Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 12/13/2016 Item #17A
17.A 12/13/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve County-initiated amendments to the Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, to amend the Area of Critical State Concern overlay within the Future Land Use Element to provide for an agreement pursuant to Section 380.032(3) Florida Statutes; and to update and clarify text and correct map errors and omissions specifically amending the Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map; Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element to remove the discharge rates; Transportation Element and Transportation Map Series; and the Capital Improvement Element, for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for Review and Comments Response. (Transmittal Hearing) (PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11) OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to approve several individual staff- initiated amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity(DEO). CONSIDERATIONS: . Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government's adopted Growth Management Plan(GMP). . The Collier County Planning Commission(CCPC), sitting as the"local planning agency"under Chapter 163.3174, F.S., and the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC),held their Transmittal hearings for petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 on July 7, 2016, and October 20,2016. . This is the Transmittal hearing for these out of cycle, staff-proposed amendments to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Future Land Use Element(FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Map Series, Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map, Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facility Element,Transportation Element and Transportation Map Series, and the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. The amendments that are the subject of this hearing are limited in scope primarily to those directed by the Board following the adoption of 2011 Evaluation & Appraisal Review (EAR)-based GMP amendments and previous batch GMP amendments. Though not necessarily recommended by specific reference in the EAR, these mostly general updating and "housecleaning" amendments seek to add clarity, correct text and map errors or omissions, provide harmony and internal consistency among components of the Plan, and so forth. A specific set of changes to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Overlays and Special Features Section follow from Board direction to amend Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) Overlay provisions. Another small number of these staff-initiated changes are associated with recent amendments proposed for or adopted in the Land Development Code (LDC), changes in the 2014 or 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR), or with changes in State or Federal regulations, and to revise format, structure and language to follow other Board directives. Further explanation and staff analysis is provided in the CCPC Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts to Collier County result from this amendment, as this approval is for the Transmittal of this proposed amendment. However, the costs associated with legal advertising/public notice for the public hearings are borne by the County. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of these proposed amendments by the Board for Transmittal and their submission to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity will commence the Department's sixty (60) day state coordinated review process and ultimately return these amendments to the CCPC and the Board for final Adoption hearings to be held in 2017. Packet Pg. 2563 17.A 12/13/2016 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality. A majority vote of the Board is needed for adoption of the Resolution and transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity(DEO). (HFAC] COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL: That the EAC forward proposed revisions to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) and the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) found in Petition CPSP-2013- 11 to the CCPC with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the Planning Commission, sitting as the EAC, forward proposed revisions to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) and the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) found in Petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 to the Board with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the Planning Commission forward Petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 to the Board with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, subject to a change to the ACSC Overlay in the FLUE made at their October 20th meeting - to withdraw that portion of the amendment noted in the Staff Report Addendum that proposed to provide for a variance to be applicable to certain essential services uses and instead replace that with an allowance for agreements pursuant to Chapter 380.032(3),F.S. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition at their July 7, 2016 and October 20, 2016 meetings. There were no public speakers to this item on July 7. One person spoke to this item on October 20, with remarks focused predominantly on ACSC provisions - and expressed support for staff's replacement language regarding agreements per Florida Statute. The CCPC forwarded petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 to the Board with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, as presented by staff (vote: 5/0), subject to revisions to the Future Land Use, Capital Improvement, Conservation and Coastal Management, and Transportation Elements; these revisions are mostly reflected in the Addendum for the October 20 CCPC meeting and all CCPC-recommended revisions are reflected in Resolution Exhibit"A". STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: Same as the CCPC's recommendation - to transmit petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity subject to all revisions recommended by the CCPC. Prepared by: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, and David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager,Comprehensive Planning Section,Zoning Division,Growth Management Department ATTACHMENT(S) 1. September_l Batch2_Stf.Rpt Addendum (PDF) 2.July_7_Batch2_Stf.Rpt_w_Attach (PDF) 3. [Linked] Batch_#2_Resolution-102416(1) (PDF) 4.BCC_Batch#2_Ad 12.13.2016 (PDF) 5.Legal ad-Agenda ID 1734 (PDF) Packet Pg. 2564 17.A 12/13/2016 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.A Item Summary: Recommendation to approve County-initiated amendments to the Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, to amend the Area of Critical State Concern overlay within the Future Land Use Element to provide for an agreement pursuant to Section 380.032(3) Florida Statutes; and to update and clarify text and correct map errors and omissions specifically amending the Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map; Stormwater Management Sub- Element of the Public Facilities Element to remove the discharge rates; Transportation Element and Transportation Map Series; and the Capital Improvement Element, for Transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for Review and Comments Response. (Transmittal Hearing) (PL- 20130002637/CPSP-2013-11) Meeting Date: 12/13/2016 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Senior—Zoning Name: Marcia Kendall 11/08/2016 7:48 AM Submitted by: Title: Division Director-Planning and Zoning—Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 11/08/2016 7:48 AM Approved By: Review: Zoning Michael Bosi Level 1 Add Division Reviewer Completed 11/08/2016 8:58 AM Growth Management Department David Weeks Level 1 Add Division Reviewer Completed 11/08/2016 9:21 AM Growth Management Department Jeanne Marcella Level 1 Division Reviewer Completed 11/09/2016 2:59 PM Growth Management Department Jeanne Marcella Level 2 Division Administrator Completed 11/16/2016 1:58 PM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 11/16/2016 4:06 PM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 11/16/2016 4:44 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A.Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 11/17/2016 8:39 AM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 11/17/2016 8:56 AM County Manager's Office Leo E.Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 11/28/2016 12:17 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 12/13/2016 9:00 AM Packet Pg.2565 17.A.1 Agenda Item 9.A riff _-_, ADDENDUM to STAFF REPORT Ti COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION E TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION U) FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE ~v, PLANNING SECTION m HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 13 RE: PETITION NO. PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11, STAFF-PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO E THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE a ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, GOLDEN GATE AREA E MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT N OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AND *t TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES,AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE E GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] m 0 Modifications have been made, per CCPC discussion and consensus at the July 7 CCPC hearing, to ti portions of the Transmittal Resolution Exhibit "A." These changes are denoted and briefly explained below. No changes were discussed to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map or F'� Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element, and these portions of the is Transmittal Resolution Exhibit "A" are unchanged from their July 7 versions. Also, one new provision -I is added to the FLUE, an allowance for variance to the Area of Critical State Concern regulations for Q certain essential services. The added text and explanation/justification is provided within the FLUE a portion of this report (pages 3-5). re 1 Formatting explanation: m1 Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted — as presented to CCPC on 7/7/16. o Words double underlined are added; words doublc struck through are deleted — per 7/7/16 meeting. m T i CCME: L 2 Policies 7.1.2(2), 7.1.2(2)(a), and 7.1.2(2)(c): Include a public awareness program for new preserves E as part of habitat management plans for listed species and other protected species,to educate residents a about preserves within their developments and the need to maintain the habitat within preserves, as in i follows (for multiple species, not just scrub jay): j Policy 7.1.2: E (2) Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species and for those protected species identified c below shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where Q the wildlife survey indicated indicates listed species or the protected species identified below are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Management glans for new .reserves shall also outline a 'public awareness •rogram to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain habitat within the •reserve for listed species and those protected species identified below. — 1 — Packet Pg. 2566 17.A.1 Agenda Item 9.A (a) Management plans for new preserves shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species, and those protected species identified below, and their habitat from the negative impacts of proposed development. Developments shall be clustered to discourage impacts to listed species habitats. Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage To wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses, and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors. text break F- (c) Habitat preservation plans for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) are required and shall conform to the guidelines contained in Technical Report No. 8,Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. The required management plan shall c alse provide for a maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical CO protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. - : =. - - = :• : •- awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain the sem. -a= :- These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS CD South Florida Multi Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph(3) of this policy. Coincides with similar changes in the FLUE. 0° ti Policy 10.5.1: Clarify the type of recreation which is compatible with the natural functions of beaches and dunes on undeveloped shorelines; providing context within the Policies supporting Objective 10.5, E as follows: -_ Policy 10.5.1: Passive I recreation that is compatible with the natural functions of beaches and dunes is- shall be regarded as the highest and best land use. Policy 10.5.4: Provide clarity regarding the scope of prohibited structures, as follows (change "shall" to "may"): Policy 10.5.4: m, The County shall may prohibit construction of any structure seaward of the Coastal Construction Li Setback Line. Exceptions shall be allowed for passive recreational structures, access crossovers, ai and where enforcement would not allow any reasonable economic utilization of such property. In the latter event,require construction that shall minimizes interference with natural functions of such beaches and dunes. c Policy 12.1: Remove redundancy and correctly identify the agency name, as follows: OBJECTIVE 12.1: cc Maintain hurricane evacuation clearance times as required by state law. An evacuation clearance time shal-l-be is defined as having residents and visitors in an appropriate refuge away from storm surge prior to the arrival of sustained Tropical Storm force winds, i.e.,winds equal to or greater than 39 mph. To further this eObjective, for future mobile home developments located outside of the storm surge zone, such development shal4 is to include on-site sheltering or retro-fitting of an adjacent facility. The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall continues to seek —2— Packet Pg. 2567 17.A.1 Agenda Item 9.A opportunities to increase shelter facilities and associated capacities under the direction of the Dcpartmc- the Florida Division of Emergency Management. CIE: Policy 5.3 D., now 5.5 D.: Update/correct map references, as follows: Policy 5.4 5: D. The necessary facilities and services are under construction or under contract pursuant to a FDOT 5-Year Work Program and are consistent with the Collier County 2025 2040 Long N Range Needs Plan or the 240 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), as adopted by the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization(MPO); or N FLUE: Objective 4 and Policy 4.1: Correct mid-sentence capitalization and clearly indicate requirements for E planning "studies", as follows: a. OBJECTIVE 4: a Continually refine the Future Land Use Element through detailed planning in Ift order to improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development,4housing and urban design, -- - . . - _. . _ - ----- . . . .. - - . through detailed planning. Future studies might address specific geographic or issue areas. All future studies must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan and further its intent. ti Policy 4.1: Planning studies doh-thy"- • _ • _ _ _ • - _ _ may address specific geographic or issue areas. ACSC: To list of exotic plant species, delete an errant reference to multiple species ("spp.") where the »- specific species is listed. Also, though the specific species name listed may, or may not, remain ce accurate, no change is made so as to be identical to that listed in State law. Substantively, and new to this petition, the following changes are made - all added text is at end of the ACSC Overlay: 1)As allowed by Rule Chapter 28-25, F.A.C., Land Planning—Part Ill Boundary and Regulations for Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, add provision for the Land Development ca Code (LDC) variance process to be applicable to ACSC regulations, and provide that the LDC will be amended, as necessary, within one year to implement this allowance; 2) limit the applicability of the variance to select essential services; 3) advise the reader that this variance allowance does not alter i= the allowable essential services beyond that provided for under the future land use designation and Q zoning; and, 4) as required by Ch. 28-25, provide that the variance can only be approved where the development is designed to have minimum adverse impacts. Staff did not originally include this variance provision because it was thought that the amendment needed to include additional parameters for the variance and there was not adequate time to do so; staff intended to bring this variance provision forward as a separate GMP amendment at a later time. However, based upon recent discussion with the ACSC Review Team at the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO), staff is now of the opinion that the amendment proposed will be acceptable to DEO staff. The genesis for this added text are three circumstances that have arisen over the past three or so years for different properties lying within the ACSC. First, Everglades City needed to expand their water treatment plant located in Copeland that would have necessitated impacting wetlands. Ultimately, they —3 — Packet:Pg. 2568 17A.1 Agenda Item 9.A were able to revise their proposed site plan so as not to run afoul of ACSC limitations. Second, the Seminole Tribe of Florida desires to develop a small site with a community center/essential service use that may impact wetlands and will exceed the 10% site alteration limitation. Third, the Lee County Electric Co-op needs to expand development on an existing power substation site that will exceed the 10% site alteration limitation and impact protected wetlands. None of these three scenarios promote, or result in, more development occurring in the ACSC beyond that already allowed by present future land use designations and zoning. Staff is of the opinion that all three circumstances are examples of where some relief to the stringent requirements of the ACSC regulations appear to be appropriate. 76 The ACSC regulations were established over forty years ago. The stated purposes of the ACSC regulations, as expressed in Ch. 28-25, are: "to conserve and protect the natural, environmental and economic resources and the scenic beauty of the Big Cypress Area, including ... ecologically related wetlands, estuarine fisheries, and the fresh water aquifer, and ecologically related areas. It is the further purpose of these regulations to provide a land and water management system that will preserve water quality, provide for the optimum utilization of the limited water resources of the area, facilitate orderly E and well-planned development, and protect the health, welfare, safety and quality of life of the residents of the state." Therefore, it is appropriate that any variance allowance be limited in scope so as not to undermine the purposes of the ASCS regulations. d A. Area of Critical State Concern Overlay *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** *** c. Soils exposed during site alteration shall be stabilized and retention ponds or performance m equivalent structures or systems maintained in order to retain run off and siltation on the .. construction site. Restoration of vegetation to site alteration areas shall be substantially completed within 180 days following completion of a development. Re-vegetation shall be accomplished with pre-existing species or other suitable species except that undesirable E exotic species shall not be replanted or propagated. Exotic Undesirable exotic species are listed below. Australian Pine - (Casuarina spp.) 45. Bishopwood - (Bischofia javanica) Brazilian Pepper- (Shinus terebinthfolius) Melaleuca (cajeput) - (Melaleuca leucadendra app) m *** *** *** *** text break L All Development Orders issued for projects within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern shall be rendered to the State of Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for review with the potential for appeal to the Administration Commission per Chapter 73C-44, Florida Administrative Code, "Community Planning, Development Order Requirements for Areas of Critical State cr) Concern". E In accordance with Chapter 28-25.011,F.A.C.,the zoning variance procedure contained in the Collier County Land Develo ment Code Ord. No. 04-41 as amended shall be a..licable to the ACSC (13 Regulations. Within one ear of the effective date of this amendment establishing the a..licability of the variance .rocedure the variance .rocedure and criteria in the Collier County Land Develo sment Code shall be amended as necessa to address ACSC regulations. Any variance to the ACSC regulations shall be subject to the following restrictions: a A variance shall onl be a..licable to essential services consisting of those services and facilities necessa to .romote and .rotect .ublic health. safet and welfare limited to the following: —4— Packet Pg.2569 17.A.1 Agenda Item 9.A 'olice• fire• emer'encv medical• all services desi•ned and oserated to .rovide water sewer !as tele shone electrici cable television or communications to the 'eneral .ublic b .roviders that have been a..roved and authorized according to laws having a.pro.riate 'urisdiction. This shall not be deemed to allow such essential services uses where the underlying future land use designation or zoning designation does not allow such uses. (b) No variance shall be granted for any development within the Critical Area unless such develo.ment is desi' ed to have minimum adverse im.act on the Area's water storage ca.acit_ 6 surface water and estuarine fisheries. E RLSA Policies 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3: Withdraw proposed changes to RLSA Overlay FSA, HSA and WRA acreage figures—to be reconsidered at a later date. Also withdraw the initially-proposed corrections to I the "HAS" acronym to read "HSA" remain, as the acronym appears correctly in the adopting Ordinance c [2002-54]. RLSA Policies 5.5.2., 5.5.2.a., and 5.5.2.c.: Include a public awareness program for new preserves as part of habitat management plans for listed species and other protected species, to educate residents about preserves within their developments and the need to maintain the habitat within preserves, as n. follows: Policy 5.5: 2. Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species and for those protected species identified below shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where m the wildlife survey indicated indicates listed species or the protected species identified below are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their E habitats. Management plans for new preserves shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain habitat within the preserve for listed species and those protected species identified below. 2.a. Management plans for new preserves shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species, and those protected species identified below, and their habitats from the ti negative impacts of proposed development. Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other 00i obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to Li facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway a j crossings, underpasses and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors. c. d v) 2.c. Habitat preservation plans for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) are "5— required and shall conform to the guidelines contained in Technical Report No. 8,Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. The required management plan shall alse provide for a maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. The plan shall also outline a public awareness - _ -:-__: _6 maintain the scrub _b_ I-' . These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. Coincides with similar changes in the COME. —5 — Packet;Pg. 2570 17.A.1 Agenda Item 9.A r.1 Transportation Element: Objective 3 and Policy 3.5: Clarify the type of development agreements, studies, plans and programs; providing context within the Policies supporting Objective 3, as follows: OBJECTIVE 3: Provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights-of-way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program,Board approved development agreements~ > /er the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies,plans and programs. Policy 3.5: A. The County is considering the viability of a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP) ordinance and land development regulations that: 1. identify, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway network shown on the County's Long Range Transportation Plana a.nd ether Board approved development agreements,the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's(MPO's)adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, plans and programs; and a. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** N All of the above must be consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies. agreements, plans and programs, and Chapter 336.02, Florida Statutes. 00 ti Policy 5.5: Delete specific name of an agency so as to retain only a generic name reference, as follows: Policy 5.5: Commercial developments within the South US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification to the Transportation Planning Department County transportation planning agency (presently, the Transportation Planning Section of the Growth Management Department) that at least four (4) of the following Transportation Demand Management(TDM) strategies will be utilized: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** An applicant seeking an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation through the m certification mentioned above shall submit an application to the Transportation Division Administrator Manaacr of the County transportation planning agency e - -• , - Planning Scetion of the Growth Management Department) on forms provided by the Division agency. Binding commitments to utilize any of the above techniques relied upon to obtain Q certification shall be required as a condition of development approval. cn w Map TR-1: Remove 1-75 interchange at Everglades Blvd.; add a note at bottom of map; and, make general map corrections. Map TR-2: Remove 1-75 interchange at Everglades Blvd.; add a note at bottom of map; and, add to legend and map face an interchange study area. Ulaa CI'SI'-13-I1 Balch.2 Staff Bpi Add.fr Sepl 01 CCPC G:ACBES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning CMI'DATA\Camp Plan Amendments\CPSP-2013-11 Second Batch Amendments\aaa Uatch.2 Materials In Sept 01 CCPC /8-4-16 —6— Packet Pg.2571 (Ie}}Iwsue.il s}uawpuewV dW9 Z#1-133BEI t'EL .) 40e11V nn tdWPS Z4a1ea—L I(Inr quawgoelIV N' N tom, Q tri t• N' r � Agenda Item 9.A ac STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: JULY 7, 2016, CONTINUED FROM JUNE 16, 2016 RE: PETITION NO. PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11, STAFF-PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES,AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] REQUESTED ACTION and STAFF ANALYSIS: This proposal consists of several individual staff-initiated amendments, as authorized or directed by the Board of County Commissioners to six Elements of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Most of these are "housecleaning" or"glitch" amendments intended to add clarity, correct text and map errors or omissions, and provide harmony and internal consistency among components of the GMP. A number of these Board-directed changes are not substantive but are predominately corrective in nature and follow direction provided by the adopted 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). Another small number of these staff-initiated changes are associated with recent amendments proposed for or adopted in the Land Development Code (LDC), changes in the 2014 or 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR), or with changes in State or Federal regulations, and to revise format, structure and language to follow other Board directives, and to properly reflect staff functions. Additionally, staff is proposing a substantive amendment to the Stormwater Management Sub-Element to remove the stormwater off-site discharge rates and replace with a reference to the Land Development Code; and, an amendment to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element to remove references to the Stormwater Management Sub-Element and the Water Resource Ordinance (No. 2001-27) related to the off-site discharge rates and replace with references to the Land Development Code — as approved and directed by the BCC on April 26, 2016 (refer to the attached Executive Summary and White Paper on Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates). As provided by Ordinance 10-37,this Staff Report also serves to provide guidance to the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) in making a recommendation on the proposed amendments to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element(CCME)and the Future Land Use Element(FLUE)to carry forward through hearings by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County Commissioners (BCC). Each amendment is identified below, followed by a brief explanation/analysis. The proposed amendments themselves make up the individual Exhibit"A"s accompanying the Transmittal Resolution. — 1 — (le;;Iwsue�l s;uawpuawtl dlN9 Z#1131e9 : b£LI•) q3e14V m ld2i'flS Zgo;es—Z/(Ind :;uewgoe;;t/ M` Cg 141 Q` N• •' Agenda Item 9.A n. Conservation &Coastal Management Element (CCME): 0- • • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction —revise Goals, Objectives and Policies for proper language format of a GMP Objective and Policy, as follows: Objectives 1.1, 2.1, 4.2, 5.4, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 10.1, 10.5, 12.1, 12.2, 12.4; and Policies 1.1.1, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 3.1.4.1, 10.5.1, 10.5.2, 10.5.3, 10.5.4, 10.5.6, 10.5.7, 10.5.8, 10.5.9, 10.5.12, 11.1.1, 12.1.8. These were overlooked and did not specifically appear in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR- based GMP Amendments. • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Goals, Objectives and Policies for proper language format, capitalizing references to specific Elements, Goals, Objectives and Policies, as follows: Policies 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 2.1.1 through 2.1.7, 3.1.4, 6.1.1, 6.1.2.e, 6.1.2.(1), (3), (4), (5),(8)and(10),6.1.5,6.1.9, 6.2.4, 6.2.4.(2), 6.2.5, 6.2.5.(1), (1)a, (3),(4), (6)a.4, and (6)a.5, 6.2.6, 6.2.7, 6.2.7(2) and (3), 6.2.9, 6.5.2(1), (3), (4) and (6), 6.2.6, 6.2.7, 6.2.9, 6.5.2(1), 7.1.1(6), 7.1.2(2)(a)2 and 3, 7.1.2(2)(c), (d), (e) and (g), 7.2.2, 10.4.3, 10.6.1, 10.6.1(6), 12.1.4, 12.3.1. These were overlooked and did not specifically appear in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR- based GMP Amendments. • Revise Objective 2.1 to redirect references provided in subsection "a." from the Stormwater Management Sub-Element [where off-site discharge rates are presently listed] to the Land Development Code[where new off-site discharge rates are to be listed], per April 26, 2016 Board direction; also, revise Objective 2.1 to redirect references provided in subsection "d." from "Ordinance 2001-27, adopted May 22, 2001" [where basins are presently established and off- site discharge rate limits are set]to the County Land Development Code[where new information is to be listed], per April 26, 2016 Board direction; the subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Objective 2.1 subsection "a." to identify the specific citation in an updated version of a document previously provided by piaceholder language here. • Revise Policy 3.1.4 to provide full entries, internal consistency and clarity, to reflect changes to LDC provisions for development within Wellfield Risk Management Zones, and re-number accordingly. • Revise Policy 3.3.2 to correct Board name and map series; map reference cannot be to both the "Countywide FLUM" and the "FLUM Series"—the Wellfield Risk Management Zone map is part of the "series". • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Policy 6.5.2 to identify the specific citation in an updated version of a document previously provided by placeholder language here. • Revise Objective 7.1 and Policy 7.1.2 (as with revisions proposed in the FLUE) to delete no longer needed references to specific publications used by the FFWCC and USFWS for technical assistance, as found elsewhere in Policy 7.1.2, and, revise for proper language format throughout. Also revise to address USFWS and FFWCC changes in regulations governing protection and management of listed species. Proposed changes to the CCME retain requirements for management plans for development, for bald eagle and Florida black bear. Requirements for management plans in the Policy are consistent with the requirements and goals of the Bald Eagle Management Plan (http://myfwc.com/media/427567/Eaole Plan April 2008.pdf) and -2- (le;;lwsueal s;uewpuawy dINO Z# PIES P£LI.) 43eUV nn1d2I'llS Z4ote8 L—Alnr :;uawyoe;;y Q `r' N' Agenda Item 9.A m Florida Black Bear Management Plan (http://mvfwc.comImedia/2612905/bear-management- plan.pdf) adopted by the State. A major goal of the Florida Black Bear Management Plan is to a l reduce human-black bear conflicts by educating residents who live in areas where black bears occur, about black bears and to secure trash, a major attractant to black bears. For bald eagle, establishing nest protection zones around nests of bald eagle and limiting activities that can occur in the nest protection zones or when certain activities can occur within these zones,remain as criteria used by the State for development. These criteria along with delineation of the nest protection zones on site plans approved by the State are in turn included on site plans for development approved by the County. • Remove/revise Policies 10.1.6 and 10.3.15 to implement proposed changes to LDC provisions for development within the Special Treatment Zoning Overlay. • Revise Policy 12.1.4 to reflect updated agency name. • Revise Policy 12.1.14 to reflect updated edition of reference document. • Revise Policy 12.3.3 to reflect updated agency names and position titles. Capital Improvement Element (CIE): • Revise Policy 1.1 to introduce the parenthetical acronym before its first appearance/use in this Element unaccompanied by its parent term. • Revise to update Level of Service Standards (LOSS) in Policies 1.5.D and 1.5.E, as adjusted by the 2014 Water Master CIP Plan and the 2015 AUIR. The Water LOSS was adjusted from 170 gpcd to 150 gpcd in the 2014 AUIR approved by the .-. BCC on November 10, 2014, reflecting the updated historical analysis contained in the 2014 Water Master CIP Plan,also Appendix III to the 2015 AUIR approved by the Board on November 10, 2015. The North Service Area Wastewater Treatment LOSS was adjusted from 120 gpcd to 100 gpcd in the 2014 AUIR approved by the BCC on November 10, 2014, reflecting the updated historical analysis contained in the 2014 Water Master CIP Plan, also Appendix Ill to the 2015 AUIR approved by the Board on November 10, 2015. The South Service Area Level of Service Standard (LOSS) has remained unchanged since 2001 at 100 gpcd. The northeast service area has been incorporated into the north service area, and the southeast service area has been incorporated in the south service area. • Revise Policy 4.1 to reflect changes to Florida Statutes by HB 7207 [which is now Chapter 2011- 139, Laws of Florida], in particular the deletion of the restriction limiting amendments of the comprehensive plan to no more than twice a year, and to the descriptions of corrections and modifications on amendments to the CIE. • Revise Policy 4.2 to allow adoption of the Collier County School District capital improvement plan and facilities work program documents by reference, previously requiring each specific updated version of these documents to be adopted each year with the annual update to the Schedule of Capital Improvements. This revision also reflects changes to Florida Statutes by HB 7207 [which is now Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] • Revise Objective 5 to introduce a formal title in text before its standards are established and described later in this Element. • Revise Policies 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 for internal consistency, per adopted 2011 EAR direction to discontinue use of "zero"—based entries under Objectives; these were —3— (le;;Iwsueal s;uawpuawy dWJ Z#40128 : t'£Ll) qoe13`d M 1d21' S Z4o4e9 L /c1n0 :;uawipe;;y N `Q N Agenda Item 9.A a d overlooked and did not specifically appear in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMP as Amendments.This re-formatting shifts and re-numbers existing supporting Policies and changes cross references between Policies, under this Objective, and in Programs to Insure Implementation subsection V.6.C. • Revise Policy 5.3.D to reflect name-change of agency. • Revise the "footnotes" that provide brief explanations of revenue sources and their acronyms found in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in accordance with changes made in previous AUIRs. Future Land Use Element (FLUE): • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction —revise Objectives and Policies for proper language format of a GMP Objective and Policy, as follows: Objectives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7; and Policies 1.1 through 1.5, 2.1 through 2.6, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1 through 4.10, 5.1 through 5.14, and 6.1 through 6.5. This re-formatting creates new supporting Policies taken from the Objective in numerous locations,and shifts and re-numbers existing supporting Policies under these Objectives. These were overlooked and did not specifically appear in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMP Amendments. • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Policies for proper language format, capitalizing references to specific Policies, as follows: Policies 5.10, 7.5; Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA Overlay) Policies 3.11, 4.16, 4.18, 4.20, 4.21, 5.5.2.a.ii and, a. iii, 5.5.2.b through 2.f, 5.5.2.g, 5.6 and 5.6.3.a.i and 3.c and 3.f.iv; and RLSA Overlay Attachment "C". These were overlooked and did not specifically appear in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR- based GMP Amendments. • Revise to update Policy references in the introductory FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES list affected by changes to Objectives and Policies for proper language format throughout. • Eliminate ASI (Area of Significant Influence) option from Policy 2.2 as a corrective measure necessitated by recent statutory changes regarding areas of significant influence and to maintain consistency between documents. • Revise to update CIE Policy references in Policy 2.5; now 2.6, revised by the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMP Amendments. • Revise to update Policy reference in Policy 3.1.j; now 3.2.j, affected by changes to Objectives and Policies for proper language format throughout; also revised likewise in Policy 5.1.a, now 5.3.a; Policy 5.1.d, now 5.3.d; Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict subsection g.; Density Rating System subsection 1.e.1), and in Future Land Use Map Series listing. • Insert parenthetical numerical entries where only written numbers appear, or written numbers where only numerical entries appear, so as to add clarity [in these page 42 Subdistrict provisions]. More such housecleaning revisions occur later in document, for instructional and regulatory entries. • Insert parenthetical percentage entries where only written percentages appear, or written percentages where only numerical percentage entries appear, so as to add clarity [in Density -4- (Ie;pwsueij swawpuawy dWJ Z#434e8 b£Ll) 43e4V M Id2!'J Zoo;e8 1—llnr :;uawgoe;;y N ti Q � Agenda Item 9.A a d Rating System provision B.2.c.] More such housecleaning revisions occur later in document, co for instructional and regulatory entries. al • Revise to replace numerical entry with written number [in Density Rating System provision B.4.a.] • Revise Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands provision A) 4.b) to update name of State agency, and remove name of County agency who is not specifically involved with Wildfire Prevention and Mitigation Planning. • Revise Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Sending Lands provision C)6. to extend TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) Sending Lands Early Entry Bonus horizon to September 27, 2018 per (April 28, 2015) Board direction. • Revise Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands provision D) 3.a) to indicate certain LDC provisions have been amended as instructed by this provision. • Revise to update Policy reference in Estates Designation statements affected by changes to Objectives and Policies for proper language format throughout. • Revise Overlay and Special Features' provision V.A. to read same as State ACSC (Area of Critical State Concern)regarding prohibited impacts to wetlands, to amend the prohibited plants list to include all of those in the LDC, to reorganize/restructure the Overlay, correct an internal reference, and to reference the Ochopee area lying within [but exempted from] the Overlay. • Revise Overlays and Special Features, Receiving Areas provision V.B.3.to standardize the use of words in legal descriptions, replacing the less-frequent use of numerical fractions. More such housecleaning revisions occur later in document. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 1.6 to reflect statutory changes concerning the EAR based amendment process. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 1.22 to reflect name-change of State agency. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policies 3.1, 3.2 & 3.3 to reflect updated acreage figures for these land areas, based upon changes to these designations since first being identified. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 4.3 to indicate certain LDC provisions have been amended as instructed by this provision, remove the "one time" activity implied, and indicate an ongoing relationship between such amendments. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 4.4 to reflect statutory changes concerning the EAR based amendment process. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 4.18 to provide for an alternative/alternatives to application of the FIAM per Board direction. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 5.5 (as with revisions proposed in the CCME) to delete no longer needed references to specific publications used by the FFWCC and USFWS for technical assistance, and; revised for proper language format throughout. [Refer to the extended CCME Objective 7.1 and Policy 7.1.2 note above for additional explanation.] • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 5.6 to remove date specificity to reflect that the time period provided for has passed and action has occurred. • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise RLSA Overlay Policy 5.6 to identify the updated version of a specific document initially overlooked here. —5 — (len!wsueJ1 s;uawpuewv dWJ Z#434e9 : VEL q3etld m idb'.faS Zya;eB—L—Alnr :;uewyae;;v ! Q N Agenda Item 9.A as • Replace the informal "#" with the formal No.' or "no." for internal consistency in a Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay provisions and throughout. Note: the strike through of the number symbol-#- may not be apparent in Exhibit"A". • Revise RLSA Overlay Attachment "C" footnote to recognize the correct Policy. Note: the underlining visible in the body of the table does not connote any proposed amendment, as the only change is to a footnote. Future Land Use Map Series (FLUMS): • Revise the Countywide FLUM to provide for current mapping; identifying the geographic area of Ochopee that lies within the boundary of the ACSC [by delineation and notation] but is exempt from ACSC regulations,and update the horizon year from 2025 to 2030. Pertaining to the FLUM horizon year extension, data and analysis regarding land use inventories and future needs is attached, taken from the 2011 EAR, and population projections are provided as revised in 2015. This data and analysis indicates there is adequate land to support the projected population in the new FLUM horizon year of 2030. Note that the population projection prepared in 2015 for the new horizon year of 2030 (435,400) is less than the population projection for year 2025 contained in the 2011 EAR(446,400). • Revise the RLSA Stewardship Overlay Map to provide for current mapping; reflecting the addition of Stewardship Sending Area(SSA)No. 16 and the removal of SSA No.8; and, removal of areas designated Conservation from the RLSA. • Revise titles in the 4 Properties Consistent by Policy inset maps [EXFLU_Maps 9, 10, 11 & 12] to update Policy references affected by changes to Objectives and Policies for proper language format throughout. • Revise to update the 19 Activity Center inset maps (throughout)to provide for current mapping; adding an informational zoning note/disclaimer in each map's legend, updating the base maps' underlying zoning, developed parcel & building footprint information, updating the base maps' parcel split and subdivision information, and updating road changes (intersection improvements & realignments, ROW widenings & reconfigurations, etc., e.g. Davis Blvd./CR 951 and US 41/CR 951. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Area-wide Map (GGAMP): • Revise to update the GGAMP Area-wide FLUM to provide for current mapping; depicting the PRC&M PUD [Palm Royale Cemetery & Mausoleum] area on south side of Vanderbilt Beach Rd. between CR 951 & Logan Blvd. The southerly "outlot" that abuts Cherry Wood Drive is within Golden Gate Estates thus is within the GGAMP Estates land use designation. Stormwater Management Sub-Element: • Revise Objective 6 to remove superfluous text. • Revise Policy 6.2 to reflect updated edition of reference document. • Revise Policy 6.3 to remove listing of off-site discharge rates, and move them to the County Land Development Code, per April 26, 2016 Board direction. _6,_ N (lelllwsuewl sluawpuewy dV Z#431e9 : b£LL) 4oe13y M lda'i1S Zoo;e9 L Alnr :luaw43e4P1 co Q N Agenda Item 9.A Transportation Element(TE): • Revise entries under the introductory List of Tables/Maps/Figures and Future System Needs section to update text references to reflect transportation map updates, as revised by the MPO and Collier County. • Revise Future System Needs section to update text references to reflect transportation map updates, as revised by the MPO and Collier County. • Revise Intermodal& Multi-Modal Transportation section to reflect name-change of agency; also revised likewise in Perspectives section, the Introduction, Objective 3, Policy 3.5, Policy 6.1, Policy 11.3 and Policies 12.1 & 12.2. • Revise Perspectives section subsection heading to remove redundancy. • Revise Objective 3 and Policy 3.5 to properly reflect staff functions in their consideration of documents that identify transportation improvement projects. • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Goals, Objectives and Policies for proper language format of a GMP Objective and Policy, as follows: Policy 3.1. This was overlooked and did not specifically appear in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMP Amendments. • Revise Policy 5.5 to reflect name-change of department/director. Insert parenthetical numerical entries where only written numbers appear, or written numbers where only numerical entries appear. More such housecleaning revisions occur later in document. • Revise to update CIE Policy references in Policy 5.6 and Policy 5.7, revised by the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMP Amendments. • Revise throughout to correctly use the "US 41" highway designation that officially, has no periods, as with "U.S. 41"and no hyphenation, as with "US-41". Change all US 41 entries—and other US highways—to be consistent. Transportation Map Series (TRMS): • Revise to update transportation map exhibits TR-1 through TR-6, and TR-8 to reflect transportation map updates, as revised by the MPO and Collier County. Changes Common to All Six Elements: • Housecleaning measures to revise Goals, Objectives and Policies throughout to further consistency with EAR-based re-formatting where re-formatting creates, shifts or re-numbers Objectives or Policies. • Housecleaning measures to revise formal references to Goals, Objectives and Policies throughout to further consistency with EAR-based re-formatting. • Housecleaning measures to replace the informal "#" with the formal "No." or "no." for internal consistency in (provisions not specified above) throughout. Note: the strike through of the number symbol -#- may not be apparent in the exhibit. _7_ (le;;luasueil s;uauapueuiV dlNO Z#433e8 : t7 LI) 1-I3e44t!^ft 3dWPS Zuc;eB-1 AInr :;uauayae;;t, a NL N ti C) Agenda Item 9.A a --. d` • Housecleaning measures to insert parenthetical numerical entries where only written numbers a appear — or written numbers where only numerical entries appear, so as to add clarity in provisions with percentages, distances, counts, timeframes and similar entries not specified above. ADDITIONAL STAFF ACTION and ANALYSES: Amendments to Elements of the Plan have a number of changes in common — within and between Elements. Approval of amendments to these Elements is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear — within and between Elements — as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un- adopted portions of the documents. Environmental Impacts: The above amendments are primarily text and/or map corrections and clarifications, with no amendment resulting in a new change to a future land use designation. Accordingly, these amendments do not intensify the allowable uses or densities. Due to the nature of most of these amendments,there are no new environmental impacts being authorized. A small number of the individual amendments however, particular to Rural Land Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA Overlay) provisions in the FLUE, may produce derivative environmental impacts. These impacts would be limited to those deriving from the addition or removal of Stewardship Sending Areas(SSA)-designated lands to or from the RLSA Overlay and acreage recalculations, as no actual revisions affect the RLSA Overlay future land use designation. Changes to ACSC wetlands protection, by revising text to mirror that found in State law, may lessen the protection for freshwater jurisdictional wetlands. Rather than an outright prohibition on impacts to these freshwater wetlands, such wetlands would be subject to the same protection as those wetlands outside of the ACSC as provided by (County, State and Federal regulations) — including the ability to mitigate for impacts. Public Facilities Impacts: Due to the nature of these amendments, there are no new impacts upon public facilities being authorized. AU IR-based changes to the Level of Service Standards found in the CIE for potable water systems and for wastewater treatment systems are reductions — effectively extending the useful lives of these facilities. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The criteria for land use plan and map amendments are found in Sections 163.3177(6)(a)2. and 8., Florida Statutes. This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney's Office on June 3, 2016. [HFACJ STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL That the EAC forward proposed revisions to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME)and the Future Land Use Element(FLUE)found in Petition CPSP-2013-11 to the Collier County Planning Commission with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. —8 — (Ie;;Iwsue.al s;uewpuawV dL Z#4o1e8 : V£L6) goe};tJ M Id2i"d1S Zya;ea—L'clnr :;ue wyoe;;y N pp LC) ti Agenda Item 9.A a STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: a That the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CPSP-2013-11 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. Attachments: • Executive Summary and White Paper on Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates. [2 items] • Data and analysis supporting FLUM horizon year change. [3 items] [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] —9— (Iewwsueal sluawpuawV dINO z#1131e8 : 'ELL) 40enkt–m ItINTS Z4a1e8 L AIn£ :4uew43am, U, 1.11 N Agenda Item 9. n' m V co a PREPARED BY: Digitally signed by Corby Schmidt DN;Cd1S,E.corbyschmidl@coliergov.net, t3,4,dii;FIprehensrve Planning, Corby Schm�dtDN.OabyScnmdt DATE: 06/20/2016 Dale:2016.06.2208:06:26-04'00' CORBY SCHMIDT,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: Digitally signed by David Weeks David Weeks DN:Glib, E=davidweenning, liergov.net, 0=QM0,OU-Comp Planning,CN.Davld eks 06/20/2016 Date:2018.08.20 14:11:58.04'00 DATE: DAVID WEEKS,AICP,GROWTH MANAGEMENT MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: ..-Punt.rosea er Magi nitE wppot,otivcam CN.MS&.OU.Ce91m MBosI H-�i �daa�. tl 06/22/2016 ,6.M53,ESRVE-0lN DATE: MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR, ZONING DIVISION APPROVED BY: DATE: a / 7,46 JAMES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PPROVED 24:0 7/CA-1 DATE. DAVID S.WILKISON, DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PETITION NO. PL20130002637 I CPSP-2013-11 Staff Report for the June 16, 2016, CCPC Meeting. NOTE: This petition has not yet been scheduled for a BCC Meeting. – 10– 17.A.2 2.3 -The Extent Of Vacant & Developable Land A. Background: Section 163.3191 (2) (b), Florida Statutes, requires Evaluation & Appraisal Reports to assess the extent of vacant and developable land within the relevant jurisdiction. In Collier County, non- residential development is restricted by the nature of the County's Future Land Use Designation provisions. Therefore, it is safe, at least under current conditions. to assume that most vacant and developable land will ultimately be developed either as residential property or as some type of e- agricultural use. E c B. Analysis: Staff's analysis of the acreage and percentage of developed land, as well as that of the vacant and developable land, in Collier County was generated utilizing the most current Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (PAO) tax parcel data; (December 1, 2009). Staff summarized the number of acres per Land Use Code from the Florida Department of Revenue's (FDOR) official land use designations. Please refer to Tables 2.3-1 and 2.3-2. a N L t0 1� s� IX C N +.e f0 ti w 1 Vacant&Developable Land Packet Pg. 2582 17.A.2 Table.2.3.1 ,�:„.�h° °,s,�'�S z .��.� � -x ,y �x•r� .�.^^� ��- �� r'�'�"-�' 'k '�' ¢a* 5c arc2t �., .y .-s, 1 Single Family 76,507 94,925 2 Mobile Homes 3,489 2,722 3 Multi-Family 91 888 4 Condosninia 10,165 10,165 5 cooperatives 51 325 6 Retirement Homes 16 336 7 Boarding Homes(Institutional) 828 2,554 8 Multi-family less than 10 units 1,986 607 E 11 Stores One-Story 474 443 C 12 Mixed Use,i.e.,Store and Office 330 292 I- 14 14 Supermarket 10 13 uj 15 Regional Shopping Malls 4 70 C 16 Community Shopping Centers 174 933 d 17 One-Story Non-Professional Offices 120 112 0 18 Multi-Story Non-Professional Offices 127 191 a) 19 Professional Service Buildings 46 43 Q 20 Airports,Marinas, Bus Terminals&Piers 47 84 0_ 21 Restaurants,Cafeterias 101 92 2 22 Drive-in Restaurants 42 35 0 23 Financial Institutions 85 92 25 Repair Service Shops 27 23 s t.) 26 Service Stations 55 37 27 Automotive Repair,Service,and Sales 181 226 m 28 Parking Lots,Mobile Home Sales 211 787 29 Wholesale,Manufacturing,and Produce Outlets 51 73 ti -.0'3/4,+ 30 Florist,Greenhouses 11 39 32 Enclosed Theaters,Auditoriums 2 11 C 33 Night Clubs, Bars,and Cocktail Lounges 10 6 s 34 Bowling Alleys,Skating Rings,Enclosed Arenas 8 16 Q 35 Tourist Attractions 220 1,651 I 36 Camps 2 22 I 37 Race Horse,Auto,and Dog Tracks 4 555 a- Ct 38 Golf Courses 633 15,034 w 39 Hotels,Motels 79 213 Ci) 41 Light Manufacturing 275 336 CV 42 Heavy Manufacturing 5 41 v 43 Lumber Yards,Sawmills,Planning Mills 15 26 R 44 Fruit,Vegetables,and Meat Packing 30 97 mi 46 Other Food Processing 4 2 f•j 47 Mineral Processing 11 309 c' — c 45 Warehouses,and Distribution Centers 442 556 49 industrial Storage (Fuel,Equip,and Material) 126 145 C 71 Churches 175 808 a) 72 Private Schools 32 403 73 Private Hospitals 15 180 ta 74 Homes for Aged 9 33 Q 75 Orphanages 195 1,262 76 Mortuaries, Cemeteries 15 86 77 Clubs,Lodges,and Union Halls 22 111 78 Sanitariums,Convalescent,and Best Hornet 4 23 79 Cultural Organizations 23 59 Source 2009 Property':c praiser=tecc ms 8 Collier county G>S eata. 7. Vacant&Developable Land Packet Pg.2583 17.A.2 Table 2.3.2 .-,,,z0.4.,x4,;;,auctorrtf,77-c-,T-mittriri-tt--nr:rri-i'-'azY1!)1;1-VV,,t?4,74 4q1',;:;AT*Tiil'Agi Afris:- WRigfri-i-fi j-DT-aAtViMrE5;77-TPNO,Z 0 Vacant Residential 29,658 105,199 10 Vacant Commercial 1,115 1,657 40 Vacant Industrial 204 584 TEs SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL&INDUSTRIAL 30,977 107,439 51 Cropland Soil Class 1 128 18,959 0 c cri 52 Cropland Soil Class 2 121 41,883 ft 1 60 Grazing Land Soil Class 1 845 85,106 0 1 c 61 Grazing Land Soil Class 2 2 1,258 4) E 66 Orchard,Groves, Citrus 268 57,660 -c 67 Poultry, Bees,Tropical Fish, Rabbits,etc. 455 2,659 cu E 69 Ornamentals, Misc.Agriculture 309 3,386 cs a. SUBTOTAL AGRICULTURAL(Code 51-69) 2,128 210,912 E 70 Vacant Institutional 558 15,996 0 cs, SUBTOTAL INISTITUTIONAL 558 15,996 vc ..c Ti,Tr... X0:0201:461M41 ,i01$ 0441401-001W611-4: o CO Source 2009 Proper:y Appratser RecorCs&Colher County GIS dat3 CO ce: N.,..—. v- = Based upon the PAO's records, there are approximately 1.354,936 acres in Collier County. v cts Approximately 138,100 acres or 10 percent of Collier County consist of developed land. In addition, 334,347 acres or 24 percent of Collier County consists of vacant and developable land. I 3 Please refer to the map on page 2.3.4. The Collier Inter-Active Growth Model (CIGM) approved 1 .6. by the BCC in January, 2009, as a supplemental planning tool projected that the build-out rx population for the County would be approximately 950,223. The most recent University of 1 Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research estimate for the County's current population Cs1 -C is 333,032 for April, 2009. The current population estimates (333.032) compared against the c.) ea amount developed land (138.100) equates to .415 acres of developed land per capita. Utilizing co this ratio against the projected build out population of 950,223 would yield a total of 394,343 1 acres of developed land to satisfy the projected population. The total acres of land developed >, (138,100), plus the vacant and developable land (334,347) results in approximately 472.447 of -5 land either developed or developable or expressed another way 20 percent more developable a) land than the population projections would require. It should also be pointed out that the current, .415 acres of developed land per capita is derived in part from antedated large lot zoning (..) cc practices such as the estates. Based upon the regulatory allowances of the GMP the future rate Z't of acres of developed land per capita is expected to diminish. C. Summary: 3 Vacant&Developable Land Packet Pg. 2584 17.A.2 Based upon the data analysis, Collier County appears to have a sufficient amount of vacant and developable land to accommodate future growth. It should be noted that for the 2025 suggested Horizon Year, the most recent University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research projections for the County at year 2025 is 446,400, an increase of 113,368. Based upon the existing ratio of developed to developable land, the County can accommodate the population projected for the Horizon Year. Below is the BEBR projection to the Horizon Year. YEAR PROTECTION 2010 333,600 E 2011 339,786 2012 346,087 2013 352,505 2014. 359,042 a. 2015 365,700 2016 373,518 2017. 381,504 m 2018 389,660 2019. 397,990 2020 406,500 2021 414,184 Qi 2022 422,013 121 tx 2023 429,991tri 2024 438,119 2025 446,400 00 ti w 4 Vacant&Developable Land Packet Pg.2585 N (lelllwsueal sluewpuewd dIN Z# 113128 : PEL .) q3elly M ld2i'11S ZIPWEI-L t(inr :;uewyoeuVCD Q 00 `n N cati C1 u 163.3191.2.b Florida Statutes a, 2.2 -The location of existing development in relation to the location of development as anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. In order to assess the Character and Magnitude of Land Uses in Collier County a study of the four major land uses (Developed, Undeveloped, Conservation/Preservation and Agricultural) was conducted for each of the 12 Planning Communities for the 2004 Collier EAR and to provide consistency in analysis the same structure of comparison was preformed for the 2011 EAR. The analysis (see Table 2.1) demonstrates that development in unincorporated Collier County is not only concentrated within the Urban Planning Communities (North Naples, Central Naples, East Naples, South Naples Golden Gate, Marco, Urban Estates and Immokalee), but has been experienced in the Rural Planning Communities (Royal Fakapalm, Big Cypress, Rural Estates and Corkscrew), as well. These communities, while remaining largely undeveloped, have experienced a larger percentage of growth in developed lands compared against the Urban Planning Communities, The development within the rural planning communities has placed a greater cost for the provision of services to the county's infrastructure providers, as distance is a primary factor within the calculation of cost of service. It should be noted that due to the larger percentage of dedicated conservation/preservation designation that the majority of the acres contained within these communities will remain undeveloped. r F R r ar' 1t `l � € h I [E t i a *tea �ic ,fy 4-* . k" ;" VIC - y,gry+.r a arm }'Om, g .?a a a 'u&` ` Planning _ . : y �. x. � , .� , g Developed Undeveloped Conservation Agricultural Total %of Land Community Land*(less Ag) Land (less Ag) Preservation Land Acres Developed North Naples 13,500 4,381 501 1,123 19,505 69.21% Central Naples 5,743 702 61 156 6,662 86.21% East Naples 3,853 807 19 1,186 5,865 65.69% South Naples 7,543 2,530 989 1,517 12,579 59.97% Golden Gate 6,863 1,254 46 137 8,300 82.69% Marco 1,486 4,741 12,472 1,510 20,209 7.35%_ Urban Estates 14,376 3,474 288 2,904 21,042 68.32% lmmokalee 5,041 789 1,137 10,788 17,755 28.39% Rural Estates 29,634 28,950 114 16,426 75,124 39.45% Corkscrew 12,603 13,464 20,672 134,427 181,166 6.96% Royal Fakapaim 10,104 36,441 230,698 75,715 352,958 2.86% Existing v.Anticipated Development (1e111wsueii sluawpuewd dvgo z#431e8 : t7£LI•) 4oe11`d mn la2J'11S V-Io1e8-L llnr :1uewgloell`d r- N 03 u7 Q N a y.. d ..c u Big Cypress 1 21,218 210 563,658 11,220 596,306 3.56% d Total 131,964 97,743 830,655 257,109 1,317,471 10.02% (Source:2009 Property Appraiser Records&Collier County GIS data) *Includes developed Residential,Commercial,Industrial, Institutional Use land,Government,Golf Courses and R-O-W,Utility,Outdoor Rec.land etc. ;�n w ° r"' .t "+d,y.l ma's 4- s frim r. 6 t ,, ,r,„,i; ,,'* ~o, J + I ky.: q fn:Via', 0. nic `'�3 , ,,u- �A a s ,. ,� i :F cL�.C..a ter e t � � m a, If) ,& d r: -,_"7,,„..--,,;_%:`;„t sem 6°' tt4 .�. � ��-`: Planning Developed Undeveloped Conservation Agricultural Total %of Land Community Land* (less Ag) Land (less Ag) Preservation Land Acres Developed North Naples 13,109 3,547 477 2,372 19,505 67.21% Central Naples 5,333 851 67 411 6,662 80.05% East Naples 3,660 874 16 1,315 5,865 62.40% South Naples 6,281 2,206 1,100 2,992 12,579 49,93% Golden Gate 5,923 2,028 46 303 8,300 71.36% Marco 898 4,512 12,425 2,374 20,209 4.44% Urban Estates 12,291 4,467 232 4,052 21,042 58.41% Immokalee 4,776 1,036 1,326 10,617 17,755 26.90% Rural Estates 21,764 36,998 125 16,237 75,124 28.97% Corkscrew 7,959 12,166 19,522 141,519 181,166 4.39% Royal Fakapalm 8,191 41,280 226,621 76,866 352,958 2.32% Big Cypress 19,912 92 563,507 12,795 596,306 3.34% Total 110,097 110,057 825,464 271,853 1,317,471 8,36% (Source:2003 Property Appraiser Records&Collier County GIS data) *includes developed Residential,Commercial,industrial, Institutional Use land,Government,Golf Courses and R-O-W,Utility,Outdoor Recland etc. The comparison tables shows that the County has experienced a 19.9 percent increase in developed land over the past six years (131,964-110.097/110,097), with a majority of that expansion contained in the 2004-2006 time period. For the period of comparison the BEBR population estimates for the unincorporated area indicate an estimate in 2003 of 260,948 and an estimate in 2009 of 293.909 a 12.6 percent increase {(293,909-260,948)/260,948}. The increase in developed land was not supported by a corresponding rate of population increase for the period of analysis. Clearly a negative consequence associated with the housing bubble of the past decade. Chart 2.1 on the following page illustrates the extent of developed, undeveloped and undevelopable land within the County's land inventory. u Existing v.Anticipated Development (le;;lwsueal s;uawpuewtt dlNO Z# 1-134e8 : VEL I.) yoe;;y M 4dfl S ZL4O e9 L-/(Ind :;uawyoe;;d o0 cv co N a w a) 0 0 Chart 2.1 a I The Extent of Developed,Vacant & Developable land, Vacant& Undevelopable Land within Unincorporated Collier 2009 830,655 Acres acaFs � : 900,000 800,000 a. 700,000 600,000 354,852 Acres �,'� � �� , ket 500,000 l'Al131,964 Acres 3 400,000 .' ` 300,000 2 t 200,000 t� , }""4 . 100,000 Zit; ,,;. , 0 Developed land Vacant&Developable Vacant&Undevelopable Land Land In order to assess developed land uses in Collier County a comparison of Residential, Commercial, Industrial and Institutional uses was conducted for each of the County's 12 Planning Communities, comparing the table generated for the 2004 EAR against the 2011 -- EAR. This analysis is provided for in Table 2.3 and 2.4, and Chart 2.2 and 2.3. t , €ie % 'll0 04 t if ,,edgy :4.;. r-:4'',-',4';'.4,;',,..t. . 4 �, r� .rY ..,., m,:^' A,, xt dt� x14r,�'`.``r.'�i.. tom Planning Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Total Community Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres* North Naples 6,796 1,518 395 432 9,141 Central Naples 2,797 495 406 68 3,766 East Naples 2,251 443 56 83 2,833 South Naples 3,246 369 9 164 3,788 Golden Gate 5,084 186 9 152 5,431 Marco 538 24 9 86 657 Urban Estates 9,018 360 9 219 9,606 Immokalee 1,838 364 147 185 2,534 Rural Estates 23,165 81 692 91 24,029 Corkscrew 1,765 219 52 1,069 3,105_ Faka airn Royal y p I 3,706 1,781 297 161 5,945 Big Cypress 556 72 0 41 669 3 Existing v.Anticipated Development (lellp.usueil swawpuawv dINO Z# Li 31243 : KZ.L.) 110E41V-Aft44114SZ1-13128LAinr 4uaLut.pell,V co co Cl in .'. Csi r•-- 0) +al _ .. co Total 60,760 I 5,912 2,081 I 2,751 1. 71,504 a. (Source:2009 Property Appraiser Records&Collier County GIS data) *Total excludes Government,Golf Course and R-O-W,Utility,Outdoor Rec.land etc c'_ ',i;,,.:4.*: 44t:11.71P2':.1V-t•-•:: ;A:44":164-4,:f`,. ;'-.X-e,:44,7r3,444F-"frze 4,44-&-',44tew: ' i*AVAA070*Agierl" Pr.'*?1, ,„,--;r4Ft:t,"rgetigtiliftr*ISiet '',4414t*A.%tePSAM11.,::`,,:2.:?.4tt,'-7't'L-1V-17;''',t'; '''''':4',•31,'"''''''*"aUlt7e::Psi":‘,414,,e4t, '':.;°0-441iWr''' J:004t4444WP114',OW*A447W4e%#4e*NliAllVeiOW f,',"'tnt,!**14 Planning Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Total Community Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres* North Naples 6,338 1,148 390 495 8,371 Central Naples 2,397 468 429 84 3,378 East Naples 2,190 433 53 121 2,797 South Naples 2,883 431 7 135 3,456 Golden Gate 4,908 175 8 152 5,243 Marco 376 21 9 86 492 Urban Estates 7,875 190 33 165 8,263 Immokalee 1,628 251 133 150 2,162 Rural Estates 16,843 32 558 5 17,438 Corkscrew 1,414 572 52 886 2,924 Royal Fakapalm 3,582 879 310 86 4,857 Big Cypress 635 49 0 34 718 Total 51,069 4,649 1,982 2,399 60,099 (Source:2003 Property Appraiser's Records&Collier County GIS data) "Total excludes Government,Golf Course and R-O-W,Utility,Outdoor Rec land etc. Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional 2003 51,069 4,649 1,982 2,399 2009 I 60,760 5,912 2,081 2,751 Change in Acres 9,691 1,263 , 99 352 Percent Change 18.98% 27.17% 4.99% 14.67% As noted within the analysis for the time period, based upon BEBR estimates, the unincorporated population for the County increased by 12.6 percent, where both the residential and commercial categories increased at a accelerated pace, the institution category was close to alignment with the population increase and the percent increase of industrial land use lagged significantly the population rate of increase. The outpacing of the residential and commercial development compared to the expansion of the population has a 4 Existing v.Anticipated Development 1 (le;;iwsueal s;uewpuawb'dL I Z#4ote8 PcL 6) 4oel�tl nn d2#'�tS Z4o�e8—L Alnr :;uawyoe;;y o' N in Q 1.,- ,A— fl, CV 0 a a5 direct correlation to the surplus of both land use commodities experienced by the County a over the past two years. Chart 2.2 2003 DEVELOPED LAND FOR UNINCORPORATED COLLIER Institutional industrial 3.99% 3.309'a� Commercial 7.74% —' ,,s, ix te- k S � !II;:".....4. '.. �Ct � �'` w i i I Chart 2.3 2009 DEVELOPED LAND Industrial Institutional FOR UNINCORPORATED COLLIER 2.91% 3.85% Commercial 8.27% ; , a t mkt -4:': iii The fallowing charts and maps depict the twelve Planning Communities within the County and the land use breakdowns for each of those Planning Communities 5 Existing v.Anticipated Development (lei}iwsueal s}uewpuew 'dtN Z# 4a�e8 ti£LI.) 4ae}ltt �^ 3d?!'IS Zua4eB L fln� :}uawyae;;y a� N U) Q N nom.. p ,' d' 1 1N' -faNN -adVRjzj Ns m N �1/ � - �N' -„- -W A Y rnd lm - � .ms,�6J • gg N 5 C '"- �;` , áiiii & ;�" ` 2 N d N `'4`<' ; w say �' � >-�� .A -i-,207t2 10 m a� a G �r�y tU Z� Q.10 N ' -� ...- r.„0,,..7..,:.7.:13,:_to.t; _.:„.,._...‘..v..3.4m,,,,„ilw,s14.4171, -ellv,-- -,%--,.-%;--.1,-,,,t-,r,-t,,...N. O 5. D RI O w Y HEND .1' COUNT V $ rn� n' k c b 5 } Zel Z U- r� 5 E t f1 w z o f 0 .:' -14';7:''''''''''''' 'Y'44:44L1 Pli1111111 1 '''- ,, (TiE 8 ttiiii) .52- ,tt,. ..... __. �:o0 �,g � i .4.1zaz,4.:wle-7--- y om r4CNcix�. coo. m Cg , .�'�► h T � C;7> vwns ',:/ Q w j 11. aII pp to,_ ,.. ,::, ,, !1 C.) 6 Existing v.Anticipated Development N (le;;Iwsuei j s;uewpuewy dvg9 z#43;e8 : ti£L i.) 43eu`d nn;d2i'nS Z431e8 L AInr :;uaw43e;;y N 1.0 rs. N coa w as t6 Cl. 1 vl M m .-+ co • t I V ,,....1 cv <-1 m 1 3 u of O t �..�_. i. .,..�,.....__._....._._..-.� .O f O ti N • 1-4 a LJ 7,,' u LA a W.+ ri ,r3.,/ '" ' ! W 1 N 00 -15E ,1 m C o E fa o C _� —J i I 13 1 m °: of o Co,., C f i0 " ° m Q 0. p t_. CI > m I m N M CD ®I ! in QJ 0 di VI , O LT N I b. i 1-1o v 1� Irn C If 1 e 1-c 2 rj if; 01 2CO ' I m I O al i N KM; _ f. . ... ,.s O 2 co U1 V N Q a.' i ni I 1 j j t 1 , 1 1 .. 1 , ;: tri i r` 1 t mw I 1 To @ I i t•••• I d ! 82 €.4. I p t CO is `1 +i3 N y O Y N N v N 1 2 N IO m Q Q. U Y 0 co C R a m N Q u T Q P U u CO u z w v 2 z z z I I g i m m LL D E co O 5 f� Y L O Tora. 1.0 ro c _ N o N N 2 (C 6 G .: O t N {p U IU K i Itr 1 7 Existing v.Anticipated Development (fie}}iwsueal s}uaiupuewy dWJ Z#u°lee : PELL) 43e;1V M ld l4S Z L �Inf:luauay�e��tf 0.1 , N tiCD lid d ""'"•%,„ v CLI CL r y ...�_ ................. ��i� m N L IP a ao } 0 an zto in ° a 00 m 0 v Q L 'i S u° .__,.. - 0 ¢a m m m XzW m ui ...;. till x N K Laca ra tn to N E CO -J 00 0 M LA m m co M W `® oo W 00 N M H u ro co C uN'f as n 73 11Ca # Ale t m � r- �J an rqz i ; o 4 44 1 OO N a N F iVA 11) C07 ti i 2 m et m ''1' E 3 O3 ai v O w d ,n v a) tai w M a) N a) Y Q' 1+ (a V N U Q/ V Q U y to !O t6 L7 L2 a Q C2 Q Nc. Q U T to Y W O W '� C Z Z Z Z .¢ Iii a 0tl6 76 1 0 L N E C '0 r. @ C '•O U 7, 0 .- E �m O 0 CD tt O ` y � Era- > u 2 t.7 w w w Z � E 3 v t v o m _ 5 u rc a 8 Existing v,Anticipated Development 17.A.2 Prepared by Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section May 26,2015. YEAR POPULATION 2010 321,520 estimates 2011 323,785 estimates 2012 329,849 estimates 2013 333,663 estimates 2014 336,783 estimates w° E 2015 343,200 projections ra 2016 349,541 projections T. 2017 356,000 projections cto E 2018 362,578 projections 2019 369,277 projections E 2020 376,100 projections n- 2 2021 382,068 projections 2022 388,130 projections U fQ 2023 394,288 projections CO 2024 400,544 projections `* 2025 406,900 projections 2026 412,447 projections t, c>s 2027 418,069 projections QI 2028 423,768 projections 2029 429,545 projections 2030 435,400 projections N t` 2)Blir e.,,Or Economic And Bo.i.,e.,R...orcn(BEBR)a Un .o,FL. 3)Comer County R.„n 9 r.„ E G\CDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\CPSP-2013-11 Second Batch Amendments\A2A Batch.2 post-CAO Exhi '«fnr CCPC_FINALS\01d CPSP-13-11 Batch.2 Staff Report attchmnt 3 ..Packet Pg. 2594 1 7.A.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a standalone Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment cycle to allow for the removal of the existing maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin from the GMP; in the interim, approve placing in abeyance the discharge rates in the GMP; and, authorize staff to initiate amendments to the Code of Laws and Ordinances and/or Land Development Code (LDC) to add stormwater discharge rates; and, approve a standalone LDC amendment cycle,if needed. Trs ._ OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) to authorize amendments to the Growth c Management Plan (GMP) to remove the existing maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by ro basin and modify, as needed, any GMP related references to those discharge rates for proper form and N clarity; authorize placing in abeyance the discharge rates contained in the GMP; and, authorize amendments to the Code of Laws and Ordinances and/or Land Development Code, as appropriate, to add E sixteen new maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin. a E CONSIDERATIONS: Q Background: The existing conveyance capacity of the County's primary and secondary stormwater and 2 surface water management system is limited. Expansion or enlargement of this system to create 0 additional system capacity is not a viable strategy for managing stormwater flows. The Stormwater u Management Subelement of the Growth Management Plan requires that drainage systems have adequate v stormwater management capacity at the time development permit is issued, and the system be designed m "to ensure that the final outlet point has the adequate capacity to handle all discharges from the upstream portion of the watershed under conditions present at the time of design." Additionally, Policy 6.3 of the ti Subelement requires off-site discharge rates be computed using a storm event of a 3 day duration and 25 year return frequency. Analysis of the system's capacity to accept flow and adequately convey it to a downstream receiving waters resulted in the current maximum allowable post development discharge rates. Six (6) sub-basin areas presently have specified reduced maximum allowable post development Qi discharge rates ranging from 0.04 to 0.13 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre; all other areas of the i County have a maximum allowable post development discharge rate of 0.15 cfs per acre. These discharge n. rates are listed in the Code of Laws and Ordinances, Section 90-41. ce N The Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP, adopted in 1989, required that the C' County develop a watershed management plan by January 1993. After postponement for several years, co the Board of County Commissioners sponsored development of a comprehensive Collier County m Watershed Management Plan (CCWMP) and accepted it in 2011. The unit discharge rates adopted in the ti earlier years were based on preliminary hydraulic analyses. Detailed hydraulic modeling for evaluation >, of the design storm conveyance capacity of the canal network performed as a part of the CCWMP n updated the maximum allowable discharge rates for all of the basins. Two additional detailed stormwater c management master plans, developed jointly by the South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD) a) and the County for the Belle Meade and Immokalee areas in 2005, recommended further limiting the a o discharge rates for sixteen (16) basins/sub-basins. Computer modeling results indicated various segments ct of the system do not have the capacity to handle large storm events. In some cases,the canal banks would <E be overtopped during a 10-year design storm event. Conditions may worsen in the future unless management actions are implemented to control for the impact of subsequent changes to land use. Reducing maximum allowable post development discharge rates in these 16 basin areas is recommended to ensure adequate flood protection levels of service. Packet Pg.2595 17.A.2 Accordingly, amendments to existing ordinances, including the Stormwater Management Subelement are needed to meet the commitments of the GMP by incorporating the limiting discharge rates proposed in CCWMP and the two stormwater master plans.The following benefits are anticipated as a result: • Improved Levels of Service (LOS) for flood protection provided by SFWMD and County operated canals • Enhanced groundwater recharge potential • Restored hydrology and wetlands hydroperiod • Water quality improvement of receiving waters • Reduction of freshwater flows to the estuaries Ta • Gain consistency in Environmental Resource Permitting(SFWMD and County). N Based in part on the CCWMP, the County amended the Stormwater Management Subelement of the GMP by Ordinance No. 15-09 to add stormwater discharge rates for 14 sub-basins. However, some of these rates do not reflect the discharge rates contained within the studies for the Immokalee and Belle Meade areas, and need additional public vetting. Further, staff has confirmed with the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, the agency that oversees all local government comprehensive plans, that these discharge rates are not required to be adopted into the GMP. Removing the discharge rates from the GMP and instead incorporating them into the LDC and/or Code of Laws and Ordinances will allow for an amendment process, as future changes may be needed, that is faster, less costly and less °- cumbersome. t7 N Finally, staff has presented the proposed discharge rate reductions to the Development Services Advisory Committee (DSAC) on three occasions (6/3/15, 11/4/15, and 3/2/16) with assistance from the Big Cypress Basin of the South Florida Water Management District and the engineering consulting firm of Robau and Associates, LLC. Questions and comments were raised by DSAC members and at subsequent M DSAC meetings staff and the consultant team responded to those. Moving forward, the DSAC will continue to review all proposed changes to the LDC and/or Code of Laws and Ordinances and provide comments and recommendations prior to review by the Collier County Planning Commission and the co Board of County Commissioners. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for authorizing standalone GMPA and LDCA cycles, nor for placing in abeyance the discharge rates in the GMP. Costs associated with the text amendments will be accommodated in the current fiscal year budget. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: This item's Growth Management Plan (GMP) impact consists of placing in abeyance the discharge rates listed in the Stormwater Subelement. Text revisions to ns the GMP will be provided to the Board at a subsequent hearing for review and approval. ,moi LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality, and requires majority 5, vote for Board approval. --HFAC a) RECOMMENDATION: To approve a standalone Growth Management Plan amendment cycle to remove the existing maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin and modify, as needed, any GMP related references to those discharge rates for proper form and clarity; authorize placing in abeyance the discharge rates contained in the GMP; authorize staff to initiate amendments to the Code of Laws and Ordinances and/or Land Development Code (LDC) to add sixteen new maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin; and, approve a standalone LDC amendment cycle, if needed Packet Pg.2596 17A.2 Prepared by: Michele R. Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Division, Growth Management Department and David C. Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division, Growth Management Department. Attachments: (1) Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates White Paper (2) Stormwater Management Sub-Element, Policy 6.3 (3) Code of Laws and ordinances, Section 90-41 o E N C5 I- N a) E a) E a 5 0 N V CS) V a I ..: N L C.) Ca ti 1 I A 3 a) E fes. Packet Pg 2597 17.A.2 Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning,Impact Fees&Program Management Division Growth Management Department Co ier Cauvity �� Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates March 23, 2016 Executive Summary Since 1990 (Ord. 90-10), Collier County has had Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates. In most areas of the County,the maximum allowable post development discharge rate is 0.15 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre. There have been six (6) exception areas -areas (sub-basins) with rates more restrictive ranging from 0.04 to 0.13 cfs per acre. These more restrictive rates were established based on modeling studies demonstrating the need to further restrict the runoff rate from adjacent lands based in limited conveyance capacity of the receiving canals. Between 2006 and 2011, three (3) studies were completed which included recommendations to reduce discharge rates in sixteen (16) additional sub-basin areas. In order to proceed with implementation of n. adding these 16 additional reduced discharge rates, Stormwater Planning initiated a vetting process including a feasibility analysis to examine all the effects that could result should some or all of the additional reduced discharge rates be implemented. This process began in May 2015. c m Since May 2015, staff has presented this issue to DSAC three (3) times on June 3, 2015, November 4, yr 2015, and March 2, 2016, with assistance from BCB/SFWMD staff and the Engineering Consulting firm of r Robau &Associates, LLC (R&A). Many related issues have been discussed with DSAC. The following is a list of some key issues with staff comments. Q i 1. Currently Built-Out Basins:Some of the areas where new restrictions are proposed are in basins that are principally built out. Why are you proposing implementation in these areas? Staff: Ce Limited canal conveyance capacity is still relevant in these areas. Redevelopment potential is criI high in older built out areas. Opportunities to decrease runoff at the source will play a key role _c in ensuring adequate flood protection level of service (LOS). 2. Economic Analysis: What is the cost increase to developers that will result when adhering to „1 more restrictive discharge rates? Staff: With DSAC's approval and understanding of the worst- >, case scenario - a high intensity commercial development, R&A completed a detailed analysis and presented it on March 2, 2016. The cost increase as analyzed was approximately 2% of the aa) total site work. The additional cost is due to additional fill. 3. Affected Areas: Every basin should be checked. Staff: Detailed maps of each affected basin are ca being produced using high-level GIS analysis. These maps will show explicit basin boundaries and current land use with the potentially affected area (remaining undeveloped parcels) quantified by area (acres) and by percent of total basin area. 4. Incentives,Vested Rights,etc.: Other related land development regulations should be examined for possible changes that could offset this proposed higher regulatory standard. Staff: Issues such as redevelopment thresholds,vested future development rights(permitted but not Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg.2598 17.A.2 Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning,Impact Fees&Program Management Division Growth Management Department Co 5enty yet built), Low Impact Development(LID) source control initiatives, relaxed parking lot drive aisle elevation requirements, berm side slopes, and buffers are some examples of incentives for consideration that will be examined during this vetting process. Our next step is to seek Board approval to begin the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and Land Development Code (LDC) amendment process. We anticipate going back to DSAC two (2) more times and to the CCPC three (3)times as part of the transmittal and adoption hearings. N C tC Staff is recommending removal of the discharge rates from the GMP with insertion into either the Code of Laws and Ordinances or the Land Development Code. a) Unfortunately, during the 2011 Ear-Based GMP Amendment Cycle which was originated to revise format, structure and language for internal consistency, additional restricted discharge rates as recommended by the Watershed Management Plan (WMP) were prematurely adopted by the BCC as part of the 2015 glitch amendments. Staff will bring an executive summary to the BCC on April 26, 2016 C7 to request that the additional restricted discharge rates be placed in abeyance until the vetting process is complete. m Our professional team working on the initiative consists of Jerry Kurtz, Ananta Nath, Robert Wiley, M Michele Mosca, Liz Gosselin, Jin Xue, Joss De Lestang and Emilio Robau. Monthly County/BCB/SFWMD coordination meetings include regular progress updates on this issue insuring consistent understanding of regulatory application upon final approval and implementation. Background The following information includes an explanation of the history of the issue, the current need for the change, the areas that will be impacted should such an amendment be approved and the steps in the amendment process. D3 1. Surface Water Management and Maximum Allowable Discharge Rates r. The existing conveyance capacity of the County's primary and secondary stormwater and surface water management system is limited. Expansion or enlargement of this system to create additional system capacity is not a viable strategy for managing this issue. Previously completed analysis of the system's capacity to accept flow and adequately convey it to downstream receiving waters resulted in the current maximum allowable post development discharge rates. Subsequent and more recent analysis has been Q completed and the results indicate that sixteen (16) additional basins should have reduced maximum allowable post development discharge rates. Computer modeling results indicate that various segments of the system do not have the capacity to handle large storm events. In some cases,the canal banks are overtopped even during the 10-year design storm event. Conditions would worsen in the future unless management actions are implemented to control for the impact of subsequent changes to land use. Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg.2599 17.A.2 Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning,Impact Fees&Program Management Division Growth Management Department Cntie�x�cv +� Reducing maximum allowable post development discharge rates in these identified areas is one of the most prudent actions recommended to insure adequate flood protection levels of service. 2. Stormwater Management Discharge Rate Restriction History • 1974 — Ordinance 74-50 Establishes Collier County Water Management Policy and implements local design criteria. • 1982 — South Florida Water Management District establishes Pre-development verses Post- development matching discharge design criteria. • 1989 — Collier County adopted its first Growth Management Plan (Ord. 89-05) requiring the t= County to develop a Collier County Watershed Management Plan by 1993. • 1990—Ordinance 90-10 Established additional design criteria, and discharge limitations for four (4) basins including a 0.15 cfs/acre global restriction for the rest of Collier County. c • 2001—Ordinance 01-27 further updated the allowable discharge rates, added two (2) additional basins, and other design criteria. • 2007 — DCA pushes Collier County to fulfill the 1989 Comprehensive plan commitments and n' County adopts interim watershed regulations through a Growth Management Plan Amendment c7 (Ord. 07-16). 0 3. Basins with Specific Discharge Rates m Currently there are a total of six (6) basins with specified reduced maximum allowable post development discharge rates ranging from 0.04 to 0.13 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre. In all other areas of the County the maximum allowable post development discharge rate is 0.15 cfs per acre. Discharge rates are computed using a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year return frequency. Thers current list of basins with specified maximum allowable post development discharge rates can be found �I in Policy 6.3 of Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP), Public Facilities Element, Drainage Sub- Element. This list can also be found in Ordinances 2001-27 and 2007-11, as well as on the County Stormwater Management web page. (7) 4. Growth Management Code References m The fourth paragraph of the introduction of the GMP, Public Facilities Element, Drainage Sub-Element, states that"the stormwater management system has to be designed so as to ensure that the final outlet point has adequate capacity to handle all discharges from the upstream portion of the watershed under conditions present at the time of design". cuE Policy 1.2 of the GMP, Public Facilities Element, Drainage Sub-Element, states that procedures and `i., projects will be designed and implemented in a manner to ensure that adequate stormwater management facility capacity is available at the time a development permit is issued or that such capacity will be available when needed to serve the development. Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg.2600 17.A.2 Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning,Impact Fees&Program Management Division Growth Management Department Cofer Coutyy Goal 2, Objective 2.1., interim standard d, of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element states that limiting discharge rates will be reviewed as part of the Watershed Management Plans and modified accordingly to the analysis and findings of the plans. 5. Basis (Analysis)for Proposed Amendment Four (4) of the recommended maximum allowable post development discharge rates are based on two r (2), 2006 completed stormwater management master plans, the Belle Meade Area Stormwater Master E Plan and the lmmokalee Area Storm water Master Plan. The remainder of the recommended maximum allowable post development discharge rates are based on analysis completed as part of the Watershed 112 Management Plan (2011). m E Belle Meade Area Stormwater Management Master Plan m From page 4-21 of the Belle Meade Area Stormwater Management Master Plan, by Parsons Inc., dated September 2006, "The Belle Meade Basin allowable discharge rates were determined from the study's model results for the 25-year, 3-day design storm". The allowable discharge represents baseline conditions and is needed to maintain flood protection level of service when future land use .c modifications are proposed. In establishing an allowable discharge by watershed the Belle Meade m model area was divided into two watersheds separated by Sabal Palm Road. The peak 25-Year, 3-day m flow from the two watersheds will be divided by the total respective area to determine the allowable ti discharge. This method, approved by SFWMD personnel, is simple to administer and is consistent with the Environmental Resources Permit Information Manual (Volume IV, 2000) developed by SFWMD I Environmental Resources Regulation Division. This method determines the allowable discharge for grouped sub basins and not by individual sub basins." 3i cc lmmokalee Area Stormwater Master Plan The limiting unit discharge rates of 0.05 and 0.10 cfs/acre respectively,for the areas east and west of NI State Road 29 in Immokalee were developed from the outputs of the Stormwater Management Model (XPSWMM) runs of the Immokalee Master Plan project. These rates,were however, not documented in ml the Master Plan report. The model results were subsequently reviewed and summarized by staff from 'moi the South Florida Water Management District Big Cypress Basin office after the report was published. The model inputs/outputs are available in SFWMD files and can be reviewed if further verification is needed. a) Watershed Management Plan Q The Watershed Management Plan (WMP) was accepted by the Board of County Commissioners on December 13, 2011. One of the efforts involved in completing the plan included a computer generated hydraulic conveyance analysis. MIKE SHE/ MIKE 11 computer model results determined the maximum flow that can be conveyed by the various water management canal segments. Results indicated that various segments of the primary and secondary water management systems do not have the capacity to handle large storm events. As previously stated, in some cases, the canal banks are overtopped even Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg.2601 17A.2 Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning,Impact Fees&Program Management Division Growth Management Department Co�er County i"" during the 10-year design storm event. Conditions would worsen in the future unless management actions are implemented to control for the impact of new development. A detailed description of the analysis is provided in the Surface Water Quantity Assessment section in Volume 4 of the WMP. To check the current allowed maximum discharges, as required by the County ordinance, the maximum flow predicted by the computer model was divided by the extent of the drainage area to obtain the actual maximum allowable discharge rate associated with each canal segment. It was found that maximum discharges for many of the County basins needed updating. That c co was expected because the original limits were based on preliminary analyses. I= y Page 11 of Volume 3 of the WMP includes Table 3-3, a list of the recommended maximum allowable discharge rates for additional basins. Fourteen (14) basins are identified for recommended -c modification. Below are three clarifications in reference to this table. (1) Table 3-3 listed the Harvey Canal Basin twice, once as the Harvey Canal Basin and second as the R Island Walk Basin. It is the same basin and the correct name is the Harvey Basin. Its discharge rate CNI has been previously set based on the Harvey Basin Master Plan and is currently addressed in Ordinance 2001-27. No changes to this basin's rate are necessary. ra(2) Table 3-3 references the Henderson Creek Basin. This basin is the same as the Belle Meade et Basin. The source for consideration of this basin's discharge rate modification will be the Belle ti Meade Stormwater Master Plan (BMSMP). The BMSMP split the basin into two parts using Sable Palm Road as the dividing line. _c (3) Table 3-3 indicates that no modification is recommended to the Upper Immokalee Basin. QI Modifications for the Immokalee area basins will be considered using the analysis completed by the 3i Immokalee Area Stormwater Master Plan. This master plan split the basin in half using State Road tx 29 as the dividing line. 6.The Basins and Discharge Rates s tC Current Six Specific Discharge Limitation Basins Rate mi r-- 1. `1. Airport Road North Sub-Basin 0.04 cfs/acre y; (North of Vanderbilt Beach Road) 2. Airport Road South Sub-basin 0.06 cfs/acre (South of Vanderbilt Beach Road) d 3. Cocohatchee Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre 4. Lely Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre cQ 5. Harvey Basin 0.055 cfs/acre(Recommend amending/rounding this off to 0.06 cfs/acre) Q 6. Wiggins Pass Basin 0.13 cfs/acre Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 2602 17:A.2 Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning,Impact Fees&Program Management Division Growth Management Department Com ier�xiv Proposed Additional Basins 1. Henderson Creek Belle Meade Basin (North 0.06 cfs/acre* of Sabal Palm Rd.) 2. Henderson Creek Belle Meade Basin (South of Sabal Palm Road) 0.04 cfs/acre *(Belle Meade MP recommended 0.0375 cfs/acre; recommending rounding to hundredths.) 3. Immokalee Master Plan Area (East of SR 29) 0.05 cfs/acre 4. Immokalee Master Plan Area (West of SR 29) 0.10 cfs/acre 5. CR 951 North Canal Basin 0.11 cfs/acre* 6. C4 Basin 0.11 cfs/acre ELI 7. Corkscrew Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre * 8. Cypress Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre* 9. Faka Union Canal Basin(North of 1-75) 0.09 cfs/acre* 10. Gordon River Extension Basin 0.09 cfs/acre 11. 1-75 Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre* E 12. Imperial Drainage Outlet Basin 0.12 cfs/acre 13. Lely Manor Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre d 14. Main Golden Gate Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre* C9 15. Palm River Canal Basin 0.13 cfs/acre 16. Pine Ridge Canal Basin 0.13 cfs/acre ra *Basins with final outfall to SFWMD/BCB operated canals(8 of 16). M fit, N- 7. Benefits c.) • Improved Levels of Service (LOS) for flood protection provided by South Florida Water Management District and Collier County operated canals 3l • Enhanced Groundwater Recharge • Improved Hydrology and wetlands hydro-period • Reduce Pollution by Source Capture in • Water Quality Improvement of receiving waters Nl • Reduction of freshwater flows to the estuaries as • Gain consistency in Environmental Resource Permitting(SFWMD and County) ml • Fulfill Growth Management Plan Commitments ti 8. Review and Approval Process -'. m Staff is proceeding with BCC approval to begin the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and Land Development Code (LDC) amendment process to remove the existing maximum allowable off-site discharge rates by basin from the GMP; adding the existing six discharge rates and sixteen (16) new Q discharge rates to the LDC. This process is anticipated to take up to a year and a half. Staff anticipates returning to DSAC two (2) more times with prepared amendments for transmittal and adoption hearings. Issues such as redevelopment thresholds,vested future development rights (permitted but not yet built), and possible incentives for consideration will be examined during this process. Attachments: March 2, 2016 DSAC Meeting PowerPoint Presentation Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg 2603 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 1 7.A.4 Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board ofiCounty Commissioners will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December. 13, 20161n the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Th FI€ .C�fer.County Government Center, 3299 E, Tamiami Tr n Nap i the meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. i, i t The purpose of the hearing is to consider: itits, A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COL NTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING COUNTY-INITIATED, E AMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH cn MANAGEMENT:=PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-0S, AS AMENDED; c TO AMEND THE AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN OVERLAY WITHIN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT f— TO PROVIDE-,a;FOR AN AGREEMENT PURSUANT. TO u) SECTION 380.032(3) FLORIDA STATUTES; AND c TO UPDATE AND CLARIFY TEXT AND CORRECT. AP c ERRORS AND OMISSIONS SPECIFICALLY AMENDIN THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; -0 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USEtMAP c AND MAP SERIES; GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN m FUTURE LAND USE MAP; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT c_ SUB-ELEMENT OF;THE PUBLIC' FACILITIES=ELEME ;•=TO Q REMOVE THE DISCHARGE RATES; TRANSPORT ON i- ELEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES; AN THE 2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT; AND FURTHER ORE 0 RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS TO; THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC i OPPORTUNITY.[PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-111 i ,c MI interested parties are invited to appear and be' he Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made itvaili co for inspection at the Zoning Division, Comprehensive Plant .. Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the jhour .4. 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthern re) /'1 the materials will be made available for inspection at the Co re- County County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Governs Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite #401 Naples, one H prior to the scheduled hearing, Any questions ppertainingg to documents should be directed to the Comprehensive;Piani o Section of the Zoning Division. Written comments filed with C Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Tuesday, December 13, di will be read and considered at the public hearing. f r CV If a person decides to'appeal any decision made by the Ca �1 County Board of County Commissioners with respect to - matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will ne{ < record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may r I to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is m V which record includes the testimony and evidence upon w the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accomrnodz co in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitle I no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. PI C) contact the Collier County Facilities Management Departn U located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#101, Naples,a 3, 03 5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior, to the mee Assistedlistening devices for the hearing impaired are aval c inthe Board of County Commissioners Office. c BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA � DONNA F ALA,'CHAIRMAN . DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Teresa Cannon, Deputy Clerk(SEAL) November 26,_2016 No. 13.--a 1%D Saturday, November 26, 2016 N Packet Pg. 2604 x r_ . x „ 17.A.5 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on Tuesday,December 13,2016 in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor, Collier County Government Center,3299 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples,FL.The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING COUNTY-INITIATED AMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, TO AMEND THE AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN OVERLAY WITHIN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO PROVIDE FOR AN AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.032(3) FLORIDA STATUTES; AND TO UPDATE AND CLARIFY TEXT AND CORRECT MAP ERRORS AND OMISSIONS SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; 76 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP w en AND MAP SERIES; GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN 0 FUTURE LAND USE MAP; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT u) SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT TO c REMOVE THE DISCHARGE RATES; TRANSPORTATION F ELEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES; AND THE E- a CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT; AND FURTHERMORE en =5 RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS o.) z TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC o OPPORTUNITY.[PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11) m c 3 All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. P IT, Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available Q ;, for inspection at the Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning orn Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of a. o 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M.. Monday through Friday. Furthermore C7 the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier °' County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government N ZCenter, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite #401 Naples, one week = Ilii .a prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the a documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning co a+ Section of the Zoning Division.Written comments filed with the ca G Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Tuesday,December 13,2016 •- zu will be read and considered at the public hearing. M r--- Z Z If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier @ County Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a M `" record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, a which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which — the appeal is to be based. co If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation aci in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please Q contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, . located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East.Suite#101,Naples,FL 34112- ca 5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. 76 Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. J BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS E' COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA m DONNA FIALA,CHAIRMAN :_ DWIGHT E. BROCK,CLERK V By: Teresa Cannon,Deputy Clerk(SEAL) November 26,2016 No. 1375149 Q Packet Pg. 2605 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS 1111...- 2013 Batch#2 GMP AMENDMENTS (TRANSMITTAL HEARING) [Petitions: Project PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11] CCPC: October 20, 2016 [continued from June 16, 2016 & July 07, 2016] BCC: December 13, 2016 Clerk's Office EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . a't 39 Fit 1 `.9 1 - i tI 9 ' d8t i C y5. ° j'gc > ' 1 ; is � �;°° F i s to � i i ' � . F i i t , s i i a . t z t i ; + p s ' i arimr a : I i 4 t S 7 73 # 10 d ! . 94 i I i i I ' d G ° °P!i i i i3 ".f t 9 i i '+ ii f 1 e i5 t `i1 $ 1 (C.` i ii i• IP A ? E ' < i M: ? t1 36 ➢: £ Y9k :'v: &5I N# 1 t / s : /Iff F ;t 4" ii F is i , OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to approve several individual staff- initiated amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan(GMP)for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity(DEO). CONSIDERATIONS: • Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government's adopted Growth Management Plan. • The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the "local planning agency" under Chapter 163.3174, F.S. and the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC), held their Transmittal hearings for petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 on July 7, 2016 and October 20, 2016. • This is the Transmittal hearing for these out of Cycle, staff-proposed amendments to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series, Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map, Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facility Element,Transportation Element and Transportation Map Series,and the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. The amendments that are the subject of this hearing are limited in scope primarily to those directed by the Board following the adoption of 2011 EAR-based GMP amendments and previous batch GMP amendments. Though not necessarily recommended by specific reference in the EAR,these mostly general updating and "housecleaning" amendments seek to add clarity, correct text and map errors or omissions, provide harmony and internal consistency among components of the Plan, and so forth. A specific set of changes to the Future Land Use Element(FLUE)Overlays and Special Features Section follow from Board direction to amend Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) Overlay provisions. Another small number of these staff-initiated changes are associated with recent amendments proposed for or adopted in the Land Development Code(LDC),changes in the 2014 or 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports(AUIR), or with changes in State or Federal regulations, and to revise format, structure and language to follow other Board directives. Further explanation and staff analysis is provided in the CCPC Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts to Collier County result from this amendment, as this approval is for the Transmittal of this proposed amendment. However, the costs associated with legal advertising/public notice for the public hearings are borne by the County. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of these proposed amendments by the Board for Transmittal and their submission to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity will commence the Department's sixty (60)-day state coordinated review process and ultimately return these amendments to the CCPC and the Board for final Adoption hearings to be held in 2017. - 1 - LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality. A majority vote of the Board is needed for adoption of the Resolution and transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic (DEO). [HFACJ COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL: That the EAC forward proposed revisions to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) and the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) found in Petition CPSP-2013- 11 to the CCPC with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the Planning Commission, sitting as the EAC, forward proposed revisions to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) and the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) found in Petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 to the Board with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the Planning Commission forward Petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 to the Board with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, subject to a change to the ACSC Overlay in the FLUE made at their October 20th meeting — to withdraw that portion of the amendment noted in the Staff Report Addendum that proposed to provide for a variance to be applicable to certain essential services uses and instead replace that with an allowance for agreements pursuant to Chapter 380.032(3),F.S. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition at their July 7, 2016 and October 20, 2016 meetings. There were no public speakers to this item on July 7. One person spoke to this item on October 20, with remarks focused predominantly on ACSC provisions — and expressed support for staff's replacement language regarding agreements per Florida Statute. The CCPC forwarded petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 to the Board with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, as presented by staff (vote: 5/0), subject to revisions to the Future Land Use, Capital Improvement, Conservation and Coastal Management, and Transportation Elements; these revisions are mostly reflected in the Addendum for the October 20 CCPC meeting and all CCPC-recommended revisions are reflected in Resolution Exhibit"A". STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: Same as the CCPC's recommendation—to transmit petition PL-20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity subject to all revisions recommended by the CCPC. Prepared by: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, and David Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager,Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division, Growth Management Department -2 - Agenda Item 9.E Co e-r _etyr.s.-serty ADDENDUM to STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 20, 2016 RE: PETITION NO. PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11, STAFF-PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES,AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] Modifications have been made, per CCPC discussion and consensus at the July 7 CCPC hearing, to portions of the Transmittal Resolution Exhibit "A." These changes are denoted and briefly explained below. No changes were discussed to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map or Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element, and these portions of the Transmittal Resolution Exhibit "A" are unchanged from their July 7 versions. Also, one new provision is added to the FLUE, an allowance for variance to the Area of Critical State Concern regulations for certain essential services. The added text and explanation/justification is provided within the FLUE portion of this report (pages 3-5). Formatting explanation: Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted —as presented to CCPC on 7/7/16. Words double underlined are added; words are deleted — per 7/7/16 meeting. CCME: Policies 7.1.2(2), 7.1.2(2)(a), and 7.1.2(2)(c): Include a public awareness program for new preserves as part of habitat management plans for listed species and other protected species, to educate residents about preserves within their developments and the need to maintain the habitat within preserves, as follows (for multiple species, not just scrub jay): Policy 7.1.2: (2) Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species and for those protected species identified below shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated indicates listed species or the protected species identified below are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Mana'ement .lans for new 'reserves shall also outline a .ublic awareness .ro am to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain habitat within the preserve for listed species and those protected species identified below. — 1 — Agenda Item 9.E (a) Management plans for new preserves shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species, and those protected species identified below, and their habitat from the negative — impacts of proposed development. Developments shall be clustered to discourage impacts to listed species habitats. Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses, and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** (c) Habitat preservation plans for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) are required and shall conform to the guidelines contained in Technical Report No. 8,Florida else provide for a maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. The plan shall also outline a public awareness program to educate rcsidcnts about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain the scrub vegetation. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph(3) of this policy. Coincides with similar changes in the FLUE. Policy 10.5.1: Clarify the type of recreation which is compatible with the natural functions of beaches and dunes on undeveloped shorelines; providing context within the Policies supporting Objective 10.5, as follows: Policy 10.5.1: Passive Rrecreation that is compatible with the natural functions of beaches and dunes is shall be regarded as the highest and best land use. Policy 10.5.4: Provide clarity regarding the scope of prohibited structures, as follows (change "shall" to "may"): Policy 10.5.4: The County shall may pProhibit construction of any structure seaward of the Coastal Construction Setback Line. Exceptions shall be allowed for passive recreational structures, access crossovers, and where enforcement would not allow any reasonable economic utilization of such property. In the latter event,require construction that shall minimizes interference with natural functions of such beaches and dunes. Policy 12.1: Remove redundancy and correctly identify the agency name, as follows: OBJECTIVE 12.1: Maintain hurricane evacuation clearance times as required by state law. An evacuation clearance time shall be is defined as having residents and visitors in an appropriate refuge away from storm surge prior to the arrival of sustained Tropical Storm force winds, i.e., winds equal to or greater than 39 mph. To further this °Objective, for future mobile home developments located outside of the storm surge zone, such development shall is to include on-site sheltering or retro-fitting of an adjacent facility. The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall continues to seek –2– Agenda Item 9.E opportunities to increase shelter facilities and associated capacities under the direction of the Department of the Florida Division of Emergency Management. CIE: Policy 5.3 D., now 5.5 D.: Update/correct map references, as follows: Policy 5.3 5: D. The necessary facilities and services are under construction or under contract pursuant to a FDOT 5-Year Work Program and are consistent with the Collier County a0a4 2040 Long Range Needs Plan or the 2030 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan(LRTP), as adopted by the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization(MPO); or FLUE: Objective 4 and Policy 4.1: Correct mid-sentence capitalization and clearly indicate requirements for planning "studies", as follows: OBJECTIVE 4: Continually refine the Future Land Use Element through detailed planning in ha order to improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development,I4housing and urban design, - - - . . - . _ - - - --- - .. - - Policy 4.1: Planning studies must be consistcnt with the Growth Mana =- _- ' : =: _: -_ - - - , :- may address specific geographic or issue areas. ACSC: To list of exotic plant species, delete an errant reference to multiple species ("spp.") where the specific species is listed. Also, though the specific species name listed may, or may not, remain accurate, no change is made so as to be identical to that listed in State law. Substantively, and new to this petition, the following changes are made - all added text is at end of the ACSC Overlay: 1)As allowed by Rule Chapter 28-25, F.A.C., Land Planning —Part Ill Boundary and Regulations for Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, add provision for the Land Development Code (LDC) variance process to be applicable to ACSC regulations, and provide that the LDC will be amended, as necessary, within one year to implement this allowance; 2) limit the applicability of the variance to select essential services; 3) advise the reader that this variance allowance does not alter the allowable essential services beyond that provided for under the future land use designation and zoning; 4)for essential services directly related to development, limit the variance to that necessary to serve development as presently allowed by the GMP and zoning; 5) provide criteria — taken from the variance section of the LDC; 6) specify the particular ACSC regulations that are subject to the variance process; and, 7) as required by Ch. 28-25, provide that the variance can only be approved where the development is designed to have minimum adverse impacts. Staff did not originally include this variance provision because it was thought that the amendment needed to include significant parameters for the variance and there was not adequate time to do so; staff intended to bring this variance provision forward as a separate GMP amendment at a later time. However, based upon recent communications with the ACSC Review Team at the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO), staff is now of the opinion that the amendment proposed will be acceptable to DEO staff. —3 — Agenda Item 9.E The genesis for this added text are three circumstances that have arisen over the past three or so years for different properties lying within the ACSC (and, some limitations are added to address concerns raised by DEO staff as they reviewed various drafts of this amendment). First, Everglades City needed to expand their water treatment plant located in Copeland that would have necessitated impacting wetlands. Ultimately, they were able to revise their proposed site plan so as not to run afoul of ACSC limitations. Second, the Seminole Tribe of Florida desires to develop a small site (1.84 acres) with an essential service/community center use that may impact wetlands and will exceed the 10% site alteration limitation. Third, the Lee County Electric Co-op needs to expand development on an existing power substation site that will exceed the 10% site alteration limitation and impact protected wetlands (site is 5.45 acres; development dates to 1974). None of these three scenarios promote, or result in, more development occurring in the ACSC beyond that already allowed by present future land use designations and zoning. Staff is of the opinion that all three circumstances are examples of where some relief to the stringent requirements of the ACSC regulations appear to be appropriate. Four of the essential services listed in the amendment may serve development and/or serve those travelling through the ACSC — police, fire, emergency medical services, communication towers. Therefore, staff does not propose that a variance for those facilities be limited to serving development as presently allowed by the existing GMP and zoning, whereas other essential services (water, gas, phone, electricity) are subject to such a limitation. Three variance criteria are proposed, each taken verbatim from LDC Sec. 9.04.03, Criteria For Variances. However, the LDC provides that these, and five other criteria, are standards for consideration by the CCPC in formulating a recommendation to the board of zoning appeals, and these criteria apply only to zoning numerical standards—setbacks, height, buffer dimensions, number of signs and parking spaces, etc. The LDC provides the CCPC with broad latitude in considering zoning variances. Staff proposes that at least one of the three criteria in the FLUE must be met in order for the variance to be granted and, of course, the variance is applicable to limitations in the ACSC regulations, -- not zoning standards. The variance would only apply to the three ACSC regulations that are most impacting/restricting to proposed development, as identified in the three examples cited above, and that are numerical standards (10% maximum site alteration limitation; 50% maximum of the site alteration area for non- permeable surface limitation; 100% limitation to alter or destroy specified plant species). Staff emphasizes that the types of essential service uses for which the variance would be applicable is limited, as reflected in the draft language; the amount of development (residential, commercial, etc.) allowed by existing zoning and FLUM designations, for which essential services might be needed, is limited for the vast majority of the ACSC — notable exceptions are a portion of the RLSA, Rural Lands Stewardship Area, and the Copeland Urban designated area; and, the vast majority of the ACSC land area is owned by various government agencies (90%), mostly for conservation purposes (e.g. Big Cypress National Preserve, Florida Panther NWR, Ten Thousand Islands NWR, Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park). The ACSC regulations were established over forty years ago. The stated purposes of the ACSC regulations, as expressed in Ch. 28-25, are: "to conserve and protect the natural, environmental and economic resources and the scenic beauty of the Big Cypress Area, including ... ecologically related wetlands, estuarine fisheries, and the fresh water aquifer, and ecologically related areas. It is the further purpose of these regulations to provide a land and water management system that will preserve water quality, provide for the optimum utilization of the limited water resources of the area, facilitate orderly and well-planned development, and protect the health, welfare, safety and quality of life of the residents of the state." Therefore, it is appropriate that any variance allowance be limited in scope so as not to undermine the purposes of the ASCS regulations. —4— Agenda Item 9.E A. Area of Critical State Concern Overlay *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** *** c. Soils exposed during site alteration shall be stabilized and retention ponds or performance equivalent structures or systems maintained in order to retain run off and siltation on the construction site. Restoration of vegetation to site alteration areas shall be substantially completed within 180 days following completion of a development. Re-vegetation shall be accomplished with pre-existing species or other suitable species except that undesirable exotic species shall not be replanted or propagated. Exotic Undesirable exotic species are listed below. Australian Pine- (Casuarina spp) Bishopwood- (Bischofia javanica) Brazilian Pepper- (Shinus terebinthfolius) Melaleuca(cajeput) - (Melaleuca leucadendra ) *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** *** Formatting explanation for the following section only: Words underlined are added; words are deleted — as they appear in the Addendum to the Staff Report dated September 1, 2016. Words double underlined are added; words are deleted — per further revisions prepared for the October 20, 2016 CCPC. All Development Orders issued for projects within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern shall be rendered to the State of Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for review with the potential for appeal to the Administration Commission per Chapter 73C-44, Florida Administrative Code, "Community Planning, Development Order Requirements for Areas of Critical State Concern". In accordance with Chapter 28-25.011, F.A.C., the zoning variance procedure contained in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ord. No. 04-41, as amended, shall be applicable to the ACSC Regulations. Within one year of the effective date of this amendment establishing the applicability of the variance procedure, the variance procedure and criteria in the Collier County Land Development Code shall be amended, as necessary, to address ACSC regulations. Any variance to the ACSC regulations shall be subject to the following restrictions: A variance shall only be applicable to essential services consisting of those services and facilities necessary to promote and protect public health, safety and welfare, limited to the following: police; fire; emergency medical;all services designed and operated to provide water,scwsr,gas., telephone,electricity,Gabls4cAGA,47sion or communications to the general public by providers that have been approved and authorized according to laws having appropriate jurisdiction. This shall not be deemed to allow such essential services uses where the underlying future land use designation or zoning designation does not allow such uses. A ariance shall onl .e . anted •ertainin• to water_.as tele I h.ne or electrici where those essential service s- are desi. ed to serve develo.ment as allowe• b the • owth mana.ement plan and zoning regulations in effect as of the date of adoption of this amendment ( 20171. (c) A variance shall only be granted if it is demonstrated that: there are special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size, and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved; or there are special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant, such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property —5— Agenda Item 9.E which is the subject of the variance request; or the variance, if granted, will be the minimum variance that will make .ossible the reasonable use of the land buildin' or structure and which promote standards of health, safety, or welfare. (d) A variance shall onl be a.•licable to the followin. three ACSC re' lations: site alteration limitation of 10%of the total site size; installation of non-permeable surfaces limitation of 50% of the site alteration area• and 100% limitation on alterin or destro in s.ecified man ove trees and salt marsh grasses,by area. (e)094 No variance shall be granted for any development within the ACSC unless such develo.ment is designed to have minimum adverse impact on the ACSC's water storage capacity, surface water and estuarine fisheries. RLSA Policies 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3: Withdraw proposed changes to RLSA Overlay FSA, HSA and WRA acreage figures—to be reconsidered at a later date. Also withdraw the initially-proposed corrections to the "HAS" acronym to read "HSA" remain, as the acronym appears correctly in the adopting Ordinance [2002-54]. RLSA Policies 5.5.2., 5.5.2.a., and 5.5.2.c.: Include a public awareness program for new preserves as part of habitat management plans for listed species and other protected species, to educate residents about preserves within their developments and the need to maintain the habitat within preserves, as follows: Policy 5.5: 2. Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species and for those protected species identified below shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated indicates listed species or the protected species identified below are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Management plans for new preserves shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain habitat within the preserve for listed species and those protected species identified below. 2.a. Management plans for new preserves shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species, and those protected species identified below, and their habitats from the negative impacts of proposed development. Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors. 2.c. Habitat preservation plans for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) are required and shall conform to the guidelines contained in Technical Report No. 8,Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. The required management plan shall else provide for a maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the nccd to These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS —6— Agenda Item 9.E ,., South Florida Multi Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph(3) of this policy. Coincides with similar changes in the CCME. Transportation Element: Objective 3 and Policy 3.5: Clarify the type of development agreements, studies, plans and programs; providing context within the Policies supporting Objective 3, as follows: OBJECTIVE 3: Provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights-of-way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program Board a roved development agreements., mer the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies,plans and programs. Policy 3.5: A. The County is considering the viability of a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP) ordinance and land development regulations that: 1. identify, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway network shown on the County's Long Range Transportation Plan, Board approved development agreements,the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's(MPO's)adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies,plans and programs; and *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** -- All of the above must be consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, agreements, plans and programs, and Chapter 336.02, Florida Statutes. Policy 5.5: Delete specific name of an agency so as to retain only a generic name reference, as follows: Policy 5.5: Commercial developments within the South US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification to the Transportation Planning Department County transportation planning agency ,: -:_: , : _ _ . . •_ • ' ... _ __ • _ • - - - -- - - `- - ----- - that at least four (4) of the following Transportation Demand Management(TDM) strategies will be utilized: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** An applicant seeking an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation through the certification mentioned above shall submit an application to the Transportation Division Administrator County transportation planning agency , . ..• _ -_ •_ _ • _ _ _ • • L - - ! __.. •• _ on forms provided by the Division agency. Binding commitments to utilize any of the above techniques relied upon to obtain certification shall be required as a condition of development approval. Map TR-1: Remove 1-75 interchange at Everglades Blvd.; add a note at bottom of map; and, make general map corrections. Map TR-2: Remove 1-75 interchange at Everglades Blvd.; add a note at bottom of map; and, add to legend and map face an interchange study area. G:\COES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments(PSP-2013-11 Second Batch Amendments\aaa Batch.2 Materials G Sept 01 CCPC\Olaaa CPSP-13-11 Batch 2 Stall Rpt Add lr Oct 20 CCPC.docx dw/8-4.16;dw,nab.cs/10.7.16 —7— Agenda Item 9.A cote rer co-ra1lty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: JULY 7, 2016, CONTINUED FROM JUNE 16, 2016 RE: PETITION NO. PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11, STAFF-PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT, FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES, GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT, TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES,AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] REQUESTED ACTION and STAFF ANALYSIS: This proposal consists of several individual staff-initiated amendments, as authorized or directed by the Board of County Commissioners to six Elements of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Most of these are "housecleaning" or "glitch" amendments intended to add clarity, correct text and map errors or omissions, and provide harmony and internal consistency among components of the GMP. A number of these Board-directed changes are not substantive but are predominately corrective in nature and follow direction provided by the adopted 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). Another small number of these staff-initiated changes are associated with recent amendments proposed for or adopted in the Land Development Code (LDC), changes in the 2014 or 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR), or with changes in State or Federal regulations, and to revise format, structure and language to follow other Board directives, and to properly reflect staff functions. Additionally, staff is proposing a substantive amendment to the Stormwater Management Sub-Element to remove the stormwater off-site discharge rates and replace with a reference to the Land Development Code; and, an amendment to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element to remove references to the Stormwater Management Sub-Element and the Water Resource Ordinance (No. 2001-27) related to the off-site discharge rates and replace with references to the Land Development Code — as approved and directed by the BCC on April 26, 2016 (refer to the attached Executive Summary and White Paper on Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates). As provided by Ordinance 10-37,this Staff Report also serves to provide guidance to the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) in making a recommendation on the proposed amendments to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element(CCME)and the Future Land Use Element (FLUE)to carry forward through hearings by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County Commissioners (BCC). Each amendment is identified below, followed by a brief explanation/analysis. The proposed amendments themselves make up the individual Exhibit"A"s accompanying the Transmittal Resolution. — 1 — Agenda Item 9,A Conservation &Coastal Management Element (CCME); • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction -- revise Goals, Objectives and Policies for proper language format of a GMP Objective and Policy, as follows: Objectives 1.1, 2.1, 4.2, 5.4, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 10.1, 10.5, 12.1, 12.2, 12.4; and Policies 1.1.1, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 3.1.4.1, 10.5.1, 10.5.2, 10.5.3, 10.5.4, 10.5.6, 10.5.7, 10.5.8, 10.5.9, 10.5.12, 11.1.1, 12.1.8. These were overlooked and did not specifically appear in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR- based GMP Amendments. • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Goals, Objectives and Policies for proper language format, capitalizing references to specific Elements, Goals, Objectives and Policies, as follows: Policies 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 2.1.1 through 2.1.7, 3.1.4, 6.1.1, 6.1.2.e, 6.1.2.(1), (3), (4), (5),(8)and(10), 6.1.5,6.1.9, 6.2.4, 6.2.4.(2), 6.2.5, 6.2.5.(1), (1)a, (3),(4),(6)a.4, and(6)a.5, 6.2.6, 6.2.7, 6.2.7(2) and (3), 6.2.9, 6.5.2(1), (3), (4) and (6), 6.2.6, 6.2.7, 6.2.9, 6.5.2(1), 7.1.1(6), 7.1.2(2)(a)2 and 3, 7.1.2(2)(c), (d), (e) and (g), 7.2.2, 10.4.3, 10.6.1, 10.6.1(6), 12.1.4, 12.3.1. These were overlooked and did not specifically appear in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR- based GMP Amendments. • Revise Objective 2.1 to redirect references provided in subsection "a." from the Stormwater Management Sub-Element [where off-site discharge rates are presently listed] to the Land Development Code[where new off-site discharge rates are to be listed], per April 26, 2016 Board direction; also, revise Objective 2.1 to redirect references provided in subsection "d." from "Ordinance 2001-27, adopted May 22, 2001" [where basins are presently established and off- site discharge rate limits are set]to the County Land Development Code[where new information is to be listed], per April 26, 2016 Board direction; the subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Objective 2.1 subsection "a." to identify the specific citation in an updated version of a document previously provided by placeholder language here. • Revise Policy 3.1.4 to provide full entries, internal consistency and clarity, to reflect changes to LDC provisions for development within Wellfield Risk Management Zones, and re-number accordingly. • Revise Policy 3.3.2 to correct Board name and map series; map reference cannot be to both the "Countywide FLUM" and the"FLUM Series"—the Wellfield Risk Management Zone map is part of the "series". • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Policy 6.5.2 to identify the specific citation in an updated version of a document previously provided by placeholder language here. • Revise Objective 7.1 and Policy 7.1.2 (as with revisions proposed in the FLUE) to delete no longer needed references to specific publications used by the FFWCC and USFWS for technical assistance, as found elsewhere in Policy 7.1.2, and, revise for proper language format throughout. Also revise to address USFWS and FFWCC changes in regulations governing protection and management of listed species. Proposed changes to the CCME retain requirements for management plans for development, for bald eagle and Florida black bear. Requirements for management plans in the Policy are consistent with the requirements and goals of the Bald Eagle Management Plan (http://myfwc.com/media/427567/Eagle Plan April 2008.pdf) and —2— Agenda Item 9.A Florida Black Bear Management Plan (http:llmvfwc.com/media/2612908/bear-management- plan.pdf) adopted by the State. A major goal of the Florida Black Bear Management Plan is to reduce human-black bear conflicts by educating residents who live in areas where black bears occur, about black bears and to secure trash, a major attractant to black bears. For bald eagle, establishing nest protection zones around nests of bald eagle and limiting activities that can occur in the nest protection zones or when certain activities can occur within these zones,remain as criteria used by the State for development. These criteria along with delineation of the nest protection zones on site plans approved by the State are in turn included on site plans for development approved by the County. • Remove/revise Policies 10.1.6 and 10.3.15 to implement proposed changes to LDC provisions for development within the Special Treatment Zoning Overlay. • Revise Policy 12.1.4 to reflect updated agency name. • Revise Policy 12_1 14 to reflect updated edition of reference document. • Revise Policy 12.3.3 to reflect updated agency names and position titles. Capital Improvement Element(CIE): • Revise Policy 1.1 to introduce the parenthetical acronym before its first appearance/use in this Element unaccompanied by its parent term. • Revise to update Level of Service Standards (LOSS) in Policies 1.5.D and 1.5.E, as adjusted by the 2014 Water Master CIP Plan and the 2015 AUIR. The Water LOSS was adjusted from 170 gpcd to 150 gpcd in the 2014 AUIR approved by the BCC on November 10, 2014, reflecting the updated historical analysis contained in the 2014 Water Master CIP Plan,also Appendix III to the 2015 AUIR approved by the Board on November 10, 2015. The North Service Area Wastewater Treatment LOSS was adjusted from 120 gpcd to 100 gpcd in the 2014 AUIR approved by the BCC on November 10, 2014, reflecting the updated historical analysis contained in the 2014 Water Master CIP Plan, also Appendix III to the 2015 AUIR approved by the Board on November 10, 2015. The South Service Area Level of Service Standard (LOSS) has remained unchanged since 2001 at 100 gpcd. The northeast service area has been incorporated into the north service area,and the southeast service area has been incorporated in the south service area. • Revise Policy 4.1 to reflect changes to Florida Statutes by HB 7207 [which is now Chapter 2011- 139, Laws of Florida], in particular the deletion of the restriction limiting amendments of the comprehensive plan to no more than twice a year, and to the descriptions of corrections and modifications on amendments to the CIE. • Revise Policy 4.2 to allow adoption of the Collier County School District capital improvement plan and facilities work program documents by reference, previously requiring each specific updated version of these documents to be adopted each year with the annual update to the Schedule of Capital Improvements. This revision also reflects changes to Florida Statutes by HB 7207 [which is now Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] • Revise Objective 5 to introduce a formal title in text before its standards are established and described later in this Element. • Revise Policies 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 for internal consistency, per adopted 2011 EAR direction to discontinue use of "zero"—based entries under Objectives; these were —3— Agenda Item 9.A overlooked and did not specifically appear in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMP Amendments.This re-formatting shifts and re-numbers existing supporting Policies and changes cross references between Policies, under this Objective, and in Programs to Insure Implementation subsection V.6.C. • Revise Policy 5.3.D to reflect name-change of agency. • Revise the "footnotes" that provide brief explanations of revenue sources and their acronyms found in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in accordance with changes made in previous AUIRs. Future Land Use Element (FLUE): • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction--revise Objectives and Policies for proper language format of a GMP Objective and Policy, as follows: Objectives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7; and Policies 1.1 through 1.5, 2.1 through 2.6, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1 through 4.10, 5.1 through 5.14, and 6.1 through 6.5. This re-formatting creates new supporting Policies taken from the Objective in numerous locations,and shifts and re-numbers existing supporting Policies under these Objectives. These were overlooked and did not specifically appear in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMP Amendments. • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise Policies for proper language format, capitalizing references to specific Policies, as follows: Policies 5.10, 7.5; Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA Overlay) Policies 3.11, 4.16, 4.18, 4.20, 4.21, 5.5.2.a.ii and, a. iii, 5.5.2.b through 2.f, 5.5.2.g, 5.6 and 5.6.3.a.i and 3.c and 3.f.iv; and RLSA Overlay Attachment"C". These were overlooked and did not specifically appear in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR- based GMP Amendments. • Revise to update Policy references in the introductory FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES list affected by changes to Objectives and Policies for proper language format throughout. • Eliminate ASI (Area of Significant Influence) option from Policy 2.2 as a corrective measure necessitated by recent statutory changes regarding areas of significant influence and to maintain consistency between documents. • Revise to update CIE Policy references in Policy 2.5; now 2.6, revised by the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMP Amendments. • Revise to update Policy reference in Policy 3.1.j; now 3.2.j, affected by changes to Objectives and Policies for proper language format throughout; also revised likewise in Policy 5.1.a, now 5.3.a; Policy 5.1.d, now 5.3.d; Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict subsection g.; Density Rating System subsection 1.e.1), and in Future Land Use Map Series listing. • Insert parenthetical numerical entries where only written numbers appear, or written numbers where only numerical entries appear, so as to add clarity [in these page 42 Subdistrict provisions]. More such housecleaning revisions occur later in document, for instructional and regulatory entries. • Insert parenthetical percentage entries where only written percentages appear, or written -- percentages where only numerical percentage entries appear, so as to add clarity [in Density ---4— Agenda Item 9.A Rating System provision B.2.c.] More such housecleaning revisions occur later in document, for instructional and regulatory entries. • Revise to replace numerical entry with written number [in Density Rating System provision B.4.a.] • Revise Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands provision A) 4.b) to update name of State agency, and remove name of County agency who is not specifically involved with Wildfire Prevention and Mitigation Planning. • Revise Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Sending Lands provision C)6. to extend TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) Sending Lands Early Entry Bonus horizon to September 27, 2018 per (April 28, 2015) Board direction. • Revise Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, Receiving Lands provision D) 3.a) to indicate certain LDC provisions have been amended as instructed by this provision. • Revise to update Policy reference in Estates Designation statements affected by changes to Objectives and Policies for proper language format throughout. • Revise Overlay and Special Features' provision V.A. to read same as State ACSC (Area of Critical State Concern)regarding prohibited impacts to wetlands,to amend the prohibited plants list to include all of those in the LDC, to reorganize/restructure the Overlay, correct an internal reference, and to reference the Ochopee area lying within [but exempted from] the Overlay. • Revise Overlays and Special Features, Receiving Areas provision V.B.3.to standardize the use of words in legal descriptions, replacing the less frequent use of numerical fractions. More such housecleaning revisions occur later in document. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 1.6 to reflect statutory changes concerning the EAR based amendment process. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 1.22 to reflect name-change of State agency. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policies 3.1, 3.2 & 3.3 to reflect updated acreage figures for these land areas, based upon changes to these designations since first being identified. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 4.3 to indicate certain LDC provisions have been amended as instructed by this provision, remove the "one time" activity implied, and indicate an ongoing relationship between such amendments. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 4.4 to reflect statutory changes concerning the EAR based amendment process. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 4.18 to provide for an alternative/alternatives to application of the FIAM per Board direction. • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 5.5 (as with revisions proposed in the CCME) to delete no longer needed references to specific publications used by the FFWCC and USFWS for technical assistance, and; revised for proper language format throughout. [Refer to the extended CCME Objective 7.1 and Policy 7.1.2 note above for additional explanation.] • Revise RLSA Overlay Policy 5.6 to remove date specificity to reflect that the time period provided for has passed and action has occurred. • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction — revise RLSA Overlay Policy 5.6 to identify the updated version of a specific document initially overlooked here. —5— Agenda Item 9.A • Replace the informal "#" with the formal "No." or "no." for internal consistency in Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay provisions and throughout. Note: the strike through of the number symbol-#- may not be apparent in Exhibit"A". • Revise RLSA Overlay Attachment "C" footnote to recognize the correct Policy. Note: the underlining visible in the body of the table does not connote any proposed amendment, as the only change is to a footnote. Future Land Use Map Series (FLUMS); • Revise the Countywide FLUM to provide for current mapping; identifying the geographic area of Ochopee that lies within the boundary of the ACSC [by delineation and notation] but is exempt from ACSC regulations,and update the horizon year from 2025 to 2030. Pertaining to the FLUM horizon year extension, data and analysis regarding land use inventories and future needs is attached,taken from the 2011 EAR, and population projections are provided as revised in 2015. This data and analysis indicates there is adequate land to support the projected population in the new FLUM horizon year of 2030. Note that the population projection prepared in 2015 for the new horizon year of 2030 (435,400) is less than the population projection for year 2025 contained in the 2011 EAR(446,400). • Revise the RLSA Stewardship Overlay Map to provide for current mapping; reflecting the addition of Stewardship Sending Area(SSA)No. 16 and the removal of SSA No.8; and, removal of areas designated Conservation from the RLSA. • Revise titles in the 4 Properties Consistent by Policy inset maps [EXFLU_Maps 9, 10, 11 & 12] to update Policy references affected by changes to Objectives and Policies for proper language format throughout. • Revise to update the 19 Activity Center inset maps (throughout)to provide for current mapping; adding an informational zoning note/disclaimer in each map's legend, updating the base maps' underlying zoning, developed parcel & building footprint information, updating the base maps' parcel split and subdivision information, and updating road changes(intersection improvements & realignments, ROW widenings & reconfigurations, etc., e.g. Davis Blvd./CR 951 and US 41/CR 951. Golden Gate Area Master Plan Area-wide Map(GGAMP): • Revise to update the GGAMP Area-wide FLUM to provide for current mapping; depicting the PRC&M PUD [Palm Royale Cemetery & Mausoleum] area on south side of Vanderbilt Beach Rd. between CR 951 & Logan Blvd. The southerly "outlot" that abuts Cherry Wood Drive is within Golden Gate Estates thus is within the GGAMP Estates land use designation. Stormwater Management Sub-Element: • Revise Objective 6 to remove superfluous text. • Revise Policy 6.2 to reflect updated edition of reference document. • Revise Policy 6.3 to remove listing of off-site discharge rates, and move them to the County Land Development Code, per April 26, 2016 Board direction. —6— Agenda Item 9.A Transportation Element(TE): • Revise entries under the introductory List of Tables/Maps/Figures and Future System Needs section to update text references to reflect transportation map updates, as revised by the MPO and Collier County. • Revise Future System Needs section to update text references to reflect transportation map updates, as revised by the MPO and Collier County. • Revise Intermodal&Multi-Modal Transportation section to reflect name-change of agency; also revised likewise in Perspectives section, the Introduction, Objective 3, Policy 3.5, Policy 6.1, Policy 11.3 and Policies 12.1 & 12.2. • Revise Perspectives section subsection heading to remove redundancy. • Revise Objective 3 and Policy 3.5 to properly reflect staff functions in their consideration of documents that identify transportation improvement projects. • The subject of adopted 2011 EAR direction —revise Goals, Objectives and Policies for proper language format of a GMP Objective and Policy, as follows: Policy 3.1. This was overlooked and did not specifically appear in the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMP Amendments. • Revise Policy 5.5 to reflect name-change of department/director. Insert parenthetical numerical entries where only written numbers appear, or written numbers where only numerical entries appear. More such housecleaning revisions occur later in document. • Revise to update CIE Policy references in Policy 5.6 and Policy 5.7, revised by the 2013 Ordinance adopting EAR-based GMP Amendments. • Revise throughout to correctly use the "US 41" highway designation that officially, has no periods, as with"U.S.41"and no hyphenation,as with"US-41". Change all US 41 entries—and other US highways—to be consistent. Transportation Map Series (TRMS): • Revise to update transportation map exhibits TR-1 through TR-6, and TR-8 to reflect transportation map updates, as revised by the MPO and Collier County. Changes Common to All Six Elements: • Housecleaning measures to revise Goals, Objectives and Policies throughout to further consistency with EAR-based re-formatting where re-formatting creates, shifts or re-numbers Objectives or Policies. • Housecleaning measures to revise formal references to Goals, Objectives and Policies throughout to further consistency with EAR-based re-formatting. • Housecleaning measures to replace the informal "#" with the formal "No." or "no." for internal consistency in (provisions not specified above) throughout. Note: the strike through of the number symbol -#-may not be apparent in the exhibit. —7— Agenda Item 9.A • Housecleaning measures to insert parenthetical numerical entries where only written numbers appear — or written numbers where only numerical entries appear, so as to add clarity in provisions with percentages, distances, counts, timeframes and similar entries not specified above. ADDITIONAL STAFF ACTION and ANALYSES: Amendments to Elements of the Plan have a number of changes in common — within and between Elements. Approval of amendments to these Elements is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms,wherever they appear — within and between Elements -- as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un- adopted portions of the documents. Environmental Impacts: The above amendments are primarily text and/or map corrections and clarifications,with no amendment resulting in a new change to a future land use designation. Accordingly, these amendments do not intensify the allowable uses or densities. Due to the nature of most of these amendments,there are no new environmental impacts being authorized. A small number of the individual amendments however, particular to Rural Land Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA Overlay) provisions in the FLUE, may produce derivative environmental impacts. These impacts would be limited to those deriving from the addition or removal of Stewardship Sending Areas(SSA)-designated lands to or from the RLSA Overlay and acreage recalculations, as no actual revisions affect the RLSA Overlay future land use designation. Changes to ACSC wetlands protection, by revising text to mirror that found in State law, may lessen the protection for freshwater jurisdictional wetlands. Rather than an outright prohibition on impacts to these freshwater wetlands, such wetlands would be subject to the same protection as those wetlands outside of the ACSC as provided by (County, State and Federal regulations) — including the ability to mitigate for impacts. Public Facilities Impacts: Due to the nature of these amendments, there are no new impacts upon public facilities being authorized. AUIR-based changes to the Level of Service Standards found in the CIE for potable water systems and for wastewater treatment systems are reductions —effectively extending the useful lives of these facilities. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The criteria for land use plan and map amendments are found in Sections 163.3177(6)(a)2. and 8., Florida Statutes. This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney's Office on June 3, 2016. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL That the EAC forward proposed revisions to the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME)and the Future Land Use Element(FLUE)found in Petition CPSP-2013-11 to the Collier County Planning Commission with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. —8— Agenda Item 9.A STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: That the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CPSP-2013-11 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to Transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. Attachments: • Executive Summary and White Paper on Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates. [2 items] • Data and analysis supporting FLUM horizon year change. [3 items] [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] —9— Agenda Item 9. PREPARED BY: praline by Corby ScMnidt DN:C=US,E=corbysclonklt@coNergov.net, CorbySchmidt �° ;r•te„ •Plamkg. Date:2016.06.22 08:0526-04'00' DATE 0 6/2 0/2 016 CORBY SCHMIDT,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: Digitally signed by David Weeks David Weeks DN:t ,OU davidweenning,ller vaZt, �t3MD,DU=Comp Planning,CN=David weeks 06/20/2016 Data:2016,06.2014:11:56.04'00' DATE: DAVID WEEKS,AICP,GROWTH MANAGEMENT MANAGER COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: all E.nelo,mq,yppeprpWr,mp,,CN.M•eal,CWCaBW MBost �°. "°�'�` M� 06/22/2016 DATE:aw:mt enssz r sszasaea o• MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR,ZONING DIVISION APPROVED BY: (2. DATE: C fa 7/ 4 JAMES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT CA,VED DATE: 6 :7 % DAVID S. WILKISON, DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PETITION NO. PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 Staff Report for the June 16, 2016, CCPC Meeting. n NOTE: This petition has not yet been scheduled for a BCC Meeting. — 10— 2.3 a The Extent Of Vacant& Developable Land A. Background: Section 163.3191 (2) (b), Florida Statutes, requires Evaluation & Appraisal Reports to assess the extent of vacant and developable land within the relevant jurisdiction. in Collier County. non- residential development is restricted by the nature of the County's }'uturc Land Use Designation provisions. Therefore. it is safe. at least under current conditions.to assume that most vacant and developable land will ultimately be deli eloped either as residential property or as some type of agricultural use. B. Analysis: Staffs analysis of the acreage and percentage of developed land, as well as that of the vacant and developable land, in Collier County was generated utilizing the most current Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (PAO) tax parcel data= (December I. 20091. Staff summarized the number of acres per Land Use Code from the Florida Department of Revenue's (FDOR) official land use designations. Please refer to Tables 2.3-1 and 2.3-2. 1 Vacant& Developable Land Table.2.3.1 1 Single Family 76,507 94,925 2 Mobile Homes 3,489 2,722 3 Multi-Family 91 888 4 Condominia 10,165 10,165 5 cooperatives 51 325 6 Retirement Homes 16 336 7 Boarding Homes(Institutional) 828 2,554 8 Multi-family less than 10 units 1,986 607 11 Stores One-Story 474 443 12 Mixed Use,i.e.,Store and Office 330 292 14 Supermarket 10 13 15 Regional Shopping Malls 4 70 16 Community Shopping Centers 174 933 17 One Story Non-Professional Offices 120 112 18 Multi Story Non Professional Offices 127 191 19 Professional Service Buildings 46 43 20 Airports,Marinas,Bus Terminals&Piers 47 84 21 Restaurants,Cafeterias 101 92 22 Drive-in Restaurants 42 35 23 Financial Institutions 85 92 25 Repair Service Shops 27 23 26 Service Stations 55 37 27 Automotive Repair,Service,and Sales 181 226 28 Parking Lots,Mobile Home Sales 211 787 29 Wholesale,Manufacturing,and Produce Outlets 51 73 30 Florist,Greenhouses 11 39 32 Enclosed Theaters,Auditoriums 2 11 33 Night Clubs,Bars,and Cocktail Lounges 10 6 34 Bowling Alleys,Skating Rings,Enclosed Arenas 8 16 35 Tourist Attractions 220 1,651 36 Camps 2 22 37 Race Horse,Auto,and Dog Tracks 4 555 38 Golf Courses 633 15,034 39 Hotels,Motels 79 213 41 Light Manufacturing 275 336 42 Heavy Manufacturing 5 41 43 Lumber Yards,Sawmills,Planning Mills 15 26 44 Fruit,Vegetables,and Meat Packing 30 97 46 Other Food Processing 4 2 47 Mineral Processing 11 309 48 Warehouses,and Distribution Centers 442 556 49 Industrial Storage(Fuel,Equip,and Material) 126 145 71 Churches 175 808 72 Private Schools 32 403 73 Private Hospitals 15 180 74 Homes for Aged 9 33 75 Orphanages 195 1,262 76 Mortuaries,Cemeteries 15 86 77 Clubs,Lodges,and Union Halls 22 111 78 Sanitariums,Convalescent,and Best Homes 4 28 79 Cultural Organizations 23 59 Source:2009 Property Appraiser Records 8 Collier County GIS data. 2 Vacant&Developable Land "` Table 2.3.2 r ` , ' ' - x 0 Vacant Residential 29,658 105,199 10 Vacant Commercial 1,115 1,657 40 Vacant Industrial 204 584 SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL,COMMERCIAL& INDUSTRIAL 30,977 107,439 51 Cropland Soil Class 1 128 18,959 52 Cropland Soil Class 2 121 41,883 60 Grazing Land Soil Class 1 845 85,106 61 Grazin: Land Soil Class 2 2 1,258 66 Orchard,Groves, Citrus 268 57,660 67 Poultry, Bees,Tropical Fish, Rabbits,etc. 455 2,659 69 Ornamentals, Misc.Agriculture 309 3,386 SUBTOTAL AGRICULTURAL(Code 51-69) 2,128 210,912 70 Vacant Institutional 558 15,996 SUBTOTAL INISTITUTIONAL 558 15,996 TOTAL *Oa Source.2009 Property Appraeser Records&Coil County GIS data. Based upon the PRO's records, there are approximately 1,354,936 acres in Collier County. Approximately 138,100 acres or 10 percent of Collier County consist of developed land. In addition, 334,347 acres or 24 percent of Collier County consists of vacant and developable land. Please refer to the map on,page 2.3.4. The Collier Inter-Active Growth Model (CIGM) approved by the BCC in January, 2009, as a supplemental planning tool projected that the build-out population for the County would be approximately 950,223. The most recent University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research estimate for the County's current population is 333,032 for April, 2009. The current population estimates (333,032) compared against the amount developed land (138,100) equates to .415 acres of developed land per capita. Utilizing this ratio against the projected build out population of 950,223 would yield a total of 394,343 acres of developed land to satisfy the projected population. The total acres of land developed (138,100), plus the vacant and developable land (334,347) results in approximately 472,447 of land either developed or developable or expressed another way 20 percent more developable land than the population projections would require. It should also be pointed out that the current, .415 acres of developed land per capita is derived in part from antedated large lot zoning practices such as the estates. Based upon the regulatory allowances of the GMP the future rate of acres of developed land per capita is expected to diminish. C. Summary: 3 Vacant&Developable Land Based upon the data analysis. Collier County appears to have a sufficient amount of vacant and developable land to accommodate future growth. It should he noted that for the 2025 suggested Horizon Year, the most recent University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research projections for the County at year 2025 is 446.400, an increase of 113,368. Based upon the existing ratio of developed to developable land. the County can accommodate the population projected for the Horizon Year. Below is the BEBR projection to the I Iorizon Year. YEAR PROJECTION 2010 333,600 2011 339,786 2012 346,087 2013 352,505 2014 359,042 2015 365,700 2016 373,518 2017 381,504 2018 389,660 2019 397,990 2020 406,500 2021 414,184 2022 422,013 2023 429,991 2024 438,119 2025 446,400 4 T'acant& Developable Land 163.3191.2.b Florida Statutes 2.2 -The location of existing development in relation to the location of development as anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. In order to assess the Character and Magnitude of Land Uses in Collier County a study of the four major land uses (Developed, Undeveloped, Conservation/Preservation and Agricultural) ' was conducted for each of the 12 PIanning Communities for the 2004 Collier EAR and to provide consistency in analysis the same structure of comparison was preformed for the 2011 EAR. The analysis (see Table 2.1) demonstrates that development in unincorporated Collier County is not only concentrated within the Urban Planning Communities (North Naples, Central Naples, East Naples, South Naples Golden Gate, Marco, Urban Estates and Immokalee), but has been experienced in the Rural Planning Communities(Royal Fakapalm, Big Cypress, Rural Estates and Corkscrew), as well. These communities, while remaining largely undeveloped, have experienced a larger percentage of growth in developed lands compared against the Urban Planning Communities. The development within the rural planning communities has placed a greater cost for the provision of services to the county's infrastructure providers, as distance is a primary factor within the calculation of cost of service. It should be noted that due to the larger percentage of dedicated conservation/preservation designation that the majority of the acres contained within these communities will remain undeveloped. Character and ' Land Prepare• r1 6 . . Planning Developed Undeveloped Conservation Agricultural Total %of Land Community Land*(less Ag) Land(less Ag) Preservation Land Acres Developed North Naples 13,500 4,381 501 1,123 19,505 69.21% Central Naples 5,743 702 61 156 6,662 86.21% East Naples 3,853 807 19 1,186 5,865 65.69% South Naples 7,543 2,530 989 1,517 12,579 59.97% Golden Gate 6,863 1,254 46 137 8,300 82.69% Marco 1,486 4,741 12,472 1,510 20,209 7.35% Urban Estates 14,376 3,474 288 2,904 21,042 68.32% Immokalee 5,041 789 1,137 10,788 17,755 28.39% Rural Estates 29,634 28,950 114 16,426 75,124 39.45% Corkscrew12,603 13,464 20,672 134,427 181,166 6.96% Royal Fakapalm 10,104 36,441 230,698 75,715 352,958 2.86% 1 Existing v.Anticipated Development Big Cypress 21,218 210 _ 563,658 11,220 596,306 3.56% Total 131,964 97,743 830,655 257,109 1,317,471 10.02% (Source:2009 Property Appraiser Records&Collier County GIS data) *Includes developed Residential,Commercial,Industrial, Institutional Use land,Government,Golf Courses and R-O-W,Utility,Outdoor Rec.land etc. . Character and Magnitude of Land(P're. red in 2003) ate, � 7., � �. Planning Developed Undeveloped Conservation Agricultural Total %of Land Community Land* (less Ag) Land (less Ag) Preservation Land Acres Developed North Naples 13,109 3,547 477 2,372 19,505 67.21% Central Naples 5,333 851 67 411 6,662 80.05% East Naples 3,660 874 16 1,315 5,865 62.40% South Naples 6,281 2,206 1,100 2,992 12,579 49.93% Golden Gate 5,923 2,028 46 303 8,300 71.36% Marco 898 4,512 12,425 2,374 20,209 4.44% Urban Estates 12,291 4,467 232 4,052 21,042 58.41% -. Immokalee 4,776 1,036 1,326 10,617 17,755 26.90% Rural Estates 21,764 36,998 125 16,237 75,124 28.97% Corkscrew 7,959 12,166 19,522 141,519 181,166 4.39% Royal Fakapalm 8,191 41,280 226,621 76,866 352,958 2.32% Big Cypress 19,912 92 563,507 12,795 596,306 3.34% Total 110,097 110,057 825,464 271,853 1,317,471 8.36% (Source:2003 Property Appraiser Records&Collier County GIS data) •Includes developed Residential,Commercial.Industrial, Institutional Use land,Government,Golf Courses and R-O-W,Utility,Outdoor Rec.land etc. The comparison tables shows that the County has experienced a 19.9 percent increase in developed land over the past six years (131,964-110,097/110,097), with a majority of that expansion contained in the 2004-2006 time period. For the period of comparison the BEBR population estimates for the unincorporated area indicate an estimate in 2003 of 260,948 and an estimate in 2009 of 293,909 a 12.6 percent increase {(293,909-260,948)/260,948}. The increase in developed land was not supported by a corresponding rate of population increase for the period of analysis. Clearly a negative consequence associated with the housing bubble of the past decade. Chart 2.1 on the following page illustrates the extent of developed, undeveloped and undevelopable land within the County's land inventory. 2 Existing v.Anticipated Development Chart 2.1 The Extent of Developed,Vacant& Developable land, Vacant&Undevelopable Land within.Unincorporated Collier 2009 830,655 Acres ACRFS 400,000 ' 800,000 700,000 600,000 354,852 Acres 500,000 131,964 Acres 400,000 300,000 r 200,000 - ,, $% f , v '11 100,000 0 Developed land Vacant&Developable Vacant&Undevelopable Land Land In order to assess developed land uses in Collier County a comparison of Residential, Commercial, Industrial and Institutional uses was conducted for each of the County's 12 Planning Communities, comparing the table generated for the 2004 EAR against the 2011 EAR. This analysis is provided for in Table 2.3 and 2.4,and Chart 2.2 and 2.3. Table 2.3 Land Use of Developed Lands for Unincorporated; Collier (Prepared in 2009 Planning Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Total Community Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres* North Naples 6,796 1,518 395 432 9,141 Central Naples 2,797 495 406 68 3,766 East Naples 2,251 44356 83 Erni South Naples 3,246 369 9 164 3,788 Golden Gate 5,084 186 9 152 5,431 Marco 538 24 9 86 111131 Urban Estates 9,018 360 9 219 9,606 Immokalee 1,838 364 147 185 2,534 Rural Estates 23,165 81 692 91 24,029 Corkscrew 1,765 219 52 1,069 3,105 Royal Fakapalm 3,706 1,781 297 161 5,945 Big Cypress 556 72 0 41 669 3 Existing v.Anticipated Development Total I 60,760 I 5,912 I 2,081 l 2,751 171,504 (Source:2009 Property Appraiser Records&Collier County GIS data) *Total excludes Government,Golf Course and R-O-W,Utility,Outdoor Rec.land etc, Table 2.4 Can Use • e evil + • d nds for Ununcl a orate•f it'�a a.x e .i " Planning Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Total Community Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres* North Naples 6,338 1,148 390 495 8,371 Central Naples 2,397 468 429 84 3,378 East Naples 2,190 433 53 121 2,797 South Naples 2,883 431 7 135 3,456 Golden Gate 4,908 175 8 152 5,243 _..__........_._-- Marco 376 21 9 86 492 Urban Estates 7,875 190 33 165 8,263 Immokalee 1,628 � 150 2,162 Rural Estates 16,843 5 17,438 Corkscrew 1,414 572 52 886 2,924 "--... Royal Fakapalm 3,582 879 310 86 4,857 Big Cypress 635 49 0 34 718 Total 51,069 4,649 1,982 2,399 60,099 (Source:2003 Property Appraisers Records&Collier County GIS data) Total excludes Government,Golf Course and R-O-W,Utility,Outdoor Rec.land etc. Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional 2003 51,069 4,649 1,982 2,399 2009 60,760 5,912 2,081 2,751 Change in Acres 9,691 1,263 99 352 Percent Change 18.98% 27.17% 4.99% 14.67% As noted within the analysis for the time period, based upon BEBR estimates, the unincorporated population for the County increased by 12.6 percent, where both the residential and commercial categories increased at a accelerated pace,the institution category was close to alignment with the population increase and the percent increase of industrial land use lagged significantly the population rate of increase. The outpacing of the residential and commercial development compared to the expansion of the population has a 4 Existing v.Anticipated Development direct correlation to the surplus of both land use commodities experienced by the County over the past two years. Chart 2.2 2003 DEVELOPED LAND FOR UNINCORPORATED COLLIER Institutional Industrial 3.9996 3.30% I Commercial— 7.74% \ Residential 84.97% 1 Chart 2.3 2009 DEVELOPED LAND FOR UNINCORPORATED COLLIER Industrial Institutional 2.91% 3.85% Commercial I 8.27% kms,: i Residential 8497% air i The following charts and maps depict the twelve Planning Communities within the County and the land use breakdowns for each of those Planning Communities 5 Existing v.Anticipated Development COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMUNITIES a` !: I!i"jj:iT' III cl..m. emCOMMUNITIES coRKSCREW RD UM o� .. ples7-Royal Fakapalm• �, ��® --, Naples 6-Rural Estates \``d 3-Golden Gate 9-Corkscrew 4-East Naples 10-Immokalee 5-South Naples 11-Big Cypress JEE CCUN �,oKuff Ro 6-Mo12Urantates 11 rr=. { FIE LNATAGs'.ftKllIESTROnMpCO ..• aI- 9l m '1 . viai RD ty O 4. o c" CITY OF NAPLES T- . P Qr b R O 11MMOCK RO {���} Zl 4 1y/ Po Z 44111, CID CITY OF MARCO ISLAND - • ���-.., kik K „ _ ,,,,, " F EVERGLADES CITY e MilesNs.s41,ill tr 0 1.5 3 6 9 12 { 2009 Land Use Developed Lands . 1 Big Cypress L J Royal Fakaplam I. _.1 Corckscrew a Rural Estates h — -- — Immokalee st 1 0o Urban Estates -. !_mow , � Marco P... 1 Golden Gate j South Naples t, I cat East Naples e10Central Naples a a North Naples ' 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 j North central Ecypress i ast Naples. S°uth 'Golden Gate! Marco Urban Immokalee Rural I CordsC S Royal f B, Naples j Naples , Naples Estates Estates Fakaplam i ' 64 5 91 1,069 1 161 Industrial Institutional Acres Acres ' 395 406 56 19 92 86 99 692 52 i 14797 01 1 aCommercial Acres° 1,518 1 495 443 369 186 24 360 j 364 81IL 21.9 i 1,781 72 f i a Residential Acres ! 6,796 2,797 2,251 3,246 5,084 538 9,018 1,838 ! 23,165 1 1,765 3,706 ! 556 r."\ 2003 Land Use Developed Lands Big Cypress i , , , Royal Fakaplam i' i 1 i Corckscrew Film , Rural Estates s -- i Immokalee _ - Ifit `t Urban Estates DO Marco ITTT Z. Golden Gate '� I " I 1 P...\, aSouth Naples a � East Naples 3 b° m Central Naples ti North Naples € { T 3 , 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 North Central East Naples 1 SoMh 'Golden Gate, Marco UrbanImmokaleeRural 1 Corckscrew "al Big Cypress Naples , Napkes I Naples : Estates Estates J Fakaplam 1 •Institutional Acres 1 495 I 84 121 i ' 135 152 1 86 i 165 j 150 5 1 886 86 I 34 1-Industrial Acres I 390 I 429 53 j 7 8 9 ' 33 133 i 558 I 52 310 1 0 a Commercial Acres'1 1,148 468 433 j 431 i 175 21 190 1 251 32 572 i 879 49 I 1 f Residential Acres j 6,338 2,397 == 2,190 , 2,883 1 4,908 376 7,875 1 1,628 ; 16,843 1,414 I 3,582 635 a I 1 Prepared by Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section May 26,2015. YEAR POPULATION 2010 321,520 estimates 2011 323,785 estimates 2012 329,849 estimates 2013 333,663 estimates 2014 336,783 estimates 2015 343,200 projections 2016 349,541 projections 2017 356,000 projections 2018 362,578 projections 2019 369,277 projections 2020 376,100 projections 2021 382,068 projections 2022 388,130 projections 2023 394,288 projections 2024 400,544 projections 2025 406,900 projections 2026 412,447 projections 2027 418,069 projections 2028 423,768 projections 2029 429,545 projections 2030 435,400 projections sources: 1) U.S.Census Bureau 2)Bureau of Economic and Business Research(BEBR)at Univ.of FL. 3) Collier County Planning staff G:\CDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\CPSP-2013-11 Second Batch Amendments\A2A Batch.2 post-CAO Exhibits for CCPC_FINALS\01d CPSP-13-11 Batch.2 Staff Report attchmnt 3 by-dw/5-2015 4-2016 This page intentionally left blank EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a standalone Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment cycle to allow for the removal of the existing maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin from the GMP; in the interim, approve placing in abeyance the discharge rates in the GMP; and, authorize staff to initiate amendments to the Code of Laws and Ordinances and/or Land Development Code (LDC) to add stormwater discharge rates; and, approve a standalone LDC amendment cycle,if needed. OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) to authorize amendments to the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to remove the existing maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin and modify, as needed, any GMP related references to those discharge rates for proper form and clarity; authorize placing in abeyance the discharge rates contained in the GMP; and, authorize amendments to the Code of Laws and Ordinances and/or Land Development Code, as appropriate, to add sixteen new maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin. CONSIDERATIONS: Background: The existing conveyance capacity of the County's primary and secondary stormwater and surface water management system is limited. Expansion or enlargement of this system to create additional system capacity is not a viable strategy for managing stormwater flows. The Stormwater Management Subelement of the Growth Management Plan requires that drainage systems have adequate stormwater management capacity at the time development permit is issued, and the system be designed "to ensure that the final outlet point has the adequate capacity to handle all discharges from the upstream portion of the watershed under conditions present at the time of design." Additionally, Policy 6.3 of the Subelement requires off-site discharge rates be computed using a storm event of a 3 day duration and 25 year return frequency. Analysis of the system's capacity to accept flow and adequately convey it to downstream receiving waters resulted in the current maximum allowable post development discharge rates. Six (6) sub-basin areas presently have specified reduced maximum allowable post development discharge rates ranging from 0.04 to 0.13 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre; all other areas of the County have a maximum allowable post development discharge rate of 0.15 cfs per acre. These discharge rates are listed in the Code of Laws and Ordinances, Section 90-41. The Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP, adopted in 1989, required that the County develop a watershed management plan by January 1993. After postponement for several years, the Board of County Commissioners sponsored development of a comprehensive Collier County Watershed Management Plan(CCWMP) and accepted it in 2011. The unit discharge rates adopted in the earlier years were based on preliminary hydraulic analyses. Detailed hydraulic modeling for evaluation of the design storm conveyance capacity of the canal network performed as a part of the CCWMP updated the maximum allowable discharge rates for all of the basins. Two additional detailed stormwater management master plans, developed jointly by the South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD) and the County for the Belle Meade and Immokalee areas in 2005, recommended further limiting the discharge rates for sixteen(16)basins/sub-basins. Computer modeling results indicated various segments of the system do not have the capacity to handle large storm events. In some cases,the canal banks would be overtopped during a 10-year design storm event. Conditions may worsen in the future unless management actions are implemented to control for the impact of subsequent changes to land use. Reducing maximum allowable post development discharge rates in these 16 basin areas is recommended to ensure adequate flood protection levels of service. Accordingly, amendments to existing ordinances, including the Stormwater Management Subelement are needed to meet the commitments of the GMP by incorporating the limiting discharge rates proposed in CCWMP and the two stormwater master plans.The following benefits are anticipated as a result: • Improved Levels of Service (LOS) for flood protection provided by SFWMD and County operated canals • Enhanced groundwater recharge potential • Restored hydrology and wetlands hydroperiod • Water quality improvement of receiving waters • Reduction of freshwater flows to the estuaries • Gain consistency in Environmental Resource Permitting(SFWMD and County). Based in part on the CCWMP, the County amended the Stormwater Management Subelement of the GMP by Ordinance No. 15-09 to add stormwater discharge rates for 14 sub-basins. However, some of these rates do not reflect the discharge rates contained within the studies for the Immokalee and Belle Meade areas, and need additional public vetting. Further, staff has confirmed with the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, the agency that oversees all local government comprehensive plans, that these discharge rates are not required to be adopted into the GMP. Removing the discharge rates from the GMP and instead incorporating them into the LDC and/or Code of Laws and Ordinances will allow for an amendment process, as future changes may be needed, that is faster, less costly and less cumbersome. Finally, staff has presented the proposed discharge rate reductions to the Development Services Advisory Committee (DSAC) on three occasions (6/3/15, 11/4/15, and 3/2/16) with assistance from the Big Cypress Basin of the South Florida Water Management District and the engineering consulting firm of Robau and Associates, LLC. Questions and comments were raised by DSAC members and at subsequent DSAC meetings staff and the consultant team responded to those. Moving forward, the DSAC will continue to review all proposed changes to the LDC and/or Code of Laws and Ordinances and provide comments and recommendations prior to review by the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for authorizing standalone GMPA and LDCA cycles, nor for placing in abeyance the discharge rates in the GMP. Costs associated with the text amendments will be accommodated in the current fiscal year budget. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: This item's Growth Management Plan(GMP) impact consists of placing in abeyance the discharge rates listed in the Stormwater Subelement. Text revisions to the GMP will be provided to the Board at a subsequent hearing for review and approval. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality, and requires majority vote for Board approval. --HFAC RECOMMENDATION: To approve a standalone Growth Management Plan amendment cycle to remove the existing maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin and modify, as needed, any GMP related references to those discharge rates for proper form and clarity; authorize placing in abeyance the discharge rates contained in the GMP; authorize staff to initiate amendments to the Code of Laws and Ordinances and/or Land Development Code (LDC) to add sixteen new maximum allowable off-site runoff discharge rates by basin; and,approve a standalone LDC amendment cycle,if needed Prepared by: Michele R. Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Division, Growth Management Department and David C. Weeks, AICP, Growth Management Manager,Zoning Division, Growth Management Department. Attachments: (1) Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates White Paper (2) Stormwater Management Sub-Element,Policy 6.3 (3) Code of Laws and ordinances, Section 90-41 This page intentionally left blank Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning,Impact Fees&Program Management Division Growth Management Department Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates March 23, 2016 Executive Summary Since 1990 (Ord. 90-10), Collier County has had Maximum Allowable Off-Site Stormwater Runoff Discharge Rates. In most areas of the County,the maximum allowable post development discharge rate is 0.15 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre. There have been six(6) exception areas - areas (sub-basins) with rates more restrictive ranging from 0.04 to 0.13 cfs per acre. These more restrictive rates were established based on modeling studies demonstrating the need to further restrict the runoff rate from adjacent lands based in limited conveyance capacity of the receiving canals. Between 2006 and 2011, three (3) studies were completed which included recommendations to reduce discharge rates in sixteen (16) additional sub-basin areas. In order to proceed with implementation of adding these 16 additional reduced discharge rates, Stormwater Planning initiated a vetting process including a feasibility analysis to examine all the effects that could result should some or all of the additional reduced discharge rates be implemented. This process began in May 2015. Since May 2015, staff has presented this issue to DSAC three (3) times on June 3, 2015, November 4, 2015, and March 2, 2016,with assistance from BCB/SFWMD staff and the Engineering Consulting firm of Robau &Associates, LLC (R&A). Many related issues have been discussed with DSAC. The following is a list of some key issues with staff comments. 1. Currently Built-Out Basins:Some of the areas where new restrictions are proposed are in basins that are principally built out. Why are you proposing implementation in these areas? Staff: Limited canal conveyance capacity is still relevant in these areas. Redevelopment potential is high in older built out areas. Opportunities to decrease runoff at the source will play a key role in ensuring adequate flood protection level of service (LOS). 2. Economic Analysis: What is the cost increase to developers that will result when adhering to more restrictive discharge rates? Staff: With DSAC's approval and understanding of the worst- case scenario - a high intensity commercial development, R&A completed a detailed analysis and presented it on March 2, 2016. The cost increase as analyzed was approximately 2%of the total site work. The additional cost is due to additional fill. 3. Affected Areas: Every basin should be checked. Staff: Detailed maps of each affected basin are being produced using high-level GIS analysis. These maps will show explicit basin boundaries and current land use with the potentially affected area (remaining undeveloped parcels) quantified by area (acres) and by percent of total basin area. 4. Incentives,Vested Rights,etc.: Other related land development regulations should be examined for possible changes that could offset this proposed higher regulatory standard. Staff: Issues such as redevelopment thresholds,vested future development rights(permitted but not Page 1 of 6 Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning,Impact Fees&Program Management Division Growth Management Department Co Coxxty yet built), Low Impact Development(LID) source control initiatives, relaxed parking lot drive aisle elevation requirements, berm side slopes, and buffers are some examples of incentives for consideration that will be examined during this vetting process. Our next step is to seek Board approval to begin the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and Land Development Code (LDC) amendment process. We anticipate going back to DSAC two (2) more times and to the CCPC three(3)times as part of the transmittal and adoption hearings. Staff is recommending removal of the discharge rates from the GMP with insertion into either the Code of Laws and Ordinances or the Land Development Code. Unfortunately, during the 2011 Ear-Based GMP Amendment Cycle which was originated to revise format, structure and language for internal consistency, additional restricted discharge rates as recommended by the Watershed Management Plan (WMP) were prematurely adopted by the BCC as part of the 2015 glitch amendments. Staff will bring an executive summary to the BCC on April 26, 2016 to request that the additional restricted discharge rates be placed in abeyance until the vetting process is complete. Our professional team working on the initiative consists of Jerry Kurtz, Ananta Nath, Robert Wiley, Michele Mosca, Liz Gosselin, Jin Xue, Joss De Lestang and Emilio Robau. Monthly County/BCB/SFWMD coordination meetings include regular progress updates on this issue insuring consistent understanding of regulatory application upon final approval and implementation. Background The following information includes an explanation of the history of the issue, the current need for the change, the areas that will be impacted should such an amendment be approved and the steps in the amendment process. 1.Surface Water Management and Maximum Allowable Discharge Rates The existing conveyance capacity of the County's primary and secondary stormwater and surface water management system is limited. Expansion or enlargement of this system to create additional system capacity is not a viable strategy for managing this issue. Previously completed analysis of the system's capacity to accept flow and adequately convey it to downstream receiving waters resulted in the current maximum allowable post development discharge rates. Subsequent and more recent analysis has been completed and the results indicate that sixteen (16) additional basins should have reduced maximum allowable post development discharge rates. Computer modeling results indicate that various segments of the system do not have the capacity to handle large storm events. In some cases,the canal banks are overtopped even during the 10-year design storm event. Conditions would worsen in the future unless management actions are implemented to control for the impact of subsequent changes to land use. Page 2 of 6 Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning,Impact Fees&Program Management Division Growth Management�� Department M Reducing maximum allowable post development discharge rates in these identified areas is one of the most prudent actions recommended to insure adequate flood protection levels of service. 2. Stormwater Management Discharge Rate Restriction History • 1974 — Ordinance 74-50 Establishes Collier County Water Management Policy and implements local design criteria. • 1982 — South Florida Water Management District establishes Pre-development verses Post- development matching discharge design criteria. • 1989 — Collier County adopted its first Growth Management Plan (Ord. 89-05) requiring the County to develop a Collier County Watershed Management Plan by 1993. • 1990—Ordinance 90-10 Established additional design criteria, and discharge limitations for four (4) basins including a 0.15 cfs/acre global restriction for the rest of Collier County. • 2001—Ordinance 01-27 further updated the allowable discharge rates, added two (2) additional basins, and other design criteria. • 2007 — DCA pushes Collier County to fulfill the 1989 Comprehensive plan commitments and County adopts interim watershed regulations through a Growth Management Plan Amendment (Ord. 07-16). 3. Basins with Specific Discharge Rates Currently there are a total of six (6) basins with specified reduced maximum allowable post development discharge rates ranging from 0.04 to 0.13 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre. In all other areas of the County the maximum allowable post development discharge rate is 0.15 cfs per acre. Discharge rates are computed using a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year return frequency. The current list of basins with specified maximum allowable post development discharge rates can be found in Policy 6.3 of Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP), Public Facilities Element, Drainage Sub- Element. This list can also be found in Ordinances 2001-27 and 2007-11, as well as on the County Stormwater Management web page. 4. Growth Management Code References The fourth paragraph of the introduction of the GMP, Public Facilities Element, Drainage Sub-Element, states that"the stormwater management system has to be designed so as to ensure that the final outlet point has adequate capacity to handle all discharges from the upstream portion of the watershed under conditions present at the time of design". Policy 1.2 of the GMP, Public Facilities Element, Drainage Sub-Element, states that procedures and projects will be designed and implemented in a manner to ensure that adequate stormwater management facility capacity is available at the time a development permit is issued or that such capacity will be available when needed to serve the development. Page 3 of 6 Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning,Impact Fees&Program Management Division Growth Management Department Cho ..._2cou y Goal 2, Objective 2.1., interim standard d, of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element states that limiting discharge rates will be reviewed as part of the Watershed Management Plans and modified accordingly to the analysis and findings of the plans. 5. Basis(Analysis)for Proposed Amendment Four (4) of the recommended maximum allowable post development discharge rates are based on two (2), 2006 completed stormwater management master plans, the Belle Meade Area Storm water Master Plan and the Immokalee Area Storm water Master Plan. The remainder of the recommended maximum allowable post development discharge rates are based on analysis completed as part of the Watershed Management Plan (2011). Belle Meade Area Stormwater Management Master Plan From page 4-21 of the Belle Meade Area Stormwater Management Master Plan, by Parsons Inc., dated September 2006, "The Belle Meade Basin allowable discharge rates were determined from the study's model results for the 25-year, 3-day design storm". The allowable discharge represents baseline conditions and is needed to maintain flood protection level of service when future land use modifications are proposed. In establishing an allowable discharge by watershed the Belle Meade model area was divided into two watersheds separated by Sabal Palm Road. The peak 25-Year, 3-day flow from the two watersheds will be divided by the total respective area to determine the allowable discharge. This method, approved by SFWMD personnel, is simple to administer and is consistent with the Environmental Resources Permit Information Manual (Volume IV, 2000) developed by SFWMD Environmental Resources Regulation Division. This method determines the allowable discharge for grouped sub basins and not by individual sub basins." Immokalee Area Stormwater Master Plan The limiting unit discharge rates of 0.05 and 0.10 cfs/acre respectively,for the areas east and west of State Road 29 in Immokalee were developed from the outputs of the Stormwater Management Model (XPSWMM) runs of the Immokalee Master Plan project. These rates, were however, not documented in the Master Plan report. The model results were subsequently reviewed and summarized by staff from the South Florida Water Management District Big Cypress Basin office after the report was published. The model inputs/outputs are available in SFWMD files and can be reviewed if further verification is needed. Watershed Management Plan The Watershed Management Plan (WMP) was accepted by the Board of County Commissioners on December 13, 2011. One of the efforts involved in completing the plan included a computer generated hydraulic conveyance analysis. MIKE SHE / MIKE 11 computer model results determined the maximum flow that can be conveyed by the various water management canal segments. Results indicated that various segments of the primary and secondary water management systems do not have the capacity to handle large storm events. As previously stated, in some cases, the canal banks are overtopped even Page 4 of 6 Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning,Impact Fees&Program Management Division Growth Management Department Co Couwy during the 10-year design storm event. Conditions would worsen in the future unless management actions are implemented to control for the impact of new development. A detailed description of the analysis is provided in the Surface Water Quantity Assessment section in Volume 4 of the WMP. To check the current allowed maximum discharges, as required by the County ordinance, the maximum flow predicted by the computer model was divided by the extent of the drainage area to obtain the actual maximum allowable discharge rate associated with each canal segment. It was found that maximum discharges for many of the County basins needed updating. That was expected because the original limits were based on preliminary analyses. Page 11 of Volume 3 of the WMP includes Table 3-3, a list of the recommended maximum allowable discharge rates for additional basins. Fourteen (14) basins are identified for recommended modification. Below are three clarifications in reference to this table. (1) Table 3-3 listed the Harvey Canal Basin twice, once as the Harvey Canal Basin and second as the Island Walk Basin. It is the same basin and the correct name is the Harvey Basin. Its discharge rate has been previously set based on the Harvey Basin Master Plan and is currently addressed in Ordinance 2001-27. No changes to this basin's rate are necessary. (2) Table 3-3 references the Henderson Creek Basin. This basin is the same as the Belle Meade Basin. The source for consideration of this basin's discharge rate modification will be the Belle Meade Stormwater Master Plan (BMSMP). The BMSMP split the basin into two parts using Sable Palm Road as the dividing line. (3) Table 3-3 indicates that no modification is recommended to the Upper Immokalee Basin. Modifications for the Immokalee area basins will be considered using the analysis completed by the Immokalee Area Stormwater Master Plan. This master plan split the basin in half using State Road 29 as the dividing line. 6.The Basins and Discharge Rates Current Six Specific Discharge Limitation Basins Rate 1. Airport Road North Sub-Basin 0.04 cfs/acre (North of Vanderbilt Beach Road) 2. Airport Road South Sub-basin 0.06 cfs/acre (South of Vanderbilt Beach Road) 3. Cocohatchee Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre 4. Lely Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre 5. Harvey Basin 0.055 cfs/acre(Recommend amending/rounding this off to 0.06 cfs/acre) 6. Wiggins Pass Basin 0.13 cfs/acre Page 5 of 6 Stormwater Management Capital Project Planning,Impact Fees&Program Management Division Growth Management Department Co Courery Proposed Additional Basins 1. Henderson Creek Belle Meade Basin (North 0.06 cfs/acre * of Sabal Palm Rd.) 2. Henderson Creek Belle Meade Basin (South of Sabal Palm Road) 0.04 cfs/acre *(Belle Meade MP recommended 0.0375 cfs/acre; recommending rounding to hundredths.) 3. Immokalee Master Plan Area (East of SR 29) 0.05 cfs/acre 4. Immokalee Master Plan Area (West of SR 29) 0.10 cfs/acre 5. CR 951 North Canal Basin 0.11 cfs/acre * 6. C4 Basin 0.11 cfs/acre 7. Corkscrew Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre* 8. Cypress Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre* 9. Faka Union Canal Basin (North of 1-75) 0.09 cfs/acre* 10. Gordon River Extension Basin 0.09 cfs/acre 11. 1-75 Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre * 12, Imperial Drainage Outlet Basin 0.12 cfs/acre 13. Lely Manor Canal Basin 0.06 cfs/acre 14. Main Golden Gate Canal Basin 0.04 cfs/acre * 15. Palm River Canal Basin 0.13 cfs/acre 16. Pine Ridge Canal Basin 0.13 cfs/acre *Basins with final outfall to SFWMD/BCB operated canals(8 of 16). 7. Benefits • Improved Levels of Service (LOS) for flood protection provided by South Florida Water Management District and Collier County operated canals • Enhanced Groundwater Recharge • Improved Hydrology and wetlands hydro-period • Reduce Pollution by Source Capture • Water Quality Improvement of receiving waters • Reduction of freshwater flows to the estuaries • Gain consistency in Environmental Resource Permitting(SFWMD and County) • Fulfill Growth Management Plan Commitments 8. Review and Approval Process Staff is proceeding with BCC approval to begin the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and Land Development Code (LDC) amendment process to remove the existing maximum allowable off-site discharge rates by basin from the GMP; adding the existing six discharge rates and sixteen (16) new discharge rates to the LDC. This process is anticipated to take up to a year and a half. Staff anticipates returning to DSAC two (2) more times with prepared amendments for transmittal and adoption hearings. Issues such as redevelopment thresholds,vested future development rights (permitted but not yet built), and possible incentives for consideration will be examined during this process. Attachments: March 2, 2016 DSAC Meeting PowerPoint Presentation Page 6 of 6 RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING COUNTY-INITIATED AMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, TO AMEND THE AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN OVERLAY WITHIN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO PROVIDE FOR AN AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.032(3) FLORIDA STATUTES; AND TO UPDATE AND CLARIFY TEXT AND CORRECT MAP ERRORS AND OMISSIONS SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB- ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT TO REMOVE THE DISCHARGE RATES; TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES; AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS TO - THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. [PL201300026371CPSP-2013-11] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Collier County staff has prepared amendments to the following elements of its Growth Management Plan: Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map; Stormwater Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; Transportation Element and Transportation Map Series; [15-CMP-00954] 317 Page 1 of 3 Batch#2 GMP Transmittal Amendments 10/24/16 Words underlined are additions; Words str-uek-threugh are deletions Capital Improvement Element and WHEREAS, on October 20, 2016, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed EAR-based amendments to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, Florida Statutes, and has recommended approval of said amendments to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing approved the transmittal of the proposed amendments to the Growth Management Plan to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty(30)days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty(180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS,the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3),F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA,that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendments, prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION adopted after motion, second and majority vote this day of , 2016. [15-CMP-00954] 317 Page 2 of 3 Batch#2 GMP Transmittal Amendments 10/24/16 Words underlined are additions; Words struo c-thr-eugh are deletions ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk DONNA FIALA, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko 0\ Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A—Text and Maps [15-CMP-00954]317 Page 3 of 3 Batch#2 GMP Transmittal Amendments 10/24/16 Words underlined are additions; Words struck-throes#are deletions Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT-BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13116 PL201300026371CPSP-2013-11 EXHIBIT "A" CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (CCME) Update and make current the Table of Contents, along with corresponding titles, heading and other entries- inside and between Elements-to maximize internal consistency. II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES GOAL 1: [Reference text only, page 3] TO PLAN FOR THE PROTECTION, CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT AND APPROPRIATE USE OF THE COUNTY'S NATURAL RESOURCES. OBJECTIVE 1.1: [Revised text, page 3] Maintain a comprehensive environmental management and conservation program to ensure that natural resources, including State and Federally listed animal species within the County are properly, appropriately, and effectively identified, managed, and protected. Policy 1.1.1: Collier County has established and will maintains an Environmental Advisory Council (EAC), which advises and assists the appropriate County agencies, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) in implementing the County's environmental resources management programs. Policy 1.1.2: Collier County has incorporated the gGoals,eObjectives and pPolicies of this Conservation and Coastal Management Element... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.3.1: [Revised text, page 4] The NRPA program shall direct incompatible land uses away from significant environmental systems that exist at a landscape scale, contain large systems of connected wetland and upland habitats, and support a wide variety of listed species. The program shall include the following: a. Identification and mapping of NRPAs as an overlay to the Future Land Use Map; (During the Assessment for the Rural Fringe area,the County has determined that CREW Trust lands, Belle Meade, and a portion of the Northern Belle Meade shall be identified as NRPAs. The County also has determined that the South Golden Gate Estates is a NPRA. The specific boundaries have been identified as NRPAs on the Future Land Use Map.) *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.3.2 [Revised text, page 5] The overall purpose and description of the Rural Stewardship program is defined in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) Overlay found in the in the Future Land Use Element. A Stewardship Credit system has been established that shall serve as the primary basis for the protection of Flowway Stewardship Areas (FSAs), Habitat Stewardship Areas (HSAs) and Water Retention Areas (WRAs). The RLSA Overlay also contains policies to that shall direct incompatible land uses away from FSAs, HSAs and WRAs in order to protect wetlands, upland habitats and listed species within the RLSA. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Page of La,'. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words a+riin4g„are deleted. 1 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113116 OBJECTIVE 2.1: [Revised text, page 6] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** a. All new development and re-development projects shall meet 150% of the water quality volumetric requirements of Section 4.2.1(a) of the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume 11 for use within the Geographic Limits of the South Florida Water Management District(2014), - - - , '• -. _ .. - - . . . . . , and the retention and detention requirements, and the allowable off-site discharge rates required—by - - - - ,,- -- •• • • -- - - '- - - •: . - provided in the Land Development Code; *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** d. All development located within areas identified on Figure 1 shall be evaluated to... avoid direct impacts to these natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs or, when not possible, to ensure any direct impact is minimized and compensated for by providing the same conveyance capacity lost by the direct impact. The County shall adhere to the limiting discharge rates of each basin -- - • a - - as -- - • _ - . --e . _ . . S _ - • _ Management Plans as provided in the Land Development Code. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 2.3.6.b: [Revised text, page 9] b. Excluding single family homes, any project impacting five (5) acres or more of wetlands shall provide... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 3.1.4: [Revised text, page 11] Wellhead protection areas identified on the Future Land Use Map Series shall be protected as follows: 1. Wellhead protection areas shall consist of four (4) Wellfield Risk Management Zones defined as follows: a) Zone W-1 is the land area surrounding the identified potable water wellfield wellheads and extends to the five percent 15%) ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the one 11)year ground water travel time to the wellfield). b) Zone W-2 is the land area between the W-1 boundary line and the ten percent(10%)ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the two year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). c) Zone W-3 is the land area between the W-2 boundary line and the twenty-five percent 125%) ground water capture zone boundary line(which approximates the five'` year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). d) Zone W-4 is the land area between the W-3 boundary line and the 4-00 one-hundred percent (100%) ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the twenty (20) year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). 2. Land uses are restricted within the wellfield risk management zones as follows: a) Future solid waste disposal facilities are prohibited in all wellfield risk management zones. b) Future solid waste transfer stations. are prohibited in zones W-1, -2, and W- a e _o ,' str DRAFT Words underlined are added;words r„ k-t;rugh are deleted. 2 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 c) Future solid waste storage, collection, and recycling storing hazardous products and hazardous wastes are prohibited in zones W-1, W-2, and W-3. d) Future non-residential uses involving hazardous products in quantities exceeding 250 liquid gallons or 1,000 pounds of solids must provide for absorption or secondary containment in zones W-1, W-2, and W-3. e) Future domestic wastewater treatment plants are prohibited in zone W-1. f) Future land disposal systems= must meet high level disinfection standards as found in Title 40 CFR part 135. g) Land application of domestic residuals: are required to limit metal concentrations; nitrogen based on uptake ability of vegetation), and require a Wellfield eConditional+Use. - -- -- ' - - - -1 4 - 4 h� Future on-site disposal systems (septic tanks) requiring a soil absorption area greater than 1,000 square feet are allowed to discharge in zone W-1 subject to complying with construction standards and provision of an automatic dosing device and a low-pressure lateral distribution. Oil On-site sewage disposal systems (septic tanks) serving existing industrial uses and subject to the thresholds in d) and e) above within wellfield zones W-1, W-2, and W-3 shall are required to meet all construction and operating standards contained in 64E-10, F.A.C. as the rule existed on August 31, 1999 and shall to implement a ground water monitoring plan. 3. Wellfield Conditional uses referenced within this pPolicy... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 3.3.2: [Revised text, page 13] Collier County shall use its three-dimensional computer model to calculate the actual "cones of depression" around the County's existing potable water wellfields. After at least 15 days publication of the maps of the proposed "zones of protection"for each such wellfield before each hearing by the EAC, Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners, the County shall then amend the appropriate elements of this Growth Management Plan to show such "cones of depression" as "zones of protection" within the Countywide Future Land Use Map Series. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 4.2: [Revised text, page 14] Continue to promote conservation of Collier County's potable water supply and will continue to develop, implement and refine a comprehensive conservation strategy through the Collier County Water-Sewer District and the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority, which identifies specific goals for reducing per capita potable water consumption. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 5.4: [Revised text, page 16] The Count,• Sha" m Maintain it's the County's program to control soil erosion through its regulations identifying criteria to control and reduce soil erosion and sediment transport from construction and other nonagricultural land disturbing activities. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Page 3 of DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stmak-thfough are deleted. 3 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 GOAL 6: [Reference text only, page 16] TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE THE COUNTY'S NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. OBJECTIVE 6.1: [Revised text, page 16] Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. (The Policies under this Objective shall apply to all of Collier County except for that portion of the County which is identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay.) Policy 6.1.1: For the County's Urban Designated Area... pursuant to pPolicies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element. ... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Revised text, page 17] (1) For the purpose of this pPolicy, ...specified in this pPolicy... (2) The preservation of... (3) Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of this pPolicy shall be set aside... consistent with the requirements of this pPolicy. (4) Selection of native vegetation to be... a. Wetland or upland areas... the requirements of Policy 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 of this eElement. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Revised text, page 18] (5) The uses allowable within preserve areas are limited to: a. ...standards that implement this pPolicy shall be... b. ...according to the pPolicies associated with Objective 7.1. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.1.2: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Revised text, page 22] (1) For the purpose of this pPolicy... specified in this pPolicy... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Revised text, page 22] (3) Areas that fulfill ...the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of this pPolicy... consistent with ...the requirements of this pPolicy. ... (4) a. ...the requirements of Policy 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 of this eElement. (5) b. ...according to the pPolicies associated with Objective 7.1... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Revised text, page 23] (8) ...required in this pPolicy... (10) ...pursuant to Policy 6.5.2 of this eElement. ...in GGME Objective 6.5 of this eElement. Page - of= DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck tEh are deleted. 4 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13116 *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.1.5: [Revised text, page 24] ...in Policies 6.1.1, and 6.1.2 of this eElement... ...the requirements of Policy 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 of this eElement... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.1.9: [Revised text, page 25] ...the pPolicies supporting Objective 6.1. OBJECTIVE 6.2: ...the appropriate pPolicies under Goal 6. (The County's wetland protection policies and strategies shall-be are coordinated with the Watershed Management Plans as required by Objective 2.1 of this Element.) *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.2.5: [Revised text, page 29] ...of Policy 6.1.2 of this eElement... This pPolicy shall be implemented... (1) ...of Policy 6.1.2 of this eElement... a. The acreage requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this eElement shall be met telly preserving... ...in paragraph (2) of this pPolicy. ...This pPolicy is... ...by Policy 6.1.2 of this eElement. ...by Policy 6.1.2 of this eElement. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** (3) ...of paragraph (6) of this pPolicy. (4) ...within Policy 6.2.7 of this eElement. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Revised text, page 31] (6)a.4. ...with paragraphs (6)a.1, (6)a.2, and (6)a.3 of this pPolicy ...with this pPolicy... (6)a.5. ...the requirements of Policy 6.2.7 of this eElement. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.2.6 [Revised text, page 31] ...in Policy 6.2.5(5)d of this eElement... Policy 6.2.7: [Revised text, page 32] ...This pPolicy shall be implemented as follows: (2) ...pursuant to pPolicies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element... (3) ...pursuant to pPolicies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.2.9: [Revised text, page 33] ...the pPolicies supporting Objective 6.2. OBJECTIVE 6.3: [Revised text, page 33] Protect and conserve submerged marine habitats. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Page 5 ,of ' DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck are deleted. 5 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 OBJECTIVE 6.4: [Revised text, page 33] The--Com-p Protect, conserve and appropriately use ecological communities shared with or tangential to State and Federal lands and other local governments. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 6.5: [Revised text, page 33] The County shall p Protect natural reservations from the impact of surrounding development. For the purpose of this Objective and its related pPolicies:, natural reservations shall include only Natural Resource Protection Areas(NRPAs)and designated Conservation Lands on the Future Land Use Map„ and, development shall Such development includes all projects except for permitting and construction of single-family dwelling units situated on individual lots or parcels. This Objective and its Policies:hall apply only to the Rural Fringe Mixed Use dDistrict [except as noted in Policy 6.5.3 below]. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.5.2: [Revised text, page 34] The following criteria shall apply to development contiguous to natural reservations in order to reduce negative impacts to the natural reservations: (1) d. ...in Policy 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 of this eElement. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** (3) Within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, ...as specified in Section 4.2.2(b), of the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume If for use within the Geographic Limits of the South Florida Water Management District(2014), or its successor. (4) Proposed development ...projects shall be designed in accordance with Sections 3.10, 10.2.2.4 of the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume I, and Sections 3.11 and 3.12 of the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume Il for use within the Geographic Limits of the South Florida Water Management District(2014), or its successor. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** GOAL 7: TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE THE COUNTY'S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. OBJECTIVE 7.1: [Reference text only, page 36] Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats... Policy 7.1.1: [Revised text, page 36] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** (6) All other pPolicies supporting Objective 7.1 of this eElement. Policy 7.1.2: [Revised text, page 37] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** (2) Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species and for those protected species identified below shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated indicates listed species or the protected species identified below are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Management plans for new preserves shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain habitat within the preserve for listed species and those protected species identified below. Page � of IT' DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted. 6 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 (a) Management plans for new preserves shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species and those protected species identified below, and their habitat from the negative impacts of proposed development. Developments shall be clustered to discourage impacts to listed species habitats. Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or. other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses, and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** (2)(a)2. ...subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this pPolicy. 3. ...contained in Policy 6.1.1 and Policy 6.1.2 of this eElement. The County shall also consider the recommendations of other agencies, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this pPolicy. (b) For parcels containing gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), priority shall be given habitat management plans are required and shall give priority to protecting the largest most contiguous gopher tortoise habitat with the greatest number of active burrows, and for providing a connection to off site adjacent gopher tortoise preserves. (c) Habitat preservation plans for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens)are required and shall - • - •• - • - _ - • • - . - _ - -_ _. - - - - e”--"e-, •• - -• provide for a maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. -- - - • . . . .- .. . .. . . . . _ _ - - • - • ..- • - • - _ . • pin_the sn b vegetati • - - �urrr-ther�.ac{�}o �c�cscn-rvrr. (d) For the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), the the-require4 habitat management plans are required and shall establish protective zones around the eagle nest restricting certain activities. The plans shall also address restricting certain types of activities during the nesting season. - - - _ • ' - • - _ 3, _ _ _- •- - - S •.. . (e) For the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the eq iced habitat protection plans are required and shall outline measures to avoid adverse impacts to active clusters and to minimize impacts to foraging habitat. Where adverse effects cannot be avoided, measures shall be taken to minimize on-site disturbance and compensate or mitigate for impacts that remain. --_ .' •• - _ _ -- _ - -2- _ - (f) In areas where the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) may be present, the management plans are required and shall require that garbage be placed in beaf-pfeef containers, at o• - - •-- - • - . _- bear-resistant containers where such containers are available and accepted for use by Collier County, or containers stored in locations not easily accessible to bears. The management plan shall also identify methods to inform local residents of the concerns related to interaction between black bears and humans. (g) For projects located in Priority I and Priority Il Panther Habitat areas, the management plans are required and shall discourage the destruction of undisturbed, native habitats that are preferred by the Florida panther (Fells concolor coryi) by directing intensive land uses to currently disturbed areas. Preferred habitats include pine flatwoods and hardwood hammocks. In turn, these areas shall be buffered from the most intense fland uses` of the Page DRAFT Words underlined are added words struck through are deleted. — -7 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 project by using low intensity land uses (e.g., parks, passive recreational areas, golf courses). Golf courses within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District shall be designed and managed using standards found in that district. The management plans shall identify appropriate lighting controls for these permitted uses and shall also address the opportunity to utilize prescribed burning to maintain fire-adapted preserved vegetative communities and provide browse for white-tailed deer. • - - ' - . _ - a paragraph (3) of this policy. (h) In order to protect loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and other listed sea turtles that nest along Collier County beaches, projects within 300 feet of the MHW line shall limit outdoor lighting to that necessary for security and safety, Floodlights and landscape or accent lighting shall be prohibited. - - . , -•-- _ _ - -e. • *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 7.2.2: [Revised text, page 40] ...of Policies 6.3.1, 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 of this eElement. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 10.1: [Revised text, page 43] riorities-fer Give priority to water dependent shoreline land uses •-uses over water related shoreline land uses, ana sha„-be based on type of water-dependent use, adjacent land use, and surrounding marine and upland habitat considerations. ... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 10.1.6: [Revised text, page 44] proposed development within the "Special Treatment" ("ST")Zoning Overlay District. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 10.3: [Reference text only, page 45] Maintain undeveloped coastal barriers, mapped as part of the Federal Coastal Barrier Resources System, predominantly in their natural state and protect, maintain and enhance their natural function. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 10.3.15: [Revised text, page 46] - County's existing "Special Treatment" CST") zoning overlay district. Objective 10.3 and its Development on undeveloped coastal barrier islands within the Special Treatment" ("ST") zoning overlay district shall be reviewed through criteria established in the land development regulations. Applicable Policies under Goal 10 will be used in developing such criteria. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 10.4.3: [Revised text, page 47] ...Implementation of this pPolicy will be... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 10.5: [Revised text, page 48] DRAFT Words underlined are added;words StPcidi-thfetliji4 are deleterLS ofIT 8 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 For undeveloped chores Provide improved opportunities for recreational, educational, scientific, and aesthetic enjoyment of coastal resources for undeveloped shorelines: Th'c shall {tea accompli hed by protecting beaches and dunes and by... Policy 10.5.1: Passive Rrecreation that is compatible with the natural functions of beaches and dunes is shall be regarded as the highest and best land use. Policy 10.5.2: The County shall pgrioritize acquisition efforts in order to meet the projected need for additional public beaches. Policy 10.5.3: The County shall pRrohibit activities which would result in man induced shoreline erosion beyond the natural beach erosion cycle or that would deteriorate the beach dune system. Policy 10.5.4: The County may pRrohibit construction of any structure seaward of the Coastal Construction Setback Line. Exceptions shall be allowed for passive recreational structures, access crossovers, and where enforcement would not allow any reasonable economic utilization of such property. In the latter event, require construction that shall minimizes interference with natural functions of such beaches and dunes. *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 10.5.6: [Revised text, page 49] The County shall rRegulate activities so that they will not threaten the stability of the dunes or the beach itself. Policy 10.5.7: The County shall pRursue the acquisition of undeveloped beaches and dunes as the first alternative to development. Policy 10.5.8: The County shall pRrohibit shoreline armoring processes and encourage non-structural methods for stabilizing beaches and dunes. Policy 10.5.9: The County shall pRrohibit construction seaward of the Coastal Construction Setback Line except as follows: a. Construction will be allowed for public access; b. For protection and restoration of beach resources; c. In cases of demonstrated land use related hardship or safety concerns as specified in The 1985 Florida Coastal Zone Protection Act, there shall be no shore armoring allowed except in cases of public safety. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 10.5.12: [Revised text, page 49] For-alb Beach front land development related projects shall require dune stabilization and restoration improvements, the removal of exotic vegetation, and replacement with native vegetation, as appropriate. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words Staid—through are deleted. Page_.L..—of 21..' 9 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 Policy 10.6.1: [Revised text, page 50] ...applicable pPolicies supporting Objectives 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, and 10.5 above... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Revised text, page 50] 6. The requirements of this pPolicy... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 11.1.1: [Revised text, page 50] Regulations regarding development and other land alteration activities that shall continue to ensure the conservation, sensitive re-use, preservation of significant historic and archaeological resources, or appropriate mitigation in accordance with State standards. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 12.1: [Revised text, page 51] Maintain hurricane evacuation clearance times as required by state law. An evacuation clearance time shall-be is defined as having residents and visitors in an appropriate refuge away from storm surge prior to the arrival of sustained Tropical Storm force winds, i.e., winds equal to or greater than 39 mph. To further this ()Objective, for future mobile home developments located outside of the storm surge zone, such development()hal,is to include on-site sheltering or retro-fitting of an adjacent facility. The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services shall continues to seek opportunities to increase shelter facilities and associated capacities under the direction of the Department of the Florida Division of Emergency Management. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 12.1.4: [Revised text, page 52] The County shall continue-te maintain hurricane shelter requirements and standards for all new mobile home parks and mobile home subdivisions, or existing mobile home parks and mobile home subdivisions in the process of expanding, which accommodate or contain twenty-six (26)units or more. Such mobile home parks or mobile home subdivisions shall be required to provide emergency shelter space on-site, or to provide funding to enhance one or more existing public shelters off-site. The building which provides the on-site shelter space (if this option is chosen) will be of such a size as to provide shelter to park or subdivision residents at the rate of twenty (20) square feet per person. For the purposes of this pPolicy, the size of the on-site shelter structure shall be determined by estimating the park or subdivision population during the June-November time frame, based upon methodologies utilized by the Collier County ••- . - - •- -• !-_. - ..-- Bureau of Emergency Services. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 12.1.8: [Revised text, page 53] The County's land development regulations shall include mitigation policies addressing flood plains, beach and dune alteration and storm water management. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Page...4_of DRAFT' Words underlined are added;words struck-through are deleted. 10 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CONSERVATION&COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 Policy 12.1.14: [Revised text, page 53] All new nursing homes and assisted living facilities that are licensed shall have a core area to shelter residents and staff on site. The core area will be constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria that is required for new public schools and public community colleges and universities ("State Requirements for Educational Facilities," 2007 2014). Additionally, this area shall be capable of ventilation or air conditioning provided by back-up generator for a period of no less than seventy-two .(72) hours. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 12.2: [Revised text, page 54] Ensure that publicly funded buildings and publicly funded development activities are carried out in a manner that demonstrates best practice to minimize the loss of life, property, and re-building cost from the affects from hurricanes, flooding, natural and technological disaster events. Best practice efforts may include, but are not limited to: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 12.3.1: [Revised text, page 55] The Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan shall comply with the pPolicies under this eOb]ective, and shall contain step-by-step details for post disaster recovery. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 12.3.3: [Revised text, page 55] The Recovery Task Force shall include the Sheriff, the Growth Management Department Head, the Land Development Se vices Zoning Director, the Bureau of Emergency Services Director and other members as directed by the Board of County Commissioners, such as representatives from municipalities within the County that have received damage from a storm. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 12.4: [Revised text, page 56] Make every reasonable effort to meet the emergency preparedness requirements of Persons with Special Needs such as the elderly, handicapped, the infirmed and those requiring transportation from a threatened area. In the event of a countywide emergency, such as a hurricane or other large-scale disaster, the County Bureau of Emergency Services, in coordination with the County Health Department and other officials., shall opens and operates one or more refuges for persons listed on the County's Special Needs Registry and their caregivers. Medical and support equipment at such refuges will include, but are not necefarily be limited to, respirators, oxygen tanks, first aid equipment, disaster cots and blankets, and defibrillators. PLEASE NOTE: Approval of amendments to this Element is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other _formal terms where reformatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear—within and between Elements—as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document. Page l i ,of DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck-through are deleted. 1 1 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 EXHIBIT "A" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT (CIE) Update and make current the Table of Contents, along with corresponding titles, heading and other entries- inside and between Elements- to maximize internal consistency Policy 1.1: [Revised text, page 2] The County shall establish standards for levels of service (LOS) for public facilities, as follows: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.5: The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** D. County Potable Water Systems: [Revised text, page 6] County Water District=--7-0 150 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) E. County Sanitary Sewer-Wastewater Treatment Systems: [Revised text, page 7] North Sewer Wastewater Treatment Service Area = 120 100 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) South Wastewater Treatment Service Area = 100 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) r *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 4.1: [Revised text, page 10] The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be reviewed and updated annually as follows: A. - .._ may be amended two times during any calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies, BPursuant to Florida Statutes, 163.3177, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted modified by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for Policy 4.2: [Revised text, page 10] By December 1 of each year, tThe County shall adopt, by reference, into its Capital Improvement Element,the School District's annually updated financially feasible Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the District Facilities Work Program in order to achieve and maintain the adopted level of service standards for Public School Facilities. The School District Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan shall identify identifies the financially feasible school facility capacity projects necessary to address existing deficiencies and future needs based on achieving and maintaining adopted LOS standards for schools. The District Facilities Work Program, prepared by the School District pursuant to Section 1013.35(1)(b), F.S., shall-be is adopted as part of the data and analysis in support of the School District's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. Adoption by the County, of the School District's Capital Improvement Plan .-. and the District Facilities Work Program shall occur, without requiring separate action,.with approval of the District School Board annual update to the Schedule of Capital Improvements of this of-Gallie& DRAFT Words underlined are added;wordsthrough are deleted. 1 Page JAL of - Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 -- - - - • - Element. FY 15 31, approved on May 13, 2014; and, the District - _ - - - ' _ •- - -- "-- - - - - ', . n *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 5: (CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT) [Revised text, page 12] Ensure that public facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development through a Concurrency Management System. Policy 5.871: [Renumbered text only, page 12] Policy 5.8&2: [Renumbered text only, page 12] Policy 5.4 3: [Renumbered text only, page 12] Policy 5.2 4: [Renumbered text only, page 12] A. Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policy 54 5_3 A, B and C is met; or Policy 5.3 5: [Renumbered text only, page 13] Policy 5.4 6: [Renumbered text only, page 13] Policy 5.5 7: [Renumbered text only, page 14] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 5.2 4: [Revised text, page 12] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** A. Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policy 54 5.33 A, B and C is met; or *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 5.3 5: [Revised text, page 13] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** D. The necessary facilities and services are under construction or under contract pursuant to a FOOT 5-Year Work Program and are consistent with the Collier County ao46 2040 Long Range Needs Plan or the 28.38 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan(LRTP), as adopted by the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO); or *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Footnotes [Revised text, page 23] These footnotes provide brief explanations of revenue sources and their acronyms found in the Schedule of Capital Improvements, and where to find related supporting data & analysis. 1. Note: Impact Fee (IF) revenues are projected from actual historical revenue and current permitting activity and forecasts. Impact fees and other sources may yield Interest (IN) revenues. Refer to Appendix "I". Certain impact fees are referenced with direct connection to facility type, such as Water Impact Fees (WIF) or Sewer Wastewater Impact Fees (SIF) and may be termed System Development fees. Water and sewer impact fees are also projected based on population projections prepared by the Comprehensive Planning Deft Section. Deferred Impact Fees (DIF) may generate revenue. 2. Note: Grant and Reimbursement (GR) revenues are based on project-specific funding agreements with the State of Florida, South Florida Water Management District or other agency. Refer to Appendix "I". DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stRisk-through are deleted. 2 Page. .of_la Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 3. Note: Developer Contribution Agreement (DCA) or advanced reimbursement revenues are based r1 on a project-specific agreement with an active developer doing business in Collier County. 4. Note: Certificate of Adequacy (COA) revenues are projected from historical revenue information, 5. Note: Gas Tax (GA) revenues are projected from historical revenue information. Gas taxes may yield Interest (IN) revenues. Refer to Appendix "P. 6. Note: Ave Maria (AV) revenues are based on a project-specific Developer Contribution Agreement (DCA)with Ave Maria Development, LLP. Refer to Appendix "I". 7. Note: Carry Forward (CF) Available Cash (AC) (also known as Carry Forward or Beginning Cash) revenues are based on a combination of encumbered and unencumbered funds from prior years that will continue to rollover until they are spent on protects or payment of debt service. 8. Note: Transfer (TR) revenue is money coming in from another fund, and is projected from historical information. Value may be added through commitments and leases. Refer to Appendix "1" 9. Note: General Fund (GF)revenues are projected from historical revenue information. General Fund (001) revenues derive principally from ad valorem taxes levied on properties Countywide, intergovernmental revenues (i.e., Sales Tax and Revenue Sharing), charges for services, interest, and transfers from other funds and Constitutional Officers. MSTU General Fund — Unincorporated Areas Fund (111) revenues derive principally from ad valorem taxes levied on properties in the unincorporated areas of the County, intergovernmental revenues (i.e., Communications Tax), charges for services, interest, and transfers from other funds. Refer to Appendix "I" 10. Note: Revenue Resefve Reduction (RR) revenues are based on a percentage of total new revenue,, as required by law, Chapter 129, Florida Statutes. Refer to Appendix '7" 11. Note: Revenue Bond Financing (B) or Bond Proceeds (revenue) are usually received as a lump sum but occasionally can be received in installments, and are not based on historical revenues. In some instances, this item is actually shown as an expense for bond debt service payments, and in other instances, this item shows bond revenue proceeds. Revenue bond covenants and commercial paper documentation are voluminous and do not appear in support documents. The pertinent information is however provided in the Consulting Engineering and Financial Feasibility Report, dated October 25, 2006, and appears in Appendix `7" 12. Note: Capital Account (CA) revenues are projected based on the capital projects spending needs. Refer to Appendix "I". Certain capital accounts are referenced with direct connection to facility type, such as Water Capital Accounts (WCA) and ;Sewer Wastewater Capital Accounts (SCA). 13. Note: User Fee (UF)revenues are projected from historical revenue information. Refer to Appendix "/" Certain user fees are referenced with direct connection to the user under contract, such as Landfill Tipping Fees (LTF). 14. Note: Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) or Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) revenues are projected from historical revenue information. 15. Note: State Revolving Fund Loan (SRF) revenues are received in installments during the course of a project. Refer to Appendix "I" 16. Note: Commercial Paper (LOC) or local financial institution loan revenue is short-term borrowing usually meant for funding projects underway until such time another funding source is received. These revenues may derived from obligated return on additional senior liens. Commercial paper documentation and revenue bond covenants are voluminous and do not appear in support documents. The pertinent information is however provided in the Consulting Engineering and Financial Feasibility Report, dated October 25, 2006, and appears in Appendix `7" DRAFT Words underlined are added;words st ue4-ttireagh are deleted. 3 Page (4 of IR Staff Proposed GMP Amendments CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 17. Note: Rate Revenue (REV) revenues are based on historical revenue information combined with the projection of volume change and revenue requirement projections. Refer to Appendix "I" 18. Note: Additional Roll Forward (ARF) revenues are cash reserves intended for, but previously unspent on, future projects or payment of debt service. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** V. PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION [Revised text, page 26] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 6.C. ... the requirements of Policies 5.4 3, 5.3 4, 5.3 5 and 5.4 6 of this Element. PLEASE NOTE: Approval of amendments to this Element is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear—within and between Elements—as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document, DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck4hreugh are deleted. 4 Page 16- of, Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 PL20130002637/C PS P-2013-11 EXHIBIT "A" FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) Update and make current the Table of contents, along with corresponding titles, heading and other entries—inside and between Elements—to optimize internal consistency. FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES [Revised text, Table of Contents page iv] Future Land Use Map Mixed Use & Interchange Activity Centers Maps Properties Consistent by Policy (5.9, 5.10, 5.11, 5.12, 5.13, 5.14) Maps [Reference text, page 10] GOAL: TO GUIDE LAND USE DECISION-MAKING SO AS TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN A HIGH QUALITY NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WITH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH PROMOTE THE PUBLIC'S HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE CONSISTENT WITH STATE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS AND LOCAL DESIRES. OBJECTIVE 1: [Revised text, page 10] Promote well planned land uses consistent with Future Land Use Designations, Districts and Subdistricts and the Future Land Use Map to ensure compatibility between the natural and human environments. Policy 1.1: Unless otherwise permitted in this Growth Management Plan, new or revised uses of land shall be consistent with designations outlined on the Future Land Use Map. Policy 1.2: The Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts and Subdistricts shall be binding on all Development Orders effective with the adoption of this Growth Management Plan. Policy 1.3: Standards and permitted uses for each Future Land Use District and Subdistrict shall be identified in the Designation Description Section. Policy 1.4: Through the magnitude, location and configuration of its components, the Future Land Use Map shall be designed to coordinate land use with the natural environment including topography, soil and other resources; promote a sound economy; coordinate coastal population densities with the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Plan; and discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words are deleted. Page /6. of _ Staff Proposed OMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 Policy 1.1 through Policy 1.5 renumbered as Policy 1.5 through Policy 1.9. All references to Policies 1.1 through Policy 1.5 in this Element or in another Element or Sub-Element of the GMP are renumbered -- accordingly. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 2: [Revised text, page 12] Coordinate land uses with the availability of public facilities shall--bet accomplished through the Concurrency Management System of the Capital Improvement Element and implemented through the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance of the Land Development Code. Policy 2.1: The County shall maintain the Concurrency Management System in the Capital Improvement Element by implementation of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance in the Land Development Code. Policy 2.1 through Policy 2.6 renumbered as Policy 2.2 through Policy 2.7. All references to Policies 2.1 through Policy 2.6 in this Element or in another Element or Sub-Element of the GMP are renumbered accordingly. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 2.2 3 [Renumbered only, page 12] Deficiencies or potential deficiencies that have been determined through the Annual Update and Inventory Report on capital public facilities may include the following remedial actions: establish an area of significant influence for roads, a TCEA, TCMA, add projects to the Capital Improvement Element, enter into a binding commitment with a Developer to construct the needed facilities or defer development until improvements can be made or the level of service is amended to ensure available capacity. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 2.5 6: [Revised text, page 12] The County has designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMA) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that provides multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in Politic; 1.3 and 1.4 of the Transpeftatien Capital Improvement Element. Standards within TCMAs are provided in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element. New Development within each TCMA shall be consistent with the criteria set forth in Objective 6, and its supporting Policies 6.1 through 64 6_7 of this Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are hereby designated: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 3: [Revised text, page 13] - - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ensure protection of natural and historicresources, ensure the availability of land for utility facilities, promote compatible land uses within the airport noise zone, and fe provide for management of growthin art efficient and effective manner through Land Development Regulations adopted to implement this Growth Management Plan. Policy 3.1: Land Development Regulations shall be adopted, as necessary, to implement this Growth Management Plan pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, Florida Statutes. Policy 3.1 and Policy 3.2 renumbered as Policy 3.2 and Policy 3.3. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stFuek-thfouffh are de ed. 2 rage j 7 or Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 Policy 3.2.j. ...consistency with one or more of Policies 6:9 5.11 through 5.15. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 4: [Revised text, page 15] Continually refine the Future Land Use Element through detailed planning in 40 order to improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development, #housing and urban design, • - _ - -: - • . • _ -. - _ . Policy 4.1: Planning studies may address specific geographic or issue areas. Policy 4.1 through Policy 4.10 renumbered as Policy 4.2 through Policy 4.11. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 5: [Revised text, page 17] Implement land use policies that in-e a promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element, Policy 5.1: Land use policies supporting Objective 5 shall be implemented upon the adoption of the Growth Management Plan. Policy 5.2: Land use policies supporting Objective 5 shall continue to be implemented upon the adoption of amendments to the Growth Management Plan. Policy 5.1 through Policy 5.14 renumbered as Policy 5.3 through Policy 5.16. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 5.4012: [Revised text, page 19] The zoning on property for which an exemption has been granted based on... this pPolicy shall exempt any development from... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 6: [Revised text, page 22] Designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) ace as geographically compact areas :- -_ - :_. : : - ••• - • • - : . •_ where intensive development exists, or such development is planned. TCMAs are supported by tF Tollowing Policies. Policy 2.5 of this Element. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words sts161014Feugh are deleted. Page 16 of.2L 3 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 Policy 6.1: New development within a TCMA shall occur in a manner that will ensure an adequate level of mobility (as defined in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element) and further the achievement of the following identified important state planning goals and policies: discouraging the proliferation of urban sprawl, protecting natural resources, protecting historic resources, maximizing the efficient use of existing public facilities, and promoting public transit bicycling, walking and other alternatives to the single occupant automobile. Policy 6.2: Trans•ortation Concurrenc Management Areas have been established -i• i. •- •_*site. in the specific geographic areas described in Policy 2.6 of this Element. Policy 6.1 through Policy 6.5 renumbered as Policy 6.3 through Policy 6.7. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 7: [Revised text, page 24] — - - • — -- • - .e-, :Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier the County, the-follewiagi-policies . :- •.. . 7.••:• _ . . - .. ..- - -. - e _ . .. - - • - . , where applicable.-, in support of the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, as follows: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 7.5: [Revised text, page 24] The County shall encourage mixed-use development within the same buildings by allowing residential dwelling units over and/or abutting commercial development. This pPolicy shall be implemented through provisions in specific sSubdistricts in this Growth Management Plan. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** I. URBAN DESIGNATION A. Urban Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict: [Revised text, page 34] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** g. For freestanding residential uses, acreage to be... allowed by FLUE, Policy 5_3. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict: [Revised text, page 42] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. Residential density is... limited to four f.41 dwelling units per acre; density in excess of three a)dwelling units per acre must be... For property not within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict and not within the Coastal High Hazard Area, density shall be limited to sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre; density in excess of three a) dwelling units per acre and up to eleven (11_) dwelling units... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struslk-th augh are deleted. page'p f 119 4 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113116 I. URBAN DESIGNATION A. Urban Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict: [Revised text, page 43] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** To encourage mixed-use projects, this Subdistrict also permits residential development, when Ulocated in a mixed-use building (residential uses over commercial uses). Such residential development is allowed at a maximum density of sixteen (16)dwelling units... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** I. URBAN DESIGNATION A. Urban Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 15.Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict [Revised text, page 43] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** This Subdistrict consists of two parcels... For mixed-use development, residential density shall be limited to sixteen (16.)dwelling units per acre. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** I. URBAN DESIGNATION B. DENSITY RATING SYSTEM 1. The Density Rating System is applied in the following manner: [Revised text, page 50] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** e. All new residential zoning located within Districts, Subdistricts and Overlays identified above that are subject to this Density Rating System shall be consistent with this Density Rating System, except as provided in: 1) Policy 64 5_3 of the Future Land Use Element. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 2. Density Bonuses: [Revised text, page 51] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** c. Affordable-Workforce Housing Bonus: ...in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to eight(8)residential units... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 4. Density Conditions: [Revised text, page 53] The following density condition applies to all properties subject to the Density Rating System. a. Maximum Density The maximum allowed density shall not exceed sixteen (16)dwelling units... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 5. Density Blending [Revised text, page 54] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words&troch-through are deleted, Page 20 of Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 2. Density Blending Conditions and Limitations for Properties Straddling the Urban Residential Fringe Sub-District and Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending lands: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** (f) Native vegetation shall be preserved as follows: (1) The Urban portion of... the maximum required 60 sixty percent (60%)of the total Sending Land area... The ratio for such native vegetation preservation shall be two Lal acres of... In no instance shall less than 40 ten percent (10%) of the required amount of native vegetation... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** I. URBAN DESIGNATION C. Urban Commercial District 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict [Revised text, page 57] Mixed Use Activity Centers have been designated on the Future Land Use Map Series identified in the Future Land Use Element. ...this includes 3 three Interchange Activity Centers... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Mixed-use developments —whether consisting of... the eligible density is sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre. If such a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center... the eligible density shall be limited to four dwelling units per acre... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** The factors to consider during review of a rezone petition for a project, or portion thereof, within an Activity Center, are as follows: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** b. The amount, type and location of existing zoned commercial land, and developed commercial uses, both within the Mixed Use Activity Center and within two road miles of the Mixed Use Activity Center. c. Market demand and service area for the proposed commercial land uses to be used as a guide to explore the feasibility of the requested land uses. d. Existing patterns of land use within the Mixed Use Activity Center and within two j) radial miles. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Revised text, page 61] New Mixed Use Activity Centers may be proposed if all of the following criteria are met and an amendment is made to delineate the specific boundaries on the Future Land Use Map series for Mixed Use Activity Centers: • the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center is located consists of an arterial and collector road, or two arterial roads, based upon roadway classifications contained in the Transportation Element. • the Mixed Use Activity Center is no closer than two Lai miles from any existing Mixed Use Activity Center, as measured from the center point of the intersections around which the existing and proposed Mixed Use Activity Centers are located. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words ste-ttr-eugh are deleted. 6 Page ,.t of ja Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 I. URBAN DESIGNATION C. Urban Commercial District 6. Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict [Revised text, page 64] This Subdistrict consists of... The maximum allowed development intensities include 91,000 square feet of professional or medical office use in buildings containing a maximum height of thirty-five (351 feet, or 200,000 square feet of indoor self-storage area in buildings containing a maximum of three L1 stories and at a maximum height of fifty(501 feet. Should a mix of office and indoor self-storage facilities develop on the property, for each twoal square feet of indoor self-storage area, one al square foot of office area shall be reduced from the maximum allowable office area permitted. ... *** *** *** *** * text break *** *** *** *** *** I. URBAN DESIGNATION C. Urban Commercial District 7. Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict [Revised text, page 64] This Subdistrict consists of... The maximum allowed development intensities include a maximum of 52,500 square feet of professional or medical office use in buildings containing a maximum of three 111 stories, which could include two stories over parking, and at a maximum height of fifty (501 feet. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** II. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** B. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District 1. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), and Sending, Neutral, and Receiving Designations: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** A) Receiving Lands: [Revised text, page 74] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 4. Emergency Preparedness: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** b) Applicants for new developments proposed for Receiving Lands shall work with the .. . - • e e - • - • - - - - - •- - •••- - •, Florida Forest Service and the Managers of any adjacent or nearby public lands, to develop a Wildfire Prevention and Mitigation Plan that will reduce the likelihood of threat to life and property from wildfires. This plan will address, at a minimum: project structural design; the use of materials and location of structures so as to reduce wildfire threat; firebreaks and buffers;water features; and, the impacts of prescribed burning on adjacent or nearby lands. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** II. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words s#askktf;reugh are deleted. 7 Page of Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 B. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District 1. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), and Sending, Neutral, and Receiving Designations: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** C) Sending Lands: [Revised text, page 82] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 6. Early Entry TDR Bonus: An Early Entry TDR Bonus shall be available in the form of an additional one TDR Credit for each base TDR Credit severed from Sending Lands from March 5, 2004, _ • - _ _ . ._ _ • -. - - • - _ - -- _ _ • _ - - - - - • of until September 27, 2015 2018. Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits may be used after the termination of the bonus period. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** II. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** B. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District *** *4* *** *** *** text break *4* *** *4* *** *** 3. Rural Villages: [Revised text, page 86] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** A) Process for Approval: • • _ • _ .. _ _ e- _ _ _ __ _ _ • _ _ • • • - The Collier County Land Development Code includes provisions for the establishment of Rural Villages. These provisions will establish specific development -- regulations, standards, and land use mix requirements. Subsequent to the creation of these provisions, applications shall be submitted in the form of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezone and, where applicable, in conjunction with a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) application as provided for in Chapter 380 of Florida Statutes, or in conjunction with any other Florida provisions of law that may supersede the DRI process. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *4* *** IiI. ESTATES DESIGNATION [Revised text, page 92] The Estates Land Use Designation encompasses lands which are already subdivided into semi rural residential parcels (2.25 acres as an average) essentially consisting of the Golden Gate Estates Subdivision. The area is identified as having potential for population growth far removed from supportive services and facilities. Expansion of the area shall be discouraged. Pursuant to Policy 4:4- 4.2 of the Future Land Use Element, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan encompassing the Estates Designation was adopted by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on February 5, 1991. Refer to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan far siting criteria and development standards for specific land uses. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *4* *** V. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES [Revised text, page 94] A. Area of Critical State Concern Overlay The Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) was established by the 1974 Florida Legislature. The ACSC Critical Area is displayed on the Future Land Use Map as an overlay area. The ACSC Critical-Area encompasses lands designated Conservation, Agricultural/Rural, Estates DRAFT Words underlined are added;words steusk-trough are deleted. Page .455 of Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 and Urban (Port of the Islands, Plantation Island and Copeland). Chokoloskee is outside the boundaries of the Biq Cypress ACSC. Two areas located within the boundaries of the ACSC are exempt from the ACSC regulations: Everglades City; and, Ochopee, which is described as all of Sections 27, 28, 33 and 34, Township 52 South, Range 30 East. All Development Orders within the Critical Area shall comply with Chapter 28-25, Florida Administrative Code, "Boundary and Regulations for the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern,"this ACSC Overlay,and the ACSC zoning overlay in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended, except as provided by Agreement pursuant to Chapter 380.032(3), F.S. There is an existing Development Agreement between Port of the Islands, Inc. and the[then] State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, approved in July 1985,which regulates land uses in the Port of the Islands Urban area; and, there is an Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners and the 'then! Florida Department of Community Affairs, approved in April 2005, pertaining to development in Plantation Island. - • . . -- _ '. _ . . _ -- _ 1 fY Those-regulations The ACSC Regulations include the following: 1. Site Alteration a. Site alteration shall be limited to 10% of the total site size, and installation of non-permeable surfaces shall not exceed 50% of any such area. However, a minimum of 2,500 square feet may be altered on any permitted site. b. Any non-permeable surface greater than 20,000 square feet shall provide for release of surface run off, collected or uncollected, in a manner approximating the natural surface. c. Soils exposed during site alteration shall be stabilized and retention ponds or performance equivalent structures or systems maintained in order to retain run off and siltation on the construction site. Restoration of vegetation to site alteration areas shall be substantially completed within 180 days following completion of a development. Re-vegetation shall be accomplished with pre-existing species or other suitable species except that undesirable exotic species shall not be replanted or propagated. Exotic Undesirable exotic species are listed below. Australian Pine - (Casuarina spp.) Bishopwood - (Bischofia javanica) Brazilian Pepper - (Shinus terebinthfolius) Melaleuca (cajeput)- (Melaleuca leucadendra sp) Castor bean— (Ricinus communis) Common papaya — (Carica papaya) Common snakeplant— (Sanseviera trifasciata) Day jessamine— (Cestrum diurnum) Hunters robe—(Raphidophora aurea) Queensland umbrella tree—(Schefflera actinophylla) Trailing wedelia— (Wedelia trilobata) All other species included in the definition of"vegetation, prohibited exotic" contained in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ord. No. 04-41, as amended. _ - 1._.. .'- ' -- -•- - - ♦-- , - ' - DRAFT Words underlined are added;words SZFLIGIC-thcoogh are deleted. Page q f'`1 9 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 d. No mangrove trees or salt marsh grasses shall be destroyed or otherwise altered. Plants specifically protected by this regulation include: . • _ _ . • _ _ e e • - e we. as-amen .• _ - - - - • - - - - -! . _ ' . • - =, Red mangrove– (Rhizophora mangle) Black mangrove– (Avicenna nitida) White manqrove– (Laquncularia racemosa) Needlerush–(Juncus roemerianus) Salt cordqrasses– (Spartina alterniffora, S. patens, S. cynosuroides, S. spartinae) Seashore saltgrass– (Distichlis spicata) ** *** *** *** ** text break *** *** *** *** *** 2. Drainage a. Existing drainage facilities shall not be modified so as to discharge water to any coastal waters, either directly or through existing drainage facilities. Existing drainage facilities shall not be expanded in capacity or length except in conformance with paragraph (2) "b." below; however, modifications may be made to existing facilities that will raise the ground water table or limit salt water intrusion. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** All Development Orders issued for projects within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern — shall be rendered to the State of Florida Department of Economic Opportunity for review with the potential for appeal to the Administration Commission per Chapter 73C-44, Florida Administrative Code, "Community Planning, Development Order Requirements for Areas of Critical State Concern". *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** V. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** B. North Belle Meade Overlay *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. RECEIVING AREAS [Revised text, page 99] Within the NBM Overlay, Receiving Areas are... located Sections 21, 28 and the west % western quarter of Sections 22 and 27, ...and the western quarters of Sections 22 and 27 as a permitted use. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Because of the proximity of Sections 21 and 28 and west14 quarters of sections 22 and 27 to Golden Gate Estates... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** V. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck rough are deleted. Page oflar Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 B. North Belle Meade Overlay *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 6. SECTION 24 NEUTRAL LANDS *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** e. Cowan Property — Lots 14-16, 25, 26 and 35 Combined (Colored Blue and Labeled "Cowan" and "Blue"on North Belle Meade Overlay Section 24 Map) *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 2) Clustering: [Revised text, page 107] a) Up to two f2,) clustered developments are allowed, and a maximum of nineteen (19)total dwelling units are allowed in cluster development(s). This dwelling unit figure is based upon the total Cowan ownership in Section 24 of approximately 97.7 acres. b) Lot 35 may contain up to, but no more than, three clustered dwelling units — in addition to road access for all Cowan property development(s). A second residential cluster outside of Lot 35 may contain the balance of the nineteen(19) clustered dwelling units not built on Lot 35. ** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** V. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** D. Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay Goal: [Revised text, page 116] Collier Countyseek t To address the long-term needs of residents and property owners within the Immokalee Area Study boundary of the Collier County Rural and Agricultural Area Assessment: ' protecting agricultural activities, to preventing the premature conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural uses, is directing incompatible uses away from wetlands and upland habitat, te-enable enabling the conversion of rural land to other uses in appropriate locations, to-discourage discouraging urban sprawl, and encouraging development that utilizes implements creative land use planning techniques. Objective: - - -- -- - - ` Create an incentive based land use overlay system, herein referred to as the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, based on the principles of rural land stewardship as defined in Chapter 163.3177(11), F.S. The Policies that will implement this Goal and Objective... Group 1 — General purpose and structure of the Collier County Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.6: [Revised text, page 117] . Designation as an SSA shall be administrative and shall not require an amendment to the Growth Management Plan, but shall be retroactively incorporated into the adopted Overlay Map during the EAR based amendment process when it periodically occurs, or sooner at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. ... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.22: [Revised text, page 120] DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stn44-tt r h are deleted. Page (AI 11 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 The RLSA Overlay was designed to be a long-term strategic plan... and reviewed by Collier County and the ! - _ . _ . -• - .' State land planning agency (presently, the -- Department of Economic Opportunity),upon... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 3.11: [Revised text, page 125] In certain locations... This pPolicy does not... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 4.3: [Revised text, page 126] Land becomes designated as a SRA upon petition by a property owner to Collier County seeking such designation and the adoption of a resolution by the BCC granting the designation. The petition shall include a SRA master plan as described in Policy 4.5. The basis for approval shall be a finding of consistency with the policies of the Overlay, including required suitability criteria set forth herein, compliance with the LDC Stewardship District, and assurance that the applicant has acquired or will acquire sufficient Stewardship Credits to implement the SRA uses. Within e ,- - ... . - - ° ' - . - - • =- , - _ .= The County shall-adept has adopted LDC amendments to establish the procedures and submittal requirements for designation as a SRA, providing for consideration of impacts, including environmental and public infrastructure impacts, and provisions for public notice of and the opportunity for public participation in any consideration by the BCC of such a designation. Policy 4.4: Collier County will update the Overlay Map to delineate the boundaries of each approved SRA. Such updates shall -_ : -' - •- - - , . .. - • e . retroactively be incorporated into the adopted Overlay Map during the EAR based amendment process when it periodically occurs, or sooner at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 4.16: [Revised text, page 131] A SRA shall have adequate infrastructure available... by this pPolicy... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 4.18: [Revised text, page 132] The SRA will be planned and designed to be fiscally neutral or positive to Collier County at the horizon year based on a -. . - •- -- -- _ - - - --- - - - - - -- public facilities impact assessment, as identified in LDC 4.08.07.x. The BCC may grant exceptions to this pPolicy to accommodate affordable-workforce Housing, as it deems appropriate. Techniques that may promote fiscal neutrality such as Community Development Districts, and other special districts, shall be encouraged. At a minimum, the analysis assessment shall consider the following public facilities and services: transportation, potable water, wastewater, irrigation water, stormwater management, solid waste, parks, law enforcement, and schools. Development phasing, developer contributions and mitigation, and other public/private partnerships shall address any potential adverse impacts to adopted levels of service standards. Policy 4.19: Eight j8) Gredits shall be required for... Policy 4.20: The acreage of... For the purpose of this pPolicy... DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck-through are deleted. Page of rig 12 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 Policy 4.21: Lands within the... This pPolicy is intended to... *** *** *** *** *** textt break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 5.5: [Revised text, page 133] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 2. Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species and for those protected species identified below shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated indicates listed species or the protected species identified below are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Management plans for new preserves shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on-site preserve and the need to maintain habitat within the preserve for listed species and those protected species identified below. 2.a. Management plans for new preserves shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species, and those protected species identified below, and their habitats from the negative impacts of proposed development. Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors. management plan&• USFWS, 1987. -. . -- •- _ . . -- - _ _ . . - - •, - - pee _ -- _ _ - _ _- - r - .. - in Florida, Technical Report No. 1, Florida Game and Fresh Water .Fish Fresh Water Fish Com, ssion i. Management guidelines contained in publications used by the FFWCC and USFWS for technical assistance shall be used for developing required management plans. ii. The County shall consider any other techniques recommended by the USFWS and FFWCC, subject to the provision of paragraph 3 of this pPolicy. iii. When listed species are directly observed on site or indicated by evidence, such as denning, foraging, or other indications, a minimum of 40%® of native vegetation on site shall be retained, with the exception of clearing for agricultural purposes. The DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struslc-through are deleted. 13 Page os, , Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13116 County shall also consider the recommendation of other agencies, subject to the provisions of paragraph 3 of this pPolicy. 2.b. For parcels containing gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), habitat management plans are required and shall give priority to protecting the largest most contiguous gopher tortoise habitat with the greatest number of active burrows, and for providing a connection to off site adjacent gopher tortoise preserves. 2.c. Habitat preservation plans for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) are required and shall - -- - • _ . _ __ _ - - - - -• . -- •• - •• • • . f also provide for a maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ . 2.d. For the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), habitat management plans are required and shall establish protective zones around the eagle nest restricting certain activities. The plans shall also address restricting certain types of activities during the nest season. -- - - -- -• - . - -- . - • • - • •;• - . - • -• - - - ... • _ . l � 2.e. For the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the-requireel habitat protection plans are required and shall outline measures to avoid adverse impacts to active clusters and to minimize impacts to foraging habitat. Where adverse effects cannot be avoided, — measures shall be taken to minimize on-site disturbance and compensate or mitigate for impacts that remain. •- -- -' --- - • _ . - - -. - _ - _ - •- - - - - !ee policy. 2.f. In areas where the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) may be present, the management plans are required and shall require that garbage be placed in bear- - -- • - - - r - - - - - - • - -- •-• bear-resistant containers where such containers are available and accepted for use by Collier County, or containers stored in locations not easily accessible to bears. The management plan shall also identify methods to inform local residents of the concerns related to interaction between black bears and humans. . _ _. . _ - _ - --_ - - - - - - - *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 2.g. For projects located in Priority I or Priority II Panther Habitat areas, the management plans are required and shall discourage the destruction of undisturbed, native habitats that are preferred by the Florida panther(Fells concolor coryi) by directing intensive land uses to currently disturbed areas. Preferred habitats include pine flatwoods and hardwood hammocks. In turn, these areas shall be buffered from the most intense land uses of the project by using low intensity land uses (e.g., parks, passive recreational areas, golf courses). Gold courses within the Rural Lands Area shall be designed and managed using standards found within this Overlay. The management plans shall identify appropriate lighting controls for these permitted uses and shall also address the opportunity to utilize prescribed burning to maintain fire-adapted preserved vegetation communities and provide browse for white-tailed deer. •- - -' - - _ - . DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stRiGirt-threug#are deleted. 14 Page of r_l� Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT-BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 2.h. The Management Plans shall contain a monitoring program for developments greater than ten (101 acres. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** ** *** *** *** Policy 5.6: [Revised text, page 136] For those lands.., of a wetland. This pPolicy shall be implemented as follows: 1. There are two (2) major wetlands systems within the RLSA, Camp Keais Strand and the Okaloacoochee Slough. These two systems have been mapped and are designated as FSA's. Policy 5.1 prohibits certain uses within the FSA's, thus preserving and protecting the wetlands functions within those wetland systems. 2. The other significant wetlands within the RLSA are WRA's as described in Policy 3.3. These areas are protected by existing SFWMD wetlands permits for each area. 3. FSAs, HSAs and WRAs, as provided in Policy 5.3, and the ACSC have stringent site clearing and alteration limitations, nonpermeable surface limitations, and requirements addressing surface water flows which protect wetland functions within the wetlands in those areas. Other wetlands within the RLSA are isolated or seasonal wetlands. These wetlands will be protected based upon the wetland functionality assessment described below, and the final permitting requirements of the South Florida Water Management District. a. The County shall apply the vegetation retention, open space and site preservation requirements specified within this Overlay to preserve an appropriate amount of native vegetation on site. Wetlands shall be preserved as part of this vegetation requirement according to the following criteria: L The acreage requirements... in paragraph jb,)of this pPolicy. ... the effective date of this Amendment, tThe County shall develop apply specific criteria in the LDC to be used to determine those instances in which wetlands with a WRAP functionality assessment score of 0.65 or a Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method score of 0.7, or greater must be preserved in excess of the preservation required by Policy 5.3. ii. Wetlands utilized used by... iii. Proposed development shall... be designed in accordance with Sections /1.2.2.4, _ A ' •' _. e _ . _ .. 10.2.2.4 of the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume 1, and Sections 3.11 and 3.12 of the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant`s Handbook Volume 11 for use within the Geographic Limits of the South Florida Water Management District (2014). *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** ** [Revised text, page 138] c. All direct impacts... of this pPolicy. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Revised text, page 139] f.iv. Prior to issuance of any final development order that authorizes site alteration, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with paragraphs (f)i, ii, and iii of this pPolicy. If agency permits have not provided mitigation consistent with this pPolicy, Collier County will require mitigation exceeding that of the jurisdictional agencies. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck-through are deleted. 15 Page 30 of Staff Proposed GMP Amendments FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** V, OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** F. Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay [Revised text, page 140] *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 4. Properties... may be allowed a maximum density of twelve (12) residential units... and comply with the standards identified in Pparagraph # no. 8, below, except for... 5. Properties... at a maximum density of eight (8) residential units per acre... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Revised text, page 141] 8. To qualify for twelve (12) dwelling units per acre, as provided for in paragraph # no. 4 above... 9. For density bonuses provided for in paragraphs nos. #4 and #5 above, base density shall be per the underlying zoning district. The maximum density of twelve (12)or eight (8) units per acre... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Revised text, page 141] 11. A maximum of... as provided in paragraphs nos. #4 and #5 above. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Revised text, page 144] FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES Future Land Use Map Activity Center Index Map Mixed Use & Interchange Activity Center Maps Properties Consistent by Policy (5.9, 5.10, 5.11, 5.12, 5.13, 5.14) Maps PLEASE NOTE: Approval of amendments to this Element is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear—within and between Elements—as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck-through are deleted. 16 Page, of T48 $ T47S T483 1 T48 $ TS@S aTp51S T52 (S T63S z .k ;4 i ` y R iff g ? o g y s, r s i ill 1 S 8( i. 3 iii i aii i ii i .itg ii:L11,411,4, 81:010..7. 15 3 s aa a ,a a ,r .t : ?1 Q 5 r s § 6 s t a 6 0° 5i ii,a3 S3 0 $a a°i3 vie 4n a 1° s. 1I . S g Rg gg3 1. 3 rt @ . �� . ' i i L.i_1 ,1- � l a �! 5" v I a s r‘ Y ! i g.al ,if i i¢ 3 33 Li 1 : m { a a :1 ! t`� vs 11 al`ahsb 4 3 ,, (I J k / m S Jr ~:g"F i i c 6 a 0 f! 1 az Y Iii sisl ii : ! ! .' J ,� •as ag E a V5 f n -'�a, ilQ�sfze a6 ji 'di g awesc1 s id a 3a i g S 1111-llsHilil is 1 s 1 a d : iliftl w! e1` . mem ate OD MOM - WI - _ Il t., .„2, it- gg y,$ A. $g 1 s gga�t a Oil p / 1 s 3 gg1 .9 � =1 y$ a F Y {y� ¢ if 5Vik" 'going. O a ia On' `� i1 a 1 i 'ti l h alf s a Reg tc.dgSI a , 1 1 '-'Er4 N lb' i 1 sails* it ! Ininis Q vs : is Ogi®MI NNE gin.■■■❑sr _s E=_ U� to N Ctl \\ 31, I y 1 ds • qg ` i s g 1 R ® = W U. Y t in cc a nt o w ir Z a , O 111111M_ 1 , ,/ vv e. .t.,:y "' .., x.=3 .-� < �.a.,.,,ct.� vi Pte` ». ...a `u d maxim ®-` ; L"_,i { te i a i. qq ' //yjf///J� , .! ,. ,� r liki 11111W i '"j'' /' clit.,D' er,.....4 rici. _fir , . P,/ Q d VOliaA�� li/ J'///` 73@yt5 ' ° 1,3 1 to i IN RA I CC 30;4 _ ` 0 1 r _ '/ `i e ' i fir§ s▪u �, F'. t 2 ▪y N '4 1 ,•••=)' - '.V 6 4 r 4- PageLli te WO 3° ".&$ n tc (J u:1. 1 () � Ili ° E S @t 1 S t4 1 S 8t 1 1 S St 1 I SOS 1 1 SIS 1 { S Zg 1 1 g ES 1 EXHIBIT'A" PETITION P1.20130002637(CPSP-2013-11 I R 25 E I R 26 E i ...---. _ 1 . I, It a* 1 I i1,11...,_,._:- ..•...---'-.•"--'-"-- C 121 LEE CO • --4,1, , \ 1 1 COLIKM . , 1\ 2.-- 4 • i 1 ',' " I I' .. - 1 4 1,...20 IA ,',71 C7 BM W. ,, '. ,e . .. , , , ',...„ '' in 1 4 —I I- ..,, 6! I 22 22 26 I / 76 , , 72 CR. 846 a - 4111 — C .'84 II _ Eli 22 26 F 26 I 22 I 1 1' IIII I 1 1 ! 1 ! I 1 I I 39 I ' it ‘ C.R 862 — C.71 ' : 1111, r•-• -_, t 1 . . -.-.. I 111 C R 189E I Ills. C A' 996 1 0 . 1 I It0 4 I In O. 1 I- 4,4:6, 2, . la" CR656 _ il L ____ . lit .44144.... roo.............11 , . n sl se . .......t,:. ' " , 1. 1.- . r -.., CR• 856 , 111111iii... '75 ' ...-- "-- rt X ' ,,., ,.• 7 54 . ,......) I. I . ,. . \ 1 ,. • I - DV\ I '-'- .e ' 6 62 , ., 12 (7,1,11 : 1 ...„...---.-- IA , .1 , % t SN, , .. 1 !,3 IA a MIXED USE Er INTERCHANGE \ i ,,..\\ /171e , '''`..... o In f > ' ACTIVITY CENTER _. IA __ i I- INDEX MAP 22L. 1222 1, 22 23 I 24 , _ a .4-6 -2 I • \ , 1 I . 1,-1 • C 1 171 7 MI 2 MI 214 2,' 75 , 22 20 1. 2,9 . n 27 Cl 26 as ; • ' T 1 ' I 1 ci scAls. Li Al4M3N'o.JANUARY20n50 (Ord. 3)25, 2005 1 . I& 35 i se 3 ,. \._......117..,‘"‘,.,__HL I I „.SN 1 c,• \ I . AMENDED - JUNE 7, 2005 1 , i 'Ti"18 ......... (Ord. No. 2005-25) 1 .,„ . 6 4 ,' AMENDED - OCTOBER 14, 2008 , . (Ord Na. 2005-59) \ ,--- -----,— I __, . AMENDED - SEPTEMBER 13. 2011 \\,,,k, I .1.rill 0 (Ord No 2011-28) 7.0 , 4' r IA sTi , * t- 1711 A, , I.. , . Is 14 ,, ' I,- ...„......, '',. •,t, 1-,,,, — _ - PREPARED Sr CIS/CAD WAPP=.NC,SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMNI DEPARNIENr CA-E 1/201E Rif ACCESS-INDEX-2018 GwG I R 25 E I R 26 E I ‘ Page I3 ofil r a in + 6g m L vl f x �' ,x j p <s R m qii > g S a Le ill N a o Y s 1 1 . r a s2�z. or z. a 311°1hY calm ! a Malt AM i • ii. MN __ , . 1 SIM I' I i� .Z mimii x� ..,j u U. ` ■. - . [' , - ii . 1 ( s 4 I- - iia �I 1 - KIMmaan III it MIMI MN n ri I ..., . U. . , � n 1 V 24 t)4,4130 manna-mem 111 —i® ED --. I : ;, CI t RII I. T ■ IR d I r } i �RR0j 31 g 111 lip di #10-11 cri .4 i , . .„;#40, _ _ 1 'i. a t it i ' 0 ° * IE:=3‘ --'' '4: )v , ,\440_4e/Ilili o 8 c"- --7 110:` 00. 47 i a C iii `''....' I - 1 L O > Edi 1 3Wi MOO w nXy at. _, of P i 0 a1--‘ f Ni m = a I1 2 (. S,i WWg x.= ZitT., r1 I Zr '� 3a CA ki NI rz F > F N a 6u W W F '�2-`(4 i 'S WY4 WD �F % „ d it i ,W f i AQt'd — a�Jn W Y " ' eso t b _ $ a iiik t\ ---i i,.�r I —`—is it _ --. ...3L j a. Ab ; - g gil , 1 al 1‘7 SSW .0.0 0. il 1 i i 11.$$$ .12k Alk_ I ; , # :t f g ' 6 4111110,4‘r e I i \\ **** 4" tio i...[ # irmmv,:. OAY 35`0,261421 f lie i I ``a 41111110 MA% 11 - T p di_ i 'iii b E viv ti :c . h1 Ala 1 i PI i/IP . g i n• i 11 II 1111 a oFF HEIM 11111111 111 Ills r2.17 all NM MUM U sill , i is if -- 4 ...i mum Rh. all Gip •'��1_.... , •I me; (:}. IA =risen; (•,,,—g= um1ani 7 MI IIMI Mg PM it a kiiital _ t .IF� , MI w _. .IMIr - =� � .a^ _ -a a. - = sp. ie d `6 I! ! Cia•r MINIC i.I ,__d NE ` . -- -- + 1111111111= NMI . -- IMMO MINIM /.'44N — a• MO �.w. 1 _I F*-- -"- 0 �_. nii . -moi E o o A �� Y "4 ,,iri Viii#_ iW g la i Ivil; i'' i Wtl€ ix-`.' a W rc i .-4- i i } Sia W o !gz g )• fuiI may_'; i n -' v 8 i� � o -. 1 i' iii- ~b 6- y st b u 4 esatl 4 n-u�� i_ r. 'wiling �� IL i 4,1(",--) : 2 i , 1 cb Itio alb NOOn V 1 €.M i d _ 74: iii __ , nu ak, h '44iir Si, yr„ 4) ` NM ar- -- a1 rwa.w.- - 4 i F _ �Q �r ii ;It`d Ss t r3) eS1bJsme¢stat i 1.1E � 4 4` r # L � 1 1 Ir. • I i t:11 OIL I 11 1, a0 1 i of 4 d i —...----t---- � ______c_.0.,5114.1 . 111clitillieffyialiiii.111111411111111111111 • , vs t) s 1 n y y� Cll O gie b Y ai Zsw =" Eh ° y a. E.g;gg �ai < 5 I t�a ° G �e tbilek 0...j ii i lihu --.-- — II I f I\ 1 I i d it s El III 1 t �_ 1 __--- in. " i i 1ii �� i'i i , 1 W II i i'l . --1 .) i 1 1 i' 'I ) 4101. , vfki t t " i a.L.ixa. v u.,H_. 0.a / i It -00.., i I Zittt f.... rill - , r ii + 1 ( >.a. ail \ U.Iorill ! . } / j § �1 _ 1 f / a _ Y i 1 P 1I i 3 1 i ; � 1 I _ Page of '.7. 1--- c '- s „ N F q bhyd g n '�T * i a dig_ ii I § N f r 7 1 to 11 rc,,,, i - 8 t`' C twQ ro r \�5 aoq I W ¢ xr r a. t I. 1 ( m$Yw1 3 us U; a c I A u I Ili rw I a \ 7 © '+ -. ,at � r 44 O a r i i# il — e '� II 1 j j -----i rig I. I.'* ii il 1 It i I SS T n T 1 i , 741r i I / 4. 1 1 Ato I C F I y 6 , tl , a co'� a4'ii kApit4, ii /II ; = e B ......... __,- k 1 a - x w v • z ip lir1 .1191. 6 . 1111 __ O 1 r 11 Rh a_ 21 1 it 4‘,1 _ 11 I....,.., 1 1 ie. ,---...__:.____), i,___.,__ ._____-;,,koc:_ 1 timemortl _ 2i I 11._ _ .. :.. /a r iik --\1 1 417 o i -1 .1 1 1 i) illr_c--) ,, 4111F d _, :=, \\/ , ,, , , _ ,,,,,, a. ... *..... I C '? ‘P404 I — i 41 if /API ' / in---"----__ .c,4141 .4 Gs. --7 c(r(--1w276',--97:t1t44 ;i LI 11 1 ''' cb Q;) 7-- Ok 7:- , fxate0,111 ) 01% I i Pi / 1 (3' ) t I i I I 'age .of B �r � R Y y w w I.! • } � �g 3 Z 71 tip i' b0 = W z1 w !wi:;; N A O p 1 1 19 y 1 o r. < Za 'i W q$_yl t gJ Ci: 11 ip ! ur` 7 � i g — g 4 III it 13 i f 111111 g i 1 i L___.,i marapil 1110117111.. I L y Ma I PI j ii 11 0 111111 u , 1 i 1111* . ft ■ z P. C= VII i 11111111111111 i \-- \\V- 1 Mil f\tii. a 2 ,..,,s. 1 ,s,......_:71 E E a p W f Page of 1 { s = a -- N Y - a su �8 - E :b VI K d li o F ' to of m N^o f � u a_ $ Z 'e Imn mw wi ®N c Ail; ® I- d n u „ %a we UN 40`l z fib: fif ' a ri 4 5 �k e < a ' e$ L C e 3 ma all 1.111 MIMI p ` II MEP xssi ThiA i d - ca. �� 1111f1( ► ( ff 1 ■ :1 Limmalw I 5I 1 CJ ► at- =. Iaz a co X j I 1 alI 1 ,ri I Jim ! 1 �., -� I i - 1 11 1 1 1 1 3 - MI Liam i 4 A i y ma e 1 -11 y 11 1 \ >< ' e @ r. ". .Z. -4.._ _,/"-----'--- --- ' 1 0 1 \\: 3 /11 g• i 21 i jj Page giL of ii a �j a>s M $ a 1e T a r 4l o r +; a t II a. OP\'',,,, ili, 2 , i ;::::- '.1: : . „, .., 2 ,,,..9, 1 g, 1 0 = f Yj ; s O,li a J u v- ` . d m 1 X50 414 n• q )~J . s8 Z�3 � �e vKv 2 t j E ��:M�S � y 1 '4e i a l I ? a ___.1 1 1 m, I 21 ` �� r aL i mu MO ' � . gip F mu . ) �W i ► s Emil it T/r.s ( / _Ay $0.0. 11. Sill _ E. � � 1 mi 7i at ► i . ! mi tir L'-'/A i , LI,,,gg.m1 $ MI lin � �� 1'x+#74 ; ■. _ Nom iM 1 ,4,14 .. ,_ .... ,.. ill _ Ill A ‘,/ ;e---"ritif-i''''''' :: :, Y. II rM.iLv tv it sy w r+nr•r.w - 4r rx 1110kn..4ew. •A • H ! yill `� 1 l li / ` • I1. ■ ‘. 11 ia N I II le MI Iii ._ ... i `gyp i c**,,, 1 , ate ; L^' ■ ��1t%I11IHI1111111 a E II it P. ),/ 41I111H11 t:y ,-)./ ,__.3 i t-N- 1 P"-\ % �"- 4 [, �t • I _ l - '7� Pa of 19 G 0 :to �'+ E e 7g� m Pi zw w t Sji w� W c y, < 3 - is IT, u s a P Ise 8. jp$m' 8H u :_wrt s ii. .....gin.+ i , 1 r�"$ I iiil 1 AO* I NM son albs 113 iv co, Mil i ----� irt j �_ kV -, 4 , ,i ....., III I 111 I JR. C7:ejr ELI C.I 1 !:"Pm rnisik II' _ trzi'a I ,1u�t1{i1H//;f :,.. al: I" a ,-. .' l+ .4.41., ":::.,/,',",„ :147 a'''''.1 C 5 Ell Iii d MI fl ii um priTzpvq !1 X11.. 0 ainLap i �► Eri ; 1rir gglnmll1u: f , :- 1 i II► til iii list 1 ....iiiii.uh"-anin7lata Nipntw, s 4 � witnindiqunti �iE#llr' # J -t-- alt'. �inmin o f fllOn{1 s c- 111411415 �al yinisi ut ��Illllllj��I`^^- �- pea mans CI'=' '119 L a00044.4. IIIIII31111111111V1 l' mann mi • r � .. TI iir�: It1 �IiiiIii� iii . -vaiiik 4, �! ..;.r,. f �nisa Ill*#l# NII Illi .= .:Cr 4 ##1## rr-- k „c. .a..'. it F i 2'At ��..r r.. 1 �1Ii imp*: NNE ,,4► WE'':: t �� !!!1 - . ri �� .�' D�. B 1•2;s. 011nh>.r�.,, A , i_; ■ V n; g -_.. ! . u 1k I[19 \ W djI ! e 1 UR 0v 51gv5a g Y. e. ti I yi` _1 e a ti 4 it..** ,.....- ,, s ;:>--,,, • i P .-sv' 4 tit .if 4 .+'4,/ .i. 411,1* 2 !ma ``, eyt`� tri ria,4,1,/-4,- Li. i 11 i-%."k i 41" 4. Eig 1 V _ 4(1 L i 1 _ 6 gee 8 i li 1 c le#7,:e i 1 , r i ! 1 . 1 iti TM [ if‘iilfiN i II-------I r ; W '� 21 I g + 5 r- a- i n-.:3 -. ,_131 -, ��.. ' 7. , ®..1111�01t I � —`Om Alli 1fi ��i11 1 51______ _____H roe - 021i g =lit IAIW Psa�rf6 10, lull" Ian, uwl ni i /114H017077.,eviii I �1. _T_____. 1, laill .i 2.,......„1.,u1 :. -- ,,,, y_ u ritir WI .'11!1_ 4 11 ijii; „ . i _ , a Q� i cY1 3E i g w 8 is 2 $ I W i l �`� ~ w w 1 s- .. Vim ` L. 3 7 " dIlig z i. 18. W '= d�a Lizji r' 01,0•1 M ilo.9.1_ ]M Iy ).. G ~� ! Alii �1Stn1,q: i� _ Re i `Ch�.r 3±±u0 kquneu „„--""--- a era um error MON aare•en d1 —1-1-------.H .• MO. r W: = - 1 ; 1 °':......1. sli ) yiit 1 -N---)11 w - - ,.k1,, "two (lf','J) @V3 '�kTiltd-11Wd0Y (l{',3) crud. �orks-.tlggtlM r all ►. i ■ ! ,1 Ci 3 Id 19u1 S ® , , 1446.7Milt. 6 411 - -of -F., 0 ___)' 1. - 4.,-., 1 Ibil II I 1 *7 N:N) 401. it ni i hisio i a 11 la vir°1- -4 11 Qi.. f N Wig/13M1,T Ory _ r_rrea,-- # u /� 7f 5 e � (( 17 j R ` - 1 a. t' ti Ali►� itiil1/*l . r Page of., " 4 i ? I 2 t 1 X --...4-1- U * <, , . -, gi 2 X 3 4 , i 1 2 X 1 1 77 7. . 1 20x1. 2,P A 0 I AM W .' 1 i 1411 a: 3 I id. \„ = \ . >. :I 0 O 1- g 1,.._ 6.- mgt- , w U 3. 3 . gi i M 1• 7. 11 ,SO 5 sigx§5 t v g 5g. ir• ici. ve.a a i r., I ii pi -----„, I .1 i --ki um 3 1 5 it vs _ „„ V III 11 i liEL,0:01, ---i% I -----"---- --"-----------------------,..„,_ i —7._ a It. 4 ' [ ! I 4 /km. r r ill, f 1 tes.oiseiTavram ILli....ww1110 111111111" 4 o q i ' b. feek.11 INN la I EV l ' WA Ili MI u pumas =dii - fa los U1111 L.41,111 • _,if", i , .. .. .. •x ne mil: ma 1.1.1%! tit WA 12 ,..‘1 r 4 k 1 I 111 I III lin 1 I 111 I 1 1 1 1". LI Sz =taw riw Mil- rdp iS 1111 011 i • mu! OW N ,r.• ma a I I :- :1-1 :-.1d :: . 104111111111111vhig i re*,4,1,-. vv, *7 2, I %%row-vit wi I.- ...:-. 0 4.4 k to,* so ii• 1 ,N,..000litki,A a41 sir wdra ! nu ii t t. #4.% it t '' ./ maip Ir-A t it : mis .• NE * -tom. ik ta .s. \ * 1.. ,,,, I 'um an! 21. satilltAllill wi ilia NI itiiii , ,---,. in .1.-... I NO W 4•41trim_. ret , m ,Irt • ot pi, Pak ar &Ai AM er 4111 A km- _wu , . - - -- 14 w gr. w . 11111 11. dill • Aci'rici lip, Affigiuminv' -IH1-11 itt '- -a ' -- -21 is- I i I_ .di in 14SI Pee genekl tto SIN UP PIMP I NO .440 1 Si I/ a 1 0 1. II il II - -i -1'- 7 ' 11112 11111 LI' I ' 111 1 1 = ! 1 ' LI r. I IP pi 3— ms norinuff At&vs i i g 1. • as 11 - '" Alin litat MU MI III pm ... Vag • I I% _ • vmamG mOi Mill I2 II itOr '" 310: i • •01•111111111111.1111111111 i 4 fai must* ; ' • mums 111 Villitifa t 1 in 411 1 . 11111111. ....gti A Tot tit- +111 3 .21r ii,A1,47/44,1 &Ir. 6 =-.141, 900/4A2 3 1 ' , 0 41P 4, in so al a= IDA:. /4.4:4t#-.4:10::::::: Eli- 41.-- jumill:-4411117-41:1114111:41111111: II!: ;I•1111.111111.m• 'CIIP4 Vul' 4 1•1; ',lit% .1 as ft 1111111k arif III re Ito ik III ,.... si 'Ionill•P ir-u. tab Ara ow - , i p P .' ,-. - . 1 011111111 * i All ifp r . a ler/ 4 4 mi wiessis sip. 4 040 * Lo 4,, i Lisgeossos 4i "'It ill O' 011111100 , AP Valle ,sn—N . -id1111.1111ftb. I — Ili _.lossit 111 4 IgeAS or lq 3 1 ! fi �aW1 28 aR e z #Y7 3 a1 R 2!o N N i Ac W I L' 11111 S 4-1- - filir - it 11 iq off_ III'' . . a; I + j 1 '77. — ift.10-,r111,44v ,, -- vissisliswvov di n. I 4: �1 1` � r 1 1 Fri iI it f.-� o = 11111lI11111111u1 I1 a t �,e . , r• 1 Ili 1 111. 11111 111111/.., 1 a+ � 11111111111111111 111111111111111011P ■ go 21 ' " �� �� a1113:G1111 /11LS u111r i' 4: L i .rte 3s :t i . y , tope I . iiil 1 . aralii I i 7i11.4 1 c---F2-----pB 4 3: z_T-: iit ..E i/ tem ilopril f II f _._. ;Iii 1 .; .., ....... -C lo IL VI% li ‘1 ! 1 P 1 -- '-- m . i i.;// 11011 * — tI. 1- CM aim I I it, i A I ----11(\:, * eq___,A. — in ja i 0.---- :- i(s i II Irt 441 ■!1 Immo . 1 '1 I . . ..--__ _ ii- I 4 IOW I tail i I I. X11Op�� . IINITI IMMO — V11 g 1 at s-TIirrlT I ,•,F, I i I Page, ,of,..21 N Y 2 a a itJ.If i i. 1 W V.': ri ya gw _ue 2 1l1 ! Q *4 $ ? : a, ti a-� 1. IN O. V o� $ E,0—s- w ib t a ani W 9 S4,N,,..il j a I. '4.3,f‘, .0;...... I x !:. 1 p lazzgli il I f I �� as .- I 3I, og.1`n i $ v. t \ . a 4 4 s . 4 m I ``td I . t! �' �� I E ► g — — ■• i, ' moi! Wilii CUM 1 141 7. uozr..r Ir • r to S. ,I _ " � I i �1.,..j ./ in a j -- — 1m'.a WOO nam ,n - � -_ —�— — —�—�—�— '—•— ' If a .nre,-&31 CO G ams MIN / / .TELE buil I iy I 1 ii vf I i ISI __. Page of y I El 1 i < o yisQQ .44 u CC 2 SiF O 1 . Wn g ''g iR p U NYy 4 ! S' W w` r 4� g! O d < I atso ao Z S . la u t § e ¢ U of DN &21 w J!1 m - w. z a " ( 41 lU F 2 v C 1 i§, 3 tie a n izi CL e irg S ! Q _.Ip J Nlinmemb -- INN Km nb.�E - •u IL ® Wa' —.rim a irAtt, 0 gil 14011014 rj .111011111 I __int 1114 11‘4ftdiVA ' e0 II. .,4011.0101111 al 1'4 IIIM — MIMI g 2111 '1 IA VIVVII:0 0 11140A S. t* * OW 1Z3 11 *fP .0fi°��� . ��1��� �l��� � 01111 I 7 c,„*"*14;44 , la 4$$11 **__-10,1100111111111 , ♦ 41■ 44 � ►110 4 4r flews *11 * o:c I M \ 0 # '.-44 A& • ./40 0„,*0 0 a iii 1 r•� o a "� ,f 1111 NEM MI4 44., OM i i I El II lime ‘ . Nr D lili ! , Ili 441'. t've&* # IA ialli 11-1 >.rmy _...,.. ■1 1 4 44 1114 , 4, sii: S�`IJ mmiiimm• Imo NI. V •4 it, 4, 4 NI lir= um • 10 11111111111611111111S�� f� '''4.1* r Illl'sN '■ ■■.l■ ■■ a W4 \ ., It ow ).,l 1 l 'MEri - :EN �,• ■ ■ ► 'Te" .� ! 444,1L . ,.>R IN i<rrni iT, ii alI mo IV ` AA,y. �, •• �♦.40' �i, \\ age 4P 0 K yl a la ; 1 jo ,c9 i i iag &4 v R. !1 ! i W v- W tp ri_krya A ao ,gZ,wwj �{w��jx W n Y : QJ d N N Wr, V Z t&s3� 1W-ci 1 3 p y..ga.g 0 S' ex n '' > if 3 ; a 3i to v 2 .g w _ .. w U 1 2 O zO "i 21,4; A 1G 2 S�[ki < Q A —.in C�i b t irprip 4111 IN S Q�t aj b d U t �� l�/ at ii 4 y, v �t 7I i a ! i `� 1 - t d 1 �.�/ 4.4rai :LtiGlisiLJ iii 0 I re lin L a.? Ast i I ®; Slip 1 i . I, * *141!1 17 il ; I. 1i 1 51 . ,st. aaaa, . r — ill ik .. 1 i t 1 . i�l� A.. i m ® TTTT 1 on mum 1 - -01 u44-thiiiiiiQU Nprow=azgar; - w.J=T L L. ! tJ .ate: uionv iw•PoliCT 1.1 1 IIM IIINIIIIIMIIiuN I: d a .. 5- � 4 ''i ai v 04 i I;g1 Q b�� g Y! JI: aad � o u ' — i ¢wz ` ' g g F 0* 4)-— L34** - lora R Ili a� = �! 4prik_, t© *i` „gm LI 0 8 0 .1 Z. 1/1 \ o 438 m 1 iW41r0 *At\ gi< Iire 1 la VA. !e- © 1I tot# • a �� s f'r`o. �� � — r 8.4 , gi.4 (7. 4 1. 11111S0 40' ikt 41IP a, 4-10 31 il ‘,0- 11.0ropk:144,4:\\,, ,,J1 4 4440 411,:pi, 'a Al a I w --- -- + ‘ 2= ISM Maar .+ � 1.*111 iNirt IN Sift OrIC) i ill * i MI ° .4 . ``.�� E 15 ; / 4,Er am no aim Mig 4111* ' , hr t 404 la .2.4p.1 / assugart .4:7" 4 4 &a a 3 ' 40, i . .... I i 4 liv „,,, iikikto di — ■ in tG ill ill . Si AM .., so law • r ' `: ::C IIIM r" s ����OF El Nom NE NI i g111=1 NON 1 Igi i MO hilll ,".. ei mins a mu .0 4. I,APalla illa!,_- o 1 _ h ..-.. b e •O b 6 Abe m cv �\ YI III ¢ca o �o Z a e a� 11 2+ F W @ ! $ p. ? 0 Soo Qd Q $ J 141V. S a nd i f ....7_,:;1. i (--14t.2%\\� ss "1!1� •tit 0 `f � q1�, 1 88i . 41 i 1 l'Ap -,.4",./ 1 /..; ..,,a ti= f, ° t I 111— � �� gn : 1' imill I 4.1.9004141k e f!!lffl 1 11111 I i111111111M2111 M . %%, * i #f ®fig I. 4114PF .....-_ ! 1 Q/ VA A 1(3 -• i1, Ii i v Op./ .4„ „4, ,' / "1671;E° 1 ilit,..„0,1,144./ ,iii .,-; Q) * -4 0 i ( ! . 1 Al: si Ar, ik i A /41 1 IWIP\ / 1- " ,.. a_ i ‘'..* _ (\. i. a -- I?et 0 V 0 tat iiimmooll i .400- t. NI*li gi) ii i I: :: ILO -C - mi in dat,,,„, Irtimmilflin ( ¢� i ,/ �...d 1� ��{*, ' a / Aki,‘ 441'40 1,-,w' a ossolfigillEalit 1 t Palle 51 of noa - �� N na.g ill jJ J„gl W gii gl u9 C 1!,./..i : a is l' Ii ____.._._ �2-.] c k 0 t R Y v O -..e,,.., _ NerutiNftrprti EP ; .. . a +I 1 vi��. i, 1 a t i J amu^ a . . # —y s" � ill n mil. `i- _ 11= ••I ��I�II�nAliii C'��4. ® :1tI' q r of i{lluifi�= %ni.� . ,. w°1 " VI 41 —AI ." fi, i rn-T.,.= I V—) I 4 El t •#I 40 a�'. *il 4t, r en;gill ` II i - k_ {} I ' is �. r`rsi iiia - .. ...riiiinnifk._....dill = �" �' , �i aim ii, 1 a * : 11 hurl '1.,.‘%-% 9 L I rs/ L- a, _ 41�d C. 66s e t a.+m. A I . r 1 �� If11I1111r1TfT g f i —' s 111111 I I1Ti .? 1 s R 111111111 i Q[ == I E EE M� t t ll /mumenk ' [ j- -.1-111;1.1 I lt.'I � , c A • IIM 5 . ix � 21 411:1P A Qi it F1S1 I [1 E- s I 1 Page -Q - I _ I _ , s st? i n N 0- LO i a. C.) _____ I — ,.....„ . fp I „..., 1 . v 1 ... CO f I °I-=- --1 , 1 CI 1 ... _, E-3 ! 1 Nem p E.: ]_____L N i 1 WM I Il 0_ I IR L‘i rill . A to 1 I z FL- Ili I 1 - a,. rii I 1 9 I r ALP I i w 1,0 W 1 ,..,.......,-1 III , ni to fli -1 _ NMI re iv in , , - I re 1 , - , mow; _ u I 3 , ,ranamemommuliaini ,...---.-...., w• ...' , ,- allaw7:suraar iiismumpw 1 f ....... .:;,:e.' , ) •c't T.==ige in an mai zizzig il Cl. ru 11:"---' ...--;":i,I_-4-..141•-‘.- =I=Mit EIS rm rall.1111111 ). < In "' • - .. .- ormiou a 11-,mg ammo..imi ...... :—--,21- .1 - .......,, -7.....; .- WZ114==e11111111•11==1=3 Oa a Lb - ___, „. -.:il 4.--.1* - ..:,.. i.: i .. ....::,i c - -11.N1111Wilitiff iMultitiessim W m In - .4.•*,-4‘47.-: 11,-. i c-----••-.1 t Aaillil .. /1 - ^-'29-11--. 1 ;1411111111ffirelleill nisi lin ni • 0 fti 54. ,0,Z .,—Ei 1 Iriiiiiiiii.11111P11 - 1 q. _ _ ime-,•_110 tri 1 u. w _ .- NN 'c'EfilIMIHNIIII II .01 .........• _Mink-- • < ...0 ... •i u. z it i do' IL " 0 to 1 < u ei ....i'Mlielmior -Vim x '17 1: II I W.- a - u. ... me- , NW.,WWWWWWWWWW.1116II pa - - WWWWWW1.nrtnitme I". w ... r_fLa 1111111 111i111$ Fl ra-i u .7-. ,.r.•! i ,4 IrlillIME i NW WI E_ ' iiirggri in ..1 IA =1.—,s,gild 1, .. Z02 1 , ___ , - • 4, la 1_1111,I o u i_ _ -tell -- ,--..- I , 1 itIK.Lny.s JO I______, is 1 , _ 4 4 - ‘ - !Al l I- • t- - . 2 -6 - 1/ r•': ,. i \--?'1„„11 ''' 1•nrili v- N • .m ,,,m,_..-f.,arzi I W :II vrviairini IIBPPII-gillIllrri_ 11 ------- = Z 11441_, Ir ISEM_-;7--— IL- 4,.4 N -TM= A tie, „ 1 •,•• 1 ----......:_•,„ A''''''-4,1 in A N : .1 E.7n ' T— ' Ala 10 4 ratic 1 r tiols k .,i3crarin 4i .4.........e(- , PJIU 1,11 W p , p[3,Z in ni 4-- - :til a. ..... ..____.-- 411,75111111 \,-,.::3 1 % IN - ru NZ t,,,-'; - EC lir., ar • 1 a . -111 SP j -, * - --0 1 Iv.k-11; t i a °44 II 111111a1 ir al Ill qs. h. .iiii ii‘. P7-1k4' ' - r iin 's 1 ,.,..,_ - i . ii . p• Il ti ' fWr";. 66. fi PZ gircpik, il ' fill •tief4 4111a I 1 i 1 Liji a . 11-2TV'*1-6:1 ' 11111101\I Li ii1111--+•'it "-4411111 ' Silt in:VA.% „....„4,50t. 4., '"" irill ' - . s OS ,-:,-- - II iv 11; ;,. ,...? VliWIZ . ii' OttMil ----w-1- t*'7 Pap f -) o - E •* II 0 II a hi' f NI "---... 7 1 5 5 1 n 8 fl I 4/3 ,..--, i ,..... .. linsamerrimoio MN".: ''''• MmtM1101 m 1 — •••••• gminimiezininimiNINIZmniimgim min=Nu mumnum mitumommumaannonnuni IN• .....: ISINEFINU=ifigriUMW1121111110111e1=2: put e3 Mg 22 C=1111,4911192.=914;991911 is0 CV MINN 111111 • mmtifillIMMIL —a— out. mummum..219/999111111192111911ei ....Al swill "5 BESIgag=12Xife§21:241222:22.1.1.12'==.2=2,2M i v. tilma=teraEguin='. .2 22=1/21 .1221,4 MT im.•=•••••11,x,m a III 2=04,,Fe atEEZZ'S,22.4.12==..,%1153raireCEIPTiiEll.7. L'Il_ Norszz•laminmolm.tallow=aim:.,_,,,,,mx•mammtmrm•,,,,,,s,m.,21,srmosmm=„Z Ut a F.--- itaininntaituirPmiatinq i-MiNunne,nem,nutniquip.... 4...1 r.-- Ifunininiilinitkimmull 122211311 ' .- II n • I - 1,1,1 A' J. • Q /PT ZZES=5•16w,g5=122EE.` 2=2=71 i ) ....— NI I im,, ,_„„,F---- IC CZ Mr.=cc,crAc cm cc=,, to M 2 22=92 .7.1=1199222 I 1-b r IP 7:17/iiia-. RI 2 0 ramiSMIneumais 2791721='"7.222= ' it ,_hi' mai. - - a...............- . ,„.— n‘, . _.,,,.. a 1 c in ima123 -..--=22======212 (Ai 1 ti/pr Di sf. ,,,ms-a,=--raisiEcitc Ea raccn -E' I - I lit g......_.1--,Iffrneallizan- - . - zzarazt.IRESTimagEl g —govniiiiiiRrifiiiiiinfirs'Eil - , IttilittiliUininalasisitiitliii tOM HMI mu$ - I NMI .' ,, mom Yoko ma iv cs,-.1.•,,,-_,o_ _ 11 "-' "11.74 Mull iiiiMff 411111341%.1 .-. < .:-r.' i -''' 11E-1"-=.1:ElErez:z --_-".+4- '; (.:',, a a _ _ -.4.7 . / ,,,__ImmeMm•••.1,..====1114 _au 2.4„, .0,-.,., \, -, -4,, .=- Ez =2: „4,__:-_-__;.4.411,41Nro1 . IL i in .....,, ; g---;:s 0 ''';•,.4 sA.eff==---,a2=2:2 =a74:-2-9 si-c-.E-.,_..•.4"d/i Lga—pk• „,..-..„ w te r:.1 aff, ,...pa=aimmi .a. "!_,.. cncriza•Immulal er 4. taw ammo .7.' z w •-7.7.t'="F'-'-c:Fi*Iimer.....i 1 ' k t, i Illmer- 1..^ M - 0-4Einz-Ez. nn nil gar'1 En c, ;43 IR ..... ...=..rmaillfir )_ 111111/1= 1111111 ._ra “ ,_____ ._____...e, IIIIIE4MISI . • _ magal,....--- ......- ..... ...... X X i Z D. L',7 '----- --.."..' IMEIMINIVT. - rieits,‘ la -,us.1.-4161 - 1, I.- -1 U rr 'F.', ° I 1 VI 0 Z vr c11 ri -' :4-----., dwL-- .. - C4 U II 1' I Ell I II''til/. t :144 im I- - Tliiiii1014111110E ,,--mo Fai er-,._-*F4„ II`...ins 1 1.3 iiMilir litt'lls'71.ko.114 1411.1- ig _k 4 401, °U, V.' -i. ' 11. r7 ma3. - 24 LIB Or113 r'31',,r A„w I,1 • ,'Y's LI-V1 r.- -.5 A ii d' ;1'7 n i 1 i 0-1 - ' 7• . t IP If”,4:sn---- --411 rk----''' 14 - 411. al,,L. ll, N ~ 29 12j2-1-, I 1 ' ISMI-aE:. ."...*. .--:'--;'' 1 I 4--..„ lil WI 0 in in LIIIMINEJE ..an.-77_.d„.._ 1 . . . • 1,-11--t 1111 USX .,.. x...!-.SIVI - 11 -_=99I - - -- ,=•."" •so t 2 r,l .,-- L• - - .----- - - -----v...., us uum «,„,,,,,..,. — . . III Filit'Acrilig.0*.Irar,1 . 1 ' 1.011 , IF.P:11P3L1. =s."1 tolt,44=4.,,,.: :134:e1=,:‹ Ill 2. I' ' VE.,,-;"..''',F., N nar....-- --"4-119:2911a.arika:. .I it .: . r ims , -!.- -- LAM., CC ; 111:L '—' :,11411_•m111,111=rAlikill4S_Tfetki3W0414,41.,' _,...aig''--s•••- 10°' ' I WMilitifiredellif 1,......4) -,- 4- .,,_ 4 !il,:re "C1-1-70":-P°"*".---I ---•'OM faral"7-11 `. C:---.5.' . 1!i„4, it 1..,,,, awl ftrs-cotordo :----_,..: --_-_z-___------- r iii.1 l ' 1 I______-- Rhit..• ri1.40 di 1. cc. 0 -/.. !,11 IONE t T 49 S I ih _-, Page 54,..of a r�, sos .� 0 N CI Cl_ U e M 7D N i L N - w _J- - ISI! _-_ im z r t��1■� I y � Milli O I �1 ire 4. al • �3 d .11" n- ► 1... _ mr 1 En1!nui: �'C� Wa .., �Illl��i r. W to V_ Al 4111114 rii 116) i ' .1 i 1 11 i .1 .4.‹.....1 re 1 i 1 . Cl."."1 4 !ii a im ,t 1 � 5d N —iil O.0 c I CI 1111 Yf� i.2 "•lir ,,,. ---� , 9 N IA uuu.: OAC.... _i ��f - - ''' -• ,,I , -ix ,Ar... lum. ......., 1.... ink‘,1 0, •Ir s IW tL 2 I :� � ` M■ II IN ii1Ij�.11111 molai! Ca J I E' t ••`1 Willi��C.�� �1 /'i ... • ary C tT T •� ..• :4-------1-4:75.77-',..=1.7---.-----":-.,-z..--,- - : X a 6-3 3 c o 0' 1+�,. ., tee; .� t 111114 41, �1• Z ® Z 2 ! r. �r �" + +; " ;u z �A'' Ir -o mss: s I r. 'ilk�l� Q 111;-187-714 7 i ',I� r "A �__ `' .�! 1 � ii:if/ 1 r a J/ oit. i1� YYY Z I ■ Y I - 1 Ca I iU iY 6nri: �I r�7 1'� i- �� Mill III fki yC 1,az w II _ • , +r r I ( II 111 y :l Al 0 }, h11 I:ts7lkikt ,� � ,i1 -u t ;a a .°s c� ',l 1I m ' :16.6 Page .. .of N ' jD ■ ■ ■:Iii ' 1 !1 i I SIS J. l n 0 cs i a o a_ o n co N 0 CVa ,.. i_r.,..„,z -' :'CI I rap , i 1 1 -- Be.,bi4 ...„.....";,,,. Li w - ;- ftn a jJ '., 4 n :,m j "Allirlig 1 '#'.---- 1' \ ,.._ Ill W a. 4N rii,' .� — _ t to luis al T. H gib—. _' .\; q . IL M mg _ ,,, , �' < ,r, , . " ', o Ii ILI LJ III tp "� ti's -:+ � IMI *4 14c ` i Z G `` I 416..... 4 IRO. 4' WAAL _ i d' fr-' I W , f� J sr _! W N rum cc ,.. ii t o(d � ffrP I] Vie is 1Y u til ix y ill Page_ L of, `' --- � I , ` 3 i ° FS 3 11 1 111 grt .I EDEN gFi_ gy EXHrerf W P12013006207/OPSP.20.13.11 •'DST• COLLIER COUNTY RURAL&AGRICULTURAL OVERLAY.' STEWARDSHIP EA ASSESSMENT v0 0 it .164 . GOall iti _ iv ii, f, � •� �} 4. b. ill MMMOKALEE (, 1,,, ' MaID ir tip‘ : ' * '-'. -- , ,_ : _,21.': ��r , E3 ,,,,COM -.. 11111pho 1-0-0. 7 '''''''—- ' 4 2 i '' v�tA Hil �_ ssr., t't ;star 1 Gtt ,461,..„.b i m N' Myy�1I G• ,.a . TE BLVD a ...,:,} re,- aw 0147 110 Sow MI...s,20147-111) (QK kV,mor-sr) ina ON* -IteittisawsienZui mom-SWIM=t]7(41 .....(a*Mt.ant-ay M....N.,..........0.4 -Ixeaymi Wawa NNW 0II..1e,.p.M.INMiwAtwMO)®A1..m046,.... .a..Mt 1 -WINfL Ares MA) =I bhp PlimiogAwsOW nerrallts n:es/coo Wn.ea smod .....= 51105RR W IA IH?cam/q,MitMG AW 1KON...! OM iMis tut......-s.... PageSimko Arta ISM} Page of 12. gl 5p F b i oj. 8 Y }5��1 o jJjIJII1 i na c� i7R x lig a i I 1 I i i PI if iv 7 ' bh i I 111 a 1 E mI a z 1a aE I 0 fa 3 I i . . '1)! ,a, I b E - I Vi 1 i P 1 I il 1 i d . 56 _ C 2 3 11= / IC'3-_ 0 1 J 04 -2 sir. m cT - 2 ' ijii P E � -E= . If 1 I:4 R E .. ; . 4 L Iji m � ��zi8 5x 1 SiIll li u a $ 0 0 C g .i00 1 1 e a a € n a �•--� Q C J U ' a • III a a lb F o As a i ' !f FE 30I j i i i ; a o 1; o 'E o I r jJlij fJliEii li $ - ' 1g crE% _ 1 Pa I aob A P a z o i$ SR 45 B4 i n g .ill .� 1 i !III All nV. i° . ib 1 1.gli Iv wy 51 i I jJ IJ1JJij Ji I ' ll: 1 7 18 i ' 111 Pg i111 i a Y ,AZ'v c n f E4. E I 15 1y i 6 E I iJi I aP C V O ! 7i I 1 I I 8- 14—v1 ' 8, a 0, 1 .h,„ 1 , I . liii �lip i . Page Fcof _k Staff Proposed GMP Amendments GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 PL20130002637/GPSP-2013-11 EXHIBIT "A" GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN (GGAMP) FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES [Updated map, following GGAMP text] [Include the updated Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map labeled as, and included in, this Exhibit"K.] PLEASE NOTE: Approval of amendments to this Element is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear—within and between Elements—as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document. Page Li of I DRAFT Words underlined are added;words str-uc tfe g are deleted. LEGEND ...e. I!HANDEEIQNATION ESTATES OEIIO/YlnoN AORIC4LTNULARMI,4L SENGNATYON I AS k* - VIM NNE YLNNO NM/PSE ManiT 1.4..fE1P,,ENI 4.4.rat, �j i r'I alsw.cNUENN.s.msw 0+sal.r..moo mom," OVERL - -- 34 ��"M' '�Y.AMO GOLDEN GATE AREA E IN PI.[Nth 1sVY[4e_N 2..4P1Ct �� SaenNs CReSN WET<R4 u.KPyr- i .KK+®M1r3R 6:102.1.00.01 E P[cwwc e9CE1•.P.ASt ate-T 4Ytimay NA9NCT .;Mira Fw�. FUTURE LAND USE M A P VI �.a Y,. e� ■N.t.a.$N..r.e. . % P ■ .,E, N. 0.WAIN..SANE..,8S4•14, CANNIM9YY o1N. . f.?.Z c._M.t..Rla }u: Ril.Nmr.NM.7 T S�f1N.r eP..eNnN`..' maallo w�a rlNsa 70.Am 77.10r0 Na OAI 1 =UP.701 0.1.a cwl.r.ci.:_,.TSIs. 0•PA•OX.eK 200 f¢....PCr I%IMOKAi EE ROAD ....GNI.BPufwN]COMM!svEA4C. 0I-� •'ro: LI a�tr�ar'� *rtr IN....' oor.ar>ul WOANPEPNCI • NP.! 1147 MAP[Oka Q 20120010 NNW PE WALL CEM.NW[0 NO iwx r 07594/4'.06R4PP 23[0.00 M 6x00.W0E 0.11K.PUN 1 I C.0 �. CO aOIL WELL ROAD F7 0 IMMOKAL£E ROAD u ® z RANDALL BOULEVARD e- SUBJECT SITE C I $ CRSP•2013.11 51 VANDERBIL� �t BEACH ROAD u e I IS p u GOLDEN DATE 1 BOULEVARD ' i z `u} C�t UU PIKE RIDG RD. .�.2 , 1 WHITE BLVD. 0 1 t �� ` re n 71.100 R G.G.PKWY. - 1 p O C,' O C 1 COx < a rxrERBrAr as k' S.R.84 .../- . . E.2 DAMS BOULEVARD.° j S.R. 84 ex ,Y p 0 O}F T' pax __ GOLDEN GATE E LAND USE MAP 1. ADOPTED - REERYART,1091 '..OYE0002 - 55013711 0.20Pr I - - fI 00 2007-77 0 f010190 - MAT e&1292 7 AMEN$o -- ?07094.9 to 2o5 1 < 00100200 - 007 20.M3 Oi 4 003 N0.258-99 S 00100900 - 017 27.1022 1uotwoce ' A[.,xi 200 i la -2 ONO No 2010-21 . 0 00!0010 - 4000,L 120 r 'dean - .r 22.20•a Q- ..l 01102010 - MARC.IL 1203 OSO NO 20iG-S m 107 AMMO U0'020 2 10.201, F AMMO - OC[MER 27.192A ®,0.NO 200-2E s e 00E0002 - NA.II.129E 4Nov i01921- NO0202 Ml 201. 000 NC 101_11 0 Y0 AA00D 01 - 50.10 (1 L 4.932 I 0M07C£0-N-M61ASCR 01.2015 /---7. 070200 - FEBRUARY LI 1993 i>11 ha 2715-521 4112) .._, AMMO - MA,9. A10NORO - 1.11810.II 2p.13.2001 0157000 .. 00 0,200 0E1002 . 501211001 10.0002 SCALE ..... CM NO 2003-11 g /j_�`9 [�rN 0(00002 - 2(0600 20.tow $MI. rage c o_ o1 - DRD NC.aDO00E O 'MI ?KI. Lp a 41. 7 r 0100( - 4000000 25.24.749 CNG.NO.POO!-S PREPARED 100 OS/CAO MAPPING SECTION MEN= _ 040 2001 CRONIN NANACDAE4T 000497190.12003 012.2007-4.9 DAZE'1/2016 7a, CAW-x013-0-.DAG ONO R2fiE I R27E J 128E Staff Proposed GMP Amendments STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13116 P L 20130002637/C PS P-2013-11 EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT (SM) Update and make current the Table of Contents. along with corresponding titles, heading and other entries—inside and between Elements—to maximize internal consistency. II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES GOAL 1: [Reference text only, page 2] TO PROVIDE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES AND SERVICES FOR DRAINAGE AND FLOOD PROTECTION FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, MINIMIZE THE DEGRADATION OF QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATERS AND SURROUNDING NATURAL AREAS AND PROTECT THE FUNCTIONS OF NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 6: [Revised text, page 4] Protect the functions of natural drainage features through the application of standards that address the quality and quantity of discharge from stormwater management systems. Imple ee-htation of this *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 6.2: [Revised text, page 5] Collier County's retention and detention criteria shall be one hundred and fifty percent (150%) of the water quality volumetric requirements provided in the Environmental Resource Permit Applicant's Handbook Volume II for use within the Geographic Limits of the South Florida Water Management District(2014), or its successor, as it existed at the time of project approval. Policy 6.3: Allowable off-site discharge rates shall be computed using a storm event of 3 day duration and 25 year return frequency. The Land Development Code includes a list of off-site discharge rates by basin. The 951 C anal Nerih Basin 0.11 cfclacre Sub basin 0.06 cfs/acro Sin {Semi-of Vanderbilt Beach Road) d- S-4 0.11 cfsiaere e: -_ _ - -- .'. - . __ 0.01 cfs/acro 0.04 cf:/acre 0.06 cfs/acro 0.09 cfs/acre {North of 175) 1 __ • - _ _ 0.09 cfslacrc DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stfusk-threes are deleted. 1 Page 1= n 7 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 j, 0.011 cfs/acro 14, 'iendeM an vrcc4-vuarn 0.08 cfs/acro } 8.96-de/aGra 0:0.12 cfslacro 0.055 cfclacro (ak _rve Q u) Gin 0.06-sfsiasre i 0.06 cfs/acro - -- - -- - -- - _- - 0.04 cfs/acro fr Palm-River-Canal-Basin 0.13 cfs/acro pine Rinne Canal Ba 0 1'2 nfs/acre „ All ocher area 0.15 nfc/acre hose listed above. a. Topography e.-- Vegetation types ,,,. d--Antecedent-cond tions - _ - _ se - f. Depression storage capacity - • C - -..-.-- -- - - - _ - -. - - - -- - - PLEASE NOTE: Approval of amendments to this Element is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear—within and between Elements—as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words str-tieli4n-rough are deleted. 2 Page 6‘2,,of .... Staff Proposed GMP Amendments TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 EXHIBIT "A" TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT (TE) Update and make current the Table of Contents, along with corresponding titles, heading and other entries— inside and between Elements—to maximize internal consistency. LIST OF TABLES/MAPS/FIGURES [For informational purposes only, introductory page iv] TR-1 * Financially Cost Feasible Transportation P'an Network and Traffic Circulation Map — Year 2035 2040 TR-2 * Needs Plan Assessment Protects Map—Year 2035 2040 TR-3* Collier 2003 2013 Functional Classification— Countywide Map TR-3y4 3.1 * Collier 2025 2013 Functional Classification— Inset Map (Coastal North) TR-3.2* Collier 2013 Functional Classification — Inset Map (Orangetree Area) TR-3.3 * Collier 2013 Functional Classification — Inset Map (Immokalee Area) TR-3.4 * Collier 2013 Functional Classification — Inset Map (Coastal Central) TR-3.5 * Collier 2013 Functional Classification — Inset Map (Coastal South — Marco Island Area) TR-4 * South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) Map TR-5 * Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) Map TR-6 * East Central Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA)Map TR-7 * Collier County Hurricane Evacuation Routes Map TR-8* Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Facilities Map TR-9 * Regional Transportation Network Map *** text break *** *** *** *** *** A. FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS [Revised text, page 1] 1. Travel Demand The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)2040 Long Range Transportation Plan's Financially Cost Feasible Plan and Needs Assessment Plan as adopted on December 10, 2010 11, 2015, are hereby incorporated to define the major roadway needs for Collier County. The 2035 2040 Financially Cost Feasible Plan is presented as Map TR-1 and shows the needed roadway improvements that can be funded through the year 2035 2040. Map TR-2 shows the total projected roadway improvements needed by 2035 2040. _ - -- _ - - • __ be funded from reasonably anticipated revenues. While the total 2035 2040 needs are estimated to require funding of approximately 456 2_3 billion dollars, the cost feasible plan reflects funding of approximately 602illlen 1.2 billion dollars. Appendix A presents the 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan resulting from the Urban Area `= - ! .. Map TR-3 and Inset Maps TR-3.1 through TR-3.5 shows the existing functional classification of the roadways - - _ A - _ _ __ - in the County. The refinement of these plans maps to incorporate updates to/the- MPO's Plan, development of a collector road system and results of corridor specific studies, shall occur on a regular basis upon approval of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC). DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck-through are deleted. 1 Page 0 3 of- 1. Staff Proposed GMP Amendments TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. Five-year Capital Facility Program [Revised text, page 2] The Collier County Transportation Work Program is reported annually in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) for future five-year planning periods. The improvements shown in the AUIR represent a sub-set of the needs identified in the Collier County 2035 2040 Needs Rias► Assessment Projects (Map TR-2) and are included in the current Capital Improvement Element (CIE) Schedule of Capital Improvements, as amended annually, for funding within the next five years. 4. Future Traffic Circulation Map Series— Section 163.3177(6)(b)(1), Florida Statutes requires a map or map series showing the general location of the existing and proposed transportation system features. This map series present the following: number of future funded road lanes and other improvements on ea h cility; roadway functional classifications; and multi-modal facilities (ports, airports, and rail lines). Map TR-1, { the 2035 2040 Financially Cost Feasible Transportation Pl..R Network,3 serves as the 2035 showsing the funded road improvements through 2040, including number of road lanes, sidewalks and bike lanes - - - - - .. _ - -_ - :- _ _ Map TR-3 shows the 2025 existing roadway functional classifications, and Map TR-8 shows the multi-modal facilities in the County. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** B. INTERMODAL & MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION [Revised text, page 3] 1. Non-Motorized Travel *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** The Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan, developed by the Naples (Collier Geenty) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff, was adopted by the... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. Mass Transit [Revised text, page 6] a. Purpose *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** The Transportation Disadvantaged (TO) program is coordinated by Collier County, which has been designated as the Coordinated Provider by the Naples Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The TD services offer home pick up and delivery transportation for the elderly, handicapped, and economically disadvantaged in the County. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** C. PERSPECTIVES *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. Inter-agency Coordination Cooperation [Revised text, page 8] In Collier County, the responsibility for providing transportation facilities rests with several different agencies. Long range transportation planning is the primary charge of the Naples--(Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Introduction: [Revised text, page 111 *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stfuek-through are deleted. Page CA of 2 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12!13/16 The Collier County Transportation Element meets the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes (FS), the "Community Planning Act". The County has coordinated this Transportation Element — with the Long Range Transportation Plan of the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 3: [Revised text, page 13] Provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights-of-way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program, Board approved development agreements, ander the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, plans and programs. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 3.1: [Revised text, page 13] The County has implement shall maintains an advanced Right-of-Way Preservation and Acquisition Program. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 3.5: [Revised text, page 14] A. The County is considering the viability of a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP)ordinance and land development regulations that: 1. identify, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway network shown on the County's Long Range Transportation Plan Board approved development agreements, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, plans and programs; and *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** �. All of the above must be consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and/or other similar Board approved studies, agreements, plans and programs, and Chapter 336.02, Florida Statutes. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 5.5: [Revised text, page 17] Commercial developments within the South US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification to the Department County transportation planning agency that at least four of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized: *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Residential developments within the South US 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation shall provide documentation to the Transportation Planning Section that at least three 1`) of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized: a) Including neighborhood commercial uses within a residential project. b) Providing transit shelters within the development ( in coordination with Collier County Area Transit). c) Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities with connections to adjacent commercial properties. d) Vehicular access to adjacent commercial properties with shared commercial and residential parking. An applicant seeking an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation through the certification mentioned above shall submit an application to the _ _ _• DRAFT Words underlined are added;words strums are deleted.Page las of !' 3 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12113/16 County transportation planning agency on forms provided by the Division agency. Binding commitments to utilize any of the above techniques relied upon to obtain certification shall be required as a condition of development approval. Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three (3) years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three (3) years of development if they are deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be made within this second three year period and subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment shall be completed within three fl years and in three (3) year increments until the TDM strategies are deemed effective. Policy 5.6: The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that provide multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in this Transportation Element, and Policies 4,3 1.5.A and 4-4 1.5.B of this the Capital Improvement Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are designated: A. Northwest TCMA—This area is bounded by the Collier—Lee County Line on the north side; the west side of the 1-75 right-of-way on the east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side; and, the Gulf of Mexico on the west side (Map TR-5). B. East Central TCMA — This area is bounded by Pine Ridge Road on the north side; Collier Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side, and; Livingston Road (extended) on the west side (Map TR-6). In order to be exempt from link-specific concurrency, developments within the TCMA must provide documentation to the Transportation Planning Department that at least two (2) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies utilized meet the criteria of the LDC. Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three (3) years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three (3) years of development if they are deemed ineffective, Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be made within this second three year period and subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment shall be completed within three (3) years and in three year increments until the TQM strategies are deemed effective. Policy 5.7: Each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards described in Policies 4-:3 1.5.A and 4-4 1.5.B of this the Capital Improvement Element. ** **+ * * *#* **# text break Policy 6.1: [Revised text, page 19] The Transportation Element shall incorporate to the greatest degree possible, the long range plans of the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization. *** **+ * ** text break Policy 11.3: [Revised text, page 24] The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has assisted... DRAFT Words underlined are added;words struck are deleted.Page 6( ofa 4 Staff Proposed GMP Amendments TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT—BCC Transmittal Draft 12/13/16 *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 12.1: [Revised text, page 24] The Collier try Metropolitan Planning Organization, through the Transportation Disadvantaged Program shall assist... Policy 12.2: The County Transportation Division and the Collier Cly Metropolitan Planning Organization shall coordinate... *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** Tables /Maps / Figures [Updated maps, following TE text] Transportation Map Series, maps TR— 1 through TR—6, TR—8. *** *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** *** [Include the actual updated maps labeled as, and included in, this Exhibit "A".] PLEASE NOTE: Approval of amendments to this Element is intended to confer the Board's consent to make similar and related changes in references or cross-references to Objectives, Policies and other formal terms where re-formatting creates new or re-numbers Objectives, Policies and terms, wherever they appear—within and between Elements—as appropriate to maximize internal consistency. Approval is also intended to confer- the Board's consent to make similar and related changes to un-adopted portions of the document. DRAFT Words underlined are added;words stack-through are deleted. Page,,, (of 5 • 4 r • 0 wcr xi q ww y IK t1 a + - x a.Ln o; c n n I z n 3? I I !s V p' Q174 w _1 ea nsalsoawl a w( Z (,101S- rl ct - m 46 1 _e 6 0 8 2 �- /tb T Ckid NPNIe 33L1310000ft/ I t r N 1 / ID b0 L1182130FN71 IOULP SMC' OR LU CO i Z K / I G U' u 2 W -.I T ( ' 0 .Ls 1st LL 2 Z a S'I m LL a Nw I, af0+ ~ w a. m 1 L - r, i. T J 7L Q <.-------. n w r 1S'144 -- 5 Z e¢0 g I e II I• i i VV//rn II!! )tuI . „.... ... "—Di=NII A1N1500 a - rt 5 13 m 8 zea I w > m d Q .� ,E'f a V co al : WWW Q' IIco m N u '- r -1 W z CL a, 1../ CD 2 a o / I .. L a' a o e AllaiMM 0 a . a ' m .0 of for/ c a: o. ® 4042 - 0 e S J 0 to, Ai ' (...,,-0( ' .. 41 z gTey` .....`4-ii �} rir ' 4z. ..... G ti W - , ,... I.v..a —J I - - W CD in 1 W page W ° Fes., _ ,.o of - On , („J a c ` MIS M3(11D� ammj8p m ft 3 21 r'l - l'" ..r.----- ‘ ..,.. Lu .../ ` ? � 1 1 t1 W x Qas�iBJ V1ry11 Z tialsn �Ll ¢ 5 ON 014 . =- 9Nt-nnd modlW a i ti O o . 6 O It etNN / vVtltll 3310009.._. „ . ®'1tlZ WMtlNY1Q F CD [i]g '' 1, NO 1116}13Q outs stiORE Cle il! m Ca !I ( U 7. W CO , i y m v >? Q y • islets F s c it n m 3 Em Ci i r __ - .__-' g3 �'. 1S.,.151 t v .� c p i X d m` 4" f -1 i n v m o 8 o 11n, • * „ mill �� V Z t � Wt 4 p 4 66 k t " t ,i- ( i �— UN Mil iLLe11103 1.0' 4.)F 7 IS m pCC ' 0 O L! 4 0 O ( I il W W K ® , VI) W °m o . 4F[ 4 L* ✓ Z Q ] C• ilii SCp c 5 A L a � a 4 3 011' 12 p�.0 t•1 s t L C li. t 2� m a . C Z a O' s� c �� ' 03. 1ea d z-.. ®� ~ <6 Z T s+ ,,Or - • CR N N * 4 z l __ x 9 W i H '' N 9 rikiLw,VIWVI Wm W Page 4,1 of -- f M mri i • ii i° o $. Q3 i o M 2 1 w •me 1 » o UUf I111 2 ill em • 1Ii 00 I z k.......�. . . w..........o....r..........r .�..�x�.� ., �uNrwa MANN a 11O ILLNfl03 x�moO . V OG 1.11I i 0 V I th ctm i i a. 0 �_ m M =!l m ti P Z OC It i g vi F- r? 2 illni , ci g LI. 1 r J LIJ 4". t11' Mt a C ta :rr � _ • O MIM:i {J 141 — i , UM_, i 5 i * M ■ 0 I .-1 El E... , ._,,,..,1 - F 1 ` ' ai 'ti ` .. ' '' j II . is ---- i . ..114l...'.e..••••••• C3 ILI U. 1,P,'" ,. t 3' e' 1 Page 1 o r M j t III N II 1 i 1 I ° _ 111111 ; 111 If II 1 t i L Z J M Z aO CO o U N n W Z �� l' or u3rrw3 LIr a. co us ni CO CC WSC Iii a a r c H a t r ; Q `, ¢Z GA1®NVOOI r 0 m 01 W Q G akin W 'P J CO _ 0 Z I- Al i td, . V a6 sxvo 6 m I! ! 6 ow mann I au .. ujxi. .:1 1 g iZ d pell i WO rIau3cNVA Z U. 5.4 ILI CI O. U. d I1 a 7 w N s 1 i g 1 i 4. . W N LL e II 8 ., iiiiii ' g I HI ao " t w Z O u ac W J 0 v VII W 0 0 i M .. CO ra ao aZ < n wm 04 z 0 I-- G cg 0 Dina s3Or1omm3 0 Z Oj W O S 0 g i i - - i u 0 1 a 0 ON 331101011111Z Q _ 6 Call NWZM U. J LL P ALNf1OO d3f1O3 e A.N11O3 331 PagerobT ` I 1 i i i 11 b li li el 1 11 N s iila E = ► i M 1119 I ill 00 1 1 11 11 m 5 z z 0 u w 3 S a.ft o � 13 2 5 "---, et W S W Z � W 01 H J 2z 2 Q / — ....... Om gygm firm U. ra: o Er ' u W J W I n I Y J 52. � � \ Page=of r 1 Sim I Hrii li II CZ co N cg 0 rA WI MI a. 11 a i -''''' I 6 12 ,11 ! ssi i 11 m li o o ! II D0g PI t 11. ' 5z - .z u W o‘....m'D - 8, J m 1 W 0. C in O m �; 'tea le Em an JI''Pvidi a u3mo� z` 2 m ,,, ,,Li ...... ._. qo OMe NVDo1wAte rareare VJNVS i.. r o ,7, si _ LT. U 4 u 1 til OH rwtsnll :11.111.1.1.1.1g V° 1.111.1.1.1.1 ► .a s a z giiii Oa ONrri ld LHOdlNY n Pr , z U. Id=V10000 10000 aTar— ,,,,,, .a , , „ 4 t r Page 4 of_4_4.41 II in ri I N-r-l' . n I I i 111i O „ " ��r ra ... y0J 9 - AI it - elliii I II { 111111 ; 111111 M ill 0i 1 11 1 11 1 " t z Z a V W 71 J a 0 V au S aC a. 04 Q in wig oz ac oc � arw$aT1Q3 p Z• a �> NO 131111 p p P a r 4 ' '� ae1 warn=II d� Q NI\ z o fl u a QU.la.ri WW ta. ..• Page of 4- 17 I • ., 1 1 , , i \ g cf -.. q - ‘ 5,- .--- - ----, ) , 7 _._ t: ' r..,...8 ai– 1 _ LA , : II V3 ' a) c ti_. -. -- r - 1 I ,' 1 , ',( )111111411n11 )- 1 ‘ ed!i i i§ , .... a., ) I , ..,„e 7,1„, - I i ' *".1 sk2 COUNTY BARN RD IIIHIlliffili 1 — (- -1 , I , ) c, i i F ,--g I 1 ) ,,,."2t i . 6 I / . 1 i i i ..at— F.Z1 1 irt 4 A E , x _ I Iti .fte, C•4 GI — , I - i , 1 , — i _ fl) e Ix 8 I:4 Z 1 i • _ ' Mil 'pH1 1 , 71 , ,„, i''') ca) Zig 1 r) 1 TT) ] ilisJ , , g Ko. I e, ( ,-,,, ,,..., w, 1....03 ° Wu 1 1 ,s,`: _ , , . _ . 1 __, /61/ , lir 1 --- ; 1 ..,..., '' ....... i — - 0 a - - I ,IIL 11,40 _„ , C o ,--1 . ,z) o': '0' s A.. — 0 1 1 = t...4 t•-• 0. , ci\ ciei t _ #_-,. z;* ,.i -4 AI , -- 0 le t Ime t _ j i / 1. * , ,./ ` ve,<-1 , 1 , _ _ i I lik.''' -- i '' ---- ki 11,-' 1 , - ... , - a 4 1 f 1 li ,q,141A1-P,,P1:1. CZr12zO3 –i1 1 i rzt W C. Mr X Ma_ii_.....Ji • ii,:it I- __ ..1, • iii 4- iis'i= GO )01 14_AIRPORT PUti_LING'17.r-Viciii, PL 1 " 1 i M u I,- _, I, ,.,._ a urdiFit,, 44 '4 , - i 1 NC C # BAysHoRE DR I 4+ g I 1 6 , _11. ". `• 16°' i i i S 3 , ,:..., - ,_ .,..„. ,,,..., . I., ... ..,:, , , i , le I ._ Hill for , I, i -- - - I I ' /° 5/ i 1, \ N iti 1 eg 1 1 •- Z 666.6.66. tft I i 1 t il 111 ii ' I 1 ' z to) E 1111111 i (c5 1 t _ ‘ cn a 1 0 ii i 1- - i , CI i I- 1 . % \I it - i -I LI U I , 4 EION II I Page.,7kei ?i : I 4 w Ii 'k;.�filf PAM 19 t . 1, 11 Z + t 1 • f a5' I �Y Q s i i a W ! — N0A18NY OI s W IN 1 t y . , .., f 'd ' in - ,t 1` 2 i I I 4* _1 " 108 NOlSONIAII p 41 a. a k ellEN DNIll(ld 12IOdlJV cc C t 4, , \ a d IL U H iii , e W A 2' A0 �r )INtli�-311.310OOJ ` a .e Q L_Ir a c sb 1070\ N ge N 1>:IfTh9Wb'1 'o z P H 4 a CO toal 23 [T01 : NHA S ''1 i x CO U m H Z O., ,m. d _U W C`44 1 .0.4 GuLF Uf 0E00 z N If i m 0 AELw- Y f l ' ii i tn 28g0i l 0 I 100 III 1 P e of= • ___ , o it, 41111- e N ii l Lo•2 U �' a 0 i $ x a In �' i\ a CNI ci I 1 , c GA19y N;13 111OO imkAi) 1 � - _ .,' r ,r--„ _ II • `,' _ II�I A um ai Igl r fol I it r\2 — '4Y J11^.1 Ix II AI IlI a 1 y 1N6 ` il: Ii es- a { `, Q w �-_ Y o 2 i � , I ; Ix lu � 1 , ,' c Io .' iOnl3 VHVEllib9 d1NVS I- f o1aI , 0I �_ _� = II 1 . - c - . I t . IIIi III I i ° I ,qp ISI 1� p -_ L. I I it 2 I�` -1=-' I � ' _ , 1 I , _' . II ,II �„0 al, - @ h" . Ch RI C IL _ 11till_ 1.,- � h 11 I I III- i '� � I( } 4/111 CC w Oa NOISONIAll 1 9 m [ { A W IX r 1 I Z _ 1. ' , ' cii Ille Oa ONnlnd flIOi�alt� ' ; I a 1 f. IA a 11 ii\ \ th ' J 11a - ; a/ GN 31310000 ® II Page of EXHIBIT'A' PL20130002637-CPSP-2013-11 TR - 8 SIS Facilities Map - FDOT District A 1 eel, 1j�+`- N - District. 7 `\ct. � Vill ` i In Clem vitl. .� fllikaklk District: 5 ) \ it kik° az SIS Seapo2 rl.ur)1 Pp1�i F. EMERGING SIS ��1 W Free Ateneree \L.._® SIS el SIS Freight Terminal EMERGING SIS i Tu Sarasota/8►adenton Sts International Altport SIS AirportGI 111646k_ 0—_ EMERGING SIS ! I ril 'y� g �,,, SIS , ' ,► District: 1 .. SIS Passenger TerminalCiAL EMERGING SIS r di al SIS LeeCTrann Interrnodai ,_ SIS Highway Centro(Fort Myers},' • SIS Highway Corridor , Southwest Florida 5 international Airport Emerging SIS Highway Corridor —I SIS Highway Connector '8 , p 0 4ilims Military Access Facility .116 SIS Railway s • EMERGING SIS - --I-- SIS SIS Waterway EMERGING SIS .'a ..sem SIS 1 FDOT D1 '\t District: 6 1 Other FDOT Districts County Boundary 0 12.5 25 50 Miles FDOT:`�`15 Fectlitles 2014 I I i i I r i i I Mit City Bounds ,basemap 2015 > Ad Proof ? apLrG BJaiL News Sales Rep:Ivonne Gori(N9103) Phone:(239)262-3161 Email:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com Account lntbrnlation IIIMMEIN Date: 11/08/16 This is a proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates indicated below. Account Number:506365(N068778) Please confirm placement prior to deadline by contacting your account rep at(239)262-3161 . Company Name:BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV Ad Id: 1352287 P.O.No.:45-172052 Total Cost:$417.31 Contact Name: Email:martha.vergara@collierclerk.com Tag Line:NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is h Address:3299 TAMIAMI TRL E#700,NAPLES,FL,34112 Start Date:11/23/16 Stop Date: 11/23/16 Phone:(239)774-8049 Fax:(239)774-6179 Number of Times: 1 Class: 16180-Notice Publications:ND-Naples Daily News,ND-Internet-naplesnews.com I agree this ad is accurate and as ordered. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners will hold a public hearing on Tuesday,December 13,2016 in the Board of County Commissioners Chamber,Third Floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 E.Tamiami Trail, Naples,FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING COUNTY-INITIATED AMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN,ORDINANCE 89.05,AS AMENDED, TO AMEND THE AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN OVERLAY WITHIN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO PROVIDE FOR AN AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.032(3) FLORIDA STATUTES; AND TO UPDATE AND CLARIFY TEXT AND CORRECT MAP ERRORS AND OMISSIONS SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES;GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT TO REMOVE THE DISCHARGE RATES; TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES;AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT;AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY.[PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the Zoning Division,Comprehensive Planning Section,2800 N.Horseshoe Dr.,Naples,between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.,Monday through Friday.Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Suite#401 Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Section of the Zoning Division.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Tuesday,December 13,2016 will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person withadisability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,youare entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#101,Naples,FL 34112- 5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days priorto the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA DONNA FIALA,CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK By: Teresa Cannon,Deputy Clerk(SEAL) November 23,2016 No.1352287 Thank you for your business. Our commitment to a quality product includes the advertising in our publications. As such,Gannett reserves the right to cat- egorize,edit and refuse certain classified ads.Your satisfaction is important. If you notice errors in your ad,please notify the classified department immedi- ately so that we can make corrections before the second print date. The number to call is 239-263-4700. Allowance may not be made for errors reported past the second print date.The Naples Daily News may not issue refunds for classified advertising purchased in a package rate;ads purchased on the open rate may be pro-rated for the remaining full days for which the ad did not run. ?ipL % b ,,,,cz:., apiesN ws.cc m Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples,in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida,that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County,Florida,and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV 1271765 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA 45-161981 Pub Dates September 30,2016 (9 c)• a r. -c o. ©. u1 ` 4 0 - Q -:,= •I. i , 5© • • m . ' u Gy ....1.-.;t9 ec e•.".4.:;77---- (Sign ure of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me �,,,., 34`, IVONNE GOBI OA Notary Public•state of Florida This October ,2016 • a Commission •FF 900870 ~ -r.�nes My Comm.Expires Jul 18,2019 �ry t ' t ''- Boded throe National Notary Am. (Signatur of affiant) 4 > Ad Proof 3aiL ?.two Sales Rep:Ivonne Gori(N9103) Phone:(239)262-3161 Email:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com Account Information Date:09/15/16 This is a proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates indicated below. Account Number:506365(N068778) Please confirm placement prior to deadline by contacting your account Company Name:BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV rep at(239)262-3161 . Ad Id: 1271765 P.O.No.:45-161981 Total Cost:$405.37 Contact Name: Email:martha.vergara@collierclerk.com Tag Line:NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is h Address:3299 TAMIAMI TRL E#700,NAPLES,FL,34112 Start Date:09/30/16 Stop Date:09/30/16 Phone:(239)774-8049 Fax:(239)774-6179 Number of Times: 1 Class: 16250-Public Notices Publications:ND-Naples Daily News,ND-Intemet-naplesnews.com I agree this ad is accurate and as ordered. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING �• Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission sitting as the local planning agency and the Environmental Advisory Council,will hold a public meeting on Thursday,October 20,2016 at 9:00 A.M.in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples,FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING COUNTY-INITIATED AMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN,ORDINANCE 89-05,AS AMENDED,TO AMEND THE AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN OVERLAY WITHIN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO PROVIDE FOR A VARIANCE PROCEDURE FOR ESSENTIAL SERVICES TO THE STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN,AND TO UPDATE AND CLARIFY TEXT AND CORRECT MAP ERRORS AND OMISSIONS SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT;FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES;GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT TO REMOVE THE DISCHARGE RATES; TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES;AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT;AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY.[PL20130002637/CPSP-2013.11] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division,Comprehensive Planning Section,2800 N.Horseshoe Dr.,Naples,between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.,Monday through Friday.Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office,fourth floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Suite#401 Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Section of the Zoning Division.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thursday,October 20,2016, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. __.... _.. _. If you area person with adisabilitywho needs anyaccommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite#101,Naples,FL 34112- 5356,(239)2524380,at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Mark P.Strain,Chairman Collier County Planning Commission Collier County,FL September 30,2016 No.1271765 Thank you for your business. Our commitment to a quality product includes the advertising in our publications. As such,Gannett reserves the right to cat- egorize,edit and refuse certain classified ads.Your satisfaction is important. If you notice errors in your ad,please notify the classified department immedi- ately so that we can make corrections before the second print date. The number to call is 239-263-4700. Allowance may not be made for errors reported past the second print date.The Naples Daily News may not issue refunds for classified advertising purchased in a package rate;ads purchased on the open rate may be pro-rated for the remaining full days for which the ad did not run. . 1 x1A%. npletfri ro:, '4 Ntwu ANCRUL. HaptesNews.com Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee Before the undersigned they serve as the authority personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples;in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida,and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida,each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement;and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Aa Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV 1098071 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEA 45-161981 Pub Dates May 27,2016 P . - r r t_ r-r `— tP o L! — C 1 fUt•,'Y �•! — (Sign ure of affiant) ,M•ta Sworn to and subscribed before me ,"�+Y•,,,y IYONNE CORI This lune 03, 16 1' = Notary Public•State or nada • • I Commission r FF 900e10 .,.^- # My Comm.Expires July 16,2019 •r[��('.�,jf/� r-• 41a & woo though Nauorui Notary Assn. ate,-' - " lir v 'r ai {Signatu of affSant) 4, > Ad Proof ?iapirs Ar Batill NrilIS ,Sales Rep:Ivonne Gori(N9103) Phone:(239)262-3161 Email:ivonne.gori@naplesnews.com Account Information ' 1111=11=111 Date:05/19/16 This is a proof of your ad scheduled to run on the dates indicated below. Account Number:506365(N068778) Please confirm placement prior to deadline by contacting your account Company Name:BCC/COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING DEV rep at(239)262-3161 . Ad Id:1098071 P.O.No.:45-161981 Total Cost:$405.37 Contact Name: Email:martha.vergara@collierclerk.com Tag Line:NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is h l Address:3299 TAMIANII TRL E#700,NAPLES,FL,34112 Start Date:05/27/16 Stop Date:05/27/16 Phone:(239)774-8049 Fax:(239)774-6179 Number of Times:1 Class: 16250-Public Notices Publications:ND-Naples Daily News,ND-Internet-naplesnews.com VERIMMII I agree this ad is accurate and as ordered. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission sitting as the local planning agency and the , Environmental Advisory Council,will hold a public meeting on Thursday,June 16,2016 at 9:00 A.M.in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,County Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples,FL The purpose of the hearing is to consider: A RESOLUTION OFTHE BOARD OFCOUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING COUNTY-INITIATED AMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89.05,AS AMENDED,PRIMARILY TO UPDATE AND CLARIFY TEXT AND CORRECT MAP ERRORS AND OMISSIONS SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT;FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP;STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SUB-ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT TO REMOVE THE DISCHARGE RATES;TRANSPORTATION ELEMENTANDTRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES;AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY.[PL201300g2637/CPSP-2013-11] All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION(S)will be made available for inspection at the GMD Zoning Division,Comprehensive Planning Section,2800 N.Horseshoe Dr.,Naples,between the hours of 8:e A.M.and lb MondaythroughFriday.tiFuat ermorer COO 4-0 JtJly 07) ZQ 163 the materials will be made available for the Collier Q� I County Clerk's Office,Fourth Floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 401 Naples,one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Any questions pertaining to the documents should be directed to the Comprehensive Planning Section of the Zoning Division.Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thursday,June 16,2016,will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,he will need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any ' accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, youare entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101, Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioner's Office. Mark P.Strain,Chairman �'%\ Collier County Planning Commission Collier County,FL May 27,2016 No.1098071 Thank you for your business. Our commitment to a quality product includes the advertising in our publications. As such,Journal Media Group reserves the right to categorize,edit and refuse certain classified ads.Your satisfaction is important. If you notice errors in your ad,please notify the classified depart- ment immediately so that we can make corrections before the second print date. The number to call is 239-263-4700. Allowance may not be made for errors reported past the second print date.The Naples Daily News may not issue refunds for classified advertising purchased in a package rate;ads purchased on the open rate maybe pro-rated for the remaining full days for which the ad did not run. RESOLUTION NO. 16- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROPOSING COUNTY-INITIATED AMENDMENTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, ORDINANCE 89-05, AS AMENDED, TO AMEND THE AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN OVERLAY WITHIN THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO PROVIDE FOR AN AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 380.032(3) FLORIDA STATUTES; AND TO UPDATE AND CLARIFY TEXT AND CORRECT MAP ERRORS AND OMISSIONS SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES; GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUB- ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT TO REMOVE THE DISCHARGE RATES; TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT AND TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES; AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. [PL20130002637/CPSP-2013-11 ] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10,1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Collier County staff has prepared amendments to the following elements of its Growth Management Plan: Conservation and Coastal Management Element; Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series; Golden Gate Area Master Plan Future Land Use Map; Storm water Management Sub-Element of the Public Facilities Element; Transportation Element and Transportation Map Series; [15-CMP-00954] 317 Batch #2 GMP Transmittal Amendments 10/24/16 Page 1 of3 Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions