The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 12/13/2016 Item #17D 17.D. 12/13/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Rural Agricultural zoning district to the Residential Single Family (RSF-1) for property located on the west side of Morgan Road, approximately 750 feet north of Sabal Palm Road in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 5.7± acres; and by providing an effective date. [RZ-PL20160001132] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staffs findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition, and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property, consisting of 5.7± acres, is located on the west side of Morgan Road, approximately 750 feet north of Sabal Palm Road. The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone the property from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to the Residential Single Family (RSF-1) zoning district in order to subdivide to create another lot [for a total of two(2) separate lots]. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain an adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the CCPC to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict), as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The present FLUM designation of Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, allows residential development at a maximum gross density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre (DU/A), or 2.5 DU/A through the use of transfer of development rights (TDR) Credits. No TDRs are involved with this proposal. The additional lot and single-family residential uses identified will not exceed the transitional densities of the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict. The proposed residential density of 1.0 DU/A, based upon the requested zoning district, will not exceed the maximum base density of the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict. In order to promote smart growth policies and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, staff evaluated the request in relation to Objective 7, Policies 7.1 through 7.4. The proposed rezoning petition may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. Packet Pg. 2707 17.D 12/13/2016 Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff reviewed the application and found this petition consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. As indicated in the TIS dated July 19, 2016 the proposed rezone request is to allow two (2) single-family residential units instead of the current single unit. The adjacent monitored roadway link Collier Boulevard (CR 951), between Rattlesnake Hammock Road(CR 864) and Tamiami Trail (US 41),is a six (6)-lane divided roadway with a current service volume of 3,000 trips, with approximately 1,274 trips remaining. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element(CCME). A preserve, in accordance with the GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1,will be required at time of final plat for the subdivision. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC reviewed this petition at their November 17, 2016 meeting. No members of the public came forward to speak. Commissioner Homiak made a motion to approve, which was seconded by Commissioner Dearborn. The vote to approve was unanimous (5-0). No opposition to this petition has been received. The CCPC vote was unanimous; therefore, the petition can be placed on the Summary Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: Petitioner is requesting a rezone from the A zoning district to the RSF-1 zoning district. The attached staff report and recommendations of the CCPC required are advisory only and are not binding on you. All testimony given must be under oath. The Petitioner has the burden to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below, and you may question Petitioner, or staff, to satisfy yourself that the necessary criteria have been satisfied. Should you consider denying the rezone, to assure that your decision is not later found to be arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable, the denial must be based upon competent, substantial evidence that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for Straight Rezones 1. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 2. Will the proposed rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 3. Would the proposed rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 4. Are the existing district boundaries illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change? 5. Do changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary? 6. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? Packet Pg.2708 17D 12/13/2016 7. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development,or otherwise affect public safety? 8. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 9. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 10. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 11. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 12. Will the proposed change constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare? 13. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning? 14. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County? 15. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 16. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 17. What is the impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code Ch.106,Art.II], as amended? 18. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to this rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety,and welfare? This item has been approved as to form and legality, and it requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and recommends that the Board approve the applicant's request to rezone to the RSF- 1 zoning district. Prepared by: Eric L. Johnson, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner, Zoning Division, Growth Management Department ATTACHMENT(S) 1.Attachment 1 - Staff Report(Nov 17 2016) (PDF) Packet Pg.2709 17.D 12/13/2016 2.Attachment 2 -Proposed Ordinance (PDF) 3. [Linked] Attachment 3 -Application and Support Material (PDF) 4.Attachment 4 -FLUE Consistency Review (PDF) 5.Attachment 5 -Collier County Property Appraiser Sketch (PDF) 6.Attachment 6 - Size of Existing Dwelling Email (PDF) 7.Attachment 7 -Density Map (PDF) 8. Attachment 8 -Legal Notifications (PDF) 9. Legal ad-Agenda ID 2330 (PDF) Packet Pg.2710 17D 12/13/2016 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.D Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Rural Agricultural zoning district to the Residential Single Family(RSF-1) for property located on the west side of Morgan Road, approximately 750 feet north of Sabal Palm Road in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 5.7±acres; and by providing an effective date. [RZ-PL20160001132] Meeting Date: 12/13/2016 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal—Zoning Name: Eric Johnson 11/08/2016 10:34 AM Submitted by: Title: Division Director-Planning and Zoning—Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 11/08/2016 10:34 AM Approved By: Review: Zoning Michael Bosi Additional Reviewer Completed 11/22/2016 9:59 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 11/22/2016 11:20 AM Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Division Reviewer Completed 11/22/2016 11:28 AM Growth Management Department David Wilkison Level 2 Division Administrator Completed 11/22/2016 1:41 PM County Attomey's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 11/22/2016 1:46 PM Growth Management Department James French Additional Reviewer Completed 11/28/2016 10:20 AM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 11/28/2016 2:03 PM County Attorney's Office Scott Teach Level 3 County Attomey's Office Review Completed 11/29/2016 8:51 AM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 11/29/2016 11:01 AM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 12/04/2016 12:46 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 12/13/2016 9:00 AM Packet Pg.2711 17.D.1 CO r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION a) FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION o GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT M HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2016 z SUBJECT: RZ-PL20160001132—275 MORGAN ROAD (NAFTAL) REZONING PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT &AGENT: o 2 Owner/Applicant: Agent: N Theodore and Nancy Naftal Frederick E. Hood, AICP 275 Morgan Road Davidson Engineering, Inc. Naples, FL 34114 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 Naples, FL 34110 CN REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone the property from the Rural Agricultural (A)zoning district to the Residential a Single Family(RSF-1) zoning district. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of 5.7± acres, is located on the west side of Morgan Road, approximately 750 feet north of Sabal Palm Road in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is requesting to rezone the subject 5.7± acre site in order to subdivide a parcel to E create another lot [for a total of two (2) separate lots]. (See location map on the following page) RZ-PL20160000382—275 Morgan Road (Naftal)Rezoning Page 1 of 11 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg.2712 (6uivazai (le}}eN) peon ue6.ioW SLZ : 0££Z) (91.0Z LL AoN) lode i}}e;g- 1,;uawyae;;y :;uewg0e4y eh' 0';: N s a i0 F1: Ey . 1. Z u 2 W e to 0— O i WE ° Y e e 0/ - Q ` E, ��©��i 2 ® `�i ©��A ` 0 N ' C ® �d 0 N E. ° Co v,• e ° 44- a ❑ O o e d - ° e e a e ° o _11.41 f t i N ° „ � N �w N o W ID Y = N Z (- z C 00 w i= O g ac- o0 :.4 o o a) J a —1CL a co 0 ^ N Y1 � CO N i c co 4= 0 0A18 JaIIIOO a GI U w O 0 o J a) E Q'I E Cn 5 w c cc m a, ,a a YrY mac m E c.❑ 0 0 17.D.1 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: '-' This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the subject parcels: North: Agricultural (Jade Orchids) with a single-family dwelling, zoned A East: Right-of-way for Morgan Road, then farther east is a single-family dwelling = and an agricultural use (Landscaper's Choice), both zoned A •o N ec a) South: Agricultural with a single-family dwelling, zoned A West: Single-family dwelling, zoned A z rts 1 a o e cv t a"''''' a ,,. s --� IX j'( �-•� z b �� V s x CO .� ' � ') I nC Pf t.7 9S �7 @ }ix' ..„,4-,-- {i �" - '6�§"t, 1 S � _ ' 'i n ° w a , ,• ; rc pt „2.,..,...-.....,,,,.--t-;!,,,,41; e.,.., `e.a , t"', in ROCKEDGE .”"3 , _ j s �'., N OC ,�` Subject Property � ' � � M �. c CN " ti i, � 4r4s � �r �4 L peittli eu� C. i� N• k sw t n ��,._ _ z ,.4°'4,41--.* �J : �g 1 Z -'4..,y "Ft; �� n m ---,.- sof c ',' `� �� a .,1' %„,,,..�E- ,�, J'q y - f r„ O. CD re 1 4471 & r � % ,_:1,41-1-7, gv 4" t6 WINDING 39ba1 Pa 7.8., " k _�-�. w (^;� �, � " """" 'v"2omn�Pt7D CYPRESS` � �'^ ��,'�-----,--t,-;,,, ,,,� Pos pt HA iENDA r m.,.«.« -'"' m .s � ;Yeryonai+a.rkj►ti72 + .,._ �X``" �"zd -: .--',.•-.�.. a r. Nt-..,: rr,' -M t a>,k,,.�',�.� ``. ',: ++ Aerial(County GIS) a0i E GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: U tv Q Future Land Use Element(FLUE): The subject property is located within the Urbandesignated 2. area (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict), as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM)of the Growth Management Plan(GMP). The present FLUM designation of Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, allows residential development at a maximum gross density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre(DU/A), or 2.5 •::-'( DU/A through the use of transfer of development rights (TDR) Credits. No TDRs are involved with this proposal. The additional lot and single-family residential uses identified will not exceed the transitional densities of the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict. The proposed residential RZ-PL20160000382—275 Morgan Road (Naftal) Rezoning Page 2 of 11 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg. 2714 17.D.1 density of 1.0 DU/A, based upon the requested zoning district,will not exceed the maximum base density of the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict. In order to promote smart growth policies and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, staff evaluated the request in relation to Objective 7,Policies 7.1 through 7.4. The proposed rezoning petition may be deemed consistent with the FLUE (see Attachment 4—FLUE Consistency Review). rn Transportation Element: N Transportation Planning staff reviewed the application and found this petition consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. As indicated in the TIS dated July 19, 2016 ,:° the proposed rezone request is to allow two(2)single-family residential units instead of the current single unit. The adjacent monitored roadway link Collier Boulevard (CR 951), between -o Rattlesnake Hammock Road (CR 864) and Tamiami Trail (US 41), is a six (6)-lane divided roadway with a current service volume of 3,000 trips, with approximately 1,274 trips remaining. Therefore, the subject rezoning can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. r- ti Conservation and Coastal Management Element(CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). A preserve, in accordance with GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1, will be required at time of final plat for the subdivision. ti GMP Conclusion: 0 The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency cc with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. cnw ANALYSIS: E Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and has reviewed the criteria c on which a determination must be based.These criteria are specifically noted in Section 10.02.08.F of the LDC. The staff evaluation establishes a factual basis to support the recommendations of staff. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for the recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners(Board),who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. These evaluations are completed as part of the Zoning and Land Development Review m provided below. Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. This project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews RZ-PL20160000382—275 Morgan Road (Naftal) Rezoning Page 3 of 11 November 4,2016 Packet Pg.2715 17.D.1 as identified in Chapter 2,Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. The subject property was created by a lot split of an eleven (11)-acre tract in 2010. Further division of the lot will require approval of a subdivision plat. Landscape Review: Approved. Landscaping will be required pursuant to the LDC requirements. School District: The applicant is requesting an exemption from school concurrency. The proposed change does not meet the criteria for an exemption. At this time there is sufficient capacity within the elementary,middle, and high school concurrency service areas of the proposed project. At the c time of a subsequent development order, the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity within the concurrency service areas the development is located within or adjacent concurrency service areas. This finding is for planning and informational purposes only Cil and does not constitute either a reservation of capacity or a finding of concurrency for the proposed project. ca0 Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval of this project. °' Utilities Review: The property is located in an exempt service area of the Collier County Water- ti Sewer District pursuant to the Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance (2001-13). Pursuant to the Statement of Utility Provisions, a private well and septic system are proposed. Co) Zoning Services Review: As stated in the applicant's cover letter (see Attachment 2—Application and Support Material), the petitioner is requesting to rezone the subject parcel for the purpose of N''� subdividing to create another lot for a single-family dwelling. The property is currently zoned A, and the requested zoning category is RSF-1. The A zoning district allows less residential density 'o than the RSF-1 zoning district. However, sandwiched in between the A and RSF-1 zoning districts (in terms of maximum allowable density) is the Estates (E) zoning district. Since the petitioner is c requesting to upzone the property from A to RSF-1, staff determined it would be appropriate to re compare the Purpose and Intent language of each of the aforementioned zoning categories. The following table compares the purpose and intent for the A, E, and Residential Zoning Districts (RSF-l; RSF-2; RSF-3; RSF-4; RSF-5; RSF-6). r c 0 U f4 r Q a. G d (See Table 1 on the following page) RZ-PL20160000382—275 Morgan Road (Naftal) Rezoning Page 4 of 11 November 4,2016 Packet Pg.2716 17D.1 Table 1. Comparison of Purpose and Intent Zoning Purpose and Intent District A The purpose and intent of the A zoning district is to provide lands for agricultural, pastoral, and rural land uses by accommodating traditional agricultural, agricultural related activities and facilities, support facilities related to agricultural needs, and conservation uses.Uses that are generally considered compatible to agricultural uses c that would not endanger or damage the agricultural, environmental, potable water, c or wildlife resources of the County, are permissible as conditional uses in the A ec district. E The purpose and intent of the Estates district (E) is to provide lands for low density ps residential development in a semi-rural to rural environment, with limited ? agricultural activities.In addition to low density residential development with limited c agricultural activities, the E district is also designed to accommodate as conditional rt uses, development that provides services for and is compatible with the low density c residential, semi-rural, and rural character of the E district. a� `o RSF The purpose and intent of the residential single-family districts is to provide lands E primarily for single-family residences. These districts are intended to be single- N family residential areas of low density. The nature of the use of property is the same c in all of these districts. enen N The above table shows that rezoning to either the E or the RSF-1 zoning district would be 476. consistent with the stated future use of the property. Single-family dwellings are allowed in all N three (3) zoning districts. The E and RSF-1 zoning districts allow for nearly the same permitted and conditional uses. Rezoning from A to either the E or the RSF-1 zoning district would be nearly o equivalent in that regard. 0 o. In addition to comparing allowable uses between the E and all RSF zoning districts, it is also Et appropriate to compare the most relevant development standards applicable to each district. cn Table 2. Comparison of Development Standards Y Zoning Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Maximum Minimum Minimum E District Lot Size Front Side Yard Rear Building Floor Lot a (in acres) Yard Yard Height Area (s.f.) Width Q A 5 50 30 50 35 550 165 E 2.25 75 30 75 30 1,000 150 0 a� RSF-1 1 50 30 50 35 1,500* or 150 s u 1,800** .2 Q * One (1) story ** Two (2) stories RZ-PL20160000382—275 Morgan Road (Naftal) Rezoning Page 5 of 11 November 4,2016 Packet Pg. 2717 17.D.1 Excluding minimum lot size, Table 2 shows similarities between the A and the RSF-1 zoning districts; however, when compared to the E zoning district, staff notes the E zoning district has greater front and rear setback requirements. Staff questioned whether rezoning to E would be more suitable than the RSF-1 zoning district given the fact that the applicant's narrative limits the scope of the request so that no more than one (1) additional lot would be created. However, it is staff's understanding the applicant's choice to rezone to the RSF-1 zoning district is based, in part, due to the lesser setbacks required by the RSF-1 zoning district when compared to the E zoning district. The applicant does not have an issue with staff's recommendation to limit the rezone request to a maximum of two (2) lots. o N re The survey provided by the applicant shows that a two (2)-story house and an accessory structure Ta are located near the northwest corner of the subject parcel. They are non-conforming because they do not comply with the side and rear yard setbacks; however, the degree of their non-conformity would not increase by this request. The petitioner does not intend to raze the structures, and the structures would remain on the property in their current configuration. It is staff's opinion the ce° development standards of the RSF-1 zoning district would be compatible with the zoning of the co abutting properties and of those within close proximity to the subject site. Staff was concerned =' that the existing dwelling would not meet the minimum 1,800-square foot floor area requirement 2 of the RSF-1 zoning district. However, the drawing from the Collier County Property Appraiser ti website shows that the square footage of the house is greater than the minimum required (see Attachment 4 — Collier County Property Appraiser Sketch). The applicant also asserts that the existing dwelling would comply with the minimum required (see Attachment 5 —Size of Existing Dwelling). CN When rezoning to a base zoning district, it is important to anticipate the greatest intensity and development potential allowed by the requested zoning district. The FLUE allows for up to 1.5 dwelling units per acre at this location. Under the RSF-1 zoning district,the greatest development potential would be restricted to no more than (1) dwelling unit per acre. If the intent is to create only one (1) additional lot, the resultant density would be 0.35 dwelling units per acre. Staff has no issue with the density requested by the applicant to create an additional lot(from compatibility perspective). f6 cn It should be noted that if the petitioner chooses to plat the subject parcel, staff does not anticipate any future issues,provided that the small existing structure located near the center of the site would comply with the side yard setback once a new property boundary is created. m E U RZ-PL20160000382—275 Morgan Road (Naftal) Rezoning Page 6 of 11 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg.2718 17.D.1 Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals,objectives,and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. 'o Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 7,6 m 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning portion of this staff report. If approved with staff's recommendation, the rezoning to RSF-1 would result in two (2) lots, which is compatible with the existing En land use patterns of the abutting and surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. („ An isolated zoning district would be created; however, the RSF-1 zoning district would result in use(s) and development standards that are compatible with adjacent and nearby districts. Co- 4. o4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing ti conditions on the property proposed for change. The boundary of the new RSF-1 zoning district would mirror the boundary of the rectangular-shaped subject parcel. a. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. in The proposed change is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Staff does not anticipate the subdivision of land will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. RZ-PL20160000382—275 Morgan Road (Naftal)Rezoning Page 7 of 11 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg.2719 17D.1 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project at this time. Development on the subject site must also comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations and operational improvements when development approvals are 8' sought. o a1 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. Staff does not anticipate any stormwater related issues resulting from the approval of the z proposed lot split and subsequent development of the site. Further, County staff will evaluate the site's stormwater system at time of review of any building permits. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The RSF-1 development standards are designed to ensure that the proposed structure will not significantly reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. e`! 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent CN areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property.Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination z° is driven by market value. 0 a a) 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. U) Staff does not anticipate the rezoning would be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. 4. c If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed rezone, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are R consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. RZ-PL20160000382—275 Morgan Road (Naftal) Rezoning Page 8 of 11 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg. 2720 17D.1" 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The minimum lot size for the A zoning district is five (5) acres. The property is too small to subdivide and create another legal lot of record under the existing regulations. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or - the County. c 0 It is staff's opinion the proposed rezoning to the RSF-1 zoning district is not out of scale with the needs of the community or the County. Ta -- 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 0 The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses •• under the proposed zoning classification. Any future development anticipated by the rezoning would require an extensive evaluation cc relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the building permit N process. 0 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02 regarding N Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. cc 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)shall deem important in the protection of the public health,safety,and welfare. c To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING(NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM for September 29, 2016 at the Collier County South Regional Library, located at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway in Naples. No members of the public attended the meeting. RZ-PL20160000382—275 Morgan Road (Naftal)Rezoning Page 9 of 11 November 4,2016 Packet Pg.2721 17D.1 COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on October 28, 2016. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval, subject to the following condition: Q) 1. The subject 5.75-acre property shall be limited to a maximum of two (2) lots. CD Attachments: 1) Proposed Ordinance 2) Application & Support Material .� 3) FLUE Consistency Review 4) Collier County Property Appraiser Sketch 5) Size of Existing Dwelling Email a) 6) Density Map 7) Legal Notifications ti N O N .- O N ti O Z r L O 0_ LLQ) N N-. CC co G E C) cC a) E L C) CC RZ-PL20160000382-275 Morgan Road (Naftal)Rezoning Page 10 of 11 .-�. November 4,2016 Packet Pg.2722 17.0.1 PREPARED BY: .6";) r7L 6,1)--t.t /D7Z-S4 ERIC JOHNSON, AICP, CFM, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION -61c 'c 0 N REVIEWED BY: mk./14 /6 RAYMC► D V. BILL WS,ZONING MANAGER DATE co ZONING DIVISION 92 0 a ti t— /( N � M MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION co N ti 0 APPROVED BY: i+ L ° 0. a) /// A ES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT c DAVID S. WILKI:SON DATE DEPARTMENT HEAD r GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Q RZ-PL20160000382—275 Morgan Road(Naftal) Rezoning Page 11 of 11 Packet Pg.2723 17.D.2 ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL ce SINGLE FAMILY (RSF-1) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MORGAN ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 750 FEET NORTH OF SABAL PALM ROAD IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 .� SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 5.7± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE ce DATE. [RZ-PL20160001132] coo 0 u•� WHEREAS, Frederick E. Hood, AICP of Davidson Engineering, representing Theodore and Nancy Naftal, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning M classification of the herein described property. Q, t. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: o SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. a a. The zoning classification of the real property more particularly described in Exhibit A, 0.1 located in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to the Residential Single Family (RSF-1) zoning district for a 5.7+ acre project, subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit B. Exhibits A and B are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The appropriate zoning atlas map orco maps, as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. E SECTION TWO: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. [16-CPS-01579/1280115/1]56 275 Morgan Road/RZ-PL20160001132 I of 2 11/7/16 Packet Pg.2724 17D.2 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2016. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk DONNA FIALA, Chairman 0 d f6 Approved as to form and legality: -0 ra ` 0 Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney r- ti Attachment: Exhibit A —Legal Description Exhibit B —Conditions of Approval M N lC .a O L U f6 C 116-CPS-01579/128011511 56 275 Morgan Road/RZ-PL20160001 132 2 of 2 11/7/16 Packet Pg.2725 17.0.2 DE Exhibit A DAVID SON ATTACHMENT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: a) THE NORTH 628.00 FEET OF THE EAST 398.50 FEET OF THE WEST 660.50 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST N QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23. THE EAST 30 FEET IS RESERVED FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OF SAID TRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. SAID TRACT OF LAND LYING CONTAINING 250,359.71 SQUARE FEET OR 5.75 ACRES MORE OR LESS. ? m 0 2 ti N l3 0 d c. O Ct. co Morgan Road(275)Rezone: Attachment"A"� Legal Description July 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com Packet Pg.;2726 17.D.2 EXHIBIT B CONDITION OF APPROVAL 1. The subject 5.75-acre property shall be limited to a maximum of two (2) lots. 0 N w t4 z co O co 7 O L c0 C J ti N N 0) 0 fC 0 0 0 d 0 0. O L a N E C) ea w a) E C) fo Q 16-CPS-01579/33 Packet Pg.2727 17.D.4 + a e:- ' 4 ....o►-u- -Lty GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION CONSISTENCY REVIEW MEMORANDUM 0 To: Eric Johnson, AICP, Principal Planner m Zoning Services SectionCe To From: Corby Schmidt,AICP, Principal Planner co Comprehensive Planning Section ? -a Date: April 15, 2016 f°o et Subject: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Consistency Review (1st memo) c ea 2) PETITION NUMBER: PL-20160001132 - REV: 1 `o 2 PETITION NAME: Naftal - Morgan Road Agricultural to Residential Rezone N REQUEST: To rezone a ±5.75-acre property from the A (Rural Agricultural) zoning district to the RSF-1 (Residential c Single Family) district, to allow for a lot split and one additional home site. el 01 N_ LOCATION: The ±5.75-acre property is located on the west side of Morgan Road, approximately 750 ft. north of Sabal Palm Road, in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. m^ a COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject property is located within the Urban designated area ce (Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict), as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use c Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). a u The present Future Land Use Map designation of Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, c o allows residential development at a maximum gross density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre(DU/A),or 2.5 DU/A through 0 the use of transfer of development rights (TDR) Credits. No TDRs are involved with this proposal. w Main Subdistrict provisions state "The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the u. Urban Designated Area and the Agricultural/Rural Area..." [The additional lot and single-family residential uses ' identified will not exceed the transitional densities of the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict.] aa) P Main Subdistrict provisions further state "Residential land uses may be allowed at a maximum base density of 1.5 c units per gross acre." [The proposed residential density of 1.0 DU/A, based upon the requested zoning district, ,»`°, will not exceed the maximum base density of the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict.] Other Subdistrict provisions are pertinent and need not be addressed here. 0) Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policy 5.4 requires new developments to be compatible with the surrounding land area. [Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review Zi of the petition in its entirety.] In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. Objective 7: -"-, In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier 1 Packet Pg.2728 17.D.4 County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [The relatively small subject site fronts a local street only so this Policy does not apply.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Given the property size, location, and land use proposed,conformance with this Policy is not feasible.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. [The relatively small subject site is proposed to develop with two lots fronting an existing local street to the east. Adjacent lots are already -a developed. Providing interconnection is not feasible.] Policy 7.4: ca The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common c open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [No deviations are requested to open space 5 or sidewalk requirements,so open space and sidewalks must be provided per the LDC. Given the size and land N uses proposed,the remainder of these development attributes would not apply.] M Based upon the above analysis,the proposed rezone may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. N as U C.) O LU L!. s PETITION ON CITYVIEW cc: David Weeks,AICP, Growth Management Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section Ray Bellows,Zoning Manager,Zoning Services Section Mike Bosi,AICP, Director,Zoning Division G: Comp\Consistency Reviews\2016 G:ICDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews\20161RZ\RZ-PL2016-1132 Naftal-Morgan Rd R1 2 Packet Pg.2729 Page 1 of 1 17.D.5 Collier County Property Appraiser EasySketch II 20 CG 1000 50 66 AG 36 11 + 1 1.540 -o 0 2 • SP 40 FIRST FLOOR N. 436 cN • SP 30 38 456 38 • GAR 5'0 cn 510 cr. 2 40 cr GROUND FLOOR Details: 2 09434360002.xm1 Sd Area Summary: (7) Code Description Area Adi. Area 01 + 1 Base Living Area 1540 15'40 GAR b0 Garage Attached 50t 1620 760 30 screened Porch 30% 456 137 SP 40 screened Porch 40% 436 174 3952 2611 Comments: 15 w E E 4.1 Sd Packet Pg.2730 http://www.collierappraisencom/main_search/Doeviewer.html?Doetype=Sketches&FolioID=00434360002... 10/14/2016 17.D.6 JohnsonEric rwnm: Jessica Harrelson <Jessica@davidsonengineering.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:56 AM To: JohnsonEric; Fred Hood Subject: RE: 275 Morgan Rd 1 1 Eric, Zi o The existing home is a non-conforming structure, however is two-stories,with the first floor being the garage area and w � cc the 2floor being the living space. Both areas are roughly+/-1520 sq ft. To The proposed construction of the additional single family home will meet County requirements. �� co Thank you. 8 cc co Jessica Harrelson En Senior Project Coordinator o E jessica@davidsonengineering.com ^w Spok .. ii 0_, c., ,..0.„_,, DAVIDSON Fs ENGINEERING E /ww dax damnenqineerng.00m Davidson Engineering, Inc. TD 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 3 ca Nmp|eo. FL 34104 Phone 239.434.6060 Fax 239.434'6084 LLI Disclaimer: This email,along with any files transmitted with it.is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review.use.retention. "6 disclosure,dissemination,forwo,mno,printing o,oapv/no of this e-mail or attachments is prohibited. N .U? ~. From:JohnsonEric [naihn:Ehdohnson@coUier0ov net] cu Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2016 3:08 PM To:Jessica Harrelson <Jessica@davidsonengineering.com>; Fred Hood <Fred@davidsonengineering.com> co Subject: RE: 275 Morgan Rd � � I'm about to send you the sin detail. ThcQGF-1 requires a two (2)-story dwelling to he at minimum, 1,800 square feet. al Zi Respectfully, Eric 1. Johnson, AICP, CFM, LEED Green Associate -"Principal Planner z �,|Packet Pg. 2721` 17. 6 From:Jessica Harrelson [maiIto:Jessicadavidsonengineering.com] Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2016 3:07 PM To:]uhnsonEric<Eridohnson@co||iergov.net>; FredHood<FredPdavidsonenRineerinA.com> ~� Subject: RE: 275 Morgan Rd Eric, I am curious as to why are requesting this information? And are you just looking for the square footage of the base living area of the home? Also, have you had a chance to look at the sign layout and location map I sent to you for review? Thanks. ra wra Jessica Harrelson Senior Project Coordinator jeasico©dsv\dspnengineehng.00m � to c.1 momm.davidomnenoineering.comn cs, Davidson Engineering, Inc. 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 Naples, FL 34104 w Phone 239.434.6060 Fax 239.434-6084 Disclaimer: This email,along with any files transmitted with it.is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review,use,retention, CI disclosure,dissemination,forwarding,printing or copying of this e-mail or attachments is prohibited. From:]nhnsonEhc [mai|to:Eridohnson@coUienzovoet] -G Sent:Tuesday, October 18, 2016 3:02 PM To: Fred Hood<Freddavidsonengineering.corn> .cf). Cc:Jessica Harrelson<Jessicadavidsonengineering.com> np Subject: RE: 275 Morgan Rd 42*cu Any success ingctting, 00cthe square footage ofthe house? Respectfully, Eric L. Johnson,AICP, CFM, LEED Green Associate Principal Planner From: Fred Hood [mailto:Fred@davidsonenineering.com1 Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 3:20 PM To:]ohnsonEric<Eridohnson§acoUieroovoet> Cc:Jessica Harrelson<Jessicadavidsonengineering.com> Subject: RE: 275 Morgan Rd 2 Packet P Eric, _Jdonthave the exact square athand, but [Usee �| can get �for you. Based on the surveythe footprint of the house is± 1,524 SF. Thanks, 1 Frederick E. Hood Senior Planner FredPdavidsomendineerinq.00m o II ce DAVIDSON z LNGINEERIN C.. -0 co xxm/m/.dovi�sonan�ineerin�.00rn ~~ Davidson Engineering, Inc. nz 4865 Radio Road,Suite#2U1 � Naples, FL 34104 2 Phone 239.434.6060 "u Fax 239.434.6084 ry o Disclaimer:This e-mail,along with any files transmitted with it,is for the sole use of the intended receipient(s). Any unauthorized review, r" use,retention,disclosure,dissemination,forwarding,printing or copying of this e-mail or attachments is prohibited. Fs ill /omn:JnhnsunEhc [mai|to:Eridnhnson@coUiergnvoet] co Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 3:16 PM 75 To: Fred Hood<FredPdavidsoneng|neeringzom> 3 o Subject: 275 Morgan Rd cri .171 Fred, R m 15 What iuthe square footage ofthe two (2)-otorydwelling onthis property? CD Respectfully, n^ Eric L. Johnson,AICP, CFM Principal Planner fa Collier County Growth Management Department :::i Zoning Division —Zoning Services Section 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 co (239) I52'2831 office +^ (239) 252'6503 fax .-~` 17.D.6 TM ..► .�r GREEN ASSOCIATE a) c 'c 0 Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request.do not send LI) electronic mail to this entity.Instead.contact this office by telephone or in writing. CC r- M Z_ .73 M 0 IX C M CA O E in N- r) M CV ctsE L1. C d 3 0 cn c :c N W O o N_ CI) GO w r 0 Z Q r_ o E U co .r .. 4 Packet Pg. 2734 17.D.7 - ,, ., ,,,,4„t___--,%,4.04--.. 1" s u} arm F f rav �- " 9 `£,b .« -ma.. ' �.;v ,t ysu Zoning MPUD . - �. -�4 cs �7 'f-* Tse -��- '.. -E t :�fier'7— n { Hacien'da4 , , . ERN To[ :�" ., � Dense .y40.8t " 441.-;-,,,,71 ° 7 t -� ,._ ......-,.�, - .& r .�tom'- '1...,,,!? , " 'P°� sk 1 \ t�� 4 � `' .,,_ter �k' ^ t ",,,,Lor,:,. .,',-,', `�'.� r• f x'l �� ""� '£ �, �; CP rsi �`a _-, A'''' O 1,).s� -y'17 a. '°- 43',k • -�•} y`,,r,*o,' F a 3 '" title a", �Zoneng RP1& -- y, „ y 1- ,� ��, _ Rockedge61 z { -• �� '" .., '- R°°, r ...;�:3 r F AL- 4 ,.:,ts+ r" - ar s'.r^ r '4 s` O ms tri Dens�ty-�1 5 �„�,;Y �..YY,� i -��y 1 �,� �f ° � ,-.4-t----_-_.„ --..--,,,'.-.,;-,----,...!'„,' � � 3 t_ Y� � N y�� lMj'<b"x C �.�.^" �^, eat.-. �'-� �:-0.- „:dr ":� t ",-,,,t',.-.".;•''''.•?' � � it,- -�. . �Q/� # �� . _ � z `n #; SUBJECT PROPERTY y grEk � � }' I MORGAN RD (RZ) , , 4 �c fir'°' �, t � F x +3 -0.+i "C rsx C' �. ,-..-,7?- � i:::,;--:',,,,.7:; ,,, � 7 e� Z 3 i a a , — 3rd t ". "s, a + , 1. + r � az Ce rs ,,z,,s. 3$ < 'r�. ?r" ''-- ”! x�"e + ��' { i�"' ;, '...:1:1,1,,,,,,,,r-,,- �i«ar "� yin-'XEs:. M'7 -��+. �'' ?ry ikr- .. m '!..,,;.r; Yn:'e� �'� L"hf".Y. _ -� '!� "Y�v: .{f r vb E""S AA., +}K ':1 ��H!C T 4M 4 . a - :- � ,- rz w X18 densityg1 • -tr r i Z �,, v #� + fid` +� ��" k;'-:1"..,,,.,,,1 0 sr,` +` aWNfs- �r w,;,,,-,,..,..,-',_?3,0„-::� =.t, �.� • r ,ase `:�s> r'� ,.��.-.--,,,.._-,.....,,,-,f..,,,,..-_,..-...- ': t • a�# �� z ;� ;� N PetyT. ; �', .'�/ .rk • Q 1,,crta..'• r'+•'r r. „ "`�`",°y��q^,a�{ '''*' J .+;q .. • :• 7: 4* st r",s� Z •.x :�� - , .,%,,,_c„--1.--,-,..„:,!tz; -_c,�'ts �" 4 •4"' �'„', X :iFc+s.t M CI; X r-475,-/c.Qt (0 "`yr �.r g C F • x . :.•.; cz t Q ],�� 3 q+ sa --'++:''''. .:'4' --x1. S._ :C "eY' C� ., A F'1I. • c;1,,,-,•;., ` 11'''-i: ',-,-. j: r f {''.}1•4!i;,--..,"T 'dY rj�.! f - I 6 7"x e)t... 't a -''`.4,:i...:3.,,,1:-;-,:14 .2.-,-.4).-.7-: e l�y `",,,,w _ .4;r .rera-..11a•-•-A.1-..t-411-",-,:"-7,-;•.=---,•••-er -., i eg 4� t i.3:� E4.: � t E a p®7.a $r. . 'n +w ' '3.„ ls� f "�:s ',ri , t •kiu w:. R w. r ••-•.:' ,,. O E` tiles '''''''• h3. x. `. �iy r'-ry y ,,,7_..� r +s�:c is ;.:-h-,1647.-1,-.`;f. • k_ 3 -.r ,,: ., C 'i,.= t.,l r.. ,. 3` r ! -11 p;-•'",:-..1', "„`.,.x Ci .x"r" 9 7 s` 'a ,.Y. 7 I ' 1,-,-11-/t;�, '^x' �-�� ,' �! ��6?.�+� A. �'� �„.1..1 ;' L� .�, '� ��hx a � �''*��? x�� sF,ylF'�' 1,3-.,:::,:...Y. (� .e�`�a -�i ' P • $" �,.r ar..- eF"zy' , �".: 4 �. iFt „., '+c «:. ,'. +rr7i co �,.•,, F •':—The., , fi f ` ee 'h ,. A. r mar+t as ' ; '. t * .v0001;;: k .IO�//� - r�'S� t�Ff t9 �,. 1 • �^� ' .pq„ 1` "} 'Yd}t 4,,,' E ,� hilgrlilii 'Mp, - i'i• r. - T ' w !iliNifiligi ► .�rr � Z®n�ng PUDE `; A : ; o� m Flac�enda�Lakes as ,_c7id Winding=Cypress �`° t� 3.M � �-'--4.- Vin. .u� � --7; i -1 ()_e � �rc• � '4,,,../.„,,,:4:'.'-.):, a>a �� --w „i zF �.. O 'tr. � �'.,�•„re•'"'.fi� 'n°s +" wa`•�,q, -,,,,-0.0*- 'E. �` ` 4„, 0TH s. �� • .` _ �mj 00,4 • � ' GROSS DENSITY UNITS PER ACRE (UPA) N FOR MORGAN RD (RZ) AND ° 5° 30° 6°° 9°° SURROUNDING PROPERTIES Fee: Packet Pg. 2735 17.D.8 Naples Baitu Nitus , NapiesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication a State of Floridac 1 Counties of Collier and Lee 0 W Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published z in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published .0 at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published o in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- c ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid a, nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this o advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 2 Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# N BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT 1324912 PUBLIC HEARING 45-172052 M M N Pub Dates c October 28,2016 lizo c) 0 z To co a) J oo ..- co a) F U co Zr.' J C a) V .r+ � Q (Sign ture of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me 4 ;o,z;;: .,;;.,, IVONNE ORI This Novemb 04,2016 + r ,,,,....: Notary Public •State of Florida 0 ' 1 c Commission S FF 900870 ;? ed My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 a ' '''4'o,':d'' Banded through National Notary Assn. ,tq' i. (Signatur of affiant) ' Packet Pg.2736 17.D.8.'..... Naples Daily News Friday,October 28,2016 23, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE 3 Notice is hereby given that a public heanng will be held by the Collier County Planning f - Commission at 950 A.M.,on Thursday,November 17,2016,in the Board of Count) y,r Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiam fr - IA= z ,i Trail East,Naples FL,to consider. d e1. 'er' t"ur - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIEF E €^i * ..a- e frarrr. .3 COUNTY.FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.2004-41,AS AMENDED,THE V #i y'�ry COWER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE CO COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF - ' t A MAP OR MAPCOWER COUNTY, CHANGING THEFLORIDA BY ENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF HE HEREIN ING ATLAF. (1.3 Z :1 DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY IRSF-1)FOR PROPERTY LOCATE[ CD o r. C ON THE WEST SIDE OF MORGAN ROAD,APPROXIMATELY 750 FEET NORTH OF AC SABAL PALM ROAD IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST Q .- COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,CONSISTING OF 5.70 ACRES;AND BY PROVIDING 'C W se" - AN EFFECTIVE DATE.)RZ-PL20180001132) o = U o rwww N tie Cir) —1 L era- £$ M co ABOM TINE vAsiu ; :eS Rattlesnake Hammock RD 03 Q N Modern criminal target Americans both from inside our borders and from broad,AssistantP Z Z < a Attorney General Leslie Caldwell says. Feds charge dozens in IRS \, agent immigration scam O All interested parties are malted to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposec O KEVIN JOHNSON living abroad.The court documents also ORDINANCE will be made available for Inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office N AA TODAY outlined charges against five call center fourth floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 401 I operations. Nadas•FL,one week pnor to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filec 0 WASHINGTON-Federal authorities "This is a transnational problem,and with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,pnor to Thursday,November 17.. unsealed an indictment Thursday chars- demonstrates that modern criminals tar- ing 56 people in a vast scheme in which get Americans both from inside our bor- 0 0 suspects posed as Internal Revenue Ser- ders and from abroad,"Assistant Attor- I a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Cl) l vice agents and immigration authorities ney General Teske Caldwell said of the Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or heanng,he oil.5 0 .. to siphon more than$300 million from three-year investigation. need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that E w a) 0 0 V thousands of unwitting victims. The co-conspirators, according to verbatim record of the proceedings Is made,which record Includes the testimony ant O The scheme,which employed a net- federal authorities,used so-called"ha- evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. m > 0"CS CD 0 C/ ) work of telephone call centers based in wala transfers"in which money is trans- K = you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order it India,relied on personal information ob- ferred internationally outside of the for- participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of Q < Ci) 0 tamed from data brokers to target at mal banking system to direct extorted certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division 1 Ieast15,000 victims with threats of fines, funds to accounts belonging to US: located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-e deportation or imprisonment if they did based individuals. 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the heannl e not pay fees to clear fictitious deporta- In the case of a San Diego victim, impaired am available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. z tion warrants and phony tax debts. prosecutors allege that a call center ex- e In the thousands of cases where vic- toned$12.300 from the 85-year-old wmm- Fi rims did agree to settle the fictitious ac- an after threatening her with arrest if Collier County Planning Commission `o counts,the money allegedly was lawn- she did not settle phony tax violations. Mark Strain,Chairman 2 dered through groups of U.S.co-conspir- The same day that the payment was Fn C atnrs using wire transfers and debit made,a U.S.-based suspect allegedly sir -- cards. loaded a debit card in the amount of the 14) Twenty of the 24 US.suspects have payment to purchase money orders in 'n .^, N been arrested,officials said Thursday Frisco,Texas. October 2i1;207$ No.1324B11 Thirty-two suspects were believed to he N 01 0 r XS Cr) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO .ft IlD NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE s= N Q V Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Z° ▪ Z CIZ Commission at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,November 17,2016,in the Board of County Nob.„ prow o, Meta N...herons wase mkt by tn.Cine,Cow.Nan..C,anmi.ien..mins.Iv Te Commissioner's Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami Imes warn,per,em..tie Enee,rwnel stirs.,crawleten.e.M..onmu,.4sy,Nerentb.,ir.00te.i, o' Trail East,Naples FL,to consider: me Sloe.or crony cenmaionera Meeting Reem,llnN hoe,,cine,Government center,3000 Semen Tres East-' L N AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLDER N'NwrL.m°"ma` es ,a COUNTY,FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.95-74,THE NAPLES HERITAGE E GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,AND AMENDING AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COWER COUNTY,FLORIDA uehstt IC E ORDINANCE NO.2004.41,THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, oRdNCE NUMBER 81-is,COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE REGENCY AUTOHAULA s PLANNED UNn f,0 ru BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING DEVELOPMENT,BY DELETING PROVISIONS RELATING To REBTOMTKTS OF WETLAND SITE AND ALLOY 19, Q) ZTHE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 5.210 ACRES OF LAND ZONED oFFsnE PRESERVATION of NATIVE VEGETATION TO Acc0MMOMTE Auvnel PARKING ON TRACT o;a1 E AWING TWO ACCESS ROADS`,DELETINGdi1DATE0 PROVISIONS.BY ADDING 5' E C >5 RURAL AGRICULTURAL(E TO NAPLES HERBAGE ADDINGN AND E COUNTRY TI'N AR PUD; c O_ �-- BY REVISING THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION,BY A RECREATION AREA TO RELATING TO OFFSITE PRESERVES.USABLE OPEN SPACE AND ARCHITECTURAL bTANMRp6;BY REVISING E 0 TRACT A;BY REVISING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS;BY AMENDING THE MASTER THE MASTER PIAN To REcosvoiiaE THE co-nice AND RETENTION AREA AND DEPICT THE PARKING.. nv Z N N 0 PLAN;BY ADDING A TENNIS CENTER CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND A LANDSCAPE WATER MANAGEMENT AREA,By DELETING FIGURES AND ATTACHMENTS;BY CORRECTING ACREAGE OF THE g -0 U) N 0 BUFFER EXHIBIT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, PROJECT FROM 1.8 ACRES TO 15.1.1 ACRES AND By PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.THE mortem B G Q C co o CONSISTING OF 583re ACRES,IS LOCATED SOUTH OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND WEST LOCATED ON THE EAST 310E OF AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD.NOmH OF HAZEL ROAD AND SOUTH OF WEST,. OF COWER BOULEVARD IN SECTIONS 3,4,9 AND 10,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH.RANGE DONE IN SECTION 1,TOWNSHIP m SOUTH.,RANGE n EAST,cowER COUNTY FLORIDA CONSISTING Si 26 EAST,COWER COUNTY,FLORIDA)PUDZ-PL20150001416) 15.He ACRES.IPEmsw PDM-Pt.n1ie001B36l o.w sethe isms '' PROJECT prleft k'l 3 ' /f` 7 � �IDCATION �'- h �.s ler” Ie � i iD z_""" � 1 -� All interested panies are invent to appear and be heard. Copies or the proposed ORDINANCE ♦/� All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed vin be made available for inspection m the color County delis oxine,fourth floor Collier count) tE u::s ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office, Government Cerner,3299 East Tamiami Trail,suite 401,Naples,FL one week pnor to the scheduler ifourth floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East.Suite 401, hearing.Wnnan comments must be Ned with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,pnor v Q O Naples,FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed Thursday,November 17,2018. with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,November 17, Om. ' N 2016. it a person decides to appeal any derision made by the Comer County Planning eommeaion with ttet6 respect to any matter considered at such meeting or neamg,he wN need a record of that proceeding ent If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning and for such purpose he may need 10 ensure Theta verbatlm r000 or the proceedings is made,which 4 Jk CD M need Commission eior with respecttroto any matter such purposeuasuch he meeting or hearing,he that wit 000d includes the testimony and evidence upon whim the appeal a to be based. Z 1��7 W need a record of that proceeding,and for such he may need to ensure a N verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and If you are a person with a disabllty who needs any accommodatnn in order to paniapate in trot ..j' i U. evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. proceeding.you are entitled,at no cost to you.to Me pmvbion of certain assimance.Please contacttm r**, CD CD you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to Collier Courcy Facilities Management Division,located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suee 101,Naples,Ft > r W participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days pnor to the meeting.emceed listening devices force 41ra _ certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, neanng impaired are available in Me Board or County commissioners Office. +F�' C2located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252- 4.Gi/k 0 8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing comer Courcy Planning Commission impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioner's Office. Mark Strain,Chairman `I 0 Collier County Planning Commission Wit 0 Mark Strain,Chairman October 28,2016 ND-1324933 October 28,2016 No.132495E einsmet >1 100449 `V it,,,i t Li- Packet Pg.2737 17.D.8 Petition No. RZ-PL20160001132 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE FOR PROVIDING INDIVIDUAL MAIL NOTICE TO AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS 1. I hereby certify that pursuant to Subsections 10.03.05.B.8 and 10.03.05.B.10 of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did give c notice of the public hearing before the Collier County Planning Commission scheduled for November 17, 2016. by U.S. mail to the affected property owners at the addresses provided to me by the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office on October 28. 2016. A copy of the list of addresses from the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office is attached to this Affidavit. a ti N 2. Copies of the letters mailed to the affected property owners are attached to M this Affidavit. II Dated this day of /V110.64,tae 7016. " U w+ O aS J co Signature r _ r—e Print Name to v' � a : Print Title °1cts 4- Q l of 2 Packet Pg. 2738 17.D.8 STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) ss COUNTY OF COLLIER) BEFORE ME, a duly authorized notary of the State of Florida, personally appeared , who is personally known to me or produced 1 c r'1se as identification, and under oath stated that the above is true and correct •c and to the best of his/her knowledge. DATED this 3 day of Nei' , 2016. Ta solt mit 1/04, 6)(--4-‘/"Z ‘.\\.‘'0\DIAM0A.1/ Notary, State of Florida c. ,1 '�?o•' t hfoc mond = *• "''''" • *: Notary Printed Name y . •% FF99Bit4 k.' s" o q-q '-•0tertstST:•• ♦ M • '6'/CisTtll ^�. My commission expires: y a) a) co CIS v r.. a)d lC 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 2739 17.D.8 COLLIER COUNTY Growth Management Department October 19, 2016 Dear Property Owner: This is to advise you that because you may have interest in the proceedings or you own property located within 500 feet (urban areas) or 1,000 feet (rural areas) of the following described property, that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on November 17, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL., to consider: ifs) An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as 'E amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the ct zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to the Residential To Single Family(RSF-1) for property located on the west side of Morgan Road, approximately 750 feet north of Sabal Palm z Road in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 5.7± acres; and by ,� providing an effective date. [RZ-PL20160001132] You are invited to appear and be heard at the public hearing. You may also submit your comments in writing. as NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 u MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE Zi WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL c A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS f.1 INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY STAFF MEMBER NOTED Elk. BELOW, A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN r PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, Z which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. as m If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days i prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County 2 Commissioners Office. cr This petition, and other pertinent information related to this petition, is kept on file and may be reviewed at the Growth .. Management Department building located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Please contact the 'E 'a member noted below at (239)-252-2931 to set up an appointment if you wish to review the file. E o Sincerely, Eric L. Johnson,AICP,CFM,LEED Green Associate Principal Planner Packet Pg.2740 (6uluozae{ (Ie}}eN) peoa ue6iow SLz : 0££z) suol;eo!JI;oN le6ai - g;uawi apt/ :;uaunpefy ti O IN tr 0 w i-------- .....____ 11..1 I [.... ... _ _ E - 2 u as CL to V O _ J Cy6 ! 6 E ! 6 Q E ca E 6 n . '.6* .4 c B 6 6 / oma �© N 0 &- ® 6 E 6 4417 fr, ,, 41111t = tt 6 ,1t 417 X �r CO 6 �m Be e 6 I I I I e .- O U 6 'nifty iic., N o ,ter, , A 1 J z !CLCUL) L Y> = N Z M ~ z O W E:. 0 cD • a +- .4—.E O a _1Q 0- T O 0_ N T 03 N i C O o ,� O �i O QA18 JailloD CO N O a> 0ai 0 Et Eco _ 2 3 76 .r E c) 0 0 17.D.9 ---, ,,,,,,,:i'm 4‘7.,'",,,,.nr,g.ait,.',t, ,-.4...4...k ,ev•41-14.0*. .1K .7%. 1.- NOTICE OF[UBLIC HEARINGNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday,December 13, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor, Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: c The purpose of the hearing is to consider: 0 N cu AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY De COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2064-41, AS AMENDED, Ta 1 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, NI c r. WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING en co REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA CJ Z OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE 'a APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING co ra THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED D.. = 0 REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ro Ce ..,- ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY a. c (RSF-1) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF13) t< as MORGAN ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 750 FEET NORTFI OF z 0 SABAL PALM ROAD IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, o 0 RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,CONSISTING < m * OF 5.7± ACRES;AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3 In IP,Z-PL201500011321 o- t-- al CN Ni A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the .l-kI CZ NJ el,........, Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are cp re, invited to attend and be heard. cri e• Z NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must co 0 register with the County manager prior to presentation of "I5 cil cie) the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be ic CN limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual vi CI f:1 to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. iv — . If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or co organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. iZ Ts Z c co cu Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in ca the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall 0 be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of cc seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in Ta presentations before the Board will become a permanent part Ca of the record. a) _I Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board .;..; will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and c therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the a) proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and E evidence upon which the appeal is based. -c c.) co lf you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation ,„_,... in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at < no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Manaotitment Division, located at 2335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Flables.FL 34112 5356 (239) 252-5380. al least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA CHAIRMAN DONNA FIALA DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK By:Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) ,..---•-•. November 23,2016 No.1364047 Packet Pg. 2742 C-rOmW COLLIER COUNW GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVK NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 12391252-2400 Pre-Ap Petition Type: plication Meeting Notes REZN Date and 1i,ng. June 2, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. Engineering Manager (for PPIJs and FP's): Project lnformation Proj ect Name: 275 Morgan Road (Naftal) Pr #. 201 60001 132 Proj ect Address: 275 Morgan Road City . Naples state: FL zip: - Appl ,."n.. Davidson Engineering, lnc. Atent Name:Jessica Harrelson p1ron". 239-434-6060 4365 Radio Rd #201 City . Naples state: FL zip. 34104Agent/Firm Address: Property o*n"r. Theodore and Nancy Naftal, Jr Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage:5.75 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: _ iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: _ iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: v. lf there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. lf the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PI#: Assigned o|"nn"r' Eric Johnson C-,ounty COtt|ER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 123912s2-24O0 Meeting Notes Rezone oJ 5.75 prop€rty lrom A to RSF-1. A MinorSubdvision Plallo splilth€ parcelinlo 2 separate lols willrun simuhan€ous y wilh th6 R€zon6 Applicalion tL t"l TQ ?z)oe fura 0 P caLt j" fuF-l . S,ri ?*s l ll-* f .,, l9I('\ o Qa'rc AJ Yl^rr rQ2art- I Ct'rcr-e.-.L\t rr., C.; rn (\-rs,--l r,\ . I CYI l C,ounty 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVI NAPTES, FLORIDA 34104 (2?91252-24oo FAx: (239) 252-635a Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Standard Rezone chapter 3 H. of the Administrative code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to b application submittai. At time of submittal, the chec packet. Please provide the submittal items in the ex section. lncomplete submittals will not be accepted. lf located in RFMU (Rural Frinse Mixed Use) Receivins Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-590-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." e utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of klist is to be completed and submitted with the application act order listed below, with cover sheels attached to each eLlcr@io REqUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED completed Application (download current form from county website)20 x Pre-Application meeting notes 20 Project Narrative 20 r Warranty Deeds 3 Utility Provisions Statement with sketches 4 Signed and Sealed Survey 4 I Conceptua I Site Plan 20 Architectural Rendering x List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 A z i n s ned and notariz 2 X Completed Add ressin eCh ec klist 2 A Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 3 X Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. lnclude copies of previous surveys 3 u Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraised with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial.M Historical Survey or waiver request 4 Traffic lmpact Statement, with applicable fees 7 School lmpact Analysis Application - residential projects only 2 x Electronic copy of all documents and plans 2 *lf located in lmmokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 613/2074 Page 9 of 10 COTTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.collierPov.net tr __EI- tr ---Er mtq((SoPts C-atmW COTTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 12391252-240[J FAx: (239) 2s2-63s8 Planners: lndicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following additional reviewers: FEE REQUIREMENTS I Pre-Application Meeting: 5500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre-application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre-application meeting will be required) ! Rezone Petition (regular): 55,000.00 plus 525.00 an acre (or fraction thereof) o Additional Fee for 5'h and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: S750.00 L Listed/Protected Species Survey: 5t,OoO.oo f Estimated Legal Advertising:!r ccPc-$Ds€a il)t'x Bcc- ss00.00 L Transportation Fee: o Methodology Review: S5OO.O0 (Additional fees to be determined at Methodology meeting) ( 6D ( School Concurencl Review: lf required, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County All checks poyable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 f Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Executive Director tr Historical Review City of Naples: Robin 5inger, Planning Director I mmokalee Water/sewer District: Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad tr Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie 8ay tr School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock Other:Other: 6/3/2014 Page 10 of 10 C-wmW COttIER COUNW GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FtORtDA 34104 123912s2-24OO Pre-Application Meeting Sign-ln Sheet PL #: 20160001132 Collier County contact lnformation: Name Review Discipline Phone Email I X oavid lnthony EnvironmentalReview 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net 5u mmer Araque EnvironmentalReview 252-6290 sum merbrownaraque@colliergov.net Steve Baluch, P.E Transportation Planning 252-2367 StephenBaluch@colliergov.net x.Laurie Beard Transportation Pathways 252-5782 Lau riebeard@colliergov. net L Rachel Beasley Pla n ner 252-8202 rachelbeasley@colliergov.net Marcus Berman County Surveyor 25 2-688s MarcusBerman@colliergov.net r Madelin Bunster Architectural Review 252-8523 madelinbunster@colliergov.net Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5L65 markburtchin@colliergov. net f George Cascio utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio@colliergov.net Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton @colliergov. net Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-57t5 suefaulkner@colliergov,net ! Eric Fey, P.E Site Plans Reviewer 252-2434 ericfey@co llie rgov. n et Paula Fleishman lmpact Fee Administration 257-2924 paulaf leishman@colliergov.net Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 na ncygu nd lach @colliergov. net . Shar Hingson East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.org I John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov. net I Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes@coll iergov.net Alicia H u mphries Site Plans Reviewer/ROW 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net Eric lohnson, AICP,CFM Zoning Services 2s2-293t ericjohnson@colliergov.net Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 ma rcia ken da ll@co llie rgov. net L Stephen Lenberger EnvironmentalReview 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov. net !Paulo Martins utilities 252-424s pau loma rtins@colliergov. net - Thomas Mastroberto Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net Jack McKenna, P.E.L Engineering Services 252-2977 jackmckenna@colliergov.net !Matt Mclean, P.E Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility lmpact Fees 252-421,5 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov. net Annis Moxam Add ressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net Stefanie Nawrocki Planning and ZoninB 252-23t3 Stefa n ieN awrocki@ colliergov. net I Mariam ocheltree Gra phics 252-237s ma ria mocheltree@colliergov. net ;l Brandy otero 252-5859 brandyotero@colliergov. net I - Marcia Kendall Tra n sit Crwmty COLTIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov. net Additional Attendee Contact lnformation: 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORTDA 34104 123912s2-24OO I Brandi Pollard Utility lmpact fees 252-6231 brandipollard@colliergov.net / Fred Reischl, AlcP Zoning Services f redreischl@colliergov.net Stacy Revay Transportation Pathways 252-5677 stacyrevay@colliergov.net I Brett Rosenblum, P.E Utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net Michael Sawyer Zoning Services 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov. net d Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net Chris Scott, AICP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net Daniel Smith, AICP Landscape Review 252-4372 danielsmith@colliergov.net l- Ellen Summers Planning and Zoning 252-1032 Ellen5ummers@colliergov.net Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net f- Mark Strain Hea ring Exa miner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@col liergov.net Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen@colliergov.net lon Walsh Building Review jonathanwa lsh@col liergov.net I David Weeks, AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov. net Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 2 5 2-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5148 Ch ristineWillough by@co lliergov, net Name Representing Phone Email ,ftI r txrD N ut 61t'.l4B4N\r t#t.tr"l @{N},e DA^JrCISotu.UrJ@,t t t,,fatUp, rr.ro0lWtfO 'wr),rr,* l4--A €,rlr: )-,,,*s.,,^tt < . .1t. t:L c-d, ?r"?dV Oru"t r,/o d UI/"'()/- L) b 2 t-t - )1L\",^-,.^1-.t^ .L,.. I I utl,o';,'r. ^vt 252-4277 252-2962 t, .a.22 - E3 !.-61{r E:E 8 .9 "* ? :"; E; h fi I I i It { t --".--^""" :E tl Jr--] \ oi .L90 =E o3 o-;E,P -lE *ntaXY 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (23s12s2-24OO FAX (239) 2s2-s724 ADDRESSING CHECKTIST Please complete the following and email to G lvl D_Add ressing@colliergov. net or fax to the Operations Division at239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressinq oersonnel prior to pre-application eetino olease allory 3 davs for Drocessino Not all items will apply to every prqect. ltems in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (lndicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) E BL (Blasting Permit) E BD (Boat Dock Extension) ! Carnival/Circus Permit E CU (Conditional Use) E EXP (Excavation Permit) E FP (Final Plat n LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) E PNC (Project Name Change) E PPL (Plans & Plat Review) E PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) E PUD Rezone E RZ (Standard Rezone) E SDP (Site Development Plan) ! SDPA (SDP Amendment) n SDPI (lnsubstantial Change to SDP) E SIP (Site lmprovement Plan) E SlPl (lnsubstantial Change to SIP) E SNR (Street Name Change) E SNC (Street Name Change - Unplatted) E TDR (Transfer of Oevelopment Rights) E VA (Variance) E VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) E VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit)fl orHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be aftached) 23 50 26 N 628FT OF E 398.50FT OF W 660.50FT OF SE1/4 0F SE1/4 STREET ADDRESS or ADORESSES (as applbable, if already assigned) 275 Morgan Road . LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of projecvsite in relation to nearest public road right- of-way . SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PRO JECI NAME (if applicable) 275 Morgan Road PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (forexisting pAects/sites only) SDP - orAR or PL # COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov,net FOLIO (Property lD) NUMBER(S) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal desciption if more than one) 00434360002 Qounty 28OO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 l23sl2s2-240o FAX (239) 2s2-s724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By:E Email E Fax Personally picked up Applicant Name: Jessica Harrelson, Davidson Engineering, lnc Phone: 239.434.6060 Email/Fax: jessica@davidsonengineering.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY FolioNumber 00434360002 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED COLTIER COUNW GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www,collierAov.net 4* Unl- _Date, 5/25/20161- 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 ▪ Naples, FL 34104 ▪ P (239) 434.6060 ▪ F (239) 434.6084 www.davidsonengineering.com Collier County Growth Management July 20, 2016 Attn: Client Services 2800 N Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Morgan Road (275) Rezone PL20160001 132 1st Review To Whom It May Concern, The purpose of this rezone application is to convert the ±5.75 acre parcel from Rural Agricultural District (A) zoning to Residential Single Family (RSF-1). The approval of the rezone may allow for further permitting in the form of a Minor Subdivision Plat, to split the ±5.75 acre parcel into two separate ±2.875 acre parcels. There are currently existing non-conforming structures at the northwest section of the property. These structures shall remain in their existing condition as legal non-conforming structures. The combined Rezone and future Minor Subdivision Plat approvals will enable for the construction of an additional single family home on the southern portion of the existing parcel which will meet all development standards of the resultant zoning designation. It should be noted that there are several properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property that do not meet the minimum sizing requirement of the A-Agricultural District and therefore this rezone will not create property sizes inconsistent with parcels in the area. We have included the following items for review and approval: 1. Twenty (20) copies of the Cover Letter, including Project Narrative 2. Twenty (20) copies of the Pre Application Meeting Notes 3. Twenty (20) copies of the Rezone Application 4. Twenty (20) copies of Attachment “A” – Legal Description 5. Twenty (20) copies of Attachment “B” – Narrative and Evaluation Criteria 6. Three (3) copies of the Warranty Deed 7. Four (4) copies of the Utility Provisions Statement 8. Four (4) copies of the Boundary/Topographic Survey 9. One (1) original and one (1) copy of the Affidavit/ Letter of Authorization 10. Two (2) copies of the Addressing Checklist 11. Five (5) copies of the FLUCCS Map 12. Seven (7) copies of the Traffic Impact Statement 13. Two (2) CDs containing all documents being submitted 14. Check in the amount of $7,825 - $6,000 Application Fee - $150 ($25 /acre at 6 acres) - $750 Comprehensive Planning - $925 CCPC - $500 BCC - ($500) Pre Application Meeting Credit Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me at (239)434- 6060 or by email at fred@davidsonengineering.com. Sincerely, Frederick E. Hood, AICP Senior Planner COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STANDARD REZONE APPLICATION LDC Section 10.02.08 Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ____________________________________________________________________ Firm: _____________________________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ___________________ Cell: ______________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application, if space is inadequate, attach on separate page: x If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; x The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and x The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ To be completed by staff 6/3/2014 Page 1 of 10 Theodore and Nancy Naftal, Property Owners 275 Morgan Road Naples FL 34114 239.394.2238 capttedjr@gmail.com Frederick E. Hood, AICP Davidson Engineering, Inc. 4365 Radio Rd, Suite 201 Naples FL 34104 239.434.6060 239.434.6084 fred@davidsonengineering.com 23 50 26 00434360002 See attached Survey and Attachment "A"- Legal Description See Attachment "A" - Legal Description COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Size of Property: ________ft. x ________ ft. = _________ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: ________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Section/Township/Range: / / Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: ________________________________________________________ REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: ______________________ Zoning district(s) to the _____________________ zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the subject property: __________________________________ Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. 6/3/2014 Page 2 of 10 varies 250470varies 5.75 275 Morgan Road A Developed single family residential A Developed single family residential A Developed single family residential A Developed single family residential A RSF-1 Single Family Residential Single Family Residential COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATON Please complete the following information, if space is inadequate use additional sheets and attach to the completed application packet. a.If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 10 Theodore & Nancy Naftal 100% 275 Morgan Road Naples, FL 34114 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _______________ Leased: Term of lease ____________ years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: _________________________ Date option terminates: __________________, or Anticipated closing date: ________________ h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 6/3/2014 Page 4 of 10 Quick Claim Deed dated 12.29.2010 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC section 10.02.08, staff’s recommendation to the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, please provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, future land use map and elements of the Growth Management Plan. 2. The existing land use pattern. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment (rezone) when necessary. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. 6/3/2014 Page 5 of 10 N/A See Attachment "B" - Narrative & Evaluation Criteria COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended]. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the board of county commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No if so please provide copies. 6/3/2014 Page 6 of 10 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Standard Rezone Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 20 Pre-Application meeting notes 20 Project Narrative 20 Warranty Deeds 3 Utility Provisions Statement with sketches 4 Signed and Sealed Survey 4 Conceptual Site Plan 20 Architectural Rendering List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Completed Addressing Checklist 2 Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 3 Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys 3 Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. Historical Survey or waiver request 4 Traffic Impact Statement, with applicable fees 7 School Impact Analysis Application – residential projects only 2 Electronic copy of all documents and plans 2 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.” 6/3/2014 Page 9 of 10 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following additional reviewers: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Historical Review City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock Other: Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 (Applications submitted 9 months or more after the date of the last pre-application meeting shall not be credited towards application fees and a new pre-application meeting will be required) Rezone Petition (regular): $6,000.00 plus $25.00 an acre (or fraction thereof) o Additional Fee for 5th and subsequent reviews: 20% of original fee Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $750.00 Listed/Protected Species Survey: $1,000.00 Estimated Legal Advertising: o CCPC- $925.00 o BCC- $500.00 Transportation Fee: o Methodology Review: $500.00 (Additional fees to be determined at Methodology meeting) School Concurrency Review: If required, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 6/3/2014 Page 10 of 10 Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [¥] type of application request (one only): [ ] School Capacity Review [ ] Exemption Letter [ ] Concurrency Determination [ ] Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I. Project Information: Project Name:___________________________________________ Municipality:_________________________________ Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): _______________________________________________________ Location/Address of subject property: ____________________________________________________ (Attach location map) Closest Major Intersection: _______________________________________________________________________________ II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s): _____________________________________________________________________ Agent/Contact Person: ________________________________________________________________________________ (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone#: _____________________________ Fax: _________________________Email_________________________ I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. _____________________________________________________ _____________________________ Owner or Authorized Agent Signature Date _________________________________________________________________________________________ III.Development Information Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Proposed Land Use Designation: Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Project Acreage: Unit Type:SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: Total Units Proposed by Type: Is this a phased project: Yes or No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp:___________________________ MORGAN ROAD (275) REZONE COLLIER COUNTY 00434360002 275 MORGAN ROAD The nearest monitored roadway, per the 2015 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report, is Link 35.0͈ Collier Boulevard (CR951) between Rattlesnake Hammock Road (CR864) and Tamiami Trail (US41). NANCY AND THEODORE NAFTAL, PROPERTY OWNERS FREDERICK E. HOOD, AICP, DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC. 4365 RADIO ROAD, SUITE 201, NAPLES, FL 34104 239.434.6060 239.434.6084 FRED@DAVIDSONENGINEERING.COM 7-20-2016 DEVELOPED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL "A" REZONE REQUEST SUBMITTED FOR RSF-1 ZONING RSF-1 1 2 ✔ 5.75 ACRES (TO BE SPLIT INTO 2 SEPARATE 2.875 ACRE PARCELS) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR STANDARD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: __________ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: _________________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): ________________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: _________________________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: ____________ Average Daily: ____________ B. Sewer-Peak: ____________ Average Daily: ____________ 6/3/2014 Page 7 of 10 Theodore and Nancy Naftal, Property Owners 275 Morgan Road Naples FL 34114 239.394.2238 capttedjr@gmail.com 275 Morgan Road Naples FL 34114 23 50 26 00434360002 See attached Survey and Attachment "A"- Legal Description X X Single family household 1,350 GPD 300 GPD 1,350 GPD 300 GPD COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 H. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 6/3/2014 Page 8 of 10 N/A The existing facilities function utilizing a well and septic system for all utility usage. There is no proposed connection to County utilities. Morgan Road (275) Rezone: Attachment “A” Legal Description July 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com ATTACHMENT “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE NORTH 628.00 FEET OF THE EAST 398.50 FEET OF THE WEST 660.50 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23. THE EAST 30 FEET IS RESERVED FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OF SAID TRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. SAID TRACT OF LAND LYING CONTAINING 250,359.71 SQUARE FEET OR 5.75 ACRES MORE OR LESS. Morgan Road (275) Rezone: Attachment “B” Narrative & Evaluation Criteria July 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com 1 ATTACHMENT “B” NARRATIVE & EVALUATION CRITERIA Narrative The purpose of this rezone application is to convert the ±5.75 acre parcel from Rural Agricultural District (A) zoning to Residential Single Family (RSF-1). The approval of the rezone may allow for further permitting in the form of a Minor Subdivision Plat, to split the ±5.75 acre parcel into two separate ±2.875 acre parcels. There are currently existing non-conforming structures at the northwest section of the property. These structures shall remain in their existing condition as legal non-conforming structures. The combined Rezone and future Minor Subdivision Plat approvals will enable for the construction of an additional single family home on the southern portion of the existing parcel which will meet all development standards of the resultant zoning designation. It should be noted that there are several properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property that do not meet the minimum sizing requirement of the A-Agricultural District and therefore this rezone will not create property sizes inconsistent with parcels in the area. Evaluation Criteria 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, future land use map and elements of the Growth Management Plan. Response: The proposed rezone from Rural Agricultural District (A) zoning to Residential Single Family (RSF-1) is consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan under the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict. The parcel is located within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict and is ± 5.75 acres in size. The subject property is bound on its northern, southern and western boundaries by Rural Agricultural District (A) zoned parcels, consisting of constructed single family homes. The subject property abuts Morgan Road on its eastern boundary, with additional Rural Agricultural District (A) zoned parcels across the Morgan Road right-of-way. As noted previously, the request for RSF-1 zoning is consistent with the sizing of several A - Agricultural zoned properties in near proximity to the subject property whereas a number of those properties are less than 5 acres. Due to these justifications and meeting of criteria, the proposed rezone request from A (Agricultural) to RSF-1 (Residential) is consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. 2. The existing land use pattern. Response: As noted previously, the request for RSF-1 zoning is consistent with the sizing of several A - Agricultural zoned properties in near proximity to the subject Morgan Road (275) Rezone: Attachment “B” Narrative & Evaluation Criteria July 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com 2 property whereas a number of those properties are less than 5 acres. The subject property is bound on its northern, southern and western boundaries by Rural Agricultural District (A) zoned parcels, consisting of constructed single family homes. The subject property abuts Morgan Road on its eastern boundary, with additional Rural Agricultural District (A) zoned parcels across the Morgan Road right-of-way. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Response: The proposed RSF-1 zoning will provide a base zoning district more consistent with how the immediate neighborhood has been developed. As noted previously, the request for RSF-1 zoning is consistent with the sizing of several A - Agricultural zoned properties in near proximity to the subject property whereas a number of those properties are less than 5 acres. Although the proposed zoning is more intensive than the abutting zoning, again it is more consistent with existing residential development. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property for the proposed change. Response: The existing district boundaries are not illogically drawn. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment (rezone) necessary. Response: As discussed earlier, the requested rezone will provide a base zoning district more consistent with how the immediate neighborhood has been developed. This limited rezoning will further the options for development of limited single-family density for existing and future residents. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Response: The opposite would be the case. The proposed change would provide a base zoning district more consistent with how the immediate neighborhood has been developed. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. Response: The proposed development of an additional single-family home will not detrimentally affect the existing traffic flow of the existing neighborhood. The future development of another home on the subject property will be entirely compatible with surrounding land uses which contain similar/identical land Morgan Road (275) Rezone: Attachment “B” Narrative & Evaluation Criteria July 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com 3 uses themselves. No public safety concerns are anticipated resulting from the rezoning of this land. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. Response: Development of the subject property will comply with the water management standards of Collier County as necessary. Future development will be required to obtain drainage plans approval in order to develop the property. Preliminary analysis indicates that proposed development will function properly based on the applicable standards governing the property. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Response: The proposed limited RSF-1 zoning associated with future development of the subject property are located in an established residential neighborhood and as such, light and air are not anticipated to be reduced to the adjacent properties from the development of the southern portion of this property. 10. Whether the proposed change will seriously affect property values in the adjacent area. Response: As referenced in item #6 above, the proposed change will permit the development of a single-family home that will be fully compliant with the County development standards that will be consistent with the future development of an already permitted land use. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Response: The proposed limited rezone with the zoning requested will have no adverse affect on the development of adjacent properties under existing regulations. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. Response: No. The proposed change is consistent with the GMP and through the building permit process, all development will be consistent with the current LDC standards. Through both this zoning and the future building permit process, a benefit to the public welfare will accrue. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. Response: As noted previously, the request for RSF-1 zoning is consistent with the sizing of several A - Agricultural zoned properties in near proximity to the subject property whereas a number of those properties are less than 5 acres. Being Morgan Road (275) Rezone: Attachment “B” Narrative & Evaluation Criteria July 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com 4 consistent with the existing development type and land sizing, the existing zoning does not allow the furthering of that development pattern. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. Response: The proposed land use would continue to provide a residential land use consistent with the existing neighborhood fabric, where limited options exist today. This is viewed by the applicant as a benefit to the residents of the County financially, as another property taxed property consistent with the subdivision of property and the continuation of the neighborhood’s character. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Response: The limited rezone being requested is limited to the least intrusive and intensive use available that is consistent with the existing development pattern. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Response: Because a majority of the site is undeveloped, the applicant is seeking to subdivide the property equally with the approval of this rezone application. Utilities such as water, sewer, electric, phone, etc. are currently available and servicing the existing and the future subdivided property. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County growth management plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. Response: Again, because a majority of the site is undeveloped, the applicant is seeking to subdivide the property equally with the approval of this rezone application. Utilities such as water, sewer, electric, phone, etc. are currently available and servicing the existing and the future subdivided property. Upon review of the building permit and subdivision applications, the site shall comply with the level of service standards and capacities at the time of final approval. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Response: As previously stated, the proposed land use would continue to provide a residential land use consistent with the existing neighborhood fabric, where Morgan Road (275) Rezone: Attachment “B” Narrative & Evaluation Criteria July 2016 www.davidsonengineering.com 5 limited options exist today. This is viewed by the applicant as a benefit to the residents of the County financially, as another property taxed property consistent with the subdivision of property and the continuation of the neighborhood’s character. FLUE Policy 5.4 New developments shall be compatible with, and complimentary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). Response: The proposed land use would continue to provide a residential land use consistent with the existing neighborhood fabric, where limited options exist today. Objective 7 Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Response: The proposed rezone will continue to access Morgan Road, which provides access to Sabal Palm Drive to the south and thereby Collier Boulevard to the west. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. Response: N/A. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. Response: N/A. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. Response: N/A. 275 MORGAN ROADCollier County, Florida AS SH O W NN/A FL U CC S M A P PI N G SH EE T N O. DA TE PR OJE CT N O. SC ALE E A R T H T E C H E N V I R O N M E N T A L , L L CEARTH T E C H E N V I R O N M E N T A L , L L C1455 R A I L H E A D B L V D , S U I T E 81455 R A I L H E A D B L V D , S U I T E 8NAPLES, F L O R I D A 3 4 1 1 0NAPLES, F L O R I D A 3 4 1 1 0PHONE (2 3 9 ) 3 0 4 -0 0 3 0 F A X (2 3 9 ) 3 2 4 -0 0 5 4PHONE (2 3 9 ) 3 0 4 -0 0 3 0 F A X (2 3 9 ) 3 2 4 -0 0 5 4 110 740 630 428 814 200 0 200100 Fe et SUBJECT PROP ERT YFLUCCS M APPING 110 , RESI DE NTIAL 428 , CABB AGE PALM 630 , MIXED WETL AND HARDWOODS740, DIS TURBED L ANDS 814 , ROAD ROW 7/1 3/1 6G:\ETEnv Documents\PROJECTS\COLLIER\Morgan Road Parcel\GIS\FLUCCS MAPPING.mxd / 3:30:53 PMO Note:2016 Aerial & Projec t Bo undary obta inedfrom Collier County Property Ap praiser. 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 ▪ Naples, FL 34104 ▪ P (239) 434.6060 ▪ F (239) 434.6084 www.davidsonengineering.com TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 275 Morgan Road, Naples Collier County, Florida PREPARED FOR: Ms. Nancy Naftal 275 Morgan Road Naples, Florida 34114 PREPARED BY: Davidson Engineering, Inc. 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 Naples, Florida 34104 July 19, 2016 Table of Contents General ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Trip Generation ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Trip Analysis and Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2 General The purpose of this statement is to evaluate the net new trips caused by the proposed rezone to determine if any adverse effects will be caused on the surrounding roadways that warrant off‐site improvements The existing agriculturally zoned property consists of one single‐family residence located on 5.75 acres at 275 Morgan Road, Naples, Florida. The site is currently developed with one single‐family residence, a wood structure, a metal building, and existing pond. The project proposes to rezone the property into two single‐family lots, each with a single‐family residence. The site will maintain access from Morgan Road (unmonitored private local roadway) on the east side of the property and 10th Street North (unmonitored private local roadway) on the west. This project is expected to reach full build out by 2017. Figure 1: Project Location Site 3 Trip Generation Based on the existing and proposed conditions, the trip generation rates are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers publication, Trip Generation Ninth Edition. The Land Use Category and associated criterion used to analyze the net new trips are as follows: ITE Land Use Category Existing‐ LUC 210 Single‐Family Detached Housing Proposed‐ LUC 210 Single‐Family Detached Housing Analysis Criterion (Units) Existing‐ Dwelling Unit (X = 1) Proposed‐ Dwelling Units (X = 2) Tables 1, 2, and 3 offer the calculated trips for the existing, proposed, and net new conditions, respectively. The calculated net new trips will be compared to the existing trips on the nearest monitored roadway in order to determine if off‐site improvements are necessary. Table 1. Existing Trip Generation Equation Calculated Traffic Entering Exiting Weekday Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.72 15 8 (50%) 8 (50%) AM Peak T = 0.70 (X) + 9.74 10 3 (25%) 7 (75%) PM Peak Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51 2 1 (63%) 1 (37%) 4 Table 2. Proposed Trip Generation Equation Calculated Traffic Entering Exiting Weekday Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.72 29 15 (50%) 15 (50%) AM Peak Hour T = 0.70 (X) + 9.74 11 3 (25%) 8 (75%) PM Peak Hour Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.51 3 2 (63%) 1 (37%) Table 3. Net New Trips Traffic Entering Exiting Weekday 14 7 7 AM Peak Hour 1 0 1 PM Peak Hour 1 1 0 Trip Analysis and Conclusion The nearest monitored roadway, per the 2015 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report, is Link 35.0‐ Collier Boulevard (CR951) between Rattlesnake Hammock Road (CR864) and Tamiami Trail (US41). This segment of Collier Boulevard is a 6‐lane divided arterial roadway with a peak hour, peak direction service volume of 3,200 trips. This segment successfully functions at a level‐of‐service “C”. The addition of the proposed peak hour, peak direction trips is negligible when compared to the existing monitored volume of 1,620 trips. Therefore, the proposed rezone of the property will not create any adverse effects to the surrounding roadways nor warrant any off‐site improvements. 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 ▪ Naples, FL 34104 ▪ P (239) 434.6060 ▪ F (239) 434.6084 www.davidsonengineering.com DEAR PROPERTY OWNER: September 12, 2016 PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT FORMAL APPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO COLLIER COUNTY, PROPOSING TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY (RSF-1) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MORGAN ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 750 FEET NORTH OF SABAL PALM ROAD IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 5.75± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [RZ- PL20160001132] THE MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 5:30 P.M. ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2016 AT THE COLLIER COUNTY SOUTH REGIONAL LIBRARY- MEETING ROOM “B”, LOCATED AT 8065 LELY CULTURAL PKWY, NAPLES, FL 34113. PLEASE CONTACT ME AT (239) 434-6060 EXT. 2961, OR VIA E-MAIL AT FRED@DAVIDSONENGINEERING.COM, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE MEETING OR THE PROPOSED PROJECT. SINCERELY YOURS, FREDERICK E. HOOD, AICP SENIOR PLANNER EVERGLADES CITY DEVP LLC C/O LAMAR JERNIGAN NORIEGA 1001 HARDEE RD CORAL GABLES, FL 33146---3329 PLANCHER, LEROME MICHELINE DEVARISTE 268 ROSE APPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 DOXSEE, TAMMY K 267 ROSE APPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---2555 KNUTOWSKI, ROBERT A 260 ROSE APPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---2555 WHITE TR, DAVID E & JUDITH A D E & J A WHITE REV LIV TRUST UTD 5/10/04 303 MORGAN RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2563 ADVANCED SABAL PALM CORP 3331 WHITE BLVD NAPLES, FL 34117---4117 AKERS, TERRANCE D & PATRICIA R 280 SABAL PALM RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2569 WHITE TR, DAVID E & JUDITH A D E & A J WHITE REV LIV TRUST UTD 5/10/04 303 MORGAN RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2563 KATHARINE M TORP LIV TRUST 7988 TIGER LILY DR NAPLES, FL 34113---2633 TITUS, NANCY 300 SABAL PALM RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2548 NAFTAL JR, THEODORE & NANCY 275 MORGAN RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2563 KNUTOWSKI, ROBART A 260 ROSE APPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---2555 CARLSON, PAUL E 272 SABAL PALM RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2568 VOMEL, OLIVER 1 BEAGLE LAKE RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2545 CRAUMER, CLAUDETTE 775 CROSSFIELD CIR NAPLES, FL 34104---4758 WILLIAMS, FRED B & VIRGINIA L 298 MORGAN RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2534 MURPHY, WILLIAM H MICHAEL MURPHY 264 ROSE APPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---2556 WILLIAMS, BRIAN F & GINNY 302 MORGAN RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2562 LOUPE, MARK 276 SABAL PALM RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2568 SHIPLEY, DAVID R & JANET L 609 S PARK DR HUNTINGBURG, IN 47542---0000 FISHER, JAMIE J & DANA R 15 BEAGLE LAKE RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2545 INNES, JUDITH A 266 ROSE APPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---2556 ANDERSON, BOONRUEN 141 ROSE APPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---2555 WALTON, RUSSELL 269 ROSE APPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---2555 TAYLOR, MICHAEL A & LYNN 6735 STONEGATE DR NAPLES, FL 34109---7204 KENNY, JUSTINA 66 ROSE APPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 ISAROSKUL, SUNANTA 195 ROSE APPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---2555 PIPITONE, CHARLES ANTHONY 272 ROSE APPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 INNES, JUDITH A 262 ROSE APPLE LN NAPLES, FL 34114---2556 JARIKOV, VIKTOR IRYNA LABACHOVA 316 MORGAN RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2562 MARTINEZ, PEDRO & ESTHER 278 SABAL PALM RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2568 CARLSON, PAUL E & JUNE C 272 SABAL PALM RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2568 SARLO III, LOUIS & CHERYL 2 BEAGLE LAKE RD NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 KIDDER, TERESA L SUZANNE SALYER 284 SABAL PALM RD NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 CRIM, JAMES H & PATRICIA H 71 RIVER BIRCH CT ST MATTHEWS, SC 29135---8841 CUIFFO, STEVEN R 308 MORGAN RD NAPLES, FL 34114---2562 WATERMEN AT ROCK EDGE NAPLES 265 SEVILLA AVE CORAL GABLES, FL 33134---0000 WHITE, DAVID E & JUDITH A 303 MORGAN RD NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 ANDERSON, KENNETH C & LINDA J ASHLEE K ANDERSON RIVERA 292 MORGAN RD NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 NAFTAL, DWAIN & SIMONE 269 MORGAN RD NAPLES, FL 34114---0000 CUIFFO, STEVEN R PO BOX 630219 MIAMI, FL 33163---0219 JOHN P ARNOLD III MELISSA BERRY 3451 COUNTY BARN RD APT 201 # NAPLES, FL 34112---7435 CUIFFO, STEVEN PO BOX 630219 MIAMI, FL 33163---0219 CUIFFO, STEVEN R PO BOX 630219 MIAMI, FL 33163---0219 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912---0000 TAYLOR MORRISON OF FL INC 551 N CATTLEMEN RD # 200 SARASOT, FL 34232---0000 VERONAWALK HOMEOWNERS ASSO INC % SOUTHWEST PROPERTY MGMT CASTELLO PROFESSIONAL CTR 1044 CASTELLO DR STE 206 NAPLES, FL 34103---1900 14A Monday,September 12, 2016 Naples Daily News + ND-1215683 643-2559 933 Airport Rd. S, Naples, FL 34104 3.5 blks. N. of Davis, 1 blk S. of Naples Airport Open Sun 1-5pm • Mon.-Sat. 10am-6pm all widths AAAA - EEEE custom ﬁ tting by trained factory sales sta . World’s largest selection of comfort fashion sandals & shoes... NAOT, Mephisto, Taryn Rose, Helle Comfort, Wolky, Cole Haan, Thierry Rabotin, Beautifeel, Sperry, Ecco, Birkenstock, Florsheim, Finn Comfort, New Balance, SAS, Saucony, Asics, Sebago, Hushpuppy, Teva, Merrell, Fit Flop, Orthaheel, Acorn Slippers and many more... Family Owned and Operated for 65 Years Naples Oldest Shoe Store Must present Coupon at time of purchase. Not valid with any other offer. Expires 9/17/16 25$ OFF COUPON Expires 9/30/16 24/7 EMERGENCY SERVICE &$//72'$< BEST HOME SERVICES NAPLES FT. MYERS BONITA SPRINGS CAPE CORAL ESTERO MARCO ISLAND S A L EA/C I N V E N T O R Y S ACLEARANCE Sale Ends September 30,2016 BESTHOME SERVICES AIR CONDITIONING |ELECTRICAL |PLUMBING |DRAINSAIR CO www.GetBest.comwww.GetBest.com Don’tletaninecientA/Cdrainyourwallet! GetaA/Csystemyoucancountonevery daytogiveyouecientcooling.Settling forlessthanthebestcouldcostyoumore inthelongrun. Ifyouwantthe BEST inthebusiness choose BESTHomeServices, aCarrierFactoryAuthorizedDealer. Done.Right.Guaranteed. FREESERVICECALL $47COOLTUNE-UP ($119VALUE) *Coupons must be presented and discountedapplied the point of sales transaction. All salesare final and no other offers can be combined.Service call is free if customer proceeds with work.Rebates, financing and credits may vary by model. *Coupons must be presented and discounted ap-pliedthepointofsalestransaction.Allsalesarefinaland no other offers can be combined. New custom-ers only please. No breakdown this season. Mustbe able to start unit. Normal business hours only. YOURCHOICE FREE UltravioletLightSystemFREEHighEciencyAirCleanerFREEUpgradefrom14Seerto16Seer 24MonthsSameasCashFinancing* One Million Dollar InventoryIS ALMOST GONE! PLUS$1500inrebates UPTO *Coupons must be presented and discounted a the point of sales transaction. All sales are final and no otheroffers can becombined. Rebates,credits&financing vary bymodel. Financing withapproved credit. Interestaccrues at time of purchase unless paid in full during promotional period. For regular term purchases., APRis based on US prime rate and is subject to change. Monthly payments required. tem Yo u d e s e r v e o u r B E S T ! S A PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE September 12, 2016 No. 1259783 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a Neighborhood Information Meeting held by the Applicants/Property Owners, Theodore and Nancy Naftal, represented by Frederick E. Hood, AICP, of Davidson Engineering, INC. Thursday, September 29th, 2016 at 5:30pm Collier County South Regional Library - Meeting Room “B” 8065 Lely Cultural Pkwy Naples, FL 34113 Please be advised that formal applications have been submitted to Collier County, proposing to amend ordinance no. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning altas map of maps by changing the zoning classiﬁ cation of the herein described real property from the Rural Agricultural zoning district to the Residential Single Family (RSF-1) for the property located on the west side of Morgan Road, approximately 750 feet North of Sabal Palm Road in section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 5.75± acres; and by providing an effective date. (RZ-PL20160001132) WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the Owner/Developer, Davidson Engineering, Inc. and Collier County Staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone or e-mail by Thursday, September 29th, 2016 to the individuals listed below: Frederick E. Hood, AICP Davidson Engineering, Inc. 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.434.6060 Email: fred@davidsonengineering.com NAIROBI, Kenya - Three women have been killed after they attacked a po- lice station in the Kenyan coastal city of Mombasa on Sunday, a police official said. One of the women threw a firebomb at officers, while another pulled out a knife, Mombasa police chief Parterson Maelo said, adding that two policemen were wounded in the attack. The women, who were dressed in ni- qabs, were then shot by police. No group has claimed responsibility for the attack. But Kenya faces a con- stant danger of being attacked by adher- ents of the Somali militant group al-Sha- bab, which has vowed retribution for Ke- nya’s deployment of troops to Somalia in 2011. Maelo said the women arrived at the central police station about 10:30 a.m. to report a stolen telephone. “While the officers were questioning them about the particulars of the stolen phone, one of them drew a knife, and an- other threw a petrol bomb at the officers of the report office,” he said. Al-Shabab is al-Qaida’s affiliate in the region. It has recruited hundreds of Ke- nyans and used them in numerous at- tacks on the country, including the April 2015 attack at Garissa University, which killed more than 148 people. Recently, al-Shabab attacks in Kenya have been limited to the border towns of Mandera and Liboi near Somalia. However, Kenya is also struggling to battle the Islamic State group’s recruit- ment of some of the country’s youths. At least 20 young Kenyans have traveled to Libya to join the extremist group, ac- cording to police. Authorities have also been warning of a plot by extremist medics to unleash an anthrax attack. Four medics are in police custody, accused of being Islamic State members and plotting such an attack. AFP/GETTY IMAGES Police patrol outside a police station in Mombasa, Kenya, on Sunday after a knife and firebomb attack by three women. The three attackers were killed. Three women who attacked Kenyan police station killed TOM ODULA ASSOCIATED PRESS www.davidsonengineering.com Page 1 of 2 4365 Radio Road, Suite 201 ∙ Naples, FL 34104 ∙ P: (239) 434.6060 F: (239) 434.6084 M E M O R A N D U M October 17, 2016 TO: Eric Johnson – Collier County Growth Management FROM: Jessica Harrelson, Senior Project Coordinator REVIEWED BY: Frederick Hood, AICP, Senior Planner RE: MORGAN ROAD (275) REZONE RZ - PL20160001132 A Neighborhood Information Meeting was held on Thursday, September 29th at the Collier County South Regional Library, located at 8065 Lely Cultural Pkwy. The following individuals associated with the review and presentation of the project were present: • Frederick Hood, Davidson Engineering, Inc. • Jessica Harrelson, Davidson Engineering, Inc. • Megan Polk, Davidson Engineering, Inc. • Eric Johnson, Collier County Fred Hood started the meeting by making a presentation, reading the following: Introduction: o Good evening. My name is Fred Hood with Davidson Engineering. I am the land development consultant representing the applicant/property owners, Nancy and Theodore Naftal, for a Rezone Petition with Collier County. o Per the land development code, tonight’s meeting will be recorded. At the end of my presentation I will be happy to answer any questions you may have about the rezone. o Here with me tonight is Megan Polk and Jessica Harrelson (Land Planner and Project Coordinator) with Davidson Engineering, as well as Erich Johnson with the Collier County Growth Management Department. Eric is the County Planner reviewing the petition. Page 2 of 2 Size and Location: o The subject property is approximately 5.75 acres is located at 275 Morgan Road, which is approximately 750 feet north of Sabal Palm Road, with Morgan Road lying on the east side of the subject property. o All surrounding properties are developed, single family residential with Agricultural zoning. Purpose of the Rezone: o The purpose of this rezone application is to convert the ±5.75-acre parcel from the Rural Agricultural District (A) zoning district to Residential Single Family (RSF-1). o The approval of the rezone will allow for further permitting with Collier County, by submittal of a Final Plat application. o That subsequent application will seek to divide the property into two separate parcels (±2.875 acres a piece). This will enable for the construction of an additional single family home on the southern portion of the existing parcel, which will meet all development standards of the resultant zoning designation. o There are currently existing non-conforming structures at the northwest section of the property. These structures shall remain in their existing condition as legal non-conforming structures. o Furthermore, the future development of an additional home on the subject property will be entirely compatible with surrounding land uses which contain similar/identical land uses. There were no questions asked. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 5:35p.m. End of memo. Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Affi davit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier Coun- ty, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affi ant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post offi ce in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of one year next pre- ceding the fi rst publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affi ant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. ___________________________________________________________ Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.#_____________________________________________________________________________________ DAVIDSON ENGINEERING, INC 1259783 NIM Pub Dates September 12, 2016 _______________________________________ ;^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞŽĨĂĸĂŶƚͿ Sworn to and subscribed before me This September 15, 2016 _______________________________________ ;^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞŽĨĂĸĂŶƚͿ 2016-10-26