Agenda 12/13/2016 Item #16G316.G.3
12/13/2016
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the attached Resolution and Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
between the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (Board) and the Southwest Florida
Regional Planning Council (RPC) to form a Brownfield Assessment Coalition to apply for grant
funds from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Brownfields Assessment Grant
Program.
OBJECTIVE: To form a Brownfields Assessment Coalition with the goal of obtaining US
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) grant funding to identify and address potential brownfield sites
within the Southwest Florida (SWFL) Promise Zone regions of Hendry, Glades, and Collier Counties.
CONSIDERATIONS: The RPC is forming a Coalition and compiling grant application materials to
inventory, characterize, assess, and conduct planning for sites within the SWFL Promise Zone that may
be contaminated by hazardous substances. If sites are determined to be contaminated, additional EPA
funding will be pursued through a separate grant program to perform cleanup and remediation activities.
Other counties within Southwest Florida have expressed interest in joining this Coalition to strengthen
their funding potential. EPA funds could benefit potential contaminated areas within the geographic
boundaries of the Immokalee Regional Airport, which was designated as a Brownfield via Board
Resolution No. 04-82 in accordance with the Brownfields Redevelopment Act.
The RPC has requested Collier County consideration and approval of a Memorandum of Understanding
and Resolution expressing Collier County's interest in pursuing this joint venture, which aims to
encourage new private sector capital investment for returning impacted properties to future alternative
reuse, aid in the creation of new jobs in Collier County and enrich the tax base of the community.
If the grant is awarded, the RPC will administer the program and procure environmental consultants to
perform testing and planning. There is an option for the RPC to provide sub -grants to Collier County to
cover staff time spent on coordinating related activities and other administrative tasks. It will be the
responsibility of Collier County to obtain all required permits, easements and access agreements as may
be necessary to undertake assessments at the Airport.
The Board may elect to withdraw from this MOU by providing sixty (60) days written notice to other
parties, but shall continue to be bound by the terns of the grant.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no Fiscal Impact associated with this Executive Summary.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact associated with the
Executive Summary.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved for form and legality and requires a majority vote
for Board approval. - JAB
RECOMMENDATION: To approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Resolution and
Memorandum of Understanding between Collier County and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning
Council to submit a grant application to the EPA for technical assistance and Brownfield site assessments.
Prepared by: Justin Lobb, Airports Manager, Airport Authority
Packet Pg. 2228
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. MOU_Brownfield Coalition (PDF)
2. Resolution—Brownfield Coalition Grant App (PDF)
3. Brownfield Back -Up Email (PDF)
4. IMM Airport BCC Resolution 04-82 (PDF)
5. NOFO EPA OLEM OBLR 16-18 Due 12.20.16 (PDF)
6. Brownfield Area (PDF)
1:6.G.3
12/13/2016
Packet Pg. 2229
16G.3
12/13/2016
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 16.G.3
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the attached Resolution and Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) and the
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council to form a Brownfields Assessment Coalition to apply for
grant funds from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Brownfields Assessment Grant
Program.
Meeting Date: 12/13/2016
Prepared by:
Title: Operations Coordinator — Airport Authority
Name: Debra Brueggeman
12/06/2016 10:52 AM
Submitted by:
Title: Division Director - Operations Support — Growth Management Department
Name: Gene Shue
12/06/2016 10:52 AM
Approved By:
Review:
Airport Authority
Growth Management Department
Growth Management Department
Growth Management Department
County Attorney's Office
Office of Management and Budget
Budget and Management Office
County Attorney's Office
Grants
County Manager's Office
Board of County Commissioners
Justin Lobb
Additional Reviewer
Gene Shue
Additional Reviewer
Diane Lynch
Level 1 Division Reviewer
David Wilkison
Level 2 Division Administrator
Jennifer Belpedio
Level 2 Attorney of Record Review
Valerie Fleming
Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review
Ed Finn
Additional Reviewer
Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review
Therese Stanley
Additional Reviewer
Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review
MaryJo Brock
Meeting Pending
Completed
12/06/2016 10:56 AM
Completed
12/06/2016 1:10 PM
Completed
12/06/2016 2:10 PM
Completed
12/06/2016 2:35 PM
Completed
12/06/2016 4:01 PM
Completed
12/07/2016 9:23 AM
Completed
12/07/2016 9:29 AM
Completed
12/07/2016 10:01 AM
Completed
12/07/2016 10:29 AM
Completed
12/07/2016 1:10 PM
12/13/2016
9:00 AM
Packet Pg: 2230
16.G.3.a
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING BROWNFIELDS
ASSESSMENT COALITON FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ASSESSMENT GRANT BETWEEN SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING
COUNCIL AND COLLIER COUNTY
This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is entered into this day of
December, 2016 between the COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS ("Collier County"), organized and existing under the laws of the state of
Florida ("County") and the SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL,
an intergovernmental agency created pursuant to Section 186.504, F.S., and identified in Rule
29-I, FAC. ("SWFRPC"). All parties are collectively referred to as the "Parties" or "Coalition
o
Partners or Partners ".
WHEREAS, the Coalition Partners are the Collier County Board of County
0
Commissioners, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council and counties within the
ad
M
Southwest Florida Promise Zone;
WHEREAS, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, permits governmental units to enter into
w
Interlocal Agreements to make the most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to
c
cooperate with one another on a basis of mutual advantage; and
2
WHEREAS, each of the Parties has determined that it is in the best interests of the
3
residents of the Parties' respective jurisdictions that they enter into this Agreement to form a
o
Brownfield Assessment Coalition in order to be eligible to apply for funding opportunities from
0°
the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Brownfields Assessment Grant Program (the
Ln"--
Grant); and
FSL
WHEREAS, the purpose of this MOU is to set forth the general intentions of the parties
regarding the EPABrownfields Assessment Grant Program.
1. General Terms: The Coalition Partners hereto incorporate and set forth the
following ideas in order to further the mutual goal of assessing brownfields:
a. Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council shall apply for the Grant and shall
act to coordinate the sub -recipient awards.
b. If the Grant is awarded the parties shall each enter into a sub -recipient agreement
with each of the Counties so that the SWFRPC may award the grant money to the
local governments.
c. Activities funded through the sub -recipient agreement may include inventory
preparation, site selection criteria development, assessments, planning (including
cleanup planning) relating to Brownfield sites, outreach materials and
implementation, and other eligible activities. The SWFRPC may retain
consultant(s) and contractors to undertake various activities funded through the
cooperative agreement and may award sub -grants to other Coalition Partners
under 40 CFR 31.37 for assessment projects in their geographic areas. Sub -
Page 1 of 4
Packet Pg 2231
16.G.3.a
grantees are accountable to the SWFRPC for proper expenditure of all grant
funds.
d. SWFRPC shall coordinate with the County in whose geographic area the site is
located to finalize the scope -of -work for the consultant or contractor. It will be
the responsibility of this Partner to obtain all required permits, easements, and
access agreements as may be necessary to undertake assessments at the selected
site. If this Partner does not have the capacity to perform these activities, the
SWFRPC may assist in securing necessary site access agreements and permits.
e. SWFRPC, in consultation with Partners, will work to develop a site selection
process based on agreed-upon. Selected sites will be submitted to EPA for prior
approval to ensure eligibility.
f. SWFRPC and Partners shall share responsibility for ensuring that the other
activities as negotiated in the work plan, such as community outreach and
involvement, are implemented in accordance with a schedule agreed upon by the
SWFRPC and the Partners in whose geographic area the sites to be assessed are
located.
2. Termination—A party may withdraw from this MOU by providing sixty (60) days
written notice to the other parties, but shall continue to be bound by the terms of the
Grant.
3. Third Party Beneficiaries - This agreement does not create any relationship with, or
any rights in favor of, any third party.
4. Severability - If any provision of this agreement is declared void by a court of law,
all other provisions will remain in full force and effect.
5. Non Waiver - The failure of any party to exercise any right in this agreement shall
not be considered a waiver of such right.
6. Governing Law and Venue - This agreement is governed in accordance with the
laws of the State of Florida. Venue shall be in Lee County.
7. Sovereign Immunity - Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted as a waiver of
the sovereign immunity doctrine enjoyed by each party hereto.
8. Attachments - All exhibits attached to this agreement are incorporated into and made
part of this agreement by reference.
9. Amendments - The parties may amend this agreement only by mutual written
agreement of the parties.
10. Captions and Section Headings - Captions and section headings used herein are for
convenience only and shall not be used in construing this Agreement.
Page 2 of 4 n
Packet Pg. 2232
11. Construction - This agreement shall not be construed more strictly against one party
than the other(s) merely by virtue of the fact that it may have been prepared by one of
the parties. It is recognized that all parties have substantially contributed to the
preparation of this agreement.
12. Notice - For all purposes herein, notice shall mean written notice sent by certified
mail, return receipt requested, properly addressed and posted, or by commercial
courier service, to the addresses shown below. Notice shall be effective only upon
actual receipt by the addressee, but written response to or acknowledgment of a notice
received shall constitute a waiver of any defect in the manner notice was given. A
copy of every notice given under this Agreement must be sent to the other Parties, the
Administrator and to the Chair \of the governing body. Notices required or permitted
under this Agreement shall be delivered to:
If to SWFRPC:
Margaret Wuerstle
Executive Director
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council
1400 Colonial Blvd.
Suite 1
Fort Myers, FL 33907
(239) 938-1813
If to County of Collier:
Justin Lobb
Airport Manager
Collier County Airport Authority
2005 Mainsail Drive, Suite 1
Naples, FL 34114
(239)642-7878
13. Recording of Agreement. The Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, upon
execution of this agreement by all parties, shall record this MOU in the public records
of Lee County, Florida.
14. Entire Agreement - This agreement constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes
all prior written or oral agreements, understandings, or representations.
c
0
0
0
a�
0
c
0
0
L)
�a
d
c
0
CO
LO ^
Lr
N
Page 3 of 4 n
Packet Pg. 2233,,
EXECUTED AND ATTESTED ON THE DATES BELOW WRITTEN:
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
In
ATTEST:
Margaret Wuerstle, Executive Director
Jason Stoltzfus, Promise Zone Coordinator
ATTEST: COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
IIn
, DEPUTY CLERK
Approval for form and legality:
Jennifer A. Belpedio
Assistant County Attorney
DONNA FIALA, CHAIRMAN
16.G.3.a
Q
Page 4 of 4
Packet Pg 2234
16`.G.3.b
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,
AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT REQUEST, THROUGH SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, TO THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY FOR
g
FUNDING A BROWNFIELDS COALITION ASSESSMENT GRANT TO IDENTIFY AND ADDRESS
5
POTENTIAL BROWNFIELD SITES AND AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY COMMISSION
ai
CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE ANY OR ALL DOCUMENTS PERTAINING THERETO; PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
CdCd
O
WHEREAS, Collier County has experienced several years of commercial and residential
�
development and has been impacted, like many with conditions of blight due to age and neglect,
long-term decay and potential contamination from a wide variety of industrial, commercial and
o
transportation -related sources, and
v
WHEREAS, the identification of many of these impacted locations of concern are not known
2
to the community and should be identified in order to provide for environmental site assessments,
0
evaluations and for establishing corrective actions, remediation and economic incentives, and
m
WHEREAS, on March 23, 2004, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No.
ul
LO
le
04-82 designating Immokalee Airport lands as a brownfield area; and
54-
fl.
WHEREAS providing for an effective brownfield redevelopment strategy will encourage new
4�
�
private sector capital investment for returning impacted properties to future alternative reuse, aid in
the creation of new to Collier County jobs and enrich the tax base of the community specifically in
O
c
areas of economically distressed older development, and
0
WHEREAS, the US EPA provides Bug technical support and training to communities and
0
U
funding to identify and address potential brownfield assessments, clean-up and revitalization, and
CD
WHEREAS, other counties within Southwest Florida have indicated interest in joining with
0
o
the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council through a Coalition to seek funding to identify and
m
address potential brownfield sites and revitalization opportunities, and
I
o
;c
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
0
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
n
This body authorizes County staff to prepare and to submit an application, through the Southwest
Florida Regional Planning Council, to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's "Brownfield
Coalition Assessment Grant" program and receive funding to support site assessments, technical
assistance and to authorize the County Chairman to sign or execute all documents required.
Q
THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second, and majority vote favoring same this the
day of 201
(ab)
Racket Pg.2235
--- - -- — .........-
16.G3.b
ATTEST: COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
By:
By: DONNA FIALA, CHAIRMAN
DEPUTY CLERK
0
ch
CD
Approval for form and legality: w
cd
O
Jennifer A. Belpedio 2
c
Assistant County Attorney C�) �� O
U
C)
c
3
O
ML
W
Ul)
:ii
V
N
Q
w
C
CO
0
C
O
:s+
O
U
m
c
O
m
I
O
O
N
C
d
I✓
V
r
Q
Q
Packet Pg. 2236
16.G.3.c
LobbJustin
From: Jason Stoltzfus Ustoltzfus@swfrpc.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 4:26 PM
To: DurhamTim
Cc: LobbJustin; Margaret Wuerstle
Subject: Brownfields Assessment Application
Attachments: Brownfields Assessment Application Resolution - Collier County.docx; Brownfields
Assessment Coalition MOU - Collier County.docx; EPA Brownfields Assessment Grants
Funding Announcement. pdf
Ti m,
c
0
In follow-up to our discussion earlier today regarding an application that we're preparing for the EPA Brownfields 2
Assessments Grants program, I've attached the MOU that we would need to provide with the application as well as a d
sample resolution. W
As a quick summary, the purpose of this application is to pursue funding to inventory, characterize, assess, and conduct 0
planning (including cleanup planning) for sites that may be or are contaminated by hazardous substances. If sites are =
determined to be contaminated, we can then pursue EPA funding through a separate grant program to perform the
cleanup.
cc
0
U
This application will include the Promise Zone regions of Hendry/Glades counties and Immokalee as well as Collier :2
County. Hendry and Glades counties are in the process of getting the items on their BCC agendas as well. We would not
be limited to utilizing funds for the airport if the county would identify additional sites that they would like to have 3
0
tested. We (the RPC) will administer the program and procure environmental consultants to perform testing and m`
planning. Please note that there is an option included in the MOU for the RPC to provide sub -grants to Collier County to Ln'1
cover staff time spent on coordinating related activities as well as other administrative tasks. This probably won't be N
necessary but the option is there in case it is needed or wanted.
I've attached a copy of the funding announcement for the grant that outlines the purpose of the program in case you're Lu
interested in taking a look. Q-
Please let me know if you have any questions. I would be happy to meet with you or others to discuss the details if f°
m
additional information is needed. -a
m
w.
Thank you very much, hope you have a great Thanksgiving.
0
M
c
Jason Stoltzfus
E
Grant Program Manager, Promise Zone Coordinator =
Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council
ti
1400 Colonial Blvd, Suite 1, Fort Myers, FL 33907 G
239.938.1813 x241
941.666.3403 (Cell)
email: istoltzfusPswfrpc.or
web: www.swfrpc.orF-
Packet Pg. 2237
f
Y
psi .f F'.�t.•":`•�'�� `Z4
Syms. < N.G NY y4*7
16.G.3.c
LO
Ln
N
E
W
a
m
m
w
c
3
0
L
m
r_
CD
V
w
Q
Packet Pg. 2238
COLLIER COUNTY
FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT
July 8, 2004
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104 • (239) 403-2330 • Fax (239) 403-2331
Mr. Roger B. Register, B,•ownfieids Liaji on ;
Department of En•/ironmental Protectier
C y.
Bureau of Waste Cleanup
M.S. 4505 309 M c s
2600 Blair Stone ;toad
Tallahassee, Fl. 32399-2400
Subject: Immokalee, Fl. Erownfields Area Resolution; and State Designation -
Dear Mr. Register:
On March 23, 2004, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, in accordance
with Sections 376.77 through 376.85, Fla. Stat. (2003), adopted Resolution No. 04-81
(signed copy with description and map attached). This Resolution designated the
Immokalee Airport lands as a statutory "brownfield area,'' as defined in § 776.79 (4).
The intent of this designation was to stimulate redevelopment within the designated area
through local and state economic incentives.
However, the mere designation of this brownfield area alone does not, and will not,
render Collier County liable for any costs of site rehabilitation or source removal, as
those terms are defined in §§ 376 79 (14) and (15).
Mr. Tim Billings of our Graphics Department has separately forwarded to you the legal
description and an electronic -format (shape file, of the Immokalee Airport.
Please confirm your receipt of this notification and the information from Mr. Billings and
advise if any additional,,information or clarification is required.
Respctfullly,
H. Dehton Baker, Director, Financial Administration and Housing
cc: James V. Mudd, County Manager
Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Comn;anity Development and Environmental
Services Division
Patrick G. White, Assistant County Attorney
Amy Patterson, impact Fee Manager
Arthur E. Lya!l, South District Brmvniieids Coordinator
Tim Billings, Graphics Supervicor
16.G.3.d
==i
c
0
0
aD
W
a'S
M
E0
C
0
M
0
U
c
0
M
LO
L0
N .00ft1
N
0
0
V
Packet Pg. 2239
RESOLUTION NO. 04-82 _
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MAKING FINDINGS;
DESIGNATING A BROWNFIELD AREA THAT IS WITHIN A
PORTION OF A" COLLIER ENTERPRISE ZONE AND DOES NOT
INCLUDE ANY AREA OUTSIDE THE GEOGRAPHIC
BOUNDARIES OF THE EM MOKALEE REGIONAL AIRPORT AND
ALL OF WHICH IS OWNED BY AND WITHIN COLLIER
COUNTY, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
REMEDIATION, IF NEEDED, AND FOR ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT OF THE DESIGNATED BROWNFIELD AREA;
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the State of Florida through Chapter 97-277, Laws of Florida, has
codified Sections 376.77 through 376.84, Florida Statutes, (`Brownflelds Redevelopment
Act") and has authorized this Board, by Board Resolution, to designate contiguous areas
consisting of one or more Brownfields sites as `Brownfields Areas" to facilitate
environmental remediation, if needed, and to facilitate economic development of such
Brownfield Area; and
WHEREAS, Collier County desires to notify the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection of this designation of this Brownfield Area, to facilitate
environmental remediation, if needed, and to facilitate economic development of such
area; and
�. WHEREAS, all of this designated Brownfield Area is within a portion of a
Collier County designated Enterprise Zone and no part of this Brownfield Area extends
beyond the geographic boundaries of the Immokalee Regional Airport, which airport is
owned by Collier County; and
WHEREAS, the designated Brownfield Area is land that was a Federal Military
Airport during World War II which included aircraft fueling facilities, buildings and
other structures to facilitate use of this Airport as that Military Airfield; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners perceives that development
and/or redevelopment of the subject designated Brownfield Area is being complicated by
actual or perceived environmental contamination within the intent of Florida's
Brownflelds Redevelopment Act; and
WHEREAS, the procedures set forth in Subsection 376.80(1), Florida Statutes,
have been followed, and proper notice has been provided in accord with Section 376.80
and Subsection 125.66 (4)(b)(2), Florida Statutes.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
Section I. The area depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto, all of which area is
within a Collier County Enterprise Zone and is wholly within the geographic boundaries
of the Immokalee Regional Airport, is hereby designated as a Brownfield Area for
environmental remediation, if needed, and for redevelopment purposes per Sections
16.G:3.d
0
0
N
d
a'S
0
0
0
0
v
a
m
�c
3
0
m`
In
W
N
a
0
r
0
0
0
a�
v
U
rfl
0
a
Q
c
E
r
U
Packet Pg. 2240
16.G.3.d
376.77 through 376.84Florida Statutes. This designation shall not render Collier County
liable for costs of site rehabilitation or source removal (as defined in Sections 376.77
through 376.84, Florida Statutes) nor for any other costs above and beyond such costs
otherwise attributable to the Collier County in its role as property owner of all of the
subject designated Brownfield Area.
Section 2. The County Manager shall notify the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, pursuant to Section 376.80, Florida Statutes, of this
Brownfield Area designation.
Section 3. Officers and employees of Collier County are hereby authorized to
do all things necessary and proper to carry out the intent and purposes of this Resolution.
Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
THIS RESOLUTION is adopted after motion, second, and majority vote favoring
adoption this day 2004.
ATTEST ,, ,••„"'.,,.• •,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT,'.k,t'lk[
COLLIER C UNTY, FLORIDA
,�lerk
By
By.
Attest'tp tr3�
ITC NA FIALA, Chairman
Uf'. y I y
ppr a 1e sufficiency:
e c 1 LOli't,F,
�ccni�:t c` WL' !"
Patrick
Patrick . • hit , Assistant County Attorney
NEREi37 'Wl?Trri' itis t!t': 13 t; HE Md
CGP� of 1.1
"'iti : i',:ttc ,,^s i F a_;L {i^:Cie
t'0illfrS OWE�aw'
'di=rtESS ; 31 fgsa
day of
DWIGHT E. BR . 0CK,PLE.IZk61• 043OUS
Item # 1 ri 6
Agenda 3 Z3 eJ
Date 1
I Date �y
� Reck
d4—
A)
3 a 0
Ciek
a
Packet Pg. 2241
IMMOKALEE REGIONAL AIRPORT
Short Legal Description:
03 47 29 N1/2 E OF DITCH EXC
DB 31 PG 135 & THAT PORTION OF
VACATED ED SCOTT IMMOKALEE
AIRPORT UNIT 2 RES 88-67
16.G3.d
Packet Pg 2242'
LO
et
N
co
4
O
C
O
O
N
O
U
U
L
O
CL
L
CQ
cC
C
W
r
a>
U
R
2
Packet Pg. 2243
r
16.G.3.d
IlNnOn GMVMOae UNnoD 30V0
S 9b1 I S 4v J 59b1 1 SGVI I 5051 1 Sl51 I 5251 1 5ES1
W
m
m
O
C
O
W d
N
m
C
O
r C
z O
W
w m R
O C 0
2
w
W C
0 0
m
� m
LO
Lf)
N
W N
m O
N �
� O
C
O
W 0
0
m a)
N EL'
� U
U
CD
Y
L
0
W
L
N
a
fr
w
C
W
S � �
C N U
� x
Q
ur
N
�! 8
�n
Packet Pg. 2244 -_ -
2
16.G.3.d
El
V
-- - Packet Pg. 2245 -
r
i 111-1 —.nua l.1NnoD 3CIVO
r
16.G.3.d
W
m
m
Ir
W
N
m
m
W
O
m
W
m
N
ge
W
m
N
m
W
n
N
w
s
W
N
S9b1 I SLbl I SBbl 1 5Sbl I 5051 I 5151 I 5251 I SESI
Packet Pg. 2246
4
16.G.3.d
O
O
O
O
SI
I�
O
O
Q
O
O
C
{8
T
t?
kit
CL
�q
CG
L
QI
I,tf
IP
m
LL
LU
p
SI
LZ
LL
QI
1
in
uj
SI
Vi
til
CL
7
N
r
CL
L
LL
U
LLJ11
LW
SI
J
�
4
,n
�77.1
U
07
f+
H
t�� I
�
L
LLJ
+4,Ity4
LII
IL�i
r N
T
T
O
W
—
� C
� m
Qi
tti
CL
cow+
>
C5
�y
LD
,v
to
L
J
16.G.3.d
(n
0
CIO
.E
L
0
O
CN
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q
O
O
C
{8
T
t?
kit
CL
4?
CG
m
LU
p
uj
N
r
�
y
O
07
f+
LU
tti
cow+
>
C5
�y
LD
,v
to
nen
LIS
T
d
C
(n
0
CIO
.E
L
0
O
CN
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q
O
O
C
{8
T
t?
kit
QS
{p
4?
CG
LU
r
�
y
L1.!
LU
Qy
cow+
>
C5
�y
LD
,v
to
tl
LO
LO
,
N
O
y
O
EZ'
U
U
m
v
Q
Packet Pg. 2247
16.G.3.e
OVERVIEW
AGENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)
TITLE:
FYI Guidelines for Brownfields Assessment Grants
ACTION:
Request for Proposals (RFP)
RFP NO:
EPA-OLEM-OBLR-16-08
CATALOG
OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE (CFDA) NO.: 66.818
DATES: The closing date and time for receipt of proposals is December 20, 2016, 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time (ET). Proposals must be submitted through www. rg ants_gov. Proposals received
after 11:59 ET on December 20, 2016 will not be considered. Please refer to Section IV.B., Due
Date and Submission Instructions, for further instructions.
SUMMARY: The Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act
("Brownfields Law", P.L. 107-118) requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to
publish guidance for grants to assess and clean up brownfield sites. EPA's Brownfields Program
provides funds to empower states, communities, tribes, and nonprofits to prevent, inventory,
assess, clean up, and reuse brownfield sites.
r` Under these guidelines, EPA is seeking proposals for Assessment Grants only. If you are
interested in requesting funding for Cleanup Grants, please refer to announcement EPA-OLEM-
OBLR-16-09 (Cleanup Grant Guidelines) posted separately on www.grants.gov and
www.gpa.gov/brownfields/qpply-brownfields-grant-ftindin .
Note: A solicitation for new Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) Grants will not be issued in FYI 7.
EPA expects to solicit requests from existing, high -performing RLF grantees for supplemental
funding through a Federal Register notice in early 2017.
For the purposes of these guidelines, the term "grant" refers to the cooperative agreement that
EPA will award to a successful applicant. Please refer to Section II.C. for a description of EPA's
anticipated substantial involvement in the cooperative agreements awarded under these
guidelines.
EPA urges applicants to review the Frequently Asked Questions, which can be found at
www gpa gov/sites/�roduction/files/2016-08/documents/fvl7 fags.pdf.
In addition, prior to naming a contractor or subawardee in your proposal, please carefully review
Section IV.E. of these guidelines.
FUNDING/AWARDS: The total funding available under the national competitions for
Assessment and Cleanup Grants is estimated at $54 million subject to the availability of funds
and other applicable considerations. EPA may expend up to 25 percent of the amount
Packet Pg. 2248
96.G.3.e
appropriated for Brownfields Grants on sites contaminated with petroleum. EPA anticipates
awarding an estimated 294 grants among assessment and cleanup grant types. Under this
competitive opportunity, EPA anticipates awarding an estimated 234 Assessment Grants for an
estimated $42 million.
CONTENTS BY SECTION
SECTION I. - FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION
2
........................................................4
I.A. Description of Grant
0
o
4
I.B. Uses of Grant Funds
d
......................................................
I.C. EPA Strategic Plan Linkage
�
°a
........................... ....................................................................8
I.D. Measuring Environmental Results: Anticipated Outputs/Outcomes
M
0
..................................9
I.E. Linking to HUD -DOT -EPA Partnership for Sustainable Communities, Sustainable and
Equitable Development Outcomes, and Supporting Environmental Justice .......................9
I.F. Regional Priorities.............................................................................................................11
SECTION II. - AWARD INFORMATION
0
U
...................................................................................15
II.A. What is the Amount of Available Funding?
:2
II.B. What is the Project Period for Awards Resulting from this Solicitation?
=
.......................15
ILC. Substantial Involvement
3
SECTION III. - ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION and THRESHOLD CRITERIA
0°
.....................16
IILA. Who Can Apply? ......................... 16
LO
III.B. Threshold Criteria for Assessment Grants..............
......................................
1. Applicant Eligibility................................................................
18
2. Community Involvement
`-
III.C. Additional Threshold Criteria for Site -Specific Proposals Only 18
N
.............................
SECTION IV. - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INFORMATION..................................................26
a
IV.A. How to Obtain a Proposal Package
0
................................................................................26
IV.B. Due Date and Submission Instructions
N.C. Content and Form of Proposal
'
1. Standard Form (SF) - 424, Application for Federal Assistance .................................. 28
2. Cover Letter..................................................................28
..............................................
3. The Narrative Proposal/Ranking Criteria
J
0
................................................................... 30
1. COMMUNITY NEED
w
30
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND FEASIBILITY OF SUCCESS
_I
0
......................... 32
3. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIPS ............... 35
a.
w
4. PROJECT BENEFITS........................................................................................... 37
5. PROGRAMMATIC CAPABILITY AND PAST PERFORMANCE
0
0
.................... 38
IV.D. Intergovernmental Review.............................................................................................40
Z
IV.E. Voluntary Cost Share/Leveraging
IV.F. Additional Provisions for Applicants Incorporated Into the Solicitation .......................41
SECTION V. - PROPOSAL REVIEW INFORMATION............................................................41
0
V.A. Evaluation Criteria
1. COMMUNITY NEED (45 Points)
............................................................................... 42
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND FEASIBILITY OF SUCCESS (55 Points) 43
.............
3. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIPS (35 Points) ...................... 45
4. PROJECT BENEFITS (25 Points)
............................................................................... 47
.-.
2
Packet Pg. 2249
5. PROGRAMMATIC CAPABILITY AND PAST PERFORMANCE (40 Points) ....... 47
V.B. Considerations and Other Factors...................................................................................50
V.C. Review and Selection Process.........................................................................................50
V.D. Additional Provisions For Applicants Incorporated Into the Solicitation .......................51
SECTION VI. - AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION.............................................51
VI.A. Award Notices...............................................................................................................51
VI.B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements........................................................52
VI.C. Reporting Requirements................................................................................................52
VI.D. Brownfields Programmatic Requirements.....................................................................52
VI.E. Use of Funds...................................................................................................................55
VI.F. Disputes..........................................................................................................................55
VI.G. Additional Provisions for Applicants Incorporated Into the Solicitation ......................55
SECTION VII. — AGENCY CONTACTS — Regional Brownfields Contacts..............................56
Appendix 1. Information on Sites Eligible for Brownfields Funding Under CERCLA § 104(k) ..57
Appendix 2. www.grants.gov Proposal Submission Instructions..................................................68
Appendix 3. Regional Priorities Form/Other Factors Checklist....................................................73
3
16.G:3.e
Packet Pg. 2250
SECTION I. - FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or the
Superfund Law) was amended by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields
Revitalization Act (Brownfields Law) to include section 104(k), which provides federal financial
assistance for brownfields revitalization, including grants for assessment, cleanup, and revolving
loan funds.
A brownfield site is defined as real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which
may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of hazardous substances, pollutants,
contaminants, controlled substances, petroleum or petroleum products, or is mine -scarred land.
A critical part of EPA's assessment and cleanup efforts is to ensure that residents living in
communities historically affected by economic disinvestment, health disparities, and
environmental contamination have an opportunity to reap the benefits from brownfields
redevelopment. EPA's Brownfields Program has a rich history rooted in environmental justice
and is committed to helping communities revitalize Brownfield properties, mitigate potential
health risks, and restore economic vitality.
As described in Section V. of this announcement, proposals will be evaluated based, among
other factors, on the extent to which the applicant demonstrates: economic and environmental
needs of the target communities; a vision for the reuse and redevelopment of brownfield sites
and the capability to achieve that vision; reasonable and eligible tasks and use of grant funding;
incorporation of equitable and sustainable approaches; community engagement, partnerships and
leveraged resources to complete the project; and economic, environmental, health, and social
benefits associated with the reuse and redevelopment of brownfield sites.
I.A. Description of Grant
Assessment Grants provide funding for developing inventories of brownfields, prioritizing sites,
conducting community involvement activities, conducting site assessments and cleanup planning
related to brownfield sites. Assessment Grant funds may not be used to conduct cleanups.
Assessment grants for individual applicants can be either community -wide or site-specific.
Community -wide proposals are appropriate when a specific site is not identified and the
applicant plans to spend grant funds on more than one brownfield in its community. Site-specific
proposals are appropriate when a specific site has been identified and the applicant plans to
spend grant funds on this one site only. The performance period for Assessment Grants is three
years. Refer to Section VI. for a list of certain grant and programmatic requirements.
Applicants that exceed the maximum number of proposals allowable for Assessment Grants will
be contacted, prior to review of any of the proposals by EPA, to determine which proposals the
applicant will withdraw from the competition.
16G,3.e
N
a
0
co
J
m
O
2
LU
J
O
Q
a
W
0
LL
0
Z
C
W
E
U
cc
i
Packet Pg. 2251
^ Assessment Grant Option Summary
1. Community -Wide
2. Site -Specific
3. Coalition
NEW: Up to $200,000 for
Up to $200,000 for
Up to $600,000 for
hazardous substances OR
hazardous substances, or
hazardous substances, or
$200,000 for petroleum
petroleum, or combination
petroleum, or combination
of both types of funding
of both types of funding
Up to $300,000 for
hazardous substances AND
petroleum; where the
amount of hazardous
substances or petroleum
does not exceed $200,000
for any individual type of
grant funding
No waiver of funding limit
May request a waiver for
No waiver of funding limit
up to $350,000
Maximum amount for
Maximum amount:
Maximum amount:
hazardous substances OR
$350,000
$600,000
petroleum: $200,000
Maximum amount for
hazardous substances AND
petroleum: $300,000; not
exceed $200,000 for any
individual type of grant
funding
May also apply for a Site-
May also apply for a
May not apply for an
specific Grant; may not
Community -wide Grant;
individual Community -
apply as a member of a
may not apply as a member
wide or Site-specific Grant
coalition
of a coalition
or as part of another
coalition
1. Community -Wide Assessment Grants
For Community -wide proposals, applicants may request hazardous substances funding' for
sites with potential contamination of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants and
petroleum funding for sites with potential petroleum contamination. Applicants may apply
for up to $200,000 in hazardous substances funding or up to $200,000 in petroleum funding.
' Sites eligible for hazardous substances funding are those sites with the presence or potential presence of hazardous
substances, pollutants, contaminants, sites that are contaminated with controlled substances or that are mine -scarred
lands. For more information on sites eligible for hazardous substances funding, please refer to the Brownfields
FAQs at www epa eov/sites/production/files/2016-08/documents/fv17 fags.pdf.
i-� 2 Sites eligible for petroleum funding are those sites that meet the definition set forth in CERCLA §
10 1 (3 9)(D)(ii)(11), as further described in Appendix 1, Section 1.3.2.
5
16:G.3.e
Packet Pg.2252
Applicants applying for both hazardous substances funding and petroleum funding may
request a combined total up to $300,000; however, the request for hazardous substances
funding or petroleum funding cannot exceed $200,000 for any one individual type of grant
funding. For example, an applicant may apply for $200,000 in hazardous substances funding
and $100,000 in petroleum funding. Applicants may either combine requests for hazardous
substances funding and petroleum funding into one proposal for up to $300,000 or applicants
may submit separate proposals for a combined total up to $300,000. An applicant that
submits a combined Community -wide Assessment Grant proposal or two separate
Community -wide Assessment Grant proposals may also apply for a Site-specific Assessment
Grant.
2. Site -Specific Assessment Grants
For Site-specific proposals, applicants may request up to $200,000 to address hazardous
substances or petroleum contamination at a specified site. Applicants can apply for only
one Site-specific Assessment Grant. Site-specific Assessment proposals must respond to the
site eligibility threshold criteria in Section IILC. appropriate to the contamination at the site.
If the site is co -mingled with both hazardous substances and petroleum contamination and
the hazardous substances and petroleum -contaminated areas of the site are distinguishable,
the proposal must address both eligibility criteria and indicate the dollar amount of funding
requested for each type of contamination. If the petroleum and hazardous substances are not
easily distinguishable, the applicant must indicate which contaminant is predominant based
on available information and respond to the appropriate site eligibility criteria. (Contact your
Regional Brownfields Contact listed in Section VII. for more information.) Note that an
applicant cannot propose an alternate site if the site identified in the proposal is determined
by EPA to be ineligible for brownfields funding.
Applicants may request a waiver of the $200,000 limit and request up to $350,000 for a
single site based on the anticipated level of contamination, size, or status of ownership of the
site. Applicants requesting a waiver must attach a one-page justification for the waiver
request. Further pages will not be considered. The justification should include a description
of the extent of contamination at the site, the size of the site, and the reasons for requesting
additional funding. For more information on the site-specific waiver justification, please refer
to the Brownfields Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) at
www.epa.Qov/sites/production/files/2016-08/documents/ ,17 fags pdf
3. Assessment Coalition Grants
Assessment Coalition proposals may be submitted by one "lead" eligible entity on behalf of a
coalition of eligible entities to create a "pool" of grant funds (see Section III.A. for a list of
entities eligible to apply for an Assessment Grant). A coalition is a group of three or more
eligible entities that submits one grant proposal, requesting funding up to $600,000, under the
name of one of the coalition participants who will be the grant recipient, if selected. Coalition
members may not have the same jurisdiction (for example, different departments in the same
county) unless they are separate legal entities (for example, a city and a redevelopment
on
16.G.3.e
T �\
C
N
N
a
0
00
T
T
J
m
O
w
J
O
a
CL
LU
O
LL
0
Z
c
W
Z
U
f6
Packet Pg. 2253
^^ agency). The grant recipient must administer the grant, be accountable to EPA for proper
expenditure of the funds, and be the point of contact for the other coalition members. All
Assessment Coalition Grant proposals must be community -wide proposals; therefore, the
applicant does not need to respond to the site eligibility threshold criteria in Section III.C.
Site eligibility will be determined after grant award and prior to expending grant funds at any
site. Coalitions will be required to assess a minimum of five sites.
Please note that once the "lead" eligible entity submits the proposal it becomes the applicant
and the coalition members may not substitute another eligible entity as the lead eligible entity
after the deadline for submitting proposals has passed.
A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) documenting the coalition's site selection process
must be in place prior to the expenditure of any funds that have been awarded to the
coalition. The coalition members should identify and establish relationships necessary to
achieve the project's goal. A process for successful execution of the project's goal, to include
a description and role of each coalition member, should be established along with the MOA.
The purpose of the MOA is for coalition members to agree internally on the distribution of
funds and the mechanisms for implementing the assessment work. MOAs do not need to be
included as part of your proposal.
Coalition members may not be members of other coalitions or apply for their own
assessment funding. A coalition member wishing to apply as part of a different coalition or
as a separate applicant must withdraw from the coalition to be eligible for individual
assessment funds.
For more information on a range of brownfields topics, please refer to the Brownfields FAQs
at www epa i4ov/sites/�roduction/files/2016-08/documents/fv17 fags.pdf. If you do not have
access to the Internet, you can contact your Regional Brownfields Contact listed in Section
VII.
I.B. Uses of Grant Funds
In addition to direct costs associated with the inventory, assessment, and cleanup planning for
brownfield sites, grant funds also may be used for the following activities:
1. Grant funds may be used for direct costs associated with programmatic management of the
grant, such as required performance reporting and environmental oversight.
All costs charged to Assessment Grants must be consistent with the applicable OMB Cost
Circular 2 CFR 200 Subpart E.
2. A local government (as defined in 2 CFR 200.64, Local Government, and summarized in
Section IIIA. of these guidelines) may use up to 10 percent of its grant funds for any of the
following activities:
a. health monitoring of populations exposed to hazardous substances, pollutants, or
contaminants from a brownfield site; and
7
16.G.3.e
Packet Pg: 2254
16.G.3.e
b. monitoring and enforcement of any institutional control used to prevent human exposure
to any hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant from a brownfield site.
3. A portion of the brownfields grant may be used to purchase environmental insurance.
See the Brownfields FAQs at www.epa.izov/sites/production/files/2016-
08/documents/fv17 fa
gs.pdf for additional information on purchasing environmental
insurance.
Grant funds cannot be used for the payment of:
1. proposal preparation costs;
2. a penalty or fine;
3. a federal cost -share requirement (for example, a cost share required by other federal funds);
4. administrative costs, such as indirect costs of grant administration with the exception of
financial and performance reporting costs;
5. a response cost at a brownfield site for which the recipient of the grant or loan is potentially LO
liable under CERCLA § 107; N
6. a cost of compliance with any federal law, excluding the cost of compliance with laws
o
applicable to the cleanup; or
N
7. unallowable costs (e.g., lobbying and fundraising) under OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, or A-
o
122, as applicable.
co
See the Brownfields FAQs at www.0a.�,,ov/sites/production/files/2016-
08/documents/fv17 faa s.pdf for additional information on ineligible grant activities and
m
00
ineligible costs.
I.C. EPA Strategic Plan Linkage
UJ
0
Q
Q
EPA's 2014-2018 Strategic Plan defines goals, objectives and sub -objectives for protecting
o
human health and the environment. Brownfields Assessment Grants will support progress toward
0
Goal 3 (Cleaning Up Communities and Advancing Sustainable Development), Objective 3.1
z
(Promote Sustainable and Livable Communities). Specifically, these grants will help sustain,
clean up and restore communities and the ecological systems that support them by providing
E
funds to assess and clean up brownfield sites. EPA will negotiate work plans with recipients to
m
collect information about the hazardous substances, pollutants and petroleum contaminants Q
addressed and the amount of land made safe for communities' economic and ecological use.
View EPA's Strategic Plan at http://wvwv.epa.gov/planandbud�et/strate�ieplan.
Packet Pg. 2255
I.D. Measuring Environmental Results: Anticipated Outputs/Outcomes
Pursuant to EPA Order 5700.7, "Environmental Results under EPA Assistance Agreements,"
EPA requires that all grant applicants and recipients adequately address environmental outputs
and outcomes. View EPA's Order 5700.7A1 at
https•//www 0a gov/sites/,oroduction/files/documents/common-elem-re£pdf.
EPA must report on the success of its Brownfields Program through measurable outputs and
outcomes, such as the number of sites assessed, number of jobs created and amount of funding
leveraged. Applicants are required to describe how funding will help EPA achieve environmental
outputs and outcomes in their responses to the ranking criteria (Sections IV.C.3.2., Project
Description and Feasibility of Success and IV.C.3.4., Project Benefits). Outputs and outcomes
specific to each project will be identified as deliverables in the negotiated work plan if the
proposal is selected for award. Grantees will be expected to report progress toward the
attainment of expected project outputs and outcomes during the project performance period.
Outputs and Outcomes are defined as follows.
1. Ou uts: The term "outputs" refers to an environmental activity, effort and/or associated
work products related to an environmental goal or objective that will be produced or
provided over a period of time or by a specified date. Outputs may be quantitative or
qualitative but must be measurable during the proj ect period. The expected outputs for the
grants awarded under these guidelines may include but are not limited to the number of
brownfield sites identified, development of an area -wide plan, number of Phase I and Phase
II site assessments, and number of community meetings held.
2. Outcomes: The term "outcomes" refers to the result, effect, or consequence that will occur
from carrying out the activities under the grant. Outcomes may be environmental, behavioral,
health-related, or programmatic; must be qualitative or quantitative; and may not necessarily
be achievable during the project period. Expected outcomes of Brownfields Grants include
the number of jobs created and funding leveraged through the economic reuse of sites; the
number of acres made ready for reuse or acres of greenspace created for communities; and
whether the project will minimize exposure to hazardous substances and other contamination.
I.E. Linking to HUD -DOT -EPA Partnership for Sustainable Communities, Sustainable and
Equitable Development Outcomes, and Supporting Environmental Justice
Under the Project Benefits ranking criterion in Section IV.C.3.4., applicants will be evaluated on
how their proposed Brownfield Assessment project will advance and incorporate sustainable
practices such as the HUD -DOT -EPA Livability Principles discussed below. In addition, the
proposal will be evaluated on the extent to which it will lead to sustainable and equitable
development outcomes and will address environmental justice challenges as discussed below.
EPA encourages applicants to provide specific examples of how the proposed Brownfield
Assessment projects will work to remove economic, environmental and social barriers to make
sustainable and equitable brownfields reuse of the highest priority.
9
16.G'.3.e
Packet Pg 2256
16G.3.e
Linking to the HUD -DOT -EPA Partnership for Sustainable Communities -�
EPA's Brownfields Assessment Program is being carried out consistent with the principles of the
Partnership for Sustainable Communities (PSC) among the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), and U.S. EPA. The
Partnership was conceived to advance coordinated infrastructure investment to improve
economic prosperity and build healthy, environmentally sustainable, and opportunity -rich
communities for all Americans, regardless of race or income. Recognizing the fundamental role c
that public investment plays in achieving these outcomes, the Administration charged three M
75
agencies whose programs impact the physical form of communities - HUD, DOT, and EPA - to
coordinate and incorporate the Livability Principles into their policies and funding programs to M
the maximum degree possible. The Livability Principles can be found at 06
www.sustainablecommunities.gov and include: (1) Providing more transportation choices; (2) 0
Promoting equitable, affordable housing; (3) Increasing economic competitiveness; (4) C
Supporting existing communities; (5) Leveraging federal investment; and (6) Valuing
communities and neighborhoods.
Linking Brownfield Assessment Approaches to Sustainable and Equitable Development
Outcomes
Applicants should incorporate sustainable and equitable reuse approaches into their proposed
0
Brownfield
Brownfield Assessment projects. The Agency may also consider how well an applicant's
-
m
proposed project is coordinated with HUD, DOT, EPA programs and programs available from
other potential federal and non-federal partners. Sustainable and equitable approaches can ensure
N
brownfields are reused in ways that:
• contribute to greener and healthier homes, buildings, and neighborhoods;
0'1
• mitigate environmental conditions through effective deconstruction and remediation
N
strategies which address solid and hazardous waste, and improve air and water quality;
m
• improve access by residents to greenspace, recreational property, transit, schools, otherco
o
nonprofit uses (e.g., libraries, health clinics, youth centers, etc.), and healthy and
affordable food;
• improve employment and affordable housing opportunities for local residents;
• reduce toxicity, illegal dumping, and blighted vacant parcels; and
m
0
• retain residents who have historically lived within the area affected by brownfields.
w
J
0
Sustainable development practices facilitate environmentally -sensitive brownfields cleanup and
Q
redevelopment while also helping to make communities more attractive, economically stronger,
w
and more socially diverse. While ensuring consistency with community -identified priorities,
0
sustainable development approaches encourage Brownfield site reuse in ways that provide new
0
jobs, commercial opportunities, open -space amenities, and/or social services to an existing
Z
_
neighborhood. Brownfields site preparation strategies that prevent contaminant exposure through
green building design, materials recycling, enable urban agricultural reuse, promote walkability
to/around the site and contribute to community walkability, and on-site stormwater management
w
through green infrastructure, among other approaches, can contribute to sustainable development
Q
outcomes.
Equitable development outcomes come about when intentional strategies are put in place to
ensure that low-income and minority communities not only participate in but also benefit from, -^
10
Packet Pg. 2257-
decisions that shape their neighborhoods and regions. There are many different approaches that
promote equitable development, such as ensuring a mix of housing types across a range of
incomes; access to fresh food; access to jobs; and access to local capital. Programs or policies
can be put in place to help ensure creation or integration of affordable housing; local or first -
source hiring; minority contracting; inclusionary zoning (where a percentage of new housing is
designated as affordable housing); healthy food retailers in places where they do not exist (e.g.
food deserts); co-operative ownership models where local residents come together to run a
community -owned, jointly owned business enterprise; rent control or community land trusts (to
help keep property affordable for residents); supportive local entrepreneurial activities; and
adherence to equal lending opportunities.
Linking Brownfield Assessment Approaches to Environmental Justice
Environmental justice can be supported through sustainable and equitable development
approaches. EPA defines environmental justice as the fair treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the
development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.
EPA has this goal for all communities and persons across the nation. Environmental justice will
be achieved when everyone enjoys the same degree of protection from environmental and health
hazards and equal access to the decision-making process to have a healthy environment in which
to live, learn, and work.3
I.F. Regional Priorities
In the narrative proposal, applicants must include information on how their proposed
Brownfields Assessment project will advance the regional priorities identified in the list below
that apply to the region where the project will be performed. This information may be considered
by the Selection Official as an "other factor," as described in Sections V.B. and V.C. of the
guidelines, during the selection process. If more than one priority is listed for a region then the
applicant may include information on one or both of the priorities; although addressing both does
not necessarily mean it will benefit them more than if they only address one. The information
provided should clearly indicate how the project addresses the applicable priority for the region
in which the project is located. For example, if applying to perform a project in US EPA Region
1, then describe how the project will address a regional priority listed for Region 1. Please see
Section VII. to identify the region where your project is located.
Proposed projects must be for activities which inventory, characterize, assess and conduct
planning relating to one or more brownfields sites.
Region
I Regional Priority (ies)
■ Assistance to Communities That Have Limited In -House Capacity to
Manage Brownfields Projects — This regional priority includes proposed
1
projects that provide support to communities that have limited capacity or
administrative infrastructure to effectively manage brownfields programs.
Proposals that include partnerships among governmental entities having shared
3 For more information please visit ww epa.aov/environmental'ust tice.
11
16.G.3.e
Packet Pg. 2258
12
16G.3.e
c
0
0
0
aD
e:
0
0
0
U
0
c
3
0
m`
Ln
LO
It
N
to
T7, --
CN ,--
N
0
0
CO
J
m
0
Ll
J
0
CL
LU
0
L_
0
Z
c
W
E
U
e
Packet Pg. 2259'
jurisdiction over the target sites (e.g. state, regional authorities, local
governments) relate to this priority.
OR
■ Coordinated Public Funding for Brownfields — This regional priority
includes proposed projects that complement other brownfield efforts receiving
federal, state or local funding or where the community is working with federal,
state, or local governments to address their brownfields. EPA Region 1 is
particularly interested in projects where the applicant has already been working
with federal, state, or local agencies, or where funding has been received and
the EPA grant would "fill the gaps" to establish a comprehensive approach to
Brownfields site characterization, assessment, cleanup and redevelopment.
■ Assistance to Communities That Have Limited In -House Capacity to
Manage Brownfields Projects — This regional priority includes proposed
projects that provide support to communities that have limited capacity or
administrative infrastructure to effectively manage brownfields programs.
Proposals that include partnerships among governmental entities having shared
jurisdiction over the target sites (e.g. state, regional authorities, local
2
governments) relate to this priority.
OR
■ Climate Change Resiliency — This regional priority includes proposed projects
which will advance or contribute to community climate change resiliency
through the "green" use or reuse of existing infrastructure, protection of
greenfields, or similar activities to address flooding due to sea level rise,
stormwater runoff, or an extreme weather event.
■ Climate Change Resiliency — This regional priority includes proposed projects
which will advance or contribute to community climate change resiliency
through the "green" use or reuse of existing infrastructure, protection of
greenfields, or similar activities to address flooding due to sea level rise,
stormwater runoff, or an extreme weather event.
OR
3
■ Coordinated Public Funding for Brownfields — This regional priority
includes proposed projects that complement other brownfield efforts receiving
federal, state or local funding or where the community is working with federal,
state, or local governments to address their brownfields. EPA Region 3 is
particularly interested in projects where the applicant has already been working
with federal, state, or local agencies, or where funding has been received and
the EPA grant would "fill the gaps" to establish a comprehensive approach to
Brownfields site characterization, assessment, cleanup and redevelopment.
■ Assistance to Communities That Have Limited In -House Capacity to
4
Manage Brownfields Projects — This regional priority includes proposed
projects that provide support to communities that have limited capacity or
12
16G.3.e
c
0
0
0
aD
e:
0
0
0
U
0
c
3
0
m`
Ln
LO
It
N
to
T7, --
CN ,--
N
0
0
CO
J
m
0
Ll
J
0
CL
LU
0
L_
0
Z
c
W
E
U
e
Packet Pg. 2259'
13
16.G.3.e
LO
LO
N
CO
0
N
N
a�
0
0
CO
J
m
0
2
LU
O
Q
CL
LU
O
LL
0
Z
c
d
U
cc
Q
Packet Pg. 2260 -
administrative infrastructure to effectively manage brownfields programs.
Proposals that include partnerships among governmental entities having shared
jurisdiction over the target sites (e.g. state, regional authorities, local
governments) relate to this priority.
■ Coordinated Public Funding for Brownfields — This regional priority
includes proposed projects that complement other efforts receiving federal, state
or local funding or assistance. EPA Region 5 is particularly interested in
projects that supplement publicly funded site characterization and remediation
projects in Great Lakes Areas of Concern, projects that serve areas where there
5
are already coordinated federal agency partnerships investing in brownfields, or
similar sources of public funding that can be leveraged for brownfields
purposes, or where funding has been received and the EPA grant would "fill the
gaps" to establish a comprehensive approach to Brownfields site
characterization, assessment, cleanup and redevelopment.
■ Assistance to Communities That Have Limited In -House Capacity to
Manage Brownfields Projects — This regional priority includes proposed
projects that provide support to communities that have limited capacity or
administrative infrastructure to effectively manage brownfields programs.
Proposals that include partnerships among governmental entities having shared
jurisdiction over the target sites (e.g. state, regional authorities, local
governments) relate to this priority.
6
OR
■ Improving Air Quality — This regional priority includes proposed projects
which will reduce threats to human health (e.g. asthma and cancer) and the
environment including assessment activities that support efforts to improve air
quality in non -attainment areas affected by pollutants and contaminants such as
ozone, particulate matter, sulfur -dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, lead, and carbon
monoxide.
■ Assistance to Communities That Have Limited In -House Capacity to
Manage Brownfields Projects — This regional priority includes proposed
projects that provide support to communities that have limited capacity or
administrative infrastructure to effectively manage brownfields programs.
Proposals that include partnerships among governmental entities having shared
jurisdiction over the target sites (e.g. state, regional authorities, local
governments) relate to this priority.
7
OR
■ Coordinated Public Funding for Brownfields — This regional priority
includes proposed projects that complement other brownfield efforts receiving
federal, state or local funding or where the community is working with federal,
state, or local governments to address their brownfields. EPA Region 7 is
particularly interested in projects where the applicant has already been working
with federal, state, or local agencies, or where funding has been received and
13
16.G.3.e
LO
LO
N
CO
0
N
N
a�
0
0
CO
J
m
0
2
LU
O
Q
CL
LU
O
LL
0
Z
c
d
U
cc
Q
Packet Pg. 2260 -
14
16.G,3.e
LO
LO
N
to
C
N
N
0
CO
T
m
0
UJ
O
Q
CL
LU
0
1
0
Z
w
_
m
U
f4
El
Packet Pg. 2261
the EPA grant would "fill the gaps" to establish a comprehensive approach to
Brownfields site characterization, assessment, cleanup and redevelopment.
■ Protect/Enhance Water — This regional priority includes proposed
projects
which will reduce threats to human health and the environment from the release
of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants, by supporting efforts to
protect or enhance water supplies, including surface water, ground water and/or
storm water infrastructure. EPA Region 8 is particularly interested in projects
that improve or protect the quality of water associated with brownfield sites or
whereby addressing the brownfield site it will reduce threats to nearby
8
residents.
OR
■ Assistance to Small and Underserved Communities — This regional priority
includes proposed projects that target the majority of the work at brownfield
sites in small, rural and/or low-income communities unable to draw on other
public or private sources of funds for environmental remediation. EPA Region 8
is particularly interested in projects that serve the needs of communities with
populations of less than 50,000.
■ Leveraging New/Expanded Transit Investments to Reduce Air Pollution —
This regional priority includes proposed projects that will reduce threats to
human health (e.g. asthma and cancer) and the environment and support efforts
to improve air quality through transit investments (e.g., site assessments that
assist efforts to clear the right of way for transit infrastructure and transit -
oriented redevelopment of Brownfield sites). Note: Examples of transit
investments include, light rail, high-speed rail, bus rapid transit, new bus
service, and bicycle infrastructure. EPA Region 9 is particularly interested in
projects that reduce air pollution through the use of new or expanded
9
transportation investments to use or reuse existing infrastructure or otherwise
reduce vehicle miles traveled, and create walkable communities.
OR
■ Climate Change - Drought -Stricken Communities — This regional priority
includes proposed projects which address climate change impacts caused by
drought. EPA Region 9 is particularly interested in projects where the
brownfield assessment, cleanup and reuse activities will reduce, prevent, or
address climate change issues related to drought in order to reduce the threats to
the health and welfare of vulnerable populations and lessen environmental
impacts to communities.
■ Protect/Enhance Water — This regional priority includes proposed projects
10
which will reduce threats to human health and the environment from the release
of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants, by supporting efforts to
protect or enhance water supplies, including surface water, ground water and/or
14
16.G,3.e
LO
LO
N
to
C
N
N
0
CO
T
m
0
UJ
O
Q
CL
LU
0
1
0
Z
w
_
m
U
f4
El
Packet Pg. 2261
storm water infrastructure. EPA Region 10 is particularly interested in projects
that improve or protect the quality of water associated with brownfield sites or
whereby addressing the brownfield site it will reduce threats to nearby
residents.
OR
Threatened and Endangered Species — This regional priority includes
proposed projects which facilitate the creation, addition or preservation of the
habitats (e.g. state, tribal or local parks, greenways, recreational or undeveloped
property dedicated to nonprofit use) of federal and state listed threatened and
endangered species.
SECTION IL - AWARD INFORMATION
II.A. What is the Amount of Available Funding?
The total estimated funding available under the national competition for Assessment and
Cleanup Grants is estimated at $54 million subject to the availability of funds, quality of
proposals, and other applicable considerations. A separate announcement is posted for the
Cleanup Grant competition. EPA may expend up to 25 percent of the amount appropriated for
Brownfields Grants on sites contaminated with petroleum. EPA anticipates awarding an
estimated 294 grants among assessment and cleanup grant types. Under this announcement, EPA
anticipates awarding an estimated 234 Assessment Grants for a total amount of approximately
$42 million in funding.
In addition, EPA reserves the right to award additional grants under this competition should
additional funding become available. Any additional selections for awards will be made no later
than six months from the date of the original selection decision. EPA reserves the right to reject
all proposals and make no awards under this announcement or make fewer awards than
anticipated.
In appropriate circumstances, EPA reserves the right to partially fund proposals by funding
discrete portions or phases of proposed projects. To maintain the integrity of the competition and
selection process, EPA, if it decides to partially fund a proposal, will do so in a manner that does
not prejudice any applicants or affect the basis upon which the proposal, or portion thereof, was
evaluated and selected for award.
II.B. What is the Project Period for Awards Resulting from this Solicitation?
The project period for Assessment Grants is up to three years.
ILC. Substantial Involvement
The Brownfield Assessment Grant will be awarded in the form of a cooperative agreement.
Cooperative agreements permit the EPA Project Officer to be substantially involved in
overseeing the work performed by the selected recipients. Although EPA will negotiate precise
15
16.G.3.e
Packet Pg. 2262'
16.G.3.e
terms and conditions relating to substantial involvement as part of the award process, the
anticipated substantial federal involvement for this project may include:
• close monitoring of the recipient's performance to verify the results;
• collaborating during the performance of the scope of work;
• reviewing substantive terms of proposed contracts;
• reviewing qualifications of key personnel (EPA will not select employees or contractors
employed by the award recipient);
• reviewing and commenting on reports prepared under the cooperative agreement (the
final decision on the content of reports rests with the recipient); and
• reviewing sites to verify they meet applicable site eligibility criteria.
SECTION III. — ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION and THRESHOLD CRITERIA
IIIA. Who Can Apply?
The following information indicates which entities are eligible to apply for an Assessment Grant.
Nonprofit organizations are not eligible to apply for an Assessment Grant unless the entity is
included as a "General Purpose Unit of Local Government" as defined below.
• General Purpose Unit of Local Government. (For purposes of the EPA Brownfields Grant
Program, a "local government" is defined as stated under 2 CFR 200.64.: Local government
means a county, municipality, city, town, township, local public authority (including any
public and Indian housing agency under the United States Housing Act of 1937), school
district, special district, intrastate district, council of governments (whether or not
incorporated as a nonprofit corporation under state law), any other regional or interstate
government entity, or any agency or instrumentality of a local government.)
• Land Clearance Authority or other quasi -governmental entity that operates under the
supervision and control of, or as an agent of, a general purpose unit of local government.
• Government Entity Created by State Legislature.
• Regional Council or group of General Purpose Units of Local Government.
• Redevelopment Agency that is chartered or otherwise sanctioned by a state.
• State.
• Indian tribe other than in Alaska. (The exclusion of Alaskan tribes from Brownfields Grant
eligibility is statutory at CERCLA § I04(k)(1). Intertribal Consortia, comprised of eligible
Indian tribes, are eligible for funding in accordance with EPA's policy for funding intertribal
consortia published in the Federal Register on November 4, 2002, at 67 Fed. Reg. 67181.
This policy also may be obtained from your Regional Brownfields Contact listed in Section
VII.)
• Alaska Native Regional Corporation, Alaska Native Village Corporation, and Metlakatla
Indian Community. (Alaska Native Regional Corporations and Alaska Native Village
Corporations are defined in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 and
following)). For more information, please refer to Brownfields FAQs at
www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-08/documents/fy17 fags pdf)
L
C
N
d
co
J
n]
O
LU
J
O
a -
LU
O
LL
O
Z
Q
Packet Pg. 2263
III.B. Threshold Criteria for Assessment Grants
This section contains the threshold eligibility criteria that ensure applicants are eligible to receive
Assessment Grants. Threshold criteria are pass/fail and include certain requests for information
identified below. The information you submit will be used by EPA solely to make site eligibility
determinations for Brownfields grants and is not legally binding for other purposes including
federal, state, or tribal enforcement actions. Only those proposals that pass all the threshold
criteria will be evaluated against the ranking criteria in Section IV.C.3. of this announcement.
Applicants deemed ineligible for funding consideration as a result of the threshold
eligibility review will be notified within 15 calendar days of the ineligibility determination.
If a proposal is submitted that includes any ineligible tasks or activities, that portion of the
proposal will be ineligible for funding and may, depending on the extent to which it affects the
proposal, render the entire proposal ineligible for funding.
Your responses to these items are required and must be included as an attachment to the
Narrative Proposal you submit to EPA. Section IV.C. for a complete list of required documents
that must be submitted.
In order to maintain the integrity of the competition process, EPA staff cannot meet with
individual applicants to discuss draft proposals, provide informal comments on draft proposals,
or provide advice to applicants on how to respond to ranking criteria. EPA's limitations on staff
involvement with grant applicants are described in EPA's Assistance Agreement Competition
Policy (EPA Order 5700.5A1). However, EPA staff will respond to questions regarding
threshold eligibility criteria, administrative issues related to the submission of the proposal, and
requests for clarification about this announcement.
For purposes of the threshold eligibility review, EPA, if necessary, may seek clarification of
applicant information and/or consider information from other sources, including EPA files.
Proposals must substantially comply with the proposal submission instructions and requirements
set forth in Section IV. of this announcement or they will be reje� cted. Pages in excess of the page
limits described in Section IV. for the Cover Letter and Narrative Proposal, and attachments not
specifically required, will not be reviewed.
In addition, initial proposals must be submitted through A ww.g7rants.gov as stated in Section IV.
of this announcement (except in the limited circumstances where another mode of submission is
specifically allowed for as explained in Appendix 2) on or before the proposal submission
deadline. Applicants are responsible for following the submission instructions in Section IV. of
this announcement to ensure that their proposal is submitted in a timely manner.
Proposals received after the submission deadline will be considered late and deemed ineligible
without further consideration unless the applicant can clearly demonstrate that it was late due to
EPA mishandling or because of technical problems associated with www. grants. 6ov or relevant
www.sam.gov system issues. An applicant's failure to timely submit their proposal through
17
Packet Pg. 2264
16.G.3.e
www.grants.gov because they did not timely or properly register in www.sam.gov or
www.grants.gov will not be considered an acceptable reason to consider a late submission.
EPA will verify the Data Universal Number System (DUNS) number listed on the application is
the correct DUNS number for the applicant's organization. If the correct DUNS number is not
included on the application, the application may be deemed ineligible.
1. Applicant Eligibilitv
Describe how you are an eligible entity for an Assessment Grant as specified in Section
III.A., Who Can Apply? For entities other than cities counties tribes or states please attach
documentation of your eligibility (e.g.,resolutions statutes etc.).
Assessment Coalitions must document how all coalition members are eligible entities. All
coalition members must submit a letter to the grant applicant (lead coalition member) in
which they agree to be part of the coalition. Attach these letters to your proposal
2. Community Involvement
Describe how you intend to inform and involve the community and other stakeholders during
the planning, implementation and other brownfield assessment activities described in your
proposal.
III.C. Additional Threshold Criteria for Site -Specific Proposals Only N
The following items provide important information related to determining if a proposed
brownfield site is eligible for funding.
N
r
1. Basic Site Information
0
Identify: (a) the name of the site; (b) the address of the site, including zip code; and (c) the co
current owner of the site.
2. Status and History of Contamination at the Site M
M
Identify: (a) whether this site is contaminated by petroleum or hazardous substances; (b) the 0
operational history and current use(s) of the site; (c) environmental concerns, if known, at the �
w
site; and (d) how the site became contaminated, and to the extent possible, describe the 0
nature and extent of the contamination. Q
a
ua
3. Brownfields Site Definition U_
0
To be eligible for a grant, sites must meet the definition of a brownfield as described in Z
Appendix 1. The following types of properties are not eligible for brownfields funding: c
• facilities listed (or proposed for listing) on the National Priorities List (NPL); E
• facilities subject to unilateral administrative orders, court orders, administrative orders on R
consent, or judicial consent decrees issued to or entered into by parties under CERCLA;
and
• facilities that are subject to the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the U.S. government.
(Note: Land held in trust by the U.S. government for an Indian tribe is eligible for
brownfields funding.)
18
Packet, Pg. 2265'
^ Affirm that the site is: (a) not listed or proposed for listing on the National Priorities List; (b)
not subject to unilateral administrative orders, court orders, administrative orders on consent,
or judicial consent decrees issued to or entered into by parties under CERCLA; and (c) not
subject to the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the U.S. government. (Note: Land held in
trust by the U.S. government for an Indian tribe is eligible for brownfields funding.) Please
refer to CERCLA §§ 101(39)(B)(ii), (iii), and (vii) and Appendix 1.
4. Enforcement or Other Actions
Identify known ongoing or anticipated environmental enforcement or other actions related to
the brownfield site for which funding is sought. Describe any inquiries, or orders from
federal, state, or local government entities that the applicant is aware of regarding the
responsibility of any party (including the applicant) for the contamination, or hazardous
substances at the site, including any liens. The information provided in this section may be
verified, and EPA may conduct an independent review of information related to the
applicant's responsibility for the contamination or hazardous substances at the site.
Sites Requiring a Property -Specific Determination
Certain types of sites require a property -specific determination in order to be eligible for
funding. Please refer to Appendix 1, Section 1.5. and the information below to determine
whether your site requires a property -specific determination. If your site requires a property -
specific determination, then you must attach the information requested in the Brownfields
FAQs, www.gpa.gov/sites/-production/files/2016-08/documents/fvl7 fags.pdf. If not
required, affirm that the site does not need a Property -Specific Determination.
The following special classes of property require a "Property -Specific Determination" from
EPA to be eligible for brownfields funding:
• properties subject to planned or ongoing removal actions under CERCLA;
• properties with facilities that have been issued or entered into a unilateral administrative
order, a court order, an administrative order on consent, or judicial consent decree or to
which a permit has been issued by the United States or an authorized state under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act (FWPCA), the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), or the Safe Drinking Water
Act (SDWA);
• properties with facilities subject to RCRA corrective action (§3004(u) or §3008(h)) to
which a corrective action permit or order has been issued or modified to require the
implementation of corrective measures;
• properties that are land disposal units that have submitted a RCRA closure notification
or that are subject to closure requirements specified in a closure plan or permit;
• properties where there has been a release of PCBs and all or part of the property is
subject to TSCA remediation; and
• properties that include facilities receiving monies for cleanup from the Leaking
Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Trust Fund (see Appendix 1 for a definition of
LUST Trust Fund sites).
EPA's approval of Property -Specific Determinations will be based on whether or not
awarding a grant will protect human health and the environment and either promote
19
16.G.3.e
Packet Pg. 2266 1.
economic development or enable the property to be used for parks, greenways, and similar
recreational or nonprofit purposes. Property -Specific Determination requests must be
attached to your proposal and do not count toward the 15 -page limit for Narrative Proposals.
(See Appendix 1 for more information or contact your Regional Brownfields Contact listed
in Section VII. if you think your site requires a Property -Specific Determination.)
6. Site Eligibility and Propertv Ownership Eligibility
Applicants eligible for brownfields grant funds cannot be liable for contamination on the site.
Site eligibility related to liability is determined differently at sites contaminated with
hazardous substances than for sites contaminated by petroleum or petroleum product.
If the site is a hazardous substance site, please respond to all the items under (a).
If the site is a petroleum site, please respond to all the items under (b), including the
requirement to provide a petroleum determination letter.
If the site is co -mingled with hazardous substances and petroleum contaminants, determine
whether the predominant contaminant is hazardous substances or petroleum, and respond to
the corresponding items (as noted above).
If applying for hazardous substances and petroleum funding at the same site, and the
hazardous substances and petroleum contaminated areas of the site are distinguishable, the
proposal must respond to all the items under (a) and (b), including the requirement to
provide a petroleum determination letter.
(a) Property Ownership Eligibility — Hazardous Substance Sites
For sites contaminated by hazardous substances, persons, including government entities,
who may be found liable for the contamination under CERCLA (the Superfund Law)
§ 107 are not eligible for grants. Liable parties may include all current owners and
operators, former owners and operators of the site at the time of disposal of hazardous
substances, and parties that arranged for, or contributed to, the disposal or treatment of
hazardous substances on the site. Therefore, even owners who did not cause or contribute
to the contamination may be held liable.
To be eligible for a Site-specific Brownfields Grant to address contamination at a
brownfields property, eligible entities who fall within one of the categories of potentially
liable parties must demonstrate that they meet one of the liability protections or defenses
set forth in CERCLA by establishing that they are: (1) an innocent landowner; (2) a bona
fide prospective purchaser (BFPP); (3) a contiguous property owner; or (4) a local or
state government entity that acquired the property involuntarily through bankruptcy, tax
delinquency, or abandonment, or by exercising its power of eminent domain. To claim
protection from liability as an innocent landowner, bona fide prospective purchaser, or
contiguous property owner, property owners, including state and local governments, must
conduct all appropriate inquiries prior to acquiring the property. (Please note that these
requirements apply to all property acquisitions, including properties acquired by donation
or title transfer at zero cost.)
20
16G.3.e
C
a
0
T
J
m
0
2
LU
J
O
Q
ri
LU
O
1
0
Z
c
d
U
Q
Packet Pg. 2267
^" Because current owners of contaminated property are potentially liable under CERCLA,
all Site-specific Assessment Grant applicants must demonstrate in their proposals that
they are not a liable party by establishing that they meet the requirements of one of the
liability protections or defenses set forth in CERCLA. For more information on these
liability protections, please refer to the Brownfields Law, the April 2009 Fact Sheet
entitled: "EPA Brownfields Grants, CERCLA Liability and All Appropriate Inquiries," at
http•//www epa Dov/sites/production/files/2014-08/documents/aaifs.12df and the March 6,
2003 EPA guidance entitled Interim Guidance Regarding Criteria Landowners Must
Meet in Order to Qualify for Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser, Contiguous Property
Owner, or Innocent Landowner Limitations on CERCLA ("Common Elements") at
http://www epa.l�ov/sites/production/files/documents/common-elem-guide.pdf.
Applicants may also call the Regional Brownfields Contact listed in Section VII. with
questions about eligibility.
The most common liability protection asserted by applicants is the bona fide prospective
purchaser protection (BFPP). Although the statute limits eligibility for BFPP liability
protection to entities that purchase property after January 11, 2002, a brownfields grant
applicant can take advantage of this protection, for grant purposes only, even if it
acquired a site prior to January 11, 2002. Applicants must demonstrate that they complied
with all the other BFPP requirements listed below. For further information, please see
FAQs on All Appropriate Inquiries for more information at
www.gpa.tiov/sites/Troduction/files/2016-08/documents/fyl7 fags.pdf.
• All disposal of hazardous substances at the site occurred before the person acquired
the site.
• The owner must not be liable in any way for contamination at the site or affiliated
with a responsible party. Affiliations include familial, contractual, financial, or
corporate relationships that are the result of a reorganization of a business entity with
potential liability.
• The owner must have conducted all appropriate inquiries (AAI) prior to acquiring the
rp operty. AAI, typically met by conducting a Phase 1 environmental site assessment
using the ASTM E1527-13 standard practice, must be conducted or updated within
one year prior to the date the property is acquired (i.e., the date on which the entity
takes title to the property). In addition, certain aspects of the AAI or Phase I site
assessment must be updated, prior to property acquisition, if the activities were
conducted more than six months prior to the date of acquisition. Please see the fact
sheet "EPA Brownfields Grants, CERCLA Liability and All Appropriate Inquiries,"
or EPA's AAI Final Rule (70 FR 66070) at www.epa.gov/brownfields/brownfields-
all-qppropriate-inquiries.
• The owner must take appropriate care regarding any hazardous substances found at
the site, including preventing future releases and exposures to hazardous substances
on the site.
• The owner must provide all legally required notices and cooperate with authorized
response persons in the event of discovery or release of any hazardous substances at
the site.
21
16.G.3.e
Packet Pg. 2268
The owner must comply with any land -use restrictions associated with response
actions at the site.
EPA grant funding may not be used to pay for response costs at a brownfield site for
which the recipient of the grant is potentially liable under CERCLA § 107. The following
items are intended to help EPA ensure that you are not liable under CERCLA for
response costs at the site designated in your proposal, or determine, if necessary, that
your site is eligible for funding as a petroleum site. Please respond to the following items
fully and in the order that they appear. Note, based on your responses, EPA may need to
obtain additional information to make this determination.
(1) CERCLA � 107 Liability
Affirm that you are not potentially liable for contamination at the site under CERCLA
§ 107 (e.g., as a current owner or operator of a facility, an owner or operator of a
facility at the time of disposal of a hazardous substance, a party that arranged for the
treatment or disposal of hazardous substances, or a party that accepted hazardous
substances for transport to disposal or treatment facilities at the site) by establishing
that you are eligible for one of the CERCLA liability protections or defenses (see
Section III.C.6.) and explain why.
(2) Information on Liability and Defense Protections
Applicant Does NOT Own the Site
If you, the applicant, do not own the site to be assessed, please:
a. affirm that you did not arrange for the disposal of hazardous substances at the site
or transport hazardous substances to the site, and that you did not cause or
contribute to any releases of hazardous substances at the site;
b. describe your relationship with the owner and the owner's role in the work to be
performed; and
c. indicate how you will gain access to the site.
Applicant Owns the Site or Will Own the Site During the Performance of the Grant
If you, the applicant, own the site to be assessed or will own the site at some point
during the performance of the grant, please respond to the following:
a. Information on the Property Acquisition To save space, you may combine
responses to the following into one response, though please be sure to answer
each item fully. Describe:
i) how you acquired or will acquire ownership (e.g., by negotiated purchase
from a private individual, by purchase or transfer from another
governmental unit, by foreclosure of real property taxes, by eminent
domain, or other (describe);
ii) the date you acquired or will acquire the property;
iii) the name and identity of the party from whom you acquired or will acquire
ownership (i.e., the transferor); and
22
16G,3.e
W
T �\
Q
N
N
m
0
6
J
IM
O
w
O
CL
LU
O
U_
O
Z
c
m
U
t4
w-+
all
Packet Pg.2269
^ iv) all familial, contractual, corporate, or financial relationships or affiliations
you have or had with all prior owners or operators (or other potentially
responsible parties) of the property (including the person or entity from
which you acquired the property).
b. Timing and/or Contribution Toward Hazardous Substances Disposal Identify
whether all disposal of hazardous substances at the site occurred before you
acquired (or will acquire) the property and whether you caused or contributed to
any release of hazardous substances at the site. Affirm that you have not, at any
time, arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances at the site or transported
hazardous substances to the site.
Pre -Purchase Inquiry Describe any inquiry by you or others into the previous
ownership, uses of the property, and environmental conditions conducted prior to
taking ownership. Please include the items below in your description.
i) The types of site assessments performed (e.g., ASTM E1527-13 Phase I),
the dates of each assessment, and the entity for which they were performed
(state whether the assessment was performed specifically for you, or if not,
the name of the party that had the assessment performed and that party's
relationship to you). Please note that to be eligible for a Brownfields Grant,
parties who may be potentially liable under CERCLA (which includes
current owners of the property) must demonstrate they are not liable for
contamination at the property. In most cases, this demonstration must
include evidence that an AAI investigation, or Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment in compliance with ASTM E1527-13 (or ASTM E2247-08)
was conducted prior to property acquisition.
ii) Who performed the AAI investigation or Phase I environmental site
assessments and identify his/her qualifications to perform such work.
iii) If the original AAI investigation or Phase I environmental site assessment
was conducted more than 180 days prior to the date you acquired the
property, affirm that you conducted the appropriate updates of the original
assessment within 180 days prior to your acquisition of the property in
order to take advantage of the bona fide prospective purchaser, innocent
landowner, or contiguous property owner provision.
d. Post -Acquisition Uses Describe all uses to which the property has been put since
you acquired ownership (or the uses that you anticipate once you acquire the
property) through the present, including any uses by persons, or entities other than
you. Please provide a timeline with the names of all current and prior users during
the time of your ownership; the dates of all uses; the details of each use, including
the rights or other reason pursuant to which the use was claimed or taken (e.g.,
lease, license, trespass); and your relationship to the current and prior users.
23
16.G.3.e
Packet Pg. 2270
16G.3.e
e. Continuing Obligations 3 Describe in detail the specific appropriate care that you
exercised (or if you have yet to acquire the property, that you will exercise upon
acquiring the property) with respect to hazardous substances found at the site by
taking reasonable steps4 to:
i) stop any continuing releases;
ii) prevent any threatened future release; and
iii) prevent or limit exposure to any previously released hazardous substance. o
Please confirm your commitment to:
i) comply with all land -use restrictions and institutional controls;
ii) assist and cooperate with those performing the assessment and provide
access to the property;
iii) comply with all information requests and administrative subpoenas that have
or may be issued in connection with the property; and
iv) provide all legally required notices.
(b) Property Ownership EliLxibility - Petroleum Sites
(Disregard this item if you do not have a petroleum site.)
The Brownfields Law outlines specific criteria by which petroleum sites may be eligible
m
for Brownfields Grant funding. In addition to the basic brownfields eligibility criteria,
LO
eligibility for petroleum sites is determined by applying the criteria established by
N
Congress: the site must be of "relatively low risk," there can be no viable responsible
party, the applicant cannot be potentially liable for cleaning up the site, and the site must
not be subject to a RCRA corrective action order. If a party is identified as being
N
responsible for the site and that party is financially viable, then the site is not eligible for
brownfields grant funds (refer to Appendix 1, Section 1.3.2. for more information).
o
Generally, petroleum site eligibility will be determined by EPA or the state, as
CO
appropriate. Where the state is unable to make the eligibility determination, EPA will
r
make the determination. EPA will make the determination for tribes.
J
m
Non -tribal applicants must provide the information required for a petroleum site
eligibility determination (listed below) to your state, so that the state can make the
necessary determination on petroleum site eligibility. You must provide EPA with a copy
O
d
LU
' Applicants that own contaminated land should be aware that some CERCLA liability protections require
O
u -
that the site owner meet certain continuing obligations. For example, grantees must comply with land -use
O
z
restrictions and institutional controls; take reasonable steps with respect to the hazardous substances on
the property; cooperate with, assist, and allow access to authorized representatives; and comply with
m
E
CERCLA information requests and subpoenas and provide legally required notices. For more information
on the obligations of owners of contaminated property, see EPA's "Common Elements Reference Sheet"
i0
at https://www.epa.Lyov/sites/production/files/documents/common-elem-ref pdf.
Q
a Please note that reasonable steps may include actions such as limiting access to the property, monitoring
known contaminants and complying with state and/or local requirements. The steps taken to prevent or
limit exposure to previously released hazardous substances may depend, for example, on such things as
the location of the site in relation to the public and whether the public has been known to use (or even
,..�
trespass on) the site.
24
Packet Pg. 2271
16.G.3.e
of the state determination letter as an attachment to 'your proposal. If the state does not
make the determination before the proposal due date or is unable to make the
determination, please attach a copy of the request you sent to the state. (Note: You must
provide EPA with the date you requested your state to make the petroleum site
determination. EPA will make the petroleum site eligibility determination if a state is
unable to do so following a request from an applicant.) Also in your letter to the state,
please request that the state provides information regarding whether it applied EPA's
guidelines in making the petroleum determination, or if not, what standard it applied.
Tribal applicants must submit the information required for a petroleum site eligibility
determination (listed below) as an attachment to your proposal. EPA will make the
petroleum site eligibility determinations for tribes.
(1) Information Required for a Petroleum Site Eligibility Determination
a. Current and Immediate Past Owners Identify the current and immediate past owner
of the site. For purposes of petroleum eligibility determinations in these guidelines
only, the current owner is the entity that will own the site at time of proposal
submission.
b. Acquisition of Site Identify when and by what method the current owner acquired LO
the property (e.g., purchase, tax foreclosure, donation, eminent domain). N
c. No Responsible Party for the Site Identify whether the current and immediate past
owner (which includes, if applicable, the applicant): (i) dispensed or disposed of
petroleum or petroleum product contamination, or exacerbated the existing
petroleum contamination at the site; and (ii) owned the site when any dispensing or
disposal of petroleum (by others) took place; and (iii) took reasonable steps with
regard to the contamination at the site.
d. Assessed by a Person Not Potentially Liable Identify whether you (the applicant)
dispensed or disposed of petroleum or petroleum product, or exacerbated the
existing petroleum contamination at the site, and whether you took reasonable
steps with regard to the contamination at the site.
e. Relatively Low Risk Identify whether the site is "relatively low risk" compared to
other petroleum or petroleum product -only contaminated sites in the state in which
the site is located, including whether the site is receiving or using Leaking
Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Trust Fund monies.
f. Judgments Orders. or Third Party Suits Provide information that no responsible
party (including the applicant) is identified for the site through, either:
i) a judgment rendered in a court of law or an administrative order that would
require any person to assess, investigate, or clean up the site; or
ii) an enforcement action by federal or state authorities against any party that
would require any person to assess, investigate, or clean up the site; or
25
Packet Pg. 2272
iii) a citizen suit, contribution action, or other third -party claim brought against
the current or immediate past owner, that would, if successful, require the
assessment, investigation, or cleanup of the site.
g. Subject to RCRA Identify whether the site is subject to any order under section
9003(h) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act.
h. Financial Viability of Responsible Parties For any current or immediate past
owners identified as responsible for the contamination at the site, provide
information regarding whether they have the financial capability to satisfy their
obligations under federal or state law to assess, investigate, or clean up the site.
Note: If no responsible party is identified in c) or f) above, then the petroleum -
contaminated site may be eligible for funding. If a responsible party is identified
above, EPA or the state must next determine whether that party is viable. If any
such party is determined to be viable then the petroleum -contaminated site may
not be eligible for funding For more information, see Appendix 1.
SECTION IV. - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INFORMATION
IV.A. How to Obtain a Proposal Package
Electronic copies of these guidelines can be obtained from the EPA Brownfields Program
website at www.epa.,Q�ov/brownfields/apply-brownfields-grant-funding or through
www.grants. 2ov.
IV.B. Due Date and Submission Instructions
Your organization's Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) must submit your complete
application package electronically to EPA through www.gyrants.Qov. Proposals must be received
no later than 11:59 p.m. ET on December 20, 2016. Please allow enough time to successfully
submit your application package and allow for unexpected errors that may require you to
resubmit.
Proposals received after 11:59 p.m. ET December 20 2016 will not be considered for funding.
In order to submit a proposa14 through www.gyrants.Qov, you must:
1. Have an active DUNS number,
2. Have an active System for Award Management (SAM) account in www.sam.gov,
3. Be registered in www.2rants.Qov, and
4. Be designated as your organization's AOR.
4 Note that the terms "proposal" and "application" mean the same thing for the purposes of this competition. The
files that you submit through wAl A,.grants. ffoy as your Brownfields proposal is what is known as an application
package in www.¢rants.eov.
16.G.3.e
c
n
N
a
0
T
J
m
0
5 -
LU
J
0
Q
CL
w
0
LL
0
Z
c
U
R
26
Packet Pg. 2273
^ The registration process for all of the above items may take a month or more to complete.
Occasionally, technical and other issues arise when using www.grants.gov.
The electronic submission of your application must be made by the official representative (AOR)
of your institution who is registered with www.grants.gov and is authorized to sign applications
for federal assistance. Refer to Appendix 2 for specific instructions on the use of
www. urants. gov.
After signing and successfully submitting the application package, within 24 to 48 hours the
AOR should receive notification emails from www.grants.gov with the following subject lines:
1. GRANT###### Grants.gov Submission Receipt
2. GRANT###### Grants.gov Submission Validation Receipt for Application
If the AOR did not receive either notification emails listed above, contact the www. rants.aov
Help Desk at 1-800-518-4726. The Help Desk is open 24/7 (except federal holidays).
After the application package is retrieved out of the www.grants.gov system by EPA, the AOR
should receive the following notification emails from www.grants.gov:
3. GRANT###### Grants.gov Grantor Agency Retrieval Receipt for Application
4. GRANT###### Grants.gov Agency Tracking Number Assignment for Application
In the event that you experience difficulties transmitting the proposal through www. grants.aov,
please refer to the procedures in Appendix 2.
If you do not have the technical capability to apply electronically through www.grants.gov
because of limited or no Internet access which prevents you from being able to upload the
required application materials to www.grants.gov, please refer to the procedures in Appendix 2.
IV.C. Content and Form of Proposal
Refer to Section I.A. for information on the number of Assessment Grants and amount of
funding that may be requested. Applicants must submit separate proposals for Community -wide
and Site-specific Assessment Grants. Each proposal must stand on its own merits based on the
responses given to the relevant criteria for the type of grant submitted and must not reference
responses to criteria in another proposal.
All proposal materials must be in English. The Cover Letter and Narrative Proposal must be
typed, on letter -sized (8.5 x 11 -inch) paper, and use standard Times New Roman, Arial, or
Calibri fonts with a 12 -point font size and 1 -inch margins. While these guidelines establish
the font and minimum type size requirements, applicants are advised that readability is very
important.
The following checklist reflects the documents required for proposals. All proposals must
contain a completed and signed SF -424; a Cover Letter; a Narrative Proposal, limited to 15 typed
pages; and required attachments, as listed below. Extraneous materials will not be considered.
27
16.G.3.e
Packet Pg 2274
16G.3.e '
5t Standard Form 424, Application for Federal Assistance, with original signature (no
page limit (see Section IV.C.1.)
d' Cover Letter (2 -page limit) (see Section IV.C.2.)
8t Cover Letter Attachments:
o Regional Priorities Form (located in Appendix 3), if applicable (see Section
IV.C.2.g.)
o Other Factors Checklist (located in Appendix 3), if applicable (see Section
IV.C.2.g.)
o Letter from the state or tribal environmental authority (see Section IV.C.2.h.)
it The Narrative Proposal, which includes the responses to ranking criteria (15 -page limit)
(see Section IV.C.3.)
d Narrative Proposal Attachments:
o Documentation indicating committed firm leveraged resources, if applicable (see
Section IV.C.3.2.c.)
o Letters of commitment from all community organizations identified in the
Partnerships with Community Organizations ranking criterion (see Section
IV.C.3.3.c.ii.)
M� Documentation of all applicable threshold criteria (see Section III.B.)
o Documentation of applicant eligibility if other than city, county, state, or tribe (see
Section III.B.I.)
o Letters of commitment from assessment coalition members, if applicable (see
Section III.B.1.)
o Property -Specific Determination request, if applicable (see Section III.C.5.)
o Petroleum eligibility determination information, if applicable (see Section
III.C.6.(b))
o Justification for requested waiver of the $200,000 limit for a Site-specific
Assessment, if applicable (see Section 1.A.2.)
1. Standard Form (SF) - 424, Application for Federal Assistance (with original signature)
www.arants.gov will automatically prompt applicants to submit the SF -424 form.
2. Cover Letter
The cover letter shall identify the applicant and a contact for communication with EPA. The
cover letter, including the applicant identification information shall not exceed two single-
spaced pages. Any pages submitted over the page limit will not be considered. The cover
letter must be on the applicant's official letterhead, and signed by an official with the
authority to commit your organization to the proposed project. Applicants are to submit
separate cover letters for each proposal they submit. EPA does not consider information in
cover letters to be responses to the ranking criteria. Each cover letter should be addressed to
the Regional Brownfields Contact listed in Section VII. and include the items listed below.
a. Applicant Identification Provide the name and full address of the entity applying for
funds. This is the agency or organization that will be receiving the grant and will be
accountable to EPA for the proper expenditure of funds.
28
''Packet Pg. 2275
b. Funding Requested
i) Grant Type Indicate "Assessment."
ii) Assessment Grant Type Indicate "Community -wide," "Site-specific" or "Coalition."
iii) Federal Funds Requested $ and whether you are requesting a waiver for a
Site-specific proposal (please refer to funding limitations for each grant type).
iv) Contamination Indicate "Hazardous Substances," "Petroleum" or both.
Note: If both, provide a breakdown of the amount of funding you are requesting by
contaminant type (e.g., $150,000 hazardous substances and $150,000 petroleum).
c. Location City, county, and state or reservation, tribally owned lands, tribal fee lands, etc.,
of the brownfields community(ies) that you propose to serve. For Assessment Coalition
Grants, list all jurisdictions covered under the proposal.
d. Property Information for Site -Specific Proposals Please provide the property name and
complete site address, including zip code.
e. Contacts
i) Project Director Provide name, phone number, email address, and mailing address of
the Project Director assigned to this proposed project. This person should be the main
point of contact for the project, and should be the person responsible for the project's
day-to-day operations. The Project Director may be contacted if other information is
needed.
Chief Executive/Hi�hest Ranking Elected Official Provide the name, phone number,
email address, and mailing address of the applicant's Chief Executive or highest
ranking elected official. For example, if your organization is a municipal form of
government, provide this information for the Mayor or County Commissioner.
Otherwise, provide this information for your organization's Executive Director or
President. These individuals may be contacted if other information is needed.
f. Population
i) Provide the general population of your jurisdiction and the jurisdictions of any
coalition partners, if applicable.
ii) If you are not a municipal form of government, provide the population of the
municipality of the identified target area(s). Tribes must provide the number of
tribal/non-tribal members affected. Your jurisdiction's population can be found at
www.census. goy/.
Affirm whether or not your jurisdiction is located within, or includes, a county
experiencing "persistent poverty" where 20% or more of its population has lived in
poverty over the past 30 years, as measured by the 1990 and 2000 decennial censuses
and the most recent Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates.
29
16.G.3.e'
Packet Pg. 2276'
g. Regional Priorities Form/Other Factors Checklist Attach the Regional Priority
Form/Other Factors Checklist in Appendix 3 to the Cover Letter identifying which, if
any, of the items are applicable to your proposal. The Regional Priority Form/Other
Factors Checklist does not count towards the two-page limit for this section.
h. Letter from the State or Tribal Environmental Authority
For an applicant other than a state or tribal environmental authority, attach a current letter
from the appropriate state or tribal environmental authority acknowledging that the
applicant plans to conduct assessment activities and is planning to apply for federal grant
funds. Letters re arding proposals from prior years are not acceptable.
If you are applying for multiple types of grants, you need to receive only one letter
acknowledging the relevant grant activities. However, you must provide a copy of this
letter as an attachment to each proposal. Please note that general correspondence and
documents evidencing state involvement with the project (i.e., state enforcement orders
or state notice letters) are not acceptable. Coordinate early with your state or tribal
environmental authority in order to allow adequate time for you to obtain the
acknowledgment letter and attach it to your proposal.
The letter from the state or tribal authority does not count towards the two-page limit for
this section.
3. The Narrative Proposal/Ranking Criteria
The narrative proposal (including citations) shall not exceed 15 single-spaced pages. Any
pages submitted over the page limit will not be evaluated.
The narrative proposal must include clear, concise, and factual responses to all ranking
criteria and sub -criteria and address, if applicable, the Regional Priority(ies) (see Section I.F.)
for the region in which the project is located. Proposals must provide sufficient detail to
allow for an evaluation of the merits of the proposal. Any criterion left unanswered may
result in zero points given for that criterion. Responses to the criteria should include the
criteria number and title but need not restate the entire text of the criteria.
1. COMMUNITY NEED
This section of your proposal provides the context for your project. The needs defined in
this section should provide the foundation for your later discussion of the brownfields
project, planned community engagement and partnerships, and the ways the project will
ultimately benefit your community.
a. Target Area and Brownfields
i. Community and Target Area Descriptions
Include a brief description of your city, town, or geographic area to provide the reader
some background on its cultural and industrial history that establishes the context for
your brownfield challenges.
30
16.G.3.e
N
N
T_
d
v
co
T
J
m
O
w
J
O
0 -
Li
O
U_
O
Z
c
a�
U
t4
Q
Packet Pg. 2277
16.G,3.e
^ Within this larger geographic area, identify and describe a specific area where you
plan to perform assessment activities; such as a neighborhood, district, corridor,
census tract, or other locality. Depending on the scope and design of your project, one
or more target areas may be presented.
ii. Demographic Information and Indicators of Need
Provide and compare census -based demographic data as requested in the table below
Use additional rows or text, as needed, to include other data or information, which
provide a compelling explanation for why you selected the target area. Responses
should clearly identify sources of information used.
Sam le Format for Demographic Information (supplement as ap ro riate)
For resources to gather demographic information, please go the FAQs at
www.gpa.Uov/sites/production/files/2016-08/docunients/fyl7 fags.pdf.
iii. Brownfields and Their Impacts
Describe the actual brownfields sites in your target area(s) and highlight sites that are
a priority. Include information on the:
• brownfields' proximity to residents in the target area;
• nature and extent of your brownfields (such as past land uses and site activities,
potentially related environmental issues or contaminants, and current conditions);
and
• real or perceived negative environmental impacts associated with the brownfields.
b. Welfare, Environmental, and Public Health Impacts
Please provide information on the welfare impacts in your target area(s).
i. Welfare Impacts
Discuss the welfare issues experienced by the target area. (For example: blight, safety
31
Packet Pg 2278
Target Area (e.g.,
City/Town or
Statewide
National
Census Tract)
County
Population:
314,107,084'
Unemployment:
5.0%2
Poverty Rate:
15.6%
Percent Minority:
37.2%1
Median Household
$53,4823
Income:
Other:
Include other relevant
data as needed in
additional rows
'Data are from the 2014 American Community Survey data profile and are available on American FactFinder at
httn //factfinder census gov/Faces/tableservices/isfoages/produetview xhtmhpid=ACS 14 5YR DP05&src=pt
2Data are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (The Employment Situation — March 2016) and are available at
http://www.bis.00v/news.release/pdf/el-n]2sit.pdf
;Data are from the 2014 American Community Survey data profile and are available on American FactFinder at
httn://factfmder.census. ov/faces/tableseivices/sf/ ages/.roduetview.xhtml? id=ACS 14 5YR DP03&src= t.
For resources to gather demographic information, please go the FAQs at
www.gpa.Uov/sites/production/files/2016-08/docunients/fyl7 fags.pdf.
iii. Brownfields and Their Impacts
Describe the actual brownfields sites in your target area(s) and highlight sites that are
a priority. Include information on the:
• brownfields' proximity to residents in the target area;
• nature and extent of your brownfields (such as past land uses and site activities,
potentially related environmental issues or contaminants, and current conditions);
and
• real or perceived negative environmental impacts associated with the brownfields.
b. Welfare, Environmental, and Public Health Impacts
Please provide information on the welfare impacts in your target area(s).
i. Welfare Impacts
Discuss the welfare issues experienced by the target area. (For example: blight, safety
31
Packet Pg 2278
concerns, lack of access to community services, lack of transportation services, etc.)
Please provide information on the environmental and public health impacts in your
community(ies).
ii. Cumulative Environmental Issues
In addition to the presence of brownfield sites discussed earlier, provide a summary
(using available information) of other various cumulative environmental issues (e.g.
siting of power plants, incinerators, industry, landfills, congested highways, or other
sources of air, water and land pollution) or other environmental justice concerns (such
as overburdening from existing sources of pollution) which may be present.
iii. Cumulative Public Health Impacts
• Discuss the public health impacts from cumulative sources and brownfield sites
discussed earlier.
• Provide information describing the threats to sensitive populations who are
potentially subject to environmental exposures, including from brownfields.
(Please refer to FAQs for information on sensitive populations at
vcwvw.gpa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-08/documents/fyl7 fags pd£)
c. Financial Need
i. Economic Conditions
Describe why you, as the applicant, need this funding and are unable to draw on other
sources of funding. Explain how a small population, low income or other factors of
the target area prevent you from funding this work.
Describe how local economic conditions may have been made worse due to industrial
decline, plant closures, natural disasters, or other significant economic disruptions.
ii. Economic Effects of Brownfields
Describe the key economic effects of the brownfields discussed earlier on the target
area (e.g. reduced tax base, lost business opportunities, depressed property values,
burden on municipal services, etc.). To the extent that this discussion may include
quantitative estimates and statistics, clearly cite the sources of such data.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND FEASIBILITY OF SUCCESS
This section of your proposal describes your project and how it will be implemented.
This section should demonstrate the feasibility of the project you will fund with this grant
and the extent to which the grant will stimulate the availability of other funds for
environmental assessment or remediation, and the subsequent reuse of the target area in
which the brownfield site(s) is located.
Refer to Section VI.D., Brownfields Programmatic Requirements, to read EPA
expectations of projects funded with Brownfields Assessment Grants.
32
16.G.3.e
C
h
N
f
a�
0
Co
r
J
m
0
r -
w
J
0
n.
LU
O
U-
0
z
c
m
E
U
R
Q
Packet Pg 2279
a. Project Description, Timing and Implementation
Project Description and Alignment with Revitalization Plans
Describe the project that will be funded by this grant, how it aligns with the target
area's land use and revitalization plans, and how you will incorporate equitable
development practices or sustainable practices, such as the HUD -DOT -EPA
Livability Principles as described in Section I.E. of these guidelines.
Describe the redevelopment strategy, or projected redevelopment, for the
property(ies) that will be assessed under this grant and how you will make use of
existing infrastructure (water, sewer, transportation, etc.).
ii. Timing and Inlementation
Describe the timing and implementation of the key activities listed below to ensure
that all grant funding will be expended within three years, and describe who will be
responsible for implementing and completing the activities.
(a) Contractor procurement (including the internal steps that must be taken within
your organization and approvals from departments or elected officials).
(b) For Community -wide proposals and Assessment Coalition proposals, discuss the
development of site inventory or site identification process, and site prioritization and
selection process.
For Assessment Coalition proposals, describe the proposed governance structure
among your coalition partners which will be implemented to prioritize and select sites
to assess.
For Site-specific proposals, describe existing conditions of the property you plan to
assess with this funding.
(c) Obtaining and securing site access.
b. Task Descriptions and Budget Table
Task Descriptions
List the tasks required to implement the proposed project, distinguishing between the
work you and your contractors will be performing, under each grant -funded task. If
any additional work or services are necessary to carry out the project that will be
funded by sources other than this grant, such as in-kind staff hours, please discuss
how those tasks will be funded.
Describe and enumerate specific outputs from the project, which may include, but are
not limited to, site inventories, Phase I environmental site assessments, Phase II
environmental site assessments, site cleanup plans, area -wide plans or community
meetings. (Refer to Section I.D.I. for an explanation of outputs.)
33
16.G,3.e
Packet Pg. 2280,
Provide a cost estimate for each grant -funded task. Describe the basis for how each
line item cost estimate was developed under each budget category shown in the table
below. Applicants requesting hazardous substances and petroleum funding in the
same proposal must distinguish hazardous substances related tasks from petroleum
related tasks. Where appropriate, present unit costs and quantify work products (e.g.,
Contractual Costs: Conduct Phase I assessments on five sites at a cost of $2,500 each
for a total of $12,500). Explain any costs that appear to be atypical (i.e., unusually
high or low).
Do not include tasks for activities that are ineligible uses of funds under EPA's
Assessment Grant (e.g., land acquisition; building demolition that is not necessary to
assess contamination at the site; building or site preparation; or administrative costs,
such as indirect costs). Please refer to the Brownfields FAQs at
www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-08/documents/fv17 fags pdf for additional
examples of ineligible uses of funds. For questions not covered by the FAQs, contact
your Regional Brownfields Contact listed in Section VII.
ii. Budget Table
The table format below can be used to present the allocation of EPA grant funds to
the specific tasks described above. Specify the costs by budget category. INCLUDE
ONLY EPA GRANT FUNDS IN THIS TABLE. Activities not supported by the
grant (i.e. in-kind contributions) should not be included in the budget table.
Applicants requesting hazardous substances and petroleum funding in the same
proposal must provide either two separate budget tables, or two separate line items
within one budget table which distinguish hazardous substances funds from
petroleum funds.
Note: EPA encourages the use of the table format below and replacing the task
number outlined in the table with the actual title of the task.
Sample Format for Budget
Budget Categories J(Task
Project Tasks ($) (programmatic costs only)
1)
(Task 2)
(Task 3)
(Task 4)
Total
Personnel
Fringe Benefits
Travel'
Equipment'
Supplies
Contractual
Other (specify)
34
16.G.3.e
h
N
a
0
co
o:
J
m
0
LU
J
0
Q
n.
W
0
U.
0
Z
M
m
U
R
Packet Pg. 2281
Total Budget
I Travel to brownfields-related training conferences is an acceptable use of these grant funds.
'- EPA defines equipment as items that cost $5,000 or more with a useful life of more than one year.
Items costing less than $5,000 are considered supplies. Generally, equipment is not required for
Assessment Grants.
Reminder: Administrative costs, such as indirect costs, of grant administration with the exception of
financial and performance reporting costs are ineligible grant activities.
c. Ability to Leverage
Describe other sources of funding or resources that you have, or may be seeking, to
ensure the successful revitalization of brownfields sites assessed with this grant. This
should include public or private resources (beyond this grant) you expect to utilize to
achieve the assessment, cleanup, and/or redevelopment needs of the brownfields sites
Attach copies of any letters or documentation that substantiate firm commitments of
leveraged funding.
If you are not yet able to identify sources of leveraged funding needed for this project,
then provide a recent example where you, or your project partners, have successfully
leveraged resources to achieve an environmental or revitalization goal of your
community (not necessarily on a brownfields site). See the Brownfields FAQs at
NVWW.epa.gov/sites/,production/files/2016-08/documents/fv]7 fags.pdf for more
information on how to demonstrate leveraging commitments.
3. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIPS
This section of your proposal explains how your proposed community engagement plan
will meet the needs of the community in the target area identified in the Community
Need (Section IV.C.3.1.) portion of your proposal and identifies the stakeholders and
partners necessary to achieve the benefits discussed in the Project Benefits section
(Section W.C.3.4.).
a. Engaging the Community
Community Involvement Plan
Discuss your plan for involving the community in the target area and other
stakeholders (such as neighborhood organizations, citizen groups, property owners,
lenders, business organizations and developers) in the planning and implementation
of your project (which may include project planning, site selection for assessments,
cleanup decisions, and reuse planning).
ii. Communicating Progress
Describe your plans for communicating the progress of your project to community
members. Also, describe how the identified communication plans are appropriate and
effective for the community(ies) in the target area(s).
35
16;G.3.e'
Packet 3. 2282
Note: Applicants may address this criterion by various means that show meaningful
public engagement where information is shared and views and input are actively
solicited, including public meetings, webinars, use of media, and Internet forums.
Applicants must demonstrate how they will engage the community in the target area
in meaningful ways to ensure the success of the proposed project.
b. Partnerships with Government Agencies
i. Local/State/Tribal Environmental Authority
Identify and provide information on the agency which runs the relevant brownfields,
voluntary cleanup or another similar program at the local/state/tribal level (i.e., the
environmental agency and/or health agency), and describe the role they may play to
ensure your brownfields project is successful.
ii. Other Governmental Partnerships
Identify and provide information on other relevant federal, state, and/or local
governmental agencies with which you will partner during your assessment project
(e.g., DOT, HUD, a health agency), and describe the role they may play to ensure
your brownfields project is successful.
c. Partnerships with Community Organizations
i. Community Organization Description & Role
Include a description of each community organization involved in your project, as
well as their role in and commitments to the planning and implementation of the
project.
If there are no community organizations in your community, then state this and
discuss how the community is engaged and will continue to be involved in your
proj ect.
Note: Community organizations do not include local government departments, the
local planning department/district/office, local contractors, the mayor's office, or
other elected officials. See FAQs at www.el2a.!�ov/sites/production/files/2016-
08/documents/fy17 fags pdf for more information about community organizations
Note: The numbers of partners is not as important as the contributions and the
relevance of their organization.
Note: EPA may conduct reference checks to ensure that organizations identified are
supportive and involved with the brownfields project.
ii. Letters of Commitment
Attach to the proposal current letters from all of the community organizations you
have discussed. These letters should discuss their support for the project, and describe
36
In
N
C
n
N
W
0
co
T
J
Cf1
0
2
UJ
J
0
0 -
UJ
0
LL
0
Z
El
Packet Pg. 2283
^ and affirm their roles and commitments to the planning and implementation of the
project.
If there are no community organizations in your community, then provide
documentation to demonstrate that the community is engaged and will continue to be
involved in your project. This can be done by attaching support or commitment letters
from residents, letters from residents to the editors of local newspapers, attendance
lists at public meetings concerning the project, comments from local citizens received
on the plans and implementation of the project, etc.
Note: Letters of commitment and supporting documentation must be addressed to the
applicant and be included with the applicant's proposal package. Letters should not
be sent directly to EPA.
d. Partnerships with Workforce Development Programs
Describe planned efforts to promote local hiring and procurement or link members of
the community to potential employment opportunities in brownfields assessment,
cleanup, or redevelopment related to your proposed projects. Such efforts may
include, but are not limited to, partnering with local workforce development entities
or Brownfields job training grantees. A list of Brownfields job training grantees can
be found at
cfpub.0a.gov/bf factsheets/# Qa=1.179644452.1468935873.1432832844.
4. PROJECT BENEFITS
This section of your proposal describes the anticipated outcomes and benefits expected
from your project in the context of the needs you discussed in the Community Need
section (Section IV.C.3.1.).
a. Welfare, Environmental, and Public Health Benefits
Describe the future welfare, environmental, and public health benefits anticipated
from this grant (or broader project), and how these benefits will address the
challenges and sensitive populations discussed in the Community Need section of
your narrative (Section IV.C.3.1.).
b. Economic and Community Benefits
Relative to challenges identified in the Community Need section and your project
proposed in the Project Description section, discuss potential outcomes and the
economic benefits, non -economic benefits, and other community benefits (be specific
and provide quantitative estimates when possible), which may be achieved through
the redevelopment of sites assessed under this grant, and how these benefits align
with community revitalization plans.
Economic benefits may include: increased employment and expanded tax base. Non-
economic and community benefits may include: areas redeveloped for uses such as
37
16.G.3.e
Packet Pg. 2284`
parks, recreation areas, greenways, environmental buffers and other not-for-profit,
governmental or charitable organization spaces.
5. PROGRAMMATIC CAPABILITY AND PAST PERFORMANCE
This section of your proposal demonstrates that your organization ("the applicant"/lead
coalition member) has programmatic capability (experience, knowledge and resources, or
ability to obtain them) and a reasonable approach necessary to ensure successful
completion of all required aspects of this project and grant as discussed in the previous
section of your proposal and Section VI. of these guidelines.
a. Audit Findings
Describe any adverse audit findings. If you have had problems with the
administration of any grants (e.g., compliance reporting, expenditure of funds), please
describe how you have corrected, or are correcting, the problems. If you have not,
please affirm that you have not had any adverse audit findings. Respond to this
criterion regardless of whether or not you have had a federal or non-federal assistance
agreement. (Failure to address this section may result in zero points for this factor.)
b. Programmatic Capability
Describe the organizational structure you will utilize to ensure the timely and
successful expenditure of funds and completion of all technical, administrative and
financial requirements of the project and grant. Include a brief discussion of the key
staff including their roles, expertise, qualifications and experience.
Describe the system(s) you have in place to appropriately acquire any additional
expertise and resources (e.g. contractors or subawardees) required to successfully
complete the project. Please refer to Section IV.E. regarding contractors and
subawards.
c. Measuring Environmental Results: Anticipated Outputs/Outcomes
Discuss how you plan to track, measure and evaluate your progress in achieving
project outcomes, outputs and project results. (Refer to Section I.D.1. for an
explanation of outputs.)
d. Past Performance and Accomplishments
If you have ever received an EPA Brownfields Grant (including Assessment, Cleanup,
Revolving Loan Fund, and 128(a) grants; but excluding Targeted Brownfields
Assessments, Area -Wide Planning grants, Environmental Workforce Development & Job
Training grants, and subawards from another Brownfields grantee), please respond to
item i. below.
16.G.3.e
C
N
N
r
d
7
0
co
J
m
0
a
w
J
0
Q
a
UJ
0
1
0
Z
c
c�
U
Q
Packet Pg. 2285
^ If you have never received an EPA Brownfields Grant, but have received other federal or
non-federal assistance agreements (such as a grant or cooperative agreement), please
respond to item ii. below.
If you have never received any type of federal or non-federal assistance agreements,
please indicate this in response to item iii. below.
i. Currently or Has Ever Received an EPA Brownfields Grant
Identify and provide information regarding each of your current and most recent EPA
brownfields grant(s) (but no more than five). Demonstrate how you successfully
managed the grant(s), and successfully performed all phases of work under each grant
by providing information on the items listed below.
1. Accomplishments
Describe the accomplishments (including specific outputs and outcomes) of your
grant funded program, including at minimum, the number of sites assessed and/or
cleaned up. Discuss whether these outputs and outcomes were accurately reflected
in the Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) at
the time of this proposal submission, and if not, please explain why.
2. Compliance with Grant Requirements
Discuss your compliance with the work plan, schedule and terms and conditions.
Include whether you have made, or are making, progress towards achieving the
expected results of the grant in a timely manner. If not, discuss what corrective
measures you took, or are taking, and how the corrective measures were effective,
documented and communicated.
Discuss your history of timely and acceptable quarterly performance and grant
deliverables, as well as, ongoing ACRES reporting.
Please explain your need for additional funding. Additionally, for all open EPA
Brownfields grant(s) indicate the grant period (start and end date), if there are
funds remaining, and the plan to expend funds by the end of the grant period.
For all closed EPA Brownfields grant(s), indicate if there were funds remaining at
the time of closure, the amount of remaining funds, and a brief explanation of
why the funds were not expended.
ii. Has Not Received an EPA Brownfields Grant but has Received Other Federal
or Non -Federal Assistance Agreements
Identify and describe each of your current and/or most recent federally and non -
federally funded grants (no more than five) that are most similar in size, scope, and
relevance to the proposed project. Demonstrate how you successfully managed the
grant(s), and successfully performed all phases of work under each grant by
providing the following information.
39
16G.3.e
Packet Pg. 2286
16.G.3.e
1. Purpose and Accomplishments --�
Describe the awarding agency/organization, amount of funding, and purpose of
the grant(s) you have received.
Discuss the accomplishments (including specific outputs and outcomes) of the
project supported by these grants, including specific measures of success for the
project supported by each type of grant received.
2. Compliance with Grant Requirements
Describe your compliance with the work plan, schedule and terms and conditions.
Include whether you made, or are making, progress towards achieving the
expected results of the grant in a timely manner. If not, discuss what corrective
measures you took, or are taking, and how the corrective measures effective, were
documented and communicated.
Discuss your history of timely and acceptable reporting, as required by the
awarding agency/organization.
iii. Has Never Received Anv Tvpe of Federal or Non -Federal Assistance Agreements
W
Affirm that your organization has never received any type of federal or non-federal
to
assistance agreement (grant). (Failure to indicate anything in response may result in
Zero points for this factor.)
IV.D. Intergovernmental Review
0
N
N
The State Intergovernmental Review process will be needed if you are selected to receive aco
m
o
grant. As appropriate for your state, applicants are encouraged to contact their State
Intergovernmental Review Office early to start the required intergovernmental review process.
r-
This effort is separate from the required state environmental letter attachment (see Section
Of
J
IV.C.21.). Contact your Regional Brownfields Contact listed in Section VII. for assistance.
0°
O
IV.E. Voluntary Cost Share/Leveraging
LU
o
Matching funds are not required under this competition. Although cost sharing or matching
Q
LU
is not required as a condition of eligibility under this competition, under Section V.A.2.c. of this
LU
O
announcement, EPA will evaluate proposals' responses to the Ability to Leveraging criterion.
p
Leveraging is generally when an applicant proposes to provide its own additional
Z
funds/resources or those from third -party sources to support or complement the project they are
a
awarded under the competition which are above and beyond the EPA grant funds awarded. Any
E
leveraged funds/resources, and their source, must be identified in the proposal. Leveraged funds
o
and resources may take various forms as noted below.
Q
Voluntary cost share is a form of leveraging. Voluntary cost sharing is when an applicant
voluntarily proposes to legally commit to provide costs or contributions to support the project
when a cost share is not required. Applicants who propose to use a voluntary cost share must
40
Packet Pg. 2287'
include the costs or contributions for the voluntary cost share in the project budget on the SF -
424. If an applicant proposes a voluntary cost share, the following apply:
• A voluntary cost share is subject to the match provisions in the grant regulations (2 CFR
200.306, as applicable).
• A voluntary cost share may only be met with eligible and allowable costs.
• The recipient may not use other sources of federal funds to meet a voluntary cost share
unless the statute authorizing the other federal funding provides that the federal funds
may be used to meet a cost share requirement on a federal grant.
• The recipient is legally obligated to meet any proposed voluntary cost share that is
included in the approved project budget. If the proposed voluntary cost share does not
materialize during grant performance, then EPA may reconsider the legitimacy of the
award and/or take other appropriate action as authorized by 2 CFR 200.338.
Other leveraged funding/resources that are not identified as a voluntary cost share. This
form of leveraging may be met by funding from another federal grant, from an applicant's own
resources, or resources from other third party sources. This form of leveraging should not be
included in the budget and the costs need not be eligible and allowable project costs under the
EPA assistance agreement. While this form of leveraging should not be included in the budget,
the grant work plan should include a statement indicating that the applicant is expected to
produce the proposed leveraging consistent with the terms of the announcement and the
applicant's proposal. If applicants propose to provide this form of leveraging, EPA expects them
to make the effort to secure the leveraged resources described in their proposals. If the proposed
leveraging does not materialize during grant performance, then EPA may reconsider the
legitimacy of the award and/or take other appropriate action as authorized by 2 CFR Parts 200 or
1500.
IV.F. Additional Provisions for Applicants Incorporated Into the Solicitation
Additional provisions that apply to this solicitation and/or awards made under this solicitation,
including but not limited to those related to confidential business information, contracts and
subawards under grants, and proposal assistance and communications, can be found at EPA
Solicitation Clauses. These, and the other provisions that can be found at the website link, are
important, and applicants must review them when preparing proposals for this solicitation. If
you are unable to access these provisions electronically at the website above, please
communicate with the EPA contact listed in this solicitation to obtain the provisions.
SECTION V. - PROPOSAL REVIEW INFORMATION
V.A. Evaluation Criteria
If your proposal passes the threshold eligibility review (see Section III.B.), your responses and
the information you provide in response to the ranking criteria below will be evaluated and
scored by a national evaluation panel. Your proposal may be assigned up to 200 points.
41
16.G.3.e
Packet Pg. 2288
Criteria (Maximum Points per Criterion)
1. COMMUNITY NEED (45 Points)
Your proposal will be evaluated on the quality and extent to which it:
- demonstrates a compelling picture of need in the community, and specifically, the
identified target area; and
- makes a connection between the public health, welfare, environmental, and/or economic
challenges faced by the community and/or target area and the presence of brownfield
sites and other cumulative environmental issues.
EPA anticipates selecting proposals from communities experiencing significant socio-economic
challenges (e.g., high percent low-income, high percent poverty, increased health disparities).
Assessment Coalition proposals should demonstrate how the grant will serve coalition
partners and communities that would otherwise not have access to resources to address
brownfields. For example, a state or county may put together a coalition that includes small
communities that do not have the capacity to apply for brownfields funding on their own.
Specifically, this criterion will evaluate the quality and extent to which you clearly, concisely
and realistically address the following in the proposal:
La. Target Area and Brownfields (15 points)
l .a.i. Community and Target Area Descriptions (5 points)
The depth and degree of brownfield challenges confronting your city/town/geographic area and
the specific area where you plan to perform assessment activities.
l.a.ii. Demographic Information and Indicators of Need (5 tioints
How well the information provided supports and demonstrates the compelling need of the
community based on demographic information on your target area(s) as compared to larger
geographic areas (e.g. city, county, state, and national), and the validity of source(s) of
information used.
l .a.iii. Brownfields and Their Impacts (5 points)
The impact of actual brownfields sites in your target area(s), how these sites will be prioritized,
and how well you connected the impact of the brownfield sites' proximity to residents in the
target area, the nature and extent of the brownfields, and real or perceived negative
environmental impacts associated with the brownfields to the community.
Lb. Welfare, Environmental, and Public Health Impacts (15 points)
l.b.i. Welfare Impacts (5 points)
The amount or impact of welfare issues experienced by the target area.
42
16.G.3.e
c
N
N
T"
0
T_
J
m
0
LU
J
0
Q
n.
LU
0
U_
0
Z
2
Packet Pg. 2289
Lb -ii. Cumulative Environmental Issues (5 points)
The amount or impact of other various cumulative environmental issues or other environmental
justice concerns which may be present.
1 b.iii. Cumulative Public Health Impacts (5 points)
The amount or effect of public health impacts from cumulative sources, including brownfield
sites including threats to sensitive populations who are potentially subject to environmental
exposures, including those from brownfields.
Le. Financial Need (15 points)
l.c.i. Economic Conditions (5 points)
The demonstrated need of the applicant for this funding and their inability to draw on other
sources of funding and how the local economic conditions may have been made worse due to
significant economic disruptions.
l.c.ii. Economic Effects of Brownfields (10 points)
The demonstrated economic effects of the brownfields on the target area and the
identification/validity of data sources used.
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND FEASIBILITY OF SUCCESS (55 Points)
Your proposal will be evaluated, as further described below, on the quality and extent to which
it demonstrates:
- how your project will further the target community's land use and revitalization plans or
vision;
- how your project will incorporate equitable or sustainable practices;
- a reasonable approach and methodology to achieve project goals, and expend funds in a
timely and effective manner;
- a realistic basis for project costs; and
- the availability of, and access to, sufficient resources to bring the site(s) assessed under
this grant to reuse.
Specifically, this criterion will evaluate the quality and extent to which you clearly, concisely
and realistically address the following in the proposal:
2.a. Project Description, Project Timing and Site Selection (30 points)
2 a i Project Description and Alignment with Revitalization Plans (17 points)
The merits of the project that will be funded under this grant, how well it aligns with the target
area's land use and revitalization plans, and how well it incorporates equitable development
practices or sustainable practices in a meaningful way.
43
�16:G.3.e
Packet Pg. 2290
The redevelopment strategy, or projected redevelopment, for the property(ies) that will be
assessed under this grant and how you will make use of existing infrastructure.
2.a.ii. Timing; and Implementation (13 points)
The quality and reasonableness of your plan for the timely implementation of the key activities
listed below to ensure that all grant funding will be expended within three years, and who will
be responsible for implementing and completing the activities.
(a) Contractor procurement (including the internal steps that must be taken within your
organization and approvals from departments or elected officials). (3 points)
(b) For Community -wide proposals and Assessment Coalition proposals, the development
of site inventory or site identification process, and site prioritization and selection process.
(5 points)
For Assessment Coalition proposals, a clear governance structure among your coalition
partners which will be implemented to prioritize and select sites to assess. (5 points)
For Site-specific proposals, the existing conditions of the property you plan to assess with
this funding. (5 points)
(c) Obtaining and securing site access. (5 points)
2.b. Task Descriptions and Budget Table (20 points)
2.b.i. Task Descriptions (15 points)
All proposals will be evaluated on the extent to which the majority of grant funds are allocated
for tasks directly associated with environmental site assessments.
Site-specific proposals will be evaluated on whether the amount of funding requested is needed
for the proposed site.
Assessment Coalition proposals will be evaluated to the extent the grant funds will address a
minimum of five sites as well as sites located in each coalition member's jurisdiction.
How clearly you demonstrate the activities and tasks support the overall narrative proposal and
are eligible under EPA's Assessment Grant Program, are a reasonable approach to
implementing the proposed project, and clearly explain and distinguish between the work you
and your contractors will be performing under each grant -funded task. If any additional work or
services are necessary to carry out the project that will be funded by sources other than this
grant, how clearly you identify and discuss how those tasks will be funded.
The quality of the specific project outputs, how closely the outputs correlate with the described
project, and how likely the outputs will be achieved.
M,
16.G.3.e
c
h
N
r
0
CO
J
CO
O
UJ
J
O
Q
Q
LU
O
LL
O
Z
c
E
w
2
Packet Pg 2291
How good your budget is and how efficiently you plan to use the grant funds. To the extent you
present a realistic cost estimate for each grant -funded task, include a clear and reasonable
basis for how each line item cost estimate was developed under each budget category shown in
the budget table, clearly distinguish between hazardous substances and petroleum funding when
requested in the same proposal (where appropriate), present unit costs and quantify work
products, and explain any costs that appear to be atypical.
2.b.ii. Budget Table (_5 points)
The budget table only includes eligible and allowable EPA Assessment Grant funds, clearly
distinguishes any hazardous substances funds from petroleum funds (when appropriate), totals
add up correctly, and correlates with work discussed in the Task Descriptions section.
2.e. Ability to Leverage (5 points)
The amount and relevancy to the assessment project of any leveraged funding. (Note, firm
leveraged funding that is very relevant to the assessment project will be evaluated more
favorably than potential leveraged funding or leveraged funding less relevant to the assessment
project.)
3. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIPS (35 Points)
Your proposal will be evaluated on the quality and extent to which it:
- demonstrates actions or plans to effectively involve and inform the target community and
relevant stakeholders;
- identifies the relevancy of the local/state/tribal environmental authority to the project;
- identifies roles of other relevant governmental partnerships; and
- identifies the relevant roles of community organizations and affirms their involvement in
the project through commitment letters.
This criterion will evaluate the quality and extent to which you clearly, concisely and
realistically address the following in the proposal:
3.a. Engaging the Community (15 points)
3.a.i. Community Involvement Plan 0 0 points)
Community -wide proposals should demonstrate how the whole community, not just localized
groups directly affected by a site or sites, has provided input from the project inception and will
be engaged throughout the project.
Site-specific proposals should discuss and demonstrate meaningful efforts to involve and
inform community groups or representatives directly affected by the site, in addition to the
broader community.
45
16;G.3.e
Packet Pg. 2292`
Assessment Coalition proposals should demonstrate how all communities addressed through
this project have provided input from the beginning of the project, and will be engaged and
informed throughout the project. Assessment Coalition proposals should demonstrate that the
grant recipient will ensure that community engagement is tailored specifically to the needs of
each target community and coalition member.
The quality of your plan for involving the community and other stakeholders in the target area
in the planning and implementation of your project and how effective it will be in achieving
meaningful community engagement.
3.a.ii. Communicating Progress (5 Doints)
The effectiveness and appropriateness of your plan and outreach methods in ensuring the
community(ies) in the target area are aware and involved in the progress of the project.
3.b. Partnerships with Government Agencies (9 points)
3.b.i. Local/State/Tribal Environmental Authority (5op ints)
Whether or not you are engaging and partnering with the agency which runs the relevant
brownfields, voluntary cleanup or another similar program at the local/state/tribal level, what
that engagement looks like including their role and how the partnership will contribute to the
success of your brownfields project.
3.b.ii. Other Governmental Partnerships (4 points)
Whether or not you are engaging and partnering with federal, state, and/or local governmental
agencies that may be relevant to your assessment project, what that engagement looks like,
including their roles, and how these partnerships will contribute to the success of your
brownfields project.
3.c. Partnerships with Community Organizations (9 points)
3.c.i. Community Organization Description & Role (5points)
Whether or not you are engaging with community organizations that are relevant to the
proposed project, how varied and specific their roles in and commitments to the planning and
implementation of the project, and how these partnerships will contribute to the success of your
brownfields project.
If there are no community organizations in your community, whether or not the community is
engaged and will continue to be involved in your project in a meaningful way.
3.c.ii. Letters of Commitment (4 points
Whether or not you attach current letters from all of the relevant community organizations,
which discuss the organization's support and affirm their roles in and commitments to the
planning and implementation of the project.
If there are no community organizations in your community, whether or not you clearly
demonstrate how the community is engaged and will continue to be involved in your project
16G.3.e
O
N
N
0
co
J
m
0
2
UJ
J
0
Q
UJ
0
U-
0
Z
Y
U
M
Y
EA
Packet Pg. 2293
attaching documentation such as support letters from residents, letters from residents to the
editors of local newspapers, attendance lists at public meetings concerning the project,
comments from local citizens received on the plans and implementation of the project, etc. that
clearly indicate their participation/engagement.
3.d. Partnerships with Workforce Development Programs (2 points)
Whether or not you have a meaningful plan to promote local hiring and procurement or link
members of the community to potential employment opportunities in brownfields assessment,
cleanup, or redevelopment related to your proposed projects.
4. PROJECT BENEFITS (25 Points)
Your proposal will be evaluated on the quality and extent to which it:
- demonstrates the potential of the project, or the development plan for the project area, to
realize significant outcomes and benefits to the public health, welfare and environment
of the community;
- contributes to the community plan for the revitalization of brownfields sites; and
- stimulates economic or non -economic benefits.
Specifically, this criterion will evaluate the quality and extent to which you clearly, concisely
and realistically address the following in the proposal:
4.a. Welfare, Environmental, and Public Health Benefits (13 points)
The quality and extent of future welfare, environmental, and public health benefits anticipated
from this grant (or broader project), including how the benefits address challenges and sensitive
populations you discussed in the Community Need section of your narrative.
4.b. Economic and Community Benefits (12 points)
The quality of the specific project outcomes, whether they include quantitative and qualitative
measures, how well they address the challenges identified in the Community Need section, how
closely the outcomes correlate with the described project, and how likely the outcomes
identified will be achieved through the redevelopment of sites assessed under this grant.
5. PROGRAMMATIC CAPABILITY AND PAST PERFORMANCE (40 Points)
In evaluating an applicant's response to this criterion, in addition to the infonnation provided
by the applicant, EPA may consider relevant information from other sources including
information from EPA files and/or from other federal or non-federal grantors to verify or
supplement information provided by the applicant.
Your proposal will be evaluated on the quality and extent to which it demonstrates:
47
16.G.3.e
Packet Pg. 2294
- resolution of any audit findings;
the ability of your organization (as the applicant/lead coalition member) to successfully
manage and complete the project, considering your programmatic and administrative
capacity;
a reasonable plan to track and measure project progress; and
successful performance under past and/or current federally and/or non -federally funded
assistance agreements.
Specifically, this criterion will evaluate the quality and extent to which you clearly, concisely
and realistically address the following in the proposal:
5.a. Audit Findings (2 points)
Whether the applicant has any adverse audit findings and how they have corrected, or are
correcting, the problems.
5.b. Programmatic Capability (23 points)
How efficient and effective the organizational structure is you will utilize to ensure the timely
and successful expenditure of funds, your ability to complete all technical, administrative and
financial requirements of the project and grant and the roles, expertise, qualifications, and
experience of key staff.
How good and efficient is the system(s) you have in place to appropriately acquire any
additional expertise and resources (e.g. contractors or sub-awardees) required to successfully
complete the project.
5.c. Measuring Environmental Results: Anticipated Outputs and Outcomes (5 points)
Whether you have a reasonable plan to track, measure and evaluate your progress in achieving
project outcomes, outputs and project results.
5.d. Past Performance and Accomplishments (10 points)
5.d.i. Currentiv or Has Ever Received an EPA Brownfields Grant (10 points)
Demonstrated ability to successfully manage past EPA Brownfield Grant(s) and the successful
performance of all phases of work under each grant.
5.d.i.1. Accomplishments (5 points)
The quality of the accomplishments (including specific outputs and outcomes) of your grant
funded program, including at minimum, the number of sites assessed and/or cleaned up, and
whether these outputs and outcomes were accurately reflected in the Assessment, Cleanup and
Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) at the time of this proposal submission, and if not,
why.
16G.3.e'
W
C
N
CD
0
00
T
NTN
I.L
J
M
O
r -
w
J
O
Q
n.
w
O
U_
O
Z
c
a�
E
U
M
Q
Packet Pg. 2295
16.G.3.e
5 d i 2 Compliance with Grant Requirements (5 points)
Your compliance with the work plan, schedule and terms and conditions, and whether you have
made, or are making, progress towards achieving the expected results of the grant in a timely
manner. If you did not achieve expected results, whether or not your explanation was
reasonable and appropriate corrective measures were taken to correct the situation.
Demonstrated history of timely and acceptable quarterly performance and grant deliverables, as
well as, ongoing ACRES reporting.
Demonstrated need for additional funding and a reasonable plan to expend any existing EPA
Brownfield grant funds by the end of the grant period.
For all closed EPA Brownfields grant(s), how accurately you indicate if there were funds
remaining at the time of closure, the amount of remaining funds and whether or not you
provided a reasonable explanation of why the funds were not expended.
— OR —
5.d.ii. Has Not Received an EPA Brownfields Grant but has Received Other Federal or
Non -Federal Assistance Agreements (10 points)
Demonstrated ability to successfully manage federal or non-federal grant(s), and the
performance of all phases of work under each grant.
5 d ii.1. Purpose and Accomplishments (5op ints)
How similar in size, scope and relevance the past federal or non-federal grants identified are
and whether sufficient information was provided to make that determination.
The quality of the accomplishments (including specific outputs and outcomes) of the project
supported by these grants, including specific measures of success for the project supported by
each type of grant received.
5 d ii 2 Compliance with Grant Requirements (5 points)
Your compliance with the work plan, schedule and terms and conditions, and whether you have
made, or are making, progress towards achieving the expected results of the grant in a timely
manner. If you did not achieve expected results, whether or not your explanation was
reasonable and appropriate corrective measures were taken to correct the situation.
Demonstrated history of timely and acceptable reporting, as required by the awarding
agency/organization.
—OR -
5 d iii Has Never Received Anv Type of Federal or Non -Federal Assistance Agreements
(5 points)
Whether you affirm that your organization has never received any type of federal or non-federal
assistance agreement (grant).
Packet Pg. 2296
V.B. Considerations and Other Factors
--�
In making final selection recommendations from among the most highly ranked applicants on
each of the lists discussed in Section V.C., EPA's Selection Official may consider the following
factors if appropriate. In their proposals, applicants should provide a summary on whether and
how any of these potentially applicable other factors apply:
• the proposed assessment project advances the applicable region's regional priority(ies);
c
• fair distribution of funds between urban and non -urban areas, including an equitable
distribution to "micro" communities (those communities with populations of 10,000 or less).
0
EPA strongly encourages non -urban communities, including "micro" communities, to apply;
• the distribution of funds among EPA's ten Regions and among the states and territories;
• compliance with the 25 percent statutory petroleum funding allocation;
0
0
• whether the applicant is a federally -recognized Indian tribe or United States territory or
whether the project is assisting a tribe or territory;
• whether target brownfield sites are impacted by mine -scarred land;
o
• whether the project primarily focuses on Phase II assessments;
U
• demonstrated firm leveraging commitments for facilitating brownfield project completion by
a
identifying amounts and contributors of funding in the proposal and have included
documentation that tie directly to the project;
o
• recent (2008 or later) significant economic disruption has occurred within the community,
0°
resulting in a significant percentage loss of community jobs and tax base;
LO
• whether the applicant is one of the 24 recipients or a core partner/implementation
N,
strategy party of a "manufacturing community" designation provided by the Economic
c�
Development Administration (EDA) under the Investing in Manufacturing Communities
Partnership. Applicants must clearly demonstrate there is a nexus between their IMCP
N
designation and the proposed Brownfields activities;
a
• whether the applicant is a recipient or a core partner of HUD -DOT -EPA Partnership for
0
Sustainable Communities (PSC) grant funding or technical assistance that is directly tied to
co
the proposed Brownfields project, and can demonstrate that funding from a PSC
grant/technical assistance has or will benefit the project area; and/or
• whether the applicant is a recipient of an EPA Brownfields Area -Wide Planning grant.
0
V.C. Review and Selection Process
LU
o
Q
ua
O
U.
O
Z
w
c
m
E
U
R
w
For selection purposes, EPA's Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization (OBLR) will
Q
prepare two ranked lists of eligible proposals.
One list will be comprised of "new applicants" for brownfield agreements defined as:
• applicants who have never received an EPA Brownfields Grant, or
50
Packet Pg. 2297
''-IN • applicants who were awarded a Brownfields Grant that closed in 2008 or earlier.
A second list will be comprised of "existing and recent recipients" defined as:
• applicants who have a current Brownfields Grant, or
• applicants who were awarded a Brownfields Grant that closed in 2009 or later.
The Agency expects to select approximately 234 of the highest ranked proposals for award. Of
these selections, the Agency expects to select at least two high ranking proposals from each
region that address the Regional Priorities identified by the region in Section I.F. If among the
highest approximately 234 ranked proposals that are selected there are not at least two grants
from each region that address the regional priorities identified by the Region in Section I.F., then
the Agency intends to make additional awards until this requirement is satisfied, depending on
the number of proposals received, funding availability, the quality of proposals, and other
applicable considerations. In addition, the Agency intends to use approximately 50% of the total
amount of funding available under this announcement for grants to "new applicants." This
percentage is an estimate and is subject to change based on funding levels, the quality of
proposals received and other applicable considerations.
The Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization (OBLR) will provide both lists to the
Selection Official, who is responsible for further consideration of the proposals and final
selection of grant recipients. Proposals will be selected for award based on their evaluated point
scores, the regional priority issue described above, the availability of funds, and, if and as
appropriate, the other factors described in Section V.B.
V.D. Additional Provisions For Applicants Incorporated Into the Solicitation
Additional provisions that apply to this solicitation and/or awards made under this solicitation
including the clause on Reporting and Use of Information Concerning Recipient Integrity and
Performance can be found in the EPA Solicitation Clauses at http://www.gpa.aov/ rag nts/epa-
solicitation-clauses. These, and the other provisions that can be found at the website link, are
important, and applicants must review them when preparing proposals for this solicitation. If you
are unable to access these provisions electronically at the website above, please communicate
with the EPA contact listed in this solicitation to obtain the provisions.
SECTION VI. - AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
VLA. Award Notices
EPA Regions will notify applicants who fail threshold eligibility requirements within 15 calendar
days of the Agency's determination of ineligibility. EPA will notify applicants who have not
been selected for award based on the ranking criteria and other factors within 15 calendar days of
EPA's final decision on selections for this competition.
EPA anticipates notification to successful applicants will be made via telephone or electronic or
postal mail by Spring 2017. The notification will be sent to the original signer of the proposal or
the project contact listed in the proposal. This notification, which informs the applicant that its
proposal has been selected and is being recommended for award, is not an authorization to begin
51
16.G.3.e
Packet .22987
work. The official notification of an award will be made by Regional Grants Management
Official for regional awards. Applicants are cautioned that only a grants officer is authorized to
bind the Government to the expenditure of funds; selection does not guarantee an award will be
made. For example, statutory authorization, funding or other issues discovered during the award
process may affect the ability of EPA to make an award to an applicant. The award notice,
signed by an EPA grants officer, is the authorizing document and will be provided through
electronic or postal mail. The successful applicant may need to prepare and submit additional
documents and forms (e.g., work plan), which must be approved by EPA, before the grant can
officially be awarded. The time between notification of selection and award of a grant can take
up to 90 days or longer.
VI.B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
1. Funding will be awarded as a cooperative agreement. The applicants whose proposals are
selected will be asked to submit a cooperative agreement application package to their EPA
Regional Office. This package will include the application (Standard Form 424), a proposed
work plan, a proposed budget, and other required forms. An EPA Project Officer will work
with you to finalize the budget and work plan. It is EPA's expectation that the selected
applicants will complete the award process within six months of the announcement.
2. Approved cooperative agreements will include terms and conditions that will be binding on
the grant recipient. Terms and conditions specify what grantees must do to ensure that grant -
related and Brownfields Program -related requirements are met. Applicants also will be
required to submit progress reports in accordance with grant regulations found in 2 CFR
200.328.
VI.C. Reporting Requirements
During the life of the cooperative agreement, recipients are required to submit progress reports to
the EPA Project Officer within 30 days after each reporting period. The reporting period (i.e.,
quarterly, annually) is identified in the terms and conditions of the cooperative agreement. These
reports cover work status, work progress, difficulties encountered, an accounting of financial
expenditures, preliminary data results, anticipated activities, and any changes of key personnel
involved with the project. Site-specific accomplishments are reported on Property Profile Forms
and can be submitted electronically to EPA's ACRES reporting system. Information provided in
the quarterly reports and submitted in ACRES helps EPA monitor the community's progress
with implementing their project and also directly supports the continuation of the Brownfields
Program by highlighting measurable site-specific accomplishments to the public and Congress.
At the end of the cooperative agreement, a final project report also is required. The final report
will summarize accomplishments, expenditures, outcomes, outputs, lessons learned, and any
other resources leveraged during the project and how they were used.
VI.D. Brownfields Programmatic Requirements
16G.3.e
LO
LO
Nt
N
N
r
d
0
co
J
C0
O
2
LU
J
O
Q
LU
O
U_
O
Z
w
c
a�
E
U
Q
Brownfields grantees must comply with all applicable federal and state laws to ensure that the
assessment and cleanup protects human health and the environment. Brownfields grantees also
52
Packet Pg. 2299
^` must comply with the program's technical requirements, which may include, but are not limited
to, the following requirements below.
Quality Assurance (QA) Requirements
When environmental samples are collected as part of any brownfields cooperative agreement
(e.g., assessment and site characterization, cleanup verification sampling, post -cleanup
confirmation sampling), recipients shall submit to EPA for approval a Quality Assurance
Protect Plan (QAPP) prior to the collection of environmental samples. The QAPP must
document quality assurance practices sufficient to produce data adequate to meet project
objectives and minimize data loss. Compliance with the Quality Assurance requirements is
an eligible use of grant funds for Assessment Grants.
2. Historic Properties or Threatened and Endangered Species
If historic properties or threatened or endangered (T&E) species may be impacted by the
assessment or cleanup of a site, the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA) or the Endangered Species Act (ESA) may apply, respectively. Grantees are
required to consult with EPA prior to conducting any on-site activity (such as invasive
sampling or cleanup) that may affect historic properties or T&E species to ensure that the
requirements of Section 106 of NHPA and Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA are met. Assessment
grantees should plan for these consultation requirements.
3. All Appropriate Inquiries
All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) must comply with 40 CFR Part 312 and must, at a
minimum, include the information below. All AAI reports submitted to EPA Project Officers
as deliverables under this assessment cooperative agreement must be accompanied by a
completed "Reporting Requirements Checklist" that EPA's Project Officer will provide to
the recipient. The checklist also is available to grantees on the EPA website at
www.epa.Qov/brownfields/brownfields-all-qppropriate-inquilies. They must include the
information below.
a. An opinion as to whether the inquiry has identified conditions indicative of releases or
threatened releases of hazardous substances, and as applicable, pollutants and
contaminants, petroleum or petroleum products, or controlled substances, on, at, in, or to
the subject property.
b. An identification of "significant" data. gaps (as defined in 40 CFR 312.10), if any, in the
information collected for the inquiry. Significant data gaps include missing or
unattainable information that affects the ability of the environmental professional to
identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances,
and as applicable, pollutants and contaminants, petroleum or petroleum products, or
controlled substances, on, at, in, or to the subject property. The documentation of
significant data gaps must include information regarding the significance of these data
gaps.
c. Qualifications and signature of the environmental professional(s). The environmental
professional must place the statements below in the document and sign the document.
53
Packet Pg. 2300
1:6.G.3.e
` `(I, We) declare that, to the best of (my, our) professional knowledge and belief, (I, we)
meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of this part. "
•
'V, We) have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience
to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. (I, We)
have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the
standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. "
Note: Please use either "I" or "We."
d. In compliance with §312.31(b), the environmental professional must include in the final
report an opinion regarding additional appropriate investigation, if the environmental
professional has such an opinion.
EPA may review checklists and AAI final reports for compliance with the AAI regulation
documentation requirements at 40 CFR Part 312 (or comparable requirements for those using
ASTM Standard 1527-13). Any deficiencies identified during an EPA review of these
documents must be corrected by the recipient within 30 days of notification. Failure to
correct any identified deficiencies may result in EPA disallowing the costs for the entire AAI
report as authorized by 2 CFR 200.338 (b). If a recipient willfully fails to correct the
deficiencies, the Agency may consider other available remedies under 2 CFR 200.338 — 2
CFR 200.342 and 2 CFR Part 180.
4. Sufficient Progress
EPA will evaluate whether the recipient has made sufficient progress 18 months from the
date of award. For purposes of Assessment Grants, the recipient demonstrates "sufficient N
progress" when 35% of funds have been drawn down and obligated to eligible activities; for d
Assessment Coalition Grants "sufficient progress" is demonstrated when a solicitation for o
services has been released, sites are prioritized or an inventory has been initiated if necessary, co
community involvement activities have been initiated and a Memorandum of Agreement is in
place. If EPA determines that the recipient has not made sufficient progress, the recipient
must implement a corrective action plan approved by EPA. Failure to comply with the O
reporting requirements may result in an early termination of the grant and return of grant 0
funds to EPA. w
0
5. Collection of Post -Grant InformationLU
Q
Under the Government Performance and Results Act, EPA reports on the many benefits of 0
0
brownfields funding. One such measure provides information on additional resources o
leveraged as a result of using brownfields grant funds. These leveraged, non -EPA funds may z
include additional cleanup funds or redevelopment funding from other federal agencies, state,
tribal, and local governments, or private organizations. As many of these activities occur
beyond the grant period, please note that EPA may contact you well after the grant period of
performance to collect this information. Q
6. Protection of Nearby and Sensitive Populations
Grantees are required to protect all nearby populations, including sensitive populations in the
target community from contaminants during assessment work conducted on brownfield sites
54
Packet Pg. 2301
^ under this grant. Activities include implementing procedures necessary to mitigate any
potential exposure from the contamination.
VI.E. Use of Funds
An applicant that receives an award under this announcement is expected to manage assistance
agreement funds efficiently and effectively and make sufficient progress towards completing the
project activities described in the workplan in a timely manner. The assistance agreement will
include terms and conditions implementing this requirement.
VI.F. Disputes
Assistance agreement competition -related disputes will be resolved in accordance with the
dispute resolution procedures published in 70 FR (Federal Register) 3629, 3630 (January 26,
2005) which can be found in the EPA Solicitation Clauses at www.epa.Qov/grants/epa-
solicitation-clauses#Disputes. Copies of these procedures may also be requested by contacting
the person listed in Section VII. of the announcement.
VI.G. Additional Provisions for Applicants Incorporated Into the Solicitation
Additional provisions that apply to this solicitation and/or awards made under this solicitation,
including but not limited to those related to DUNS, SAM, copyrights, disputes, and
administrative capability, can be found in the EPA Solicitation Clauses at
http://,a ww.epa.gov/grants/epa-solicitation-clauses. These, and the other provisions that can be
found at the website link, are important, and applicants must review them when preparing
proposals for this solicitation. If you are unable to access these provisions electronically at the
website above, please communicate with the EPA contact listed in this solicitation to obtain the
provisions.
55
16.G.3.e
Packet Pg. 2302
SECTION VII. — AGENCY CONTACTS — Regional Brownfields Contacts
REGIONAL CONTACTS & STATES
ADDRESS
EPA Region 1
5 Post Office Square
Frank Gardner
CT, ME, MA,
Suite 100, Mail code: OSRR7-2
gardnenfrank(Z�epa.gov
NH, RI, VT
Boston, MA 02109-3912
Phone (617) 918-1278
EPA Region 2
290 Broadway; 18th Floor
Lya Theodoratos
NJ, NY, PR, VI
New York, NY 10007
theodoratos.lya(a)epa. gov
Phone (212) 637-3260
EPA Region 3
1650 Arch Street
Tom Stolle
DE, DC, MD,
Mail Code 3HS51
stolle.toin06epa.gov
PA, VA, WV
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone (215) 814-3129
EPA Region 4
Atlanta Federal Center
Barbara Alfano
AL, FL, GA,
KY, MS, NC,
61 Forsyth Street S.W. 10th FL
� '
alfano.barbara(a�epa.aov
SC, TN
Atlanta, GA 30303-8960
Phone (404) 562-8923
EPA Region 5
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Matthew Didier
IL, IN, MI, MN,
Mail Code SE -7J
didier.matthew &,,epa. oo
OH, WI
Chicago, IL 60604-3507
Phone (312) 353-2112
EPA Region 6
1445 Ross Avenue
Paul Johnson
AR, LA, NM,
Suite 1200 (6SF-VB)
johnson.paul(a 0a.gov
OK, TX
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
Phone (214) 665-2246
EPA Region 7
11201 Renner Blvd
Susan Klein
IA, KS, MO, NE
Lenexa, KS 66219
klein.susanL&epa.gov
Phone (913) 551-7786
EPA Region 8
Christina Nilson
CO, MT, ND,
1595 Wynkoop Street (EPR -B)
"Til son. christinaO),epa.Lov
SD, UT, WY
Denver, CO 80202-1129
Phone (303) 312-6706
EPA Region 9
AZ, CA, HI, NV,
75 Hawthorne Street, SFD6-1
Noemi Emeric-Ford
Pacific Island
San Francisco, CA 94105
emeric-ford.noemi a epa.gov
Territories
Phone (213) 244-1821
EPA Region 10
1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900
Susan Morales
AK, ID, OR, WA
Mailstop: ECL -112
moral es. susan(a)epa.Qov
Seattle, WA 98101 Fax (206) 553-0124
Phone (206) 553-7299
W
16.G,3.e
T �r�
0
N
N
r
0
00
J
m
O
w
J
O
Q
a
w
O
U_
O
z
c
as
Packet Pg. 2303
16.G.3.e
Appendix 1
Information on Sites Eligible for
Brownfields Funding Under CERCLA §104(k)
1.1. Introduction
The information provided in this Appendix will be used by EPA in determining the eligibility of
any property for brownfields grant funding. The Agency is providing this information to assist
you in developing your proposal for funding under CERCLA § 104(k) and to apprise you of
information that EPA will use in determining the eligibility of any property for brownfields grant
funding.
This information is used by EPA solely to make applicant and site eligibility determinations
for Brownfields grants and is not legally binding for other purposes including federal,
state, or tribal enforcement actions.
1.2. General Definition of Brownfield Site
The Brownfields Law defines a `Brownfield Site" as:
"...real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated
by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or
contaminant."
Brownfield sites include all "real property," including residential, as well as
commercial and industrial properties.
1.3. Additional Areas Specifically Eligible for Funding
The Brownfields Law also identifies three additional types of properties that are specifically
eligible for funding:
1. Sites contaminated by controlled substances.
2. Sites contaminated by petroleum or a petroleum product.
3. Mine -scarred lands.
See below for guidance on determining the scope of each of these three types of sites. Applicants
should identify properties included within their funding proposals that fall within the scope of
any of the following three areas.
1.3.1. Contamination by Controlled Substance
Sites eligible for funding include real property, including residential property, that is
contaminated by a controlled substance. A "controlled substance" is defined under the
Controlled Substances Act as "a drug or other substance, or immediate precursor, included in
Schedule I, II, III, IV, or V of Part B of this title (21 USC Section 812). The term does not
include distilled spirits, wine, malt beverages, or tobacco...'' For example, sites eligible for
brownfields funding may include private residences formerly used for the manufacture and/or
57
Packet Pg. 2304
distribution of methamphetamines or other illegal drugs where there is a presence or potential
presence of controlled substances or pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous substances (e.g., red
phosphorous, kerosene, acids).
1.3.2. Contamination by Petroleum or Petroleum Product
Petroleum -contaminated sites must meet certain requirements to be eligible for brownfields
funding. Petroleum is defined under CERCLA as "crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not
otherwise specifically listed or designated as a hazardous substance under that section."
For a petroleum -contaminated site(s) that otherwise meets the definition of a brownfield site to
be eligible for funding, EPA or the state must determine:
1. The site is "relatively low risk" compared with other "petroleum -only" sites in the state;
and
2. There is no viable responsible party.
3. The site will not be assessed, investigated, or cleaned up by a person that is potentially
liable for cleaning up the site.
4. The site must not be subject to a corrective action order under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) §9003(h).
Site-specific assessment or cleanup grant proposals for petroleum -contaminated sites must
provide information in their proposal indicating whether the site meets each of the criteria listed
above. If EPA awards an applicant a revolving loan fund grant, the state or EPA must make the
same determinations for site(s) that will be cleaned up under a loan or subgrant. These criteria
are explained below.
Please note that states may, but are not required to, use this guidance to determine whether
sites contaminated by petroleum or petroleum products are eligible for brownfields grant
15
funding. States may apply their own laws and regulations, if applicable, to eligibility
determinations under this section.
Note: A petroleum eligibility determination by EPA or a state under CERCLA section
101(39)(D) for the purpose of brownfields funding does not release any party from
obligations under any federal or state law or regulation, or under common law, and does
not impact or limit EPA or state enforcement authorities against any party.
"Relatively Low Risk"
Applicants whose brownfield site(s) include properties or portions of properties contaminated
with petroleum or petroleum products must provide information in their proposal indicating that
the property represents a relatively low risk (compared to other petroleum -only sites). EPA's
view is that the following types of petroleum -contaminated sites are high-risk sites, or are not of
"relatively low risk:"
1. "High risk" sites currently being cleaned up using LUST Trust Fund monies.
2. Any petroleum -contaminated site that currently is subject to a response under the Oil
Pollution Act (OPA).
W.
16:G.3.e
c
0
0
N
W
W
06
M
O
c
0
0
U
C
3.
0
m
L0
v
N
to
c
N
N
T_
W
0
0
J
00
O
LU
J
O
B
CL
UJ
O
U_
O
Z
JJ
c
a�
U
R
w
El
Packet Pg. 2305
16,G,3.e
^ Note: Any site that does not fall under any of the provisions listed above would be
considered to be of relatively low risk for purposes of determining eligibility for a
brownfields grant.
"A Site for Which There is No Viable Responsible Party"
EPA or the state is required to determine that there is no viable responsible party that can address
the petroleum contamination at the site. If EPA, or the state, identifies a party that is responsible
for the activities contemplated by the grant proposal, and that party is financially viable, then the
site is not eligible for funding and EPA cannot award the grant. This analysis is twofold — EPA
or the state must first determine whether a responsible party exists and, if a responsible party is
identified, then determine whether that party is viable for the activities identified in the grant
proposal. Applicants are responsible for providing information in their proposal that
demonstrates that the activities for which they seek funding have no viable responsible party.
A petroleum -contaminated site may be determined to have no responsible party if the site was
last acquired (regardless of whether the site is owned by the applicant) through tax foreclosure,
abandonment, or equivalent government proceedings, and that the site meets the criteria in (1)
below. Any petroleum -contaminated site not acquired by a method listed above will be
determined to have a responsible party if the site fails to meet the criteria in both (1) and (2)
below.
1. No responsible party has been identified for the site through:
a. an unresolved judgment rendered in a court of law or an administrative order that would
require any party (including the applicant) to conduct the activities (including assessment,
investigation or cleanup) contemplated by the grant proposal;
b. an unresolved enforcement action by federal or state authorities that would require any
party (including the applicant) to conduct the activities (including assessment,
investigation, or cleanup) contemplated by the grant proposal; or
c. an unresolved citizen suit, contribution action, or other third party claim brought against
the current or immediate past owner for the site that would, if successful, require the
activities (including assessment, investigation, or cleanup) contemplated by the grant
proposal to be conducted.
2. The current and immediate past owner did not dispense or dispose of, or own the subject
property during the dispensing or disposal of, any contamination at the site, did not
exacerbate the contamination at the site, and took reasonable steps with regard to the
contamination at the site.l
w
If no responsible party is identified above, then the petroleum -contaminated site may be
eligible for funding. If a responsible party is identified above, EPA or the state must next
U
R
t For purposes of determining petroleum brownfieldgrant eligibility, "reasonable steps with regard to
contamination at the site" includes, as appropriate: stopping continuing releases, preventing threatened
future releases, and preventing or limiting human, environmental, or natural resource exposure to earlier
petroleum or petroleum product releases. Reasonable steps are discussed in more detail on pages 9-12 of
EPA's March 6, 2003, "Common Elements" guidance.
59
Packet Pg 2306
16.G.3.e
determine whether that party is viable. If any such party is determined to be viable, then the
petroleum -contaminated site is not eligible for funding.
If there is a responsible party for the site, the applicant should explain in its application what
steps it took to determine a responsible party's financial status, and why the information
presented indicates that the responsible party is not viable. A state making the "viable
responsible party" determination for the applicant may use the standards contained in this
Appendix or its own standard. If a state is not making the determination or a tribe is the
applicant, EPA will follow the standard set forth in this Appendix. Note that any viability
determination made by EPA is for purposes of the CERCLA Section 104(k) grant program
only.
EPA will consider a party to be viable if the party is financially capable of conducting the
activity (i.e., assessment, investigation, or cleanup) identified in the grant proposal.
Generally, EPA will consider ongoing businesses or companies (corporations, LLCs,
partnerships, etc.) and government entities to be viable. EPA will generally deem a defunct
or insolvent company and an individual responsible party to be not viable. EPA will apply
c
these assumptions to its petroleum grant viability determinations, unless there is information
o
suggesting that the assumption is not appropriate in a particular case (e.g., if there is
m
information that an individual has adequate financial resources to address contamination at a
LO
site, or if there is information indicating an ongoing business is not, in fact, viable). An
N
applicant should indicate if one of the above assumptions applies and provide support for the
assertion. In circumstances not covered by one of the above assumptions, the applicant
should explain why the responsible party is not viable.
N
An applicant seeking to determine the financial status (i.e., the viability) of a responsible
a�
o
party should consider consulting the following resources and any other resources it may
CO
deem to be useful to make this determination:
1. Responsible Party: Ask the responsible party for its financial information (tax returns,
a!
m
O
bank statements, financial statements, insurance policies designed to address
environmental liabilities, etc.), especially if the responsible party is still associated with
the site or is the applicant, and, therefore, will receive the benefit of the grant. An
O
applicant that is a responsible party and claiming it is not viable should provide
conclusive information, such as an INDIPAY or MUNIPAY analysis, on its inability to
LU
O
pay for the assessment or cleanup.
p
Z
2. Federal, State, and Local Records: Federal, state, and local (i.e., county and city)
records often provide information on the status of a business. An applicant that is a state
E
or local government should at the very least search its own records for information on a
cc
responsible party. Examples of such resources include regulatory records (e.g., state
Q
hazardous waste records), Secretary of State databases, and property/land records.
Public and Commercial Financial Databases: Applicants also may obtain financial
data from publicly available and commercial sources. Listed below are examples of
60
Packet Pg 2307
16G.3.e
^- sources for financial data that applicants may consider. Please note that some commercial
sources may charge fees. EPA does not endorse the use of any specific sources, and EPA
will accept reliable data from other sources as part of a proposal for funding.
Examples of sources: Lexis/Nexus, Dun & Bradstreet reports, Hoover's Business
Information, Edgar Database of Corporate Information, Thomas Register of American
Manufacturers, The Public Register, Corporate Annual Reports, Internet search engines
(e.g. Google, Ask).
"Cleaned Up by a Person Not Potentially Liable"
Brownfields funding may be awarded for the assessment and cleanup of petroleum -contaminated
sites provided they meet the requests below.
1. The applicant has not dispensed or disposed of or owned the property during the
dispensing or disposal of petroleum or petroleum product at the site, and
2. The applicant did not exacerbate the contamination at the site and took reasonable steps
with regard to the contamination at the site.
"Is not subject to any order issued under 0003(h) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA)"
Proposals that include requests for an assessment or direct cleanup grant to address petroleum -
contaminated sites must not be subject to a corrective action order under RCRA §9003(h). If
EPA awards an applicant a revolving loan fund grant, the state or EPA must make the same
determination for site(s) that will be cleaned up under a loan or subgrant.
1.3.3. Mine -Scarred Lands
Mine -scarred lands are eligible for brownfields funding. EPA's view is that "mine -scarred lands"
are those lands, associated waters, and surrounding watersheds where extraction, beneficiation,
or processing of ores and minerals (including coal) has occurred. For the purposes of this section,
the definition of extraction, beneficiation, and processing is the definition found at 40 CFR
261.4(b)(7).
Mine -scarred lands include abandoned coal mines and lands scarred by strip mining.
Examples of coal mine -scarred lands may include, but are not limited to:
• abandoned surface coal mine areas;
• abandoned deep coal mines;
• abandoned coal processing areas;
• abandoned coal refuse areas;
• acid or alkaline mine drainage; and
• associated waters affected by abandoned coal mine (or acid mine) drainage or runoff,
including stream beds and adjacent watersheds.
Examples of non -coal hard rock mine -scarred lands may include but are not limited to:
• abandoned surface and deep mines;
• abandoned waste rock or spent ore piles;
61
Packet Pg. 2308
• abandoned roads constructed wholly or partially of waste rock or spent ore;
• abandoned tailings, disposal ponds, or piles;
• abandoned ore concentration mills;
• abandoned smelters;
• abandoned cyanide heap leach piles;
• abandoned dams constructed wholly or partially of waste rock, tailings, or spent ore;
• abandoned dumps or dump areas used for the disposal of waste rock or spent ore;
• acid or alkaline rock drainage; and
• waters affected by abandoned metal mine drainage or runoff, including stream beds and
adjacent watersheds.
1.4. Sites Not Eligible for Brownfields Funding
The following three types of properties are not eligible for brownfields funding under the
Brownfields Law, even on a property -specific basis. Applicants should not include these types of
sites in the funding proposals.
1) Facilities listed or proposed for listing on the National Priorities List (NPL).
2) Facilities subject to unilateral administrative orders, court orders, administrative orders on
consent, or judicial consent decrees issued to or entered into by parties under CERCLA.
3) Facilities that are subject to the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the U.S. government.
Facilities owned by, or under the custody or control of, the federal government are not
eligible for brownfields funding. EPA's view is that this exclusion may not extend to:
a. privately -owned, Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS);
b. privately -owned, Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)
properties; and
c. other former federal properties that have been disposed of by the U.S. government.
Note that land held in trust by the U.S. government for an Indian tribe is not excluded from
funding eligibility. In addition, eligibility for brownfields funding does not alter a private
oNAmer's ability to cost recover from the federal government in cases where the previous federal
government owner remains liable for environmental damages.
1.5. Particular Classes of Sites Eligible for Brownfields Funding Only With Property -
Specific Determinations
The following special classes of property are generally ineligible brownfield sites unless EPA
makes a "Property -Specific Determination" and detennines they are eligible for funding. These
include:
properties subject to planned or ongoing removal actions under CERCLA;
properties with facilities that have been issued or entered into a unilateral administrative
order, a court order, an administrative order on consent, or judicial consent decree or to
which a permit has been issued by the United States or an authorized state under RCRA,
FWPCA, TSCA, or SDWA;
62
16G.3.e
to
T �\
C
h
N
0
CO
r
J
m
0
w
J
0
Q
a
LU
0
L_
0
Z
c
aD
E
U
El
Packet Pg. 2309
16.G.3.e
• properties with facilities subject to RCRA corrective action (§3004(u) or §3008(h)) to which
a corrective action permit or order has been issued or modified to require the implementation
of corrective measures;
• properties that are land disposal units that have submitted a RCRA closure notification or that
are subject to closure requirements specified in a closure plan or permit;
• properties where there has been a release of PCBs and all or part of the property is subject to
TSCA remediation; and
• properties that include facilities receiving monies for cleanup from the LUST Trust Fund.
EPA's approval of Property -Specific Determinations will be based on whether or not awarding a
grant will protect human health and the environment and either promote economic development
or enable the property to be used for parks, greenways, and similar recreational or nonprofit
purposes. Property -Specific Determination requests should be attached to your proposal and do
not count toward the 15 -page limit. See the Brownfields FAQs at
www.gpa.,gov/sites/`p-roduction/files/2016-08/documents/fyl7 fag s.pdf for more information on
how to prepare and submit a Property -Specific Determination.
1.5.1. Facilities Subject to CERCLA Removal Actions
Properties (including parcels of properties) where there are removal actions may not receive
funding, unless EPA makes a property -specific determination of funding eligibility.
EPA's view is that a removal may be identified by the occurrence of one of the following events,
whichever occurs first in time: EPA issues an action memo; EPA issues an Engineering
Evaluation/Cost Analysis approval memo; EPA mobilizes onsite; EPA issues a notice of federal
interest to one or more potentially responsible parties (PRPs), which in emergencies may be
made verbally; or EPA takes other actions that are consistent with a removal.
Once a removal action is complete, a property is eligible for brownfields funding without having
to obtain a property -specific funding determination. EPA's view is that, solely for the purposes
of eligibility to receive brownfields funding, a removal is complete when the actions specified in
the action memorandum are met, or when the contractor has demobilized and left the site (as
documented in the "pollution report" or POLREP). Applicants applying for brownfields funding
for sites at which removal actions are complete must include documentation of the action being
complete with their funding proposal.
Parcels of facilities not affected by removal action at the same property may apply for
brownfields funding and may be eligible for brownfields funding on a property -specific basis.
Property -specific funding decisions will be made in coordination with the on -scene coordinator
(OSC) to ensure that all removals and cleanup activities at the property are conducted in safe and
protective manners and to ensure that the OSC retains the ability to address all risks and
contamination.
Please note that if a federal brownfields-funded site assessment results in identifying the need for a
new removal action, the grantee may continue to expend Assessment Grant funds on additional
63
Packet Pg. 2310
assessment activities. However, any additional expenditure of federal brownfields funds and any
additional site assessment activities should be conducted in coordination with the OSC for the site.
1.5.2. Facilities to which a permit has been issued by the United States or an authorized
state under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, or the Safe Drinking Water Act
Generally, in cases where a property or a portion of a property is permitted under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act, Section § 1321 of the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water
Act, and/or the Toxic Substances and Control Act, the property, or portion of the property, may
not receive funding without a property -specific determination. Therefore, applicants should
review the following guidance regarding which types of permitted facilities may not receive
funding unless EPA makes a property -specific determination to provide funding. Applicants
should note that the exclusion for permitted facilities does not extend to facilities with National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits issued under the authorities of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, but is limited to facilities issued permits under the
authorities of the Oil Pollution Act (i.e., § 1321 of FWPCA).
In cases where one or more portions of a property are not eligible for funding, the applicant
should identify the specific permit and situation that causes the property to be excluded. In
addition, the applicant must include, within the proposal, documentation that federal brownfields
funding for the assessment or cleanup of the property will further the goals established for
property -specific funding determinations as described in the Brownfields FAQs at
www.el)a.gov/sites/production/files/2016-08/documents/fyl7 fags.pdf.
In some cases, a facility may not have a permit or order because it is not in compliance with
federal or state environmental laws requiring that it obtain a permit or the facility has failed to
notify EPA of its regulatory status. Such facilities are not eligible for brownfields funding. For
example, a RCRA treatment unit operator is required to obtain a permit and/or notify EPA of its
operation. An operator that fails to fulfill those obligations will likely not have a permit or order
as EPA will be unaware of its existence. Therefore, it is EPA's view that such facilities are
ineligible to receive brownfields funds as a result of their failure to comply with a basic
regulatory requirement. Additional guidance on the eligibility of RCRA-permitted facilities,
including facilities under administrative or court orders, including corrective action orders, is
provided in the Brownfields FAQs at www.epa.�4ov/sites/production/files/2016-
08/documents/fy,17 fags.pdf.
1.5.3. RCRA Sites
RCRA Facilities that are Eligible for Funding
EPA's view is that the following types of RCRA facilities are eligible for brownfields funding
and do not require Property -Specific Determinations:
a. RCRA interim status facilities that are not subject to any administrative or judicial order or
consent decree;
16.G.3.e
0
0
a�
06
M
O
c
0
0
U
m
c
0
m
LO
LO
Nt
N
0
N
N
CD
0
n
co
T
J
m
O
UJ
J
O
a
LU
O
I
O
Z
E
Q
b. RCRA interim status facilities that are subject to administrative or judicial orders that do not
include corrective action requirements or any other cleanup provisions (e.g., RCRA §3008(a)
orders without provisions requiring the owner/operator to address contamination); and
64
Packet Pg. 2311
16G.3.e
c. parcels of RCRA facilities that are not under the scope of a RCRA permit or administrative
or judicial order.
RCRA Facilities that Require Property -Specific Determinations
EPA's view is that the following types of RCRA facilities may not receive funding without a
property -specific determination:
a. RCRA-permitted facilities;
b. RCRA interim status facilities with administrative orders requiring the facility to conduct
corrective action or otherwise address contamination, including facilities with orders issued
under the authorities of RCRA §3008(a), §3008(h), §3013, and §7003;
c. facilities under court order or under an administrative order on consent or judicial consent
decree under RCRA or CERCLA that require the facility to conduct corrective action or
otherwise address contamination at the facility; and
d. land disposal units that have notified EPA or an authorized state of their intent to close and
have closure requirements specified in closure plans or permits.
1.5.4. Land disposal units that have filed a closure notification under Subtitle C of RCRA
and to which closure requirements have been specified in a closure plan or permit
RCRA hazardous waste landfills that have submitted closure notifications, as required under 40
CFR 264.112(d) or 265.112(d), generally will not be funded. This may include permitted
facilities that have filed notification of closure and for which EPA and/or an authorized state is
proceeding with final closure requirements for the facility. For interim status facilities, this is
done through approval of a closure plan submitted with closure notification. For permitted
facilities, this is routinely done as a modification to the permit, requested by the facility at the
time of closure notification.
Please note that RCRA hazardous waste landfills that have submitted closure notifications may
be eligible for brownfields funding with a Property -Specific Determination.
1.5.5. Sites Contaminated with PCBs
The Brownfields Law excludes from funding eligibility portions of facilities where there has
been a release of PCBs that are subject to remediation under TSCA.
EPA's view is that all portions of properties are eligible for brownfields site assessment grants,
except where EPA has initiated an involuntary action with any person to address PCB
contamination. Also, it is EPA's view that all portions of properties are eligible for cleanup and
RLF grants, except where EPA has an ongoing action against a disposer to address PCB
contamination. However, any portion of a property where EPA has initiated an involuntary
action with any person to address PCB contamination and portions of properties where EPA has
an ongoing action against a disposer to address PCB contamination will require a Property -
Specific Determination to be eligible for brownfields funding, including:
• there is a release (or disposal) of any waste meeting the definition of "PCB remediation
waste" at 40 CFR 761.3; and
65
Packet Pg. 2312
16.G.3.e
at which EPA has initiated an involuntary action with any person to address the PCB
contamination. Such involuntary actions could include:
- enforcement action for illegal disposal;
- Regional Administrator's order to characterize or remediate a spill or old disposal (40
CFR 761.50(b)(3));
- penalty for violation of TSCA remediation requirements;
- superfund removal action; or c
- remediation required under RCRA §3004(u) or §3004(v). S
PCBs may be remediated under any one of the following provisions under TSCA:
a. section 761.50(b)(3), the directed characterization, remediation, or disposal action;
b. section 761.61(a), the self -implementing provision;
c. an approval issued under §761.61(c), the risk-based provision;
d. section 761.61(b) to the level of PCB quantification (i.e., 1 ppm in soil);
e. an approval issued under §761.77, the coordinated approval provision;
f. section 761.79, the decontamination provision;
g. an existing EPA PCB Spill Cleanup Policy; or
h. any future policy or guidance addressing PCB spill cleanup or remediation specifically
addressing the remediation of PCBs at brownfield sites.
1.5.6. LUST Trust Fund Sites
The Brownfields Law requires a Property -Specific Determination for funding at those sites (or
portions of properties) for which assistance for response activity has been obtained under o
Subtitle I of RCRA from the LUST Trust Fund. EPA's view is that this provision may exclude N
UST sites where money is being spent on actual assessment and/or cleanup of UST/petroleum
contamination.
0
CO
However, in cases where the state agency has used LUST Trust Fund money for state program
oversight activities on an UST site, but has not expended LUST Trust Funds for specific W
assessment and/or cleanup activities at the site, the site would be eligible for brownfields funding CO
o
and does not need a Property -Specific Determination. Such sites may receive brownfields 0
funding on a property -specific basis, if it is determined that brownfields funding will protect J
human health and the environment and the funding will promote economic development or O
enable the creation of, preservation of, or addition to greenspace (see guidance on documenting w
eligibility for property -specific funding determinations provided in the Brownfields FAQs at o
www.epa.Lyov/sites/production/files/2016-08/documents/fy] 7 faqL.pffi. o
Z
Examples of sites receivinIn
g LUST Trust Fund monies that EPA would consider to be good
candidates to receive Brownfields Grants or loans include: E
a. all UST fields pilots (50 pilots); Q
b. sites (or portions of properties) where an assessment was completed using LUST Trust Fund
monies and the state has determined that the site is a low -priority UST site, and therefore,
additional LUST Trust Fund money cannot be provided for the cleanup of petroleum
contamination, but the site still needs some cleanup and otherwise is a good candidate for
economic revitalization; and
Packet Pg. 2313 --
16.G.3.e
c. sites (or portions of properties) where LUST Trust Fund money was spent for emergency
activities, but then the site was determined to be ineligible for further expenditures of LUST
Trust Funds, yet the site needs additional funding for continued assessment and/or cleanup
that will contribute to economic revitalization of the site.
1.6. Eligible Response Sites/Enforcement Issues
The Brownfields Law limits EPA's enforcement and cost recovery authorities at "eligible
response sites" where a response action is conducted in compliance with a state response
program. Section 101(40) of CERCLA defines an "eligible response site" by referencing the
general definition of a "brownfield site" in §101(39)(A) and incorporating the exclusions at
§ 101(39)(B). The law places further limitations on the types of properties included within the
definition of an eligible response site, but grants EPA the authority to include within the
definition of eligible response site, and on a property -specific basis, some properties that are
otherwise excluded from the definition. Such property -specific determinations must be based
upon a finding that limits an enforcement will be appropriate, after consultation with state
authorities, and will protect human health and the environment and promote economic
development or facilitate the creation of, preservation, or addition to a park, a greenway,
undeveloped property, recreational property, or other property used for nonprofit purposes.
While the criteria appear similar to those for determining eligibility for funding on a property -
specific basis, the determinations are distinct, will be made through a separate process, and may
not be based on the same information requested in this document for property -specific funding
determinations.
Also, please note that in providing funding for brownfield sites, and given that a limited amount
of funding is available for Brownfields Grants, EPA's goal is to not provide brownfields funding
to sites where EPA has a planned or ongoing enforcement action. While EPA does not intend
that the existence of a planned or ongoing enforcement action will necessarily disqualify a site
from receipt of brownfields funding, EPA does believe it is necessary that EPA be aware of the
existence of any such action in making funding decisions. As a result, EPA will conduct an
investigation to evaluate whether a site is, or will be, subject to an enforcement action under
CERCLA or other federal environmental statutes. EPA is requesting that applicants identify
ongoing or anticipated environmental enforcement actions related to the brownfield site for
which funding is sought.
67
Packet Pg. 2314
16.G.3.e
Appendix 2
www.grants.gov Proposal Submission Instructions
A. Requirement to Submit Through www.grants.gov and Limited Exception Procedures
Applicants, except as noted below, must apply electronically through www.grants.gov under this 2
funding opportunity based on the www.grants.gov instructions in this announcement. If an
°
applicant does not have the technical capability to apply electronically through www.grants.gov
c
because of limited or no Internet access which prevents them from being able to upload the
a
required application materials to www.grants.gov, the applicant must contact
e:
OGDWaivers(aepa.gov or the address listed below in writing (e.g., by hard copy, email) at least
M
15 calendar days prior to the submission deadline under this announcement to request approval
g
to submit their application materials through an alternate method.
o
Mailing Address: Courier Address:
o
OGD Waivers OGD Waivers
c/o Barbara Perkins c/o Barbara Perkins
USEPA Headquarters Ronald Reagan Building
w
William Jefferson Clinton Building 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
0L-
1200
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Rm # 51267
m
Mail Code: 3903R Washington, DC 20004
LO
Washington, DC 20460
In the request, the applicant must include the following information:
N
T-
■ Funding Opportunity Number (FON)
CD
■ Organization Name and DUNS
■ Organization's Contact Information (email address and phone number)
00
■ Explanation of how they lack the technical capability to apply electronically through
�
www.grants.gov because of 1) limited Internet access or 2) no Internet access which
m
prevents them from being able to upload the required application materials through
0
www. grants. Dov.
w
O
EPA will only consider alternate submission exception requests based on the two reasons stated
Q
above and will timely respond to the request -- all other requests will be denied. If an alternate
w
O
submission method is approved, the applicant will receive documentation of this approval and
further instructions on how to apply under this announcement. Applicants will be required to
z
submit the documentation of approval with any initial application submitted under the alternative
c
method. In addition, any submittal through an alternative method must comply with all
E
applicable requirements and deadlines in the announcement including the submission deadline
and requirements regarding proposal content and page limits (although the documentation of
approval of an alternate submission method will not count against any page limits).
If an exception is granted, it is valid for submissions to EPA for the remainder of the entire
calendar year in which the exception was approved and can be used to justify alternative
submission methods for application submissions made through December 31St of the calendar
68
Packet Pg. 2315
16.G.3.e
^ year in which the exception was approved (e.g., if the exception was approved on March 1, 2016,
it is valid for any competitive or non-competitive application submission to EPA through
December 31, 2016). Applicants need only request an exception once in a calendar year and all
exceptions will expire on December 31St of that calendar year. Applicants must request a new
exception from required electronic submission through www.izrants.gov for submissions for any
succeeding calendar year. For example, if there is a competitive opportunity issued on December
1, 2016, with a submission deadline of January 15, 2017, the applicant would need a new
exception to submit through alternative methods beginning January 1, 2017.
Please note that the process described in this section is only for requesting alternate submission
methods. All other inquiries about this announcement must be directed to the Regional
Brownfields Contact listed in Section VII. Queries or requests submitted to the email address
identified above for any reason other than to request an alternate submission method will not be
acknowledged or answered.
B. Submission Instructions
The electronic submission of your application must be made by the Authorized Organization
Representative (AOR) of your institution who is registered with www. grants. Rov and is
authorized to sign applications for federal assistance. For more information on the registration
requirements that must be completed in order to submit an application through www.grants.gov,
go to www.grants.gov and click on "Applicants" on the top of the page and then go to the "Get
Registered" link on the page. If your organization is not currently registered with
www.grants.gov, ants.gov, please encourage your office to designate an AOR and ask that individual to
begin the registration process as soon as possible. Please note that the registration process also
requires that your organization have a DUNS number and a current registration with the System
for Award Management (SAM) and the process of obtaining both could take a month or more.
Applicants must ensure that all registration requirements are met in order to apply for this
opportunity through www.grants.gov and should ensure that all such requirements have been met
well in advance of the submission deadline. Registration on www.arants.Rov, www.sam.,i�ov, and
DUNS number assignment is FREE.
Applicants need to ensure that the AOR who submits the application through www.arants. rov
and whose DUNS number is listed on the application is an AOR for the applicant listed on the
application. Additionally, the DUNS number listed on the application must be registered to the
applicant organization's SAM account. If not, the application may be deemed ineligible.
To begin the application process under thisgrant announcement, go to www.Rrants.< y and click
on "Applicants" on the top of the page and then "Apply for Grants" from the dropdown menu
and then follow the instructions accordingly. Please note: apply through www.�,Trants.(ov, you E
must use Adobe Reader software and download the compatible Adobe Reader version. For more Y
information about Adobe Reader, to verify compatibility, or to download the free software,
please visit http•iiwww trants aov/web/6rants/suppoit/technical-soi)ort/software/adobe-reader-
compatibilitv.html.
�. You may also be able to access the application package for this announcement by searching for
69
Packet Pg. 2316
16.G.3.e
the opportunity on www.grants.gov. Go to www.grants.gov and then click on "Search Grants" at
the top of the page and enter the Funding Opportunity Number, EPA-OLEM-OBLR-16-08, or
the CFDA number that applies to the announcement (CFDA 66.818), in the appropriate field and
click the "Search" button. Alternatively, you may be able to access the application package by
clicking on the "Application Package" button at the top right of the synopsis page for the
announcement on www.arants.gov. To find the synopsis page, go to www.grants.gov and click
"Browse Agencies" in the middle of the page and then go to "Environmental Protection Agency"
to find the EPA funding opportunities.
Proposal Submission Deadline: Your organization's AOR must successfully submit your
complete application package electronically to EPA through www. rants.Rov no later than
December 20, 20169 20169 11:59 p.m. ET. Please allow for enough time to successfully submit
your application process and allow for unexpected errors that may require you to resubmit.
Please submit all of the application materials described below using the www.(2rants.gov
application package that you downloaded using the instructions above. For additional
instructions on completing and submitting the electronic application package, click on the "Show
Instructions" tab that is accessible within the application package itself.
Applications submitted through www.Qrants.gov will be time and date stamped electronically. If m
you have not received a confirmation of receipt from EPA (not from www. rg_ ants.gov) within 30 LO
days of the proposal deadline, please contact Jerry Minor -Gordon at minor- N
Bordon jerrv(aepa.gov. Failure to do so may result in your proposal not being reviewed. to
C
Application Materials N
d
The following forms and documents are mandatory under this announcement. o
co
1. Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424)
2. Cover Letter and Narrative Proposal. See Section IV.C. for details on the content of
J
the Cover Letter and Narrative Proposal, and the associated page limits. m
0
3. Required Attachments. See Section IV.C. of this announcement.
LU
J
C. Technical Issues with Submission 0
Q
a
w
1. Once the application package has been completed, the "Submit" button should be enabled. If 0
the "Submit" button is not active, please call www.grants.gov for assistance at 1-800-518- 0
4726. Applicants who are outside the U.S. at the time of submittal and are not able to access
the toll-free number may reach a www.12rants.Qov representative by calling 606-545-5035.
Applicants should save the completed application package with two different file names
before providing it to the AOR to avoid having to re-create the package should submission
problems be experienced or a revised application needs to be submitted. Q
2. Submitting the application. The application package must be transferred to www. grants.Qov
by an AOR. The AOR should close all other software before attempting to submit the
application package. Click the "submit" button of the application package. Your Internet ^
70
Packet Pg. 2317
16G.3.e
^ browser will launch and a sign -in page will appear. Note: Minor problems are not
uncommon with transfers to www.grants.gov. It is essential to allow sufficient time to
ensure that your application is submitted to www.grants.gov BEFORE the due date
identified in Section IV. of this solicitation. The www.grants.gov support desk operates 24
hours a day, seven days a week, except federal holidays.
A successful transfer will end with an on-screen acknowledgment. For documentation
purposes, print or screen capture this acknowledgment. If a submission problem occurs,
reboot the computer — turning the power off may be necessary — and re -attempt the
submission.
Note: www.grants.gov issues a "case number" upon a request for assistance.
3. Transmission difficulties. If transmission difficulties that result in a late transmission, no
transmission, or rejection of the transmitted application are experienced, and following the
above instructions do not resolve the problem so that the application is submitted to
www.grants.gov by the deadline date and time, follow the guidance below. The Agency will
make a decision concerning acceptance of each late submission on a case-by-case basis. All
emails, as described below, are to be sent to Jerry Minor -Gordon (minor-
gordon.jerryn.epa.gov) with the FON in the subject line. If you are unable to email, contact
Jerry Minor -Gordon (202-566-1817). Be aware that EPA will only consider accepting
applications that were unable to transmit due to www.grants.gov or relevant www.sam.Qov
system issues or for unforeseen exigent circumstances, such as extreme weather interfering
with Internet access. Failure of an applicant to submit timely because they did not properly or
timely register in www.sam.gov or www.rants.gov is not an acceptable reason to justify
acceptance of a late submittal.
(a) If you are experiencing problems resulting in an inability to upload the application to
www.6rants.g,ov, it is essential to call www.grants.gov for assistance at 1-800-518-4726
before the application deadline. Applicants who are outside the U.S. at the time of
submittal and are not able to access the toll-free number may reach a www.�_Yrants.�ov
representative by calling 606-545-5035. Be sure to obtain a case number from
www. grants. �,ov. If the problems stem from unforeseen exigent circumstances unrelated
to www.Qrants.�ov, such as extreme weather interfering with Internet access, contact
Jerry Minor -Gordon (202-566-1817).
(b) Unsuccessful transfer of the application package: If a successful transfer of the
application cannot be accomplished even with assistance from www.arants.14ov due to
electronic submission system issues or unforeseen exigent circumstances, send an email
message to minor-aordon.ierry(&gpa.gov prior to the application deadline. The email
message must document the problem --and include the www.uants.gov case number as
well as the entire application in PDF format as an attachment.
(c) www.grants.Rov rejection of the application package: If a notification is received from
www.arants.gov stating that the application has been rejected for reasons other than late
submittal promptly send an email to Jerry Minor -Gordon (minor-6ordonjerryvf&epa.aov)
71
Packet Pg 2318''
with the FON in the subject line within one business day of the closing date of this
solicitation. The email should include any materials provided by www. rg ants.gov and
attach the entire application in PDF format.
72
16.G.3.e
T ,rte\
C
N
N
r
d
0
T-
T-
0 O
UJ
J
0
Q
Q
LL!
LL
0
Z
E
U
f0
El
Packet Pg. 2319
16.G.3.e
Appendix 3 - Regional Priorities Form/Other Factors Checklist
Name of Applicant:
Regional Priorities Other Factor
If your proposed Brownfields Assessment project will advance the regional priority(ies)
identified in Section I.F., please indicate the regional priority(ies) and the page number(s) for
where the information can be found within your 15 -page narrative. Only address the priority(ies)
for the region in which your project is located. EPA will verify these disclosures prior to
selection and may consider this information during the selection process. If this information is
not clearly discussed in your narrative proposal, it will not be considered during the selection
process.
Regional Priority Title(s):
Page Number(s):
Assessment Other Factors Checklist
Please identify (with an X) which, if any, of the below items apply to your community or your
project as described in your proposal. To be considered for an Other Factor, you must include the
page number where each applicable factor is discussed in your proposal. EPA will verify these
disclosures prior to selection and may consider this information during the selection process. If
this information is not clearly discussed in your narrative proposal or in any other attachments, it
will not be considered during the selection process.
Other Factor
Page #
None of the Other Factors are applicable.
Community population is 10,000 or less.
Applicant is, or will assist, a federally recognized Indian tribe or United States
territory.
Target brownfield sites are impacted by mine -scarred land.
Project is primarily focusing on Phase I1 assessments.
Applicant demonstrates firm leveraging commitments for facilitating brownfield
project completion by identifying amounts and contributors of funding in the
proposal and have included documentation.
Recent (2008 or later) significant economic disruption has occurred within
community, resulting in a significant percentage loss of community jobs and tax
base.
Applicant is one of the 24 recipients, or a core partner/implementation strategy
arty, of a "manufacturing community" designation provided by the Economic
73
Packet Pg 2320
Development Administration (EDA) under the Investing in Manufacturing
Communities Partnership (IMCP). To be considered, applicants must clearly
demonstrate in the proposal the nexus between their IMCP designation and
the Brownfield activities. Additionally, applicants must attach
documentation which demonstrate either designation as one of the 24
recipients, or relevant pages from a recipient's IMCP proposal which
lists/describes the core partners and implementation strategy parties.
Applicant is a recipient or a core partner of HUD -DOT -EPA Partnership for
Sustainable Communities (PSC) grant funding or technical assistance that is
directly tied to the proposed Brownfields project, and can demonstrate that
funding from a PSC grant/technical assistance has or will benefit the project
area. Examples of PSC grant or technical assistance include a HUD Regional
Planning or Challenge grant, DOT Transportation Investment Generating
Economic Recovery (TIGER), or EPA Smart Growth Implementation or
Building Blocks Assistance, etc. To be considered, applicant must attach
documentation.
Applicant is a recipient of an EPA Brownfields Area -Wide Planning grant.
74
16.G.3.e
Ln
LO
N
T �\
Q
N
N
r
d
3
0
co
r
J
co
O
W
J
O
Q
CL
W
O
LL
O
z
_
a�
E
U
fC
2-4
Packet Pg. ,2321
W
4-
O
N
O
N
r
N
(6
N
10
a
LU
a
0
w