eric Johnson, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner] 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. PUDZ-PL20160001255: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County,Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project known as Hamilton Place RPUD to allow development of up to 66 single-family and/or multi-family dwelling units on property located east of Livingston Road and south of Pine Ridge Road in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.75+/- acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator:Eric L Johnson,AICP,CFM,Principal Planner] B. An ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, amending Ordinance Number 04-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which includes the comprehensive land regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by providing for: Section One, Recitals; Section Two, Findings of Fact; Section Three,Adoption of Amendments to the Land Development Code,more specifically amending the following: Chapter Two—Zoning Districts and Uses, including section 2.03.06 Planned Unit Development Districts; Chapter Five—Supplemental Standards,adding section 5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Courses;Chapter Six—Infrastructure Improvements and Adequate Public Facilities Requirements, including section 6.05.01 Water Management Requirements, adding section 6.05.03 Stormwater Plans for Single-Family Dwelling Units, Two-Family Dwelling Units, and Duplexes; Section Four, Conflict and Severability; Section Five, Inclusion in the Collier County Land Development Code; and Section Six, Effective Date. [Coordinator: Caroline Cilek,Manager,LDC,Development Review] 10. NEW BUSINESS 11. OLD BUSINESS 12. PUBLIC COMMENT 13. ADJORN CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows/jmp 03G-)z D� O� ,.�",n�o me 1 -imam rn Z,- k ZONING — ES__ ____TATES —_ _. ________ 1 Z ,, 0 , _:,,,,,„...„_,_„..,..._ •• ��•I! bite! • A. !••!s D ciIIi ,.. .,„,,,,....4„....,„,.......„, . , ,,, „ ,, ,., , . 6 m -, -,CD W D k . -2,-,-L',-'-',-'-'.i ell M K xi O r- l i D y G7 n � m� 7 i Z 0 I, z I ., c)1 m co D � '� D I N 0�1 I 1 D� xlO i D- m c o pD -,1 z c ��m � �� \�rT, z + , . -, , , II \\\ -\ ,, --, \ ) . 4-cc -�\�� rn 15. CCn r \\ , ,. ,. . ,..„ .„, „ .„, .„ Z O O 3 Cnv4 C • SD D / z , ,\ , '1-N ' ' ----1 L D \ n \\\�- \\\*•• m m \\�-, ��\\- � m lel zo �Z 0. �n t ,,.- ,- -- --"----� J ZrOTIu) m (Z ,c 0b m< T�'.� � � �� \ ci mD N m m �`� �4 gm GARLAND ROAD M r A J nq D A K 00 -, 13 mo m m N N D Xi X (/) 'C o o m1- vAm> ZONING — AGRICULTURE ° O 0 Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic removal in accordance with LDC Section 4.06.02 and LDC Section 4.06.05.E.1:supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC Section 3.05.07. CC PC December 15, 2016 PUDZ-PL2016O001225 Hamilton Place November 17, 2016 Collier County Planning Commission Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on November 28, 2016 and furnish proof of publication to the attention of Eric Johnson, Principal Planner in the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The advertisement must be a 114 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section] FUND& COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500172052 Account Number: 068779 Authodi d Designee signature for CCPC Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, December 15th, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001225] (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to Thursday, December 15th, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman Airpc4 liting RD — F 1 -- M i to o o o 2 x o. \\I Livingston RD o ... "' o Account #068779 Corporate Reference #505868 November 18, 2016 Attn: Legals Naples News Media Group 1100 Immokalee Rd. Naples, Florida 34110 Re: PUDZ-PL20160001225, Hamilton Place Dear Legals: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Monday, November 28, 2016, and send an Affidavit of Publication, together with charges involved, to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500172052 November 17, 2016 Collier County Planning Commission Public Hearing Advertising Requirements Please publish the following Advertisement and Map on November 28, 2016 and furnish proof of publication to the attention of the Board's Minutes and Records Department, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 401, Naples, Florida 34112. The advertisement must be a 1/4 page advertisement, and the headline in the advertisement must be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement must not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Please reference the following on ALL Invoices: DIVISION: ZONING [Zoning Services Section] FUND & COST CENTER: 131-138326-649100-00000 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 4500172052 Account Number: 068779 Authorized Designee signature for CCPC Advertising NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, December 15th, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] (insert map) All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to Thursday, December 15th, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252- 8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman Airport-loulling RD p CD ag m o - CD Livingston RD o I • Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S. Vergara Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 9:42 AM To: Naples Daily News Legals Subject: PUDZ-PL20160001225 Hamilton Place Attachments: PUDZ-PL20160001225 Hamilton Place (CCPC 12-15-16).doc; PUDZ-PL20160001225 Hamilton Place (CCPC 12-15-2016).doc Hello, Please advertise the following attached ad Monday, November 28, 2016. Please forward an ok when received, if you have any questions feel free to call me. Thanks, Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Dept. Clerk of the Circuit Court & Value Adjustment Board Office: (239) 252-7240 Fax: (239) 252-8408 E-mail: martha.vergaracollierclerk.com 1 Martha S. Vergara From: Gori, Ivonne <Ivonne.Gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 10:54 AM To: Martha S. Vergara Subject: RE: PUDZ-PL20160001225 Hamilton Place Confirmed receipt From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 9:42 AM To: NDN-Legals<legals@naplesnews.com> Subject: PUDZ-PL20160001225 Hamilton Place Hello, Please advertise the following attached ad Monday, November 28, 2016. Please forward an ok when received, if you have any questions feel free to call me. Thanks, Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Dept. Clerk of the Circuit Court Value Adjustment Board Office: (239) 252-7240 Fax: (239) 252-8408 E-mail: martha.vergara@collierclerk.com Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient,you must not copy,distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. Unless expressly stated,opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Clerk's Office by emailing helpdesk@collierclerk.com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents.The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain. Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Martha S. Vergara From: Gori, Ivonne <Ivonne.Gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 4:52 PM To: Martha S. Vergara Subject: FW: 1368601 date and ad #at bottom....THANKS! FW: PUDZ-PL20160001225 Hamilton Place Attachments: N D-13686011egal.pdf Please find a proof for your review and approval. thanks! lvonne 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on Thursday, December 15th, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.2004-41,AS AMENDED,THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI- FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,CONSISTING OF 9.75+/-ACRES;AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001255) Pine Ridge RD - c'i' i o n; - -- Green BLVD c PROJECT 0__- LOCATION of All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office,fourth floor,Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401, Naples, FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday, December 15th,2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman Nwambrr 36.3016 NP-1366601 0 PROOF O.K.BY: 0 O.K.WITH CORRECTIONS BY: PLEASE READ CAREFULLY•SUBMIT CORRECTIONS ONLINE ADVERTISER:BCC_ZONING DEPARTMENT PROOF CREATED AT: 11/18/2016 11:19 PM SALES PERSON: Ivonne Gori PROOF DUE:- PUBLICATION:ND-DAILY NEXT RUN DATE: 11/28/16 ND-1368601.INDD SIZE:3 col X 9.25 in Martha S. Vergara From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:33 AM To: Martha S. Vergara Cc: Stone, Scott; JohnsonEric; Reischl, Fred; KulakPatricia Subject: re: CCPC - PUDZ-PL20160001225 - Hamilton Place Attachments: ND-13686011egal.pdf The proof looks good, thank you! "Wanda Rodriguez, .SCT .advanced Certified ParategaC Office of the County.attorney (239)252-8400 From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 4:58 PM To: JohnsonEric; StoneScott; RodriguezWanda; AshtonHeidi Subject: CCPC - PUDZ-PL20160001225 - Hamilton Place Hello All, Attached for your review is the aforementioned ad proof. Let me know if there are any changes to this ad ASAP as it runs Monday next week and we will all be off. Thanks, Martha Uncle: Honda Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Martha S. Vergara From: Ashton, Heidi Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:40 AM To:. Martha S. Vergara;JohnsonEric; Stone, Scott; Rodriguez, Wanda Subject: RE: CCPC - PUDZ-PL20160001225 - Hamilton Place Approved. / f//,l4skt04-Cle10 Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 800 Naples, FL 34112 (239) 252-8400 From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 4:58 PM To: JohnsonEric; StoneScott; RodriguezWanda; AshtonHeidi Subject: CCPC - PUDZ-PL20160001225 - Hamilton Place Hello All, Attached for your review is the aforementioned ad proof. Let me know if there are any changes to this ad ASAP as it runs Monday next week and we will all be off. Thanks, Martha Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S. Vergara Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:55 AM To: 'Gori, Ivonne' Subject: RE: 1368601 date and ad # at bottom....THANKS! FW: PUDZ-PL20160001225 Hamilton Place Morning Ivonne, This ad has been reviewed and approved by the legal department. Please proceed with publishing as requested. Thanks, Martha From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:Ivonne.Gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 4:52 PM To: Martha S. Vergara <Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com> Subject: FW: 1368601 date and ad # at bottom....THANKS! FW: PUDZ-PL20160001225 Hamilton Place Please find a proof for your review and approval. thanks! Ivonne 1 Martha S. Vergara From: Gori,Ivonne <Ivonne.Gori@naplesnews.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:59 AM To: Martha S.Vergara Subject: REVISED FW: 1368601 Attachments: N D-13686011egal.pdf Good morning! Please see a better version of the ad I sent yesterday. Let me know if you approve Thanks! Ivonne Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,December 15th,2016,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL.,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] Pine Ridge RD 0 m 1-75 p n C Green BLVD c PROJECT y LOCATION All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401, Naples, FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,December 15th, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252- 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman November 28,2016 ND-1368601 0 PROOF O.K.BY: 0 O.K.WITH CORRECTIONS BY: PLEASE READ CAREFULLY•SUBMIT CORRECTIONS ONLINE ADVERTISER:BCC_ZONING DEPARTMENT PROOF CREATED AT: 11/21/2016 5:25 PM SALES PERSON: Ivonne Gori PROOF DUE:- PUBLICATION:ND-DAILY NEXT RUN DATE: 11/28/16 ND-1368601.INDD SIZE:3 col X 9.25 in Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S. Vergara Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:01 AM To: 'Gori, Ivonne' Subject: RE: REVISED FW: 1368601 That does look better... a little closer together!! Yes, it has been approved please proceed with publishing. Martha From: Gori, Ivonne [mailto:Ivonne.Gori@naplesnews.com] Sent:Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:59 AM To: Martha S. Vergara <Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com> Subject: REVISED FW: 1368601 Good morning! Please see a better version of the ad I sent yesterday. Let me know if you approve Thanks! Ivonne Ivonne Gori Legal Advertising Specialist Natiti I P TBa Kv Office: 239.213.6061 Ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com NaplesNews.com 1 TOD • L (.) 0001255 42L" +Uri CP( C, 18A Monday,November 28,2016 Naples Daily News NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,December 15th,2016,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL,to consider. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING'CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] Pine Rid•e RD A l- c I-75 � o g Green BLVD PROJECT h LOCATION Ce • • Js All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401, Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,December 15th, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252- 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available In the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission • Mark Strain,Chairman November 28,2016 ND-1368601 .. ..4apirsB aiLij ritts NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT 1368601 PUBLIC HEARING 45-172052 Pub Dates November 28,2016 2/ anfr-eP 1?%,0,-, (Sign ure of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me 4 ;rain;;�,,, IVONNE GOBI This Decembe 01,2016 ., Notary Public-State o1 Florida I •s Commission r FF 900070 �P;= My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 / • 1 ' /;;,,`.:�•` Bonded through National Notary Assn. , �LL 'i ' ' (Signatur of affiant) ' 16A Monday,November 28,2016 Naples Daily News Army's advance in Aleppo --- displaces thousands - C Rebel defenses collapse Syrian state TV broadcast a video Sat- 4) urday showing a teary reunion between a before government attack soldier and his family after nearly five Eyears apart,according to the report.It said - f';. L PHILIP ISSA ASSOCIATED PRESS the family had been trapped in Masaken Hanan. AWE YOUR ,1`,t, E al Thousands of residents fled Sunday The Lebanese Al-ManarTV channel re- _ MOTHER f�W IN-L 0. amid simultaneous advances by Syrian ported from the neighborhood Sunday a) CD government and Kurdish-led forces into morning,showing workers and soldiers A modern minor/mm w,ison Lighangis Q Z eastern Aleppo. clearing debris against a backdrop of guaranteed to wow all your guests Let us Rebel defenses collapsed as govern- bombed-out buildings on both sides of a help you prep for the holidays today, 0) W ment forces pushed into the city's Sakhour wide thoroughfare.Al-Manar is operated C a neighborhood,coming within about half a by Hezbollah,the Lebanese militant group •C W mile of commandingt timeidor in eastern �The with the lySyrian government. Alepposince rebelsSyrian Democratic C = swept into the city in 2012,according to Forces'advance into Bustan al-Basha N _ Syrian state media and the Syrian Obser- dealt the opposition a further blow. V vatory for Human Rights monitoring Rebels and opposition figures have U) Q group. long accused the SDF and its predecessor 1,9u Cl 5 J Kurdish-led forces operating autono- groups of conspiring with the government CO m measly of the rebels and the government, to quash a nationwide revolt. SINCE 1975 (6 Q meanwhile,seized the Boston lep al-Basha Araj denied there was any coordination Q. neighborhood in northern Aleppo,allow- between government and Kurdish-led 1 Nu NAPLES 2463 Trade Center Way 239-592-6006 Z Z < 0. ing thousands of civilians to flee the deci- forces. BONITA SPRINGS•3333 Renaissance Blvd'239-9409000 mated district,according to Ahmad Hiso "We were responding to calls fromresi- Monday-Thursday s m e-Prlday 9 w 5 Saturday I0 m 3 ' Araj,an official with the Syrian Democrat- dents in Bustan al-Basha to secure the ,si,,,,,,ii,,,i i,,,,_,„„ I I,.II I I N I, is Forces. neighborhood,"he said.He added the SDF The government's push,backed by had entered the area handily as rebel mil- to thousands of Shiite militia fighters from itants fled. °,y I i Lebanon,Iraq,and Scan,and under the oc- Aleppo used to be Syria's largest city a art PLANTATION y p gc p*E!{^{g p°y IS I casional cover of the Russian air force has and commerce capital before its neighbor P,„ y�j lint '-,., .' r"l,.HS4 ti d ION C laid waste to Aleppo s eastern neighbor hoods were devastoted by the country's -6 •aal I s ,rs i 0 hoods and trapped some 250,000 people ore than five-year-long civil war Mu w .ar § R S m N Food supplies are running perilously The ti N.'s child agency warned Sun- - -- 1ow,the U.N.warned Thursday,and a re- day that nearly 500,000 children were now — �' " ' a) tentless air assault by government forces living under siege in Syria,cut off f ARE has damaged or destroyed every hospital food and medical aid,mostly in area un f6 C in the area der government control Thar Pigme ha _ 9 d) a_ — Residents in east Aleppo said in dis- doubled in less than a year — ' g V) .. Q tressed messages on social media that Many are now spending their days un I Z pa 5' f U thousands of people were fleeing to the derground, as hospitals, schools and - �, ¢ _� i' city's government-controlled western homes remain vulnerable to aerial bom 'N 0 neighborhoods,away from the govern- bardment -' ;YiP!1G.l4r orf f'2F6oR"' N Uto ment's merciless assault,or deeper into "Children are being killed and injured, Plantation Shutters I Blinds&Shades I Hurricane Fabric I Impact Windows&Doors -0 0) a) d) opposition-held eastern Aleppo. too afraid to go to school or even play,sur- Exterior Bahamas&Colonials 1 Rolldown&Accordion Shutters Ci) 0< < ( The situation in besieged Aleppo(is) viving with little food and hardly any Visit our Showroom Today or Call to Schedule Your le-Home Estimate very very bad,thousands of eastern rose medicine,"said UNICisinno utiveD dents are moving to the western side of the tor Anthony Lake"Thus is no way to live ''et Save$300 city,"said Khaled Khatib,a photographer and too many are dying." for the Syrian Civil Defense search and Activists also reported civilian casual s a ononrdero7 rescue group,also known as the White ties Sunday from a presumed government - 1,0 iaR or more Helmets. or Russian airstrdce on a village outside '.�f. ^ of Premium sooner:. "Aleppo is going to die,"he posted on Aleppo. Presentesus at nine Twitter. The Local Coordination Committees Can of berRemoved C Syrian state media reported govern- activist network in Syria reported 15 civil- NAPLES SHUTTER won acne,offerr. '— ment forces had seized the Jabal Badro inns killed in a Russian airstrike on the vil- WWW,DapleS5ll Utte LCOt11 cip,ae 11/9901 if) neighborhood and entered Sakhour Sun- lage of Aujara,controlled by the opposi- N day after it took control of the Masaken tion m the western Aleppo countryside, 1025 Power St.,Naples,FL 34104 I Mon-Fri 8:30am-5:O0pm Hanan neighborhood Saturday. and tens of others wounded. CDr 0 x NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 0 CO _ ALLERGIES? Q O Q NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE M — V Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning r Z M Z Commission at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,December 15th,2016,In the Board of County AST H M A - Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamlaml Trail,Naples FL.,to consider: °' AN OF COUNTY COMERS OF COLIER HEA DAC H E S? COUNANCE T,,N LORIDAFAMENDINGTHERD ORDINANCE NO.2004141,AS AMENDED`THE _C E COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF a)• Z d) * * * * COLLIER COUNTY.FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS O T MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN E _ _I R D UCT DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL(A) ZONING DISTRICT TOA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(RPUD)ZONING Z a) A , ' R - ' ' ' ' 1 ■ DISTRICT FOR THE OF UP TOO CT66 SKNGO SINGLE-FAMILY HAMILTON PL TE RPUD TO ALLOW DWELLING -0 CO N 0 UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE Q C CO 0 (1•0 H-E RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH.RANGE 26 FAST,COLLIER E EOUNTY,FLORIDA,CONSISTING OF 9.75+/-ACRES,AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.SECTION 18,TOWNSHIP [PUDZ Additional Services Include: Licensed&Insured •A/C Cleaning•Air Handler Cleaningroryour prole 5Sfh I Pine Ridge RD CACI 816190 •Sanitizing*Duct Repairs MRSR91•MRSA75 1/ •Certified Mold Removal m I-75 •Before&After Inspection a •State-of-the-Art UV Purification e ,, Green BLVD CO Systems ATI;„ m 0 Lowest Price;,::FREE,i ■O0/O All interested partes are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed • Ever! ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, �,.w. fourth floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East Tam am Trail.sure 401, Q $499511 Mold ;n F F l Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be fled I i with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section prior to Thursday December 15th, 6/I 11 Inspection F , Ito p t 7s� L (Regw a person decides to appeal any ver made by he Collier County Planning a�� i With NDN 1' Commissionwth respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will W /u Unlimited;; Coupon \ ed d of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a if y verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and l v-Wil Vents! $99) P evidence upon which the appeal's to be based (includes1 main;;With NON Coupon Only ii onl1' � • - , 11 you area person with a disability who needs any accommodation n order to � k //��wNN //FFA, n (,3"- +{ , participate In this proceedng you are entitled at no cost to you to the provision of 110r . &Return) f certain assistance.Please contact the Collier CountyFac It es Management Division, 10it withN°NCoupon Only II 5, located at 3335 Tam am Trail East Suite 101 Naples FL 34112&356,(239)252- M 52- ■M Z 0 R 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing • Z To l l Free: 888-458-9428 impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Of/ice. Collier County Planning Commission tri es man ` Naples: 239-530-0104 November mer 28.216 November 28,2016 ND-1368601 2 y 0r OQ c7 v ce- Or r Qo 2to mG ....3 La ? J -(1= w tli,., c -- ta (.„ v.... urrN � ICa O0* G1 J � aZ ,_ r 7- c, u.... 0 , fv---‘,,, S 6 0�� 2 oi•-• Qa o N NoQo; Q •1 j�dmjz o- .kir u, j 20 a o - 0 v 2 � = J - rill yom� yv, J 0'4,1 J`tLIAO C _ mar DuiZ �'0N w�' � cd 2. \-- (3) 4 v . . r.-:i� � CvO � Q� � � N �o Ooo to Ks ,ot. r-pOv1y °- u- =NZ1y U) j c� l � Zd� 2N j �\ ( No� a Z� O Qm�O oa S O � ° � 0 �o u1 a "lu' O of) O rrca ` Z."(-n vs' ' `t' dce, '� d' pZ o- ovW ° 'o i. retp 00, 2oO t 'o �� N dNOcpzu �z4.0 �oco z0 "' % vs oo ! 3. V ' O V \ q= �� oO v °% -d mo -' ty O Ovl Z 4C. --d CCE CO v I . Nz Zp �� m .0 a �� % ,za -Co OO 12:5 v� T �� C ° LU c� rCJ O s CI zo�o �, �� e i o dsu.. ri.. cc 1.1.1 z co, rJO ° .ii) - tow . . O Op = � 7o r s' cr, 6 ZZy O -,� �Aro e dTrr ~ O2Z 0 rcli ppcr) OV Y� m pr u-% 0 CO oZ� � r - vzo Zs III a.o r c� c� r J v- - Q.y r eL 1 �J \ (DZ ul Lu2 O ' J m Z , ) eL c, �.2 ZO r 0 J o c _ J uut v� O- 1 's' Z r j Z O 0 0 1 ``' 2 2 N d r 0 Q m , e.1 \ . N p 0 O N , O- , Z ., 1. �) O j v' 2t V Q� S O 2 V cn Z C_ d p T j G 0001 ti \� Z cr.?, '-im Q CO a jT • `� y: Zr SCC J Q d OQ ca Z \ :1 yr 0 R a sA, f' \\c- Act I- cos z Q 2 c T CO Iii T o Y o� 15.- G) d Z d Q i Z tQ CO 3 o co d Q- Z Z .� CV 0 y0 v � e -4 om94 O r r �Z n c�, m wm e Omv -f--)qZ cnp G o (i) -4O o0 --1 N Z 73 -to w m0 ,p..... 0 Q cm VI Z0 13, -n ro - w Dov TtQ O oo o � c o (D n y Zorn o- a Q- Z Zo Gi �� C o i � Q rn = 0O N m �� Nmoo N o *73 O � 70v 3 _ � 70 omZCO rrt �; 0.4 m ,-� O ril -� O Z Z o -§ 0 NC Nm � C) Z o O rrOZOZ Uo % p7, 0 o s r1Z.10 - 3 O o -{ oo3 -n -.. o U) 0OG eCC c- -4 oOA - �Z mo Q O rn �m y �Om, 0 e.Z y �� 73 - m cn 6, 0 m � • -b 1 m WI - --“en) —+ cIN k �c, -v 2 p O o� m N orri in p - rn 4. 0 7o m *c 73 37 rn N CA -A c 2 mS N (LI) u' c 0 �v Z [n �° Z rG =m 3� 0 v - -n `C 7o c\ % % m 0 � 0 CI 70oZ -t 0 Johnson Eric From: Frank Campoamor <frankcampoamor@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 5:55 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: Opposition Letter- Hamilton Place RPUD Dear Mr. Johnson, I am a property owner in the adjoining neighborhood, Brynwood Preserve(12856 Brynwood Way, Naples, FL 34105). I live there year-round and work full-time in Naples. I am very concerned about the effects that Hamilton Place will have on the existing, adjoining neighborhoods and traffic on Livingston Road. 1. It is already extremely difficult and dangerous to access Brynwood Preserve heading south on Livingston Road and having to do a U-turn at the median cut through where Positano Place and the back entrance to Kensington are located. It is already a mess, and I have seen road rage incidents occur with the existing 3 neighborhoods trying to use that median cut through.Adding a fourth neighborhood with 66 units,which could realistically mean another 100 cars, would be dangerous to the existing residents and unfair. 2.Then accessing Brynwood Preserve heading north on Livingston Road will be equally dangerous because the ingress and egress for Hamilton Place will be right next to where the turn in is for Brynwood Preserve.That is accidents waiting to happen. It is my understanding that entrances to neighborhoods need to be 660 feet apart.The proposed entrance for Hamilton Place will violate that ordinance because its entrance is less than 660 feet from the entrances of both Brynwood Preserve and Positano Place. 3.The proposed density is too great.The land under consideration is just too tight to put the density in there being proposed when you already have Brynwood Preserve to the north and Positano Place to the south. 4.The proposed vegetation barrier between Brynwood Preserve and Hamilton Place is wholly inadequate. Not only will it not act as a sufficient sound barrier,the proposed height of the structures will leave no privacy to our community and their community. Further,there should be more of a buffer distance between the homes in Brynwood Preserve and the residences proposed for Hamilton place. In my opinion,the vacant land between Brynwood Preserve and Positano Place is unfit for the development being proposed. It just does not make sense,will put the residents of the adjoining neighborhoods and general public using Livingston Road in danger from a traffic standpoint,and does not provide adequate barriers between the adjoining neighborhoods. Thank you for your consideration. Frank Campoamor Owner in Brynwood Preserve 1 Johnson Eric From: Frank Philipone <frankphilipone@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 5:55 PM To: JohnsonEric Subject: Fwd: ***Update to Hamilton Place Information*** Hamilton Place Dear Mr.Johnson, I am a homeowner in Andalucia and I writing this email to you regarding Hamilton Place. It is my understanding that an informational meeting regarding the project was held in October and at that meeting WCI agreed to limited the building height to 3 stories of less based on their approved height of 35'. However,they indicated that their approved density is 6.6 units per acre. It is my understanding that density is usually based upon neighboring developments. The purpose of this email is to request that this project be limited to no greater density than the highest maximum density of adjoining neighborhoods, which would limit it to 6 units per acre to match Arlington Lakes. If it is possible, I would prefer that it be limited to 3 units per acre to match our development. Please confirm that you have received this email and keep me apprised of any additional information as it becomes available regarding Hamilton Place. Kind regards 1 JohnsonEric From: Rumley,Jeffrey <JRumley@bcbsm.com> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 9:45 AM To: JohnsonEric Cc: paulg@sandcastlecm.com Subject: Hamilton Place RPUD-Dec 15th Hearing Good Morning Mr.Johnson: I am presently a Michigan resident with a seasonal home at Brynwood Preserve anticipating full time Florida residency. I am unable to be present at the scheduled Dec 15th hearing but wanted to take the opportunity to express a concern I have. One of the primary reasons I purchased a home in Brynwood was because of the privacy it afforded from adjacent properties.The preserve,of course, presents one insulator and there appears to be a sufficient barrier between our association's homes on the north side from the commercial properties at Pine Ridge and Livingston Rd. My concern is the sufficiency of the proposed barrier between Hamilton Place and the south side of Brynwood Preserve Association. The site plan provided by the builder makes reference to a "Type B" barrier. I do not know what that is and how it is distinguished from the Type A or D barriers proposed on the road side of Hamilton or the south side of Hamilton. In any event, a substantial part of the value proposition of Brynwood is the interior lakes and surrounding natural habitat. I do not object to the construction of tasteful residential units on adjoining property.What I do want to see though is an appropriately deep boundary that preserves as much as possible the natural surroundings.This is not only a value to the residents of Brynwood but also a value that should be recognized by putative purchasers of Hamilton Place residences. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Jeffrey Rumley 12858 Brynwood Preserve Lane The information contained in this communication is highly confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom this communication is directed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended receipt and delete the original message without making any copies. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network of Michigan are nonprofit corporations and independent licensees of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. 1 fix ei ®, I ? ....). N 14,„p::, - , n' Z1 /, .„,,,,t_„/' f HHIOi ' _: - x I C. -44;#..',,t,.',"••• ii' .'i.°,4$'-- --",„, #. „,,l, ' T kt,4 41 74 9 t j.: - avoHNoisoMnn , ___._-- . 1 ,,,4,_ i' Ai .1 ,,,„ 0„,,,, . - i 4'''': ''''',-"4 '` .. s yi Z E ' I m : pp 4; t r^.§ ., f 3 '. x a:, S o ©f .� I :I "1 er 4.. e sm -� x w y g4 2 S 4 � � k { 4X a � v .� K. ' _ rt ip i F:?. .' ' 5Kit #.� ”. k a + - t °r"- WM. --'14. *St '--- 40.• '4. —it 4,,.1,1 4 a -o 18 tit. E 'tit , , !A * ( i aro ' ,, ' P _ $ ash '� g .c _._.:...._.. ,ba....e,. :�as . ,..<sk.,.a..x.iM+ v ,f11�!€z =�+ " w'P�rbi. ? =.k "f-:,,,,:_- ''''''', ‘. 1 1 r , iii . , �0IIIIIII f ilk w I , . .it, i 9�1111111, „ _- 1 '1 */ I . *-1"""7".0,%. ' • Olt 4 "mow ,i ii, ,, ,, ..„'' -, _- .,.. , r _ . , 0. ,,,, ori ({ m R 1•�r I .0....; _ s © . ! !J � t (4 0 ° P H . ..• . • < LoIC''''":‘ 1 ' : i k , ., I 11 . - x d z£a $ 'fi4sar` 9— .i r-- -b.' i 3#�$a 1 Y1$ ,. .4., .44..4* ''''‘ '..., ---- :- ' .tkr. i.,., . r ,'...e it__ * „„_...„," A b � . i rd'' ak. ` ._ 4 a ,-,, , . 1,.j,,,,, 1,_ I ,a.,.,f*.tg *- ' .* . *41,,,:::Vt I'''. ' i 1 . . I 1_ ,,,g, , 44 __„ , ,.. k .: ,,,...„.7. , l rrirr ids -4:-...,„::,:_,S.,..„._±.--4. '*r-''''''''' w _ ,„,....,. „ . 6,...40t-t. , _!,,,_.8., o __zo$ .. w��wav P w�,,, —xw,ron P,KE Apuo m�o,so�o�zss�o,,.�n� ,,x,.zo,.z,ow a 1. --111iiiiii � m t11. ' zoilir}p ' ' x 0 �rE rrrrrrw� ; } q ' s t '515 .5554551555554i15.-- Baa . `w� ��" 555 55555555555555555„, 5,-,. 5s5.5155-5555555-15, 55.-. =,'- A,,,,,,.. ..•. `• h momil '�' a aka , � ff Vie$ ,. 44„ k Vgg ver,,,.. 9 $ { Y .. F .e .°°°°.:. F1 ,ttil ., x t m li 3 i--; - d 4q! t'L. . . i W.... , . . .... ..„,,,„,„,,,,•„„,„,„„,,,, ,,...„,,,,,..„ . Li „„:„..„,,,,..„,„,,,„„s„.„,....„.„.. „.,„,..,,,,....,„,„ this.:....,„...„,„,„„t„,,,,,,. ..„:„...s..„,,,,s . ; . , , ,, ., ....„—iii_ „, ,.• ,,,„,,,,i,..-„,.....,...„„s, ....„,. ,, • „„.„.....„„,,,,,,,,.....„.„„„..ss..„. .„... ..„.., yet mow, ,„„; .. . „ . „„:„...„,s,, . r„.„.„:„..„....„„:„.„.„.. „,,,:s„....,,,,, 't; . . , . a G h-- ..,s„. ,... . .,..,.., , .............,„..„,„ „ ” ... _ ,,,,....,,,,,,,,„,..s: ,,. ,...„.„,...„..s.„.„:„.7„,„ .„, ,— ( tZtZEi",!•;',.,E.--it.--tt"EA'..ttr•f"'s".M.?•,L"."•V--41'. '4''''.... .. —......,„Et El• 2 tiitI ift 1. ,.,....: Q y t P e tie De PPS Be �,.. vo," P`'-cf4 rV-t, ( 3P ) A up 1 cr 0.e y"; ' c PP pe ei lice- ( K ) K pi7) I' A K � PPP S � Hamilton Place PUD Adjacent Development Densities PUD Acres Dwelling Units Density Arlington Lakes 98.36 590 6 Brynwood Preserve 29.26 170 5.47 Kensington Park 370 570 1.54 a Related Group 39.5 276 6.99 ,re Whippoorwill Lakes 76.85 518 6.74 Whippoorwill Pines 29.54 180 6 Whippoorwill Woods 83.92 462 5.51 r. Summerwind 29.6 368 12.43 4 Cypress Glenn 29.70 208 7 Manchester Square 36.90 148 4 Temple Citrus Grove 132.68 512 3.86 Oak Grove 131.30 525 4 Vineyards 1,930.16 5,608 3.02 Citrus Gardens 98.6 396 4.01 Wilshire Lakes 246.41 552 2.24 Balmoral 58.95 236 4 Livingston Village 149 590 3.9 December 13, 2016 Page 1 of 1 GradyMinor co,a1.rszair„ .tsmid',un, ,or> #rann r, Lott ,..;apr ltrhaerTs 18A Monday,November 28,2016 Naples Daily News NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,December 15th,2016,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL.,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS HAMILTON PLACE RPUD TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 66 SINGLE-FAMILY AND/OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND SOUTH OF PINE RIDGE ROAD IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.75+/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20160001255] Pine Ridge RD cc 1-75 a 0 O a Green BLVD C PROJECT en LOCATION Cr) ,J s All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,December 15th, 2016. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252- 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman November 28,2016 ND-1368601 ccpc December 15, 2016 Ord. Amending Ord. 04-41 LDC Amendments COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA * 4 REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS 4OfI `, To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: X Normal legal Advertisement ❑ Other: (Display Adv.,location,etc.) Originating Dept/Div: Operations and Regulatory Management Person:Caroline Cilek,LDC Manager Date: Thursday,November 17,2016 Petition No.(If none,give brief description): N/A r)120 l41M /U11I vv&& 02.0 zcOC—q( - Petitioner: (Name&Address): N/A Name&Address of any person(s)to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed,attach separate sheet) See Above Hearing before BCC BZA Other: CCPC Requested Hearing date: Thursday,December 15,2016 Notice to run:Monday,November 28,2016 Notice to run not later than:Monday,November 28,2016 Newspaper(s)to be used: (Complete only if important): X Naples Daily News ❑ Other X Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include Title of the Ordinance/Resolution(or just write in see attached document),legal description,common location&size): Please see attached legal ad. Please publish the following public notice in your edition on Monday, November 28, 2016. Please furnish proof of publication of each advertisement to the Collier County Growth Management Department, Division of Zoning and Land Development Review, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104, Attention: Caroline Cilek Companion petition(s),if any&proposed hearing date: N/A Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? El Yes ❑ No If Yes,what account should be charged for advertising costs: Department: Land Development Services,Zoning Review Section; Fund&Cost Center: 131-138909-634999;Purchase Order Number: 450063; Account Number: 068779 P.O.#45001.6313 Reviewed 4:11-0C) Divisioi dministrator or Dc4gnee Date List Attachments: Legal Ad.Proposed Ordinance to be furnished closer to the hearing date. DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved,be sure that any necessary legal review,or request for same,is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: El County Manager agenda file: to ❑Requesting Division ❑ Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office,retaining a copy for file. *********************************************************************************************************** FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: / Date Received: f (�' Date of Public hearing: 1a//5---- b Date Advertised: /t 2, November 17, 2016 Naples Daily News 1 100 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34110 ATTENTION: LEGAL ADVERTISING Please publish the following public notice in your edition on Monday, November 28, 2016. Please furnish proof of publication of each advertisement to the Collier County Growth Management Division, Department of Zoning and Land Development Review, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104, Attention: Caroline Cilek. NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE Notice is hereby given that on Thursday, December 15, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Building"F,"Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, the Collier County Planning Commission will consider amendments to the Collier County Land Development Code. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. The title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: CHAPTER TWO - ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES, INCLUDING SECTION 2.03.06 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS; CHAPTER FIVE - SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS, ADDING SECTION 5.05.15 CONVERSION OF GOLF COURSES; CHAPTER SIX - INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING SECTION 6.05.01 WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS, ADDING SECTION 6.05.03 STORMWATER PLANS FOR SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, TWO-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AND DUPLEXES; SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; SECTION FIVE, INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND SECTION SIX, EFFECTIVE DATE. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendments are available for public inspection in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section, Growth Management Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Suite 401, Collier County Government Center, East Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112- 5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioner's Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman Acct. #068779 November 18, 2016 Attn: Legals Naples Media Group 1100 Immokalee Road Naples, Florida 34110 Re: Amending the Collier County LDC Dear Legals, Please advertise the above referenced notice Monday, November 28, 2016 and send the Affidavit of Publication, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk P.O. #4500172052 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE Notice is hereby given that on Thursday, December 15, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Building "F," Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, the Collier County Planning Commission will consider amendments to the Collier County Land Development Code. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. The title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: CHAPTER TWO — ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES, INCLUDING SECTION 2.03.06 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS; CHAPTER FIVE — SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS, ADDING SECTION 5.05.15 CONVERSION OF GOLF COURSES; CHAPTER SIX — INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING SECTION 6.05.01 WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS, ADDING SECTION 6.05.03 STORMWATER PLANS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, TWO-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AND DUPLEXES; SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; SECTION FIVE, INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND SECTION SIX, EFFECTIVE DATE. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed amendments are available for public inspection in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section, Growth Management Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Suite 401, Collier County Government Center, East Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioner's Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain, Chairman Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S. Vergara Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 9:45 AM To: Legals NDN (legals@naplesnews.com) Subject: LDC Amendments Attachments: LDC Amendments (CCPC 12-15-16).doc; LDC Amendment (CCPC 12-15-16).doc Hello, Please advertise the following attached ad Monday, November 28, 2016. Please forward an ok when received, if you have any questions feel free to call me. Thanks, Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Dept. Clerk of the Circuit Court & Value Adjustment Board Office: (239) 252-7240 Fax: (239) 252-8408 E-mail: martha.vergarana collierclerk.com 1 Martha S. Vergara From: Gori, Ivonne <Ivonne.Gori@naplesnews.com> Sent! Friday, November 18, 2016 10:54 AM To: Martha S. Vergara Subject: RE: LDC Amendments Confirmed receipt. From: Martha S.Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 9:45 AM To: NDN-Legals<legals@naplesnews.com> Subject: LDC Amendments Hello, Please advertise the following attached ad Monday, November 28, 2016. Please forward an ok when received, if you have any questions feel free to call me. Thanks, Martha Vergara, BMR Senior Clerk Minutes and Records Dept. Clerk of the Circuit Court & Value Adjustment Board Office: (239) 252-7240 Fax: (239) 252-8408 E-mail: martha.vergara@collierclerk.com Please visit us on the web at www.collierclerk.com This electronic communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient,you must not copy,distribute or take any action induced by or in reliance on information contained in this message. Unless expressly stated,opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Clerk's Office by emailing helpdesk(@collierclerk.com quoting the sender and delete the message and any attached documents.The Collier County Clerk's Office accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the CollierClerk.com domain. Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Martha S. Vergara From: ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 1:57 PM To: Martha S. Vergara Cc: Ivonne Gori Subject: Ad: 1368126, NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINAN Attachments: BCCZONING D-94-1368126-1.pdf Attached is the document you requested. Please review and let us know if you have any questions. Thank you. Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist Naples Daily News/USA Today Network 0: 239.213.6061 F: 239.263.4307 E:ivonne.gori@NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 1 ,. > Ad Proof .tu Sales Rep:Ivonne Gori(N9103) Phone:(239)262-3161 Email:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com –"""1111=111=11111r " —111111111111111=11111111V--- Date: 11/18/16 This is a proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates indicated below. Account Number:505868(N068779) Please confirm placement prior to deadline by contacting your account rep at(239)262-3161 Company Name:BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT Ad Id:1368126 P.O.No.: Total Cost:$339.29 Contact Name: Email:martha.vergaragcollierclerk.com Tag Line:NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINAN Address:3299 TAMIAMI TRL E#700,NAPLES,FL,34112 Start Date: 11/28/16 Stop Date: 11/28/16 Phone:(239)774-8049 Fax:(239)774-6179 Number of Times: I Class: 16180-Notice Publications:ND-Naples Daily News,ND-Internet-naplesnews.com I agree this ad is accurate and as ordered. NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE Notice is hereby given that on Thursday,December 15,2016,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,3rd Floor, Building"F,"Collier County Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,Florida 34112,the Collier County Planning Commission will consider amendments to the Collier County Land Development Code.The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m.The title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,BY PROVIDING FOR:SECTION ONE,RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: CHAPTER TWO-ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES,INCLUDING SECTION 2.03.06 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS:CHAPTER FIVE-SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS, ADDING SECTION 5.05.15 CONVERSION OF GOLF COURSES; CHAPTER SIX - INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING SECTION 6.05.01 WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS,ADDING SECTION 6.05.03 STORMWATER PLANS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, TWO- FAMILY DWELLING UNITS,AND DUPLEXES;SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY;SECTION FIVE,INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE;AND SECTION SIX,EFFECTIVE DATE. All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed amendments are available for public inspection in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section,Growth Management Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida,between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.,Monday through Friday. Furthermore,materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor, Suite 401,Collier County Government Center,East Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples, FL 34112-5356 (239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioner's Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman November 28,2016 No 1368126 Thank you for your business. Our commitment to a quality product includes the advertising in our publications. As such,Gannett reserves the right to cat- egorize,edit and refuse certain classified ads.Your satisfaction is important. If you notice errors in your ad,please notify the classified department immedi- ately so that we can make corrections before the second print date. The number to call is 239-263-4700. Allowance may not be made for errors reported past the second print date.The Naples Daily News may not issue refunds for classified advertising purchased in a package rate;ads purchased on the open rate may be pro-rated for the remaining full days for which the ad did not run. Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S. Vergara Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 2:04 PM To: Rodriguez, Wanda (WandaRodriguez@colliergov.net); Ashton, Heidi; CilekCaroline (CarolineCilek@colliergov.net) Subject: LDC Amendments Attachments: BCCZONINGD-94-1368126-1.pdf Hi All, Attached is the CCPC ad proof from NDN for the LDC Amendments. Please review and let me know of any changes needed. Thanks, Martha Martha S. Vergara From: Rodriguez, Wanda Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 2:49 PM To: Martha S. Vergara Cc: FrantzJeremy; Cilek, Caroline; Ashton, Heidi; Stone, Scott Subject: RE: LDC Amendments Martha, Scott Stone has reviewed the proof and states that it is correct, and no map is needed for this ad. OK to proceed. "Wanda Rodriguez, MCP .Advanced Certified ParaCega( Office of the County Attorney (239) 252-8400 From: CilekCaroline Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 2:33 PM To: RodriguezWanda; AshtonHeidi Cc: FrantzJeremy Subject: RE: LDC Amendments Looks OK to me. Caroline Cilek, M.S.,AICP, CFM Land Development Code Manager Land Development Code & Floodplain Management Sections Collier County Growth Management Department 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Direct Phone: 239-252-2485 Flood Information Hotline: 239-252-2942 From: Martha S. Vergara [mailto:Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 2:04 PM To: RodriguezWanda <WandaRodriguez@colliergov.net>; AshtonHeidi <HeidiAshton@colliergov.net>; CilekCaroline <CarolineCilek@colliergov.net> Subject: LDC Amendments Hi All, Attached is the CCPC ad proof from NDN for the LDC Amendments. Please review and let me know of any changes needed. Martha S. Vergara From: Martha S. Vergara Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 2:57 PM To: 'ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com' Subject: RE: 1368126, NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINAN Hi Ivonne, The Legal department has reviewed and approved this ad. Please proceed with publishing as requested. Thanks, Martha ----•-Original Message From: ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com [mailto:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 1:57 PM To: Martha S. Vergara <Martha.Vergara@collierclerk.com> Cc: Ivonne Gori <ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com> Subject: Ad: 1368126, NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINAN Attached is the document you requested. Please review and let us know if you have any questions. Thank you. Ivonne Gori I Legal Advertising Specialist Naples Daily News/USA Today Network 0: 239.213.6061 F: 239.263.4307 E:ivonne.gori@NaplesNews.com A: 1100 Immokalee Road I Naples, FL 34110 1 4r ?'ap1rø ar WS NaplesNews.com Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT 1368126 NOTICE OF INTENT TO Pub Dates November 28,2016 iG21 (Sign ure of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me I •,..►�°Mi�►;;;�irv. IVONNE GORI This Decembe 01,2016 + Notary Public State of Florida ` • 1 Commission 0 FF 900870 �_44 I ,,f `"�0My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 • n.ua•• Banded through National Notary Assn. (Signatur of affiant) ' Naples Daily News Monday,November 28,2016 730 Nets ii y Notice.To Creditors [loth,To Creditors Notice To Creditorsthe Collier Nolicc Tn Cr c llnrir� The this 4 day of[November of which is 3315 Tamiami Trail Naples Florida 34102 THOMAS S.GETTY,JR. Persons Giving Notice: `1•e+`e 2016. East,Suite#102,Naples,FL Telephone:(239)262-7748 PAMELA JANE MCCASSEV THOMAS S.GETTY. Dwight Brock,Clerk 34112-5324.The names and Facsimile:((239)22-7144 f/k/a PAMELA JANE GETTY PAMELA JANE MCCASSEV sell ng of Circuit Court addresses of the personal THOMAS S. GETTY, JR, f/k/a PAMELA JANE GETTY to L7ViJ1lL� Collier County,Florida(SEAL) representatives estaI epresentative's PATRICIA A.WHEELER resentative PAMELA JANE MCCASSEV c/o A.ERIC ANDERSON,P.A. Novembe7,Marilyn4,2111well&28,2016 below' are set forth %o A.ERICrsonal HANDERSON,P.A. CO-TRUSTEE PAMELA JANE GETTY, Zaa Fifth Avenue South,Suite `T0 car No.1342238 All creditors of the 350 Fifth Avenue South,Suite c/o A.ERIC ANDERSON,P.A. Naples,Florida 34102 J decedent and other persons 200 350 Fifth Avenue South,Suite November 21&28,2016 starts Naples,Florida 34102 NO.1368250 ITKFl6r1L'TWQ having claims or demands 200 Notice Ot Side against decedent's estate. November 28 and December 5, Naples,Florida 34102 2016 No.1375696 �t NOTICE OF PUBLIC on whom a Copy of this notice ALL INTERESTED 'phere'snoplaoellkehmel 1 , here SALE: DEALER'S CHOICE s required to be served must 16-2416-CP PERSONS ARE NOTIFIED THAT: TRANSPORT,LLC gives Notice file their Claims with this IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR All creditors of the estate of Naples Daily News Localfieds of Foreclosure of Lien and court WITHIN THE LER OF 3 COLLIER COUNTY, the decedent and persons intent Foreclosure sell these vehicles MONTHS AFTER THE TIME OF FLORIDA PROBATE DIVISION having claims or demands Wheels/Recreation intent to sell these a 6203 THE FIRST PUBLICATION OF File No.16.2416-CP against the estate Other Public Notices JANES LN NAPLES,FL 34109- THIS NOTICE OR 30 of the decedent other than 6228,pursuant to subsection DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF IN RE:ESTATE OF MARY JANE those for whom provision for PHYSICIAN RETIREMENT 713.78 of the Florida SERVICE OF A COPY OF THIS GETTY,Deceased. full payment was made in the Statutes. DEALER'S CHOICE NOTICE ON THEM. Order of Summary NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, TRANSPORT,LLC reserves the All other creditors NOTICE TO CREDITORS Administration must file their pursuant to §456.067, Fla. accept or reject any of the decedent and other (Summary Administration) claims with this court WITHIN Stat.(2014)and Rule 6468- right right toall bids. persons having claims or THE TIME PERIODS SET FORTH 10.002.F.A.C.,that Martin F. demands against decedent's TO ALL PERSONS HAVING FLORIDAON 733.702 OF THE the MD is retiring from 4F4ZR36V6XTM31741 1999 estate must file their claims CLAIMS OR DEMANDS FLORIDPROBATE CODE. the practice of medicine with MAZDA with this court WITHIN 3 AGAINST THE ABOVE ESTATE: ALL CLAIMS AND Florida Cancer Specialists, November 28,2016 No.1373847 MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF You are hereby DEMANDS NOT SO FILED WILL P.L., d/b/a Florida Cancer THE FIRST PUBLICATION OF notified that an Order of BE FOREVER BARRED. Specialists & Research THIS NOTICE. Summary Administration has NOTWITHSTANDING Institute, effective as of Notice T<:Creditors ALL CLAIMS NOT been entered in the estate of ANY OTHER APPLICABLE TIME December 19.2016,and that FILED WITHIN THE TIME MARY JANE GETTY,deceased, PERIOD, ANY CLAIM FILED Florida Cancer Specialists 16-2363-CP PERIODS SET FORTH IN File Number 16.2416-CP; by TWO (2) YEARS OR MORE & Research Institute has IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR SECTION 733.702 OF THE the Circuit Court for Collier AFTER THE DECEDENT'S DATE been designated as records Placeour COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROBATE CODE WILL County,Florida, OF DEATH IS BARRED. owner;thus,any requestsby Y FLORIDA PROBATE DIVISION BE FOREVER BARRED. Probate Division,the address The date of first publication patients for copies Of medical ad online at records No.16-2363-CP NOTWITHSTANDING of which is 3315 Tamiami Trail of this Notice is November can be made directly THE TIME PERIOD SET FORTH East,Suite#102,Naples,FL 21,2016. to Florida Cancer Specialists IN RE:ESTATE OF JAMES M. ABOVE, ANY CLAIM FILED 34112-5324;that Attorney for Persons Giving &Research Institute at 9776toCGilfieds WHEELER TWO(2) YEARS OR MORE the decedent's date of death Notice: Bonita Beach Road, Suite Deceased. AFTER THE DECEDENT'S DATE was September 9,2016;that A.ERIC ANDERSON 201A,Bonita Springs,FL 34135. OF DEATH IS BARRED. the total value of the estate is Attorney for Petitioners November 21, 28 and Reach the locals! NOTICE TO CREDITORS The date of first $57,108.75,and that Florida Bar No.0322865 December 5&12,2016 publication of this notice is the names and addresses of A.ERIC ANDERSON,P.A. No.1365793 The administration November 28.2016. those to whom it has been 350 Fifth Avenue South,Suite of the estate of JAMES M. assigned by such order are: 200 Notice Ci Sale Neticc Of Stile WHEELER,deceased,whose A.ERIC ANDERSON Creditors: Naples,Florida 34102 date of death was February 11, Attorney for Personal NONE Telephone:(239)262.7748 NOTICE OF SALE 2016;File Number 16-2363-CP, Representative Beneficiaries: Facsimile:(239)262-77144 is pending in the Circuit Court Florida Bar No.0322865 Notice is hereby given pursuant to Chapter 83 of Florida Self for Collier County,Florida, A.ERIC ANDERSON,P.A. Is' Storage Facility Act that Prime Storage-Marco Island-840 E Probate Division,the address 350 Fifth Avenue South,Suite --,142111•11111Elkcam Cir,Marco Island,FL 34195 will sell the contents of the NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING following units online at www.iBid4Storage.com for:CASH only, AVE MARIA STEWARDSHIP COMMUNITY DISTRICT f payment i5 not received. Sale ends:Wednesday,December 7,2016 10::00am. NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE The Regular Meeting of the Board of Supervisors(the NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE "Board")of the Ave Marla Stewardship Community District #M131A-Glenn Tiger-Plastic Tote,Tool Boxes,Basket Balls, is scheduled to be held on Tuesday.December 6,2016,at Bags,Radio,Shoes Notice is hereby given that on Thursday,December 15,2016,in 9:00 a.m.at the Ave Maria Master Association located at #M33113-Theresa Foster-Ladder,Plastic Totes,Shop Vat, the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,3rd Floor, 5076 Annunciation Circle,Suite 103,Ave Maria,Florida 34142. Keyboard,Floor lack,bags,umbrella,boxes Building"F."Collier County Government Center,3299 Tamiami The meeting is open to the public and will be conducted in Trail East,Naples,Florida 34112,the Collier County Planning accordance with provisions of Florida law for independent Owner reserves right to bid at sale,reject any/all bids,cancel Commission will consider amendments to the Collier County special districts.A copy of the agenda for this meeting may be or adjourn sale.All purchased goods are sold"as is".For more Land Development Code.The meeting will commence at 9:00 obtained from the District's website or by contacting the District detais or to pre-register go to http://wwfor more age.co . a.m.The title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: Manager,Specialeach tlDistrict Services,Inc.,2501A Burns Road,Palm Any partieshavingan interest in said units,for more information AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY Boll free at 1.877-737-4922.a 410 ThisrmeetinIg m561-630-4922 y bei continued toor or to make a Novembers 21&20,2016 may call 239.394.3334 No.1349985 COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, date,place and time certain,to be announced at the meeting AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41,AS AMENDED, There may be occasions when one or more Supervisors will P,IIb.ii:No:ices Public Notices THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,W HICH participate by telephone. INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, Any person requiring special accommodations at this FLORIDA,BY PROVIDING FOR:SECTION ONE,RECITALS; meeting because of a disability or physical impairment should Notice is hereby given that the Naples Planning Advisory SECTION TWO,FINDINGS OF FACT;SECTION THREE, contact the District Manager at 561-630-4922 and/or toll free at Board will hold a meeting beginning at 8:30 a.m.,Wednesday, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTSTOTHE LAND DEVELOPMENT 1-877-737-4922 at least forty-eight hours prior to the meeting.If December 14,2016 in City Council Chambers,735 Eighth Street CODE,MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: you are hearing or speech impaired,please contact the Florida South,Naples,Florida,34102. CHAPTER TWO-ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES,INCLUDING Relay Service at 1-800-955-8770,for aid in contacting the District SECTION 2.03.06 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Office. The public hearings to be considered at that meeting are: DISTRICTS;CHAPTER FIVE-SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS, ADDING SECTION 5.05.15 CONVERSION OF GOLFCOURSES; Each person who decides to appeal any action taken CONDITIONAL USE PETITON 06-CUB CHAPTER SIX - INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS at these meetings is advised that person will need a record of A Resolution determining Conditional Use Petition 16-CU8 AND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS, the proceedings and that accordingly,the person may need to pursuant to Section 58303 to allow a drive up window for a bank INCLUDING SECTION 6.05.01 WATER MANAGEMENT ensure that a verbatim record of the record of proceedings is on property located in the HC Highway Commercial District at REQUIREMENTS,ADDING SECTION 6.05.03 STORMWATER made,including the testimony and evidence upon which such 4501 9th Street North. PLANS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS,TWO- appeal is to be based. Petitioner: Bank of America FAMILY DWELLING UNITS,AND DUPLEXES;SECTION FOUR, Location: 4501 9th Street North CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY;SECTION FIVE,INCLUSION Meetings may be cancelled from time to time without Agent: Richard Hernandez IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE;AND advertised notice. SECTION SIX,EFFECTIVE DATE. CONDITIONAL USE PETITION 16-CUIO Todd Wodraska A Resolution determining Conditional Use Petition 16-CU10 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies District Manager pursuant to Section 50-104 to provide for a parking needs Of the proposed amendments are available for public inspection analysis for the Park Shore Plaza within the Park Shore Planned in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section,Growth AVE MARIA STEWARDSHIP COMMUNITY DISTRICT Development on property owned by Brixmor Park Shore SC LLC Management Department,2800 N.Horseshoe Drive,Naples, and located at 4135 through 4251 9th Street North. Florida,between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.,Monday www.avemariastewardshipcd.org Petitioner: Brixmor Property Group ' through Friday. Furthermore,materials will be made available Novemberr 28 28,2016 No.1371624 Location: 4135 through 4251 9th Street North for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor, - - Agent: CPH,Inc.,Joshua Lockhart,P.E. Suite 401,Collier County Government Center,East Naples,one Notice Nellce week prior to the scheduled hearing. CONDITIONAL USE PETITION 16-CUt1 FLORIDA PACE FUNDING AGENCY A Resolution determining Conditional Use Petition l If you are to participate with a disability who needs any accommodation NOTICE OF INTENT TO USE UNIFORM METHOD OF pursuant to Section 58-904(20)to allow the storage,cleaning in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at COLLECTING NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS and maintenance of rental vehicles on property owned by John no cost to you,t0 the provision of certain assistance.Please R.Nocera,Trustee of the John R.Nocera Revocable Trust dated contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, The Board of Directors(the"Board")of the Florida PACE Funding September 5,1991 and located at 967 4th Avenue North. at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356, Agency(the"Agency"),hereby provides notice,pursuant to Petitioner: Interlake Gulf Corporation,a Florida (239)252.8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted Sections 163.08(4)and 197.3632(3)(a),Florida Statutes,of its Corporation listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the intent to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem Location: 967 4th Avenue North Board of County Commissioner's Office. assessments for more than one year to be levied within every Agent: John M.Passidomo Commission county in Florida,including the area encompassed by the Collier County Planning Mark Strain,Chairman boundaries of Florida,r County,Florida,Nassau County,Florida, DEVELOPMENT ORDER 16-D0l Gadsden County,y.FloJefferson County,Florida,Gulf County, A Resolution determining petition 16-D01 to adopt a Development NOveMber 28.2016 NO1108126 Florida,Walton County,Florida Clay County,Florida,Pasco Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as Nnlir, Notir,' County,Florida,Marion County,Florida,Jackson County,Florida, The Commons consisting of 52 acres on property owned by Charlotte County,Florida,Osceola County,Florida,Suwannee Commonage Corporation and Commons II Land Partnership and County,Florida,Eya County,Florida,Broward County, located at 870,850,840,820,750,Goodlette-Frank Road North. NAPLES RESERVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Florida,Alachua County, Florida, Brevard County, Florida, Petitioner: Commonage Corporation and Commons II NOTICE OF LANDOWNERS'MEETING AND ELECTION Miami-Dade County,Florida,Orange County,Florida,Palm Land Partnership Beach County,Florida,the City of Kissimmee,Florida,the City of Location: 870,850,840,820,750 Goodlette-Frank Notice is herebygiven to the public and all landowners within Tamarac,Florida,the City of Pompano Beach,Florida,the City Road North Naples ReseryCommunity Development District in Collier of Pembroke Pines,Florida,the City of Hollywood,Florida,the Agent: John M.Passidomo County,Florida advising that a meeting of landowners will be City of Margate,Florida,the City of Punta Gorda,Florida,the i held for the purpose of electing three(3)people to the District City of Lauderhill,Florida,the City of Boynton Beach,Florida, REZONE PETITION 16-R6 Board of Supervisors. the City of Riviera Beach,Florida,the City of Orlando,Florida, An Ordinance rezoningpprely 11.5 acres from PD. the City of Winter Park,Florida,the City of Miami Beach, Planned Development to PD,Planned Development,specifically DATE: December 19,2016 Florida,the City of Satellite Beach,Florida,and any additional affecting a 2.12 acre parcel within the PD known as the North TIME: 11:00 a.m. counties or municipalities of the State of Florida subsequently Central Parcel"by reducing the commercial square footage PLACE: Coleman, vich&Koester,P.A. subscribing to the Agency's statewide program for the financing from 61,740 to 1,800 and adding 86 residential multi-family units Northern Trustrust Bank Building of the cost of providing energy conservation and efficiency for property located at 1333 3rd Avenue South,owned by Arthur 4001 Tamiami Trail N.,Suite 300 improvements, renewable energy improvements and wind L.Allen. Naples,Florida 34103 resistance improvements in accordance with Section 163.08, Petitioner: Planning Development Inc. Florida Statutes(collectively,the"Qualifying Improvements"). Location: 1333 3rd Avenue South Each landowner may vote in person Or by written proxy.Proxy The non-ad valorem assessments contemplated by thisnotice Agent: Michael R.Fernandez,RA AICP forms may be obtained upon request at the office of the District are voluntary and are only imposed by the Agency with th the Manager,Wrathell,Hunt and Associates,LLC,2300 Glades Road, prior written consent of affected property owners who wish to REZONE PETITION 16-R7 Suite 410W,Boca Raton,Florida 33431,(561)571-0010. At said obtain financing for Qualifying Improvements from the Agency. An Ordinance rezoning approximately 5 acres from PD,Planned meeting,each landowner or his/her proxy shall be entitled The Board will consider the adoption of a resolution electing Development to PD,Planned Development,to add specific to nominate persons for the position of Supervisor and cast to use the uniform method of collecting such assessments as permitted uses including residential at 12 units per net acre with one vote per acre of land,or fractional portion thereof,owned authorized by Section 197.3632,Florida Statutes,at a public associated development standards customized to context and by him/her and located within the District for each person hearing to be held at 1:00 p.m.EST,December 13,2016,at the existing conditions to remain for property located at 704/708 nominated for the position of Supervisor.A fraction of an acre River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization Executive Goodlette Road North,owned by Arthur L.Allen. shall be treated as one acre,entitling the landowner to one vote Conference Room,2570 W International Speedway Boulevard, with respect thereto.Platted lots shall be counted individually Suite 100,Daytona Beach,Florida. Such resolution will state Petitioner: Planning Development Inc. and rounded up to the nearest whole acre. The acreage of the need for the levy and will contain a legal description of the Location: 704/708 Goodlette Road North platted lots shall not be aggregated for determining the number boundaries of the real property that may be subject to the levy. Agent: Michael R.Fernandez,RA AICP Of voting units held by a landowner or a landowner's proxy.At Copies of the proposed form of resolution are on file at the office the landowners'meeting,the landowners shall select a person of CounterPointe a Energy Solutions,FL,Third Party Administrator VARIANCE PETMON 16-V15 to serve as the meeting chair and who shall conduttthe meeting. for the Florida PACE Funding Agency,6401 Congress Avenue, A Resolution determining Variance Petition 16-V15 to allow a sign Suite pre 200,Boca Raton,Florida.An interested persons are invited to exceed the maximum allowable sign band and to allow a sign The landowners'meeting is open to the public and will be to present oral comments at the public hearing and/or submit within the archway of the courtyard where Section 58-1134(f) conductedin accordance with the provisions of Florida Law. written comments to the Board.Written comments should be allows a single external sign band or zone applied to the facade Theemeeting may be continued to a date,time,and place to be received by the Agency on or before December 6,2016. Any of each building not exceeding two feet in vertical dimension specified on the record at the meeting.There maybe occasions persons desiring to present oral comments should appear at the and consisting of letters applied directly on the facade of the hen Board Supervisors or District Staff may participate by public hearing. building on property owned by 365 Fifth Avenue South Holdings, speaker telephone.A copy of the agenda for the meeting may LLC and located at 365 Fifth Avenue South. be obtained from the District Manager,Wrathell,Hunt and In the event any person decides to appeal any decision by the Petitioner: 365 Fifth Avenue South Holdings,LLC.c/o Associates,LLC,2300 Glades Road,Suite 410W,Boca Raton, Board with respect to any matter relating to the consideration of Edgewood real estate investment II,LLC Florida 33431,(561)571-0010. the resolution at the referenced public hearing,a record of the Location: 365 Fifth Avenue South roceeding may be needed and in such an event,such person Agent: Matthew Krogh,AIA,MHK Architecture& Any person requiring special accommodations at the meeting may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the public hearing Planning because of a disability or physical impairment should contact is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence on the District Office at(877)276-0889 at least forty-eight(48) which the appeal is to be based. ALL INTERESTED PARTIES ARE INVITED TO APPEAR AND BE hours prior to the meeting.If you are hearing or speech HEARD. impaired,please contact the Florida Relay Service by dialing In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 800.955-8770,for aid in contacting the District Office. and Section 286.26,Florida Statutes,persons with disabilities A • mon who deeid - •Hal an decision made b t needing special accommodation to participate in such public Boa wit respect to any matter con-mere•at tis canny wi A person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board hearing should contact the River to Sea Transportation Planning need a recrd of the ado which and may need o ensure that with respect to anywill need matter considered at the meeting is advised Organization at(386)226-0422 at least forty-eight(48)hours a verbatim record is made record includes the on that such person III need a record of the proceedings and that prior to the date of the public hearing. and evidence upon which the appeal is Be be heard.Any person accordingly rthe person may need,to ensure that a verbatim with a disability requiring auxiliary aids and services for this retard of tope proceedings is made,including the testimony and DATED this 16th day of November,2016. meeting may call the City Clerk's office1015 with requests evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. at least two business days before the meeting date. By Order of: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF FLORDA PACE FUNDING District Manager AGENCY James Kroll,Chairman Napes Reserve Community Development District NAPLES PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD November 28 and December 5,2016 No.1372418 November 21&28,and December 5&12,2016 No.1365203 November 28,2016 No.1376137 7 Z n CD 03 z0 0 3 = CO -< r N P. 2CD -< r0 m ce 0 = co 7J = Cm c 0 ° ,a CO r > Z C i-i's �7 r 55K r_ < x o• w,._� 3 nc, m g --71 z C j" 1\i_1 0O m z p Z m 16 l',o c 0 " 4 p co IT -•1 Z o mo z 7 G7 & 1 o D mm Zm cu' D p - 0O v --a m z con nip 00 CA.1030 > _4m g > rrn Zn D m 73 z CO � -n Z p =iR o .� 00 � Dop a c = = OC M = —+ -< Q g C2. m x ' (n m- 0 Ci3 O Opp 't1000 N O �' rr m73 m — 0 53 2 mD 3OM m r - Cr,, co < z 0 -I o o O m ---,z cn —i cn m mOO C > =mo a T -fl --IO � c~" o > �m � oo ' T2 mpry �3 'o i w Z o 0 0 O r x I ' 1 0n coW0� M zz Z -0z-+ o � D K D D -< C 1 - > rz v -I0m O 1 -c'. V) r -4 73 cn m � m 1 _ c% c- 13 > mD ---1 --I g D c- m � m O 0 D r.� x D ,- (n p "' D .J l_ �,.) lr. 0 =O XI � k` X D m M m7 --< W Z < z to OW -I mG0 V) c5 0 _0 O m = r mm -Z xi > m 73O > -< 0 p D = C ""I 70 p m < 2 i0 X m mm Fn C) I- m c > G-2. 73 0 z 2 G7 m Naples Daily News Monday, November 28,2016 13D, VI IDiuII, ti le auuI ebb JJV r11 UI nvcnu,. .,,.... _ NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE NOTICE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE Notice is hereby given that on Thursday,December 15,2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, 3rd Floor, Building "F," Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, the Collier County Planning Commission will consider amendments to the Collier County Land Development Code. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m.The title of the proposed ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY PROVIDING FOR: SECTION ONE, RECITALS; SECTION TWO, FINDINGS OF FACT; SECTION THREE, ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,MORE SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FOLLOWING: CHAPTER TWO-ZONING DISTRICTS AND USES,INCLUDING SECTION 2.03.06 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS;CHAPTER FIVE-SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS, ADDING SECTION 5.05.15 CONVERSION OF GOLF COURSES; CHAPTER SIX - INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING SECTION 6.05.01 WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS,ADDING SECTION 6.05.03 STORMWATER PLANS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, TWO- FAMILY DWELLING UNITS,AND DUPLEXES;SECTION FOUR, CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY;SECTION FIVE,INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE;AND SECTION SIX,EFFECTIVE DATE. All interested partiesareinvited to appear and be heard--Copies of the proposed amendments are available for public inspection in the Zoning and Land Development Review Section, Growth Management Department, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore, materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Suite 401, Collier County Government Center, East Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,, at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioner's Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark Strain,Chairman November 28,2016 No 1368126 p , Cfrr County Growth Management Division 2016 Land Development Code Amendments Cycle CCPC 12/15/16 Agenda Item 9-B Cote County Growth Management Department Development Review Division December 7, 2016 Dear Planning Commissioners, There are two LDC Amendments for your review and consideration at the December 12, 2016, meeting: 1. LDC section 6.05.01 & 6.05.03 Stormwater Management (New Section). This amendment expands the requirement for a stormwater plan to all new buildings, additions, or redevelopment of single-family dwellings,two-family dwellings, and duplexes (with some exceptions).The amendment also modifies the design requirements for stormwater plans. 2. LDC sections 2.03.06 & 5.05.15 Golf Course Conversions (new section). This amendment follows Board direction and introduces a new LDC section to address the conversion of golf courses to non-golf uses. The amendment establishes a new public outreach process and design standards for the proposed development to provide compatibility with existing residential uses. After completing research on golf course conversions across the nation and Florida, staff prepared a report for the Board with research findings and recommendations on LDCAs.The report was accepted the report on Tuesday, September 27th.The report can be on the LDC Amendment webpage: www.colliergov.net/currentldcas . There are two other amendments in this cycle, changes to 2.03.09 Open Space Zoning District and 3.05.07 Preservation Standards,which will be prepared and provided to you for your review on January 5, 2017. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the proposed changes to the LDC amendment request. Sincerely, Caroline Cilek carolinecilek@colliergov.net (239) 252-2485 eluN Development Review Division•2800 North Horseshoe Drive•Naples,Florida 34104.239-252-2400 •www.coKiergov.net Text underlined is new text to be added Strikethrough text is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term LDC Amendment Request ORIGIN: Growth Management Department AUTHOR: Growth Management Department Staff DEPARTMENT: Growth Management AMENDMENT CYCLE: 2016 LDC Amendment Cycle LDC SECTION(S): 6.05.01 Water Management Requirements 6.05.03 Stormwater Plans for Single-Family Dwelling Units, Two-Family Dwelling Units, and Duplexes (new section) CHANGES: This amendment expands the requirement for a stormwater plan for all new buildings, additions, or redevelopment of single-family dwellings, two-family dwellings, and duplexes. Currently, only those lots that exceed the maximum lot coverage or impervious area are required to submit a stormwater plan. This amendment removes the maximum lot coverage, requires a stormwater plan on all lots and increases the impervious area thresholds for when an engineered plan is required. Exceptions to the requirement for stormwater plans are provided for lots in the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district that are outside the coastal urban area and Immokalee urban area, and for lots within a project that has been permitted by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) for Surface Water Management or Environmental Resource Protection. The amendment establishes two types of stormwater plans as described in Tables 1 and 2 below: Table 1. Type I Stormwater Plans. Required for: Type I Stormwater Plans shall demonstrate: Lots with 40 percent or less impervious area. 1. The direction of stormwater discharges. Lots in the Estates district with 25 percent or less impervious area. 2. Compliance with design standards for Lots in RSF-1 or Rural Agricultural retaining walls, French drains, stormwater (A) districts in the urban area with 30 pipes, gutters and downspouts. percent or less impervious area. Lots that discharge directly into a 3. The location, dimension, and setbacks of waterbody that is downstream of the septic systems, if applicable. last control structure (regardless of impervious area). 2 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Bold text indicates a defined term Table 2. Type II Stormwater Plans. Required for: Type II Stogy nwater Plans shall demonstrate: Lots with more than 40 percent 1. Compliance with all Type I Stormwater impervious area. Plan criteria. Lots in the Estates district with more 2. Water quantity calculations to than 25 percent impervious area. accommodate the runoff from the area Lots in RSF-1 or Rural Agricultural exceeding the Type II Stormwater Plan (A) districts in the urban area with thresholds from a 5-year 1-day storm. more than 30 percent impervious 3. A matrix of all required separation area. distances between wells, drainfield Lots that discharge directly into a systems, and stormwater waterbody that is upstream of the last retention/detention areas. control structure (regardless of 4. Certification of compliance by the impervious area). engineer. Additionally, the amendment establishes Type I and Type II Stormwater Plans as the tool for demonstrating compliance with Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances section 90-41 (f)(8). A new application process for stormwater plans is also established in the Administrative Code. REASON: History The current standards in LDC section 6.05.01 F were created in 2007 to address impacts associated with large homes on small lots in conventional zoning districts. At that time, it was determined that lots exempt from obtaining a SFWMD permit were designed to accommodate a typical amount of lot coverage or impervious area. Therefore, it was determined that when a large home exceeds the typical lot coverage or impervious area for that neighborhood, the home may result in impacts to neighboring properties or the local stormwater system. As a result, a requirement to provide a stormwater plan was established to address stormwater runoff from lots with a greater than average percentage of lot coverage or impervious area. In 2013, the Development Services Advisory Committee (DSAC) reviewed the stormwater plan requirements in this section. At that time, they identified that the maximum lot coverage and impervious areas are disproportionately limiting on Estates lots and recommended that an LDC amendment address the lot coverage and impervious area thresholds. The amendment was then added to the prioritized list of LDC amendments and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Following DSAC's discussion of these standards, staff conducted additional research and found several other areas for improvement in the current program as described in the following sections. Staff Research Staff analyzed data from lot coverage reviews that occurred during a one-year period from June 2015 to June 2016. Staff members who regularly perform lot coverage reviews also identified common problems with stormwater plan submittals and the current standards. As a result, staff has 3 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikcthrough tcxt is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term proposed changes to address not only disparities in the current thresholds, but also to resolve several issues related to other elements of stormwater plans: Thresholds Analysis of the current thresholds confirmed that the maximum lot coverage and maximum impervious area percentages do not apply consistently as lot sizes increase. Additionally, this analysis has demonstrated that the percentage of lot coverage/impervious area allowed is inconsistent once lot sizes exceed 53,000 square feet. Figure 1 demonstrates how the allowed lot coverage and impervious areas change as lot sizes increase. For small lots, the maximum allowed lot coverage begins at 25 percent and the maximum allowed impervious area begins at 40 percent. However, larger lots are limited to a maximum lot coverage and impervious area of less than 5 percent. Figure 1. Percent of Allowed Lot Coverage and Impervious Area at Varying Lot Sizes. —Percent of Impervious Area Allowed —Percent of Lot Coverage Allowed 45% 40% 35% 0 30% I J 6 25% C C I u 20% O1 °- 15% 10% 5% 0% 0 C 0 0 0 Q §Q 0 8 `C 0 0 0 0 Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co Co C0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C0 0 0 0 0 0 m a a o uu' C u' n n C u' Cu' Cu'O M N Cu' uN cN uN cN Nui N N N N o cN N $ Cu'"v-1NNNN Nc Nui Lot Size(Square Feet) Common problems LDC section 6.05.01 F is intended to address impacts associated with stormwater runoff flowing onto neighboring properties. However, the current standards do not adequately protect against the possibility for stormwater impacts. For properties that do not exceed the existing thresholds, no review is performed when improvements are made to the property to ensure stormwater does not flow to neighboring properties. However, even lots with a low percentage of lot coverage and impervious area have the potential to impact their neighbors through site grading changes, slopes or new structures near the property line, and other site features. For lots that exceed the existing lot coverage or impervious area thresholds, while retention or detention of stormwater is required, the current standards still do not adequately protect against the possibility for stormwater impacts. There are no criteria related to berms or slopes near the impacted area and there is no requirement for runoff to physically connect to the retention area. This means that although a retention area may be provided, there is no guarantee that the retention captures any of the runoff from impervious areas on site or that other site features won't result in a change in flow patterns and create stormwater impacts on neighboring properties. 4 I:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikcthrough text is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term Moreover, there are some types of impervious surfaces that are not required to obtain a permit and therefore may not be counted toward the maximum impervious area. However, any impervious surfaces still have the potential to change stormwater runoff patterns. Exemptions Several exemptions are provided in the current standards. One of these allows an additional 3 percent (up to a maximum of 1,000 square feet) lot coverage or impervious area for first time additions only. However, this additional lot coverage is not exempt during subsequent additions. This means that if a stormwater plan is required for future additions,retention will then be required for the area that was previously exempt from the standards. Another exemption applied to lot coverage and impervious area reviews is for additions less than 400 square feet. Additions less than 400 square feet are not reviewed, even when the maximum lot coverage or impervious area has already been exceeded. The nexus for both of these exemptions is not clear and they could allow for stormwater impacts to occur, therefore, there are no size exemptions in the proposed amendment. Approval process Lot coverage and impervious area calculations are currently only required when on site retention is required. As a result,property owners submitting a building permit may not be aware how much impervious area is on their lot until they have exceeded the thresholds. This can make thoughtful planning of the lot difficult for property owners. This difficulty is compounded when separate permits for a home and pool are submitted simultaneously. In some cases, one permit may indicate a stormwater plan is required,while the other does not. This can be confusing for property owners and again makes planning the development of the lot unpredictable. With this in mind, staff believes the current process does not effectively communicate stormwater plan requirements to property owners. For these reasons, the proposed amendment more clearly defines when stormwater plans are required, how they should be prepared, and other procedural considerations. The new Administrative Code section proposed in Appendix A is also intended to more clearly define the approval process for stormwater plans. Other communities Staff reviewed lot coverage and stormwater management requirements for single-family dwellings, two-family dwellings, and duplexes in 15 other communities and municipalities throughout Florida. Three characteristics of stormwater management were common in other communities: 1. Maximum lot coverage percentages and stormwater management applicability is based on zoning districts, rather than lot sizes, in nearly all communities reviewed. 2. When stormwater management is required, standards are established for all lots,rather than just those exceeding the maximum percentage of lot coverage or impervious area. 3. Other communities do not allow lots to exceed lot coverage or impervious area maximums. As a result of this review of stormwater management in other communities, it is proposed that the thresholds that require a stormwater plan now apply differently to several zoning districts. This 5 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikethrough text is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term change reflects differences in land use and development trends in each district. Additionally, due to this review and other staff findings described above, it is proposed that stormwater plans are required for all lots, with some exceptions. Proposed Standards Over the course of six Development Services Advisory Committee-Land Development Review (DSAC-LDR) Subcommittee meetings in 2016, staff collaborated with subcommittee members and stakeholders to review the current standards, identify goals for the amendment, and develop the standards included in this amendment. The following sections describe the changes proposed in this amendment. Goals of the current amendment Based on DSAC's 2013 input and the findings in the additional research outlined above, staff identified several goals for the current amendment: • Eliminate the inequity of the current applicability thresholds. • Provide better justification for the standards. • Provide stormwater management for runoff on all lots. • Create a program that is more predictable for property owners and increase communication between reviewers and applicants. These goals are aimed at preventing detrimental impacts both on site and on adjacent properties and will apply stormwater management standards more fairly throughout the entire county. Applicability This amendment maintains the current applicability to all lots with single-family and two-family dwellings, and duplexes. The current exemption for lots with a permit from the SFWMD for surface water management or environment resource protection is maintained, however, an exemption is added for non-urban agriculturally zoned lots. Stormwater plans are currently only required when the lot coverage or impervious area exceeds the thresholds in Table 6.05.01 F. This amendment removes Table 6.05.01 F and adds a requirement for one of two types of stormwater plans for all lots, based only on impervious area thresholds specific to each zoning district. The characteristics of each stormwater plan are described in more detail in Tables 1 and 2 above, and the following sections. This change is made in response to staff's experience that drainage issues are not only associated with a high percentage of impervious area. Staff has found that due to updated building requirements,new construction is required to use more fill to build to a higher flood elevation than in the past. In these cases, the fill pad, slopes, and other site grading can have an impact on a neighborhood's drainage patterns even when the total impervious area is low. Therefore, a stormwater plan is necessary on all lots to ensure that drainage from new homes or additions does not create detrimental impacts on the subject property or adjacent properties. However, the requirements for stormwater plans for lots with low impervious area is designed to be less onerous than for lots with high impervious area. Therefore, a Type I Stormwater Plan is established for lots with relatively lower impervious areas and a Type II Stormwater Plan is established for properties 6 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikethrough text is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term with high impervious areas to ensure stormwater runoff does not result in detrimental impacts on site or to adjacent properties. Plan submittal Property owners will continue to submit stormwater plans concurrently with a building permit, consistent with the current submittal requirements. The stormwater plan submittal process is also described in more detail in the proposed Administrative Code section in Appendix A. Stormwater plan thresholds The proposed amendment uses impervious area thresholds to determine whether a Type I or Type II Stormwater Plan is required. In urban areas,where lot sizes are typically small, the DSAC-LDR Subcommittee found that the current threshold for lots under 11,000 square feet is appropriate for the urban area and, based on staff's research, ensures that a majority of property owners in the urban area will not exceed the threshold. As a result, a Type I Stormwater Plan is required for lots with 40 percent or less impervious area and a Type II Stormwater Plan is required for lots with more than 40 percent impervious area. On lots in Estates zoning districts, where the DSAC-LDR Subcommittee found that the current impervious area thresholds are disproportionately limiting, a Type I Stormwater Plan is required for lots with 25 percent or less impervious area and a Type II Stormwater Plan is required for lots with more than 25 percent impervious area. Currently many lots in the Estates are required to provide a stormwater plan with lot coverage and impervious areas of less than 10 percent. The DSAC-LDR Subcommittee reviewed staff's research and aerials of existing sites in the Estates and determined that lots with 25 percent or less impervious area represent appropriate impervious areas for Estates lots and should not require stormwater calculations. On lots in RSF-1 zoning districts and Rural Agricultural (A) zoning in the urban areas, a Type I Stormwater Plan is required for lots with 30 percent or less impervious area and a Type II Stormwater Plan is required for lots with more than 30 percent impervious area. This threshold reflects that RSF-1 lots and Rural Agricultural (A) zoned lots in the urban areas are frequently larger than other typical urban lots and sometimes have unique infrastructure constraints. Finally, lots that discharge directly into a waterbody downstream of the last control structure may submit a Type I Stormwater Plan regardless of the impervious area on the lot. These waterbodies are uncontrolled and tidally affected, therefore, discharges will not result in stormwater runoff impacts to neighboring properties. However, for lots discharging directly into a controlled waterbody, upstream of the last control structure, a Type II Stormwater Plan must be submitted, regardless of the impervious area on the lot. These discharges have the potential to impact neighboring properties or the stormwater system and require some retention or detention before discharging into the waterbody. Criteria for Type I Stormwater Plans: Lots required to submit a Type I Stormwater Plan have a comparatively lower percentage of impervious area. As a result, Type I Stormwater Plans are the least complex type of stormwater plan. These plans are required to demonstrate that stormwater will be directed to appropriate 7 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikethrough text is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term locations without impacting neighboring properties. While on-site retention may be provided on lots with a Type I Stormwater Plan, no on-site retention is required. The Type I Stormwater Plan criteria allow for a wide range of methods to address stormwater. On some sites, the stormwater plan may require more drainage infrastructure to direct stormwater to appropriate locations, while other sites may simply require grading of the site to meet the stormwater plan criteria. As a result, the amendment allows either a Florida registered design professional(such as architects,landscape architects,or engineers), a certified contractor,or owner builder to design the stormwater plan. Type I Stormwater Plans are required to demonstrate: • The direction of stormwater discharges. This criterion ensures that stormwater runoff is directed away from neighbors and allows stormwater runoff to discharge to one or more of the following: o An existing surface water management system.- o A drainage conveyance system, such as swales or underground storm sewer systems. o On-site retention or detention areas. o A waterbody downstream of the last control structure. • Outfalls to a waterbody must also demonstrate that they will not result in erosion of soil, and if an orifice is used, will be allowed through a minimum 3-inch orifice. Also, the soil adjacent to the discharge area shall be stabilized. • Compliance with several design standards. o Retaining wall setbacks. To allow for maintenance of retaining walls, a six-inch setback from the property line is required. o Retention calculations for French drains. When French drains are used, a 40 percent void ratio shall be used in retention calculations. o Stormwater pipe specifications. If used, stormwater pipes shall not be metal. This standard is intended to prevent pipe installations with relatively short life spans. o Gutter and downspout standards in 6.05.01 C. This requirement ensures that downspouts are not pointed toward neighboring properties when a structure is located 10 feet or less from a property line. It should be noted additional requirements for downspouts can be found in Florida Statutes Chapter 381.0065(4)(s), which also requires that downspouts are directed away from the septic system drainfield, if one is located on the property. • The location, dimension, and setbacks of septic systems. If a septic system is present or proposed on the property, this criteria ensures that the design and location of stormwater management and septic systems is coordinated throughout the development of the property. Criteria for Type II Stormwater Plans: Lots that are required to submit a Type II Stormwater Plan have comparatively higher percentages of impervious area and may require a more detailed design. These plans are also required to 8 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikcthrough text is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term demonstrate that stormwater will be directed to appropriate locations without impacting neighboring properties. Due to the increased complexity of Type II Stormwater Plans and the requirement for volumetric calculations for a design storm, this amendment requires that Type II Stormwater Plans shall be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Florida. Type II Stormwater Plans are required to demonstrate: • Compliance with all Type I Stormwater Plan criteria. The Type I Stormwater Plan criteria are designed to ensure stormwater runoff does not impact neighboring properties. These criteria also apply to Type II Stormwater Plans. • An engineer's analysis including: o Water quantity calculations for a 5-year, 1-day storm event (the same design storm event used in the current standards). Retention for the storm event is required for the impervious area in excess of the thresholds for Type II Stormwater Plans only. The DSAC-LDR Subcommittee determined that this storm event provides adequate protection when applied to the area exceeding impervious area thresholds. There is no requirement for water quality calculations included in this standard. o A matrix of all required separation distances. This requirement will ensure that the location of wells, drainfield systems, and stormwater retention or detention areas are coordinated. • Certification of Compliance. The engineer is required to submit a certification of compliance prior to inspections. Stormwater plans will be inspected during the 800 series inspections for building permits. This is the same process used to inspect current stormwater plans. Application requirements Application requirements for stormwater plans are established in the Administrative Code and are designed to ensure that staff is provided with enough information to determine that appropriate methods are used to direct discharge off site or to retain water on site. Inspection and maintenance The proposed amendment identifies an inspection schedule and maintenance requirements for stormwater plans. Stormwater plans will be submitted with the building permit and will be inspected by the County at the time of the building permit inspections and prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or certificate of completion, as applicable. Once approved, the property owner is responsible for maintaining the site grading and drainage (such as the swales, French drains, grates, etc.) in accordance with the approved stormwater plan. Since some types of site work and impervious surfaces are not required to obtain a permit,this section also notifies property owners that changes to the property, whether or not a permit is required, shall not modify the site in a manner that will prevent the site from continuing to drain in accordance with the approved stormwater plans. Violations 9 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikethrough text is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term The amendment also proposes to establish stormwater plans as the tool for demonstrating compliance with Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances section 90-41 (0(8)which states: "...Subsequent to the construction of a single-family residence on the respective lot (parcel of land), it shall be a violation of this article to cause `additional surface water' to run onto any real property owned by another landowner by filling,grading or otherwise raising the elevation of the respective water source single family residence lot..." Staff is frequently called upon to investigate stormwater management issues on lots that were developed prior to the establishment of the stormwater plan requirements. These types of violations occur for a number of reasons including the addition of fill or slopes near the property line. Therefore, this change will ensure that property owners and staff have a method to demonstrate compliance with the Code of Laws. DSAC-LDR SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: No changes, approved unanimously on 11/29/16. DSAC RECOMMENDATIONS: No changes, approved unanimously on 12/7/16. FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS: There are no anticipated fiscal or operational impacts associated with this amendment. RELATED CODES OR REGULATIONS: Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances section 90-41 (0(8) Florida Statutes Chapter 381.0065(4)(s) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: There are no anticipated Growth Management Plan impacts associated with this amendment. OTHER NOTES/VERSION DATE: Prepared by Jeremy Frantz, Senior Planner, 12/1/16. Amend the LDC as follows: 1 6.05.01 Water Management Requirements 2 A complete stormwater management system shall be provided for all areas within the 3 subdivision or development, including lots, streets, and alleys. 4 A. The system design shall meet the applicable provisions of the current County codes and 5 ordinances, SFWMD rules and regulations pursuant to Florida Statutes, and the Florida 6 Administrative Code, and any other affected state and federal agencies' rules and 7 regulations in effect at the time of preliminary subdivision plat submission. Water 8 management areas will be required to be maintained in perpetuity according to the 9 approved plans. Water management areas not maintained will be corrected according to 10 approved plans within 30 days. 11 B. Where stormwater runoff from outside the subdivision or development historically 12 passes on, over, or through areas of the subdivision or development, such runoff shall 13 be included in the stormwater system design. The system shall be designed for long life, 10 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikethrough text is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 low cost maintenance by normal methods and provide for optimal on-site detention of 2 stormwater runoff and groundwater recharge in accordance with applicable County and 3 SFWMD regulations. 4 C. Any structure with an outside wall which is closer than 10 feet from a side property line 5 shall install properly sized (minimum twenty-four-square inch cross-section) gutters and 6 downspouts to direct stormwater away from neighboring properties and toward front 7 and/or rear swales or retention/detention areas. 8 D. In-ground percolation type retention systems such as rock trenches, exfiltration trenches 9 or beds, infiltrator type systems, gallery type systems, etc., shall not be used to achieve 10 water quality retention for residential subdivisions. Rear yard open retention systems 11 shall likewise not be designed to achieve water quality retention on projects submitted 12 after January 1, 2002. All retention systems for projects designed after January 1, 2002, 13 shall be on common property owned and maintained by a homeowners' association or 14 similar entity. 15 E. Any canal which forms a part of the public water management system shall be dedicated 16 for care and maintenance per the requirements of the governmental agency which has 17 jurisdiction. Canals located entirely within the subdivision and which do not form a part 18 of the public water management system shall be dedicated to the public, without the 19 responsibility for maintenance, as a drainage easement. A maintenance easement, of a 20 size acceptable to the County Manager or designee or other governmental agency with 21 maintenance responsibility, shall be provided adjacent to the established drainage 22 easement, or the drainage easement created must be of a size suitable for the 23 proposed canal and its maintenance. 24 F. Stormwater Retention/Detention Design for Single Family Dwelling Units, Two Family 25 Dwelling Units and iplcxcs 26 1. Applicability. Any application for a building permit to allow the development or 2728 after July 1, 2008, except for the following conditions: 29 a. Any application within the boundaries of development projects that have: 30 {1) been permitted by the South Florida Water Management District for 31 32 (2) have a central surface water management collection, storage, 33 treatment and discharge system; 34 b. A one time addition is allowed for certain sized homes, as set forth below; 35 or 36 c. An application accompanied by a stormwater management plan, signed 37 - •- - - - - e - * .e. - ' - - .e.-- 38 Table 6.05.01 F. Lot Size Let-Coverage Under 11,000 sq. ft. 25% X10% 11,000 sq. ft. to 52,999 sq. ft. 2,750 sq. ft. +5% of area in /1400 sq. ft. +5% of area in and 100 ft. or greater in width excess of 11,000 sq. ft. excess of 11,000 sq. ft. 11,000 sq. ft. to 52,999 sq. ft. 2,750 sq. ft. +2% of area in /1,100 sq. ft. +2% of area in and less than 100 ft. in width excess of 11,000 sq. ft. exce c of 11,000 sq. ft. /1,850 sq. ft. +3% of area in 6,500 sq. ft. +2% of area in excess of 53,000 sq. ft. excess of 53,000 sq. ft. 39 40 2. The maximum allowable ratio of lot coverage and impervious area coverage to 41 the total lot area shall be as provided for in Table 6.05.01 F. unless accompanied 42 by an engineer's analysis as specified below. 11 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikethrough text is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 a. The site drainage analysis shall include water quality calculations to 2 - ' '' • -•-- e -•: - --- -- -- - - ee•- - ----••••ee. - 3 5 technician. If the site will use a drainficld/septic tank for sewage 6 7 must match that used for the drainfield design. 8 b. The application site plan shall list all required separation distances 9 - .. - - ' 10 _ _ ." -- -- - - -- - - - 11 separate Engineer's report, but must be signed and s alcd by the 12 Engineer. 13 c. The water surface ar a of swimming pools and ponds is not considered 14 as impervious area for the purposes of the calculations in Table 6.05.01 15 16 3. A one time addition to an existing residence will be allowed after July 1, 2008. 17 The addition will be limited to 3 percent of the lot area up to a maximum of 1,004 18 square feet as long as that one time addition does not exceed the ar a in Table 19 6.05.01 F. by more than 3 percent of the lot area or more than 1,000 square feet. 20 GF. The design of the stormwater management system shall fully incorporate the 21 requirements of the Interim Watershed Management regulations of LDC section 3.07.00. 22 14G. Street grades. Street grades must be determined in relation to the drainage facilities 23 for the subdivision and must not exceed four percent nor be less than 0.3 percent, 24 unless otherwise approved by the County Manager or designee pursuant to section 25 10.02.04 of the LDC. Street grades must be shown on the development plans by 26 direction and percent of fall on the road profiles. 27 1H. Rainfall and runoff criteria. The system must be designed for "design floods" resulting 28 from rain storms and antecedent conditions for all system components in accordance 29 with current Collier County and South Florida Water Management District criteria. 30 1. Runoff coefficients. Existing land usage will be considered for the selection of 31 proper runoff coefficients within the drainage basins involved, whether within the 32 subdivision or development or not. 33 2. Lakes. Artificial lakes and retention basins proposed as part of a stormwater 34 retention system for on-site water management must be designed and shall be 35 consistent with other ordinances or regulations of Collier County, the state or the 36 region. All lakes will be set back from abutting roadways or intersections 37 pursuant to the design standards established in sections 22-106 through 22-119 38 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances. 39 41. Stormwater outfalls. Stormwater runoff must be conducted to positive outfalls that can be 40 permanently maintained, practicably and legally. Outfalls to existing waterways, canals, 41 preserve or conservation areas, lakes or storm sewers will be acceptable provided it can 42 be demonstrated through a professional engineering study to the County Manager or 43 designee that such receiving systems have adequate capacity to receive the proposed 44 quantity and quality of the additional flow. 45 1. Side ditches or swales along public or private roads shall not be accepted as 46 suitable positive outfalls except as may be specifically accepted under the 47 provisions of the LDC by the County Manager or designee and by the Florida 48 Department of Transportation, if applicable. The storage of stormwater runoff in 49 other existing or proposed ditches or swales within a public or private right-of- 50 way will be permitted for volume storage when approved under South Florida 51 Water Management District design criteria, but will not be utilized to satisfy the 12 I:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikcthrough text is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 stormwater storage (quality) requirements of a development's master water 2 management system. 3 KJ. Major waterway. Improvement or establishment of major waterways and canals will be 4 developed in full accord with applicable stormwater management criteria. Engineering 5 data, criteria, and suitable calculations shall be submitted to the County Manager or 6 designee prior to approval of construction plans. 7 1. Roadways over major waterways will be structures approved by the County 8 Manager or designee, sized to maintain flow capacity, designed to assure long 9 life and minimal maintenance. Construction must meet all current Florida 10 Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge 11 Construction, as amended, unless otherwise approved by the County Manager or 12 designee pursuant to section 10.02.04 of the LDC. 13 LK. Outfall ditches and open channels. Unless otherwise approved by the County Manager 14 or designee pursuant to section 10.02.04 of the LDC, side slopes no steeper than four to 15 one will be allowed. Protection against scour and erosion will be provided as required by 16 the County Manager or designee. 17 ML. Roadside swales. 18 1. Design. In the interest of preserving the existing natural groundwater levels, 19 roadways will not be designed so as to cause the significant lowering of the water 20 levels existing in the area prior to development. Roadside swales and ditches 21 may be permitted within street rights-of-way where the use of roadside swales 22 can be justified to the County Manager or designee through a written report 23 prepared by the applicant's professional engineer. Swales, where permissible, 24 will have side slopes no steeper than four to one and they will not be utilized to 25 satisfy the stormwater quality (volume) requirements of a project's master water 26 management system. Where flow velocities in excess of four feet per second are 27 anticipated, urban right-of-way sections will be required. 28 2. Erosion protection. All unpaved areas within the permanent right-of-way must 29 be provided with permanent erosion protection, such as native vegetation or 30 turf. Swale ditches shall be sodded a lateral distance extending from the road 31 pavement to the top of the swale ditch backslope. Where valley guttered sections 32 are used for drainageways, turf protection must be placed from the edge of the 33 gutter to the outer limits of the right-of-way. If seeding is utilized, then mulching 34 in accordance with the Florida Department of Transportation standards will be 35 required. Additionally, if seeding and mulching are utilized, then a strip of sod one 36 foot wide will be placed along the face of the pavement or curb section and over 37 the invert of any approved swale section within the runoff flowway. All swales 38 subject to erosion velocities will have adequate erosion protection in the form of 39 riprap or other applicable like methods. 40 3. Driveways across swale ditches. Driveways across permitted swale ditches 41 must have placed beneath them drainage pipes of adequate size and type 42 approved by the County Manager or designee, based on the capacity 43 requirements calculated by the applicant's professional engineer for the 44 development's master water management system. 45 14M. Street drainage. Street drainage within the road right-of-way through grassed swales 46 will be permitted for rural cross sections only except where velocities in excess of four 47 feet per second are anticipated. The flow from these swales or other types of drainage 48 facilities will be diverted to natural percolation areas, artificial seepage basins or 49 artificial lakes of at least sufficient capacity to comply with the criteria of Collier County 50 and the South Florida Water Management District. Other equally effective methods of 13 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Bold text indicates a defined term 1 returning cleansed waters to the aquifer will be acceptable upon prior review and 2 approval by the County Manager or designee. 3 1. Existing natural lakes may be used as detention areas provided that they have 4 adequate storage capacity and that pretreatment measures approved by the 5 County Manager or designee are taken to prevent pollutant matter from entering 6 the lake. Positive outfall drainage facilities will be provided away from all 7 percolation areas, seepage basins, detention areas and artificial lakes to handle 8 the runoff from storms which exceed the required design storm event in duration 9 and/or severity. 10 8N. Percolation areas. The actual area required will depend on the percolation rate for the 11 soils at the specific site and the manner in which the site is developed in accordance 12 with Collier County and South Florida Water Management District criteria. 13 1. Underground drainage. Where drainage plans provide for, or it is so directed by 14 the County Manager or designee, the collection of stormwater in underground 15 pipes, inlets and other appurtenances for conveyance to an intermediate or 16 ultimate outfall, the following minimum design criteria will be observed: 17 a. The minimum pipe used within a publicly maintained stormwater 18 collection system will be 15 inches in diameter. 19 b. Inlets will be spaced at such intervals and in such a manner to allow for 20 the acceptance of 100 percent of the ten-year, one-hour storm runoff. 21 c. The distance between terminating and intermediate structures must not 22 exceed those required by the Florida Department of Transportation, 23 pursuant to Florida Department of Transportation Drainage Manual, 24 Volumes 1-4 (1987 edition or latest revision). 25 d. The stormwater, underground collection system, must be so designed 26 that the elevation of the hydraulic gradient during a ten-year, one-hour 27 storm event is never higher than the crown elevation of any publicly 28 maintained roadway in the system. 29 e. The pipes must be designed to minimize sediment deposits. 30 f. The pipe materials must meet the requirements set forth in sections 31 943-948 inclusive of the current edition of the Florida Department of 32 Transportation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. 33 Only concrete pipe or other pipe materials approved by the County 34 Manager or designee may be used in tidal or salt waters. 35 g. All drainage pipes must be fitted with headwalls, endwalls, inlets and 36 other appropriate terminating and intermediate structures. 37 PO. Stormwater disposal. The method of ultimate disposal of stormwaters will be dependent 38 upon the soil characteristic underlying the development or subdivision. All stormwaters 39 will be subjected to treatment for the removal of petroleum residues, oils, suspended 40 solids and other pollutants found in stormwater runoff. The method of treatment will be 41 determined by the applicant's professional engineer responsible for the preparation of 42 the stormwater management plans and specifications, and will be subject to the approval 43 of the County Manager or designee and the concerned state agencies. 44 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 45 46 6.05.03 Stormwater Plans for Single-Family Dwelling Units, Two-Family Dwelling Units, 47 and Duplexes 48 A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to manage stormwater runoff on lots with 49 single-family dwelling units, two-family dwelling units, or duplexes in order to 50 prevent detrimental impacts on site or to adjacent properties. This section is also 51 designed to provide criteria for demonstrating compliance with Collier County Code of 14 I:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikcthrough tcxt is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 Laws and Ordinances section 90-41(f)(8). For the purposes of this section, the term 2 impervious area shall include roofed buildings, concrete and asphalt pads, cool deck 3 (e.g. spraycrete), pavers with limerock base, swimming pools, and lined pond area. 4 Additionally, the term pervious area shall include grass, crushed stone (e.g. #57), 5 mulch, pavers without limerock base, and unlined pond area. 6 B. Applicability. A Type I or Type II Stormwater Plan shall be required for lots with single- 7 family dwellings, two-family dwellings, or duplexes with the following exceptions: 8 1. Lots located in the Rural Agricultural (A)zoning district outside the Immokalee 9 Urban Area Overlay district and outside the coastal urban designated area as 10 established in the Future Land Use Map. 11 2. Lots that have received a Surface Water Management or Environmental 12 Resource Protection permit from the South Florida Water Management District. 13 C. Stormwater plan submittal. A stormwater plan shall be submitted as part of an 14 application for a building permit for any of the following: 15 1. Type I Stormwater Plans. 16 a. New structures, additions, pools, or decks on lots with 40 percent or 17 less impervious area, or as described in the following zoning districts: 18 i. RSF-1 zoned lots with 30 percent or less impervious area. 19 ii. Rural Agricultural (A) zoned lots within the Immokalee Urban Area 20 Overlay district or within the coastal urban designated area as 21 established in the Future Land Use Map with 30 percent or less 22 impervious area. 23 iii. Estates zoned lots with 25 percent or less impervious area. 24 b. New structures, additions, pools, or decks on lots that discharge directly 25 to a waterbody downstream of the last control structure, whether or not 26 the lot exceeds the impervious area thresholds in LDC section 6.05.03 27 C.1.a above. 28 2. Type II Stormwater Plans. 29 a. New structures, additions,pools, or decks on lots with more than 40 30 percent impervious area, or as described in the following zoning 31 districts: 32 i. RSF-1 zoned lots with more than 30 percent impervious area. 33 ii. Rural Agricultural (A) zoned lots within the lmmokalee Urban Area 34 Overlay district or within the coastal urban designated area as 35 established in the Future Land Use Map with more than 30 36 percent impervious area. 37 iii. Estates zoned lots with more than 25 percent impervious area. 38 b. New structures, additions, pools, or decks on lots that discharge directly 39 to a waterbody upstream of the last control structure, whether or not the 40 lot exceeds the impervious area thresholds in LDC section 6.05.03 41 C.2.a above. 42 D. Stormwater plan criteria. 43 1. Type I Stormwater Plan. Type I Stormwater Plans shall be prepared by a Florida 44 registered design professional, licensed contractor or owner builder. The Type I 45 Stormwater Plan shall demonstrate the following: 46 a. Stormwater runoff. Discharges from the impacted area shall be directed 47 into one or more of the following: 48 i. An existing surface water management system 49 ii. A drainage conveyance system, such as swales or underground 50 storm sewer systems. 15 I:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikethrough text is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 iii. On-site retention or detention areas. The bottom of retention or 2 detention areas shall be above the wet season water table. 3 iv. A waterbody downstream of the last control structure. Stormwater 4 discharges to a waterbody shall not result in erosion of soil. 5 Discharges may be allowed through an orifice with a minimum 6 size of 3 inches and the soil adjacent to the discharge area shall 7 be stabilized. For lots discharging directly to waterbodies 8 upstream of the last control structure, see LDC section 6.05.03 9 D.2. 10 b. Design standards. 11 i. Retaining walls shall be set back six inches from the property line, 12 if applicable. 13 ii. Stone in French drains shall be calculated with a 40 percent void 14 ratio, if applicable. 15 iii. Stormwater pipes, if used, shall not be metal. 16 iv. Gutters and downspouts shall comply with LDC section 6.05.01 C, 17 if applicable. 18 c. The location, dimension, and setbacks of septic systems, if applicable. 19 2. Type II Stormwater Plan. Type II Stormwater Plans shall be prepared by a 20 professional engineer licensed in the state of Florida. The Type II Stormwater 21 Plan shall demonstrate the following: 22 a. Stormwater runoff. Discharges from the impacted area shall be directed 23 into one or more of the following: 24 i. An existing surface water management system 25 ii. A drainage conveyance system, such as swales or underground 26 storm sewer systems. 27 iii. On-site retention or detention areas. The bottom of retention or 28 detention areas shall be above the wet season water table. 29 iv. A waterbody. Stormwater discharges directly to a waterbody shall 30 not result in erosion of soil. Discharges may be allowed through 31 an orifice with a minimum size of 3 inches and the soil adjacent to 32 the discharge area shall be stabilized. 33 b. Design standards. 34 i. Retaining walls shall be set back six inches from the property line, 35 if applicable. 36 ii. Stone in French drains shall be calculated with a 40percent void 37 ratio, if applicable. 38 iii. Stormwater pipes, if used, shall not be metal. 39 iv. Gutters and downspouts shall comply with LDC section 6.05.01 C, 40 if applicable. 41 c. The location, dimension, and setbacks of septic systems, if applicable. 42 d. An engineer's analysis that demonstrates the following: 43 i. Water quantity calculations by a qualified engineer or technician 44 that demonstrate the ability to accommodate the runoff from the 45 area exceeding the applicable threshold in LDC section 6.05.03 C 46 from a 5-year 1-day storm. 47 ii. A matrix of all required separation distances between wells, 48 drainfield systems, and stormwater retention/detention areas. The 49 calculations may be done on the site plan or may be in a separate 50 engineer's report, but the site plan must be signed and sealed by 51 a professional engineer licensed in the state of Florida. 16 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added Strikethrough text is current text to be deleted Bold text indicates a defined term 1 e. A certification of compliance shall be submitted to the County by the 2 engineer prior to an inspection. 3 E. Application submittal requirements. The Administrative Code shall establish the 4 submittal requirements for stormwater plans. 5 F. Inspection and maintenance. 6 1. Inspection. The subject property shall be inspected by the County prior to 7 issuance of a certificate of occupancy or certificate of completion, as applicable, 8 for consistency with the approved stormwater plan. 9 2. Maintenance. The property owner shall maintain site grading and drainage (e.g. 10 swales, French drains, grates, etc.) in accordance with the approved stormwater 11 plan. Future changes to impervious area or site grading shall not modify the site 12 in a manner that will prevent continued drainage of the site as shown on the 13 approved stormwater plan, whether or not a permit is required for an 14 improvement. 15 G. Violations. Where a violation of Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances section 90- 16 41(f)(8) has been found by the Code Enforcement Board or Special Magistrate, a 17 stormwater plan shall be submitted that demonstrates the additional flow of surface 18 water has been eliminated. The subject property shall be inspected by the County to 19 determine if the violation has been resolved. 20 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 17 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\6.05.01 Lot Coverage\Drafts\6 05 01 Water Management Requirements 12-7-16.docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term Land Development Code Amendment Request ORIGIN: Board of County Commissioners AUTHOR: Growth Management Department DEPARTMENT: Development Review Division AMENDMENT CYCLE: 2016 LDC Amendment Cycle LDC SECTION(S): 2.03.06 Planned Unit Development Standards 5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Courses (new section) CHANGE: This amendment introduces a new section in the LDC to assess and mitigate the conversion of golf courses to a non-golf course use. LDC section 5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Courses contains two main elements. First, it requires the applicant to conduct public outreach to property owners within 1,000 feet of the golf course prior to submitting a conversion application to the County. The public outreach requirement, identified as Stakeholder Outreach Meetings, is intended to engage the property owners, hereafter referred to as "stakeholders," to cultivate consensus on the proposed development. Second,the section presents several design standards for the proposed development to support compatibility with the existing residential uses. The proposed standards take into account the large number and wide variety of golf courses in the County. See Attachment 1 for an overview of the golf courses across the County. See Tables 1-3 below for an overview of golf course statistics in the County. For the purpose of this LDC amendment staff did not include the golf courses located in the City of Naples or the City of Marco Island because they would not be subject to the County's conversion procedures. Some of the golf courses in the County are standalone facilities while others were developed as part of a residential project. Due to the large number and ranges in size, there is not a one-size- fits-all solution to development standards to address golf course conversion. Therefore, the stakeholder outreach process is integral to addressing the specific needs of the existing residential property owners and allows the applicant to vet alternative designs through a regulatory approach. Ultimately, the combination of design standards and community outreach is intended to provide compatibility for existing residential stakeholders regardless of the golf course layout. To assist with the public outreach requirement proposed by this new section, staff has prepared the Collier County Guide to Golf Course Conversions(Guide),which is a document created to outline different types of public outreach, such as focus groups, charrettes, polling, etc. that will provide the stakeholders and the applicant an understanding of what is required while conducting the outreach. The Guide will be adopted by reference. To support this section, three Administrative Code for Land Development sections will be prepared to support this new LDC section. Two of the Administrative Code sections will provide submittal requirements for new applications introduced in this section and the third section will provide standards and notice requirements for the Stakeholder Outreach Meetings. In addition, 18 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Conv.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Bold text indicates a defined term LDC section 2.03.09 Open Space Zoning Districts will be amended to introduce additional uses to the golf course zoning district and LDC section 10.03.06 regarding public notices will be updated to reflect new notice requirements established by this section. Table 1 ..-,.um,... .of.< . olf Courses s,. ,,. .,h,,,.. .... ..f. mss olf-MO les M Collje�i �..+ C`.:...' uli �,. Number of Courses Number of Holes on the Golf Course 3 9 58 18 5 27 11 36 Total 69 Note:The number of golf holes were identified by accessing golf club websites,GIS aerials,and by telephone conversation with the golf club administrative offices. Table 2 Golf Courses by Zoning District in Collier County Number of Golf Zoning District Courses Golf Course (GC) 9 Golf Course (GC) /RMF-6/RMF-16 1 Golf Course (GC) /RSF-3 1 PUD 47 RFMUD-PUD 3 RFMUD-A 1 RFMUD-A-CU 4 A-MHOI-RLSAO 1 RMF-16 1 PUD-RFMUD 1 Note:Golf courses zoning was confirmed using GIS aerials provided by the Collier County Property Appraiser and reviewing the County zoning maps.Golf courses zoned PUD were further verified by reviewing individual PUD ordinances. Table 3 Type of Courses by Acreage and Number in Collier County Acreage Range Type Number of Golf Courses 10-50 Par 3 - Driving Range 7 50-99 Executive 5 100-220 Championship or 45 240 or greater Regulation 20 Note:Utilized golf course acreage totals to determine golf course types.Muirhead,D.&Rando G. (1994)Golf Course Development and Real Estate.Urban Land Institute. It is important to note two caveats regarding the establishment of this LDC Amendment for the conversion of golf courses. First, the adoption and codification of LDC provisions for golf course conversion shall not imply that a golf course will receive approval from the Board to convert to a 19 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Cony.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term different use. Second, the proposed framework is a method to support community involvement and consensus building. However,the public participation and hearing processes will only provide steps to build consensus; the individual parties will dictate whether consensus may be achieved. REASON: Board direction This amendment follows Board direction on April 12th to pursue an LDC amendment to address golf course conversions. The Board discussed the following issues and concerns related to the existing residential property owners who live around the golf course(meeting minutes pg. 85-97): • The Growth Management Plan supports preserving open space areas and the loss of open space would negatively impact the community. • Open space can provide stormwater management for surrounding communities. • Property owners who purchased homes with a golf course view had an expectation the view was worth a monetary value and paid a premium price for their homes. They also experienced higher taxes compared to a home without a golf course view. • There will be a diminution of property values for homes located around the golf course if the green space is lost. • Providing more uses in the golf course zoning district that are compatible by right may mitigate the need to convert golf courses in the future. • Allowing for additional compatible uses in the golf course zoning district would inform future property owners with a golf course view that other uses are allowed, not just a golf course. • Require the property owner of the golf course to show they are no longer economically viable as a golf course. • Importance of involving the neighborhood in the conversion process. • Legal encumbrances on golf courses should be brought to light. In addition, it is important to note that golf courses are a local community asset. Golf courses provide neighborhoods with nearby social and recreational opportunities for family and friend outings, business networking opportunities, and places for high school teams to play, as well as bringing visitors to the county for professional tournaments. Further, golf courses provide open space within the built environment and are often a cornerstone of social interaction for surrounding neighborhoods. Following the April 12th meeting, the Board instituted a six month moratorium on the acceptance, processing, and consideration of applications for development orders involving the conversion of lands zoned for golf course use. On September 27, 2016, the moratorium was extended to April 11, 2017, to provide additional time to prepare and publically vet the proposed amendments. With the extension request staff presented research that had been conducted on golf course conversion across the state of Florida and the nation. The proposed amendment implements the concepts that were presented in the research paper. To review the research paper discussion points, please visit www.colliergov.net/currentldcas. The research on golf course conversions in Florida and the nation provided insight into what land use and planning principles supported the approval 20 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Cony.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Bold text indicates a defined term of a conversion project by a local jurisdiction. Staff found the projects that received approval had two overarching themes: some level of stakeholder participation and the developer maintaining an open space view for the existing residential property owners. The proposed amendment focuses on these two concepts. Purpose and intent of the golf course conversion section The purpose and intent of this amendment is to "assess and mitigate the impact of golf course conversions on real property by requiring outreach with stakeholders during the design phase of the conversion project and specific development standards to ensure compatibility with existing land uses."As discussed by the Board, the intention of the new requirement is to address concerns stemming from residential property owners purchasing a home along a golf course with the anticipation that the golf course would remain in perpetuity. Further,homes along golf courses are often purchased at a premium price due to the views from the house of the golf course. Moreover, many property owners may have purchased homes with the anticipation their real estate value would rise over time with open space view. Applicability of the golf course conversion standards The LDC amendment will apply to three scenarios, explained below. The golf course conversion section will not apply to courses repurposed for a different use listed in the permitted, accessory, or conditional uses in the Golf Course zoning district. This LDC section is also proposed to be amended to allow for other similar open space uses, such as hiking trails,walkways, and disc golf facilities. More intense uses, such as cemeteries and memorial gardens, museums, and ball courts (bocce ball, basketball, handball, pickle ball, tennis and racquetball) are proposed as conditional uses. Approval of Land Uses 1. A golf course located in any zoning district and where the property owner wants to convert to a non-golf course use that is not currently permitted, accessory, or conditional in the zoning district or tract. a. Example: A golf course is located in a PUD tract established for only a golf course, however, the property owner wants to build a residential development. In this case, the property owner would proceed with the conversion process and a PUDA. 2. A golf course within a Stewardship Receiving Area and where the property owner wants to convert to a use that is not currently permitted, accessory or conditional in a context zone (generally speaking a context zone is a zoning district in a Stewardship Receiving Area. See LDC section 4.08.07 J.2 d for a description). a. Example:A golf course is located in a Stewardship Receiving Area and the property owner seeks to build a commercial development, however, the Stewardship Receiving Area doesn't allow this use. In this case, the property owner would need to proceed with a Stewardship Receiving Area Amendment. Approval of compatibility measures 21 I:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Cony.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term 3. A golf course that allows for a non-golf course use by right and the property owner seeks to construct an allowed use. In this case, the design of the use would be reviewed for compatibility with the surrounding properties. a. Example: A golf course is zoned Rural Agricultural and the property owners seek to convert it to agricultural activities, e.g. livestock raising, then a compatibility design review application would be required. The application process for golf course conversions The proposed conversion process is structured to occur before a traditional land use petition process. See Figure 1 for a graphic representation of the process. This way, the stakeholders and the applicant are engaged in conversation early in the design process and hopefully the main goals of the project are aligned between the two parties prior to a rezoning, PUDA, Stewardship Receiving Area Amendment, or a compatibility review application is submitted to the County. Figure 1 Golf Course Conversion Process Approval Process Land Use Petition • Rezone Stakeholder Outreach Process • PUD Amendment 1. Pre-Application Meeting • SRA Amendment 2. Intent to Convert Application a. Mailed Notice Or 3. Stakeholder Outreach Meeting a. Mailed Notice Compatibility Review Process 4. Stakeholder Outreach Meeting Report provided for Approval Process • SDP Amendment • Construction Plans • Conceptual Plan Review The conversion process starts with the applicant requesting a pre-application meeting with County staff and submitting an Intent to Convert application to the County. One of the requirements of the Intent to Convert application is a mailed notice to all of the stakeholders informing them of the property owner's intention to convert the golf course to a non-golf course use. The mailed notice will give stakeholders awareness that a community outreach program exists and to look for subsequent letters regarding meeting times and locations. The Intent to Covert application must be deemed complete by County staff prior to conducting any Stakeholder Outreach Meetings. The Intent to Convert application requires the applicant complete the following: The first requirement is a title opinion or ownership encumbrance report establishing there are no encumbrances on the property that prevent the land from being developed as proposed. This will require due diligence on the part of the applicant prior to submitting the application. The burden 22 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Conv.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term is placed on the applicant, rather than staff,to determine if there are any restrictions on converting the property. The second requirement, the Developer's Alternative Statement, is designed to provide all parties the ability to consider alternatives for the golf course. At a minimum the following three alternatives must be considered: no conversion, County purchase, and a conceptual development plan. The three alternatives are not intended to be mutually exclusive; for example, all three alternatives could be part of a finalized development plan. The Developer's Alternative Statement plays an important role in allowing the property owner, the stakeholders, and the County to see how each option would play out. It should be noted that it is entirely feasible that a golf course may be profitable and still pursue a non-golf course use because converting the golf course will enable it to achieve the highest and best use of the property for the property owner. County staff recognize that it is within the bundle of rights as a property owner to sell and develop land within the parameters of county codes. As such, the development standards that are introduced in this section are vital to creating a compatible development with existing residential developments surrounding the golf course. Ultimately, the Developer's Alternative Statement is designed to encourage communication, cooperation, and consensus building between the applicant, the stakeholders, and the County. The third requirement is a general plan for the Stakeholder Outreach Meetings. The applicant will outline the public outreach methods that will be used to engage the stakeholders at the Stakeholder Outreach Meetings consistent with the Collier County Guide to Golf Course Conversions. Further, an overview of a web-based survey will be required to be approved by staff. All of the application requirements will be listed in the Administrative Code for Land Development's Intent to Convert and the Stakeholder Outreach Meeting sections. Stakeholder Outreach Meeting requirements Stakeholder Outreach Meetings are intended to provide open communication and feedback between the applicant and the stakeholders. Several SOM meetings are required so that the applicant is able to incorporate any feedback into the conceptual plans for the development. The internet provides the opportunity to reach out to more people which can benefit the applicant in better understanding the neighborhood, such as seasonal residents. For example, the requirement for the web based survey provides an opportunity for individuals who cannot attend the in-person Stakeholder Outreach Meetings to still participate in a constructive manner. The Stakeholder Outreach Meetings, which are facilitated by the applicant, are encouraged to be collaborative events where all parties cooperate. However, they will also serve to hold the stakeholders and applicant accountable for their actions. Should consensus not be achieved and either party pursue litigation, the Stakeholder Outreach Meeting requirements will be helpful in demonstrating that one or more of the parties was uncooperative or unreasonable. Similar to a traditional NIM,the SOMs will be recorded and commitments made by the applicant for the project will be included in subsequent reports. A County staff member will also be present. Following the Stakeholder Outreach Meetings, a report will be provided by the applicant to County staff The report has the primary goal of identifying and answering questions and concerns from 23 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Cony.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text ctrikcthrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term the stakeholders. It also supports a transparent process, benefiting the applicant and stakeholders —highlighting the importance of reasonable input by the stakeholders and reasonable incorporation of the input by the applicant into the conversion project. To do this, a point-counterpoint list, identifying the input from the stakeholders and identifying how and why reasonable input was or was not included in the conceptual plan will be helpful for the stakeholders, staff, and the decision makers so all understand the issues involved in the conversion project. Stakeholders will need to recognize it is important to support and participate in a collaborative process with the applicant. Should one development proposal not work out, there is a chance that another developer may pursue development of the golf course in the future and may not be as willing to compromise or be as collaborative as the initial development team. Stakeholders need to understand that land uses change over time and participating in the process will provide the best opportunity to be part of the outcome. Land Use Petitions Once the Stakeholder Outreach Meetings have been completed the applicant may proceed with a conversion application, such as a rezone, Planned Unit Development Amendment, Stewardship Receiving Area Amendments, or a compatibility design review. Staff Report Consistent with current land use petition procedures, County staff will prepare a staff report for the Planning Commission, and EAC as applicable, or Hearing Examiner and Board. In addition to existing requirements, the staff report will also address whether the applicant meets all the requirements in LDC section 5.05.15, whether the Stakeholder Outreach Meetings report and point-counterpoint list are accurate, and whether reasonable input from the stakeholders was included in the land use petition application. These additional criteria are designed to ensure consistency throughout the process. As such, the amendment requires that the Planning Commission and the Environmental Advisory Council, as applicable, consider the stakeholder engagement process and whether reasonable input was included in the proposed project. The provision calls special attention to the greenway design, as this is the most important compatibility measure introduced in the amendment. Additionally, attention should also be given to who can use the greenway as it is intended to provide passive recreational benefits and would be a great amenity for future residents of the once golf course land. Compatibility design review The compatibly design review process will be required when PUDs or other projects seek to use a non-golf course use that is permitted, accessory or conditional for the district or tract. The review of compatibly measures is designed to address situations where, for example, the permitted use was approved a long time ago and would be incompatible with residential development without appropriate measures in place. This process only requires the procedural components of LDC section 5.05.15; the design standards established in LDC section 5.05.15 G are not required (e.g. no greenway, stormwater required). The compatibility design review process does not address the proposed land uses as they are already allowed by right. The approval process for a compatibility 24 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Conv.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term design review application consists of a review and recommendation from the Office of the Hearing Examiner to the Board. Development standards for rezones,PUDA and Stewardship Receiving Area Amendments In addition to standard LDC development requirements, there are several new design standards introduced in this section. The design standards are supported by research from other jurisdictions that have also assessed the impacts from golf course conversions. The design requirements are not required for projects subject to the compatibility design review as the uses have already been established as a permitted, accessory or conditional use and can suggest their own compatibility measures to mitigate any impacts to existing surrounding property owners. Open space The first design standard requires that golf courses lands utilized to meet the minimum open space requirements for a prior project need to be either retained as open space and/or the plans updated to demonstrate an alternative method to meet the minimum open space requirements. For example, if a PUD establishes that 20 acres of the golf course was used to meet the 60 percent minimum open space requirement for a residential PUD, then 20 acres of the golf course would need to remain open space or the PUD amended to reflect other open space lands are available to meet the minimum requirement. Greenway The second design standard is the introduction of a greenway. A greenway is a continuous strip of undeveloped land that is set aside for passive recreational uses, including but not limited to: open space,nature trails,parks,playground,golf courses,beaches,disc golf courses,exercise equipment and multi-use paths. The greenway is designed to be a buffer along the perimeter of the proposed development and adjacent to the existing residential properties that line the golf course. The goal of the greenway is to provide an open space view for stakeholders and support existing wildlife habitat. A general overview of the details includes requiring that a minimum of 35 percent of the conversion project be dedicated as a greenway, with an average minimum width of 100 feet (no less than 75 feet at any one point). See Attachment 2 for a collection of aerials depicting a 100- foot greenway on several golf courses across the County. Existing trees and understory are meant to be retained in the greenway, however, they can be removed to accommodate a multi-use path or the like. This is intended to promote retaining the existing trees and understory that are currently within the viewshed of existing residences. Further, a tree count is provided to support a shaded area in the greenway. Another provision addresses walls and fences. A wall or fence is not required between the two developments,however,if a wall is desired by either party it will need to accommodate the movement of wildlife by providing habitat connectivity. The greenway may also play an important role in providing stormwater management for the existing and/or new development and the proposed code section supports this concept. However, the greenway is not intended to be made up entirely of lake area and a percentage cap is established to prevent the greenway from becoming a series of large lakes. 25 I:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Conv.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text ctrikcthrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term Standard preservation requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.05.07 will be required for any conversion project. Two supplemental provisions are introduced in the section to support the integration of preserves with the greenway. The first takes into account conversion projects that have isolated preserves that are less than 1/2 acre(including planted areas)which meet LDC section 3.05.07 A.4 and supports the ability to recreate the preserve areas in the greenway. In addition, to support the retention of existing preserves and the open space and habitat they provide, all preserves that were previously approved with the golf course shall be retained and 50 percent of the total acreage can be counted towards the required preservation amount if located in the greenway and made available for passive recreational uses allowed by the LDC. Stormwater and Floodplain compensation The provision also takes into account potential stormwater impacts. As discussed in prior reports provided to the Board, golf courses often provide stormwater management by design of the project or because over time they have provided that service to the neighboring land uses. The proposed standards would require a pre-versus post-development stormwater runoff analysis. The objective is to ensure that property owners that surround the golf course would not be adversely affected by additional stormwater runoff after the conversion of the golf course. Further, Floodplain compensation, a concept that requires offsetting any loss to flood storage capacity on a given project, may need to be addressed on a case-by-case basis. This may be particularly important if the golf course has flooded during past heavy rain events. Soil and/or Groundwater testing The LDC currently recognizes that golf courses apply chemicals to provide a level of service to customers and over time soil and/or groundwater may become polluted and needs to be mitigated prior to conversion. The proposed language closes a gap because the current standards do not address the full range of potentially harmful pollutants previously or currently used on golf courses, including petroleum products. Should any of the soil and groundwater sampling results exceed state standards, the County will notify the Department of Environmental Protection who oversees the mitigation requirements. Design standards for lands converted from a golf course The design standards are to be applied to any golf course that converts or to any use listed in the golf course zoning district. There are two design requirements, lighting and setbacks to apply. The goal of the lighting requirement is to reduce light pollution,by requiring lighting to be directed away from neighboring properties and to require light fixtures to be shielded to prevent glare and light trespass. This is intended to the benefit of the existing property owners, future property owners, and wildlife. For example, if walking paths with light poles were constructed in the greenway this provision would ensure there was no light pollution impacting the existing residential properties. The goal of the setback requirement is to ensure there is sufficient distance between the proposed use and existing property owners around the golf course. For example, if a golf course was repurposed to a disc golf course a minimum average 50 foot setback would be required to provide a buffer between the two uses. In another example, if the golf course was converted to residential 26 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Com.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term housing and an alternative design for the greenway was employed,there would still be a minimum average 50-foot setback applied to the new uses. DSAC-LDR SUBCOMMITEE RECOMMENDATIONS: The subcommittee reviewed the proposed amendment on November 3rd, November 16th, November 29th, and December 7th. The Subcommittee stated a fundamental objection to the imposition on property rights, that the current rezone process is sufficient for golf course conversion, and opposes the over-reach of the government and onerous process established in this amendment. However, if the amendment moves forward, the Committee provided the following comments: • The standard rezone process is sufficient for the conversion of golf courses. It is not necessary to require additional procedures or design standards. • The requirement to send mailers and engage stakeholders within 1,000 feet is not necessary. The 500 foot requirement/1,000 foot requirement established in the Administrative Code is sufficient. • Objects to the requiring an ownership encumbrance report from the applicant because the County does not enforce or abide by civil restrictions. • There is no need or benefit to requiring financial information from a property owner. It is within a property owners rights to develop his property without the government oversight of financial records or consideration. • There should be more flexibility with the design of the greenway. Logistically it may be very difficult to garner sufficient support from the stakeholders to get an alternative greenway approved by the Board. • Consider allowing a mailing instead of the NIM requirement during the rezone or PUDA requirement. The mailing would inform the stakeholders of any changes to the project and send them to a website where they could access materials for the rezone or PUDA. • Opposes the contemplation in the proposed text and findings that existing property owners that surround the golf course maybe able to use(e.g. walk,run, and play) on the greenway because it is not land they own or have a right to use currently. DSAC RECOMMENDATIONS: The Committee supported the recommendation of the DSAC- LDR Subcommittee on 12/7/16. FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS: There are no anticipated fiscal or operational impacts associated with this amendment. RELATED CODES OR REGULATIONS: None. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: There are no anticipated Growth Management Plan impacts associated with this amendment. OTHER NOTES/VERSION DATE: prepared by Caroline Cilek,December 1, 2016,December, 7, 2016. Amend the LDC as follows: 1 27 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Cony.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term 1 2.03.06 Planned Unit Development Standards 2 3 H. Conversion of Golf Courses. Golf courses within a PUD shall adhere to the process 4 established in LDC section 5.05.15 prior to converting to another use. 5 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 6 7 5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Courses 8 9 A. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section is to assess and mitigate the impact of 10 golf course conversion on real property by requiring outreach with stakeholders during 11 the design phase of the conversion project and specific development standards to 12 ensure compatibility with the existing land uses. For the purposes of this section, 13 property owners within 1,000 feet of a golf course shall hereafter be referred to as 14 stakeholders. 15 1. Stakeholder outreach process. The intent is to provide a process to cultivate 16 consensus between the applicant and the stakeholders on the proposed 17 conversion. In particular, this section is designed to address the conversion of 18 golf courses surrounded, in whole or in part, by residential uses or lands zoned 19 residential. 20 2. Development standards. It is the intent of the specific development standards 21 contained herein to encourage the applicant to propose a conversion project 22 with land uses and amenities that are compatible and complementary to the 23 existing neighborhoods. Further, the applicant is encouraged to incorporate 24 reasonable input provided by stakeholders into the development proposal. 25 B. Applicability. The following zoning actions, Stewardship Receiving Area Amendments, 26 and compatibility design review petitions, collectively referred to as "conversion 27 applications" hereafter, shall be subject to LDC section 5.05.15. A conversion application 28 shall be required when an applicant seeks to change a developed golf course to a non- 29 golf course use. However, where a permitted, accessory, or conditional use is sought 30 for a golf course zoned Golf Course and Recreational Uses (GC), the applicant shall be 31 exempt from this section except for LDC section 5.05.15 H. 32 1. Zoning actions. This section applies to a golf course developed in any zoning 33 district for a use that is not currently permitted, accessory, or conditional in the 34 zoning district or tract for which a zoning change is sought. 35 2. Stewardship Receiving Area Amendments. This section applies to a golf course 36 developed on lands within a Stewardship Receiving Area for a use that is not 37 currently permitted, accessory, or conditional in the context zone for which the 38 change is sought. 39 3. Compatibility design review. This section applies to a golf course developed in 40 any zoning district or designated as a Stewardship Receiving Area that utilize a 41 non-golf course use which is a permitted, accessory or conditional use within 42 the existing zoning district or designation. Permitted conditional uses shall also 43 require conditional use approval subject to LDC section 10.08.00. 44 C. Application process for conversion applications. 45 1. Intent to Convert application. The applicant shall submit an "Intent to Convert" 46 application to the County prior to submitting a conversion application. The 47 following is required of the applicant: 48 a. Application. The Administrative Code shall establish the procedure and 49 application submittal requirements, including: a title opinion or ownership 50 encumbrance report establishing there are no encumbrances on the 51 property that prevent the land from being developed as proposed; the 28 I:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Cony.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Bold text indicates a defined term 1 Developer's Alternatives Statement, as provided for below; and the public 2 outreach methods to be used to engage stakeholders at the Stakeholder 3 Outreach Meetings consistent with the County's Guide to Golf Course 4 Conversion as established below. 5 b. Public Notice. The applicant shall be responsible for meeting the 6 requirements of LDC section 10.03.06. 7 2. Developer's Alternatives Statement requirements. The purpose of the 8 Developer's Alternatives Statement (DAS) is to serve as a tool to inform 9 stakeholders and the County about the applicant's development options and 10 intentions. It is intended to encourage communication, cooperation, and 11 consensus building between the applicant, the stakeholders, and the County. 12 b. Alternatives. The DAS shall be prepared by the applicant and shall 13 clearly identify the goals and objectives for the conversion project. The 14 DAS shall address, at a minimum, the three alternatives noted below. The 15 alternatives are not intended to be mutually exclusive; the conceptual 16 development plan described below may incorporate one or more of the 17 alternatives in the conversion project. 18 i. No conversion: The applicant shall provide a study examining the 19 current and potential financial state of the golf course should no 20 conversion occur. The study shall identify at a minimum: 21 a) Whether modifications to the existing acreage, design, or 22 maintenance of the golf course and/or club house would 23 allow for the golf course to continue operating; and 24 b) Whether a change in membership type (e.g. public vs. 25 private)would allow the golf course to continue operating. 26 c) Whether any other uses allowed in the district, tract or 27 context zone are viable; 28 ii. County purchase: The applicant shall coordinate with the 29 [County] to determine if there is interest to donate, purchase, or 30 maintain a portion or all of the property for a public use, e.g., 31 public park, open space, civic use, or other public facilities. This 32 section shall not require the County to purchase any lands, nor 33 shall this require the property owner to donate or sell any land. 34 iii. Conceptual development plan: The applicant shall prepare one or 35 more proposed conceptual development plans, consistent with the 36 development standards established in section LDC section 37 5.05.15 G, depicting the proposed conversion to share with the 38 stakeholders at the Stakeholder Outreach Meetings as described 39 below. The conceptual development plan shall include a narrative 40 describing how the plan implements and is consistent with the 41 goals and objectives identified in the DAS. The conceptual plan 42 shall depict the retained and proposed land uses, including 43 residential, non-residential, and preserve areas; existing and 44 proposed roadway and pedestrian systems; existing and proposed 45 trees and landscaping; and the proposed location for the 46 greenway, including any passive recreational uses. The 47 narrative shall identify the intensity of the proposed land uses; 48 how the proposed conversion is compatible with the existing 49 surrounding land uses and any methods to provide benefits or 50 mitigate impacts to the stakeholders. Visual exhibits to describe 29 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Cony.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term 1 the conceptual development plan and any amenities, including the 2 qreenway, shall also be provided. 3 3. Stakeholder Outreach Meetings (SOMs) for conversion applications. The SOMs 4 are intended to engage the stakeholders early in the conversion project and 5 inform the applicant as to what the stakeholders find important in the 6 neighborhood, what the stakeholders consider compatible with the neighborhood, 7 and what types of land uses they would support to be added to the 8 neighborhood. The applicant shall utilize Collier County's Guide to Golf Course 9 Conversion: Public Outreach Methods and Usable Open Space Concepts to 10 conduct the SOMs. An assigned County planner shall attend the SOM and 11 observe the process. The following is required of the applicant: 12 a. The Administrative Code shall establish the procedure and application 13 submittal requirements. 14 b. The applicant shall conduct a minimum of two in-person SOMs and a 15 minimum of one web-based visual survey on the proposed conceptual 16 plan(s). The web-based survey web address shall be incorporated in the 17 mailings notifying the stakeholders of the in-person SOMs. 18 c. At the SOM, the applicant shall provide information to the stakeholders 19 about the purpose of the meeting, including a presentation on the goals 20 and objectives of the conversion project, the alternatives established in 21 the Developer's Alternative Statement, the greenway concept, as required 22 in subsection D, and the measures taken to ensure compatibility with 23 the existing surrounding neighborhood. The applicant shall facilitate 24 discussion on these topics with the stakeholders using one or more public 25 outreach method(s) identified in the County's Guide to Golf Course 26 Conversion. 27 d. SOM report for conversion applications. After completing the SOMs the 28 applicant shall prepare a SOM report. The report shall include a list of 29 attendees, a description of the public outreach methods used, photos 30 from the meetings demonstrating the outreach process, results from 31 outreach methods (as described in the County's Guide to Golf Course 32 Conversion), and copies of the materials used during the SOMs. The 33 applicant shall also include a point-counterpoint list, identifying 34 reasonable input from the stakeholders and how and why it was or was 35 not incorporated in the conversion application. The report shall be 36 organized such that the issues and ideas provided by the stakeholders 37 are clearly labeled by the applicant in the list and the conversion 38 application. 39 4. Conversion application procedures. An applicant shall not submit a conversion 40 application (e.g. rezone, PUDA, SRAA, compatibility design review) until the 41 Intent to Convert application is deemed completed by County staff and the SOMs 42 are completed. Thereafter, the applicant may proceed by submitting a 43 conversion application with the County as follows: 44 a. Zoning actions. For projects subject to 5.05.15 B.1, the applicant shall 45 file a PUDA or rezone application, including the SOM report. No 46 deviations to LDC section 5.05.15 shall be approved; further, deviations 47 to other sections of the LDC shall be shared with the stakeholders at a 48 SOM or NIM. 49 b. Stewardship Receiving Area Amendments. For projects subject to 50 5.05.15 B.2, the applicant shall file a Stewardship Receiving Area 51 Amendments application, including the SOM report. No deviations to LDC 30 1:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Cony.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Tcxt ctrikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term 1 section 5.05.15 shall be approved; further, deviations to other sections of 2 the LDC shall be shared with the stakeholders at a SOM or NIM. 3 c. Compatibility design review. For projects subject to 5.05.15 B.3, the 4 applicant shall file a compatibility design review application, including the 5 SOM report. No deviations to LDC section 5.05.15 shall be approved. 6 D. Staff report for conversion applications. In addition to the requirements established in 7 LDC sections 10.02.08, 10.02.13 B.3, or 4.08.07, as applicable, the staff report shall 8 evaluate the following: 9 1. Whether the applicant has met the requirements established in this section and 10 development standards in the LDC. In particular, that the proposed design and 11 use(s) of the greenway, as applicable, meet the purpose as described 5.05.15 D. 12 2. Whether the SOM report and point-counterpoint list described above reflect the 13 discussions that took place at the SOMs. 14 3. Whether the applicant incorporated reasonable input provided by the 15 stakeholders, to the greatest extent feasible, to address impacts of the golf 16 course conversion on stakeholder real property. 17 4. Whether the applicant provided an explanation as to why reasonable input from 18 the stakeholders was not incorporated into the conceptual development plan. 19 E. Supplemental review and approval considerations for zoning actions and Stewardship 20 Receiving Area Amendments. The report and recommendations of the Planning 21 Commission and Environmental Advisory Council, if applicable, to the Board shall show 22 the Planning Commission has studied and considered the staff report for conversion 23 applications, reasonable input from the stakeholders, and the findings established in 24 LDC sections 10.02.08 E, 10.02.13 B, or 4.08.07, as applicable. In particular, the 25 Planning Commission shall give attention to the design of the greenway and how it 26 mitigates impacts to real property. Further attention shall be given to who can use the 27 greenway. The staff report for the Board shall include the Planning Commission's 28 findings. 29 F. Compatibility design review. For projects subject to 5.05.15 B.3, this section is intended 30 to address the impact of golf course conversion on real property by requiring the 31 conceptual development plan to be reviewed for compatibility with the existing 32 surrounding uses. The land use is not subject to review. The following is required: 33 1. Application. The Administrative Code shall establish the submittal requirements 34 for the compatibility design review application. 35 2. Public Notice. The applicant shall be responsible for meeting the requirements 36 of LDC section 10.03.06. 37 3. Review. The Hearing Examiner shall review the staff report as described in 38 5.05.15 D and the compatibility design review application as follows and make a 39 recommendation to the Board. 40 a. Whether the applicant has met the applicable requirements established 41 in this section and reasonably addressed the concepts identified in LDC 42 section 5.05.15 D.2 — D.4. 43 b. Whether the conceptual design is compatible with the existing 44 surrounding land uses. 45 c. Whether a view of open space is provided to existing property owners 46 that surround the golf course. 47 d. Whether stakeholders and/or other property owners are able to use the 48 greenway. 49 4. The Board shall consider the staff report and the report prepared by the Hearing 50 Examiner and approve, approve with conditions, or deny application. Upon 51 approval of the application, the applicant shall obtain approval of any additional 31 1:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Cony.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term 1 required development order, such as SDP, construction plans, or conditional 2 use. 3 G. Development standards. The following are additional minimum design standards for 4 zoning actions and Stewardship Receiving Area Amendments. 5 1. Previously approved open space. Golf course acreages identified to meet the 6 minimum open space requirements for a previously approved project shall be 7 retained as open space and shall not be included in open space calculations for 8 any subsequent conversion projects. 9 2. Greenway. The purpose of the greenway is to retain an open space view for 10 stakeholders, support passive recreational uses, and support existing wildlife 11 habitat. For the purposes of this section the greenway shall be identified as a 12 continuous strip of undeveloped land set aside for passive recreational uses, 13 such as: open space, nature tails, parks, playgrounds, golf courses, beach 14 frontage, disc golf courses, exercise equipment, and multi-use paths. The Board 15 may approve other passive recreational uses that were vetted at the 16 Stakeholder Outreach Meetings and are supported by the stakeholders. The 17 greenway shall not include required yards (setbacks) of any individual lots. 18 a. The greenway shall be generally located along the perimeter of the 19 proposed development and shall be adjacent to the existing residential 20 properties located around the golf course. The Board may approve a 21 secondary design that was vetted at the Stakeholder Outreach Meetings, 22 as provided for in LDC section 5.05.15 C.3 and is supported by the 23 stakeholders. 24 b. A minimum of 35 percent of the gross area of the conversion project shall 25 be dedicated to the greenway with a minimum average width of 100 feet 26 and no less than 75 feet at any one location. 27 c. The owner may not charge a fee for the use of the greenway. 28 d. The greenway may be counted towards the open space requirement for 29 the conversion project as established in LDC section 4.02.00 except as 30 noted in G.1 above. 31 e. Existing trees and understory (shrubs and groundcover) shall be 32 preserved and maintained within the greenway, except where minimal 33 improvements are needed that provide a passive recreational use. At a 34 minimum, canopy trees shall be provided at a ratio of 1:2,000 square feet 35 within the greenway. Existing trees may count toward the ratio; however, 36 trees within preserves shall be excluded from the ratio. 37 f. A wall or fence is not required between the greenway and the proposed 38 development; however, should a wall or fence be constructed, the fence 39 shall provide habitat connectivity to facilitate movement of wildlife in and 40 around the greenway. 41 g. A portion of the greenway may provide stormwater management; 42 however, the greenway shall not create more than F301 percent additional 43 lake area than what exists pre-conversion. Any newly developed lake 44 shall be a minimum of 100 feet wide. 45 h. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant in the County's official 46 records describing the use and maintenance of the greenway. 47 3. Supplemental preserve provisions. 48 a. Conversion projects with sporadic vegetation, e.g. isolated preserves 49 less than '/2 acre and/or areas of native vegetation retention less than '/2 50 acre (including planted areas)which meet the criteria established in LDC 32 I:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Cony.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx Text underlined is new text to be added. Tcxt strikcthrough is current text to be deleted. Bold text indicates a defined term 1 section 3.05.07 A.4 may recreate up to 100 percent of required preserve 2 area if located within the greenway. 3 b. The existing required preservation areas for a golf course shall be 4 retained and maintained as established in LDC section 3.05.07 B.1; 5 however, 50 percent of the areas may be counted towards the required 6 preserve area for the conversion project if located within the greenway 7 and made available for passive recreation uses as allowed for in LDC 8 section 3.05.07 H.1.h. 9 4. Stormwater management requirements. The applicant shall demonstrate that 10 the stormwater management for the surrounding uses will be maintained at an 11 equivalent or improved level of service. This shall be demonstrated by a pre 12 versus post development stormwater runoff analysis. 13 5. Floodplain compensation. In accordance with LDC section 3.07.02 floodplain 14 compensation shall be provided. 15 6. Soil and/or groundwater sampling. In addition to the soil and/or ground water 16 sampling requirements established in LDC section 3.08.00 A.4.d, the applicant 17 shall conduct soil and/or groundwater sampling for the pollutants as follows: 18 Managed turf, chemical storage/mixing areas, and maintenance areas (i.e. 19 equipment storage and washing areas, fueling and fuel storage areas) shall be 20 tested for organophosphate, carbamate, triazine pesticides, or chlorinated 21 herbicides. In addition, maintenance areas, as described above, shall be tested 22 for petroleum products. The County shall notify the Department of Environmental 23 Protection where contamination exceeding applicable Department of 24 Environmental Protection standards is identified on site or where an 25 Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 26 7. All other development standards. The conversion of golf courses shall be 27 consistent with the development standards in the LDC, as amended. Where 28 conflicts arise between the provisions in this section and other provisions in the 29 LDC, the more restrictive provision shall apply. 30 H. Design standards for lands converted from a golf course or for a permitted use within the 31 GC zoning district shall be subject to the following design standards. 32 1. Lighting. All lighting shall be designed to reduce light pollution. At a minimum, 33 lighting shall be directed away from neighboring properties and all light fixtures 34 shall be full cutoff with flat lenses. 35 2. Setbacks. All non-golf course uses, except for the greenway, shall provide a 36 minimum average 50-foot setback from lands zoned residential or with 37 residential uses, however the setback shall be no less than 35 feet at any one 38 location. 39 # # # # # # # # # # # # # 33 l:\2016 LDC Amendment Cycle\Amendments\Redevelopment of Golf Courses\5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Course amendment\5 05 15 Cony.Golf Courses CCPC review 12-15-16(12-7-16).docx n cnccn > nO W O b rD v C o = 0 c . .. rt. c S d0 Ol v, i-� p O Oaa o3 = 0• co Ul fD 3 z o (D n O . , 0 ° -, CD n * < "0 o ,-+ g fD Q rt v+ r+ fD N � ((D O .,+ 0- O Q n rt = rn a) rt 3 '+ -o 0 D 3 N v 3 (- Qro •< = o Cu0-s 3 � 0 hX -pa o -o o c-' on c 3. H LA h L n n " N 2ro or+ eL 33' a o v N -0 -' ° v 00 D -s N C Q 'rt n 0 (�D n Q v fp O O O [D O 0D a) 7 Q ul 3 eD 0 Q-O ..+' C 0 Q a) Q fD D (D !<D r+ Q C fD (h Q = 'n LA h r+ O— C y -I DDt N O M * h CCD C N 3 0� v o- -I -h G 0 CD — 3 = n Sn + '- CL c„ � rD s � rD 0 m o 3 r_+ CD CCCD fD N G ,.-f CD N 3 • r-F ,..r (D rt O M N • • • • • • • m 7Q -O -' Z - O p st u n v s -I Da o -I s p D O -1 0 -I 3 < 0 3 g (; D Cl - : -0 N a, C 0 ,•r (D 3 0 g s CD 0- 0_ fD S Cl) s m m n Q fD < co 7 -6 0 .a < (-D < -, Cl)lw (D' (nD `° fnD (D Q H °' < l J 0, rD O O D n< fD -, 0 co c n cn rt w 3 3 c O (LD '+ Di c O m m 3 n aa) °* c v c. EL M o as Q Q '- O m ° '+, -I (D o a 3 ar o 3 CD v � Dt1 .< cn n 7 �' n O * 7 n m- < s fD 0- C O 0 Q (D C s < rt fp O (D (D fD O „co (D < O_ _ Cr ., 74. W fD 7 �, •D H fD �' 7 '+ M S fD c -, n U'1 ,F D N fD 0 3 n Z (rtD Q �..._... 4, ii O (D ,0.' '•r v+, Q 'O-r ro Q O 't O a rt r+ 0 fDr O N O Q co 0 0 cu O G (p O ro O N O O 3 (<D CO ~•, co '6 '-r S N pa 't O • cn• p a) -0 O r+ N UW'1 •= = *.Cu N -' -, (D O "' vvi a0a C 0 O- O•• O v O O fD (D (n O 3 3 7 '6 7 -0 n rt O Da 7 rr CU fri, v da O , U c (rD (D O al n N 3 6. fp Q. G n S N N CD Q O — a) '+ rrt - 7 . _0 a, c N rt n O _• lb fl. Q '-r �' '-+ a) 7' v, O. C < n ,.+ (D 0 c -. (D in' fD (D C 3 rt > a a, n n boa ,-,- Di o * ;, CO � .� '^ n v, v, - n W O_ o -0 (D of Di •< n• ,,' rD v o o rD v rSD 0 Z Z Z cND CDD iVI M = s O Cr c O O- a h n O v m Q N 3 y O rr a .0 epi < < < a 0 MI (D -O ,=,: Q -n (D '+ 0- O vc S. O _� O Q (D 3 s 3 , fp fD fD tD 0 lD fD 3 a) 3 . r+ mv, 0 z ". -s -o I--, O CD ° 3 3 3 0- 3 3 3 C e-I- O v N * , v c Q vc — aOa Di N O W (D -fi fD S H 3 n O 0- Cr Cr 3 0 (D fD fD 0- * �- N < s O O Cu v, O fD (D (AlfD (D !D CD 7 1T Q fD Z Q p v' O, vr+i �, O_ n O CM) O rri. "0 O_ O• 0 -' Z Z � t-1, - -' 0. 0 O0 N co C '+ K r+ O Ori- Di 0- 3 O rN•r O- co O 7. DJ 'O fD l0 lO 01 SIN N F••► oFlli3 el m- cr D) : n- - � O Q n O L, n Q rt O (D Dl O N 0 3 A0 r 0• O -(, • n v -. CD a� rD -. — rr, -0 O h fD . Di .O Q fD ai c c 0 m Do r,; c0 -,, m c 0- Cu -S s 3 v S -I 3 �. cn Oa co �' Q N co CDD 0 s O 0 (CD - Q O' , 3 .(rt^ lD fD CD 'Sr (D cra n Q 'Nr O u, v '-n-r 0 O H rt = r3•r ET n o o rt fl < m m a o Q fD X -' Q O '-r 1-, n DA _ < ft) Z n v EL) uo N. 0 a) o o n 0 (�D n 3 0 O C CCDD - S , 'c^•r r•r — O C O , C G • C ut S N O comic 3 G ., -, rt fp rD , �. n rD r* �. m fo m- „, fD 3 < CU (D m 3 N (D ,� on CD '•r ro DJ r+ 3 3 rt rt O 0. W 0 ray. 0- . O a) Di s 'r O 0 0 S S 7 a : < (D 0 0 -< (D •< ,-' (D ,- rt CD fD fD v N C S CD C 0- •� V n 0 0 .D C 0 2 0 v 3 0 n ,-. eD O Frl a c o 3 v m.47,4- a 3 v 3 mD rt p o rt M 2 0- 0 (D r01+• fD fD f,D n O V r+ ' 0 0 3 a) -Icn rn cn Q 5' O v CD c o O fp o n v c o O G) = o (D v c o O rh Q 3 A r+ • O 0q In 3 rt 3 = -1:::5 OG .0 3 N rr 3 S 00 .. . rh 3 S 00 0 T (D O a) O a) O 3 C L' (D O a) 0 5 3 ' - 7' 3 0 0 5 3' C DU W OL 3 0a r* (D (D OZ1 (D DO Oq -6fa) fD N N Vf co .. O N• n 7 (D �. CD- C G7 '•h ra v rt G) N co 0 O X O N rD 3 O rt. •• W N , O aOi aa)) ,N+ •N 0 O v (D 0 0 H. Q- 0 3 0 3 0 3 -r 3 0 3 0 3 N r+ (!) r'+ r-r 3 U'1 rt (D Q O A' i f+ * N Q 0 * •O (N+ S .0 r.) r++ p (n rt N O 3 N O Lr) rt N O < a) N a) 7 rr O 3 v a COCU -„ * 5' = (rtD a) 7, = Q -moi, 0 C G� O On O -0 N D'q 3c Dm 2 M a) Cu G1 1 -, 0 �, 0 _rt 3 O o Q ..G q p N ..G o 3 ,_+ 3 N 3 rt C "a n `vrr p N CD 'rt n• , n -, r+ S rt N -ti rt v (D Q rt N O 3 N r'+ H D) < rt N -0 cu •-i- _1 N rt -I Q rt n 0 n co -I C O ? X C 3 -z C rt S 3- 3 (D O (D -, 3 3- S rt S ? 0- O N 0 N S n O O 0G < 0O (D v, Dl p'D O < 0 Q (D (D (D (D -• rt (D 3 (D N O (QD 3 -0 fD - (D Q O- 3 (CD v (1D '('° � -, a) D 3 0) < ((D d n' G) O-rt• m a' v s N Q h �, (D C (2(, 3 O + O N v VI 3 p3q DJ N 3 N �' (<D Q N �' = -- a) N Q (Dt 3 r+ , 3 n 3 m — C = -% .� 3 .� O 3 (D O- rte+ 3 O a) O a) Q rt (D Q O v N N Q art) m rt a- -0 an d 3 a) <• 3 3 -, 3 c c -, n r+ 0) H 3 Q �' (D (D 0 rt < N. Q a) co O N N N rt !D -, (D VI -, c O tD N tD * (D a) 3 ,3.t 3 (D 0 (<D O n at v r3+ ,3+ 3 (D N (rtD 0 rt 3 � O = (D 3 Q _ rt 3 v 0 (D N r+ N o �_ r+ N 3 — rt Q O O N N 3 3 r+ —h 3 O * Q ,�-r 3 CD OL X 0 -r (D 3 O CD N Q O N '.'r a) -0 3 3 (D fD M Q r3+ O O 3' _z- -' O rh OJ — N N Q N Q M. Q- N N c 3 N O z o 0 D N An a. al = 3- < f) C=M Dao N. A m co DTI `D v W D o o O n (D (D D W0. CL 0. u'1 3 CU m 0.1 3 S 3 Z o CL Q o co w 3 C N °10 fp as DJ = o .-i•3 CL N 7J 0 CD NO A 1D 3 0 N N NJ 3 l0 CD 0. DJ rh O. Z N 1-' C a) Z \ v 0-0 \ 3 ...� . o S N 3 C C) 01O (D 3 ci C 0. CDD N N 0 3 Attachment 1 2016 COLLIER COUNTY GOLF COURSES ,„1.5,-,.„,,,,,,, I — ="-"""° AVE MARIA INSET. LEE COUNTY I BONITA BEACH RD Panther Audubon CC Club @ Mediterra Quail West Golf&CC I Run Golf Club i 4V Bentley Village q .�..�.«...�..�..�«�.... ....-..i o Eu« Golf Club '„;�'' ' may :%'Talis Park Golf Club Cypress Woods { e '-4 ..++ J`a Golf&CC Quail Creek CC Heritage Bay Imperial Golf Club The Strand E Quail Village Golf Club 'Golf Course' Colliers Reserve CC j I 5aGolf,& rry �„", OIL WELL RD 1 1 $44.)''l .47.1. P z Old Collier Golf Club 1�� 1411 [ Twin Eagles a ,r a �� - Bonita Bay CIub.East ti IIITx AVE N IMMOICAL.EE RD , ,CC --- A PalmRiver CC(LaPlaya) Olde Cy es I (Cypress&Sabal) .Valencia Golf Course e (� Y 1 Arrowhead Golf Course a �{ Calusa Pines c: Stonebridge CC if? �; Vanderbilt CC > >Olde Florida A____dli Bay Colony Golf Club r i e , Tiburon`Golf Club z� Golf Club Pelican Marsh Golf Clubgaii. o 0 z vANDERBx.T BEACH RD Golf Club of :S Club @ Pelican Bay Ljl Vineyards of Naples the Everglades Z o ® o i GOLDEN GATE BLVD W GOLDEN GATE BLVD E Quail Run w Golf Club e C Country Club of Naples Pa PINE RIDGE RD 3 m z Royal Poinciana ♦ a a a a Kensington Golf&CC a ,i Golf Club o I a Hole in the Wall �YJ GREEN BLVD u Hideout Golf Club m J Wyndemere CC W' Golf Club c 1� I, L Grey Oaks Golf&CC High Point CC t i A, > GOLDEN GATE PKY B Moorings CC ‘11" I '. Quality Inn&Suites Golf Resort Wilderness CC � _ _ Bear's Paw CC Naples Grande Golf Club' G'Mil, @ Cedar Hammock Golf&CC �� RADIO RD Bretonne Park.-- CP Naples Beach Hotel ( '',=!--, Fox')re CC \ t or I♦ &Golf Club I,,.. I. 1°1` *4-----Forest Glen Golf&CC /... "\ n,o,IS BUD --.,air: Naples Heritage Countryside Golf Club----- a is a Evergreen— = ly a p Naples National Golf Club Glades Golf&CC--�— ? 16 B F m Royal Wood Golf&CC 1-'$ a Naples Lakes CC Lakewood CC------ Windstar on Naples Bay R CaLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD Royal Palm CC Riviera Golf Club t of Naples .. Mustang @ Lely Resort f, Hibiscus Golf Club 7,, m 0-4 i Lely Flamingo Island Club TPC @ Treviso Bay til 414/ Classics @ Lely Resort d' Z ti Eagle Creek CC r N ' $s- Silver Lakes RV Resort&Golf Club T9,>r�4s� .. TQC `I' Links of Naples Rookery at Marco Golf Club at Fiddler's Creek 1111 i.k-_ GOLF COURSE: ZONING Boyne South Golf Course o MN N GC ,, Hammock Bay Golf&CCd ®PUD u 1 RMF-16 Hideaway Beach Clubs -", 1 IRSF-3 all RMF-6 9. �,",�. J: -MARCO ISLAND �'. ' ®NAPLES > o� e 2 "E--/r)CITY LIMITS 0t�"1- Island CC 0 0.5 1 2 3w ; v � .4,1 %.,(�j ..�.. Miles -,ci. s'q l9 DDS [ a`! # 7. -a Ed CJ7L :: ›..1 al r-i- U.> DC. om CS2 i�i� �3 Goodlette frank RD N --_.�, r/r� m° "" ♦� " t. -. .: .= t N'' '� *aa,,;.. . .61 0 el,: .. 4. -4/0,1-i„,„. ' 4 e .' ro^ I* Ill '1 . ' .'a, . ' ' *.k' AS ' * -- 4,':: ..- --# ''' ' "-4''' ' ''' -41trio Ito:di 41%4 - *.09‘94:$74' '•-,, 44 r ,A1,... . 1.-; i ti N z 0 T , n .a 0 �„ t itik - - '.'- v,„,, 3.k ,r V* ,kR. i i .:I. '{ e."'N y wig .v k 'y r '('J.:`' »"� yy Rg 7 „.- 1.6. tort it. . . • - - i.1474t:9:;;;:e!!-.1.'H>'''''''' -414i. ., ; * '.---01, te 4..r' --in ' _ -r ,i- 2 mill ^ ; lair- oe CF wof V/ aMe B -:-- 0?litA ' ' , n r'° T r._ " pr,. ',t ,; �AIII� Y 3"� lY O _ • 3... m'- r z< i� 'o- '~t 0" lv• +i�',!,,,44,4,,..a4441;1.°' G ,. ,r Z-a �r�, • "r7,!-. . , ,-,,d Forest v Zt°i a+ ,. >ye ! r , z " '. ,,,.r-,."..'"'L'a k e s B L V D� c N .. fir„ ��Fi ` ;. •-•13—j'". Wit*"!' (7' c 0 2 ...,.... .� M.L 4.I O` .:754:, F. ur �' '" �° O O O Q� s(a 't**t ' i gl lie itt \ 100 6 R t+ � co C3-1 V 'i,A.,-41:::t — '. , yj'jj�7., a to CTD OIV ,- #i r } R Q u is Qr r �s.,:. y.�-'`_.., ..,. est-B LV .w ..._. ! ��...�" .:,�. rf 4 { co-3 3 .....c.iti,. . . „ . jit..„. . ..-.,,..--.'",00; . .. _.4.': . -- „.1:40,014,. .- ,. ,. '1, -7.-_,i-IL.: . ...-at . . . ._. .....„,,. . :...,..,- :. _..._...111,.. r,..::.,...„....::,,-,-..._._ 73 CI) _ ` - ""`' .. - 'Ouodlette-Frank COC1} ..Ei �G -' -z .,.E - „r., _...._. _. - - _. '- • NI 0 0 11 lin Ael v rs _ I a ,. = I a / tt ...'ifs4°°) .._...., ,,i , . .E ' / .i' A AOS -_..... _,.,' :_T _ ..-- • A ' )- 1,- — -4-,.--, „3/4-,,..,„„ . .. 7..., , ,,,.,,,t-._ , . . „_: - it, ., , •:,„0„,„.„. _ _ Oiy:, E i If ' .► _ • O _ .. , _ ----..-.--0.,-.- --T.-- - it,r;.-------- 41' : 1, Al.- 14 47.r A -:„ -----J,,...„.-...... _ 0 1 III fes` # Rsfs+- AA �� < ,. ! r. r ter* ?r pt t.id — - . '. 7.14.14:".: 17-414 .44:. .....- r---ii-l-::-...-' .14 CDx"« 'Y ` 4. C = - aux _o .4*��' - .� .a ' ti -.1,4,-; .,:.-,40 li.,*-- -.;---.,„.,,,-. .:i, ,...,::,,,? ...1‘,,X:,„--.4rtiti..,...A.'..„.•-__ :-' "-,-4.-:‘i'-t4, , ' ,„IN:*,,;--.'•4 '-"i-,,,,.!. 'r*-011-11-, .':'-;‘..-- ---:•• 431,z,--41. --:-.! „_-,-,,--„,:t,,,.„, ---- _ifif:e.0-•- -.•: W,'•--w!•-i-.,„,--' „j,:g.tz.--.: ,, ::„.•.:riok,...., ._,_i __:_:,..„. ..c.. .3_,....c___ .,,, ,,_, ,. ,,.._ ._._ .. .. .. ,,.,..„....,...,, ,::::,,,,„___ ,_0„,....,_:„ .:.:„:4_,,.,.:7„,4„,, ,,:;....___7___,,.,,,_,..4 0,,-,,- -:,: ' -.i.,... .-:-:__il .-_ -`=' a Z }V - \.`L :...,--_ _,,,,,4.':.,'a€` f,.... 4,.„- . ::-.,--, ,,,,,:-.-: .00011 4 st ae..'i' . .._.- <... •"'ire: Wy u 0/01, !� * Cts { ^ to C �D . 44 } --'r=- _- '� fig' " V''•••'^' ="± pJj (Si C 01 0 SD N O Q. a 1 v p T . -- _ _ 84 1. - N c ,41,::!ts ',.-,.**.4.1... ::::::.---,:::::;•.,1 %.,:--------' - ---- ---- - - - frou:.•- •--.:- - .- • i,..--- ,. -•,.. ,,.,:„.,:ii..4,..._ 0?,;.wiiiiri, .Ap. -'-4'1,7.•-f .•'-1.,.-•:'•::::'Z,.i••,-,•!t-,.., --..-...;- '-'''2'••-•••--4r• -7:"'7--•:.-•- fri•,•- •-- • • ...- -.,. -t.' 1 Ca a ..: .Pi..„,..._.,„ 2. ..:'- :---ri----:7:-;--t-L---,-,,;,-'-:-,,:.:..,:--,:-/ -,'-' ' 't---3'ti-'-- -----'-'-'-' -1-.--,-- ' - co Olt . ,,- ' - C .ifs k Rosepetal L•N p C o. 71 Q fD � 9' er. --%."::-... .. _ . _ i- _ . - - _ fD �� - f .N"trEelnle ,: 9 oma 7 _ '7 0 0 '';e 1_ .,;.:''-r-' ---,..', ;;;V -if'f.'-,N'tr....,',:,:-','=,.`-il...t'-',.' *- --,, ':-,,.: ,,,,::.;4.:. ,.7,-.114-:;,1'.-,-fti,‘:.i.,. -- . ,.,..,_ i3/4. k,,, .....,„_ ,,, ...„,„,,4„,„,„,.. .u- :1-A::',,,-"51t1.,:47470..;'$' 4� .. , - n oC c G ",‘':::,,,.:;64,t-- -4i,i--%„-,171;-',-;t4.2:61-'. ,,, .,.. .,,,, ,,,,,,,-,.±460,0,;, - ;,4,1:: :::::::::::17-1.'''i. ',.:'''''',''''''''''':,',1 -1'': a , :::::::1',:. :;,:,,':-:::,,,,,':;,,,l',:,:..',::ic:.:_,.,,-3,.:', „,i'l.:_e,::::',.:::**:.,,,i.,.::::,*-tli,:-'4-irr,:i.E,,, Vin r ( ; 4 sem..,., IN 4, . .. 0 t .� /--- , ' x, _h '- :� - 7 ' .' . �� t° s / s ` • : tet_ __A\ \ . -,--j-', - L.). All 0 _ a co r 3 m a) f ' o_ - I 0 0 ea m 0w -� ry --AlL: ',;:..: * , '''' r---- - -,-,--..-a---0,,----- 't.'7;..,'-i,. 0 CU - cp • 1 i u, z 03 3 Q 11) 0 .'- _._ ,{ '1 1't- . - ~,.i„K mss ..x:-r.,a�... D fl y" ' 3� .. '� m m =fit CI' Z F 4 O 1 $ I m v._,..,,,.,,,,„:„.,,: _ -�4, �`-, . - r 1 Imo 414 4.11 _ -o 0 , t co O U) !ll�� I CDmoi._..,.,_.,,.:rw=waasat .rwar.aw gJ _ i fi i - k' i.i1i.... .“..*-!114-s: 111 'A'` ii, R - , 41a fi z - f"r"«ww ii ,j q x, { tar a ; )... - .* 14...‘*' ' ' . - . : 'Ngfi_ .t- e V£uit I , -e "^ .w- M�Y/0� � i ,'L._,.� m �..�.�__P ice!' /� f ; r k - , - .rit, ij, , . , . _. n, #r r ' ' ,,kir 7 4 . . min tm ' sm 4 111 i,y (7 C 0 03Q - � ( NCD 3 o 1 o - Q ... .,. h._ 0 0 cri ,n � ,.... rM1�kx <„' 'gyp . i t p `�,` te✓ 1C s t 40 Do cSst:. sr;iti , z . A 5- x mo ' - XI O _ Snowflake LN as c Palm DR-- - • tQ '.. Nr-<4'o-- ', Q bitPte[ x o _ CO` a / .44 1- 111r– k--- Ii_w_.,t.:_,,,,,"701.6.0.:07.c.. .t; _„:„.: it,* ...., \\.-.... : : k4. a i \\\. a o <p 11 3 UI { rr t!W' �1� . O m { a B k a it . 1111 xi ,4ig CD i>� N G7 !. m a d!Pm m —f1 f _ ii < — '` V I .,:-.. ci-- 7: y 8r9s om. Q _ -;y � E f ; ., r 'o o W noir a '3 ;� .p a" ___ -„--7:---t.fis r .8 -:-'8:r O n N m , (4 0 CT "ri 5 ijPx ' .' ...-,-. --,.-,-::-:--ta. "• 9- .;,- - ,--..,",-*"-- -t--- ,":'; --- ': -r ' II.-- .,..”''' -- n f a - - RO d`" mr f• 1 a iv g � 7 Jen' b D " _ :: d .. � ...-7:-.,:_._ co Q zE ter' _ �, 4, a jt $ � '• -0>0 1 t 'la,'00 --:-'''' 0\:.,. ,\ °:50.. ..fg ' :_'.0.00 ,,. , .1, , ^ / . () .Y` . t ¢ 1 d Sof y 6 m /0N xl 1 N C " ca m z , C I R , moral \N \ t: ' „__, ,..„„....._____, „la.„,/....., ala 73 N ie I 10 c t- 1 O cr o.° ). C 11 ' dm NI Pe o• 4 i 40 i 6V,,asCO 8 bb/e g ch C/R O °�a .�tt2 oCD/ A / m 8f Qa°+ t o f t?.; 730 ;, O f i''' 41 tG '` „ o m}Napa,1.stle .. ��3 one LTN1.0 / jZ v W r r / °> , 4 U cQ 0.('D i tvcc4 isi ,criO o N ,,,:,..44',4 O _, co `t. I es CQ t 17/ C (i.., O. p 01 ‘-'4- F . .+-srr --_,_.A.;-.fir ,.. ,_,....1...L. .,3 • 1 t. ,_,c- ; cu 0+ . ca , : ...-**,.... , 0. on* )! It,',..,::7.: , ..-: , ,1...1,- ,-11..,24..,1'''''' 'Il'' a : ' l' ) ............,:t. 4. -0 > C 4- a -. 0 . E D ,,, .,4,..,., `..4. ...,„ , - 0 S; ___ 2 5 '.' --- ' i44 ' ,, , ,, -a 0 .*... *- * * -a , El.,..*L.. 715 ----- 6 'IV 7.044‘'P*I*:.%'r4--, '''..... ' 'c, '.,. il -:3"-7r,,:tr:'"r,'C'Tc,,:'''''';',..r..7,-•?,..',::',..,,,,.:, ',,,- .- ,,,.: ..... ....... ,. -- . .. .. . 2 , T .: M :l'7- .' ',., $ ' c ' c -- s-1 0 1,/,1/4„*„..- „, -4.,,. <... itr* „ ,la ,..t, ,,..i '''' ,. ir -,-k-et.- /4' -g„.., ., • -' / t... ..„,...„ .,, . . .., . . A ,i 2 , __-----------,,,, _ ,..,. ... .,!-- 0 .4 f A 0 ... . . . ., .. . ... ..,,, , ' 0 ' . - . , 0 ,.. ---- .:: Q. 1 ' C —I I 0) xi a Ci) = rTI a 1.14 C •N 0''' RoS e W/00 .s 1 1\C a k (D 1. . 1 —1 CD 1 ' --. CD 1 u) (D CD .. - I .. . °,‘0.2,4‘‘,,_a 1 ,_ - .400/#114ev ... . , ....- . '' , - - '”'.7.4':-.-.*`" aidd'af P° _4 3 /I a - , , . . ... . ..., - $ ' , ... in, CO (D , •I ''''''''''''- ,.. , „,......*::S''''.TiOr• - .j 4.1 ! .. „ .,,,,,,i.i,. -'-'t-' . ' "1113 LV D- . .... f -.:..,-.,..: ... • Logan" Ej CD = _ .,_. , - .....;;---,+-mr-7.'''' . _ _ ,..-: ..........-- ,.....-eezie„.„ IA "J"I-:- S, '' '•;' -0 ' L. ---1 ° 71 (1:-.1 , , ,,..,......--7 ,.... „ , - 1 \ li.: co-0.: i-;.- -•._ 8 Q r. 1 Al- - . r,.) ° 'a f•--''''-e.,***),-/I,J.4i,- •q:J4i,c,?:-..:J.i....-e.., '--.4 ' 'M'=„ I.1- au,, ': 2. „4---'2,`"44 •- - - - - ``..i.:-.,-.. , -9 ccl,. .._ - :.-w 1--.., -:,...4.-,-1 ,. . . 5 co. 03 o I 0) o _ - M C° 0 CZ) 0 • t r '> s em - '' tSI e 27 m ' 4 � IV r<m04 o C z� m Z o o r o n" y' (�r 3 �'"w. 2°O�a g g . ST) ca Zi5 g z - III0000,0 00., Zi411114 I I rAitli C) m5-. +itJil , Qo;6 e 1, a ,1,14111 ' `G �-�+•. 1!4liT 430004.."i... r.�'`�i"" ,00.6Lr '. $.. R {... ,.J._, E 7 y «• x 5. 0 L ' i,4. , , ,....., ,,,..,,„\ ' A .. �� R hirley ST „, ,,,. ,.,.....„..„_._ _ . ....... s "^fit 1 _ ;a -I t c '.4, , / -- „,..,-,r-. i ,-- .- .-;...k , ,,it- -ix „, .i ,,tal # 14 ,-; , -.#k.. , ‘, 11T +9 s - 0 IiI*4 R0 r w' T ;” m k • cv -' - .. "� o YahI.', D ' CoM W x y �'s r d. a. z 4t 4 m 414. '•' 1° at A III 44, Qto i Ci. M 4 m I 0 A O Naples BLVD N Humming bir� ry ..4,47). —ItC Ei coal r. al v O 0 -I N 7 a \ k rn .1 6 m to S CI. o cn O F ,Cil E ` o N I YO i' Z O _ 7 Y.,r COyster .._ CO _ s* atcher PT\ .. —. oi CD C e` CO wa x �#4- �- O TIO CD �. . _ y a z- A m L. 3 a (n 3 itsz ,'. ' „ ,,, ,,,, _ J ,....... Tv 4111 7 tii6 s ...,-,:i-:,...-ii,---'--._ „ - - , -_ -,..-, ,'. --- .1r tak ..,. ,-, t-i_,,, , -.. c; . ,, ;-,,,,,,,,,, ,.,,-.,:--, ,A,.**,--.„ --._ c .z, : ,.,,,,,i,.... ,„-- s„,„.,.,,,...,,N,,,,, ,„,,,,,,,..,.,.--r„,, - ,,, ,„ ,-- - � lilt �,: . ..,...- ---„- .�>�” �* r� N TMs; _ . . , _ -- J.% ** 111. . y ° its } ''ll,,... ':it0:111 1.,,,,'Wlii '''r''. '''' 7' � . -1 'ae„, ". c „it 111 aouaddnl , fere.,-744 ,e' <� 1 c f r ,tet iiiii,, Ar XJ P ;` 4,/,-,,,,-,;_,-,_ tib , LaketC e ........ . . G7 71: r c � t' fi4,4i,..-2'-,ials!M A g 1 yy a Hummingbild 0 W \ ‘,‘ r rs LN v j O 3 -, cp N (1) t d .p r O O o 3 N O ca ii s? i. �O 0. iz iO :c 3 "Qo ot co : =. ,r 1.7,u:\ ti rw ,. a z La _wr �a�Ms -- , cn "V.'.4 m i, ,, m, . -*-* m t ' . ! N I , 1 DR Ni piobe,os t o 1 e t•J .. ss al z , - . 1 j G) a Y d O o n Cr) �1 E.,c. f1 r-f D il ♦ J ; � O Parnui N app. u) Yass3 ►— N, ^ �V Ll s ��g ; H W wa'om a■ \.„-'/'- 9 Teen / 'Weneheste ba C� ti cn 0. Z Ufa �* J gm 11 D 00700 110411. $ fa`g c 0 O V') OF as f o la } s - A eir el :41-.4::,,/ ".4 ad `. r a3 fl 001, Car o m 0 mf/ .4. Q o cri 1l ( 3 o ootO j w cn 6myoa 7e- m a ma co ¢ -I z ■ {° nm(-31 __ Airport RD N Mill p O� a t § n;d 4. ,, 1744...n° h. '- -% - a o o Fly m m z m a .ec�n e o 0 9