Loading...
Agenda 12/13/2016 Item #10A 10.A 12/13/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to direct the County Attorney to advertise and bring back to the Board an ordinance that will implement a twelve month moratorium on new applications for development orders for uses authorized by the Commercial Four (C-4) and Commercial Five (C-5) zoning districts,as well as gas stations,pawn shops and car washes in all commercial districts on both sides of U.S. 41 from the Palm Street/Commercial Drive/U.S.41 intersection to the Price Street/U.S.41 intersection, and direct staff to develop and bring forward Land Development Code amendments to promote the Vision for the East Trail Corridor Study Note by County Attorney: Approval of this item will immediately commence the moratorium period pending future Board action on the Ordinance. OBJECTIVE: To direct the County Attorney to advertise and bring back to the Board an ordinance that will implement a twelve month moratorium on new applications for development within the C-4 and C-5 zoning districts (only applicable to C-4 and C-5 uses not authorized in the Commercial 1, 2 and 3 zoning districts), as well as gas stations, pawn shops and car washes in all commercial zoning districts on US41 between the Palm Street/Commercial Drive/U.S.41 intersection and the Price Street/U.S.41 intersection, while Land Development Code amendments are vetted with the public, and through the County's advisory boards to implement the East Naples Corridor Study(Attachment"A"). CONSIDERATIONS: The proposed amendments will examine the intensity, compatibility, and land use effects of the various commercial land uses authorized by C-4 and C-5 zoning districts, as well as gas stations, pawn shops and car washed in all commercial districts and their relationship to promoting the vision of the East Naples Corridor Study developed by the East Naples Foundation. The analysis is relevant based on the current pattern of strip commercial zoning districts that dominate the U.S. 41 corridor. The corridor is currently comprised of shallow C-3, C-4, C-5 and Commercial Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning districts, which provides for a potential inconsistent commercial development pattern for the area and a limitation to the types of specific commercial uses that are promoted within the Corridor Study. Some of the more intense land uses authorized by the C-4 and C-5 zoning districts, as well as gas stations, pawn shops and car washes may be inconsistent with the vision desired for the corridor and based upon this inconsistency; the LDC amendment process will focus. It should be noted that this moratorium will not be applicable to existing Commercial Planned Unit Developments. FISCAL IMPACT: Impacts will be identified at time of adoption of the proposed land development code amendments. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: The individual land uses authorized within the various commercial zoning districts along the identified U.S. 41 corridor (Attachment "B") is not specified by the Growth Management Plan, therefore no impact is anticipated with the adoption of this moratorium or the corresponding implementing LDC amendments. Packet Pg. 148 10.A" 12/13/2016 LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: The Second District Court of Appeals adopted the "pending ordinance doctrine" in the case of Smith v. City of Clearwater, 383 So.2d 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), rev. den. 403 So.2d 407. The court in Smith, supra at 689, stated that an applicant is entitled to a permit under existing regulations only if the proposed regulation that would preclude the intended use is not "pending" when application is made. A proposed governmental action is deemed "pending" if there are active and documented efforts by those authorized to develop and prepare the proposed regulatory change, and the local governing board or planning board is aware of these efforts. Smith, supra, at 689. In other words, upon approval of this item, staff will no longer accept applications for new development orders seeking approval of commercial land uses within the identified boundary of the U.S.41 corridor until the Land Development Code amendments are heard by the Board. With that said, this item is approved as to form and legality. A majority vote is needed for approval of County Attorney and staff direction. However, an affirmative vote of four is needed for the potential future growth management plan and the land development code amendment. -JAK RECOMMENDATION: To 1) Direct the County Attorney to advertise and bring back to the Board an ordinance that will implement a twelve month moratorium on new applications for development orders for the specified commercial uses and zoning districts within the identified U.S. 41 corridor, and (2) Direct staff to develop and bring forward Land Development Code amendments regarding commercial land uses that will advance the vision of the East Naples Corridor Study. Prepared by: Commissioner Donna Fiala,District 1 Attachment"A"-East Naples Corridor Study Attachment"B" -Map of Moratorium Area ATTACHMENT(S) 1. east naples-corridor study-2010-attachment-a (PDF) 2.41 Corridor-Moratorium-Area-attachemnt-b (PDF) Packet Pg149 10.A 12/13/2016 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 10.A Item Summary: Recommendation to direct the County Attorney to advertise and bring back to the Board an ordinance that will implement a twelve month moratorium on new applications for development orders for uses authorized by the Commercial Four(C-4) and Commercial Five(C-5) zoning districts, as well as gas stations, pawn shops and car washes in all commercial districts on both sides of U.S. 41 from the Palm Street/Commercial Drive/U.S.41 intersection to the Price Street/U.S.41 intersection, and direct staff to develop and bring forward Land Development Code amendments to promote the Vision for the East Trail Corridor Study Note by County Attorney: Approval of this item will immediately commence the moratorium period pending future Board action on the Ordinance. Meeting Date: 12/13/2016 Prepared by: Title: Executive Secretary to County Manager—County Manager's Office Name: MaryJo Brock 12/07/2016 4:03 PM Submitted by: Title: County Manager—County Manager's Office Name: Leo E.Ochs 12/07/2016 4:03 PM Approved By: Review: Office of Management and Budget MaryJo Brock Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Skipped 12/07/2016 4:02 PM County Attorney's Office MaryJo Brock Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Skipped 12/07/2016 4:02 PM County Manager's Office Leo E.Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 12/07/2016 4:16 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 12/13/2016 9:00 AM Packet Pg.150 1 O.A.1 i-‘,.11,74"-----`3k' S ;4g,=.2.--,=.4.: .. .T. r.-"'"-,Ck t $!!-3 j A :.-c.,...'‘. - Xr ' -- Tc _' �4 kt -^•re Lam..' ''" tom = Art,-.'- hrt 'Laid- �' Lr`Yd + s 3Y;�r Yr> 3' a�`. t ,.., `C e {. s.--140.,4,,,- "nr i ..',....-i- - ,..-',1d fit , t. *`'' -:_'',....r, ,tf; s A ;.- ' R ems'.-• 3�i�'' � ,- "'S" q� ',14.1-ii-z_.%,1`, S, •f;.,}+to •' ,,, z .Yi a '3 ,1 L t'r ye ;,- t L {FP�«�yT..5, S �x ,i--f- a. use �=� =a• m t..izf 1---• � moi' a , �Y .. - , ` } E ,4-7--„a-,,-.,1,-,-." am'.. -''(({ • A Y.r�.7- . �" • Y �-r1 -.1,4--„i-',../.; 01 > --.-r-_-,.-1-.i 4 # .�� .4 -uN. td, dX _ a. .•1!_!--1-,--it. ..-4, s7 P ^��,-.1,4g-4-;.--1401. 4:-4S T-.1, i 1. - 4 rk 1 a•_ �e,.4 st- - .r- r is --; dar r _ir .0 .-.- iia^ .,rater, _,x'15:.6,;.e-7- # ^ �„�„ • , s .. ..-.:•2_.,.,—, At'Y y,'.t �i'pryg �r6- ' " �, ''' • ac...-_ 3�: i i s�^r^ '4%.,--,v12. 4.3.-,i ,4 ,: 4'i?-.�, i "+r -. .S- '-'..r,:4147.07; %a.r�-? - _ 't' 74Y '.,m. t. -.;..1--4..p---tti ,, s,.•_.-- �A -;"1. I 'c xs4 n r- x sr. rr a �`E, -- ' j .. '-'7-4,"•-_-:;.''; .r, �'J' Fr.+'''''.."::17.. -4:- ,�'�-'h" ��':"'^ r ."aJ� }�'_+a -,:,,,,N•CY' rd D.-•_', ":y 7. .4,:,,,,' -'4";...“7-74 ' "�"�"� Asx. ;a� 1°5v'.''y. jam ",. ,R� .,^e`G.*^ 3+ a +f+ �r•o y �y s�cwt -17.-g9 r p t y a s k [ '`s fr A v „" _ Y ,,8N is . r-1,1., ,IY.-,.....-..-44,311/41"z? r�: w�ra4wJccr�atrtz "ea s ' �3{ s y� 3� � '. • ,p� i _ 9 Fc 1 _; •,tet t ' s� d ..'-: f '� .�,` +, c ti - 'i,d— , . s -- ''-' �r + t 1' --- "�' 7 - F irc ^= sa^ 'kr i'` ; ..` is Ittt1 y c 1- .V r"Yl',.. r+i- ^, , ' 1-.Y"'t� v„ �_4.4' -t.' ci, rTSai3 -7 -:-;•-44'. !;544-Altf ;6' F r a �,. .'as-' 44;ill +' ''" r ::. 7 f•. o- ,r`sf. P• ...4A "rte ':si r`Y +r 4' 3 =F --1,7.. .--V' a s r t- ,.r.' .ti. c ,q4 - T� �{� � ) �s !�r>3•"!4` i4 t 14 � p r' La� •"i � � a.l"�Jr�Y� �� u ::� :i ,• ti--.44. T ,—;:g;,-,_ ''5 t :2eL� �,..... - : • b//:-` ; v T .'.-::=,1 z�-r. 'R�yyy 15. ., s,. , ez* .1..............g..� .e„lu..1 i -r '”" '`�} ��.yam •z`rte 5*t+ p r yh 7,,,%. ,%.'"sl' rte▪ ` 4).....-.-11,-1:` 1.. +• _t, • z - ' ' e, o. a.."'• � £ -:,.;r4'-:;•'..-5' s'"§'"'--^c.-5�c� {t c.,'._kk --;%-: t o � i x ..,,, ,,-;,-;,-,..kc-,,,_ ap isa: ,- � c ` ,'k -C rs`', $ y �q r ::i 7f O rTT 'A,',,''', �L a "4.,....e,'-;:--.7-';-,1-...4,-.; $ _ ? AS r '.( •'c re-"c '�'.a' „z`g1Y?�' w r.,,,,.„..,,„..y..,. ' _ . +t ,`�� ' ',, ,_s' -,:::•‘...-x., '�-.y,7-- , .,ha h`''y rr„•3 i n } '4 3: ---4.2...1-,,.- I-1' sty • ,.ri -;•.4,4,..:0:10,.. ,.r•� - V - `.,k _gid. - ,-..--1..., ,s1.„: .•/:,...,,,-34":-'4,-7. *,--t �• '.:r!� ..`.:1 ep.ry`,'.:..„Y .„,..r.1,,,. a;, ' a+ 1.nF tAl'�a ▪ `. >!• d 'Fs mt�'-,11,-vg. . r„ 1 ar '3 r t a t. a ` ��ea 4"'.0 i -,. .---" ,....;,*44, _ #rr' 'kt.t. a. .�, r-,. '� :'� '", a 'ti•'. Lei- ". 6 O a cs `T D-4 1 # • � .v -r--�.� te3 '" * - a!-.: 2 rty 7 e .�.a. � --*ii*": � .,�Yy� -Rs .�, Z '4',-..t,..,,-...F'- ~ � 1'-.,,�� �. J�f,�R �Tf sr. ,a��'`°t� t'� � IC J` ,.F .�# -q. '• ...1 { #{ _ 14-- s%i.#y� ~Jays c .-,-- , = •a"'. ¢ - '- lYll`, _ s h, 7 Z r� = ,O �, ��'r -vc � '�, ,ajs+"' (, e r �s i. ,�.` ^mss - a Y� 't > 74`,! as# T- sss A131 i'• �d +.s 5 2 f'+r r! ......"7-,'t. , a.'rJF"+ ., ' 'l°, x s y T �,.- ,Y� d r' .t 'c �-s 1 s iI -7F 'r s -k sc* -ry 's' r" s w. .1r--1-4,-.,!;,-. ""' 7. .-44.....* s' ,- 'tw` r ,,• -v > ti 'y +1 z a ...av'y c -i -'}'�* r ' t'4 iii .,--,,IT 5 ,. -"• -,. .. R.� J.....3,.-..t-,1- yc� ;r'-`- � �.51.114-14.., } �'.+dam, ,�. r-c� '`' � �� �� '" ! i ko 1.tie % '''-'---1,."74`'.9' ,..1..-.v. } t''t y' ,, +•.r. :▪ �•..., x'{ A''i t t i.- ` +..' E`„F - • ,.4 , t r$f w 4 5..,., r +�"' --,,,i..it`�� c t .E N.-.7,,, a x "' "- „`•'F .�. C a F •3 ,y ave"' n y..-4r, - a Y,�^ ,.� 'sf_. ,..,-,,„:2,-....,:_,,.--.... a t!-yet` # Cc1 VV.�� yv' •.u{�Y'hty Y ! R -( x [ ( i t l r. r j.(�+3 '�'i W"'T yg•" t .'l 'c1-' ak'v. y 6= 3f3y� �tl '7� ' Y11 �. 13n ev ;r �,��3" ��' �.a, .r. .= 1? '^n. � fur � �r _. ?iP l7 ..m xr.�` �a','. •r � C_- 5, `' c^$f, ... s z _ a „,,,,-:-'_."—.----•-*'---me , , r ',, c�t r'31't; ..`` a ' t ks u3a'.' r 1-,: ..:•'.: s�4-„. c. t#' z. - 1(3 Jy �`'` - Lr T”, � ,L 'S':. e m U r. .-- +1 `'-pi`: �w� "' .2., r + 1 ' t �'�-#., !ice • 1:_,•/.-""t''',"• us:,. r'S iT t +f� a s� 1. k... v>t a 8r �ay� r LTA S � y''-"'f3 fi^ � 7�i.,�'�y�' (�. �"�,�•µ �-. ., Y':s� ^. r ,..�^'.TICS" ar�t�.�� '3�#• �.s'�--4,-.Pit �} 'r�,.� [ � sy?�'!s: a 1 .,_ $ ' 3-.' -. ,-, H`i�` '�.,4..,-7,..,-.-.1...i-,..,... i5 4 � t f 5;.Fa'. `�" ..'a.i '.te T'-....}Y` . 7._;il. .4 cy b 1- s 7 2- ' ''' say.--• t.,},4, V r ,i- a F u .. - els ^ ',`.''t a e 3 r t "'•.T, O m "Y ems- ye +-- .- $-' -�- 7r5-J '-3. z "F ' :�• ,fk 0. ..t..,.,_:...`s 4` ''tea �_„! N -yam r 5 Tom".' 7,-,r 41- ?rg i }..„-- -.t.'•&..4.4.„4„ ,._ k ._._ L. ,L ;,-,-..q.--- 1,.,:,,e, " 1,.,: fit...¢-:'I _ �. ' m r, �- „ ,A74:,....„„::_. .a: .� -.4_,--:-. ..,,..14-,....-T,,,,..4.0- r „r r+ ..a- 3'"z -'rte' . y” �y r`"` s. .V�?t t 's-aia- ••tii t r' ,�'rr 4 ,„..4--L.-,- -:-.1-_,.,,-2 .---,7,..,-_ .1...,,,,-1-4 ,7044:5k#1. . ': 4,, P^� `J _ c,r._ `.`; .... r `'" s.` ' .. ;_ ar �` t `i� ����"'`#iys'St`, .47- s.. y-r w� ,x-sz`... ..+r�r� e ,- •L tlic..._. „... ... ....._ T4 ,ter ..... '.:: -.,-,, .' 'its^.+c +.,....,.. ''C-.. a..v.....%,„,„4..,.....''rr S .:_,,....t.,.,,,..,...%.......„f.,..-....7-,r a "' e.r:�� -e �--''-- -- -, �tSz�.l-# 3..zv%rn-t, ,�' am=' _ �ia.�,< _w r_a_ N , - �i as CU _..- Vision for rho d ,4,2,;,,,,,,.,.,2,,,,,..,▪ ,,, _ 'A.,_-:,,,,,,,,-1-.„: . . ._ .,,,,-114;'-'4,4.-.,----_-:.-- ----,7,-.77,TT.fl-;;;;P:i. East Trail Corridor Li y� i•T c Lam ° w: tai r� civ a �1d t l I.0-,1 !`a tom ' �'•i--.- ..p'./ .,-*.-.•&,‘ ,. :tf nrz s:kr' ° ..:4"'"..- r...h^c,',� t�.t .=.a•. _ ,...z�".. rye'' - .--s-- x-:—�a 'z_t'`". -+-,- - •^'.•e.';C4'- r , . • i-s•c�^S r=r--�« x?;.�rs -a. :._,^. ATTACHMENT "C" Packet Pg. 151 10.A.1 'I.\1071 MI tin Ecmi T77111 ( U1't'iditir Table of Contents E 1 nil odu et ion Master lean Study Proces's Context 3 Histor Laud Use Characteristics > Circulation °' Population Characteristics •• Neighborhoods and Housing Condit.ous Economic Conditions and Trends N Environmental Characteristics Past Planning Efforts a E Exist Trail\j isioning Process 10 Public Invoh ement Applic4tble Planning Principles The East Trail Vision Statement 14 .> Goals &Strategies N Attachment: Vision Concept Plan Appendix: Demographic page from Economic Development Council a - of Collier County s"Market Facts 2008-2009" Public Input Meeting documentsca as c a> f6 Packet Pg. 152 1 O.A.1 Vision for the East Trail Corridor The East Naples Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that is continuing the community project initiated by the East Naples Civic Association's Strategic Planning Committee. This project is an endeavor to create a plan to promote planned growth for the future of the "East Trail" (Tamiami Trail East l U.S. 41 East) corridor in Collier County. The East Naples Foundation envisions development along the East Trail over time according to a community based master plan. This is not about the road itself. This effort is not an evaluation of how many lanes or how much asphalt should be poured on US 41. This vision for the future focuses on the property, the buildings, and the features along the East Trail. These features will ultimately be developed and redeveloped in a 0 way that either contributes to or detracts from a sense of identity, character, place and m functionality for the people who live along and travel the corridor. The Study Area is a stretch of approximately 14 miles beginning at Airport Pulling Road Tr- adjacent radjacent to the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Areas to County Road 92. The Study Area covers a long distance of roadway with varied characteristics and multiple functions serving both travelers and neighbors. The functions of the corridor span the spectrum, from the northernmost portions that can serve as a "main street" for E established communities in East Naples,to the southernmost portion that is a scenic route through the Collier-Seminole State Park and rural agricultural lands. The future character of the corridor will be dictated over the next twenty years as many currently developed sites reach the end of their structural and functional lives,and many undeveloped lands face development pressure. The East Naples Foundation identifies the 0 need to focus the activity, growth and opportunities of the corridor in a way that best and N L most efficiently serve the people living, working, owning land, or doing business along .°6 the East Trail corridor. 0 U The East Naples Foundation has undertaken this planning effort for the following 171. purpose: cc N To develop a Master Plan for the U.S.41 Tamiami Trail corridor which a vtfll encourage planned growth,both commercial and residential, that is compatible with the unique natural resources of the area, resulting hi an E enhanced quality of life for all residents. l The East Trail Corridor Study Area defined for this planning effort does encompass some property within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) boundary, however the recommendations of this Vision for the East Ti-ail Corridor are only for Lands outside of the CRA boundary. Any reference to property within the CRA boundary is only conceptual in nature, and is not intended to alter or vary from the CRA's Redevelopment Plan that guides and governs all future development within the CRA. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 1 April 2010 Packet Pg. 153 10A.1- Vision for the East Trail corridor --• Master Plan Study Process The objective of this master planning effort is to anticipate, plan and identify adjustments to regulatory framework so that the East Trail corridor grows viably while protecting quality of life. Current conditions have been documented and analyzed. Community interests have been defined and prioritized in this Vision for the future. This Vision will ultimately be translated into a master plan document complete with goals, policies, and i implementation mechanisms that ensure sustained adherence to principles of the plan. E a The following outline provides the detailed steps of this master planning effort. Steps 1 `o and 2 have already been completed. This Vision document fulfills Step 3. 0 2 1. Existing Conditions Inventory — Professional planners, engineers and ecologists £ collected, tabulated, and mapped existing conditions along the corridor, including: c corridor boundaries, land use, zoning, utilities, drainage, transportation, demographics, E and design characteristics. _ 3 2. Public Workshop—A meeting was held March 30, 2009 to display collected data and E- solicit input from the community and stakeholders to identify the area's strengths and coo __ weaknesses,likes and dislikes, and desires for the future. N 3. Vision — Professional planning consultants prioritize the goals and objectives of 2 the community within the framework of existing conditions and potential for the d future. The vision is embodied in a statement document and an image that conveys both the concept for the development of the corridor and: the illustration of the w segments,gateways,nodes,opportunities and constraints along the corridor. 7 o 4. East Trail Plan — This plan document will outline the goals, objectives and policies N that provide a framework for the development community and the public agencies tola achieve an outcome consistent with the vision for the corridor. The East Trail Plan will y provide the following: background data and analysis, and guidelines for planned o transportation, land use and urban design elements. The Plan will also identify necessary a. improvements and recommended methods and criteria to achieve the desired results. C Recommended methods may include: incentives, performance standards, form based d codes or new development standards. m __ c 5, Public Input—A second meeting will be held with the community and stakeholders to ta gather input and answer questions related to the draft Corridor Plan. °' i c 6. Adoption — Collier County staff, Advisory Boards and Commissioners must review ai and consider the Plan for adoption. 0 ca 7. implementation — After the Plan is adopted, the implementation of the plan may a involve: Growth Management Plan amendments, such as new Future Land Use designations, overlays or commercial location. criteria; Land Development Code amendments,such as new zoning districts or overlays; capital improvement plan updates; new funding strategies; and new public outreach strategies or programs. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 2 April 2010 Packet Pg, 154 1 O.A.1 Vision far the East Trail Corridor � �k rev �- ' f Emil �` ' r jam ,; ' � � �°`- T ,-"* ems:'`.,f �r� -k +, .ir,��' ar*,` ',��. .,x- +s�`.r r .t"�r + _, , t >. a'l',i we, .a�.-^ a?s d c. mow. } m+^- .$'... ';�5� '',i ''s:.q O `IIS. "` m x g: �#'sa .a rr R Rei '" ri --. ',' e .'k .s a3c�ae. .s ,r qtr, --», a .` .,-- 5-r p `A._ n m� 1s x. =ter d r'r' ix ;:* k,.I� 5:ams```ir�.; t, .. w 0 ,� &�` "6'yR^, a -.,¢, * 'Yd-rC` - sr sxa�` n, } 9 r. "'"t't"`. a � ..� �w i „ ��� ,a y �r � --u� � ars G1 CN '�9 ?fid Y. .1.°:-"'"t '^ k y. T ', y,, .. "} i', ..1.74.;:'-''''''.:;-4'''.:', 5 ' ?,,x a — ' W`'` ^, ..f17),-4...;.:-, ..c c. +F ,� �i^..�i y4 ,"ww"`'�? ''o ,max Sm�s u r s,rt s " �f '$ %7..144.4., kO t �a<*', .'"` °` & ,rt '"K'r"`.+' a�,.`' t i4 ,ry „x x< n d ti �, ,,+ 9.« - y" " a 1ii y r-•baa. r 4:',.:1:1,,,;: .0:4:;'-': -,1,;:: : §ts cam., -. p � v `.:�� ' . :21:, '. K 4 ` fi, l` ? x'�i.'e:' Ak �� s„� .,,,,,,,.4:,„;;:f s" j 'A "krc ..4��F ' re''''':,7''' .w ' 'SMI_'z^ z., g } O "History of the Tamiami Traii,"Authority of the Tarniami Trail Commissioners and the County Commissioners of Dade County,Florida, 1928. N• 0 Histo y 'C L O Opened in i928, the Tamiami Trail has long provided a critical connection for the State 0 of Florida, from Tampa to Miami. The importan--too e of this route as a state connector has a cu been overtaken by newer highway improvements to Interstate 75 that is now the high c capacity route connecting the Fort Lauderdale area to Tampa and points north. co d w Much of the Tamiami Trail that runs along the west coast now functions as an arterial roadway run7�iug through urban and suburban areas. Cities along the west coast have .c made efforts to redefine the arterial roadway to better fit their. communities. These w communities have found through traffic studies that the Tamian�i Trail is often utilized Q more for local trips rather than long distance trips. This means the Trail corridor should develop with local context and character similar to a "main street" rather than a throughway in an urbanized area. Other portions of the Trail are much more scenic, where the landscape stretches for miles over agricultural lands, the Everglades, and other protected parklands. Johnson Engineering, Inc. 3 April 2010 Packet pg.15 1 O.A.1 Vision,for the East Trail Corridor f ,k 5 _,,s---e� " y S a ,#rte,.. i w'f fit,. •' -'� s`Y' ri t f w gK c.fie �'2,0'..-eft,',ft,', "fit' is. ,+Fast �. -4.1„,,,,N.,.?,.,c .� '�*�,_. " t Intersection with Airpo• rt Road t , ; :'t 41.-,,,,,,ttl,14,411.:t, •A'.., 1 „.,..ri**4.1„.,,Az411,/,,i•, , ,....-;„4„, 4 1,4-==- ,,.06..''44^",+. * -,,,, ,.... y � ,t*s i`#rq"^. t, i ?r .',„' A . ,"''3'' x.. iF "^'q." .g^ {. Iry y,�r. *x i="'° '+ s� 4`tx • w Ri'.. 's." �,w �•`e° r,: L FS- -`&r.,.Y " :: "l:.r 'RFs .•M^•-\, {K: •,*•, }�,., • lr -,R4 "yr, L��. T'y` a t om,. t"�-+''+�' .. } Z4..` z,...„..7.,- O ;—s. .qr ", •a. * �''':' 1 4_•_ :'''''r '�: c-�..,.e.e '�%,r.u6 ?x9 1 ,1w rk•„y r,I' r`. #« ' ti,,..-, � �- Intersection with C 1t. 9S1 . a r �' o tis m z¢ ter x% '�i .�4�dn '�,Yr �k ' ;� • ..yea. "^,�"4 ' y t..:,��,°, q'pj.• Q1 v.4:-..= "` -s ..� ,#ser .'Tc a' , b}}' c K f— m r ,* ,'-i..-.-.7a cv ee ^,s,.K E '„ e`k '" ,,.d ry d t,e, 4 � �., "' ' ',"4.,,,,, w•.a,,S� ,. to Tr tlf" fit w - �VI' M ,31;-.„,1121-;4 x'• 'ry t•. h, r,' • 16 L.-1,v41.0 r' .ire `r s,).3 -It": .. .� �'`:,.--.: '� .&'.;, i Apyl ;,,,,1,,,.. , A. r t* - rte at Intersection with C.R. 9. E c�a ,.r a - t� "Iwe,.. r;.. - R.`'»rr^ 0 .1'5,1 .1`4 6.r -1 ,{. ik1 • �,� yJ ' t �� r M� q >, Land Use Characteristics N L O The development along Collier County's East Trail from Airport Road to County Road 92 is a reflection of a wide range of land uses. The Study Area defined for this East Trail Master0. co Plan Study begins to the northwest at the intersection €�f Airport Road and the a East Trail, where the Collier County Government Complex is located. The<sautheastern cu terminus of the Study Area is the intersection of County Road 92 and the East Trail, w where the Collier-Seminole State Park begi o s, 03 , Due to the geographic extent of the 14-mile stretch of the Study Area, the area has been divided into four segments, depicted on the attached Vision Concept Plan. All the segment lines do not correspond with major roadways because the segments were divided ;c . rd.according to transitions inland use patterns. a Segment 1 is approximately 2 miles between Airport Pulling Road and Valley Stream Drive. Segment I includes Lake Avalon and the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Boulevard. • Johnson Engineering,Inc. 4 April?010 Packet Pg. 156 1O.A.1 , ` Vision for the East Trail Corridor e Segment 2 is approximately 2.5 miles, from Valley Stream Drive to Navajo Trail. Segment 2 contains mostly developed or planned residential neighborhoods including Sabal Bay, Lely Country Club, Naples Manor, Treviso Bay, and Whistler's Cove. s Segment 3 is approximately 3.5 mules, from Navajo Trail to Naples Reserve Boulevard. Segment 3 includes Lely Resort, Eagle Creek, the C.R. 951 intersection, and the new Super WalMart. e Segment 4 is the longest segment, measuring approximately 6 miles, from Naples Reserve Boulevard to County Road 92. This includes Reflection Lakes, Fiddlers Creek, Six Ls Farm and Collier Seminole State Park. The corridor is characterized by the established neighborhoods of East Naples, which gradually transition to the southeast to more golf course communities and suburban and rural style development. In Segments 1 and 2 the commercial property along the East Trail was limited in size after the widening of US 41, so that much of the commercial land in these segments is underutilized. The corridor is bisected by the intersection at County Road 951. This intersection is an important crossroads because County Road 951 connects Naples to Marco Island going `4 south, and connects to the 1-75 interchange going north. The intersection is developing with commercial shopping centers and big box retailers. Moving to the southeast, the development along the corridor becomes more sparse, with some suburban neighborhoods and more rural and agricultural lands. Potential for a new self-sustaining neighborhood exists on the property owned by 6Ls Farm at the southeastern end of the corridor, which is a large land area designated on the County Future Land Use Map as eligible for a rural village. 0 For this planning effort,the Study Area has been limited to properties along the East Trail within a half-mile distance from the centerline of the Trail. This half-mile dimension allows our study to encompass parks and schools that are in close proximity and are important to the corridor_ The half-mile dimension also allows us to represent and ca evaluate walkability in the form of pedestrian sheds. ca d E L V f4 Johnson Engineering.Inc. 5 April 2010 Packet Pg. 157 1 O.A.1 Vision for the East Trail Corridor r l., t.0 . m - I £ST^_A`.AVE 1�� (Sus TrM t••513bo1$ 6�F ti 1 DAVE'BLfita. T. .. 2 f Public Ccotrnti i Itteadmilial Total Acta v 54.59 345-26 659.36 1063.03 0 5,16% 32.61% 6203% 100% 8 E 7 { •L T E o g 1, C m S. rn. 5 �. > rnucsAs5maOR s � w,TiLmur4enau,ax�:�t rs 0 0.150.3 0.6 0.5 IiimEtaos)•JADmy25.2607 �}—q,� co co trfdi (OZD.NO.Z©07^el_ _ !" 'i N {,.4±v J.4.11.EES-val. f, 1' cm-=.e:..., TR-.4 E e.� 1:7531:::::::- �++wa•tr. sav South U.S5��Transportation r,:-aw� w Ls5 :..imic�v.tg �v w, < t _cr.f..." .• Con ourrency Exception Area(TCEA) *.au-..rt-.<1:.a-..—'-a.9.?tnI IS 711 r 0 QT Circulation N The East Trail is a significant arterial roadway that serves the East Naples community. N The predominant mode of travel is by automobile, although the East Trail corridor has c opportunities for alternative modes as well. The Collier County Metropolitan Planning :12° Organization (MPO) labels the East Trail from Rattlesnake Hammock Road and north c into the City of Naples as a "Congested Corridor." The Collier County Growth CO Management Plan delineates the U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area Z. co (TCEA) at the northwest portion of the East Trail from Rattlesnake Hammock Road and a north to Davis Boulevard. This designation is established pursuant to Florida law in d recognition of communities who adopt strategies for Urban Infill and Urban w Redevelopment. This area of the East- Trail is granted exceptions from traffic E concurrency because a variety of uses are in close proximity, and provisions for E alternatives to auto-only circulation are available. Such alternatives include: bike racks, w bus stops, mixed use development, and sidewalks, which are considered appropriate Q solutions to congested conditions. Alternative modes exist and are planned for expansion along the corridor. The Collier Area Transit service has bus routes from the northwestern extent of the Study Area to Greenway Road, and a future transit route is proposed to extend south to C.R. 92, Johnson Engineering,Inc. 6 April 2010 Packet Pg.158 10.A.1 Vision for the East Trail Corridor Sidewalks are primarily located within the East Trail right-of-way from the northwestern tip of the Study Area to Naples Manor subdivision. Pathways are proposed to extend from C.R. 951 south in the future. Bike lanes are primarily located within the corridor from the northwestern tip of the Study Area to the Rattlesnake Hammock intersection. Bike lanes are proposed extending south from G.R. 951 in the future. Population Characteristics Collier County's Comprehensive Planning Department delineates planning communities and generates population figures for each area. The planning communities that relate to the East Trail corridor are the East Naples, South Naples and Royal Fakapalm planning communities. The County's statistics project population growth from 68,724 people in 2008 to 98,876 people in 2020, constituting an increase of 30,152 residents (an increase of 44%). The figures show small growth of population in East Naples (northeastern portion of the corridor), an increase of 51% in South Naples (central portion of the42) corridor) and growth that nearly doubles the population in the outlying Royal Fakapalrn area. .. POPULATION PROJECTIONS BY PLANNING COMMUNITY COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA CNI COLLIER �•COUNTY km�` 5 2020 020YY2008-2IC0H'1i A5 .2008220G15 2`Z0ter-°T0.H$2A6`N%0G1 5 P2PRO €CTION pJECTIDN NUM RICO ,r- 0A -#F171-!-747-'428 q _ C �5%�R§ " ^ ":124t15 �r � 111164°,4•. Q 511 � ca r t from Economic Development Council of Collier County's"Market Facts 2008-2009" source:Cater County tn Coprehermve F mn-rt >1^eparimeni,Re,i:ed , 8 N L O The 2000 Census data for Census Tracts adjacent to the East Trail corridor indicates a o median household income of$39,405 for this area, which slightly exceeded the State of 9 Florida's median household income of$38,819. cc Neighborhood and Housing Conditions (?) The East Trail is a community of many neighborhoods. Older established neighborhoods are located at the northwestern portion of the corridor, proximate to many community facilities. From Rattlesnake Hammock Road and south, existing and planned large golf course communities are the predominant neighborhood type, with the exception of some established single family subdivisions including Naples Manor. Housing characteristics range from older single family structures in established neighborhoods, to newer single and multifamily structures in the gated and golf course communities. A cross section of the community is served, from entry Ievel housing to luxury estates. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 7 April 2010 Packet Pg.159 10A.1 Vision for the East Trail Corridor South of C.R. 951, single family developments have been approved and developed along side established larger tract subdivisions that accommodate rural single family homes and some mobile homes. Fiddlers Creek is a large community permitted for residential development along an extensive section of this part of the corridor. Potential for a new self-sustaining neighborhood exists on the property owned by 6Ls Farm at the southeastern end of the corridor, which is a large land area designated on the County Future Land Use Map as eligible for a rural village. Economic Conditions and Trends `o co After years of dramatic economic growth through the last decade, economic conditions L0 have deteriorated for the country, the state, and particularly southwest Florida. Housing y and construction were primary economic drivers for this area throughout the past decade, o and the housing market has been in sharp decline since reaching its peak in 2005. a) Development projects that were approved in recent years are facing financial difficulty as _> homebuying lags behind market supply. With the drop in homebuying and consumer F3 spending, the commercial development supporting residential areas along the East Trail has also suffered decline. Businesses have closed and some new commercial a) developments remain unoccupied. Economists indicate the outlook is a slow, steady recovery over the next several years. »° c a) With the development of a new hospital on County Road 951 near Rattlesnake Hammock E `` Road, along with the County Government Center that will endure as a major workplace, r the East Trail corridor is an area that can continue to attract new residents and support T 0 new business if properly planned. c, N Environmental Characteristics -a 2 .r CO Beyond the most urban portions of the corridor, areas surrounding the East Trail are rich -8°a in environmental quality. Sugden Park and Eagle Lakes Park provide a glimpse of the •L natural features for the residents to enjoy in the more developed areas of the corridor. C The Collier-Seminole State Park at the southeastern terminus of the corridor is a large a protected natural area. South and east of the Study area are Panther Zones designated by Z the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Collier County's environmental policies and N standards have governed the development of subdivisions built over the past 10-15 years d so that significant native vegetation is preserved and maintained in perpetuity. Such c environmental regulations shall continue to be observed and followed as the corridor E develops, with a focus on avoiding impacts to wetlands and critical habitat for protected E species. 15Q Johnson Engineering,Inc. 8 April 2010 Packet Pg.160 10.A.1 Vision for the East Trail Corridor Past Planning efforts The Community Character PIan for Collier County ("Character Flan') was completed in 2001. The Character Plan set forth goals and implementation steps to redefine centers of activity and quality neighborhoods throughout the County. The Character Pian identified the need to focus on building human scale settings rather than auto-oriented, single use developments. The Plan illustrated photos that were ranked as the least appealing images of Collier County according to a public image survey. As shown below, all three of the lowest ranking photos were taken in East Naples. The Character Plan also included a $ conceptual design study of the Naples Town Center shopping center, showing how infill c development could revitalize the declining strip mall as a mixed use center of activity. The Character Plan put forth valuable planning strategies and implementation steps to promote quality design of the built environment in Collier County. Only a few of the 2° recommendations have resulted in new policies or techniques applied in the processing of development projects. 3 vr a� .'z�'xr w,,,t- t a, E �'1"-'*'. : 4 -r �� .., u r ,,..y x �t+€ •Ms O �' a hs p N rr F > k _ sx a w 'a ,.xs _i 3 Isle of Capri Road Tamiami Trail East Naples Town Center y The three lowest rated images from the Community Character Plan for Collier County i L o U , to CD Z. nz C N CD a> c a) . E L U et r r Q o� Johnson Engineering, Inc. 9 April 2010 1 Packet Pg.16 10.A.1 Visionfor the East Trail Corridor Sobt gtaii 60441,cvniarma Per Florida Statutes Section 1633177 (13),local governments are encouraged to develop a community vision that provides for sustainable growth,recognizes its fiscal constraints, and protects its natural resources. The stakeholders along the East Trail corridor realize that their future must be planned according to a vision that directs growth in an orderly manner in appropriate locations. This visioning process for the East Trail incorporates public involvement and applicable planning principles to arrive at a vision concept plan and a vision statement with supporting goals and strategies to direct future development along the corridor. 0 Public Involvement E c A Public Input Meeting was held on March 1 °•' € i 30, 2009 to survey the priority issues of • .�- ---- .' property owners and residents along the �:; ,� I East Trail corridor. Property owners 1 i ' y ftp ; t11 . ir ,,,,,,..1'1; i N adjacent to the East Trail and neilzborhood8` ` adjacent to the Tr to Study Asea erre ,, P associations � notified of the meeting by mail, and it was i „4�,�' _ advertised in the Collier Citizen newspaper. = An Image Preference Survey was conducted it0 with approximately 40 meeting attendees. .� c The Image Preference Survey consisted of r M1 N 40 pictures taken both along the East Frail0 and in other areas of Collier and Lee :� -'''11: --7--- -'17 ' Counties. Pictures ranged from rural scenic r� 1i - o views to urban hardscapes. The results of .?h1;r .., 6 1 Y �- -a the Image Preference Survey revealed that — o the most favored images were well landscaped semi urban and suburban scenes, - a. as illustrated to the right and below. c r ri tt-` 0 k � a O1i jTh"vq, i t "ht.5 5 f P 1i. l' - v.r.. i"4'+ Y K. :: r-s }s '- E i W '; --- r 4 ,"� 1 1 :a 1, Q r r, k] 4 dv 12 mai "k`e M, .:A 4 l^- 4 aY w;' -u� .c a.4.�sraF'.XC..`. 'µms . '..Sr � r- �r" '-s-:"aha.... -a 10 Johnson Engineering,Inc. April 2010 Packet Pg.162 10.A.1 Vision for the East Trail Corridor The images that were ranked as least favorable during the image Survey are depicted below. These images portray auto-oriented uses along roadways that are characteristic of sprawl-like development. 4 f TO I S___,T,--,. .;:_ Jam'! ". its t L 0 b. E C, CD CNI yI CO be �, �r ie y PAWN', 461 ,E , _1/PE F 7. G 0 Meeting attendees also answered individual questionnaires about their likes, dislikes and ;, vision for the East Trail's future. The issues most commented on by meeting attendees13 concerned: N 1. Development types (preferences for types of businesses and communities) a 2. Aesthetic issues (appearance of roadsides and buildings) L CD 3. Traffe(safety and convenience for cars and pedestrians) 9 N Other comments received related to recreation, natural resources, community services, and public safety. iv c For the final phase of the Public Input Meeting, attendees divided into workgroups of a four to eight participants. The workgroups focused on one of the four segments of the corridor. The participants identified positives, negatives, and. nd future goals for each segment. The results of this exercise revealed that top priorities for all groups were c related to development types and aesthetics. Less noted vFere the other issues of w connectivity,natural resources,recreation and public safety. Q Johnson Engineering,Inc. 11 April 2010 Packet Pg. 163 10.A.i _' Vision for the East Trail Corridor 'Applicable Planning Principles Using the available data and priorities from the perspective of stakeholders along the corridor, it is evident that a continuation of the past development patterns for twenty more years into the future will not bring about desirable results. Today's struggling commercial strip centers, disconnected neighborhoods, and automobile oriented buildings and uses are not the tools for successful community development in the future. The spread of suburban development sprawling into rural areas is a pattern the Florida Legislature has identified as a problem for communities Throughout the state. As a result, 2 Florida Statutes are designed to control growth management policy or land use changes iii 1 that result in low density, single use development in the countryside that constitutes c sprawl. .= The Transect 05 The existing characteristics, development patterns and context of the East Trail > correspond to a planning model known as the Rural-Urban Transect. 3 I- A transect, in its origins (Von Humboldt 1790), is a geographical crossTr - co section of a region used to reveal a sequence of environments. Originally, N it was used to analyze natural ecologies-, showing varying characteristics through different zones such as shores, wetlands, plains, and uplands. c Far human environments, such a cross-section can be used to identify a E set of habitats that vary by their level and intensity of urban character, a1.5 '1 continuurra. that ranges fr-om rural to urban. In. Transect, planning, this ca range of environments is the basis for organizing the components of 1' urbanism: building, lot, land use, street, and all of the other physical o elements of the human habitat. ,a -Andres Duany,et al.,SmartCode&Manual CS (Miami: New Urban Publications,be.2005). N L O The Rural-Urban Transect is a tool that helps us understand and govern the development :° of communities. The Rural-Urban Transect defines the segments of a community from its most intense"urban core" where the highest density and building heights exist, to the N moderately dense "urban center," the less dense "general urban" transect, the more a __ spacious "suburban" transect, the wooded and agricultural "rural" transect, and the c "natural" transect consisting of unaltered landscape. In The Lexicon. of the New co Urbanism published by Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company, land use, building types, and °' design standards are applied to each transect to establish human scale and sustainable development patterns appropriate for the context of each area. P c.) ca The East Trail currently incorporates a full range of urban to rural characteristics starting Q at the County Government Complex at the Airport Road intersection, extending to Collier-Seminole State Park at the County Road 92 intersection. Using the Rural-Urban _. Transect typology as a guide to manage future growth along the corridor, the design of a vision for the future of the East Trail takes shape. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 12 April.2010 Packet Pg.164 10.A.1 Vision for the East Trail Corridor In order to fulfill the orderly development pattern of the Rural-Urban Transect model, the areas along the East Trail Corridor must be designated with appropriate Transects of Urban Center, General Urban, Suburban, Rural and Natural. Urban Core is not recommended for the East Trail corridor, because Urban Core would be typical of a city center which does not correspond to any portion of the East Trail. Centers Along with the Transect designations and related development standards that would be applied to accomplish appropriate scale and style of development relative to location along the corridor, a system of centers or nodes can be designated as concentrations of activity. The Growth Management Plan already applies the principle of centers in the form of Activity Centers located at major road intersections. The Community Character Plan for Collier County sought to advance the concept of centers to be more than commercial nodes. The Character Plan suggests convenient centers should offer the g following: quality experiences; diversity of uses, including retail, workplaces, housing, ; and community facilities; and building types that are durable and flexible to be functional as markets change. The centers should be scaled consistent with the Transect model, so that intensity and design of the center relates to the intensity and design of the surrounding area. Centers put forth in the Character Plan that would be appropriate along the East Trail corridor range in type and scale from town centers, neighborhood centers, village centers,hamlets,and rural crossroads. a) E Mobility The third planning principle that relates to the corridor characteristics and public priorities is mobility planning. The concept of mobility has eclipsed traditional transportation planning models that focused on the automobile as the only measure of successful connection between two points. A mandate for new transportation planning ,0 methods in Florida became law in 2008 (Laws of Florida Chapter 2008-191 / House Bill 697). Florida's local governments are now required to adopt policies that discourage urban sprawl, establish energy efficient land use patterns, and develop transportation strategies to address reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. In the Quality/Level of Service Handbook the Florida Department of 9 Transportation has created level of services measures so that transit services, bicycling, a. and walking may be counted in addition to the traditional measure of road capacity to serve community mobility needs. This emphasis on developing in ways that reduce vehicle miles traveled results in planning for nodes that allow mobility alternatives. Rather than putting more automobile E trips on the road,it is important to allow opportunities for walking, biking and riding the cri bus to access community facilities, workplaces, and shopping. Quarter-mile and half- mile pedestrian sheds, pedestrian connectivity, and bus transit are important concepts to guide future development and redevelopment of property along the East Trail corridor. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 13 April 2010 Packet Pg,165 10.A.1 Vision for the East Trail Corridor Rte, &citot gimil TiAtiom Statetwit To protect and enhance the quality of life for East Naples residents and business owners, property along the East Trail shall be developed and redeveloped according to orderly and enduring development patterns that concentrate community facilities and services in locations that maximize residents' convenient access so that all needs can be met within their own community, while protecting the scenic quality and natural resources of East _.- Naples. E m The following goals and strategies are the result of community input and priorities for how the East Trail should development in the future. 4,5c E Goal 1. Establish a framework for orderly future development and redevelopment c - that emulates the Rural-Urban.Transect development pattern. Strategies: a, o Create a Vision Concept Plan as a graphic tool to show the desired 3 - development patterns along the East Trail corridor. F- o Establish land use and development standards that observe the range of Tr Urban to Rural characteristics along the East Trail and promote building N and site designs that provide quality environments. o The Urban Center at the northeastern portion of the corridor should be a c concentration of shops, various residential unit types, offices, workplace, E civic buildings,and public space in the form of plazas and parks. e o General Urban areas in Segment 1 and Segment 2 should be primarily low to medium density residential in nature but should provide opportunities c for mixed use developments and live-work units, with quality landscaping c and public parks, squares and greens. N;, o The Suburban area in Segment 3 should primarily accommodate detached 0 -� single family home communities that appear landscaped and green when L viewed from the road ("viewshed developments"). Parks and greenways .°a are also appropriate. o o The Rural area in Segment. 4 should primarily accommodate agriculture y and scattered buildings, in addition to viewshed developments and a self- d .' sustaining planned rural village. c o The Natural area is Collier Seminole State Park at the southeastern i terminus of the corridor, which is to remain in its natural unaltered state d with the exception of commercially designated land appropriate for a c corner store at the intersection of C.R. 92. E U Goal 2. Establish centers that correspond to the Rural-Urban continuum to define Zr.' locations where the following components of a community converge: residential, commercial, workplace, bus service, pedestrian paths, bike paths, and community facilities. Strategies: o Establish land use and development standards that encourage concentration and mix of uses at centers with varying intensity based on --, location and accessibility. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 14 April 2010 Packet Pg: 166 1O.A.1 Vision for the East Trail Corridor .o, o Town Centers are designated at the following locations: a The Collier County Government Complex Town Center is a location where all the components of community converge. The complex is a bus transfer station and a major work center, with connectivity to residential neighborhoods within a half mile radius. The aging shopping centers of Walmart and Naples Town Center are opportunities for redevelopment with more intense mixed use settings to incorporate new restaurants and shops within the half E mile pedestrian shed. ® The Rattlesnake Hammock Road Town Center is a location where residential, workplace, bus service, pedestrian paths, bike paths and community facilities converge within the half-mile pedestrian shed. The future development of Sabal Bay could result in a new school and more commercial uses, including addition of a significant workplace. The aging shopping center at the southeast > corner of Rattlesnake Hammock and the East Trail is an 3 opportunity for redevelopment with a more intense mix of uses. ▪ The Navajo Trail Town Center is a location where residential, busCD service, pedestrian paths, bike paths, schools, and a park exist, and mixed use development is proposed on existing undeveloped and 7 underutilized sites. o Neighborhood Centers are designated at the following locations: E B The Sugden Park Neighborhood Center is a location where the park, residential neighborhoods, commercial uses, bus route, and some pedestrian facilities converge to conveniently serve the Lakewood and Avalon area residents. Due to the short lot depth of existing commercial properties along the corridor, low scale mixed .TD use and the introduction of live-work units is proposed for the eventual redevelopment of the existing commercial properties. It The Saint Andrews Boulevard Neighborhood Center is a location where a commercial center, residential areas, pedestrian facilities, the bus route, and the library converge to serve Lely residents and future residents of Treviso Bay. Mixed use redevelopment and infill development of the existing commercial center is proposed to fortify this location as a viable center of neighborhood scale services within walking and biking distance for the adjacent neighborhoods. ▪ The 951 Neighborhood Center is a location where commercial centers, residential communities, and the bus route converge. This cc location did not achieve status as a Town Center due to its location in the Suburban Transect and the limited number of community service components that are viable for this location. Eventual redevelopment of the shopping centers is envisioned as low scale, walkable, mixed use development that creates an identity for the 951 intersection that relates to the large adjacent neighborhoods of Johnson Engineering,Inc. 15 April 2010 Packet Pg.167 10.A.1 Vision for the East Trait Corridor Lely Resort, Eagle Creek, and the other smaller residential neighborhoods in close proximity. o Village Centers are designated in the following locations: g The 6Ls Village Center is designated where the 6Ls Farm currently exists. The Collier County Future Land Use Map designates this large property as a receiving area eligible for development as a rural village. Therefore, a Village Center is appropriate in this location. The Village Center should serve the future rural village as well as nearby residents with minimal commercial uses and 2 services needed for convenience. o Hamlets are designated in the following locations: ▪ The Manatee School Hamlet is a location where community facilities are concentrated at the transition between the Suburban and Rural transects. This hamlet is characterized by the existing community facilities of the schools and the church. The location could be further developed as a focal point for community based activities,along with commercial uses to serve nearby residents. o Rural Crossroads are designated at the following location: it The C.R. 92 Rural Crossroads is designated for squall scale commercial uses such as a corner store due to its location in the natural area of the Collier Seminole State Park. Goal 3. Establish mobility strategies that facilitate pedestrian, bicycle, and bus transit connections between established neighborhoods, new development and redevelopment. c Strategies: o Limit vehicle miles traveled by concentrating development where bus, pedestrian,and bicycle infrastructure exists or is planned. o Allow mixed use development and live-work units along with reductions in parking requirements as a mechanism to reduce vehicle miles traveled. o Require connections between new and existing development, including `o residential uses, commercial uses,and community facilities. 9 o Incorporate new bus facilities in new developments. o Promote complete street design for road improvement projects, so that landscape treatments promoting pedestrian comfort, as well as pathways, bikeways and bus services, are critical components of the road design. Goal 4. Promote economic development by planning for an appropriate mix of uses and housing types to support viable new commercial, retail, restaurant, hotel, and other services. Strategies: o Analyze market characteristics and trends to identify opportunities and limitations that affect development and location of desired uses along the corridor. o Coordinate with the Economic Development Council to develop a strategy to attract new desired businesses. Johnson Engineering,Inc. 16 April 2010 Packet Pg.168 10.A.1 Visionn for the East Trail Corridor o Promote land use regulations that limitincompatible land uses and are responsive to newer trends in building and design to accommodate innovative development types. o Identify a "brand" for the East Trail corridor, and use it to promote the East Trail through marketing initiatives to attract new residents, new businesses and eco-tourism. E O CCC .c d.+ O 2 C7 C, F- CD N t6 C, E O o U O L O U N C, a ca w m C, • E CO w Johnson Engineering,Inc. 17 April 2010 Packet Pg. 169 10.A.1 - - ,. ..*-1';'... SEGMENT I ..-..-,..., 1Tr--,., ?i ,...--...„ ....., . , s it SEGMENT It .., . E %-- >‘"' ..„,, . . .. _ . . a.) ''',, , .•...,:: ''-- ., ,-API,tt-,:.t,F-,,f r.41. 1,__ - '- ',,--:• .. .. • •• , . ;I) \-,. ----',7--*s'.--7441c1•7' E .••"-"•., N., ,A"....C;0 r•---•- ,,...* IS or CC . 1 0 `..-...... ., 0 >,, ,a e., -a ,.. ,TI.;4,,r1tAlr41411r, = 4 1 ',,, smadart‘ ta ., N. '-... , --, i— '.- 8 CO) CC a ..., U) r0 C) .;.:, = C) E _c I LEGEND L) CC .... I ;...,,...4i, ; • i ..cP.Fol..rkt ....., verAd.C.,CA.K.OPAW ] :*.crwl r,*NCif)t, MilIONTIK EDLMIT11.0:•tiLt,SL.rt,„1 -........-.4 '4717;4:il%t%WORK i i rtQeci,.irt-i tali salvicz ' EMTg:miKE9 lvat tttgriC r. TRA,1i•C,P.FINWAVI. ... e ---i .4qtc.14, i ,.=wsirrunou.rm.: , 0,10 -,1::,It'..••.111firAllWstncr.u..,-,, Ire.".*:',''.:t;(31-M00,./s.A?,...-111 ...........s-StGvl.41 UM!, I ,,,,.. ....„ i COnDAttl...10,41,(2.0,4SAgt LC.:krf 17 A *:.)*Ntr.,-,:ln c, Ww, t 1,,,4iHrn7rwt-,ARE ihritCA'Tt.P:011,,,',kt ' ''''''''' ,'L.: ,..;i;,f.,.. - • Packet Pg.170 10.A.1 .-2.',..,--7.-rt;l.f,-Ff-E-.-.:-..;-...s-,-7,,..f.f..,--...'.i.--.,r--,,,,,..-'..,4,•'-t.-,,t,;4---,o-..,,,:,r,..5r;J.--v''s2.mz.l.,..-,..,L.,,:'d-:z.---t-.4::--...;---,:..-t.-,.„.,-.:-...,.:4e,ii.;gf.':'•,.a.,.., ,...,‘..,...--.''.%;'.:,rq'-=i,'.;:E,.,--;,...-i:i-.-::,.---,-..--',"-.-,-,.---..-if:r.L::L ----, . - . ' .- - --.. Z "j E ._ o co 8 E c o ENTIU , a 0 i ,.. , 4 ' v ' ,.....cv co a., lif/t,r,rt.lt.:, E,., -.,., " , 0 I : , ;...., ,,-;4.- (11 . tO.slitl+Plak/OOI: 4.,,i _a>, " , ..."....• SEGMENT IV r!.-4,1.F111.rftf)• '',./..,., 44 ' N z '''...2"* ''''' N / )(,..\\N. 4,31,4 ivdo GOO.t ? or: ----- --.7 b),.0.,,,, . .:A. :-:`0.; ,1,4%,it..'.•,,Ar,t,;,,ii,k E ,1'1•,. , - .....„.... ...\‘'`,...., lit/al/14 tt.aki./StAll t1KV— '-.4-•:"--.144":4--n'--',V-.:.-.7cr'e•1 ''•.-' ,4,-,.;:v.,,,....-k,-0,-.4i cz \\,.. ''''''.4'..;i:4'....,:,.'„1:7,,..., ii°L.±--1,i'4,4„,43--,.,,,, .0:.44b4.1,7!' .,<..7`_7•:,4 °(,.',.6-,, ' .-7,`..."'114,r.:*..„;.4.-',-V-41'7,01.,:,‘ '03-Ai'jk.T.t'•-'.4.1, .' :.....?$!..,i,..iil 4*-07;,:::.,.,,, ,„i:0'.' .;::„-X41 N. ,tv,9.1,t,4''-lacc—..;:z0,-- -..7.„...,..„.,,, ,,,...#--, N,,.. ,..,,,,,,,Dr•rx -41,1 -'-",;-,-J,::: 1..,:;e4-4,'.'4'..-. * -:::::VIN44.f. ' ti sot t.....,.;i ':' c 7. N-,... ' '',‘;,.rif*s •.,4*,. Yit7t41.4.,U,I.," if ji;., ..., `, , )4 '4.4W/Rolgi'll .1;',‘" •:,...',4."';fibitVk.":`.7.elfal, . ...,12., Packet Pg.171 10:A.l c 0 m L 0 0 2 m et m 3 F- m N g /� C t6 N 1 _ U d f6 - d l4 rr rr Q Packet Pg.172 10.A.1 �€€a s a�.� .au , . 4. • POPULATION PROJECTIONS SY PLANNING COMMUNITY x - - ,.` COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA d CDLUER COUNTY 2008 2Di5 2020 2008 2015 '- 2008'2015 r PROJECTION PROJECTION PROJECTION NUMERIC CHANGE alo CHANGE Tkst eY,t 3, 05 x,22'7 !3,$16 6,121 197.07% .4 ztq'` i ss 2.05 213 2i9 B , 3.90°la �� ntbalttaptes" 213,496 203;956 21,300 460 224% . o t aples 2,; 0 I 2622926, 49 28 i 66 0 olden ate . 45, 09 46, 5 47,189 1,194 2-65% 7 �r3Urtakaiee 25,946 •. 38,461 X7,$44 12515 4823�G arc®1slartd l94 4,'599 7 105 7.03% c tarth laptes 58;1009 £�18i0 4 17 3 209 648% loyal Pakapalm 15,,33. 24,314 30,898 •8,781 5653% .1 urs Estates .37,270 46, 96 3523 $,396 25.08°lo > 4-4 d 'out4h aplirs 27;,393 35,414 41,129 13;024 29.30% a F ,,31rb2A Estates _ 39, 2 3 141 150,757 1 .',386 31,86/0 '' COWER COUNTY 2006 2095 2020 2000-2095 2008 2095 "+ `* co PROJECTION PROJECTION PROJECTION B�IUIVIERICCHANGE Flo CHANGE N yofA�laples __ 23Y0+ ..2.5ti,635 26,700 1;531 8.15% �,�< r ; [x,Island 15 88 °17,338 18,332 1350 8.44% s !lY 648 X83 . "" `709 ;35 6,40°lu._ a� _ Soares:Collier Count'Comprehensive Pbnning tJepmhnsnt,Revised 6n18 C frtO * -4.17-14-11-`;1. x 4�I ` t ?Lan ING 1�ONHVIk�NmES N n ,�� COLt1EP�COUNTY L I�1k�A ' >, =-^ ` "7•tlorih Malates" 7-Royall akapalm ` 2-Ceniralapies S-Aural Est-tics N • ��# �-Doldenfiieie �-Cnrksoreti�• B. rtS r ' !° �' �i-i as' apfes 14-Immnkalea 'a -r -South�Naples 3�-dig C prays 'C o -iJla�co'3sEand �2-13r"oanEstatea `p � N a �" y CO .':'::p r.A;w.f'-'....',;(.,,,.a..„.., '.\g.,4:.,..•,-...,,*. ,,,,,,1 Ilv.i-t,„:: -k ... 0--lt,..,,,'- _sA„..__t.,,*.,,,,ritv" .� a 'i a) ',,"'--',:,v..4',..A.-,•.4, ."::•ime. t'w..%60.7,..i,*,,4-40,416Vvia •4,4:..-i..,-.:''''-:'-:,,,t-,1"...''''',Z7-o- , -:,:,,,,,l'`.J'.• 1, -:zole-y„-v!P Gs r t0c J j 7i ,N "\.i_ l{i €1..,,,,.:1,47.-..,,A*^ ..__ , 6 i ct�nontic C)e�elc pmant Council of t ulli r County �wt�a.eNaptesFInridacom Packet Pg. 173 1 0.A.1 � � q g — a4 � * icy-y�R.,.,,z. A.�"' ,�, ���" `° * ° `c ,y^' "` .�. ,,,t.-- --,,,,',f, ' ' - uca7,1 - DS pz4.2"ti- .. , - s' +n rad sot.' • it='` ,o,„ k°r ,. ,a:""' . .a ,i4 -'� ;Y 4 r M r „i ��; t"1�R i t�o, oc►� 4 � tc -1.4,q1-1,, . ft � ;~= ^ate t= z a�tu• .- f, •w x ebjec1 v Stu '-.4'r • ois 1i`is r" t"� The, East Nailer Foundation, -inc.--„,,,,,,,t �e Tire a6 �o t tss i p te, hilanthr4 is arm of t' e E N • v jandF de - _ ue to (] j� e :. y,�` N 4 �S �` c rk-u c� ref f i rte ' ., �►S&pc1�10Tts� �trt�ICA�,s 1'�� .,,,,:corn t e .j��, 8[11 D SO� � �' rt"CC1G*1��r �. i niv lvenie t`torfundtand c tamp e a `a.4,orri.a ii e i,-1�"'... ' vi D. ° Etip g a r O ,m 1 -S% i» xea .✓'"r-",,s4,-,....??,41.-,--"!`.,r �;i '`m�«. ',.w d..,.--- :� ".,m`^4.*:,-,`$.,'� ' of+ T miami Tsr a ' AiEa��`l" ,;_'%„.„.......:':,? mem d t l ,, ma , resiait a pla to a a` .�� r ,T«$' as-.-,f4.,.._-4,4; iv ,y r. �1t D �r�U tin �°`�Oa,� t1Let'iSee1'ilOn'�i;oU a '4,-'-74,, GY = �,' ot�1 Eta � e Cli e � �'© �rt�ion ,� n'.r�. O n dor°j• `in sirs.e - ..,,,s E: ,,,,,;-.1-1-t- Sx ecti£d 6 °T i" ° o e� 1� D N. �' Cy xm� ,S•t - *"'�--.-t ,,.tr,�,m' a. gn A - e. '' "'` - ". ,rw' ,4,.-ktr.�to .tC ''''..,f.'„,-1--mt...., .. gam, -- to`d fire'an ident e- 1 e East aj 4EI g a� co Fi a or hast d�zon ' °m i ri '.f '� y e u mate resu Y f u e" n c 15 .3,6011;1:0:A". ..! -•:, 1,!,7";.;',y4 mut ines >; oil ,ob is• v ran po iEi' � i.- 'tha ca �e*t fr itis . e p . e. . '4,4',!• P' 1 r �^ . tate arx dev 1apm�and r edeveli �, . ,.. _ r,- ., ss� v �u < z ' � mr.4, r v.dG ,��%�,�.,R�t ,tx a � �S � l" iifli .170-i a'. io[i"�fft `hfutll e "° 4.'"..:..„..„,... ........-4'-.7, :>� t t �: Mr ��s is " Ott,,, 5 � r ~ Val The publiciiiv€lv€ ee�t companentr of ttiis.stuiy�is imps r ?rcp t r al ,g e � * t, es 4„a:� ,x4�' � � a 7Y �� �'ik'-r,..i +"ef""'" 3';c ,� x-..s°seal- N� ..+ r will have a o er €c a e in e re ii- fits and business TI - -.. andso o1de„ i a areae �pp. e, P w .� P; ,.. e - a too ns l'':p es , ..,, n ekto-iri w aide 'd= stu rots pont a e; n° o a= ern Late. a e`dui or M ar h 3.-0i.„.20-09-46.,a infarrntl e c itimv€ = tinthe prises-ss i '0 ti}b!i :+oaks h 3r 7x e N recon d will be •stet .14' on vailab t, o n ° nrfnue e y o � =a support or get more 0 ° ti • • in mor.n -bout . ei fl ntac n tesfnd ► at com o • '-2 ,uv tr x...� L. 4915 F, �14 Q i L' F1 itST PUCK -H E ":;x-' ' p'tg . . t 30 t . .. _. .a ls'l lt'li$i143,. ti. Fl.� 3�1 Packet Pg. 174 10.A.1 C om, eiczt:rt6 ri, f. East Trail Master Plan Study SEGMENT WORKGROUP RESULTS 54GM5NT i fge4"41'3 SECMEM 3 SEGMENT 4 AESTHETICS .. Landscaping and Open Space 4 I Architectural Design 4 Rural Character 4 Cleanliness a CONNECTIVITY Existing Pathway I I • Ut SERVICES Quick Response Time 4 CC D. Proximity to Points of Interest 4 DEVELOPMENT Quantity of Commercial Space 4 I 2 L New Homes 4 0 w New Development 4 ` Density 4 0 OTHER Natural Resources I I ♦ I r _ AESTHETICS C -- `Seas of Parking 4 O Unsightly Utilities 4 d Unsightly Buildings 4 > Guardrails 4 W — Homeless B.Day Laborers 4 .. Liter 4 CONNECTIVITY CO Limited Connection between Destinations 4 Mt N 01 Dangerous Roadways(Turnlanes/Access) 4 4 v z 1' O Segmented Sidewalks 4 ,r V DEVELOPMENT C Unsightly Development(Pawn,Tattoo) +b 4 E Redevelopment Obstacles 4 .0 �. Limited Commercial Lot Depth 4 Strip Malls 4 4 Vacant Business 4 4 O Low Income Housing 4 4 O CNI High Impact Fees 4 OTHER - Perceived Crime&Safety 4 I • I 3 ._ ' _;u.�.,::.-:AESTE15I7C,;.��,:.... ..t'fi.�-s�;"t„�.-T-�k �..r�,,.,'�,`zr�e ,:fir:;., :ice N r Increased Landscape 4 I r i - ":.Increased Open Space • r 'p `i Increased Buffer 4 4 ss- ',. Design Review!Review Committee a U Update Unsightly Building Facades 4 r I to t,Control Light Pollution d V;',' �y .x,"sac 7,F;.L* €, •s. v*t.GOtdPIECflctii'.iF«w w ..,kvt, .xzs�;az'' rz,t,«, ', .�'a: O ea ,„7:4,0$4,,, Improve/Provide$IkelPetlestnan ,�, $ 4 '... , Connections ok.9 „,,: a� -kro TLDtke'K %1at,-" . `_.,a , t'w'o in Increased Parks&Open Space 4 ♦ CIS aL / y l r.iltat..«'s ' „� �`.a? ie rias tat___ __,,trmrcg,, � "`_.. P4m47 °'�' . , i " uz" Increased Access to Civic Uses 4 4 I I C m a..,,. a.,! It ,.t..:, :_ =,,:'_. ,...., _.._...i,;,:s4Nwit•azEsitELfi1R.Msierr,,'"?.4_sZe:# -`an' _. .s;,;+:-. .i f ry..::..,€"'.,.,.la.r.fi.,,,a,7,=* 1 9 Increased Density + EL , "Increased Retail(up scale) 4 4 � r' increased Hotels 4 4 y ^ 'Increased Botique Shops 4 Q g ; .Increased Resturants 4 95; Lot Assembly for Larger Retail 4. -_'Business ParkI 4, 4 _� ..a.y:$'t'.,a r�„-::,. mow...Y,:: ....,.' � .,f; ^ +,csS=`s"' ft1ER.-.. `” _s'.-'^ r;.._. `: u'r2;.5.'s.,.<_..i'. �. ;,,i-og.Environmental Sensitivity 4 4 :,t Ecotourism 4 4 ^�'�'�meeting PtacestConventign :.:4,4„4,kk,Center/Amphitheater 1 4 Johnson Engineering,inc. Ha20080000i200e77564100-East Naples Foundation Inc.(Tamiami Trail E.Strategic.Planning)1PUBLIC INPUT MEETING DOCUMENTS\East Naples Troll_Survey Analysls.vls Packet Pg.''175 1 O.A.1 Srtai ✓LCLfx(.CO �Q6411 r!.ML JiiG. East Trait Master Plan Study ,„� Public Input Meeting 3!30/09 Individual Questionnaire Responses What do you think the East Trail What do you like along the Trail should develop/change over the What is your biggest concern and want to keep the same? next24 years? about the East Trail? .f,, srHEcies=t>w I lsr22Pnc6.2K== w I..;,. Arecs•a .., ..; »1 -- 12 Landtoapit6/Parts/Natural Areas is Appearance 3 Perception and Appearance 2 EeeySISPiefe Update old Eosin=Fronts Loss of Character 2 lighting Cte e.up Lack of Maintenance and Reinvestment ' 1 Old FlpidS.a Character SStation L- i'--_'ls,.n?.& 'rz3lONNEOTIVE'1t_3 't Arclwsdurat Continuity ITranccon Zone Beeman Se;Imanls ) uteri O 3 SbewaactS&a Lana.I Werra.1"ra3 Landscaping 2 Indic Safely ea./ t ConnadHAlb the Library EslaCfab a Design RerfewComra6raa 2tSefaN for Mand Pedestrians L6 ndermound .__ 1 Gaff¢ 'sir gild fdiUo$ U :'9 ,..;..�'_" 1t es,74- SMM—� SERAS8ESiilw,.,',ri"•.. i'+:i.,a:> ::itEDREA IOlii ie ':Prr`fs':..)1 1 LiaMmn Ordinance olf Cagan 1 ost 4 lemmas Traffic Patterns lass IA1 .,.._,a :roE:. �SETiVICESSeri=" 'lg•r*'":'?»"'"t Improve 651 641 ioosedions r'sr:;.:",,.,. ;k:,;2fEVEt 1•r+loitst ' ""s + f1 .+ 3 Library Traffic lights I Blight and Vacant Store Fronts C i smart. Reduce Pealing of Traffic Congestion 3 Low Income Housing co 2 More m Sktewsl6 Connectivity Recreation JMutt$-use hats 2 Balanced Growth I.Uncontrolled Growth E i.+E „:r=;i;:p@fgLDpfeENrw'q#tar,.. -A t Funcetiond Infrastructure 1 Abundance of Storage units 7 tstamra Siamese; r= 3:'r sir: EDREAT1016,RZt",: ..s:.'*Os 1 Development of Ship Malls ; *halls 2 Environmental Enhancements I(debits Homes Ewe..O3 Reslatsam I._.:--.Amba :: '. ea-zl wo*f1 17.1.v„s..r.-. ..GTHETC Z w• -7-'7•4115”, '', w,.:I o French Bakery 2 Adel Center!Library 2 Crime McCormth'5Haniwere i DE4mELOPItEHT;:.3T1::11. "_`."2..{' F Hes 22 l3usinesn Development Tl . Mavis Theater Markel/no as a Originator, 6 Resioerd'at Dzvebumenl More Restauanls Lely Resort Encourage Upscale Development CO Treviso Bay Restaurants(local and chains) Nr ndeorlO ae-inr Ombra C __ i1: .:_y' -'ia;:4.tilliERiZ•g:, "igni:"3'... .; ..^t:xl Retell I Population dismally Hotel tts 1 Low Population Proh34 Pawn and Adult Emertal, eel Slott'. , 5 Mud-use Development C Commercial Nodes(ratter than,tip mails L storage uttt.I o 3 Reduction of Strip Malls 3 Limb Loa/income Heusirm5 - 1 Parking n the Rear of Developments 'C 1.Accommodate Rural Wage Development U ��. I Limit Residential lints Severna*Retell 0 a. w 2 Longer Operable Hours tor Business CS 1 Crime Control/Prevention l 1 Continuable Conant Plan0 et- 0 O N t Prestige/by Percentage >s DEVELOPMENT tai CORRIDOR PRIORITIES N 14 Responses from Individual Questionnaires >_ sa asp O AESTHETICS *SERVICES ®RECREATION • .6 176% 2%14 i .__. 3 0 OTHER V 34 27% sin y CONNECTIVITY ""` C, 4 0 CONNECTNITY ' *DEVELOPMENT 16 13%.. 13.% L `t `tet. *AESTHETICS N OTHER (' .r.:,...,..„....,„,„-:- a3CONNECTIVITY OS 2 4t OOTHER p 2 .." !:. *SERVICES .a+ 6 fix C _ _ El RECREATION o SERVICES `'. s 7 6% r• 0 RECREATION 1 2 0 3 Johnson Engineering.Inc. H120060000t20037766.020-East Naples Foundation has(Tamiami'Oa E.Strategic.Plannhg)4 USLIC WPM MEETING DOCUMENTSSEast Naples Taal ServeyAnalysk slu Packet Pg. 176 10.A.1 110 - EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting St. Peter the Apostle Catholic Church Sign In Sheet E .L 0 NAM. ADDRESS EMAIL 1\ 1-.., A. Art ...5 ( S-)-tOkt-A4te( c t S c , ___R U kb Q_.0,_,OadYkLiik 'i-F6' - a s. Cr 1 �;,.�,�� (a3..,.,t rn;G�ct.�6 JSt 2c�t1l«�n..�e:N- 3 4 i 4,3 ,/ ger//' .„, ,� Tr q- 0 tri de, n-C./i HL 0 ( 6-Ic 4 C 2L T t l LZ} , 551e. ce` (C ,-9 /✓a y VrSa • . 0 ' .0 1 • 5 Or-C- y 7(ter$ 7'i /a P'1'rc 4-s z,-441 Z f'"745 / e as hr-t,ii.,o_C:.a, s''”. 6%4E i'vrr, MAIN-CR -717 (3h-y 411(E-too s ti-e_ Le/Gr we-4s5Av C 466-- C N 7 LitZL..-,, a./V)i-di ° 677.._,-- '- bt --/W-114 8 V A mo ' 04 fir' .c .. _ I P JC IT ¢/Tfv( t+y tof �i 9 Ur4Tr (.-.5/./.141,A.,,-(r'.+to nyb5 c' [ (>E J i S 5 Ca-art/7'7"A f�e... `,,%� 10 fir-,\?;t p.u50 .: e.-Sr1i... c c__-k --'--___v-,-\__. t-S.5c_.(,(,-,_.0,.A. g cr 4 1/, d 11 Et, 5s,-,z,t -(• o - 5 god I c is 1•N .{6ZTh`1 tsicr04. Cls-q e Tr4e,ekgLi.t 2 / ` W 5 cldn ,k- P vy r 12 Kai-en 1 Q r rr e #-±. 1 ),,,&,s / �L 3t-ii 1f, ' /rr'1 ai Ora/1- ofi a "9"--3f-/ a_2>L 1 , .41 x17 /p.', 7.*S .3 4,7 t - -r. . 4 Aa""-e- .Ova • l Packet Pg. 177 -- 10.A.1 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY —...., March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting NAME ADDRESS EMAIL 9,M /17-W abe 440:-.C;C:i 4;0 Ca7 14 / lie . i iil i. A14-pL -,- 5 //9' /47/ca(ey. 15 A 4 ir:61 e,1/ rti g 3 3 4 a)cortia4igm.g-Aft-'f- ..,17.41/z:7--45---g,-33 a dic'z--cc Is _ 16C/7/h R L 6%. Co?tZ-Ar r n .-E 17 v-s , t4-14ru\n,,,A,,-v t,2c9q 0 6?t,s u„E„ 04611,(14-3(itia — c 0 la--'144s. B . A . 5 977 Cilie.L1-0A/ ,S4', \,i\Y6 L ''Z Ft e 6-6 (- - Coit -4f. - ' /*/ ok 19 /t -- p li 7_ co Tr 20 le1? gi-etfo.r-?;_s_ 516.* "71airkeinni.-12-/e -#1.9 3(41/.01. , E 21 SkSars, Go\Aeci\ --.k(e4- C.Vtiktki Lzi... 6,1\AQ.ttke cimmitat. 22 ,-91,ernertz--)-- 3-66--4.,..ra-.. E.,z,,,ce,„ iv / _1st/G EorLcrE c6A.C.P 6 AkTtILINe.t la 0 `II 1.-i \pt -e4 34R9 >. 23 L 0.---------t M TA 8 24 t7,4:!„ / /2) (Y. ,.--(e-7 -)a F 7 e_P,Lte._4_, Alli.r 42 3 i - 8, to 25 9 c_ co c Z 25 to to .. _ 8 • , 27 2 c., co - 28 -..%-' 29 „....... Page 2 Packet Pg. 178 10.A.1 EAST TAIWAN TRAIL MASTER PLAN STUDY March 30, 2009 Public Input Meeting St Peter the Apostle Catholic Church Sign In Sheet . i NAME ADDRESS8 EMAIL \ c ` v - E 1 9NP.,irlyZ,L—Cif,-`try e-M!3'4 AVG !Cc t.0 C7-. c g 2 7�A 0 (4I T' 1t/►�c rj U A-f�c-� f 4`c. 3 g/ uAPc�S do , v� > 3 - /Coy. 3 Doi TA-fu,fi-itA.; -1•12_ ~ 4 S1(r -77c Ec (01/6 G)/ems et ix.) ``a'` 5 ,,e,14,./...--0-7 .-t A_ 4.5"-a 7 5---k1 /.s6,/s Ore al14.415,494.017j/Sifevs-60/ ...3.-.... r Ct?i 6 A _, i a e 4 `T S&O F1 1 p\- C i Q le , i C` Get 0 ,14, hilt ea, o Cii ' , ekes 13307 c , I i.k.s..1,1� 7 L 8 AlCI.0r.e-er, 1J0nnes ?390 .kohl L� 3`ft?.p IDonn'esS(0inIcrml111e. mei �t I/64)9 &t..c L L rt- 1-1-1-1,9`i I i.l 4,:,,,r E s.., et,.„, ...D„. r 1�'£:l S C C rZ[6�'rfe� � � � 5 DL�s LA l=G . C p, ea 7- 174 M)§11K6/ „?40,,-07.2 7k,49/741,4 I —Tel_ 145/ -5-recm267(.6 6-._ la.."4„,,ev 1 12 a 13 _ 1 Packet Pg.179 10:x;1, E .L O W u L O 2 CC a) C, N G1 E t6 A L O L O U d r.+ f6 d U t6 Packet Pg.180 le co ,-. CSi (wnpoJ ow gloom{eigemi: ,lap ) q-luwegoege-eaay-wnpoleiow-JoppJoo vp: _ luawgoegv .,_ <i ith 0 a_ Iii ..,c o co a. ..------, ,,•ie. '4.`" ,,. l: 00°4'* *,e '' ".,'"' .:°)ffilt ',,t• 4' . . I ''',.. . 4 V 4. &"-- S' fte'..?' '41).()! -'' ° 4'.44,',.k'' S li, ('--,- ' '7 i4,.• ' •-• z % _ `- .4 ........,,, _,... . " . - . e' , . 7 ...... 1 , - -- * , 1 1 , , '4' • -.... .k. .7.:: 56*-5- 47: 1 0. . t a f..., ' - . ,,,,,g, „„,, " ---y*incflatam.. — triAakwv ,. 00, .**". . .-. c-"A .4"- ''%,, ,-,-- -1 41229 ll 18 VittE38VE3 VINVSiczi4 —- ' il -<,, ..1.. "S.` , i ..._ . 1; 44 -,- ,...' A.L.0 ....•7— - . 4v% CF4. 41' ''' I. 9.• -.cll..,_, • . ,v _..... , ,,:-....-. ._ --, _ ,,, t , 0 -_ _ , lt. - ,„,- 4 i_V V .,V /"....', S VV '...' :" sianwomm-— 0 ,,,,, ..... ,.... ,LIL 0,..: _ r :---t-,;-4,' . iti«-iiio i"p 1 -4.-1,i - ------- 4------ " ----- t. ,--i- 46, • ,• .:, . , ..,.....;,,: ....._ _ ' -_ %.„. i<4.. ” ..„ V ,.,..., .--.447g --.- .,,epz--.4. -' —"s,g-- IL- 4. Ei ,iz- _ -... -,—, 1...: ' ... • ..,-, '_,-.N ,,,,...1-.0,-„, ,,,,---.` .-r,',!4.:14*-',..;-, ,.. , ; -;-1.„-;0•Uti.%:''.1 ' ---i,',1.; ..".0 ' _ ," ,,•. -,, „. .._.r. ,.. ..._ - t„....-2...7,4 ,. -....1-,..4., .„.... -44, w..-.. i-,aaa.,,t-2.--k1;z - - - -4 .§.1,, ,...1.„,... ,-4.....s .7._ .. - ..-, -