Agenda 12/13/2016 Item #11C 11 C
12/13/2016
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 15-6447 with Kelly Brothers,Inc.
(and corresponding deductive Change Order No. 4), resulting from a Cost Saving Initiative (CSI)
Proposal from the contractor reducing the contract amount by $545,190.19 for the construction of
the Chokoloskee Bridge,Project No. 66066.9.
OBJECTIVE: To approve an amendment to Agreement No. 15-6447 with Kelly Brothers, Inc., ("Kelly
Brothers"), and deductive Change Order No. 4, as a result of the contractor's Cost Savings Initiative
(CSI) Proposal.
CONSIDERATIONS: The County advertised Solicitation Number 15-6447, the Chokoloskee Bridge
Replacement Project, for bid on September 28, 2015. During the question and answer period of the
solicitation for construction bids, contractors posed questions as to whether alternative foundations would
be considered for the bridge. Being aware of variations in construction means and methods of the diverse
contractors bidding on the project, the County's solicitation provided that it would consider alternative
cost saving proposals in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Standard
Specifications, 2014, Section 4-3.9, Cost Savings Initiative Proposal.
FDOT Specifications Section 4-3.9 allows a contractor to initiate and develop a CSI proposal for the
purpose of increasing cost effectiveness or significantly improving the quality of the end result. By
including this specification in its solicitation, the County expressly allowed for the opportunity to
consider proposals that would result in net savings to the County by providing for an alternative design
that would reduce the contract amount without impairing the essential function and characteristics of the
bridge construction project. Pursuant to FDOT Specification Section 4-3.9.7 (and the terms of the
solicitation), if the County approves a contractor's CSI proposal, the contractor receives 50% of the net
reduction in the cost of performance of the Contract; that is, the County and contractor equally share the
net amount saved as the result of the CSI proposal.
On January 12, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) awarded Contract 15-6447 to Kelly
Brothers for the construction of the Chokoloskee Bridge Replacement Project in the amount of
$8,050,911.82. On March 16, 2016, Kelly Brothers notified County staff of its intent to submit a CSI
proposal related to changes to the structural design of the bridge, and requested that a CSI Workshop be
held prior to commencement of the contract time.
On May 20, 2016, staff held a CSI Workshop to review Kelly Brother's CSI proposal identifying an
opportunity to realize a savings of approximately one million dollars through a redesign and utilization of
alternative construction means,methods and materials. After reviewing this potential opportunity to save
the County hundreds of thousands of dollars, staff advised Kelly Brothers to proceed with preparing a
formal Proposal for submittal and review.
On July 18, 2016, Kelly Brothers submitted its formal CSI proposal for review by the Engineer of Record
(EOR), TY Lin International, the County's Construction and Engineering Inspection (CEI) consultant,
HighSpans Engineering, Inc., and staff. The proposal included design changes representing a savings of
$1,001,710.99 to be split between the County and the Contractor per FDOT Specifications, Section 4-3.9.
Packet Pg. 395
11.0
12/13/2016
On November 23, 2016, after multiple reviews by the EOR, the County's CEI consultant and staff, Kelly
Brothers submitted its final Proposal representing a savings of$1,048,849.66 to be split equally between
the County and Kelly Brothers. Additionally, the County requested that Kelly Brothers share in the
County's consultant expenses for reviewing the Proposal. This resulted in an additional contract savings
of $20,765.36 in the County's favor. Subsequently, staff prepared an amendment to Kelly Brothers'
original agreement with the County and the associated deductive Change Order No. 4 in the amount of
$545,190.19 for the Board's consideration.
The original EOR for the bridge, TY Lin International, reviewed the CSI proposal and offered the
following statement in a letter dated November 22, 2016:
"Based on the information provided, we believe the CSI meets the intent and design
criteria of the original plans and therefore the bridge will meet or exceed the seventy-five
(75)year design life. We recommend the County accept the CSI Proposal."
The complete letter is available in the attached CSI package.
The County's CEI consultant for the project, HighSpans Engineering, Incorporated, also reviewed the
proposal and concurred that: "The proposed CSI Bridge Design and Details will meet or exceed the
original design's life expectancy of 75-years." HighSpans' November 23, 2016, letter in support is
included in the attached CSI package.
Key features of the CSI proposal include, but are not limited to, the use of a more detailed wave loading
analysis, which allows for a construction cost reduction by replacing the 54" cylinder piles in the original
design with groups of 24" square piles. In turn, the decrease in pile size decreases trucking, specialty
equipment and material costs. Mid-span diaphragms were added to the design to allow the use of
concrete shear blocks in place of galvanized bearing assemblies/beam anchors thus reducing anticipated
annual maintenance costs.
The Amendment to the Agreement places all liability and responsibility for the CSI bridge redesign on
Kelly Brothers. Further, Kelly Brothers assumes all financial risk associated with quantity overruns or
under-runs related to the CSI bridge re-design, as well as, all impacts, costs, delays or damages, whether
direct or indirect, resulting from Contractor initiated changes in the original bridge design. Finally, the
contractor has no right to any additional monetary compensation for any direct or indirect costs or profit
for any additional work required to complete the work included in the Cost Savings Initiative.
FISCAL IMPACT: The change to the contract 15-6447 amount is a deduction of $545,190.19. The
source of funding is Gas Taxes Fund 313 Project 66066.9 Chokoloskee Bridge Replacement.
The expected useful service life of the new bridge is estimated to be 75 years. Furthermore, the proposed
modifications in the Proposal are anticipated to reduce the annual maintenance cost of the bridge while
continuing to utilize Florida Department of Transportation standards as applicable.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality, and requires majority vote
for Board approval.-SRT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The CSI package has been reviewed by staff and is in
conformance with the goals and objectives of the Transportation Engineering and Road Maintenance
Packet Pg.396
11.0
12/13/2016
Divisions of the Growth Management Department.
RECOMMENDATION: To approve an Amendment to Agreement No. 15-6447 and the associated
deductive Change Order No. 4 with Kelly Brothers, Inc., in the amount of$545,190.19 resulting from the
contractor's CSI Proposal for the construction of the Chokoloskee Bridge (Project No. 66066.9), and
authorize the Chair to execute the attached Change Order and Contract Amendment.
Prepared by: Andrew Miller, P.E., Senior Project Manager,Transportation Engineering Division and
Anthony 0. Stolts,P.E., Senior Project Manager, Transportation Engineering Division
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. [Linked} Contract Amendment Chokoloskee 120216 srt_w_Appendix B_signed C04 (PDF)
Packet Pg. 397
11.0
12/13/2016
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 11.0
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 15-6447 with
Kelly Brothers, Inc. (and corresponding deductive Change Order No. 4), resulting from a Cost Saving
Initiative (CSI) Proposal from the contractor reducing the contract amount by $545,190.19 for the
construction of the Chokoloskee Bridge, Project No. 66066.9. (David Wilkison, Department Head,
Growth Management Department)
Meeting Date: 12/13/2016
Prepared by:
Title: Project Manager, Senior—Transportation Engineering
Name: Andrew Miller
12/02/2016 2:51 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Division Director-Transportation Eng—Transportation Engineering
Name: Jay Ahmad
12/02/2016 2:51 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Transportation Engineering Jay Ahmad Additional Reviewer Completed 12/02/2016 3:03 PM
Procurement Services Lissett DeLaRosa Level 1 Purchasing Gatekeeper Completed 12/02/2016 3:13 PM
Procurement Services Ted Coyman Additional Reviewer Completed 12/02/2016 3:26 PM
Growth Management Department Diane Lynch Level 1 Division Reviewer Completed 12/02/2016 3:49 PM
Transportation Engineering Gary Putaansuu Additional Reviewer Completed 12/05/2016 7:22 AM
Procurement Services Sandra Herrera Additional Reviewer Completed 12/05/2016 8:11 AM
Procurement Services Allison Kearns Additional Reviewer Completed 12/05/2016 2:33 PM
Growth Management Department Gene Shue Additional Reviewer Completed 12/05/2016 5:19 PM
Procurement Services Evelyn Colon Additional Reviewer Completed 12/06/2016 8:54 AM
Growth Management Department Lisa Taylor Additional Reviewer Completed 12/06/2016 9:01 AM
Growth Management Department David Wilkison Level 2 Division Administrator Completed 12/06/2016 10:23 AM
County Attorneys Office Scott Teach Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 12/06/2016 1:50 PM
County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A.Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 12/06/2016 2:52 PM
Office of Management and Budget Laura Wells Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 12/06/2016 3:37 PM
Budget and Management Office Mark lsackson Additional Reviewer Completed 12/06/2016 3:49 PM
County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 12/07/2016 12:17 PM
Packet Pg.398
- 11.0
12/13/2016
Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 12/13/2016 9:00 AM
r—.
Packet Pg. 399,
APPENDIX B
Exhibit E: Construction
Ghange Order Form
contract #: |T}"-l change #, I 04 I Purchase order #:
.-...Project Manager Name:l I Dlvlslon:
BCC Approved Amount
ContractMork Order Amou nt
Dollar Amount of this Change
Revised ContractMork Order Total
4500166669
Contractor/Firm Name:Kelly Brothers, lnc.Chokoloskee Bridge Replacement
Transportation Engineering
Agenda ltem
Last BCC ApprovalDate;Agenda ltem #
SAP Contract Expiration Date (Master)
Total Change from OriginalAmount
Change from Cunent BCC Approved Amount
from Current Amount
Project Name:
8.050.911.82
8.050.911.82
$ 8,050,911.82
1t12t1611.8
1t12t16 11
Completion Date, Description of the Task(s) Change, and Rationale for the Change
u17nugNottce to pro"""olEzoto I orlginat @ Last ApprovedDate Completlon P31s l-J Date
Revlsed Date
this change)
D Add new task(s) [ Delete task(s] E Change task(s) I Other (see below)
Provlde a responae to the following: 1.) detailed and speclflc explanation/rationale of the rcquested change(s) to the task(s) and I or
the additional days added (lf requested); 2.) why this change was not lncluded ln the orlglnal contract; and, 3.) describe the impact lf
this change ls not processed. Attach additional information from the Design Professional and/or Contrador if needed.
Acceptance of this Change Order shall constitute a modification to contract / work order identified above and will be subject to all the same
terms and conditions as contained in the contract / work order indicated above, as fully as if the same were stated in this acceptance. The
adjustment, if any, to the Contract shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims of the Contractor / Vendor / Consultant /
Design Professional arising
Accepted by:
Approved by:
Services Division
Engineering Division
Management Department
1. This change order is to modify the Contract by approving and incorporating into the contract a Cost Savings lnitiative
(CSl) Proposal in accordance with the Contract which follows the FDOT Standard Specifications, 2014 Section 4-3.9. Key
features of the Contractor's Proposal include, but are not limited to, the use of a more detailed wave loading analysis
which allows for a construction cost reduction by replacing the 54' cylinder piles in the original design with groups of 24"
square piles. ln turn, the decrease in pile size decreases trucking, specialty equipment and material costs. Mid-span
diaphragms were added to the design to allow the use of concrete shear blocks in place of galvanized bearing
assemblies/beam anchors thus reducing anticipated annual maintenance costs. Approval of this CSI Proposal will result
in a total savings of $1,048,849.66 to be split between Collier County and Kelly Brothers, lnc. Additionally, the County
requested that Kelly Brothers share in the County's consultant expenses for reviewing the Proposal. This resulted in an
additional contract savings of $20,765.36 in the County's favor.2. During the question and answer period of the solicitation for construction bids, contractors posed questions as to whether
alternative foundations would be considered for the bridge. Being aware of variations in construction means and methods
of the diverse contractors bidding on the project, the County responded that alternatives would be considered in
accordance with the Contract,3. lf this modification is not processed the County would forego a savings of $545,190.19 and a potential reduction in
maintenance costs as described above.
See Attachment A - Modified Schedule qf VZhes Table and Attachment B - CSI Package dated November 23, 2016.
(Divisions who may require additional signatures may include on separate sheet.)
Accepted
Revised: 1O[ZU2O14
COST SAVINGS
INITIATIVE (CSI) FOR THE
CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT
11/23/2016 Collier County Bid #: 15-6447
The Contractor, Kelly Brothers, Inc., has proposed a cost savings
initiative to replace the 54” cylinder piles in the original design with
24” piles by use of a more detailed wave loading analysis. This
results in materials and equipment cost savings, increased load rating
for the bridge, lower long-term maintenance costs, and a proposed
savings of $1,048,849.66 to be shared between Collier County and
Kelly Brothers, Inc.
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
1
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI)
for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT
C O L L I E R C O U N TY B I D #: 1 5 -6 4 47
Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 3
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM REVIEW ENGINEERS .................................................... 4
3.0 CSI SPECIFICATION ......................................................................................................12
4.0 CONTRACTOR’S PROPOSAL ........................................................................................18
4.1 Description .........................................................................................................................................18
4.2 Detailed Cost Estimate ....................................................................................................................22
4.3 Itemization of Changes, Roles & Responsibilities .......................................................................26
4.4 Target Date for Approval .............................................................................................................32
4.5 Revised Project Schedule ...............................................................................................................34
4.6 Proposed Plans ............................................................................................................................... 38
4.7 Engineering Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 159
4.8 Bridge Hydraulic Report & Wave Loading .............................................................................. 160
4.9 Geotechnical Report ...................................................................................................................... 161
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
2
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Change Order is needed to incorporate a Cost Savings Initiative that was proposed by the Contractor for
the Chokoloskee Bridge Replacement Project. The CSI proposes a redesign of the foundation to eliminate the
need for 54” diameter cylinder piles and instead uses 24” square prestressed concrete piles. A more
detailed wave loading analysis was performed to justify eliminating hold-down devices. Changes to the
construction joint and phasing widths for the bridge are incorporated, which are a result of the new
foundation system. This CSI will result in a total savings of $1,048,849.66 to be split between Collier County
and Kelly Brothers, Inc. This savings will result in a reduction to the contract amount.
Original Contract Amount: $8,050,911.82
Contract Change due to this Change Order: ($545,190.19)
New Contract Amount after this Change Order: $7,505,721.63
Savings to Collier County $545,190.19
No additional Contract Days are required for this change as long as it is BOCC approved by December 13,
2016.
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
3
10/26/2016 Page 3
2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FROM REVIEW ENGINEERS
Collier County Staff requested two separate bridge design engineering firms evaluate the merits of the CSI
proposal.
1) T.Y. Lin International, the original Engineer of Record.
2) HighSpans Engineering, Inc., the CEI firm for the project.
Both firms replied positively, as long as final review comments are resolved; their respective letters included
herein.
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
4
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 5
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 6
2400 1st Street, Suite 200 | Fort Myers, Florida 33901 | T 239.332.4846 | F 239.332.4798 | www.tylin.com
November 22, 2016
Andrew Miller
Senior Project Manager
Collier County
Growth Management Department
Transportation Engineering Division
2885 S. Horseshoe Drive
Naples, FL 34104
Re: Chokoloskee Bridge Replacement, Cost Savings Initiative
Bid # 15-6447
Dear Mr. Miller,
We have reviewed the Cost Savings Initiate (CSI) prepared by Cardno, Inc. for Kelly Brothers,
Inc., dated 11/20/2016 as well as answers to subsequent questions we formulated. Based on the
information provided, we believe the CSI meets the intent and design criteria of the original plans
and therefore the bridge will meet or exceed the seventy-five (75) year design life. We
recommend the County accept the CSI Proposal.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
James W. Molnar, P.E.
Vice President
Cc: Boon Chong, PE
Vince Zaliauskas, PE
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
7
Project:Chokoloskee Bridge ReplacementDATE: 11/22/2016Project #:66066.9, Bid 15-6447REVISION No. 8HighSpans Engineering, Inc.1) CSI CONSTRUCTION COSTS ItemUnit PriceTotal AmountTotal QuantityUnitMeas Description102-71-1432.34$ $42,527.101315LFBARRIER WALL, TEMPORARY, F&I, TYPE K102-71-2417.49$ $19,186.531097LFBARRIER WALL, TEMPORARY, RELOCATE, TYPE K102-89-11,518.00$ $15,180.0010LFTEMPORARY CRASH CUSHION, REDIRECTIVE OPTION400- 4- 51,224.00$ $190,944.00156CYCLASS IV CONCRETE (SUBSTRUCTURE)400- 4- 25-$ $0.000CYCLASS IV CONCRETE (MASS, SUBSTR.) (DELETE)400-1430.67$ $8,894.2513275SFCLEAN AND COAT, CLASS V415-1-41.20$ $144,240.00120200LBREINFORCING STEEL (SUPER STRUCTURE) 415- 1- 51.32$ $23,760.0018000LBREINFORCING STEEL (SUBSTRUCTURE) 450- 2- 36375.00$ $421,875.001125LFPRESTRESSED BEAMS: FLORIDA-I BEAM 36"455-34-5409,310.40$ $409,310.401 LSPILES CONCRETE 24"455-143-597,889.33$ $97,889.331LSTEST PILE 24"460-1-152.65$ $6,069.642290.43 LB STRUCTURE STEEL - MISC1) SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $1,379,876.252) AS-BID CONTRACT COSTS102-71-1432.34$ $50,741.461569 LF BARRIER WALL, TEMPORARY, F&I, TYPE K102-71-2417.49$ $45,474.002600 LF BARRIER WALL, TEMPORARY, RELOCATE, TYPE K102-89-1 1,518.00$ $36,432.0024 LF TEMPORARY CRASH CUSHION, REDIRECTIVE OPTION400- 4- 5 1,224.00$ $88,250.4072.1 CY CLASS IV CONCRETE (SUBSTRUCTURE)400- 4- 25 630.00$ $165,879.00263.3 CY CLASS IV CONCRETE (MASS, SUBSTR.)400-1430.67$ $9,313.0013900 SF CLEAN AND COAT, CLASS V415-1-41.36$ $165,104.00121400 LB REINFORCING STEEL (SUPERSTRUCTURE) 415- 1- 51.32$ $120,648.0091400 LB REINFORCING STEEL (SUBSTRUCTURE) 450- 2- 36 396.61$ $446,186.251125 LF PRESTRESSED BEAMS: FLORIDA-I BEAM 36"455- 36- 1 1,505.00$ $1,225,070.00814 LF CONCRETE CYLINDER PILES (54" DIAM.)455-143- 8 1,681.86$ $351,508.74209 LF TEST PILES (CONC CYL PILE) (54" DIAM.)460-1-152.65$ $43,195.0016300 LB STRUCTURE STEEL - MISC2) SUBTOTAL CONTRACT COSTS$2,747,801.85ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF CSI COST SAVINGSCOST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 8
Project:Chokoloskee Bridge ReplacementDATE: 11/22/2016Project #:66066.9, Bid 15-6447REVISION No. 8HighSpans Engineering, Inc.ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF CSI COST SAVINGS3) CONSTRUCTION SAVINGS (2 - 1)$1,367,925.604) ENGINEERING COSTS999-CO4-1319,075.94$ $319,075.94 1 LSCONTRACTOR'S EOR, COASTAL & GEOTECHNICAL4) SUBTOTAL ENGINEERING COSTS $319,075.94 23% % OF CONSTRUCTION SAVINGS5) SAVINGS AFTER ENGINEERING COSTS (3 - 4)$1,048,849.66CONTRACTOR'S SHARE OF SAVINGS $524,424.83COUNTY'S SHARE OF SAVINGS $524,424.836) IMPLEMENTATION COSTS PAID BY THE COUNTY16,122.50$ $16,122.50 1 LSEOR COST25,408.22$ $25,408.22 1 LSCEI COST6) SUBTOTAL IMPLEMENTATION COSTS $41,530.72 3% % OF CONSTRUCTION SAVINGSCONTRACTOR'S SHARE OF COSTS $20,765.36COUNTY'S SHARE OF COSTS $20,765.367) SAVINGS AFTER IMPLEMENTATION COSTS999-C04-2 CONTRACTOR'S SHARE OF SAVINGS $503,659.478) CONTRACT AMOUNT CHANGESORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $8,050,911.82REDUCTION TO CONTRACT AMOUNT $545,190.19NEW CONTRACT AMOUNT $7,505,721.63COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 9
Chokoloskee Bridge Replacement Project Change Order 04
Project Number: 66066.9
Bid Number: 15-6447
ORIGINAL BID
PRICE
NEW UNIT
PRICE SWA PRICE
450- 2- 36 PREST BEAMS: FLORIDA-I BEAM 36" PROPOSED $ 396.61 $ 375.00 $ 222.31
This pay item deviates from the FDOT 6-month State Wide Average pricing. This was a change from the
bid price which was already higher than the Statewide Average. The bid price was lowered due to
removal of steel hardware. Transportation to the remote location also contributed to the increase in
price.
ORIGINAL BID
PRICE
NEW UNIT
PRICE SWA PRICE
415-1-4 REINFORCING STEEL (SUPERSTRUCTURE) $ 1.36 $ 1.20 $ 0.81
This pay item deviates from the FDOT 6-month State Wide Average pricing. This was a change from the
bid price which was already higher than the Statewide Average. Transportation to the remote location
contributed to the increase in price.
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE SWA PRICE
455-34-5 PILES CONCRETE 24" 1585 LF $ 258.24 $ 222.00
The lump sum pile cost was calculated using the linear footage and unit prices above. Transportation to
the remote location, 100% PDA, post-grouting, and geotech costs contributed to the increase in price.
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE SWA PRICE
455-143-5 TEST PILE 24" 209 LF $ 468.37 $ 320.00
The lump sum test pile cost was calculated using the linear footage and unit prices above. Cost of the
PDA and geotechnical engineering cost in the unit price. Transportation to the remote location, 100% PDA,
post-grouting, and geotech costs contributed to the increase in price.
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
10
CESPO0505/23/2016-13.23.23Page: 11Florida Department of TransportationItem Average Unit Cost From 2015/11/01 to 2016/04/30Contract Type: CC STATEWIDEDisplaying: VALID ITEMS WITH HITSFrom: 0102 1 To: 9999999No. of Weighted Total Total UnitItem Conts Average Amount Quantity Meas Obs? Description0443 70 6 3 $163.19 $754,432.24 4,623.000 LF N FRENCH DRAIN, 36"0444 70 11 1 $165.00 $26,400.00 160.000 LF N DEEP WELL- OPEN HOLE, 24"0444 71 11 1 $235.00 $188,000.00 800.000 LF N DEEP WELL CASING, 24"0446 1 1 3 $26.11 $1,166,126.80 44,659.000 LF N EDGEDRAIN DRAINCRETE, STANDARD0446 71 1 5 $26.04 $44,114.40 1,694.000 LF N EDGEDRAIN OUTLET PIPE, 4"0450 1 1 2 $134.83 $205,616.92 1,525.000 LF N PREST BEAMS, TYPE II0450 1124 1 $333.23 $171,280.22 514.000 LF N PREST BEAM, FDT 240450 2 36 2 $218.09 $331,490.00 1,520.000 LF N PREST BEAMS: FLORIDA-I BEAM 36"0450 3 11 1 $350.00 $43,750.00 125.000 LF N PRESTRESSED SLAB UNITS,48" X 12"0450 3 21 1 $350.00 $76,650.00 219.000 LF N PRESTRESSED SLAB UNITS,60" X 12"0450 83 1 1 $1,503.00 $223,947.00 149.000 EA N BEAM REPAIR, STRAND SPLICES0455 34 3 1 $200.00 $150,000.00 750.000 LF N PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PILING, 18" SQ0455 34 5 1 $222.00 $139,860.00 630.000 LF N PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PILING, 24" SQ0455 34203 4 $77.95 $681,285.90 8,740.000 LF N PREST CONC PILING, 100% DYN TEST, EXT 180455 34205 2 $83.74 $412,425.00 4,925.000 LF N PREST CONC PILING, 100% DYN TEST, EXT 240455 76 1 $400.00 $28,000.00 70.000 EA N WRAP PILE CLUSTERS0455 81102 1 $3,105.00 $93,150.00 30.000 EA N CATHODIC PROT,F&I,PILE,ZINC ANODE ASSEM0455133 2 3 $19.72 $1,593,213.70 80,797.000 SF N SHEET PILING STEEL, TEMPORARY-CRITICAL0455133 3 4 $34.03 $7,508,134.30 220,639.000 SF N SHEET PILING STEEL, F&I PERMANENT0455143 5 1 $320.00 $76,800.00 240.000 LF N TEST PILES-PREST CONCRETE,24" SQ0455143203 1 $334.58 $56,878.60 170.000 LF N TEST PILES- PRESTR CONC, EXT 18"0455143205 1 $320.00 $38,400.00 120.000 LF N TEST PILES- PRESTR CONC, EXT 24"0457 1 22 1 $1,630.00 $171,150.00 105.000 LF N STD INTEGRAL PILE JKT, STR, 16 to 300457 2121 1 $1,400.00 $137,200.00 98.000 LF N CATH PROT INTE PILE JA, NON-STR, 16.1-300457 2211 1 $1,900.00 $619,400.00 326.000 LF N CATH PROT INTE PILE JA, STR,UP TO 160457 2221 2 $1,741.84 $402,365.84 231.000 LF N CATH PROT INTE PILE JA, STR, 16.1-300458 1 11 10 $42.13 $114,931.45 2,728.000 LF N BRIDGE DECK EXPANSION JNT,NEW,POURED0458 1 21 15 $78.83 $525,816.62 6,670.000 LF N BRIDGE DECK EXPANSION JNT, REHAB,POURED0458 1 23 1 $254.40 $46,046.40 181.000 LF N BRIDGE DECK EXPANSION JNT, REHAB,MODULAR0458 1 24 1 $1,300.00 $330,200.00 254.000 LF N BRIDGE DECK EXPAN JNT,REHAB,FINGER JNT0458 1 25 1 $194.00 $13,386.00 69.000 LF N BRIDGE DECK EXPAN JNT, REHAB,COMPRESSION0458 1 26 1 $141.00 $271,425.00 1,925.000 LF N BRIDGE DECK EXPANSION JNT, REHAB,OTHER0458 2 5 $664.69 $261,089.70 392.800 CF N POLYMER NOSING FOR BRIDGE DECK EXPANSION0460 1 3 1 $38.00 $160,588.00 4,226.000 LB N STRUCT STEEL-REHAB, SHOE ASSEMBLIES0460 1 11 1 $8.00 $10,560.00 1,320.000 LB N STRUCT STEEL REHAB-SCREW, BOLT & WASH0460 1 13 1 $40.20 $126,630.00 3,150.000 LB N STRUCT STEEL REHAB-BOLT, NUT, WASH & PLT0460 1 15 6 $38.53 $882,328.09 22,902.000 LB N STRUCT STEEL - REHAB, MISC.0460 2 2 1 $6.11 $91,039.00 14,900.000 LB N STRUCT STEEL, LOW ALLOY0460 2 15 1 $9.52 $6,997.20 735.000 LB N STRUCT STEEL, MISCELLANEOUS0460 6 1 2 $420,778.00 $841,556.00 2.000 LS N LADDERS & PLATFORMS, NEW CONSTRUCTIONCOST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 11
3.0 CSI SPECIFICATION
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
12
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
13
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
14
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
15
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
16
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
17
4.0 CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL ’S PROPOSAL
4.1 Description
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
18
15775 Pine Ridge Road, Fort Myers, FL 33908
P: (239) 482-7300 F: (239) 482-8014
www.kellybros.net
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to FDOT Specification 4-3.9 Cost Savings Initiative Proposal (CSI), Kelly Brothers Inc.
(KBI) would like to initiate and develop a CSI that will increase cost effectiveness and
significantly improve the quality of the end results by reducing future maintenance cost. The CSI
will result in savings without impairing essential functions and characteristics such as safety,
service, life, reliability, economy of operation, ease of maintenance, aesthetics and necessary
standard design features.
It will require KBI to do a full re-design of bridge using the 2014 FDOT design standards (same
as existing design). The focus of the re-design will be on re-calculating the bridge reaction to the
wave forces using a more detailed level II analysis and implementing the bridge design
accordingly. The original design used a less detailed less expensive level I analysis.
This will include eliminating the current complex beam anchorage system, providing concrete
keeper blocks on the bents, and re-designing the superstructure, substructure, and foundation.
The bridge will utilize prestressed FIB-36 beams with cast-in-place deck and the bridge
foundation will utilize 24” precast prestressed concrete piles (PPCP). The re-design will also
increase the horizontal clearance for boat traffic.
· New design will have the same loading capacities as the original design.
· New design will meet or exceed all FDOT design standards (2014).
· New design will increase the horizontal clearance for boat traffic.
· New design will eliminate complex beam anchorage system that would have required
future maintenance
THE DATE BY WHICH THIS PROPOSAL MUST BE BOCC APPROVED AND NOT
AFFECT THE ORIGINAL COMPLETION DATE IS DECEMBER 13, 2016.
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
19
15775 Pine Ridge Road, Fort Myers, FL 33908
P: (239) 482-7300 F: (239) 482-8014
www.kellybros.net
ORIGINAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A three span prestressed concrete girder bridge will be used to traverse the Chokoloskee Bay along
CR 29. The new bridge will consist of:
· Foundation of 54” cylinder piles (nonessential/added cost) not manufactured in
Florida (trucking) require specialty equipment (added cost)
· Mass concrete type caps that consist of large amounts of concrete
(nonessential/added cost)
· Three 75'-0" long spans bridge on a part of a 550'-0" vertical curve. The bridge
will be not be skewed.
· Overall bridge deck width of 52'-0" (two 12'-0" lanes, two 8'-0" shoulders, and
one 8'-2" sidewalk.
· 5 FIB-36 beams anchored with galvanized barring assemblies (nonessential/future
maintenance).
· Combination steel sheet pile wall with galvanized coating approaches at both ends of the bridge
· Point/patch, and add a new cap to the existing seawall.
REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A three span prestressed concrete girder bridge will be used to traverse the Chokoloskee Bay along
CR 29. The revised bridge will consist of:
· Foundation of 24” concrete piles (cost savings) manufactured in Florida (less
trucking) do not require specialty equipment (cost savings)
· Standard size Caps (cost savings)
· Three 75'-0" long spans bridge on a part of a 550'-0" vertical curve. The bridge
will be not be skewed.
· Overall bridge deck width of 52'-0" (two 12'-0" lanes, two 8'-0" shoulders, and
one 8'-2" sidewalk.
· PZ40 steel sheet pile wall with galvanized coating approaches at both ends of the bridge
(heavier pile section than original at no additional cost)
· 5 FIB-36 beams setting on barring pads and secured with concrete shear blocks
(eliminates need for maintenance on galvanized anchor blocks and reduces the
cost of future pad replacements).
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
20
15775 Pine Ridge Road, Fort Myers, FL 33908
P: (239) 482-7300 F: (239) 482-8014
www.kellybros.net
Please see attached sheet for detailed cost savings:
PRELIMINARY SAVINGS $1,367,925.60
TOTAL SAVINGS $1,048,849.66
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
21
4 .2 Detailed Cost Estimate
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
22
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 23
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 24
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 25
4 .3 Itemization of Changes , Roles & Responsibilities
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
26
Sheet #TYLin Plan Set Sheet Title CSI Action Cardno Plan Set Sheet Title
1 Key Sheet Remains Unchanged
2 Summary of Pay Items Remains Unchanged
3 Typical Sections Remains Unchanged
4 Typical Sections Remains Unchanged
5 Typical Sections Remains Unchanged
6 Summary of Quantities Remains Unchanged
7 General Notes Remains Unchanged
8 Roadway Plans Remains Unchanged
9 Roadway Plans Remains Unchanged
10 Roadway Plans Remains Unchanged
11 Profile Remains Unchanged
12 Profile Remains Unchanged
13 Profile Remains Unchanged
14 Cross Sections Remains Unchanged
15 Cross Sections Remains Unchanged
16 Cross Sections Remains Unchanged
17 Cross Sections Remains Unchanged
18 Cross Sections Remains Unchanged
19 Cross Sections Remains Unchanged
20 Cross Sections Remains Unchanged
21 Cross Sections Remains Unchanged
22 Cross Sections Remains Unchanged
23 Cross Sections Remains Unchanged
24 Cross Sections Remains Unchanged
25 Drainage Structures Remains Unchanged
26 Traffic Control General Notes Remains Unchanged
27 Traffic Control Typical Sections Remains Unchanged
28 Traffic Control Typical Sections Remains Unchanged
29 Traffic Control Typical Sections Remains Unchanged
30 Traffic Control Plans Phase 1A Remains Unchanged
31 Traffic Control Plans Phase 1A Remains Unchanged
32 Traffic Control Plans Phase 1A Remains Unchanged
33 Traffic Control Plans Phase 1B Remains Unchanged
34 Traffic Control Plans Phase 1B Remains Unchanged
35 Traffic Control Plans Phase 1B Remains Unchanged
36 Traffic Control Plans Phase 1C Remains Unchanged
37 Traffic Control Plans Phase 1C Remains Unchanged
38 Traffic Control Plans Phase 1C Remains Unchanged
39 Traffic Control Plans Phase 2A Remains Unchanged
40 Traffic Control Plans Phase 2A Remains Unchanged
41 Traffic Control Plans Phase 2A Remains Unchanged
42 Traffic Control Plans Phase 2A Remains Unchanged
43 Traffic Control Plans Phase 2B/2C Remains Unchanged
44 Traffic Control Plans Phase 2B/2C Remains Unchanged
45 Traffic Control Plans Phase 2B/2C Remains Unchanged
46 Traffic Control Plans Phase 2B/2C Remains Unchanged
47 Traffic Control Plans Phase 3A Remains Unchanged
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
27
48 Traffic Control Plans Phase 3A Remains Unchanged
49 Traffic Control Plans Phase 3A Remains Unchanged
50 Traffic Control Plans Phase 3B Remains Unchanged
51 Utility Adjustment Remains Unchanged
52 Utility Adjustment Remains Unchanged
53 Utility Adjustment Remains Unchanged
54 Stormwater Prevention Plan Remains Unchanged
55 Stormwater Prevention Plan Remains Unchanged
56 SWPPP Details Remains Unchanged
57 SWPPP Details Remains Unchanged
58 SWPPP Details Remains Unchanged
59 SWPPP Details Remains Unchanged
60 S&PM Summary of Quantities Remains Unchanged
61 Signing and Pavement Marking Remains Unchanged
62 Signing and Pavement Marking Remains Unchanged
63 Signing and Pavement Marking Remains Unchanged
64 Signing and Pavement Marking Remains Unchanged
65 Navigational Lighting Details Remains Unchanged
66 Project Information Sign Remains Unchanged
B-1 Index of Drawings Replaced with Index of Drawings
B-2 General Notes (1 of 3)Replaced with General Notes (1 of 3)
B-3 General Notes (2 of 3)Replaced with General Notes (2 of 3)
B-4 General Notes (3 of 3)Replaced with General Notes (3 of 3)
B1-1 General Plan and Elevation (1 of 2)Replaced with General Plan and Elevation (1 of 2)
B1-2 General Plan and Elevation (2 of 2)Replaced with General Plan and Elevation (2 of 2)
B1-3 Bridge Construction Sequence (1 of 2)Replaced with Bridge Hydraulic Recommendation
B1-4 Bridge Construction Sequence (2 of 2)Replaced with Construction Sequence (1 of 2)
B1-5 Bridge Hydraulic Recommendation Replaced with Construction Sequence (2 of 2)
B1-6 Foundation Layout Replaced with Foundation Layout
B1-7 Report of Core Borings Replaced with Report of Core Borings
B1-8 Pile Data Table Replaced with Pile Data Table
B1-9 End Bents Replaced with 24" Sq Prestressed Piles
B1-10 End Bent Details Replaced with End Bent Plan/Elev
B1-11 Intermediate Bents Replaced with End Bent Details
B1-12 Intermediate Bent Details Replaced with Intermediate Bent Plan/Elev
B1-13 Section Through Bridge (1 of 2)Replaced with Intermediate Bent Details
B1-14 Section Through Bridge (2 of 2)Replaced with Section Through Bridge (1 of 2)
B1-15 Finish Grade Elevation (1 of 2)Replaced with Section Through Bridge (2 of 2)
B1-16 Finish Grade Elevation (2 of 2)Replaced with Finish Grade Elevation (1 of 2)
B1-17 Superstructure Plan (1 of 2)Replaced with Finish Grade Elevation (2 of 2)
B1-18 Superstructure Plan (2 of 2)Replaced with Superstructure Plan
B1-19 Superstructure Details (1 of 4)Replaced with Superstructure Details (1 of 3)
B1-20 Superstructure Details (2 of 4)Replaced with Superstructure Details (2 of 3)
B1-21 Superstructure Details (3 of 4)Replaced with Superstructure Details (3 of 3)
B1-22 Superstructure Details (4 of 4)Replaced with Diaphragm Details (1 of 3)
B1-23 Bearing Details (1 of 3)Replaced with Diaphragm Details (2 of 3)
B1-24 Bearing Details (2 of 3)Replaced with Diaphragm Details (3 of 3)
B1-25 Bearing Details (3 of 3)Replaced with Beam Table
B1-26 Diaphragm Details (1 of 2)Replaced with Approach Slab Details
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
28
B1-27 Diaphragm Details (2 of 2)Replaced with Reinforcing Bar List (1 of 2)
B1-28 Beam Table Replaced with Load Rating
B1-29 Traffic Railing Details Deleted
B1-30 Approach Slab Details Deleted
B1-31 Reinforcing Bar List (1 of 2)Deleted
B1-32 Reinforcing Bar List (2 of 2)Deleted
B1-33 Load Rating Deleted
BW-1 Sheet Pile Wall Notes (1 of 2)Replaced with Sheet Pile Wall Notes (1 of 2)
BW-2 Sheet Pile Wall Notes (2 of 2)Replaced with Sheet Pile Wall Notes (2 of 2)
BW-3 Sheet Pile Retaining Wall (1 of 2)Replaced with Sheet Pile Retaining Wall (1 of 2)
BW-4 Sheet Pile Retaining Wall (2 of 2)Replaced with Sheet Pile Retaining Wall (2 of 2)
BW-5 Sheet Pile Wall Details (1 of 4)Replaced with Sheet Pile Wall Details (1 of 4)
BW-6 Sheet Pile Wall Details (2 of 4)Replaced with Sheet Pile Wall Details (2 of 4)
BW-7 Sheet Pile Wall Details (3 of 4)Replaced with Sheet Pile Wall Details (3 of 4)
BW-8 Sheet Pile Wall Details (4 of 4)Remains Unchanged
BW-9 Reinforcing Bar List Remains Unchanged
BW-10 Bulkhead Repair Detail (1 of 2)Remains Unchanged
BW-11 Bulkhead Repair Detail (2 of 2)Remains Unchanged
BW-12 Temporary Retaining Wall (1 of 2)Replaced with Temporary Retaining Wall (1 of 2)
BW-13 Temporary Retaining Wall (2 of 2)Replaced with Temporary Retaining Wall (2 of 2)
W1 Key Sheet Remains Unchanged
W2 General Utility Notes Remains Unchanged
W3 Utilities Plans & Profile Remains Unchanged
W4 Utilities Plans & Profile Remains Unchanged
W5 Utilities Plans & Profile Remains Unchanged
W6 Water Details Remains Unchanged
W7 Water Details Remains Unchanged
W8 Water Details Remains Unchanged
W9 Water Details Remains Unchanged
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
29
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 30
15775 Pine Ridge Road, Fort Myers, FL 33908
P: (239) 482-7300 F: (239) 482-8014
www.kellybros.net
Concrete will be supplied by Cemex utilizing the Southern Naples plant located on US 41, the
back-up plants will be plants A&B located on Auto Ranch road Naples Florida.
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
31
4 .4 Target Date for Approval
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
32
15775 Pine Ridge Road, Fort Myers, FL 33908
P: (239) 482-7300 F: (239) 482-8014
www.kellybros.net
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to FDOT Specification 4-3.9 Cost Savings Initiative Proposal (CSI), Kelly Brothers Inc.
(KBI) would like to initiate and develop a CSI that will increase cost effectiveness and
significantly improve the quality of the end results by reducing future maintenance cost. The CSI
will result in savings without impairing essential functions and characteristics such as safety,
service, life, reliability, economy of operation, ease of maintenance, aesthetics and necessary
standard design features.
It will require KBI to do a full re-design of bridge using the 2014 FDOT design standards (same
as existing design). The focus of the re-design will be on re-calculating the bridge reaction to the
wave forces using a more detailed level II analysis and implementing the bridge design
accordingly. The original design used a less detailed less expensive level I analysis.
This will include eliminating the current complex beam anchorage system, providing concrete
keeper blocks on the bents, and re-designing the superstructure, substructure, and foundation.
The bridge will utilize prestressed FIB-36 beams with cast-in-place deck and the bridge
foundation will utilize 24” precast prestressed concrete piles (PPCP). The re-design will also
increase the horizontal clearance for boat traffic.
· New design will have the same loading capacities as the original design.
· New design will meet or exceed all FDOT design standards (2014).
· New design will increase the horizontal clearance for boat traffic.
· New design will eliminate complex beam anchorage system that would have required
future maintenance
THE DATE BY WHICH THIS PROPOSAL MUST BE BOCC APPROVED AND NOT
AFFECT THE ORIGINAL COMPLETION DATE IS DECEMBER 13, 2016.
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
33
4 .5 Revised Project Schedule
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
34
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 35
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 36
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 37
4 .6 Proposed Plans
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
38
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 39
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 40
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 41
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 42
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 43
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 44
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 45
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 46
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 47
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 48
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 49
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 50
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 51
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 52
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 53
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 54
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 55
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 56
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 57
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 58
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 59
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 60
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 61
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 62
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 63
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 64
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 65
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 66
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 67
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 68
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 69
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 70
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 71
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 72
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 73
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 74
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 75
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 76
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 77
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 78
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 79
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 80
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 81
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 82
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 83
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 84
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 85
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 86
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 87
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 88
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 89
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 90
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 91
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 92
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 93
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 94
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 95
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 96
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 97
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 98
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 99
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 100
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 101
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 102
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 103
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 104
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 105
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 106
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 107
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 108
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 109
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 110
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 111
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 112
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 113
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 114
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 115
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 116
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 117
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 118
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 119
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 120
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 121
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 122
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 123
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 124
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 125
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 126
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 127
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 128
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 129
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 130
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 131
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 132
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 133
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 134
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 135
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 136
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 137
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 138
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 139
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 140
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 141
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 142
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 143
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 144
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 145
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 146
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 147
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 148
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 149
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
150
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
151
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
152
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
153
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
154
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
155
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
156
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
157
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
158
4.7 Engineering Analysis
ATTACHMENT AVAILABLE AT THE FOLLOWING LINK. OMITTED FOR SIZE.
Copy/Paste the link below into your browser.
https://highspans.sharepoint.com/Team
Site/CEI/ChokoloskeeBridge/_layouts/
15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken
=dff5od8vfbE0g2JXgpk1TBkd4UTUmn
PD9VqW8jAFgcc%3d&docid=0570b2
c3d68fb4ef8b365abb99eca9764&rev
=1
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
159
4.8 Bridge Hydraulic Report & Wave Loading
ATTACHMENT AVAILABLE AT THE FOLLOWING LINK. OMITTED FOR SIZE.
Copy/Paste the link below into your browser.
https://highspans.sharepoint.com/Team
Site/CEI/ChokoloskeeBridge/_layouts/
15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken
=IAoYSIxpVtNYXKTkxa47dp7pUh7LCd
IehOIbsMJ74oc%3d&docid=019787a
5a358b450e95ba78f8fb4ad683&rev
=1
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
160
4.9 Geotechnical Report
ATTACHMENT AVAILABLE AT THE FOLLOWING LINK. OMITTED FOR SIZE.
Copy/Paste the link below into your browser.
https://highspans.sharepoint.com/Team
Site/CEI/ChokoloskeeBridge/_layouts/
15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken
=w49bjkVV2hGJ3guZfs7Q9AUrF1sv2JI
TkICUtEaGBAg%3d&docid=0e804cb7
7d9fa456e897e0fdd905066a1&rev=
1
COST SAVINGS INITIATIVE (CSI) for the CHOKOLOSKEE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
161